Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-03-14 �ivrtgy COUNTY SANITATIONS DISTRICTS AREA CODE 754 540-290 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA u�,�°°� 9 6 2-2 411 1 \..r P. ❑. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1❑B44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY March 7, 1984 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING. DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 51 61 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 1984 - 7 :30 P.M. 10$44 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Secretary Scheduled upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Iluesday, March 27th at 4 : 30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 28th at 5: 30 p.m. L� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 { ,' (714)540.2910 �r (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings March Mar 14, 1984 Mar 28, 1984 April Apr 11, 1984 Apr 25, 1984 May May 9, 1984 May 23, 1984 June Jun 13, 1984 Jun 27, 1984 July Jul 11, 1984 Jul 25, 1984 August Aug 8, 1984 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1984 Sep 26, 1984 la..� October Oct 10, 1984 Oct 24, 1984 November Nov 14, 1984 Nov 28, 1984 December Dec 12, 1984 None Scheduled January Jan 9, 1985 Jan 23, 1985 February Feb 13, 1985 Feb 27, 1985 March Mar 13, 1985 Mar 27, 1985 try 90ARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: A JOINT BOARDS Area Code„14 IIAGENDA MEETING DATE MARCH 14, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMEN HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 3:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file. minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - February 8, 1984, regular District 2 - February 8, 1984, regular District 3 - February 8, 1984, regular District 5 - February 8, 1984, regular District 6 - February 8, 1984, regular District 7 - February 8, 1984, regular and February 15, 1984 adjourned District 11 - February 8, 1984, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) "A" and "Bn 2 08 84 2 22/84 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $441,922.86 $240,013.88 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 302,876.95 94,811.65 Joint Working Capital Fund - 101,522.99 64,231.66 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 2,421.24 4,332.68 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- 15.83 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 16,775.18 2,438.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 1,228.54 13,696.12 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 65,841.88 4,727.51 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 20.66 15.83 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 2,485.84 8,385.23 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 653.74 86,715.19 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,455.31 978.46 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,027.08 --- $942,232.27 $520,362.45 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(aa) (9) ALL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- 3/14/84 4 -err (9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion adopting revised General Provisions and Standard Specifications dated April 1984 applicable to all Districts' construction jobs for plans and specifications issued after April 1, 1984 (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-23, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, Job No. I-2R-2, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. I-2R-3, to Sancon Engineering, Inc. in the total amount of $842,496.00. See page "C" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-24, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract to Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-097, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $106,600.00. See pages "D" and "E" (d) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-112, indicating that the base tile for the project would be furnished by the Districts for installation by the contractor (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-25, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-112, to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the amount of $19,969.00. See pages "F" and "G" (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-26, approving plans and specifications for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. 2 Computer System RPU's (Remote Processing Units) , Job No. PW-116, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 4/24/84) . See page "H" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-27, approving plans and specifications for Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 4/24/84) . See page "I" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-28, approving plans and specifications for Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner, Job No. J-11R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 4/24/84) . See page "J" -3- 3/14/84 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, approving a deduction of $5,654.00 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. due to substitution of co-plastic slide gates with stainless steel frames for cast iron sluice gates originally specified. See page "R" (i) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, authorizing an addition of $50,242.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for removal of undisclosed asphalt and utilities, changes in grading and in equipment required, additional pipe encasement and other miscellaneous modifications and additional work, and granting a time extension of 220 calendar days for said additional work, equipment delays and inclement weather. See page "L" (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, assessing liquidated damages for 21 days of unauthorized delay in completing the project at $500.00 per day, pursuant to the provisions of the contract for said work, and approving a deduction of $10,500.00 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. See page "M" (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-29, accepting Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "N" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 11705 to G. S. Rasmussen increasing the total amount by $3,500 from $11,000 to $14,500 for additional computer analysis requested by staff re further evaluation of alternate couplings required in connection with Modification of Engine Compressor Units in Blower Building, Job No. PW-092 (This action completes the work on the study) (k) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, authorizing miscellaneous modifications and additional work at no cost to the District and granting a time extension of 41 calendar days to the contract with Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for said additional work, inclement weather and District-caused delays. See page "0" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-30, accepting Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P" -4- .4 imp 3/14/84 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase l� order to Gierlich-Mitchell in an amount not to exceed $87,000 plus tax for Purchase and Installation of Budd Plastic Chain, Sprockets and Appurtenances, Job No. PW-114, to retrofit for trial on one secondary clarifier at Plant No. 2 to replace cast iron equipment that is failing due to corrosion (m) Consideration of motion authorizing installation and evaluation of the following systems to remove sulphur content in digester gases scrubbing systems to comply with new South Coast Air Quality Management District regulations and enable continued utilization of said gas as a cost-saving energy source: (1) Full-scale Romax Process (Job No. PW-126) to be installed under force account at Reclamation Plant No. 1 digester gas compressor facility at a total cost not to exceed $36,000 (2) Pilot-scale Hiperion Process (Job No. PW-127) to be installed under force account at the digester gas compressor facility at Plant No. 2 at a total cost not to exceed $25,000 (n) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing urgency Purchase Order No. 15378 to Philadelphia Gear Corporation� in the amount of $11,246.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of One (1) Replacement Gear Set for Gear Boxes on the Main Sewage Pumps at "C" Headworks, Specification No. E-148, to be used as a standby spare unit for said gear boxes (o) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to ISCO, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $13,040.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of Eight (8) ISCO Sequential Samplers, Model No. 1680, Specification No. E-149, to be used for increased industrial waste monitoring program (p) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Beckman Instruments in an amount not to exceed $11,815.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of One (1) Each Microtox Model 2055 Toxicity Analyzer, Microtox Reagent Starter Pack and Recorder, Specification No. E-150, to be used to improve and expand capabilities for industrial waste monitoring and effluent monitoring required in accordance with the Districts' NPDES Permit -5- 3/14/84 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (q) Consideration of actions relative to preparation of EIR for the updated Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities (Copy of Executive Summary of the Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities enclosed with agenda material) : (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with K. P. Lindstrom and Associates for preparation of Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities. See page "T (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-31, approving agreement with K. P. Lindstrom and Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities, on an hourly-rate and expense-reimbursement basis, for a total amount not to exceed $34,165.00. See page "R" DISTRICT 1 (r) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny appliation for leave to present late claim of Carolyn Malloy relative to alleged damages due to a sewer backup at the Versailles by the Lake apartment complex in Santa Ana, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action. See page "S" DISTRICTS 2 & 7 (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-35, authorizing the General Manager to execute Interim Sewer Service Agreements, in form approved by the General Counsel, with property owners/developers relative to providing temporary sewer service to property outside Districts' boundaries that will be served by District 2, District 7 or proposed District No. 13, in accordance with the guidelines previously established by the Boards and the negotiated AB 8 tax exchange settlement with the County of Orange for annexing properties. See page "T" DISTRICT 3 (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-36-3, approving plans and specifications for Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 4/24/84) . See page "U" DISTRICT 5 (u) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , authorizing an addition of $4,191.28 to the contract with Russco Construction, Inc. for relocation of Edison power ducts feeding the Bay Bridge Pump Station which interfere with the District's facilities and City of Newport Beach highway improvements, and granting a time extension of 28 calendar days for completion of the additional work. See page "V" -6- .4 q, 3/14/84 (9) DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 (v) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main. See pages "W" and "X" (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to the Campus Relief Subtrunk. See pages "Y" and "Z" (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an amendment to the agreement with Courton and Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the Consolidated Master Plan for District 1, the Northern Half of District 6, and District 7, providing for additional services to prepare Mitigated Negative Declarations relative to the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main and the Campus Relief Subtrunk DISTRICT 7 (w) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee in connection with Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Barman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for additional services relative to the realignment of said sewer. See page "AA" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-37-7, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Boyle .Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Barman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for additional services relative to the realignment of said sewer and dual-track design previously approved by the Board, and increasing the total compensation, on an hourly-rate and expense-reimbursement basis, from $122,043.00 to an amount not• to exceed $179,230.00. See page "BB" (x) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-4 (y) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-38-7, approving Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges. See page "CC" (z) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-39-7, ordering annexation of 3.91 acres of territory to the District located at the intersection of Vista del Lago and La Cuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 108 - Mahoney Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) . See page "DD" -7- 3/14/84 (9) DISTRICT 11 (aa) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-40-11, approving Agreement for Use of Sewerage Facilities with the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, relative to connection and service for Huntington State Beach, Phase II improvements, for a service fee of $625,000.00 plus annual operating and maintenance costs. See page "EE" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from consent calendar, if any -8- 3/14/84 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-32, adopting revised settlement procedures for liability claims and rescinding Resolution No. 78-107, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "FF" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to award a purchase order contract to Falcon Services for Interim Out-of-County Trucking of Residual Solids, Specification No. 5-031, for an amount not to exceed $152,000 for a 90-day period commencing March 15, 1984 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file staff financial report for six-month period ending December 31, 1983 (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 84-33, approving agreement with the County of Orange relative to the negotiated settlement for tax exchanges on properties annexing to the Districts. See page "GG" (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 84-34, adopting a policy of allowing a District to amend a consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers when such amendments are solely related to the facilities of that District, without requiring other Districts that are party to the consolidated Master Plan to also amend said plan. See page "HH" (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -9- 3/14/84 (24) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of CEQA actions in connection with the Draft EIR on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (Mailed to Directors with Staff Summary on 3/2/84) : (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file comments on Notice mailed re preparation of EIR on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (Copies included in Draft EIR) (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated March 1, 1984, summarizing the Draft EIR on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to file a �..' Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (e) Consideration of motion establishing May 4, 1984, as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (f) Consideration of motion fixing April 11, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. , in the Districts' administrative office, as the date, time and place for public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 (28) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT post Office Box 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones. Area Code 714 540-2910 JOINT BOARDS 962-24111 Meeting Date March 14, 1984 - 7: 30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. .Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting . To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager' s Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself , particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer ' s estimate . Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award . ALL DISTRICTS No . 9(a) : Adopt Revised General Provisions and Standard Specifications . Our staff and General Counsel have recently updated the General Provisions and Standard Specifications used in connection with all Districts ' construction projects . This document, which was last revised in 1977, sets forth definitions and terms , proposal and contract requirements , legal responsibilities , etc . as well as the Districts ' standards for certain construction methods . It is used in conjunction with the Detailed Specifications prepared for each individual project. The action recommended on the agenda is to adopt the Revised General Provisions and Standard Specifications dated April 1984 . If approved by the Boards the staff will solicit printing and binding bids and award a purchase order in accordance with the procurement regulations . Any Director wishing a copy may contact Thomas M. Dawes , Deputy Chief Engineer , at ( 714 ) 540-2910 . f 3/14/84 No . 9( b) : Award Job No . I-2R-2 and I-2R-3 Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk , Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to "C" Headworks at Plant No . 2 . Phase II and III Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Job No . I-2R-2 and I-2R-3 is the continuation of improvements to the thirty-year old Bushard Trunk from Adams Avenue to "C" Headworks at Plant No . 2 . Phase I, from Ellis Avenue to Adams , was completed last November . Four bids were received ranging from a high of $1 , 984, 232 to a low of $842 , 496 submitted by Sancon Engineering , Inc . of Fountain Valley . The engineer ' s estimate was $1 . 3 million . The staff recommends award of a contract to the low bidder in the amount of $842, 496 . No . 9(c) : Award Job No . PW-097 to Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plants No . 1 and 2 . In January the Boards approved plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of the existing inter-plant sewer junction boxes at Plants No . 1 and 2 . The project includes the replacement of existing sluice gates , installation of new gates at Plant No . 2 for added system flexibility, application of a protective coating to prevent hydrogen sulfide gas corrosion , sealing of the boxes and new concrete covers for odor control . Five bids were received ranging from a high of $159, 890 to a low of $106 , 600 submitted by Advanco Constructors , Inc . of Upland . The engineer ' s estimate was $110 ,000 . The staff recommends award of a contract to the low bidder in the amount of $106 , 600 . No . 9(d) : Approval of Addendum No. 1 to Plans and Specifications for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No . 2, Job No . PW-112 , and Award of Contract. At the January meeting the Boards approved plans and specifications to install partitioning for two offices in the Operations Center at Plant No . 2 and to construct a lavatory in the refurbished building being used as a warehouse at that plant . The two actions appearing on your agenda are : 1 ) Approval of Addendum No . 1 . This addendum provides that the ceramic base tile to be used in the office partitioning will be supplied by the Districts . Our staff was able to procure tile to match the existing ceramic base that is no longer in production . -2- 3/14/84 2 ) Award of Contract . Nine bids were received ranging from a high of $42 , 994 to a low of $19, 969 submitted by Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor of Dana Point. The engineer ' s estimate was $28 , 000 . The staff recommends approval of Addendum No . 1 and award of the contract to Frank Ultimo , General Building Contractor for his low bid of $19, 969 . No . 9(e) : Approval of Plans and Specifications for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No . 2 ' s RPU' s (Remote Processing Units ) , Job No . PW-116 . The staff has completed plans and specifications for an uninterrupted power source to protect the Plant No . 2 computer remote processing units from damage from electrical voltage spikes . This hard wire installation will dampen voltage surges , and also provide a battery power source for power outages so that the RPU' s remain operable for computerized systems in the event of isolated power outages . A tentative bid date of 4-24'-84 has been established . The engineer ' s estimate is $25 , 000 . Approval of the plans and specifications is recommended . No . 9 ( f) : Approval of Plans and Specifications for Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station , Job No . PW-122 . The staff has completed plans and specifications to change the cooling water source for engines 9 & 10 at the Foster Pump Station . We presently use treated wastewater recycled from the effluent which must be pumped to the engines . This project would change the source to the oxygen generation main air compressor cooling water which is now pumped for disposal . The proposed project would utilize this higher quality water for cooling and would also reduce energy requirements by eliminating the need to pump the treated wastewater . The engineer ' s estimate is $22 , 000 . A tentative bid date of 4-24-84 has been established . The staff recommends approval of plans and specifications . No . 9 (g) : Approval of Plans and Specifications for Job No . J-11R, Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner . The existing chiller condensing unit on the laboratory air conditioner has suffered corrosion deterioration and we are experiencing frequent failures . The staff has completed plans and specifications to replace the existing unit and appurtenant piping with a similar but more efficient unit. A tentative bid date of 4-24-84 has been established. The engineer ' s estimate is $20 , 000 . Approval of the plans and specifications is recommended . -3- . w ti 3/14/84 No . 9(h) : Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No . 2 , Job No . P2-25-2 . Change Order No . 1 deducts $5 , 654 from the contract for substitution of co-plastic slide gates with stainless steel frames in lieu of the cast iron sluice gates originally specified . The staff believes that the new co-plastic material will provide better resistance to deterioration from the corrosive nature of the wastewater to which the gates are exposed . There is no time extension associated with this change order . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 1 deducting $5 , 654 from the contract. No . 9( i ) : Approval of Change Orders No . 2 & 3 to Job No. P2-27 , Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No . 2; and Acceptance of Job as Complete . 1 ) Change Order No . 2 . Change Order No . 2 adds eleven items of work totaling $50 , 242 and 220 calendar days to the contract . Included in the additional work are removal and hauling of undisclosed asphalt, conduit and pipe trench concrete, revisions to the grading and paving plan for improved drainage, an increase in the underground foul air encasement and additional paving ' work. The major items in the time extension are 71 days due to inclement weather and chlorine fumes , 63 days due to subcontractor delays in supplying the pipe and fittings , 32 days for asphalt removal and 26 days for added encasement. 2 ) Change Order No . 3 . In accordance with the terms of the contract for assessing liquidated damages , Change Order No . 3 deducts $10 ,500 for liquidated damages at $500 per day for 21 calendar days to complete the work in excess of the original contract time plus approved time extensions . The staff recommends approval of Change Orders No . 2 & 3 . 3 ) Closeout. The contractor , Advanco Constructors Inc . , has fulfilled all contractual obligations . The three change orders to the contract added a net $41 , 847 to the original bid price . The final contract price is $752, 283 . The staff recommends adoption of the resolution appearing on the agenda, accepting the work as complete, and authorizing execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. -4- 3/14/84 No . 9( j ) : Authorization to Issue Change Order B to Purchase Order No . 11705 re Analysis of Engine/Gear Box Couplings by G. S . Rasmussen . G. S . Rasmussen Associates was engaged to perform analysis to determine the cause of the premature failure of an engine driven gear box on the blowers at the Plant No . 1 activated sludge facility. Following work under the original purchase order the company recommended stiffening the coupling between the engine and gear box which would reduce the vibration and resist torsional damage to the gear boxes . The stiffer couplings were installed and operating conditions improved substantially. Change Order A authorized the firm to evaluate an alternate coupling to allow us to run the engines at less than full load, which would result in considerable energy savings . Change Order B provides for additional computer analysis made at engine start- up and stopping to more accurately determine whether an alternate coupling would further improve operating conditions . This work could not be anticipated until the analyses authorized in Change Order A were completed. The additional computer analysis confirmed that the existing stiffened couplings that are now installed will perform satisfactorily and that installation of an alternate coupling at a cost of $500 ,000 will not be necessary . It has also confirmed that we can operate at variable loads which is more energy efficient. The staff recommends approval of Change Order B to Purchase Order No . 11705 increasing the authorization $3 ,500 to an amount not to exceed $14 ,500 for the additional computer analysis . No . 9(k) : Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C" , Treatment Plant No. 2 , Job No. PW-110 ; and Acceptance of Job as Complete . 1 ) Change Order No . 1 . Change Order No . 1 provides for nine changed work items at no cost to the Districts and a time extension of 41 calendar days . The work includes miscellaneous modifications such as relocation of pipelines , removal of existing steam line, and deletion or substitution of certain materials . The 41 calendar days include 23 days of inclement weather , 6 days of District incurred delays to accommodate other treatment plant activities, and 12 days for the work modifications in several of the Change Order items . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 1 2 ) Closeout . The Contractor , Dorado Enterprises Incorporated has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the originally specified and approved extensions of time . The staff recommends -5- 3/14/84 adoption of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing �-- of the Notice of Completion as required. The final contract price is $58 ,179 . No. 9( 1 ) : Authorization to Issue a Purchase Order for Purchase and Installation of Budd Plastic Chain , Sprockets and Appurtenances , Job No . PW-114 for Retrofit and Trial at Plant No . 2 Secondary Clarifiers . The new secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 have been in operation for a little more than one year . We have recently experienced failure of the cast iron chain and attachments used to pull the skimming blades in the secondary clarifiers . The cast iron is corroding at an accelerated rate and is breaking due to the deterioration . We have found that other large metropolitan sewerage agencies with recently installed pure oxygen activated sludge treatment plants are experiencing similar failures . These agencies have retrofitted their plants with a plastic chain manufactured by the Budd Company that has proved successful to date when used under similar circumstances . The plastic chain and fittings are not subject to the corrosive attacks . Although other companies make a similar plastic chain , the Budd material , using a combination of plastic , nylon and stainless steel , is the only product we have been able to identfy with the strength necessary to withstand the strain placed on this system. Staff is recommending the purchase and installation of the Budd plastic chain , sprockets and appurtenances in one of the twelve secondary clarifiers to determine whether the material will be more reliable than the cast iron in the Districts ' appli- cation . The purchase price for the chain to retrofit one clarifier will not exceed $87 ,000 plus tax . Purchase of a new cast iron chain with sprockets and appurtenances is estimated to be $90 ,000 . If the trial proves successful , consideration will then be given to retrofitting the remaining eleven basins which, because of the failures now occurring , can be expected to require replacement equipment in the near future . The authorized local dealer for the Budd equipment is Gierlich-Mitchell Company of Los Angeles . Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to that firm for the Budd plastic chain , sprockets and appurtenances to retrofit one secondary clarifier at Plant No . 2 on a trial basis in an amount not to exceed $87,000 plus tax. -6- 3/14/84 No. 9(m) : Authorizing Installation and Evaluation of Two Candidate Systems to Remove Sulphur Content in Digester Gas to Comply with New AQMD Regulations . Presently the Districts produce approximately 3 million cubic feet of digester gas per day as a by-product of the sewage treatment process . We utilize this methane gas as an energy source to power many of our engines . Use of this resource in lieu of purchasing natural gas or diesel fuel saves the Districts about $4 million per year in energy costs . We are also able to sell excess gas to be used as a fuel by others from which we derive an annual revenue of $170 ,000 . Recently, the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) amended Rule 431 .1 which limits the allowable level for sulphur compounds in gaseous fuels . Digester gas must now have a sulphur level below 800 ppm if used as a fuel and below 250 ppm if it is sold . The sulphur level of our digester gas is currently 1200-2200 ppm. The AQMD has also set up a schedule to assure compliance with the aforementioned standards by July, 1985 . Since the digester gas is such an important and cost saving energy source for the Districts and will become even more important with the installa- tion of new gas engines in the proposed Headworks at Plant No . 1 and Outfall Booster Station at Plant No . 2, it will be necessary to install facilities to scrub the gas to enable its continued utilization as a fuel . The staff has investigated seven sulphur removal systems . Of the seven , we believe the two systems described below warrant a trial : 1 . Komax Process . This process makes use of high efficiency static mixers placed strategically with chemicals in the compressed digester gas piping . The process has not been tried on digester gas , but has been used successfully in the oil industry in an application chemically similar to that for digester gas . The expected removal efficiency is 95% . The projected annualized capital and operating cost to install this system at both plants would be $147,000 . Because the capital cost for this system is nominal , staff is recommending that a full scale facility ( 1 million cubic feet per day to treat all Plant 1 gas ) be installed at Reclamation Plant No . 1 . The maximum cost including purchase and installation of the system and operational evaluation is estimated not to exceed $36 ,000 . -7- 3/14/84 2 . Hiperion Process . This is a new process which is an extension of the Takahax process used throughout Japan to clean sulphur laden gases . The removal efficiency of this system is claimed to be 99% . Although the expected annual operating cost of this system is about the same as the Komax system, the initial capital cost would be significantly higher resulting in an annualized cost for both plants of $413,000 , about three times as much as the Komax System. However , because of the higher removal efficiency, if it proves successful , the Districts would qualify for higher AQMD emission reduction credits which could be of substantial value to US . Staff is , therefore, recommending that a pilot scale ( 80 ,000 cubic feet per day) Hiperion system be installed at Plant No . 2 which produces 2 million cubic feet per day. This pilot study will enable us to evaluate the overall cost effectiveness of this system, taking into account the higher removal efficiency and potential emission credits , as compared to the Komax system. The maximum cost to the Districts for the pilot project, which will be performed in cooperation with a joint venture of International Hiperion and P.O .E . , Inc . , is estimated not to exceed $25 ,000 . The staff recommends approval of the items appearing on the agenda, authorizing installation and evaluation on a force account basis of the full scale Komax System at Plant No . 1 for an amount not to exceed $36 ,000 and a pilot scale Hiperion System at Plant No . 2 for an amount not to exceed $25 ,000 to determine the most effective method of removing sulphur from digester gas to comply with AQMD rules and allow continued utilization of the gas as an energy source for the Districts . No. 9(n ) : Ratification of Issuance of a Purchase Order for One ( 1 ) Replacement Gear Set for Gear Boxes on the Main Sewage Pumps at "C" Headworks , Specification No . E-148 . The Districts have three main sewage pumps in "C" Headworks at Plant No . 2 which utilize a Philadelphia Gear Box, type 3424BV. Because of the critical nature of these units to the hydraulics of the treatment plant and the long delivery time ( 22-24 weeks ) it has been the Districts ' practice to keep a spare gear set in our parts inventory . Recently the pinion gear on one of the sewage pumps failed and it became necessary to use the spare set. To expedite the delivery of a replacement standby gear set, staff issued a purchase order to the manufacturer after obtaining approval from the Joint Chairman in accordance with the Board ' s purchasing policy . -8- 3/14/84 The action appearing on your agenda is to ratify the action of the staff in issuing the purchase order to Philadelphia Gear Corporation for one spare gear set for an amount of $11 , 246 .00 plus tax and freight. Staff procurement limit is $10 ,000 . No. 9(o ) : Authorizing Issuance of Purchase Order for Eight ISCO Sequential Samplers , Model No . 1680 , Specification No . E-149 After several years of experience the Districts have standardized the use of ISCO samplers for industrial waste monitoring . These samplers are battery powered, automatic units and can be left unattended in remote locations to maintain close surveillance on industrial discharges . These units are approved by EPA for providing representative samples . The Industrial Waste Division currently has six field inspectors , and two additional inspectors will start this month to assist in our increased industrial waste monitoring and control program which will require additional samplers . The staff recommends the action appearing on your agenda to authorize the issuance of a purchase order to ISCO, Inc . for eight sequential samplers , Model No . 1680 for an amount not to exceed $13 ,040 plus tax and freight . No. 9(p) : Authorization to Issue Purchase Order for One ( 1) Microtox Model 2055 Toxicity Analyzer , Microtox Reagent Starter Pack and Recorder , Specification No . E-150 . Under the Districts ' pending NPDES permit (currently scheduled for hearing by the Regional Board and EPA in July) we will be required to perform one toxicity test per week on the final effluent and one test at each Plant per month on the influent . Presently these tests are performed using the conventional bioassay method which costs approximately $270 and takes 12 hours of an analyst' s time per test . Staff has located a new toxicity analyzer manufactured by Beckman Instruments of Fullerton . The new Microtox Model 2055 Toxicity Analyzer , Reagent Starter Pack and Recorder accomplishes the test by exposing a strain of marine photo-luminescent micro-organisms to a wastewater sample . The light produced by these organisms is inhibited by toxic effects , thereby giving the required indication of toxicity. It is estimated that a considerable savings will be realized by using this new method of analysis . Initial estimates by the laboratory director are that each test will cost approximately $20 to perform. The pending permit allows the use of the Microtox method for all but one of the required toxicity tests . One test must be the Microtox and a standard bioassay run in parallel . We have also identified other uses for the new equipment including evaluation of toxic conditions prior to wastewater entering the secondary treatment facilities which will protect -9- i 3/14/84 that process from upset, and evaluation of industrial waste streams to ascertain whether there is potential for high toxicity. This added capability would be very beneficial to our operating and Industrial Waste divisions . The staff recommends the purchase of the Microtox Model 2055 Toxicity Analyzer , Reagent Starter Pack and Recorder for a total amount not to exceed $11 , 815 plus tax and freight from Beckman Instruments of Fullerton the proprietary manufacturer . No. 9(q) : Approval of Selection Committee Certification and Award of Agreement to K. P. Lindstrom & Associates for Preparation of Environmental Impact Report. As authorized by the Joint Boards , the Selection Committee has negotiated with K. P. Lindstrom & Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Updated Joint Works Master Plan Facilities . The work will include preparation of all environmental documentation required under CEQA. The consultant' s original proposal provided for a rather extensive effort at an estimated cost of $81 , 740 including printing costs of $3 ,500 . The Selection Committee reviewed the proposal with Mr. Lindstrom and the scope was reduced to reflect the minimum amount of effort needed to prepare an adequate environmental report and to utilize environmental information available from previous work . Mr . Lindstrom has suggested a phased approach which would provide for the issuance of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and receipt of comments from responsible agencies ( i .e. , Cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, AQMD, SCAG , etc . ) . If , based on these comments , a more extensive effort than anticipated is required , the scope of work and fee could be revised as needed by the Joint Boards . If this becomes necessary we would have the benefit of being able to focus on the exact amount of work necessary based on the comments received on the NOP. The negotiated maximum cost of the revised scope is $34 ,165 (plus printing and binding of the draft EIR which will be done by Districts ' staff ) , as follows : Professional Services $28 , 665 Other Costs including travel , communication , supplies , typing , etc . 5 ,500 TOTAL: $34 ,165 The Selection Committee recommends approval of the proposal of K. P . Lindstrom & Associates to prepare a Supplemental EIS/EIR for the Updated Joint Works Master Plan Facilities for a cost not -10- 3/14/84 to exceed $34,165 with the understanding that should it be necessary to increase the scope after receipt of comments on the NOP, any required additional services and fees would be nego- tiated at that time . The actions appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving an agreement for said services . Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents . Also enclosed with the agenda package is a copy of the Executive Summary of the Master Plan for the Joint Works Treatment and Disposal Facilities prepared by John Carollo Engineers for which the EIR work is being done . Any Director desiring a copy of the complete Master Plan report may contact Hilary Baker of our staff , ( 714 )540-2910 . DISTRICT NO . 1 No . 9(r ) : Receive, File and Deny Application for Leave to Present Late Claim re Alleged Damages at Versailles on the Lake Apartment Complex. On March 1 , 1983 during the intense rainstorm, the Versailles on the Lake apartment complex located at 3600 South Plaza Drive, Santa Ana experienced property damage alleged to be the result of a sewer backup. An intensive investigation was conducted by our staff . The property in question is required by code to -have backflow prevention valves because it is below grade . The investigation revealed that the valves had not been properly maintained by the owner since their installation over 10 years ago. Some were in a corroded condition and some were stuck in an open position . Thus, it was determined that the District was not at fault. Accordingly, two previous claims have been denied. The Districts have now received an Application to Present Late Claim - Carolyn Malloy, et al . , from the law office of Davis and Killian . Attached to the agenda listing is a separate memorandum from the General Counsel recommending denial of the application . DISTRICTS NO . 2 & 7 No . 9( s ) : Approving Interim Sewer Service Agreements re Property That Will be Served by District 2, District 7 or Proposed District 13 . When the Boards approved the formation of District No . 13 as part of the negotiated AB 8 tax exchange settlement with the County of Orange for new sewer service area annexations they -11- •v 3/14/84 established guidelines for interim sewer service agreements to provide temporary service to developments outside the boundaries of District 2 and 7 until District 13 is formed . With the upturn in the economy we are receiving numerous requests for such agreements for developments that are beginning to proceed. Accordingly, it appears that a number of these agreements will have to be executed with the developers before the anticipated completion of the formation of District No . 13 next year . Therefore, to facilitate handling of these matters , the staff is suggesting that the General Manager be authorized to execute Interim Sewer Service Agreements , in form approved by General Counsel , with land owners/developers to provide interim service to property that will be served by District 2 , District 7 or proposed District 13 pending completion of the reorganization proceedings . The General Counsel has prepared a standard form agreement that incorporates the following terms previously established by the Boards . - Payment of applicable fees of existing District to which the development is tributary . -Acreage fee -Connection fee -Processing fee(s ) - Establish development set forth in tract map as number of connections allowable for above fees ; and provide for payment of fees established by the Sanitation District for any additional connections . - Provide for annual user fee to be charged to connected properties and to be collected on property tax bill . - Provide for concurrence of local sewering agency ( city/special district) . - Provide for inclusion in a new Sanitation District when appropriate . Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No . 84-35 authorizing the General Manager to execute the interim sewer service agreements . DISTRICT NO . 3 No . 9 ( t) : Approval of Plans and Specifications for Contract 3-24-1 , Katella Interceptor Sewer . In May, the Directors approved an agreement with Lowry and Associates to prepare plans and specifications for the Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer in Katella Avenue from Western to -12- 3/14/84 Knott . The plans and specifications have now been completed for -- this 24" sewer which will divert flow from the overloaded Hoover Western Trunk to the Knott Interceptor system which has available capacity . The project will be constructed in Katella Avenue between Western and Knott Avenues in the City of Stanton . Thus, the name of the sewer has been changed to the Katella Interceptor Sewer because that better describes its location . A tentative bid date of April 24 , 1984 has been established . The engineer ' s estimate is $362 ,000 . The staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications . DISTRICT NO. 5 No. 9(u) : Approval of Change Order No . 3 to Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No . 5-18R. Change Order No . 3 adds $4 ,191 . 28 to the contract to relocate the Edison Company' s underground power feeders . The work was necessary in order to clear the District' s valve vault and the highway improvements constructed by the City of Newport Beach . A time extension of 28 calendar days was allowed to perform the work . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 3 adding $4 ,191 . 28 for a revised contract price of $853 , 755 .13 and a 28 calendar day time extension . DISTRICTS NO . 1 , 6 & 7 No . 9(v) : Receive and File Preliminary CEQA Actions for Facilities Proposed to be Added to the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan for District No . 1 , North Half of District No . 6 and District No . 7; and Authorize Selection Committee to Negotiate Amendment to EIR Consultant' s Agreement . Based on a report and recommendation of its consulting engineer , the District No . 7 Board , at its February 15th adjourned meeting declared its intent to amend the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers to add the Campus Relief Subtrunk and Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main , and directed the staff to proceed with preparation of preliminary environmental documentation required by CEQA. These new facilities (along with the Main Street Relief Subtrunk which will also be added to the Master Plan but for which the EIR work has been completed - see Item 9( x) ) are necessary to accommodate rapidly increasing developmental density patterns in the Irvine Business Complex recently approved by the Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach . -13- 3/14/84 Enclosed with the agenda attachments are the Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Assessments for these two projects which determine that a mitigated negative declaration can be prepared ... to comply with CEQA. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main and the Campus Relief Subtrunk . Also included is authorization for the Selection Committee to negotiate with Courton & Associates , the Districts ' present consultant on the District 1 , 6 & 7 Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers EIR, for services in connection with the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for these two projects . The staff recommends the agenda actions . DISTRICT NO . 7 No . 9(w) : Receive and File Selection Committee Certification and Approve Addendum No . 1 to Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Design Services re the Von Karman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer , Contract 7-8 . At the February 15th adjourned meeting the Board authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional engineering services required to design the approved realignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer to Von Karman Avenue . The Selection Committee has negotiated an addendum for the change of scope for a total amount not to exceed $57 ,187 as follows : Engineering services $22,187 Outside services Aerial topographic $ 900 Soils investigations 13 , 900 14 , 800 Subtotal : 36 , 987 Dual track design for inclusion of IRWD capacity* 20 , 200 Total for Addendum No. 1 : $57 ,187 *(The $20 , 200 will be totally reimbursed by Irvine Ranch Water District) . The actions appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee ' s certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 1 . Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents . -14- 3/14/84 No . 9(x) : Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Design Services re Main Street Relief Subtrunk , Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No . 7-2C-4 . At the February 15th adjourned meeting of the District 7 Board , the Directors also declared their intent to amend the Master Plan to include the Main Street Relief Subtrunk from Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard to accommodate new development in the Irvine Business Complex approved by the City of Irvine . This project was anticipated in time for it to be included in the Draft Master Plan Environmental Impact Report which will be presented to the Directors in April for certification . The action appearing on your agenda is to authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with Boyle Engineering for design of this facility. It is recommended that negotiations proceed with Boyle Engineering Corporation, the consultant that prepared the Master Plan , because of their familiarity with the sewering requirements of the Irvine Business Complex area and their design of the parallel Von Karman alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer . When an agreement has been reached the Selection Committee will submit its recommendation to the Board for approval . No . 9(y) : Approving Agreement with City of Newport Beach for Collection of District Connection Fees . District No . 7 has standard agreements with its member agencies to collect District connection fees at the time building permits are issued . This arrangement facilitates "one-stop" processing by builders and relieves the District of the burden of monitoring new development for purposes of collecting the fees . Staff has requested the City of Newport Beach, the local sewering entity in the southwestern portion of District No. 7, to enter into such an agreement with District No . 7. Newport Beach currently has similar agreements with District Nos . 5 & 6 . The agreement provides for retention of 5% of the fees collected by the City to cover their costs of administering this program. The balance is forwarded to the District monthly. Staff recommends approval of the standard agreements . -15- a 3/14/84 No . 9( z ) : Ordering Annexation No . 108 - Mahoney Annexation This 3 . 91 acre annexation is for five single family residential homes in the vicinity of Vista del Lago and La Cuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory . The local sewering agency will be the 7th Sewer Maintenance District. All applicable acreage and processing fees have been paid pursuant to the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . A one- time service fee for each lot in lieu of the District receiving a tax allocation on the property has also been paid. The staff recommends that Annexation No. 108 , Mahoney Annexation be ordered. No. 9(aa ) : Approving Agreement with State Department of Parks and Recreation for Connection and Service for Huntington State Beach, Phase II Improvements . The State of California , through its Department of Parks and Recreation , is presently constructing improvements to the Huntington State Beach . The staff has negotiated with represen- tatives of the State regarding fees associated with sanitary sewer service for Phase II of the developments . The agreement, which has been approved by the Attorney General ' s office as well as General Counsel for the District, provides for connection to the District' s Coast Trunk Sewer to accommodate the needs of the new facilities . The State will pay an initial service fee of $625 , 000 plus annual operating and maintenance costs . A similar agreement with a connection fee of $625 ,000 was approved by the Board in July, 1983 for the Phase I improvements . Staff recommends approval of the Agreement. ALL DISTRICTS Nos . 11 & 12 : Report of Executive Committee The Committee met on February 29th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of its discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . No. 13 : Financial Report for Six-Month Period Ending 12-31-83 . Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the first six months of the fiscal year . If any Directors have questions on the Statements , please call Bill Butler , Director of Finance, at 540-2910 . -16- 3/14/84 No . 14: Approving Negotiated Agreement with the County of Orange Re AB-8 Tax Exchange Settlement. Pursuant to the negotiated AB 8 tax exchange settlement with the County of Orange previously approved by the Boards , the Districts ' General Counsel and County Counsel have now completed preparation of the agreement to be executed by each District and the Board of Supervisors . The item appearing on the agenda is to adopt Resolution No . 84-33 , approving said agreement and authori- zing execution by the Chairman of each District and the Board' s Secretary. No. 15 : Adoption of Policy Concerning Amendments to Consolidated Master Plans of Trunk Sewers . In 1982-83 each of the Districts participated in a consolidation and updating of their master plans for trunk sewer facilities . The consolidated master plans are as follows : Updated & Consolidated Report of Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for District No . 1 , Northern Half of District No . 6 and District No . 7, prepared by Boyle Engineering Corp. , approved December 8, 1982 . Updated & Consolidated Report of Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2 , 3 & 11 , prepared by Lowry & Associates , approved December 8, 1982 Updated Trunk Sewer Master Plans for District 5 & the Southern Half of District 6 , prepared by Shaller & Lohr , approved June 8, 1983 . From time to time it becomes necessary for an individual District to amend its master plan for a facility that serves only that individual District . In order to accommodate the formal process of approving such amendments , staff is recommending that the Boards of Directors adopt a policy providing that when a District that is party to a consolidated master plan finds it necessary to amend the plan for a facility that serves only that District, it may do so without requiring the concurrence of other Districts that are party to the consolidated master plan . Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 84-34 establishing the above policy. -17- 3/14/84 DISTRICT NOS . 5 & 6 No . 27: Actions Re Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No . 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 In October , the Boards approved an agreement with Envirosphere Company for preparation of the EIR for the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6 . The Draft EIR has now been completed and a copy of the document with a staff summary was mailed to the Directors on March 2 . The actions appearing on your agenda are the steps necessary at this time to comply with CEQA Guidelines . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 March 5, 1984 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE February 29, 1984 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Others present: Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Joint Chairman Director Hank Frese Richard B. Edgar , Vice Joint Chairman Director Dorothy Wedel Robert Hanson Director Duane Winters Henry Wedaa Thomas L. Woodruff, General Bruce Finlayson Counsel Evelyn Hart James Wahner Staff Present: Don Smith Ruth Bailey Fred A. Harper , General Supervisor Roger Stanton Manager J. Wayne Sylvester , Absent: None Assistant General Manager Convene: 5: 30 p.m. Blake P. Anderson, Director Adjourn: 6: 30 p.m. of Operations William H. Butler , Director of Finance William N. Clarke, Superintendent Thomas M. Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer 1. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. Committee Chairman Frese reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee had met on February 15th and reviewed the first six months joint operating expenditure budget report. While the Districts have experienced significant increases in operating costs because of the new advanced treatment facilities at Plant No. 2, the expenditures to date are below the budget. The Committee also set the 1984-85 budget calendar . Mr. Frese then reviewed the following staff report: E.C. 2/29/84 Staff Report re Liability Claims Settlement Policy. In 1978 when the Boards of Directors approved self-funding of the Districts ' liability insurance, the Boards adopted policy Resolution No. 78-107 which authorized the General Counsel and staff to settle liability claims against the Districts up to the amount of $5, 000 . Under the current policy, claims in excess of $5, 000 are submitted to the Boards for review and settlement authorization. The General Counsel has recommended that the Boards consider modifying the existing policy to increase the staff and General Counsel' s limit from $5, 000 to $10, 000. The $10 , 000 limit for claims settlement authority would be consistent with the staff ' s existing procurement limit. Under the proposed revision (copy of resolution attached) , all claims greater than $10 , 000 would be submitted to the Board (s) for review and settlement approval. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. Chairman Frese stated that the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended adoption of the amended policy resolution approving an increase from $5, 000 to $10 , 000 of the Districts ' Settlement Committee ' s (General Manager , Finance Director and General Counsel) authority to settle liability claims. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation. 2) Status Report on Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority' s Capacity in Districts ' Facilities and Other Activities. In 1972 the Districts entered into two agreements with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District to provide capacity for discharge of high saline wastewater from the upper Santa Ana River basin through our Districts ' sewerage system. In 1974, the agreements were assigned to the regional Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) . The first agreement provided for 30 mgd capacity in District No. 2' s Santa Ana River Interceptor from Plant No. 1 to the Riverside County line. The project was completed in 1977 for a total cost of $22, 212, 587. (SAWPA' s portion of the cost was $14, 569, 677. ) The second agreement allows SAWPA the right to purchase up to 30 mgd capacity in the joint works treatment and disposal facilities. The price of each incremental purchase is escalated to current value based on the Engineering News Record cost index. To date, SAWPA has acquired 8 mgd capacity in the joint works. The following summarizes their capacity acquisitions to date: -2- E.C. 2/29/84 30 mgd capacity in the Santa Ana River Interceptor $14, 569 ,677 8 mgd Joint Works treatment and disposal Primary treatment $ 5, 417,987 Supplemental Treatment $ 1, 713 ,804 Sub-Total $ 7, 131,791 GRAND TOTAL $21,701, 468 SAWPA is presently discharging 2. 5 mgd into the Districts ' system for treatment and disposal. SAWPA pays the actual cost of treatment and disposal plus 10%. Staff reported that industrial dischargers to the SAWPA system are required to meet the industrial waste standards imposed by our Districts. SAWPA, however , does not have a staff for monitoring industrial wastes and has requested that our Districts enter into an agreement to provide these services to their agency. Such an agreement would be desirable from the Districts ' standpoint as it would enable us to assure ourselves that all industrial firms connected to SAWPA' s system are meeting the standards established by our Boards. A draft agreement is presently under review by our Staff and General Counsel. The Director of Operations reported that he had been asked by the EPA Region IX office to attend a meeting called by their toxic waste division and the State Department of Health Services (DOHS) regarding the Stringfellow Waste Site in Riverside County. A study of environmentally acceptable means of disposing of the ground water leaching from Stringfellow is nearing completion. Although we have not been provided a copy of the draft report, we were informed that it proposes that the wastewater be treated at an onsite treatment plant at Stringfellow prior to discharge into the SAWPA system for conveyance via the Santa Ana River Interceptor to the Districts ' treatment facilities where it would be processed through the joint works and disposed of through the outfall. We have advised EPA and DOHS that before any proposal could be considered by the Boards each regulatory agency, including the Orange County agencies, would have to endorse its recommendations and assure that the same treatment standards imposed by our Districts on industrial dischargers within our system would be strictly adhered to. -3- E.C. 2/29/84 3) Short-Term Residual Solids Management. Staff Report Processing and Disposal of Plant No. 1 Waste Activated Sludge. Due to the increase in dewatered sludge production at Plant No. 1 to comply with EPA' s 308 (a) letter of October 30th, our existing sludge dewatering facilities at this plant are overloaded with waste activated sludge residuals and we are having difficulty meeting the 22-1/2% solids requirement for disposal at Coyote Canyon Landfill. We are, therefore, proposing to treat the waste activated sludge (WAS) separately at Plant No. 1. This will produce a sludge of approximately 13% solids which would require further on-site processing to dry the WAS to the required 22-1/2% minimum. The estimated cost to do this on-site processing and disposal is $35. 50 per ton as tabulated below. An alternative short-term solution, which was approved by the Boards last November in response to EPA' s 308 (a) letter , is to contract for trucking the WAS out of the county for disposal at an existing private landfill where the 22-1/2% solids content is not a requirement. Staff has negotiated with Falcon Services, the firm that provided us with the lowest cost quote for out-of-county trucking and disposal. We estimate this approach would result in a net savings of $18. 60 per wet ton to the Districts compared to the on-site processing alternative. A major side benefit would be a reduction of odors associated with processing and storing WAS at Plant No. 1. Summarized below is the cost comparison. Costs to Process Costs to Total Cost to Process Est' d and Dispose of Dispose of & Dispose of Earth Cost/Week Addt' l Mat' 1 Orig Wet Ton & WAS (Now 2 Wet Tons) (15 loads) Labor $ 2. 70 Equipment 4. 30 Earth 2. 00 Hauling 6. 35 + $ 6. 35 Tipping Fee 6. 90 + 6. 90 $22. 25 + $13. 25 $ 35. 50 $12, 248 Quoted costs from Falcon Services to dispose of one wet ton of WAS . 16. 90 5,830 SAVINGS: $ 18. 60/wet ton $ 6,418 -4- E.C. 2/29/84 Processing and Disposal of Grit and Screenings. Presently, grit and screenings are collected in hoppers and dump trucks at the headworks of each treatment plant. This material is immediately covered with lime then covered with approximately 3 feet of earth to eliminate odor or fly problems with the intent being to batch haul the material to the landfill for final disposal after it has cured on-site for 18 months. Approximately 120 cubic yards of combined grit and screenings are produced each week (about 5 truck loads) . When mixed with earth cover and loaded to haul to a landfill, it produces a total of nearly 3 times the original quantity or about 360 cubic yards (15 truck loads) per week. Although we are not currently allowed to dispose of this material at the County landfills, the cost to dispose of this material (combined grit, screenings and earth) at Prima Desecha landfill in the south County, assuming the arrangements could be made, is tabulated below and compared with the cost of contracting for out-of-county trucking and disposal at an existing private landfill. DISTRICTS ' PROCESSING & DISPOSAL OUT-OF-COUNTY HAULING & DISPOSAL Costs to Est' d Load & Haul Est' d Costs per Quote Cost/Week to Prima Desecha Cost/Week from Falcon Services (15 loads) Labor $ . 32 $ . 32) Equipment . 54 . 54) ? $ 2, 367 Earth 6. 00 6. 00) Hauling ) � 9. 52 ) 3 16 . 90 5, 830 Tipping ) 6. 90*) $23. 28/wet $ 8,032 $23. 76/wet ton $ 8,197 *This is the standard tipping fee for dewatered sewage sludge. Staff Recommendation As an interim measure pending receipt and evaluation of proposals for private sector offsite reuse/disposal of the Districts ' sludge (RFP ' s for this long-term alternative have been issued and are due March 30th) , staff recommends authorization to enter into a negotiated contract with Falcon Services for a 90-day interim trial of out-of-county trucking and disposal of residual solids at an existing private landfill for an amount not to exceed $152, 000, calculated as follows: -5- E.C. 2/29/84 Plant No. 1 WAS (13 wks @ $5, 830) = $ 75, 790 Grit & Screenings (13 wks @ $5, 830) = 75, 790 $151, 580 Say $152, 000 This expense would be offset by $83, 434 (estimated) in processing and disposal costs of Plant No. 1 WAS under present methods for a net added cost of $68, 566. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee reviewed the sludge disposal plan approved by the Boards for submittal to EPA. The plan provides for short-term compliance by continuing to take digested dewatered sludge averaging 22-1/2% solids to the County' s Coyote Canyon Landfill (until 1988 at which time the County will close Coyote Canyon) for direct incorporation with municipal solid waste at a minimum of 10 : 1 mix. The compliance schedule also provides for out-of-county trucking to existing private landfill sites as a short-term disposal alternative on an as needed basis to meet our sludge disposal requirements. Long-term disposal options set forth in the plan include private sector off-site reuse/disposal for which RFP ' s have been issued (due March 30, 1984) and long-term co-disposal at County landfills for which discussions have been initiated by staff, if an arrangement can be worked out with the County GSA. The Committee, after reviewing the short-term alternatives at great length, concurs with the interim measures recommended by staff for short-term disposal by out-of-county trucking of up to 30 loads per week. -6- RESOLUTION NO. ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES -FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-107 WHEREAS , claims for damages alleging personal injuries, including death, and to real and personal property, made against the Districts have formerly been processed by a liability insurance carrier of the Districts; and, WHEREAS , the liability insurance presently in force on behalf of the Districts provides for a substantial measure of self-insured liability; and, WHEREAS, the District has the primary obligation to process claims and to provide legal defense for claims in matters of litigation filed against it; and, r WHEREAS, the District has the need for the retention of adjusting services and legal counsel who shall be vested with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: A minimum liability reserve is hereby established in the amount of $500 ,000. 00 for the payment of VON- claims made against the District. Said amount shall be provided for in the Districts' annual budget to insure that sufficient \wm,' funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts not covered by liabilty insurance. Section 2: Each annual budget shall provide for sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year . Section 3: A claims investigation and adjustment firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the District in an amount not to exceed $1,000 . 00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agareement approved by the General Counsel. Section 4. A committee comprised of the General Manager, Finance Director , and General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any claims made against the District for liability damages not otherwise covered by insurance by payment of a sum not to exceed $10, 000. 00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the District' s General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the District' s legal counsel within the same limits. Section 5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding $10,000 . 00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by d.✓ the Board of Directors of the defendant District or the Joint Boards in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of additional legal counsel for purposes of representing the District in the defense of any matters of litigation, wherein he determines that specialized expertise or experience are desirable or that the workload requires the utilization of outside counsel. Section 7: Resolution No. 78-107 is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1984. RE : AGENDA ITEM #7(A) California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region March 9, 1984 ITEM: 10 SUBJECT: Status of 301(h) Permit for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County BACKGROUND: Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act provides statutory authority for a waiver of secondary treatment by certain municipal discharges. This provision was amended into the Clean Water Act in 1977 and allows dischargers to the Ocean lower treatment standards than dischargers to inland waters . These waivers will save enormous capital and operation costs considering the limited impact of these discharges on the ocean. Congress specifically de- legated EPA to issue waivers and required states to certify that they agreed that no adverse impact would occur. In order to insure that less than secondary treatment would not be harmful to the ocean, EPA hired contractors to review all applications for permits . Once the application was evaluated and the impact on the ocean considered, the State could decide if it wished to certify the proposed waiver. Certi- fication would be done in California on the basis that the treatment level approved for waiver would not violate the California Ocean Plan. California agreed with E.P.A. Region IX that certification would result in joint EPA- Regional Board NPDES permits . First Public Hearina Because the discharge from Orange County was fairly good quality, although not secondary, and because the permit was about to expire, the staff worked with EPA-Region IX to. complete the process on this discharge. The Regional Board and EPA held joint hearings on the waiver and new NPDES permit on September 10, 1982. However, because of a late objection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the possible impacts on The California Brown Pelican (an endangered species) , the waiver and permit could not be granted. EPA subsequently completed a study on this issue and received concurrence from Fish and Wildlife Service that there was no impact on The Pelican from this discharge. The permit expired on June 1982 and was administra- tively extended during this period. Second Public Hearing Upon completion of the study, EPA and The Regional Board prepared a schedule for re-issuing the permit. This schedule included time for the State Board to adopt the 1983 Ocean Plan. Therefore, the waiver certification would include new Ocean Plan considerations . Our schedule would result in the first waiver of a significant municipal discharger in the nation. `..,1 As a general rule, in adopting PlPDES permits for dischargers in California as delegated by the Clean Water Act, the self-monitoring programs developed by the Regional Board are not critica' ly reviewed by EPA. This is because the programs are flexible and can be modified by the Executive Officer without further public hearings . Because EPA must be certain of the impacts on the ocean for discharges with waivers , certain criteria must be included in the monitoring program. Our ori- ginal draft permit and monitoring program appeared satisfactory to evaluate the impacts and comply with 301(h) waiver criteria. However, two weeks prior to the scheduled hearing , EPA-Region IX made significant changes to the monitoring program unilaterally. Present Status Because the revisions were so extensive and could not be evaluated prior to the Public Hearing, the matter was dropped from the February 10, 1984 agenda. The Regional Board staff believed that a monitoring program could be negotiated with EPA fairly rapidly and the hearing rescheduled. However, this does not appear to be possible. EPA Region IX has indicated that no new draft monitoring program can be prepared until (1) EPA Washington staff have decided what minimum criteria will be acceptable and (2) Comments on the EPA-Region IX redraft of February are received from the Office of Research and Development in Corvallis , Oregon. These comments would not be available until early March 1984. Proposed Schedule Regional Board staff believes the following schedule is the most appropriate for the hearing on this matter: 1. March 1984 - April : Review EPA comments and decisions (2 weeks) . 2. April 1984 - Redraft the monitoring program with EPA - Region IX staff (30 days). 3. May 1984 - Circulate the final State and EPA draft to Orange County and Cooperating Agencies* (Fish and Game, State Board, Regional Boards 1, 2, 3 , 4, & 9) and interested persons (30 days) . 4. June 1984 - Notice for hearing and review and respond to all comments (6 weeks) . 5. July 13, 1984 - Hold joint EPA-Regional Board hearings and adopt the waiverand NPDES permit. RE : AGENDA ITEM NO . 7(c) THE GENERAL COUNSEL WILL REPORT FURTHER ON THE ATTACHED MEMORANDA UNDER HIS REPORT - AGENDA ITEM #7(C) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA AGENDA ITEM #j1.3 P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE \"W/ FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 February 16, 1984 (714)962-2411 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1983 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for six months ended December 31, 1983. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first half of the 1983-84 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1983-84 budget for all Districts is $205.3 million, of which approxi- mately 87% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. CZWARATIVE BUDGET S1 (Millions of Dollars) INCREASE 1983-84 RDJJD;0� 1983-84* 1982-83* P8ZRSkM) % OF BUDXr JCwr TFO, NT 4JXOG O & M $18.0 $15.5 $ 2.5 8.8% ODLL=CN SYSM & OIFRER DISTRICT O & M 3.2 3.0 0.2 1.5 ZR OMETU PLANT CLCS`IR7CTICN AFPRaPRWICNS 39.8 39.8 -0- 19.4 DISTRICT SEMM 0CNS77aJC.TTCN APPR PR=CNS 27.1 36.6 (9.5) 13.2 DEBT SERVICE 1.9 1.9 -.0- 0.9 SUB-II?m $90.0 $96.8 $ (6.8) 43.8% C3NSn=CN RESERVES $96.8 $73.4 $ 23.4 47.2% OTHER 18.5 18.5 -0- 9.0 SLR-'TII141L $115.3 $91.9 $ 23.4 56.2% TOM FEUTU04EI S $205.3 $188.7 $ 16.6 100.0% FUZING CAIW--0VER $ 32.2 $ 46.9 $(14.7) 15.7% APPFCPRL= F 125.0 93.6 31.4 60.9 SUB-Iom $157.2 $140.5 $ 16.7 76.6% TAX ALTk=CN (1% SFw) $ 18.0 $ 16.5 $ 1.5 8.7% TAX LEVY FM WIND REDU=CN 0.2 0.2 -0- 0.1 C3NSIRtI:TICN CRANIS 4.7 7.9 (3.2) 2.3 FE6 8.8 6.3 2.5 4.3 IIBT & OR-ER 16.4 17.3 (0.9) 8.0 SIB-J101I34L $ 48.1 $ 48.2 $ (0.1) 23.4% TOM FUZING $205.3 $188.7 $ 16.6 100.0% r..d *ADJUSTED FLR INTER--DISTRICT TRNZS CTICNS Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects �.✓ and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1983-84 which were accrued in 1982-83 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $8.3 million for the first half of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits. We presently have funds with the County Treasurer's commingled investments to take advantage of the currently higher yield. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if the staff experiences some unexpected expenditures, they ate reviewed by the Committee. The major items that have occurred to date that impact the Joint Operating expenditures are (1) additional V employees required to operate and to maintain the expanded treatment plants and the rising cost of labor and benefits, (2) additional expenditures associated with sewage solids treatment and disposal, (3) increased electrical energy costs (4) a prior year inventory expense adjustment, and (5) higher operations and maintenance costs for the new secondary treatment facilities at Plant 2. Salaries and Wages - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, considerable payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Unemployment insurance premiums have been reduced to zero because claim experience is far below reserve levels. Most other benefit accounts will also recognize considerable savings because of unfilled positions mentioned above under Salaries and Wages. Chargebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses charged back to CORF through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants capital expansion, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion and maintenance and repair of said systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective Districts. Gasoline, Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. -2- Insurance - Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter. Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county yid travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurances, and pro-rata cost of self-funded liability insurance program. Memberships - Includes cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA and other organizations. Office Expense - This account, which includes various types of office supplies, stationery and related items is actually within budget, but our budget forecast number may be too low as a programming error resulted in inaccurate inventory expenses for prior years in this account. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. As this is a high priority item, staff has been experimenting with various odor control chemicals including chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, potasium permanganate and ferric chloride. The approximate $3,000 per day expenditure may increase prior to year-end as we treat additional volumes of wastewater. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to maintain compliance with NPDES permit requirements and are presently running below the budget allocation. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, etc. are within budget. Contractual .Services - The major item is gate fees at the Coyote Canyon land- fill. Charges are expected to stay under budget. `..' Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and Publications - The budget appears to be adequate for this item, and will level out by year-end. Rents and Leases - Equipment - Due to a change in budget procedures and some major unanticipated outfall engine repairs, this account may realize expenses in excess of our budget projections. Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of Large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the allocation system for these charges. Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. This year we have experienced an extraordinary repair expense to the #9 outfall engine at the Foster Outfall Booster Pumping Station, which has cost $192,000 to repair. Outfall Engine No. 10 also requires approximately $163,000 in repairs, which will be reflected in the next quarterly report. -3- Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also contains the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel, Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required additional staff and Board travel. Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power which has increased substantially in the past few years due to the increased cost of petroleum to the electrical- utility companies and a switch to peak rate billing based on "time-of-day" power useage. Expense is also increasing due to rising demand at our new facilities. A significant portion of the power budget is for the Pure Oxygen Activated Sludge Plant at Plant 2. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere. Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. This account reflects an inventory adjustment made after the staff completed a physical- inventory of the warehouse late in the fiscal year that was recorded in the new fiscal year. Allocation to Districts and CORF - This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies, and services overhead chargebacks to the individual .Districts and CORF. V CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 55% (including reserves) of each District's budget requirements for 1983-84. During the first six months, $2.94 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital .Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro rata share of the maximum 1% basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 3% ($.03 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. Under Jarvis-Gann, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. The 1983-84 levy was waived for Districts 2, 3 and 7, and debt service will be financed by a transfer from other funds. `.d Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB fund up to 87h% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. Estimates reflect anticipated payments based on receipt of our full secondary treatment waiver and -4- grant funding of those eligible projects indicated on CORF Schedule B-1 at 80% (net) of project cost, except For the $5.5 million hydraulic reliability project at Plant No. 2 (P2-25-2) , for which we expect to receive only 30% grant financing. Fees - With the exception of District 1, all .Districts now have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. Staff will be recommending that District No. 1 consider implementation of a connection fee program consistent with those of other Districts, beginning in 1984-85. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by all seven Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 5 and 6. Annexation fee revenue is undeterminable and, thus, not included in the estimates unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA and IRWD, including the capital replacement charge. Joint Works Equity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities inter- district equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction as discussed below. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) . . Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $1.9 million. Share of Joint Operating - Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details) . District Operating and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual District's general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operation, maintenance and repair of the respective District's collection systems. �..d -5- S ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1/30/84 SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING/WORKING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 APPROVED - BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS 1983-84 EXPENDITURES BUDGET Salaries & Wades 9,139,000 3,896,772 5,242,228 Payroll Benefits 1,996,000 827,904 1,168,096 TOTAL PAYROLL 11,135,000 4,724,676 6,410,324 Less: Chargeouts to DISTS & CORF (3,020,000) (918,550) (2,101,450) NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL 8,115,000 3,806,126 4,308,874 MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Diesel 285,000 85,851 199,149 Insurance 200,000 154,353 45,647 Memberships 18,000 1,200 16,800 Office Expense 57,000 39,537 17,463 Chlorine & Odor Control 1,490,000 627,020 862,980 Chemical Coagulants 700,000 319,216 380,784 Other Operating Supplies 300,000 131,262 168,738 Contractual Services 906,000 389,010 516,990 Professional Services 171,000 87,982 83,018 Printing & Publication 69,000 40,061 28,939 Equipment Rental 45,000 80,690 (35,690) Repairs & Maintenance 1,290,000 795,343 494,657 Research & Monitoring. 200,000 88,260 111,740 Travel, Meeting & Training 50,000 19,335 30,665 Uncollectable Accounts 2,000 -0- 2,000 Utilities 4,725,000 1,972,865 2,752,135 Other Expenses 95,000 40,620 54,380 Prior Years Expenses 50,000 94,358 (44,358) ,Jon Operating Expenses 10,000 128 9,872 TOTAL MATERIALS & SERVICES 10,663,000 4,967,091- 51695,909 Less: ALLOCATION TO DISTS & CORF (118,000) (25,125) (92,875) NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS & SERVICES 10,545,000 4,941,966 5,603,034 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 18,660,000 8,748,092 91911,908 REVENUES Revenues (620,000) (282,620) (337,380) Less: Allocation to DISTS & CORF -0- 680 (680) NET JOINT OPERATING REVENUES (620,000) (281,940) (338,060) NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 18,040,000 8,466,152 9,573,848 UALLONAGE DATE M.G. FLOW CHARGES DISTRICT bUiXiET TO D= BUDGET TO DATE 1 9,479 4,913 2,067,000 987,153 2 25,912 13,171 5,637,000 2,646,519 3 25,981 13,131 5,665,000 2,638,900 5 4,825 2,393 1,052,000 480,877 6 5,256 2,708 1,146,000 544,374 7 5,212 2,637 1,136,000 529,981 11 6,132 3,174 1,337,000 638,348 82,797 42,127 18,040,000 8,466,152 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 1/30/84 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 28,162,096 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) 61,875 34,318 27,557 Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 1,190,000 539,686 650,314 Federal and State Construction Grants 426,000 34,822 391,178 Connection Fees -0- -0- -0- Other Fees 711,000 150,909 560,091 Sale of Capacity Rights 277,000 -0- 277,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 680,000 479,383 200,617 Other 298,000 -0- 298,000 Total Revenue 3,643,875 1,239,118 2,404,757 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 29,401,214 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 8,305,207 266,489 8,038,718 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 535,000 5,668 529,332 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 81,288 75,381 5,907 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,067,000 987,153 1,079,847 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements -0- -0- District Operating & Other Expenditures 227,500 48,253 179,247 Total Expenditures 11,215,995 1,382,944 9,833,051 Ending Fund Balances 28,018,270 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7-1-83 & Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Districts 1, 6 & 7 Master Plan 24,214 5,668 29,882 Sub-Total 24,214 5,668 29,882 Share of Joint Works 1,348,551 266,489 (121,702) 1,493,338 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 1,348,551 266,489 (121,702) 1,493,338 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 82,595 82,595 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 5,596,961 5,596,961 Treatment Facilities -0- -0- Disposal Facilities 11,593 11,593 General Plant and Admin Facil 13,709 13,709 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 18,125,235 (15,670) 121,702 18,231,267 Other assets at cost less amortization \fts" Total Property Plant & Equip 25,202,858 256,487 -0- 25,459,345 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW 1-WV 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 143,849,044 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) -0- 594 (594) Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 5,189,000 2,420,188 2,768,812 Federal and State Construction Grants 1,414,000 114,763 1,299,237 Connection Fees 580,000 238,316 341,684 Other Fees 2,742,000 2,248,764 493,236 Sale of Capacity Rights 917,000 -0- 917,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 4,024,000 3,362,271 661,729 Other -0- -0- -0- Total Revenue 14,866,000 8,384,896 _6,481,104 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 152,233,940 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 44,655,687 882,210 43,773,477 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 17,338,753 369,638 16,969,115 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 395,381 70,022 325,359 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,637,000 2,646,519 2,990,481 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements -0- -0- -0- District Operating & Other Expenditures 661,800 158,599 503,201 Total Expenditures 68,688,621 4,126,988 64,561,633 ;ding Fund Balances 148,106,952 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Transfer To Balance 7/1/83 Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Control 189 189 Gate Fullerton/Brea Interceptor 137,461 137,461 Euclid Trunk Relief 83,073 83,073 Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to SARI 5,000 6,661 11,661 Fairview West Interceptor Sewer 45,000 93,558 138,558 District 13 Formation Share 51,658 21,106 72,764 Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station Modifn 8,690 19,116 27,806 District 2 & 7 Flow Analysis 25,476 719 26,195 Districts 2, 3 & 11 Master Plan 48,947 7,755 56,702 Sub-Total 184,771 369,638 554,409 Share of Joint Works 4,464,375 882,210 (402,893) 4,943,692 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 4,464,375 882,210 (402,893) 4,943,692 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 420,384 420,384 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 44,053,319 44,053,319 Treatment Facilities 1,186 1,186 Disposal Facilities 33,172 33,172 ,3eneral Plant and Admin Facil 33,581 33,581 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 60,003,539 (51,877) 402,893 60,354,555 Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equip 109,194,327 1,199,971 -0- 110,394,298 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 138,594,429 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) -0- 582 (582) Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 6,686,000 3,169,842 3,516,158 Federal and State Construction Grants 1,476,000 120,597 1,355,403 Connection Fees 336,000 255,015 80,985 Other Fees 1,336,000 526,293 809,707 Sale of Capacity Rights 916,000 -0- 916,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 3,522,000 2,469,726 1,052,274 Other 320,000 -0- 320,000 Total Revenue 14,592,000 6,542,055 8,049,945 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 145,136,484 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 40,082,069 923,141 39,158,928 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 9,959,623 848,811 9,110,812 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 616,807 75,772 541,035 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,665,000 2,638,899 3,026,101 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements -0- -0- -0- District Operating & Other Expenditures 661,000 308,889 352,111 Total Expenditures 56,984,499 4,795,512 52,188,987 ,ding Fund Balances 140,340,972 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Transfer To Balance 7/1/83 Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Orangethorpe Relief RCH 16A Misc 63 63 Charge Knott Interceptor RCH 7 Late Chg 12,506 12,506 Los Alamitos Blvd. Trench Reconst. 4,453 4,453 Purchase 4-MGD Miller-Holder 750,000 (750,000) -0- Hoover-Western Relief-Lampson & 7,900 43,594 51,494 Katella Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief 2,500 20,340 22,840 Districts 2, 3 & 11 Master Plan 48,947 7,516 56,463 3 & 7 Flow Monitoring Program 10,339 10,339 Sub-Total 59,347 848,811 (750,000) _ 158,158 Share of Joint Works 4,671,500 923,141 (421,586) 5,173,055 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 4,671,500 923,141 (421,586) 5,173,055 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 280,231 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 52,580,696 750,000 53,330,696 Treatment Facilities 15,036 15,036 Disposal Facilities 28,419 28,419 �iGeneral Plant and Admin Facil 52,006 52,006 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 62,787,413 (54,283) 421,586 63,154,716 Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equip 120,474,648 1,717,669 -0- 122,192,317 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW `; 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 24,275,441 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) 20,943 16,765 4,178 Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 1,361,200 627,172 734,028 Federal and State Construction Grants 314,000 25,619 288,381 Connection Fees 130,000 66,822 63,178 Other Fees 651,000 331,270 319,730 Sale of Capacity Rights 203,000 -0- 203,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 636,300 419,521 216,779 Other 42,000 -0- 42,000 Total Revenue 3,358,443 1,487,169 _1,871,274 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 25,762,610 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 3,933,983 196,113 3,737,870 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 5,194,340 679,528 4,514,812 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 24,565 22,191 2,374 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,052,000 480,877 571,123 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 7,650 -0- 7,650 District Operating & Other Expenditures 481,550 169,023 312,527 Total Expenditures 10,694,088 1,547,732 9,146,356 Ending Fund Balances 24,214,878 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Transfer To Balance CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 7/l/83 Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 A & B Vault Wet Protection 5 & 6 14 (14) -0- Rehab Peninsula Trunk 1,812 (1,812) -0- 5 & 6 Master Plan 11,320 187 11,507 Rehab & Relocate PCH Trunk 141,214 677,317 (3,439) 815,092 PCH Trunk Report 5 & 6 3,758 61 (3,819) -0- Modify FM Cross PCH at Bitter 128,678 1,977 130,655 Point 5 & 6 Reline Coast Hwy. 5 & 6 91151 (9,151) -0- Sub-Total 295,947 679,528 (18,221) 957,254 Share of Joint Works 992,414 196,113 (89,562) 1,098,965 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 992,414 196,113 (89,562) 1,098,965 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 6,231 6,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 6,842,857 12,590 6,855,447 Treatment Facilities 7,347 7,347 Disposal Facilities 7,115 7,115 General Plant and Admin Facil 12,643 12,643 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 13,338,571 (11,532) 89,562 13,416,601 Other assets at cost less amort. 38,268 (7,809) 5,631 36,090 Total Property Plant & Equip 21,541,393 856,300 -0- 22,397,693 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 13,826,975 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) 17,916 9,854 8,062 Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 816,000 376,273 439,727 Federal and State Construction Grants 277,000 22,424 254,576 Connection Fees 171,000 59,520 111,480 Other Fees 926,000 412,548 513,452 Sale of Capacity.Rights 179,000 -0- 179,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 332,000 197,988 134,012 Other -0- -0- -0- Total Revenue 2,718,916 1,078,607 1,640,309 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 14,905,582 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 3,016,520 171,672 2,844,848 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 1,322,998 6,461 1,316,537 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 29,046 26,888 2,158 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,146,000 544,374 601,626 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements -0- -0- -0- District Operating & Other Expenditures 231,200 41,034 190,166 Total Expenditures 5,745,764 790,429 4,955,335 Ending Fund Balances 14,115,153 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Transfer To Balance 7/l/83 Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: PCH Trunk Report 5 & 6 1,253 (61) (1,192) -0- A & B Vault Wet Protection 5 & 6 5 (5) -0- 5 & 6 Master Plan 11,321 188 11,509 Districts 1, 6 & 7 Master Plan 24,214 5,680 29,894 Modify FM Cross PCH at Bitter 42,973 659 43,632 Point 5 & 6 Reline Coast Hwy. 5 & 6 3,050 (3,050) -0- Sub-Total 82,816 6,461 (4,242) 85,035 Share of Joint Works 868,735 171,672 (78,400) 962,007 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 868,735 171,672 (78,400) 962,007 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 562 562 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 1,109,472 3,050 1,112,522 Treatment Facilities 2,653 2,653 Disposal Facilities 7,394 7,394 �40/General Plant and Admin Facil 16,740 16,740 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 11,676,256 (10,095) 78,400 11,744,561 Other assets at cost less (606) 1,192 586 amortization Total Property Plant & Equip 13,764,628 167t432 -0- 13,932,060 s COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 48,370,108 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) -0- 1,076 (1,076) Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 1,817,400 819,859 997,541 Federal and State Construction Grants 458,000 37,298 420,702 Connection Fees 132,000 141,546 (9,546) Other Fees 557,000 448,370 108,630 Sale of Capacity Rights 294,000 -0- 294,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 1,466,471 1,039,702 426,769 Other -0- -0- -0- Total Revenue 4,724,871 2,487,851 2,237,020 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 50,857,959 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 14,363,993 285,629 14,078,364 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 6,084,348 99,441 5,984,907 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 671,253 409,255 261,998 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,136,000 529,981 606,019 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements -0- -0- -0- District Operating & Other Expenditures 464,250 184,164 280,086 Total Expenditures 22,719,844 1,508,470 21,211,374 '.r/ Ending Fund Balances 49,349,489 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Transfer To Balance 7 1 83 Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Tustin-Orange Reach 19 82,767 82,767 So. Irvine Lift Stn & Relief 132 132 Subtrunk District 13 Formation Share 2,719 1,111 3,830 Districts 2 & 7 Flow Analysis 16,204 9,512 25,716 Districts 1, 6 & 7 Master Plan 24,214 51919 30,133 Sub-Total 43,137 99,441 _ 142,578 Share of Joint Works 1,445,408 285,629 (130,443) 1,600,594 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 1,445,408 285,629 (130,443Y 1,600,594 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP_: Land and Property Rights 276,454 276,454 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 18,570,000 18,570,000 Treatment Facilities -0- -0- Disposal Facilities 10,782 10,782 ,,,.� General Plant and Admin Facil 12,440 12,440 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 19,427,047 (16,796) 130,443 19,540,694 Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equip 39,785,268 368,274 -0- 40,153,542 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/83 BUDGET REVIEW �.d 1983-84 Remaining Budget Year-To-Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 32,076,304 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) 62,802 33,464 29,338 Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 1,500,000 700,373 799,627 Federal and State Construction Grants 352,000 28,658 323,342 Connection Fees 90,000 775,836 (685,836) Other Fees 399,000 69,687 329,313 Sale of Capacity Rights 11,945,000 -0- 11,945,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 1,482,000 1,228,964 253,036 Other 21,000 -0- 21,000 Total Revenue 15,851,802 2,836,982 13,014,820 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 34,913,286 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 11,590,936 219,375 11,371,561 District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 9,043,721 155,876 8,887,845 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 77,175 19,538 57,637 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,337,000 638,348 698,652 Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 18,000 156,764 (138,764) District Operating & Other Expenditures 420,000 110,533 309,467 Total Expenditures 22,486,832 1,300,434 21,186,398 \.d Ending Fund Balances 33,612,852 FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Transfer To Balance 7/l/83 Additions Fixed Assets 12 31 83 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Newland-Banning Pump Station 5,508 5,508 Abandonment Districts 2, 3 & 11 Master Plan 9,906 2,280 12,186 Slater Force Main 536 (536) -0- Coast Hwy. Trunk 3,552,309 148,624 3,700,933 Sub-Total 3,562,751 155,876 3,718,627 Share of Joint Works 1,110,133 219,375 (100,185) 1,229,323 CIP Integration Adjustment Sub-Total 1,110,133 219,375 (100,185) 1,229,323 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,986 146,986 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 14,786,961 (155,970) 14,630,991 Treatment Facilities -0- -0- Disposal Facilities 3,053 3,053 General Plant and Admin Facil 29,031 29,031 ./Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 14,920,773 (12,901) 100,185 15,008,057 Other assets at cost less 2,554 (2,189) 365 amortization _ Total Property Plant & Equip 34,562,242 204,191 -0- 34,766,433 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS MARCH 14, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. FUND NC 9159 - J7 DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/01/84 PAGE I €PORT--4UMBER-AP44 -- -__- -- � � COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 WAPRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ,. CG7555---__-__-_-A-&-P SC.RVI-CCS9-•INC. -- 5580.-99 VALVES---- 067556 ALK OIL CO. $19043.53 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ,i 067557 ACTION INSTRUMENTS9 INC. $267.06 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06755R. ---- -----ADV ANC ED._CFFICE--SERVICES-.._....-------- -.- -..-.... $649.50-------.____ -OFFICE-MACHINES. C67559 ADVANCC CCNSTRUCTORS9 INC- $909985.54 CONTRACTOR P2-27 G67560 AMERICAN AIR FILTER• INC- $1.423.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067561--- -•----- - ---AMER IC•AN.-COMRRESSOR--CO i327-.55- COMPR-ESSOR-PARTS--- 067562 AN,ERON• INC. - $795.36 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT - - m 067563 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.254.57 PIPE SUPPLIES Z 667564- - .- - AGUA-BEN-CORK. --- ---------------- ------ - -------•- -- $22#699.52 - - --- -CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 367565 ARROW-RISCO• INC. $24-46 TRUCK PARTS C67566 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS $19270.25 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT �-� G67567 -- -- •-------ASSOCIATED-CONCRETE-RR-OD.-t-INC - ----$-19-84-7-.76- BU-1L0.1NG-MATE-RIALS-- 067568 ASSOCTATEC LABORATORIES $165.00 LAB ANALYSIS 3 G675F.5 ATLAS RADIATOR SERVICE 1852.35 TRUCK REPAIRS I G67.70-• ------AWARDSBTRCPHIFS-- ---- ---- -------•----------------$62.O1--------RETIREMENT--PLACQUES 4:k fl67571 CAKER PLY6000 CO.• INC. S1.098.21 SMALL HARDWARE r. 00 067572 13ECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $29809.80 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/CONTROL EQUIPMENT �67573----------- --G•AUL-8ERGERON --- S30T00- EMP-LOYEE-M-IL-EAGE- --•---- ---------.- -. » 067574 PERTECH S189.15 TOOLS :I> C-67575 BEVCO $37-0.44 ELECTRIC CART PARTS r 067576 -- - --. RL-AKE•--MOFFITT-R--70PNE- --- -- - - -- 5589.25- -- OFFICE--SUPPL-IES --- - r 067577 BOMAR MAGNETO SERVICES INC. S2.307.61 ENGINE PARTS d 06757P BROOKS INSTRUMENTS $37.10 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .--. %67579- • -- ------C-B-R--RECChDI-T-IONING-CO.--- 5185.00 C/) 667580 CPT CALIFCRNIA• INC. $80.80 WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE 067581 CS COMPANY $859.35 VALVES ,-, 067592 - - - ---CALIFORNIA--INSTITUTE-OF-TECHNOLOGY----------- -- -$2.204.86-------DEEP-.00EAN_SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY C-) 1167563 CAP.MENITA FORD TRUCK SALES• IN $709.00 TRUCK PARTS G67EF4 JOHN CAROLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN $2.877.64 TRAINING AND START-UP P2-23-6 i.675R5 - ART-CARR-TRANSMISSION- - --S4T2.A8-- -TRUCK-REPAIRS-- 067586 JOHN CASON $751.68 ENGINE PARTS i 0675A7 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. $19968.42 FERRIC CHLORIDE TANK RENTAL 6675PR - CHEVRON•-U.S.A.9, INC. - --- - -- - -- $79081.1I— --- ENGINE- OIL- -- _ l G675ES CLARK DYE HARDWARE $27.98 SMALL HARDWARE „ 667�56 CONbRESSICKAL STAFF DIRECTORY $82.50 PUBLICATIONS G67591 - - - CONNELL--6HEYROLET----•---• -----_- .--53v100.8d -TRUCK -PARTS---... 067592 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $19808.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067593 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $39219.20 ENGINE PARTS ' C67594 COUNTY WICE AMC - - - - $229.64 - TRUCK PARTS "d 66755b CHARLES P. CROWLEY CO- S343.5C PUMP PARTS f6755b CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $120.30 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 067557 DAILY PILCT -- ----_--- - -.-537.-75 --LEGALADVERT-ISING 067598 BEK IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS $45.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES , 067599 DATA TECH S67.27 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ('•67600 -PETER C.-CAVID CO. • - - __.___._.__._.___.._.._.....___._.$24*300.90 - _...__ CONTRACTOR PW-102to ; 'i. I fV FUND NO 9199 - JT LIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 FACE 2 ..-...----REPORT -NUMBER-AP43---. I ! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I ; CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 'I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 067601- -- --DECK ER--iNS?RUMENT-SUPPL--Y-••COr----------•-- ---- -3i25s90-----CONTROL EQUIPMENT ---_._ __._.._._-..._._..... _ ....__...._-.I 067CO2 DECO $504.53 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1:0 067603 DELAFIELO CCRP. $242.02 HOSE 067604 DEVCON• CORP. _.__...._.--_ .. __.._.... _ _._... . .-..___ __. $2136 18--- PAINT SUPPLIES 6676G5 DICKSONS $101.76 ICE MAKER 067666 DIGIOYNE COMPUTER SERVICES * $968.00 MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE 067667 -8-PUBL-ICATIONS--------- --- - -- -----3295.98-------- PUBL-ICATIONS--''---•--__.--___ .-----.-.-_-___ .. !rn 06760E DRIVER TESTING CENTER $84.00 DRIVER EXAMS "I ; M 067609 DUMAS DIESEL INJECTION $318.64 ENGINE PARTS d 06761D ....... - EASTMANs--INC. - - ----..__._._ ._... - -. _..___ $1s400s35 __..._. .___.OFF ICE SUPPLIES :. 067611 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. $52.56 SCROLL BALANCING, CENTRIFUGES C67612 ELLSWOPTIi TRUCK 8 AUTO $68.00 TRUCK PARTS ~' 067613 ENCHANTERS -bNC• - - ------ ------$3s500-•00-- -OCEAN-MONITORING------ -- - --- -- -- - -..�'I �r��r77 067614 FAMILIAN PIPE 9 SUPPLY $781.64 PIPE SUPPLIES I„I 3 067615 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $24.00 FREIGHT 067616 ------ -FILTER- SUPPLY-CO•-..--....-_--_. --- --....__ _.._. 51�291.07------..__.... ENGINE-PARTS. _ _. - - .... . 067617 FIRST KETALSS INC. $161.70 TOOLS C� 067618 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $101119.11 PIPE SUPPLIES ' 1 067619-- - - -- ----FI SHE R-SC-I-ENTIFTC-C-O• -- - ------ ----S95:33-- --LAB--SUPPL-iES ---.--••--- 067620 FIVE STAR FISH FARMS $60.00 LAB SPECIMENS 067621 FLAT d VERTICAL CONCRETE $372.00 CORE DRILLING d r---• 067622 - --FOOTHIL-L GARDEN- EQUIPMENT------- -- ------ 193:07-----------TRUCK -PARTS-- - -- _- ._ - . .. . �11 967623 CLIFFORC A. FORKERT $160.00 SURVEY P2-27 I' b 667624 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $888.19 FILM PROCESSING b---4 067625 - -- - - DONALD-L-r-FOX--B-ASSOCI 875s-00- -SAFETY-CONSUL-TINB 067626 THE FOXBORO COMPANY $153.13 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES � 067627 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $993.11 COMPRESSOR PARTS OC-762P FREDSON-------._.......__._ .... --- - --... _ -- --%84.76.....---- - TOOLS-------- - __....._ _.. _.. . ._. . 067629 CITY OF FULLERTON S14.00 WATER USEAGE " !Cn 667630 GW MAINTEAANCE9 INC. $318.52 PUMP REPAIRS 067631 - -GARRATT-CALL-AHAN COMPANY---------- ----- - -$508r80---- CONDUC-TIV-ITY-ME-TER- - - --' 067632 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $468.33 TELEPHONE i. 067633 H&M DIESEL MACHINE $670.71 TRUCK REPAIRS P67634 HACH COMPANY _ _. ._. .. $274.07 - LAB SUPPLIES „I 067635 FALSTCC 8 NOGGAN9 INC. $132.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067636 CHARLES G. HARDYS INC. 1312.95 BUILDING MATERIALS G67637 - HARTGE-ENGINEERING-AND--CONSTRUCT-I ON- CO. - --- -$22S312.50------ --- -ENGR.---I--2R1 -1-2R2 -PW-099------'--_ . _. .._ 067636 E.G. HELLERsS SON♦ INC. S171.48 TOOLS i. 0E7E39 HILTIs INC* S19.66 TRUCK PARTS P67640 HOLCHEMs - INC. $49045.75 - - CAUSTIC SODA C-67641 HONE.YWELL9 INC. $202.99 STRIP CHARTS 067642 HONFYWELLS INC. $238.81 THERMOSTAT 967643 HOOSIER PLASTIC FABRICATION -____ __... $591-•90 ---- - -SMALL-HARDWARE- 067644 HORIZON NIGH-REACH $19357.17 LIFT EQUIPMENT 067645 R.S. HUGHES CO.s INC. $82.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 06764E HUNTINGTON PEACH RUBPER- S7AMP- -- - $103s4E OFFICE -SUPPLIES PIS n t ~ v puwo xc e199 - oT nxsv ocn^Iws CAPITAL pnoccnx/mn omc e/oo/o^ p*oc a ' - ---_-_-------- -----'-- epon-T-wymnEn-A CLAIMS PAID 02/98/84 -----------'---'--- |' WARRANT v�moon xnnow/ o�ocp�pnnm "" "' ~~ | i' .'/ ' _ PARTS . LE ....,' .^~~.^..-_- PUMP - SERVICE -.'.--'.- PUMP . .... - 06/65o /xov-Cvnpumr "^ u9* 6o FLOW-MONITORING =x^E - '^ .~-^ IT _' ' ._13._'''' ..'.^ ...^...' ..'. ...^ ~^.. ..^' CORP�7652 ITT � ` � CO. 1606.73 PIPE SUPPLIES ..,~.._ 067654 Imsnxn pxpcx *252.13 nrr|cc ooppL|co »arano IwLxwo cMpIxc cuozpwcmT co. w^.ua Tnoxu paxvs 0676s6'-- -----/mmTxopsw7oTxow waoxurnxv"Iwc-�---'---- - --- --u�a�.er ��'-- LAB swppL|cs 087657 Immxo xmr.^a orr|cc soppL/cs "-- r676!�u Ixrcpox xrcn/cx $19100.00 Txwx xswTxL ' varaoy - - 'zvvIws-Imcuorw,AL­'L^woSC Aps-------'- e.sao.ou-----' -PLAN T-w*/orcwAw ' ooraoo xxwxw ocxnIwss o ouppu x818.32 osAn|wu xu"pL|cs oare o� xc�uo mx�cu ENGINEERING CO- x^u.o^ RUBBER px000xrx . o67662 - - - xIcw/v pxcxFIcco^------------- --- --- m69650.00 '-'----cnwrnxoTon pw-108 - ------' oores xzwu ecxxxms. INC. o49335.03 ocAn|wu soprL|sx ' cm mr6** L.p.w.u.. INC. xoon.x^ wEm|wo soppL/cs ' oa���n �� �n�xu»-«-�s��sn- -------�-�amn.00'-------'sswsn-onwwsa7+owpcs-ncrow x --_---_-_ .� .. -_ ~___-----_---_-__-- oe7aea munocn coLon LAB x15.16 r|Lw pno:cssnmn 067667 Lzz Lcxnm $113,56 cuwpcxswcc cxpswsco � o if,roEll ' - '� '- - LcE -9-no-cnmpoLrIms'cwGx^-'------' -- -----�--$11.716.00 -'--- -swux.' pu-5x-z ^ mreop LIox,xwn cInrpIouTnnu' INC. $o.a^a.yo cLEcTn|xxL soppL/cy t= 1167670 K.P. L/woomon x Asxunm/co m.705.87 cwGx. ocExw wx/vm xspowss ~-" oaran --- -- Louxv-o-«nSocI-« 963e.5n--------Ewan-.-2-24-,-e-e5r-4-2}----------------- -' o67672 pxcn Txocxo. INC. *uuo.aa Tnonx pxxTs ' srf 73 nxxvvc cLcc7nowIcs $76^28 pxucn yuppL/cs fio7674 ' - '-rnxcSn0 -cw1wIu»L co.----------'---'-------- **.zoo.ou -------oxoor|n sooa o67675 wcw«urcn-cxoo xuppL, co. S69*.62 Sxxu oAnowxmc --' »6767^ wcnx comSoLIox/cu ux/rx u6.00 wArcn ossAoE mn 067677 ' '- - oconnc-u-o.-mnnn^m-Go..-Im xer,uas.00---------oow7nAnTox-pw-.Io6'-------------------- '-- - ooraru *oTnpnLx, INC. $93.28 cLccTn|cAL soppL/cs H 067679 romcxc powcx ponoucm xo*o.en noxu oAnowxxc 067+xo -- '- wxrcL-ocn.-� - -- -- ---- - -' --- - m,o7o.00-- --- 7cLcp*ows sYs7sw sTonv - -' - . omom mmzomAL cxno ncsIorcx m9032.a6 urr|:c soppL|ss � 06761,2 xA/IumxL FILTER mcnI« CORP. o3010.67 r|LTcx ,xess BELTS ourano - wATIumxL-SANITARY-SuvrL*�-----'---------------'--' 'suppLvsx-------------- --- - - -' `. ooran4 THE owrAn7 CORP x209.06 ocTcn oarous oLvwpxc c*snxc»L co. u309841.18 cxLoo|wc .i o6ravo oxumnc coowTv xom PARTS on~ ' ' - -- *96.81 - 7xocx pAn7o ` 367Er7 un�wcc coow/Y uLuEpxIwr *29.68 nLocpn|wr so,pL|e ' »or�m onxmoc vxmr o r�r`xmo co. xo o�o m vxmss � , . . . o67689 . cooxv, or uxxwuc Sz"epo.on 'pxs-cxpLovwcwr' sxxxS - - - - '. omrcyv co. or nn^wsc-xoozrnx oummuLn *^r"xoo.00 ooYnrE xxwrow GATE rscs O ` c6/651 coowTr sx^I,xrzom uxo,p/crs or nnawop :oowTv $u.u*v.00 xcpLcw|xo woxxexS' oomp' pown � / '| : �o�» - ,ps- �muos�o/cx. INC.-�wc. - --- - -- - - - �n�o.r� - px�w7suppusu 1 � I -I= FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 PACE 4 - - -__ --- ---- - - -- --- - ---- - --RE-PORT-NUMBER-AP43--- -- f � COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 !'! WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 067693-- - --___..-PAGIFIG-SAFE-TY-E&UIPMEN-T--GO._ _.____..-_-------$1-9498.41------ -5AFETY--5UPPLIES - 067694 PACIFIC BELL $139040 TELEMETERING •; I.. 067695 PARKING FACILITIES EQUIP. CORP $116.72 GATE REPAIRS, PLANT #2 067696 - - - PARKSOK♦ IAC. -- __. . ._.___.. .._...__ ___ __. S49594.04 -- - ENGINE PARTS 067697 PASCAL & LUDWIG 1909000.00 CONTRACTOR P2-26 067698 PEP BOYS $128.02 TRUCK TIRES 067699---- --- - -PERMA-CAL---CORP ORATION------- -- --------- --- 5975.47--- ----ELECTRICAL---SUPPL-IES----- 067700 PERRY EGUIPMENT CORP. $220.52 ENGINE PARTS j Z 0677C1 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $1r135.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES C� 067702 •--- - --•--- RAFFERT-Y-INTERNATIONAL--T-RUCKS---------•-- •-. ----------$498.84---___ .-_-TRUCK PARTS .. 067703 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. OF CALIF. INC. $19387.57 PIPE SUPPLIES II 067704 REXNORC ELECTRCNIC PRODUCTS $19630.90 , ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .� 067765 --•---------ROAGHWA-IER-TECkNCLOGYr-ING.------- ---S4r617.36 ---- BOILER EQUIPMENT3--PLANT--d2---- --- ---- - _. .. .... !�T1 067706 ROBBINS & HEYERS S31.63 FREIGHT 067707 THEODORE ROBINS FORD $35.22 TRUCK PARTS 067708-- --PUSSCO•-CONSTRUCTIONr•--INC-.---•--•-------- - - ----S63r409.49 .­---­CONTRACTOR.- 5-16R .�� C67709 JOSEFH T. RYERSON 6 SON• INC. 119077.09 STEEL STOCK G67710 S.R.F. PACHINERY ENG.r INC. $69700.00 GEAR BOX REPAIRS I" 1 6-67711- -COATING,--TRUCK--BED-LINING 067712 SANC DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $49.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES I.. r-. 067713 SANTA ANA DATSUN $91.35 TRUCK PARTS I-- J67714 -__._._..-- SANTA--ANA DODGE----- ---_ -------.. -- - - -- $107.30- - --TRUCK-- PARTS. ! I ' G67715 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $181.13 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS ('I d G67716 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. S439.38 LAB SUPPLIES f� C67717- ---- - ------SCHOLL--14-00.--AGVERTiSING-- -------- --5137.6b -----UL-T 1 MATE--SOLA OS-D I SPOSAL- PUBL I C -PART-1 C I PAT I ON - „I ._� 06771F CITY OF SEAL BEACH $95.20 WATER USEAGE ;;:o 067719 SIIAMROCK SUPPLY S5r993.09 TOOLS/SMALL HARDWARE I 067720 •- --------SHTMADII; ZfTENTIfIt--INSTR. - - - - - - - - S5r165.00 LAB-SUPPLIES------ I� 067721 SOUTH CCAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT - S491.31 TOFFICE FURNITURE 067722 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. S2379298.85 POWER 067723_ --- SO.- CALIF. SOIL- & -TESTING-------- ----._-------5820.00 --_ TE571NG-P-2--21--- - -------•- ------ ---_ .__ --_.-., 067724 S0. CALIF. WATER CO. $8.49 WATER USEAGE 067725 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $119949.58 DIESEL FUEL j 067726 SPIRAL-BIQDING CO.• INC. ----- .. . _.._.... _ _.._..---- . 8475.39 - - OFFICE-SUPPLIES._._. ._ . .... _..____. I P67727 SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO. $19746.74 SMALL HARDWARE 667728 STAINLESS PIPE & FITTING CO. $164.01 PIPE SUPPLIES 067729 THE-SUPPL-IERS--- ----------- ----------------------419321.88-----••SAFETY-SIGNS 067730 SWEETLAND CO. $131.85 TUBING C67731 TAYLOR BUS SERVICE $220.00 BUS RENTAL - SLUDGE DISPOSAL RFP CONFERENCE n67732 TEKTRONIXr-INC. - - -- $691.72 - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 11 P67733 TENNANT CC. $122.67 ENGINE PARTS 067734 THOMPSOA LACQUER CO. S39425.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 067735 TRAFFIC- CCNTROL SERVICE* INC.-- ---- _-- 5259.20 -_.._ _._ SAFETY SUPPLIES "! 067736 TRANSAMERICA DFLAVAL S5.512.50 ENGINE PARTS 067737 TREESWEET PRODUCTS $189204.46 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 067738 _- TRUCK &-AUTO- SUPPLY• INC.- $29295951 TRUCK PARTS - - •- --- c 1 ; FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 PAGE 5 —RER0114--NUMBER-AP43--- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 067739 --TUBE SALES - — Y280.66- -P I PE--SUPPL-I•ES---- - — - - - -- 067740 UNDERWOOD SERVICES ASSOC. $19040@85 DICTATION EQUIPMENT 067741 UNILOC $240.29 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067742 --- -- UNI-TED-PARCEL--SERVICE ----------------•---- _ - 4109.38-- - -- - DELIVERY. SERVICE ---- DE7743 UNITED STATES F.OUIPMENT CO.• INC. $223.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 067744 UNIVERSITY SALES 8 SERVICE $46.34 TRUCK PARTS 067745--. ------U.S_-POSTAL-SERVJ-CE---- - -------- -440.96- USE-CHARGE-OVERPAYMENT---- t� C67746 VWR SCIENTIFIC $423.83 LAB SUPPLIES m 067747 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2*428.65 PIPE SUPPLIES dOf-774II . . . .. . .._._---VAL-VF-B-ST EEL- SUPPLY.-CO.-___-___.__ ..---•--------•--_-. S667.38---_.._ VALVES..---- -- --- -----. . -------_ _...__. " D nE7745 VAREC• INC. $525.60 LAB REPAIRS C67750 C. K. VARAER CO.. INC. $117.53 BUILDING MATERIALS "`"' GE7751--.---------VE --H4-CLF-SPRING-SER-V-IC6 -- S5.12.40- TRUCK-REPA-I.RS m 067752 WAGNER HYCRAULIC EQUIPMENT CO. $30.23 PIPE SUPPLIES 067753 CARL WARREN 8 CO. S177.24 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR i.. 0677154 -- WAUKESHA-ENGINE-SER-VICENTER.-------•----- --- $49385.16 ------ENGI NE-PARTS coG67755 WCSTERN TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES $29977.00 SCRUBBER REPAIRS 067756 WEYERHAEUSER CO. 159253.84 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 067757 - -- •- - ---G€ORG€--YAR-OL€Y-ASS OGIATES D ----------------- � „I r - - TOTAL•CLAIMS-PAID-02/08/84--- r ----------------- d ; SUMMARY -_ _-------AMOUNT---- 12 OPER FUND $ 142.68 #2 ACD FUND _---•.__-- -232.50 12 F/R FUND 16,400.00 - CA H3 OPER FUND 280.20 "I N3 ACO FUND - - - - - -__------ -- -- ---- ---------948 34- ---- --- -- ------- - H5 OPER FUND 2,432.39 N5 ACO FUND 63,409.49 ' N6 OPER FUND _ __._._ __.. _... -_---.___-._ _.__ ..__ _ _ .. . 20.66 #7 OPER FUND 887.50 #7 ACO FUND 948.34 #7 F/R FUND - ------ _— ------ ----- --------- 650.00-_ ------ ------- #11 OPER FUND 653.74 N5E6 OPER FUND 3,455.31 " N667 OPER FUND . . . .. _ .31027.08 _ JT OPER FUND 441 ,922.86 CORF 302,876.95 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS FUND _. -- - 177.24 - - -_. .....- --- -- -- - - - -- _.. -- - - - -- SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2,244.00 i.. JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 101 ,522.99 "i "I +� TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 $9421232.27 „I 11 to FUND NC 91�`� - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/R4 PAGE 1 - REPORT NUM9.R AP43 ' + COUNTY'SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE.000NTY ,CLAIMS PAI0: 02/22/84 . s WARRANT 140. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCPIPTION ` •` �3. (,7781 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE E475.00 PAVING SERMUS ■ 06'1782 ADVANCED OFFICE SERVICES 5270.6? OFFICE SUPPLIES 1tl +: 067763 ACRCO COMPRESSORS* INC. b1g0.75 COMPRESSOR PARTS _ „1 • 1677A4 nip CALIFORNIA S89.00 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS 4!i677f5 AIk PPOOUCTS 8 CHEMICALS. INC. $97.97 BUILDING MATERIALS : 4b778h AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALS.INC. S1r438.88 SPECIALTY GASES . C� 7E77F7 ALL AMERICAN LEASING $10r639. 6. USED VEHICLES " 'i m 00;77E'B ALL-STATE VEHICLES. INC. $19224.92 VEHICLE .LEASES +j �_ 067789 ALLIED SUPPLY CD. S1r486+26 PIPE SUPPLIES d - .6779' ALUMINUM DRECISION b19497.98 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT �- Itn 1167791 AMERICAN AIR FILTEPr INC. $20.13 FREIGHT ;;•',1 U67792 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 1555.39 ENGINE PARTS to •j ---I C67793 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES 5125.00 TOWEL RENTAL m 967794 AQUA BEN CORP. CHEMICAL COAauLANtt " 3 _ R67795 AQUATIC CENTER 436.00 LAB SUPPLIES + "67795 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC. b1.124.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES " '+ 00 0(7797 ATLAS RADIATOR SERVICE L350.00 TRUCK REPAIRS '+ 6f779H AURORA DESIGI:S $246.27 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT „ ^~r- 067799 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. b1r965.27 PUMP R D 067800 RANK OF• AP.ERICA NT B SA 5651.59 TRAVEL EXPENSES` '+ T- OG7801 OE4CON_ BAY ENTERPRISES, INCi 5165.00•' -` VEHICLE MAINTENANCE- = r nr-7802 PECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $66.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES u 067F03 PEP.TECH $39.5.04 TOOLS ° d �67R^4 UTG DOX RENTAL CO. $665.00 TRASH DISPOSAL ,s Cn C67805 [TOB,rS A R CON011 ONING , i119.00 L,. TRUCK RED-A S " � C67806 CPT' CAL_IFCRNIAr INC. t11332.68 WORD :PROCESSING HAINTENANCS r: .. 1 067807 C.W.P.C.A. E15Or00 �' i `LEGAL ADVERTiSIha. ^• '} ++ " CC-) 016781A CAL-GLASS FOR RESEO.RCHr INC. •$13-1.E2 LAB SUPPLIES u " C67F09 CALIF. ASSOC. OP SAN- AGENCIES 1250.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION Le) 057810 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINE.CP.S $319742.61 ENGR. P2-25-2 PI-20 J-15 ENERGY TASK FORCE 067811 CHRIS CERVEL ONE ' ' $1iO3.5000 NGR, -PW-0 3,, -12 ° 067832 CHEMEX WESTERNS INC. b69.58 TRUCK PART$ 067813 COAST PIPELINE CO. S3.277.13' > CSD N7 REPAIR IL 067P14 COAST SCALE CO. 1172.64 LAB SUPPLIES ' � ^.67815 COn1NE.LL CIJEVROLET S178.10 TRUCK PARTS „ _ 067PIS CONSOLIDATLD ELECTRICAL DIST. b3.,1)3.10 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES '^ OF7.917 CONSOLIDATED Rf.PRODUCT ONS :b1�608:87 BLUEPR T " EPRODUC '16781B CONTACTS'.INFLUENTIAL " b1r044.76 PUBLICATIONS r 067819 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL'CO 5768.50 CHLORINE w ' r;67H2. COPPER ENERGY SERVICES b1U92R2.52 #9 OUTFALL ENGINE REPAIRS 61 967R21 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER s64.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL ,0 067N2? STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1130.00 CSD #7 ANNEXATION FEE (0 19) 067823 OAILY.PILOT' b130.00 LEGAL-ADVEFT-I91NG'' 067824 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE b81389:29 TRUCK TIRES. 067825 OrVALS SALES COMPANY b270:26 PIPE SUPPLIES 067R26 DECKER INSTPUMENT SUPPLY CO. 1319.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ro ly( 1 _ N _ FUM[- NO 714g - ,IT GIST WCPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/R4 FACE T� ArrORT IU H . AP4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i CLAIMS PAID 02/22/84 , I •; WAPFANT Nn. VCNOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ' --E6 c 0 i 5.82ELECTRIM SUPPLIES C67112F DE1i-FAR SALES 8 SERVICE $211.63 MANHOLE COVER " m S67V2S DICKSONS $66.78 TRUCK PARTS 7l.7+';.c OFIVCP TESTING CENTER $20.00 DRIVER EXAMS " C(,71121 E-7 LAMINATING CO. 1705.80 PAGER SUPPLIES P67R3? EASTMAN, INC. 1616.2P• OFFICE SUPPLIES ,F.7113? EBERHARO LOUIPMUNT t191.4? TRUCK PARTS 4-1 m C67f'.4 FAFIILIAN PIPE 8 SUPPLY $19297.67 PIPE SUPPLIES 3 C(.7P.i . PICNAEL J. FILFCCIA. t14.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ilf 7f'3f FILTER SUFPLY CO. $19231.86 ENG N�PARTS 067P37 FIgST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $49.00 CSO #2 RECONVEYANCE RECORDING .00 11671+3" FISCHE:R ; PORTER CO. $39424.49 PIPE SUPPLIES „ I 16�PiO C F FORD A. FORKERT LNG k ' P2-27 1)67640 VAL FOTH 8 SONS 139ih18:94 CONTRACTOR PW-109 C67P41 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $14.57 FILM PROCESSING r "67A4; PONALD L. FOX t ASSOCIAlE3 46110.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT r "67f4? FRUIT GROWEIIS LABOR4TOPY9 INC,. x?6.0i LAB ANALYSIS d r67F44 FPYEFS AUTO SFAS $7.15 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT n .--. CITY OF 128.0C/l P745 4 T 067E46 GW MAINTENANCEi INC. S552:76" ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ;X3 067P47 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. i6*620416 TELEPHONE u ---'6-7F4' i FIASCO OIL CO.9 INC. t174.45 ENGINE OIL 967A4' �.6. HELLER"S SON• INC. b40.99 TOOLS n (/) R(7f'5P 14f-'PTZ CAR LEASING $327.54 VEHICLE LEASE 667651 POLCHEP4 INC. 2+015.55 C US D C67F52 HORIZON HIGH-REACH $94.71 VEHICLE PARTS P(•7f'5i _ THE HOSE MAN $203.52 _ HOSE C17Itb4--- CITY OF HUNTINGTON' (EACH 17.31 WATER USEAGE " P671:55 F4UNTTNGTON PEACH RUBBER STAMP $49.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES ('f.7(5F. 1411NT INGTOK SUPPLY t64.40 SMALL HARDWARE 0 6 7 A 5 7 HURLEY E ECT ONICSoINC; t50.88 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 9678511 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL CO. 11+759.68 FERRIC CHLORIDE 067859 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $289.91 SMALL HARDWARE +I ` n(•7r6_' IVGERSCLL-RAND CO. 1645.54 ENGINE PARTS PF7861 INTCROX AFERICA i12.272.16 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 11C71462 IRVINE INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPE 3-64P.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE + C67P.63 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.97 FT-E--R---U SEAGIf- 067P64 JERKY#S BACKHOE R CONST+ CO• 1429.00 5-19 KEPAIRS „J 067P65 HA: SAFETY PRODUCTS _ _S198.60 _ SAFETY _SUPPLIES_ 7(766C KING, FEARING. INC. s10fa96.75 BEARING SUPPLIES C7: C67R67 L & N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO 13.672.54 UNIFORM RENTAL , J R67A6A L.P.I;.S., INC. S755.87 WELDING SUPPLIES 067869 LAUPSEN COLOR LAB $2 .44 FILM PROCESSING 067870 LEFFINGWELL $569.91 USE CHARGE OVERPAYHEki 067871 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS INC. i1h8.37 _ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �67E72 C11v OF LOS ALAMITO!z w - Torn.-C�' CSDOC 13 MANHOLE REPAIRS �I t7d t W fUND IJO "199 - JT (`1ST WORKING CAPITAL _ -� PPOCES9ING I.IATF 2/1C/F•4 FAGE REPORT NUMDE.P, AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' ---- _ ----- -- ------ CLAIMS_PAID 02/22/A4 + WARRANT NO. VLNDOR AMOUNT DESCRIFTION F; 067873 LOS ANGELES TIMES S13.45 LEGAL ADVERTISING. ' + 067874 MARDEN SUSCO S580.88 PIPE SUPPLIES rol 067875 _ MARVAC ELECTRONICS _ _$35.04_-,_` ELECTR-ICAL-SUP_P_LIES ---- - ---- ------ -.. . .. Ito' 067P76 MATT - CHLOR. INC. - R262.77 PIPE SUPPLIES � 067P77 MCCAIN INSTRUMENTS $%3.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES „ _ 1-67P7P MCCRAW-HILL PUBLICATIONS CO. $154.05 LEGAL ADVERTISING It OE,7079 MC14ASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $91,27 PIPE SUPPLIES 067E80 MEASUREOUIPMENT• INC. S4#460.04 , ALIGNMENT. COMPUTER .� 067SPI MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. ' 8398.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES A67►:'N? NISCO 1229548.11 MUFFIN MONSTER PARTS I11 C67bS'I MONTGOMERV ELEVATOR COMPANY %298.48 PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE , C-67FP4 MORGAN CRANC CO.• INC. $29021.35 CRANE PARTS " C67885 NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY $626.59 SMALL- HARDWARE, . r ^67886 NEWARK ELECTRONICS .%54433• -ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067867 OLYMPICICHE141CAL CO, 5.2Z ="CHLORINES- C67FBF ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $114.91 PIPE SUPPLIES " n (• 0670P9 C'WL CRANE 8 RIGGING $3.905.45 CRANE RENTAL „ F�671190 09YEEN SERVICE $33.00 DEMURRAGE u - 067891 OZALID CORP. $195.75•:. BLUEPRINT MACHINE " 067892 COUNTY ,SANITATION. DISTRICT It3.945.1B..`,. REPLENISH WORKERS'•COMP, FUND ' ... �.. 067.893__ PPG• INDUSTR1Est INC. j_ S2581,43 _' 4AINT.'SUPPLLES --- --------_ -_._ u A67P94 PACIFIC MCBILE OFFICES 1.150.52 PLANT N2 TRAILER RENTAL If nF7R95 PACO $66.81 PUMP PARTS „ P67896 _PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $28.58 SAFETY SUPPLIES w C67A97 PACIFIC BELL $10.43 TELEMETER NG . 4vf 11 067898 PARTS UNLIMITED 519964:.82 "TRUf;IC: PARTS u _-067855 M.C. PA` TEN CORPz �� 7fl STRIP CHARTS,! ------- ,+ .+ 1lE74C7 - PEPMA-CAL CORPORATION 129385.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067QA1 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $126.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES +, G679C-2 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $268.95 LAB SUPPLIES " „ C67903 POLY FABRICS S171•.40 PIPE S PPLIES ( U679P4 POSTMASTER $75.35' USE CHARGE OVEkOAYMENT +, _ 0679G5 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $30090 "_"_LNDUST •A,L WA51E SAhPING ICE +" - C.F7996 QUALIFIED ELECTRIC SUPPLY $444.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _ S' " 0(7907 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS $19.28 TRUCK PARTS 067901s kAIN[:OW OISFOSAL CO. $334.00 TRA_SIH DISPOSAL 067909 THE, REGISTER53,109.94 CLASSIFIED AOVER1f5 N(i ; " 067910 THE- REGISTER 1:51o1961,58 LEGAL ADVERTISING..,a � '+ 067911 ROACHWATER TECHNOLOGY' INC. $200.38 FREIGHT 10 P67912 P013DINS ,R MEYERS $781.73 PUMP PARTS r " 067913 JOf•EPN T. RYERSON It SON* INC. $368.59 STEEL STOCK + ,- 967914 SANTA ANA DODGE $418.28 TRUCK 067915 SANTANA.•CLECTRIC f10TORS %439.56 - ELECTRIC 'MOTOR REPAIRS A " 067916 SARGENT WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. s3101.40 LAB .SUPPLIES u 067917 SCILINE PRODUCTS .0 5.84 LAp SUppLIES y 467916 SCACLIFF ESTATES $81.261.30 INTEREST PAYMENT. COAST 'TRUNK SEWER-CSD #1111 c ' bd - ' FUNU NO Sl'?9 - JT DI ST WORMING C•IPITAL PROCESSING GATE 2/16/84 PACE h -- REPORT .NUMBER AP43 '. COUNTY SANITATIONDISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/2VR4. I + WARPAMT VO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION r I, 067919 SEALMETHODS* INC. $702.14 ENG NE OIL r 067920 SHALLER 9 LOHRq INC. :3842.00 ': ENGR. 5-18R 067921 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $39142:05 TOOLS/SAFETY EQUIPMENT ' �lo �57922 SH['PHARD MACHINERY CO• $9,993.67 LOADER REPAIRS • , 067923 CHARLES SMITH CO.. INC. $T9.72. TRUCK PARTS C67Q24 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $1049737.4R POWER rc C6T925 SO, CAL* GAS C04 $109178:93 NATURAL GAS " U67926 SPARKLFTTS DRINKING WATER-. $996.75 BOTTLED WATER P `�679?7 _ TIDE SUPPLIERS 13Q.35_...� "TOOLS/SEALS �_' . _ m (1[?792P J. YAYNE SYLVESTEF $19471.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT (167929 F.M. THOMAS AIR CO!•NOITION1NG $361.00 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 0G7c3? THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $66.65 PAINT SUPPLIES 1. OF 931 R V U S E341.00 AIR FARES VARIOUS M ETI GS 01~7932 H. 0. tRERICE. S699:4B "ELECTRICAL SUPPLIESit Fr t67733 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $527.77 TRUCK PARTS -- tl67934 U.S. AUTO CLASS* INC. %325.40 TRUCK REPAIRS n C.7935 U.S.O. CORP. $36.70 LAB REPAIRS �•, _ — (167936 UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. 464.54 GASOLINE ' QE15;7UNITED PARCEI 545.58 D L VE Y SERV 0675?0 VUR SCIENTIFIC Sli875*01 .LAB SUPPLIES :r CE7939 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,447.92 PIPE SUPPLIESIt .I 0(7`14C VAUGHAN'S INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO $360.50 ENGINE REPAIRS _ [+E•7�4] JOHN R• WAPLES $377.80 ODOR CONSULTANT ° ') _ r167942 VAUKESHA ENGINE. SERVICENTER. $34.87 ENGINE PARTS J1 m . -- OE7943 . WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP--, s363.0 ELECTRICAL SUPP K 067944 B D. WHETSTONE & `ASSOCIATES `. 51.076.00 ;COMPUTER PROcRAHH�MG _ 067945 ROURKE R WOODRUFF, INC. $16*043.70 LEGAL .SERVICES 11 06790, YEROX CORP. $49183.33 XEROX REPRODUCTION -- 's C67917 Y - TIRE S1,746.88 TRUCK TIRES " P679118 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES 1243.38 VALVES --06—T-94W 7IN CLASS, F OTEC 49: 0 _ s _.--_-- PA NT SUPPLIES .., , r �t ) 1+-- TOTAL CLAIMS GA10 02/22/84 $5209362.45 + „ s. 41 , is f FUND NO 9199_ - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL _ Y PROCESSING DATE 2/�84 —PAGE -__5 -_ ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORNAGE COUNTY ' -- --- --•---.� —�6ALa.5_�Al.P__Q2L2�L8-�— ----------'---------------------__ . . .. 5.S[lt11ARY. 1!l1Q_UNT w n u 10 Ill OPER FUND +— 2,438.41 11 ' #3 OPER FUND 9,614.82 _- 13 AfQ-FUND #5 OPER FUND 3,880.55 if #5 ACO FUND 846.96 N7 OPER FUND 8.358.96 N7 ACO FUND 26.27 ) LLL-Q P E B_F-IN D -8.6.,_Z-15 19 113 ACO FUND 34.50 n Ti #5a6 OPER FUND 978,46 J T OP.A FII N D +/ CORF 94,811 .65 " 11 ! SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 387.50 .1 } El EUN.DED WORKERS' COMP- INSURANCE FUND 4a945.1 4 ^I JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 64,197.16 " " —.`TOTAL-CCA'1RS—PlrrD—O27f227 L if 10 .. it i/ 48 1 to ,t it 5J it si is At 11 J 11 1 ;It R� RESOLUTION NO. 84-23 AWARDING JOBS NOS. I-2R-2 AND I-2R-3 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REHABILITATION OF BUSHARD TRUNK, PHASE II, ADAMS AVENUE TO HAMILTON AVENUE, JOB NO. I-2R-2, AND PHASE III, HAMILTON AVENUE TO "C" HEADWORKS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. I-2R-3 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Sancon Engineering, Inc. for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, Job No. I-2R-2, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. I-2R-3, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, Job No. I-2R-2, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. I-2R-3, be awarded to Sancon Engineering, Inc. in the total amount of $842,496.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" NO ADDENDUM February 28, 1984 11:00A.M. B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T JOB NO. I-2R-2 & 3 PROJECT TITLE REHABILITATION OF BUSHARD TRUNK, PHASE II, ADAM.S AVENUE TO HAMILTON AVENUE, JOB NO. I-2R-2 AND PHASE III, HAMILTON AVENUE TO "C" HEADWORKS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. I-2R-3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, supplies and services necessary for the slip-lining of the Bushard Trunk. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 1,300,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 1,600,000 REMARKS CONTRACTOR SUBTOTAL ADD/DEDUCT TOTAL BID 1. Sancon Engineering, Inc. Fountain Valley, CA $ 842,496 0.00 $ 842,496.00 2. Murphy Industrial Coatings, Inc. Signal Hill, CA $1,197,794.64 0.00 $ 1,197,794.64* 3. Vido Samarzich, Inc. Arcadia, CA $1,243.902 0.00 $ 1,243,902.00 4. Thibodo Construction Company, Inc. Vista, CA $1,984,232 0.00 $ 1,984,232.00* * Corrected Total I have reviewed the proposal submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Sancon Engineering, Inc. of Fountain Valley, California, in the bid amount of $842,496.00 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" r RESOLUTION NO. 84-24 AWARDING JOB NO. PtR 097 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT TO REFURBISH EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOXES AT PLANT 110. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-097 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Advanco Constructors, Inc. to Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-097, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract 'to Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-097 be awarded to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $106,600.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "D" AGENDA ITEM #E9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D" NO ADDENDUM February 28, 1984 11:00A.M. B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T JOB NO. PW-097 PROJECT TITLE REFURBISH EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOXES AT PLANT NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnish all labor, material, and equipment for rehabilitat- ing Districts metering and junction boxes located at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 110,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 120,600 REMARKS CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Advanco Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $ 106,600.00 2. F.T. Ziebarth Company Fullerton, CA $ 110,800.00 3. CK Pump & Dewatering Corp. Long Beach, CA $ 131,659.85 4. Sancon Engineering Inc. Fountain Valley, CA $ 136,600.00 5. Kershaw Construction Company Ontario, CA $ 159,890.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco Constructors, Inc. of Upland, California, in the bid amount of $106,600.00 as the lowest and best bid. 1 9 G-1 �01 Ca4-00 Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer "E" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E" r RESOLUTION NO. 84-25 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-112 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR OFFICE PARTITIONS AND LAVATORY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-112 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-112, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-112 be awarded to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the total amount of $19,969.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "F" AGENDA ITEM #9(D) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F" 1 ADDENDUM February 28, 1994 11:00A.M. B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T JOB NO. PW-112 PROJECT TITLE OFFICE PARTITIONS AND LAVATORY AT PLANT NO. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnish all equi=nent, labor and materials and install a wood frame lavatory inside the Warehouse and two offices inside the Operations Center at Plant No. 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 28,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 33,000 (Lavatory: $15,000 Offices: $18,000) CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor Dana Point, CA $ 19,969.00 2. Steeber Construction, Inc. La Habra, CA $ 21,170.00 3. Allen I. Messing Fountain Valley, CA $ 22,300.00 4. RG Construction Costa Mesa, CA $ 25,586.00 5. Means and Ulrich Santa Ana, CA $ 25,697.00 6. Leo Chavez, General Contractor Santa Ana, CA $ 25,915.85 7. Spec Builders Laguna Hills, CA $ 30,000.00 8. Trinity Construction Company Torrance, CA $ 30,834.00 9. D.D. Bennett Construction Company Torrance, CA $ 42,994.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, of Dana PointWCali ornia, in the bid amount of $19,969.00 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer "G" AGENDA ITEM #9(D) (2) "G" RESOLUTION NO. 84-26 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS �d FOR JOB NO. PW-116 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR UPS (UNINTERRUPTED POWER SOURCE) SYSTEM FOR PLANT NO. 2 COMPUTER SYSTEM RPU'S (REMOTE PROCESSING UNIT) , JOB NO. PW-116 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. .2 Computer System RPU's (Remote Processing Unit) , Job No. PW-116. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That the project for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. 2 Computer System RPU's (Remote Processing Unit) , Job No. PW-116, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. 2 Computer System RPU's (Remote Processing Unit) , Job No. PW-116, are hereby approved and adopted; and, "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS 9-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-27 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. PW-122 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR COOLING WATER REUSE AT FOSTER PUMP STATION, JOB NO. PW-122 WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122. NOW, THEREFOR:, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby �..✓ determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That the project for Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for construction of Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #F9(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #°(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-28 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. J-11R A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT CHILLER PACKAGE FOR LABORATORY AIR CONDITIONER, JOB NO. J-11R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner, Job No. J-11R. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California,Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have �..•' concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That the project for construction of Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner, Job No. J-11R, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by, Districts' engineers, for Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner, Job No. J-11R, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" for said wort pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. 11J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) - ALL DISTRICTS 11J-2" X 3127 - ? C3'44 "vl. .iv VA EY, CALIrCRNIA 92i'38 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO-. C - 06- 1073-150 C . O . NO. One (1) _ CONTRACTOR : Advanco Constructors Inc. DATE March 5, 1984 J Oi3 : ,HYDPAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25-2 Arrnount of this Change Order (DEDUCT) $ 5,654.00 In accordance with contract provisions , the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The District accepts the Contractor's proposal dated .February 17 , 1984 in the amount of a credit of $5,654 substituting co-plastic slide gates with 316 stainless steel frames for the heavy duty cast iron sluice gates specified in Standard Specification Section 41 . - TOTAL AMOUNT OF CREDIT: PCH252-2 ($5,654.00) The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It. is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 12, 1983 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 3, 1985 Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time _600 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date May 3, 1985 Original Contract Price $ 3,210,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 Th i s Change (AY11) (DEDUCT) $ (5 ,654.00) Amended Contract Price S 3,204,346.00 Board authorization date:. March 14, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California ' B Y By - --------- Contractor Chief EnginFer "K" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) - ALL DISTRICTS "K" TY I rr i ION DISTRI CT OF CO UN T. Y P . 0. BOX 8127 - 10E4% Et LIS ..VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . N//A ---- ---- - C . O . N 0. Two (2).-- - — -----�-- CONTRACTOR :. Advanco Constructors Inc. _ DATE February 2, 1984 JOB : FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS FOR INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB ^10. P2-27 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) 50,242.00 In accordance with contract provisions , the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1 . The Contractor is directed to install substitute pH metering system in accordance with Districts letter dated May 10, 1983 , Contractor 's proposal dated May 26, 1983 , and Section 10-4 of-the General Provisions , Extra Work, for the lump sum amount of S 1 ,784.00 2. The -Contractor is directed to modify the masonry enclosure walls on the north and east side of the foul air scrubber site in accordance with Districts letter dated June 1 , 1983 , Contractor' s proposal dated June 23 , 1983 and Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, Extra Work, for the lump sum amount of y 640.00 3 . The Contractor is directed to encase the drain from the scrubber building to the manhole in accordance with Contractor' s proposal dated June 21 , 1933 , and Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, Extra Work, for the lump sum amount of . . . $ 1 ,856.00 4. Excavation for the work revealed asphalt not shown on the plans and buried under dirt. The Contractor was required to remove the asphalt and haul it to the dump incurring removal , hauling and tipping fee charges. All charges, are in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions , Extra Work, and Contractor' s approved daily time sheets as submitted by letter dated June 23 , 1983 for the lump sum amount of . . . $14,325.00 5. The Contractor is directed to remove the existing conduit and pipe trench. Contractor is required to remove all concrete and haul it to the dump incurring removal , hauling and dump fees. Contractor is also directed to haul adequate fill material from Districts tsurplus earth piles. All charges are in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions , Extra I•iork, and Contractor' s approved daily time sheets for the lump sum amount of . . . $ 7 ,284.00 "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" C;-UNTY S.:NI TATION DISTRICTS OF :RANGE COUNTY Page 2- P . 0 . BOX 8127 — 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . N/A C. O . NO . Two (2) CONTRACTOR : Advanco Constructors Inc. DATE February 2, .1984 JOB : FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS FOR INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO; P2-27 6. The grading and paving plan for the scrubber area was revised to provide for improved drainage and to minimize the severity of the paving profile. As a result, the Contractor was required to provide additional fill over the majority of the area to be paved to meet the new paving grades. Lump Sum Amount . . . $ 6,364.00 7 . The two (2) 6" PVC cleanouts for the scrubber facility drain system were not suitable for setting in roadway paving. The Districts provided the Contractor with two concrete vaults for the Contractor to Set prior to paving. Lump Sum Amount . . . $ 554.00 8. In order to eliminate fouling of the pneumatic controls in the scrubber chemical feed system, the Contractor was instructed to install an instrument air dryer in the motor control center building. Lump Sum Amount . . . $ 1 ,473.00 \,,,, 9. The original paving plan .instructed the Contractor to pave over existing paving at Sedimentation Basin "J" . The existing paving interfered with the placement of new base and paving as revised, and had to be removed. Lump Sum Amount' . $ 1 ,564.00 10. The Districts instructed the Contractor to increase - the limits of the underground foul air line encasement beyond that originally- required in the Plans. . Lump Sum Amount . . . $11 ,160.00 11 . The limits of new paving were increased due' to the revision of the overall grading and paving plan. The Contractor was required' to provide additional base and paving in some areas and provide additional paving overlay in others. Lump Sum Amount $ 3,238.00 12. Delay due to subcontractor's inability to supply polyethylene pipe and fittings. Time extension only. $ 0.00 13. Rain and evacuation due to excessive fumes. Time extension only. L $ 0.00 TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $50,242.00 "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( I) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY �'ige 3' ' ` P . O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C . O . N0. Two (2) CONTRACTOR : Advanco Constructors Inc. DATE February 2; 1984 JOB :—FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS FOR INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-27 The time extension required to perform the work in this change order is as follows: Item #1 Days Allowed 0 Calendar Days Item #2 Days Allowed 0 Calendar Days Item #3 Drain Encasement 5 Calendar Days Item #4 Asphalt Removal 32 Calendar Days Item #5 Pipe Trench Removal 8 Calendar Days Item 1#6 Revising Grading and Paving 12 Calendar Days Item #7 Install Vaults at Cleanouts 3 Calendar Days Item #8 Install Instrument Air' Dryer 0 Calendar Days Item #9 Paving Modifications 0 Calendar Days Item 1#10 Added Encasement 26 Calendar Days Item #11 Added Base and Paving 0 Calendar Days Item r12 Polyethylene Pipe and Fitting Delay 63 .Calendar Days �d Item #13 Rain and Evacuation due to Excessive Fumes , as listed 71 Calendar Days Date of Storm Days 1/24 - 2/7 15 2/18 1 2/28 - 3/6 7 3/18 - 3/23 6 4/18 - 4/24 7 4/29 - 5/1 3 9/20 - 9/22 3 9/28 - 10/2 5 10/31 - 11/3 4 11/17 - 11/20 4 12/3 - 12/6 "4 12/9 - 12/13 5 12/27 - 12/29 3 1/16/84 - 1/18 3 9/2 - Contractor stopped due to chlorine problems - Evacuation 1 71 Days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE. ORDER: 220 Calendar Days "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #,9( 1) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3" COUNTY S -,N I TATI ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 P . G . BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . N/A \..,/ C . O . NO . Two (2) CONTRACTOR : Advanco Constructors Inc. DATE February 2, 1984 JOB : FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS FOR INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. 'P2-27 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract . plus the 220 calendar days time extension granted hereby. It is , therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 220 calendar days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been, or will be, incurred by Contractor. Equipment Procurement: 63 Calendar Days Inclement Weather: 71 Calendar Days Work Changes: 86 Calendar Days 220 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 29, 1982 Original Contract Time 150 Calendar Days - Original Completion Date May 27 , 1983 Time Extension This Change Order 220 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 230 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 380 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date January 12, 1984 Original Contract Price $ 710,436.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 2,105.00 Th i s Change (ADD) (o>iFxivo $ 50,242.00 Amended Contract Price $ 762,783.00 Board authorization date: March 14, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By Deputy Chief Engineer Ay Contractor "L-4" AGENDA ITEM #9 0 ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P . 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 i CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.. N/A j C .O. NO. ' Three (3) CONTRACTOR : Advanco Constructors Inc. DATE February 2, 1984 I JOB: FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS FOR INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-27 i Amount of this Change Order (DEDUCT) $ 10,500.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The original time allowed for the completion of the project was 150 calendar days, having a completion date of May 27, 1983. During the course of the project the Contractor performed additional work at the request of the Districts- and was delayed by unusually inclement weather and by delays beyond his control- in the procurement of specified materials. The Contractor was granted an additional 230 calendar days of non-compensable time changing the time for completion to 380 calendar days, and having a new completion date of January 12, 1984. The Contractor completed the project in 401 calendar days , on February 2, 1984, 21 calendar days in excess of the time allowed as revised in Change Order No. 2. In accord with the terms set forth in Section 6 of the Contract, the Contractor is assessed Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars per day for the 21 additional calendar days used by him to complete the project. Credit for Liquidated Damages . . . $10,500.00 Original Contract Price $ 710,436.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 52,347.00 This Change VAM (DEDUCT) $ 10,500.00 Amended Contract Price $ 752,283.00 Board authorization date: March 14, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By By Contractor Deputy Chief Engineer limit AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (2) = ALL DISTRICTS "M" RESOLUTION NO. 84-29 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-27 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS FOR INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-27, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, the contractor, Advanco Constructors, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, on February 2, 1984, and Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended `.d acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 29, 1982, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, and assessing the contractor for liquidated damages for 21 days from January 12, 1984, the contractual completion `mod "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9 0) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" date, to February 2, 1984, the actual date of completion of work by the contractor, in the amount of $500.00 per day, for the total amount of $10,500.00, as provided in the plans and specifications for said contract, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. `ad "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 0 ) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" COUNTY SAKI T.,. : 0`. = 1 S 7 ; I CTS OE ORANGE COUNTY P . 0. 3� : 3844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNIAIN VALLEY , CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . N/A l`� C .O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR_ Dorado Enterprises; Inc. DATE February 2, 1984 JOB : SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION AT HEADWORKS "C" , TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-110 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1 . Contractor is requested to remove 60 feet of 2-1/2-inch steam line in Lewis Tunnel . ADDED COST: $0.00 2. Contractor is requested to correct angle detail of pipe at intersection and excavate additional earth as required. ADDED COST: $0.00 3. Contractor is requested to replace 900 elbow with 450 elbows at intersection of Lewis and Lindstrom Tunnels. ADDED COST: $0.00 4 Contractor is requested to install 450 elbows in lieu of 900 `�►' elbow as indicated at the Lindstrom and Grit Chamber Tunnels. ADDED COST: $0.00 5 . Contractor is requested to install two 450 elbows in lieu of 900 elbow as indicated at the intersection of Rollins and Lewis Tunnels. ADDED COST: $0.00 6. Contractor is requested to relocate pipeline to west side of Grit Chamber Tunnel to avoid conflict with pipe to be installed on future contract. ADDED COST: $0.00 7. Contractor is requested to replace or modify certain existing pipe supports in Lewis Tunnel . ADDED COST: $0.00 8. Contractor is requested to delete one 10-inch expansion joint as required on the plans. ADDED COST: $0.00 9. Contractor is requested to install' three four-inch flex hoses supplied by the Districts in lieu of 5'-0" of four-inch PVC pipe. �..✓ ADDED COST: $0.00 "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. P . 0. BOX 8127 — 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C .O. NO. One (1 ) CONTRACTOR : Dorado Enterprises Inc. DATE February 2, 1984 JOB : SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION.AT HEADWORKS licit , TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-110 The additional work in this change order cannot be performed incidental to the prime work within the time frame of the original contract. It is , therefore, mutually agreed that a time extension is required for this change order and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by the Contractor. Days allowed and reasons are as listed: Item Days Allowed 1 2 Calendar Days 2 1 Calendar Day 3 1 Calendar Day 4 1 Calendar Day 5 1 Calendar Day 6 3 Calendar Days 7 3 Calendar Days 8 0 Calendar Days 9 0 Calendar Days Inclement weather and date of storm, days allowed: 10/31 - 11/3 4 Calendar Days 11/17 - 11/20 4 Calendar'Days 12/3 - 12/6 4 Calendar Days 12/9 - 12/13 5 Calendar Days 12/27 - 12/29 3 Calendar Days 1/16/84 - 1/18 3 Calendar Days 23 Calendar Days Contractor is also allowed a total of six (6) calendar days due to District- incurred stoppage caused by Districts forces working on critical equipment in Contractor's work area. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 41 Calendar Days "C�-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P . O . BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C .O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR : Dorado Enterprises Inc. DATE February 2, 1984 JOB : SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION AT HEADWORKS "C" , TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, PW-110 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Date October 24, 1983 Original Contract Time 60 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 22, 1983 Time Extension this Change Order 41 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 101 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date February 1, 1984 Original Contract Price $ 58,179.00 - Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 58,179.00 Board authorization date: March 14, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By Deputy Chief Engineer By �✓ Contractor "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3" RESOLUTION NO. 84-30 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-110 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION AT HEADWORKS "C", TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-110, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Dorado Enterprises, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110 on February 1, 1984, and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated October 24, 1983, and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Dorado Enterprises, Inc.,, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "P" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "P" °� TELEPHONES: COUNTY- SANITATION DISTRICTS o AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41101 P. 0. BOX S127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 927013 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 29, 1984 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue F^untain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Preparation of Environmental Impact Report for Joint Works Master Plan Facilities In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, and as authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors pursuant to minute order of July 13, 1984 the Selection Committee has reviewed and approved the proposal of K. P. Lindstrom & Associates for services in connection with the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for Joint Works Master Plan Facilities. The fee for this work will be as follows: Professional Services for preparation of environmental document, not to exceed $28,665 Direct Costs including travel , communications, supplies, copying, drafting materials, photographs, etc. 4,000 Direct Costs for Typing 1,500 TOTAL CONTRACT NOT TO EXCEED $34,165 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/ Donald A. Holt, Jr. /s/ Richard Edgar Dona d A. Holt, Jr. , Chairman Richard Edgar, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee �.d /s/ J. Wayne Sylvester J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager Selection Committee "QII AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 84-31 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM AND �+.✓ ASSOCIATES RE PREPARATION OF EIR ON UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR JOINT WORKS FACILITIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM AND ASSOCIATES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES RE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE JOINT WORKS FACILITIES WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures and previous authorization by the Boards of Directors, an agreement has been negotiated with K. P. Lindstrom and Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan of Joint Works Facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and K. P. Lindstrom and Associates for consulting services in connection with preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan for the Joint Works Facilities, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: "R-1" AGENDA ITEM ##9(a) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" Professional services for preparation of environmental document, not to exceed $28,665.00 Direct costs including travel, communications, supplies, copying, drafting materials, photographs, etc. 4,000.00 Direct costs for typing 1,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $34,165.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-211 . RESOLUTION NO. 84-35 AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE INTERIM SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENTS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS/DEVELOPERS RE PROPERTY OUTSIDE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL BE SERVED BY DISTRICT 2, DISTRICT 7 OR PROPOSED DISTRICT 13 A RESOLUTION OF BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE INTERIM SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENTS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS/DEVELOPERS RE PROPERTY OUTSIDE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL BE SERVED BY DISTRICT 2, DISTRICT 7 OR PROPOSED DISTRICT 13 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 have heretofore approved a negotiated AB 8 tax exchange settlement with the County of Orange for new service area annexations; and, WHEREAS, said agreement provided, in part, for the formation of new County Sanitation District No. 13 to serve approximately 24,000 acres outside the present Districts' boundaries but tributary to District No. 2 and District No. 7; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said settlement, said Boards of Directors have authorized Districts 2 and 7 to enter into interim service agreements to provide temporary sewer service to territory outside the present Districts' boundaries, pending formation of District No. 13; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have previously approved terms to be included in said interim service agreements; and, WHEREAS, the General Counsel has prepared a standard form for said interim sewer service agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICTS 2 & 7 "T-1" execute interim sewer service agreements, on behalf of the Boards of Directors of lvr � Districts Nos. 2, 7 and proposed District No. 13, in form approved by the General Counsel, for developments outside present Districts' boundaries, incorporating the terms set forth for said agreements by the Joint Boards of Directors by minute order of July 14, 1982. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICTS 2 & 7 7-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-36-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 3-24-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR KATELLA INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-24-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Lowry & Associates, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Ratella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the District has concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determines that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That the project for construction of Ratella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, for construction of Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the District's Deputy Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. /lull AGENDA ITEM #9(T) - DISTRICT 3 "U" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE, COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 3 �..✓ CONTRACTOR: Russco Construction, Inc. DATE February 29, 1984 REHABILITATION AND RELOCATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER FROM BAY JOB: BRIDGE PUMP STATION TO DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-18R (REBID) Amount of this Change Order (Add) -(Bedtiey- $ 4,191.28 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. The Contractor is directed to relocate the underground Edison power feeders to clear District's valve vault and highway improvements constructed by the City of Newport Beach, in accordance with Section 10-4 (Extra Work) of the General Provisions and District, City, and Edison requirements, for the lump sum amount. . . . $ 4,191.28 TOTAL ADD: $ 4,191.28 2. The Contractor is granted a time extension of 28 calendar days for the extra work. The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the previously approved time extensions and 4 additional days granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 28 days total ap- proved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, inci- dental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION: 28 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME �_�_=_______=_ Original Contract Date May 9, 1983 Original Contract Time 210 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 4, 1983 Time Extension this C.O. 28 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 80 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 290 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date February 22, 1984 Original Contract Price $ 836,585.40 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 12,978.45 This Change (Add) f9edtiet) $ 4,191.28 Amended Contract Price $ 853,755.13 Board authorization date: March 14, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ! 0 UNTY, IFORNIA 3v �yv� ,�f i'� '� f, 2/29 84 3 4 a �yir, RUSSCO"CONSTRUC''I01T •NC/Contractor r 15epuzy Cries Engineer "V" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) - DISTRICT 5 "V" COUNTY SANITATION .DISTRICT! of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. 60X 8727 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 INITIAL STUDY (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) I. Background A. Name of Proponent COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ;#7 of ORANGE COUNTY B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 714/540-2910 C. Contact Person Hilary J. Baker, Senior Engineering Aide D. Title and Location of Project Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main. In Michelson Drive between Von Karman terminating just east of Jamboree Boulevard at the Michelson Drive Pump Station E. . Description of Project Installation of a 21" gravity relief trunk and a 10" force main to provide adequate relief to the existing gravity sewer and force main. Project is necessary due to intense development planned for areas east of Von Karman and south of Michelson. "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-1" II. Guidelines A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28. Yes X No ( If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form. ) B. Does the project qualify as: 1. Ministerial (Section 6) Yes No X 2. Emergency (Section 13) Yes No X 3. A feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes No X 4. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 40) Yes No X 5. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 36) Yes No X If yes, identify lead agency: (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. ) III. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No A. Earth. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X 2. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ? X 3. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X 4. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X -2- "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-2" Yes Maybe No 6. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in silation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X 7. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazard? X B. Air. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Substantial air emissions or deteriora- tion of ambient air quality? X 2. The creation of objectionable odors? X 3. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature or any change -in climate, either locally or regionally? X C. Water. Will the proposal result in:' 1 . Changes in currents or the course of direction of water movements in either marine or fresh water? X 2. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X 3. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X 4. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X 5. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X 6. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters.? X 7. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X -3- "W-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-3" Yes Maybe No 8. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 9. Exposure of people or property to related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? x D. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? X 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 3. Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X 4. Reduction in acreage of any agriculture crop? X E. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects? x 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X 3. Introduction of new species of animals into an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X 4. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X F. Noise. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Increase in existing noise levels? X 2. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X G. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X -4- "W-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-4" Yes Maybe No H. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X I. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X 2. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? X J. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: 1 . A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 2. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X K. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? X L. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X M. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X 2. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? X 3. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? X 4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 5. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X -5- "W-5" AGENDA ITEM #9 0) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-5" Yes Maybe No 6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X N. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1 . Fire protection? X 2. Police protection? X 3. Schools? X 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? X 5. Maintenance of public facilities, in- cluding roads? X 6. Other governmental services? X 0. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X 2. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? X P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities? 1 . Power or natural gas? X 2. Communications systems? X 3. Water? X 4. Sewer or septic tanks? X 5. Storm water drainage? X 6. Solids waste and disposal ? X Q. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x -6- "W-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-6" Yes Maybe No 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X R. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X S. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X T. Cultural Resources. 1 . Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? X 3. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X 4. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X U. Mandatory Findings of Significance. 1 . Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal , or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X -7- "W-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "W-7" Yes Maybe No 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- y+' term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, de- finitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) x 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulative con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) x 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet. V. ' Discussion of Zoning Compatibility See attached sheet. VI. Determination (To be completed by Lead Agency. ) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added xxx to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: March 7 , 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF IN.d ORANGE COUNTY "W-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1FL0TS-'Ir4wTs , 6D&P�ty Chie En;rin8e1er EXPLANATION OF YES AND MAYBE ANSWERS IN SECTION III-ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS III A 2 Disruptions , displacements , compaction or overcovering of the soil may occur during the construction of the facilities . 3 Change in topography or ground surface relief features may occur during construction . 5 Construction will expose soils to wind and water erosion until activities are completed . B 1 The use of construction vehicles and equipment may affect ambient air quality. C 5&7 Dewatering devices may be employed during the construction of the proposed facilities . The water from the dewatering activities may be discharged to the existing flood control system. F 1&2 Noise levels may increase as the result Qf trenching and paving operations during construction . M 2&4 The traffic patterns in the construction area may be disrupted. 6 Traffic hazards in the area may be increased by construction activities . 0 1&2 Energy will be consumed during construction and the ultimate operation of the facilities . P 1 Increased use of power or natural gas may result from the larger sized facilities . 4 The implementation of the new facilities will change the existing sewerage system to accommodate growth projections of agencies with planning jurisdiction . 5 Drainage patterns may be altered during construction . R The proposal may result in the obstruction of a scenic vista during the construction process . U 3 Short term impacts associated with project construction , i .e. , traffic congestion, noise, air emissions , etc. may be significant on a cumulative basis . A mitigated negative declaration will be prepared . "W-9" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 11W-9" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 *awl (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Project: MICHELSON RELIEF SUBTRUNR AND FORCE MAIN Location : In Michelson Drive between Von Barman Avenue terminating just East of Jamboree Boulevard at the Michelson Drive Pump Station in the City of Irvine . Entity or Person Undertaking Project: A. District: County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County B. Other : Staff Determination : The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conclusion : XX 1 . The project will not have a significant long term effect on the environment because of mitigation measures incorporated; therefore, a Negative Declaration can be prepared. 2 . The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, an EIR will be required . 3-14-84 Date �77 t eral Manager "X" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "X" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 INITIAL STUDY (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) I. Background A. Name of Proponent COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #7 of ORANGE COUNTY B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 714/540-2910 C. Contact Person Hilary J. Baker , Senior Engineering Aide D. Title and Location of Project Campus Relief Subtrunk. In Campus Drive between Von Karman Avenue 1,.I and Jamboree Boulevard E. Description of Project Installation of a 15" relief trunk sewer in Campus Drive between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard necessary to serve the increased development areas east of Jamboree along Campus Drive. "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(V) (2) - DISTRICTS 11 6 & 7 "Y-1" II. Guidelines A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28. Yes x No ( If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form. ) B. Does the project qualify as: 1. Ministerial (Section 6) Yes No X 2. Emergency (Section 13) Yes No X 3. A feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes No X 4. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 40) Yes No x 5. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 36) Yes No X If yes, identify lead agency: (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. ) III. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No A. Earth. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X 2. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? x 3. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X 4. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X -2- "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(V) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "Y-2" Yes Maybe No 6. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in silation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X 7. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazard? X B. Air. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Substantial air emissions or deteriora- tion of ambient air quality? X 2. The creation of objectionable odors? X 3. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X C. Water. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Changes in currents or the course of direction of water movements in either marine or fresh water? X 2. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X 3. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X 4. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X 5. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X 6. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X 7. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X -3- "Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(V) (2) - DISTRICTS L 6 7 "Y-3" Yes Maybe No 8. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 9. Exposure of people or property to related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X D. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? X 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 3. Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X 4. Reduction in acreage of any agriculture crop? X E.. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: rd 1 . Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects? X 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X 3. Introduction of new species of animals into an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X 4. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X F. Noise. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Increase in existing noise levels? X 2. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X G. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X -4- "Y-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "Y-4" Yes Maybe No H. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X I. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X 2. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? X J. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: 1 . A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 2. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X K. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an areaT X L. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X M. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X 2. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? X 3. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? X 4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X 5. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X -5- "Y-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "Y-5" Yes Maybe No 6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X N. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1 . Fire protection? X 2. Police protection? X 3. Schools? X 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? X 5. Maintenance of public facilities, in- cluding roads? X 6. Other governmental services? X 0. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X 2. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? X P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities? 1 . Power or natural gas? X 2. Communications systems? X 3. Water? X 4. Sewer or septic tanks? X 5. Storm water drainage? X 6. Solids waste and disposal ? X Q. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 1 . Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X -6- "Y-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6, & 7 "Y-6" Yes Maybe No 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X R. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X S. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X T. Cultural Resources. 1 . Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? X 3. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X 4. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X U. Mandatory Findings of Significance. 1 . Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal , or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X -7- "Y-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(V) (2) - DISTRICTS 11 6 a 7 11Y-7" Yes May No 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, de- finitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) x 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulative con- • siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) x 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet. V. Discussion of Zoning Compatibility See attached sheet. VI. Determination (To be completed by Lead Agency. ) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. xxx I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: March 7 , 198.4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Thomas M. Dawes , Deputy Chief Engineer "Y-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "Y-8" EXPLANATION OF YES AND MAYBE ANSWERS IN SECTION III-ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS III A 2 Disruptions , displacements , compaction or overcovering of the soil may occur during the construction of the facilities . 3 Change in topography or ground surface relief features may occur during construction . 5 Construction will expose soils to wind and water erosion until activities are completed. B 1 The use of construction vehicles and equipment may affect ambient air quality. C 5&7 Dewatering devices may be employed during the construction of the proposed facilities . The water from the dewatering activities may be discharged to the existing flood control system. F 1&2 Noise levels may increase as the result of trenching and paving operations during construction . M 2&4 The traffic patterns in the construction area may be disrupted . 6 Traffic hazards in the area may be increased by construction activities . 0 1&2 Energy will be consumed during construction and the ultimate operation of the facilities . P 1 Increased use of power or natural gas may result from the larger sized facilities . 4 The implementation of the new facilities will change the existing sewerage system to accommodate growth projections of agencies with planning jurisdiction . 5 Drainage patterns may be altered during construction . R The proposal may result in the obstruction of a scenic vista during the construction process . U 3 Short term impacts associated with project construction , i .e . , traffic congestion , noise, air emissions , etc . may be significant on a cumulative basis . A mitigated negative declaration will be prepared . "Y-9" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "Y-9" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 108"ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Project: CAMPUS RELIEF SUBTRUNK Location : In Campus Drive between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard in the City of Irvine Entity or Person Undertaking Project: A. District: County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County �..r B. Other : Staff Determination : The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conclusion : XX 1 . The project will not have a significant long term effect on the environment because of mitigation measures incorporated; therefore, a Negative Declaration can be prepared . 2 . The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, an EIR will be required. 3-14-84 �"' Date s is n eneral Manager "Z" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 "Z" j TELEPHONES: j COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS s AREA 714 �� 0 �. CODE DE � 4 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �. 9 6 2-2414 P. ❑. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927ca 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY) February 29, 1984 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Addendum #1 to Existing Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Agreement for Design of Von Karman Alignment of Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract 7-8 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for services in connection with Addendum #1 to the agreement for engineering services re design of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer. Addendum #1 provides for a change in the scope of work to design the new Von Karman alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer due to the realignment ordered by the Boards of Directors in December, 1983. The fee for the work shall be as follows: Engineering Services @ Hourly Rates not to exceed $22,187 Outside Services @ Hourly Rates for Aerial Topographic Services, not to exceed 900 Soils Investigations, not to exceed 13,900 Subtotal not to exceed $36,987 Dual Track Design for Inclusion of IRWD Capacity 20,200* Total for Addendum #1 57, 87 *This item to be totally reimbursed by IRWD per their letter of February 15, 1984. The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/ Don E. Smith /s/ Evelyn Hart Don E. Smith, Chairman Evelyn Hart, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/ Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee "AA" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "AA" RESOLUTION NO. 84-37-7 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION RE CONTRACT NO. 7-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF THE VON KARMAN ALIGNMENT OF THE AIRPORT RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-8 WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in connection with design of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors on December 14, 1983, authorized a change in the alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, utilizing Von Karman Avenue and Main Street, and directed that the trunk sewer be oversized two sizes (to 39 inches) to provide adequate capacity for increased land use densities now being allowed by the local zoning authorities; and, WHEREAS, the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) has requested dual-track design to provide plans, specifications and bid documents for the Von Karman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer to receive separate bids for a 39-inch sewer to serve District 7 needs and a 60-inch sewer that would provide additional capacity for District 14 (IRWD) needs, and pursuant to IRWD's letter dated February 15, 1984, all additional costs of the dual-track design will be paid by IRWD; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement to change the scope of the work to provide for additional engineering services relative to said realignment and dual-track design; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on February 15, 1984, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "BB-1" for said services, in accordance with established procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated to that certain agreement dated April 13, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Boyle Engineering Corporation, providing for a change in the scope of the work relative to design services in connection with the Von Barman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased from $122,043.00 to $179,230.00, as follows: Agreement Total Addendum 1 From: To: � Engineering services at hourly rates, not to exceed $22,187.00 $108,843.00 $131,030.00 Outside services at hourly rates, for: - Aerial topographic services, not to exceed 900.00 4,000.00 4,900.00 - Soils investigation, not, to exceed 13,900.00 9,200.00 23,100.00 Dual Track Design for inclusion of IRWD capacity (total amount to be reimbursed by IRWD) 20,200.00 20,200.00 TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $122,043.00 $179,230.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "BB-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-38-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF DISTRICT SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated March 14, 1984, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the city of Newport Beach, providing for collection of District sewer connection charges by the City, as provided in Ordinance No. 718, is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "CC" AGENDA ITEM #9(Y) - DISTRICT 7 "CC" RESOLUTION N0. 84-39-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 108 - MAHONEY ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 108 - MAHONEY ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by Michael R. Mahoney, John B. Lyttle and Dale P. Paisley, the owners of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 82-12-7, filed with said Commission by the• District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 108 - Mahoney Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the "DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(z) - DISTRICT 7 "DD-1" r . amount of $11,565.78 has been satisfied; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99 (h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(z) - DISTRICT 7 "DD-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-40-11 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARRS AND RECREATION FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARRS AND RECREATION RE HUNTINGTON STATE BEACH PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated March 14, 1984, by and between County Sanitation District No. 11 and the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation, providing for use of sewerage facilities to serve Phase II improvements at the Huntington State Beach, and providing for payment of initial service fee plus annual operating and maintenance costs, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the State of California shall pay an initial service fee of $625,000.00 prior to issuance of connection and wastewater discharge permits; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "EE" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) - DISTRICT 11 "EE" RESOLUTION NO. 84-32 ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS �.r✓ A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-107 WHEREAS, claims for damages alleging personal injuries, including death, and to real and personal property, made against the Districts have formerly been processed by a liability insurance carrier of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the liability insurance presently in force on behalf of the Districts provides for a substantial measure of self-insured liability; and, WHEREAS, the District has the primary obligation to process claims and to provide legal defense for claims in matters of litigation filed against it; and, WHEREAS, the District has the need for the retention of adjusting services and legal counsel who shall be vested with certain limited authority to `�•►' accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: A minimum liability reserve is hereby established in the amount of $500,000.00 for the payment of claims made against the District. Said amount shall be provided for in the Districts' annual budget to insure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts not covered by liabilty insurance. Section 2: Each annual budget shall provide for sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 3: A claims investigation and adjustment firm is authorized to be "FF-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "FF-1" retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the District in an amount not to exceed $1,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agareement approved by the General Counsel. Section 4. A committee comprised of the General Manager, Finance Director, and General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any claims made against the District for liability damages not otherwise covered by insurance by payment of a sum not to exceed $10,000.00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the District's General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the District's legal counsel within the same limits. Section 5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding $10,000.00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors of the defendant District or the Joint Boards in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of additional legal counsel for purposes of representing the District in the defense of any matters of litigation, wherein he determines that specialized expertise or experience are desirable or that the workload requires the utilization of outside counsel. Section 7: Resolution No. 78-107 is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1984. "FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "FF-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-33 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE RELATING TO TAX EXCHANGES ON ANNEXING PROPERTIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE RELATING TO THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT FOR TAX EXCHANGES ON PROPERTIES ANNEXING TO THE DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the enactment of the initiative measure known as Proposition 13 on June 6 , 1978 , established a maximum real property tax limitation on all property within the State of California by adding Article XIII A to the State Constitution ; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature, subsequent to June 6 , 1978 , has enacted several statutes in order to implement the provisions of Article XIII A and to develop a system of financing local government; and, WHEREAS, California Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 95 through 100. 5 inclusive, establish formulas for allocation of real property tax revenues in those instances where service areas or service responsibility will be altered between or among governmental agencies as a result of annexation or other jurisdictional boundary changes ; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have determined that there are approximately 26 , 836 acres of territory within the County of Orange and located outside of the present jurisdictional boundaries of any Sanitation District, but which are within the tributary "GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #14 - ALL DISTRICTS "GG-1" area of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , and 11 ; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have, over a period of many months , met and negotiated with the County of Orange pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 99 . 1 and 99 . 2 , to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be reallocated between Districts and County for those areas located outside the jurisdiction of any Sanitation District but within the tributary areas ; and, WHEREAS, the negotiations were designed to achieve a single master agreement in lieu of individual agreements for each application for annexation to any Sanitation District, in order to standardize the agreement and minimize the expense to County and Districts ; and, WHEREAS, the parties have now reached an understanding relative to the approximate 26, 836 acres located within the tributary areas and sphere of influence of Sanitation Districts Nos . 2 , 3 , 5 , and 7 , and the areas within Districts Nos . 3 and 11 generally described as Sunset Beach, Bolsa Chica and U.S . Naval Weapon Station - Seal Beach; and, WHEREAS, the agreement reflects the full and complete understanding relative to tax exchange reallocations for said properties . NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanita- tion Districts Nos . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER: -2- "GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #14 - ALL DISTRICTS "GG-2" Section 1. That certain Agreement re Real Property Tax Allocation for New Service Areas of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, to be made by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7 and 11 and the County of Orange, the Orange County Flood Control District and the Orange County Beaches and Harbors District, is hereby approved; and, Section 2 . That the Chairman of each District and the Secretary of the Boards of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14 , 1984 . -3- "GG-3" AGENDA ITEM #14 - ALL DISTRICTS "GG-3" RESOLUTION NO. 84-34 ESTABLISHING A POLICY RE AMENDMENT OF DISTRICT MASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A POLICY OF ALLOWING A DISTRICT TO AMEND A CONSOLIDATED MASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS WHEN SUCH AMENDMENTS ARE SOLELY RELATED TO THE FACILITIES OF THAT DISTRICT, WITHOUT REQUIRING OTHER DISTRICTS THAT ARE A PARTY TO THE CONSOLIDATED MASTER PLAN TO ALSO AMEND SAID PLAN WHEREAS , each District presently has in force a Master Plan of Trunk Sewers pertaining to those facilities located within the jurisdictional boundaries of said District; and, WHEREAS , certain Districts have joined together to adopt a Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for a portion of the facilities within each of their respective Districts; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Joint Administrative Organization Agreement, each District has a Master Plan of Trunk Sewers, so as to be coordinated with the Master Plan of Treatment Plant Facilities jointly owned by all Districts; and, WHEREAS , the Directors have determined that in those instances wherein a proposed amendment to a Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers affects only those facilities of a given District, no significant reason exists to require said Master Plan amendment to be approved by other Districts that are a party to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers, or by the Joint Boards. "HH-1" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "HH-1" NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation y� Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6 , 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Board of Directors of each District as a member of the Joint Administrative Organization, that it approves of each individual District taking all required steps to amend its own District Master Plan of Trunk Sewers when said amendments relate solely to the facilities that serve that District only, and that Board action by other Districts and the Joint Boards is deemed waived. Section 2. It is declared to be the policy of the Board of Directors of each District that where two or more Districts have combined to approve and have in effect, a Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers, a District that is a party to, and has adopted said Consolidated Master Plan, may amend said Plan where said amendments are solely related to the facilities of that District, and that Board action by other Districts that are a party to said Consolidated Master Plan and the Joint Boards is deemed waived. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Boards of Directors held this 14th day of March, 1984 . "HH-2" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "HH-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 37 S, S, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON FEB RUA RY 8, 1934 a s, ADMINISTRATIVE'OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of .the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on February 8, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. , 4n the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the ill was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem Robert Luxembourger x Don Saltarelli Ronald Hoesterey x Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 2: a Henry Wedaa, Chairman Todd Murphy x Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. Barbara Brown x Marvin P. Adler x Sam Cooper Carrey Nelson x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger x Donald Holt Robert Kuznik x Carol Kawanami William Odlum x Bob Perry Norman Culver x Don Smith Gene Beyer x Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg x Duane winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: x Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Richard Olson x Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tem Richard Partin Barbara Brown x Marvin P. Adler x Norman Culver Bob Perry \ftyp� x Henry Frese Norma Seidel a Victor Grgas Joyce Risner x Don Griffin Jesse Davis x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger x Frank Marshott Charles J. Rell x Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper x Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Charles Sylvia Anthony R. Selvaggi x John A. Thomas Robert P. Mandic, Jr. x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg x Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Philip Maurer x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Jacqueline Heather x Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman Steven Smith __I_Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Richard Edgar Ronald Hoesterey x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger x Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran A James Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister x Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister _.I_Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder -2- 2/08/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Tom Dawes, Bill Clarke, Blake Anderson, Rita Brown, l,d Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Bob Ooten OTHERS PRESENT: Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, Milo Keith, Mike Le Blanc, Sat Tamarabuchi, Jim Anderson, Sandra Bauer * * * * * * * * * * * * * #5 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the Board of Supervisors re appointment of Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 Roger R. Stanton Harriett M. Wieder DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments A2proval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments A22roval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 2/08/84 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1984, the Chairman Nftw� ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS _ The Joint Chairman advised that the Report of the Joint Chairman Districts had recently provided a copy of the screen check review draft of the Districts' ultimate solids disposal project EIS/EIR document to the City of Fountain Valley in accordance with their request. Chairman Holt reported that the City, which was deemed a responsible agency by the General Counsel, was satisfied that the Districts had given them an opportunity to review the document, and indicated that he believed this matter was now fully resolved. Joint Chairman Holt then reported on the recent CASA General Meeting, held in ' Indian Wells on January 26-28, which he and four other Directors attended. Speakers included officials from the State Water Resources Control Board and EPA. Issues discussed at the conference included: - Privatization and financing - The State Clean Water program - Major issues facing the State Water Resources Control Board - The Federal Construction Grants program - New legal liability developments \"awl The Joint Chairman also reported that there were several discussions throughout the Conference regarding the State Water Resources Control Board and State Department of Health Services proposed regulations pertaining to waste disposal at landfills. Mr. Holt stated that as indicated in the Executive Committee's report to the Joint Boards, EPA Region IX and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board had cancelled the Districts' 301(h) waiver hearing scheduled for February 10, 1984. He then introduced Mr. James Anderson, Executive Officer of the Regional Board, who explained the reasons for cancellation. Mr. Anderson advised the Directors that ten days before the date of the hearing, EPA Region IX issued a draft of the ocean monitoring program they intended to require the Districts to carry out to comply with the waiver. Since this draft program was significantly different than the program contained in the Regional Board's draft permit, Mr. Anderson felt it was appropriate to postpone the nearing to allow the EPA, the Regional Board and the Districts some additional time to review and consider modifications to the EPA's proposed program. He indicated that the EPA program would be very expensive for the Districts to carry out, and advised the Directors that since the Porter-Cologne Act requires that monitoring programs must be cost-effective, he and his staff had scheduled meetings with the EPA staff within the next week to discuss their proposed program. Mr. Anderson advised that the National Wildlife Federation had made some formal comments to his agency regarding the Districts' permit application. He reported that their comments as well as the ocean monitoring program would be addressed in -4- 2/08/84 the new permit. .April 13, 1984, is the date to which the hearing had been rescheduled at this time. Chairman dolt then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, `ash February 29, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Wedel and Winters to attend and participate in the discussions. He also pointed out an error on the February meeting notice regarding the Executive Committee meeting in March, 1984, and advised that March 28 was the correct date for the meeting rather than March 22 as published in the notice. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on the Report of the General Manager items discussed at the AMSA Winter Conference he and the Assistant General Manager attended in Denver, Colorado in early February. Mr. Harper reported that top EPA officials spoke at the conference, and advised that EPA officials at all levels would be actively enforcing permit violations whether or not agencies had received Federal funding for upgrading their facilities. Mr. Harper reported that the Districts are currently operating without a permit pending issuance of the proposed 301(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit, but we are attempting to meet the 301(h) waiver requirements at this time. He indicated that the Districts are now meeting the suspended solids limits following operational changes we made in January, and will be taking additional steps to mitigate odors associated with the increased dewatering activities to comply with the proposed limitations. Mr. Harper advised that the staff will report to the Directors again in the near future regarding our permit requirements. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman dolt introduced Ms. Report of the General Counsel Suzanne Atkins, a staff attorney from Mr. Woodruff' s office, who was filling in for the General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Ms. Atkins called the Directors' Authorizing the General Counsel to attention to an amicus curae (friend file an amicus curae brief in of the court) brief mailed with the support of County Sanitation agenda material supporting the District No. 2 of Los Angeles position of the Los Angeles County County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) relative to public employees' right to strike. She described the action and LACSD's request to join, and advised that the CASA Executive Committee voted to support LACSD. Following a brief report by the Joint Chairman it was: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the filing of the "Friend of the Court" brief with the California Supreme Court re County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County as recommended by the General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized. Director Hanson requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" �rJ and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -5- 2/08/84 1 11 84 1 25/84 ALL DISTRICTS `...� Joint Operating Fund - $314,830.09 $219,204.20 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 80,701.11 267,618.48 Joint Working Capital Fund - 62,679.28 67,360.05 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,487.47 4,861.61 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- 767.50 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 78,278.20 9,355.66 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,001.27 14,091.36 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 67,409.62 4,885.99 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 19.70 188.10 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 30,903.64 5,492.35 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 6,149.56 6,716.28 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 816.73 2,773.55 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,981.21 17.02 $666,257.88 $603,332.15 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-107 specifications for Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107, granting a time extension of 42 calendar days to the contract with Belmont Engineering due to District-caused delays at the job site, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-107 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-12, accepting Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-108 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-13, accepting Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-118 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-14, approving plans and specifications for Installation of Four (4) pH and Four (4) Conductivity Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-118, authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached 'hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- 2/08/34 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-121 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-15, approving plans and specifications for Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-121, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Six (6) �-Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby No. A-116 receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award purchase of Six (6) h-Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-116, to GMC Truck & Coach in the total amount of $45,900.12 including tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of One (1) 4-Wheel Drive Jeep, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby No. A-117 receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award purchase of One (1) 4-Wheel Drive Jeep, Specification No. A-117, to Brian Chuchua's Jeep, Inc. in the amount of $8,904.00 including tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of One (1) 2-Ton Flat Bed Truck, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby No. A-118 receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award purchase of �.rJ One (1) 2-Ton Flat Bed Truck, Specification No. A-118, to GMC Truck & Coach in the amount of $14,860.14 including tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of 3/4-Ton Cab & Chassis with Utility Type Service That the Boards of Directors hereby Body, Specification No. A-119 receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation to reject the low bid of Theodore Robins Ford as it did not meet the engine specifications. FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby award purchase of 3/4-Ton Cab & Chassis with Utility Type Service Body, Specification No. A-119, to Jerry Goodwin Dodge, the second low bidder, in the amount of $11,443.76 including tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate and issue a purchase order to Wyss, That the Boards of Directors hereby Inc. , for purchase of 1300 Wyss authorize the staff to negotiate and Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble issue a purchase order to Wyss, Inc. , Diffusers, Specification No. E-144 c/o Bessen & Associates, in an amount not to exceed $41,000.00 plus tax and freight, for purchase of 1300 Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers, Specification No. E-144, for evaluation of improved suspended solids and 13OD removal efficiencies in a portion of the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. -7- 2/08/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate and issue a purchase order to Romac That the Boards of Directors hereby Supply Company for Purchase of authorize the staff to negotiate and Three (3) 2000 KVA Standby issue a purchase order to Romac Supply Transformers, Specification Company for an amount not to exceed No. E-145 $45,000.00 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Three (3) 2000 KVA Standby Transformers, Specification No. E-145, for use at the Foster Outfall Pumping station located at Plant No. 2. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Influent Magnetic Replacement Flow Meters, That the Boards of Directors hereby Specification No. E-142, to receive and file bid tabulation and Ponton Industries, Inc. recommendation and award purchase of Influent Magnetic Replacement Flow Meters, Specification No. E-142, to Ponton Industries, Inc. in the total amount of $119,022.00, plus tax and delivery, as follows: DISTRICTS) TRUNK LINE BID AMOUNT TOTAL SHARE OF COST 1 Talbert $12,520 1 - $12,520.00 2 Santa Ana River 17,880 2 - 17,880.00 3, 11 & Joint Interplant 21,194 ( 3 - 4,662.68 ( 11 - 847.76 (Joint - 15,683.56 3 Miller-Holder 21,194 3 - 21,194.00 3 Bushard 21,194 3 - 21,194.00 5 & 6 A & B Trunk 12,520 (5 - 3,130.00 (6 - 9,390.00 6 & 7 Airbase 12,520 (6 - 11,894.00 (7 - 626.00 TOTAL $119,022 $119,022.00 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman commended William N. Authorizing William N. Clarke, Clarke, Districts' Superintendent, upon Districts' Superintendent, to his selection as President-elect of the attend meetings and conferences California Water Pollution Control within the State of California Association. as President-elect of CWPCA and during his term as President It was then moved, seconded and duly through May, 1985 carried: That William N. Clarke, Districts' Superintendent, be, and is hereby, authorized to attend meetings and conferences within the State of California during the remainder of his term as President-elect of the California Water Pollution Control Association (CWPCA) and during his term as President through May 1985, with the approval of the General Manager; and, -8- 2/08/84 FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: 1�l Authorizing Districts' Superinten- dent, William N. Clarke, to attend That Districts' Superintendent, William the Water Pollution Control Federa- N. Clarke, be, and is hereby, authorized tion Region 8 conference in Reno, to attend the Water Pollution Control Nevada on February 23 & 24, 1984 Federation Region 8 conference in Reno, Nevada, on February 23 & 24, 1984; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file letter dated January 11, 1984, from the City of That the letter dated January 11, 1984, Cypress from the City of Cypress supporting the City of Fountain Valley in their opposition to construction of sludge disposal facilities in the City of Fountain Valley, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on January 25, 1984, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Requests for Proposals (RFP's) for Odor That the Boards of Directors hereby Containment/Treatment Facilities authorize the staff to issue Requests and Operating Procedures Study for Proposals (RFP's) for Odor Containment/Treatment Facilities and Operating Procedures Study. ALL DISTRICTS Motion to convene in closed session to Convene in closed session re meet with management representatives personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 at 8:02 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:10 p.m. , the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving management and department head compensation adjustments That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-22, approving management and department head compensation adjustments effective January 1, 1984. FURTHER MOVED: That the Executive Committee be, and is hereby, directed to review the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan to consider possible additions or revisions to the Plan. -9- 2/08/34 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and_ soecif ications re Job No. PW-123 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-20, approving plans and specifications for Piping for Return Sludge Chlorination at Plant No. 2 Secondary Settling Basins, Job No. PW-123, to improve the settling of solids, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award a contract to the low bidder in an amount not to exceed $80,000.00 A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizinq staff to proceed on a force account basis to Modify One That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Unit to proceed on a force account basis to at Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment Modify One Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Facilities, Job No. PW-124 Unit at Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment Facilities, Job No. PW-124, to improve solids capture, at a cost not to exceed $18,000.00. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , February 8, 1984. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) specifications for Rehabilitation and �..d Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , authorizing an addition of $9,988.00 to the contract with Russco Construction, Inc. for installation of additional mechanical pipe supports and thrust blocks and additional work required due to the incorrect location of the existing force main on the Cal Trans as-built plans, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for said additional work and inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment _ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , February 8, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:16 p.m. , February 8, 1984. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That the Board of Directors hereby Contract No. 3-21-2R approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Trench Reconstruction, `ad Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-2R, making miscellaneous technical clarifications. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. -10- 2/08/34 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Contract No. 3-21-2R That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-18-3, to lr.J receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-2R, to Richardson & Le Bouef Company in the amount of $213,699.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report summarizing the Final EIR on the That the Staff Report summarizing the Master Plan of Sewage Collection Final EIR on the Master Plan of Sewage Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Ms. Sandra Bauer of Michael Brandman and Verbal Report by EIR Consultant Associates made a brief report regarding the EIR, and advised that the projects reviewed in the EIR were growth-accommodating rather than growth-inducing. Ms. Bauer indicated that the only adverse effects of the projects were short-term in nature, were related to sewer construction activities, and would be mitigated. She also acknowledged a suggestion by Director Bailey to change the word "should" to "shall" on page 28 of the report and stated that the changes would be made as recommended. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written comments re Draft EIR That the written comments received after public hearing on November 9, 1983, re / Draft EIR, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Final EIR on the Master Plan of Sewage That the Final Environmental Impact Collection for Districts Nos. 2, Report on the Master Plan of Sewage 3 & 11 Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and District guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and is hereby certified. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Certifying Final Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan That the Boards of Directors hereby of Sewage Collection adopt Resolution No. 84-17, certifying Final Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Sewage Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, making certain findings in connection therewith, and adopting a statement of overriding considerations. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -11- 2/08/34 DISTRICT 3 _ Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of \WOW, Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , February 8, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , February 8, 1984. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re negotiations for acquisition of an That the Staff Report relative to easement over the Santa Ana River negotiations for the acquisition of an Interceptor Sewer, Contract easement over the Santa Ana River No. 2-14-1 Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1, in the vicinity between Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Ms. Suzanne Atkins reported that the Verbal Report of General Counsel Districts had recently discovered that the Santa Ana River Interceptor, which was built in 1973, does not have an appropriate easement in the vicinity between Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway. While the interceptor was intended to be built within existing Santa Ana River flood control easement, the property owner identified the problem when seeking permits to construct a large office complex and parking facilities in the vicinity of the interceptor. The Deputy Chief Engineer and General Counsel had met with the owner to review the estimated value of the easement, and have received a proposal from the property owner to sell the Districts an appropriate easement for $95,000, which, in their determination, is less than one-third of the $600,000 approximate value of the one-acre parcel. Ms. Atkins recommended that the Board authorize the General Counsel and the Deputy Chief Engineer to negotiate with the property owner to purchase the easement for a price not to exceed $95,000.00, as the price acceptable to the owner appears fair and reasonable. Following a brief discussion among the Directors regarding the value of the property and the limited effect of the easement on the property owner, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Counsel and Deputy Chief Engineer be, and are hereby, authorized to negotiate for and acquire an appropriate easement for the Santa Ana River Interceptor in the vicinity between Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway for an amount not to exceed $95,000.00. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Following a clarification that the Receive and file interim report proposed modified District No. 13 of the District 13 Steering boundary include only presently Committee uninhabited areas within the new District, and the notification to the cities regarding the proposed fees in District No. 13, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: -12- 2/08/34 That the interim report of the District No. 13 Steering Committee dated January 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �l Approving modification of the boundary of proposed District Tht the modification of the boundary of No. 13 proposed District No. 13 to exclude developed territory as cecommended by the District No. 13 Steering Committee in its interim report dated January 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving proposed Orange County Reorganization No. 65 - Formation That the Boards of Directors hereby of County Sanitation District adopt Resolution No. 84-16, approving No. 13 and Reorganization of proposed Orange County Reorganization County Sanitation Districts Nos. No. 65 - Formation of County Sanitation 2 and 7 District No. 13 and Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7, and directing that a proposal therefor be filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of 5.266 acres of territory to the District re That the Board of Directors hereby Annexation No. 54 - Tract No. 10523 adopts Resolution No. 84-21-2, ordering Annexation annexation of 5.266 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south of the intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Sycamore Circle in the city of Villa Park, proposed Annexation No. 54 - Tract No. 10523 to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , February 8, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of .67 acres of territory to the District re That the Board of Directors hereby Annexation No. 119 - Roberts adopts Resolution No. 84-19-7, ordering Annexation annexation of .67 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Highcliff Drive and Newport Boulevard in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 119 - Roberts Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 The Deputy Chief Engineer reported that Receive and file engineer's report at the January, 1984 Board meeting, the on sewerage facility requirements Boards engaged Boyle Engineering for the expanding development in Corporation to prepare a report on the Irvine Business Complex area additional sewerage facilities required to serve the rapidly expanding Irvine Business Complex area. The consultant has submitted the report which was mailed to the Directors with the agenda. -13- 2/08/84 Mr. Dawes summarized the report which identifies major changes in development patterns and densities in this 2,500 acre area that began last year. The Deputy Chief Engineer advised that in addition to the new alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer to Von Karmen approved by the Board in December, 1983, more facilities will be needed to serve the Complex, and reported that the staff was presently reviewing three new facilities proposed in the consultant's report. He indicated that the construction cost estimates for these proposed new facilities totaled approximately $1.3 million, and additional engineering costs would also be incurred. He further advised that the staff was considering recommending establishment of a special zone in this area in which connection fees would be set in an amount to recover the cost of the additional facilities necessary to serve the new development. This approach is consistent with the District's long-standing policy of collecting connection fees from new development to pay for facilities required to serve it. The Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion regarding sizing of the lines serving the Complex, the levels of development already approved by the City of Irvine, the anticipated amounts of the proposed fees, and the ability of the proposed facilities to provide service to IRWD should they decide to form District No. 14. The General Manager advised the Directors that a detailed staff report and a proposed draft urgency ordinance setting a fee for this zone would be presented for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting of the District tentatively scheduled for February 15. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Irvine Business Complex sewerage facilities study submitted by Boyle Engineering Corporation dated- February 1, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and referred to Directors and staff for study and consideration at an adjourned meeting to be held February 15, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, February 15, 1984, at the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m. , February 8, 1984. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -14- fLIND NC .IT DIST WCP.KIN6 CAF ITAL PF'OCLSSING DALE 1/6f•/A4 PAUF 1 RFI`ORT NUMDEP AF43 COUNTY SANITATION 015TRICTS OF OkANCE CAUNTY CLAIMS PAID O1/I1/A4 WAPRAP•rl PC. VLN(+OP AVOUNT DI.SCRIPI ION n6711,5 A-AAD ELFCTRONICE• SALES 76!.51 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i:�71pit tL'C LUN.PER CORE. 44.98604 LUMBER rr7 Ili 7 AIR CAL1F(.RAIA 1.179.1!6 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS Cf7111 Ate rpPF.UCTS 8 CHEVJCALS. INC. 1I14J.' 1' SPECIALTY GASES fllr r1++ IReGOCTs• R 0•F"jCAIS•1('C. 1"4N4.3'. WELDING SUPPLIES ,!671';( ALLICD SUFFLY CO. 1•,825. 15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (l 71'.;I AmCkTCAN �CIFNTIFIC PRCDUCTS S264.1`10 LAB SUPPLIES Pf"; AAAHEII' SEWER CRKSIRUCTION T4.250.00 CSDOC NII REPAIRS G671 IIOE ANCHOR FICKINr- CO. $19291.134 PUMP PARTS .:r71"4 Ar:(l!. FEN CCLF. 1211.9114.7E CHEMICAL COAGULENTS ( 71"`. A1,140W-P[SC0• INC. 1365.49 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �67156 6AKFR PLY660D CO., INC. $243.17 SMALL HARDWARE :!57157 RANK OF APERICA A.T 8 SA 11.1311.63 TRAVEL EXPENSES C671`.+F UECKRAN INSTr'.•••rPITS Sl.z.'9.7" ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES r671^" P►:LL PIPF R <O,oi 1.Y rP. 124.31' PIPE SUPPLIES rf7^;i. rf.VCr 113a.Pf ELECTRIC CART PARTS ctl:'!1 Flr PO PENIAL CC. TI.275.0P TRASH DISPOSAL i4 7?o? rIRSINGFAF GfVELCFPFNT T419.64 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT �O C`E7215 !.ONIS AIR CONDITIONING 5133.CO TRUCK REPAIRS ((.7,•04 PUENA PARK LUMPEP 9 IiAf+DLtRf T864.71 LUMBER ?f 7;G'+ TNr FUPKF C114PAMY `.•24=.14 PIPE SUPPLIES f-7.' f 1•I1PKE I'NCIKELRINU CC. 1.4,4.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES f7;; 7 VucINiFZ FLI'L11i,rff 1P;r. 1274.40 SUBSCRIPTION :Of•7c++r. iU1LER CIVELfI1V;_KT CO. $163.22 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT L67'1.115 C e P FECONDITIONING CO. 1653.00 PUMP REPAIRS (:( 7210 CS rOMFANY 1.5^L.21 VALVES r+F7211 CALIF. ASSCrrAT1rA CF PUFLI( ,Ik9.PU SEMINAR REGISTRATION (•r7, 3: Cf.Lr1LYNFIC VI r• SAFETY 5`r4.F(- SAFETY SUPPLIES F7 i? CARVFNIIh F'CR11 TP11CK ;AL[S- IP. I1•.1:; 45' TRUCK PARTS f.67i1n JOHN CASON f383.till ENGINE PARTS nF.1;1`. CI1FVAON U.S.A., INC. 159858.03 ENGINE OIL 061ilf. CI(ICI7 6AKF. FISP FAF-V S62.7U LAB SPECIMENS 0(.7^1T R.r+. CLLFF C0.. IJ• 11n5.P9 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES O•( 7. !,' CLA1>K [ YE I AG1,C/itt LFI.13 SHALL HARDWARE i 7: 1 C(IPPUT!CAit (r. '?II."'• COMPUTER SUPPLIES ( i;; is CL'Nr1CL L f,hF VROI r T !1•2!6•.34 TRUCK PARTS 4( 7:=:1 C'O%c�OLICAIEL ELFCTRICAL VIST. $6.211q ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :f-7:'.;' CONTINEKIAL AIF IDOLS, INC. 12.195.24 TOOLS r'f 7�i" Cr,kTINFNTLL CIO' FiCAL CC 11�.41+i.�-n CHLORINE •1; 771;". rOL11•TYAHI! AF:•V( IIIF 1f,1A.if) PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT i t ►;'' 1,141 . I V(- .i'1411.13 ENGINE PARTS (f-1;:F GtnFL1a (OFF. ito146-.29 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT b IF.7;•••7 f•FC11 1.356.47 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 4( 1:;I• VELPrI `Y:TLI;S% IF.C. 1r.5 1;0 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES nF'l^?c 1'Ir:I7AL FCUIFMr41 (W)P. 1:?-. 1 OFFICE SUPPLIES :f 7:"?•: I;I'A0! 4i'L1. 1.A`:1' !:Y' 1rF"`,. 1'"'( i' i.':. l PIPE SUPPLIES FURL: LC `]'.9 - JI rlSl WCF•KTA6 CAPITAL FFOCESSING LIAlf I/vs-/N4 F-AGF RFPORI PIUMPFR AI'4} COUNTY SPNIlkTION UI>TPIC1S OF ORANGE CCIINTY CLf TMS; PAIr, nl/11/114 NAi.FaAT Kr•. VENil A UAlI F`I ,,r!•II11r1I't u 7 2 3 1 110UGLA;-CROW• 1RVINr $1./:.3.61) PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT Ot723P GUNN CI16APDS COFF• tIP3.12 PAINT SUPPLIES ^( 7:.'.!• fIAC0 a44Fl.ri3 ENGINE PARTS rE7"'4 fA1lIVAA, INC . 11• 0 1.-7 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11 1SVILIAr, Fit*[ t. �ffiIY 141.i[ PIPE SUPPLIES Ii,77'(- F.rUFAL EXIR(_S!% GRs 1,45.70 DELIVERY SERVICE ft.7?37• FII.ruR :,UFPLY CO. 141.1)7 ENGINE PARTS ".E1G'11 FI CHER F. FCHIIP CC. 1109.53 PIPE SUPPLIES c1.7.?:" CI11 Of F•CLNTATN VALLI 175c . WATER USEAGE LP774( FPC"I FKCIAi:fHINIC 5iRVICF° L0. i.l?}s.19 VALVES '.;,7;•r11 4.t;? FAL FLEC.IPIC 5111'1-1 Y ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I:f./;�4:' GFI:;k A L IF.L[rHCNL C.0. 1511.30 TELEPHONE r:E724x H_'RTZ CAP LFASIKG 75?7.54 VEHICLE LEASE n(7?44 PULON POVEES $11':34.Q4 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT t7.145 F.S. HuCHFS CO., 11.4l. 1152.06 PAINT SUPPLIES f'r7:4f n0141.FY IIIAI Co. 164It4.•1R PIPE SUPPLIES D 1*r7''47 1UPLEY ELICTFOI;ICS, IHC. 1.121.2C ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I t6.1<41i I+Y!1PCTFx 12.'141.24 ENGINE OIL fV 6U774" 1SCo CrFpAKY 1316.5P BATTERIES INFf.P1fL ULS:T (I'FI<ICAL CC.. 1.3.72e.42 FERRIC CHLORIDE c; 7 1NI;I!FTkIAL rP OFF ;c 1.1, 542.32 TOOL REPAIRS r6..7:`•.0 1N it,Ar it 1.11.4P COMPUTER SUPPLIES 67,_" ' i(.TEliox ArIPICA 11.:'G1.44 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, TANK RENTAL [ 7154 THI IRVINE CC. $1-62.3.511 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT OG7;E•r• 1RVIAE INCLSTRI/'L CCMFLFY 11101111.45 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT IRVINE PANCH WATEP VISTRICT 1L:1.5G WATER USEAGE na7:.. 7 JULIAN CONSIrOFTICH 1.1 .E+16.141 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT t:pi! "AEI I rPVPUCIS I t8. I I SAFETY SUPPLIES C7;°` F-!N-KUT AI-F15IVf fr. 111.1.7!., TOOLS L17?i4 KELNAN I IFE & SU11LY CO. 1.1•iG9.54 PIPE SUPPLIES LE7,'E1 KEITH F. 45SOCIATE: t4,;lU0.00 PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF LOS ALAMITOS TRENCH REPAIRS fb72(2 FiNG TIFACING. IfIC. +411 .05 BEARING SUPPLIES .E7,^f3 KI!t.^.T FLF:n r. 1ta(1}InF uf.t.ht• t%}GF.pP PUMP PARTS :!v7;-t4 FL1.LF.-L!I%L COHF 1117.tt• JANITORIAL SUPPLIES t 1;, THl KCLL CrV.FA;%V 1; 1.tit PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT 6( 7: E! L.r.w.S.• I%C♦ iJ.7f WELDING SUPPLIES 1! 1.,E7 W.F. LA FUTILE CO• I153.04 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT ii7.(+ti L%Ur5fI,' COLOR LAI: :44.Iit FILM PROCESSING A 7', Llt!CN 1,CIF•I.IS LIV. 1.1 , 1{'I.$a3 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT 41; 7i: LILr71>.f. F1'TFIrLIf•,'S, 11,r , lIf,."a" ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES L• At 1.LI C1,iVI[II ('C. 1 1•' "'..4f• HERBICIDES 1:(•7?7;' L!t;.bl 1. Af!.rl1tIi :• iH:,,hi1.J" ENGR. 2-23, 2-10-IA, 2-25. 3-211-1 , 3-24-2, 3-25 it( 7;)7 it,A!:VAC FLEIIF1)NI[ f 14-4,rr ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES rf7',7,1 VAll - Cl'LI:It• 1!4*. i.; . I!`+.3�• PIPE SUPPLIES :f.7;'7r Pr UPAW-I•ILI 1-11"I Ift11('Wk Cc. !• :'.t. Ir' SLUDGE RFP ADVERTISEMENT '1 1:'Jr I'('! .�• 1! •J-!'A°'� 1}t I.Y C; . ' I i. '•r' SMALL HARDWARE 7 FlIf1L t.0 plri4 - JT I;IS1 1(;Rh1Nn CAl ITAL rFQ(ESSING UAIL 1/4(4114 PAGE F•FF OF,I fIl1MOF.P AI'4? C('UNTY FtNI TAT ION 01 SIR ICTS OF OkANH COUNTY C"LAIIAS PA II' (I)/11/84 1.'rRF.t1,1 Cn. VI r.1 (1F 4FOUNI III S("k1117ICN (:67277 PIGLANC VALVF R GtUGF. 624.00 VALVE SUPPLIES P( I271: GFGRGE. YILLF'Is CGASIPUCFInN t72.422.74 RETENTION i-2R-I 1:1-7;7q MIrjF trF 1Y AI'1'I fANCF G CO, 1bFQ.17 SAFETY SUPPLIES rI!•CC S,4s12.?:f PIPE SUPPLIES r 7:al Vl1 170 I,;n.n5 OFFICE SUPPLIES f 7;s :' f..i.. NC111IZ FGl1r'11kY I1026.4U MANHOLE RING L COVERS F(•7;;1, MYC0 1f:r:U`•IPIE!; 1292.91 SMALL HARDWARE f:67,,1.4 PYFFiS, TlRr. 'UI'I"LY $218.71 TRUCK TIRE SUPPLIES �( 7is+! NfLFON 11ROS. CONSTr:UC7ION $244.?E PLAN CIIECK OVER-DEPOSIT f 7^t c C I TY OF 14LWI OR I fFLF11 x:71 WATER USEAGE ri 7:'117 1111 r.tlb•Ar,I C010. 1SS!1.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :( I�*1+1• GLYMFIC C11-FKICAL CO. s15,57It III BULK CHLORINE If.7:pc VRGNGF LGLKly GEV. COPF. 1426.88 PLAN CIIECK OVER-DEPOSIT 0( 72'!L• GRANGE COUNTY FAPV SUFPLY CO. 1137.95 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES ('f•7?cl G1iANGE VALVF R F 1If ING CC. s3114.55 PIPE SUPPLIES CVIaI,FAO COOP CO ('F r-P1tlCC CTY 1142.54 DOOR REPAIRS ,f.7 3 C1;YC-FIT SFRVICE• 5727.7L SPECIALTY GASES, WELDING SUPPLIES t> I'( 7254 COUNTY SAAIIAIIGN 1)ISTRICT $2r9Q4.97 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND I Cie7P7E 1'aG INDU11141f5• INC. 1491.50 PAINT SUPPLIES W u 7gnf, PACIFIC F(N('F CO. $15.00 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT 1672117 FACIFIC TFLFGnONF 4:122.55 TELEMETERING 0 7�c-P IALLFT`• f ACCF.f:,nF• 11S CO. a•7.f.{17.F1 PALLETS Cf1::`r F o F I S UALIVIIL0 t1.245.5' TRUCK PARTS :.173';l: fLRVA-CAL LCI:I•GRAI Iff. t65U.5'4 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C673G1 PICKLi1CK rAF'F.F I:k(;VUCIC $1t122.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Ch73C? PITNFY COLES t84.27 POSTAGE METER RENTAL v67.-(%? FOPIFR I101LFF !=rRV1('C. 1FlC.. 4494.5E BOILER REPAIRS i F.77 4 r 10.1 F Acti P 1:.:Lu.'ll POSTAGE v17'i`, I,(10-r I•KL NY IFtiG. IPC. 11144.nG CONCRETE 1!1 ;.`f! 1,t.L'OLO FRINkOSi ILI L30.00 INDUSTRAIL WASTE SAMPLING ICE ;( 71t:7 RAFFERIY 1WTF'Pf! TIOFJAL PRICK!• 4727.35 TRUCK PARTS 't71(I RAIMPOV OISFOVAL Cn. L334.01JI TRASH DISPOSAL (f 7,1411 TIiF PFCI�TFR t.'•"Is It.3`. LEGAL AND CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING r r'Iu I:!!- F:EIL'•LIC Sll('ClN C.n. Of 1A65.64 PIPE SUPPLIES � r'11 Plil PIN, F PH YF1,!, 16'1.2" FREIGHT T67,•.1:' PUS!-CC, COI,�.IVUCTION. INC. Sbf,.352.H1 CONTRACTOR 5-18R Gf.7G13 S.f•.F. VAC11INf PY F%G.r IIJC. II.445.00 ENGINE REPAIRS C•C".7x14 FANfA AAA I.COGF 1.461.21s TRUCK PARTS Ili,7,.I`• SAA;TA AN ILIC1111C V,07Ok.- si11:5.p,. ELECTRIC MOTOR ,4 'l`If l:r.I,TA I S" ! t:, CC 147`.flt BUILDING, MATERIALS f l'17 pr,uII tlCi1:C I.4E.`� PLAN CIIECK OVER-DEPOSIT �CLF'US CCRI'. S=i52.yu MINI COMPUTER SUPPLIES k.7:1" SFVEN-UP PGTT1.IrIG CC. 123.564.6! USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT (0!732U �HAVFCCK $1,1'PLY S3,31 1.P3 TOOLS FhAU• AKkCT. K(11.1 . I Tn. $?,n'7.1 PLAN CIIEKC OVER-DEPOSIT i 7.'•'" >Nhi -tit, FLrI !• l r 1.1 11(,2.t" TOOLS r � _FUND NC S19'j - JT DIST I:CRKIN4-CAI I-TAL----- ----•- _ .. _ FROCESSINL- DATE I/IG6/I44 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER A1143 C.OUNIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANGE COUNTY l CLAIMS NA II) n1/1I/84 WLNRANT k0i. V(.NCOP AMOUNT ULSC.RIFTION 667'23 �OUTII COAST OFFICE COU1PIt[N7 E45.R6 OFFICE MACHINES 4673.24 SOUTHERN CALIF . EOISON CO. 12051933.5p POWER 1167325 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. S?2.1;G WATER USEAGE Lt 7d2(- SGUTI.EPN C.CUNT115 OIL CO. i410.15 DIESEL FUEL :.-67.':17 VEPP',AN F. SlIC.HT tV.1 INC. 1214.47 METER cf. 1.21! llif SUPFLIEI?S 421538.37 - TOOLS 0( 7�*Q J. WAYNE SYLVESIEP $19112.64 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT C4.7330 TELETYPE CORF • 1107.4E OFFICE SUPPLIES 1167.131 F.K. THCRAS AIP CONDITIONING $360.00 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE ( 1:,'.(' 1f;.AFFIC CCKI140L PI RV IC.1.1 1NC. 1126.Ui. SAFETY SUPPLIES (.i 11 1NAILSIDE 11Ul'(S 1331.22 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT 1iG73:s4 IRANSAKERICA OFLAVAL SR1.Q2 VALVES (F-7?3b TRUCK R ALTO SUFPLYI INC.. $994.45 TRUCK PARTS OF 73,'•6 TUI ESALES 1,383.72 PIPE SUPPLIES 6F7 7 UNITED FAPCFL '(PVT(:[ $163.40 DELIVERY SERVICE � (7;;1' UNITED STATCS E(UIVFEN1 C0.1 I tll?.(•6 COMPRESSOR PARTS L67'? VwR SCIENIIFTC $1 7A LAO SUPPLIES � ::L1Z4:- VALLEY CITILS SUPPLY CO. $A3 .35 PIPE SUPPLIES 0(7'Ili I VA0E(;1 INC. $31.64 FREIGHT .)FI?4; JOHN R. WAF'LES L.5N2.R0 ODOR CONSULTING nt.7%43 I:ARPIN K RAILF Z`4?9.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C.t 7�44 WAL+KCS1•11 Et.t IMF S.CRVI(FNIF.f 1-1 .113.1E ENGINE PARTS ••1.1?1.5 VISTERP. WISE L PLIUY£ $11U11.14 WELDING SUPPLIES ;it•7346 RGURKL £ CCCI%RUI'T1 INC. $179501.21 LEGAL SERVICES, TRAVEL EXPENSES 6F7'47 YFROX CGP1'. i-143.11` OFFICE SUPPLIES AE7!4P EVERETT H. YOPK CO. $445.71 ENGINE PARTS ----------------- 1014L CI.AlltS FAIL (1/11/04 ?bf.fil?57.1+N f FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/06/84 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/11/811 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $ 2, 148. 15 #2 ACO FUND 29,700.00 N2 F/R FUND 46,430.05 N3 OPER FUND 1 ,701 . 27 N3 ACO FUIID 4,000.00 N3 F/R FUND 12,300.00 N5 OPER FUND 1 ,056.81 #5 ACO FUND 66,352.B1 96 OPER FUND 19- 70 #7 OPER FUND 30,903.64 #11 OPER FUND 1 ,899.56 #11 ACO FUND 11,250.00 N5L6 OPER FUND 816.73 N6L7 OPER FUND 2,981 .21 JT OPFR FUND 314,830.09 1 CORF 80,701 . 11 Ul SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 492.50 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2,9911.97 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 62,679.28 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/11/84 $666,257.88 i FUP:L NC g159 - JT DIST WCPKING CAH TAL FPOCE§SING DATE 1/1`1/N4 (AG1 ? REPORT NUMBElz AF43 COUNTY �ANTTAlICN IIIS1RICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIP:'.: PAIf WAPRAMT NO. VCNFOR AMOUNI f`uSCRIPIIION 4E.7Z70 ADVAHCO CCNSTRUCTORS. INC. 125075.70 CONTRACTOR P2-27 0F•7171 AEFCO CCNCRLSSOPS. INC. $51.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS I%( 7_'72 ALL -S7A1C VEHICLES, INC. 1,19224.92 VEHICLE LEASING CE.7;73 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 1666.111 AIR CONDITIONING CONTROLS ^.( 73711 AMERICAN AIR FILTEF9 IkC. 777.21 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE CF7375 AMEk1CAN CCNCRLTL CUTTING. INC 1.111701.00 JUNCTION BOX REPAIRS (,f.7'7(• APEPICAN SCIEN71FIC PFOOUCIS 1234.30 LAD SUPPLIES 067�77 AMFk1CAN SIGMA 1468.E0 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (F 7,171, IHf. ANChCP TACK I NC CO. 1945.?I1 PUMP PARTS CE7.'.74 ANGELICA RENTAL SIkV1C.FS $113.00 TOWEL RENTAL ;E7'f1ll AOUt Prk COPP. 117.46R.1C CHEMICAL COAGULENTS (673111 ARROW-RISCO• INC. 1.139.55 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES f673P? ASSOCIATION OF NEIROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES 34.781.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 0673P3 BANK OF AMFRICl. NT E SA 160.1A TRAVEL EXPENSES :'67'I'll I'ECAMAN IASTRUFLN F $3.415.26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (67'1,5 PFLL VICE L SUPPLY CO. $376-1`1�_ PIPE SUPPLIES f-( 77If( VtLMONI [III61NECRING 12119940.40 CONTRACTOR PW-107 11673N7 PIERLY A At$OCIATFS9 INC. t550.11D WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATORS Z tE7iPf1 GOP!"S AIR CONDITIONING 1520.66 TRUCK REPAIRS I L( .. POMAR NAGNF.7O SERVICE. INC. $298.02 ENGINE PARTS I-" r( i_c•0 hCYLl the W ER INC- COF.P 1.1 0113.73 MASTER PLAN UPDATE N70 SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT u( 7'tI NICHACL FRA&E-Ft ) 6 ASSOC..INC 15.512.q7 CSOOC N2,3, 11 MASTER PLAN EIR :•E 7 Q< Tiff' CURKE COMPANY ?232.02 PIPE SUPPLIES 067393 t!UTICR ENGINEERING. INC. s3q.191.56 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-23/P2-24, P2-23-6 CLAIM CE•7*1i4 C 1: R PF.CCNIIITIONING CO. $310.00 PUMP REPAIRS PE7375 CPT CALIFCPNIA. INC. 1816.QG WORD PROCESSOR MAINTENANCE F•1211, CS COFf AMY 14.13.26 VALVES Ci7.'.c7 C.II.i .C.A. 5.2.10.110 SEMINAR REGISTRATION (( Iirf- CAL-GLASS FCP PESFARCII. IP'f. 19.6.53 LAB SUPPLIES (.6739y CAL-PAC CI•F.PIICAL Co., INC. 1.39.16 DESCALER :E74GC CALIF. ASSOC. OF SAP.. AGENCIES $19650.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES �674f:1 THE CAP TELEfHONF CO. s45.RR PAGER REPAIRS ^674U. .101IN CA1)0LL6 IPtFINtIF5 S41.Q29.4N ENGR. J-15, PI-20, P2-25-2, ENERGY TASK FORCE :F7n:: JOIN CAROLLG ENC.INf.FkS $(•.?74.IP ENGR. P2-26, ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPSOAL (•E74f4 FONTIE Cl.P.TEF CONSTPLICTIGN 3.7.183.49 MIXING TANK REPAIRS 'It 7a()F, CHAMBER-Ply CONCP.ETF. INC. 1242.03 BUILDING MATERIALS �E746F CHEVPON U.S.A.. INC. 113.212.Q6 GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL (674C7 CONVOCK COMPANY 1652.67 BUILDING MATERIALS 'i674(•11 COGEOLIDAIEL f_LE.CTFICAL f 1`•T. $2.571.53 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i 1,74G C0-NFr-L IOAII V 411PL1,1!C710b., 1?.49'4.50 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 6741C: CCNTINENTAL CIO[FICAL CC 12.187.!14 CHLORINE E7411 COOFEP. F.NEP.GY SiNVICES i1.;147.J6 ENGINE PARTS E7412 COUNTY ►:ICE APC. 1424.31 TRUCK PARTS Of•7413 COUV70N F. ASSCCIATFS 1570.00 CSDOC k1 ,6,7 MASTER PLAN EIR rE7�la CRCVLFY IAVII:OKVrf!IAL 'rf,VTCf!� clf:?.IF JANITORIAL SUPPLIES F 741` f1.1_ CON-OL II:7.If to vA7EF 1(,4.7? WATER SOFTENER RENTAL • d FUND NO 91CO - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/19/114 PAC-1 REFORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORCMCE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 71/25/R4 WAF11PANT AG. Vf NDCR AMOUNT fl1 SC11IF T I ON f6741b Dec, INC. IIAR.93 TRUCK PARTS I-b7417 DANA MFG.+ INC. $922.73 PUMP REPAIRS rf741f E•EC0 tQ2.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (.f 7 4 1° Ci.LF F-1 SYSICF'S. INC. 4117110.9E PENSION PLAN PROGRAMMING -4 74;; E-IFILIFFC ASSOCIATES 189.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES P67421 CODGE CCNSIRUCTION NEWS 1205.00 LEGAL ADVERTISING 667422 DORADO ENTERPRISES• INC. $549677.42 CONTRACTOR PW-110, ENGINE REPAIRS A67423 DUF:AS CIESEL INJECTICK S3+?68.63 ENGINE PARTS Cf74F4 DUNN EChAQCS CCRF. 1224.07 PAINT SUPPLIES :C74;` F1F'CG FRCCES.`• FCUIF. Co. 1644.46 PIPE SUPPLIES nf74'.6 LASTMAN. INC. 12.842.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES O(-7427 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE $459190.00 CO-COMBUSTION FEASIBILITY STUDY 06742E ENVIRCKIPEATAL FRCDUCTS INT•L. $39.373.12 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Oi.7429 ENVIROAF'F.ATAL RESCURCE ASSOC. $239.50 LAB ANALYSIS i.c74Z0 tAVIROSPOLPI, CC. I92.9v CSDOC N5a6 MASTER PLAN EIR A(.74.1.1 FA14CO 1240.1E DRAPES f(.7432 FAVILIAN r-IVE R SUPPLY 175.6R PIPE SUPPLIES Cf743.3 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. E24.00 DELIVERY SERVICE t.67434 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CC'. 178.59 LAB SUPPLIES 1 f`J !.67435. FLAT 8 VERTICAL CONCRETE 1124.00 CORE DRILLING 2 !1,74:4 CLIFFOFC A. FOFKERI 1.720.0C SURVEY P2-26 (•74'7 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMFPA 19.54 FILM PROCESSING ^f74'_f FRFMONT IACEP(IITY CG+sI'RI I 13.424.fl7 SURETY, PW-098 ff7439 FRUIT CRCUERS LAL•ORATORY+ INC. 1.26.00 LAB ANALYSIS 66744E FULCO SALES 11.279.95 SMALL HARDWARE CE-7441 CITY OF FULLERTON 137.64 WATER USEAGE [7-42 GEF:EFAL T`.LEFPCIP'C CO. 17915R.iP TELEPHONE l,'-P IPJSTPUVF.N1 COMPANY 1221.07 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 6LLFRIN SLFFLY CG. �•Ift1.26 SMALL HARDWARE ::67445 E.G. F:ELLER+S SOA9 INC. 1246.46 TOOLS GC,74lib 11O1-CHEM9 INC. $129210.34 CAUSTIC SODA C67447 R.S. HUGHES CO.9 INC. $191.38 SAFETY SUPPLIES :f7441 CITY' OF HLNIINCTOW PEACH $1I.A2 WATER USEAGE �f744r- ICC INSTRUMENT $24•57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i1-74`. C. iSC(l CCMfAi.Y 1.1911Q6.68 FLOW MONITORING DEVICE LEASE 667451 IMPERIAL GIST CHF.F'1CAL CO. 13 022.20 FERRIC CHLORIDE +'G7452 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 128./1 BUILDING MATERIALS 4674G3 INVUSTF JAL IfIRE.ADUD PRODUCTS 51'4.05 SMALL HARDWARE if•74°4 INTCROX APEPICA 1•;+ti'1.=5 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE TANK RENTAL i(:745!, 1PVIAL SWEFt'ING SLPVICf' 740N•r,Z PLANT MAINTENANCE 1174F.f. JOY IAF.LfACTURIF'i, CC. ill•"4 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C•67457 KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS 1151.43 SAFETY SHOES 06745t1 KING RFARING9 INC. 1399E n•°6 BEARING SUPPLIES ff.7459 1. F N UNIFr..F.M vUl'FLY CO S49344.n7 UNIFORM RENTAL c(•74(.�- 1..�'.b.`•.. ]PC. 11.11'.26 WELDING SUPPLIES 1'E74(-I L4 VC17C Cf•(PICAL r4CULWIF 147.44 LAB SUPPLIES e FUNS NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKINr, CAFITAL PRCCI"SSING DATE 1/14/A4 FAGF ' REPORT NUMBFk Ar43 COUNTY SAIJITATION DISTRICTS OF GPANCE COUNTY (LAIN!, PA IF) nl/25/l44 WAFFANT MC. VFNVOR AMOUNT fit erF,IPTION (!67462 LAURSCN CCLCR Lr,E $95.13 FILM PROCESSING P67463 LEVCC ELECTFTC CO. I4A5.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (-67464 LICIITIFJG CISTRIFLTCR!z9 INC. 1.263.70 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ;674(.r LOCAL AGFNCY FCRMAIION C01111SSION 1391.00 ANNEXATION 8112 PROCESSING FEE F..74E6 Tiff CHARLI'S LC1.F CO. L9?.25 PUMP PARTS It7467 FANIICLF ACJUSTING t19359.00 CSDOC #2,3 MANHOLE REPAIRS F674E1: HARDER SUSCC $149598.32 PW-102A PIPING, ^(.74(-9 MATT - CIILOP• INC. 1,102.22 PIPE SUPPLIES !.( 74if. PCKINLFY EF.UIPHF.NT Cnpt 5245.35 TRUCK PARTS 'F74i1 VCMARTF9-CARR S(JPF'IY CO. $3n.34 PAINT SUPPLIES :•E7M172 MITCPELL NINUALS• INC. 1A2.2C PUBLICATIONS Cf7a13 POtITCONCRY ELEVATOR COMPAFJY 1299.4P PLAN'F R2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE •'1---7474 MOTOROLAI INC. SRvO35.29 BASE STATION COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 11167475 NATIONAL LUMBER SUPFI.Y $176.26 SMALL HARDWARE :(14IF NAT1GNAL ECKICS 1553.8( LAB SUPPLIES (.(-7477 CITY OF NEVFORF bEACIt *33.F' WATER USEAGE ;(747f CCFAN :•ACT CC.. INC. 1.616.75 SALT E7479 OLYC'IP1C cI-EvIcAL Co. $8.1A6.§4 BULK CHLORINE l7d f(-74P3 CRANGE VALVL A FITTING CO. $3.329.82 PIPE SUPPLIES 1 067491 ORITEX CORF 3117?0.67 SMALL HARDWARE W i( 7412 OXYG(N Sr_RV7"( 1.AS.I I - SPECIALTY GASES, DEMURRAGE (-74P3 COUNTY CF LI"i.hlI S2-332.°5 TESTING P2-26, QUARTERLY PAGER MAINTFIIANCF (E71-F4 CCUNTY SANIII•TION FISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 129794.II REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND P674F5 ORANGE COLNiY WATER DISTP10 19180.7? WATER PRODUCTION C674H6 PACIFIC MCGILF. OFFICES 5190.92 PLANT #2 TRAILER RENTAL C674F.7 PACIFIC BELL 1.333.AR TELEMETERING : E7'.(k PAPT!z UALIF'iILI' I 92C.44 TRUCK PARTS PFRMA-CAL CCRFOPAIION V)75.34 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (i 745C FEkl'A FURt F•RC^.,UCTS. II.C. 11.781.?2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (•67491 PITNEY Pours $75.06 POSTAGE METER MAINTENANCE P67442 QUALITY BLILDINr• SUPPLY SP3.14 BUILDING MATERIALS 067491'• TIIC REPUPLIC SUPPLY CO. OF CALIFORNIA, INC. ►42.96 PIPE SUPPLIES ,E74"'4 PE.YF.OL1. ALLF'INUF• S(Jt'FLY CC. .1.1 STEEL STOCK 674`f! FPIChARVIS ! DFAIILI('S 1=4ti.�7 TRUCK REPAIRS 1.6740E fOFI'INS F 149 791.4 1 PUMP PARTS (67497 THECDORI ROPINS FORD $29.75 TRUCK PARTS (•6749FS SANCON INC. $1 9 0 0 n.0 U ZEBRON COATING OF SLUDGE TRAILER (•(.74°O SAND DCLLAF 6USINFSS FORMS 1140.91• OFFICE SUPPLIES ii.Y!,iU SLARS9 RCE( LCK F. C(•. 1.29623.52 TOOLS ?rIt.I1 SHI.LLi.F F. LLIiP- INr. i e.1a4.6() ENGR. 5-18R r67` C7 SHI(1HOC.K S01FLY 11.472.57 TOOLS/SMALL HARDWARE C67F(. SHCPHARC NArI.1MFRY Co. $39;,33.70 ENGINE REPAIRS 0E7E64 SIPS INrUSTRIAL SUPPLY i' ?3. WELDING SUPPLIES CF7°P5 C(IARLFS SFTTH CO.9 INC. i Ali.72 TRUCK PARTS aE7°'I SC. COAgT Agi.' CUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 111-4.29 PUBLICATIONS ^(-7'.177 "(011F111% CI.I IF. f.I.IsnA. c( SJ1'a.3 It,.17 POWER AV FUND AC ci195 - JT DIST RCPKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING Dt.TE 1/19/94 PAL-1 4 REPORT tiumscF AF43 COUNTY SANITAIION DISTRICTS OF OPANGE COUNTY CLA TMS VA II' 01/25/114 1,11PRt•N1 N0. VENDOR AMOUNT nFSCR II`T ION (it 7E00 SO. CAL. CAS CP. $119212.66 NATURAL GAS b( 75C9 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 911.357.3E DIESEL FUEL L67`_1P COUTHNFST FLEX19ALF SEVFP Fu111F I Intl.FI VALVES '67�-11 SI-FEIE Sr(I ! OliITEP 12F2 41? TRUCK PARTS f( 7! 12 STARGW STE'._. 1.1.1r; 44 - STEEL STOCK .:67G13 SUPER CLEM CORP A636.06 CHEMICALS (167t:14 T►1C SUFFLIERS 1328.53 TOOLS C67C)15 J. WAYKE SYLVESTER S793.69 PETTY CASTE REIMBURSEMENT F.V. TrC11AS All' CONDITIONING 11 .100.00 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE (67` 17 TOKY•S LCCK 9 SAFE SERVICE LOCKS :(-7']P TI'ANS-ANLRICA OELAVAL. IbC. ti4.G5 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ^.F•7°.19 TRAVEL PUFFS $1.3R1.10 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS C67520 TRUCK P. ALTO SOPFLY. INC. $29975.27 TRUCK PARTS C:f7521 J.6. TUCKER R SONt INC.. $64.11 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0675<11c CITY Of TUSIIN 1.76.4E WATER USEAGE CE 7t.--t UNION OIL C.C. CF CtLiF. 1-16.E1 GASOLINE in7^•..4 UAITED FARCFL SEFVICF. 1'16.90 DELIVERY SERVICE P 6 7 t 2 5 VWA SCIENTIFlf 1.297.02 LAB SUPPLIES Cd (6752(• VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 1.•151.47 PIPE SUPPLIES/WATER IIEATER 9 7 52 7 CARL WARREN E CC. 13. 3 00 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR :f I`:'F. 6AUKES1,A F.AG1P1% SERVICFMTEP A4.79i ENGINE PARTS "F7F14 WFSTEHA WIRI & ALLOYS '177.AP WELDING SUPPLIES Ci•75?J 6FSTINCHOLSC ELLCTFIC COPP F1.743.3E ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ;67531 J.L. WINGERT CO. $160.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �f7E32 ROURKE & 60CDRUFF. INC. 115.970.50 LEGAL SERVICES Of7533 YEPDX CORP. 139377.4P XEROX REPRODUCTION (F7C•'4 Y - TIRE 792.N? TRUCK TIRES ff1575 ELGP6E YARF.LEY ASSOCIATES. 1-2176.41 VALVE SUPPLIES ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS FA10 ?1/25/114 1603.332.15 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL . PROCESSING DATE 1/19/811 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/25/811 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $ 185. 50 #1 ACO FUND 582.00 #2 OPER FUND 6,875.23 N2 ACO FUND 2,480.43 #3 OPER FUND 10,399.54 N3 ACO FUND 3,691 .82 #5 OPER FUND 2,731 .99 N5 ACO FUND 2, 154.00 N6 ACO FUND 188. 10 N7 OPER FUND 4,340.41 H7 ACO FUND 1 , 15i.94 N11 OPER FUND 6, 165.07 911 ACO FUND 551 .21 CJ N13 ACO FUND 41 .68 1 95&6 OPER FUND 2,681 .55 N5&6 ACO FUND 92.00 N6E7 OPER FUND 17.02 JT OPER FUND 219,204.20 CORF 267,618.48 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 1 ,517.50 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 3,344. 11 .IT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 67,318.37 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/25/84 $603.332. 15 .. w 'eos COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING February 15, 1984 - 5:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of February 8, 1984, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Don Smith, Chairman, Richard Edgar, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, Bill Vardoulis, James Wahner DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes OTHERS: Joint Chairman Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Phil Stone, Peer Swan, Art Bruington, Sat Tamarabuchi * * * * * * * * * * * Approving Irvine Business Complex The Deputy Chief Engineer presented a Study submitted by Boyle summary of a report dated February 1, Engineering 1984, prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, examining the sewer system requirements to accommodate proposed development within the Irvine Business Complex. The report outlined the major land use changes that have occurred in this area since preparation and adoption of the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation Districts No. 1, North Half of No. 6, and No. 7 in December, 1982. Mr. Dawes identified some of the intensive new development currently under construction and in the planning stages for the Irvine Business Complex. The engineers report indicates that the proposed developments within the Complex will generate more than 1.4 million gallons a day more wastewater than was originally anticipated in the Master Plan. The report recommends approximately $1.3 million in additional trunk and subtrunk sewer capacity be constructed within the Irvine Business Complex to serve this rapidly developing area. Following a brief discussion among the Directors, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Irvine Business Complex Study submitted by Boyle Engineering Corporation be, and is hereby,. ordered approved. -1- District 7 2/15/84 Receive, file and approve Staff The Deputy Chief Engineer presented a Report re establishment of separate staff report recommending that a special zones and connection fees zone encompassing the Irvine Business Complex be formed and a connection fee established in an amount sufficient to pay for the additional facilities necessary to serve the increased development. Mr. Dawes recommended establishment of a connection fee within this zone (Zone 2) of $180/1,000 square feet of floor area for new construction or expansion of existing structures other than dwelling units. He advised that the majority of development within the complex (approximately 15 million square feet) had already been approved and emphasized the urgency of establishing a new fee in the Complex to finance the required facilities. The fees within Zone 1, the remainder of District 7 outside the boundaries of the Irvine Business Complex, were recommended to remain at their present levels. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated February 9, 1984, re financing of facilities required to serve the expanding Irvine Business Complex, recommending establishment of a special zone (Zone 2) within the District and adoption of a connection fee of $180/1,000 square feet of floor space of new construction or expansion of existing structures in the new zone, be, and is hereby, received, filed and ordered approved. Report of General Counsel re The General Counsel briefed the proposed Ordinance No. 719 Directors regarding the proposed urgency ordinance, and advised that the ordinance, if adopted by the Board, would go into effect immediately upon passage. Mr. Woodruff and the staff indicated that the Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach and the Irvine Ranch Water District, as well as the major developers planning facilities within the Irvine Business Complex, had all been advised of the proposed ordinance. The Chair also recognized Mr. Sat Tamarabuchi representing the Irvine Company, the major landowner/developer in the Complex, who stated that the Irvine Company supported the proposed ordinance. Adoption of Urgency Ordinance Following a general discussion it was No. 719 moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 719, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Amending Ordinance No. 718, Establishing Separate Zones Within the District and Establishing a Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived; whereupon, the Secretary read Ordinance No. 719 by title only. It was then moved, seconded and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Director Don Smith, Chairman, Richard Edgar, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, Bill Vardoulis, James Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: Roger Stanton -2- District 7 2/15/84 That Ordinance No. 719, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Amending Ordinance No. 718, Establishing Separate Zones Within the District and Establishing a Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits, be, and is hereby, adopted. Declaring intent to amend the Following a brief staff report it was Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk moved, seconded and duly carried: Sewer Facilities to serve District No. 1, Northern Half of District That the Board of Directors hereby No. 6 and District No. 7 declares its intent to amend the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve County Sanitation District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7, as follows: (a) The addition of Main Street Relief Subtrunk (A 21-inch relief trunk paralleling the existing subtrunk in Main Street from Von Karman to Jamboree Boulevard) (b) The addition of Campus Relief Subtrunk (A 15-inch relief subtrunk paralleling the existing subtrunk in Campus Drive from Von Karman to Jamboree Boulevard) (c) The addition of Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main (A 21-inch gravity relief trunk and 10-inch force main in Michelson Drive, paralleling the existing subtrunk, from Von Karman to Jamboree Boulevard) Directing staff to prepare prelim- Moved, seconded and duly carried: inary environmental documents re the proposed amendments to the That the staff be, and is hereby, Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk directed to prepare the preliminary Sewer Facilities environmental documents relative to the proposed amendments to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve County Sanitation District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7 for the Campus Relief Subtrunk and Michelson Relief Subtrunk. Receive and file letter from IRWD Moved, seconded and duly carried: requesting dual trunk design re Airport Relief Trunk That the letter from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) requesting dual-track design to provide plans, specifications and bid documents for the Airport Relief Trunk to receive separate bids for a 39-inch sewer to serve District 7 needs and a 60-inch sewer that would provide additional capacity for District 14 (IRWD) needs, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file letter from IRWD The Chair recognized Joint Chairman Holt re IRWD participation in District who briefed the Board on discussions facilities and payment of dual underway with the Irvine Ranch Water design costs District (IRWD) regarding the proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 14. Mr. Holt introduced Mr. Peer Swan and Mr. Art Bruington, President and General Manager respectively of IRWD who submitted a letter from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) approving payment of $20,200 to District No. 7 for the costs of dual design of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer and expressing a willingness to enter into a similar arrangement relative to their possible participation in -3- District 7 ' .J. 2/15/84 design of the Districts' Joint Sanitation Districts' proposed headworks and outfall booster pumping station expansion projects. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that said letter be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the Selection Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: to negotiate an amendment to the agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee be, and is re design of the Airport Relief hereby, authorized to negotiate an Trunk amendment to the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Airport Relief Trunk, providing for a change in the scope of work due to the realignment of said trunk to Von Karman Avenue, which was authorized by the Board at the December 14, 1983 meeting, and to provide dual-track design to include capacity for Irvine Ranch Water District. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:07 p.m. , February 15, 1984. Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California \,lop -4- i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i - MASTER PLAN r FOR JOINT WORKS WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND r DISPOSAL FACILITIES r r r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r 4J OHN CAROL.LO ENGINEERS r PP40ENM AZ , WALNUT CFEEA CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CA • VISAUA,CA TUCSON,AZ i r wow W W rr EXECUTIVE SUMMARY r+ MASTER PLAN FOR IW JOINT WORKS WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS WEI PHOENIX,AZ • WALNUT CREEK,CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CA • VISALIA.CA TUCSON.AZ woo CONTENTS SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 EXISTING SITUATION 4 Reclamation Plant No. 1 6 Treatment Plant No. 2 6 Interplant System 7 ,ai Joint Use Facilities 10 EXISTING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 11 Discharge Requirements 11 `r Analysis of Existing System 11 PROJECTED SITUATION 14 r� Wastewater Flow and Strength 14 Discharge Requirements 17 FACILITY NEEDS 18 `r Reclamation Plant No. 1 19 Immediate Facility Needs 19 Treatment Plant No. 2 22 two Immediate Facility Needs 22 Interplant System 23 Immediate Facility Needs 23 rr Ocean Outfall System 23 Immediate Facility Needs 25 EXPANDED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY 25 Ww KEY FINDINGS 27 ESTIMATED COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION 28 wed WEI u FIGURES 1 Joint Treatment Works Schematic 5 2 Aerial Photograph Reclamation Plant No. 1 8 �+ 3 Aerial Photograph Treatment Plant No. 2 9 4 Analysis of Existing System During 1981-82 12 5 Projected Average Daily Flow to Joint Works 15 6 Projected Average Daily Flow to Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 16 � • V 7 Proposed Facility Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Laid Out for Rectangular Clarifiers 20 8 Proposed Facility Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1 u Laid Out for Circular Clarifiers 21 9 Proposed Facility Additions at Treatment Plant No. 2 24 U 10 Analysis of System Following Recommended Project, 1987-88 26 11 Implementation Schedule for Recommended Projects 30 u TABLES 1 Summary of Overall 5 Year Facility Needs 29 I ' u L� L� u L ii u b.r +�+ SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS This report describes treatment and disposal facility additions that will be needed at the Joint Treatment Works of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) in the next five years. The report has been prepared to update previous planning documents in accordance with the Districts current 601 planning policy. Unlike previous reports that have been prepared, Federal funding is not likely to be available for the projects outlined herein. As a result, it will 'be necessary for the Sanitation Districts to plan for funding projected facility needs from local sources. Recent projects completed by CSDOC have mainly been directed at providing .r more secondary treatment capability for wastewaters which enter the Joint Treatment Works. Although necessary, these projects have directed large sums r+ of capital into facilities that will improve effluent quality but do not increase treatment capacity. In 1981-82, the Joint Treatment Works, which have a combined nominal design treatment capacity of 184 MGD, treated an average daily flow of 221 MGD. In the same year, the system also handled a peak flow in excess of 400 MGD even though the nominal hydraulic design capacity is limited to only 350 MGD. The systems ability to perform adequately under these circumstances is the result of stressing the system beyond normal operating limits, favorable operating conditions and efficient operation and maintenance performed by the w Districts' staff. v Additional primary treatment capacity and hydraulic capabilities will be needed in the next 5 years. Of the estimated $94,800,000 worth of improve- ments needed, approximately $49,300,000 will be necessary for just two items; a new outfall booster pump station at Treatment Plant No. 2 and a new head- works for Reclamation Plant No. 1. Both items are needed to increase the 1 hydraulic capacity in the system, although the Reclamation Plant No. 1 head- works is also needed to increase primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. � ! U Except for certain projects designed to improve energy efficiency, the 5 year program is mainly directed at primary treatment and hydraulic capacity improvements. Recently, successful efforts by the Districts' staff to have . 1 proposed discharge requirements reduced from full secondary treatment has delayed improved treatment needs. At concentrations stipulated in the Districts' "Ocean Waiver," existing improved treatment capabilities may be V adequate for another five years, however, they may be inadequate at the level j of operation anticipated. u u �.r i U U U l � U L.i i V j � 4.1 2 ` , INTRODUCTION' In fiscal year 1981-82, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County low (CSDOC) treated and disposed of an average of 221 million gallons of waste- water each day. This represents an increase of approximately 20 percent over the average daily flow of 185 million gallons per day (MGD) five years ago ,AW (1977-78). The increase is due in part to the acceptance of wastewater flows from the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed (SAWPA) beginning early in 1982, however, the bulk of the increased flow originated from population growth within the 330 square mile service area of the CSDOC. Although the Sanitation Districts have continued an aggressive capital improvement program during the past five years, the nearly $80,000,000 of construction currently in progress has been primarily directed at providing an improved treatment capability rather than expansion. Despite the minimal expansion efforts and increased flows during the past five years , however, the w Districts have been successful in meeting their current discharge requirements with existing facilities. The ability of the existing Joint Treatment Works semi to meet discharge requirements while operating in excess of rated capacity is the result of superior operation and maintenance, decreased sewage strength, an overall decrease in the reliability of the system (encroachment into stand- by capacity) and favorable circumstances such as moderate winter storms. As flows increase and the requirements for discharge become more stringent, the successful performance of the existing Joint Works treatment system will become progressively less likely unless plant expansion occurs. The object of this report is to outline the additional facilities that will be required to handle future flow increases and to meet anticipated future discharge requirements. While facility needs for a period of twenty years into the future have been examined, the main effort was concentrated on 3 u �1 immediate facility needs or those that will be required in the next five years. u' EXISTING SITUATION The Joint Treatment Works are shown schematically in Figure 1 and consist I of Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 located in Huntington Beach, various interplant facilities to transfer flows I � between the two plants and an ocean outfall system. Following completion of :r expansion projects now under construction the rated design capacity of the V Joint Works will be increased from 184 MGD to 208 MGD. Peak influent pumping capabilities will also be increased from the current 376 MGD capacity to a capacity of 421 MGD following completion of the Hydraulic Reliability project 1 at Treatment Plant No. 2. The current rated design capacity considering projects now under con- struction still will not match the current average daily flow of 221 MGD. In V addition, expanded influent pumping capabilities could exceed the capacity of the outfall pumping system by as much as 70 MGD depending on tide condi- tions. Of the two deficiencies, the outfall pumping limitations are of great- est concern. The existing systems ability to absorb deficiencies in treatment capacity is expected to continue in the immediate future because of the amount of secondary capacity now available in the system. However, outfall pumping L system deficiencies cannot be absorbed. Serious difficulties in outfall pumping have only been prevented by favorable operating conditions and moder- ate winter storms. I ' Various components of the Joint Treatment Works, the discharge require- U ments they currently operate under and their current adequacy are discussed below. I ! v 4 Now 84" SANTA ANA F51" NEWHOPE—PLACENTIA RIVER—DISTRICT 2 LDISTRICT 2 48" SANTA ANA—DISTRICT 1 � 42" EUCLID—DISTRICT 2 39" AIRBASE TRUNK- 84" SUNFLOWER— DISTRICT 6 &7 DISTRICTS 1 D VERSI FN _ II TRUC++. I� '� oo o 0 8qe - - 78" DIVERSION CONNECTION Plant No. 10(), 0 11 96" INTERPLANT INTERCEPI — 96" KNOTT INTERCEPTOR DISTRICTS 3&1 1 54" MAGNOLIA—BUSHARD INTERCEPTOR DISTRICTS 2&3 78" MILLER—HOLDER INTERCEPTOR — DISTRICTS 84" NO SCALE cR p�q NT sso/Nr 42" DISTRICTS 5&6 F9pC qNT R O(/ a 0 � FA�C T e I� 8 OU7.1eAl i L &1 1 Plant No. 2 BAST TRUNK SEWER JOINT TREATMENT WORKS DISTRICT 11 SCHEMATIC COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE I JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS %moo RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. An aerial photograph of Reclamation Plant No. 1, is shown in Figure 2. The facility currently treats about 27 percent (60 MGD) of the 221' MGD of wastewater now received at the Joint Works. Although Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a design capacity of 46 MGD, second- ary treatment capabilities at the plant and the encroachment on standby capa- city now allow it to treat up to 60 MGD. Secondary capacity in excess of 46 - MGD has been realized due to changes in operation of certain tributary indus- tries and an active source control program by the Districts. The operational changes and source control has resulted in a reduction of influent wastewater strength. However, based on past history this trend could reverse. The 20 MGD trickling filter plant can now be operated in parallel with the 46 MGD activated sludge plant with a resultant 66 MGD of improved treat- ment capacity. The availability of improved treatment downstream of the original 46 MGD primary treatment facility and operating the primary plant with no standby allows treating more flow at a higher loading rate. If one of the large clarifiers had to be taken out of service at a flow of 60 MGD, loading rates would increase to a level that might affect performance. Hydraulically, Reclamation Plant No. 1 is limited by headworks capacity to a peak flow rate of 100 MGD. This pumping capacity is more than sufficient for a treatment capacity of 46 MGD, but is inadequate for average daily flows of 60 MGD. The hydraulic capacity of the plant should be roughly twice the average treatment capacity based on peak flow rates that have been observed in the past. As wastewater flows increase, additional hydraulic capacity, primary +r treatment capacity and solids handling facilities must be added to handle the increased wastewater flows. MW TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. Figure 3 is an aerial photograph of Treatment Plant No. 2. Treatment Plant No. 2 currently provides primary treatment for 6 an average flow of 161 MGD although its rated design capacity is only 138 MGD. Construction is currently underway for addition of primary clarifiers N ` and 0 (see Figure 3). When this project is complete, the Plant No. 2 primary treatment- design capacity will be increased to 162 MGD. The lower strength wastewater now being treated at the Joint Works has the same effect on solids handling capacity at Treatment Plant No. 2 as it did 6d at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The effect at Plant No. 1 with regard to primary capacity, was the ability to treat greater volumes of flow without additional solids handling capabilities. This is the reason that Clarifiers N and 0 can U be added at Treatment Plant No. 2 without supplementing digester capacity. Digester and dewatering capability at Treatment Plant No. 2 is adequate for the anticipated ultimate treatment capacity of 175 MGD at Treatment Plant No. 2. Partial secondary treatment capabilities will be available at Treatment Plant No. 2 in the very near future. This capability will be provided by the new 75 MGD pure oxygen activated sludge facility now nearing completion. Therefore, Treatment Plant No. 2 can be considered a 162 MGD treatment plant with improved treatment capabilities of 75 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 headworks pumping capabilities limit its peak flow capacity to 276 MGD, however, construction will soon begin on a project to expand peak pumping capabilities to 321 MGD. With observed peak flow rates ; V that approach twice the average flow rate, the expanded capabilities should be sufficient for flows currently handled at Plant No. 2. INTERPLANT SYSTEM. The interplant system consists of the metering and diversion structure, the 78/96-inch influent wastewater diversion system and the 66 and 84-inch interplant effluent lines that carry Reclamation Plant No. V 1 effluent to the outfall system at Treatment Plant No. 2 (see Figure 1). i ' 7 I ' L1 V r `74 � s 44 da q � - WE vu TOGRAPH Sly, - . Y :3 �alb►�•'.\ � ♦�f1'd• a��'.�1•��'�q• �♦ � r � ' �� - { `• !� dli PMHAOY 14. 1 G SETy _ A ' • • _ � � ..� - �.: i�+gip' -✓ c � a N. 0 � 1 R7 ..�•...�--r--<r -- '-�• Saar yv� �a:..-..�,...� -_ -- - Iv n r - L- � v I - :1. -- -__. �•� ..r: V . �- �- � _ A`J �15. �0�� per• S `V :.. {cb PHOTOGRAPHED .w MAY 72. 1992 • • I' • j i it AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH TREATMENT PLANT No. 2 FIGURE 3 rr Wastewater flows tributary to the metering and diversion structure (located at Reclamation Plant No. 1) are metered as they enter and are either discharged to Reclamation Plant No. 1 or diverted to Treatment Plant No. 2. VIE? The capacities of the six interceptors that currently enter the metering and diversion structure total 391 MGD, however, all of the interceptors do not y+ normally operate at their maximum capacities. Discharges to Reclamation Plant No. 1 are limited to the capacity of the Plant No. 1 headworks (100 MGD) and old diversions to Plant No. 2 are limited to the surcharged capacity of 110 MGD that is available in the 78/96-inch interplant diversions system. Flows W tributary to the metering and diversion structure are therefore limited by tow downstream restrictions to 210 MGD. - The combined capacity of the 66 and 84-inch interplant effluent lines that parallel the Santa Ana River is 174 MGD. The full capacity of these two lines is not currently needed due to the limited headworks capacity of 100 MGD 'ter at Reclamation Plant No. 1. low JOINT USE FACILITIES. Joint use facilities include facilities that are shared in common by both treatment plants in the CSDOC system. The major low facility in this category is the ocean outfall system. The existing ocean outfall system consists of two outfalls and two out- fall booster pump stations. Both pump stations currently pump to the 120-inch outfall which is the District 's main discharge point. The 78-inch outfall has not been used since the 120-inch outfall was put in service and it is pres- ently intended for use during emergency situations. - The outfall system capacity is related to the condition of the outfall `r pipeline and the ocean tide level at the time of discharge. If pumping capa- city were available, and the 120-inch outfall was in reasonable condition with regard to pipe roughness, it could discharge approximately 420 MGD at high _ 10 tide and the current surge tower height. However, current outfall booster pumping capability is not adequate to fully utilize this capacity. OutfalI system capacity is currently limited to 350 MGD at high tide and a Manning's I ' pipe roughness coefficient of 0.015 with current booster pumping ca'pabil - y ities. During more favorable tide conditions , the outfall booster pumping i capability is greater, but probably does not exceed about 430 MGD with the current surge tower elevation of 68.9 feet and the types of pumps that are in place. EXISTING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The existing system and the most recent conditions it has operated under are examined in this section. DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. The Regional Water Quality Control Board 's Order No. 81-26 establishes the NPDES permit under which the District currently operate. In short, the order sets discharge requirements for average flows up I ' to 227 MGD which call for effluent biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and sus- pended solids (SS) concentrations of 160 mg/1 and 125 mg/1 respectively. These limits are being met with the existing system. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SYSTEM. A schematic of the Joint Treatment Works and the 1981-82 flows that were handled by the system (221 MGD) are shown in Figure 4. The rated capacities of the two treatment plants and associated facilities are representative of facilities that were in place in 1981-82. In 1 1981-82, the existing system was handling more flow than the rated design capacity. The total average daily flow entering the system exceeded design capacity by approximately 37 MGD. Despite these high flows, the Districts have been successful in meeting their current discharge requirements. This is possible 11 I t I N DIVERSION /00 STRUCTURE 60 100 RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 INTERPLANT 40 EFFLUENT LINES 60 TREATMENT CAPACITY I20., 46 MGD CAPACITY-174 MGD 22� HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 100 MGD OUTFALL 780' in tn* - ° SYSTEM in 0 M CAPACITY-350MGD INTERPLANT DIVERSION SYSTEM CAPACITY- 110 MG4 TREATMENT 106-� 161 PLANT NO. 2 Z:l:9:5* 3OO TREATMENT CAPACITY 138 MGD HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 2T6 MGD 00 PEAK FLOW - MGD , MARCH 1982 AVERAGE FLOW - MGD, FISCAL YEAR 1981 - 82 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SYSTEM * ESTIMATED FLOW DURING 1.981 -82 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 4 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS because of the current discharge limits that are now in effect, and the extent of the secondary capacity that is now available at Reclamation Plant No. 1. y With existing facilities, the Districts had the ability to produce effluent of secondary quality to about 27 percent of total 1981-82 flows. i In March 1982, peak wet weather flows exceeded rated influent pumping capacity and the rated design capacity of the outfall booster pump station by 24 and 50 MGD respectively (see Figure 4). The ability of the system to handle peak flows in excess of its design capacity is the result of stressing the system beyond normal limits, and favorable operating conditions. The ability to pump 300 MGD into Treatment Plant No. 2 results from the use of a pump designated as "standby" at the headworks. Had both standby pumps been down for repairs, as one was, peak influent pumping capabilities would have i � been restricted. '•� Also, total system flows peaked at 400 MGD in March, 1982 during average �J tide conditions; the lower tides provide greater capacity in the outfall system. Had flows peaked in December or January as they have in the past, higher tide conditions would have made disposal efforts more difficult. ti During March, 1983, flows well beyond 400 MGD were experienced. Most of the peak was stored in the sewer system, however, overflows were observed in } the systems lower reaches. At current average daily flows, the current maximum flow expected for the system is 434 MGD. V Expansion projects are now underway at Treatment Plant No. 2 that will relieve the deficiencies at that facility. The two projects will increase i•.' treatment capacity to 162 MGD and influent pumping capacity to 321 MGD. The - Ls additional influent pumping capability will allow the introduction of approxi - mately 421 MGD into the CSDOC system while disposal capacity will be limited to only 350 MGD during high tides. I 13 In accordance with the above discussion, it is apparent that the current system is short on treatment and disposal capacity at today's flow rates. As flow rates increase, these deficiencies will become more acute since standby �+ capacity is already being utilized to operate the system beyond its rated -- capacity. NOW PROJECTED SITUATION In the near future, the existing Joint Treatment Works will need to be expanded. Additional facilities will be needed to improve reliability, keep pace with anticipated flow increases and to meet more stringent discharge requirements. WASTEWATER FLOW AND STRENGTH. In the future, it is expected that flows will increase and discharge requirements will probably become more severe. Anticipated future flow increases to the overall Joint Works system are r depicted in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5, by the year 2002-03 average daily r+ flows to the Joint Treatment Works are expected to reach 307 MGD with poten- tial peak wet weather flows approaching 597 MGD. The expected distribution of these flows between the District 's two treatment plants is shown in Figure 6. As shown, current planning calls for Treatment Plant No 2 to be expanded to its ultimate capacity of 175 MGD before expanding Reclamation Plant No. 1. At its ultimate capacity, Treatment Plant No. 2 will be designed to handle peak flows of 350 MGD, however, until a new Plant No. 1 headworks is constructed Plant No. 2 peak flows could exceed this limit (the new Plant No. 1 headworks is estimated to take at least four years told to design and construct. During this period, peak flows beyond 100 MGD that would normally be handled by Plant No. 1 will need to be diverted to Plant No. I 2). v ,� 14 I V 400 RECORDED FLOW PROJECTED FLOW 350 I � 2 5 0 /// o .J U. 200 150 4 100 (� �• �. eo eo o ao m m A A o 0 A A A O O p A m A co O O i N N FISCAL YEAR L PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW 1 � TO JOINT WORKS. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 5 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS tow y RECORDED FLOW +� 300 /Ar///I PROJECTED FLOW 250 r 0 200 PLANT No. 2 0 175 MGD Z 150 rr 100 //U. � / �// PLANT No. 1 50 ar 0 �tD m o r a 0 o r w 0 o r r, N co co 0 co o o o m 0 0 0 CD GD cl) CD CD CD 0) W ao 0 0 N C4 FISCAL YEAR PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW TO PLANT No. 1 AND PLANT No. 2 ,.,+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 6 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS L I Flow increases that are scheduled to be handled at Reclamation Plant No. 1 are also shown on Figure 6. Current forecasts of future tributary flows ! indicate that Reclamation Plant No. 1 will be treating 95 MGD within 5 years (1987-88) with associated peak flows approaching 177 MGD. By 2002-03, the � I irk plant could be treating as much as 132 MGD requiring hydraulic capacity for peak flows approaching 247 MGD. The quality of wastewater tributary to the Joint Works is not expected to I j.r change substantially in the foreseeable future. The Districts current source control program seems effective in stabilizing increases in both organic and L trace element constituents that may place an added burden on the system. The one exception would be slight increases in influent BOD concentrations that could result from flow contributions from SAWPA. t.r DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. In 1972 Congress passed the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500) requiring all municipally owned treatment works to provide second- ary treatment by 1977. However, this legislation was amended in 1977 to allow ocean dischargers to seek variances from this requirement. At the time of 6w this writing, public comment is being solicited on a CSDOC proposal to provide y L� partial secondary treatment resulting in effluent BOD and SS concentrations of 100 and 95 mg/1 respectively. The proposal , commonly called the "Ocean Waiver," was given tentative approval by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in November 1981. Although the waiver allows lesser degrees of treat- ment than were ultimately envisioned, the discharge requirements are more j severe than those currently in effect. The "Ocean Waiver" will be in effect for a period of five years. At the expiration of the five year permit period of the waiver, an environmental assessment must be performed by the RWQCB to establish future requirements. 6.1 I ' 17 —' FACILITY NEEDS Total average flow entering the Joint Treatment Works could reach 307 MGD by fiscal year 2002-03 with associated peak wet weather flows approaching 597 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 will have reached its ultimate design .capacity of low _ 175 MGD and Reclamation Plant No. 1 could be treating as much as 132 MGD of %Eli flow. Clearly, a substantially expanded treatment and hydraulic capability - will be needed to serve the estimated future population of CSDOC. The additional facilities needed at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Treatment Plant No. 2, the Interplant System and the Ocean Outfall System are discussed below. While twenty year needs are presented, the emphasis is placed on immediate facility needs or those that should be constructed in the next five — years. The five year facility needs described below will not necessarily meet r design criteria which has historically been used, however, they will be a major step in this direction. Uncertainties in predicting future population growth rates and in predicting future discharge requirements make the planning of future facilities very difficult. The approach used here, has been to develop a limited 5 year program for capital improvements. This program is .,� primarily directed at improving hydraulic reliability in the system. Addi - tional improved treatment facilities that may be necessary have been postponed in anticipation of a better definition of future discharge requirements and further evaluation of new treatment processes. The risk associated with this delay is possible degradation of effluent quality toward the latter part of the first five years in the study period if flows increase at currently pre- dicted rates. The overall system should therefore be reevaluated in four to five years with more current information on actual treatment efficiencies, flow increases and future discharge requirements. Due to the construction WEI time that is necessary to add major facilities, the timeliness of reevaluating ,.r the system cannot be overemphasized. ,.,� 18 L.' RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. Reclamation Plant No. 1 is currently limited in hydraulic and primary treatment capabilities. Within the next twenty years, an .additional 86 MGD of primary treatment capacity will be needed to treat +�•� projected flows approaching 132 MGD. If discharge requirements do not become more severe than those in the "Ocean Waiver" and if more innovative improved treatment techniques are not developed, an additional 38 MGD of improved L treatment capacity could be needed in the year 2002-03. A layout of the ti facilities needed in 2002-03 using rectangular primary sedimentation basins is shown on the aerial photograph in Figure 7. An alternate layout using circular sedimentation basins is shown is Figure 8. A decision on the type of sedimentation basins to be used is being deferred until additional operating information is available from the recently remodeled rectangular clarifiers A, I � B and C at Treatment Plant No. 2. y.f Immediate Facility Needs. There is currently an excess of secondary (improved) treatment capacity at Plant No. 1, however, within five years (1987-88), these facilities will be stressed to meet discharge requirements in � I the "Ocean Waiver. " Additional improved treatment capability is not included 4� � r in the recommended facility additions for the next five years at this time because of the Districts ongoing research of more appropriate improved treat- ment techniques and the possibility of revised discharge requirements. The L Districts are currently examining alternative processes such as advanced primary treatment, primary effluent filtration, attached growth biological systems and the activated carbon treatment system. The demonstrated feasi - bility of any one of these systems could have a pronounced affect on future improved treatment needs. By 1987-88, average daily flow rates reaching Reclamation Plant No. 1 are expected to be approaching 95 MGD with possible peak flows of approximately !.t I ` 19 I � { 4 • � •- ��' •'mil '�" -:+i:_ r� LEGEND z 5-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS `\ 20-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS t ti ,•�_:.,',i I THICKENERS ^; _ �I 1 - �� SECONDARY CLARIFIERS 7T�7•TTTTT SCE toil SUBSTATION ' AREA FOR ADDITIONAL FUTURE DIGESTERS +r'_ z � • \ •,•• } A REA FOR ADDITIONAL FUTURE 4 •�' w w"PRIMARY CLARIFIERS -; •ilte!}l R _ � 4�w IEA FOR FUTURE IMPROVED4 TRE ATM ENT ` t n � •� o`,_Joo no 1 Irp _ .1 •.v.. fa.r.r..rr..r �. PHOTOGRAPHED 1 MAY 14. 1982 TREET PROPOSED FACILITY ADDITIONS AT RECLAMATION PLANT No. 1 LAID OUT FOR RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS FIGURE 7 mp I• _ • ��' •� .•..ml. F,101.man c .�►'. _ :e -- Y - � -- - - -- - - -- - LEGEND 5-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS 20-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS D ORAGE , R - THICKENERS SECONDARY CLARIFIERS - - 'lT'1TTTTTT�T _ SUBSTATION AREA FOR ADDI IONA - - - FUTURE DIGESTERS - w z ti• �+ AREA FOR ADDITIONAL FUTURE i PRIMARY CLARIFIER i S ^� 1L l i < ' AREA FOR FU IMPROVED TREATMENT. a � PHOTOGRAPHED MAY 14. 1082 -- STREET y+_ PROPOSED FACILITY ADDITIONS AT RECLAMATION PLANT No. 1 LAID OUT FOR CIRCULAR CLARIFIERS FIGURE 8 177 MGD. As a minimum, a new Plant No. 1 headworks, and additional primary clarification and digestion capacity will be needed to meet these projected flows. A new 200 MGD headworks is proposed with an initial pumping capability of 80 MGD. The new headworks would feed an additional 24 MGD of primary clarification capacity and two new 110 foot diameter digesters would be added. Additional facilities will also be needed to provide support services for the expanded treatment capability. Specific additions that will be needed for the new headworks and primary treatment system include: v • An expanded digester gas utilization system to provide fuel for the new headworks pumps; ,.r • An expanded standby electrical capability to insure operation of the - new and existing headworks during power interruptions ; • A new prechlorination facility to provide odor control capabilities at the new headworks; and • A new plant water system to meet increased plant water demands that will result from the expansion. A new boiler facility and additional energy recovery systems will also be `+ needed to provide heat for the new digesters. In addition, aeration effi- ciency improvements at the activated sludge plant will help to conserve energy. A layout of major facilities in the recommended five year improvement program is shown on the aerial photographs in Figures 7 and 8. TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. The expansion recommendations at Reclamation �..r Plant No. 1 are needed to supplement the ultimate capacity of Treatment Plant No. 2. Therefore, prior to 1987-88, Treatment Plant No. 2 will have reached the planned capacity of 175 MGD. Immediate Facility Needs. The facilities needed at Treatment Plant No. 2 to reach its ultimate planned capacity include: primary sedimentation basin N v 22 i V and 0 now under construction; the Treatment Plant No. 2 hydraulic reliability I project (P2-25-2) now nearing the start of construction ; two additional primary sedimentation basins (P & Q) ; and the replacement of two pumps in headworks C. Odor control improvements are also needed. L Following completion of these facilities, Treatment Plant No. 2 will have a primary treatment capacity of 175 MGD with capabilities to provide secondary treatment to 75 MGD of the total flow. As with Reclamation Plant No. 1, this f secondary treatment capability could be stressed perhaps up to 90 MGD to meet L "Ocean Waiver" effluent requirements in 1987-88 if they are still in effect. Peak influent pumping capability following full expansion of Treatment Plant No. 2 will be 350 MGD. A layout of major Plant No. 2 facilities that L are being recommended are shown on the aerial photograph of Treatment Plant No. 2 in Figure 9. 11 V INTERPLANT SYSTEM. In twenty years, when peak flows leaving Reclamation Plant No. 1 are approaching 247 MGD, an additional 73 MGD of capacity will be needed to supplement the existing 174 MGD interplant effluent system. The additional capacity would be provided for with a third interplant line paral - leling the existing 66 and 84 lines along the Santa Ana River. The line would be sized to provide disposal capacity that would match total headworks capa- city or to carry approximately 126 MGD of Reclamation Plant No. 1 effluent. U An 84 to 96-inch line would be needed. L Immediate Facility Needs. The 177 MGD peak flow expected at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in 1987-88 will fully utilize the current interplant effluent V system capacity of 174 MGD; therefore, it is recommended that expansions to the interplant system begin by that date. OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM. Current estimates of the ultimate flow requiring disposal through the ocean outfall system require that a disposal capacity of 23 �.1 on Ilk lulllow '2 r• � ♦, � �/`/ .may r .- � ■ � All . a ,� /,mo 44 t LEGEND 5-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS ■ i t [In • �[� +�[ [I Tl?1T1 V i , %: �vt co ,P Goy 0 p 6C 200 PHOTOGRAPHED MAY 12,1984 PROPOSED FACILITY ADDITIONS AT TREATMENT PLANT No . 2 FIGURE 9 625 MGD be available. A disposal capacity of 480 MGD is available in the 120- inch outfall if booster pumping capability is supplemented. The additional WW 145 MGD of capacity needed could be furnished by the 78-inch outfall . The current capacity of the 78-inch outfall is 230 MGD, however, if the outfall is .. extended by 7,200 feet to discharge at a depth of 120 feet, its capacity will be reduced to 160 MGD. After a new outfall booster pump station for the 120- inch outfall is complete, the existing Foster pump station would be modified for use with the 78-inch outfall . Immediate Facility Needs. Current deficiencies in disposal capacity can %not be eliminated by constructing a new outfall booster pump station for use with the 120-inch outfall . The new pump station would have a capacity of 480 MGD tikw plus standby to match the ultimate capacity of the outfall . In 1987-88, when peak flows to the outfall could be as high as 527 MGD, _ approximately 60 MGD would be pumped through the 78-inch outfall . This could be accomplished by using the Foster pump station for booster pumping capabil - ities. .. Modifications to the Foster pump station and extension of the 78-inch outfall have not been considered in the first five year improvements however, planning for these facilities should be started toward the end of the five 4.4 year period. The tentative location of the new outfall booster pump station is shown on Figure 9. The final location will be determined in final design. 1.r EXPANDED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY In 1987-88, the 5 year improvement program will have put the Districts in a position to handle potential peak flows although discharge requirements will be more difficult to meet than they are today because of the increased ~ flows. As shown in Figure 10, projected peak flows just about equal the 25 loot Em DIVERSION STRUCTURE ss DEC> RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 INTERPLANT 52 TREATMENT CAPACITY EFFLUENT LINES ` �p 95 70 MGD CAPACITY- 174 MGD 270 0 HYDRAULIC CAPACITY ISO MGD OUTFALL 78 SYSTEM � N �N M CAPACITY-710 MGD INTERPLANT DIVERSION SYSTEM CAPACITY - 110 MGD TREATMENT 112---� 175 PLANT NO. 2 224 353 TREATMENT CAPACITY 1T5 MGD HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 351 MGD 000 PEAK FLOW - MGD 0 AVERAGE FLOW - MGD ANALYSIS OF SYSTEM FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED PROJECT, 1987 -88 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 10 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS hydraulic capabilities of the 'system, however, average flows exceed rated treatment capacity by 25 MGD. The deficiency in rated treatment capacity will be at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The rated design capacity of the primary plant will be 70 MGD although it may be treating approximately 95 MGD. This is .r comparable to todays use of a 46 MGD facility to treat 60 MGD. ,,, An estimate of the improved treatment capacity necessary at Reclamation Plant No. 1 to meet ocean waiver discharge requirements, assuming that the `i pure oxygen plant at Treatment Plant No. 2 can be stressed to 90 MGD, is 79 MGD. To provide this level of improved treatment capacity, the existing 46 tow MGD activated sludge plant will need to be operated at 59 MGD with the VIEW trickling filter plant treating 20 MGD. Consistent performance of the facil - ity at this flow rate will be difficult to achieve. •� The result of the five year capital improvement program will therefore be - an increase in the system's hydraulic reliability, although improved treatment facilities will be stressed to consistently meet discharge requirements. .r KEY FINDINGS ,� The existing Joint Treatment Works considering projects now under con- struction is capable of treating present average daily flows of 221 MGD if some built in standby capacity is utilized. However, the systems ability to handle peak wet weather flows is limited. While observed flows to date have WWI not created problems, the potential is present for peak wet weather flows to timid exceed the hydraulic capabilities of the existing system. As tributary flows increase, the risks associated with these deficiencies will increase. The program required to correct the deficiencies involves several very major facilities. The new outfall booster pump station and the new Reclama- Wild tion Plant No. 1 headworks will utilize more than half of the total estimated w 27 7 6.d project costs for the five year program. Both facilities will take about four V years to design and construct. If flows increase at currently predicted rates, potential peak flows could exceed the current systems optimum hydraulic capacity by as much as 70 MGD before the new facilities are in operation. The scope of the improvement program proposed herein is minimal and may 1 � stress treatment reliability, however, hydraulic reliability is greatly V improved. if discharge requirements remain at the levels contained in the Ocean Waiver" and flows continue to increase at predicted rates, additional facilities will need to be planned while the recommended project is being constructed. Major facilities related to Reclamation Plant No. 1 may be L needed soon after the initial five year program is complete include: a new y� interplant effluent line; additional primary clarification capacity; addi - tional secondary clarification and solids handling capabilities ; and addi - tional improved treatment capabilities. ESTIMATED COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION L The estimated cost of the various facilities contained in the 5 year improvement program are summarized in Table 1. Of the estimated $94,800,000 6� in total project costs, nearly half ($48,900,000) will be for Reclamation ) + Plant No. 1 improvements. The new outfall booster V p pump station will be the second largest expenditure at an estimated $32,000,000. Total estimated 1 ' W' project costs to expand Treatment Plant No. 2 to its ultimate capacity of 175 MGD are $13,700,000 including proposed odor control facilities. The above costs are in today's dollars (December 1982 @ ENRLA of 4750). A recommended implementation schedule for the five year facility needs is shown on Figure 11. The various facilities were prioritized on the following si U basis. 28 r TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF OVERALL 5 YEAR FACILITY NEEDS Additional Facilities Estimated Project Costa RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS New Headworks Facility $17,300,000 Primary Clarifiers 4,800,000 Digesters 7,900,000 Plant Water Pump Station 2,000,000 Electrical Reliability 2,400,000 Subtotal .,34,400,000 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS Aeration Efficiency Improvements $ 5,800,000 Heat Recovery Projects 1,300,000 MW Mixing Equipment 600,000 Low Pressure Gas Storage 300,000 High Pressure Gas Compressor 800,000 Boiler Facility 200,000 Prechlorination Facilities 3,600,000 Cogeneration Facility 11900,000 Subtotal $14,500,000 Plant No. 1 Total $48,900,000 TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS Project No. P2-25-2 $ 5,000,000 Headworks C Pumps 600,000 Circular Primary Clarifiers (P&Q) 4,700,000 Subtotal $10,300,000 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS Sewer Gas Scrubber $ 800,000 Odor Control Facilities 2,600,000 ,r Subtotal 3,400,000 Plant No. 2 Total $13,700,000 JOINT FACILITIES BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS Outfall Booster Pump Station & Surge Tower Extension $32,100,000 WW Flap Gates for Discharge 003 100,000 Joint Facilities Total $32,200,00-9 WW GRAND TOTAL $94,800,000 a All cost data adjusted to an ENRLA construction cost index of 4750. 29 1i FISCAL YEAR 6a� PROJECT 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 { 601 SEGMENT No. I i � Project No. P2-25-2 Headworks C New Outfall Booster Pump Station New Plant No. 1 Headworks j Clarifiers P and Q - Plant No. 2 Primary Clarifiers - Plant No. 1 Plant No. 2 Odor Control Facilities � f Digesters No. 11 and 12 - Plant No. 1 Flap Gates for Discharge - 003 SEGMENT No.2 Electrical Reliability - Plant No. 1 im I { I. Heat Recovery - Plant No. 1 Mixing Equipment - Plant No. 1 High Pressure Gas Compressor - Plant No. 1 Plant Water Pump Station - Plant No. 1 LL i SEGMENT No. 3 Plant No. 2 Headworks Modifications 1 + (2-48 MGD Pumps) V Prechlorination Facility - Plant No. 1 Boiler Facility - Plant No. 1 � f Plant No. 1 Aeration Efficiency Ind Improvements Low Pressure Gas Storage - Plant No. 1 Plant No. 1 Cogeneration Facility 11 LEGEND: ® DESIGN 0 BID CONSTRUCTION (Arrow is Midpoint) IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 6i4 FOR RECOMMENDED PROJEC fS I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE II I JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS r Facilities that will allow greater volumes of wastewater to enter and leave the District 's treatment works have been given first consideration. These facilities include the new Plant No. 1 headworks, the Plant No. 2 r hydraulic reliability project and a new outfall booster pump station and surge tower extension. r+ In accordance with current planning, Treatment Plant No. 2 should be expanded to its ultimate capacity prior to expanding Reclamation Plant No. rr 1. This can be accomplished through the addition of sedimentation basins P and Q. r Other Reclamation Plant No. 1 facilities such as sedimentation basins, and digesters can be phased to coincide with the completion of the new headworks facility. Since most of these facilities require less design and ""' construction time (see Figure 11), their implementation can be delayed until the headworks project is well underway. Remaining Plant No. 1 facilities have been scheduled in relation to their r importance. Projects related to energy recovery and electrical reliability are given a high priority. Other projects are scheduled in Figure 11 toward r the latter part of the five year period because of their lesser relative significance compared to other recommended facilities. r imd 31 wr 41-0 slzl8y DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE MASTER PLAN REPORT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 SCH #83122808 Prepared for: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County February 1984 Prepared by: Envirosphere Company 3000 West MacArthur Boulevard Santa Ana, California 92704 Contact: H. S. Schneider (714) 662-4047 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 March 1, 1984 (714)962-2411 STAFF REPORT SUMMARY OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE MASTER PLAN REPORT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT NO. 6 The agenda for the March 14 meeting includes an item to receive and file the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for County Sanitation District No. 5 and South Half of District No. 6 and to set it for public hearing . The report was prepared by Envirosphere Company to study the possible environmental effects of rehabilitation and construction projects set forth in the recently adopted Master Plan . A Notice of Preparation was mailed to seventy potentially affected agencies and a Nonstatutory Advisement letter was sent to 84 homeowner associations in the project area inviting them to let the Districts know of their concerns prior to preparation of the report. The study area encompasses all of District No. 5 and the south half of District No . 6 . Following is a staff summary of the enclosed Draft Environmental Impact Report: Each potential environmental, social and economic effect iden- tified has been evaluated in the EIR. Short term unavoidable adverse impacts include: 1 . Air quality impacts from fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions . 2 . Short-term landform alterations during construction . 3 . Temporary disturbance to biological resources during construction . 4 . Local ambient noise levels will be increased during construction activities . 5 . Traffic patterns will be disrupted . 6 . Some visual impacts will occur during construction . 1 Long term impacts identified are both adverse and beneficial . The only long term adverse impact , is the standard permanent commit- ment of land easements for the maintenance of the facilities after installation . Beneficial impacts include improving the reliability of the sewerage facilities through rehabilitation of deteriorating trunk lines , long term air quality and energy benefits with the use of new and modernized pumping facilities and a significant reduction of seawater infiltration/inflow which correspondingly reduces the volume of wastewater needing pumping and treatment . Notable impacts and the mitigation measures suggested are: 1 . Potential runoff from excavation into adjacent waterways or storm drains . Mitigation measures include basing construction on detailed soils and geologic studies , removal of excess soils excavated during construction and replacement of vegetation within a short period of time . 2 . Potentially significant impacts on biological resources are present for the Coast Trunk rehabilitation between the Santa Ana River and 62nd Street, the modifications to the Bay Bridge pump station in the Newport Bay area, and from installation of new gravity sewers and force main in the south coast areas of Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove . These include erosion from construction activities affecting benthic organisms in the estuarine channel, the salt marsh wetland, or Newport Bay, compaction along the pipeline corridor retarding the growth of revegetation , elimination of wildlife habi- tat, disruption of wildlife due to increased noise and construction activities , and potential disruption of an endangered plant species . These impacts can be mitigated by employing adequate procedures to prevent spills , using native species which establish themselves rapidly to provide protective cover , confining construc- tion equipment to existing roadways when possible, avoiding nesting seasons for bird species and verification and protection if possible of the endangered vegetation . 3 . There are no known cultural impacts in District No . 6, however, there are potential impacts to five archaeological sites within District No . 5 . A record search on the five sites was conducted during preparation of this EIR. When the precise alignments for the projects are established, either a field check will be performed or the Districts will notify a qualified archaeologist in the event artifacts are discovered during construction . 2 9 4 . Impacts to existing land uses will occur during construction . These include noise, traffic, vegetation, business access and poten- tial park usage . Since the Districts are a single purpose agency, the proposed facilities will not induce future growth but rather will accommodate the planning and zoning approved by the affected cities and County. The Districts will closely coordinate on each project with other affected agencies . Strong efforts will be made to maintain commercial and parking area access during construction activities . The Districts will be required to obtain Coastal Commission permits for some projects . City, County and CalTrans traffic control plans will be utilized during construction . The report details existing conditions, impacts and mitigation measures as they relate to the various projects . The facilities are necessary to prevent further deterioration of the baseline sewer system and to correct anticipated capacity deficiencies based on the Cities ' and County' s updated land use plans . The impacts are growth accommodating , not growth inducing . IF ANY DIRECTOR HAS A QUESTION PLEASE CALL TOM DAWES OR HILARY BAKER, 540-2910 3 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE MASTER PLAN REPORT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 � AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 too ew SCH #83122808 tw tM, Prepared for: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County February 1984 Prepared by: Envirosphere Company 3000 West MacArthur Boulevard Santa Ana, California 92704 Contact: H. S. Schneider (714) 662-4047 tw TABLE OF CONTENTS emw mw Section Paqe (3w TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF FIGURES iii M, LIST OF TABLES iii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY iv I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION I-1 " A. Project Background I-1 B. Location I-1 C. Description of Project I-1 D. Schedule I-4 E. Intended Uses of the EIR T--4 II. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, IMPACTS II-1 AND MITIGATION MEASURES A. Topography, Soils and Geology II-1 B. Hydrology and Water Quality II-4 C. Biological Resources II-7 D. Air Quality II-14 E. Cultural Resources II-16 F. Land Use/Relevant Plans II-19 G. Traffic and Circulation II-27 H. Noise II-38 I. Visual Resources II-39 J. Utilities II-41 K. Cost/Revenue Analysis II-44 III. ALTERNATIVES III-1 A. No Project Alternative III-1 taw i i Ird TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page IV. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF THE IV-1 �•+ ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITYy V. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE V-1 INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION VI. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION VI-1 `d VII. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS VII-1 VIII. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT VIII-1 IX. ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED IX-1 X. BIBLIOGRAPHY X-1 APPENDIX A - NOTICE OF PREPARATION, INITIAL STUDY AND RESPONSES APPENDIX B - ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORT i APPENDIX C - TRAFFIC REPORT 41 W Yw 11 �+ LIST OF FIGURES Following Figure Number Title Page too I-1 County Sanitation Districts I-1 I-2 Study Area I-1 old II-1 Regional Seismicity II-2 II-2 Land Use Map II-19 II-3 Existing Traffic Conditions II-28 II-4 Existing Traffic Conditions II-28 II-5 Noise Ranges: Construction Equipment II-39 tow LIST OF TABLES tmb Following Table Number Title Page II-1 Air Quality Data: Costa Mesa and Los II-14 Alamitos, 1978-1981 II-2 Daily Roadway Capacity Estimates II-29 II-3 Preliminary Construction Costs and Proposed II-47 Schedule for Recommended Facilities II-4 Preliminary Construction Costs and Proposed II-47 Schedule for Recommended Facilities Necessitated By South Coast Development m iii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared as an informational document to inform agency decisionmakers and the general public of the significant environmental effects of a project, to identify possible means to minimize the significant effects and present reasonable alternatives to the project. In conformance with CEQA, this draft EIR has been prepared to review and assess the impacts associated with the proposed improvements, including rehabilitation and construction of sewage collection facilities in District 5 and the south half of District 6 of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) . The environmental analysis contained in this document addresses the primary objectives of assessing the individual and collective environ- �, mental impacts and issues of the proposed project in accordance with CEQA and the CSDOC EIR guidelines.' bw On October 12, 1983 the Boards of Directors of Districts 5 and 6 adopted Resolution No. 83-165 approving an agreement with Envirosphere Company `=' for preparation of this Environmental Impact Report for hourly rates and outside services not to exceed $9,440. B. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS tmd A summary of the anticipated impacts and applicable mitigation measures law for the proposed project has been prepared as shown on the following table. Section I of this EIR provides a complete description of the proposed project and a comprehensive discussion of impacts and mitigation measures is included in Section II of this EIR. iv COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES Topography, Soils and Geology Temporary landform alterations related o Construction activities will comply to construction activities. with local jurisdiction ordinances. Erosion potential is increased during o Suitable techniques to minimize construction period. erosion will be employed. Sewage collection facilities may be o Construction in sensitive geologic affected by potential geologic hazards areas will be based on detailed including seismic events, liquifaction, geotechnical study. differential settling, etc. Hydrology and Water Quality Open trenches will be subject to ground- o Dewatering control measures to be water infiltration and collection of surface employed will be in compliance with water runoff during construction activities. NPDES permit. Improved sewer facilties will still be o Rehabilitation of system components subject to potential spill occurrences. itself is a major mitigation. o Spill events will be responded to rapidly under CSDOC's contingency plans and standby maintenance personnel. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES Biological Resources Impacts to biological resources will be o None required. insignificant in areas along or within existing roadways. Rehabilitation activities in the o Coordination with the California estuarine area near the Santa Ana River Department of Fish and Game during could potentially disturb the plant rehabilitation and revegetation of species, Salt Marsh Bird's Beak and disturbed areas will substantially habitat of nesting bird species. reduce potential impacts to insignificant levels. o Rehabilitation project from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Santa Ana River provides additional reliability and is a mitigation against a possible sewage spill. o Consider alternative alignment for sewer lines corresponding to site development plan. Air Quality Short-term emissions of fugitive dust o Construction related dust will be and pollutants from construction controlled by appropriate equipment will occur during construction techniques (wetting). activities. o None required. Modernization of pump stations will result in energy savings and decrease in air emissions. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES Cultural Resources Sewer construction could cause potential o During project design, impacts to impacts to archeological resources in exact site locations and assessments District 5. of significance will be made and mitigation programs will be formulated and implemented. Land Use/Relevant Plans Parking or access to commercial and o Coordination to maintain access residential areas may be disrupted or during construction will be conducted blocked temporarily during construction. to the extent feasible. Temporary disruption to park and open o Scheduling of construction activities space lands may occur during construction. will be coordinated with appropriate agencies to the extent feasible. SCAG-82 Growth Forecast Policy County of Orange Planning Commission o None required. Air Quality Management Plan Rehabilitation and construction of sewage collection facilities will not induce growth but will accommodate planned growth in District 5 and the south half of District 6. California Coastal Act of 1976 o Sewer improvements may require a Coastal Development Permit. Santa Ana RWQCB o Discharges into surface water will be in compliance with CSDOC's NPDES Dewatering Permit. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES Traffic and Circulation Significant short-term impacts in terms o Potential techniques to reduce of traffic congestion and changes to traffic volume impacts include present patterns of circulation could tunneling under busy intersections, result during construction, particularly restricted hours of construction, and if no traffic mitigation measures are construction within the median area. implemented. Traffic control will be coordinated with the affected cities and County. Improper traffic control techniques and o Traffic control plans which comply warning signs could potentially result with CalTrans' Manual of Traffic in hazards to traffic during project Controls will minimize the traffic construction. hazards during construction. Noise Short-term, increased noise level impacts o Construction activities will comply will result from construction in with all applicable City and County vicinity of activities. noise ordinances. Noise attenuation devices along with proper use and maintenance of construction equipment will minimize noise. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT 6 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES Visual Resources Visual impacts from construction equipment, o Coordinate construction activities trenching, dirt piles will occur for the with landscaping programs to short term in locations where construction reestablish impacted areas. takes place. Utilities Potential disruptive impacts to public o Contacts will be made with each utilities could occur during construction affected utility to coordinate activities. activities prior to construction. Existing utility locations will be ascertained prior to final route design. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) have determined that several facilities in District 5 and the southern half of District 6 are in need of repair and rehabilitation. Some trunk sewers lack sufficient capacity to meet existing demands and others must be repaired in order to maintain adequate sewage collection services. In addition, several pump stations require modernization. Other facilities must be constructed on an as-needed basis to meet demands projected by agencies with planning jurisdiction. The CSDOC are planning to rectify deficien- cies in the systems of Districts 5 and 6 through the rehabilitation and construction of the facilities identified in the Master Plan Report and addressed in this Environmental Impact Report. B. LOCATION ,w, District 5 and the southern half of District 6 are located in the central coastal portion of Orange County generally south of the Santa Wo Ana River and north of Crystal Cove along the Pacific Coast as depicted in Figure I-1. The proposed project developments are shown in Figure I-2. C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Master Plan Report defines the improvements necessary to eliminate deficiencies in the project area's sewage collection systems. The Report also establishes a priority schedule for recommended rehabilita- tion and construction of sewage facilities consistent with CSDOC financial capabilities and sewer service obligations. mi I-1 Vd 6 ! LA HABRA O ��i* O'Q•9,yC OG,y ytigO' -k BRE F ti YORBA FU RTON U. LINDA �� .' se fto-# �+ y Riverside PLACENTIA _w4e wAi **LABUENA Fwy• VILLA 004P PARK o PALMA N EIM Q PAR! �, CYPRESS STANTON 4°� O ORANGE LOS Oy #ALAMITOS Q GARDEN T v GROVE SEAL q ;� I WESTMINSTER O TUSTIN� SANTA �0 11 ANA FOU AIN 1 VAL San oz r GTON 6 Fwy ACH COSTA .o MESA eoif�c IRVINE OCEAN OUTFALL NO.002 OCEAN OUTFALL NO.001 I PACIFIC OCEAN FIGURE 1-1 w PC^&in r•Q � 1 NORTH ti 1CT +` D1N9TRICT0 Rehabllltale Ow { PuMP Sta/bn- —`__ lhondon EdrlRr, fa ,t1 \� .�• areA MOM S ` Caalo Del Nor \ 6-m cow•M . Pure Station \ I Cove a" •.` PUrlp Steflom Blfter Point a�.•• •'�a0 'Ae Street Pump Station I!do Pump Sichmm ropotN Dog,. I Stag. I{fA SInM cam"Sherri Purlp Station 04• „0 Pony Station Rocky Point LEGEND Pump Station till• REHABILITATE FORCE MAINS r REHABILITATE GRAVITY SEWER eases NEW GRAVITY SEWER M� NEW FORCE MAIM 0 EXISTING PUMP STATION REHABILITATION. PROPOSED PUMP STATIONS ---- DISTRICT NOUNOANY FIGURE 1-2 The Master Plan Report proposes the following improvements: I. Rehabilitation Protects a. Balboa Peninsula Trunk: Parallel of 16-in. line and parallel or slip-line of 27 in. line between Lido Pump Station and Pacific Coast Highway. b.+ b. Coast Trunk: Reconstruction of 33-in. line between Rocky Point Pump Station and Bay Bridge Pump Station. c. Coast Trunk: Slip-line or parallel of 27-in. line between Peninsula Trunk and Bitter Point Pump Station. d. Coast Trunk: Slip-line, parallel or reconstruction of 27-in. line between Bitter Point Pump Station and Santa Ana River. e. Coast Trunk: Possible reconstruction of 24-in. force main on north side of Pacific Coast Highway between Rocky Point Pump , Station and Santa Ana River. f. Balboa Peninsula - Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Balboa Trunk from the Lido Pump Station to G Street to address the problem of salt water intrusion and correct deterioration of the line. 2. New Construction Program a. Bay Bridge Pump Station - Upgrade of pumping capacity; modification of existing facility; possible construction of standby power facilities; reconstruction of 27-in. connection between station and valve vault. b. Bayside Drive Trunk Parallel - Parallel of 18-in. section with new 36-in. section. hr 1-2 �d c. Bayside Drive Trunk Extension - Construction of 24-in. extension from abandoned Bayside Drive Pump. Station to Corona del Mar Pump Station. 3. Pump Station Maintenance a. "A" Street Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. b. 14th Street Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. c. Lido Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. d. Rocky Point Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. e. Bitter Point Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. 4. South Coast Development a. Cameo Shores Pump Station - Reconstruction of existing city owned pump station. b. Cameo Shores Force Main - Construction of force main between Cameo Shores Pump Station and Coast Trunk. c. Crystal Cove Pump Station - Construction of new pump station. d. Coast Trunk Extension - Construction of new force main and 24-in. gravity line in or adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway; parallel or replacement of existing 15-in. line in Pacific Coast Highway with 24-in. line; these lines to be built between Corona del Mar and proposed Cyrstal Cove Pump Stations. e. Crystal Cove Extension - Construction of 18-in. gravity line from westerly limit of the Irvine Company's proposed 375 acre tract to Crystal Cove Pump Station. I-3 r D. SCHEDULE To date, none of the projects identified in the Master Plan Report have been implemented. It is anticipated that the construction, rehabilita- tion and repair of the recommended facilities will extend from 1984 through 1989 and beyond. E. INTENDED USES OF THE EIR Prior to implementation of the proposed project developments identified in the Master Plan, approvals or permits may be required from the following agencies: Permit/Action Agency 6W Certification of the EIR CSDOC v Construction Permits for each California Coastal Commission Proposed Improvement City of Newport Beach ;r City of Costa Mesa County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Encroachment Permit for State CalTrans Highways Easement Approval California Department of Parks and Recreation Section 1601-3 California Department of Fish and Game v I-4 �+ m Udd II. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES bw A. TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS AND GEOLOGY bob 1. Existing Conditions District 5 and the south half of District 6 are located in the Newport Beach coastal area at the southern edge of the Orange County coastal plain. Major topographical features in the region include the gently rolling San Joaquin Hills to the east, Newport Mesa and its steep bluffs to the north, the Santa Ana River to the northwest, Upper and Lower Newport Bay to the north and south, respectively, and the Pacific Ocean coastline to the south. In general, the project area overlies marine terrace and alluvial soils, comprising two primary soil associations. The Hueneme-Bolsa Association occurs between the Santa Ana River and the intersection of Canal and 62nd Streets located north of Pacific Coast Highway. This soil association consists of nearly level, poorly drained, calcareous fine sandy loams, silt loams, and silty clay loams on alluvial fans and flood plains. The Myford Association occurs between the Canal-62nd Street intersection and the Crystal Cove area. This association consists of nearly level to moderately steep, moderately well-drained sandy loams that have a strongly developed subsoil. The Newport Beach area's geologic setting has resulted from natural taw deposition, land uplift, erosion, and historic sea level changes: In general, the area's geologic profile consists of alluvium and km, marine terrace deposits overlying formations of sedimentary bedrock. The San Joaquin Hills to the east are part of the Peninsular Range Province and consist of sedimentary and volcanic aw rocks that have been broadly folded along a north-south-trending anticline. I.. The project area is generally located in a region of historic faulting and geologic uplift which has produced a succession of wave-cut terraces. The U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey estimates the current rate of uplift to be about 0.02 feet per year. (l) Fault zones and regional seismicity in the project area are shown in Figure II-1. The primary active fault in the area is the Newport-Inglewood Fault 6" Zone. This fault system trends to the southeast from Baldwin Hills in the Los Angeles Basin, passes through Signal Hill in the Long Beach area, and then extends offshore after passing through the Huntington Beach-Costa Mesa area. The 1933 Long Beach earthquake of 6.3 Richter magnitude, as well as the quakes of 1941 and 1944 occur- red on this fault. A maximum probable earthquake on the Newport- Inglewood fault with its epicenter near the project area could gener- ate a peak bedrock acceleration of 0.24 g. If the epicenter were very close to the project area this could exceed 0.3 g. (2) A main branch of the Newport-Inglewood fault zone, the North Branch, is believed to occur north of the Superior Avenue-Pacific Coast Highway intersection on Newport Mesa, and has been the subject of .+ various studies. The Final EIR General Plan Amendment 81-2 Banning-Newport Ranch(2 describes the potential location of the North Branch and is hereby incorporated by reference. As at other locations along the Newport-Inglewood Zone, an economically important oil field underlies the lowlands east of the Santa Ana River and west of Newport Mesa. Other active fault zones in the Southern California area include the Whittier-Elsinore (24 miles distant) , Sierra Madre-San Fernando (37 miles) , San Jacinto (48 miles) and San Andreas (53 miles) systems. 1. Jones and Stokes, 1976. 2. Sawyer, Frederick, G. Philips Brandt Reddick, Inc. 1981. II-2 end —•.•--'r. ! ,�, r ` ♦��e ` `41/s6�IM dad i9le o �4+ ` 1971 I899bus w; .�►��• �\ �t " L 0 S-, A N 6 E iL E Sft* �•Gt s '°•�o 1jWr to "m "*"N00 aU I ° �4s 4�. � �• .� ERIVMJ00 • sift ��►o►VGA1 F_WLT ► N 1907 iaU`�• t1l 7—''r t�tir �/ • NAYM�N �O OtNw ►+ " 9FJ�NO�piN h���ttr� F _ AIM y`�Y t!' * q _ Q`�y ;w�A = LOS 1920 '�_ ;�� / s —MfsS�pN - — M 6.5 ....... ANGEL S RIVERSIDE c� �+�„� I •�IlMlrrr, f+ ! ��r �� l • ••saNTw 1923 toy' Sv 1�I�'i,�S -• ;LONG mow► \ M 6.3 '1, e� AC i INORE I Y 1. M 7+ tow ���r'• Y63 �/ 1937 J" STUDY AREAtmd 1894 MAJOR EARTHQUAKES AND RECENTLY ACTIVE FAULTS IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION EXPlJWAT101�Y t=W ACnW Fst✓<]s W rOW8 Q =Ar*d '" Mw�w.tc.rti o"40 .q w 0.r .rw r 1r r*"itW am 4 dooms Nom" s mMIti/MHM'��19C6�Mi�f1��N .np�w Nr um"mot, 6 rn•eit wean e,N*A!M•M.1-,to `r— law."w.rw wvf.ww•..M•�/+r fto ww*v wwt rwd nrwre a+•y• �trpK w/MMM V�te•w r 0 A w�ewpr w�w11IM.w of�"Pow too am wow 7*am wtl wr IM wMrw I�IS>'I rrt w/rom w wr*4•,w Iw,r I!N•rNl a 2!w or• Wm • Weem.wwt ail I moow�rrr—warn w rh 40•rw � i��MIl tw�wr Srw AMw) �/ p.M rf11•q7! ,im, REGIONAL SEISMICITY FIGURE II-1 I.r 2. Impacts 6W In general, rehabilitation of the proposed sewage collection `d facilities will create impacts that are only short term in nature. Excavation during construction will result in the removal of excess `r soils which may require disposal at local landfills, use at landscape projects or use as fill material at other construction Lei projects. WW Excavation of soil materials during construction will expose them briefly to the actions of wind and water erosion. Runoff of L materials may impact adjacent waterways or storm drains during rainy periods. Potential seismic events resulting from nearby active faults in the project area include fault displacement, ground shaking, soil W+ liquefaction, differential settling and other related hazards. In the event of a major seismic event, sewer facilities would be exposed to damage that could result in pipeline rupture and spillage. 3. Mitigation Measures o Periodic soil material wetting in the areas under construction should be accomplished to reduce the effects of wind erosion. o Excess soils excavated during construction will be removed and disposed or used in an appropriate manner. �+ o Soils used in backfilling will be suitably compacted and replanted, if vegetation has been removed, to reduce erosion potential. o Appropriate methods for construction in the bluff areas (Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove) should be based on detailed soils and WW geologic study. I I-3 o Rehabilitated sewer lines should be constructed to conform with appropriate design criteria and regulations to prevent damage from seismic events and to comply with requirements of local jurisdictions. B. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 1. Existing Conditions met The project area lies within the Lower Santa Ana River watershed. The entire Santa Ana River Basin contains the largest river system call in Southern California, covering over 3,200 square miles. Receiving waters within the project area include the Santa Ana River and nearby Greenville-Banning Channel, Upper and Lower Newport Bay, and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. Drainage patterns are generally to the southeast and southwest, following existing topography as well end as existing flood control and storm drain infrastructure in urban- ized areas. Perennial freshwater flows generally are limited to wo inflow to Upper Newport Bay from San Diego Creek (average low flow of 10 cfs) and the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel (average low flow of 2 cfs) .(3) The remainder of the project area experiences inter- mittent surface flows produced by storm runoff. Storm waters generally contain silt, sediment, oil, grease, pesticides, am fertilizer and other components derived from urban land uses. Areas with potentially substantial flood hazards in the project area include the mouth of the Santa Ana River, Newport Bay, and Balboa Peninsula, which are indicated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) prepared by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, Federal Insurance Administration in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program. (4) Pacific Coast Highway near its intersection with Superior Avenue and Balboa Boulevard could 3. U.S. Department of Transportation, et al. 1975. 4. Phillips Brandt Reddick, Inc. 1982. d bed II-4 also experience drainage problems during periods of heavy storm runoff. (4) A major body of receiving water, Upper Newport Bay, receives runoff `W and drainage from about 154 square miles of foothills and coastal plain. Upper Newport Bay is currently under an intensive study sponsored by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) , with the assistance of participating agencies. The studies L, are being conducted under the auspices of the Federal 11208" planning program. Planning issues focus on reducing pollution of the Bay. Principal pollutants adversely affecting the Bay are siltation (from erosion, agricultural uses, and urban construction within the watershed) , high nutrient levels of runoff (mostly from agricultural fertilization) , and potential effects of high pesticide levels (from irrigation runoff) . High bacterial counts (coliforms) are common in the Bay, but their cause has not been determined. (5) On Balboa Peninsula, there has been a history of dry weather surcharge conditions in the areas's sewerage system. According to Shaller and Lohr's 1979 Facility Report on Pump Station "A"(6) and the Master Plan Report for District 5 and the South Half of District WW 6,(7) the amount of sewage flow consisting of seawater has increased from 27% computed in 1964 to 43% computed in 1979. hog Portions of the District's main line trunk sewers and the City of Newport Beach collection system were installed as early as 1936. L' Due to the age of the system, structural conditions may be the cause of seawater intrusion. This suspicion is substantiated by the fact that the Newport Beach-maintained collection system partially consists of old, deteriorated cement lines.(7) 4. Phillips Brandt Reddick, Inc. 1982. 5. Larry Seeman Associates, Inc. 1983. 6. Shaller & Lohr, Inc. 1979. 7. Shaller & Lohr, Inc. 1983. v II-5 2. Impacts Surface and groundwater hydrology in Districts 5 and 6 do not indicate any unique engineering problems for implementation of the proposed rehabilitation and construction projects. During project construction, potential short-term impacts could occur from soil disturbance caused by excavations and construction vehicle useage leading to increased erosion and siltation until project areas are resurfaced or revegetated. Infiltration of groundwater and surface water may become present during trenching activities. Locations where groundwater or flooding occurs during rehabilitation activities will be pumped to nearby sewers or storm drains and discharged in compliance with the appropriate CSDOC's NPDES dewatering permit. No increase or decrease in percolation of water is anticipated because of the sewage line locations in existing streets. Grades along Pacific Coast Highway require sewage to be pumped via force mains at certain locations. Since the mortar lined and coated steel pipe used in pipeline construction is susceptible to sulfide deterioration, the potential for a spill exists at certain locations. ,6 A spill from a force main is particularly disruptive since the line must be shut down for repairs. This in turn could result in traffic being disrupted along Pacific Coast Highway and untreated sewage flowing into Newport Bay. Although this scenario is not likely to occur with any degree of frequency, it has happened in the past and caused significant short-term adverse environmental impacts. In the event of such an emergency event, CSDOC has contingency plans in place to respond rapidly to such situations. Rehabilitation of the deteriorated sewerage system, particularly in the Balboa Peninsula, will significantly reduce the amount of sea water infiltration/inflow and correspondingly reduce the volume of sewage influent requiring treatment. low d 7. Shaller & Lohr, Inc. 1983. `i II-6 bow i 3. Mitigation Measures o Infiltration by groundwater during construction can be controlled by established CSDOC dewatering techniques and discharged in compliance with appropriate regulations. o Surface water runoff will be handled by the existing storm drain system. Sandbagging or other appropriate techniques will be used to divert storm flows from open trenches. o Appropriate pipeline engineering measures will be employed to ensure minimum infiltration of groundwater or seawater into the rehabilitated sewage system. V o The proposed project itself is considered a major mitigation measure since it will significantly reduce the chances of a spill occurring. If one would occur, sewage could be re-routed to a parallel line. Project plans call for the rehabilitation and slip-lining of various sections of deteriorated pipeline in �+ Pacific Coast Highway. In addition, existing lines could be paralleled or replaced at certain locations. 6, In the unlikely event that a spill would occur, CSDDC maintenance personnel on standby-basis would quickly respond and remain on the scene of a spill until the spill conditions were corrected and pipeline operations returned to normal. C. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1. Existing Conditions Most of the proposed construction and rehabilitation work in 6W District 5 and the south half of District 6 is expected to occur within or adjacent to existing roadways, thus eliminating potential WW impacts to existing biological resources. Possible exceptions would be the proposed 15-inch gravity line southeast of the Cameo 6W I I-7 ``' Shores pump station and the rehabilitation of the existing 24-inch portion of the Coast Trunk on the lowland area between the Santa Ana River Channel and Newport Mesa. The proposed 15-inch Cameo Shores gravity line would extend along the coastal bluff for about 1/4 mile southeast of the Cameo Shores pump station. Field visits to the Cameo Shores area were made by Envirosphere staff on January 23, and February 10, 11, and 18, 1984. Coastal bluff vegetation extends back from the bluff edge for about 10 to 20 feet, and is dominated by perennial shrubs, such as Isomeris arborea var. arborea (bladderpod) , Encelia californica Wei (bush sunflower) and Artemisia californica (California sagebrush) . A dirt road parallels the bluff and is located about 30 feet from the edge. No vegetation is present on the road surface. North of tmb the road is disturbed coastal sage scrub vegetation with plants such as Baccharis glutinosa (coyote bush) , Avena fatua (wild oat) , wo isolated Nicotiana lg auca (tree tobacco) , clumps of Eriogonum fasciculatum (California buckwheat) , Rumex sp. (curly dock) and others. Wildlife observed here include various passerine birds and small rodents (e.g., ground squirrel) . No rare, endangered or threatened plant or animal species are known to occur along the proposed alignment. However, Chorizanthe staticoides ssp. chrysacantha (Orange County turkish rugging) is known to occur on the bluffs at Pelican Point, about halfway between Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove. This species was located by Envirosphere staff at Pelican Point but was not found along the proposed alignment east of Cameo Shores. Upper Newport Bay is the sole major estuarine system for 400 miles im+ between Morro Bay and Estero de Punta Banda, Mexico. Upper Newport Bay plays a major role in local and regional marine and terrestrial ecology. The Say's marshes and shallow waters provide a nursery for a diversity of fish, invertebrate, and zooplankton species. Aquatic birds feed on small fish and plankton and use the marshlands and vegetation for nesting. Migratory birds, potentially numbering in the millions each year, use the Bay as a stopover. Deeper waters �' II-8 harbor large fish, as well as crustacea and other invertebrates. The endangered California Brown Pelican, California Least Tern and Light-Footed Clapper Rail are known to occur in Upper Newport Bay. bow The endangered American Peregrine Falcon, Southern Bald Eagle, and the rare California Black Rail may also frequent Upper Newport Bay. (3) 6OW The existing 24-inch portion of the Coast Trunk located between the Santa Ana River and the Newport Mesa bluffs lies in a disturbed lowland area. This lowland area has been extensively developed for oil drilling operations. It is currently traversed by a number of dirt access roads and contains numerous oil wells. The soil generally is a sandy alluvial loam and is quite alkaline. Salt- tolerant weedy species including Gasoul crystallinum (iceplant), Amaranthus spp. (aramanths), Bassia hyssopifolia (bassia) , y Chenopodium spp. (three species) , Ambrosia psilostachya (ragweed), Xanthium strumarium (cocklebur) , Silybum marianum (milk thistle) , 601 Ricinus communis (castor bean), and other indicators of alkaline. soils. Along the narrow estuarine channel which parallels Canal Street and 62nd Street north of the Pacific Coast Highway, vegetation includes salt marsh species such as Salicornia virginica , (pickleweed) , Frankenia grandifolia (frankenia) , Spartina foliosa (cord grass), Bassia hyssopifolia (bassia) , Suaeda californica (sea-blite) and other typical species. Birds utilizing the lowland area include predators such as hawks and owls. Birds using the estuarine channel area include shore, marsh, and wading birds (e.g., marbled godwits, willets, grebes). Birds frequenting the channels also use the Santa Ana River and adjacent Greenville-Banning Channel .(8) The endangered least tern is known to frequent the area around the Santa Ana River mouth. (13) 1 6W 3. U.S. Department of Transportation, et al. 1975. 8. Dixon, P.S. and G.A. Marsh. 1973. 13. State Coastal Conservancy . II-9 The portion of the estuarine channel along 62nd Street contains narrow margins of native Salicornia virginica bordered by introduced iceplant, ornamental trees and shrubs, some Ricinus communis (castor bean) and other non-native plant species. Western grebes, gulls, and snowy egrets also use this channel. Along Canal Street, the channel margin was predominantly vegetated by Salicornia virginica. The lowlands extending from the Canal Street-62nd Street area to the Santa Ana River appear to consist of salt marsh wetland habitat, as evidenced by Salicornia virginica, and disturbed coastal sage scrub-ruderal type habitat, probably due to disruption caused by oil drilling operations. This area is useful to salt marsh wildlife species, in addition to birds, smaller mammals and reptiles common in disturbed areas. The Federal and State endangered Cordylanthus maritimus, ssp maritimus salt marsh bird's beak, is known to occur in the salt marsh plant community, similar to that found east of the Santa Ana River, and is known to occur in Upper- Newport Bay, just a few miles �+ to the southeast. This plant species could potentially occur near the project area. 2. Impacts Implementation of the improvements identified in the Master Plan Report will have the potential for short-term construction and long-term operational impacts affecting biological resources in the project area to varying degrees. Little or no impact will occur in the following areas: b, - Balboa Peninsula Trunk - Bayside Drive Trunk parallel and extension - Coast Trunk extension between Marguerite Street and Crystal Cove - Cameo Shores force main on Milford Drive and Brighton Road II-10 bow Little to No Significant Impacts. For the areas listed above implementation of the proposed project will occur mainly along or within existing roadways. These areas primarily contain disturbed or landscape vegetation and are not significant biological resources. Removal or disturbance of such vegetation cannot be avoided and will have little or no significant long term biological impact. bow There will be some potential for biological impacts in the areas listed below. However, if appropriate mitigation measures are WW implemented, impacts can be reduced to insignificant levels. a. Coast Trunk rehabilitation between the Santa Ana River and 62nd Street b. Newport Bay area c. Cameo Shores area east of Cameo Shores Drive iMW d. Crystal Cove area Potentially Significant Impacts a. Coast Trunk between the Santa Ana River and 62nd Street. This area has been highly disturbed by oil field activities and contains salt marsh wetlands as well as disturbed coastal sage scrub and ruderal vegetation. Potentially significant effects include the following: - Potential erosion and subsequent siltation from construction activities, including grading and spoil piles. Siltation caused by storm runoff could adversely affect benthic organisms in the estuarine channel as well as the salt marsh wetland. ew Potential compaction of soils along the pipeline corridor cld retard the growth of natural revegetation. Potential habitat destruction resulting from construction activities. Portions of salt marsh and disturbed coastal sage scrub vegetation could be destroyed, thus eliminating habitat for wildlife in the area. Temporary disruption of wildlife due to construction noise and traffic in project area. Potential disruption of an endangered plant species, Salt Marsh Bird's Beak (Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus) . The occurrence or absence of this species should be WWJ positively determined prior to actual project implementation. Its presence could not be confirmed during the course of this law study because this species is an annual and normally does not bloom until March to May. It remains in bloom usually until September-October. Disruption of nesting birds in the salt marsh near 62nd Street. b. Newport Bay Area Potential erosion and subsequent siltation from construction, including spoil piles. Siltation caused by storm runoff could adversely affect benthic organisms in the Bay. «d c. Cameo Shores Area (15-inch gravity line southeast of Cameo Shores Drive) - Potential wildlife habitat disturbance from construction activities. tw 'w' II-12 r d. Crystal Cove Area y - Potential compaction of soils along pipeline corridor, could r retard the growth of natural revegetation. - Removal of vegetation during construction, thus reducing wildlife habitat. Pump Station Rehabilitation and Construction. Rehabilitation and construction of pump stations as described for the proposed projects how will involve on-site construction activities only. iow 3. Mitigation Measures MW The following measures are proposed to reduce potentially adverse impacts on biological resources in estuarine areas. These measures would be adequate to lessen impacts to insignificant levels and no unavoidable significant adverse impacts would be expected. o Adequate procedures must be employed to prevent the spill of potentially harmful substances into the wetlands area east of the Santa Ana River and Newport Bay. o Following construction, areas of exposed earth should be revegetated using only native plant species which can establish themselves rapidly, to provide a protective cover. o Construction equipment and spoil material should be confined to existing roadways to the extent possible. o Adverse impacts to aquatic and estuarine resources resulting from routine and emergency maintenance activities should be �, mitigated by the restoration of these resources to the condition which existed prior to such activities. II-13 `" m o Construction in the vicinity of 62nd Street should be timed so as to avoid disturbance to nesting bird species. These activities should be coordinated with the California Department of Fish and Game prior to construction. -00 D. AIR QUALITY am 1. Existing Conditions The project area is located within the 6,600-square mile South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) . The area's air quality is determined by existing regional ambient air quality, specific meteorological influences, the local primary pollutants added daily to the air mass, and by secondary pollutants (specifically oxidants expressed as ozone) . Air pollution is an existing problem affecting all of Southern California. District 5 and the south half of District 6 experience the high pressure system and prevailing sea breeze which limit precipitation to the winter months. This results in fair skies, moderate temperatures, fresh breezes, and the temperature inversions that cause Southern California's air quality problems. m, In Orange County, air quality data is collected by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) at various locations throughout the County. The Costa Mesa and Los Alamitos monitoring M3 stations probably are located closest to the project area and could provide the most accurate data applicable to the proposed project. Table II-1 summarizes air quality data for 1978 to 1981 at the Costa Mesa and Los Alamitos stations. In general, the air quality measured at the Costa Mesa station is good, with most pollutant levels remaining below state and federal standards a majority of the ,d time. Air quality measured at the Los Alamitos station generally is poorer with higher levels of oxidant (ozone) and particulate sulfate. 'ow II-14 TABLE II-1 AIR QUALITY DATA: COSTA MESA AND LOS ALAMITOS, 1978 TO 1981 I 1978 I 1979 I 1980 I 1981 STANDARD OR I I I I POLLUTANT I CRITERIA I (Costa MesalLos AlamitoslCosta MesalLos AlamitoslCosta MesalLos AlamitoslCosta MesalLos Alamitos I I I I I I I I I Carbon 8 hrs > 9 ppm 9 days NM 18 days NM 7 days NM 5 days NM Monoxide 1 hr >35 ppm 0 days NM 0 days NM 0 days NM 0 days NM 12 hrs >10 ppm 3 days NM 5 days NM 2 days NM 1 day NM 1 hr >40 ppm -- NM 0 days NM 0 days NM 0 days NM Maximum—hourly (ppm) 18 NM 21 NM 17 NM 15 Ozone 1 hr >0.08 ppm 64 days 94 days -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 hr >0.12 ppm -- -- 16 days 18 days 5 days 13 days 6 days 13 days 1 hr >0.10 ppm 52 days 72 days 26 days 50 days 20 days 49 days 28 days 37 days Maximum hourly (ppm) 0.22 0.27 0.21 •0.26 0.16 0.22 0.20 0.18 Nitrogen 1 hr >0.25 ppm 4 days NM 4 days NM 2 days NM 2 days NM Dioxide Maximum hourly (ppm) 0.30 NM 0.29 NM 0.31 NM 0.29 NM Particulates Samples >260 ug/m3 -- -- 0161 1161 0/20 0/57 NM 2/58 Samples >100 ug/m3 -- -- 26/61 26/61 6/20 25/57 NM 32/58 Maximum Value (ug/m3) 175 268 252 327 125 238 NM 602 Particulate Quarters >1.5 ug/m3 -- -- 0 1 0 1 NM 0 Lead Months >1.5 ug/m3 -- -- 3 3 0 1 NM 0 Maximum Value (ug/m3) -- -- 3.74 4.94 1.82 3.28 NM 2.18 Particulate Samples >25 ug/m3 -- -- 0 1 0 2 NM 1 Sulfate Maximum Value (ug/m3) -- -- 24.2 26.6 13.5 34.6 NM 26.0 I I I I I I I I I Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality in 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 --. No data NM: Not monitored 2. Impacts Implementation of the proposed projects identified in the Master Plan Report will temporarily cause exhaust and fugitive dust emissions associated with construction and rehabilitation activities. Increases in these emissions are related to mobile construction equipment and movement of soils. Impacts are expected to be of short term duration and primarily affect only the immediate vicinity but will add to the cumulative emission burden in the region during the periods of activity. These emissions are expected to be insignificant for both the short and long term. Positive impacts will be achieved for both the vicinity and regional air quality by implementation of the Master Plan. Rehabilitation through modernization and the construction of project pump stations will result in these stations operating more efficiently by reducing power consumption an estimated 15%. This savings in energy will cause a decrease in electricity used by the existing and less efficient pump stations. 3. Mitigation Measures o Control techniques for minimization of fugitive dust emissions by appropriate means (watering) will be implemented. o Compliance with SCAQMD Rules and Regulations will also minimize fugitive dust emissions during construction and rehabilitation of the facilities. o The use of efficient powered construction equipment should be encouraged in order to minimize exhaust emissions. Ind fted Unj II-15 WW E. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Existing Conditions As part of this EIR, an archeological records search was conducted by Archeological Resource Management Corp. (ARMC) . The results of ` the search are summarized below. See Appendix B for the entire report. Coast Trunk Rehabilitation Projects �+ - CA-Ora-148. Previously recorded prior to a 1975 survey done for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by the University of California, Riverside Archeological Research Unit (UCRARU) . This site was again found during this 1975 survey. In 1975 it was described as a heavily impacted shell midden. CA-Ora-148, which has since been destroyed by oil operations, was located on the Newport Mesa bluff about 500 feet north and east of Bench Mark No. 9 on the U.S.G.S. Newport Beach 75' Quadrangle Map (north of Pacific Coast Highway and east of 60th Street) . - CA-Ora-839. Located in the 1975 survey done by UCRARU. Archeological Associates Limited (AA) also located the site in a 1979 survey done for Mobil Oil which was subsequently destroyed by grading operations. The site was described as a heavily impacted shell midden, located on Mobil Oil Company property, east of the Santa Ana River. - CA-Ora-843. First located in 1979 by AA. The site, while it had been damaged by oil operations, still retained intact midden which warranted protection. CA-Ora-843 was subsequently fenced to protect it from further encroachment. The site is located on the edge of the Newport Mesa bluff approximately 200 feet north of the proposed pipeline rehabilitation area located between Canal Street and the Santa Ana River. II-16 two Bayside Drive Trunk Parallel and Extension aw This area has been previously surveyed for archeological resources prior to its development. The first survey was carried out in 1912 by N.C. Nelson and a second in 1966 by the Pacific Coast Archeo- Da, logical Society (PCAS) . No formal reports exist for these surveys, but notes taken by the surveyors are available and were used to WO ascertain the presence or absence of sites in this area. It should be noted that this area has since been intensely developed and little possibility exists for the presence of any archeological resources. The early surveys did not find any archeological sites in this portion of Newport Beach and with subsequent development, there is little possibility that any sites would remain to be impacted by construction activities. Coast Trunk Extension, Cameo Shores, and Crystal Cove The records search for this portion of the study area indicates that all of the property to the east of Cameo Shores had been previously surveyed for archeological resources, but due to residential development, the western portion (beginning with Cameo Shores) had not. The surveys conducted in the area include: o Survey by N. Nelson Leonard of the UCLA Archeological Survey in .d 1963. o Los Trancos-Moro Canyons Survey by Archeological Research Inc. in 1972-3. o Irvine Costal Survey by Archeological Research Inc. in 1977. o Survey by State Department of Parks and Recreation for Crystal Cove State Park in 1980. o Irvine Coastal Survey by Larry Seeman and Associates in 1981. As a result of these surveys, five sites have been identified in close proximity to the proposed construction areas. Four of these could be directly affected, and one could be indirectly affected by construction activities. II-17 i CA-Ora-l. This site is located at Crystal Cove on the south side_ of Pacific Coast Highway. This site was officially recorded by Briggs in 1949 based on information gleaned from the WPA survey conducted under the direction of Winterbourne in the 1930's. It is possible that the site was first discovered by Herman Strandt in the 1920's. This site is described as a partially intact shell midden site which yielded a well made mortar and fragments of metates. CA-Ora-130. This site was recorded by N. Nelson Leonard in 1963 and was subsequently excavated by students from Orange Coast and Saddleback Colleges as well as by archeologists from the State Department of Parks and Recreation (Barter 1983; Cottrell et al., 1983) . This site is located 200 feet to the east of the terminus of the gravity lines near the Cameo Shores Pump Station. - CA-Ora-246. This site is located directly north of the fence line which borders the north side of Pacific Coast Highway at the mouth of Los Trancos Canyon. The site was originally taw recorded by PCAS members Robinson and McKinney in 1967 as a prehistoric site. In 1977 this site was relocated during the Archeological Research Inc. survey and was described as primarily a historic deposit, possibly dating to the 1940's. r.+ CA-Ora-665. This site is located on the bluff edge approximately 300 feet from the southwest corner of Cameo Shores development boundary. The site was located in 1977 during the Archeological Research Inc. survey conducted for the Irvine Company and is described as a roughly oval shell midden with occasional flakes. Artifacts observed included shellfish remains, cores, and debitage. taw CA-Ora-995. This site is located about 600 feet (200 meters) northwest of the Tri-Star Company parking lot, between Pacific i.r Coast Highway and the bluff overlooking the ocean. The site was located by State Department of Parks and Recreation personnel in II-18 ''' 1980 and described as a shallow grayish midden with moderate flake and shell scatter. This particular site is located at the terminus of the southernmost proposed gravity line. 2. Impacts The proposed rehabilitation and construction of gravity lines, force mains, and pump stations in the south half of District 6 should have no adverse impacts on any archeological resources. In District 5, however, there may be negative impacts to the five archeological sites described above. Four of these may be directly affected (CA-Ora-1, CA-Ora-246, CA-Ora-665, CA-Ora-965) and one may be indirectly affected (CA-Ora-130) . 3. Mitigation Measures old It is recommended that the directly affected sites be surveyed in the field when detailed plans are available to determine impacts. "w If any of these sites are to be adversely affected by the project, they will require a test level investigation to ascertain their ow significance prior to the formulation of final mitigation measures. The one site which may be indirectly affected by construction should ,w, also be checked in the field when more detailed plans are available to determine potential secondary impacts. The site, if it is in close proximity to, but not in the construction area, may be flagged WO or fenced to protect it from equipment damage. aw F. LAND USE/RELEVANT PLANS WI 1. Existing Conditions OW Land Use Figure II-2 depicts land uses within District 5 and the south half of District 6. Below is a discussion of land uses adjacent to each project component. II-19 Kul I'M NORTH L -�VA� 'tom ��. �•�� 'J T 1 ^1v LEGEND ��; ,- � Ae_c....A� �� •� _ ' ' LAND USE `` - •�- — Low OEMLTT RE510[Milµ �•�,..,�-�,tiiir ,� MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - "" DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL v A c I r I C C INDUSTRIAL - RECREATIONAL a OPEN VACE O STATE IS rEOERAL INSTITUTIONS COUNT♦ SANITATION DISTRICTS O. -- CITY DART LAND U S E M A P COANGE COUNTT•CALIFO1INIA DISTRICT SOUiGARY DISTRICT NO S ANC SOUT''ALF DISTRICT I•: E -- DNAIAIAGE AREA BOUNDARY DISTRICT NO.5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT NO.6 T. DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS — aowDARY NORTH AND sou w rs Lr OF DISTRICT FIGURE II-2sTRCT wo a ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA suE�t... • tgNA.Lvc. m two - Coast Trunk Rehabilitation Projects. Between the Santa Ana River and Canal Street, the alignment traverses an actively producing oil field. From Canal Street to Pacific Coast Highway it lies along a residential area and the drainage canal located along 62nd Street. Between 61st Street and Bay Bridge Pump Station the alignment is bordered primarily by commercial land uses. Balboa Peninsula. This area is predominately residential with a concentration of commercial uses in downtown Newport Beach and in the vicinity of Balboa Pier. Bayside Drive Trunk Parallel and Extension. This area is predominantly residential, with some commercial uses scattered along the length of Bayside Drive between Pacific Coast Highway and E1 Paseo Street. - Coast Trunk Extension. Through Corona del Mar the alignment is primarily bordered by commercial businesses. From Poppy Avenue to the Newport Beach city limits, including Cameo Shores, adjacent uses are residential. From Cameo Shores to Crystal Cove, the alignment along Pacific low Coast Highway is through generally undeveloped areas. A commerical equestrian center is located on the south side of the roadway about one mile northwest of Crystal Cove. to, - Cameo Shores Area. The force main to be built in Milford Road and `W Cameo Shores Drive passes through the Cameo Shores housing development. The gravity line extension to be built southeast of Cameo Shores would traverse open space planned for future residential develop- ment by the Irvine Company. Currently being planned for submittal to the Orange County Environmental Agency is a tentative tract map for a 70 to 80 lot residential development to be built adjacent to Cameo Shores, which would be served by the proposed gravity line. m II-20 I I This tentative tract map has not yet been submitted (as of February 3, 1984) but is expected to be in the near future. (9) Crystal Cove Area. The State Department of Parks and Recreation have jurisdiction over the 2,800-acre Crystal Cove State Park. The alignment will traverse a portion of the park. The park is planned to have a low intensity of development with such facilities as parking and some concessionaires. (10) Near the Crystal Cove area and within the general Irvine Coast, future commercial land uses are planned. These future uses include a 90-acre tract with hotel facilities of up to 1,500 rooms and up to 250,000 square feet of office and commercial space, and a 35-acre tract with hotel facilities of up to 250 rooms and up to 25,000 square feet of commercial land uses. This future development has been approved by the County of Orange but specific project plans have not yet been made or approved. (10) Relevant Plans w - City of Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach has planning jurisdiction for the following portions of the project area: Coast Trunk Rehabilitation between Canal Street and Bay Bridge Pump Station, Balboa Peninsula, Bayside Drive, Pacific Coast Highway to Cameo Shores, and Cameo Shores housing development. - County of Orange; Planning Commission/Board of Supervisors. The County of Orange Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have the planning approval responsibility for the remainder of the project area, including the Coast Trunk Rehabilitation between jam, 9. Personal Communication with Orange County Environmental Management Agency, February 3, 1984. 10. Ibid., February 6, 1984. Canal Street and the Santa Ana River, Pacific Coast Highway from Cameo Shores to Crystal Cove, and the Crystal Cove area. The Irvine Company's Land Use and Circulation Plan was approved in 1981 for the Irvine Coast Area. The Sanitation District's Master Plan Report was written based upon that document, which has not been amended since its adoption in 1981. Projected land uses to be served by the proposed Bayside Drive and Coast Trunk Extension have been approved by the County of Orange.(10) - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are responsible for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater generated within the south half of District 6 and District' 5. SCAG Growth Forecast Policy. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) develops a Growth Forecast Policy every two `1 to four years as a part of its Development Guide Program. Growth forecasts are made for counties, cities, and regional statistical areas. Policies that influence the forecasts are a) encouraging growth on a regional scale to occur in a balanced manner within existing urban areas and in currently unurbanized areas; b) encouraging growth on a subregional scale to take place in a concentrated, compact form; c) balancing commercial, industrial, and employment growth with the population of each subregion; and d) preserving the region's natural resources and phase development according to an area's ability to accommodate growth. District 5 and the south half of District 6 are located within Regional Statistical Area (RSA) 39. SCAG is anticipating popula- tion to increase from 170,600 in 1980 to 257,000 in the year 2000. Commensurate increases are expected for housing and employment opportunities. 10. Personal Communication with Orange County Environmental Management Agency February 6, 1984. II-22 Santa Ana Regional Water Quality _Control Board Basin Plan, 1983 Amendments. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the jurisdiction of which includes the study area, is one of nine regional boards established throughout the state. As authorized by the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the Board is responsible for regional water quality control within the Santa low Ana region. Additionally, the Regional Board is designated as the state water pollution control agency for all purposes stated in the federal Water Pollution Control Act. km The SARWQCB recently updated their Basin Plan, the objective of which is to show how the quality of the surface and ground waters �, in the Santa Ana Region should be controlled to provide the maximum benefit possible. The Regional Board implements the basin plan by issuing, and enforcing, waste discharge regulations to individuals, communities or businesses whose discharges can affect water quality. These regulations can be either Waste Discharge " Requirements, for discharges to land, or National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPOES) permits for discharges to surface waters. - Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) . The State Lewis Air Quality Act (1976) and the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments (1977) require the development of a program to meet state and federal air quality standards in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) . In February 1979, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) low adopted the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin. The Air Resources Board adopted a revised version of the AQMP in May 1979. In January 1981, EPA approved the portions of the SCAB State Implementation Plan (SIP) regarding particulate matter and NO2, however, the portions covering ozone and CO were disapproved for lack of legal authority to implement an inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. In April, 1982, EPA approved submittals to remove conditions, but continued the ozone and carbon I I-23 monoxide disapprovals. On September 10, 1982, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 33 which requires biennial I/M programs in non-attainment areas, such as the SCAB. Full implementation of the I/M programs is to begin in January 1984. The Draft 1982 Revision of the AQMP recommends control measures that when implemented, will succeed in reducing primary air emissions to the level of the state and federal air quality standards by 1987. The control measures rely heavily on continued technological improvement to both stationary and mobile pollution control equipment and the improve- ment of transit, ride-share and congestion relief. California Coastal Act of 1976. All of the project area lies within the Coastal Development Permit Zone. The Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) of the City of Newport Beach, prepared in accordance with the California Coastal Act of 1976, was approved by the California Coastal Commission in May 1982. The LCP forms the basis for the City's conservation and development decisions within the Coastal Zone of Newport Beach. (11) The County of Orange also has a Local Coastal Program for the area between Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove.(11) A Coastal Development Permit will be required prior to project MCI implementation. 2. Impacts Impacts to land uses in the project area will be short-term in nature, but unavoidable. Noise in residential neighborhoods, traffic impacts along major arterials, and impacts upon vegetation are discussed in appropriate sections of this EIR. 11. Personal Communication with City of Newport Beach, February 7, 1984. b II-24 Commercial areas (such as those along Pacific Coast Highway in EW Newport Beach, on Balboa Peninsula, and along Bayside Drive) may be impacted by construction projects should their accessways or parking areas be disrupted or blocked. Parks, such as Crystal Cove State Park, and other open space land v uses between Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove may also be temporarily affected by sewer facility construction. Construction of the Crystal Cove improvements may temporarily affect park usage or create nuisances to park users. Relevant Plans: Below is a discussion of impacts related to the agencies and plans described in Existing Conditions. L - City of Newport Beach. The proposed project does not conflict with the existing General Plan. The implementation of the sewer 'I system will correct existing deficiencies and accommodate planned future growth. Implementation of the Master Plan will not induce growth beyond what is anticipated for the City of Newport Beach. +� - County of Orange, Planning Commission/Board of Supervisors. The new construction of facilities in the South Coast area will accommodate future growth planned for and approved by the County of Orange. The rehabilitation portions of the proposed project will correct existing deficiencies in the sewer system, thus improving efficiency and reliability. Implementation of the Master Plan will not induce growth over and above the level projected and planned for the South Coast area. - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The proposed project will have a positive, beneficial effect on CSDOC by correcting system deficiencies, improving service, and providing ,r for future capacity needs. - SCAG-82 Growth Forecast Policy. The Master Plan for District 5 and the south half of District 6 is partially a result of major II-25 land use updates in the Orange County General Plan. As stated for the County of Orange above, the system improvements are intended to correct existing deficiencies in the sewer system and to accommodate planned future growth. Implementaion of the Master Plan will not induce growth over and beyond what is anticipated in SCAG's recent growth projections. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan. During project construction, open trenches may become infiltrated by groundwater or by surface runoff. The water will be pumped to a nearby sewer or storm drain and discharged in compliance with CSOOC's NPDES permit. Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) . Implementation of the ew proposed project will result in short-term air quality impacts as discussed in the Air Quality portion of Section II. The proposed project will not induce growth but rather accommodate planned growth within its service area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed sewer improvements will not result in inconsistencies with the AQMP. California Coastal Act of 1976. The proposed Master Plan will be carried out in accordance with the LCD's of the City of Newport Beach and the County of Orange. Sewer improvements in the coastal zone may require a Coastal Development Permit. Any construction in the Santa Ana River floodplain and Newport Bay wetland areas will be in compliance with the Coastal Commission policies and coordinated with the California Department of Fish and Game. 3. Mitigation Measures o The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County will coordinate Wel on each project with the affected city to determine the exact location of sewer improvements (i.e. , center of street, left side or right side) . This coordination will also enable the cities to d I I-26 phase any planned street improvements commensurate with CSDOC's efforts. o Construction hours will be modified where necessary per the request of the affected city. I.r o Access to commercial centers and parking areas should be maintained. Relevant Plans `, City of Newport Beach; County of Orange, Planning Commission/Board of Supervisors; SCAG-82 Growth Forecast Policy County Sanitation Districts of Orange County WW o No mitigation measures are necessary. Santa Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan o Any discharges into surface waters will be in conformance with CSDOC's NPDES permit. Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) rr o No mitigation measures are proposed. California Coastal Act of 1976 o Sewer improvements in the coastal zone will require a Coastal Development permit. G. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 1. Existing Conditions A traffic analysis was prepared by Kunzman Associates. The report is summarized below and contained in its entirety in Appendix C. II-27 6' The traffic conditions for all of the roadways along the proposed sewage system alignments, as they exist today, are discussed below. Existing roadway conditions along the proposed sewage master plan corrections are shown in Figures II-3 and II-4. Existing roadway conditions data is presented for each individual project and is discussed below for each roadway section. General Conditions - Existing Travel Lanes. The number of through lanes for the existing roadways are identified. Also identified is whether the roadways are divided or undivided. For divided roadways, whether the median is a raised concrete median or a striped median on the roadway is also shown. Roadways inventoried are generally fully improved with sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and roadway lighting fixtures, unless otherwise noted. m Existing Intersection Controls. Intersection controls are for traffic on the arterial alignment. Intersection controls are primarily traffic signals although some stop sign controls have been identified. Daily Traffic Volumes. The average daily two-way traffic volumes for the individual roadway segments are shown in the respective figures. Traffic volumes were obtained from the City of Newport Beach and County of Orange Environmental Management Agency and are based an Winter, 1982 traffic volume flow data. It should also be noted that many of the roadways in the area, such as East Coast Highway, West Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard experience significant increases in daily traffic volumes in the summer months due to recreational travel. Existing Daily Volume to Capacity Ratios. Roadway capacity is generally defined as the number of vehicles which can be reason- Wei ably expected to pass over a given section of the road in a given time period. Congestion, high accident rates, the quality of '�' I I-28 Figure I I-3 Existing Traffic Conditions no/na/na ti o� i` e 50-R/52/t89 �e --- P 6D-R/54/M 4D-S/M/M ��e 4D-S/52/930 PACIFIC OCEAN .�• p 41.11/20/100 � 4D-R/20/-67 213*10450 4D-R/22/73 4D-R/18/60 LMnd- Number of Through S•Striped Daily Troffle volume to 40•S/23/TT Travel Lanes —R Raised / Volume Capacity 4D-R/12/-40 2U/8/.60 D•Divided U•UndivWed Median (1000's) Ratio 4U/12/.60 • • One Way Couplet ••�- .•.�... • Traffic Signal nor Stop Sign 0 Four Wav Stop na Data Not Available ® • Proposed .Sewer Improvement f [ C E U E Ftgure I I-4 Existing Traffic Conditions 0 ar G San �pA uin Hills goad � h v a East CORSt Highway o` d � 40-R/30/LOO f 40-R/34/1.13 4D S/25/.83 2U/9/.90 8 � 2U/3/.30 2U/.5/.0 o no/na/ne NI h n Road P A C T F I C O C E A N Legend Number of Through S- Striped/Daily Traffic/VoAwne to 4D•S/23/.77 Travel Lanes —R•Raised Volume Capacity D-Divided U-Undiv►dad Median 0000's) Ratio Traffic Signal i� Stop Sign O Four Wav Stop na Data Not Available lJ�lln�{li()�l r r t Proposed Sewer Improvement i L traffic flow (Level of Service) , and environmental acceptability all come into play in defining a particular roadway's effective capacity. It is possible to identify maximum desirable volumes for typical roadway types based on the number of roadway travel lanes. These daily volumes reflect estimates of the amount of daily traffic which will result in peak hour traffic volumes " equal to maximum desirable capacity of each roadway type. The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency has developed "maximum desirable volumes" for each roadway type depicted on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. The "maximum desirable volumes," or daily road capacities, for each type of roadway classification are given in Table II-2. By dividing existing daily traffic volumes by the daily roadway capacities listed above, existing daily volume to capacity ratios W have been calculated. Daily volume to capacity ratios are based on a Level of Service C. As may be seen by reviewing the respective figures, several individual segments of the existing roadways along the proposed aligments are currently operating near or above capacity. Individual Project Alignments rr Additional information for the existing conditions on the individual project alignments are discussed below. - Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. The City of Newport Beach is the local jurisdictional agency for the proposed project along Bayside Drive. Bayside Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour between Jamboree WW Road and E1 Paseo Drive. Bayside Drive has numerous horizontal curves and limited sight visibility along its route. Frequent WW direct residential access occurs on the Newport Bay side of Bayside Drive and a steep side slope is located on the inland WW side. Bike lanes are located on both sides of the roadway while parking is only permitted on the inland side. II-29 �'' bw �; TABLE II-2 wd DAILY ROADWAY CAPACITY ESTIMATES had I IMaximum DailylVehicle Volume Facility I Lane I Level of I Level of Type I Configuration I Service C I Service D I I I Freeway 10 Lane-Divided -- 175,000 8 Lane-Divided -- 145,000 6 Land-Divided -- 115,000 4-Lane Divided -- 65,000 Major Arterial 8 Lane-Divided 602000 66,000 6 Lane-Divided 45,000 492500 Primary Arterial 4 Lane-Divided 30,000 33,000 Secondary Arterial 4 Lane-Undivided 20,000 22,000 Commuter Highway 2 Lane-Undivided 10,000 12,500 Wei Source: Orange County Environmental Management Agency April 20, 1981 memo from J. Bennett to W. Zaun. bow Bayside/Crystal Cove Trunk Sewer. Proposed systems correction sewer improvements are to be located along Bayside Drive and East Coast Highway. The local jurisdictions are the City of Newport Beach and the County of Orange, although East Coast Highway is State Highway 1 and maintained by CalTrans. Bayside Drive between Carnation Avenue and Marguerite Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway. Bayside Drive is posted with a 30 mile per hour speed limit and is constructed with curbs and gutters. 6" Parking is prohibited along portions of Bayside Drive. Adjacent land uses include a local park area and occasional residential dwellings with direct site access. East Coast Highway is a four-lane divided roadway and is constructed with raised medians, striped medians, and striped medians with raised channelized turn pockets at the intersections. Adjacent land uses include the Corona del Mar commercial area, residential devlopment, and undeveloped parcels, although direct site access is infrequent. Through the City of Newport Beach, East Coast Highway is constructed with curbs and gutters, and parking is permitted on both sides of the roadway through the commercial areas. Posted speed limits are 35 miles per hour through the commercial areas, 45 miles per hour through the area with adjacent residential uses, and 55 miles per hour through the undeveloped areas. South of Newport Beach, East Coast Highway is constructed with paved shoulders. Bike lanes are provided along its route and although parking is permitted on the coastal side, it is prohibited along the inland side. Access to the adjacent commercial stands and beach parking area is infrequent and � striped turning lanes are typically provided. WW Cameo Shores Extension Sewer. The proposed Cameo Shores extension project is located in the County of Orange jurisdiction, although it will be connected to an existing sewer in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed extension will connect to an existing sewer located along Brighton Road. Brighton Road is a local roadway in the private community of Cameo Shores. Brighton Road is posted I I-30 '-' No had with a 25 mile per hour speed limit, is fully improved with curbs and gutters, and provides direct residential driveway access to dwellings located along the coastal side. The major portion of the extension sewer is to be located south of the Cameo Shores community along the bluff. This area is undeveloped at present and has no improved roadways which would be impacted by its implementation. Cameo Shores Relief Sewer. The Cameo Shores relief sewer provides for a force main sewer connection from Brighton Road to East Coast Highway. The proposed line is located in the vicinity of Milford Drive in the Cameo Shores private community. The local jurisdiction is the City of Newport Beach. Milford Drive is a two lane undivided roadway with direct residential access on one side which serves approximately 20 existing dwelling units. Milford Drive is fully improved with curbs and gutters, and although on a grade, has intersections with seven low volume residential roadways in the Cameo Shores development. Coast Trunk Sewer - Lido Station Connection. The local jurisdiction is the City of Newport Beach although West Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard north of the Coast Highway are maintained by CalTrans. Newport Boulevard is constructed as a four lane divided roadway with a raised median although it narrows to a four lane undivided overcrossing of West Coast Highway. Parking is generally prohibited along this narrow section of Newport Boulevard although some parking is permitted in sections to service adjacent commercial land uses. The posted speed limit on Newport Boulevard is 30 miles per hour and the roadway is improved with curbs, gutter and sidewalks. Coast Trunk Sewer - Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station. West Coast Highway is designated as State Highway 1 and is maintained by CalTrans although this section of roadway is located in the City of Newport Beach. Ultimate curbs and gutters II-31 have been constructed and parking is generally prohibited along the roadway. The striped median provides for an optional left turn lane, primarily to service commercial uses on the inland side of the roadway. West Coast Highway is posted with a 40 mile per hour speed limit. Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point to Bitter Point Pump Stations. West Coast Highway is maintained by CalTrans and the local jurisdiction is the City of Newport Beach. West Coast Highway is posted with a 35 mile per hour speed limit south of Newport v Boulevard, and the posted speed limit is 45 miles per hour to the north. South of Newport Boulevard, the roadway is presently constructed with three northbound travel lanes and two southbound travel lanes. Parking is permitted on both sides of the roadway to serve adjacent commercial uses. West Coast Highway narrows to a four lane undivided roadway at its undercrossing of Newport Boulevard. North of Newport Boulevard, curbs and gutters are 6nd typically only constructed on the bayside of the roadway and parking is generally prohibited. Coast Trunk Sewer - Bitter Point Pump Station to Santa Ana River. The existing sewer alignment is located in a presently undeveloped area north of the Newport Shores community. The local jurisdiction for the project is the County of Orange. Due to the fact that this project is located outside of existing public roadways in an undeveloped area, no roadways would be impacted by this rehabilitation. Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point Pump Station to Santa Ana River. As sewer rehabilitation projects are proposed to be phased in their implementation, this project is a rehabilitation project in addition to those previously specified. The existing roadway conditions for this project have been previously identified for Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point to Bitter Point Pump Stations and Coast Trunk Sewer - Bitter Point to the Santa Ana River. I I-32 �`' no Balboa Trunk Sewer. Rehabilitation of the existing sewer is located in the City of Newport Beach. The existing sewer line is located along Newport Boulevard between the Lido Pump Station and Balboa Boulevard, and Balboa Boulevard from Newport Boulevard to G Street. Newport Boulevard is fully improved with curbs, gutters and sidewalks as a four lane roadway with raised and striped medians. Parking on Newport Boulevard is generally permitted south of 32nd Street. Between 30th Street and 23rd Street, Newport Boulevard operates as a one-way couplet system. For each travel direction as a one-way couplet, two through travel lanes are provided and parking is permitted on both sides of the street. Newport Boulevard is posted with a 30 mile per hour speed limit and adjacent uses are generally commercial. Substantial raised channelization for traffic control is constructed in the vicinity of the Newport Boulevard/Balboa Boulevard intersection. Balboa Boulevard between Newport and Alvarado is constructed with a raised median and parallel parking is provided both in the median and adjacent to the curb lane for both directions of m travel. Curbside parallel parking is also generally provided from Alvarado to G Street. The posted speed limit on Balboa Boulevard is 25 miles per hour. Balboa Boulevard is constructed with ultimate curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and adjacent uses include residential, commercial, church, school, and public uses. Both Newport Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard experience significant traffic volume increases and peaking during the summer months. m I I-33 2. Impacts Short-Term The primary impact of the proposed project will occur during the construction and implementation of the proposed sewage lines. bow Placement of the sewage lines will require the excavation of some portion of the roadway, although tunneling in some sections may also r, occur. Significant impacts in terms of traffic congestion and changes to present patterns of circulation could result, particularly v if no traffic mitigation measures are implemented. In addition, improper traffic control techniques and warning signs could potentially result in hazards to traffic during project construction. Impacts to existing traffic volumes can be minimized by varying 'r' construction techniques on a road segment by road segment basis. Potential construction techniques which can be implemented which wow would reduce traffic volume impacts include tunneling under busy intersections, restricted hours of construction, and construction ,W within the median area. Guidelines for the identification of project construction techniques and other project construction issues are discussed further in the mitigation measures. To minimize traffic hazards which may exist during project construction, traffic control plans should be prepared which comply with the Manual of Traffic Controls as published by CalTrans. Properly prepared traffic control plans will alert drivers to potential roadway hazards as they enter construction area, and provide for clear identification on how to proceed safely through the construction area. Traffic control plans should be prepared prior to the construction phase of each sewage line project, on a project by project basis, as implementation proceeds. Traffic control plans should consider the ability of alternative routes to carry existing traffic volumes and identify the hours of `" construction, and the construction site truck access routes, and the i II-34 type and location of warning signs, lights and other traffic control devices. The County Sanitation District will coordinate with local and other appropriate jurisdictions in the preparation of the traffic control plans and identification of construction techniques. The County Sanitation Districts will also comply with traffic control requirements as identified by the appropriate jurisdictions to the maximum extent possible. The construction phase of the project will generate some additional daily traffic volumes to the construction site on a daily basis. The additional traffic generated will include employee trips, and transport of equipment and materials to the site. Relative to the existing daily traffic volumes on the roadways on which construction is proposed, the additional construction project site traffic generation will be negligible. Long-Term Upon project construction completion, the roadways will be restored to their existing conditions in terms of roadway geometrics and intersection controls. From a traffic engineering perspective, the proposed sewage system improvements will have no direct long term impacts in terms of the generation of additional traffic or modifying existing traffic flow, once the proposed system is installed. 3. Mitigation Measures In this section guidelines are provided for ways to reduce traffic impacts during project construction. More stringent measures are needed on crowded streets than on lightly traveled streets. As such, separate sets of guidelines are recommended for streets with different ranges of volume to capacity ratios. As identified in the Existing Conditions section, only one existing roadway section is currently exceeding daily roadway capacity, East II-35 Coast Highway between Marguerite Avenue and Cameo Shores Road. Also of concern, however, is Bayside Drive between E1 Paseo Drive and Jamboree Road. This roadway section currently operates at 90 percent of daily roadway capacity. For these roadway sections the following construction techniques should be considered to minimize the impacts of project construction. o Tunnel under busy adjacent intersections. o Restrict construction hours to nighttime only and provide for the full number of travel lanes during the daylight hours. o Where feasible, locate sewage lines within the public right-of-way but outside of the roadway, o Where feasible, locate the sewage line along the centerline and provide for the existing number of travel lanes. o Eliminate existing on-street parking. o Relocate the sewage line to a less busy adjacent roadway where feasible. o When feasible, plan project construction to occur during the winter months and restrict construction between June and September when heavy recreational use occurs. r Although all of the above strategies are feasible for roadways operating a volume to capacity ratio of between 0.70 and 0.90, listed below are some additional strategies which are considered to be capable of adequately servicing traffic volumes in this range. o Restricted hours of construction to off peak hours only; i.e. , no construction from 7:00 to 9:00 AM or 4:00 to 6:00 PM. I I-36 `i' o Reduce the number of through travel lanes at midblock locations. a o Full street closure during nighttime hours except to service local access traffic. Listed below are several additional construction techniques which will satisfactorily service traffic volumes within the 0.30 to 0.70 traffic volume range. o Restripe existing roadways to eliminate a striped median. o Provide no restrictions on the hours of construction. For roadway segments with volume to capacity ratios of less than 0.30, the following construction techniques are anticipated to be acceptable to service existing traffic volumes. o Street closure for construction except to service local traffic and where feasible alternative parallel routes exist. �+ o No hours of construction restrictions. The appropriate construction techniques for each project should be evaluated on a project by project basis. The construction technique and method to control traffic should be incorporated into the traffic control plan to be prepared for each roadway segment. Traffic control plans should be coordinated with the appropriate local jurisdiction and the County Sanitation Districts should attempt to comply with the traffic control requirements as identified by the local jurisdictions to the maximum extent possible. tw II-37 i H. NOISE 1. Existing Conditions v The existing noise environments along the alignments proposed in the Master Plan for District 5 and the south half of District 6 are dominated by noise emissions from local vehicular traffic and aircraft, along with police helicopters, stationary sources, and various transient sources associated with general community activi- ties. Hourly noise levels in the residential areas of Newport Beach, such as along Bayside Drive, on Balboa Peninsula, in Cameo Shores, and at Crystal Cove, range from 48 to 63 decibals (A-weighted scale) . (12) Higher levels of 60 to 65 dB CNEL occur along major arterials and highways such as Pacific Coast Highway. (2) w Sensitive noise receptors are hospitals, schools, residential areas, and libraries located along or near the proposed alignments. See the Land Use section for a discussion of these areas. 2. Impacts Rehabilitation and construction activities resulting from implemen- tation of the proposed Master Plan will cause short term noise level increases in the vicinity of the activities. Once construction is completed, noise levels will revert to existing ambient conditions. Although implementation of the Master Plan is scheduled to occur over several years, individual construction activities are carried in relative stages and would not remain at fixed locations for extended time periods. i W There are a variety of construction equipment and machinery to be used in the rehabilitation projects. They include: jackhammers, r 12. Lindstrom, K. P. & Associates, 1979. i 2. Sawyer, Frederick G., Phillips Brandt & Reddick, Inc., 1981. II-38 goo backhoes, bulldozers, front loaders, compressors, compactors, graders, and paving equipment. Noise level ranges associated with this equipment are shown in Figure II-5. With the replacement of more efficient motors and pumping equipment, reduced noise levels would be expected to emanate from the existing stations. Long-term impacts associated with the newly constructed pump station (Crystal Cove) will result in increased noise levels but will comply with noise ordinance limitations by the appropriate agency. 3. Mitigation Measures o Construction and rehabilitation activities should be limited to normal daylight work hours and workdays. o Construction activities will comply with all applicable noise ordinances. o Noise attenuation devices should be used on all motorized construction equipment along with appropriate use and proper maintenance of the equipment. I. VISUAL RESOURCES 1. Existing Conditions The visual resources in the project area vary from open space- industrial land use near the Santa Ana River, to urbanization in too Newport Beach, to primarily open space land use south of Corona del Mar. The coastline and Pacific Ocean are visible predominantly along Pacific Coast Highway between. Corona del Mar and Crystal Cove. In general, the overall aesthetic quality of the project area is considered to be quite high. MW II-39 i NOISE LEVEL(dBA) AT 50 FT 60 70 80 90 100 110 COMPACTORS (ROLLERS) H y FRONT LOADERS us Z BACKHOES W O Z TRACTORS F � m W SCRAPERS, GRADERS V PAVERS H r, J TRUCKS o CONCRETE MIXERS m = CONCRETE PUMPS I4 ` C �A W J cc W ¢ CRANES (MOVABLE) CRANES (DERRICK) H uJ PUMPS p Q GENERATORS W F N COMPRESSORS W r- z PNEUMATIC WRENCHES E--{ Q W V oQ. a JACK HAMMERS AND ROCK DRILLS Lu PILE DRIVERS PEAKS) VIBRATORLu ; H o SAWS NOTE: BASED ON LIMITED AVAILABLE DATA SAMPLES SOURCE: EPA, 1971:'NOISE FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS, BUILDING EQUIPMENT, AND HOME APPLIANCES. NTID3000.1 NOISE RANGES-CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FIGURE II-6 '�' 2. Impacts two Visual impacts from machinery, trenching, and dirt pilings will occur where sewer construction is located. The primary impacts from construction will be short-term, for the duration of construction. Typically, construction occurs on one-mile segments for about one month. Crystal Cove Area. Construction would be visible to residents of Crystal Cove. Views of the construction area from Pacific Coast Highway would be blocked by existing topography. Dal Pacific Coast Highway Between Crystal Cove and Cameo Shores. Construction would be visible from Pacific Coast Highway. ,=, Cameo Shores Area. Construction in the housing tract would be U-" visible to residents on Milford Road, Cameo Shores Road and on numerous cross streets. Views of the construction of the 15-inch 6.0 gravity line along the coastal bluff southeast of Cameo Shores by residents would be blocked by the existing embankment paralleling co, Cameo Shores Road. This construction area could possibly be seen from Pacific Coast Highway. Bayside Drive Area. Construction would be visible from residential and commercial land uses along Bayside Drive. Pacific Coast Highway Between Bay Bridge Pump Station and Santa Ana f6' Rivers. Construction would be visible from commercial and residential uses along and above the roadway, such as along Cliff Drive. Views of construction from other uses (e.g. , Hoag Hospital) located above Pacific Coast Highway would be somewhat screened by the bluffs below them. Construction on the oil development property northeast of the Santa Ana River would be visible from residential areas along 62nd Street, Canal Street, and possibly from the Newport Crest condominium development located southwest of Superior Avenue just north of Pacific Coast Highway. Views of construction from the II-40 i Cal iw northern ends of 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, and 19th Streets are either blocked by existing topography or are too far away. This area already is a highly impacted visual resource due to existing oil development operations. Balboa Peninsula. Construction would be visible from commercial and residential uses along Newport and Balboa Boulevards. �+ 3. Mitigation Measures o Landscaping programs will be coordinated with sewer construction projects to re-establish landscaped areas impacted by construction. o Excess earth will be removed from areas of sewer construction, or be recontoured in conjunction with relandscaping programs. o Excavation in slope areas should be conducted with minimal grading of slopes. Revegetation of disturbed areas should commence immediately after project completion. J. UTILITIES 1. Existing Conditions Various agencies and companies provide water, sewer, electricity, gas, and telephone services to the project area, as described below. Water: Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) provides services to the unincorporated area between Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove. The City of Newport Beach Utilities Department provides water for the project area located within city limits. Service lines of these agencies are located in proximity to proposed alignments. II-41 mo Sewer: IRWD also provides sewage collection services in the unincorporated area between Cameo Shores and Crystal Cove. The City of Newport Beach Utilities Department provides collection services to the project area located within city limits. The County m Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSOOC) provide trunk line collection facilities which receive sewage from the IRWD and City of Newport Beach collection systems and transport it to their treatment facilities in Fountain Valley. IRWD and City of Newport Beach sewer lines are tributary to the CSDOC trunk lines, and as such are located in the vicinity of the proposed project. Electricity: Southern California Edison Company provides electricity for the entire project area. Underground cables are two located near the proposed improvements. Gas: Southern California Gas Company provides gas for the entire WV project area. At least one and sometimes two high pressure transmission mains are located in Pacific Coast Highway between the "' Santa Ana River and the Crystal Cove area. Distribution lines also occur which parallel the transmission mains. Localized gas lines �' occur perpendicular to Balboa and Newport Boulevards on Balboa Peninsula. A gas main also occurs for the length of Bayside Drive ftw from Pacific Coast Highway to Marguerite. Other service lines are located in Brighton Road and Milford Drive in Cameo Shores. am Telephone: Telephone services are provided by Pacific Telephone Company in the entire project area. 2. Impacts MW Water: IRWD and the City of Newport Beach do not anticipate any wv impacts to their facilities resulting from implementation of the Master Plan. Prior to actual construction, both IRWD and the City CPU of Newport Beach should be contacted in advance in order to accurately locate infrastructure in the field. II-42 i r� Sewer: IRWD does not anticipate any impacts to its existing or future facilities in the Irvine Coast area south of Cameo Shores. IRWD will supply collection services to future planned development, and then distribute collected sewage to the trunk line planned as a part of the proposed project. The City of Newport Beach will be benefited by the rehabilitation of the Balboa Pensinsula trunk due to a reduction of the dry weather surcharge problem now caused by seawater infiltration. Other Newport Beach infrastructure could possibly be affected by project construction, and will be specifically located prior to actual construction. CSDOC facilities will be benefited by the proposed project by rehabilitating existing facilities, thus improving their reliability and efficiency. Also beneficial, the construction of new facilities will provide for projected capacity increases. Electricity: No adverse impacts on SCE facilities or services are anticipated. Project implementation will have the positive impact of decreasing electrical consumption by reducing pumping requirements with increased motor and pumping efficiency. Prior to actual construction, SCE's infrastructure's specific locations will be obtained from SCE in order to prevent any construction impacts. r.r Gas: No impacts on SCG's facilities or services are anticipated. Prior to actual construction, SCG's infrastructure's specific locations will be obtained from SCG in order to prevent any construction impacts. Telephone: No impacts on Pacific Telephone's facilities or services are anticipated. Prior to actual construction, Pacific Telephone's infrastructure's specific locations will be obtained from Pacific Telephone in order to prevent any construction impacts. II-43 w 3. Mitigation Measures o Each of the affected utility companies will be contacted prior to project implementation to coordinate respective planning efforts. o To the extent possible, other utility facilities will not be interrupted during project construction. o A check for existing locations will be made prior to final route locations. o CSDOC will comply with the Department of Health and Safety's criteria for separation of water mains and sanitary sewers. K. COSTAEVENUE ANALYSIS(7) 1. Pump Station Maintenance With the exception of the Bay Bridge Pump Station which was constructed in 1966, all of the pump stations serving the study area have been in service since the 1930's and are operating at capacity. Maintenance generally requires replacement or modernization of existing equipment and the estimated cost of each pump station is as follows: "A" Street $ 23,600 14th Street 18,600 Lido 38,000 Rocky Point 22,500 Bitter Point 21,800 Total Cost $1 24,500 too fto bump 7. Shaller & Lohr Inc. 1983. No II-44 2. South Coast Development The Irvine South Coast Development is represented by Drainage Areas P1, P2, P3 and P4 on the Land Use Map (Figure II-2) . The Irvine Company's Land Use and Circulation Plan as approved by Orange County indicates development in County Sanitation District 5 will include 2,373 acres of low density and 180 acres of high density housing totaling 3,148 units. Commercial development of 96 acres is also proposed. Completion of the proposed Bayside Drive Extension by the Districts will provide an outlet for the sewer network serving Irvine South Coast. The extension of the Coast Highway system, as well as the anticipated tributary trunk lines in Buck Gulley and Los Trancos Canyon will be constructed under agreements to be negotiated with developers and financed by connection charges from the Districts �+ South Coast Zone 3. It is anticipated that the local sewage facilities to be designed and constructed as part of the proposed development will be operated and maintained by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The proposed trunk sewers force mains and pump stations that are included in the South Coast portion of the District 5 Master Plan will be financed by connection charges. The total projected cost of these facilities is estimated as follows: woo bw II-45 �w end Facility A. Reconstruction of Cameo Shores Pump Station $ 350,000 extension of the existing 15-inch City line to the westerly boundary of the proposed State Park and installation of a force main to Pacific Coast Highway B. Extension of Bayside Drive Trunk gravity line from 1,500,000 the abandoned Bayside Drive Pump Station to the cod Corona del Mar Pump Station C. Construction of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 3002000 am D. Construction of 7,550 lineal feet of 24-inch 565,000 gravity line and 2,800 lineal feet of force main between Crystal Cove Pumping Station and the W, Corona del Mar Pump Station E. Construction of an 18-inch gravity line from the 150,000 �, westerly limit of The Irvine Company's proposed 375 acre tract to the proposed Crystal Cove Pumping Station Total Cost, including Engineering and Contingencies $2,865,000 3. Connection Fees The sewage connection fees currently charged for new construction in col Zone 1 of District 5 are $250 per dwelling unit and $130 per 1,000 square feet for commercial buildings. ew The estimated number of ultimate dwelling units, i.e., 3,148 is, am however, subject to revision due to possible changes in current development philosophy or annexations to the District. In order to provide for adequate funding and to allow for planning revisions, WW the total number of estimated dwelling units should be conserva- tively reduced for calculation of connection fees. Assuming a 25% °" reduction, the number of dwelling units would be reduced to 2,361. Assuming a 30% building area factor for the 96 acres of commercial area, there would be, however, 652 additional Equivalent Dwelling Units for a total of 3,013 units for the proposed residential and O, commercial development. Dividing 3,013 into the total cost of proposed sewage facilities results in an additional connection bw charge requirement of approximately $951 per dwelling unit. II-46 i Based on these calculations and considering contingencies, engineering, etc., the range of the projected connection charges should be: Residential $1,200 to $1,500 per unit Commercial $2,000 to $2,500 per 1000 sq.ft. of building area 4. Cost Estimates �+ Table II-3 summarizes the estimated construction costs and , scheduling for the rehabilitation and new District projects. Table II-4 summarizes the estimated installation costs and preliminary scheduling for the projects necessitated by the development of the South Coast. . w bud WW a.+ I I-47 `'� TABLE I I-3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT NO. 6 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR RECOMMENDED FACILITIES ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST A. REHABILITATION PROJECTS Total Cost 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1 . Phase_ I - Coast Trunk Lido Pump Station to $450,000 $450,000 Valve at Sewer Station 93 + 50 Phase II - Coast Trunk $ 500, 000 (b) $ 500, 000 Rocky Point to Dover Drive Phase III - Coast Trunk $ 500,000 (b) $500, 000 Station 93 + 50 to Bitter Point Pump Station Phase IV - Coast Trunk $ 500, 000(b) $500 , 000 Bitter Point Pump Station to Santa Ana River Phase V - Coast Trunk $1 , 500,000(b) $750,000 $750,000 Rocky Point to Santa Ana River 2. Balboa Trunk $2, 500, 000(a) $-00 ,000 $11000,000 $1 ,000,000 B. NEW DISTRICT PROJECTS Bayside Drive $1 , 000,000(a) $1 ,000,000 Bayside Drive Trunk $1 , 500, 000(a) $750 ,000 $750,000 C . PUMPING STATION RECONSTRUCTION Bay Bridge Pumping $400,000(a) $400,000 TOTAL $8 , 850, 000 $2, 350,000 $1 , 250,000 $1 , 250,000 2, 250, 000 $1 , 750,000 * *To be partially financed by Lower Coast Connection Fee. Construction contingent upon Zone 3 development (a ) District 5 Only (b) District 5 & 6 TABLE II-4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT NO. 6 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR RECOMMENDED FACILITIES NECESSITATED BY SOUTH COAST DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST A. REQUIRED FACILITIES Total. Cost 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1.. Cameo Shores Pump $350,000{`-I) $350, 000 Station and Extension of Existing City Line to State Park 2. Extension of Coast $565, 000 (a) $565, 000 Trunk from Corona del Mar Pump Station to the proposed Crystal Cove Pump Station 3. Crystal Cove Pump $300,000 (a) $300,000 Station 4 . Extension of South $150,000(a) $100,000 $50 ,000 Coast Trunk from Crystal Cove Pump Station Limits of. South Coast Development TOTAL $1 , 365,000 -0- $350,000 $865, 000 $100,000 $50,000 GRAND TOTAL $1 , 365,000 ( �}Dist.ri.ct. 5 Only am III. ALTERNATIVES am fto The environmental impacts associated with the proposed sewage system rehabilitation and construction actions have been described in Section II of this EIR. Alternative alignments and locations for construction of new and rehabilitated facilities have been reviewed by the CSDOC. These alignments and pump station locations are shown in Figure I-2 of this report. A. NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE This alternative entails the continued use of the existing sewer two collection systems in District 5 and the south half of District 6 without the modernization, repair and new construction required to maintain sewer services and provide capacity to service County approved development along the South Coast. two If the deficiencies in the present collection sytems as evaluated in the Master Plan are not eliminated, impacts are as follows: o The reliability of the entire sewage system could be ,jeopardized. o If flows exceed design capacities, untreated sewage could back up onto streets and ultimately be discharged into the ocean. o The existing systems will remain highly susceptible to sulfide deterioration and possible line failure. o Intrusion of salt water into the system will continue to incur substantial costs for pumping and treatment of sewage flow. o Accommodation of existing and adjacent development cannot continue without rehabilitation and construction of the existing sewage system. .. III-1 o Econcmic development and population growth in the study area could be significantly impacted . The "No Project" alternative is considered to be not feasible because of the potential for sewage line failure and violation of waste discharge standards and not meeting anticipated planned growth. In addition, federal, State and regional regulations require that adequate sewage facilities exist to protect the public health of the community. III-2 IV. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY too In the short-term, temporary environmental impacts and consumption of some materials will occur during the rehabilitation and construction of the sewage disposal systems. These short-term, localized impacts will be on traffic circulation systems, air quality, noise levels, land use activities and visual resources. Short-term benefits will result from additional employment opportunities. Long-term benefits will result from implementation of the project by improving the reliability of the sewage collection systems and enhancing the 'oo economic viability of the District's service areas by accommodating existing and planned growth. IV-1 V. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION By implementing the rehabilitation and construction of the proposed sewage collection systems, environmental changes produced will be localized and short-term in nature. Once facility construction is completed, no significant irreversible changes will result. The proposed project, however, will accommodate planned development which in turn would result in a long-term commitment of land, construction materials, energy resources, and public utilities. d '"" V-1 m VI. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION The proposed project has been designed to correct existing deficiencies in the sewage collection systems, improve its reliability, and to enable the men CSDOC to accommodate planned growth and development in patterns approved by appropriate jurisdictions. The additional capacities created by new construction and the rehabilitation of sewage collection and pumping facilities are consistent with adopted plans and will not be growth inducing. VI-1 m VII. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Adverse impacts resulting from the rehabilitation, construction and operation of the proposed Master Plan improvements are both short-term and long-term in duration and have direct and indirect effects. Following is a summary of those unavoidable adverse impacts which may occur with the incorporation of mitigation measures discussed in this report. TOPOGRAPHY/SOILS/GEOLOGY During a seismic event, all sewage facilities will be subject to ground shaking. Short-term landform alterations will result from construction activities but this is not considered to be significant. LUZ HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY No significant adverse impacts are expected. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES m Because of the nature and locations of the rehabilitation and construction activities in previously disturbed areas, no significant long-term adverse impacts are anticipated. In the Newport Bay area, Cameo Shores area and the Crystal Cove area, potential impacts to —i estuarine and vegetative resources will be properly mitigated. AIR QUALITY Fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions will have a localized, short-term impact on air quality. Because of improvements in the energy efficiencies in the new and modernized facilities, air-quality impacts will be reduced on a long-term basis. ,.e VII-1 . rr CULTURAL RESOURCES No adverse significant impacts are anticipated. LAND USE/RELEVANT PLANS bog Short-term and possible significant disruptions to adjacent land uses may be expected during rehabilitation and construction of sewage collection facilities. Long-term adverse impacts relate to the commitment of land for facility easements. These impacts are not considered to be significant. TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION Short-term adverse impacts may be expected to disrupt normal traffic patterns during construction and rehabilitation of the sewage facilities. The significance of this impact will be reduced by incorporation of recommended mitigation measures. NOISE r Short-term increases in localized ambient noise levels will be experienced during sewage facility construction and rehabilitation activities. These impacts, though short-term, may be significant. VISUAL RESOURCES During construction, visual impacts will be of short-term duration and ` are not expected to be significant. UTILITIES No adverse impacts are anticipated. VII-2 VIII. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 'ow All potential impacts associated with the implementaton of the Master Plan sewage collection system rehabilitation and construction have been evaluated xW in this EIR. General conclusions regarding the potential significance of these impacts have also been described. No impacts were omitted from this evaluation to ensure that this EIR provided a full disclosure of potential environmental effects as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , CSDOC and State EIR guidelines. VIII-1 9=9, IX. ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED '9w A. ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED dw County Sanitation Districts of Thomas M. Dawes Orange County Hilary Baker City Of Newport Beach Planning Department Fred Talarico Pat Temple Orange County Environmental Management Bill Melton Agency Ken Winter Irvine Ranch Water District Steve Malloy Southern California Gas Company Jan Johnson Southern California Association of John Oshimo Governments (SCAG) B. EIR PREPARERS Envirosphere Company Project Manager Harold S. Schneider ® Environmental Research and Analysis George Fitzpatrick Angela McDonald c, R. John Little Kunzman amd Associates William Kunzman Archeological Resource Management Ccorp. Marie Cottrell �, IX-1 m X. BIBLIOGRAPHY Barter, Eloise Richards. 1983. CA-Ora 130 and CA-Ora 323: 1982 California Department of Parks and Recreation Excavations. In Coastal Bluff Sites at Crystal Cove State Park, State of California Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation. California Native Plant Society. 1980. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants. Special Publication No. 1, 2nd Edition. Cottrell, Marie, et al. 1983. CA-Ora 130: A Multi-component Campsite Located on the Coastal Bluffs of the Southern California Coast. In Coastal Bluff Sites at Crystal Cove State Park, State of California, Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation. Culbertson, Adams & Associates, Inc. 1983. Draft EIR, Carnation Project; General Plan Amendment 83-2 Prepared for the City of Newport Beach. Dixon, P.S. and G.A. Marsh. 1973. Ecological Survey of Aquatic and Terrestrial Resources for City of Newport Beach. Hall, Matthew C. 1975. Santa Ana River Project Description and Evaluation Cultural Resources Appendices: Field Data. By Archeological Research Unit, University of California, Riverside, for U.S. Army Corps of '¢ Engineers, Los Angeles District. ucis Jones and Stokes. 1976. Irvine Coastal Community General Plan Amendment EIR and Project Report. Larry Seeman Associates, Inc. 1981. Draft EIR, General Plan Amendment 80-3. Prepared for City of Newport Beach. Larry Seeman Associates, Inc. 1983. Draft EIR, Castaways Planned Community. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach. Vols. I and II. X-1 i u BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued) Lindstrom, K.P. & Associates. 1979. Final EIR, Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer Replacement and Repair Project. Prepared for County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California. Phillips Brandt Reddick, Inc. 1982. Draft EIR, City of Newport Beach; General Plan Amendment 81-2. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach. Sawyer, Frederick G., Phillips Brandt Reddick, Inc. 1981. Final EIR, Banning-Newport Ranch; General Plan Amendment 81-1. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach. Shalle r & Lahr Inc. 1979. Facility Report for Pump Station "A", County Sanitation District No. 5, Orange County. Shaller & Lahr Inc. 1983. Master Plan Report for Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 and the South Half of County Sanitation District No. 6. South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality for 1978, 1979, 1980, and 1981. State Coastal Conservancy. 1982. Regional Wetland Restoration Study: Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Final Draft Report. Wei State of California Division of Mines & Geology. 1973. Geoenvironmental Maps of Orange County, California. Preliminary Report 15. Plate 3: r+ Fault Activity and Earthquake Epicenter Map. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1978. Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California. U.S. Department of Transportation, et al. 1975. Final EIS, Replacement of Upper Newport Bay Bridge, Pacific Coast (Route 1) Highway in the City of Newport Beach. X-2 dw BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued) uld U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, State of California Department of Transportation, City of Newport Beach. 1983. 'w Draft EIS, Pacific Coast Highway Improvement Project: Proposed Improvement of Traffic Flow along Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1) from m, MacArthur Boulevard (Route 73) to Newport Boulevard (Route 55), City of Newport Beach, Orange County, California. m Van Horn, David. 1980. Archeological Posthole Testing Report: CA-Ora 148 and Ora 843, on Mobil Oil Land, Near Costa Mesa, Orange County, California. Van Horn, David. 1979. Archeological Survey Report: Mobil Oil Land, Near Costa Mesa, in County of Orange, California. and W, X-3 LM APPENDIX A Md • Notice of Preparation • Initial Study • Responses tow bw bow Imw Law aw bmi ind COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ! � All[A COO[71• C1\' 60-2910 As Specified b Section OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 15103 (Response to Notice Of Preparation) of .� 96= �41t the state of California SIR Guidelines be received no later than 45 days after the yreceipt our pofsthisould notice. Hilary Baker (714) 540-2910 of the County Sanitation Districts of P.C.6DX 9127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 927CO Orange County is available to respond to any questions you may have. 113844 ELLIS AVENUE(EUCLID OFF-RAMP.BAN DIEDD FREEWAY) December 22, 1983 Oau^ei NOTICE OF PREPARATION T omas M. Duxes Deputy Chief Engineer SuB,;ECT: Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for TMD/jb County Sanitation District No. 5 and South Half of District No. 6 To Whom It May Concern: County Sanitation Districts No. 5 and 6 of Orange County have authorized preparation of an Environmental Impact Report to assess the impact of the rehabilitation and construction of sewage collection systems in District 5 and the south half of District 6. The nrepesed project will provide modernization and repair required to maintain sewer services as well as provide capacity to service planner: :ounty- approved South Coast development. In order to obtain timely input from affected agencies and other interested parties Early in the EIR process, this "Notice of Preparation" is being distributed in accor- dance with Sections 15082 (Determination of Scope of EIR) and 15083 (Early Public Consultation) of the State of California EIR GIiiJell:es (July i983). This EIl is intended to address the impacts of the rehabilitation and �:onstruction of facilities as Indicated on the attached map. The zoope of the EIR and the issues likely to be important are des�:r;bA in Exnibit I. The short-term impacts of construction as well as the long-term impacts of operation, including secondary growth implica- tions will be addressed. The impact discussion will provide the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County with a sound basis far determining whether the proposed facilities are appropriate. It is requested that you specifically note any special interest that you or your agency may have regarding operations within the project area (e.g. permit requirements, project review requirements) as they may be affected by the proposed project. To assist you in Identifying your special concerns or interests, a form listing subjects to be described in the SIR is attached as Exhibit I1. Please return the completed form with your response. If we do not receive your response, we will assume that the proposed project will not affect your agency and that you do not wish to be retained on our Distribu- tion list to receive the Draft EIR. EXHIBIT I d. Coast Trunk: Slip-line, parallel or reconstruction of 27-in. MASTER PLAN FOR DISTRICT NO. 5 AND THE SOUTHERN HALF OF DISTRICT NO.6 line etween Bitter Point Pump Station and Santa Ana River (Phase IV). e. Coast Trunk: Possible reconstruction of 24-in. force main on Protect Status north side of Pacific Coast Highway between Rocky Point Pump Station and Santa Ana River (Phase V). The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County have determined that 2. New Construction Program several facilities in Districts 5 and the southern half of District 6 are in need of repair and rehabilitation. Some trunk sewers lack auf- a. Ba Brid a Pum Station - Upgrade of pumping capacity; modlfi- fioient capacity to meet existing demands and others must be repaired cat on of exiaL ng facility; possible construction of standby in order to maintain adequate sewage collection services. In addi- tion, several pump stations require modernization. Other facilities power n and valve reconstruction of 27-in. connection between must be constructed on an as-needed basis to meet demands projected by station and valve vault. agencies with planning jurisdiction. The County Sanitation Districts b. Ba side Drive Trunk Parallel - Parallel of 18-in. section with of Orange County are planning to rectify deficiencies in the systems newaction. of Districts No. 5 and 6 through the rehabilitation and construction of the facilities addressed 1n this Environmental Impact Report. a, Ba aide Drive Trunk Extension - Construction of 24-in. eaten- s on rom a an one aysi a rive Pump Station to Corona del Location and Description of Protect Mar Pump Station. T a Count d. Balboa Peninsula - Preparation of Facilities Plan Report to The project area is located in central coastal Orange y, address the problem of salt water intrusion as well as the generally south of the Santa Ana River and north of Crystal Cove along extent of deterioration and general conditions of the City of the Pacific Coast. The specific location of the proposed facilities, Newport Beach's collector system. It is anticipated that ye- as well as existing facilities are indicated on the attached map. construction and rehabilitation of the Balboa Trunk will The Raster Plan Report defines the improvements necessary to eliminate indeed occur in the future. deficiencies in the project area's sewage collection systems. The Report also establishes a priority schedule for recommended rehabill- 3. Pump Station Maintenance tation and construction of sewage facilities consistent with CSDOC financial capabilities and sewer service obligations. a. "A" Street Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. The Master Plan Report proposes the following improvements: b. 14th Street Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. 1. Rehabilitation Projects a. Lido Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. a. Balboa Peninsula Trunk: Parallel of 16-1n. line and parallel d. Hooky Point Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. or a p- ine o n. line between Lido Pump Station and Pacific Coast Highway (Phase I). e. Bitter Point Pump Station - Replacement of old equipment. b. Coast Trunk: Reconstruction of 33-in. line between Rocky Point Pump Station and Bay Bridge Pump Station (Phase II). 4. South Coast Development a. Coast Trunk: Slip-11ne or parallel of 27-in. line between a. Cameo Shores Pum Station - Reconstruction of existing city eninsu a runk and Bitter Point Pump Station (Phase III). owne pump atit on. b. Cameo Shores Force Main - Construction of force main between Cameo Shores Pump Stat on and Coast Trunk. The Irvine Company Pacific Coast Archaeological Southern California Association California Coastal Commission Lipper Newport Bay Advisory Com. Corona Del Mar Chamber of 550 Newport Center Drive Society, Inc. of Governments 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 c/o Dept. of Fish and Game Commerce Newport Beach, CA 92660 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 60D S. Commonwealth Avenue P.O. Box 1450 350 Golden Shore Luvena Hayton, Pres. Attn: Property Management Attn: Laura Lee Mitchell Suiten1000 CA 90005 Long Beach, CA 90801 Long Beach, CA 90802 2855 E. Coast Highway Los Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Plans and Prof. Evaluation Unit California Coastal Commission Library/Documents Section Friends of OASIS J. M. Peters BEECD, Ltd. Air Resources Board 631 Howard Street Calif. State Unly. Fullerton Box 029 Attn: Bob Trapp John Haskell 1102 Q Street Fourth Floor P.O. Box 4150 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 1601 Dove Street 3990 Westerly Place, SUlte 255 P.O. Box 2815 San Francisco, CA 94105 Fullerton, Co 92634 Suite 190 Box 1028 Sacramento, CA 95812 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92663 U.C.I. Library - Govt. Publ. Newport Beach Public Library Newport Beach Public Library Hoag Memorial Hospital Emkay Development Chris Hansen P.O. Box 19557 Balboa Branch Corona del Mar Branch Michael Stevens 1301 Dove Street 22 Encore Court Irvine, CA 92713 100 East Balboa Boulevard 420 Marigold Avenue 301 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Balboa, Ca 92661 Corona del Mar, Ca 92625 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach Public Library Newport Beach Public Library M.W.O.O.C. West Newport Legislative Allian. Nick del Cloppo Patrick G. Nevis Mariners Branch Newport Center Branch 525 Carbillo Park Drive 201 Intrepid Street Office of Historic Preserva. Dept. of Conservation 2005 Dover Drive 856 San Clemente Drive Suite 124 Newport Beach, CA 92663 1220 K Street Mall, Third Floor 1416 Ninth Street, Rm 1354 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Santa Ana, CA 927054229 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 State Water Quality Control Brd. State Clearinghouse South Coast Air Quality Wm. Lowing Fred Lercorl Department of Fish 8 Game Santa Ana Region Office of Planning and Research Management District Pacific Telephone Company State Water Resources Control 1416 Ninth Street 6833 Indiana 1700 Tenth St. 9150 E. Flair Drive 3160 Redhlll Ave. Board Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92506 Sacramento, Ca 95814 E1 Monte. CA 91731 Room 1042125 19th Street Attn: John Turner Costs Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: Brian Farris Sacramento, CA 95014 California Dept. of Fish 6 Came County of Orange Irvine Ranch Water District Dept. of Health services Dave Williamson State of California Environmental Services Environmental Management Agency 16802 Bardeen Avenue 28 Civic Center Plaza Dept. of Housing/Community Dev. Air Resources Board 350 Golden Shore Adv. Plaming/Envtl. Svcs. Irvine, Ca 92716-6025 Room 1850 921 10th Street, 6th Floor Box 2815 Long Beach, CA 90802 P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Gary Agid U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service City of Newport Beach City of Newport Beach Airport Land Use Commission State of California Water Resources Conservation 24000 Avila Road Planning Department Public Works Department 10741 North Airport Way State Lands Commission Board Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 3300 Newport Boulevard 3300 Newport Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92702 1807 13th Street 1416 Ninth Street Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beech, CA 92663 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Ted Fukushima Daily Pilot The Register Irvine Mirror Parks 8 Recreation Dept. James Tryner Dave Maul 330 West Day Street 625 North Grand Avenue 330 West Bay Street 1416 Ninth Street Dept. of Parks 6 recreation California Energy Commission Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 I4th Floor 1220 K Street Mall, 3rd Floor 1111 Howe Ave., Room 3318 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95625 Caltrans City of Costa Mesa Costa Mesa Sanitary District Marty Mercado Energy Resources Conservation Bob Sleppy District 07 Planning Division 77 Fair Drive Dept. of Boating 6 Waterways 8 Development Commission Solid waste Management Board 120 South Spring Street 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 1629 S Street 1111 Howe Street 1020 Ninth Street, Room 300 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95825 Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Kenneth Steele Mesa Consolidated Water Dist. City of Irvine Friends of Newport Bay State Water Resources Control Ken Fellows Fred A. Worthley, Jr. Engineering Department Planning Services P.O. Box 2001 Board Dept. of Water Resources Regional Manager 1965 Placentia Avenue 2801 McSow Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92663 Box 100 1416 Ninth Street Department of Fish and Come Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Irvine, CA 92715 Sacramento, CA 95801 Sacramento, CA 95814 350 Golden Shore Attn: Harry M. Schueller Long Beach, CA 90802 See and Sage Audubon Society Stop Polluting Our Newport Orange County Water District Harbor District Environmental Coalition of Orange County Chapter /4 Harbor Island P.O. Box 8300 1901 Bayside Drive Orange County 666 Darrell Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 206 W. 4th Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Santa Ana, CA 92701 1rvine Unified Schoc_' Dist=lct League of Women Voters of NIWA 2941 Alton Avenue Orange Coast Area 400 W. Civic Center Drive Irvine, CA 92714 ao' Snug Harbor Road Santa Ana, CA 92702 Nexport Beach, CA 92663 Attn: Bob Collacutt Newport-Mesa Unified School Audubon Society City of Costa Mesa District Sea 6 Sage Chapter 77 Fair Drive 1857 Placentia Avenue P.O. Box 1779 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Coast Community College Sierra Club City of Irvine 1370 Adans Avenue Orange County Group P.O. Box 14575 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P.O. Box 5367 Irvine, CA 92713 Fullerton, CA 92635 Southern California Gas Co. Clerk of the Board of City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 3334 Supervisors 2000 Main Street Anaheim, CA 92603 P.O. Box 687 Huntington Beach, CA 926, Attn: W. R. Perkins Santa Ana, CA 92702 Pacific Bell Southern Calif. Edison Co. The Kull Company 3939 E. Coronado 7333 Bolsa Avenue 4490 Van Kerman Avenue 1st Floor Westminster, CA 92683 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Anaheim, CA 92807 Attn: W. E. Guffey Attn: M.J. MoC.ard, Eng. Iaison Teleprompter Friends of the Irvine Coast LEAF 901 W. 16th Street P.O. Box 714 c/o Jean Watt Newport Beach, CA 92663 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 4 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dept. of Boating i waterways 1629 S Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: M. If. Ivers, Director ddW '9# 57��� - c. Crystal Cove Puma Station - Construction of new pump station d. Coast Trunk Extension - Construction of new force main and -in. gray ty line in or adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway; parallel or replacement of existing 15-in. line in Pacific Coast Highway with 24-in. line; these lines to be built be- tween Corona del Har and proposed Crystal Cove Pump Stations. a � e. Cr stal Cova Extension - Construction of 18-in. gravity line rom xesterly m t o the Irvine Company's proposed 375 acre tract to Crystal Cove Pump Station. r i e Probable Environmental Effects The probable environmental impacts of the proposed projectinclude ad and c J1 [� short-term physical effects caused by rehabilitation and construction, � (1 It I long term effects of project operation, and indirect impacts generated by projected planned growth that will be accommodated by the proposed project. A summary of probable environmental effects is outlined in i the attached Initial Study. r kc Qo / §Io= S �� x 1 ,; ' EXHIBIT II. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE CATEGORIES NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM Please indicate your interests and items that should be addressed in the proposed EIR. Category Comments This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice GEOLOGY/SOILS of Preparation. If more space is required or if you prefer a different format, please feel free to deviate trom this form as necessary. If you have input, please complete the form and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft EIR. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY Agency Mailing address City State Zip VEGETATION/WILDLIFE • Telephone ( ) Contact Person ARCHAEOLOGY/HISTORY La•'VEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. [_] No interest (delete from distribution list) Q Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES [__1 Major interest (state key areas of your concern): RELEVANT LAND USE PLANNING PERMIT/REVIEW REQUIREMENTS Do .you or your agency have statutory permit authority or DEMOGRAPHY AND GROWTH DYNAMICS advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT AREA. If so, please list. Applicability Within Area of Concern Authority Project Area TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION fl fl. i Q i i i i fl fl B i i fl i i fl fl fl UOUNIY JANITATION UISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA • P.O.Box Bill Category IOiu BLUS AYINUI Comments FOUNTAIN VALLBY,CALOORNIA qla put laaano CLIMATE/AIR QUALITY m.I+Bla.n INITIAL STUDY NOISE (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) I. Background • r UTILITIES A. Name of Proponent County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent P. 0. Box 8127, 10844 El Ifs Avenue, Fountain Valley, California 92708 (714) 540 - 2910 ENERGY CONSERVATION C. Contact Person Hilary Baker 0. Title and Location of Project Master Plan Update for District 5 and South Half of District 6 of the Orange County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California E. Description of Project Rehabilitation of existing trunk sewers and pump stations (Coast Trunk, Bayside Trunk Parallel, Balboa Trunk; "A" Street, 14th Street, Lido, Rocky Point, Bitter Point, Bay Bridge Pump Stations) and construction of new facilities (Bayside Drive Trunk Extension, Crystal Cove Pump Station, Cameo Shores Pump Station, Cameo Shores gravity line and _•• w_ force main, Coast Trunk Extension between Corona del Mar and proposed Crystal - Cove Pump Stations). 11. Guidelines Yes Ma a No 6. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28. sands or changes in silation, deposition erosionor which Yes X No of ariver orstream ordthe bed ofa the l ocean or any bay. inlet ar lake? X (if activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form.) 7. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, B. Does the project qualify as: mudslides, ground failure or similar X I. Ministerial (Section 6) Yes No X hazard? B. Air. Will the proposal result in: 2. Emergency (Section �3) Yes No X 1. Substantial air emissions or deteriora- X 3. A feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes No X tion of ambient air quality? 4. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines 2. The creation of objectionable odors? X (Section 40) Yes No X 3. Alteration of air r4vement, moisture or S. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency temperature or any change in climate, X (Section 36) Yes No X If yes, identify lead agency: either locally or regionally? C. Water. Will the proposal result in: (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need 1. Changes in currents or the course of not be prepared.) direction of water movements in either X marine or fresh water? III. Environmental Impacts 2. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of X (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached surface runoff? sheets.) 3. Alterations to the course or flow of Yes Maybe No flood waters? X A. Earth. Will the proposal result in: 4. Change in the amount of surface water X in any water body? 1. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X 5. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- 2. Disruptions, displacements, compaction cluding, but not limited to, temperature, X or overcovering of the soil? X dissolved oxygen or turbidity? 3. Change in topography or ground surface S. Alteration of the direction or rate X relief features? X of flow of ground waters? 4. The destruction, covering or modification 7. Change in the quantity of ground waters, of any unique geologic or physical features? X either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an X 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of aquifer by cuts or excavations? soils, either on or off the site? X -3- -2- H H H Q H H H H H H ff H H H H H H H H Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No B. Substantial reduction in the amount of H. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a water otherwise available for public substantial alteration of the present or water supplies? X planned land use of an area? X 9. Exposure of people or property to related I. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 1. Increase in the rate of use of any 0. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: natural resources? X 1. Change in the diversity of species or 2. Substantial depletion of any non- number of any species of plants (including renewable natural resource? X trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic 1 Plants)? X J. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, 1. A risk of an explosion or the release of rare or endangered species of plants? X hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals 3. Introduction of new species of plants into or radiation) in the event of an accident X an area or in a barrier to the normal X or upset conditions? replenishment of existing species? 2. Possible interference with an emergency 4. Reduction in acreage of any agriculture response plan or an emergency evacuation crop? X plan? X E. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: K. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth X 1. Change in the diversity of species or rate of the human population of an area? numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish L. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing and shellfish, benthic organisms or housing or create a demand for additional insects? X housing? X 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, X M. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal rare or endangered species of animals? result in: 3. Introduction of new species of animals 1. Generation of substantial additional into an area or result in a barrier to the X vehicular movement? X migration or movement of animals? 2. Effects on existing parking facilities 4. Deterioration to existing fish or X or demand for new parking? X wildlife habitat? 3. Substantial impact upon existing trans- F. Noise. Will the proposal result in: portation systems? X 1. Increase in existing noise levels? X 4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people 2. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X and/or goods? X G. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new S. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air light or glare? X traffic? X -4- -5- Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 2. Exposure of people to potential health 6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor hazards? X vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X R. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the N. Public Services. Will the proposal have an obstruction of any scenic vista or view open effect upon or result in a need for new or to the public or will the proposal result in altered governmental services in any of the the creation of an aesthetically offensive following areas: site open to public view? X 1. Fire protection? X S. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of 2. Police protection? X I. :existing recreational opportunities? X 3. Schools? X T. Cultural Resources. 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? X 1. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric X S. Maintenance of public facilities, in- X or historic archaeological site? cluding roads? 2. Will the proposal result 1n adverse 6. Other governmental services? X physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, X 0. Energy. Will the proposal result in: structure or object? 1. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or 3. Does the proposal have the potential to energy? X cause a physical change which would affect X unique ethnic cultural values? 2. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require 4. Will the proposal restrict existing the development of new sources of energy? X religious or sacred uses within the X potential impact area? P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to U. Mandatory Findings of Significance. the following utilities? 1. Does the project have the potential to 1. Power or natural gas? X degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a 2. Comrunications systems? X fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below 3. Water? X self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, 4. Sewer or septic tanks? X reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, S. Storm water drainage? X or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or X 6. Solids waste and disposal? X prehistory? Q. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 1. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X -7- -6- [_ LF [ _-- [ -- [- [ [ [- [ - ATTACHMENT A Yes Maybe No A.2 During the period of pipeline construction and rehabilitation, there will 2. Does the project have the potential to be temporary disruption, compaction and displacement of soil. achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term. environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is One 8.1 During the construction period, there may be temporary short-term deteri- which occurs in a relatively brief, de- oration of air quality at certain locations because of elevated dust X finitive period of time, while long-term q impacts will endure well into the future.) levels. Emissions from construction vehicles and equipment may contribute 3. Does the project have impacts which are to this deterioration. i individually limited but cumulative con- siderable? (A project may impact On two C.5 Runoff from construction sites could cause some erosion and increased sil- or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively tation of nearby water bodies. If dewatering is implemented during con- small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is X struction, there could be some additional discharge9 into the existing flood significant-) control system. 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial 0.1 Project construction activities could result in short-term loss of vegeta- adverse effects on human beings, X either directly or indirectly? Lion and subsequent loss of plant species diversity. IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation 0.2 Construction activities have the potential of reducing the number of unique, See attached sheet. (Attachment A) rare or endangered species of animals. V. Discussion of Zoning Compatibility 0.4 Construction activities could cause a temporary deterioration of existing See-attached-sheet. fish or wildlife habitats. VI. Determination (To be completed by Lead Agency.) M.4 Project construction has the potential for causing temporary but significant impacts On existing patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or on the basis of this initial evaluation:I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant goods. effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. M.6 Project construction activities could result in a short-ten increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation 0.2 The proposed project could result in some increase in the amounts of energy measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. consumed. ant onfthe environment dand ancENVIRONMENTALt MAY have a SIMPACTc effect REPORT P.4 The proposed project will result in substantial alternations to the existing is required. sewerage system. Date: DeOembe1 22, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of T.l Construction activities could result in an alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site. T[l[FNONIII i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �f �'� Aaz:o 7910. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ,62-2411 P. C. BOX 0127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92709 1CB44 ELLI9 AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAW @AN DIEGO FREEWAY) January 9, 1984 Nonstatutory Advisement of Preparation of An Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for County Sanitation District r 1 d No. 5 and South Half of District No. 6 `}}S- _ �\nT �I """ "►111 t�J t County Sanitation Districts No. 5 and 6 of Orange County have /'L o authorized preparation of an Environmental Impact Report to % t! "r.o�z � ll assess the impacts of the rehabilitation and construction of sewage collection systems in District No. 5 and the South Half of District No. 6. The proposed projects will provide moderni- zation and repair required to maintain existing sewer service as well as facilities to handle anticipated flows from planned �}U�� South Coast development. Any such development will be subject X, � �" �$ 1 to separate environmental assessment and appropriate City and County project and zoning approvals. �. „_ If you have concerns you would like to have addressed 1n the ;._ � :) �f- � Draft EIR or you wish to receive a copy when it is completed, please do not hesitate to contact Hilary Baker of our staff. r yr 5R :. fl H fl fl [ H fl H. H H fl H fl H [ fl H H fl =.'.4s=. r3/zz ov sure OF CAL"K.--oer+a or n.e 00VERN a etolee oeuweu..+.G . ' tom_3=t er Lmd AONK..7 -36a by awZle4own OFFICE OF RESOURCES. ENERGY. AND PERMIT ASSISTANCE ers G�tr 9i11 1 4r Rseoree ased Ost. of 30a tlat i C®me Ow'T. SAc.MINro.cA vsel, ia Q trer 71-Tom aTwe.sea scwO , sammm.CL 9eaL4 O Srrsmmm,Cl W14 91e/$G�10t sle/=-alra &Lrbksa tiered. Lorene lllaa OOeot. of aoatla4 i ftcnvara a.LLT1 lmaricm Raet=GN-- Ian I Srswe O 913 Capitol Pall. R0==8 Sacraom me .G 9561+ Sacrwmkoco,CS 958t4 915/=3-9484 91e/322-7791 DATE: December 28, 1483 CCLUIMM;°"�tmk. �at�pesP„rMT1M X e7i 9wus!3t: . 4th flaw O =am Itrwt T0: Revleveing Age//neies .. �GY Saoao .CL 9UL0 91e wMato. CL 9541i 1� FROM: Chris GogainC� G4 �✓�?!� � ' Cal�ticehts[seep omdaata Dept.X. Daim am 9easTfm SUBJECT: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's NOP for 0 s.�m d�"'9"116 uJ° P•.0. W ca 9sul. Master Plan for Dist. 5 A So. Half of Oist. 6 91e/=4-= 9u/s�-eau SCH 983122808 svrefdoe 37aesL a•a*s+Rseab, ZT►. Seatiaa CLLteame-olrtnias of JermaasUm 9ubuo otlllti"o�tadaa Attached for your comment is County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's Notice o socrmaam. cl 9=4 o w FrAW14100. cl of Preparation of a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for ►faster Plan for ftd/=*-OM 40AW 3=8 Dist. 45 and the Southern Half of District 96. ALMtgtlr 1b4Sneemea CjLL= es-P12aa104 Pabtia Soria 9oard Responsible agencies must transmit their concerns and comments an the scope o mm� 9M4 0 CL 0=5 and content of the EIR, focusing an specific information related to their own o.mia o•=.at M1920- a statutory responsibility, within 45 days of receipt of this notice. We oem"owe ( 2rr4at nao awetrman 9mm encourage commenting agencies to respond to this notice and express their o lau Lsata seat, son tZ4 o 14M Stain str"t concerns early in the environmental review process. slew ca seal* yes a 95414 /445-2438 Please direct your comments to: 0 Div.at Ittn"and 6eatoel *)bewt akesa S.Z.ag Cso.s.aelae i Dew't.C®. Hilary Baker o Di'.°t ou roe C" o 33 ram%. =lremae. 30=and 34a rraoalarn. Cd 941a1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County O Land a.ana.Mat= mall 413/537-Se84 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92703 OOw"* at rim and cave o saw hsm aeard 1416 ltam Scenes Lem Stsn St:— . sam� Iacm --.Cl 9=4 ti^--"m. Gi 95814 916/445-t= 9161=-'Awo with a copy to the Office of Planning and Research. Please refer to the SCi �at� ad,,W�z O T� �r.,.=..0 number noted above in all correspondence concerning this project. U =.11 sm�n 95414 11W-uta strwe a 3Sa14 If you nave any questians atout the review Process, tail me at 916/4A5-U613. new-im 91erm-r8u Osea L,ueYe Tin Mims a_tac7nent5 O � aT 31=m /G( 9kPt• of he ur r iasws 1ue.r1sm .e. �. uh6-tT (`/V� 1 tue xsam ae�.t / Hilary Baker sae�rm.ato, cl W414 3ae•amasm, n SM14 �!••; 9t6/=-399e 919/4i7-r4t8 v _y Jam•.urzm-. o Dept. it�rsr ser�.. o LI= it Street 3td/•wta.4-1=CI, 3681i O . nertsk-1xa9 ur"T cell :spt. of 3sai= 714 i at 3*LL A®+:O 0SaCr3==0. Q MI.4 31e/=-=CS TILE o1.UFFS I1011COUNERS ASSOC. BALBOA COVES COMMUNITY ASSOC. CORONA HIGHLANDS PROPERTY HARBOR RIDGE ESTATES HARBOR VIEW HILLS HOMEOWHERS LITTLE BALBOA ISLAND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION Robert Gresham, Manager Claudia Weyer, President OWNERS ASSOCIATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Campbell Property Serv.Inc. P. 0. Box 8167 48 Balboa Coves Jerry Esterbrook, President Gary Pomeroy, President Bing Girling, President Newport Beach, CA 92658-1167 Newport Beach, CA 92663 516 De Anza 2907 Ebbtido P. O. Box 74 1714 Clark Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Balboa Island, CA 92662 Long Beach, CA 90815 BROAD1400R HILLS SEA VIEW MAI KAI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION BALBOA IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION DOVER SHORES COMMUNITY ASSOC. HARBOR VIEW HILLS COMMUNITY HELIPORT UPPER BAY ESTATES Mel Fuchs, President HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Villageway Management, Inc. ASSOCIATION c/o Management Services Co. Joseph Moshi, President 700 E. Balboa Blvd. c/o Villageway Management,Inc. P. O. Box 4708 c/o Management Services Co. 1234 E. Normandy Place 2268 Golden Circle Balboa, CA 92661 P. 0. Box 4708 Irvine, CA. 92716 Irvine, CA 92716 1274 E. Normandy Place Santa Ana, CA 92705 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Santa Ana, CA 92705 BALBOA ISLAND BUSINESS ASSOC. BROADMOOR HILLS II COMMUNITY EASTBL.UFF APTS. OWNERS ASSOC. HARBOR VIEW KNOLLS COMMUNITY MARINERS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION NORTH BLUFF DAY VIEW COMMUNITY Howard R. Lowy, President ASSOC. c/o Villageway Management, Inc. ASSOCIATION Tom Edwards, President ASSOCIATION 133 Onyx Jim McClain, President P. 0. Box 4708 c/o Villageway Mgmt., Inc. 1533 Anita Lane c/o Mercury Property Mgmt. Balboa Island, CA 92662 2606 Lighthouse Irvine, CA 92716 P. 0. Box 4708 Newport Beach, CA 92660 4670 Barranca Parkway Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Irvine, CA 92716 Irvine, CA 92714 BALBOA ISLAND IMPROVEMENT ASSOC. BREAKERS DRIVE ASSOCIATION,INC. EASTBLUFF HOMEOWNERS COMMUNITY IRVINE COVE COMMUNITY ASSOC. NEWPORT CENTER ASSOCIATION NORTH BLUFF PARK. C01tHUNITY ASSOC. A. L. Taft, President Dr, W.F. Robinson, President ASSOCIATION Dr. Bob Montgomery, President Karen Kennedy, Managing Dir. c/o Mercury property Management / 2695 Riviera Drive 180 Newport Center Dr. 1180 y 1235 Coral 3002 breakers Dive e o David Radford b Associates P 4670 Barranca Parkway Balboa Island, CA 92662 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 3822 Campus Drive Suite 204 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Irvine, CA 92714 Newport Beach, CA 92660 BALBOA PENINSULA POINT ASSOC. CAMEO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONt FASHION ISLAND MANAGEMENT ASSOC. IRVINE TERRACE COMMUNITY ASSOC. NEWPORT CONDO ASSOCIATION NORTH BLUFF VILLA COMMUNITY Nancy Larner, President Martin B. Greenbaum Barbara Roppolo, General Mgr. John Konwiser, President c/o Management Services Co. ASSOCIATIONI 1412 E. Ocean Front 325 Cameo Shores Road Tom Allen, Assist. Center 11gr. 1907 Bayadere Drive 1234 E. Normandy Place c/o Villageway Management, Inc. Balboa, CA 92661 Corona del. Mar, CA 92625 162 Fashion island Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Santa Ana, CA 92705 P. O. Box 4708 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Irvine, CA 92716 BAY ISLAND CVJB, INC. CANYON VIEW COMMUNITY ASSOC. FOUR FOURS ASSOCIATION LSLAND LAGOON ASSOCIATION NEWPORT HTS. COMMUNITY ASSOC. PARK LIDO ASSOCIATION Coughs Fletcher Jack L. Manson, President Margo Butler, President c/o Merit Property Management Steve Debbie, President Alice Rail, President 3,116 Via Oporto Suite 300 114 Rue Cannes 2508 University Drive 27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 180 330 Santa Ana Avenue 434 Orion Way Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 BAYSIDE COVE COMM. ASSOC. CENTRAL NEWPORT BEACH COMMUNITY HARBOR ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOC. JASMINE CREEK COMMUNITY ASSOC. NEWPORT CREST HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. PLAZA HOMEOWNERS COMMUNITY ASSOC. c/o Mercury Prop. Mgmt., Inc. ASSOC. Mrs. Pettetier William Abbott, President c/o Mercury property Mgmt. Earle William Burke, President 4670 Barranca Parkway Henry R. Swenerton, President 833 Dover Drive Suite 421 110 Jasmine Creek Drive 4670 Barranca Parkway c/o Robert MacNeil Corp. Irvine, CA 92714 1106 W. Ocean Front Newport Beach, CA 92663 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Irvine, CA 92714 One City Blvd. west 1407 Balboa, CA 92661 Orange, CA 92668 BAYSIDE VILLAGT HOMEOWNERS CLIFF HAVEN COMMUNITY ASSOC. HARBOR ISLAtiD COMMUNITY ASSOC. LIDO ISLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION NEWPORT HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOC. PROMONTORY BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. ASSOCIATION, Inc. Pete Gendron, President James Rogers, President Dave Mender, President c/o Villageway Management, Inc, c/o Villageway management, Inc. Arthur J. Sullivan, President 519 Signal Road 110 Harbor Island 701 Via Lido Seed P. 0. Box 4708 P. 0. Box 4708 300 E. Coast Highway Sp. 112 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Irvine, CA 92716 Irvine, CA 92716 Newport Beach, CA 92660 BAYSHORES COMMUNITY ASSOC. COROLIDO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION HARBOR RIDGE MASTERS ASSOCIATION LIDO PARK C(XiMUNITY ASSOCIATIONI NEWPORT ISLAND INCORPORATED RENDEZVOUS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC. c/o 'Jillageway Management, Inc. John Sipple, President James J. Butler, Jr., President c/o C.A.H.S. Jo Ann Schni c/o Management Services Co. 490 Morning Canyon Road pp/Gayle Greeaon 9 P. O. Box 4700 9 Y 1670 Santa Ana Avenue Suite P 14600 Coldenweat Suite 102-A Co-Presidents 1234 E. Normandy place Irvine, CA 92716 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Westminster, CA 92603 P. O. Box 1162 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Newport Beach, CA 92663 BEACON BAY COMMUNITY ASSOC. CORONA DEL MAR COMMUN. ASSOC. HARBOR HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. LIDO SANDS COMMUNITY ASSOC. NEWPORT SHORES COMMUNITY ASSOC. SANDCASTLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION/ Dan Guggenheim, President Richard Nichols, President c/o Merit Property Mgmt., Inc. Jack Milligan, President Ray Quinn, President CORONA DEL MAR 14 Beach Bay - P. O. Box 516 27285 Las Rambles, Suite 180 5209 Bruce Cres Court 477 Prospect c/o Villageway management, Inc. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Corona del Mar, CA 32625 Aission Viejo, CA 92691 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 P. 0. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 BIG CANYON COMMUIITY ASSOC. HARBOR VIEW COMMUNITY ASSOC. HARBOR VIEW BROADMOOR COMM. LINDA ISLE COMMUNITY ASSOC. NEWPORT TERRACE HOMEOWNERS SEA ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Bernard Sampson, President c/o Villageway Management, Inc. ASSOCIATION C/o Management Services Co. ASSOCIATION Phil Wiltse 3 Inverness Lane P. 0. Box 4700 Ted Rokos, President Irvine, CA 92716 1234 E. Normandy place c/o Management Services Co. 19 Sea Island Newport Beach, CA 92660 2727 Windover Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 1234 E. Normandy Place Newport Beach, CA 92660 --Corona r1-NAr, CA`92625 LF -`. U-- t Santt1 Ana, CA 92705 t_ SEA PINE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VILLA GRANADA COMMUNITY ASSOC. c/o Villageway Management, Inc. Lorraine Helverson P. O. Box 4700 835 Amigos Way 913 , Irvine, CA 92716 Newport Beach, CA 92660 SEA WIND NEWPORT COMMUNITY CANYON CREST COMMUNITY ASSOC. ASSOCIATION c/o Villageway Management Inc. c/o C.A.M.S. P. o. Box 4708 14600 Goldenwost M102-A Irvine, CA 92716 Westminster, CA 92683 SEAVIEW COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION CANYON CREST ESTATES HOMEOWIIERS c/o Villageway Management, Inc. ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 4708 c/o Villageway Management Inc. Irvine, CA 92716 P. O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 SUORECLIFFS COIU4H1ITY ASSOC. CANYON HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOC. John Killefer, President c/o Villageway Management, Inc. 161 Shorecliff Road P. O. Box 4708 Corona del Har. CA 92625 Irvine, CA 92716 SPYGLASS HILL COMMUNITY ASSOC. CANYON ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOC. c/o Village-day Management, Inc, c/o Villageway Management Inc. P. O. Bcx 470E P. O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Irvine, CA 92716 SPYGLASS RIDGE C014MUNITY ASSOC. CANYON LAKES COMMUNITY ASSOC. Everett Stahl, President c/o Villageway Management Inc. 1618 Reef View Circle P. 0. Box 4708 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Irvine, CA 92716 WEST NEWPORT BEACH ASSOCIATION CANYON MESA COMMUNITY ASSOC. Jan DeBay, President c/o villageway management Inc. 5107 Seashore Drive P. 0. Box 4708 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Irvine, CA 92716 VILLA BALBOA COMMUNITY ASSOC. CANYON POINT COMMUNITY ASSOC. c/o Mercury Property Mqmt Co. c/o Villageway Management Inc. 4670 Barranca Parkway P. O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92714 Irvine, CA 92716 VERSAILLES ASSOCIATION HARBOR RIDGE CREST COMMUNITY c/o Mercury Property Hgmt, Co. ASSOCIATION •1670 Barranca Parkway c/o Campbell Property Serv.,Inc. Irvine, CA 92714 1714 Clark Avenue Long Beach, CA 90RIS o.arv.rt of t saeonr asset 'its._ list and Gems- enal or-e" DW Caaraoa, A• IEgtar, a.poaal fixer 0 oepareztn at mat Km a04 G+a» ar°sp tac 1 Tdw Ua1O0 sm"t 0 a atlas. CA 9eoos JOUTHERA CALIFOR111A 7/442-auiec 91e/146"s74 RllOCIAT10n OF GOVERnmEn 600 touch Comatonweofth Rwaue-kite t000•tar Regale/.Catiforrtla•90005.213/385-1000 ktdwlla Ga1la�aat P."Mom. 8.10Mal flaaai*r O 0 11 at � O �� ry t at flxh aw Ga Fe]37'A1.11 oan t701 Stono aerd.Sala A 910/740. cl gowl 91e/3M-0= Gl 9Gb10 DATE: January 25, 1984 Sri"S.SaitII a. mmtar, aepocal:anger i L.J 0 ot� 1 at ZIM O °•pr=aos at Kos ad Game raaesruld rt�luer,aldt. e "=-arts tg laaaratlle. CA 4tSgP rarr..tlte, a ce9ot sie/a14-+tat � `�� TO: County Sanitation Districts %amya>ltrf of Orange County, California O District 1t Praet ar rrst.mro.esoe n o'�0"• P.O. Box 8127 �../ ���Gam' 10844 Ellis Avenue • atr�ma saaex r✓ "vm, ea spate Fountain Valley. CA 92708 Sea rrabassss, CA "W 415/W LBR7 ��' �. Attn: Ms. Hilary Baker Jam tsar /rod A. 10 Jr., SM. i�r Oepartlaaa at Ttaaspoastlm °eprows at r1W ad aa= O otxuut s 20 Toes araar<r FROM: Metropolitan Clearinghouse SO-3¢twi'�ra Ser�as O rtrrt•1 cast aaaca. CA 9CI OR-31657-HP Sao tote Obem. Ca M401 1 420-91.13 xoa/�m14 SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN REPORT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SOUTH sass Peru" foil a, tail HRO OF DISTRICT NO. 6 O °ep ptur_c at Transpamtsco yarim ga�.m °fie O ta 'te r Thank you for submitting the Notice to Prepare the environmental document rraroo. a 9Jrta //890tan�-31.Y1� !laaa7 for the referenced project for SCAG review. SCAG staff does not have �/4ae-4aas comments at this time but looks forward to reviewing the environmental Vero 3a11ettw document when available. OOaprtZkon at Teaaepartatlaa Jtsta later S Cbartot aartt otstrcc t ,road JW%na z Sincerely, Lt a re t9°o1� su Tatar aeQ ats aoei Q==Q4 he O Ol.ttfaa at rater a,d„t7 P.O. aax too. aobrre Para tea• CA sacral OOava+t+roc et Yrsorpartrsaa ate/3?3-3413 Otxertr_a Serr7 tub W._QW-4141d a .QiY sate rarer eeenrar Caat:a! 3aad W NOY A. RPHY U9k •a 92+0 O oath ems Clearinghouse Official 1W Wta St., Ucr=eato.CA MIS Zu oleo P.Q. sox tea. U=%tq=, a aaeol WM:wp8 O Oaparoem of Tiaatiparassm Al Taq Otscsee r State Tatar ssaamta CM 1 3== tG Tale]r.7et QSKsim of later aLota 3txaop, a s4314 0 sat P 3tre e twerp-uu sacr:RELso. CA 9aet4 S.wallaae: 9L0/724-372 Oetaact=reae et tzapporat:aa © aetiaaasr1.ttr teal Sur• 31m-.ec .O �/�.JL. T.d T��'.� 1K.ao s CSt7 L.. Stoerm, CA ?sml i Jfa ate-. :apr-eat u .:+apPor'Zt:aa Otxr-tat 11 *!=..'ua ac.-On 334 7t4to. C1 92= 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE 06KMEIIAN,Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD South COdSt SANTA ANA REGION 9e09 INDIANA AVENUE.SUITE 200 - AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RIVERSIDE. 1 484-0330 92Soe i 9150 FLAIR DRIVE,EL MONTE.CA 91731 (213)972-A200 aNONe: tTl sl 9e�_9a�o January S, 1984 January 25, 1984 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Ms. Hilary Baker P.O. Box 8127 i County Sanitation Districts of Fountain Valley, California 92708 !. Orange County 8127 Gentlemen: FountaiinxValley. CA 92708 Notice of Preparation of EIR on the Master Plan NOP: Master Plan Report for County Sanitation District No. 5 and for Districts No. S 8 6 South Half of District No. 6, SCH #83122808 AOMD r1131228S Dear Ms. Baker: Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. While the South Coast Air Quality Management District does not seem We have reviewed the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this project. to have permit authority over the proposed construction, we In response to the statutory concerns of this office, the Draft have several basic air quality concerns. EIR should address the following: First, construction emissions, especially dust, must be mitigated I. Water Quality in accordance with District rules. A. Potential impacts of the proposed project on ocean, surface Second, while the potential for nuisance odor imppacts appears low, and ground water quality: equipment must be maintained so that there will be no impacts in future years. - Construction activities (including dewatering) that could I result in water quality impacts. Finally, the Notice of Preparation mentions that this projject will serve future planned growth. We arge that the growth•-forecast - Soil characteristics related to water quality (potential used be consistent with "SCAG-821, prepared and adopted by the for erosion and subsequent siltation, increase or decrease Southern California Association of Governments. SCAG-82 was in percolation). used as the basis for the regional Air Qualityy Management Plan (AQMP). Growth consistent with the IMP can be accommodated. - Impacts of generation, treatment and disposal of ultimate Growth in excess of the AQMP, if not ully mitigated, will flows projected to be served by the proposed collection interfere with the attainment of air quality standards. Such system. inconsistency would be considered a significant adverse impact. - Impacts of handling/disposal of industrial waste discharge If you have any questions, please contact me at (818) S72-6418. and/or toxic substances to be served by the proposed col- lection system. Very truly yours, B. Mitigation of Adverse Impacts �FarriVs, Collection system failures which have resulted in the flaw r Head of raw sewage into Newport Bay have occurred in the project Environmental/Energy/ area. The DEIR should address the potential water quality Economics Section impacts of failures in the expanded and renovated system; suitable mitigation measures (e.g. contingency plans) should BF:cas be identified. SIAII Of CA1000NIA-1NI[ISOUMCIS AOINCV _GIc.GI PI U,MIIUN,Gew Ms. Hilary Baker -2- January 25. 1984 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 245 W. Broadway, suite 350 Irene Beach, CA 90802 a-;_ (213) 590-5113 11. Waste Disposal/Treatment February 2, 1984 - Types and amounts of waste materials generated by project emplacement and served by project at ultimate flow levels. - Proposed waste treatment and disposal methods. 7homas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer - Applications or permits required to implement waste disposal. County sanitation Districts It should; a noted that if depatering is necessary, any of orange County discharge of this wastewater ;to receiving waters must conform P.O. Box 8127 to the requirements of CSDOC's NPDES dewatering permit. fbuntain Valley, California 92708 - Impact of projected ultimate flow volume on capacity of existing Dear Mr. Dawes: and proposed treatment and disposal facilities. We have reviewed the Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR for the Master We have received environmental documentation for several other projects Plan Report for County Sanitation District No. 5 and South Half of District under your jurisdiction (DEIR: Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of No. 6. In order for our staff to adequately comment on the document, we Trunk Sewers for District No. 1. the Northern Half of District No. 6, recommend that the following information be included: and District No. 7; DEIR: Districts 2.3 and 11 Sewage Collection System Master Plan; NON County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation). As '1. A complete assessment of the flora and fauna found within the project In the present proposal, each of these projects would accommodate future area. Particular emphasis should be placed upon identifying rare, development in its respective area. The DEIR should assess the potential endangered, and locally unique species. impacts on water quality and on sewage treatment facilities of the cumulative ultimate flows projected by these combined proposals. 2. Documentation of the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts which would adversely affect biotic resources within and adjacent to the We look forward to review of the DEIR when it becomes available. project site. Measures to compensate for the loss of wildlife habitat If you have any questions, please contact this office. should be provided. Sincerely, 3. An assessment of potential urban growth-inducement factors attributable to the project. �7fiNiil(, E_ Any diversion of the natural flow or changes in the channel, bed, or banks Joanne E. Schneider of any river, stream, or lake will require notification to the Department of Environmental Specialist III Fish and Came as called for in Section 1601 of the Fish and Game Code. This i notification (with fee) and the subsequent agreement must be completed prior to initiating any such changes. We urge compliance with this code section cc: Chris Goggin - Office of Planning and Research I prior to completion of the specific design since project features associated JES:kyb with streams or streambeds may require modifications. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Jack L. Spruill of our Fh vironmental Services staff at (213) 590-5137. Sincerely, ` Fled A. {brthley Jr. t��0a Regional Manager Region 5 cc: D. Racine i i LTAnt of ZiWrotNU_TR6 111e3OURC1S AGENCY GBORGE DIUKMILIAN.Govmror (2) OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT Of PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: 29 December 1983 POET OMCJd1Xr 60x Nato 0 4 Consult with particular cultural or ethnic Y 6ACLWOrrO,CAt1PORN4A f3e1t REPLY TO: ( ) groups it there is an reasonable possibility that a resource of (916)445.8006 Interest to them might be affected by the project, Please note that if any federal agency,board or commission Is Involved in this Project complianca with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended,is required.The DEIR should be drafted to reflect compliance with the requirements of this Act r Thomas Dawes If you har4at16r"24e a czii Nicholls Del Cioono of this Orange County Sanitation District office at ���ll P.O. Bdx 8127 Sincerely, 1 Fountain Valleys CA 92708 L i attentions Hilary Baker RE. EIR for CDunty Sanitation Districts No. 5 and 6 Thank you for requesting our comments un the MOP cited above. Dr.Knox Mellon State Historic Preservation Officer The DEIR should: «: State Clearinghouse (1) Describe actions taken to Identify histeric,archeological,architectural!or other cultural resources located in the project area,and should present results obtained.Only those resources likely to be affected by the project tNFORMATION CENTERS COUNTIES INFORMATION CENTERS COUNTIES need be ldentifled. Dr.Oavld A.Fredrlsksor,Coordin4tor Alameda,Coluot,Contra Cosa. Or.Michael A.Glaraw,Coordinator San Luis Obltpo,Santa Barbara (2) Include a physical description of Identified cultural resources and their setting supplemented by clear Nanh.est I.forrnarlan Center Del Norco,Humboldt.Lake, Central Costal tnfort anon Center Photographs. Detriment of A-ihrocolory Marl-,Mendocino,Monterey, 0.94rdne-t of Anrhroeotaev Sonoma Stan 1lnt.erslty Napa,San B.nito,San Francisco, Uni.enity of Callfomla,Santa Strata Rohnan Park,CA 94976 San Mateo,Santa Clan,Santa Santa Buren,CA 91106 (3) Contain 4 documented evaluation of the Importance of any cultural resources Identified,indicating what Attn: Allen Bramlette Cr it,Salado,Sonoma,Yolo Attn: Lam wllcoxon standards or criteria were used,how they were applied and by whom,and what conclusions were reached and (707)664.2494;ATSS$66.2494 46011 961.2474;AT55 649.1474 why. Or.Mark Korta,Coordinator Butn,Glenn,Casten,Mpdae, Or.Larry L.la+U+,Coordinator San Otega (4 DrrvAba and analyze as precisely as possible any adverse impacts to important cultural resources using she Northeast Information not ro Center Pl h—A Shatu,Siena,5lsklyou, Scum Ceuul mforrnaool gy ) g Oepartrnen[of Anthropology ienama,Trinity Da9artm.nt of Anmro9dory definition of effect contained In Sections 15382 and 15126(a)of the EIR Guidelines.The focus should be on California Stitt Uninrstry.Chico San Olato Sur Unlv.rtay how and to what extent those qualities that make than resources Important may be adversely affected by the Clow.CA 93926 San Olsen,CA 92162 proles Attn: wltliam Dreyer Attn: Fred Kidder (9161 495-6256,ATSS 459.6256 (e191 265-63001ATSS 6364300 (5) Discuss reasonable alternatives that would avoid any adverse affects to the qualities that make these resources Mr.Jerald I.Johnson,Coordlft&W Aril El Oneida,Nevada, Or.Gerard A.Smlm.Coordinuor San Bernardino Important.Familiarity with current presamdon techniques in architecture,land use planning,public polity mom Central Information Center Plater,Sauam.nto,Suter, Sen Bernardino Informadon Center development,preservation law and cultural resource management should be clearly evident in the choir and Dmartmans of Mmropotory Yuba $a,Sernudlno County Museum Gtlfortp State University,Sacramento 2024 Orange Trot Lane discussion of altematives. 60001 Street Redlands,CA 92373 Sacramento,CA 95919 Attn: Michael Lerch 16) Propose reasonable mitigation measures to minimize adverse effects to the important qualities of these re- Attn: Madamco Russo 47141 7916045 sources In accordance with Section 15116(c)of the EIR Guidelines.Familiarity with current preservation 19161454.6117:ATSS 432.6217 techniques in architecaue, land use planning, public policy development, preservation law and cultural Or.L Kyle Heaton,Coordinator Alpine.Calt.erta.Marlboro, or.Phltu9 1•Wilk..Coordinator Invo,Mona,Rlven[do resource management should be clearly evident In the choice and discussion of mitigation measures. Central California Information Canter Marc.d,Sen loaa.tn,Stanislaw. Eirtern lnfo-narlon Geier i Clllfemta SUM College,Stul Tuot.mn. Archeological Rinearm Unit (7) Conform to the requirements of Sections 15126(b),(a),(f)and(III of the EIR Guidelines If applicable. I Turlock,CA 95390 Uninnity of Gllfomia,Riverside Arun: Mt E.Greathouot 0.lvenid.,CA 92521 As part Of the data gathering effors,it is generally advisable to: (2091 667.1307;ATSS 427.1307 Attn: Daniel McCuttly (7141 737.36e5;ATSS 6S T•3663 �Or.lam.Grtrtskog,Coordinator Fresno,Ktnga,Madan (1) Consult one of the Regional Archeolagial Information Centers listed on the back of this letter for current C10011 San Iwauin Valley 7 o-r afc5sy von w..x.nr,Coordinator Imoenai archeological resource data. Information Center S3u*;Information Center i Detainment of SoeloleryfAnmr000lory hnperlal Valley Cutlets Muw.m (2) Refrain from dealingwith sl Cailfomta State College,Bakersfield _ 4t4tt2 Main Shoat tee buildings,structures or objects less than fifty yarn of age unless they appear 9001 Stockdale Highway �� Z1d 9—I,WP,..�A 92243 to be of exceptional importance. Makantleld.CA 93309 Arm. Edward Collins Arm: Gmetina Le-i (619) 152.1667 (3) Consult with historical societies,archeological societies,preservation organizations,landmark commissions or (60S)e33-2299 1,1! 4't o. uaue Arch.aogtw Dark 0.eaevtay: boards,county or city Planning departments and redevelopment agencies,all of wham may have information Or.Rohm el n.Co nte Korn,Tutsn about CUIUtraI resources in a particular project area. South Central Infarmaton center Mt.Sn Coev Loa Angtfet,Oeinp,Ventura Bakersfield College Archeatotical Surrev 1601 psnofrrna Oran Imtime of Archeology Bakersfield,CA 93305 Unw.nity of Gllfernta.Lot Angles ItOSI 195�)91 or 3954011 Los Antrim CA 90024 12131 025-1720:ATSS 725.1720 STATE Of CAU/ORNIA-RUSINFSS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY _ 09_OF4_9OG_��__�µ�W STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN G".F DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY DISTRICT 7.F.O.BOX 7704.LOS ANGELES POOH PAUL R.BONDERSON BUILDING . 1 901 P STREET P.O.BOX 100 9. (213) 620-5335 SACRAMENTO.CALIFORNIA 95801 (916) 322-3413 January 9, 1984 HOP Response Master Plan for Sanitation MUD 5884 Districts Mr. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box B127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Ms. Hilary Baker Dear Mr. Dawes: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Caltrane has reviewed the NOP for the EIR on the Master Plan Re- P. 0. Box 8127 port for County Sanitation District No. 5 and south half of Dis- Fountain Valley, CA 92708 trict No. 6. Dear Ms. Baker: The project proposes the repair and rehabilitation of various sewage facilities in central coastal Orange County. The E3R on NOTICE OF PREPARATION FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE MASTER the Master Plan Report will need to address the short-term in- PLAN REPORT FOR CSD 95 AND SOUTH HALF OF 06 crease in traffic hazards due to construction. Also, the short- term and long-term impacts on patterns of traffic circulation. The Division received the subject notice dated December 22, 1983, on January 3, 1984. Since the proposed activities are not funded by the The improved capacity of the sewage facilities are growth induc- Clean Water Grant Program, no further correspondence with this Division ing and will create increased demand on Pacific Coast Highway and is needed. Please remove this agency from the distribution list. Routes 55 and 73. Sincerely, Therefore, a discussion of the project's impact on traffic conges- tion should be included. Quantify the existing traffic character- Q--� isties in the area and the estimated impact of the proposed project. Our staff can provide you with traffic data for the above referenced Yoan M. Jurancich state facilities if needed. Environmental Specialist The cumulative impacts from this project and others planned in the Enclosure area should be examined. I i The contact person in our agency for this project is Connie Collins. She can be contacted at (213) 620-4913• Very truly yours, N.. Bb. Ec NiINE, Chief i Environmental Planning Branch STATE of CAUFOENIA—ENE RESOURCES AOENCE GEORGEDEUKMEt1AN.00r STATE OF CAUFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY George Deukmejian, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OF BOATING AND WATERWAYS ( /) Eel►S.STREET I.O.EOr nvo SACRAMENTO.CAUFORNIA 93914 SACRAMENTO 9SE1) (916)A4S4281 OW 445-7067 January 5, 1984 January 17, 1984 Mr. ?homes M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Hs. Hilary Baker County Sanitation Districts County Sanitation Districts of orange County of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Boat Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 10844 Ellie Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Dawes: Dear He. Baker: Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for County Sanitation District No. 5 and South Half of District No. 6 SUBJECT: Notice of Pro ation ![eater Plan Re rt for Count Sanitation he Department of Boating end Waterways is not a regulatory agency District No. 5 and nth Half o istrict o. 'y 22 P 8 Y g rY g Y and therefore does not issue permits of any kind. However, we do The Department of Parke and Recreation has reviewed the subject materials and review and may comment upon U.S. Corps of Engineer public notices has the following comments. for proposed projects which are subject to that federal agency's jurisdiction. We review and may comment on environmental documents The Department is concerned about potential impacts to State Park System (SPS) which are submitted to us by the State Clearinghouse. For review lands from the proposed project. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) purposes on both environmental documents and Corps public notices, the should identify all aspects of the proposed project which may impact BPS ra- Department's interests lie in the following areas: sources. Of particular concern is the pplacement, operation and maintenance of the Crystal Cove pump station (item 4--e). The document should specify whether 1. Potential for navigation hazards - to what extent might the the pump station will be within CA1122061 right-of-way or be placed on BPS proposed project affect safe navigation in California's waterways? land. If the pump station is proposed for BPS land, the County Sanitation District will have to apply to this Department for an easement. Also, if the 2. Beach erosion - to what extent might the proposed project affect pump station is proposed for 08 land then the DEIR must identify the impacts the stability of coastal as well as inland beaches? of the project and mitigation measures that would reduce those impacts to a level of nonsignificance. Alternative sites other than BPS land for the place- 3. Boating and boating facilities - to what extent might the proposed meat of the pump station should also be explored. project affect existing or planned small craft harbors, launching facilities. and other boating facilities? To what extent might This Department is in the process of developing Crystal Cove State Park. In recreational boating activities be affected? the future we may want to take advantage of the Orange County Sanitation Dia- trilt facilities. Will there be adequate capacity to accommodate the 25,000 I£ you have further questions concerning our role in project review OPD- expected to be generated by Crystal Cove State Park? processes, please contact Barbara Kierbow of our Environmental Unit Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Prepare- at (916) 323-9488. Lion. We are looking forward to receiving a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Please send a copy of the Draft EIR to this Department's con- Sincerely, tact person, James H. Doyle, Supervisor, Environmental Review Section, at the ��f � // / above address. w Sincerely, WILLIAM 11. IVERS Director A,-G. H. Getty. cos State Clearinghouse Qa'/Resource Protection Division FOR 50 YEARS ' 08P11E COt�_D a�M PNA1P L ANTNOMY p, Ft EIVED NOME J.W111T8 KATHRYN L 9ARR '933 'O1% !SB7 jAN 10 1983 ROBER7 L CLARK ®� .J JOHN OARTNE JOHN V.FONLEY [ �] (�1 V[� F.W Nte plow" JOHN OARTHe ..�• 10SEPH F. SIL•L JOHN V.roWL'Y LAWRENCE P.KRMMER,JR. S�d 17co Prevd n LAUGUST OO R. 1NNOVA N IANOOON W.OWEN AMAOMO OF r/ January 10. 1984 — NAV N BLED. EOERSTRON ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Kea".CLINE 012714587KLI/84 NOBLE J.wATTg s""N`Y PL 26.6 Mr. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer January 5, 1984 County Sanitation District of Orange County Mr. Thomas M. Dawes P.O. Box 8127 Deputy Chief Engineer Fountain Valley, CA 92708 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County SUBJECT: 1RVINE COAST DEVELOPMENT; RESPONSE TO NOTICE P.O. Box 8127 OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Tom: Dear Mr. Dawes: We have reviewed your letter dated December 22, 1983, notifying the Irvine Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan for County Ranch Hater District (IRWD) of the preparation of an EIR for the Master Plan Sanitation District No. 5 and South Half of District No. 6 Report for CSD No. 5 and the South Half of CSD No. 6. This is in response to your letter dated December 22, 1983, In March 1983. IRWO completed its Sub-Area Master Plan (SAMP) for future requesting any comments we might have on various projects in Water and Sanitary Sewerage Facilities for the Irvine Coast Development. We Sanitation Districts No. 5 and No. 6. are enclosing a copy for your review in conjunction with the preparation of your EIR. The information provided is not detailed enough to determine what project may occur at the crossing of the Santa Ana River; however, Because your project includes rehabilitation or construction of facilities if the district is considering construction of a pipeline under within the Irvine Coast area for which IRWD prepared its SAMP and has the Santa Ana River, the contract should be formulated in a manner jurisdiction, we want to ensure that the EIR, and overall project scope such that the contractor is aware that flows may occur in the accurately reflect that work, or those facilities, that IRWD will be river at any time, including the summer. constructing. In addition, because IRWD is planning to use the Pacific Coast Highway Sewer as our main collection sewer, we want to ensure that sufficient Very truly yours, capacity will exist after your proposed work to allow us to provide the collection system outlined in our SAMP. In addition, since your EIR will address many of the environmental impacts Nerbds�LRichardson which we will be addressing In future EIR's for our facilities, we would District Engineer appreciate being retained on your distribution list for the Draft EIR. NR/mm togeo EMS AVENUE•PO.86X Moo FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUr-0RNU 92728.M TELEPHONE(7 4)9"56611668-8M if -_ [ - tr- V_ [— U - f- [- I—_- C I I - C E - t- --- OF It? u � 2 R. ,z. • m Mr. Thomas M. Dawes 012714587XL1/84 January 10, 1984 Pl. 26.6 Page 2 January 19, 1984 If you have any Questions, please feel free to contact me at (714)833-1223. Sincerely, Mr. Thomas M. Dawes IRVINE RAMCH4ATER DISTRICT I County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Keith Lewinger Principal Engineer Dear Mr. Dawes: KL/TRH:pjk NOTICE OF PREPARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE MASTER cc: Tom Holliman, IRWD PLAN REPORT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SOUTH HAI.F OF Ergun Bakall, IRWD DISTRICT NO. 6 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Preparation for the above mentioned EIR. The City of Irvine has no comments to make at this time. Please continue to keep us in- formed of projects which could potentially impact the City. Sincerely, DAVE SEWELL Planner II DS:bb cc: File 61A CITY OF IRvINE,172CO JAMBOREE ROAD,P 0 BOX 19575.IFMNE,CAUIFORNIA 92713 7141754-3600 NOTICE OF PR PAPATION RESPONSE FORM , - ::. .. THE IRVINE CC PANY 550 Newport Center Drive.P.O.Box 1 r•' Newport Beach.Catilornia 92660.0015 This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice 17141720.2000 of Preparation. If more space is required or if you prefer a different format, please feel free to deviate from this form as necessary. if you have input, please complete the form and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft January 23, 1984 EIR. L — ibLn.yls� 37� County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Agency i1, ,� Ill ' t + P. 0. Box 8127 t Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Mailing address �jQ�� TI�tLI �• 1��7 ��'l Attention: Mr. Tom Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer C i ty—Im.-tw'. State (:lt. Zip Subject: Environmental Impact Report Telephone ( 114 ) C wy OCSD No. S and No. 6 Master Plan ��n Dear Mr. Dawes: Contact Person VAI 1j �rX We have received your Notice of Preparation for the EIR for the District S and 6 sewer master plan. As requested, LEVEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. enclosed is the completed form identifying our specific areas of concern and interest in this project. No interest (delete from distribution list) Several of the facilities identified in the proposed sewer master plan will provide service to our property in the Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) Coastal area. Therefore, we are vitally interested in your master plan process and EIR. Please forward a copy Q Major interest (state key areas of your concern) : of the draft EIR to my attention when it becomes available. If we can assist by providing any support information, please call. Sincerely, � PERMIT/PWVIEW REQUIREMENTS D Stiles irector of Development Engineering Do .you or your agency have statutory permit authority or Community Development Division advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT DWS/ss AREA. If so, please list. Applicability Within Area of Concern Authority Project Area EXHIBIT II. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE CATEGORIES NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM Please indicate your interests and items that should be addressed in the proposed EIR. This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice Category Comments of Preparation. If more space is required or if you prefer GEOLOGY/SOILS a different format, please feel free to deviate from this form as necessary. If you have input, please complete the form and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft EIR. HYDROLOGYtWATER QUALITY Agency The Irvine Company Mailing Address 550 Newport Center Urive City Newport Beach State CA Zip 92660-0015 VEGETATION/WILDLIFE Telephone ( 714 ) 720-2359 Contact Person Dayne Stiles, Director, Development Engineering ARCHAEOLOGY/HISTORY LEVEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. [� No interest (delete from distribution list) Q Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) ® Major interest (state key areas of your concern) : EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES Existing and proposed land use in the "coastal area" between Newpport Beach and Laguna Beach including Crystal Cove State Park should be Proposed facilities will serve lands vaned by the Irvine discussed in the EIR. Company. ' RELEVANT LAND USE PLANNING PERlfIT/REVIEW REQUIREMENTS Coastal Area local Coastal Plan approved by County of Orange Do you or your agency have statutory permit authority or advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT DEMOGRAPHY AND GROWTH DYNAMICS AREA. If so, please list. Applicability Within Area of Concern Authority Project Area TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION r N l CENTRAL NEWPORT BEACH Community Association P.O.Box 884 Balboa.Ca.92661 o 0-a—M County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 0 c b m a c P. 0. Box 8127. Fountain Valley, California, 92708 = E c EEs m c cc 0 CLZ;cc Attentions No. Hilary Baker W 'S ao'E m M y�m m H m Rer Preparation of an EIR on the Master Plan for County Sanitation cm .: District No. 9 and South Half of District No. 6 tom/) c 2 19 W m .Z" 0...�b C r- Dear Na. Baker, CUR W Q E m . You will recall that Mr. Henry K. Swenerton, immediate Past ®o © m M m G ti E . President of the CNBCA talked with you by telephone on January �� E a oil 2^a 10, 1984 regarding the content of your communication on the above y o u m CD referenced matter dated January 9, 1984. E E n We have been advised numerous times in the last year by the City W �'$m $ 5 Manager of Newport Beach, Mr. Robert Wynn and members of his staff, ® e. � $$S n m m that the sewer lines serving the Balboa peninsula have reached the La:l m m m— c-- point of "zero life" status and are being infiltrated by sea water .a m n c a m� which presents serious problems for the sewage treatment plant. ® a d W c m n o 0 Mr. Swenerton Swenerton was formerly Vice President and General Manager of na' Gladding, McKean & Company. for over seventy five years the largest oo Q �` '.E e$7 m`. producer of vitrified clay pipe in the State of California. He p r recommends strongly that any rehabilitation of the sewer line on the peninsula be accomplished using vitrified clay sewer pipe A . . e m o n r-m ai e c a. m,2 c ai rather than cement pipe. Mr. Swenerton is not now in the pipe b.c'a n a, y` =-E " m a= business but his experience and expertise in this matter has ; ��� vCD omi m m'a�a,ea proven helpful to us. m= $ as m n g = --S o` ^i E3bCac. -WQj maim m We would like to make a second request for your consideration. H e �. _ o Last summer the City of Newport Beach scheduled the relining of $cc 0­aj min m r-d E E water lines by Ameron Corporation (using mortar) at the height _ oo—y o m� •n m C'nac m a A o c..__. b o— m— of the tourist season. Our alleys on the peninsula and some of T:-' a a.5 m m, c o n cm u m�,•=a)13 the street ends resembled a battlefield. We went through the ® — o o m v. n� m m >,r c Fourth of July weekend with many of our fire hydrants nonoperational. �1 ri a �m m`r$c: . E o r c y�E n��3 E We therefore most respectfully request that the replacement of ..� o 5� =Em o m crn 2 c n y�o F sewer lines be scheduled with due consideration for the volume of jL,' ts 0-0— o e m_ m m m u a, tourist traffic on the peninsula. Any contractor will advise you J C E e r mo E=a,m m o a c v e that construction on the peninsula should be scheduled during c n o ao m F-- -U CLb= n'_'b'� c the months following Labor Day and prior to June 15. As you know, a a' H yb n m m m o—m m mr h o c the population of Newport Beach which is approximately 66,000 r aEi y cY a O so IOU,$ m.Su a 3 nL often can'swell to 200.000 with the infusion of summer residents $$ .y o lv,c i-°D a' O b°' n�N o W c H v and day visitors. The peninsula, which now has approximate) Q," '~ m me w a�m, mt c�3$E a`s•v a'C 5.200 full-time residents may have as many as 300,000 on oak a� ~ ca e m o W 3 c— >v y�'= m a' o weekends duringthe summer, p Co Lii ~ am m u no '"f0 °oca co a 5= Thank you very muchfor your consideration of these requests. �' M c� o n•= w a�m m s C o m r We will appreciate receiving a copy of the EIR report. �,.� wtiF co v,E. y ao,�3 p rna,C?d Yours respectfully, r.� LU N > =m c o O ar �, o- e r > W � .m.b1 c� S .c'o�= tLL'c cos s President '� Q Af P4<L�- 15 7D 5 CG Ale EXHIBIT II. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE CATEGORIES . .ease indicate your interests and items that should be NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM addressed in the proposed EIR. Category Comments This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice GEOLOGY/SOILS of Preparation. If more space is required or if you prefer a different format, please feel free to deviate !rom this foam as necessary. If you have input, please complete the form and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft EIR. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY 3 i Agency FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Mailing Address 24000 Avila Road City LAGUNA NIGUEL State CA Zip 92677 VEGETATION/WILDLIFE Coastal wetland habitats transected by trunk lines. Telephone ( 714 ) 831-4270 Migratory bird use of said wetlands. Endangered species use of said wetlands. Contact Person Jack M. Faucher Mitigation of impacts to fish and wildlife and their habitats. ARCHAEOLOGY/HISTORY LEVEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. [__] No interest (delete from distribution list) Q Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES © Major interest (state key areas of your concern): Q-4. ..a ... an 4 •.tif;r fich and wild reaewl'ees end measures for aypidin¢. mini,izin2- or eemnengating lnacPe rnactal uwtland RELEVANT LAND USE PLANNING habitats are high value and scarce. Corps of Engineers and California Coastal -Act permits may be necessary. PERMIT/REVIEW REQUIREMENTS Do .you or your agency have statutory permit authority or DEMOGRAPHY AND GROWTH DYNAMICS advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT AREA. If so, please list. Applicability Within Area of Concern Authority Project Area Trunk line crossings in TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Coastal Wetland habitats ea eWWi djife Coordination Act _ ppff ppc 8slangered Species hc1 Newport Bay Newport Slough Santa Ana River . Greenville-Banning Channel tL t EXHIBIT II. iW. IRONMENTAL ISSUE CATEGORIES NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM Please indicate your interests and items that should be addressed in the proposed EIR. Category Comments This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice GEOLOGY/SOILS of Preparation. If more space is required or if you prefer a different format, please feel free to deviate from this form as necessary. If you have input, please complete the form and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft EIR. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY Agency PACIFIC COAST AhCHAEO LCCICAL SCC=TY Mailing Address P.O. Box 10927, City Costa Vasa. Statd7a. Zip 92727 VEGETATION/WILDLIFE Telephone ( ) Contact Person President Pat Hammon daytime Bowers Foundation, 547-0696 Member, besearch Committee, Laura Mitchell 89}8907 1 ARCHAEOLOGY/HISTORY.Qualificaticas Of the archaeologist are important• L'VEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. Far confidentiality of an often �� resource, the archaeology report should be entialitot the E I.R.). 11m body cf the report should ccotaln the archaeologist's Inthe Appendices( for mitigation of impact, an any sites found.(If known sites mist be No interest (delete from distribution list) occasionally volunteer help such as college classes can be impacted if there le time, Solway III �834-4741) has a list of O.C. Certified obtained crag a Co. MIA, axohaeolo4sts. If the area is within [� Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) / � /� �b/� / j�/ �0� Commission boundaries, thenyoutal know the j (state key areas of our concern) : st will need to be qualified under the Society Of Professional �] Major interest y y archaeologi int,rest in archaeological site preservation, or if not possible, ArchasolWrtsts, (or possibly the JQuivalant, If_! understan" correctly).The mat should be obtainable through UCLA Inttitute of Archaeology, (Personal response, L.141tche as member proper handling of this nonrenewable resource. a search Committee). of P.C.A.5., and Chair—, RELEVANT LAND USE PLANNING (Permit requirements and project review•requirements should reflect concern fax archaeology, and eontology. We would be lL st in r:.2.a. porticos dealing with PERMIT/REVIEW REQUIREMENTS histcrp and history, and the appropriate appendices, protect maps and indices of the Arc`=.aologY r. .l Do .you or your agency have statutory permit authority or advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT AREA. If so, please list. eQntO1 should be eddrseeed. For comments, you might tio. We are a nonprofit volunteer organizations with professional expertise. liTi07fa1 Cemmenti the field of 1 „r a3Y a County, 14752 SkYPazk Blvd., Applicability Within contact the nrinNatU al 715,Hist 250-�2, or Cam Wallis, 644-5699. (L.H.) Area of Concern Authority Project Area suite 245. Ltvine 92715, Archaeology Citizen review Interest in sites wherever found, their TRANSPCRTATION/CIRCULATION presoriatio° & protection, or recovery of data by scientific means, then curation of artifacta tnd ecofacts in a proper manner, so that the knowledge gained may benefit educat-1 ca,knowledge. and displays about our prehistoric past cultures. D,sT s=� erR. EXHI�3IT T.I. Yes Maybe No NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X R. Aesthetics. W111 the proposal result in the This form is provided to assist in'responding to the Notice of Preparation. If more space is reou to the public or will the proposal result 1n ired or if you prefer obstruction of any scenic vista or view open a different format, please feel free to deviate from this form ,ut have i If you n the creation of an aesthetically offensive as necessary. Y p please complete the form site open to public view? X and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft S. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an EIR. Impact upon the quality or Quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X T Agency ,i.(ZVr�� UN��,f.n Sck„� 1�,•rrn,,.� T. Cultural Resources. Mailing address Z141 ALiow A*e 1. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric X City �(LYi►aE State C. 2ip 'L / or historic archaeological site? Telephone ( 7��{ ) 843^ I,ycl 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a Contact Person VAu,o prehistoric or historic building, X structure or object? 3. Does the proposal have the potential to LEVEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. cause a physical change which would- affect X- [ No interest (delete from distribution list) unique ethnic cultural values? �— Q blinor interest (retain name on distribution list) 4. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the X• [] Major interest (state keyareas of potential impact area? your concern) u. Mandatory Findings of Significance. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish PERMIT/REVIE:a REQUIREMENTS or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, Do .you or your agency have statutory permit authority or reduce the number or restrict the range advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT of a rare or endangered plant or animal, AREA. If so, please list. or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or X Applicability Within prehistory? Area of Concern Authority Project Area EXHIBIT II. EXHIBIT II. NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM EIR-SOUTH HALF OF DIS MCr NO. 6, MID DISIRICr ND. 5 This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice of Preparation. I£ more space is required or if you prefer of Preparation. If more space is required or if you prefer a different format, please feel free to deviate from this form a different format, please feel free to deviate !rom this form as necessary. If you have input, please complete the form as necessary. If you have input, please complete the form and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish and return; otherwise, it will be assumed that you do not wish to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft EIR. EIR. ) J Agency Costa Mesa Sanitary District Agency P.O. Box 1200 Mailing J� Mailing Address address 6O � City COSH Mesa State CA Zip 92626 City �'nS//} �fy�/} a/ / State�' _Zip Telephone ( 714 ) 754-5347 Telephone ( 7�) /(��o 'lpa3s / Contact Person Brw Matters Contact Person ��fli�/1l (�ILJi[�1' LEVEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. LZ—VEL OF INTEREST IN THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. No interest (delete from distribution list) CD No interest (delete from distribution list) 0 Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) � Minor interest (retain name on distribution list) Q Major interest (state key areas of your concern) : Q Major interest (state key areas of your concern) : PERf1IT/REVIEW REQUIREMENTS PER*fIT/REVIE:•J REQUIREMENTS Do .you or your agency have statutory permit authority or Do you or your agency have statutory permit authority or advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT AREA. If so, please list. AREA. If so, please list. Applicability Within Applicability within I Area of Concern Authority Project Area Area of Concern Authority Project Area j sqn of wa onnMan 9939 En,Caw4k Fa,Fro PACIFIC BELL_ ti+urm.Gw-a 92NU .:,i�9995FiS9 February 14, 1984 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 AT: Hilary Baker RE: EIR-Master Plan Report for County Sanitation District No.5 and south half of District No.6 Dear Hilary: This Is In reply to your letter dated December 22, 1983. regarding the impact of rehabilitation and construction of sewage collection systems in District 5 and the south half of District 6. We have reviewed the project areas and we do have cable facilities within these areas. However, without detailed plans of the construc- tion or rehabilitation that will be taking place, I am unable to determine the impact to our facilities. When plans are received, we will be able to give you a more complete Impact report. Very truly yours. 7 J. McCord Engineer, Liaison M1M/ep - - - r-- LF - I-- r- r r r - r t r r LF r r APPENDIX B J Archeological Report E u I u J I lJ L_.r Md tw Archaeological Resource Management Corp. ftw ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS SEARCH CONDUCTED FOR PORTIONS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 5 AND NO. 6 by: Uw MARIE COTTRELL ARCHAEOLOGIST tow hEd ENVIROSPHERE m, 3000 West MacArthur Boulevard Santa Ana, California 92704 Now ww December 15, 1983 tow ,�, 12942A Magnolia Street 0 Suite 65 0 Garden Grove, CA 92641 • (714) 750-0874 INTRODUCTION The following report presents the results of an archaeological records search conducted for portions of the County Sanitation Dis- tricts No. 5 and No. 6. The records search was completed by Marie Cottrell of Archaeological Resource Management Corpooration (ARMC) at the request of George Fitzpatrick of Envirosphere. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the areas of the proposed development contain any archaeological resources which could be nega- L, tively impacted by the construction of new gravity lines, forces mains, and pump stations. The records search was conducted using the taw records maintained by ARK for the Orange County area. These records are kept current with the records housed at the University of Cali- fornia, Los Angeles Archaeological Survey, the official state repos- Uzi itory for site records in Orange County. Proposed Construction Area: Southern Half of County Sanitation District No. 6 The sewer line in this vicinity which is close to the Bitter Point Pump Station follows a course which leaves Pacific Coast tow Highway close to Bench Mark No. 9 on the U.S.G.S. Newport Beach 7.5' Quadrangle flap and proceeds north and west paralleling an unnamed road which crosses the Mobil Oil Property and the oil fields located adjacent to the Santa Ana River Drainage. The records search for this portion of Sanitation District No. 6 indicated that the area had been previously surveyed for archaeological no, resources. The first survey completed for the study area encom- passed all of the area located in the flats associated with the tml Santa Ana River Basin. The survey was conducted by the University of California, Riverside Archaeological Research Unit (UCRARU) in 1975 for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Hall 1975) . As a result kow of this survey, three new archaeological sites were located, but MW boo -1- 6w WW not recorded in the general area of the proposed sewer line, and one previously recorded site, CA-Ora 148, was relocated. The three sites which were located during the 1975 survey were assigned tem- porary designations and were later recorded officially by Archaeolo- gical Associates Limited (AA) . The sites located in the gnereal vi- cinity of the current study area are: CA-Ora 844; CA-Ora 839; and CA-Ora 845 as is the previously recorded site CA-Ora 148. All of the sites were described in 1975 as being heavily impacted shell midden sites. The second archaeological survey conducted in the area occurred in 1979, when AA were retained by Mobil Oil Company to conduct an archaeological resources assessment for their property. Because UCRARU failed to officially record the sites located in 1975 and due to the very dense ground cover present for most of the study area not already heavily disturbed , AA failed to locate the previously `r identified sites. Due to the sensitivity of the area, however, they recommended that an archaeologist be present at the time of grading, and thus, they were able to locate CA-Ora 839 before it was destroyed. They also managed to locate the UCRARU report and record all of the sites on the property. AA also located an additional archeological �+ site in 1979 and recorded it as CA-Ora 843. CA-Ora 843 and CA-Ora 148 are the only two sites which are close enough to the proposed 6, construction area to be potentially negatively impacted by the pro- ject. AA tested both of these sites (Van Horn 1980) . The results of the initial tests indicated that site CA-Ora 148 had been destroyed Lehi by oil opeations on the property and was, therefore, of no further research value. CA-Ora 843, while it had been damaged by oil opera- tions, still retained intact midden which warranted protection. This site was subsequently fenced to protect it from further encroachment. I� WW 6W -2- In summary, CA-Ora 148 which was located on the bluff about 500 'c' feet to the north and east of Bench Mark No. 9 on the U.S.G.S. Newport Beach 7.5' Quadrangle Map has been destroyed by oil operations. The M' construction of the sewer line in this area will have no adverse im- pacts on this archaeological site. CA-Ora 843 which is located on the edge of the bluff approximately 200 feet to the northeast of the proposed construction area, has been fenced by Mobil Oil Company and Wd the current project should have no negative impacts on the archaeolo- gical site provided the fenced area is not violated by construction equipment. tw Proposed Gravity Line: Along Bayside Drive Trunk in Sanitation District No. 5 The records search for this area indicated that it had been surveyed for archaeological resources prior to its being developed. The first survey was carried out in 1912 by N.C. Nelson and a second in 1966 by the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society (PCAS) . No formal reports exist for these surveys, but notes taken by the surveyors are taw available and were used to ascertain the presence or absence of sites in this area. It should be noted that this area has been since inten- sely developed and little possibility exists for the presence of any archaeological resources. The early surveys did not find any archaeo- logical sites in this portion of Newport Beach and with subsequent development, there remains little possibility that any sites would remain to be impacted by construction activities. Proposed Gravity Lines and Force Mains: Bayside Drive to Reef Point along Pacific Coast Highway in Sanitation District No. 5 The records search for this portion of the study area indicates that all of the property to the east of Cameo Shores had been pre- viously surveyed for archaeological resources, but due to residential -3- Vrt development, the western portion (beginning with Cameo Shores) had not. The surveys conducted in the area include: 1 ) Survey by N. Nelson Leonard of the UCLA Archaeological 6r Survey in 1963. 2) Los Trancos-Moro Canyons Survey by Archaeological Research I ' Inc. in 1972-3. 3) Irvine Coastal Survey by Archaeological Research Inc. in 1977. 4) Survey by State Department of Parks and Recreation for Crystal Cove State Park in 1980. low 5) Irvine Coastal Survey by Larry Seeman and Associates in 1981 . As a result of these surveys, five sites have been identified in close proximity to the proposed construction areas. Four of these could be in the direct impact zone, and one is in an area L where it might be indirectly impacted by construction activities. Direct Impact Area Sites I CA-Ora 1 is located at Crystal Cove on the south side of Pacific Coast Highway. This site was offically recorded by Briggs in 1949 based on information gleaned from the WPA survey conducted under the 6vJ direction of Winterbourne in the 1930's. It is possible that the site was first discovered by Herman Strandt in the 1920's. This site is L described as a partially intact shell midden site which yielded a well made mortar and fragments of metates. When plans are finalized for the construction project, this site should be checked in the field to ascertain its relationship to the construction area and to deter- mine impacts, if any. If the site is to be impacted by the construc- 6n) tion project, it will require a test level investigation to ascertain its significance prior to finalizing any mitigation measures. I f -4- MW CA-Ora 665 is located on the bluff edge approximately 300 feet from the southwest corner of Cameo Shores development boundary. The site was located in 1977 during the Archaeological Research Inc. survey conducted for the Irvine Company and is described as a roughly oval shaped shell midden with occasional flakes. Artifacts observed included shellfish remains, cores, and debitage. This site, if it is to be impacted by construction, will require a test level investiga- tion to ascertain its significance prior to the formulation of any final mitigation recommendations. CA-Ora 965 is located 200 meters northwest of Tri-Star Company parking lot, between State Highway 1 and the bluff overlooking the ocean. The site was located by State Department of Parks and Recrea- tion personnel in 1980 and described as a shallow grayish midden with moderate flake and shell scatter. This particular site is located at the teminus of the southernmost proposed gravity line. It is not certain at this time whether the site is going to be impacted by the construction of the gravity line. The site should be field checked when plans are finalized for the gravity line, and if it is within the direct impact zone, it should be tested to ascertain its signi- ficance prior to making any final mitigation recommendations. CA-Ora 246 is located directly north of the fenceline which borders the north side of Pacific Coast Highway at the mouth of Los Trancos Canyon. The site was originally recorded by PCAS members Robinson and McKinney in 1967 as a prehistoric site. In 1977 this site was relocated during the Archaeological Research Inc. survey ®' and was described as primarily a historic deposit, possibly dating to the 1940's. This site should be re-examined when construction tw plans are finalized to determine whether it will be negatively impacted, and what the best course of action should be regarding .a it preservation. -5- i I.r Secondary Impact Area Site CA-Ora 130 was recorded by N. Nelson Leonard in 1963 and was v subsequently excavated by students from Orange Coast and Saddleback Colleges as well as by archaeologists from the State Department of Parks and Recreation (Barter 1983; Cottrell et al 1983) . This site is located 200 feet to the east of the terminus of the gravity line i.i near the Cameo Shores Pump Station. This site while it has been excavated may still be adversely impacted by equipment during the construction of the sewer line. It is recommended that the site be fenced or flagged off during construction to avoid any adverse impacts to the site. SUMMARY The proposed construction of gravity lines, force mains, and pump stations in Sanitation District No. 6 should have no adverse impacts on any archaeological resources, but in Sanitation District i.► No. 5, there may negative impacts to five archaeological sites. Four of these appear to be in the direct zone of impact, although it is difficult to confirm this deduction based on the level of plans available. It is recommended that these sites be surveyed in the field when detailed plans are available to determine impacts. If any of these sites are to be adversely effected by the project, they will require a test level investigation to ascertain their signifi- cance prior to the formulation of final mitigation measures. The i one site which may be indirectly impacted by construction should also be checked in the field when more detailed plans are available to determine potential secondary impacts. The site, if it is in close proximity to, but not in the construction area, may be flagged or fenced to protect it from equipment damage. i -6- - W& too As the entire region of the proposed construction project is sensitvie archaeologically, it is recommended that construction be monitored by a qualified archaeologist in both the developed and undeveloped areas, in the event that buried archaeological deposits are uncovered. These deposits, if found, will need to be evaluated to determine their significance prior to any further destruction. REFERENCES Barter, Eloise Richards 1983 CA-Ora . 130 and CA-Ora 323: 1982 California Department of Parks and Recreation Excavations. In Coastal Bluff Sites at Crystal Cove State Park, State of California Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation June 1983. Cottrell , Marie et al 1983 CA-Ora 130: A Multi-component Campsite located on the Coastal Bluffs of the Southern California Coast. In Coastal Bluff Sites at Crystal Cove State Park, State of California, Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation, June 1983. Hall , Mathew C. 1975 Santa Ana River Project Description and Evalutation Cultural Resources Appendices: Field Data. By Arch- aeological Research Unit, University of California, Riverside for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. Van Horn, David 1979 Archaeological Survey Report: Mobil Oil Land, Near Costa Mesa, in County of Orange, California. 1980 Archaeological Posthole Testing Report: CA-Ora 148 and Ora 843, on Mobil Oil Land, Near Costa Mesa, Orange County two California. WW -7- APPENDIX c • Traffic Report �i LJ t:J u i f U U 7 u u u I u u u C� churn warn associates Transportation Planning *Traffic Engineering February 10 , 1984 Mr . Hal Schneider Envirosphere Company 3000 West MacArthur Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92704 Dear Mr. Schneider: We are pleased to present this traffic impact analysis of the proposed County of Orange Sanitation District 5, and the south half of District 6 Sewage Collection Master Plan Amendments. This report summarizes our methodology, analysis, findings, and recommended mitigation measures. We trust that the findings, which are summarized in the front of the report and include the mitigation measures, will be of immediate as well as continuing value to you and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County in evaluating the project's traffic impacts. It has been a pleasure to serve your needs on this project. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, and KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES William Kunzman, P.E. #593 4664 earranca Parkway * Irvine, CA 92714 * (714) 559-4231 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1. Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - Existing Traffic Conditions - Project Impacts - Mitigation Measures 2. Project Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Location ego - Proposed Project 3. Existing Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - Existing Travel Lanes - Existing Intersection Controls - Daily Traffic Volumes - Existing Daily Volume to Capacity Ratios - Individual Project Alignments 4. Project Traffic Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - Construction Impacts - Long Term Project Impact 5. Guidelines To Minimize Traffic Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . 14 two Appendix am Appendix A - Manual of Traffic Controls tw a" wo low do Ira I.r LIST OF FIGURES Following Figure No. Title Page No. i.0 1 Master Plan of Sewer Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 Existing Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 tow bw Iiaw I W W W 1�.1 u u , f LIST OF TABLES u Table No. Title Page No. 1 Daily Roadway Capacity Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 f u i �.i U i I u . f u f U.) f County Sanitation Districts 5 and 5 of Orange County low Sewer Collection Master Plan 099 Traffic Impact Report This report contains the traffic impact analysis for proposed additions and rehabilitation projects to the trunk sewer system to County Sanitation District 5 and the south half of District 6 of Orange County. County Sanitation Districts 5 and 6 are located in the central coastal portion of Orange County, and proposed Sewage Collection Master Plan corrections are generally located along the coastal areas in the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company Coastal Area. The proposed master plan corrections include 4 new gravity and force main line improvements. two The traffic report contains documentation of existing traffic conditions, and assessment of project traffic impacts and the development of guidelines to minimize construction phase traffic impacts. Each of these topics is contained in a separate section of the report. The first section is "Findings", and subsequent sections expand upon the findings. In this way, information on any particular aspect of the study can be easily located by the reader. d Low 1. FINDINGS This section summarizes the existing traffic conditions, project traffic impacts, and the proposed mitigation measures. Existing Traffic Conditions i a. Proposed County Sanitation District 5 and the south half of District 6 sewage lines to be added to the Sewage Collection Master Plan will be located primarily in existing public roadway right-of-way. +�.+ b. Future sewage line additions and rehabilitation projects are generally located along existing roadways which carry traffic and provide access to adjacent land uses. c. The roadways along the future sewage line additions and rehabilitation projects are generally fully improved and include curbs and gutters, public street lighting, and signalized intersection controls. a.� d. Portions of the roadway system along the sewage line alignments are heavily travelled on .a daily basis, and exceed daily volume to capacity ratios based on the existing number of through travel lanes. Project Impacts a. Implementation and rehabilitation of the sewage lines to correct for existing Master Plan deficiencies will require the excavation of existing public roadways for sewage line w+ placement. b. Significant impacts in terms of traffic congestion and changes to present patterns of circulation could result, particularly if traffic mitigation measures are not incorporated into the construction process. c. Implementation of specific sewage line construction traffic mitigation measures, such as tunneling or restricted hours of construction, can significantly minimize the project �► construction impacts on existing traffic volumes. d. Improper traffic control techniques and signing could potentially result in hazards to traffic during project construction . 2 OW e. From a traffic engineering perspective, the proposed sewage system improvements will have no direct long term impacts in terms of the generation or additional traffic or modifying existing traffic flow , once the proposed system modifications are installed. Mitigation Measures a. Traffic Control Plans should be prepared prior to the construction phase of each sewage line project as implementation proceeds. b. Traffic Control Plans should consider the ability of alternative routes to carry existing traffic volumes and identify the hours of construction, construction site truck access routes, and the type and location of warning signs, lights, and other traffic control devices. c. The County Sanitation District should attempt to comply with traffic control requirements as identified by the local jurisdictions to the maximum extent possible. d. The construction technique for the implementation and rehabilitation of the proposed sewage lines, such as tunneling, cut and cover with partial street closure, or cut and cover with full street closure, should include consideration of the ability of the roadway system, both the street in question and alternate routes, to carry existing traffic volumes during project construction. e. Public streets should be generally kept operational during construction, particularly in the morning and evening peak hours of traffic. f. Public roadways should be restored to their existing condition after project construction is completed. g. Traffic Controls Plans should comply with the Manual of Traffic Controls as published by CalTrans, to minimize any traffic hazards which may exist during project construction . 3 i E0 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION �.r This section discusses the project's location and proposed development. Figure 1 illustrates the overall plan. Location I.r The proposed Master Plan of Sewer Collection for the County Sanitation District 5 and the south half of District 6 for the County of Orange is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows both +.r existing and proposed system corrections to the Sanitation Districts Master Plans. County Sanitation Districts 5 and 6 are located in the central coastal portion of the County of Orange , and the proposed sewage collection Master Plans are generally located along the coastal areas of the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company Coastal Area. Proposed Project The proposed project will include proposed corrections to the +� existing Sewer Master Plans in County Sanitation District 5 and the south half of District 6 . New projects and the rehabilitation of existing lines being recommended are shown in Figure 1 and are listed below: New Projects i A. Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer B. Bayside/Crystal Cove Trunk Sewer C. Cameo Shores Extension Sewer v D. Cameo Shores Relief Sewer Rehabilitation Projects E. Coast Trunk Sewer - Lido Station Connection F. Coast Trunk Sewer - Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station G. Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point to Bitter Point Pump Station H. Coast Trunk Sewer - Bitter Point Pump Station to Santa Ana River I. Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point Pump Station to Santa Ana River J. Balboa Trunk Sewer Precise alignments for the implementation of these sewage Master Plan corrections are not available at the time of this writing, although the general alignments of the proposed lines are as shown in Figure 1. Proposed sewage correction lines will be `�' located in existing public right-of-way to the maximum extent 4 Lod feasible. Existing public right-of-way will consist of existing public roadway right-of-way, and existing public parks and side slope easements. From a traffic engineering perspective, the proposed system improvements will have no direct long term impacts in terms of the generation of additional traffic or modifying existing traffic flow, once the proposed system corrections are installed. However, significant impacts to the roadway system may occur during the construction phase of the project. Because many of the system corrections are proposed to be implemented within the existing public roadway right-of-way, excavation of existing public roadways and traffic management of existing traffic volumes will be required. tod taw MW tw No L-W 5 Figure 1 ents Master Plan of Sewer imProvern ' • � OI{W11N�� �� r . . N t 1 ��'�'/ "`i , y.•, 4 ` 1 _ rMOPE ' ~ �/e {11�' f T • f/yttoM N q yj SlGWt 1 \\, : •�• If' �t` { „• Q' IIM{I ft.JfOY Pump • i + u' $JAI AT • � it �t t• `�pp wrr .. `�► ��+.n�Yn~frwJ. N'J fr^ {iN I.tr7 � .�.✓ttwiwN �• � tf• �fiftlGN A d 3. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The traffic conditions for all of the roadways along the proposed sewage system alignments, as the exist today, g y g y y, are discussed below. Existing roadway conditions along the proposed sewage master plan corrections are shown in Figure 2. Existing roadway conditions data is presented for each individual project and is discussed below for each roadway section. Existing Travel Lanes The number of through lanes for the existing roadways are identified. Also identified is whether the roadways are divided or undivided. For divided roadways, whether the median is a raised concrete median or a striped median on the roadway is also shown. Roadways inventoried are generally fully improved with sidewalks, curbs and gutters and roadway lighting fixtures, unless otherwise noted. �+ Existing Intersection Controls Existing intersection controls are shown in Figure 1. Intersection controls are for traffic on the arterial alignment. Intersection controls are primarily traffic signals although some stop sign controls have been identified. Daily Traffic Volumes The average daily two-way traffic volumes for the individual roadway segments are shown in the respective figures. Traffic volumes were obtained from the City of Newport Beach and County of Orange Environmental Management Agency and are based on Winter, 1982 traffic volume flow data. It should also be noted that many of the roadways in the area such as East Coast Highway, West Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, and Balboa Boulevard, experience significant increases in daily traffic volumes in the summer months due to recreational travel. Existing Daily Volume to Capacity Ratios Roadway capacity is generally defined as the number of vehicles which can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of road in a given time period. Congestion, high accident rates, the quality of traffic flow (Level of Service) , and environmental acceptability all come into play in defining a particular roadway's effective capacity. It is possible to identify maximum desirable volumes for typical roadway types based on the number of roadway travel lanes. These daily volumes reflect estimates of the amount of daily traffic which will result in peak hour m traffic volumes equal to the maximum desirable capacity of each ,a, 6 1 �.r Ir roadway type. The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency has developed "maximum desirable volumes" for each roadway type depicted on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. The "maximum desirable volumes", or daily roadway capacities, for j each type of roadway classification are given in Table 1. ► By dividing existing daily traffic volumes by the daily roadway capacities listed above, existing daily volume to capacity ratios a; have been calculated. Daily volume to capacity ratios are based on a Level of Service C. As may be seen by reviewing the respective figures, several individual segments of the existing roadways along the the proposed alignments are currently operating near or above capacity. Individual Project Alignments Additional information for the existing conditions on the individual project alignments are discussed below: A. Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer: The City of Newport Beach is the local Jurisdictional agency for the proposed project along Bayside Drive. Bayside Drive is a two lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour between Jamboree Road and E1 Paseo Drive. Bayside Drive has numerous horizontal curves and limited sight visibility �•► along its route. Frequent direct residential access occurs on the Newport Bay side of Bayside Drive and a steep side slope is located on the inland side. Bike lanes are located on both sides of the roadway while parking is only permitted on the inland side. � f B. Bayside/Crystal Cove Trunk Sewer : Proposed systems correction sewer improvements are to be located along Bayside Drive and East Coast Highway. The local jurisdictions are the City of Newport Beach and the County 6J of Orange, although East Coast Highway is State Highway 1 and maintained by CalTrans. Bayside Drive between Carnation Avenue and Marguerite Avenue is a two lane undivided roadway. Bayside Drive is posted with a 30 mile per hour speed limit and is constructed with curbs and gutters. Parking is prohibited along portions of Bayside Drive. Adjacent land uses include a local park area and occasional residential dwellings with direct site access. l � East Coast Highway is a four lane divided roadway and is �► constructed with raised medians, striped medians, and striped medians with raised channelized turn pockets at the intersections. Adjacent land uses include the Corona Del Mar commercial area , residential development, and undeveloped parcels , although direct site access is infrequent. Through the City of Newport Beach, East Coast Highway is constructed with curbs and gutters, and parking 7 is permitted on both sides of the roadway through the commercial areas. Posted speed limits are 35 miles per hour through the commercial areas, 45 miles per hour through the area with adjacent residential uses, and 55 miles per hour through the undeveloped areas. South of Newport Beach, East w, Coast Highway is constructed with paved shoulders. Bike lanes are provided along its route and although parking is permitted on the coastal side, it is prohibited along the inland side. Access to adjacent commercial stands and beach parking area is infrequent and striped turning lanes are typically provided. C. Cameo Shores Extension Sewer: The proposed extension project is located in the County of Orange jurisdiction, although it will be connected to an existing sewer in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed extension will connect to an existing sewer located along Brighton Road. Brighton - Road is a local roadway in the private community of Cameo Shores. Brighton Road is posted with a 25 mile per hour speed limit, is fully improved with curbs and gutters, and provides direct residential driveway access to dwellings located along the coastal side. The major portion of the extension sewer is to be located south of the Cameo Shores community. This area is undeveloped at present and has no improved roadways which would be impacted by its implementation. D. Cameo Shores Relief Sewer: The Cameo Shores Relief Sewer provides for a force main sewer connection from Brighton Road to East Coast Highway. The proposed line is located in the vicinity of Milford Drive in the Cameo Shores private community. The local jurisdiction is the City of Newport Beach. Milford Drive is a two lane undivided roadway with direct residential access on one side which serves approximately existing 20 dwelling units. Milford Drive is fully improved with curbs and gutters, and although 'on a grade, has intersections with seven low volume residential roadways in the Cameo Shores development. E. Coast Trunk Sewer - Lido Station Connection : The local jurisdiction is the City of Newport Beach although West Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard north of the Coast Highway are maintained by CalTrans. Newport Boulevard is constructed as a four lane divided roadway with a raised median although it narrows to a four lane undivided overcrossing of West Coast Highway. Parking is generally prohibited along this narrow section of Newport Boulevard although some parking is permitted in sections to service adjacent commercial land uses. The posted speed limit on Newport Boulevard is 30 miles per hour and the roadway is improved with curbs, gutter and sidewalks. 8 1 v F. Coast Trunk Sewer - Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station: West Coast Highway is designated as State Highway 1 and is maintained by CalTrans although this section of roadway is located in the City of Newport Beach. Ultimate curbs and gutter have been constructed and parking is generally prohibited along the roadway. The striped median provides ira for an optional left turn lane, primarily to service commercial uses on the inland side of the roadway. West Coast Highway is posted with a 40 mile per hour speed limit. G. Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point to Bitter Point Puma Stations: West Coast Highway is maintained by CalTrans and the local jurisdiction is the City of Newport Beach. West Coast Highway is posted with a 35 mile per hour speed limit south of Newport Boulevard, and the posted speed limit is 45 miles per hour to the north. South of Newport Boulevard, the roadway is presently constructed with three northbound travel lanes and two southbound travel lanes. Parking is i permitted on both sides of the roadway to serve adjacent commercial uses. West Coast Highway narrows to a four lane undivided roadway at its undercrossing of Newport Boulevard. North of Newport Boulevard, curbs and gutters are typically only constructed on the bayside of the roadway and parking is generally prohibited. tir H. Coast Trunk Sewer - Bitter Point Pump Station to Santa Ana Jro River: The existing sewer alignment is located in a presently undeveloped area north of the Newport Shores community. The local jurisdiction for the project is the County of Orange. Due to the fact that this project is located outside of existing public roadways in an undeveloped area, no roadways would be impacted by its rehabilitation. I. Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point Pump Station to Santa Ana River: As sewer rehabilitation projects are proposed to be phased in their implementation, this project is a rehabilitation project in addition to those previously specified. The existing roadway conditions for this project have been previously identified for Project G Coast Trunk Sewer - Rocky Point to Bitter Point Pump Stations and Project H, Coast Trunk Sewer - Bitter Point to the Santa Ana River. J. Balboa Trunk Sewer: Rehabilitation of the existing sewer is located in the City of Newport Beach. The existing sewer +� line is located along Newport Boulevard between the the Lido Pump Station and Balboa Boulevard, and Balboa Boulevard from Newport Boulevard to G Street. Newport Boulevard is fully improved with curbs, gutters and sidewalks as a four lane roadway with raised and striped IAW I..W aw Iwo medians. Parking on Newport Boulevard is generally permitted south of 32nd Street. Between 30th Street and 23rd Street, Newport Boulevard operates as a one-way couplet system. For each travel direction as a one-way couplet, two through travel lanes are provided and parking is permitted on both sides of the street. Newport Boulevard is posted with a 30 mile per hour speed limit and adjacent uses are generally commercial. Substantial raised channelization for traffic control is constructed in the vicinity of the Newport Boulevard/Balboa Boulevard intersection. Balboa Boulevard between Newport and Alvarado is constructed with a raised median and parallel parking is provided both in the median and adjacent to the curb lane for both directions of travel. Curbside parallel parking is also generally provided from Alvarado to G Street. The posted speed- limit on Balboa Boulevard is 25 miles per hour. - Balboa Boulevard is constructed with ultimate curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and adjacent uses include residential , commercial , church, school, and public uses. Both Newport Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard experience significant traffic volume increases and peaking during the summer months. •a a 10 1.,+ Table 1 DAILY ROADWAY CAPACITY ESTIMATES Facility Lane Maximum Daily Vehicle Volume Type Configuration Level of Level of Service C Service D Freeway 10 Lane-Divided - 175,000 8 Lane-Divided - 145, 000 6 Lane-Divided - 115, 000 4 Lane-Divided - 65, 000 Major Arterial 8 Lane-Divided 60,000 66, 000 6 Lane-Divided 45, 000 49 ,500 Primary Arterial 4 Lane-Divided 30,000 33, 000 Secondary Arterial 4 Lane-Undivided 20,000 22 ,000 Commuter Highway 2 Lane-Undivided 10,000 12, 500 i i Source: Orange County Environmental Management Agency April 20 , 1981 memo from J. Bennett to W. Zaun. fi Iu s 1{ II T w i � led I ss+ 11 I ii 6W Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions V or San loa b)n Ntt/s Goad m f or h a a A v 1 N East Coast Highway v` 4D•R/30/1.00 -v 40-R/34/113 4D-S/25/.83 a 2U/9/.90 $ Q 21.1/3/.30 2U/.5/.O o � ns/na/na kl h C) �^^-- Road P A C I F I C O C E A N Leggnd _ Number of Through S-Striped Daily Traffic Volume to 40 S/23/.77 Travel Lanes -R-Raised / Wlume Capacity D-Divided U•UndivKW Median (100015) Ratio Traffic Signal to Stop Sign 0 - Four Wev Stop na - Data Not Available - Proposed Sewer Improvement `�Cun3rnotl .�r,r;nc�in(c�; Figure 2A Existing Traffic Conditions ne/na/na r�r h .o. a � i 4D-S/39/1.30 h, 50-R/52/t39 % 3 p 8D-R/54/t20 4. 4D-S/51/M ��e 4D-S/52/t73Q PACIFIC OCEAN p 4U/20/1!00V 4D-R/20/,87 2e/10!50 4D-R/22473 4D-R/18480 Number of Through S-Striped Daily Traffic volume to 4D•S/23/.77 Travel Lanes —R•Raised / Volume Capacity 4D-R/12/.40 2U/8480 U D-Divided -Undivided Median (1000's) Ratio 4U/12480 * One Way Couplet ...,.. 0 - Traffic Signal -" • Stop Sign op • Four Wav Slop na - Data Not Available ® - Proposed .Sewer Improvement ..ti 4. PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS Discussed below are the project traffic impacts. Project impacts during the construction phase of the project and the long term project traffic impacts are identified. Construction Impacts The primary impact of the proposed project will occur during the construction and rehabilitation of the proposed sewage lines. y Placement of the sewage lines will require the excavation of some portion of the roadway, although tunneling in some sections may also occur. Significant impacts in terms of traffic congestion and changes to present patterns of circulation could result, particularly if no traffic mitigation measures are implemented. In addition, improper traffic control techniques and warning signs could potentially result in hazards to traffic during project construction. Impacts to existing traffic volumes can be minimized by varying construction techniques on a road segment by road segment basis. Potential construction techniques which can be implemented which would reduce traffic volume impacts include tunneling under busy intersections, restricted hours of construction, and construction within the median area. Guidelines for the identification of project construction techniques and other project construction .� issues are discussed further in Section 5 of this report. To minimize traffic hazards which may exist during project construction, Traffic Control Plans should be prepared which comply with the Manual of Traffic Controls as published by CalTrans. Properly prepared Traffic Control Plans will alert drivers to potential roadway hazards as they enter construction area, and provide for clear identification on how to proceed safely through the construction area. For reference purposes, the Manual of Traffic Controls has been included as Appendix A of this report. Traffic Control Plans should be prepared prior to the construction phase of each sewage line project, on a project by project basis, as implementation proceeds. Traffic Control Plans should consider the ability of alternative routes to carry existing traffic volumes and identify the hours of construction, and the construction site truck access routes, too and the type and location of warning signs, lights and other traffic control devices. The County Sanitation District should coordinate with local and other appropriate jurisdictions in the W-0 preparation of the Traffic Control Plans and identification of construction techniques. The County Sanitation District should attempt to comply with traffic control requirements as identified by the appropriate jurisdictions to the maximum extent possible. 12 I )1 IIY The construction phase of the project will generate some additional daily traffic volumes to the construction site on a daily basis. The additional traffic generated will include employee trips, and transport of equipment and materials to the site. Relative to the existing daily traffic volumes on the roadways on which construction is proposed, the additional construction project site traffic generation will be negligible. i Long Term Project Impact Upon project construction completion, the roadways will be restored to their existing conditions in terms of roadway geometrics and intersection controls. From a traffic engineering perspective, the proposed sewage system improvements will have no direct long term impacts in terms of the generation of y additional traffic or modifying existing traffic flow, once the proposed system is installed . i ' 1 r� i 13 5. GUIDELINES TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC IMPACTS In this section guidelines are provided for ways to reduce traffic impacts during project construction and rehabilitation. More stringent measures are needed on crowded streets than on lightly traveled streets. As such, separate sets of guidelines are recommended for streets with different ranges of volume to capacity ratios. As identified in Existing Conditions (Section 3) of this report, several existing roadway sections are currently exceeding daily roadway capacity. These* critical roadways which currently exceed daily roadway capacity are East Coast Highway between Marguerite Avenue and Cameo Shores Road , West Coast Highway between Dover Drive and the Santa Ana River, and Newport Boulevard between West Coast Highway and Via Lido. Also of concern, however, is Bayside Drive between E1 Paseo Drive and Jamboree Road. This roadway section currently operates at 90 percent of daily roadway capacity. Heavy use on most of these roadways in the summer months should also be considered. �v For these roadway sections the following construction techniques should be considered to minimize the impacts of project construction: 1. Tunnel under busy adjacent intersections. 2. Restrict construction hours to night time only and provide for the full number of travel lanes during the day light hours. 3. Where feasible, locate sewage lines within the public right- of-way but outside of the roadway. 4. Where feasible, locate the sewage line along the centerline and provide for the existing number of travel lanes. 5. Eliminate existing on-street parking. 6. Relocate the sewage line to a less busy adjacent roadway where feasible. 7. When feasible, plan project construction to occur during the winter months and restrict construction between June and September when heavy recreational use occurs. 14 i Although all of the above strategies are feasible for roadways operating between 0.70 and 0. 90 a volume to capacity ratio, listed below are some additional strategies which are considered to be capable of adequately servicing traffic volumes in this range. 6u� 1. Restricted hours of construction to off peak hours only; i.e., no construction from 7: 00 to 9: 00 AM or 4: 00 to 6: 00 PM. 2. Reduce the number of through travel lanes at midblock locations. 3. Full street closure during night time hours except to service local access traffic. Listed below are several additional construction techniques which will satisfactorily service traffic volumes within the 0.30 to 0.70 traffic volume range. 1. Restripe existing roadways to eliminate a striped median . 2. Provide no restrictions on the hours of construction. For roadway segments with volume to capacity ratios of less than , 0.30, the following construction techniques are anticipated to be acceptable to service existing traffic volumes. 1. Street closure for construction except to service local traffic and where feasible alternative parallel routes exist. 2. No hours of construction restrictions. The appropriate construction techniques for each project should be evaluated on a project by project basis. The construction technique and method to control traffic should be incorporated into the Traffic Control Plan to be prepared for each roadway segment. Traffic Control Plans should be coordinated with the appropriate local jurisdiction and the County Sanitation Districts should attempt to comply with the traffic control requirements as identified by the local jurisdictions to the maximum extent possible. w 15 �.YI ,;, Lwd " APPENDIX A MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROLS cmd APPENDIX Appendix A - Manual of Traffic Controls um THIS MANUAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S OFFICE Um mm •k BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Distriets Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: r ' Area e JOINT BOARDS 9540-210 62-241114 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MARCH 14, 1984 - 7:30 P .M. ALL DISTRICTS (16) (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 8970 issued to White, Fine & Verville to provide assistance in obtaining legislation for the research project for deep ocean disposal of sludge, extending the term of said services through calendar year 1984, at no increase in the total authorized compensation of $100,000.00 DISTRICT 2 (19) (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to file necessary legal actions to order Arrowhead Linen, former Industrial Waste Permittee No. 2-195, to cease and desist from further discharge to the District' s sewerage system for violation of the District's ordinance re discharging without a permit and for breaching the Agreement for Deferred Payment of Delinquent Invoices, as recommended by the General Counsel MARCH 14, 1984 JOINT CHAIRMAN' S REPORT STATUS OF 301 ( H) ,'JAIVER LAST MONTH, JIM ANDERSON, THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER ('v WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, APPEARED BEFORE US ii1AT FHE DISTRICT' S 3O1 ( H) WAIVER HEARING WAS DELAYED FROM FEBRUARY 10 TU APRIL 13, SO THAT SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EPA AND HIS AGENCY COULD BE IRONED OUT WITH REGARD TO THE OCEAN MONITORING. ENCLOSED IN THE DIRECTOR' S FOLDERS TONIGHT IS A MEMORANDUM DATED HARCH 9 WHICH WAS ISSUED BY MR. ANDERSON TO THE REGIONAL WATER (QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ON THE STATUS OF THE 301 ( H) PERMIT FOR THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. THE NEW SCHEDULE WHICH IS ON THE BACK OF THE MEMORANDUM PROPOSES A JOINT EPA/REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD HEARING ON JULY 13. IN A TELEPHONE CONVERSATION TODAY, MR. ANDERSON ADVISED THAT THIS IS A DRAWN-OUT SCHEDULE WHICH COULD BE SHORTENED ONCE HE HAS RECEIVED EPA' s MONITORING PROPOSAL , AS OF TODAY, EPA HAS NOT GIVEN THE REGIONAL BOARD THE MONITORING PROGRAM THEY WISH THE DISTRICTS TO IMPLEMENT . NEEDLESS TO SAY, OUR STAFF HAS NOT SEEN IT EITHER. MR. HARPER AND I ARE MEETING IN SAN FRANCISCO WITH THE EPA REGION 9 DIRECTOR OF WATER PROGRAMS TOMORROW IN AN EFFORT TO MOVE THIS PROCESS ALONG. REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS FOR OFF-SITE REUSE/DISPOSAL OF DISTRICTS' DEWATERED SLUDGE ON MARCH 30 THE NATIONALLY ADVERTISED RFP' S FOR THE REUSE AND DISPOSAL OF OUR DISTRICTS SLUDGE ARE DUE. 108 INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS HAVE TAKEN OUT THE PROPOSAL SPECIFICATIONS. IT IS MY INTENTION TO APPOINT A COMMITTEE OF 5 DIRECTORS TO REVIEW THE PROMISING PROPOSALS FOLLOWING SCREENING BY DISTRICTS' STAFF . I WILL APPOINT THIS COMMITTEE ON APRIL 11 . I WOULD APPRECIATE IF THOSE DIRECTORS WHO WISH TO SERVE ON THAT COMMITTEE WOULD CONTACT ME. MEETING WITH CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY RE ULTIMATE SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. I , ALONG WITH STAFF, MET WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY INCLUDING DIRECTOR BARBARA BROWN ON MARCH 6 TO DISCUSS THE STATUS OF THE DISTRICTS' ULTIMATE SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS WELL AS THE DISTRICTS' ODOR CONTROL STUDY AND THE FUTURE .JOINT WORKS PROPOSED FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT AT OUR FACILITY HERE IN FOUNTAIN VALLEY, SUBSEQUENTLY, I RECEIVED A FORMAL COMMUNICATION FROM MAYOR MARVIN ADLER RELATIVE TO THE SCREEN CHECK DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIS/EIR FOR ULTIMATE SLUDGE DISPOSAL . A COPY OF THIS FORMAL RESPONSE FROM THE CITY WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CONSULTANT ENGAGED BY THE DISTRICTS TO PREPARE THE SUPPLEMENTAL EIS/EIR FOR INCLUSION INTO THE DOCUMENT. . MISCELLANEOUS ON MARCH 13 I HAD THE PLEASURE OF MAKING A PRESENTATION ABOUT THE SANITATION DISTRICTS TO APPROXIMATELY 600 MEMBERS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY REALTORS INVESTMENT ASSOCIATION IN ANAHEIM . I WAS ABLY ASSISTED BY RAY YOUNG OF THE DISTRICTS' STAFF . RESOLUTION COMMMENDING V.A. HEIM, RETIRING ORANGE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER VIC HEIM IS RETIRING THIS MONTH AFTER 37 YEARS OF SERVICE WITH THE COUNTY. IN HIS CAPACITY OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER HE HAS ALSO SERVED THE SANITATION DISTRICTS AS EX-OFFICIAL AUDITOR-CONTROLLER. I WOULD LIKE TO OFFER A RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION BY OUR BOARDS COMMENDING VIC FOR HIS FINE SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE OVER THE YEARS TO OUR DISTRICTS AND HIS OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE OF ORANGE COUNTY. READ ATTACHED RESOLUTION. RESOLUTION NO. 84-41 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5; 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING V. A. HEIM FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTION AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS THE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE WHEREAS, V. A. HEIM, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, HAS ANNOUNCED HIS RETIREMENT AFTER 37 YEARS OF SERVICE; AND, WHEREAS, V. A. HEIM HAS ALSO SERVED AS EX-OFFICIO AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY; AND, WHEREAS, V. A. HEIM, DURING HIS TENURE OF OFFICE: HAS EXHIBITED THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL AND ETHICAL CONDUCT AND `,AS SET AN OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE FOR ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS; AND, HAS DEVOTED MANY HOURS AND MUCH ENERGY TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND PROFICIENT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; AND, HAS MADE A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO THE EFFICIENT OPERATION OF GOVERNMENT IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE; AND, HAS BEEN A FAIR AND PLEASANT PERSON WITH WHOM TO WORK AND A GOOD FRIEND OF ALL THE PEOPLE WORKING WITH THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED: THAT THE DIRECTORS AND STAFF OF THE JOINT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY HEREBY COMMEND AND EXPRESS TO V. A. HEIM THEIR SINCERE AND HONEST APPRECIATION FOR HIS DEDICATED AND MERITORIOUS PUBLIC SERVICE AND CONSCIENTIOUS EFFORT EXPENDED ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY. PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 14, 1984. MEETING DATE March 14, 1984 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (CRANK). . . . . . . .HANSON. . . . . . ✓ (MAC ALLISTER).BAILEY. . . . . . ✓ (LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET. . . . . . ✓ �PERRY) ADLER). . . . . . . .BROWN. . . . . . .(HOESTEREY). . . .SALTARELLI . . ✓ NELSON) . . . . . . .000PER. . . .. .(WIEDER). . . . . . .6i� . . . . .� . . . . . . . .CUL`/ER. . . . . .�C DISTRICT (HOESTEREY) . . . . EDGAR. . . . . . . _� (OLSON) . . . . . . . .FINLAYSON. , ._� (SEIDEL). . . . . . .FRESE. . . . . . . _� (MURPHY). . . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . . ✓ (RISNER). . . . . . . GRGAS. . . . . . . _� 'OVERHOLT). . , . .ROTH. . , , . . . . ✓ SSDAVIS). . . . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . (ADLER). . . . . . . .BRO'WN. . . . . . , ✓ ILUXEMBOURGER).GRISET. . . . . .� NELSON). . . . . . .COOPER. . . . . . (CRANK). . . . . . . .HANSON. . . . . . .L�— KUZNIK). . . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . ._ (MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . . , ._L,�— LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET. . . . . ._yG (KUZNIK). . . . . . .HOLT. . . I . I . . ✓ ODLUM). , , . . . . .KAWANAMI . . . .�G MRTIO: LUM). . . . . . . .KAWANAMI . . . . JG CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY. . . . . . ._{� LL) . . . . . .MARSHOTT. . . .x BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . .J,,C . . . . . .MULLEN, . . . . . w (WIEDER). . . . . . . -FAN F614. . . . . (COOPER). . . . . . .+NELSON. , , . , , ✓ (HOLMBERG). . . . .WEDEL. . . . . . . ✓ (MAC ALLISTER), PATTINSON. . . QL-,0 (CATLIN). . . . . . .Wi!ffERS. . . . ._ CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY. . , . , , . ✓ HEATHER). . . . . .PLUMMER. . , , . ✓ OVERHOLT) . , . ,ROTH. . . . . , , . ✓ DISTRICT 3HOESTEREYS, . . .SALTARELLI. , ✓ BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . ✓ (OLSON). . . . . . . .FINLAYSON. , . ✓ WIEDER). . . . . . ..4+011 'ON. . . . ...✓ (PARTIN). . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . . . (SELVAGGI). . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . .. SADLER). . . . . . . .BROWN. . . . . . ._� (MANDIC). . . . . . .THOMAS. . . . . . _�� (PERRY). . . . . . . .CULVER. . . . . .--L,G (AGRAN). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. . .__LC (SEIDEL). . . . . . .FRESE. . . . . . . (GREEN/SMITH), .WAHNER. . . . . ._� (RISNER). . . . . . .GRGAS. . . . . . ,�_ (MURPHY). . . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . .�G (DAVIS). . . . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . , ,sG (HOLMBERG). . . . .WEDEL. . . . , . ._� SLUXEMBOURGER).GRISET. . . . . ._� (CATLIN). . . . . . .W-1N;FE-R-S. . . . ,_,C ((RELL). . . . . . . . .MARSHOTT. . . . JG (COOPER). . . . .. .NELSON. . . . . . _y_ (OVERHOLT). . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . ... W I E D E R). , . .. �rFA'IQ1`G'IY. . . , , ,/ SELVAGGI�. , , , :SYLVIA. . . . . .�_ MANDIC). . . . . . .THOMAS. . . . . . LG�SSHOLMBERG). . . . .WEDEL. . . . . . ., STAFF: ICATLIN). . . . . . .WiN;Er . . . . .. HARPER, . . . . . SYLVESTER. . . DISTRICT S CLARKE. @ . . . , DAWES. , , . . . . (MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . . . . ✓ ANDERSON. . . . (HEATHER). . . . . .PLUMMER. . . . . ✓ BUTLER. . . . . . (WIEDER). . . . . . . BROWN. . . . . . . BAKER. , . . . , , DISTRICT 6 KYLE. . , , . . , , YOUNG— , . s . (SMITH). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . . . . ✓ (MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . . . .� (WIEDER). . . . . . . T. . . ... ' OTHERS: WOODRUFF, . . , DISTRICT 7 HOHENER. . . . . ^�— HOWARD. . . . . , (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . ✓ HUNT. . , . . , , , (MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . . . . KEITH. . . . . . . (HOESTEREY). . . .EDGAR. . . . . . . KNOPF. . . . . . , (LUXEMBOURGER)..GR�yIS�ETp,�.�. . . . .�G LE BLANC. . . . (WIEDER). . . . . . .&+*NiF8N4 , . , . ✓ LINDSTROM. . , 4AGRAN). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. . , LYNCH. . , . , , ((GREEN). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . , . . MARTINSON, . . PEARCE, . . .. . DISTRICT 11 (MAC ALLISTER),BAILEY. . . . . . ✓ (MAC ALLISTER).PATTINSON. . .-OW (WIEDER). . . . . . .S+kMtlT . . . . 1/17/84 MEETIN: DATE March 14, 1984 -_MF 7:30 p.m. u W r ISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7 & 11 v D I$'= JOINT BOARDS S. 1 (CRANK). . . . . . . ...iANSON, . , . . _ =� (MAC ALLISTE3),?AILE''. (LJXcMBOURGER). iR[SET. , , % (.ADLER). . . . . , 3ROWN. . , , , . . (HOEST_REY). . . .SALTAREL-. . �- �NELSON) . . , ., , , ,,000P_3, 1 , . . , / P£RRY). . . . . . , .CUL`�ER . . . �. ...r DISTRICT (HOESTEREY) . . . .EDGAR. . . . . . . , (OLSON) , , , , , , . ,FINLAYSON, , , r (SEIDEL). . . . . . .FRESE. . . . . . .77- (MURPHY). . . . . . .'WEDAA. . . . , ; ._� (RISNER). . . . . . .GRGAS. . . . . . . / l0V_RHOLT), , , , ,ROTH. . . . . . (DAVIS). . . . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . . . (ADLER). . . . . . . .BROWN* . , . . , ,�- (LUXEMBOURGER).GRI SET. . . . . . / (NELSON). . . . . . .000PER. . (CRANK). . . . . . . .HANSON. , , , , ,_ 44KUZNIK). . . . . ,HOLT. , , , . . , ,� S,MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . . , , ILUXEMBOURGERS,GRISET, , . . , . KUZNIK). . . . . . .HOLT. . . . . , , ,�- �ODLUM). . . . . . . .KA'WANAMI, , . ,� �OOLUM), m # - & mssKAWANAMI , , . . / CULVER). . . . . . . PERRY. . . . . . . ELL). t , , , , , , ,.MARSHOTT, . , , / BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . , , , ,-7` PARTINI, , , , . , ,MULLEN. , , , , , (WIcDER), . . . . . . No (COOPER)(COOPER). . . . . , ,NELSON, , , . , , (-HOLMBERG). . . . .'WEDEL. . . . . . ?- MAC ALLISTER).PATTINSON, . . cz (CATLI,N). . . . . . 5-r. , . .�� 4CULVER). . . . I —PERRY. . , , , , , HEATHER). . . . . .PLUMMER, . , , .� �OVERHOLT), . . . ,ROTH, , , DISTRICT . , , , ,? RICT S HOESTEREY). . . .SALTARELLI, .�% (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . .-7' SOLSON), , . . 11 ' .FINLAYSON, / (WIEDER). . . . . , ,..S.LA.N��t., , , , , tPARTIN), . . .MULLEN. . . �EE SADLER), , . . . . . . BROWN, , . . . . .�� (MANDIC). . . . . . . CCPERRY). . . . . . . .CULVER. . . . . ..= THOMAS, , , , , , (SEIDEL). . . . . . .FRESE. . . . . , , - (AGRAN), , , , , , , ,VARDOULI . . , ,�-. (GREEN/SMITH)„WAHNER, , . . , . 44RISNER). . . . . . . GRGAS. . . . . . ..! SMURPHY). . . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . . IDAVIS), , , . , , , . GRIFFI,d, . . . ,-7� HOL,MBERG). . . . .WEDEL. . . . . . . (LUXEMBOURGER). GRISET. . . (CATLIN). , , , . , . . ,� (RELL). . . . . . . . .,MARSHOTT, . . ; COOPER). . , , , , .NELSON. . OVERHOLT) . . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . �� �WIEDER). . . . . . ..Fr ,n SELVAGGI ). . . . .SYLVIA. , . . . .� MANDIC). . . . . . .THOMAS. ; (HOLMBERG). . . . .'WEDEL. . . . , . _�/ STAFF: r.r (CATLIN). . . . . . . 5", . . . HARPER. , , , , . uISTRICT S SYLVESTER, , , CLARKE, , . , . ,✓ (.MAURER). . . . . . . HART. . . , . . OAWES. , . , . . ,�L ANDERSON. . . . SSHEATHER). . . . . . PLUMMER. . BUTLER. , , , , , IWIEDER). . . . . . .S f,'tv. . . . BROWN DISTRICT 5 BAKER. , , , , , , ✓7t KYLE. . ,= �— YOUNG, , . . . , ,- ��/ �SMITH). . . . . . . .'WAHNER. . . . . . ,MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . (WIEDER). . . . . . .4;A** N i OTHERS: DISTRICT 1 -- 'WOODRUFF, , , , HOHENER, , , , . / HOWARD, , . . . . (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . , , . HUNT, , . , , , , , (MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . , . . KEITH. , . , . , . 44HOEST=REY) . , . .EDGAR. . . , . . .—� KNOPF, . , , , , , (LUX=MBOURGER) ,f:RISET, . , . . ,—� LE BLANC. , . . (Wi:7ER). . . . . . .STANTON. . . . ._ � LINDSTROM. . , (AGRAN). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. . . � / LYNCH. , , . , , , (GREEN). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . . . . 7 MARTINSON, . . DISTRICT 11 PEARCE. . , , . , (MAC ALi.ISTER). BAILEY. . . . . . / VA �a4 44-14 �j .MAC ALLISTER).PATTINSON. . . 4�1 . - % .W I EDER). . , . . ...S'_..,. �. , . /— p,4 T,0,('C.'AWAr7F �n1�— /t7(9rtT 401V MARCH 14, 1984 JOINT MEETING NOTES f7 (a) - Report of the Joint Chairman Chairman Holt reported that last month Jim Anderson, the Executive Officer of .� the Regional Water Quality Control Board, appeared before the Board to advise that the Districts' 301(h) waiver hearing was delayed from February 10 to April 13, so that some differences between EPA and his agency could be ironed out with regard to the ocean monitoring. He then referred to a Memorandum dated March 9th in the Directors' folders which was issued by Mr. Anderson to the Regional Water Quality Control Board on the status of the 301(h) permit for the Districts. The new schedule listed on the back of the Memorandum proposes a joint EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board hearing on July 13th. He said that in a telephone conversation that day, Mr. Anderson indicated that this is a drawn-out schedule which could be shortened once he has received EPA's monitoring proposal. As of that day, EPA had not given the Regional Board the monitoring program that they wished the Districts to implement. The staff has not seen it either. Mr. Holt reported that Mr. Harper and he were meeting in San Francisco with the EPA Region IX Director of Water Programs the next day in an effort to move this process along. The Joint Chairman then advised that on March 30th the nationally-advertised RFP's for the reuse and disposal of our Districts' sludge are due. 108 individuals and firms have taken out the proposal specifications. He stated that the Select Committee to Advise Staff would meet and review proposals (They are Don Holt, Dick Edgar, Don Roth, Don Saltarelli, Don Smith and Bill Vardoulis) . Mr. Holt reported that he and the staff met with representatives of the city of Fountain Valley including Director Barbara Brown on March 6th to discuss the status of the Districts' ultimate solids management program, as well as the Districts' odor control study and future joint works proposed for wastewater treatment at our facility here in Fountain Valley. He also indicated that he had subsequently received a formal communication from Mayor Marvin Adler relative to the screen check Draft Supplemental EIS/EIR for Ultimate Sludge Disposal. A copy of this formal response will be forwarded to the consultant engaged by the Districts to prepare the Supplemental EIS/EIR for inclusion into the document. Chairman Holt then reported that on March 13th he made a presentation about the Sanitation Districts to approximately 600 members of the Orange County Realtors Investment Association in Anaheim. He thanked Ray Young for all his assistance in preparing the material. Mr. Holt annnounced that V. A. Heim is retiring this month after 37 years of service with the County. In his capacity as Auditor-Controller, he has also served the Sanitation Districts as ex-officio Auditor-Controller. He then offered a resolution for adoption by the Boards commending Vic Heim for his fine support and assistance over the years to our Districts and his outstanding public service to the people of Orange County. Resolution No. 84-41 unanimously adopted. Mr. Holt then indicated that he had met the previous day with FAH, JWS and Peer Swan and Art Bruington from IRWD to bring along negotiations with IRWD and let them know the door is open here. We just need their proposal. Asked staff to contact the members of the Select Advisory Committee (see names above) to try to set up a meeting at a mutually-agreeable time relative to IRWD. Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper reported that the previous week he had participated in a Conference of Coastal Agencies seminar in Washington re municipal sludge and the ocean - are they compatible? Key Senate and top staff aides were there. The Seminar was scheduled to coincide with hearings on Amendments to Ocean Dumping Act. One of the things that the House side is looking at is a sewer fee to use the ocean. They are looking at it as a punitive action. It does appear that the New Jersey Congress people on the House side are going to be successful in getting New York to move their sludge by barge from 12 miles to 106 miles out in the ocean. Has been a controversial issue since 1976. Is a political platform. Willard Bascom was also part of the presentation and did an excellent job. We are making some good progress on our research legislation. We are hopeful that in the next two weeks we will have something pretty definite from our own Congressman and Congressman Anderson in the Long Beach area. Mr. Harper indicated that the staff mailed under separate cover a report from the Industrial Waste Division detailing what we have been doing with local industries and industrial waste permit people relative to new requirements that will be placed on them this April. Staff has done an excellent job informing these people. Some of these industries will not be in compliance but will move them into compliance as quickly as possible. He then reported on the Supplemental Agenda items. Re item 16 (a) re extending the time that we have hired White, Fine and Verville who are providing assistance on the ocean research project. We aren' t asking for additional funding at this time, just that the time be extended. Said he will be making a report to the Joint Chairman and Executive Committee, probably in April, relative to where we stand and what the chances are for this legislation. Mr. Harper then stated that he received a letter from the firm of World Utilities, Inc. There has been other correspondence with them advising them that we are in the process of nationally advertising for proposals for reuse of our sludge on a long-term basis, and we urged them to get their proposal in. We did indicate that if they wish to purchase the sludge on an interim basis, we will sit down and talk to them about that. Hopefully, they will put in a proposal by March 30th. #7 (c) - Report of the General Counsel TLW referred to two Memos mailed to Directors. One where we sued a construction company who had seriously damaged a pipeline of the Districts in the Irvine area. They had consistently refused to pay the claim. Finally, we were ready to go to trial in April and last week they settled and paid our claim. The other Memo was with regard to a matter where we were a defendent on a claim relative to the Knott Interceptor in Buena Park. The contractor' s insurance company has settled the claim and we didn' t have to pay anything. He advised that there was another Memo in the Directors' folders which is the best news relative to a grant appeal in District 11, but it applies in some respects to all the Districts. The auditors came in after a construction job and reviewed certain items. The staff's opinion differed from that of the auditors on three items. Said we came to the Board a year or so ago and recommended we take it up on appeal. We were just advised by Region IX of EPA that they had reversed their position on all three. The Districts will receive $100,000. Said he would report later on Arrowhead Linen under the District 2 item. -2- Director Hanson then reported that as the Districts' representative to the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency, he had taken a helicopter tour of the Santa Ana River and possible flood areas. He gave a brief slide presentation on his trip. r #13 - Six-month financial report /i WHB reported that the Districts are well within the budget as of the six-month 51Kk report. We have experienced some major increases in a few areas for which we budgeted last year re increased personnel, power and gate fees for disposal of our sludge in the Coyote Canyon Landfill. Are within the budget on these three items and expect to stay within budget for the remainder of the year. M/S to receive and file. /.-416 (a) - White, Fine & Verville time extension Don Holt stated that working with Lee White has been a pleasure. He is an outstanding, efficient, effective and respected man in Washington. M/S to approve Change Order B to P. 0. #8970. #19(a) - DISTRICT 2 - Arrowhead Linen TLW briefly reported that this goes back about 8 months ago. The company had accrued delinquency invoices in the amount of $46,000. The staff was not able to obtain compliance from them. Came to the Board in an attempt to collect this. Made a / request to the Board in December to authorize a 12-month payment period for $40,000. Shortly after that they made a payment of $16,000 and the check bounced. In January they got it covered but first quarter fees became due. A Cease & Desist Order was issued by the General Manager. They came in and paid delinquency charges and the check bounced. Went back after them again. They have requested the staff to evaluate their loss of water and they say our readings are in error. We took their same data and came up within �% of what the District was estimating. They continue to disagree with our staff and refuse to sign the Industrial Waste Permit, so they really have no basis to discharge. They paid the permit fee but didn' t sign it yet. They were given until 3:00 p.m. that day to bring the signed permit in. He said now they have advised it will be in by tomorrow morning. The staff doesn't think this will work with them. Have heard they may be trying to sell the company also. We have given them notice that they must advise in writing re new owner. Said he felt anything short of tough enforcement will cause the District to lose this money. M/S to authorize GC to file necessary legal actions. -3- C n�wac �cscv.�so� c�1 . �O,a-�/d1 k7 prsr, Z. c �r -ca2>4 oc � Co���rr 17 S� 40�*T�k#W� hjPq: -- A P R44W 72) CCM, J Plt.IWi,)6 Acr- ..w t u- 6rT n1 Ye 70 !o f)K .f. �116:s, l7F- 7a J& vii r��T� — 4�}i�°o�E / r9 7b 1 W 1�L fo eo"r," i L two tArf1T 10Ll V,N,t- — �SrlaJ of T9 41 '- f�'��� L lr- T-:7 OCR T�- G�oQ-uO Vn unel ZNC. A)oJ75lcytrr T� CtM144101 u&,o TVtm 7v CoMP w cJ. PkPosAt- 7b Sam oa pa n 4*1s — Aga?o� Apo TZ 7-Pk-i IA) qAk-/ P44i) looVo of Ctkm rPL-( �fli3. — orr 1 6,e k (%o 2E:S7f- - do�i M6W 7*,J — -A rra-r'lpl-fM M.sThw-- ;Zell A Auwwlel 1 c «� �7c F / �osr �y COW— 1� <7 -CIA � p4l, "&� (b� I 00, Iq Ca) — f k-* Ml� - "A� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 31 51 G, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA !MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MARCH 14, 1984 (i ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on March 14, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. , in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the r-11 was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 &..d 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem Robert Luxembourger x Don Saltarelli Ronald Hoesterey Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry Wedaa, Chairman Todd Murphy x Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Barbara Brown Marvin P. Adler x Sam Cooper Carrey Nelson x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger x Donald Holt Robert Ruznik x Carol Rawanami William Odlum x Bob Perry Norman Culver x Don Smith Gene Beyer Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg Duane Winters x Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: x Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Richard Olson a Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tem Richard Partin x Barbara Brown x Marvin P. Adler x Norman Culver Bob Perry r..' x Henry Frese Norma Seidel x Victor Grgas Joyce Risner x Don Griffin Jesse Davis x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger x Frank Marshott Charles J. Rell x Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper x Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder x Charles Sylvia Anthony R. Selvaggi x John A. Thomas Robert P. Mandic, Jr. x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg Duane Winters x Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Philip Maurer x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Jacqueline Heather Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman Steven Smith x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Richard Edgar Ronald Hoesterey x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder x Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran �►' x James Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister a Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister Roger Stanton x Harriett Wieder -2- 3/14/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Tom Dawes, Bill Clarke, Blake Anderson, Rita Brown, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Bob v Ooten OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Darrel Cohoon * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt reported that at the Report of the Joint Chairman February 8, 1984 meeting of the Joint Boards, Mr. James Anderson, Executive Officer of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) , advised the Boards that the Districts' 301(h) waiver hearing had been delayed from February 10 to April 13, 1984 to enable the Regional Board and EPA to resolve differences between the two agencies relative to the Districts' proposed ocean monitoring program requirements. -3- 3/14/84 Chairman Holt then referred Directors to a March 9th memorandum issued by Mr. Anderson to the Regional Water Quality Control Board on the status of the Districts' 301(h) Waiver/NPDES permit now proposing the joint EPA/RWQCB hearing on July 13th. Mr. Anderson has indicated that this extended schedule could lqwpl possibly be shortened once he receives EPA's proposed monitoring program for the Districts. Chairman Holt advised that he and the General Manager were scheduled to meet with EPA officials in San Francisco on March 15 in an effort to move the process along. Mr. Holt reported that responses to the nationally advertised Request for Proposal for Offsite Reuse/Disposal of Districts' sludge were due on March 30. 108 firms and individuals requested proposal specifications. Chairman Holt stated that a Select Committee of Directors to Advise Staff, including himself, Vice Joint Chairman Edgar, Directors Don Roth, Don Smith and Don Saltarelli, would meet to review the proposals following a screening by Districts' staff. Joint Chairman Holt advised the Boards that he and staff recently met with representatives of the City of Fountain Valley, including Director Barbara Brown, to discuss the Districts' ultimate solids management program, the odor control study and future Joint Works facilities proposed for wastewater treatment at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. He also reported that he had subsequently received a formal communication from Fountain Valley Mayor Marvin Adler regarding the Screen Check Draft Supplemental EIS/EIR for Ultimate Solids Disposal, and reported that this formal response from the City would be forwarded to the Districts' environmental consultant for inclusion in the final Supplemental EIS/EIR document. The Joint Chairman then advised Directors that on March 13, he made a presentation about Sanitation Districts' operations to approximately 600 members of the Orange County Realtors Investment Association in Anaheim. Mr. Holt also reported that he and staff had recently met with representatives of the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) Board of Directors to continue discussions with IRWD relative to formation of proposed District No. 14. He reported that the Districts were awaiting IRWD's proposal, and once the proposal was received, he intended to convene the Select Committee to Advise Staff to review the IRWD proposal. Chairman Holt called upon Director Robert Hanson, the Districts' representative i to the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , who gave a slide presentation regarding existing facilities and proposed flood control improvements in the Santa Ana River Basin. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee at 5:30 p.m. , Wednesday, March 28, and invited Directors Saltarelli and Vardoulis to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Holt announced that V.A. Heim, Adopting Resolution Commending County Auditor--Controller, was retiring V.A. Heim, County of Orange in March after 37 years of service. In Auditor-Controller, for outstanding his capacity as County Auditor-Controller, public service Mr. Heim also served as ex-officio Auditor of the Districts. Mr. Holt then offered Resolution No. 84-41 commending V.A. Heim for his outstanding public service and 4..., support of the Districts. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: -4- 3/14/84 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-41, commending V.A. Heim- for his oustanding contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement as the Auditor-Controller of the County of Orange. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that he and Report of the General Manager Willard Bascom, Executive Director of SCCWRP, had participated in an AMSA Conference of Coastal Agencies seminar last week entitled Municipal Sludge and the Ocean - Are They Compatible? The seminar, attended by key Senate and House staff aides, was scheduled to coincide with House markup of the Ocean Dumping Act. He reviewed major elements of the legislation being reviewed by the House and advised that Congressmen Ron Packard from Orange County and Glenn Anderson from Long Beach were working hard to secure legislation to allow the Districts' proposed deep ocean sludge disposal research project: Mr. Harper indicated that Mr. Bascom made an excellent presentation regarding ocean research efforts off the Southern California coast. The General Manager also reported that the Industrial Waste Division had mailed each Director a report under separate cover outlining staff's activities undertaken to notify industries of the new EPA industrial waste discharge requirements they must meet after April 27, 1984. Mr. Harper advised that the Industrial Waste staff and inspectors were doing an excellent job keeping industrial waste permittees informed of the requirements. He further indicated that some firms would probably not be in compliance by the time the new requirements are in effect, but that the staff would be pressing to move them toward compliance in a relatively short time. Mr. Harper reported on a supplemental agenda item requesting an extension of the time period during which the law firm of White, Fine and Verville could.continue to assist the Districts in obtaining legislative approval for our proposed deep ocean sludge disposal research project. He indicated that there would be no additional cost to the Districts for the time extension for calendar year 1984. The General Manager stated that he had recently received a letter from the firm of Wagner Laboratories/World Utilities, Inc. , requesting to buy sludge from the Districts. Mr. Harper indicated that the staff had responded to earlier requests from the firm by providing them with a copy of the nationally-advertised Request for Proposal for Offsite Reuse/Disposal of the Districts' Sludge, and had urged the firm to submit a proposal by the March 30, 1984 deadline. The firm has also been advised that if they desire to buy the Districts' sludge on a short term basis, the Districts were prepared to discuss the terms and conditions of such an arrangement. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the Report of the General Counsel Districts' claim against Pacific Pipeline Co. for damaging a Districts' interceptor in the Irvine area in 1980 had finally been settled in the Districts' favor. A check for $17,014.51 in full payment of the claim has been received. Mr. Woodruff also reported that the Districts had recently received notification that litigation against District No. 3 regarding loss of business by a claimant during construction of the Knott Interceptor Sewer in Buena Park several years ago had been settled. The contractor's insurance company undertook defense of the Districts, and has settled the claim in all respects at no cost to the Districts. -5- 3/14/84 The General Counsel further reported that the Districts' grant appeal relative to construction of portions of Reaches 1 and 2 of the Coast Highway Interceptor had been resolved. He advised that the Districts will soon be receiving an agreement from the EPA ratifying the settlement along with a check in the sum of �.d $100,084.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 2 08 84 2 22 84 = ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $441,922.86 $240,013.88 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 302,876.95 94,811.65 Joint Working Capital Fund - 101,522.99 64,231.66 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 2,421.24 4,332.68 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- 15.83 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 16,775.18 2,438.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 1,228.54 13,696.12 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 65,841.88 4,727.51 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 20.66 15.83 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 2,485.84 8,385.23 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 653.74 86,715.19 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,455.31 978.46 �.✓ DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,027.08 --- $942,232.27 $520,362.45 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting revised General Provisions and Standard Specifications dated That the Boards of Directors hereby April, 1984 adopt revised General Provisions and Standard Specifications dated April, 1984, applicable to all Districts' construction jobs for plans and specifications issued after April 1, 1984. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Jobs Nos. I-2R-2 and I-2R-3 to Sancon Engineering, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-23, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, Job No. I-2R-2, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. I-2R-3, to Sancon Engineering, Inc., in the total amount of $842,496.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-097 to .� Advanco Constructors, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-24, to receive -6- 3/14/84 and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract to Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-097, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $106,600.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. _ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Job No. PW-112 approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-112, indicating that the base tile for the project would be furnished by the Districts for installation by the contractor. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-112 to Frank Ultimo, General Building That the Boards of Directors hereby Contractor adopt Resolution No. 84-25, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-112, to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the amount of $19,969.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-116 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-26, approving plans and specifications for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. 2 Computer System RPU's (Remote Processing Units) , Job No. PW-116, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-122 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-27, approving plans and specifications for Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. J-11R That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-28, approving plans and specifications for Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner, Job No. J-11R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. P2-25-2 specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, approving a deduction of $5,654.00 from the contract with Advanco -7- 3/14/84 Constructors, Inc., due to substitution of co-plastic slide gates with stainless steel frames for cast iron sluice gates originally specified, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. P2-27 specifications for Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, authorizing an addition of $50,242.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., for removal of undisclosed asphalt and utilities, changes in grading and in equipment required, additional pipe encasement and other miscellaneous modifications and additional work, and granting a time extension of 220 calendar days for said additional work, equipment delays and inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Job No. P2-27 specifications for Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, assessing liquidated damages for 21 days of unauthorized delay in completing the project at $500.00 per day, pursuant to the provisions of the contract for said work, and approving a deduction of $10,500.00 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. dud ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. P2-27 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-29, accepting Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-27, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 11705 to G.S. That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Rasmussen re Job No. PW 092 to issue Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 11705 to G.S. Rasmussen increasing the total amount by $3,500 from $11,000 to $14,500 for additional computer analysis requested by staff re further evaluation of alternate couplings required in connection with Modification of Engine Compressor Units in Blower Building, Job No. PW-092. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-110 specifications for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, authorizing miscellaneous modifications and additional work at no cost to the Districts and granting a time extension of 41 `.d calendar days to the contract with Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for said additional work, inclement weather and District-caused delays, be, and is hereby approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- 3/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-110 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-30, accepting Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job �✓ No. PW-110, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Gierlich-Mitchell That the Boards of Directors hereby for Purchase and Installation of authorize the staff to issue a purchase Budd Plastic Chain, Sprockets and order to Gierlich-Mitchell in an amount Appurtenances, Job No. PW-114 not to exceed $87,000 plus tax for Purchase and Installation of Budd Plastic Chain, Sprockets and Appurtenances, Job No. PW-114, to retrofit for trial on one secondary clarifier at Plant No. 2 to replace cast iron equipment that is failing due to corrosion. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing installation and evaluation of Full-scale Romax That the Boards of Directors hereby Process, Job No. PW-126 authorize installation and evaluation of Full-scale Romax Process, Job No. PW-126, to reduce sulphur content in digester gas scrubbing systems, to be installed under force account at Reclamation Plant No. 1 digester gas compressor facility at a total cost not to exceed $36,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing installation and evaluation of Pilot-scale Hiperion That the Boards of Directors hereby Process, Job No. PW-127 authorize installation and evaluation of Pilot-scale Hiperion Process, Job No. PW-127, to reduce sulphur content in digester gas scrubbing systems, to be installed under force account at the digester gas compressor facility at Plant No. 2 at a total cost not to exceed $25,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuing urgency Purchase Order That action of the staff in issuing No. 15378 to Philadelphia Gear urgency Purchase Order No. 15378 to Corporation re Specification Philadelphia Gear Corporation in the No. E-148 amount of $11,246.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of One (1) Replacement Gear Set for Gear Boxes on the Main Sewage Pumps at "C" Headworks, Specification No. E-148, to be used as a standby spare unit for said gear boxes, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to ISCO, Inc. , for That the Boards of Directors hereby purchase of Eight (8) ISCO authorize the staff to issue a purchase Sequential Samplers, order to ISCO, Inc. in an amount not to Specification No. E-149 exceed $13,040.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of Eight (8) ISCO Sequential Samplers, Model No. 1680, Specification No. E-149, to be used for increased industrial waste monitoring program. -9- 3/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Beckman That the Boards of Directors hereby Instruments for purchase of One (1) authorize the staff to issue a purchase Each Microtex Model 2055 Toxicity order to Beckman Instruments in an Analyzer, Microtex Reagent Starter amount not to exceed $11,815.00 plus tax Pack and Recorder, Specification and freight for purchase of One (1) Each No. E-150 Microtex Model 2055 Toxicity Analyzer, Microtex Reagent Starter Pack and Recorder, Specification No. E-150, to be used to improve and expand capabilities for industrial waste monitoring and effluent monitoring required in accordance with the Districts' NPDES Permit. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with R.P. Lindstrom certification re final negotiated fee and Associates re preparation of with R.P. Lindstrom and Associates for EIR on the updated Master Plan for preparation of Environmental Impact Joint Works Facilities Report on the updated Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with R.P. Lindstrom and Associates re That the Boards of Directors hereby preparation of EIR on the updated adopt Resolution No. 84-31, approving Master Plan for Joint Works agreement with R.P. Lindstrom and Facilities Associates for preparation of an dd Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities, on an hourly-rate and expense-reimbursement basis, for a total amount not to exceed $34,165.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on February 29, 1984, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting revised settlement procedures for liability claims and That the Boards of Directors hereby rescinding Resolution No. 78-107 adopt Resolution No. 84-32, adopting revised settlement procedures for liability claims and rescinding Resolution No. 78-107, as recommended by the General Counsel. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to award a purchase order contract to That the General Manager be, and is Falcon Services re Specification hereby, authorized to award a purchase No. 5-031 order contract to Falcon Services for Interim Out-of-County Trucking of Residual Solids, Specification No. 5-031, for an amount not to exceed $152,000 for a 90-day period commencing March 15, 1984. -10- 3/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Finance reported that Receive and file staff financial the Districts' expenditures for the report for six-month period ending first six months of fiscal year 1983-84 December 31, 1983 were well within budget. Mr. Butler r indicated that the Districts were experiencing some major increases in certain expenditures over previous years, but advised that the increases in power, landfill gate fees and personnel had been anticipated, and these expenditures would remain within budget for the year. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff financial report for six-month period ending December 31, 1983, be, and is hereby, ordered received and filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with County of Orange re the negotiated settlement That the Boards of Directors hereby for tax exchanges on properties adopt Resolution No. 84-33, approving annexing to the Districts agreement with the County of Orange relative to the negotiated settlement for tax exchanges on properties annexing to the Districts. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting a policy of allowing a District to amend a consolidated That the Boards of Directors hereby Master Plan of Trunk Sewers when adopt Resolution No. 84-34, adopting a such amendments are solely related policy of allowing a District to amend a To the facilities of that District consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers when such amendments are solely related to the facilities of that District, without requiring other Districts that are a / party to the consolidated Master Plan to also amend said plan. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 8970 to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized White, Fine & Verville re providing to issue Change Order B to Purchase assistance in obtaining legislation Order No. 8970 issued to White, Fine & For the research project for deep Verville to provide assistance in ocean disposal of sludge obtaining legislation for the research project for deep ocean disposal of sludge, extending the term of said services through calendar year 1984, at no increase in the total authorized compensation of $100,000.00. DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment That the Initial Study and Environmental re the Michelson Relief Subtrunk Impact Assessment relative to the and Force Main Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment That the Initial Study and Environmental lr% re the Campus Relief Subtrunk Impact Assessment relative to the Campus Relief Subtrunk, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -11- 3/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Comm- ittee to negotiate an amendment to That the Selection Committee, be, and is the agreement with Courton and hereby, authorized to negotiate an �..d Associates re preparation of an amendment to the agreement with Courton EIR on the Consolidated Master Plan and Associates for preparation of an for District 1, the Northern Half Environmental Impact Report on the of District 6, and District 7 re Consolidated Master Plan for District 1, mitigated negative declaration for the Northern Half of District 6, and added facilities District 7, providing for additional services to prepare Mitigated Negative Declarations relative to the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main and the Campus Relief Subtrunk. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny application for leave to present late claim of That the application for leave to Carolyn Malloy re damages caused present late claim of Carolyn Malloy by a sewer backup relative to alleged damages due to a sewer backup at the Versailles by the Lake apartment complex in Santa Ana, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, and; FURTHER MOVED: That said application for leave to present late claim be referred to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., March 14, 1984. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to execute Interim Sewer Service That the Boards of Directors hereby Agreements re providing temporary adopt Resolution No. 84-35, authorizing sewer service to property outside the General Manager to execute Interim Districts' boundaries that will be Sewer Service Agreements, in form served by District 2, District 7 approved by the General Counsel, with or proposed District No. 13 property owners/developers relative to providing temporary sewer service to property outside Districts' boundaries that will be served by District 2, District 7 or proposed District No. 13, in accordance with the guidelines previously established by the Boards and the negotiated AB 8 tax exchange settlement with the County of Orange for annexing properties. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 The General Counsel reported that Authorizing the General Counsel to Arrowhead Linen had recently refused to file necessary legal actions to sign an industrial waste discharge order Arrowhead Linen, Industrial permit, and had also breached the Waste Permittee No. 2-195, to cease agreement approved by the Board in and- desist from further discharge December, 1983 allowing the company to to the District's sewerage system make installment payments for �; outstanding. invoices.. The General - Counsel recommended. immediate legal action to cause the company to sign their permit and: note their outstanding: installment. payments.- It was then moved, seconded and duly carriedr r r -i -..r;Y �, t:r i`ri7t tj/t�,,,�t,•c `t i�-; -'tr"} s�T�t' ��o� �r ?.h+ �, � ` r <�, r .. 3/14/84 That the General Counsel be, and is hereby authorized, to file necessary legal actions to order Arrowhead Linen, Industrial Waste Permittee No. 2-195, to cease and desist from further discharge to the District's sewerage system for violation of the District's ordinance re discharging without a permit and for breaching the Agreement for Deferred Payment of Delinquent Invoices. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:09 p.m. , March 14, 1984. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-24-1 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-36-3, approving plans and specifications for Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:09 p.m., March 14, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee lJ negotiated fee in connection with certification re final negotiated fee in Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with connection with Addendum No. 1 to Boyle Engineering Corporation re Agreement with Boyle Engineering Contract No. 7-8 Corporation for design of the Von Karman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for additional services relative to the realignment of said sewer, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to Agree- ment with Boyle Engineering That the Board of Directors hereby Corporation re Contract No. 7-8 adopts Resolution No. 84-37-7, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Karman Alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for additional services relative to the realignment of said sewer and dual-track design previously approved by the Board, and increasing the total compensation, on an hourly-rate and expense-reimbursement basis, from $122,043.00 to an amount not to exceed $179,230.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee, be, and is Corporation re design of Contract hereby, authorized to negotiate with No. 7-2C-4 Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-4. -13- 3/14/84 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried::-'. .. Approving Agreement with the City of Newport Beach re Collection of That the Board of Directors hereby Sewer Connection Charges adopts Resolution No. 84-38-7, approving +■d Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 108 - Mahoney Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-39-7, ordering annexation of 3.91 acres of territory to the District located at the intersection of Vista del Lago and La Cuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 108 - Mahoney Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:09 p.m. , March 14, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement for Use of Sewerage Facilities with the State That the Board of Directors hereby of California, Department of Parks adopts Resolution No. 84-40-11, and Recreation, re connection and approving Agreement for Use of Sewerage service for Huntington State Beach, Facilities with the State of California, Phase II improvements Department of Parks and Recreation, relative to connection and service for Huntington State Beach, Phase II improvements, for a service fee of $625,000.00 plus annual operating and maintenance costs. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , March 14, 1984. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file comments on Notice mailed re preparation of EIR on the That the comments on Notice mailed re Master Plan Report for District preparation of EIR on the Master Plan No. 5 and the Southern Half of Report for District No. 5 and the District No. 6 Southern Half of District No. 6, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Draft Environ- mental Impact Report on the Master That the Draft Environmental Impact Plan Report for District No. 5 and Report on the Master Plan Report for the Southern Half of District No. 6 District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -14- 3/14/84 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report summarizing the Draft EIR on the That the Staff Report dated March 1, Master Plan Report for District 1984, summarizing the Draft EIR on the No. 5 and the Southern Half of Master Plan Report for District No. 5 District No. 6 and the Southern Half of District No. 6, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of the That the General Manager, be, and is Draft Environmental Impact Report hereby, authorized to file a Notice of for the Master Plan Report for Completion of the Draft Environmental District No. 5 and the Southern Impact Report on the Master Plan Report Half of District No. 6 for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 . Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing May 4, 1984, as the final date for comments to be That May 4, 1984, be, and is hereby, received on the Draft Environmental established as the final date for which Impact Report for District No. 5 all comments must be received on the and the Southern Half of District Draft Environmental Impact Report on the No. 6 Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fixing April 11, 1984, for public hearing on the Draft Environmental That April ll,. 1984, at 7:30 p.m. , in l�l Impact Report re Master Plan Report the Districts' Administrative Office, be for District No. 5 and the Southern the approved date, time and place for Half of District No. 6 public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) specifications for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , authorizing an addition of $4,191.28 to the contract with Russco Construction, Inc. for relocation of Edison power ducts feeding the Bay Bridge Pump Station which interfere with the District's facilities and City of Newport Beach highway improvements, and granting a time extension of 28 calendar days for completion of the additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , March 14, 1984. -15- 3/14/84 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then *Moll declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , March 14, 1984. /v Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 \..✓ -16- FUND NC 9159 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03184 PAGE 1 ---REPORT 3 (, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION , 067556 ALK OIL CO. S1*D43.53 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ! - - `i 667557 ACTION INSTRUMENTS* INC. $267*06 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067558 ADVANCEC-CRRICE-SERV-ICES---- ----- -------- -$64-9.50-------------OFF-ICE MACHINES---- ---------- " 0E7559 AOVANCC CCNSTRUCTORS* INC. $90*985.54 CONTRACTOR P2-27 067560 AMERICAN AIR FILTER* INC. $19423.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C67561-- -- AdERICAN CIIdPR€SSOR CO -- -s32-7-.-56 COMPRESSOR--RRRT-S " 067562 AMERON* INC. $795936 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT - 067563 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $29251*57 PIPE SUPPLIES C67564 --------AQUA-.BEN-CORE---------------------------•i22*699.52-------CHEMI CAL--COAGULANTS _._.------.------.----.-..___.. 067565 ARROW-RISCO* INC. $24.46 TRUCK PARTS C67566 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS $19270.25 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ' _. G67567---__-----•-ASSOC-IA-T-ED--CONCRETE---P-ROD*-*-1-iC---- - `-1.84-7.-76- BU-t4D-LNG-MA.TERIA4S --------" ` 067568 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES $165*00 LAB ANALYSIS 067569 ATLAS RADIATOR SERVICE 5852.35 TRUCK REPAIRS --i62.-0i- RETIREMENT-PLACQUES--- ----- ----------- __..-__ _. - _ 967571 CAKER PLY600D CO., INC. S1*098.21 SMALL HARDWARE p 067572 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $29809.89 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/CONTROL EQUIPMENT E M P-LA YE E-M-L L E A G E---- " D �67d73-- -PAUL•-Er€RGERON - - i30, --- 067574 BERTECH $189.15 TOOLS I„ • I--� G67575 BEVCO $370.44 ELECTRIC CART PARTS n 067576 ----------- BL-AKE*--NOFFITT 8- TOWNE-•-------------- ---- $589.25---------OFF-ICE...SUPPL-IES ---- - ----._.. -- - - - K 067577 BOMAR MAGNETO SERVICE* INC. S29307.61 ENGINE PARTS 067578 BROOKS INSTRUMENTS $37.10 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C67579--___ ------G-6-R-R€GGhpl-110NING-68. - -SfB5.00- RUMP-RERA-I-RS ------- --------- ------ 667580 CPT CALIFCRNIA* INC. $80.80 WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE 067581 CS COMPANY $859.35 VALVES 067582 - - ----CALIFORNIA- INSTITUTE-OF-TECHNOLOGY ---- S2*204.86--------DEEP-_OCEAN.-SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY --------•- - ;; C67583 CARMENITA FORD TRUCK SALES. IN $709.00 TRUCK PARTS 667584 JOHN CAROLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN $2*877.64 TRAINING AND START-UP P2-23-6 " 367505 - ----ART.-CARR.-TRANSMISSI-ON- --- ---i412.-R8 -TRUCK-REPAI-RS - ---------- -----,;; 067586 JOHN CASON 5751.6E ENGINE PARTS 067587 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES* INC. $1*968.42 FERRIC CHLORIDE TANK RENTAL 19675A8 ... CHEVRON-U.S.A.*--1NC.. ..- ..---- --------- _- --i7*081.11-- -- ---ENGINE-OIL--- - - - --- - -- -_. _.... ._. C675E9 CLARK DYE HARDWARE $27.98 SMALL HARDWARE 6675SO CONGRESS1CNAL STAFF DIRECTORY $82.50 PUBLICATIONS 067591 -- GONNEL-L-GHE-VROLE-T -- 00.-8-7 --TRUCK--PARTS -------------------•-- ; 667592 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $19808.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES : 067593 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES i3*219.20 ENGINE PARTS C67594- ---...-.. _._. ._ COUNTY- WILE- AMG-- -- __._.. _ ...._._.-_ _._..._._-------__.__. __$229,64 - ---- _.__ TRUCK PARTS _ _.. . .I 667595 CHARLES P. CROWLEY CO. $343.50 PUMP PARTS f.67556 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $120.30 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ' . . 067557 --_- _. -- DAILY-F4L-CT _._-.---- ------ _ _ .__.-....-__..__._._.___ -_..-_----537.-75-------- •---LEGAL.-ADVERTISING ------ `< 067598 DEK IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS $45.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 067599 DATA TECH $67.27 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 'i. a 067600 --_...--------PGTER- C.-CAY1D 60.---._------- -----•------------ --i24.300.00---.. . -_ CONTRACTOR-PW-102. 9 •,I II !1 !4 l FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 PAGE 2 ---- - - --RE-POR-T--NUMBER--AP4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION s 06760T-------DECKER-IN5rTRUMEN•T-•-SUPPtY-EB Si25-r90 -CONTROL EQUIPMENT --- R 067602 DECO $504.53 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067603 DELAFIELD CORP. $242.02 NOSE " I 067604 - DEVEON-EORPr- -- ---- ----- -S213r28- - ------ - PAINT -SUPPLIES -- I"� 0676C5 DICKSONS S101.76 ICE MAKER " 067666 DIGIDYNE COMPUTER SERVICES S968.90 MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE " "--- 067667 --------DOGUMEN4$--&-PUBL-i-GA-T-IONS - --$295•098---PUBLICATIONS - - ----- --- ---- „ 0676C8 DRIVER TESTING CENTER $84.00 DRIVER EXAMS 067609 DUMAS DIESEL INJECTION $318.64 ENGINE PARTS ` 067610---------EAS•TMANs-INCv-- - -- ------SIv400a35-------- OFFICE- SUPPLIES - __.___.--•----.__ ._- - .. "j iI 067611 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO- $52.56 SCROLL BALANCING, CENTRIFUGES ! C67612 ELLSWORTH TRUCK & AUTO $68.00 TRUCK PARTS - 067613 --- --ENGHAN-TERr-I-NG 500s00 OCEAN-MONi-TORI-NQ 067614 FAMILIAN PIPE & SUPPLY $781.64 PIPE SUPPLIES 067615 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $24#00 FREIGHT 067616-- ---- -- FILTER---SUPPLY-COs--- - -S-1-v291:07--- ENGINE-PARTS--- `- -----_._. ._. I,,I 067617 FIRST METALS• INC- $161.70 TOOLS h 067610 FISCHER & PORTER CO. $109119.11 PIPE SUPPLIES " y - 067619-- --FISHER-SC-F NTIF+C- E9 -395. -AB-SUPPN-E3 - - --- „ 1 067620 FIVE STAR FISH FARMS $60.00 LAB SPECIMENS „ IV 067621 FLAT & VERTICAL CONCRETE $372.00 CORE DRILLING " ! -- 067622 ----- -FOOT HIL-L GARDEN-EQUIPMENT 067623 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT $160.00 SURVEY P2-27 !M 66762A FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $888.19 FILM PROCESSING " P67625 - ----DON A-L-D-L-r­FE) -B-ASSOC-I-A-T E-17v8-75rO0 ---S-AFETY-EON5ULTtNO- 067626 THE FOXBORO COMPANY S153.13 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I 067627 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $993.11 COMPRESSOR PARTS " �,.. „ . flE762P., _- -----fREDSON---•-------- -- -_-584:76"-- -TOOLS--------- ---•------_.____..__._.-----__ ___ _.._. - __.___.. Ll67E.29 CITY OF FULLERTON $14.00 WATER USEAGE 667630 GW MAINTENANCE• INC. $318.52 PUMP REPAIRS 1 - 067631 ---------GARR-AT T-EALL-AHAN -COMPANY 50@s84- CONDUCTtV-1 Y-METER ------- - ---- 067632 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S468.33 TELEPHONE 067633 H&M DIESEL MACHINE S670.71 TRUCK REPAIRS , flE7634 -- -- ---- --HA&K-COMPANY------- - ---- --------- - 5274.07------- LAB-SUPPLIES , , 067635 HALSTED & HOGGAN• INC. .$132.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES >' i 067636 CHARLES G. HARDY. INC. $312.95 BUILDING MATERIALS - G67637- - - --HARTGE•-ENGINEERING-AND---GUNS-T-RUC-T+ON--GO,-------i2 2 1 3 1 2-0 5 0---ENGR--1-2R1;-hYRY,--PW-09 ------ s, ! 067638 E.G. HELLER'S SONS INC: $171.48 TOOLS u 067639 HILTI. INC. S19.66 TRUCK PARTS : 067640 _ -HOLCHEM.-INC.-- - ___.___ ...._..•.-----_. .___._...---_..------..- .-54�045►75 -_...._-_ _..CAUSTIC -SODA --- --------.._.- -.__..._.__ __..- � � C-67641 HONEYWELL• INC. $202.99 STRIP CHARTS v I„I 067642 HONEYWELL. INC. $238.81 THERMOSTAT � I 067643 -- - -- --hOOSIER-PLASTIC FABRICAT-ION---- ------------$591i90----SMALL HARDWARE-- -----"- --------- .,,� 067644 HORIZON HIGH-REACH S10 57.17 LIFT EQUIPMENT K I 067645 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC- $82.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES a --06764E - --- --NUNTINGTON LIE ACH-RUBBER-S-TAHP-- --- ------5103:46-------OFFICE-SUPPLIES- -__._..__-__-.._-__-.___.____.____._______._ r' „ FUND NC 9199 - JT GIST WCRKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 PAGE 3 -------- "--PO R•T-NUMB-1-"F4 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION '" -- ---•--667647 ---HUNT4NGT-QN-SUPPf=Y -$174.i t SMAtL-HARDWARE-- 067648 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN CYCLERY $38.03 BICYCLE PARTS D67649 HYDROTECHNICS PUMP 8 SERVICE S49736.13 PUMP PARTS " 067650 ------------ISCO--GOMPANY------------- -------- -------31 896.68---- - -FLOW-MONITORING LEASE- - ---- - - - 067651 IT CORPS $139360.00 WASTE HAULING/DISPOSAL SERVICES " 567652 ITT GRINNEL CO. S606.73 PIPE SUPPLIES " - --66-7653----------INDUS-TRIAL--4HREAOED-PR-ODUGIS .35 3MAEE-HARDWARE- - 067654 INGRAM PAPER S252.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 067655 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $44.86 TRUCK PARTS 067E56 ---.-..------INSTRUPENTAT-ION 1-ABORAT-OR-Y-*4NG--- -----5431.27--- --LAB-SUPPLIES - -- - -- - ----- --- __. ° 067E57 INMAC $107.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES „ C67658 INTEROY AMERICA $19100.00 TANK RENTAL 067659---------19VI-NE-4NCU9-TRI-AL-L-ANOSGAF€ -'29-56"00- PLAN-T-MA4NTENANGE -- s C67660 KAMAN BEARINGS B SUPPLY $816.32 BEARING SUPPLIES 067661 KELCO SALES S ENGINEERING CO. $43.44 RUBBER PRODUCTS ' 067662- ----- KIEWIT--PACIFIC-CO.--- -- -- -- ----si6.650.00 --------CONTRACTOR ---------- 067E63 KING BEARING• INC. S49335.03 BEARING SUPPLIES ., i676E4 L.B.W.S.. INC. 5825.84 WELDING SUPPLIES " 3> 067665-- -----.-LA-COL3-NA-9-F-€LLER-DE-V---6O- - - - -4650�00- SEWER-GONNE&T FON--FEE-REFUND ------ 1 067666 LAURSEN COLOR LAB $15.16 FILM PROCESSING Q4 067667 LIZ LEARN $113.56 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 067668 - ----- L-€€-8-R-0-CONSULTING-EN6R.---_- _-.----f11.7i6.00__..-_.._ENGR.--P?-SR-? ----- -------.-_._-----.-- ----- -_ .. . -- 6 0E7E69 LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORS• INC. $29642.95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES N 067670 K.P. LINDSTROM E ASSOCIATES $19705.87 ENGR. OCEAN WAIVER RESPONSE �• 067671 •---- ----LouRY I~-ASSOCIATES °M�6d�50 ENGR. 2--24T-2-25;2-2-3 ----- 067672 MACK TRUCKSo INC. $380.36 TRUCK PARTS ! C67E.73 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $76.28 PAGER SUPPLIES " 067674 I{CKESSCN -CHEMICAL- C-O.- - S4e-100.02 -CAUSTIC--SODA-- ------------- - -„ (167675 MCMASTER-CARR SUPFLY CO. $694.62 SMALL HARDWARE G 067676 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $6.00 WATER USEAGE " 067677 -- - ----- ----GEORGE-&--B-.-MORGAN-CO.-•-14C. $2-7r22-5.00- t ONTRAGTOR-PW--106 ------- 067E78 MOTOROLA• INC. $93.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067E79 MUNCIE FOWER PRODUCTS $592.99 SMALL HARDWARE 067680 ___ __ _-- NATEL -8--G0.--- - - --•------------_------------------.------S1e875.00 --- -TELEPHONE--SYSTEM -STUDY- 067681 NATIONAL CASH REGISTER $1,032.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 067E1-2 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. $39920.67 FILTER PRESS BELTS ;6 067683 NATIONAL-SANITARY--SUPF-L-Y ------- ---443-.70 JANITOR-1-AL--SUPPL-fES --- - 067684 THE OHI'ART CORP $209.06 METER 067665 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $309841.18 CHLORINE . G67686 _- _._. -. ORANGE -COUNTY--AUTO- PARTS--CO.--- - - ---- - -------•--- --596.81 ----- ---TRUCK PARTS--- - - n OE76P7 ORANGE COUNTY BLUEPRINT $29.68 BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES 06761;A ORANGE VALVL & FITTING CO. $29016.18 VALVES " 067669--- -.... . .- .. COUNTY_CF_--ORANGE--------------- ---- $2*228.-09-------PRE-EMPLOYMENT-EXAMS- ----- 067690 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR $479880.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES 067691 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $2,244.00 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND " j - C67692 - ----_..-_.... .PPG.-_INDUS.TPIES•- INC. - ----------- .-... -_.._ -- _.5390.a6-----------._--PAINT- SUPPLIES I ,e n „ FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 PAGE 4 ------- ----- --RE4-OR-T-NUMBER-AP43 _-- _- (' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ; CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION , I`=.------ 06-7693----PA&IFIG-SAF-E•T-Y-E-GUIPMENT G0_ ES- - 067694 PACIFIC BELL 3139.40 TELEMETERING o 067695 PARKING FACILITIES EQUIP. CORP $116.72 GATE REPAIRS, PLANT 02 " .. 067696 ---- --PARKSONr-TfiG.-- -- -- ---- -E4r594.04- -----ENGINE--PARTS- -- - - - -- - ---._ 067697 PASCAL & LUDWIC 1909000.00 CONTRACTOR P2-26 ; 067698 PEP BOYS $126.02 TRUCK TIRES "�- 067699--------- -PERMA-CAI-C-ORPORAT-TON-- --- --6975.4.7 ELECTR.I-GAL--SUPRLI-ES --------•- i' 067700 PERRY EGUIPMENT CORP. $220.52 ENGINE PARTS 0677C1 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS 41r135.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 967702-- ------- RAF-FER-T-Y-INTERNAT-TONAL---TRUCKS ------f498.84--- -TRUCK-KARTS-- ---•-------------------------- ---- - ( 067703 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. OF CALIF. , INC. $19387.57 PIPE SUPPLIES ; 067704 RERNORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS $19630.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES " - 067765--- - --R0ACHWA-TER-TECHN0L-0G-Ys-MG. 34964+.36- BOILER EQUIPMENT,PL-ANT-#2 - ---- --- --�� Ld 067706 ROBBINS & MEYERS $31.63 FREIGHT ! 067707 THEODORE ROBINS FORD $35.22 TRUCK PARTS I' ! 067708 - ---- --RUSSC0-CONS TRUCTION,--I NE--- ---- ----S6-3 09.-49 --CONTRACTOR--§ 18R - ---- - - - +'� G67709 JOSEPH T. RYERSON & SONr INC. $19077.09 STEEL STOCK 667710 , S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. f6 000.00 GEAR BOX REPAIRS ]>- 0 6 7 7 1 1----------SANGGN-ING - - ---Sir800.90 ZEBRON--COAT-1NG, TR11C-K-8E0-LIN-ING--------------- 067712 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS f49.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES , 067713 SANTA ANA DATSUN $91.35 TRUCK PARTS • 367714_ .--- ----SANT-A-ANA-DODGE---- - ----- f107.-3 UCK-PARTS----_..-.-_ 067715 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $181.13 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS 66771E SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. $439.38 LAB SUPPLIES L•67717 --------- SCHOLL-&-LOB-ADVEBTdS-I-NG 413-7.65 L'L-T-(MATE-SOLI-0S-DISPOSAL- PUBLAC-RART-1C-1 PAT 10N------!"' 067718 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $95.20 WATER USEAGE 067719 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $59993009 TOOLS/SMALL HARDWARE " "_- 067720--------- SHIMAD2Lr-SCIENTIF-I"NS-TR.. ------- - -S59165a00- -LA&-SUPPLIES------- ------- -- ----- " 3677e1 SOUTH CCAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $491.31 OFFICE FURNITURE ,F 067722 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO• $2379298.85 POWER G67]23... .- - --- - S0.-CALIF. SOIL---&-TZSTTNG ---0820.00----TEST-FNG-P-2-27- --- --------------- 067724 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $8.49 WATER USEAGE u l 067725 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $11#949,58 DIESEL FUEL 067726 - _ SPIRAL--BIDDING CO.r- INC.---. - ---- ------- $475.39 _ ------OFFICE--SUPPLIES-------------------._._. � I P67727 SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO. f1.746.74 SMALL HARDWARE 067728 STAINLESS PIPE & FITTING CO. $164.01 PIPE SUPPLIES 667729 -- -- THE--SUPPL-IERS------ - --------419321-,88 -SAFETY-SIGNS 067730 SWEETLAND CO. $131.85 TUBING C67731 TAYLOR BUS SERVICE f220.00 BUS RENTAL - SLUDGE DISPOSAL RFP CONFERENCE 'i 067732 --- -- - TEKTRONIX9-INC.- ----- ----- -- - - -- - f691.72-- - ---ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES P67733 TENNANT CO. 5122.67 ENGINE PARTS { t'67734 THOMPSOA LACQUER CO. $39425.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 067735 - - TRAFFIC-CGNTROL--SERVICES--ING.--- ; I 067736 TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL f5r512.50 ENGINE PARTS { 067737 TREESWEET PRODUCTS $18*204.46 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT l_ ... -0E77311 -- TRUCK-&-AU10- 1UP PLY v-ING. -- -- - ---- - --- - $29295.51- -------TRUCK -PA RTS-. ._._..-- - ----- - - --- - -- .I ,o n ►I%{ do FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/84 PAGE 5 - --- - ---_ RE-FORT- NUMBER—AP43 -- -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 ' WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 i ' J -. -- --067739 ---TUBESALES— 3384.66 PIPE SUPPL+ES— ------ ; 067740 UNDERWOOD SERVICES ASSOC: $19040.85 DICTATION EQUIPMENT 067741 UNILOC $240o29 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES + ';._. .. -. . n67742-. ___.......---UNITED--PARCEL -SF-RV-ICE----- -------SI09.38------- DELIVERY SERVICE-- ------- -----------_.__ . _ _ " "i 067743 UNITED STATES FOUIPMENT CO.r INC. $223.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS ,. 067741 UNIVERSITY SALES 9 SERVICE $48.34 TRUCK PARTS -06 7 745-----------iJ.S.-RASTTAL-SERVICE ---- - $40-96- "SE-CHARGE-OVERBAXMEHT " {"+ 067746 VWR SCIENTIFIC $423.63 LAB SUPPLIES e "L 067747 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO.,j S29428.65 PIPE SUPPLIES 067748---------- --VALVE-8-S1€€L-8UPPL-Y-GO-.-- -- ------5667.3E -VALVES----.._---- ----------------- b n67749 VARECr INC. $525.60 LAB REPAIRS "! C67750 C. K. VARNER CO.r INC. 5117.53 BUILDING MATERIALS " 0E7-751------VEH-ICLE-SRR-I-NG-SERV-i-CE— - --$51-2.-1.0- TRUCK__REPAIRS -------- " j' 067752 WAGNER. HYCRAULIC EOUIPMENT CO. E30.23 - PIPE SUPPLIES 067753 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $177.24 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR �' 0 6 7 7 0 4--------------- WAUK€SHA-€NGINE---SETT-VICENTER 449385.16-----ENGINE-.P-ARTS-------------______----•-.--_. ._ __.--- . f G67755 WESTERN TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES $29977.00 SCRUBBER REPAIRS „ 067756 WEYERHAEUSER CO. $5r253.84 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT + D 067757---- ---- -------GE0RG6--YARDLEY-A68OG-I-A-T[S- 52-.62 VAW-ES ----- ______- ------ -------TOTAL-C-LA-IMS--PA-ID-D2,08/84- 99429232,27--- - ------- - --- - -- — - i� SUMMARY - AMOUNT --- --- ---- ;; 12 OPER FUND $ 142.68 " #2 ACO FUND------- -- ------------ - ------- --232.50 --- -- ------- ------ - -- - - ., #2 F/R FUND 16,400.00 #3 OPER FUND 280.20 " §3 A C O FUND ---- — ---- ---5}4 8.34 ----- � ' #5 OPER FUND 2,432.39 d5 ACO FUND 63,409.49 " + #6 OPER FUND -------- - - ----- -------..._ _ - - ---- - --20.66------ #7 OPER FUND 881.50 + Y7 ACO FUND 948.34 N 7 F/R FUND - - -- ----- -- ------ - 6 5 0.0 0 - -- -- ---- „ #11 OPER FUND 653.74 :,..� #566 OPER FUND 3,455.31 " 8667 OPER FUND- - . ._ . _ -- - --- -- - . . 3,027.08 ,y JT OPER FUND 441 ,922.86 , I CORF 302,876.95 ' SELF FUNDED LIABILITY- CLAIMS FUND-- ----- — --- ---- F77..24- ------ _..----- --- ----- --- - - ------_-.. - --- !,� SELF ,FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2,244.00 u JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 101 ,522.99 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/08/84 $9421232.27 ®I`; At FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/84 PAGE I A r p Rt•: I'MBEV' 3.` s - 1°E.:-,.f` t :;,t'VCOUNT) % ANITAtION .DISTRIC[S OF ORANGE"COUNTY, ;tt:7�3`' IHS` I'1i,1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 067781 ABC" PPPINT':SYRIpIMG :SERyIC , -'z :'. , :.�At5,00 ' Y i 0671B2 ADVANCED !0FICL §ER ICE t N Ti2y0 62 � r,'M •°� OFFICE 0677b3 AERCO CDM R SS RS NCi` k i' {,+ COH RSUR PAaT"�is` J�,-'.k� :1E.7784 AIR CALIFORNIA $89.00 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS 0677e5 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALSs INC. $97.97 BUILDING MATERIALS n o ' 067786 AIR PRODUCTS d CHEMICALS.INC. $14436.88 SPECIALTY GASES ,. C67787 ALL A E N LEAS bF,, �ml ,Y i638i3f�,� E s 067708 ALI:rSTATE-.VEHXCL S� IN Rl �Y� i'1'���. ViEHICLS LEASES 11�`+I�•E 7 ;j _';' nja:y '?�i '� 067789 ALLIED SUPF� CO i E SU�PL I�S;:y:�� t .> Ld;• � n 067790 ALUMINUM PRECISION S1.497.98 USE CHARGE OVERPA ENT +' ++ 067791 AMERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. $20.13 FREIGHT +, 667792 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $555.39 ENGINE PARTS n 067 93 F.-.. t. ;A GE A ENT 'S R E..,�$.-o-,ti' m i.h `.�1<('" F. st12 �(y •z ''rJ,3r � -?'. 0LL7799 1, y �'A9UA'pp��•N GoppPr ` '� s7 13p3:4Q :l:i:rF. HENICAV /X aF Ml+ 1` by if+,, ..I1, YY f 'J,,067795 '.fr°+ a'_. .. 0 C. I};,�^ ,..7i4,:,: , 1 '' „ 067796 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC. $19120.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES n ++ 067797 ATLAS RADIATOR SERVICE $350.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 70 OF7798 AURORA DESIG14S ! $246.27 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT y� n 667799 RANDOI.PH AU TI ' CDs. ' cJ1 .r4i'= , ,y ',9k0{` Y'+Y 067800 BANK 'bF ANERICA NT -SiAta t�/{����,t, s�,�, ,. 'tk ? #' S1�tt4 � 1 ` y '�t1AVL '6ply� Yd"' `! 'q � i. 7 'Rt�,r4. sr15 ' "� ! ; a Y hi' ¢ M 4 - ty bat k n a F-� 067801 BEACON'BAY .ENTER091"JES'�, .IHC" :. � � �_ �c#. - ,,�. .�168�-00,��4''�l:,� ;•VE�CLE:'FIAI�IfiENAN��_ :tea_. �' yam;.: -:�; 'iYw,f,,•-s,� "� n ! t• OF7802 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $66.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �+ 1 C67PC3 RERTECH $393.04 TOOLS n t.. 067804 IsIG BOX RENTAL CO. _ $665.00 TRASH DISPOSAL + 067805 BOB S AIR CONDIT.O ING 1119.00 '7TFT.TAUCK REPAW ., f " 067806 CPT cgLIFCRNIA, INC. ±;Wokb:.p♦ZOCE4SING HAlNtEHANCE " 067807 C.W.P.C.A. $15 a00 • �.'LEGAL'`AoVERT)S,��Ib ✓:' 44 ++ 0678OF. CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH♦ INC. $130.82 LAB SUPPLIES '+ C67809 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SAH. AGENCIES $250.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION ,o 067810 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $319742.61 ENGR. P2-25-2 P1-20 J-1$ ENERGY TASK FORCE u 06781 HR S''CERV LLO Er. a ,, i ,` x' t+1:c 03� 0 �+ <r:►,5.! ,E G c.rP - ► i ' 7VUCCpART6 L,.�"C . , j tomt �067812 AST' PLNE-COS { VF ( 067813 A IRO '• 067814 COAST SCALE CO. S172.64 LAB SUPPLIES ' ¢67815 CONNELL CHEVROLET $178.10 TRUCK PARTS � s, C67PI5 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. S3.093.10 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES „ ` N6 IDATED REODIJ ` N .s, r 1 60„18 . ` B T RC t..;.,06781 ,;.,iw.� c ;=t + 1i�.c� ✓,: .' i , 6 PUBLICATIONS e 067818 CONTACTS INFLUENTIAL N.CONTINENTAL` CHEHtCAL.CO LoNp67819 E ,r � .rsx,.s , ,:::,3;•�,: i* ��, 067920 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES S10.202.52 19 OUTFALL ENGINE REPAIRS ' 067821 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $64.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL _067822 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 113n.00 CSD 17 ANNEXATION FEE (1119) 0678 3 DAILY L t ' s130600 LEG��CDVER �1(�` '.;t'�-11 " 't7 {,, a �•.*s; ._., 067824 DANIELS tIRE..SERVICE $8�389.29 TRUCK TIRE _. #D ..j'i' +`�k 1c+•� _ 067825 D�VALS" 'SA S COMPANY 4270116 P E UPPL ' 067826 DECKER INSTRUMENT SUPPLY CO. $310.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ' U FUNL' NO 9149 - JT PIST WCQK1NG CAPITAL PROCESSING. DATE 2/16/84 PAGE EPORT' NUMOEV COUNTY SANITATION b1STFICTS OF ORANGE COUNYY ' CLAIMS P4ID 02/22/84 I .I WAPRAN7 140. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 7F27 DECO t 5.8 2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �.I G67A2f DEB-FAR SALES 6 SERVICE $211.63 MANHOLE COVER ;; ) •� -_ 967E+25 DICKSONS _ $66.78 TRUCK PARTS 01.7s+ 5- lDP1VER TESTING CENTER $28.00 DRIEJEDEXAI � " 0(.7PZI L-T LAMINATING CO. 176.80 PAGER SUPPLIES P67n3a EASTMAN• INC. l616.2R OFFICE SUPPLIES "'1--- C67(l3x'T ERHARh OUIPM NT S1RI.42 TRU.CK PARTS " i C678v4 FAMILIAN FIFE It SUPPLY. $19297:67 •. PIPE SUPPLIES . _ G(.783a NICHAEL J. FILECCIA _ t14.00 EHPLOYtE HILPAGE FILTER SUFFLY CO. 11.231.8E• ENG NT-E PARTS ' '! 067R37 FI4ST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $49.00 CSD l2 IIECONVEYANCE RECORDING ; . P67P. FISCHE.R S PORTER CO. $39424.49 PIPE SUPPLIES >t C7d (•,6 p� _ C • t. = n 1 �� i8 G i, I 0671+4J VAL FOTH Ji SONS $35*618:9A " r CONTIkACtba. PW-109 G67P4L FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMrRA i14.5T "° FILM PROCESSING ^I !67Ay? DONALU L. FOX i ASSOCIATES S6'10.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT " .167E43 FRUIT GROUERS LABORATOP.Y• )NC• %26000 LAB ANALYSIS p ) 'I 067641s FnYEPS AUTO SPAS S7.15 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CE7645 CITY OF UL R 0 2 .04 S ' 067246 GW MAINTENANCE6 INC. - y 1552i76 '. ELECTRICAL 8UPPL'a1 �' J 067E4 7 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 16s620a16 TELEPHONE _ 267F414 114SCO OIL CO.• INC. $174.45 ENGINE OIL ■'� 067A45• E.G. HELLER•S SON* INC. S48.99 TOOLS s _ 0( 7r5D 14EPTZ CAR LEASING S327.54 VEHICLE LEASE 067E+51 NOLNEMi INC. 2i015s5CAUSTIC SODA C67652 HORIZON HIGH-REACH �. 194e71 VEHICLE PARTS , P67653 THE HOSE MAN 1203.52 ~HiSS> C67N54 CITY OF HUNTINGTON TEACH $9.31 WATER USEAGE " ('67F55 1;UNTINGTON PEACH RUBBER STAMP $49.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES ,J HUNTINGTOK SUPPLY 16q.40 SHALL HARDWARE 067857 HURLEY -ELEPTOONICS4 INC4 =' .i 0.88ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES " 067856 INPERIaL' WEST CHEMICAL Co. ._ si:J54.6B FERRIC CHLbAlbE ;' ; ,: .:. . J _ 067859 INDUSTRIAL THREADED'PRODUCT S 3289491 SMALL HARDWARE ++ n67A66 IVGERSCLL-RAND CO. $645.54 ENGINE PiZRTS ' P67861 INTFROY APERICA $12.272.16 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE „ J (16-7862 1RVINE INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPE. 1640.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE + C67R63 IRVINE' RANCA WA ER [115T IC t4.90 E �EAC€�- 067064 JERRY65 BACKHOE A CONSTa CO• 1424000 5-19 REPAIRS M �} _ 067865 KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS _ S198.60 _ SAFETY SUPPLIES 7E766(. KING, NEARING• INC. $109696.75 BEARING SUPPLIES ' C67067 L G N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO 13,672.54 UNIFORM RENTAL „} n67P6A L.P.W.S., INC. S755.87 WELDING SUPPLIES + 067869 A PSE CbUOR LAB 12 •44 FILM PROCESSING + " " 067870 LEFFINGWELL 1588.91 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 067871 LIGHTING. 01STRIBUTORSs INC. 1168.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _ 067E72 CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS 41.0.00 CSDOC /3 .MANHOLE REPAIRS - " O FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/84 PAGE 3 �n RT'NOW- R'. AP4 t. t4r: f fia t•' ti ''v"• �kft'0 SANI ON bi L 'OF"0 A G !i �vevsk"eft. }4yi:� ; '�+"Y ;u , 1 {� t}k 7 b T T I T S �,•, p •.t, a 1' ' P, '"'�y3�i ` ' r •' SAY I 5' RN COUNTY ' � ,f.: `�R , (D r " + WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 06787�" LDS' AN6 ES E `�' '''ta,. r .� .�:.:,51$+9 ,t :�: 0 L:; D E T 4 7'' f ' ''i�f , .ta,y7 - ->:-,•i q' tt� Y :7� 'hA.,<z1. zl.:• �1 'itl �s �.:i' 1t' w 067871 MAaD�N?•8USC0 pIPE':SIIPPLIES + 0�7875. IIARVAC_'tLEC#RQNtC$..i .7"�. �. _ ,xa`E:rr irt�` 5{ } 5 9?'aft-s;r'i .'i35209%+� s"�'.�.�aELEG� AI_SUPpllt�+} Ei'a��1► t : !r '�7 �q +*' u ,. 067876 MATT - CHLOR• INC. $262.77 PIPE SUPPLIES 067877 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS S53.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 067878 MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATIONS CO. $154.H5 LEGAL ADVERTISING ,+ .a PE9UPnt . P ALIGN�� N 'S :N.T'E—a 06788 Y� AFLIAr067B . sp US ; �uFciII U} 9�IPMN, t1ukm_ S �_L+ ,- . -r- r--�- -� 067e82 MISCO $22048.11 MUFFIN MONSTER PARTS y " " 067803 MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR COMPANY $298.48 PLANT /2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE , w 01,7884 MORGAN CRANE CO., INC. S2 021.35 CRANE PARTS w 06I885ATI C—LUH8tR SUPPLX�'' y " I w , C AR0 g.NEYARK`1I10 ON{C64. �[ ftcr ' BCEC7RICAI, �SURPLIE3 '.�,'+ a y..Jl_i11L3 06788R' ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $114.91 PIPE SUPPLIES " ? 23 067889 OWL CRANE 8 RIGGING S39905.45 CRANE RENTAL ` r 067890 OXYGEN SERVICE $33.00 DEMURRAGE n�' 'I 067 COON�Y'cSANITATION , A, < 8,' RBELUPL9 'r7 EEPNRIISN N";kH ORDISTRI i892 PP ' . 06789 067891 b H R$� b>01_}��•' >k» , ` q'F+Fua;:.r :'fi �iSc«; '43 Et I' aPAINtILIPPOWw,s i•r ,r i;.i , ': ��+ tr , y M a 1)671194 PACIFIC MCBILE OFFICES $150.52 PLANT 12 TRAILER RENTAL u ' n 067095 PACO S66.81 PUMP PARTS �tl ` 067896 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $28.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES " 067897 PACIFIC BELL TE 067898 PART UNLIM1IED ".; `we r "" i c AU . " ,t 1 '!�' ,, 1k ,•. b1;i8 ,, RU4`R:PAkt � 4Jr�•_ u•.•,r tx,\y +, {r ,: „O 06 899 N P aar �-t; N 0679CO PERMA-CAL CORPORATION $29385.32 ELECTRICAL S PPLIES n 067901 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS S126.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 410 067902 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $268.95 LAB SUPPLIES u UP P L E : ..• "y .�' ~t ' +.` `r.tt4;t " 067904 ; t P081MA8TEk ;,� T; ":�,.• j.'v ti''� L •er• 579+33., q '�1SC CNA66E ovf0AY�AID: ,eii �.�, {+e fyt' • �'; r °"' +{. F' 1:. - •'.. \ C ..�, 'thy, •- w�,_ 06790b``�x �` ?'Vt. 11AIOLG -PR IHROS � ICE`s`�. S4a"1E�";S:l il�;;Y,xyY:�=. } 'y ?� r ��� �'_1�IOUSTaV Attit CE:7906 QUALIFIED ELECTRIC SUPPLY $444.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ' 0(7907 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS S19.28 TRUCK PARTS 067908 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $334.00 RASH DISPOSAL + „-- -- 0 79U9t� .� , . 7N, RED E x 4 �. `1 ram' yy _,: • 9:9, .','. a ►, CL I`.CII. 067910 +' d1 t\ r xy} ! d,F i'y.. 0 q , .r �, + . ETER `' T ',t .�t� ra v':'Ys� �'2k`if V �ry '"�"� * .� 19b tY. I� -L {� xr•,s„ -t �r . a \>,M•,} !'.''{ +{. i B♦- ul. A4= A��ItK ''� 'S r Sr.,!- �r r'�' - w " 06791i1+ i 'J' O.ACHWAfCI{' %L'.s •lie rXr' .0 a, L. fir- w 067912 ROBBINS ,& MEYERS S780.73 PUMP PARTS ' 067913 JOSEPH T. RYERSON 8 SON. INC. $368.59 STEEL STOCK 067914 SANTA ANA DODGE $418.28 RQCK . T IS t439 a } 40'k AB � S75.84 LAB SU P�IE�=E ECRCHTOOE SA T W ELECRIIC-IC-MOTORS 5 :1t 71116' Nd6 �� St, + �067917 SCIktNE PRODUCi5 667910 SEACLIFF ESTATES $819261.00 INTEREST PAYMENT, COAST TRUNK SEWER-CSD all \ �C) , �(1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/84 PAGE 4 (i ',� . y,..•Ir)- :nlsr vt•r`n'� r t7. a 7 ;;•. a�i�„+��+ �s„r`l `4,'�i; ..rr' �c'4"y'�` ?�- �. .a _� � �"' L. � 'r.Q e- ��'•:.a,�>i � ?Il- '•"� , ^?" �`'�.` 'd7�r � ��` 7jVPt"�'a. .'$�i+�� 7 �`•1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 067919 s s s p t r L' r r .. � ,y. _ �' �iF• c �t.� ,.�,L - t}.J ',y.�7/y1;,} .Y -T }-. .5:�� � 1.t...'r .tfy• { .'rll Jv u 067920 SHALL 8'r1 HR N ,n it .;»• ,, ?' / :S A �.; A, . �a + ; jl '= '%fin?.. t.:; 1 c.; ;• .`� 'p#.• , �: t ¢ :�o, ,..! ,t,.. ENGRrj=�$R r ;: - ti; tit. f'" 11 + �6 921 H A q. 1. r. _ ,.S„ 7 AMAOCI�_ UP `' - S 41, 2+0 OWSAFEt1 i. 067922 SHFPHARD MACHINERY CO. S99993.67 LOADER REPAIRS " 11 11 067923 CHARLES SMITH CO.* INC. $79.72 TRUCK PARTS + 067924 SOUTHFRN CALIF. EDISON CO. S1049737.4R POWER It 17 6 SQ4D� $S,9- ti; S ,ts.N ri $*?i•'} s.T. '"; 'i'' 1� _ `!' ' y'r•�.�4a :. '1 1. . 067926 SPAR 067921lfLETIS pR NR}}4 (N �i '1E 7 .� ¢ fi- i QyY�• i �i ;.l THE SUPPV'tEAS"' :cK b r,.:y.,,! %i. a . '021 =.k n + 067928 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER S19471.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT " 067929 F.M. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING $360.00 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE +' 7 + 067930 THOMPSON LACOUER CO. $66.65 PAINT SUPPLIES +� is ,rg k � CJ< Y 'MI< 'ff 4 ♦ Je i.w. i Al FKCt - c ;�'i' ♦ Ok7932 Ht Q� .TftE �y, 7C.. eta ' 111;1'1-f�il ELCL067933TRUCK .� SUP L • '•:`i+� ''•,�,..a ••I.•r'{•• •./ .,,. tiP �. N': s:" 92i:77. t'�. ' tRUt`K'P��tS`.:.7_ + 067934 U.S. AUTO GLASS9 INC. S325.40 TRUCK REPAIRS " 067935 U.S.D. CORP. $36.70 LAB REPAIRS 71 �J 067936 UNION OIL L0. OF CALIF. S64.54 GASOLINE u Pt� 0679 67 93b87 V1E PAR r:. . ."IF i x,ri (f3•;jLAB `§Uapl JE$.:'''t'•,'�t • 4 � t1 '.•�ty: nT n�f'$ aj y 0£. Ir 3 . CWR SCIENTIFIC 0 ft I IES P ►� x Its,0679 „ +;t-"3tj'• `i .` d :,� . tt 067940 VAUGHAN♦S INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO 5360.50 ENGINE REPAIRS T + 067941 JOHN R. WAPLES $377.80 ODOR CONSULTANT ti67 067942 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $34.87 ENGINE PARTS r Of 7943 .W $. . 6 OU>aE E r. i' �J'1 �'� j ti" i xT,`:.S. 10 'fit' �' E TIt'1 -" " + 06T944 4� I1s YKT,StONE'� ASSbCAT ;i,K; ,. :°.SeL.7 > i'!p7 � ,`) C6FIi'Ul;�. PR�G Ah NQ� + �` = , ♦,Y'n `'� u � 067945 .. ►° :RgIIhKE 'R'''l10bpRUF� r L'EG` L'i.', SEp �� a � _„ "�.•r r i• '3 + 06794(1 YEROX CORP. $49183.33 XEROX REPRODUCTION " 067947 Y - TIRE $19746.08 TRUCK TIRE$ „ Q 067948 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES S243.38 VALVES r 9491 0 0 ��ty y -- - S4 i "'_ PA f 9U PL ESIs r I TOTAL CLAIM' [ AID 02/22/84 � ~$5209362.45 1+ 1 --- - i r ' 47d4 t _ 1 7-7 .4 1 '_ Ti '_.`t y.:.:�� 7:i�1 ti. t:.`} rjT�'3' .- r'•i }y1, '� :7,. :,1..,�tti'y:w o. t �:!. > .:►. .=•r:', �i.� - .1• /s 1 s' ��4 ttt +j.$ ��' .�. i s �;s� ncs .1 .�,rr �.1, 1 f.s ., r.{�k s�'.14':is�4.'"S.r, s �:i �Ya,i' ' '�i' 'G ' '-� �•` ti��' ✓1 ♦�. ` �. �„� ��i• .J,�n. -�'�It'j 1 :cy.dA-• ♦ Y♦a':� `V'1 f'" •r is r n•• 1 17 v � � l r) FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2 16 84 PAGE . � - ;. :i i, S ';-'1,• •'i.:� ?4S1 r�y, -'v,, _ � .� r ry ��_ ten,-„t:".*�.[�R.f•rr, t ���1 t ',�•�, t,. c -.1•:.� t tfi ty. `�i�4 (•�,J .t•i r.3 is h `, R yr •, 4' r , cdij�itY sA►�I tTOroN,o i s kith o� QRNAGE.=cbUiiT r. ... , �: ' :t. .� y KW'f, .,, 'i;'h 1,'. ;.r. l:. i I:G •.Y_l !�1' 'J `i!� '�•.'S' its ' t. + ./ 1. r . l k i m .:PAM Aii42/84.. w,IA. �- f 1 S ___-- — At UNT 11 CO FUN1L_ 12 OPER FUND 2,438.41 " 13 OPER FUND 9,614.82 1, #I AC_O_jU n .10 n , ., 15 OPER FUND .': 80 55 4, .� ,;.y+ , a n 1/ /5t A�COFUND . '�a: ;.vY.846�pp6;` r•�' Y +'f••3 .':.F�` 7 6_AriG FUND 1.. . r 1 t..:' { ,,.Mr -.. .7 a'>< .3. b" ��.•H.t' .�Jly r -r .Y•'Y.- '° . /7 OPER FUND 8,358.96 `3 " I7 ACO FUND 26.27 » 0 N 111_OUfl FlINJZ » x 1 ye- V+ w n +r •K� :.Y n • 'N13 ACO FUND ,•� .Q Z 4`' u F;,1;-trf ':}d'r.>• I,�,'�YM • ,�pn Ts•' f +. .,t M"t '• r � 1�,,h . { . n7 1 ` .y`v ,, ,�Y566DPERFUND '� '(R l+l o�y F: at 5 i y1. I + S. . �4i1�T f� A,. ; ^, t „ � .i, y�r•. �iy Sv t:. O' ' 1 _,,. i;.! �&y.' rr S, ir. s; h i » if CORF 94,811 .65 " SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 387.50 5 ELF FUNDED n 1` JT WORKING CAP(' A :rC�l�l�' y{,l; `i'� '1` `5 °: f,.�ro 'r? 19/�� i0.v�+M l !I # <DRM f .,tfh`, q�w` » %-n �a.�Y%V ' x�:•q/,?�r�t ;tt' ��' �frs�2} f .._T {�'•y�'�y} 1iy#? `.ft .,i',a'r s x��l r -Y \, •.7, r. 1 �, :ir: M9�oy� i R h.Ja^.?s.�e;`�....T"t:. i x •jv;r3. ''.. y DTItt--CLAIMS I it t -� �_'.�I ' •j •• %G n.!; �., 3'i^ -5;�' Mrl� II `If �M[' Fi` . r.O rf +t7{ .• i1; }� j n HC �r" _!� r• :l 1/ /f /f uO » / N :d�.:y ;- �' .1'n{C. }•'f i\ r .`7+.S ttij < fT inn:g z tir'L�.o� 'r: •t jY. i;�-, ?,yty;ibf - _ ' a 7.!' .r+3 17 '•�`. .' "`�y' 1.a. `+ " �i!l 1ti d� t< ' -�. ''E..�'" •�. �t. . p• ;IE;T'� 1:. �`- t.,2• :r'f, �,er' r,'i h, a ',s' i1..1, .st i•+f'�•c? V n .f�'s•''.5..:4 � ; !,.f�.,'al- � .<'1 ''r •ri.- .i+ } .1 .K� y_ 4 1N .,.., .� ''; r.71s.�44i ��. L W.,:,;if.L.`' ,'� » u fI N N u ,f , I /1 ,O 46 1 f Fy� _ ♦�.r�;x1� L`,. ^�' r. _ _-___. — .--. -_i __._----- r - —_,__r-y .�� >'�_ ...,. �I' �� ����}.5,, J .. , 5. '� fl 63 » '. 0 1, f ,i� '#}><4�i,.1,,'•``'((i ry`•1�,`�:/1 �iyyf���-r� �{.. r.�.�'1'{.r.f�1 ,y�.cr(. '„��(((' :t�Y(4 ..i . �.��X ..,, -r ��'✓ h•�} rl�•i;J/Cr<.�..I.r��•`•�t J'��.•... `1 3SR.L. . �� ` 'lJtr r' ,� :[y9 ''3 +.. n• '16 p L �•/ EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., March 14, 1984, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 8970 to White, That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Fine & Verville re providing to issue Change Order B to Purchase Order assistance in obtaining legislation No. 8970 issued to White, Fine & for the research project for deep Verville to provide assistance in ocean disposal of sludge obtaining legislation for the research project for deep ocean disposal of sludge, extending the term of said services through calendar year 1984, at no increase in the total authorized compensation of $100,000.00. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of March, 1984. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of March, 1984. /Jo 4 � Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts `� Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11