Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-02-15COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 9, 1984 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 7 WEDNESDAY) FEBRUARY lSJ 1984 -5:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.1 CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of February 8, 1984, the Board of Directors of County Sanitaticn District No. 7 will meet in an adjourned meeting at the abova hour a~d date. Secretary WHB: rb II ·' BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Offlc~ Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: oF Orange County, Califomia DISTRICT No. 7 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAYJ FEBRUARY lSJ 1984 -5:30 P.M. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ( 1) Roll call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) Report on sewerage facility requirements for the expanding development in the Irvine Business Complex area and establishment of separate zones to collect special connection fees to finance additional facilities required to serve this area: · (a} Review of study submitted by Boyle Engineering Corporation re additional sewerage facilities required (Received and filed by the Board at the February 8th Board Meeting) (b) .Review of Staff Report and recommendation re establishment of separate zones and connection fees to finance required additional facilities (4) (a) Consideration of motion approving Irvine Business Complex Study submitted by Boyle Engineering Corporation (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Staff Report dated February 9, 1984, re establishment of separate zones and connection fees to finance additional facilities required to serve the expanding "development in the Irvine Business Complex area. (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (5) Discussion (6) Consideration of actions relative to Ordinance No. 719, an Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Amending Ordinance No. 718, Establishing Separate zones Within the District and Establishing a Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits: (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (a) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance (b) Consideration of roll call vote adopting Ordinance No. 719, an Urgency. Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Amending Ordinance No. 718, Establishing Separate zones Within the District and Establishing a Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits (7) Consideration of motion declaring intent to amend the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk sewer Facilities to serve County Sanitation District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7, as follows: (a) Approve addition ot Main Street Relief Subtrunk (A 21-inch relief trunk paralleling the existing subtrunk in Main Street from Von Karman to Jamboree Boulevard) (b) Approve addition of Campus Relief Subtrunk (A 15-inch relief subtrunk paralleling the existing subtrunk in Campus Drive from Von Karman to Jamboree Boulevard) (cf Approve addition of Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force -~·lain (A 21-inch gravity relief trunk and 10-inch force main in Michelson Drive, paralleling the existing subtrunk, from V9n Karman to Jamboree Boulevard) (8) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare the preliminary environmental documents relative to the proposed amendments to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities to serve County Sanitation District No. 1, the Northern Half of District.No.· 6 and District No. 7 for the Campus Relief Subtrunk and Michelson Relief Subtrunk (Main Street Subtrunk is addressed in Draft EIR now out for public comment.) (9) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) requesting dual-track design to provide plans, specifications and bid documents for the Airport Relief Trunk to receive separate bids for a 39-inch ·sewer to serve District 7 needs and a 60-inch sewer that would provide additional capacity for District 14 (IRWD) needs. See page "A" (10) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Conunittee to negotiate an amendment to the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the ,Airport Relief Trunk, providing for a change in the scope .. of work due to the ~realignment of said trunk to Von Karman Avenue, which was :authorized by the .Board at the December 14, 1983 meeting, and to provide dua~-track design . . I to include capacity for Irvine Ranch Water District (proposed County Sanitation District No. 14), if written approval to pay additional costs of dual-track design is received from IRWD by February 28, 1984 (11) Other business and conununications, if any (12) Consideration of motion to adjourn -2-. ' , ~ I "A-1" Mr. Tom Dawes County San1tat1on D1str1ct of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Founta1n Valley, Cal1forn1a 92708 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELIEF TRUNK SEWER Dear Mr. Dawes: February 8, 1984 '. , . -: . : : . ' ' . : :.:.'::; 0417m2/84 PR 1.20305 Th1s letter 1s to 1nform you that 1t 1s the 1ntent of IRWD staff to request approval of the F1nance and Eng1neer1ng Comm1ttees 1 for IRWD's share of $20,790 for des1gn of the a1rport rel1ef trunk sewer. The F1nance Cormn1ttee 1tem 1s attached for reference. The Comm1ttee meet1ngs are scheduled for February 9 and 22, 1984. We plan on a formal reply w1th1n the deadl1ne of February 28, 1984 noted 1n your letter of January 30, 1984. The ant1c1pated approval of th1s request w111 cont1nue the ongo1ng wastewater treatment d1scuss1ons between our two D1str1cts. IRWD concurs w1th the proposal concept to pay 1ncremental construct1on costs at t1me of cqnstruct1on and then purchasing the prorata ~hare of the sewer capacity at t1me of use as a fa1r way to bu1ld jo1nt projects w1th future oversize - capac1ty. If you have any quest1ons, please feel free to call. S1ncerely, REY/SLM:lf Enclosure AGENDA ITEM #9 "A-1" INFORMATION "A-2" IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT FINANCE & PERSONNEL COMMITIEE Finance Conference Room £re "" ANO Pi}.NN\NG ENGH~ C.J\. ·l 5 PM, Thursday, February 9, 1984 nLE J ·111 Exhibit i. 1 9. COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -Lewinger None 1 We have received a preliminary response from the Sanitation Districts regardin~ our spreadsheet and assumptions. Staff will be conducting an in-depth analysis of assessed valuation of IRWO over the last s~veral years using County Tax Assessors' records. Staff will also be preparing "spread-. sheets" similar to the one prepared for the proposed Sanitation District No. 14 for each of the existing Sanitation Districts to determine the equity/inequHy of the IRWD situation as compared to the existing Sanitation Districts. Due to scheduling conflicts with the Sanitation Districts, staff does not anticipate to complete this work before the end of February. · We have also received a request from CSDOC for $20,200 so that Boyle Engineerihg·can do a dual design for the Airport Relief Sewer. The letter estimates IRWD's (CSD #14) share to be .$3,180,000 of which. they would like th.e incremental upsizing (39-inch to 60-inch) costs (estimated at $1 ,574,000) to be paid within three months of constructfon award in June 1984. Design has begun, but IRWD has until February 28, 1984 to decide on the dualc··design,option. AGENDA ITEM #9 "A-2" l II · MAHAGER•s AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT NO. ADJOURNED REGULAR FEBRUAR Y 15, 1984 - 7 t-1..EETING 5:30 D .m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fount ain V al le y, Cali f., 92708 Teleprcnes: Areo Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 Nos. 3 & 4: Review of Boyle Engineering and Staff Reoorts re Irvine Business Comolex The Directors were mailed a copy of the Irvine Business Complex Report with the agenda for the regular February 8 Board Meeting. This report was discussed briefly at the Board meeting and taken under study for consideration at this February 15 meeting. Enclosed with this agenda is a s taff report which details the need for a s peci al zone to provide additional connection fees for parallel facilities in this area. The staff will review these items in detail on Wednesday e vening . The s taff recomrnends approval of the Reports. No . 6: Actions Concerning Ordinance No . 719 In order to establish a separate zone for the Irv ine Business Complex and initiate connection fees for that a rea, it will be necessary to adopt a new ordinance. Because the majority of the development in the Complex area has been approved <e stimated 15 million square feet ) and building permits are available for these developments, the timing i s consi- dered critical. It is therefore recommended that Ordi n a nc e 719 be adopted as an Urgency Ordinance whi c h becomes effective imme - diatel y . This allows the waiving of the two readings and the 30 -day waiting period before final adoption. The staf f recomrnends a doption of the Urgency Ordinance for the establishment of a separate zone as set forth on Exhibit A and appropriate connection fees. No. 7: Declari ng Intent to Amend District No . 1, No rth Half of Di strict No. 6, and Distr i ct No. 7 Master Pl~n to Include Parallel Sewers to Serve the Irvine Business Comolex In accordance with the recomrnendations contained in the Boyle Engineering report on the Complex, the staff is recomrnending that 2/15/84 the Directors declare their intent to amend the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan for District No. 1, the North Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7 to provide for construction of the following facilities: 1. A 21" sewer relief trunk running parallel to the Main Street Relief Subtrunk from Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Blvd. 2. A 15" relief trunk required to serve increased develop- ment east of Jamboree Blvd. along Campus Drive. The relief sewer would extend from Von Karman to Jamboree Blvd. in Campus Drive. 3. A 21" gravity relief trunk and a 10" force main in Michelson Drive from Von Karman to south of the Michelson Drive Pump Station. A recommendation that these amendments be incorporated into the Master Plan will be made to the Directors of all three approving Districts (1, 6 & 7) at the March 14 regular Board meeting . No . 8: Au t horizing Staff to Prepare P r elimi nary Environmenta l Documents for Master Plan Amendments With the exception of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk, the Master Plan projects set forth in Item No. 7 above were not included in the Environmental Impact Report for the adopted Updated and Consolidated Master Plan for District No. 1 , North Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7. The staff has been advised by the EIR consultant, Courton and Associates, that a mitigated Negative Declaration could be pre- pared for these projects if approved. To accomplish this the staff would send a notice that we intend to prepare a Negative Declaration to the mailing list for the District 1 , 5 & 7 EIR and also publish the notice one time in a newspaper of general circulation . Through the preparation and evaluation of an Initial Study, the Districts could determine what the impacts of the project would be and incorporate into the Negative Declaration mitigation measures to offset those impacts. The mitigated Negative Declaration would then be circulated for public comment for a 30 -day period . These actions would only be necessary for the Campus and Michelson Subtrunks as the Main Street Subtrunk was included in the Master Plan EIR . The action appearing on your agenda is to authorize the staff to proceed with the preliminary preparation of the environmental documentation required by CEQA. -2- . .. ~ ... 2/15 /84 Nos. 9 & 10: Authorize the Selection Committee to Negotiate an Amendment t o the Agreement with Boyle Eng i neeri n g Corporation for Engineering Ser v ices re the Airport Relief Trun k Sewe r Design On December 14 t h e Directors approved a new Von Karman align- ment for the A irport Relief Trunk Sewer in order to a v oid construction in the John Wayne Airport area and better serve the Irvi n e Bus i ness Complex. The actions appearing on your agenda are t o recei v e and fi l e a letter from the Ir v ine Ranc h Water District concerning d u al design of t h is f acility to include capacity for District No. 14 should it be formed, and to authorize the Section Committ~e to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the engi- neering services agreement with Boyle Engineering for design of this facility. Items to be included in this Addendum are: 1. Increase the Scope of Work to include additional alignment studies for t h e V on Karman routing 2. Increase the contract amount to include additional design work for the new alignment 3. Increase t h e soils and survey allocation 4. Provide a dual track design to increase the size of the Airport Relief Sewer, Von Karman alignment from 39" to 60" to accommodate potential flows from IRWD if written approv al of added cost reimbursement is received from the Irvine Ranch Water District by February 28. Whe n an agreement h as been reached, the Selection Committee will submit its reco mme n dations to the Board for approval. FAH : J1•!S /jb -3- F red A . Harne r Gene ral Ma n a ger BoLJ/e EnoineerinQ Corporation 1501 Quail Street P 0 Box 3030 Newport Beach. Callfornia 92658 0469 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 consultlnQ eno1neers t architects 714 I 752·0505 Telex 68-5561 February 1, 1984 Irvine/Newport Beach Business Complex Study The Consolidated Ma ster Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities (adopted in December 1982) identified the required trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities to serve the District, based on the current and p r ojected land use planning at that time. Since adopting the master plan development planning details in the Irvine/Newport · Beach Business Center Complex (I /NBBC) have changed, yielding significantly greater densities for individual parcels than the average for the area as a whole. The I/NBBC study area, as shown on Figure 1, extends north of the San Diego Freeway to Barranca Road and south to Bristol Street and is bounded by the Newport Freeway on the west and the San Di e go Creek Channel on the east. Because of this density shift, the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer has been realigned and several subtrunks will need additional capacity to accommodate the various developments currently identified by the respective p l ann ing jurisdictions. These revisi ons and additions would result in construction cost s g reater than those presented in the master plan adopted in December 1982. The Dis t rict is considering establishing a special zone with boundaries delineated in Fi g ure 1 and se t tin g a connection fee to finance these additional facilities. This study iden t ifie s the additional facilities required a nd provides estimated construction costs. Land Use Land use within the I/NBBC is classified industrial/commercial wit h four large ho tels in operation, tw o major ho tels under construction, and fi ve othe rs proposed :or co ns truct i on . The density varies somewhat from north to sou th with the mo st i ntense dens it y centered south of th e San Diego Freeway. Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-February 1, 1984 The recent Airport Relief Trunk Sewer route investigation identified the major proposed developments located south of the San Diego Freeway and within the Main Street Subtrunk' s service area. The City of Irvine provided details of specific developments for the remaining portion I/NBBC north of the San Diego Freeway. In analyzing the data received from the City, the proposed developments within the area north of the Main Street Subtrunk are not expected to exceed the average density of those developments projected in the master plan. In the entire study zone, the new developments currently proposed are comprised mainly of office buildings and hotels that would add to the area: Office Buildings Hotels (3,652 rooms) Total Projected Flows 15,000,000 square feet 2,557,000 square feet 17,557,000 square feet To assess the impact of the proposed increased development densities, the average flow for each development proposal was· projected and compared with flows allowed in the master plan for the same parcel. When the updated average flow was greater than the ma st er .Pl an av er age flow contribution for the respective parcel the trunk system was re-analyzed for adequate capacity using the methodology and peak-to-average relationship outlined in the master plan report was used. The analysis showed that the Mc Gaw Subtrunk tr i b~tary area serving the northerly portion of the study area was adequate in capacity and that the development densities proposed within this tributary area do not contribute additional flow. The analysis presented in our November 1, 1983 report for the Airport Relief Trunk route investigation identified that the updated projected flows for the tributary area of the Main Street Subtrunk, north of San Diego Freeway, exceeds the master plan tributary flow. In addition, the route investigation of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer determined that due to the distribution of the newly proposed high intensity developments south of the San Diego Freeway, a revised Airport Relief Trunk alignment would maximize use of the existing trunk and subtrunk system. However, three additional existing subtrunks will still require relief due to the developments proposed at their upstream ends. These are the Main Street Subtrunk, the Michelson Subtrunk, and Campus Drive Subtrunk east of Von Karman Avenue. The overall projected average flow increase from the I/NBBC study area over and above the master plan flow is 1.4 mgd bringing the total to 15.4 mgd. Mr. Fred A. Harper -3-February 1, 1984 Additional Required Facilities The additional required facilities to serve the Irvine/Newport Beach Business Complex include: 1. Revised Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Alignment As discussed in the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Route Investigation, the revised alignment would serve the District with greater flexibility. Not only would the alignment be located closer to the intense development densities, but it would maximize use of existing. subtrunk facilities. The revised Airport Relief Trunk would include the relocation of the South Irvine Lift Station and Force Main. 2. Main Street Relief Subtrunk As mentioned in the previous section, the upper reach of the existing Main Street Subtrunk would be taxed because of the increased development in the vicinity· of the Jamboree Boulevard and Main Street intersection. To provide the required relief of the existing subtrunk, a 21-inch sewer relief trunk is recommended to parallel the existing subtrunk from Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard. This relief trunk would be an additional facility over and above the adopted master plan. 3. Campus Relief Subtrunk The existing Campus Subtrunk's capacity is inadequate to serve the increased development areas east of Jamboree Boulevard along Campus Drive. A 15-inch relief trunk would be required to serve the intensified area and would extend from Von Karman to Jamboree Boulevard in Campus Drive. The Campus Relief Trunk is also an additional facility over and above the master plan. 4. Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main In view of the intense development plans projected east of Von Karman and south of Michelson Drive, the existing gravity sewer and force main in Michelson Drive (from Von Karman and south of Michelson Drive Pumping St at ion) w i 11 be deficient in cap a c it y • Therefore, a 21-inch gravity relief trunk and 10-inch force will be required to provide adequate relief of the existing sewer facilities, as shown on Figure 1 ... These facilities are also additional facilities, over and above the master plan. Mr. Fred A. Harper -4-February 1, 1984 5. McGaw Subtrunk As stated in the previous section, the McGaw Subtrunk was not affected by the development densities proposed with in its tributary areas. Therefore,· -the master plan improvements are adequate. 6. South Irvine Lift Station Recent increases within the I/NBBC would require up-sizing the South Irvine Lift Station to handle the additional 1 .4 mgd flow, over and above the master. plan. In addition, with the new alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk, the Land Road Pumping Station will be consolidated with the South Irvine Lift Station for more efficient operation. Consolidation· of the Lane Road Pumping Station with the South Irvine Lift Station will yield a 15.4 mgd flow to the South Irvine,Lift Station. 7. Pumping Station Modifications As stated in the master plan, four existing pumping stations (Lane Road, Michelson Drive, McGaw, and MacArthur) would require minor modifications to serve the I/NBBC. With the recent adoption of the revised Airport Relief ·Trunk Sewer alignment and relocation of the South Irvine Lift Station, the Lane Road Pumping Station will be taken out of service. Since the flows to the McGaw Lift Station are the same as projected for the master plan, the modifications recommended in the master plan remain the same. Flows to the Michelson Drive and MacArthur Pumping Stations have increased slightly, but· the modifications recommended in tt:ie master plan are capable of handling the increased flow. Estimated Construction Cost Due to the addition of new facilities and avoided costs of the deleted facilities, a direct comparison of additional costs can not be related to the master plan facilities on a facility by facility basis. Estimated construction costs of all facilities to serve the study area with the current proposed land use conditions are compared with original master plan facility costs in Table 1. The recently amended Airport Relief Trunk route voided the costs of the following master plan facilities: 1. Main Street Relief Subtrunk --Lane Road Pump Station to MacArthur Boulevard 2. South Irvine Relief Subtrunk Mr. Fred A. Harper -5-February 1, 1984 3. Lane Road Pumping Station Modifications However, the cost of the revised Airport Relief Trunk increased by_ two pipe sizes, with the newly proposed Main Street Relief Subtrunk, Campus Relief Subtrunk, and the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main will result in a net additional construction cost of $1,290,000 • . Should you or your staff wish to review this report in further detail, we are available at your convenience. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION c~~~~<J~ Regional Vice President encl. kh OC-C07-135-00 TABLE i ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF TRUNK SEWER FACILITIES TO SERVE THE IRVINE/NEWPORT BEACH BUSINESS COMPLEX FACILITY 1. Airport Relief Trunk 2. Campus Relief Subtrunk 3. Michelson Relief Subtrunk & Force Main (Von Karman-Michelson Pumping Station) 4. Main Street Relief Subtrunk (Von Karman-Jamboree) 5. Main Street Relief Subtrunk (Lane Rd. P. S. MacArthur) 6. South Irvine Relief Subtrunk CS. I. Lift Station -Red Hill) 7. South Irvine L.S. Force Main (S. I. Lift Station -Red Hill) 8. McGaw Subtrunk Parallel 9. Pumping Station Modifications: a. Lane Road Pumping Station b. Michelson Drive Pumping Station c. McGaw Lift Station d. MacArthur Pumping Station 1 o. South Irvine Lift Station TOTAL INCREASE CONSOLIDATED (l) MASTER PLAN $2,425,000 280,000 283,000 225,000 355,000 110,000 60,000 155,000 65,000 1,525,000 $5,483,000 ( 1) From Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities, District· Nos. 1, · 6, and 7, December 1982 (2) From report of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Route lnv~stigation, November 1, 1983 (includes two pipe size increases) FACILITIES REQUIRED TO SERVE CURRENTLY PROPOSED LAND USES $3, 520, 000 ( 2) 215,000 275,000 319,000 79,000 355,000 30,000 60,000 155,000 65,QOO 1,700,000 $6,773,000 $1,290,000 . .., 47 " /c . I ATION ""'·.. ~ INDARY "" ... -~ r-=~•1fiav~1N~E/N=E=wr=o~RT--,---_J . ~ g, BUSINESUOMPLEX FEB.1984 STUDY FIGURE 1 _BE: AGENDA ITE M #3 CB) & #4(s) February 9, 1984 STAFF REPORT Irvine Business Conplex COUNTY SANITATION DI STR ICTS of Q RANGE COUNT Y, CALIFORNIA PO.BOX 8 127 10844 ELLIS AVEN UE FO UNTAI N VALLEY , CALIFORN IA 92 708 (71 4) 540-29 10 (71 4) 962-2 41 1 The District has received a report dated February 1, 1984 prepared by Eoyle Engineering Corporation which re-examines the sewer needs of the Irvine Business Canplex as they relate to land use changes which have occurred since the pre- paration of the Consolidated Master Plan of TrUnk Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation Districts No . 1 , North Half of No. 6, and No. 7, adopted in Deceml::er, 1982. Since the preparation of the Master Plan report, very significant land use changes approved for the Complex have increased projected densities and wastewater flow . The Complex is served by local sewers a.vned by the Ci ties of Irvine and Newport Beach and .the County of Orange , and trunk and subtrunk sewers owned by County Sanitation District No. 7 . This report analyzes the improve- ments necessary for the Sanitation District 's trunk and subtrunk sewer system. The consul tant reviewed current l and use plans fo r the Business Complex and determined that ther e are seven new hotel sites with over 3 , 600 roc:ms expected plus 15 ,000 ,000 square feet of new office space planned or under devel oprrent . Three relief sewers, shown on the attached map , which wil l parallel existing sewers are needed : 1 . Construction of the Main Street Reli e f Subtrunk between Von Kannan Avenue and Jamroree Boulevard . This facility , a 21-inch relief trunk , will parallel the existing line to serve new developrrent located north of Main Street and . east of Jamroree Boulevard . <Highlighted in yellow. ) 2 . campus Relief Subtrunk extending fran Von Kaman Avenue to Jarntor ee Boulevard in campus Drive. This 15-inch trunk sewer, paralleling the existing line, will serve developrrent located adjacent to Campus Drive and east of Jaml:oree Boulevard . (Highlighte:l in orange .) 3. The Mich elson Rel ief Subtrunk and For ce Main between Von Karman Avenue and Jamror ee Boulevard in Michelson Drive . This 21 -inch relief line and 10 -inch force rrain will parallel existing facilities to serv e expected developrrent on Michelson Drive and east of Jarntoree Boulevard . (Highlighted in green .) The report also est.irrates the cost increases for the Von Kaman aligrurent of the Aiq:ort Relief Trunk and the proposed South Irvine Lif t Station resulting frcm the land use changes. The construction costs f o r the new relief subtrunk sewers Irvine Business Complex Page 2 February 9, 1984 and upgrading of planned facilities are $1,290,000. The total estimated cost of the needed facilities is tabled below: 1. Constructio n costs of new facilities 2 . Contingencies at 10 % 3. Engineering and Contract .Administration charges a t 15% $1, 290 I 000 130,000 195 t 000 65,000 4. Charges payable at 5% to cities for collection of District fees 'TOTAL : $1,680,000 Staff believes that the rrost cost effective way to implerrent the recarmendations in the report is to form a special zone within County Sanitation District No. 7. A connection fee sufficient to pay for the facilities needed to serve the new developrent could be levied in that zone. The report estimates that the developrent would total approximately 17,500,000 square feet of office and hotel buildings. However, certain projects have already received connection penni ts when the building penni ts were obtained and certain other projects may be delayed or postp:med indefinitely; therefore, the calculation for a zone fee was based on 75 percent of the estimated dev eloprrent, or 13, 125, 000 square feet. The zone connection fee has been calculated as follows: 1. The existing District-wide connection fee ($0.05/S .F.) 2. Cost of the needed facilities ($1,680,000/13,125,000 S.F.) ($0.128/S.F.) 'TOTAL ($0.18/S.F.) $ 50 .00 /1,000 S.F . 128.00/1,000 S.F . $1 78.00/1,000 S.F. Say $180 .00 /1,000 S.F. REX:XlvlMENDATION: Pd.opt urgency Ordinance No. 719 creating Zone 2, the Irvine Business Complex zone, and set connection charges for new construction other than dwelling units at $180 per 1,000 square feet. T rr ATI p • ;' . . I\ L~ [JJ . . . . D EXISTING TRUNK PROPOSED TRUNK PUMP OR LIFT STATION STUDY AREA BOUNDARY MC GAW SUBTRUNK DRAINAGE AREA MAIN ST. SUBTRUNK DRAINAGE AR EA ......... " 0 Oll L=====- . .;-;;-. IRVINE/NEWPORT BUSINESS 'CO MPLEX STUDY ., ' FEB. 1984 FIGURE 1 AIRP RELIEF RE: AGENDA ITEM #6 ORDINANCE NO. 719 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 718, ESTABLISHING SEPARATE ZONES WITHIN THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS WHEREAS, the use of District sewage facilities are generally regulated by the provisions of Ordinance No. 718; and ~HEREAS, the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Fa- cilities, adopted in December, 1982, identified the required trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities to serve the District, based on the projected land use planning at that time; and ~HEREAS, in recent years, great amounts of commercial, off ice and industrial development have occurred within the District, yielding significantly greater·densities for individual parcels than the average for the area, as identified in the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities; and _WHEREAS, the District's Deputy Chief Engineer has prepared a report establishing that existing trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities in certain areas of the District are operating at maximum capacity and require additional capacity to accommodate planned development within the District; and ~HEREAS, the District has determined that plans have been formulated and considered in the area designated as the Irvine Business Complex Area which would add approximately 17,557,000 square feet of commercial, office and industrial space to the area; and WHEREAS, the District has completed a study of necessary facilities in the Irvine Business Complex Area, in order to provide sewer service to the lands to be developed in the future; and ~HEREAS, the District determines that the sewer service needs throughout the.District vary considerably: and ~HEREAS, the District has adopted a schedule of fees to be paid for connecting to the District's facilities, which fees are to be used by the District to pay for the cost of construction of trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities; and _WHEREAS, the District has determined that the cost of construction of additional necessary trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities will be unable to be met if the present connection fee schedules, used to finance such projects, remain unchanged; and WHEREAS, the creation of separate zones within the District will allow for better planning and development of the sewage facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: Section No. 702 of Ordinance No. 718 is hereby amended to read: "702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CONNECTION CHARGES A. The District is divided into two (2) separate zones for purposes of development and regulation of sewage facility use. Said zones are established as follows: -2- ·. Zone 1: All that territory within the District, exclusive of that territory within Zone 2; Zone 2: All that territory described as the Irvine Business Complex Area. The precise boundaries of each of the above Zones are set forth and shown on Exhibit 'A' and incor- porated herein by this reference. B. District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein: 1. Connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $250.00 per dwelling unit. 2. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $250.00 per dwelling unit. 3. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial -3- buldings, hotels and motels, and public buildings, the connection charge shall be: Zone l -$50.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new;1construction shal 1 be $250. 00; Zone 2 -$180.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $250.00. 4. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated o~ the same basis as provided in i Paragraphs 1 ~nd 3 above. If such replace- ment construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construe- tion. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. -4- 5. Connection charges for additions or altera- tion of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $250.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than dwelling buildings, it shall be $50.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construc- tion shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 6. Trunk connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and con- necting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less than $400.00 plus the applicable regular connection charge for d~elling units hereinabove specified. 7. Connection charge, off-site sewers not a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement agreements: The charges for connections to off-site sewers which are not included as a part of the -5- ·• District Master Plan and for which a Non- Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shall be in the amount pro- vided for in said Agreement. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount I. due whet~er the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. These connection charges shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to said facilities. 8. Trunk connection charge, commercial or in- dustrial establishments: $10.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than $500.00, plus the applicable regular connection charge for new construction and existing structur~s other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified. 9. Assessment District connection charge: The regular connection charges provided in the preceding subsections of this Article, plus a sum of money equal to the assessment charge without interest, or Treasurer's charge which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are located had -6- said real property been assessed within the Assessment District which constructed or ac- quired the Assessment District sewer to which connection is made." Section 5: If any provision or Section of this Ordinance is declared to be unlawful, invalid, or in any manner unen- forceable, then each and every other provision herein shall remain in force as though enacted independently. Section 6: This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency measure and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as a measure necessary to preserve the public health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the urgency are that the existing trunk sewer facilities are operating at maximum capacity, and the District has determined that the construction of additional trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities is necessary in order to provide sewer service to lands for which plans are being formulated and considered for development. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, held February 15, 1984. Chairman of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California -7- ' . ~ :3' ..... ()--; .:A :: ( ~I MICHELSON RELIEF SUBTRUNK & FORCE MAIN ( '-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----~- ( ' _ .... • ,-·,1 ..-..~ ~ ~-.-.-.---··~-;r---.. ~ l:. !.j '* , l ·" 'F...;, ~--~ fl/ II· ......... 7 __ ~--:-1:1-. L~ PUMP OR LIFT STATION w: t Wh STUDY ~REA BOUNDARY r:::::«l ~ D MC GAW SUBTRUNK DRAINAGE AREA MAIN ST. SUBTRUNK DRAINAGE AREA ~, ••h IRVIHE (FEB.19841 BUSINESS COMPLEX --- ZONE 2 FIGURE 1 ~-1 RE : AGENDA ITEM #6 REVISED 2/15/84 ORDINANCE NO. 719 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CbUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNT~, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 718, ESTABLISHING SEPARATE ZONES WITHIN THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS WHEREAS, the use of District sewage facilities are generally regulated by the provisions of Ordinance No. 718; and WHEREAS, the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Fa- cilities, adopted in December, 1~82, identified the required trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities to serve the District, based on the projected land use planning at that time; and WHEREAS, in recent years, great amounts of commercial, off ice and industrial development have occurred within the District, yielding significantly greater densities for individual parcels than the average for the area, as identified in the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities; and WHEREAS, the District's Deputy Chief Engineer has pre~ared a report establishing that existing trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities in certain areas of the District are operating at maximum capacity and require additional capacity to accommodate planned development within the District; and WHEREAS, the District has determined that plans have been formulated and considered in the area designated as the Irvine Business Complex Area which would add approximately 17,557,000 square feet of commercial, office and industrial space to the area; and WHEREAS, the District has completed a study of necessary facilities in the Irvine Business Complex Area, in order to provide sewer service to the lands to be developed in the future; and WHEREAS, the District determines that the sewer service needs throughout the District vary considerably; and WHEREAS, the District has adopted a schedule of fees to be paid for connecting to the District's facilities, which fees are to be used by the District to pay for the cost of construction of trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities; and WHEREAS, the District has determined that the cost of construction of additional necessary trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities will be unable to be met if the present connection fee schedules, used to finance such projects, remain unchanged; and WHEREAS, the creation of separate zones within the District will allow for better planning and development of the sewage facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the Beard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: Section No. 702 of Ordinance No. 718 is hereby amended to read: "702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CONNECTION CHARGES A. The District is divided into two (2) separate zones for purposes of development and regulation of sewage facility use. Said zones -2- f are established as follows: Zone 1: All that territory within the District, exclusive of that territory within Zone 2; Zone 2: All that territory described as the Irvine Business Complex Area. I The precise boundar~es of each of the· above Zones are set forth and shown on Exhibit 'A' and incor- porated herein by this reference. B. District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein: 1. Connection charge for new ccnstruction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $250.00 per dwelling unit. 2. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $250.00 per dwelling unit. 3. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: -3- For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels, and public buildings, the connection charge shall be: Zone 1: $50.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, proiided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $250.00; Zone 2: $180.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $250.00. 4. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs 1 and 3 above. If such replace- ment construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destructio~ of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construe- tion. In no case shall such credit exceed -4- the connection charge. 5. Connection charges for additions or altera- tion of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the ~· area of buildings to be used for dther than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be: zone 1: $250.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than dwelling buildings, it shall be $50.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units; Zone 2: $250.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than d~elling buildings, it shall be $180.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction -5- shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 6. Trunk connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided ~· ~that no such charge shall be less than $400.00 plus the applicable regular connec- tion charge for dwelling units hereinabove specified. 7. Connection charge, off-site sewers not a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement agreements: The charges for connections to off-site sewers which are not included as a part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non- Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shall be in the amount pro- vided for ih said Agreement. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. These connection charges shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to said facilities. -6- 8. Trunk connection charge, commercial or in- dustrial establishments: $10.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than $500.00, plus the ap- plicable regular connection charge for new construction and existing structures other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified. 9. Assessment District connection charge: The regular connection charges provided in the preceding subsections of this Article, plus a sum of money equal to the assessment charge without interest, or Treasurer's charge which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are.located had said real property been assessed within the Assessment District which constructed or acquired the Assessment District sewer to which connection is made." Section 5: If any provision or Section of this Ordinance is declared to be unlawful, invalid, or in any manner unen- forceable, then each and every other provision herein shall remain in force as though enacted independently. Section 6: This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency measure and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as a measure -7- •,, ... -....,L necessary to preserve the public health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the urgency are that the existing trunk \._) sewer facilities are operating at maximum capacity, and the District has determined that the construction of additional trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities is necessary in order to provide sewer service to lands for which plans are being formu- 1 lated and considered for deve~opment. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, held February 15, 1984. Chairman of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California -8- ~ ~ ~ ~ A :: -····-:•. ( ( [ill] r=-1 L:.!:__l ( • ·~ .I ZONE" 2. I FIGURE I ........ : IRVINE IFEB.1984 BUSINESS.COMPLEX ._..__ •• ~. t ..... . ··-... MEETING DATE Feb. 15' 1984 DISTRICT 1 TIME 5 :30 p.m. DISTRICTS 7 (CRANK),,,,,,,.HANSON •• , ,,, (LUXEMBOURGERLGRISET.,, • •• ------ ( HOESTEREY) •••• SALTARELLI I.------ (WI EDER) •• ,,,,,STANTON,, ••• :::::::::::::: DISTRICi 2 (MURPHY) ••••••• WEDAA •••••• I (OVERnOLi},, ••• ROTH,,,,,,,,----............... ..... (ADLER),,,,, ••• BROWN,,,, ••• ::::::: ............... ..... !NELSON),, ,,,,,COOPER ................ :::::::: KUZNIK),, ,,,,,HOLT •••• ,,,, · LUXEMBOURGER>. GRIS ET I I I I I.------ !ODLUM) •• I I I. I .KAWANAMI •••• -.----- CULVER) ••••••• PERRY •• ••••.-----------BEYER),,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,,---.......... --- (WIEDER),,•••• .STANTON ••••• ---............... ..... (HOLMBERG),,,,,WEDEL •• ,,,,,----............... ..... (CATLJN),,,,,,,WJNTERS ••••• :::::::::::::: DISTRICT 3 (OLSON).. I •• I I .FINLAYSON. I·------(PARTIN) •• ,,,,,MULLEN,,,,,, (ADLER),,,, ,,,,BROWN,,,,,,,------:::: (PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,,::::::::: .......... (SEIDEL)., ••••• FRESE •••• Ill (RISNER),,, •••• GRGAS ••••••• ----............... ..... (DAVIS),,,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,,, ..................... -- (LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET •••••• :::::::::::: (RELL) I'. I I I I I .MARSHOTT I I I·-- (COOPER) ••••••• NELSON...... ---:::::: (OVERHOLT),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,,--:::: ..... ..... (WIEDER),, ,,,,,STANTON,,,,,:::: ............... ..... (SELVAGGJ),,,,,SYLVIA...... __ (MANDIC),,,,,,,THOMAS.,,,,,----:::: .......... (HOLMBERG) •• I I. WEDEL. I •• 11 .::::: ----(CATLIN),, ,,,,,WINTERS,,,,, ____ .................... ulSTRICT 5 (MAURER),, ,,, •• HART,,,,,,,, ____ ............... ..... (HEATHER),,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,, ____ ............... ..... (WIEDER),, ,,, •• STANTON,, •• • ......................... ..... DISTRICT 6 (SMITH). I 11. I I .WAHNER ••• I I. --- (MAURER) ••••••• HART •••••••• ----............... ..... (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,, ,, .::::: :::::: ..... ..... DISTRICT 7 (BEYER),,,,,,,,SMITH,,,, ••• ~ ............... ..... (MAURER),,,,,, .HART.,,,,, •• .....Jtt!!:. ............... ..... ( HOESTEREYL. I. EDGAR. I ••• I ·-Wf!!:. .......... -- (LUXEMBOURGER) I GR I SET. I I I I ·-AL -- (WIEDERL •• I I I .STANTON. I I I.~:::: -- (AGRAN) •• ,,, ••• VARDOULIS ••• ~ ............... ..... (GREEN),,,,,,,,WAHNER •••••• ~----..... ..... DISTRICT 11 (MAC ALLISTER). BAILEY.' I I I·------(MAC ALLISTER),PATTINSON, • •--___ _ (WIEDER),,, •••• STANTON .............................. ..... 1/17/84 ~~~~~~~~~~~-- JO INT BOARDS (MAC ALLISTER).BAILEY,,,,,, !ADLER)t•••••••BROWN,,,,,,,:::::::::::::::: NELSONJ.,,,,,,COOPER,,, ••• PERRY),,,,,, •• CULVER,,,,,,-------- (HOESTEREY),,,,EDGAR ••••• ,,---.......... (OLSON)t•••••••FINLAYSON,, .:::::: :::::: (SEIDELJ •••• ,,,FRESE.,,,,,, (RISNER),,,,,,.GRGAS ••• ,,,,----..... ..... (DAVIS),,,,,,,,GRIFFJN,., •• ~--..... ..... (LUXEMBOURGER). GR I SET I I I I I .---- ! CRANK) 11 I I. I I I HANSON. I I 11 .---- MAURER) ••••••• HART •••••••• ::::::::::: KUZNIK),,,,,,,HOLT,,,,,,,, !ODLUM)),,,,,,,,KAWANAMJ,,,,:::::::::::: RELL It I I I I I I I MARS HOTT I I I I PARTINJ,,,,,,,MULLEN,,,,,.~--~-- (COOPER),,, ,,,,NELSON,,,,,,~--~-- !MAC ALLISTER). PATTINSON,,,---- CULVER) •• ,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,,----~-­ HEATHER),,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,.~--.......... (OVERHOLT)t•••1ROTH,,,,,,,,::::::::: (HOESTEREYJ,,,,SALTARELLI,, !BEYER)t'''''''SMITH,,,,,,,:::::::::::: WIEDERJ,,,.,,,STANTON,,.,, SELVAGGJ),,,,.SYLVJA,, ,,,,~--~-­ MANDJC),,,,,.,THOMAS,,,.,,~------ !AGRAN). 1111111VARDOULIS1 I.---- GREEN/SMITH) •• WAHNER •••••• ~--~-­ MURPHY),,,.,,.WEDAA,,,,,,,-------- HOLMBERG),,,,,WEDEL,, ,,,,,-------- (CATLJN),,,,,,,WINTERS,,,,,::::::::::: STAFF: OTHERS: HARPER.,''''~--.......... SYLVESTER,,, CLARKE,,,,,,:::::::::: DAWES,,,,,,, ______ __ ANDERSON,,,,~--~--BUTLER.,,,,, ______ __ BROWN,,,,,,, ______ __ BAKER,,,,,••----__ __ KYLE,,,,,,,, ____ .......... YOUNG,,,,,,, ____ --- WOODRUFF,,,,~--__ __ HOHENER,,,,, ______ __ HOWARD,,,,,, ____ .......... HUNT,,,,,,,, ______ __ KEITH,,,,,,, ____ ~-- KNOPF,,,,,··~~ __ __ LE BLANC••••~--__ __ LINDSTROM. I·----LYNCH ••••••• ______ __ MARTINSON,,, ______ __ PEARCE''''''~--__ __ -... .. ... T - - f -rµ.D ~-fof;l'. ~,4 SS1/~ {_,AJJ1> u ~e-Cfl ~&E -hi..(. t1J1.1 )v ;JJJ 70 Coµ!{ / f.v_;,~( CoMfc..b'f.. -@.. 2; Sbo A ~ -Q,,\Jc,,e /y 8 L-)'}llSTl-f_ ft.~ 1tl::of!El> 1 £/(jv1&M1 )12DL ])t!Yt, fl~ I ftffRot/l::i> - 1 Lb f/o ~L.~ Abw I 2-{) ,.J'J)tf,L cc;J.i. TI:::;-fi £Mit::-P -Al>D 56 '.50 f:&oM s. o(c:.5(+!.~/ I G.. /~M11. ~ f~~l:'i) v...t0~t<L <:c:V~1-Ml!i1J sr -.ifJv..T;I oF .s.D MY- @J .f ),(.bb > ~TCP... ft;JJ -@. b.51-111 (..oNJ;.7. &j.T--p 1 fl . A-IP~v~ Af'I: f?n.1tF To V@J t-IJ.LM;;J /J/111~;1<-111 ~r /at( to -7- tt/,? l'fM -+-/o~~ ~i. 1-/~fo ('o~T -/ ~'/., c_/FIH:>Mr'iJ/<7ouc-IA7o)J 0 -~S.71'f{ ffi,-~.-tv1 ~/#-+~/¢;:_ ))d-, YA-4-]0J.Al}t -T7G : NO f'f!?,tll!rJ.;:. ! -~o - .-.. 1 -/)..~ f6f,tv1. rn. ffkt NO{ ~o lo gux. f~j/.N./T.I, /.;;c/1 ~J)) Crn or r/n/1,Jg/rf:rrz-; oF Nt -/)1,,t otL- 1-(o..) ~(b J -/4.1~ -IA~~ I • ? {__o..) -TI»l J{>f,iw~tc£-,IM~lf/'i?F ~ eJ~ ~;J.;µJtE • -=-E>frl If fl-,lf-Ov. ut · Nl) t-f/~€ ~ ~I µ.ft -Ao --'7' ~ Honu. ~ ~or J>uB.L1~~ UM 1~-Y~ , -s~: C-OM M Ll~ -t-f-o TFL I -1-( ~-J 1 (~) t '--) -.::r uJ J : -' v,« At. -bc:Jp µ1S!([fl f u); fu /iJ GL , /t.W 1 L-~u,_rn~_;_ fu4ct 6~ /1 ~ T7 A(f::.JPA ~ }..{A-f-Cf/ -M. /.s. -(). /\)~~ - 8 -11/j -t,tN~ T --~ £k.1~(,rr1~/ :rod (,JJ~ -to M/ J-f-WD MIR<Yvc'O ft ie1 ').J:;o -Dw. i/1</81 - ~v-PjhceD Lri'..-~ -=--~--""= .. .. . -••• ;E -., • • J~ -Af>D 1 1-# hw.f-t=b -Lo~6t-"'{L/hfi~;.u~r ~ M>J> '<..-~It~/ ~0 1 ~ li>of!.-~-fAs.s,. ~C:.I{ )Tef'v{ -::/?Ufr1-7flA0 N~ : f!rJ~ CtMrt !>1f yf;)-,'l-P<Ju,_1,1, -f~~ ~ ~ /flJJf ,#!hv'~ I /fN~~~ ._x-4JI; tJJ1u._ bo -Mf-u.Al~ . -..