HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-02-08~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. SOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
February 1, 1984
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2J 3J SJ 6) 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY) FEBRUARY 8J 1984 -7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
. (
I i I y,('(
'
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Cou~ty,
California, will be held at the above hour and date.
Secretary
Scheduled UEcomiE..9. Meetings:
FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE -Wednesday, February 15th at 4:30 p. re. ..
DISTR!:CT .., ADJ. MTG. -Wednesday, Febrt:a.ry 15th at 5:30 p.m. I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, February 29th at 5:30 p.m.
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 81 27
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962·24, 1
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
Feb 8, 1984 Feb 29, 1984 (NOTE: This date
was changed from
2/22/84)
Mar 14, 1984 Mar 22, 1984
Apr 11, 1984 Apr 25, 1984
May 9, 1984 May 23, 1984
Jun 13, 1984 Jun 27, 1984
Jul 11, 1984 Jul 25, 1984
Aug 8, 1984 None Scheduled
Sep 12, 1984 Sep 26, 1984
Oct 10, 1984 Oct 24, 1984
Nov 14, 1984 Nov 28, 1984
Dec 12, 1984 None Scheduled
Jan 9, 1985 Jan 23, 1985
Feb 13, 1985 Feb 27, 1985
r· ., ' _ JOARDS OF DIRECTORS
l
II
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AG.ENDA
MEETING OATE
FEBRUARY 8., 1984 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM.1 PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDIT.ION.1 .STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
( 2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda
(6) EACH DISTRICT
(7)
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following
minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered
by the Chairman:
District 1 -January 11, 1984, regular
District 2 -January 11, 1984, regular
District 3 -January 11, 1984, regular
·District 5 -January 11, 1984, regular
District 6 -January 11, 1984, regular
District 7 -January 11, 1984, regular
District 11 -January 11, 1984, regular
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint, -,
and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only ori'"ce 4
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See
page(s) "A" and "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self-Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
1/11/84
$314,830.09
80,701.11
62,679.28
3,487.47
78,278.20
18,001.27
67,409.62
19.70
30,903.64
6,149.56
816.73
2,981. 21
$666,257.88
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(q)
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
1/25/84
$219,204.20
267-,618.48
67,360.05
4,861.61
767.50
9 ,.355. 66
14,091.36
4,885.99
188.10
5,492.35
6,716.28
2,773.55
17.02
$603,332.15
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not
requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any
particular item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items.
All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action
approving·all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for
resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business •
. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent
calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state.their name,
address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the
consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the
consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on
the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
·~
' -..
11
2/08/84
( 9) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for Safety Platforms at Belt
Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107,
granting a time extension of 42 calendar days to the
contract with Belmont Engineering due to District-caused
delays at the job site. See page "C"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-12, accepting Safety
Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. PW-107, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "D"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-13, accepting Sludge and
Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. See page . "E" .
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-14, approving plans and
specifications for Installation of Four (4) pH and Four (4)
Conductivity Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks at Plant
No. 2, Job No. PW-118, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "F"
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-15, approving plans and
specifications for Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2,
Job No. PW-121, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "G"
(e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Six (6) 1/2-Ton Pickup
Trucks, Specification No. A-116, to GMC Truck & Coach in the
total amount of $45,900.12 including tax. See page "H"
(f) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) 4-Wheel Drive
Jeep, Specification No. A-117, to Brian Chuchua's Jeep, Inc.
in the amount of $8,904.00 including tax. See page "I"
(g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) 2-Ton Flat Bed
Truck, Specification No. A-118, to GMC Truck & Coach in the
amount of $14,860.14 including tax. See page "J"
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation to reject the low bid of Theodore Robins Ford as
it did not meet the engine specifications, and awarding purchase
of 3/4-Ton Cab & Chassis with Utility Type Service, Specification
No. A-119, to Jerry Goodwin Dodge, the second low bidder, in the
amount of $11,443.76 including tax. See page "K"
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and
issue ,a purchase order to Wyss, Inc., c/o Bessen & Associates,
in an ·'.amount not to exceed $41,000.00 plus tax and freight, for ' . purchase of 1300 Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers,
Specification No. E-144, for evaluation of improved suspended
solids and BOD removal efficiencies in a portion of the
secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1
-3-
(9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(j)
......
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and
issue a purchase order to Romac Supply Company for an amount not
to exceed $45,000.00 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Three
(3) 2000 KVA Standby Transformers, Specification No. E-145, for
use at the Foster Outfall Pumping Station located at Plant No. 2~
(k) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Influent Magnetic .
Replacement Flow Meters, Specification No. E-142, to Ponton
Industries, Inc. in the total amount of $119,022.00, plus tax and
(l)
(m)
(n)
delivery, as follows: See page "L"
DISTRICT(S) TRUNK LINE BID AMOUNT TOTAL SHARE OF COST
1 ·j\ Talbert ,,
·\ l
$12,520 l -$12,520.00
2 Santa Ana River 17 ,_880 2 -17,880.00
3, 11 & Joint Interplant 21,194 ( 3 -4,662.68
( 11 -847.76
(Joint -15,683.56
3 Miller-Holder 21,194 3 -21, 194_. 00
3 Bushard 21,194 3 -21,194.00
5 & 6 A & B Trunk 12,520 (5 -3,130.00
(6 -9,390.00
6 & 7 Airbase 12,520 (6 -11,894.00 v
(7 -626.00
TOTAL $119,022 $119,022.00
Consideration of motion authoJizing William N. Clarke, Districts'
Superintendent to attend meetings and conferences within the
State of California during the remainder of his term as
President-elect of the California Water Pollution Control
Association (CWPCA) and during his term as P~esident through
May 1985, with the approval of the General Manager; and
authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and
incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith
Consideration of motion authorizing Districts' Superintendent,
William N. Clarke to attend the Water Pollution Control
Federation Region 8 conference in Reno, Nevada, on February 23 &
24, 1984; and authorizing reimbursement for travel meals, lodging
and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated
January 11, 1984, from the City of Cypress supporting the City of
Fountain Valley in their opposition to construction of sludge
disposal facilities in the City of Fountain Valley
-4-
(9)
-i./Ul'.S/l'.S4
DISTRICT 3
(o) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Trench Reconstruction,
Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-2R, making
miscellaneous technical clarifications
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-18-3, to receive and file
bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for
Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract
DISTRICT 5
No. 3-21-2R, to Richardson & Le Bouef Company in the amount
of $213,699.00. See pages "M" and "N"
(p) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to plans
and specifications for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific
Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge _Pump ~tation to Dover
Drive, Contract No. 5-lSR (Rebid), authorizing an addition of
$9,988.00 to the contract with Russco Construction, Inc. for
installation of additional mechanical pipe supports and thrust
blocks and additional work required due to the incorrect location
of the existing force main on the Cal Trans as-built plans, and
granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for said additional
work and inclement weather. See page "O" ·
DISTRICT 7
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-19-7, ordering annexation of
.67 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of
Highcliff Drive and Newport Boulevard in unincorporated County
territory, proposed Annexation No. 119 -Roberts Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7. (Must also be annexed to the
7th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "P"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items removed from consent calendar,
..._;· if any
-s-
~/ UO/ 06*
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue Requests for
Proposals (RFP's) for Odor Containment/Treatment Facilities and
Operating Procedures Study
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to convene in closed session re salary adjustments,
pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to reconvene in reguladsession
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action, if any, on items considered in closed session
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(19) DISTRICT 5
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT 6 j'
Other business or communications or supplemental
1
agenda items, if a
1
1y
(22) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11
Consideration of actions relative to the Final Environmental Impact
Report on the Master Plan of Sewage Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3
and 11, as follows:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report summarizing
the Final EIR on the Master Plan of Sewage Collection for Districts
Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (Copy mailed to Directors on 1/26/84)
(b) Verbal report of environmental consultant, Michael Brandman
Associates re Final EIR
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments
received after public hearing on November 9, 1983 re Draft EIR
(included in Final EIR document)
(ITEM 23 continued on page 7)
-6-
-1 --, -•
(23) DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 (Continued)
(d) Discussion
(e) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final
Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Sewage Collection
for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11; and certify that said Final EIR has
been completed in compliance with the State And District guildelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended. (Copy mailed to Directors on 1/26/84)
(f) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-17, certifying Final
Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Sewage Collection
for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, making certain findings in
connection therewith, and adopting a statement of overriding
considerations (Copy mailed to Directors on 1/26/84)
(24) DISTRICT 3
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda ·items, if any
( 25) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 11
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRicr 2
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report relative to
negotiations for the acquisition of an easement over the Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1, in the vicinity between
Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway. See page "Qn
(b) Verbal report of General Counsel
(c) Consideration of action on General Counsel's recommendation, if
necessar¥
(29) DISTRICTS 2 & 7
(a) Receive and file interim report of the District 13 Steering Committee
(Copy enclosed with agenda material)
(b) Discussion
(c) Consideration of motion approving modification of the boundary of
proposed District No. 13 to exclude developed territory
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-16, approving proposed Orange County
Reorganization No. 65 -Formation of County Sanitation District No. 13
and Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7, and
directing that a proposal therefor be filed with the Local Agency
Formation Commission of Orange County. See page "R"
(30) DISTRICT 2
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
-7-
(31) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 7
Engineering report on the sewerage facility requirements for the
expanding development in the Irvine Business Complex area and possible
establishment of a separate zone and connection fees to finance any added
facilities required to serve this area.
(a)
(b)
Verbal report
Consideration of motion to receive and file Irvine Business Complex
Study submitted by Boyle Engineering Corporation, and refer to
Directors and staff for study and consideration at an adjourned
D.istr ict 7 meeting to be held February 15th. (Copy enclosed with
agenda material)
I
(33) DISTRICT 7
Other business or communications or supplemental agenda ltems, if any
(34) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:30 p.m., February 15, 1984
-a-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation D i stricts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date
February 8, 1984 -7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Te lephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
The follow i ng is a brief explanation of the more important ,
non -routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not othe rwi se self -explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed
with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the
last Joint Board meeting .
To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the
agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the
Manager 's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda
items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change
orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within
the contract budget or engineer 's estimate . Detailed change
orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid
tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award .
ALL DISTRICTS
No. 9(a): Approving Change Order No . 1 to Job No . PW-107 ,
Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamat i on Plant
No . l; and Acceptanc e of Job as Complete .
(1) Change Order No . 1 . Change Order No. 1 adds 42 calendar
days t o the contract time becaus e the Districts had to deny the
Contractor acc ess to the dewatering building on several occasio n s
due to ongoing operating requirements. There is no addition to
the contract cost associated with this time extension .
The· staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 1 .
(2) Closeout. The Contractor, Belmont Engineering , has
fulfill ed all contractual obligations within the specified time .
The staff recommends adop tion of the r esolution appeari ng on the
agenda, acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the
F ina l Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion
as required. The final contract pr ice is $32,156 .00 .
2/8/84
No . 9(b ): Ac cep tance of Job No. PW-108, Sludge and Digester
Gas Piping at Plant No. 2, as Complete .
The contractor, Kiewit Pacific Company, has fulfilled all
contractual obligations within th e specified time. The staff
recommends adoption of the resolutio n appearing on the ag e n d a
autho r izin g acceptance of t he work as comp l ete , execution of the
Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion
as required . The final contract price is $87,866. There were no
change orders on this job.
No. 9(c): Approval of Plan s an d Specifications for
Installation of Four (4) pH and Four (4) Conductivity Meters for
Plant No. 2, "C" Headworks Influent Trun ks , Job No . PW -118 .
The staff has completed plans and specifications to purchase
and install four pH and four conductivity meters to aid in the
monitoring of i ncoming flows and industrial waste discharges.
The instruments will help trace the source of pollutants when
large batch dumps are received at Plant No . 2. The meters , simi -
lar to those in use at Plant No . 1, will be installed in the four
incoming trunk lines that enter P l ant No . 2 at "C" Headwork s.
~pproval of the plans and specifications is recommended .
The engineer's estimate is $75 ,000.
No . 9(d): Approval of Plans and Specifications for Waste
Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No . PW -121.
The staff has completed plans and specifications for t h e
replacement o~ existing deteriorated waste gas b urners with
enclosed, high efficiency burners and flame arresters at Plant
No. 2 . This wil l help reduce odors, eliminate heat damage to
adjacent facilities and provide a safer working area.
Approval of the plans and specifications i s recommended .
The e ngineer's estimate is $55,000.
Nos. 9(e)(f)(g)&(h): Award Soecifications Nos . A-116 , 117 ,
118, 119 for Vehicles.
On January 24 , 1984 bids were recei v ed for the purchase of
nine vehicles. Six of the vehicles are mid -size pick -up trucks
and the remaining three are utilized for spec i alized Districts
functio n s as follows:
-2 -
Vehicle
1 /2 Ton Pick-Up
Truck
1 /2 Ton Pick-Up
Truck
1 /2 Ton Pick -Up
Truck
(3) 1 /2 Ton Pick-Up
Trucks
4 -Wheel Drive Jeep
2 Ton Flat Bed
3/4 Ton Service
Truck
Use
Warehouse
Laboratory
Resources
Management
Center
Industrial
waste
Laboratory
Trunk Line
Cleaning
Instrument
Repair
2 /8/84
New /Replacement
Replaces 1972 Van
Replaces 1973 Pick-Up
~ew . Needed for operational
monitoring & research pro -
jects in the Plants
New vehicles to be used for
increased industrial waste
monitoring
Replaces 1978 jeep . Jeeps
used for beach monitoring on
shorter year life cycle due
to wear caused by salt/sand
Replaces 1973 Flat Bed
Replaces 1969 Ford Pick -Up
Complete bid tabulations are attached to this agenda . Staff
r ecorrunen ds award to the low bidder for each specification as follows :
Agenda
Item No. Spec.No.
9(e) A-116
9 ( f) A-117
9(g) A-118
9 ( h) A-119
For
S ix 1 /2 Ton
Pick -Up Trucks
One 4 -Wheel
Jeep
One 2-Ton Flat
Bed Truck
On e 3 /4 Ton Cab
& Chassis with
Utility type
Service Body
Net Bid Amount
Vendor Including Taxes
GMC Truck & Coach $45,900.12
Br ian Chuchua 's
Jeep, Inc. 8 ,904 .00 *
GMC Truck & Coach 14 ,860.14
Jerry Goodwin
Dodge
TOTAL:
11 ,443.76 **
$81 ,1 08 .02
* Trade in allowance of $1,250 for old jeep is being rejected as low
blue book on the 1978 jeep is $3,400. Purchasing Dept . will attempt to
sell it outright at a higher price .
**Low bidder did not meet the engine specifications. Therefore,
recorrunendation is made to reject the $11 ,363 .20 low bid of Theodore
Robins Ford as not complying with engine specifications and award to
Jerry Goodwin Dodge, the second low bidder in the amount of
$11 ,443 .76.
-3-
2/8/84
No. 9(i): Authority to Negotiate & Issue Purchase Order for
Medium Bubble Diffusers to Increase Treatment Efficiency
In January 1978 the staff began operating the 46-MGD activa-
ted sludge facilities at Treatment Plant No . 1. These facilities
were constructed with conventional coarse air bubble diffusers .
Since the Plant has been in operation, the staff has found that
the facility h as the hydraulic and solids handling capabilites ~)
treat more than the 46 -MGD for which it was designed, however, it
is limited by the present design capabilities of t h e air dif-
fusion system.
Districts' personnel have been investigating other diffusion
systems in an attempt to alleviate this restriction and allow the
Plant to operate at a higher capacity. The Wyss Flex -A-Tube , a
medium bubble diffuser, appears to have a 25 % more efficient air
transfer, as well as eas y installation and a histor y of low main -
tenance r e quirements. This can potentiall y increase our second-
ary treatment capability by 25% (10 MGD ) at Plant No. 1 . This
will increase our overall BOD and suspended solids removal
efficiencies and help improve our ability to meet our
30l (h)/NPDES permit limitations .
In order to prove the effectiveness of the medium bubble
diffuser, the staff is recommending that 130 0 u nits be purchased
for installation in one of the eight aeration basins at Plant
No . 1 . Because the equipment is proprietar y , t h e staff is
requesting authority to negotiate with Wyss, Inc. and its local
representative, Bessen & Associates, and issue a purchase order
to Wyss, Inc . c /o Sessin & Associates for 13 0 0 Wyss F lex-A-Tube
diffusers for an amount not to exceed $41,000 plus tax and
freight. The d i ffusers wi l l be installed b y Districts' personnel
early this spring in conjunction with our rou ti n e mai n tenance
program.
No . 9(j ): Authorizing Staff to Negotiate Purc h ase of Standby
Electrical Equipmen t for Foster Outfall Pumping Station
The Foster Outfal l Pumping Station, located at Plant No. 2 ,
was constructed in 1964 and is the largest of t h e Districts ' two
outfall pumping plants. This station is eq u ipped with six large
pumps , two of which are engine dri v en (1200 h p eac h ) and four of
which are electrical mo tor driven (1000 hp eac h).
Two things have occurred recently which made the Districts '
staff uneas y abo u t the reliability of this station. F irst, we
have experienced failures of each of the engine drives . The
first engine (No. 9) ws repaired last fall &nd is now back in
-4-
;
2 /8/84
service, at a cost of approx ima tely $190 ,000. The second engine
(No . 10) is presently undergoing repair by the engine manufac -
turer (authorized at the January Board meeting) at an estimated
cost of $165 ,000 . It is expected to be out of service between
three and four months . This severely limits the pumping capabi-
lity by engine driven units.
Our second concern is the large 5,000 KVA transformer that
supplies energy to the four electric motor driven units . This
transformer has shown evidence of rust and corrosion which could
lead to a complete failure of the unit . Should this occur it
would prevent running of any of the four 1000 hp electric driven
pumps. When coupled with the loss of one 1200 hp engine driven
pump down for repairs , we would be unable to pump all of our
treated effluent through the 120" outfall which could require the
use of both emergency discharge points , the old 78" outfall and
the overflow to the Santa Ana River . It could also cause
flooding within the Plant itself .
To alleviate th is situation, staff proposes to buy standby
transformers and install them at the Foster Station , after wh ich
we will be able to remove the ex i sting transformer from service
and evaluate the extent of the rust and corrosion deterioration
and make the necessary repairs.
We have located three used 2 ,000 KVA single phase 12 ,000 volt
reducing to 2,400 volt transformers which would provide suf -
ficient transformer capacity . These can be purchased for $45,000
plus tax and delivery and will carry a six -month warranty
(to purchase these units new the cost would be $80 ,000). After
the existing transformer is repaired these three units will serv e
as standby capacity for this critical outfall pumping station
until such time as the proposed new ocean outfall pumping plant
is constructed 5 to 6 years from now. After that, the units may
be utilized in the Districts' facilities by reconnecting 12,000
volt to 4 ,1 60 volt delta , or they may be sold as surplus equip-
ment . An option would be to r ent the tran s formers during the
period of evaluation and repair, estimated to take six months, at
a cost of $6 ,000 per month fo r a total of $36,00 0 . However,
staff believes that the additional $9,000 to buy the transformers
would be a wise expenditure in that it would provide u s with
back -up equipment until the new Booster Station is completed.
we are requesting author ity to award a purchase order to
Rornac Supply Company of Commerce, California for the three used
transformers for a total price of $45 ,000 , plus tax and delivery
charges.
-5-
·-
2/8/84
No. 9(k): Award Specification No . E-142, Distr icts' Influent
Magnetic Replacement Flow Meters
On January 24, 1984 bids were received to furnis h seven
magnetic flow meters to monitor the influent from trunk sewers in
Districts 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 and 11. The purchase of th ese meters
was approved by the Boards of Directors at the November 29 , 1983
adjourned Regular meeting pursuant to a Staff Repo r t on District
Influent Flow meters. They are n eeded to comply w ith require -
ments of the Environmental Protection Agency as a condition of
t he Di stricts' proposed 30l(h)/NPDES permit.
Three bids were received ranging
mitted by Ponton Industries, Inc . of
of $134,506, exclus i ve of sales tax.
down by District:
Trunk Line
Talbert
Santa Ana River
Interplant
Miller-Holder
Bushard
A & B Trunk
Airbase
Vendor
Pon ton
Industries, Inc .
II
II
II
II
II
II
from a low of $119,022 s ub-
Santa Fe Springs, to a high
Th e following is a break -
Low Bid Shared Cost
Dist . Arnoun t *
$12,520 1 $12 ,520 .00
$17 ,880 2 $17 ,880 .00
3 $ 4,662 .68
11 $ 847 .76
$21,1 94 Joint $15 ,683.56
$21,194 3 $21,194 .00
$21,194 3 $21 ,194.00
5 $ 3 ,130 .00
$12 ,520 6 $ 9,390 .00
6 $11,894 .00
$12 ,520 7 $ 626 .00
TOTAL : $119,022.00
* Appl ic able sales tax and delivery charges to be added by vendor .
A Complete bid tabulation is incl uded with the a genda attachments.
Staff recommends award to the low bidder, Ponton Industries , Inc. for
their low bid amount of $119 ,022 plus applicable sales tax and
delivery charges . Delivery time 112 days after issuance of
purchase order .
-6-
No. 9(1) & (m): Author i ty for Travel for Districts'
Superintendent for Meeting Attendance in Capacity as CWPCA
President -Elect and President
2 /8/84
Mr. William N. Cl arke, Sr ., the Districts' Superintendent is
the President-elect of the California Water Pollution Control
Association and will assume off i ce as Pre s ident in May , 1984 for
a term of one year . In his officia l capacity Mr . Clarke will
have occasion to attend meetings and conferences both within and
outside of California.
I am recommending that I be given authority to authorize
Mr . Clarke to attend those meetings and conferences through
May, 1985 , within the State of Califo r nia that I deem
appropriate , as well as authorization for expense reimbursement
in accordance with established policy.
Any recommended travel outside of California during
Mr. Clarke's term of office will be submitted separately to
the Boards of Directors for authorization. Item No. 9(m)
appearing on the agenda requests authorization for Mr. Clarke to
attend the Water Pollution Control Federation Region 8 conference
in Reno , Nevada, February 22 -23, 1984, and reimbursement of
associated travel expenses. I recommend approval.
No. 9(n): Recei v e and File Letter from City of Cypress Re
Sludge Disposal Facilities
The City of Cypress has submitted a letter supporting the
City of Fountain Valley 's opposition to construction of sludge
disposal facil i ties in the City of Fountain Valley . The action
appearing on the agenda is to receive and file this letter.
DISTRICT NO. 3
No . 9(o): Approval of Addendum *l to Plans and Specifications
and Award of Contract for Trench Reconstruction , Los Alamitos
Boulevard , Contract No. 3 -21-2R
I n December 1983 the Boards approved plans and specifications
for the rehabilitation of Los Alamitos £lvd. where we have
experienced recurring trench settlement . The area is over a por-
tion of the Westside Relief Interceptor constructed in 1975. The
project will remove unstable soil and recompact it over the entire
trench between Rossmoor Way and Katella Blvd.
There are two actions appearing on your agenda:
-7-
2/8/84
(1) Approva l of Addendum No. 1. This addendum clarifies the
plans and specifications regarding the slurry required for the
job.
(2) Award of Contract. Twelve (12) b i ds were received
ranging from a low of $213,699.00 submitted by Richardson &
LeBouef of Santa Ana to a high of $311,720.40. The engineer's
estimate was $225,000.00.
The staff recorrunends approval of Addendum No. 1 and award of
the contract to Richardson & LeBouef for its low bid amount of
$213,699.00 .
DISTRICT NO. 5
No. 9(p): Approve Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation and
Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer from Bay Bridge
Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract 5-18R (Rebid )
Change Order No. 2 adds $9 ,988 to the contract for three
items of work and a twelve -day time extension for inclement
weather and the additional work. The work includes installation
of thr ee mechanical pipe supports at the Dover Drive vault and
three concrete block supports and two thrust blocks at the Bay
Bridge Pump Station, and mod i fications necessary due to incorrect
location of the existing force main on the CalTrans as-built
plans. The twelve days additional time is allowed for 8 days of
inclement weather and 4 days to perform the change order work .
The staff recorrunends approval of Change Order No . 2 adding
$9 ,988 for a revised contract price of $849,563.85 and a 12
calendar day time extension.
DISTRICT NO. 7
No. 9 (q): Ordering Annexation No. 119 , Roberts Annexation
This .67 -acre annexation is for a single family residence in
the vicinity of Highcliff Drive and Newport Avenue in unincor-
porated County territory . The local sewering agency will be the
7th Sewer Maintenance District.
All applicable acreage and processing fees have been paid
pursuant to the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County
of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties. A one-
time s e rv i ce fee f or each lot in lieu of the District receiving a
tax allocation on the property has also been paid.
The staff recorrunends that Annexation No. 119, Roberts
Annexation be ordered.
-8-
2/8/84
ALL DISTRICTS
Nos. 11 and 12: Report of the Exec utive Committ ee
The Committee met o n Octob er 26th and enclosed for Board mem -
bers is a wr i tten report of its discussions and recommended
actions for co nsiderat ion by the Boards.
Nos. 13, 14 and 15: Clo sed Ses sion
The Boards will con vene in closed session to meet with mana -
gement r epr esentatives pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6 .
DIS TRICTS NOS . 2 , 3 and 11
No. 23: Rece i ve , File an d C e r tify Final EIR for Master P lan
of Sewage Colle ction, Distr icts 2, 3 and 11
On January 26 , 1984 a Staff Report and Summary of The Final
EIR was mailed to the Directors of Distr icts 2 , 3 and 11. ·The
Staff Report out lines t he comments received on the Draft EIR and
the Districts' responses included i n the Final EIR prepared by
Michael Brandman Associates, Inc ., the Districts ' env ironme nt al
consultant. Al so enclosed with the Repo r t was a copy of t h e
final EIR and a copy of proposed Resolution No. 84-17 , making
find in gs and adopting statement of overriding considerations.
The consultant will present a verba l report to the Directors
at the me et ing. The actions appearing on your agenda are to
r eceive and f ile t he Staff Report and commen ts submitted on t h e
Draft EIR, a nd to recei ve , file and certify the Final EIR and
approve Resolution No . 84 -1 7 to comply with CEQA requirements .
If any Director has a question or wishes additional copies of
the Draft EIR , Final EIR or Resolution No . 84-17, please call Tom
Dawes or Hilary Baker at 54 0-2 910 .
DISTRICT NO . 2
No . 28 : Acquisition of Easement for Santa Ana Riv er
Interceptor Sewer Between Garden Grove Boulevard and Garden Grove
Freeway
Attached to the agenda material is a se parate staff report
regarding the proposed acquisitio n of an e as e ment fo r the Santa
Ana River Interceptor between Garden Grove Boulevard and Garden
Grove Freeway.
-9-
DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 7
No. 29 : Items Regarding Proposed Formation of
9istrict No . 13
2/8/84
Enclosed with the agenda material is a separate interim
report of the District No. 13 Steering Committee regarding a
recommended modification of the proposed boundary. The Committee
will review its recommendation at the meeting Wednesday evening.
Also incl uded with this item is adoption of Resolution
No. 84 -16 which will enable initiation of District 13 formation
proceedings at LAFC .
DISTRICT NO. 7
No. 32: Rece i ve , File and Take Under Study Report Relative
to Sewerage Facility Reauirements for Serving the Expanding
Irvine Business Complex Area for Consideration at an Adjou rned
Meeting February 15, 1984
Last month the Board authorized issuance of a purchase order
to Boyle Engineering to conduct a study to determine i f addi-
tional sewering facilities will be needed to serve the expand ing
Irvine Business Complex around the airport and the connection
fees required to finance their construction. The engineer has
completed the study which is enclosed with the agenda .
A brief verbal summary of the report conclusions will be pre-
sented to the Directors at the meeting, after which it is recom-
~ended that the report be ~eceived , filed , taken under study and
set for consideration at an adjourned meeting on February 15, 1984.
FAH :JWS:j b
-10-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
January 30, 1984
COUNT Y SAN ITAT ION DISTRICTS
of Q RAN GE C OUN TY, C ALIFO RNIA
P.0 .BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVEN UE
FOUN TA IN VAL LEY, CALI FOR N IA 92708
(7 14) 540-291 0
(714) 962-2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
January 25, 1983
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:
Present :
Donald A. Holt, Jr., Joint Chairman
Richard B. Edgar, Vice Joint Chairman
Robert Hanson
Henr y Wedaa
Bruce Finlayson
Evelyn Hart
James Wahner
Don Smith
Ruth Bailey
Supervisor Roger Stanton
Absent:
Convene:
Adjourn:
None
5:30 p.m.
7 :15 p.m.
Others present:
Director John Thomas
Director Bill Vardoulis
Thomas L. Woodruff, General
Counsel
Staff Present:
Fred A. Harper, General
Manager
J . Wa yn e Sylv ester,
Assistant General Manager
William H. Butler, Director
of Finance
Thomas M. Da wes, Deputy
Chief Engineer
1. Status Report on Dist r ict No. 13 Formation.
The Joint Chairman presented a status repo rt on t he
activities of the Proposed District No. 13 Steering Committee,
which met on January 18th to review progress made toward
formation of the new District. He reported t h at t h e Steering
Committee had considered and approved a modi f ication t o t h e
orig i nal ·b oundaries of the proposed District wh ere by all
presentl y inhabited areas originally proposed to become part o f
the new Distr ict upon its formation would be annexed to District
No. 2 or be placed in District No. 13 at a later date if other
financing of user fees cannot be obtained. The Steering
Committee's primar y reason for taking t h is action was t o expedite
the approval process for the proposed District by including onl y
uninhabited areas within its boundaries during formation.
E.C.
1/25/84
Following a discussion regarding financing for the proposed
District, the Joint Chairman and Director Wedaa advised the
Executive Committee that they intended to meet with members of
the Board of Supervisors to update them of the progress made to
date and to seek support for use of SDAF funds to provide for
financing of District No. 13 operations and maintenance costs
during its first year of formation. The Executive Committee then
recommended that a status report be presented to the Boards of
Directors of Districts Nos. 2 and 7 at the upcoming February 8th
meeting of the Joint Boards.
2. RFP for Odor Containment/Treatment Facilities and
Operating Procedures Study.
One of the real everyday challenges of operating wastewater
plants is dealing with odors that are associated with sewage
processing. The Districts' staff has been striving for an
odor-free operation. During the past few years, improved odor
treatment facilities costing $1,923,000 have been constructed.
The estimated annual operating cost for labor, materials and
chemicals for odor treatment in 1983-84 is $1,879,000. These
costs (see enclosed summary) are primarily for treating foul air
from the incoming trunk sewers, the primary settling basins, the
sludge dewatering facilities and certain enclosed facilities.
Because of the substantial annual costs involved and the
need for further improvements, the Districts' staff recommends
that an RFP be issued to outside consultants specializing in odor
control to conduct an independent study of the Districts' current
odor treatment facilities and operating procedures. The selected
consultant would ma k e recommend~tions for additional facilities
and/or new operating procedures to further reduce odors toward
the goal of an odor-free operation.
The Committee concurs with staff's recommendation to issue
RFP's for an independent study of the Districts' odor containment
and treatment facilities and operating procedures.
3 . Status Report on Sludge Disposal Alternatives.
The General Manager presented a status report to the
Committee updating them on the actions taken by the staff since
the November 29, 1983 special meeting of the Boards to consider
alternatives to achieve short-term and long-term compliance with
EPA's residual solids management (sludge disposal ) requirements.
The Districts are continuing to take digested, dewatered
sludge to the County's Coyote Can y on landfill for disposal by
mixing the sludge with municipal solid waste. This disposal
method will continue until the landfill closes or until the
-2-
E.C.
1/25/84
Districts award a contract to a private company for reuse/
disposal. The staff is actively evaluating several other avenues
to achieve long-term compliance with the EPA requirements,
including entering into discussions with the County of Orange
regarding use of other County landfill sites for disposal,
issuance of RFP's to the private sector for long-term, offsite
reuse/disposal services, ana discussions with EPA/SWRCB personnel
regarding review of sites other than Fountain Valley and
Huntington Beach for location of mechanical composting and
co-combustion facilities.
Following considerable discussion regarding the
implementability of the alternatives presently under review, the
Committee directed the staff to present the status report
(attached) to the Joint Boards at the February 8th meeting.
4. Status Report on Reorganization of the Sanitation
Districts.
Director Don Smith reported on the actions of the Special
Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts,
which met prior to the Executive Committee meeting. The
..._, Reorganization Committee met to review the impact of the Boards'
voluntary policy limiting its member agencies to a single
Director to represent all Districts of which the agency is a
member. The policy, which became effective last August, has been
in effect for six months.
The Reorganization Comm i ttee recommended to the Executive
Committee that the Boards encourage all members of the Board of
Supervisors to attend Board meetings and participate in
Districts' activities to allow for more effective representation
of the large constituencies represented by each of the
Supervisors. Since the policy outli~ed in Resolution No. 83-34
is permissive in allowing multiple representation if desired by
any given agency, more than one Supervisor can attend under this
policy, although the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors has
directed only one Supervisor to serve on the Joint Boards since
implementation of this policy. Supervisor Stanton is presently
the only active Supervisor on the Districts' Boards of Directors.
The Executive Committee recommends that Resolution No.
83-34, Urging Each Member Agency to Have a Single Director
Represent All Districts of Which the Agency is a Member, stand as
approved, and further recommends that the Joint Chairman be
directed to write a letter encouraging all the Supervisors to
attend the Districts' meetings and participate in Districts'
Committee activities to provide more representation for the large
County constituency.
-3-
5. Sewage Spill in the Bolsa Chica Wetlands.
E.C.
1/25/84
Various news agencies reported that a sewage spill had
occurred in the vicinity of the Bolsa Chica wetlands on Tuesday,
January 24th.
The spill did not originate from any Districts' lines or
pump stations, although it appears that it happened about the
same time that a power outage occurred in the Huntington Harbour
area. This same outage also affected the Districts' Edinger pump
station, but the power to this station was quickly restored
without problems.
6. Cancellation of the Districts' February 10th NPDES/30l(h)
Waiver Hearing.
On Monday, January 23rd, the General Manager received a
phone call from the Executive Officer of the Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control Board advising that the scheduled joint
EPA/Regional Board Hearing on February 10, 1984 for the
Districts' NPDES permit/30l(h) waiver had been cancelled. Mr.
Anderson indicated that the reason for delay was that EPA Region
IX staff did not agree with the ocean monitoring requirements
published by the Regional Board and EPA requested the Regional
Board to cancel the hearing until the differences between the two
regulatory agencies could be resolved. Since the joint hearing
was the only item on the meeting agenda, the Regional Board chose
to cancel the meeting altogether .
. It appears that the EPA ocean monitoring program, if
incorporated into the Districts' NPDES permit requirements, could
cost the Districts more than $2 million annually, whereas the
Regional Board staff program requirements would identify the
impacts of the Districts' discharge to the ocean at a cost of
$700,000 per year. When this matter is resolved, a new hearing
date will be set for sometime in April by the Regional Board and
EPA.
The Executive Committee directed the Joint Chairman to
contact Ms. Judith Ayres, who was recently appoint ed the EPA
Region IX Administrator, to set up an appointment in the
immediate fut ure to address the issue of the 30l(h) waiver and
seek a formal commitment for prompt action o n our application.
The Committee further directed the staff to prepare a letter to
William Ruc kelhaus, EPA Administrator, as well as o ur
Congressional representatives and other senior Administration
officials to advise them of the delays the Districts have
exper ie nced in receiving action o n our waiver since the President
signed the enabling legislation on December 27, 1977, more than
six years ago. -4-
..
E.C.
1 /25/84
7. Consideration of Management and Department Head
Salaries.
The Committee convened in closed session to discuss
management and department head salary adjustments with the
General Manager. At the Regular Joint Meeting on December 14th
the Boards declared their intent to make any adjustments
retroactive to January 1, 1984. The Committee's recommendation
will be discussed in closed session at February's Joint Board
Meeting.
8. Change of February Executive Committee Meeting Date.
The Committee approved a change in the regular February
Executive Committee Meeting from February 22nd to February 29th
at the request of the Joint Chairman.
-5-
-"-"'
.... January 25, ·1984
ODOR CONTROL COST SUMMARY
RECENT ODOR CONTROL FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
COST
Additional Chlorination Facilities $ 575,600
Foul Air Scrubbers at Plant 2 894,600
Digester Improvements 215,100
Hydrogen Peroxide Facilities 123,700
Dewatering Building Improvements 43,200
Other Miscellaneous Improvements 70,800
$ 1,923,000
ANNUAL ODOR CONTROL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
(Exclusive of Depreciation)
Plants 1 and 2 Combined
Odor Control Equipment Maintenance
Odor Control Operations
Salaries & Misc.
Sodium Hydroxide
Chlorine
Hydrogen Peroxide
Ferric Chloride
Ferrous Chloride Testing
Power
Sulfide Testing
Potassium Permanganate (Dewatering)
TOTAL
Actual
1982-1983
147,963
50,931
32,463
491,278
353,134
-o-
74, 004
244,482
94,320
143,569
$1,632,144
Projected
1983-1984
167,079
141,159
163,125
764,241
57,027
235,866
-o-
337, 482
2,238
10,797
$1,879,014
STATUS REPORT
ON
SLUDGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES
January 25, 1984
Following the November 29 special meeting of the Boards, a letter
was sent to the Director of the Water Management Division, Region IX,
EPA, San Francisco indicating the Joint Boards' actions relative to
EPA's directive of October 31, 1983. They had requested Board com-
mitment for short term and long term compliance with residual solids
management (sludge disposal), as well as a time table for achieving
verifiable flow metering at the District's two treatment plants.
Short Term Compliance
The Districts are continuing to take digested dewatered sludge,
averaging 22!% solids, to the County's Coyote Canyon landfill for
direct incorporation with municipal solid waste with a minimum of a
10:1 mix. We expect this activity to continue until the landfill
ceases operation or until the Districts award a contract to a private
company for reuse/disposal.
Long Term Compliance
The Districts' staff has initiated discussions with personnel of the
County General Services Administration-Waste Management Program.
We have suggested that one of the more viable alternatives would be a
base program of the incorporation of sludge with municipal waste at
several County landfills. If each landfill in the County accepts 6-10
deliveries each day, the blending with ~he solid waste would be
20-30:1 instead of the current 10:1. This would mitigate any real or
perceived leachate problems.
We have been advised that because of litigation between the City o~
Irvine and County of Orange concerning the proposed development of Bee
Canyon north of the El Toro Marine Base as a new landfill, the City
and County are negotiating a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). One
paragraph of the MOU concerns the disposal of sludge at the proposed
landfill. The County's version would restrict the delivering of
sludge to the landfill until public hearings were held and an
Environmental Impact Report CEIR) was approved by the County Supervi-
sors, while the City has proposed an outright ban of sludge ever being
disposed of at the landfill.
Since the Bee Canyon landfill will probably receive large volumes of
municipal waste following the closure of the Coyote Canyon landfill,
1
the Districts would be hard-pressed to incorporate our dewatered
sludge at the other landfills because of the 10:1 mix requirement.
jj
The Districts' staff estimates that if there is a total prohibition of
sludge at Bee Canyon, the operating cost for the Districts' operations
could increase 1 to 4! million dollars per year. The incorporation of
dewatered sludge with municipal waste is a common and proven practice
throughout the United States. Our current operation at Coyote Canyon
is very satisfactory and to our knowledge has no detrimental effects.
The EPA and State have indicated that grants could be available for
landfill improvements such as leachate control systems & access roads
funded in proportion to the volume of sludge handled. In,~ddition,
there ha~ been substantial discussion concerning co-combustion at
several other sites. The State Board staff is recommending that we
consider potential sites other than Fountain Valley and Huntington
Beach for mechanical composting and co-combustion facilities.
RFP: Off-Site/Re-Use Disposal
During December and January advertisements were placed in newspapers
and trade journals with regional and national circulation. To date,.
98 companies have responded. On January 9 a half-day conference was
held with interested vendors to review the RFP, submit questions and
tour the Districts' dewatering facilities at both treatment plants.
Because of the continuing interest, an additional conference has been
scheduled for February 16. The sludge reuse/disposal proposals are
due March 30. Considerable use has been made of the LA/OMA study
I
11
I
material which we have placed in the purchasing off ice for review by ~
interested parties. To say the least, this concept has aroused
national interest.
Facilitie~ Plan and Grant-Funded EIS/EIR Study of Alternatives for the
Districts' Ultimate Solids Management Program
On December 2 your Manager wrote to EPA and the State asking for
direction concerning further consideration of mechanical composting
and co-combustion at either of our two treatment sites. We have been
advised that the Chief of the Division of Water Quality and
Manager/Clean Water Grant Program has prepared a letter advising that
they consider it premature to close out further consideration of these
alternatives at this time. They are recommending that we consider
potential sites other than Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach for
these proposed facilities and include these options as we further
proceed with the alternative analysis. With regard to Bee Canyon,they
believe it appears to be one of the more technically feasible sites
for long term solution of disposal of sludge and they are requesting
that we keep this option conceptually open and continue to work toward
its implementability.
2
®
BDLJ/e EnoineerinQ Carparatian
1501 Quail Streu•
P 0 . Box 3030
Newport Beach, California 92658-0469
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 7
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
10844 Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
consultlnc enclneers / architects
7 14 I 752-0505
Tele x 68-5561
February 1 , 1984
Irvine/Newport Beach Business Complex Study
The Con sol idated Master Pl an of Trunk Sewer Fae il it ies (adopted
in December 1982 ) identified the required trunk and subtrunk
sewer facilities to serve the District, based on the current and
projected land use planning at that time. Since adopting the
master plan development planning details in the Irvine/Newport ·
Beach Business Center Complex (I/NBBC) have changed, yielding
significantly greater densities for individual parcels than ~he
average for the area as a whole. The I/NBBC study area, as shown
on Fi gu re 1, extends north of the San Diego Freeway to Barranca
Road and south to Bristol Street and is bounded by the Newport
Freeway on the west and the San Diego Creek Channel on the east .
Because of this density shift, the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer h as
been realigned and several subtrunks will need additi o r.al
capacity to accommodate the various developments curre n tly
identified by the respective planning juri sdic tions. Th ese
rev1s1ons and additions woul d r esult in construction costs
greater than tho se presented in the mas te r plan adopted in
December 1982.
The District is c onsidering establishing a special zone with
boundaries delineated in Figure 1 and setting a connection fee to
finance these additional facilities. This stud y identifies th e
additional facilities requ i red and provides estimated
construction costs.
Land Us e
Land use within the I/NBBC is classified industrial/commercial
with four large hotels in operation, two major hotels under
construction , and five other s proposed for construction. The
density varies somewhat from north to so uth with t h e most intense
density centered south of the San Diego Fr eew3y ,
Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-February 1, 1984
The recent Airport Relief Trunk Sewer route investigation
identified the major proposed developments located south of the
San Diego Freeway and within the Main Street Subtrunk's service
a r e a • The C i t y o f I r v i n e p r o v i d e d d e· t a i 1 s o f s p e c i f i c
developments for the remaining portion I/NBBC north of the San
Diego Freeway.
In analyzing the data received from the City, the proposed
developments within the area north of the Main Street Subtrunk
are not expected to exceed the average density of those
developments projected in the master plan. In the entire study
zone, the new developments current! y proposed are comprised
mainly of office buildings and hotels that would add to the area:
Office Buildings
Hotels (3,652 rooms)
Total
Projected Flows
15,000,000 square feet
2,557,000 square feet
17,557,000 square feet
To assess the impact of the proposed increased development
densities, the average flow for each development proposal was·
projected and compared with flows allowed in the master plan for
the same parcel. When the updated average flow was greater than
the master .Pl an aver age flow contribution for the respective
parcel the trunk system was re-analyzed for adequate capacity
using the methodology and peak-to-average relationship outlined
in the master plan report was used.
The analysis showed that the Mc Gaw Subtrunk tr ib.utary area
serving the northerly portion of the study area was adequate in
capacity and that the development densities proposed within this
tributary area do not contribute additional flow. The analysis
presented in our November 1, 1983 report for the Airport Relief
Trunk route investigation identified that the updated projected
flows for the tributary area of the Main Street Subtrunk, north
of San Diego Freeway, exceeds the master plan tributary flow.
In addition, the route investigation of the Airport Relief Trunk
Sewer determined that due to the distribution of the newly
proposed high intensity developments south of the San Diego
Freeway, a revised Airport Relief Trunk alignment would maximize
use of the existing trunk and subtrunk system. However, three
additional existing subtrunks will still require relief due to
the developments proposed at their upstream ends. These are the
Main Street Subtrunk, the Michelson Subtrunk, and Campus Drive
Subtrunk east of Von Karman Avenue. The overall projected
average flow increase from the I/NBBC study area over and above
the master plan flo~ is 1.4 mgd bringing the total to 15.4 mgd.
Mr. Fred A. Harper -3-February 1, 1984
Additional Required Facilities
The additional required facilities to serve the Irvine/Newport
Beach Business Complex include:
1. Revised Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Alignment
As discussed in the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Route
Investigation, the revised alignment would serve the
District with greater flexibility. Not only would the
alignment be located closer to the intense development
densities, but it would maximize use of existing.
subtrunk facilities. The revised Airport Relief Trunk
would include the relocation of the South Irvine Lift
Station and Force Main.
2. Main Street Relief Subtrunk
As mentioned in the previous section, the upper reach
of the existing Main Street Subtrunk would be taxed
because of the increased development in the vicinity·
of the Jamboree Boulevard and Main Street
intersection. To provide the required relief of the
existing subtrunk, a 21-inch sewer relief trunk is
recommended to parallel the existing subtrunk from
Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard. This relief
trunk would be an additional facility over and above
the adopted master plan.
3. Campus Relief Subtrunk
The existing Campus Subtrunk's capacity is inadequate
to serve the increased development areas east of
Jamboree Boulevard along Campus Drive. A 15-inch
relief trunk would be required to serve the
intensified area and-would extend from Von Karman to
Jamboree Boulevard in Campus Drive. The Campus Relief
Trunk is also an additional facility over and above
the master plan.
4. Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main
In view of the intense development pl ans projected
east of Von Karman and south of Michelson Drive, the
existing gravity sewer and force main in Michelson
Drive (from Von Karman and south of Michelson Drive
Pumping St at ion) w i 11 be deficient in capacity •
Therefore, a 21-inch gravity relief trunk and 10-inch
force will be required to provide adequate relief of
the existing sewer facilities, as shown on Figure 1. ·
These facilities are also additional facilities, over
and above the master plan.
Mr. Fred A. Harper -4-February 1, 1984
5. McGaw Subtrunk
As stated in the previous section, the McGaw Subtrunk
was not affected by the development densities proposed
w i th in i t s t r i but a r y are as • Therefore , · the mast er
plan improvements are adequate.
6. South Irvine Lift Station
Recent increases within the I/NBBC would require
up-sizing the South Irvine Lift Station to handle the
additional 1.4 mgd flow, over and above the master;
plan. In addition, with the new alignment of the
Airport Relief Trunk, the Land Road Pumping Station
will be consolidated with the South Irvine Lift
Station for more efficient operation. Consolidation·
of the Lane Road Pumping Station with the South Irvine
Lift Station will yield a 15.4 mgd flow to the South.
Irvine,Lift Station.
7. Pumping Station Modifications
As stated in the master pl an , four existing pump in g
stations (Lane Road, Michelson Drive, McGaw, and
MacArthur) would require minor modifications to serve
the I/NBBC. With the recent adoption of the revised
Airport Relief ·Trunk Sewer alignment and relocation of
the South Irvine Lift Station, the Lane Road Pumping
Station will be taken out of service. Since the flows
to the McGaw Lift Station are the same as projected
for the master plan, the modifications recommended in
the master plan remain the same. Flows to the
Michelson Drive and MacArthur Pumping Stations have
increased slightly, but· the modifications recommended
in the master plan are capable of handling the
increased flow.
Estimated Construction Cost
Due to the addition of new facilities and avoided costs of the
deleted facilities, a direct comparison of additional costs can
not be related to the master plan facilities on a facility by
facility basis. Estimated construction costs of all facilities
to serve the study area with the current proposed land use
conditions are compared with original master plan facility costs
in Table 1.
The recently amended Airport Relief Trunk route voided the costs
of the following master plan facilities:
1. Main Street Relief Subtrunk --Lane Road Pump Station
to MacArthur Boulevard
2. South Irvi~e Relief Subtrunk
Mr. Fred A. Harper -5-February 1, 1984
3. Lane Road Pumping Station Modifications
However, the cost of the revised Airport Relief Trunk increased
by. two pipe sizes, with the newly proposed Main Street Relief
Subtrunk, Campus Relief Subtrunk, and the Michelson Relief
Subtrunk and Force Main will result in a net additional
construction cost of $1 ,290,000 •
. Should you or your staff wish to review this report in further
detail, we are available at your convenience.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
c~'!~<l~
Regional Vice President
encl.
kh
OC-C07-135-00
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF TRUNK SEWER
FACILITIES TO SERVE THE IRVINE/NEWPORT BEACH BUSINESS COMPLEX
FACILITY
1. Airport Relief Trunk
2. Campus Relief Subtrunk
3. Michelson Relief Subtrunk & Force Main
(Von Karman-Michelson Pumping Station)
4. Main Street Relief Subtrunk
(Von Karman~Jamboree)
5. Main Stt·eet Relief Subtrunk
(Lane Rd. P.S. MacArthur)
6. South Irvine Relief Subtrunk
(S. I. Lift Station -Red Hill)
7. South Irvine L.S. Force Main
(S. I. Lift Station -Red Hill)
8. McGaw Subtrunk Parallel
9. Pumping Station Modifications:
a. Lane Road Pumping Station
b. Michelson Drive Pumping Station
c. McGaw Lift Station
d. MacArthur Pumping Station
10. South Irvine Lift Station
TOTAL
INCREASE
( 1) From Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer
District Nos. 1, 6, and 7, December 1982
CONSOLIDATED ( l)
MASTER PLAN
$2,425,000
280,000
283,000
225,000
355,000
110, 000
60,000
155,000
65,000
1, 525, 000
$5,483,000
Facilities,
(2) From report of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer Route lrw~stigation,
November 1, 1983 (includes two pipe size increases)
FACILITIES REQUIRED TO SERVE
CURRENTLY PROPOSED LAND USES
$3, 520, 000 (2)
215,000
275,000
319,000
79,000
355,000
30,000
60,000
155,000
65,QOO
1,700,000
$6,773,000
$1,290,000
S RELIEF TRUNK
<+:~ ~)----. · ... ~r
ATION
IN DARY
a.
AV
IRVINE/NEWPORT
BUSINESS .·COMPLEX
STUDY
41 ..
FEB.1984
FIGURE I
.. ,-"',;..
~ ......
~ ;:._ ..
January:-26, 1984
~
\
~
\
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT
ON
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALJFORNIA92708
(714) 540-2910
(714)962-2411
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
FOR .
IMPACT REPORT
MASTER PLAN OF SEWAGE
DISTRICTS NO. 2, 3
~' f
COLLECTION {'
and 11
At the regular meeting on November 9, the Boards of Directors of
Districts 2, 3 and 11 conducted a public hearing on the Draft EIR for
the Master Plan of Sewage Collection for Districts No. 2, 3 and 11.
A representative of the Districts' consultant, Michael Brandman
Associates reviewed the Draft EIR which had previously been mailed to
the Directors with a staff summary. Following the close of the
hearing the Boards fixed the period for comments on the Draft EIR and
directed staff and the consultant to prepare the Final EIR after the
close of comment period.
The EIR identifies and addresses unavoidable adverse impacts
(those impacts which continue to be of significance even when all
feasibly known and identified mitigation measures are applied) that
are temporary and short term such as effects on wildlife, parks and
other open space, air quality, noise and visual impacts, all encoun-
tered during construction activities.
Other impacts which can be mitigated include disruption to
endangered species, potential impacts on cultural resources, some
noise and safety impacts, traffic and circulation impacts and protec-
tion of coastal area resources.
Since the hearing, the Districts have received the following
comments on the Draft EIR which are swmnarized along with the environ-
mental consultant's responses:
California Office of Resources, Energy and Permit Assistance
The remarks from the Off ice of Resources were advisory in nature,
pointing out that comments received from interested parties on the
Draft EIR during the review period had to be addressed in detail and
supported. The letter further stated that the lead agency (Districts
2, 3 & 11) must make written findings for each significant effect and
must support its actions with a written statement of overriding con-
siderations for each unmitigated significant effect.
These items have been addressed in the enclosed Resolution
No. 84-17, A Resolution Of The Boards Of Directors Of County
~ Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, Certifying Final Environmental
Impact Report, Master Plan Of Sewage Collection, Districts 2, 3, and
11, Making Certain Findings In Connection Therewith, And Adopting A
Statement Of Overriding Considerations, which has been prepared in
accordance with ·current CEQA Guidelines.
California Department of Fish & Game
The major comments received were from the California Department of
Fish and Game and were pertinent only to District No. 11 relating to
protection of wildlife resources, wetlands and vegetation. Fish and
Game is concerned that adequate mitigation measures be included in the
Coast Trunk project to safeguard Balsa Chica.
The EIR includes stipulations that an erosion-siltation control
plan will be reviewed and approved by the Regional water Quality
Control Board prior to construction, a revegetation plan will be pre-
pared, a construction window that avoids interference with endangered
or migratory species shall be incorporated, gasketed joints will be
used to prevent infiltration into the groundwater. It also provides
for a commitment to a 30-foot construction corridor and assurances for
coordination with Fish & Game on alignments and mitigation measures.
Fish & Game also prefers either the no project or parallel line
alternative for the Bluff Line Trunk Sewer Ca portion of the Coast
Trunk Line> •
The Final EIR states the Districts contemplate that the alignment
would follow the Springdale Avenue extension and we would coordinate
the trunk line construction activities with that work. However, if
the roadway extension does not occur, the Districts will seek to
determine a precise alignment which minimizes impacts to the Balsa
Chica ecosystem in full cooperation with Fish & Game and the Coastal
Commission.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region
The Regional Water Quality Control Board's comments included the
necessity for an erosion-siltation plan, and concerns about the
effects of the projects on amounts and quality of wastewater treated
and discharged by the Districts.
The Final EIR incorporates the erosion-siltation plan and states
that an EIR for the Districts Joint Works Master Plan will soon be
prepared and will address the impacts of generation, treatment and
disposal.
-2-
Cities of Buena Park, Huntington Beach, Orange, and Santa Ana
~ Comments on the Draft EIR were received from the Cities of Buena
Park, Huntington Beach, Orange and Santa Ana. The City of Santa Ana
stated their concerns had been addressed in their Notice of
Preparation response. The other cities' concerns generally related to
construction impacts, advisement of planned projects or current con-
ditions and impacts on underground utilities. The City of Orange
suggested an alternate route for the Olive/Taft Subtrunk. The City of
Huntington Beach expressed concern about effects on wildlife, vegeta-
tion, irrigation and drainage in the Central Park.·
~
'•1
The Final EIR addresses these comments (see abov~ under California
Department of Fish & Game). Prior to final design or construction the
Districts will closely coordinate with each of the affected cities and
will incorporate the cities' concerns into the projects.
Amigos de Bolsa Chica
The last written conunent received was from the Amigos de Balsa
Chica. It addressed wetlands protection and mitigation measures.
These items were also addressed in response to the comments made
by Fish & Game.
Signal Landmark, Inc.
Signal stated by telephone that they had no comments.
The comments and responses are more fully detailed in the enclosed
Final EIR and Resolution No. 84-17. Consideration of approval of
the Final EIR will be placed on the Boards' agenda for the regular
February 8, 1984 meeting.
IF ANY DIRECTOR HAS A QUESTION, PLEASE CAL
TOM DAWES OR HILARY BAKER, 540-2910
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 84-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3 AND 11, CERTIFYING
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT "MASTER PLAN OF
SEWAGE COLLECTION, DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3 & 11",
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH,
AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1982 the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 of Orange County, California, adopted
a Sewage Collection System Master Plan for Districts No. 2, 3 and 11
(the Project), and
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (hereinafter
"DISTRICTS") are the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for projects contained within said Master Plan as
defined in the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
(hereinafter "CEQA") and the State of California Guidelines for the
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act as modified and
adopted by the DISTRICTS (hereinafter "CEQA Guidelines")1 and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate an objective assessment of the indi-
vidual and collective environmental impacts associated with the expansion of
the sewage collection system, the DISTRICTS have caused to be prepared, a Draft
Environmental Impact Report "Master Plan of Sewage Collection, Districts Nos. 2,
3 and 11" to address the significant, adverse environmental impacts, mitigation
measures and project alternatives associated with the Project1 and
WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have consulted with other public agencies, and
the general public and given them an opportunity to comment on said Draft EIR as
required by the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines1 and
1
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1983, a duly noticed public hearing was held
by the Boards of Directors of the DISTRICTS to provide a further opportunity for ~
the general public to comment on and respond to the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have evaluated the comments received from
public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, said comments and reconunendations received o~ the Draft EIR,
either verbatim or in sununary, a list of persons, organizations and public agen-
cies commenting on the Draft EIR, and the responses of the DISTRICTS to signif i-
cant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process have
been included in and made a part of said Draft EIR to form the Final EIR for
said Project as required by Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, said Final EIR has been presented to the Boards of Directors
of DISTRICTS for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and
commitment to, any Master Plan projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directqrs of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 & 11 of Orange County, California as follows:
1. That the Boards of Directors of said DISTRICTS do hereby certify that
the Final Environmental Impact Report, "Master Plan of Sewage Collection,
Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11" has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the
CEQA Guidelines and that the DISTRICTS have reviewed and considered the infor-
mation contained in said Final EIR pri~r to approval of, or commitment to, the
Project. Said Final EIR is composed of the following elements:
2
A. Draft Environmental Impact Report "Master Plan of Sewage Collection,
Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11" and all appendices thereto7
B. Comments and responses to comments on said Draft EIR7
2. That the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS do hereby find that changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which will
~
mitigate or avoid any significant adverse effects identified in the Final EIR a~
specifically itemized below.
A. Landform/Soils/Topography
Impacts: Construction of various projects contemplated in the Master
Plan will require temporary landform alterations7 e.g. trenching.
Certain projects will result in net earth removal.
Findings: All grading and landform alterations will be in accordance
with the appropriate jurisdiction's grading ordinances (Draft EIR,
page 3). Excess earth may be temporarily stockpiled for use in
landscaping, cover in sanitary landfills, as fill or it may be hauled
to a landfill for disposal. Landform impacts are temporary and will
be avoided when mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR are
applied.
Impacts: Erosion potential is increased during construction. The
proposed improvements may be subject to geologic hazards, e.g.
seismic shaking, liquefaction (Draft EIR, pages 3 and 15).
Findings: An erosion siltation control plan will be developed and
submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for alternate
3
phases of construction. Detailed geotechnical reports will be pre-
pared to determine local bedrock or soil conditions and to determine ~
proper methods of construction in the bluff areas (Draft EIR, page
15). Standard engineering practices will be employed to ensure
structural integrity of all facilities. Seismic considerations will
be evaluated in conjunction with design. Implementation of the
adopte~lmitigation measure~ identified in the Final EIR will elimi-
l
nate significant adverse impacts.
B. Hydrology
Impacts: During construction, open trenches will be subject to
groundwater infiltration and the collection of rainfall and surface
runoff during storms (Draft EIR, page 3).
Findings: Mitigation measures included within the Final EIR are the \.J
use of portable sump pumps discharging into an existing sewer line
to control groundwater, use1 of gasketed joints to control infiltra-
' I
I tion, de13ign of the Coast T~~unk Sewer to r·esist flotation if a
I
flooding hazard exists, and discharge of surface runoff to the
existing storm drain system (Draft EIR, page 20). These adopted
measures will eliminate significant adverse impact. Discharge of
groundwater and surface runoff will be in accordance with the
DISTRICTS' NPDES dewatering permit.
Impacts: Orange County Environmental Management Agency flood
control channels may require crossing or undergrounding of sewer
lines (Draft EIR, page 3).
4
Findings: Projects which could impact flood control facilities will
be reviewed by Orange County Environmental Management Agency when
applications for permits are filed (Draft EIR, page 20).
Coordination with Orange County Environmental Management Agency will
mitigate significant adverse impacts.
c. Biology
Impacts: No significant biological impacts are expected in
Districts Nos. 2 or 3. While most projects in District No. 11 are
within street rights of way, the coastal reach of Edwards Trunk Bluff
Line Sewer will likely be located along the eastern edge of the .Bolsa
Chica lowlands. The project could potentially impact the breeding
season of the Belding's savannah sparrow (a State-designated
endangered species) and the tidal flats, marsh habitat and wildlife
populations within the inunediate project vicinity. Some vegetation
removal would be required (Draft EIR, page 23).
Findings: In keeping with their restoration of Bolsa Chica, the
California Department of Fish & Game recommended avoiding placement
of a sewer line at the base of the Huntington Beach Bluffs in the
Bolsa Chica area. The DISTRICTS have considered the reconunendation;
however, in order to maintain gravity flow, the line must be at the
base of the bluffs. .It is anticipated that it would be placed in
existing or planned roadways. The DISTRICTS will coordinate with the
California Department of Fish and Game and the California Coastal
Conunission on the final trunk sewer alignment in the Bosa Chica area
5
following final certification of the Local Coastal Plan and Land Use
Plan for that area. The DISTRICTS find that with appropriate mitiga-~
tion measures as outlined in the Final EIR (page 27) and coordination
with the California Department of Fish & Game, the impacts can be
mitigated to a level of non-significance.
D. Cultural Resources
Impacts: Within the District No. 11 project area, eleven archaeol-
ogical sites have been identified, all of which have been previously
surveyed. However, these sites are along the top of the bluff and
it is anticipated that the sewer would be located at the base. The
Coast Trunk could impact these resources (Draft EIR, page 29).
Findings: If the final alignment for the Coast Trunk traverses any
archaeological deposits, an archaeologist will be contacted and the
appropriate measures for salvaging these resources will be imple-
mented. The mitigation measures included in the Draft EIR (page 30)
eliminate the potential for significant adverse impact.
E. Existing Land Uses
Impacts: Disruption to residential and commercial areas as well as
schools may occur during construction activities (Draft EIR,
page 34).
Findings: Mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR (page 35)
will be incorporated into each project as appropriate. The impacts
to the surrounding land uses will be substantially reduced with
approval of the identified mitigation measures.
6
F. Relevant Planning Programs
Impacts: It is possible that during construction, groundwater may
infiltrate open trenches which would require pumping (Draft EIR,
page 38).
Findings: All discharges of groundwater shall be in accordance
with the DISTRICTS' NPDES dewatering permit issued by thJ Regional
Water Quality Control Board (Draft EIR, page 39). This control will
mitigate any groundwater impacts to a non-significant level.
Impacts: Projects in District No. 11 will impact the coastal zone
(Draft EIR, page 39).
Findings: The proposed Master Plan is consistent with the City of
Huntington Beach Local Coastal Plan goal of ensuring adequate sewer
capacities. Sewer improvements in the Bolsa Chica area will be
subject to a Coastal Conunission permit. Compliance with Coastal
Conunission policies and local City requirements will mitigate any
impacts on the Coastal Zone (Draft EIR, page 39).
G. Transportation
Impacts: Potential traffic congestion, changes to circulation
patterns and traffic control will have a short term impact on the
project. areas during construction (Draft EIR, page 44).
Findings: The DISTRICTS will closely coordinate with the affected
cities and CalTrans on traffic control and traffic patterns. Where
7
possible, alternate construction techniques such as tunneling will
be used to minimize traffic impacts (Draft EIR, page 46). With the
mitigation measures outlined in the EIR, the traffic impacts can be
reduced to a level of insignificance. The DISTRICTS will take.: par-
ticular care in coordinating construction on Taft, Meats and Tustin
Street in the City of Orange (Comments and Responses Addendum
pages 20 & 21).
H. Public Utilities
Impacts: Potential impacts include disruption to service and
interference with other ongoing utility projects (Draft EIR, page
53-58).
Findings: The DISTRICTS will mitigate these impacts to a level of
insignificance through close coordination with all utility companies
during design of the projects. The DISTRICTS will comply with the
Department of Health & Safety's criteria for separation of water
mains and sanitary sewers (Draft EIR, page 59 and 60).
3. The Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS further find that although changes,
alterations or conditions have been incorporated into the projects contemplated
in the Master Plan which will substantially mitigate or avoid significant
effects identified in the Final EIR, certain of the significant effects cannot
be mitigated to fully acceptable levels. The remaining impacts identified below
may continue to be of significant adverse impact even when all feasibly known
and identified mitigation measures are applied.
8
A. Impacts to land uses in all three Districts will be short-term in
nature but unavoidable. Parks and other open space land uses may be
temporarily impacted by construction. Construction of the Carbon
Canyon improvements may temporarily impact park usage or create
nuisances to park users. Improvements are also proposed in the City
of Huntington Beach's Central Park area (Draft EIR, page 34).
I , \
Findings: I Temporary impacts to park land and open space during con-
struction are an unavoidable effect of project implementation.
These impacts are of a temporary nature and will be mitigated to the
fullest extent possible. If an alignment is chosen which traverses
Central Park in Huntington Beach, it will be limited to undeveloped
or manicured areas, not the Park's Nature Area. Upon completion of
the projects, revegetation will occur. The Boards of Directors find
it infeasible to further mitigate the impacts to park lands and open
spaces. The projects outlined in the EIR are necessary to accom-
modate the .wastewater flows ge~erated by City and County approved
developmenb plans. If the prJjects are not implemented, development
I
could be curtailed or reliability of the wastewater collection system
could be reduced.
B. Short-term construction equipment emissions will result during
grading and construction activities (Draft EIR, page 47).
Findings: The proposed projects will lead to construction activities
which will cause temporary increases in exhaust and fugitive dust
emissions in the inunediate vicinity of construction. The DISTRICTS
9
will comply with Rule 403 of the Southern California Air Quality
Maintenance District (SCAQMD) Rules regarding fugitive dust
emissions (Draft EIR, page 49). In approving the projects subject
to the conditions and mitigations set forth, the DISTRICTS are doing
all that is feasibly and reasonably possible at a local level for
short term construc~ion impacts. The decrease in electrical usage
with the construction of the proposed Bolsa·Chica Pump Station will
help offset some air quality impacts as it will replace four existing
less energy efficient pump stations (Draft EIR, page 48).
c. Increased noise during construction
Findings: All construction activities will comply with the noise
limitations set by the individual cities or .the County of Orange.
Proper use and maintenance of noise reduction devices on heavy
equipment will help to mitigate the problem and construction activi-
ties will be limited to daylight hours in noise sensitive areas
(Draft ERI, page 51). In the Bolsa Chica area, if disturbances to
local aquatic and estuarine resources occur; the DISTRICTS will con-
sider installing appropriate screening to help mitigate the noise and
visual impacts of construction (CollDllents and Responses Addendmn,
(page 28).
o. Short term visual impacts from trenching, machinery and dirt pilings
will occur during construction.
Findings: Efforts will be made to minimize the visual impacts during
construction. Mitigations include constructing the Project in short
10
segments (e.g., 1 mile) in order to confine the impact, reestablish-
ment of landscaped areas after construction, removal or recontouring
of excess earth, and burial of all sewer lines with minimal grading
disturbance on slopes (Draft EIR, page 61 and 62). The Boards of
Directors find the above mitigation measures will substantially
reduce the impact and that further measures are not economically
feasible for a short term impact.
E. Resident wildlife of Bolsa Chica in the immediate project vicinity
are expected to experience short term adverse impacts associated with
construction disturbances. Many species can be expected to move to
areas of similar habitat at the onset of activity, providing such
of low mobility and those refusing to emigrate would be subject to
elimination by site preparation. Following construction, some spe-
cies would return to the pipeline corridor provided suitable habitat
regeneration occurs.
Findings: Temporary impacts to resident wildlife are an unavoidable
effect of project implementation. Given the relatively short period
of time over which construction disturbances are expected to prevail,
the relatively small amount of habitat affected, and the marginal or
disturbed nature of this habitat, it is not expected that wildlife
population dynamics or the general ecology of the area would be
significantly affected over the long term.
4. Certain changes or alterations (e.g., mitigation measures) are required
in or incorporated into the Project through the permitting responsibility and
11
jurisdiction of a public agency other than County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3
and 11. These changes will be included in permits obtained from the applicable ~
agency by DISTRICT or its contractor as itemized below:
A. Rule 403 of the Air Quality Management Plan is applicable to the pro-
jects and when implemented provides partial mitigation for short term
air quality impacts. The South Coast Air Quality Management District
is responsible for insuring compliance with and implementation of
these rules.
B. A California Coastal Permit will be required for any construction in
the coastal area of Huntington Beach. The California Coastal
Commission is responsible for issuance of the permit and insuring
implementation of certain projects in accordance with the rules of
the Coastal Commission.
c. Construction permits for the Projects are required from the City in
which the work will take place. Enforcement of the grading and
construction permits will involve, on a project by project basis, one
or more of the following cities: Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Cypress,
Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Habra,
La Palma, Los Alamitos, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Seal Beach,
Stanton, Villa Park, Westminster and Yorba Linda. The County
Environmental Management Agency will be responsible for construction
permits in County owned streets and any permits which might be
required in connection with flood control facilities.
12
-..
D. Encroachment permits for construction in State Highways will be
required for some projects. CalTrans is responsible for insuring
compliance with requirements contained in the encroachment permit.
E. A dewatering permit will be required for discharge of groundwater
encountered during construction. The Regional Water Quality Control
Board is responsible for insuring compliance with dewatering permit
requirements.
F. Construction in the Bolsa Chica area will be closely monitored by the
California Department of Fish & Game.
s. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanita-tion Districts
Nos. 2, 3 and 11 have balanced the benefits of the proposed Project against its
unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve said Project.
'..I The Boards do hereby further find, determine and state, pursuant to the provi-
sions of Section 15093 of the State Guidelines, that the occurrence of those
certain significant environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and set
forth in Paragraph 3 above have been found acceptable and will be permitted
without further mitigation due to the following overriding considerations:
...._;·
A. The projects are necessary to accommodate wastewater flows from
ongoing development approved by the local zoning authorities. The
DISTRICTS are a single purpose agency with the responsibility to
collect, treat and dispose of wastewater generated within the
DISTRICTS' service area. Construction of the Project identified in
the EIR is necessary to provide sewerage facilities to serve develop-
13
ment approved. by the Cities and County after separate environmental
review by the approving entity as identified in local land use plans. ~
B. The Boards of Directors find that implementation of the project
alternatives identified in the Final EIR are infeasible as follows:
1. No Project Alternative. The DISTRICTS' sole function is to pro-
vide sewerage facilities to adequately collect, treat and dispose
of wastewater. If the no project alternative is implemented and .
no new facilities are built to accommodate City and County
approved land uses, the sewer system will become unreliable with
potential raw sewage back-up in the street and discharge of
untreated wastewater to the ocean.
2. Paralleling Deficient Sewers. It is not as cost effective to
parallel existing lines because smaller interceptor sewers
between Districts• existing trunk sewers can relieve some of the
deficiencies with less construction. In the Bolsa Chica area the
topography largely dictates the alignment and paralleling of
existing deficient sewers is not possible.
3. Provision of Lesser/Greater Capacity. Installation of smaller
pipes than identified would not meet planned land use development
of the Cities and County thus either limiting growth or necessi-
tating construction of additional facilities at a higher cost
in the near future. Installation of larger trunk lines than
identified in the Master Plan is not warranted at this time and
14
could be growth inducing. The DISTRICTS' responsibility is to
serve anticipated growth, not to act as the vehicle by which
growth is induced or restricted.
c. For the reasons set forth above it is not economically feasible to
further mitigate or avoid the environmental effects hereinabove
identified.
PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1984
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
COMMEN rs AND RESPONSES
TO DRAFT EIR
MASTER PLAN OF SEWAGE COLLECTION
DIS TRIC rs 2, 3, AND 11
SCH +83082411
Lead Agency:
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Cotmty
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
(714) 540-2910
Contact Person: Ms. Hilary Baker
Prepared by:
Michael Brandman Associates
18021 Sky Park Circle, Suite E-2
Irvine, California 92714
(714) 250-1066
Conte.ct Person: Ms. Sandra Bauer
February 1984
-
-
-
-
TABLE OP CONTENTS
Comments and Responses
State of California, Office of Planning and Research •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1
State of California, Department of Fish and Game ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2
California Regional Water Quality Control Board •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15
City of Se.nta Ana ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 7
City of &Jena Park •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 18
City of Orange ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••• 20
City of Huntington Beach •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 23
Amigos de :Bolsa Chica ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26
Signal Landmark, Irle ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 30
General Corrections to the Text ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 31
Attachment A: Original Comment Letters
-
-
. --.... -
State of California, Office of Planning and Research
November 28, 1983
Comment il
When preparing the final Em, you must include all comments and responses (CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15146). The certified EIR must be considered in the decision-
making process f o~ the project.·
A 1981 Appellate Court Decision in Cleary vs. County of Stanislaus (118 Cal. App. 3d
348) clarified requirements for responding to review comments. Specifically, the
court indicated that comments must be addressed in detail, giving re&Sons why the
specific comments and suggestions were not accepted. The responses must show
factors of overriding significance which required the suggestion or comment to be
rejected. Responses to comments must not be conclusory statements but must be
supported by empirical or experimental data, scientific authority, or explanatory
inf orma ti on of any kind.
In the event that the project is approved without adequate mitigation of significant
effects, the lead agency must make written findings for each significant effect and
it must support its actions with a written statement of overriding considerations for
each unmitigated significant effect (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088 and 15089).
If the project requires discretionary approval from any state agency, the Notice of
Determination must be filed with the Secretary for Resources, as well as with the
County Clerk.
Response 11
Written findings for significant effects of the project will be prepared pursuant to
the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County procedures for the implementation
of Section 15091 and Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines (formerly Sections 15088
and 15089). These findings will be offered for consideration by the public and the
CSDOC Boards of Directors during their deliberations on the project. It is the intent
of CSDOC to comply fully with CEQA and State EIR Guidelines throughout the BIR
process. A Notice of Determination will be filed with the Secretary for Resources
and the County Clerk.
-1-
California Department of Pish and Game
Pred A. Worthley, Jr., Regional Manager
November 25, 1983
Comment tl
We have no comments regarding the EIR's discussion of the proposed actions in
Districts 2 and 3. However, the proposed action in District 11 is of direct concern to
t
the Department as significant adverse impacts could occur to fish and wildlife
resources and those impacts have not been adequately addressed in the document.
We believe that an accurate description of the project site within the Bolsa Chica
lowlands, specific site impacts, and positive mitigation proposals must be contained
in the document.
We cite the following inadequacies of the document in presenting the existing natural
wildlife resources, the projected impacts, and compensatory measures.
Response il
Comments so noted; please see specific responses to each identified concern.
Comment 12
Landf orm/Soils/Geology
Grading ordinances ·have not proven adequate in protecting wetlands and their
endemic resources.
Response 12
Comment so noted. Please see Response #1 to the Santa Ana R WQCB's concern
which states that an erosion-siltation control plan for all phases of construction will
be developed and submitted for approval by the Santa Ana RWQCB prior to the
commencement of any construction activities.
-·--···-· ... -· . -2-
-
-
.i ·----··.
Comment 13
Biology
The mentioned time restriction of construction .will not prevent detrimental impacts
upon the. fish and wildlife resources. Resources other than the listed sparrow and
migratory species should be considered.
Response 13
The reader is referred to Responses Number 12 and 13.
Comment 14
Page 10, Table 1. The basis for the 3 mgd additional now at Bolsa Chica requires
substantiation.
Response 14
Recent planning for Bolsa Chica show development plans producing average sewage
flows ranging from 1 to 3 mgd. A sewage coefficient was selected for this area,
which resulted in average flows of 3 mgd, matching those of the most sewage-
intensive development plan ·(Lowry & Associates. CSDOC Districts 2, 3, &: 11,
Sewage Collection System Master Plan).l At such time as a final development plan
is approved for Bolsa Chica, a precise sewage flow for Bolsa Chica can be
determined. It is not expected to exceed 3 mgd.
Comment 15
Exhibit 3. The proposed system deficiencies are inadequately described to permit an
adequate evaluation. We recommend the County plan to avoid the valuable wetlands
of Bolsa Chica altogether, especially because less environmentally damaging,
feasible alternatives exist.
1 This Master Plan is available for review at the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County main office in Fountain Valley.
-3-
-
_ ....
--....
Response 15
Comment so noted. To assist in the evaluation of system deficiencies, the following
table has been excerpted from the Sewage Collection Master Plan prepared for
Districts 2, 3, and 11. The reader is also referred to Exhibit 11 in the EIR. This
table lists design capacities, computed peak nows, and monitored flows in each of
the major trunk systems.
CDF&G's recommendation to avoid placing a sewer line in the wetlands of Bolsa
Chica is hereby aclmowledged and will be considered by the Board of Directors in
their deliberations on the project.
Comment 16
Mitigation Measure 2, page 20. The use of gasketed joints will minimize possible
infiltration of perched groundwater to the sewerage system. A comparable
assessment should be provided to determine if gasketed joints will eliminate
sewerage infiltration into the groundwater and wetlands.
Response i6
Comment so noted. CSDOC was contacted regarding this question and indicated that
all sewer lines are emplaced with gas.keted joints, which will prevent sewage
infiltration into the groundwater and wetlands.
Comment 17
Page 21, District 11. It does not appear that the proposed project would actually
"skirt" the southern edge of the Bolsa Chica lowlands. If the route is at the base of
the Huntington Beach Bluffs (as described in the third paragraph), then it does not
skirt the edge, but is within them. The pump station location and the sewer line
should be kept out of the wetlands.
-4-
l I I l I I l l l ( ( ( . I I -{_ ( l l l
SUMMARY Of EXISTING SYSTEM
DESIGN CAPACUIES 1 COMPUTED ANO MONITORED FLOWS
(* = Deficient reach tndlcated by computer run)
DESIGN COMPUTED PEAK FLOW MONITORING DATA DESCRIPTION CAPACITY EXISTING ULTIMATE PEAK FLOW YEAR fcii9d) (mgd) lni9ilr lni9iJl
Hiller-Holder Trunk sistena
---Main Trunk ---
102-110 Plant No. 2 to Ellis 69-60 48-39 51-41 112-114 Eilts to Nichols St. 62-51 38-35 40-38 20 1982 116-126 Nichols to Garden Grove Blvd. 51-32 12-25 34-27 128-134 Garden Grove Blvd. to Orange 24-23 24-20 *26-21 136-142 Orange to Thelma 19-17 *19-17 •19-17 144-152 Thelma to Rostrata 17-9 14-J 15-J --153-174 Rostrata to Imperial Hwy. 26-15 ·•20-18 •21-18 13 1982 125-182 Beach Blvd to e/o Palm 9-4 •7-l *9-3
---Sub-Trunks ---
183 On E 11 h from Magno 11 a to Bushard 6 1 1 184 On Nichols from Slater to Warner 10-7 0 0 185 On McFadden from Hoover to Van Buren 2 2 2
U1 186-187 On Orange from Valley View to Knott 4 1-0 l-0 188-190 On 8th and Western from Knott to 10-8 5-0 5-0 Orangethorpe
191-197 On Orangethorpe from Western to ll-30 30-28 •JS-33 Hagnol la
198-199 On Artesia from Rostr~ta to.Dale 2 *4-2 *5-3
Knott lnterceetor Srstem
---Hain Trunk ----
201 Plant No. 2 to EJlts 139 123 136 202-206 Ellts to Newland 141-136 123 136 89 1982 207-209 Slater to Bolsa 121-114 107-105 115-113 210-212 Newland to Hoover & Hazard 104-103 93 101
2ll-214 Hoover to Westminster 99 81-78 88-86 215-220 Westminster to Katella 79-72 51-49 57-55 221-226 Katella lo Cresent 77-56 49-44 55-50 227-228 Cresent to Orangethorpe 53 43 48 229-236 Orangethorpe to Rostrata 22-17 16 l7
---Sub-Trunks ---
238-239 On Seal Beach Blvd. from Westminster 23 23-19 *24-20 to n/o San Otego Fwy.
240-251 Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk 32-1 *8-2 *9-l 270-274 On Slater From Beach to Gothard 40-16 *20-IO *26-ll 275-278 On Oolsa from Newland to Magnolia 21-17 16 16 280-284 On Westminster from Goldenwest to 33-32 30-29 31 Rancho Rd.
I I l -l l l -l • I l ( I I f t l ( l ( -----~----
DESIGN COMPUTED PEAK FLOW tllNITORING DATA DESCRIPTION CAPACITY EXISTING ULTIMATE PEAK FLOV YEAR lm9dl {mgar (mgd) --rmm -
285-295 Hoover-Western Sub-Trunk 5-l *15-9 *15-9 l 1982 296-298 Orange-Western Sub-Trunk 4-l *5-4 *5-4 299 On Orangethorpe from Knott to Western 35 28 ll
HagnoltaLBushard Trunk System
---Hatn Trunk ----
302-304 Plant No. 2 to flits 37-32 25 26
306 Ellis to Talbert 72 25 26 11.6 1982 3oi-316 Talbert to Bolsa 30-28 25-19 26-19 118-326 Bolsa to Katella 30-21 •l0-18 *ll-18 328-330 Katella to Broadway 15-13 15-11 15-11 --------. 332-336 Broadway to Orangethorpe --~--ll-10 8-1 8-1
---Sub-Trunks ---
342-344 On Bolsa from Magnolia to Maxine 5 3-1 3-1 346-360 On Orangethorpe from Magnolia 18-17 *23-22 *26-24 to Brookhurs t
362 On Orangethorpe from Brookhurst 12 11 12 to Eucltd
O'\ Coast Trunk Srstem
---Hain Trunk ---
480-484 Plant Ho. 2 to Newland 11-56 ll-12 16-15 485-489 Hewland to Walnut 44-34 6-5 6-5 490-493 Walnut to Golden West 41-37 4-2 4-2
---Sub-Trunks ---
450 Newland St. Interceptor 11 8 10
452-468 Newland-Delaware Gravity Trunk 10-4 8-0 *10-1 470-472 Atlanta Interceptor Sewer 6-l 1 I 475-478 Lake Ave Interceptor 2-1 1 1 401-404 Slater Ave Sewer 26-19 18 *25
405-423 Slater-Springdale & Edinger Relief 13-3 •11-4 *15-5 424-437 Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer 5-1 *5-1 •7-1 438-440 Golden West Trunk Sewer 1 •J-1 •3-1 441-442 Warner Ave Relief Sewer l 2 2 443-449 Edlnger-Oolsa Chica Trunk Sewer 3-1 1 1 445 Edtnger Gravity Sewer 3-1 *2 *2
fuclld Trunk sistem
---Main Trun~ ----
500-506 Ellis to Trask 21-15 *24-15 *29-17 15 1982 508-522 Trask to la Palma 15-21 15-8 15-11 524-526 La Palma to Orangethorpe 8-7 6 •10-9 594-595 Euclid Purchase n/o Ball 8-4 •6 *8 566-593 Euclid Purchase s/o Ball 12-8 6 8
I I I l I l l 1 I l ( ( I ( f -l { l (
·---··---...
DESIGN COMPUTED PEAK FLOW KJNITORING DATA DESCRIPTION CAPACITY EXISTING ULTIMAfE PEAK FLOW YEAR \iiiicl) (mgd) \iiiiclr --rmgaJ
---Sub-Trunk ---
530-532 Fullerton-Brea Purchase s/o 6-5 *15-12 Fullerton Channel *20-17 9 1982
533-565 Fullerton-Brea Purchase n/o 3-1 *6-4 Fullerton Channel *10-9 2 1982
Newho~e Placentia Trunk srstem
---Matn Trunk ---
602-618 Plant No. 1 to Lewis 44-34 *53-27 *65-29 38 1982 620-648 LeHls to La Palma 34-20 27-16 28-17
---Sub-Trunk ---
699 On Bolsa from Newhope to Harbor 4 *4 *5
680-683 So. Anaheim Int. s/o Chapman 12-11 *19-17 *24-29
684-689 So. Anaheim Int. n/o Chapman 5 *17-9 *19-ll 6 1982 600 Orange Sub-Trunk 8 2 2
690-698 Atwood Sub-Trunk St. College 16-9 10-1 11-1
to Kraemer
650-662 Cypress Ave Sub-Trunk 10-2 1-2 *7-6
664-677 Rolling Htl\s Sub-Trunk 5-4 2-1 5-4 '-l 678-679 North Branch of Rolling Hiils 2 1 1
601 On 1st Ave. from St. College 1 1 2
to West St.
89-96 Cypress Sub-Trunk From 2 1 2-1
From Y.L. Blvd. to Imperial
60-68 Pioneer Branch 2 2-1 2-1
Santa Ana River lnterce~tor Sistem
700-726 Ellis To La Palma 198-180 62-34 93-62 41 1982 728-740 La Palma lo Kellogg 180-41 34-12 30-28
742-792 Kellogg to County Boundary 34 12-0 20-1
---Sub-Trunk ---
801 Santa Ana River to Bristol 21 15 16
830-836 Oltve Sub-Trunk/Batavia 1 *S-2 •7-2 2 1982 to Santiago
802-812 Olive Sub-Trunk/S.A. River 8-1 *14-4 *18-6
to Batavia
814-824 Olive Sub-Trunk/Batavia I 1 ·•]
to Meats
840-849 AlHood Sub-Trunk/Hiller 7-6 *10-7 *14-8 lo R tchfleld
850-856 Rlchf leld Sub-Trunk 8-2 2-1 l-1
860-862 Kellogg Sub-Trunk/SA 13-11 6-4 9-7
to La Palma
864-866 Kellogg Sub-Trunk/la Palma 2-1 *4-l *6
lo Imperial
880-889 So. Santa Ana River Int. 11-5 5-1 11-4
50-59 Kraemer Blvd. Int. 67-9 9-3 14-4
1-46 Carbon Canyon Int. 47-10 22-1 )5-6
-
Response i'I
CDF&G's position of the location of the pump station and sewer line is hereby
aclmowledged. It should be noted that definitive alignment has yet to be selected for
the Bluff-Line sewer pending resolution of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program
Land Use Plan, as discussed further in Response #11.
Comment ta
Page 22. We do not concur with the conclusions contained in the first three
paragraphs. The referenced disturbed areas, unvegetated areas, and veg~tated areas
are inadequately presented. The suggested non-wildlife areas or those of little use
are exaggerated. We reference the DFG document "Determination of the Status of
the Bolsa Chica Wetlands" dated December 11, 1981.
Response 18
It is not the intent of the referenced paragraphs to deny the value of the upland
terrestrial habitats to resident wildlife, but rather to emphasize that the habitat of
greate~ value in the project vicinity is the lowland aquatic and estuarine habitat.
This, of course, is borne out by the comparatively greater abundance and diversity of
wildlife encountered in this habitat, and the well documented high productivity of
this habitat type.
As the biological resources of the Bolsa Chica environs (including the project area)
have been thoroughly examined and documented in recent literature (see citations in
EIR text, p. 21, 22), it was considered in the preparation of the subject EIR that the
environmental review process and the intent of recent environmental legislation was
best served through incorporating this body of literature by reference. For this
reason, detailed descriptions of project area habitats do not appear within the text of
the EIR but are available to interested parties in the cited literature. Hereby added
to the citations is the following: California Department of Fish and Game (1981),
"Determination of the Status of the Bolsa Chica Wetlands."
. -8-
-
.. ·-·--·· -
The observation in the EIR text that the upland habitats along the proposed trunk
sewer alignment have generally experienced disturbance and modification by man is
supported by the literature {CDFG, 1981 does not deal materially with these upland
habitats).
Comment 19
Page 23, District 11 -paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 .. The Belding's savannah sparrow is an
endangered species.
Response 19
Comment acknowledged. The EIR text is hereby corrected accordingly.
Comment 110
Previous experience indicates the 30-foot wide construction corridor is less than that
actually used for construction activities. A more accurate corridor width should be
presented.
Comment 110
While construction activities do often extend outside a 30-foot corridor width, it
should be noted that the Districts have demonstrated the ability to work in
constrained corridors in environmentally sensitive areas. During the construction of
the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, the construction activities were confined to a 20-foot
wide corridor. CSDOC recognizes the environmental sensitivity of this project and
will take whatever precautions required to again stay within the boundary constraints
which have been set.
Comment 111
The removal of any marsh habitat must be avoided or adequately mitigated, yet this
is not discussed in the document. Unless the construction is within existing
roadways, we believe significant habitat destruction would occur. We believe the use
of even existing roadways for sewer line construction would undesirably restrict our
options for restoring the Balsa wetlands.
-9-
Response Ill
At the present stage of planning, the trunk sewer alignment in the Bolsa Chica area
is conceptual in nature, and the adoption of a precise alignment by CSDOC awaits
final certification by the California Coastal Commission of the Local Coastal Plan
Land Use Plan (LUP) for the Bolsa Chica area. It is presently contemplated that the
alignment would follow the future extension of Springdale Avenue as it is shown in
the LUP. Should this be the case, the construction or the Springdale extension would
be coordinated with the installation of the sewer line. In this scenario, the principal
habitat degradation and alteration in the area would result from roadway
construction and establishment of the planned ''linear park" through which the road
extension would pass. In this event, sewer line installation, per se, would likely not
impact any natural habitat in the area.
Should the Springdale Avenue extension and linear park not be implemented, CSDOC,
in full coordination with the California Department of Fish and Game and the
California Coastal Commission, will seek to determine a precise trunk sewer
alignment which minimizes to the extent possible adverse impacts upon the Bolsa
Chica ecosystem. At such time as this precise alignment is determined, potentially
affected resources can be identified more explicitly and appropriate mitigation
measures can be formulated.
Comment 112
The November through March time period is inadequate and resident species are not
adequately considered.
Besponse 112
In accord with the first portion of the comment dealing with migratory bird species
use of the Bolsa Gap, Dillingham (1971) indicates that a more accurate time period
to be noted for such usage would be August through March, and the EIR text is
hereby corrected accordingly. It should also be noted that Guthrie (1980), in his
evaluation of the importance of the Bolsa Chica area to migrating waterfowl along
the Pacific Flyway, found that the area is of relatively low importance in this
respect.
-10 -
In response to the second portion of the comment the EIR is hereby amended by
incorporation of the following paragraphs:
Resident wildlife in the immediate project vicinity are expected to experience
short term adverse impacts associated with construction disturbance. Many
species can be expected to attempt to move to adjacent areas of similar
habitat at the onset of activity, providing such habitat is available. Wildlife h i,
which do emigrate are particularly wlnerable to; mortality by predation and
unsuccessful competition fo~ food and territory. Species of low mobility and
those refusing to emigrate would be subject to outright elimination by site
preparation. This is particularly true of burrowing mammals and most
amphibians and reptiles. Following construction, some species would return to
the pipeline corridor provided suitable habitat regeneration occurs.
Given the relatively short period of time over which construction disturbance
would be expected to prevail, the relatively small amount of habitat affected,
and the marginal or disturbed nature of much of this habitat (probably roadway
margins in upland habitat), it is not expected that wildlife population dynamics
or the general ecology of the area would be significantly affected over the long
term.
Comment 113
Soils are generally salt-saturated; details of the proposed revegetation should be
provided to explain how it will be accomplished. The proposed August 15 through
December 15 construction period may avoid many confiicts with the Belding's
savannah sparrow but does not avoid the many impacts upon the migratory species as
stated.
Response 113
At such time as a precise trunk sewer alignment is determined by CSDOC in
coordination with the California Department of Fish and Game and before
construction is initiated, a revegetation plan appropriate to the conditions prevalent
within the pipeline corridor will be developed by CSDOC in coordination with the
California Department of Fish and Game. If considered warranted at this time, a
-11-
qualified horticultural firm will be selected to develop plant palates, determine
appropriate seed mixtures and methods of application, identify necessary soil
amendments, define required conditions for germination and establishment', etc.
Regarding mitigation of potential impacts of construction upon migratory species, it
is hereby acknowledged that the recommended construction time period restriction
would result in avoiding only a portion of the period of highest usage of the area by
migratory species, and the EIR. text is hereby corrected accordingly. The reader is
ref erred to Reponse #12 for a discussion of the significance of construction impacts
and the importance of the Bolsa Chica area to migratory waterfowl.
Comment 114
The potential of pump failure causing .sewage spills and those capable of the backup
system should be described in the document.
Response 114
Each pump station is equipped with independent stand-up pumps and motors capable
of handling the station's sewage nows, should the primary pump fail. The back-up
system is designed to ensure that sewage spills do not occur. 'lbe back-up system
remains in operation until the primary pump is repaired.
Comment 115
We do not concur that the· suggested mitigation measures are adequate in
maintaining the fish and wildlife resources of the Bolsa Gap.
Response 115
The reader is referred to Response #11.
Comment 116
Page 66, Alternatives. We would prefer either the No Project or the Paralleling Line
alternative as neither alternative would produce adverse impacts within District 11.
-12-
Response 116
CDF&G's comment regarding alternatives is acknowledged and will be considered by
the CSDOC Boards of Directors during their review of the project EIR.
Comment 11 'l
• Page 68. The fish and wildlife resources should be identified in the consideration of
the short-and long-term relationships.
,,,,,. --
Response 111
Comment so noted. The following paragraph is hereby incorporated in the
environmental docum enta ti on.
Short-term impacts to the fish and wildlife resources of the Bolsa Chica
wetlands will occur. These impacts will be minimized, however, by the
implementation of appropriate mitigation measures as outlined in the final
environmental documentation.
Comment 118
Page 69. Fish and wildlife losses caused by habitat destruction should be described
as significant irreversible changes, unless aU losses are avoided or impacts are
mitigated to a level of non-significance.
Response 118
At the appropriate time in project planning and design, it is the intention of the
project sponsor that a precise trtmk sewer alignment will be determined in
coordination with the California Department of Fish and Game. It is expected that
any potentially significant irreversible changes in biological-resources will be
mitigated to a level of non-significance by the nature of this alignment, in
conjunction with mitigation measures outlined in the EIR and additional measures
that may be formulated through the coordinated efforts of CSDOC and the
Department of Fish and Game.
-13 -
Comment 119
Page 71. Impacts to biological resources other than Belding's savannah sparrow are
not identified in the Biology section. Due to the lack of a complete biological
assessment we believe this sectiOn is inadequate.
Response 119.
'Ibe reader is ref erred to Response #18.
-
-
california Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region
Joanne E. Sehneider, Environmental Specialist
November 10, 1983
Comment 11
The DEIR·identifies potential erosion and siltation impacts during construction of the
sewage facilities and notes, appropriately, that such impacts warrant particular
concern in the Bolsa Chica area. While the summary of environmental impacts and
mitigation measures indicates that erosion control measures will be implemented
(page 3), these measures are not specified in the mitigation proposed for hydrological
impacts (page 20). The EIR should state that an erosion-siltation control plan for all
phases of construction must be submitted for approval by this office prior to the
commencement of any construction activities.
Respome il
Comment so noted. The following mitigation measure is hereby incorporated onto
page 20 of the final documentation.
6. An erosion-siltation control plan for all phases of construction will be
developed and submitted for approval by the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board prior to the commencement of any construction
activities.
Comment 12
The Regional Board is concerned about the project's potential impact on the quality
of wastewater treated and disposed of by the Regional Plants. The quality of
sewered wastewaters may affect the quality of the Regional Plant discharges; any
degradation of these discharges may result in subsequent negative impacts on ocean,
surf ace, or groundwaters.
The DEIR finds that, since the project involves no diversion or change in the patterns
of wastewater flows in Districts 2, 3, and 11, no degradation of wastewater quality
will occur (page 18). This conclusion, however, ignores the possible impacts which
changes in the amount and/or type of flows within the Districts may have on the
-15 -
-
-...
quality of the wastewaters treated and disposed of. These potential impacts should
be evaluated; subsequent impacts on effluent receiving waters should also be
addressed. This assessment should include the collective impacts of the several
collection system expansion projects currently proposed by CSDOC (this project;
Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No. 1, the
Northern Half of District No. 6, and District No. 7; County Sanitation District No. 13
Formation).
I
Response 12
Comment so noted. As stated on page 18 of the draft EIR, CSDOC has recently
completed a master plan for Treatment Plants 1 and 2 entitled Joint Works
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities. An EIR will be prepared for this
Master Plan in early 1984. This EIR will address the impacts of generation,
treatment, and disposal of ultimate sewage flows within the CSDOC service area. It
should be noted that the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board will be
regulating effluent discharge at both Treatment Plants 1 and 2 through the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Compliance with the
permit by CSDOC will mitigate the potential of negative impacts to receiving waters
from treatment plant effluent discharge.
Comment i3
The EIR should assess the impacts of ultimate project flows on treatment plant
capacities. This assessment should include the cumulative impacts of the combined
ultimate flows projected by the several collection system expansion programs now
under consideration.
Response 13
Comment so noted. See Response #2.
-16 -
-
--. -·
City of Santa Ana
c. Stephen Bucknam, Jr., Senior Civil. Engineer
November 28, 1983
Comment il:
Per your letter of October 13, 1983, regarding the above subject, we reviewed the
draft EIR. Mr. Walter D. Schraub's comments in his letter dated August 19, 1983, as
contained in the Appendix A, satisfy the concern of the City of Santa Ana.
Response 11:
Comment so noted.
-17-
City of Buena Park
Kenneth W. Griffith, Senior PJanner
October 11, 1983
(This NOP response was received subsequent to the distribution of the draft Em.)
Comment 11:
We believe the response from Mr. Carlos M. Jocson on the subject adequately
identifies the City's concerns regarding the project. Said letter dated September 9,
1983, is attached for your review.
Response 11:
Comment so noted. Please see following response to Mr. Jocson's letter.
Comment 12 (Received from Mr. Jocson):
The proposed improvements involving the installation of 8-inch, 21-inch, and 24-inch
sewer relief lines will be done along Orangethorpe Avenue, a major highway; along
Crescent Avenue and Artesia Boulevard, both secondary highways and along Beach
Boulevard, a state highway. These roads are currently paved with asphaltic concrete
of thicknesses varying from 3 inches to approximat.ely 15 inches over aggregate base
subgrade. It is suggested that pavement replacement be carried up to existing
traffic delineations and shall be of a thickness of equal or greater than existing.
We believe that during construction, there will be substantial change in existing
traffic conditions involving motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians, as well as
increases in existing noise, dust, and vibration levels. Impact upon our existing
underground utilities within the limits of construction will be dependent upon the
vertical and horizontal alignment of the proposed improvements.
Response 12:
Comment so noted and the inf or ma ti on presented in Mr. Jocson's letter is hereby
incorporated into the final environmental documentation. The reader is referred to
Sections 3.8, AIR QUALITY; 3.9, NOISE; and 3.7, TRANSPORTATION/
-18 -
I
I ! .;
CIRCULATION, in the EIR which discuss traffic, noise, dust, and related impacts;
~ appropriate mitigation measures are also provided in these sections.
I
I
~
' I '. I
~
I
~
I
i J
I
~
I. !
'..J
-19 -
City of Orange
Robert P. Beardsley, P.E., Asristant City F.ngineer /Superintendent of Streets
November 18, 1983
Comment 11:
The subject draft EIR discusses upgraded trunk facilities to be constructed along
Lincoln Avenue, Taft Avenue,· Tustin Street, and Meats Avenue in the City of
Orange. Since we are currently budgeted and preparing to bid street reconstruction
projects over the entire length of your planned work in Taft and Meats Avenues, we
would like to coordinate, or possibly merge, our separate contracts if our
construction dates are coincident. For your additional planning information, we soon
will be submitting a street reconstruction project for County AHFP participation
along Lincoln A venue, which, if approved, will be ready for construction by Spring
1985. Once a street is resurfaced, we allow no cuts, except for emergency work, f o~
a minimum of three years.
Response il:
Comment so noted. Construction efforts will be coordinated with the City of Orange
._ on Lincoln, Taft, and Meats Avenue.
-
Comment 12:
Although no mention was made in the Bibliography (Section 11. 0), we trust that your
master plan was prepared with consideration of our January 1982 Master Plan of
Sewers prepared by Willdan Associates and forwarded to you on March 11, 1982. The
land use map contained therein is essentially current for the purposes of your study.
Response 12:
The "City of Orange Sewer Master Plan," prepared by Willdan Associates (January
1982) was not directly used in the preparation of the EIR, and thus was not listed in
Section 11.0 of the EIR. The City's Master Plan, however, was utilized in
preparation of CSDOC's Master Plan for Districts 2, 3, and 11 and is referenced
therein.
•· -· ··--...... -----· .. -.. -20-.:..
-
-' . -.
Comment 13:
The proposed construction along Tustin Street is especially sensitive with regard to
traffic circulation. Although Section 3. 7 and Appendix C seem to adequately address
the issues, we must emphasize that very stringent requirements will be placed on the
contractor to minimize his disruption of traffic and adjacent businesses. Under no
circumstances will any construction activity; be allowed on Tustin Street during the . '
months of November and December. :
Response 13:
Comment so noted and incorporated into the final environmental documentation.
Comment M:
Public Utilities Section 3.10 fails to mention three extremely important facilities
which, according to our records, lie within the limits of the planned work.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California operates an 84-inch, maximum
2 50 psi water line in the Tustin Street right of way. Southern California Gas
Company Transmission Division operates a 36-inch high pressure main in the Orange-
Olive Road right of way and a 24-inch high p1•essure main in the Batavia Street right
of way into Lincoln Avenue. Both these gas lines .maintain pressures up to 465 psi.
Response 14:
The locations of the Metropolitan Water District's 84-inch water line in Tustin Street
and the Southern California Gas Company's mains in Batavia Street and Lincoln
Avenue are hereby incorporated into the final EIR. Impacts to these facilities will
be accurately assessed when final routing of the sewer lines are determined. The
mitigation measures listed in Section 3.10, PUBLIC UTILITIES, will be applicable to
these facilities.
-21-
Comment 15:
As a point of information, the City of Orange is in the process of forming a
redevelopment agency project which generally encompasses the Orange Mall and
areas on each side of Tustin Street between Heim Avenue and Katella Avenue. This
project area and its impacts have been discussed with CSDOC previously by our
~.edevelopment agency staff.
i
Response 15:
Comment so noted.
Comment I&:
While the proposed route of the Olive/Taft Sub-Trunk line follows your existing trunk
in the Taft Avenue, Tustin Street, and Meats Avenue rights of way, we would suggest
your consideration of an alignment which' proceeds easterly from Tustin Street along
Taft Avenue, 1, 700 feet to the Southern California Edison right of way, then
northeasterly along this right of way to the intersection of Meats Avenue and
Santiago Boulevard. This route, if feasible, would be 800 feet shorter than that via
Meats Avenue and would avoid the costly crossing of the Route 55 Freeway at Meats
Avenue. This realignment should not adversely impact us as long as the existing
trunk lines is not abandoned.
Response 16:
The suggested route of the Olive/Taft Sub-Trunk is hereby acknowledged and will be
considered in determining the final route of the trunk line.
-22 -
...
-
City of HtDltington Beach
Les Bvans/Bill Patapoff
Undated
(This NOP response was received subsequent to the circulation of the draft EIR.)
Comment 11:
The proposed alignment through Huntington Beach Central Park should be carefully
evaluated for effect on wildlife and native vegetation as well as established
landscaping.
Response il:
A definitive alignment for the leg to Edwards Trunk has not been determined (as with
all of the proposed improvements). Potentially this leg could traverse Huntington
Beach Central Park to Goldenwest and Slater or the leg could be placed in the
surrounding local streets.
Should an alignment be chosen which traverses the Central Park, it would be limited
to the wideveloped area or manicured areas. The alignment would not traverse the
Park's natural area (conversation with Tom Dawes, CSDOC, October 11, 1983).
Impacts to vegetation in the park are therefore expected to be minimal. Upon
completion of construction, revegetation of ornamental landscaping will occur.
Comment 12:
Disruption to Huntington Central Park use during construction should be evaluated as
well as conflict with existing park irrigation and drainage systems.
Response 22:
See Response #1, above. In addition, should a leg of the Edward's Trunk traverse the
City's Park, CSDOC will coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach in order to
minimize potential impacts to the park's irrigation and drainage system.
Construction can also be scheduled to minimize conflict with peak park usage.
However, disruption of park usage is an tmavoidable adverse impact of the project.
-23 -
Comment 13:
The proposed trtmk sewer alignment appears to differ from that adopted by the City
of Huntington Beach in the City Master Plan. These differences should be addressed.
Response 13:
The "Huntington Beach Sewer Master Plan" (July 1979) was utilized in the
preparation of CSDOC Districts 2, 3, and 11 Sewage Collection System Master
Plan. A final route for the Edwards Trtmk-Bluff Line Sewer will be coordinated with
the City of Huntington Beach and a route selected which will best serve the needs of
Huntington Beach and CSDOC.
Comment 14:
Will the lines be sized to serve ultimate master plan development of Huntington
... · Beach?
Response 14:
The Master Plan is based on ultimate land use projections in Districts 2, 3, and 11.
The reader is referred to Chapter 2.0, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, in the EIR.
Comment IS:
Traffic disruption and delays should be addressed. time of year of construction and
impact on beach traffic, Christmas shopping, back to school, etc., should be
considered.
Response 15:
Please refer to Section 3.7, TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, of the EIR. This
section notes that careful consideration will be given to scheduling of construction as
to minimize traffic conflicts at key times of the year.
-24-
-,.
I
'
---
Comment 16:
Dust control in residential areas should be considered.
Response 16:
Please refer to Section 3.8, AIR-QUALITY, of the draft EIR.
Comment 17:
Noise impacts on residential areas should be addressed.
Response 17:
Please refer to Section 3.9, NOISE, of the EIR.
Comment 18:
Possible conflict with the City of Huntington Beach West Boundary Trunk Sewer
should be considered.
Response 18:
Comment so noted; please see Response #3.
-25 -
-Amigos de Bolsa Chica
Lorraine Faber, President
November 2'1, 1983
Comment 11
The Amigos de Bolsa Chica appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft
Environmental Impact Report' County Sanitation Districts of Orange Counf.y
SCH #8308241, Sewage Collection System Master Plan, Districts 2, 3, and 11. As
you probably lmow, the Amigos de Bolsa Chica are very concerned that an
development in the coastal region meets the highest environmental standards. To
achieve this goal, the following comments are provided for your consideration.
Response il
Comment so noted.
Comment #2
It is not clear from this document what kind of wastewater (primary, secondary) will
be carried by the new lines. It is the position of our organization that all wastewater
receive at least minimum secondary treatment. Thus if the new lines are not being
routed to achieve this goal we would be opposed to the project. Additionally,
placement of treatment facilities in the Bolsa Chica lowlands would be equally
unacceptable due to loss of habitat and liquefaction risks during earthquake
occurrance.
Response 12
CSDOC aclmowledges the Amigos comments regarding the desirability of secondary
treatment, however, the project under consideration in this EIR is the expansion of
the wastewater collection system, i.e., the collection of sewage to be treated. The
sewage collection system's ultimate destination is either CSDOC's Regional
Treatment Plant No. 1 ol· No. 2. Sewage receives appropriate treatment at these
plants. There are no plans to place a treatment plant in the Balsa Chica lowlands.
-26 -
-
Comment 13
It is essential that full assessment of the potential risk of environmental damage to
the sensitive wetlands due to line breakage be made. It is our understanding that
Orange County's Environmental Management Agency recently contracted for a study
of earthquake faults in the Bolsa Chica. That report, now due, should be
incorporated into the final EIR .so that realistic assessments of risk factors can be
:,
m~e. 1
Response 13
The referenced geotechnical hazards study was included as Supplement F of the
"Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan Supplementary Information,"
dated December 12, 1983. The supplemental information was approved by the Board
of Supervisors on December 20, 1983. The supplementary information and the Bolsa
Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan are to be submitted to the Coastal
Commission for consideration in early 1984.
The results of the geotechnical hazards study will be considered and incorporated
into the final route selection and design of the Bluff-Line sewer.
Comment 14
If the project is conducted as planned, the mitigation measures listed on pages 24 and
25 should be quite satisfactory to ensure an environmentally acceptable project, with
the following modifications:
The items listed on pages 24 and 25 are recommendations •••••• the document
should provide assurances that in fact these recommendations will be carried
out and the party responsible for this should be identified.
Response 14
These mitigation measures presented on pages 24 and 25 will be carried out as
appropriate. The mitigation measures have been restated below-with the
responsible party identified in paranthesis.
-·
o Construction equipment and spoil material should be confined to existing
road surfaces to the extent possible. Disturbance of vegetation and soil
will be kept to a minimum consistent with good engineering practices
throughout the entire project area, but especially in the
lowlands/wetlands.( CS DOC).
o The surveyed route of the project should be inspected by the California
Department of Fish and Game prior to approval of final engineering plans
(CSDOC and CDF&G).
o Land disturbed by that portion of the trunk sewer traversing the
Huntington Mesa Bluff should be revegetated and the surface soil
stabilized immediately following construction (CSDOC}.
o Adverse impacts to acquatic and estuarine resources resulting from
routing and emergency maintenance activities should be mitigated by the
restoration of these resources to the condition which existed prior to such
activities (CSDOC in cooperation with CDF&G).
o Project construction should be limited to the period August 15 through
December 15 to avoid the breeding season of the Belding's savannah
sparrow and the period of highest use by migratory water birds (CSDOC).
o If the above conditions cannot be met and the project biologist determines
in conjunction with the District during construction that such a measure is
warranted, an appropriate screening should be erected at the edge of the
construction area. (The District should determine the materials for screen
construction and should be able to erect some in a reasonable period of
time, if determined necessary.}
o Daily construction activities should be monitored by a qualified biologist
acting as a representative of the Department of Fish and Game. While the
biologist may be a graduate student, only an official of Department of Fish
and Game should have the authority to request the District's inspector to
suspend or stop any potentially damaging activities caused by the
-28-
Contractor pursuant to contractural authority (CSDOC in cooperation with
CDF&G).
o The design of the Bolsa Chica pump station is such that it includes back up
pumps in the event that a primary pump should fail. This will help ensure
that a s1stem failure will not occur (CSDOC).
Comment 15
The first bullet (page 24) should be expanded to include the following sentence.
Disturbance of vegetation and soil will be kept to a minimum consistent with good
engineering practices throughout the entire project area, but especially in the
vicinity of the lowlands/wetlands.
Response 15
The first bullet on page 24 is hereby expanded to read:
o Construction equipment and spoil material should be confined to existing
road surfaces to the extent possible. Disturbance of vegetation and soil
will be kept to a minimum consistent with good engineering practices
throughout the entire project area, but especially in the vicinity of the
lowland wetlands.
Comment 16
If all the mitigating measures (pages 24 and 25), as modified above, are not carried
out the Amigos de Bolsa Chica would oppose the project.
Response I&
Comment so noted. The reader is also referenced to the responses to the comments
made by the California Department of Fish and Game.
-29 -
Signal Landmark, Inc.
Mel Malkoff
December 12, 1983
(Telephone Conversation)
Comment il
Signali!.-andmark, Inc., has no comment on the draft EIR.
e ,,
•\
1
Response 11
Comment so noted.
-30 -
-
General Corrections to the Text
Page 75, paragraph 2 of the draft EIR is hereby amemded to read as follows:
On July 13, 1983, the Boards of Directors of Districts 2, 3, and 11 adopted
Resolution #83101 approving an agreement with Michael Brandman Associates
for preparation of this Environmental Impact Report for a lump sum price of
$20,000.
-31-
...
<C c: CD
I-E .z E w 0
~o :c -o ca
<C .s
I-C> I-·;::
<C 0
$1 ,re OF CALIFORNI Ai-OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
OFFICE OF RESOURCES, ENERGY. AND PERMIT ASSISTANCE
1 r l TENTH STREET
SJ ~AMENTO, CA ·95814
. November 28, 1983
Mr. Hilary Baker
Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
GEORGE OEUKMEJIAN, Oovt:rnor
~ bject: SCH# 83082411, Sewage Collection System Master Plan Dfstricts 2, 3, & 11·
Dear Mr. Baker:
~e State Clearinghouse sul:mitted the above named draft Environmental L""Tipact Report
(EIR) to selected state agencies for review. The review pericd is closed and t:."le ~
a nts of the individual agency(ies) is(are) attached. If you would like to discuss
t...iei.r concerns and recamr.endations, please contact the staff frcm the appropriate
ageno1 ( ies) •
~ ... en pr~-arii."'lg the final EIR, you must include all ccmme.rits and res~nses (CT.QA
Guideli.:."les, Section 15146) • The certified EIR must be consicered in the decision-
rr"'!ki.~g process for the project. In addition, we urge you to resp:md directly to t."le
c mmenting age.ricy(ies) by writing to then, including the State Cleari.~<;house noti:e:: on
a!.l corres];:Ondence. .
'P. 1981 ~late Court cecisicn in Cleazy v. County of Stanislaus (118 cal. ~E>· 3d
:t:fa) clarified :equir~ents for rest;onding to ceview canment:.s. Sl=Eeifically, the
c~urt indicated that cann:ents n:ust be addressed in detail, giving reasons wey the
s ecific camnent:.s and suggestions were not accepted. T.he res;cnsas must shew fact.ors
dt overriding significance which required the st..."qgestion or ccnm:nt to :e :ejected ..
Res;cnses t:o camrents must not be ccnclusory statenents but must t~ su;r:orted 'cy en-
f .rical or experi..~11tal eata, scie.'lti:tic aut..~ority a~ ex;:lar.ato~1 infocr.aticn 0.: any
~. The court further said :.bat the r:es;onses uiust be a geed fait.'1, reasoned.
analysis.
r. the eve.'lt that the project is approved without adequate mit:..gation of signif:.cant
ef!ect:s, ~he lead agenC'J' tm!St Jake writte.."l findings for eac!l significant ef!ect and i~
~ st su;:t:0rt its ac~icns with a written state.ne..'1~ of overriding considerations for
e-:h unmitigated significant: et:t:ece. (crQA Guicelines sec~ion l.5088 and 1.5089).
I. -the project :squires disc:etionar1 a;:prcval frau any sta-ce agency, t:...~e Ncti~e of
D...;ecti.nad.on must be filed witb ~~ Secreo.cy for Resources, as well as with :..~e
Coun~1 Cler:<. Please com:.ac: Dan Ccnal:"J at ( 916) 445-0613 i! you have any qces'ticns
a· Jut: t:...-ie environmental re-1iew ?recess • ..
Sincerely,
. ,// // -~
_-;/ .. -c., t 1,.r .... 1 u~--c.L<A...C"'J
Terr.r ?.cce:-...s
~--,agar ·/
s 1ce C.aa:ir:cb.cuse ... ..
oiilUIUI VT "'-~HITliJrnu::1 ' . The Resources Agency
. , \emorandum ..
T : l. Projects Coordinator
Resources Agency
2. County Sanitation Districts
oft 0 ra.nge County
P. O. Box 8126
?ountain Va.U..ey, CA 92708
Date !fovecber 2;, 1983
Mm Department of Fish and Game
.s..)iect: Draft EIR on Orange County-Sanitation Districts Master Plan of Sevage
Collection Districts 2~ 3 a.mi ll, Orange County, SCH 83082411
-
We have reviewed the subject draft EIR for assessing potential environmental
impacts from sevage collection within a study area genera.l.ly ~ncompassing the
northwest portion of Orange County.
We have no comments regarding the EIR's discussion of the proposed actions in
Districts 2 and 3. Ho~ever, the proposed action in District 11 is of direct
concern to the Department as significant adverse impacts could occur to fish
and ~ildlife resources and those impacts have not been adequately addressed in
the document. We believe that an accurate description of the project site
within the Bolsa Chica lowlands, specific site iI:Ipacts, and positive ~itigation
proposals must be contained ~~ the document.
We cite the :ollcving inadequacies of the Document in presenting the existing
natural ~ildlife resou~ces, the projected impacts, and compensatory measures.
1. Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~easures (Page 3).
Landform/Soils/Geology
Grading ordinances have not proven adequate L~ protecting ~etlands and
their endemic resources.
Biology
The mentioned time restriction of construction vill not prevent
detrimental impacts upon the fish and vildlife resources. Resources
other than the listed sparrow and migratory species should be
considered.
2. Page 10. Table l. The be.sis for the 3 mgd additional flov at Bolsa Chica
requires substantiation.
3. ~xhibit 3. The proposed system deficiencies are inadequately described.to
permit an adequate evaluation. we recommend the County plan to avoid the
valuable vetlands of Bolsa Chica altogether, especially because less
enviror.mental.l.;r damaging, feasible alternatives exist.
-2-
4. Mitigation Measure 2. ?a.ge 20. The use of gasketed joints vill minimze
possibl~ infiltration of perched groundvater to the severage system. A
comparable assess~ent should be provided to determine i! ga.sketed joints
vill eliminate sewerage L~~iltration L~to the groundwater and vetlands.
5. Page 21. District ll. It does not appear that the proposed project vould
actua.J.ly "skirt'' the southern edge of the Bolsa Chica. lowlands. It the
route is at the base of the Huntington Bea.ch Bluffs (as described in the
third paragraph) , then it does not sk~rt the edge, but i.s within them. The
pump station loca~ion and the sever l~ne should be kept ~ut of the
wetlands.
6. Page 22. We do not concur vith the conclusions contained in the first
three para.graphs. The referenced disturbed areas, unvegetatei areas and
vegetated areas are inadequateJ.7 presented. The suggested non•vildlife
areas or those of little use are exaggerated. We reference the DFG
document "Determination of the Status of the Bolsa. Chica Wetlands" dated
December ll, 1981.
7. Page 23. District 11 -Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4. The Belding's savannah
sparro~ is an endangered species.
Previous experience indicates the 30-~oot 'W'l.ae construction corridor is
less than that actually used for construction activities. A more accurate
corridor vidth should be presented.
The removal of any marsh habitat must be avo~ded or adequately mitigated,
yet this is not discussed in the document. Unless the cc.nstruction is
vi thin existing roadvays, ve believe significant ba.bi tat 1destruct ion vould
occur. We believe the use of even existing road ways for'' sever li!le
construction would undesirably restrict; our options for r1 ~storing the Bolsa
vetlands.
The November through March ti~e period is inadequate and resident species
a.re not adequately considered.
8. Soils are generally salt-saturated; details of the proposed revegetation
should be provided to explain how it vill be accomplished. The proposed
August 15 through December 15 construction period may a.void many conflicts
~ith the Belding's savannah sparrov but does not a.void the many-impacts upon
the migratory species as stated.
The potential of pump failure causing se~age spills and those capable of
the backt~p system should be described in the docu..~ent.
We do not concur that the suggested mitigation measures are adequate in
maintaining the fish and w-ildlife resources· of the Bolsa Ga~.
...
-3-
9. ?age 66, Alterna.-tives: W~ vould prefer either the Mo Proje~t or the
Paralleling Lines alternative as neither alternative vould produce adverse
im.r>acts vithin District ll.
10. Page 68: The fish and wildlife resour~es should be identified in the
consideration of the short-term and long-term relationships.
11. Page 69. Fish and vildl.ife losses caused by habitat destruction should be
described as significant irreversible changes, unless all losses are
avoided or impacts are mitigated to a level of' non-significance.
12. Page 71. Impacts to biological resources other than Belding's savannah,
sparrow are not identified in the Biology section. Due to the lack of a
complete biological assess~ent we believe this section i~ inade~ua~e.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you
have al'lY" questions please contact Fred A. Worthley Jr., Regional Manage~, Region
5, 245 West Broadway, Suite 350, Long Beach, qalifornia 90802; telephone (213)
590-5113.
:t ·. . ::· -. ... t· '/-·-·'~'"'--··-. .. -t·--....
j-1-·'-Director
I/
._.
State of California Resources Agency of California
.l\..emorandum
Tc:
ts:/
-
Or. Gordon Snow
Assistant Secretary for Resources
The Resource~ Agency
1416 Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dene: November 10, 1983
Prom California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region
6809 INOIANA AVENUE. SUITE 200, RIVERSICE. CA 92506 8-632-4130
su'tiect: DEIR: Master Plan of Sewage. Collection, Districts 2,3 and 11; SCH# 83082411
We have reviewed this Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and wish to
offer the following comments.
1. The DEIR identifies potential erosion and siltation impacts during
construction of the sewage facilities and notes, appropriately, that
such impacts warrant particular concern in the Bolsa Chica area. While
the summary of environmental impacts and mitigation measures indicates
that erosion control measures will be im~lemented (9.3), these Measures
are not specified in the mitigation proposed for hydrological imoacts
(p.20). The EIR should state that an erosion-siltation control plan
for a11 phases of construction must be submitted for approval by this
office prior to the commencement of any construction activities.
2. The Regional Board is concerned about the project's potential impact
on the quality of wastewater treated and disposed of by the Regional
Plants. The quality of sewered wastewaters may affect the quality
of the Regional Plant discharges; any degradation of these discharges
may result in subsequent negative impacts on ocean, surface or ground
waters.
The DEiR finds that, since the project involves no diversion or change
in the patterns of wastewater flows in Districts 2,3 and 11, no deoradation
of wastewater quality will occur (p.18). This conclusion, however: ignores
. the possible impacts which changes in the amount and/or type of flows within
the Districts may have on the quality of the wastewaters treated and disposed
of. These potential impacts should be evaluated; subsequent impacts on
effluent receiving waters should also be addressed. This assessment should
include the collective imoacts of the several collection system ex9ansion
projects currently proposed by CSDOC (this project; Updated and Consolidated
Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for ~istricts No. 1, the Northern Half cf
District No. 6 ar.d District No. 7; County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation).
oorn~~n~?rnrn
' NOV 1 8 1983
Or. Gordon Snow -2-November 10, 1983
3. The EIR should assess the impacts of ultimate project flows on treatment
plant capacities. This assessment shouid include the cumulative impacts
oi the comoined ultimate flows projected by the several collection system
expansion programs now under consideration.
We look forward to.review of the Finai EIR when it becomes available.
If there are any questions concerning these comments, please contact this
office.
~~-~-
Joanne E. Schneider
Environmental Specialist
.-JES:kyb
-
,.J!-Y< >R
R. W. lukrmbour1i11•r
v1nMAYOR
Odniel E. ~ri~ttl
OUNCILMEMBER5
..John Acosttl
Cordon Bncken
P. lee Johnson
Pamc1a A. McGu1gan
'Dan Young ... CITY OF SANT A ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA • P.O BOX 1988
SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702
Al L·Ar\.tfRICA CITY 1 1 ~H.Hi'
l 11 Y t\. \ANA< ,f fl:
A I \V1l!>c1n
l ll't Al JO~Nl't'
Edw.ud I. Couper
ClEl<K Ot-TH~ (OUN<. II
I.mac ~ C C.u\
November 16, 1983 RECEIVED NOV Z 3 1983
-
Hilary J. Baker
Senior Engineering Aide
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
SUBJECT: EIR, MASTER PLAN OF SEWAGE COLLECTION,
DISTRICTS 2, 3 AND 11
Dear Ms. Baker :
Per your letter of October 13, 1983, regarding the above
subject, we reviewed the draft EIR. Mr. Walter D. Schraub's
comments in his letter dated August 19, 1983, as contained
in the Appendix A, satisfy the concern of the City of Santa
Ana.
The City has no further comment.
Very truly yours,
o.~a_ ~-~
c. Stephen Bucknam, Jr.
Senior Civil Engineer
CSB/AE/dg
-
-
city of orange Incorporated ·1 aee
department of public works
engineering division
orange civic center • 300 east chapman avenue • orange, california 92666
post office box 449
(714) 532 0444
November 18, 1983
I Ms. Hilary J. Baker
Senior Engineering Aide
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Co11UDents on Draft Environmental Impact Report, Master Plan of Sewage
Collection, Districts No. 2, 3 & 11, SCH No. 83082411
Dear Ms. Baker:
The subject draft EIR discusses upgraded trunk facilities to be constructed along
Lincoln Avenue, Taft Avenue, Tustin Street, and Meats Avenue in the City of Orange.
Since we are currently budgeted and preparing to bid street reconstruction pro-
jects over the entire length of your planned work in Taft and Meats Avenues, we
would like to coordinate, or possibly merge, our separate contracts if our con-
struction dates are coincident. For your additional planning information, we soon
will be submitting a street reconstruction project for County AHFP participation
along Lincoln Avenue, which, if approved, will be ready for contruction by Spring
1985. Once a street is resurfaced, we allow no cuts, except for emergency work,
for a minimum of three years.
Although no mention was made in the Bibliography (Section 11.0), we trust that
your master plan was prepared with consideration of our January 1982 Master Plan
of Sewers prepared by Willdan Associates and forwarded to you on March 11, 1982.
The land use map contained therein is essentially current for the purposes of your
study.
The proposed construction along Tustin Street is especially sensitive with regard
to traffic circulation. Although Section 3.7 and Appendix C seem to adequately
address the issues, we must emphasize that very stringent requirements will be
placed on the contractor to minimize his disrup~ion of traffic and adjacent
businesses. Under no circumstances will any construction activity be allowed on
Tustin Street during the months of November and December.
Public Utilities Section 3.10 fails to mention three extremely important facilities
which, according to our records, lie within the limits of the planned work. Met-
ropolitan Water District of Southern California operates an 84", maximum 250 psi
water line in the Tustin Street right of way. Southern California Gas Company
-
-
...
...
Ms. Hilary Baker
November 18, 1983
Page 2
Transmission Division operates a 36" high pressure main in the Orange~Olive Road
right of way and a 24" high pressure main in the Batavia Street right of way into
Lincoln Avenue. Both these gas lines maintain pressures up to 465 psi.
As a point of information, the City of Orange is in 'the process of forming a
redevelopment agency project which generally encompasses the Orange Mall and areas
on each side of Tustin Street between Heim Avenue and Katella Avenue. This
project area and its impacts have been discussed with CSDOC previously by our
redevelopment agency staff.
While the proposed route of the Olive/Taft Sub-Trun..~ line follows your existing
trunk in the Taft Avenue, Tustin Street and Meats Avenue rights of way, we would
suggest your consideration of an alignment which proceeds easterly from Tustin
Street along Taft Avenue, 1700 feet to the Southern California Edison right of
way, then northeasterly along this right of way to the intersection of Meats
Avenue and Santiago Boulevard. This route, if feasible, would be 800 feet shorter
than that via Meats Avenue and would avoid the costly crossing of the Route 55
Freeway at Meats Avenue. This realignment should not adversely impact us as
long as the existing trunk line is not abandoned.
Yours very truly,
.. r;k?--dd~~
._. , Robert F. Beardsley, P.~
Assistant City Engineer/Superintendent of Streets
RFB:dr
cc: Frank V. Page
Gary D. John~on
• Helmut Stolpp
Dennis Krejci
-
C I T Y 0 F BUEN A P A R K
c A L F 0 R N A 9 0 6 2 2
6650 BEACH BOULEVARD, P.O.BOX 5009, PHONE: ARE.A CODE (714) 521-9900
~
DEPT. OF Pl.ANNING AND BUil.DiNG
PATRICK D. BROWN, Director
-
-
October 11, 1983
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
ATTN: Hilary Baker
RECEIVED OCT 2 7 1983
.. RE: Response to Notice of Preparation for Sewer Collection
-
-
System Master Plan
Dear Ms. Baker:
We believe the response from Mr. Carlos M. Jocson on the subject adequately
identifies the City's concerns rega~ding the project. Said letter dated
September 9, 1983, is attached for your review.
Should you require additional information regarding this subject please
contact Mr. Jocson.
Yours truly,
Patrick D. Brown, Director of
Planning and Community Develo
~/A~
by: Kenneth W. Griffith
Senior Planner
Attachment
cc: Carlos M. Jocson, Assistant Civil Enginner, Engineering Services
-
-
. EXHIBIT II.
NOTICE OF PREPARATION RESPONSE FORM
This form is provided to assist in responding to the Notice
of Preparation. If more s~ace is required or if you prefer
• a different format, pleas~ feel free to deviate from this form
as necessary. If you have input, please complete tne form
and return;. otherwise, it will be assurn~d that you do not wish
to be retained on the distribution list to receive the Draft
EIR.
Aqency City of Huntington Beach
Mailing Address 2000 Main Street ---------------------------------------------------
City Huntington Beach State CA · z·ip 92648 ·
Telephone ( 114 ) 536-5431
., Contact Person I.es Evans/Bill Pata.p:>ff
-
LEVEL OF INTEREST IN TH.E PROPOSED FACILITIES.
D
D
[!]
No interest (delete from distribution list)
Minor interest (retain name on distribution list)
Major interest (state key areas of your concern):
1. Aligmrent of sewer trunks th:r:ough park and streets · ---
2. Traffic inp!cts of constructiqn activities
3. Utility.conflicts
4 •. Noise and dust
PERMIT/REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
Do you or your agency have statutory peJ:'Itlit authority or
advisory review authority over actions within the PROJECT
ARE.A. If so, please-list. ·
Applicability Within
Area of Concern Authority Project Area
General Plan Confo:cmity . planning Ccnmi.ssion Alignneit of trunk lines
Street cut t=el::rnits Public ~rks Dept. ExcaVations in public rights of way
-
-
-
-
-
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE C..~TEGORIES
.. -----·-Please indicate your interests and items that should be -·-·-----·--..
addressed in the proposed EIR.
· .. Category Comments
GEOLOGY/SOILS ,
HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY
VEGETATION/WILDLIFE
The proposed alignment through Hmltin9ton Bea.ch Central Park should l:e carefully
evaluated.for effect on wildlife and native vegetation as well as established
landscap:ing.
ARCHAEOLOGY/HISTORY
EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES
Disruptioo to Huntington Central Park use during construction should l::e evaluated
as well as conflict with existing park irrigation and drainage systems.
RELEVANT LAND USE PLANNING
The proposed trunk sewer alignIISlt ag:ears to differ fran that adopted by the
City of Huntington Beach in the City Master Plan. These differences should l:e
. addressed.
DEMOGRAPHY AND GROWTH DYNAMICS
Will the lines 1::e sized to serve ultimate master plan devel~t ·.of Huntington
Beach.
TR&~SPORTATION/CIRCULATION
Traffic disruption and delays should be addressed. T:ine of year of ccnstruction
and ~ on beach traffic, Christmas shopping, back to schccl, etc.· should
be considered.
. ,
-
--.
-
cateqorz
CLIMATE/AIR QUALITY
Dust control·in residential areas should be oonsidered.
NOISE
Impacts ai residential ~ should l:e addressed.·
UTILITIES
-.
Comments
Possible conflict With the City of Huntington Eeach West Eoundaxy 'liunk
~ should l:e considered.
ENERGY CONSERVATION
...
.•
-
-· ..
....
-
-
-
-
-
.. ,
•
September 9, 1983
~
I Ms. Kimberly Grant, Project Manager
Michael Brandman & Associates, Inc~·
18012 Sky Park Circle, Suite .E-2 r·
Irvine, CA 92714 . ·
Subject: EIR for County Sanitation Of strict of Orange County Proposed.
Improvements fgr Di.stricts 2, 3 and 11 ·
Dear r.ts •. f{ili1.berly: ·
. .
..
Pursuant to your request dated August 24, 1983, the following information is
provided ~lative to the CSDOC's proposed improvements within the City of
Buena Park. ·
The proposed improvements involving the installation of 8", 21" and 24" sewer
relief lines \'/ill be done along Orangethorpe Avenue, a major highway; along
Crescent A'1enue and Artesia Boulevard, both secondary highways and along Beach
Boulevard, a State highway. These roads are currently paved with-asphaltic
concrete of thicknesses varying from 311 to approxin:ately 15" over aggregate
base subgrade. It is suggested that pavemant replacement be carried up to
existing traffic delin~ations and shall be of a thic.kr'tass of equal or greater
than existing.
We belie'le that during construction, there will be substantial change in existing
traffic conditions involving motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians, as well
as increases in existing noise, dust and vibration levels. Impact upon our
existing underground uti1 ities within the 1 imits of construction \'/il 1 be dependent
upon tha vart1cal and horizontal alighrnent of the proposed improvements.
Copies of our water and sewer base maps are fontarded for your reference. Please
do not hesitate to call if you have a~y questions or need additional info?TJ!tion.
Yours vary truly,
Donald K. Jensen
Assistant City Engineer
-~.
Carlos M. Jocson
Assistant Civil Engineer
DKJ : CHJ:: 1 m
Attachl!lents
...
-
-
-
-
Michael Brandman & Assoc.
18021 Skypark Circle, Ste. E-2
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: Kimberly Brandt
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA I g~s I COMPANY
ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION • P. 0. BOX 3334, ANAHEIM. CALIF. 92803
August 19, 1983
Subject: EIR Orange County Sanitation Districts 2,3 and 11.
This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual conunitment to
serve the proposed project, but only as an information service. Its
intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has
facilities in the area where the above-named project is proposed.
Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main as
shown on the attached atlas sheet without any significant impact on
the environment. The service would be in accordance with the
Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California
Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are
made.
The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter,
is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory
policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is
under the jurisdiction of the Califonria Public Utilities Commission.
We can also be affected by actions of gas supply or the condition
under which service is available, gas service will be provided in
accordance with revised conditions.
Estimates of gas usage for non-residential projects are developed on
an individual basis and are obtained from the Commercial-Industrial
Market Services Staff by calling (714)634-3173.
We have developed several programs which are available, upon request,
to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of
• energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you
desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs,
please contact this office for assistance.
-
-
-DH/du
enclosures
Sincerely,
·-,, . IJ} ,'. /'f I) · / ·.:.. ~ C L t 1~
D.M. Glover
Technical Supervisor
-amigos
11 h.da Balsa
" 1ca
RECEIVED DEC 1 1983
P.O. BOX 1563 .HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 • (714) 897·7003
-
-
-
-
Hilary J. Baker
County Sanitation Districts
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Hilary Baker:
November 21, 1983
The Alnigos de Bolsa Chica appreciates the opportunity to comment on the
draft Environmental Impact Report, County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County SCH ffe830824l, Sewage Collection System Master Plan, Districts 2,3,
and 11. As you probably know, the Amigos de Bolsa Chica are very concerned
that all development in the coastal region meets the highest environmental
standards. To achieve this goal the following comments are provided for your
consideration.
It is not clear from this document what kind of wastewater (primary, secondary)
... will be carried by the new lines. !t is the position of our organization that
all wastewater receive at least minimum secondary treatment. Thus if the new
lines are not being routed to achieve this goal we would be opposed to the
project. Additionally placement of treatment facilities in the Bolsa Chica
lowlands would be equally unacceptable due to loss of habitat and liquifaction
risks during earthquake occurance.
It is essential that full assessment of the potential risk of environmental
damage to the sensitive wetlands due to line breaka.~e be made. It is our
understanding that Orange County's Environmental Management Agency recently
.. contracted for a study of earthquake faults in the Bolsa Chica. That report,
now due, should be incorporated into the final EIR so that realistic assessments
of risk factors can be made.
...
-
If the project is conducted as planned the mitigation measures listed on page 24
and 25 should be quite satisfactory to ensure an environmentally acceptable
project, with the following modifications:
l. The items listed on Pages 24 and 25 are recommendations ..... .
the document should provide assurances that in fact these
recommendations will be carried out and the party responsible
for this should be identified .
...
..
-
-
-
...
-
2. The first bullet (page 24) should be e..~panded to include
the following sentence. Disturbance of vegetation and soil
will be kept to a minimum consist.eat with good enginee-ring
practices th-roughout the entire project area, but especially
in the vicinity of the lowlands/wetlands.
If all the mitigating measures (page 24 &25), as modified above, are not
carried out the Amigos de Bolsa Chica would oppose the project.
We look forward to reviewing the final Environmental Impact Report and hope
that you will continue to solicit our coaments in the future as they may
pertain to projects related to coastal development.
Sincerely,
.Xe-~~ ~cd,._.£...:..·.-,.;,...._ ___ _
Lorraine Faber
P-resident, Amigos de Bolsa Chica
...
RESOLUTIONS ·AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FEBRUARY· 8, 1984 -7:30 P.M.
.. ( ( (
::::
.1.:t==f UNO NO
I I
I-'
Q1~9 -Jl OIST lHRKJNG CAPITA~ · · · -· PROCESSING DA-T~· l/£16/8't-PMlf:-·-···1"··-----,·-·--:-··
REPORT NUMBER AP't3
:::: COUNlY SANITAllON DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY .
. -·· ·----· ·-··--·----·· ____ : ·· (;U IHS-·P.A IO-O l / 11-/B't·-····-·--·--··---· -· ------··-··
WARRANT NO. VE NOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
067185 A~Af.O £1..£CTROl'HCS SHES . $66.51 U.ECTRICAL SUppLeO
061l8f> ABC LUHBEP CORP. ' ~'tt986.2't LUt1BER
-·· ---06·1·187-·--·-···--··---·-·A lR·-H·L-J F-CR~I A----------· .. -·-.. ------····--·------------------··--$1·78·· 00----------A I R--f ARf ~--·VAR I ous-·ttff"l'-1 NG·s·
1
" 067188 AIR FROOUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC. U'lil.58 SPECIALTY GASES '
·. ~ ·J··: .. --:1
·• 4 -. ~ .
'·.·
.... '"
II
u ----.....
II
:: --·--· ~:~ ! :: .. ---·---. · .... :~~·-• ~~~~~~~. t/ c~ ~-~-~-~~.-AL·~-~-·-~-~.--·---· .. -·-····-------·-.. ·---·· -·-·---::::.; i;---·~--~----·· ~-~~~~=-~ c~~~;~~~~_-,.~~--. ._·· · ·· -.-.·-:-~--~-'"T7"-:---~~1:~
u Of,1191 /lMEl(ICAN SCJ~NllflC PRODUCTS . $~6't.OO · J.AP $UPPJ.ln ' .. ,': .· . .': :~. -. .· ... · · '. '. ·-.. · (. 1•
.. o 6 71 % AN AH El H s EWER Co~ S TR UC T H> N $ ~ , 2 5 ~ • P ~ . C S DO(: # 11 RH A I R ~ .· ," < ••·.1 .-.• • : ·: " . • ." .• .:.· , • : "~06-7l-9l--------1H£--ANGHOA·-PHK·lNG-GG-.---·----·-$h~5t-.-8 PUHP-PARTS-. . ·-. . . . . .. ·
" m 06719" AQUA BEN COfi.P. $28,318.76 CHEHICAL COAGULENTS 11 ~ 067195 ARROl.l-RISCO, INC. $365.'19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
" t::::2 .. u6-l1% ·---.... ----aAKE~ ··Hnc;oo . .-;o.-,----rnc-,--------------------,--.. ~93, H--·---~---~ sHAt.:t:-Ml\DWAfl~--.: : • · -~ ~-. ---:·
•• J:> 067197 BANt< Of At'ERJCA ~T i SA U,}3'1.63 TRAVH EXPEtiHS .. ·. . .
II ........ 0671'}8 BECKHA~ INSTRUt\PHS Jh~39, 7~ HECTRICl\L sur~PH. ... . 1·. ~· :.: .. · • ."i
--f-06-7199--------·BEH-P..l·Pf-&-·SUPPL-V-ff-·2/t·..-3-8 P"l"PE-SUPPL-1·ES ._..__
II
)'
11: ,.
"'
I ~ ~ • ~ ·:, : ... . I"
--"'"-' •• 11
" rT1 fJ672ilO eEVCO $938.H6 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
n ~ O O 2 01 B I G BO X RENTAL CG • $1 t 2 7 5 • 0 0 TRASH 0 I SP 0 SA l 1;• '~ ::i:t:: .. 06·lf!02··-····--· ·-·------BJRf'qNG·H~-Ot:V~l.·~rMEttt---·-.. -·~-------·····'t·t"'3·,e.9------plAN·-e~ECK···ov~R--P~r@~1f----:--. -. ~.--·--·-------.-. ;--J:
1. CO 0(>7203 60f:HS AJA CONDITIONING $13~,ll4) TRUCK REPAfij~ . . · . .. !" )~ " H.72()q BUENA PARK 1-UftfH~R J HA~DWARf:. . i861f,7l LUMBER"'' . ~ -" ··.·, , . ,. . . .... ·.·~
" _J.:. ___ ·O& 12 05-· THE-8URKr-·e-9KPAN~ . ---S2't ~-··t-ta------p I pf-·SUPPL I Es--~,
14 .l> 0672uE BURKE ENGI~HRING CO. Slt2't.51t ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ,,
a i--067207 BUSINESS FUOLJSHERS INC. t2H.'t0 SUBSCRIPTION n
• I ~ • F··-· 0612us -·--... ----·· i;u11.:~R-·DEYEL·OPKE.tH-GP·---. ------. ----------------ut;i~,2~ Pl:AN· cH~~~-ov~f\·~p~ros-n----~-:-11 ~ t::::t C67209 C: ~ ~ RECONDIHOHJN(J co, $f»50,00 f~Hir REPAIRS . ·: ,_. · "
06721') C~ COMPANY $5~1!21 .. :. VA~VES . . ·., , .. · ; .
in --06:,2-H----~Al:-l·F·r--As-s-ee-1-A-l-!-eN-&F-PUBL 1 e H~s.oo s·EH·1·N·AR-RfG1·S-T1tA1'-t-oN1-...;...._-,.;.;· ;..:.· ___ ......._-=--------..;...o_--1
JI .:-1 Of. 7 212 CALOL YHf-J C GLOVE & SAFE TY $9'1. 86 SAFETY SUPPLIES '~ :;o 067213 CARHENilA FORD TRUCK SALESt IN Ut219.'t9 TRUCK PARTS )I,~ • 0672l't ----·-··· ····-.. ·· JOUN···GASON··-··-·· --· .. ·--··---.. -·-···---·-··-----·-----·-. ·~·~$38·3,83----·-:---·fNG INf:-Pl\RH·· ·-----.-:-: . ·· ~I~ 0~7215 HtEVR9N "·~·"·· !NC. . . . . f~t858.03 ENGINe::o1L . . ' , :,-·.. . · ..
... I'/) 0672lfl CHICO GAME fl~tt fARH . . . $6~,oo . I.AP SPECIHUiS ...... : .. ·i. .._ ... · .,.·
J'J o~ n1.. ·R-.-B-.-·GL-AP.11-C-O·.-,·-lN·E-.-t-&s.-e ftf·eTR·1-e-AriUPPt11! ' . . ' ' .
ID G67~18 CLARK DYE HAROMARE $81.13 SHALL HARDWARE
067219 COHPUTJQU( CO. !211.95 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
0 p 7 2 2 P··----. ·-... CONNELL -c UE y R O~·E.{----.-----------. --~-~·• 1-,·H6·,-3't . T RU C-K.-·PA R rs-.-.-... -.-.--~ .. ·-;·,..-.... -: ,,-........ ,· .. · ..... , .. ~~ .. ,-.. -. _-,' _-, .. -......... __ ,_.-, -. , -.1._ '.;" . '-·: ..
0~722l CONSOL1CAHO-E~ECTRICAL OJST, $6128,9,56 ELECTRICAL. sur.P~tn .· i-.:: 7. ~.;'..:>_:~ . .-·: ~J::· ... ·:.~·::· : .. · .....
067222 CONUNt:NHL Al~ TOO'"-S' 'NC! ,~,Q?c.1,2, TOOLS. . . ... :~:.":; ·:··-:.·.: .-,:. '.. · . ._ -.:.': :·: .. , ..
-tl6-122~ GON-t-INE·N·l-H~HE-H-l-€AL CO i~-.~-t-8-~50 CHt'O-R1"NE . . .. . . .. . .. ' . . .
0
1:.
., Oc722't COU~TYARO ASSOCIATrs & $613.70 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
o o 1n5 o "r • 1 N c. $ 8 H • 13 e NG 1 Ne PART s --1
&6 7226··----·-------··-DARROW·· (;ORP ~-------------r~·----·-----· ·-. ---, ,-.---.. ~. '.~h·H6·.--29-:-".'-. ftt:Atf""(:ftEC,~~QHl\77HPO'iTT77··(·'···;·"'' ,·.i·.'i /,'. .;·:_::.~::--_~-' ·:~-,:.,·-:~-•\I
061227 . PECO •. .. . . . . . . ,~~(u't1-.· . HECTl\l~M-~urr~us:-.,;::;.,~.<.:·.·\1 .:.:,;:::_\~.:::'-·~·:<>-. ·:.:_:··; ·~_:: .·· ....
0~122a DEl-Ptil svsTEHs, me, · ·· · · · t-6~,go'-~ .... :.HINl·tQHP.\JHR ~\IP.P.QRl .. HftV· ~~1~:;::'-,i.;·;,_.·,..~,.-._:',:\.'..'<;·_;·. ..,
06-12·2 -e+M-l-Al:-E-&U-J-PftEtH-E-&R ~.15 . Of'F1-C-rsup-p-"'
067230 DISPOSABLE LIASTE SYST[HS1. INC. $909.37 PIPE SUPPLIES 1
:•:1
I.I
1<ol
Ill
'II
~~ -·-.-. ------~·-----.-~.----.-.-.-----... -·
~'~--------1-t ...
t. -~ .... . ': .. ?;x:}-t:;;::,: '.i{')l:ri:!'-'}:: ';T:.·.: ... ,t, ~: !
•
~·
.;:: fUNP NC-· -til~e .. JT PJST WCRl<~f\G ·GAf-HAt.--------······-······-·--······--·-··· ··---·· ---·-·-· ····-· ····--f'ROH·SSlNG···OAiE· -l·I06/8't-PAG~--~---------~
REPORT NUHBEP AP~3 .
.. -,.
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRlCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
4
"'-·------·---··--·----···----------------E-l:A-IHS-PA-IO-·!l-l-IH·l-6-'t· ---·---------------------
LJI. UARRANT ~O. V£NOOR AMOUNT DES CR J PTI ON __ .. __ ..... _ ·······-~-·--· ... _ .. ---·-· --·---·---------.. -·-···-··--···------------·--------·----.. ---.. ---------·-----~---·-----. -~,...----------·---·-·-----~"'!"'-. -------·
II
0f>7231 OOU(>LAS-CROW, IRVIN( $1 9 753.60 PJ.M CHECK OV~f\.,Q~POSq. -·:
06 7232 DUNN f:O~ARP$ CORP. $183 d ~ PA ttn ~UPP'-In ;::,' .. ;
--06-123l-------rnc.o. ·--$'t-4-fh53------fNG I NE-PARTS. ·--------------
10
------·'' I)
06723't £ASTMAN, 1r..:c. u,091.92 · OFFICE SUPPLIES • I"
"j--·-··· g: ~~~=-·--··· ·-·-·--· ~;~;~!~-\~;:~f;!--~~=~-~!._____ -----------·-····-:. :~:~~--------~-----~~r-~v~~-~~-~~-~~-' ~~-----~-·::-·--,--·-::-·---······:--·-----.-~:;
" 067237 f JLT£R SUPPLY CO, $4l,57 ~~GIHE PARTS .
" 06123a f Jsc~ER ' PORTER co, • $709,53 r•~~ svPr~I~$ :
II
-O i:n.Je. ---c-J-l-V--O-~ji..GU"' l-A·IH--V·Prl·l:E v H 3" .-a~-----WATE R-u s E AGE ,.
06724~ fHOST [hGlhEfRING SERVICES CO. $128.19 VALVES n
.,,.,, 0672'61 GENERAL flECTIUC SUPPLY $19'6.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ::
--· 061243 ---· ---· -----GEtJ[RAt---HLHMONl-~-0,----------------···-··--·-·f.619.JO---·· --------·TElEPHONJ; ···-------. -.--------, --.....,.------···----·-------. ,..,,
067;!'f3 UERTZ CAR LEASH~~ $327,5li VEtilCLE L~AH ... : ·· . >J 0672~'f RULON HODGES : 'Jt93'f.9'f PLAN CHECK OVE~-DEPO~lT .~ . ~
.06-l24S--. P-.$~--U.UGWES-Co .•. ,-J~ usa-•. or,. PA-INT-SU~PU ES . --···-·-·--~·
0~72't~ ROONEY hUhT CO. i6,ll'f e08 PIPE SUPPLIES
.-0672"7 HURLEY ELECTRONICS, INC. $127.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ::~--~m;:--------mi:~~b~,-c·::;m -~~. ~----:::~i!:H __________ mHHt:~~--~~---~---~--~~---=--1~
h--OD-72 .. 1 INOUS-TR-l-AL-12R-OC~ ·t-.·3't-~.-32-------TOOL-REPA I-RS
11
u 067252 INMAC SlOl.48 COHPUTER SUPPLIES ~
M
II
067253 INTEROX AHEPICA Slt207.4't HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, TANK RENTAL lt
-------&><:. 125,.. -·-· ·-----P·HtJ:·-IRV-I-rH CP·---·-·---------~-----------_,-·H·• 02-s. 51-----t?LAN--c.tt~c K-ov.~A=-P~-~os H--..,.. _ ". ---... -.. ·----··-·-----11.
067255 IRVl~E 1NCUSTR1AL COMPL£X . $llt988,'t5 PLA~ CHECK OV~R-P~PQ$1T 11
067~56 lf<VJNE fCANCH \IAH~ OISTRJP s~,~O WATER USEME ... ,c. ., :~
J=l..--06-72-5-1-----JUl-IAN-CONs+RUG-l-1-0 h&06-.·8 PL-AN--C-HE-C-K-:-OVEft.,.Df.flOS t.:.1---------------1
067256 KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $38.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES
067259 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CO. S92.75 TOOLS
.. Ot 72f.CI --... ·-······-KEENAN f-Jf.E -i· SUHl.-Y--(:0-,----------------u-.u~9.6't-------Pt-P-f-$UPl!L-lfS--··--. . . ----------.---·---··--
0672c• KEITH & ASSOCJATES J4,000.0Q PRE~IHINARY P~$1GN Qf LO~ ALA"fTOS TR~N~H ~EPAIR~
067262 KING BEARING, lNC. $611.09 BEARING SUPPLtf$ .
--6£.l263-----·K-IM-l~MP-&-:14ACM-l-NE-lilORKS 86&.96 UMP--PARTS---·------'-----'---'-----------1
ij67~~4 KLEEN-LINE CORP Sl37.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
067265 THE KOLL CCHFANY $2 1 361.8~ PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
. Ot. 726f. ---....... -··· L.e, w,~ ... , -INC, .. _ ... ·--·----------·----·-------~920.·1&-----------Wf;LD tNG-SUPPL HS-·-··--.-------·
•o
" ~\'
41
---·-----··-;_-,.: IU ,,
'
)
067267 M.E. L~ FORCE co. ~153.9q P~AN CHECK OV£R-D~PQ$f T.
06726A . LAURS(N COLOR. LAB $1t4~10 flLti PROCE$SING . .... "": .... " : ... · "1\sl 1
06.1.2 69-----------LEMON..-ll.E.l-Gli.l S-DE.\f .• ------------------S·h·n9 •. u PLAN-(HEC K-OVE R-DE POS-1-l . . .... ' ·'4 .. •Gf.121~ LIGhTl~G CJSTRIBUTORS, INC. $1)6.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
in -· · ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ·· · · ·• · .~~~ft: N_: ~.~ ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~: ~ ~ ~ -·~·----··-····-·-· --~-----·-----· ! ~;.~!~ o: ~ 6------··· -·---~ ~ :: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..-~ • 1 Q ·' A-,-·a ·Hr-3. .. , 4..-l-rl ~a ~~h-~~ 1. ~~-:~l~ 1
06 7273 HARVAC HECTRQNICS .· $1t9.06 .. ELECTRICAL SUPf'LH~ · · ·.. · . ·· . . .
u
, 06121~ MATT -cHLoR, 1Nc. $2~119.35 rtPE s~PPLIE~ · · ..
'ul---.0.61215--t!CGa.AU-=-UJ-Ll. .. -~uBL..JC.~-NS--C-0. S&8lh·Cl0 HUDG-i-RFP-AOUER+-l-S-fi.HtN-1------~-------------i
067276 KCHASTER-CARR SUfPLY CO. $1~1.3~ SMALL HARDWARE
~~ ::::
~µ> ,~--·-· ... ----·-·--·-· ----·
::::
(
..... --·--·----------------·----·----.. --·-·-· -··--·-·-·--·--..---------·· -···-·-·-·
(
I,->
\ ~ '. • ' r
(
' ( ( ( ~
~UHi "' JT f;JST IJCRKlNG CAPITAL--·-···--··· ··-P11 OCE SS I NG· OA TE l /06/ 8/t--PAGE----·--3--··-· ·-~----·-·-·----·-. ~UNO l\G
\.N
REPORT NUHB(R AP'i3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY '• ' l
-::a--· --··-·· . --· ·----· -·--------· ------··ClA IMS· PA ID -01/11/84--------· ·······-······ ······ · ·-· ---------·------------· ...... , ....
WARH/INT NO. VE NU OR AMOUNT DrSCRIPTION
~67277 MIOL~ND VALVE & GAUGE $24.00 VALVE SUPPL,ES ~
067278 GEORGE ~lLLER CON!>lRUCTION t.72,'t22.H RETENTION 1-2R-1 11
--U'la 19·--·-------··Ml N£'. ... s AHl·Y-· APPL+ANeE-S--CO.-···· ··--... -. --···-· -----· . .. . $668. 1·2----· SAFETY ·SUPPLIES·------·------··-·-----· _._____ :~
·~ Of.728u HISCO :i'l82.30 PIPE SUPPLIES • u
H
067281 MISCO $38.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ ·
Jf.12&2-.. -··· E.CJ. ·MOHITZ FOUNPRY· ------·-------· ... ·····-···-·--$11526.'iU······ ······-·MANHOt.:E-·RING &··CQHR$-··--.--·---.-----------·--·----~~ II
0&7283 HYCO INDUSTRIES S2Q2.0l SHALL HARDWAR~ u
06 72t'i HYERS TIRE SUPPL y $?08. 71 TRUCK n RE surPt.1 Es· .-•. :' )
Oe-128t>------·--N£L-SON-8R-OS.-GON8TP.-UC-l-J.QN--------$·2't 'l··.-25-PL:AN·-·eHEC K-OVE R-DE PO Si~ . :1
IJ
II
ll
·~
0672f6 CITY OF NEUPORT EfACH s.77 WATER USEAG£ a
067207 HIE CH~ARl CORF '. !H0.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1J'
C672ti8 · -·· ·· OLVMPlC-·CtlEt<lCAL· CO.-------.. ---·····-······· ----------·H5,5Hie87·········----····BULK-C·HLORINE -------.. ----·----~--;:-··-·--·-·------:t
t67289 ORANGE COU~TY DEV. CORP. . $826.88 PLAN CHECK OVER-D~POSfT . ~
067290 ORANGE COLNTY FARM SUPPLY CO~ $137.95 LANDSCAPING SUPr~'~S M
Q"')
"I-,.,, ,. 2 IU··o
J> . ·1:J )
OE.1~~1---· ·-·····--·--011ANGE-YAL-Y.f--&-·F·l Hl-NG--GG-.-----~------···----··-$-38't .55---PI PE-SUPPL I ES··-, ,.
121 --I G67292 OVERHEAD DOOR CO Of ORANGE CTY 1H2.50 DOOR REPAIRS ,,
,. ~ Ob7253 OXYGEN SERVl~E· $727.70 SPECIALTY GASES, WELDING SUPPLIES :;
.. --··· f,f. 12e1t ---·---···· COUNH-· SAfo.-1-l AT l·Of'f·· 0 I S·lR l G-T·--···---··· ·-· ---···----···· ··· ·--~2 t99h 91-·-·----····· -·---·· REP!.:Etf I SH ··WORK~Rp-·eQt1P.-~--f~NP·-······---~---·---·· -··-.. -: n
OE-12% PPG INOUSTRIES1 INC. H91.5Q PAINT SUPPLIES . . n
0£.7296 PACIFIC fE.NCE co. $15.00 PLAN CH~CI< C>HR,..urosn i :
1 --06 n.f;JJ.-----·--·------PAC-IF-1-G--i&l.:E·PHON~ ·---·--H-22·.55 ·f-H·EHE-T-E·R I NG·--· , l•
,. 0672% PALLETS t ACCESSORJfS CO. $2,607.6fi PALLETS 11
" )> G672S9 FARTS Uf\LH'IT[O $112'15.53 TRUCK PARTS >l
,,, r-Ct.1300 .. --... ·--fERMA .. CAL. CCRf1 0RATI ON-----------·· ----···-·--·---· ---.. ·---·$650 .69---------. ELECTR I CAL-··SUPPll ES--·····-------··----·---------II
11 I 067301 PICKWJCI< FAPER PRODUCTS ~hl22.38 JANITORIAL ~UPPLf~S u ~ t::j 06 7302 PITNEY BOHS '8't. 27 POSTAGE MEHR l\~NTM-: ·: .
__..._.--Oo-1 l03---------P.OR-1'.-E;.R-8-0·J.bf;R--SE-RVlC~1-INfr..-1'4-0 4.5 BOH.-ER-·RE PA-I RS----..
-" (.I) ~6730.li POSTMASTER $11000.00 POSTAGE
:: ~ 067305 POWER CREAKING, INC. $9't't.OG CONCRETE
;-t 0 6 7306 hAROLO-f~R I MROSl ... CE···----·---·--·····--·-·-·-····---·--·-----·-·····-· ... ---uo.oo----·-·-·----·I NDUSTRA I L:···WASH
c-> 067307 RAFFERTY lNTERNATIONAL TRUC~S S727.35 TRUC~ PARTS
: ~ 0£73Ui RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $33'i.OO ~TRASH DISPO~Al .u: -~--66 7 309----·---·-----Ttif -RE:-G-18-T £R-·-· ------------------$-31-088.·35--LE·GAL-AND-·C-L·AS·S t rHD-ADVE-R''f-1-S·l·NO ~J'
••
6t7~lu THE REfUBLlC SUPPLY CO. OF $865.6'i PIPE SUPPLIES ~I
Cc7!ll ROBBINS & H£Y£RS $60.29 FREIGHT ~· ..
... Obl!la -· · · -RUSHO COf\ST~UC.TJON,--1-Nt-.---·-··-·--···· -----·· ·-$66,-3§2,81·-------·-·-·(;0NiRAeTOR ··5-H~R·-----··:·--·-·------.-----·-:-:-------::-f~,
067313 S.R,F. MACHINERY ENG., INC, ,,,qq5,oo ENGINE R~PAIRS .
1
:: 0673H SANTA At\A DODGE . Slt61.2'3 TRUCK PARTS . . . .;ci
--·---06 731 b-------·SANTA-ANA---[-LEClR-1 C--HO-lORS ·---5383 .9-3------Uf(;·fR I e-· ·HOfOR I
.. ~i'
~ G67316 SA~TA FE eAG CO. $473.03 BUILDING MATERIALS
u 067317 MARTIN SA~CEDO $46.59 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
la 0(. 131 jj SC OPUS CORP. .. ---·-. ·-·---. --------------· ·-·. -···----···-$952·1!>6. --··-----111N1·-·e·OMPUTER ·-SUPP1--1·~s-·--.. ---~ 067319 SEVE~-UP eOTTLING co. $23~56~,05 us~ CHARGE OVERPAYH~Nt
:'1
'~
C.6732U SHAHPOCK SUPPLY S3t3l'h83 TOOLS . r
·•1-----0E>-1l21 St4AM 1-ARO-Gt-.--KOL L-.-L-tD-f..2-.--03-h-3 f>L-AN·-·C-HfKC-OVE·R-·OfP6S1 ·::
r-.J 1!67322 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. 1162.35 TOOLS
I•~
!t.L
~·1 ... !,~ --~ ..
VJ . ::
~ID
'II
ll . ···---·····-····--·-·-·· ···----·-··----~-----------·····,-··--·-------·------··-··· ·---·-·--·-·--·----·· ···-·· ·-·· -----··-·-----_--"--··-:--:-~~-·--· .~ .. -.--·---~..,--··------·1,J
~'·
...
~C--·· -91-~~ = JT OJST IJCJtlqNG--Cl.f··llAl--·-····-·--· ··---··· ----·---... -..... •·· .... · ···•····· · ...... _...... P fi 0 CE S $-I-NG · 0 Al E.. ·· 1·lu6 / 61t-·'1AG E-·-~--,---·.··-~--··-----·-·~~----~·-...... _ .. -·-··""'.''
~EPORT NUMBER AP"~ · . ' . . .. ..
.. , .. _____ .. _ .. ___ _
1-f]I• ----·--·--
LIARRANT NO.
COUNl~ SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGf COUNTY
---------------·G-U-lMS--PA·l0-9-1-1-H 18-4···-----.. --·· ---------·-
VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
----"o6T323·-·--·--···--SOUTH .. COAS·T-OFFiCEEQ"ul;J.,£-NT---·---·--------···-----·$·;5~8i--·--·---·-·· .. QFmEM-~C·;.-.·"~s--·
~67324 SOUTttiRN ~ALJF. EOJSO~ co, i2~~,953.58 POWE~
' --06.7.3.25------SO .• -.CA-l-I~-LIA-J.U-C-O.. . -··-------------,2-2.6-G-·---°'-·WAJER···USEAGE
w 0£7326 SOUTHER~ COUNTIES Oil CO. t~00.15 DIESEL FUEL
.•
II
ll
II
11 067327 HERHAN ti. STICHT CO., INC. $234.47 HETER
11
•
11
.... __ ---..Uf..7.34tU.--~--·-······-··------HiE--SVP-Jtl l E RS . ···----·--· ----------~-·--··· ·------·· -------·----···42 t 538. 3 l-····-· : .. _____ · ·TOQL S ---··--· · -·-···-· · --·--··-· ·-·····----.,-· · ···-----·----·----·--· --..,.--· ~ 067j29 J, WAYNE SVLVESTER $1,112.~4 PETTY CASH R~IMBURSEH~HT
II 067330 TEL~TVP£ CORP. $107.46 OFFICE SUPP~IE$ . I:
n 06~1 fi-.M--J.HO.M-AS-·-Al·R--CONOl-'J.I-ON-1 NG-----------------!£36Cl .-0-0------·----A IR-CONDI HON I NG-HA I NHNANGE----------11
"G"> Of.7332 lHAfFIC CCf\TROL SERVICE, INC. U26.UO SAFETY SUPPLIES . ''
11 f,, C.67333 TRAJLSIOE HOMES f.331.22 PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT 1;'
11
z._ of>.J.Jlc. --------TRANSA»rn1cA -OELAV-AL------·---·--------------·-·-----·-sa1.92---· -----·--VALV~s---··-·---·-----·-·-------------·---------··-·-: 12 ~ 06733~ TRUCK & AIJTO SUfP'9Yt JN<;, $9'H.'t5 Tf\UCK PARTS
H 067336 TU&EsAL~s $383.1~ r1PE suPP~t~s
" . &-1-3J-l------U"4J.l[0-P.t..RC.f-L·--S£-R·\l-J-C-6--·-··----H6·3-. 't-0-----DEL+VERV--SERV 1·£E-
l --1 Oc733H UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT co., I $112.65 • COMPRESSOR PARTS
11 [!J 067339 vwn sc1E1-n1F1c u,595.78 LAB SUPPLIES . . ,. . . Ju .:=----06 7l'f 0----·---··-·······-··-·VALL·~·Y--C·l T J(S-· &UPP'=-V--f.O,---·---~···"-·-------· -· ···----·-·~33 • 39·-------···P I PE-SUPPL I ~S··--·--:---.--·--· .-;--· ·----·--·-··--··--·--·----1,, '~ ==i:t:: 0673/fl VAREC, lNC, $3l,6't FREIGHT ~ C~ 067?42 JOHN R. MAP~ES • $382.80 ODO~ CONSULTtN~
,, . . . 111.1 ---064.~43 -"1-ARR-f:N-&-iAll-&-Y.--··· -----$429. 04---HECHR-li!·Al-SUPH-1-ES --·-11
II
r.
:1
----------.'* l'J ..
I OE: 7 3Vt UAUKESHA ENc.:I NE Sf RV I CENTfR $1t11 3. H ENG I NE PARTS
( I"' )> 0673't5 1.1£STERfv IJll\E & ALLOYS UtOll.68 WELDING SUPPLIES w
: I-· u t 1J'f6 ·-··-···--------· --R OUR I<[---&·· &JOG OR Uf h--1 NC···-·----·----· ----·--------··· $ H·, 5 0 h 21---·------lE GAL--SER V I t ~ S ; ·-T ft.AH~-E. X P~ ~ ~ ~ S·---···-~·--···-._ .. -·--··-:-···-.. t:~
I O 6 73 't7 x ERO X CO~ P • U 't 3 • 1 p p Ff I CE SUPP~ t ~ $ . .· . · , '' ( 1: l=' 061J't8 £VERETT H. '(ORK co, H't5•7l ENGINE PAt\T$ . ' :~
JI ~-.-···--··-------·-------------·---------·-· • nl
(/) ..
: :-f . T 0 T Al CL A I HS PA ID 0 l / l 1 / B q $ 6 6 6 t 2 5 7 • B 8 ~.
ll -a --·· --· · ·-· ·--· · ·-·--......... _______ ·------·-.. -·-···-----· ·-··-··=;;==:o==-:;=-::=-...... ------------·-···· ------·-----------------··-.. ·-~-------------..,-------··· ··---d
D n : ~
--1 . ~I
·~ .. ,.,
:H
H
n
I~
i~)
::; ... L __ ~ ..
I
-t::' ::: c
.... -----·-·------------------u,
Lii
~I
···-·-··-··· ···-·-·-·-····-.. -·····-··-···---·--·-·-----····-.. -·--· ... ····------· ...... ·-··-·---··--··-· .... ··--·---------·. -----·----.... ·----· -------. ~--·--------·-··:""--·--:-·-··,---·-:-·-: -----~-~~1~:
--------~---~-~--------~
(
I~
~· ...
·---·····--·------------·-------.. -------···--!"
-~
-·~------....;...---"'-----'-·~--..-..---....;...-----"'---------------~-·· '~~
1 •. ,,,
1111 j
·--.-.--·-· ·--. -------------.--..--~~:~
. ~ f·"'· .
~------..;.... ___ ..;... __________ ~...;.;.-_..;·~.v
(
(
~ ·-. f ~ ~ ~·-~ Q .. --~ ! ~ 2 ... ( ' ~ ··-·--...................... _ ....................... --..... --.... PR9~U.§HHLIMU .... -llJl~l.D~-.-~M.~-----·l-... --....... ~-. ., .. ~L~.LH ~QR~HHL ~8U.T~L .....
:I~
f\EPORT NUM~rn AP~3. .. " . . . .· ',. ~
COUNTY SANITATION OtSTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY . ' . ·. ·• ":J;I ~
··-------··. CLAJJ1i.J~AUL __ Jll.LULaL______ . · . . · · · • ··---·-------------------
·11: )1
SUHHARY -----· . ----·--·-------·. ·-------·~--·-----·---...---.. _,.A~tto_u_N._T...,._. __ ------------·--___ .. --·--. ----~~----------·-.---------..
·-·-!IL . .Qf.!!L.f!Hi_O___ -----· ,_j ____ i~J.hJla.S ______ ·-·-· -··---~-··-···--· .. ...:._· __ · -"· _· __
~ #2 ACO FUND 29,700.09
II /J2 F/R FUND Je6,Je30.05
·------·--·-----!:~
11
II-··--·--··--···· H l Q~~ft .fYM~ ... ···-........ -... ---··----... -... -·----·-· -------··"·----·--·---------··· ....... -·-J .79J ... 1-1--·-··-·-···----····-· ·---·--...... _______ --··---····-·---.... -----·--··-·~----·-·-···-·-··---·-----11·
ll I/ l A(: 0 f UN D ' ~ ~ 0 0 0 • 0 0 . . ::
" #3 F/R fUtH> U,300.00 . ;.
I) ~--·NLQU.JLf.YtiJL LJ>5.~.8.t_ ___________ ._ hi rn 05 ACO FUND 66, 352. 8 I '; :z #6 OPER FUND 19. 70 1l
1
•
1 t:::L ..... 67_ QPf;fi H!HD. ----·--·---··---·-·--·----------.-----·-··· ·--·-·-----·· .. -.30, 903 •. 6.~--· -· ----. _ .. _ ........... -.... -·-·--··-·-------·-···---------·---------,,· J:> Hll"OPER. fUNO . . 1,89~).56 ' . . .'1.
......... H 1 t AC O f UN D ..._ i. , 2 5 0 • O o ;;1 ;
zi --+-··· __ iS~fLOf EIL.fUND._________________ . ·-·-----'--··----8.16 ... 7.l-------·--.. -·---.. ------· ---------·· -·---.. ·-·----...;.;....:.. :•·
II rr1 H6&7 OPER FUND 2,981.21 N IH:::::: JT OP.f·R FUND lllt,830.09 :
....... CORf ___ ... ---·-..... ·----·---·--·---·-----------.. -------·------80, .. 10.L.U ·--~-··--.. -.... --·--···---.. ----·-. _---. --·--·-··---.~-......... --....... -... 11
sELf FUNDED LIAQILITY c~AIM~ 'N$URA. "c~ FUNb ~~2.50 · . ·· · · I~
SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURA"C~ fO"P ~,99~.97 . ~ •
II • ____ JL WORKltHLtAf.l..IALEUtiQ ------·--·----·---6l •. 67.9 •. 28 ____ · -------________ .· _____ · ----"_· ____ .. _. ____ -------· --1" ,,
~,
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/11/84 $666,257.88 . ~ ................... -.... --.. --.. -·----·--------·-------·---·---·--·------······----··---·-·--··· -···-·"--·· ···--··-------·-··----··--·-···--.--.. ~---··--·:-·-:·-··"'.'.'-··-. -~-~-------·--·-··---·-.. -· --·-:·---·!::
;•·:
u . --··-------------------··-·~ j1~:1
--I 4• : ·~ -.. .. ...... . ·--... --------·-----·-·---------·-· ·-·-------... --__ .... _._ ---·-______ .. ___ ........ _, __________ .:. _______________ --·---. ·-·--:: un ,-~ .--I ~
(/') ~I
.tJ
40
41
I~,
IU .. ,,
,,
~I
>I
::::
'''LL .. -..
U1 :::
~' ~ll
!.:
-~
~· ·•-_., ••• _ ..... , __ ,. ... _. ______ ........... -.. --•·-·-----·• "'---·-·------··.---••·-·~•··--· .. ·•---:•---. .... u .. • •),
I~'
·-----------------·-----· ·--·-·· ·-· ---·--···---------·-·----·-----------.. ------
.. --------· -~ --· ·--·--------·-·-------·--·-·~·
·-------------· .. ·-·---·------· ---·----
.. ---------···~---------------·
lit!
"
it~
I~
II
11
. ·---···-·-·--~---,-~--·----. -··----·-----·---···-~ ~
I
:::
l:.d
I
I-' :::
FUND NO <;··:.'3199 :-~·'.::'lrirBr.lltlfRTNG C~PllAl-~ -
. . ., .· .. '-.. ·1·:: ·-.· . ' '. .
~""':
-~----~PlH>tt SSTNG 0ATr-T7t 9Ilrltc -NGE
RtPORT NUHBER-AP~3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ,
~-f-jls
----·-crniis .. t>Hoofi2sia~·-·-··-----------·----------···---------·----------------------
WARRANT NO.
"'
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
•ti-I ---0-6--7-. 3_7_0_: ---_...,...; ..,.._ -AD_V....,.A_N_C_O_C_C N-'S_T_R_U_C_T_OP-s-.-.-N-c-• ..,...,..--------· $2 5: 5 7 5. 7 0 c ONT RAC TOR p 2-2 7 • 1:~
: ---_gt~~-~; ! -~E r~gt~~~p;~~-f~~~;. 1-~if ;----------~--------si 'Hl;~~-----·----~~n-~~H-~i:A:f-:P--·--------·------------· ·-...... ---·-:~
11 067373 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. S.666.81 AIR CONDITION-I-NG CONTROLS
, 06737'1 taMERICtaN ~IR FllTERt INC. -· ---·-$70.21 AIR CONDITIOfflNG MAINTENANCE
~-~E7375 JHERICIN toNCRETE ~TTINGt INC $11;100.00 J~~~~~~-~---~----~-~~~~u
067376 . A~ERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS i23q.30 LAB SUPPLIES
06737l AMERICAN SIGMA , t468.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLiES
u
11
---··-o67'3'7lJ ______ nlrAfJCH01nruxING co. ---------------·f9g·~·99----·-·····-PiH.fP .. PA.Rfs ... -....... ··--.. --·---------··-·---·----····-···· ····-··. II
C~7379 ANGELICA RENTAL S£RVICES s100.oo TOWEL RENTAL II
ll
C6 7~80 AQUA BEN CORP• S17, 968, 10 CHEH I CAL COAGULENTS --In
--"06731!1 ARROill•Rlsco, INC. U39.55 EHc'flITCAISUJ>i>CTU
067382 ASSOCiATION OF H[TROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES 141781.00 HEHBERSHIP DUES
06 7383 . BANK OF At'ER lCA NT & SA. S6 O .18 TRAVEL EXPENSES "
-·-£i6no4 PECK HAN 'It.SfiHJMCNTS------·--------s-:r~us-:26--· --EUC'fiU CA[-SiJPPl I ES--···--------·--··---· ... ·····-..... "'
I!
067385 eELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO. $576.85 PIPE SUPPLIES
067306 BELMONT Ef\GJNEERING S28 1 9~0.40 CONTRACTOR PW-107
II
-·o6r387 ' e IE R Ly &ASSOC I A TE s. IN e. $55 0. 0 0 -WORJ{Elfs1 cORr.-i\iHffffTITRAfiJRS ----
067388 '. eoe•s AIR CONDITIONING ' $520.66 TRUCK REPAIRS .
HI
14
067389 BOMAR MAGNETO SERVICEt INC• S298e02 ENGINE PARTS ·~
"' -----06 7 390 DOYLE° E t\G J NEEiffNGCOR·P-----------·--·--·-i"r~·9,.3·;·73 ·--HAS TER "P1ArruroA'iT"l1o-·nw£ir-11AlHfENANU. l) I STA I CT" Ill
u67~91 flCHAEL BRA~O,.AN & ASSOC.,JNC ss,512.01 CSDOC #2,3,11 MASTER PLAN EIR
06 7392 THE C!URKE COMPANY $232. 02 PI PE SUPPLIES i"' 1 f:r--1;-~. BUTJER_ EN0NEERINGt (NC. S39tl91.50 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEHENT P2-23/P2-Zlt, P2-23-6 curnr ;;
Ju-d 06739't C & R Rf.CONOtTIONING CO• S310e00 PUHP REPAIRS
067395 CPT CALIFCRNIAt INC. $816.90 WORD. PROCESSOR MAINTENANCE ·"'-·06 73% cs ciHi'f"A'N-v--------. -·---------------··------$~ 1Y3:26--------·-·vA[vE5· .... -·-·--···-··-.. ·-·---·-· ··---··-··-··--·· .... ___ ····--· "
067397 c.w.F.C.A. $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
06739~ CAL-GLASS FOR RES[ARCH, INC. S56.53 LAB SUPPLIES
II
"-·-~7399 CAL-FAC'""'"Ci1£Hmlco •• INC. "i39e16 . DESCALE°R
067400 .. CALr~. ASSOCi OF SAN. AGENCIES . $11650.ob ' MEMBERSHIP DUES 4
:---·---··gH:_:;-----·------. ~. ~fuJf~~~-l~ir:.~~~Nf~is-·-----·--·--· -----------·-nr ;-~~;;~-~--------~~-~~ ~.-,~~~~ ~:.::. 2tr;-·P2: 2 F2',"'" E'NE'iHPf"TASiC'FOiH:r -~ .... <:1
11 067403 JOHN OROLLO ENGINEERS $61274.18 ENGR. P2-26, ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPSOAL ::
u C67404 HONTIE CARTER CONSTRUCTION S7,183.~9 MIXING TANK REPAIRS ~
4~ ------·-n-ntf5 ., ~ARlf£1r=lffrtCfNclf£T"E·;--mc. s242. 0·3 euITiITNG HATEiffAT.s · . ~,
067406 , CHEV~ON·u~s.A •• INC. U3t212.96 GASOLINE, ENGINE Oil . . :~
067407 CONROCK COHPANY S652.67 BUILDING MATERIALS
,. ----061'io·a------c01isoniu1rn--tLcctR 1citr-ors1 ~·---------··---------·--··s2·.s1i ~ 33--·-·----E:itc.fi\ i tAI: surPi rg------·-·······--· ---·---J ~67409 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS S2t499.50 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
067410 CONTJNEf\UL CtlEMl.CAL C(l S2t187.8lf CHLORINE
.,·----067411 cooPfif-£Nri6vsERVicrs -· u.o~-7.o6 ENGINE-PART-s ------------
~· 06Hl? COUNTY "ICE AMC $424.31 TRUCK PARTS
1
:: ·-:;---·---~~-H-l~-~~~Gli; :-"~~=-g~A~~~ !c·sr.·Rv 1«:-rs---·--···-----------~----·~~H: ~~-·-··-------··~!~Yh«·!it ··~u~:n~~ -~~-~~ -~-· R --· -·-··· ··
_.,. 06H15 CAL CONSOL JD,, HD WATER $6,.. 70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
~----~-~--~----
" ul
" ns
-:.-1 .....
10,
I
11
II
•·r:1 (
------·-~-· ·~·· .. --·-· .
• U4
----·. -·--··-· ....... ., _... --···· -... "'' "." __ ,, -· .( ( ..
11•.
I~
.. ( ( (
::: ...... . ·--··· ·-....... --· ···--.. -.. ... . ····-· •· -··-·· ···--····-····-... •··· ..... -. -.. ··-·---. . ... . .. .......•. -· -. -................ ·-----... -··-····-· -·--·-····---·-··~··-·--. --·-··------··---·-·· '!"~~ FUNO-tfO 9199 -J.T OlST ~ORl<JNG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE i_ll9(~1t PAGE ~ · ..
, I REPORT NUMBER AP~~
> "2 ·-·-________ f_Q_UNTJ_g_f'J.!_l AT !Q!'LQllil!.I~.!L9f_..Q.fllN~LJQYNU ________ _
-CLAIMS PAID 01/25/8~
··1!) . :.·.
, . . I ~-· -· _____ _.i__ :
, ..
{_··-----~~~~ANT_!~~· ~-----------_ _y_f ND~.-··--····--·--------·-·· . ____ ~'10U~!. _________ ·--·-------·---·---Q~f.fHPT I ON
...
' la Of»lHfii P'1~, INC. U68.03 TRU(:K PART$ II ' 06H17 DANA Hf §.i_1_j.N£.t__ -·-·-----·-·-·---··-.1..22.2.t.1.1 ___________ .JUtlf ... REf.A.lRL _______ .:.:.... : __ ,. :~·
( ,.. 067'tl9 DELPHI SYSTE~s. INC. u,100.00 PENSION PLAN PROGRAHHING . ·~
IUI 0 f. 7't 18 0 E c 0 f. 9 2 • 2 2 EL E c TR I c AL supp L 1 E s Ill
:: ·· · ····~HHr----·------~~~!-~ '-~~~sY~5~H~~t~fi1·5·-··------~--· ··-·-···------· · -· ----,~~~:·~~ ---------·· f ~~-l~f__"~~~~~: nti"G-,-.-.-.. -; :~ ---·--··---····--·~:_:· ;::!
( I" 067't22 (l~RA09 LNTERPRt~ES, INC. $~q,f>77eU CQtHRACTOR' pw .. 11~,. ~H.GfN.~ :~~,"~"~ .. i··~
I~ :l> 061't23 DUMAS UY.EL INJECJJON U11U.a.U~---EHGJHLfAIU.S.. ;·, ·: .· ' -. .. --------··------t~:
•• G"> C67't2't DUNN EC~ARDS CORF. $22't.97 PAINT SUPPLIES j~l~
:: ~ . ;~.~~~~-.. ----·-----·--~l~~;!~ .. ~I~~~--~~~~~-~~--~-·--~-----·--·--·-····-·-· .. ·····--·--·-·--H.:~~~;.~_L ___ ~--·--· ~~.~.~ C~.~~.~~~~-~U~-------.--,---~---.,..,-·--. -·---·_,_·-··--·--···· _i;: •~ .: .. . .. . o ~ H a7 ENG 1 N f ER 1 NG .. $ C ~ E NC E . $ 'f 5 t O O O , 0 O · . co -c o ,.Ul Us T I o N HAS I P. I L IT Y $TU py . · · · · 1;.
lo-;;:::. Ot>7~28 £NYIR9NHE~TAL PRODUCTS. JNflL, $31373,1? · HECTRICAL ~~Pnlt:~-·.-;,,·· : ·.:_.. · . !"~
11 i-t 06H2'3 ENVIROM~Ehl_!L R(SOURCE ASSOC, S.2ll~50 LAILANAU.SIS , .. ·-· . :~· 1~'~j
I• [!:! 06 7't 31 f ABCO S2't 0 .10 DRAPES II
,, =-r 06 H 30 Et\ v IROSFHER E co. $92. 00 c SDOC 15& 6 HA STER PLAN EI R :I
11 --:-=-_ --~~ ?H.~----------L~~!.hl A~ ._P.!f~ --~-~YEf.ll.. -·--··---··-·---·· -----···---·-----··-H~!91L _____ e 1 P.E_ suP.etHS-----·---·---------------~-··---·(
!'> =t:t:: 067't33 fEOf:RAL ElCPRESS CORJ>, S2't,OO PELIVE:RY SEf\YICE .. : ,:~,
"GO 067't3ff nsHJ:R SCIENTIFIC co. $78~59 LAB SUPPL I~~ . ·., . . . . . ....
Cl6H35 FLAT & VERT I.ill CONCRETE _ Ua!t..1..Q~ __ _tj}JlLD.R.l.LU..tUL.. ' ' . --~---·---]· I'>•'
067436 CLIFFORO ~. f0PK£RT $720.00 SURVEY P2-26 :
n 'J> 067437 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAH£RA $9.5~ FILH PROCESSING ji
RI f-. ~~ ?'!.~~---· -·-···--.f..!!LJHlli.L!N.QUt!HI.L£.Q.1Sl!f!f.J_!. ____ ----··--.,..--· ·-·-·--· ___ ..!~..11~~ :ft.L ____ -:-·-·· ~URETY' PW-09Q-··-·---···-······--:·
II r-06"l't39 fRUJT qRO"ER~ ~APOR"TORY, l~~. $26,00 LAB ANALY$f~ :1.~
P6H~Q fUl..CO SAi-ES '1t279.,95 $HALL HA~DWAI\~
0 7't'1 cny. Of fULLERJON u.~21t WA.T.EILU5..EAG --
.. r.n 06 74'12 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S7, 758 .18 TELEPHONE 1:: ii.___. ---· ·---·----····-··---··-····· ---· --
J• :":'j
"·r; 06H~~ f:,G, HnLER!S ~ON, lNC, S2't6t't6 TOOL~ . " .. _.,,:·:·' .. " ' •. _,. . .
• ---t Qfl7H~ :" HOLCttEM, INC, ·... U2t210,31t CAU$TIC SODA ·.-:.•, .,-,... ··:·:<: .'. ·.
l• U) 067'697· ·R,S. HUGHES CO,.t.-1..t!f, · U9!.J8 SA£E..I..LS.UUUEF • · · ·.· ·'.:.-.:·. · '·. ;: · ·"
4U 0671f118 CITY Of HLNTJNGTON eEACH sa.a2 WATER USEAGE
" 067~'t9 ICC INSTRUH£NT $2't.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
-9~? ~~!!. _______ ... , .. -.Jill ... ~Q~f ~~H---··----····--·-·----~-~····-·-··-·-. -. ..!! I !!2.2.:§ft. ______ f.l.QW .KOtU-lOR~NG~:!l~V-t.~f-:..U4~-t!-~ ""T, ,...,,_-,..-.-...,._.__,..,... __
Ool'i?l · IHPEftlAL Wf~l Cfff:MJCA~ CQ, -· · ~3,722.20 FERRIC CHLOJ\IPf; .: . : ..... :: ..
u D 6 H ~ 2 IN 0 ~ S TfH AL ASP HAL T $ 2 8 4! 61 Q U I L D I NG f1A Tf. IH A~$ ; r. '. . . ... ; · ,. :. i: -· , ~~ ___ !iH53 JNOUSTR J Al __ !HREAQED ffi..QDUCJS _ _ll_~i.tJ!~ SMAL.Lll.ARAWAJif · ' ... : ·" .,. «:: ·: -. -·
1.~ G67't54 JNTEROX Al'ERJCA $31031.99 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE TANK RENTAL
067455 IRVINE SIJEEPING SE"VJCE S't98.GO PLANT MAINTENANCE
--~~?~~~--___ --··-..... -~QL.~~~~f ~£HH! !.~§ .. f.2.! ···--------,-----·--·--------~.H~2.~L·--·--.ElEC.I.llJCAl-.SUP.l?t.-trs.__ . , . .. _,.,.... ....... _____ ___,
06 H57 . K AS ~Aff:TV P~QDUf:T~ · U 51 t !t3 $AF fTY· SHO~S . ·.: .. ·,.: ... ·.: ,., i:.<,.~ :~' . .) . "~~:: ~:::·_;·.
0~7't58 K,lNG PEAtHNGt JN~. $31959,ij6 PEAi\ i NG SUPPLH~ · .... :,,·::'.:: :-:.;~:'.'<{·'.. ·<·;/··:!<'_,-;,~~:· .. :-. .-·: .. '. 1 r
067'159 L & N UNJfORtt SUPPLY co $4t3H.Ol llNl.EQ.RtLJlE.H.IA• I•.·'··(";,"·· ... ,• .. ·:·:-.· .... ,_,, ..
067't60 L.e.1.1.s., INC. $11103.26 WELDING SUPPLIES
bi 061't61 LA HOTH CHHICAL PRODUCTS $H.lf4 LAO SUPPLIES
r-:,•
~:Lti3 . -..... ---------------. -~--~~~--~~::·--.. -. ., -------·----0 ~~ -------~--~~ ·:· -:.~~.":Ef'.·:·:F·~;\_· · .. :; -· -,
+ (-......)
:::
,. !~~···FuN6 ·No·.····· ·9·is9~·-·Jr·-a1sr·-ucRK·1-NG··cAn~11c·~0 :~~~·-·5:·~~~~{~~--~~~~~-;;·~5 ~;~~:~:-mI~~~!~=~~=T~~:~m~nm-·-~---:----... -. ~·~c . ··. _:
I-{'-.,,,
WAR~ANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
06Hfi2 LAURSEN. CCLOR LAB S25.t3 FILM PROC~SSING. .. . . .. ·,. ~.,
.. .. ... -·-·-·~· ---.. ·---·-------·-·------.. --·· ... -··-···-··---.. -·-----.. .-.. _ .. _ ...... -.. -·---···-··-··--··-·-.. -·---'"'"-····-··-·-----····----·4 ---·-·-----.·-~---·-·-~-------.. ----:-, -. -·--. ---. ·~~
( II
067'ff,~ u:wco ELHTfUC co, $~85.59 ~LECTRICJ\L $1JPPLl-~S · '·· ~ ·----
1u1 --o 6.., '16 4 l I GH T fNG"OTs"T Rieu T 0 Rs' I NC. i 263;·70-···-----E [E c·T-ifrt ALS1fP"i>TIB
067'165 LOCAL AG£~CY FORMATION COMMISSION 1350.00 ANNEXATION #112 PROCESSING FEE ~ ( Ill
II 06H66 THE CHARLES LOWf CO. $82.25 PU_HP __ PA!_\IS ____ ----·---___ _ -~--·----~--·~.
IJ ····061,61-··---------,,.-,fNtfOtCiii:JijSTlNG ___________________ .. _______ ---···--·-----.iy;"S·so·~_c;u-...-·--. -. -c·s.·poc--12.rtt.ANtt9H.RrP. ~·". $ .. '~·: ..... · .. J •• :· :~1
( 114 067't~8 .MARDEN SUSCO $1'tt598.32 PW ... 102A Pf~l~f. . .,·, ..... .,, ... _ ... · · .. ::-· 1.,
::hGlj,,._.---~g.g~NTI~~~tP~-~~t co~P !-~:~-:~~--------~-~~~Ks·~-~tHES "; . .-... :· .> · ·--~--~·-----:'.i
11 r11 Ci6H71 HCHASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $3q.;sq PAINT SUPPLIES ,;
11 :-~ 067'i72 MITCHELL f'ANUALSt INC. $82.20 PUBLICATIONS ,, "s--.. --·ob71f73---------·Ko·~n·o-MtRv-·t~Eylf(i"fl-~Of1PANY~.-------···-----··-·1·29·9;49----------·--rTA.NT-·l'2°···nn~tQtf.HATn~~AtfCf"-. -.-. --. --·-~-. -.----,.,
'"):::::. fi6Hl~ HOTORQLAt INC, : $8,035.29 BASE STATIQff COfifiU~IC/HIQti$ ~CU}tPt1~ffT :~j
:" ·~--D~?.!.!5 N~ TI ()~A~ LUM~~_ft SUPPLY ----------~!J!.!.~.~----·---1~~.!:...l:__t!~~P..WAI\~ __ ·· ". 'i . .. .. i'
11 ---, H 7't 16 NA Tl ONAL SON IC S $553. 86 LAB SUPPLIES : .. ,
1/J [!J 06H11 c IT y Of NEl.IF on BEACH • S33. c3 WATER USEAGE ~
I~ -=-i) 6 H 7 8 0 c [ AN s H 1 c 0. • I N c • s. 6 1 6 • 7 5 s ALT •.
/; ~---·-06·74n··-----. -oi:-vlfP-lc-(:~fiilcACto,. _ ----~-. --·ra9'i66,~'f-----. -uut"K ctfL_o-:.nN·~. ·· · :: ,~_ ...... ~~-:7"--·--_-.~---. -.·-·':I
'~ oo· O 6 H 8 0, OR ANG~ VA I-V ~ g f p TIN fi C 0 , $ 3 , 3 2 9 • 8 2 P I P ~ $UPP L I E ~ .. · .· ;· , . : · · . ' . . . . · . ~
11 OU't8l OR HEX CORP . Ut720,67 SttALL HARPWARE · ·.·"' · . · ,., "·· ,_In
1• ·I----·-{f61 lf82 OXY Gl:N SERVI C S89. 5/t SPECTIT'iYGASE-~... DEHURRAGE 111
n:J> CJ6H83 COUNTY Cf ORANGE ·-·· S2 1 332.55 TESTING P2-26....t, _qUARTERLY PAGER MAINTENANCE :
•111 1 067't61f COUr.JTY SHllATJON OISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY S.2 1 794.ll REPLENISH WORKlKS 1 COHP. FUND 11: :: ... ~:~:·~:··---------~~~~r;c~~:·1[;"~;}~~~~StRlc)---·-------------:--···--·-· :1g·~-:!r-·------~~!-~~-~·ro·~~-~n~:-R-~-N-TA-~---~~~ , ___ ::
,,.......,. 067't87 PACIFIC BEl-L $3~3.88 • TEl.EHETERltfG •.
H (/) -ci6'rlf 8 8 p A AT s u ~LI HITE D $l ' 9 2 0 • 'I If fiW c K-P ART s
n -I 06 7't 89 PERttA-C AL CORf'OR A Tl ON $975. 39 El ECTR I CAL SUPPLIES .
.111;."0 06H90 P£f<HA PURE PRODUCTS, INC. U 1 761.22 ELECT.RICAL SUPPLIES "
JI 'r; ·-P6 H 9f"--~-··:·---PHNt-y" B~l"~E·s·--·--------~·--. --, --·--.. ----------,75·;·00~------.-i>ostAqE·-HETER-ttA' ~n"Ni\tl1~--~~~~-:--,~~ .,
1a -I 06H92 QUALITY BlJJl-PJNG SUPPLY U3.H BUtlDtNG MHRl(\t..~. · " .
nU> 06H9~ TtlE Rl:PUflllC SUPPLY co. Of CALIFOfUjlA, INC. $'12.06 PIPE SUPPLl_~E~S-----------------------t ~ --ll"ni.-~ RTf"NMliALU"P.lNUH SUPPLY co. sf,649.6(J STEEL STOCK
u Ob7't95 RICHARD'S ti'tORAULJCS $2'15.67 TRUCK REPAIR~. --,~:
" 067't96 ROB~INS & MEYERS ·· ··-·-· S't,791.lfl PUMP PARTS --~•
I:: ~ g ! ; ~ . ·-........... -· --· ~ ~ ~~~~If~~~~ ff I NS -f'"O·~·o·-~-~ ·-·--·· ' . --·---. ····----·--·-·;-~ ~ !~ ~ :·l :----. ---I:~~ ~~r ~:I~ IN~--;-~~ D.~ f .. TRA~· ~ ~ J\. . . . ': ~~:~~------r~~!
1• 061't99 SAND OCLlftR BUSINESS fQ~'1S $l'tD.9& OFFICE SUPPl.IU · _1u..
•• --G615·oo SEARS, R(ft'eUiK & co. $2,323:-52 TOOLS-t'
u u67501 SHALLER & LOhRt INC. $2115.lf.OO ENGR. 5-18R ·,
11
-g~~~~~----·--. ----···--$~:-~]-~ifi···~*~~f~E"RY-C"<>~----.-------~-------~-----H-~~H;l~----. · :~~fM~~:~~-1~~!ie~A~e .. ,· :_.,~ ~.·-:~.-~----,-~--~--:-·::1 06 750't S •MS I NPUSTR I AL SUPPLY . $593 .60 WHD I NG SUPPi. In· . ·· · . ' ·. : ...
l.4
•\
1~~1 ' :;
"'LO
0~750~ CHARLES Sl'Hti co., INC, SS'l,72 TRUCK PARTS . ·· ,_, '..-.
OE.7506 SO. CO~ST AIR QUALITY H·ANAGEHENT DISTRICT Sl99.28 PUBLICATfONS ti
067507 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. S89,306.57 POWER t
_,._. --· .. ··-·-·-· -··-·--·· ·-· ---.. ··--·----· .. ----... ----·----~--·-___________ .. ·---.. ~-.. -··----.--·----··-------4••·-·-~ ---.. -·-: .. ·-~-'··.-·-. --,_~---i?-: : ~:~ . ';' 14
;: .,,to.
-1-------·· ·1··..:·· .. 1y
\>.I :::
( ( (
r. ( (
il-c:aflJNP ~o
( '" ...
~ }..... . .....,.
>_~ ~~~-~~
9fss ·;.;·-~:n-tflst ~-CRKJNG. CAPJT~C-..... · ···-·· p1f<fftssHitr··oiYf .... lh 1iia'i-·PAG·f~ · .,.--.. ·····-··
~EPORT NUHBER:Ap'~ .
coutny SA_ll!!.!.~JJ.q~_,.Q!~J.!!!CTL.Q.f_J!~!.~.L.f.9UNT_l .
CLAIMS PAID 01/25/84
-~· ·-·,.-·":·I: i·
~ l
.c_.:.:.I~
--····· -~~~!!t.~~-__________________ !!!~Q.Q~---------·---------· ----·-----~!'-~'l~! ---------·-0£ S.£fi!f.1!.QN ____________ _
oi75(JO so. CA.L· C?AS ~o. Ult2l2"66 NATUf\AL GAS.· . 'II•
(167509 SOVTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO, ___ H_b351.!.1L_. __ Jll~.HLfUH._ · ~·:
111 G67510 SOUTHWEST FLEXIBLE SElilER £QUIP $708.81 VALVES , •· ,,
:'. ---··· mm-----·--· -{{~~i~ci.ii~~::~~£-~-----·----··------····---····11 iiii !ii--------im~,m~~----------~
11 06 75 l't THE SUf PLIERS S32ih 5~ TOOLS -• -· . ·1 1~
•·• G67515 J. WAYNE SYlYESHR _.. _____ · S793,69 . fU.1.'LGM.lLU .. Ui!ll.ftUHENI ·· . . ... 1'~
•• ~ 067516 f.M. THOMAS AJR CONDITIONING s1.100.oo AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE ~~
II rn 06nl7 TONY•S LCCI< & SAFE SERVICE i53.0~ LOCKS :.1
ic Z uf-7518 TRANS-Al'ErHCA DELAVAL, INC. $94.65 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 11 ., --~ · ··06·1519··~~ ·-------t"i~1-vtr-ErnFH-··-~·--·--·--~·-----~------------,..--~~-. -» .-j-ai :oo·-··-··-----~ AiR-i A·~r:-vAiflcrnr·•rHrn~·~-,-.-.. --~.---·---~---•. -~"'."-........ ·--··-··· ':
1a Ofi752Q TRUCK ~ AUTO ~UPFLYt JNf;, . . . ,g,875,27 TRUCI< PARTS . ·, .· ,_ . , ' · ·~;;
u .....,_ 06752\ J,G, JUCHft f SONt INC, i6'l,1) ELlliJHCAL SUPPLIES · ·, ·. • _ .. ,_
11 =106'r522 CITY OF TUSTIN S76.lf6 WATER USEAGE tJ
u [!:! Of7523 UNION OIL CO. Of CALIF. $16.61 GASOLINE :
:~ ---i---.. ~~~~~~-----------T~P-~~&~HH~ SEI<!!_~-----------------$~~~=]~ .. ---tu ~~~~L ~~P_!CE .. .. -------------. ~~
'~ CO Of> 7526 YAl-l-EY C l1 l ES SUP{'ll Y ~(), . $951, fl Pf PE $UPPl:-I ~S(i\4ATEf\ 'tit;AHR . . · ... . 1:
" t 067527 CARL WARREN & CO,. · ___ --·-$300.0p LIA~il.~LH.~.1-M.~·AOMINISIRATOR · 1 "'-·--~-· .• _· _· __ ...;.~._ __ J1 ..
111 ---~7528 IJAUl<ESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER ·-. $28"·75 ENGINE PARTS 111
"N •1-:::. {167529 lJE'STERN lilliU: & ALLOYS U77.{J2 WELDING SUPPLIES , ..
M r 067530 IJESTJNGtiOlSE ELECTRIC CORP $1,703.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~ : : ~! ~;~~ -~--~-···--·· ~O~R~~·I :G~~!~~~·;;~--.N~-, ------------·-u 5·:~~~ :·;r--··--·n~HR ~~~f;~~~~-~n·~ . . ----.. -.-.. --~-.-~---~·.·-··1::
Jl .,.__. 06 753:, XEROX CO~P t · $31377 r U XE ROX U.e.filli>UCJ I ON-.. ·· .··. . · · · . · 111
Jt f./) OE. 753lf Y -Tl RE $792 • 82 TRUCK TI RES 1·~1
·-I 067535 GEORGE Y~ROLCY ASSOCIATES t276.lfl VALVE SUPPLIES~;,
J.•1. ~ -----------------......... "j.n • --1
l> rn
•u
u .,
n
u
"··
1U
'O
l~I
r..:t
•l
1~4
~~
::::
ld
..s:::-::
-.. _ ... __ .,. -.. -···-·-:··-.. -........ ---~-----·--··· ·····--·~ ....... --·--:-~~----· .. :·---.···--. --. ---:-----·····-·----------..--. -~·-····--·--····-----·...---:--~7~·~.-·
TOTAL CL~fHS ~AlP OJ(~~/P~ .. H19:$t332,l5
=~===~~¥~~~==~=~=
··-··-· ---;--··-·-·-------;-·-··--------~-----\ -.....
·----·---
~ • j
..
: .. f:
'· ;.;:-;x( ;~f ih. c~ ';
:',;!.'._:··.·:\,~f.''. :·.'·
·.', ...
··--;-;~ .. 1::
w
~I
~.
u
•I
~
I
i\91 ,,
···-~_J 1, '. • ~I -,. "" ••
'•I
It,\
1"'1
. ·~I ....
1u
1
II ,, . ____ ,.,,, ____ ... _.,. _____ , ...... __ ·--------~-·----··-·· ···--·~-------·--r----;--~ .. -~~--~-
1.: .. •.. .. --; . _ · ·, ~r :':;;:::.~::;ii'!'::·: · J: :>:'. :. ; : : · ; ·. ::~· l '· .: ·,.
t
:::: ta· ... fUHD .NO ..... --SI-~~ .. ~ ......... JT p.J ST. .. WORKING--~A~-ITAL ...... .
I
Ul
---:::: __
,,
. .. .... -.. . --·· ........ _ ......................... -·--··-·-·----··-~-ROC.f.S.$.ltf.A-Oi\J.t-.-.. J.tJ.~/,.8~-:--et)GE~_--.·.· .-. ~.~ . ., _____ .--~·~-~l-
RHORT "~MP~~· f\P~l:. ·:.:\. "-., ."::.-'.f'··~:;:.:<"" . . . : :
COUNTY SANITATfON DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUtHY . :-: .;-· ... ·. ''. ', · .'. ,... : 1
---------' ----· --CLAUSS-eAJO .• --OJ./25taL-... ·. .. .. · . . .. ".
~ .. --:-•
• JI~ )1
••-·------SUMMAR~
-·-......... -.~··--·--___________ .,. _________________ --··----·-·~--------~-----..-.... -----·--·--.. ---· ·----------.. ---~-------~·-.-.. -. ~--.-~-. -. -. .
• 1 -~. : ' • : ' '~ .. ' f·' • '
··.; ·:·· ·"
' : . 1 o ·~ ' I ' o ' ' ' '
-r. ' . ~ :• • . )I)
. IJI AMOUNT------------·--····--·---.. ---·
IU
II ::1 '
-·-/11. -Ol!~R-· ~UNO·-------.. --------···-·----·----------·----·---------------$---1·85-~·fiO----·---·-·-··-·--:·----------·-· ~'·-:--:-· ~-~-.--···.'"--:-.-"7"'.:.--:--:-.:-·· .. ·.--· ·----
11 ACO fUfiD -----582.00 . . -... : .. , -.-.· .· > , .'..·! ·.·
1J2 oPrn fUttD 6,875~23 . . :>!.'. :<:;<:· .".,;
·~ -12.-ACO-FUND 2.,.480-.-4 l . : . •. I . : ,'• •:.•:.,, • . • •• f:l // 3 0 PER FUND I 0 , 3 9 9 • 5,.
11 :2! /13 ACO FUND },691.82
II ..... t:::;;J ....... 6§ O~ER-~UNO--------------·--.. ·---·--·--'J.., .. 711 .... 99
" ::&::> 15 A.;:9 fUNo· . ~.1sli.oo
'" II
!I
·~
111
;:,
ltl
It
IJ
H
; t -·.-
•• .1 .. 111 16 ACO FUND . . 1aa.10
II ~--#-7-0l!ER--F-UN .,.)'60-. . .r.. . : ;-____..__: ___ . --· -· -·
rn #7 ACO FUND 1,151.9,.
::3: /111 OPER FUND • 6,165.07
"1·-~ · ·-#11·--MQ-~UNP·-----.-. ----~__.,..--·----:--...,.....---. -----,.---·--·----. --~§.1.-~21-....,..~------------. -.-··---.. ,·-·· ..... , .. ~-"""'7"----··---·""':-··--.,.-~~
fi co N 13 A~O FUND . . h 1. 68 . . . . ·: .-:: />,, -. "' .. "'.:. t' ... "" : • . ' . SI
'" 15 & 6 o P ~ R FUN Q · · · . . ~ , 6.Q 1 • 5 5 · · . . · . : ' '..'. . . ~. . . · . : -. · '. . ~
II #-U'-A~UN . . . ·-9.2-.-00 . ' . . . . ! . . . . . :·
~ -#6&7 OPER FUND 17.02 "' rE:: JT OPER FUND 219, 204. 20 n
1 r"=---COl\f-----·-···-----·-. --------------·----2~J.-r(> l~..-48-----· ·H ~f~f f~"DfD ~IA~t~tTY c~~fHS INSURANC~ F~NP 1,~11.so :: !=! $E;LF fU"D~D WOl\l<fR~' C.OHP,. IHS~RANC~ fl)HD 3 '344. 11 ·.-.;::.: '.'.-.. i-.'-'/. ' .:-.. "' u
'" .• n----J-l-WORK-1-NG-CA~t-T-Al-li'-UN -J..,-lJ.8 . ..-.j . ,,
. -·.~--:--~·-.·:~-·1:;
10
-I
.., ~ TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/25/84 $603,332.15 :1 @ ... -------·-· --·-·-,-·---------------·
'u
0
II
n ·-... --------·-·---·-----···------·--------.. ---~~---..... ._ ____ --------···------~----. -----;---97 ':•' .·,
II • . !} ;.,-:
·~
l~
···----··---·-·· ------·-----·-----·-------····--·· --·-·---·~-·-.-.-----·-----------·------··--·_..,.----·-----....-----.-. ---;~ 't
·. ,,·
1~•
I
]
i..I
_-·a·-.--·--.· . .
' ' ,· . . . ·.-.....
. . · ' ... · .. :>· .. '' ~·
: . ~'
~1:
.;i
I~
---:--·--"',:
". \II .. ~
{ J
'
' " • ~I
llD
II
. . ": F.1·· " -i .... ---· ---. ~ ---.. ----·-... -·---·--:-·----,---.--·--;---. -. ---.:·--,__-:.,...·-. --. ------. -.----..--.. -='.""··-----·--.. -. ·...---.-.. -. ~ ·; /'. . .·• 0'~~-~-.-.. --··~l
"•1
>~
::
( ( (
}
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO• __ ~N_/A_·----~~~-------
C • 0 • NO • One ( 1)
~--~~--~--------~--~
CONTRACTOR : BELMONT ENGINEERING DAl"E January 12, 1984
~------~~------------~------~
SAFETY PLATFORMS AT BELT FILTER PRESSES, RECLAMATION PAiNT NO. 1, DOB NO. PW-107
$ o.oo Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) -------------------In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from 1:he contract price are hereby approved.
The original plans for construction permjtted the'Contractor 60 calendar
days .to complete all of the specified work. As a result.of actions taken
by the Districts during the maintenance of operations at the Dewatering
Facility, the·Contractor's limited access was denied on several occasions •
. The Contractor has been granted an extension of time to cover the delays.
ADDED COSTS: $0.00 EXTtNSION OF TIME: ·42 Calendar Days
It is mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 42 days
approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect,
incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred
'..,,_/ by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
October 3, 1983
60 Calendar Days
December 2, 1983
42 Calendar Days
42 Calendar Days
102 Calendar Days
January 12, 1984
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$
$
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $
Amended Contract Price $
32,156.00
0.00
0.00
32,156.00
Board authorization date: February 8, 1984 Approved:
II C"
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS.OF
Orange County, California
AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS
Chief Engineer
"C"
'
.,
Ii
RESOLOTION N0 •. 84-12
ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-107·AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLU'l'ION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEP'?ING
SAFETY PLA'l'FO;RMS AT BELT. FILTER PRESSES, RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-107, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING
FINAL CLOSEOOT·AGBEEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE:, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Belmont Engineering, has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Safety Platforms at
Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107, on January 12, 19841 and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the
contract, which said reconunendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-107, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms
of the contract therefor, dated October 3, 1983, and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy.Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Belmont Engineering, setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Safety Platforms at Belt Filter
Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107, is hereby approved and accepted in
form approved by the General Counsel1 and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized
and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February a, 1984.
"D" AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "D"
"--11
RF.sOttrrION NO. 84-13
ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-108 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC'rS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7
AND 11 OF ORANGE COt'JN'rY, CALIFOBNIA, ACCEPTING
SLUDGE AND DIGESTER GAS PIPING, PLANT NO. 2, JOB
NO. PW-108, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT
AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 of Oranqe County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Kiewit Pacific Company, has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Sludqe and Digester Gas
Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, on January 21, 1984, and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the
contract, which said reconunendation is hereby received and ordered filed1 and,
Section 3. That Sludqe and Diqester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job N9. PW-108,
is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract
therefor, dated October 24, 1983, and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section s. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kiewit Pacific Company,
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Sludge and Digester Gas
Pipin9, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved
by the General Counsel; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized
"...._J and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOFrED at a regular meeting held February 8, 1984.
"E" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "E"
. ..
RFSOLOTION NO. 84-14
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. PW-118
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE.BOARDS OF DIRECTO:RS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, S,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF FOUR ( 4)
PB AND FOOR ( 4) CONDUCTIVI'l'Y ME'l'EBS FOR "C" BEADWORKS
INFLUEN'l' TRUNKS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-118
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * L.
The Boatds of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7
and 11 of orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section l. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts hereby
determine that the project for Installation of Four (4) pH and Four (4) Conductivity
Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-118, is exempt
from further CEQA requirements, in accordance with said Guidelines, and that
Secretary be authorized and directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the County
Clerk of the County of Orange~ and,
Section ?.. That the project for Installation of Four (4) pH and Four (4)
Conductivity Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-118,
is hereby approved, and that.the Secretary be directed to file any documents required
by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this
day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for Installation of
Four (4) pH and Four (4) Conductivity Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks at
Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-118, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
..... . , ...
of California1 and,
Section S. 'rhat the General Manaqer be authorized to __ establish the date and
.,_; time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read1 and,
Section 6. 'rhat the Secretary and the Districts• Deput.y._Chief Engineer be
authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards-of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOP'l'ED at a reqular meeting held February a, -1984.
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 84-15
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR WASTE GAS BURNERS AT TREATMENT
?LANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-121
A JOINT RFSOLO'l'ION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COCJNl?Y, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WASTE GAS BURNERS AT
TREA'l'MEN'l' PLAN'!' NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-121
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -" ' ii , ..
The Boards of Directors of cd~ty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section l. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts hereby
determine that the project for construction of Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. PW-121, is exempt from further CEQA requirements, in accordance with
said Guidelines, and that Secretary be authorized and directed to file a Notice of ~
Exemption with the County Clerk of the County of Orange: and,
Section 2. That the project ~or construction of Waste Gas Burners at Treatment
. !
Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-121, is her~by approved, and that the Secretary be directed
to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California
. Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as am~nded; and·,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this
day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for construction of
Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-121, are· hereby approved and
adopted; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State
of California, and,
Section S. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
.. . . ,.
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Dis~ricts' Deputy Chief Engineer be
""'-' authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOP'rED at a regular meeting held February a, 1984.
f. ,\
I
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
J'H"
COUNTY SANITATION DtS"FRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108.W ~LLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALJ.~, CALIFORNIA·9271\8
January 25, 1984
36
c11.-> s.-0-2910 \_,,)
(71.-) 962-24' 11
TO:
~ SUBJECT:
'(
MEMORANDUM
Bill Butler
Bid Specification A-116, Six (6) 1/2 Ton
Pickup Trucks
Sealed bids were received and opened on January 24, 1984,
for furnishing and delivering six (6) 1/2 ton mid-size pick-
up trucks.
The bid tabulations are as follows:
ComEan:t Price
1. GMC Truck & Coach $ 45,900.12
Los Angeles
2. Theodore Robins Ford 46,192.68
Costa Mesa
3. Chick Iverson, Inc. 48,679.44
Newport Beach
4. Cormier Delillo Chevrolet 50,112.54
Huntington Beach
s. McCoy & Mills Ford 50,127.29
Fullerton
award be made to GMC Truck and Coach for
unt of $45,900.12 including sales tax.
been budgeted for this purchase.
TH/yh
:u;~
William ··N. ·Clark_e,
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "H"
v
II I II
January 24, 1984
37
TO: Bill Butler
MEMORANDUM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC)~
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108-« ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71•0 540-2910
(714) 962-24'11
SUBJECT: Bid Specification No. A-117, One (1) 4-Wheel
Drive Jeep
One sealed bid was received and opened on January 24, 1984,
for furnishing and delivering one 4-wheel drive jeep for the
Laboratory Division.
'The price breakdown is as follows:
Brian Chuchua's Jeep, Inc.
Base Price: $8,400.00
Sales Tax: 504.00
$8,904.00
The bid also offered a 1978 jeep as trade-in. The trade-in
offer was $1,250. The wholesal~ price in.the Kelly Blue Book
is $3, 400. It is recommended tnat the Districts reject the
trade-in of fer and reassign the vehicle for other use or sell
it at the next equipment sale for an amount not less than
$1,300.
It is recommended that the award be made to Brian Chuchua' s
TH/yh
Concur,
for their bid price of $8, 904. 00 including sales
ient funds have been budgeted for this purchase.
e is $80 higher than the 1983 model jeep purchased
& Property
'Vi~~Clarke
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II
CouNTY SANITATION D1s:rR1ci:sj
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA :
... January 24, 1984
38
TO: Bill Butler
MEMORANDUM
P.O. BOX 8127
108..W ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910 .\w)
(714) 962-2-411
SUBJECT: Bid Specification Noo A-118, One (1) 2-Ton Flat Bed
Truck
Sealed bids were received and opened on January 24, 1984, for furnish-
ing and delivering· one (1) 2-ton flat bed truck for the Collection
Facilities Division.
The bid tabulations are as follows:
Company Price
lo GMC Truck & Coach $14,860.14
Los Anc:reles
2. Theodore Robins Ford 14,956.60
Costa Mesa
3. Rafferty Intl. Trucks Inc 15,415.05
Anaheim
4 McCoy & Mills Ford 17,869.46
Fullerton
It is recommended the award be made to GMC Truck & Coach for their
total low. · amount of $14,860.14 including sales tax. Sufficient
-~/5-Ve~eted for this purchase.
Ted ~Iman
Chief of Procurement & Property
TH/yh
Concur,
v11etJ,
William N. Clarke
Superintendent
II J" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II J"
-...._;
January 25, 1984
37
TO: Bill Butler
MEMORANDUM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAUEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-24 11
SUBJECT: Bid Specification A-119, One 3/4 Ton Cab & Chassis
-with Utility Type Service Bod~ ..
l~ ., ~
l
Sealed bids were received for furnishing and delivering of one
3/ 4 ton cab & chassis with a utility type serv.ice body for the
Instrumentation Division.
The tabulations are as follows:
Company Price
1. Theodore Robins Ford $ 11,363.20
Costa Mesa
.2. Jerry Goodwin Dodge 11,443.76
Fullerton
3. GMC Truck & Coach 11,549.76
Los Angeles
.4. San Gabriel Ford 11,725.72
San ·Gabriel
.-5. McCoy & Mills Ford 12,207.41 I
Fullerton I I. -
-I
6. Cormier Delillo Chev. 12,745.53
Huntington Beach
. It is recommended the bid from Theodore Robins Ford be rejected be-
cause it does not comply with Districts' specifications. It is
further recommended that the award be made to Jerry Goodwin Dodge,
low· bidder m specifications for their proposed amount of
$11, 4.473. 7 ales tax. Sufficient funds have been bud-
g~/ fo
~ / /.'
CA~~d H
Chief ment & Property
TH/yh
Concur,
V11~
William N. Clarke
Superintendent -
"K" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "K"
l ADDENDUM January 24, 1984
11: OOA.M. . .
B I 0 TABULATION
S H E E T
SPECIFICATION NO. E-142
PROJECT TITLE DISTRICTS INFLUENT MAGNETIC REPLACEMENT FLOW METERS
.P~CT DESCRIPTION Furnish seven magnetic tyee flow meters complete with indi-
cators and totalizers including all necessary connections required.
ENGINEER'S ESTIMA'l'E -$~3~08....__,o~o~o_. ____________ _ BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------------------
REMARXS----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~===================~=======Q==========o==========================~=====o=======~
CONT!lACTOR TOTAL BID
:::r::---=====================~=====================================================
l. Ponton Industries, Inc.
Santa Fe Springs $ 119,022.00
·2. Fischer & Porter Company
Anaheim $ 130, 865. 00
3.
"L"
Heyer & Associates
San Diego $ 134,506.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that
the low bid is a ·responsible f?id.-.. I, therefore, recommend that the General
Manager be authorized to award this contract to Eonton Industries, Inc.
of Santa Fe Springs, California, in the bid amount of $119,022 plus
applicable sales tax, as the lowest and best bid.
VV1/~
William N. Clarke, Sr.
Superintendent
AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -ALL DISTRICTS "L"
RFSOLOTION NO. 84-18-3
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 3-2l-2R
A RESOLU'l'ION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTllACT FOR TRENCH RECONSTRUCTION,
LOS ALAMITOS BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 3-2l-2R
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 3 of Orange
County California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made to Richardson & Le Bouef Company for Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos
Boulevard, Contract No. 3-2l-2R, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for
said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
'-.-' Section 2. That the contract for Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos
Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-2R, be awarded to Richardson & Le Bouef Company in
the total amount of $213,699.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and
the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February a, 1984.
"M" AGENDA ITEM #9(0)(2) -DISTRICT 3 "M"
"N"
1 ADDENDUM January 24, 1984
ll:OOA.M.
BID TABULATION
SB EE T
CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2R
PROJECT TITLE TRENCH RECONSTRUCTION, LOS ALAMITOS BOULEVARD
PBOJECT DESCRIP!'ION Furnish all materials, equipment, supplies and labor for
trench reconstruction in Los Alamitos Boulevard from Rossmoor Way to Katella
Avenue in the City of Los Alamitos.
ENGINEER. s ESTIMATE __ $ __ 2_2s_, o_o_o _____ _ BUDGET AMOUNT $ __ 25_0_,_o_oo ___ _
=================================~==========~~~====================~~===========
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
========~======================a=======~==========================o=============
1. Richardson & Le Bouef Company
Santa Ana, CA $ 213,699.00
2. Copp Contracting Inc.
Whittier, CA $ 216,491.00
3. Fecit Strata Construction
Whittier, CA $ 221,663.50
4. Clarke Contracting Corp.
Compton, CA $ 224,387.75
5. Bowers Tractor Service, Inc.
Santa Ana, CA $ 233,580.95*
6. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.
Orange, CA $ 235,584.40
7. Griffith Company
Santa Ana, CA $ 238,120.38
8. Blair Paving, Inc.
Anaheim, CA $ 243,943.70
9. Excel Paving Company
Long Beach, CA $ 244,759.90
10. Russco Construction, Inc.
Hawaiian Gardens, CA $ 266,570.38
11. Peter C. David Company
Garden Grove , CA $ 303,865.50
12. CK Pump & Dewatering Corp.
Long Beach, CA $ 311,730.40
* Errors in calculations
I have reviewed the proposal submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Richardson and
Le Bouef Canpany of Santa Ana, California, in the bid amount of $213,699.00 as
the lowest and best bid. fl~,o~
Thomas M. Dawes
Deputy Chief Engineer
AGENDA ITEM #9(0)(2) -DISTRICT 3 "N"
. 'V
Pa9e 1 of 2
CatJN'!Y SANITATION DIS'l'RIC'l'S OP oRANGB·cotJNT!
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVBNtJE
FOtlNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNll 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. 2 ---------------------· -···co NTRA CTO R: Russco Construction, Inc. DATE January 16, 1984
. ·-~· .. -· .. ---REHABILITATION AND RELOCATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER FROM BAY
JOB: BRIDGE PUMP STATION TO COVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-lSR (REBID)
Amount of this Chan9e Order (Add) (Bedttet) $ 9,988.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
1. The Contractor is directed to install three (3) mechanical
pipe supports at the Dover Drive vault and three (3) con-
crete block pipe supports at the Bay Bridge Pump Station
vault, in accordance with Field Change Order No. l and
Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, for the lump sum
amount of •••• $ 2,555.73
2. The Contractor is directed to install thrust blocks at
Station 53+98. 92. (two), and increase size of thrust blocks
at Station 48+58.26, all in accordance with Field Change
Order No. 3 and Section 10-4 of the General Provisions,
for the lump sum amount of ••••
3. The force main crossing of the Opper Newport Bay was found
to be 2 feet northerly of the location shown on the Plans.
· ~he pipeline location was discovered after the shoring was
installed. The Contractor is allowed extra charges for
modifying the shoring, removing additional material, dewater-
inq charges, and securing a special machine to fuse the pipe
which would fit into the limited work space, all in accordance
with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions and as detailed
below. The Contractor is allowed four (4) days extension
of time for this additional work.
Labor $ 3,688.10
Equipment @ 85% of State Rate 1,523.20
Extra Charge for Special Fusion Equipment 770.00
$ 5,981.30 $
TOTAL ADD: $
1,450.97
5,981.30
9,988.00
===========
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 5 "0-1"
Page 2. of 2
comt:u SANI1?ATION DIS'l'BIC'l'S OF ORANGE . COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOtJNTllR VALLEY, CALIJ'ORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
c. o. N0._ ....... 2 _______ _
CONTRAC'l'OR: Russco Construction, Inc. DATE January 16, 1984
REHABILITATION AND RELOCATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER FROM BAY
JOB: BRIDGE PUMP STATION TO DOVER DRIVE, CON'!RACT NO. 5-lSR (REBID)
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Bedttet} $ 9,988.00
4. The Con~ractor is allowed a 8 day time extension for delays
incurred by rain storms which flooded the project site, in
accordance with the· following table:
Date of Storm
12-09-83
12-27-83
Additional work outlined in Item No. 3
Total
Calendar
Days Lost
6
2
8 Calendar Days
__i_ Calendar Days
12 Calendar Days
====
The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to
the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the
previously approved time extensions and 4 additional days granted hereby. It is,
therefore, ~utually agreed that no time extension other than the~ days total ap-
proved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, inci-\,,.)
dental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by
contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this c.o.
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date:
'l'OTAL TIME EXTENSION:
May 9, 1983
210 Calendar Days
December 4, 1983
12 Calendar Days
52 Calendar Days
262 Calendar Days
January 25, 1984
12 Calendar Days
================
Original Contract Price $ 836,585.40
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 2,990.45
This Change (Add) (Bed12ctr $ 9, 988. oo
Amended Contract Price $ 849,563.85
February 8, 1984
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
OR..VIGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By 1/30/84 By __ ~------------------~l/~3~0/~8;:;..;.4
Deputy Chief Engineer RUSSCO CONSTRUCTION INC/Contractor
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 5 "0-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 84-19-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO TBE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 119 -ROBERTS ANNEXATION)
A RF.sOLCTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF 'I'ERRITORY TO
TBE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 119 -ROBERTS
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
* * * * * * * * * * • • * • * • *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition
filed by the property owner1 and,
Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965)
~ of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has
heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Cormnission for annexation of said
te~ritory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by LeRoy G. Roberts, the owner of said
property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 83-148-7, filed with said
Commission by the District1 and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 119 -Roberts Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of
this resolution1 and,
section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and,
Section S~ That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory, and,
Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) --DISTRICT 7 "P-1"
amount of $3,228.00 has been satisfied1 and,
Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (l) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies1 and
Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation
Commission pursuant to Division l (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6
of the GovernmJnt Code, Section SS461, the territory hereinbefore referred to and
I
described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation
District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 8, 1984.
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -DISTRICT 7 "P-2"
-.......Q-1"
January 25, 1984
STAFF REPORT
Acquisition of Easement
. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962·2411
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer,
Garden Grove Boulevard to Garden Grove Freeway
~.i
In 1973, County Sanitation District No. 2 installed the Santa Ana River l1
Interceptor Sewer between Reclamation Plant No. l and Katella under Contract No.
2-14-1. This federally funded interceptor sewer was built to the county line
where future extensions by upstream dischargers are still being installed. The
sewer was installed under Permit No. 15171 from the Orange County Flood Control
District for those portions within their Santa Ana River right-of-way.
Between Garden Grove Boulevard and Garden Grove Freeway, the sewer was installed
in flood <:0ntrol easements. Development of a parcel of land bordered by City
Drive on the west, the San~a Ana River on the east, Garden Grove Boulevard on
the south, and Garden Grove Freeway on the· north is now in progress. In this
reach, it has been determined that the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer was not
constructed within the easement in accordance with the design plans. Surveys by
the developer and confirmed by the Oranqe County Surveyor at staff's request,
have determined that portions of the sewer are westerly of the flood control
easement, partially within private property. The necessary easement is approxi-
mately 1,500 feet lonq by 30 feet in width.
Approximate~y 75 percent of the proposed easement overlies the existing flood
control easement granted to the County of Orange, the remainder is not encum-
bered by the flood control easement. Other small easements owned by the City of
Orange and MWD also encumber portions of the proposed easement. The at~ached
map shows the location of the sewer, the private property, and the flood control
easements.
The owner of the property has indicated a willingness to neqotiate the sale of
an easement to County Sanitation District No. 2 for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor. Staff and General Counsel have met with the developer to discuss
the acquisition of the easement. These neqotiations are still in progress and
an updated status report will be presented to the Boards at the meetinq at which
time the General Counsel will advise the Directors of any Board action that
would be appropriate.· ·
Attachment
AGENDA ITE~ #28CA) -DISTRICT 2 "Q-1"
"Q-2"
PROPO·SED EASEMENT
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEP·TOR SEWER.
CE. GARDEN .GROVE ~R_E_E_W_A_Y_2~-------
6
~
NO SCALE
PRIVATE
PROPERTY
~GARDEN GROVE BLVD .. J
LEGEND
R$QOd FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT
~ FLOOD CONTROL FEE
PROPOSED SANI r A TJO·N DIS TRIC r EASEMENT
AGE:~DP. ITEr-1 #28(A) -DISTRICT 2 II()_') II
RESOLUTION NO. 84-16
APPROVING PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION
NO. 65 -FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 13 AND REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY
REORGANIZATION NO. 65 -FORMATION OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 AND REORGANIZATION OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 7, AND
DIRECTING THAT A PROPOSAL THEREFOR BE FILED WITH
THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATtON COMMISSION OF 01'...?\NGE ,. t,
COUNTY I
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *·*
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 of
Orange County, California, do hereby determine that:
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, have
entered into an agreement with the County of Orange pursuant to which, among
other things, the County Sanitation Districts are obligated to undertake the
""'-' connnencement of processes necessary for the formation of a new County Sanitation
District (to be designated County Sanitation District No. 13)7 and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, along
I
• -• I with the Boa~n of.Directors of County San~tation District No~ 7, have considered
I
the feasibility of a new County Sanitation District, which will include certain
territories presently located in County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 together
with territories not presently located within any Sanitation District7 and,
WHEREAS, these Boards of Directors proposed the initiation of proceedings
with the Local Agency Formation Conunission of Orange County (LAFCO) to be
designated "PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO. 65 -FORMATION OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 AND REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 2 AND 7 (including Detachment No. 4 -Upper K, Travis and Bryant Ranches
from District No. 2, and Detachment No. 9 -Tract No. 9606 from District
No. 7)"7 and,
"R-1" AGENDA ITEM #29Cc) -DISTRICTS 2 & 7 "R-1"
WHEREAS, these Boards of Directors have approved an initial study and
directed the preparation of an environmental impact report which is being
finalized.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2 and 7 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER, as follows:
Section 1. That these Boards of Directors hereby approve and request the
initiation of proposed proceedings with LAFCO as set forth and described in the
Justification of Proposal Questionnaire, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to this
resolution, which said document is incorporated herein by this reference1 and,
Section 2. That these Boards of Directors hereby request approval of the
herein described proposal by LAFCOJ and,
Section 3. That the General Manager, General Counsel and their designees
of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 are hereby authorized and directed
to file PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO. 65 -FORMATION OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 AND REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 2 AND 7, as soon as possible, and to take all further necessary appropriate
.actions to obtain the approval of LAFCO and the formation of County Sanit~~ion
District No. 13.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 8, 1984.
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(c) -DISTRICTS 2 & 7 "R-2"
-..
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, ~' 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 .
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
. JANUARY 11, 1984
ADl\fiNISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS A VENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
l, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on January 11, 1984, at. 7:30 p.m.,
in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the
roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7
and i1 as ·follows:
\._I
DISTRICT NO. 1:
~~STRICT NO. 2:
DISTRICT NO. 3:
DISTRICT NO. 5:
DISTRICT NO. 6:
DISTRICT NO. 7:
~ DISTRICT NO. 11:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
_!__Robert Hanson, Chairman
_!,_Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem
_!__Don Saltarelli
_!__Roger Stanton
_!,_Henry Wedaa, Chairman
_!__Don Roth, Chairman pro tem
_!,__Barbara Brown
_!__Sam Cooper
_!__Dan Gr iset
_!__Donald Holt
_!__Carol Kawanami
x Bob Perry
x Don Smith
_!,_Roger Stanton
_!__Dorothy Wedel
_!__Duane Winters
_!__Bruce Finlayson, Chairman
_!__Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tem
_!,_Barbara Brown
_!__Norman Culver
_!__Henry Frese
x Victor Grgas
X-Don Griffin
x Dan Griset
x Frank Marshott
Carrey Nelson
_!__Don Roth
x Roger Stanton
x Charles Sylvia
_!__John A. Thomas
x Dorothy Wedel
x Duane Winters
x Evelyn Bart, Chairman
x Ruthelyn Plununer, Chairman pro tem
_!__Roger Stanton
x James Wahner, Chairman
x Evelyn Bart, Chairman pro tem
_!__Roger Stan ton
x Don Smith, Chairman
X-Evelyn Bart, Chairman pro tem
x Richard Edgar
...,.L_Dan Griset
x Roger Stanton
X-Bill Vardoulis
x James Wahner
x Ruth Bailey, Chairman
x Ron Pattinson
_!__Roger Stanton
-2-
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
Orma Crank
Robert Luxembourger
Ronald Boesterey
Harriett Wieder
_Todd Murphy
____ E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr.
____ Marvin P. Adler
_____ carrey Nelson
Robert Luxembourger
----Robert Kuznik
Wi_lliam Odlum
--~Norman Culver
Gene Beyer
----Harriett Wieder
John Holmberg
____ Buck Catlin
Richard Olson
Richard Partin
Marvin P. Adler
Bob Perry
Norma Seidel
Joyce Risner
_____ Jesse Davis
____ Robert Luxembourger
____ Charles J. Rell
_!__Sam Cooper
E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr.
-----Harriett Wieder
Anthony R. Selvaggi
____ Robert P. Mandie, Jr.
John Holmberg
Buck Catlin
Philip Maurer
----Jacqueline Heather
Harriett Wieder
Steven Smith
----Philip Maurer
----Harriett Wieder
Gene Beyer
Philip Maurer
Ronald Hoesterey
----Robert Luxembourger
Harriett Wieder
_Larry Agran
_Harry Green
Don MacAllister
----Don MacAllister
Harriett Wieder
1/11/84
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General
Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Tom
Dawes, Bill Clarke, Blake Anderson, Rita
Brown, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young,
Bob Ooten
Thomas t. Woodruff, General Counsel, Walt
Howard, Harvey Hunt, Darrel Cohoon
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICTS 1, 3, 6 & 7
Receive and file minute excerpts
re Board Appointments
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the minute excerpts from the
following re election of mayor,
appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor)
Agency District(s)
City of Cypress 3
Costa Mesa Sanitary 1
District 6
7
Midway City
Sanitary District 3
DISTRICT 1
Election of Chairman pro tem
Active Director Alternate Director
Gerald Mullen Richard Partin*
Robert Hanson Orma o. Crank
James Wahner Steven R. Smith
James Wahner Harry s. Green
Bruce Finlayson Richard Olson
Joint Chairman Holt announced that the
City of Santa Ana's Director, Vice Mayor
Dan Griset, had recently replaced Mayor
Robert Luxembourger on the District 1 Board of Directors. Since Mayor
Luxembourger was the Chairman pro tem of the District, Joint Chairman Holt called
for election of a new Chairman pro tem. Director Griset was then nominated and
elected as Chairman pro tem of the District.
DISTRICT 6 Chairman Holt advised the District 6
Election of Chairman Directors that due to the retirement
last month of Chairman Elvin Hutchison,.
he was calling for the election of a new Chairman for the District. Director
James Wahner was then nominated and elected as Chairman of the District.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held December 14, 1983, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2
Aeproval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held December 14, 1983, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There b~ing no corrections or amendments
Aeproval of Minutes to the minutes of th'e regular meeting
held December 14, 1983, the Chairman '.,.).
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-3-
.-
i/ll/84
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held December 14, 1983, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held December 14, 1983, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
~. held December 14, 1983, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held December 14, 1983, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that the
Report of the Joint Chairman General Manager was presently in
Washington, D.C. working to obtain
legislative approval for the Districts' proposed deep ocean sludge disposal
research project.
Chairman Holt advised the Directors that the Districts had received a letter from
Carol Onorato, Chairwoman of the California State Water Resources Control Board,
thanking the Directors for their support of the proposed Clean Water Bond Act of
1984. He then read excerpts from the letter to the Directors.
Chairman Holt announced that the District 13 Steering Committee would meet on
Wednesday, January 18, at 5:30 p.m.
·The Joint Chairman also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, January 25, at 5:30 p.m. Directors John Thomas and Bill Vardoulis
were invited to attend and participate in the discussions.
ALL DISTRICTS
Commending Walt Garrison, retiring
Chief Engineer/General Manager,
LACSD, for outstanding public
service
Mr. Holt reported that Walter E.
Garrison, Chief Engineer and General
Manager of the Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts, was retiring after
35 years of service with the Sanitation
Districts. He observed that Mr.
Garrison had cooperated
public service record.
with our Districts over the years and had an outstanding
It was then moved, seconded and unanimously carried:
That Resolution No. 84-10, commending Walter E. Garrison, retiring Chief Engineer
and General Manager of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, for his
cooperation with the Orange County Sanitation Districts and his outstanding
contribution and dedication to public service, be, and is hereby, adopted.
Chairman Holt advised the Directors that the resolution would be presented to Mr.
Garrison at the CASA conference in Indian Wells in late January.
-4-
1/11/84
ALL DISTRICTS
ApPointment of Fiscal Policy
Committee Member
ALL DISTRICTS
Appointment of Building Committee
Member
The Joint Chairman announced the
appointment of Director Jim Wahner to
the Fiscal Policy Committee for a
two-year term.
Joint Chairman Holt announced that he
was appointing himself to the Building
Committee as he indicated that his
close, day-to-day working relationship
with the staff would enable him to provide valuable guidance to this Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS The Assistant General Manager reported
Report of the General Manager that the Districts' 30l(h) waiver
application is proceeding on schedule.
The co~tracts let by the ~1ards at the December 14, 1983 meeting to construct a
filtrate line at Plant No.:·1 from the belt filter presses to the secondary
junction box are moving ahead. The pipe has been delivered and the contractor
will start construction of the line on Monday,.January 16, 1984.
Mr. Sylvester reported that a notice for bids has been published for the metering
equipment the Districts committed to install. The EPA has already asked the
Districts to shorten the schedule for installation of the meters. Mr. Sylvester
indicated that the bids would be received on January 24, and advised the
Directors that it would be difficult to respond to the EPA request until the bids
are opened and analyzed.
The Assistant General Manager reported that the Request for Proposal (RFP) for
offsite reuse/disposal of the Districts' digested, dewatered sludge was issued on
December 14, 1983. Be indicated that inquiries had been received from 88 firms
or individuals who expressed interest in the RFP. He noted that the staff held a
technical review conference on January 9th to provide interested vendors an \..,)
opportunity to tour our facilities and ask questions regarding the RFP.
Thirty-three people attended the conference.
Mr. Sylvester then advised:the Directors that the Districts' NPDES permit hearing
I would be held on Friday, February 10, at 9:30 a.m. in the Santa Ana City Hall.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages "A",
"B" and •c•, attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so
indicated.
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self-Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRICT NO. l
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
-5-
12/07/83
$
52,817.68
$
12/14/83 12/28/83
422,561.87 $434,188.51
504,916.10 196,955.73
89,844.83 113,576.72
3,364.84 4,814.51
818.40
41,640.37 361.01
4,198.94 10,153.~
74,229.86 5,870.~
.·
0
1/11/84
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order A to
$52,817.68
88,225.89
5,277.13
3,063.80
$1,237,323.63
Moved, seconded and ~uly carried:
818.40
2,924.47
1,245.16
2,196.28
16.14
$773,938.94
Purchase Order No. 14655 to Marden That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
Susco re Job No. PW-102A to issue Change Order A to Purchase
Order No. 14655 issued to Marden susco,
decreasing.the amount by $2,094.56 due to substitution of tees for four cleanout
wyes~1nd elbows relative to purchase of Ductile Pipe, Fittings and Valves for
; Fil tr'.ate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102A.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing purchase order to
Cooper Energy Service for Repair of
No. 10 Engine at Foster Outfall
Booster Station, Specification
No. R-015
Booster Station, Specification No.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. PW-097
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
to issue a purchase order to Cooper
Energy Service in an amount not to
exceed $163,000.00 plus tax for Repair
of No. 10 Engine at Foster Outfall
R-015.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-1, approving
plans and specif !cations to Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and
Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-097, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the
date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
I
ALL DISTR~CTS
ApProving~plans and specifications
re Job No. PW-112
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-2, approving
plans and specifications for Office Partitions and Lavatory at Plant No. 2, Job
No. PW-112, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt
of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
ApProving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re
Job No. PW-105
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Security Fencing at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-105, requiring that the fabric for replacement
of the fence along the south property line shall be a green vinyl-coated 2-inch
mesh, and clarifying requirements for removal of the existing fence. A copy of
this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards.
-6-
1/11/84
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Job No. PW-105 to Crown
. Fence Company
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-3, to receive
and file bid tabulation and rcommendation, and awarding contract for Security
Fencing at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-105, to Crown Fence Company in the
amount of $47,697.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Job No. PW-109 to Val
Foth & Son's That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-4, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. lJ Job No. PW-109, to Val Foth &
Son's in the amount of $66,916.76. A certified ieopy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file letter from
Belmont Engineering protesting That the letter dated January 3, 1984,
award of Job No. PW-115 from Belmont Engineering, the second low
bidder for Job No. PW-115, Stairway and
Walkway Additions at Treatment Plant No. 2, protesting award of said job, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Rejecting protest of Belmont
Engineering re award of Job That the Boards of Directors hereby find
No. PW-115 that the protest of Belmont Engineering
re award of· Job No. PW-115, contract for ~
Stairway and Walkway Additions at Treatment Plant No. 2, is unsupportable and
without legal basis, and hereby reject said protest as recommended by the General
Counsel.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Job No. PW-115 to
Paramount Metal & Supply That the.Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-5, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Stairway and
Walkway Additions at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-115, to Paramount Metal &
Supply in the amount of $28,483.00. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing renewal of memberships
in CASA and AMSA for 1984 That the Boards of Directors hereby
authorize renewal of memberships in the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1984 calendar year, and approve
payment of annual dues of $1,650.00 and $4,781.00, respectively.
ALL DISTRICTS
Adjusting the salary range for
Chief of Industrial Waste
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-6, amending
-7-
1/11/84
Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, adjusting the salary
range for the position classification for Chief of Industrial waste from 1066G
($2723/3390) to 1068G ($3039/3784). A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter from the
City of Brea re sludge disposal at
Olinda or Olinda-Alpha landfills
Director Sam Cooper of Brea read a
letter to the Joint Boards from the City
opposing disposal of Districts' sludge
in either. the Olinda or Olinda-Alpha
landfills and requesting that the
Districts notify the Brea City Council by letter if the Districts ever consider
future use of these sites for sludge disposal. It was then moved, seconded and
duly carried:
That the letter from the C(ty of Brea dated January 11, 1984 re sludge disposal
in Olinda or Olinda-Alpha 1andfills be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
DISTRICTS 2 & 7
Approving Sewer Service Agreement
with M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc. and
the City of Yorba Linda
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-7, approving
Sewer Service Agreement with M.J. Brock
& Sons, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda relative to providing interim sewer
service to property that will be served by proposed District No. 13, when formed.
A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICTS 2 & 7
Approving Sewer Service Agreement
with Genstar Development, Inc. and
the City of Yorba Linda
Moved, seconded and duly carr~ed:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-8, approving
Sewer Service Agreement with Genstar
Development, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda relative to providing interim sewer
service to property that will be served by proposed District No •. 13, when formed.
A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m., January 11, 1984.
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file Selection
Committee certification re final
negotiated fee with Clifford A.
Forkert, Civil Engineer, re
Contract No. 3-28R
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, be,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Selection Conunittee
certification re final negotiated fee
with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil
Engineer, for design of Rehabilitation
of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Bolder
and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-a-
1/11/84
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving agreement with Clifford
A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, re That the Board of Directors hereby
design of Contract No. 3-28R adopts Resolution No. 84-9-3, approving
agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, \.,.)
Civil Engineer, for design of Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. -J-28R, on an hourly rate basis plus profit and direct
expense reimbursement for a total amount not to exceed $32,049.04. A certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a par~ of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m., January 11, 1984.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Receive and file Initial Study,
Environmental Impact Assessment
and Notice of Preparation of Envi-
ronmental Impact Report on Master
Plan Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Initial Study, Environmental
Impact Assessment and Notice of
Preparation of Environmental Impact
Report on the updated and consolidated
Master Plan Report for District No. 5
and the southern half of District No. 6, prepared in accordance with CEQA
Guidelines, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 5
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re
Contract No. 5-lSR
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation and
Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway
Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-lSR, authorizing
an addition of $2,990.45 to the contract with Russco Construction, Inc., for
additional slurry backfill required, repair of existing line at connection point
and purchase of fittings at the Districts' request, and granting a time extension
of 40 calendar days due to inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy
of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m., January 11, 1984.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m., January 11, 1984.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to write off
monies owed by Circuit E?CPress That the staff be authorized to write
off the amount of $1,947.25 owed by
Circuit Express, Inc., in connection with delinquent invoices re Industrial Waste
Permit No. 1-135, in accordance with the provisions of the Boards' bad debt ~
policy.
-9-
.1/11/84
DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7
Public Bearing on Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report on the Updated
and Consolidated Master Plan of
Trunk Sewers
This being the time and place fixed for
public hearing on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report on the
Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of
Trunk Sewers for District No. 1, the
northern half of District No. 6 and
District No. 7, the Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:53 p.m.
Verbal Report by EIR consultant
Larry Buxton of Courton & Associates reported that the draft EIR had been
sent out in accordance with CEQA guidelines. He indicated that most of the
impacts associated with carrying out the master plan proposals were related
to construction of the proposed lines, and included noise, traffic and
dust-related impacts. Mr. Buxton advised that the impacts would be
mitigated by appropriate measures, stated that there were no significant
archeological or biological impacts, and indicated that the proposed master
plan projects were growth-acconunodating rather than growth-inducing. He
further reported that possible ground water impacts identified by the Orange
County Water District relative to construction of one trunk line would be
identified in the EIR and could be effectively mitigated.
Receive and file written comments re the Draft EIR
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That written comments from the Orange County Water District and the City of
Santa Ana relative to the Draft EIR be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Close Public Hearing
The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 7:55 p.m.
DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7
Directing Staff and consultant to
prepare Final Environmental Impact
Report on the Updated and Consoli-
dated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers
for District No. 1, the northern
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and consultant are directed
to prepare the Final Environmental
Impact Report on the updated and
consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers
half of District No. 6 and District No. 7.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. l be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:56 p.m., January 11, 1984.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:56 p.m., January 11, 1984.
-10-
1/11/84
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file Staff Rep0rt re
the Master Plan of Sewer Facilities
for the 70th Sewer Maintenance
District
received and ordered filed.
DISTRicr 7
Receive and file the Master Plan
of Sewer Facilities for the 70th
Sewer Maintenance District
filed, and7
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report summarizing the
Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for the
70th Sewer Maintenance District of the
County of Orange be, and is hereby,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Master Plan of Sewer Facilities
for the 70th Sewer Maintenance District
be, and is hereby, received and ordered
FURTHER MOVED: That the Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for the 70th Sewer
Maintenance District be forwarded to the Orange County Board of Supervisors,
governing board of the 70th Sewer Maintenance District.
DISTRIC? 7
Receive, file and deny claim of
Richard E. Figley re damages caused
by a sewer backup
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the claim of Richard E. Figley
dated December 7, 1983, in the amount of
$1,160.97 for alleged damages as a
result of a sewer backup at his residence located at 1822 Sirrine Drive in Santa
Ana, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, and1
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim is denied and referred to the Districts'
liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file Summons and Com-
plaint re Case No. 41-62-69,
Cravens, Dargan & Company vs. CSD
re two previous claims for damages
due to a sewer backup
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Summons and Complaint relative
to Case No. 41-62-69, Cravens, Dargan &
Company vs. County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, et al., in connection
with two previous claims for alleged
damages due to a sewer backup at the Versailles on the Lake apartment complex
located at 3600 South Plaza Drive in Santa Ana, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed, and7
FURTHER MOVED: That said Summons and Complaint be referred to the Districts'
General Counsel for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7 The Deputy Chief Engineer reported that
Study and Report on facilities the Irvine Business Complex had been
required to serve exPanding undergoing major changes in the past few
development in the Irvine Business years. Mr. Dawes indicated that
Complex area approximately sixteen miles of trunk
sewers serve the area now, but he
advised that these lines had been designed and constructed to support a much lower
density of development than is now being planned for the area. He reported that
during the design phase of the Airport Relief Trunk, the engineers had identified
proposed developments including 9,200,000 square feet of office space and 4,000
hotel rooms. Since many of the lines presently serving the area were constructed
ten to fifteen years ago, they are clearly inadequate to serve this rapidly \..J
expanding area.
-11-
'l/11/84
Mr. Dawes recommended that a study be conducted to establish future facilities
requirements for sewerage service to the area. Be anticipated that the study
could be completed in time for presentation at the February meeting. Based on
the outcome of the study it may be necessary to recommend establishment of a
separate zone for the Complex and implementation of higher connection fees to
finance the required facilities in accordance with the District's long-standing
policy of requiring new users to pay for the facilities needed to serve them.
DISTRICT 7
Authorizing purchase order to -
Boyle Engineering Corporation re
study and preparation of a report
on the sewerage facilities reguire-
ments in the Irvine Business
Complex area
Moved, seconded and 4uly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
to issue a purchase order to Boyle
Engineering Corporation in an amount not
to exceed $5,100.00 for study and
preparation of a report on the
collection facility' requirements for the
expanding development in the Irvine Business Complex area and possible
establishment of a separate zone and connection fees to finance any added
facilities required to serve this area.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Agreement with Electro-
lurgy, Inc. Pertaining to I.W.
Permit No. 7-162
The General Counsel referred Directors
to a supplemental staff report in their
folders regarding a stipulated agreement
with Electrolurgy. Mr. Woodruff
indicated that he and the staff had met
with Electrolurgy representatives and prepared an agreement which had been signed
by the company. The agreement resolves the Electrolurgy appeal of a
non-compliance penalty invoice continued from the December, 1983 meeting, and
staff and the General Counsel recommended approval of the agreement.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-11-7, approving
Agreement with Electrolurgy, Inc. Pertaining to Industrial Waste Permit
No. 7-162. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:00 p.m., January 11, 1984.
1, 2, 3
-12-
FUND NO 9199 -JT OIST wc~~ING CAPITAL --.. ·-r .. -4_:-:-· .-... ·----···-·-· ... -·-·· ···--. ·-:-""-...... --................. , ....... -···-·--.... -------.... _. __ _ .-,.--.... P.R.Q~t;$~.1 ~~-!lb.IL. U.lP.U.Jl.~ .... .e.A2.t..,_-r_.J,,_.~ .. -. ···-1'""---··~·M-~-~~ . REPORT NUMaER AP't3 .. ; . · .. ·' · : · · · . ; ... : ·,; · ... ·t:-:;:.: ·· 1•·1 : .. . . . . . . . .• :. " : .... . . } . •: ... '
COUNTY ~AN~TATJON DISTRICTS OF OIUNGE COUNTY . · . ·.. . . . . · . ·.'·: ~'. '.:'.'· ; ·~:;D::~·:;-:
_____ ------·---------··~----------~!f'l~.fAHLHlJHJ..fn. ______ ~····--·-.. --.-· ·., '/::· '
z··
1-[]•• IJARR ANT NO. VENOOf< AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
(
I ,1·-.. --o-6f,"''f8'1 _____ ------·.,--FR-EHPNl-i t\t'ft;i~fffvccf;sITTiElf'--··-·-· ---· . .
-·· ·---·i5·2·~-ar1: 6-,i'------· [o~t~·Actoij·-rw-:;:·t>~ra-· -·--"7""·--.,.-.. ~-~-· ----
I•
II
111
II
ll
u
"
·~·
·~
II
II
lY
II
ll
"· 1•' ,,
" ,,
,.
"'
Ill
--·--· ··------·--· ______ :..._.. -1:~
II
------·----·--···------------·---To'f AL-ITT1 "s f' A ToTifio 1193·-··---· ·· ·-s:s·2-;iff1·:·6a-····· -· --· · · ·--·--· ·· ... _. _ ... ·· · -··
SUHHARY
CORF
TOTA~ C~AtH~ P.AI~ ·1i/Q7/8J
----------------.. -----·-·---···-------------·
----------------------------------
AHOU NT ··------·. __ -------·----------.. -----··-·-
$52.Sli.68
·~
II
~I
II
IJ
II
~--------· --·-·------.----... ~··---~--____ ., ______________ . ..,, _____ .... ___ --------. . . ~
$~2.817.68
: :· ". !
-· .. \ _ .. ________ _ .. ·--~ -----·-·---·-·--------------.. ----------------·-·
-... ' .. , __ ._ ··-·. ·-·--.. ···-·-··-· ··--·---... .,. --~--...... ·---·-· ----....... -... -·-· ·----····-.. ---·-· ··-··· -... --.. -
----------···---·-·-----------------·-·---------·-··'-·-··-----·----· -----------···--
..
II
14
!n
·---------· .. ·-··--·----.......... . ·-·· ·---~---·-· --·-·-· -·-:-""' ----·.·-·---·· ---···---.· ·----.. -----------··.----·:'.-~--:-_ -·~--:--·~· .... ,~;
;.
~ ,.,I l• -~~
: --·-.. ···-· . -· ......... ______ ··-.-··-···------·--·-·· .. ··-·-···-·--------··--.·-·-·--·---------·--··· .. ------------·---··-.. -----·~------.. ----·---.., .. -~~-----, •. ..., ...... '"'.--······-·7·-~ .. --~·----·-.. ·--.. -. -~--~------.~-"" .--~· ·1~
:rJ . " • . . . I"' :: --·---··----------·---·---------·-----------------~~:~~~--~~---=~-~-~~~-~==~~~=~-=-=~=·~]~1
IU
.., 'U .·,j.
"
~
12 ----·----··-·-··--···------·-·--".'----.. -7 -~-r~---,-~---~~:_.-z,I2I , ~
"' !
:1_
\ ~: -----· ...... _ -. ·-----__ .. --------------. --··--· .. -·-·· . ·, ! ~.
. . ·----=-·------···-··---~--.-·-·---~----1':~1
. . . ' ~ " . ,.,
• ~ I -I!.
. ,· ~. 1: 1, •. ,
( ( ('
•.' ···1
-·
i··
. FUNO ~-~-:-( ~~--~--~!._.°._~-:_~---~~~--~-~~---~~-~-) T ~.::--------.-----·-·-----·-·-· ... ~.__( . ··-··---·-·----~~~~~~-S.~~~B~:-~p!~!.-~-~~-~:-~~~--~-~~. (
pOUNTY SANITATION OlSl~ICTS Of OR~NGt COUNTY . . ... · . . .
_____ ._c_L A_I_. t1_S p ~.!.r~_.!2!u182______ . •'
:·~r--
I • . o-e;fnf0:a· ~----AqM-e:~:n-rR·ornc~-.--·rnc:-.--~---··-~-·-·----.-~-.. -·-.. r-----i·r;-50·•·-rr·---~-------~~·EcTf\TCM.-~urn-r~$·~-:----:·"T"'~~-~~~;::~::7<-· :
Pf,68!>3 ~PVA.NCEp ~ff ICE SE~V,l(:E~ · . • Hil~.3CJ : OFFIH ~UPf'l-1~§. . " ·· :·.::: , ":.: ... :: ... · ' ...
Qfi68~'t M-~T$TATt; YEHICl-ES, tNp, . n,~21t.9? vrnlCLE L~A~ltiG . . . ,':· .. ·.· . ' .': ..
tr&-e·os Ai:-rtrA""l3(TA co. . . ·---rnt""931J. 28 -usE-CHAR'Gc-OVE'RPAYHENT-· ----·-.
) 4
]I• l.!ARRANT NO. Vl NOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
C66806 AMERICAN DISTRICT 1£LEGRAPH $81.56 ALARM SYSTEM MAINTENANCE h_.~-mm >_;_·.··~:)~_~-m~~~-~.~q~~c-;~r~~l:~*.'.I,>_·~:.~>-... '.-.. _ -.--~ :r~:.;:i::~ .. ,. ~~~-mrnt--: -:··:~\ ::-·-... -·· .. ·~~~~-~tHri~::~~~~:~~ .. ~~~:: ··_?'7_-.r.:.::-.:.·.'?_._-~_:_T · ;>r. .. J.· . 0Ha10 · .. -.. J,. ALAN ARMOlJR co, ... ,. _ _._. :/·'"; .· . : .. .-:. .. : . u,110,pp · -. : ·.Roof REPAtR.s ....... ·:·,,-. :._ ·f·_ ... • . .r;·: .. :.,
-:..~-(rtrt;ttl --u·tt1t\i"''frlSCOt ltce. n·4-;5 BEAR"rNC-SUPPL-rrs--·-----·--------........,;._-~
" 06~812 RANOOLFH AUSTIN CO. i•90.27 TUBING
11 OC.£.Bl3 AUTOCON 1NOUSTRl£St INC. :S.331309.00 · PLANT /J2 COMPUTER 11
.
" ----066 .. ·o-u_.·--. ·.-. -·---oAtlC-0~. f("~t't;~t.·t.RO-HE~. "'.'-... -.· -.~ .. :·. --. ·------.. --~-----i~f9H;3i~,.._--. -.. ~.----·us~·-~HAf\G· .. E'"QYERPAYM._Hff'"····---'."'---.-----:-.--.. -. ~~ .. ~. ·· .. ·.·._:_,.,
10 ~6~811:1 · BAt(f:R, Pt.YIH>OP COn · lNC11 .. , ·. ·· · -. ·. f505,7lt · .. · · " ~HAL~ t1AROWAR~ · · · . · . · . .-, .-. .' .-.,:-"
11 , '1~6BJ6 · BECKMAN 11\STRUt\EtHS.:-:< .. · .· ! _,,· . ~67 13.03;_,• ·.'. · EL~CTRl~AL SUPP'-ln:· ;:_ .· · · .··. · ... ·. · .. ' ._,·,;._::;;
112 -nfiE181'7 6E'VC1'.I . . . ·s79-;-{J'{;' EtECTRTC-C.ARr PARrs--·-------·-. ..:....... . ..:..-----..:...-.. I'>
~ 066818 BIG aox RENTAL co. $lt26o.ac TRASH DISPOSAL
~ 066819 ORJSTOL FlBERLIT£ lNO. $165.36 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
"--06~-~~o--· -..... _,--···buRK~-C"Qrtc;rrnc···A·c-~~-uPtn i·~~:-:-. ----. -~.--. --. -. -·-~·-·-·~·---r-~~ ~-6·;3p-·· ·nu' ~·onHi-MAHR·1p.n··~--;· ... ~---:-:-.----c:---.-· .--.-. ~-:-·;7·.
0(>68n . c;Ap f ORN I A ~UPft~S$ ~ PN &Y~H H~ . . . ; . $l~P.. 0 0 . ttALO~ f rn~ ~IJP~RES s 19 .. ~Y~T~M "'"' N.H~f\~H '. .•;." . JI'
Of.6822 CALIF, WOCPWC>RKJN(? t1ACHINERY Slf2.'t5 TOOi-$ . . ·' ·., :·. . · .. ;' · .-._.;':~ :1
" -ot>6•623 ctOHN-C-AR-o-t:'l:O-·[NG' --S-6i'1JTZ;-5' -n-=2FoST1'RT:.:up-AN'DIR"ATN-1 NG ___________ "
~ C6,82q CH£HW£ST INOUSTRlESt INC. $8.527.00 FERRIC CHLORIDE SVSTEH INSTALLATION/START-UP ~
~ ~ ~66825 CHERRY FASTENING SYSTEMS $38'1.50 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT :
l• -tx:rue: 6e·2f.:i--.. ··-· -:--·:-·--·<:ttt:VR~rr·v-;-o.-A...-r ... • Ne ... · .. · , , . -~---_ --.. ·· : ··; .. · .. ,. ·. fn-y-1u··1rr·u""';'.7~~--·"7·G·M·o1; rtff""-'7~·-···-··--····-::.:-~.·-:-=:,.----:---,,-~:.:--·:~"-:--.~~~-~-'.-. 7-.....,.:-:-;:·::-, .. u
n .!_. Q ~ 6 e 21 · ! . · · . q v 1 c ~~~NT~ R 1-oq~ · ~ · s ~H '. ". · · · · · .. ·,-. , ·· " :· · ·, ''fa, 1 ~ ·:" \ '. .. : · : :: _' H1A ~ t: HARl>WA R~ .. . .. " · · ·· . : . · < · ·· ·, ... ~-· ... ·. ·:: : · · · ·, :::-~~-· :~
JJ•~...; Ob6828 CLAflK on: ttAR()WARE" ... · . "• Ult.48 .. · SMALL HA~Q"IA~~ ." ..... :. ... "
. 6"6t.2'J £OvA·R~fe-cntBURN i·21r;-oo CTn z ElP s·-A'D'V'l"S"ORY~C-OHMTnEElfE'm·N·G· .,
, 06b&3U COLE SCIE~TfflCt INC. $800.59 LAB SUPPLIES ~ )
)·-·---~:~:~~ · ·-· -·-··-· ..... ~g:~~~-~-p~~~~~~~~~nqc·At. --~1-sn~,--.--~-c------------~?-,~~!~:~----. --~----¢~~~~R ~-~~~~$urn 1 ~~-----... -··-··-·-·--·---··-···~------:--:,
o6~e3~ · c9:'4HNr.Nut, "'R n>o.H~"rn~• .. ~. · :,·-::>" · ... , _$2,0{$3,9~." : ·: .. AIR srMn~ 11oro~ · · .. ; . : ·. · .. :-.. · ; ... ·. · ~.
n 06683~ ' CONTINENTAL (:tlEMicAl CQ ·. · . in,39'l~l0 ·, · CHLORINE . . .... ·.·" .;'
,0t fJ 6 6 a 3 5-·-------·r-o tnRn L-s-p-c c f"A Lt STST1~ ce-------i 14·-;13" -REG u r·A To R-P AR rs .
•• 06&&36 COOPER ENEk6Y SERVICES 124t979.50 19 OUTFALL ENGINE EVALUATION/REPAIRS
, 06tB~7 CAL CONSOLJCATEO WATER $205.06 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE, WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
ll ---·-•. (J6 6 ~ .sa--:-------·-... STA u:-· pr-C'AL J FORNI~--~--.-~-! -..---;-:---·-:·--f J .lo-;1> o··-:;:-:-. -·.,--r-ANN Ex AT' 0H-·ur17 ··p JU~(:~ s·~' N q-nr·
06~839 . SHH ·~f' (;A~HORr\U ·: .. c u~o,ofJ ANNEXATIQH /Jl '~ P~()CU~IN~ fE~
o 6 6 8 ~ Q ST ATE 0 f CA LI f OR~ U ,. · . .. . ·-· s t3 O • 0 0 . . . -.. . ANNEX A Tl ON I fl PRO CE$$ I NG HE · · ·:
'6t-e·q1 SiArr-crc-u-1FCRlfiA -n:nr;·oo ANNEXAT"ION--15·1-PROCESSlN'G'-Hr------------
., 0668'12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA t130.00 ANNEXATIOH #118 PROCESSING FEE
[0 D6cB't:S OECKf.R INSTRUMf.fH SUPPl.Y co. U32.91t ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i
.:1· ··· --m::r-------·· ~~: :~m-~~~i~s-·~(AsS ·. ~Q .-:7~~n~·:7-:,s~mmrs:·~s·:-m~~RTC~~] prnnr~~~ :-· :E087%C0l:1'~'.;,~~'.i¥'.:'{ ~ .
00"6"8"'17 t:. D. A. w' 1 "-ce-rtr.P. L J NOS IR Oh $ J 6 '39 5. 66 E nr-ut-rnrATrs·on·o·roTS'P"O"SJ\1: . ; .
II
··--·· ·--77 --~-~---~~·~~~--~-..... _-:-.-. --~~-·-:;·-,~-~!·E~" ---;-~-·---:~:-70·~ --·-s;;G~~3~.:0:s:r:.;~;_.,!f ::t:1.~~~ ~ I~~
IU
f UNO NO 9J9q -Jl ~JST WCkKING Ctf JTAL PROCESSING O~T[ 12/09/83 PACE 2
....... -._ ......... --·----·-·· ·-···--·· ·---RrPORT.NUHB~R.~P't3·-··-·· ----· -----·-·-·-----·-:~~--.-.......... -·-:-···-·
. ;.· :~ ·.~ :~ .:
COUNTY SANlTATJON OJSTRICTS Of OR~NGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAlD 12/lq/R3 ·······--· -·-·-····--·---· ···-·· .. ----·----.. -· .. -·------·--.. ·---··--·-· ·-··--···----. .
UARRANT rw. VE' ND Oft AMOUNT DES CR IPT ION
' t t·-· ---06-~'tr -·--·--------... -£J" COHPAN y' INC ......... ---·---.---... -. ·-.... ---· .. --__ ,,_ -... ~2'i l 65d r. .... ... ... .. HE CTR' CAt.-· ~l)rP1:t·E~--··· ···-·----··-:---·--:------~· . i
06fi8'f9 EASH1AN, me. .• u,oQ.6'1 OfFIC~ SUPPLIES
06f.P50 fAIRVIE~ STATE ~OSPITAL $3 1 &73.62 USE CHARG~ OV~Rr.AYH~HT
•u --ot~n~u--~-----·-fM~IttM\--FlF'r-·a-~urrn----··--·-------·-·---·--· -·--· ·s.63~29------·· --PIPE ·suPPtaES-·---·--·---------·-----------·--··-
" 066£\52 FISOIER & f'OP.TER co. t.l,892.27 PIPE SUPPLIES
11 Cl6f~5:S FISUf.~ COl\lROLS $550.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
u -.·-·"··uH>ai>tt .... · ·-··---~··--.·· F J sH~fi ·-set~ NTlf -~ c-'"c-o·, ·--·-·-· ------:---. --..,.-··--··--·---·-··$n2·;0~-···--7"'--.,·--·····~-··~·Ap ·st,1rp~·t ~ s·-·-····.-.,-.~······..,···:·:~~~~-:::~;---;z-::-:<t~:~~-"'."~:r·:··· ·--
". Qf166!:?5 FLAT & V~ffTlCA~ CPNC~ETE .. $93,00 IJUH.Dl~fi HAHRIA~~ ·... . :.-·· · · ·-:. ;.-.'..':· _.:
I\ · o~6a~~ FRt:HONT tf\Of:HNITY co,~uRETY .nth2'th2S l\PEtHIOH Pw~998 . .. · .. · . \.: .. ':·)": . ·>
'' tHt~;-----·f"R-lCl<-·uAtl"""A"GttO-HFG. . ·-----i2r;395;·9"6 PLAN1--12··wARE'HOltS-~SH£"t'V"l"NG"
" 06t958 FRUIT GfiO~fRS LABORAlORY, INC. $26.00 LAB ANALYSIS
~ 06c859 CITY Of FULLERTON $96.22 WATER USEAGE
., ·---.-o(>t;i Of>·o--------~···-GAN-A Ht: -1.::ur,8£R ... C~r·--·-·-·-·--·-----··--·-.--~-··-·····---···-------s n; 0 lf··-·---:--·-·"°7~ ·--i.u11~~ R ........ ··-····-·-~·-.-:---, .. ---~~:-:---~~~~~7.'.7!~-.-.~~-, ..
1u . 0p6~"l GARf<ATT·Pq ... AtfAN COMPANY . .. _, u,027.5(? . : ··;. »LAQ S'-1PPLI~~ . :: ·:\.·: . '"·:·.··;'/·: :i'_ . .'\:,':.·.·;"t(~.·: ,'.::·) .. ::c/:
" 06~862 GENE~At. lE&..t:PHONE co.· ~21303,1? TEL~PIH>NE :··· ·"'.=. ;.!':~-/,.'·::.1.·::1 ,. -:.:·;: •• ·,,,,;·-.,<.' ;-;. ·
6cft"63 --rt&Kllt£srtr1'A"CH'TNr-. . s·3c;3;-CJr-RUC-1' .. REPAl'RS-
'U 06686~ HALST[O ~ HOGGANt INC. t325.65 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ,. 066A65 HAfiRINGTO~ INDUSTRIAL ~LASTICS $99.36 PIPE SUPPLIES
1!.I .. PS-fl~fl6" tfERT~-·c-Arl:fA~l NG'":' ·~-.. ·--:------,3z7-;·s-4 , --. -v~H rne-... ~AS I Hq--.. -.-~~-.-.. -. ···-;,~-... -... _., ~--.~. -~~-.:-:-····
.066847 tf~NEY\JfU., JNC, . i $118.51 . ELEf:T~ICA~ $Ufn1E~ · :·. '.· .. ·: ... · · · .. · .' : :··· .·
Pfi686ai f<,S, HUGtiES co,, JNC. ~510,':H . PAINT SlH1Rp~$· ·. ·: -~ ·,·: .. ·-~
ob8.61r----crrr-or1fOJTTNliTUN'"""'6£ A CH sru-;9·s---WAT E R-u SEAG E'
I~
ll
Ot6870 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHUINN CYCL $25.36 BICYCLE PARTS
066871 HURLEY EL£CTRONJCS, INC. t67.73 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
JI ·:: -o~~n~-----.~-~~-----liYPRQ·-·pR(JC:UCT~-· -----$l-;n-~ft3~--. -. -.. -... ~. --wATER-~f\f1rl~R--. --~--. -.; "1-;-. : -. -:~----:---:;--::-;-,~ .. -. --
'u~ Ot>4813 l$CO ~Pf!IPHn· . . ._:-.· ·. . .. $?~~.2~, ... " TUBING .. · · .. ' . .':.'·.: ..... ~.' >;,~; ._',-< : :· '. .... " . ~'L ~~681't. -< • lf"f'ERl~L HST CtiEHJCAl C.P! ;.,. •.... ' n,ttu,~$ ~ -: ... f~RIHC CHLORID~:.:.: . .-..:· . " .... ::·:·-.:.•' .<:,.·,;~·~:,:'< ·.
---UOfl\'7~---rNULRSOLL-RUO co.-nsu $'2'6"'4. DO ELFCTRl"C-HOTOR-RE"PKtR'
b Onf87b IRVINE RA~CH WATfR DISTRICT $3.50 WATER USEAGE
u 066&77 KAS 5Af£TY FROOUCTS $282.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES
J,·-··--··CJ6.(>~78" ... ___ ·-:-:---·-l<tlLY-PH'C"'CO•"-:----::---~-------, .. -. ..,..--.. -... --... -.. -. -.. --:--$~QT;9~"-'."''''.'""7•---p1p~·-surpa:-1n-~~·-:-·--~·~:~~~:-:-:::~·, ·, .,· ::: '
,. 06~879 ~-KlNG B~ARJNGt INC• · ... ·. · ,··· ". · ·;·$'}70,05·'·,., ... · ... ~~ARIM~ SUPPLl~S·'• ·: '.::;:-,::.,1 •·. ··i.-... ··~::
,, P66880, t<LEf.N•LJtiE CORP , . .. . . . .. <.:> .. :, U9!5G .:': :_,1.:···, .·:·· JA~ITQRfl\~ $UPPblE~ .. ~-.'~:,~'_.:• ;.:: .. :: •.. <.:··;.
,.. otltS-i-•~s-.-t!N • ~6 WEtO"tNusup·pt-IES
u 066882 LAURSEN COLOR LAB i't75.31 FILM PROCESSING
u 066883 LlfECOM-SAFfTY S[RVICE SUPPLY $25.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1u ~----p6·6eui~-··· ... T-::::-;"--·1:.1~ttn NG·-n~rrt-ret1nr~i-,"NF,-~~·;··~7-~·-· .. · " .. s59"3~51·;~..-:-~.~-:--,.,...·n~crR 1~M~--syrrr-uF; <:~ :_:.,'.: :-~n.· .. :. ·:i,~· .. ~fr7. .:··.L' .. : ::.: .·
066~86 . . JOHN·~ ISE~ PUHP~' H!P t: , .. '· :. . ·. ·· ;:)'.< ; . ._ . ·Ht 72lf 28 · :.,' · . · .. .--; ·. ·. PUMP P:ARH . ··-· · : ·:.:~.;/~::· :·:~'-'1\ . :-~~ •:s.f~y~ :.'.:'.: ,;°:'.. Y?;:'· '/.: o~6iu~6 · , l-OC AL· AGf::~cy f OR HA 1 ic>N: ~P"" ._: · :.<.~ >. -, · · ·:·,.·~:·:· ·' u5 o • oo · · , .. · · ANNEXATION I JI o PRQ~:~·$§1 tf~· )H·:~?\:r.::··.:·~i~<>::>:.~'~:.-~) ;<.
1iE1rB C-O-C"A·L1llirNcrrcraH1fTTIJlrC1}KH . $"2~0. 00 ~NNE1C-.lltitON-j1-o/PR'OCE"S-SttfClf'EE
:n
.. 06e8AA LOCAL AG[NCY FO~HATJON COHH $250.00 ANNEXATION #106 PROCESSING.FEE
. 'I.. L6f:.889 LOCAL ~Hl\CY fORHATION COMM. $250.00 ANNEXATION #lOS PROCESSING FEE
,, -~7 Dflrn eo-:---~--... --'.--,--coc ~F-f\GE t."f!Y-.. f OJOtA,TfPff"'C.QMtr,. )::·'-i~:~-7};,;;~f::..:: ... 1.'.), · 1}.J;·;;••{•;.,l~·~9-o·o .. :. :· .>ii.·::•~,:.:.~ ,AN~IT.ATlQ~-:·trJJlf:P RQn ~ ntt<t!Ffrh ...... :;'"!'T;.{~~-.•=~:.~:~~~·~~~i .... ;~;~7.'2:~:-\~·ffi:-r~~t~<r..'; ·::~\.,.. 0 . '.. 96.t.f)~ l . .. ' l-OC A~ Af?~ ~c y f QR~ AT' <rn.. c Qt1H '.:i·~~1.··:1.h!?Bi~§.~f· :.: \ /~.1':.1 1ry.'.~:~.;~,;!,~~/'Uij Q ~ 9 ()-:;;;i;~i~'.i-~:t:~~fi~· A~N~~AT 'o": '1 Q,1;:P.f\Q~~5.fi 'N~ ·~. H'-:!!.\rtt.;~~~~~1:~\:K~.~:~;'_!{:~~r.i~h.:~f(\ . . . ·. P= . · .. , .· •·· ~_g_g.:~~~~g~~:!!~; ~;;'.~.f:%::J~'.r' ::,:='~ :· .. ,:t}i)/~~·-:~~g!g3:k:it:r.-;..:·r·.:z.~1/.~~~rn?.~n4~1~;,~~ggt~~1~~~:;:($::f:£;~~:;_~'.Yi·~~~~~w:\:·£t~'s~~\:.:; .
. ;
I \ --.·" --. :~--~~-~ ·~ ·---~·· . ,, ·,./<::·;::.er '~.~·:'.W 1 m~I:1~~/9~~t·i·:;~~j;1~~:?.'.f ;;~:1Ul~Y:f ~1:¥·-V~t.:~~iV1tk;~tJ~i·ti:;:;: {~;:f:'.W~1f ~'H?:i,;'~~~:,::,:
( ( (-,
• .. "''
. ---~~-~~-{ .-~·.: __ ,_:_ __ ~~--~.!.:~-'-:--~-CH~~~~---~~~Jl.~~~---.~-~~----:--4 -·-.---.,...-·-·----~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~-p!·~-~?~.a~ ... ~AGE .. ~~~r~~( . ~~.r::~1'~!.
. . ~ou~p ~ANJlATIPN DIS1R1H$ Of. (lf\~NG~ r::ourny . ·.,_,_ . '. ·:·;:-::' ......... :·.:.·.:,~ .. :;;,::<r:~·;.: J 1--;,.__________ . . CLAlft~ PAlP lU11t/8~ . ' . : . ,·., ... .;· ';', < ! >:''.-!:-\.;'~:.:.'-L ..
01: • ,1 ... \.IARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESC~IPTION
u
' tf9P.*1~' 1:oc-~-~N"q-·rof\M"ATI1JN-COMtr,. . . --~~~~r;-gp~~:--... -.. -. MiNUATlPN:l~o-pl\o~n$-lH.G :-rn-:.--, :..;;.:::.:~;;.·;.:·~.1; ••':.f:',-{.:":u 1 :~"''..-:",
P~689~ . LQC Ab .. A~E~cy f0R'1A H QN C OttH •, .... )~ _· · , $2!;ifh O.O · '.: ' .-. ·' .. t\NHUAT I ON 1~6. Pf\OHU t N«L H~;) .. }~:]i;·J.~Y:·;.;\:f;}r·" ::::.~:;_·~,~'.<."
06(.ee.6 ~OCAL AGt:NCY FORM.AHQN COHH, ':-.,: ;.·,·. . . . f2~o~oo : ·ANNE~ATIQH l~h. Pf\OCE$~1N~· fU j,:;.;_:-~:-.··.~-... ,f'.~~:~~,/;~~··,··:··>~...-:: I 066097 LOCAr-trGLf\-n-f"o1n•A1 ION COMl'!. S25u.rro . ANNE'X'AT1·0N-1i.2-PROCE·s·s-1NG-'-FE·E-· ' . • . . . ' .. n
:: OH890 LOCAL AGO.CY FORl-'.ATIO~ CGtU~. S250.00 ANNEXATION #'i1 PROCESSING FEE 11
0660':19 LOlolRY & ASSCClAHS $35t550.tl0 ENGR. 2-25, 2-23, 2-21,, 2-22, 2-10-1A ::
:1·•· .•.••. ~·m;~17·:-::.-~~;mJt1mm:~·.:t.~\;;y:./~21v:::_:n~::::n:ff .. >t:·.>c:,;~~!m~IPHH~~~~Ti~:~~~ltf<tF:·:-~-.·:~·0~~:1;::~
--tiG"Ei9~ Hf1Nt-~1\"STCRl-rn • ST&r."so · HETERs------·---=----· · · · ,
tt 066904 GEORGE ~ILLER CONSTRUCTION $359,4~4.20 CONTRACTOR 1-2R-J, RETENTION 3-3R-1 u
~ 066905 MILO EQUIPHCNT CORP. $95.64 TRUCK PARTS ~
"·------Q~~·~Hifi··-r··-·"':'--:---~., .. ---M n~11Ei:c-MNVAL.:~Y"'l Ne, . · ~: ,, .. ' ,,. ... ·. _.,.;. :· ... _, -::.""'::~-·--~1.-r;-"o-=-..-:--.. -.. -i -~~· .. pvn-rcA r·J <Hf.,..----·,..··-:-:---=---.. ·---.. ---:-:--:-....,·:·"""~~~~: .... ,, ~. ! 7 ·: I'>
111 Of,p9Q7 . MQNT«?PM.ER.Y EHVATOR C.PM,FArff:·::<./: .> ·<·~,\'t..:'< .. ·:-__ .. '~?ft·~~ .. ·. . :·. ELEVl\To.fl "MHTEttAff«;~,'_ P~A~T Q'l.:~·· ... ~. ~:, \/.,, ··._;l!',,1•1
~· 06f?~~($ t'.UL Tl urn~ I <;S . -~ .... • '? ;;/;_. (::, . ': .. · : '. .:.·:· '"· ,aatt f 90 . . : .· -~· . . El.~HR I CA.L. Ur.AIR&:.~ '.. '.. . :1::: ,'' . ': ·' -. ::: -~.:I . ; :, :· ; ll
ll 0 N"Altornn:-a:rCiRTC COIL $10,399.36 COIL ASSEMBLIES . -.
~ 066910 NATIONAL SONICS S277.87 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
( 14 066 1Hl NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFOHHATION $33.50 LAB MANUAL .
\.
,,--'"'"Qt)691"2'~-. --:-ccnl:'t'Nlfq:-·f;·pq:EGr;.;-~ql'ff'f:R:: ·: ;'. .. :~:··.'.>·.':;fr;.:•;·, ~-~,~Qot[Jr;·-r-:~C"'~QcE1ttf"':tt9NlT9BtN.»~:::-::.-~-.-. ;•.-.1 .~ .•·
06fi91:$ OCf:AN SAl-T CC>. JN<; . --... _, ... · .• _.•:,:._: ··$608·?~: ...•... SALT'.·' .. ·. ·'.'.•·:~·:: . .-.··, .... , . ···,.:;,.,
:: 066~l't · ·. cnv of OR4~rnc' ' ... :"··· · · ". · : .. :· ·:: '\::·. sa?.7~1;23 · · .. QRANGE TRUNK ~-~w~~--··R.·~,·HP.U.RS.·E·"t.tif' "<::'· .. ·:
--rIG"Ei!tt!:.1 OlttNGLYATVr& f 111 ING C • 2"P]';'94 VA'L-VES -.
n 066916 OXYGEN SERVICE i95.29 SPECIALTY GASES
• 06lS17 co. Of ORANGE-AUOITOR CONTROLR $65,aoo.oo COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES
11 'CJ-o~f;~ l{S-"7:·-. · ,-~-~Qvl'fTY.,..q~llTATJ~~rrrffU 1, ; .. :\'.' ···~ ... ·1 .:·, :.·; ..... ~, •• _,•.,;\:\:-;~n-CJ.2·q-;P,3 .. ,_,.. · ·; .·. -: :-::'':«:; R~ n~tn~ti-WO.t\K~ Mt-:~~q11r.:r-r~~P ,: ... : '; :, ... ,: : ., ~. · ......
0-6-CCJ21 -P-AllE"t:•trlll-CllP • $1'395;-ai u·sctHARG'E-OVERPAYH"fN
n ub6922 PA~AHOUNT EOUJPHfNT RENTAL ANO $132.50 TRUCK PARTS •I (16£923 PARTS Uf\Lll'.ITEO . f.262.H TRUCK PARTS u
:-;;"":-~~6~i 1r--.,.----:··-; --~ -~---·ftttJLl.:rrs-pQ~-tNCT"'">-" \' ... "; .-. ''. "" . --. nq·19~fr"Q'lf~;--..--.. -. 1·0-"'DfWATERttrn"-FAN3~~-~--. ,-.-. __ ,._...--~---.·-. -. _--;-•--. , ....... -.. : . ·. : . · .. ·; ~ ~ m . . > ...• ' ~ i ~;~mi~ A~~R r "~9\!H~\?;i~ i), % '.' ':'ii'.'~:'. ·:j·[t :: ' .. ~i ! ~ ~:: :: . / •. ;. } . m {m' /\~ ~u mt~~ .·:':·'f:'{::.· i :> :. :\L~·, ''.,:;t' ~g':\'.~,:': ';%~;.:'· ~
"6"6'927 QU"ArTTYtll1Tt'DTNbSUPP . n-r.re Bllito·1·NuHAT£R'l-At-S . . -' . . u
tt 066~28 RAJN60U DISPOSAL co. ,33~.oo TRASH DISPOSAL ~
"Q6f.529 RICHARC RANDALL f.23.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ~'
1:: -~~-~::H~ . ---~-~-~~f .-~~n~~~V~f\~ ~~ .. · ··· .. ·._.·: .. ··. . .. ·· .·; · :_ ,_·: ·:<::·~--~-. · .·:, :;r:1~r :~~y~~-~-~~,.~~-~-~:~R~~~-~~~Y,".i tt.rf f~;::xr'·!-~:;1-.·:···:/.r· :~\!.~::~:\,~;~:_·.,:.-~~··,.{/)-:
1
:: .... ~-:-::;~ 1
•• ~~""~~~~e~~-~~~.P~~~Q,. Qf.. . . ., ..... , n~-~~-:~~~ ,,... . ·: ~~~-~c-~~-~~~l~~~RP.AYH·~~N·:j:·::"-~··· ?::;:.,·: ... r:.~?-:'-'>: ·:'.-··<<·; .. ·. i~·.,:,. · .. ;:,:.~ .. '°
C66~3~ ROBBINS & MEYERS $7,~~2.41 PUMP PARTS .
"I u66935 THfOOORE ROBINS fORO . $22.66 TRUCK PARTS
lur-.. --06~-CJ~fl·-:-·-·-:-_··-~--:-·-Rus~~g-qn,srnucnPffj~N~~, · --,.-,~-:--:~·;,. ::·. . ..... H39;ta·;.~o-~ ·. · . CONTR./\HO~-s-;;-18~---.-. ,-.. ~ .... : ·::,··".;:/·.~···/-·;·:.'. ...... ; :.:.~~-.... ,, «::~~7 .'·t·::.·'.'.':' . "
< o~ 6SH ... ·.· . , ~YAN '"ti{~CQ . · . · ... · · ·· .... ': ·~> .. · , · .. / ::·: '.:.:, '. ~.;; ·::'·\: . . ,.--:-'«l~6.10 ·,. .· PIP~ $UPP.LI~' :._-:· \3/,:;t._:-" :>·!~= . .-:·.."-::.,\· ~i~_!:~~M~;\> ... ;\;'.:~f-'.\~~~\:;~~</.:.J),~,~r.1:~
I' .. 'I . : 06 6 9 38 JQSEff1 T' RY~ R ~ON ~ ~Qf•h 'l ~~ ~ .. ·:., ". ... ~: ;. ' ;.·: . . • . . -· H6 (J' 8't ... ,·. ' . s T HL ~TQC ~ ... . . :~ '., ., .. , ,~ii,;.:1:1'"'1;:-~\".' ·::::,:•,:·"·<\:.-~ ,'• .. ;' .. _::'.:::·,··..:. ·J 1.1 :•,~·/. ~·I :.,r--·-o·a6"939 .... P.s. iEt"H'NOt""OGT ;:) ntr61J.lj I U'S'E-clfA~G·rovrRPm'HcN . ' . .. . . . . • ....
..
Ill
1'
'I ··-·-··-·-· -.. ----·-...... -·-· ..... ---------· ·_ .... --·---,-~--~----:.··~~ :~~-·.-. --. -·:-;--~-:--:-,~.-:0'.,_,j:.(.12f!.;)K,{'.~,i,:_;:/0··D;:;1$.;;~11'.:M~~. ~
.__ ______________ _
tUNll NO 91~5 -JT OIST wc~~ING CAPIT~L PROCESSING DATE 12109/8? PAGr 4
····-····· --· . ... -· -· .. .. .. ···-··· -· .. ... .. . .. . Rf PORT NUMBER ··Ap/tl···-··· ---------~··--····----·~-:---··:~~---··
COUNTY SANITATION OIST~ICTS Of OPANGC COUNTY ~.' ·'..J:·;
J-----·--·-·. --·-----·--------······ --·· ······------·--···-··---·-···-~-~-~ ·~~--t>._A _!~-J~-{~.!~~~---·-------·-·· ·-·-···--.. -----·-------···------·· . .. . .·:" '··_·,;:_..;~, .-. ~;-
LIARRANT NO. Vf NOOR AMOUNT DfSCR IPTJON
4i • • -.•• . ···--··· ----------------,1--·--op-61:p40·-----------.. --SANO""O O'LLAR BUS rnrss-F ORMS" --···--····----.. -·-····---···-···. --·$16'~ 96 .. _ ·~·-· .......... Off I c E fORH$ ·. .· ·. . ' . :· '."
•I 06(J9'fl SANTA f4NA GOOG[ ~'t2't .16 TRUCK PAl\n · . . . . · .
, OHS't2· SANP f4NA ELECTRIC ttOTORS Utu53,20 ELEC!f~.1~ J'10TO~ .. r.~~U.L ... ·--·· · __ :·_· __ ... _. __ .·,_. _. _._,,_-"-·-·-
"'Fli6.EICJ't°3·-------·----si;cpus-coH"P~------------·-----------~-------------·nErn;1c·----····-·---.. HHff COMPUTER 01sc MAINTENANCE
:: ··-.. ~-""~-H:;: ....... ---. m_ ~mn_ ~~~~ ~(. Rv-·ccr,--. -. ---------------· --· Wt ii-.... --··--m~L:~;_ :5 ~5----~~······-·~~~-:-~.---~~_.'.:·7
.. -~.:_:--.::::_R~_r_:r;~~:, _ _:_;::,_~.'_:~_-... ·=~·
1• .• 0669'f1 AtH~ SHJPJ<EYt lN~t . $666,~2. TRU(:K Tift~~. ·~ · ·.:·;\I',.· .-. "' H,;,.: ;;~,_l!'.c'··"L
" . O~f>91t~ SNAP~ON TQOl-S C9RP. . $305.6~ TOOl.S < ·' .: . ·~·.:~'.;. · ~;'.;.;., ·. :: .. '..,;'~,
nocCJ·4cr-------sournrRN-nI.1F~DTS1nrc-o. n""2-a-,1urn·-;r p·own-------
" 06£)950 SO. CAL. GAS CO. S71666.'t5 NATURAL GAS
" 06f.%1 SHl~ER CCRP. $2 1 1t05.93 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT
.. --96r;"95"2 -.--------THE--$UP'PLIERS-·---. ---,-------. -. :---....... -..... --.-----. -·$2·n-; 'f·9----!.....--5-ffAl"C-HARPW~R~ .i. ,~:-:-~·P -,._:, :'i ': :. _:: ;: :; · :' .;,"'"7T:.:: ... : .,;c::-·
14 O(>f,953 SWEElLANQ co. . . --:~ ... , .. ,67,~a '•' · .. l PIPf ~UPP~tu.~· .. :.-. .... ,·.:·\_·::.'~~··:,-:/·:-.. ;"·::·~:-;-~ . .,:,_.,,;-..,~: .. ,-",•;:
11 • Qp695~ , .' J • WAY NE SYLVEHER, -:· . · ·•·s· · {·.: :. •· ._. U t 310, 11 · . PETTY ~ASli R~ "UHJl\Hf1f IH,'.':'.'~'::.,;:'. :·;' : · ::',,:._, ;., ~,'. ·i.'.' '" '..: '.'.• "·
·i>e-c15 ti I R lTC1(--g-/fGTCrSUP1"[1' , I NC • t ft7"3'978 TR UUCP.AR.TS
066956 J.G. TUCKER & SON, INC. $607.9q OXYGEN SUPPLIES
u a66957 u.s.o. CORP. $158.89 LAB SUPPLIES
~---o6-f>~5s-----~-uNroN-·01L·-·-c-o·-.-or-cn,-r~---.-.· ----·s·pr921 tl'As·onwr--··-, .. :·.., . :~~,.,
in Ci66959 Ul"UTEP PARCq. SERVJCE , J't~,97 PHIV~RY Hf\YICE,,~<'.<--.': ·· · .''.'. '. :'" ..... .
11 066960 UfiPED SUTES ~LEVAT()R ~ORP, "" H?l.QQ · :· ., . ANNUJ\l., H~YAJ.9R M!aHqnff, .. Gf;··t\Pl1fHi QfflC~~·.:"~ >1 '
ll E9li'l -vgw--scTnsnFTC____ . !TtFiS-;"5 7 L:All-SlrP'PITES .
~ b66962 VALL(Y CITIES SUPfLY CO. $11128.54 PIPE SUPPLIES
• 066963 VALVE & STEEL SUPPLY CO. $131.'t~ SOLONOID
JI ·-·····pf>~ 96 ,,. --. ·----· ----· v AR f: Ci--., Ne·;··-·--.. -·--···-·---.. -n,-nlt,-~ 4-.. ---.---:--VA~ v f: ~ --·-'.\--:----. '-~-.. ~-~-.. ~~~----~ .... ::·.-.::.' :.· ;'
I) ::; O~tii:Jflf) JOl1N R, tilt\PL(S ... ".-:-'_·-:-~· $:,na,a~· ,. . . QPOI\ ~Q"$ULTA"T . . . . . i '::'.... : ...... < ... ·.,,·:;~\ .. >
u td 0~6966 CARL W4RRCN ~ CO, . ; .• : , ' H't't,2J -. : •· '. H~~_!_hLT_y__p .. Alt1$, AP"IHUTl\ATOR':;-;_, -<t·-;,, .. '.·· .. ·. :··-~:>.'-.'· 6b9 6 / u r-sTnrrr1mornrA"n ~ u. --i"3o"74 r R1J t K PA RT s
)L
~ ~ 06f9E8 ~IOJNG TRANSPORTATION $104.50 FREIGHT ~ 06f969 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF $~78.39 CASA CONFERENCE EXPENSES
-~ 0~~~70 ·····-··~----... ·--·xrR o~ ···cl)Rp·~----·-·-·--·----· . ·--~-.·-~---·no-; ~-~~~X~ffOX' "R'EP'RODQnTq·w-· ,-,"'7"~-' '· . .· . :_:. ;'; '"'.'Y:\ .. ,.: >· ·. ·J
Of,6971 XERXES flf~RGt.ASS J~~'.. . . . Ht029,92 STOMG~ TANK~, P.~H/~H.~tt l,.Ali.H TN~.·:.~.,-._~··~:·~(·~ .. ~<::._·:
q6f.972 Y ~ H~~ . ·•.. ·~ : .. ·· ".; .J63Qt9f? TRUCI< Tit\~$. •'' '., '. ·" · .· ''.·'·:· · ·;?·';, · · :"'.'.;._:;>;~(:,:·; ;c·.
JI
JI
ti
.,I
1::
u
lu ~.
TOT4L CLAIMS PAID 12/lq/83 $1,2371323.63
·---~·---.. -.. --". -· . ---~-, ... ' :_~?"' .. ·.· : : '" .. , i'; ·f~~~;~:1t~wf" •?;;~·~ .,, ; ~0~~ ~--:-; :.f,·(iC:'.C;}FT~:f~'.!f 'h:'t.' :m5.:~~~11~.~j3i'Jl:'.\f
1"
'u ,,
I
,o tr· ... , --~:2;~=~~2~a~~A~~~~~~~~~
\.
\..
I ----
7
·••· .. ~~;-_:~~~;.:: .:~~>; ;;i· ··::.< ;/ ;;:r:~tJti· ... ';::.~~:-~;~;;.,'.; ,,'.{f.t~:~~11!tf ~;?;~J:i :!1~;tif ~t~~~::J.~.f if Jf ~ij£1/;;~:~f~;~s1vt1;~~~i::~:
( ( (,
... 111.l
(
\.
.-. -.. ~-
··--.. -~-~~(_ JT ~I ~T \jORK I NG CAP!_TA~---___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _( ___ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ ___ =:~~~~~~:~p::~~p 4 ;y()~/8!_1 :__l:-'T".":':":
~OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY . .'··:·;~:;.s~:·1~
CLAll1S rl'IP U/1~/83 . , · ... · ~:
-------·--·----· ............... ·-·-··-·--· ....... ·---··· • ·-···-··--··--·--------------·-... -·-·· -----·---···-.. ··-·-. ------·---·--·--···----·------·· ------·-------.-~-·-·-.. ·------·-· -.. ·-·-.. --····----· ---·-, • 1, t.
~
SUHHARY AMOUNT --·· .. ·---------·-·· -... -.... ---· .... -.... ·-----·----.. ··-------·~-------·-·--------. --~-
12 DP~R FUffD $ ~.090.37 . . . . . .· ·. ·'-' . •· .. :.er
•• 1 ·H---~~~-rn~g------·--···--·-----_________ __: _______ . ·····--··· -· ·· ··-· -~ }:-~~-~:~·~-----···------·-.. ·---·---·-~------.. -· -· ~~-· .... --~~-·-·· ..:...~ >. -· '. · :· ........ /.·>.::::::~. · :~
#3 OPER FUHD 4,095.92 II
II
II #3 ACO FUND 103.02
u ··-·--·····--·---n ·oH"-FUNQ ______ . _____ .. __ ----·····-.. ------·-. ...,...._. __ .. _____ ---··-·-·-·----··-· ·----·----.-; ooo: $6 --------------·---~-----..-~---···-.--~-----:-......-\. -:-·'"'"'7~~:--~~7.:"?T·-:-~:;:1· ::I
.. #5 ACO fUNP . . . ·.. 7),229!30 . . . . .' ... ·. ··~·· "·"·_: · .. '::;''"· ,.', :.~:·:·i; ·~ ·~ 111 orER FUND · s.~~8.86· . · .: ,. .. · . ...: :. ····._. :'; .. ~· · · ., .. ,;:.. ·.:.\~ .• :.;·= ,, n-·Ac'l>-f'UND .. ---g-:-ec; . " . . . ". , . .. . . ... ·-.. ·:1
111 F I R FUND 8 2 • 7 6 7 • 2 3 111 ''I
u
611 OPE R FUND 5. 2 77. 1 3 !I! ::i----·---n·i 7-PHR. Fuijo----·-··----··--·:·--._.-~.-------. -.. -. ----~ --------·------·l';o6r;u----------·--~~~----. ----·--:o-~~--~~·~-.~~~·~:--.~: .. '. ~<.~~7 c:-~·~':/,:~ ''
JT PHR fUNO . , -.. · . . . . 422, 561. ~7 . . . . ... . -. .. . . " .... ·. . , .:. . , . { .. · , .. :_,
I l >" • ' J o' . • • ~ . ~· ' • ' , -~ , '. ,' ~. . ' ' ' t ' ' ,' • I. . ._ . ,, > , , ; •,' '• ·.: '" • · • l"' • . l J ,;:-.---.:.. ~~~h·mio£0TTi\e1u.rv ·,NsuRANcE. Fuib ~.Qi1{·1·t:-l0 · · ... :· · ·:· , .. ·.··:'.'.·.:·,. · ·"",,···"'·"" l-;./.''·.·.:.:-".:·> ·:-:·.;~;:~:,(·\;~~~
II
u S Elf FUN DE 0 WORKERS' COMP. IN SURAN CE fUND 2 • 920. 63
i•t-------~!-~~!HH~rn .. ~~t!.!~!:. FUN.!! __ _,.----~----.,,---_ . -=-·-. -~i!,~,i~:_!_3 __ . __ _ A . . -
l•'
"
a
1J
.
TOTA~ CLAl"S PAIP. 13/14/Q~ U .•. a_H ;l.~_3,..f~3 ·
)I
_ ... ~--,-.-. -.,-.~~~--~~
~. \ ,· . }~ ... .. ,.·l~~. -. ~~
~~·_{ ·~ » .
. : ,, . •:'
....
.-\
.·.• lal : ~ ---------------~-----·--~~-~_,-----~:~---------·-----------·-.. --:.-.7~--:_?E'".,..~~~:YS,_· ~· ... :-;i-T
ll
I
)\
.16
" u
n
"
II
11
. -_,, ___ .... ~i--·---·------.-.---. ---
!----------"-~-----
.,, .. _ ... ······~~ -•7'-------·---·:---·----~---" . I"
·.· .
. ·: ~'. ;, ~ .... ~, '~ ..
'; .... ~j.;::·:·<: .:
.. ,
\
1'• ,.,
---':.::,1:iifo_:i,-·:·<i1}':i~:1f Af ·,, · ·: ::;'i~:.:}>i:· ·:; Mrd::~~:Y~: ··1(~~ E · .. 1,:
~4· ·.: '~:·;_. : ~-
~·
~
!.'.'
'»
~--7'9·~--. ~~~-----~:·T~~ ~' . ~ -,;;'/ : . :\;{ '>~~~Jt:: .::: ;::'t~-:;-".:'·;!;i.y dj .}ti.%1~,\~:3 ·f . .. . . ~ .
" . . I~:~· ...... • .-"' 'r
iL1 e ---------· -·-------"7-:---:T:'_ -·;;. '\ ;y · <r ) '. ,_ ~7~ : } ~--·:~;: ::/ t;. : i, -~:.?:.~\) y \\ :~~{li .. :i:::·t;s:~:~{;J:~n~;:·r~~,};:;;(~~f ;~f f:,,-:1 l't
n
~
u
~--------------------.-.-:~-~~~:{ ~!~jt~!~~~: ~:~~~ f:~~i
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WCRKING CAPIJAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/83 PAGE
I
• I
1-[JI, "ARRANT NO. VENO OR AHOUNT DESCRIPTION
H9.90 < '.,; · ·,_' AU CALIFORNIA .. · .· . . :: . ;; ,. " '. ·,, . ",. . · .· . $i5&• oo ·. · :· . <. . Arn ·FARE, VAR t OUS. HUl'' NGS:.: · .:< ~ .. , ::::, .. :-.. '; .: f:.'. : :: _ ,\ i-----wr;t;991··-'-----· A: trr-p1moUt"lS .. 1-tHEKRArs-;-nn;-. __ . __________ , __ _._Sl3s:6a-··-·--··s PECTAl'TV "'CASE s. ··--·-~--.. ·--=--· _________ ..._ _______ _
066992 ALTA SALESt INC. S219.93 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
066993 ~MADCR OEVELOPHENT co. Slt800.00 LIDO PUMP STATION REPAIRS
i-----oe'3"1;~· . ':·. A'RClrf'O[YRElnC"Sf\lNC. . . : .·." . sH·o.50·. . PURPl'Al\TS.. . _ ___,...-.. ,.... -_-....,.-...,..--~ .. ..,.... -:" .. ~.-. ~-:.~,----,.:-.-:-) ""'. ~:.~.'~·-1
.. 06(1995. . . AM(RlcAN CYANAIHD.COHPANY .... " : ·" .· '· ~ $2,1412•50 . CftEHICAL COAGULENTS ........... ": ... ' ·v:··. ",. ·,':: :'
", 066996 AMERICAN sciENTiFIC PRODUCTS · ... :·). ·$938.30 , " .;LAB SUPPLIES . .• ; · · · .. ·, · • ~ " ·--·oli6·11c,,------·--omn~A~-s-n·Rr · n93~nr;·6-r------c~e-·surPnEs--·--··----------------------1
( In 066998 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $699.60 PIPE SUPPLIES 1
u 066999 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES s100.oo TOWEL RENTAL
•• . . . n1nr .. · . . Anp-ir-·Bnrt1JRP. . . , .. . ·s26-;us;21 . . c1rnrrDl:-~llm;urrNTS ·· · ·· · . : . · > ..
111 • . 067001 ARROW•RISCO, INC. . . . . . !48.97 VALVES · · ·.. . . · .. ·.. . · . ..'. .
. 11 • 067002 · . . ASSOCIATED.LABORATORIES ·' . · " $275.00 LAB ANALYSIS . · > .... · ... · · · · . · -~'. .. ·:« 1:,
11 -----u6·1003---·--·-M1AROS'&TRtPRirs-·---.. --------------·---··--$l Ott.20---·---·sERVlCE'-'MIAROS' .. ------------·-·---·-''··-·-'·--····-·-·--·-·-·-··-··,.
n 06700q BACON DOOR CO., INC. $96.65 ENTRY DOORS '
11 ~ 067005 MARGARET BAILEY $20.00 CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE HEETING
l1I • ~lJE"701J6 .' '"'"lJ[C:KMAfC-l'NSTffUffrNTS --shn·~-;!rn---·-~lE"C'TRTC'l\I~UP"PI'fE~--· ----.~-. --
1' tL. 967007 \ . ' 'PAUL BERGERON ' . . s30.oo . EHPLOYEE "'~~AGE . . I • • . • • . 1:
11 ::; 067008 BEVCO · . . $227.62 ELECTR~C CART PARTS·. · . · ·. · , : ~
z• --Ol>7ulJ9--------arrnLv · a--·~ssoc1nrs9·-rm:·;----·----------···s:sso.1rn-----yo-uEirs-r-cnHP:-·~oRTNrsnuons------------~
~67010 0LUE DIA~C~D MATERIALS Sl33.56 BUILDING MATERIALS ~
067011 W.c. BROOKE S103.40 · EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
lli----. l>1012------.-.. -. BUTrDJNG-·NrUStlN"C". . ----------·-··uu;.30 ·--~--punrrtATllJW--_______ ---. -. -.
ll 067013 . . .:eu~KE E~GJNEERING ~o. SH.23 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . . . ;
n 067014 . CPT CALIFCRNIAt INC. . $518.71 · WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE· ': . ,. ------·o"E-1o1 s---··--------c~ .. cc Mr> ANv··----··--·---·-----·-..... ---------·~---... -----·-------____ .. · $32 3 ~-ia--·-.. -· ···---·-·-vArV£ .. s ·----·-· .. -·· -·--·-----------.. -·-------·-.. ·--------" 14~
» 067016 CAL-WEST INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS Sl,356.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ti
~ 067017 CALIAGUAt INC. $7 1 770.60 CONTRACTOR PW-085-1
JI • 0670re--·~.,_..i:UlfOR'ffJ"A'INSTTTUTE-or-TE'CRRl>IlJGY---:--. ----sr36f;n--""'-.--u-uir·oc£AN-·s-rnoGE"'-DTS'PDSXL--SToDY . ' :
u· , .... !)670i9 .. : I "'.'JOHN CAROLLO EN(.;INEERS . . . ss1:992.47 ENGR. P2-25-2, p'1-20;.J-15,· ~NER~Y TJ\~k FoRCE'.:"; .. ::
l'I 0 6 7 0 2 0 . J 0 ti N t AR 0 l LO ENG I NEER S : s 3 , 5 3 2 • '17 ENG R • UL Tl HA TE S 0 LI 0 S D I SP 0 SA l • ~ 2 -2 7 ·: ." ,,
40--oE1021····-·-··----·cHFMUE s T ·1 NOUS TR J ESI TNt; ·· ·-· ···-···. ----·· ·--··--·· --····------h '968; ifr·-··--·-----FE RR I c "CHLORIDE. STORAGE TANR" LE'AS E ........ ---··-···-.. ··----·--.. --,,
I., 067&22 CHEVRON u.s.A., INC. u,S61t.1e GASOLINE ~
!o 067023 MANUEL CIC $20.00 CITIZEN'S ADVlSORY COHHITTEE MEETING \I
1 ~O~T02 1f..-..----~.-. --,R~a-;-·c·[APF'"Clrrr·1Ntr·--.---·--. ----·-.. ---·---~-.--·-·--ufi5-;'8ij-.-·-----~UECTRrtA[-S'UPPLTES _____ -·..,--.-. ·---.. -.-:-. --'" ~·
:u ... "'. ~6?025 · · DAV~~· J. CLINE . . · · s20.oo · · CITIZEN'S ADVISORY coHklTTEE HEE.TiNG :
· 067026 COAST PtPELJNE CO. Slt186.32 CSDOC #7 REPAIRS · · ' ·., · · "
' ---06 7027' ·-·--·· -----·coNSOUDA rro ELEC TR JC;\[ -onr;·. ·-· ... ···-... ·-·--··--·-·-•·$2; if i.\'"~u;· ·--------. -·· 'f:[EtfiU cAl"" SUPPLHs-·------···------'-·--
~ C67C20 CONSOLICATED REPRODUCTIONS S3 9 169.60 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
1::-. -.. · ··7=" ~-~~~ ~ :---~--···· ----~ ~ ~; ~~~ ~ ~: ~lj~H ~ ~ :~; ·t E; ~·--·-···----·-·· .. ·· ---· -····------· --···1 H: .;; ; i ;.~;--~--··-·--· .... ~ ~~i~l~-~. e·N 6 1 N r··19 rt n·An s-. --· · ---... -
0 ·_." 067Q~l COURTON & ASSOCIATES . . S.21480.00 CSDOC i/1,6,7 MASTER P~AN UPDATE.-.. '
••1 . 1, 067032 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $21.70 · WATER SOFTENER RENTAL . _.;,1.·:-,,.;~.:
t---o·67(i"3"j·-·---·-····-----ULIF";·-sutt 'UNIVrttSIT'f--Ot'TilNG-BEACH .... ___ --... ·-··· 'i289:oif ·--"·---·-· ·sEHINAI\" REGI STRA'i'iotr-·------···~--·-·------' -c--__ --~-r-' --· -----------··---· --: .. -· . ... ------c --·· -·· ------· --.. . ~-------7---~--( -· · -:Ii
. -
( ( (
,.
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/83 P~GE 2 _ ,. , -... · ....... , ··-·• · :-., .. , ....... ·: , -;--... -... ~."'77·~ .... ; ·. . · .... · , .. · REPORT' NUHaElr"JH3~·~· · · .. ~, ... ~,
:r;},\\:.·' . . ... .'-; _ ... c.:o~NTY SANJTAT'lON '01~TR~CTS OF .<>~A~GE co~~tv ·''·. . . " :"' ;, . ,. .' ..... ,I'.· . · .. ,_.. · , : .·CLAIMS PAID 12/28/83 "<" . . · .. . :.
•. \~·---.. .-.~---. ; . ···-·-------------··--.----·------·-·------·-·--------··-·---------·--·---.. -· ···-· .. ·-···-·-----------------
\IARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCR IPTION
bTU1~-. --. -i;1-;A. O~Hl ·" '. .;. ........ $20• 00 .''.·, .. -,:-·cTiTZTif'T-'ADVfSlfRTc~HQfnTn:ffE.nTff
067035 · DAILY PtLOT -· , .. · · $16•25··: · .. LEGAL ADVERTISING ; .· ·,· .. ·.· .. ,.' ·.
067036 . DECO . · · . . . · '· ·. S2 1 803.34 · ':. ELECTRiCAL. SUPPLIES . ·": .. -~ .
II --·-oi 103 ,-.. ------··· --·r:;t[p'iil-SYSTfitS ;· 1 Ne··;·--------------·-·-----·--· i292;·50-.. ·--·--·---HiN1 ·--coRPUn R s·Upp()Rf"'"SEiHrl CES---------·-----·--·
111 06 7 038 DEM-PAR SALES & SERVI CE UH .18 SHALL HARDWARE ·~
» 067039 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $21319.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES u
u ---on111nr--------onHoYNr-"fOliPUt£fi sERV1ccs --.--·ir;·o26;oe---~. -tirnrcolfiiUfER-RAllffEtJXtffE · .-. · ; ,'", ·,: .... "
1•·
u ., 067041. EA~TMANt HJ~.. "' . . . . .·· S'ltl.09. -OFFICE SUPPLIES .. : ·,·, ·,: .· : .. : .. ·.-.-~ .. ;.'. :-,:, .. ,.
1:: -· ~.g~:~----·-------~~~·~··~~~H-1£~~HY£if _________ .:_ ____ · --· ·-· -~-----····-_:._s 3 i-~~t:~ -~-~-4-~~~~R1i~ :{~-~t~-~·---~--'.~-~_{_i~-~--· ---· ·~--~l.~.·; ;,· ...
» 06704q FILTER SUPPLY CO. $653.04 FILTERS
u 0670~5 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE S61e00 RECORDING FEES ., --n 1vu · FTSlltR~ EN'flFTC co• ·. . .. · " · ho 2. o s .~ .. · · IABSU 1rirrn.....-__,.....__,_.,..._~ ,,....._ ....... ;. --.. .,...·~""" .. .,.....,____,., .-~ ----.-...--------'
1
.• zc .067047 C• tt•· FLOFIES RENTALS ' · · " . . $600.00.. CSDOC #3 REPAIRS .~,: »:. •. . . . · .. . .. 1'1
:;-· -· --~~~8~}-------~·~-:~~~.g~~·~ir~·~~~·~l{ f.v .. 1:1~IRA:._:._L~ ...... ~~~-···_. _;;.·_· -'~-· -~·t~i·;~~·:· .... . . · ·-H~~h~~{~~-l·~·F~:~·-·J.~._··::: .:·~f:. ~.~~:L~:L.~:~.~i~L ::
067050 FRANCE CO~PRESSOR PRODUCT $606.59 COMPRESSOR PARTS ~
067G51 GANAHL LUHBER co. S3t~76.10 BUILDING MATERIALS :
r---.. ~i67Q'"52 · GEN-CO . . ·· ~.. . · ' $58e 00 .!0 >' " . EUC'i'JffCAL$"0f'Pl"T .. •. ·:·'. • .· ".:~· : : '· ';{'if;: .... ,, ~o:"«'." ;· ·~ .. /.'" n;
061os3 GENERAL ELECTRIC suPPi..Y. ".-: · ·u,110~46 :. · , ELEcti\1cA~ sui>i>Lies.:. ;:_ ".: ... · .. ·. .. '' .. '~ \·: .. ::·" ':· · "'
11 . 06705'1 GENERAL .ff:LEPHQNE co •. , ·~. ::· .. ' ~·:~ .:·.:,·. ·· SSt954~4'l · .. · ···TELEPHONE . : · · .··.<{;.'_ ::·:.'." .. ._,/.i .. c-,\· -~ .•. 1
·.: : "·-----n 7()55·-·-------·--GiERLtCH-MiTCH[[[~JNf:---"s2 ;100:9~------PTPE-SUPrrrrr·---------...... . ..-..----~ JI
067056 DAVID A. GOFF $20.00 CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COHHITTEE MEETING ~
• 067057 HACH COHP~NY S224.32 LAB SUPPLIES : .--··--06nsa ___ .. ____ 6roif6Ef-;-tim-··co. ,......s357H9 '" VJrcvn _ 11
» 067059 . HALPRIN SUPPLY CO• S67'1•16 . :· .· SliALl HARDWARE. .._-.; .. .. 11
11 067060 MICHAEL HEINZ . . . S32~00 :,;.. EMPLOYEE H'lEAGE ::· ' · :-. . ·· ..
H -----o67i6r--"·------·t-toNrviJ£Lr-;,..IfJc~-----· -----·----i~E;:3·9 ··snTP-cHAns· -·
H 067062 HOUSE Cf 0A1TERIES S506.76 BATTERIES
" 067063 R.S. HUGHES CO., INC. $240.21 PAINT SUPPLIES
JI -·-o67liH _______ . --·--HURFLiESSCN'-Folms; INC ----. $37-;622.-48. uu-c·nAIUrE-l>VER"PAYMEl~~
" 067065 . CHY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S3,976•00 ·WATER U$EAGE . . . . ... "
... _. _. --{n~ ~-~-·-~--·-·----~~~~ l~~~g~-g~~~~l~Il.~~~--~-UH.~.-~-·-------·-~-: ______ : ,_· -i~~·~-:·2~ ·----~---·~~H{~-R~~~~u~ ~-~~---~~-·· __ ··~-~:..~,~~_: \I'
u C67068 JSCO COHP~NY S589.45 LAB SUPPLIES :
~ 067069 IMPERIAL ~EST CHEHICAL CO. S7 9 677.28 FERRIC CHLORIDE ~
•J -.. -----lf6'7l>70-----:---~-1N6iLUrJrA'FEff_______ .. . . $H"922. 95 ·.. . · J'JHnr·mu"Ar--~UfiHTis '· ..... ._, .......... , . .-: ... ·~ _. .... -. .::. ". "' .. ··"~· . ~'
06101i INTERox· ~f'ERICA 1 .. ·s3i,086~6~·:: ' · · HYDf\OGEN PEf\O~~D~ ·>.~·,.-","·~«·:._~.··;.; ".-.,~ .. ·-, .. ·:~;~ ... -< < -.~·:'_:>;::. ·::
'~ 067072 . JENSEN INSTRUHENTS. CO. . · · . .. " $62•52 "•.: ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES · .. : ,-. ... :;:".·:·:.·'."'. ... , ... -. .. :" .:· ~·:· " '---oc,·n73-----·-G[ORIA-P-:-Joii0Af.r---------·---·------·---. -----s2a.oo ----··-ci=nzrn•s--"AlHiTSoi\Y-coiUiTfTEEHEETiNG
067~74 KAHAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY $~~5.12 . BEARING SUPPLIES
067675 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. S62t429.40 CONT~ACTOR PW-108
1~ --.-.r~11rn;---------·-·RtNG arum~ ~·-·rnc·;-·-'"7-·~--.. -~ .. ·--.. -.. -.. -;-· ·i2;151t ;?1.·:· ," .· . eE;urrtrtr·su;;;>nn-~-. -.,-.~~~ .... ,,;--:;. '.;:-c:~~~·):~:;?·~':.,:,' .. ~ . .-;!~2'\
01 . 067071 . L & N· UNIFORM SUPPLY co·.". .·:. '. · .. ~·. $51526,57.:> . ._ .... •UNIFORM REN":fAL,.UsE·c~~Rt;~,o.v~~ A~tt~ .. ~·(:::·i·<:":::·~: .. ~'.·~i>a':.~I:
. O 6 7 0 7 8 . · L • B • M • S • t I NC • . · · . s 9 3 5 • l 7. " , · WE l 0 I NG SUPP LI E S . · . . ·. , , . : . : 1
) ., ·; , •. .. • " • '. .. '· :.-~ : ,z,----1r61 fi·79--··-----TA'Uft st R·cc L c fi--i1·0------------·---·-· -·s s-:·lo __ _._ __ "FTrR .. i>iH>c Ess· iNc ·-~ · · --I..
-------·· --·-----------·--·-·------------· ·-------.-.-. -·-------------·--·-.. ----------,., ,: .:,". ;· ... · -~t·· .. ~ t ,-
U I U I .;JI "'"'"'ll'H> \.At'llAL PROCESSING O~TE 12/2?/A3 PAGE 3 . -·-···-·····-. -....... .. . ·-REPORT "'tHiM.BER .. AP~~·····-:··--·~--~···-~--·~.--·-·'."""·--~~-···--·~--:··--... ..,.:;~--·
COUNTY S~NITATION OJSTRlCTS Of ORANGE. COUF'JTV . . . . . . .
...
--··---·· ..•...... ····-··-· .~.t.A !.~Lf~ HL!!! g~{.!!~. ··---·······----· ... ···-·-·-··---------··--·---·-----------···-----•
1-[ JI· l.IARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
• I l-~-0-61'0 Q o---·-··-·---~ TnfC 0 "•E l.Tq R re··· co-;-----··-... . .. . ... -----···--. . ... --··---··n;!ff7"".; it 3----·. --------·. El E c TR. CAL .. ·~u r pp Es----·-.---·-,----. -. --; ,.--·:; ~-. -. -·-·
Ofi108J LIDO HARJ"A VlLLAG£ $~05, 79 us~ CttAR(J~ OVERPAYttEHT ... •;;; . . . ' . . .. .
06708~ LJGHTING CJSTRIBUTORS, INC. ~192,22 ~LECTRICAL SUPPLI~$
Ill -lr670'83'---·-----nGHTTNG-PrA·sr1c-s--.rsso·c--;·9-·1Nc·;--·-------·· .... ----·--i~f6:5~-·--------·· EUCTR l"CAL""'SUPPU E·s·----··----·--------····--·-----
.. 06708'1 LOS ANGELES TIMES $2tl2il.30 LEGAL ADVERTISING
u 067085 lHE CHARLES LOME co. $268.75 PUHP PARTS
ll ------o·fl086 ·-·-··· .. ··--·-·· ·-uA~OLO HA~ c~n .. ·-·-. ---------·-.. .. ----·----· .. -··------~•20 ~"l)o""--·-------. c IT I ZEN ··s l\DV' SORv···-=011HHTE"~HHTTHCi _______ . _______ -...
" 061Qe7 GEORGi HA~ON S'tO~QO CfTIZEN'S ~PVtSQ~Y ~OHKIJTE~ ttE~TIHG ·
" 06708~ HATT • CH~ORt l~C, $1 1 157,35 PIPE $UPPLIE$ . " IT61G"89----·--pnlflCK"-HC'N'fTL-v ··-------· -· _____ _.._no-:-trn------·c·11TZEN 1 s···Aovrs·o·Rv--coHHITTE£-HEETING __________ --
u 067J90 ~EASUREHE~T VARIAULES $635.02 LAB SUPPLIES
~ 067691 PAULA L. fllLHAN $20.00 CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING •• -··""":'.~-onoCJ?··'!'-··. ··-----110-RGAN""-EOt::l PHF;NT-c<r;~-·--.-,----.... ··---:-,-:---:--.. ···---···-----·--·$-'flS; 02··--·-:--··-·--··1 RUC K-"PARTs-·--···--.-~--·· ·-·-··-'-·-·-·------·-·· .. ·-·--······---: ··-·-··-··-·--··· -·
r l1u 061093 E,B, HORHZ FOUNDRY ... $305.28 MANHOLE RINGS 4 CQVEf\S
" 06 7Ql3't HOTOROt,.A, H.JC, . . $'t 16. 58 PAGER SUPPLIES
,, li70~5 N"AT T'O'N'AL'TOH6tl\·-suP-PTY------------.. ··----$26l-:lPt-SHAL"t-·HARDWARr---··-··--·--·-·--·-··-·----·-
C ~ 067~Sb NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $1~2.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
» C67097 NOLAND PAFER CO. il'f2.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES
,. --·o(\70·~a----·---'N0ff'1Atr• s·;--ijf0'1ffr£·Q1JIP-;-inr;----··----·-:--:.---·-··-······-:---·· $72~-;·u·-·-----.. -.. -t'AP-SUPPL I~~ -:-----.,-------·::--~--· -·-·---·--·---··-···-·----·
" ,· Ofl0~9 , THE OLD SPAGHt:TH f APOR'( -· · J208•61t ' : U~E CHARG~ OV~RMYJ1Etff . , : : . ·
" 0~7100 OLYHF~C CHM.CA~ co, ~!$tlf58,'f9 .. · BULK CttLORl~E :' · . .
" [f6Tfl>T OR'~lfGrcm:NTY-A'UTl>-P"l"R'Ts-·c·o:-··-·-----· ···------,5-ii8":62----.RucK-·PARTs----------·--·-·· -. -·--··-···---··-·
( I" 067102 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING co. \ $797.82 PIPE SUPPLIES
067103 ORITEX CORP ; $263.77 SHALL HARDWARE
.. -··--·--crflto·'f ··--·· ·-·-. -onGrtrsERVrc~--------·----· -· · ··--··-··--· -·-·-·-·-··--$30-;oo----. --,....oEHURRAG~· ---·----.-----· ·--·--:--. --~-. -------····--·----·· ·
111 ·. Q~HD5 CQ, Of PR~NGl= .. AlH)ITOR ~ONTROJ.~ $5hl09~QP CPYOTE (:AffYO~ GATE.· FE~~. ' .
u· ::: Of,710,, COUNlY SAt\JTATIO~ Pl~TRlCTS OF Qf\Atf«iE COUtHY $'ft205,ftQ REP~~Nl~tt W9P.t<~l\S' ~()HP. flJ"P., ·. . ·
"ff6?TD7-----pp·cr1N'DUSlRTf"STTilC. ---·-------· ·-··----··--$63'3-:-lre P1\TNT-SUPPnes-----·--------------------·.
l• V.J 067108 P.IJ.A. PRINTING Slt534.88 MASTER PLAN-r1UNTING
::: 067109 PACIFIC MOBILE OFFICES 1564.54 PLANT 62 TRAILER RENTAL
" -·-··· Qflno ...... ·· ·-·--~·-···pAcnu; ·sun-v--E"ol}tPHosr-·~·o-... -·-··-·--·-···---. --·-.-·,-2-6·~·;·3·() nru·r1no·-s-uPrqe·r--~-.--"-. -:-~:--~-.,.-~--·-·-:-·-.--·-·
q6HU PACJflC TELEPttON~ . . . $321,37 ·: H~~H~Hl\INq . .
061112 PARTS U~LHHT~D.. ~50.09 TRUCK PART~ . . . 1 •a lT67H3" POSTffliSTfR . $llOO'()-;-(ro p·o·srAcr·----··-------------·-----:
I•• C.6711'1 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $3G.OO INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE 1
o 067115 R.E.O.J. $663.30 ORANGE COUNTY INDEX I
0 ··· ·-· ·Q67 P€» ····-· .... · ..... ,... .. rnt-~E <n~H~-·----··::-· ·-:---·:-·i--:~ .. --··:···---, -: ···;~.,...-·~--:;""":--:· ·-·011+57-;--,o ·----~~·~::-c·r·AS·s-rnEP ·~Mrn-a:.~QAt:'~A1>V~RTHTttG-~~"'° .. -:7:~-.,~---·.,.~---·, .. ····1
l 1u t;67ll7 REX~ORO E~HTRONIC p~·9p~CJS .. '· ' ' · ,., . $6J 9 27 . ·. ; ~lt:CTRICAL $UP.rt.I~~ :;. ..... : !' ;· . / . . !
06711~ ROBBJN$ & "EVERS . $3t208,'t2 ._ ;. PU11P rART$ ',··:· '
•• -0671·19--nrumnn:-AllBlllfSrOlfD -----·-·--· iTlf!;'76 TRUCl\PARTs--------·----------·1 "I 067120 ROBOZ SURGICAL INSTRUHENT co. $44.52 LAB SUPPLIES
:: -. ----~: ~: ~ ~ . . . . -... ---~ ~~-~~~~-~ ' ~: ~~: ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~N~-~'f NC..,----------.·--·· --· ··-·· ------·~ ! * ~: ~; ~ ~·---~--::~.·--~ ~ ~ E·~·~-~; ~~I{~~~-~.!! V ~!_N~~~--··-··-~--~-"7T°---~-~~~-----
06. 7~23 ~' J CHEV~OLCT . . . . . . $2,Q~ .· . TRUCI( rAfn~ .... ' ''. ·, .· ·~ . -,: .. ::,. '. ·, J. -.;. :, ... .
"'l Of..7l~4 SAND POLL AR PU~INESS fO~ffS $l6, 79. . . ()Ff IC~ FORM .. ~:.:. ·. . ,, .:. >. '.",, ' ;~. · . : ...... ·,:.,
i1---0·61r2s nn---or-snrlfr·Kc·R ,133:-1·0 WATER-u·se·ArrE
('•bl
..--~, t.•
I
'
)
. ' )
~
? . "' ( )
., ..
··--····-~·-------~----·~--··---~=~··· ..•.• :~~\~C7---~~'?ZZ:J;-j
1, . ' ~
/ -
( <c.
. . ,.
~ .. . -' .~
__ FUN!! ~( ... ?_!~9--~ ~' _01_~~ UC~K ING_ C~P._!_!A~ ----·-...... --.... ____ { ....... ---.•. ----· :~~g~~s~~=B~;i~pw22!!~.!~---L-J ---,-,--~-,..,,,.. . .,. '.
·-----·-· ---_ _ _ _ -·---.. --·-__ ... _ ...... __ ----~~UN~ y SAN 1 ~m ;~ ~;_ ~ t~m~t~ 3 o~~ NG~. c_o_uN ~ v_ •. ···•· _ _ _ ---· ~--------··-··-·-~-··· _·. ·• ':·. '.·U ',:l;~~(:J
" WARR ANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DES CR IPTJ ON
'
-·--pfll?6 ____ ---·:----·-SEr-·QPTICS . --···-------------... ------·-------·-·-----·-------·--$'1"!';50 --·---·· --SAfET'rq·LAls~·s···· -~---_-----~-:----. , · ... : ·· ·: ~ -. . ... .. . :
O~H~7 SHAHROCt< SUff~Y Ot8'33,o\9 TOOLS .. -~:,.:··1;-',)" ... :·1
•M ---~.g~~·=--------··-----~A.~Rr~~!;~-~~rn-c·o-.-.--nrc-;-----------------------,3;-~U;J~-------·----·· -~~~-:~~~aR¢~.Y.H~!ff __ eo~tH.IH~_l!UTJ.H!L_i_~~~-.... : ·.·. :~
11 0 6 71 '3 O PH I L S Yo IT H $ 2 0 • 0 0 C I T I Z EN 1 S ADV I S 0 RY C 0 H H I TT E E HE ET I NG :~1 :: ___ --·~:~ g~ .. _ ... _. ___ ~~~~~t~~A~!J. ~~~ 1-~~I ~~ff~-~~~ NI __ ._ -··-.. --~-----··· _$8 2 :~~-~-;~}~------·· .. ~~t~~ ~-f ~~~ ~ ~~-~!~------·-·-------·--.. ~-~----..--~---. ·-::
H 06713~ $QUTHE~N COUNTIES OJf-co~ U9,l36,03 PIEHL FUEL . . . . . . ' . ·: .". -·~;. ·~ . -. ::I ·~ 06713~ SPACE SPRJ~Ci S. STAHPING CO, · · $236.~3 · PIPE surPJ-1~$.., ... ''. .;-. . ·'-·:: . ~:'.~· 1,.!/._ ··; •:-·. ",.,
.. DEi71~-· ·sr-ARi<nnr·o-RlNKlNG°UA"f[R ---·------$623.25·-·· eo·nL-Eo·-~IATER____ . '. ti
11 067136 SPEED£ SPEECOHETER $3 9 125.34 TRUCK PARTS 11
•• 0 6 71 3 7 STAR 01J STEEL $ H 2. O 2 STE EL ST 0 C K _ _ ;:
., ·-·--"Of;i} 138 ....... ·-·--:--·····scOTT. ·s TE Y~N~' ....... ·-------· -------:---·-· -----~-.,-· ··--·---·-· ~ -··---•·$5l. fl4---·-··-----·--:--· DtPt:OYEf"'H•t ~f!\9~··-··'""'."'·:--:~-----.'.-:;-:--. -..... -.. -. -.-. -.. ~7 . ~ :.,:"• .. ..,.~
1.H06713~ STREM CttE~ICALS, INC. . U82.CJ'l · . OIPHU4Yl-11~RqJ~Y »<· .• · ·,. · · · ..... ·. · :._ .. ·. ,.:-; · '.·,.
" · op n,. o THE suPPLl E~s $2, 1a2 · u· Pu11r rAf\H . · !:. :: . ., -.· '.... .. -<.-... · ., .. :. · · .... \_ .. ,.. .. ,.
u ~·11T1--------·s11n~FiA'lfl-·ru:t·nac--ccf~-;-1wc. --·-iH-!-99 ECH"TR .. 1 cAr·s·up·prru--------:~-·--·----· ,,
1•'
067l't2 SYBRON -CASTLE U'H.00 LAB MAINTENANCE "'I
ti ---·-····--00~ 7711 ~~--·---··---·------· _TT~RO~PcS.oONR~·c:···A· co••t"R·-c·o---·---------.-------······-------·--:-----·-··-·~~ !.~3 ?.:...~.!...-~--:--·------PO~Fl.NSTH~_SRUE PBUl_ o,.~ c:' ~.!~!E,M_r' ~~R ~e-~ .. !!~!:~.·-, "-.~.-~-~E.~.I ~G r-~-· ;;
I\ .... .,., . ,n re •H-,. . . ·· $1.7,(>6 0, p. ~.,·" ·.: ' .. ·• .. ··., ', . .' '.' '· .:· "'
,. 0671~5 TJHE CLOCK SAJ.ES & ~ERV1CE . 036,~0 TIME CLQ~K R~PAlf\~ .... :i· .. . .. :ii,
11 ~ ~ 11 It~ TONY 'S L C ~ J< i SA H . SER V I ~ E $ 37 9 , "1 · · LO C ~ $ . . ,-~ · . ~ :" o·nro aucirr-,n:10-·srrP-PrvtlNt. u;302.os 11mcK_P_A_Rrs--· · l•I
(In 067l't8 J.G. TUCKER & SON, INC. UH.17 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~
• ~ G611q9 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE i115.9q DELIVERY SERVICE : .. --n---·op115·0··-·····-···-··~··urnn:p····~r~r:.;·A·L·~--~·<r;·--,-···-·--~~-:--···-·-·-·-T---~~---··-...,-·ni!r;6~---:·-~-::-~-r:-.... -·PfArtCRENrAn··-~-·-i:~~.-~.,·-·;~·:-·-~~-:-""~.·-:--.-/·,:7:7::~·--· .;'
•: L Of> n 61 · · ywR ~c u:tinnc · . . · · · .. ,~ ~3s~. o~ · ·, , : t.AQ Sl,IPP'-t ~s · . , . ·: : :'·: -· ::"_.< . · ''1)j.. ... . . :_>;>i~·:_ · :~!
u'""'"" C67l.~2 VM.~EY PITIES SUPPLY po, . ·' ·. '_lllh75 ·-: ... •., . PIPE SUPP.~ln . ·-: ....... :.:::. ··.'.; '.1 .\· : .( ' •;;(<-,.. "I
,. i611'5'3 VALVE & SfEU-SiJPPL Y co. $1,630.86 VALVB-· . 1~,
A 06715~ VARIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. $31226.50 LAB EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE :
1'i 067155 VAUGHAt.:•S lt\OUSTRIAL REPAIR CO $320.00 TOOLS ...
JI····-·-· 09115~--·:.··~····-.----, .. -~A'~~---~r~~n··~oo1o~A~----·~-~--~-_,-. --·. -:-·~-:-· -.~~--: .. -lf;9257;l6----·-:-:-·(EGAI--~A'ovrn1rntrq·~.::, .. ·1. -.J··::-·-;: ~-· ·.· . \ '·:.:-,(.· .. , ... _.·I
" P.~Hn CARl. WARREN e (:O,, . . . ' 's59.,03 ' LIAQIL'IT( HA.111LAPttttflH"~T06'·:.,;'.:::;;;~: -~ .. :'..r:·: . .-·::· • .\.~" :::·
I> 0~7156 .,AUl<~St1~ ENGft"E SERVlCENTER $6,095,!\0 ~NGltH PART$ .:. j ':·:-1>:)/::::~ .. ; .. ·<: .. ·-:·-~.:~~:f·L(: j,,'"'.:'.·~_.>;: .. , .. : · )
•• o-n·rs-9 UESlrRTTrtfttiil>"COGv-ASSlfc,·nrs $2 1129. 00 EQllTJS1f£Nl--RE""P7ff){ . . ~i1
I
•• 06 7 H:O IJES Tl NGHOUSE EL EC TR l C CORP $714 • 80 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~11 ~ 0671~1 WHITE, fl~[ & VERVILLE Jl 1 377.84 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY ~
n --~-·-onu2· ....... ------.,·--~JHG-s·c IEt\l lfJc-~-:--·--~---·-----,.·-.:-::"T'.::--;-,·:-·-··~··-~if~"f--fS··~~c.-,fO-S.UPPll~S~...,.77~.'. ~": !,: · i :~'.-:·:···;''':.:: '1.,..:-; .··~~;:.-'T'.!'1"r~~-.. ,j
H • OflH~3 · . · · XEROX CORF,· · ·. . , · "' >·/, ·· ~ · "~'66/t;IU."'·1 ' · · _ ,: XEROX f\EPROPUHJQt(Y·: .. :>\. i:}:.::.~<Y:;t>.:.·:<:~.~.::,,,,i .. '-t.,·'..'.:·:i'',j;'".: .... ,
· . ~~}~·~--"--~rb~~~RtAlfonv-A-sso~T.cn:"s · · .. ~; '.:'.': -.·,»'. ," !:~!:~!·.'. .···:..:1 ·,'t~~-g~Rl~·!·µs-~i>is-d~~<:,.~;:.} .... ~,;.';:::·:·:;:'/'tl{·::::\:)'}.:·.;-_::~;r.:;'<;\·.,, · :~::
'·
\.
n
--------~-
... -TPTA~--l&:Altt~ -p;qo-)2728/~3----=--·rn3-·9lif-~Pt . -~----~--~~·-~-. \ -'-::'~~..-~-· ..... -. -...-.~~---·-] 11
· . · · -; · · ~ <'.: : .~·=·~~tr~~~~~:~~ ;i· ~ ·(· :< . -• , :: . : . ·.; .. :: .·:. ~ ,,Jlit'. ~/;;:tt.;E~~:;):h<·:: '.: ~1.~:t ;i~_~:. -~11
I
...
"'
-----------·---._, _____ --· " -::~~[:827J:Z;,c .. : ).(;::Ih i -\ t].};\~li:~~&~~~;i*~;f ~:~~-ff ,~~f;t!:?~;~(~:~;~0/i~t;ti£t?JJ
n
'·
'U
//
(
/
v
,,
_) "'·
9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ' PROCESSING DATE 12/22/83 PAGE 5
I
(
),,
( '
\··
-;:~ \~~,:F~i;':f'.;.!~¥'.:t11r_0/~'.~!~;1~tr;·y --~ •-· i\6ti~f ~-~-~-~Wti1 ~-~-' miw~y~ 1~ tj!~~(f ':;'.~;t ~~ ';"q,~!-~"; ;tp'1.!/f':~;· .-,_ •·. :'.~~~---.
AMOUNT
=~ :
:') ~. ~:' ·• t ' '. ~ $ 1: '~
·f
~} ... ti. :':": ··?~1?1 ··}?_' , a ; a. 4 2 ! ;':'.'i:"J"":'; ·"!r-"?.";~ .. ::-;!:':";7 · '). -------
io 12 OPER FUND 2 t S:6ii-----------------------------------------·
II 12 ACO FUND 11t2.37
11 0 P E R_f_IJN 0 1 0 , 1 2 1 • 1 1 . .
::,:. '/IS ~~g/~~~D .'.;-':~·\,,····:<· · .. :.;:,·:-.~<.,'.·:· ":\ >?::''/ >; '·\.:. i:"·'>:;.~·_i.4;\·:·:_·>:~.($.;a~f~t~·.;~,·. ,_:,:;7:·:.:1<: ·.· -::·· :'-_:· -.-~::-.· ..... • ,·:::"'· <('.·::::·;· ...
·~ ~ u _~(;1LrnNP.. . , . ,. : ,-·.a u.~!rn · · ... ·· ___ _.;. _________ . --· --~-·-· _: -· -
~ 17 OPER FUND 2,081.27
" #7 ACO FUND Bit 3. 20
11 11 !_ru>JJLflHU> 1 I 2" 5 • I 6 -~----:: ia/~~E:u~~t.o ::._ .. ,; _.:· .... >.!.-:·.-,;· _;·., ::. <........ .· ··· r ··:·: '}~L~~:~~r :--~,..:~< :~c ,· .. :
11 _N_6~L~e~R J:u~.i>-.~--------· .:. :. . ; ...... ' , .. . --1~-~ll_. ;_.' :'
\ ...... \
! ;:
----·--··------~------·--------· 11 n J T OPE R FUN 0 It 3't , 1 8 8 . 5 I
,n ·a CORF 196,955.73
"~ SELF UNJ!f!L.b.IA~IJ..J..LLHAIHl .. JJ!SURANCE FUND ~~-.o~_..,..._.,.........._..,....,..., ___ .,...--...,........,..--..,...,~--
,. -~,';. SELF UNOEO WQl\KERs•·:·coMp.· INSU~ANU,FUND,· ·:·,1 ... '::> .... : .-···4.7ss:iia -:::. .,.... . ..
1' JT wo KING CAPITAL FUND · · ·' .·.:" : · ... ,a3.11e.11t
JI•·
II
I n
·-~---·-----_._:.------·------------·--·-----
TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 12/28/83 $773,938.91t
-----·-----... --· ----·-·-·"-.. ···· ···------·-----·-·····----~ .....
.-. -. ~' ,)·;.'::_,·,~ "'· .',~ -,-..· ;:·: .•. _., . ;' •.': ·I .. ;
St
• ,.
1JI• , r--~----.--~-. ----. -. -...
JI
',:
, ~ t ., • ': •ic:/ . , I ~ .. ~~ ,*.
·--~--·-·-:. .. ___ . __ ..._ ___ ._
~·-~ :--:-·-,.-.--. _-, .~-~-:;.-~:--.. -. -.. --.--... -.,-,' .. «'•II
",,
·.,:!'. .. ,,
n. -----------------. ---·-··----· . _____ ;... .. __ ·------------·----· ------·------'...-----------------------------·--·--·---------·---·------------------------
1$1 ,:: , .. --. --,-:-;-< .: ·~···;:~~~: ...... .'· .' ·,...-.---.... ----c----·-··-.,....._.,....,, ...... --· ~~~---:--·-.. -. ~ .. -. _ .. -. t··· ' ~-.-.-~~l-. -.-. -, .. ->·;-.>:.~\.~ 1:
~-..... ~ •\ ----·---.. --~---.. ·-----... -···-·----·------··--··-----.:... ·--·---------------.. -
-------:~----·----·---~-. -. ·---------,.-·--· --------.------·-··~-----· --· -:---~---··----------· .. ----·--4-----~--·-·~-----~ -·-···~----. ----·---~-·· ....
.. ---(-.-----·--·· -..!...-···--·-·-----..:.. .. :...:.:. ___ ._ ___ ·---~---···"-~~;_~_: _. ~~~~c.:.---~ = :_\'.f r;;~f,: ~
\_ " ' , '10
11,
j~ __ :.._ ___ --·----------··--· -~-···-... -----·---··-·-------·
I\~ -·------· _( _. ·----• ---• • . • •• !'s-·. "t•O. ..
... St:· . ------~.L!C
-.
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
FEBRUARY 8J 1984 -7:30 P.M.
ALL DISTRICTS
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the Board of
Supervisors re appointment of Directors and seating new members of the Boards:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 Roger R. Stanton Harriett M. Wieder
ALL DISTRICTS
(16) (a) Consideration of motion approving actions to allow expediting of
projects that will enhance the Districts' ability to meet NPDES Permit
requirements:
DISTRICT 2
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-20, approving plans and
specifications for Piping for Return Sludge Chlorination at
Plant No. 2 Secondary Settling Basins, Job No . PW-123, to improve
the settling of solids, and authorizing the General Manager to
receive bids and award a contract to the low bidder in an amount
not to exceed $80,000.00. See page "I"
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed on a force
account basis to Modify One Dissolved Air Flotation (OAF) Unit at
Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment Facilities, Job No. PW-124, to
improve solids capture, at a cost not to exceed $18 ,000.00
(30) (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-21-2, ordering annexation of
5.266 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south of the
intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Sycamore Circle in the City of
Villa Park, proposed Annexation No. 54 -Tract No. 10523 to County
Sanitation District No. 2. See page "II"
~'
RESOLUTION NO. 84-20
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. PW-123
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2,· 3, S,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE CO~TY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIPING FOR RETURN SLUDGE
CHLORINATION AT PLANT NO. 2 SECONDARY SETTLING BASINS,
JOB NO. PW-123
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Bbards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts hereby
determine that the project for Piping for Return Sludge Chlorination at Plant
No. 2 Secondary Settling Basins, Job No. PW-123, is categorically exempt from
further CEQA requirements, in accordance with said Guidelines, and that Secretary be
authorized and directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of the
County of Orange; and,
Section 2. Thaf _the project for construction of Piping for Return Sludge
Chlorination at Plant No. 2 Secondary Settling Basins, Job No. PW-123, is hereby
approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said
Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this
day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer, for
construction of Piping for Return Sludge Chlorination at Plant No. 2 Secondary
Settling Basins, Job No. PW-123, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(A)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
I x .. --.... -1
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State
of California; and, ,
section s. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and \...,)
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read;· and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer be
authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
Section 7. That the General Manager be authorized to award a contract for
I\ i Piping for Return Sludge Chlorination at Plant No. 2 Secondary Settling Ba~~ns, Job
No. PW-123, to the low bidder in an amount not to exceed $80,000.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 8, 1984.
II I -2'~ AGENDA ITEM #16(A)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
RF.SOLUTION NO. 84-21-2
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 54 -TRAcr NO. 10523)
A RF.sOLO'l'ION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 0-,:' ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF 'I'ERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 54 -TRACT NO. 10523
TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 2 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition
filed by the property owner; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965)
of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has
heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Conunission for annexation of said ....,.;
territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by Wells Fargo Real Estate Trust
Department, Harold G. Peters, M.D. and Thomas Stabile, the owner of said property· to
be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 82-158-2, filed with said Commission by the
District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory
proposed to be annexed is nAnnexation No. 54 -Tract No. 10523 to County Sanitation
District No. 2", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and
shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this
resolution; and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and,
Section s. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory, and,
"II-1" AGENDA ITEM #30(A) -DISTRICT 2 "Il-1"
Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation_acr_eage_ fees in the
amount of $8,509.86 has been satisfied; and,
Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad.valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and
Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation
Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6
~of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory he~~inbefore referred to and
jl t'\
described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation
District No. 2 without notice or hearing and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 8, 1984.
II I I -2" AGENDA ITEM #30(A) -DISTRICT 2 "11-2"
Bf : ~AGENDA ITEM #29 (A)
January 30, 1984
INTERIM REPORT OF THE
DISTRICT NO. 13 STEERING COMMITTEE
RE PROPOSED BOUNDARY MODIFICATION
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
P.0 .BOX 8127
10844 ELLI S AVENUE
FOUNTAI N VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9 27 08
(71 4) 540-2910
(714)962-24 11
The proposed formation of District 13 is a result of the
agreement negotiated with the County of Orange to settle the AB 8
issue of tax exchanges for newly annexing properties otherwise
tributary to Districts 2 and 7. Consultants are now preparing
the engineering and environmental reports required to form
District 13. In the intervening period, approximately 1170
properties proposed to be included within the original boundaries
of District No. 13 have been developed and are now occupied.
The District No. 13 Steering Committee met on January 18th to
consider the impact of this development on the formation
proceedings. In order that the formation of District No. 13
proceeds immediately and preliminary documents filed with LAFC,
the Committee is recommending that the boundary of District No.
13 be modified to exclude the 1170 developed properties. Because
these properties have been tax-zeroed, the issue of how they are
to pay for annual operating and maintenance costs would be
addressed separately by Districts 2 and 7.
The major advantage of keeping these properties within the
existing boundaries of Districts 2 and 7 is that it would
accomodate the formation proceedings because it would minimize
public opposition to the formation of District 13 from current
homeowners that would be affected. The major disadvantage is
that this property has been "tax-zeroed" and, t h us, will not
receive annual ad valorem property taxes required to pay for
sewerage services.
To avoid any additional lots falling into this category, the
affected cities and the County have been requested to have future
buyers sign an acknowledgement that their property will be in the
new District 13 and that they will be subject to sewer use fees.
Enclosed is a sample copy of the letter of request and the Notice
to Owners/Occupants acknowledgement form that has been sent to
each City and the County EMA.
Joint Chairman Holt and Director Wedaa volunteered to meet with
members of the Board of Supervisors to update them of the
progress made to date and to seek support for use of SDAF funds
to provide for financing of District No. 13 operations and
maintenance costs during its first year of operation plus
offsetting funds for the aforementioned inhabited areas presently
tax-zeroed.
.-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. SOX 8127. rOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALlrORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID Orr-RAMP. SAN DIEGO F"REC:WAY)
LETTERS SENT TO: Cities of Anaheim, Brea,
Orange, Yorba Linda and
the County of Orange/EMA
Subject: Sanitation District User Fee
December 7, 1983
TE l. E ?H 0 N ES:
AREA CCOE 714
540-2910
962-2411
This office is in the process of forming new County Sanitation District No. 13.
District No. 13 will provide sewage treatment and disposal service for the
territory within the boundaries set forth on the enclosed map which is, in the
most part, now developed or in the process of development in your City. The
annual costs for sewerage service provided by District No. 13 wil l be financed
by a user fee to be assessed against developed property and collected each year
on the owner's property tax bill. The amo unt of the User Fee has not yet been
determined.
In order that prospective property owners are fully informed that they will be
subject to an annual cost, we request that each purchaser of property within the
area designated on the map be required to sign the attached Notice to
Owners/Occupants statement acknowledging that an annual User Fee will be lev ied.
Please have the form signed in t r ipl icate. One copy shall be retained by the
City, one by the property owner and one forwarded to t his office.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions or need
additional informat io n, please contact the undersigned.
Attachme nts: 1) Map of User Fee Area
2) Notice to Owners /Occupants
Thomas M. Dawes
Deputy Chief Engineer
NOT 1C E TO OW NE RS/OCCU PANTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
ot 0 RANGE C OUNTY. CALI FORNIA
P 0 .BOX 8127
10844 ELL IS AVENUE
i'OUNTAIN VALL!:Y, CA LI FORNIA 9270 8
(7 1.!) 540-2910
(7 14) 962·241 1
YOU AR E HEREBY NOT1FIED that you may be charged an annual user f ee by t he
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, which provides sewage
treatment services in this area, to cove r the operation and maintenance costs
associated with pr oviding service to your dwelling . Such user fee may be in an
annual amount necessary to recover the actual costs i ncurre d by the Districts
for providing operations and maintenance.
If you have questions regarding this info r mation , y ou ma y cal l the County
Sanitation Districts, telephone (714 ) 540 -2910, extension 257.
I /we have read the above Notice.
Date Signature
Si gnature
Tract: Lot: ------
JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS
FEBRUARY 8, 1984
1) SINCE NOVEMBER 29 THERE HAS BEEN CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WITH
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AS TO WHETHER OR
NOT THE SCREEN CHECK REVIEW DRAFT OF THE E!R/EIS DOCUMENT FOR
ULTIMATE SLUDGE DISPOSAL PREPARED BY OUR CONSULTANT IS A PUBLIC
DOCUMENT. ALSO, IS THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY A "RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY" IN THIS MATTER? I BELIEVE THE MATTER HAS BEEN RESOLVED
TO THE CITY'S SATISFACTION, SINCE THE DISTRICTS HAVE GIVEN THE
CITY A COPY OF THE REPORT AND OUR LEGAL COUNSEL HAS DETERMINED
THAT IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE THE CITY IS A RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY.
2) FOUR DIRECTORS, INCLUDING MYSELF, ATTENDED THE CASA GENERAL
MEETING JANUARY 26-28 IN INDIAN WELLS. THE SUBJECTS OF
DISCUSSION WERE:
-PRIVATIZATION AND FINANCING FOR THE 80'S
-THE STATE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM
-MAJOR ISSUES FACING THE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
-FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GRANTS PROGRAM, AND
-NEW LEGAL LIABILITY THREATS IN THE 80's
SPEAKERS ON THESE SUBJECTS WERE:
A MEMBER OF THE STATE CONTROL BOARD,
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD,
THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAM OPERATION EPA WASHINGTON,
PLUS NUMEROUS REGULAR CASA MEMBER REPRESENTATIVES AND ASSOCIATES
REMARKS (CONT'D)
2) CASA MEETING-CONTINU~D ...
ALSO CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HELD THROUGHOUT THE MEETING
CONCERNING THE STATE BOARD SUBCHAPTER 15 REVISIONS AND
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO
WASTE DISPOSAL TO LAND.
<DON: You MAY WANT TO CALL ON THESE GENTLEMEN FOR ANY ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS: DICK EDGAR, BRUCE FINLAYSON, DON SMITH )
3) THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING WILL BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 29TH
AT 5:30 P.M.
INVITE TWO DIRECTORS:
--------..::: ~ AN {OUAN E WINTERS
SAM COOPER
NORM CULVER
THE BACK OF TONIGHT'S MEETING NOTICE INDICATES THE MARCH
EXECUTIVE MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THE 22ND. THIS IS IN ERROR;
THE MEETING WILL BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 28TH.
4) As REPORTED IN THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S REPORT TO THE JOINT
BOARDS, THE 30l(H) WAIVER HEARING, SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 10,
WAS CANCELLED. PRESENT TONIGHT IS JIM ANDERSON, THE EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF THE REGIONAL BOARD WHO HAS GRACIOUSLY VOLUNTEER ED TO
BE HERE TONIGHT TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS
YOU MAY HAVE. IT IS MY PLEASURE TO INTRODUCE JIM AND ERSON,
EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD .
. .' l/''c:ouNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
January 12, 1984
Honorable Marvin P. Adler, Mayor
Honorable Barbara Brown, Council Member
City of Fountain Valley
12000 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
Dear Marv and Barbara:
Shortly after receipt of the letter dated December 22,
1983, addressed to Fred Harper from the law firm of Latham
TELEPHONES:
AREA COOE 714
540-2910
962-2411
& Watkins, relating to the City of Fountain Valley's concerns
over the Ultimate Sludge Disposal Alternatives Study, I met
and conferred with Fred and the Staff, as well as with the
District's General Counsel.
As I believe you know, this project has been substantially
funded by a grant from the Environmental Protection Agency
(75%), the State Water Resources Control Board (12-1/2%), and
the balance with the District's own funds.
I am sure you ar~ also keenly aware of the extraordinary
efforts by the District to insure that this project receive
the broadest and all-encompassing public review, particularly
in those communities where any of the alternatives could be
located. We have, at the direction of EPA, and because of
our concurring approval, appointed a Citizens Advisory Committee,
and expended significant effort and money to have this most
difficult issue of sludge disposal reviewed in a thorough and
complete manner.
I must indicate that I.was d~eply concerned when advised
that the City had retained counsel to file suit against the
District for our alleged failure to include the City in the
decision-making process. Under-separate cover, you were provided
last week with a copy of the consultanf 's initial draft document
leading towards the preparation of a f~rm~l "draft EIR". As
indicated, this was never a subject that was designed to be
kept secret or hidden from the City of Fountain Valley~or any
other group of persons, but was in keeping with the procedural
requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency ..
. .. .·
Page Two
January 12, 1984
Your counsel has also indicated a demapd that the City
be designated as a "responsible agency" regarding this study
project. Again, we have initially reviewed this with the idea
that the truly responsible agencies were EPA, the State Water
Resources Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control
Board, since they are the entities engaged in the licensing
and approval of our sludge disposal methods. However, the
Staff has now also determined that because of the possible
requirement for new traffic controls, the City of Fountain
Valley could have certain discretionary authority relative
to the installation of such controls and the placement thereof.
Thus, the City would be legally defined as a "responsible
agency" under CEQA.
In my mind, that designation is in fact making no change
from the clear intent of the District to be totally forthright
and to make full and honest disclosures to the City of Fountain
Valley and to all other residents in the County as to every
single bit of information relating to this study. Nevertheless,
on advice of our counsel, the Staff has advised the City and
its attorneys that the City will be designated a "responsible
agency" for this project, and this will hopefully provide the
City with the extra assurance it apparently seeks--namely,
to be certain that its input into this project will be fully
considered.
I would certainly hope that since both of the demands
raised by the City's attorneys--namely, the receipt of the
draft document and being designated as· a "responsible agency"
have been met, this would now fully satisfy your concerns, ·
and that the instigation of any litigation would be set aside.
Obviously, since Fountain Valley is a member agency, the District
would not look forward to engaging in such litigation, and
I certainly see no purposes to be gained. If you in fact have
a different thought on this, I would appreciate your sharing
it with me, so that any remaining, unanswered questions can
be addressed.
Trusting that we have now resolved this in a satisfactory
manner to all, I remain,
Very truly yours,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Donald Holt, Chairman
JAMES G. ROURKE
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF"
ALAN R. WATTS
KENNARD R. SMART, JR.
DANIEL K. SPRADLIN
LYDIA S. LEVIN
MARK T. WILLMAN
SUZANNE D. ATKINS
LAW OFFICES OF'
A PROFESSION"L CORPOR"TION
SUITE 1020
CALIFORNIA F'IRST BANK BUILDING
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
TELEPHONE (714) 835-6212
January 12, 1984
William W. Wynder, Esq.
Latham & Watkins
66-0 Newport Center Drive
Suite 1400
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
Dear Mr. Wynder:
TELECOPtER: l7t41 835•7787
CABLC ADDRESS: RORwOOD
TELEX: eo-~29~
Your letter of December 22, 1983, addressed to Fred A.
Harper, General Manager of the County Sanitation Districts,
has been referred to this office for response. In preparation,
we have extensively reviewed the files and records of the
Sanitation Districts, including specific reports relating to
the scope of the studies presently under preparation by the
Districts.
Under separate cover, your client has recently been provided
with a copy of the preliminary working document relating to
the study of the Ultimate Solids Disposal Project Alternatives.
This document, when completed, will constitute the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, which will be dis-
tributed for review, comment. and action in accordance with
the guidelines and legal requirements of both the National
Environmental Protection Act and the California Environmental
Quality Act. We believe that this satisfies all of the issues
addressed in your letter relating to the study document.
With regards to the designation of the City of Fountain
Valley as a "responsible agency", we have determined that in
fact the co-combustion alternative and the mechanical composting
alternative could generate additional traffic and the need
for new access to the Districts' .property and the installation
of traffic signal controls·. Recognizing that the placement
and installation of those controls are within the control of
the City, we have advised.our ·client that the City does have
certain discretionary authority relative to the decision on
the installation and placement of such controls. Accordingly,
for· the purposes of this project as envisioned by both CEQA
and NEPA, the City would be considered a 11 responsible agency".
Page Two
January 12, 1984
Based thereon, the Districts are now taking.all required measures
to insure that each and all requirements of CEQA and NEPA,
as they pertain to responsible agencies, be provided to the
City and performed in accordance with the legal requirements.
The City has never been denied an opportunity to submit
its input on this study project to the Districts~ and in fact,
significant information and data have already been provided
by the City and will be included within the study. However,
the Districts will look forward to receiving any and all other
information which the City wishes to provide, both in the pre-
paration of the completed Draft Supplemental EIR, as well as,
of course, comments on the Draft and preparation of a Final
Supplemental EIR.
If you have any further questions, please call me, and
I will be most happy to respond immediately.
TLW:pj
Very truly yours,
ROURKE & WOODRUFF
1 ~maJ ~ ~~C-//'·
/';homas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
MEETING DATE Feb. 8, 1984
DISTRICT l
TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7&11
JOINT BOARDS
(CRANK),,,,,,, .HANSON •• I ••• """'
(LUXEMBOURGERL GRlSET I I I I I,--;:;;;;' ----
(HOESTEREY) •••• SALTARELLI I.~ ----
(WlEDER) ••••••• STANTON •••• ·~::::::::
DISTRICi 2
(MURPHY),,,,,,,WEDAA,,,,,,,~---
(OVERHOLT),,,,.,ROTH, I I. I I I·~--== (ADLER),,,,,,,.~ ••••••• ~ ____ __
!NELSON) I I I. I •• COOPER •• I I I·~ ----
KUZNIK). 11. It I HOLT •• 11 I I I·~-----
LUXEMijOURGERJ t GRIS ET I. I I. I .......... ----
(ODLUM). I. I 11 I I KAWANAMI I I I.~-----
(CULVER) ••••••• PERRY ••••••• ~
(BEYER),, ,,,,,,SMITH,,,,, •• ~::::::::::::
(WIEDER),, ,,,,,STANTON,,,,·~--__
(HOLMBERGL 11I.WEDEL.11 I I I·~----
(CATLIN) ••••••• WINTERS •••• ·---____ _
DISTRICT 3
(OLSON),,,,,,,,FINLAYSON.,, ._..,... ___ _
(PARTIN),,,,,,,MULLEN,,,,,,~---__
(ADLER). I I I I I •• BRO tilt; •• I. I·~ -----
(PERRY). I I I I ••• CULVER ••• I I·~----(SEIDEL) ••••••• FRESE ••••••• '-'""' ____ _
(RISNER),,,,,,,GRGAS,,,,,,,~ ~ __
(DAVIS),,,,,,, .GRIFFIN, •• ,.~ ____ _
(LUXEMBOURGERLGRISET •• I I··~----(RELL>. ••• ,,,, ,MARSHOTT. • • •--"111!!!:=--__
(COOPER) ••••••• NELSON •• Ill·~ ----
(OVERHOLT) 11. I. ROTH. I I I I I I·~ ----
(WIEDER),, ••••• STANTON ••••• ~ --__
(SELVAGGI). I I •• SYLVIA. 1111 ·~ ----
(MAND IC),, Ill I .THOMAS •• I···~ ----· (HOLMBERG),,,,,WEDEL,,,,,,, ~ __
(CATLIN),, Ill I .WINTERS. II I I -----
ulSTRICT 5
(MAURERL I I •• 11 HART. I I I I. I·~----(HEATHER) •••••• PLUMMER •• •••-.......-_____ _
(WIEDER) ••••••• STANTON ••• I·~-----
DISTRICT 5
(SMITH) •• I ••••• WAHNER ••• ···~ ------(MAURER) ••••••• HART •••••• ··~ ____ __
(WIEOER),,,,,,,STANTQN,, ···~---__
DISTRICT 7
(BEYER),,,,,,, .SMITH,,,, ••• ~~--___
(MAURER),,,,,, .HART,,,,,,,.~ ___ ~--
(HOESTEREY),,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,~ ____ __
(LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET, ,,,,,~ ___ __
(WIEDER). I I' I I I STANTON. I. I·~ ----
(AGRAN) •• I ••• I .VARDOULIS. I·~ -----(GREEN) •••••••• WAHNER •••••• ~ _____ __
0 I STRICT 11
(MAC ALLISTER>. BAILEY. I' I I·~ ----
{MAC ALLISTERLPATTINSON. I·~ ----
(WIEDER>. I ••• I .STANTON. I I'·~----
l/i7/84
{MAC A~LISTER),BAILEY, ,,.,.~
!ADLER) I I I •• I I I iROUfh I I I. I·~::== NELSON),, ,,,,,COOPER,,,,,,~
PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,, ·~ ---
(HOESTEREY),,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,. ---
{OLSON),,,,,,,,FINLAYSON ••• ~:::: {SEIDEL),,,,,,,FRESE,,,,.,,~
(RISNER),,,,,,,GRGAS,,,,,,,~---
{DAVIS),, ,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,,,, ---
(LUXEMBOURGERLGRISET, 11,, I --
{CRANK),,, ••••• HANSON ••• , •• ~ ---(MAURER),,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,,~::==
(KUZNI K). I I I I' I HOLT I I I I I.' •--Ml!!!!!:
!ODLUM) I. I I I I I. KAWANAM I' I'.~:::::: RELL)•t•••••••MARSHOTT,,,,~ __
PARTINJ,,,,,,,MULLEN,,,,,,~
(COOPER). I I I I I I NELSON I I I • I , -;;;;;r --
(MAC ALLI STER). PATTINSON,,·~ --
!CULVER). I I I. I. PERRY. It I''·~===
HEATHER).,, I •• PLUMMER ••• '·~ OVERHOLT),,, ,,ROTH,,,,,,,,~~--
!HOESTEREY),,,,SALTARELLI •• ~::::
BEYER). I 11 I I I .SMITH. I 11 I' I """' WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTQN,,,,,~ ~--
(SELVAGGI) I I I I I SYLVIA. I. I I·~--
(MAND IC) I I I. I I' THOMAS. I I' I I ---
(AGRAN),,,, •••• VARDOULIS •• I ::::::
(GREEN/SMITH). .WAHNER. I I. I·~--
(MURPHY) ••••••• WEDAA ••••••• ~
(HOLMBERG),,,,,WEDEL., ,,,.,~:::::
(CATLIN) I I' 11 •• WINTERS. 11. ·~--
STAFF:
OTHERS:
HARPER,,,,,, _____ __
SYLVESTER. I·----CLARKE •••••• ______ __
DAWES,,,,,,, ____ _
ANDERSON,,,, ____ _
BUTLER,,,,,, _____ __
BROWN,,,,,,, ____ _
BAKER,,,,,,, ______ __
KYLE,,••••••-----YOUNG,,,,,,, _____ __
WOODRUFF,,,, ___ ~--HOHENER,,, ,, _____ __
HOWARD,,,,., ______ __ HUNT,,,,,,,, _____ __
KEITH,,,,,,, ____ _
KNOPF,,,,,,, ______ _
LE BLANC. I I·----
LINDSTROM. I·----LYNCH ••••••• ___ __
MARTINSON. I·----PEARCE •••••• ____ _
February 8, 1984 Joint Meeting Notes
#7(a) -Report of the Joint Chairman
Chairman Holt reported that since November 29th there has been considerable
discussion with representatives of the City of Fountain Valley as to whether or
not the screen check review draft of the EIR/EIS document for Ultimate Sludge
Disposal prepared by our consultant is a public document. Also, is the City of
Fountain Valley a "responsible agency" in this matter? The City hired the legal
firm of Latham & Watkins and our legal counsel has determined that in this
/ particular instance, the City is a responsible agency. Said he believed the
matter has been resolved to the City's satisfaction since the Districts have
given the City a copy of the report.
/
Don Holt then advised that four Directors, including himself, attended the CASA
General Meeting in Indian Wells on January 26-28. The subjects discus sed were:
-Privatization and financing for the BO's
-The State Clean Water Program
-Major issues facing the State Water Resources Control Board
-Federal Construction Grants Program, and
-New legal liability threats in the 80 's
Speakers on these subjects were:
-A member of the State Water Resources Control Board
The Executive Director of the SWRCB
-The Director of the Office of Water Program Operation, EPA Washington,
-Plus numerous regular CASA member representatives and associates
There were also considerable discussions throughout the meeting concerning the
State Board Subchapter 15 revisions and State Department of Health Services
regulations pertaining to waste disposal to land. Vice Chairman Edgar added
that it appeared to him that some minimal input changed the term to "wa s te"
disposal. There doesn't seem to be any technical data to support why it was
changed.
The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
February 29th at 5:30 p .m. and invited Director s Dorothy Wedel and Duane Winters
../' to attend.
He also called the Directors' attention to a correction in the list of Executive
Committee Meeting dates on the back of the current meeting notice. The March
/"' meeting will be on March 28th not March 22nd, as indicated.
Mr. Holt then stated that as reported in the Executive Committee 's Report to the
Joint Boards, the 30l(h) waiver hearing scheduled for February 10, 1984, was
cancelled. He announced that Jim Anderson, the Executive Officer of the
Regional Board, was present and had graciously volunteered to be there to answer
/""'any questions the Directors had. He then introduced Jim Anderson who addressed
/' the Board. Mr. Anderson stated that he assumed the Directors wanted to know
why the hearing was cancelled. He said at the last hour when they were about to
publish the agenda for the Board meeting, they received substantive changes to
the monitoring program from EPA. Originally the State Board understood EPA's
program was on track with theirs. Unfortunately, the draft of the monitoring
program appeared within 10 days of the public hearing and it was such a
significant change that they felt it would be appropriate to allow the
Districts' and the State Board's staff to possibly negotiate some changes. He
, added that they only received one adverse comment to issuance of the Permit
which was from the National Wildlife Association in Washington, D.C. who
questioned some of the monitoring proposals. He said some of their points were
well taken and would be addressed in the new Permit. The hearing was removed
from the agenda subject to a 30-day notice. They hope possibly to put it back
for the next Board meeting in Orange County which is April 13th. Are planning
to discuss this with EPA on February 14th. Said they have been asked why don't
they just use EPA's monitoring? He indicated that that would mean two reports,
gathering information two times, would cost more and would require two people to
review . Monitoring must be cost-effective. The Porter-Cologne Act provides
that the need for monitoring must bear reasonable cost for monitoring. Hope to
justify any additional monitoring that is necessary. That is why they are
holding up permit.
Chairman Holt then thanked Jim Anderson for coming and explaining situation.
Mr. Anderson added that they would publish notice on March 13th for the
April 13th Board Meeting. Requires a 45-day notice per Federal Regulations, but
they have met those requirements before and have been told that they can just
continue the matter with a reasonable notice of 10 days. SWRCB felt they should
give 30-day's notice though. Holt asked how it looks for the 13th date and Jim
said he wasn't sure. They have sent analysis of new draft to EPA. Technicians
~will be in their office on Tuesday and will see if they have some good ideas of
how to monitor the effects of the discharge in the ocean. There are some things
that they want to do that the Regional Board considers to be on the research
level. Will look at monitoring of marine mammals. Will probably be included in
permit at some point and will discuss the reasons for it with EPA .
Mr. Anderson then commented with regard to the Newport Bay mussel watch program.
Said just so Directors are aware, they have 23 stations. This may be a plan for
the Districts to use in the open ocean but haven't figured out how to do it yet.
_,_........,....The report that came out that day was not that significant re finding PCB's and
/" toxic heavy metals. They expected that. The newspaper made it sound worse than
: it ·was. No need for health warnings. Don't have an identifiable source in the
Bay like we do in the ocean.
t7(b) -Report of the General Manager ~~AH reported that the he and the Assistant General Manager attended an AMSA ~ ~eeting in Denver. There were top EPA people at the meeting. Said it is
absolutely true that enforcement by Region IX EPA is here. It started back in
October when we got our 308(a) letter and our enforcement program is in place.
Whether agencies have received Federal funding or not, EPA will move ahead if
people are violating permits. We are presently without a permit but are
attempting to meet our 30l(h) waiver requirements. In January we changed our
operation to meet requirements and are going to have to change tomorrow again
because of odor problems. The staff is doing an excellent job in monitoring the
suspended solids numbers. Will give Directors another report on this later.
i7(c) -Report of the General Counsel
Director Holt introduced Suzanne Atkins, a associate of Tom Woodruff, who was
sitting in for him that night. She referred to the Memorandum mailed to the
Directors relative to the filing of a "Friends of the Court" Brief supporting
the position of Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts relative to public
employees' right to strike. LA County Sanitation Districts sought to enjoin
their employees from striking and were successful in court. The Employees Union
-2-
, ..
is seeking appeal . LA County has sought the support of other public agencies
and particularly sanitation agencies because they have a particular interest re
health and safety. She said it is the recommendation of their office that this
District in some way participate in an "amicus curiae" brief. At CASA they
voted to do this and the Districts could be a co-signer to that brief .
It was so moved and seconded.
Holt added that this matter came up before the Executive Board of CASA and
they discussed limiting the amount of money that could be spent on this .
75 hours were allocated for preparing this. Would encourage a yes vote on this.
Voice vote. Director Hanson voted in opposition to the motion. Motion
carried.
Re: Consent Calendar Item No. 9(1), Chairman Holt stated that he would like to
~licly commend Bill Clarke, Districts ' Superintendent, who is the incoming
~~~~sident of the California Water Pollution Control Association.
/
f 15 -Items considered in closed session
Chairman Holt called for a motion re Management and Department Head
compensation . It was moved and seconded to approve recommended changes
effective January 1, 1984 (adopt Resolution No . 84-22). I n lieu of increase
in salary , will pay 4.5% of employee's contribution to OCERS, and Benefits
increase re dental and medical of .60% for a total of 5.10%.
Perry asked that the motion be amended to include having the Executive Committee
look into the Deferred Compensation Plan that was set up some years ago re
whether we should add to it or revise it or what. Amended motion seconded.
Voice vote . Motion carried unanimously .
{Then had a voice vote on the original motion also and it carried. Don't think
// that was necessary though.)
123 -DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 EIR
{f) Director Bailey had a question on page 28 of the responses and asked if
there was a difference between "should " and "shall"? Said these items were
definite and thought it should state "shall".
Holt recognized Sandra Bauer from Michael Brandman & Associates, Districts'
consultant . She stated that Director Bailey was correct . These statements will
be changed to "shall". She briefly reported that projects in EIR are not
growth-inducing. Most adverse effects are short term during construction.
Major c·omments received--from Fish and Game and CRWQCB.
Bailey commented that the report was very well done and their responses were
good .
-3-
f 28 -DISTRICT 2 -Easement re Contract 2-14-1
(b) Suzanne Atkins reported on behalf of the General Counsel. She indicated
that the sewer was built in 1973, and was later discovered that there is not an
appropriate easement for this. This request is that the Board authorize the
Districts' engineer and General Counsel to negotiate with the owner of the
property on which the Districts' sewer is encroaching. The Districts' 'Deputy
Chief Engineer has met with the owner of this property and has reviewed the
value of the property and they are fairly certain this property is worth more
than what the owner is willing to settle on , which is approximately $95 ,000 .00.
She then called on Tom Dawes to review further . He explained that the Santa Ana
River Interceptor was built on the westerly side of 'the Santa Ana River and was
intended to be built within the Santa Ana River easements. However, its
easements do not allow the construction of anything except flood control
/
facilities. The property owner is building a large office complex. We believe
he will accept $95,000.00 and will sell us an appropriate easement for our
sewer. It is for approximately one acre. The land is valued at over $600,000
per acre. Generally speaking, easements go for about 1/3 of the value. Said
/
the offer that has been discussed appears to be in line.
Cooper asked, suppose it is a little too high, what does that do to his project?
TMD replied that he has received all the approvals and has already started
construction. Doesn't affect his project at all.
Roth asked if they were going to use this area for a parking lot and was told
yes. TMD said he thought we were getting off cheap .
It was moved and seconded to accept easement for $95,000.00 . Motion carried.
i29 -DISTRICTS 2 & 7 (District 13)
(d) It was stated that the boundaries will be co-terminus with non-inhabited
areas. Roth asked if all the respective cities had been advised about
these fees? FAH replied yes. He said he noticed that our corrununications go to
a depar tment rather than an elected official. Should be directed to elected
official rather than staff membe~s. Holt stated that it should probably go to
both the Mayor and City Manager or City Administrator. Agreed. Holt indicated
that the staff would adopt that policy in the future .
i32 -DISTRICT 7 (Irvine Business Complex)
/TMD reported that at the January Board the Directors authorized preparation of a
report on the Irvine Business Complex. It is a 2,500-acre area undergoing
tremendous changes from industrial to very heavy business office uses and 7-8
new hotels. We became aware of this in the last year and started looking at
some ways we could serve this new development. In December the Board approved a
new alignment of the Airport Relief Trunk Sewer. It provides new service which
reduces the burden on the system. However, we knew other new facilities would
be requ ired. Her referred to three new facilities identified in report . The
cost for construction of all these facilities is $1.3 million . There are
additional charges for design and contract administration. The staff is
reviewing this and is preparing a report to give to Directors at their next
meeting (on 2/15). Will be looking at the establishment of a special zone in
the business complex where we could have fees to cover the cost of additional
facilities to serve the area, in keeping with the Districts' long-standing
tradition of collecting fees to pay for facilities to serve development .
-4-
Director Edgar commented that when they approved the realignm~nt of the Main
Trunk Sewer, said one thing they did was increase the capacity of the pipe.
Asked if the analysis here reflected that or should the pipe be increased
another size? TMD stated that the analysis showed that we made the correct
choice with the .pipe size. Still have a little reserve. Conrad added that we
have a 40% increase in capacity based on current land use planning in Irvine and
Newport Beach and feel that is adequate.
vardoulis stated that most of what Directors' were look ing at there had already
been approved by the City of Irvine. If they go any further in increasing pipe
size, could be looking at considerable increase in density. He said they have a
separate study going on relative to the road system in Irvine. Added that if we
are looking for a special fee for connections, we should act swiftly and keep
fee to a minimum such as $.10/foot. No permits have been pulled yet except for
hotels. 5¢ -10¢ per square foot would cover our increased costs . Developers
are going to be charged a much stiffer fee for their road system.
Wahner asked how this will affect any future agreement with IRWD? TMD answered
that we have presented this report to IRWD and discussed it with them and they
and aware of what we are doing. The subtrunks that parallel the Airport Relief
Trunk have very little impact on IRWD.
vardoulis then asked how soon we could set a fee and if that was proposed for
the February 15th meeting? FAH replied that it was our intent to bring to
Directors a proposed Ordinance on the 15th. Are still holding discussions with
some of the property owners in the area. With regard to Von Karman Trunk, are
holding discussions with engineering staff of IRWD and may be bring to Directors
a proposal for some additional engineering to come up with two proposals for
bidding. One will be for a 39-inch sewer and one for a 60-inch sewer which
would provide capacity for IRWD. Would bid those two projects and IRWD would
pay the extra engineering to do that and we would be giving them a little more
time to ponder whether they could come here. Holt added that he thought it
would be appropriate to invite members of IRWD and The Irvine Company to the
meeting on February 15th.
ALL DISTRICTS (Other business ??)
Chairman Holt then requested that our General Counsel investigate legislation
relative to making the Directors' compensation for members of the Board of
Supervisors commensurate with the rest of the Directors on the Board.
7
-5-
"
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MElllNG
ON
FEBRUARY 8., 198lt
ADMINISTRATIVE. OFFICES
10844 ELLIS A VENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on February 8, 1984, at 7:30 p.m.,
;.n the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the
~11 was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 as follows:
DISTRICT NO. 1:
DISTRICT NO. 2:
DISTRICT NO. 3:
DISTRICT NO. 5:
• " DISTRICT NO. 6:
DISTRICT NO. 7:
~!STRICT NO. 11:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
x Robert Hanson, Chairman
x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tern
_x_Don Saltarelli
_x_Roger Stanton
_a_Henry Wedaa, Chairman
_x_Don Roth, Chairman pro tern
Barbara Brown
x Sam Cooper
x Dan Griset
_x_Donald Holt
_x_Carol Kawanami
x Bob Perry
-x-Don Smith
_x_Roger Stanton
_x_Dorothy Wedel
_x_Duane Winters
x Bruce Finlayson, Chairman
-x-Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tern
--Barbara Brown
x Norman Culver
_x_Henry Frese
...2.__Victor Grgas
x Don Griff in
x Dan Griset
-X--Frank Marshott
_x_Carrey Nelson
x Don Roth
_x_Roger Stanton
__ x_Charles Sylvia
x John A. Thomas
x Dorothy Wedel
--x-Duane Winters
x Evelyn Hart, Chairman
x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tern
__ x_Roger Stanton
x James Wahner, Chairman
x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tern
_x_Roger Stanton
x Don Smith, Chairman
-X--Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tern
-x-Richard Edgar
-x-Dan Griset
x Roger Stanton
-x-Bill Vardoulis
x. James Wahner
x Ruth Bailey, Chairman
x Ron Pattinson
__ x_Roger Stanton
-2-
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
Orma Crank
__ Robert Luxembourger
__ Ronald Hoesterey
__ Harriett Wieder
__ Todd Murphy
__ E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr.
__ x_Marvin P. Adler
Carrey Nelson
Robert Luxembourger
___ Robert Kuznik
___ William Odlum
___ Norman Culver
Gene Beyer
Harriett Wieder
__ John Holmberg
__ Buck Catlin
Richard Olson
---Richard Partin
x Marvin P. Adler
__ Bob Perry
Norma Seidel
Joyce Risner
__ Jesse Davis
Robert Luxembourger
Charles J. Rell
__ Sam Cooper
E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr.
Harriett Wieder
__ Anthony R. Selvaggi
__ Robert P. Mandie, Jr.
__ John Holmberg
__ Buck Catlin
__ Philip Maurer
__ Jacqueline Heather
___ Harriett Wieder
__ Steven Smith
Philip Maurer
Harriett Wieder
___ Gene Beyer
___ Philip Maurer
Ronald Hoesterey
Robert Luxembourger
__ Harriett Wieder
__ Larry Agran
__ Harry Green
__ Don MacAllister
__ Don MacAllister
__ Harriett Wieder
2/08/84
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
i5
ALL DISTRICTS
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Assistant General Manager,
William H. Butler, Secretary, Tom Dawes,
Bill Clarke, Blake Anderson, Rita Brown,
Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Bob
Ooten
Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel, Conrad
Hohener, Walt Roward, Milo Keith, Mike
Le Blanc, Sat Tamarabuchi, Jim Anderson,
Sandra Bauer
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the Board of
Supervisors re appointment of Directors and
seating new members of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed,
as follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 Roger R. Stanton Harriett M. Wieder
DISTRICT l There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
ordered that said
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
ordered that said
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
ordered that said
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
ordered that said
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
ordered that said
minutes be deemed
minutes be deemed
minutes be deemed
minutes be deemed
minutes be deemed
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or amendments
to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
approved, as mailed.
-3-
--------a·----·------·----------·--··-----·--.---:----------------------·------
....
--
-;
2/08/84
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 11, 1984, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman advised that the
Report of the Joint Chairman Districts had recently provided a copy
of the screen check review draft of the
Districts' ultimate solids disposal project EIS/EIR document to the City of
Fountain Valley in accordance with their request. Chairman Holt reported that the
City, which was deemed a responsible agency by the General Counsel, was satisfied
that the Districts had given them an opportunity to review the document, and
indicated that he believed this matter was now fully resolved.
Joint Chairman Holt then reported on the recent CASA General Meeting, held in
Indian Wells on January 26-28, which he and four other Directors attended.
Speakers included officials from the State Water Resources Control Board and EPA.
Issues discussed at the conference included:
-Privatization and financing
-The State Clean Water program
-Major issues facing the State Water Resources Control Board
-The Federal Construction Grants program
-New legal liability developments
The Joint Chairman also reported that there were several discussions throughout
the Conference regarding the State Water Resources Control Board and State
Department of Health Services proposed regulations pertaining to waste disposal
at landfills.
Mr. Holt stated that as indicated in the Executive Committee's report to the
Joint Boards, EPA Region IX and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board had cancelled the Districts' 30l(h) waiver hearing scheduled for February
10, 1984. He then introduced Mr. James Anderson, Executive Officer of the
Regional Board, who explained the reasons for cancellation.
Mr. Anderson advised the Directors that ten days before the date of the hearing,
EPA Region IX issued a draft of the ocean monitoring program they intended to
require the Districts to carry out to comply with the waiver. Since this draft
program was significantly different than the program contained in the Regional
Board's draft permit, Mr. Anderson felt it was appropriate to postpone the
hearing to allow the EPA, the Regional Board and the Districts some additional
time to review and consider modifications to the EPA's proposed program. He
indicated that the EPA program would be very expensive for the Districts to carry
out, and advised the Directors that since the Porter-Cologne Act requires that
monitoring programs must be cost-effective, he and his staff had scheduled
meetings with the EPA staff within the next week to discuss their proposed
program.
Mr. Anderson advised that the National Wildlife Federation had made some formal
comments to his agency regarding the Districts' permit application. He reported
that their comments as well as the ocean monitoring program would be addressed in
-4-
2/08/84
the new permit. April 13, 1984, is the date to which the hearing had been
rescheduled at this time.
Chairman Holt then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, I.._.}
February 29, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Wedel and Winters to attend and
participate in the discussions. He also pointed out an error on the February
meeting notice regarding the Executive Committee meeting in March, 1984, and
advised that March 28 was the correct date for the meeting rather than March 22
as published in the notice.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
The General Manager reported on the
items discussed at the AMSA Winter
Conference he and the Assistant General
Manager attended in Denver, Colorado in early February. Mr. Harper reported that
top EPA officials spoke at the conference, and advised that EPA officials at all
levels would be actively enforcing permit violations whether or not agencies had
received Federal funding for upgrading their facilities.
Mr. Harper reported that the Districts are currently operating without a permit ·•
pending issuance of the proposed 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit, but we are
attempting to meet the 30l(h) waiver requirements at this time. He indicated
that the Districts are now meeting the suspended solids limits following
operational changes we made in January, and will be taking additional steps to
mitigate odors associated with the increased dewatering activities to comply with
the proposed limitations. Mr. Harper advised that the staff will report to the
Directors again in the near future regarding our permit requirements.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Counsel
in for the General Counsel.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing the General Counsel to
file an amicus curae brief in
support of County Sanitation
District No. 2 of Los Angeles
county
Joint Chairman Holt introduced Ms.
Suzanne Atkins, a staff attorney from
Mr. Woodruff's office, who was filling
Ms. Atkins called the Directors'
attention to an amicus curae (friend
of the court) brief mailed with the
agenda material supporting the
position of.the Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts (LACSD)
relative to public employees' right
to strike. She described the action and LACSD's request to join, and
advised that the CASA Executive Committee voted to support LACSD. Following
a brief report by the Joint Chairman it was:
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the filing of the "Friend of the Court" brief with the California
Supreme Court re County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County as
recommended by the General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized.
Director Hanson requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made
a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages "A" \..I
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below,
be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
-s-
·•
2/08/84
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self-Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRicr NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re
Job No. PW-107
1/11/84
$314,830.09
80,701.11
62,679.28
3,487.47
78,278.20
18,001.27
67,409.62
19.70
30,903.64
6,149.56
816.73
2,981. 21
$666,257.88
1/25/84
$219,204.20
267,618.48
67,360.05
4,861.61
767.50
9,355.66
14,091.36
4,885.99
188.10
5,492.35
6,716.28
2,773.55
17.02
$603,332.15
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Safety Platforms at
Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-107, granting a time extension of 42 calendar days to the
contract with Belmont Engineering due to District-caused delays at the job site,
be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. PW-107 as
complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-12, accepting
Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107,
as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. PW-108 as
complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-13, accepting
Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. PW-118
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-14, approving
plans and specifications for Installation of Four (4) pH and Four (4) Conductivity
Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-118,
authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
-6-
2/08/34
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and soecif ications
re Job No. PW-121 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-15, approving ~
plans and specifications for Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. PW-121, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt
of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding purchase of Six (6) ~-Ton
Pickup Trucks, Specification
No. A-116
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and award purchase of
six (6) ~-Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-116, to GMC Truck & Coach in the
total amount of $45,900.12 including tax.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding purchase of One (1)
4-Wheel Drive Jeep, Specification
No. A-117
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and award purchase of
One (1) 4-Wheel Drive Jeep, Specification No. A-117, to Brian Chuchua•s Jeep, Inc.
in the amount of $8,904.00 including tax.
ALL DISTRicrs Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding purchase of One (1) 2-Ton
Flat Bed Truck, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby
No. A-118 receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and award purchase of ~
One (1) 2-Ton Flat Bed Truck, Specification No. A-118, to GMC Truck & Coach in the
amount of $14,860.14 including tax.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding purchase of 3/4-Ton Cab &
Chassis with Utility Type Service
Body, Specification No. A-119
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation to reject the low bid of
Theodore Robins Ford as it did not meet the engine specifications.
FURTHER t-DVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby award purchase of 3/4-Ton Cab
& Chassis with Utility Type Service Body,·specification No. A-119, to Jerry
Goodwin Dodge, the second low bidder, in the amount of $11,443.76 including tax.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to negotiate and
issue a purchase order to Wyss,
Inc., for purchase of 1300 Wyss
Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble
Diffusers, Specification No. E-144
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
authorize the staff to negotiate and
issue a purchase order to Wyss, Inc.,
c/o Bessen & Associates, in an amount
not to exceed $41,000.00 plus tax and
freight, for purchase of 1300 Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers,
Specification No. E-144, for evaluation of improved suspended solids and BOD
removal efficiencies in a portion of the secondary treatment facilities at Plant
No. l.
-7-
2/08/84
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to negotiate and
issue a purchase order to Romac
Supply Company for Purchase of
Three (3) 2000 KVA Standby
Transformers, Specification
No. E-145
Transformers, Specification No.
station located at Plant No. 2.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding purchase of Influent
Magnetic Replacement Flow Meters,
Specification No. E-142, to
Ponton Industries, Inc.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
authorize the staff to negotiate and
issue a purchase order to Romac Supply
Company for an amount not to exceed
$45,000.00 plus tax and freight, for
Purchase of Three (3) 2000 KVA Standby
E-145, for use at the Foster Outfall Pumping
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and award purchase of
Influent Magnetic Replacement Flow
Meters, Specification No.
$119,022.00, plus tax and
E-142, to Ponton Industries, Inc. in the total amount of
delivery, as follows:
DISTRICT(S) TRUNK LINE BID AMOUNT TOTAL SHARE OF COST
1 Talbert $12,520 1 -$12,520.00
2 Santa Ana River 17,880 2 -17,880.00
3, 11 & Joint Interplant 21,194 ( 3 -4,662.68
( 11 -847.76
(Joint -15,683.56
3 Miller-Holder 21,194 3 -21,194.00
3 Bushard 21,194 3 -21,194.00
5 & 6 A & B Trunk 12,520 (5 -3,130.00
(6 -9,390.00
6 & 7 Airbase 12,520 (6 -11,894.00
(7 -626.00
TOTAL $119,022 $119i;022.00
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing William N. Clarke,
Districts' Superintendent, to
attend meetings and conferences
within the State of California
The Joint Chairman commended William N.
Clarke, Districts' Superintendent, upon
his selection as President-elect of the
California Water Pollution Control
Association.
as President-elect of CWPCA and
during his term as President
through May, 1985
It was then moved, seconded and duly
carried:
That William N. Clarke, Districts' Superintendent, be, and is hereby, authorized
to attend meetings and conferences within the State of California during the
remainder of his term as President-elect of the California Water Pollution Control
Association (CWPCA) and during his term as President through May 1985, with the
approval of the General Manager~ and,
-8-
2/08/84
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing Districts' Superinten-
dent, William N. Clarke, to attend
the water Pollution Control Federa-
tion Region 8 conference in Reno,
Nevada on February 23 & 24, 1984
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Districts' Superintendent, William
N. Clarke, be, and is hereby, authorized
to attend the Water Pollution Control
Federation Region 8 conference in Reno,
Nevada, on February 23 & 24, 19841 and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file letter 'dated
January 11, 1984, from the City of That the letter dated January 11, 1984,
CyPress from the City of Cypress supporting the
City of Fountain Valley in their ·•
opposition to construction of sludge disposal facilities in the City of Fountain
Valley, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file written report of
the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive
Committee's meeting on January 25, 1984,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to issue Requests
for Proposals (RFP's) for Odor
Containment/Treatment Facilities
and Operating Procedures Study
Operating Procedures Study.
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in closed session re
personnel matters
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving management and department
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
authorize the staff to issue Requests
for Proposals (RFP's) for Odor
Containment/Treatment Facilities and
Motion to convene in closed session to
meet with management representatives
pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6 at 8:02 p.m.
At 8:10 p.m., the Boards reconvened in
regular session.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
head compensation adjustments That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-22, approving
management and department head compensation adjustments effective January 1, 1984.
FURTHER MOVED: That the Executive Committee be, and is hereby, directed to
review the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan to consider possible additions
or revisions to the Plan.
-9-
.,
2/08/84
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. PW-123 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-20, approving
plans and specifications for Piping for Return Sludge Chlorination at Plant No. 2
Secondary Settling Basins, Job No. PW-123, to improve the settling of solids, and
authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award a contract to the low
bidder in an amount not to exceed $80,000.00 A certified copy of this resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to proceed on a
force account basis to Modify One
Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Unit
at Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment
Facilities, Job No. PW-124
solids capture, at a cost not to
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
to proceed on a force account basis to
Modify One Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF)
Unit at Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment
Facilities, Job No. PW-124, to improve
exceed $18,000.00.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., February 8, 1984.
DISTRICT 5
ApProving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications re
Contract No. S-18R (Rebid)
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation and
Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway
sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. S-18R (Rebid),
authorizing an addition of $9,988.00 to the contract with Russco Construction,
Inc. for installation of additional mechanical pipe supports and thrust blocks and
additional work required due to the incorrect location of the existing force main
on the Cal Trans as-built plans, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days
for said additional work and inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. A
copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., February 8, 1984.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:16 p.m., February 8, 1984.
DISTRICT 3
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re
Contract No. 3-21-2R
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby
approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Trench Reconstruction,
Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-2R, making miscellaneous technical
clarifications. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the
Secretary of the Boards.
-10-
2/08/84
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding contract for Contract
No. 3-21-2R That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 84-18-3, to \.)
receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-2R, to Richardson
& Le Bouef Company in the amount of $213,699.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11
Receive and file Staff Report
summarizing the Final EIR on the
Master Plan of Sewage Collection
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report summarizing the
Final EIR on the Master Plan of Sewage
Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and
11, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11
Verbal Report by EIR Consultant
Ms. Sandra Bauer of Michael Brandman and
Associates made a brief report regarding
the EIR, and advised that the projects
reviewed in the EIR were growth-accommodating rather than growth-inducing. Ms.
Bauer indicated that the only adverse effects of the projects were short-term in
nature, were related to sewer construction activities, and would be mitigated.
She also acknowledged a suggestion by Director Bailey to change the word "should"
to "shall" on page 28 of the report and stated that the changes would be made as
recommended.
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file written comments
re Draft EIR That the written comments received after
public hearing on November 9, 1983, re
Draft EIR, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11
Receive, file and aporove Final
EIR on the Master Plan of Sewage
Collection for Districts Nos. 2,
3 & 11
filed and approved; and,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Final Environmental Impact
Report on the Master Plan of Sewage
Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and
11 be, and is hereby, received, ordered
FURTHER MOVED: That said Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the
State and District guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and is hereby certified.
DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11
Certifying Final Environmental
Impact Report on the Master Plan
of Sewage Collection
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-17, certifying
Final Environmental Impact Report on the
Master Plan of Sewage Collection for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, making certain
findings in connection therewith, and adopting a statement of overriding
considerations. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
-11-
..
.;
2/08/84
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman declared
this meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., February 8, 1984.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., February 8, 1984.
DISTRICT 2
Receive and file Staff Report re
negotiations for acquisition of an
easement over the Santa Ana River
Interceptor Sewer, Contract
No. 2-14-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report relative to
negotiations for the acquisition of an
easement over the Santa Ana River
Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1,
in the vicinity between Garden Grove
Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
DISTRICT 2 Ms. Suzanne Atkins reported that the
Verbal Report of General Counsel Districts had recently discovered that
the Santa Ana River Interceptor, which
was built in 1973, does not have an appropriate easement in the.vicinity between
Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway. While the interceptor was
intended to be built within existing Santa Ana River flood control easement, the
property owner identified the problem when seeking permits to construct a large
office complex and parking facilities in the vicinity of the interceptor.
The Deputy Chief Engineer and General Counsel had met with the owner to review
the estimated value of the easement, and have received a proposal from the
property owner to sell the Districts an appropriate easement for $95,000, which,
in their determination, is less than one-third of the $600,000 approximate value
of the one-acre parcel.
Ms. Atkins recommended that the Board authorize the General Counsel and the
Deputy Chief Engineer to negotiate with the property owner to purchase the
easement for a price not to exceed $95,000.00, as the price acceptable to the
owner appears fair and reasonable.
Following a brief discussion among the Directors regarding the value of the
property and the limited effect of the easement on the property owner, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Counsel and Deputy Chief Engineer be, and are hereby, authorized
to negotiate for and acquire an appropriate easement for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor in the vicinity between Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove
Freeway for an amount not to exceed $95,000.00.
DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Following a clarification that the
Receive and file interim report proposed modified District No. 13
of the District 13 Steering boundary include only presently
Committee uninhabited areas within the new
District, and the notification to the
cities regarding the proposed fees in District No. 13, it was moved, seconded and
duly carried:
-12-
2/08/34
That the interim report of the District No. 13 Steering Committee dated January
30, 1984, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 2 & 7
Approving modification of the
boundary of proposed District
No. 13
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Tht the modification of the boundary of
proposed District No. 13 to exclude
developed territory as recommended by
the District No.
1984, be, and is
13 Steering Committee in its interim report dated January 30,
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 2 & 7
Approving proposed Orange County
Reorganization No. 65 -Formation
of County Sanitation District
No. 13 and Reorganization of
County Sanitation Districts Nos.
2 and 7
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 84-16, approving
proposed Orange County Reorganization
No. 65 -Formation of County Sanitation
District No. 13 and Reorganization of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7,
and directing that a proposal therefor be filed with the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County. A certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering annexation of 5.266 acres
of territory to the District re That the Board of Directors hereby
Annexation No. 54 -Tract No. 10523 adopts Resolution No. 84-21-2, ordering
Annexation · annexation of 5.266 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity south of
the intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Sycamore Circle in the city of Villa ~
Park, proposed Annexation No. 54 -Tract No. 10523 to County Sanitation District
No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 P..m., February 8, 1984.
DISTRICT 7
Ordering annexation of .67 acres
of territory to the District re
Annexation No. 119 -Roberts
Annexation
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 84-19-7, ordering
annexation of .67 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of
Highcliff Drive and Newport Boulevard in unincorporated County territory, proposed
Annexation No. 119 -Roberts Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRicr 7 The Deputy Chief Engineer reported that
Receive and file engineer's report at the January, 1984 Board meeting, the
on sewerage facility reguirements Boards engaged Boyle Engineering
for the expanding development in Corporation to prepare a report on
the Irvine Business Complex area additional sewerage facilities required \wJ
to serve the rapidly expanding Irvine
Business Complex area. The consultant has submitted the report which was mailed
to the Directors with the agenda.
-13-
·i
2/08/84
Mr. Dawes sununari~ed the report which identifies major changes in .development
patterns and densities in this 2,500 acre area that began last year. The Deputy
Chief Engineer advised that in addition to the new aHgnment of the Airport
Relief Trunk Sewer to Von Karmen approved by the Board in December, 1983, more
facilities will be needed to serve the Complex, and reported that the staff was
presently reviewing three new facilities proposed in the consultant's report. He
indicated that the construction cost estimates for these proposed new facilities
totaled approximately $1.3 million, and additional engineering costs would also
be incurred. He further advised that the staff was considering recommending
establishment of a special zone in this area in which connection fees would be
set in an amount to recover the cost of the additional facilities necessary to
serve the new development. This approach is consistent with the District's
long-standing policy of collecting connection fees from new development to pay
for facilities required to serve it.
The Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion regarding sizing of the
lines serving the Complex, the levels of development already approved by the City
of Irvine, the anticipated amounts of the proposed fees, and the ability of the
proposed facilities to provide service to IRWD should they decide to form
District No. 14. The General Manager advised the Directors that a detailed staff
report and a proposed draft urgency ordinance setting a fee for this zone would
be presented for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting of the
District tentatively scheduled for February 15.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Irvine Business Complex sewerage facilities study submitted by Boyle
Engineering Corporation dated February 1, 1984, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed, and referred to Directors and staff for study and consideration at
an adjourned meeting to be held February 15, 1984.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m.
Wednesday, February 15, 1984, at the Districts' administrative offices. The
Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., February 8, 1984.
Secretary, Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11
-14-
:: > I
~ ...
r ur-;o NC
\.Ill 1rn -"'·1 r r-•r.
llf 716'5
(; t-7 I flf·
r:,: ·1 u11
1; f 7 J ff·
... f: I 11· ~'
,) £.I j ::1:
(of. 7 \ ~:)
('f 7 j ':i£
l~(.71°~.
~·t·7lr'>4
I ( 7) n:;
i.;f. 7 1 ~·&
:~ e. 7) r, 7
C67l';IP
l~f. 71 <1C:
, ( 7 :--:.i;
t"f I~ 1.!l
i·e ·; ~ "c>
-:'f 7 ~ !j 3
rl: 7 <.'lllf
::n;c5
.· (-. 7 ~ ,";f
I ( ] ;-: 7
;1(. 7 c ,·,;:
t6721lC:
(;f7210
flf7t-'11
(. t 7; 1 ;-
·,'" ., < 1 ~
(: 6 ., ~ J q
Of. I 2 l ~
(16 'Ulf.
(1(. 7;>11
\· i I ! ,.
~: i ., l ':
[: ( 7 ~-(:
{If., ;: 1
,1 ( ..• , ;1 '-::-
(1f 7;:.;.. ~
,., .. 7? ~''•
1• f f .~I
' !· 1 ;: f
(1f. 7 ;· 7
l• t I ;; t·
flj:. ., ?Co
,; ! 7 ";-.' .~
c·
IJ)t,t; -.IT OJSl WCRKJNC· Cl.fJTAL rr;OClSSJNG OAH l/C•f·/ft4 PA~(
PF f'OR T NUP.B[ P Af· '' 3
COUNTY SANITAllON OJSTRICTS OF OkA~6[ rnuNTY
VENl.'•0~
~-A&O fLfCTRONJC~ SAL[~
All( LU~l:!EP roRr.
.II Jr' C A lJ F OHd A
ATP rRr~UCTS K CHE~lCAl~t •~r.
LJr{ l'POVl1CT~· It C.t•[MJCAI s,rr.•c •
~LLl(O SUFPLY CO.
AMEkJCA~ ~ClfNTJFIC PPGOUCTS
A~AH[J~ SfW£n CP~SlRUCTJON
T~r ANCHOR FfCKIN~ CO.
t. r, L• r. H [Ill c rt-r' •
t~~OW-P.ISCO, INC.
&AK(~ ~LY~tOP CO., INC.
PANK OF A~E~JC~ ~T & ~~
t:ECKMAN INSH~···rNT~
~ [l L PI PF ll S"i) d I. Y r (\ •
rtvcr
fl~ enr PCNl~L re.
~IR~l~6~~~ DfVlLCFrfNT
~o~·s AIR CONOlllONING
HU[NA FARK LUMPER ~ ~A~O~tRf
TH~ AUF~f COMP/IMY
L· U fl k [ f I\ G I I\ E l R I ~ G C C: •
l' u c: I r .. [ ~ ~ f" L "L I ~ .. r ,, ~ I N r •
r u 1 L rn r I. v HOP~'. t. f\; T r 0.
C i F FfCOWOJlJONING CO.
CS fOMFANY
C/.LJF. ~~~f.,.1/\TIC·I\ C:F PUHJC
Cf.LnL vn I c \ L~1VI I'. C:H (TY
c !I R r·· fr.: I l Ii F r r. lJ T F' 11 r I< ~: ~ u ~. • I t.
JOllN CASON
(llfVi\ON u.s.11., INC.
C: tfl C ~ H ". [ F I SH f M~ .~
P.~. CLAFF ro •• J~r.
CLAPI( r Yr I f·H1l.:l1n
C 0 "' I' l1 T ! I~ lJ [ C (" •
CO~N[Ll C~fVROl[l
ro~~OLICAJ(t [lfCT~ICAL Dl~T.
CONTJN[~l/ll AJF TOOLS, INC.
cor..111Ht\Tt.l (Hfr"JC.llL Cf.
f 11 U I• 1 Y II 1< fl /I~::· CH I J. l f ; f
r l·'f • I UC.
e1 .. .r;,c.~ r oRr.
r.rro
i.'l:LPH SYSTl.f.S, Jr',('.
ti 6 I 1 fl l f 1: l 11 I· M ~ II.I 1 f r1 1> P •
1; I ' . .1'0~· /.!'l I. \~fie-, 1 r ~-Y~ Jr t"') • I :-•f •
CLllJMS PAIP Ql/ll/R4
Ar~ouN 1
S~r;.51
.f'tt9B6.~'J
$ J 7 ~. '? [!
1H4 il. •; f~
1·'lfl9 •. ~P.
$H25.l!:i
S261f.0(1
$'1,250.00
f.lt~'it.R~
1?.H,.Hft.76
1·3b5.4CI
$~q3.11
S-lt13'1.£::!
c
s 1 •. ~:r 9. 7'~
'f.21f. ~,,
i·ntt.•if
11 t275.0!' ,. ,, 1.,. t Cj
~1.n.co
'J.86't.71
~·24~·1'•
1.42'•·~''
127'•·'•(1
S.163•22
:J6''.dl. 0 0
,.5 .. 1.21
·: 1 ',.fl l1
'i,Qt1. Pf
s1,r.1-;;.4c;-
$~B!'-.A~
'l~t~'l8.l'J3
S.~2.!)0
'll05.P9
;. 1-: 1 • 1 .!·
" .' 1 l • C'l r~
$1,276 •. ~'I
$f.,~pq.5f.
'j.2.19r:.21i
'l""•'•l~.r:o
'i i1 1 ~. 1 0
.i '''• 11. 1 ~
11•74(;.?~;
'i·~!in .It 1
1f. 5 •(JO
, ;: ~,. 1 !"·
:i ') t. ': • _; I
O[!:•flilPl JUN
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
LUMBER .
AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS
SPEC I Al TY GASES
WELO~NG SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
!.,AB SUPPLIES
CSOOC #I I REPAIRS
PUMP PARTS
CHEMICAL COAGULENTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SHALL HARDWARE
TRAVEL EXPENSES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PI PE SUPPL! ES
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
TRASH DISPOSAL
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
TRUCK REPAIRS
l1Jt10ER
PIPE SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
PUHP REPAIRS
VALVES
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
SAFET\' SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
ENGINE PARTS
ENGINE Oil
LAO SPECIMENS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SHALL HARDWARE
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
CHLORINE
PLAN CHECK OV£R-OEPOSIT
ENG IHE PARTS
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
. . (' "
I• •I
~
I
tv
:::
(
r llM.= r .. c
\.iARIHl\l 1'.f:.
Of· 7 2 !> J
e~7:>3?
:'.f.n?..~
(, f 7;: -~ 11
,. E 7 ;-11:
(. (> 7 ;-: ?.(-,
fl,1?~7
~f 7~ ~··
[.f, 7 2 ~<:
i.': 7< 4 (
r.;., 7; 111
:: (, I~~ 4 ;•
I;{; 7? 11,':
(\f 1? I. 1•
j. f 7 ;111 "J
i ( ., .-t; ~
r,. 7:•111
l f; Vi 4t'.
(, (, 7 ~ 4 °
Li:,·;<:. f1
i. r. 7 ~~" l
ff: 7 ".: ~ .. ;;·
i• (: 7;: ~ I
~ f .• , £ ~···
(l(J 7 ;· !.~.
I)(· 7 :~ !: {,
(),; 7 ;• ~· .,
t; f· 7;; !. H
.: (: 7 ~ ~ c.
:.f ·1.'( l,i
[f. '/;'lfl
fif:.7::>(:2
~ ( 7 ';' (· '!,
: ~-7 :-f-If
~ ( I; i :.
i.it 7; H
•!(. 7 ;:of. 7
t t· 7;'f.H
11( 7 ~· (-.·~
'· '-I;· 71:
Ii! i; i}
1:6 7 ;:i 7;:
i\f 7:>7i
l'( 7'27'1
:: f 7 :· .,!"--
~I I:• I'
( (
GJ~q -JT tJSl WC~Kl~~ C~~ IT~l F~UC[SSIN6 U~lf 1/u~/H4 f/IGf
Rr POR 1 NUMrfR flf''l ~
~
rouNTY Sl'MJHTION DISTfllC1$ or OR/lf!J(j[ COUNTY
V[ Ni.•rr.
OOllGLAs-r.1rn1..1. 11\VJNr
DUNN ru~APDS COPF.
rMCO
111<;p:tt\, nr.
1tirqu11r-. r1r·1 ~ :::t•r11.v
F f: r: U\l. l f H H Sf~ ( (, IH •
FllflR SUFFLY en.
Fl$f.ll[P. f. PORTfP CC.
CITY or fClNTAI~ VtLLrY
fl\(':-;1 rt\rlt\i:fRl .. !C ~t:HVICf~ tc.
(.f I:~-~ ... L r lf c 1 i' Ir ~-ll r H y
Gt. I~ r H lil r E L fF tl c N l (. fl •
llt.:RT Z Cllf' lf.JISJf\:G
PlJLON 1~r.rc:Es
A.s. HU~Hrs co., JN(.
r•Otir·.rv t·Ul\T ro.
Fl.JP LC y r.U c TF.or; 1 cs' I t•r.
liY!1PCTfll
1 SC 0 Cr. fl P H; Y
t~r[Plfl ~E~T C~f~lCAL CC.
trmun ~ 1 t.L rP orr :;c:;
IN 11, llf.
iiHf.HOX /d-'.£ PI Ci•
Tlif IRVIJH r.c.
JRVl~E INCLSTPJAL C:CMFL[~
1 IW I ~ E fH NC Ii WA H P P. I ~ T R I C T
,JlJL 1 AN C'(lt\-~TRUCT J r.t1
1-: ri ~-~.:Ar I TY r Pc f' lJ r: T ~·
k:r~-K~T flrFt~IV[ rr.
I'; ( d~ A fl: I I F [ S. S lH F t Y f. 0 •
KEITH & l1SSOClllH~
~lNG ~fA~JNG, INC.
Kll!~T f.l:~P f. Mt.CHIM l.lf11\k~·
I( LI. u~ -L !fl: L c 11P. r
lltf KCLL rrti:F/li\"r
L • r: • 1o1 • ~ •• , I r·. C •
w.r. L~ ro~cE ro.
L!lur:scr: COLOR L/.I'
trr~rr-~ 111:1r.t-1c; ctv.
L I r. r" 1 P. c i 1 ::-Hc 1 i L rr~ ;• ~. TIH •
LI·: flt.'fJL£•. n·u·rut re.
l fl' ... h ) i. A f ~:".CI: I t 1 i ~.
MAPVAC 'LErlFO~ll~
l_.t,Jl -<:t 1 LCll, Jr·.!f.
I-'. r ,, ... t"' -I· I l 1 r 11 1' I. I (' t. 1 I (i Ii! c:. r r. •
l·'C"! ,••:1 t•1 -i:1.:::-;.111·1. v 1r.
fLiJ~S PAI~ nttll/A4
A'·'. ·1UN 1
s1.1~.3.f..O
1.1~3.12
'f.lt~H.'i3
'f. J ' 'q 1 • C:('
t'tl.f;,{
j,lf 5. () 0
'$41.')7
1109.5;!
17~'1.112
1.1~B.1 9
1 )9'1.}tl
... ~ l •1 .30
1.3;'17.5~
1.1,:.;34.qt1
115 '..Of.
1h.1 1 4 •. J e.
,, p 7. 2C
i2,•,141.24
15H .58
J.3.7:>6.42
:f.1' ~,,;?.JI'
H•J7.4P
:f.!t~jft7e'i4
s.1.r,2:>.:11
!llt~RU.'I~
1. ~. !Hi
$) ,f,!)f;.li]
l~H.tl
~1112.1~
3. I , if, 'l • !J 'I
$ 11 • ilf'l 0 • fj 0
~ r, 1 1 • f! 5
-: •lf,(.. Clf.
I I '1. ,r, l·
1 ; • .,,, 1 • Hf-
·; "2 11. 1 If
'i }'; :~. q4
: 'ill • 1 .. ,
~. 1 , I '-~1 • H , ....
: l I ~-. ~ ~;
'I ) I I I·: 11 • 4 f,
'i I• Ii.,, ) ;1. ;J '.'·
l'I <.f • r f:
·1.;' • I 1 'i • :r,r.
~ •..•••• l i:
I 11• i •. '· 1•
0l'Sf!·l~ll 1HJ
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
PAINT SUPPLIES
ENGINE PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
DELIVERY SERVICE
ENGINE PARTS
PIPE SUPPLIES
WATER USEAGE
VALVES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
VEHICLE LEASE
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
PAINT SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ENGINE OIL
BATTERIES
rERR IC CHLORIDE
TOOL REPAIRS
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, TANK RENTAL
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
WATER USEAGE
PLAN CHECK OVER-DfPOSIT
SAFETY SUPPLIES
TOOLS
PIPE SUPPLIES
PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF LOS ALAMITOS TRENCH REPAIRS
DEARING SUPPLIES
PUMP PARTS
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
WELDING SUPPLIES
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
FILH PROCESSING
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
(LECTRICAL SUPPLIES
llERBICIOES
ENGR. 2-23, 2-10-IA, 2-25, 3-24-1, 3-211-2, 3-75
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
SLUDGE RFP ADVERTISEMENT
SHALL HARDWARE
fllNL H
W' rir; r.r~T r;o.
{:67?77
l"'f· 1211'
I!(-7;> 7-:i
'~ f I;: !: :;
:· f ·1 ~ ;: I
J { , : J ;•
fr 7;,i~<·
[; (· 1 ;,· J· q
'! (. 1:-' P!.
I.( 7:'H
( i 1 ;· ,, 7
; (;. 1::1<1'
(, f., 7 ;'·~C
tH 7~'0 £i
"f. J:><; 1
:. f. 7 ~· ... 'l
~ '.,f·. 7:: c3
'.:'> f( J;>";.11
I or-nc:: ~ :)f 7 ~· Clf> ::: r.1-7'?'~7
,1 f 1; c. ,.
i; f ·1 ;: "r
!.1-. / 31; 1:
rt=.1~r11
Cn ·13f:2
r:f. 1 :1 u:.
i f, 1 .7 r· ,,
:: .. 7 ., l '.1
,, f ·; .~ ~ ,.
re 7 I (:7
f:l: 1~0
{ f 7 .{ i: C;
'I 'I:' ll•
!°' L' 11
! (, 7 -~ 1 :•
~·f:-. 7 ~ 13
C.f.7~1'•
(\ (, '/ ,'. l :,
'• i· I:• l ~
., ( 1 ' 1 7
~ E 1 ;~ l H
ll(-731~,
( ,, 7 32 IJ
o,.n:-1
~ < 1 Y':-'
('
cqr;•? -Jl l;ISl 1.iCl1kHfr. Ct.J·JTAL J:FOCES51Nf; (IAff.: l/:,r,/fi" J.-'ftl,f
P f.f ORT F·JUMBU> /IJ''' 3
CPUNTY ~tNITATION DISTRICTS OF o~•NfE rou~TY
V[ t:I ClR
~l~L/IN[ V/lLVf & LtUE[
LfO~G[ ~lllfP CG~SlPUCTlGN
Mff·•F )l'.fflY U'fl lflffff C. r.o.
~·I ~ .. r r.
t' I~ r c1
f .• i. P.Ct!J J t'. FGLWIJJ.''r
MYtO u:r;un1n ES
f)'fHS TJR[ surrLY
Nrt~ON 11pos. CC.N~TJ:l1fT)Of\i
(I TY or ~[.\,;J'Of<l I f/.[lf
1111. r.t1f!t.r.1 C:C1R!·
tLYMFIC C~f~ICAL CO.
UR,NGf COU~TY OfV. COfif.
nRANGE COLNTY FA~~ SUFPLY CO.
O~ANG[ VALVf i FJJTING CO.
CVli>h[f.0 l~Olll' ((1 rr r:Pn!C~[ rTY
f• X ¥[. f.tJ c; f H V l C £.
COLNlY S/l~ll~TlC~ Dl~T~ICT
n:·r, ll\:(JUSTHIES, It~(.
fACIFlf F~NC[ CO.
rAr1r1r TELfFHOMF
f· j\ l.l. rr ~-€ AC cu ~"II; I l <i ( n •
fHT~ liHH"JHi!
r LIH:A-Ct.L lCRH11'\/IT lr.t.
f·fCKWICK FArF:fi Pl~O()llCTS
PITNfY [:OHS.
rorrrR noILf P ~~PVJ~r. 1Nr.
r r1~. H'" ~ l L. P
l·'Old I~ H<Ud'. IM;, I f!f •
ht.l'Olll rRlMF<OH ICI
RAtfERlY lNTfP~trrn~~L lRUCK~
nAIMPO~ Ol~fO~Al en.
Ttif Pr c: r ~ T r r.
Tl!I. Htt:•·Llf ~-l'fTl'I er .• (\f
F · JI I' trl .-: ~ M £ Y fl; ~-
i' U :-. :. c ri f.Of\ ~ l r.ur TI 0"~. J :-,!(;.
S • P • F' • f' AC II Hff P Y U. G • , tr~ C •
~r.t-dA """ c.cnc,E
f. /. ~ T A A '°J A f u· c Tf1 I r r-a:t u ·~ ~
~: 1.f, i /I I ~ !· /': :, Cr..
~i t. '' T I ~,: :: t. l r i I.' r.
!:'CCJi'U!:· C Gtit• •
SfVf~-UP eGTTLIN~ en.
~·•At~Fro. ~l.l'PL.Y
~toA\.lt 11;;11fTt Kfll.l, I Til.
~l'Jld -01. r\.lil ~-(r·ld •
Cl/I H~S PA IP 0)/11/A't
H'('llJrJl
(
$24.0C
\7?,4~2.74
1b~"·12
-;. '• J\ ~. 3 ~··
i \ 11. n -~
Slt!l?.6elflJ
1292.1)1
S-;>113.71
12lf". :>~
i.11
1 .~ .\ 'I • •; 7
iu;.511-1.1.11
:J.Jt2 6. 88
it37.9~
$30'1.55
11'•2·5l•
<. 7? 7. 7 [;
$ct':4'?'te97
1491.!:0
1-15.00
1·1?.?e55
l.;>.(,-)7.f.(;
11.l.4<;.';.~
'f.C.r>!Je6~
3.ltl:>2.~.8
'LH't. ?.7
t '1'.l ,, • 5£.
11,;:f;ii.'JC
1'H1t1.n(i
'k~u. no
~n.1.35
1-3~ 4 •OU
1. :>. e 11~ H • 3~
1H6">•6 11
... ,, •). 20
H1t>t.552el'l
it • •14 a;. no
3-461.2~
j: \f4 .~. CJ3
1 ,, 7 :'·. ri .~
1. 't ~-. ~=. (j
1~)l.l2. bu
f.23,5i;1t.r·~
13t31<:J.P.5
'f, ;> t II "l 7 • .r. ~
1-1 !1? .... ~-
Pl' S ('I\ IP T 1 (; N
VALVE SUPPLIES
RETEHT I Otl I -2R-1
SAFETY SUPPLIES
PI PE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MANHOLE RING & COVERS
SMALL HARDWARE
TRUCK TIRE SUPPLIES
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
WATER USEl\GE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
BULK CHLORINE
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
DOOR REPAIRS
SPECIALTY GASES, WELDING SUPPLIES
REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND
PA I NT SUPPLIES
PLAN CHECK OVER-DEPOSIT
TELEMETER I NG
PALLETS
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
POSTAGE HETER RENTAL
BOILER REPAIRS
POSTAGE
CONCRETE
IHDUSTRAIL WASTE SAMPLING ICE
TRUCK PARTS
TRASH DISPOSAL
LEGAL AND CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
PIPE SUPPLIES
fRE I GltT
CONTRACTOR 5-18R
EHGINE REPAIRS
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRIC MOTOR
BUILDING MATERIALS
PLAN CllEC K OVE R-OEPOS IT
MINI COMPUTER SUPPLIES
USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT
TOOLS
PLAN CHEKC OVER-DEPOSIT
TOOLS
.
w
(\
r-· f:.
1.I
I I
•I .. 1.·. ·.:
··1 ....
!•1
i.:
'
(
FUl\!0 l\C
\JtlH\/·NT r\o.
li67~?S
r161 ~.~4
06 73:.>5
(.f 7 !.;!I_:.
.:.t.7~?7
Cl. L~2U
oc n.~Q
0(. 73~-(j
l:f7331
i; f., :-~~'
tt-; v<:
lib ·13~~4
C6n~5
OE 73?·£-
(~f n.."!.1
11 t-·1 :-..~r
:::: u~ 1 • :."::
~ ~:(, 1 ~.ltU
_."':::'Of-7341
:::: ')f.7 :~ lj('.
Of,73.ci:S
r. ( 7 :~'•'I
'.(, ., ? 1;5
Jf. 7 J't(,
frl-7~47
Ol1'!4P
(
c;1·~'.i -.n nJ5T 1-:Cf\KtNr •. ct.J 1-lAL-------------··· .. _ --···--. -... -· -FfiOCESSJNr:-OAH 11r,6/H'+ 1~AGf 't
REPORT NUHOER AP~3
COUNlY ~A~JTATJON nJSTRJCTS OF OP~NGE COU~TY
vrnL'O~
~OUTtf COAH OFFJC[ [QL1JPr1 ENT
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO.
SO. f.Allfe ~Af[R CO.
~CUJ~[P~ rc~~Tll~ OIL (0.
H. f> t'. A~ t-• S 1 I r.ttl l r • , I NC •
Hlf ~Ur'H I£ l?S
J. WAYNE SYLVESTER
TELETYPE CORr.
F.~. T~C~AS ~IP CONnJTIONING
lE~rFJr CC~TROL ~rRVIClt TNC.
Tf.IA I LS I llt: HOM(. r-.
1RhNSAK£RlCA DfL~VAL
TRUCK & ALTO SUPPLYt JN[.
TU£ ESH ES
llt>.JTfO HPCfL ~[PVJCC
lJNJHO HAH$ [(;UJN':F.:NT co.,
V t.i Jl SC I E tJl I F I r
VALLEY CJTllS SUPFLY CO.
VAP[C, Jl'!C.
JOttN R. ~.IAPLE S
~ARPfN ~ f-AJL[v
i.: t. LI K r ~ ... i\ E. t\ ( I rJr ~-; f R v I r r N 1[ F
I.' f S H P. ~-~11 J; I r. t LL 11 Y ~
~GURKL & ~CCORurr, INC.
~fROX CGFP.
£VERl TT ti. YOPK CO.
flt. 114~-Pl• JO ni /l J /P,4
AMOUNT
t.115. A'1
12a5,'J3.S.5P
t(??. f;(:
$410.15
12H.117
1-2t538.~\7
Ut112.6ti
~107.46
1'.,~i).(10
nu .. uu
OH.22
S.fH •0 2
t994.ti5
BRJ. n
11~.\.lfO
1-lt?.(-~
i1.~q!j.7~
~,j.J~
i31.64
1-382. AO
1-'t CIC). 04
1. t • 1 1 3 • 1 (:
$ t ' :1 1 l • 1~ f
u1,so1.21
H'L3•1l'
1-ll45·71
1 0 l " L (. I. i1 I t1 ~. J-A 1 r. ( 1 / l 1 / '' '' ~ h f, 6 ' 2 5 ., • fl t'
===~~===========~
Cf.SCI? IF'T I ON
OFFICE HAClllNES
POWER ·
WATER USEAGE
DIESEL FUEL
HETER
TOOLS
PETTY CASll REIHDURSEHENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
PLAN CltECK OVER-DEPOSIT
VALVES
TRUCK PARTS
PIPE SUPPLIES
DELIVERY SERVICE
COMPRESSOR PARTS
LAB SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
FREIGHT
ODOR CONSULTING
ELECTRICAL SUPPl.IES
ENGINE PARTS
WELDING SUPPLIES
LEGAL SERVICES, TRAVEL EXPENSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ENGINE PARTS
(
I
I I
I .)
./
:':
...
FUND NO 9199
SUMMl\RV
62 OPER FUND
82 l\CO FUND
#2 F/R FUND
#3 OPER FUND
63 ACO FUtlD
#3 F/R FUND
#5 OPER FUND
65 ACO FUND
H6 orER FUND
U7 OPER FUND
#I I -OPER FUND
#11 ACO FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
/16& 7 OPER FUND
~ JT OPf"R FUND
· 1 CORF
JT DIST WORKING CAPIT~L
\..,., SELF FUNDED LI AB I LI TV CLA IHS INSURANCE FUND
:::: SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND
JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/11/84
(' ;,
PROCESSING DATE l/06/81t PAGE
REPORT NUMBER APltJ
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID Ol/11/81t
~NT
$ 2,1118.15
29,700.00
116. It 30. 05
I, JOI. 27
.... 000. 00
12,300.00
I, 056. 81
66,352.81
19.70
30,903.61t
1,899.56
,, • 2 50. 00
816. 73
2,981.21
3111,830.09
80,701.11
1t92.50
2,991t.97
62.679.28
$666,257.88
(
5
('
... ..
cJ
I
i--a
~
(
rU~lJ NC. ·-iJ19tJ
\J ,\ ~ R 1\ !IJT N (l •
fJf.7:!70
0f.J.l71
1•f.7.~ 7?
u. nn
"'.(737'1
rn:-.n
(i(, p 7f,
fi6 7 ~ 71
( f. 7 -~ ., ,.
re E7C:
if 7 ~ f 1 0
r6nP1
r-r,13n
CfB~3
:·6 7 '!f·'•
ff>72'f,5
f•(7~Rf
067387
Of: 731lH
U·73£-q
ff·; ~C"·Q
ul 7? r, I
=· f 7 :! q;.
06 7 3c:.3
f.f. 7 .1'54
n~73C::~
~f.l!.':h
C(:1?.':·7
( f '~ ".·f·
l.6 73C";'1
&r:74lit
t;C,14(,J
n f.• 111 i,~
:·f. 7 '• ~:.~:
(.f 7 4 f '+
I'( 74 O!·.
•H ·1 '' (.f·
r.b 1H:1
:) f, "/II(, /I
j· (. 7 ,, 1: ~,
.~6741(:
,1(;71tll
:': C: 7 11 I(:'
Of 7 4 J .3
I' f• J 1;) 11
~f7'•1'.·
(
-Jt .. Otst iJCPl<ING C:Af'iTAi. . PROClSStNcf DATE iitci/~'' fiiGt
R(PORT NUMBER llF43
(
COU~TY SANITATION OISlRlCTS OF OR~~G[ COUNTY
CU. TM~: Pl\ Ji-r)l/~'1/fl'1
V[ Nr' OP.
AOVA~CO CC~STRUCTOPSt JNC.
AEP.CO cc~rRl~SO~S, INC.
/ill ·$1h1C VElfJCl[St H·r.
All IEO f.UPrl'f ro.
H'![klCllN lllR rllHP. me.
~MCNICA~ CCNCRLTl CUTTING, INC
A~ERICA~ SCIE~llFIC PFOPUCTS
~MfRJCAN SIGMA
l Hf. M.; C ti 0 P J:-ii Cl''. I N f C 0 •
llNG[l.JCA H[NTAL SFkVJf.f5
II r. U ~ '-' f I\ C Cl I' P •
AR~OW~Rtsco. INC.
ASSOCIAlJON OF ~CTROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES
PAN~ or Af'fRICt NT i SA
~[C~MiN l~STRUfLNlf
PELL PIPE t SUPFLY ro.
l'HliONT E~GJN[[PJ!';(:
~tt~[y & A~~OtJAtt~, iNt.
bOB•S AIR CONDITIONING
roMAR ~AG~[10 S[RVICFt JHC.
~tYLt [~~i~llRING COFP
fltCl•fl(L f·PHClf'l''J ~ fl5SOC., IMC
Tllr r-URK [ ( OMff.N Y
. uuift.R• ENGJ~E(RING, Hie.
C & ~ R[CCNOITIONING CO.
C~T CALJFCP~IAt INC.
c~ ro,..r M!Y
C.'-1.r-.r:.A.
C/IL-GLA~~ fCJ? P(Sf/1RCllt lf"f.
CAL-FAC C~£MtCAL cc., INC.
CALIF. AS!GC. or SA~. AG[NCJ[S
ltl[ C/.P HLHHON[ r.o.
J011 N ri111 0L LO Uif-1 Nl H ~
JOt•N [ lltHIL LO [M;J Nf. FR$
~O~TIE CARTE~ CONSTPUCTIG~
Ch~~CER·MJX CONfRETF, INC.
CHEVPOI\ ~.s.~., INf.
CONHOCI< COf~PANY
CON~OLIUAlE~ LLrCT~ICIL Pl~T.
COi\~\ol IDA H ,. rH f· f'(.IH!C TI m:~
c 0 f\ T HI r I\ T H r 11 u· I u L c r.
COOP[H (Nl"F.f.Y ~tRVICfS
ttUfl;TY \,.;JC£ l.P'C
COUPTON ~ /IS~OCIATFS
r H r !.! u v r f\ v 111 o I\ n r: 1 "· L ~ rr. v 1 c r ~
fH CClf·J~(ll. )(:I.Tr (1 ~:ti HF
AMOUNT
$2!it575.70
$51.50
t1,22q.92
!666.Rl
s1q~~1
i11,f69.ro
1234.30
i468.EO
IY4~.;R
i11~.o~
117tq6R.1C
iu9.5~.
!-If. 781. 0 0
160.18
$3.415.26
Li76.f\~
t;.>fl,9itiJ.40 isso.ao
!520.f-6
S29l\.G2
$ltq't3.73
3.5,512.1)7
l23t>.02
s3'1,19i.so
i.s10.on
:tf.H 6. Q{,
:14·1~.26
~-2rJO.CIO
1-':.6 .53
$.sCJ.16
U1f.5(J.00
!45.no
$4l,q29.4~
H-.2111.lr
,,7,uc.S.'19
1242.03
1l3•212.q6
1-652.67
12,511.~:i.
1'.?'4 9 '-1. lj 0
'l2tl07.fit1
U1£147.i.l6
1.424 •. .H
F170.00
<; "f\ :> • t F.
lf.4.7:1
PlHRIFllON
CONTRACTOR P2-27
COMPRESSOR PARTS
VEHiCLE .LEASING
AIR CONDITIONING CONTROLS
AIR CONDITIONING HAINTENANCE
jUNCTION BOX REPAIRS
LAB SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PUMP PARTS
TOWEL RE NT Al
CllEHICAL COAGULENTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP DUES
TRAVEL EXPENSES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
CONTRACTOR PW-107
WORKERS 1 COMP. ADMINISTRATORS
TRUCK REPAIRS
ENGINE PARTS
MAStER PLAN UPDATE 170 SEWER HAINTEHANCE DISTRICT
CSDOC #2,3,11 MASTER PLAN EIR
PIPE SUPPLIES
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-23/P2-2~, P2-23-6 CLAltt
PUMP REPAIRS
WORD PROCESSOR MAINTENANCE
VALVES
SEHINAR REGISTRATION
LAB SUPPLIES
i>ESCALER
MEMBERSHIP DUES
PAGER REPAIRS
ENGR. J-15, Pl-20, P2-25-2, EHERGY TASK FORCE
ENGR. P2-26, ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPSOAL
HIXJNG TANK ~[PAIRS
BUILDING MATERIALS
GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL
BUILDING MATERIALS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
CHLORINE
ENGINE PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
CSDOC #1,6,7 MASTER PLAN flR
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
!
,: )!
•
-..
tllNO NO
w 11 r· 11 •' r. T r, r. •
o3
I r·-..:>
rc74lb
(•b7'll7
f'f7 1•lf
i-£.7t,IC::
"(· 74?·~
1.1 c742l
c•1114n
M.·7423
r f 1 1• e.11
: ( 71, ~ !"
l•f 7'• ~ f:.
Cf-7t,27
flf.74('f.
0 f. 7" 2"J
[ i. I 11 2 l•
fl(· -!'d 1
(. 7 'd::
f-1'13.~
(, 74 ~4
<· 74 ~.r:
:::: I_ f, 7'f ~f
'(. -, ,, "! 7
~{-7 'f ~!
r. f-74 .~.<?
(.f, 1 .. 4 c;
Cl 7441
~(7'•42
~f ,,.,,:~
.' ( 7 't 4 4
::E: 7'1 "~
(;b 7'14b
GE-HH
: f 7 ,, ,, ,.
i;(. 7 4 4 r.
;_ r:-·1" ~ r.
t.c 74~1
t"f., i'15:?
q; 1 11 !:.3
~· f-7 4 !:: 'I
f (; ., ,, !;. ~.
r ( 7 4 ':' l-.
i:f, 7 '• ::-7
l)f 74~ll
rf. 145CJ
ff· 71, (.1:-
1' !· ·1111· I
c·
5 1 r. c1 -,JT f:\ 1 5 1 \JO P f\ I N C. C A f' I T /IL. r: fl 0 Cl ~ 5. I ~JG [I A H 1 / l 11 I n 11 I' Id· C
RfFORT NUHA[H Af4~
fOUNTY SANJ JATlON OJSlRICTS OF ORtNCl COUNTY
VI MH.n
(lf4( t I NC.
041\!A HFG., INf..
l"C:C 0
fflft·J ~YSl[fS. I~r.
[JflLIFFC A~~OCIAlC~
COOG[ CGNSl~UCTION ~[US
DORADO [NTE~FRISfSt INC.
DU~~S tl[S£l INJECTIO~
~~~N CC~P~CS C~Pr.
flfCC F~CCf~~ fGUI•. CP.
lA~THAN, l~C.
fNGJ~EfRJNG-SCIENCE
fNVIRON~El\Til fPCOUCT~ INT'l•
fNVIROl\f[l\ltl P[SCUPC[ At~oc.
[l\VJP.O~h1 UH r.c.
r !\l1 Cf1
FA~'llJllN FJH ~ SUPf'LY
f[U[RAl £XPRlSS CORP.
fl5HfR SCIENTIFIC CO.
FLAT 8 V[PTICAL CONCRETE
rurro•·c r.. rofKfRT
FOUNTAJ~ VALL[Y CA~f PA
f olO:ONl I(\[ [NJ JTY c o,::.l'r<f 1 y
FRUIT GRC~fPS LA~ORATORY1 J~C.
FULCO SAU.S
CllY Of FVLLE~TON
Gf'.:[f:Al Tf.l[F1 1 0~1[ CO.
ti-" JH~TPl:f·'OJT CON·M;Y
I 'LFRI~ ~LFflY CO.
E.G. HflLER•S so~. J~C.
UOLCll(M, INC.
R • S • •! U G ti [ S C 0 • , I II; C •
( I n 0 F M Ull I rvr; 1 OfJ H II c ..
I ([ I N q H L r.f' fH
i SC (I CC fl. r M. 'I
1 f4 p ER I H "rs T Ct• n I c AL c ft •
lNOUST~IAL llf.PHllLT
HWUSTFJ/.l 1HR[A0f£1 FROOllCTS
J~l[f.Ole .'lt"t.F'JCfl
l1'":VJf,l S"1 Ul'J~r. ~lj;VJCf
JOY ,lliLFAClURJrG rr.
KA:-; SAfrTY PRODUCTS
KING PFARJNG, JNr.
l g N UNIFrfiM SUffLY en
l. • c: • t... • ~ • , I I' C •
t:. r:":TH l'l·H'ICAL fliCl.1 t1 rT~
,, •.
CLAIMS rAJ~ ~l/~5/""
.AMOUtH
(
'f J ,, '\. •)3
\<l:>?.. 73
s.o;:> • ??
'f.1 '1!)0. 'J 0
ie9. u11
1205.0(1
154t677.'l2
$3,~60.6~
i.;.:;>4.07
1 .;11". 4 h
s2.a1t;-.23
$ lj 5 t ;; IJ 0 e \) 0
:t.S..H.~.12
!0 2H.50
l'J2.~1(1
1240.1£.
i75·6fl
t.2'1.00
t.78.59
1124.00
1.no.or•
4•J.')4
:1.'>t't2't•07
1.?£i.oc
11·27CJ.95
'J.37.6'+
!·7.l~A.l~
1221.0 1
';. lfq. 26
'.£2%.lff':
i12.210 •. Vt
H 'Jl. 3H
$0.1\2
1.:~4.~7
f.J tHQ6.H~
S.3t7?2.20
~·2 R • f-1
~l~'t.05
...... I t 'l T, 1 e •'; C'
1 ttr:> , •• ~· l.
:J. '•:\'.I. c:.4
1151.43
1.3,q~q.~h
!· 4, .~44.n1
'f 1 d '.'?..;;-~.
1-'• ., • '• 4
u ~~ r " 1 r T 1 ci tJ
TRUCK PARTS
PUMP REPAIRS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PENSION PLAN PROGRAMMING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LEGAL ADVERTISING
CONTRACTOR PW-110, ENGINE REPAIRS
ENGINE PARTS
PAINT SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CO-COMBUSTION FEASIBILITY STUDY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
LAB ANALYSIS
CSOOC 05&6 MASTER PLAN EIR
DRAPES
PIPE SUPPLIES
DELIVERY SERVICE
LAB SUPPLIES
CORE OP.ILLIHG
SURVEY P2-26
FILM PROCESSING
SURETY' PW-098
LAB ANALYSIS
SMALL llARDWARE
WATER lJSEAGE
TELEPllOHE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SHALL HARDWARE
TOOLS
CAUSTIC SODA
SAFETY SUPPLIES
WATER USEAGE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
FLOW MONITORING DEVICE LEASE
FERRIC CHLORIDE
BUILDING MATERIALS
SHALL HARDWARE
llVOROGEN PEROXIDE TANK RENTAL
PLANT MAINTENANCE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY SHOES
BEARING SUPPLIES
UNIFORH RENTAL
WELDING SUPPLIES
LAD SUPPLIES
•
(
(
FUN(; NO
\~,'I f r. ,\ N 1 f'! r •
(l(1 74f.2
0(· 7" f-3
l·(· 74 (14
:(:.'/4(~!
~ f 71, (_ !•
1f711(17
i6Hff!
'.! f 74 C-9
Id· ·111 7r.
:Hc7J
:. f 71, 72
U-7413
(f.1'•74
f•h7'•75
!, (. /11"/F-
;. (· 7 ,, 17
;. ( 7 4 7 (l
::: : f 7 4 79
b:1 (· f. 7'I f' '.J
I (•f.74~1
\.N IC74fC.' :: ' ( J 4 f-3
i £: 7 '• f. tJ
f•f 74 f-~J
r:f. 7 4 (' (·
CE: 74r.7
i c 7'·H·
: (· ., •• fr;
/I 7 '4 r: (;
l·b 7'•91
1'£:7'•q2
G(,749~.
,(-7 4 ('. ,,
;';., 'l 4 Cl~
l;f,]4Q(
q. 7 4 97
H·749ft
(.(, 7'1 OC
l i ., !1\ (1
; t 1 ~. [ 1
"(. 'l r :· ;'
U:1~C~
~E: 7!'-(.'I
rf 7r· 1·~
11 t 7'" r '·
:'(. 7' I' 7
..
(
~199 -JI ot~l WCPKING CAFJTAL PficcrsslNG OAf[ 1/11/~4 rtiGr
Rf~URl NUMOrR Ar4~
c (I lJ" TY s A tJ ) T/11 JO N I) I s T R I c T s 0 r (j r At~ t l c c ll N T y
Vf Nf!OR
LAURSfN fClf.P Ll~
LE~CC ELECTPIC CO.
l I r 11 l I l"i li [, I !:· l R I f I,; T r-p •: ' r N r •
LOCAL iGr~cv FrRMAT!OH r~~~ISSION
Tll[ Cl-Ul<U5 LC'l\.11' rn.
f'l'll-lllCLf HJllSl Jfl!G
fARDO. SUSCC
f-IATT -CtlLOP, HIC.
"· c I< J N LE y £. (. li I p 11 r N T r. n fl r
~· o~ 1, ~ Tf ~ -c A R u s tJ r rt v r o •
"ITCl'lll l'IMIALSt lf\C.
~OttT~O~(~Y llCVATOR CO~PANY
MOTOROLA, JNC.
NATIONAL LUHB£~ SUPFLY
~1 t, T i 0 NH Ht-. 1 C ~
( I T y c F fl; E lol r 0 i~ r H 1-C Ii
CC(A~ S~LT CC., INC.
cl~~PIC C~E~ICAL c~.
C~iNGf VALVl ~FITTING CO.
OR I H X CORF
CiXYGfN Si.RV; ··r
Cl. fl HIS r A HI 11 11 :? 5 I f1t1
llf"'OUNl
1.?5.13
1'fR5.~·'?
1.2(,3.70
1_t,') ').I) 0
PJ;>.2~'
f. J ,3~1tl. fJO
1-14,598.3:!
1.102.22
~24~ • .'!':
J.~., ••. ~4
:!H2.~C
12~R.'tP
in,o.s5.2q
$l76~U
·r5~d.EH
·1.:~ .3. ~ ~
1.fo 16. 75
iu.1.;6.i14
!-~d:?9.A2
Sl.7?!l.67
I l( <; r I• I r· ' I "t~
FILH PROCESSING
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ANNEXATION 6112 PROCESSING FEE
PUMP PARTS
CSDOC #2,3 HANllOLF. REPAIRS
PW-I02A PIPINr.
PIPE SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
PAINT SUPPLIES
PUBLICATIONS
PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
BASE STATION COHHUNICl\TIONS EQUIPMENT
SHALL HARDWARE
Ll\B SUPPLIES
WATER USEAGE
SALT
BUL·k tHLOR IN E
PIPE SUPPLIES
SHALL HARDWARE
SPECIALTY GASES, OEHURRAGE
(
c our\ l v er tt~i.riiif
rcu~TY SA~lltltO~ r1s1~1c1s or ORANGE COUNTY
o~ANGE COLN1Y ~~TtR OI~T~lCT
lllS. "1.
'.!.;,·,J~2.c:~,
12,794.11 ,.,.a o. 1?
ni;o.i;2
,,3 ~L' •EH~
TESTING P2-26, QUARTERLY PAGER MAINTENANCE
REPLENISH WORKERS' COHP. FUND
F~CIFIC HCfilLf OFfJC[S
f· AC J F J C BE L l
PllP.H Ul\Lll1 llH
PH·t1i-r11L CC.PHIPA11ClN
l·tid'A FURl J•r1c~;lJCH. Jf C.
r1rnn l'OH~·
QU~LJTY 6l1LDINC. SU~PLY
Tllf REf'LflllC HIFPLY r.o. OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
r. c -n.ou: 11 u . ..,. Jr.aw s ll"f-L v c <'.
fJ 1 C h /\I\[; ' ~ • • l: ~ fl ll L I C' ~.
f. 0 f't: I N S f I· -,: · :· £ i: c
1~ror.10Rr rot1 JN5 ro1w
SANCON INC.
SANn OCLL/I~ ~U~J~r~s FO~M~
Sll•RS, ~C(l LtK f. ff.
~Ht.tU:P C: ll·l·fi• ll'H.
~II f r1 I-' 0 c K s l: J r Ly
SH[PHARC t'f.rt•H.lfJH ro.
~Jrs J~[USlRlAL SUPFLY
C lill I\ L f ~ S fl I Tl' r (I • , 1 N f. •
~(. rotsJ •!~ tU~lllY HAHAGEHENT DISTRICT
~.(Ill f I f JH, c '· l Ir. f.(; I ~·or· f( .•
11,'J:!t:.4lf
t'H5.~G
11.-lf!J.;>2
$75. Or}
\fl :'I. 14
'i.42.(lb
:t l • f, ,, ':'. b fl
·1 .~ ,, •\. ,: 7
~fl1,7ctl.'tl
i2n.1r:.
u,non.oo
7-Ha.i::t·
1.2 .. i2.~.'i?.
1; •I :'l'I. fo ii
11,111.?.57
$3t.J~.3.7A
, •;g ~ .... 'i
1 H't. 7'
i 1 '1 :~.? p.
'i H q • j ~ t• • r: 7
WATER PRODUCTION
PLANT 62 TRAILER RENTAL
TELEMETER I NG
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
POSTAGE HETER HAINTENANCE
BUILDING HATERIALS
PIPE SUPPLIES
STEEL STOCK
TRUCK REPAIRS
PUHP PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
ZEBRON COATING OF SLUDGE TRAILER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOOLS
ENGR. 5-18R
TOOLS/SHALL 111\RDWARE
ENGINE REPAIRS
WELDING SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
PUBLICATIONS
POWER
..
f ll Nll t, r.
W f. f> f\/. N l f\' Cl •
(1 ~ 1': llf.I
H-7~(.9
;. (. 7 '... J I\
:'6"f~ll
i ( 7 r 1 :>
l.f-7~1:
Cf.7~~14
t: 6 7'l l c;,
: ( ., ~) !•
'id~I7
•( F Jf:
:-: f, i"~.19
(~7~;'0
l. f 1 !· ~· 1
: .. !-15< ~
l I 7<.;-·.,
i 1·. 7 ~·:; '•
::: H7~."!">
t:O ( 6 75?f-.
I '!(. 7'.:.1'21
::"'---~ ( 1-:: ~· s .. ::: .• 7:: ~ <;
t i· 7 ~' ~ :i
\~f. '15~1
:. f, 7'!.. ! "
{If: 75:Z3
r f 7r:.:z ,,
r(l~?~i
...
(
r11•:CJ -JT DISi ~fPl<INC· u.rnn F'l\C'r!:SSHIG [!t.J[ 1/1'1/Hil l'flH
R[FPRT Nu~nrr Af43
,,
GnUNlY ~A~Jl~flON PJSTRIClS UF OFA~t[ COUNTY
vr.rmrr.
SO. CAL. CA~ f.I".
SOUlH[PN cr~NTJ(S CJL en.
'.: 0 u T u H f c.; T F I l )( I'~ L r ~· [ ~! r p r \> u I I
~ P F E [ E ~. r. E £ ! 0 ti I T [ f'
~.T/lP.C.1-1 5Ti'r --
SLIFER C .. (t' CORP
Hi[ $UHL I EP.S
J. WAYhE $YLVESJ£R
f.F. T~C~AS jJF CO~OJTJONi~G
TO~Y'~ LCrK K ~Aff ~[VVICf
l~A~~-A,(~ICA nrLA\riL. J~c.
TR4V[l ~UFfS
TRUfl< '-tLTO SUPFLY• INC.
J.G. TUCl<[R R SONt INC.
llTY OF JU'SI JN
tf\JC~ Cll er. n fHH.
U~lTLD ~hRCfL ~c~v1rr
\rl.IR SCHNTJfJr
VALLfY CITIES SUPPLY ro.
(ft~L WARPEN t er.
~AU~[S~A L~EIN[ ~l~ViCfMTEP
wr~TE~~ Wl?I ' ALLPY~
t..f ~ T ]fllr.llOL H fl.L (Tl< Ir: rorr
J.L. WINGEPT CO.
ROURKE & i-.OCORLIF-f, INC•
HHO>< cc11r.
Y -TIRf
(-l (, f.' r. [ y I Ill· L l y /; s ~ n C' I A Tr ~.
ru. tr'.S ""II' ;1)/('5/Hlf
A~OUNT
:t.11.212.f.f.
$11,357.Jf:
SFIHof:t
1 ;> f'. ;> • 4 r~
I-l t l 1; ti • 'f .,
1.,;3(,. f)(j
L~2t'l • ~ .~.
S7C=l3.69
1 1 • liHi • C'!!l
't~3.1Ho
1. :i ,, • 6 ~.
.tldAl.ilO
$2,1\75.27
1-&lf. 11
•J.7 6. 4£:.
1. J 6. f]
·j 'if,. 90
'!.291.02
~·'151.47
Hca.oo
J 2 IJ ,, • 71)
·: t 7 7. it~
u t "/03. -~~
Hf.0.54
11~ .. q71.).50
S.3t377o4P
1. 7cn. (i;:
'i;?76.4l
TCTfiL ClflJHS FAJ(I .,1/,5/Pt+ S603t332·1~·
===~~============
(
'"'f ~ fr< I P J I CJ "I
NATURAL GAS
DIESEL FUEL
VALVES
TRUCK PARTS
STEEL STOCK
CHEMICALS
TOOLS
PETTY CJ\Sfl RE I HBURSEHENT
AIR CONDITIONING HJ\INTENANCE
LOCKS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
J\IR FARE, VARIOUS HEETINGS
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
WATER USEAGE
GASOLINE
DELIVERY SERVICE
LAB SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLIES/MATER llEl\TER
LIABILITY CLAIHS ADHINISTRJ\TOR
ENGINE PARTS
WELDING SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
LEGAL SERVICES
XEROX REPRODUCTION
TRUCK TI RES
VALVE SUPPLIFS
., .
..
(
o3
I
\.J1
::::
(
ruND NO
SUMMARY ---
HI OPER FUND
/I I ACO FUND
1/2 OPER FUND
H2 ACO FUND
#3 OPER FUND
H3 ACO FUND
65 orrn FUND
#5 ACO FUND
1/6 ACO FUND
H7 OPER FUND
/17 ACO FUND
9199
II 11 OPER FUND
/111 l\CO FUND
1/13 ACO FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
85&6 ACO FUND
#6&7 OPER FUHD
JT OPER FUND
CORF
:· •'• .
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND
SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COHP. INSURANCE FUND
JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND
TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 01/25/84
(
Cl ., ,fa •
PROCESSING DATE 1/19/8~ PAGE
REPORT NUHBER AP~3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/25/0l,
AMOUNT
$ . 185.50
582.00
6,875.23
2, r.eo. 1,3
10,399.51,
3,691.82
2, 731.99
2, I 511. 00
188. I 0
It, 31to. "1
1, I 51. 911
6,165.07
551.21
'• 1. 68
2,681.55
92. 00
1}.02
219, 2011. 20
267,618.ltB
I, 517. 50
3. Jl1l,. 11
67,318.37
$603,332.15
(
s
..,.
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of
7:30 p.m., February 8, 1984, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing Districts' Superinten-
dent, William N. Clarke, to attend
the water Pollution Control Federa-
tion Region 8 conference in Reno,
Nevada on February 23 & 24, 1984
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Districts' Superintendent, William
N. Clarke, be, and is hereby, authorized
to attend the Water Pollution Control
Federation Region 8 conference in Reno,
Nevada, on February 23 & 24, 1984; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of
minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of February,
1984.
1984.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of February,
Secretary of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, ?1 6, 7 and 11
'-"'
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of
7:30 p.m., February 8, 1984, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 2 Ms. Suzanne Atkins reported that the
Verbal Report of General Counsel Districts had recently discovered that
the Santa Ana River Interceptor, which
was built in 1973, does not have an appropriate easement in the vicinity between
Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove Freeway. While the interceptor was
intended to be built within existing Santa Ana River flood control easement, the
property owner identified the problem when seeking permits to construct a large
office complex and parking facilities in the vicinity of the interceptor.
The Deputy Chief Engineer and General Counsel had met with the owner to review
the estimated value of the easement, and have received a proposal from the
property owner to sell the Districts an appropriate easement for $95,000, which,
in their determinati6~, is less than one-third of the $600,000 approximate value
of the one-acre parcel.
Ms. Atkins recommended that the Board authorize the General Counsel and the
Deputy Chief Engineer to negotiate with the property owner to purchase the
easement for a price not to exceed $95,000.00, as the price acceptable to the
owner appears fair and reasonable.
Following a brief discussion among the Directors regarding the value of the
property and the limited effect of the easement on the property owner, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Counsel and Deputy Chief Engineer be, and are hereby, authorized
to negotiate for and acquire an appropriate easement for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor in the vicinity between Garden Grove Boulevard and the Garden Grove
Freeway for an amount not to exceed $95,000.00.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
·~ COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of
minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of
February, 1984.
1984.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of February,
Secretary of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11