Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-10-12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OeOK AREA DE 74OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927138 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) October 5, 1983 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WE'DNESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1983 - 7 :30 P.M. 10844 ELLIs AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. A"L.- Secretary Scheduled Upcoming Meetings : BUILDING COMMITTEE - Tuesday, October 18th at 5: 30 p.m. PROPOSED DISTRICT 13 STEERING COMMITTEE - Thursday, October 20th at 5: 30 p.m. (Tentative) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 26th at 5: 30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270! (714) 540-2910 �J (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings October Oct 12, 1983 Oct 26, 1983 November Nov 9, 1983 (Date to be determined) December ' Dec 14, 1983 None Scheduled .r January Jan 11, 1984 Jan 25, 1984 February Feb 8, 1984 Feb 22, 1984 March Mar 8, 1984 Mar 22, 1984 April Apr 11, 1984 Apr 25, 1984 May May 9, 1984 May 23, 1984 June Jun 13, 1984 Jun 27, 1984 July Jul 11, 1984 Jul 25, 1984 August Aug 8, 1984 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1984 Sep 26, 1984 October Oct 10, 1984 Oct 24, 1984 6ARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post office Box 8127 _ of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: A JOINT BOARDS 6 -2411 I, AGENDA MEETING DATE OCTOBER 12, 1983 - 7*:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENMU EAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING (1) Pledge of AllegiAce and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - September 14, 1983, regular and September 28, 1983, adjourned District 2 - September 14, 1983, regular District 3 - September 14, 1983, regular District 5 - September 14, 1983, regular District 6 - September 14, 1983, regular District 7 - September 14, 1983, regular District 11 - September 14, 1983, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the jolt and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) "A" , "B" and "C" 9 07 83 9 08 83 9 21 83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $382,403.01 $ --- $216,715.34 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 373,964.80 --- 222,660.41 Joint Working Capital Fund - 42,796.61 25,818.95 36,672.62 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,734.48 --- 3,168.80 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- 1,760.30 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,468.17 --- 32,863.14 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 7,903.72 --- 21,374.55 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 84,551.42 --- 9,197.80 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,639.74 --- 1,756.25 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 1,300.91 --- 4,339.35 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,864.00 --- 8,862.85 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 22.50 --- 933.99 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,006.88, --- --- `:� $904,656.24 $25,818.95 $560,305.40 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(q) (9) ALL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the _ consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- r- 10/12/83 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase I, Adams Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Job No. I-2R-1, authorizing an addition of $1,881.41 to the contract with George Miller Construction Company for repair of six manhole benches and sealing of clay pipe joints under Flood Control Channel. See page "D" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-155, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, to Kiewit Pacific Company in the amount of $87,866.00. See pages "E" and "F" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-156, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $58,179.00. See pages "G" and "H" (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Four-Wheel Forklift Truck, Specification No. A-115, to McKinley Equipment Corporation in the amount of $10,269.00 plus tax. See page "I" (e) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Specialized Testing Service in the amount of $12,500.00 for testing services to evaluate varying of the coupling stiffness between the engine and gear box to resist torsional damage to said gear boxes at the Plant No. 1 blower building (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-157, approving the Leucadia County Water District, Administrator of the Encina Joint Powers Agreement, for Associate Membership in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority. See page "J" (g) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins "F" & "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2. See page "K" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-158, approving agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for engineering services re design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins "F" & "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No.' P2-5R-2, on an hourly-rate basis, for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.00. See page "L" -3- 10/12/83 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for consulting services during the construction of Primary Basins "P" & "Q" at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26. See page - "M" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-159, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for consulting services during construction of Primary Basins "P" & "Q" at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, for a fixed fee of $1,900.00 plus direct labor and indirect overhead in the amount of $12,380.00, for a total amount not to exceed $14,280.00. See page "N" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 12368 to Interox America, re Specification No. P-054, increasing the total amount from $14,000 plus tax to $43,445.00 for supplying hydrogen peroxide, technical services and equipment rental for odor and sulfide control evaluation at Plant No. 1, belt filter press facility, and for continued use at Plant No. 2, pending receipt of competitive bids for a long-range supply contract and analysis of equipment purchase options (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Supplying Ferric Chloride, Specification No. P-059, to Imperial West Chemical Company for the unit price of $.092255 per dry pound, for a total amount not to exceed $276,765.00 including tax and freight. See page "0" (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Liquid or Special Emulsion, Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-060, to Aqua Ben Corporation for the unit price of $.075 per wet pound, for a total amount not to exceed $945,000.00, plus applicable sales tax, for the period October 15, 1983 through October 14, 1984. See page "P" (1) Consideration of motion amending the Boards' action of May 11, 1983, authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for purchase of Pipe and Fittings for Replacement of a Plant Water Line at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-4, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00, revising said authority to include issuance of purchase orders for the pipe and fittings and for the installation of said pipe, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (no change in previously approved amount) DISTRICT 1 (m) Consideration of motion ratifying action of the General Counsel in initiating legal action to collect $5,237.80 in outstanding invoices owed to the District by Phil's Custom Plating, formerly of Santa Ana (Industrial Waste Permit No 1-255) -4- 10/12/83 (9) DISTRICT 3 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-162-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, providing for payment for soils investigation and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of $2,150.00 and $1,930.00, respectively, increasing the total contract from $35,000.00 to 39,080.00 See page "Qn (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-163-3, approving Addendum -. No. 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, providing for payment for soils investigation and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of $1,900.00 and $1,930.00, respectively, increasing the total contract from $22,000.00 to $25,830.00 See page "R" (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-164-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, providing for payment for soils investigation and surveying -services in the lump sum amounts of $1,900.00 and $1,930.00, respectively, increasing the total contract from $25,000.00 to $28,830.00. See page "S" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (q) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Envirosphere Company for consulting services re preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6. See page "T" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-165-5, approving agreement with Envirosphere for consulting services re preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6, based on hourly rates and overhead, for an amount not to exceed $7,440.00 plus outside services not to exceed $2,000.00, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $9,440.00. See page nun END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- 10/12/83 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal status report re Citizens' Advisory Committee work on LA/0MA Ultimate Solids Disposal Plan and schedule for review and approval of project EIS/EIR (See letter enclosed with agenda material) (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion approving revised Procedures for the Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-161, approving agreement with Natel & Company for consulting services to assist in the planning, design, selection and installation of a new telephone system, for a total amount not to exceed $16,000.00 for Phase I and Phase II work. See page "V" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of notion to convene in closed session re personnel matters (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of notion to approve a substitution of security re the Agreement for Deferral of Annexation Fees in connection with Annexation No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation to District No. 2, as requested by The Goeden Company, proponents of said annexation. See page "W" 10/12/83 (24) DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file comments received relative to the Notice mailed re preparation of Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (Copies included in enclosed Draft EIR) (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (d) Consideration of motion establishing November 28, 1983, as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (e) Consideration of motion fixing November 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. in the Districts' Administrative Office, as the date, time and place for public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 (25) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -(31) DISTRICT 1 Verbal status report re implementation of long-range financial program (32) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn `'ad' -7- �. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Box 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 JOINT BOARDS 962-24111 Meeting Date October 12, 1983 - 7: 30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda. material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board' meeting . To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager 's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer 's estimate. Detailed change orders ' are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. ALL DISTRICTS No. 9( a) : Change Order No . 1 to Job No . I-2R-1, Rehabili- tation of Bushard Trunk , Phase I . Change Order No . 1 adds 2 items of work to the contract . The major item is for remodeling and repair of six manhole benches necessitated by severe deterioration not evident until work had begun . The second item is for sealing of leaky joints in existing vitrified clay pipes under the flood control channel . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 1 in the amount of $1, 881 . 41 . There is no time extension associated with this work . No. 9( b) : Award Job No . PW-108, Sludge and Digester Gas Piping at Plant No . 2. In September , the Boards approved plans to install 275 feet of 10-inch PVC gas pipe between Digesters A and B and the old gas compressor building and to install 50 feet of 8-inch supernatant pipe to run between Digesters A and B and I and J, as well as automatic sludge valves and minor piping for Digester T, all at -1- 10/12/83 Plant No. 2. The new piping will reduce gas losses between A and B Digesters and the gas recovery system. The sludge line improvements will allow separation of bottom sludge from supernatant. The end result will be more gas available for reuse and fewer odors from intermittent release of digester gas because the existing line is inadequate for drawing off the gas from Digesters A and B. Four bids were received for the work ranging from a high of $133, 339 to a low of $87, 866 submitted by Kiewit Pacific Company of Arcadia. The engineer 's estimate was $100 , 000 . The staff recommends award of the contract to Kiewit Pacific Company for its low bid of $87, 866 . No. 9(c) : Award Job No . PW-110 , Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C" , Treatment Plant No. 2. The Boards approved plans and specifications in September for the installation of a 16, 000 pound-per-day supplemental chlorina- tion system at the Plant No . 2 "C" Headworks which will inject chlorine solution into pipes which feed the three influent distribution structures . This project will aid in mitigating odors at the Plant ...r Four bids were received for the work ranging from a high of $96, 464 to a low of $58, 179 submitted by Dorado Enterprises, Inc . of Signal Hill . The engineer 's estimate was $55 , 000 . The staff recommends award of the contract to Dorado Enterprises , Inc . for its low bid of $58, 179. No. 9(d) : Award Specification No . A-115, Four-Wheel Forklift Truck . On September 27, 1983, six bids were received for furnishing one new 3, 000 pound capacity forklift truck to be used at the new warehousing facility at Plant No . 2. The bids ranged from a high of $12, 340 to a low of $10 , 269 submitted by McKinley Equipment Co. of Irvine. The staff recommends award to McKinley Equipment Co . for its low bid of $10 , 269, plus tax. No . 9(e) : Authorizing Purchase Order to Specialized Testing Service for Coupling Stiffness Evaluation at Plant No . 1 Blower Building Gear Boxes . Three years ago, we experienced premature failure of the engine-driven gear boxes at the Plant No . 1 Blower Building . -2- 10/12/83 Based on a rather comprehensive analysis at that time by General Electric Company, we have since been running the engines at full load to minimize the wear and tear on the gears . However, this places limitations on our operating felxibility and we have con- tinued to investigate other alternatives to improve our operating capabilities . Staff recently engaged G. S. Rasmussen Co . , an expert in coupling analyses , who has recommended stiffning the coupling between the engine and gear box as a means of resisting torsional damage to the gear boxes caused by vibration . In order to evaluate the effectiveness of this modification , it is necessary to test the drive train before and after installation of the stiffning blocks . There are a. limited number of companies that perform this type of work . Specialized Testing Service of Los Angeles is the only firm known to us in this area. We have received a proposal and staff requests authorization to issued a purchase order to Specialized Testing Service in the amount of $12, 500 to perform this work . No. 9( f) : Approving Leucadia County Water District, Administrator of the Encina Joint Powers Agreement, for Associate Membership in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRPA) . The principal (original signatory) members of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRPA) are our Districts , the City of Los Angeles , the City of San Diego, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and Ventura Regional County Sanitation District . The Amended Joint Powers Agreement creating SCCWRPA provides for associate membership and the Leucadia County Water District, Administrator of the Encina Joint Powers Agreement, which serves the northern coastal area of San Diego County, has applied for associate membership. Associate members are non-voting members and are required to contribute an annual amount toward the SCCWRPA budget that is equal to the amount paid by the smallest signatory agency. Associate membership requires the unanimous consent of the principal members . Staff recommends approval of Leucadia County Water District 's application . No. 9(g ) : Approval of Selection Committee Certification and Award of Agreement to Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for Engineering Services re Job No . P2-5R-2. At the July meeting , the Boards authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals from consultants to prepare plans -3- 10/12/83 and specifications for the design of Job No . P2-5R-2, Rehabili- tation of Primary Basins F and G at Treatment Plant No. 2. The work includes rebuilding the basins with new fiberglass baffles, weirs and collection mechanism and performing necessary concrete repairs and minor piping , painting and electrical work . Staff is of the opinion that if repairs are not made in the near future, we will incur high maintenance costs and risk losing use of these basins due to a major breakdown which would severely impair our operational capabilities . Five firms were considered. The Selection Committee recommends that the firm of Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers be engaged to perform the work on an hourly rate basis for an amount not to exceed $40 , 000 . The items appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification and adoption of a resolu- tion approving an agreement for said services . Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda materia. No. 9( h) : Receive and File Selection Committee Certification and Award Contract to John Carollo Engineers for Services Required During Construction of Primary Basins P and Q at Treatment Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-26 . In September the Selection Committee was authorized to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services during the construction phase of the Primary Basins P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26 . The work will include shop drawing, witnessing of testing results and site visits as directed. The Committee has negotiated a cost plus fixed fee contract in an amount not to exceed $14, 280 for the services . The items appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the negotiated fee and adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for the services . Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda material . No. 9( i ) : Authorizing Change Order to Purchase Order No . 12368 to Interox America (Specification No . P-054) for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Technical Services and Equipment Rental for Use in Controlling Sulfides at Solids Dewatering Facilities . Last April the Boards authorized an agreement with Interox America to provide equipment (with option to purchase ) , technical services and the chemical for a trial of hydrogen peroxide to control odors and sulfides at the new Plant No . 2 belt filter -4- 10/12/83 press sludge dewatering facility. At that time, it was antici- pated that the testing would be completed so that, if it proved successful, competitive bids for an annual contract to supply peroxide could be solicited after the summer months . The hydrogen peroxide has proved to be cost effective in controlling sulfides and odors at Plant No . 2. We recently received a formal proposal from Interox America to sell the equipment that was supplied as part of the trial but, with the press of other work, staff has not had time to evaluate it. In addition , we are now experiencing odor problems at the belt filter press facility at Plant No. 1 as a result of expanded sludge dewatering requirements . We presently use potassium permanganate at Plant No . 1. Staff believes that hydrogen peroxide may work at Plant No. 1 as it has at Plant No . 2; however, because the nature of the sludge is different at the two Plants , trials are necessary to confirm its effectiveness and to determine equipment sizing requirements , chemical contact time and optimum operating modes . Interox has agreed to supply the peroxide for this trial at its same low bid price of last October . Therefore, it is requested that authorization be granted to issue a change order to Purchase Order No . 12368 to Interox America in an amount not to exceed $29, 445 , including tax and freight, to provide for testing of hydrogen peroxide at Plant No. 1 and continued utilization at Plant No . 2. Within 90 days, staff expects to accomplish the preparation of specifications to competitively bid a long-term supply contract and analysis of our equipment purchase option . Following is a breakdown of the cost: Hydrogen peroxide : 5,000 gallons at $3 .15 $15 , 750 .00 Tax on peroxide: 945 .00 7, 000 gallon tank rental for Plant No . 2 for 3 months ( $2, 500 .00 per month ) $ 7, 500 . 00 1, 000 gallon tank rental for Plant No . 1 for 3 months ( $1, 100 .00 per month ) $ 3, 300 . 00 Technical services $ 1, 800 .00 Set-up charge $ 150 .00 Total $29, 445 .00 -5- 10/12/83 No. 9( j ) : Award of Specification No . P-059, Supplying Ferric Chloride . Last April, the Boards authorized $115, 500 for the trial of ferric chloride as a backup and supplemental odor control system at Plant No . 2. The system has proven effective in reducing odors at the Plant, and last month, the Directors approved the short-term purchase of an additional $102,000 of ferric chloride which provided for enough material at the current usage rate until bids could be received for a long-term contract. On October 3rd, three bids were received and ranged from a high of $0 .125 per pound to a low of $0 .092255 per pound sub- mitted by Imperial West Chemical Company. The bids were based on supply of an estimated 3 million dry pounds of ferric chloride during the one-year contract period. The estimated total annual cost is $276, 765. The staff recommends award to Imperial West Chemical Company for its low bid amount of $0 .092255 per dry pound, plus applicable sales tax. No. 9(k) : Award Specification No . P-060 , L4quid or Special Emulsion Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent . The Districts use a polyelectrolyte chemical flocculent (polymer ) to aid in the treatment and dewatering of sludge . The current two-year contract for supplying this material is expiring and bids for a new contract have been solicited. The proposed contract contains an option to renew for up to four one-year periods under mutually-agreeable terms . The staff has conducted trials on the various liquid or special emulsion polymers under our specific operating conditions to enable an evaluation of the bids to determine the overall lowest cost based on performance rather than unit cost, which is not necessarily consistent with the lowest unit cost . Bids were received on October 4th. Based on an estimated one-year polymer requirement to treat 90 , 000 dry tons of sludge, Aqua Ben of Orange is the low bidder at a total estimated annual cost of $1, 001, 700 . The bids ranged to a high of $3 , 915, 720 . The staff recommends award to Aqua Ben at the unit price of $0 .075 per pound, plus applicable sales tax, for a total amount not to exceed $1, 001, 700 for the period October 21, 1983 through October 20 , 1984 . -6- 10/12/83 No. 9( 1 ) : Amending Board Action of May 11 , 1983 re Job No . P1-19-4 . In May the Boards authorized your General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for pipe and fittings for replacement of a Plant No . 1 water line for an amount not to exceed $35 , 000 . The staff was able to negotiate purchase orders for the pipe and fittings as well as the installation of the new water line for the previously authorized amount of $35 , 000 . The action appearing in the agenda revises the previous authorization to include the installation costs . Staff recommends approval of this action . DISTRICT NO. 1 No. 9(m) : Ratifying General Counsel ' s Action in Initiating Legal Action to Collect Outstanding_ Invoices from Phil ' s Custom Plating . The action appearing on your agenda is to ratify the action of the General Counsel in initiating immediate legal action to collect $5 , 237. 80 in outstanding invoices owed the District by Phil 's Custom Plating, formerly of Santa Ana. I} was necessary to proceed immediately because the firm has gone out of business and the first creditors to file actions and get judgments may be able to successfully attach any remaining assets . Ratification of the General Counsel ' s action is recommended. Nos . 9(n ) , (o ) and (p) : Approving Addenda to Agreements with Lowry & Associates for Design of Master Plan Sewers . In May the Boards approved agreements with Lowry & Associates for design of three master plan facilities which will relieve the existing overloaded Hoover-Western Trunk . At the time the agreements were negotiated, payment for outside services for soils and surveys were specifically excluded. The costs for these services have now been determined and the actions appearing on the agenda are to approve Addenda amending the original agreements to include soils investigation and surveying services . These amounts represent actual costs incurred by Lowry & Associates with no mark-up. The staff recommends approval of the following actions : Item 9(n ) Adoption of Resolution No . 83-162-3, approving Addendum No . 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Katella Interceptor -7- 10/12/83 Sewer, Contract No . 3-24-1, providing for payment for soils investigations and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of $2, 150 .00 and $1, 930 .00 , respectively, increasing the total contract from $35 ,000 .00 to $39, 080 .00 . Item 9(o) Adoption of Resolution No . 83-163-3, approving Addendum No . 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No . 3-24-2, providing for payment for soils investigations and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of $1, 900 .00 and $1, 930 .00 , respectively, increasing the total contract from $22, 000 .00 to $25 , 830 .00 . Item 9(p) Adoption of Resolution No. 83-164-3, approving Addendum No . 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer , Contract No . 3-25 , providing for payment for soils investigations and surveying services in the lump sum amounts -of $1, 900 .00 and $1, 930 .00 , respectively, increasing the total contract from $25 , 000 .00 to $25 , 830 . 00 . DISTRICTS NO. 5 AND 6 No. 9(q) : Receive and File Selection Committee Certification and Approve Agreement with Envirosphere Company for Preparation of EIR for Master Plan for District No . 5 and the South Half of District No . 6 . In July the Districts authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a contract for preparation of an EIR for the Combined Master Plan of Facilities for District No . 5 and the South Half of District No . 6. Requests for Proposals were sent to seven firms , four of which responded. The Selection Committee has negotiated a contract with Envirosphere Company for this work, based on hourly rates plus overhead, for an amount not to exceed $7, 440 , plus outside services for an amount not to exceed $2, 000 , for a total maximum of $9, 440 . The items appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee 's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the agreement for said services . Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda material . -8- 10/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS No. 11 : Verbal Staff Report re Citizens Advisory Committee Work on LA/OMA Ultimate Solids Disposal Plan and Schedule for Review and Approval of Project EIS/EIR. The Citizens Advisory Committee, appointed to work with staff and consultants on the public participation program for the LA/OMA Ultimate Solids Disposal Plan required by the Environmental Protection Agency, has been studying sludge disposal alternatives . The Committee is also assisting staff and our consultant in formulating written and audio/visual material to be used in presenting the Ultimate Solids Disposal Plan to the public . At the Board meetings , staff will update the Boards on the Committee 's activities and the schedule for review and approval of the EIS/EIR for the LA/OMA project. Nos . 12 and 13 : Report of the Executive Committee . The Committee met on September 28th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . Nos . 14 and 15 : Closed Session . The Boards will convene in closed session to consider a report from the Executive Committee and staff concerning upcoming salary and benefit negotiations with employee groups . DISTRICT NO. 2 No. 23 : Action re Annexation No . 53, Borrow Pit Annexation . The General Counsel is recommending an amendment to a December 13, 1982 agreement to defer annexation fees for proposed Annexation No. 53 . The amendment approves an exchange of security for a promissory note which is currently in default with a balance of $25 , 000 , plus $9, 040 accrued interest. Included in the agenda material is a memorandum describing the transaction . It is recommended that the amendment to the agreement be authorized as the General Counsel has concluded that there is no risk on the part of the District . DISTRICTS NO . 2, 3 AND 11 No . 24 : Actions Concerning EIR on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts No . 2, 3 and 11 . In July the Boards approved an agreement with Michael -9- 10/12/83 Brandman & Asociates for preparation of the EIR for the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts No . 2, 3 and 11 . The Draft EIR has now been completed and a copy is enclosed with the agenda package. The actions appearing on the agenda are the steps necessary at this time in accordance with the CEQA guidelines . DISTRICT NO. 1 No. 31 : Verbal Status Report re Implementation of Long-Range Financial Program. At an adjourned meeting on September 28th, the Board considered a report from the staff on the District 's long-range financial requirements and directed staff to proceed with planning for implementation of a special assessment ( use fee) to be collected on the property tax bill . Staff will present a verbal status report at the Board meeting on October 12th. Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH:JWS :ddk -10- AGENDA ITEM N0, 11 - ALL DISTRICTS October 5 , 1983 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Status Report on Activities of Citizens Advisory Committee for Ultimate Solids Disposal, October 4, 1983 Your Citizens Advisory Committee studying Ultimate Solids Disposal under the LA/OMA project has been meeting on a regular basis since July 19th . We have toured both Treatment Plants and have reviewed three of the four alternatives : the incorporation r.d of sludge with municipal solid waste at the County landfill, land composting and mechanical composting.. We will be studying co- combustion and other non-scope alternatives next week. On Saturday, October 1, we met all-day to develop the elements of the public participation program. Since the decision for a long-range environmentally safe alternative for handling the solid residue from the Districts ' Treatment Plants will not be easy and could involve large public expenditure, the Committee has concluded that it is essential that the public be involved in the decision-making process . The following are the recommenda- tions of the Committee for a public participation program: 1. Newspaper Insert. A descriptive, informational piece should be developed and placed in both the Sunday Register and Orange County Edition Los Angeles Times . The Committee strongly believes this to be the most effective way to reach the largest number of people. This insert will include a brief history of the Sanitation Districts and the LA/OMA project, a description of the alternatives , a schedule of public participation activities, including maps to workshops , and a questionnaire for citizens to express their concerns . Good readership of Sunday inserts has been confirmed by the Districts ' public relations- consultant, Len Scholl Co. , Inc. In addition, these can be overrun at a relatively low cost and used as handouts in the public workshops . -2- 2. Slide presentation . It was the concensus of_ the _ rou g p _ - -- - that a slide presentation incorporating much of the above information is a necessary part of the public participation process . After the November Board meeting, this vehicle will be used to address city councils, the Board of Supervisors, chambers - of commerce, homeowner associations, clubs and organizations,, as well as with workshops currently scheduled in January. 3 . Workshops . The Committee recommends that six workshops be presented in various areas of the County, with most focused toward the potentially=affected areas . The group envisions using a format which includes presentations of the various alternatives by Districts ' consultants and the Committee and responding to questions from the public. The main focus of the workshops will be to educate those in attendance in the public participation program. 4. Public Information Packet. Prior to publication of the newspaper insert, it will be necessary to prepare information to be used in conjunction with speaking engagements before clubs and organizations, etc . It will contain a brief history of the Sanitation Districts and the LA/OMA project, a description of the alternatives and a schedule of target dates in the public participation and EIS adoption phases of the project. lar,� 5. Government Information Packet. Materials will be prepared to assist the elected representatives in answering questions raised by their constituencies . These packets will include a brief history of the LA/OMA project, a chart showing the pros and cons and relative cost of each alternative, maps showing proposed project sites and the schedule for public participation activities and decision-making targets . Additionally, it will include the names of contact persons and locations where additional information may be obtained. The Citizens Advisory Committee is unanimous in its belief that the above-stated elements will help to assure positive participation on this project and requests the endorsement of the Boards of Directors for these activities . The present schedule calls for the drafts of these elements to be completed by October 25th for review by the Citizens Advisory Committee and by the Executive Committee on October 26th. A full presentation can be scheduled for the November Board meeting . Patrick W. McNelly, 9bairman Citizens Advisory Committee COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA92708 (714)540.2910 October 5, 1983 (714)982-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE September 28 , 1983 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Others present: Donald A. Holt, Jr . , Joint Chairman Director Henry Frese Richard B. Edgar , Vice Joint Chairman Director Don Saltarelli Robert Hanson Thomas L. Woodruff, General Bruce Finlayson Counsel Elvin Hutchison Don Smith Staff Present: Ruth Bailey Supervisor Harriett Wieder J. Wayne Sylvester , Assistant General Manager Absent: William H. Butler , Director of Finance Director Henry Wedaa William N. Clarke, Director Evelyn Hart Superintendent Thomas M. Dawes, Deputy Convene: 5: 30 p.m. Chief Engineer Adjourn: 7: 40 p.m. 1. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on September 26th and reviewed several matters. Committee Chairman Frese recommended the following items for consideraton by the Executive Committee. a. Revisions To Selection Committee Procedures. The Boards' Selection Committee Procedures that are used in evaluating and selecting professional engineers and architects provide for periodic review by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Any recommended changes are submitted to the Executive Committee. Chairman Frese reported that staff, following - consultation with the Joint Selection Committee, proposed revisions to the procedures and the Fiscal Policy Committee had reviewed the changes and recommends approval. E.C. 9/28/83 The Executive Committee considered the revised procedures and a flowchart describing the selection process, copies of which are enclosed, and concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee ' s recommendation that the revised procedures be adopted. b. Consultant For Telephone System Study. The Districts ' existing telephone system has reached capacity. Because of deregulation and the entry of many new equipment suppliers into the marketplace, along with significant technological advances, there are considerably more telephone system options available now than a few short years ago. Staff has advised that professional assistance to help in the planning, design, selection and installation of a new system to meet our needs for the next decade would be desirable and cost effective. The proposed work has been divided into two phases. During the first phase of the study, the consultants would review the Districts ' existing system, evaluate our long-term telecommunications requirements, design a system to meet these requirements, solicit and evaluate vendor proposals, and recommend selection of anew system. The second phase of the work would involve assistance in contract negotiations with the vendor and serving as the Districts' project manager for the installation, testing and acceptance of the new system. Three telecommunications consultants were interviewed. Enclosed is a table entitled Telephone System Upgrade Study Consultant Evaluation that outlines the manhours and costs proposed by the three firms to perform the study. The staff has recommended award of the study to Natel & Company of Orange on the basis of their understanding of the scope of the study, the experience and professionalism of the firm, favorable comments from reference checks of Natel ' s clients in the local area, and Natel ' s commitment of the required effort to the project which also reflects the most cost-effective and lowest man-hour rate. The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee concur with staff ' s recommendation. The efforts of the study team will be coordinated with the activities and plans developed by the Building Committee to ensure that the new system effectively serves the office expansion being planned by the Building Committee. E.C. 9/28/83 2. Personnel Matters. The Committee convened in closed session to discuss pending personnel matters with the Assistant General Manager . A report on upcoming salary negotiations with employee groups will be made to the Joint Boards in closed session at the October 12th meeting. Mr*T 8/OIA3 SELECTION COMMITTEE PROCEDURES 8/00/03 9/Ob/83 MW Omr wr IIIm SE[FYR'IQ8 LIST'OF FIIM'S 02*ff= gmunm O7BP I 6 FIRS wr I&MM awT FINALIZE W SEu@MQ4 SEIFI.TIOF E03M SODM S'R1FF S03EE NM AM Ft7<t sm" M=IM3 011aTm AGI Q7 FEVMf 6 ESP PInTwr �$IA,000 SE=CN IFP'S S� NFZC'S FEE BDAIFa ISSUE WIC MX FIE COMMEE M 3 W/EEST AIMI P.O. M NWO FIRS Q[A14iFIFD F IRI P BI MUCI 1 81A9 mmr IN PIC'. CF Pt�PA[ZE JQIIdM OR QlfF1I.IFI- ODNIa P RM OF C7ITIOB ODC'S GEN'L CIFC SERVICES BOAM AMH SESFTTIOF FOR SEL CCR4r E $I0,000 ca%m TD _ PIn7FY r t Trum CRIER I\TIOi SEFTVICE: IF UQ E �$10,000 M NMD SIAFF 0I0,000 PGR-1, m M SEMIS S'AEF tam'S WISH FICF 3 NEGO'S Me FIR1 QFKIF m FEE FIRS 6 NEW'S FM 91�1FF ISSME AGRJAFO t ' r 10/12/83 A POLICY OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY ESTABLISH THEE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES : Section 1. Selection of Engineering and Architectural Firms . In the selection of a consulting architect, or engineer and other related services as defined in Section 2, it mist--be rea3i2ed is recognized that no two individuals or firms er have equal training, experience, skill, capabilities or work loads to meet the demands of any contemplated project. There are—seven eas that w±±± be used in H2e Evaluation - o and selection of a consultant will include but not be limited to the following : A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, ' and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California. C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years ' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm' s staff must have at least five years ' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields , required by the project. E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm. _ F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local firm when more than one firm is being considered. G. A firm selected where the maximum fees are greater than -$10 , 000 must certify as to an affirmative action program. f "• Section 2. Definition of Engineering/Architectural Services . �.d A. Engineering or architectural services are those professional services associated with research, development, design and construction, alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically or justifiably perform, including studies, investigations , surveys , evaluations , consultations , planning, programming, conceptual designs , plans and specifications, cost estimates , inspections , shop drawing reviews , sample recommendations , preparation of operation and maintenance manuals , and other related services . B. Services covered hereunder include architectural, engineering, environmental and related services . C. An Engineer/Architect is an individual, partnership or corporation (or any combination thereof) engaged to provide services as defined in Section 2.A._ Section 3 . Scope of the Project . A. For every project approved by the Board(s ) and for which outside services are required, the staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of work . B. The scope shall define the extent of the services , the time required, and shall develop a maximum fee for the services sought. * scove of work shall be sub greater than . C. The maximum fee amount shall be kept confidential until a selection has been made, but, along with the scope of work, will be available to -HTe Board arembers any Director upon request. Section 4 . Selection of Firm. A. Projects where services are less than $10 ,000 . _ -2- 1. Projects where the maximum professional fees are less than $10,000 are usually �•.✓ specific, small projects normally requiring specialization in one or two fields of endeavor . 2. Staff shall consider at least three qualified firms and shall select that firm which appears best qualified for the project. 3 . Notwithstanding the_provisions of Section 4.A. 2, in the event the proposed work is considered continuation or specialized services as described in Section 5 , "Continuation of Services , " or Section 6, "Specialized Services, " upon written authorization by the General Manager , negotiations may be limited to the sole firm deemed desirable for providing said services . 4. Negotiations for compensation to for the firrm work shall be conducted between the -_______ firm and ±ham—orstricts Engilleer staff members appointed by the General Manager, or their designees . 5 . A requisition for acquisition of services shall be forwarded to the purchasing office listing the firms considered, the reasons for choosing the firm selected and shall certify that the negotiated fee for compensation to the weer firm is reasonable for the services requested and will not result in excess profits for the =__ma==___; firm. 6. The purchasing office shall process the requisition in accordance with the purchasing policy established by the Boards of Directors . 7. The evaluation of the cons?1haft's firm' s qualifications and the fee negotiations will not be made public but will be available to any Director upon request. -3- B. Projects where services are greater than $10,000 . 1. Public Notice. a. An adequate public notice shall be given by publication of a notice of request for proposals wh_eh shall appeae in professional journals or publications of general circulation . b. The a ______M___ notice shall request written preposals for statements of qualification only. C. In addition to the notice by publi- cation, the District shall maintain a list of qualified firms and notice of the request for proposals shall be mailed to those firms who have the capabilities and specialization to qualify for the project. 2. Screening Committee. A Screening Committee comprised of -at least a minimum of three staff members designated by the' General Manager shall select at least three firms who appear best qualified for the project. 3 . Proposals . a. Each se±ected firitt, Staff will prepare written requests for propo- sals setting forth the scope of work and other information necessary for the firm to properly prepare and submit a proposal. Proposals shall be solicited from the three firms deemed most qualified. b. Proposals submitted shall: (1) Acknowledge the scope of th-ise _ project and the extent of the services required. ( 2) shai±-s a buri-i—T= _ -=-=__ �!¢e-tie Include a state- ment of the f irm' s qualifica- tions for performing the proposed work . -4 ( 3) Include past performance records of the firm. ( 4) Demonstrate the firm's capabili- '"'� ties to complete the work within the time allotted. ( 5) Identify the specific key person- nel to be assignab! d to the project. ( 6) Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer . ( 7) e=d Provide any other information as may required to properly evaluate the firm's qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to the project. 4. Selection Committee . a. Joint Works . ( 1) The Selection Committee for Joint Works projects shall be comprised of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman of the Boards of Directors and a minimum of two staff members appointed by the General Manager, or their designees , for aeinb ftxkz Projects er his designee. ( 2) At the discretion of the Joint Chairman, additional Directors may be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for specific projects . b. Individual Districts . ( 1) Districts with three-member Boards : $r The Oishrich Selection Committee of a District with a three-member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman of the ±ndivitu District and a minimum of two staff members appointed by the General Manager, or their designees +r �..� and Hie-Bistx ict:s—ehie= -5- ( 2) Districts with more than a three member Board: The Selection Committee in the else of a District-a with more than a three �.d member Bireeters Board shall be comprised of the Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the irtdivid- tmk-1 District and a minimum of two staff members appointed by the General Manager, or their designees in the-ease-ef a ist.=tet pre-jeet an e his designee. 5. Negotiations - a. The Selection Committee shall review qualifications of each cansT ,T firm with due con- sideredation sh-11 b-- listed in order of location, reputation , experience, financial standing, size, personnel availability, quality of references , estimated fee for services to be per- formed and work load and other fac- tors peculiar relevant to the project �..✓ being considered. b. The Selection Committee, upon comple- tion of their evaluation, shall rank the firms considered in order of desirability. C. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following will be strictly adhered to: 1. Invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Selection Committee. 2. The errgi-n-cer firm shall present, in writing, to the Selection Committee, a proposal for fees associated with the services . This The proposal for compensation shall be pre- sented in sufficient detail inr wider T to enable the Selection Committee iar to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the eg-inner firm has thoroughly identified the efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work required. -6- 3. The basis of the fee shall be: cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem rate( s ) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum (fixed) fee . 4. If it is the decision of the Selection Committee to use ether methods for compen- sation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this deci- sion shall be made by the Selection Committee in their recommendation to the Board(s ) of Directors , for the censultineg services . 5. The Selection Committee shall review the com- pensation requested by the =o firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. 6. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Board(s ) of Directors, shall be certified by the Selection Committee and approved by General Manager as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive pro- fits for the _______t____ firm. 7. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the seeend next-ranked firm. 8. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one eens ' t__� firm be discussed with another . Section 5 . Continuation of Services . A. In some instances zasres, where a consaitirrg firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board( s) determine that it might be is in the+r best interests of the District( s ) to retain Hiss the same firm for sub- sequent phases of related work v+th-it. the ______=(_ ) , then the Selection Committee may be authorized to c n proceed directly with the nego- tiations with that firm for the additional work. B. This weuld be particularly trme This situation may arise when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a master plan report and the services -es -7- previded for 4-ft said repert work are satisfactory to the Board( s ) their and the procedure of examining other eense tants firms for subsequent phases weld is not deemed ire necessary. and the _______ .. a with the negetiatiens C. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be reeehed concluded under these cir- cumstances , theft negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply. Section 6. Specialized Services . A. In the event that the Bistriet( s) specialized services are required where it is determined that only one individual or firm can best perform the services _=_ Ileeds of the = __=;_ ; for a specific project, the ehief Bngin� .' the case where the-4e e are less than $Ie , 600, err the Selection Committee, in the case when where the aca�r=nr�m fees are greater than $10 ,000 , will report to the Board(s ) tts said findings and request \MO✓ authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm. or individual. B. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board( s) of Directors for consideration. if an agreeruent is not: reached, hhe negaltialtions shall be t:erminat:ed and nermetl preettrement: shall: be initiated for the- re-quired prefessiene! Section 7. Agreement for Ertyineeritvj. and w__`________ Services . A. Upon approval by the Board( s ) of a negotiated agreement for services , a contract shall be exe- cuted in a form approved by the General Counsel. B. The contract shall include: 1. meter A statement of the scope of the project. we-31 defined and the -8- 2. " The basis and individual elements of the eg�-- fees are we l defined, fee-,-eel plus - -imed--fee with pee them rates with a maieiatm eeatEaet shall be £ettse-1. 3. The eg-reemenle basis for payment to the Bert- n firm an t ! bastes = _a s- - ____ -y the 4. The time limits in which the services must be performed. S. The agreement sheeld Provi-desions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. 6. If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits , the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such non-performance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee . 7. The firm shall be required to carry errors and omissions insurance coverage in an amount determined appropriate by the Selection Committee for the project. 8. Any other provisions deemed necessary or desirable. C. Progress payments made to the censulte_= firm during the time the services are being supplied shall be on the work completed to date, as recommended by the responsible staff member . if it is bile Of the Selectien ecamibbee ho tiens for this decision shall be rnede by the Seleetieit'-eefl!mi t tee in their r eeemme dari erg—;e Beard(s ) of Bireelters for the eensultin'. Section 8. Conflict of Interest. �..✓ A. The District( s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code which governs the performance of its officers, -9- employees or agents in the conduct of project work, including procurement. B. No officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from potential candidates . C. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District(s ) Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified. Section 9. Term of Selection and PremAnt--R74effsedures . Effective Dates and Revision Procedure. A. This policy shall become effective on ftpril N, 1982, and B. The" procednres policy may be modified from time to time as necesary to best meet the needs of the District( s) . C. The Policy shall be reviewed periodically, as necessary, but no later than twenty-four months from the effective date, by the Fiscal Policy Committee for recommendation to the Executive Committee of the Board(s ) of Directors . -10- TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE STUDY CONSULTANT EVALUATION Firm/ Phase I Phase II Total Average Location Manhours/Costs Manhours/Costs Manhours/Costs Hourly Rate Natel & Company 130 / $7,500.00 155 / $ 8,500.00 285 / $16,000.00 $ 56.14 Orange American Telephone 140 / $9,000.00 200 / $12,500.00 340 / $21,500.00 $ 63.24 Management Institute Irvine Lynch Young & Associates 75 / $5,870.50 75 / $ 5,625.00 150 / $11,495.50 $ 76.64 Newport Beach RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS OCTOBER 12, 1983 - 7:30 P.-M. ram- I ,i FUND NO 4199 - JT DiST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 9/02/83 PAGE 1 I � ----.. - ---- - -- -- -._.REP.ORT NUMBER_.APh3_. _.. . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PbID 09/07/93 i ----------- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 065474 ACME_ MEDI_CAL SUPP-4].ES___ E2.71.32EJRSLAJ-D_SUPQLI ES. _ ..___._ __... .__ .. . 065479 ADVANCED OFFICE SERVICES $39.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 06547E ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS• INC. $156.930.93 CONTRACTOR P2-27 065477 AIR PR_OD_U__CTS_& CHEMICALS --INC. .__-.4338.11-____ SPEW-ALTIL GASES_-______-.__ 06547P DE8RA E. ALLEN $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE m ^65479 AMERICAN AIR FILTER• INC. $35.11 kELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Z G65480 AMERICAN. COMPRESSOR .CO d 065481 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION S1.400.00 CSDOC N7 REPAIRS ocz. 065482 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.463.03 PUMP PARTS H 0654P3 APCO VALVE R PRIMER C0RP__.. -_.. __ _. . _.__ _�15.5•.7 _.__.___�-VALVE_SllPPL1ES.__. __-_____ .__ ._ 465484 APPLIED FILTRATION $213.40 PIPE SUPPLIES f�1 ^6`_.485 A9UA BEN CORP. $19.129.81 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 3 965486 ARROWHEgD_ELECjR ELECTRICAL--SUPPLIES------- - -- -- C65487 B&B TRUCKS $318.00 TRUCK PARTS co 2654RA dACHARACH INST. CO. $88.51 PUBLICATIONS 065489 MARGARET BAILEY - __420s00 __C-IT_1ZENS_-ADV-IS0RY. C OHM LTTEE_. ...__. . . . ....._ 1 0f54clC BAKER PLYWOOD C O.. INC. $570.48 SMALL HARDWARE 065491 ED REROM $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE r 0(Ir49? 9=VC0 ___-_$_652.a88___-__ELECM.C_CAR.T_PAR.TS-_.--._-._... ._---- I-- C65493 DIG BOX RENTAL f.O. $69050.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 065494 BLAKE• MOFFITT & TOWNE 5905.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES d 065495 BOMAR..MAGNET D_-SERVICE - _ I NC. _--_----- -- -- _-----.-- --S89Q-..52-___._.__-ENGLIIE-PABTS___-- � 665496 BORDEN METAL PRODUCTS• INC. S1.387.00 SMALL HARDWARE - -I - 65497 BRENNER-FIELDER & ASSOC.• INC. $53.02 FREIGHT :Z7 9654914 STEVE 9UBAL0_ CON$TR.I�CjJON-CQ. _ _ ._$24.5 .-.Z7.72 _____�_CSDOL--#5-EMERGENCY- REPAIRS n ^E5499 BURKE CONCRETE ACCESSORIES $52.62 BUILDING MATERIALS C6550G CPT CALIFORNIA• INC. $5,936.10 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES C/) 065501 CAL-GLASS FOR_RESEARCH• INC._ _.. S127.87 __-WELDING__SUPPLIES 365502 CAL SOUTH EGUIPMENT CO. 1446.20 TRUCK REPAIRS n6`_503 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY $5.482.44 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 06`504 JOHN_CAROLL4_ENGINEER _- ._$60.737.19-.__ _______..ENGR._..J-_15._.P1c.20,_ P2c2571A. C65505 JOHN CAROLLO ENG % GREELEY HANSEN $1.715.21 CONSTRUCTION P2-23, TRAINING P2-23 065506 CARUS CHEMICAL CO.• INC. $326.97 FEEDER RENTAL 965507 CHRIS CERVELLONE - $375.00 __. CSDOC_d13.-FORMATION STUDY 065501, CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES• INC. $279487.57 FERRIC CHLORIDE 065539 MANUEL CID $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE r'65510 CLA-VAL COMPANY- -- _ E19989.4.7_-- .- _- --_--VALVES_-__.. ..._. _ 965511 CLARK DYE HARDWARE $27.44 SMALL HARDWARE 065512 DAVID J. CLINE S20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE PG5513 COAST FIRE ECUIPMENT $455.90. - _. _ FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE _.. 965514 COAST SWEEPING. INC. $380.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 0E5511, COLT DRAPERY SERVICE 1598.00 DRAPERY CLEANING 065516 EDWARD F. COLBURN $20.00 -. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065517 CONROCK COMPANY $528.56 BUILDING, MATERIALS C6°518 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $706.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06r510 CONSTRUCTION TOOL E THREADING. $67.31 WELDING.SUPPLIES s; j .4 V,, FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/02/83 PAGE 2 -- .. - ----- - ---- -- - --. - ----- - ---- --._ REP.ORI- UHHER..AP43- _-- - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 065520 CONTINENTAL. CHEMI-CgL_C0.__-____ ---____- . __ _.-._323s65fa.D2,__--CULQ.RIHE. __--•--- . _ -- ---_-. ._ 065521 CONTROL CABLES♦ INC. S123.45i. CABLES 065522 CONTROLCO $395.18 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 065523 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES__--_ ___._...._ . _ .E19533.25.__ ^65524 MR. CRANE 120003.50 CRANE RENTAL m 065525 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $21.70 a WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 065526 UNiVERS1..T r 9F.-CALZ-EQ2N1A ----3BA-1 OURVLERys€AYIC,E.S ------... - - 065527 M.A. DAHL $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065528 DAILY PILOT $19635.05 LEGAL ADVERTISING, 065529 DANIELS--TIRE_SERVICE _•_ _ _ - _.. _ _ ._ a476,32 TRUCK TI.RES __ . �-� 065530 DECO 153.67 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES m065531 DELPHI SYSTEMS* INC. $2O117.50 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES C65532 D 0 R A D 0 FN.TERP[ISF.�St--LHSt--------._•---..----------_11.9.1ELO.1D PLANL#1BER9.1R5...__.--------.---._ -- 065533 DONN EDWARDS CORP. $892.78 PAINT SUPPLIES 065534 E.D.A.WOINC. & K.P. LINDSTROM $29495.64 EIR ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL 00 065535 E-Z LAMINATING CO- _._.`. E51�94UFFICESUPPLIES.•_____.____.._ 1 065536 EASTMANO INC. E2O082.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065537 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $44.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Z'y 065536 _ ENC•HANTERt-I-NC._----- ----__-___ �.3�.50Ils_OR _OCEAN MONITORING-------_-------____-_-.-__ r 065539 FAR UES7 TERMITE &PEST CONTROL $520.00 PEST CONTROL 06554^ FIBRE GLASS-EVERCOAT CO.O INC. $185.88 PAINT SUPPLIES d 065541 rILTER SUPPLY CO. .114310-7 .._ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0---4 069542 FISCHER Cc PORTER CO. 1439.60 PIPE SUPPLIES C/) 06554' FLAT & VERTICAL CONCRETE $400.00 BUILDING MATERIALS 065544 CITY_OF__FOUNTAIN VALLEY_____.____-___ __ .. E6�4...86-_-. WATER USEAGE ^65545 GANAHL LUMBER CO. -- -- --- - --- - -- - -- - S2O383.31 BUILDING MATERIALS C7 065546 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S612.48 TELEPHONE 065547 GIERLICH-MITCHELL• INC. $52t234.51 PRESS BELTS, SPEC. P-056 C65548 DAVID A. GOOF 520.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065549 LARRY HALLOS $121.90 TRUCK REPAIRS 065550 HARBOR .TOWING. T133.00 TOWING__.. .. __.___...-__. 065551 CHARLES G- HARDY• INC. $216.40 BUILDING MATERIALS 065552 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 1276.45 PIPE SUPPLIES 06555! MICHAEL HEINZ $81.00 ._ ... _ . - EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 065554 HOLCHEMO INC. $29300.00 CAUSTIC SODA 065555 HOLMES MINI TRUCK DISMANTLERS 111918.60 TRUCK PARTS 965556 HOUSE -_OF_BATTERIES BATTERIES -.. - $135-11 - - .... 065557 HUNDLEY COMPANYO INC. S19263.65 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C65558 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $4.581.12 WATER USEAGE 065559 HUNTINGTON PEACH RUBBER STAMP 136.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065560 ICC INSTRUMENT $25.81 - - LAB REPAIRS 065561 INGRAM PAPER S1036.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 965562 INSTRUMENT SOCIETY, OF••AMERICA 199.30.. _PUBLICATION AT 065563 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE $228.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065564 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $3.50 WATER USEAGE 065565 JOHNSON CONTROLS* INC. $89.85 THERMOSTAT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/02/83 PAGE 3 ---- REPORT NUMBER NUMBER_ARA.3--- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 • WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - - ---- �• 065566. _•- zLPBlk-P. JQRQA _-_`___S2O.00- CITIZENS ADV-I-SOR`-COMMMTEE-- -- 065567 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $333.01• BEARING SUPPLIES �`' I• 065568 KENNEDY PIPELINE CO. $49001.74 CSDOC 95 EMERGENCY REPAIRS 065569 2] BEAFLJNGUPRU.ES ._._ K NI G BEARINGI INC. 5934. 0655T0 KIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS $10 11.90 PUMP PARTS 065571 KLEEN-LINE CORP $492.91 4 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Q6557.2 KOHL'S HALLMARK CENTER _ S73,Ali nEE_ICF SIIPPI IFS 065573 L.B.W.S.t INC. $330.13 WELDING SUPPLIES i 065574 LAURSEN COLOR LAB $105.74 FILM PROCESSING -_ 065575 _ - K.P. LINDSTROM 8 ASSOCI• ATES_ S2t6O0„g.4 QrFAN WAIVER RFSPnNSF --_---_.,,__••__.___ 065576 LOS ANGELES CHEMICAL CO. $19664.20 HERBICIDES I Iff 065577 LOS ANGELES TIMES S19500.80 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 065578-- ---d9fl2LQ-J3LQNElf- f20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMKITTEE- -.----. ._- . I 065579 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $19300600 CSDOC #3 REPAIRS _ 065580 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $22.94 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ---_065581.__--------GEORGE- MASON- --- _S?�r �00 C-Ut7FNS_ADVIS.ORY CDHM.I_.IEE- -.-._._... . 065582 MATT - CHLORt INC. S469.16 PIPE SUPPLIES 065583 PATRICK MCNELLY $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE j _--Q65584 GEQHGE MI.LL.-ER_ CoNSTRUc7IoN E_117013.70 CONIRQGTOR 065505 MITCHELL MANUALSt INC. $47.40 PUBLICATION 065586 H. MITLO $19350.00 TRUCK PARTS sLBI-&30; _ELELIR.LGAL-SUPPU.FS 065588 ADORE PRODUCTS CO. S321.91 VALVES SUPPLIES 065589 JERRY L. MORRIS• M.O. $75.00 MEDICAL EXAMINATION MY_EQ_I_NQUS_I.R1E3 '82.16 SNALA HARDWARE__ 065591 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $15.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065592 OCEAN SALT CO.t INC. $599975 SALT 065593 - __ORANGE_-VALVE_g_FITTING C0.`__ 065594 COUNTY OF ORANGE S19598039 TESTING P2-25-1A, PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS I' 065595 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $39666.52 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND 065596---------fG_1NQu1RIES AM-S,UPPJL IFS 065597 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $268.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065598 PACIFIC TELEPHONE S121.53 TELEMETERING 065599 _ _--_-_ PALMER, BLDG.-.-SYSTEM__-CQ9pv_ --__.•_,_____-___.____ _-..---__-_-..$1t98.1.00- -RLAN-T'-#-2__CONTROL-BUILDING ENCLOSURES 065600 PAMECO-AIRS $88.14 PIPE SUPPLIES 065601 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS S382.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - -065602 TRUCK-PARTS - ---- --- ;;� 065603 POSTMASTER $19000600 POSTAGE 065604 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $60.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE 065605 QUALIFIED ELECTRIC SUPPLY _ �T99tgG_-_ E-LE�181fA!�Sjl�P.a.1.E-� Q65606 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONA! TRUCKS 5112.78 TRUCK PARTS j 065607 THE REGISTER S948.64 LEGAL ADVERTISING • __ _ 0656.08 ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO. 17 EL�MaUL-S.URELJE ----__---_._._.-_ 065609 RUSSCO CONSTRUCTIONt INC. $539921.25 CONTRACTOR 5-18R f • 065610 RYAN-HERCO S19.66 FREIGHT V65611 _ SAM♦ INC. _ ._.. ._. ... ..- - --_. .._ 4t2.79_e26---_•__._---WI RE-SUPPLY------------- --- _ _--------- --- --- t l 1 EE 11 NGG pp EE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PE�FR�SNURBPRTAP43/02/83 PAGE 4 COUNTY SANLIAIION OTSTRICTS OF ORANSE-Z.01INTV CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR __..-JIliDUHT DESLrt1_2I10 ---- 065612 SANCON INC. •$159359.50 CONTRACTOR 1-811-1 , 3-23R 065613 SA_ 0 DQLLAR BUSINESS FORMS s67.A4 nrFIrF DORMS 165614 SANTA ANA BLUE PRINT CO. s384.25 BLUEPRINTING 065615 SANTA ANA OATSUN s272.83 TRUCK PARTS • 065616 _-_ SANTA ANA ELM"C HOURS s6.11183L"4 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 065617 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION AGENCY sIr200.00 1983-84 MEMBERSHIP I: 1 065618 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S3r366.07 TOOLS !II 065619 J.P•. SIEFEN 120-On 'kC1T17FNs Anvil RY-COMllJSTEE 71 065620 PHIL SMITH $2D.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065621 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $915.58 OFFICE FURNITURE I 065622 SOUTHERN CALIF. EOISON CO. 12A7sZBZ..bB POIFR -.- --- �065623 SO CALIF ENERGY COALITION AND E.S.C.O. , INC. s2r560.00 ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT PARTICIPATION • Q65624 S0. CALIF. WATER CO. s11.00 WATER USEAGE 065625 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. x6s16R.65 DIF-Fl FUEL - --- 065626 SPIRAL BINDING CO.* INC. S167.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES r 065627 SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO. $19530.20 PIPE SUPPLIES 065628 STAROW STEEL $3- .62 sTFF1 sTnrK _ 065629 - -- THE SUPPLIERS $367.48 TOOLS 065630 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER 1968.96 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT i 1 _ 065631 _-_ TAK TAKAMINE S450.00 PIANT 14AINTFNANf F 065632 TENTRONIXr INC. $542.58 PIPE SUPPLIES 065633 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $29104.66 PAINT SUPPLIES __a 6563 4 _ THREE M CO. s65.00 OFFICE SUPPLIFS� 065635 -- TRANS-AMERICA DELAVALr INC. S19276.74 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �. 065636 TRANSAMERICA DELAVALr INC. $21.10 FREIGHT ___ 065637 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLYs INC. S113,gAA93 TRUCK PARTS 065638 U.S. AUTO GLASSr INC. S190.65 TRUCK REPAIRS 065639 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $105.27 DELIVERY SERVICE 065640 ______ __ YWR SCIENTIFIC t1.t463.sf� LA9-SllP 11115 ------ 065641 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. i228.96 PIPE SUPPLIES I. 065642 VALVE 8 STEEL SUPPLY CO. $487.60 VALVES - 065643 VAUGHANsS INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO -;1iQT$iB0 -EHCi1.NF-aEFA_LR i 065644 -- WARREN & BAILEY - $266s59 PIPE SUPPLIES 065645 CARL WARREN 8 CO. S48.96 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR • 065646 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER _.S_/5g1_t52- �N.GIRE 065647 - WAX SHOP 5410.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 065648 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF S19253.50 LEGAL SERVICES --_065649 - _ WORD INFORMATIONr INC. r _sqllkkfL0 OFF SUPPLIER _UPPLIES_,-- ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 -_$9049656.24 14 „ y .. I lJ1 I j PROCESSING DATE 09/02/83 PAGE 5 FUND NO 9199 - DIST WORKING CAPITAL REPORT NO AP43 UUNTT—SANtTATCO-N -IT1STRlrTT—QF—UAARCE—COUNTY — — --— - �. CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 C ` SUMMARY — AMOUNT— — -- —^ — (. : #2 OPER FUND $ 1 ,468.17 N3 OPER FUND 7.903.72 . —`— l5—UPER—FUND -- --- 0—,63 ---------._...--- ( CC #5 ACO FUND 53,921 .25 rn #6 OPER FUND 1 .639.74lk 7-0PE R—FUND— —1 .3-UO — —_--- i l= 911 OPER FUND 1 ,864.00 D N13 ACO FUND 769.25 -#566-OPER--FUND' 5D — ------ ( #667 OPER FUND 3,006.88 m JT OPER FUND 382,403.01 CO R F --- , ( SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 67.96 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 3,666.52 — jT—WORKING—CAPITA1-FUND 36 Tom CLAIMS PAID 091071 f � c ( l�J! -- ------- -- - ---- ----- - S. to ,y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/08/83 PAGEREPORT 1 — — -WF 3 { COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08/83 { WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT —^ DESCRIPTION �6"5b50—""'7t2f Y-E:L�YTS— $ s 8.95 ERRED-COHPERSATION-PAYMENT ----------------�. -..... ' q. _ --SUMMARY.--.— -- -- -- {OU ------- C. -J .-WORK I NG-CAPITAL-FUN .g --- —" " QQ._ _._--TOTAL_CLAINS-PAI.D-09/-O$LQi_ Anaal&95 ( 1 rn • r f { ' u) I I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/19/83 PAGE 1 ° --R E-R p-43-- ----— COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (� CLAIMS PAID 09/21/83 I• WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT — DESCRIPTION - — 1• 65fi6fl n-1 nURc RIES - ��Q�g4_ LANDSCAP-I-NG-SUPPLt-E-S- -- 065669 ABC LUMBER CORP. S6.232.80 LUMBER I• 065670 A.S.U. $259.25 LAB SUPPLIES 0.65621-- apynNCo CGN.S_TBLLCIDRS•-]AIL. - -----S1D6,•210.�4 —CON-TRACTOR--P-2=,2-7- 065672 WAYNE W. AEGERTER $10.40 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE n65673 AIR PROCUCTS & CHEMICALS• INC. $7.268.95 VXYGEN PLANT EQUIPMENT --'-- - - -- _ _--1Ib.5�Z9 ALLLARS_OLI-r PARTS_ t1.7-9-.BA TRU_C-K-RART_S C65675 ALLIED SUFPLY CO. $206.70 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065676 AMERICAN PNEUMATIC TOOL CO $108.99 TOOL REPAIRS � -_._QESSI-L .Id E.�fILHIlR�9 c.ti1.14L•-c 0. --- —.-- t y a.g0 —R UM!'a ART-S-. --- --------- ---- ---- I 06567R ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES $125.00 TOWEL RENTAL 06`1679 AQUA BEN CCRF. $28.595.24 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS !' -r-6Ju ARRLLIUF.E CCNrRFTF PRnf]-a INC $190.80 81I-1-6D-I-NG-MATfiRIALS --- - -- KATHY 0656@1 ACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE 5171.50 DEVICE TESTING - - '- - 06�68?. K BARBCUR 529.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE i___Qfis6al___9TE.9LY_ &p_SSQCIAnSA_jXC. --S.5511 -0.0 WORKE.RS!COMP,--ADMI_N-4STRA70R (16`6P4 POP.OS AIR CONDITIONING $70.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 065E85 FICHAEL BRANDMAN 8 ASSOC.•INC $2.531.49 MASTER PLAN EIR-CSDOC 92.3,11 PRISTOL PARK MFDL AI GRP_. INC s65.00 PRE--EMPIOVMEN7-EXAMS- -- - ;� 065667 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS•INC $268.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 065608 BURKE CONCRETE ACCESSORIES 562.33 BUILDING MATERIALS EL'S1�ES�$_fB9EESSICNAL - xtTp_.Iln cEH.LNAII-RE&LST.RATION.------------- - :,-, 065690 CALIF. ASSCC. CF SAN. AGENCIES $440.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION It - P65691 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL $162.09 PIPE SUPPLIES � TRUCK Ig n i F c.-I1L-- S 6"2 T RUCK-PARTS --- -------_ ----- ;'� 065693 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $80.372.90 ENGR. PI-20, J-15 P65654 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S1.541.97 ENGR. P2-27, ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL 06564�---.-----------LHRLS__�EfiYEL.LONF_-..------ ------- -----Sfl25�80.----_----CSDOC_ff-1-3-.FO-RMATION_STUDY_---_----.-----._....- --- C65696 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES• INC. $7.644.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE 065697 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. 58 047.66 GASOLINE -L6.5L98-__- C-QASI-JA.SIIRANL-E-AG_LN.CY - _1633.-00 I-NSU RAN CE_ P R E M I UM ---------------------- ---- - 065699 COMPRESSOR & INDUSTRIAL $500.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS I" 065700 CONROCK COMPANY E249.74 BUILDING MATERIALS 06 _CQNS.CL.ICAI.ED_ELEC.TP.I.GAL-CIS_.—_.--_--.-_-_ ___--__536-0-.8fl------------.-ELECTRICAL-.SUPPLIES. . I' � 065702 CONSCLICAIEC REPRODUCTIONS E3.697.11 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION P657#13 CCNTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $19.280.34 CHLORINE "�----0fz_UA4__ L0INl_Y_LH➢LESAl.E_ El ECLL'1L_—_- s3Z2. 7_ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES--------------------._-- "� 065705 COUPTON & ASSOCIATES $5.250.00 MASTER PLAN EIR-CSDOC #1 ,6,7 C65706 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $163.30 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 065707 LARRY CURTI TRUCK_& EQUIPMENT _-- E3-*.6U&_72--_.-.__-_TRASH_DJSP.0SAL_._-._.______._.--_.._- 065708 STATE. CC CALIFCRNIA $20.00 ANNEXATION 193 PROCESSING FEE ! C6570° DECKER INSTRUMENT SUPPLY CC. $549.31 PRESSURE GAUGES I ----...CStF314-- NCO -- ------ ----- -- ----._514.84— ELEC.TRI.CAL-SUPPLIES-- ---.-.---. - ------- .. ' 06E711 DISCO FRINT COMPANY $1.127.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES Z 065712 DORACO ENTERPRISES• INC. S3.744.47 CONCRETE REMOVAL • 065723- _ -___-OIjNN ECG,AR_CS..CORP. __. ______._______-____.__. -_____-_.._ -_E3.•425..18. _ ._-_.-....-FAINT 5UPP-LIES..__ I I.. ----- - --- -- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/19/83 PAGE 2 L -- REPOR•T-NUMBER-ARA3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , � CLAIMS PAID 09/21/83 �• WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION -- EIMCC. PRO cc F11111P, Cn. _ __1$02_nn 0Ff_tDE_SUPPL-IES--- -- �' 065715 EAGLE SUPPLY OF CALIF. E916.44 PIPE SUPPLIES 065716 EASTMAN• INC. $717.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1• QEe57.13--- _EATON CORP. - --E3•S38-qf- _ W.I.RE _--_-.---- _ 965718 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. E1.041.37 PIPE SUPPLIES ; 065719 FCOTFILL CARDEN EGUIPMENT $45.80 I!ANDSCAPING SUPPLIES FCUNTAIA VAl-LFY APERA f17.70 F4Ll4_.P-ROLESS-ING- - - "d 065721 THE FOXBORO COMPANY $509.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 165722 FRANCE CCMFRESSOP PRODUCT $277.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS 0 - _v-. FRUIT GROL.FRS LABORATORY INE. 126 -0s- 1A6_-ANALYSIS - "I�-C65724 CITY OF FULLER70N $201.70 WATER USEAGE - "�IT 065725 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC. $79732.93 TELEPHONE _J16_U2fi__ �EGIH�D•-LICE. $993-31 PAGER-REPAIRS - - "' 065727 GLENDON CCKPANY $361.07 PIPE SUPPLIES 065728 GEORGE T. HALL CO. $31.10 VALVE SUPPLIES +„i 00 + i__----04v,72° HA R]tSLPPlY-Cf. _-A929_91 - SMALL HARDWA$F 1 065730 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $207.53 PIPE SUPPLIES 065731 HERTZ CAR LEASING $327.54 VEHICLE LEASING 2 HODfi.SON ELECTRIC a7a6-50 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS - Fir 065734 YYORCTEXON SUPPLY E25.18 SMALL HARDWARE 1 3344.29 LAB SUPPLIES i �t=:'-- S4..5.I3F -INGLFAF,-EB- S1,DHZ.31 -JAN-LT-OR.LAL-SUPP_L-IE-S- ---- -------- ^65736 IhT•L.TVREACED PRCDUCTS• INC. $579.24 WELDING SUPPLIES :. 065737 :NTEROX AF!ER1CA S1.434.00 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE -S.E.5I.38 F�AI7ILPLRFARINGg R SUPPI Y _ 113.55 BEARIN"UP,P-L4ES- i"f�--� 065739 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE Co. $192.16 TOOLS - C-) 065740 KING BEARING* INC. S1.426.85 BEARING SUPPLIES •' -.._.4E5711-_- _ KI.RS-1.T_U14 P _I1A.Ct1JN.E IJUKS-_ -----__$.196 I6_-- PUMP-PART.S-=----- -----------..---•-------- ----- i L'65742 KLEFN-LINE CORP $31.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 065743 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES SQ6.46 SMALL HARDWARE I" 0(LL794 L.P�JI.S.st 1N.E.__ -.._ -S1Db.01 WELD-ING-SURPL-I-ES- ---- I�� ?65745 LAURSEN CCLOR LAB $695.14 FILM PROCESSING ii (165746 LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORS• INC. $559.30 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 46.5_I9.Z--._----.-1�LNCQLrLfItiGg.__C4.._�E_EAL1E. ----- _3169_.5n COMP.RESSOR._P-ARTS---.•---•-_--_ - _---___ ,I 06574L' LONG BEach SAFETY COUNCIL $75.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 065749 LCNG PEACE SANDBLASTING CO. $1e608.75 SANDBLASTING tfi�1�Il_. ICIiWRV R AcSfS_LAIEs 13.9-2Oa-00 -ENGR�-2-40�IA,-2-�3r-�-21+r-�-23;-3-21I-2;3-24-1 065751 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $120.80 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065752 MASTER ELLEFRINT R SUPPLY $16.98 BLUEPRINTING 065753 MATT - CHLCR+ INC. 4.7.8LL T24.80..`a3 p-1-PE- SURR�I-ES-••----•----------------- 065754 PAUL A. NITCHE ^- EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 065755 H. PITLC $795.00 TRUCK PARTS ^_6'75 LEILATOR COMPANY 065757 NATIONAL CHFHSEARCH - -- $1b2.32 --EL-EVA'FOR-MAa-NTENANGE ------ - °• SUPPLIESLAB C--) 065756 NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY 5564.29 SMALL HARDWARE .. ----P65759-- -__ C1TY_OF_PiEl+f OR.T _E!EACH- ----------- ------- _4.4.,�9- ---WATER-USEAGE- -- ----- - - -- --- -- ----- --- ;;` ,. N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/19/83 PAGE 3 °L-PLORI AIUI+ID- "P43 -•-- ----•--- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' CLAIMS PAICI 09/21/83 WARRANT NC. VENDOR - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION n65-IFn r.DUNTY r.F rRANZE S62.85 - 065761 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19585.30 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND 065762 FANECO-AIRE $192.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -_R65Zb3_ PARTS LINL1NiTFQ --.._-x902.64-. ?R11CK-P-ARTS- ° rn 069764 PEAT• NARWICK• MITCHELL & CO. 1139211.00 k'ANNUAL AUDIT Ej Z 065765 POLY FABRICS $85.70 PIPE SUPPLIES 0657(16 IIARGLA EP.INRnSE ICE S60-.-0-0 'HOUSFRI-AL--WASTE-SAMPL-LNG-.4CE----- ------ r 065767 R. J. W. CCKSTRUC71CN CO., INC 1219260.62 RETENTION PW-085 065768 P.AIN806 DISPOSAL CO. $334.00 TRASH DISPOSAL " AOu62_--_- THE REGISTER . 55a.7.51- I FrAL-ADV.E-RI1S-I.NG-----._- 06L•770 REPUBLIC ENGINES $309.66 TRUCK REPAIRS-" 3 065771 ROBBINS & NEYERS $19536.58 PUMP PARTS �65272 crHnl L & Cr. ADyER7ISING 5328.00 UL7-I-MATE-S-OL4-DS--.0-1-SR-OSAL- PURL I C PART I C I PAT LON 065773 SHALLER & LOHRo INC. $49782.00 ENGR. 5-18R 065774 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $19063.20 TOOLS 0b:3-I.S. sQUIHEFd.-f.ALIF_ FniSnN cO. t88ab52..95 POWER - D n65776 SO CALIF ENERGY COALITION ANC ESCO, INC. $29048.00 ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT, PLANT. #2 "Ir 065777 SO. CAL. GAS CC. 1219318.87 NATURAL GAS 6.jI78 SOUIHFRN COI1NTIFS niI rn_ t12.660.20 ^I.ESFI Fiore ( '• d 065779 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER S948.50 BOTTLED WATER '• � 965780 STAROW STEEL $168.12 STEEL STOCK I 0.6�18.1 «IPFR CLEC_C_ORP 163A_.n0 CHEJU-CALS ------ ---____v 065782 THE SUPPLIERS $456.36 SMALL HARDWARE 065783 SYBRON - CASTLE S194.00 LAB MAINTENANCE � Ch57P4 d- WAYNF '�Y"f.SlER -S19,A9.2...95---- -R-E-TM.CASK-REIMBURSEMENT----_ 065785 THCMPSOK LACQUER CO. $109.87 PAINT SUPPLIES -__ 065786 TRUCK & ALTO SUPPLY, INC. $380.27 TRUCK PARTS •�-----9 6.51EL 1UAFSAI FS---- -._-^ 13.9A..02 PIPE-SURPL-I-ES-..-.-- --•.---..-_.__..._..._._------. •-- -- ' f 065788 UNILOC $461.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ,. } 065789 UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. $105.46 GASOLINE U N ITE D_EABSE LSEB3LI c r - U-7-88 D E LI_VBRY__.S.E R 11-I CE- ------ ----•_ _- 06E791 UNIVERSITY OF TOLECC $430.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 065792 UNIVERSITY SALES & SERVICE 1182.88 TRUCK PARTS ---3132.4Q LAB-SUP-P-LIES--- - ------------------..�---- 065794 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $322.58 PIPE SUPPLIES ^6�795 VALVE a STEEL SUPPLY CO. $513.57 VALVES 065756 JUN R. LAFLES- 13-7-6-.4O ODOR CONSULTANT-- -- - 065797- WARREN & BAILEY $140,59 PIPE SUPPLIES 065798 THOMAS L. LOODRUFF $12*369.50 LEGAL SERVICES 065799 --_- XEROX _CCRF. 2-t B5.Z.7A XEROX-REP_R0.DU_C_TJQN.-..- _---.-- -- - ----------------- - ••�_ - TOT AI CLAIMS RAt0_A)3/21LE3_---- 560a3J5.9.0- __.---- ----.-- ------ FUND NO 9199 - DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE__q/19/83 PAGE REPORT NO AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' — CLAIMS PAID 09/21/83 -- — _—. _ SUMMARY_ AMOUNT .� N 1 OPER FUND $ 27.80 — —��---- --_ ACC o f UIr D 1 ,7 3 2.5 0 ------- - 3573 Z U2 ACORFUNDD 7,469. 17 i F7VFUND 21 ,820.00 --- ------ �,•P> #3 OPER FUND 9 149.73 ' '.•I,__, #3 ACO FUND 1 ,174.82 ,'•j-I -�3�7R-FURD. — 1 ,050.00 ---- ----i - 3 N5 OPER FUND 4,415.80 ' N5 ACO FUND 4 782.00 !..I—---Ab--UPER—FURS 13.20 - --- — — 1lpp #6 ACO FUND 1 ,743.05 " ! N7 OPER FUND 2,554.35 f- -97 -ACD--FUND -- �..� NI1 OPER FUND 8,609.70 1 #11 ACO FUND 253. 15 I'.Ir A13-AC0-"Nu , .79 N5s6 OPER FUND 933.99 1 L.+d JT OPER FUND 216,715.34 0.41 ----- -- -1 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 1 ,033.50 i ,••;:o SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2 135.30 c__) - --JT-W(Y �7f RR1NPTTliI--FUR 35 047. 3 c/)- - -TOTAL-GLAIMS--PENB-09/21/83-- --- _$560,305:40 ----- - --- -- - - - -- - - --- .. � I Page 1 of 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 - - - - CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: George Miller Construction Company DATE September 22, 1983 REHABILITATION OF BUSHARD TRUNK, PHASE I, ADAMS AVENUE TO ELLIS AVENUE, JOB: JOB NO. I-2R-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) -(Bedach) $ 1,881.41 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. Contractor is directed to remodel and repair six manhole benches, in accordance with proposal dated September 7, 1983;' and Section 10-4, Extra Work, for the unit price of $225.00 each: 6 manho-le benches @ $225/each $ 1,350.00 2. Contractor is directed to seal leaking joints in existing vitrified clay pipes under Flood Control Channel, in accordance with Contractor's proposal dated September 22, 1983, for the lump sum amount of. :.. 531.41 TOTAL ADD: $ 1,881.41 aaa�asaaaaa- The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or con- sequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. 0 Calendar Days �a-ssaas��aaaa 14x� "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" r Page 2 of 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -_ P. O. BOB 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: George Miller Construction Company DATE September 22, 1983 REHABILITATION OF BUSHARD TRUNK, PHASE I, ADAMS AVENUE TO ELLIS AVENUE, - JOB: JOB NO. I-2R-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Bedt2et)- $ 1,881.41 r SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date July 12, 1983 Original Contract Time 150 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 8, 1983 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Original Contract Time 150 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 8, 1983 Original Contract Price $ 676,596.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) -(Beduct) $ 1,881.41 Amended Contract Price $ 678,477.41 Board authorization date: October 12, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ By, 1013/83 By_ 10/3/83 Contractor Deputy Chief Engineer "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-155 �..d AWARDING JOB NO. PW-108 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE AND DIGESTER GAS PIPING, PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-108 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, ,6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That ;the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of r Directors by the Districts' .Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Kiewit Pacific Company for Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Job No. PW-108, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, be awarded to Kiewit Pacific Company in the total amount of $87,866.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "E" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "E" ' • A No Addendum September 27, 1983 11:O0A.M. B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T _I JOB NO. PW-108 PROJECT TITLE SLUDGE AND DIGESTER GAS PIPING, PLANT NO. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Install 10-inch PVC digester gas lime, furnish and install supernatant piping from digesters A & B to digesters I & J, and additional process piping at digesters N, O and T. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE$ 100,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ REMARKS CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Kiewit Pacific Company Arcadia, CA $ 87,866 2. Dorado Enterprises, Inc. §Signal Hill, CA $ 90,654 3. Advanco Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $ 98,190 4. C K Pump & Dewatering Corp. Long Beach, CA $133,339 I have reviewed the proposals Submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Kiewit Pacific Company of Arcadia, California, in the bid amount of $87,866 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer "F" AGENDA ITEM #1O(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "F" RESOLUTION NO. 83-156 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-110 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION AT HEADWORRS "C", TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-110 The Boards of Directors.of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and ll of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That ,the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work `mare hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, be awarded to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the total amount of $58,179.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "G" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "G" No Addendum September 27, 1983 11:OOA.M. B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T _ JOB NO. PW-110 PROJECT TITLE SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION AT HEADWORKS "C", TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide and install a 10-inch PVC chlorine solution line from the Districts chlorination station to the "C" Headworks. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE$ 55,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ REMARKS CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID '•r 1. Dorado Enterprises, Inc. Signal Hill, CA $ 58,179 2. Jade Construction Company Fullerton, CA $ 77,475 3. Advarico Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $ 80,600 4. C R Pump & Dewatering Corp. Long Beach, CA • $ 96,464 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid and it appears that the Engineer's Estimate was low. I, therefore, recommend award to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. of Signal Hill, California, in the bid amount of $58,179 as the lowest and best bid. ahoma=sM.6Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer "H" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" . L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 September 28, 1983 (714) 540-2910 17 (714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Butler SUBJECT: Bid Specification No. A-115 One ( 1) Four Wheel Forklift Truck Sealed bids were opened on September 27, 1983, for furnishing and delivering one (1) -hew, 3,000 pound capacity forklift truck. The tabulation of bids are as follows: Company Bid Price McKinley Equipment Co $10 , 269.00 Irvine Nationwide Materials 10, 900. 00 Handling Equipment �.d Alhambra Freeborn Equipment Co. 11, 045.00 Santa Ana Material Handling Supply, Inc. 11, 396. 00 Buena Park Inland Empire Equipment, Ins. 11, 714. 00 Fullerton Myers Forklift, Inc. 12, 340. 00 Santa Ana W. T. Billard, Inc. No-Bid The need of an additional forklift truck is due to the opening of a central warehouse at Plant 2. It is recommended the award be made to McKinley Equipment Corp. , low bidder, for their bid price of $10 ,269.00, lus sales tax. The budgeted amount for this purchase $2 ,000. Ted Ho(ffmgn Chief of Procurement & Property TH/yh u "I" AGENDA ITEM #9(D) - ALL DISTRICTS "I" RESOLUTION NO. 83-157 - = " APPROVING THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, -- --� ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENCINA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, FOR ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN SCCWRP A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6; 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, - ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENCINA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, FOR ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE r SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District of Orange County is a signatory ,.f agency to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement creating the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority; and, WHEREAS, Article 15 of the First Amendment to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement creating the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority provides for the joinder of Associate Members; and, WHEREAS, the Leucadia County Water District, as Administrator of the Encina Joint Powers Agreement serving north San Diego County, has presented a certificate evidencing its desire to join the Authority as an Associate Member, all in accordance with the Authority's. Joint Powers Agreement; and, WHEREAS, signatories to said Joint Powers Agreement possess the common power to survey, study and report concerning sanitation and matters relating to sewage treatment and disposal; and, WHEREAS, approval of the signatory agencies to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement creating the Authority is required for acceptance of the said agency as an Associate Member of the Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" Section 1. That the Leucadia County Water District,_As__Administrator of the '—'Encina Joint Powers Agreement, be, and is hereby, approved as an Associate Member of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, in accordance with the terms of the Authority's Joint Powers Agreement, as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. '•r 11J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) - ALL DISTRICTS 11J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . TEL COOL 71-6 -S40-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - - _9 6 2-2 41 1 P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) - - - September 28, 1983 , Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Basins F and G at . Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-SR-2 In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee .has negotiated the following fee with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers in conjunction with the preparation of plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Basins F and G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2: Direct labor at scheduled hourly rates, including indirect overhead and profit, plus expenses, total contract not to exceed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40 ,000 .00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Donald A. Holt, Jr . , Chai an Richard Edgar, Vice Chairman Selection Committee lection Committee Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer - Approv Vsi y y ester nt neral Manager 17 AGENDA ITEM #9(G) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS 11V RESOLUTION NO. 83-158 _ `.d APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS RE DESIGN OF JOB NO. P2-5R-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY BASINS "F" & "G" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-5R-2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection, of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for engineering services re design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins "F" & "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2; and, WHEREAS, the Selection -Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers re design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins "F" & "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" Direct labor at scheduled _ - hourly rates plus approved indirect overhead and profit, and expenses, not to exceed... ..... ... $40,000.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No._l, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a -regular meeting held October 12, 1983. `d "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS f TE A CPH OO 714 AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA saa-2911 13 96Z•24I 1 P. O. BOX B127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706 lOS44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 26, 1983 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10 844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services During Construction Phase of Job No. P2-26, Primary Basins P and Q at Plant No. . 2 In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services , the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers in conjunction with construction phase engineering services for Primary Basins P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26: Direct labor at scheduled hourly rates plus indirect overhead $12, 380 Fixed fee $ 11900 Total fees not to exceed $14, 280 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Donald A. Holt, Jr. , C irman Richard Edgar, VicX Chairman Selection Committee lection Committee mas M. Dawes ief Engineer Approved: J, a e S vester A is ant eneral Manager "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) (1)- ALL DISTRICTS limit RESOLUTION NO. 83-159 - APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS �wr✓ FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONTRUCTION OF -- - — JOB NO. P2-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ' DURING CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY BASINS "P" &"Q" AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-26 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services required during construction of Primary Basins "P" & "Q" at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. ' NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers for engineering services during construction of Primary Basins "P" & "Q" at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: . "N-1" AGENDA- ITEM #9(H) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" Fixed Fee.. .. .. . . .. . . . ... . . . .. . ... .. .. $ 11900 Direct labor at scheduled hourly rates plus approved indirect overhead... . ..... . .. . ..... . . 12,380 TOTAL not to exceed.. ......... ... ... . $14,280 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" 10/3/83 11:00 A.M. B I D T A B U L A T ION S H E E T — SPECIFICATION NO. P-059 PROJECT TITLE SUPPLYING FERRIC CHLORIDE PROJECT DESCRIPTION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE$ BUDGET AMOUNT $ REMARKS 'r Price Per Dry Lb. VENDOR (delivered) TOTAL BID 1. Imperial West Chemical Company Antioch, CA $0.092255 $ 276,765.00 2. ChemWest Industries, Inc. San Francisco, CA 0.1154 $ 346,260.00 3. Southern California Chemical Co., Inc. Santa Fe Springs, CA 0.125 $ 375,000.00 I recommend that this bid be awarded to Imperial West Chemical Company of Antioch, CA, the low bidder for a unit price of $0.092255 per dry pound (delivered) and a total price of $276,765.00 including sales tax. Concur: D rec4 tor of Operations Chief of rocurem nt and Property "0" AGENDA ITEM #9 0) - ALL DISTRICTS Iron COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 LIQUID OR SPECIAL EMULSION POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL FLOCCULENT SPECIFICATION NO. P-060 BIDS RECEIVED ON 10-4-83 AT 1:00 P.M. Dosage Rate Wet LBS Unit Total Company/Location (LBS/Ton) Required Cost Price 1. Aqua Ben 9.1 12,600,000 0.075 $ 945,000.00 .2. Allied Chemical 9.8 13,781,250 .0699 $ 963,309.38 3. Calgon 7.0 14,000,000 0.0727 $1,017,800.00 4. American Cyanamid 10.3 17,490,566 0.1242 $2,172,328.30 5. Allied Colloids 14.6 2,628,000 1.49 $3,915,720.00 I recommend that this bid be awarded to Aqua Ben of Orange, California, the low bidder, for a total price of $945,000.00 plus applicable sales tax. Concur: Dire6tof of Operations Dire r of Proc rement and Property v.d "P" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) - ALL DISTRICTS "P" RESOLUTION NO. 83-162-3 - APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH —--_�--- ---� -- LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE CONTRACT NO. 3-24-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 - TO AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF RATELLA INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-24-1 WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of Ratella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Lowry & Associates to provide for payment for soils inspection and surveying services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated to that certain agreement dated May 11, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and Lowry & Associates, providing for payment for soils inspection services and surveying services required in connection with design of Ratella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be amended to include the following: Lump Sum Soils Inspection Services $2,150.00 Surveying Services 1,930.00 $4,080.00 and that the total contract be increased from $35,000.00 to $39,080.00; and, "Q-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) - DISTRICT 3 "Q-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby . .°"authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) - DISTRICT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 83-163-3 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH _ -----._--�--�_-- LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE CONTRACT NO. 3-24-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE -` COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE - DESIGN OF LAMPSON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-24-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of the Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Lowry & Associates to provide for payment for soils inspection and surveying services. NOW; THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated to that certain agreement dated May 11, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and Lowry & Associates, providing for payment for soils inspection services and surveying services required in connection with design of Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be amended to include the following: Lump Sum Soils Inspection Services $1,900.00 Surveying Services 1,930.00 $3,830.00 and that the total contract be increased from $22,000.00 to $25,080.00; and, "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 3 "R-1" Section 3. That the .Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby ''authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 3 "R-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-164-3 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH -�---- - _-- LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE CONTRACT NO. 3-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF ORANGE-WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-25 WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of Orange-Western •r Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Lowry & Associates to provide for payment for soils inspection and surveying services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated to that certain agreement dated May 11, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and Lowry & Associates, providing for payment for soils inspection services and surveying services required in connection with design of Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be amended to include the following: Lump Sum Soils Inspection Services $1,900.00 Surveying Services 1,930.00 $3,830.00 and that the total contract be increased from $25,000.00 to $28,830.00; and, "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(P) - DISTRICT 3 "S-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. `.r "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 3 "S-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS (r,� AREA CODE 74OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA540 z910 962-2411 P. ❑. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 927oa 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 28, 1983 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 5 and 6 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services in Connection with the Preparation of Environmental Immpact Report for Master Plan for District No. 5 and the South Half of District No. 6 In accordance -with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Envirosphere Company in connection with the preparation of Environmental Impact Report for Master Plan for District No. 5 and the South Half of District No. 6: Direct labor at scheduled hourly rates, plus indirect overhead $7,440.00 Outside services for traffic studies 1,800.00 Outside services for archaeological studies 200.00 TOTAL CONTRACT NOT TO EX® $9,440.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services 'to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. . Hart, Chairwomen Elvin Hutchison, Chairman District No. 5 i trio No. 6 Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Syl ter is t eral Manager 117 AGENDA ITEM #9(a)(1) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 83-165 �✓ APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ENVIROSPHERE COMPANY RE PREPARATION OF EIR ON UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR DISTRICT NO. 5 AND THE SOUTHERN HALF OF DISTRICT NO. 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ENVIROSPHERE COMPANY RE PREPARATION OF EIR ON UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR DISTRICT NO. 5 AND THE SOUTHERN HALF OF DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, -r 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the -selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with �Envirosphere Company for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HERESY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County and Envirosphere Company providing for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master flan Report for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) (2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "U-1" Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Outside Services, not to exceed.. . .. .. $ 2,000 Direct labor at scheduled hourly rates plus approved indirect overhead............... ..... 7,440 TOTAL not to exceed... . ... ... . ... ... . $ 9,440 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) (2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 11U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-161 tia�d APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH NATEL & COMPANY FOR CONSULTING SERVICES RELATIVE EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF A NEW TELEPHONE SYSTEM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH NATEL & COMPANY TO ASSIST IN THE PLANNING, DESIGN, SELECTION AND INSTALLATION OF A NEW TELEPHONE SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Districts' existing telephone system has reached capacity; and, WHEREAS, because of deregulation and entry of many new equipment suppliers into the marketplace, along with significant technological advances, there are considerably more telephone system options available now than a few years ago end staff, therefore, feels that professional assistance would be desirable and cost effective to assist in the'planning, design, selection and installation of a new system to meet the Districts' needs for the next decade. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the agreement dated with Natel & Company for consulting services to assist in the planning, design, selection and installation of a new telephone system to meet the Districts' needs, be, and is hereby, authorized and approved; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized on an hourly rate basis in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $16,000.00, as follows: "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-1" PRASE I - Not to exceed $ 7,500.00 _ (Review of the Districts' existing system, evaluation of long-term telecommunications requirements, design of a system to meet these requirements, solicit and evaluate vendor proposals, and recommend selection of a new system) PHASE II - Not to exceed $ 8,500.00 (Assistance in contract negotiations with the vendor and serving as the Districts' project manager for installation, testing and acceptance of the new system) Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTM at a regular meeting held October 12, 1983. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 31 5, 61 7 AND 11 OF y ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1983 oPAP U LD Cr�QE C Awl- ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELL IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on September 14, 1983, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and ir—cation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2).,w), 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank x Robert Luxembourger, Chairman pro tem Dan Griset x Don Saltarelli Ronald Hoesterey x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry Wedaa, Chairman Todd Murphy a Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Barbara Brown Marvin P. Adler x Sam Cooper Carrey Nelson x Donald Holt Robert Ruznik x Carol Rawanami William Odlum x Robert Luxembourger Dan Griset x Bob Perry Norman Culver x Don Smith Gene Beyer x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton x Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: x Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Roland Edwards x Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tem Otto Lacayo x Barbara Brown Marvin P. Adler Norman Culver x Bob Perry x Henry Frese Norma Seidel x Victor Grgas Joyce Risner x Don Griffin Jesse Davis x Robert Luxembourger Dan Griset x Frank Marshott Charles J. Rell x Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper a Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Charles Sylvia Anthony R. Selvaggi x John A. Thomas Robert P. Mandic, Jr. x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton x Duane Winters Buck Catlin ITSTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Philip Maurer x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Jacqueline Heather x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Elvin Hutchison, Chairman Orma Crank x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT N0. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Richard Edgar Ronald Hoesterey x Robert Luxembourger Dan Griset x Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran x James Wahner Harry Green `a.d x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister x Harriett Wieder, Chairman pro tem Roger Stanton Ron Pattinson x John Thomas -2- ' 9/14/83 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Tom Dawes, Bill Clarke, Rita Brown, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Hilary Baker OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Walt Howard, Milo Keith, Gail Lynch, Don Martinson * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 2 & 3 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following cities re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as member of the Boards: .� (*Mayor) City District(s) Active Director Alternate Director Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin* Jesse M. Davis La Habra 2 & 3 Dorothy Wedel* John Holmberg Villa Park 2 Carol H. Kawanami William J. Odlum* ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file communications re policy of limiting Directorship That the communications from the following member agencies relative to recently-adopted District policy urging each member agency to have a single Director represent all Districts of which the agency is a member be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: City/Agency Date of Letter Buena Park August 16, 1983 Costa Mesa Sanitary District August 12, 1983 La Habra August 17, 1983 Seal Beach August 30, 1983 Stanton • August 26, 1983 Tustin August 15, 1983 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file letter from the Mayor of Huntington Beach That the letter from the Mayor of Huntington Beach seating John Thomas as Alternate Director to Ron Pattinson for the September 14, 1983 meeting only be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -3- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that as a Adopting resolution expressing result of adoption of the Districts' appreciation for service of voluntary policy of limiting retiring Directors representation on the Boards to one �..d Director for each member agency, several Directors will be retiring from the Boards. He asked for adoption of a resolution expressing appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing their service to the Districts; whereupon it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-154, expressing appreciation and recognizing the faithful service of several retiring Directors. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt reported that Adopting_ resolution expressing Supervisor Tom Riley had retired from appreciation for services of the Districts' Boards of Directors after Supervisor Riley eight years of service as a member of the Joint Boards, several special committees, and representing the Board of Supervisors on the Executive Committee. Mr. Holt then submitted Resolution No. 83-152, commending Supervisor Thomas Riley for his outstanding contributions and dedicated service to the Districts since 1975; whereupon, adoption of said resolution was moved, seconded and unanimously carried. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes _ to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 9/14/83 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that Report of the Joint Chairman considerable progress had been made recently toward obtaining the 301(h) waiver from full secondary treatment. Districts' staff met on several occasions with officials from EPA Region IX and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the apparent misunderstandings between the two regulatory agencies regarding how to best proceed with issuance of the waiver have been resolved, and it appears that EPA Region IX and the Regional Board will be able to issue the waiver within six months. The conditions agreed to in the waiver which relate to sludge disposal and flow verification will be incorporated by the Regional Board into an enforcement order,, which will be issued along.with the NPDES permit to the Districts. Mr. Holt informed Directors that he would be testifying before the House Water Resources Subcommittee in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, September 22, regarding the Districts' proposed research project for deep ocean disposal of sludge. Legislative approval is required to enable the Districts to proceed with the project, and the Joint Chairman advised that the subcommittee was holding hearings this month on the 1983 Amendments to the Clean Water Act. Chairman Holt also indicated that he hoped to meet prior to the hearings with Congressmen Ron Packard of Orange and San Diego Counties and Glen Anderson of Los Angeles County, both of whom are members of the Subcommittee, to enlist their active support for the Districts' proposal. The Joint Chairman commented on several news articles in the Los Angeles Times concerning a proposal by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and certain regulatory agencies to dispose of treated waste from the Stringfellow toxic waste dump site in Riverside County through the Santa Ana River Interceptor. He reported that the Boards had not received a formal request from SAWPA regarding this proposed discharge and stated that the Assistant General Manager would comment further on the matter in his report to the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt reminded Directors Appointing Commissioners to SCCWRP that former Director Jim Sharp had been appointed to continue as the Districts' Commissioner to the Southern California Coastal Research Project (SCCWRP) following his retirement from the Boards last year. Mr. Sharp has recently been elected President of the SCCWRP Commission, and Chairman Holt recommended that the Boards authorize his reappointment as the Districts' SCCWRP representative for another year because of his knowledge, experience and position on the Commission. Mr. Holt further recommended that Director Don Griffin be appointed as Mr. Sharp's alternate to the Commission. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That retired Director Jim Sharp be, and is hereby, appointed to continue as the Districts' Commissioner to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) through July, 1984; and FURTHER MOVED: That Director Don Griffin be appointed as alternate Commissioner to SCCWRP. -5- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Holt appointed Director Robert Appointing representatives to SARFPA Hanson as the Districts representative to the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) ; and Director Carol Rawanami to continue as the Districts' `mod alternate representative. ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Holt announced the appointment Appointment of Reclaimed Water of Directors Barbara Brown and Bob Pricing Policy Committee Members Perry to serve with Directors Don Saltarelli (Chairman) and Bill Vardoulis on the Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy Committee. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt reported that he Appointment of Fiscal Policy had appointed Director Henry Frese to Committee Members chair the Fiscal Policy Committee, and reappointed Directors Carol Rawanami and Ron Pattinson and Vice Joint Chairman Richard Edgar to the Committee. He also appointed Director Don Griffin to replace Supervisor Harriett Wieder, who will be moving to the Executive Committee to replace retiring Supervisor Tom Riley. ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Holt announced that he had Appointment of Building Committee reactivated the Building Committee to Members work with staff on expansion of the Districts' administrative offices and laboratory. He appointed Director Norm Culver as Chairman and named Directors Jerry Mullen, Charles Sylvia and James Wahner to serve on the Committee. The Joint Chairman also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, September 28, at 5:30 p.m., immediately following an adjourned meeting of District No. 1 at 4:00 p.m. at the Districts' administrative offices. He invited Directors Robert Luxembourger and Don Saltarelli to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS The Assistant General Manager reported that Report of the General Manager the Joint Chairman had asked him to comment on recent news accounts regarding a proposal by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and certain regulatory agencies to discharge wastewater from the Stringfellow site near Glen Avon in Riverside County into the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) . He reviewed the history of SAWPA's capacity rights in the SARI and advised Directors that representatives of SAWPA had informally contacted the Districts' staff early in the year regarding the possibility of discharging treated wastewater from the abandoned Stringfellow dump site into the Districts' sewerage system through the SARI line. He pointed out that the Districts' Chief Engineer had denied the request in a letter dated July 11, 1983, a copy of which had been included in the Directors' meeting folders along with the recent newspaper articles regarding the proposal, and reviewed the reasons for the denial. Mr. Sylvester stated that although the Districts staff had not received a formal request from SAWPA or seen a copy of the proposal, it was staff's understanding that it is a joint proposal of SAWPA, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, EPA Region IX and the State Health Services Department. They are attempting to develop a more cost-effective and environmentally sound alternative to the current practice of trucking the wastewater from Stringfellow to a Class I dump. The proposed approach would include a pretreatment system at the Stringfellow site to remove heavy metals and organics, and the treated water would then be transfered into a two-stage holding tank where it could be transferred to the SARI only after it had passed stringent testing to assure compliance with standards that would be imposed by the Districts. -6- 9/14/83 The Assistant General Manager assured Directors that before a single drop of wastewater from Stringfellow would be accepted by the Districts a formal proposal would have to be submitted to the Districts and approved by the Boards of Directors, the Regional Board, the State Health Services Agency, EPA, and any other agency with regulatory authority. The Joint Chairman, Assistant General Manager and General Counsel then answered questions of the Directors regarding the SAWPA proposal. Mr. Sylvester then called the Directors' attention to the first edition of a quarterly newsletter that will be issued to Directors to keep them informed of the current status of District construction projects and activities of the Industrial Waste division. He also highlighted a report included in the agenda package outlining the activities of the Districts LA/OMA Ultimate Solids Disposal Project citizens' advisory committee, and indicated that public participation was an important element of the Districts' 301(h) waiver application. The Boards will be kept apprised as the program proceeds. ` ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel called District No. 2 Report of the General Counsel Directors' attention to the supplemental agenda item regarding initiation of legal proceedings to collect $46,463.88 in outstanding invoices due the District from Arrowhead Linen Company, an industrial waste permittee located in Anaheim. Mr. Woodruff advised that the Districts have been attempting to collect these outstanding invoices for an extended period with no success. He recommended initiation of legal action to collect the monies owed the District. The General Counsel then reported that the Districts had recently been dismissed from a case in which the Districts were named as co-defendants with one of our contractors in which a private citizen fell into an open pit on the construction site and was injured. Mr. Woodruff also reported that on September 13, the Districts received full dismissal of the alleged fly infestation case at Plant No. 1 filed by residents living across from the plant. The Assistant General Manager reported that the unusually hot and humid weather experienced recently had caused intermittent odor problems at the treatment plants. He emphasized that the Districts have been spending large sums of money for both new facilities and operating costs to control odors and that every effort was being made, to mitigate odors. However, Mr. Sylvester indicated , in spite of our large expenditures, odor control efforts in such extreme conditions are not always 100% effective and, from time to time, citizens living in close proximity to either of tb.- treatment plants may experience odors from our facilities. ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester reported that the Districts Receive and file Districts' had received a report from the Orange County 1982-83 Interest Earnings Report Treasurer regarding interest earned for the from the County Treasurer 1982-83 fiscal year on the Districts' construction reserves. The report indicated that the average interest rate earned during fiscal year 1982-83 was 12.79 percent, down 4.125 percent from the average 1981-82 interest rates. Mr. Sylvester advised the Directors that the earnings would be reflected in the Districts' 1982-83 financial audit report, which they would receive this fall. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: �d -7- 9/14/83 That the 1982-83 year-end fiscal report of the interest earned by the Districts submitted by the Orange County Tax Collector-Treasurer, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. V„d ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "B" and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 8/10 83 8/24/83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 441,107.19 $208,286.87 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 143,412.57 29,030.47 Joint Working Capital Fund - 46,853.44 55,796.22 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,405.17 17,475.37 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 258.32 2,080.28 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,412.16 103,985.75 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 753,122.67 22,755.53 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 185,116.42 9,904.08 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 213.73 339.04 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,461.15 1,278.06 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 2,458.24 5,684.94 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 14,566.48 2,224.26 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,947.76 16.14 $1,614,335.30 $ 458,856.41 �.d ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Specification No. C-013 to Olympic Chemical Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-153, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase contract to Furnish, Deliver and Supply Chlorine in Bulk at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. C-013, to Olympic Chemical Company at the price of $101.90 per ton plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re- That the Boards of Directors hereby Job No. PW-085-1 (Rebid) approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Bulk Chlorine Safety Piping and Platforms at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-085-1 (Rebid) , revising the handrail finish to be used. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Specification No. E-133 approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specification for Purchase of Six Standardized Samplers for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133, changing payment terms. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. -8- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carrried: Rejecting all bids for Specification No. E-133 That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation to reject all bids for Purchase of Six Standardized Samplers for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133; and, FURTHER MOVED: That all bids received for Purchase of Six Standardized Samplers for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133 be, and are hereby, rejected; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be directed to evaluate other lower cost options for samplers. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Specification No. P-057 That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding annual purchase of Pipe, Valves and Fittings, Specification No. P-057, as follows: Annual Amount Item Vendor Not to Exceed Group I - Malleables Republic Supply $25,000 Group II - Pipe Familian Pipe & Supply 10,000 Galv. & Black Group IIIA - Valves Valley Cities Supply 10,000 Ohio Brass (Mfg.) Group IIIB - Valves Allied Supply Company 5,000 Apollo (Mfg.) Group IV - PVC Pipe Familian Pipe & Supply 15,000 & Fittings ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Job No. PW-098 specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $1,843.92 to the contract with Fremont Indemnity Company (bonding company for L & H Construction) and granting a time extension of 133 calendar days for delay in completion of the project as a result of the contractor filing bankruptcy, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-098 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-133, accepting Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -9- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Job No. PW-099 approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and �.d specifications for Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, providing for a new form of contract, changing the number of completion days and clarifying miscellaneous contract provisions. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-099 to CK Pump & Dewatering Corporation That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-134, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, to CK Pump & Dewatering Corporation in the amount of $131,659.85. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Job No. PW-104 approve Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Safety Handrails on Scum Boxes at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-104, changing the completion time from 90 days to 140 days and allowing the contractor to bid either stainless steel or anodized aluminum handrails. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-104 to CraneVeyor Corporation That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-135, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Safety Handrails on Scum Boxes at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-104, to CraneVeyor Corporation in the amount of $13,190.40 which utilizes the anodized aluminum handrails listed under Schedule B. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. l to the plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Job No. PW-106 approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications to Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-106, providing for a new form of contract and making minor clarifications to the Detailed Specifications. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-106 to George & B. Morgan Company, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-136, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract to replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-106, to George & B. Morgan Company, Inc., in the amount of $76,450.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -10- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Job No. PW-107 approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107, providing for a new form of contract and clarifying miscellaneous contract provisions. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-107 -to Belmont Engineering That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-137, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Safety Platforms at Belt Filter Presses, Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-107, to Belmont Engineering in the amount of $32,156.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-108 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-138, approving plans and specifications for Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-110 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-139, approving plans and specifications for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Specification No. L-011 to Mordigan Trees That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-150, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding Property Lease at Plant No. 2, Specification No. L-011, to Mordigan Trees for the amount of $7,000 per . annum. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. I-8R-1 specifications for Manhole Repair, Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8R-1, authorizing an addition of $2,020.00 to the contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. for repair of PVC lining turnback and additional coating required for two vent vaults, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -11- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. I-8R-1 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-140,, accepting Manhole Repair, Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8R-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action in procuring additional ferric chloride and That the action of staff in procuring amending 4113183 Boards' action additional ferric chloride for odor re Specification No. P-055 control purposes in an amount not to exceed $102,000 be, and is hereby, ratified; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards' action of April 13, 1983, approving the trial of a ferric chloride standby odor control system at Plant No. 2 and authorizing acquisition of chemicals and equipment rental for an amount not to exceed $115,500.00, Specification No. P-055, be, and is hereby, amended to increase said authorization to $217,500.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to That the General Manager be, and is attend the Annual Water Pollution hereby, authorized to designate one Control Federation Conference in staff member to attend the Annual Water Atlanta, Georgia Pollution Control Federation Conference on October 2-7, 1983, in Atlanta, �..d' Georgia; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase orders for Specification No. P-058 That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue purchase orders to the following suppliers for Purchase of Alternative Filter Press Replacement Belts for Evaluation, Specification No. P-058, as follows: r 1. National Filter Media $3,689.31 plus tax & freight 2. Environmental Products 3,373.12 plus tax (freight included) 3. Parkson Industrial Filter Cloths 4,334.00 plus tax & freight ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny amended claim submitted by John Flores re That the amended claim submitted by John damage to his vehicle caused by Flores in the amount of $1,018.00 for paint overspray at Plant No. 2 alleged damage to his vehicle caused by site paint overspray at the Districts' Plant No. 2 site, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim is denied and referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. -12- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim submitted by Bruce A. Chapman re That the claim submitted by Bruce A. damage to his vehicle caused by Chapman in the amount of $960.00 for paint overspray at Plant No. 2 alleged damage to his vehicle caused by site paint overspray at the Districts' Plant �,✓ No. 2 site, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim is denied and referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Resolution No. 83-112 re renewal agreement with Digidyne That the Boards of Directors hereby Com uter Services (formerly Mini- adopt Resolution No. 83-141, amending Computer Systems, Inc.) for 1983-84 Resolution No. 83-112, adopted July 13, 1983, which authorized a renewal agreement with Digidyne Computer Services (formerly Mini-Computer Systems, Inc.) for maintenance of the Districts' accounting computer system hardware for 1983-84, for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00; providing for cancellation of said agreement in accordance with the termination clause effective November 1, 1983; and authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement with L & L Services for maintenance of the accounting computer system hardware for the period November 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984, for an amount not to exceed $8,600. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Boards' action authorizing purchase order for acquisition of a That the Boards' action of July 13, Reconditioned Atomic Absorption 1983, authorizing issuance of a purchase Spectrophotometer, Specification order to Spectron, Inc. for acquisition No. E-138 of a Reconditioned Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer, Specification No. E-138, in the amount of $9,975.00, increasing said amount by $872.00 which represents the sales tax which was inadvertently omitted from the original proposal of Spectron (increases total amount to $10,847.00 which includes tax and freight, net after trade-in allowance for two obsolete AA units and one obsolete organic carbon analyzer) , be, and is hereby amended. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving continuation proposal of California Institute of Techno- That the Boards of Directors hereby logy for Research Planning Study adopt Resolution No. 83-151, approving for Orange County Sludge Experiment continuation proposal (Supplement No. 3) re Ocean Disposal of Sludge of California Institute of Technology for Research Planning Study for Orange County Sludge Experiment re Ocean Disposal of Sludge, providing for a 90-day extension of said study from September 30, 1983, to December 31, 1983, in order to enable continuation of work on tasks defined by Cal Tech, NOAA and the Districts, and to synchronize the agreement period of Cal Tech and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ; and authorizing an increase of $10,000 for said additional work, increasing the total compensation from $84,374.00 to $94,374.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. 11W -13- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo That the Selection Committee be, and is Enginers re Job No. P2-26 hereby authorized to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services required during construction of Primary Basins P & Q at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Butier Engi- Certification re final negotiated fee neering, Inc. for Construction with Butier Engineering, Inc. for Management Services Construction Management Services for treatment plant contracts during the period September 15, 1983 to September 14, 1984, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 7 to Agree- ment with Butier Engineering, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby re Jobs Nos. P2-23 and P2-24 adopt Resolution No. 83-142, approving Addendum No. 7 to Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for Construction Management Services re Jobs Nos. P2-23 and P2-24, providing for additional services re treatment plant contracts during the period September 15, 1983 to September 14, 1984, on an actual per diem cost-plus-profit basis, for an amount not to exceed $238,000.00 (increases maximum total compensation from $1,709,225.00 to $1,947,225.00) . A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Butier Engi- certification re final negotiated fee neering, Inc. re Jobs Nos. with Butier Engineering, Inc. for P2-23-1, P2-23-2, P2-23-3, P2-23-5, professional services re grant claim P2-23-6, P2-24-1, P2-24-2, P2-25-1A submittals and construction management services re completion of remaining work on Districts' Jobs Nos. P2-23-1, P2-23-2, P2-23-3, P2-23-5, P2-23-6, P2-24-1, P2-24-2, and P2-25-1A, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 8 to Agree- ment with Butier Engineering, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby for Construction Management adopt Resolution No. 83-143, approving Services Addendum No. 8 to Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for Construction Management Services re Jobs Nos. P2-23 and P2-24, providing for professional services re grant claim submittals and construction management services re - completion of remaining work on Districts' Jobs Nos. P2-23-1, P2-23-2, P2-23-3, P2-23-5, P2-23-6, P2-24-1, P2-24-2 and P2-25-1A, on an actual per diem cost-plus-profit basis, for an amount not to exceed $53,950.00 (increases maximum total compensation from $1,947,225.00 to $2,001,175.00) . A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -14- 9/14/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with John Carollo certification re final negotiated fee Engineers re Job No. P2-25-2 with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services required during , construction of the Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 4 to Agree- ment Be- ment with John Carollo Engineers That the Boards of Directors hereby re Job No. P2-25-2 adopt Resolution No. 83-144, approving Addendum No. 4 to Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Job No. P2-25-2, providing for additional engineering services required during construction of the Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, on an actual per diem cost-plus-fixed fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $56,731.00 (increases maximum total compensation from $607,500.00 plus actual cost for outside services not to exceed $25,000 to $664,231.00 plus said outside services) . A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Initial Study, Environmental Impact Assessment That the Initial Study, Environmental and Notice of Preparation of Envi- Impact Assessment and Notice of ronmental Impact Report re Updated Preparation of Environmental Impact and Consolidated Master Plan of Report on the Updated and Consolidated Trunk Sewers Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6, and District No. 7, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., September 28, 1983, to discuss long-range financing needs. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:14 p.m., September 14, 1983. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Initial Study, Environmental Impact Assessment That the Initial Study, Environmental and Notice of Preparation of Envi- Impact Assessment and Notice of ronmental Impact Report re Updated Preparation of Environmental Impact and Consolidated Master Plan of Report on the Updated and Consolidated Trunk Sewers Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District Nos. 2, 3 and 11, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That the Boards of Directors hereby Contract No. 3-3R-1 approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, 796+83, Contract No. 3-3R-1, providing for a new form of contract and clarifying miscellaneous contract provisions. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards. -15- 9/14/83 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, That the Board of Directors hereby Station 796+83, Contract No. 3-3R-1 adopts Resolution No. 83-145-3, to 11WAW receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Station 796+83, Contract No. 3-3R-1, to George Miller Construction Company in the amount of $37,777.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. l to the glans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 3-23R specifications for Manhole Repair, Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-23R, granting a time extension of 22 calendar days to the contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. for delays requested by District to accommodate other projects, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 3-23R as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-146-3, accepting Manhole Repair, Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-23R, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. `�.►� DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:14 p.m., September 14, 1983. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:14 p.m., September 14, 1983. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., September 14, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 11-13-3 as___ complete _ That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-149-11, accepting Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part ,*WW of these minutes. -16- 9/14/83 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , September 14, 1983. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 The Assistant General Manager called on the Staff Report on formation of Deputy Chief Engineer to provide a brief posed District No. 13 status report to the Directors relative to formation of proposed District No. 13. Mr. Dawes referred the Directors to a map outlining the boundaries of the District, and pointed out various areas within the District and the facilities available to serve the proposed District. He indicated that the new District would be purchasing a proportionate share of capacity in existing Districts' facilities that would serve the District once it is formed. Since more than sixty percent of the District is now open space or recreational land, the original capacity purchase will be approximately 2 MGD, although the ultimate flow expected from District No. 13 is between 11 and 12 MGD. The Districts' consulting engineers are recommending division of the District into three zones based on the status of previously proposed annexations to Districts Nos. 2 and 7 and topographical differences and related pumping requirements to bring wastewater from these zones into Districts' conveyance facilities. The Districts are currently moving forward with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the area. An Environmental Assessment has been completed, and a Notice of Preparation of an EIR has been mailed to all affected local and State agencies. Mr. Dawes indicated that comments have been received from eight agencies so far, and no major problems have surfaced. He felt that the EIR would be completed in November. Mr. Dawes informed the Directors that the Districts' General Counsel had been worki!!� with the County staff to reach an agreement formalizing the formation of the District. The staff has concurrently been preparing a list of the approximately 2,500 property owners within the boundaries of the new District so that appropriate notices relative to formation of the proposed District can be sent as required. Regarding financing of the proposed District, the Assistant General Manager advised the Directors that in light of the Districts' agreement with the County of Orange, District 13 would receive no property tax revenues, but would be required to levy an annual user fee to pay the District's operations and maintenance costs. Mr. Dawes also noted that the consulting engineer's preliminary report estimated connection fees of $1500 per unit. Mr. Sylvester advised the Directors that the user and connection fees would be set annually by the Board. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 The Joint Chairman advised the Directors Appointing District No. 13 that since the new District would Steering Committee encompass portions of Anaheim, Brea, Orange, Yorba Linda and unincorporated County territory, it would be desirable to form a Steering Committee comprised of Directors representing these areas to advise the staff as formation of the District proceeds as they will become the Board of Directors when District No. 13 is formed. Chairman Holt then appointed the following Directors to the District No. 13 Steering Committee: -17- 9/14/83 Director Representing Don Roth Anaheim Sam Cooper Brea Don Smith Orange Henry Wedaa Yorba Linda Supervisor Harriett Wieder Unincorporated areas Holt also appointed himself and Vice Joint Chairman Edgar to the Steering Committee to represent the interests of the Joint Boards. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Initial Study, Environmental Impact Assessment and That the Initial Study, Environmental Notice of Preparation of an Envi- Impact Assessment and Notice of ronmental Impact Report re forma- Preparation of an Enviromental Impact tion of District No. 13 Report relative to the formation of proposed County Sanitation District No. 13, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing initiation of legal action to collect outstanding That initiation of legal action to invoices owed the District by collect $46,463.88 in outstanding Arrowhead Linen Company, Industrial invoices owed the District by Arrowhead Waste Permit No. 2-195 Linen Company of Anaheim, Industrial Waste Permit No. 2-195, as recommended by the General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m. , September 14, 1983. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of .80 acres of territory to the District re Annex- That the Board of Directors hereby ation No. 100 - Hansen Annexation adopts Resolution No. 83-147-7, ordering annexation of .80 acres of territory to the District located at 1701 Sirrine Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 100 - Hansen Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -18- 9/14/83 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing initiation of proceed- ings re proposed Annexation No. That the Board of Directors hereby 119 - Roberts Annexation adopts Resolution No. 83-148-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .66 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Highcliff Drive and Newport Boulevard in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 119 - Roberts Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m. , September 14, 1983. • Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 1a.r� -19- • FUND NO 91S9 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/83 PAGE 1 FEPORT NUMBER AP43 CntJN-T-Y•-SANI-TATI0N--DFMTR.1CTS"-0E-•--ORANOE -EOUN-TY--- __-----.---- _. .-----....._-.---.--.._..._._ -----_.--------4`.__I CLAIMS PAID 08/10/A3 ..__..WARRANT--NO.-.---_ ..--- - -VENDOF! --_-_.. -- -- -...- AMOUNT-........ P65093 A-1 NURSERIES S77.09 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES ---065094 ---A0AMSON-INOUSTR-TESe !M('-r- - --- - ----- 584.•20---------SAFETY--SUPPLIES- - _____.__-___._.._--- - ----_.---.-----_---- G6509`' ALL-STATE VEHICLES• INC. 529218.62 VEHICLE LEASING 065096 AMERICAN LOCK 8 SUPPLY• INC. $217.30 SMALL HARDWARE 1 - 065097- - ---AM€FF"1GAN�GIENi1FI�PRBPUCTS-- --- - -- -- -- S82i38- - EL•ECTR-ICA6 SUPPI IES--.-_.._--_----.------.-.--•_ 065098 ANAHFIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $486.30 CSDOC #5 MANHOLE REPAIRS 065099 TtIE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S1,434.71 PUMP PARTS S26wOG EMPL-DYEE--MILEAGE--...- -- --_ --- --- ----- ,�...__� 065101 AQUA BEN CORP. $239933.09 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 065102 ASSOCIATED CONCRETF- PROD.. INC S597.84 BUILDING MATERIALS 0651 0 b -----tUTONwTED-"DEDURR I NG-SUMP-LY-------•• ------ ___.-____._--$331-.28-----SAFETY-SUPPL I-ES --•--- ----_ _. .--.--.- __ i ( i.. 065304 BAKER PLYWOOD CO-* INC. 5443.32 SMALL HARDWARE t !I 065105 KATHY CARBOUR $41.60 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE " 6510E-- --gtkGON-BA-Y-UNTEPPPISES.-TNGr-------- ----s1k5z00- -----CAR-WASH-COUPONS -- -- ---- t 065107 DIF.PLY B 4SSOCIATF'S• INC. S2,162.00 WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATORS i 0651OR DIG BOX RENTAL CO. SI1729.00 TRASH DISPOSAL j -----..065Ip�.-_.__---BPENNER-F IELUER-A-A�5Af•-LNG. ---- ---_---•- - -•S1r179.14-------- ELECTRICAL .SUPPLIES-- _- -- -- -- -- --- --- i OG511^ PRISTOL PARK MEDICAL GPI'.. INC $104.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 065111 OPOADLCY JAMES CORP. S230.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i __066132-- F1/€NF-YARK- �UMC�EN-ice HA•R•E-WARE - --S82-5-653- EUMBER 069113 C B P RECONDITIONING CO. $39950.00 PUMP REPAIRS - - �4' 065114 CK PUPP AND DEWATEFING COPP. $14.535.58 RETENTION 5-25 (k E,r.11'­--­-C-P T--C A L­I U OR 4 1 A 9-4 IVC-.- _-_------------ -- S154660---•---WORD-PROCESSOR REPAIRS ----- ~I 06511E CARMENITA FORD TRUCK. SALES, INC. 145.01 TRUCK PARTS 065117 JOHN CtPOLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN $29436.28 P2-23 CONSTRUCTION, TRAINING ...-._.-11651111 - --GHAHP4-ON•-FF:NGE-G0.• -S4"v091-,00--- -FENCING=-PLANT--12-"WAREHOUSE- - - , !! _� P65119 CHEMWFST INDUSTRIES, INC. $40.536.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE 1I 06512o CHEVRON U.S.A.• IPC. S79890.62 GASOLINE j; .-_.... 66C,121 - __EOAST_.cWF'EPING•-IF;C-.- - -.._-..__._._., -- ---- --- - - $380.00-.. . -- -- PLANT MAINTENANCE --- - ( t 065122 CONNELL CHEVROLET $152.00 TRUCK PARTS 06512 CONROCK COMFANY $1.277.62 BUILDING MATERIALS I ----0 6 5 1 2 4------------CONSOLIDATED-ELF.GT-F-IGAL--PT-6T•----- --- - --- -- - S63.95------- —-ELECTRICAL...SUPPLIES -- ------_ .. -------.__. ------ ._....----- � 06512° CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $45,124.20 CHLORINE n65126 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $1.003.62 ENGINE PARTS " ..__ ..065127--.-------._...._C OOP D-I14ATED E OUT P-.--CO.•-1N( $500.00- --... CHLORINE HOIST. SAFETY TEST . ' 065128 HR. CRANF S4.006.50 CRANE RENTAL ! 065124 CAL CONSOLIDATED VATIF S21.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 0651-3.1L--- ---LAP"R-Y-CUR-TT-TRUCK--&--T:(4L*IF•-F•IENT_____.--_--...._....__...__-.Sq-16i00__---.- TRUCK RENTAL 065131 CURTIN MATHESON SCIFNTIFIC S155.05 LAB SUPPLIES 065132 UMF• INC. $19106.61 FLEX JOINT •• ------..C65133--------DECKEF:._1NS7RUMEMiT-_SUl1!.Fx--C.q•---•.-----._._..__._..--.----.._5480.5A-.---•--------ELECTRI.CAL SUPPLIES �. 065134 DECO $49579.23 CAPACITORS AND MISC. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065133 DELPHI SYSTEMS, INC. $97.50 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES (" ._-._G6513F-----UCW-EAR SALG.S--ilr SF1-V"I•CF--_ _ _ - - - - -- 1339.59 --.-_.. ....._-----PIPE• SUPPLIES__._ _.. . ._ . .. ..... ............ ----- . 065137 THE DICK:ON COMPANY 5330.02 LAB SUPPLIES " 065138 DIESEL CONTP.OL COFF S614.62 ENGINE REPAIRS FUND NO 91?9 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/83 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 4 -G•OW9{•Y-6-AN•ITAT-ION-D1 Sip ICTS--OF---ORANGE-COUNTY---_-_....._..-..... ._ ... .--- ._....... _._. ._-_-...._.._..___._----__-- _ Ii CLAIMS PAID 08/10/83 is ----WARRANT-•-NO.---- ---- --VFNDAR - --..-- .-._.._.AMOUNT.._-... - _ . _.-_----DESCRIPTION._._ . 065139 DORADO ENTERPRISES• INC. $17.304.49 PLANT dig #2 WATER LINE REPAIRS 1 065140------ ---..•nUNN--LDWARDS-G0pp. --- - -..-- ---...5686,84 -- -PA'1NT -SUPPLIES - __--- �- �' 065141 FAGLE SUPPLY OF CALIF. $508.83 PIPE SUPPLIES 065142 EASTMAN• INC. 31.271.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES �; ---- OG514T-- ---•-----ENGiI(EFRING-SCIENCE- ------ - - --g30.000.00 - ENGR:--CO-COMBUSTION-FEASIBILITY - -" - ---- ---- ';i P65144 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S2.808.00 GRANT C-o6-1373-011 OVERPAYMENT ;: ) 96514E FLOERAL EXPRESS CORI'. S12.50 FREIGHT „ "'..-- 065146------ -F-iS&HER-F.-P8fl7ER--GOr --------_..._.-..------••-E730.1$- --PIPE-'SUPPL'IES-- _._..------------ -.-------. --•----__-.._ i 065147 FISHER CONTROLS S376.39 CONTROL EQUIPMENT ;: ) 065148 FLAT 8 VERTICAL C(,NCPFTF 593.00 BUILDING MATERIALS „ -06514.9-------.- -I: UN.To-T-N-V.ALLEY=--CAll1.f-A - -.-- - ------.-._..__._.__.E598.37--- --FILM PROCESSI-NG---- 06515io FRANCE COIIPRESSnR POODUCT $534.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS ) 065151 FRUIT GROWERS LADOI?tTOPY. INC- S26.00 LAB ANALYSIS ..L--- 313�.00f-- --IiATER...USEAGE.._... _.... - - - ----.-__._._.-_.. ----- � P b§;5 2--------G I T-1�--0 f-F�1 LL E R TO N-- 065153 GENERAL TELEPHONE CA. $1.651.64 TELEPHONE ) I � 065154 GREAT LAKES INSTRUMENTS* INC. 31033.89 PH RECORDER 0(4%45 -- ---JUAN 611.446----- - -- --- --_ 533.44----- EMPLOYEE MILEAGE - ---_ - - -__ _�------,. ICI 06515E LARRY HALLOS S60.00 TRUCK REPAIRS ) 065157 I+ALPRIN SUPPLY CO. S645.22 SMALL HARDWARE 6.A n6§15r�-- µER;•-- R-L-tAS-1((T -f427.34 VEMhCL-E-tEA51NO --�- -- -- � : 06515`.' THE HESIK C0.9 INC.. 1608.31 TRUCK PARTS 06516P IIOAGLAND-ARTUKOVICH, J.V. $27.337.00 CONTRACTOR P2-25-IA �.'i_ .�. 0b5161--_---_-.---HOUSE-AF-DARTER-IF��•-- ---- -Si.159.50----.---BATTERIES•._._ ___. ..--. -•-•-.--_-----....---.-_•----..._-.- '• 1 'I 065162 P.S. HUGIIES CO.* INC. SR22.09 PAINT SUPPLIES ),.. 06516. IiUNT1NC:TON SUPPLY 126.92 SMALL HARDWARE " MONITORING EQUIPMENT•..--_..--.-- --- -- ----- .. 065165 IRVINE RANCH WATEP IIISTPICT $3.50 WATER USEAGE ) „! 065166 KAKAN PEA.RINGS K SUPPLY $138.36 BEARING SUPPLIES P65167 - - -.._. KAS SAFE-1y--.PRODUrTc -- -- - -- --. . . $15907..__. .------SAFETY SHOES .... .. .. ._ - --- 06516R KCENAN PIPE R SUFFI_Y CO. 1992.16 PIPE SUPPLIES 065169 KELLY PLUE UOOK $60.00 TECHNICAL JOURNAL ---...nE517P-•---------KING-HEAR-I-NG-.-1 MC,-- ----__-__-_--_-_ _ .-52s246:72----.----BEAR INO• SUPPLIES-- ' i 065171 KIRST PUMP S MACHIPE WORKS $3r7119.28 PUMP PARTS . j 065172 KLEEN-LINE CORP $148.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -INDUSTR.IAL- SUf $163.64..____.._.-__.-SMALL- HARDWARE ,-.-- .:i 065174 L.R.W.S.. INC. $124.69 WELDING SUPPLIES ) 0(•5175 LIGHTING DISTRIPUTOI%S. INC. $64.83 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065tT&--- L-OGAL -AGfNG•Y-FOPMATION--C-(}HN--- -------•- -•-5250.00-- --CSDOC-12-ANNEXATION P ROC US51NG-'FEE--(#57)--` --- 065177 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $14.66 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065171, MATERIAL HANDLING SUPPLY $95.40 SMALL HARDWARE 065181, PCMASTFR-CARR SUFFLY CO. $71.55 SMALL HARDWARE i 065181 PESA CONSOLIDATED V9TEP $6.66 WATER USEAGE �- 01.E1&z�_--.__1�GTRT�-•&EEC-IAL-T.}.E.�.-- --------_.`_._.._...___.. _. 5.38.81---- --------SMAtt-..HARDWARE------- .__ -...---.._.._--- -._.-...__._.-..-•--_ .. 0E�18: KILO FC.UIP("ENT C01•I . $39338.43 TRUCK PARTS 0E5184 PAUL A. HITCHELL $29.20 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE s \{I FUND NO 9190 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/83 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 C9UNT'1°---&A-NITA-T-I.ON-DIS-TRICTS -OF--ORAN6E'-EOUNTY----••- -- ..__----.---.__-----...---•--.--------• CLAIMS PAID O8/10/83 --WARRANT..-N0. ---- - ---VENOOR --- -- --- -------AM OUNT­--­------------ DESCRIPTION- --. - -- - --- - l• 065185 MONITEK• INC. $569.95 EQUIPMENT REPAIR KIT ' ---065186- HY89-NNIUSTRIE-S- 065187 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY $82.42 TRUCK TIRES 06518f; CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $2.50 WATER USEAGE ---0 65 1 8 5----•--- NORSKOf FLECTRIE VEHIGEf.S --- - ----s220:B7- -ELECTRIC CART- PARTS---------- 065190 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5480.94 TRUCK PARTS 065191 ORANGE COUNTY FIRE PPOTECTION $55.00 FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE ---06519-2 ---OP.ANGE--VAC•YE-&--F-Ii-i-1-M6--EB•.--------------• -3@01:59----- VAtVES------- --- - -n 6519! ORITEX CORP 5569.62 PIPE SUPPLIES 065194 CO. OF OPANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR S291854.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES ---PURCHASE-4MGD 165196 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $179463.30 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND V65197 PPG INDUSTRIES• INC. 55.884.65 PAINT SUPPLIES --06519f+- -PAG1-r-4-E-1EEHANIC-At--FUPf-E-Y--- ----5-347:22- -PUMP--PARTS-------- ------- • __.-_T_.__-.-_ 065197 PACIFIC STATES ELECTRIC WH`'LE. 519103.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065200 PACIFIC TELEPHONE $121.53 TELEMETERING ------06 52 0 1------FATIEGO•-A-1P.f- --- ------ ----- ----E323-s82-•-------EL•EGTRICAL-.SUPPLIES--------__...- 065202 FICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS S456.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 065203 HAROLD PRIMROSE 1CC s90.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE 65-204 914AHFI-00-EEEET-RIC SUPFEV ---$585-09-----E6EG-TRI-GAL--SUPPL-IES--•-------- ---- - 065205 RAINBOV DISPOSAL CO. 5282.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 065206 TFIE REGISTER $474.32 LEGAL ADVERTISING ---•---065207 THE-ODORE--ROD-INS--F-0kI1 -PARTS- - --- ------- ----_.___--..._--------•- - 06`201; RUSSCO CONSTRUCTION+ INC. ---- 51839140.46 CONTRACTOR 5-18R - -- - _ 065209 .10SEP14 T. RYERSON F. SON9 INC. $11500.04 PIPE SUPPLIES/STEEL STOCK --06521G- --�hNGON-INC-.------ --E3�658:50-- CONTRA&TOR--I-8R-1-- - •---- ---- 065211 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $29.68 OFFICE FORMS 065212 SANTA ANA DODGE $555.08 TRUCK PARTS -- 065213--- ---- -----SANTA-_ANA--ELECIPIG-POI0R6--- ---- -- -- - -- $15+73---------ELECTRIC-MOTOR PARTS- t. __.... .-- _ ._. .._..--..-- -.---..----•• (165214 SCHOLL B CO. ADVEPTISING $330.50 ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL STUDY 065215 FEAPS. ROEBUCK R CO. 5380.63 TOOLS ----06521-6-- ---SHAffPOCK--SUPPLY- --588.1:34-_-- TOOLS•-----_-..----.---•----.-•---------- 065217 SHEPHARD MACHINERY CO. $778.96 TRUCK PARTS 065216 SO. CALIF. COASTAL HATER RESEARCH PROJECT $210.00 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY • --------C6521-9-----------FOUTHEPN-CAL IF-.-fD1S0t+-GO.------------------- •- - •-- - -3234�485.49-----_....__.POWER---._----_.___.. 065220 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. $1.248.96 LINE DE-ENERGIZING 065221 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. 59.57 WATER USEAGE --066222- -SOUTHERN--GOUNT-IE 86-Ti98--- -DIESEL---FUEt _.. - --.-----___-_--_------------.--•---_ -_. 065223 STAROW STEEL 5149.41 STEEL STOCK 065224 SUNNEN PPODUCTS CO. 5448.18 PIPE SUPPLIES •• _.--0.6 5 2 2 5----.----_---.�.HE_.SUF'NLl.ERS.-_---- . __.._..5152.22-_.--.SMALL-HARDWARE-- •--------._._.-.----- _-.-------_-.-- ' : O6=226 J. WAYNE SYLVESTFP - - $367.12 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 065227 TAK TAKAKINE 5608.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE •' -_•-06522f! --T-AafL-OR-PIiNN--- ------------------------------S1i0v60- ------ELEGTR-IC- CART--PARTS----- __. .-------------___.-_-- .• 065229 TE.KMAR COMPANY $421.29 TRUCK PARTS 065230 THOMPSON BLUEPRINT S3.1A0.00 BLUEPRINTING I " ' t �'. FUND NO 919a - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/83 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 G ------ ------EOUN+Y-5-A-MITAT-ION---BL9fiR-IL�TS--OF-ORANOE-COUNTY- ------ -- -_ ---- ---- --"_..- -____ - {-'i, CLAIMS PAID 08/10/83 --WARRANT-_10.---- ---- --VENDOF- --__-___ _.—_.._----AMOUNT--- ---- -------- -DE SCR IP71ON---•-- ---------_ 065231 THOMPSON LACOUER CO. S585.31 PAINT SUPPLIES I' - ---4F52�32- --T.}IOR--TEMPORARY-SER�FI�S— ------ ---S352r0f1 TEMPORARY_.-HELP -- -- ------- ' --- ! 065233 TRAFFIC CONTROL SFPV1Cur INC. $766.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES 065234 TRANSArERICA OELAVAL• INC. $924.32 ENGINE PARTS �' OE52-34--_.------.T•ROJAN-FRA-TTERIES--- --- --------------.__-_-..-•5446s45------• -TRUCK-BATTERIES---__—.._.--_----------------_--.—. . 1 E' P6523E• TRUCK S AUTO SUF'PLY• INC. $1003.63 TRUCK PARTS C65237 J.G. TUCKER B S0019 INC. S299.16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065�3A UNION-61-� t0.-01---Of4`. ----t6i-08---GASOLINE------------ 065239 UNITED PARCEL SEFVICE S56.93 DELIVERY SERVICE jl 065240 VWR SCIENTIFIC 5Iv996.09 LAD SUPPLIES ,,. -----•-065241--___--V.eL-L€Y-6-1-71ES--SUFFEY -F-O. -- -----------3222.4E ---PIPE-SUPPL-IES_.._---- -...—__------- .__. _. _----------,. 06524e VdLVf. R STEEL SUIf`LY CO. $49108.79 VALVE SUPPLIES ; i CES243 JOHN R. WAPLES 5395.20 ODOR CONSULTING i' 0 6 52 4 4---• --WAUKE SI+A-ENG I NE---6F+V+(;F4•T-E•P---- -•856T699:53 ENO I NE-PARTS-- - --- --- ------__— — ;'�i C65245 WESMAR MARINE ELECTFOMICS $74.04 LAB SUPPLIES ii 065246 WESTERN WHOLESALE CC. S153.60 PIPE SUPPLIES 06524 $54P.02--------WEL•DINO.SUPPL-IES---- �'+ 065248 WHITE* FINE 8 VC.PVILLE S3o570.97 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY — --- �'� OF5249 J.L. WINGERT CO. $1.166.00 POLYMER PUMP F sev-9'20s50----LEGAL--3E-RV•I-CES----- ( 'i 065251 WRIGIIT LINE* INC. $19314#40 OFFICE SUPPLIES OE5252 XEROX CORP. 547.83 XEROX SUPPLIES -- 065253--- --- —Y T1R€ - -- -- ----- $951.03---- -TRUCK TIRES-- _._.. --- -- - ----- - - ----- ;. ! ----------------- I, ---- --- -- --�OTkL-EM-1*l�f�A-1$-Ofl1-}01R3----•-----E3-�f�14�335-:3D --- -------------------- --- - --- i ' i" L, I�" --- ti .• Cl — FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND -__ - PROCESSING DATE _ 08/08/83_-_P4GE- REPORT NUMBER AP43 �. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/83 SUMMARY AMOUNT _ #_1 OPER FUND S 4.20 • - -#1 ACO FUND --_. ----------•-25�. 12_-.�.- -----•-------------------- ----•-- ----- �. #2 OPER FUND 4,570.88 #2_ACO FUND 841.2_8 173 OPER FUND _ 453.04 -`----- ----------- -- - } #3 ACO FUND 2,669.63 d3 F/R FUND — -_-_ 750,000.00 --�$ OPER FUND 1 ,7�390- • #5 ACO FUND 183,327:47 -----#5_..F/R FUND 4_�T — __ --- -------— -- ----------- - #6 OPER FUND 50.02 (. •• #6 ACO FUND 163.71 •• N7 OPER FUND 3_,.399.46 2,Oblb9 N11 OPER FUND 2,249,.04 #11 ACO FUND 209_20 —75s-b OPER FUND 30.90 �•� #566 SUSPENSE FUND 14,535.58 ��•• #667 OPER FUND 2 947.76__ — 1 - - ---- ---- --- .._._.. - --- -- - -._._. U71••I----3T O��R'FUND — -- ----- -4Ti•1 ,107 19 CORF 143,412.57 I- SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND �•• SELF FUNDED -TTORKEn$r-COMP CIS JfR NCE FUND — - 12,970. 17 - ( �• JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 46,853.44 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/10/83 $1 ,614.335.30 FUND NO 9119 JT DIST WORKING-CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/22/83 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP43 C Olt Nj_Y_&"N I..T.A.T ION,..QI.S T R I r:I S. OF-OR ANGE._C_OU.N.TY___.__ CLAIMS PAIL) • WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT. -------- - . I. 065299 ALL-STATE VEHICLESs INC. S19224.92 VEHICLE LEASING • _065303 DEBRA E._ALkEfl____ ----.-..--*20*.0.0------CITI.Z-ENS--ADV-ISORY,-C.OMMI.T.TEE....... 065301 AMETEKp INC. 547.83 PIPE SUPPLIES 065302 V.D. ANDERSON 1192.81 VALVES 065303 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES 1 ---TOWEL_RE.NTAL...__ AQUA DEN CORP. S239137*23 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 06530 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. s99.64 TRUCK PARTS t 65306 SC SUPPLY9 C-o-INDUSTR.IAL- -1-W _1369.ai----SMALL-.HARDWARE..---.-.------ 0 65307 -MA-kaARET BAILEY S20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 0 65300 BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA $497.86 TRAVEL EXPENSES 2 65 30 9 KATHY FARBOUP • 065310 13ECKMAN INSTRUMENTS S936.26 REGULATOR PARTS 065311 BENTLEY NEVADA s460.89 PROXIMETER' __065 312 S-E V.C_o 3 2 1.2 7--B All E-R.I.E.S. • 06531.3 E%IERLY & ASSOCIATESt INC- $550.00 WORKERS COMP. ADMINISTRATOR 065314 BOOVS AIR CONDITIONING S103.19 TRUCK REPAIRS 065315 PICHAEL BRANDMAN & ASSOC.91NC I t 0 6 1 0.3-9- CSDOC J g.,3 E 1.R 065316 BRENTWOOD PRODUCTS S192.53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 065317 BUTLER ENGINEERING, INC. $159736.53 ENGR. P2-27, P2-23-6 CLAIM ­065318 C & P RELONDIIJONING Co. ___15 1.9-a 0_ PUtjl!- 065310 CPT CALIrORNIA, INC. S79.00 WORD PROCESSING REPAIRS 065321 CS COMPANY 554.09 VALVES 065321 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS ENGR.ULTIHATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL, 065322 CARUS CHEMICAL CO., INC. S19919*69 FEEDER RENTAL 1 065323 CHE14WEST INDUSTRIES, INC- S20078-42 FERRIC CHLORIDE c H r V R 0 N NC -*--- 3-9,4 U...q A -HE 065325 MANUEL CID $20.90 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065326 DAVID J. CLINE S20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065327 COAST INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COL_----------_-___. __S53.50...... -._SMALL_ HARDWARE...--_-.-- 06532A EDWARD F. COLBUPN S20*00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ld 965329 CONROCK COMPANY $29903.22 BUILDING MATERIALS CAL..SUPPL I E_S__... 065333 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS S19085.29 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 065332 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $209921.22 CHLORINE __ 065333 CONTROL__SPECIALIS T S I NC_. EQUIPMENT 65334 i'd RS, INC. 1262.46 TRUCK PARTS 065335 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $69483.10 ENGINE PARTS 0 6 5 3-41, V.c R-C-op.r ---1405.a5.-----EQU I.PMENT--RENTAL-._. 065337 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $64*70 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 065338 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $130.00 ANNEXATION 193 PROCESSING FEE N-A. DAliL sp CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 09534 ii-- DECO 5439.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065341 DORADO INTERPRISES9 TNC. $5-893*24 PLANT 91 , 92 REPAIRS 065342 DUNN M E W DS CORF. Lpi R 4.1,15 Ok is.--- _PA tN_T__5_U P P L-1 E 5 065343 E.D.A.WtINC. B K.P. LINDSTROM $29777.72 EIR ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL 065344 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP- CO. $19229.71 VALVE SUPPLIES i ' FUND NO 9194 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/22/83 PAGE 3 PFPORT NUMBER AP43 ' -.----_-._-- ---- COUMM-SANIT.AT_10N. 0ISJUCTS..9E._ORANGE _C.oUNL-_._--•----.___ __.__...------------------------------- a • CLAIMS PAID 08/24/83 • _-WARRAN7__N0. ---- YENDOP -__- _. -.A..4OU4T _-.-_-- ___________OESCRIP.TJ.ON.-----.-..----------_-------•-• 065391 OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE-CAERIER $500.00 OCEAN MONITORING • 392--_ ORAY_Q COyNT2L_A0O PARTS Ci:_ - _..--t1r721.tl3_---._._...�BUC.K.P_ARLS..-_-- -------.._-..---•----•---- -------..__. -__ 065393 ORANGE VALVE b FITTING CO. t733.83 VALVES 065394 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $109614.29 REPLENI-SH WORKERS' COMP. FUND --065395 - --- PPG INOM-81U9 - 06539F PACIFIC STATES ELECTRIC WHSLE. 1356.16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -- 065397 PACIFIC TELEPHONE 1,321.59 TELEMETERING bb AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES___ _•.______-..-.______-•-____ 065399 PARTS UNLIMITED $678.88 TRUCK PARTS �• 065401i PASCAL & LUDWIG 55.00 PLANS b SPECS REFUND 065401 _ PEAT. MARWTCKi MITCHELL _ -- -b C0._.__-____•_._..._-...___.-_ 2.�91.4.00___-. .-._-.- I982-8.3-..ANNUAL-.AUDJ.T_--__..___._... ____...... ... •� 065402 _ t'ICKNICK PAPER PRODUCTS $99.22 JANITORIAL •SUPPLIES ` ICI 065403 HAROLD PRIMROSE. ICE' t40.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE PRINTEC CORP. 065405 OUALIFTED ELFCTRIC SUPPLY 1241.30 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �. •• 06540E WALTER S. RADOS t20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ___065407 _- RAND COMPUTER CENTER 002...68_._... _.__....__..CSBOC.._16-._C_OHPUTE.R._.S.ERV.LCES.__,_.._.........._..._____.___.____ 065408 RE-CY-KLEEN CORP. - *86.49 TRUCK REPAIRS �• �• 06540Q THE REGISTER $29727.86 LEGAL ADVERTISING 065410 REPUBLIC ENGINES s63.0...38 TRU1:.K__P_ARIS - 065411 REPUBLIC NATIONAL LIFE S6,000.00 ANNUAL STOP-LOSS PREMIUM �. �,• : 06541P RICHARD•S HYDRAULICS t316.35 ENGINE PARTS 065413 TH_EODORE ROBINS-FORD ;22.rLS_. __--IRUCIC_PABT3..__.--__-_-__.-_-._.-__._.-. ROCCO•S TRUCK WRECKING $583.00 TRUCK PARTS 065415 RYAN-NERCO E415.94 PIPE SUPPLIES 0654.I6__-- --- J.OSEPH T. R�EF{SON A SONS INC• _ --I L .TO 100._1 _ _S.TEEL._S. CK-- _._.--------•.-- --------------•.---.._._.__.-. -65417 S & J CHEVROLET 5275.77 TRUCK PARTS 06541B SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $19535.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065410 SANTA ANA DODGE -62Z.95...-.-___.TRUCK_.PAItT-.5•_ ___• ____• -...-_--_ . - - ----SANT. ANA DO-•--------. _- ---- - - - - - 065420 SANTA ANA ELFCTRIC MOIOPS $145.96 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 065421 CITY OF SEAL -BEACH $14 . WATER USEAGE Ofi5.922-_ - SEAL METHODS. INC. ; .14 LUBItI.CAN.TS__ 065423 SERPEN71X CONVEYOR CORP. $19206.10 CONVEYOR ROLLERS 065424 SMALLER R LOHRo INC. t5.275.90 ENGR. 5-18R 065425 SHAMROCK SUPPLY _ _ ...t19120o.28 ........ TOOLS _ _._ _._ _. -....__-.. - . _. . . ° 065425 SHCPHARD MACN]NERY CO. $250.05 TRUCK PARTS 065427 J.R. SIEFEN t29.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1" P 06542P. HIL SMITH i I ._._-_--- __.------ ------- ---I--------- ---------- ----------.#29..00--------.CITIZENS ..ARV.ISO.RY_...COMMIITEE_---......- -._ _-------- ----L. Oh5429 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT t187.62 OFFICE MACHINES I" C65430 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $939326.85 POWER 065431 SO. CAL. GAS CO. - --- .E26�.165.�6..-_._._.. -- -NATt�8.94- G¢5..- - - _. _.. __,_.. _._. _. ._.. - ------ (••' 065432 -- 'SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $59812.12 DIESEL FUEL 065433 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATFF $743050 BOTTLED WATER 065434 STAROW STEEL_ 2_..------STEEL_S_TOCK._.__-_ -•---•---•-_---..- --.__--- -•• 065435 SCOTT STEVENS_ t135.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 065436 SUPERIOR METAL FABRICATORS $5.00 PLANS b SPECS REFUND -- - --- - -------- - ---- -----'---------- -------�� ------' - ---- - - ------ --� -- -n� -------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 11ad MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING September 28, 1983 - 4:00 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of September 14, 1983, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Don Saltarelli, Dan Griset DIRECTORS ABSENT: Harriett Wieder STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary Staff Report on Long-Range The Assistant General Manager reviewed the 5-year Financing Requirements financial projections for the District and highlighted the anticipated shortfalls in both operating and capital funds during this period. Because of rapidly escalating costs to meet federal and state-mandated treatment requirements, revenues from current sources will be inadequate, and the District faces a serious financial problem that unless resolved could jeopardize the District's fiscal integrity. Mr. Sylvester then briefly outlined the financing alternatives available to the Board for supplementing ad valorem tax revenues to meet operating and capital requirements. The Board entered into a discussion of the merits of the various financing alternatives as well as the procedural requirements and timetables involved in implementation of a user fee program. Directing staff to proceed with It was moved, seconded and duly carried: planning for implementation of a user fee program and approving That the staff be directed to proceed with tentative timetable planning for implementation of a special assessment (user fee) to be collected on the property tax bill beginning with the 1984-85 fiscal year; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the preliminary timetable for development and implementation of a user fee to be collected on the property tax bill dated September 28, 1983, be, and is hereby, approved. Minutes of Adjourned Regular Meeting - District 1 September 30, 1983 Page Two Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:10 p.m. • Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California RFPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN OCTOBER 12, 1983 REPORT ON YOUR TRIP TO WASHINGTON TO APPEAR BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER RESOURCES ON SEPTEMBER 22. ------------------------------ MENTION THE FOLLOWING UPCOMING COMMITTEE MEETINGS: BUILDING COMMITTEE - TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18 AT 5: 30 P. M. DISTRICT 13 w Q-.Q q, � STEERING COMMITTEE - T-MMZ)UAY', OCTOBER .� AT 5: 30 P. m , (TENTATIVE - ASK COMMITTEE MEMBERS IF THIS IS A CONVENIENT DATE) ------------------------------ CALL A MEETING OF THE FXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5: 30 P.M. , WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25TH AND INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSION DON ROTH AND CHU7KqYLVIA OR JOHN THOMAS OR HILL VARDOULIS MEETING DATE October 12, 1983TIME •7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT I JOI"!T ROARDg SCRANK) . . . . . . .HANSON. . .. . . ✓ 4MAC AILISTER), BAILEY. . , , , , ✓ `GRISETS, , . , . . .LUXEMBOURGER ADLER , , , , . , .BROWN. . . , , , ,JG (HOESTEREY). . . .SALTARELLI . , (NELSONj. . , . . . .000PER. . . . . ._L/ (STANTON). . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . �C PERRY). . . . . , ,CULVER. . . . . .� HOESTEREYS,. . , EDGAR. . . , , , ._y� DISTRICT 2 EDWARDS). . . . . .FINLAYSO _ ISEIDEL). . . . . . .FRESE. . , . . . . MURPHY), . , . . .WEDAA. . . . . . ._� SRISNER). . . . . . .GRGAS. . . . . . OVERHOLTS, , . . .ROTH. .. . . . . . DAVIS . . . . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . . ..�G ADLER)t. . . . . .BROWN.. . . . . . (CRANK)tt. , , , . . .HANSON. . . . . . (NELSO O. . . . : , .COOPER. . . . . . (MAURE0. . . . . , ,HART, , . , , , . .�� (KUZNIK). . . . . . .HOLT. . . , . . . ,�G KUZNIK), . , , . , ,HOLT, , , . . . . ._!/ ODLUM) . . , . . . .KAWANAMI . , , , CRANK , . , , , . , ,HUTCH I SON. .., GRISETS. , . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER� ODLUM�. , , , , , . , KAWANAMI . , , . CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY. . . . GRISET). . . . . . .LUXEMB0URGERJL BEYER). . . . , . .SMITH, . . . , . , RELL)). . . , . , . ..MARSHOTT, , . . HOLM BERGS, . , . ,WEDEL, . , . . , , LACAYOl. , . ., . .MULLEN. . . , . , STANTON)• , , , , .WIEDER. . , . , .� COOPER . , , . , ,NELSON. . , . , ,_y� CATLIN , , . . . . . , , . , .�G MAC AL! ISTER�.PATTINSON. . . 41 HEATHER).. . . . .PLUMMER.. . .. •✓" DISTRICTE OVERHOLT� . . . ,ROTH. . . . . . .. HOEST REY).. . .SALTARELLI „ EDWARD$). . . . . .FINLAYSON. , , ✓ BEYER). , , , , . .SMITH, . . , , , , ✓ LACAYQ). , . . . . .MULLEN. , , . , ._QL SELVAG IS, . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . .? ADLERI). , . . . . . .BROWN. . . . . . .�G MANDI � THOMAS, , . , , . PER . . . . . . .CULVER. , .. , .�,G AGRAN , , ,VARDOULIS, , . -_ SEIDEL�. . , . . . ,FRESE, , . , . . . / GREEN)))))) , . , , , , ,WAHNER. . . . . . RISNER . . . . , , ,GRGAS. . . . . . . ae MURPHYS" . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . .�_ DAVIS) . . . , . . .GRIFFIN. . . , ,�G HOLMBERGS, . , . .WEDEL, , , . , . ,_LG GRIS TS. . . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER� STANTON). . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . ..iG RELL�. , , . . . . .MARSHOTT, . , , CATLIN). . . . . . .Wi#FER . . . . .-iG COOPERS. . . , . ,NELSON. , . . . . ✓ OVERHOLTS, . , , ,ROTH, , , , . . . . / (SELVAGGI ), . , , ,SYLVIA. . .. . ._�G (MANDIC), . . . . .THOMAS. . . . . .� HOLMBERGS, , , , .WEDEL. . . . , . , ANTON). . . . . .WIEDER. . . , , , ✓ STAFF: \owl (CATLIN). . . . . . .W+*T-eRS HARPER. . . . . . SYLVESTER. , , DISTRICT 5 LEWIS, . , . , , , CLARKE. ., . . , (MAURER). . . . . . .HART. . . . . . . ._ DAWES. , . . . , . (HEATHER). . . . . .PLUMMER. . . . .JG ANDERSON. . . . (STANTON). . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . ._L/ BUTLER. , , , , . BROWN. , , , . , , DISTRICT 6 BAKER, . . . , , . KYL E (CRANK) . . . . . ..HUTCHISON. . .JG YOUNG, , . . , . . (MAURERS . . . .HART, a , . . , . .�G (STANTONS, , , , ,. , .WIEDER. . , , , ._�L OTHFRS: WOODRUFF. , , , DISTRICT 7 HOHENER. . . , , HOWARD. . . . . . BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . ✓ HUNT. , , , . , , , MAURER). . . . . . . HART. . . . . . . . Ale' KEITH. , , . , . , (HOESTEREY). . . .EDGAR. . . . . . , KNOPF, . . . . . , (GRISET). . . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER LE BLANC. . , , (AGRAN). . . 6 . . . .VARDOULIS. . . LINDSTROM. . , GREEN), . , . . , ,WANNER. . , , . . LYNCH, . . . , , , (STANTONS. ., . . ,WIEDER. . . . . .. MARTINSON. . . PEARCE. . . , . , DISTRICT 11 (MAC ALLISTER),BAILEY. . . . , . (STANTON). . . . . .WIEDER. . . , , . (MAC ALLISTER).PATTINSON. . , i/ ,,,d 9/28/93 1 OCTOBER 12, 1983 JOINT MEETING NOTES #4 - Recognition of persons to wish to be heard ri1 k Chairman Holt recognized Director Barbara Brown who introduced her daughter, Samantha. Mr. Holt also recognized Jack Urick from Allied Chemical Company who indicated he wished to speak to the Directors in connection with agenda item No. 9 (k) - �` award of Specification No. P-060, Liquid or Special Emulsion, Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent #7 (a) - Report of the Joint Chairman Chairman Holt reported on his recent trip to Washington, D.C. Said it was an exciting and fruitful trip. He indicated he & Assistant GM met with Lee White, Legal Counsel in Washington, and went over the logistics. Also met with Congressman Packard who is a very exciting individual and he is moving this matter forward. Mr. Holt reported that he, JWS, Lee White and our scientist, Doug Segar, all testified before the House Subcommittee on Water Resources on September 22nd. Want to get this as a part of the Clean Water Act rather than an amendment to the Act. Said they were all well prepared when they appeared before Subcommittee. Congressman Strangeland from Minnesota was present at hearing also. Congressman Packard asked them key questions. Congressman Robert ' Roe, Chairman of the Committee, was the key person they had to convince. Mr. Holt advised that they also visited several Congressmembers' offices--Congressmen Patterson, Badham and Andersen. Weren't able to see them but did see Congressman William Dannemeyer. He had a lot of questions and he was prepared to do a letter to be sent to Congressman Packard's office, which he did, urging him to include in the Clean Water Act this type of water research. Holt reiterated that he felt this trip was very fruitful. Feel that if we are going accomplish this, we are going to have to do it this year. Also had lunch with Bud Ehler of the NOAA organization, and he was very positive and willing to continue their funding portion with just a slight reduction in amount. Feel we still have strong support from them. The Joint Chairman then mentioned the upcoming Committee meetings which are scheduled as follows: Building Committee - Tuesday, October 18th, at 5:30 p.m. District 13 Steering Committee - Wednesday, October 19th, at 5:30 p.m. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, October 26th, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Don Roth and Charles Sylvia to attend and participate in the discussions. #7(b) - Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper reported on his recent trip to the Peoples' Republic of China as a member of a special wastewater technology delegation to a technical program held there sponsored by People to People International. He indicated that there were 26 technicians in both the water and wastewater fields. Really did work. There -� wasn' t much sightseeing, and some of the ladies were very disappointed. Were in four of the largest cities in China and two industrial cities. Very fascinating trip. Went 2,500 miles by bus or train. Areas were toward eastern portion of China. About 75 million people in those regions. Their priorities are more basic than ours. Mr. Harper then gave a slide presentation of some of the highlights of his trip. $7 (c) - Report of the General Counsel TLW reported that there was one item of litigation which would be discussed in closed session later in the agenda. He briefly reported that he had attended a meeting of the AMSA Attorneys Committee in Atlanta the previous week which was very worthwhile. #9(k) - Award of Specification No. P-060 (Removed from Consent Calendar) The Chairman referred this item to Blake Anderson, Director of Operations, who then recognized Jack Urick from Allied Chemical. He addressed the Board and reviewed the background of this specification. Said the Districts ran quality trials evaluating various polyelectrolytes to rebid for another year's requirements. Allied Chemical was one of the participants. Said as he understood it, the Districts went through a long process of trialing and identified performance characteristics from each vendor participating. Those performance figures, in combination with prices supplied and active ingredient content, determine the total cost to use that particular chemical for the next year. He indicated that he understood that award to Aqua Ben was going to be recommended for the next year's contract. Mr. Urick then read a quote from page 5 of the specifications. Said the bid of Aqua Ben was bid at a solids content ranging between 6.3% and 6.7% with an average of 6.5% used to compute total cost of the chemical. During and after trial, several samples of Aqua Ben were tested. Some were 6.2% and 6.8% and the third was substantially below which appeared to be a sampling error. The point he wanted to make was that the bid requires sample to be within sampling range. 6.2% and 6.8% are not within 6.3% to 6.7% range. The product that was tested and sampled supposedly was made from the same batch of material so there seems to be a substantial variation between products that came from the same lot produced by Aqua Ben. With the 7hC price per pound and by lowering 1/10 of a percent, it will cost the Districts over $60,000 in additional expenses. Specifications give a certain range and the two samples were outside that range. Seemed to be a wide range of solids content within that same batch and smaller percent of active ingredients could cost the District a lot of money. Mr. Urick asked the Board to disqualify Aqua Ben and award to Allied Chemical. Director Cooper stated that as a lay person he didn't understand this procedure. Appears that District determined the performance value, which was very meticulously arrived at. Supplier put forth in their bid a price for product as it comes and the range of active ingredient content is different. Mr. Urick commmented that samples that were trialed determined the performance numbers and they didn't abide by the letter of the document. This material was supposed to -2- be from one batch of chemicals and it had a wide range of active ingredients. Cooper then asked if this material would not perform consistently, and Mr. Eurich replied that he guessed that it would not. Are talking about $900,000 worth of chemicals a year . Director Roth stated that he thought before they could do anything more, should hear from the staff and their response to Allied. Blake Anderson reported that the trialing was conducted by Operations and Engineering staff. Results were analyzed in our Lab which is certified by the State of California. Said we recognize there is some product variability which was consistent in Ldll trials. 1/10% drop costs $60,000 but 1/10% up saves $60,000 also. We think that any product will have some minor variability in the active ingredients. We compared the two products and it is our judgment that the two products are the same. Will be testing the product from time to time to be sure it is the same product which we trialed. We are confident that Aqua Ben will provide a good product during the year and will meet performance standards reach during the trial. Staff recommends the low bidder be awarded this contract. TLW added that each bidder provided significant quantities. We purchased all of the polymers - sixteen 55-gallon drums. Used 10 of the 16 drums. Allied had complained re quality of active ingredients so we went to unused barrels and matched against trialing analysis and bid numbers in bid document. All 16 barrels were in the same lot and averaged 6.58%. Bid was 6.5% The various polymer products that we trialed vary in makeup so had to go through extensive trialing to understand qualities. Director Catlin indicated that the specifications seem somewhat misleading. Luxembourger asked what is causing this fluxuation--storage, age or what? Blake replied that both of those factors can cause this. Luxembourger asked if we had looked into other products. BPA advised that we have used another Aqua Ben product which they have been supplying for two years. They have met or exceeded trialing performance on that product during the past two years. Director Wedaa asked if Aqua Ben is our current supplier and was advised, yes, but that is for a different product. Asked if this is a fixed price contract and staff replied that it was. Culver asked what happens with this polymer? BPA indicated that it is a flocculent aid. Takes our digested sludge and forms into flocculent particals which are put on belt press prior to transporting to Coyote Canyon. He added that the physical characteristics are different and the products vary significantly from one another. Holt asked if the performance characteristics are spelled out in the bid spec. Blake replied yes. He then asked if those ingredients have anything to do with active ingredients and BPA stated yes. Ran the trials with thick polymers and dilluted it to a very thin solution and used that to calculate dosage tests to meet minimum requirements. Finlayson asked if there was a penalty for nonconformance? BPA replied, yes, if first load doesn't comply with bid, there is a warning. If 2nd load doesn't, could cancel contract and go to second low bidder. Is a one-year contract. r.. It was then MOVED AND SECONDED to approve staff's recommendation to award to the low bidder, Aqua Ben. -3- Director Hart asked if the staff had received any other complaints from other companies? Blake indicated that they all came in to look at trialing results and to assure that techniques used were adequate and we did have questions about it but no complaints. Mr. Urick then stated that he felt the average of samples matching up to average of specifications is irrelevant. Staying within range is more important. A second point he wanted to make was that because Aqua Ben has satisfactorily served the Districts in the past, it does not set a precedent with this type of product. Is irrelevant in this case. Furthermore, we should have intregrity in the system so that when we set guidelines and rules, that they are met by the people who want to participate in the bid. Have to be within the specifications. In this case, it is out of the specifications. Think the bids are very close. We are talking about maintaining the integrity of the system. Holt reiterated that the staff's recommendation had been moved and seconded. If Aqua Ben does not meet specifications, will be awarded to second bidder. VOICE VOTE on motion. MOTION CARRIED. Chairman Holt thanked Mr. Urick for his interest and participation. /ill - LA/OMA Citizens' Advisory Committee Mr. Harper referred to report given to Directors at the last meeting re activities on the LA/OMA sludge study. Called on Blake Anderson to report. Blake advised that the Sanitation Districts participated in a multi-year sludge study that ended in 1980. We have been in the process of completing a formal EIR and Facilities Plan that will address the specific problems of a 20-year sludge plan for the Sanitation Districts. We have appointed a Citizens' Advisory Committee which has met on a number of occasions to help make suggestions regarding a public participation program required in order to get adequate funding. Referred to letter mailed with agenda from Chairman of the Committee who had a number of recommendations on the public participation program. Then referred to the Schedule included in the Directors' folders which lays out in detail what the staff and Committee believe will be elements of a program of public participation. Are drafting an EIR and will hopefully result in a final determination by this Board and EPA. Pointed out several items on schedule that were checked and briefly explained those particular requirements. He indicated that they will continue to brief the Directors at the regular November Board Meeting. Will have engineering consultant present to explain various alternatives to Directors. Mr. Harper commented that though this is a lot of red tape, it is worth the results that can be accomplished by getting the public involved in the final decision that the Board makes. With regard to the 301(h) waiver, it is important for EPA and the State to see that we can complete and accomplish what we have to. We have a good committee working on this but will keep Directors informed. Vardoulis suggested regarding the public participation workshops that we might combine the El Toro and Irvine ones like we did once before. Blake advised that the Commitee had specifically requested us to separate them. Added that the Committee is made up of 15 citizens and meets every Tuesday or every other Tuesday evening. It was then MOVED and SECONDED to approve said schedule. MOTION CARRIED. -4- FAH referred to one of the items suggested in the Chairman's letter re newspaper inserts. Showed Directors what we did in 1975 when working on a Master Plan that was going to be federally funded. Was in the LA Times and Santa Ana Register. Didn' t know what it cost then but for what Committee has in mind now, the cost is something like $45,000. Are several concerns. We are going out to different Districts saying we need a user fee. Will be going to District 1 in the next several months and am concerned someone might feel this is rather excessive and District 1 people might be upset. Have suggested to EPA and State that as they will be paying 87�%, will put that information on the front of the ad so we won't get the criticism. Part of this can be prepared by the consultant and another section that describes the Districts' activities involves staff time. Don't don't believe we can meet the schedule as he didn't know if the people who have to be involved really have the time to do it. Said he realized that this is a cornerstone of the Citizens' Committee program but maybe the information they would like to put out could be handled in another way. Certainly could put ads in the paper but just make that comment. If we are talking $45,000 we would need Board action. Said his recommendation is that this is subject to State and EPA approval. Wedaa MOVED that staff be directed to investigate alternative approaches and costs associated therewith and get back to Directors. MOTION SECONDED. Smith asked if we were still going to contact EPA and was told, yes. Wedaa stated that he buys printing like this for much less and asked that the staff call him tomorrow for some information. Hart suggested the MOTION be AMENDED to give the Executive Committee the authority to vote on the 26th on alternative approaches. Wedaa agreed. Perry stated he thought it was a waste of time to put it in the LA Times because nobody will read it. Called for the question. VOICE VOTE on AMENDED MOTION to refer to Executive Committee. MOTION CARRIED. #23 - DISTRICT 2 - Substitution of security re Annexation 53 TLW referred to report mailed with agenda. Said he received some additional material just prior to meeting that night--Title Report, etc. Haven't reviewed them yet. Said this appears a bit more complex than first imagined. Property in question has been subjected to a lot of liens. District should not have to bare the burden of the legal expenses and staff expenses. Will be the obligation of the developer. Approval was then moved, seconded and carried. -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3, S, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA � f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON OCTOBER 12, 1933 A O .-- --- H v � O C a ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA _ ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on October 12, 1983 at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 ai�ll as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank x Robert Luxembourger, Chairman pro tem Dan Griset x Don Saltarelli Ronald Hoesterey x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry Wedaa, Chairman Todd Murphy x Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Barbara Brown Marvin P. Adler x Sam Cooper Carrey Nelson x Donald Holt Robert Ruznik x Carol Rawanami William Odlum x Robert Luxembourger Dan Griset x Bob Perry Norman Culver x Don Smith Gene Beyer x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton Duane Winters x Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: x Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Roland Edwards a Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tem Otto Lacayo x Barbara Brown Marvin P. Adler x Norman Culver Bob Perry x Henry Frese Norma Seidel gad a Victor Grgas Joyce Risner x Don Griffin Jesse Davis x Robert Luxembourger Dan Griset x Frank Marshott Charles J. Rell x Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper x Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Charles Sylvia Anthony R. Selvaggi x John A. Thomas Robert P. Mandic, Jr. x Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton Duane Winters x Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Philip Maurer x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Jacqueline Heather x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Elvin Hutchison, Chairman Orma Crank x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem Philip Maurer x Richard Edgar Ronald Hoesterey x Robert Luxembourger Dan Griset x Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran x James Wahner Harry Green x Harriett Wieder Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister x Harriett Wieder, Chairman pro tem Roger Stanton a Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister -2- 10/12/83 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Tom Dawes, Bill Clarke, Blake Anderson, Ray Young, Rita Brown, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle lr,) OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Walt Howard, Milo Keith, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, John Mancini, Samantha Brown, Jack Orick, Greg Allen DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, or the adjourned meeting held September 28, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 14, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt reported that he and Report of the Joint Chairman the Assistant General Manager testified in Washington, D.C. on September 22, 1983 before the O.S. House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Water Resources. The purpose of the testimony was to convince the Subcommittee to incorporate the -3- 10/12/83 Districts' research project on deep ocean disposal of sludge directly into the Clean Water Act, which is currently under review in the Congress. Chairman Holt advised the Directors that Lee White, the Districts' legal counsel in Washington, D.C., had arranged a meeting with Congressman Packard, a member of the Subcommittee, prior to the testimony to solicit his support for the project. The Congressman, who represents the southern portion• of Orange County and northern San Diego County, was quite supportive of the Districts' request during the hearing. Holt also indicated that they had met with Congressman Dannemeyer of Fullerton, who expressed his strong support for the project, and had also attempted to visit Congressmen Patterson, Badham and Andersen, but were unable to meet with them due to schedule conflicts. Chairman Holt further reported that they met with Mr. Bud Ehler from the NOAA Office of Marine Pollution Assessment, and were advised that NOAA intended to continue to fund their participation in the project during the coming Federal fiscal year, although at a slightly reduced level. The Joint Chairman felt, in summary, that the trip was quite productive and expressed hope that our continuing efforts in Washington regarding this key project would pay off in the near future. Chairman Holt called the Directors' attention to the Building Committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 18, at 5:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative offices. He also indicated that a meeting of the District 13 Steering Committee had been tentatively scheduled for Thursday, October 20, at 5:30 p.m., but advised that the staff would contact the Directors individually to establish a firm date, time and location for the meeting. Joint Chairman Holt then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, October 26, at 5:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative offices, and invited Directors Don Roth and Charles Sylvia to attend and participate in the discussions. far/ ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager delivered a slide Report of the General Manager presentation regarding his recent trip to the Peoples' Republic of China as a member of a technical delegation of water supply and wastewater management professionals sponsored by People-to People International. Mr. Harper indicated that the 26-member delegation had visited four of China's largest cities as well as two industrial cities, and had exchanged ideas and discussed problems with water supply and wastewater management officials in these cities as well as federal officials from the Chinese environmental protection organization. He advised the Directors that while the problems faced by the Chinese are more basic than ours, the Chinese are strongly committed as a nation to solving their water supply and wastewater management problems, and are working 24 hours a day in several of the facilities he visited to complete construction on upgraded treatment systems. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that he Report of the General Counsel chaired a meeting of the AMSA Attorney's Committee in Atlanta, Georgia early in October. The committee continued its discussion of the EPA construction grant program audit appeal procedures. He also called the Directors' attention to an item regarding litigation that would be addressed in closed session later in the meeting. -4- 10/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B" and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 9/07 83 9 08 83 9/21/83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $382,403.01 $ --- $216,715.34 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 373,964.80 ---- 222,660.41 Joint Working Capital Fund - 42,796.61 25,818.95 36,672.62 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,734.48 --- 3,168.80 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- 1,760.30 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,468.17 --- 32,863.14 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 7,903.72 --- 21,374.55 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 84,551.42 --- 9,197.80 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,639.74 --- 1,756.25 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 1,300.91 ---- 4,339.35 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,864.00 --- 8,862.85 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 22.50 --- 933.99 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,006.88 --- --- $904,656.24 $25,818.95 $560,305.40 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. I-2R-1 specifications for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase I, Adams Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Job No. I-2R-1, authorizing an addition of $1,881.41 to the contract with George Miller Construction Company for repair of six manhole benches and sealing of clay pipe joints under Flood Control Channel, be and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Job No. PW-108 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-155, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Sludge and Digester Gas Piping, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-108, to Riewit Pacific Company in the amount of $87,866.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Job No. PW-110 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-156, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Supplemental Chlorination at Headworks "C", Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-110, to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $58,179.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -5- 10/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of One (1) Four-Wheel Forklift Truck, That the Boards of Directors hereby Specification No. A-115 receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award purchase of One (1) Four-Wheel Forklift Truck, Specification No. A-115, to McKinley Equipment Corporation in the amount of $10,269.00 plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase order to Specialized Testing Service for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized testing services to issue a purchase order to Specialized Testing Service in the amount of $12,500.00 for testing services to evaluate varying of the coupling stiffness between the engine and gear box to resist torsional damage to said gear boxes at the Plant No. 1 blower building. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Leucadia County Water District for Associate Membership That the Boards of Directors hereby in the SCCWRPA adopt Resolution No. 83-157, approving the Leucadia County Water District, Administrator of the Encina Joint Powers Agreement, for Associate Membership in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lee & Ro certification re final negotiated fee d.d Consulting Engineers re with Lee & Ro Consulting Enginers for Job No. P2-5R-2 design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins "F" & "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers re engineering That the Boards of Directors hereby services for P2-5R-2 adopt Resolution No. 83-158, approving agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for engineering services re design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins "F" & "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-SR-2, on an hourly-rate basis, for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with John Carollo certification re final negotiated fee Engineers re Job No. P2-26 with John Carollo Engineers for consulting services during the construction of Primary Basins "P" & "Q" at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -6- 10/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for consulting That the Boards of Directors hereby services re Job No. P2-26 adopt Resolution No. 83-159, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for consulting services during construction of Primary Basins "P" & "Q" at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, for a fixed fee of $1,900.00 plus direct labor and indirect overhead in the amount of $12,380.00, for a total amount not to exceed $14,280.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 12368 to That Change Order A to Purchase Order Interox America re Specification No. 12368 to Interox America, re No. P-054 Specification No. P-054, increasing the total amount from $14,000 plus tax to $43,445.00 for supplying hydrogen peroxide, technical services and equipment rental for odor and sulfide control evaluation at Plant No. 1 belt filter press facility, and for continued use at Plant No. 2, pending receipt of competitive bids for a long-range supply contract and analysis of equipment purchase options, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Supplying Ferric Chloride, Specification That the bid tabulation and No. P-059 recommendation to award purchase order contract for Supplying Ferric Chloride, specification No. P-059, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That award of said contract to Imperial West Chemical Company for the unit price of $.092255 per dry pound, for a total amount not to exceed $276,765.00 including tax and freight, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman called on Blake Awarding contract for Liquid or Anderson, Director of Operations, to Special Emulsion, Polyelectrolyte describe the complex set of trials Chemical Flocculent, Specification employed by the staff to establish No. P-060 dosage rates and product specifications for five polyelectrolyte chemical flocculent materials (polymers) used to aid in dewatering the Districts' digested sludges. Mr. Anderson then recognized Jack Urick, Sales Manager, Water Treatment Chemicals, Allied Chemical Company, Morristown, New Jersey. Mr. Urick, whose company was the second lowest bidder after Aqua Ben, Inc., of Orange, California, discussed certain technical aspects of the bid specifications such as dosage rates and emulsion solids contents. He advised the Directors that in his opinion, certain samples of the low bidder's product appeared to deviate from the specifications, although the average solids content of the selected polymer was within the range of the specifications. He then asked the Directors to reject the low bid and award the bid to Allied Chemical. After a detailed explanation of the testing procedures, Mr. Anderson responded to various technical questions from the Directors, and asked Mr. Woodruff, the Districts' General Counsel, to outline the provisions of the contract to be -7- 10/12/83 signed by the Districts and the low bidder. Mr. Woodruff advised the Directors that the performance specifications and detailed performance requirements were incorporated directly into the contract. He further recommended that the Directors follow the staff's recommendation and award the contract to Aqua Ben because the contract contained sufficient authority to allow the Districts to terminate the contract in the event of non-performance by Aqua Ben. Mr. Anderson then assured the Directors that the product received would be routinely tested and the results compared against the specifications. In the event the vendor's product twice failed to comply with the specifications, the Districts could cancel the one-year contract and award the contract to the second low bidder. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award a purchase order contract for Liquid or Special Emulsion, Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-060, to Aqua Ben Corporation for the unit price of $.075 per wet pound, for a total amount not to exceed $945,000.00 plus applicable sales tax for the period October 15, 1983 through October 14, 1984. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Boards' action of May 11, 1983, authorizing General Manager That the Boards of Directors hereby amend to negotiate and issue a purchase the Boards' action of May 11, 1983, order re Job No. P1-19-4 authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for purchase of Pipe and Fittings for Replacement of a Plant Water Line at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-4, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00. This action is revised to include issuance of purchase orders for the pipe and fittings and for the installation of said pipe, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager called upon Blake Staff Status Report re Citizens' Anderson, Director of Operations, to Advisory Committee review the status report from the Chairman of the Districts' Citizens' Advisory Committee (CAC) on the LA/OMA Ultimate Solids Disposal project. Mr. Anderson recounted the events resulting in the formation of the Committee in June of 1983, and indicated that the purpose of the Committee was to solicit and incorporate public participation into the Districts' decision making process regarding this complex project. Anderson called the Directors' attention to a schedule of events included in the Directors' packets that sets forth the critical tasks and associated deadlines to be met to carry out the CAC Public Participation Program and complete a supplemental EIR and final Facilities Plan for this project. The General Manager pointed out that resolution of a 20-year solution to our sludge disposal problem was intertwined with our 301(h) waiver request. He indicated that the EPA and the State were monitoring our public participation efforts closely to ensure that we present the alternatives identified in the LA/OMA report to affected members of the public to advise them of the disposal alternatives available to us and elicit their comments. Mr. Harper advised the Directors that the staff would be updating the Directors of the progress of the Committee and the EIR review process each month. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Citizens' Advisory Committee, EIS/EIR and Facilities Plan Schedule is hereby approved. -8- 10/12/83 Mr. Harper further advised the Directors of the requirements for full notification of the community for all Federally funded projects, and showed the Directors a copy of a newspaper insert published in the Register and the Times by the Districts for a grant-funded project in 1977. Since the cost of publishing this insert was in excess of $45,000 in 1977, Mr. Harper recommended that the Boards refer the matter back to EPA and the State for direction. Following a discussion among the Directors it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff investigate alternative approaches to publishing a newspaper insert publicizing the project and identify the costs of these alternatives to the Boards for action. FURTHER MOVED: That the Executive Committee is hereby authorized to select an appropriate alternative at its October 26, 1983 meeting and direct the staff to proceed in implementation of the alternative. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on September 28, 1983, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving revised Procedures for the Selection of Professional That the revised Procedures for the Engineering and Architectural Selection of Professional Engineering Services and Architectural Services, be, and are hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Natel & Company for consulting services That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-161, approving agreement with Natel & Company for consulting services to assist in the planning, design, selection and installation of a new telephone system, for a total amount not to exceed $16,000.00 for Phase I and Phase II work. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Motion to convene in closed session to Convene in closed session re meet with management representatives personnel_ matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 at 9:08 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:34 p.m. , the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing settlement of lawsuit re Case No. 38-.80-61, Quasim Ali Authorized the settlement of the lawsuit Mirza against the Districts, Case No. 38-80-61, Quasim Ali Mirza vs. Ray Lewis/County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al. by the payment of the total amount of $10,000 in exchange for a full release; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Counsel and the General Manager, or their . designees, be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to execute any and all documents necessary to effect said settlement. -9- 10/12/83 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carrried: Receive and file Selection Commit- tee certification re final nego- That the Selection Committee tiated fee with Envirosphere certification re final negotiated fee Company re_preparation of an with Envirosphere Company for consulting Environmental Impact Report services re preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Enviro- sphere for consulting services re That the Boards of Directors hereby preparation of an Environmental adopt Resolution No. 83-165-5, approving Impact Report agreement with Envirosphere for consulting services re preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6, based on hourly rates and overhead, for an amount not to exceed $7,440.00 plus outside services not to exceed $2,000.00, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $9,440.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m., October 12, 1983. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment �..d That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , October 12, 1983. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County 'Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m., October 12, 1983. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file comments received re the Notice mailed re preparation That the comments received relative to of Environmental Impact Report the Notice mailed re preparation of Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Draft Environ- mental Impact Report on the Updated That the Draft Environmental Impact and Consolidated Master Plan of Report on the Updated and Consolidated Trunk Sewers Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -10- 10/12/83 DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Manager to file a Notice of Completion_ of the Draft_ That the General Manager be, and is Environmental Impact Report re hereby, authorized to file a Notice of Updated and Consolidated Master Completion of the Draft Environmental Plan of Trunk Sewers Impact Report on the- Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing November 28, 1983 as the final date for comments to That the Boards of Directors hereby be received on Draft Environmental approved establishing November 28, 1983, Impact Report re Updated and as the final date for which all comments Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk must be received on Draft Environmental Sewers Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11. DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fixing November 9, 1983, for public hearing on the Draft Environmental That November 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , in Impact Report re Updated and the Districts' Administrative Office, be Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk the approved date, time and place for Sewers public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment to Agreement `ark for Deferral of Annexation Fees re That the Board of Directors hereby approve Annexation No. 53 - Borrow Pit Amendment to Agreement for Deferred Annexation Payment of Annexation Fees in connection with Annexation No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation to District No. 2, as requested by The Goeden Company, proponents of said annexation, authorizing a substitution of security re said agreement. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:37 p.m. , October 12, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:37 p.m., October 12, 1983. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to Agree- ment with Lowry & Associates re That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Contract No. 3-24-1 Resolution No. 83-162-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, providing for payment for soils investigation and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of -11- 10/12/83 $2,150.00 and $1,930.00, respectively, increasing the total contract from $35,000.00 to $39,080.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to Agree- ment with Lowry & Associates re That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Contract No. 3-24-2 Resolution No. 83-163-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, providing for payment for soils investigation and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of $1,900.00 and $1,930.00, respectively, increasing the total contract from t $22,000.00 to $25,830.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to Agree- ment with Lowry & Associates re That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Contract No. 3-25 Resolution No. 83-164-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with Lowry & Associates re design of the Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, providing for payment for soils investigation and surveying services in the lump sum amounts of $1,900.00 and $1,930.00, respectively, increasing the total contract from $25,000.00 to $28,830.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:37 p.m., October 12, 1983. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of General Counsel in initiating legal action to That action of the General Counsel in collect $5,237.80 from Phil's initiating legal action to collect Custom Plating, Industrial Waste $5,237.80 in outstanding invoices owed to Permit No. 1-255 the District by Phil's Custom Plating, formerly of Santa Ana, be, and is hereby, ratified. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of General Counsel in initiating legal action to That action of the General Counsel in collect $1,937.48 from Circuit initiating legal action to collect Express Company, Industrial Waste $1,937.48 in outstanding invoices owed to Permit No. 1-135 the District by Circuit Express Company, formerly of Santa Ana, be, and is hereby, ratified. -12- 10/12/83 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:38 p.m., October 12, 1983. R • Secretary, Boards of Drfectors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -13- 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/02/83 PAGE 1 it COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PiID 09/07/83 i WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I ' is 065474 - - .. - --...._-ACME._MEOICAI,. $UPPLIE$_—__•------.__--- -.-----$2_71�32__ __F_LRST A.ID..SUP_P-LIES_.-..__...- --.---- --.------- --...... 065475 AbVANCED UFFICE SERVICES $39.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065476 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS• INC. $1569930.93 CONTRACTOR P2-27 065477 AIR PRODUCTS 8_CHEMICALSt ,INC..._- __ . 065476 DEBRA E. ALLEN S20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ^65479 AMERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. S35.11 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065480 _ AMERICAN.-COMFRESSOR CO HE __--____ _ ._._ _.. _.._ . -_ ._..___-54.0•L$—_--_..._—QLPE--SUPPLIES.___--. —.. • 465481 ANAIM .SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1.400.00 CSDOC #7 REPAIRS 065482 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S2.463.03 PUMP PARTS 065483 APCO VALVE & PRIMER CORP.. ._. ... .-- • 065a8q apPl[ED FILTRATION $213.40 PIPE SUPPLIES C65485 AQUA BEN CORP. $19.129.82 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 065486 _. ARROWHEAD_ELEC.TR.]C CORP:._-------.----__ ----_31�6,92 ---ELECTRt•C-AL-..SUPPLIES---.-_.-------___ .___._.-_•-_ ....._ _ _ C65487 B&B TRUCKS S318.00 TRUCK PARTS ^6548R BACHARACH INST. CO. l88.51 PUBLICATIONS 065489 MARGARF.T-_BAILEY _--. -._ .__322:Q0.—_-____CITI.ZEN �III SV_tSORY__COMHITTEE_.._.__..__..____. ._ 96549C BAKER PLYWOOD C0.• INC. S570.48 SMALL HARDWARE 065491 ED PERAM $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065192 _ ._ __._.9EVC0--•-- 52.Af1 F1 FCIRI.C_CARL_kARTS.---- -------- -- = C65493 BIG BOX RENTAL CO. $69050.00 TRASH DISPOSAL G65494 SLAKE+ MOFFITT & TOWNE $905.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ^,65495 BOMAR--MAGNETO_-SERV ICE -t_-INC•__.-...._..___-_ . ._...------__.-...1890.5.4-_-_---ENGINE_QARLS.____-..- --___-- --_-._-- 065496 BORDEN METAL PRODUCTS. INC. $19387.00 SMALL HARDWARE ^65497 BRENNER-FIELDER & ASSOC.* INC. S53.02 FREIGHT 965498 _ STEVE. 9UDALO..CONSTHIICIJON.C4�..__.-_._. ___ . ___. __$29s5.77.22__._.__ CSD.00_.#5__EMERGENCY.-REPAIRS. _ _... 165499 BURKE CONCRETE ACCESSORIES $52.62 BUILDING MATERIALS C65500 . CPT CALIFORNIA• INC. $5,936.10 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES 065501 CAL-GLASS FOR-RESEARCH9 INC. _. .$127.87 ..__. -- -WELD__.._ ING_ S.SUPPLIE _ . 365502 CAL SOUTH EGUIPMENT CO. %446.20 TRUCK REPAIRS 06°503 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY $5.482.44 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 06r-504 JOHN CAROLL,O_ EAGINEIRS..-_ •._.___- _-_-... _.._._... __ __560.•-732..19___...____-ENGR._.J.-_i5.._P_.1.c20,_ P2-25-1A_. C65505 JOHN CAROLLO ENG / GREELEY HANSEN S1.715.24 CONSTRUCTION P2-23, TRAINING P2-23 A65506 CARUS CHEMICAL CO.9 INC. $326.97 FEEDER RENTAL 065507 CHRIS CERVELLONE S375•00 _ CSDOC_.UJ3-_F.ORMATION.STUDY CE550N CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES• INC. S27.487.57 FERRIC CHLORIDE 065509 MANUEL CID $20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE C65510 CLA-VAL._ COMPANY_ .... ._ _ 31.98.4.9T ------VALVES—___- 065511 CLARK DYE HARDWARE $27.44 SMALL HARDWARE 065512 DAVID J. CLINE 520.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE P65513 COAST FIRE EGUIPMENT 3155.9Q. .__ FIRE.EXT.INGUISHER -MAINTENANCE. ..-__. ._. 065-514 C04ST SWEEPING• INC. $380.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 065515 COIT DRAPERY SERVICE $538.90 DRAPERY CLEANING ,• 065516 EDNAPD F. COLBURN $23.00_ _ _ .CITIZENS-ADVISORY COMMITTEE 065517 CONROCK COMPANY $528.56 BUILDING, MATERIALS C6`518 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $706.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065519 CONSTRUCTION TOOL B THREADING $67.31 WELDING SUPPLIES ' i .r FUND NO g199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/02183 PAGE 2 _ REPORT._.NUMBER APA3 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 065520 CONTINENTAL, CHEMICAL -CO.- -_ ..-$2.39656.02 065521 CONTROL CABLES• INC. $123.45 CABLES 965522 CONTROLCO $385.I8 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 065523 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES ._ -- b1033.25___ _.___ENGI.Nf-_PARTS ^65524 MR. CRANE $29003.50 CRANE RENTAL 065525 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $21.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 065526 UNIVERSITY OF. CALIFO_R 1 -----�84.15_.-- -COHPUTE3__AfAVACES -.-._------.... ._ . ._.._..- . __ 065527 M.A. DAHL b20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 06552LI DAILY PILOT b19635.05 LEGAL ADVERTISING 065529 DANIELS_ TIRE SERVICE . , _5.4,76.32 .________._ 0655311 DECO $53.67 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065531 DELPHI SYSTEMS. INC. $29117.50 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES 065532 DORADO- FN,TfRPRISESt_1NG*__ _ _ _ _ _-__$1.r-18.0.10 .__�hI�NL��RHAIAS. .. ___.___ __ __.____ ... 065533 DONN EDWARDS CORP. $392.78 PAINT SUPPLIES ` 065534 E.D.A.WrINC. & K.P. LINDSTROM $29495.64 EIR ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL 065535 E-2 LAMINATING CO. _ $51.99 _.._____`-OFFICE_ SUPPLIES __--_--_---.__.---__-__,_____._-._. - 965536 EASTMAN♦ INC. S29082.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065537 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $44.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 Ob5536 E-NCHANTL .ERINC ----_----------.------------.--.--------.--83LS.D0.0.0 OCEAN MONITORING F _-_•----.--._ .---. _- _. N 065539 AR WEST TERMITE &PEST CONTROL $520.00 PEST CONTROL P6554? FIBRE GLASS-EVFRCOAT CO.r INC. $165.88 PAINT SUPPLIES 065541 FILTER SUPPLY CO. _ b937_..9_L ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065512 FISCIIER & PORTER CO. $439.60 PIPE SUPPLIES 06554� FLAT & VERTICAL CONCRETE $400.00 BUILDING MATERIALS 065544 CITY OF .FOUNTAIN VALLEY ._ _ .__ _ b659.86 WATER USEAGE ^65545 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2r383.31 BUILDING MATERIALS C65546 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S612.48 TELEPHONE 065547 GIERLICH-MITCHELL9 INC. 452r234.51 FILTER PRESS BELTS,__SPEC. P-056 065548 DAVID A. GOFF i20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 06554q LARRY HALLOS S121.90 TRUCK REPAIRS 06555C HAR90R TOWING $133.00. TOWING 065551 CHARLES G. HARDY• INC. $216.40 BUILDING MATERIALS 065552 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 1276.45 PIPE SUPPLIES 065552 MICHAEL HEINZ $81.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 965554 HOLCHEMr INC. $29300.00 CAUSTIC SODA 065555 HOLMES MINI TRUCK DISMANTLERS 11*918.60 TRUCK PARTS 965556 HOUSE OF BATTERIFS i135.11_ BATTERIES 065557 IIUNDLEY COMPANY• INC. S19263.65 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065558 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S4.581.12 WATER USEAGE 065559 HUNTINGTON PEACH RUPOER STAMP $36.97 OFF-ICE 5UPPLIES_ 06556C ICC INSTRUMENT $25.81 LAB REPAIRS 069561 INGRAM PAPER b19936.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 065562 INSTRUMENT SOCIETY OF AMERICA $99.30. PUBLICATION _. 965563 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE b228.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 065564 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $3.50 WATER USEAGE 065569 JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 589.8E THERMOSTAT I y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/02/83 PAGE 3 a -REPORT NIIMRER ARA-4 --,----- ._---- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �.. CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 WARRANT NO.J - VENDOR _ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 190-00 CST-.IZENS-ADV-I-SORY--C-OMMI-TTEC --- ------. -..---.__.-____ 065567 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $333.01 BEARING SUPPLIES 065568 KENNEDY PIPELINE CO. S49001.74 CSDOC #5 EMERGENCY REPAIRS • __.065569.__--_-- K I HG0EAU.N6 RI INC:- _ 593 .2Z- REANG-SUP-PILLES --`-------- - 065570 KIRST PUMP 8 MACH NE WORKS $19511.90 PUMP PARTS 065571 KLEEN-LINE CORP S492.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES p 5572 _ KOHL! NALL.HARK CENTER S7;-As- F_EICE SIICQLIES 065573 L.B.W.S., INC. S330.13 WELDING SUPPLIES �. �. 065574 LAURSEN COLOR LAB $105.74 FILM PROCESSING • 065575 -- -_ K.P._LINOS.LROH__8_A5SSOCIALE_� �2�bpp�g9 pEEAN WAIVER RESpnHSl- 065576 LOS ANGELES CHEMICAL CO. $19664.20 HERBICIDES 065577 LOS ANGELES TIMES $19590.80 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING • _-.-06557.$ _----HAgQ_LP_�ALQly�l( - -- sgR..OD CI-LLZE Us-AD VJS0RY__C-OMILt_T.TE_E__.-- --------.., _. 065579 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $I*300.00 CSDOC #3 REPAIRS 065580 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S22.94 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _ 065581. GEORGE MASON __--- --_._- ;�2�Q ji1TIZENS A01[-LS.ORY COMMITTEF 065882 MATT - CHLOR• INC. $469.16 PIPE SUPPLIES :1> 065563 PATRICK MCNELLY S20.00 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 06ti584 GE4RGE HILLU-011STRUCTION- $117,71A-7p CONTRACTOR 1-711-1 -------- 06558 5 MITCHELL MANUALS, INC. $47.40 PUBLICATION �.. ..I 065586 H. MITLO $1$ 50.00 TRUCK PARTS 065587._-.^ MONITEK+ LNC_ ____ _ -;1B1-...36 FLECTHICAL-SiIPPU.ES 065588 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. S321.91 VALVES SUPPLIES 065589 JERRY L. MORRIS• M.D. $75.00 MEDICAL EXAMINATION __------06559 -__-5-82-76 SMALL_.HARDWARE 065591 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S15.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 I 065592 OCEAN SALT CO., INC. $599.75 SALT 065593 ORANGE VA_L_VE 8_FIj11NG_C0. -_-_.- __•-.__-. __-�.113.97_ 1LA�YE _S.UPP.LLES-._.__ 065594 COUNTY OF ORANGE $19598.39 TESTING P2-25-IA, PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS I �FI 065595 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $39666.52 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND --- - 065596.- --- ---PPG INDDS.IRIE'St-1 �------ - - ----._-_�180.25 PALILLSUI'QLLES ----- - -- ---- - I 065597 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. S268.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065598 PACIFIC TELEPHONE S121.53 TELEMETERING 065599._ _ . PALMER_BLDG...SY$TEN_COjtP,- �" 065600 PAMECO-AIRS $88.14 PIPE SUPPLIES "i 065601 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $382.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _... ._06.5602.._....---- PD1'YSErpL _----- -----.r- S133-4f, iRLGK-QARIS 065603 POSTMASTER $19000.00 POSTAGE 065604 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $60.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE 065605 QUALIFIED ELECTRIC_SUPPLY -_- -_-_-1 99�6 -^-PEE0RlCAL SI&2.LIES 065669 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS S112.78 TRUCK PARTS 065607 THE REGISTER S948.64 LEGAL ADVERTISING • -..___.-.065608 ROBERTSHAW CONTROL�_C0. ELECTRICAL SUPPIL-1E5..- _ 065609 RUSSCO CONSTRUCTION. INC. $53i921.25 CONTRACTOR 5-18R 065610 RYAN-NERCO $19.66 FREIGHT ., P65611 SAM• INC. _....__... _.. - - -;9t2.792(z --- WIRE SUPPLY - - - - -- ._. ..._............ cl PROCESSING DATE 09/02/83 PAGE 5 FUND NO 9199 DIST WORKING CAPITAL REPORT NO AP43 ti ----COUNTY-SANITATION-VISTRI-CT57-0-F-"ANGE-rWNTY-'---- - CLAIMS PAID 09/07/83 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $ 1 ,468. 17 #3 OPER FUND 7,903-72 5-0 P E"U N D- --37,-6 3 #5 ACO FUND 53,921 .25 #6 OPER FUND 1 ,639.74 17-OPER-FUND- -11-,juD--v #11 OPER FUND 1 .864.00 #13 ACO FUND 769.25 ----#566--OPER- FUND-' 227-50 #6&7 OPER FUND 3,006.88 JT OPER FUND 382,403.01 VRF tlo SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 67-96 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 3,666.52 ------JT-WORK I NG-C-AP I TILL FUNO- 4-7-,OTT.-3r---- TQTAI CLAJ-HS- P In 09-40.U83 $904,656 14 y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/08/83 PAGE 1 NUMBER A P9 3 ---- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08/83 i WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 065b50---- RAYS-[FItT $259818,95 DEFERTiEVORPERSATTOR-PAYMENT ---'— -' t ----------------- —_.._.. `-- ----- — ----TOTAC LEA I7RS—FAT[f097OB783 H-9 SIB:3 l -- -- MOU --JT-.-WORKING-CAPITAtFUN , --- ( . 0TAL.CLAIRS-PAID_0/O$L83 r 10 :� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAFI7AL PROCESSING DATE 9/19/83 PAGE I � __----- -._ .- -._----R�PORS-NL158JrR--AP-4-�----- --.___ -.----------•-- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/21/83 WARRANT NO.' VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I' _ -Q656Eg A-1 kup-srRiFs- -.- _-_S24-.94 LANDSCARING-SUPP-LIES-- -- --------•--- 065665 ABC LUMBER CORP. $69232.80 LUMBER 06E670 A.S.U. S259.25 LAB SUPPLIES Ob5b21-_--- ADIANCE CC. EIRUCIORSs lbJC.-- --.---- -.---..1106•-7-1-0.94-----CONTRACTOR- R-2=21 -------__ __ -. 065672 WAYNE W. AEGERTER $10.40 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE !65673 AIR PRCCUCTS & CHEMICALS• INC. $79268.95 OXYGEN PLANT EQUIPMENT b5E24 QLL-L.ARS_-ALLC_PLARTS 41-7-9- 44 TRUC-K---BARBS- -- --- ---- (65675 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $206.70 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 065676 AMERICAN FNEUMAIIC TOOL CO $108.99 TOOL REPAIRS ___26U37 KING_ IL79.50 RU14"ARTS-- ----------- ;:I 065679 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES $125.00 TOWEL RENTAL II 065679 AQUA BEN CCRF. $289595.24 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS ACSjC_ClgIEF CCNC&E7F PRQn_ •_I.NC $190-80 8U4-L-D4-NG-MAT€RIA65-- - -- 0656P1 BACKFLOU PREVENTION DEVICE S171.50 DEVICE TESTING 065682 KATHY BARBCUR $28.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE �SSSl01LILS 4-1NC.-_ --_ _15510..Ob----.WORKER-S!COHP_-ADNIN-I-STRAI-0R--- ------- e6E6P4 BOP.#S AIR CONDITIONING $70.00 TRUCK REPAIRS �•• 065685 YICHAEL BRANDMAN & ASSOC.9INC S29531.49 MASTER PLAN EIR-CSDOC #2,3,11 n �6 �6 PRISTOL PARK MEDL(,pl GRP.. INC 1-6-5.-00 P-RE-=EHPLAYHENT-EXAMS - 1.( F--' 065687 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS91NC $268@00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL , II : 065608 BURKE CCNCRETE ACCESSORIES $62.33 BUILDING MATERIALS 66°_---P<<S1AE.S 9 PROFE_SSICNA�_ - ---------�iJ0.00 SEH.LNAR-REG-I STRATI ON _ - C'65690 CALIF. ASSCC. OF SAK. AGENCIES $440.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 1 �'.. P65691 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SIA2.09 PIPE SUPPLIES ' `•-.---__.C656�2 CARMF_NI.J9_F_aRC_1RurK ceLES�- IAi ---.--- S60-.-82 TQUC_"ARIS -- --- ----•-- --- 065693 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $80*372.90 ENGR. P1-20, J-15 0656`4 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $19541.97 ENGR. P2-27, ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL 0656.25--_-..------C.HRJ .__CEB_V ELL ONf-------.- _ -.---_SB25.II0_. CSDO.C._#1.3.-FORMAT.ION__S-TUDY__.--...._-----_.--.---. _....__-.-- •• (65696 CHF..MWEST INDUSTRIESt INC. $796411.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE -1 06F697 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. $89947.66 GASOLINE L9B.ST IftS_URANLE_AL .N.C.Y-.-.--- ---- __Eb33.00 INSURANCE_ PREMIUM --------- --------- 065699 COMPRESSOR & INDUSTRIAL $500.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 065700 CONROCK CCKPANY $249.74 BUILDING MATERIALS C".!jCL.I.CAI - ----S360.8fl_-.___.-_ELECTRICAL_..SUPPLIES---_.-- ----__-_________------___---- ._-_-- •' 0657C2 CONSCLICATEC REPRODUCTIONS S3.697.11 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION ('65793 CCNTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO Sl91280.34 CHLORINE ' 06-5105 ECTRI C -- -E222.17 -- ELEC-TR-I-CAL--SUPPL I.ES --- 065705 COURTON & ASSOCIATES $59250.00 MASTER PLAN EIR-CSDOC g1 ,6,7 "I e65706 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER $163.30 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE _Q65707 -LARRY CURTI TRUCK & EOUI_PMEN_L _43-2.6-U-9-7.2_-_____..-1RASH_D_ISP.0SAL__...._____.-..._--.---.___-._. " 065708. STATE CF CALIFORNIA $20.00 ANNEXATION N93 PROCESSING FEE '. •I C6F709 DECKER INSIRUMENT SUPPLY CC. $549.31 PRESSURE GAUGES ---------.. 519..H9�_ ELEC-TR.LCAL-SUR.BLIES-----------..-- -- - 06E711 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $19127.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES �. 065712 DORACO ENTERPRISES, INC. $39744.47 CONCRETE REMOVAL f065713-_- --DUNN E-CGAPCS_ CORP. - ------... _ ......_ ._53q925..1_B._ -SUPpLJES.. I„ i ,. 01 FUND no 9199 DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/19/83 PAGE 2 i_.I _R F_P_OR_T__NU HB_E FL-A P.4 3------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/21/83 • WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION __FIMCL_ERfLCE.SS. EGLLP-. rn. 06E.715 EAGLE SUPPLY OF CALIF. $916.44 PIPE SUPPLIES 065716 EASTMAN, INC. $717.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES Q657-11- 965719 FISCHER 9 FORTER CO. $19041.37 PIPE SUPPLIES 065719 FCOTFILL CAROEN EGUIPMENI S45.80 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES __f E512-0-- fCUNTAIA VAIIFY rAFFRA 0 _"LM-RROtE.SS-I 065721 THE FOXBORO COMPANY $509.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 165722 FRANCE COPFRESSOR PRODUCT $277.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS FRUIT LAEL-ANALY.S-1 S C65724 CITY OF FULLERTON 5201.70 WATER USEAGE 065725 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC. $79732.93 TELEPHONE GE RAG EJL_RE_P_A-I_RS--- 065727 GLENDON CCFPANY $361.07 PIPE SUPPLIES 065728 GEORGE I. HALL CO. $31.10 VALVE SUPPLIES ___Q6`12 9 H LEH) . ----1229.!11---StiALL-HARDWABE-- 005730 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S277.53 PIPE SUPPLIES 0657=1 HERTZ CAR LEASING $32 7.5q VEHICLE LEASING .65132 11006SON El ECTRIC lk7A6-SO ELECTRICAL &EPAIRS Q6 f;733 HUN71NGTON SUPPLY $25.18 SMALL HARDWARE zz 065734 PYDRCTEX $344.29 LAB SUPPLIES H 01-4 F A F ER 7­9 1 A N I-T all I A L__S U P P L I E S-- e65726 INTOL. TFREADED PRCDUCTS9 INC. $579.21 WELDING SUPPLIES 065737 INTEROX AMERICA $19434.00 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE D ku-18- K A ftA N_JJEP HJJJB S_&-SUP _&I_k.� EARING-SUPPL-IES----- 065739 KEEN-NUT AERASIVE CC. $192.16 TOOLS 065740 KING BEARING, INC. $19426.85 BEARING SUPPLIES 065742 PLIFN-LINE CORP $31.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 065743 PNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $96*46 SMALL HARDWARE ___.1165_214 - _1186.41. WELD-I-NG--SUPP1-I ES-----065745 LAURSEN CCLCR LAB $695.14 FILM PROCESSING 065 746 LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORS9 INC. $559.30 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -PARTS- 065748 LONG BEACh SAFETY COUNCIL S75.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 06F749 LCNG PEACF SANCBLASTING Co. $19608.75 SANDBLASTING fi-a 7�n I CURV k Ac5rr1AIfq _1329*2911"O ENG-R. 065751 FARVAC ELECTRONICS S120.80 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 069752 FASTER ELLEFRINT & SUPPLY S16.98 BLUEPRINTING 065793 MATT -_CHLCRj INC. $1_43a..53 P4-P"UPLPLII-E.% 065754 PAUL A. FITCHELL $21.80 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 065755 P. PITLO $795.00 TRUCK PARTS • Pfif 750; __1298-48 ---E6E-VATOR-MA-1-NTENANGE------- 065757 NATIONAL CHEMSEARCH $182.32 LAB SUPPLIES 065758 NATICNAL LUMBER SUPPLY $564.29 SMALL HARDWARE 065759 C a q FUND NO 9159 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/19/83 PAGE 3 ------------------------ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/21/83 WARRANT NC. VENDOR - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -_0657f-n CnIIN-LY-C.F GRANGE- _-�T_ -.. Sb2�05 TESTI-NG-P2-25=IA------------•- --------- 065761 COUNTY SAKITATICN DISTRICT S1085.30 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND 0657E2 FAPECO-AIRE $192.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0fi5.Z63- PAR S 11NI I.MIIED_ _.A -_ S902.64 TRUCK-P-ARTS------------------- ----- -- - 065764 PEAT• FAR4ICK9 MITCHELL 8 CO. $13*211.00 ANNUAL AUDIT 065765 POLY FABRICS $95.70 PIPE SUPPLIES 6F EdEL1P�R 111RRSlr-ICF t60-S40 LNDUSZR1AL--WASTE--SANPLI-NG-ICE------ --- - -- 065767 R. J. W. CCNSTRUCTICN CO.9 INC $219260.62 RETENTION PW-085 065768 RAINBO6 DISPOSAL CO. 1334.00 TRASH DISPOSAL THE REGISTER -- --------158L.51 LE&AL_ADV.ERTI.S-LNG- ------ --- --- ---- 065770 REPUBLIC ENGINES $309.66 TRUCK REPAIRS 065771 RGBBINS 9 FEYERS $1.536.58 PUMP PARTS -A65ZZ2 Sr"01 I R-r C_ -ADV-ERT I S J FJr i328y-a0----1 L-T-LMA7-E---SDL-I-DS-O.I SPDSAL- PUB L 1 C PART I C I PA.J_O.H--__ 065773 $HALLER 8 LOHR9 INC. $49782.00 ENGR. 5-18R 1 065774 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S19063.20 TOOLS '-- 065775 &OUT.HEM rAI_IE-_EDLSIlflLCn• 1884-652-.95-- PaW.ER _ _ _�-- 065776 SO CALIF ENERGY COALITION ANC ESCO, INC. S29048.00 ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT, PLANT. #2 065777 SO. CAL. CAS CC. $219318.87 NATURAL GAS I -p6E77R SOUTHERN CUNT_IES 011 rn_ Rta966.0-20 Ill FSFI FI Fi - 065779 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER S946.50 BOTTLED WATER ;± 065780 STAROW STEEL S168.12 STEEL STOCK -065781 -SUPER_CI-_EE__C0RP S636.00- -CHEMILALS -- ----- 065782 THE SUPPLIERS S456.36 SMALL HARDWARE 065763 SYBRCN - CASTLE $194.00 LAB MAINTENANCE ? fit IP4 _-,Is-WAINF SYL-VESTER --PET•T-Y-GASH--REIMBURSEMENT- ----- -------- 065785 THCNPSCK LACQUER CO. $109.87 PAINT SUPPLIES 065786 TRUCK 8 ALTO SUPPLY• INC. $389.27 TRUCK PARTS ,. ---_._Q6`a.Z$Z _LUP.ESALES----------------- - ------------.-539.9•-02-- -P-.JP.E--SUPPLIES---.__ ------- --- --- .. 065786 UNILOC $461.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 065789 UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. S105.46 GASOLINE 6579E ILULIEI1-EAELE" -&EEILLCE --DEL-I-VERY--SERV-ICE-r-- - -- 065791 UNIVERSITY OF TOLECC 1430.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 065792 UNIVERSITY SALES 8 SERVICE $182.88 TRUCK PARTS Q6.U_93- VYP SUEN_-1EI-C ---------------------.-.----_-- 065794 VALLEY C171ES SUPPLY CO. $322.58 PIPE SUPPLIES T65795 VALVE 9 STEEL SUPPLY CO. $513.57 VALVES 06r-756 .ICHN R. LdAFLFS _- 137.6..4a .ODOR-CONSULTANT— -- ----------.-- 065797 WARREN 8 BAILEY $140.59 PIPE SUPPLIES 065798 THOMAS L. 600DRUFF $129369.50 LEGAL SERVICES 065799 XERGX_.CORF.- -__--- ----------------- 1Q7AL-LLAlMS_PAID__82121E.E3-------------25b0�.3J5.9.0 _-- _.- _ FUND- NO 9199 -DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE_ 9/15/83_ PAGE 4 REPORT NO -AP43 - • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _.-- -- ----- ---.-.-. - --- - CLAIMS PAID_ 09/21/83 ---------- --- -- -- ---SUMMARY -- -----AMOUNT ----- - --------- I• j. #1 OPER FUND _ $ -_ 27_80 �� ----Tf"-Tc0�u�i b --- - ------------------ 1 .7 3 2.5 0 — -------_ ------ --- ------ N2 OPER FUND 3,573.97 #2 ACO FUND 7 L 46 1• -#�R FUND -- 21:920 00 - - -- I• #3 OPER FUND 9,149.73 #3 ACO FUND 1 ,174.82 •` #3--F7R-FUND - ---- 11 ,050.00 ----- - ---------- �•I - N5 OPER FUND 4,415.80 #5 ACO FUND 4,782.00 16-O P E R-TU N 6 -- _ --- - 13.20 — --- (. =.I #6 ACO FUND 1 ,743.05 97 OPER FUND 2554.35 �• - --f7--ACO-FUND----- 785.00-- �._ c- #11 OPER FUND 8.609.70 1 #11 ACO FUND 253. 15 T3--AC0 FD 1 ,624.79 N5E6 OPER FUND 933.99 ._� - --- JT OPER FUND 216,715.34 TORF` - - - --- �-4 ------ --------- --- -------- SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 1 ,033.50 SELF FUNDED WORKERS.' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2,135.30 FUND- -JT`GORKTA�-CAPTTAl -- ---- - -------- ------- ----- - 35,0 7.-53 .,�..- -------TOTAL- I.. I, EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY lltw ` SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., October 12, 1983, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Boards' action of May 11, 1983, authorizing General Manager That the Boards of Directors hereby amend to negotiate and issue a purchase the Boards' action of May 11, 1983, order re Job No. P1-19-4 authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for purchase of Pipe and Fittings for Replacement of a Plant Water Line at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-4, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00. This action is revised to include issuance of purchase orders for the pipe and fittings and for the installation of said pipe, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of October, 1983. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of October, 1983. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts ,,,� Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 I ��ITATIOv J .1 p m l RESULTS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM 1 JULY 1976 - JULY 1983 l 1 l I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 10844 ELLIS AVENUE j FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 !f (714) 540-2910 ISEPT. 1 . 1983 BASIC ELEMENTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS I SUCCESSFUL INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM I • ORDINANCE PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM INDUSTRY , MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONS A14D CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE I • -1-11REE-PHASE IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH PHASE 1 (JULY 1, 1976) - REQUIRED "GOOD 110USEKEEPINGIt PRACTICES BY INDUSTRY I ALLOWED TIME FOR SOURCE CONTROL PLANS TO BE DEVELOPED I PHASE If (JULY L 1978) - REOUIRED INSTALLATION OF PRETREATMENT FACILITIES WITII L114ITS TO MEET CALIFORNIA OCEAN PLAN REQUIREMENTS IPHASE III (JULY 1, 1983) - REQUIRES ADDITIONAL PRETREATMENT FACILITIES BY INDUSTRY TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS l • PERMIT LIMITS BASED ON MASS EMISSIONS ENCOURAGES INDUSTRY TO CONSERVE WATER , SINCE ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCE INDUSTRY HAS GROWN BY 36 PERCENT BUT WATER CONSUMPTION HAS BEEN REDUCED BY 5 MILLION GALLONS PER DAY • ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM BY DISTRICTS' INDUSTRIAL WASTE DEPARTMENT FREQUENT SAMPLING OF INDUSTRY BY DISTRICTS ` PERSONNEL 1 SAMPLE AND EVALUATION PROGRAM ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AGREEMENTS CEASE AND DESIST PERMIT REVOCATION I 1 1 DISCHARGE LIMITS, mg/1 CONSTITUENT July 1, 1976 July 1, 1978 July 1, 1983 Arsenic 2. 0 2.0 2.0 Cadmium 5.0 3.0 1. 0 Chromium (total) 6.0 2.0 2. 0 Copper 10. 0 4.0 3. 0 Lead 2. 0 2.0 2.0 Mercury 0. 03 0.03 0.03 Nickel 10. 0 10.0 10.0 Silver 5. 0 5.0 5.0 Zinc 15. 0 10.0 10.0 a Cyanide (total) 10. 0 5.0 5.0 !1 Cyanide (free)1 1. 0 1.0 1.0 PCB' s and Pesticides 0. 02 Total Toxic Organics (as defined by EPA) 0. 58 ! Total Sulfide 5. 0 i Dissolved Sulfide 0. 5 Oil or grease of mineral, petroleum origin 100.0 The term free cyanide" shall mean those cyanides amenable to chlorination as described in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1972, Standard D 2036-72 Method B, page 553. 1 FEES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND MASS EMISSION RATES j Dollars Per Pound Per Day in Excess of Limit During and After Routine After ECSA Batch Sampling S & E Expiration Dumps Arsenic $ 100.00 $ 200.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Cadmium 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Chromium (Total) 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Copper 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 i Lead 80.00 160. 00 240.00 240.00 Mercury 100.00 200. 00 300.00 300. 00 Nickel 50.00 100. 00 150.00 150. 00 Silver 100.00 200. 00 300.00 300.00 b Zinc 50.00 100.00 150. 00 150.00 b Cyanide (Total) 50.00 100. 00 150. 00 150. 00 Cyanide (Free, amenable to chlorination) 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 PCB's, Pesticides and Total Toxic Organics 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 1 Phenols 50. 00 100.00 150.00 150. 00 Dissolved Sulfides 50. 00 100.00 150.00 150. 00 I i i 930 1978 OCEAN PLAN 1 90 80 70 60 50 i 40 CSDOC PROPOSED WAIVER LIMITATION 30 20 75-76 76 -77 77-78 78-79 79-80 80-81 81- 82 82-83 I DATE CADMIUM EFFLUENT I 1 930 1978 OCEAN FLAN - I j 31U 280 250 6SDOD PROPOSED a 220 WAIVER LIMITATION o 19® 160 t 3© 100 75 ' 76 76-77 77 -78 78-79 79- 80 80- 81 81-82 82-83 DATE CHROMIUM EFFLUENT 1 I 940 1978 OCEAN PLAN 1 I 600 500 2 400 CSDOC PROPOSED WAIVER LIMITATION 300 200 I 75- 76 76-77 77 -78 78-79 79 -80 80 -81 81 -82 82-83 DATE COPPER EFFLUENT I 940 1978 OCEAN PLAN 1 255 235 1 0 215 CSDOC PROPOSED _'0 WAIVER LIMITATION N 195 175 155 I 1 35 1 15 1 75-76 76 -77 77 -78 78-79 79-80 80-81 81- 82 82-83 DATE LEAD EFFLUENT I I I 6 215 1978 OCEAN PLAN • 1 I 24 0 220 CSDOC PROPOSED WAIVER LIMITATION 200 -v 180 I cn 160 I 140 120 I 100 I 75- 76 76- 77 77-78 78-79 79-80 80 -81 81-82 82-83 D AT E I NICKEL EFFLUENT I I 1 1 I 80 1978 OCEAN PLAN 1 CSDOG PROPOSED 40 WAIVER LIMITATION 35 30 0 25 -v , N 20 15 I 10 5 0 I 75- 76 76-77 77- 78 78-79 79- 80 80-81 81 -82 82-83 DATE SILVER EFFLUENT 1 1 3750 1978 OCEAN PLAN 1 1000 900 I 800 v 700 GSDOG PROPOSED WAIVER LIMITATION NNI 800 N 500 40 0 i 300 i 200 75-76 76 - 77 77- 78 78-79 79- 80 80- 81 81-82 82-83 DATE ZINC EFFLUENT �...r �s ►.� Mum" trim ammmm k� eUMM.0 saEW rid MEMO kmmmlo mmmr OWMd ':ZLS"_RJ4 A L WASM Orrr�IGN _FCRC='IT 7--A."1 DIAGP_;M _ezcit Lla tations . urine VCn-Cw"T IL�-Ce pm$ '..=I:!22.ce NOn-;.cmml once ��t�'11Ce Fens :-:,,m2uaticn Ceamliar:ce Mon-- ance Fees 21_ 3ecawrend2tion :action 0 c ease Fees c` mince ^esist 3evo�tion 0e IUD c Nuisance _z*r...azicn of response SenIce ease By Desist =ndustry a �r� Request for Reconsideration BY renerr� Y-Anger Refer Back To reefer to Staff Board of ?or 'bd1 01cation Jseccors Board of Di ectars ?anal Decision r OCTOBER 198 �- PROPOSED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA FINAL FACILITIES PLAN / PROGRAM AND SUMMARY OF FINAL EIS/ EIR EPA United States Region IX LA/OMA PROJECT Environmental Protection Fremont St. San Agency San Francisco,Ca.94105 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Project has been financed in part with Federal funds from the Environmental Protection Agency under grant number C-06-1042-011. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Analysis of ocean disposal systems, other than -for the NEPA-CEQA No Project Alternative was not studied using EPA and SWRC6 funds. Funding for study of deep ocean outfalls and barge disposal was provided by the City of Los Angeles , Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts , and Orange County Sanitation Districts. ABSTRACT s FINAL FACILITIES PLAN/PROGRAM AND SUMMARY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTIENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE LOS ANGELESIORANGE COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA OF CALIFORNIA A proposed program has been selected to serve the sludge management needs of the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts,and Orange County Sanitation Districts.The proposed program provides for complete cessation of ocean discharge of sludge and recovery of useable resources from the sludge. For the City of Los Angeles, a system of dehydration and thermal processing for volume reduction and energy recovery has been selected. For the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts,a combination of dehydration and thermal process- Ing for volume reduction and energy recovery,advanced windrow composting and recycling,and landfill disposal of dewatered sludge has been selected.Truck transport of dewatered sludge to an offsite location for compostinglair drying has been selected for the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Due to public comment,additional alternative sites for the Orange County Sanitation Districts facilities will be examined in a Supplemental Draft and Final EISIEIR.Certain demonstration studies are al3o identified for each agency.Thermal processing systems will be fitted with advanced air pollution control systems and will comply with the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. PARTICIPATING AGENCY LOCATIONS City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering 213.485-3071 City Hall, Room 800 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Los Angeles County Technical Services Department 213.699.7411 e Sanitation Districts 1955 Workman Mill Road Whittier, California 90607 Orange County Chief Engineer 714.962.2411 Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 State Water Resources Division of Water Quality 916.445.7971 Control Board 2014"T"Street Sacramento,California 95801 Environmental Region IX 415.556.8037 Protection Agency 215 Fremont Street San Francisco,California 94104 FOREWORD This Final Facilities Plan and Summary of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the municipal wastewater sludge management program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metro- politan-Area of California. Both the Draft and Final EIS/EIR have been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and California Environ- mental Quality Act and regulations issued pursuant thereto. The Draft and Final EIS/EIR and Facilities Plan have been prepared jointly by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sani- tation Districts, Orange County Sanitation Districts, and California State Water Resources Control Board, acting through the Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (LA/OMA Project) . The Final EIS/EIR consists of two parts: VOLUME I: "Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/ Orange County Metropolitan Area", April 1980, and appendices thereto. VOLUME II: "Final Environmental. Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/ Orange County Metropolitan Area", October 1980, and appendices thereto. The Final Facilities Plan consists of two parts: VOLUME I : "Draft Facilities Plan/Program, Proposed Sludge Management Pro- gram for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area" , April 1980. VOLUME II : Final Facilities Plan/Program and Summary of Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report, Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area", October 1980. s LA/OMA PROJECT POLICY BOARD Mr. Neil Dunham Deputy Executive Director State Water Resources Control Board Mr. Richard A. Coddington Chief, California Branch, Water Division Region IX, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mr. Donald C. Tillman City Engineer City of Los Angeles Mr. Walter E. Garrison Chief Engineer and General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County i i LA/OMA PROJECT STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE Ms. Ann Godfrey Project Officer Region IX, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mr. Mel Holland Assistant Chief, Division of Water Quality State Water Resources Control Board Mr. Robert S. Horii Deputy City Engineer City of Los Angeles Mr. Robert P. Miele Head, Technical Services Department County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ti { LA/OMA PROJECT STAFF Bill Davis Project Manager Roger T. Haug, Ph.D. Senior Engineer Christine A. Harris Public Affairs Officer M. Phillip Lo, D.Env. Project Engineer Cindy Geter Assistant Public Affairs Officer Greg Jowyk Graphic Artist Alma Rios Secretary to the Project Manager Jan Tanori Secretary Lynda Hershey Secretary OCTOBER 1980 • Asti - Participating Agencies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Region IX) California State Water Resources Control Board City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Orange County Sanitation Districts E 1 r l l GOALS { ENVIRONMENTALLY, SOCIALLY, AND ECONOMICALLY COST EFFECTIVE RECOVERY OF RESOURCES FROM WASTEWATER SLUDGES i RELIABLE MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER SLUDGE TO MINIMIZE PUBLIC HEALTH RISKS AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION i i { { r t i! 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOSURE. tO SELECTED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. . . . . . . . . 11 CITY OF LOS ANGELES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Project Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Economics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Project Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Economics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 -� Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Project Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Economics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 A Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 RESEARCH AND CONTINUING PLANNING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 AVAILABILITY OF LA/OMA PROJECT PUBLICATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 LIBRARIES RECEIVING LA/OMA PROJECT PUBLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 FINAL FACILITIES PLAN/PROGRAM AND SUMMARY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/REPORT Sludge management in the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (LA/OMA) is the responsibility of the City of Los Angeles (CLA), County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD), and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (OCSD). Together, these three operating agencies treat approximately one bil- lion gallons per day of wastewater produced by the some 8,000,000 persons living in the metropolitan area. The LA/OMA area accounts for about one-half the : sludge produced in the state of California. Like other large urban communities, the Area has confronted problems associated with management of residuals produced from treatment of wastewater. The pro- posed management plan is the culmination of efforts which began in late 1974 with the execution of Joint Powers Agreement among the LA/OMA operating agen- cies. Region IX of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) , together with the three operating agencies, have provided continuing policy guidance for the Project through a five member Policy Board. A "Joint Goals Statement" approved by the Policy Board in 1975 established the goal of developing a long-term plan, in- cluding an implementation strategy, to use or dispose of residual solids re- sulting from industrial and municipal wastewater treatment in the Los Angeles/ Orange County Metropolitan Area in an environmentally, economically and socially acceptable manner. Work began in 1975 with preparation of a work plan and has resulted in the development of a proposed management program/facilities plan and a final environmental impact statement/report for the proposed facilities. For the City of Los Angeles, a system of dehydration and thermal processing for volume reduction and energy recovery has been selected. For the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, a combination of dehydration and thermal processing for volume reduction and energy recovery, advanced windrow composting and re- cycling, and landfill disposal of dewatered sludge has been selected. Truck transport of dewatered sludge to an offsite location for composting/air drying has been selected for the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Due to public comment, additional alternative sites for the OCSD facilities will be examined in a Supplemental Draft and Final EIS/EIR. Certain demonstration studies are also identified for each agency. Thermal processing systems will be fitted with advanced air pollution control systems and will comply with the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The selected facilities will provide for management of both primary and secondary sludges and will result in significant resource recovery through production of electricity and steam from a renewable organic source and through production of compost products. 1 i EPA, the State of California, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and Orange County Sanitation Districts concur in the selected sludge management program and find such program to be environmentally sound. The selected program provides for compliance with Federal and State laws and regula- tions and provides for recovery of usable resources energy and soil amendment products from sludges produced by the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area. Except as described below, all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm arising from the selected sludge management program have been adopted and are included in the selected program: City of Los Angeles: Changes in visual character, and public sector expen- ditures. 1 Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts: Changes in visual character, and public sector expenditures. Orange County Sanitation Districts: Public sector expenditures, and others 1 as may be identified by Supplemental EIS/EIR. 1 Project reports will be prepared by each of the operating agencies as an initial step in implementation of the selected program and will detail specific measures to minimize construction related impacts. i EPA and the State of California find that ocean disposal of sludge, containing significant concentrations of toxicantsl/ in a manner which results in sub- stantial accumulation of solids on the ocean bottom, has significant avoidable i environmental consequences. Current and projected sludge characteristics for LA/OMA operating agencies and current outfall systems have resulted in persis- tent significant public health concerns associated with consumption of seafood y containing elevated concentrations of trace organic chemicals. The selected sludge management program benefits the marine and human environment { by elimination of sludge discharges to the ocean which are the major contribu- tors of trace organics to the Southern California Bight. Additionally, benefits associated with conservation of resources are also realized. The selected pro- gram also provides for minimal nuisance potential . The selected sludge management program provides for sound management of the sludges that will be produced by secondary treatment of wastewaters and provides flexibility to accommodate decisions regarding applications for waiver of secon- dary treatment requirements that have been filed by each of the operating agen- cies. The selected sludge management program is not growth inducing since facili- ties will be sized to correspond to prior wastewater treatment capacity decisions. 1 Wastewater treatment plant capacity decisions are not a part of the selected sludge management program. Industrial pretreatment programs can effectively reduce certain undesirable heavy metals to levels which enhance the resource potential of the sludge. Pro- grams to provide maximum practicable reductions will be undertaken by the City of Los Angeles , Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and Orange County Sani- tation Districts. s I/ Toxicants are considered to be present in significant concentrations when ' they cause undesirable effects, including the possibility of danger associated with bioaccumulation in marine organisms. 2 i 1 In view of the comments received regarding location of composting/air drying facilities to serve Orange County Sanitation Districts, it is advisable to con- sider alternative locations that have been identified as a result of public com- ment. A Supplemental EIS/EIR will be prepared to provide the basis for selec- tion of the site for location of selected processing facilities to serve Orange County Sanitation Districts. EPA proposes to offer grant assistance for design and construction of the selec- ted sludge management program in the amount of 75 percent of the eligible costs as determined by the California State Water Resources Control Board. EPA in- tends to fund construction based in part upon the facilities planning principles enunciated in the Draft EIS/EIR and summarized in this chapter of the Final EIS/EIR. The State Water Resources Control Board proposes to offer grant assis- tance for design and construction of the selected sludge management program in the amount of 122 percent of the eligible costs as determined by the Board. To the extent that funds are available, EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board propose to offer grant assistance in the amount of 10 percent of eligible costs, as determined by the Board, for application of innovative or al- ternative systems included in the selected sludge management program. The City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and Orange County Sanitation Districts propose to finance all costs of design and construc- tion of the selected sludge management program to the extent that such costs are not eligible for grant assistance from the State of California and EPA. EPA proposes to condition grants for design and construction of the selected sludge management program to require compliance with all local permitting re- quirements and explicitly require compliance with requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. EPA proposes to condition grants for design and construction of the selected sludge management program on the submittal of a plan of operation for review and approval prior to the start of construction. EPA proposes to require that the plan of operation include explicit identification of actions for start-up and initial operation of the selected sludge management facilities, including pro- visions for training of agency forces or other means for effective operation and maintenance of facilities. BACKGROUND Wastewater systems managed by the three operating agencies are large region- alized systems. The bulk of the wastewater is processed at three large treat- ment complexes located near the Pacific Ocean. (See Figure 1 for geographical information) . Sludge processing is largely confined to these complexes. The Hyperion Treatment Plant, operated by the CLA, is located on a 144 acre site adjacent to the Los Angeles International Airport. Rated capacity of the plant is 420 million gallons per day (MGD) of primary treatment and 100 MGD of second- ary treatment. In 1978, the reported influent flow was about 345 MGD. Sludge from primary treatment and about one-half of the sludge from secondary treatment (i .e. waste activated sludge) is currently anaerobically digested. Total undi- 3 i KERN CO. I Barstow "Twenty—nine Palma Site EDWARDS AIR 26 mi.E.of Barstow Mojave Site 13 mi.t FORCE BASE N.of County Line 7i outh Edwards Site \ i ■ Stoddard Valley Site �O �o�y } Lancaster i MOJAVE DESERT a oQ� I SAN BERNARDINO CO. LOS ANGELE O. .1>� "■Lopez Canyon LandfillA. Fontana Site '0 9 °j 80 San Bernardino 6/ NA FWy 80 PO •Chino _ Puente Hills•Landfill ■Riverside to H erion Treatment Plant m KEY JWPCP RIVERSIDE CO. - �!F N \ O AGE CO. ' City of Los Angeles Bee Canyon Landfill Whites Point Fountain Valle � '- % L- Service Area r R CSD ♦1 Round Canyon Sit Los Angeles County Huntington Beach r'; • •• Sanitation Districts Service Area �Y gq Orange County OCSD f2 Coyote Canyon Landfill -'' Sanitation Districts Service Area ' ■ Potential Processing or Disposal Site ■ Prima Deshecha Landfill Drainage Boundary r F-1 PROJECT LOCATIONS —•— County Line Existing Outfalls 0 Approx. scale• 1 inch =17 miles PONAL OENANAOENENi►N06RAY FIG. • LOE AMELEO/OPANGE COUNTY METROPOLRAN AREA gested sludge production at Hyperion in 1978 has been estimated to be about 339 dry tons per day. Digestion destroyed about 175 dry tons per day, and the remaining 164 dry tons were discharged to the Pacific Ocean through a seven-mile submarine outfall . The Joint Water Pollution Control Plant located in the City of Carson is the major wastewater treatment complex operated by LACSD and has a rated capacity of 385 MGD for advanced primary treatment. The plant boundaries encompass a total of about 300 acres of which about 200 acres are available for wastewater system uses. Currently, no secondary treatment is provided, although secondary treat- ment facilities for 200 MGD of primary effluent are under construction and expected to be completed by 1983. Influent flow in 1978 was reported to be about 345 MGD. Sludges from five water reclamation plants in the Joint Outfall System are included in the influent flow to JWPCP. Primary sludge is anaero- bically digested and dewatered with centrifuges. Centrate from dewatering is blended with treated effluent, chlorinated on a seasonal basis, and discharged to the ocean through the outfall system. In 1978, about 515 dry tons per day of undigested sludge was produced. After digestion, a total of about 330 dry tons per day remained for disposal via reuse, landfilling, and ocean outfall . In 1978, OCSD collected and treated a total wastewater flow of about 191 MGD at the two plants which constitute the Joint Works. All flows receive primary treatment consisting of screening and sedimentation. Approximately 50 MGD of primary treated wastewater receives secondary treatment by means of the acti- vated sludge process. Secondary treatment facilities for an additional 75 MGD of primary effluent are under construction and projected to be in operation in 1981. Sludge is presently anaerobically digested and dewatered with centrifuges. Dewatered sludge is trucked from the Joint Works to the Coyote Canyon Landfill in Orange County where it is air dried and landfilled. In 1978 about 150 dry tons per day of undigested primary and about 30 dry tons per day of raw waste activated sludge were produced. After digestion, a total of about 117 dry tons per day remained for disposal . Projected sludge loads for the year 2000 are compared with 1978 levels in Table 1. The major increase in sludge should occur by year 2000 and year 2000 sludge volumes were selected as the basis for evaluation of alternatives. Projections for the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts include primary and waste acti- vated sludges from treatment of 150 MGD of wastewater at upstream water re- clamation facilities which will be processed at the Joint Water Pollution Control • Plant (JWPCP). Similarly, projections for the City of Los Angeles include pri- mary and waste activated sludges from treatment of 115 MGD at upstream facili- ties which will be processed at Hyperion. If a joint use facility serving all of Orange County is realized, the following year 2000 sludge loads from Southern Orange County Sanitation Agencies would be combined with sludges from OCSD for processing and disposal on land. Aliso Water Management Agency 19 dry tons per day Irvine Ranch Water District 30 dry tons per day Southeast Regional Reclamation Authority 33 dry tons per day 5 TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF PROJECTED SLUDGE LOADS WITH 1978 LEVELS LA/OMA OPERATING AGENCIES Vi 5 SECONDARY TREATMENT LEVEL YEAR 2000 SLUDGE LOADS PRIMARY WAS (a) TOTAL-RAW 1978 TOTAL DIGESTED SLUDGE i YEAR 2) (00 1978 (DTPD)(b)(g) (DTPO) b)(g) (OTPO) b)(g) TOTAL DIGESTED DIGESTED INCREASE (k) TREATMENT PLANT MGD MGO) (j) (OTPD)(b)(h)(i) (DTPD)(b)(h) PERCENT FULL I LACSD (c) 330 0 590 210 800 570 330 73 1 OCSD (d) 280 50 260 180 440 320 115 174 CLA (e) 400 100 320 220 540 390 165 138 1 Total 1,010 1,170 610 1,780 1,280 610 109 y MARINE i LACSD 200 590 130 720 505 330 53 OCSD ISO 260 95 355 250 115 114 CLA 150 320 85 405 28C 165 71 Total 500 1,170 310 1,480 1,035 610 69 (a) Waste activated sludge resulting from secondary treatment. 1\ (b) Dry tons per day. (c) Joint Water Pollution Control Plant operated by Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. Year 2000 projections provided by LACSD. d Orange County Sanitation Districts - Joint Works. (e) Hyperion Treatment Plant operated by the City of Los Angeles. f Term used by LA/DMA Project to describe a level of secondary treatment that may be permitted pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977. The values shown have been assumed by LA/OMA Project on' for purposes of evaluation of sludge management alternatives and should not be construed as approved pursuant to Section 30 (g} Undigested Sludge. (h) Total after anaerobic digestion. i) Includes sidestream recycle effects. (j) Does not include sidestream recycle effects. k Percent increase over 1978 levels projected to occur by year 2000. f1 1 Under conditions of full secondary treatment of wastewaters, year 2000 total digested sludge load is projected to be approximately double the digested sludge load in 1978. Each of the operating agencies have applied for Section 301(h) waivers of full secondary treatment. Sludge production under "marine secondary" { treatment levels is also shown in Table 1. A 70 percent increase in digested sludge production over 1978 levels is projected under marine secondary condi- tions and, depending on the agency, ranges from 72 to 88 percent of the sludge produced under full secondary treatment conditions. Existing sludge characteristics vary among the three operating agencies since each of the agencies operate large regional systems with a particular set of industrial contributors. In terms of current sludge characteristics, OCSD sludges are notably high in cadmium while LACSD sludges have considerably higher , concentrations of lead, chromium, and DDT. Other chemical characteristics are comparable among the three operating agencies. Measurements indicate that chemical characteristics (in terms of heavy metals and trace organics) of di- gested primary sludges and undigested waste activated sludges are not markedly different. ' Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1977 mandate implementation of industrial source control programs to preclude discharge of substances to the sewerage system which would interfere with sludge reuse or disposal programs. l i i 6 Significant reductions in most heavy metals concentrations in sludges appear achievable through application of pretreatment programs. Known metal plating industrial discharges offer the best prospects for immediate large scale re- ductions. Some heavy metals (mercury and arsenic) and chlorinated hydrocarbons (DDT and PCB) are not projected to change as a result of industrial pretreatment programs. Industrial pretreatment programs will not totally eliminate heavy metals from sludges. Domestic and uncontrollable sources currently exist and, as industrial contributions decline, will become a greater proportion of the total mass input to the treatment plants. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED PROGRAM Due to the large number of sludge processing and ultimate disposal options, it was essential that the number of alternatives be reduced to a manageable number. As analysis continued, an increasing number of options were deferred from further consideration. Those remaining at the end of the analysis were used to formulate the proposed sludge management program. Due to the broad scope and duration of the LA/OMA Project, the alternatives under investigation were periodically reorganized to facilitate the analysis. The first group of alternatives were termed candidate systems. Following a preliminary engineering analysis and initial site investigation, a number of options were deferred from further consideration. Those remaining were combined into six fundamental management concepts, termed Sludge Management Alternatives (SMA). Each concept incorporated a number of permutations so that the total number of systems being considered was still quite large. To facilitate the analysis, design criteria were developed for each unit process included in the SMA's and a computer program written to assist in the analysis. These tools allowed the engineering studies to be conducted in much greater depth, and were used in all subsequent analysis. As part of the analysis of the SMA's, efforts were made to locate potentially suitable sites in the metropolitan area and in surrounding desert and agricul- tural areas. Combining site information with results of the engineering analy- sis, a number of systems were again deferred from further consideration. Those remaining were twelve alternative Sludge Management Projects (SMP) . A number of options were incorporated into each SMP, but were reduced to a single option for each project. A description of the SMP's is presented in Table 2. Geographical information is provided in Figure 1. Each project was tied to specified sites for both processing and ultimate disposal . From the nearly infinite number of possible systems, the analysis identified twelve detailed treatment trains, ,y transportation routes, and corresponding sites for processing, reuse or disposal . The reduced number of management projects and the detail of their specification allowed serious consideration of all factors necessary to the decision making process. These considerations were broken into the four categories of quanti- tative engineering analysis, engineering practicability, environmental accept- ability, and implementation potential . Public input was incorporated into the study as part of implementation potential . 7 TABLE 2 ALTERNATIVE SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 1R1 Solar Drying Basins Pipeline transport of liquid digested sludge to a location in the Mojave Desert for dewa- tering by shallow open air basins equipped with underdrains and lined with 2 feet of clay or equivalent. Percolate return to the LA/OMA urban area via pipeline. Solar dried sludge at 60 percent solids would be stockpiled at the processing location until such time as a market for dried sludge products develops. 1R2 Desert Energy Project Same as the Solar Drying Basins project (IR1) except that solar dried sludge would be com- busted in a thermal reactor to achieve volume reduction and energy recovery. Residues disposed of at the processing location. 2R1 Centralized Dewatering and Pipeline transport of liquid digested sludge to a location in the Fontana area for mecha- Composting nical dewatering and windrow composting. Market composted sludge through a recycle center. Landfill compost which cannot be marketed. Liquid sidestreams would be returned to the LA/OMA area by pipeline. 2S1 Decentralized Dewatering and Compost dewatered sludge in enclosed structures at the respective operating agency treat- Composting ment plants. If needed, include dehydration for moisture control of feed material to compost system. Market composted sludge through recycle centers located at the plants. Landfill surplus compost. 2S1X Round Canyon From OCSD only, truck haul dewatered sludge to a site in lower Round Canyon in eastern Composting/Air Drying Orange County for processing by composting and air drying. Landfill disposal of dried sludge in Bee Canyon Landfill until adequate source control achieves acceptable sludge quality for recycling. 3S1 Energy Recovery from Sludge Dehydrate dewatered sludge to about 95 percent solids prior to combustion for volume reduction and energy recovery. Truck haul residues to landfill. 3S2 Energy Recovery from Sludge and Combine dewatered sludge with processed solid waste prior to combustion for volume reduc- Solid Haste tion and energy recovery. Truck residues to a landfill. 3R1 Energy Recovery from Sludge and Same as Project 2R1 except that dewatered sludge would be dehydrated and combined with Dairy Waste animal manure for combustion in a thermal reactor for volume reduction and energy recovery. Residues would be truck hauled to a landfill. 4S1 Deep Ocean Outfalls Discharge screened digested sludge to the Southern California Bight through new sludge-only outfalls at depths of about 1,000 feet. Truck residuals to a landfill. 4111 Barge Disposal Pipeline transport of liquid digested sludge to a central location in the Long Beach/ Los Angeles Harbor for barge disposal at sea. Disposal by dispersal over large areas about 60 miles offshore by means of a flexible pipe extended to depths of about 150 feet beneath the barge. DS1 Truck Dewatered Sludge to Landfills Truck haul dewatered sludge at 20-25 percent solids to sanitary landfills for disposal with incoming solid waste. 6S1 Baseline No-Project Provides a basis for comparison of alternative SMP's and corresponds to the No-Project alternative required to be analyzed by NEPA and CEQA. Involves use of sludge facilities committed prior to December 31, 1978. Note: Letter in project number indicates project type: R = regional alternative Sc individual alternative. 1 i 8 A number of additional studies were conducted, the information from which was used in formulation and analysis of the Alternative Sludge Management Projects. Important among these were demonstration projects conducted by the LA/OMA Pro- ject and other special technical studies. Demonstration studies were conducted in the following areas: cultivation of crops on sludge amended soils, pyrolysis of refuse and sewage sludge, thermal pretreatment, composting, dewatering, dehy- dration, thermal gasification of dehydrated sludge, landfilling of dewatered sludge, and solar evaporation of liquid sludge. Each of the alternative sludge management projects were analyzed by a team of LA/OMA Project staff and consultants. Comparative evaluation of the alternative sludge management projects was based upon consideration of: environmental accept- ability in terms of potential benefits and adverse impacts and the ability to mitigate the latter; engineering practicability in terms of the qualitative factors of feasibility, flexibility, reliability, and occupational concerns; implementation potential in terms of anticipated regulatory compatibility, prac- ticality, and public acceptance; quantitative characteristics consisting of economics, energy production and consumption, and estimates of direct mass emission rates of air pollutants. Rankings of alternatives for each qualitative consideration were combined to- gether with the ranking of quantitative characteristics for comparison of al- ternatives. From this comparison, the following conclusions were drawn regarding prospects for inclusion of the various alternatives in the proposed sludge management program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area. • Decentralized Dewatering and Composting (2S1 and 2S1X) , Energy Recovery from sludge (3S1) , and Truck Dewatered Cake to Landfill (DS1) would provide the best long-term prospects for inclusion in the Proposed Sludge Manage- ment Program. • Energy Recovery from Sludge and Solid Waste (3S2) could, from a technical point of view, be implemented at some future date as an expansion of Pro- ject 3S1. • Deep Ocean Outfalls (4S1) appeared to offer better prospects than barge Disposal (01) , although additional study would be required before a defi- nitive conclusion could be reached regarding either option. • Solar Drying Basins (1R1) , the Desert Energy Project (1R2), Centralized Dewatering and Composting (2R1) , Energy Recovery from Sludge and Dairy Wastes (3R1) , and the Baseline No-Project Alternative (6S1) were found to have the poorest prospects for sludge management. The Proposed Sludge Management Program is a logical outgrowth of the analysis and comparative evaluation of alternatives, as well as consideration of the major factors associated with composting, energy recovery, and landfill dispo- sal . Basic to the program is the concept of minimization of environmental , social , economic, and technological risks involved while providing flexibility to respond to changing requirements, current unknowns, and information gained through monitoring of initial performance of planned facilities. Detailed facility requirements were developed through application of those options de- termined to present the best long-term prospects to the unique situations asso- ciated with each operating agency. 9 The timeframe for implementation of the proposed sludge management program is composed of three phases. Phase I consists of sludge management planning by the LA/OMA Project and concludes with approval of the facilities plan and environ- mental documents by the State and EPA at the end of 1980. Phase II consists of design, construction, operation, and monitoring of sludge management facilities to firmly establish performance efficiencies and substantiate economic, environ- mental , and engineering projections while providing for acceptable management of sludge. Decisions regarding expansion, deletion, or replacement of facilities would be made at the conclusion of Phase II or after a reasonable period of ; operation has provided an adequate basis for such decision.. Phase II is anti- cipated to be concluded within about 10 years after completion of Phase I. Phase III will consist of actions necessary to carry out decisions reached at the end of Phase II. Planning by the LA/OMA Project has defined currently available options based upon full secondary treatment of all wastewaters. These Phase III options therefore may also be exercised if full secondary treatment of all wastewaters is required prior to the end of Phase II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOSURE A public participation program, designed to encourage and provide opportunities for public involvement in the formulation of the proposed sludge management pro- gram, has been an ongoing activity since the early phases of the LA/OMA Project. ; The Joint Goal Statement, adopted by the LA/OMA Project Policy Board in 1975, included a charge to "include the broadest possible participation by the public as well as political and institutional interests." Prior to the publication of the Draft EIS/EIR, a number of approaches were used to encourage public involvement. Information was disseminated through brochures and newsletters, publication of articles in journals and newspapers, presenta- tions, and speaking engagements. A public hearing, public workshops, and numer- ous coordination meetings were held to brief interested citizens and agencies regarding Project activities and to provide opportunities for follow-up parti- cipation. Wide distribution was made of the Draft EIS/EIR, the principal disclosure docu- ment leading to the selection of a sludge management program for the LA/OMA area. The complete Draft EIS/EIR was provided to about 500 persons and agencies throughout the United States and nearly 100 libraries in the LA/OMA area. Copies of the Summary Draft EIS/EIR were distributed to more than 3500 persons throughout the United States. A Public Hearing, consisting of three consecutive evening sessions at the individual treatment plant sites, was held to receive e public comment on the Draft EIS/EIR. The period for public review and comment on the Draft EIS/EIR concluded as of close of business on July 21, 1980. Public response to the Draft EIS/EIR was in the form of: letters written by public agencies, private organizations, and citizens; written testimony sub- mitted as part of the record of the Public Hearing held on July 8, 9, 10, 1980; verbal comments presented at the Public Hearing and documented in the official transcript of the Public Hearing; and correspondence received after close of the public review period on July 21, 1980. 1 10 A total of 51 written comments were received during the public review period for the Draft EIS/EIR. Nearly 85% of the written comments were submitted by local and regional agencies, federal agencies, and interested citizens and organiza- tions. A total of 25 persons presented verbal comments at the public hearing. Total attendance at the public hearing was 99 persons. Major issues raised as a result of the public review process centered in the following areas: • Need to avoid nuisance conditions (i .e. odor, noise, dust) which might arise from operation of the proposed facilities. • A desire to minimize air quality and public health impacts. • Concern over reliability of the proposed facilities. 0 Questions regarding the cost and environmental impact of the proposed facilities compared to ocean disposal of sludge through existing outfalls. • Site specific issues related to siting of the proposed faciliites for OCSD. A Final EIS/EIR was prepared to respond to comments received as a result of public review of the Draft EIS/EIR and to inform the public of the outcome of the process. Each of the local operating agencies have assumed responsibility for providing opportunities for continuing involvement of those persons ex- pressing interest in their respective programs. SELECTED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT After review of public comments on the management program proposed in the Draft EIS/EIR and completion of the environmental review process, a sludge management program was selected which provides for management of the wastewater sludges produced by the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and Orange County Sanitation Districts. Projects for each of these agencies are described in the following sections. CITY OF LOS ANGELES Thermal processing of dehydrated, dewatered sludge has been found to be most feasible alternative for the City of Los Angeles. The project is compatible with applicable regulatory requirements, can be implemented within the existing treatment plant boundaries, involves minimal truck traffic, and provides for resource recovery through production of electricity and steam for use in the processing of wastewaters and sludges. Project Description A conceptual diagram of the selected facilities is presented in Figure 2. All waste activated sludge (WAS): will be thickened and anaerobically digested, 11 i WORK ELECTRICITY & STEAM i AIR EXISTING IC COMBINED AIR DISCHARGE ENGINES CYCLE DISCHARGE POWERPLANT GAS PRIMARY CLEANUP WAS SLUDGE RAW RAW DIGESTER GAS i 1 ANAEROBIC ANAEROBIC I THICKENING DIGESTION DIGESTION MECHANICAL DEWATERING l 4 DEHYDRATION STEAFI ELECTRICITY THERMAL STEAM PROCESSING TURBINE ` AIR DISCHARGE TRUCK STEAM TRANSPORT OF ASH S HEAT AIR EMISSION LANDFILL RECOVERY CLEANUP r i KEY *IF NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A NET EMISSION INCREASE OF 150 LBS/DAY SOX OR LESS. INPUTS TO THE SYSTEM NOTE: MECHANICAL COMPOSTING DEMO Q UNrr PROCESSES AT TERMINAL ISLAND TP NOT O USEFUL PRODUCTS SHOWN O END POINTS OF THE SYSTEM OVERVIEW OF FACILITIES IC-INTERNAL COMBUSTION C� REQUIREMENTS WAS-WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE CITY OF LOS ANGELES OREO'ONAL ELt=I MANAGEMENT PROGRAM /1 LOE ANGILE!/ORANGE COUNTY MITRO►OLITAN AREA FIG. ` 12 either separately or in combination with primary sludge (PS) . Digested PS and WAS will be mechanically dewatered and dehydrated using the Carver-Greenfield drying process. Dried product from the dehydration process will be thermally processed for energy recovery. Energy from combustion will be extracted in a waste heat boiler. Steam will be used for electrical power generation in a steam turbine and for process applications in the dehydration system. Char and ash produced during thermal processing will be truck hauled to Lopez Canyon landfill or identified alternative Sites for disposal . The project description remains essentially unchanged from that in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. It is noted however that various thermal processing systems will be eval- uated during design. Certain air pollution control mitigation measures have been added, however. A number of decisions remain to be made concerning use of digester gas. Cur- rently, some digester gas is sold directly to the Scattergood Power Plant with the remainder used primarily in internal combustion (IC) engine drives. The Phase II facilities include provision for construction of a combined cycle power generation system (CCP). A decision has not been made regarding the. quantity of digester gas to be combusted in the combined cycle plant and the number of IC engine drives to be retired from service. At a minimum, sufficient IC engines would be retired to assure compliance with new source (air emission) review requirements. Remaining digester gas could be used in the combined cycle plant or processed for sale and off-site use. Decisions regarding the size of the combined cycle power plant and the extent of continued use of IC engines will be made early in the design phase of the program. An advanced air cleanup train will be used to reduce emissions of atmospheric pollutants and to comply with Regulation IV and Regulation XIII , New Source Review (NSR) of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . One means for compliance with NSR without resort to external offsets is projected using the following air pollution control strategies, however, the exact nature of the control system will be established as part of the permitting process. • Partial or complete retirement or cleanup of existing IC engines and re- placement with a combined cycle power (CCP) system or off-site sale of digester gas or digester gas products. • Water injection or selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for NOx control on the CCP system. 0 Removal of H2S from digester gas prior to combustion to reduce emissions of Sox. H2S concentrations less than 5 ppmv appear achievable. • Use of State-of-the-art particulate control systems that achieve efficient capture of the sub-micron size fraction. An outlet particulate loading of about 0.0005 gr/ACF @ 400OF appears achievable with electrostatically augmented baghouse technology. • Use of selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) or selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or equivalent to control NOx emissions from thermal pro- cessing. SCR appears capable of achieving 90 percent NOx reduction. SNCR may not provide sufficient NOx reduction depending on the availability of NOx offsets from IC engine retirement and may not comply with the defini- tion of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) if such is necessary. 13 i Ir- s L- WNW— I (l .=TV _r Tlf '�F�•_' skid ;I These internal combustion engines have been operated at Hyperion Treatment Plant for more than 25 years.Digester gas is used in the engines to produce electricity and to drive air blowers used in waste- water treatment.A powerplant equipped with turbine generating systems will replace these engines ano use the gas from anaerobic digestion of the sludge to produce electricity for use'within the Treatment Plant Replacement of internal combustion engines with a combined cycle turbine generating system enables propuction of electricity with lower air pollutant emissions A similar change will occur at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant operated by Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. 14 • Flue gas desulfurization and acid gas control to outlet SOx concentrations of 20 to 50 ppmv (as S02) or less. Requirements for intermediate storage, standby capacity, management of liquid sidestreams, demonstration facilities, preliminary site layout and ultimate disposal locations are described in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. An alternate transportation route of Pershing Drive to Culver Blvd. to Highway 90 to reach the ,northbound San Diego Freeway will be examined during facility design. Phase III options have been defined for each of the LA/OMA operating agencies from information available at the time of program development. It is recognized that new information may become available during Phase II which could alter the range of options available during Phase III. The Phase III options, however, provide identification of currently indicated long range alternatives. For the City of Los Angeles, the most reasonable Phase III option appears to be expan- sion of the Phase II dehydration/thermal processing system. Economics CAPITAL AND 0 & M COST FACTORS Based on cost estimating assumptions USED IN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF presented in the Draft Facilities Plan, PHASE II FACILITIES a total capital cost of $85,910,000 is estimated for the Phase II facilities, which is equivalent to $8,082,000/yr. Total annual 0 & M is estimated at ITEM RATE $9,417,000/yr with credits for the value of net electricity produced at Labor $14.50/hr $5,078,000/yr. The net system cost, defined as annual capital plus 0 & M less credits, is about $12,421,000/yr. Diesel $0.65/gal The latter is equivalent to about $84/dry ton of raw sludge processed Electricity $0.04/KWH through the system. Annual capital and operating costs to the CLA, assuming local share of capital costs at 12.5% Polymer $2/1b and 0 & M costs at 100%, is estimated at $10,427,000/yr. Based on a 1980 Isopar-L $1.50/gal service area population of 2.94 million persons, the direct cost per person is Dump Charge $3/wet ton estimated to be about $3.55/yr. ENR (May 1979) 3500 Implementation Amortization Factors .09349 (20 years) Phase II facilities for the City of (for 6-7/8% interest per .14156 (10 years) Los Angeles Hyperion Treatment Plant EPA requirements) .24307 ( 5 years) Will , as a minimum, be sized to accom- modate all sludge from primary treat- ment of 400 MGD of wastewater plus the waste activated sludge from secondary treatment of 150 MGD of primary effluent. 15 PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III FACILITIES PLAN PROJECT REPORT ENERGY ................. 1 ::...... RECOVERY ................_.. ai...,.....a.a i.... MECHANICAL i COMPOST ........ .............a...,.a.a....... DEMO PHASE III FACILITIES ............... ............... ............... 1979 1980 1982 1984 1986 t988 1990 KEY - w°uT ME OVERRfKRf -OEigN Y T;A O.E RATE RNO EY"IU.TE P FACILITIES SCHEDULE ♦ OTATEt-" 0 AL3 CITY OF LOS ANGELEB IR••-=.I••�••b.• .• • ........ FIG. 3 The foregoing treatment levels have been specified in the City' s application for waiver for secondary treatment requirements. Should additional secondary treat- ment be required, Phase II facilities would need to be expanded to accommodate a larger volume of waste activated sludge. A decision regarding the application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements has not yet been made. Should secondary treatment of all wastewaters be required, Phase II facilities re- quirements would be identical to the sludge loadings described for Phase III options. The facilities schedule for the City of Los Angeles is predicated upon State and EPA approval of the facilities plan, environmental documents, and supplemental project report by the end of 1980 and is shown in Figure 3. Some delays have been encountered in initiating the supplemental project report but major changes in the schedule for design and construction are not anticipated at this time. Facilities planning and design principles identified in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan remain essentially unchanged. Key principles are summar- ized as follows: System Reliability: A high level of reliability and flexibility will be incor- porated in the design by providing standby capacity in key unit processes, a high level of intermediate storage, and conservative design provisions to allots operational flexibility. 16 Air Emission Controls: Advanced air pollution control systems and retirement or cleanup of existing plant emission sources will be used to comply with prohi- bitory rules and new source review regulations of the SCAQMD. This will assure a reduction in emission levels from present conditions or, at worst, no increase greater than 150 lb/day (750 lb/day in the case of carbon monoxide) . Nuisance Controls: A conservative design approach will be used to assure that odor, dust, noise, or other nuisance conditions from the Phase II facilities will not result beyond the treatment plant boundary. Administrative actions relating to preparation of supplemental project reports, permit acquisition, operator recruitment, and contractual arrangements are des- cribed in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Additionally, the City of Los Angeles is considering obtaining assistance from private firms and/or knowledgeable individuals for facility start-up and operator training. Policy actions relating to air quality, industrial source control , and public participation remain essentially as described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Questions have recently arisen concerning the applicability of AB 524 (Calvo) in the South Coast Air Basin. However, use of advanced air pollution control equipment should allow full compliance with NSR regulations without use of AB 524 provisions. Additionally, the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts will cooperate in the development of data required for filing of applications with the SCAQMD for permits to construct the proposed facilities. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures A summary of environmental impacts resulting from the selected project is pre- sented in Table 3. Also shown are the mitigation measures included in the selected project as a result of public review of the Draft EIS/EIR. The impacts shown are those which will result from the selected project including the added mitigation measures. Major mitigation measures added to the project description are in the area of air pollution control systems and design of nuisance control systems. The proposed Phase II facilities will incorporate air pollution control strate- gies designed to comply with Regulation IV and Regulation XIII , New Source Review (NSR), of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . The i latter regulation requires that affected stationary sources comply with all appropriate District rules and regulations, and that all emission increases greater than 150 pounds per day, except carbon monoxide for which the limitation is 750 pounds per day, be adequately offset. One means for compliance with NSR has been projected using the control strategies and advanced air cleanup systems discussed under "Project Description" above. Application of the above control measures can result in emission decreases for all pollutants (i .e. TSP, NOx, SOx, CO, and HC) from 1978 Base emissions. At the very worst, no emission increase greater than 150 pounds per day will re- sult, 750 pounds per day in the case of carbon monoxide. In addition, state-of- the-art particulate control technology will be used to assure no adverse impact 17 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Geohydrology and Water Quality No adverse impact on surface and/or groundwater Total mitigation in plan ' quality. Air Quality No adverse impact on air quality. Advanced air pollution control systems and cleanup or retirement of existing sources will be used to achieve compliance with new source review. Archaeological Sites No adverse impact since a complete field survey No mitigation necessary determined that none were present. Visual Character Construction of new buildings similar to existing The use of screenings and landscaping to reduce visual structures and exhaust flue gas stacks will be impact will be evaluated during design. Some impact necessary. Some unavoidable adverse impact. is unavoidable. Nuisances No adverse impacts from odor, dust, noise or Facility design will incorporate control systems to other nuisance conditions. assure that nuisance conditions will not result beyond po the treatment plant boundary. Air Pollutants No adverse impact from combined cycle or thermal Advanced air pollution control systems and cleanup or processing systems is projected. retirement of existing sources will be used to achieve compliance with new source review. Stack dispersal result in small ground level concentration increments from combined cycle and thermal processing sources. Heavy Metals No adverse impact will result from the potential State-of-the-art particulate control with efficient discharge of heavy metals during thermal pro- capture of the sub-micron size fraction will be used cessing. to reduce particulate emissions and associated heavy metals to the lowest achievable levels. The City will continue to implement industrial source control programs to reduce heavy metal concentrations. Trace Organics Thermal processing will be designed to destroy Total mitigation in plan. trace organics, a beneficial impact. Pathogens Thermal processing will destroy pathogens con- Total mitigation in plan. tained in sludge. A beneficial impact. Transportation Minor potential problems in vicinity of disposal CalTrans and other appropriate agencies will review the sites and entrance to Hyperion. No significant traffic pattern during facility design to determine if problems on major arterials. any corrective measures are required. TABLE 3 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Waste Disposal No significant reduction in landfill capacity is No mitigation necessary projected due to the small quantity of char/ash produced. Wastewater Treatment No significant adverse impacts will result from No mitigation necessary recycle of liquid sidestreams to the Hyperion plant due to the nature and relatively low volume of the sidestreams. Water Supply No significant adverse impact on potable water Total mitigation in plan supplies since plant effluent will be used for most water demands. Energy Beneficial impact since net energy will be produced No mitigation necessary. from a renewable organic resource. 1° Public Sector Unavoidable adverse impact since a significant Local capital fundina reauirements can be reduced if public investment for capital and operating costs federal/state funding is obtained from one or more is required. available programs. Private Sector A beneficial impact will result from stimulation No mitigation necessary of activity in the private sector of the economy. Employment Beneficial impact from increase in employment during No mitigation necessary the construction phase. Short Term Use Vs.. Long Term Alteration of visual character is the only impact Use of advanced air pollution control strategies to Productivity which precludes future beneficial uses. achieve compliance with new source review and use of state-of-the-art particulate control will avoid long-term adverse impacts on air quality and public health from air pollutants and heavy metals from com- bined cycle and thermal processing sources. Irreversible Committment of Public monetary expenditures and use of nonrenew- The investment of nonrenewable resources will achieve Resources able resources such as fluidizing oil , polymers, net energy production from a renewable resource. diesel fuel , lime, and ammonia. Growth Inducing Impacts No significant growth inducing impacts will result. No mitigation necessary from the possible discharge of heavy metals. Efficient capture of sub-micron size particles will be provided by the particulate control system. Design of the Phase Ix facilities will incorporate control measures to assure that nuisance conditions will not result beyond the treatment plant boundaries. Building enclosures, soundproofing, and other acoustical techniques will be used to control noise levels from both stationary and mobile sources. Dusts will be controlled by providing pelleting facilities, ventilation, and air cleanup systems where appropriate. The proposed Phase II facilities will have a low odor potential due to the use of thermal processing which is extremely effective in odor destruction. Other techniques such as coverage, venting, and deodori- zation of gases from odorous sources will be employed as necessary to assure that odors are not transported outside the treatment plant boundary. Unavoidable adverse impacts will result only with respect to visual character alteration and use of public sector monies for construction and operation. No other significant adverse impacts have been identified. Beneficial impacts will result from the destruction of trace organics and pathogens, production of energy from a renewable resource, stimulation of the private sector economy and resulting increase in employment during the construction phase. Alteration of visual character is the only, impact which will preclude future beneficial uses. Expenditure of public monies and use of nonrenewable resources represent an irreversible commitment of resources. Nonrenewable resources used will include fluidizing oil in the dehydration system, organic polymers for mechanical de- watering, diesel fuel for mobile equipment, lime (or other caustic) for flue gas desulfurization, and ammonia for NOx reduction. However, investment of the nonrenewable resources will achieve energy recovery from the renewable organics in sludge. Energy recovered from the renewable sludge resource will be greater than that associated with consumption of the nonrenewable resources. There will be no significant growth inducing impacts as a result of the project. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A combination of thermal processing, composting, and landfill disposal has been found to be the most feasible alternative for the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. The project is compatible with applicable regulatory requirements, can be implemented within the existing treatment plant boundaries, and provides for resource recovery through production of electricity and steam for use in the processing of wastewaters and sludges and through production of compost material . The project description remains essentially unchanged from that in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. It is noted however that vairous thermal pro- cessing systems will be evaluated during design. Certain air pollution control mitigation measures have been added. Project Description A conceptual diagram of the selected facilities is presented in Figure 4. All waste activated sludge (WAS) will be thickened and anaerobically digested, 20 Windrow composting and recycling of composted sludge has been prac- ticed since 1972 by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant. Under the proposed plan,dusts and odors from conventional windrow composting will be reduced as a result p f of modifications that will be made to improve operating performance and wet weather capability. Note steam rising from the windrow indicating elevated temperatures in the windrow. — ,y cy_ � t The Carver-Greenfield process, first investigated by the City of Los Angeles in 1975.is an innovative energy efficient system for producing dry sludge that can be combusted without addition of supplemental fuels such as fuel oil.Nearly 70 Carver-Greenfield installations are operating in the rendering, food processing. and dairy industries. Units have been installed in Japan at Hiroshima and Fukuchiyama City(shown at left)to process sludge generated by municipal wastewater treatment plants.A facility at Coors Brewery in Golden,Colorado processes waste activated sludge at the brewery waste treatment facility.The process is a key ele- ment in the thermal processing for energy recovery systems that will be used at the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Treatment Plant and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts.(Photo courtesy of Foster-Wheeler Energy Corporation) 21 WORK ELECTRICITY & STEAM AIR DIRECT DRIVE COMBINED AIR DISCHARGE IC ENGINES CYCLE DISCHARGE POWERPLANT GAS CLEANUP PRIMARY WAS SLUDGE RIL RAW A DIGESTER GAS ANAEROBIC ANAEROBIC THICKENING DIGESTION DIGESTION MECHANICAL DEWATERING ADVANCED MECHANICAL WINDROW COMPOSTING DEHYDRATION STEAM ELECTRICITY COMPOSTING DEMONSTRATION RECYCLE THERMAL STEAM CENTER PROCESSING TURBINE AIR DISCHARGE SOIL STEAM AMENDMENT TRUCK TRANSPORT OF RESIDUALS HEAT ECLEANUP SSION (EXCESS COMPOST, DEWATERED SLUDGE, ASH) RECOVERY I LANDFILL KEY *IF NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A NET EMISSION Q INPUTS TO THE SYSTEM INCREASE OF 150 LBS/DAY SOX OR LESS. UNIT PROCESSES NOTE: PASTEURIZATION DEMO NOT SHOWN CD USEFUL PRODUCTS O END POINTS OF THE SYSTEM OVERVIEW OF FACILITIES IC-INTERNAL COMBUSTION REQUIREMENTS WAS-WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE CU=ILOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EOS ANGEIF!ONANOENCON TV Y[TROPOl1TAN•RE• FIG. 4 22 either separately or in combination with primary sludge (PS) . Existing mechani- cal dewatering facilities at JWPCP will be expanded and modified as necessary to process sludge loadings expected during Phase II. The facility will be designed to process either combined sludges or separated streams. Separate conveyance and wet cake storage facilities will be provided as necessary to process in the separated mode. Following mechanical dewatering a portion of the sludge (about 75-150 dtpd average) will be truck hauled and disposed at the Puente Hills Sanitary Land- fill , which is currently being equipped with a leachate control system. A second portion of the sludge (about 100-150 dtpd) will be composted using an advanced windrow composting system. Compost product will be reused via an on- site recycle center or landfill disposed if not marketable. The term advanced windrow composting embodies several improvements over windrow composting as presently practiced at JWPCP. Elements considered important in design of the advanced compost system were discussed in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. A recycle center is currently operated on the JWPCP facility by a private com- pany. Existing physical facilities will continue in operation under contractual arrangements that are negotiated from time to time by LACSD. Modifications to this facility may be necessary, taking into consideration the visual attractive- ness to the local community and potential nuisance conditions. Possibilities include enclosed buildings for all dusty or odorous material and operations; increased set-back of structures from the street and construction of appropriate screening to reduce the visual impact of the facility. Remaining sludge (about 250 dtpd) will be dehydrated using the Carver-Greenfield drying process. Dried product from the dehydration process will be thermally processed for energy recovery. Energy from combustion will be extracted in a waste heat boiler. Steam will be used for electrical power generation in a steam turbine and for process applications in the dehydration system. Char and ash produced during thermal processing will be truck hauled to Puente Hills Landfill or identified alternative sites for disposal . Digester gas will be combusted in a combined cycle power (CCP) generation facil- ity for energy recovery. A portion of digester gas may continue to be used in existing internal combustion (IC) engines. An advanced air cleanup train will be used to reduce emissions of atmospheric pollutants and to comply with Regulation IV and Regulation XIII , New Source Review (NSR) , of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . One means for compliance with NSR without resort to external offsets is projected using the following air pollution control strategies. It should, however, be noted that LACSD is preparing alternative strategies for compliance with NSR and the exact nature of the control system will be established as part of the per- mitting system. • Partial or complete retirement or cleanup of existing IC engines and re- placement with a combined cycle power (CCP) system. • Water injection or selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for NOx control on the CCP system. 23 • Removal of H2S from digester gas prior to combustion to reduce SOX emis- sions. H2S concentrations less than 5 ppmv appear achievable. • Use of state-of-the-art particulate control systems that achieve efficient capture of the sub-micron size fraction. An outlet particulate loading of about 0.0005 gr/ACF @ 400OF appears achievable with electrostatically aug- mented baghouse technology. • Use of selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) or selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or equivalent to control NOX emissions from thermal pro- cessing. SCR appears capable of achieving 90 percent NOX reduction. SNCR may not provide sufficient NOX reduction depending on the availability of NOX offsets from IC engine retirement and may not comply with the defini- tion of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) if such is necessary. • Flue gas desulfurization and acid gas control to outlet SOX concentrations of 20 ppmv as S02 or less. Requirements for intermediate storage, standby capacity and management of liquid sidestreams remain as described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Preliminary site layout, ultimate disposal location and transportation routes are described in the Final EIS/EIR. Demonstration facilities remain as described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan except that a decision regarding pelleting and heat drying of mechanical composting outfeed will be deferred for consideration during design of the facilities. Phase III options have been defined for each of the LA/OMA operating agencies from information available at the time of program development. It is recognized that new information may become available during Phase II which could alter the range of options available during Phase III. The Phase III options, however, provide identification of currently indicated long range alternatives. For the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, reasonable Phase III options appear to be continuation of Phase II facilities; complete reliance on energy recovery via dehydration/thermal processing; and complete reliance on mechanical composting. Landfilling of dewatered sludge is not a viable long range alternative. Economics i Based on cost estimating assumptions presented in the Draft Facilities Plan, a total capital cost of $123,087,000 is estimated for the Phase II facilities, which is equivalent to $11,814,000/yr. Total annual 0 & M is estimated at $14,655,000/yr with credits for the value of fuel , electricity, and compost produced at $7,621,000/yr. The net system cost, defined as annual capital plus 0 & M less credits, is about $18,848,000/yr. The latter is equivalent to about $72/dry ton of raw sludge processed through the system. Annual capital and operating costs to LACSD, assuming local share of capital costs at 12.5% and 0 & M costs at 100%, is estimated at $16,132,000/yr. Based on a 1980 service area population of 3.72 million persons, the cost per person is estimated to be about $4.34/yr. (Capital and 0 & M cost factors are listed on page 15. ) 24 Implementation Phase II facilities for Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts' Joint Water Pollution Control Plant will , as a minimum, be sized to accommodate all sludge from primary treatment of 330 MGD of wastewater plus the waste activated sludge from secondary treatment of 200 MGD of primary effluent. The foregoing treat- ment levels have been specified in the Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements. Should additional secondary treatment be required, Phase II facilities would need to be expanded to accommodate a larger volume of waste activated sludge. A decision regarding the application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements has not yet been made. Should secondary treatment of all wastewaters be required, Phase II facilities require- ments would be identical to the sludge loadings described for. Phase III options. The facilities schedule for the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts is pre- dicated upon State and EPA approval of the facilities Plan, environmental docu- ments, and supplemental project report by the end of 1980 and is shown in Fig- ure 5. No major changes in the schedule for design and construction are anti- cipated at this time. PHASE I PHASE II PHASE 111 FACILITIES PLAN PROJECT REPORT ENERGY RECOVERY ADVANCED WINDROW iii:iiiii "iii•"""'' COMPOSTING iiiiiiiiii:iii:a:..::•J:•::v:i:iii%i:: LANDFILL DEW ATERED ..i......... SLUDGE ..... .... MECHANICAL ,,,....... COMPOST :iiiii..... DEMO ..i..........i.. PASTEUR- IZATION " DEMO � aii..aua.... PHASE UI .............. FACILITIES 1979 1980 1982 1984 1985 1988 1990 KEY O ROUTM DVERAIIONE -DEtN1N O CONbT TN ®On RATE AND EVMUA76 ❑ FACILITIES SCHEDULE IOR ANO C R"Tl DEEORITRUCT M DVICATIONE • ETATEIEAA APRROVALE OLOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS tERTIAL RTART w O • ,. •. FIG. 6 25 Facilities planning and design principles identified in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan remain essentially unchanged. Key principles are sum- marized as follows: System Reliability: A high level of reliability and flexibility will be incor- porated in the design by providing standby capacity in key unit processes, a high level of intermediate storage, and conservative design provisions to allow operational flexibility. Air Emission Controls: Advanced air pollution control systems and retirement or cleanup of existing plant emission sources will be used to comply with pro- hibitory rules and new source review regulations of the SCAQMD. This will assure a reduction in emission levels from present conditions or, at worst, no increase greater than 150 lb/day (750 lb/day in the case of carbon monoxide) . Nuisance Controls: A conservative design approach will be used to assure that odor, dust, noise, or other nuisance conditions from the Phase' II facilities will not result beyond the treatment plant boundary. Administrative actions relating to preparation of supplemental project reports, permit acquisition, operator recruitment, and contractual arrangements are described in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. The possibility of using contractual services for start-up will be evaluated during the design phase of the program. Policy actions relating to air quality, industrial source control , and public participation remain essentially as described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Questions have recently arisen concerning the applicability of AB 524 (Calvo) in the South Coast Air Basin. However, use of advanced air pollution control equipment should allow full compliance with NSR regulation without use of AB 524 provisions. Additionally, the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts will cooperate in the development of data required for filing of applications to the SCAQMD for permits to construct the proposed facilities. i Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures A summary of environmental impacts resulting from the proposed project is pre- sented in Table 4. Also shown are the mitigation measures included in the project description as a result of public review of the Draft EIS/EIR. The impacts shown are those which will result from the proposed project including the added mitigation measures. Major mitigation measures added to the project description are in the area of air pollution control systems. and design of nuisance control systems. The proposed Phase II facilities will incorporate air pollution control strate- gies designed to comply with Regulation XIII, New Source Review (NSR) , of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . This regulation requires that affected stationary sources comply with all appropriate District rules and 26 regulations, and that all emission increases greater than 150 pounds per day except carbon monoxide for which the limitation is 750 pounds per day, be ade- quately offset. One means for compliance with NSR has been projected using the control strate- gies and advanced air cleanup systems discussed under "Project Description" above. Application of the above control measures can result in emission re- ductions for particulates, NOx, and HC from 1978 Base emission. At the very worst, no emission increase greater than 150 pounds per day will result, 750 pounds per day in the case of carbon monoxide. In addition, state-of-the-art particulate control technology will be used to assure no adverse impact from the possible discharge of heavy metals. Efficient capture of sub-micron size particles will be provided by the particulate control system. Design of the Phase II facilities will incorporate control measures to assure that nuisance conditions outside the treatment plant boundary are not increased but instead reduced. Building enclosures, soundproofing, and other acoustical techniques will be used to control noise levels from both stationary and mobile sources. Dust will- be controlled by providing pelleting facilities, ventilation, and air cleanup systems where appropriate. Both odors and dust from composting should be reduced from present levels using the control measures discussed as part of advanced windrow composting in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Unavoidable adverse impacts will result only in the areas of visual character alteration and use of public sector monies for construction and operation. No other significant adverse impacts have been identified. Beneficial impacts will result from the destruction of trace organics and pathogens, production of energy from a renewable resource, resource recovery from use of compost mater- ial , stimulation of the private sector economy and resulting increase in employ- ment during the construction phase. Alteration of visual character is the only impact which will preclude future beneficial uses. Nuisance conditions have the potential to preclude beneficial uses but the Phase II facilities should result in improvements from present conditions. Expenditure of public monies and use of nonrenewable resources represent an irreversible committment of resources. Nonrenewable resources used will include fluidizing oil in the dehydration system, organic polymers for mechanic] de- watering, diesel fuel for mobile equipment, lime (or other caustic) for flue gas desulfurization, and ammonia for NOx reduction. However, investment of the nonrenewable resources will achieve energy recovery from the renewable organics in sludge and resource recovery in the form of compost product. Energy re- covered from the renewable sludge resource will be greater than that associated with consumption of the nonrenewable resources. There will be no significant growth inducing impacts as a result of the project. 27 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Geohydrology and Water Quality No adverse impact on surface and/or groundwater Total mitigation in plan quality will result at JWPCP. A leachate control system will prevent adverse impacts at the Puente Hills Landfill. Air Quality No significant adverse impact on air quality Advanced air pollution control systems and cleanup or retirement of existing sources will be used to achieve compliance with new source review. Terrestrial Biota No adverse impacts. Sensitive biotic species in Total mitigation in plan an area adjacent to potential expansion will be protected. Archaeological Sites No adverse impacts. Suspected archaeological re- Total mitigation in plan sources will be protected through a cultural re- sources mitigation program. ro Visual Character Construction of new buildings similar to existing The use of screenings and landscaping to reduce visual O0 structures and exhaust flue gas stacks will be impact will be evaluated during design. Some impact necessary. Some unavoidable adverse impact. is unavidable. Nuisances The windrow composting operation can potentially The advanced windrow composting concept should reduce produce odors and dusts. odor and dust nuisances from present levels. Additional mitigation measures are available if nuisance reduction is not sufficient to meet community standards. Facility design will incorporate control systems to assure that nuisance conditions from other sludge processing will not result beyond the treatment plant boundary. Air Pollutants No adverse impact from combined cycle or thermal Advanced air pollution control systems and cleanup or processing systems is projected. retirement of existing sources will be used to achieve compliance with new source review. Stack dispersal wil result in small ground level concentration increments from combined cycle and thermal processing sources. Heavy Metals No adverse impact will result from thermal pro- State-of-the-are particulate control with efficient cessing or landfill disposal. No significant capture of the sub-micron size fraction will be used adverse effect will result from compost use on to reduce particulate emissions and associated heavy non-food chain crops. metals to the lowest achievable levels. LACSD will con- tinue to implement industrial source control programs to reduce heavy metal concentrations. TABLE 4 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Trace Organics Thermal processing will be designed to destroy Further mitigation is not required trace organics, a beneficial impact. No signifi- cant adverse impacts will result from compost use or landfilling. Pathogens No significant adverse public health impacts will Further mitigation is not required at this time. Heat result from landfilling, composting or thermal pasteurization (an LACSD demonstration project) or other processing. suitable techniques could be used to achieve further pathogen control if deemed necessary in the future. Transportation Trucking of residuals to landfill should not aggre- If Calabasas landfill is used, CalTrans and other appro- vate congestion on major arterials. Minor problem priate agencies will review the traffic pattern during identified near Calabasas landfill if latter is used. facility design to determine if any corrective measures are required. ko Waste Disposal No significant reduction in landfill capacity is No mitigation necessary projected due to the small quantity of char/ash produced. Wastewater Treatment No significant adverse impacts will result from No mitigation necessary recycle of liquid sidestreams to the JWPCP plant due to the nature and relatively low volume of the sidestreams. Water Supply No significant adverse impact on potable water Total mitigation in plan supplies since plant effluent will be used for most water demands. Energy Beneficial impact since net energy will be pro- No mitigation necessary duced from a renewable organic resource. Public Sector Unavoidable adverse impact since a significant Local capital funding requirements can be reduced if public investment for capital and operating costs federal/state funding is obtained from one or more is required. available programs. Private Sector A beneficial impact will result from stimulation No mitigation necessary of activity in the private sector of the economy. Employment Beneficial impact from increase in employment No mitigatioon necessary during the construction phase. TABLE 4 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Short-Term Use Vs. Long-Term Alteration of visual character and potential minor Use of advanced air pollution control strategies to Productivity nuisances are the only impacts which could preclude achieve compliance with new source review and use of future beneficial use. state-of-the-art particulatecontrol will avoid long- term adverse impacts on air quality and public health w from air pollutants and heavy metals from combined o cycle and thermal processing sources. Advanced win- drow composting should significantly reduce the nui- sance potential. Irreversible Committment of Public monetary expenditures and use of nonrenew- The investment of nonrenewable resources will achieve Resources able resources such as fluidizing oil , polymers, net energy production from a renewable resource. diesel fuel, lime, and ammonia. Growth Inducing Impacts No significant growth inducing impacts will re- No mitigation necessary sult. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A land based non-thermal processing system has been selected to serve the- Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD) and other sanitation agencies within Orange County. Orange County Sanitation Districts will monitor performance of thermal processing and energy recovery systems to be constructed and operated by the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts with a view to- wards installation of a thermal processing system at some point in the future. Project Description A conceptual diagram of the selected facilities is presented in Figure 6. All sludges would be anaerobically digested at the Joint Works for gas recovery and volume reduction. Dewatered digested sludge would be truck transported to an offsite location for further processing. At the offsite location, a combination of composting and air drying will be employed to reduce water content of the sludge to 50 percent. A portion of the dried sludge would be stockpiled to be blended with incoming dewatered sludge during winter months to enable successful operation of a windrow composting system. Excess dried sludge will be truck hauled to Bee Canyon Landfill for disposal . Air dried sludge will not be recycled. Properly composted sludge will not be made available for recycling until such time as metals content of the OCSD sludges is either (1) consistent with the projected sludge characteristics contained in Chapter I of the Final EIS/EIR or (2) sufficiently low to enable recycling of sludges in conformance with applicable federal , state, and local regulations. Other than anaerobic digestion, all sludge processing will eventually be accom- plished at the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant. However, provision will be made for a 10-acre emergency composting system at the Fountain Valley Treatment Plant to serve as a backup during inclement weather and in the event that truck transport operations are disrupted. The proposed sludge management program described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan identified an offsite .processing location in the lower Round Canyon area of the Lomas de Santiago foothills. As a result of public comment on the Draft EIS/EIR, other potentially suitable locations have been identified in the upper Round Canyon area adjacent to the Bee Canyon Landfill and in the Whiting's Corner portion of the Irvine Ranch. Locations of these alternative sites is presented in Figure 7. A supplemental environmental impact statement/ report will be prepared by OCSD to provide the basis for selection of the site for the composting/air drying operation. The Supplemental EIS/EIR will consider alternative locations in (1) the upper Round Canyon Area, (2) the Whiting's Corner area of the Irvine Ranch, and (3) the lower Round Canyon site and its immediate vicinity. The Supplemental EIS/EIR will address all site related issues and may result in modification of transportation routes. Other features of the selected project description remain essentially as described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Phase III options provide identification fo currently indicated long-range alternatives. These have been defined from information available at the time of program development. It is recognized that new information may become available 31 AIR DISCHARGE WORK EXISTING IC ENGINE STEAM AND BOILER SYSTEM WAS PRIMARY RAW SLUDGE RAW DIGESTER GAS ANAEROBIC ANAEROBIC THICKENING DIGESTION DIGESTION RAW WASTE MECHANICAL TRUCK EMERGENCY ATER DEWATERING TRANSPORT ONSITE COMPOSTING I , I ------------ -� WINDROW COMPOSTING & JPL ACTS CHAR AIR DRYING TRUCK i I TRANSPORT RAW PRIMAR THERMAL SLUDGE & PROCESSING ARBON ' I = MECHANICAL AIR LANDFILL DEWATERING DEHYDRATION DISCHARGE I JPL ACTS DEMONSTRATION '------------ KEY INPUTS TO THE SYSTEM Q UNIT PROCESSES O USEFUL PRODUCTS OEND POINTS OF THE SYSTEM OVERVIEW OF FACILITIES IC-INTERNAL COMBUSTION El REQUIREMENTS WAS-WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS JPL ACTS-ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT SYSTEM REGIONAL SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOB ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA FIG. 6 32 -k Ilk /* SAND AND *GRAVEL PIT 0. -�Y 0WAD As i (o RATTLESNAKE TLESNAKE •3- wo %b RESERVOIR ;o ob q1 1-j— a BEE CANYON LANDFILL LIMITS OF FILL Pil UPPER RO N CANYON 917E .0 �t. N Rb:.IIOIR 0 r le PROPOSED RUNOFF 64 RETENTION BASIN lee.. I SAND AND NURSERY 04�1114)1 4 4 RAVEL PIT 4TOMA 0 *SPRIN LAMBERT ROUND ES.' CANYON SOUTH COAST ARTERIAL,.,,,,.. SITE 0 WHIT!N�S CORNER FIELD STATION A, DIVERSIONSIT DAM J fo 'POULTRY FARM AQ Q X,0 A r►l�RE iI ENTIAL iD AREA -1 -k- —/' CANYON o W Y' 10 L TORO MARINE CORPS 0/ AIR STATION L_(MCAS) 90 0 Id 4 c, s �D D�: �Pas'..�ca, C-Q/— �o 00. IAL FARM A/. 1p 11bo ALTERNATIVE SITE LOCATIONS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 1 2 3 4 F--j W *MAL fLUDW MANAWINNY P"00".t 0:AkQfL 19 FOR AN01 CMM T V mf fRopo t I I AN AREA FIG. 7 SCALE X 1000 FEET 33 during Phase III. On a regional basis, the Phase II facilities that will be constructed by the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts will provide information for use by OCSD. Additionally, there may be potential for further development of the JPL-ACTS process by OCSD. For the Orange County Sanitation Districts, reasonable Phase III options appear to be continuation of the Round Canyon composting/air drying facilities, or complete reliance on a thermal processing system such as dehydration/thermal processing for energy recovery or the JPL-ACTS wastewater treatment process. Economics Based on cost estimating assumptions presented in the Draft Facilities Plan, a total capital cost of $39,600,000 is estimated for the Phase II facilities, which is equivalent to $4,128,000/yr. Total annual 0 & M is estimated at $8,332,000/yr with credits for the value of fuel produced at $2,709,000/yr. The net cost, defined as annual capital plus 0 & M less credits, is about $9,751,000/yr. The latter is equivalent to about $75/dry ton of raw sludge processed through the system (based on OCSD sludge contribution only) . Annual capital and operating costs to OCSD, assuming local share of capital costs at 12.5% and 0 & M costs at 100%, is estimated at $8,848,000/yr. Based on an OCSD 1980 service area popula- tion of 1.60 million persons, the cost per person is estimated to be about $5.53/yr. This would reduce to about $5.01/yr if other Orange County Agencies contribute their share of processing costs at the off-site facility. (Capital and 0 & M cost factors are listed on page 15. ) If only OCSD sludges are processed at the off-site facility, capital costs at Round Canyon would be reduced to about $18,400,000, equivalent to an annual cost of $1,814,000/yr. 0 & M would be about $922,000/yr giving a total annual cost of $2,736,000/yr, compared to about $3,280,000/yr if other Orange County sludges are also processed. If costs for trucking and landfill disposal of the compost product are considered, the total cost increment for handling the 80 dtpd of other Orange County sludges is estimated at about $827,000/yr, equivalent to about $28/dry ton. Implementation Phase II sludge management facilities will as a minimum be sized to accommodate all sludge from primary treatment of 280 MGD of wastewater and the waste acti- vated sludge from secondary treatment of 150 MGD of primary effluent. These treatment levels are specified in the Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements submitted under Section 301(h) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Should additional secondary treatment be required, Phase II facilities will be expanded to accommodate a larger volume of waste activated sludge. Should secondary treatment of all wastewaters be required, Phase II facilities requirements will be identical to the sludge loadings des- cribed and analyzed for Phase III options and reported in the Draft EIS/EIR. The facilities schedule shown in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan has been modified to provide time for preparation of the Supplemental EIS/EIR for selection of offsite processing facilities. A revised facilities schedule is provided in Figure 8. The schedule is predicated upon State and Federal approv- 34 PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III FACILITIES PLAN PROJECT REPORT IN 11111 11111 Thill 111111 ROUND CANYON FACILITIES JPL ACTS DEMO PHASE III ............... FACILITIES 1979 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 KEY �. _I RournE orr:RAI R>Ra ]rt[AQUIOrt.7R -UCEgR aoRs,Ruc pR ( 1 FACILITIES SCHEDULE O.ERATE AMU EYALUAI{ u O ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT$ f urE.E.A...Ra.A{s O .a.....,..,.......„,.......= ...... FIG. 8 nrtuE 0}ARl uR al of the final EIS/EIR by the end of 1980 and initiation of preparation of the Supplemental EIS/EIR in the last quarter of calendar year 1980. After completion of the Supplemental EIS/EIR, site acquisition and design could proceed concur- rently provided that access for detailed topographic surveys, and engineering and geologic work could be obtained. Other features of the facilities schedule would be the same as described in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Facilities planning and design principles identified in the Draft EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan remain essentially unchanged. Key principles are sum- marized as follows: System Reliability: A high level of reliability and flexibility will be in- corporated in the design by providing standby capacity for key unit processes , a high level of intermediate storage, and conservative design principles to allow operational flexibility. Air Pollution Controls: Advanced air pollution control systems will be applied to the JPL-ACTS demonstration facility and to other thermal processing systems which may be installed for sludge processing in the future. All emission sour- ces will comply with the rules and regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . 35 l Nuisance Controls: A conservative design approach will be used to assure that odors, dust, noise, or other nuisance conditions resulting from operation of Phase II facilities are not transported beyond the treatment plant boundaries or, in the case of offsite facilities, are minimized to the maximum extent prac- ticable. Administrative actions related to the preparation of supplemental project re- ports, permit acquisition, operator recruitment and contractual arrangements are described in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. In addition, Orange County Sanitation Districts will include in applications for Step I funding assistance, a request for those funds necessary to complete the Supplemental EIS/EIR for selection of the offsite processing location.- Policy actions relating to industrial source control and public participation will be undertaken as described in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facilities Plan. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures A summary of environmental impacts projected to result from the selected project is presented in Table 5. Also shown are mitigation measures that have been included in the selected project as a result of public review of the Draft EIS/ EIR. The impacts shown are those which will result from the selected project after incorporation of the added mitigation measures. As a result of public comment on the Draft EIS/EIR additional potentially suitable locations for the air drying/composting operation have been identified. A supplemental EIS/EIR will be prepared to provide the basis for selection of the site for the sludge processing facilities. As indicated in Table 5 many of the environmental considerations will be addressed in the Supplemental EIS/EIR and impacts and mitigation measures associated with the selected site will be defined. Digester gas produced by Phase II sludge processing facilities will be combusted at the treatment plants in existing internal combustion engines. Since these engines are not included in facilities in the selected project, impacts asso- ciated with their use are not a direct result of the selected project. RESEARCH AND CONTINUING PLANNING Research studies were identified during the course of development of the selec- ted sludge management program to improve the state of knowledge and provide flexibility for decision making at the end of Phase II. Studies have been identified with regard to (1) potential for using the sanitary landfill as an energy source, (2) detailed monitoring of Phase II facilities, (3) further examination of environmental consequences of low levels of toxicant emissions, (4) opportunities for segregation of sludges in the sewerage system, (5) effi- ciency of industrial source control programs, and (6) regional examination of liquid waste disposal needs. Public review and comment resulted in the identification of needed research on sludge disposal in deep ocean basins. A demonstration study involving detailed 36 pre-discharge and post-discharge evaluations was suggested. This need together with those identified above consitute the complete list of research needs iden- tified by the Final EIS/EIR. Provisions for compliance with requirements Section 208 and responsibility for continuing program update were described in the Final EIS/EIR and Draft Facili- ties Plan and have not changed. Such provisions will be used to achieve Section 208 compliance and to establish responsibility for continuing program update. Orange County Sanitation Districts currently air dry dewatered sludge at the Coyote Canyon landfill. Transfer of landfill operations from Coyote Canyon to the new Bee Canyon landfill necessitate relocation of this operation to a new site to be determined by the Supplemental EISIEIR.Im- provements to the operation will include addition of advanced windrow composting and utilization of larger windrows and turning devices.Sludge will be landfilled until sludge quality is improved.The new facility will be designed to serve all sanitation agencies in Orange County. 37 TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Geohydrology and Water Quality No adverse impact on surface or groundwater quality Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location. at treatment plants. Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location. Air Quality Increased emissions from combustion of greater Advanced air pollution control systems will be used on amount of digester gas in existing internal combus- the JPL-ACTS Demonstration to achieve compliance with tion engines. Emissions from mobile sources and South Coast Air Quality Management District rules. JPL-ACTS Demonstration. Terrestrial Biota No adverse impact at treatment plants since no Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location viable natural community, no rare or endangered species or migratory birds are contained within the plant sites. Archaeological Sites No adverse impact at treatment plants since field Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location surveys have determined that none were present. Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location. w Land Use No adverse impact at treatment plants. Supplemen- Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location 00 tal EIS/EIR for offsite location. Visual Character No adverse impact at treatment plants. Supplemen- Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location tal EIS/EIR for offsite location. Nuisances No adverse impact at treatment plants. Supplemen- Facilities design will incorporate systems to assure tal EIS/EIR for offsite location. that nuisance conditions will not result beyond treat- ment plant boundaries. Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location. Air Pollutants Health concerns exist with regard to emissions from Advanced air pollution control systems will be used internal combustion engines at the treatment plants. on the JPL-ACTS and other thermal systems that may be No significant health risk from other emission installed in the future. sources. Heavy Metals No adverse public health impact. Landfill provides for containment. State-of-the-art particulate controls will be used on thermal process- ing systems. Aggresive pursuit of industrial pre- treatment. Trace Organics No adverse public health impact. Landfill provides for containment. Thermal process- destroys trace organics. Pathogens No adverse public health impact. Supplemental Landfill provides for containment. Proper composting EIS/EIR for offsite location. provides destruction. A system of truck covers will be considered to minimize accidental spillage events. Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location. TABLE 5 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED IN SELECTED PHASE II FACILITIES FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IMPACT MITIGATION Transportation No aggravation of congestion and/or vehicular con- Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location flicts on major arterials. Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location. Waste Disposal System No significant reduction in landfill capacity. Supplemental EIS/EIR for offsite location Wastewater Treatment System No adverse impact from liquid sidestream recycle due to nature and low volume of the sidestreams. Water Supply System No adverse impact on potable water supplies at SUDDlemental EIS/EIR for offsite location treatment olants since secondary effluent is to be used to meet sludge processing needs. Supple- mental EIS/EIR for offsite location. Energy Systems Recovery of energy by use of digester gas is bene- ficial. Additional electrical energy will be needed for sludge processing. Fuels for trucking operations and composting operations will be needed. Public Sector Unavoidable adverse impact since a significant public Local capital funding requirements can be reduced if investment for capital and operating costs is re- federal/state grant assistance is obtained. quired, Private Sector Moderately significant regional benefits due to stimulation of economic activity. Employment Regionally significant increase in employment opportunities during construction. Short-Term Use Vs. Long-Term Potential for preclusion of beneficial uses at off- Landfilling of dried sludge minimizes public health site location to be examined in Supplemental EIS/ implications associated with heavy metals and trace EIR. No preclusion of beneficial uses at treat- orqanics. ment plants. Irreversible Commitment of Public monetary expenditures, use of nonrenewable Resources resources such as polymer for dewatering and diesel fuel for composting and trucking operations. Loss of biotic resources at the offsite location may occur and will be addressed in Supplemental EIS/EIR. Growth Inducing Impacts No significant growth inducing impacts. i AVAILABILITY OF LA/OMA PROJECT PUBLICATIONS The following LA/OMA Project reports are available at the libraries listed at the conclusion of this section: Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area, October 1980, and appendices thereto. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange Count Metropolitan Area, April 1980, and appendices thereto. Draft Facilities Plan/Program, Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area, April 1980, and appendices thereto. Carver-Greenfield Process Evaluation, A Process for Sludge Drying, December, 1978. Marketing Programs Designed for Sludge Management, August, 1979. Sludge Exportation Study, August, 1978. Initial Analysis of Candidate Systems and Preliminary Site Identification, April , 1977. Sludge Processing and Disposal , A State of the Art Review, April , 1977. Phase I Report, August, 1976. Other LA/OMA Project publications are available prior to January 1, 1981 by writing to: LA/OMA Project P.O. Box 4998 1955 Workman Mill Road Whittier, CA 90607 After January 1, 1981, requests for information on the LA/OMA Project and for LA/OMA Project reports should be directed to the individual operating agencies at the addresses identified in the abstract at the front of this document. 40 LIBRARIES RECEIVING LA/OMA PROJECT PUBLICATIONS Alhambra Public Library Commerce Library 410 W. Main St. 5655 Jillson St. Alhambra, CA 91801 Commerce, CA 90040 Chaffee College Library Sherman Foundation Library 5885 Hauen Ave. 614 Dahlia Ave. Alta Loma, CA 91701 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Anaheim Public Library Orange Coast College Library 500 W. Broadway 2701 Fairview Road Anaheim, CA 92805 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Arcadia Public Library Covina Library 20 W. Duarte Rd. 234 N. Second Ave. Arcadia, CA 91006 Covina, CA 91723 L.A. County Aboretum Library Cypress College Library 301 N. Baldwin Ave. 9200 Valley View St. Arcadia, CA 91006 Cypress, CA 90673 Citrus College Library California State University Library 18824 E. Foothill Blvd. 1000 E. Victoria St. Azusa, CA 91702 Dominguez Hills, CA 90247 Water Resources Center Archives Downey Library Room 40, North Gate Hall 8400 Third Street University of California Downey, CA 90241 Berkeley, CA 94720 Beverly Hills Library El Segundo Library 444 N. Rexford Dr. 111 W. Mariposa Ave. Beverly Hills, CA 90210 El Segundo, CA 90245 Buena Park Library Orange County Library 7150 La Palma Ave. 17565 Los Alamos Buena Park, CA 90620 Fountain Vllaey, CA 92708 Burbank Public Library Fullerton Library 110 N. Glenoaks Blvd. 353 W. Commonwealth Burbank, CA 91503 Fullerton, CA 92632 L.A. County Library Cal-State University Library 150 E. 216th St. 800 N. State College Drive Carson, CA 90745 Fullerton, CA 92634 Cerritos Library Orange County Library 10825 Bloomfield Ave. 11200 Stanford Cerritos, CA 90701 Garden Grove , CA 92640 41 f i } i i Claremont College Libraries City of Glendale Library Dist. 900 N. Dartmouth St. 222 E. Harvard St. Claremont, CA 91711 Glendale, CA 91205 Glendora Library Orange County Library 140 S. Glendora Ave. 7842 Walker St. Glendora, CA 91740 La Palma, CA 90620 L.A. County Library Cal State University Library 12700 N. Grevillea Ave. 6101 E. Seventh St. Hawthorne, CA 90250 Long Beach, CA 90840 Huntington Beach Library Long Beach Public Library 525 Main St. 101 Pacific Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Long Beach, CA 90802 L.A. County Library Cal State University Library 6518 Miles Ave. 5151 State University Drive Huntington Park, CA 90255 Los Angeles, CA 90032 Inglewood Library USC Library 101 W. Manchester Blvd. University Park Inglewood, CA 90301 Los Angeles, CA 90007 Government Publications Dept. Arch. & Urban Planning Library, UCLA Main Library, University of Calif. 405 Hilgard Ave. Campus Drive Los Angeles, CA 90024 Irvine, CA 92713 Newport-Irvine Waste Management Los Angeles Public Library Planning Agency - Library 630 W. Fifth Street 4920 Campus Drive Los Angeles, CA 90017 ' Irvine, CA 92713 1 Orange Co. Library L.A. Municipal Reference Library ' Civic Center Room 530, City Hall East La Habra, CA 90631 200 N. Main St. La Habra, CA 90631 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Orange Co. Library USC - Seaver Science Library 363 Glenneyre 920 W. 29th Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Los Angeles, CA 90007 Leisure World-Laguna Hills Library L.A. County Dept. Community Development 23532 Valencia 2999 W. 6th St. Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Los Angeles, CA 90020 Orange Co. Library Cal State University Library 33841 Niguel Rd. 5151 State University Drive Laguna Niguel , CA 92677 Los Angeles, CA 90032 42 Antelope Valley College Library L.A. Planning Library 3041 West Avenue K 618 City Hall Lancaster, CA 93534 Los Angeles, CA 90012 L.A. County Library Environmental Protection Agency 44833 N. Fig Ave. L.A. Contact Office Lancaster, CA 93534 300 N. Los Angeles St. , Rm. 2037 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Regional Library Councils Placentia Library Dist. 964 Hall of Records 411 E. Chapman Ave. 320 W. Temple St. Placentia, CA 92670 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Hughes Research Library Cal State Polytechnic University Library 3011 Malibu Canyon Rd. 3801 W. Temple Ave. Malibu, CA 90265 Pomona, CA S-1768 Pepperdine University Library Pomona Public Library 25255 Pacific Coast Highway 625 S. Garvey Ave. Malibu, CA 90265 Pomona, CA 91766 Orange County Library Riverside City Central Library 24851 Chrisanta Drive 3581 Seventh St. Mission Viejo, CA 92675 Riverside, CA 92501 Monrovia Library Co. of Riverside Planning Dept. 321 S. Myrtle Ave. 4080 Lemon St. Monrovia, CA 91016 Riverside, CA 92501 Newport Beach Library Government Publications Dept. 2005 Dover Drive University of California Library Newport Beach, CA 92660 Canyon Crest Road Riverside, CA 92507 Cal State University Library University of California 18111 Nordhoff St. Offices of Educational Services Northridge, CA. Statewide Air Pollution Resource Center 900 University Ave. Riverside, CA 92502 L.A. County Library Office of Appropriate Technology South East Regional Headquarters 1530 10th St. 12348 E. Imperial Highway Sacramento, CA 95814 Norwalk, CA 90650 Norwalk Library County San Bernardino Planning Dept. 12350 E. Imperial Highway 316 Mt. View Ave. Norwalk, CA 90650 San Bernardino, CA 92415 43 Orange Co. Public Library San Bernardino Association Governments 431 City Drive, South 334 W. 3rd St. Orange, CA 92668 San Bernardino, CA 92401 Orange Public Library Orange County Library 101 N. Center St. 233 Granada St. Orange, CA 92666 San Clemente, CA 92672 Pasadena Public Library Environmental Protection Agency 285 E. Walnut St. Region IX Library Pasadena, CA 91101 213 Fremont St. San Francisco, CA 94111 Environmental Engineering Library Orange County Library (138-78) 31882 Camino Capistrano 136 Wm. Kech Lab San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Cal Tech Pasadena, CA 91125 San Marino Public Library Tustin Branch Library 1890 Huntington Drive Centennial at Main San Marino, CA 91108 Tustin, CA 92680 Santa Ana Public Library Los Angeles Valley College Library 26 Civic Center Plaza 5800 Fulton Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92701 Van Nuys, CA 91401 County of Orange Pacific Bio-Marine Library Environmental Management Agency 4134 Del Rey 400 Civic Center Drive, West Venice, CA 90291 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Santa Monica Public Library Orange Co. Library 1343 Sixth St. 17865 Santiago Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90401 Villa Park, CA 92667 Orange County Library Freedom of Information 2300 Beverly Manor Rd. EPA Seal Beach, CA 90740 Room 329 401 "M" Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Signal Hill Public Library L.A. County Library 2175 Cherry Ave. 1601 W. Covina Parkway Signal Hill , CA 90806 West Covina, CA 91790 Orange County Library Bonnie Bell Wardman Library 28192 Silverado Canyon Blvd. Whittier College Silverado, CA 92676 7031 Founders Hill Rd. Whittier, CA 90608 44 South Pasadena Public Library Whittier Public Library 1115 E. Centro St. 7344 Washington Ave. South Pasadena, CA 91030 Whittier, CA 90602 Orange County Library Los Angeles Harbor College LIbrary 79232 Cerritos 111 Figueroa Place Stanton, CA 90680 Wilmington, CA 90744 Torrance Public Library Los Angeles Pierce College Library 3301 Torrance Blvd. 6201 Winnetka Ave. Torrance, CA 90503 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Honnold Library Claremont, CA 91711 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE Major publications of the LA/OMA Project are entered into the National Tech- nical Information Service of the U.S. Department of Commerce. To date, the following documents have been entered into the NTIS system: Title Accession No. Marketing Programs Designed for Sludge Management (August 1979) PB80124860 Carver Greenfield Process Evaluation -- A Process for Sludge Drying (December 1978) PB296508/AS Sludge Exportation Study (August 1978) PB296452/AS Assessment of Alternative Strategies for Sludge PB80192990 Disposal into Deep Basins off Southern California (September 1979) The following documents will be entered into the NTIS system prior to com- pletion of the LA/OMA Project: • Sludge Processing and Disposal -- A State of the Art Review (April 1977) 0 Initial Analysis of Candidate Systems and Prelinimary Site Identification (April 1977) • EIS/EIR DRAFT and Appendices -- Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (April 1980) 45 • Draft Facilities Plan/Program -- Proposed Sludge Management Program .for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (April 1980) • Final EIS/EIR -- Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (October 1980) • Final Facilities Plan/Program and Summary of Final EIS/EIR -- Proposed Sludge Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (October 1980) Copies of reports may be obtained from NTIS by contacting: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 i t 1 i 46 all,