Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-05-11 „tT�TlO. d� ' �! TELEPHONES: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORINTT A 962-2411 G3 lr P. ❑. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FRE May 2 , 198 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 11 WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, i983 - 7 :30 P.M. 10844 ELLIs AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ... The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 and 11 of Orange Count_, California, will be held at the above hour and date . �d J., _ Secretary Scneduled Upcoming Meetirigs : FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 19th , at 4 : 30 p.m EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 1st, at 5: 30 p.m. ADJOURNED JOINT BOARD MTG. - Wednesday, June 1st, at 7 : 30 p.m. re adoption of industrial Waste Ordinances JOINT MEETING OF: SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO STUDY) REORGANIZATION OF TTHE ) - Wednesday, June 8th, at 5 : 00 p.m. SANITATION DISTRICTS ) (immediately preceding_ the regular & ) Joint Board Meeting) FISCAL POLICY 'COMMITTEE ) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings May May 11, 1983 Jun 1, 1983 (Changed from 5/25) June Jun 1, 1983 & Jun 29, 1983 (Changed from 6/22) Jun 8, 1983 July Jul 13, 1983 Jul 27, 1983 August Aug 10, 1983 None Scheduled September Sep 14, 1983 Sep 28, 1983 October Oct 12, 1983 Oct 26, 1983 November Nov 9, 1983 Nov 23, 1983 December Dec 14, 1983 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1984 Jan 25, 1984 February Feb 8, 1984 Feb 22, 1984 March Mar 8, 1984 Mar 22, 1984 April Apr 11, 1984 Apr 25, 1984 May May 9, 1984 May 23, 1984 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: `wo, JOINT BOARDSArea � ;14 540-2910 IAGENDA MEETING DATE MAY 11, 1983' - 7:30 P.M'. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI H AD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT :015 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT - - ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District l - April 13, 1983, regular District 2 - April 13, 1983, regular 'District 3 - April 13, 1983, regular District 5 - April 13, 1983, regular District 6 - April 13, ig'83, regular District 7 - April 13, 1983, regular District 11 - April 13, 1983, regular (6) EACH DISTRICT Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem of the Boards: (a) District 1 (b) District 2 (c) District 3 (d) District 5 (e) District 6 (f) District 7 -(g) District 11 (7) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (8) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) "A" and "B" 4 06 83 4 20 83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 283,364.70 $ 188,149.44 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 148,648.61 113,633.08 Joint Working Capital Fund - 65,894.84 55,452.07 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,107.87 5,583.33 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,113.51 5,808.51 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 1,536.19 12,346.75 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 21,351.70 3,301.65 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 158.74 1,759.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 8,231.24 3,844.04 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 256,779.72 11,344.35 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 2,368.22 2,639.40 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 4,567.12 3,535.70 $ 807,122.46 $ 407,397.32 - - - - CONSENT CALENDAR ------ - -- — - - �...� ITEMS NOS. 10(a) THROUGH 10(r) (10) ALL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not: specifically removed from same. 5/11/83 (10) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, authorizing an addition of $3,973.00 to the contract with Hoagland-Artukovich, a Joint Venture, for installation of steam traps at all steamer connections, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for due to inclement weather conditions between February, 1982 and March, 1983. See page "C" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-53, approving plans and specifications for purchase of Six (6) Standard Samplers for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 6/21/83) See page "D" (c) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 12441 to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $14,710.00 for emergency repair of frozen plug valve on aeration basin drain line at Plant No. 1. See page "E" (d) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Associatin of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) for the period May 1, 1983 through April 30, 1984, and approving payment of annual dues in the amount of $8,000.00 (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend the American Society of Civil Engineers' Spring Convention on May 15-19, 1983, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Chief of Procurement to attend the 68th Annual International Purchasing Conference on May 22-25, 1983, in Las Vegas, Nevada; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with Rehabilitation of Domes and Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters C & D and E & H at Plant No. 2, and Rehabilitation of Domes and Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters 5 & 6 at Plant No. 1 (h) (1) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers re preliminary design (Phase 1) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20. See page "F" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-54, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase 1) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, for a fixed fee plus reimbursement of actual indirect costs and direct labor costs, including eligible overhead, on a per diem fee basis, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $342,455.00. See page "G" (Item 10(h) continued on page 4) -3- 5/11/S3 (10) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (2) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers re preliminary design (Phase 1) of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15. See page "H" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-55, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase 1) of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, for a fixed fee plus reimbursement of actual indirect costs and direct labor costs, including eligible overhead, on a per diem fee basis, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $276,094.00 See page "I" (i) Consideration of motion declaring L & H Construction Co., a Joint Venture, in default and breach of the contract for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, and approving selection of a contractor for final performance of the job by the surety company. See page "J" (j) Consideration of motion approving participation in California Cooperative Outfall Monitoring Project (Cal COMP) feasibility study, and authorizing procurement of laboratory and other equipment and supplies in a total amount not to exceed $20,000 necessary to conduct and participate in said study DISTRICT 2 (k) Consideration of motion__authorizing the Selection Committee to b.d negotiate with Lowry & Associates for design of the following projects: (a) Fullerton-Brea Purchase Relief Trunk (b) Euclid Relief Trunk (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-59-2, ordering annexation of .51 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the city of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "K" DISTRICT 3 (m) (1) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, in Katella Avenue from Western to Knott. See page "L" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-60-3, approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, in Katella Avenue from Western to Knott, for a lump sum fee of $35,000.00. See page "M" (Item 10(m) continued on page 5) -4- 5/11/83 (10) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (m) (2) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western `..✓ Relief Trunk Sewer, in Lampson Avenue from Western to Knott. See page "N" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-61-3, approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, in Lampson Avenue from Western to Knott, for a lump sum fee of $22,000.00. See page "0" (3) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Lowry & Associates for design of Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer. See page "P" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-62-3, approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $25,000.00. See page DISTRICT 5 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-63-5,authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to The Irvine Company relative to abandonment of the Jamboree Road Pump Station, at no cost to The Irvine Company. See page "R" DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim submitted by Wilbern L. Bradley in the amount of $1,340.94 for damages allegedly caused by a sewage backup, and refer to the Districts' liability claims admininstrator and General Counsel for appropriate action (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-64-7, waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected agencies re Annexation No. 115 - K-P-S Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. See page "S" (q) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Donald Sodaro requesting annexation of 1.58 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Randall Street in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 117 - Sodaro Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (Pursuant to a Letter of Understanding between the District and the City, the City of Orange will be the local sewering entity.) See page "T" -5- 5/11/83 (10) DISTRICT 11 (r) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 27, 1983, re Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3 (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3 authorizing an addition of $80,483.58 to the contract with Bubalo Construction Company for extra work due to discovery of nearly 200 undisclosed oil field utilities and repair of additional undisclosed electrical conduit for the City of Huntington Beach's street lights, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page mum END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (12) ALL DISTRICTS 5/11/83 Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-56, approving membership in the Southern California Energy Coalition re Districts' participation in their electric load managment program at Plant No. 2; and authorizing execution of necessary documents in form approved by the General Counsel, and payment in the amount of $13,251.96 for implementation costs, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. See page "V" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-57, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1983 summer work program for painting and grounds maintenance work, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. See page "W" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to participate as a member of a special wastewater technology delegation to a technical program in the Peoples' Republic of China, sponsored by People to People International, to be held September 12 through October 3, 1983; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith. See page "X" (14) EACH DISTRICT Hearing re proposed revisions to Uniform Ordinances Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (a) Open hearing (b) Report of staff (c) Introduction of Ordinance No. , an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, by title only, as follows: District No. Ordinance No. Repealing Ordinance No(s) . 1 104 103 2 205 204 3 306 305 5 514 508 & 510 6 606 603 & 605 7 718 716 & 717 11 1106 1103 & 1105 and consideration of motion by the respective District waiving reading of its entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) (d) Comments by general public, if any (1) Receive and file written comments, if any (2) Oral comments, if any (e) Consideration of incorporating final suggestions and other changes in wording of staff, general public and Directors, as the Boards may direct `00� (f) Close hearing (g) Declaring intent to adopt the respective ordinances at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative office -7- (15) ALL DISTRICTS 5/11/83 (a) Verbal staff report re completion of Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6 (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-58, accepting Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, as complete See page "Y" (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 (19) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 (25) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 (27) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 (29) DISTRICT 6 Verbal status report re implementation of proposed user fee program (30) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983 -8- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Box 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 JOINT BOARDS 962-24111 Meeting Date May 11 , 1983 - 7 : 30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting . To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager ' s Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself , particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer ' s estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award . ALL DISTRICTS No. 6: Annual Election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem of each District . In accordance with the Districts ' standard procedures (,see following excerpt) , a Chairman for each District Board is elected annually at the May meeting . The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman are elected in July, following nominations at the June meeting . Excerpt from Rules of Procedure for Meetings 7. Chairman of the District - A Chairman ( and Chairman pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the members of each District Board of Directors at the first meeting in May of each year, and said Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members . For the information of the new Directors , the Districts ' regulations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a -1- 5/11/83 member of the Executive Committee which ordinarily meets monthly at the call of the Joint Chairman . This Committee also includes the Joint Chairman , Vice Joint Chairman and a representative of the County Board of Supervisors . The Executive Committee ' s function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards concerning Joint Districts matters , such as budgets , salaries , personnel , policies . etc . Current Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem District No. Chairman Chairman pro tem 1 Robert Hanson Robert Luxembourger 2 Henry Wedaa Don Roth 3 Bruce Finlayson Frank Laszlo 5 Evelyn Hart Philip Maurer 6 Elvin Hutchison Ruthelyn Plummer 7 Richard Edgar Don Smith 11 Ruth Bailey Harriett Wieder No . 10 ( a) : Change Order No. 6 to Job No. P2-25-1A, Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins ) . Change Order No . 6 adds $3 , 973 . 00 and 39 calendar days to the contract. The added work item is for the installation of steam traps at all steamer connections to remove condensate from the low points in the piping system. The 39-day time extension is for inclement weather and resulting poor site conditions for the period February 1 , 1982 to March 24, 1983 . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 in the amount of $3 , 973 . 00 and the 39-calendar-day time extension for inclement weather . No. 10 (b) : Approval of Plans and Specifications for Purchase of Six Standard Samplers for Plants No. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133 . Last year , we developed a prototype for a standardized sampler that would provide us with reliable influent and effluent metering . This equipment is very important to our self-monitoring program that assists us in complying with NPDES sampling and -2- 5/11/83 reporting requirements . Three samplers are necessary at each Plant to enable the accurate monitoring needed to maintain process control . The estimated cost is $90 , 000 for the six units . The staff recommends approval of Specification No. E-133 and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date ( tentatively June 21st) . Upon receipt of bids , a purchase recommendation will be submitted to the Boards for consideration . No. 10 (c) : Ratifying Emergency Purchase Order to Advanco Constructors for Valve Repairs . Recently a plug valve on the aeration basin drain line for the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 failed . Informal repair bids were solicited from contractors already working on site . These quotes ranged from a high of $20 , 300 to Advanco' s low bid of $14, 710 . In order to rectify the emergency situation , the staff then issued a purchase order to Advanco Constructors , Inc . in the amount of $14, 710 pursuant to the emergency provisions of the Boards ' purchasing policy. The staff is requesting ratification of the action taken to correct this situation . No . 10 (d) : Renewal of Membership in the Conference of Coastal Agencies . In May 1981 , the Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) was formed as a Committee of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) . The Committee ' s function is to work with the Congress and Environmental Protection Agency to insure that ocean disposal of wastewater residuals remains a viable disposal alternative . In recent years , numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives have been proposed which would ban ocean disposal regardless of land or air-based environmental constraints . Your General Manager is currently Chairman of CCA' s Executive Committee . We recommend approval of the $8 , 000 annual membership fee for 1983-84. No. 10 ( e) : Authorization for One Staff Member to Attend American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Spring Convention . The ASCE Spring Convention will be held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on May 15-19. On the program is a variety of topics that are of interest to the Districts , including : Construction Management Case Studies ; Urban Water Problems ; -3- 5/11/83 Hazardous Wastes Regulations and Technologies ; Innovative and Alternative Systems on Water Pollution ; and Waste Utilization . The staff is requesting authority to send one member to this conference and approval for reimbursement of all associated expenses in accordance with established policy. No . 10 ( f ) : Authorization for the Chief of Procurement to Attend the 68th Annual International Purchasing Conference. The Annual Conference of the National Association of Purchasing Management will be held in Las Vegas , Nevada, on May 22-25 . The program includes such topics as Strategic Procurement Planning ; Conflict Management in Purchasing ; Purchasing and the Law; Computer Application in Materials Management; and a round- table discussion of current problems faced by State, County and Local Government buyers . We feel participation by our Chief of Procurement would be very beneficial to the Districts and the staff is requesting approval to send him to this Conference, and authorization for reimbursement of all associated expenses in accordance with established policy. No. 10 (g) : Authorize Staff to Solicit Proposals for Engineering Services in connection with Rehabilitation of Digester Domes and Sludge Pump Mixing Systems . Two digesters at Plant No. 1 and four digesters at Plant No. 2 are in need of rehabilitation . The proposed work includes installation of high velocity pump-mixing systems on all six digesters , similar to those installed under recent contracts for new digesters which have proved to be highly successful in minimizing scum build-up. Casting of new steel and gunite domes over the severely cracked existing domes on Digesters C & D at Plant No. 2 and Digester 5 at Plant No. 1 and the sealing of annular spaces to avoid odorous gas escaping on steel domed Digesters E & H at Plant No. 2 and Digester 6 at Plant No. 1 are also included in the scope of work . Staff requests authority to solicit proposals for the engineering services needed to design this work . No. 10 (h) : Receive and File Selection Committee Certification and Award of Engineering Services Agreements . At the December meeting , the Boards authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design services for two master plan facilities : Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Ocean Outfall Booster Station No. C at Plant No. 2. The Selection Committee has met on three occasions to -4- 5/11/83 consider engineering services for this work and the following are its recommendations : That two separate engineering contracts be issued to John Carollo Engineers , one for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 ( estimated construction cost $17 , 300 , 000 ) and one for Ocean Outfall Booster Station No. C at Plant No. 2 ( estimated construction cost $32 , 100 , 000 ) . That each contract be divided into four phases ; Phase 1 , Preliminary Design ; Phase 2, Design of Final Plans and Specifications ; Phase 3 , Construction Consultation ; and Phase 4, Operations and Maintenance Manual and Training of Districts ' Personnel . That the consulting engineer be engaged to proceed with Phase 1 , preliminary design , at this time, and that fees for the remaining phases be negotiated upon completion of the Phase 1 work . The Selection Committee has negotiated what it considers a reasonable fee for the Phase 1 preliminary design work as follows : low Item Headworks 2 Booster "C" Total Fixed fee $ 36 , 000 $ 29 , 000 $ 65 , 000 Indirect costs (maximum) 5, 200 4, 200 9, 400 Direct services at per diem rates , including eligible overhead (maximum) 301 , 255 242 , 894 544, 149 Totals $342, 455 $276 , 094 $618 , 549 The Districts will receive a credit of up to 80% of the above fees against the Phase 2 design work . The items appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certifications of the final negotiated fees for the above Phase 1 work and adoption of resolutions approving separate agreements for said services for each project. Copies of the certifications and resolutions are attached with the supporting agenda material . No. 10 ( i) : Action re Default of Contractor for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098 . In November, L & H Construction Company was awarded a contract -5- 5/11/83 in the amount of $129 , 718 for miscellaneous paving at Treatment Plant No. 2. The work is not yet complete and the contractor is financially insolvent . The Districts are, therefore, looking to Fremont Indemnity Company, who issued the performance bond, to complete the work in accordance with the specifications . The action appearing on the agenda is to declare L & H Construction Company in default and breach of their contract and to approve the selection of Columbia Paving as the surety 's contractor for completion of the job . A memorandum from the General Counsel regarding this item is included with your agenda documents . No. 10 ( j ) : Approval of Participation in Proposed California Cooperative Outfall Monitoring Project (Cal COMP) Feasibility Study. The State Water Resources Control Board has proposed that several ocean dischargers , including our Districts , participate in a study to assess the feasibility of using caged mussels to monitor impacts of municipal ocean discharges on the marine environment . The State of California has been conducting studies since the mid-70 ' s commonly called "mussel watch" to determine if environmental toxicants can be effectively monitored by studying the amount of toxicants in the mussels . These studies are conducted on mussels normally found around piers and rock outcroppings along the California coast . However, no methods have been developed to use caged mussels in deep ocean waters around municipal outfalls . Despite this , the EPA has written requirements in our pending 301 ( h) waiver permit to make this a standard monitoring practice. This cooperative study is a cost effective way of pooling the efforts of several agencies to develop these techniques . The State proposal consists of a 12-month study using caged mussels at the Los Angeles County Sanitation District and the City of San Diego outfalls to develop anchoring, retrieval and toxicant analysis techniques . Our Districts participation would include up to $20 , 000 for purchase of laboratory equipment, special buoys and radio markers and approximately six days per month of one of our laboratory technician ' s time in performing analyses . We anticipate that implementation of the required full-scale monitoring program will be postponed pending the results of this study. The staff recommends the Board authorize expenditures up to $20 , 000 to cover our participation in the cost of equipment purchases . Additional laboratory staff is not required . -6- r„ 5/11/83 DISTRICT NO. 2 No. 10 (k) : Authorizing Selection Committee to Negotiate with Lowry & Associates for Design of Certain Master Plan Projects . The action appearing on your agenda is to authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate fees for design of two of the recommended projects in the District ' s recently updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers . These are the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk and the Euclid Relief Trunk . The existing sewers have reached capacity and the projects are necessary to relieve the overloaded conditions and to take care of the growth anticipated by the municipal master plans for the drainage area. The staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a fee with Lowry & Associates for this work . When an agreement has been reached , the Committee will submit its recommendation to the Board for approval . No. 10 ( 1 ) : Ordering Annexation No. 43 , Forrester Annexation . The staff is recommending that Annexation No. 43, Forrester Annexation , be ordered . The . 51-acre annexation is for a single family dwellling in the vicintiy of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. The local sewering agency will be the City of Anaheim. All applicable fees have been paid and pursuant to the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties , the District will receive a one-time $500 allocation from the County ' s Special District Augmentation Fund in lieu of a tax allocation for this property. DISTRICT NO. 3 No. 10 (m) : Approval of Selection Committee Certifications and Award of Agreements to Lowry & Associates for Design of Master Plan Sewers . At the April meeting , the Board authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate for engineering services for the design of three master plan facilities . These three sewers will relieve the existing Hoover Western Trunk which is overloaded . The Selection Committee has met and the following are their recommendations : ( 1) Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer ( in Katella from Western to Knott) . -7- r' ^ 5/11/83 This project is to be constructed in Katella Avenue between the Knott Interceptor and the upstream terminus of the Hoover Western Subtrunk at Western Avenue. The preliminary construction cost estimate is $800 , 000 . A lump sum design fee of $35 , 000 was negotiated . ( 2) Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer ( in Lampson from Western to Knott) . This project is also designed to relieve the Hoover Western Relief Trunk by diverting flow to the Knott Interceptor which has adequate capacity. The preliminary construction cost estimate is $500 , 000 . A lump sum design fee of $22 , 000 has been negotiated . ( 3) Orange Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer . This project is the construction of a relief sewer in Crescent Avenue to again relieve the overloaded Hoover Western Relief Subtrunk to the Knott Interceptor . The estimated construction cost is $520 , 000 . A lump sum design fee of $25 , 000 was negotiated . The items appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certifications of the final negotiated fees for the above work and adoption of resolutions approving separate agreements for said services for each project. Copies of the certifications and resolutions are attached with the sup- porting agenda material . DISTRICT NO. 5 No. 10 (n) : Approving Quitclaim Deed to The Irvine Company Relative to the Jamboree Pump Station. With the completion of the new Back Bay Trunk Sewer last year , the Jamboree Pump Station is no longer needed . However, pursuant to our Coastal Commission permit for the trunk sewer, the District was required to keep the pump station in service for standby purposes for a period of one year . The year has now elapsed and we are in the process of dismantling the pump station in preparation for abandonment . The pump station site is located in an easement granted to the District in 1967 by the Irvine Company. Since we no longer require the easement, staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 83-63-5 which quitclaims the property back to the Irvine Company at no cost. -8- 5/11/83 NOW DISTRICT NO. 7 No. 10 (o) : Receive, File and Deny Claim for Alleged Damages . Mr . Wilbern L. Bradley, who resides at 13981 Hewes Avenue, Santa Ana, has filed a claim in the amount of $1, 340 . 94 for damages allegedly resulting from a sewer backup during the intense rainstorm on March lst. Staff recommends the claim be routinely denied and referred to the Districts ' Liability Claims Administrator and the General Counsel for appropriate action . No. 10 (p) : Waiving Property Tax Allocation re Annexation No. 115, K-P-S Annexation . Proceedings for the 3 . 15 acre parcel in the vicinity of Orange Park Acres Boulevard and Frank Street were initiated in September 1982. The annexation includes connection of three single family residences . The resolution appearing on your agenda is to waive any property tax exchange with other affected taxing agencies in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . Pursuant to said agreement, the proponent has paid a one-time $750 per lot fee in lieu of the District receiving a tax allocation for this property. All fees have now been paid. No. 10 (q) : Receive and File Request for Annexation No. 117 , Sodaro Annexation . The Districts have received a request from Donald Sodaro to annex a 1 . 58 acre residential parcel in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Randall Street in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange. The owner will be required to pay all annexation acreage and processing fees , which include a one-time $750 per acre service fee in lieu of property tax allocations in accordance with the terms of our agreement with the County of Orange re property tax exchanges for annexing properties . The local sewer connection will be provided by the City of Orange. The petitioner indicates he has executed the appropriate agreement with the City. The staff recommends Annexation No. 117 be received and filed and referred to staff . DISTRICT NO. 11 No. 10 (r) : Receive and File Staff Report and Approve Change Order No. 5 to Coast Trunk Sewer Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3 . ( 1) Enclosed with your agenda material is a separate Staff -9- 5/11/83 `. Report outlining some of the difficulties the contractor has encountered in the prosecution of this work . ( 2 ) Included in Change Order No. 5 are extra work items for repair to the City of Huntington Beach lighting conduit, removal and replacement of unstable sub-base material , protection and/or removal of numerous undisclosed oil and utility lines ( see enclosed report) , grading changes requested by the City of Huntington Beach and a ten-day time extension to accomplish the extra work . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 in the amount of $80 , 483 . 58 and ten additional calendar days for the above work . JOINT BOARDS Nos . 12 & 13: Report of the Executive Committee . The Committee met on April 27th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . No. 14 : Public Hearing on Districts ' Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations and the Districts ' tentative 301 ( h) waiver stipulate that the Districts must adopt an approvable pretreatment program effective July 1 , 1983 . The enclosed Districts ' Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilites has been revised to comply with EPA and State Water Resources Control Board requirements and to reflect current Districts ' goals and objectives . The new Ordinance includes important changes to the discharge limitations , non-compliance fees , enforcement procedures and a new excess capacity capital charge. Staff has had three meetings with an ad hoc committee comprised of representatives from a cross section of the industrial community along with members from the Orange County Chamber of Commerce concerning the proposed modifications . Many of the Committee ' s suggestions have been incorporated into the Ordinance. EPA has also reviewed the Ordinance and given its tentative approval . In April , the Boards set the regular meeting on May llth for a public hearing on the Ordinance. Final adoption is scheduled for an adjourned meeting to be held June 1st . -10- 5/11/83 No . 15 : Acceptance of Job No . P2-23-6 , 75-MGD Advanced Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2. This tentative item has been placed on the agenda in the event agreement can be reached with the contractor , H. C. Smith Construction Company, regarding the close-out of this $32 million job . The General Counsel and the Chief Engineer will report on the status at the Board meeting . No . 29 : User Fee Implementation Status Report. The staff will update the Board on the status of implementing the proposed user fee program in District No. 6 . -11- 4 - Cf) L LI LL. LL! LL LiJ •,fir ' * r� ; ` f ,, ., tr; `r `L 1 Mom* � '. .,� '"` r� x F�l! � � ( j .��', �,•�'.�' O CO `i ♦ I V\k Q 6,,- Q-Al- REGULATION S FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROPOSED __ JULY 1, 1983 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY two The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County were formed during the 1946-47 era, but did not commence operation until 1954 when they acquired the existing 'so treatment facilities in Fountain Valley and completed the treatment plant and ocean outfall in Huntington Beach. Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality of wastewaters discharged to the sewer system, the Districts' Boards �► of Directors adopted their first Ordinance regulating the use of the sewerage systems in February 1954. This Ordinance was later amended in February 1958 and again in April 1970. The 1970 revision formally established the Districts' Industrial Waste Division for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow and quality limits and monitoring discharges to the system. The administrative procedures and use charges were modified with each revision, bw but the basic quality requirements remained essentially the same. These quality requirements were effective from February 1954 until July 1, 1976, when a new Ordinance titled "Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities" became �aw effective. That Ordinance was established with four primary goals: • To control heavy metals and non-compatible wastes discharged to the sewer system in a practical and cost-effective manner. • To encourage industry to reduce the volume of water discharged to the sewer system. • To establish an effective monitoring program for the control of industrial wastewaters, with enforcement to insure equal treat- two to all dischargers. • To equitably allocate treatment costs. This document incorporates necessary modifications to implement and enforce current Federal , State and District standards and goals. It will continue to be the Districts' objective to issue permits to all Industrial/Commercial Users who discharge, or have the potential to discharge, incompatible pollutants to the sewerage system and/or whose charge for use .d exceeds that amount allocated to the Districts through the ad valorem tax bill . April 29, 1983 LOS ANGELES COUNTY _ � rrn" LA HABRA L—BM. \ BREA ■n�stiy�- r�Y FVLLE N YORDA -LACENTIA LINDA Ri R R DUE 4A NTq W LA PARK PALMAco 9 - -- - P A AN M j Q CYPRESIL VILLA 3 I STANTON - • ; PARK LOS O ALAMITOS - I ORA GE - N GARDEN GARDEN GA ,_ -- G ROV E INS ER SE muB� nn_ s" T - _ 7 ti O R NTA STI f SA - a. T4 t o q SCALE ti4 e FO NTAIN ALLEY $ HUNTINGTON E"r, BEACH D,„ 4 PACIFIC COSTA E MESA ` ' IRVINE OCEAN — .- Oq sages „� P PG �iNEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1982 am mw TABLE OF CONTENTS No SECTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 mw GENERAL PROVISIONS bw 101. PURPOSE AND POLICY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 102. DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 bw 103. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 104. PERMIT TRANSFER PROHIBITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . 9 bw 105. PERMITS-CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ho 106. MASS EMISSION RATE DETERMINATION . . . . . . . . . 9 107. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ow ARTICLE 2 `w GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON DISCHARGES 201. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ow 202. PROHIBITIONS ON STORM DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER. . 11 „d 203. PROHIBITION ON UNPOLLUTED WATER . . . . . . . . . 12 204. LIMITATIONS ON RADIOACTIVE WASTES . . . . . . . . 12 wo 205. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF GRINDERS . . . . . . . . 12 206. LIMITATIONS ON POINT OF DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . 12 bw 207. LIMITATIONS ON SEPTIC TANK AND CESSPOOL WASTES 13 208. LIMITATIONS ON WASTEWATER STRENGTH AND CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 209. LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL OF SPENT INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS AND SLUDGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 210. BATCH DUMPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 L SECTION PAGE L ARTICLE 3 I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS AND FEES 301. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 L 302. CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . 15 302.1 CLASS I PERMIT APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 L 302.2 CLASS I PERMIT CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS AND STIPULATIONS THAT MAY BE IN A PERMIT . . . . . . . 16 302.3 CLASS I PERMIT FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 302.4 PERMIT DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 , 302.5 TERMS AND CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 302.6 CLASS I CHARGE FOR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Q 303. CLASS II WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . 20 303.1 CLASS II PERMIT APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . 21 303.2 CLASS II PERMIT CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS AND L, STIPULATIONS THAT MAY BE IN A PERMIT . . . . . . . 21 303.3 CLASS II PERMIT FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 303.4 PERMIT DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 303.5 TERMS AND CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 303.6 CLASS II CHARGE FOR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 304. CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . 24 304.1 CLASS III PERMIT APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . 25 �, 304.2 CLASS III PERMIT CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS AND STIPULATIONS THAT MAY BE IN A PERMIT . . . . . . . 26 i� 304.3 CLASS III PERMIT FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 304.4 PERMIT DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 �+ 304.5 CLASS III CHARGE FOR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6w 305. TEMPORARY PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 305.1 TEMPORARY PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Low (ii ) wo SECTION PAGE bmi 305.2 TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . 27 ,m, 305.3 CONDITIONS OF A TEMPORARY PERMIT . . . . . . . . 27 305.4 TEMPORARY PERMITS—FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 'w 305.5 TEMPORARY PERMITS—CHARGE FOR USE (DEWATERING, MISCELLANEOUS) . . . . . . . . . . . 28 bw 305.6 PERMIT DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 306 WASTEHAULER PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 306.1 WASTEHAULER PERMIT—FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 306.2 WASTEHAULER PERMITS—CHARGE FOR USE . . . . . . . 28 306.3 WASTEHAULER PERMIT CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS AND STIPULATIONS THAT MAY BE IN PERMIT . . . . . . . 28 306.4 PERMIT DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 307 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES . 29 308 EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGE . . . . . . . . . . 29 309 OUT OF DISTRICT PERMITS/DISCHARGERS . . . . . . . �29 ARTICLE 4 MONITORING, REPORTING, AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 401. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . 30 401.1 INSPECTION AND SAMPLING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . 30 401.2 REPORT OF ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . 30 how ARTICLE 5 koo FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS 501. PRETREATMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 kmd 501.1 SPILL CONTAINMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 501.2 MONITORING/METERING FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . 32 amd ow i.r SECTION PAGE ARTICLE 6 ENFORCEMENT 601. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICABLE FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 low 601.1 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (WASTEHAULER) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 601 .2 DAMAGE TO FACILITIES OR INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 601.3 REVOCATION OF PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 6m' 601.4 BATCH DUMPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 601.5 ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 601.6 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 ww 601. 7 CIVIL ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 601.8 APPEALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 `"d 601.9 PAYMENT OF CHARGES AND DELINQUENCIES . . . . . . 40 601.10 COLLECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 602 REINSTATEMENT DEPOSIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 ARTICLE 7 CONNECTION PERMITS AND FEES 701. INTRODUCTION - ALL DISTRICTS . . . . . . . . . . 42 702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . 43 702. DISTRICT NO. 2 CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . 43 702. DISTRICT NO. 3 CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . 44 702. DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . 45 702. DISTRICT NO. 6 CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . 47 imw 702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . 47 LOW 702. DISTRICT NO. 11 CONNECTION CHARAGES . . . . . . . 49 6w (iv) i SECTION PAGE ARTICLE 8 JSEVERABILITY 801 . SEVERABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 L� ARTICLE 9 REPEAL v 901 . REPEAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 ARTICLE 10 EFFECTIVE DATE 1001 . EFFECTIVE DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 u U `1 I 6d J �J. �J (v) AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 101. PURPOSE AND POLICY A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for the maximum public benefit from the use of District' s facilities. This shall be accomplished by regulating sewer use and wastewater discharges, by providing equitable distribution of costs in compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations, and by providing pro- cedures that will allow District to comply with requirements placed upon the District by other regulatory agencies. The revenues to be derived from the application of this Ordinance shall be used to defray all costs of providing sewerage service by the District, including, but not limited to, administration, operation, monitoring, maintenance, financing, capital construction, replacement and recovery, and provisions for necessary reserves. B. This Ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the definitions set forth in Section 102. The provisions of the Ordinance shall apply to the direct or indirect discharge of all liquid wastes carried to facilities of the District. C. To comply with Federal and State of California policies and to permit the District to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality, provisions are made in this Ordinance for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the public sewer. This Ordinance establishes quantity and quality limitations on all wastewater discharges which may adversely affect the District' s sewerage systems, processes, effluent quality, or inhibit the District' s ability to meet special discharge criteria. It is the intent of these limitations to improve the quality of wastewater being received for treatment and to encourage water conservation by low all users connected to a public sewer. Implication of this intent is the District's policy of discouraging an increase in the quantity (mass emission) of waste constituents being discharged. This Ordinance also provides for regulation of the degree of waste pretreatment required, the issuance of permits for wastewater discharge and connections and other miscellaneous permits, and the establishment of penalties for violation of the Ordinance. D. Since the District is committed to a policy of wastewater reclamation and reuse in order to provide an alternate source — of water supply, the adoption of programs for reclamation -1- through secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment processes may necessitate more stringent quality requirements on wastewater discharges. In the event that more stringent quality requirements are necessary, the Ordinance will be amended to reflect those changes. iski 102. DEFINITIONS A. Unless otherwise defined herein, terms related to water quality shall be as adopted in the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. The testing procedures for waste constituents and characteristics shall be as provided in 40 CFR 136 (Code of Federal Regulations; Title 40; Protection of Environment; Chapter I, Environmental Protection Agency; Part 136, Test Procedures for the Analyses of Pollutants) , or as specified. i Other terms not herein defined are defined as being the same as set forth in the International Conference of Building Officials Uniform Building Code, Current Edition. 1.r 1 . Ad Valorem Tax shall mean that portion of the basic tax levied and allocated for the benefit of an individual District on the assessed value of land and improvements within its boundaries, exclusive of bonded indebtedness. 2. Assessed Value shall mean that portion of the total assessed value of the land and improvements upon which District taxes are collected and allocated. 3. Batch Dumps shall mean the willful discharging of concentrated non-compatible pollutants in a manner or method that is not approved by the District. s 4. Board shall mean the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California. ` 5. B.O.D. (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) shall mean the measure of biodegradable organic material in domestic or other wastewaters as represented by the oxygen utilized over a period of five days at 20 degrees centigrade and as determined by the appropriate testing procedures. 6. Categorical Pretreatment Standards shall mean those final law regulations promulgated and adopted by EPA for each standard industrial classification (S. I.C. ) or subcategory containing pollutant discharge limits. 7. Chief Engineer shall mean an individual appointed to the position of Chief Engineer. 6g) l -2- i 8. Class I User shall mean any user who: two a) Has a discharge flow of 50,000 gallons or more per normal working day or 12 million gallons or more per year; or 'aw b) Involves the discharge of wastewater which may contain, at any given time, any of the components as specified in Section 204, Limitations on Radioactive Wastes, and in Section 208, Limitations on Wastewater Strength; or, c) Is subject to Federal categorical pretreatment standards d as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 9. Class II User shall mean any industrial user who discharges law less than 50,000 gallons per day or 12 million gallons per year and whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax paid to the District, exclusive of debt service, and is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit. 10. Class III User shall mean any service user that discharges only sanitary waste and whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax paid to the District, exclusive of debt service, and is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I or Class II permit. Unless otherwise stipulated in the permit, Class III law users shall be considered discharging a domestic waste equiva- lent for B.O.D. and suspended solids (250 milligrams per liter) . ttw 11 . C.O.D. (Chemical Oxygen Demand) shall mean the measure of chemically oxidizable material in domestic or other waste- waters as determined by appropriate testing procedures and bw expressed in terms of mass per volume (mg/1 ) . 12. CSDOC shall mean County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. wow 13. Compatible Pollutant shall mean a combination of biochemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, pH, fecal coliform bacteria, plus other pollutants that the District' s treatment facilities are designed to accept and/or remove. Some compatible pollutants may be considered incompatible when discharged in significant quantities. 14. Development shall mean parcel of land on which dwelling units, commercial or industrial buildings or other improvements are built. 15. Discharger shall mean any person who discharges or causes a discharge of wastewater directly or indirectly to a public sewer. Discharger shall mean the same as User. 16. District shall mean any individual or combination of individual County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 or 11 of Orange County and shall include any Districts that are �, -3- w formed after the effective date of this Ordinance that are included in the Joint Administrative Organization. iW 17. District Connection Charge shall mean a fee imposed by the y governing District for connecting directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewer which ultimately discharges into a District sewerage facility. I 18. District Sewerage Facility shall mean any property belonging to the District used in the treatment, reclamation, reuse, transportation, or disposal of wastewater. a. 19. Domestic Wastewater shall mean the liquid and solid and water- borne wastes derived from the ordinary living processes of humans of such character as to permit satisfactory disposal , without special treatment, into the public sewer or by means of a private disposal system. The strength shall be considered to have 250 milligrams per liter (250 mg/1 ) BOD and suspended solids. 20. Dwelling Unit shall mean a single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, including r.r permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. For the purpose of this Ordinance, a mobile home space shall be considered as a Dwelling Unit. More than one Dwelling Unit per structure and/or lot shall be deemed multiple Dwelling Units. 21 . Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) shall mean the mutual agreement whereby the District can adjust permitted limits to allow a company adequate time for implementation of pretreatment practices and/or equipment to insure permit compliance. 22. Floor Area shall mean the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building or portion thereof, exclusive of ramps, docks, vent shafts and courts. The floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable area under the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above. 23. General Manager shall mean the individual duly designated by the Board of Directors of the District to administer this Ordinance. 24. Incompatible Pollutant shall mean any pollutant which is not a compatible pollutant as defined herein. 25. Industrial User shall mean any user that discharges water- carried wastes and wastewaters to the District' s sewerage facilities, as defined by EPA regulations set forth in r+ 1 ' -4- �.r too 40 CFR 35.905 and as identified in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual , 1972, Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under Divisions A, B, C, D, E and I. 26. Industrial Wastewater shall mean all water-carried wastes and wastewater of the community, excluding domestic wastewater, and shall include all wastewater from any producing, manufacturing, processing, agricultural or other operation. These may also include wastes of human origin similar to domestic wastewaters. 27. Inspector shall mean a person authorized by the General Manager to inspect any development discharging or anticipating discharge to wastewater conveyance, processing and disposal facilities. 28. LEL (Lower Explosive Limit) shall mean the minimum concentration of a combustible gas or vapor in air (usually a expressed in percent by volume at sea level ) which will ignite if an ignition source (sufficient ignition energy) is present. 29. Liquid Waste Manifest shall mean that receipt which is retained Ty the generator as required by the California Department of Health Services and/or the United States Government pursuant to the Resources Conservation Recovery Act. 30. Local Sewering Agency shall mean any public agency or private corporation responsible for the collection and disposal of 14W wastewater to the District' s sewerage facilities duly authorized under the laws of the State of California to construct and/or maintain public sewers. MW 31 . Mass Emission Rate shall mean the weight of material discharged to the sewer system during a given time interval . Unless otherwise specified, the mass emission rate shall mean pounds per day of a particular constituent or combination of constituents. 32. � shall mean permissive. 33. Milligrams per liter shall mean a unit of the concentration of water or wastewater constituent. It is O.00lg of the constitu- ent in 1 ,000 ml of water. It has replaced the unit formerly used commonly, parts per million, to which it is approximately equivalent in reporting the results of water and wastewater analysis. 34. New Construction shall mean any structure planned or under construction for which a connection permit has not been issued. 35. Normal Working Day shall mean the period of time during which production and/or operation is taking place. �, -5- 36. pH shall mean the logarithm of the reciprocal of the quantity of hydrogen ions in moles per liter of solution used in �, expressing both acidity and alkalinity on a scale ranging from 0 to 14 where 7 represents neutrality, numbers less than 7 increasing acidity, and more than 7 increasing alkalinity. r.r 37. Permittee shall mean a person who has applied for and received permission to discharge pollutants into the District' s sewerage I ' system subject to the requirements and conditions established by the District. 38. Person shall mean any individual , partnership, firm, association, corporation or public agency, including the State of California and the United States of America. 39. Pollutant shall mean any constituent or characteristic of wastewaters on which a discharge limitation may be imposed either by the District or the regulatory bodies empowered to regulate the District. " 40. Pretreatment shall mean the reduction of the amount of pollu- tants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the a.r nature of pollutant properties in wastewater to a less harmful state prior to discharge of the wastewater into the District' s system. The reduction or alteration can be obtained by physi- 6r� cal , chemical or biological process, or process changes by other means. i 41 . Pretreatment Facility shall mean any works or devices for the treatment or flow limitation of wastewater prior to discharge into a public sewer. 42. Priority Pollutants shall mean a listing of the toxic pollutants identified by EPA as having the greatest environmental concern and as incompatible and requiring pretreatment prior to discharge in order to prevent inter- ference with District's operation, sludge contamination or treatment system pass-through into receiving waters or into the atmosphere. 43. Public Agency shall mean the State of California and any city, 1 , county, district, other local authority or public body of or �+ within this State. i ' 44. Public Sewer shall mean a sewer owned and operated by the District, a City or other local sewering agency which is tributary to treatment facilities operated by the District. All public sewers must be constructed in accordance with District' s regulations and specifications for construction of sanitary sewers. 45. RCRA shall mean Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 �+ (42 U.S.C. 6901 , et sec . ). -6- 6d 46. Regulatory Agencies shall mean those agencies affecting the operation of the County Sanitation District of Orange County, including, but not limited to, the following: too a) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, San Francisco and Washington, DC (EPA) ; b) California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) ; and, wd c) California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) . ,aw 47. Routine Sampling shall mean a twenty-four (24) hour composite sample. 48. Sampling and Evaluation Program (S&E) shall mean the determination of mass emission of constituents or other conditions specified in the user' s permit over a period of time not to exceed ten normal working days. 49. Sanitary Waste shall mean domestic wastewater. low 50. Sewage shall mean wastewater. 51 . Sewerage Facilities shall mean any and all facilities used for VZ-i collecting, conveying, pumping, treating and disposing of wastewater. 52. Shall shall mean mandatory. moo 53. Spill Containment shall mean a protection system installed by the permittee to prohibit the accidental discharge to the sewer of incompatible pollutants. 54. Standard Industrial Classification (S. I.C. ) shall mean a system of classifying industries as identified in the S. I.C. Manual , 1972, or subsequent edition, as prepared by the Office of Management and Budget. 55. Standard Methods shall mean procedures described in the current edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, as published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation. 56. Suspended Solids shall mean any insoluble material contained as a component of wastewater and capable of separation from the liquid portion of said waste by laboratory filtration as deter- mined by the appropriate testing procedure. 57. Tax Credit shall mean that portion of the discharger' s County of Orange Ad Valorem Tax Bill allocable to the District, exclusive of bonded indebtedness. -7- 58. Temporary User shall mean any discharger who is granted temporary permission by the District to discharge unpolluted �r water, storm drainage or ground water to the District' s sewerage facilities. 59. T.O.C. (Total Organic Carbon) shall mean the measure of total organic carbon in domestic or other wastewater as determined by the appropriate testing procedure. 60. Unpolluted Water shall mean water to which no constituent has been added either intentionally or accidentally. 61 . User shall mean any person who discharges or causes a discharge of wastewater directly or indirectly to a public sewer. User shall mean the same as Discharger. 62. User Charge shall mean a charge established and levied by the District that provides for the operation and maintenance expenses, capital expansion, capital recovery and adequate reserves for the sewage treatment works upon residential , commercial and industrial users in proportion to the use of the treatment works by their respective class. 63. Waste shall mean sewage and any and all other waste substances, liquid, solid, gaseous or radioactive, associated with human habitation or of human or animal nature, including such wastes placed within containers of whatever nature prior to and for the purpose of disposal . 64. Wastehauler shall mean any person carrying on or engaging in vehicular transport of waste as part of, or incidental to, any business for the purpose of discharging said waste into the District's system. ! i 65. Wastewater shall mean waste and water, whether treated or v untreated, discharged into or permitted to enter a public sewer. 66. Wastewater Constituents and Characteristics shall mean the individual chemical , physical , bacteriological and radiological parameters, including volume and flow rate and such other para- meters that serve to define, classify or measure the quality +� and quantity of wastewater. B. Words used in this Ordinance in the singular may include the ,.d plural and the plural the singular. Use of masculine shall mean feminine and use of feminine shall mean masculine. r -8- 103. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION All information and data on a user shall be available to the public and governmental agencies without restriction unless the user specifically requests and is able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the District that the release of such information would divulge information, pro- cesses or methods which would be detrimental to the user' s competitive position. The demonstration of the need for confidentiality made by the permittee must meet the burden necessary for holding such infor- mation from the general public under applicable State and Federal law. In any event, information concerning wastewater quality and quantity will not be deemed confidential . 104. PERMIT TRANSFER PROHIBITIONS - Wastewater discharge permits issued under this Ordinance are for a specific user, for a specific operation at a specific location and create no vested rights. Discharge permits or their mass emission rates shall not be transferred for an operation at a different location nor for a new or changed operation without prior approval of the General Manager. 105. PERMITS - CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP Upon the sale or transfer of ownership of any business operating under a permit issued by the District, the permittee shall notify the District in writing prior to the transfer. The successor owner shall be required to apply for and receive a new permit in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. m 106. MASS EMISSION RATE DETERMINATION A. Maximum mass emission rates for incompatible and/or compatible pollutants that are present or anticipated in the user' s wastewater discharge may be set for each user and made an "' applicable part of each user's permit. These rates shall be based on Section 208, Limitations on Wastewater Strength, and the user' s average daily wastewater discharge for the past three years. When discharge data for three years is not available, data for a year, the most recent representative data, or that which is mutually acceptable to the user and the District shall be used. All mass emission rates must receive final approval by the Chief Engineer. B. The excess use of water to establish an artificially high data base for mass emission rates is prohibited. To verify operating data, an industry may be requested to inventory all wastewater streams. m -9- I C. The District may revise mass emission rates previously established in the discharger' s permit at any time, based on current and/or anticipated operating data or changes in Federal or State regula- tions. 107. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY i Any of the duties of the General Manager established by this Ordinance may be delegated. i i L� r.l l 1 �r aw+ -10- S.ri ARTICLE 2 GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON DISCHARGES 201. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES .�, No person shall discharge a quantity or quality of wastewater directly or indirectly to sewerage facilities owned by or tributary -- to the District' s sewerage system which causes, or is capable of causing, either alone or by interaction with other substances: A. A fire or explosion; "d B. Obstruction of flow in the sewer system or damage to the sewerage facilities; tw C. Danger to life or safety of any person; D. Impairment of the effective maintenance or operation of the sewerage system; - E. The release of toxic or malodorous gas-producing substances; F. Interference with the wastewater treatment process; G. The District's effluent or any- other product of the treatment process, residues, sludges or scums, to be unsuitable for reclamation, reuse or disposal ; H. Discoloration or any other condition which affects the quality of the District's treatment works effluent in such a manner that receiving water quality requirements established by regulatory agencies cannot be met; I. Conditions which violate any statute or any rule, regulation, or ordinance of any public agency or State or Federal regulatory body having jurisdiction over the discharge of wastewater through the sanitary sewer system. 202. PROHIBITIONS ON STORM DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER A. Storm water, ground water, street drainage, surface drainage, subsurface drainage, or yard drainage shall not be discharged directly or indirectly to the District' s sewerage facilities. Pursuant to Section 305, et seq., the Districts may approve the Wet discharge of such water on a temporary basis only when no alternate method of disposal is reasonably available. Approval may also be given to mitigate an environmental or health hazard with the installation of appropriate rainwater diversion devices or facilities. ,�, -11- �.d B. If a permit is granted for the discharge of such water into a public sewer, the user shall pay the applicable charges established herein and shall meet such other conditions as required by the District. 1 ' 203. PROHIBITION ON UNPOLLUTED WATER A. Unpolluted water such as single pass cooling water shall not be i discharged directly or indirectly to the District' s sewerage �r facilities. Pursuant to Section 305, et seq. , the District may approve the discharge of such water on a temporary basis only when no alternate method of disposal or reuse is reasonably available. ,m, B. If a permit is granted for the discharge of such water into a public sewer, the user shall pay the applicable charges established herein and shall meet such other conditions as required by the District. 204. LIMITATIONS ON RADIOACTIVE WASTES No person shall discharge, or cause to be discharged, any radioactive waste into a public sewer except: A. When the person is authorized to use radioactive- materials by the State Department of Health or other governmental agency empowered to regulate the use of radioactive materials; B. When the waste is discharged in strict conformity with current California Radiation Control Regulations (California Administrative Code, Title 17) for safe disposal ; C. When the person is in compliance with all rules and regulations ;J of all other applicable regulatory agencies; and, D. When a Class I permit has been obtained from CSDOC. " 205. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF GRINDERS ! ' Waste from industrial or commercial grinders shall not be discharged into a public sewer, except wastes generated in packing or preparing food or food products. Such grinders must shred the waste to a degree that all particles will be carried freely under normal flow conditions prevailing in the public sewer. 206. LIMITATIONS ON POINT OF DISCHARGE i No person, except local sewering agencies involved in maintenance functions of sanitary sewer facilities, shall discharge any wastewater directly into a manhole or other opening in a sewer other than through -12- ` an approved building sewer, unless approved by District upon written application by the user and payment of the applicable fees and charges established herein. 207. LIMITATIONS ON SEPTIC TANK AND CESSPOOL WASTES A wastehauler/user proposing to discharge septic tank, cesspool wastes or other biodegradeable material into a District facility must have both a valid Orange County Health Department and CSDOC Permit as required by Section 306. Such wastewaters shall be discharged only at a location specified by the District. No person shall discharge constituents in excess of those specified in the respective permit. 208. LIMITATIONS ON WASTEWATER STRENGTH AND CHARACTERISTICS A. No person shall discharge, after the date specified, wastewater containing constituents in excess of the quantities listed in Table I. TABLE I DISCHARGE LIMITS, mg/l CONSTITUENT July 1, 1983 Arsenic 2.0 Cadmium 1.0 Chromium (total ) 2.0 Copper 3.0 Lead 2.0 Mercury 0.03 Nickel 10.0 Silver 5.0 Zinc 10.0 Cyanide (total 5.0 Cyanide (free) 1.0 Total Identifiable Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (TICH) 0.02 Total Sulfide 5.0 Dissolved Sulfide 0.5 taw Oil or grease of mineral , petroleum origin 100.0 1The term "free cyanide" shall mean those cyanides amenable to chlorination as described in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1972, Standard D 2036-72 Method B, page 553. -13- B. No person shall discharge any wastewater: 1 . Having a temperature higher than 140 degrees Fahrenheit, 60 degrees Centigrade; 2. Having a pH less than 6.0 or greater than 12.0; 3. Containing in excess of 0.02 mg/l total identifiable chlori- nated hydrocarbons to include at least the following: DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, both isomers) , DOE (dichlorodiphenylethylene), DOD (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane), Aldrin, Benzene Hexachloride (alpha, beta and gamma isomers), Chlordane, Endrin, Heptachlor, Dieldrin, and PCB' s } , (Polychlorinated biphenyls: Aroclors 1221, 1228, 1232, 1242, 1248, 1254, 1260, and 1262), Pentachlorophenol , chlori- nated phenols, toxaphine; 4. Containing other materials, including, but not limited to, ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, priority pollutants, suspended solids, oil or grease of animal or vegetable origin, total dissolved L, solids, and phenolic compounds, in quantities that may cause or are found to cause problems in the sewerage facilities; li 5. Producing a gaseous mixture that is 10% or greater of the lower explosive limit (LEL). Prohibited materials include, but are not limited to, gasoline, kerosenes, naptha, benzene, toluene, zylene, ethers, ketones and alcohols; 6. Containing material which will readily settle or cause an obstruction to flow in the sewer, such- as, but not limited to, sand, mud, glass, metal filings, diatomaceous earth, asphalt, dead animals, wood, bones, hair and fleshings; 7. Containing recognizable portions of the human anatomy; and, 8. In violation of any applicable Federal or State standards or other local regulations covering wastewater disposal . 209. LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL OF SPENT INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS AND SLUDGES Materials of quantity or quality in violation or prohibited by this � Ordinance or any permit issued under this Ordinance must be disposed of in a legal manner at a legally acceptable point of disposal as defined by the appropriate regulatory body. All liquid waste manifests shall be supplied to the District upon request. Permittees shall retain manifests for a minimum of two years. 210. BATCH DUMPS No person shall willfully discharge concentrated non-compatible pollutants in a manner or method that is not approved by District. Non-compliance fees for such willful discharge will be applicable as shown on Tables II and III. w -14- LU ARTICLE 3 WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS AND FEES 301 . INTRODUCTION �+ A. To provide the maximum public benefit from the use of District facilities, written authorization to use said facilities is required. This written authorization shall be in the form of a permit. No vested right shall be given by issuance of permits provided for in this Ordinance. B. The discharge permit shall be in one of five forms and is dependent upon the type of discharger, volume and characteristics of wastewater to be discharged. The five wastewater discharge permits are: 1 . Class I Permit 2. Class II Permit 3. Class III Permit 4. Temporary Permits 5. Wastehauler Permit 302. CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS 40 A. Class I wastewater discharge permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use and fees established by the District. The conditions of 'r wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly enforced by the - District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal regulations. _ B. All Class I users proposing to discharge into a public sewer shall obtain a wastewater discharge permit before discharging. For pur- poses of this Ordinance, a Class I user is any user who: 1 . Has a discharge flow of 50,000 gallons or more per normal working day or 12 million gallons or more per year; 2. Involves the discharge of wastewater which may contain at any given time, any of the components as specified in Section 204, �' Limitations on Radioactive Wastes, or Section 208, Limitations on Wastewater Strength; or, 3. Is subject to final Federal categorical pretreatment standards. .�, —15— wild �.r 302.1 Class I Permit Application A. Users seeking a Class I wastewater discharge permit shall complete and file with the District an application on the form prescribed by the District. The applicant shall be required to submit, in units I and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1 . Name, address, assessor' s parcel number(s) and S. I.C. number(s); 2. Volume of wastewater to be discharged; 3. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as deemed necessary by the District, including, but not limited to, those mentioned in Section 208 of this Ordinance. These constituents and characteristics shall be determined by a State Certified Laboratory or by a laboratory of the discharger approved by the District; 4. Time and duration of discharge; 5. Landscaped area in square feet; I 6. Tons of cooling tower capacity; 7. Number of employees and average hours of work per employee per day; 8. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if applicable. B. The applicant may also be required to submit site plans, floor plan, mechanical and plumbing plans and details to show all sewers, ;Wei spill containment, clarifiers and appurtenances by size, location and elevation for evaluation. l C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater discharge permit, sub- ject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District' s system. low 302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations that may be in Permit: C A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible pollutants; B. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements for flow 6a� regulations and equalization; C. Requirements for maintaining plant records relating to wastewater 6W discharge and liquid waste manifests as specified by District; -16- �, D. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain, at his own expense, pH control , flow monitoring and/or sampling facilities; E. Requirements to submit tax and water bills; F. Requirements to self-monitor; G. Requirements to notify the District in writing prior to the physical expansion of any wet processes; H. Predetermined rate or value for wastewater strength characteris- tics; I. Requirements for submission of technical reports, discharge reports and liquid waste manifest; J. Other provisions which may be applicable to insure compliance with all provisions of this Ordinance. K. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District' s system. 302.3 Class I Permit Fee The Class I permit fee shall be in the amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable within forty- five (45) days of invoicing by the District. 302.4 Permit Duration A. Class I permits shall normally be issued for a period of one year. B. Two-year permit may be issued if the permittee has: 1 . Shown good faith efforts in meeting permit requirments; VM 2. Installed pollution control devices to improve the quality of wastewater to be discharged; two 3. Made future plans for additional pollution control as required; 4. Provided for proper disposal of spent solutions; 5. Instituted wet floor elimination techniques; 6. Consistently paid applicable fees and charges in a timely manner. -17- C. A three-year permit may be issued when a permittee has: ti 1 . Remained in full compliance with this Ordinance and its permit for a period of two years; 1 2. Instituted water conservation practices; 3. Shown the ability to self-monitor accurately as required by the District; �r 4. Consistently paid applicable fees and charges in a timely ti manner. 302.5 Terms and Conditions The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change by the District during the life of the permit as requirements or conditions of this Ordinance are modified. Permittees shall be informed of any major changes in their permit at least ninety (90) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 302.6 Class I Charge for Use A. The purpose of a charge for use is to insure that each recipient of sewerage service from the District pays its reasonably pro- +� portionate share of all the costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating and disposing of sewage in District facilities are exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the total maintenance, operation, } capital expenditures and reserve requirements for providing wastewater collection, treatment and disposal . B. A discharger who is issued a Class I wastewater discharge permit under the provisions of this Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance with the formula contained herein and the unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. These fees shall be invoiced on a quarterly basis. The quarterly low invoice may be based upon an estimate of the annual use as determined by the District. Annually, the District shall compute the charge for use based upon actual use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual reconciliation statement. The charge for use is payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. A credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a r'' permit has been issued by the District, exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service. A credit will also be allowed iW y , -18- � for any separate use fee adopted by the Board of Directors by separate ordinance. Debt service shall be considered as interest payable on District' s general obligation bonds and annual bond redemptions. C. The charge for use shall be computed by the following formula: Charge for Use = VoV + BoB + SoS - Tax Credit Where V = total annual volume of flow, in millions of gallons B = total annual discharge of biochemical oxygen demand, in thousands of pounds S = total annual discharge of suspended solids, in thousands of pounds p Vo,Bo,So = unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the District' s Board of Directors, based upon the funding requirements of providing sewerage service, in dollars per unit as described in Paragraph D below: D. The unit charge rates in the charge for use formula shall be determined by the following method: 1 . The total annual operation and maintenance funding requirements of the sewerage system shall be allocated among the three wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids in accordance with the General Manager' s determination as to the costs associated with each parameter - and pursuant to applicable requirements of State and Federal regulatory agencies. The operation and maintenance costs as "y distributed to flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids shall be divided by the projected annual total flow volume and weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 2. A capital facilities charge for capital recovery and capital improvement shall be levied at the rate of $200 per million - gallons of wastewater. This charge shall be allocated among wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids in accordance with the General Manager' s determination of which portion of the charge predominantly relates to each parameter. The capital facilities charge distributed to biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids shall be divided by the projected annual weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. ,� -19- 3. The unit charge rates for each respective wastewater parameter in (1) and (2) above shall be summed. The unit wastewater charge rates so determined will be expressed in dollars per million gallons for Vo, and in dollars per thousand pounds for Bo and So. ti E. Other measurements of the organic content of the wastewater of a discharger, such as C.O.D. or T.O.C. , may be used instead of B.O.D. However, the discharger must establish for the District a relationship between the B.O.D. of his wastewater and the parameter of measure. This relationship shall be used by the District in determining the charge for use. When wastewater from sanitary facilities is discharged separately from the other wastewater of a discharger, the charge for use for discharging the sanitary wastewater may be determined by using the following: 1. 10,000 gallons per employee per year; 2. B.O.D. and suspended solids to be calculated at 250 mg/l per employee per year. (The number of employees will be considered as the average number of people employed full-time on a daily basis. This may be determined by averaging the number of people employed at the beginning and ending of each quarter, or other period that reflects normal employment fluctuations) . 303. CLASS II WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS A. Class II wastewater discharge permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use and fees established by the District. The conditions of wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal regulations. B. All Class II users proposing to discharge into a public sewer shall obtain a wastewater discharge permit before discharging. For pur- poses of this Ordinance, a Class II user is any user who: ti 1 . Has a discharge flow of less than 50,000 gallons per normal working day or 12 million gallons or more per year; 2. Whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service; and, 3. Is not otherwise required to obtain a Classs I permit. -20- �, -- 303.1 Class II Permit Application "i A. Users seeking a Class II wastewater discharge permit shall complete and file with the District an application on the form prescribed by the District. The applicant shall be required to submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1 . Name, address, assessor' s parcel number(s) and S.I.C. number(s); 2. Volume of wastewater to be discharged; 3. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as deemed necessary by the District, including, but not limited to, those mentioned in Section 208 of this Ordinance. These constituents and characteristics shall be determined by a State Certified Laboratory or by a laboratory of the discharger approved by the District; 4. Time and duration of discharge; 5. Landscaped area in square feet; - 6. Tons of cooling tower capacity; 7. Number of employees and average hours of work per employee per day; 8. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if applicable. - B. The applicant may also be required to submit site plans, floor plan, mechanical and plumbing plans and details to show all sewers, spill containment, clarifiers and appurtenances by size, location and elevation for evaluation. C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater discharge permit, sub- ject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system. - 303.2 Class II Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations that may be in Permit: A. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements for flow regulations and equalization; B. Requirements for maintaining plant records relating to wastewater discharge as specified by District and affording District' s access to records as requested. -21- C. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain, at his own expense, flow monitoring and/or sampling f aci.lities; D. Requirements for self-monitoring; 1 E. Requirement to submit copies of tax and water bills; F. Predetermined rate or value for wastewater strength characteristics; G. Requirements for submission of technical reports or discharge reports; H. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District' s system. low 303.3 Class II Permit Fee I The Class II permit fee shall be in the amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable within forty- I five (45) days of invoicing by the District. i No 303.4 Permit Duration Class II permits shall be issued for a period of not to exceed three years 303.5 Terms and Conditions The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change by the District during the life of the permit as requirements or conditions of this Ordinance are modified. Permittees shall be informed of any major changes in their permit at least ninety (90) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable 1 time schedule for compliance. 303.6 Class II Charge for Use A. The purpose of a charge for use is to insure that each recipient of sewerage service from the District pays its reasonably pro- portionate share of all the costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating and disposing of sewage in District facilities are I ' exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures and reserve requirements for providing wastewater collection, treatment and disposal . -22- ` B. A discharger who is issued a Class II wastewater discharge permit under the provisions of this Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance with the formula contained herein and the unit charge - rates adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. These fees shall be invoiced on a quarterly basis. The quarterly invoice may be based upon an estimate of the annual use as determined by the District. Annually, the District shall compute the charge for use based upon actual use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual reconciliation statement. The charge for use is payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. A credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a permit has been issued by the District, exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service. A credit will also be allowed for any separate use fee adopted by the Board of Directors by separate ordinance. Debt service shall be _ considered as interest payable on District' s general obligation bonds and annual bond redemptions. C. The charge for use shall be computed by the following formula: low Charge for Use = VoV + BoB + SoS - Tax Credit -- Where V = total annual volume of flow, in millions of gallons B = total annual discharge of biochemical oxygen demand, in thousands of pounds S = total annual discharge of suspended solids, in thousands of pounds Vo,Bo,So = unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the District' s Board of Directors, based upon the funding requirements of providing sewerage service, in dollars per unit as described below. law D. The unit charge rates in the charge for use formula shall be established annually and shall be determined by the following method: asp 1 . The total annual operation and maintenance funding requirements -- of the sewerage system shall be allocated among the three wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids in accordance with the General Manager's _ determination as to the costs associated with each parameter and pursuant to applicable requirements of State and Federal regulatory agencies. The operation and maintenance costs as distributed to flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids shall be divided by the projected annual total flow Uzi volume and weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended -23- solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. +� 2. A capital facilities charge for capital recovery and capital } improvement shall be levied at the rate of $200 per million gallons of wastewater. This charge shall be allocated among the three wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids in accordance with the General Manager' s determination of which portion of the charge predominantly relates to each parameter. The capital facilities charge distributed to biochemical oxygen demand and suspended 7 solids shall be divided by the projected annual weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 3. The unit charge rates for each respective wastewater parameter in (1) and (2) above shall be summed. The unit wastewater charge rates so determined will be expressed in dollars per million gallons for Vo, and in dollars per thousand pounds for Bo and So. E. Other measurements of the organic content of the wastewater of a lei discharger, such as C.O.D. or T.O.C. , may be used instead of B.O.D. However, the discharger must establish for the District a relationship between the B.O.D. of his wastewater and the other parameter of measure. This relationship shall be used by the Districts in determining the charge for use. When wastewater from sanitary facilities is discharged separately from the other wastewater of a discharger, the charge for use for discharging the sanitary wastewater may be determined by using the following: 1. 10,000 gallons per employee per year; 2. B.O.D. and suspended solids to be calculated at 250 mg/l per employee per year. (The number of employees will be considered as the average number of people employed full-time on a daily basis. This may be determined by averaging the number of people employed at the beginning and ending of each quarter, or other period that reflects normal employment fluctuations). 304. CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS A. Class III wastewater discharge permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use and fees established by the District. The conditions of wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal regulations. -24- B. All Class III users proposing to discharge into a public sewer shall obtain a wastewater discharge permit before discharging. For purposes of this Ordinance, a Class III user is any user who discharges only sanitary waste and who is not required to obtain a Class I or Class II permit and whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax paid to the District, exclusive of debt service. Unless otherwise stipulated in the permit, Class III users shall be considered to discharge a domestic waste equivalent for B.O.D. and suspended solids (250 milligrams per liter) . 304.1 Class III Permit Application A. Users seeking a Class III wastewater discharge permit shall complete and file with the District an application on the form prescribed by the District. The applicant shall be required to submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1 . Name, address, assessor' s parcel number(s) and S. I.C. number(s); 2. Volume of wastewater to be discharged; - 3. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as deemed necessary by the District, including, but not limited to, those mentioned in Section 208 of this Ordinance. These constituents and characteristics shall be determined by a State Certified Laboratory or by a laboratory of the discharger approved by the District; 4. Time and duration of discharge; 5. Landscaped area in square feet; 6. Tons of cooling tower capacity; 7. Number of employees and average hours of work per employee per day; 8. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if applicable. B. The applicant may also be required to submit site plans, floor plan, mechanical and plumbing plans and details to show all sewers, spill containment, clarifiers and appurtenances by size, location and elevation for evaluation. C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the data furnished, the District may issue a Class III wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to ¢, protect the District' s system. -25- aad 304.2 Class III Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations ti that may be in Permit �y A. Requirement to submit tax and water bills; y B. Pre-determined rate or value for B.O.D. and suspended solids. s 304.3 Class III Permit Fee iW The Class III permit fee shall be in the amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. 304.4 Permit Duration Class III permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed three years. 304.5 Class III Charge For Use b. A. The purpose of a charge for use is to insure that each recipient of sewerage service from the District pays its reasonably propor- tionate share of all costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating, and disposing of sewage in District' s. f acilities are exclusive of any fees levied by local severing agencies. The charge for use +` shall be based on the total maintenance, operation, capital expen- ditures and reserve requirements for providing wastewater collec- tion, treatment and disposal . B. A discharger who is issued a Class III wastewater discharge permit under the provisions of this Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance with the provisions contained herein and the unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. This charge shall be determined as follows: 1 . The total annual operation and maintenance funding requirements of the sewerage system established in the adopted budget shall be distributed to the wastewater charge parameter flow. The 4d operation and maintenance costs as distributed to flow shall be divided by the projected annual flow volume to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 2. A capital facilities charge for capital recovery and capital improvements shall be levied at the rate of $200 per million gallons of wastewater. �r 3. The charge rate for the wastewater parameter of flow as determined in (1) and (2) above shall be summed, and the rate so determined will be expressed in dollars per million gallons. -26- y.,, 4. The District shall invoice the user on a quarterly basis in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the General Manager. The quarterly estimated charge for use shall be calculated by multiplying the charge rate as determined in (3) above and the estimated volume of wastewater discharged. Annually, the Districts shall compute the charge for use based upon actual use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual reconciliation statement. The charge for use is payable within �+ forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the Districts. A credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a permit has been issued by the District, exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service. A credit will also be allowed for any separate use fee adopted by the Board of Directors by separate ordinance. Debt service shall be considered as interest payable on District' s general obligation bonds and annual bond redemptions. 305. TEMPORARY PERMITS 305.1 Temporary Permit A permit shall be required of all users granted temporary permission by 4° the District to discharge unpolluted water, storm drainage and ground water discharging directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage facilities (see Sections 202 and 203). This temporary permit may be granted when no alternate method of disposal ' is reasonably available. The provisions of Section 208(B) of this Ordinance pertaining to wastewater strength and characteristics shall apply. 305.2 Temporary Permit Application Users seeking a temporary wastewater discharge permit shall complete and file with the District, prior to commencing discharge, an applica- tion in the form prescribed by the District. This application shall ` w be accompanied by the applicable fees, plumbing plans or other data as needed by the District for review. 305.3 Conditions Of A Temporary Permit The Districts may specify and make part of each temporary permit specific conditions and pretreatment requirements. 305.4 Temporary Permits - Fees A fee for temporary permits shall be paid by the applicant in the amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable prior to issuance of a permit. Inn -27- r.r 305.5 Temporary Permits - Charge for Use (Dewateri.ng, Miscellaneous) A charge for use to cover all costs of the District for providing sewerage service and monitoring shall be established by the General Manager. A deposit to be determined by the General Manager sufficient to pay the estimated charges for use shall accompany the temporary 'int permit application, and said deposit shall be applied to the charges for use. ti 305.6 Permit Duration Temporary permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed one year. The terms and conditions of the permit may be subject to modification and change by the District during the life of the permit as limitations or requirements identified in Article 2 are modified. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 3 ' v 306 WASTEHAULER PERMIT All wastehaulers proposing to discharge waste into the District' s disposal station shall obtain a wastehauler discharge permit. 306. 1 Wastehauler Permits - Fees A fee for wastehauler permits shall be paid by the applicant in the amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable prior to issuance of a permit. 306.2 Wastehauler Permits - Charge for Use A charge for use to cover all costs of the District for providing the disposal station service and monitoring shall be established by resolu- tion of the Board of Directors. rr 306.3 Wastehauler Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations that may be in Permit ,e► A. Requirements for heavy metals and other priority pollutants. B. Requirements for maintaining and submitting wastehauling records, as required by RCRA and state or local law. I 306.4 Permit Duration Wastehauler permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed one year. -28- ar 307. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES Where ad valorem taxes are utilized by the District for payment of maintenance and operating costs, no use charges, as specified herein, shall be payable for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste from property within the District boundaries owned or leased by local public agencies; provided, however, that such property is not used for proprietary purposes and subject to modification if the District determines the local public agency is placing a significant demand on the District' s sewerage system. The United States Government and State of California facilities are not exempt. 308. EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGE low New developments or existing developments that expand operations that require substantial sewer capacity may be subject to an excess capacity facilities charge in an amount to be determined by the Board of Directors on a case-by-case basis. 309. OUT OF DISTRICT PERMITS/DISCHARGERS - Industrial wastewater discharge permits for dischargers located outside of the District' s service area, but tributary to the Districts ' sewerage facilities, will be issued by the local sewering agency after approval by the District and/or through special agreement. Inspection of the discharger' s plant to determine compliance with industrial waste discharge regulations will be made under a coordinated plan of inspec- tion developed by the affected agencies. Industrial waste discharge regulations and effluent limitations of affected agencies will apply to the discharger unless one agency specifically waives its requirements. d a -29- i , ARTICLE 4 MONITORING, REPORTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1 �r 401. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS A. Monitoring for Annual Charge for Use: br The wastewater characteristics of the discharger needed for deter- mining the annual charge for use shall be submitted by the discharger to the District, if requested. The frequency of analy- ses and reporting may be set forth in the permit. The analyses of these characteristics shall be by a laboratory approved by the District. Analyses performed by District' s personnel may be used in the determination of the annual charge for use. B. Monitoring for Compliance with Permit Requirements: The wastewater constituents and characteristics for any limitations and requirements as specified in the user' s permit may be monitored by the discharger. Monitoring reports on these constituents and characteristics may be requested by the District. The frequency and determination of reporting shall be set forth in the permit. The analyses of the constituents and characteristics shall be by a laboratory approved by the District. The preparation of the monitoring report, if by other than the discharger, shall be by a firm approved by the District. 401 .1 Inspection and Sampling Conditions 1� The District may inspect the wastewater generating and disposal facilities of any user to ascertain whether the intent of this W Ordinance is being met and the user is complying with all requirements. Persons or occupants of premises where wastewater is created or dis- charged shall allow the District, or its representatives, reasonable access during the normal working day to all parts of the wastewater generating and disposal facilities for the purposes of inspection and sampling. The District shall have the right to set up on the user' s property such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling or metering W operations. Where a user has security measures in force, the user shall make necessary arrangements so that personnel from the District will be permitted to enter without delay for the purpose of performing L, their specific responsibilities. 401 .2 Report of Accidental Discharge iw In the event the discharger is unable to comply with any of the permit conditions due to a breakdown of waste treatment equipment, accidents caused by human error or acts of God, the discharger shall notify the -30- i District by telephone as soon as he or his agents have knowledge of the incident. Confirmation of this notification shall be made in writing as soon as possible, but no later than ten (10) working days from the telephone notification. The written notification shall include pertinent information explaining reasons for the accidental discharge and shall indicate what steps were taken to correct the problem and the date of the incident, as well as what steps are being taken to prevent the problem from recurring. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage or loss to the District or any other damage or loss to person or property; nor shall such notifi- `o cation relieve V.e user of any fines or other liability which may be imposed by this Article or other applicable law. low No t2w -31- i law ARTICLE 5 FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS 501. PRETREATMENT User shall provide wastewater acceptable under the limitations established herein before discharging to any public sewer. Any facilities required to pretreat wastewater shall be provided and maintained at the user' s expense. Detailed plans showing the pretreatment facilities and operating procedures, including accidental discharge procedures, shall be submitted to the District for review. The review and approval of such plans and operating procedures by the District will not relieve the user from the responsibility of modifying the facility in the future as necessary to produce an effluent acceptable to the District under the provisions of this Ordinance. No user shall ever increase the use of water or in any other manner attempt to dilute a discharge as a partial or complete substitute for adequate methods for the reduction of pollutants to achieve compliance with this Ordinance and user' s permit. 501 . 1 Spill Containment A. Each user shall provide spill containment for accidental discharge i of prohibited materials or other wastes regulated by this Ordinance. Such protection will be designed to secure the discharges to prevent them from entering into the system in accordance with reasonable engineering standards. Such facilities will be provided and maintained at the user' s expense. B. If it can be shown that an accidental discharge is the cause of the District violating its discharge requirements, or incurring additional operational expenses, or suffering loss or damage to the facilities, then that discharger may be responsible for any costs or expenses, including assessments by other agencies or the court, incurred by the District. 501 .2 Monitoring/Metering Facilities A. District may require the user to construct and maintain, at its own expense, flow monitoring and/or sampling facilities. B. Any sample taken from a sample box or other representative sampling location is presumed to be discharging to the public sewer. C. Monitoring or metering facilities shall be provided with a security closure that can be locked with a District-provided hasp lock ►� during sampling or monitoring. At all other times, Permittee may keep their facilities secured. -32- w ARTICLE 6 ENFORCEMENT 601 . NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICABLE FEES A. Routine Sampling If routine composite sampling reveals non-compliance by the discharger with the mass emission rates or conditions specified in low the user' s permit, then the user shall pay to the District fees as specified in Tables II and III, pursuant to the provisions in Section 601 (B) and (C) . TABLE II FEES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND MASS EMISSION RATES Do ars Per Pound Per Day in Excess 1W of Limit During and After Routine After ECSA Batch Sampling S & E Expiration Dumps Arsenic $ 100.00 $ 200.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Cadmium 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Chromium (Total ) 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Copper 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Lead 80.00 160.00 240.00 240.00 Mercury 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Nickel 50.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 w' Silver 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Zinc 50.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 Cyanide (Total) 50.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 Cyanide (Free, amenable to chlorination) 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Total Identifiable Chlorinated Hydrocarbons 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 Phenols 50.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 Dissolved Sulfides 50.00 100.00 150.00 150.00 -33- TABLE III FEES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS iw AND MASS EMISSION LIMITS 1 ' Dollars Per Hundred Pounds per Day in Excess of Limit During and Routine After Batch Sampling S & E Dumps B.O.D. $ 15.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Suspended Solids 15.00 30.00 30.00 .L, Oil and Grease (Animal or Vegetable Origin) 200.00 200.00 200.00 Oil and Grease (Mineral or Petroleum Origin) 300.00 400.00 400.00 Total Dissolved Solids 20.00 40.00 40.00 Ammonia 20.00 40.00 40.00 _ it 4a pH Range Flat Fee Per Day* <1.0 $ 125.00 1 ' 1.0 - 2.0 100.00 2.1 - 3.0 75.00 3.1 - 4.0 50.00 4.1 - 5.0 25.00 *pH non-compliance will be based on a grab sample. If an initial grab sample reveals non-compliance, a second grab sample will be taken within a reasonable period of time in the presence of the Permittee. The fees for non-compliance shall be based upon the more severe non-compliance determination. w -34- ►`' i - B. Preliminary Determination of Non-Compliance with Permit Requirements Non-compliance with permit discharge requirements may be determined by an analysis of a grab (for pH only) or composite sample of the effluent of a discharger for any constituent or condition specified in the user' s permit. If the effluent of a user is found by the analysis of the sample to be in excess of the concentrations or b conditions specified in Section 204 or Section 208, routine sampling charges as set forth in Tables II and III shall be levied. A subsequent composite sample will be taken within thirty (30) days, which will also be subject to routine sampling charges if found to be in non-compliance. If the second sample reveals non- compliance, then a Sampling and Evaluation Program may be initiated by the District. C. Sample and Evaluation Program low 1 . If the Sampling and Evaluation ME) Program reveals non- compliance by the permittee with the mass emission rates or conditions specified in the user' s permit, the permittee shall pay the fees as specified in Tables II and III and may be assessed all other costs incurred during the S&E Program for sampling and analysis, including labor, equipment, materials and overhead. The fees specified shall become retroactive to the date the Sampling and Evaluation Program started. The fees for non-compliance shall continue to accumulate for each day sampled. 2. If non-compliance by the permittee with mass emission rates or conditions as specified in the user' s permit is determined, the District' s Chief Engineer may proceed with one of the following: a) Amend the existing permit through an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA). This may be done after consultation with the permittee and when the discharger has shown good faith in trying to comply but requires additional time for construction and/or acquisition of equipment related to pretreatment. The permit may be amended with the ECSA for a period of up to 180 days, however, this period may be extended for a period not to exceed an additional 180 days upon determination by the Chief Engineer that good cause exists for an additional period. No further extensions shall be granted except upon ' approval of the Board of Directors. Any condition of the ESCA not acceptable to the Permittee may be appealed under the provisions of Section 601 .8 of this Ordinance. _ b) If corrective action is not taken within a reasonable time after completion of the Sampling and Evaluation Program and notification to the Permittee of the expiration of the ECSA and the discharger is still not in compliance, then a Cease and Desist order may be issued. -35- �r c) Commence enforcement action as outlined in this Article. The payment of non-compliance fees will not bar the District from undertaking enforcement procedures as specified in Article 6. 601 .1 Non-Compliance with Permit Requirements (Wastehauler) 1 ' A. Non-compliance with permit requirements shall be determined by an anaylsis of a grab sample of the effluent for any constitutent or condition specified in the user's permit. If the effluent of a user 1 is found by the analysis to be in excess of the concentrations or conditions specified in the user' s permit and it can be proven to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer to be of septic tank/cesspool or non-industrial origin, the following shall apply: 1 . First violation and all subsequent violations - wastehauler shall identify, in writing, the source of the discharge. 2. Second violation - permittee' s disposal privileges shall be suspended for five (5) days. 3. Third violation - permittee shall pay a non-compliance fee of $250.00 and the permit for disposal privileges shall be suspended for ten (10) days. 4. Fourth violation - the permit shall be revoked. B. For those wastehaulers discharging liquids from industrial sources, the following shall apply: 1 . First violation - permittee shall pay a non-compliance fee of $250.00. 2. Second violation - permittee shall pay a non-compliance fee of $375.00 and the permit shall be revoked. 601 .2 Damage to Facilities or Interruption of Normal Operations A. When a discharge of wastes causes an obstruction, damage or any other impairment to District' s operation of facilities, the k ► District may assess a charge against the discharger for the work required to clean or repair the facility or costs incurred to resume normal operations. A service fee of twenty-five percent (25%) of District' s costs shall be added to these charges. The total amount shall be payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. B. If it can be shown that the discharge is the cause of the District violating its discharge requirements or incurring additional expenses or suffering loss or damage to the facilities, then that ke -36- 1 V discharger shall be responsible for any costs or expenses, including assessments by other agencies or the court, incurred by the District. 601 .3 Revocation of Permits VIM A. Any of the following is reason for permit revocation: 1 . A person knowingly giving false statements, representation, record, report, plan or other document to the District or falsifing, tampering or knowingly rendering inaccurate any monitoring device or method required under this Ordinance. 2. Failure of the user to report significant changes in operations low or wastewater constituents and characteristics. 3. Refusal of reasonable access to the user' s premises for the purpose of inspection or monitoring. 4. Violation of the permit requirements or conditions and/or violations of this Ordinance. 5. Failure to pay fees and charges for use established pursuant to this Ordinance. B. When the General Manager or his designated representative has reason to believe that any grounds as enumerated in subsection A above exists for the revocation of a permit, he shall give written notice thereof to the permittee. Said notice shall set forth the time and place where the charges shall be heard by the General Manager or by such person as may be designated by the General Manager. The hearing date shall not be less than fifteen (15) days from the mailing of such notice by certified mail to the permittee as shown on the permit. At the hearing, the permittee shall have an opportunity to respond to the allegations set forth in the notice. C. After the hearing, the General Manager, or his designee, shall make his determination and should he find grounds exist for the revoca- tion of the permittee's permit, he shall have the right to revoke that permit. If the General Manager determines to not order revo- cation of the permit, he may recommend to the Board of Directors that the permit be revoked after hearing held by the Board. In such event, the General Manager shall immediately refer the matter to the Board without need for permittee to appeal per Section 601 .8. The decision shall be reduced to writing within thirty (30) days after submission of the cause by the parties thereto, and shall contain a brief statement of facts found to be true, the determina- tion of the issues presented, findings and the order of the General Manager or other person sitting as hearing officer. A copy shall be mailed or delivered to the permittee or his legal counsel . �, -37- D. The determination of the General Manager or his designee shall be final in all respects fifteen (15) days after mailing his decision to permittee; provided, however, if reconsideration or appeal to the Board of Directors is sought by permittee pursuant to Section 601 .8, the decision is final on the date that reconsideration is decided or the decision is rendered by the Board of Directors. E. The revocation hearing shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the General Manager and approved by the District' s legal counsel . F. Judicial review of any decision of the Board of Directors may be iP,c made pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure only if the Petition for Writ of Mandate is filed not later than the ninetieth (90th) day following the date on which the decision becomes final . 601 .4 Batch Dumps When the District finds a user has willfully discharged concentrated non-compatible pollutants in a manner or method that is not approved by District, non-compliance fees will be applicable as shown on Tables II and III. 601 .5 Enforcement Provisions The District can require compliance with permit conditions or limita- tions by issuing administrative orders that are enforceable in a court of law or by directly seeking court action. 69 601 .6 Administrative Orders A. Cease and Desist Orders When the District finds that a discharge of wastewater has taken place in violation of prohibitions or limitations of this Ordinance or the provisions of a wastewater discharge permit, the General Manager may issue a Cease and Desist Order and direct that those persons not complying with such prohibitions, limitations, require- ments or provisions: 1 . Cease discharge immediately; or 2. Comply immediately; or 3. Comply in accordance with a time schedule set forth by the .l.l District. -38- B. Public Nuisance Discharges of wastewater in any manner in violation of this Ordinance or of any order issued by the General Manager as authorized by this Ordinance are hereby declared a public nuisance and shall be corrected or abated as directed by the General Manager. Any person creating a public nuisance is guilty of a misdemeanor. C. Termination of Service The District may revoke any wastewater discharge permit or terminate sewerage service to any premise if the permittee is in violation of any provision of this Ordinance. All costs for terminating service shall be paid by the permittee; all costs for reinstituting service shall be paid by the permittee. D. Harmful Contributions •� The District may suspend sewerge service when such suspension is necessary, in the opinion of the General Manager, in order to stop an actual discharge which presents or may present an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons, to the environment, causes interference to the District' s sewerage facilities, or causes the District to violate any State or Federal law or regulation. 601 .7 Civil Action a A. Injunction Whenever a discharge of wastewater is in violation of the provisions of this Ordinance, the District may petition the Superior Court for the issuance of a preliminary or permanent injunction, or both, as may be appropriate in restraining the continuance of such discharge. B. Civil Penalties Any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance or permit condition, or who violates any Cease and Desist Order, prohibition or effluent limitation, shall be liable civilly for a penalty not to exceed $6,000 for each day in which such violation occurs. The legal counsel of the District, upon order of the District' s Board of Directors, shall petition the Superior Court to impose, assess and recover such penalties. C. Criminal Penalties Any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance or permit condition, or who violates any Cease and Desist Order, prohibition VVII or effluent limitation, is guilty of a misdemeanor, which upon -39- conviction is punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500) , or imprisonment for not more than six (6) months in , the County Jail , or both. Each day in violation may constitute a new and separate violation and shall be subject to the penalties contained herein. 601 .8 Appeals A. Any user, permit applicant or permit holder affected by any decision, action or determination made by the General Manager, interpreting or implementing the provisions of this Ordinance or in any permit issued herein, may file with the General Manager a written request for reconsideration within fifteen (15) days setting forth in detail the facts supporting the user's request for reconsideration. Such facts must include a statement listing newly discovered relevant facts that were not known or available to the user at the date of the hearing. The General Manager shall render a decision on the request for reconsideration to the user, permit applicant or permit holder in writing within (15) days of receipt of request. If the ruling on the request for recon- sideration made by the General Manager is unacceptable, the person jam, requesting reconsideration may, within ten ( 10) days after the date of notification of the General Manager' s action, file a written appeal to the Board. B. A fee of $100 shall accompany any appeal to the Board of Directors of the District. This fee may, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, be refunded if the final appeal ruling is in favor of the appellant. C. The written appeal shall be heard by the District' s Board of Directors within forty-five .(45) days from the date of filing. The District' s Board of Directors shall make a final ruling on the appeal within sixty (60) days from the date of filing. 601 .9 Payment of Charges and Delinquencies A. Except as otherwise provided, all fees, charges and penalties made pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance are due and payable upon receipt of notice thereof. All such amounts shall become +�► delinquent forty-five (45) days after date of invoice. B. Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a penalty in accordance with the following: 1 . Forty-six (46) days after date of invoice, a penalty of ten percent ( 10%) of the base invoice amount, not to exceed a maximum of $1 ,000.00. -40- �,,, L 2. Ninety (90) days after date of invoice, 1 penalty of ten percent (10%) of the base invoice amount, not to exceed a maximum of $A,000.00. 3. T C. Any invoice outstanding and unpaid after ninety (90) days shall be cause for immediate initiation of permit revocation proceedings. D. Penalties charged under this Section shall not accrue to those invoices successfully appealed, provided the District receives written notification of said appeal prior to the payment due date. Payment of disputed charges is still required during District review of any appeals submitted by permittees. 601 .10 Collection Collection of delinquent accounts shall be in accordance with Policy Resolution Establishing Procedures for Collection of Delinquent Obligations Owing to the Districts, as amended from time-to-time by the Board of Directors. Any such action for collection may include an apli- cation for an injunction to prevent repeated and recurring violations of this Ordinance. 602 REINSTATEMENT DEPOSIT Permittees that have been subject to enforcement proceedings may be required to deposit with the Districts an amount determined by the General Manager before permission is granted for further discharge to the sewer. two -41- ARTICLE 7 CONNECTION PERMITS tO 701 . INTRODUCTION - ALL DISTRICTS A. Connection permits may be required of dwelling units, buildings �_J and developments connecting directly or indirectly to District's sewerage facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities and the connection of �; local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to District's facilities. i B. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. C. There will be no connection charges assessed to local governing agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to District' s sewerage facilities; however, a connection permit must be obtained. D. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the Li sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. E. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the Building Department of each City within the District. F. At the end of two years from the effective date of this Ordinance, i and every two years thereafter, the Board of Directors shall review iW the charges established by this Article and if in its judgment such charges require modification, an amendment to this Ordinance will be adopted establishing such modification. i -42- u ao 702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CONNECTION CHARGES There are no connection charges currently in effect in District No. 1 . `0 702. DISTRICT NO. 2 CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. A. Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $220 per dwelling unit. B. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection 40 charge shall be $220 per dwelling unit. C. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $45 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction_ shall _be. $220.. D. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the '� former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. .GO E. Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $220 for each dwelling "` unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $45 per 1 ,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construc- tion, provided such new construction shall contain additional fix- ture units. Mai -43- 702• DISTRICT NO. 3 CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. A. Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. B. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. C. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $50 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $250. D. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. E. Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling �+ buildings, the connection charge shall be $250 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $50 per 1 ,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construc- tion, provided such new construction shall contain additional fix- ture units. -44- i.,. i W 702. DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTION CHARGES A. The District is divided into three (3) separate zones for purposes .of development and regulation of sewage facility use. Said zones are established as follows: Zone 1 : All that territory within the District exclusive of that territory within Zones 2 and 3. Zone 2: All that certain territory described as the Big Canyon-Jamboree Road Drainage Area. bo Zone 3: All that certain territory described as the Newport South Coastal Area. The precise boundaries of each of the above zones are on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and are incorporated herein by reference. B. District Connection Charges. Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein: Lad 1 . For each new dwelling building constructed, the connection charges shall be: Zone 1 - $250.00 per dwelling unit. Zone 2 - $850.00 per dwelling unit. Zone 3 - $1 ,250.00 per dwelling unit. 2. For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charges shall be: Zone 1 - $130.00 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $130.00. Me Zone 2 - $440.00 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $440.00. ftVL Zone 3 - $2,000.00 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $2,000.00. 3. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (1 ) and (2) above. If such replacement .� -45- .d i. construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such ,, charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable for the new construction of the building demolished or destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge. 4. In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling �+ buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs ( 1 ) and (2) above for each dwelling unit added or created or each 1 ,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided that new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 5. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer i-W connection charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of, or prior to, the issuance of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the District. rrrr i �.l -46- L..i 702. DISTRICT NO. 6 CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. (1 ) Regular Connection Charge, Residential Uses: $500.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Regular Connection Charge, Commercial or Industrial . Establishments - $100.00 per 1 ,000 square feet of improvements, provided that such charge shall not be less than $500.00. The term "commercial or industrial establishments" as used herein shall include motels, hotels and property owned or occupied by governmental agencies and non-profit organizations. .,� 702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. A. Connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit .constructed, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. B. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $250 per dwelling unit. C. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $50 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $250. D. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. -47- E. Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $250 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than dwelling buildings, it shall be $50 per 1 ,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. F. Trunk connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less than $400.00 plus the applicable regular con- nection charge for dwelling units hereinabove specified. G. Connection charge, offsite sewers not a part of Master Plan rela- tive to reimbursement agreements : r� The charges for connections to offsite sewers which are not included as a part of the District Master Plan and for which a L; Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shall be in the amount provided for in said Agreement. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended or has expired. These connec- tion charges shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to said facilities. �. H. Trunk connection charge, commercial or industrial establishments: $10.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and con- necting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than $500.00 plus the applicable regular connection charge for new construction and existing structures other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified. I. Assessment District connection charge: W The regular connection charges provided in the preceding subsections of this Article, plus a sum of money equal to the assessment L charge without interest, or Treasurer's charge which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are located had said real property been assessed within the Assessment District which constructed or acquired the Assessment District sewer to which connection is made. L.r -48- �..+ a+ 702. DISTRICT NO. 11 CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein. A. Connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1 ,250 per dwelling unit. B. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $1 ,250 per dwelling unit. C. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $250 per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1 ,250. D. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. E. Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $1 ,250 for each �+ dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $250 per 1 ,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. °" -49- i �.d ARTICLE 8 SEVERABILITY 801 . SEVERABILITY If any provision of these regulations or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of the regulations or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. ARTICLE 9 REPEAL 901 . REPEAL The following Ordinances are hereby repealed on the effective date hereof and all Ordinance or parts of Ordinances inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance: District No. 1 - Ordinance No. 103 District No. 2 - Ordinance No. 204 District No. 3 - Ordinance No. 305 District No. 5 - Ordinance Nos. 508 and 510 w District No. 6 - Ordinance Nos. 603 and 605 District No. 7 - Ordinance Nos. 716 and 717 District No. 11 - Ordinance Nos. 1103 and 1105 �r ji ARTICLE 10 EFFECTIVE DATE 1001 . EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this Ordinance shall be July 1 , 1983. i ' -50- �' AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (1) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS April 27, 1983 of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 812 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 STAFF REPORT (714)540.2910 (71 a)962.2411 Construction of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3 The Agenda for CSD No. 11 includes a request for approval of Change Order No. 5 to Contract No. 11-13-3, the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer, between Lake Street and Golden West Street. Change Order No. 1 consisted of a no cost time extension while Change Orders Nos. 2, through 5 are additive costs for work changes totalling approximately $152,000. By far, the largest change in work has been the discovery of oil field utilities within the street. To date, nearly 200 lines not shown on the plans have been encountered. Protection or removal of these lines slows job production and requires extra time and effort on the part of the contractor for which he is entitled to compensation under Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, Extra Work. A similar problem has been the repair of an electrical conduit which electrifies the City of Huntington Beach's street lights. This line has been found at various locations within the paved street section of Walnut Avenue; in fact, the line is frequently encased within the asphalt itself. This conduit is part of a series electrical grid and immediate repair has been requested by City staff. Where the lighting conduit was not shown on the plans it is, again, extra work in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions. - A third problem has been the poor subbase encountered within Walnut Avenue. In order to insure that the new street is structurally sound, the contractor was directed to remove the poor subbase, all at extra cost. The plans and specifications, as approved by the City of Huntington Beach, pro- vided that the contractor replace the entire street section but did not include street grade information. Between Lake Street and Main Street it was decided to grade the streets in accordance with the existing drainage patterns, and provide a cross slope of 2 percent from crown to gutter. Between Main Street and 7th Street the subbase and base coarses were also graded in this configuration. After the pavement was installed, several rain storms occurred and flooded the newly paved areas due to poor hydraulic performance of the half circle storm drains. City staff has requested reworking of Walnut Avenue between Lake Street and 7th Street so that the flooding problem would be alleviated. This rework has also resulted in extra charges for the District. The original price bid for the construction was $3,040,523. It is anticipated that approximately $250,000 in Extra Work charges will be incurred because of the changed conditions and extra work. It is also anticipated that the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities will provide a deduction of approximately $40,000 because of changes in quantities. Therefore, the final contract price will be approximately $3,250,000, a net increase of 7 percent over the bid v,pJ contract amount. This may be compared to the Engineer's estimate of $3,900,000. w 44 it` i f ►1 �' ! 7' W LL LLJ co ZVI "IN ' VJ s a, IC 0 r r ✓ s • �� m1w CIV lk 410 r / ��t r• u r.l✓ 1, AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (1) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS April 27, 1983 of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA92708 STAFF REPORT (714)54a2910 (714)962-2411 Construction of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3 The Agenda for CSD No. 11 includes a request for approval of Change Order No. 5 to Contract No. 11-13-3, the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer, between Lake Street and Golden West Street. Change Order No. 1 consisted of a no cost time extension while Change Orders Nos. 2, through 5 are additive costs for work changes totalling approximately $152,000. By far, the largest change in work has been the discovery of oil field utilities within the street. To date, nearly 200 lines not shown on the plans have been encountered. Protection or removal of these lines slows job production and requires extra time and effort on the part of the contractor for which he is entitled to compensation under Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, Extra Work. A similar problem has been the repair of an electrical conduit which electrifies the City of Huntington Beach's street lights. This line has been found at various locations within the paved street section of Walnut Avenue; in fact, the line is frequently encased within the asphalt itself. This conduit is part of a series electrical grid and immediate repair has been requested by City staff. yard Where the lighting conduit was not shown on the plans it is, again, extra work in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions. A third problem has been the poor subbase encountered within Walnut Avenue. In order to insure that the new street is structurally sound, the contractor was directed to remove the poor subbase, all at extra cost. The plans and specifications, as approved by the City of Huntington Beach, pro- vided that the contractor replace the entire street section but did not include street grade information. Between Lake Street and Main Street it was decided to grade the streets in accordance with the existing drainage patterns, and provide a cross slope of 2 percent from crown to gutter. Between Main Street and 7th Street the subbase and base coarses were also graded in this configuration. After the pavement was installed, several rain storms occurred and flooded the newly paved areas due to poor hydraulic performance of the half circle storm drains. City staff has requested reworking of Walnut Avenue between Lake Street and 7th Street so that the flooding problem would be alleviated. This rework has also resulted in extra charges for the District. The original price bid for the construction was $3,040,523. It is anticipated that approximately $250,000 in Extra Work charges will be incurred because of the changed conditions and extra work. It is also anticipated that the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities will provide a deduction of approximately $40,000 because of changes in quantities. Therefore, the final contract price will be approximately $3,250,000, a net increase of 7 percent over the bid ,,� contract amount. This may be compared to the Engineer's estimate of $3,900,000. Oq LL LLJ LL ..how IF4 LLI Cl) it, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORN[A P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 a)540-2910 April 29 , 1983 (714)962-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE April 27 , 1983 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Others present: Donald A. Holt, Jr . , Joint Chairman Director Carol Kawanami Robert Hanson Director Robert Luxembourger Henry Wedaa Director Don Smith Bruce Finlayson Thomas L. Woodruff, General Evelyn Hart Counsel Elvin Hutchison Harvey Hunt, Carollo Engineers Richard Edgar Walt Howard, Carollo Engineers Ruth Bailey Bill Knopf, Carollo Engineers Absent: Staff Present: Vice Joint Chairman Ron Pattinson Fred A. Harper , General Manager Supervisor Thomas F. Riley J. Wayne Sylvester , Assistant General Manager Convene: 5 : 30 p.m. Ray E. Lewis , Chief Engineer Adjourn: 7: 25 p.m. 1. Status Report on Consolidation Study. The Joint Chairman and the Chairmen of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts updated the Executive Committee on the status of the study of consolidating the present seven Districts into a single District. Staff has been directed to prepare a report outlining the financial, administrative and other issues that must be addressed by the Directors in considering consolidation. The Committees will be submitting their findings and recommendations to the Executive Committee in the near future. 2. Fiscal Policy Committee Items. The staff reported on the following items scheduled to be considered by the Fiscal Policy Committee the next day and requested authorization to place them on the May llth Joint Board Agenda if approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee. a. Plant No. 2 Participation in the Southern California Energy Coalition. Last year the Boards authorized membership for Plant No. 1 in the Southern California Energy Coalition. By participating in this energy-management program which includes several major electrical users in the area, the Districts receive rebates on electrical costs as a result of our commitment to shed electrical load at peak periods when requested by the Edison Company through the Coalition. Treatment Plant No. 1 is presently realizing an annual savings of approximately $20 , 000 . Staff is now requesting authorization to add Plant No. 2 as a member . From our evaluation we project an annual rebate for Plant No. 2 of $65, 000 . The one-time enrollment cost is as follows: Membership Fee: $ -0- Engineering Service Fee 5, 120 Hardware 8, 132 TOTAL $13, 252 The usual $2, 000 membership fee is waived because Plant No. 1 is already in the system. If Plant No. 2 is connected to the system by June, it would maximize our rebate for 1983-84 because of the high peak energy demands of the summer months. b. Summer Work Program. In 1982 , the Boards approved a trial summer work program that employed local young people (mostly students) to help on backlogged building, piping and equipment painting , tunnel maintenance and additional groundskeeping that is necessary during the summer months. The program proved very successful and staff is recommending authorization for the 1983 summer . The program provides for a temporary salary upgrade (5. 5%) for our full-time painters and groundskeepers to serve as crew leaders. Each crew leader runs a 5-7 person team to perform the various levels of required work. The work is accomplished by hiring up to thirty temporary employees for painting and ten for groundskeeping at $5. 00 per hour . These employees are not eligible for fringe benefits. Anticipated cost from June loth through September 29th is as follows: -2- Painting and Tunnel Maintenance Salaries and Wages $103, 000 Materials and Supplies 32, 000 SUB-TOTAL $135 ,000 Groundskeeping Salaries and Wages $ 34 , 000 Materials and Supplies 3, 000 SUB-TOTAL $ 37, 000 TOTAL $172, 000 It would be desirable to obtain Board authorization as soon as possible to allow sufficient time to recruit candidates to start work in early June. The Executive Committee authorized the items to be placed on the May llth Joint Board meeting agenda if approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Committee also asked staff to prepare an appropriate form of recognition for the contributions of the summer work program and its participants. NOTE: At their meeting on April 28th the Fiscal Policy Committee considered the above items and recommends approval. 3. Revised Industrial Waste Ordinance. The Chief Engineer reported that the staff had held three meetings with the ad hoc committee representing the industrial community to review the proposed revisions to the Districts ' Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of Districts ' Sewerage Facilities. Many of the ad hoc group' s suggestions have been incorporated into the ordinance. The ordinance modifications include changes to the discharge limitation, non-compliance fees, enforcement procedures and adds EPA' s required categorical pretreatment standards. Also included is a new excess capacity capital charge provision for new permittees that will place a significant demand on the Districts ' system, and existing permittees that substantially expand their operation and thus increase their system loading. The amount would be determined by the Board of Directors on a case-by-case basis. The Committee discussed this new fee and concurs with the concept that dischargers that are high users be required to pay their fair share of the added capital cost to provide service capacity. The Boards have set May llth to conduct a public hearing on the ordinance with consideration of final adoption scheduled for June 1st. -3- s 4 . Senate Bill 270 . The General Counsel reported on SB 270 which would exempt water agencies from Air Quality Management District permit requirements. He observed that in view of the fact, the South Coast AQMD had recently advised our staff that the Districts are subject to the imposition of equipment permit fees that staff estimates may cost as much as $80 , 000, it might be appropriate to urge the California Association of Sanitation Agencies to support an amendment to the bill to also exempt wastewater agencies. The Committee instructed the General Counsel to request CASA to support such an amendment at its next meeting on May 6th and 7th. 5. California Ocean Plan Amendment Hearings. Joint Chairman Holt briefed the Committee on his testimony at the April 21st hearing on proposed amendments to the California Ocean Plan conducted by the State Water Resources Control Board. He observed that the hearing was very positive and noted that the SWRCB complimented the Districts on our presentation. 6 . Authorizing General Manager ' s participation in an American Wastewater Technology Delegation to China. The Districts ' General Manager has been invited to participate in a People-to-People Wastewater Technology Delegation to the Republic of China this fall. The selected American delegates will participate in a bilateral technical exchange with Chinese environmental scientists and wastewater specialists. Following a two-day briefing in Seattle, Washington, the delegation will visit six cities in China to meet with government personnel responsible for the management and treatment of China ' s municipal and industrial wastewater . The group will be traveling on official visas, rather than tourist visas , to provide access to several cities and organizations which are closed to most foreigners. The Executive Committee recommends that the General Manager be authorized to participate as a member of the American delegation. The estimated cost per delegate is $4500 (departing from and returning to Seattle) . 7. Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities. Bill Knopf of John Carollo Engineers, engaged by the Boards to update the Joint Works Master Plan of Treatment and Disposal Facilities, reviewed the conclusions of their master plan study to Committee members (see enclosed Executive Summary) . -4- Recent projects completed by the Districts have mainly been directed at providing more secondary treatment capability for wastewaters which enter the Joint Treatment Works. Although necessary, these projects have directed large sums of capital into facilities that will improve effluent quality but do not increase treatment capacity. Additional primary treatment capacity and hydraulic capabilities will be needed in the next 5 years. Of the estimated $94, 800 , 000 worth of improvements needed, approximately $49 , 300 , 000 will be necessary for just two items; a new outfall booster pump station at Treatment Plant No. 2 and a new headworks for Reclamation Plant No. 1. Both projects are needed to increase the hydraulic capacity in the system, although the Reclamation Plant No. 1 headworks is also needed to increase primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. Except for certain projects designed to improve energy efficiency, the 5-year program is mainly directed at primary treatment and hydraulic capacity improvements. -5- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY Masterplan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities t AZT AT10 84'SANTA ANA RIVER P 11tA1I N� ' DISTRICT z ��a�4L<ovo o,4�Pls� 48' SANTA ANAN -- SI'NE WNOPE-►LACENTIA DISTRICT I DISTRICT 2 O U 42' EUCLID- DISTRICT 2 39D I STRICTE6 TRUNK -' 84'SUN FLOWER-DISTRICTS 107 STRICTURE O•'r slnee 106, tS� L-, O 9NGECOO v• 64'INTERPLANT ' CONNIVE O CONNECTION 66'INTERPLANT OO, DISTRICTS 42N DISTRICTS 306 INTER►LAMT K)d D `. 66• PLANT 1 64. FORCELMAIINE 1�' r4Y� IZO. OU�E4C( f6'KN0, INTERCEPTOR C1 0 )6 00TF DISTRICTS 3 s II` !6'INTERPLANT INTERCEPTOR 4CL \+ A O m ELLIS AV E.PUN PING STATION 'N'MAGNOLIA-BUSHARD INTERCEPTOR DISTRICTS 28 3 O I NI lO Te MILLER-HOLDER INTERCEPTOR DISTRICTS 3611 PLANT 2 OEO 84'COAST TRUNK SEWER DISTRICT II APRIL 1983 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS PHOENIX.AZ • WALNUT CREEK,CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CA • VISALIA:CA TUCSON.AZ e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IrW MASTER PLAN FOR JOINT WORKS WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS rr OF ORANGE COUNTY rr JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS PMOENDI AZ • WALNUT CREEK,CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CA • VISALM CA TUCSON,AZ I� ww CONTENTS SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 `r INTRODUCTION 3 EXISTING SITUATION 4 �.+ Reclamation Plant No. 1 6 Treatment Plant No. 2 6 Interplant System 7 Joint Use Facilities 10 EXISTING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 11 Discharge Requirements 11 Analysis of Existing System 11 PROJECTED SITUATION 14 Wastewater Flow and Strength 14 Discharge Requirements 17 FACILITY NEEDS 18 `r Reclamation Plant No. 1 19 Immediate Facility Needs 19 Treatment Plant No. 2 22 Immediate Facility Needs 22 Interplant System 23 Immediate Facility Needs 23 Ocean Outfall System 23 y Immediate Facility Needs 25 EXPANDED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY 25 KEY FINDINGS 27 ESTIMATED COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION 28 .r rr i u FIGURES I ' V 1 Joint Treatment Works Schematic 5 2 Aerial Photograph Reclamation Plant No. 1 8 3 Aerial Photograph Treatment Plant No. 2 9 4 Analysis of Existing System During 1981-82 12 5 Projected Average Daily Flow to Joint Works 15 6 Projected Average Daily Flow to Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 16 7 Proposed Facility Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1 u Laid Out for Rectangular Clarifiers 20 8 Proposed Facility Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1 �+ Laid Out for Circular Clarifiers 21 9 Proposed Facility Additions at Treatment Plant No. 2 24 10 Analysis of System Following Recommended Project, 1987-88 26 11 Implementation Schedule for Recommended Projects 30 ILJI u TABLES 1 Summary of Overall 5 Year Facility Needs 29 u u u u U u u ii u u 0 .. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS This report describes treatment and disposal facility additions that will `r be needed at the Joint Treatment Works of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) in the next five years. The report has been prepared to update previous planning documents in accordance with the Districts current planning policy. Unlike previous reports that have been prepared, Federal funding is not likely to be available for the projects outlined herein. As a result, it will be necessary for the Sanitation Districts to plan for funding projected facility needs from local sources. Recent projects completed by CSDOC have mainly been directed at providing WW more secondary treatment capability for wastewaters which enter the Joint Treatment Works. Although necessary, these projects have directed large sums of capital into facilities that will improve effluent quality but do not increase treatment capacity. In 1981-82, the Joint Treatment Works, which have a combined nominal design treatment capacity of 184 MGD, treated an average daily flow of 221 v MGD. In the same year, the system also handled a peak flow in excess of 400 ,r MGD even though the nominal hydraulic design capacity is limited to only 350 MGD. The systems ability to perform adequately under these circumstances is "' the result of stressing the system beyond normal operating limits, favorable operating conditions and efficient operation and maintenance performed by the MW Districts' staff. MW Additional primary treatment capacity and hydraulic capabilities will be needed in the next 5 years. Of the estimated $94,800,000 worth of improve- + ments needed, approximately $49,300,000 will be necessary for just two items; a new outfall booster pump station at Treatment Plant No. 2 and a new head- Mmi works for Reclamation Plant No. 1. Both items are needed to increase the .r 1 WW u hydraulic capacity in the system, although the Reclamation Plant No. 1 head- u works is also needed to increase primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. I � Except for certain projects designed to improve energy efficiency, the 5 year u program is mainly directed at primary treatment and hydraulic capacity u improvements. Recently, successful efforts by the Districts' staff to have proposed discharge requirements reduced from full secondary treatment has u delayed improved treatment needs. At concentrations stipulated in the Districts Ocean Waiver, existing improved treatment capabilities may be adequate for another five years, however, they may be inadequate at the level II of operation anticipated. {� U u u . u u u u u u u u 2 u r INTRODUCTION In fiscal year 1981-82, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County "r (CSDOC) treated and disposed of an average of 221 million gallons of waste- water each day. This represents an increase of approximately 20 percent over .r the average daily flow of 185 million gallons per day (MGD) five years ago (1977-78). The increase is due in part to the acceptance of wastewater flows from the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed (SAWPA) beginning early in 1982, however, the bulk of the increased flow originated from population growth within the 330 square mile service area of the CSDOC. WW Although the Sanitation Districts have continued an aggressive capital improvement program during the past five years, the nearly $80,000,000 of bw construction currently in progress has been primarily directed at providing an MW improved treatment capability rather than expansion. Despite the minimal expansion efforts and increased flows during the past five years, however, the Districts have been successful in meeting their current discharge requirements with existing facilities. The ability of the existing Joint Treatment Works to meet discharge requirements while operating in excess of rated capacity is the result of superior operation and maintenance, decreased sewage strength, an overall decrease in the reliability of the system (encroachment into stand- by capacity) and favorable circumstances such as moderate winter storms. As flows increase and the requirements for discharge become more stringent, the successful performance of the existing Joint Works treatment system will become progressively less likely unless plant expansion occurs. The object of this report is to outline the additional facilities that will be required to handle future flow increases and to meet anticipated future discharge requirements. While facility needs for a period of twenty years into the future have been examined, the main effort was concentrated on 3 u immediate facility needs or those that will be required in the next five u years. �I u EXISTING SITUATION The Joint Treatment Works are shown schematically in Figure 1 and consist of Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 located in Huntington Beach, various interplant facilities to transfer flows between the two plants and an ocean outfall system. Following completion of u expansion projects now under construction the rated design capacity of the Joint Works will be increased from 184 MGD to 208 MGD. Peak influent pumping u capabilities will also be increased from the current 376 MGD capacity to a u capacity of 421 MGD following completion of the Hydraulic Reliability project at Treatment Plant No. 2. The current rated design capacity considering projects now under con- struction still will not match the current average daily flow of 221 MGD. In u addition, expanded influent pumping capabilities could exceed the capacity of the outfall pumping system by as much as 70 MGD depending on tide condi - tions. Of the two deficiencies, the outfall pumping limitations are of great- est concern. The existing systems ability to absorb deficiencies in treatment L� capacity is expected to continue in the immediate future because of the amount of secondary capacity now available in the system. However, outfall pumping - system deficiencies cannot be absorbed. Serious difficulties in outfall u pumping have only been prevented by favorable operating conditions and moder- ate winter storms. Various components of the Joint Treatment Works, the discharge require- u ments they currently operate under and their current adequacy are discussed below. u u 4 u 84 r5lin NEWHOPE—PLACENTIA RI' DISTRICT 2 42" EUCLID—DISTRICT 2 84" SUNFLOWER— DISTRICTS 1&7 D VERSH NO SCALE ow TI RUC1 .r r No mi 78" DIVERSION S 5&6 CONNECTION ow ow ow �O� '2Dp OV TFAL Tge C ow 96" KNOTT INTERCEPTOR OUTF At DISTRICTS 3&1 1 54" MA DIST JOINT TREATMENT WORKS SCHEMATIC COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE I JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. An aerial photograph of Reclamation Plant No. 1, is shown in Figure 2. The facility currently treats about 27 percent (60 MGD) of the 221 MGD of wastewater now received at the Joint Works. Although Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a design capacity of 46 MGD, second- ary treatment capabilities at the plant and the encroachment on standby capa- city now allow it to treat up to 60 MGD. Secondary capacity in excess of 46 MGD has been realized due to changes in operation of certain tributary indus- tries and an active source control program by the Districts. The operational changes and source control has resulted in a reduction of influent wastewater u strength. However, based on past history this trend could reverse. The 20 MGD trickling filter plant can now be operated in parallel with the 46 MGD activated sludge plant with a resultant 66 MGD of improved treat- ment capacity. The availability of improved treatment downstream of the original 46 MGD primary treatment facility and operating the primary plant `r with no standby allows treating more flow at a higher loading rate. If one of the large clarifiers had to be taken out of service at a flow of 60 MGD, loading rates would increase to a level that might affect performance. Hydraulically, Reclamation Plant No. 1 is limited by headworks capacity to a peak flow rate of 100 MGD. This pumping capacity is more than sufficient WW for a treatment capacity of 46 MGD, but is inadequate for average daily flows of 60 MGD. The hydraulic capacity of the plant should be roughly twice the WW average treatment capacity based on peak flow rates that have been observed in the past. As wastewater flows increase, additional hydraulic capacity, primary r.r treatment capacity and solids handling facilities must be added to handle the increased wastewater flows. `r TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. Figure 3 is an aerial photograph of Treatment Plant No. 2. Treatment Plant No. 2 currently provides primary treatment for 6 u - L.J an average flow of 161 MGD although its rated design capacity is only 138 U MGD. Construction is currently underway for addition of primary clarifiers N and 0 (see Figure 3). When this project is complete, the Plant No. 2 primary treatment design capacity will be increased to 162 MGD. The lower strength wastewater now being treated at the Joint Works has LI the same effect on solids handling capacity at Treatment Plant No. 2 as it did J at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The effect at Plant No. 1 with regard to primary capacity, was the ability to treat greater volumes of flow without additional solids handling capabilities. This is the reason that Clarifiers N and 0 can v be added at Treatment Plant No. 2 without supplementing digester capacity. Digester and dewatering capability at Treatment Plant No. 2 is adequate for the anticipated ultimate treatment capacity of 175 MGD at Treatment Plant No. 2. u Partial secondary treatment capabilities will be available at Treatment Plant No. 2 in the very near future. This capability will be provided by the new 75 MGD pure oxygen activated sludge facility now nearing completion. � { Therefore, Treatment Plant No. 2 can be considered a 162 MGD treatment plant �I with improved treatment capabilities of 75 MGD. u Treatment Plant No. 2 headworks pumping capabilities limit its peak flow II- capacity to 276 MGD, however, construction will soon begin on a project to expand peak pumping capabilities to 321 MGD. With observed peak flow rates � I that approach twice the average flow rate, the expanded capabilities should be �J sufficient for flows currently handled at Plant No. 2. INTERPLANT SYSTEM. The interplant system consists of the metering and diversion structure, the 78/96-inch influent wastewater diversion system and u the 66 and 84-inch interplant effluent lines that carry Reclamation Plant No. 1 effluent to the outfall system at Treatment Plant No. 2 (see Figure 1). u 7 p ;�� �_ i • LL 4 i cc�,;-ti r •, 1. 1 (, 1!� — Ir {{ � t yX `6 - � x I J � Fps r� ' S ' V " t BUSNAR N 0 10. :00 ' ,PHOTOGRAPHED MAY 12. 1882 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH TREATMENT PLANT No. 2 FIGURE 3 ur Wastewater flows tributary to the metering and diversion structure (located at Reclamation Plant No. 1) are metered as they enter and are either discharged to Reclamation Plant No. 1 or diverted to Treatment Plant No. 2. The capacities of the six interceptors that currently enter the metering and rr diversion structure total 391 MGD, however, all of the interceptors do not ,r normally operate at their maximum capacities. Discharges to Reclamation Plant No. 1 are limited to the capacity of the Plant No. I headworks (100 MGD) and diversions to Plant No. 2 are limited to the surcharged capacity of 110 MGD that is available in the 78/96-inch interplant diversions system. Flows tributary to the metering and diversion structure are therefore limited by downstream restrictions to 210 MGD. The combined capacity of the 66 and 84-inch interplant effluent lines that parallel the Santa Ana River is 174 MGD. The full capacity of these two lines is not currently needed due to the limited headworks capacity of 100 MGD at Reclamation Plant No. 1. .r JOINT USE FACILITIES. Joint use facilities include facilities that are shared in common by both treatment plants in the CSDOC system. The major ,J facility in this category is the ocean outfall system. The existing ocean outfall system consists of two outfalls and two out- fall booster pump stations. Both pump stations currently pump to the 120-inch outfall which is the District's main discharge point. The 78-inch outfall has not been used since the 120-inch outfall was put in service and it is pres- ently intended for use during emergency situations. The outfall system capacity is related to the condition of the outfall pipeline and the ocean tide level at the time of discharge. If pumping capa- city were available, and the 120-inch outfall was in reasonable condition with regard to pipe roughness, it could discharge approximately 420 MGD at high J 10 u tide and the current surge tower height. However, current outfall booster LJ pumping capability is not adequate to fully utilize this capacity. Outfal1 system capacity is currently limited to 350 MGD at high tide and a Manning 's pipe roughness coefficient of 0.015 with current booster pumping capabil - ities. During more favorable tide conditions, the outfall booster pumping capability is greater, but probably does not exceed about 430 MGD with the current surge tower elevation of 68.9 feet and the types of pumps that are in — ii place. V u EXISTING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The existing system and the most recent conditions it has operated under are examined in this section. DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. The Regional Water Quality Control Board's Order No. 81-26 establishes the NPDES permit under which the District currently operate. In short, the order sets discharge requirements for average flows up to 227 MGD which call for effluent biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and sus- pended solids (SS) concentrations of 160 mg/1 and 125 mg/1 respectively. LI These limits are being met with the existing system. I ' U ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SYSTEM. A schematic of the Joint Treatment Works and the 1981-82 flows that were handled by the system (221 MGD) are shown in Figure 4. The rated capacities of the two treatment plants and associated facilities are representative of facilities that were in place in 1981-82. In 1981-82, the existing system was handling more flow than the rated design L capacity. I1 The total average daily flow entering the system exceeded design capacity U by approximately 37 MGD. Despite these high flows, the Districts have been successful in meeting their current discharge requirements. This is possible LJ 11 [ [ I [ I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I rn � = N DIVERSION /00 STRUCTURE 60 10, RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 INTERPLANT Qp TREATMENT CAPACITY EFFLUENT LIMES 60 46 MGD CAPACITY-174 MGD 221 12084 HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 100 MGD OUTFALL 78" * o ° SYSTEM p M CAPACITY-350 MGD LINTERPLANT VERSION SYSTEM PACITY- 110 MGD TREATMENT 10•—_� 161 PLANT NO. 2 195* 300 TREATMENT CAPACITY -�-� 138 M G D HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 276 MGD 00 PEAK FLOW - MGD , MARCH 1982 AVERAGE FLOW - MGD, FISCAL YEAR 1981- 82ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SYSTEM * ESTIMATED FLOW DURING 1,981 -82 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 4 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS u because of the current discharge limits that are now in effect , and the extent JI U of the secondary capacity that is now available at Reclamation Plant No. 1. With existing facilities, the Districts had the ability to produce effluent of u secondary quality to about 27 percent of total 1981-82 flows. In March 1982, peak wet weather flows exceeded rated influent pumping capacity and the rated design capacity of the outfall booster pump station by 24 and 50 MGD respectively (see Figure 4). The ability of the system to handle peak flows in excess of its design capacity is the result of stressing LJ the system beyond normal limits, and favorable operating conditions. The - II ability to pump 300 MGD into Treatment Plant No. 2 results from the use of a V pump designated as "standby" at the headworks. Had both standby pumps been +' down for repairs, as one was, peak influent pumping capabilities would have �( been restricted. L� Also, total system flows peaked at 400 MGD in March, 1982 during average II tide conditions; the lower tides provide greater capacity in the outfall U system. Had flows peaked in December or January as they have in the past, higher tide conditions would have made disposal efforts more difficult. �y During March, 1983, flows well beyond 400 MGD were experienced. Most of L the peak was stored in the sewer system, however, overflows were observed in the systems lower reaches. At current average daily flows, the current maximum flow expected for the system is 434 MGD. -- Expansion projects are now underway at Treatment Plant No. 2 that will relieve the deficiencies at that facility. The two projects will increase U treatment capacity to 162 MGD and influent pumping capacity to 321 MGD. The additional influent pumping capability will allow the introduction of approxi - m ately 421 MGD into the CSDOC system while disposal capacity will be limited to only 350 MGD during high tides. u u 13 U wi In accordance with the above discussion, it is apparent that the current system is short on treatment and disposal capacity at today's flow rates. As 'EW flow rates increase, these deficiencies will become more acute since standby capacity is already being utilized to operate the system beyond its rated WW capacity. iold PROJECTED SITUATION 'ni In the near future, the existing Joint Treatment Works will need to be expanded. Additional facilities will be needed to improve reliability, keep pace with anticipated flow increases and to meet more stringent discharge requirements. WASTEWATER FLOW AND STRENGTH. In the future, it is expected that flows will increase and discharge requirements will probably become more severe. Anticipated future flow increases to the overall Joint Works system are depicted in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5, by the year 2002-03 average daily flows to the Joint Treatment Works are expected to reach 307 MGD with poten- tial peak wet weather flows approaching 597 MGD. The expected distribution of these flows between the District 's two treatment plants is shown in Figure 6. As shown, current planning calls for r.i Treatment Plant No 2 to be expanded to its ultimate capacity of 175 MGD before expanding Reclamation Plant No. 1. At its ultimate capacity, Treatment Plant No. 2 will be designed to handle peak flows of 350 MGD, however, until a new Plant No. 1 headworks is constructed Plant No. 2 peak flows could exceed this limit (the new Plant No. 1 headworks is estimated to take at least four years to design and construct. During this period, peak flows beyond 100 MGD that would normally be handled by Plant No. 1 will need to be diverted to Plant No. 2). 14 � I u J 400 RECORDED FLOW .iAwiAmr wA PROJECTED FLOW j 350 L i `I a3 0 0— /Aw-4wAdo,�I'I, JJ z Of04 J 250 /// o �� J J / - L 200 U , so L` a� u , 00 to O O " i0 n O r gyp. m p 1. A e0 ID �O 1p A A A A 00 co A O A so A O A A cc _ r r r r r FISCAL YEAR J u PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW TO JOINT WORKS. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. I ' MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 5 `J JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS I i W rr r.i RECORDED FLOW 300 PROJECTED FLOW 250 0 20o PLANT No. 2 Wei 175 MGD 00/ Z 150 O ol/AO J 1 0 0 //00 /// PLANT No. 1 50 rd low O m O O '' yr P N CO O co W am O W O O 0 W W W cc O 0 O O O O r r r r r r r r N N FISCAL YEAR PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW TO PLANT No. 1 AND PLANT No. 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 6 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Yr Flow increases that are scheduled to be handled at Reclamation Plant No. LJ 1 are also shown on Figure 6. Current forecasts of future tributary flows - indicate that Reclamation Plant No. 1 will be treating 95 MGD within 5 years (1987-88) with associated peak flows approaching 177 MGD. By 2002-03, the � I plant could be treating as much as 132 MGD requiring hydraulic capacity for 1� peak flows approaching 247 MGD. u The quality of wastewater tributary to the Joint Works is not expected to change substantially in the foreseeable future. The Districts current source u control program seems effective in stabilizing increases in both organic and trace element constituents that may place an added burden on the system. The one exception would be slight increases in influent BOD concentrations that could result from flow contributions from SAWPA. - DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. In 1972 Congress passed the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500) requiring all municipally owned treatment works to provide second- � + ary treatment by 1977. However, this legislation was amended in 1977 to allow IJ ocean dischargers to seek variances from this requirement. At the time of this writing, public comment is being solicited on a CSDOC proposal to provide partial secondary treatment resulting in effluent BOD and SS concentrations of L 100 and 95 mg/1 respectively. The proposal , commonly called the "Ocean Waiver," was given tentative approval by the Environmental Protection Agency � i (EPA) in November 1981. Although the waiver allows lesser degrees of treat- ment than were ultimately envisioned, the discharge requirements are more severe than those currently in effect. The "Ocean Waiver" will be in effect for a period of five years. At the expiration of the five year permit period I , of the waiver, an environmental assessment must be performed by the RWQCB to L establish future requirements. U 17 ` ; Mai FACILITY NEEDS Total average flow entering the Joint Treatment Works could reach 307 MGD by fiscal year 2002-03 with associated peak wet weather flows approaching 597 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 will have reached its ultimate design capacity of 175 MGD and Reclamation Plant No. 1 could be treating as much as 132 MGD of MW flow. Clearly, a substantially expanded treatment and hydraulic capability will be needed to serve the estimated future population of CSDOC. M+ The additional facilities needed at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Treatment Plant No. 2, the Interplant System and the Ocean Outfall System are discussed MW below. While twenty year needs are presented, the emphasis is placed on immediate facility needs or those that should be constructed in the next five years. The five year facility needs described below will not necessarily meet v design criteria which has historically been used, however, they will be a major step in this direction. Uncertainties in predicting future population growth rates and in predicting future discharge requirements make the planning of future facilities very difficult. The approach used here, has been to w develop a limited 5 year program for capital improvements. This program is iNd primarily directed at improving hydraulic reliability in the system. Addi- tional improved treatment facilities that may be. necessary have been postponed in anticipation of a better definition of future discharge requirements and further evaluation of new treatment processes. The risk associated with this d delay is possible degradation of effluent quality toward the latter part of the first five years in the study period if flows increase at currently pre- dicted rates. The overall system should therefore be reevaluated in four to five years with more current information on actual treatment efficiencies, flow increases and future discharge requirements. Due to the construction time that is necessary to add major facilities, the timeliness of reevaluating the system cannot be overemphasized. 18 RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. Reclamation Plant No. 1 is currently limited in U hydraulic and primary treatment capabilities. Within the next twenty years, an additional 86 MGD of primary treatment capacity will be needed to treat u projected flows approaching 132 MGD. If discharge requirements do not become f more severe than those in the "Ocean Waiver" and if more innovative improved U treatment techniques are not developed, an additional 38 MGD of improved treatment capacity could be needed in the year 2002-03. A layout of the Li facilities needed in 2002-03 using rectangular primary sedimentation basins is shown on the aerial photograph in Figure 7. An alternate layout using f circular sedimentation basins is shown is Figure 8. A decision on the type of sedimentation basins to be used is being deferred until additional operating information is available from the recently remodeled rectangular clarifiers A, u B and C at Treatment Plant No. 2. Immediate Facility Needs. There is currently an excess of secondary (improved) treatment capacity at Plant No. 1, however, within five years (1987-88), these facilities will be stressed to meet discharge requirements in U the "Ocean Waiver." Additional improved treatment capability is not included in the recommended facility additions for the next five years at this time U because of the Districts ongoing research of more appropriate improved treat- u ment techniques and the possibility of revised discharge requirements. The Districts are currently examining alternative processes such as advanced primary treatment, primary effluent filtration, attached growth biological systems and the activated carbon treatment system. The demonstrated feasi - bility of any one of these systems could have a pronounced affect on future �J improved treatment needs. By 1987-88, average daily flow rates reaching Reclamation Plant No. 1 are expected to be approaching 95 MGD with possible peak flows of approximately U 19 L� I ' LEGEND 5-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS 20-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS THICKENERS - SECONDARY CLARIFIERS i JLJi I TT:T TTTT'R9"Zi" � -- MEN SUBSTATION COMES, ,a - , i AREA FOR ADDITIONAL - ao. FUTURE DIGESTERS wY z� , W. i. AREA FOR ADDITIONAL FUTURE PRIMARY CLARIFIERS i REA FOR FUTURE IMPROVED TREATMENT_ 1 _ ioo +oo _ PHOTOGRAPHED MAY 14.1982 'TREET PROPOSED FACILITY ADDITIONS AT RECLAMATION PLANT No. 1 LAID OUT FOR RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS FIGURE 7 Y R -I - FACILITY NEEDS 1 R FACILITY NEEDS HEADWOR OENERATO Y 1 W 2 ¢ � t �c, t ua.- rm PHOTOGRAPHED t MAY 14. 1982 PROPOSED FACILITY ADDITIONS AT RECLAMATION PLANT No. 1 LAID OUT FOR CIRCULAR CLARIFIERS FIGURE 8 177 MGD. As a minimum, a new Plant No. 1 headworks, and additional primary clarification and digestion capacity will be needed to meet these projected W flows. A new 200 MGD headworks is proposed with an initial pumping capability of 80 MGD. The new headworks would feed an additional 24 MGD of primary clarification capacity and two new 110 foot diameter digesters would be added. Additional facilities will also be needed to provide support services for the expanded treatment capability. Specific additions that will be needed for `mi the new headworks and primary treatment system include: • An expanded digester gas utilization system to provide fuel for the rJ new headworks pumps; W19 • An expanded standby electrical capability to insure operation of the new and existing headworks during power interruptions ; "i • A new prechlorination facility to provide odor control capabilities at the new headworks; and Mir • A new plant water system to meet increased plant water demands that W will result from the expansion. A new boiler facility and additional energy recovery systems will also be Mimi needed to provide heat for the new digesters. In addition, aeration effi- ciency improvements at the activated sludge plant will help to conserve Mimi energy. A layout of major facilities in the recommended five year improvement program is shown on the aerial photographs in Figures 7 and 8. r.l TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. The expansion recommendations at Reclamation ,spi Plant No. 1 are needed to supplement the ultimate capacity of Treatment Plant No. 2. Therefore, prior to 1987-88, Treatment Plant No. 2 will have reached W the planned capacity of 175 MGD. Immediate Facility Needs. The facilities needed at Treatment Plant No. 2 Mir to reach its ultimate planned capacity include: primary sedimentation basin N 22 u and 0 now under construction; the Treatment Plant No. 2 hydraulic reliability v project (P2-25-2) now nearing the start of construction; two additional i primary sedimentation basins (P & Q) ; and the replacement of two pumps in LJ headworks C. Odor control improvements. are also needed. Following completion of these facilities, Treatment Plant No. 2 will have L a primary treatment capacity of 175 MGD with capabilities to provide secondary treatment to 75 MGD of the total flow. As with Reclamation Plant No. 1, this secondary treatment capability could be stressed perhaps up to 90 MGD to meet L "Ocean Waiver" effluent requirements in 1987-88 if they are still in effect. Peak influent pumping capability following full expansion of Treatment LI Plant No. 2 will be 350 MGD. A layout of major Plant No. 2 facilities that L are being recommended are shown on the aerial photograph of Treatment Plant No. 2 in Figure 9. 11 u INTERPLANT SYSTEM. In twenty years, when peak flows leaving Reclamation L Plant No. 1 are approaching 247 MGD, an additional 73 MGD of capacity will be needed to supplement the existing 174 MGD interplant effluent system. The 1 ; additional capacity would be provided for with a third interplant line paral - V leling the existing 66 and 84 lines along the Santa Ana River. The line would L be sized to provide disposal capacity that would match total headworks capa- city or to carry approximately 126 MGD of Reclamation Plant No. 1 effluent. An 84 to 96-inch line would be needed. Immediate Facility Needs. The 177 MGD peak flow expected at Reclamation L� Plant No. 1 in 1987-88 will fully utilize the current interplant effluent system capacity of 174 MGD; therefore, it is recommended that expansions to �J the interplant system begin by that date. U OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM. Current estimates of the ultimate flow requiring II disposal through the ocean outfall system require that a disposal capacity of 23 L u AN • �' ate ; •.. \\ 1: 4mma.-44 ` 7-7 . r, �, LEGEND 5-YEAR FACILITY NEEDS i s 1 1 1 -H. - _ •• . 1. ? 717 i !4 J ww r , P ,4 N Q o goo zw PHOTOGRAPHED MAY 12, 1902 PROPOSED FACILITY ADDITION AT TREATMENT PLANT No . 2 FIGURE 9 J 625 MGD be available. A disposal capacity of 480 MGD is available in the 120- '� inch outfall if booster pumping capability is supplemented. The additional 145 MGD of capacity needed could be furnished by the 78-inch outfall . The r.i current capacity of the 78-inch outfall is 230 MGD, however, if the outfall is W extended by 7,200 feet to discharge at a depth of 120 feet, its capacity will be reduced to 160 MGD. After a new outfall booster pump station for the 120- �+ inch outfall is complete, the existing Foster pump station would be modified for use with the 78-inch outfall . Immediate Facility Needs. Current deficiencies in disposal capacity can W be eliminated by constructing a new outfall booster pump station for use with the 120-inch outfall . The new pump station would have a capacity of 480 MGD plus standby to match the ultimate capacity of the outfall . In 1987-88, when peak flows to the outfall could be as high as 527 MGD, approximately 60 MGD would be pumped through the 78-inch outfall . This could be accomplished by using the Foster pump station for booster pumping capabil - ities. r+ Modifications to the Foster pump station and extension of the 78-inch outfall have not been considered in the first five year improvements however, planning for these facilities should be started toward the end of the five year period. The tentative location of the new outfall booster pump station is shown on Figure 9. The final location will be determined in final design. low EXPANDED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY W In 1987-88, the 5 year improvement program will have put the Districts in a position to handle potential peak flows although discharge requirements will 401 be more difficult to meet than they are today because of the increased flows. As shown in Figure 10, projected peak flows just about equal the `r 25 rr M DIVERSION STRUCTURE 9s 174 RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 INTERPLANT 52 TREATMENT CAPACITY EFFLUENT LINES ` JZ 95 70 MGD CAPACITY- 174 MGD 270 0 HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 180 MGD OUTFALL 78" to SYSTEM a CAPACITY-710 MGD INTERPLANT DIVERSION SYSTEM CAPACITY - 110 MGD TREATMENT 175 PLANT NO. 2 22 353 TREATMENT CAPACITY 175 MGD HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 351 MGD 000 PEAK FLOW - MGD 0 AVERAGE FLOW - MGD ANALYSIS OF SYSTEM FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED PROJECT, 1987-88 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE 10 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS .r ,J hydraulic capabilities of the system, however, average flows exceed rated treatment capacity by 25 MGD. The deficiency in rated treatment capacity will be at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The rated design capacity of the primary plant will be 70 MGD although it may be treating approximately 95 MGD. This is comparable to todays use of a 46 MGD facility to treat 60 MGD. An estimate of the improved treatment capacity necessary at Reclamation Plant No. 1 to meet ocean waiver discharge requirements, assuming that the �+ pure oxygen plant at Treatment Plant No. 2 can be stressed to 90 MGD, is 79 MGD. To provide this level of improved treatment capacity, the existing 46 MGD activated sludge plant will need to be operated at 59 MGD with the trickling filter plant treating 20 MGD. Consistent performance of the facil - ity at this flow rate will be difficult to achieve. .,r The result of the five year capital improvement program will therefore be an increase in the system's hydraulic reliability, although improved treatment `r facilities will be stressed to consistently meet discharge requirements. KEY FINDINGS The existing Joint Treatment Works considering projects now under con- struction is capable of treating present average daily flows of 221 MGD if some built in standby capacity is utilized. However, the systems ability to handle peak wet weather flows is limited. While observed flows to date have not created problems, the potential is present for peak wet weather flows to exceed the hydraulic capabilities of the existing system. As tributary flows increase, the risks associated with these deficiencies will increase. r, The program required to correct the deficiencies involves several very major facilities. The new outfall booster pump station and the new Reclama- tion Plant No. 1 headworks will utilize more than half of the total estimated moo 27 U project costs for the five year program. Both facilities will take about four years to design and construct. If flows increase at currently predicted rates, potential peak flows could exceed the current systems optimum hydraulic capacity by as much as 70 MGD before the new facilities are in operation. � l The scope of the improvement program proposed herein is minimal and may L�II stress treatment reliability, however, hydraulic reliability is greatly L� improved. If discharge requirements remain at the levels contained in the "Ocean Waiver" and flows continue to increase at predicted rates, additional facilities will need to be planned while the recommended project is being I ' constructed. Major facilities related to Reclamation Plant No. 1 may be needed soon after the initial five year u y program is complete include: a new interplant effluent line; additional primary clarification capacity; addi- tional secondary clarification and solids handling capabilities; and addi - tional improved treatment capabilities. ESTIMATED COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION L� The estimated cost of the various facilities contained in the 5 year improvement program are summarized in Table 1. Of the estimated $94,800,000 LJ in total project costs, nearly half ($48,900,000) will be for Reclamation Plant No. 1 improvements. The new outfall booster pump station will be the second largest expenditure at an estimated $32,000,000. Total estimated j project costs to expand Treatment Plant No. 2 to its ultimate capacity of 175 MGD are $13,700,000 including proposed odor control facilities. The above LJ costs are in today's dollars (December 1982 @ ENRLA of 4750). A recommended implementation schedule for the five year facility needs is shown on Figure 11. The various facilities were prioritized on the following basis. 28 U No TABLE 1 WW SUMMARY OF OVERALL 5 YEAR FACILITY NEEDS WW Additional Facilities Estimated Project Costa RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS New Headworks Facility $17,300,000 Primary Clarifiers 4,800,000 Digesters 7,900,000 Plant Water Pump Station 2,000,000 �., Electrical Reliability 2,400,000 Subtotal 0,34,400,000 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS `r Aeration Efficiency Improvements $ 5,800,000 Heat Recovery Projects 1,300,000 Mixing Equipment 600,000 Low Pressure Gas Storage 300,000 High Pressure Gas Compressor 800,000 Boiler Facility 200,000 Prechlorination Facilities 3,600,000 Cogeneration Facility 11900,000 Subtotal $14,500,000 Plant No. 1 Total $48,900,000 TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS Project No. P2-25-2 $ 5,000,000 Headworks C Pumps 600,000 Circular Primary Clarifiers (P&Q) 4,700,000 Subtotal $10,300,000 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS `r Sewer Gas Scrubber $ 800,000 Odor Control Facilities 2,600,000 Subtotal 3,400,000 Plant No. 2 Total $13,700,000 JOINT FACILITIES Nei BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS Outfall Booster Pump Station & Surge Tower Extension $32,100,000 Flap Gates for Discharge 003 100,000 Joint Facilities Total $32,200,000 GRAND TOTAL $94,800,000 MW a All cost data adjusted to an ENRLA construction cost index of 4750. ow 29 U FISCAL YEAR PROJECT 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 19 86-87 1987-88 J SEGMENT No. I Project No. P2-25-2 Headworks C Li New Outfall Booster Pump Station New Plant No. 1 Headworks g7= Clarifiers P and Q - Plant No. 2 v Primary Clarifiers - Plant No. 1 Plant No. 2 Odor Control Facilities Digesters No. 11 and 12 - Plant No. 1 LJ Flap Gates for Discharge - 003 I� V SEGMENT No.2 Electrical Reliability - Plant No. 1 `I Heat Recovery - Plant No. 1 Mixing Equipment - Plant No. 1 High Pressure Gas Compressor - Plant No. 1 Plant Water Pump Station - Plant No. 1 SEGMENT No. 3 u Plant No. 2 Headworks Modifications (2-48 MGD Pumps) Prechlorination Facility - Plant No. 1 Boiler Facility - Plant No. 1 Plant No. 1 Aeration Efficiency Improvements Low Pressure Gas Storage - Plant No. 1 Plant No. 1 Cogeneration Facility u LEGEND: DESIGN BID I..I CONSTRUCTION (Arrow is Midpoint) IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR RECOMMENDED PROJEC rs COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA. MASTER PLAN UPDATE FIGURE If JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Facilities that will allow greater volumes of wastewater to enter and leave the District 's treatment works have been given first consideration. These facilities include the new Plant No. 1 headworks, the Plant No. 2 hydraulic reliability project and a new outfall booster pump station and surge tower extension. In accordance with current planning, Treatment Plant No. 2 should be expanded to its ultimate capacity prior to expanding Reclamation Plant No. `~ 1. This can be accomplished through the addition of sedimentation basins P and Q. Other Reclamation Plant No. 1 facilities such as sedimentation basins, and digesters can be phased to coincide with the completion of the new headworks facility. Since most of these facilities require less design and construction time (see Figure 11), their implementation can be delayed until the headworks project is well underway. Remaining Plant No. 1 facilities have been scheduled in relation to their importance. Projects related to energy recovery and electrical reliability are given a high priority. Other projects are scheduled in Figure 11 toward the latter part of the five year period because of their lesser relative significance compared to other recommended facilities. J 31 ..a �i �i �i b RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS MAY 11, 1983 - 7 :30 P.M. I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 1 DRT_NU_H8ER_.AF4_�_.-- --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063,1117 A-1 NURSERIES __-__ - _._.__________ _ . . S650.1.5-__- LANDSCAP-ING--SUPP-L-I ES 063349 ACCU - SLUDGE $166.60 SAMPLERS 063349 A.T.R.• SALES* INC. $40.39 PIPE SUPPLIES 063350 ACTION INSTRUMENTS, INC. $671.12 _.-__ELECT-RICAL SUPPLIES-- _ - ---- 063351 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTOkSr INC. $209105.23 CONTRACTOR 5-12-2 063352 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC. 13,915.76 PLANT N2 GENERATOR START-UP m063353 AMERICAN -DIGITAL _SY_STLHS91NC.-.. _ _ ._._ _._. 31r916.67_ __- _FLOW--MONITORIHG - Z 063354 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1r229.39 LAB SUPPLIES d 06335`_' ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES 119.61 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS C.6335t- THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. f19785.04 _____ENGINE..-PARTS-__.__ _._. n63357 AQUA REN CORP. $13*550.31 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS - " ' 063358 ATLAS RADIATOR SERVICE f858.84 TRUCK PARTS m; 063359 BAKER PLYWOOD MALL--HARDWARE 3 063360 3ANK OF AMERICA NT & SA S36.46 TRAVEL EXPENSES, VARIOUS MEETINGS 063361 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $125.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Ln 063362 A.M. BEST COMPANY f42.98 ___ _ PUBLLCATJDIi____.__.-_ --- ' 06'363 BEVCO 1748.68 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 063364 FLAKE. MOFFITT & TOWNE $2,989.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES G63365 PATRICIA DAVIS BOGGAN_____-__ __.-__-__.___._ _ _ _..__5.720.D0 f'LANL92_AS-BlLLLT-DRAEIIN 063366 BROWNELL ELECTRO, INC. $96.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES m , 063367 STEVE DUDALO CONSTRUCTION CO. 1249r966.40 CONTRACTOR 11-13-3 .`. 06136P BUTLER NATIONAL CORP. _ $272.66 _._ __PIPE__SUPPLIES_ _____- d 063360 PUTTERWORT11 (PUBLISHERS) INC. $57.71 TECHNICAL JOURNALS ~ 06337P, C R R PECONDITIONING Co. $19295.r10 PUMP REPAIRS 063371 CIIAMDEk-MIX CONCRET.Er_ INC. _..__._____-_.___ .. ._. _ .__.. - S665.53__-_ f+U1LD.ING-_MATE4tIALS 70 063372 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $1r062.12 GASOLINE � ! � 063373 CLARKES WATERPROOFING $100.00 CSDOC #6 MANHOLE REPAIRS i 065374 CONANT CONTROLS, INC. $592.71 _._ _ VALVES _ C/') ii 96337'j CONNELL CHEVROLET $683.42 TRUCK PARTS bfE 371- CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 139079.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 36'377 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL .CO __ _ -. 419,964. CHLORI-NE---- - 06337A CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO. $29314.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i 063379 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES S29352.92 ENGINE PARTS OC3380 MR. CRANE $19400.00 _ . EQUIPMENT RENTAL - - -- ---------- i n6,381 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $43.37 EQUIPMENT RENTAL n633P, CULLIGAN DEIONIZED WATEP SERVICE $21.70 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 0633?3 LARRY CURTI TRUCK- & EQUIPMENT _-_ 11.196.00 -- ._________EQUIPMENT--RENTAL ---- - 063384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 195.00 ANNEXATION FEE PROCESSING (If.338F DAILY PILOT $39.06 LEGAL ADVERTISING ! .16338r DANIEL INDUSTRIES 11r538.37 CONTROL- EQUIPMENT.._ .._ A63387 DECO t354.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I �E3'61• JELf111 SYSTEMS• INC. $2,�i55.OV MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES, COMPUTER PROGRAMS j 0633f,° DIESEL CONTROL CORF S149.54 _TRUCK PARTS i C6339ri DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. t29540.00 DIGESTER REPAIRS ` C6'.391 DRAKFrS GRADING & TOPSOIL 1159.00 SAND -- f �f.53'a DRIVER TESTING CENTER $19.09 DRIVER EXAMS D ! IL - - - ---- 1 ' FUND NO 919q - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 2 -REPORT--NUMBER_-.A P 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/06/P3 � WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063393 _ . __._EASTMAN._INC...._..._.-.-_----. _---.-----_ --_-__- _-- $765.88 .--------_OFf 1 CE-SUPPL IFS- ' 06?394 ENCHANTER* INC. 139500.00 OCEAN MONITORING 063395 FMC CORP. $805.60 PUMP PARTS 063396 FISCHER B PORTER CO.._.____..___. _ $39379.2.3 -- - -- _P-IPE-SUPPLIES------------ " 063397 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 1667.17 LAB SUPPLIES 063396 FLO-SYSTEMS $326.80 PIPE SUPPLIES "r C63399 ___C._M._F..LORES..RENTALS _-_-.. $1.925.aD-.--_-.-MANHOLE-REPA-IRS 063400 FOOTHILL ENGINE 6 EQUIPMENT CO $786.52 ENGINE PARTS 063401 FOOTHILL GARDEN EQUIPMENT $106.95 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 063402 THE- FOXBORO COMPANY . . . . 119241.52 .._ _ .-__..___PUMP PARTS_ --------_____ i 063403 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $816.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS 063404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $19364.22 LUMBER •'�� ; 063405 . . . GEtJERAL_TELEPHONE -Cp.____- __.. _. _ S4B3.06-- ---.-TELEPHONE----- 063406 M.E. GRAY CO. $4 70.88 PIPE SUPPLIES 063407 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. 150.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . ._.._- 063408 DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES.__.._._-___ . . 12.089.00 _ _ -. ._ _. --SURVEY--1-1-=1.3-3 _ U63409 HACH COMPANY $230.18 LAB SUPPLIES 063410 LARRY HALL'S SR9.57 TRUCK REPAIRS C ' OE3411 -__ ____.____HALSLE0_8_.NO&GANs._1.NC- ____ _..11.1...99_ F.LEC_T_M-CAL-S-UP_P-L-I- •• 063412 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $89.34 PIPE SUPPLIES 063413 HOAGLAND-ARTUKOVICH. J.V. S�i5.789.U0 CONTRACTOR P2-25-IA :. 06Z414 _.HOUSE_OF. BATTERIES._ -._ _ _ - E9..16 __.___._____BATTER.IES -.-_ 063415 HOWARD SUPPLY CO. 1107.74 PIPE SUPPLIES 063416 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 211.44 WATER USEAGE 063417 _..__.HUNTINGTON 141.13 -SMALL--HAADLTAR 063418 IDEAL AEROSMITH• INC. 5147.71 VALVES 063419 INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE $99010.30 CONTRACTOR PW-094 "C n 063420 INGRAM PAPER . . 144.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES-_-------------- - - ------- 06?421 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $29023.70 LAB SUPPLIES ..` 031 063422 KAMAN BEARINGS s SUPPLY S660.93 BEARING SUPPLIES 063423 _KIMMERLE BROS....INC.._.._____ __ .. .________.._-._. $98.98 ....___.-_-__.-JANITOR-I-AL---SUPPL-IFS--- 063424 KING BEARINGS INC. $362.77 BEARING SUPPLIES 063425 KIRST PUMP 8 MACHINE WORKS $53.37 PUMP PARTS _ - •'� 063426 KOHL'S HALLMARK CENTER $291.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 063427 L.B.W.S.. INC. $257.30 WELDING SUPPLIES 06342P LAKE FOREST ELECTRIC VEHICLES $315.18 ELECTRIC CART PARTS '•C 663429 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE.-SUPPLY. "1221.05..-____-_._SAFE-TY-SUP-P-L-IES- - -- ; I 063430 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS. INC. $19.11 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES {!I R63431 LOS ANGELES CHEMICAL CO. $310.37 SOLVENTS 063432 LOWRY 8 ASSOCIATES 1169995.43 .. _ _.. CSD0C--#13.._FORMAT.ION ._.___ " C6343; MATT - CHLOR. INC. $610.76 PIPE SUPPLIES 0E3434 MCMASTER-CARF SUPPLY CO. 1513.09 SMALL HARDWARE L 063435 MILD EQUIPMENT CORP. _.__. $154.80 ._ -.__ _.-_ TRUCK-PARTS------- ------------------- 063436 MODERN ALLOYS* INC. S1.562.51 PIPE SUPPLIES 063437 J. ARTHUR MOORE. CA. INC. $199.80 �. VALVES 063438 E.B. MORIT7 FOUNDRY $29157.10 MANHOLE RING & COVERS �I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 3 ._-_REPORT_NUMBER_AP43_..__ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 34/JG/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063439 MOTION .INDUSTRIESq-_INC.._--________-__ __. _.__-._-_._...._._... $19626.0.4_____.__-__.P.IPE-SUPPLIES---------- ' 063440 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION S34.00 PUBLICATIONS G63441 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $214.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063442 CITY. OF. NEWPORT. BEACH.- _-__. _ -$5.00 ... . __ WATER-USEAGE - -- ------- 06'443 O.T.S. DISTRIBUTORS $312.70 TOOLS ..� C63444 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $110.65 VALVES 063445 _ _. OXYGEN SERVICE__.__ -.__.-_____._.-_ _..._..__..._.__...____�. ril 063446 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR $18,290.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES 06!447 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $119237.87 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND 06344P PPG. INDUSTRIES, INC. $19114.00 _-PAINT--SUPPLLES-----__-_...- 063449 PACIFIC TELEPHONE $121.60 TELEMETERING 06345f PAC-WELD i114.48 WELDING SUPPLIES ••� 063451 MR.._B_.tlRS.-WILL LAM-O.. .19a0._01)__._ _-LIA81-LIUI-CLAIM-5E-T-TL€M€#T " 063452 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS9 INC. $418.22 PUMP PARTS ' '•"! 063453 PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER $30.05 • „� EQUIPMENT REPAIRS � •• 063454 PETRO-LEWIS. CORE_ ._--.--_-... . _ - __. .. $624.95 - _._ USE_ CHARGE­0VERPAYMEN_T----- u Di " 063455 PICKWICK PAPER FRODUCTS E357.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES • I 06345E PITNEY BOWES $28.34 POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES 063457 . .........__..__.PLAOENTLA._TRUCK-_WRECK1Nh ...._-._-_ _3.74.50.- T-RUCK-1'AR4S " 063458 POSTMASTER - - 7,19400.00 POSTAGE 063459 R. J. W. CONSTRUCTION CO.• INC $319016.50 CONTRACTOR PW-085 �,•`•� 063460 RAFFERTY_1NTERNAT]ONAL .TRUCKS _ _ _ ._ _ E260.36___ _ .. _ TRUCK--PARTS --- -------------- 063461 RORERTSHAW CONTROLS CO. $384.97 " CONTROL EQUIPMENT 063462 PEGGY ROOEMAKER TR2.00 OFFICE MACHINES 063463 ___ ROSEMOUNTs_1NC.__ $318.75 - CONTROITEQUIPMENT-- D63464 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $217.51 WIRE 063465 JOSEPH T. RYERSON 8 SON• INC. $170.00 STEEL STOCK ••1 063466 SANCON INC. _ _ . . . . .- - $49875.00 _ ____ . MANHOLE- REPAIRS- - ------ 063467 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS S696.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0634F8 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $29995.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS •'� 063469 SARGENT-WELCH_SCIENT.IF.IC-_CO. ._.._ _ _.___-.-._ -...__ - . $122.23____-____._____.LAB- SUPP-LI-6S-------- " 063470 SIIAMROCK SUPPLY %486.28 TOOLS 063471 SHEPHARD MACHINERY CO. $916.36 TRUCK PARTS L 063472 SMART 6 FINAL IRIS CO. $34.32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES--- - -- - " 063473 A. F. SMITH B SONS CONST. CO. $179726.56 CONTRACTOR PI-19-2 063474 SMITH-EMERY CO. $49009.25 TESTING 11-13-3 ••� 063475 SO. CALIF. COASTAL .WATER_ RESEARCH PROJECT $12.340.00__.___._-._-__DEEP-OCEAN-SLUDGE-D-"POSAL-STUDY 063476 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $1829422.50 POWER 063477 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. S18.44 WATER USEAGE •.� 063478 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $119414.56 ._ . . DIESEL _FUEL_-.__ •' ------------------- ------------- 06347c SPECIALTY PRODUCTS DISTR. CO. 12r465.35 PAINT SUPPLIES ( 063490 STAP.OW STEEL $260.25 STEEL STOCK .•� 0634AI SCOTT STEVENS $60.OL ---EMPLOYEE MILEAGE-----. -- " C63482 GAPY G. STREED $119004.64 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAY-OFF 063403 THE SUPPL1EkS E134.56 SMALL HARDWARE ••� 0634P4 J. I4AYNE SYLVESTER $19666.14 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT . a f 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 4 -REPORT...-NUMBER_AP43 ----- --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 04/05/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063485 _._ TPC_ TRAINING- SYSTEMS._---...-_ __-._ ____ -_- -_- %283.36_____ ___--TECHNICA"OURNALS- ' 063486 TAYLOR INSTRUMENTS $150.16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063487 TECH/AID $798.00 TEMPORARY HELP 063488 ARTHUR H. THOMAS CO.- _ $62.68 --____p_I PE-SUPP-L I ES--------- ------ 063489 P.M. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING $1.340.12 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 063490 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $988.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 063491 _ _111011 _..TEMPORARY__SERV.ICES—._____--.—__--_— _--_$7aG.50---_ TEMPORARY--HELP- 063492 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE• INC. $19250.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES � •. 063493 TRANSAMERICA DELEVAL, INC. $1.099.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES "•� 063494 TRAVEL BUFFS _ . $268.00 . ______-AI-R---FAR ET--VAR-IOUS-MEETINGS-- ---.--- 063495 TROJAN BATTERIES $581.11 TRUCK BATTERIES ` 06349E TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY• INC. E49814.78 TRUCK PARTS 063497 TUOESALES_ --.--.•--------.-_---.-. -------------..- $483.58-.-. TUBING '• 06349(+ J.G• TUCKER & SON• INC. $554.89 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063499 U.S. DIVERS COMPANY $440.69 LAB REPAIRS 06350C ULTRASYSTEMS• INC.. . $543.00 .. _-ENVIRONENTAL-REPOR-T-- t 063501 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $32.73 DELIVERY SERVICE 963502 UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO.. I NC. $112.82 COMPRESSOR PARTS w` 063503 VWR .SCIENTIFIC._ _- $640.98_--___ _ 063504 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $724.21 PIPE SUPPLIES 063505 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC $833.40 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT .�' ,0: 0F3506 VALVE & STEEL SUPPLY. CO. . ._ .__ _ $327.54.. ___ VALVES------- ---- ---- -- 063507 VAUGHANOS INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO 129500.62 BEARINGS ;( 06350N VOTO MACHINE $1,350.00 PUMP PARTS 161519 WARREN & DAILEY .-------.------.. .-----.-..- .__- __..__-- S396.35-----P-1PE-SUP-PI-I-ES---- 063510 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $19589.86 ENGINE PARTS ►-�i 063511 WAX SHOP $205.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES •'� 063512 WESTERN ELECTRONIC SUPPLY CORP $148.40____. _ -ELECTRICAL-SUPPLIES---- --- •• DE3513 WESTERN TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES $4.611.00 SCRUBBER REPAIRS 063514 WESTERN WIPE & ALLOYS S124.02 WELDING SUPPLIES •� ! 063515 WYLE DISTRIBUTIONS GROUP._ $4.00.24_______-_ __-ELECTRICAL-SURP4IES-- ----- ----- .. 0E351E XEROX CORP. S1H2.85 XEROX REPRODUCTION I � LF3517 Y - TIRE $19754.04 TRUCK TIRES 063518 YEARY AND ASSOCIATES $704.62 PUMP PARTS - - ----------------- TOTAL .CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83- - $807.122.46 ----------------- I ' I. i I . r FUND NO 9199 - JT D14T WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ; r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _.. .._. .._..__ _.. CLAIMS Pain b4%o6/83 r SUMMARY AMOUNT :.r 12 OPER FUND ---- ----- ----- --- 6-42 . 1 ,557.09 #3 OPER FUND 1 ,536. 19 #5 OPER FUND _ 1 ,246.47 115 ACo FUND 20,105.23 N6 OPER FUND 158.74 #.7 OPER- FUND #7 ACO FUND 735.48 #11 OPER FUND 715.01 #11 ACO FUND - 256 964.65 #13 ACO FUND 16,995.43 " #566 OPER FUND 2,368.22 1' X667_OPER.-FUND JT OPER FUND 283,364.70 =- CORF 148,648.61 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE_FUND _ 00.00_,_-__ _ `''J`` `'r`ti •• SELF FUNDED WORKERS' CONP. INSURANCE FUND — 11 ,207.87 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 48,899.41 ,. TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 $807,122.46 .I l ;C C: i ` � I � :t 1 FUND NO 91Q9 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/113 PAGE 1 ; RFPORT NUMBER AP43 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY j ` CLAIMS PAID 04/29/133 WARRANT N0. VENDOR. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION j i• 063535 A-1 NURSERIES 121.94 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 063537 A.W.C. CALIFORNIA $45.77 STRIP CHARTS 063538 ACTION INSTRUMENTS• INC. S219.93 DIGITAL INDICATOR 06!539 ADVANCO CONSTPUCTORSr INC. $19346.50 RETENTION P2-23-6-RI 063546 AIR CALIFORNIA $158.00 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS • 063541 AMERICAN DIGITAL SYSTEMS,INC. $19416.67 FLOW MONITORING ,i 063542 AMFRICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $224.91 LAB SUPPLIES 063543 MARCIA AMES %15.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE D63544 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $Ir352.30 PUMP PARTS 063545 AQUA BEN CORP. 113,644.45 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS :51 063546 AQUATIC CENTER $2q.00 LAB SPECIMENS 063547 ARGENTS AIR EXPRESS %92.40 FREIGHT 063548 ARROW TRUCK BODIES & EQUIPMFNT $19727.84 TRUCK PARTS -1i 0635919 N;A. b J. FRANK ARTUKOVICH JV $796.00 CSDOC #6 MANHOLE REPAIRS rn ' 063550 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PPOD.r INC $358.28 BUILDING MATERIALS 063551 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY* INC. $1 .145.45 SMALL HARDWARE C 6 3 5 5 22 BAKER PLYWOOD CO.r INC. I?g7.95 LUMBER 063553 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. $126.67 PUBLICATIONS I .I 063554 BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA $476.37 TRAVEL EXPENSES + 063555 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS-- ---- $289.37 -" " ELECTRICAL- SUPPLIES 063556 9EVCO $151.58 SMALL HARDWARE r-Tr I 063557 BIG BOX RENTAL CO. $19056.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 0E3`58 BLUE SEAL LINEN SUPPLY 1100.00 TOWEL RENTAL 063559 BOB'S AIR CONDITIONING .258.36 TRUCK REPAIRS 063560 PATRICIA DAVIS UOGGAN $840.00 P2-23-6 DRAFTING 063561 BRENTWOOD PRODUCTS $172.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 063562 BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. 12119308.60 CONSTR. MANAGEMENT P2-23-6, P2-23-6 CLAIM REVIEW 6E3563 CK PUMP AND DEWATERING CORP. $29500.00 DIGESTER REPAIRS 0635E4 CPT CALIFORNIAt INC. 1129215.33 WORD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT Or.3565 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. $117.98 LAB SUPPLIES C� C-F3F66 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. 139.15 DESCALER I D63567 CAL-WEST INDUSTRIES $g45.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 063568 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF 1299588.31 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 063569 CARMENITA FORD TRUCK SALES• INC. $242.59 TRUCK PARTS ..i ^63579 JOHN CAPOLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN $j,16A.32 CONSTR. P2-23, START-UP P2-23-6 063E71 CARUS CHEMICAL CO.r INC. $3014.77 FEEDER RENTAL 063572 CHEVRON U.S.A.r INC. $39134.94 ENGINE OIL 063573 CLARK DYE HARDWARE $107.10 SMALL HARDWARE 063574 COLITE INDUSTRIES• INC. $35.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063575 COMPUTER AUTOMATION $1r184.59 INDUSTRIAL WASTE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 86357E CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 3979.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 963577 CONSOLIDATED REPItOL'UCTlOMS $1ro29.65 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 1-63578 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 1139810.71 CHLORINE 66357Q COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 317B.32 ENGINE PARTS d635PC CORMIER-DELILLO CHEVROLET $21.33 TRUCK PARTS 063581 COSTA MESA AUTO PtPTS, INC. $383.93 TRUCK PARTS 1 e I FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/B3 PAGE 2 q_PORT NUM3ER AP43 j ------COUNTY"SANITATION DISTRICTS OF -ORANGE COUNTY - CLATMS PAID 04/20/83 WARRANT N0: VENDOR AMOUVT DESCRIPTION -'- OC3582 CULLIGAN DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE 1163.3P RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 063583 __..__ STATE OFF CALIFORNIA ' ' $35.00" " ANNEXATION PROCESSING FEE 063584 DANIEL INDUSTRIES S106:61 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0635P5 DELCO SALES $473.05 ENGINE PARTS 063586 DELPHI SYSTEMSi INC. - 132.50 HINT COHPUtER SUPPORT SERVICES 063507 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. 489527.50 SLUDGE GRINDER 063588 DOLLINGER CORP. $29011.22 COMPRESSOR PARTS ---- 63589 -'--•--..------ UNN ' DpAROS" CORP:""--`-- - - - - - - - _ - 5901:6B --- .._ __._ PAINT SUPPLIES 063596 DY14ATRON ELECTRIC CO.• INC. $500.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063591 EIMCO PROCESS EOUIP. CO. $711.68 PIPE SUPPLIES 063592 EASTMAN♦ INC: $1i295.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 06?593 GAIL LYNN ELIZARRARAS $49500.00 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT 063594 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. $56.73 PIPE SUPPLIES 063595 -' - ENVIRONMENTAL- P-ESOURCE "ASSOC. $87.5G WASTEWATER SUBSCRIPTION - 063596 FMC CORP. $1�802.00 PUMP PARTS 063597 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S?3.50 FREIGHT 063598 FISCHER & PORTER CO. 13i060.52 PIPE SUPPLIES 0635O9 FISHER CONTROLS $17.64 CONTROL EQUIPHNET I 063600 =ISHER SCIENTIFIC CO- 1176.98 LAB SUPPLIES 063601 ..FLAT "8 -VERTICAL""CONCRETF-"- $275:00 - BUILDING HAtERIALS - - 063EG2 C. M. FLORES RENTALS $3r529.70 PAVING SERVICES G63603 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY• INC. $26.00 LAB SUPPLIES 0E.3604 CITY OF FULLERTON - $17.87 WATER USEAGE 063605 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 16.59R.75 TELEPHONE '161.606 M.E. GRAY CO. $991.86 PIPE SUPPLIES - - --- - - 063607 ___ _-DON-GAEEK"'8 ASSOCIATES ---._... ....__._ __ S6i076.00 ----- -- __. SURVEY 063E01) HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. $31.02 HOSE 063609 HARIGE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. 114s343.75 ENGR. 1-211-1 06361G THE HEAD STOP $19459.97 VALVE SUPPLIES 063611 MICHAEL HEINZ $20.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE GE3612 E.G. HELLER'S SON. INC. 1103.73 TOOLS 063613 HERTZ CAR LEASING $19605.21 VEIiICLE LEASE J63614 HILT19 INC. $459.51 TOOLS 063615 HOLCHEM. INC. $2.780.OU CAUSTIC SODA 06361E HOUSE OF BATTERIES 1791.52 BATTERIES 063E17 R.S. HUGHES CO.i INC. 1695.20 PAINT SUPPLIES 06�618 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $10.62 WATER USEAGE 063619 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUPBFR STAMP 147.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 06362V HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 186.14 SMALL HARDWARE C63621 IRVINE RANCH WATEP. DISTRICT 13.20 WATER USEAGE 06Z62, BRYON JACKSON PUMP DIVISION 1680.47 PUMP PARTS 06362-7 KAMAN BLARIN:,S G SUPPLY tIvG94.65 BEARING SUPPLIES 063624 WAS SAFETY PRODUCTS 1449.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 06362" KELLY BLUE BOOK $36.00 PUBLICATION 063626 KING P.EARING• INC. I4.673.37 BEARING SUPPLIES G63627 L E N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO 13.556.45 UNIFORM RENTAL t �T bd 1 FUNG NO 9199 - JT O1ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4115183 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - - _------ -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY--- CLAIMS PAID 04/20/03 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT - DESCRiPTTOR- i PA362t+ L.F.W.S.• INC. WELDING SUPPLIES__ - 329:31 - BUILOIN6 MATERIALS 063624 - - IARRYOS BLDG: HATFRIALS9 TNC:-'- ' 063630 LAURSEN COLOR LAN Si53.71 FILM PROCESSING 063631 LAWSON PRODUCTS. INC. 1122.76 _ TRUCK PARTS 063632 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. $207.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES „i 063633 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $26.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES 063634 K.P. LINDSTROM 8 ASSOCIATES $3.739.15 EIR - OCEAN WAIVER RESPONSE " 063635 LOS ANGEtES CHEF17CAt--00:- C63636 MACK TRUCKS, INC. $346.39 TRUCK PARTS " CE3637 HATT - COLOR. INC. $26.63 _ -_PIPE SUPPLIES - 0636311 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO; S3T9:29 SMALL HARDWARE 06363' MEO-TOX ASSOCIATES9 INC. S19127.75 RETENTION PW-095 C63640 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER S6.00 WATER USEAGE__! " $177.53 -- CALIBRATION TESTING 06364] METER MASTERS INC: - --- ` :E3642 MILO EQUIPMENT CORP. $36.55 TRUCK PARTS 063643 MONITEK, INC. $1,370.60 ENGINE PARTS G6.'.E44 MOORE PRODUCTS CO- 12.163.4E SAALU HARDWARE 063645 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS CO. S906.69 TRUCK PARTS �b'E4E OXYGEN SERVICE 1116.70 SPECIALTY GASES 063F47 COUNTY-"SANITATION-D-ISTRTC•TS OF- ORANGE COUNTY E'1;D3Q:67 WORKERS' COMP. FUND xpl06364P_ PARTS UNLIMITED E2.A68.2] TRUCK PARTS rl -363649 FEAT+ MARWICK. MITCHELL B CO. $776.00 ANNUAL AUDIT EXAMINATION .36'653 PEwNwALT CORP: $38.C5 FREIGHT --�-- .• 663651 PERMA-CAL CORPORATION $11104.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES " 063652 PITNEY POWES 584.27 POSTAGE METER RENTAL cyll P63653 PORTER BOILFR SERVICE:"-INC.- -' " SAY0:99 BOILER REPAIRS .. 063654 POSTMASTER $530.00 POSTAGE o6365g IIApoLD PRIMROSE !C[ S27.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE _ 0636`b RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1146.85 TRUCK PARTS - GE3657 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 5258.00 TRASH DISPOSAL ^6365f• RE-C_Y-KLEEN CORP. $421.77 - - TRUCK REPAIRS 063659 THE REGISTER tb92.b4 - CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 063660 REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY C.O. $396.69 STEEL STOCK �63hE.1 ROACHWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5092.D4 VALVES ------ 053662 ROPE RESOURCES t19.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE USE CHARGE 04ERPAYMENT 063663 JOSEPH T. RYERSON & SON9 INC. $332.69 STEEL STOCK I .� 563664 SANCON INC. $335.00 CSDOC #7 MANHOLE REPAIRS SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS 1.353:51 - - -OFFICE FORMS O6.E6.' 06366E SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $19197.42 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 063667 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. $22.83 LAB SUPPLIES 06z66P SEARSi ROEPUCK E CO: ' C63669 SHALLER 8 LOHR. INC. $29917.00 ENGR- 5-12-2, 5-tBR, 566 MASTER PLAN UPDATE C6367( SIIAMROCK SUPPLY 32.334.42 TOOLS 063671 A:11' SIIIFKF.Yi INC: 1871.26 - TRUCK TIRES 06=672 SLUDGE $112.20 TECHNICAL JOURNAL 063673 SURTEBERG CONTROLS CORP. S1r343.24 CONTROL EQUIPMENT _--- -" MCI FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/83 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY-"SANTTATION III STRTCTS -OF -ORANGE -COUNTY- - - - CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 t WARRANT N0: VENDOR "' AMOUNT _-DESCRIPTT_ON- 063674 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $126.14 OFFICE MACHINES ( _ - 063675__,.---. ___.._..SOUTHERN CALIF': -EDISON- CO: ---..__ ________...- 195.47T;15.__-__-__ POWER------ 063676 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $46,940.85 NATURAL GAS ;;( 063677 SOUTHWEST FLEXIBLE SEWER EQUIP $296.91 PIPE SUPPLIES 06367P SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 1655.08 - WATER 6"1SPENSERS_ 063(,79 SPIRAL PINDING CO.. INC. $228.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063688 THE SUPPLIERS $6,291.04 SMALL HARDWARE 0636BI --J: "QATNE- STLVESTER -'.- _.__._- ___. _ __.. .. ..._-- . ..--.. 4Ii793-.61 -� - PE�f9 CASA HIRRUM , 063682 TAK TAKAMINE 1508.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 063683 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP. $79900.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 063684 THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES S8R0:00 66305 TROJAN BATTERIES $325.82 TRUCK BATTERIES 363686 TRUCK 3 AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $1.244.45 TRUCK PARTS ,. . 063687 TRUKSPECT _ - _--------_-__ $11320:40 TRUCK PARTS - - 063688 J.G. TUCKER & SON• INC. 1594.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063689 U.S. RENTALS $60.56 DRILL RENTAL 063E90 UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. 17?.25 - -- GA96Ll NE� - 063691 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S28.84 DELIVERY SERVICE ; 063602 UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO.. INC. $59067.30 COMPRESSOR PARTS 063693 - - VWR SCIENTIFIC -- -_ ..... _ - ----- $635-78 �Ae sii�P-LTE s 063694 VAUGHANOS INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO $941.40 TRUCK REPAIRS 063695 THE WALDINGER CORP. 56t010.17 RETENTION J-4-2-1 063696 JOHN R: WAPLES 1372.20 - ODOR C-ONSULTIN6 G63697 CARL WARREN & CO. $53.31 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR C63698 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTEP 1448.33 ENGINE PARTS 063E99 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP 1155:56--'---_£LUTR_ CA _ IU FMS 063700 P. D. WHETSTONE 8 ASSOCIATES $963:00 COMPUTER PROGRAMMING 063701 WHITE, FINE B VERVILLE $29015.45 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 663702 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF $299.22' LEGAL SERVICES -�- - ---- "�- •' ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 $4079397 32 "` ------- ----- -- r •• I bd 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/15/83 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY � t CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 i I SUMMARY AMOUNT L., Di #2 OPER FUND $ 5, 100. 17 N2 ACO FUND 708.34 N3 OPER FUND 12,346.75 N5 OPER FUND 1 ,956.65 n N5 ACO FUND 1 ,345.00 N6 OPER FUND 1 .759.00 N1 OPER FUND 3,135.7! N7 ACO FUND 708.33 N11 OPER FUND 5,268.35 N11 ACO FUND 6,076.00 l0 N5E6 OPER FUND 1 ,067.40 N5&6 ACO FUND 1 ,572.00 #6s7 OPER FUND 3,535.70 D JT OPER FUND 188, 149.44 T CORF 113,633.08 r SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 4,553.31 di SELF FUNDED WORKERS' CONP. INSURANCE FUND 1 ,030.02 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 55.452.07 C.!) TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 $407,397' 32 �I C3 a' I I i 1 i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. Box 8127 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C.O. NO. 6 CONTRACTOR: Hoagland/Artukovich, A Joint Venture DATE: April 20, 1983 JOB: Flow Eaualization Facilities at Plant 2 (Basins) Job No. P2-25-1A Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) S 3,973.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deletions from the contract price are hereby approved: ITEM? A The Districts prequested that the Contractor install Steam Traps at all Steamer Connections. The Traps will remove condensate at those low points in the Steam Piping System. REFERENCE: E'd-251A-7 ADDED COSTS S 3,973.00 ITEM 3 The Contractor was granted a non-compensable extension of time of twenty (20) calendar days for delays caused by the unusual rains and the resulting un- suitable site conditions. The period that the unusual weather occurred was February 1, 1982 to February 2, 1983. REFERENCE: TE-251-1 ADDED COSTS .00 ,TE:•) C The Contractor was granted a non-compensable extension of time of nineteen calendar days for delays caused by unusual rains and the resulting unsuitable site conditions. The period that the unusual weather occured was February 3, 1983 to March 24, 1983. REFERENCE: TE-251-2 ADDED COSTS .00 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Date: November 26, 1981 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Oate:February 23, 1983 Time Extension This C.0.:39 Calendar Days TOTAL Time Extension: 127 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 492 Calendar Day,; Revised Completion Date: june 28- 19A3 Original Contract Price S 3,512,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes S 438,218.00 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 3,973.00 Amended Contract Price $ 3,954,191.00 Board Authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA Ey: By: Contractor Chief Engineer „C" ----AGENDA- ITEM- #10(A) — n i i D I c-rp r rTAS -- -- -- „C„ RESOLUTION NO. 83-53 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS `irk FOR SPECIFICATION NO. E-133 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIX (6) STANDARD SAMPLERS FOR PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, SPECIFICATION NO. E-133 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts NOs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Engineering Science, Districts' engineer, for Six (6) Standard Samplers for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. "D" AGENDA ITEM #10(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "D" April 25, 1983 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T JOB NO. PROJECT TITLE EMERGENCY REPAIR OF FROZEN PLUG VALVE ON AERATION BASIN DRAIN LINE PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide shored excavation for access to Job No. P1-16 aeration basin drain line; backfill, control groundwater, and replace surface improvements. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE$ BUDGET AMOUNT $ REMARKS Emergency work. Informal bids solicited from contractors working on-site. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Advanco Constructors Upland, CA $14,710 2. A.F. Smith and Sons y,d Long Beach, CA $15,000 3. Hoagland-Artukovich Long Beach, CA $20,300 I have reviewed the proposal submitted for the above emergency work and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend issuance of a purchase order to Advanco Constructors, In90Ma:SVMM,2. d, California, in the amount of $14,710.00. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer I concur with the above recommendation for emer y repair to aeration basin drain line a T�ewis Chief Engineer "E" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E" TELEPHONES: COUNTY SANITATIONS DISTRICT AREA DE 71A F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA � 962-241 O � I ' P. ❑. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10944 ELL15 AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY) April 28 , 1983 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject : Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No . 1 In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services , the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers in con- junction with Phase 1 preliminary design engineering services for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 : Fixed fee $ 36 , 000 . 00 Per diem rates and eligible overhead not to exceed 301 ,255 .00 Indirect costs 5 , 200 . 00 Total fees not to exceed $342, 455 . 00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Chairman Ron Pattinson , Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis , Chief Engineer Approved : Fred A. Harper , General Manager "F11 AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (1) (A) - ALL DISTRICTS "F" RESOLUTION NO. 83-54 `.✓ APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN (PHASE 1) OF HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 11 JOB NO. P1-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE PRELIMINARY DESIGN (PHASE 1) OF HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has bd certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase 1) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (1) (B) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Fixed Fee.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 36,000 Indirect Cost Reimbursement not to exceed.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,200 Director Labor including Eligible Overhead on a Per Diem Fee Basis not to exceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 301,255 TOTAL not to exceed.. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . $342,455 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (1) (B) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" _M1L71pti ✓� � TELEPHONES: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS at l �3 AREA CODE 714 540-29 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA , � 962-241101 P. O. BOX 6127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 28, 1983 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Desic_*n of Ocean Outfall Booster Pumping Station No. C In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services , the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers in con- junction with Phase 1 z�reliminary design engineering services for Ocean Outfall Booster Pumping Station No . C: �.d Fixed fee $ 29 ,000 . 00 Per diem rates and eligible overhead not to exceed 242, 894. 00 Indirect costs 4, 200 . 00 Total fees not to exceed $276 , 094. 00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Chairman Ron Pattinson, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Approved : Fred A. Harper, General Manager "H" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (2) (A) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" RESOLUTION NO. 83-55 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN (PHASE 1) OF OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE PRELIMINARY DESIGN (PHASE 1) OF OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase 1) of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: �.d "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (2) (B) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" Fixed Fee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 29,000 Indirect Cost Reimbursement not to exceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,200 Director Labor including Eligible Overhead on a Per Diem Fee Basis not to exceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242,894 TOTAL not to exceed.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $276,094 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (2) (B) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-59-2 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 43 - FORRESTER ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 43 - FORRESTER ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by Mr. & Mrs. Robert J. Forrester, owners of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 80-143-2, filed with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #`10(L) - DISTRICT 2 "K-1" amount of $762.96 has been satisfied; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99 (h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 2 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. Vr/ "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10 W - DISTRICT 2 "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS {_., ` ATE LE PHREA COODOE 71 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �� . 962-241 1 i P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9270E 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 27, 1983 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Design of Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer (on Katella from Western to Knott ) In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services , the Selection Committee has reviewed and approved the proposal and a lump sum fee in the amount of $35 , 000 . 00 , exclusive of surveys and soils investigation, for Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with the design of the Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer (on Katella from Western to Knott) . The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Frank J. Laszlo, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis , Chief Engineer Selection Committee Approved: Fred A. Harper, General Manager "L" AGENDA ITEM #,10(M) (1) (A) - DISTRICT 3 "L" RESOLUTION NO. 83-60-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF HOOVER-WESTERN RELIEF TRUNK SEWER ON KATELLA AVENUE FROM WESTERN TO KNOTT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF HOOVER-WESTERN RELIEF TRUNK SEWER ON KATELLA AVENUE FROM WESTERN TO KNOTT WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Katella Avenue from l.d Western to Knott; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and Lowry & Associates providing for design of the Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Katella Avenue from Western to Knott, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, for a lump sum fee of $35,000.00; and "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (1) (B) - DISTRICT 3 "M-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. 11M-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (1) (s) - DISTRICT 3 "M-2" TE LE PH ON COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o.r � ,. AREA CODE 4 540-291 O OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 962-2411 P. O. BOX 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY) April 27 , 1983 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Design of Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer (on Lampson from Western to Knott) In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has Vd reviewed and approved the proposal and a lump sum .fee in the amount of $22, 000 .00 , exclusive of surveys and soils investigation, for Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with the design of the Hoover Western Relief Trunk Sewer (on Lampson from Western to Knott) . The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Frank J. Laszlo, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Selection Committee Approved: Fred A. Harper, General Manager "N" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (2) (A) - DISTRICT 3 "N" RESOLUTION NO. 83-61-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES / RE DESIGN OF HOOVER-WESTERN RELIEF TRUNK SEWER ON LAMPSON AVENUE FROM WESTERN TO KNOTT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF HOOVER-WESTERN RELIEF TRUNK SEWER ON LAMPSON AVENUE FROM WESTERN TO KNOTT WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Lampson Avenue from Western to Knott; and, � WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and Lowry & Associates providing for design of the Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Lampson Avenue from Western to Knott, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, for a lump sum fee of r $22,000.00; and "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (2) (B) - DISTRICT 3 110-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby `%w-� authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General. Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. t 110-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (2) (B) - DISTRICT 3 110-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of{ ., , AREA CODE 1. 540-29 7 4 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ��,,'�' 962-241101 i P. o. 6❑X 9127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927❑6 10B44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 27 , 1983 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Design of Orange Western Trunk Sewer In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has reviewed and approved the proposal and a lump sum fee in the amount of $25 , 000 .00 , exclusive of surveys and soils investigation, for Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with the design of the Orange Western Trunk Sewer . The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Frank J. Laszlo, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Selection Committee Approved: Fred A. Harper, General Manager "P" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (3) (A) - DISTRICT 3 "P" RESOLUTION NO. 83-62-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF ORANGE-WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES RE DESIGN OF ORANGE-WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lowry & Associates for design of Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and Lowry & Associates providing for design of the Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, for a lump sum fee of $25,000.00; and Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General e Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. "Q" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) (3) (B) - DISTRICT 3 "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 83-63 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO THE IRVINE COMPANY RE ABANDONMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD PUMP STATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO THE IRVINE COMPANY RE ABANDONMENT OF THE JAMBOREE ROAD PUMP STATION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim Deed dated May 11, 1983, wherein County Sanitation District No. 5 quitclaims to The Irvine Company the abandoned Jamboree Road Pump Station facilities and easements in the city of Newport Beach, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real property hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. e "R" AGENDA ITEM #10(N) - DISTRICT 5 "R" RESOLUTION NO. 83-64-7 WAIVING AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION EXCHANGE ,M'°' WITH OTHER AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES RE ANNEXATION NO. 115 - K-P-S ANNEXATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION EXCHANGE WITH OTHER AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES RE ANNEXATION NO. 115 - K-P-S ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 8 of the California Legislature, 1979-80 Regular Session, provided, in part, for the implementation of Article XIIIA by enacting Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 95 through 100.5, inclusive, and further provided that prior to the effective date of certain jurisdictional changes, the governing bodies of all agencies whose service areas or service responsibilities would be altered by such change shall meet to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such affected agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said provisions the District has met and negotiated with the County of Orange to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between the District and agencies governed by the County Board of Supervisors for those areas located outside the jurisdiction of any sanitation district but within the tributary area; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors on June 9, 1982, approved the negotiated settlement with the County of Orange re tax exchanges on annexing properties, as recommended by the Select Committee re Negotiations for Tax Exchanges for New Annexations (AB 8) . NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: `vd Section 1. That in accordance with the terms and conditions of the negotiated "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(p) - DISTRICT 7 "S-1 settlement with the County of Orange concerning tax exchanges on annexing proper- ties, the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies for the following annexation: Annexation No. 115 - K-P-S Annexation to District No. 7 Section 2. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Local Agency Formation Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. t "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(P) - DISTRICT 7 "S-2" PETITION FOR ANNEXATIO',: Date : -//-/! ' TO: Board of Directors �..,� County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 I (thQ , the undersigned landowner () , do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex Ilse acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of Gritory to the District located in the vicinity of MLTACS AUJ * kVl ALA- '3T'gz -r (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of Coypr.1 04 DrbA 1_)C- (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) , more particularly described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District' s anp.exation procedures . The street address of this property The reason for the proposed annexation is: ?(Zyo (oc 5AAzirA4/ SaryL-m- -r-,) 1� t 6 sc- Said property is r tiAA3iT-e p (Inhabited or uninhabited) . Number of registered voters , if any: Z The assessed value of the property is : Z3 $,poo DISTRICT 7 ONLY: If the local sewering agency for the proposed develop- ment is the 7th or 70th Sewer Maintenance District, said property must also be annexed to the appropriate Sewer Maintenance District. Accordingly, enclosed herewith are the legal description and map for �..d annexation to the 7 r (7th or 70th) Sewer Maintenance District. Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500 . 00 repre- senting payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ONLY: A $500 .00 per. lot service charge is due for developed reside al properties . Accordingly, included herewith is payment in the amount of $ Soo. for said service charge for / lot (s) . (For developed properties other than residential, the service charge will be calculated by the District upon receipt of application. ) Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: 4 Z72a t-- Tele: Tele: 71y�'yy�y9A� SIGNA ,OF LANDOWN R DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER x Z//� Name (Typed or printe ) "T" AGENDA ITEM #10(a) - DISTRICT 7 "T" Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 5 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE _ April 22, 1983 JOB: COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) $ 80,483.58 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. Between 6th Street and 8th Street in Walnut Avenue, the removal of pavement damaged the City of Huntington Beach's existing lighting conduit at various undisclosed locations. Beacuse the conduit is part of a series electrical grid, immediate repair was requested by the City. The repair work, per Contractor's invoices Nos. 2670, 2671, 2672, 2673, 2681, 2682, 2683, 2687, 2688 and 2689 and as evaluated in Districts April 22, 1983 letter per Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, was in accordance with District's specifications and City requirements. Payment, in accordance with District's evaluation of invoices, is for the lump sum amount of. . . . $ 4,410.48 2. The Contractor is directed to remove unstable subbase material encountered adjacent to undisclosed oil and electric utilities parallel to the pipe line at areas directed by the Engineer and in accordance with City of Huntington Beach recommendations. The charges per Contractor's invoices Nos. 2674, 2675, 2676, 2677, 2678, and 2679 are in accordance with Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, and District specifications. The charges for the removal and disposal of the unsuitable material and replacement with base material are included for the lump sum amount of. . . . 5,479.66 3. In the alley between 6th Street and 7th Street, three steel oil lines not shown on the Plans were encountered. The Contractor was delayed in laying pipe and in the construction of the manhole at Station 192+13. The Contractor is allowed extra work for the additional time required and for adjustments required because of the oil lines. Charges are in accordance with Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, the District's specifications, and Field Change Order No. 6, for the lump sum amount of. . . . 6,884.32 "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (2) - DISTRICT 11 "U-1" Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 5 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE April 22, 1983 JOB: COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (B `_) $ 80,483.58 4. The City of Huntington Beach requested several changes in grade between Main Street and 7th Street on Walnut Avenue requiring regrading of the street by the Contractor. Contractor is allowed the additional charges for regrading, in accordance with Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, City requirements, and Field Change Orders Nos. 7 and 10, for the lump sum amount of. . . . 14,186.67 5. to the alley between 7th Street and 8th Street, several undisclosed oil lines were encountered. The Plans called for the construction of a 48-inch manhole over the City's `..� sewer line located in the alley and a connection from the new City manhole to the District manhole on the Coast Trunk. The new City manhole was deleted because of in- adequate construction room caused by the oil lines and a direct connecction to an existing City manhole was installed. The Contractor is allowed the additional costs of installing the 8-inch VCP connection and cleanout, in accordance with Field Change Order No. 9 and Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, for the lump sum amount of. . . . 1,789.48 The existing City manhole will be remodeled in accordance with the prices set forth on Bid Item No. 12; the connector pipe installed in accordance with Bid Item No. 13, and the new manhole deleted in accordance with Bid Item No. 11. The cost will be adjusted on the final change order for adjustment of Engineer's quantities. 6. The Contractor was delayed at Stations 195+14 due to two undisclosed 3-inch oil lines located on the north side of the streets. The oil lines leaked oil and water into the subgrade requiring removal of subbase and repair of the leaking lines. Charges are in accordance with Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, Field Change Order No. 11, and District instructions, for the lump sum amount of. . . . 307.95 "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (2) - DISTRICT 11 "U-2" Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 5 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE April 22, 1983 JOB: COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) -(Bedect) $ 80,483.58 7. Between 17th Street and 18th Street, the excavation uncovered approximately 60 trench crossings, 15 parallel lines within the trench and 1 private sewer system, all undisclosed. The Contractor was directed to remove and replace certain lines, remove abandoned lines, and protect in place other lines as could best be determined at the site. The Contractor is allowed time and material charges for the testing of lines and required work as directed, all in accordance with Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions. Certain lines which were removed will be replaced at a later date, also under Extra Work. The work is in accordance with the General Provisions and Field Change Order No. 12, for the lump sum amount of. . . . 33,940.44 S. Six undisclosed oil lines were found in the alley between loth Street and llth Street at approximately Station 205+10. The Contractor is allowed charges for delays, and for protection of the live oil facilities, in accordance with Field Change Order No. 13 and Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions, for the lump sum amount of. . . . 11,227.08 9. In the intersection of llth Street and Walnut Avenue, the Contractor is allowed a delay in pipe backfilling and com- pacting for the protection of an undisclosed oil line not shown on the Plans. The work is in accordance with Section 10-4, Extra Work, of the General Provisions and Field Change Order No. 14, for the lump sum amount of... . 2,257.50 TOTAL ADD: $80,483.58 "U-3" AGENDA ITEM #10 0) (2) - DISTRICT 11 "U-3" Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELMS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 5 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE April 22, 1983 JOB: COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduct) $ 80,483.58 10. The Contractor is granted a time extension of 10 calendar days for delays encountered in performing the above Extra Work. . . . 10 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date June 10, 1982 Original Contract Time 330 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 5, 1983 Time Extension This C.O. 10 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 145 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 475 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date September 27, 1983 Original Contract Price $ 3,040,523.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 71,101.87 This Change (Add) B $ 80,483.58 Amended Contract Price $3,192,108.45 Board authorization date: May 11, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By 5/2/83 By 5/2/83 STEVE BUBALO Contractor Chief Engineer CONSTRUCTION COMPANY '.id "U-4 AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (2) - DISTRICT 11 "U-4" RESOLUTION NO. 83-56 APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ENERGY COALITION RE PLANT NO. 2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMBERSHIP IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ENERGY COALITION RE PARTICIPATION IN ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AT PLANT NO. 2 AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, endorse a policy of energy conservation and cost savings; and, WHEREAS, in pursuit of such energy conservation and cost savings, the Boards engaged the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. in April, 1981, to evaluate alternatives for establishing a cooperative electric peak leveling program; and, WHEREAS, said evaluation concluded that the Districts could realize annual energy cost rebates by participating in the Southern California Energy Coalition (SCEC) ; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said evaluation, the Boards of Directors on January 13, 1982, authorized membership in SCEC and in said electric load management program by Plant No. 1, which is now accruing annual energy cost rebates of approximately $20,000; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to further evaluation by the Districts, it is now anticipated that by connecting Plant No. 2 to SCEC, the Districts could also realize additional annual energy cost rebates of approximately $65,000 per year by participating in said electric load management program. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #`-13(A) - ALL DISTRICTS 11V-1" Section 1. That participation in the Southern California Energy Coalition's �.d electric load management program at Plant No. 2, be, and is hereby, authorized and approved; and, Section 2. That payment of implementation costs in the amount of $13,252 be, and is hereby, authorized and approved; and that the Orange County Auditor-Controller be, and is hereby, directed to pay said costs upon submittal of a warrant by the Districts; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute any necessary documents in connection with Plant No. 2's participation in the Southern California Energy Coalition, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. r.d "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-57 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) RE 1983 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RE 1983 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM FOR PAINTING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That a 1983 Summer Work Program for painting, groundskeeping and general cleanup work around the treatment plant facilities is hereby authorized and established; and, Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add temporary, part-time classifications thereto, as set forth be low: Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Rate Salary EXHIBIT "B-4" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS 30640 Part-time Assistant - Groundskeeper 10 --- $5.00/Hr. Max --- 30645 Part-time Assistant - 30 --- $5.00/Hr. Max --- and that the General Manager is authorized to employ temporary, part-time personnel in said classification; and, Section 3. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further .amended to add the temporary position classifications thereto, as set forth below: "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(B) - ALL DISTRICTS 11W-1" Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary EXHIBIT "B-4" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Foreman Crew Leader 1 1061G --- 2069/2577 Painter III 1 1059A --- 1780/2216 Crew Leader Painter I 2 1056 --- 1501/1868 Crew Leader Utility Painter 1 1054F --- 1400/1743 Crew Leader Groundskeeper II 1 1055E --- 1470/1830 Crew Leader Groundskeeper I 1 1054F --- 1400/1743 Crew Leader `.�►' and that the General Manger is hereby authorized to temporarily upgrade full-time, permanent employees to said temporary classifications; and, Section 4. That the authorized annual expenditure for said Summer Work Program should not exceed $172,000; and, Section 5. That Resolution No. 82-52 is hereby rescinded; and, Section 6. That any other resolution or motion that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 7. That the authorizations contained herein shall become effective June 10, 1983, and terminate September 29, 1983. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-2" CITIZEN A.%1B.ASS.AI)OR PROGIZ,A\1 rto, — Dwight D. Lruenhower liuil ' '=� ! South 110 herrall Street / TAf:�t Spokane,Washington 99220-4047 (5 091 5 34.04 30 NORMAN J. SWANSON April 19, 1983 Tclex: 326328 DIRECTOR Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: A few days ago you received a letter from Mr. Ron M. Linton regard- ing a People-to-People Wastwater Treatment Technology Delegation to the People's Republic of China this fall. On the recommendation of our Execu- tive Committee, Mr. Linton has been appointed delegation leader for this project. He has asked me to write you with further information about People-to-People. The People-to-People effort officially began in 1956 with this announcement by President Eisenhower: "I am initiating a broad-scale People-to-People program - an effort to stimulate private citizens in many fields; the arts, education, law, medicine, business . . . to reach across the seas and national boundaries to their counterparts in other lands." This effort seeks to promote the spirit of international coopera- tion and understanding by encouraging personal communication at all levels. The success of the program ultimately depends upon those Americans who as citizen ambassadors will reach out to inspire and revitalize faith in these principles. The Citizen Ambassador Program is based on the philosophy that poli- tical and cultural barriers are overcome by the universal desire to exchange ideas and information on a professional level. We work toward these goals by developing and administering professional, scientific and technical exchanges between interested countries. These exchanges allow Americans and their counterparts to share professional expertise and gain valuable insight into each other's culture. The overall intent is to strengthen the bonds of friendship between nations, stressing the areas of common interest. This project is much more than just a goodwill mission; it is a focused program of professional exchange and cultural orientation. Substantial time overseas will be spent in professional seminars and symposia, technical discussion sessions, institution and facility visits, field trips and informal meetings and social gatherings with foreign colleagues. In addition, the delegation will have a supplementary pro- gram of cultural activities, which will be augmented for the spouses who participate. "A voluntary effort of private citizens to advance the cause of international friendship" "X-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(e)-ALL D I STS P-ighht D. Eisenhower, Founder "X-1" Page 2 As Mr. Linton indicated in his letter to you, these are the major discussion areas for this project: 1. Determining and achieving water quality 2. Wastewater treatment 3. Pretreatment principles 4. Sludge disposal S. Research and development 6. Operation and maintenance 7. Financing Presentations on these and other topics will be made by representatives from both sides, and will serve to provide the basis for discussion sessions. The success of any People-to-People project is due, in large part, to the individual delegates themselves; the make-up of this delegation will have a direct impact on the professional benefits derived by each team member. Although the major criteria for acceptance of delegates will be their professional background and experience, ability and willingness to contribute on a people-to-people level is also of considerable importance. The attached application form for membership in the delegation should be completed and returned to us as soon as possible. Once your partici- pation is confirmed, our technical information staff will be in touch to provide you with information on the professional exchange and to coor- dinate the development and dissemination of biographical and technical information with you prior to the project. Both Mr. Linton and I hope that you can become a member of this dele- gation. If you cannot, I would appreciate your advising either Mr. Linton or me. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE CITIZEN AMBASSADOR PROGRAM Michael E. Lehan Deputy Director Project Administration MEL:pj Enclosures 'WSW/ "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-58 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-23-6 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MAJOR FACILITIES FOR 75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-6 AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, H. C. Smith Construction Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, on May 11, 1983; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts'. Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 29, 1977. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 11, 1983. `asJ e fly„ AGENDA ITEM #15(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "y" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 3, S, 67 l AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 13, 1983 �., �y1T9TIp11T U m C ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA e.d ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on April 13, 1983 at 7:30 p.m. , in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum 1*'present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: X Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank X Robert Luxembourger, Chairman pro tem Gordon Bricken X Don Saltarelli Richard Edgar Roger Stanton X Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 2: X Henry Wedaa, Chairman Todd Murphy Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. X Barbara Brown Ben Nielsen X Sam Cooper Norma Hicks X Donald Holt Robert Kuznik X Carol Kawanami William Odlum X Robert Luxembourger Gorden Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bob Perry Norman Culver X Don Smith Gene Beyer X Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: X Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Roland Edwards X Frank Laszlo, Chairman pro tem Willemke Vanderstaay X Marvin Adler Ben Nielsen X Norman Culver Bob Perry X Henry Frese Norma Seidel X Don Griffin James Jarrell X Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken X Robert Mandic, Jr. Ruth Finley X Gerald Mullen Otto Lacayo Carrey Nelson X Sam Cooper X Charles Rell Frank Marshott X Earl Roget Dorothy Wedel Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. X Charles Sylvia Kenneth Zommick X Harriett Wieder Bruce Nestande X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: X Evelyn Hart, Chairman John Cox X Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tern Bill Agee X Thomas Riley Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: X Elvin Hutchison, Chairman Orma Crank X Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart Roger Stanton X Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 7: X Richard Edgar, Chairman Don Saltarelli X Don Smith, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer Jacqueline Heather X Evelyn Hart X Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran X James Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: X Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister X Harriett Wieder, Chairman pro tem Bruce Nestande X Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister -2- 4/13/83 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J . Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Ray E. Lewis, William N. Clarke, Tom Dawes, Rita Brown, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Lee Terry, Steve Chandler, Jim Benzie OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Harvey Hunt, Pete Barotti, Paul Torres, Ron Larson, Jess Valverde, Dick Durkee, Bob Bertrand * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Ap roval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There. being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be, deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the- Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- � 4/13/83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt briefed the Directors on Report of the Joint Chairman the activities of various Board committees. He noted that the Report and Recommendations of the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts, the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee in response to the 1981-82 Orange County Grand Jury Study on Special Districts had been approved by the Joint Boards at their last meeting. He advised directors that later in the agenda they would be considering Resolution No. 83-34, to adopt a policy urging each member agency to appoint a single Director to represent all Districts of which the agency is a member as recommended in the report. Adoption of this resolution would reduce the current number of Directors from 39 to 26. The Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach would continue to have two members in Districts 5 and 11 respectively, to remain in compliance with the three-member minimum Board requirement set forth in State law. Chairman Holt also advised the Directors that the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts and the Fiscal Policy Committee held a joint meeting prior to the meeting of the Joint Boards to consider the financial and other aspects of consolidating the seven existing Sanitation Districts into one single District. He indicated that the committees had approved consolidation to one District in concept. The committees will be reporting their findings to the Executive Committee. The Joint Chairman reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee had recently initiated a review of the 1983-84 budgets. He advised that the committee had also considered and recommended to the Executive Committee that the staff be authorized to conduct a trial of a standby odor control system at Plant No. 2; and that the Districts purchase earthquake and flood protection insurance for the Districts' facilities. Both items appear on the agenda for consideration. Mr. Holt then advised the Directors that in order to comply with EPA regulations, the Districts must amend the existing industrial waste ordinance passed in 1976 by June 1 to take effect on July 1, 1983. He indicated that the staff had briefed the Executive Committee on the proposed amendments at their March 30 meeting and had also met on April 12 with an ad hoc committee representing the industrial community served by the Districts. The Chairman also called the Directors' attention to the hearing process currently being carried out by the State Water Resources Control Board to amend the California Ocean Plan. The Ocean Plan, established in 1972 and last amended in 1978, sets standards for wastewater discharge off the California coast, and its provisions can significantly impact Districts' operations. He indicated that the Districts have participated in the formation of an ad hoc group of agencies called the California Ocean Dischargers, which includes virtually all the major agencies discharging wastewater to the ocean. Mr. Holt reported that the group has prepared fourteen position papers addressing various elements of the proposed amendments, which he urged the Directors to support by adopting Resolution No. 83-33. Holt also advised the Directors that he would testify before the State Board on behalf of the Districts on April 21 on the proposed amendments to the Ocean Plan. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, April 27th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Carol Rawanami and Robert Luxembourger to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Holt also advised the Directors that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, April 28, at 4:30 p.m. -4- 4/13/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District,,, claims set forth on Pages "A" and "B", attach hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 3 09 83 3 23/83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $232,857.49 $289,969.92 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 269,523.91 84,458.60 Joint Working Capital Fund - 56,491.72 120,712.05 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 6,455.66 3,812.31 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 117.86 22.79 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,204.72 5,160.45 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 545.94 13,973.35 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 914.39 6,645.98 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 226.78 104.92 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 2,155.91 5,666.30 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 210,279.11 8,144.67 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 37,800.44 3,829.24 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,004.83 16.14 $822,578.76 $542,516.72 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Initial Study re �.✓ Job No. P2-26 That the Initial Study, prepared in accordance with CEQA guidelines regarding Primary Basins P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, finding that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directing staff to prepare a Nega- tive Declaration re Job No. P2-26 That staff be, and is hereby directed to prepare a Negative Declaration upon receipt of comments from affected agencies, declaring that construction of Primary Basins P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, will not have a significant effect on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. I-2R-1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-30, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase I. Adams Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Job No. I-2R-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. `ash -5- 4/13/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. I-BR-I That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-31, approving plans and specifications for Manhole Repair, Interplant Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8R-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. P1-19-2 specifications for Construction of Containment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-2, authorizing an addition of $754.18 to the contract with A. F. Smith & Sons Construction Company for extension of walkway and installation of four hydraulic hoses, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. P1-19-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-32, accepting Construction of Containment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-085 specifications for Bulk Chlorine Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-085, authorizing an addition of $8,471.55 to the contract with R.J.W. Construction Company, Inc. for removal and replacement of fill material and installation of stairs at Plant No. 2 and granting a time extension of 23 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-094 specifications for Tunnel Access Man Ladders and Distribution Box Handrail at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-094, authorizing an addition of $1,231.44 to the contract with Industrial Maintenance Specialists, Inc. for revisions relative to installation of the handrail and granting a time extension of 76 calendar days because of fabrication delays, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-094 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-51, accepting Tunnel Access Man Ladders and Distribution Box Handrail at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-094, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- 4/13/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Joint Chairman to attend the AMSA annual members' That the Joint Chairman be, and is meeting in Lake of the Ozarks, hereby, authorized to attend the Missouri Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' annual members' meeting, May 20-25, 1983, at the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase order to American Hi-Lift for purchase of That staff, be, and is hereby, One Battery Operated, Self- authorized to issue a purchase order to Propelled, Scissor Lift, American Hi-Lift for the purchase of Specification No. A-114 One, Battery-Operated, Self-Propelled, Scissor Lift, Specification No. A-114, for the negotiated price of $15,210.00 plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase order to Motorola Corporation for Purchase That staff, be, and is hereby, of Two-Way Radio Equipment, authorized to issue a purchase order to Specification No. E-131 Motorola Corporation for purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment, Specification No. E-131, for the negotiated price of $25,073.00 plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase order to Interox America for hydrogen That staff, be, and is hereby, authorized to peroxide transfer/purchase re issue a purchase order to Interox America for Specification No. P-054 transfer of existing District inventory of 3,500 gallons to be used for sulfide control at the Plant No. 2 belt-filter press sludge-dewatering operation, re Specification No. P-054, for a maximum amount not to exceed $14,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on March 30, 1983, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving the trial of a ferric chloride standby odor control sys- That the trial of a ferric chloride tem at Plant No. 2 and authorizing standby odor control system at Plant No. acquisition of chemicals and 2, be, and is hereby approved; and, equipment rental, Specification No. P-055 FURTHER MOVED: That acquisition of chemicals and equipment rental for a total amount not to exceed $115,500.00, Specification No. P-055, be, and is hereby, authorized. -7- 4/13/83 ALL DISTRICTS Following a brief staff presentation and dis- Authorizing staff to replace the cussion among the Directors regarding the current risk insurance policy with potential level of Federal assistance available all-risk coverage, including to the Districts in the event of a major earthquake and flood protection natural disaster such as a flood or earthquake, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to replace the current risk insurance policy with all-risk coverage, including earthquake and flood protection, for an annual estimated premium of $187,500.00, for coverage as follows: Facilities Covered: Treatment plants, pump stations, sewers and outfalls. Limit of Coverage: $150,000,000 Deductibles: Earthquake $500,000 Flood 25,000 Other 5,000 Director Saltarelli requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to purchase a steam cleaner, Specification No. That staff be, and is hereby, authorized E-132, and to lend steam cleaner to purchase a steam cleaner, Specification No. and a motor grader to County of _ E-132, at a cost not to exceed $20,000; and, Orange re mitigation of landfill sludge disposal impacts FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to lend said steam cleaner and an existing District motor grader to the County's General Service Agency, Solid Waste Division, to accommodate mitigation of impacts on the County's Coyote Canyon landfill operation associated with the direct burial of Districts' sludge. ALL DISTRICTS The Assistant General Manager and Chief Receive and file Staff Report re Engineer outlined the impact of the proposed proposed amendments to Districts' amendments to the Districts' 1976 industrial Uniform Ordinance Establishing waste ordinance that must be adopted by the Regulations for Use of District Joint Boards by June 1, 1983 to comply with EPA Sewerage Facilities regulations. They called attention to some of the major changes highlighted in the Draft Ordinance in the Directors' agenda folders, including: incorporation of the EPA pretreatment standards into the ordinance and establishment of an excess capacity charge for new, high volume discharges, or existing industries that significantly expand their facilities and increase their discharge levels. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report and Summary of Changes to Districts' Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. IMP/ -8- 4/13/84 ALL DISTRICTS The Assistant General Manager outlined the Approving schedule and fixing implementation schedule for adoption of amend- hearing for adoption of amendments ments to Districts' Uniform Ordinance Estab- to Districts' Uniform Ordinance lishing Regulations for Use of District Establishing Regulations for Use Sewerage Facilities, and called the Directors' of District Sewerage Facilities attention to the adjourned meeting of the Joint Boards on June 1, 1983 for the purpose of final adoption of the ordinance. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the schedule for adoption of amendments to the Districts' Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities as outlined in the Staff Report and Summary of Changes, be, and is hereby approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That May 11, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. , be, and is hereby established as the date and time for a hearing on proposed amendments to the Districts' Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and that the second reading and final adoption of said ordinance shall be made at an adjourned meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS The Assistant General Manager reported that the Supporting position papers of State Water Resources Control Board is in the the California Ocean Dischargers process of considering amendments to the re the State Water Resources California Ocean Plan. The Districts generally Control Board's proposed amend- support the proposed amendments to the Plan, ments to the California Ocean Plan which establishes standards for wastewater discharges to the ocean, and are pleased with the positive approach of the State Board. However, there are several issues in theme amendments of concern to coastal wastewater agencies that we feel must be addressed. The Districts, in cooperation with the other major agencies discharging to the ocean, have formed an ad hoc group, The California Ocean Dischargers (COD) , that has developed a series of position papers responding to the major issues raised by the proposed amendments. He then called upon Blake Anderson, Districts' Director of Operations and Co-Chairman of COD, who udpated the Directors on the proposed amendments. Mr. Anderson indicated that the major concern of all the coastal agencies was that achievement of compliance with some of the unnecessarily restrictive standards would impose major construction costs on the agencies. The Plan doesn't allow for case-by-case flexibility that takes into consideration the differing oceanographic conditions along the California coast. He highlighted three of COD's 14 position papers that most affect the Districts, including: - Limits established for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) - Limits established for effluent suspended solids (SS) - Ocean disposal of sludges from municipal wastewater treatment facilities. He also called the Directors' attention to Footnote 16 to the Plan, which would allow ocean disposal of sewage sludge under certain conditions. Inclusion of this footnote in the Plan indicates a recognition on the part of the State Board staff that a 11a.$) -9- 4/13/83 comprehensive assessment of the environmental effects of all possible methods of sludge disposal, including ocean disposal, is necessary before establishing a blanket `.� prohibition on any one method. Mr. Anderson noted that the Districts and the ad hoc group strongly support the State staff on this issue and will be presenting our case to the State Board at the hearings on the proposed amendments in Sacramento on April 21. Following questions and a brief discussion, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-33, supporting the position papers of the California Ocean Dischargers (COD) relative to the State Water Resources Control Board's proposed amendments to the California Ocean Plan. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The Directors entered into a discussion on Adopting a policy urging each mem- proposed policy Resolution No. 83-34, urging ber agency to have a single Direc- each member agency to have a single Director for represent all Districts of represent all Districts of which the agency is which the agency is a member a member. The policy is recommended in the Report and Recommendations on the 1981-82 Orange County Grand Jury Study and Report on Special Districts submitted by the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts and the Fiscal Policy Committee, endorsed by the Executive Committee, and approved by the Joint Boards at the March 9, 1983 meeting. \Wo/ All member agencies served by the Districts would continue to be fully represented on the Boards under this structure, however, the current Directorship would be reduced from 39 to 26 members. The Cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach would still have two representatives in Districts 5 and 11 respectively, to comply with the three-member Board required by State law. After a clarification of the procedures to be followed in voting on the proposed policy, it was moved and seconded that Resolution No. 83-34, approving a policy urging each member agency to have a single Director represent all Districts of which the agency is a member, be adopted. Following a roll call vote, the Joint Chairman announced that the Joint Resolution had passed by virtue of five Districts voting in favor thereof, and two Districts in opposition. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Culver requested that the record reflect that his vote in opposition to the Resolution was at the direction of the Garden Grove Sanitary District Board. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:16 p.m., the Boards convened in Convene in closed session re closed session to discuss possible possible litigation in connection litigation in connection with Job No. with Job No. P2-23-6 P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:35 p.m., the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. -10- 4/13/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Denying claim of H. C. Smith Construction Co. , contractor re That the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Job No. P2-23-6 Company, Contractor re Job No. P2-23-6, Majo� Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, for a $7,289,957.70 addition to the contract amount, be, and is hereby denied. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase order to ISCO, Inc. for a six-month trial That staff be, and is hereby, authorized demonstration of in-pipe flow to issue a purchase order to ISCO, Inc. _monitoring devices _ for an amount not to exceed $11,000.00 plus tax and freight, for a six-month trial demonstration of in-pipe flow monitoring devices on two selected sewers, said cost to be shared equally by Districts 2 and 3. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request from Brian and Beverly Cohen_ re That the request from Brian and Beverly proposed Annexation No. 57 - Cohen for annexation of .505 acres of Cohen Annexation territory to the District in the vicinity of Owens Drive and Mohler Drive in the city of Anaheim, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing initiation of proceed- ings re proposed Annexation No. That the Board of Directors hereby 57 - Cohen Annexation adopts Resolution No. 83-35-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .505 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Owens Drive and Mohler Drive in the city of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 57 - Cohen Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other That the Board of Directors hereby affected agencies re Annexation adopts Resolution No. 83-36-2, waiving No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected agencies re Annexation No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2, pursuant to terms of negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lowry & Assoc- certification re final negotiated fee iates for design of Modifications with Lowry & Associates for design of to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -11- 4/13/83 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Modifica- That the Board of Directors hereby tions to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump adopts Resolution No. 83-37-2, approving Station agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, for a lump sum of $25,000 plus outside services, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $6,750. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lowry & Assoc- certification re final negotiated fee iates for design of Orangethorpe with Lowry and Associates for design of Trunk Connection to Santa Ana Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to Santa River Interceptor Ana River Interceptor, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Orange That the Board of Directors hereby thorpe Trunk Connection to Santa adopts Resolution No. 83-38-2, approving Ana River Interceptor agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to Santa Ana River Interceptor, for a lump. sum of $10,000 plus outside services, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $4,200.00. A certified copy �.d of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lowry & Assoc- certification re final negotiated fee iates for preliminary engineering with Lowry & Associates for preliminary services re design of Haster Trunk engineering services re design of Haster Sewer and Connection to the Santa Trunk Sewer and Connection to the Santa Ana River Interceptor River Interceptor, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lowry & Associates for preliminary engin- That the Board of Directors hereby eering services re design of adopts Resolution No. 83-39-2, approving Haster Trunk Sewer and Connection agreement with Lowry & Associates for to the Santa Ana River Intercep- preliminary engineering services re for design of Haster Trunk Sewer and Connection to the Santa Ana River Interceptor, for a lump sum of $150,000 plus outside services, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $12,500. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: � Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:36 p.m. , April 13, 1983. -12- 4/13/83 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re Contract No. 5-12-2 and 5-18R That the Staff Report dated April 7, (Rebid) 1983, re Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer from Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-12-2, and Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 5-12-2 specifications for Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer from Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-12-2, authorizing an addition of $15,744.64 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for miscellaneous modifications and additional work, and granting a time extension of 307 calendar days due to delays as a result of manufacturer-suggested pressure testing, repairing and replacing the connections, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Contract No. 5-12-2 specifications for Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer from Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-12-2, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $9,056.50 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 5-12-2 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-43-5, accepting Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer from Dover Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-12-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Rehabilita- tion and Relocation of Pacific That the bid tabulation and Coast Highway Sewer from Bay recommendation to award contract for Bridge Pump Station to Dover Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid)_ Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , to Russco Construction, Inc. in the total amount of $836,585.40, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-44-5, awarding contract for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) to Russco Construction, Inc. in the total amount of $836,585.40. -13- 4/13/83 A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Joint Use Agreement with the State of California re reloca- That the Board of Directors hereby tion of Sewer Trunk "B", Unit 7, adopts Resolution No. 83-45-5, approving U22er Newport Bay Crossing, Joint Use Agreement with the State of Contract No. 5-18 California in connection with relocation of Sewer Trunk "B", Unit 7, Upper Newport Bay Crossing, Contract No. 5-18, required to accommodate construction of the Pacific Coast Highway Upper Newport Bay Bridge, quitclaiming the area of the old sewer easement and accepting an easement from the State for the newly relocated section, at no cost to the District. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:36 p.m., April 13, 1983. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Boyle Engin- certification re final negotiated fee eering Corporation for preliminary with Boyle Engineering Corporation for �d engineering services re the preliminary engineering services Fairview-Gisler Trunk Sewer relative to the Fairview-Gisler Trunk Sewer, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with BoXe Engineering Corporation for That the Board of Directors hereby preliminary engineering services adopts Resolution No. 83-46-6, approving re the Fairview-Gisler Trunk Sewer agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preliminary engineering services relative to the Fairview-Gisler Trunk Sewer, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $112,954.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:36 p.m., April 13, 1983. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 91 - Smith Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-47-7, ordering `.d annexation of 1.186 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Orange Park Boulevard and Amapola Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 91 - Smith Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -14- 4/13/83 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Chairman of the District to execute a Letter of That the Chairman of the District, be, Understanding with the City of and is hereby, authorized to execute a Orange re sewer service for pro- Letter of Understanding with the City of perties annexing to the District Orange relative to sewer service for in the Orange Park Acres area properties annexing to the District in the Orange Park Acres area. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving and authorizing execu- tion of Reimbursement Agreement That the Board of Directors hereby with the City of Orange re Tustin- adopts Resolution No. 83-50-7, approving Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 19 and authorizing execution of a Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement (Master Plan) with the City of Orange to reimburse the City for actual cost, not to exceed $70,000.00, of constructing the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 19, to provide sewer. service to the proposed Rancho Santiago Community College and surrounding tributary properties. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification for final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Boyle Engin- certification re final negotiated fee eering Corporation re design of with .Boyle Engineering Corporation re Airport Relief Trunk Sewer design of Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. � DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design That the Board of Directors hereby of Airport Relief Trunk Sewer adopts Resolution No. 83-48-7, approving agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Airport Relief Trunk Sewer, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $122,043.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Boyle Engin- certification re final negotiated fee eering Corporation for design of with Boyle Engineering Corporation for South Irvine Lift Station and design of South Irvine Lift Station and Relief Subtrunk Relief Subtrunk, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for That the Board of Directors hereby design of South Irvine Lift adopts Resolution No. 83-49-7, approving Station and Relief Subtrunk agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of South Irvine Lift Station and Relief Subtrunk, on a per diem fee basis, for a total amount not to exceed $132,337.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -15- 4/13/83 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:36 p.m., April 13, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Contract No. 11-13-3 specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, authorizing an addition of $37,446.69 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company for miscellaneous modifications and additional work and granting a time extension of 5 calendar days for said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:36 p.m. , April 13, 1983. DISTRICT 1 Districts' staff presented a verbal report to Directing staff not to issue new the Directors regarding the status of discharge permit to V.A.L. compliance with the Stipulation entered into by Circuits without specific Board the Districts and V.A.L. Circuits after the action authorizing permit issuance Board had revoked V.A.L. Circuits' discharge permit at the February, 1983 Board meeting. V.A.L. Circuits has yet to comply with all the provisions called for in the Stipulation. The staff recommended that the Board not issue a new permit to V.A.L. Circuits when their temporary permit expires on April 14, 1983 because the company had not yet installed permanent pretreatment facilities or sampling sites as required in the Stipulation. Following a discussion of V.A.L. Circuits' continued non-compliance with District requirements and the terms of the Stipulated Agreement, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be directed not to issue a new discharge permit to V.A.L. Circuits without further Board authorization. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., April 13, 1983. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-23R That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-42-3, approving ..d plans and specifications for Manhole Repair, Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-23R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -16- 4/13/83 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Comm- ittee to negotiate with Lowry & That the Selection Committee, be, and is Associates re design of Orange- hereby, authorized to negotiate with Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer and Lowry and Associates re design of the Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer and the Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer projects. DISTRICT 3 This being the time and place fixed for Hearing and actions on revocation the hearing on proposed revocation of of Industrial Waste Permit No. Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-135 3-135 issued to Arnold Circuits issued to Arnold Circuits on July 1, 1976, the Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:54. The General Counsel reported that this hearing was being conducted in accordance with procedures set forth in Ordinance No. 305, and that a notice pertaining to the date and time of the hearing had been served on Arnold Circuits. The General Counsel then briefed the Directors on the history of the Districts' actions re Arnold Circuits. He indicated that Arnold Circuits has had a record of violations of the District's permit limits for virtually all of the samples taken over the six year period during which the company has held a discharge permit. The Districts entered into an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) with the company in 1980, but the company had not fully complied with the requirements of the ECSA. The staff continued to work with Arnold Circuits to bring them into compliance, but these efforts have been unsuccessful since the initial ECSA. In January, 1983 an intent of revocation notice was issued, and a staff level hearing was held. Mr. Woodruff advised the Directors that Mr. Robert Bertrand, President of Arnold Circuits, had signed a Stipulation Agreement setting forth certain findings relative to Arnold's non-compliance and terms and conditions that the firm must meet within 120 days. He recommended that the Board approve the agreement estabishing the findings and facts re Arnold Circuits Industrial Waste Permit No. 3-135, revoking the permit, but temporarily suspend the revocation for 120 days during which the company is obligated to install necessary facilities to bring its discharge into full compliance. The company will post a $5,000 cash bond as required by the Stipulation to pay for Districts' staff monitoring, sampling, and enforcement activities during this period. If the company fails to achieve compliance within the 120 days, its permit will be revoked and be disconnected from the sewer. Staff Report re status of Arnold Steve Chandler, Industrial Waste Circuits Inspector, outlined the major elements of the staff report provided to the Directors relative to the compliance status of Arnold Circuits, and gave a slide presentation highlighting the staff's reasons for recommending revocation of Arnold Circuits' industrial waste discharge permit. During the presentation, Inspector Chandler indicated that Arnold Circuits had routinely been in violation of the Districts' ordinance for ph, copper and lead. Based upon these continuing violations, the staff recommended revocation of Arnold' s permit. The Chairman then ordered the staff report and the official files of the District pertaining to the Class I Permit, various reports, invoices, sample results and all correspondence between the Districts and Arnold Circuits be entered into the official record of the hearing. -17- 4/13/83 Presentation by Arnold Circuits The Chair then recognized Mr. Robert Bertrand, President of Arnold Circuits, who outlined the history of the company and highlighted their attempts to achieve compliance with the Districts' ordinance. He indicated that the major reason for their non-compliance was failure to build necessary treatment facilities to keep pace with the rapid growth of the company. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning Arnold Circuits' inability to meet the Districts' discharge standards. The Directors indicated that they were extremely concerned with Arnold Circuits' inability and/or unwillingness to direct their efforts toward achieving compliance. Close Hearing It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the hearing on revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-135 issued to Arnold Circuits be closed, whereupon the Chairman declared said hearing closed at 9:41 p.m. Revoking Arnold Circuits Industrial It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Waste Permit No. 3-135 subject to Provisions of Stipulation Agreement That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-52-3, re Findings of Facts and ordering the Revocation of Industrial Waste Permit No. 3-135 issued to Arnold Circuits; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Stipulation Pertaining to Industrial Waste Permit No. 3-135, Arnold Circuits, Inc. , suspending said revocation order for a period of 120 days to allow Arnold Circuits time to install necessary treatment facilities �.d to comply with District regulations and setting forth all other terms and conditions of said revocation and suspension thereof; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said Stipulation in form approved by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:42 p.m. Secretary, Board of Directors County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -18- I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/04/83 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER A043 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY •i CLAIMS PAID 03/09/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 062984 A.R.A. MFG. CO. _.. ..._ i222.41 COMPRESSOR PARTS 062985 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS* INC. $129118.50 CONTRACTOR P2-23-6-R1 062986 AIR CALIFORNIA $141.00 TRAVEL , VARIOUS MEETINGS 062987 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS.INC. 5641.10 CYLINDER REFILLS 062986 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $189.21 VALVES 062989 AMERICAN AIR FILTER• INC. $19313.54 PIPE SUPPLIES 062990 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC -PRODUCTS ..__.... .. -S88.i9 LAB SUPPLIES , I 062991 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $19307:26 COMPRESSOR PARTS 062992 AQUA BEN CORP. 1139416.52 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 0629g3 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC. S977.26 ENGINE PARTS 062994 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $635.12 TRUCK PARTS 062995 BANK OF AMERICA $800.81 BOND AND COUPON PROCESSING 062996 BANK OF AMERICA NT 9 SA $15.90 --. TRAVEL EXPENSES 062997 JOHN G. BELL CO. $19898.79 VALVE AND PIPE SUPPLIES 062998 BIERLY 8 ASSOCIATES9 INC. $550.00 WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR 062999 FRED J. BIERMANN s716.47 AUTOCON TRAINING EXPENSES 063000 PATRICIA DAVIS BOGGAN $335.00 DRAFTING P2.-211 063001 BRENTWOOD PRODUCTS $249.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _ 063002 AROOKS INSTRUMENT_9 ---.___ - ------- - _ - 110.004.06 ----- CONTROL EQUIPMENT _ -- 063003 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. $2059417.71 CONTRACTOR 11-13-3 063OD4 CK PUMP AND DEWATERING CORP- $299413.08 CONTRACTOR 5-25 063005 CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. $1.068.20 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES 063006 CS COMPANY 152.51 PIPE SUPPLIES 063007 CALIF. ARMY NATOL. GUARD $99004.26 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063008 JONN CAROLLO ENGINCERS s4v337.46 _-- ENCR: P2-24 -P2-25 063009 JOHN CAROLLO ENG /GREELEY HANSEN 14.336.1E TRAINING P2-23-6 063010 CHAMBER-MIX CONCRETE• INC. $19315.76 BUILDING MATERIALS 063011 CHASTAIN GALLERY $403.00 PICTURE FRAMING 063012 BRIAN CHUCHUAS JEEP• INC. $321.95 TRUCK PARTS 063013 COAST SWEEPING, INC. $580.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 06301A CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $21l6l.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1''I 063015 CONTACTS INFLUENTIAL $963.09 DIRECTORY LEASING 063016 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $229635.58 CHLORINE 063G17 CONTROL SPECIALISTS• INC. $96.57 CONTROL EQUIPMENT I.I 0630111 CORMIER-DELILLO CHEVROLET $202.96 TRUCK PARTS 063019 MR. CRANE $19650.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL I„ 063020 CULLIGAN OEIONIZED WATER SERVICE $21.70 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 063021 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $130.00 ANNEXATION PROCESSING FEE 063022 DAILY PILOT $546.51 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 063023 DAYTON FOUNDRY $300.00 PIPE SUPPLIES I" 063024 OECD S1v130.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063025 DEW-PAR SALES B SERVICE $224.40 WELDING SUPPLIES 063026 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 1610.57 PAINT SUPPLIES 063027 EASTMAN• INC. sR9.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0630211 ENCHANTERS INC. $39500.00 OCEAN MONITORING 063029 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $132.00 TECHNICAL JOURNALS I,r I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/01/83 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/09/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063030 PISCHER B PORTER CO. S298.85 PIPE SUPPLIES 063031 FISHER CONTROLS CO. $72.67 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 063032 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $508.84 LAB SUPPLIES 063333 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS, INC. 5644.75 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063034 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT $986.50 SURVEY P2-25-IA 063035 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY S.509.41 WATER USEAGE 063036 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATBRYs INC. 526.00 LAB ANALYSIS 063037 GMC TRUCK 8 COACH $149707.00 FLAT BED TRUCK 063038 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $909.48 SAND 063039 GENERAL AIR COMPRESSORS. INC. $682.26 COHPRESSOR PARTS 063040 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. %987.29 TELEPHONE II 063041 GIERLICH-MITCHELLr INC. _ _ $172.25 _ PUBLICATIONS J C. 063342 W.N. GRAINGERr INC. $12.04 TRUCK PARTS Ij 063043 H.E. GRAY CO. $39481.54 PIPE SUPPLIES 1I 063044 DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES $19176.00 SURVEY 11-13-3 C63045 TED A. HAMMETT $59586.00 COYOTE CANYON VACUUM TRUCKING + 063046 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $2,909.98 SMALL HARDWARE/PIPE SUPPLIES 0631347 HARTGE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. S79968.75 _ ENGR.- J-IR , PW-099 _ 06304A THE HEAD STOP - -- $223.74 TRUCK PARTS D 063049 HERTZ CORP. $136.64 CAR RENTAL I12063050 HOAGLAND-ARTUKOVICH, J.V. $1499302.00 CONTRACTOR P2-25-IA -063G51 HOLCHEM9 INC. E2rfa0.00 CAUSTIC SODA 063052 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE $65.36 TRUCK TIRES 063053 HONEYWELLr INC. %111.46 LAB SUPPLIES I• i 063064 R.Se HUGHES M - ANC_ $367.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 063055 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 14r287.37 WATER USEAGE is 063056 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $26.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063057 HUNT[NGTON SUPPLY 1279.67 SHALL HARDWARE 063058 INDIAN SPRINGS MFG. CO., INC. $186.94 TOOLS 063059 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT S53.29 BUILDING MATERIALS 063060 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 14AC1{INE S319.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063C61 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT Y3.20 WATER USEAGE ' 063062 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $201.58 BEARING SUPPLIES 063063 KEENAN PIPE 8 SUPPLY CO. $437.78 PIPE SUPPLIES 063064 KING BEARING, INC. S2015.36 BEARING SUPPLIES 063065 KLEEN-LINE CORP $103.67 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 063066 L.B.W.S., INC. SIs654o87 WELDING SUPPLIES l';J 063067 LAKE FOREST ELECTRIC VEHICLES 3236.29 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 063068 LAURSEN COLOR LAB $852.87 FILM PROCESSING II I ' 063069 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. S715. 18 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063070 MACK TRUCKS, INC. $201.76 TRUCK PARTS �. � 063071 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. E120.42 SHALL HARDWARE •� 063072 MED-TOX ASSOCIATES, INC. 3109149.75 CONTRACTOR PW-095 I "l � I 063073 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER E6.00 WATER USEAGE 063074 MOBIL OIL CORP. S172.82 ENGINE OIL I j063075 J. ARTHUR MOOR[, CA, INC- $316.41 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES : I I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/04/83 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/09/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063076 MORGAN EQUIPMENT CO. _ S562.99 TRUCK PARTS r 063077 MYCO INDUSTRIES $148.95 SMALL HARDWARE 063078 NATIONAL PICTURE FRAME INC. $303.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES I,• 063079 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH t.63 WATER USEAGE 063080 NUTRILITE $950.10 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063081 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO- $233.20 BUILDING MATERIALS 063082 ORANGE VALVE 8 FTTTING CO: - -3229:04 PIPE SUPPLIES " 063G83 ORITEX CORP 5452.R0 063084 OXYGEN SERVICE $206.27 TRUCK PARTS SPECIALTY GASES 063085 COUNTY OF ORANGE $119.77 PRE EMPLOYHENT EXAMS 063086 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $59905.66 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND 063087 PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. 1114.37 PAINT SUPPLIES 063088 PTO SALES 329105.00 PIPE SUPPLIES I 063089 PACIFIC TELEPHONE $413.33 TELEMETERING ' I 063090 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS• INC. S551.14 PUMP PARTS_ 063091 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $196.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 063092 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $231.44 SMALL HARDWARE 063093 PORTER BOILER SERVICE• INC. $246.03 PIPE SUPPLIES } = 063094 HAROLD PRIMROSE -ICE "-""-- " - 125.00 INDUSTRIAL IJASTE SAMPLING ICE i > 063095 R. J. W. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC $249235:20 CONTRACTOR rw-085 � ( = 063096 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. S309.25 TRASH DISPOSAL 063097 RE-CY-KLEEN CORP. 5328.74 TRUCK REPAIRS 063098 THE REGISTER $57.00 SUBSCRIPTION 063099 REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. $618.90 STEEL STOCK 063100 ROCKFOAD AEROSPACE PROD - 5336.11 -- USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT I 063101 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $981.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063102 SANTA ANA DODGE $34.76 TRUCK PARTS :I 063103 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $2,119.37 ELECTRIC MOTOR 063104 SEAL METHODS, INC. S339.94 SMALL HARDWARE 063115 SEARS, ROEBUCK B CO. $181.79 TOOLS 063106 SHALLER 3 LOHR, INC. $6,643.56 CSDOC N5&6 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 063107 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S29020.34 TOOLS • I 063108 SMITH-EMERY CO. S19264.00 TESTING I1-13-3 063109 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT $139398.00 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 06311C SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $148,155.29 POWER 063111 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $16.23 WATER USEAGE 063112 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $129570.16 DIESEL FUEL I ; 063113 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER i56.03 TRUCK REPAIRS 063114 STAROW STEEL $19518.11 STEEL STOCK 063115 THE SUPPLIERS $974.50 SMALL HARDWARE 063116 J. WAYNE SiLVESTER i1,059.44 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 063117 TEC if/AID - S672.OD TEMPORARY HELP 063118 TERRYOS UPHOLSTERY $25.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 1 � 063119 THOMAS BROS. MAPS $99683.63 DIRECTORY-DISTRICTS TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM 063120 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $747.07 PAINT SUPPLIES I • 663121 THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES $880.00 TEMPORARY HELP I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/04/83 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 � I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/09/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION i ' 663122 TRAFFIC CONTROL SEAVICE, INC. $626.46 SAFETY SUPPLIES 063123 TROJAN BATTERIES $360.65 TRUCK BATTERIES 063124 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY• INC. $19861.00 TRUCK PARTS I, 063125 TUBESALES $230.95 PIPE SUPPLIES 063126 U.S. CONTAINER 397.12 SMALL HARDWARE 063127 UNION SIGN CO. _ _ $450.24 SAFETY SIGNS 063128 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE _ESA.76 DELIVERY SERVICE 063129 UNIVERSITY SALES 8 SERVICE $74.65 TRUCK PARTS 063130 VWR SCIENTIFIC 1537.86 LAB SUPPLIES 063131 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $209.28 PIPE SUPPLIES 063132 VALVE 8 STEEL SUPPLY CO. 15017.23 VALVES 063133 VAREC, INC. $3_ ,402.61 LAB SUPPLIES 063134 VISICORP. CUSTOMER SERVICE 321.20 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 063135 THE WALDINGER CORP. 189551.48 CONTRACTOR J-11-2-1 063136 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATESv INC. $702.27 CONSTRUCTION GRANT CLAIMS STUDY 063137 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $145.16 ENGINE PARTS 06313P WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP $19119.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063139 B. D. WHETSTONE 8 ASSOCIATES $175.00 _ CSDOCN6 TAX BILL PROGRAMS -_063140 WHITE• FINE & VEAVILLE_ $19646.44 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY D 0 6 3 1 A 1 WITEG SCIENTIFIC 147.70 LAB SUPPLIES -'!:063142 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF S244.00 LEGAL SERVICES 063143 XEROX CORP. s313.89 XEROX REPRODUCTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 63/D9/83 ----'%822s578_76-.- "I SUMMARY AMOUNT ` #1 OPER FUND $ 117.86 i #2 OPER FUND 1 ,684-32 a2 ACO FUND 520.40 .. N3 OPER FUND 545.94 N5 OPER FUND 914 . 39 N6 OPER FUND 226.78 d7 OPER FUND 2, 155.91 #1 1 OPER FUND 1 ,480.37 N11 ACO FUND 208,798. 711 N5c6 OPER FUND 1 ,693.86 H5G6 ACO FUND 36, 106. 58 i H6c7 OPER FUND 3,004.83 JT OPER FUND 232,857.49 CORE 269.523.91 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 6,455.66 JT. WORKING CAPITAL FUND 56.491 .72 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/09/83 $822,578.76 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/133 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/23/83 ' 1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESC3IDTION I , j 063161 AIR CALIFORNIA $248.00 AIR FARE; VARIOUS MEETINGS - 063162 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALS,INC. 114.28 SPECIALTY GASES ' 063163 AMERICAN DIUITAL SYSTEMS,INC• $31000.00 FLOW MONITORING STUDY 063164 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 1;49.00 ALARM SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 063169 AMERICAN HI-LIFT $9 n 7.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 063166 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $253.79 LAB SUPPLIES 063167 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY---- --- - - -- $60.00 TECHNICAL JOURNALS 063168 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 119971.55 PUMP PARTS 063169 AQUA BEN CORP. 189973.31 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 063170 ASTRO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO. $24.37 TOOLS 063171 BAKER PLYWOOD CO., INC. $725.79 LUMBER 063172 BANK OF AMERICA NT 8 SA $965.96 TRAVEL EXPENSES 063173 BELL INDUSTRIES - $48.77 PIPE SUPPLIES i 063171 JAMES BENZIE $90.80 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ! � 063175 BIERLY 8 ASSOCIATES• INC. $550.00 WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR 063176 BIG BOX RENTAL CO. $19320.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 063177 BLACK 8 DECKER MFG. CO. $52.99 TOOLS 063178 BLUE SEAL LINEN SUPPLY $75.00 TOWEL RENTAL 063179 BOB'S AIR CONDITIONING------- --- ------------ --- - -. - - $140.98 - - -TRUCK REPAIRS 063180 PATRICIA DAVIS BOGGAN $425.00 DRAFTING P2-23-6 i "0063181 BRENNER-FIELDER B ASSOC.* INC. 1783.13 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063IS2 BUENA PARK LUMBER 8 HARDWARE $1,499.71 SMALL HARDWARE 063183 BURKE CONCRETE ACCESSORIES $40.99 BUILDING MATERIALS i 063184 BUTLER ENGINEERING, INC. $191095.20 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-25-IA 063185 C.F. AIRFREIGHT, INC. -- - $96.03 FREIGHT i 063186 CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. $131.44 WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE 063187 CAL STATE SEAL COMPANY 1171.11 PIPE SUPPLIES 063188 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49282.80 CONSTR. P2-211-2, OEM P2-211, ENERGY TASK FORCE 063169 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49295.29 ENGR. 5 YEAR MASTER PLAN UPDATE 063190 CARUS CHEMICAL CO., INC. $926.00 FEEDER RENTAL 063191 CETEC ELECTRONICS $195.61 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063192 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. $]0,532.36 GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL 063193 CIVIC CENTER LOCK B SAFE $170.54 SMALL HARDWARE 063194 CLARK DYE HARDWARE S178.88 SMALL HARDWARE I.1, ' I 063195 COAST SWEEPING. INC. S380.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 063196 COMPRESSOR 8 INDUSTRIAL $19818.14 ENGINE PARTS 063197 CONNELL CHEVROLET $30.95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063198 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $39061.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063199 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS $29131.35 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 063200 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S22,715.14 G I I L 0 R I N E 063201 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $51843.49 ENGINE PARTS 063202 CORMIER-DELILLO CHEVROLET $36.74 TRUCK PARTS 063203 CRICKETT HOTEL $342.04 AUTOCON TRAINING LODGING 063204 CULLIGAN DE IONIZED WATER SERVICE $163.30 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 063205 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1130.00 ANNEXATION PROCESSING FEE 0632G6 OME, INC. $345.90 TRUCK PARTS i t i i I. FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/19/83 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/?3/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUVT DESCRIPTION 063207 DAILY PILOT - - - -- - - _.-_.._ - S327.60 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING - 063206 C.R. DAVIS SUPPLY CO. $923.91 PIPE SUPPLIES 063209 DAYTON FOUNDRY $500.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063210 DEBIN ENTERPRISES• INC. S?91.64 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I' 063211 OECD $169365.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063212 DELCO SALES 1.1162.40 VALVES ! I 063213 DELPHI SYSTEMS9 INC.- - --- - - -- -- - - - - 532.50 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES -- ' j 063214 DESOT09 INC. $19111.77 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063215 DRI-SLIDE• INC. $375.87 ENGINE OIL 063216 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S19164.92 PAINT SUPPLIES 063217 EASTMAN9 INC. $315.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063218 EDINGER MEDICAL GROUP• INC. $77.00 MEDICAL EXAMS � ! 063219 FiBERGRATE CORP. $59926.27 PLASTIC GRATING 063220 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $39542.97 PIPE SUPPLIES 063221 FISHER CONTROLS CO. %871.20 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 063222 FISHER CONTROLS 1133.98 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 063223 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.371.41 LAB SUPPLIES 063224 FLO-SYSTEMS $391.47 PIPE SUPPLIES 063225 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT-- -- - - $487.38 SURVEY P2-25- IA 063226 THE FOXBORO COMPANY $19298.92 PIPE SUPPLIES C0063227 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $974.54 COMPRESSOR PARTS 063228 FROST ENGINEERING CERVICES CO. $203.83 - PIPE SUPPLIES ! 063229 CITY OF FULLERTON 137.41 WATER USEAGE ; i 063230 GENERAL AIR COMPRESSORS. INC. $397.05 TRUCK PARTS -- TELEPHONE--063231 GENERAL TCLEPHONE- CO.---.-. --------- --- - --- -- - -E79394.46 _. -- -- - � •i 063232 N.E. GRAY CO. $750.22 PIPE SUPPLIES ! I 063233 DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES S19853.00 SURVEY 11-13-3 063234 LARRY HALLOS $95.40 TRUCK REPAIRS 063235 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. $32.73 SMALL HARDWARE 063236 HALSTED & HOGGAN• INC. $53.97 SMALL HARDWARE 063237 HERTZ CAR LEASING $19605.21 VEHICLE LEASING 063238 HOLLY SUGAR 518*456.94 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063239 HONEYWELL• INC. $534.17 PIPE SUPPLIES 063240 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $39.56 BATTERIES 063241 R.S. HUGHES CO.* INC. $721.83 SMALL HARDWARE i 063212 HUNDLEY COMPANY9 INC. 119329.58 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES j 063243 ISCO COMPANY S9.744.88 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063244 INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE $1982A.97 PIPE INSTALLATION 063245 ©RYON JACKSON PUMP DIVISION S46.64 FREIGHT 063246 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY Sh'i.63 BEARING SUPPLIES 063247 KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS 849Q.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 063248 KING BEARINGS INC. $579.72 BEARING SUPPLIES 063249 KIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS $946.43 PUMP PARTS ,I 063250 KLEEN-LINE CORP 1-122.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I � 063251 L 8 N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO 539365.66 UNIFORM RENTAL 063252 L.B.W.S.• INC. $1?3.36 WELDING SUPPLIES No I, FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING. DATE 3/)R/83 PAGE 3 - REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/23/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063253 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. - $698.63 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063254 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. $19686.36 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063255 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1.360.00 ANNEXATION PROCESSING FEE 063256 LOS ANGELES TIMES $158#48 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 063257 LOWRY 8 ASSOCIATES $211967.44 CSDOC N13 FORMATION I 06325E MACK TRUCKS, INC- $461.64 TRUCK PARTS 063259 MATT - CHLOR, INC. - - - - - $2058.95 - PIPE SUPPLIES 063260 MCCOY FORD TRACTOR $256.60 TRUCK PARTS L 063261 MCKESSON CHEMICAL CO. $25,299.11 ' ODOR CONTROL CHEMICALS 063262 MC LAUGHLIN IND. DISTR., INC- $798.77 TOOLS 063263 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $659.61 SMALL HARDWARE 063264 MECHANICAL DRIVE SYSTEMS $90.56 TOOLS j 063265 METROPOLITAN CIRCUITS - $2,051.75 -- USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063266 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $804.00 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 063267 PAUL A. MITCHELL $17.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE I 063268 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $2,628.83 PIPE SUPPLIES 063269 E.B. MORITZ FOUNDRY $39381.36 MANHOLE RING s COVER i 063270 FRANCES MORRISON $10.20 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE i 063271 MYCO INDUSTRIES -----__..-_. ------ 4212.86 - - -- SMALL-HARDWARE _ 063272 NATIONAL CHEMSEARCH $93.28 PAINT SUPPLIES ao063273 NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY $378.88 SMALL HARDWARE 063274 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $58.77 WATER USEAGE 063275 O-T.S. DISTRIBUTORS $110.30 TRUCK PARTS 063276 OAKITE PRODUCTS, INC. $1179.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 063277 OCEAN SALT CO., INC.- - - - - $257.58 - - SALT SUPPLY 063278 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $920.65 TRUCK PARTS 063279 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $21.20 BUILDING MATERIALS 063280 ORITEX CORP $640.45 BEARING SUPPLIES 063281 OXYGEN SERVICE 1139.47 SPECIALTY GASES 063282 COUNTY OF ORANGE $39383.28 TESTING 11-13-3, COMMUNICATION EQUIP. MTCE. 063283 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTPOLR S26032.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES I 063284 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $39018.31; REPLENISH WORKERS COMP. FUND 063285 PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. $1,J02.97 PAINT SUPPLIES I•' j 063286 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 1544.38 SAFETY SUPPLIES . i 063287 PACIFIC TELEPHONE $511.04 TELEMETERING it 063288 PARTS UNLIMITED $1,327.54 TRUCK PARTS 063289 M-C- PATTEN CORP. $59.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063290 PENNWALT CORP. $19370.41 SMALL HARDWARE 063291 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $25.03 SMALL HARDWARE 063292 POSTMASTER 1700.00 POSTAGE 063293 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $19')38.80 BUILDING MATERIALS 063294 ROYAL TRUCK BODY S154.55 TRUCK PARTS I 063295 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS $1110.67 TRUCK PARTS jj 063296 RED VALVE CO., INC. $I,H42.26 VALVES C63297 CHARLES C. REGAN CO. $1,000.00 ASPHALT 063298 THE REGISTER $39460.20 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING I I 1I i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/R3 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/23/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCR13TION 063299 REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. --- i19470.28 STEEL STOCK - ' 063300 THEODORE ROBINS FORD 5124.26 TRUCK PARTS 063301 JOSEPH T. RYERSON 8 SON, INC. $129186.68 STEEL STOCK 063302 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $547.50 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 063303 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. S58.50 LAB SUPPLIES 063304 CITY'OF SEAL BEAC11 S9.80 WATER USEAGE 063305 SEARS9 ROEBUCK 8 CO. --___. _ ___ _ S3110.63 TOOLS " 063306 SHALLER S LOHR9 INC. $29839.00 ENGR. 5-18R, CSDOC N5c6 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 063307 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $3*647.04 TOOLS 0633G8 A.H. SHIPKEY9 INC. l91238.36 TRUCK TIRES 063309 SIMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S7?3.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES ` 063310 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 1.1259487.12 POWER 063311 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $479811.84 - NATURAL GAS - ' 063312 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $591.48 BOTTLED WATER 063313 STRYOER INDUSTRY $572.40 SMALL HARDWARE 063314 SUPER CHEM CORP $19993.12 SOLVENTS -. 063315 THE SUPPLIERS S29534.31 TOOLS 063316 SYBRON - CASTLE 5429.44 LAB MAINTENANCE --- ---. PLANT MAINTENANCE_06331 7 TAK TAKAHINE _ ____ _. ____ _ . __. . __. $372.00 - 00063318 TECH/AID $672.00 TEMPORARY HELP __O63319 F.H. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING S108.00 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE -063320 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $970..45 PAINT SUPPLIES I" 063321 THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES $380.00 TEMPORARY HELP 663322 TRAVEL BUFFS 1319.00 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS 063323 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY* INC. - $29114.15 TRUCK PARTS 063324 J.G. TUCKER 8 SON9 INC. $99380.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063325 U.S. AUTO GLASS9 INC. $63.60 TRUCK REPAIRS 063326 UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. S92.98 GASOLINE 063327 UNITED CONCRETE PIPE DIV $2#470.86 CONCRETE PIPE 06332P UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $39.57 DELIVERY SERVICE ! 063329 VWR SCIENTIFIC ---- S2 007.50 LAB SUPPLIES - 063330 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $428.06 PIPE SUPPLIES 063331 JOHN R. WAPLES $392.40 ODOR CONSULTANT 063332 WARREN B BAILEY t397.04 PIPE SUPPLIES 063333 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER 1413.40 ENGINE PARTS !• 063334 WESTERN WIRE 8 ALLOYS 5206.57 WELDING SUPPLIES 063335 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF $89878.97 LEGAL SERVICES 063336 XEROX CORP. S3.968.52 XEROX REPRODUCTION 063337 Y - TIRE $142.38 TRUCK TIRES ----------------- i TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/23/83 $542.516.72 ----------------- FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/83 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/23/83 SUMMARY AMOUNT N1 OPER FUND $ 22.79 N2 OPER FUND 3,666.45 N2 ACO FUND 1 ,500.00 N3 OPER FUND 13,973.35 N5 OPER FUND -- ---- 6,285.9$ N5 ACO FUND 360.00 N6 OPER FUND 104.92 N7 OPER FUND 4, 166. 30 N7 ACO FUND 1 ,500.00 #11 OPER FUND 5,0115.09 #11 ACO FUND 3,099.58 #13 ACO FUND 21 ,967.44 #5&6 OPER FUND 1 , 350.24 H5s6 ACO FUND 2,1179.00 N6&7 OPER FUND 16. Ili JT OPER FUND 289,969.92 0o CORF 84 ,45S.60 V2 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 244.00 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 3,568. 31 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 98,744.61 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/23/83 - ... --...._..._... . $542 ,516.72 .I ..I ' `I BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area 714 JOINT BOARDS 962-24111 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MAY 11, 1983 - 7 :30 P . M . DISTRICTS 2 & 3 (4) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Linda LeQuire of the city of Fullerton from the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 3, and to receive and file minute excerpt from the city of Fullerton re appointment of first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: District(s) Active Director Alternate Director 2 & 3 Duane Winters Buck Catlin ALL DISTRICTS (16) (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for purchase of Pipe and Fittings for Replacement of a Plant Water Line at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-4, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00. See page "I" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, in the matter of a Cross-Complaint of Westates Carbon Company, Inc. , et al. v. Orange County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 396995 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file communications from the following member agencies declaring support of recently-adopted District policy urging each member agency to have a single Director represent all Districts of which the agency is a member: Agency Date of Letter City of Fullerton May 10, 1983 Midway City Sanitary District May 9, 1983 City of Yorba Linda May 5, 1983 DISTRICT 1 (17) (a) Consideration of V.A.L. Circuits' application for Industrial Waste Discharge Permit: (1) Staff Report. See page "II" (2) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of Class I Industrial Waste Discharge Permit to V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. for the period May 12 through June 30, 1983 -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA May 5, 1983 P.O.BOX8127 Y 10844ELLISAVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: Fred A. Harper, General Manager SUBJECT: Authorization to Purchase Pipe and Fittings for Replacement of a Plant Water Line, Plant No. 1 The 8-inch welded steel plant water line which serves the new solids dewatering building (Job No. P1-19) has deteriorated and is badly corroded. It is not capable of supplying an adequate supply of wash water for the belt filter presses cpertLtion. It is proposed that the existing line be replaced with a new 12 inch Ductile Iron pipe froan the plant water pump station to a point where it joins the belt press building. This is an eIergency maintenance project. In order to expedite this replacement, it is requested that the General Manager be authorized to purchase the required pipe and fittings and solicit �..� informal bids from contractors for the installation. Authority to do so should be requested at the May 11, 1983 Board of Directors meeting because of the urgency of this project. The estimated cost for the purchase of materials and installation is $35,000.00. Ray Lewis Chi eer Approv A. Harper General Manager REL:DE/jm "I" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "I" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELUS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 May 11, 1983 STAFF REPORT V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. Application for Industrial Waste Discharge Permit Staff Recommendation It is the recommendation of Districts' staff that the Board of Directors of District No. 1 issue to V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. a Class I Industrial Waste Discharge Permit valid through June 30 - 1983. This recommendation is based on the fact that V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. has emonstrated to the satisfaction of staff that they are now capable of achieving compliance with all terms and conditions of the Districts' Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities. Background V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. has now complied with all the following requirements as specified in the Agreement RE: Application of V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. for Industrial Waste Permit: Requirement Section Description i V.A.L. has acknowledged and accepts basis for revocation; 2 Consultant has certified pretreatment will control discharge; 3 V.A.L. has contracted with consultant to provide ade- quate operation and maintenance of pretreatment system; 4 V.A.L. agrees to 45 day temporary permit and conditions of same; 5 V.A.L. agrees to 45 day temporary permit and conditions of temporary permit; "II-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) (1) - DISTRICT 1 Requirement Section Description 6 Permanent pretreatment facilities have been installed; 7 Wastehauling of spent solutions has been accomplished; 8 V.A.L. has agreed to Districts' authority to disconnect connection if violations of temporary permit limitations occur; 9 V.A.L. has agreed to pay costs of Districts' sampling, inspections, etc. 10 $5,000.00 bond has been posted by V.A.L. ; 11 Outstanding invoices have been paid ($5,040.28) ; 12 V.A.L. has agreed that their failure to comply with terms of this agreement can result in District disconnecting V.A.L. Circuits; 13 Installation of individual water meters and connections for each V.A.L. operation has been completed; 14 Disconnection of cross connected water lines has been completed; 15 Districts have received copies of City approval of water and sewer connections; 16 a) Installation of District approved sample box has been completed; b) Weekly Progress Reports have been submitted; 17 V.A.L. has agreed to honor special conditions in sub- sequent permit; 18 Districts and V.A.L. have agreed that prevailing party in court proceedings entitled to recover costs; 19 V.A.L. has read and agrees to all terms of this agreement; "II-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) (1) - DISTRICT 1 AGENDA ITEM N0, 14(D) (1) May 11 , 1983 WRITTEN COMMENTS ON PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE District No. 2 Respondent: Kaynar-Microdot Fastening Systems City: Fullerton Respondent ' s Comments : Limit of 0 . 02 mg/1 for total identifiable chlorinated hydrocarbons should only apply to PCB ' s and pesticides--not to other substances such as various solvents . Staff ' s Response : Concur with respondent ' s comments ; recommend Table I of Section 208 be modified as follows : Total id-,�e..�i�„le-Ghtee-inated Hyd-reearbens ( TTGH) 0 . 02 mg,'! PCB ' s and Pesticides 0 . 02 mg/1 Total Toxic Organics (EPA recommendation) 0 . 58 mg/1 District No. 2 Respondent : Kimberly-Clark City: Fullerton Respondent ' s Comments : (A) Limit of 0 . 02 mg/1 for TICH should apply to PCB ' s and pesticides rather than all chlorinated hydrocarbons . (B) Request that non-compliance fee not be charged until non-compliance is confirmed by an S&E Program. (C) Fines in excess of etablished non- compliance fees should only be con- sidered if the non-compliance fees do not cover actual damages to the treatment facilites . (D) No justification for the 25% administrative override charge. Any fines assessed should be limited to actual costs incurred . Staff ' s Response: (A) Concur with comments . Recommend that Table I of Section 208 be modified as set forth in response to Raynar. (B) , (C) & (D) Purpose of Ordinance is to control non-compatible pollutants and for industries to be in compliance. Non- compliance fees and administrative costs are established to insure purpose and intent of Ordinance. Staff recommends that fees remain as proposed. District No. 2 Respondent: Oscar Mayer City: Fullerton Respondent ' s Comments : Request that lower end of pH limit be reduced from 6.0 to 5 .0 . Staff ' s Response: A pH of 7. 0 is neutral. A pH of 5 .0 is 100 times more acidic than 7 .0 and would be corrosive to the sewer system. A pH of 6 .0 has been in effect since 1969 and most industries are in consistent compliance. Staff recommends no change. District No. 3 Respondent: Hunt-Wesson Foods City: Fullerton Respondent ' s Comments : The non-compliance fee for violation of pH based on a gallonage discharge may be of concern with those companies that have a large volume discharge, but a slight out-of-compliance condition . A flat fee for each day of violation is preferred. Staff ' s Comments : Concur with respondent ' s comments . The Districts have made the change to a flat rate non-compliance fee in the most recent draft. -2- v _p MAY 11 , 1983 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN ON APRIL 21, I , AS THE JOINT CHAIRMAN, APPEARED BEFORE THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD IN SACRAMENTO AT A HEARING ON THE DRAFT EIR AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA OCEAN PLAN. THE RESOLUTION N0. 83-33 WHICH WAS ADOPTED BY OUR BOARDS ON APRIL 13TH IN SUP- PORT OF THE 14 POSITION PAPERS PREPARED BY THE TECHNICAL AD HOC COMMITTEE pp OF COASTAL ENTITIES KNOWN AS THE CALIFORNIA OCEAN DISCHARGES WAS PRESENTED. I FOCUSED MY COMMENTS ON PROPOSED FOOTNOTE NO. 16 WHICH UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS, WOULD PERMIT THE DISCHARGE OF THE MUNICIPAL SLUDGES TO THE OCEAN ON AN INTERIM BASIS. I STATED THAT THE STATE BOARD STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS WERE LOGICAL, CAUTIOUS AND CONSERVATIVE WHICH WE BELIEVE TO BE PROPER. I ALSO INDICATED THAT FOOTNOTE N0. 16 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT POLICY OF EPA BASED ON THE STATEMENT OF THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR WATER, U.S. EPA, BEFORE TWO SUBCOMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE, MERCHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES COMMITTEE IN THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, MARCH ,ISTH OF THIS YEAR. WE INCLUDED IN OUR TESTIMONY FOR THE RECORD THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATORS FOR- MAL STATEMENT. ti a WE ALSO INCLUDED IN OUR TESTIMONY A COPY OF AMSA' S RECOM- MENDATIONS ON MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL SEWAGE SLUDGE TO THE EPA SLUDGE TASK FORCE. THESE RECOMMENDATIONS COVERED LAND BASED ALTERNATIVES SUCH AS COMPOSTING, RECYCLING, LANDFILL BURIAL, AS WELL AS INCINERATION, AND OCEAN DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT. WE INDI- CATED THAT THE AMSA OCEAN MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ARE CON- SISTENT WITH STATE BOARD STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR FOOTNOTE No. 16. TWO OF THE STATE BOARD MEMBERS COMPLIMENTED US ON OUR PRE- SENTATION AS TO THE TENOR OF OUR REMARKS AS WELL AS THE COMPLETE- NESS OF THE BACK-UP MATERIAL. THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, RELA- TIVE TO THE OCEAN PLAN AMMENDMENTS, WILL SOON BE OVER AND WE EXPECT A DECISION ON THE SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE OCEAN PLAN TO BE ACTED UPON WITHIN THE NEXT 45 DAYS. -------------- CASA HELD A MEETING .IN SACRAMENTO THIS PAST WEEKEND AND DIRECTOR EDGAR AND OUR GENERAL COUNSEL ATTENDED. (PERHAPS ASK FOR THERR COMMENTS) . ---------------- THERE WILL BE A MEETING OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE AT 4:30 P.M. , MAY 19TH, THEY WILL BE CONSIDERING THE JO AND CORF BUDGETS FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WHICH WILL MEET ON JUNE 1ST. `�' --------------- CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5: 3OP. M . , WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1ST . INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: ROBERT MANDI C PHILIP MAURER GERALD MULLEN ------------ COMMENT THAT THERE WIL BE AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE JOINT BOARDS JUNE 1ST AT 7 M TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE FOR WHICH WE ARE CONDUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT. --------------- THERE WILL BE A ,JOINT MEETING OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO STUDY REORGANIZATION OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS AND THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE, JUNE 8TH AT 5: OOP. M. PRECEEDING THE REGULAR .JUNE .JOINT BOARD MEETING. May "1 1983 7:30 m. 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 MEETING DATE TIME p• DISTRICTS ' DISTRICT_1 JOINT BOARDS CRANK) HANSON... .,. ✓ (N I ELSEN).. .. ).ADLER. . . .. .. . BRICK5N . ,, , , ,LUXEMBOURGER � MAC ALLISTER .BAILEY.. .. EDGAR).. . .. .: :SLT ' . � NH[ELS KS N... .. . .BROWN. . . .. . . RILEY CrTAifT'9N. , ,, jG o . ,000PER. ,��✓✓�PERRY ,. .. . . .CULVER... . . . ✓ DISTRICT 2 (SALTARE LI). , ,EDGAR. . , . . , . ✓ EDWARDSS). . . . . .FINLAYSON. . . � (MURPHY). .. . . ,WEDAA. . , , , ,. ✓ �SEIDELI . , , , . .FRESE, . , , , . . 1/ (OVERHOLTS,... .ROTH. . . .. ...� JARRE L). . .. . .GRIFFIN. .. . . ✓ NIELSEN)... .. .BROWN. .. . . ..JC 4CRANK). . . . .. . .HANSON. . . . . . HICKS)) ., , , ,, ,COOPER.. . . . .. (COX)) . . . . . . . . .HART. . . . . . . . ✓ KUZNI��CC . .. . .. .HOLT. . . . . . . .JG HARTS. , . . . . . .HEATHER. . . . . ODLUM), ,. , , . ,KAWANAMI. . . .�� KUZNI�{C�). .. . . ..HOLT. . , . , , , ,,G BRICKENN),. . .. .LUXEMBOURGER 0..i CRANK t., ,, ., ,.HUTCHISON. , . ✓ WIEDER). .. ... ,tfE6�A0�DE,. ..� ODLUMII. ... . . .KAWANAMI. . . .Z� (CULVER).,. .. . .PERRY, .. ., . , ✓ VANDERSTAAYS.,LASZLO. . . . ..� BEYER). . . .. . .SMITH. , . .. .. (BRICKEN).. . . ..LUXEMBOURGER� HOLMBERG). ., . ,*EE*L. . . . . .. ✓ (FINL Y). .. . . ..MANDIC. . , . .,� CATLIN). . . .. . .WINTERS. . . .._� SAGEE), . .. . . ..MAURER. . . . ,. ✓ ILACAYO).. . , . ..MULLEN. . .. . . COOPER), . . . , , .NELSON. . . . . . ✓ DISTRICT 3 WIEDER). . .. . $. . . . EDWARDS).., . . .FINLAYSON. . . ✓ CULVARI•I. . . . . .PERRY. . . . ... � VANDERSTAAY). .LASZLO., . . . . 0 HART. , , 1 � � „PERRY PL UMM ER. . . . .sG NIELS N). . .. . .ADLER, , , . . , , ✓ MARSHOTTS, . . . .RELL. . . . . a . .�_ PERRY , .. ,.. ,CULVER,. . . , ,= STANTW� ' ,. , , . ,RILEY. . . . . . . ✓ SEIDEL) .. .. . .FRESE. . .. . . . ii�G�ii@�glO�bt'5me". , .. . . ,� JARRELL ... . ..GRIFFIN.. . . , OVERH LT). . . . ,ROTH, . , , , . . , ✓ BRICKE LUXEMBOURGER EDGAR ". FINLEY , ,, , , , ,MANDIC, , . . . , OBEYER . . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . LACAYO . .. .. , .MULLEN,. . . , , ✓ RILEY ... . . .S A*+9N. . . . . COOPER . . , . .NELSON.. . , . ,�G ZOMMICK)., , . , .SYLVIA. . . . . . T). . . MARSHQT . .RELL. . .. , , , .�� 4AGRAN). . . . . . ..VARDOULIS. . ,�G OVERHOLj . .. . .RO F. . , ., , .WEDEL G )GREEN) , ., . . ,.WAHNER. .. . . .� , )1 `MURPHY). , , , . .,WEDAA.. .. . , , \.or✓ ZOMMICK . ... .SYLVIA,, ,, . ._� ROGET). , , ,. ..WEDEL. . .. . . . ✓ NESTANppE), .. . ,WIEDER.. .. . ._•� (NESTANDE). . . ..WIEDER. .. . . ._L/ ICATLIN). .. .. ..WINTERS. .. .. (CATLIN). .. . . ..WINTERS.. . . . _� DISTRICT 5 COX) . , .. . .. , .HART. , . . , . . . ✓ AGEES. . . . . ..'MAURER. . . . . .�G STANTONS,. , .. .RILEY. . . . . . ._�„C STAFF: HARPER. , . . . . DISTRICT 6 SYLVESTER. . , LEWIS. . . . . . . 4CRAN� ).. ,, .. . .HUTCHISON. . . ✓' CLARKE.-, . , . , ((HART) .. .. . . . .PLUMMER.. . . . DAWES. . . , , . , ANDERSON*, , . BUTLER. . . . . , DISTRICT 7 BROWN, , , . . , . BAKER, , ., . . . (SALTARELLI). . .EDGAR. . . . . . . ✓ ATKINSON.. , . 4BEYEF).. •• • • • .SMITH. . . . .. ... YOUNG.. , . , .. l(HART)). , ., .. . .HEATHER.. , . . ✓ BRICKEN�I).. . . . ,LUXEMBOURGER� OTHERS: WIEDER), ,, . , . ... .JC WOODRUFF. , ,. AGRANJ.. ,, . .. .VARDOULIS,. .JC HOHENER, , , ,. GREEN ., .., . , mWAHNER., . , . ,_&G• HOWARD, .. . ,. HUNT... , , . .. DISTRICT 11 KEITH.. .. , ., KNOPF.. , . , ,, MAC ALLISTER).BAILEY.. Sao . ✓ LE BLANC,, , , NESTANDE)., . ,,WIEDER. . . . . . ✓ LINDSTROM* , . (MAC ALLISTER).PATTINSON, r✓ LYNCH, . . . . . . MARTINSON, . . PEARCE.. . . , . 3/1/83 14EETING DATE May 11, 1983 TIME 7:30 P.m.DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (CRANK) HANSON. . . . . . (NIELSEN). . . . . .ADLER. . . . . . . (BRICK N . . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (MAC ALL)STER).BAILEY. . . . . . (EDGAV. . . . . . . .SALTARELLI. . (NIELSEN . . . . . .BROWN. . . . . . . (RILEY). . . . . . . .STANTON. . . . . (HICKS). . . . . . . .COOPER. . . . . . (PERRY).. . . . . . .CULVER. . . . . . DISTRICT 2 (SALTARELLI ). . .EDGAR. . . . . . . (EDWARDS). . . . . .FINLAYSON. . . (MURPHY). . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . . (SEIDEL).. . . . . .FRESE. . . . . . . (OVERHOLT3. . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . (JARREIL). . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . . . (NIELS N). . . . . .BROWN. . . . . . . (CRANK . . . . . . . .HANSON. . . . . . SSHICKS) . . . . . . .COOPER. . . . . . (COX) . . . . . . . . .HART. . . . . . . . IKUZNIK3. . . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . . (HART S. . . . . . . . .HEATHER. . . . . SS(ODLUM)NNt. . . . . .KAWANAMI . . . . ((KUZNIK). . . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . . IWREDER). . . . . . .NESTANDERGER �CRANKIODLUM). . . . . . . .KAWANAMON� 99 (CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY. . . . . . . (VANDERSTAAYS. .LASZLO. . . . . . (BEYER). . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . (BRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (HOLMBERGS. . . . .WEDEL. . . . . . . (FINLEY). . . . . . .MANDIC. . . . . . (CATLIN). . . . . . .WINTERS. . . . . AGEE). . . . . . . . .MAURER. . . . . . LACAYO). . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . . . (COOPER). . . . . . .NELSON. . . . . . DISTRICT 3 44 (WIEDER). T NESTANDE. . . . (MAC AL�ISER . PATTINSON. . . (EDWARDS). . . . . .FINLAYSON. . . (CULV R . . . . . . . PERRY. . . . . . . 4VANDERSTAAY). .LASZLO. . . . . . (HART) PLUMMER. . . . . NIELS€N). . . . . .ADLER. . . . . . . (MARSHOTT . . . . .RELL. . . . . . . . (PERRY)t CULVER. . . . .. (STANTON). . . . . .RILEY. . . . . . . (SEIDELS . .FRESE. . . . . . . (WEDEL) tt ROGET. . . . . . . JARRELLS. . . . . . GRIFFIN. . . . . (OVERHOT . . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . IBRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (EDGAR). . . . . . . .SALTARELLI . . (FINLEY). . . . . . .MANDIC. . . . . . (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . (LACAYO). . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . . . (RILEY). . . . . . .STANTON. . . . . (COOPER). . . . . .NELSON.. . . . . (ZOMMICKS.. . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . MARSH?TT�. . . . :RELL. . . . . . . . (AGRAN). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. . . WEDEL). . (c. . . . .ROGET. . . . . . . (GREEN) . .. . . . .WARNER. . . . . . OVERHOLTI. . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . (MURPHYS. . . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . v . ZOMMICK). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . (ROGET). . . . . . . .WEDEL. . . . . . . (NESTANppE). . . . .WIEDER.. . . . . (NESTANDE). . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . (CATLIN). . . . . . .WINTERS. . . . . (CATLIN). . . . . . .WINTERS. . . . . DISTRICT 5 (COX) . . . . . . . . . HART. . . . . . . . (AGEES. . . . . . . . .MAURER. . . . . . (STANTON). . . . . .RILEY. . . . . . . AFF: HARPER. . . . . . ✓ DISTRICT 6 SYLVESTER. . .LEWIS �L (CRANK) CLARK . . . . . . . . . . .HUTCHISON. . . �G LARKE. . . . . .� (HART) . . . . . . . .PLUMMER. . . . . DAWES. . . . . . a ✓ (RILEYS. . . . . . . .STANTON. . . . . ANDERSON. . . .� BUTLER. . . . . . �G DISTRICT 7 BROWN. . . . . . . BAKER. . . . . . . (SALTARELL I ). . . EDGAR. . . . . . . ATiti its 9N'. . . . (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . YOUNG. . . . . . (HART). . . . . . . .HEATHER. . . . . (BRICKENNS. . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER ii) (WIEDER). . . . . . .NESTANDE. . . . WOODRUFF. . . .�� (AGRAN . . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. . . HOHENER. . . . . (GREEN . . . . . . . .WARNER. . . . . . L JaAA--HOWARD. . . . . . DISTRICT 11 ,,,�j-HUNT. . . . . . . ._ KEITH. . . . . . . --KNOPF. . . . . . . �— (MAC ALLISTER).BAILEY. . . . . . LE BLANC. , , . (NESTANDE). . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . LINDSTROM. . . (MAC ALL ISTER).PATTINSON.- LYNCH. . . . . . . MARTINSON. . . PEARCE.. . . .. lz"� -k 3/1/83 MAY 11, 1983 JOINT MEETING NOTES #3 - Recognition of persons who wish to be heard Ed Woolsey re Item No. 14 .� Gary Ryner re Item Nos. 14 and 17 Richard Durkee re Item No. 17 #14 - Hearing re proposed Ordinances (Item considered right after agenda item 5) (b) - Report of Staff REL referred to I.W. Ordinance mailed to Directors incorporating changes since 1976 and also changes required by EPA and SWRCB. An ad hoc committee was established made up of industries we serve and representatives from the Chamber of Commerce--approximately 30 people. Met with Districts' staff and they also met independently to supply information to staff. It has been a cooperative effort. During the past few days have received some letter comments from industries. Referred to tan-colored staff report that has some of the written comments and staff's response to comments. REL briefly reviewed their concerns. (See attached report) Ray added that the ad hoc committee met the previous night and staff has not had time to respond to comments from that meeting but will do so before June lst Board meeting. Said revisions before Directors tonight are ones that we have been working on for seven years. Changes incorporate EPA's requirements which have been finalized. Will mostly affect electroplating and metal finishing firms. Have put in noncompliance fees that are far more substantial than they have been in the past. Have a progressive type of noncompliance fee based on the frequency of violations. The purpose is not to collect noncompliance fees but to get everybody in compliance. Ray then thanked members of the ad hoc committee for their many hours and the input they have had, even though we were not in agreement in some areas. Said staff feels that noncompliance fees are fair and representative of violations associated therewith. Cooper asked how much time the ad hoc committee put in. REL replied that they met on three different occasions with staff for 2-3 hours a meeting. Also had three other meetings independent of the Districts' staff. Cooper added that they seem to have evaluated properly all of the material. REL agreed. Said he believed the ad hoc committee had gone through it very thoroughly. Sylvia commented that all the written comments originated from firms in the city of Fullerton and wondered if there was any significance in that. Ray said it just seemed to happen that way, no significance. REL added that a copy of proposed ordinance was mailed to every permitted ilk industry of the Sanitation Districts and to everyone affected by this ordinance, including wastehaulers, industries and Class II permittees. i - Tom Woodruff then stated that there were a couple slight changes in wording to be made to the ordinance. Reviewed minor wording changes on page 41, top line of subsection (b) (2) - from "an additional" to "a total" penalty, and on third line from a maximum of "$3,000" to a maximum of "$4,000". Said item No. 3 should be deleted entirely. #14(d) (1) - Written comments received Written comments received from: Dated Cherry TEXTRON 5/11/83 Hunt Wesson Foods 4/22/83 Kaynar 4/27/83 Kimberly-Clark 5/10/83 Oscar Mayer 4/29/83 Re Cherry TEXTRON letter, REL said staff hasn't had an opportunity to review it yet but will report back to committee and Directors on June lst re letter. #14(d) (2) - Oral comments Ed Woolsey from Cherry TEXTRON was first recognize by the Chairman. Said he was responsible for a lot of the ad hoc committee correspondence to the Districts. Said there were two more letters dated /19 and 4/22 that should be received and filed also. Said he put in about 15 hours on this. Felt it was a short period of time but the people working with them were quite helpful. Felt they have gone through the regulations as well as possible, but continual changes were thrown at them along the line. Said his comments are pretty well covered in correspondence. Gary Ryan from Aroscientific was then recognized. He stated that it was his understanding that the public hearing would be held over until June lst because the committee had not received any comment on their last letter. He was told, no, that is not true. REL stated that the staff has not responded to comments dated May llth because they have not had time to take them into full consideration. Said responses will be made to the ad hoc committee prior to June 1st. Recommendations could be made at the June lst meeting and if the Board elects to go along with staff and ad hoc committee recommendations, can do that without a public hearing. TLW added that the Board can reconsider new evidence and amend the ordinance at any time but cautioned that any substantive changes made at the June lst meeting could necessitate another reading of the ordinance. That would not be acceptable to the Districts as it is mandated by EPA that this ordinance be adopted and in effect by June 1st. They have delivered a message in no uncertain terms that we can look for serious problems with EPA if we don't have. it adopted. If there is a major change, even if ordinance is adopted, can still change it at the next meeting. Hope that we would get the best possible document for the Board which addresses all of the concerns at the time this ordinance is adopted. Vardoulis stated he thought we were down to a few issues that hopefully can be handled by staff. If Directors wish to have an opportunity to to see what these issues are and discuss them at the next meeting, maybe the ideal thing is to continue the public hearing to June lst. Sylvia suggested if Directors made any substantive changes on June 1st, could maybe adopt ordinance on the 8th. Was advised that this must be adopted on the 1st. Asked if Mr. Ryan's comments affected all the Districts. TLW replied that all the ordinances, with the exception of the connection fees, are identical. Roth stated that we should make a decision on what we are going to do tonight so we don't make any changes on the lst. -2- FAH indicated that he hadn't seen the letter but suggested that maybe the questions that are being asked should be mentioned at this time so the Board will have an idea of what their concerns are. Staff may not be able to answer at this time but Board will know some of the concerns. Wedaa asked REL if changes requested are minor or major? REL answered he didn't feel that the letter received today will have any major affect on the final adoption of the ordinance. Would not make any substantive change to the ordinance even if comments taken in full and adopted. Riley asked that the letter be read. REL then reviewed suggestions and commented. Re page 17 Section 302.2 of the ordinance, items (j) & (k) , they felt that these two provisions were too broad and too general. Staff feels that it would be difficult to try to envision in an ordinance all of the limitations and conditions that we want to put in a permit. May overlook something. Is kind of a catch-all phrase. TLW added that while those are general catch-all phrases, we have several hundred different industries and no two are the same so can't address everybody in the ordinance. If permit applicant disagrees with permit conditions can bring it to the Board and have it resolved. (See pg. 22) Those provisions have been in existing ordinances for seven years. REL then referred to page 35, Section 601(b) . Ad hoc committee feels that where we take samples, that sample should be split in volume so that they can analyze it independently to confirm or substantiate our analysis. Said we have no problem with that and, in fact, do it in many cases. Feel that that should be a procedural thing and not in the ordinance though. Along with the adoption of this ordinace, will have an I.W. Procedural Manual available to the public and this procedure will be incorporated into that. If Directors feel that it should be incorporated into ordinance, have no strong feelings against it. Another comment was regarding Section 601(c) . This was already defined in Section Are reluctant to but would put in in there also. TLW then commented re page 29, Section 308, re excess capacity charge. Very / broad and general. All it really says is that the Board of Directors reserves the right on a case-by-case basis to make a decision. Said it is conceivable that a change in an operation could be so dramatic that the original fee would not be appropriate. That decision would be made by this Board. The ad hoc committee feels that this is a limited growth policy. Sections 302 and 303 are simply the permit conditions. If conditions will change the permit, don't believe 302.2 and 303.2 really covers it. REL added that that particular item was greatly discussed by the Executive Committee. L.A. City and County have a very specific type of excess capacity charge in their ordinances. We have had some of the industries come from LA County to Orange County to locate. Have no problem with that as long as they pay their fair and equitable share. Feel Section 308 should stay as is. TLW commented re page 41, Section 602, re reinstatement deposit. Ad hoc committee says it is more accurately described as a performance bond and recommends a fee schedule be included. When discharge quantities and qualities are different and their charges are different, there is no way to address that idea. Sometimes enforcement proceedings are for nonpayment of charges. We don't quite have the speedy system and leverage of disconnecting as do the cities. Have a very difficult problem. REL added that we feel that if any permittee was subject to this reinstatement deposit, and feels that amount is in excess, could appeal to the Board. To write a fee schedule, would require a schedule as thick as the ordinance itself. -3- Vardoulis stated that it is clear that this reinstatement deposit is appealable and can end up before this Board. Staff reaffirmed that. The Chair then recognized Paul Torres representing the Orange County Metal Finishers' Guild Association and as a member of the ad hoc committee. Said he would like to clarify one thing. The excess capacity charge is a major concern of the ad hoc committee and they feel it is already covered in the permit conditions under Section 302.2, Subsection (b) , pg. 16. Said that is a condition of the permit and feel that it covers the excess capacity charges. Said he was opposed to it and would like to have it deleted. REL replied that the excess capacity charge is really for collection of capital charges. In writing permit, can' t limit time of day that operator discharges to the sewer system. No way we could write permit to allow discharge between 12 p.m. and 7 a.m. The sewer fees incorporated in the ordinance are for volume, B.O.D. and suspended solids for operating costs not for capital. Don't feel that this section is applicable to this type of charge. Has to be brought before this Board on a case-by-case basis to determine what that charge should be. What we do here determines what SAWPA will do in San Bernardino County also. Feel very strongly that this should be put in to be consistent with LA County and City and so that industries pay their fair and equitable share. Frank Elwell, Shurplate Corporation, then spoke. Re Section 208 (a) , wondered if this applies to their mass emission? REL said this was very much discussed with the ad hoc committee. Seven years ago adopted I.W. Ordinance with mass emission limitations to the sewer. The mass affects our process and what goes into the ocean. Do not want to permit pollution by dilution. Had one industry that went from 50,000 to 5,000 mgd. Did not change his mass because we encourage that type of reduction. Have been in a constant battle with EPA in trying to get them to accept this. We are so much lower than the California Ocean Plan. They were appalled that we could reduce it so low. EPA still wants to go back to a concentration. Still will write our permits to continue with mass emissions and will still he in compliance with EPA. We hope that EPA will come around to our way of thinking. Mass emissions in ordinance will stay that way. Mr. Elwell asked if this was going to apply to their discharge that goes out? Was answered, yes, just like in the past. Tom Brown, AMF Voit, then addressed the Board. Said his real concern was over mass emissions and excess capacity. Most industries are down on flow and hope to be up tomorrow. Don' t want a clause that would bind them to their capacity today. Feel that the way the ordinance is written today is too general and could be interpreted differently by someone new. Don't feel that ordinances should be written with those loose clauses. Another matter is the I.W. Procedural Manual. Have been asking for a manual for a long time. Feel District should have a procedural manual on how to monitor all wastewater. Should be made available to everybody. Would like to have it mentioned in the ordinance so it will become a fact. REL stated that the procedural manual will be drafted after the ordinance is adopted. Will be available within 60 days after enactment of this ordinance. 1#14 (e) - Incorporating final suggestions TLW said if the wish of the Board is to incorporate any of the revisions that they have heard requested verbally by any of the persons addressing the Board, would suggest that that should be done at this time. -4- i" REL stated he there are three of them he would like the Board to consider: (1) Referred to tan-colored report, Suggested that Table I of Section 208 be modified to separate the PCB's and pesticides from total toxic organics. i I (2) Would go along with ad hoc committee re May llth request re Section 601(c) . Is redundant but will clarify that that program is for a 10-day period. (3) Also that TLW's changes re Section 601.9(b) be incorporated. (See last paragraph on page 1 of these notes) Vardoulis indicated that he thought that covers most of the concerns. Asked that staff address the excess capacity charge. Thought it needs clarification. Said he concurs with staff that it is a capital cost. Don't see it happening on this Board but maybe 10 years from now, somebody could interpret it differently. Thought the language could be modified a little to better arrive at the intent. REL stated that before June 1st the staff would research it and have something for the Directors and ad hoc committee. Maybe can clarify it but not change the substance. Edgar commented that perhaps there could be a threshhold that could be identified that would not require this type of value. Said Executive Committee considered this very closely. Asked for any other suggestions from Directors. Edgar moved that REL's / suggestions be incorporated. Motion seconded and carried. No opposition. Pattinson asked if the hearing should be kept open? Riley stated that they had l discussed everything of concern. It was then moved and seconded to close the hearing. Hearing closed at 8:35 p.m. #14(g) TLW stated that because of the amendments the Board had just incorporated into the ordinances, this motion will be to declare intent to adopt the ordinances, as amended, on June lst. Ordinances will be the yellow book with the above three amendments. Vardoulis asked if they still could change the wording on the excess capacity charges. Tom answered, yes, could still make changes then. -5- 16 - Election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem TLW briefly explained election procedure. Will elect District Chairmen tonight. Next month will be nominations for Joint Chairman and the following month will be the election of Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. Mentioned that District 1 did have a quorum present even though 2 of the 3 present were Alternate Directors. Asked if they wanted to proceed with election of their Chairman. They indicated yes. DISTRICT 1 - Robert Hanson nominated and elected Chairman. Robert Luxembourger nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. / DISTRICT 2 - Henry Wedaa nominated and elected Chairman. / Don Roth nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 3 - Bruce Finlayson nominated and elected Chairman. Frank Laszlo nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 - Evelyn Hart nominated and elected Chairman. Philip Maurer nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 6 - Elvin Hutchison nominated and elected Chairman. Ruthelyn Plummer nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 7 - Richard Edgar nominated and elected Chairman. Don Smith nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 - Ruth Bailey nominated and elected Chairman. Harriett Wieder nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. #Y(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman Chairman Holt reported that as the Joint Chairman on April 21st he appeared before the State Water Resources Control Board in Sacramento at a hearing on the Draft EIR amending the California Ocean Plan. Resolution No. 83-33, which was adopted by our Boards on April 13th in support of the 14 Position Papers prepared by the technical ad hoc committee of the coastal entities known as the California Ocean Dischargers, was presented. He said he focused on proposed Footnote No. 16 which, under certain conditions, on a case-by-case basis, would permit the discharge of municipal sludges to the ocean on an interim basis. He stated that the State Board staff recommenda- tions were logical, cautious and conservative, which we believe to be proper. He added that he also indicated that Footnote No. 16 is consistent with the current policy of EPA based on the statement of the Assistant Administrator for Water, U.S. EPA, before the two subcommittees of the House, Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives, March 15th of this year. We included in our testimony for the record the Assistant Administrator's formal statement. We also included in our testimony a copy of AMSA's recommendations on management of municipal sewage sludge to the EPA Sludge Task Force. These recommendations covered land based alternatives such as composting, recycling, landfill burial, as well as incineration, and ocean disposal management. We indicated that the AMSA Ocean Management recommendations are consistent with State Board staff `� recommendations for Footnote No. 16. Two of the State Board members complimented us on our presentation as to the tenor of our remarks, as well as the completeness of the backup material. The public comment period, relative to the Ocean Plan Amendments, will soon be over and we expect a decision on the suggested changes to the Ocean Plan to be acted upon within the next 45 days. Chairman Holt then reported that CASA held a meeting in Sacramento the past weekend and asked Director Edgar and Tom Woodruff to comment if they wished. Edgar said that there was nothing too controversial discussed. Continued with items discussed at previous conferences. TLW added that the CASA meeting was in direct conflict with the CWPCA Conference and attendance was very low--125 instead of the usual 325-350. Said that the Attorneys Committee did meet. A recommendation of the Executive Committee was to seek amendments to SB 270 re AQMD Permits. Recommendation was to instruct our legislative advocate for CASA to seek a proposed amendment to include sewer agencies. If adopted, this would allow for us to operate various equipment that we now have to submit and pay substantial fees on. No indication of any possibility of success. The Bill got tremendous bipartisan support. If we could get an amendment, it would be beneficial. 04) - Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper reported that this past week he attended a National Ocean Disposal Symposium on Ocean Waste Management policy and strategy. Was the third meeting in the United States and fifth meeting internationally in the last two years. A few years ago it was the intent of Congress to take out anything to do with ocean disposal. Since then we have learned quite a bit about the ocean and the effects of discharge into the ocean and also about the effects of putting things on the land. A group of scientists came together to discuss policies they can recommend to EPA. New buzz word is "multi-media approach" which is to consider all media and come up with the best answer. Can't make a rule and have everybody comply with the same thing. Have talked to Willard Bascom, Director of SCCWRP, about the possibility of having a small meeting for a couple days and invite some of these people to talk to some of the people here, particularly the EPA Region IX people and State people, so they can have a better understanding. Mr. Harper added that he made his presentation at the symposium just following the New York Commissioner, which was a little bit unfortunate for New York, as most of his talk was what they can't do, and FAH's was much more positive re what we have done in our I.W. program. Said he didn't really try to sell our research project re sludge to the ocean but it was consistent with multi-media approach of trying to find the best answer and trying to solve the pollution and toxic waste problems. FAH reported further on some good news that NOAA in Washington, D.C. has authorized three additional efforts. Will have one ship in this area to collect data in the area in which we hope to discharge. Also have authorized their marine group in Seattle to do studies. They are also authorizing SCCWRP to employ additional current meters in deep ocean canyons between here and Catalina. New commitments for those three will total about $150,000. Mr. Harper said we are continuing discussions with EPA and the House and Senate staff members in Washington, D.C. but it is still questionable whether we will have some legislation this year. Are are still working on it though. -7- r� #Y(c) - Report of the General Counsel TLW reported re Supplemental Agenda Item #16 (b) that the Districts were served last week with a Summons and Cross Complaint as a result of construction of some storage facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24-2. C. Norman Peterson is the contractor. Said he couldn't report too much about it yet but will have a full report by the next Board meeting. #13(c) - Re GM participation in technical program in China �0 Don Holt commented that our General Manager really stands out among managment / �people. The fact that he has been invited to go to China for a technical J exchange is quite an honor. FAH advised that he understood that the Chinese will choose who they want to come so is a possibility he may not go. jp�-1 5 - Re P2-23-6 VO L reported that after many, many years, we have finally completed the project own as Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job . P2-23-6. This is the project in which we have received a $7.3 million claim om the contractor, which the staff and General Counsel are still working on. However, the work is complete and the recommendation is to accept the job as complete. We have not been able to reach a final closeout agreement because of the claim. Hope we can work with the committee that has been established by the Joint Chairman and resolve this by the end of the month. TLW added that as Directors' know, we usually have a closeout agreement at the time of accepting a job as complete. Because of the magnitude of this claim, we attempted a closeout agreement but just couldn't reach an agreement and don' t think we ever will. By accepting the job as complete, don't think there is any prejudice by the District. We will file a Notice of Completion and start the lien time - 35 days (or 90 days if we don't file) . This will have no baring on the lawsuit. Will show there is no bad faith on the part of this District. 1117 - DISTRICT 1 - V.A.L. Circuits Richard Durkee, Custom Systems, Inc. , requested that he be allowed to address the Board. He indicated that the technology presently installed at V.A.L. Circuits is the same as at Cosmotronics. Based on the staff's monitoring of Cosmotronics, they have reduced water usage 60% and are getting an overall better quality and have eliminated their acid discharge and reduced their copper discharge to 1/4 lb. per day based on $1 million production figure. One thing circuit board companies are concerned about is expense. Not a great expense to / J virtually eliminate copper. Supplier or manufacturer of equipment must maintain the equipment. Referred to copy of his report on the tables.?? Said there is no need for the printed board shops and Sanitation Districts to struggle with the problem of pollutants. Hanson asked if this equipment has been installed yet at V.A.L. Circuits? Durkee said equipment was installed immediately after revocation of permit. Has been in operation. (No comment from staff--see written report) It was then moved and seconded to approve staff's recommendation. Chairman cast a unanimous ballot. -8- 129 - DISTRICT 6 - proposed user fee program JWS referred to updated material in Directors' folders re user fees for District 6. He then reviewed report in folders and proposed fees to be charged. (SEE REPORT) Advised that staff will analyze the financial situation annuallv and will come to the Board with information before fees wi "` n Experience in District 5, through some cost-saving efforts raise fees the second year, as anticipated. Hope to exper n Q Q situation in District 6. Reported that the consultant del paste-up of the notice that will be sent to all of the pro District. He had not yet made up the charts for the Costa ?� District that will be included in the notice, but will be office tomorrow and will have it when we appear before the evening. Said notice will be mailed to every property owns " the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. Very similar to the notice used in District 5. Reviewed the notice form. Advised the Board that there will be several staff members available to answer any inquiries on the telephone. JWS indicated that implementation schedule in Directors' folders has been updated. Notices are scheduled to go in the mail on May 23rd. Went through list of items on schedule re various workshops and dates of publications, etc. First reading of ordinance is on June 1st and on June 9th is a joint meeting of the CMSD and District 6 at the Costa Mesa City Hall to hold the public hearing and adopt the sewer fee program. JWS recommended that an action be taken tonight to fix June 9th at 7:30 p.m. as /the time and place for public hearing on the proposed sewer fee. (/ FAH added that the mailout would be modified to include the information of the CMSD and hopefully will have that by tomorrow night. Holt commented that this was a very professional job. Plummer asked if members of the Board should be at the public workshops? JWS answered that they are welcome to attend but in District 5 the staff conducted the workshops and took some of the heat before Directors met with the public. Hanson asked if CMSD Directors should be at public workshops? JWS said they are welcome to attend also but that is up to the Sanitary District Board. Members would be required to be at the public hearing though. Holt questioned re single family dwellings, what is the average number of persons? JWS advised that we don't really use the number of people in determining that rate. We determine what the financial shortfalls of the District are and then back into the number. Holt also asked re multiple dwellings and commercial property if they are both charged per 1000 sq. ft. JWS replied that multiple dwellings are a fixed fee or flat rate not per 1000 sq. ft. as shown on yellow sheet. Commercial is per 1000 sq. ft. Plummer asked re hotels and large dischargers, didn't see them mentioned with any special fee. Wayne explained that they will be covered under the I.W. Ordinance and will pick up additional charges through that separate ordinance. Districts then give credit for I.W. Permit fees paid. -9- It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That June 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the Costa Mesa City Hall, be, and is hereby, tablished as the date, time and place for a public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 607, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges. -10- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. It 21 31 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 11, 1983 Ytop. Q r � rc v C� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on May 11, 1983 at 7:30 p.m. , in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: X Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank Robert Luxembourger, Chairman pro tem Gordon Bricken Don Saltarelli X Richard Edgar .Roger Stanton X Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 2: X Henry Wedaa, Chairman Todd Murphy X Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr X Barbara Brown Ben Nielsen X Sam Cooper Norma Hicks X Donald Holt Robert Kuznik Carol Kawanami William Odlum Robert Luxembourger Gorden Bricken • Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bob Perry Norman Culver X Don Smith Gene Beyer Dorothy Wedel X John Holmberg X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: X Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Roland Edwards X Frank Laszlo, Chairman pro tem Willemke Vanderstaay X Marvin Adler Ben Nielsen X Norman Culver Bob Perry X Henry Frese Norma Seidel X Don Griffin James Jarrell Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken X Robert Mandic, Jr. Ruth Finley X Gerald Mullen Otto Lacayo X Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper X Charles Rell Frank Marshott Earl Roget X Dorothy Wedel X Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr X Charles Sylvia Kenneth Zommick X Harriett Wieder Bruce Nestande X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: X Evelyn Hart, Chairman John Cox X Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem Bill Agee X Thomas Riley Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: X Elvin Hutchison, Chairman Orma Crank X Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart Roger Stanton X Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 7: X Richard Edgar, Chairman Don Saltarelli X Don Smith, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer X Jacqueline Heather Evelyn Hart Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran X James Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: X Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister X Harriett Wieder, Chairman pro tem Bruce Nestande X Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister -2- 5/11/83 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Ray E. Lewis, William Clarke, Tom Dawes, Blake Anderson, Rita Brow Penny Kyle, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Pete Barotti, Tom Brown, Richard Durkee, Frank Elwell, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Gary Ryan, Paul Torres, Ed Woolsey, Tom Brown * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 2 & 3 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file resignation of Mayor LeQuire and minute excerpt That the letter from Linda LeQuire, Mayor of re Board Appointment for Fullerton the City of Fullerton, advising of her resignation as Director on the Boards of County- Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 3, be and is hereby, received and ordered filed. FURTHER MOVED: That the minute excerpt from the City of Fullerton re appointment of- alternate Directors be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: District(s) Active Director Alternate Director 2 & 3 Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT 2 & 3 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the City of La Habra re appointment of Directors, be and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and that thelfollowing representatives be seated as members of the Boards. (*Mayor) District(s) Active Director Alternate Director 2 John Holmberg Kent A. Roberts 3 Dorothy Wedel* John Holmberg m DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the - Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be 114� deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. EACH DISTRICT This being the time and place heretofore First reading and hearing of established for the first reading and proposed Ordinances Establishing hearing on revisions to the Uniform Re alations for Use of Districts' Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Sewerage Facilities Use of District Sewerage Facilities of each respective District, the Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:42 p.m. Staff Report The Chief Engineer referred the Directors' to the latest draft of the proposed Uniform Ordinances Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, which had been mailed to the Board Members with their agenda. Mr. Lewis advised the Directors that the ordinance incorporates the changes required by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA ) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) as well as those recommended by the staff since adoption of the original ordinance in 1976. A summary of the proposed changes was also mailed to all industries currently under permit by the Districts. An ad hoc committee of approximately 30 representatives from the industrial community and the Orange County Chamber of Commerce was formed, and this group met both with the staff and independently on several occasions to comment on the proposed changes to the ordinance. Mr. Lewis then acknowledged the efforts of the ad hoc committee, chaired by Mr. E.J. Woolsey of Cherry-Textron, on behalf of the Districts staff, and thanked committee members for their work. Mr. Lewis advised the Directors that the major changes proposed in the ordinance included incorporation of the EPA's Categorical Pretreatment Standards and significant increases in non-compliance fees. Lewis indicated that it was not the Districts' intention to generate more revenue from the fee increases, but to encourage the permittees to comply with the ordinance. He also noted that the EPA standards will have the greatest impact on the electro-plating and metal-finishing industries. -4- 5/11/83 The General Counsel then advised the Directors of a minor wording clarification in Section 601.9, Payment of Charges and Delinquencies, re the maximum penalty of $4,000. DISTRICT 1 It was moved, seconded and �J First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 104 That Ordinance No. 104, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities be read by title only; and, FURTHER_ MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 104 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 104, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and repealing Ordinance No. 103, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 2 It was moved, seconded and First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 205 That Ordinance No. 205, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waives Following the reading of Ordinance No. 205 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 205, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,, and repealing Ordinance No. 204, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 3 It was moved, seconded and First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 306 That Ordinance No. 306, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 306 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 306, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and repealing Ordinance No. 305, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. -5- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 5 It was moved, seconded and First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 514 That Ordinance No. 514, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 514 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 514, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 508 and 510, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 6 It was moved, seconded and First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 606 That Ordinance No. 606, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 606 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 606, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 603 and 605, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 7 It was moved, seconded and First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 718 That Ordinance No. 718, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 718 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 718, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 716 and 717, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 11 It was moved, seconded and First reading of proposed unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 1106 `a✓ That Ordinance No. 1106, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, -6- 5/11/83 FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1106 by title only, it was then moved seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1106, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 1103 and 1105, be introduced and passed to the second reading on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District' s administrative office. ALL DISTRICTS The Chief Engineer reported that Receive and file letters from written comments had been received various industries re proposed regarding the proposed ordinance ordinances from various industrial dischargers served by the Districts. Mr. Lewis reviewed the comments which were summarized on a report dated May 11, 1983, and included in the Directors' meeting folders. It was then: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written communications from the following industries regarding the proposed Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: Industry Location Date of Letter Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. Fullerton April 22, 1983 Kaynar/Microdot Fastening Fullerton April 27, 1983 Systems �.•� Oscar Mayer Fullerton April 29, 1983 Kimberly-Clark Fullerton May 10, 1983 Mr. Lewis reported that written comments dated May 11, 1983, from the ad hoc committee on Cherry Textron' s letterhead had been delivered prior to the Board meeting but that staff had not yet had an opportunity to review them. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the letter from Cherry-Textron dated May 11, 1983, be and is hereby received and ordered filed. Oral comments and discussion The Chairman then recognized Mr. re proposed ordinance Edward J. Woolsey of Cherry-Textron, the chairman of the ad hoc committee, who explained the activities of the committee and thanked the Directors and staff for the opportunity the Districts had given to the industrial community to respond to the ordinance prior to its consideration. He highlighted changes that the ad hoc committee had proposed to the staff in his May llth letter, and also referred to written communications from the ad hoc committee to Districts' staff dated April 19th and 22nd. Mr. Gary Ryan of Aeroscientific Corporation was then recognized. He asked the Boards if the hearing might be kept open until June lst to enable staff to respond to the comments outlined by the ad hoc committee in Mr. Woolsey's letter of May llth. -7- 5/11/83 Following a review of ordinance adoption procedures and EPA requirements for approval of the industrial waste ordinance by the General Counsel, the Chief Engineer reviewed the items in the May llth letter from Cherry-Textron on Section 302.23 and R, Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations; 303.2H, Class II Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations; 308, Excess Capacity Charge; 601A, B and C re Sampling, Preliminary Determination of Non-Compliance and Sample -and Evaluation Program; and 602, Reinstatement Deposit. He and the General Counsel commented on each point during the review. The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Paul Torres of the Orange County Metal Finishers Association, who commented on the excess capacity charge; Mr. Frank Elwell of Shurplate Corporation, who commented on the mass emission policy; and Mr. Tan Voit of AMF Voit, who commented on the mass emission policy, the excess capacity charge and inquired about the proposed Industrial Waste Division procedures manual. Incorporating final changes in The Chief Engineer then recommended ordinance wording additional changes in wording be incorporated into the ordinance as suggested by the staff in response to written comments received from permittees as summarized on the report dated May 11, 1983 included in the Directors' agenda folders as follows: In Table I, eliminate the discharge limits for Total Identifiable Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (TICH) of 0.02 mg/l and replace with the following limits: PCB's and Pesticides 0.02 mg/l Total Toxic Organics 0.58 mg/l �..d A change from a flow-based non-compliance fee for violation of the pH limits to a flat fee for each day of violation. This change recommended by the ad hoc committee was already incorporated into Table III. He also recommended that the wording be changed to specifically define the duration of the Sampling and Evaluation Program outlined in Section 601(C) , as ten working days as suggested in the Cherry-Textron letter of May llth. The General Counsel also recommended approval of his previously announced clarification of wording to Section 601.9.B.2 and 3 re maximum penalty of $4,000 for delinquencies. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That said recommended changes in wording to the draft Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities be and are hereby ordered incorporated into said ordinance wording. The Boards then reviewed the language of Section 308, Excess Capacity Charge. The staff reported that the intent of this section is to assure that high users of Districts' facilities be required to pay their fair share of the added capital cost to provide service capacity. It is felt that by reviewing on a case-by-case basis the circumstances regarding new permittees that place a significant demand on the Districts' system and existing permittees that substantially expand their operation and thus increase their system loading, a `w• policy based on our experience with actual situations would evolve over the next few years that could then be incorporated into the ordinance. This is consistent with the Executive Committee' s conceptual endorsement of this new item in the ordinance. -8- 5/11/83 Because of the broad and general nature of the language in this section staff was requested to review it and report back to the Boards at the June 1st meeting when the ordinance is considered for final adoption. Close Public Hearing Following a brief discussion in which b,.„J General Counsel advised that the Directors could make further changes to the amended ordinances at the adjourned meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors on June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative offices, it was: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That public hearing re proposed Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities be closed. The chairman then declared the public hearing closed at 8:35 p.m. DISTRICT 1 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 104, as amended, on June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 104, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 2 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 205, as amended, on �. June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 205, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 3 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 306, as amended, on June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 306, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District' s administrative office. DISTRICT 5 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 514, as amended, on June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 514, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at- an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District' s administrative office. -9- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 6 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 606, as amended, on June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 606, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 7 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 718, as amended, on June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 718, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT -11 It was moved, seconded and duly Declaring intent to adopt carried: Ordinance No. 1106, as amended, on June 1, 1983 That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 hereby declares its intent to adopt Ordinance No. 1104, An Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as hereinabove amended, at an adjourned meeting to be held June 1, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the District' s administrative office. DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman ro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Robert Hanson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hanson as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Robert Luxembourger be nominated a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Luxembourger as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Henry Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as Chairman. -10- 5/11/83 It was further moved and seconded: That Director Don Roth be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Roth as Chairman pro tem. .%.) DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Bruce Finlayson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Finlayson as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Frank Laszlo be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Laszlo as Chairman pro tern. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Philip Maurer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tern. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Maurer as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Elvin Hutchison be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hutchison as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tern. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as Chairman pro tem. -11- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Richard Edgar be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Edgar as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Don Smith be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Ruth Bailey be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Bailey as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Harriett Wieder be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wieder as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt reported that he had Report of the Joint Chairman appeared before the State Water Resources Control Board at a hearing on the Draft EIR amending the California Ocean Plan. In his capacity as Joint Chairman, he presented the Districts' position regarding various elements of the plan as set forth in Resolution No. 83-33, adopted by the Joint Boards at their April 13 meeting. This resolution supports 14 position papers prepared by an ad hoc committee of wastewater agencies known as the California Ocean Dischargers, of which the Districts are a member agency. Chairman Holt indicated that his remarks to the State Board primarily addressed Footnote No. 16 to the Plan. This Footnote permits the discharge of municipal sewage sludge to the ocean on a case-by-case interim basis if an agency meets certain conditions defined in the footnote. Holt advised the State Board that the Districts supported the State Board staff's approach to this issue, which we feel is logical, cautious and conservative. He further indicated that he requested that the remarks made March 15 by the EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water, Mr. Frederic A. Eidsness, Jr. , before two subcommittees of the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee, be entered into the record of the hearing. Eidsness' remarks outlined the EPA's current policy regarding ocean discharge of municipal sewage sludge. The EPA policy is consistent with the State Board's proposed policy defined in Footnote 16. The Joint Chairman also entered a copy of the AMSA recommendations on management of municipal sewage sludge to the EPA Sludge Task Force into the record. These -12- 5/11/83 recommendations, which address land-based sludge disposal alternatives such as composting, recycling and landfill burial as well as incineration and ocean disposal, are also consistent with the State Board staff recommendations outlined in Footnote I6. � Chairman Holt advised the Directors that two members of the State Board complimented the Districts for the professionalism displayed in both our prepared remarks and the documentation presented in support of his testimony. A decision regarding the proposed changes to the Ocean Plan is expected in the next 45 days. Holt asked Director Edgar and the General Counsel to report on their participation at the CASA meeting in Sacramento earlier this month. Edgar and the General Counsel reported that the CASA members continued discussions on items of general interest such as contractor claims and EPA grant audits, and also discussed amendments to Senate Bill 270 to exempt wastewater agencies from AQMD permit requirements for certain types of equipment. Mr. Woodruff advised that such an.amendment could result in major cost avoidance for the Districts, and indicated that- the CASA staff was directed to attempt to introduce an amendment to the legislation. Chairman Holt announced a meeting of the Fiscal Policy Committee to be held at 4:30 p.m. , May 19, to consider the 1983-84 Joint Operating (JO) and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budgets for recommendation to the Executive Committee which will meet on June 1st. Mr. Holt then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for 5:30 p.m. , June 1, and invited Directors Robert Mandic and Philip Maurer to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Holt reminded the Directors of the June 1st adjourned meeting of the Joint Boards to consider adoption of the industrial waste ordinances discussed at the public hearing held earlier in the meeting. The Chairman also announced a joint meeting of the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts and the Fiscal Policy Committee on June 8 at 5:00 p.m. , immediately preceding the regular June Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that he had Report of the General Manager attended a National Ocean Disposal Symposium on ocean waste management policy and strategy earlier in the month. The symposium was attended by a broad range of professionals, including scientists and policymakers from federal, state and local agencies throughout the U.S. Mr. Harper indicated that the purposes of the conference were to disseminate and discuss management approaches as well as technical- data about the impact of waste disposal on the oceans, and attempt to develop comprehensive ocean disposal policies and strategies to recommend to EPA. He advised the Directors that he had made a presentation to the conference regarding the Districts' proposed ocean disposal research project, and also outlined the effectiveness of our industrial waste source control program since its inception in 1976. Mr. Harper presented the Districts' position in a positive light in contrast to the difficulties faced by ocean dischargers on the East Coast, and suggested to the Directors that the staff is considering joint sponsorship with SCCWRP of a similar conference on the West Coast with EPA Region IX and State Board staff personnel to help expand their understanding of the issues. The General Manager reported that NOAA has authorized an additional $150,000 in oc&- W) research efforts in our area for three projects. These projects include assignment -13- 5/11/83 of an oceanographic ship to collect data in the proposed sludge outfall discharge area, funding for SCCWRP placement of additional current meters in local deep ocean canyons, and other local study efforts by the NOAA marine research office in Seattle. Mr. Harper also advised the Directors that the staff and our consultants are meeting routinely with the House and Senate staffs as well as EPA officials in Washington, but we are uncertain if our efforts will result in any productive legislation this year because of other events occurring in the Capitol this year. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel called the Report of the General Counsel Directors' attention to an item on the supplemental agenda regarding a cross-complaint filed in Orange County Superior Court against the Districts by Westates Carbon Company, Inc. The cross-complaint involves construction of the dewatering and dry storage facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24-2. Mr. Woodruff advised the Directors that, in his opinion, C. Norman Peterson, the contractor on this job, was not able to effectively represent the Districts in spite of Peterson's contractual obligations to do so because of related legal action against them by Westates. The requested action is to authorize the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts in this case. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on Pages "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 4 06 83 4 20 83 � ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 283,364.70 $ 188,149.44 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 148,648.61 113,633.08 Joint Working Capital Fund - 65,894.84 55,452.07 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,107.87 5,583.33 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,113.51 5,808.51 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 1,536.19 12,346.75 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 21,351.70 3,301.65 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 158.74 1,759.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 8,231.24 3,844.04 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 256,779.72 11,344.35 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 2,368.22 2,639.40 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 4,567.12 3,535.70 $ 807,122.46 $ 407,397.32 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and Job No. P2-25-1A specifications for Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, authorizing an addition of $3,973.00 to the contract with Hoagland-Artukovich, a Joint venture, for installation of steam traps at all `••� steamer connections, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days due to inclement weather conditions between February, 1982 and March, 1983, be and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -14- 5/11/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Specification No. E-133 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-53, approving plans and specifications for purchase of Six (6) Standard Samplers for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-133, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 12441 That the action of staff in issuing to Advanco Constructors, Inc. , for Purchase Order No. 12441 to Advanco emergency repairs Constructors, .Inc. in the amount of $14,710.00 for emergency repair of frozen plug valve on aeration basin drain line at Plant No. 1 be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of membership in CCA That renewal of membership in the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) for the period of May 1, 1983 through April 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of annual dues in the amount of $8,000 be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing one staff member to attend the ASCE Convention in That the General Manager be, and is Philadelphia, Pennsylvania hereby, authorized to designate one staff member to attend the American Society of Civil Engineers' Spring Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on May 15-19, 1983; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Chief of Procurement to attend the That the Chief of Procurement be, and is International Purchasing hereby, authorized to attend the 68th Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada _ Annual International Purchasing Conference on May 22-25, 1983, in Las Vegas, Nevada; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to solicit proposals for engineering services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to re Rehabilitation of Domes and solicit proposals and negotiate for engineering Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for services in connection with Rehabilitation o$ , Digesters C & D and E & H at Plant Domes and Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for No. 2, and Rehabilitation of Domes Digesters C & D and E & H at Plant No. 2, and and Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Rehabilitation of Dames and Sludge Pump Mixing Digesters 5 & 6 at Plant No. 1 Systems for Digesters 5 & 6 at Plant No. 1. -15- 5/11/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with John Carollo certification re final negotiated fee Engineers re preliminary desi2nn of with John Carollo Engineers re Job No P1-20 preliminary design (Phase 1) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary That the Boards of Directors hereby design of Job No. P1-20 adopt Resolution No. 83-54, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase 1) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, for a fixed fee plus reimbursement of actual indirect costs annd direct labor costs, including eligible overhead, on a per diem fee basis, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $342,455.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Comm- ittee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with John Carollo certification re final negotiated fee Engineers for preliminary design with John Carollo Engineers re of Job No. J-15 preliminary design (Phase 1) of Ocean Outf all Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary That the Boards of Directors hereby design of Job No. J-15 adopt Resolution No. 83-55, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase 1) of Ocean Outf all Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, for a fixed fee plus reimbursement of actual indirect costs and direct labor costs, including eligible overhead, on a per diem fee basis, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $276,094.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Declaring L & H Construction Co. in default and breach of the con- That L & H Construction Co. , a Joint tract for Miscellaneous Paving at Venture, be, and is hereby declared in Treatment Plant No. 2, Job default and breach of the contract for No. PW-098 Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, and; FURTHER MOVED: That the selection of Columbia Paving as the contractor for final performance of the job by the surety company be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving participation in Cal COMP feasibility study, and That participation in California authorizing procurement of labora- Cooperative Outfall Monitoring Project tory and other equipment and (Cal Comp) feasibility study be, and is supplies hereby approved; and, -16- 5/11/83 FURTHER MOVED: That procurement of laboratory and other equipment and supplies in a total amount not to exceed $20,000.00 necessary to conduct and participate in said study be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written report of �..� the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on April 27, 1983, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Plant No. _2 membership in the SCEC and authorizing That the Boards of Directors hereby execution of documents adopt Resolution No. 83-56, approving membership in the Southern California Energy Coalition re Districts' participation in their electric load management program at Plant No. 2, and authorizing execution of necessary documents in form approved by the General Counsel, and approving payment in the amount of $13,251.96 for implementation costs, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution re Summer Work Program That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-57, amending Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1983 summer work program for painting and grounds maintenance work, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Following comments and a recommendation Authorizing General Manager to by the Joint Chairman it was moved, participate as a member of a seconded and duly carried: special wastewater technology delegation to a technical program That the General Manager, be, and is in the Peoples' Republic of China hereby, authorized to participate as a member of a special wastewater technology delegation to a technical program in the Peoples' Republic of China, sponsored by People to People International, to be held September 12 through October 3, 1983; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby authorized. ALL DISTRICTS The Chief Engineer reported that the Accepting Job No. P2-23-6 as H.C. Smith Construction Company, complete contractor for Job. No. P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, has finally completed this project. Mr. Lewis reminded the Directors that the contractor has filed a $7.3 million claim against the Districts on this project which the staff, the General Counsel and our construction management consultants are evaluating at the present time. Mr. Lewis advised the Directors that the claim had precluded the staff from reaching a satisfactory closeout agreement with the contractor, however, since the work is finished, the Chief Engineer recommended that the Boards accept the job as complete. He indicated that staff will meet at the end of this month with the Special Claims Advisory Committee established by the Joint Chairman to further discuss resolution of the claim. -17- 5/11/83 The General Counsel advised that the Districts' position regarding the claim would not be prejudiced if we accepted the job as complete, and recommended that the Directors accept the job without a closeout agreement. Mr Woodruff further advised that this action would show good faith on the part of the Districts regarding our willingness to develop a closeout agreement and resolve the claim, yet would not have any bearing on potential litigation. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-58, accepting Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase That the General Manager, be, and is order of Pipe and Fittings for hereby, authorized to negotiate and Replacement of a Plant Water Line issue a purchase order for purchase of at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-4 Pipe and Fittings for Replacement of a Plant Water Line at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-4, for an amount not to exceed $35,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Counsel to appear and defend CSDOC re Cross- That the General Counsel, be, and is Complaint of Westates Carbon Com- hereby, authorized to appear and defend pany, Inc. , Superior Court Case the interests of the County Sanitation `.d No. 396995 Districts of Orange County California, in the matter of a Cross-Complaint of Westates Carbon Company, Inc. , et al. v. Orange County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 396995. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file communications declaring support of policy re That the communications from the having single Director represent following member agencies declaring all Districts support of recently adopted Districts' policy urging each member agency to have a single Director represent all Districts of which the agency is a member be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: Agency Date of Letter City of Fullerton May 10, 1983 Midway City Sanitary District May 9, 1983 City of Orange May 11, 1983 City of Yorba Linda May 5, 1983 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Comm- ittee to negotiate with Lowry & That the Selection Committee, be, and is Associates re design of Fullerton- hereby, authorized to negotiate with Brea Purchase Relief Trunk and Lowry and Associates re design of the Euclid Relief Trunk Fullerton-Brea Purchase Relief Trunk and the Euclid Relief Trunk projects. -18- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-59-2, ordering annexation of .51 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lowry & Asso- certification re final negotiated fee ciates for design of Contract with Lowry & Associates for design of No. 3-24-1 Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Katella Avenue from Western to Knott, Contract No. 3-24-1, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Contract That the Board of Directors hereby No. 3-24-1 adopts Resolution No. 83-60-3, approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Katella Avenue from Western to Knott, Contract No. 3-24-1, for a lump sum fee of $35,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lowry & Asso- certification re final negotiated fee ciates for design of Contract with Lowry & Associates for design of No. 3-24-2 Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Lampson Avenue from Western to Knott, Contract No. 3-24-2, be and is hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Contract That the Board of Directors hereby No. 3-24-2 adopts Resolution No. 83-61-3, approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Hoover-Western Relief Trunk Sewer, on Lampson Avenue from Western to Knott, Contract No. 3-24-2,for a lump sum fee of $22,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Lowry & Asso- certification re final negotiated fee ciates for design of Contract with Lowry & Associates for design of No. 3-25 Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, be and is hereby received and ordered filed. -19- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Contract That the Board of Directors hereby No. 3-25 adopts Resolution No. 83-62-3, approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for design of Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, for a lump sum fee of $25,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitaion District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving and authorizing execu- tion of Quitclaim Deed to the That the Board of Directors hereby Irvine Company re abandonment of adopts Resolution No. 83-63-5, approving Jamboree Road Pump Station and authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deed to the Irvine Company relative to abandonment of the Jamboree Road Pump Station, at no cost to the Irvine Company. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim submitted by Wilbern L. Bradley re The the claim submitted by Wilbern L. damages caused by a sewage backup Bradley in the amount of $1,340.94 for damages allegedly caused by a sewage backup, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed, and; FURTHER MOVED: That said claim is denied and referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other That the Board of Directors hereby affected agencies re Annexation adopts Resolution No. 83-64-7, waiving No. 115 - R-P-S Annexation ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected agencies re Annexation No. 115 - R-P-S Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -20- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request from Donald Sodaro re proposed That the request from Donald Sodaro Annexation No. 117 - Sodaro for annexation of 1.77 acres of Annexation territory to the District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Randall Street in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation. (Pursuant to a Letter of Understanding between the District and the City, the City of Orange will be the local sewering entity.) DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re Contract No. 11-13-3 That the Staff Report dated April 27, 1983, re Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and Contract No. 11-13-3 specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, authorizing an addition of $80,483.58 to the contract with Bubalo Construction Company for extra work due to discovery of nearly 200 undisclosed oil field utilities and repair of additional undisclosed electrical conduit for the City of Huntington Beach's street lights, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adj our nment ` That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file staff report re V.A.L. Circuits That the staff report dated May 11, 1983, re V.A.L. Circuits' application for Industrial Waste Discharge Permit and recommending issuance of a permit through June 30, 1983 be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 The Chair recognized Mr. Richard Durksee Authorize issuance of Class I of Custom Systems, Inc. , who addressed Permit to V.A.L. Circuits the Board concerning installation of pretreatment equipment by such firms as V.A.L. Circuits to aid in complying with discharge requirements. l� -21- 5/11/83 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That issuance of Class I Industrial waste Discharge Permit to V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. , for the period May 12 through June 30, 1983, be, and is hereby authorized. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 6 The Assistant General Manager briefed Verbal status report re implemen- the Directors on the progress made by tation of proposed user fee the staff to date on implementation of program the user fee program for the 1983-84 fiscal year. After reviewing the proposed fees with the Directors, Mr. Sylvester advised them that the fee schedule would be reviewed annually and a determination made each fiscal year with regard to that year' s fees needed to finance the District' s activities. Mr. Sylvester informed the Directors that the joint notice, to be published by District 6 in conjunction with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, is scheduled to be mailed to every property owner in both districts on May 23. He explained the return post card feature of the mailer, and also discussed the telephone response procedures to be used by the staff to answer inquiries from the property owners. Mr. Sylvester discussed the staff's efforts to inform the public of the proposed fees, including publishing of advertisements in the Daily Pilot and the Costa Mesa News, press releases to the local and regional newspapers, and the scheduled public workshops and public hearing. The Directors then entered into a general discussion of the charges, including the basis of the charges for the different classes of users. Mr Sylvester pointed out that major dischargers such as industries, hotels and large commercial buildings that hold industrial waste permits and pay sewer use fees under the provisions of the existing industrial waste ordinance, would receive credit for this sewer use fee which will be collected via their 1983-84 property tax bill. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fixing time and place for public hearing for review of reports and That June 9, 1983, 7:30 p.m. , Costa Mesa establishment of sewer service City Hall Council Chambers, be, and is charges for the 1983-84 fiscal hereby established as the date, time and year place for a public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 607, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges �.d -22- 5/11/83 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:38 p.m. , May 11, li,J 1983. Secretary, BoaWof Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -23- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE I % - ------- - REPORT NUMBER APAA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063347 .. ___A-1_NURSERIE.S LANO.S"P.I.NG--SURRL 063348 ACCU - SLUDGE i 1166.60 SAMPLERS 063349 A.T.R.• SALES• INC. $40.39 PIPE SUPPLIES y 063350 ACTION_INSTRUMENTS,_INC. ____ S671.12 -ELEC_TR.I.CA.L-SUP-PL-I. 063351 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS9 INC. S20.105.23 CONTRACTOR 5-12-2 063352. AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALS• INC. $3,915.76 PLANT 12 GENERATOR START-UP 063353 __.-.._.&MER.ICAN.-DIGIIAL_..SYS_TEtiS.>INC­ =1LsAIA.67 FLOW-NDNLJ-0RJ 063354 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $19229939 LAB SUPPLIES 'A� 1 ;. 063355 ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES S19.61 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 06335E THE-ANCHOR _PACKING CO.. :_ -i1.Z8.5.0.9 ENG1-NE�A 063357 AQUA BEN CORP. 1 $13;550.31 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS "I 063358 ATLAS RADIATOR SERVICE 858.84 TRUCK PARTS 063359. -.._ .._-._._BAKER._FLY WOO ILGQ...-1NL.. _--.232-:)7 SMALL _HARD-WA-R � tj 063360 BANK OF AMERICA NT 8 SA $36.46 TRAVEL EXPENSES, VARIOUS' AEETINhS 063361 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $125.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ,.} � ` -,•>� ]C 063362 .A.M. BEST.. COMP11N1_._.-.-_--------_-------_-_--.--._._----.S_4.2..9B- PUBLJ_CA.LI-O.N •• � w 063363 BEVCO $748.68 ELECTRIC CART PARTS ; H 063364 BLAKE. MOFFITT B TOWN[ S2.989.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES y 06336-9 ._.. ._._---PATRICIA-DA.VIS-flO.G-GAN - 172-O." - '• '063366 BROWNELL ELECTRO• INC. $96.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063367 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. i2499966.40 CONTRACTOR 11-13-3 'r c: I 063368 ..__-_BUTLER NATLONAL._CORP_.__-_-- -•--_-_.__i232.b6 PJ�E-SUP.L'LlES- '�'rt�s '• . �' F- 063369 BUTTERWORTH (PUBLISHERS) INC. - $57.71 TECHNICAL JOURNALS •'I 063370 C R R RECONDITIONING CO. $19205.00 PUMP REPAIRS • --_063371 ________.CHAMDER_MIX-CONCRET.E_.-LNL.. .-1665_.53 BWLIILN6--iA7E_tA 063372 CHEVRON U.S.A-• INC. $19062.12 GASOLINE 063373 CLARKES WATERPROOFING 5100.00 CSDOC 16 MANHOLE REPAIRS Y '1j }y 063374 CONANT.CONTROLS r_..INC $592..-71. VALVES-__ 063379 CONNLLL CHEVROLET S683.42 TRUCK PARTS 06337E CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S39079.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063377._ . _ _CONTINENTAL_CHEMICAL.-CO-_- 19.3fiAa4 CHLO".L 063378 CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO. S2.314.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES l: 063379 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES i2r352.92 ENGINE PARTS ;�` k1 �'�� 063380 MR. CRANE ... ._... PMEN"ENTAL '` � '� '' •' 06L381 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $43.37 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 063362 CULLIGAN DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE i21.70 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 063383 __._ __ LARRY__.CUR.TI_TRUCK-g_.E_OUIP_MENT__..._._- __ ..____519-19b.00-__- .EQUI-RMENT­RENTAL 063384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S95.00 ANNEXATION FEE PROCESSING 063385 DAILY PILOT $39.06 LEGAL ADVERTISING 063386 DANIEL INDUSTRIES I1t630.3.7_____.__-_CON3ROL_EQU1P_MENT_ i 063387 DECO 1354.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0633814 DELPHI SYSTEMS9 INC. $2,955.09 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES, COMPUTER PROGRAMS 0633H9 _ ._ DIESEL CONTROL_CORD __._____.... _...._.__._._-.___ _.-.,._._.._-.._.S149..54__ T.RUCK-PART-S- 063390 DORADO ENTERPRISES• INC. $21540.00 DIGESTER REPAIRS 063391 DRAKE'S GRADING 8 TOPSOIL $159.00 SAND 063392 DRIVER TESTING CENTER _S19.00 _ .._.___ _._._DRIVER_EXAMS t FUND NO 9194 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 2 ' _ ........... _ _-__._-__._ _�`. --.-----------_-___.__.._�-__.REP-QR�-NUMBER_AP-43----_.__.-_.....__ __.___---- ---- --- -•4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063393 _.__ .. ___EASTMANO._1NC...__--- ---.-- - ---------. -- Z765.88--_.. __.._-OFFICE--SUPPLIES---.----- 063394 ENCHANTER. INC. S315OO.00 OCEAN MONITORING 063395 FMC CORP. $805.60 PUMP PARTS 063396 FISCHER.&._P.ORTER_CO.------_-----.----.-------- --.- -. S3s379..2.3------.-.------PIPE--SUPPLIES 063397 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $667.17 LAB SUPPLIES 0633914 FLO-SYSTEMS $326.80 PIPE SUPPLIES C63399 __ _. . .__.__..C._M._FLORES-RENT.AL-S -_----.--_.._._._.--.-__-__,Z1o4.25.DQ._ MANHOLE-REPAIRS - ------ -- --- - "� 06340C FOOTHILL ENGINE & EQUIPMENT CO S786.52 ENGINE PARTS 063401 FOOTHILL GARDEN EQUIPMENT 1108.95 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES " 063402 THE- FOXBORO COMPANY ____ __ iZ1.241.52___..___-__-PUMP-PARTS ; I 063403 CRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT Z816.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS 063404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $19364.22 LUMBER 063405 ._.... .. GENERAL.TELEPHONE_C0..-------_----_--•--_-._.__.__.Z483.06-- -.-...TELEPHONE-- ----_.--------- 063406 M.E. GRAY CO. $470.88 PIPE SUPPLIES 063407 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO- $50.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063408 DUN GREEK & ASSOCIATES--._.__ _ _. . _ A2-089.00__-.--- ------ SURVEY-.-LL-_I3-3 -- --- ---- - ix 663409 HACH COMPANY $230.18 LAB SUPPLIES 06-3410 LARRY HALLOS $89.57 TRUCK REPAIRS IH 063411 __-__-..HALSTED-&_ HOGGAN*_INC- - _ __-_-._�r.E1-1..99 FLEC-TRICAL-SUP-PLIES--- ----.-... ___.-_.....___.___-.- " !y 063412 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $89.34 PIPE SUPPLIES 063413 HOAGLAND-ARTUKOVICH• J.V. $51.789.00 CONTRACTOR P2-25-IA (0y 063414 HOUSE-OF _BATTERIES - - -------._-__...__-__._--------••---_ _59.16_--__•-- BATTERIES_-__._._- -- -..__._-•---- . -_-._ _------ . .. ---__--- ' JI 063415 HOWARD SUPPLY CO. 1107.74 PIPE SUPPLIES IN 063416 CIIY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.44 WATER USEAGE 063417._. _.. . -_.._ _HUNTING.TON-.SUPPLT___ 0634111, IDEAL AEROSMITH+ INC. ,3147.71 VALVES 063419 INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE Z9.010.30 CONTRACTOR PW-094 063420 INGRAM PAPER _..- _ $44.29 - -OFFICE SUPPLIES - 06!421 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $29023.70 LAB SUPPLIES � I 0634?2 KAMAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY 1660.93 BEARING SUPPLIES " � 063423 KIMMERLE BROS.O 1NC. _.. __._ _. _....._. . 898.98_.----- - JANITORIAL -SUPPLIES -- -- ., 063424 KING BEARING• INC. $362.77 BEARING SUPPLIES 063425 KIRST PUMP & MACHINE WORKS $53.37 PUMP PARTS 063126 KOHL'S HALLMARK CENTER $291.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 063427 L.P.W.S.O INC. $257.30 WELDING SUPPLIES 0E342P LAKE FOREST ELECTRIC VEHICLES $315.18 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 063429 LIFECOM-SAFETY .SERVICE_ SUPFLY ..___ .. .Z221.05.__..______ SAFETY- SUPPLIES - - - --- - - - - - - -- -- 063430 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS• INC. $19.14 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I" 063431 LOS ANGELES CHEMICAL CO. $310.37 SOLVENTS � i 063432 LOWRY 9 ASSOCIATES $169995.43 CSOOC #13 FORMATION -- ----_ C63433 MATT - CHLUR• INC- $610.76 PIPE SUPPLIES i 0F3434 MCMASTER-CARE. SUPPLY CO. $513.05 SMALL HARDWARE 063135 MILO EQUIPMENT CORP. ___. .. $154.80 .._. ........ TRUCK PARTS - - - - " 063436 MODERN ALLOYS' INC. $1.562.51 PIPE SUPPLIES G63437 J. ARTHUR MOORE• CA# INC. +6199.80 VALVES 06.1439 E.U. MORITZ FOUNDRY Z2s157.10 MANHOLE RING 6 COVERS i I "I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 3 r --REPSR.T Nlll1BER_AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ~ ; CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 lrt• . WARRANT 140. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063439 ___ .__MOT1 ON- INDUSTRIES s_1NC-- S1_s626.04 WRE---URRL-1"E5- 063440 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION S34.00 PUBLICATIONS `; 06'441 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $214.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES • 063442 _ CITY._OF_NEWPORT_ BEACH-__-_.- -_-. -_._ ._--____..._-S"5.00 WA-T-E-R-USEAG "' `"" '• 063443 O.T.S. DISTRIBUTORS S312.70 TOOLS 063444 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. S110.65 VALVES 063445 _. .._____OXYGEN_.SERYICC--_- -a.9-0.26 WEL.DJ-NG-SUMP-1.4-E 063446 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR $16*290.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES 063417 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY S11s207.87 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND � ''r•"� 06344P PPG. INOUSTRIESs INC, _ - -" S1,lI4.Do___ PAINT-SUPP_L-1-E - - - 06z44`.' PACIFIC TELEPHONE $121.60 TELEMETERING 06345P PAC-WELD $111.48 WELDING SUPPLIES ••�- "i 063451 _. MR.._&-_MRS._.WILLIAM__0-. EA.S.SD_- ______1-9UIl.UO,14AB-1-L-ITY CLA-IM-SE_T-T4 &-M€IN 063452 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS, INC. $418.22 PUMP PARTS t; 063453 PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER $30.05 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS Ix 063454 _- PETRO_LEWIS. CORP•--------.-- ..._------------....... .__-_1621.95.--. _US.E_J:HARGE OVERPAY-MEN 063455 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS S357.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I� 06345E PITNEY BOWES t28.34 POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES 'iH 063457 ._ __._._._ PLAOEN.TIA__TRUC.K._.WRE_CIUNG_ _S_7-9.511 ?RUCK-PARTS " �H OE3458 POSTMASTER $19400.00 POSTAGE 063455 R• J. W. CONSTRUCTION CO.s INC $319016.50 CONTRACTOR PW-085 * %� w� 063466 _RAFFERTY_ INTERNAiIOr�AL_IBUEKS ___-_ __--.-.-.__._____$268..36 TRUCK-P-ARTS- t ,I I- 063461 RURERTSHAW CONTROLS CO. $384.97 CONTROL EQUIPMENT w 063462 PEGGY RODEMAKER S82.00 OFFICE MACHINES »C 063463 .-. _ ROSEMOUNTs-INC.-_ -- _-_-___S31-8.1:5 t-0N�ROL.-�@1L1 1&TJ- 063464 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $247.51 WIRE ` { ''•�l11 ` 4 063465 JOSEPH T. RYERSON 6 SON, INC. $170.00 STEEL STOCK 't 4� • 063466 SANCON INC. ._..._ ____--__ _S49B75.00__-_--MANHOLE-REPAIRS 063467 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $696.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0634A8 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $29995.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS 063469 SAP.GENT-.WELCH SCIENT_IF..IC__CO._-_---_ _LAB-SURRLIE-S 06'470 SIIAMROCK SUPPLY $486.28 TOOLS r. 063471 SHEPHARD MACHINERY CO. $916.36 TRUCK PARTS •' e .. .: .. 063472 SMART 8 FINAL IRIS CO. . . _ _._ _._._ ..__._ $34.32.-_____ JANITORIAL--SUP-PLIES 063473 A. F. SMITH B SONS CONST. CO. S179726.56 CONTRACTOR P1-19-2 063474 SMITH-EMERY CO. $49009.25 TESTING 11-13-3 ••� 063175 SU._CALIF. COASTAL-WATER-.RESEARCH-PRQJ.E.C.T__ S12s340._00 DEEP--OCEAN-SLUDGE-D4SROSAL-STUD 063476 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $182,422.50 POWER � 063477 S0. CALIF. WATER CO. S18.44 WATER USEAGE ' 06347it SOUTHERN COUNTIES _OIL, CO._,_. 063479 SPECIALTY PRODUCTS DISTR. CO. $29465.35 PAINT SUPPLIES ' ns3gy0 STAROW STEEL $260.25 STEEL STOCK 0634R1 SCOTT_STEVENS -_460.00__.-_.____-EMPLOYEE-III LEAGE- C63482 GAPY G. STREED $119004.64 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAY-OFF 063493 THE SUPPLIERS 1134.56 SMALL HARDWARE 0634R4 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER $19666.14 -_ PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT.------- . L ` w . . i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 063485 TPC_ TRAINING _SYSTEMS._._--__... .. .__.. _. .. .......-._. _._..._ %283.36.__.__.-___._.-..TECHNI CAL-JOURNALS• •-•-- .___, . .. __. .__-._._._._ 063186 TAYLOR INSTRUMENTS $150.16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063487 TECH/AID $798.00 TEMPORARY HELP 063g88 ARTHUR H.. THOMAS .CO... . _ . -_ $62.68 ._. . ._._. PI PE_SUPPLIES 063489 F.M. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING $1,340.12 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 063490 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $988.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 063491 _____.THOR-TEMPORARY_SERV.LCE.S—_—__—.--_— _—_-_--.-.-__.s7B6..50___.—_ ---TEMPORARY--.HELP------.-----------_ - ----. 063492 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE• INC- $19250.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES C63493 TRANSAMERICA OELEVALs INC. $19039.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES '• iI' 063494 TRAVEL RUFFS $268.00 _..AIRFARE, VARIOUS- MEETINGS - -• --•-- " 063495 TROJAN BATTERIES S581.11 TRUCK BATTERIES 063496 TRUCK R AUTO SUPPLY• INC. $49814.78 TRUCK PARTS = 063497 T U B E S A L E S E483.58_ _______.TUBING 06349f+ J.G. TUCKER 8 SON9 INC. $554.89 - _ 063499 U.S. DIVERS COMPANY S440.69 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES H LAB REPAIRS 06350C ULTRASYSTEMS9 INC. 5543.00 ENVI ROMENTAL- REPORT._._....- _ . _ _._..._.. ' w 063501 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 532.73 ' DELIVERY SERVILE I11 363502 UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO.• I NC. $112.82 COMPRESSOR PARTS 'y 063503 VWR SCIENTIFIC. ..___. .-E640.98 LAB-SUPPLIES-----.__...._.____—__. .. _. ._ _... ..___._. . - _.._ 063504 VALLEY CITIES SUPFLY CO. $724.21 PIPE SUPPLIES ' II 063505 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC $833.48 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063506 VALVE 8 STEEL SUPPLY- CO.. E327.54._-_ _. ____ VALVES --- --- - - ------- � ' 063507 VAUGHANOS INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO $29500.62 BEARINGS i 06350t' VOID MACHINE $1,350.00 PUMP PARTS 06350° WARREN- 8 DAILEY _....__._�__._ _._.—____....______..._ _ ._._. _.. .. 3396.35..-._._—______p.IPE--SUPPLIES--___.__..._. _......._.-.__ 063510 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $19589.86 ENGINE PARTS 063511 WAX SHOP $205.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 063512 WESTERN ELECTRONIC SUPPLY CORP - S148.40. _ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES - - i � 06,3513 WESTERN TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES $49611.00 SCRUBBER REPAIRS 063514 WESTERN WIPE 8 ALLOYS $124.02 WELDING SUPPLIES $400.24. ..... _.-_. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _- •- 06351°• WYLE OISTRIDUTIONS.GROUP._. .. .._.__ .. ._ ... ... I � 0E3511 XEROX CORP. $182.85 XEROX REPRODUCTION GF3517 Y - TIRE $19754.04 TRUCK TIRES I. � 063E18 YEARY AND ASSOCIATES $70q.62 PUMP PARTS „i ----------------- _. TOTAL. CLAIMS. PAID 04/06/83__- __ 1807,122.46 I, f FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL— — PROCESSING DATE 3/31/83 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY S.AN__ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/06/8-3 SUMMARY ;AMOUNT i #2 OPER FUND $. 556_42___ 92 ACO FUND 1 ,557.09 93 OPER FUND 1 .536. 19 I 95 OPER FUND i 1 ,246.47 -- ------ - ._....._..._ . . _. _.. . ; i 95 ACO FUND 20.105.23 f d6 OPER FUND 158.74 ( _ 97 OPER FUND 7,lf95.7¢---- �� 91 ACO FUND ------ - -- 735.48 911 OPER FUND 715.07 x N 1 1 ACO FUND _ ..... _. - - - 250,064.65 ---- IIH 913 ACO FUND 16.995.43 95E6 OPER FUND 2,368.22 H N667 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND --- ------ 283,364.70 ' CORF 148.6-48.61 N SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND_ _ __ ___ __ _______ _.400.00_ — _-_.--___._ _ _____ ___ -_ --_____..-___-_ ____.•___ ___ . __._. ___.___ SELF FUNDED 410RKER5' CORP. INSURANCE FUND _ 11 ,207.87 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 48,899.41 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/06/83 $807. 122.46 — i jl i FUND NO 91Q9 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/83 PAGE 1 (3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 a -' ---- -' - -- -COUNTY SANITATION-OTSTRICTS--OF ORANGE-COUNTY--- CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 (" WARRANT NO: VENDOR AMOUNT - - -- --"-^-- '--DESCRIPTTU 06353E A-1 NURSERIES $21.94 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 063537 --' A:W:C: CALIFORNIA— r 063530 ACTION INSTRUMENTS- INC. $219.93 DIGITAL INDICATOR 063539 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS- INC. $11346.50 RETENTION P2-23-6-R1 P63540 AIR CALIFORNIA __ .__.._ ----- - _ --g158:00_.__ ---._SIR FARE,-VAR-ID17"E-E TINGS 063541 AMERICAN DIGITAL SYSTEMS/INC• i1.416.67 FLOW MONITORING 063542 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS i224.91 LAB SUPPLIES 063543 -- ----MARCIA -AMES - ------------ -- - -------- %I5:00 EHPC-OYEE-HILEAL E '• OE3544 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $19352.30 PUMP PARTS ;; (r 063545 AQUA BEN CORP. S131644.45 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 063546 AQUATIC CENTER '$24:00 - -T CAB- SPECIHEA 063547 ARGENTS AIR EXPRESS 592.40 FREIGHT 0635411 ARROW TRUCK BODIES 8 EOUIPMFNT $19727.84 TRUCK PARTS 06.ZE49_ _ ._ N:A- 8 0; FRANK ARTUKOVICH_JV - - -- -"S796-.0O'- -CSOOC A6 MA-NHOLF-"PAI RSs ;,„ tr��r ,• ?..:,• 063550 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.• INC $358.28 BUILDING MATERIALS F" 063551 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY- INC. $19145.45 SMALL HARDWARE x C63552 BAKER PLYWOOD CO.o INC; - - S247:95 ' " "-"--LUMBER - ,•H 063553 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. $126.67 PUBLICATIONS '• j H 063554 BANK OF AMERICA NT 8 SA $176.37 TRAVEL EXPENSES 063555 ---DECKMAN INSTRUMENTS---- -------- ----- - S289:-37 ELECTRFCAL-SUPpCI .,'•,. .. bn 063556 9EVCO $151.58 SMALL HARDWARE I 063557 BIG BOX RENTAL CO. $19056.00 TRASH DISPOSAL ►' OF3558 " BLUE SEAL LINEN SUPPLY --- - - I100:00-.._____---TOWEL RENTAL 0635F9 SOBIS AIR CONDITIONING $258.36 TRUCK REPAIRS 063560 PATRICIA DAVIS DOGGAN $840.00 P2-23-6 DRAFTING 063561 BRENTWOOD PRODUCTS-_-____._ C63562 BUTTER ENGINEERING• INC. $289308.60 CONSTRi MANAGEMENT'•P2-23-61 'P2-23-6 UAW REdl�1� 663563 CK PUMP AND DEWATERING CORP. $2,500.00 DIGESTER REPAIRS 063564 CPT CALIFORNIA; INC: I12:215.33 - - -- -WORD PROCESS ING--EAU-IPHF-HT 063565 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH- INC- $117.98 LAB SUPPLIES 663�66 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.I INC. $39.15 DESCALER 063567 CAL-WEST INDUSTRIES V - 5445.20 -JANITOR--Al- SUP-F= 063568 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF S201588.31 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 063569 CARMENITA FORD TRUCK SALES* INC. $242.59 TRUCK PARTS 063579 JOHN CAP OLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN $39468.32 - - CONSTR P2=23, START_UP�2-23- 063e71 CARUS CHEMICAL CO.* INC. $39214.77 FEEDER RENTAL ;;I 06357' CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $39104.04 ENGINE OIL 063573- CLARK "DYE HARDWARE - _..__ _-- -.__ _. ___ S107:1D__ ___SMALL HARDWARE •• 063574 COLITE INDUSTRIES- INC. $35.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES ::c* 063575 COMPUTER AUTOMATION $19184.59 INDUSTRIAL WASTE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT' 06357E CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S875:77 - ELECTRICAL--SUPPEfES-� 063577 CONSOLIDATED REPPOLUCTIONS 111029.65 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION (16357A CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $131810.74 CHLORINE 06357') COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $178.32 -ENr;INE PARTS •• r; C635LP CORMIER-OELILLO CHEVROLET $21.33 TRUCK PARTS Li 063581 COSTA MESA AUTO PARTS/ INC. 5363.93 TRUCK PARTS l a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/83 PAGE 2 I REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' -_.-. .._._._ --•-.--.---•-•---_._--- - OUNTT-SANTTATTDN-DTSTRZCTS-OF`-OKAN6E-C , CLAIMS PAID 44/20/83 - - WARRANT NO: ----- ._- - -------VENDOR AMOU'dT-- - ES-CRT-PTT ury li 063582 CULLIGAN DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE I 5163.30 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ---063583 T STATE-OF--CACIFOWNI-A -- - { $35.uu ANNEXATION PROCESSING F E E.063584 DANIEL INDUSTRIES $106.61 ,.�. ; i" Y .rs,t qx� e ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �;( 063585 OELCO SALES S473.05 ENGINE PARTS 0635P.6 -DELPHI-SYSTEMS9 INC:-- -----_-_ __.----__---S32:"5 PUTTTF3UPP6AT-M v I C E S ,• 063587 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. $89520.50 SLUDGE GRINDER X 063588 OOLLINGER CORP. $29011.22 COMPRESSOR PARTS C63589 ` `--- DUNN-'EDiIARDS-CORP. -- Tq�tbB�-PJ�"�{'�Qls r•,5 yxr • • 063596 DYNATRON ELECTRIC CO., INC. $500.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES a •( tj, �•� s; 063591 ETMCO PROCESS EQUIP. CO. 5711.6E PIPE SUPPLIES 063592 EASTMAN,- INC: ----- -- -- - "- - S1i295.83 - DFFTCE---�UPPTT .f 063593 GAIL LYNN ELIZARRARAS E4*500.OD LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT 063594 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. $56.73 PIPE SUPPLIES tl 063595--_....___ ENYiRONMENTAC-RESOURCE--WSSOC. -58T:5 u IWA31TWUTIFSOBSCRIPTION ,. 063596 FMC CORP. $19802.00 PUMP PARTS 063597 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S23.50 FREIGHT .. 063598- F I SCHER & PORTER-CO:-- 063599 FISHER CONTROLS S17.64 CONTROL EQUIPMNET ; ( 063600 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $176.98 LAD SUPPLIES f. ___..063601- - -------FLAT_-6"-VERTI CAL-CONCRETE-----'-- - 225: ,f J 063E02 C. M. FLORES RENTALS $39529.70 PAVING SERVICES . '�j '� y,J X G63603 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY, INC. S26.00 LAB SUPPLIES 063604 - -- CITY OF FULLERTON---------"- - 063605 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $69598:75 TELEPHONE P6'-606 M.E. GRAY CO. S991.86 PIPE SUPPLIES .. - --063607 -ASSOCTATE'S- D 7 6-;Uu SURVEY - - • 063ED6 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. $31.02 HOSE �'G�'�� trl�` ` ' •• 063609 HARTGE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. $149343.75 ENGR. 1-2R-1 063610 - THE HEAD STOP -- - - --" --- E1i459:91'----"-VALVE�DP1sLTE5� 063611 MICHAEL HEINZ 320.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ;( 0E3612 E.G. HELLERtS SON* INC. $103.73 TOOLS 063613 - -- HERTZ-CAR LEASING LE RE 363614 HIL119 INC. E459.51 TOOLS 063615 HOLCHEM, INC. $29780.00 CAUSTIC SODA 063616 HOUSE OF DATTERIES" --" f7B1:52 " -'- BAttER1E3 '• 063E17 R.S. HUGHES CO., INC. $695:20 PAINT SUPPLIES 06361N CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SI0.62 WATER USEAGE .. 06361?- - HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER'"STAMP -'-------- -- `-%a7_.72i-_aFTICE SUM IS 063620 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $86.14 SMALL HARDWARE C63621 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT f $3.20 WATER USEAGE 063622 - BRYON JACKSON PUMP DIVISION 680:47 --""--' PUMP-PARTS-` 063623 KAMAN BLARINGS G SUPPLY 319694.65 BEARING SUPPLIES 063624 KAS SAFETY PRonUCTS $449.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 063625 - KELLY BLUE BOOK _.-------_-_ _. - - ---i36:U0 ---PUBLT�ATT�Ff •• 063626 KING BEARING* INC. 149673.37 BEARING SUPPLIES ; ( 063627 L & N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO $39556.45 UNIFORM RENTAL • ,l FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/83 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ ._.. - ._........ ........._..----._-"" '- " ` -"---'"- COUNTY SANITATION'OISTR ICTS�•OF'"ORANGE- COUNTY --- ---- -�' CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 WARRANT N0: VENDOR AMOUNT -3---SCRIPTI0N -------..------... -.----___--- 063628 L.B.W.S.. INC. $194.82___ WELDING SUPPLIES___-- 063629 " '-'--'-'"'CARRY S-"BL'OG.-MATERIAL-S INC. 129.31 - BUI LDING MATERIALS 063630 LAURSEN COLOR LAD $153.71 FILM PROCESSING 063631 LAWSON PRODUCTS* INC. $122.76 T RUCK_PARTS 063632 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO.' '" "" - """" " 4207.46 ' --- ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063633 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $26.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES „ 063634 K.P. LINDSTROM 8 lSSOCIATES $39739.15 EIR - OCEAN WAIVER RESPONSE --_-„_____. ..•..__ I 063635 .. _...COS ANGELES -CHEMICL ;A Cu •---- --- -- - ...-_._. . 5985:80--- C63636 MACK TRUCKSt INC. $346.39 TRUCK PARTS C63637 MATT - COLOR♦ INC. $26.63 PIPE SUPPLIES i • 053638 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $979.29 - _-._.._. -. ...__...___- --. _----_--___..... __... __.____ .".. " SNAI! HARDWARE „I 063639 MED-TOX ASSOCIATES♦ INC. $19127.75 RETENTION PW-095 C63640 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $6.00 WATER USEAGE [rJ. . 063641 METER- MASTER i- INC; ---- --..-- - --- ---._..... .... . .. ..�177:5$ ---._ _. .__.._.._ _---- -- -.. ..--•-•.__.. CALIBRATION TESTING I� 063642 MILO EQUIPMENT CORP. $36.55 TRUCK PARTS „ H 063643 MONITEK9 INC. $19370.60 ENGINE PARTS 063644 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. ____..----------_------------ -_.._._.... 52�163.48 ' SMALL HARDWARE .I „H 063645 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS CO. $906.69 TRUCK PARTS 06364E OXYGEN SERVICE $116.70 SPECIALTY GASES -- 063697 '"•'• " •'""--COUNTY•-SANI TAT TON-U'ISTRZ CTS-OF-ORANGE"COUNTT $IiD3D:02-- WORKERS' COMP. FUND 1 06364E PARTS UNLIMITED S2s068.21 TRUCK PARTS „w 063649 PEAT♦ MARWICK9 MITCHELL B CO. $776.00 ANNUAL AUDIT EXAMINATION 06:650 PENNWALT CORP: - - --._.. - - _ _.-. ._. =38:C5-- -- FREIGHT 063651 PERMA-CAL CORPORATION $1.104.'►0 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 063652 PITNEY BOWES $84.27 POSTAGE METER RENTAL ,. 063653 --- ""-PORTER BOICf.R SERVICE+'-TNC:` -"__-._..__._.._.._.__._.__.-._ _. 14I0:99•- .• 063654 POSTMASTER 1530.00 BOILER REPAIRS POSTAGE 063655 IIAPOLD PRIMROSE ICE $27.00 '• _ INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE __ ___ , -._ - '•. 063656 RAFFERTY INIERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1146.85 TRUCK PARTS G63657 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. S25R.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 063658 RE-CY-KLEEN CORP. $421.77 TRUCK REPAIRS_ 063659 - THE REGISTER - i69�:64 ^--- - CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 063660 REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. $986.69 STEEL STOCK ' 0636f-1 ROACHWATER TECIINOLOGY• INC. $892.04 VALVES 063662 RUPE RESOURCES $19.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 063663 JOSEPH T. RYERSON 8 SON• INC- $332.69 STEEL STOCK G63664 SANCON INC. S335.00 CSOOC #7 MANHOLE REPAIRS -- 063665 SAND-DOLLAR -BUSINESS FORMS--- - - - 5353.51 - OFFICE FORMS � _ . 063666 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $19197.42 ELECTRIC ROTOR PARTS 06'667 SARGENT-WELCII SCIENTIFIC CO. $22.83 LAB SUPPLIES 063660 SEARS4 ROEBUCK 9 CO: - T478.49*" C63669 SMALLER & LOUR, INC. $2,917.00 ENGR- 5-12-2, 5-18R, 5E6 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 06367( SHAMROCK SUPPLY $29334.42 .. TOOLS _-_--------- --- .__ 063671 A.II: SHIFKEYi INC: $871.26 TRUCK TIRES 063672 SLUDGE s112.20 TECHNICAL JOURNAL 063673 SORTEBERG CONTROLS CORP. $19343.24 CONTROL EQUIPMENT r FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/83 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 �. ---•__--•--..... - ---.__...._---.._.._..__...------•-•-.--.- COUNT'SANT TATIUR-DISTRICTS-OF-`D"NGT_nUNTT• CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 � ( WARRANT N0: -.._._._.._ .. --- VENDOR-----'------"- _.'AM.OUNT ESCRTPT 063674 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT S126.19 ' c OFFICE MACHINES " 063675•"--—SOUTHER N-CAL IF;-EDISON-'CO.--- ----" --59S 4 71 POWER dr. 063676 S0. CAL. GAS CO. $46,94D.85 NATURAL GAS ", ( �. . . �. 063677 SOUTHWEST FLEXIBLE SEWER EQUIP $296.91 PIPE SUPPLIES S.,.'+,; 06367P SPARKLETTS -DRINKING WATER- 1655.78--'-___-_�IATEV6l3PENSER 063679 SPIRAL [BINDING CO.* INC. $228.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES C6368C THE SUPPLIERS $69291.04 _SMALL HARDWARE " 063681..------.-.._----j:HATNE"-STLVESTER- — - — - T1--793':Sl PEfiT��A3 F� •.., :.N «� �,_ .,. 063682 TAK TAKAMINE $5 DO:00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 063683 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP. $7000.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS C63684 THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES _$R80iO0-'-- -TENP_dRARV-REU 063685 TROJAN BATTERIES E325.82 TRUCK BATTERIES 363686 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY• INC. i19244.45 TRUCK PARTS .ErJ 063687 9320:40— TRIRCK P RTS f .. „D4 063688 J-G. TUCKER & SON• INC. $9594.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES „x 06368 9 U.S. RENTALS I S60.50 DRILL RENTAL 063690 UNION OIL- CO; OF CALIF:- H OF3691 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S28.64 DELIVERY SERVICE y 0636Q2 UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO., INC. S5.067.30 -- -063693 - -- -VWR SCIENTIFIC-- - -- -�'--' "'—`Ti535:2$ COMPRESSOR PARTS tlj A 063694 VAUGHAN*S INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO $941.40 1 TRUCK REPAIRS �y ��.. ,p 063695 THE WALDINGFR CORP. $69010.17 RETENTION ')-4-2-i ' ..`u�: �stiv';i0;I .. s 063696 - JOHN R: WAPLES..-. .. - _ - ---- - -... - -- --- - 33T2:20 — OoaR-tISN-SUETTRG .. 063697 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $53.31 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR "c 063698 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $448.33 ENGINE PARTS -'"063699 - -- ---pESTINGHOUSE--ELECTRTC CORP--_ ELUT-RTETE-TUPPLIES 063700 P. U. WHETSTONE & ASSOCIATES S963.00 COMPUTER PROGRAMMING C 063701 WHITE. FINE & VERVILLE $29015.45 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL. STU64 't G63702 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF "'` $299.22;------- ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS -PAID 04/20/83" -----. -i407t397:32--- •• c .c c 9199 , . - JT 01ST WORKING C11P.LTAL __, PROCESSING 04115/83GE 5 -_ '• REPORT NUHBER AP�13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , CLAIMS PAID 04/26/83 ......_._...._.__..__.____ SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND _.__.._�.._._ _..--------_--__ _ �._ 5-,100. 1 _ • h ACO FUND 7O N3 OPER FUND 12,346.75 N5 OPER FUND 1 �956.65 N5 ACo FUND 1 ,345.00� •' N6 OPER FUND 1 .759.00 i- d7 OPER FUND -- _ _. 3-,_A35,j_1 N1 ACO FUND 08. 3 N11 OPER FUND 5,268.35 #11 ACO FUND 6,976..00 a566 OPER FUND 1 ,067.1,0 H H566 ACO FUND 1 ,572.00 „ N667 OPER FUND 3 5,35- _0 UN > .. JT DPER FD 1ar,f4j CORF 113,633.08 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 4 553-31____ SELF FUNDED WORD W COMP. INSURANCE FUND 1 ,030.02 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 55,452.07 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/20/83 $407,391.32 44 w EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA hod A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , May 11, 1983, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m., May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m., May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:38 p.m. , May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , v.►� June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m., May 11, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 1, 1983. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m., May 11, 1983. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the llth day of May, 1983. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this llth day of May, 1983. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -2- EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY rrr� SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , May 11, 1983, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Chief of Procurement to attend the That the Chief of Procurement be, and is International Purchasing hereby, authorized to attend the 68th Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada Annual International Purchasing Conference on May 22-25, 1983, in Las Vegas, Nevada; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County . Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the llth day of May, 1983. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of June, 1983. fv ' Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 ad O� CEXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., May 11, 1983, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization-called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of membership in CCA That renewal of membership in the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) for the period of May 1, 1983, through April 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of annual dues in the amount of $8,000, be, and is hereby, approved. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the llth day of May, 1983. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of May, 1983. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11