Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983-02-09
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $ AREA CODE 714 S40-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. O. BOX a127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 2, 1983 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 21 3, 51 o, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 91 1983 . - 7;30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County ,Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6 , 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Sec/vary Scheduled f,'Qccmir_a Meeti,'rgs : JOINT MEETING OF: cpECIAIJ COLL�IIT EE TO 4STJDY) REORGANIZATION OF THE ) - Wednesday, February ytc at 5: 00 P.M. SANITATION DISTRICTS ) (immediately preceding the regular & } joint Board Meeting) FISCF,L POLICY COMMITTEE ) RECLAIMED WATER PRICING POLICY COMMITTEE - Thursday, Fenrsary 10th at 4 : 00 p.m. alt Tustin City Mail EYECLTIiTE COMMITTEE - Wednesday , February 23rd at 5. 30 n.m. ;'^en:a wive) N,.,* FiSCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Tuesday, Mach lst at 4: 30 p.m. (Tentative) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.0.20X 8'.27 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFCRNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (7 14)982.241 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings February Feb 9, 1983 Feb 23, 1983 March Mar 9, 1983 Mar 23, 1983 April Apr 13, 1983 Apr 27, 1983 May May 11, 1983 Mav 25, 1983 June Jun 8, 1983 Jun 22, 1983 July Jul 13, 1983 Jul 27, 1983 August Aug 10, 1983 None Scheduled September Sep, 14, 1983 Sep 28, 1983 October Oct 12, 1983 Oct 26, 1983 November Nov 9, 1983 Nov 23, 1983 December Dec 14, 1983 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1984 Jan 25, 1984 February Feb 8, 1984 Feb 22, 1984 a'1ais� '40ARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: ACode JOINT BOARDS 910 I 2-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 9, 1983 - 7:30 P .M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD, IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT / :00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items `r►' (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 January 12, 1983, regular District 2 - January 12, 1983, regular District 3 - January 12, 1983, regular District 5 - January 12, 1983, regular District 6 - January 12, 1983, regular and January 25, 1983, adjourned District 7 - January 12, 1983, regular and January 19, 1983, adjourned District 11 - January 12, 1983, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS \..� Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) "A" and "B" 1 12 83 1 26 83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $205,786.30 $251,810.09 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 323,978.50 184,149.38 Joint Working Capital Fund - 22,530.29 152,947.70 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,313.59 7,584.19 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 3,648.67 5,595.59 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 787.45 9,150.37 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 456.24 7,583.03 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 119.92 330.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 3,517.76 1,933.33 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 29,264.00 6,019.36 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 604.85 2,933.14 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,794.24 $598,801.81 $630,036.18 CONSMU CAEMqDAR ITEMS IZOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(r) (9) ALL DISTRICTS �..' All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- 2/9/83 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing execution of an agreement providing for the Districts' membership in the Underground Service Alert of Southern California, as required by Assembly Bill No. 3019, and authorizing payment of fees in accordance with the fee schedule contained in said agreement (estimated to be less than $100/month) (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, authorizing an addition of $21,982.00 to the contract with Hoagland-Artukovich, a Joint Venture, for rerouting of the digester cleaning line and a change in 'the pipe size in the floor drain system. See page "C" (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, authorizing an addition of $13,162.00 to the contract with L a H Construction, a Joint Venture, for soil removal and grading of catch basins, recompaction of specified areas and installation of temporary roadway. See page "D" (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend the International Conference on Thermal Conversion of Municipal Sludge sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency to be held in Hartford, Connecticut, on March 21-24, 1983; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member from the Operations Department to travel to the Autocon facility in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for a two-week training program beginning February 14, 1983, on the use of the computer installed as part of the Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-15, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with construction of Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, providing for an extension of the agreement from January 31 1983, to the date that said project is accepted as complete by the Board of Directors (estimated to be June, 1983) , with no increase in the total maximum authorized fee. See page "E" -3- 2/9/83 s (9) DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 1,� the northern half of 6 and 7, and authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement for said services DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, and authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement for said services DISTRICT 2 (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of the following projects: (a) Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station (b) Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to Santa Ana River Interceptor (c) Haster Trunk Sewer connecting the Newhope-Placentia Trunk to the Santa Ana River Interceptor (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-19-2, waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges See page "F" DISTRICT 3 (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated February 1, 1983, in connection with proposed revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-135 issued to Arnold Circuits. See page "G" DISTRICT 5 (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifications for Modifications to Pacific Coast Highway Force Main at Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-25, authorizing a deduction of $3,890.00 from the contract with C.R. Pump and Dewatering Corporation and granting a time extension of 78 calendar days due to delays in delivery of materials required. See page "H" (m) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , changing the date for receipt of bids from January 25 to February 22, 1983 -4- ! t 2/9/83 (9) DISTRICT 6 (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering tip.✓ services in connection with design of the Fairview-Gisler Trunk DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-20-7, waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 99 - Shapiro Annexation, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges See page "I" (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in connection with design of the following projects: (a) Airport Relief Trunk (b) South Irvine Lift Station DISTRICT 11 (q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, authorizing an addition of $21,712.29 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company for rerouting of a siphon to avoid 23 undisclosed oil utilities and for additional cleanouts on 14 new manholes, and granting at time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of additional work required. See page "J" (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-21-11, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with Smith-Emery Company for in-plant pipe testing services required in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, providing for additional testing services required and increasing the total compensation from an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $19,236.00. See page "K" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- 2/9/83 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-18, revising per diem compensation policy for employees on out-of-county assignments, and rescinding Resolution No. 80-50. See page "L" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file the General Counsel's Memorandum dated January 19, 1983, relative to procedures to implement new statutory provisions re campaign contributions, and approving procedures and forms recommended therein (c) Consideration of motion declaring intent to exempt local governmental entities from user fees when ad valorem taxes are utilized for payment of maintenance and operating costs, subject to modification by any District that determines a local unit of government is placing a significant demand on the Districts' sewerage system (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in closed session re personnel matters (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items considered in closed session (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification re final negotiated fee with Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job No. I-2R, and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099. (SEE SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA - Selection Committee to meet prior to Joint Board Meeting) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-16, approving agreement with Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job No. I-2R, and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, for a lump sum of $ (SEE SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA) (ITEM #16 CONTINUED ON PAGE 7) -6- 2/9/83 (16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (b) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to evaluate the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company in the amount of $7,289,957.70 in connection with Job No. P2-23-6. (SEE SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA - Selection Committee to meet prior to Joint Board Meeting) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-17, approving Addendum No. 6 to the Construction Management Services Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. re Job Nos. P2-23 & P2-24, providing for additional services to evaluate the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6, on a cost plus fixed-fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $ , (increases maximum total compensation from $1,597,225.00 to $ ) , and providing for an extension of the terms of said agreement from January 31, 1983, to June 30, 1983. (SEE SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA) (17) DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Consideration of motion approving policy relative to recordation of Notice of Encroachment and Violation of District Ordinance to protect Districts' interests pertaining to connected properties outside District boundaries, as recommended by the General Counsel (18) DISTRICT 2 ' Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any `✓ (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 11 'ft� Consideration of motion to adjourn -7- 2/9/83 " (28) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions re proposed Ordinance No. 605: See page "M" (a) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 605, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Amending Ordinance No. 604 Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, by title only, an waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) (b) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 605, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Amending Ordinance No. 604 Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and pass to second reading on March 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. (29) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 1 Public hearing on proposed revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 1-348 issued to V.A.L. Circuits on June 1, 1980: See page "N" (a) Open hearing (b) Report by General Counsel re hearing procedures that will be followed (c) Staff presentation of evidence (d) Oral presentation of evidence by V.A.L. Circuits (e) Rebuttal, if desired (f) Questions by Directors (g) Close hearing (h) Discussion by Directors (i) Consideration of action by motion of Directors adopting resolution of findings of fact and orders (32) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- BOARDS OF DIEtECTO:tS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Are9a6 -2411)4 540-2910 AGENDA MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 9, 1983 - 7 :30 P .M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT / : 00 P. M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items V � (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda DISTRICTS 2 6 3 �e following (5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the :d be so ordered City of Brea regarding appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) ITEMS ON District Active Director Alternate Director SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA 2 Sam Cooper :forma A. Hicks* 3 Carrey J. Nelson Sam Cooper District 5 - January 12, 1983, regular District 6 - January 12, 1983, regular and January 25, 1983, adjourned District 7 - January 12, 1983, regular and January 19, 1983, adjourned District 11 - January 12, 1983, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See `O" page(s) "A" and "B" POLL CALL VOTE,,,- 1/12 83 1 26 83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $205,786.30 $251,810.09 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 323,978.50 184,149.38 Joint Working Capital Fund - 22,530.29 152,947.70 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,313.59 7,584.19 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 3,648.67 5,595.59 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 787.45 9,150.37 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 456.24 7,583.03 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 119.92 330.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 3,517.76 1,933.33 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 29,264.00 6,019.36 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 604.85 2,933.14 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,794.24 --- $598,801.81 $630,036.18 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(r) `.d (9) ALL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on R- 'all Vote or cast the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. \,,,tnimous ballot -2- 2/9/83 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing execution of an agreement providing for the Districts' membership in the Underground Service Alert of Southern California, as required by Assembly Bill No. 3019, and authorizing payment of fees in accordance with the fee schedule contained in said agreement (estimated to be less than $100/month) (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, authorizing an addition of $21,982.00 to the contract with Hoagland-Artukovich, a Joint Venture, for rerouting of the digester cleaning line and a change in the pipe size in the floor drain system. See page "C" (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, authorizing an addition of $13,162.00 to the contract with L & H Construction, a Joint Venture, for soil removal and grading of catch basins, recompaction of specified areas and installation of temporary roadway. See page "D" (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend the International Conference on Thermal Conversion of Municipal Sludge sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency to be held in Hartford, Connecticut, on March 21-24, 1983; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to -designate one staff member from the Operations Department to travel to the Autocon facility in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for a two-week training program beginning February 14, 1983, on the use of the computer installed as part of the Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-15, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with construction of Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, providing for an extension of the agreement from January 31 1983, to the date that said project is accepted as complete by the Board of Directors (estimated to be June, 1983) , with no increase in the total maximum authorized fee. See page "E" -3- ' (9) DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 2/9/83 (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 1, the northern half of 6 and 7, and authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement for said services DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, and authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement for said services DISTRICT 2 (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of the following projects: (a) Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station (b) Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to Santa Ana River Interceptor (c) Haster Trunk Sewer connecting the Newhope-Placentia Trunk to the Santa Ana River Interceptor (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-19-2, waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges See page "F" DISTRICT 3 (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated February 1, 1983, in connection with proposed revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-135 issued to Arnold Circuits. See page "G" DISTRICT 5 (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifications for Modifications to Pacific Coast Highway Force Main at Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-25, authorizing a deduction of $3,890.00 from the contract with C.R. Pump and Dewatering Corporation and granting a time extension of 78 calendar days due to delays in delivery of materials required. See page "H" (m) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , changing the date for receipt of bids from January 25 to February 22, 1983 -4- 2/9/83 (9) DISTRICT 6 (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering �..: services in connection with design of the Fairview-Gisler Trunk DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-20-7, waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 99 - Shapiro Annexation, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges See page "I" (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in connection with design of the following projects: (a) Airport Relief Trunk (b) South Irvine Lift Station DISTRICT 11 (q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, authorizing an addition of $21,712.29 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company for rerouting of a siphon to avoid 23 undisclosed oil utilities and for additional cleanouts on 14 new manholes, and granting at time extension of 10 calendar \"`/ days for completion of additional work required. See page (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-21-11, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with Smith-Emery Company for in-plant pipe testing services required in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, providing for additional testing services required and increasing the total compensation from an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $19,236.00. See page "K" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- 2/9/83 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report `" (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: Roil Call Vcte or Cast (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-18, revising per diem compensation Unanimous Ballet policy for employees on out-of-county assignments, and rescinding Resolution No. 80-50. See page "L" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file the General Counsel's Memorandum dated January 19, 1983, relative to procedures to implement new statutory provisions re campaign contributions, and approving procedures and forms recommended therein (c) Consideration of motion declaring intent to exempt local governmental entities from user fees when ad valorem taxes are utilized for payment of maintenance and operating costs, subject to modification by any District that determines a local unit of government is placing a significant demand on the Districts' sewerage system (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in closed session re personnel matters (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session ( ' 1 : (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items considered in closed session (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: t�E!,as oN • (a) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Selection SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Committee's certification re final negotiated fee with Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job Nos. I-2R-1 (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) and I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099. See page "I" ITEMS OR SL'FPLElhENiAL AGENDA (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-16, approving agreement with A Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Roll Call Vote or Cast Fountain Valley, Job Nos. I-2R-1 (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) and Unanimous Ballot I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, for a lump sum of $63,750.00. See page "II" (Item #16 continued on page 7) -6- 2/9/83 (16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) oN (b) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee �;??LENic:vTA1 AGENDAcertification re final negotiated fee with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to analyze the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company in connection with Job No. P2-23-6. See page "III" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-17, approving Addendum No. 6 t,eMsON to the Construction Management Services Agreement with Butier y,o� EyT�AGENDA Engineering, Inc. re Job Nos. P2-23 & P2-24 , providing for additional services to analyze the claim of H. C. Smith Roll call vote or cast Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6, on a cost unanimous sailct plus fixed-fee basis, for an amount not to exceed W-A-""e $112,000.00, (increases maximum total compensation from $1,597,225.00 to $1,709,225.00) , and providing for an extension h > of the terms of said agreement from January 31, 1983, to �c September 30, 1983. See page "IV" tT�MSOS (c) Consideration of motion amending the Board action of November 10, 5,�,?�c�iL tTAL AG90 ' 1982, authorizing the staff to issue purchase orders, as required, for vacuum trucking of 1982-83 stormwater runoff at the Coyote Canyon sludge processing site, increasing the total amount from an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 (17) DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Consideration of motion approving policy relative to recordation of Notice of Encroachment and Violation of District Ordinance to protect Districts' interests pertaining to connected properties outside District boundaries, as recommended by the General Counsel (18) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 7 �/ fi l Consideration of motion to adjourn X -7- 2/9/83 ' (26) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions re proposed Ordinance No. 605: See page "M" Roll Cali Vote or Cast (a) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 605, An Ordinance of the Unanimous Ballot Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Amending Ordinance No. 604 Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous ~vote of Directors present) (b) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 605, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Amending Ordinance No. 604 Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and pass to second reading on March 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. (29) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 1 Public hearing on proposed revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit �.d No. 1-348- issued to V.A.L. Circuits on June 1, 1980: See page "N" Nr(a) Open hearing _ V (b) Report by General Counsel re hearing procedures that will be followed (c) Staff pr sentati n of evidence �O nnl� (d) Oral presentation of evidence by V.A.L. Circuits (e) Rebuttal, if desired r;l (�,�}(f) Questions by Directors (g) Close hearing 11 (h) Discussion by Directors (i) Consideration of action by motion of Directors adopting resolution of findings of fact and orders ��1c vT vc , !Pv u •� � G �- , 6- (32) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 1 �'I Consideration of motion to adjourn 1, i MA dAGER'S AGENDA RE?CRT Pose office scx 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue i of Orange County, California Fountain Vciley, Calif'., 92708 Televhwes: Area C_-ee 714 540- JOINT BOARDS 962-24101 Meeting Date February 9 , 1983 - 7: 30 p .m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important , non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting . To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager ' s Report , we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself , particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer ' s estimate . Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award .. Joint Boards No . 9-a - Authorizing Membership in Underground Service Alert . Assembly Bill No . 3019 requires every owner of underground facilities to become a member of a regional notification center which provides warnings of excavations or other work close to existing subsurface installations . The Bill takes effect July 1 , 1983 . The staff has investigated the available services and has determined that Underground Service Alert of Southern California is the only regional notification center . We estimate the cost to be less than $ 100 per month , comprised of a flat rate per hundred miles of sewers plus a fee for the number of calls received . In addition there will be our staff' s time for marking Districts ' facilities each time a call is received . The California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) is proposing to introduce "clean-up" legislation to amend this new law to make membership by severing agencies optional . Because member agencies ' sewers are so deep , the service is of limited benefit . However , staff is recommending membership at- this time in order to comply with the law. In the event the law is changed , we will reevaluate our participation in Underground Service Alert . x No . 9-b - Change Order No . 4 to Job No . P2-25-1A Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No . 2 (Basins ) . woe Change Order No . 4 covers two items of work and adds $21 , 982 to the contract . The major, item is for the immediate rerouting and replacement of the digester cleaning line at a cost of $19 , 892 . The second item is to increase the pipe size in the floor drain system in the primary sludge pump station and extend it to the sump at a cost of $2 , 090 . There is no time extension allowed with this change order . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 4 in the total amount of $21 , 982 . No . 9-c - Change Order No . 2 to Job No . PW-098 , Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No . 2. Change Order No . 2 adds four items totaling $13 , 162 to the contract . Included in the work is removal of 500 cubic yards of material , grading and setting of two catch basins , installation of a temporary road to the warehouse at Plant No . 2, backfill and recompaction of a trench , and excavation and recompaction of settlement adjacent to the chlorine influent plant water line . This additional work increases the contract amount to $181 , 400 . The original engineer ' s estimate for the work exclusive of this addition was $225 , 000 . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 2 in the amount of $ 13 , 162 . There is no time extension associated with this change order . No . 9-d - Authorization for One Staff Member to Attend International Conference on Thermal Conversion of Municipal Sludge . The Environmental Protection Agency is sponsoring a seminar on thermal conversion of municipal sludge March 21 -24 in Hartford , Connecticut . Subjects to be covered include a Report on Activities of the USEPA Sludge Management Task Force , Environmental Considerations , Residuals Handling Considerations , Operation and Management of Thermal Systems , an Overview of Codisposal Alternatives in Use and New Techniques , and various case studies . With a decision on the best alternative method of ultimate sludge disposal still facing the Districts , we feel that it is important to keep informed on the latest developments . Therefore , the staff is requesting approval to send one person to this conference and authorization for reimbursement of all associated expenses in accordance with established policy . -2- No . 9-e - Authority to Send One Staff Member to .� Minneapolis , Minnesota for Computer Training . The staff is requesting authority to send one member of the Operations Division staff to the Autocon Facility in Minneapolis , Minnesota for a two week training program on the Districts ' new computer , installed as part of the 75 MGD Improved Treatment Facilities at Plant No . 2 . This class , for which there is no fee , is only given once each year and provides the instruction necessary to program and operate the computer which will be used to monitor the new treatment facilities . At the present time only one staff member (trained in the engineering department to oversee the original installation ) is capable of writing programs for this equipment . The staff requests authority to enroll one person in the upcoming class which begins February 14 and authorization to pay all incidental expenses associated with the trip in accordance with established policy. No . 9-f - Addendum No . 2 to Agreement with Butier Engineering , Inc . for Services regarding Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No . 2 , Job No . P2-25-1A . • The item appearing on the agenda is a time extension for construction management services provided by Butier Engineering , Inc . for the P2-25-1A construction contract . The present construction management agreement expired January 31 , 1983 . When these services were originally contracted , it was anticipated that as the other major jobs at Plant No . 2 were completed , the Districts ' staff would be able to assume the administration of this contract during the final phases . However , because of other demands on our Engineering Department at this time , we are unable to do so , and it is recommended that Butier ' s services be retained . The addendum extends the service agreement to whatever date that Job No . P2-25-1A is accepted as complete by the Boards of Directors (now anticipated to be June 1983) . There are sufficient monies in the original agreement to cover the extension . The staff recommends approval of Addendum No . 2 to the contract with Butier Engineering , Inc . extending the time to a date consistent with final construction completion . Districts Nos . 1 , 6 , and 7 No . 9-g - .Authorize Staff to Solicit Proposals for Preparation of an EIR for the Updated and Consolidated Master Plans and Authorize the Selection Committee to Negotiate an Agreement for Said Work . At the December meeting , the Directors approved the recommendations contained in the updated and consolidated Master -3- Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos . 1 , northern half of 6 , and 7 . It is now recommended that proposals be solicited for the ..� preparation of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) covering all recommended projects in the Master Plans which will facilitate construction of the projects as they become budgeted . The staff requests that authority be given to solicit proposals for preparation of the EIR and for the Selection Committee to negotiate with a consultant for the work . When an agreement has been reached , the Selection Committee will submit its recommendation to the Boards for approval . Districts Nos . 2 , 3 , and 11 No . 9-h - Authorize Staff to Solicit Proposals for Preparation of an EIR for the Updated and Consolidated Master Plans and Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate an Agreement for Said Work . At the December meeting , the Directors approved the recommendations contained in the updated and consolidated Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos . 2 , 3 , and 11 . It is now recommended that proposals be solicited for the preparation of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR ) covering all recommended projects in the Master Plans which will facilitate construction of the projects as they become budgeted . The staff requests that authority be given to solicit proposals for preparation of the EIR and for the Selection Committee to negotiate with a consultant for the work . When an agreement has been reached , the Selection Committee will submit its recommendation to the Boards for approval . District No . 2 No . 9-i - Authorizing Selection Committee to Negotiate with Lowry and Associates for Design of Certain Master Plan Projects The action appearing on your agenda is to authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate fees for design of three of the recommended projects in the District ' s recently updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers . These are : a . Modifications to the Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station b . Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to the Santa Ana River Interceptor C . Haster Trunk Sewer Connecting the Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer to the Santa Ana River Interceptor The Modifications to the Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station are necessary to upgrade and enlarge the existing facility . The other two projects are necessary to relieve the overloaded Euclid -4- Trunk and the Newhope-Placentia Trunk System by diverting flows to the Santa Ana River Interceptor System. The staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a fee with Lowry and Associates for this work . When an agreement has been reached , the Committee will submit its recommendation to the Board for approval . No . 9-j - Waiving Property Tax Allocation regarding Annexation No . 43 - Forrester Annexation . Initiation of annexation proceedings for this one-half acre single family dwelling parcel in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim has previously been approved by the Board . The resolution appearing on the agenda is to waive any property tax exchange with other affected taxing agencies in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . Pursuant to said agreement , the District will receive a one-time $500 allocation from the County ' s Special District Augmentation Fund in lieu of a tax exchange for this property . Sta M recommends adoption of Resolution No . 83-19-2 . District No . 3 �. No . 9-k - Receive and File Staff Report re Proposed Revocation of Arnold Circuits Industrial Waste Permit . Included with your agenda material is a staff report concerning repeated violations of Industrial Waste Permit No . 3-135 conditions by Arnold Circuits . A staff level permit revocation meeting on this matter is scheduled with the permittee for February 10 . Because of the firm ' s inability to comply with permit requirements , the staff has every reason to believe that a recommendation will be forthcoming to the Board at its March meeting to set a permit revocation hearing for April 13th . District No . 5 No . 9-1 - Change Order No . 1 to Job No . 5-25 , Modifications to Pacific Coast Highway Force Mains at Bitter Point Pump Station . Change Order No . 1 deducts $3 ,890 and adds 78 calendar days to the contract . The cost reduction is for the substitution of mechanical joints in lieu of ductile iron . The 78 day time extension is necessary because of delays in procuring materials . Due to the complexity and critical nature of the project , the staff will not allow work to begin until all materials have been delivered to the job site . The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 1 . -5- L No . 9-m - Approving Addendum No . 1 to Specifications for Contract No . 5-18R (Rebid ) . The staff recommends approval of Addendum No . 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation and Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station, to Dover Drive , extending the bid date from January 25 to February 22 . This extension is necessary due to delays in completing Contract No . 5-12-2 , the sliplining job connecting to this project . District No . 6 No . 9-n - Authorizing Selection Committee to Negotiate with Boyle Engineering , Inc . for Design Services re Fairview-Gisler Trunk . In the recently updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for the northern half of District No . 6 , the Fairview-Gisler Trunk was identified as a project necessary to relieve the existing facilities . The action appearing on your agenda is to give the Selection Committee authority to negotiate with Boyle Engineering to do preliminary engineering work to establish the alignment and invert of the pipe and elevations to go into Plant No . 1 so that necessary decisions can in turn be made regarding construction of the new Headworks . The engineer ' s work will net include preparation of final plans and specifications at this time . It is anticipated this work will include approximately 60% of the design phase . The staff recommends the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a fee with Boyle Engineering , Inc . for said work . When an agreement has been reached , the Committee will submit its recommendation to the Board fcr approval . District No . 7 No . 9-o - Waiving Property Tax Allocation re Annexation No . 99 - Shapiro Annexation . Initiation of annexation proceedings for this 1 .4 acre single family dwelling parcel , in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Foothill Boulevard in the unincorporated Lemon Heights area , has been previously approved by the Board . The resolution appearing on the agenda is to waive any property tax exchange with other affected taxing agencies in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . -Pursuant to said agreement , the District will receive a one-time $500 allocation from the County ' s Special District Augmentation Fund in lieu of a tax exchange for this property . Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No . 83-20-7 . •me -6- No . 9-p - Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate with Boyle Engineering , Inc . re Design Services for Master Plan Sewers . The action appearing on your agenda is to authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering , Inc . regarding the following two projects which were outlined in the Districts ' recently updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers : a . Airport Relief Trunk . This is a new collector sewer that will relieve existing District sewers which have been shown to be deficient in the John Wayne Airport area in District No . 7 . When complete , the Airport Relief Trunk will drain to the new South Irvine Lift Station . b . South Irvine Lift Station . This facility will provide needed relief to the Gisler Red Hill Trunk and the College Avenue Pump Station which drain the central portion of District No . 7 , the southerly portion of the Irvine Business Complex and the northern portion of Newport Beach . Flow will be diverted to the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer . The staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a fee with Boyle Engineering , Inc . for this work . When an agreement has been reached , the Committee will submit its recommendation to the Board for approval . District No . 11 No . 9-q - Change Order No . 2 to Contract No . 11 -13-3 , Coast Trunk Sewer Reach 3. Included in this change order are additional construction costs of $6 , 926 . 29 for the rerouting of the siphon at 13th Street to avoid 'interference with 23 oil utilities not shown on the records , and removal of abandoned lines . The original plans require the construction of a collector line adjacent to the trunk sewer to tie the city street sewers into our Coast Trunk . Based on the bid prices , we have now determined that it is less costly to connect each street sewer directly to the trunk . The change order eliminates this collector line and provides for construction of 14 manholes (with clean-outs to accommodate maintenance of the city 's system) to enable direct connection of the city sewers to the Coast Trunk . The change order adds $14 , 786 for this revision , however , we will save approximately $40 ,000 in overall project construction costs by making the change . -7- The staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 2 in the total amount of $21 ,712 . 29 and a 10 day time extension for the work . No . 9-r - Addendum No . 1 to Contract with Smith-Emery for Pipe Inspection re Contract No . 11 -13-3. in June 1982 the Directors approved an agreement with Smith-Emery Company for an amount not to exceed $15 , 000 for in-plant pipe inspection during manufacture of the pipe for the Coast Trunk Sewer . The pipe company has taken longer than we originally projected to make the pipe . It is therefore necessary to increase the inspection contract to provide for the extension of Smith-Emery ' s services . The staff recommends Addendum No . 1 to the agreement with Smith-Emery be approved for an amount not to exceed $4 , 236 . Joint Boards Nos . 11 and 12 - Report and Recommendations of the Executive Committee . The Committee met on January 26 and enclosed for Directors is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . Nos . 13 , 14 and 15 - Closed Session re Personnel Matters . The Executive Committee will present its recommendations concerning management and department head salaries to the Joint Boards in closed session . No . 16-a - Approval of Selection Committee Certification and Award of Agreement to Hartge Engineering Co . for Design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk , Job No . I-2R and Rehabilitation of Plant No . 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates , .Job No . PW-099 . At the January Meeting , the Boards authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate for engineering services to rehabilitate the thirty-year-old , unlined Bushard Trunk . The work to be performed includes the preparation of plans and specifications for the lining of the 54" sewer , including manholes , from Ellis Avenue to the "C" Headworks at Plant No . 2 . The lining of the sewer will be separated into three construction contracts as follow: 1 . Ellis Avenue to Adams Avenue 2 . Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue 3 . Hamilton Avenue to the "C" Headworks at Plant No . 2 -8- A fourth separate contract will also be awarded to replace the influent gates on four of the major trunk sewers at the "C" Headworks . These gates are badly deteriorated and replacement concurrently with the sliplining is necessary to control the flow in the trunk sewer . The Selection Committee will meet prior to the Joint Meeting to negotiate a fee with Hartge Engineering Company for said work . The Committee ' s recommendation will be submitted at the Board meeting as Item No . 16-a shown on your agenda listing . No . 16-b - Approving Addendum No . 6 to Contract with Butier Engineering , Inc . for Construction Management Services re Job No . P2-23-6. In January , the Selection Committee was authorized to review the level of effort required by Butier Engineering , Inc . to analyze the $7 . 3 million claim submitted by the contractor for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-23-6 . The work will include a review of the claim and claim documents for validity and entitlement , preparation of a preliminary evaluation , assistance during negotiations , preparation of reports as required and meetings with the Director ' s Select Advisory Committee . The scope does not include any work necessary if this claim is litigated . It is estimated this work will be complete by June 30 , 1983 . The fee for this claim analysis will be grant eligible . The Selection Committee will meet prior to the Joint Meeting to negotiate a fee with Butier Engineering , Inc . for said work . The Committee ' s recommendation will be submitted at the Board meeting as Item No . 16-b shown on your agenda listing . Districts Nos . 2 and 7 No . 17 - Approving Policy relative to Recordation of Notice of Encroachment and Violation of District Ordinance for Connected Properties Outside Districts ' Boundaries . During recent deliberations on the AB property tax exchange issue pertaining to annexing territory , the Boards were advised that certain properties were discovered to be connected to the Districts ' sewer system, yet the owners had failed to annex the land to the District and pay applicable fees . The action appearing on your agenda is to approve a policy whereby a Notice of Encroachment and Violation of District Ordinance would be recorded against the property to protect the Districts ' interests and insure that the monies due the Districts are eventually forthcoming . At such time as the matter is resolved , a cancellation would be filed . �. The staff and General Counsel recommend approval of this policy . -9- s District No . 6 No . 28 - First Reading of Ordinance Revising Connection Fee Schedule . At the adjourned meeting on January 25th , the Board approved revisions to the connection fee schedule as part of the overall long-range financial plan of the District and directed the staff to draft an amendment to the existing ordinance for first reading on February 9th . Proposed Ordinance No . 605 , included with the agenda material , revises the connection fee for single family dwellings from $250 to $500 per dwelling unit and the commercial/industrial fee from $625 per acre to $100 per 1 , 000 square feet of building space . District No . 1 No . 31 - V .A .L . Circuits Permit Revocation . Included with the agenda material is a detailed staff report concerning the lack of compliance by V.A .L . Circuits with its industrial waste permit limitations . V .A .L . Circuits was issued Permit 1 -348 in June 1980 and in the subsequent 22 year period has continually failed to meet its discharge requirements . The firm has further refused to execute Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreements and satisfy other commitments made to the Districts . Therefore , at the regular January meeting the Board established Wednesday , February 9th for a public hearing on the revocation. of V.A .L . Circuits Industrial Waste Permit No . 1-348 . Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH : JWS :hc -10- STAFF Doc LIME1'V TA T1 6 N FOR PERMIT REVOGA' IO:,Sd HEARING Permit No. 1-348 Company V.A.L. CIRCUITS Nearing Date FFBRUARY 9. 1983 o District No. STAFF REPORT V.A. L . CIRCUITS PERMIT REVOCATION PERMIT 1-348 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS It is the recommendation of Districts ' staff that the Board of Directors of District No . 1 revoke V. A. L . Circuits ' Industrial Waste Discharge Permit due to consistent violations of their permit metal discharge limitations. BACKGROUND On June 1, 1980 , the Districts issued V.A. L . Circuits , located in District No . 1, an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit . Since that date the industry has continuously been under permit with the Districts . Between June 1980 and January 4 , 1983 , V.A. L . Circuits ' waste- water was monitored on thirty six separate occasions . Only one of these samples complied with Districts ' discharge limits . The critical metal involved is copper . Because of continued violation of the Districts ' pH limitations , a staff level permit revocation hearing was held on March 16, 1981 . At this hearing, a Sample and Evaluation Program was scheduled to begin on March 30, 1981 . The results of the program were as follows : Limitation Lbs . Over Non-Compliance Metal Lbs . Limit Fees Copper . 5 33 . 9 $1 , 017 . 00 Because of V. A. L . Circuits ' inability to comply with Copper discharge limitations , District staff met with V.A. L . Circuits in April 1982, and requested that the company enter into an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) with the Districts . Although the Company initially agreed to sign the ECSA, they ultimately reneged on their promise . On November 4, 1982 , a staff level permit revocation hearing was held because of their continued violation of discharge limitations and their failure to sign the proposed ECSA and meet the proposed ECSA compliance schedule . At this hearing, V.A. L . Circuits promised full discharge compliance by November 19 , 1982 . However, sampling of their effluent discharge on December 1-2, 1982 and again on January 3-4, 1982 , indicated a continued non-compliance with copper discharge limitations . On January 12, 1983, District staff recommended to the Board of Directors of District No . 1 that permit revocation be con- sidered at their meeting on February 9 , 1983 . LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL The following is a summary of how an Industrial Waste ( I .W . ) sample is handled by the Lab . A complete report is included in the Staff Documentation for Permit Revocation presented to the Board. This summary will mainly be oriented toward a sample that is to be analyzed for heavy metals . The sample is brought into the lab by the I .W . Inspector and he logs the sample. The log sheet includes room for the sample ' s I .W . Lab Data Sheet identification number and other chain of custody information . The sample is then placed in the I .W . sample refrigerator and the I .W . Lab Data Sheet is placed in the incoming -sample book . At the time of analysis , the sample is removed from the. refrigerator and the I .W . Data Sheet is reviewed to determine what analysis is to be per- formed on the sample . A sample requiring heavy metal analysis is first digested and analyzed for the specific metal using atomic absorbtion spectroscopy (AAS) . Digestion is necessary to destroy any of the organics in the sample that may be complexed with the metal and to bring any suspended material into solution . A complete review of the heavy metal procedure is included in the Staff Documentation. Before digestion can begin, all of the glassware for the analysis must first be rinsed in 50% HNO3 , 50% HCL tap and DI water . This is to remove any trace contaminants that could add interference to the analysis . For identification purposes , the sample ' s I .W . Lab Data Sheet number is placed on the digestion flask . A nitric acid-hydro- chloric acid with heat digestion procedure is used following the EPA' s guidelines . After samples have cooled, they are filtered in an acid washed filtering apparatus . The filtering step is required to remove the silicates contained in the sample that may clog the AAS . After filtering, the sample is logged into the AA bench sheet . The bench sheet contains spaces for the sample ' s I .W . lab number and the information to calculate the metal concentration . In AAS the sample is aspirated, in the form of very fine drop- lets , into a flame . A beam of light specific for the element to be analyzed is passed through the flame . The light then enters a monochromator and a detector. The monochromator limits the amount of light entering the detector and divides it into specific wave lengths . The detector measures the amount of light being absorbed by the sample . To begin analysis , the instrument is calibrated using a standard of known concentration . After calibration, the instrument is zeroed using de-ionized water, and sample analysis begins . After every fifth sample , the standard is rechecked. If the reading does not change, the instru- ment is auto-calibrated and sample analysis resumes again . If a problem is experienced, analysis is terminated and the problem is resolved. Analysis then begins on the sample following the previous standard. Tha Analyst will re-calibrate the AA every tenth analysis once he is sure it is working properly . Since the light is specific for the metal , the light energy absorbed by the sample is the measure of the concentration . The sample concentration is then calculated and recorded. The recorded concentration is always rounded down to the lower significant figure . This is to give the industry the benefit of the doubt . After the AA data is recorded onto the I .W . Lab Data Sheet, the Data Sheet is rechecked to be sure that no errors occurred in calculating or transcribing the data. After the data has been verified, the I .W . Data Sheet is returned to I .W . for processing. FLOW CHART FOR I .W W . SAMPLE requiring TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS and HEAVY METAL ANALYSIS Sample arrives in Lab TSS performed, Heavy Metal Analysis prepared . TSS data recorded on I .W . Data Sheet . Heavy Metal Digestion completed . Heavy Metal sample logged into Atomic Absorbtion Area Bench Sheet. Heavy Metal Analysis performed -by AA Area Analyst . Heavy Metal Analysis data transcribed from AA Area Bench Sheet onto I .W . Lab Data Sheet . I .W. Data Sheet submitted for verification . Verified Data Sheet returned to I .W . for processing . V.A. L . CIRCUITS SUMMARY OF EVENTS 06/01/80 Temporary permit issued. 09/09/80 Districts request compliance proposal from industry. 09/ 22/80 . Industry proposes new pH control system and copper filtration system. 01/30/ 81 Districts request pH system to be in by February 13, 1981 . 03/19/81 Staff level permit revocation meeting regarding pH . 03/30/81 Sample and Evaluation Program. To Industry over limits by 33 . 9 lbs . 04/ 15/81 copper. 04/21/81 Cease $ Desist order . 06/01/81 New permit issued for . 020 MGD and - 0 . 7 lbs . copper/day . 01/ 11/82 Districts request payment of past due invoices and compliance with discharge limitations . 04/20/82 Staff requests payment of court judgements . 05/ 12/82 E . C .S . A. sent to Industry for signature but never returned. 11/04/82 Staff level permit revocation meeting, compliance promised by November 19 , 1982 . 12/01/82 Inplant sampling : 3 . 1 lbs . over copper limit . 12/30/ 82 Industry notified of impending permit revocation proceedings . i 1/3-4/83 Inplant sampling : 2 . 2 lbs . over copper limit . 01/ 12/83 District Staff recommends that District No . 1 Board of Directors establish February 9 , 1983 as public hearing date to revoke discharge permit . 01/31/83 Inplant sampling : 4 . 9 lbs . over copper limit . To 02/01/83 02/09/83 Permit revocation hearing. 2,"S/u3 VAL CIRCUITS MONITORING DATri i;PdD '=;NAL'YSI FOR JUNE ' 80 TO MARCH ' 33 DISCH . DISCH . COPPER COPPE PERMIT COP1C . LBS . DISCH . L85 . DATE PH FL06d(f•'1GD) FLUTAI COPPER COPPER LIMIT 0VEr ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 06-80 5 . 5 . 02 . 015 47 . 2 7. 9 0 . 5 7 . 4 07-80 1 .5 . 023 .015 82 15.7 0 .5 15 . 2 0?-SO 2. 0 . 009 .015 62 4 . 7 0 .5 4 . 2 0 1-81 1 . 5 .0095 . 015 62 4 . 9 0 . 5 4 . 14 02-81 5 . 0 GRAB . 015 16 S+E PROG 3/81-4/81 11 DAYS 03-30/31 3 . 5 . 023 . 015 24 4 . 6 0 . 5 4 . 1 03-31/01 3 .5 . 015 .015 42 5 . 3 0 . 5 4 . 8 04-02/03 6 . 5 . 022 . 015 15 2 . 8 0 . 5 2 . 2' 04-03/04 12. 0 . 024 . 015 18 3 . 6 0 . 5 3 . 1 04-06/07 12.0 . 02 .015 23 3. 8 0 . 5 3 . 3 04-07/08 3 . 5 . 021 . 015 26 4 . 6 0 . 5 4 . 1 04-08/09 6 . 5 . 021 . 015 14 2 . 5 0 . 5 2 04-0 9/ 10 9 . 0 .023 .015 11 2. 1 0 .5 1 .6 04- 10/ 11 12 . 0 . 02 . 015 23 3 . 8 0 .5 . 8 04-13/ 14 12 . 0 .02 . 015 15 2.5 0 . 5 2 04- 14/ 15 12.0 .021 .015 64 11 . 2 6 . 5 10 . 7 END S+E 07-81 6 . 0 GRAB . 020 35 11-81 5.0 GRAB . 020 18 01-82 4 . 5 GRAB . 020 130 01-82 3.5 . 021 . 020 47 8 . 2 0 . 7 7 . 5 3E0'2-82 11 . 0 . 009 . 020 10 .8 rt03-82 6.0 . 01 . 020 17 1 . 4 0 . 7 . 7 X04-82 6. 0 . 005 . 020 43 1 .8 0 . 7 1 . 1 ?E06-82 12.0 .004 .020 17 .6 9 . 7 0 06-82 10 . 0 . 049 . 020 27 11 0 . 7 10 .3 07-82 6 .0 .046 .020 10 3. 8 0 .7 3 . 1 07-82 6 . 0 . 049 . 020 10 4 . 1 0 . 7 3 . 4 08-82 8 . 0 .037 .020 16 . 2 5 0 . ? 4 .3 08-82 5 . 5 .052 . 020 18 7. 8 0 . 7 7 . i 08-82 6.0 . 065 .020 15 8 . 1 0 .7 7 . 4 C19-82 6. 5 .0626 . 020 11 5. 7 0 . 7 5.3 09-82 6 . 0 .0502 . 020 11 4 . 6 0 . 7 3 .9 10-82 5 . 5 . 0636 . 020 7 . 8 4 . 1 0 . 7 3 . 4 12-82 7. 0 . 059 . 020 7 . 8 3 .8 0 . 7 4 . 5 01-83 7 . 0 . 044 . 020 8 . 1 2 . 9 0 . 7 2 . 2 02-ezi 9 . 0 . 049 . 020 13 .6 5 . 6 0 . 7 4 . 9 FLOW DATA AND MASS EMISSION DATA INCOMPLETE FOR THESE DATES . SEE FILE FOP, DETAILS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �ITATIpN Al tP cl ICY U � at.e.I"I IGEC 01�� REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE 1981-82 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY STUDY AND REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS February, 1933 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 March 3, 1983 (714)962-2411 TO: Joint Boards of Directors SUBJECT: Report and Recommendations on the 1981-82 Orange County Grand Jury Study and Report on Special Districts As directed by the- Joint Boards, the Special Comittee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts and the Fiscal Policy Committee have reviewed the 1981-82 Grand Jury Study and Report on Special Districts and submitted their findings and recommendations to the Executive Committee. The Joint Committees' report has been reviewed by the Executive Committee and our comments have been incorporated therein. At the March 9th meeting the Boards will: 1) Consider the enclosed Report and Recommendations on the 1981-82 low Orange County Grand Jury Study and Report on Special Districts. The Executive Committee endorses the Report and recommends approval kmi by the Joint Boards for submittal to the Grand Jury and Board of Supervisors. 2) Consider adoption of a policy urging that each member agency limit MW the number of Directors representing that agency to one. This would reduce the Directorship from the current 39 to 26 (Newport Beach and Huntington Beach would have two members in Districts 5 and tud 11, respectively, to comply with the minimum three person Board requirement of state law) . ftw The Executive Committee recommends adoption of the policy. FURTHER, the Executive Committee has referred consideration of consolidating the present seven Sanitation Districts into one single District back to the k'" Fiscal Policy and Reorganization Committees to complete their study of financial and other issues and report back within two months. Upon completion of the study a recommendation will be submitted to the Joint Boards. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '� �`�,•�o� C.C. Donald A. Holt, Jr. ,� Joint Chairman COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ITATI0,V G , 4 of Al H O 9�GE C4"� REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE 1981-82 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY STUDY AND REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS February, 1983 Isw COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA February 24, 1983 P.O.8OX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962.2411 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO STUDY REORGANIZATION OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE ON THE 1981-82 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY STUDY AND REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS BACKGROUND A special committee of Directors formed by the Joint Boards has been studying the possible reorganization of the Sanitation Districts for some time. The Fiscal Policy Committee has been working very closely with the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts concerning the financial Implications of reorganization. In early 1982, the respective Boards engaged consultants to study the Districts sewage systems on a drainage basin concept to determine if substantial savings could be realized from consolidation. Engineering firms were hired to update and consolidate the Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts 1 , 7 and the upper portion of District 6, Districts 2, 3, and 11 , and District 5 and the lower portion of District 6. The 1981-82 Grand Jury commissioned Price Waterhouse, a national accounting low firm, to conduct a study of Potential Restructuring of Special Districts in Orange County. In July, 1982, the Grand Jury issued a report of its findings and recommendations. The Report included funding related recommendations affecting virtually all special districts and organizational recommendations directed at specific districts, including the Sanitation Districts. After reviewing the Grand Jury Report, the Executive Committee recommended the following actions which were approved by the Joint Boards In August, 1982: a) Directed the Joint Chairman to refer the Grand Jury Report to the Fiscal .� Policy Committee and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts. MW -1- ..a low b) Authorized the Joint Chairman to send a letter informing the Grand Jury of the Boards' intent to give serious consideration to the Jury's recommendations and advising that the Report has been referred to the above Committees for a thorough study, following which a formal response Und to the Report will be submitted. c) Requested District Directors to provide staff with any specific comments on items that they wish be considered relative to the Report. d) Directed the staff to review the Grand Jury recommendations affecting the Sanitation Districts and to prepare a summary report thereon for the appropriate Committees, incorporating information submitted by Directors. e) Directed the respective Committees to compile their study and recommendations into a final draft report to the Executive Committee. f) Directed the Executive Committee to submit a report and recommendation for consideration by the Joint Boards for submittal to the Grand Jury and Board of Supervisors. On August 18, 1982, the Joint Chairman advised the Grand Jury of the Boards' intent to give serious consideration to the Jury's recommendations and that the Report had been referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee and Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts (see attached). too The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts (Joint Committees) have thoroughly evaluated the Grand Jury's recommendations and, as directed by the Joint Boards, herewith submit their report. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS TO DATE - ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS On December 8, 1982, upon recommendation of the Joint Committees regarding the engineering aspects of reorganization, the Directors of Districts 1 , 6 and 7 low approved and adopted the recommendations contained in the updated and consolidated Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts 1 , 7 and the upper portion of District 6, and the Boards of Districts 2, 3 and 11 approved and adopted the updated and consolidated Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for their three Districts. The Master Plan for District 5 and the lower portion of District 6 is scheduled for completion in April . m On January 4, 1983, the Joint Chairman submitted a progress report to the Grand Jury (copy attached) advising of the actions of the respective Districts concerning consolidation of their sewage collection systems. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS - FISCAL AND POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS Woo The Joint Committees have carefully considered each of the Grand Jury's recommendations that directly or Indirectly affect the Sanitation Districts and submit the following findings and recommendations: -2- �' 1. Grand Jury Recommendation "Independent and dependent special districts providing water, sanitation, sanitary or trash pick-up services should standardize the use of user fees or charges such that over the next three to five years they are no longer utilizing property too taxes to support annual operating costs. Similarly, any independent district serving only the needs of a local community, such as a community service district, should become fully supported by local fees." Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations VAM Implementation of the Jury's Recommendation 1 would cost the 1 .8 million residents within our jurisdictorial boundaries an additional $16,500,000 annually for Sanitation Districts' services alone, to replace lost „W property taxes. Historically, property taxes were conceived to pay principally for ftw property related services such as fire, police and sanitation. The Sanitation Districts' mission, of course, is to protect the public health and safety by providing this essential service. The role of property taxes in financing such services has been recognized by federal and state � authorities by including provisions in their construction grant revenue program regulations. The Committees fully recognize the concepts and principles behind user fees and, further, acknowledge that Proposition 13 has created certain taxing inequities. However, the Grand Jury's recommendation is a direct contradiction of Proposition 13. The efficiency of the Districts' operations has been demonstrated. The Boards of Directors, working through their Fiscal Policy Committee, have implemented innovative cost-saving measures and continue to monitor activities closely to assure the cost-effectiveness of the organization. The posture of the Directors has been, and in the opinion of the Committees should continue to be, that user fees should be considered as an alternate source of funding to supplement property taxes only after property taxes become inadequate to cover the increasing expense of operation brought about by inflation, escalating .energy costs and additional expenditures required to comply with mandated federal and state requirements. This policy has been successfully followed by District 5, which adopted user fees in 1981 . District 6 is currently in the process of approving a user fee program. The Committees would further like to point out that each of the Sanitation Districts have, since 1976, identified dischargers that place a heavy demand on the sewage system. Such dischargers are charged a user fee over and above the taxes paid to assure that they pay their equitable share of the Districts' costs. With respect to the Grand Jury's contention that the California Legislature's intent is that special districts rely on user fees for raising revenue due to the lack of availability of property taxes after the 1978-79 fiscal year, a Summary of Legislative History Pertaining to Tax Exchanges (copy attached) prepared by the Districts' General Counsel prior to the Jury's study, clearly indicates this not to be the case. tow Based on the above findings the Joint Committees recommend that the existing property tax allocation method for the Sanitation Districts be retained and that user fees be considered as a supplemental source of funding only after property tax revenues become inadequate to pay for costs of operation. 2. Grand Jura Recommendation "The Orange County Board of Supervisors should endorse a proposed change to Proposition 13's enabling legislation (AB 8) regarding the allocation of property taxes to special districts. Specifically, the proposed legislation should provide for the special districts' entire share of the 1% property tax to be allocated by the Board of Supervisors as part of the Country's Augmentation Fund process. Included in this new allocation pool should be the 1% property tax revenue of all districts/jurisdictions currently eligible to receive t, augmentation funds (other than cities and transit districts)." Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations Recommendation 2 would provide the mechanism to enforce the Jury's Recommendation 1 by placing all of the special districts' current share of the 1% property tax allocation ($16.5 million for Sanitation Districts in 1982-83) in the Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF) to be allocated to applicants by the Board of Supervisors. Based on the Joint Committees' findings set forth above under Recommendation 1 , the Committees are unable to support Recommendation 2. 3. Grand Jury Recommendation two "Use of the expanded augmentation fund should be restricted for the support of special district services (as specified below) and specific allocation priorities should be developed. " Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations Wb Recommendation 3 sets forth suggested types of special district services for which the expanded SDAF monies provided for in Recommendation 3 could be used, which exclude sanitation services. It also proposes %:Sri criteria for allocating the funds. The Committees support establishment of appropriate criteria for allocating funds under the existing make-up of the SDAF. 4. Grand Jury Recommendation "LAFCO powers should be expanded to include the ability to initiate changes in special district organization structures so that LAFCO can take a more active role in the investigation of special district consolidation or reorganization. Additionally, special district augmentation monies should be made available to LAFCO to fund these activities." wad law Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations .e Although it does not now have the staff or resources, LAFCO presently has authority to study and submit recommendations concerning special district organization for consideration by the appropriate bodies. In the Committees' opinion, the existing legislative authority is appropriate. S. Grand Jury Recommendation - "The Sanitation Board should formulate a policy to move toward consolidation of the eight sanitation districts into one district and subsequently provide for board membership based on a smatter group of elected representatives." Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations The Sanitation Districts have been functionally consolidated since inception. Through the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement the Districts are administered by a single professional staff - and the joint treatment sewerage facilities are operated as one system. The Boards of Directors of Districts 2, 3 and 11 have approved the recommendations contained in an engineering report consolidating the sewage collection systems for their three Districts. In addition, the Directors of Districts 1 , 6 and 7 approved a consolidated master plan of �► trunk sewer facilities for District 1 , 7 and the north half of District 6. Consolidation of the existing seven Districts into a single district would result in only nominal cost savings ( less than 1%) in the annual operating budget. - The Grand Jury recommends that the Sanitation board membership be reduced and suggests several alternatives. Presently, there are 39 active Directors on the Joint Sanitation Boards that fill the 48 established seats as follows: .� Dist. 1 Dist. 5 1 Santa Ana 2 Newport Beach 1 Tustin 1 Board of Supervisors 1 Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. 3 1 Board of Supervisors 4 Dist. 2 Dist. 6 1 Anaheim 1 Newport Beach 1 Brea 1 Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. 1 Fountain Valley 1 Board of Supervisors ,o, 1 Fullerton 3 1 La Habra 1 Orange 1 Placentia "d 1 Santa Ana 1 Villa Park 1 Yorba Linda .a 1 Garden Grove Sanitary Dist _ 1 Board of Supervisors 12 too law Dist. 3 Dist. 7 1 Anaheim 1 Irvine 1 Brea 1 Newport Beach '_' 1 Buena Park 1 Orange i Cypress 1 Santa Ana 1 Fountain Valley 1 Tustin 1 Fullerton 1 Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. 1 Huntington 'Beach 1 Board of Supervisors 1 La Habra 7 1 La Palma 1 Los Alamitos 1 Santa Ana 1 Seal Beach Dist. 11 �+ 1 Stanton 1 Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. 2 Huntington Beach 1 Midway City Sanitary Dist. 1 Board of Supervisors m 1 Board of Supervisors 3 16 Each community served by the Sanitation Districts presently has representation on the Boards. Because some communities overlap Districts' boundaries, many of these entities have more than one Director on the Joint Boards. These communities are the development �+ and zoning authorities within their respective jurisdictions and provide the local sewer collection systems that discharge into the Sanitation Districts' regional facilities. Thus, each member agency has a vested interest in the Districts' activities and, for this reason, it is the Joint Committees' considered judgement that it is -- in the best interests of both the Districts and their constituents that each of the 24 member agencies continue to be represented on " the Boards. For optimum Board organization, the Committees recommend that the Joint Boards immediately adopt a policy urging that each member agency limit the number of Directors representing that agency to one, regardless of the number of Districts included within each agency. This would reduce the Directorship from the current 39 to 26 (Newport Beach and Huntington Beach would have two members in Districts 5 and 11 respectively, to comply with the minimum three person Board requirement in accordance with the state law). Given the existing functional consolidation, such a policy would effectively implement the Jury's Recommendation 5. The Committees are continuing their study of the feasibility of actually consolidating the present seven Districts into one single Sanitation District and will submit their findings and recommendations to the Executive Committee on this issue within two months. 6. Grand Jura Recommendation "The sanitation services in the south County should be "o consolidated under one agency and consideration should be given to combining the management of sanitation services County-wide. " Ind -6- Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations Imp The principal thrust of Recommendation 6 is that the two joint power agencies presently providing sewerage services in the southern portion of the County, SERRA and AWMA, consolidate under one agency and that consideration be given to then consolidating the south (SERRA & AWMA) and north (Sanitation Districts) into one operation. Inasmuch as the south County area is presently outside the jurisdictional and political boundaries of the Sanitation Districts, it is the opinion of the Committees that comment on Recommendation 6 would be inappropriate. 7. Grand Jury Recommendation "Further studies should be made to determine the cost savings that might result from some form of consolidation/cooperation between cities and Sanitary Districts providing server services in adjacent areas. Specific attention should be given to the sewer- services currently being provided by Midway City Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District, Sunset Beach Sanitary - District, Stanton County Water District, Los Alamitos County Water District, and Cypress County Water District." Joint Committees' Findings and Recommendations .r Within our jurisdictorial territory local sewer services are provided by cities, sanitary districts, water districts and three sewer maintenance -- districts governed by the Board of Supervisors. Therefore, because the Sanitation Districts provide only the regional facilities, the Committees feel that comment on Recommendation 7 would be inappropriate. ¢' Respectfully submitted, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO STUDY REORGANIZATION OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Don E. Smith, Chairman Richard B. Edgar, Chairman Supervisor Roger R. Stanton Henry Frese Bob Perry Carol Kawanami Robert Luxembourger Ron Pattinson Supervisor Thomas Riley Supervisor Harriett Wieder Elvin Hutchison Ron Pattinson Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Joint Chairman (Ex-Officio Member of Committees) Ow ,�, -7- 1COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 11�.��: AREA COODOE 75 OF ORANGE COUNTY540-290 CALIFORNIA �� 9 6 2 -2 411 1 �� ep P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 18 , 1982 Orange County Grand Jury 700 Civic Center Drive West Santa Ana, CA 92701 Re : 1981-82 Orange County Grand Jury Final Report A Study of Special Districts - July , 1982 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts - authorized me, as Joint Chairman, on August llth to inform the Grand Jury of the Boards ' intent to give serious con- sideration to the Jury' s recommendations and advise that the report has been referred to the Districts ' Fiscal Policy Committee and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts . The District Directors have been furnished copies of the Final Report - A Study of Special Districts , to provide the staff with any specific comments they wish to be considered relative to the report. This information will be submitted to the aforementioned District Committees . The Boards have directed the respective committees , Fiscal Policy Committee and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts , to compile their recommendations into a Final Draft Report(s) for our Executive Committee ' s review. The Joint Boards of Directors will then submit their final report and recommendations to the Grand Jury and the County Board of Supervisors . We commend the efforts of the members of the Grand Jury and too appreciate the time and consideration given our Directors and staff during the course of the study. Donald A. Holt, J . Joint Chairman CC: County Board of Supervisors COUNTYS SANITATION DISTRICTS AREA CODE?4 ' OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 962-241101 P. O. SOX S127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270a 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) January 4, 1983 .e, Orange County Grand Jury 700 Civic Center Drive West Sod Santa Ana, CA 92701 RE: 1981-82 Orange County Grand Jury Final Report A Study of Special Districts - July, 1982 Ladies and Gentlemen: In August, as Joint Chairman of the Orange County Sanitation Districts, I - advised you of our Joint Districts' intent to give serious consideration to the Grand Jury's recommendations. On December 8, 1982, Sanitation Districts 2, 3 and 11 Directors approved the recommendations contained in an engineering report consolidating the sewage collection systems for their three districts. In addition, on the same date, the Boards of Directors of Sanitation Districts 1, 6 a° and 7 approved a consolidated master plan of trunk sewer facilities for Districts 1, 7 and the north half of District 6. The Districts' staff is now proceeding with the implementation of the engineers' recommendations. Copies of �+ the engineering reports are enclosed. The engineering report covering District 5 (Newport Beach area) and the lower half of District 6 (Costa Mesa) is not complete, therefore, the Committees have not submitted their recommendations to the Joint Boards. The Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts have directed our staff to prepare a report covering the fiscal and political aspects of consolidation of Districts 2, 3 and 11 as well as consolidation of Districts 1, 7 and the upper portion of District 6. The two Committees are continuing to study the recommendations of the Grand Jury Report on Special Districts - July, 1982 and will be reporting to our Executive Committee in the next few months. -4; Donald A. Holt, Jr. Joint Chairman cc: County Board of Supervisors w/o Enclosures �' District Directors Summary of - Legislative History Pertaining to Tax Exchanges 6-6-78 Proposition 13 - Added Constitutional Article XIIIA Imposed a maximum rate of 1% of the full market value of real property as the permissible ad valorem tax that could be levied. 6-24-78 SB 154 - Chapter 292, 1978 Stats. This was the initial legislative measure to implement Prop. 13 and has as it's purpose the partial relief of local government from the temporary difficulties brought on by Prop. 13 by providing subven- tions from the state. It had two major provisions: The financing for public schools and the distribution of funds for other local agencies including cities, counties and special districts. The bill did not purport to establish how the AV tax revenues were to be allocated among local agencies. That was not done until the enactment of AB 8. The county has continuously asserted that this bill requires all special districts to levy user charges and not receive any AV tax revenue. (See: Government Code Sections 16250, 16260, 16270, 16272) 7-24-79 AB 8 - Chapter 282, 1979 Stats. Among the many purposes of this measure was the implementation of Proposition 13 re allocation of property tax revenues. It included the creation of the Special District Augmentation Fund to augment the revenues of special districts. This too would establish that Districts were not expected to rely solely on user charges. The bill further prescribed the procedure and formula for allocating tax reve- nues when annexations occur. (See: Rev and Tax Code Section 99) 7-28-80 SB 180 - Chapter 801, 1980 Stats. This bill specifically authorizes special districts to negotiate for a share of the AV tax revenue increment realized from any property annexing to the District. (See: Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99.1) 3-9-82 AB 1071 - Chapter 103, 1982 Stats. This bill specifically authorizes special districts to negotiate retroactively for annexations initiated during the "window" period (1/2/78 - 7/28/80) to receive a share of the AV tax revenue increment realized from any property annexing to the District. (See: Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99.2) A seemingly disproportionate amount of emphasis has been placed by some observers on the provisions of Government Code 16270 - enacted by SB 154 on 6/24/78 and which reads: "Section 16270. Legislative findings and declarations: Reliance upon user fees and charges for raising revenue. The Legislature finds and declares that many special districts have the ability to raise revenue through user charges and fees and that their ability to raise revenue directly from the property tax for district operations has been eliminated by Article XIII A of the California Constitution. It is the intent of the Legislature that such districts rely on user fees and charges for raising revenue due to the lack of the availability of property tax revenues after the 1978-79 fiscal year. Such districts are encouraged to begin the transition to user fees and charges during the 1978-79 fiscal year." A careful reading of the entire bill (SB 154) and not just one section out of context (Government Code Section 16270) shows the true intent of the provision, _ namely, that the state was simply telling special districts that because they could levy user charges, they should not expect the state to continue to provide additional subvention money in the future. In the same bill, Section 16272 provided a subvention to special districts for F'Y 78-79 just as sections 16250 and 16260 did for cities and counties. Secondly, the legislature enacted SB 180 in 1980 and AB 1071 in 1982 specifically authorizing special districts to negotiate for a share of the AV tax revenue increment. CW ,mb kow �s EXCERPTS FROM 1981-82 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS Wei told NOTE: The'-Grand Jurytsfull report has previously been provided to each. Dixector, HoQteverr excerpts of the specific -recommended actions affecting the Sanitation Districts that are addressed by this report are enclosed herewith for easy reference. If any Director wishes a copy of the full report, please call Debbie in the General Manager's office at 540-2910, Ext. 208. d I I 1 [ I I 1 I EI RPI . FFI..._ 1 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Page 107) ,e Itectumencintlons Ik!nefits ftntive Imp]peal tans F\�x11ry�, Related: lndepentlent nix] dept-rxlent special • Eliminates treeclecttles of Rome elttze.nR' • Increases cost of governiKrnt to districts providing water, snnita- ditble paying for services throt4ji property scene citIze.ns to mnintnin tlett tion, sanitary or trash pick-tip tax and user fees, wliLle otlters pay only current level of service. Arkli- services sliould stnrwlnnlize tine tine prrmperty taxes. ticxtnl rumnol fees per lreninehold of user fees or charges ftK:h tlurt wand Ix: approximately $33 In the over the next thrive to five years • Eliminates irxecptlty of utlreg property taxes tkrrtlr Gntntty aril $10 (n the South they are tin larger utilizing pro- to support local specific purpose districts. tinatty. perty taxes to support arnxurl olxerntireg rants. Similarly, any • Makes citizens tiny leirelation to services itxlep eoxlent district servirn; curly received aril select desired level of service the vwx-la of a local c xmmmiLty, in proportion to willingness to pity. such as a cemmeitty service die- trict, should become fully sup- • Mikes districts responsible to citizens for porttA by local fees. increased operating costs. EXCERPTED FROM SECTION IV. FUNDING RELATED FINDINGS & RECOM_MENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Pages 41-45) RECOMMENDATION 1 : Independent and dependent special districts Droviding water sanitation, sanitary or trash Dick-uD services should standardize the use of user fees or charges such that over the next three to rive vears thev are no longer utilizing Droperty taxes to suDDOrt annual operating costs . Similarlv , anv independent district serving only the needs of a local community , such as a community service district , should become fully supported by local fees . With the passage of Proposition 13 , the California State Legislature established its intent of funding certain special districts through user fees as evidenced by the following citation from the California statutes : "The Legislature finds and declares that many special districts have the ability to raise revenue through user charges and fees and that their ability to raise revenue directly from the property tax for district operations has been eliminated by Article XIII A of the California Constitution. It is the intent of the Legislature that such districts rely on user fees and charges for raising revenue due to the lack of avail- ability of property tax revenues after the 1978-79 fiscal year ." (States . 1978 , c . 292 , P . 591 . ) . " Reliance on fees or charges for operating income should help control and improve the economic use of resources provided through the public sector. With user fees being collected , the demand and use of special district services will be regulated by the costs consumers face when deciding on the level and quality of the service being consumed . Likewise , the impact of charging for services forces service providers to focus more closely on the costs of providing those services and methods to reduce or control costs . -41- The implementation of user fees would also put the cost of government back on the basis of citizens paying in relation to the level of services received . This would allow local commun- ities to fund increased levels of service, if desired . Most importantly , such an approach would eliminate the inequities of some areas relying totally on property tax to fund operations while other areas receive the same service for a user fee (see Finding 2) . To preclude the accumulation of excessive reserves for those districts shifting from property tax support to user fees , a -- revision in the property tax allocation methodology would be required . This revision is discussed in Recommendation 2 . The central question in shifting toward greater reliance on user fee support for public services is determining which ser- vices should be fee supported . To answer that question, one must deter=--ne how much of the total benefit derived from a service flows solely to the person paying for the service and how much flows to other members of the community who are not paying a fee but are still deriving a benefit . When reviewing all special districts , it is evident that certain services such as water, trash collection, and sewage collection and disposal could generally be self-financed through user fees since benefits are being directly provided to citizens using those services . In contrast, services for flood control , vector control , street and highway lighting benefit the entire community and it is more difficult to rely on direct users for SuDDort . -42- An analvsis o-i ti:e ooeratin� revenue collected -Eor fiscal 1980 indicates the tollowino relationshi? between user tees ar.c taxes for file Various GiStriCtS . FISCAL 1980 P,�V�NU� S0 UP,C-S (*ZILLION) Property 1% Tax Fees or l Dotal Districts Sources C:`la- e tz 0 er aevenues inceoendent : Water (2) 7 . 2 $57 . 3 $67 . 3 $141 . 8 Transit 2 . 1 6 . 8 47 . 2 56 . 1 Sanitation 11 . 6 6 . 9 26 .0 44 . 5 Sang-ary 2 . 0 1 . 2 2 . 6 5 . 8 Vector Control . 7 Community Service .4 - - Ceme ry . 1 Red . ar.c Par''-s . 2 - . 2 All Other (3) - 3 . 5 5 . 8 9 . 3 Deoencent : Flood Control 11 . 8 . 5 3 . 9 16 . 2 Harbor , Beaches , Parks 4 . 5 . 6 10 . 5 15 . 6 -. CSA ' s 1 .0 - 11 . 3 1 !, . 3 Lig ltin� 1 . 7 - . 2 1 . 9 11 Other (4) 1 2 5 Total Deoencent ?1 . 1 1 . 3 26 . 1 ? . I & D Tocal 46 . 9 87 . 1 175 . 7 30Q 1. Other inc'.udes State/Federal aid; interest on reserves; property tax to support debt service. Z. Inc'.cdes water district sewer ,unctions; ?rater-distric_ revenues estisated at -5 -'?.ion. 3. Joint powers: SZRUWA'.PMA/SAC/S3BA. 4. -hree Sewer Maintenance, two County waintenance and Vater works ES -43- Water districts which have a direct service/user relation- sLnip have already supported their operations primarily through. user fees . On the other hand , sanitation, sewer, trash and community services , which are similarly capable of assessing fees for services delivered , are still relying on a mix of user fees and property tax support . The specific impact on water districts , of increasing user fees and no longer relying on property taxes for operating rev- enues , will be minimal . As indicated , a majority of water dis- tricts are already fee supported . Only approximately 5% of the water districts annual revenue comes from property tax and one- third of that 5% goes to the Orange County Water District . If it is assumed that reduced property tax revenues will be replaced by increased user charges , the average increase in water fees (based on the above 1980 property tax fiscal year 1980 data) would be approximately $10 per household annually ($7 . 2 million divided by 750 ,000 dwelling units) . The transition to user fees for those sanitation and sani- tary districts that currently do not have a fee collection system .� in place, would be more difficult to accomplish. Sanitation districts , for example, would have to establish a mechanism for billing the collection agencies (cities , water and sanitary districts) who in turn would pass the costs on to the user. The complete transition to user fees will have to be phased in over time . In this case , if increased fees are to replace reduced property tax revenues , the average additional cost to the citizen (again based on fiscal year 1980 data) would be approxi- mately $23 per household annually ($13 . 6 million divided by 600 , 000 North County dwelling units) . _ For community service districts serving only the needs of a local community , the transition to user fee support is both logical and equitable , as indicated in Finding 2 . The specific mechanism for collecting the user fee would have to be determined (direct billing, additional assessment on the water or property tax bill , etc. ) The citizens of each particular community _aa_ service district would realize the finanacial impact , thus creating a direct relationship between the level of service provided and the specific individuals benefiting from that service . As indicated above , a shift to user fees is a form of increased taxes . However , given the inequities of the current system, the existing fiscal constraints of Proposition 13 and the intent of the State legislature , it appears necessary to shift- selected services to a user fee basis . The first objective for those districts no longer relying on property tax revenue should be the reduction of operating costs and/on the replacement of _ lost revenues from reserves , to the extent possible. If costs cannot be reduced or if reserves are insufficient , then user fees should be established or changed to the extent necessary to balance their operating budgets . The combined incremental cost to the citizen would not be significant. If water, sanitation, sewer maintenance , and trash collection were 100% user fee supported , the additional cost of funding their combined $20 . 8 million in property tax entirely with additional user charges would be approximately $33 per household annually in the north County and $10 per household annually in the south County. It would be appropriate for the county and the districts to agree on a policy such as suggested in this recommendation re- garding those services that should be primarily tax financed and those that should be primarily user fee financed . This policy would reflect both state law and local choices about the use of tax dollars . This policy would serve as a guide for future decisions on allocation of county and district resources . Un- doubtedly , its guidelines would be implemented over a number of years . Over time , compliance with these guidelines would help ensure that all taxpayers paid the same aggregate total of taxes and user fees for similar services . -4 5- r t ' EXLLrcPT1u FRAi d SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Page 107) page Recommendations Benefits Negative Implications (46) 2. 11te (?range County hoard of Sugmer- • Provides mechantsin to enforce Recomnendntion • Will re(purlre a major effort to visors should emiorse a Vmpmsed 1. convince state legislators to change to Proposition 13 s enabling change AB 8. legislation (AO 8) regarding the • Allows property taxes to be allocated to allocation of property taxes to services basal on current need as opposed to • Wiil put an additiorunl burden on sixecinl districts. Specifically, pre-Proposition 13 relative Ixxdget levels. Lire &mnrd of Supervisors (next the L e proposed legislatlotu slrould (busty) to develop fair and provide for the special districts' • Eliminates curr(Knt road blocks to finding effective means of allocating the entire share of Lime 1% propx!rty tax services in rx.•w nrens. Reduces cost of new atgnrntattin) flail. to be allocated by lire lkmntil of housing in the G)t.rcy. Supervisors as part of time (bunty's Atggiientnti(xn fund process. • Reduces tie current disincentive (insuffi- Inclurled In this new allocation cient fmiLng) to ccufAning districts. pool should be time 1% propmerty tax revenue of nil districts/ uris- • Gives one body tIM power (through a fffAhrg dictlons currently eligible to mechanism) to influence the activities of recelve augmentntl(n finvis (other specinl districts in time County and to tium cities and transit dtstricts). encourage cooperation to the degree a..>roI r ate. • At the same time, allows for the benefits of separate single purpose districts Who will regain their Independence after they become user fee supported. • provides a fmnmddnf; mechanism to encrnrrage incrensah coopernLion hx�twven cities arxi the County or spx'cinl districts to pr(mlde services In Lire most cost effective manner. • El lmtnates Lice rx-oxd for 43 separate l bpht ing districts, mnlntenance districts nmi county service nrens. EXCERPTED FROM SECTION IV. FUNDING RELATED FINDINGS 1981-82 GARND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Pages 46-50) RECOMMENDATION 2: The Orange County Board of Supervisors should endorse a proposed change to Proposition 13 ' s enabling legislation (AB 8) regarding the allocation of property taxes to special districts . Specifically, the proposed legislation should Drovide for the special districts ' entire share of the 1% property tax to be allocated by the Board of Supervisors as part of the County' s Augmentation Fund Drocess . Included in this new allocation pool should be the 1% property tax revenue of all districts/jurisdic- tow currently eligible to receive augmentation funds (other than cities and transit districts) . The allocation of property taxes among independent and dependent districts was set in place in 1979 with the passage of „ow Assembly Bill 8 . Under the provisions of AB 8 each city, county and special district received a property tax allocation equal to a specified percentage of its 1978-79 state "bail out" grant . Because of the variety and complexities of special districts , however , AB 8 establishes an amount equal to approximately 16% of the special district property tax allocation to be set aside in a County administered Special District Augmentation Fund. The County Board of Supervisors then is empowered to allocate the augmentation fund to selected districts based primarily on fiscal need. In Orange County, the augmentation fund designated for special districts (including Fire and Library) was $21 million in fiscal 1980, increasing to $33 million in fiscal 1982 . With the above recommended change all special district and Fire and Library property tax allocations (exclusive of the property tax allocated to support debt service and exclusive of the taxes allocated to transit districts) would be placed into the existing Special District Augmentation Fund for allocation annually by the Board of Supervisors . The impact of this change , as shown in the following table , using Fiscal 1980 data , would be to increase the size of the augmentation fund from $21 million to $67 million. -46- SPECIAI. DISTRICT REVENUE SOURCES "p FISCAL 1980 (MILLIONS) dw Property Augmentation Districts Tax Funds Water $ 6 .8 $ .4 Sanitation 11 .6 - Sanitary 1 .4 . 6 Library 1 .0 .5 Vector Control .5 .2 Community Service .2 .2 Cemetery .1 - Recs . and Parks .1 .1 Flood Control 8 .9 2 . 9 Harbors , Beaches 4 .5 - "'d CSA' s 1 .5 1 .5 Lighting 1 .1 . 6 Other - .1 Special District • Total 537 . 7 A= two Fire Fund 4 .5 11 .0 Library Fund 3.3 3 .1 .d Grand Total $45 . 8 521 . 2 20 If water, sanitation and sanitary services were to shift to user fees without giving up their property taxes , these districts wo would theoretically accumulate reserves to the extent of the additional fees . With the suggested change , the property taxes replaced by user zees ($19 .8 million as of fiscal 1980) would be part of the augmentation pool and could be used to support other special districts services allocated according to the priorities suggested in Recommendation 3 . "w This recommended change in the property tax allocation process would produce several other benefits , as described below: Nw • Board of Supervisor allocation of all district property taxes would allow the county to enforce uniform pol- `� icies concerning reliance on user fees or taxes to pay -47- for services . This process would allow scarce property tow tax dollars to be focused on services that have little or no ability to generate user fees and charges . Currently, there is, no mechanism to force independent special districts to go to user fees . • All taxpayers would face the same mix of taxes and fees for similar types of services . Many of the inequities described in Finding 2 would be eliminated. • The problem described in Finding 4 relating to the difficulty in finding revenue sources to support growth in new areas could be eliminated. The Board of Super- low visors could allocate a portion of their augmentation fund to districts providing services in new areas in order to provide funding until the development is complete and user fees are being generated. Also it would not be necessary to force individual developers to pay for the service in new areas , which in turn forces up the price of housing. • Independent special districts would retain their sepa- rate boards and legal existence. Once the districts were operational primarily or totally, on user fees , they would obtain total independence, since the Board of Supervisors would no longer control their revenue source. • This change would force Community Service Districts to go to user fee, as they should do, since the Super- tow visors could and should phase out their property tax support. • It would give the county a strong tool for influencing the activities of special districts throughout the county. This would be helpful for ensuring that the districts ' plans dovetail with the county General Plan and other county policies . It would also allow the Supervisors to influence the consolidation or -48- dissolution of districts that are no longer cost effec- tive (see Finding 3) . It would also allow the Super- visors to help fund the transition of services more appropriately performed by cities . • The County , City and Special District planning process �+ would be improved. Currently the County has an extensive planning process which coordinates planning data and assumptions from all cities and special districts . The County' s planning process could be ,a, enhanced if a requirement to receiving augmentation funds was the coordination and exchange of planning assumptions relative to the growth forecast in the County' s General Plan. In addition to the above changes , this proposal would place the following independent districts clearly under the control of the Board of Supervisors , since they would have limited other sources of revenue than that allocated to them through the Augmentation Fund: Cemetery districts - Recreation and Park districts (2) Orange County Resource Conservation. District Orange County Vector Control District Such a change would appear to be a positive one since all of these districts with the exception of Recreation and Parks , are countywide services . The need for separate Recreation and Park Districts is questioned in Recommendation 14. Library districts would also be dependent primarily on .augmentation funds , however , the need for separate independent Library districts is questioned in separate report of the Orange County Grand Jury . —his proposal represents a major step towards fiscal con- solidation and coordination of special districts . It should be recognized , however, that historically, the legislature has been reluctant to change AB 8 . It would take an effective lobbying -49- effort to make the change . We recommend that the change be adopted on a statewide basis , however, if that is unsuccessful , the option remains to request the legislative change for Orange County only . tow low moll -50- i 1 f I E FR& 1 4 i 1 i I i , t SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECiA.L DISTRICTS (Page 108) i':t t. Kcr,onu,>Inl ions Ik•tu•flrs iW •alive Im,l Irnt i,n,: (so ) :), Ifse of Uxe expsrxltd ntq;nw•nt+tlinn • Fa[nxess in allorntloo. • incrons,til staff tine furl sirnuld Ix: restricted for the ::uplxnC of slx•clnl district • Allwation Ixrsell txt pre-eeaal,l1M A criteria, services (as -specified IxeloW) tux) as opix)sed to Irru mtr_It a:;krd for. slxeclfic all,x•rrtion priorities should be develolx:d. • Allrx-atim llnlu4I to olx•rnt I,q; c•fflcivncy a,xi of lest ivvmss. • Provides nr•civn,lsm to frrxl strtclles of cooperm loidco,sol illat ion. • Provides furxlini; nr•clurnlan to trtursitlon appropriate services bet- -en the cities, special districts :uxl lire (bully. • Polices lire Cruut Limit: calculatirn►s. • Fncottral,es fiscal resitcxr sil,i l it y for districts. EXCERPTED FROM SECTION IV. FUNDING RELATED FINDINGS & RECOM14END?1TIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Panes 50-54) - RECOMMENMATICti 3 . Use of the expanded augmentation fund should be restricted for the support of special district services (as specified below) and soecific allocation priorities should be developed . Special district augmentation fund monies have been suffic- ient to meet all funding requests over the last 3 years , however , in fiscal 1983 , the projected requests for augmentation fund support will equal or slightly exceed the available funds . In subsequent years , the County anticipates the augmentation fund to be in a deficit position, as requests exceed available fund supply . Thus it is necessary that the County develop priorities and allocation criteria for the distribution of augmentation fund monies . Having allocation criteria and priorities in place will be even more critical following the implementation of Recommenda- tions 1 and 2 , when the Board of Supervisors will have a combined _ special district property tax/aggmentation fund pool of approximately $67 million . — We suggest that the Board of Supervisors develop the augmentation fund "definition of use" and "allocation criteria" through the combined input of the Tax Allocation Task Force , the County Administrative office, and the LAFCO staff . Suggested uses of the Expanded Augmentation Fund Pool : The following is a list of the uses for which we suggest the augmentation fund pool be restricted : • Allocations of current vear operating fends to deaend- ent and independent districts , to cities and to the County for non-fee supportable services including the following : '" -50- light4n- and lighting maintenance - streets , roads , parrs and landscapes - construction and maintenance recreation and parks flood control and water conservation vector control - resource conservation cemetery fire protection and library services (even though these services are funded through separate County funds , the State legislature has defined fire protection and library services to be special district functions . Therefore, the Orange County Public Library System and the Fire Protection Fund are eligible to receive augmentation fund monies) . • Allocation of annual operating funds for fee- supportable services while these districts make the transition to a fee basis . • Accumulation of augmentation fund reserves or alloca- tion of funds to districts to support the installation and provision of services in new areas . • Accumulation of augmentation fund reserves for special district operating income support during periods of ''insufficient financing'' or escalating costs or to fund special district capital expenditures . -- • Accumulation of augmentation fund reserves to overcome financial disincentives to consolidation (e .g . , one district may be required to upgrade facilities to specific standards before consolidating with another district) . • Reimbursement to the County for actual expenses incur- red in analyzing and processing special district augmentation fund requests . -51- - o Annually setting aside a fixed amount or percentage to _ be made available to districts to study consolidation and reorganization opportunities as joint projects wi:h the County or LAFCO . We expect that , over the three to five years it will take to make the transition to user fees , the additional monies available in the augmentation fund as a result of user fees will be needed to support increased operating costs and the uses suggested above. If , however, it is found that excessive reserves are being accumulated in the augmentation fund , consideration could be given to rebating the excess to homeowners on future property tax bills . We expect , that the cost of administering such a refund would exceed the benefit , but it is an option that could be considered . JugRested :allocation Criteria the establishment of specific augmentation fund allocation criteria will take a study beyond the scope of this project . We suggest , however, that in the process of establishing the alloca- tion criteria , the following factors be considered : _ • Developing a specific list of services for each district and determining which services are or should _ be user fee supported , i. e. , continue to update the tables provided in this report indicating the extent to r which services for similar districts are user fee or property tax supported . • Determining specific operating cost effectiveness measures (cost/ unit of services , cost/household served , etc . ) for each district . For example : Collect and compare similar data from other _ counties to rank districts with respect to state averages . Identify those districts or areas that have the highest or lowest service costs and determine why . -52- Determine individual district differences that may justify cost variances (e.g. hilly vs . level terrain) Analyze historical cost vs . level of service. • Analyzing district budgets and developing criteria for satisfying augmentation fund requests . For example: Limit funding of reserves to not exceed a speci- fied percent of the operating budget . Reduce increases to contingencies and reserves first . • Specifically reviewing the Gann Limit calculations of the districts to assure that augmentation aid does not cause the district to exceed its appropriations limit . (It has been noted that some districts currently do not calculate their Gann Limit properly . ) • Identifing those districts and services that should implement or increase user fees and establish a definite time table for making the transition. • Developing a special district analysis and survey form to be completed by each district and submitted with their annual operating budgets . This data collection form should : Segregate district services into "necessary" vs "discretionary" categories . State the amount of augmentation funds being requested. Compare current year ' s request to last year' s request and justify reasons for an increase in the amount of the request . Indicate whether or not user fees are being increased or established . Indicate whether consolidation or reorganization studies are feasible or are being considered . -53- Indicate current or proposed programs to inform the public as to their financial needs and available resources . - Identify the impact on level of service if requested augmentation funds are not received. -Sa- 1 ! I 1 I ( ( 1 1 Elk,:t�PTLL) T'Rdre 1 1 � 1 1 i I p I ( I I I I SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Page 108) Recommendations Benefits N1,ative Implications IAI'(X) lxnx•ra slxxtld IKe exp;uxled to 0 Fmimes rcesixtnsibility for Idetttificaticm of • Will ou-cv1 to Increase IABI) staff. lochwke tir. ability U► Initlnte layrovnneot ctpiNrrttatitles. cluloges ill sIx•clal district oil;un►znt ic�t sttvcturt•s ;(� Mutt rt 1'rovickes a muin a of Input to the Sttlxervi sors IAF(X) ctut take it unre netive role (re: lmicrovn:wnt vigiorLt■titles) to ix: WHA In In tlue 11Nentil;alllxl of sliccial inakioq; m1puntatim foul allocatl-in. district ccxtsolldalon or s-mrgmil ation. AcGliti(xu111y • I'ttts district c•tHisolldati(xt/co+)rdinatl()It q,ocial district cup;me•nt lit loll re�pottslbillty in (xtc place. uwoties sitmid he nuuke available to IARX) to [tail tlw:;e activities. • Provides tut orl,tutiwntion to mtuuy,e coctsulticy; sttulit!.s (iAtit:h may Ixe ftsuk.•d tltrotgh llte ay;ux nt.at(cxt ftuul) of ::Ixscl[ic-restttn urliu; opix)rtm i t i en. EXCERPTED FROM SECTION ITT. FUNDING RELATED FINDINGS & RECOM_KEENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Pages 54-54b) RECOMM ENDA710' 4 : LAFCO powers should be expanded to include the ability to -� initiate changes in special district organization structures so that LAFCO can take a more active role in the investigation of special district consolidation or reorganization. Additionally , special district augmentation monies should be made available to - LAFCO to fund these activities . LAFCO as an independent entity has the authority to perform studies of special district organization. However, the agency currently does not have the available staff or resources to conduct many studies . In addition, it does not have the statu- tory authority to implement study results . As a result , many studies on district reorganization which LAFCO staff does complete are not acted upon. A 1980 Auditor General ' s report by the Joint Legislative -- Audit Committee concerning jurisdictional changes in special districts recommended that : "Local Agency Formation Commissions expand the use of their `- existing powers to further encourage jurisdictional changes" and that legislation be passed to: "Expand the powers of LAFCO ' s to grant them power to initiate changes in organization" . We agree with the thrust of the recommendation , although it would not be necessary to pass legislation to increase LAFCO ' S powers if Recommendation 2 was implemented. With the Board of Supervisors administering the augmentation fund and with groper coordination and cooperation between LAFCO and the Board of Supervisors , special district organizational changes could be effectively implemented . -54- LA---CO should be the lead agency , working with the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Office, to study and initiate special district organizational changes . Funding necessary to conduct studies should be made available from the expanded augmentation fund. Since two members of the Board of Supervisors are on LAFCO ' s five person board , the coordination needed between the Board of Supervisors and LAFCO should be attainable . w -54b- l 1 I I i 1 1 I I i Eluhi�PTIlu rRdm ' { ' 1 l ! I ' 1 1� I % I I SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Page 108) I',cLe Recommendations Benefits Negative Implications (GG) S. Ilte ti:urlUcticxt Ik�nr�l racnul�l fonuu- • G►:;t ravlrps (clirctlors ft•ca, etcLninistratjcnt • t:cxnnitp;llnl; of re;ctvt•s will create late a 1xtlicy to nxwc toward Coll- costs). taunt iiw•ciultles. 5I)I I(I,tt loll of IIiv clI,Iti stmiUtt clistr•icts Into olm- clist rict curt • Scnnllet , lc ss tuolxrrs�xcx: Iwrartl. stdiscAlim-otly provide for Ixulrcl utrndx•rsltip I,nsccl ixt elcc'tcvl • sitnlclifityl firl,uu•i:ll plaiutit>!; c";Ix•cinlly III n•ptc•::c•ntative:: of gc•ol;rttldticttl tctnns of t•stal,li:;Iting aigrropriate level— fees. art•a. • Itrsixntslvc•tx;�;.y to local cllizen:;. EXCERPTED FROM SECTION V. SANITATION/SANITARY SERVICES 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Pages 66-69) RECOMME'NMATION 5 : The Sanitation Board should formulate a policy to move toward consolidation of the eight sanitation districts into one district and subseeuently provide for board membership based on a smaller croup of elected representatives . The Sanitation Directors recently have engaged engineering consulting firms to assist in studying the consolidation of the eight districts . Engineering master plan updates , to be pre- sented to the Sanitation Board in July 1982 , will address the feasibility of consolidating and reorganizing the eight districts T based upon the commonality of drainage systems . The District officers expect that consolitation of the districts , in some combination of less than 8 districts , will be recommended in the study . A Sanitation Board committee is also addressing the issue of the comingling of the reserve monies which have been collected on a district basis but which through consolidation would be used in areas outside the paying district . According to District officers there are no other major obstacles preventing consolida- tion. In addition , consolidation of districts would reduce the present board size and may also produce cost savings relative to future capital expenditures through consolidation of facilities . -66- The following chart indicates the present board membership representation from the 20 cities , 3 sanitary districts and the _ County Board of Supervisors . -- Total number of District District seats Representation 1 4 2 Cities , 1 Sanitation District , County 2 12 10 Cities , 1 Sanitary District, County 3 16 13 Cities , 2 Sanitary Districts , County 5 3 2 City, County 6 3 1 City, 1 Sanitary District , County 7 7 5 Cities , 1 Sanitary District, County 11 3 2 City, County Total 48 (Editorial note: Current actual Board Members - 39) Current state law requires that each member city and sanitary district be represented on the Sanitation Board of Directors . Given this requirement , the recommended consolidation to one district would reduce board membership by 50Z by elimi- nating multiple representation from cities which are presently within the boundaries of more than one sanitation district. The resulting board size would then be 24 members , which may improve its effectiveness . With the implementation of Recommendation 1 , the Sanitation Districts will shift from property tax to user fee support for _ operating income. This user fee will most likely be charged to the member agency (city or district) based on the number of dwelling units within its boundaries . Costs would then be passed on to the public through an appropriate billing mechanism. in order to keep the Sanitation Districts responsive and responsible to the public, it would seem appropriate to reduce the size of the Board by dividing the active service area of the combined sanitation districts into several (potentially 5) areas based on popluation and electing, by popular vote , a board of directors representative for each area. With this type of representation , Sanitation board members would be more effective and also more -67- responsive to the local citizens who elected them to office in their respective areas or districts . A second alternative would be to maintain a relatively large board membershia based on one board member appointed from each member city or district , with voting rights based on population or assessed valuation. With this type of representation, Sanitation board members would be responsive to their constituent member agencies and ultimately to the local citizens who elected them to office in their respective cities or districts . The disadvantage of this alternative would be the difficulty in getting 24 board members , whose primary responsibilities are local city council or special district related to understand and concur on county sanitation issues . Another alternative which has been suggested by the County is that the Board of Supervisors become the governing body of the eight Sanitation Districts . This change would require state -- legislation to revise the districts ' enabling statute . Administration of the Sanitation Districts by the Board of Supervisors would have the advantage of merging the sanitation services with the solid waste management of the County. This combination would enable one County agency to maintain respons- ibility and control over solid waste management and sludge dis- posal . County personnel believe that administration of the Sanitation Districts by the Board of Supervisors would enable _ better cooperation and planning among County service agencies and provide other benefits associated with a County-wide sanitation service . The disadvantages to the administration of the Sanitation Dis- tricts by the Board of Supervisors , in our opinion, outweigh the w above advantages . Such an organizational change would result in the -68- County , a general service agency , providing specific services which presently are provided adequately by the Sanitation Districts , an _ independent specialized agency . The tran`er of the services to the County Board of Supervisors would not necessarily improve the present administration of sanitation services in the North County. In fact , _ such a large increase in the Board of Supervisor' s span of control could decrease the effectiveness of board level management of sanitation services . For example, considerable management time is required to — manage the Districts 5 to 10 year capital budgeting program. Current District capital reserves total $143 million which is larger than the county' s general fund reserves . Of this $143 million , $84 million is committed to specific projects such as treatment plant expansion and capital facilities improvements to be started or completed in the next 5 years , The remaining $59 �- million is earmarked for projects planned but not yet in the final design stage. This study did not explore the adequacy of reserve levels . However, it appears that District management has planned a reserve level to meet anticipated capital outlays . In summary, it appears the appropriate organizational struc- ture would be for the Sanitation Districts to remain independent , consolidate into one district and reduce their board representa- tion as described in this recommendation. Additionally the implementation of Recommendations 1 and 2 would put the property tax allocations currently received by the Sanitation Districts into the Augmentation Fund controlled by the Board of Supervisors . In this manner , the Board of Supervisors could encourage the orderly and consistent implementation of user fees for all residents , in both new and old areas , by gradually phasing out the property taxes allocated through the augmentation fund process . In addition, the Supervisors would retain some degree of influence over the Sanitation Districts through the funding flexibilty provided by the expanded augmentation fund . -69- 1 I 'EkI-rxPTl v t"RO SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Page 109) Pn%e RealaneivIntims lk-lt.f it s fkpnt.lve linlil ications - (70) 6. The sanitntton services in the • Gmatty-wide courdinatlm. • Scan loss of local f(WILS of elicit south Cnutty sivuld be anisol idnted hrmtp. uriiec ate I ,eeicy mod coutsideratim • Better long-raotl;e plmminb. slrnild be giver► to co:mbhili ; t.be auto otig stwoit of smiitatt4m services 0 Shurbig of expertise nrxl experience. Cnurty-wide. Cost reduction. 0 Horn consistent Ix)llcy towarvi harxlllrtg of new develolmnrt. EXCERPTED FROM � SECTION V. SANITATION/SANITARY SERVICES r. RECOMMENDATION 6: The sanitation services in the south County should be con- solidated under one agency and consideration should be given to combining the management of sanitation services County-wide . It appears that the development of sanitation services in the south County are paralleling the historical development of sanitation services in the north County. Currently the two joint power agencies , SERRA and AWMA, provide the major treatment and ocean outfall facilities for the south County. However, many of the member agencies have their own treatment plants. Other agencies (e.g. Santa Ana Mountains Water District) that are not members of SERRA or AWMA are constructing their own treatment facilities . To provide for long-range planning and the coordinated development of the south County area, a single sanitation agency is needed. Logically , this would appear to be accomplished .by the consolidation of SERR.A and AWMA and an expansion of their spheres of influence to include all of the south County area. Before this could be accomplished, however, a more detailed study should be conducted to review consolidation methodology with all concerned agencies , resolve major issues and - identify the specific costs and benefits of combining AWMA and SERRA. This recommended consolidation is timely since in July of 1983 AWMA will need to gear down its administrative staff as its government funds expire. Concurrently, SERRA expects to be receiving government funds in 1983 for processing facilities . If consolidation does not occur, AWMA will have to discharge trained, qualified people in 1983 . SERRA has no staff but expects to hire a general manager and an administrative staff in the coming year. In addition, the consolidation of sanitation services in - north and south County should be studied further. At this time, north and south County have different developmental concerns and - significant cost savings from consolidation are not apparent. -70- However, consolidation studies should be conducted to determine if one County sanitation agency would be more cost efficient and effective than two separate agencies . This broader consolidation study could be combined .with the efforts necessary to identify the specific costs and benefits of combining AWMA and SERFA. m w -71- 1 1 l 1 1 I Ea ._2P'l.._ FRCS.. I I I 1 , ` I I 1 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Page 109) T'r+ Recomnendntions Beneftts N-gative Tmplicntions (71) 7. Fltrther stirlles slYruld be made to • Potential cost snvims. detenoltte t1r> cost snv(t+Cs tlwC might result fron txwne form of • Potential consolidntioti or mergers. ctn+sol1dnL1on/coolwratlai lxrtween cities mul Sankary Districts provldlt4; sorer services in adjacent areas. Six-cific attention sirutld IK! Riven to the sewer services currently beltq; provided by Nltlwny City Sanitnry, District, Carden Grove Sanitary District, Smset Beach Sanitary District, Scruitm cot,rty Witter District, lass Almnitos onatty Water District, mtd Cypress County Water District. EXCERPTED FROM SECTION V. SANITATION/SANITARY SERVICES 1981-82 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SPECIAL DISTRICTS RECOMMENDATION 7 : Further studies should be made to determine the cost savings that might result from some form of consolidation/cooperation _ between cities and Sanitary Districts providing sewer services in adjacent areas . Specific attention should be given to the sewer services currently being provided by Midway City Sanitary Dis- trict , Garden Grove Sanitary District , Sunset Beach Sanitary District , Stanton County Water District , Los Alamitos County Water District , and Cvpress County Water District . As indicated by the chart in Finding 7 , there is a wide dis- parity in the sewer operating expenses per household among cities , sanitary districts , county water districts and sewer maintenance districts . There is some degree of evidence of economy of scale from larger districts . Our limited studies indicate that there may be potential cost savings through alternative ways of delivering services , such as , subcontracting or consolidating certain adjacent districts . If Recommendations 1 and 2 are adopted , some of the barriers to cooperation would be eliminated. Additional studies should be made regarding the benefits which might result from further cooperation or consolidation of the sewer maintenance activities in above listed districts with adjacent cities or Sanitation Districts . -71- r ..� ..� �.. ... �.., .n �.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLISA.VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 February 1, 1983 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE January 26 , 1983 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Others present: Donald A. Holt, Jr . , Joint Chairman Director Barbara Brown Robert Hanson Director Don Griffin Henry Wedaa Lydia Levin (Representing Bruce Finlayson Thomas Woodruff, General Richard Edgar Counsel) Ruth Bailey Staff present: Absent: Fred Harper , General Manager Ron Pattinson, Vice Joint Chairman J . Wayne Sylvester , Assistant Evelyn Hart General Manager Elvin Hutchison Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer Supervisor Thomas Riley Convened: 5: 30 p.m. Adjourned: 7 : 30 p.m. 1. Recommendations re Management and Department Head Salaries . The Committee met in closed session to discuss salary adjustments for management and department head classifications . The Committee will present its recommendations to the Joint Boards in closed session at the regular meeting on February 9th . 2. Staff Travel Per Diem. At the Joint Chairman' s request, the Committee reviewed current per diem policies relative to reimbursement for meals , gratuities and incidental expenses of Directors and employees while traveling on Districts ' business . .., No change in the Director ' s policy is suggested . The Committee recommends that per diem compensation for staff be -1- increased to $40 per day, the same amount in effect for Directors . The staff policy provides that the General Manager may increase or decrease the allowable amount when circumstances warrant such an adjustment for specific assignments due to the nature and location of the meeting . If a meeting includes a mandatory meal that is greater than the established amount, per diem is adjusted by the difference between the amount of the mandatory meal and the allowable per diem. When an employee ' s out-of-county assignment includes only a portion of a day, the employee receives a proportionate amount of the established per diem. 3 . Recommended Procedures re Amendment to Political Reform Act . At the January 12th meeting the General Counsel reported on a recent amendment to the Political Reform Act which prohibits any Board Member from acting in a quasi-judicial capacity when the member has received or solicited a campaign contribution in excess of $250 from a party to the action under consideration. It appears as if the only instance in which the new law would apply to District Directors is in the case of a hearing for revocation of an industrial waste permit. The General Counsel has suggested that the Boards may wish to adopt a formal procedure to minimize the chance of error or oversight in complying with the new law. Lydia Levin, Mr . Woodruff ' s associate, reviewed the amendment to the law and the proposed procedures for Committee members . The Executive Committee recommends that the procedure for implementing new statutory provisions re campaign contributions set forth in the General Counsel ' s memorandum of January 19th, including the attached exhibits , be adopted by the Boards . Joint Chairman Holt indicated that he would pursue with the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) at their upcoming conference the possibility of introducing changes to the Act and/or FPPC regulations to clarify ambiguities pertaining to the solicitation provision of the new requirements . 4 . User Fees for Local Government Entities . Staff is in the process of revising the Districts ' Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance to comply with the latest federal and state requirements . It is proposed that the revised ordinance , after consideration and adoption by the Boards of each of the seven Districts, take effect July 1, 1983 . One of the important policy issues to be resolved by the Boards is user fees for local government entities . Revenue program regulations provide that all users of a sewerage system must pay "their fair share" of the cost of maintaining and -2- operating the system. However , the regulations currently allow the option of exempting local governmental entities when ad valorem taxes are utilized for payment of maintenance and operating costs . Current Districts ' policy exempts local agencies , however , federal and state agencies are assessed user fees . The Committee recommends that the current policy of exempting local governmental entities from user fees when ad valorem taxes are utilized for payment of maintenance and operating costs be continued . The Committee recognizes that in some instances local government facilities , such as the County' s complex in District No. 1, represent a substantial load on the District' s sewer system. Therefore, the Committee further recommends that the Board in any District where a local unit of government places a disproportionate demand on the District' s system, reserve the option of modifying this policy to charge such an agency user fees to more fairly distribute the financial burden of serving such properties . 5 . Request of Garden Grove Sanitary District re Deferral of Connection Fee Collection Until Final Inspection. Districts 2 and 3 have referred to the Executive Committee a verbal request of Garden Grove Sanitary District to delay collection of Districts ' connection fees until the final inspection is requested on a new dwelling unit. The General Manager reported that staff is contacting each of the affected cities within the District to determine what impact such a policy change would have on their city' s procedures. The results of the study will be reported to the Executive Committee at the next meeting . 6 . Proposed Amendments to the California Ocean Plan. The General Manager reported that the State Water Resources Control Board had issued a draft environmental impact report pertaining to proposed amendments to the California Ocean Plan. Our staff is encouraged by the draft policy regarding sludge disposal which appears to take scientific information into consideration rather than making purely arbitrary determinations . The draft recommends that the following footnotes be added to the Ocean Plan. A. A statement affirming the Board ' s intent that sewage sludge residues shall be disposed of in the manner found in each case to have the least adverse impact on the total natural and human environment (emphasis added) . B . Circumstances under which a Regional Board , with the concurrence of the State Board and EPA, may consider -3- granting an interim permit for ocean disposal of sludge residues (emphasis added) . The conditions for such consideration should include: 1 . An Environmental Impact Report which shows clearly that any available alternative disposal method would result in greater adverse impact on the natural or human environment than the proposed project (emphasis added) . 2 . Other conditions as specified in Guidelines for Ocean Plan Implementation, to be published by the State Board . -4- LAW OFFICES OF Rourke & Woodruff JAMES G.ROURKE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TELECOPIER:(714) 835-7787 THOMAS L.WOODRUFF SUITE 1020 ALAN R.WATTS CABLE ADDRESS:RORWOOD KENNARD R.SMART,JR. CALIFORNIA FIRST BANK BUILDING TELEX:00-4294 ALAN R.BURNS 10S5 NORTH MAIN STREET ROBERT L.LAVOIE DANIEL K.SPRADLIN SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 LYDIA S.LEVIN TELEPHONE (714) 835-6212 MEMORANDUM To: Joint Chairman and Members of the Executive Committee County Sanitation Districts From: General Counsel Date: January 19, 1983 Re: Procedures to Implement New Statutory Provisions re Campaign Contributions I have recently provided to all Members of the Boards of Directors a memo- randum outlining the basic provisions of A.B. 1040 (Chapter 1049, 1982 Stats.). That memorandum opinion pointed out, in summary form, with a copy of the actual legislation attached, that the Act prohibited any elected or appointed member of a legislative body acting in a quasi-judicial capacity must disclose any campaign contribution received or solicited within the preceding 12 months which exceeds $250.00. Furthermore, the Board Member is prohibited from voting on any such matter which is brought to the Board for action, unless the campaign contribution is returned within 30 days. I did point out in a verbal report to the Board Members that as a practical matter, this statute would have very little application, in view of the fact that the only fact situation that would require this application would be the revocation of an industrial waste discharge permit. However, in those instances, it would seem appropriate to have an advance procedure approved by the Boards. In view of the fact that there is a revocation hearing set for District No. 1 at the Joint Board Meeting of February 9, 1983, it was necessary for us to develop an immediate procedure in accordance with the statutory requirements. In turn, we are suggesting the following procedure to be approved by the Boards, so as to minimize the chance for error or oversight in reporting and disclosing any campaign contributions made to any Board Member, or Alternate. The recommended procedure is as follows: 1. At such time as the Staff procedure relative to proposed revocation of the permit is completed, with a recommendation to be presented to the Board of Directors, notice of such hearing and scheduled date would be provided to the Permittee. 2. Concurrent with the notice given to the Permittee of the scheduled hearing, �./ an additional notice would be given to him that would point out the provisions of Government Code Section 84308 (see Exhibit "A"), and require him to file a certificate (see Exhibit "B") with the District listing any Director to whom he or his Y � 1 Page Two January 19, 1983 agent has made a contribution of greater than $250.00 in the preceding 12 months. 3. The District Staff would review the file pertaining to the Permittee to ascertain the names of any parties that would appear to be financially interested, such as the owners. Notice of the legal requirements would be sent to them (see Exhibit licit). 4. Upon receipt of the reporting form from the Permittee, the Staff would then prepare a form notice to all of the Directors (see Exhibit "D"), as far in advance of the hearing date as possible, identifying those persons listed by the Permittee "applicant", as well as those names discovered by the Staff, to assist the Directors in searching their files relative to having received any campaign contribution. 5. In the event any Director has received a campaign contribution and therefore cannot vote, upon the Staff receiving notice of such, the Staff will notify that Director's Alternate for purposes of attending the meeting and the hearing. While at first this procedure may seem to be particularly cumbersome, I would suggest that in practical effect the District has so few of these revocation proceedings, that it will not create a particular burden upon any Board Member. We do anticipate, however, an increased number of hearings in the past due to intensified efforts by the Industrial Waste Division. It is simply our effort to try to minimize the procedure, and at the same time to protect the interests of the Director from mistakenly participating in a hearing if in fact some interested party has made a campaign contribution to the Director in the preceding time period. Lastly, as a practical matter of implementation, the Fair Political Practices Commission has issued its Regulations declaring that any contributions received prior to January 1, 1983, need not be reported. Accordingly, for the next year, the reference to campaign contributions received in the preceding 12 months, will not be . applied literally, but only from the period of January 1, 1983 to the date of initiating the hearing. Both my office and the Management Staff would welcome any suggestions or comments to this procedure. Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel TLW:pj Attachments cc: Mr. F.A. Harper Mr. J.W. Sylvester ; `ai✓ NOTICE TO APPLICANT California Government Code Section 84308 requires you, as an applicant before the Board in a matter pertaining to a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to include with your appli- cation a statement disclosing any campaign contribution of two hundred fifty dollars ($250. 00) or more made by you or by your agent, to any director or alternate director of County Sanita- tion District No. within the twelve months preceding the date of your application. Your application will not be considered until the attached form has been completed' and returned to 'the District. Therefore, please complete the attached form and submit it with your application. The directors and alternate directors of County Sanitation District No. at the present time are: [List current directors and alternates. ] EXHIBIT "A" REPORTING FORM an applicant before the Board of County Sanitation District No. in a matter per- taining to a license, permit or entitlement for use, have made a campaign contribution or campaign contributions of two hundred fifty dollars ($250 .00) or more to the following directors and/or alternate directors of District No. within the twelve months preceding the date of my application: My agent or agents has made the following contributions of two hundred fifty dollars ($250 . 00) or more within the twelve months preceding the date of, my application to the following directors and/or alternate directors of District No. (IF NONE, WRITE "NONE") Dated: Applicant ' s signature EXHIBIT "B" NOTICE TO PERSONS SUPPORTING OR OPPOSING A LICENSE OR PERMIT b.' Government Code Section 84308 requires certain individuals who support or oppose an application or other matter related to a license, permit or entitlement for use to disclose campaign contributions of two hundred fifty dollars ($250. 00) or more made to Board members and alternates within the last twelve months. Copies of Section 84308 and pertinent regulations are attached for your review and your determination as to whether you fall within the reporting requirements set forth in Section 84308. EXHIBIT "C" \..V NOTICE TO DIRECTORS On January 1983, the possible revocation of the industrial waste discharge permit held by (the "applicant") will be before the Board of Directors of District No. _ Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308 , no director may receive a contribution of $250 or more from the applicant while this matter is pending or for a period of three months following the date of decision by the Board. In addition, if since January 1, 1983, a director has received a contribution of $250 or more from the applicant, the applicant' s agent or any person who supports or opposes the application and has a financial interest in the matter, the director must disclose that fact and abstain from voting. To the best of the staff' s knowledge, the applicant and other persons actively supporting or opposing the revocation who have a financial interest in this matter are as follows: Each director should review his or her files to determine if contributions of $250 or more have been received since January 1, 1983, from the above-named entities or individuals or from any other entity or individual known by the director to 'be financially inter- ested in this matter. If such contributions have been received, that fact must be disclosed and the director may not vote. EXHIBIT "D" LAW OFFICES OF Rourke & Woodruff JAMES G.ROURKE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION THOMAS L.WOODRUFF TELECOPIER:(714) 835-7767 SUITE 1020 A LAN R. WgTTS CABLE ADDRESS:RORWOOD KENNARD R.SMART,JR. CALIFORNIA FIRST BANK BUILDING TELEX:aO-4294 A LAN R.BURNS ROBERT L.LAVOIE TOSS NORTH MAIN STREET DANIEL K.SPRAOLIN SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA 92701 LYDIA S.LEVIN TELEPHONE 1714) 83S-6212 MEMORANDUM To: Joint Chairman and Members of Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts From: General Counsel Date: January 12, 1983 Re: Amendment to Political Reform Act re Campaign Contributions Effective January 1, 1983, Section 84308 has been added to the California Government Code amending the Political Reform Act with regards to elected officials receiving campaign contributions and their ability to participate in quasi-judicial proceedings on the Boards in which they serve. In summary, this amendment to the Act prohibits any elected or appointed official from accepting, soliciting or directing contributions of $250.00 or more from any person who is applying for a license or permit, as well as any person financially interested in said application. The prohibition has certain time limits-- namely, for a period of 12 months preceding the application and for 3 months after the application is acted upon, the Director must disclose receipt and must not vote on the application. I am attaching a copy of the Assembly Bill, and it is rather complex, and in my opinion, is rather inartfully drafted, leading to the further opinion that it is subject to legal challenge in several respects. BASIC ISSUE: Are members of a Sanitation District Board governed by the provisions of A.B. 1040, thus requiring disclosure and non-voting on quasi-judicial matters? ANSWER: Yes. While the Bill will have application to the Sanitation District Directors, its actual application is so rare as to hardly warrant any particular concern. Specifically, it would appear that the only instance in which it would apply would be upon a hearing for revocation of an industrial waste discharge permit that has been appealed from the decision of the General Manager. As noted above, it is my opinion that there are a great number of ambiguities in this Legislation which lead to the probability of some legal challenge as to its validity. However, in view of the relative infrequency of application to the Sanitation District Directors, it is my opinion that compliance be followed. This will be obtained Page Two January 12, 1983 by the District developing a form requiring any applicant who presents a permit to the Board for hearing, to fill out, in detail, the names and amounts of contributions in the preceding 12 months made to any Director who will hear the application. We will likewise advise the Directors of the names of the responsible parties involved in the application, so that you may make individual investigation of your own records to determine whether the applicant or a financially-interested party in fact has made a contribution to your campaign. In such instance, that contribution must be disclosed, and unless the amount of the contribution is returned within 30 days after learning of the applicant and the contribution, the Director may not vote on the application. The statute makes reference to contributions to be used in a federal, state or local election, and it is my opinion that the monetary contribution and the 12-month period are cumulative in effect, so that if an applicant has contributed to your campaign or to any other person at your direction, for any one or more elections within the 12-month period, that the provisions of this statute would apply. Lastly, it should be noted that legislative bodies such as a City Council and the County Board of Supervisors are expressly exempt from this statute, except while acting as a member of another quasi-judicial Board or Commission. This is, in my opinion, inclusive of the County Sanitation Districts, even though the "quasi-judicial" aspects of your responsibilities are rare indeed. I would urge that at such time as any applicant files a proceeding to be heard by your Board, that if specific questions are raised, that you contact me and I will review them in detail and provide you with a specific opinion. Z�i Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel TLW:pj Attachment cc: Mr. F.A. Harper Mr. J.W. Sylvester POLITICAL REFORM--CAMPAIGN-CONTRIBUTIONS Assembly Bill No. 1040 CHAPTER 1049 �.d An act to add Section 84308 to the Covernment Code, relating to campaign contributions. (Approved by Governor September 14, 1981 Filed with Secretary of State September 15, 198Z] L.ECLSL.ATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1040, Levine. Campaign contributions.' Existing law under the provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974,does not prohibit an elected or appointed officer,or alternate, or candidate for office, from accepting campaign contributions of $250 or more, from persons who have applications for licenses, permits, and' other- similar documents pending before any quasi-judicial body of which an elected officer is a member. This bill would so provide and prohibit'an elected or appointed officer, or alternate, or candidate for office, as- specified, from accepting a contribution of$250 or more, from such person until 3 months• after a decision has been rendered. It would provide for specific disclosure requirements and specify the boards and commissions to which the bill would apply,including providing that any person who actively supports'or opposes a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before a specified quasi-judicial board-or commission shall submit a statement.to the board- or commission disclosing any contributions of$250 or more made within the last 12 months by the person or his or her agent to any member, alternate, or*candidate-of that board or commission. The people of the State of CAGfornia do enact as foAows•. SECTION 1. Section 84308 is added to the Government Code,to read: - 84308. (a) No elected or appointed' officer, or .alternate, or candidate for office, who serves. on. a quasi-judicial board or commission; other than those governmental bodies specified in subdivision (d}, shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more,from.any person.or his or her agent, who has. an.application for a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before any body of which the officer or alternate is a member and for.three months following the date a decision is rendered on the application or from any person,or his or her agent, :who actively- supports* or- opposes. the application; provided,however,that the officer or alternate knows or has reason to know that the person who supports or opposes the application has a financial interest, as that term is used in Article 1 (commencing with Section 87100) of-Chapter -7.-This prohibition shall apply regardless 'of whether the officer, alternate or candidate accepts, solicits,or directs the contribution for himself or herself or on behalf of any other officer, alternate, or candidate for office.- ' . :• 4:.(b) :Prior to rendering any decision on an application for a license, permit or'other entitlement for use pending before a quasi-judicial board .or commission, other than- those governmental bodies specified in subdivision (d),each member and alternate acting in the capacity of a member who has received a contribution to be.used in a federal. state,or local election in an.amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more from an applicant or any person who supports or opposed the application, and who has a financial interest, within �.d the. preceding 12 months must disclose that fact.:.No elected or appointed officer or alternate or candidate for office who serves on a quasi-judicial board or commission,other than those goverrunental bodies specified in subdivision (d).shall vote on any application for a license,permit or other entitlement for use pending before any �ymboi p.indicates tort deletion, 5485 Ch. 1049 STATUTES OF 1982 body of which the officer or alternate is a member if the officer, alternate,or candidate for office has willfully or knowingly received a contribution to be used in a federal, state, or local election in an amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more within the preceding 12 months from the applicant or his or her agent,or from any person,or his or her agent who actively supports or opposes the application; provided, however, that the officer or alternate or candidate for office knows or has reason to know that the person who supports or opposes the application has a financial interest, as that term is described with respect to public officials in Article 1 (commencing with Section 87100) of Chapter 7, in the decision. . If an officer, alternate or candidate for office who receives a contribution to be used in a federal, state, or local election which would otherwise require disqualification under this section, returns the contribution within 30 days from the time he or she knows, or should have known, about the contribution and the application for a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, he or she shall be permitted to vote on the application. Nothing in this section shall be construed to imply that any contribution subject to being reported under the Political Reform Act of 1974 shall not be so reported. (c) Whenever any person applies to a quasi-judicial board or commission, other than those governmental bodies specified in subdivision (d), for a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, that person shall include with his or her application a statement disclosing any contribution to be used in a federal, state, or local t..� election in an amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more made by the applicant, or his or her agent, if any, to any member, alternate,or candidate of the board or commission before which the application is pending and which have been made within the last 12 months of the date of the application to any such member,alternate or candidate. Whenever any person actively supports or opposes a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before a quasi-judicial board'or.commission, other than those governmental bodies specified in subdivision (d), that person shall submit•-a statement to such board or commission disclosing any contribution to be used in a federal, state, or local election in an amount of two hundred fifty dollars (S250) or more made within the last 12 months by the active supporter or opponent or his or her agent,if any,to any member, alternate, or candidate of that board or commission. No person, or his or her agent, who has an application for a license, permit, or other entitlement. for use pending before ..any quasi-judicial board or commission, other than those governmental bodies specified in subdivision (d),or a person who actively supports or opposes the application shall make a contribution of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more, to any elected or appointed officer, or alternate or candidate of that board or commission for three months following the date a decision is rendered on the application. The majority shareholder of a closed corporation that has an application for a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before a 5486 Changes or additions'in tort are indicated by underline �.d 1981-1982 REGULAR SESSION Ch. 1050. quasi-judicial board or commission, other than those governmental bodies specified in subdivision (d), is subject to the disclosure and prohibition requirements specified in subdivisions (a), (b),and this subdivision. I • .. . (d) Legislative bodies such as city councils, county boards of supervisors, and the State Legislature while acting as a body or a committee thereof are exempted from the coverage of this section. However, this section applies to any member of such a legislative body who serves as a voting member on another quasi-judicial board -or.commission which considers individual applications for licenses, permits,,or entitlements for use. State constitutional officers who serve on a board or commission as a requirement of their constitutional office are not subject to the provisions of this section. For purposes of this section,a person actively supports or opposes. an application if he or she lobbies in person for or against the application, testifies in person for or against the application, or -otherwise acts to influence members or alternates of the board or commission for or against the application, and the person has a financial interest, as described in Article 1 (commencing with Section 87100) of Chapter 7, which will be affected by the decision. SEC.2. The Legislature finds and declares that the provisions of this act further the purpose of the Political Reform Act of 1974 within the meaning of subdivision (a) of Section 81012 of the Government Code. err/ - RESOLUTIONS AND- SUPPORTING-DOCUMENTS DOCUMENTS FEBRUARY 9,' 1983 7:30 P, I k!,FUND NO JT DIST WORK1146 CAFITtL C PROCESSING DATE 1111183 PAGE I 3EPORT NUMAEi AP43 7 CCUN7Y SANITATION DISTRIC79 OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/12/83 --VENnbr(-- AMOUNT 9 ES CR IPTi ON 062221 A-1 NUPSERIES $22.31 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES $15.30 DEMURRAGE 062223 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $550.00 MANHOLE REPAIRS 06222q ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 192-22 VALVES -AKrl'l tW-ATIC F1 L-T 1.0.*- INC. 5--5-.-_8_3__ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0 E,222 u AMERICAN COMPRESSOR CO 1932.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 062227 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ___$425.4 0 ___CSDOC 06222 THE- WHIDA-PACKINGIC' S66*25 PUMP PARTS 062229 AQUA BEN CORP. $149415.41 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 062230 BAKER PLYWOOD CO.s INC. $691.76 SMALL HARDWARE '06223 1 Eif:CKHNN-TNSTRUME 141 CONTROL-EQUIPMENT. -. . - —_ 062232 L.W. BEMIS TRACTOR t IMPLEMENT $61.88 TRUCK PARTS 062233 BIG BOX RENTAL CO. sl 9320-00 TRASH DISPOSAL 0, 0 CONTRACTOR 11-13-3 062235 CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. ;Iql.sl WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES 06223f. CS COMPANY $492941 VALVES -I __tfWCk REPAIRS C OT_ 06223e CALIFORNIA DISTRIBUTORS $88.94 SMALL HARDWARE 062239 JOHN CAROLLO ENG/GRCELEY HANSEN $49242*20 P2-21-6 SIART-Rtl-±2--21CPNSTRUCTION.--. $926*00 FEEDER RENTAL .0 0(2241 CHAMBER-MIX CONCR�;E, INC. $647*84 BUILDING MATERIALS t! 062242 CHEMWEST INDUSTHIES9 INC. $259587.96 ODOR CONTROL CHEMICALS AND C 6 0'6 2 2 4 3 —rlatV WU V.-T—INC. $39252.31 GASOLINE 062244 BRIAN CHUCHUAS JcEpq INC. $5*502*49 USED VEHICLE 062245 COAST COMPUTER CENTLR# INC. S59.36 COMPUTER SUPPLIES D IST. .37 _HiCT L SUPPLIES FIT Of.2247 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $189.33 ENGINE PARTS rr 062248 ROBERT V. CURTIS 126.40 * s2 6.40 f - ; -- SPECIAL iAS-SESSM_ENT REFUND .-____Of2249 _____DAICYf;fLOT__'__ i2S6 LEGAL ADVERTISING I-A 0E225G DECO $36.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C ey 062251 DELPHI SYSTEMS, INC. $19392.50 AIR PROGRAM I-y6J_.Tli_ WELDING REPAIRS 2 062253 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $431010 PAINT SUPPLIES c.1 062254 EASTMAN9 INC. S719o99 _OFFjgE_5OEPLjfS -,I 062255_ 'S-3 8-0- PIPE SUPPLIES C10 062256 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $167.52. LAD SUPPLIES 062257 GANAHL LUMBER CO- $162.13 LQ-ER-- -----GENEAAr-TEj:EFyH0NE-_n— _ifq_9_66._U --U TELEPHONE 062259 MR. HAROLD 61MENO AN; MR. FELIX O'KANE $94-84 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 062260 M.E. GRAY CO. $795.63 PIPE SUPPLIES -' 062261------ -CREEK-9-ASS70CI-A-TrS 9 It 0-U'T— SURVEY 11-13-3 062262 HEK SALES $9.79 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062263 TED A. HAMMETT $108000 13 f!jEj. SP•!.LL Ge2264__ INDUS TRT_AC_"r-LA_9T1_Cs_ SMALL HARDWARE 06226t MICHAEL HEINZ b36.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 062266 HERTZ CAR LEASING Slv605.21 VEHICLE LEASING '!► - FUND NO `.'1`3" - JT f1ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/11/83 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - - COUNTY SANITATTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' I CLAMS PAID J1/12/h3 . WARRANT.._TvO_._- -- ---"- - - -- - ----- VfNf.OR ...___---_.. . ------- ---.__ ----- AMOUNT -•- •---._ -------------DESCRIPTION - -- 0622b7 HOAGLANO-ARTUKOVICH, J.V. $1209304.00 CONTRACTOR P2-25-)A --06?26E - -H0USE---OF-BATTER IE,'. 06226c, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S39550.k2 WATER USEAGE 06227L' ISCO COMPANY $2,464.45 CONTROL EQUIPMENT -'-062e -1 -` -----"TNGRAM•P7CFER--- - -32d7:53-`� JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 062272 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. S70.20 TRUCK PARTS 66227? IRVINE RANCH WATFR DISTRICT $3.20 WATER USEAGE -062474- ---JONES-THEMTCALSi_Z NL - i�356-?8- CHLORINE - 062275 KAMAN HEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $246.77 BEARING SUPPLIES 06227E KING BEARING• INC. $162.14 BEARING SUPPLIES ---062277 _- ----_ .L_8 .H-CONSTRUCTION,`J":V-`-------------•-•---.- -i4T:444�35-______ -_ - -- . ....__.---- -- --kil _...._ 0622714 L.6.W.S.9 INC. I•1r575.41 CONTRACTOR PW-098,- RETENTION 2-14-4R WELDING SUPPLIES 062279 LAkRYrS BLDG,. MATERIALS, INC. $108.96 __ BUILDING SUPPLIES --062280�--"-"-LIFECOM-SAFETY•-SfR'VICE SUFPCY-- _- - -'- i4?4:00 FIRST AID SUPPLIES - 062281 LIGHTING DISTRIIIuT01tSr INC. $747.06 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062282 LISOVORE, INC./ARIE BLOK 1604.23 BELT PRESS CONSULTING 062283 -- - LOCAL-AGENCY-FORMATION-COMM-ISSION---- �---- 062284 MCCOY FORD TRACTOR $213.72 TRUCK PARTS 06228�-• MCMASTfR-CARR SUPPLY CO. $245.11 SHALL HARDWARE 062286-"T-- NdTTONAL'STINTCS---'- `- - SIT1 39 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062287 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1210.42 WATER USEAGE 06228P NOTTINGHAM PACIFIC CO. $74.20 EQUIPMENT RENTAL -'0 -2285--- ORANGE-COONTY-AUTOI'ATi- TS E323:7T TRUCK PARTS 062290 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $569.02 PIPE SUPPLIES 0622a1 OXYGEN SERVICE E $96.00 DEMURRAGE_e: - 0 6 2 29 --2- ---" -'-COUNT Y-OF-OR-ANGE- _ iN79:08 PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMINATIONS 062293 COUNTY OF ORANGE s42.00 PROCESSING FEE 062294 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY S4,256.63 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP, FUND '-06229'"-----`-"--ORANGE-COUNTY--WATER--Q7-STRTCT---'- £203.70 WATER PRODUCTION 062296 PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. $193.66 PAINT SUPPLIES • 062297 PACIFIC TELEPHONE 1111.38 TELEMETERING -._-___ - -- 06 29P---- - " PEATi TCRECI^& � MARWICK� MI -CO:----- - -' S70 .bOv--` DISABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTING 062299 PICKWICK PAPER Pk0DUC7S $19062.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 062300 PITNEY BOWES i87.45 POSTAGE METER RENTAL -- - • ----POWER SYSTEMS-- --""---"-"---------`--`-----`- -5187.7� TRUCK PARTS ry 062302 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S27.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE 062303 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $309.25 TRASH DISPOSAL_ -_ _ 062304 "-- "- AND--C FUTER--CE"NTET;- -- 3106:68- i6 USER CHARGE_COMP__-UT- ER SERVICES 06230t• ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO. $19378.02 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062306 RUTLAND TOOL 8 SUPPLY $88.85 TOOLS --- --- - ---- --- 062307`-----SANT'A-`ANA-ECECTR7C-HOTOE�-- -'-sI72:5 --ELECTRIC ROTOR -PARTS--- 062308 SEAL ENGINEERING CC. S29379.37 PUMP PARTS 06230`% SEARS• ROEBUCK 8 CO. i412.71 TOOLS e_ - - SH MFTO-Cif-SUPPLY-` -------- ----i1 307:04 TOOLS 062311 H.C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO. $65:077:00 CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 062312 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $27.22 TOOLS C -FUND NO 9 iT DIST WOFKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/11/83 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTYS_t9I TAT ION 01STWICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/12/83 WARR_ANT_N07.____________ _ 062313 SOFTWARE PUBLISHING COPP- $31.80 ECIIN I.-CAL. jQQRNAL5...----------- _T 062!ili -SOFTWARE-STORE COMPUTER SOFTWARE 062315. SO. COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $178*92 REGULATIONS 062316 So. CALIF. COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT $26057.00 062317-- F RN—CAL-I F_.-I D I'SON't-O". POWER 06231 E SOUTIIEFN COUNTIES OIL CO Z?:035:20 DIESEL 062319 STAkOW STEEL $19779.67 '603216- EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 062321 SULLAIR SALES & SERVICE $21.46 PUMP PARTS 062322 THE SUPPLIERS $157.33 BUILDING MATERIALS 0 62 32 3 "J. --WAYNE-"SYLVE-STER- PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 062324 TAK TAKAMINE $b16*00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 062325 ARTHUR H. THOMAS CO. 181.82 PubP ?A *, _'062326_____ F.'M.' T HO M A S-A I R -C 6140 I'T f 33D3.41— CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 062327 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYs INC. 319313.8q TRUCK PARTS 06232e UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. 17q-32 GASOLINE UNION-SIGN SAFETY SIGNS 06233E UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $197.43 DELIVERY SERVICE 062331 UNIVERSITY SALES I SERVICE $17.76 173 .062332 LAB SUPPLIES 062333 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO, $446.09 PIPE SUPPLIES 062334 VAUGHANOS INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO S66.00 PIPE SUPPLIES C3062335 9 1 6.65 CONTROL- . . - EQUIPMENT 062336 THE WALDINGER CORP. $439651*66 RETENTION PI-19 062337 JOHN R. UAPLES ---$.365.2 0 OD.Q"0N5ULTANT___._,__ $56.96 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 062339 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICEHTER S2*643.02 ENGINE PARTS r 06234(,- WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP $5q2.83 ELECTR CAL -59PPI If5 0 62 3 4 1 __lU H I T I I FINE_-9__VC R-V I L L E'---' 6 9--6 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 062342 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF 1437:00 LEGAL SERVICES G'Y ----------------- '12 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/12/83 $598,801.81 FUND NO _ _.9199 -.. !T..PI5T. 414RKING GAPITA4 ._ ._..__ _-_ __.. _...PRoCE51NQ PATE 1/11/83 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - -- - --- ---.. --- _. . CLAIHS. PAIQ...._1/!2/.83. - - SUMMARY - _._._ ..... - -_._....- -- ---- ---------- — --. AMOUNT-- ----- --- .--. .. 12 OPER FUND . _........- ------- 13 OPER FUND 787.45 d5 OPER FUND 295.70 15 ACO - #5 F/R FUND 66.00 #6 OPER FUND 119.92 .17 OPFR .FUND- _ 3,1!22,92._... 17 ACO FUND 94.84 #11 OPER FUND 474.00 '• _... U 11 ACO. FUND --- - --- — --_. _—----___,_.211.194,.OQ 95E6 OPER FUND 604.85 #667 OPER FUND 3,794.24 _JT. OP€R FUND - -- - --- - -- --- 205,786,39 CORF 323.978.50 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 56.96 _-------SELF_FUNDED_-WQRKERS._._.C.OHP_.-..INSURANCE F NO h.256--63. --_-.._. _..----._-._ . ___ . _ JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 22,530.29 .. - -----TOTAL-...CLAIMS--PAIp...01/12/83-- — - ----I598-;801-:81--- - -- -------- - - - - - _. ..-- - -- I cot U. $28.49 LAB SUPPLIES AIR -CAL IFOVNIA 1121-1-00 FARE -VARIOUS-MEETINGS- 062363 ALPHA-BETA CO. $63*625.38 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 06236� AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $91.24 LAB SUPPLIES a6236C THE ANCHOR PACKIN6 CO. s2,IsI.92 PUMP PARTS 1162372 6JERLY ASSOC14TLS, INC. $550-00 WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR 06237� OLACK DECKER MFG. CO. $63.84 TOOLS co 362371; BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE t170.15 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 062381 CS COMPANY $29033.40 VALVES r 06230? CAL-THERM CO. 119610.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06238r� JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S4091.38 ENGR. 5 YEAR MASTER PLAN UPDATE 06?387 ART CARA TRANSMISSION $q23.02 TRUCK PARTS 0623811 CHAMBER-MIX CONCRETEo INC. s130.20 BUILDING MATERIALS 062391 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS $107.8A BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION bf.239! COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $11050.12 ENGINE PARTS n 62 39 f. CULLIGAN DEIGNIZ[O WATER SERVICE $64.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 06239ci DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $6,773.38 TRUCK TIRES ' � � � ' / � wo ~~ df ... .. -.-^.,I ctif ^ .-^ ~"^"^"`°^ "~.� ^'' .'"^ ,`"' y� ' ^vuw.r ^om/ /^/ /vn v/u/x/:/s v/ unAmoE cuunav '--- ' . . ---WARRhkT-NO. AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION—— 06240 1 OELI III SYSTEMS9PAYROLL TAX UPDATE |' . ao*ou oIopon^nLc WASTE SYSTERS9 INC. SLUDGE- GRINDER_ / IIE2404 OOPADO ENTURrkiscs, INC. al 903.00 PLANT #1 DIGESTER REPAIRS »�+u 0(240v noww cnuA000 CORP. uee PAINT ap*� UMP PARTS 62405 cxnTxAN. INC. ^402.30 uprIcs uuppL|cs / 6»*10 cumn4xo cuu�pwcmT v538.64 TRUCK PARTS anm �� -' ' '`_Lnrw'emTcxpmIucm" INC. -- '- - ��147"09---------uFFIxc-suppC|ss-- --- ------ - ' - ---- czm, cLcc/oomxc nccmom/uw SLox/cc $zm.xo USE moAnue ansnPAxmcwT 624 13 Exv/^ouwcnrxL xruuup:c ASSOC- *u7.50 pumL|cAxImms 6e*14------' --cwv/xorecro ' -- -----' --'- --- -- --'--'-' vn'^ra - oumTnmL sQW|pwswT 6-a15 FILTER uuepLv co. ^nnu.v7 :22swmIms PARTS ' 62416 pInu/co u PORTER CO. m329.89 p|Ps umpPL|ss ' 6o^17-- - —pzuncR ScxcwT IFxcAL cor-' -- ------' -----' ---- *�°o�ru--------��m-supposo--------------'--------- ----- ' i.2*18 FuoTx/wc 7xucx Euoxpmcw7 co. $734.8e TRUCK PARTS . 62*19 puuwrxzw v^LLc, xxncxx x270.70 FILM pnoccss!mu �o*z�----- ---x�r,-up'pn»nrx�m-vx��c�---- -----*���x��s�---------w4���(-4sa4os---- --- '----- --------' -- - - e2421 r/u pnxn000 cnmp^mx uI.xpa.00 CONTROL sQuopmsmT ' *12422; pn«ucc compncmson puuouc7 *c,o,sa compxsssom PARTS 6e*23-- ------'pacouuw------' ---------'-----------'-------' ' --**��rm----------Tuuco''e�mrs--'--------------- -------' ----- uup*cq CITY or ruLLcx7nm v27.8* ux7sR ussAoE ' o+eqou sw w41wamxwnc9 INC. x161.15 SMALL wAnowxmc -'----uxwx^L LUMBER CO ---------- -- -'--*��������--------�uMa�n--------- --'- ----- - -----' ' - ot-2*27 acw-n,-Lzvc pLAnT)cn CORP. 1162.66 aunLoIm$ maTsnnwLu V6z4xa ncwEx«L TcLcrnomc CO* $5.e2e^07 TsLcpomws | ' oae*cs M.E. op^Y Co. prpc supPLIss--- ------ -'- ---' -'- / naz^ua ^xLpxzu nuppL, CO. $565.59 SMALL *AnowAms / IEc A. x^wncn 12.397.00 cuvuTp cAwvom nA�wwATcx xAcuum rnuuu|wu ' oa,�u»-- '-- ' 'o*py/w»,uw-xmuuwIx/xc-pmu] /co - -----'-- ---- m � - "o�� n«--- -L----smx�[-o4now4eE-- --- --- - --- -' --' -- � o«24-43 *,L/ I, INC. 1155.13 SMALL wAwowAxs 062*34 noLc«cw. INC. $59860.00 cuusTIc omoA HOLLYWOOD v,xc OF un«msIF - - - '*786;60 ----'----"-TRUCK T)nss' - - -- - - - 062*36 CITY OF ouN/xmoTnw oc«:x ' *n^nv weTsu ussAas 062437 *ow,/warom ocnn/ uooem aTxwp xI»^»c orF:cE muppLIsm '--' oak+uo------- - - *owrIwerom m UPI Lv ----�--'-- -- ----------�---- -vy��aa----------�m�[�-*AoowAuE----- --- ------- -- ---' --- ' o62e9 I.x.p.M.o. *cAuuu^xTcnu v13.52 TscomouAL JOURNAL 062+4G Iuxnxn pxpc« vaaa.r* opFocE SUPPLIES L�-- o6e441- zN/zRwx7xnm«L nuo/wsyo*wxo*xuc -------------- x -----OFFICE- SUPPLIES ------- --'---'----- ' - -- oap*o Im,Eow^//owAL m/wxcowpurm v510.85 compuTEu TERMINAL FILTERS oazw» JxL *xmopxcIooIwo, INC. $nu.^a USE cmAnac uVswp�YmcwT ' o6e^� - - JoNcs cHEwxcxL�, 'INC.- --- - ' - - -�oa"mu.va--' -----coLumwc - '-- - - o6xqfiE xAm^w pcxnImax u xupvu 1816.20 useuIma xuppLvcs c62*1` KING osxxxms. INC- $664^99 Bs4mnwo suppLIcs _ _ ^i ' '| | | / i Fl1Nfi NO 4 - J1 1)1S1 WORK INC= C9FITAL PROCESSINC DATE 1/21/83 PAGF 3 f*! REPORT NUMBER AP43 COl1N1Y SANITAI)ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE- COUNTY - I CLAIMS PAIL' : 1/26/R3 -WARRANT NO. VEN00P _ A40UNT ._. .. _..... - - ..._._..._...- DF3CRIoTION - -- - -- ------ -_ 062447 L K N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO 149233.11 UNIFORM RENTAL - 062448 _.... L.Lt.W.S., INC. :.. $10820.17..._ .. .__.......WELDING.SUPPLIES - GE2449 W.1t. I_,*I:WIG CO. $151.32 PUMP PARTS 062451) LAPhY'S BLDG. hFTCP1ALS, I(-;C. 5290.12 BUILDING MATERIALS 062451 LAURA C.UDCEROS - . ....... 124,59.1.01---._-------•----USE-CHARGE' OVERPAYMENT-•-"------.-_.... -----_-.--.-..--_-- _ ' 0624112 LEUCO ELECTRIC CO. L?43.52 TRUCK PARTS C624 )3 LILIZAU FATTERNS, INC. $2*41t.50 DRAFTING SUPPLIES A 2454 - - - - L IFECOi!-SAFETY SEkVICE--SUPPLY-- --- - -- - _...---._..__.._i7?:58 - -'SAFETY--SUPPL I ES 062455 LIGHTING DISTRIEUTORS, INC. $296.42 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06245C LONG PEACH SANDBLASTING CO. 119993.75 SANDBLASTING A..). LYNCH CO. - -- E862.k5 - ----JANI-TORIAL""-SUPPLIES JE245R M F PORT-A-GUIL1 CO. $133.13 BUILDING MATERIALS 0E24b9 MADDEN SUSCO $29010.82 PIPE SUPPLIES __.._.06246u- - -._...... MCHAS-1iR-CARR-SUPPLY--('0:-.-...- - _..._ - .- S263:U0-- --SMALL--HARDWARE. -- -.. _ .... -._. 0624E1 MICCL, INC. $132.76 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT G62462 MILLERS FRINTERY 678.02 TYPESETTING I ' DE24E3... . . .... NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY _._._. .. .._...._.. $1°4.01._. ..--- SMALL HARDWARE 062464 CITY OF NEWPORT REACH $10.26 WATER USEAGE + i 062465 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY $19575.Q0 MANHOLE REPAIRS ---06P466•••------- - NUPATIC-••EN6INE[RINO--- - ..__.__._____---._...-_--_-- --;lfs2:ty- ELECTRICAL SUPPL-IES ._-- ---.--...___..-- - --.. .- -_- ----- .--. -- -- . G62467 OCCILENTAL COLLEGE-CASHIER $605,90 OCEAN MONITORING i 062461i OLE LEE• INC. $197.18 PUMP PARTS _ .._ 0622464------- ---------ORANGE--GOUNTY-FARM SUPPLY-•C.•C._...---_..___._._._.---....-----S45w-73 ----LANDSCAPINO-SUPPLIES--- ----- -- -------- ---- ..I 06247L ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $514.35 VALVES ;j 0622471 OVCZHLAO DOOR CO of ORANGE CTY $497.50 DOOR REPAIRS "I --062472- ---• -•----OitY6EN-SEKVICE••------- ---$13fi:99- SPECIALTY-GASES-•------'----- .. 062473 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,092.40 LAB ANALYSIS, RADIO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 062474 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTPOLR 125,361.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES -- 062475 COUNTY -SANTTATION-GISTR-ICTS OF ORANGE-COUNTY --' $b9970:49--- ---REPLENI'SH WORKERS'- COMP:--FUND - - --- 062476 PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. $19145.05 PAINT SUPPLIES 062477 PACIFIC PUMPING CO. $19.33 PUMP PARTS � --@6?47H -------- PAGIFIG TELEPHONE-----__ _ ..__ ...-•--••----•---___.._- _..--1174:04--- --•-TELEMETER-1NG _ __. _ _.._ _...._-.._.-----------...-... ...__. --• -_ _-. 062475 PARTS UNLIMITED $782.68 TRUCK PARTS 062480 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $268.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -- C62481 -- PLAC:ENTIA TRUCK WRECKING---- --------. - gi18.00 - -- -- - TRUCK PARTS_ ..-----_..__-__.._._-__ _-----------.._,... .._...- --.._.. ...._. _.. 062402 PORTER BOILER LERVICE, INC. $148.10 BUILDING MATERIALS C62483 POSTMALTER $119a0.o0 POSTAGE --- -i27:-00---------INDUSTRIAL'•WASTE'-SAMPLING-ICE -- - - _-.-----•--. . .. C624P5 RED VALVL CO., INC. 1259.20 VALVES 9E•2486 THE PF.GISTER $474.32 LEGAL ADVERTISING --0624P7 ...._._._—._.RcL1Al ILE--CONC.RETL-CUTTING-GO.- .-------- -- L1i7.50 --BU'ILDINO'-'MATERI'ALS--- ----------- ------- - 06?486 ROBBINS & MEYERS $583.00 PUMP PARTS 062469 RUTLAN9 TOOL & SUPPLY $25.94 TOOLS -----J6245l0--- 062491 SANCON INC. $39000000 BOX COVER REPAIRS 062492 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $927.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES "I 1 a' FUND NO 91 IT 1)IST 40F.KINO CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/21/63 PAGE 4 REPORT NUI4r`+FR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION--OISTkIC IS- Of-'ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/?6/R3 - -WARRANT-WO• --..__ ._.. --- -VENDOR- - - ._.... . ._.... . _ -- ---AMOUNT------ ---- - -._...._._DfSCR IPT ION -- - -----_- -- O6219 SANTA ANA DODGE. 1.1.06.13 TRUCK PARTS • --062454_. .._.._ TA ANA F.LECTkIC••MOTbkS - -._._... .. .._ _._._ _. . 13s9b3.76.- ------_-ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS - 062495 SCHOLL 3 CO. ADVERTISING 1512.50 PUBLIC INFORMATION CONSULTING 0f.2496 SCOPUS CORP. 12 037.50 COMPUTER DISK PACKS --06?457 - _ -- C.1 fY--(IF---SEAL--DI:ACH--- --_----------- _._.._..._...---.... ........i 26g:00- -C3DOC-13-MANHOLE-REPAIRS- --- _---- ------ 0E249A SEARS. -ROEBUCK L CO. 119249.48 TOOLS 062499 SHAMROCK SUPFLY $2.231.12 TOOLS .. .------06P506 -.--------A.H-•--aHIPKEY�--INC--.- -. -__-#q6��-4-------•TRUCK-TIRES---------------------__- -- --._..--------... ._ _ _ „ 062501 SLAUDEN INGINEf.RIl-IG $285.00 TESTING P1-19 Of25C2 SMITH-EMERY CO. $19896.00 TESTING 11-13-3 •• _. _.._..062bd3_._.._ .... SOLAR-TURSINES- INTERNATIONAL __ ..._...._... ---._..... .------._._.-- $1961-0.•50. TURB 1NE"BLADE-CLEAN I NG-" --"-"-•"-•"-""' 06?904 SOUTH COAST CFFICE EQUIPMENT b1.3g8.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 062535 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 196.U34.63 POWER r - --DE2bu6- - -- SO-CAL-iF-E-NERGY-COAL-ITION•-AND ENGINEERING SUPERVISION- 1Z50:0'J---------COALITION'MEMBERSHIP-FEE - - I. 0F2507 S0. CAL. VAS CO. $25 036.95 NATURAL GAS 062508 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. F89954.39 DIESEL FUEL . 062b0. -- SPARKLE TTS-ORINKIkG- WAI"R----•_..._...__._-._.--•.----•---. .. 1648.06------BOTTLE0"'WATER -- ---------- ___-._._-- --------.--_ 062b10 STRkOW STEEL $29987.78 STEEL STOCK ! I 062511 SUPER CHEM CORF $670.45 SOLVENTS 05251! J. PAYNE SYLVESTER 1335.8E PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 662514 TAK TAKA14INE $130.00 SEAL BEACH PUMP STATION MAINTENANCE D36 - 06251 5- ------?-AYLOR-INSTRUMENTS----- ---_ -_ --5138;88 --CONTROL EQUPPMENT-- - - ------- --- -- 06251C THOMPSON LACGIIER CO. $1027.30 PAINT SUPPLIES 1„ 362517 TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL9 INC. $19137.25 CONTROL EQUIPMENT -----5`11:80-----AI-R--FARE,-VAR IOUS-MEET•INGS'---- _. .. - -------_•----.____ 062519 TROJAN BATTERIES $813.19 TRUCK BATTERIES ,. 062526 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY• INC. 1935.65 TRUCK PARTS - 66252 1-- - ---iUSE5AL-E4--_._....--- -- - --- -- ---------__ ....I159:04- _ P IPE--SUPPLI E-S---._ -. - ---- - -- -------- ---.._._. 062522 J.G. TACKER S SOFA• INC. 1445.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062523 U.S. AUTO GLASS. INC. $172.71 TRUCK REPAIRS - ----g6r524-----------• - UNITED-CONCkETE P11'2-OIV-•----------•-_..____._._-_-___. 'i5t892.712'-- ---"-BUILDING-'MATERIALS- - 062525 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $38.69 DELIVERY SERVICE 062526 UNITED STATES UQUIUMENT CO., INC. 1538.78 COMPRESSOR PARTS -- 062527 -.. VWk SCIENTIFIC 06252P VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 11.133.33 PIPE SUPPLIES 06.52" VALVE E STEEL SUPPLY CO. 6739.35 VALVES OE2530 ----•-•-- --- -- iHr WALUtNGEk- COkP:--------------•------ ---.--_..-. ..E4o348:34'_-___--.-CONTRACTOR-pI'_19-----•--- ._. - - - - Of•2531 WARRfN 8 BAILEY $461.37 PIPE SUPPLIES 062532 WAUKESHA ENGINE. SEPVICENTFR $489.91 ENGINE PARTS ----G62533--------WI-STINGHOUSE-ELECTRIC -CORP--•------- - 06?534 WF!�TOIL TERMINALS $10.45 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 062:•S5 WESTWARD HOSE $19550.58 HOSE SUPPLY • _ •____06c53h ---- -B-fic-WHL IS ONE-d•-•A SSOC I ATE - --- ----- ----i.33d:00- ---#6--USE-CHARGE-PROGRAM I NG----------- -- - ------- 062537 WIT7G SCIENTIFIC $193.60 LAB SUPPLIES 062531' THOMAS L. WOODRUFF 179495.35 LEGAL SERVICES FUND NO `i - .IT 1?1;>T WOI1KTNG CAI ITAL PROCESSING DATE WI/V FAGF 5 REPORT YU'IRER AP93 __- CouN1Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF -ORANGE C GUN IY CLAIMS PAID 01/26/83 --WARRANT- NO----- _ - ----- .... VFNL�Otc-- - -- - AMOUNT.. .._.—_ _.._- - -- -.--_._ OE SCRIPT10N-'.-- - -- -- - --- -- -._ . 062539 XEROX COkP. $39191.34 XEROX REPRODUCTION ---0E2599--- ---YOUNG-1:4CIATOk 00.- --------- '- - _ .. __._--_---- -E56T.-BI--"—.-___._ELECTRI CAL-SUPPLIES ----------------- ' .---- --- --- -------•--•---._.-._�._.__...TOTIC-EiAIM^-NA-TU_.O1-/2G/g3-------------tr.30i�36:.1,8-_. _—�.___—_____.-___---•-------- -------,. ' —_-___..SUMMARY_________.___ AMOUNT_ --- -at3. MR FUNQ---- -.. -- -•..--- --•----- -._._... ------ --- ----------$..._5..590.63----- - -- -__ __ -- ------- #2 ACO FUND 4.96 #3 OPER FUND 9,150.37 � __.U5._OPER_FUHD_ _—__i.335.-94_r. - ------------------_-- Lf5 F/R FUND 1 ,247-09 N6 OPER FUND 330.00 ---_17. OPER._HIN10_ -- - ---L.933.._3; - ---- - -- #11 OPER FUND 4,123.36 /11 ACO FUND 1 ,896.OD " —1566. OPER _2.,933-1-9_ JT OPER FUND 251 ,810.09 �---'----�--- �-`---'---- ---__.... CORF 184,149.38 --_._SELF._FUND ED_.LIADILI-TY._INSURANEE_ 64.90- -- __-- -_.--------.---------.-------- -•_ SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 7,520. 19 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 152,947.70 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/26/83 $630,036.18 .,I I.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. 4 CONTRACTOR: Hoagland/Artukovich, A Joint Venture DATE: January 21, 1983 JOB. Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant 2 (Basins), Job No. P2-25-1A Amount of this Change Order (ADD) 000=4 $ 21,982.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deletions from the contract price are hereby approved: ITEM A The Original Contract Documents did not require the Contractor to re-establish the operation of Digester Cleaning Line immediately after he removed same prior to his excavation work in the area. In order for the Districts to maintain its schedule of Digester Cleaning the Contractor was instructed to re-establish the operation of the line by routing it around his excavation, a route that required added materials and labor than originally specified. Reference: PCH-251-14 ADDED COSTS $ 19,892.00 ITEM B The Piping for the Floor Drain System in the Primary Sludge Pump.Station as detailed in the Contract was determined to be inadequate in size to serve its intended use. The. Contractor was instructed to increase the pipe size in the system and extend a portion of same to the area sump. Reference: FWO-251-2 ADDED COSTS $ 2,090.00 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Date: November 26, 1981 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 23, 1983 Time Extension This C.O. 00 Calendar Days TOTAL Time Extension 88 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 453 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date: May 22, 1983 Original Contract Price $ 3,512,000.00 _ Prev. Auth. Changes S 378,813.00 This Change (ADD) 49EBd6T4 $ 21,982.00 Amended Contract Price S 3,912,795.00 Board authorization date: February 9, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA By: By: Contractor Chief Engineer "C" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" Page 1 of 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: L _& H Construction, J.V. DATE_ January 31, 1983 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-098 Amount of this Change Order (Add) ct) $ 13,162.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. Contractor is hereby directed to remove 500 cubic yards of material, grade and shape to drain, and set 2 catch basins at a unit price of $8.00/C.Y. of material and $2,055 per basin, including connector pipe: 500 cubic yards @ $8.00/C.Y. = $4,000.00 2 catch basins @ $2,055/EA. = 4,110.00 $8,110.00 $ 8,110.00 2. Contractor is directed to install a temporary road into Districts warehouse area for a lump sum amount of.. . . 756.00 3. Contractor is directed to backfill and compact a trench located northeasterly of Districts warehouse for a lump sum amount of. . . . 831.00 4. Contractor is directed to excavate and recompact settlement adjacent to chlorine influent plant water line for a lump sum amount of. . . . 3,465.00 TOTAL ADD: $ 13,162.00 "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" Page 2 of 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: L & H Construction, J.V. DATE January 31, 1983 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-098 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Hedtcct) $ 13,162.00 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 10, 1982 • Original Contract Time 75 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 22, 1983 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Original Contract Time 75 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 22, 1983 Original Contract Price $ 129,718.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 38,520.00 This Change (Add) fi $ 13,162.00 Amended Contract Price $ 181,400.00 Board authorization date: February 9, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2/l/83 Deputy Chief Engineer By. 2/1/83 By 2/1/83 L&E CONSTRUCTION, J.V. Contractor Chief Engineer "D-2". AGENDA ITEM #,{9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-15 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE JOB NO. P2-25-1A A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 (BASINS) , JOB NO. P2-25-1A, PROVIDING FOR EXTENSION OF TERM OF SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-lA; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for an extension of term of the agreement from September 30, 1982, to January 31, 1983; and, WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary to further amend said agreement to provide for continued construction management services through the date that said project is accepted as complete by the Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated , to that certain Engineering Services Agreement dated December 9, 1981, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, and Butier Engineering, Inc., for construction management services in connection with Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 . (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, providing for an extension to the term of said agreement from January 31, 1983, to the date that Job No. P2-25-IA is accepted as complete by the Board of Directors, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "E-1" MENn!! ITEM #9(F) - ALL DISTRICTS ''E-1" Section 2. That said additional construction management services will be in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, with no increase in total maximum amount of $109,250.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself . and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 5, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. "E-2" AGENDA ITEM Pg(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-19-2 Ord WAIVING AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION EXCHANGE WITH OTHER AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES RE ANNEXATION NO. 43 TO DISTRICT NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION EXCHANGE WITH OTHER AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES RE ANNEXATION NO. 43 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 8 of the California Legislature, 1979-80 Regular Session, provided, in part, for the implementation of Article XIIIA by enacting Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 95 through 100.5, inclusive, and further provided that prior to the effective date of certain jurisdictional changes, the governing bodies of all agencies whose service areas or service responsibilities would be altered by such change shall meet to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such affected agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said provisions the District has met and negotiated with the County of Orange to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between the District and agencies governed by the County Board of Supervisors for those areas located outside the jurisdiction of any sanitation district but within the tributary area; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors on June 9, 1982, approved the negotiated settlement with the County of Orange re tax exchanges on annexing properties, as recommended by the Select Committee re Negotiations for Tax Exchanges for New Annexations (AB 8) . NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: "F-1" AGENDA ITEM ##9(1) - DISTRICT 2 7-1" Section 1. That in accordance with the terms and conditions of the negotiated settlement with the County of Orange concerning tax exchanges on annexing �...� properties, the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with •other affected taxing agencies for the following annexation: Annexation No. 43 - Forrester Annexation to District No. 2 Section 2. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Local Agency Formation Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(j) - DISTRICT 2 ,IF-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 Vr✓ (714)540-2910 (714)982-2411 February 1, 1983 STAFF REPORT ARNOLD CIRCUITS' PERMIT REVOCATION Permit 3-135 STAFF ACTIONS A staff level permit revocation meeting is scheduled for February 10, 1983, with Arnold Circuits. It is expected that the result of this meeting will be a recommendation to the Board of Directors of District No. 3 at the March 9th Board Meeting to establish the date of April 13, 1983, for a public hearing to consider permit revocation. Permit revocation is being considered for the following reasons: 1. Arnold Circuits signed an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (E.C.S.A.) guaranteeing compliance with permit limitations by October 1, 1978. This deadline passed and compliance was not achieved. 2. Arnold Circuits signed a new Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (E.C.S.A.) guaranteeing compliance with permit limitations by October 1, 1980. This deadline passed and compliance was not achieved. 3. There is no evidence that Arnold Circuits can be expected to achieve compliance with the District permit requirements in the future. 4. The pH of Arnold Circuits' effluent has, at times, been recorded as low as 1.0, in direct violation of their pH limitations which are 6.0 to 12.0 and, consequently, has damaged publicly-owned sewerage facilities. (Note that the City of La Habra is expected to file a lawsuit against Arnold Circuits to recoup sewer repair costs.) 5. Arnold Circuits' effluent has created a public nuisance. "G" AGENDA ITEM. #9(K) - D I STP I CT 3 "G" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: CK Pump and Dewatering Corp. DATE_ January 13, 1983 MODIFICATIONS TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAINS AT BITTER POINT JOB: PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-25 Amount of this Change Order -(Add) (Deduct) $ 3,890.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. Elimination of Ductile Iron flanged joints on both sides of Pacific Coast Highway and subsitution of mechanical joints with U.S. Alloy tee bolts and nuts, elimination of 2-3/4' prefabricated Ductile Iron wedges with flanged ends, all per Contractor's request, for the lump sum deduction of $3,890.00 TOTAL DEDUCT: $3,890.00 2. The Contractor is granted a time extension of 78 calendar days for delivery of the eccentric plug valves. 78 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date August 5, 1982 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 12, 1982 Time Extension this C.O. 78 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 78 Calendar Days Original Contract Time 198 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 28, 1983 Original Contract Price $ 133,462.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 3,890.00 Amended Contract Price $ 129,572. 00 Board authorization date: February 9, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 By, 2/3/83 By 2/3/83 CK PUMP & DEWATERING Contractor Chief Engineer l,�l CORPORATION "H" AGENDA ITEM #9(L) - DISTRICT 5 "H" RESOLUTION NO. 83-20-7 WAIVING AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION EXCHANGE WITH OTHER AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES RE ANNEXATION NO. 99 TO DISTRICT NO. 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION EXCHANGE WITH OTHER AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES RE ANNEXATION NO. 99 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 8 of the California Legislature, 1979-80 Regular Session, provided, in part, for the implementation of Article XIIIA by enacting Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 95 through 100.5, inclusive, and further provided that prior to the effective date of certain jurisdictional changes, the governing bodies of all agencies whose service areas or service responsibilities would be altered by such change shall meet to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such affected agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said provisions the District has met and negotiated with the County of Orange to determine the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged between the District and agencies governed by the County Board of Supervisors for those areas located outside the jurisdiction of any sanitation district but within the tributary area; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors on June 9, 1982, approved the negotiated settlement with the County of Orange re tax exchanges on annexing properties, as recommended by the Select Committee re Negotiations for Tax Exchanges for New Annexations (AB 8) . NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, d.d DOES HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 7 "I-1" Section 1. That in accordance with the terms and conditions of the negotiated settlement with the County of Orange concerning tax exchanges on annexing properties, the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with .other affected taxing agencies for the following annexation: Annexation No. 99 - Shapiro Annexation to District No. 7 Section 2. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Local Agency Formation Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 7 11I-2" Page 1 of 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �.d CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE_ January 13, 1983 JOB: COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) -(Bedt2ct) $ 21,712.29 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. The Contractor is allowed additional construction costs for changes required to the siphon on 13th Street within the alley between Pacific Coast Highway and Walnut Avenue. Specifically, the Contractor is directed to reroute the siphon to minimize interference with 23 oil field utilities not shown on the Plans. Additional costs include removal of certain abandoned facilities, additional materials required for rerouting the siphon to avoid interference, and delays incurred by locating, removing and protecting utilities. All in accordance with Section 10-4-B(2) (b) of the General Provisions, for the lump sum amount of. . . . $ 6,926.29 2. Specifications require a 4-inch PVC flap on the sewer conduit lining for connection to adjacent pipe. Forty joints have been cast with a flap shorter than the minimum requirements of the Standard Specifications. The District will allow use of these joints provided the flaps are a minimum of 3 inches long. (If flaps are shorter than 3 inches, a PVC strip shall 'be welded at the factory prior to shipment.) The District proposes to replace a collector system included in the design plans by direct connection of city sewers to the Coast Trunk Sewer. The deletions would be made at unit bid prices. Fourteen new manhole openings will be provided for additional Coast Trunk manholes. It is agreed that the above changes will be accomplished at no additional cost to the District. $ 0.00 "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - DISTRICT 11 "J-1" ?aae 2 of 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE January 13, 1983 JOB: COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduc't) $ 21,712.29 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 3. Construction of the 14 additional manholes will require clean- outs for the City's sewer system. The Contractor will be paid for these Type A and Type B cleanouts as shown on Sheet 14 of 17 of the revised Plans at the following rates, when completed: 11 - 8" cleanouts @ $1015/cleanout = $11,165.00 3 - 10" cleanouts @ $1207/cleanout= $ 3,621.00 $14,786.00 TOTAL ADD: $21,712.29 4. The Contractor is granted a time extension of 10 calendar days for these changes. 10 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date June 10, 1982 Original Contract Time 330 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 5, 1983 Time Extension this C.O. 10 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 130 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 460 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date September 12, 1983 Original Contract Price $ 3,040,523. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 21,712.29 Amended Contract Price $ 3,062,235.29 Board authorization date: February 9, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By, 2/3/83 By 2/3/83 1..) STEVE BUBALO Contractor Chief Engineer CONSTRUCTION COMPANY "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - DISTRICT 11 "J-2" RESOLUTION NO. 83-21-11 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH SMITH-EMERY COMPANY FOR IN-PLANT PIPE TESTING SERVICES RE CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH SMITH-EMERY COMPANY FOR IN-PLANT PIPE TESTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-3, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, has heretofore entered into an agreement with Smith-Emery Company for in-plant pipe testing services in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed necessary to amend the agreement with Smith-Emery Company to provide for additional pipe testing services for said project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. that Addendum No. 1 dated to that certain Engineering Services Agreement dated June 9, 1982, by and between County Sanitation District No. 11 and Smith-Emery Company for in-plant pipe testing services required in connection with construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, providing for additional testing services for said project, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased for said additional work, on a per diem fee basis, from an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $19,236.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 11 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the \400/ General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. "K" AGENDA ITEM #T9(R) - DISTRICT 11 "K" RESOLUTION NO. 83-18 ESTABLISHING PER DIEM COMPENSATION POLICY FOR EMPLOYEES ON OUT-OF-COUNTY ASSIGNMENTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PER DIEM COMPENSATION POLICY FOR EMPLOYEES ON OUT- OF-COUNTY ASSIGNMENTS, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-50 WHEREAS, from time to time it is necessary for Districts' employees to travel outside the boundaries of Orange County on assignments on behalf of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have previously acted to authorize the General Manager to designate staff members to attend meetings, conferences, hearings and other functions within the State of California; and, WHEREAS, from time to time the Boards of Directors also authorize staff members to attend meetings, conferences, hearings, inspections, training sessions and other functions outside the State of California; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Districts and their employees to establish a uniform, equitable per diem compensation policy for employees when on such out-of-county assignments on behalf of the Districts and to simplify the accounting procedures for expense reimbursement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That per diem compensation in the amount of $40.00 per full day for meals, gratuities and incidental expenses incurred by Districts' employees when on overnight assignments outside the County of Orange, be, and is hereby, established. "L-1" AGENDA ITEM! #12(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" Section 2. That in the event an employee's out-of-county assignment includes only a portion of a day, then said employee shall be entitled to a proportionate amount of the per diem compensation hereinabove established in V.d Section 1 for the day as determined by the General Manager. Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, granted discretionary authority to increase or decrease the per diem compensation hereinabove established in Section 1 when circumstances warrant such an adjustment for specific assignments due to the nature or location of the assignment, or anticipated higher expenses because of such things as mandatory meals or incidental expenses associated with a meeting. Section 4. That Resolution No. 80-50 is hereby rescinded. Section 5. This policy shall become effective February 10, 1983. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #,f12(A) - ALL DISTRICTS ORDINANCE NO. 605 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 604 ESTABLISHING SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Section 402 of Ordinance No. 604 is hereby repealed. Section 2. Section 402 is hereby added to Ordinance No. 603 to read: 402 DISTRICT NO. 6 CONNECTION CHARGES 1. District Connection Charges No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant, provided, however, that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the reconnection or alteration of an existing connection for the same use made by the District or at the request of the District. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which established the use of said property. The following District connection charges are hereby established and shall be paid to the District or to an agency designated by the District: (a) Regular Connection Charge, Residential Uses. (1) Single family dwelling - $500.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Multiple dwellings - $500.00 per dwelling unit. A multiple dwelling is any structure designed or used for residential purposes, other than a motel or hotel, which would require -1- "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #,`28 - DISTRICT 6 "M-1" use zoning of a greater density than R-1 zone as R-1 is defined in the Orange County Zoning Code, Section 78.0214.1 through 78.0214.6 inclusive, if such zoning classification would be required to make the use of the subject property in conformity with applicable zoning standards of the County of Orange. (b) Regular Connection Charge, Commercial or Industrial Establishments - $100.00 per 1,000 square feet of improvements provided that such charge shall not be less than $500.00. The term "commercial or industrial establishments" as used herein shall include motels, hotels and property owned or occupied by governmental agencies and non-profit organizations. Section 3. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be Section 4. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held Chairman of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California -2- "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #28 - DISTRICT 6 11-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 February 1, 1983 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270- (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 STAFF REPORT V.A.L. CIRCUITS PERMIT REVOCATION PERMIT 1-348 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS It is the recommendation of Districts ' staff that the Board of Directors of District No. 1 revoke V.A .L. Circuits ' Industrial Waste Discharge Permit due to consistent violations of their Permit metal discharge limitations . BACKGROUND On June 1, 1980 , the Districts issued V.A.L. Circuits, located in District No. 1, an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit . Since that date the industry has continuously been under permit with the Districts . Between June 1980 and January 4, 1983, V.A.L. Circuits ' waste- water was monitored on thirty six separate occasions . Only one of these samples complied with Districts ' discharge limits . The critical metal involved is copper. Because of continued violation of the Districts ' pH limitations , a staff level permit revocation hearing was held on March 16, 1981. At this hearing, a Sample and Evaluation Program was scheduled to begin on March 30 , 1981. The results of the program were as follows : Limitation Lbs .' Over Non-Compliance Metal lbs . Limit Fees Copper . 5 33. 9 $1,017. 00 Because of V.A.L. Circuits ' inability to comply with Copper discharge limitations , District staff met with V.A.L. Circuits in April 1982 , and requested that the company enter into an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) with the Districts . Although the company initially agreed to sign the ECSA, they ultimately reneged on their promise . "PJ-1" AGENDA ITEM #31 - DISTRICT 1 "N-1" Staff Rep_ ort February 1, 1983 V.A.L. Circuits Permit Revocation page 2 On November 4 , 1982 , a staff level permit revocation hearing was held because of their continued violation of discharge limitations and their failure to sign the proposed ECSA and meet the proposed ECSA compliance schedule. At this hearing, V.A.L. Circuits promised full discharge compliance by November 19, 1982. However, sampling of their effluent discharge on December 1-2, 1982 and again on January 3-4 , 1983, indicated a continued non-compliance with copper discharge limitations. On January 12, 1983, District staff recommended to the Board of Directors of District No. 1 that permit revocation be considered at their meeting on February 9 ,: 1983- b.d "''!-2" AGENDA ITEM #'31 - DISTRICT 1 "N 2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 31 5, S, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .j MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JANUARY 12, 19003 A c� �•�aA C ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108U ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA .r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on January 12, 1983 at 7:30 p.m. , in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum `_. resent for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. l: X Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank Robert Luxembourger, Chairman pro tem Gordon Bricken X Don Saltarelli Richard Edgar X Roger Stanton Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 2: X Henry Wedaa, Chairman Ron McRoberts ` X Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr X Barbara Brown Ben Nielsen X Donald Holt Robert Kuznik Ron Isles Norma Hicks X Carol Kawanami William Odlum Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bob Perry Norman Culver X Don Smith Gene Beyer X Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: X Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Roland Edwards X Frank Laszlo, Chairman pro tem Willemke Vanderstaay X Marvin Adler Ben Nielsen X Norman Culver Bob Perry �d Henry Frese X Norma Seidel X Don Griffin James Jarrell Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken X Robert Mandic, Jr. Ruth Finley X Gerald Mullen Otto Lacayo X Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper X Charles Rell Frank Marshott X Earl Roget Dorothy Wedel X Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr X Charles Sylvia Kenneth Zommick X Harriett Wieder Bruce Nestande X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: X Evelyn Hart, Chairman John Cox X Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem Bill Agee X Thomas Riley Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: X Elvin Hutchison, Chairman Orma Crank X Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart _A_Roger Stanton Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 7: X Richard Edgar, Chairman Don Saltarelli X Don Smith, Chairman pro tern Gene Beyer Jacqueline Heather X Evelyn Hart Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran V.d X James Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: X Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister X Harriett Wieder, Chairman pro tem Bruce Nestande X Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister -2- 1/12/83 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Ray E. Lewis, William N. Clarke, Tom Dawes, Blake Anderson, Rita Brown Hilary Baker, Peggy Irrthum, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Mike Le Blanc, Don Winn, Pete Barotte, Jim Lough DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ' Receive and file excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the City of Newport Beach re election of mayor, and the appointment of Directors, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards. (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 5 Evelyn Hart* John C. Cox, Jr. 5 Philip Maurer Bill Agee 6 Ruthelyn Plummer Evelyn Hart* 7 Jacqueline Heather Evelyn Hart* DISTRICT 5 ' The Secretary declared nominations in order for Election of Chairman and Chairman the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem r " pro tem of the Board the Board of Directors of County Sanitation � District No. 5. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Philip Maurer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Maurer as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes r deemed approved as mailed. -3- 1/12/83 DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, d.d 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1982, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Holt briefly reviewed the Report of the Joint Chairman Districts' progress during the first six month of fiscal year 1983 regarding resolution of several key issues facing the Districts. Holt indicated that work on identification and implementation of acceptable sludge disposal methods is moving forward on several fronts. The Santa Ana Regional Water �..d Quality Control Board modified the County's landfill disposal requirements in December, 1982 to permit the direct burial of dewatered digested sludge. This modification has enabled the Districts to discontinue the composting operation at Coyote Canyon, which will both save money and reduce odor problems at the landfill. Additionally, the Districts are pursuing other programs, including completion of the LA/OMA sludge study, evaluation of co-combustion of solid waste and sludge, and scientific research into deep-ocean disposal of sludge, a joint Districts/NOAA project being performed by experts from the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) and Cal Tech. Chairman Holt updated the Directors on the status of the 301(h) secondary treatment waiver application. After a successful hearing before EPA Region IX and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in September, 1982, EPA Region IX is continuing to review the application, and we expect that EPA will approve the waiver in March, 1983. Approval of the waiver will save the Districts $100 million in additional construction costs and $3 million annually in operating costs. Holt indicated that engineering and environmental studies are in progress for the formation of District 13, which encompasses the northeastern portion of the Santa Ana Canyon drainage basin to the Orange County line. He also advised the Directors that he expected negotiations to commence in the near future regarding the Irvine Ranch Water District's request to join the Joint Administrative Organization through formation of District 14. The Joint Chairman reported that in November, 1982 the Joint Boards had approved a reasonable one-year salary and benefits package which had been negotiated with rad Districts' employees. -4- 1/12/83 Chairman Holt advised the Directors that construction of the advanced treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 was complete, and these facilities would soon be finally accepted by the Districts and placed into full service. Districts staff is also currently working to resolve one major claim by the prime contractor. Holt reported that the agreement specifying the terms of the settlement of property tax allocations for new annexations with the County Board of Supervisors has been prepared. He expected that the agreement would be executed within 30 days, at which time Districts 2 and 7 will receive approximately $350,000 from the County's Special Districts Augmentation Fund. Districts staff is moving forward to complete all pending annexations to these two Districts, and is also executing agreements with developers that will be included in the proposed District 13 service area so that construction can move ahead in these areas. Chairman Holt advised the Directors that the staff is preparing modifications to the Districts' industrial waste ordinance. These proposed modifications will further strengthen the effectiveness of the Districts industrial waste program, which is designed to prevent the discharge of toxics into the sewer system. The Joint Chairman reported that the Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee (FPC) and the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts recommended to the Boards of Districts 2, 3 and 11, and 1, 6 and 7 that they approve the recommendations contained in separate trunk sewer master plan engineering reports on these two sets of districts. These reports recommended consolidation of the sewage collection systems of Districts 2, 3 and 11 and a separate consolidation of the collection system in the northern half of District 6 with the systems in Districts 1 and 7. These recommendations were approved by the respective Boards of Directors, and the Boards directed the staff to proceed with implementation of these recommendations. These two committees are continuing to study the recommendations the Grand Jury's report on special districts, and will meet next month immediately before the Joint Boards meeting on February 9. Chairman Holt then called the Directors' attention to the following scheduled meetings: - District 7: Adjourned meeting on Wednesday, January 19, at 5:30 P.M. - District 6: Adjourned meeting on Tuesday, January 25, at 5:30 P.M. - Executive Committee: Meeting on Wednesday, January 26, at 5:30 P.M. ; Directors Barbara Brown and Don Griffin were invited to attend and participate in the meeting. - Fiscal Policy Committee and Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts: Joint meeting, Wednesday, February 9, at 5:00 P.M. , immediately preceding the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Joint Boards. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported briefly on the Report of the General Manager Districts' recent receipt of a highly favorable bid for a one-year contract for chlorine. The low bid of $129.00 per ton made by Continental Chemical Company is the lowest received by the Districts in nearly 25 years, and will save approximately $150,000 over the life of the contract. -5- 1/12/83 Mr. Harper called the Directors' attention to two supplemental agenda items. He indicated that the Districts had received 13 bids on Job No. P1-19-2 ranging from �.d $18,942.00 to $46,669.00 and that staff recommends award to the low bidder, A. F. Smith and Sons Construction Company. He also advised that the Districts had received 3 bids on Job P2-23-6-R1, and that staff was recommending award of the bid to Advanco Contructors, Inc., in the amount of $13,465.00. The General Manager added another item for the consideration of the Joint Boards that was received too late to include on the supplemental agenda listing. He advised that the staff had solicited proposals from several steel suppliers to provide steel for overflow box covers on 26 digesters. Fabrication and installation of these covers will help reduce another source of odor from Districts facilities, and the staff requested authorization to issue a purchase order to Ryerson Steel for $11,555.46 for fabrication of these covers. The General Manager reported that he expected Congressional committees to begin to review legislation applicable to the Districts in March, 1983. He also advised that the State Water Resources Control Board will soon be holding hearings on proposed modifications to the California Ocean Plan. These proposed modifications include a section on ocean disposal of sludge. The draft Ocean Plan also highlights the Districts'/NOAA funded sludge disposal research project, and suggests that the results of the project would be used to set state policy regarding ocean discharge of sludge. Mr. Harper advised that EPA and SWRCB had provided agencies with existing ocean waiver applications the opportunity to revise and resubmit an application if conditions had changed since their orginal submission date. Staff felt that the Districts' original application submitted in 1979 was still valid and did not submit a new application. The Districts expect a favorable decision on our application by March of this year. b.d ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefed the Directors on a Report of the General Counsel letter included in the agenda material regarding a recent amendment to the Political Reform Act which became effective January 1, 1983. The amendment applies to Directors' activities as members of the Boards when acting in a quasi-judicial capacity such as industrial waste permit revocation appeals. Mr. Woodruff asked the Directors to contact him should questions arise about the applicability of the legislation. ALL DISTRICTS Moved seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on Pages "A", "B" and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated: 12/01 82 12/15 82 12 29 82 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $204,293.92 $ 413,989.01 $161,783.11 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 64,461.05 421,034.86 139,186.21 Joint Working Capital Fund - 54,065.45 82,002.33 54,519.35 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 5,038.05 13,693.56 21,272.61 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- --- --- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,977.06 29,740.62 733.84 -6- 1/12/83 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 20.66 17,510.07 347.33 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 4,024.68 984.44 5,401.08 DISTRICT NO. 6 - --- 19.92 -- l--1 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 2,012.18 5,969.97 1,554.9T DISTRICT NO. 11 - 520.42 16,254.57 3,671.92 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 1,965.80 1,772.77 2,085.05 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 16.39 2,539.70 25.03 $338,395.66 $1,005,511.82 $390,580.49 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. J-4-2-1 specifications for Chlorination Facility Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2-1, authorizing an addition of $8,157.00 to the contract with The Waldinger Corporation for installation of rubber-lined spools and elbows between ejector and manifold and high pressure/low water sensing switches, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-098 specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, authorizing an addition of $38,520.00 to the contract with L & H Construction, a Joint Venture, for an additional 21,000 square feet of asphalt paving, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Specifica- tion No. C-012 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-11, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Supplying Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, to Continental Chemical Company in the amount of $129.00 per ton plus sales tax. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Hartge That the Selection Committee, be, and is Engineering Company re Job Nos. hereby, authorized to negotiate with I-2R and PW-099 Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job No. I-2R, and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099. -7- 1/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to solicit bids and authorizing General Manager to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized award purchase order contracts for to solicit bids for materials and materials, labor and equipment contractor-provided labor and equipment in accordance with established purchasing procedures for the following projects; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager, be, and is hereby, authorized to award purchase order contracts for contractor-provided labor and equipment in amounts not to exceed the maximums set forth below, and to procure materials and supplies required to accomplish said work: Contractor-Provided Specification Labor/Equipment Material Number Project Title Maximum Estimate M-006 Repair Foster Station Roof $ 19,000.00 $11,500.00 M-007 Fabricate and Install Additional Catwalks, Rothrock Station 28,500.00 17,100.00 M-008 Replace Grit Troughs, Pflanz Headworks 20,000.00 8,200.00 M-009 Replace Grit Troughs, lvw� "C" Headworks 26,000.00 16,500.00 M-010 Repair Stairs, "A" & "B" Digesters 14,000.00 5,700.00 M-011 Caulk Dome Edge, "A" Digester 9,200.00 5,500.00 $116,700.00 $64,500.00 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing rental of Districts' Pettibone Speed Mixer to Irvine That rental of Districts' Pettibone, Ranch Water District Model SM790, Speed Mixer, used for solids composting, to the Irvine Ranch Water District for a maximum of eight weeks, at the rate of $800 per week, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That all costs of maintenance and repair are to be borne by IRWD, and the first four weeks' rental are to apply to the purchase price if IRWD buys the unit from the Districts. -8- 1/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Autocon That staff, be, and is hereby, Industries, Inc. for purchase of authorized to issue a purchase order to a computer terminal to monitor Autocon Industries, Inc. in the amount Plant No. 2 operations of $31,200.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of an additional computer terminal to be installed at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Control Center to monitor Plant No. 2 operations. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 9605 That staff, be, and is hereby, to Carus Chemical Company re authorized to issue Change Order A to purchase of potassium permanganate Purchase Order No. 9605 to Carus and monthly rental of three Chemical Company for purchase of chemical feeders, Specification potassium permanganate and monthly No. P-047 rental of three chemical feeders, Specification P-047, for odor control at Plant No. 1, extending the rental period from six to twelve months for said feeders, and increasing the total amount from $55,000.00 to $57,000.00 plus tax and freight. (At the end of the rental period the chemical feeders become the property of the Districts) . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of memberships in CASA and AMSA for the 1983 That renewal of memberships in the calendar year California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1983 calendar year, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of annual dues of $1,650.00 and $4,781.00, respectively, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to attend a meeting with NOAA in That the General Manager, be, and is Seattle, Washington hereby, authorized to attend a meeting with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) relative to the Research Planning Study for Orange County Sludge Experiment re Ocean Disposal of Sludge to be held in Seattle, Washington, on February 2-4, 1983; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. -9- 1/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection \NNPI Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Len Scholl certification re negotiated fee with Len Co., Inc. for consulting services Scholl Co., Inc. for consulting services re the LA/OMA Project to assist the Districts with a public participation program required by EPA in connection with the completion of the Facilities Plan and EIS/EIR for the ultimate solids disposal facilities (LA/OMA Project) , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Len Scholl Co., Inc. for consulting That the Boards of Directors hereby services re completion of the adopt Resolution No. 83-1, approving Facilities Plan and EIS/EIR agreement with Len Scholl Co., Inc. for consulting services to assist the Districts with a public participation program required by EPA in connection with the completion of the Facilities Plan and EIS/EIR for the ultimate solids disposal facilities, for a total amount not to exceed $19,900.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying issuance of purchase order to Len Scholl Co., Inc. re That the action of staff in issuing Phase I services a purchase order to Len Scholl Co., Inc. in the amount of $9,950.00 for the initial phase (Phase I) of said study, as directed by the Selection Committee (This amount is included in total fee of $19,900.00) , be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Joint Chairman to appoint a Select Committee to That the Joint Chairman, be, and is advise staff re negotiations with hereby, authorized to appoint a Select the IRWD re formation of a new Committee to advise staff re Sanitation District and acquiring negotiations with the Irvine Ranch Water capacity in the joint works District relative to their request to form a new Sanitation District and acquire capacity in the joint works. Joint Chairman Holt then appointed himself, Joint Vice-Chairman Pattinson and Directors Don Roth, Don Saltarelli, Don Smith and Bill Vardoulis to the committee. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Declaring Job No. P2-23-6 opera- tionally complete That the Boards of Directors hereby declare Major Facilities for the 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, operationally complete as of January 12, 1983. \..' -10- 1/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file claim of H.C. Smith Construction Company That the claim submitted by H. C. Smith Construction Company, dated December 2, 1982, in the amount of $7,289,957.70 re contract modifications and 533 day extension of contract completion date, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and referred to staff and the General Counsel for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum That the Selection Committee, be, and is No. 6 to Agreement with Butier hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum Engineering, Inc. for Construction No. 6 to Agreement with Butier Management Services re Job Nos. Engineering, Inc. for Construction P2-23 and P2-24 Management Services re Job Nos. P2-23 and P2-24, providing for additional services to evaluate the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Select Committee appointed to advise staff re IRWD That the Select Committee appointed to negotiations to serve in an advise staff re IRWD negotiations, be, advisory capacity to the General and is hereby, authorized to serve in an Counsel and staff re claim of H. advisory capacity to the General C. Smith Counsel and staff re claim of H. C. Smith relative to Job No. P2-23-6. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Job No. P1-19-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Construction of Containment Facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-2, to A. F. Smith & Sons Construction Company in the amount of $18,942.00. A certified copy of the resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Job No. P2-23-6-R1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 83-12, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Additional Waste Activated Sludge Line Supports, Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6-R1, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $13,465.00. A certified copy of the resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim submitted by Arthur Perrone re That the claim submitted by Arthur alleged damages to his automobile Perrone dated January 4, 1983, in the caused by a District-owned vehicle amount of $110.00 for damages to his automobile caused by a District-owned vehicle, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, denied, and referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. -11- 1/12/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing issuance of purchase �d order to Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, That issuance of a purchase order to Inc. re fabrication of digester Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., in the overflow box frames and covers amount of $11,755.46, including tax, for the materials and fabrication of 26 digester overflow box frames and covers, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re non-compliance with Districts' That the Staff Report dated January 3, discharge permit requirements by 1983, re non-compliance with Districts' V.A.L. Circuits discharge permit requirements by V.A.L. Circuits, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing date and time for hearing on proposed revocation of That February 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m., be, Industrial Waste Discharge Permit and is hereby, established as the date issued to V.A.L. Circuits and time for a hearing on proposed revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 1-348 issued to V.A.L. Circuits on June 1, 1980, and authorizing the staff and General Counsel to proceed accordingly. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m. , January 12, 1983. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Shaller & Lohr, That the Boards of Directors hereby Inc. for engineering services to adopt Resolution No. 83-5, approving assist the staff re updating the Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with Trunk Sewer Master Plans for Shaller & Lohr, Inc. for engineering District No. 5 and the southern services to assist the staff re updating half of District No. 6 the Trunk Sewer Master Plans for District No. 5 and the southern half of District No. 6, providing for additional services re preparation of the updated Master Plan Report, on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $10,000.00, and increasing the total compensation from a lump sum of $12,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $22,500.00, said amount to be shared equally by the Districts. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: _Authorizing initiation of pro- ceedings re proposed Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby No. 11 - MWD Annexation adopts Resolution No. 83-6-5, authorizing initiation of proceedings to lgwr -12- 1/12/83 annex 2.437 acres of territory to the District in the Harbor Ridge area of the city of Newport Beach, Annexation No. 11, MWD Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m., January 12, 1983. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of .66 acres of territory to the Districts re That the Board of Directors hereby Annexation No. 37 - Chuchua Annex- adopts Resolution No. 83-3-2, ordering ation annexation of .66 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Wildan Road in the city of Anaheim, Annexation No. 37, Chuchua Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of .636 acres of territory to the District re That the Board of Directors hereby Annexation No. 40 - Wismer adopts Resolution No. 83-4-2, ordering Annexation annexation of .636 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Wildan Road in the city of Anaheim, Annexation No. 40, Wismer Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Referring verbal request of the Garden Grove Sanitary District to That the verbal request of the Garden delay collection of Districts' Grove Sanitary District to delay connection fee until the final collection of Districts' connection fee inspection is requested on a new until the final inspection is requested dwelling unit to the Executive on a new dwelling unit, be, and is Committee for review hereby, referred to the Executive Committee for review and recommendation. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other That the Board of Directors hereby affected taxing agencies re Annex- adopts Resolution No. 83-13-2, waiving ation No. 48 - Dyck Annexation No. ad valorem property tax allocation 1 and Annexation No. 49 - Dyck exchange with other affected taxing Annexation No. 2 agencies re Annexation No. 48, Dyck Annexation No. 1 and Annexation No. 49, Dyck Annexation No. 2 to County Sanitation District No. 2, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -13- 1/12/83 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m. , January 12, 1983. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., January 12, 1983. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 1983, at 5:30 p.m., for a status report on the proposed user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., January 12, 1983. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of 1.425 acres of territory to the District re That the Board of Directors hereby Annexation No. 90 - Everly adopts Resolution No. 83-7-7, ordering Annexation annexation of 1.425 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of San Juan and Catalina Streets in the city of Orange, Annexation No. 90, Everly Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution �.d is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering annexation of 1.677 acres of territory to the District re That the Board of Directors hereby Annexation No. 97 - Gimeno adopts Resolution No. 83-8-7, ordering Annexation annexation of 1.677 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Daniger Road and Crawford Canyon in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, Annexation No. 97, Gimeno Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby No. 116 adopts Resolution No. 83-9-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.39 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Lolita Street in the Orange Park Acres area, proposed Annexation No. 116 - Sibley Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. V -14- 1/12/83 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried: Introduction and first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 717, That Ordinance No. 717, An Ordinance of Amending Ordinance No. 716 the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 Amending Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety, be and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 717 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 717, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 Revising Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be introduced and passed to the second reading on January 19, 1983, at 5:30 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other That the Board of Directors hereby affected taxing agencies re adopts Resolution No. 83-14-7, waiving Annexation No. 100 - Hansen ad valorem property tax allocation Annexation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 100, Hansen Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. la.rJ DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to Wednesday, January 19, 1983, for a second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 717. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , January 12, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Revising Directors' Compensation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-10-11, revising Directors' Compensation. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Bailey requested that her vote in opposition to the resolution be made a matter of record. -15- 1/12/83 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:08 p.m. , January 12, 1983. Secretary, Board of Directors County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -16- FUND NO 511• - JT U157 1!OltntN': CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 11/24/t12 PAGE 1 __.. REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITAI ION III SIR ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIM:` PA11) 12/01/82 .._. WARRANT NO. VEMOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 661636 A-1 MURSF.RIES i77.43 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 061631 AEROVENT, INC. $115.83 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0E1632 AIP. .FRODUCTS &-CHEHICFLS,. INC, . ._.._. ____._ _ . _ S29.57-_._ _CYLINDER PARTS -•_ -- --- •- --- " GE.163Z ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $32.65 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061634 AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY $1,576.17 CHEMICALS 06163t AMER1CAh. SCI ENT IFI.C_F6ODUC IS_ . ..____.....---__ _... ..._ __.___1228-I4-_-.-_.____.---LAB SUPPLIES 061636 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $757.87 CSDOC #7 SEWER REPAIRS 061631 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S957.54 PUMP PARTS 06163,I AO11A IIFN CPNPe . 317,432,84_.....-- ._CHEMICAL-COAGULENTS - 0f1E39 DANK OF AMERICA NT 8 SA $39126.60 TRAVEL EXPENSES, VARIOUS MEETINGS Gf164il atL-ART PRODUCTS i390.40 LAB SUPPLIES i GE1641 OI .SOX PENT AL.-CO. .. .----.._- -- - - ._-- -.. _. . .31,661.00____ _-.-.. ..TRASH DISPOSAL - 061642 CITY OF BREA 1u44.00 CSDOC N2 MANHOLE REPAIRS 061643 3RENTWOOD PRODUCTS 151.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Ot•164 4 CS COMPANY- _ _ . ._. . _._.- ._.- .. - ---- 31.602.72-.-..--- -VALVES--- OE.1645 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY $79274.63 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 06If46 CALIFORNIA FANFL 9 VENEER $107.96 SMALL HARDWARE O61697 _. JfI!!N_9AROLLO ENGR.---P2-25-IA, -P2-24, P2-24-2, ENERGY TASK FORCE - 061E-4H JOIIN CAROLLO EN31 NEERS i11,379.46 ENGR. S YEAR MASTER PLAN, ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL 06164`.! CHARLES W. CARTER CO. $19832.35 PIPE SUPPLIES 061650 _-_ CACTLE_CONTROL.�.,_1NC..--_-- ----•---.-_.12.12.94_--.CONTROL-..EQUIPMENT.. 061E-51 CHAMIIER-MIX CONCRETE, INC. $496.24 BUILDING MATERIALS - 061652 CHESHIRE / A XEROX COMPANY $31.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9 061653 __ CHEVRON- U.S.A.,- .__36,704.8A --GASOLINE ENGINE OIL 061654 CONNELL CIIEVROLET - 341.11 TRUCK PARTS 061655 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $39673.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061656 CONTROL- SPECIALISTS. .INC. . ._ _ . ..___. __ . _ _. .. 142.7.0_-_-___-CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061657 CONTKOLCO $129.22 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 3616511 MR. CRANE $19107.00 CRANE RENTAL 0E165: CrIARLES_f. CROULEY._.CO.,_ ._------ __ ...._ 3T20-71--- _....PIPE -SUPPLIES _ 061660 CULLIGAN OFIONI2ED WATER SERVICE 621.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL UE1F6l CULVER NEULIN, INC. 1994.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 361662 DME, INC. 1471..70__.. .....__. . TRUCK PARTS " 061663 DALTO TOOL CO.. INC. 194.23 TOOLS GE1664 C.R. DAVIS SUPPLY CO. 149.3.96 HOSE SUPPLY Ofl(65_ _ _-_ CLLP_MI__SYSTEMS,.._INL._.-____.___ ------ 132.50_.---- --.-MINI--COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES " 061666 OEW-PAR SALES 8 SERVICE 169500.25 SMALL HARDWARE 061667 BUNN EDWARDS CORP. $78.86 PAINT SUPPLIES 66166F PIANf E.1GLI ----•------_,-- --_-_--.•- ---_5846.80 _-•_- RECEP-T--ION CST-_ _-•- _--- .. 0616E5 CASIMAN, INC. $19373.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 061670 ELECTRONIC. BALANCING CO. 1150.00 SCROLL BALANCING 061671 EU:HAN TER.. INC.. .__.-.-.--.--- . - .. ..__. ------- -_.__ _.130500.00 _._.--.-•--.00EAN-MONITORING 0F.1672 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $614.66 ENGINE PARTS 661673 kISCHER 4 I.ORTLR CO. $359.72 PIPE SUPPLIES 061671 F I SFIER CONTROLS CC. ..... 3R6.11.__....._._... -CONTROL EQUIPMENT --- -- OElE7; F1tiuFR SCIENTIFIC CO. $296.80 LAB SUPPLIES FOND NO Jr VIST WORKING_CAPITAL PROCESSIN:, DATE 11/24/82 F'A:�, e REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/al/82- . . _ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOJVT 3=SCRIPTION U61b7E FLO-SYSTEMS $575.37 PIPE SUPPLIES fi61E•77 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS• INC.. 1466.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061671'. FOUNTAIN VALLEYCAMERA ._. .. .... $3]0.4C _ ____._.____FILM-PROCESSING ••- ---_ Cf.1679 THE FOXUORO COHPA14Y $1.169.27 CONTROL EQUIPMENT Jf•lf.d0 GCA/PRECISIGN SCIENTIFIC GROUP $299.90 CONTROL EQUIPMENT QE1601 GANAI!L LVMBLR CA._..-- ----.---_-.___.__....---_._._.11.•.858.25..-- _-LUMBER --- ___.._ _ _ _ -_" 0E1662 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY $19167.09 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061693 GENERAL T:LLP!IONL CO- 4452.84 TELEPHONE 06T684 GOOPYLap ..HUPBER CO. b.l•379.30--.__SMALL-HARDWARE-• -•-- - ------' 061685 N.E. G4AY CO. S8,051.53 PIPE SUPPLIES "i 06168G HADCO INSTRUMENTS $95.93 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061607 ... LARPY.. HALL!S _.-_..____ _.__s74.-50- TRUCK REPAIRS 0616Fft! HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $271.94 PIPE SUPPLIES 0E16P9 HASTY ALIGNMENT $197.50 TRUCK PARTS 061690 110 17YWELL•_INC• - - _. _..___. ____.__.$395.2.0___.-_-,_ CONTROL-EQUIPMENT -__-- c61691 HOUSE OF BATTERIES i582.92 BATTERIES 061692 R.S. HUGHES CO.,, INC. 1593.43 PAINT SUPPLIES U61653. __. H�NI1NGlor1_SUPPLY,__----- ---�__-_- -- --_s.156.a4 SMALL-HARDWARE 061694 HYDROTEX S1.158.65 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061695 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $3.20 WATER USEAGE ., . fbILS(; .. ___ .--_.�ASK..X__CHaNGE___._...�_- -__._�___-_ -....._ 1-490..23-----.--EQU-IQMENT-REPAIRS- ••-- af.16y7 JONFS CHEMICALS. INC. $35,345.70 CHLORINE nE1651t KIMMERLE BROS.• INC. S?4.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES �C61F9�.. _ .__ _KING-BEAR ING•_INC. __._11.618.Ra -BEARING.-SUPPLIES -- .--- 1,1)061706 KLF.LN-LINE CORP -- $178.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -OF.1761 L&M TRUCK BODY 8 EQUIPMENT $225.57 TRUCK PARTS 061702 __. L. i._N ._UNIFORM-SUPPLY.SO- U-_._ -.__.________-_._._i9.332.9a • ..N.I FORM-.RENTAL 661703 L.I'•.W.S.• INC. $237.24 WELDING SUPPLIES 061709 LIGHTING DISTRIIJUTORS• INC. $137.45 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _ 061705 LITTLEJOPIN=RE�LANU_CO�P-. 1642-.D3_-_ -_-__ELECTRICAL-SUPPLIES---- 061706 M h M CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER $292.26 CERTIFIED COURT APPRAISAL 061707 MCCOOK PUMP $71.83 PUMP PARTS 06170U M�.LAUGHLIN .IND._O1STR.•. INC! __... _ _, il•320.A2.__._._.__ROPE- - ---- 061761, MCMASTER-EARN SUPPLY CO. $1.317•80 SMALL HARDWARE Of-1711) MEASURFOUIPMFNT• INC. $400.00 GEAR BOX 061711 `11L0.-iCULPMENT_.CORI'..--- ----•-.--- _..----------.-.-•---•--...__.__ .A1..520.13-_-----TRUCK -PARTS 061712 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO- $154.12 SAFETY SUPPLIES 661713 MOTOROLA• INC. $123.85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES QGM7 MYERS_TIRE SUFI'LY------ ------ -._ .-__--#6a9.1.0___TRUCK_TI.RES._- -- - -- - 061715 NASCO $85.46 SMALL HARDWARE 06171tb NALCO CHEMICAL CO. S49682.66 SOLVENTS 061717 _ PIAI I011A_L_1V Mil F.R_5UFPLx�..__.._ . . _ _._._____.___._.____1351.14- SMALL-HARDWARE-•-_ ...__._ __ __ 061718 NATIONAL SONICS 5468.90 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061719 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 542.13 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0G172P CITY OF .ryEWP.ORT 9CE�1l.__-•. ------S12. -7f -WATER-USEAGE --. -- 061721 OCEAN SALT CO.. INC. 1258.47 SALT FUND NO `!1?`.t . Jf L'I.ST :OLFING CAPIIAL _ PROCESSING DATE 11/2Sl82 fACE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _.. _ CLF_1MS. WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 061722 THE OHMART CORP 1.245.73 CONTROL EQUIPMENT C61723 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. 14013.46 VALVES 061724 1-164..111.----_SPEC-IAL.T-Y.-.GASES -..__.._ _ ---------•-_-... n61725 COUNTY OF ORANGE t119.77 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMINATIONS 0C172f. CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTRGLK $149390.90 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES 061727. . _ _._._._CQUNT.Y_SANITAT.ION...0.15.T.L11C7S-OF-ORANGE_.000NTY-.---$5s038.0S- RERLENI-SH-WORKERS!. COMP.- FUND - -----------" 116172k PPG INDUSTRIES. INC.. $516.43 PAINT SUPPLIES 06172%' PACIFIC ENGINEERS $249.39 PIPE SUPPLIES 06175ro pACiFIC SAFETY COVII'MENT CQ?. -_ . -_ _#28.96.._._- .. FIRST._AID_.SUPPLIES.-. Of.1731 FACIFIC TFLEFIiONE $325.23 TELEMETERING 06173= PARTS UNLIMITED $245.07 TRUCK PARTS ^61735 --.___._.._ PICKWICK _P.AF'EF__FHO.DUCTS._._-___. _.-. ___. __ __.._.___._. __...f•51L.G4 __-_ JANITORIAL--SUPPLIES ---- - -••" 061734 POSTMASTER E1rOJ0.G0 POSTAGE G61735 POWER DRIVES & CHAINS CO. $ItOI3.36 PIPE SUPPLIES 061736 RAIfJ0OW__DISFOSAL_COI..-._ _.-_.._.__ __---.___-__ S344e25_-....__ TRASH_DLSPOSAL --- --_--- OE-l731 RE-CY-KLEEN CORP. $70.42 TRUCK REPAIRS - V6173P GOI(DON E. REID 331200.00 PLANT 12 DRAFTING SERVICES 0617.34_ --._.____ 3EYNOLg.-.ALUhINUN---SUP_eLIL_C4.___ .- _`58-k.59 S_T-E.EL_STOCK.-.-.-.__ _-_...- . - - " 06174E THEODORE ROGINS FORD 39i145.68 TRUCK PARTS 061741 SA140 DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS 1434.60 OFFICE FORMS 061742-_ .--__._ 1161743 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS t2/673.32 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS _n61744 SEAL ENGINEERING CO. $259.59 PUMP PARTS W061745 _ . .___ _--._.SEE_Oil TICS -_..__--- __ -- --Y_- _.___-__._S91.uG____ -.-SAEET-Y_ GLASSES._.. .._... w061746 .HAMkOCK SUPPLY $39312.22 TOOLS 061747 SHEPHARU MACHINERY CO. $69296.31 TRUCK PARTS C6174e. SOUTII_90AST_OFF ICE._EGUIFMENT________-.__..___._.____ ___sfi/268.29 OFF.ICE..EURNITURE_ ._ . ._._ 061749 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 372,932.74 POWER 06175E SO. CAL. GAS CO. 122,t185.51 NATURAL GAS 0�1751__. SJ._.EALIF._WATLk_ CO...___.------- ------_-----._ .____ ._._...._.__ i_'0.66 --._WATER..USEAGE-..-._ 061752 SOUTHFkN COUNTIES OIL CO. 1320.12 DIESEL FUEL _ 061753 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $160.62 BOTTLED WATER 361754 Si ROW STEEL STEEL--STOC.K_. G61751 SUNSET LADDER CO. $38.62 TOOLS 661756 ThE SUf•PLIERS $19014.25 SMALL HARDWARE " 061751.._ __ ._.-_.TAYLOR_DUWN_.._-__.__-..-.__-___...__.___.-_--._.. .._ -.___136-7.66-------.ELECTRIC.-CART• PARTS 0617511 F.M. TIIOMAS AIR CONDITIONING, $312.00 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 061759 THORP•E. INSULATION t320.00 BUILDING MATERIALS 0617f G TRANSAKRICA 0[t4VALt_ INC*- ----- ------ - s32..90 _FREIGHT----. . -- --- ------ .161761 TRUCK E AUTO SUPPLY• INC. a372.63 TRUCK PARTS "I 061762 J-G. TUCKER & son/ INC. $111.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061763 - __ U.S.. AttIO_CLASSv__INC.._.__. 22-__. _TRUCK- REPAIRS.____._ . 061764 UNITkD PARCEL SERVICE $80.09 DELIVERY SERVICE GF-1765 UNIVI.RSITY SALE% P. SE14VICE $72.118 TRUCK PARTS ' 06176E Y:Jk :�CIEfI11F1C __._ b551.46...._._.__.-__.LAfl..SUPPLIES _._ ._ .._...._ GE1767 VALLEY CITIFS SUI'fLY CO. $240.71 PIPE SUPPLIES t.. FUND NO 91^5 - JT U1SF UORK1Nu.C1.F ITI'l, P40CESSIN3 DALE 11/24/82 PA3F 4 _.-_.. REPORT NUMBER AP13 COJINTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/01/82 _ WARRANT NO. VFNClOR AMOUNT DESC31PTION 0617bN VALVL 6 STEEL SUPPLY CO. $921.14 VALVES 061769 VALVE SERVICES, INC. $37.88 VALVES 66 177 1, VARE'C.. INC. .. S457902_...—.... .._—LAB•SURRLIES " 061771 VARIAN/INSTRUMENT DIVISION 1530000 LAO SUPPLIES G61772 VAPIAN INSTP.UME'NT GROUP $822.94 LAB MAINTENANCE 06177Z __._THE. WALDINGER. -J11,64.1.D0 —_—___,CONTRACTOR 1?1s19 .- .._- _ '• 061774 YESTCRN DIRE 9 ALLOYS 1125.61 WELDING SUPPLIES 061775 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP $401.06 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 0E.1776 W111TE, FINE..& VERVII•LE. .. .____ __ t9,9S9.52 ..— DEER-.-OCEAN-SLUDGE-DISPOSAL STUDY "I 061777 WYLE OISTRIbUTIONS GROUP S2?7.05 CONTROL EQUIPMENT OE177B XEROX CORP. $3,210.93 XEROX REPRODUCTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/01/82 E33B9395.65 -------------- - SUMMARY - --...-.-- N(� uuNT—• - ---- ,. - .19 OP€P F9"D #3 OPER FUND 20.66 #5 OPER FUND 4,024.68 y' 17 OPER FUND P N11 OPER FUND 520.42 #5E6 OPER FUND 1 ,965.80 11667 OPER FUND JT. OPER FUND 204,293.92 CORF 64,461 .05 SELF FUNDED.WORKERS:. COMP-INSURANCE-FUND __—_.___._.._-_ __._ ___. 5.,038.05._ JT. WORKING CAPITAL FUND 54,065.45 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/01/82 - ----..... __. .__. .._ _._._ ---- 5338;395:66 FUND NO `.'I'"a - JT C1S1 WORK INC CAPITAL FROCESSIN6 DATE PAGE 1 REPORT NUMVET AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY --- ---- C L h I M P A 1 D 1? 1 5 7 82 --- ----- --- WARRANT NO. VFNOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 061797 A-] NURSFRIFS 186.28 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES : 0617911 A01 ELECTRONICS+ INC. $59822.14 _CON T-ROL_EQU-LPMEN-T- 0617�J --1s0�ANCn COT15TCtUCTi1RS, INC. $869194.62 CONTRACTOR I-IR-I , RETENTION 1-IR-1 061000 AIR CALIFORNIA s217.00 AIR FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS i 061801 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CIIEMTCALS, INC. $7.20 D U RAGE ----7F;TR07---------_ ACLTE[T-f`TI''E- h--SU1=t'L4 1213.30 PIPE SUPPLIES 061803 1•F1Ltl]CAN DIGITAL SY ,'TFMS,INC. s59000.00 FLOW MONITOR INSTALLATION 061g04 ANERICAN DISTRICT TELEGPAPH s45.00 ALARM SYSTEM MAINTENANCE o: C?FTC-A�?�C)ENT IF IC PRCDUCTS i 3R.36 LAB MAINTENANCE 06180C, TIIE ANCHOR PACKING CO. i286.51 PUMP PARTS 1 061R07 AUL!A DEN CORP. 169024.90 CHEMICAL COAGUL_ENTS t7EDFAUTO ELE(TRTir�1hfC:--- ---- 1�3.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -- - C6180^ ASSOCIATED AIR FREIGHT- INC. s300.8P FREIGHT D61816 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE rROD., INC ig5.40 BUILDING MATERIALS -��TbiT-- ��To sow uIEF1T CO. $4, 97. 0 TRUCK PARTS 061812 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $48.68 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ? . 061813 9AKFR FLYWOOD CO., INC- s704.84 _ LUMBER - 06111 - l:+fCkMAN-TNFTRUNEFTS - S140.48 CONTROL EQUIPMENT GF181 JAVLS E'ENZIE $106.60 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 061A16 11IG BOX RENTAL CO. 319309.00 TRASH DISPOSAL ^6bTA7 �-w-S---ATV-CZNffTT-TONING 1253.19 TRUCK REPAIRS 0611118 bRISTOL FIPERLITE 1ND. $224.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061819 BUENA PARK LUMBER B HARDWARE i813.B7 SMALL HARDWARE Cp'05T82�---i7lliRt COF]CFiFTE-A�CC?�T:tFTE i1_0'�.24 BUILDING MATERIALS t0611421 C F R RECONDITIONING CO- s640.00 PUMP REPAIRS J -0F,1822 CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. 1573.6E WORD PROCESSING REPAIRS -'� T_r_(TMF-A N y R858.60 PIPE SUPPLIES 061824 CAL-CLASS FOR AFSEARCH, INC. $141.87 LAB SUPPLIES 061P25 CALTF• ASSOC. OF SAN. AGENCIES i120.00 CASA_ CONFERENCE REGISTRATION MAP_-CFNTCR--- E96.27 MAPS 06IP27 CARIIFNTTA FORD TRUCK SALTS. INC. $73.61 TRUCK PARTS 061P2R CAR((.`_' CHEMICAL CO., INC. 1926.00 F.EEpE"ENTAL _ OTiTH�9 Z`_krT?`-F'OW1 k_K__TcuTPT1 f N $87.24 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061P30 CHEIINEST INOUSTRIES, INC. $259800.19 FERROUS CHLORIDE 061831 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. 16*190.33 ENGINE OIL (f6fA32--- SRtAN C►1UCt+UAS JEFPI INC.-- -- - - --- - ------ -i87.11 ------ TRUCK PARTS -- - --- - •• 06183' CLAPK C•YF HARDWARE 1109.63 SMALL HARDWARE 061834 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $149.46 FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE aL�TF(33� Elb-A-Tff-fLECT--RIc =T 1. $$19907.44 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 061836 CUNTFOL SrECIALISTS. INC. $123.49 CONTROL EQUIPMENT I 061837 COOFFR ENERGY SERVICES i15,619.65 ENGINE PARTS _ --061E' ---- RR; LRAFTE ------ - 43_v5t;7_-lT1- CRANE RENTAL - 061639 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $35.00 CRANE RENTAL P61R4R C►IARLES F. CROWLEY CO. ODOR CONTROL T161841 I_ZTV__VTTl.. 9EkV-1CF9- -- EI63. 0--- RESIN TANK EXCHANGE, WATER SOFTENER RENTAL I 061642 O•L .T. CnNSTRUCTION, INC. $19594.89 RETENTION PW-091 FUND NO `+l`"; - JT TWIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/13/82 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 $ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAII) 12715182 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 061843 OME• INC. $900.71 ENGINE PARTS "1 061844 DALTO TOOL CO.. INC. S25.00 TOOL REPAIRS uEToqb DATA CIRCUITS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 061846 BEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $189.30 TRUCK PARTS 661847 DELPHI SYSTEMS• INC. $65600 MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES ,• ni1 `IICIRA�DTESEC-1ITJECTT 654.30 ENGINE REPAIRS 061849 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5173.42 PAINT SUPPLIES ;; (} 061850 DIANE EAGLE $345.15 RECEPTIONIST IRv • INC. S546:23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 061852 EMERY Alp FREIGHT $2.219124 FREIGHT � ) 061853 FILTRO COMPANY 3348.94 FILTERS --I* I Arp--W-PDRTF.R---CT1 - W36.51 PIPE SUPPLIES 061855 FI;IIER CONTROLS CO. S1.481.39 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061856 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $59. 7 LAB SUPPLIES S . 0 BUILDING MATERIALS 061056 FLO-SYSTEMS 1145.09 . PIPE SUPPLIES ) 061959 C. Mi FLORES RENTALS $8.984*00 3-21-1 REPAIRS So'T, 'CLTFFmTu-A—TOR KTIT 79 .75— E N G R. P 2-2 7 061861 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $3.744.39 COMPRESSOR PARTS ' 061862 FREDERICK PUMP B ENGINFERING 1770.62 PUMP PARTS i. TRUCK PARTS 061864 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES Coe S350490 PIPE SUPPLIES 061865 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY• INC- $26.00 LAB ANALYSIS ,. T=UET-A-6 L-- —FUk L I NJE1'TT>1T-nFt `- TRUCK PARTS ta061g67 CITY OF FULLERTON $11.68 WATER USEAGE -06186P GW MAINTENANCE• INC. $224.67 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES • m8r.9 GEMINI INLIUSTRTES $12078603 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 061870 GFNERAL TELEPHONE CO. 0i59$;17 TELEPHONE.- 061A71 M•E• GRAY CO. S563.17 PIPE SUPPLIES „ -0F1972-- —7ON-GITEE779-A�SCI-A' $198 9. 0 SURVEY 11-13-3 - 06107' H ? H RENTALS $56.39 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 061874 •He.K SALES $13.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TSTL1T'B`FIIIC6 • INC. $2 SMALL HARDWARE 061876 TED A. HAMMETT $7.824.56 COYOTE CANYON STORMWATER VACUUM TRUCKING 061877 MICHAEL HEINZ $36.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE _ • II6TR7 "-H t'TZ--CAR--TLASTFIG— - iti605.21 VEHICLE LEASING 061P79 HI-G CO.* INC. $103.00 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061880 HILTI• INC. %293.87 SMALL HARDWARE —1)61881 aTGriEND--AWTUK1TV • 29 .00 CONTRACTOR P2-25-IA 061882 HOLCHEM• INC. S4.403.40 CAUSTIC SODA 061883 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE $493.53 TRUCK TIRES OA TT-ER TES! 8 TTrRM 661885 CITY OF IIIINTINGTON PEACH $9.48 WATER USEAGE 0618116 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH S8.823.15 WARNER RELIEF II PAYMENT • TTA1;1 uN-ffrWCFI-RIIT Ur9-5-T71T1 1113.311 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0618PR HUNTIN6TON SUPPLY S168.99 SMALL HARDWARE •• . V n FUND NO 91Q9 - JT IIIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/13/82 PAGE 3 'I REPORT NUMBER AP43 c COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �. WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 061889 HYDROTFX $29941.24 LUBRICANTS 061R9C1 ISCO CoMrANY 1343.20 CONTROL EQUIPMENT $ 0 COMPRESSOR PARTS 061892 INGRAM PAPER $93049$ JANITORIAL SUPPLIES » �I 061893 )NMONT CORP. $10919682 USf CHARGE OVERPAYMENT TBa --TTTV7FI�RANt-H W =DISTRICT $3.20 WATER USEAGE 061895 IRVINE SWEEPING SERVICE $290.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 061896 PRYON JACKSON PUMP DIVISION $17.19 FREIGHT $103.05 TOOLS 061898 JONES CHEMICALS, INC4 $17082.22 CHLORINE l 061899 KELCO SALES B ENGINEERING CO. $29.32 COMPRESSOR PARTS 00 TNG9 INC. -sTf-T79755 BEARINGES 061901 KUIKSET DIVISION $39537.33 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT i 061902 L 3 H CONSTRUCTION+ J.V. $229635.00 CONTRACTOR 2-14-4R t-_T__ff_IIj!IIUUHM 3+31- UNIFORM RENTAL 061904 L.R.W.S.+ INC. $42.46 WELDING SUPPLIES 061905 LAURSEN COLOR LAB $139.92 FILM PROCESSING C-0_ELLU I li IC-C - , EL�FfR CT AL SUPP ES f.W 061907 LIGHTING DISTRIDUTORS+ INC. $436.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ` 06190P LINVPCRG $367.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CO. $39529o8O CHEMICALS 06191P THE CHARLES LOWE Co. $175.18 PUMP PARTS ► _061931 MANW)NG TECIINOLOGIES+ INC. $271.93 CONTROL EQUIPMENT tv 10-71- + PIPE SUPPLIES 1-2061911 HCCOUK PUMP $335.17 PUMP PARTS � 061914 MCFARLAND PARTITIONS $318.00 PARTITION INSTALLATION IUM PE 061916 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY. $129.15 SMALLS HARDWAREANGANATE 061917 MILLERS PRINTERY $123.49 PRINTING a6T9TlT-" lITE6 COUTFAT"NTCII TRUCK PARTS 06191r, MOTOPOLA+ INC. $960.36 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES , 06192C MYCO 1111)USTRIES $818.40 SMALL HARDWARE $7 .06 SMALL HARDWARE 061922 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR• $32.00 ZIP CODE DIRECTORIES 061923 NATIONAL SONICS $252.49 CONTROL EQUIPMENT » �0ST9g4 CITV_TIF-NIVFFDRT-8E-ACIi- Vi A T 1 V USEAGE 061925 NOTTINGHAM PACIFIC CO- $74.20 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 061926 OLE LEE. INC. $276.65 TRUCK REPAIRS TFYWR MM97T XUT CO. $141073 TRUCK PARTS 061928 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $192.25 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 061929 OXYGEN SERVICE S96.99 SPECIALTY GASES 1j'Fl9T_[- rTMNTY-,*NTTATTPry [TTSTPTrT5 -UF-"ARGE--CO'UNTT-- . EFLEM14-WURKERS' COHP.__FUNO 061931 fACIF1C SAFETY EQUIPMENT Co. , $36.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES 061932 PACIFIC TELEPHONE L123.46 TELEMETERING $049.50 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 061934 PhILADLLPHIA GEAR CORP 11 +979.02 ENGINE REPAIRS .v FUND NO 'Tin - JT UIcT WOPKING CAPITAL PROCESS]NO DATE 1211 SIP 2 PACE REPORT NUM3E4 AF43 COUNTY SANITATION OI!�TPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY t Pn 0�-9782 WARRANT 140. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 0619" 5 HAPOLD PRIMROSE ICE $27.00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE C6193! FEOTCCTO - FLASII, INC. $3092.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 6T937- -DU<TtiFUILDIFTG SUPPLY -- 1-,569.. 6 BUILDING MATERIALS 061938 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS $118.R8 TRUCK PARTS 061939 PAIN90W DISPOSAL CO- $309.25 TRASH DISPOSAL -7Tf9u---- -- R;C;D, `- S"T7fFi.6b DIRECTORIES 061941 REYNOLU ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. $706.91 STEEL STOCK C6194' POPRINS A MEYERS $29396.70 PUMP _PARTS 4 3-J-- iFTTj IV-�DM 1 TRUCK PARTS 061944 RUTI.AND TOOL & SUPPLY $1,177.64 TOOLS 061945 SF04f,, ROEBUCK & CO. $1,396.75 TOOLS „ -rtFI'74h -- - ---;::T•-:"SLRRWNTTNO-'---"-` - ---`-v�-3T; uu TRAINING SEMINAR REIMBURSEMENT '• 0F1947 S•1ILLCP 3 LOHR, INC. $1030.00 ENGR. 5-18R, CSDOC /15&6 MASTER PLAN UPDATES l 06194F SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4,559.80 TOOLS _ 6-7 'FFATTI-FtATRTR RY CO. 910.01 TRUCK PARTS 061950 A.H. SHIPKEY, INC. $851.65 TRUCK TIRES OE,1951 H.C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO. 5135,534.64 CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 ----.0�-552----` SOUTHERN-i ACTF-FOT�DN-L'Lf;- 13071-9 POWER 061Q5' SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 342,195.57 DIESEL FUEL 061954 -zrrr.CO - CHECK $92.86 TRUCK REPAIRS ' STEEL STOCK 061956 THE SUPPLIERS $602.52 SMALL HARDWARE i Z061957 SYORON - CASTLE $180.00 LAB MAINTENANCE �DE;T`156 IYAi'-sYESTE tV $1,558.11 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT :m61°59 TAK TAKAMINE $408.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 061960 IAYLOP-OUNN $376.19 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 061961 TtRkYwS UPHOLSTERY $180.00 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 061962 F.M. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING 1401.14 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 061963 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. 1652.21 PAINT SUPPLIES -----C6I934,---_T°-AFFTT- DNTRUC-SERUE'E, INC. �$475:66 SAFETY SUPPLIES 961969 TROJAN BATTERIES $71896 TRUCK BATTERIES 061966 TRUCK R AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $29133.23 TRUCK PARTS 9T7�--'-BTU K & SON, 109000.71 GAS DETECTORS AND MISC. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06196S U.S. AUTO CLASS. INC. $209.22 TRUCK REPAIRS •• 061969 UNDERWOOD SERVICES ASSOC. S11030.85 AUDIO_E_QUIPMENT •• •• - 0 --- IFN1 F. - ---`-SA5.62 GASOLINE 0E1971 UNITED PAPCEL SERVICE $47.83 DELIVERY SERVICE 061972 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR COPP. $700.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 06197T UNIYEO MIES COUTPRENT CD., INC. $297.68 COMPRESSOR PARTS 061974 UNIVERSITY SALES & SERVICE $52.50 TRUCK PARTS 061975 VUR SCIENTIFIC $1071.70 LAB SUPPLIES .. -`9FI`T7;- ---v&rE Y-j7lTT-S-`uF rCY-Cr: I�?-f:5 - PT PE SUNFIT E 061977 VALVE R STEEL SUPPLY CO. 1637.69 VALVES 06197N VAF )AN/]NSTRLIMFNI DIVISION 1192.12 CONTROL EQUIPMENT -- V`�T TTICAT IITD73?TA ITU-Fr TPT-o- -- TTO-075 0 SMALL HARDWARE 06198( 1HE WALDINGFR CORP. $1,789.15 CONTRACTOR PI-0 FUND I:Cr i''1 - ,ii .:I'-1 1..i•FKINC Cil Ili1. "S!N's Cri• I /1 .'Jt;^ f{i!I"I't . 11i.11frh' .il fI:ICT.i OF 1;I:ANGE CJUWTY I' CLAIM`- f-nlf, 1?/15/82 WARRINT NA. VJ NGOF :110UNT pF.SCaIaTInN 11CIt-bI dw;ll i- . tlkfLC.. h455.2J ODOR CONSULTING 01:1`4L, i L,144.7a i.. __ --- .. -. ____ PIPE.,SUPPLIES Os l'lN_ ,6llKf -lia �.I:GILI� <'F. - ----- R�ILENTEI: 9.3�6.33 ENGINE PARTS !'I fbIt-e4 I1r.;TERP1 CLECTRONIC £Uf•F'LY Col-F 1446.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ..I 2f,1911 .:f::11N!AH0l1_F ELECTRIC COFf s44.n7 ELECT ICAL SUPPLIES - fcl`.+f1� 1-(.;�_• L. LEGAL SERVICES Ij •. ... .,.Sti XEROX REPRODUCTION ! -------------- TOTAL fLA115` PA11, 11/15/1e2 110t105.511.fi2 i i . _. . .... .SUMMARY ..... . AMQUNT MWER FUND -.. -- --.. - - - - _.. - -.._.. . -- --�- 26,Z6b..4G___ __ _ •' N2 ACO FUND 2,975.66 ______ #3 OPER FUND '.17,510.07 .15__OFER. FUND 804 4 I N5 ACO FUND 180.00 �.I #6 OPER FUND 19.92 N7 OPER FOND . . . ------ -- -- --- - ------- --- _3,469.27— D7 ACO FUND 2,500.00 (III OPER FUND 4,6o3.22 " - NI I AGO FUNQ - - -- -- - - ----...__-_ _- ---- .— - --- -2,828l00---- N #11 F/R FUND 8.823.35 i N566 OPER FUND 22.77 #566 SUSPENSE FUND _ ry6s7 OPER FUND 2.539.70 JT OPER FUND 413,989.01 i ._---.-CORE _.. .. .. _.._ ..- -- _ _ _.._.__... +►21_.036 LBb--- SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 228.30 I SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 13,465.26 _ JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND _.82,002,33 __.___._.. 'i TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/15/82 $1 ,005,511 .82 -1 i FUND NO ( .99 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATL 12/27/82 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMOER AP43 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/29/82 WARRANT- NO. VENDOR AMOU,yT DESCRIPTION- I' 062041 ACME- WIRE-CANNER PRODUCTS $19521.65 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT • 062042 ACTION INSTRUMENTS, INC. - . $Io l81.51 - _ CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062043 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALS, INC. $259.44 SOLVENTS • 062044 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $106.01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0¢2 off 5 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS __-LAB SUPPLIES- _ - - ------------ -------_-__--..- �'' 062046 ALALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS $539.57 CONTROL EQUIPMENT i,• OE2047 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S117.66 PUMP PARTS �• 962048 _ AQUA _CHEMICAL- - BFN CORP _--- -----_____ _. .--.._12#.5tl9,_7-4_-_-.-- _COAGULENTS_ _ �. 062019 ASHBROOK - SIMON - HARTLEY $29335.96 SMALL HARDWARE 062050 B 8 J APPLIANCE SALES $19389.82 APPLIANCES • 062051 BACHARACII INST. CO. __- -.-. . ._._._._1.5#QO..-.._ -.-___CONTROL__EQUIPMENT 062052 BANK OF AMERICA Ni B SA $592.72 TRAVEL EXPENSES, VARIOUS MEETINGS 062053 dASSETT BUSINESS INTERIORS $485.06 OFFICE FURNITURE `••I C62054 BATTELLE _.SEMINARS & STUDIES _ -.. _-.-_ __ $295�00- _--_.PUBLICATION - "! 062055 BECKER PUMP B ENGINEERING CO. $365.70 PUMP PARTS 062056 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $415.24 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062057 L.W. t3E_M_IS TRACTOR 8 IMPLEMENT i31.12 _ _-_-_-TRUCK PARTS._. 06205i, BIFRLY B ASSOCIATES# INC. $550.00 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR C62C59 BRLNNER-FIELDER B ASSOC.* INC. $056.82 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062C60 ._-BUPKE _CONCRETE-.ACC€SSORIES.-_ 062061 BUTTER ENGINEERING, INC. $53*475.69 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-23, P2-24, P2-25-IA 062062 C & R RECONDITIONING CO. $410.30 PUMP REPAIRS ' __.- -----062063 CPT--CALIF ORNLAt_.Il�C-'-- --- --------- -sI,7_70__t 9 -WORD-PROCESSING_ SUPPLIES-_ 0620E4 CS COMPANY $74.83 PIPE SUPPLIES 062665 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. $33.10 LAB SUPPLIES ;06.2066 __. __.___ .CALIF!.ASSQC19T.1QN__4!-eU@L.IC _ _.-_..-_ ____1125-00___-.-PURCHASING AGENT CONFERENCE REGISTRATION --- -• �_062067 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC $1,014.68 TRUCK REPAIRS :062068 R.T. CAMPBELL CO. $94.64 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _--- 062069 CARME ---NITA FORD--TRUCK--SAGISt_1N..._._.-----..__._..-..-------__Ie1811_,-30_- TRUCK_PARTS ....- ..__.------------.,... .... .........._.___.... _...__. 06207E JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEFRS 14,324.24 ENGR. P2-24, P2-25-1A: ENGR. ENERGY TASK FORCE 062071 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINFERS $119578.60 ENGR. P2-27, ENGR. 5 YEAR MASTER PLAN (.62072. _- .. JOHN -C.AROLLO.EN6/GREELEY. IIANSEN -- -------------- ----12Z,67.0.28- -P2=2.3=6-TRAINING---- -- ----- . --- - --- -. "� 062073 CHEMW£ST INDUSTRIES, INC. 1179112.22 CHEMICALS, ODOR CONTROL 062074 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. 516,219.09 GASOLINE COAST SWEEPING, INC,- -- _ _.__ ._ ------ -.----_ _3380.00-----PLANT- MAINTENANCE--.----- -- 062075 ___ 062076 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $29951.47 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062077 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS $761.15 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION __CONTROL_SPEC IALI.S.TS,__INC.---_--_.--__T.-- --------1i1.56...35-__ CONTROL-EQUIPMENT------- --- - ..- ------ ---- -_._._----- -_ ._ .. . _ 062079 CORNIER-DELILLO CHEVROLET 527.23 TRUCK PARTS 062080 MR. CRANE $914.00 CRANE RENTAL CRANE VEYOR CORP.--- ---------------_- -- $29.34 LHANE-HENTAI-___---__-_---.-.----------._._----..---- ' 062062 CULLIGAN DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE 5126.98 RESIN TANK EXCHANGE 662683 DME, INC. S559.45 TRUCK PARTS •. -------Lh2084 ____ --- ..--DANIf-LS__LIRE_.SER_Y ICE i-_- ---------- -- --1134.61-- TRUCK_T.IRES.-------- --- --- - - -._ __ ._...- ---_--- -.. 062085 OECD $203.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062086 DEW-PAR SALES 8 SERVICE S3,664.26 SMALL HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/27/f+2 PAGE 2 �•' RFPORT NUMBE4 AP43 flu t COUNTY SANIIATION.RISTRICTS OF.. ORANGE COUNTY.._. _ ---------___-.._. CLAIMS PAID 12/29/82 M.RANT. NO:._. _ _._. VENUOR . ._.__. _._ ._. AMOUNT..- --_-_-- _-- -----..__._.._-D.ESCR1!T.I.ON._-- - .----------- -------------..---- 062087 DORADO ENTERPRISES• INC. 13.053.80 SANDBLASTING - 062Pee - .-.. QUNN EPWAR11s tpftRt. __ _ $al6.n2 .-- - PAINT..SUPPLIES - 062089 DIANE EAGLE $47.20 RECEPTIONIST OC2090 THE EARL#S PLUMDING9 INC. $283.71 PIPE SUPPLIES W991 _ _ _. ._ EA5THA11 . INC• . .. -_..__ _ .. ._ .._.h2.305.50-----------OFF.ICE._SUPPLIES------.----.. 062092 ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 1163.71 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 062093 ENCHANTER, INC. S39500.00 OCEAN MONITORING • .__. ..._�6�459 F1scIlE!i .� pop EB.&o: __.._..-_....__ . ------___.-t252.59_-... PIPE-SUPPLIES -- _ .... .. .. 06269 . FISHER CONTROLS CO. $84.36 CONTROL EQUIPMENT �.. 062096 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $115.18 LAB SUPPLIES I • 062097 FLAT B VERTICAL CONCRETE _ - - ._ -_- _. .•_-•__S22Q:.04 --BUI•LDING-MATERIALS-.-- 662698 FLEETWASII SYSTEMS• INC. $19710.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 062099 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY• INC. $26.00 LAB ANALYSIS 062101 GW MAINTENANCE• INC. $272.62 SMALL HARDWARE :.I p62102 GEM-O� LITE PLASTICS CORP. $33.17 SMALL HARDWARE $679A30 062103 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO: _ ----- -TELERHONE-------- 1T62104 GORDON�S• INC. - - $146.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 062105 M.E. GRAY CO. $19137.86 PIPE SUPPLIES -----0621�6 .__ HALSTE.Q__$ .HOGGAN LICs �42.@4 -----s- - --_._._------------------ ELECTRICAL SURRLIES--._. ._._._.__ .. - -•-- ----..._....-----. _..__... . 062107 TEO A. HAMMETT $59452.00 COYOTE CANYON RAINWATER VACUUM TRUCKING 062100 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACI4 110.29 WATER USEAGE 962105 __•___-_-_.- NUNTINGTON._BEACH RUBBER S.I�P___---_.____ - - - - 062116 HU NTINGTON SUPPLY $64.17 SMALL HARDWARE 062111 ISCO COMPANY $19.03 CONTROL EQUIPMENT • =062112 - --- INGRAM-PAPER--_ -- _-...-_- ----- ------___--$2@fl�5�- JANLTORLAL._SUPPLIES----.--------.----_-------.- N 062113 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO- $89.32 TRUCK PARTS =062114 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $282.04 WATER USEAGE 062115 - -- - J.T. .JENKIMS- CO.. - --- - --- ..-. .. -- -- --- - - - I@1t5@--TRUC"ARTS 062116 JENSEN TOOLS B ALLOYS $325.00 TOOLS • 062117 JONES CHEMICALS. INC. $99788.04 CHLORINE _._..06211 H -- .--. __BEARING-SUP_PLI 062119 KING BEARINGS INC. S723.95 BEARING SUPPLIES 062120 KLEEN-LINE CORP $867.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES • 062121 __ - _ L.fS.W.S.t INC.._. .__ _._.-_ ._. .--- _ ....----.-.-.---- ----._.._._I!1.526.9`1------.WELD.ING-SUPPLLES_.__.___. . -------_--•-- 062122 LANE FOREST ELECTRIC VEHICLES $48.25 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 062123 LIGIITING DISTRIBUTORS9 INC- $425.64 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0621211 .. _..MACK_ TRUCKS! _INC.._ . ___....---.---------_-.. -. .. .----h24,B1_------TRUCK .PARTS 062125 MARTIN LUTHER HOSPITAL $60671.81 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 062126 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS 119040.32 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062127 MCFARLAND PARTITIONS 0621211 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $32.75 - -- -- - - ----- SHALL HARDWARE 062129 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $8.64 WATER USEAGE •• __ ..- . 0621311 ._.. _ METER_,HASIERi INC .__-- 062131 MILLERS PRINTERY S44.84 PRINTING 062132 MILD EQUIPMENT COhP. $19628.16 TRUCK PARTS C .. • FUND NO .1)9 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/27/H2 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. OF .ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/29/82 WARRANT N. O. VENDOR AMOUNT . . .. . - DESCRIPTION 062133 J. ARThUR MOORF., CA, INC. $559.80 CONTROL EQUIPMENT • _..... 062134.___. NATIONAL ,LUMPIER SUPPLY._ �163:63. --•---. .__ SMALL -HARDWARE .---- U62135 NATIONAL BONICS 1252.87 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 662136 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $91.01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES • _,.. - --_062137. ..... .... ... O.T.S.•.DI,STRIBUTORS...__.......____ ..._. ......----,.P-LUMDING_SUPPLIES--.._-- ____---.___._._-------.------_ 062130 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $422.09 TRUCK PARTS 062139 OXYGEN SERVICE $424.00 LAB SUPPLIES • _-__-062140----._-_,_-_-•._CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROL(. ___-____-_V____.II?A!52:Q4 --COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES-.-_ , 062141 C.S.O.O.C. SELF-FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE $209000.00 SELF FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE DEPOSIT I062142 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY $337.61 � REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND •• • 062143 PACIFIC PUMPING CO. _ _ 1._._.-f�t091.eg -pU),P_.PARTS_--..--.-- ____._ -._____. .--_._ - 062144 PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC CO. $147.80 LAB SUPPLIES On2145 PACIFIC TELEFIIONE $386962 TELEMETERING . .. .. .__. 061. 214b.-,-._. ._ PPB.TS_.yNL1+4ITEL�. ._...__-. ------_..--_-.-------...__ .____ IP564.10 _TRU.CK. PARTS .. Ob2147 PHILADELPHIA GEAR CORP $109573.50 GEAR PARTS 06214P. PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $19298#32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES GE.2149 PITTSBURG TESTING LABS__... --•_-•- __..S4-g5.Q4______-e2_.2h_2_TE.ST-INS _--•- -.---------------------- C62150 PORTER BOILER SERVICE, INC. $325.00 TRUCK PARTS 062151 FORTER INSTRUMENT CO., INC. $809.00 CONTROL EQUIPMENT •• --- 062152 - -_ PRINTEC._COHP._ _-....__.._� -----��L9Iz`W6_ ._----.____-----__ -._.------__- . 062155 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS $23.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 062151 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. OF CALIF. , INC. $740#24 VALVE SUPPLIES _-- 062155...___ ...__....--_ROBHINS- B--ME•YERS _ ---•---..-__ _ _--_.._112+132.53 -QSIM"ABT.S__-------- _-- -.-..------_-._._ 062156 RO©ERTSMAW CONTROLS CO. $337.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062157 RODDING CLEANING MACHINES, INC $655.00 CSDOC #5 SEWER INSPECTION .. _ ,_.,46215I1 �--- _....-._�•9•D•___r11FE,__If!!i, _-_-- -.-- .T;913..D0 CDNTBOL_EQULPMEHL-..- --__.._.---__-.-. _ -- _-_-- .-- . . .. W 062159 SCM WALTON PRINTING CO. $188089 OFFICE SUPPLIES =062161i SANCON INC. $29750.00 2EBRON COATING P2-24 .. _ . 082161 .___ _._.. 500.DOLLAR. RUSINESS_EO.RNS__.__....----.-.__-----._._.-.--------.-f.12Z.2D-_�.__-9FF.LEE 062162 SANTA ANA DODGE 5494.05 TRUCK PARTS 062163 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. $31286.60 LAB SUPPLIES _,... f162165 062165 SEACOAST ENTERPRISES, INC. $164.00 SMALL HARDWARE 0621r.6 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $29940.66 TOOLS 062167- SHCQHARD_MAC"INLRY_,CO:_--- ---__-- 662168 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2,765.00 TESTING 11-13-3 062169 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $14.86 TOOLS 062I70.-__. .- __... .._SOFIWA.RE._.STORE---- 062171 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $1932.2.51 OFFICE FURNITURE 062172 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT $199781.00 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY • ..-`---. -062173__._. __.__....SOUTIiERN-_CALIF. _EDISON CO. lltgZQ.13 POWER 062174 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $319045040 NATURAL GAS - - - - 062175 SO. CALIF• WATER C.O. $26.02 WATER USEAGE •. --__ 06217fi_._._ ._----. _._S9UTI±E8N. COUNTIES_O_IL_Ci1.-.� 062177 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 1651.15 BOTTLED WATER 062178 THE SUPPLIERS $19171.74 TOOLS FUND NO 91'19 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1?/27/82 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF.. ORANGE COUNTY _ CLAIMS PAID 12/29/82 WARRANT. No• YENp4R . AMOUNT_ .. _ .. _--- ._-... DESCRIP.TION- 062179 TAK TAKAMINE S200.00 GROUND MAINTENANCE 6621b0 F.M. TIIQMAS AIR CONRITIONING SloU92.71_._ _ _ __ AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE .- _ 062181 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. S83.49 PAINT SUPPLIES �.. 062182 TNOMPSON TANK 9 MFG. CO.• INC. S747.35 SMALL HARDWARE • 0621R3 . TONY05 LOCK & SAFE .SE.RVICE _. 5816.94__.._-_-- ---.LOCK E_KEYS_ _.. ._.__ ._.__..._.__ .....__ ' G62104 TRANSAMERICA DI-LAVAL• INC. S1*305.92 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062185 TRANSMATION• INC. $49.55 CONTROL EQUIPMENT • L62106. _ _. _ _.TRAVEL BUFFS __--_--_--_.__ _.__ ___.___. ._. .. .___ __ _ 5199.0�--_—_AIR-FARE, VARIOUS MEETINGS 062lb7 TROJAN BATTERIES $230.60 TRUCK BATTERIES I..� 06218b TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY• INC. $1.142.33 TRUCK PARTS � I 662189 TRUESDAIL LABS $ 66-2196 J.G. TUCKER 8 SON, INC. 1301.94 PUMP PARTS 062191 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $86.40 DELIVERY SERVICE 062192 .. _ VNR .SC.I€NTIfIC. SUPPLIES—. _ -----___-. __. •. .. _.__._ . 062193 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $228.39 PIPE SUPPLIES � I 062194 VALVE E STEEL SUPPLY CO. $508.43 VALVES • .. 94?195 WALTER$ ENGIN€ERING__CO•. 06219E WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $422.00 ENGINE PARTS 062197 R.V. WEATHERFORD CO. $375.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES � •� ' 0 6219 8. .....AESTEPN_MEOICAL. CEN.iER _ ---. ._. ------•-_--.__.__ _.----.._.t6eZ95..2U USE-CHARGE-OVERP.AYMENT- 062199 THOMAS L. WOODRUFF $5.819.00 LEGAL SERVICES DE2200 XEROX CORP. $143.10 XEROX SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/29/82 $390*560.49 SUMMARY AMOUNT a2 OPER FUND S 733.84 B3 OPER FUND 347.33 - /5 OPER FUND ... - - -- — -- — __...-- - --- — ---4..702.47_------- - -- -- — - --- .. d5 ACO FUND 655.00 15 F/R FUND 43.61 #7 OPER FUND #11 OPER FUND 841 . 12 #11 ACO FUND 2,830.80 B5E6 OPER FUND - - - --.._._. ... - -.._.. _ — ---._ _. . . ----29085,05------ -- --- __ _ N667 OPER FUND 25.03 JT OPER FUND 161 .783. 11 CORE - -- - — —139,186-2.1 - SELF FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 20,000.00 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 385.00 -- ---- SELF FUNDED WORKERS! COMP..-- INSURANCE._.FUND_..__ _.._._._- _.._._. _.___- 887..61---- JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 54.519.35 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/29/82 $390.580-.49- ------ --------- - - -- - -- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 6 14 540-2910 IIAGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS FEBRUARY 9, 1983 - 7 :30 P . M. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 (5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Brea regarding appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 2 Sam Cooper Norma A. Hicks* 3 Carrey J. Nelson Sam Cooper ALL DISTRICTS (16) (a) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification re final negotiated fee with Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job Nos. I-2R-1 (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) and I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099. See page "I" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-16, approving agreement with Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job Nos. I-2R-1 (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) and I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, for a lump sum of $63,750.00. See page "II" (Item #16 continued on page 2) (16) (b) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to analyze the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company in connection with Job No. P2-23-6. See page "III" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 83-17, approving Addendum No. 6 to the Construction Management Services Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. re Job Nos. P2-23 & P2-24, providing for additional services to analyze the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6, on a cost plus fixed-fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $112,000.00, (increases maximum total compensation from $1,597,225.00 to $1,709,225.00) , and providing for an extension of the terms of said agreement from January 31, 1983, to September 30, 1983. See page "IV" (c) Consideration of motion amending the Board action of November 10, 1982, authorizing the staff to issue purchase orders, as required, for vacuum trucking of 1982-83 stormwater runoff at the Coyote Canyon sludge processing site, increasing the total amount from an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS hr' Q TELEPHONER: Q �� AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 8b 962- 'i P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 9, 1983 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates. In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engi- neering services, the Selection Committee has reviewed and approved the proposal and a lump sum fee not to exceed $63,750.00 for Hartge Engineering Corporation for engineering services in connection with the design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Job No. I-2R, and Rehabili-tation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099. The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Donald A. Holt, Jr., Chairman Ron Pattinson, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Selection Committee Approved: Fred A. Harper, General Manager "I" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I" } RESOLUTION NO. 83-16 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH HARTGE ENGINEERING COMPANY RE DESIGN OF JOBS NOS. I-2R AND PW-099 `.d A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH HARTGE ENGINEERING COMPANY FOR DESIGN OF REHABILITATION OF BUSHARD TRUNK FROM PLANT NO. 2 "C" HEADWORKS TO ELLIS AVENUE, JOBS NOS. I-2R-1, I-2R-2 & I-2R-3, AND REHABILITATION OF PLANT NO. 2 "C" HEADWORKS INFLUENT METER GATES, JOB NO. PW-099 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Jobs Nos. I-2R-1, V.d I-2R-2 and I-2R-3, and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated February 9, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County and Hartge Engineering Company for design of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Jobs Nos. I-2R-1 `..✓ (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) and I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Plant "II-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, is hereby approved and accepted; and, `•+' Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum amount of $63,750.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. �vd "II-2" AGENDA ITEM #-16(A) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "II-2" i ' ytyzroN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o !J TELEPHONES: j ' o AREA COOS 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 411 II P. O. BOX a127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9270E lOE44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY) February 9, 1983 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 6 to Construction Management Services Agreement for Construction Claim Evaluation for 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2 In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engi- neering services, the Selection Committee, as directed by the Joint Boards of Directors pursuant to minute action of January 12, 1983, has negotiated the following fee with Butier Engineering, Incorporated, for construction claim evaluation in conjunction with a claim filed by H. C. Smith Construction Co. on Job No. P2-23-6, major facilities for 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2: Fixed Fee $14,000 Plus actual direct labor costs Plus actual dligible overhead (presently estimated at 110%) applied to direct labor costs Total above fees not to exceed $112,000.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Chairman Ron Pattinson, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Selection Committee Approved: „ Fred A. Harper, General Manager ► III" III 8C.FNnA ITFM MR(1z) (1 ) - All nTCTDTrTc T RESOLUTION NO. 83-17 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P2-23 & P2-24 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROVIDING FOR SERVICES TO ANALYZE THE CLAIM OF H. C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CONTRACTOR FOR JOB NO. P2-23-6, AND PROVIDING FOR EXTENSION OF THE TERM OF SAID AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with 75-MGD Improved Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on January 12, 1983, authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No,- 6 to the Construction Management Services Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. re Jobs Nos. P2-23 and P2-24, for additional engineering services to analyze the claim in the amount of $7,289,957.70 submitted by H. C. Smith Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6; and, WHEREAS, it is, therefore, deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for continued services through September 30, 1983, in order to analyze said claim; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said additional services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. "IV-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(B) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 6 dated February 9, 1983, to that certain Agreement for Construction Management Services re Jobs Nos. P2-23 and P2-24, dated May 25, 1980, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, and Butier Engineering, Inc. , providing for additional engineering services to analyze the claim submitted by H. C. Smith Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6, Major Facilities for the 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, and extending the term of said agreement from January 31, 1983, to September 30, 1983, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provisions for fees be increased to provide compensation for said additional construction management services on a per diem fee basis, plus cost with overhead allowance, as follows: Increase From To Per Diem $ 98,000 $1,347,060 $1,445,060 Profit 14,000 148,165 162,165 Extra Professional Services 102,000 102,000 TOTAL COMPENSATION $112,000 $1,597,225 $1,709,225 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 6 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 9, 1983. 11IV-2" AGENDA ITEM #16(B)'(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "IV-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: CR Pump and Dewatering Corp. DATE_ January 13, 1983 MODIFICATIONS TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAINS AT BITTER POINT JOB: PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-25 Amount of this Change Order ) (Deduct) $ 3,890.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 1. Elimination of Ductile Iron flanged joints on both sides of Pacific Coast Highway and subsitution of mechanical joints with U.S. Alloy tee bolts and nuts, elimination of 2-3/4' prefabricated Ductile Iron wedges with flanged ends, all per Contractor's request, for the lump sum deduction of $3,890.00 TOTAL DEDUCT: $3,890.00 2. The Contractor is granted a time extension of 78 calendar days for delivery of the eccentric plug valves. 78 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date August 5, 1982 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 2, 1982 Time Extension this C.O. 78 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 78 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 198 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date February 18, 1983 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change -(fi) (Deduct) ,y0.00 Amended Contract Pricer 129,572.00 Board authorization date: February 9, 1983 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By. 2/3/83 By 2/3/83 CR PUMP & DEWATERING Contractor Chief Engineer CORPORATION 2/09/83 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 1 ) CALL ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING: SCHEDULED UPCOMING MEETINGS: RECLAIMED WATER PRICING POLICY - THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1OTH COMMITTEE AT 4: 00 P. M. AT TUSTIN CITY HALL FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - TUESDAY, MARCH 8TH AT 4: 30 P. M . (TENTATIVE ) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD AT 5: 3O P.m . INVITE THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS: NORM CUL EV R HENRY FRESE -OR- CAROL KAWANAMI FRANK LASZLO w 2) REPORT ON CASA MEETING AT INDIAN WELLS - JANUARY 27, 28 & 29TH DIRECTORS PRESENT: ,JOINT CHAIRMAN DON HOLT DICK EDGAR ELVIN HUTCHISON BRUCE FINLAYSON DON SMITH BILL VARDOULIS FORMER SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTORS: DON WINN DON Fox 3) INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION REGARDING EXEMPTION OF TREATMENT FACILITIES FROM "ON PEAK" RATES (ASSEMBLYMAN NOLAN FRIZELLE) ESTIMATED SAVINGS ANNUALLY TO OUR AGENCY $400, 000 MR. WOODRUFF WILL GO INTO MORE DETAIL DURING HIS REPORT 1 4) PUBLIC INFORMATION - �.J FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE ALTERNATE DIRECTOR COX OF NEWPORT BEACH TO ACT AS ADVISOR TO THE COMMITTEE r� i -/,u 4 --- ----- G MEETING DATE Feb. 9, 1983 TIME 7:30 P•m• DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3.5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (CRANK). . . . . . . . HANSON. . . . . . ✓ (NIELSEN). . . . . .ADLER. , , , , , , (BRIffccKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGERZ (MAC ALL�STER).BAILEY, . . . . .� (EIyGAR). . . . . . . .SALTARELLI . , (NIELSEN , , . , . ,BROWN, . , , , , , (RILEY). . . . . . . .STANTON. , , , , (HICKS). . . . . . . .COOPER. . . . . . (PERRY). . . . . . . .CULVER. . . . , ,_� DISTRICT 2 (SHARP), , , , , . ,EDGAR. . . . . , ._� (EDWARDS�. , . . . ,FINLAYSON. . , Mw�I1n ( �), , ,4i{-B•i4W.., , , , . , ,sG (S E I D EL). . . . . , .F R E S E. . . . . . . �(OVERHOL7), , , , ,ROTH, , , , , , , ,�G (JARREt�L). . . . . . GRIFFIN. . . . . ✓ (NIELSEN). . . . . .6R0'.JN. . . . . . .� (CRANK J, , , . , , . . HANSON. , , , . .� (HICKS). , . . . . . .COOPER. . . . . . �/ (COX) , , . . . , . . .HART, . , . , , , ,-� (KUZNIK), . . , . , : HOLT. . . . . . . . ✓ (HARTl, . . . . . . . . HEATHER. . . . ._� (ODLUM). . . . . . . .KAWANAMI , , . ._,G (KUZNIk). , , , , . . HOLT. . . . . . . ,_� �BRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMB0URGER� NANDERi��AU: :LASZLO RANK�. . . . . . . . HUTCHISON. . ._;„C WIEDER). . . . . . .�� . . . DLUM . KAWANAMI, , , , CULVER). . . . . . . PERRY. . . . . . .� . . . . . (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . ._ (BRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (HOLMBERG). . . . .WEDEL. . . . . . ._,. (FINL�Y). . . . . . .MANDIC, . , , . . (CATLIN). . . . . . .WINTERS. . . . ._ (AGEE . . . . . . . . .MAURER. . . . , . (LACAYO . . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . , ,�� COOPER), , , , , , ,NELSON, . , , , ,_ DISTRICT 'S WIEDER). . . . . , ,NESTANDE. , . . — (MAC ALII�ISTER), PATTINSON. . a ✓ (EDWARDS). . . . . .FINLAYSON. . . ✓ (CULV R). , , . . . . PERRY. . . . , , ,� (VANDERSTAAY), .LASZL0. . . . . ._,,C (HART�. . . . . . . . .PLUMMER. . . . . � NIELSEN). . . . . .ADLER. . . . . . ._,G (MARSHOTT). . . . .RELL. . . . , , , ._ PERRY) , , , . , . .CULVER, , , . , , (STANTQQN). . , . . .RILEY.. . , . , ,_y,_/ SEIDEL). . , , . , ,FRESE. . , , . . . (WEDELI. . . . . . . .ROGET. . . . . . ,_� (JARRELL). . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . . . (OVERHOLT). . . . .ROTH. . . . . , , , ✓� SBRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (EDGAR). . . . . . . .SALTARELLI „�G I FINLEY). . . . . . .MANDIC. . . . . . (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . (LACAYO). . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . . . (RILEY), , . , . , ,STANTON. . . . ,_y,,C � COOPER). . . . . . . NELSON. . . . . . (ZOMMICK�, , , , , .SYLVIA. . . . . ._�G MARSHOTT). . . . .RELL. . . . . . . . (AGRAN). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS, , ,_y� (WEDEL). . . . . . . .ROGET. . . . . . ._ (GREEN). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . . . ...C (OVERHOLT). . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . ). , ,1d{-�h�4, . . . . , ._!C (ZOMMICK). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . ROGET votes . , ,'dEDEL, . . . , , , ✓ (NESTANDE). . . . .WIEDER, , . , , , _ (NESTANDE). . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . ✓ (CATLIN). . . . . . .WINTERS, , . . ._� (CATLIN). . . . . . .WINTERS. . . . . _� DISTRICT 5 (COX). . . . . . . . . . HART. . . . . . . . (AGEE). . . . . . . . .MAURER. . . . . . _y� (STANTON). . . . . .RILEY. . . . . . ._ STAFF: HARPER, . . . . . DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER@ , , �—' LEWIS. . . , , . . (CRANK). . . . . . . . HUTCHISON. . . ✓ CLARKE, , , . , , (HART) , , . . , . . ,PLUMMER. . . . .,/ DAWES, . , , , , , (RILEYS, . , , , . , ,STANTON. . . . ,,G ANDERSON, . , , BUTLER, . . . , . DISTRICT 7 BROWN, . . , . . , BAKER. , , , , , . (SALTARELLI ). . . EDGAR. . . . . . ._idol ATKINSON, , , , BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . ..G YOUNG, . . , . . . HART)„ l!, . . . . . HEATHER. . . . .�C (BRICKENI, , . . . .LUXEMBOURGER_le— OTHERS: (W I EDER). . . . . . ..Nfi6+ +#19�E. . . ,� WOODRUFF, so . (AGRAN). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. , . HOHENER. , . , . (GREEN). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . . . .�� HOWARD, . . , . . HUNT. . . . , , , . DISTRICT 11 KEITH, , , , . . , -- KNOPF. . , , , . . SMAC ALLISTER).BAILEY. . . . . . LE BLANC. , , . ((NESTANDE), , , cc.'W[EDER. . , , , , 9 LINDSTROM, , , (MAC ALLISTERI. PATTINSON, , ,_k:f LYNCH, , . , . , , MARTINSON. . . PEARCE. . . . . . 2/0/83 ` r FEBRUARY 9, 1983 JOINT MEETING NOTES #4 - Recognition of persons Paul Torres introduced himself and indicated that he represented the Orange County Metal Finishers' Guild and wished to speak later relative to agenda item No. 31. The Joint Chairman then recognized new Director Sam Cooper from Brea. #7(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman Chairman Holt reviewed the scheduled upcoming meetings: Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy Committee - Thursday, February loth at 4:00 p.m. at Tustin City Hall Fiscal Policy Committee - Tuesday, March 8th at 4:30 p.m. (Ron Pattinson indicated he couldn't attend but the majority of the others would be able to) Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 23rd at 5:30 p.m. (Invited Directors Norm Culver and Henry Frese and later asked Don Smith to attend as guests) Holt then briefly reported on the CASA meeting in Indian Wells on January 27, 28, and 29. Was a strong turnout from Orange County--Chairman Holt, Dick Edgar, Elvin Hutchison, Bruce Finlayison, Don Smith and Bill Vardoulis. Also former Sanitation District Directors Don Fox and Don Winn. He commented that Carol Onorato gave a dynamic speech at the CASA Conference in Indian Wells. One key item we brought up was relative to the charge for power at peak periods. We asked for support from CASA but did not get it. We do, however, have legislation that is being introduced by Assemblyman Nolan Frizzelle re exemption of treatment facilities from "on peak" rates. Would result in an estimated savings of $400,000 per year. He indicated Tom Woodruff would go into more detail on this in his report. Another item discussed was relative to reporting receipt of campaign funds. Said that didn't go anyplace either. Chairman Holt reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee and Reorganization Committee had met just prior to this Joint Meeting and took an action requesting that their recommendations be forwarded to the Executive Committee, pursuant to the Joint Board's instructions, regarding reorganization and possible Director changes. Recommendations will come from the Executive Committee, possibly at the next Board meeting. With regard to the Public Information Committee, have put this in the hands of the Fiscal Policy Committee and have asked Alternate Director Cox of Newport Beach to act as an advisor to said Committee. Mr. Holt also commented on the excellent job that Lydia Levin, of Tom Woodruff's ��\1 office, did at the Executive Commi ee in his absence. #7 (b) - Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper reported on supplemental agenda items. Re agreement with Hartge Engineering, the Selection Committee negotiated and recommend approval of amount indicated in supplemental agenda. With regard to Addendum No. 6 to Butier's agreement, advised that the Selection Committee would like a little different authority than what appears on agenda. Asked that approval be subject to receipt of the final recommendation of the Selection Committee. Said the Committee needed to talk further with staff to clarify some points. Mr. Harper then referred to the item requesting an increase in the total amount for vacuum trucking services necessary at Coyote Canyon landfill due to the recent rains. Said hopefully, this is going to be the last time we will have this problem. We do have authority now to go directly to the landfill with dewatered sludge from belt presses. Are now working with County staff on the plan. Once that is approved, will then have some additional expenses to close up composting operation. FAH commented on the new Chairman of the SWRCB, Carol Onorato. Said she was one of the late appointees of Governor Brown. He has spent some time with her and finds that she is a very positive type person. Is one of us. Think she will be very helpful. Seems to meet some of the issues head-on. Talked about why L.A. is getting all of the grant monies and about the new ocean plan mentioned to Directors last month. Will be some hearings held. They have taken the engineering and scientific approach re sludge in the ocean. We will be meeting with the EPA technical people on March 8th. Public hearings will start in April. Expect a lot of noise and a lot of media coverage. There will be a new appointment to the State Board because there is a vacancy that has occurred. No doubt this new appointee will be the appointed the Chairman. FAH added that he received a letter from Ken Willis, another new appointee, today asking to come down and talk to us about the business. Very pleased with the current staff. Briefly reported on another item and requested some time at the next meeting to discuss more fully relative to the orange-colored report in Directors' folders re deep ocean disposal of sludge which represents Cal Tech's first year's work. Stated that he just came back from 3 days in Seattle at NOAA's offices on the West Coast. They are really excited about this project. Had their scientists and two people from Washington, D.C. there. Pretty much got a commitment that if Districts will build the line, they will put $500,000 into the monitoring program. FAH asked if the Directors would consider taking about 45 minutes of their time at the next Board meeting to have Dr. Brooks talk to them about this study. Said he can explain things in language everyone can understand. Also mentioned Dr. Caulter (?) of NOAA's office in Washington and Dr. Bob Burn of the Seattle office. He added in conjunction with that, Kathy from Senator Cranston's office in Washington will spend the day with the staff tomorrow. Will be having visitors over the next 90-120 days since the Senate has come out with their bill on amendments to the Clean Water Act. Think if we can convince Senator Cranston's office, and he can convince Senator Wilson's office, that this is a good project, we will have enough help on the House side. Very optomistic but has happened before. .With regard to the 301(h) waiver, we were five years getting legislation changed and another five years have gone by and they still haven't given the waiver yet. Looks very close to our grasp though. -2- #7 (c) Report of the General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on two items. One re legislation on beneficiary rates for electrical energy. We currently experience about $4 million per year for electrical energy plus one-half of our energy demands is generated on site. The Edison Company has for a number of years had time-of-use charges so if you use electrical energy during peak loads, you pay a surcharge, "on-peak rate". 10% of our bill is attributable to that. Could save about $400,000 per year. A couple years ago a bill was introduced that would give exemption to all Districts to get rid of surcharge. Bill died because other things got tacked on. Said our staff has looked at it for a period of time. We went to CASA and tried to get their support. Took it to Attorneys' Committee and to Directors' Committee and to Managers' Committee and was recommended at all of them. Then went to general session and when it got on the floor there, someone spoke against it and it went down. In any event, our staff looked at it last week and decided to go it alone. This Board previously indicated support a year ago for this type of legislation. Changed the bill and contacted Nolan Frizzelle who sits on the Utilities Committee. He introduced the bill last Thursday and it provides for exemption for any publicly-owned sewage agency that generates on-site energy that can be used. Does not apply to any agency if they generate electricity as a cogenerator. Haven't seen the bill yet. Nolan ran it through the Public Utilities' staff first. Will have a full report next month. TLW then reported that the Board had previously been advised of a break in one of our lines about one year ago. Had $17,000 worth of damage to our line. The contractor that did it wouldn't pay for it. There was a manhole about 50 feet from the break. Litigated and was assigned to an arbitrator. Said we got a ruling that morning for the full $17,000 plus our costs. #13 & 14 - CLOSED SESSION from 8:07 - 8:21 #15 - Action on items considered in closed session The Joint Chairman announced that an action had been taken to adjust (increase) the Management and Department Heads' salaries by 6.2%. (Motion would be to adopt Resolution No. 83-23, amending Resolution No. ) #16(b) (2) - Butier Addendum 6 Approved Resolution No. 83-17 subject to receipt of final recommendation of the Selection Committee. #17 - DISTRICTS 2 & 7 TLW briefly reported that over the past couple years as a result of disputes re exchange of ad valorem taxes for properties primarily in Districts 2 & 7, we have found developers that have never secured permits nor paid appropriate fees. We have a difficult time on some of these making sure that we do get our connection permit fees and annexation fees. Are recommending the Boards establish this policy relative to filing a Notice of Encroachment. Most of these parcels are in the hands of the developers, so before closing escrow, will have to come in and get their permits. Have talked to some of the developers. We will record a Notice releasing the lien when all fees are paid. It was then moved, seconded and carried to approve this policy. .r -3- SHORT RECESS PRIOR TO DISTRICT 1 HEARING ON V.A.L. CIRCUITS #31 - DISTRICT 1 - V.A.L. Circuits (b) Report by GC TLW stated that this is the time and place for public hearing on proposed revocation of I.W. Discharge Permit No. 1-348 issued to V.A.L. Circuits. Advised that staff has prepared a variety of items for consideration by the Board including an Executive Summary as to the background and their recommendations. Procedure that will be followed will be to hear from staff relative to background as it relates to the permit issued, the nature of their operation, results of sampling and evaluation program in accordance with prescribed procedures, results of laboratory analysis of wastewater discharged into system, and results relative to copper discharge which has exceeded the approved range level since June, 1980. Said Mr. Anderson and his staff people will be reporting. There will be an opportunity for any member of V.A.L. Circuits to present evidence and staff can then respond to questions or introduce anything else. Upon closing of the hearing, the Board will be asked to make certain findings and determinations relative to the evidence they have seen and they will make their decision accordingly. (c) thru (g) , Staff Report, Discussion, etc. Blake Anderson, Director of Operations, introduced Lee Terry, I.W. Inspector, who gave detailed report. He indicated that V.A.L. is a manufacturer of printed circuit boards in Santa Ana. He then reviewed V.A.L. 's performance over the last three years and indicated they have been in violation nearly 100% of the time. Therefore, staff is recommending that their permit be revoked. Gave slide presentation on history of V.A.L. 's non-compliance. TLW stated that as part of the hearing procedure, the official files of the District which contain the Class I Permit issued to V.A.L. on June 1, 1980, and reports to them, including invoices in accordance with the schedule of fees, together with copies of each of the sampling charts and all of the corresondence in the District files will be introduced into and made a part of the record at this time. Added that the hearing has been conducted in accordance with procedures contained in Ordinance No. 103 and notice pertaining to the hearing has been provided and served on V.A.L. Notice appears to satisfy all requirements of the law. Said he recommended all documents be made a part of the record. It was so ordered. Hanson asked if the invoices and any court costs had been paid? Advised him that presently have $2,347.03 outstanding plus an additional $200-300 for the cost of the recent sampling and the charges for the most current period which hasn't been processed through Accounting at this time. Jess Valverde, President of V.A.L. , stated that these are current invoices and will be paid. He added that their sales volume when they got permit was $1 million per year. Is now $8 million. Have grown. Have put several items into operation and have spent quite a bit. Some of the things have worked and others haven't. Tried to use less water and improved their water consumption quite a bit. But the less water they use, the higher the copper level looks. Said they just took over the building next door in December and have moved part of the operation into the next area. Things they moved were not things that had -4- copper in them. Clean water. Said they got their volume down on the water and, therefore, the parts per million went up. Asked how they could grow and stay within their limits? Have 80 people working for them. Almost have to now say, no more growth. Asked how they can get their water consumption permit higher than 20,000 gallons? Said in volume, they are the third or fourth biggest shop in Orange County. Ron Larson, Vice President of V.A.L. , then spoke. Said what he wanted to state is that during the last 2'h year period they spent a lot of money on equipment suggested by the Sanitation Districts. Over $15,000 for copper filter system. Have had filtration systems in other parts of their shop also. Have added radiator-type system too. Spent $45-50,000 over the last 2 years. They run 24 hours a day. Sometimes if they do have a problem, seems to be created in the evening. Are trying to improve their evening hours and trying to educate their people while growing at the same time. They have to be knowledgeable so things do not get spilled. Also have problems with the Fire Department. One department says put it in and another says take it out. Would like to improve their system but want everybody to be satisfied at the same time. Are going through evaluation right now. Have changed system from panel plating to pattern plating. Were using 65-70,000 gallons of water per day. Now using 40-55,000 gallons. Need higher limits, not only for today but for next year, to allow for their growth. Could have another 15-20 employees easily. Decided to hire Par Enterprises to solve their problems; to evaluate and see what they can do to improve. BPA said first of all, he would like to state that the staff recognizes that things cannot be done overnight. Staff has been more than patient for the last 2h years with their not meeting discharge limits. As long ago as 10 months, were in contact with V.A.L. and asked for their cooperation. V.A.L. is in violation of the ordinance in two respects--not only in concentration but in total mass. Saltarelli asked, even if they were to triple water flow, problem is not simply because they have cut down in water? Blake replied, yes, permit is written in terms of mass. Concentration is also in violation. He added that the water units in the new building are in direct violation of District's ordinance. Were hoping that by removal it would allow discharge to be adequately treated, but this did not occur. Edgar asked what the staff response was re circumstances of business increases and need to increase pounds? BPA advised that staff meets with industries once we see that they have given good faith efforts to meet discharge requirements. Saltarelli asked if other similar businesses in the area are in compliance and was told there were. REL then commented that the 301(h) waiver application is one thing that is pending and that he wished EPA could hear this testimony. We have working with industries since the inception of our ordinance. We have written the ordinance based on mass emission. The reason for that is that we encourage water conservation. The EPA pretreatment standards are basically on concentrations. To meet their requirements could use a large volume of water. We do work with industries and try to adjust if they grow as long as they show a good faith effort to mitigate their materials. Said we are in a constant battle with EPA to see if they will approve our ordinance. The argument re water is not valid with our ordinance. Wish we could convince EPA that our ordinance is more successful, then pretreatment standards of EPA. V.A.L. and other industries are going to face more stringent requirements than ours. -5- 1 , -FAH asked REL to comment about the discharge of copper and its effect on secondary treatment facilities. Ray stated that copper is very toxic to the living organisms. Has been a considerable increase in the copper discharge in the last 12-15 months. Will kill off more than 15 million gallons of activated sludge. Sent letter to all dischargers that we have a copper problem here and asked for their help. Copper will kill off an activated sludge plant quicker than anything. Paul Torres, representing the Orange County Metal Finishers' Guild, then addressed the Board. Asked BPA once the temporary permit is issued, how long after that does enforcement action begin? In one year or three years or what? Blake replied that what Paul is talking about is when an industry is first permitted, we place them under a temporary permit. Do not have baseline data to make a reasonable estimate and write permit around that flow--.5 lbs. per day. After one year, V.A.L. 's was amended to .7 lbs. After that first year, then we began to take enforcement action against V.A.L. at the staff level and began to charge them non-compliance fees. Saltarelli asked what their average per day was. Replied it is 4-5 lbs. over their .7 lb. limit. Also asked, is the amount they are permitted for equivalent to what other similar size businesses of a similar nature are permitted for? Answered yes. Luxembourger had a question re citations for non-compliance and asked if they had legal counsel who had recommended they not sign the E.C.S.A.? Valverde said they did not have legal counsel. Blake added relative to Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreements, frequently we will meet with industries and they will have the same problem that they are not sure they will be able to comply with the time schedule outlined in the E.C.S.A. so we get with them and will modify it to a time agreeable to both sides. We do our best to come up with an agreement that is reasonable. He reiterated that permit is based on mass of .7 lbs. , not concentration. Lonny (V of ParwEnterprises then briefly addressed the Board. Said he had just been hired that day. Stated that V.A.L. has 8 times the amount of equipment and property and 16 times the square footage as when they started in business. Are entitled to more water consumption. Said Valverde has not requested an increase in permit level. TLW then clarified for the Board that in view of the fact that there appears to have been some misunderstanding by Jess Valverde re signing the E.C.S.A. , wanted to state for the record that the first notification of the E.C.S.A, was sent to Valverde on May 5, 1982, indicating that the staff was going to prepare and send the E.C.S.A. to his attention. Another letter was sent one week later enclosing the E.C.S.A. On July 19th another letter from Mr. Benzie indicated V.A.L. had chosen not to sign the E.C.S.A. On October 12, 1982, Mr. Sylvester wrote to Valverde indicating an E.C.S.A, was never signed contrary to promises given to Districts' staff indicating they would be in compliance by July 31st. Notice of hearing and recommendation to revoke this permit was sent on November 4th. This was again reviewed in detail by Mr. Sylvester and staff with Mr. Valverde. On December 30th Mr. Sylvester wrote once again that at the hearing of November 4th Mr. Valverde indicated that he could achieve compliance by November 19th. Compliance was not made. TLW added that just in case there was any question whether or not the District was offering a Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement, think the record is very clear about this. (g) Closed hearing. -6- (h) Discussion by Directors Saltarelli stated that this isn't the first time we have heard about circuit industry problems. Is a continuing problem and is important to understand that we are all business people. If there was no disdain on the part of this applicant, and if this is an $8 million company, why can't they pay their bills on time. Is their problem if somebody working at night causes the problems, not the Districts. See no other option than to say that we want to see them successful and profitable but must withdraw their permit. Saltarelli then moved to withdraw V.A.L. 's permit effective immediately. Motion to also include adopting Resolution No. 83-11-1, re finding of facts and orders. Motion seconded by Hanson. Saltarelli asked if this motion is passed to revoke permit, what happens and what do they have to do to get back into business? TLW replied that they are always able to re-apply for new permit. At that time will have to convince staff that all technical requirements could be met. Would have to have pretreatment equipment on site. When staff is convinced that they are making a good faith effort to comply, they would have the authority to give a new permit. Think it would probably be brought back to the Board for this action. There is no mention of this in the ordinance. Saltarelli added that this should be effective immediately because we are penalizing those others that are in compliance. TLW then reviewed findings of facts and orders for Directors. Action would be to revoke permit and authorize General Manager and General Counsel to take all necessary actions. Asked Directors whether they thought any of the findings of facts and orders were not correct or if they wanted to add anything. Saltarelli stated that they seemed fine to him. •.. Motion restated. Called for the question. Voice vote. Motion carried unanimously. NMW -7- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 3, 51 61 l AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 91 1983 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on February 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. , in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum `Awpresent for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: X Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank X Robert Luxembourger, Chairman pro tem Gordon Bricken X Don Saltarelli Richard Edgar X Roger Stanton Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 2: Henry Wedaa, Chairman X Todd Murphy X Don Roth, Chairman pro tem E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr, X Barbara Brown Ben Nielsen X Sam Cooper Norma Hicks X Donald Holt Robert Kuznik X Carol Kawanami William Odlum X Robert Luxembourger Gorden Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bob Perry Norman Culver X Don Smith Gene Beyer X Dorothy Wedel John Holmberg X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 3: X Bruce Finlayson, Chairman Roland Edwards X Frank Laszlo, Chairman pro tern Willemke Vanderstaay X Marvin Adler Ben Nielsen X Norman Culver Bob Perry X Henry Frese Norma Seidel X Don Griffin James Jarrell X Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken X Robert Mandic, Jr. Ruth Finley X Gerald Mullen Otto Lacayo X Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper X Charles Rell Frank Marshott X Earl Roget Dorothy Wedel X Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. X Charles Sylvia Kenneth Zommick X Harriett Wieder Bruce Nestande X Duane Winters Buck Catlin DISTRICT NO. 5: Evelyn Hart, Chairman John Cox X Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem Bill Agee X Thomas Riley Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: X Elvin Hutchison, Chairman Orma Crank X Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart _.I__Roger Stanton Thomas Riley DISTRICT NO. 7: X Richard Edgar, Chairman Don Saltarelli X Don Smith, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer X Jacqueline Heather Evelyn Hart X Robert Luxembourger Gordon Bricken Bruce Nestande X Harriett Wieder X Bill Vardoulis Larry Agran �✓ X James Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: X Ruth Bailey, Chairman Don MacAllister X Harriett Wieder, Chairman pro tem Bruce Nestande X Ron Pattinson Don MacAllister -2- 2/9/83 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Ray E. Lewis, William N� Clarke, Tom Dawes, Blake Anderson, Rita Brown, Hilary Baker, Ray Young, Lee Terry, Steve Chandler OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Pete Barotti, ,' ' Sam Peterson, Paul Torres, Jack Kinney, Jess Valverde, Ron Larson, Lonnie Gaskin * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following cities re appointment of Directors, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards. (*Mayor) City District Active Director Alternate Director Brea 2 Sam Cooper Norma Hicks* Brea 3 Carrey Nelson Sam Cooper Yorba Linda 2 Henry Wedaa Todd Murphy* DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to t1vao) Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be '- deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the : Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1983, or the adjourned meeting held January 25, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 2/9/83 A DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, `bd 1983, or the adjourned meeting held January 19, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1983, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Donald Holt called the Report of the Joint Chairman Directors' attention to the following scheduled committee meetings: - Reclaimed Water Pricing Policy Committee: Meeting on Thursday, February 10, at 4:00 p.m. at Tustin City Hall - Fiscal Policy Committee: Meeting on Tuesday, March 8, at 4:30 p.m. - Executive Committee: Meeting on Wednesday, February 23, at 5:30 p.m.; Directors Norm Culver, Henry Frese and Don Smith were invited to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Holt then gave a brief report on the CASA Winter Meeting held on January 27, 28, and 29 at Indian Wells. The Districts were represented at the meeting by Chairman Holt and Directors Richard Edgar, Elvin Hutchison, Bruce Finlayson, Don Smith and Bill Vardoulis. The Districts requested support from CASA regarding our proposed legislation to exempt wastewater treatment facilities from "on peak" electric power rates. The CASA membership did not support this request, but Holt reported that Assemblyman Nolan Frizelle will introduce a bill during this session that would direct the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to allow such an exemption, which would save the Districts an estimated $400,000 per year. Holt also indicated that the CASA membership had discussed a proposal regarding reporting of campaign funds, but had taken no action on the proposal. Chairman Holt then reported that a joint meeting of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts was held just prior to the meeting of the Joint Boards. The joint committees will submit their findings and recommendations regarding reorganization and possible changes in the composition of the Boards to the Executive Committee in accordance with the instructions given by the Joint Boards. Holt further advised the Directors that he had asked the Fiscal Policy Committee to study establishment of an on-going public information program. He also appointed Alternate Director Cox to serve as an advisor to the Committee due to his extensive experience. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager called the Directors' Report of the General Manager attention to three supplemental agenda items. He indicated that the Selection Committee had completed its negotiations with Hartge Engineering regarding design of rehabilitation facilities in the Bushard Trunk and Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, and recommended approval of the negotiated fee. Regarding Addendum No. -4- 2/9/83 6 to the Construction Management Services Agreement with Butier Engineering, which provides for additional services to analyze the $7.2 million claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6, the Selection Committee requests approval, subject to its final recommendation. The final supplemental agenda item discussed by Mr. Harper requested an additional $30,000 in purchase order authority for vacuum trucking services to control storm- water runoff at the Coyote Canyon landfill due to continuing wet weather conditions. Mr. Harper advised the Directors that the Districts were already depositing dewatered .' sludge directly into the landfill under an agreement recently worked out with the County, and indicated that the staff was presently carrying out a plan to close down the composting facility. The General Manager reported that Carol Onorato, Chairperson of the SWRCB, in discussions at the recent CASA meeting, appears to be taking a very positive approach toward resolving key issues, including deep ocean disposal of sludge and has stated that she is interested in fact finding rather than rhetoric. Public hearings will begin in early April on the revised California Ocean Plan. Mr. Harper requested, that with the Boards' permission, a presentation would be made at the March meeting of the Joint Boards by the NOAA and Caltech program managers responsible for directing the Districts' deep ocean sludge disposal research project. The NOAA scientists will be in Southern California to discuss their participation in the project with the staff, Caltech and SCCWRP scientists. NOAA staff has indicated that if the Districts build the proposed sludge line, NOAA will commit $500,000 to monitor the discharge and support the Districts' research efforts. Mr. Harper also reported that Kathy Files, a senior staff aide from Senator Cranston's Washington, � D.C. office, would be meeting with the staff this week to discuss the project as well as the Senate's version of proposed amendments to the Clean Water Act, which will be debated during the upcoming session of Congress. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefed the Directors on Report of the General Counsel the legislation the Districts proposed at the CASA meeting that could save the Districts more than $400,000 annually, by allowing the "on peak " rate exemptions for agencies such as the Districts that produce part of their own energy requirements. The General Counsel will present a full report on the legislation to the Joint Boards next month. The General Counsel also reported that the Districts had received a favorable ruling from an arbitrator regarding litigation with Pacific Pipeline, Inc., a contractor which had ruptured a Districts line a year ago and caused $17,000 in damages to the line. Pacific Pipeline had refused to accept responsibility for the break, and the Boards then directed the General Counsel to initiate a lawsuit to recover damages. The suit was assigned to an arbitrator, and the arbitrator awarded the Districts the full $17,000 plus our costs. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on Pages "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated: -5- 2/9/83 1 12 83 1/26 83 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $205,786.30 $251,810.09 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 323,978.50 184,149.38 Joint Working Capital Fund - 22,530.29 152,947.70 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,313.59 7,584.19 DISTRICT NO. 1 - --- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 3,648.67 5,595.59 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 787.45 9,150.37 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 456.24 7,583.03 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 119.92 330.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 3,517.76 1,933.33 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 29,264.00 6,019.36 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 604.85 2,933.14 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,794.24 --- $598,801.81 $630,036.18 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing execution of an agree- ment re Districts' membership in That execution of an agreement providing the Underground Service Alert of for the Districts' membership in the Southern California Underground Service Alert of Southern California, as required by Assembly Bill No. 3019, be, and is hereby authorized; and, �.d FURTHER MOVED: That payment of fees in accordance with the fee schedule contained in said agreement (estimated to be less than $100/month) , be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Job No. P2-25-1A specifications for Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, authorizing an addition of $21,982.00 to the contract with Hoagland-Artukovich, a Joint Venture, for rerouting of the digester cleaning line and a change in the pipe size in the floor drain system, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. PW-098 specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-098, authorizing an addition of $13,162.00 to the contract with L & H Construction, a Joint Venture, for soil removal and grading of catch basins, recompaction of specified areas and installation of temporary roadway, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- 2/9/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to That the General Manager be, and is attend the International hereby, authorized to designate one Conference on Thermal Conversion staff member to attend the International of Municipal Sludge in Hartford, Conference on Thermal Conversion of Connecticut Municipal Sludge sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency to be held in Hartford, Connecticut, on March 21-24, 1983; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member from That the General Manager be, and is Operations to attend a two-week hereby, authorized to designate one computer training program in staff member from the Operations Minneapolis, Minnesota Department to travel to the Autocon facility in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for a two-week training program beginning February 14, 1983, on the use of the computer installed as part of the Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Butier Engineering, That the Boards of Directors hereby Inc. for construction management_ adopt Resolution No. 83-15, approving services re Job No. P2-25-1A Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with construction of Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Basins) , Job No. P2-25-1A, providing for an extension of the agreement from January 31, 1983, to the date that said project is accepted as complete by the Board of Directors (estimated to be June, 1983) , with no increase in the total maximum authorized fee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on January 26, 1983, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Revising per diem compensation Policy for employees on out-of- That the Boards of Directors hereby county assignments adopt Resolution No. 83-18, revising per diem compensation policy for employees on out-of-county assignments and rescinding Resolution No. 80-50. -7- 2/9/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: �.d Receive and file Memorandum from the General Counsel re procedures That the Memorandum from the General to implement new statutory Counsel dated January 19, 1983, relative provisions for campaign contri- to procedures to implement new statutory butions provisions re campaign contributions, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That procedures and forms recommended therein, be, and are hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Declaring intent to exempt local governmental entities from user That the Boards of Directors hereby fees when ad valorem taxes are declare their intent to exempt local utilized for payment of mainten- governmental entities from user fees ance and operating costs when ad valorem taxes are utilized for payment of maintenance and operating costs, subject to modification by any District that determines a local unit of government is placing a significant demand on the Districts' sewerage system. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:07 p.m., the Boards convened in Convene in closed session re closed session to discuss personnel personnel matters matters. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:21 p.m., the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Revising Management and Department Head's Salaries That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 82-23, amending Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, adjusting Management and Department Heads' salaries. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file the Selection Committee's certification re final That the Selection Committee certification re negotiated fee with Hartge Engin- final negotiated fee with Hartge Engineering eering Corporation for design of Corporation for design of Rehabilitation of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Bushard Trunk, from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to to Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job Nos. Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley and I-2R-1 (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) , and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Headworks Influent Sewer Gates Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 2/9/83 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with Hartge Engineering Corporation re design That the agreement with Hartge of Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk Engineering Corporation for design of from Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, from Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, and Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks to Ellis Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Avenue, Fountain Valley, Job Nos. I-2R-1 Headworks Influent Sewer Gates (Phase I) , I-2R-2 (Phase II) and I-2R-3 (Phase III) , and Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, for a lump sum of $63,750.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Selection Committee certification re final That the Selection Committee negotiated fee with Butier Engin- certification re final negotiated fee eering, Inc. for construction with Butier Engineering, Inc. for management services ,to analyze the construction management services to claim of H. C. Smith Construction analyze the claim of H. C. Smith Company re Job No. P2-23-6 Construction Company in connection with Job No. P2-23-6, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 6 to the Construction Management Services That the Boards of Directors hereby Agreement with Butier Engineering, adopt Resolution No. 83-17, approving Inc. re Job Nos. P2-23 and P2-24 Addendum No. 6 to the Construction Management Services Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. re Job Nos. P2-23 and P2-24, providing for additional services to analyze the claim of H. C. Smith Construction Company, contractor for Job No. P2-23-6, on a cost plus fixed-fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $112,000.00, (increases maximum total compensation from $1,597,225.00 to $1,709,225.00) , and providing for an extension of the terms of said agreement from January 31, 1983, to September 30, 1983, subject to receipt of a final recommendation from the Selection Committee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Board action authorizing staff to issue purchase orders for That the Board Action of November 10, vacuum trucking of 1982-83 storm- 1982, authorizing the staff to issue water runoff at the Coyote Canyon purchase orders, as required, for vacuum ` sludge processing site trucking of 1982-83 stormwater runoff at the Coyote Canyon sludge processing site, increasing the total amount from an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $70,000.00, be, and is hereby, amended. -9- 2/9/83 DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to solicit �,w/ proposals for preparation of an That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Environmental Impact Report on the to solicit proposals for preparation of updated and consolidated Master an Environmental Impact Report on the Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts updated and consolidated Master Plan of Nos. 2, 3 and 11 Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement for said services. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Lowry That the Selection Committee be, and is & Associates for engineering hereby, authorized to negotiate with services re design of three Lowry & Associates for engineering projects services in connection with design of the following projects: (a) Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station (b) Orangethorpe Trunk Connection to Santa Ana River Interceptor (c) Easter Trunk Sewer connecting the Newhope-Placentia Trunk to the Santa Ana River Interceptor `...� DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other That the Board of Directors hereby affected taxing agencies re adopts Resolution No. 83-19-2, waiving Annexation No. 43 - Forrester ad valorem property tax allocation Annexation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 43 -Forrester Annexation, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Following a brief report by the General Approving policy relative to Counsel describing the difficulties the recordation of Notice of Encroach- Districts have experienced over the last ment and violation of District few years in collecting connection and Ordinance to protect Districts' annexation fees from developers that had interests re connected properties connected to the sewer system but had outside District boundaries not paid the applicable Districts' fees, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That a policy of recordation of Notice of Encroachment and Violation of District Ordinance to protect Districts' interests pertaining to connected properties outside District boundaries, as recommended by the General Counsel, be, and is hereby, approved. -10- 2/9/83 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m., February 9, 1983. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re proposed revocation of Industrial That the Staff Report dated February 1, Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-135 1983, in connection with proposed issued to Arnold Circuits revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-135 issued to Arnold Circuits, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m. , February 9, 1983. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications- re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 5-25 specifications for Modifications to Pacific Coast Highway Force Main at Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-25, authorizing a deduction of $3,890.00 from the contract with C. R. Pump and Dewatering Corporation and granting a time extension of 78 calendar days due to delays in delivery of materials required, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and Rehabilitation and Relocation of specifications for Rehabilitation and Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Relocation of Pacific Coast Highway Bay Bridge Pump Station to Dover Sewer from Bay Bridge Pump Station to Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-18R (Rebid) , changing the date for receipt of bids from January 25 to February 22, 1983, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m. , February 9, 1983. -11- 2/9/83 DISTRICTS 1, 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to solicit proposals for preparation of an That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Environmental Impact Report on to solicit proposals for preparation of the updated and consolidated an Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for updated and consolidated Master Plan of Districts Nos. 1, the northern Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 1, the half of 6, and 7 northern half of 6, and 7; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement for said services. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Waiving ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other That the Board of Directors hereby affected taxing agencies re adopts Resolution No. 83-20-7, waiving Annexation No. 99 - Shapiro ad valorem property tax allocation Annexation exchange with other affected taxing agencies re Annexation No. 99 - Shapiro Annexation, pursuant to negotiated agreement with County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle That the Selection Committee be, and is Engineering Corporation for hereby, authorized to negotiate with engineering services re design of Boyle Engineering Corporation for two projects engineering services in connection with design of the following projects: (a) Airport Relief Trunk (b) South Irvine Lift Station DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adlournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., February 9, 1983. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Contract No. 11-13-3 specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, authorizing an addition of $21,712.29 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company for rerouting of a siphon to avoid 23 undisclosed oil utilities and for additional cleanouts on 14 new manholes, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of additional work required, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. \.evly -12- 2/9/83 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with Smith-Emery Company That the Board of Directors hereby for in-plant pipe testing services adopts Resolution No. 83-21-11, required re Contract No. 11-13-3 approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with Smith-Emery Company for in-plant pipe testing services required in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 11-13-3, providing for additional testing services required and increasing the total compensation from an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $19,236.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , February 9, 1983. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle That the Selection Committee be, and is Engineering Corporation for hereby, authorized to negotiate with engineering services re design Boyle Engineering Corporation for of the Fairview-Gisler Trunk engineering services in connection with design of the Fairview-Gisler Trunk. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Introduction and first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 605, That Ordinance No. 605, An Ordinance of Amending Ordinance No. 604 the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Amending Ordinance No. 604 Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety, be and is hereby waived. Following a reading of Ordinance No. 605 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 605, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 Amending Ordinance No. 604 Pertaining to Establishing Sewer Connection _ Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be introduced and passed to the second reading on March 9, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., February 9, 1983. -13- 2/9/83 DISTRICT 1 This being the time and place fixed for Hearing and actions on revocation continuation of the hearing on proposed of Industrial Waste Permit No. revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge 1-348 issued to V.A.L. Circuits Permit No. 1-348 issued to V.A.L. Circuits on June 1, 1980, the Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:32 p.m. The General Counsel reported that this hearing was being conducted in accordance with procedures set forth in Ordinance No. 103, and that a notice pertaining to the date and time of the hearing had been served on V.A.L. Circuits. Staff Report re status of V.A.L. The Districts' Chief of Operations, Blake Circuits Anderson, introduced Lee Terry, Industrial Waste Inspector, who distributed copies of a staff report documenting the Districts' staff actions over the past three years re V.A.L. Circuits and gave a slide presentation highlighting the staff's reasons for recommending revocation of V.A.L. Circuits' industrial waste discharge permit. During the presentation, Inspector Terry indicated that V.A.L. Circuits, a manufacturer of printed circuit boards located in Santa Ana, had been in violation of the Districts' industrial waste ordinance nearly 100% of the time, and routinely discharged copper to the system in amounts significantly in excess of the limits set forth in their permit. Based upon the company's continued violations of permit provisions as outlined in the presentation and in the staff report, the staff recommended revocation of their permit. The General Counsel then introduced the official files of the District �✓ containing the Class I Permit issued to V.A.L. Circuits on June 1, 1980, various reports, invoices, sample results, and all correspondence between the Districts and V.A.L. Circuits into the official record of the hearing. The Chairman ordered all documents, including the written staff report and all official files of the Districts pertaining to V.A.L. Circuits, be made a part of the official record of the hearing by reference. Chairman Hanson asked the staff about the status of outstanding invoices owed to the Districts by V.A.L. Circuits. Staff indicated that V.A.L. owed $2,347.03 at this time, and will also be subject to additional non-compliance charges and sampling fees for recent violations identified by Districts inspectors that had not been invoiced yet. Presentation by V.A.L. Circuits The Chair then recognized Mr. Jess Valverde, President of V.A.L. Circuits, who outlined V.A.L. Circuits' attempts to comply with the ordinance through reduction of water usage, installation of new equipment and other means. The Chair also recognized Mr. Ron Larson, V.A.L. Vice President, who explained that the company had spent between $45-50,000 over the past two years for copper filtration and other filtration systems. He indicated that if the company experienced problems, they usually occurred during the night shifts when less supervisors were in the facilities. He also reported that they had just hired Par Enterprises, a pretreatment system consulting firm, to help them improve their operations. -14- 2/9/83 The Director of Operations advised the Directors that the staff recognizes that changes in industrial processes take time and that the staff had cooperated with V.A.L. Circuits in allowing them to attempt to comply with permit requirements yet they continue to be in violation. Further, V.A.L. has refused to execute la41) Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement setting forth a schedule and provisions by which the District and discharger agree that compliance will be achieved. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion of V.A.L. 's inability and/or unwillingness to meet discharge standards and the provisions under which permit limitations are set and revised due to changing conditions. It was pointed out similar companies discharging to Districts' facilities are in compliance with their permits. It was also pointed out that V.A.L. Circuits violation of their. ' discharge limits for copper presented a significant danger to the biological treatment processes in our plants. During the discussion, Mr. Paul Torres of the Orange County Metal Finishers Guild was also recognized and addressed the Board. Close Hearing It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the hearing on revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 1-348 issued to V.A.L. Circuits be closed, whereupon the Chairman declared said hearing closed at 9:16 p.m. Revoking V.A.L. Circuits Following further discussion, it was moved, Industrial Waste Permit No. 1-348 seconded and unanimously carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 83-22-1 re Findings of Facts and Ordering the Revocation of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 1-34A issued to V.A.L. Circuits, Inc. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 9:26 p.m. , February 9, 1983. Secretary, Bo rd of Directors County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -15- FUND NO A - JT LIST WORKINEY CAPITIL PPOCESSING DATE 1/11/83 PAGE I 3(pORT NUMBER AP43 CcUtj'f'i-tA-Nl'f'A-Tl6W-D!-S'TRICTS OF 'ORA6�_E' CbUoiTY* -"'---'-" 7 CLAIMS PAID 01/12/0 062221 ......__._A-1 NUPSERIES 1-22.31 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 2 A I"A 01)lit T S79-c W i k S15.30_-'____DEMURR'AGE"- 062223 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $550.00 MANHOLE REPAIRS 062224 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $92.22 VALVES A 14 F R 1 c F I L'T E $55.83 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (42221. AMEkICAN COMPRESSOR CO $932.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 062227 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $425.40 _.CSD0C. #7 .§pVK4-ftgLA 1 '062?2i,____ I H EA_N C H-0-i'l A c R I N 6-t fK-6-.2� PUMP PARTS 062229 AOUA bEN CORP. $119415.41 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 062230 bAKER PLYWOOD CO.# INC* $691.76 SMALL HARDWARE 062231 ___bECKMAN'7N5TRUMFNIS 062232 L.W. BEMIS TRACTOR E IMPLEMENT $61.88 TRUCK PARTS 062233 e1c, Box RENTAL CO. $1020.00 TRASH DISPOSAL -0 6 2 2 3 -�Y*E'VE-8-U-9�CL-cF'-C76N'STP'IYC:'T-I-UN Co. 8-1 6_.O 0 C Ri W4-C-T,0 R I il.-13-3 P62235 CPY CALIFORNIA9 INC. $141*81 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES CS COMPANY n6223f. $492.41 VALVES __062'217__ ----C'KLI*F"ORNI-K-AUT6--COCLI-!;rOU-;--fNf- 062230 CALIFORNIA DISTRItJUTORS $88.94 SMALL HARDWARE 062239 JOHN CAROLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN $4o242.20 P2-23-6 START-U.P,__P2-2 $926.00 F i-M 062241 CHAMBER-MIX CONCREJF% INC. 1647-84 BUILDING MATERIALS 224 2 _OQ CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES9 INC. $259587.96 ODOR CONTROL CHEMICALS AND__E_Qq!fMNT__ J;0622� -f-NC-. S31252.31 GASOLINE t-.062244 BRIAN CHUCHUAS JEEP, INC. $59502.49 USED VEHICLE of,224t) COAST COMPUTER CENTLPt INC. $59.36 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 0 621 1 2.46 EWWL T(fh 71 9-t-LUE-11k I-CAL-Ej I S T. $418*37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062247 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $189.33 ENGINE PARTS 062?�B ROBERT W. CURTIS s26.40 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REFUND __'O 6 224 c? ------- ''-D A I EY-Is I L UT Vi ff 7i a U-CA U--A-_D_V'E_R-fi,S_f N-.,G- DF,225fj DECO $36.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062251 DELPHI SYSTEMSt INC. $19392.50 A/R PROGRAM -STI-9152.34 WELDING REPAIRS 062253 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $431.10 PAINT SUPPLIES 662254 EASYMAN9 INC. $719.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES F'I %380-.-24 PIPE SUPPLIES 062256 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $167.52. LAO SUPPLIES D62257 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $162.13 �YMHR 0 6 2 2 5 P G E N E R A-C-7-EL EP ITO N E-C-67. Y_,'9 CA.2 6 TELEPHONE 062259 MR. IIAROLD GIMENO AND MR. FELIX O'KANE $94-84 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 062260 M.E. GRAY CO. $795963 PIPE SUPPLIES -062261-' ----DON-GREEK-9--AS-SOC T-A-TrS s 9 07 0'0 SURVEY 11-13-3 062262 HEK SALES $9.79 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06226:1, iED A. HAMMETT $188.00 j3_Fyft .�_Ej.LL ---C�22(,4----'------HAPT(TN(;Tow-rNDU'STR-rA-L PCA-STTrS-'-' SU 7 SMALL HARDWARE 06226f� MICHAEL HEINZ $36.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 062266 HERTZ CAR LEASING $19605.21 VEHICLE LEASING FUND NO '-1'19 JT PIST WORKINC, CAPITAL PROCESSING DATI 1/11/B3 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OWANGE 'COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/12/93 WARRANT NOSv r Nuo R -AMOUNT.._-- 06220 HOAGLAND-ARTUKOVICH9 J.V. $1209ani.00 CONTRACTOR P2-25-IA _06226 6 HOUSE OF-BATTERIES . -$4'73-!57------- -6AffjAjES-- - .. . 062269 CITY OF HUNTINGTON PEACH 139550:h2 WATER USEAGE 062270 ISCO COMPANY $2,464.45 CONTROL EQUIPMENT '_O 6 2 2 7 1 ---1 N G RAM__P XF ER _JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 062272 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO- $70.20 TRUCK PARTS fj 6 2 2 7 3 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $3.20 WATER USEAGE --062274--'-------JCYLIE'S7-CHEMYC-A[S#-TNL. 127, CHLORINE 062275 KAMAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY $246.77 BEARING SUPPLIES o62271 KING BEARING9 INC. $162.14 BEARING SUPPLIES 062277* L-&'-tf-CONSTRUCT-T -------$47--IV44-;35— 2-14 062278 L.r,.W.'..t INC. $1:575.41 WELDING SUPPLIES OL2279 LARRY#S BLDG. MATEkIALS9 INC. $108.96 BUILDING SUPPLIES -'062260-'-'---LIFEC'DrLTAFETY-s,rwrcE: S LY -t 4`?4O_C_ FIRST Al itI00ILiff 062281 LIGHTING DISTkIBUTOkSq INC. $747.06 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062282 LISOVORE* INC./ARIE BLOK 1604.23 BELT PRESS CONSULTING 062283 'LOCAL---AGENCY-'FORKATION'-CO14M-I-S-S-I-O-w 062Z84 MCCOY FORD TRACTOR $213.72 TRUCK PARTS 062214!- MCMASTFR-CARR SUPPLY CO. $245.11 SMALL HARDWARE 06228 6 -----NATTONNi:-ST)N*TCS-- S rTU-.73 9 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062287 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $210-42 WATER USEAGE 06228P NOTTINGIIAM PACIFIC CO. $74.20 EQUIPMENT RENTAL --8 f;2 28 5 -----0 R-A'N 6 E-C OUNTY-A Ul u I I R 15 C u. -33 2 3--7 r_ __TWRjFPARTS-"----- ;P062290 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $569.02 PIPE SUPPLIES �62291 OXYGEN SERVICE $96.00 DEMURRAGEi: 229-Z-- _______C0UN7"F_6R_A L PRE-EMPLOYMENT-EXAMINATIONS 062293 COUNTY OF ORANGE s42.00 PROCESSING FEE 062294 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $49256.63 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND 0(229 ------URANGE-'COUNTY-WATER-DTSTPTCT— 0 6 3'-.7 0 WATER PRODUCTION 062296 PPG INDUSTRIESs INC. $193.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 062297 PACIFIC TELEPHONE s111.38 _-TELEMETIRING... 00229-8 --PE-ATip-'MAR-WICK--MITCTfEL-C-L-C 0. $7b!F-.Db DISABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTING 062299 PICKWICK PAPERPRODUCTS 419062.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 062300 PITNEY BOWES S87.45 POSTAGE-METER .RENTAL .. . --0623(;T'- PARTS 062302 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $27.06 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE 062303 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $309.25 TRASH DISPOSAL I 0623"0-4____'_'_-RAND_C'OMP"UTERCENT" _fT_0'6-0 6— #6 USER CHARGE COMPUTER R ERilCIS 062305 ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO. S1078.02 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062306 RUTLAND 700L & SUPPLY $88.85 TOOLS 362ZO7-- A NTA--ANA-E'UE'CTR TC'-MDTFS G 775 u ELECTRIC N'OT_0RP_A_RT`S _ 06230H SCAL ENGINEERING CC. $2079.37 PUMP PARTS 06230': SEARSs ROEBUCK & CO. $412.71 TOOLS 0623141'-'"--"'--'--SHAMR'OCK-SUPPL-Y— _$17s 3-0 7-.64- TOOLS 062311 H.C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO- $65*077*00 CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 062312 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORF's $27*22 TOOLS .4 -FUND NO 9 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/11/83 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY--SANITATION"DISTRICTS'OF ORANGE' COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/12/83 062313 SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORP. ECHRUAL JOURNALS._ __0622i�'_'_____'____SOFTkAkE'__STORE _T. 062315. SO* COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $178*92 COMPUTER SOFTWARE REGULATIONS • 062316 So. CALIF. COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT 1209757.00 DEEP OCEAN .5LYQgF,,.Pt5PQ$AL-5Ti)QY . ___0 62 317------- POWER 062316 SOUTfIEPN COUNTIES OIL CO- $29035.20 DIESEL STEEL 119779.67 STEEL STOCK 0 CO- 4 0 ii-PL-6-Y-E-FAILEAGE 003, CVT T--t'T EV E WS_ 062321 SULLAIR SALES 8 SERVICE $21.46 PUMP 'PARTS 062322 THE SUPPLIERS $157.33 BUILDING MATERIALS _056' REIMBURSEMENT 2323 J. 'WAYNE'SYI:VESTER $I 062324 TAK TAKAMINE $616.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 062325 ARTHUR H. THOMAS CO. $81.82 PUMP _?ART4__ 0 62 39 F.M_.TA_0M_KS-AIA_CONf)1YfUffI 3303.41 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE OF2327 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYs INC. s1$313.84 TRUCK PARTS 06232F UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. S74.32 GASOLINE 062329 UNIONSIGN_CO.'____'___ -^-31.330•:30 �T SAFETY SIGNS 06233C UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1197.43 DELIVERY SERVICE 062331 UNIVERSITY SALES 9 SERVICE $17.76 T R 9 CA_-P A 8 T 0 6 2 3 TENT IFIC'____ ___$7'512�_.Tr_ LAB SUPPLIES 062333 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO* $446.09 PIPE SUPPLIES j 062334 VAUGHANOS INDUSTRIAL REPAIR CO $66.00 PIPE SUPPLIES 67-66CONTROL EQUIPMENT �M62335 $9 U62336 T11E WALDINGER CORP. $439651.66 RETENTION PI-19 :D6233 7 JOHN R. WAPLES $365-20 —900ft CON5ULTANT..- 062313•6 ---i 6-6-.14-6— SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 062335 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER S29643.02 ENGINE PARTS 062340 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP $542.83 _ELEC'TRICALAUPPLLU __062341 - Will TE-I'-F FINE-&--VERVIff['- -60 -DE-iP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 062342 THOMAS L- WOODRUFF $437.00 LEGAL SERVICES ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/12/83 $59R.H01.81 4 - FUND NO _ .__. .9199.-_.�T._-RlST._uQRKING_CAPlTaI .__.-_-- -•----.----•-__-- -_--- -- ..___. PROCESSING DATE___1/11/83 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLA1Hs_PAID SUMMARY_ —___-- — _-- -_AMOUNT. _ ._-92 OPER FUND -- ---_----------- #3 OPER FUND 787.45 F5 OPER FUND 295.70 _—. --_-A 5 .A C O .E U N R 95 F/R FUND 66.00 16 OPER FUND 119.92 #7 OPER FUND H7 ACO FUND 94.84 NII OPER FUND 474.00 Ill_.ACO_.FUND..___- 28...790_04 N566 OPER FUND 604.85 #667 OPER FUND 3,794.24 ____-4T .OPER. - CORF 323,978.50 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 56.96 __--_.__SELF FUNDER._WORKERS.'COMP, INSJURANCE FU D 11.25"3 ..------------ JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 22,530.29 ....----TOTAL CLAIMS-'PAI-D-01/12/83 598-801-81 v � 0 �. .~~ NO . .. ..^ . ~...^.. ~. . .' ` ~.`^~"^~~ "..` ^'.^."- ,,"" ^ / - OE236L ALEX FOODS9 INC. IR9878.42 INDUSTRIAL WASTE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT / 062363 ALPHA-BETA CO. $659625.3e USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT o62367 AQUA BEN CORP. $239998.93 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 062372 RIERLY & ASSOC14TESt INC. S550.uO WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR O6L�37! BLACK & DECKER MFG. CO. $63.84 TOOLS 062375 S3119S AIR CONDITIONING $32.00 TRUCK REPAIRS ::0 6237 1. BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE $170.30 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 062381 CS COMPANY $29033.40 VALVES 06230? :AL-THERM CO. SIV6111.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0 6 2 38 5. JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $49791*38 ENGR. 5 YEAR MASTER PLAN UPDATE 06?367 ART CARR TRANSMISSION $423.02 TRUCK PARTS 06235(1 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST- 319146.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 'UCTIONS S787.84 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 062!93 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES Slt(150.12 ENGINE PARTS 06239f. CULLIGAN DEIONIZED WATER SERVICE s64.70 �ATER SOFTENER RENTAL OF23'�7 LARRY CURT] TRUCK 8 EQUIPMENT $546.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ' ' ) / � � � i FUND NO JT GISI WOkK1Nf. CtPIT-IL PROCESSING GATE 1/^1/83 rAGE L r RFaO l NUll-lEl AP43 - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY " CLAIMS TIA0 jl/Ic/113 WARRANT MO: --- _.....- .. ... -VENPO1+ AMOUNT .. - . -- -- DESCRIPTION'---- - - ------ 062401 DELT'HI SYSTEMS, INC. 1212.00 PAYROLL TAX UPDATE • a624C.1 ..__.._..- - - DIALOG INFOPMATIOM SERVICES -._...- . -.. -- _ t1 76.57 - - -- - - - - - - --- -- -- TECHN I CAL' JOURNALS --- --- 062403 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. 12,JD0.00 SLUDGE GRINDER ; 062404 OOFADO ENTf.RFkISES, INC. y1,900.00 PLANT #I DIGESTER REPAIRS -- 662405 - -- DRAK�'S" GRADINL• & TOPSOIL BUfLDfNG - 06240o DUNN EDUAROS COkP. $337.61 PAINT SUPPLIES 062407 THE OURION CO., INC. $425.40 PUMP PARTS f ' - -- II "-•-'-"-"--- '-" USE CHARGE-OVERPAYMENT-- '-_ " .. 06P4 iY.------•--£:F:C'rCAHPfT M1LL'S_-_..-_-.._. -tfil'2'.79---.---. 062405 _ASTRAN, INC. $402.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 06241i1 EULFHARD EQUIPMENT 1508.64 J TRUCK PARTS - - 062411 _LOFN--[NTERPRISES. INC. _ _ ._. _... _. . -11,471a09---- -- "OFFICE-SUPPLIES_._..---- ..----------.-._. _ _ ------- -._-- { 062412 ELECTRONIC RECLAMATION SERVICE 1230.12 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT i P62413 EIVIRONFIENTAL 'RESOURCE ASSOC. SR7.50 PUBLICATIONS ---- - ------- 0624.14------- -ENVIi<OiECn '---------------'-- -- -._-___.--------•-'-•---.-. 330"76:80---- CONTROL EQUIPMENT ' • 0E2415 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $298.77 ENGINE PARTS I 062416 FISCIIER E PORTER CO. $329.89 PIPE SUPPLIES - I' -_•-- 06?414 -------- ---FISHEI -4CI ENT IrIC C0.- E945:72'-- -LAB"SUPPLIES ---- --- - � 062418 FONTAINE TRUCK EGUIPMENT CO. $734.85 TRUCK PARTS 062115 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 1270.T0 FILM PROCESSING �- Cd242u---•--C-tTY-OF-FOUNTAIN"VALL-Ei� ---- - ----ST:912:62- --------------- ------- -_..-..__ , 662421 THE FOXBORO COMPANY s1,196.02 CONTROL EQUIPMENT 062422 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $245.56 COMPRESSOR PARTS - d624.29---- --- FREDSON•- ------- -----175'4.-76---"--TRUC'K-PARTS--- ZG62421 CITY OF FULLERTON $27.84 WATER USEAGE N762425 GW MAINTENANCE, INC. 1161.15 SMALL HARDWARE j - --,- ----^ ----•--.._ _.._LUMBER- ,. oANAHL -LU HER-CO.--- - -. ---------•-'yl'i75T:4'8-- 062427 GEM-09-LITE PLASTICS CORP. $162.66 BUILDING MATERIALS 062426 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 159202.07 TELEPHONE 062425 M.F. GRAY -Co. _. __ _._.._. _. ____.__.___ .. . y282-:90--- "PIPE SUPPLIES"--- ------ --- -- , 062439 IIALPRIN SUPPLY CO. $565.59 SMALL HARDWARE ;I 062431 lEL' A. ItAMMCTT 12097.00 COYOTE NERAINWATER VACUUM TRUCKING j.. - -06243t-- -- -- HARR-INGION INUUS1kIAt-PLASTICS"- s1,U43:93' --' - j DE2433 HILTI. INC. 1155.13 SMALL HARDWARE 0624'4 HOLCHEFI, INC. $59060.00 CAUSTIC SODA -- 062435 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE __. .._._ .-...._1786:50" - - ---- -TRUCK TIRES 062436 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S9.97 "! WATER USEAGE 062437 HUNTINGTON REACH RUPBER STAMP S16.C2 OFFICE SUPPLIES - ` -5MACL-HARDWARE- - - - .. --06?43E�---------- -HUNT-1N6TON- SUPPLY_._.-.. .-_.-_....-----•_-.- _ -.--- ._.. -.'f5'4':26------- � 062439 I.A.P.M.O. HEADQUARTERS $13.52 TECHNICAL JOURNAL 06244G INGRAM PAPER s666.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES .i • 362441 -- INTe-FP1ATi0NAl BUS IH:SS'•MACH INE--- - --- -- y152r9t--- ---OFFICE- SUPPLIES 062442 INTERNATIONAL MINICOMPUTER 5510.85 COMPUTER TERMINAL FILTERS i G62443 JKL MANUFACTURING, INC. $58.46 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _......062444.._ . .. - JONES CHEMICALS, 'INC.--. -'CHLORINE- ... -- -- ... -_._. ._...- -- .- _.._ ._. - . ... . I .. , 06244� KAMAN 0E49INGS & SUPPLY IR16.20 .6244E KING "FARING, INC- BEARING SUPPLIES $664099 BEARING SUPPLIES f i FUND NO JT DIST NORKINC CAF•ITAL ` PROCESSINC !DATE 1/21/93 PAGF 3 � A REPORT NUMBER AP43 CkINTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE -COUNTY - -- - - CLAIMS PAID Oi/26/H3 -WARRANT -N'O. VLNDOk AMOUNT - - --- DESCR IOT ION 062447 L R N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO 149?33.11 UNIFORM RENTAL - - 062446-- - L:L'.W.S.9 -INC. b19820:17'- --.•. ___. -. WELDING SUPPLIES _ ...... G62449 W.R. LADE WIC CO. $151.32 PUMP PARTS 062450 LAPRY-S BLOC. hATFPIALS. IVC. $290.12 BUILDING MATERIALS --....._OE,2451.... LAURA -SCUDCE R OS - -- ...... _. _._..._.. .- - 124.590.91 ... _ - -- USE--CHARGE-OVERPAYMENT"----_._... -- 062452 LE11C0 ELF.CThIC CO. b243.52 TRUCK PARTS C62453 LILTZAU PATTERNS, INC. $29411.50 DRAFTING SUPPLIES • -- 1162454 _ ... . _. _.- L-IFECOM-SAFETV S£RVICE -SUPr•LY - SAFETY- SUPPLIES -" - -- - - 062455 LIGHTING DISTRIE•UTOkS, INC. $296.42 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06245f_ LONG BEACH SANDBLASTING CO. 41,993.75 SANDBLASTING -- 062457- :_-- A.J.--LYNCH CO. __ . _._..b862:45--- ----JANITORIAL'SUPPLI'ES - ---'- - - i-, 36245P M F PORT-A-BUILT CO. $133.13 BUILDING MATERIALS I CE •4^5 M.AROFN SUSCO $29010.82 PIPE SUPPLIES '•" •-___06246b- - MCHAS-TER-CARR--SUPPLY-CO.-- -- ---- - _._ . -__b263-'U0-'----'_-'-SMALL-HARDWARE 062461 MICEL, INC. $132.76 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT II 6624E2 MILLERS FRTNTEP.Y 678.02 TYPESETTING - 0624E 3_.. . .__. . - NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY-._ _..... ._. . ___._-__._-- .-_-__.-• --.....31°4 r01 -----------SMALL HARDWARE l..l 0624E4 CITY OF NEIaPORT N.EACH b10.26 WATER USEAGE � G62465 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY $19575.00 MANHOLE REPAIRS --.-.-06P466------ ----NIIMAi-If: iNf,lA'EERING-- -. _-_..-------..----------s1•fi2•:19._.- -EL'ECTRICAL'"SUPPLIES___..-----_.--.-- .. ...._ .. ..._.. -_._._._ _. G62A67 OCCILEWTAL COLLEGE-CASHILR $695.40 OCEAN MONITORING 062468 OLE Lf19 INC. $197.18 PUMP PARTS - - 062469- - - -ORANGE COUNTY-FARM-SUPPLY -CO-- ----- ---- - - 1,4S:-75----LAN DS CAP ING SUPPLIES --- - - --- '� -06247G ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $514.35 VALVES W062471 OVERHLAD DOOP CO OF ORANGE CTY $497.50 DOOR REPAIRS ' w - -::062472 _.. _ ..__. _ DAY6EN SEicVICE __ -_._-____ -_._..-_-_ __-_ - _-._--_•_-1137:99----- -SPEC I"ALTY-GASES ---_. ...- --,_... .....---....._..__ . .. 062473 COUNTY OF ORANGE 129092.40 LAB ANALYSIS, RADIO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 062474 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTPOLR 125,361.00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES - - 062475 - -- -EOUN-TY SANITATION--GISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 169970:-19----- REPLENISH-'WORKERS'' 'COMP-FUND - 062476 PFG 1NGUSTHIES• INC. $10145.05 PAINT SUPPLIES 062477 PACIFIC PUMPING CO. $19.33 PUMP PARTS i --06247b --- --• --PACIF!•C-TF-LEPHONE --1174:04- TELEMETERING-_..._..- _ _.---.---------- __-- -_-___ - _--- ---.... I 062479 PARTS UNLIMITED $782.68 TRUCK PARTS 062480 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $268.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ,. _..- 06248.1... .. .... -- -PLACEN17A TRUCK 4RECKING .... ..............--- - -- --...__ ._ ._..ti18.00 --------TRUCK PARTS - 062482 PORTER COILE.R SERVICE♦ INC. 1148.lQ BUILDING MATERIALS C624n3 POSTMASTER $19000.00 POSTAGE - ---Gn248i -- - -- HAROLD-FRIHROSF-ICt---- - -- ------- - --Sky;p0-- INDUSTRIAL WASTE"'SAMPLING-.ICE.__ _._. ._ _.._._._...._.._ ...__-.-- C6c"4R5 RED VALVL- CO., INC. 1259.20 VALVES Of.2486 THE PEGISTER $474.32 LEGAL ADVERTISING •I ----_-..--RcLIAPILt- CONCR€TE--CUTTING- CO.------ -- -------bliT-50 BU-1LDING-MATERIALS-_. O6?466 ROISU1NS F. MEYERS $583.00 PUMP PARTS 06248n RUTLANF) TOOL k SUPPLY $25.94 TOOLS RYAN-NERCU ... 062491 SANCON TNC. $39300.00 BOX COVER REPAIRS 362492 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS 1927.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES iti FUND NO 91 i_l JT 111.31 WOORKING ('01 lit.l. PROCESSING DATE PAGE REPORT tjUMhFR AP43 % COUNTY SANITATION DINTRICTS-OF- ORANGE COUNTY- CLAIMS PAID 01/?6/83 ---WAR R A t#T--NO. -911's CR I P TtOW- 06 24 9 SANTA ANA DODGE 1206.13 TRUCK PARTS 0 6211',It------ --SANrJ%--ANA- ELF-Clk IC-MOTOkS 13 055-i 76-------*ELECTRIC-"MOTOR PARTS 062495 SCHOLL it CO. ADVESTISING 1512.50 PUBLIC INFORMATION CONSULTING (If.2496 SCOPUS" CORP. $2037*50 COMPUTER DISK PACKS -----t-26-0700---CSDOC-#3-MANHOLE'-REPA-I*R'S*---- OF-2498 SEARS. ROEBUCK t CO. $19249.48 TOOLS 062499 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $29231.12 TOOLS t4'677-9-711---TRUCK T I RE S- k)6?5(11 SLADDLN ENGINFURING $285.00 TESTING PI-19 062502 SMITH-EMERY CO. 110896.00 TESTING 11-13-3 ----SOLAR--TURF INES INTERNATIONAL- SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $19308.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 062535 SOUTHERN CALIF- EDISON CO. l969U34.63 POWER SOGAL-IF--Ef4ERGY-COkLII I-ON-AND ENGINEERING-SUPERVISION'-t25O-:0t)--COAI:ITIOH-MEMBERSHIP-FEE---- L;` 062507 So. CAL. GAS CO. $259936.95 NATURAL GAS 062508 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $89954#39 DIESEL FUEL 062510 STAkOW STEEL $19987.78 STEEL STOCK 062511 SUFER CHEM CORP $670.45 SOLVENTS 06251,A J. WAYNE SYLVESTER 1335.86 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 662514 TAk TAKA14INE s100.00 SEAL BEACH PUMP STATION MAINTENANCE 5--------T-AYL-OR-INS-T-K-UmL--NTS PMENT- =062516 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $19727.30 PAINT SUPPLIES coa6251 -I TRANSAKERICA DELAVALt INC.�- $10137.25 CONTROL EQUIPMENT =0 FARE--VAR I OUS-MEET-I NGS 062519 TROJAN BATTERIES $813.19 TRUCK BATTERIES J62526 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY* INC- 1935.65 TRUCK PARTS 062522 J.G. TUCKER 9 SON* INC. $445.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 062523 U.S. AUTO GLASS, INC. $172-71 TRUCK REPAIRS 06E524--- SS-j 84-2;72—'—001 L D UNG-HATER I-ALS- 062525 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $38.69 DELIVERY SERVICE 062526 UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO.,p INC. $508-78 COMPRESSOR PARTS *062527- ----VWfi SCIENTIFIC——— %'555--37-----LAB-'SUPPL I-ES'-- 062528 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. %IvI33.33 PIPE SUPPLIES 06.529 VALVE & STEEL SUPPLY CO. $739-35 VALVES 0 625 3 rIE-LI-ALDINGER--Coftp-w------.-- Of253i WARREN & BAILEY $464.37 PIPE SUPPLIES 062532 WAUKESHA ENGINE SEPVICENTFR $489.91 ENGINE PARTS 062533 --------UES-14NGROUSE----ELEC-TRIC-CORP— S2 7-g-4-t- E LE C-T Itf-C AL--SU P P L-I E S 362534 WESTOIL TERMINALS $10.45 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 062535 WESTWAkD HOSE $19550o58 HOSE SUPPLY 625 3 6- ir-D-a--WHE T S-1 0 N E-&--A S aff-l-A 7 t 310 a 0 0—#6-U S E-C"AR G EP RO G RAM I N G 062537 WITEG SCIENTIFIC $19PI.8o LAB SUPPLIES 0625311 THOHAS L. WOODRUFF $79995.35 LEGAL SERVICES FUND NO JT DIt'T WOOFING.CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/'1/113 FAGF 5 REPORT NU4HER AP43 COUNTY sAl•IIT1111ON 01'31R1CTS Of ORANGE `COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O1/25/83 --WARRANT--NO. .._.... ... --- VFRL'UR- - - AMOUNT 062539 XEROX CORP. $39191.04 XEROX REPRODUCTION ---06254J ----- YOUNG' 1,ADPATOR'-00i_._.-__._._-......___.._--....- ---.....__.....,.__ ... $5o'7:OT_______.__..--ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES-___ ... .. .--.---- .-.--.-_- .___.-._..__. ----------------- -- -------T0T-AL-EL-AIMS- PAID-1)1 26/63 -._ _It30i 6:1-8--- ------- --- ----- ----- -.. ,. -------SUMMARY __.-. _---- --..._._----•-•--------._----- --- -- ---. ..__.AMOUNT..-_------ ------- ---- -.._- ••. ., -.._.__.._ #2 _OPER_FUND-------------- -- - - -- ._.—. -------.._..$ _.l.590..63___-- _-- -- - --- -------- - - - #2 ACO FUND 4.96 N3 OPER FUND 9,150.37 .• _--N5--DPER__FUNO .—__-.S,_335_94 __ _ ; 195 F/R FUND 1 ,247.09 :I #6 OPER FUND 330.00 --__ .ITAPER--FUME. __-- _ — - ---_._A..933..33 Ill OPER FUND 4,123.36 N11 ACO FUND 1 ,896.00 tn ._. 1I5s6.OPER FUND —. ..__.2.,933"1h JT OPER FUND 251 ,81o.09 CORF 184,149.38 --_- _SELF-_FUNDED_.L I A@ I L ITY_-I NSURANEE-__EUNQ___--- -- --_64-00 ---_ -- ----_-•----------- .__.-_ SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 7,520.19 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 152,947.70 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/26/83 $630,036. 18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING January 19, 1983 - 5:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of January 12, 1983, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Richard Edgar, Chairman, Don Smith, Jacqueline Heather, Bill Vardoulis, James Wahner, Harriett Wieder STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Rita Brown Second Reading of Proposed Following a brief staff report, it was Ordinance No. 717 moved, seconded and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 717, An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 716, Revising Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 717 by title only. Adopting Ordinance No. 717 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: That Ordinance No. 717, An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 716, Revising Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be adopted: AYES: Directors Richard Edgar, Don Smith, Jacqueline Heather, Bill Vardoulis, James Wahner, and Harriett Wieder NOES: None ABSENT: None -1- District 7 1-19-83 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:40 p.m., January 19, 1983. A 1. f • 4- - WJAW%% Secretary of the oard of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California lash -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING January 25, 1983 - 5:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of January 12, 1983, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Elvin Hutchison, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer �a aff Report on Long-Range The Assistant General Manager reviewed Financing the 5-year financial projections for the District and highlighted the anticipated shortfalls in both operating and capital funds during this period. Because of rapidly escalating costs to meet federal and state mandated requirements, revenues from current sources will be inadequate and the District faces a serious financial problem that unless resolved could jeopardize the integrity of the sewerage system. Mr. Sylvester then briefly outlined the financing alternatives available to the Board for establishment of a user fee to supplement ad valorem tax revenues to meet operating requirements and various capital financing alternatives to support District collection system and joint treatment works capital requirements. Mr. Sylvester advised the Directors that the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, the local sewerage agency which operates most of the street sewer system within District 6, is also considering establishment and implementation of a user fee in fiscal year 1983-84. Because both agencies provide similar services, they may wish to consider a joint public presentation of the proposals and the respective roles of each District in providing sewerage services to the community. The Board entered into a lengthy discussion of the merits of the various operating and capital financing alternatives as well as the procedural requirements and timetables involved in implementation of a user fee program, including holding joint public hearings with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District to assist property owners in understanding the nature and purpose of the proposed fees. Declaring intent to adopt user It was moved, seconded and duly carried: fee program and approving implementation schedule That the Board of Directors hereby declares its intent to adopt a user fee tarp program and to levy a special assessment (user fee) to be collected on the property tax bill beginning with the 1983-84 fiscal year; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to proceed with implementation of said user fee program in accorance with the preliminary timetable for development and implementation of a user fee to be collected on the property tax bill dated January 19, 1983. Authorizing issuance of purchase Following a brief discussion of the data order to County Assessor re data processing support required to implement processing support services for the user fee program, it was moved, user fee program seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute an agreement with the Orange County Assessor's Office for computer programming and processing to provide data base information, mailing labels and parcel charge tapes relative to user fees to be collected on the property tax bill, for an amount not to exceed $50,000. Authorizing the General Manager Moved, seconded and duly carried: to invite Costa Mesa Sanitary District's participation in a That the General Manager be, and is joint public presentation re hereby, authorized to formally invite Proposed user fee programs Costa Mesa Sanitary District to participate with District No. 6 in a joint public presentation of the respective user fee proposals. Directing staff to draft revisions Following a staff report on capital to connection fee ordinance financing requirements it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to draft a revision to the Districts' connection fee ordinance to increase the connection fee from $250 to $500 per dwelling unit for residential properties and change the basis for commercial/industrial properties from acreage to square footage of improvements (buildings) and fix the fee at $100/1000 square feet. FURTHER MOVED: That said ordinance be submitted for the Board's consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, February 9, 1983. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:33 p.m. Secretary of the Boara of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California -2-