HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-01-25,. ,.._. .. ,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
January 19, 1983
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 6
TUESDAY) JANUARY 25J 1983 -5:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of January 12,
1983, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6
will meet in an adjourned meeting at the above hour and date.
WHB: rb
II
.. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of o;ange County I Califomia
DISTRICT No. 6
ADJOURNED .. REGULAR.MEETING
TUESDAY) JANUARY 25 J 1983 . -5: 30 p IM·,
(1) Roll call
(2) Staff report· on long-range financial obligations:
(a) Operating and Maintenance requirements
(b) Capital requirements
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(3) Discussion re alternative·means of funding District's long-range
financial needs
(4) Consideration of action directing staff to proceed with selected
financing alternative
(5) Other business and communications, if any
(6) Consideration of motion to adjourn
January 19, 1983
COU NTY SAN ITAT ION DIST RICTS
of 0 RAN GE C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
P.0.BOX8127
10844 ELLI S AVENU E
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714)540-2910
(714) 962-2411
MANAGER'S REPORT TO DISTRICT NO. 6 DIRECTORS
Meeting Date: January 25, 1983, 5:30 p.m.
The purpose of this meeting is to review the Districts'
long-range financing needs and consider possible implementation of
user fees and modifications to the sewer connection fee schedule .
The Costa Mesa Sanitary District, which is the local sewering
entity for the largest portion of District No. 6, is also
considering adoption of a sewer use fee. Because the services
provided by both the Sanitary District and the Sanitation Districts
are perceived by the general public to be identical, it appears
advisable to conduct joint public workshops concerning the proposed
implementation of user fees to minimize any confusion. Staff has
held discussions with the Sanitary District on a possible joint
effort for public notice, workshops and hearings relative to the
implementation of a user charge system. We have also met with the
County Assessor's Office regarding the possibility of using their
data base for calculating and collecting the charge on the property
tax bill.
Enclosed is a cash flow projection for District No. 6 and a
tentative schedule for adopting and implementing a user fee in
cooperation with the Sanitary District. Staff will present a
status report to the Directors on Tuesday.
ll
15
16
17
:~
19
~o
21
29
)J
ll
)2
))
H
JS
)6
37
ld
H
~o
D!SCRIPTIOS
R~sccvcs ' Carey-Over Prom L.tst Ye ~r
~
Sh..> re of l \ Tu A.lloc.>t ion
?ecs
!nterest ' ~iscell.ineous Income
Ot~e c ~~venu e
TOTAL ~J::l.'U~
'TOTAL .\ W..! :.\JI!.? l'USD INC
?X ~!,._'RES
S~c• o! Joint Woc<s ~ ' O
Collection System~~ o •nd Ot~ec Op<!r.
Ot~ec Ex?end itures
TOTAL !::< ~ll r.ulU:S
Reserves ' C~r~y-Over to Next Year
Sext Yeac's ~ry P•c i od ?undlnq Requirements
?cnd Balance or (Oe!lcitl
CAP!T.\L F1..~1l (S)
Reserves ' C3rry-Over ~rom Last Year
~
Cons:ruction Cr•nts
!'!!~S: C..:nnec~on
O t~er
Sale of C~paclty Riqhts
Interest ~ ~.iscellan.eous Income
Other :.r.cco.e
TOTAL .\ v;\I !..1.31.? !'\ISD INC
!.~~!~~
S~re of Joint Wor~s Treatment Ptant
O•st.rict Collecdon System
Rei!Abu.r s e~ent ~g,eement Payments
Ot~er !xpenditures
Reserves ' Carry-Over to Next Ye4r
Sext Y~•r'• Ory Per i od fundin<j Requirements
:-und 9al411ee or (~!lcl t)
90Sll !'t.=(Sl
Reserves ' C4rry-Over !rem. t..!:st Year
~
':'.>.x Levy
!ntecest ' ~i sce llaneous Incom e
Ot."ler Income
Send Pr1ncipi4l ' Interest
Oc..~e c !xpendltu.res
':'OT 1.!. !::< ?e. 'Ill I ':'UR!:S
Reserves ' C3rry-¢ver to Sext YeAr
sext Yeac'• Dry Period !'undin<j Requicement•
fu.~d Sal.11\ce o c (De !telt)
~ (Ad justed for Inter-!'und Transfers)
ReS<?cves • Ca r ry-¢ver F com t.>st Year
".'0'!'1.!. !L~JE
1'01'.L A VA! U.!IL.? !'CS!l I SG
'!'OTA!. !:X Pell> t '!"."llES
Res~cves ~ C~cry-Ovec to ~ext Ye4r
~ext Year's Ocy Per1od Pundinq Requirements
!'t.~ 11.\LJ..'IC~ OR (0~ IC IT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT HO. 6
S T.\~~elT 0!' PROJECTED C.\SH now
!'!SC!U. Y!:.\RS 1982-83 '!'l!ROUCH 1986-87
438 ,000
711,000
23,000
33,000
579 ,000
1,346 ,000
1,78 4,000
954 ,000
190,000
l,lH,000
640 ,000
572,000
68,000
3,469,000
U0,000
50,000
l0,000
lJ ,000
268,000
78 l , 000
4,250,000
945 ,000
129 ,000
579,000
l,653,000
2 ,597 ,000
2,597,000
29,000
26 ,ooo
2 ,000
28 ,000
57 , 000
30,000
30,000
27,000
27 ,000
-0-
3,936 ,000
2 ,155,000
6 ,091 ,000
2,827,000
) • 264 ,ooo
599 ,000
2 ,665 ,00 0
640,000
782,000
26 ,000
H,000
851,000
1,246,000
147 ,000
l,393 ,000
98,000
696,000
(598,000)
2,597,000
70,000
so ,000
l2,000
543,000
274 ,000
949,000
l ,419 ,000
909,000
2 ,328,000
1 ,218,000
l,2l8,000
27 ,000
26 ,000
2 ,000
28 ,000
55 ,000
29. 000
29 ,000
26,000
26 ,000
-o-
3,26 4 ,000
1,828 ,ooo
5 ,092 ,000
3,750,000
l,342,000
722 ,000
620,000
98,000
876,000
30 ,000
30,000
936 ,000
l,034 ,000
1,4 )),000
168,000
1,601,000
(567 ,000)
800,000
(l,36 7 ,000)
l,218,000
263,000
100,000
14 ,ooo
32,000
153,000
562 ,000
1,780,000
2 ,046,000
1 ,150 ,000
3,196,000
(l , 416. 000)
(l ,416 ,000)
26,000
25 ,000
2,000
27 ,ooo
53,000
28 ,000
28. 000
25 ,000
25,000
-o-
l,342,000
1 ,525,000
2 ,867,000
4,825 ,000
(l,958,000)
825 ,000
!2, 7!3 ,000)
(567,000)
981,000
35,000
l ,016 ,0 00
44 9 I 000
1 ,648,000
192,000
1 ,840,000
(l,391,000)
920,000
(2,311,000)
(l,416,000)
526 ,ooo
150,000
16 ,000
21,000
713 ,000
(703 ,000)
2,922 ,000
l,975 ,000
4 ,897 ,000
(5 ,600,000)
(S ,600 ,000)
25 ,000
35 ,000
2,000
37,000
62,000
32 ,000
32,000
30,000
)0,000
-o-
(l ,958,000 )
1,766,000
(192,000)
6,769,000
(6,961,000)
950,000
(7 ,911,000)
7/19/82
1/19/83 -Revised
l,099,000
40,000
l, 139 f 000
(2 52,000)
l,895,000
200,000
2. 095. 000
(2,347 ,000)
l,0 48,000
p,395,000)
(5 ,600 ,000)
657,000
200,000
18. 000
700,000
l,575,000
(4,025,000)
l, 73 4 ,ODO
3,051,DDO
4,785,000
(8 ,810,000 )
(8,810,000)
30,000
29,000
2,000
31,000
61,000
31,000
31,000
30 ,000
l0,000
-o-
(6 ,961 ,000)
2,745,000
(4 ,216 ,000)
6 ,911,000
(ll,127,000)
l ,078 ,000
(12,205,000)
S-Year Total
438 ,ooo
4 ,44 9 ,000
154,000
106 ,000
579,000
5,288,000
5, 726 ,000
7,176,000
897,000
8,073,000
(2,347 ,000)
1,048,000
(3,395,000)
3,469,000
1,956,000
550,000
70,000
1,309,000
695,000
4 ,580 ,000
8 ,049,000
9,066 ,000
7 ,2H ,000
579 ,ODO
16 I 859 . ODO
(8,810,000)
(8, 810, ODO)
29,000
141 ,000
10 ,000
151,000
180,000
150,000
150 ,000
30,000
30 ,000
-o-
3,936,000
l0,019,000
lJ,955,000
25,082,000
(ll ,127 ,000)
l , 018 t 0 00
(12,205,000)
flla.l!14I~R't Til"ETABI..£ F'OA ~~ Atn ItFOftCATIC»f CF USER F'EE
TO B£ COWCTED CN PR'JPERTY Tt.X BILL
DISTRICT 6, 19!\J-94
~[~T DISTRICT 6/COSTA "Es.\ SNdTAR'f DISTRICT APPA'.llCH
I ;,naiy:e X!Grnative user f'ee ii!Pleae"lfat!cn I Cln:l!OtS .ni ~t user Yee Aste StlAy
P ee
A!tern&thes/
Direct surrs To
Proceed
MAR• APR 9'
n rence
EstabUshlnq user Fee/
Fhlnq N>llc tearlnq
Date on user Fee Aepart
grai: ett' nq o 11 rac
Parcel Data F'roai CCU'lty Tax "2115 TO
Provlae AeGJ1rC'd N:Jtlce/Oevelop user
Fee Data Basd/Cross-Aeference 'dth CMS>
I "'-· ""''" "" """' ,,.,_,. """" "" rue "'"' '"""' A.AJltor
MAY • .lM 83
ree SChlellle • llLlth.
COllectlcn Of user
Fee 0\ T•• 8111
1/19/SJ
.l.JLY • IUa 83
0
Adgpted Rates
To Colrlty ~ltor
Oontroller
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
Consideration of Long -Range Financial Requirements
DISCUSSION OUTLINE
A. Review 5-Year Financia l Projection s
1. Operating Shortfall -$3 .4 million (See Schedule A)
2. Capital Shor tfall -$8 .8 milli on (See Schedule A)
B. Financ i ng Alternatives
1 . Operating Revenue
a. Ad valorem taxes
1 /25/83
(1 ) Share of 1% all ocation (cur ren t source = $711 ,000/year)
(2) Election to authorize separate ad valorem tax levy
{four -year limit)
b. Use r fees & basis for fee {See attached Ta ble III-1 excerpted from
Revenue Program ) -
(1) Hearing and separate levy of special assessment
{user charge) on the property tax bill
(2) Separate use r charge collected on water pu r veyors
utility bill
(3) Direct billing by Districts of separ ate user charge
2. Capital Funding
Source Application Policy
a. Capital element added Imp r ovements
to User Charge {B.l.b. above) Reconstruction
b. Connection Fees Expans i on
c. Revenue Bonds Improvements
Reconstruction
d . Loans Expansion
e . Election to authorize Improvements
separate ad valorem tax levy Reconstruction
f. Special Assessment District Expansion
g . Grant Funds (limited) Improvements
3. Other Co n siderations Affecting Long-Range Fund i ng Requirements
-1-
C. Staff Recommendation
1. Special assessment (user charge) to be collected on property tax bill
(See Schedule B)
a. Supplements current 1% ad valorem tax apportionment
b. Recommended charge (preliminary)
Single-Family
Dwellings
Multiple-Family
Dwellings
Commercial/
Industrial
Basis of
Charge
Annual
Rate
Flat $26.40
1, 0 0 0 sq. ft. 18 • 9 0
of building
1,000 sq. ft. 18.90
of building
Operation Appropriations (5-Year Average)
Capital Appropriations (5-Year Average)
c. Data Base -County Assessor's Property Roll
2. Connection Fee Revision
a. Current Fee Schedule
(1) Residential $250/unit
(2) Commercial $625/acre
b. Recommended Fee Schedule
(1) Residential $500/unit
(2) Commercial $100/1000 sq. ft.
D. Costa Mesa Sanitary District Joint Participation
Minimum
Annual
Charge
Per Unit
$26.40
15.85
26.40
Est'd Total
Annual Fees
$727,000
506,000
357,000
$1,590,000
53%
47
100%
E. Timetable for Implementation of User Fee Program (see Schedule C)
F. Discussion
-2-
i i
G. Suggested Board Actions for Consideration
1. Direct staff to proceed with planning for implementation of a special
assessment (user fee) to be collected on the property tax bill
2. Approve tentative timetable for implementation of user fee program
3. Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with the Orange
County Assessor's Office for computer progranuning to provide data base
information, mailing labels and parcel charge tapes relative to user
fee to be collected on the property tax bill, for an amount not to
exceed $50,000.
4. Direct staff to draft a revision to the connection charge ordinance for
first reading on February 9, 1983.
a. Increase the connection fee from $250 to $500 per dwelling unit for
residential properties
b. Change the basis for commercial/industrial properties from acreage
to square footage of improvements (buildings) and fix f ee at
$100/1000 square feet.
-3-
.__.
t-t ....
• (J1
(
Billing Alternative
l. Separate charge as a
spec i a I asscss111ent on
the property tax bill.
2. Separate charge collectell.
on \va ter p1arvc)1 01·' s utl Ii ty
l> i'I ling.
TABLH 1l-1 (
ALTERNATIVE Pl.ANS FOR USER CllARGl!S WHEN
AV TAXES ARI: INSUFFICll!NT TO PAY OM&R COSTS
Probable Calculation Method
l. Subdivide user classes into sub-
clusses such as single f:unily and
multi-family d\tlel lings, C'ffice
buildings, small commercial estab-
lishments, etc., and calculate flat
· rates attendant to each based on
average discharges and syste111 loading
from representative samplings.
2. Base charge on \-1ater volu111e
·other Major Relevant Issues
,-r-
1. (a) Current Statutory authority <~xlsts
(b) Requires a pliblic hearing nnd separate
notice of said headng to all properly
0\'111Cl"S.
(c) Utilizes existing ·assessor fi I e as data
base and tax bill ns billing mechanism.
llC'wever, data base h'oul<l require sub-
stantial annual update at Districts'
expense and conversion to a computer
tape input by Uistricts to assess
charge on tai bill.
(cl) Inaccuracy of Assessor's tlata base mny
rcsul t in high percent of hi 11 ing
errors amt recau ire a customer service
function .
(e) Unsewercd properties could be reflected
in rate structure once identified and/
or separate provisions made for rebate.
{f) Maximum charge for tax collector's
service is establisheJ at $5/account or
1% of collections, whichever is greater.
{g) Low de 1 inquency factor.
(h) Cash flm~ is not spread even I y.
(i) l~ou I J satisfy not if i cul ion requi rcmcn ts
2. (a) Current statutory authodty exists.
llowever, it is permissive, not mandat-
ory for the '"'at er ut ii Hy.
(b) l'Jould not re(1ulre a public hearing.
(c) Would re<1uirc contractual arrangements
and system modifications '"ith approx-
imately ISO water purveyors.
(Continue<l)
.. ,
~)
t-t
H
H • 0\
(
Billing Alternative
2. (Cont' <l.)
l. Olrect billing by CSDOC
( (
TABLE I 11-1 (Cont• d)
Probable Calculation Method Other Major ltelevnnt Issues
3. Same as I. above utilizing
assessor's files as the data
base source ..
(d) Would require a minimum of data,base
maintenance by the Districts as this
•muld be automatically done by the
'"ater utility. llmrnvcr, separate
arrongements may have to be mac.le with
the utility to reflect loadings of
small commercial estuhlishments.
(e) Charge more directly associated with
actual use (assuming use is related
to water consumptiou).
(f) Unse\-1ered prnpert ies would have to he
identified and a system exception or
rebate provisjon made.
(g) lligh delinquency.
{h) Cost of service by utility is unknown
and \olould have to ·1>e negotiated or
established by code amendments.
(i) Cash flow would be more uniform.
(j) lVould satisfy notificat.ion require-
ments.
3. (a) Current statutory authority exists.
{b) Would require installation of expen-
sive computerized billing system·and·
associated personnel and administra-
tive costs or contrncting with an
outside bureau.
(c) Most costly method.
{d) Requires extensive data base main-
maintenance.
(e) Inaccuracy of data base source may
result in high. percent of bi Hing
errors.
(Continued)
.. ,
~~
H
H
t-t
I -·
(
Bil li.!_lg Alternative
3. (Cont 1 d . )
4. Impose a Separate
AV Tax Levy
(
TABLE I 11-1 (Cont• <l)
Probable Calculation Method
~
4. Based on property value
{
0th er Maj or lte l evan t_l_s_s_u_e_s __ ~---
( f) Unsewered properties could be tefJ~cted
in rate structure once identified and/
or separate provision 111aJe for rebate.
(g) Expected delinquency factor woulJ be
highest.
(h) Cash flow impact wouJJ be hased on
determination of billing frequency.
(i) Would satisfy notification re<1ui rcmcnt ~-
4. (a) Requires 2/3 voter approval
{b) lJnseHereJ property issue a-1ould have t.o
be resolved
(c) l..ow ·delinquency factor
(d) Most cost effective method
( e) Cash flow not sprea~ evenly
(f) Would satisfy notification requirements.
(g) l..east ec1uitable
-.,
;1
COUNTY SANITAl 1or~ Dt~1: µ,,, ..
of ORANGE CourHY. CALIFOFlrW
PO BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714)54(}2910
(714)962-2411 •
January 26, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: Supervisor Roger Stanton
SUBJECT: District No. 6 Board Actions Re Long-Range Financing
As you were unable to attend the District No. 6 Meeting on January 25th, I would
like to report to you what actions the Directors took at that meeting. The
enclosed information regarding the Districts' projected revenue shortfalls was
reviewed with the Board in considerable detail. At the conclusion of the
two-hour session the Board declared its intent to proceed with implementation of
a user fee program beginning in 1983-84 and approved the actions set forth on
Page 3 of the Discussion Outline.
As you may be aware, the Costa Mesa Sanitary District is also planning to
implement a user charge in 1983-84. Because both agencies provide similar
services, we feel that separate public information programs concerning the
proposals and the respective roles we play in providing sewer service might be
confusing to the public. We have, therefore, suggested to the Sanitary District
that a joint effort might be more meaningful to the general public and possibly
result in some mutual cost savings by sharing expenses. The Board has,
therefore, authorized us to advise the Sanitary District that District No. 6 is
proceeding with .implementation of its user fee program and ask if they wish to
participate in a joint public presentation of our proposals.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
JWS:dt
Enclosures
J. Wayne Sylvester
Assistant General Manager
~
--
MEETING DA H Jan· 25 ' l 9B3
DISTRICT 1
TIME 5:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 6
-------------------~
~CRANK), t,,,,,, HANSON,,,,,•--
BRICK~NJ. I •••• LUXEMBOURGER __ EDGAR ,,,,,,,,SALTARELLI,, ___
RILEY ,,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ______ __
DISTRICT 2
MC ROBERTS). I .WEDAA. I I ••• -._ -----
OVERHOLJ), I. I .ROTH ••• I,·,.·----NIELSEN),,,,,,BROWN,,,,,,, ___ _
KUZNl~),,,,,,,HOLT,,,,,,,, ______ ____ HICKS ,,,,,,,,ISLES,,,,,,, ____ _
ODLUM •t••••11KAWANAMl1•••--__ __
BRICKE~J, I I. I .LUXEMBOURGER __ --
WIEDER ,,,,,,,NESTANDE11••------· __ CULVER ,,,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,, ________ __
BEYER),•t•••••SMITH,,,,,,, _________ __
HOLMBERGJ,,,,,WEDEL,,,,,,, ________ _
CATLIN),,,,,,,WINTERS,,,,, ______ __
DISTRICT 3
EDWARDS),,,t,,FINLAYSON,,, _____ _
VANDERSJAAY I •• LASZLO. I I I.·-------NIELSEN ,,,,,,ADLER,,,,,,, ______ ____
PERRY)t•••••••CULVER,,,,,, ________ __
SEIDELJJ,,,,,,fRESE,,,,,,, ______ __
JARRELL ,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,,,, _____ _
BRICKEl ,,,,,,LUXEMBOURGER FINLEY ,,,,,,,MANDIC,,,,,,:::::::::::::::: LACAYO ,,,,,,,MULLEN,,,,,, __________ __
COOPER •t•••••NELSON,,,,,, __________ __
MARSHOTT1,,,,,RELL1•••••••----______ __ WEDEL),•t•••••ROGET,,,,,,, ________ ____
OVERHOLT J ..... ROTH. I. I I I I·------------ZOMHICK) t • • • • • SYLVl A •••••• _______ __ NESTANOEJ,,,,,WIEDER,,,,,, ________ __
CATLJN),,,,,,,WJNTERS,,,,, _________ __
DISTRICT 5
~cox>t·········HART •••••••• ____ --------AGEEJ11 ,,,,,,MAURER,,,,,, _______ __
STANTONS,,,,,,RILEY,,,,,,, ___ ---___
DISTRICT 6 1-\-4
~CRANg),,,,,,,,HUTCHISON.,.~ ~ ~
HART) t I • I I I I I I PL UHM ER. • • • • v _i..._ --L...
R IL EY J •••••••• ST ANTON ••••• --iv---=-___
DISTRICT 7
SALTARELLI),. I EDGAR. I I I I I·--------BEYER) •••••••• SMITH ••••••• ________ _
HART),,,,,,,,,HEATHER,,,,, ________ __
BRICKEtU .... I .LUXEMBOURGER __ ---WIEDE1),,,,,,,NESTAND£,,,, _______ _
AGRAN ,,,,,,,,VARDOULJS,,, ________ _
GREEN ,,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,, ________ _
DISTRICT 11
~MAC ALLISTER),BAILEY,,,,,, _______ ____
NESTANDE),,,,,WIEDER,,,,i, ________ __
MAC ALLISTERJ,PATTINSON,, , ____ ____
1/17/83
JOINT BOARDS
NIELSEN),,,,t,ADLER,,,,,,, ___
MAC ALLISTERJ,BAILEY,,,,,, NIELS~N),,,,,,BROWN,,,,,,,:::::::::: PERRY ,,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,, ____ ~
SHARP •t•••••1EDGAR1••••••---___ EDWARDSJ,,,,,,FJNLAYSON,,, ___ ·~ SEIDEL),,,,,,,fRES£,,,,,,, ___ ___
JARRELLJ,,,,,,GRIFFJN,,,,, ____ ___
CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,,
cox>t·········HART •••••••• :::::::::: HARTJ,,,,,,,,,HEATHER,,,,,
KUZNllJ,,,,,,,HOLT,,,,1111 ::::::::::: CRANK ,,,,,,,,HUTCHISON,,, ____ ___
HICKS ,,,,,,,,JSLES,,,,,,, ____ ___
ODLUM •••••t••KAWANAMJ,,,, ____ ____
VANDERSJAAYl11LASZL011•••• BRICKEN),,,,,,LUXEMBOURGER::::: ---
FINLEY),,,,,,,MANDIC,,,,,,
AGEE),i••••••1MAURER,,,,,,:::: LACAYO ,,,,,,,MULLEN,,,,,, ___
COOPER ,,,,,,,NELSON,,,,,, __ __
WIEDER •••••t•NESTANDE,,,, __ __
MAC ALLISTERJ,PATTINSON ... __
CULVER),,,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,,
HART),,,,,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,,:::::
MARSHOTJ1,,,,,RELL1••••••• STANTON),,,,,,RILEY,,,,,,,:::::: ---
WEDEL),, t• ••• 1ROGET1111•••---
OVERH1LT1,,,,,ROTH11••••••----EDGAR ,,,,,,,,SALTARELLI., __ __
BEYER ,,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,, __ __
RILEY •t•••••1STANTON,,,,, ____ ZOMMl~KJ,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,,::::: ___ AGRAN ,,,,,,,,VARDOULJS,,, _____ __
GREEN ,,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,, ______ __
!MC RO&ERTSJ,,,WEDAA,,,,,,, __
ROGET),,,,,,,,WEDEL,,,,,,,::::: __ __
NESTANOEJ,,,,,WIEDER,,,,,, ____
(CATLIN),,,,,,,WINTERS,,,,,:::: ___
OTHERS:
HARPER,,,,,,~
SYLVESTER. I. __ ./
LEWIS,,,,,,, ___
CLARKE,,,,,,~ DAWES,,,,,,, __ v __
ANDERSON,,,, BUTLER,,,,,,--;r-___
BROWN,,,,,,, ____ ___
BAKER,,,,,,, ____ __
ATKINSON,,,, _____ __
YOUNG,,,,,,, ______ __
WOODRUFF,,,,::::: HOHENER,,,,, __ __
HOWARD,,,,,, __ __
HUNT,,,,,,,, __ __
KEITH,,,,,,, __ __
KNOPF,,,,,,, __ __
LE BLANC,,,, __ __
LINDSTROM. I·--LYNCH ••••••• __ __
MARTINSON,,, ___ _
PEARCE,,,,,, _____ __
EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
An adjoured regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts No. 6 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 5:30 p.m.,
January 25, 1983, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Authorizing issuance of purchase
order to County Assessor re data
processing support services for
user fee program
Following a brief discussion of the data
processing support required to implement
the user fee program, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute an agreement
with the Orange County Assessor's Office for computer progranuning and processing
to provide data base information, mailing labels and parcel charge tapes relative
to user fees to be collected on the property tax bill, for an amount not to exceed
$50,000.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, WILLIAM B. BUTLER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 6 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said
Board of Directors on the 25th day of January, 1983.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of May, 1983.
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
January 25, 1983 -5:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of January 12, 1983, the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California met in an
adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative
offices.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. The roll was called and the
Secretary reporte~ a quorum present.
DIREX::TORS PRESENT:
DIRD:TORS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRFSENT:
'-eltaff Report on Long-Range
Financing
Elvin Hutchison, Chairman, Ruthelyn
Plummer
Roger Stanton
J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General
Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary,
Thomas M. Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer
The Assistant General Manager reviewed
the 5-year financial projections for the
District and highlighted the anticipated
shortfalls in both operating and capital funds during this period. Because of
rapidly escalating costs to meet federal and state mandated requirements, revenues
from current sources will be inadequate and the District faces a serious financial
problem that unless resolved could jeopardize the integrity of the sewerage
system. Mr. Sylvester then briefly outlined the financing alternatives available
to the Board for establishment of a user fee to supplement ad valorem tax revenues
to meet operating requirements and various capital financing alternatives to
support District collection system and joint treatment works capital requirements.
Mr. Sylvester advised the Directors that the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, the local
sewerage agency which operates most of the street sewer system within District 6, is
also considering establishment and implementation of a user fee in fiscal year
1983-84. Because both agencies provide similar services, they may wish to consider a
joint public presentation of the proposals and the respective roles of each District
in providing sewerage services to the community.
The Board entered into a lengthy discussion of the merits of the various operating
and capital financing alternatives as well as the procedural requirements and
timetables involved in implementation of a user fee program, including holding joint
public hearings with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District to assist property owners in
understanding the nature and purpose of the proposed fees.
Declaring intent to adopt user It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
fee program and apProving
implementation schedule That the Board of Directors hereby
declares its intent to adopt a user fee
program and to levy a special assessment (user fee) to be collected on the
property tax bill beginning with the 1983-84 fiscal year; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to proceed with implementation of said
user fee program in accorance with the preliminary timetable for development and
implementation of a user fee to be collected on the property tax bill dated January
19' 1983.
Authorizing issuance of purchase
order to County Assessor re data
processing support services for
user fee program
Following a brief discussion of the data
processing support required to implement
the user fee program, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute an agreement
with the Orange County Assessor's Office for computer proqranuning and processing
to provide data base information, mailing labels and parcel charge tapes relative
to user fees to be collected on the property tax bill, for an amount not to exceed
$50,000.
Authorizing the General Manager
to invite Costa Mesa Sanitary
District's participation in a
joint public presentation re
proposed user fee programs
joint public presentation of the
Directing staff to draft revisions
to connection fee ordinance
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is
hereby, authorized to formally invite
Costa Mesa Sanitary District to
participate with District No. 6 in a
respective user fee proposals.
Following a staff report on capital
financing requirements it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to draft a revision to the
Districts' connection fee ordinance to increase the connection fee from $250 to
$500 per dwelling unit for residential properties and change the basis for
commercial/industrial properties from acreage to square footage of improvements
(buildings) and fix the fee at $100/1000 square feet.
FURTHER MOVED: That said ordinance be submitted for the Board's consideration at the
next regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, February 9, 1983.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:33 p.m.
1Jt&.· //~-
Secretary of the BoartOf Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California
-2-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Califomia
DISTR/C.T, No. 6
ADJOURNED .. REGULAR.MEETING
TUESDAY J JANUARY 25 J 1983 -5: 30 p IM .•
(1) Roll call
· (2) Staff report on long-range financial obligations:
(a) Operating and Maintenance requirements
(b) Capital requirements
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area.Code 714
540-29.10
962-2411
AGENDA
(3) Discussion re alternative means of funding District's long-range
financial needs
(4)
(5)
(6)
Consideration of action directing staff to proceed. with selected
financing alternative
Other business and communications, if any
. (
Consid~ration of motion to adjourn '1 ~.'l"
(
8
9
10
11
12
ll
H
15
16
11
lt1
19
20
:?l
22
2J
~
25
4:6
27
28
29
JO
Jl
32
33
J.&
JS
36
J7
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
'-.../ 50
DESCRIPTION
01'1'!RATISG FU?I>
Reserves • Carry-Over From Last Year
~
Sh4re of l' Tax Allocation
Fees
Interest • Miscellaneous Income
Other Revenue
TOTAL R..~J~
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
EXPEND I TURES
Sh4re o! Joint Works M • 0
Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
Other £xpenditures
TOTAL ~"(Pf:SOITURES
Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year
Next Year's Ory Period Funding Requirements
Fund Balance or (Deficit)
CAPITAL FUND(S)
Reserves & Carry-over From Last Year
~
Construction Grants
Fees: ~vnnection
Other
Sale of Capacity Rights
Interest & Miscellaneous Income
Other :ncome
TOTAL REVENUE
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
EXPENDITUtm;
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant
District Collection System
Reimbursement Agreement Payments
Other Expenditures
TOTAL EX~I'!'UR!S
Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year
Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
Fund Balance or (Oe!icitl
BONO F'l.'N!> ( S )
Reserves & Carry-Over Prom Last Year
~
Tax Levy
Interest & Miscellaneous Income
Other InCC1111e
'l'OTAL RE\mruE
'l'OTA!. AVi\I t.AB!..f! FUND ING
EXPEND I TURES
Bond Principal & Interest
Other Expenditures
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year
Sext Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
Fund Bal.!nce or (Deficit)
~ (Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers)
Reserves & Carry-Over From Last Year
TOTAL R..vwmlE
TOTAL AVAIU.BLE FmmING
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year
Next Year's Dry Period Fundin<J Requirements
FUND BALA!~CE OR (DEFICIT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
ST!\rEM™T OF PROJECTED CASH PLOW
FISCAL YEARS l982-8J THROUGH 1986-87
438 ,ooo
711,000
2J,OOO
JJ,000
579 ,ooo
1,346,000
1,784,000
954,000
190,000
1,144,000
640,000
572,000
68,000
3,469,000
440,000
50,000
10,000
13,000
268,000
781,000
4,250,000
945,000
129,000
579,000
l,65J,OOO
2,597,000
2,597,000
29,000
26,000
2,000
28,000
57 ,000
30,000
30,000
27,000
27 ,000
-o-
3,936,000
2,155,000
6,091,000
2,827,000
3,264,000
599,000
2,665,000
640,000
782,000
26,000
4J,OOO
851,000
1,491,000
1,246,000
147 ,ooo
1,393,000
98,000
696,000
(598,000)
2,597,000
70,000
50,000
12,000
543,000
274,000
949,000
3,546,000
l,"19,000
909,000
2,328,000
1,218,000
1,218,000
27,000
26,000
2,000
28,000
55,000
29,000
29,000
26,000
26,000
-o-
3,264,000
1,828 ,ooo
5,092,000
3,750,000
1,342,000
722,000
620,000
98,000
876,000
30,000
30,000
936,000
1,034,000
1,433,000
168,000
1,601,000
(567 ,000)
800,000
(1,367,000)
1,218,000
263,000
100,000
14 ,ooo
32,000
153,000
562,000
1,780,000
2,046,000
1,150,000
3,196,000
(1,416,000)
(1,416 ,000)
26,000
25,000
2,000
27,000
53,000
28,000
28,000
25,000
25,000
-o-
1,342,000
1,525,000
2,867,000
4,825,000
(l,958,000)
825,000
(2,783,000)
(567,000)
981,000
35,000
1,016,000
449,000
1,648,000
192,000
1,840,000
(l,391,000)
920,000
(2,311,000)
(l,416,000)
526,000
150,000
16,000
21,000
713,000
(703,000)
2,922,000
1,975,000
4,897,000
(5,600,000)
(5,600,000)
25,000
35,000
2,000
37,000
62,000
32,000
32,000
30,000
30,000
-o-
(1,958,000)
1,766,000
(192,000)
6,769,000
(6,961,000)
950,000
(7 ,911,000)
7/19/82
1/19/83 -~vised
(1,391,000)
1,099,000
40,000
1,139,000
!252,000)
1,895,000
200,000
2,095,000
(2,347,000)
l,048,000
(3 ,395 ,000)
(5,600,000)
657,000
200,000
18,000
700,000
1,575,000
(4,025,000)
1,734,000
3,051,000
4,785,000
(8,810,000)
(8,810 ,000)
30,000
29,000
2,000
31,000
61,000
31,000
31,000
30,000
30,000
-o-
(6,961,000)
2,745,000
(4,216,000)
6,911,000
(11,127,000)
1,078,000
(12,205,000)
S-Year Total
438,000
4,449,000
154,000
106,000
579,000
5,288,000
5,726,000
7,176,000
897,000
8,073,000
(2,347 ,000)
1,048,000
(3,395,000)
3,469,000
1,956,000
550,000
70,000
1,309,000
695,000
4,580,000
8,049,000
9,066,000
7,214,000
579,000
16,859,000
(8,810,000)
(8,810,000)
29,000
Ul,000
10,000
151,000
180,000
150,000
150,000
30,000
30,000
-o-
3,936,000
10,019,000
13,955,000
25,082,000
(ll,127 ,000)
1,078,000
(12,205,000)