The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-11-17 (2, 3 and 11)COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 12, 1982 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 2) 3 & 11 WEDNESDAY·' NOVEMBER 17 J 1982 -7: 00 p IM I 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of November 10, 1982, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 will meet in an adjourned meeting at the above hour and date. The meeting will be a study session regarding the updated and consolidated Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for the Districts. A Preliminary Draft of the plan prepared by Lowry & Associates was mailed to Directors with the November Board Meeting agenda material. ~~ Assistant Board Secretary TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS -:o County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT Nos 2, 3 & 11 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cal if., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1982 -7:00 P.M. (1) Roll call m17 (2> (3) Consideration of motion appointing Rita Brown Secretary pro tern DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Cons i deration of mo t ion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Brea re election of mayor and interim appointment of alternate Director, and seating new members of the Board, as follows: (*Ma yor) Dist rict (s) Active Alternate 2 & 3 Carrey J. Nelson Norma A. Hick s* Report of Engineer re updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for the Districts (5) Discussion ~ d. 3~ \ l (6) --eonsiderati on of motion to refer the draft updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 & 11 to the Special .MJ ~ Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts and to the Fiscal Policy Committe e for study and recommendation (7) ~~ss_grui_cemmunications, i f any (8) Cons i deration o f motion to adjou r n 1:"fo :;J· ~ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS _ ·• County Sanitation Districts . Post Office Box 8127 p of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: II DISTRICT Nos 2 ~ 3 & 11 Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY~ NOVEMBER 17 ~ l982 -7: 00 p .!MI (1) Roll call (2) Consideration of motion appointing Rita Brown Secretary pro tem (3) DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Brea re election of mayor and interim appointment of alternate Director, and seating new members of the Board,; as follows: (*Mayor) District (s) Active Alternate 2 & 3 Carrey J. Nelson Norma A. Hicks* (4) Report of Engineer re updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for the Districts (5) Discussion (6) Consideration of motion to.refer the draft updated and con~olidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 & 11 to the\ Special Conunittee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Distribts and to the Fiscal Policy Committee for study and recommendation i I i (7) Other business and CODDDunications, if any (8) Consideration of motion to adjourn J-.f 0 ' h~ ".r ! v<-/dL-\ J u !.C' ----t I -..... ----- i ----------------------- -=----~-=-=~~------------------------------~-. ~~---------~ - ----.--..-----,------------- ~---------~ ------------......, -----~-----~--~--------~-- l MEETI NG DA TE Nov . 17 , 1982 DISTR ICT 1 TI ME 7 :00 p.m . DI S TRI CT S 2 , 3 & 11 (CR AN K). t •• ,,,, HA NSOI\,, ••• , (BRICKEN J ,.,,, ,L UX EMBO URG ER-- ( ED GAR),.,, , , , , S AL TA RELLI , , -- (R I LE Y),,,,,,, ,ST AN TON ,,,,·== DISTRICT 2 (MC ROB ERTS ),,, WEDAA.,.,., .~ (OVE RHO LT ),,, ,,ROTH ,,,,, ••• ~- (NIEL S E~)., ,,, ,BROWN ,,,,,,.~== (KUZNI K),,,,,,, H OLT,,,.,,,.~ ODL UM ).t ••••••K AWANAMJ ,,,,~ -- BRIC K ~N J ,, ,, , .L UX EMBOURGE R~ HIC KS) l' •••• I . NE LSON ••••• ·~ WIEDE RJ , ,, , , ,,NESTANDE •• , .~ CUL VE R),,,,,,, PERRY,,.,,,·~ BE YER ).'l'''''SMITH,,,,,,, ~ ( HOLMBER GJ ••••• WEDEL ••• I I. ·....lL.. (CATL IN) •••• I I .WINTERS ••••• ~ DISTR ICT 3 (EDWARDS),,,l,rFHIU.¥€QMnl ,, t/' (VANDE RSTAA YJ ,.LASZLO •• ,, •• ~ ~NIELS~N),,, ,,,A DL ER,,,,,,, V-- PERR Y) l,,,,,,, CUL VER ,,,,, , ..J.L SEIDEL J ,,,,,, ,FRESE,,,,,., I../' JARRELL) •••• I I GR I FF IN I I I •• --v BRIC KEN ) ••• I I .LU XEMB OURGER 15'--- FINLEY),,,,,, .MANDIC , ,, ,, , ROWAN ),,,,,, ,,MUL L EN .,,,, ,--c;:" -- HIC KS ),' l' •••• NE L SON . I. I I·~== MARSHOTTJ •• I •• RELL ••••••• I v"" (WE D EL ),•t •••••~•••••••~ -- (OVER HO LTJ,, ,,,ROTH ,,,,,,,,~ -- ( ZOMM I c K) l ••• I • s YL v I A. • • • • • -- (NEST AN DE J , ,,,,WIE DER •• ,,, ,-a;-== (CATLIN ),,,,, ,,W I NTER S .,,,.~ __ DISTRICT 5 (MAURER),,,, ,,,HEA THER ,,,,, (STRA USS ),,,,, .COX ,,,,,,,,.-- (STANTON ),,, I •• RILE Y ••••••• == DISTRICT 6 (C RAN K). l ' II ••• HUTCHISON ••• (H.EATH~R J , ,, , , ,PL UMMER ,,,,.-- (RI L EY). I I •• I I I STANTON. I. I ·== DIST RICT 7 (S ALT ARELLI),, ,E DGAR •• ,,,,, (BE y ER ) • l ••••• I SM I TH . I •• I •• = (H EATHERJ •••• I. HART •• I ••••• (BRIC KEN).,,,, .L UXEMBO UR GER -- (W I EDER ),,,.,,, NE S TAN DE,,, .-- ( AGRAN ),, ,, ,, , ,VARDOULIS ••• -- (GREEN ),,,, ,,,,WAHNER ,,••••= DISTRICT 11 (MAC ALLISTER),BAI LE Y. I •••• ~ (NESTANDE ) I. I l 'WI EDER ••• I I ,C:C- (MAC ALLISTERJ ,PATTIN SON , ··~ 11/17 /8 2 -----------~ JOINT BOARDS (N I EL SEN ),.,, •• ADLE R ••••• ,, (MAC ALLJ STE R),BAILE Y.,,,, .-- (NI ELSEN ), I •••• BROWN ••••••• -- (S TRAUSS), • , , , , CO X. , , , , , , , , -- ( PER RY ) •• , , • , •• CULV ER ••• , • , -- (SH ARP )' l ' •• ' 'I EDGA R •••• I'·== (EDW ARD S>.,,, •• F IN L AYSON,,, (SEIDEL )l ',,,, ,F RES E.,,,,,.-- (JARRE l,.L J.,,,,, GR I FF I N,,,,.-- (CRAN K)' l ' ••••• HAN SO N •• I I •• -- (HEA T HER J . , , , , , HART. , , , , , , , -- (MA URE R) •• I •••• HEAT HER ••••• -- (KU ZNJ K) •• ,, , , .HOLT,,,,,,,.-- (CRAN K),,,,,,,, HUTCH I SON ,,·== (OD L UM) •••••••• KAWA NAMJ ••• I ( VANDERSTAA Y),. LASZLO,,,,, .-- (B R I CKEN),,, , , , LU XEMBOU RGE R-- (F I NLE Y),,,,,, .MA NDI C,., ••• -- ~ROWAN ),,,.,,,, MULLEN ,,,,,.-- HICKS) l '' ,,, , ,NEL SON ,,,,,·== WIEDERJ •••• 'l 'NESTANDE •• I I (MAC ALLI S TER J .PATTINSON. I.-- (CU L VER)l ' •••• I PERRY. I •• I I.-- (HEATHER) l I •••• PL LIMMER ••••• -- (MARSHOTT) I •••• RELL ••••••• ·== (S TANTON),,, I •• RIL EY. II I I I I (WEDE L).' l '. I •• ROGET ••• I ••• -- (OVERHOLT ). I I I. ROTH ••• I •••• -- (EDGAR), •••• I •• SALTARE LLI •• -- (B EYER ). I I I I ••• SMITH •••• I I.-- (RILEY)' l' •• I •• STANTON , I ••• -- ( ZOMMICKJ , I ••• ,SYLVIA . I I ••• -- (AGRAN), ••• I ••• VARDOULIS. I.-- (GREEN) ••• ' l ' •• WAHNER •••• I.-- (MC ROl!ERTS) ••• WEDAA •• I •• I.-- (ROGE T ),' l' •••• WEDEL ••• I. I.-- (N ESTANDEJ •• I I .WIEDER •• I ••• -- (CAT LIN ),.,,,,, WINTE RS ,,,,.== STAFF: OTHER S: HARPER •• I I. I s YL v Es TE R • I I LEWIS ...... , CLARKE. ••• I I DAWES I I ••• I • ANDERSON •• I • BUT LE R.,,,., BROWN •• ,,,,, BA KER ,,,,,,, AT KINSON,,,, YOUNG,,,,,,, WOO DRU FF, , , , HOHENER,,,,, HOWARD,,,,,, HUNT ,,,,,,,, KEIT H ...... , KNOPF ,,,,,,, LE BLANC ,,,, LINDSTROM ,. , LYNCH •• I I. I. MARTINSON ,,, PEA RCE. I ••• I MEETING DATE Nov . 17, 1982 DISTRICT 1 (CR AN K) I I I I I I I I HANSON I I I I I I (BRIC KEN ), I I., ,L UXEMBOURG ER-- (EDG AR) I ••.• I I I I SA L TARELLI •• -- (RILEY). I •• I. I I STANTON . I I I·== DISTRICT 2 (MC ROBERTS). I .WEDAA . I 1 1 11 I " (OV ER HO LT ) I I. I. ROTH , I I. I I I·~ (NIELSEN ). I I I •• BROWN . I I I II. / (Ku ZN I i() I I I I I I I HOLT I I I I I I I I ./ (O DL UM). II II II I KAW AN AM I II II t/ BR ICK~N), ,,, , ,L UXEMBOURGER iv HIC KS)l' 1111 I .NELSON .,,,,, __ WIEDERJ , I I I I •• NESTANDE . I I, __ CUL VER ) I. I I I I I PERRY I I I I I I I • BE y ER ) • I I I I I I I SM I TH I I I I • I I-"- (HO LMBERG ), I. I .WEDEL .,, I I I,-.!- (CATLIN), I I I I I .WIN TER S . I,,. 1~ DI STR JCT 3 (EDWAR DS) I I I I I I Fttlb\-V-S-GN I I I ,, ( VAND ERSTA AY ) I I LASZLO I I I ,-.,- (NJ E LS~N),,,,,, AD LE R ••• ,,,--:7" (PERR Y) l ' I I I I I ,CULVER. I I 1 1 ,-;- (SEID ELJ, I I II I .FRESE . I I I •• I !JAR RE LL). I I I I I GRIFF !N M . ,--r BRICKEN),,,,, ,L UX EMBOURGER -c.- FINLE Y), I 111 I .MANDIC . I I I I.-.. - ROWAN), I I I II •• MU LLEN, I I I I.-- (H IC KS),,('''' ,NELSO N,,,,,,-- (MARSHOTT J , ''I .RELL •• I. I I I ,-J- (WEDEL).' l' ''I.~. I 1 11, ,-../- (ov ERHOLTJ, ,, , .ROTH .,,,,,,,--;;:::- ~ZOMMICK ), I I I I .SY L VIA . 1 1 11 ,-./- NESTANOE ). 11, ,WI EDER. I I 11 .--z- CATL[N ), 11,,, ,WINTERS . 111 I ,,_. DISTRICT 5 (MAU RER ),, I I I •• HEATH ER •• ,,, (S TRA USS), I I. I .c ox. 1111,,, ,-- (STANTON), I. I I I RI LE Y. I I I.··== DISTRICT 6 (CRANK) I l ' I I I I I HUTCH! SON. I I (H EATH~R J , 1 1 I I I PLUMMER . I I I.-- (RIL EY) I I I I I I. I STANTON . I I I·== DISTRiCT 7 (SA LT AR ELLI), I I EDGAR , I I 11 '' (BEY ER )' l' '',,,SMI TH. I 11 • • ·= (H EAT HER } I I I I I I HAR T. I. I I. I I (BRICKEN),,,,, ,LUXEMBOURGER-- ( w I EDER ) I I I I I I I NEST ANOE I . I.-- ( AGRAN). 111 I I I .VARDOU LIS ••• -- (GR EEN ), 1 1 11 11 .WAHNER . I I···= DISTR[CT ll (MAC ALLISTER),BAILE Y.11111 / (NESTANDE ),,,, .WIEDER . 111 I.-- (MAC ALLISTER). PATTINSON. I.-:-- 11/17 /82 TIME 7 :00 p .m. DISTRICT S 2, 3 & 11 ------------ JO IN T BOARDS (NIELSEN), 11', ,ADLER . 111 •• I (MA C ALLISTER ),BAI L EY 11 II .. -- (N IEL SEN), I II I .BROWN . I I I I I.-- (STRAUSS ),. I ••• co x . 11 11 I 1 1 .-- ( p ERR y ) • I I I I I I I c UL v ER I I I I I I -- (SHARP ) I l .' I I I I EDGAR. I I I I I.-- (EDWARDSJ , I I I •• FI NL AYSON . I .-- (S EIDEL )(. 11 I, ,FRESE . 1111 I·== (J ARRELL J , I II I .GRIFFIN . I I I I (CRANK), I I I I I 11 HANSON. I I I •• -- (H EAT HER ), •• I I I HART. 111 I I I.-- (M AURER), I I I I I ,HEA THER . I I I.-- (K U ZN I K) I I I I I I I HOL T I I I I I I I .-- (CRANK) I I I I I I. I HUTCH I SO N. I·== (ODL UM), ,, I I I I .KAWANAMI. I I I (VAN DER STAAY), .LASZLO •• 11 I.-- (BR I CKEN) I I •• I I L UX EM BO URGER -- (FI NL E y) I I I I I I I M AND I c I I I I I I -- (ROWAN), I I I I I I .MU LLEN . I I I I.-- (H!CKS)l ''' ''''NELSON,,,,,,== <w 1EDER J ,,, ,, , .NESTANDE.,,, (M AC ALLISTER). PATTINSON .. ,-- (CULVER )l ''' I I .P ERRY. I I I 11 .-- (H EATHER J I I I I I I PLUMMER . I. I.-- (MARSHOTT), ,, I .REL L •• I I II I.-- (STANTON ),''' I .RILEY. I I 111 ·== (W EDEL), I 11111.ROGET.111111 (OVERHOLT),, I I ,ROTH . I I I I I I.-- (EDGAR) I I I I I I I I SA LTA RELL 1 •• -- ( BE y ER ) • I I I I I I I SM I TH I I I I I I I -- ( R ! LEY) I l' I I I I I STANTON . I I I.-- ( ZO MM I c K} I I I I I I s YL v I A. ' • I I • -- (A GR AN). I I I I I I I VARDOU LI S. I.-- (GR EE N), II I l ' I .WAHNER . I I I I.-- (MC ROBERTS J , I .WEDAA. I I II I.-- (ROG ET ), I I. I I I .WEDEL. I I I I I .-- (N ESTANDE), I I I .WIE DER. I I I I.-- (CATLIN),,,, I I .WINTERS , I I I·== STAFF : OTHERS : HARPER. I I I II ./ s YL v Es TER I ' I ./ LEWIS •• I····== CLARKE. I I I I ,_L__ DAWES •• I I II ,_L__ ANDERSON •• I I BUTLER,,,,,, BROWN •• II I ' I / BAKER I I I I I I I ATKINSON,,,, YOU NG. I I I I. I WOODRUFF I I I I HOHENER . I I I. HOWARD I I I I I I HU NT I I I I I I I I KE I TH. I I I I I I KNOPF I I I I I I I LEBLANC .... LINDSTROM I I I LYNC H .. II II I MART I NSON I I .--,,j- PEARCE. I I I I. """-·:__~ _,.;:_ ~-- /Joh c • "a &.,J 1 --- DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 MTG. NOTES 11/17/82 -7:00 P.M. #3 -Receive & file minute excerpt from Brea Chairman Holt recognized new Director Carrey Nelson from Brea. #4 -Report of Engineer Don Martinson from Lowry & Associates was recognized by the Chair. Mr. Martinson passed out Summary reports of the Consolidated Master Plan for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11. He reported that back in 1950 when trunk sewers were constructed there was a great deal of space between cities and now the boundaries area almost touching. Orange County experienced one of the fastest growth rates in 1960's and in 1970's several new major trunk sewers were built. I This study takes a look at entire District 2, 3 & 11 network and considers it as one engineering unit. One continuous sewer system. They used a computer program to calculate figures and find deficiencies in system and came up with routing changes. They rerouted flow to those sewers that have a lot of capacity such as Santa Ana River Interceptor and Knott Interceptor. Referred to map in front of room and reviewed Collection System Capital Improvement Program summaries for each District. Also reviewed capacity exchange agreements. Don Smith asked him to clarify further the Cost of Capacity Exchanges and he indicated that this is a listing of percentage and dollar amounts of each trunk sewer. These exchanges will be made to reach ultimate flow for each District for each trunk sewer. Mandie stated that, basically, what is happening, is that the capacities are being shifted. District 2 is generating more and others reducing their capacities. Correct? Martinson replied, yes. District 2 flow is routed to nearest sewer and it buys capacity from the District that owns that capacity. Bailey asked how capacities will be monitored and if this is built to provide for changes in the future? Don Martinson replied that this could be adjusted in the future, for instance if Districts 2, 3 & 11 join as one District or we could analyze situation every five years. Bailey asked, how do you determine capacities used? Martinson said they are recommending monitoring with meters which will measure on a permanent, year-round basis. Can also monitor industrial wastes as well as flows. Have come out with some very good meters now. Question was asked if projections were for build-out and he answered yes. Don added that all this information is stored in computer. If new development comes in, can put info in computer and recalculate very easily. Can determine what effect development will have on flow all the way to the plant. District 13 and Balsa Chica area are taken into consideration in report. Sylvia asked how Districts 3 and 11 came up with this surplus capacity. Don advised that the Knott Interceptor provides this which was built in the 1970's. Question asked what would happen if you change computer information to combine Districts 3 & 11 or Districts 2 & 5, etc. Don said it doesn't make much sense to break out lines. All of this does operate as one system from an engineering standpoint. Asked if SAWPA has right to buy any more capacity? Answered, they can buy up to 30 MGD and have bought 8 MGD. Asked where those funds would go? FAH answered that they have actually paid their share of the capacity in the Santa Ana River Interceptor. Each time they buy capacity, it is in the treatment plant and all Districts share in the money. Sylvia stated that, basically, this area is one alluvial plane with natural flow. Don replied, yes, is very little pumping except on west side to get it back to the east. District 11 system will be greatly improved when Coast Trunk Sewer goes through. Will have one major pumping station and will eliminate others. Wedaa asked if this entire s y stem is developed, to what y ear will we have capacity? Study is for 5-year increment. Can't really look beyond 1987. Asked if this is based on today's costs and answered yes. No further questions. FAH summarized that the purpose of this meeting was to bring Directors up to date on what the engineers have come up with. Said the staff has pretty well reviewed their report and are very pleased with information. With a trunk sewer system like this, we don't have to build new sewers all at one time. Take care of trouble spots as we see them. With a sewage treatment plant, have to build to take care of additional capacity for many years to come. At this point, Directors could either just discuss this at each District level or refer the report to the Committee on Reorganization and Fiscal Policy Committee. It was so moved, seconded and duly carried: That the draft updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 and 11 be, and is hereby, refe rred to the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Sanitation Districts and to the Fiscal Policy Committee for study and r e commendation. Bailey questioned if all Districts were represented on these Committees and Chairman Holt advised yes and indicated the Committee members' names. Mandie then mentioned that potentially Districts 2, 3 & 11 may consolidate and questioned whether staff is recommending consolidation for Districts 1, 6 & 7 also. Was advised yes, they could potentially consolidate also. Could be four Districts--1,6&7, 2,3&11, 5 and 13&14. Mr. Harper added that the engineer for Districts 1, 6 & 7 would be discussing the advantages of IRWD coming into the Districts. Are some definite advantages. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 2, 3 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING November 17, 1982 -7:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of November 10, 1982, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 2; 3 and 11 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tem reported a quorum present. District 2 DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: District 3 DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: District 11 DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Henry Wedaa, Chairman, Barbara Brown, Don Holt, Carol Kawanami, Carrey Nelson, Bob Perry, Don Smith, Dorothy Wedel Don Roth, Robert Luxembourger, Bruce Nestande, Duane Winters Frank Laszlo, Chairman pro tern, Marvin Adler, Norman Culver, Roland Edwards, Henry Frese, Don Griffin, Robert Mandie, Gerald Mullen, Carrey Nelson, Charles, Rell, Charles Sylvia, Dorothy Wedel Robert Luxembourger, Don Roth, Harriett Wieder, Duane Winters Ruth Bailey, Chairman, Ron Pattinson Harriett Wieder Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, Bill Clarke, Tom Dawes, Rita Brown Don Martinson, Sam Peterson, Mike Swan * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appointing Rita Brown Secretary ·pro tem Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Rita Brown be appointed Secretary ....,,_;· pro tem in the absence of the Secretary. -1- Districts 2, 3 & 11 11/17/82 Districts 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file excerpt re \...)- election of mayor and interim That the minute excerpt from the City of appointment of alternate Director Brea re election of mayor and interim appointment of alternate Director, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and that the following representative be seated as a member of the Board. District Cs) Active Alternate 2 & 3 Carrey J. Nelson Norma A. Hicks Report of Engineer re Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers The Chairman recognized Don Martinson of Lowry and Associates, who reviewed the draft of the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 and 11 prepared by his firm. Mr. Martinson swmnarized the history of the respective Districts' sewer system expansion to keep pace with the rapid development in metropolitan Orange County. The Consolidated Master Plan evaluates the network of the Districts as one system from an engineering viewpoint, without regard to District boundaries. Early in the study it was ascertained that the existing trunk sewer system in . Districts 2, 3 and 11 lends itself very well to the correction of existing and ultimate capacity constraints. The existing major trunk system can be made to carry the existing and projected ultimate flows to the appropriate treatment plant. Existing and proposed diversion structures along with relief sewers can ~ be used to divert flows to major trunks or interceptors that have excess capacity available. Therefore, by optimizing the use of the existing trunk sewer system, the Districts can minimize the cost of providing for the ultimate projected flow. Capacity constraints or deficient sewers were determined-by the use of a computer model which compiled the existing and proposed land uses, calculated the flow for each drainage region, and routed each flow through the appropriate trunk system. By modeling different situations and solutions to the identified deficiencies, the most cost-effective improvements to correct the problems were developed and an estimated time period was developed. The computer model allows the plan to be updated as conditions change. The land use and corresponding wastewater projections reflect an increase in sewage flow of about 23 mgd at build-out over the 1975 Land Use Plan. These changes were mostly in the cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Huntington Beach and Seal Beach, and reflect changes in zoning to accommodate increased density. Despite the significant unused capacity in the lower reaches, many of the upstream reaches have computed flows which are nearing or have exceeded their design capacities. Mr. Martinson then reviewed the recommended phased construction program. District 2 requires three new diversion structures to divert flow to the Santa Ana River Interceptor. District 3 will also require three new diversion structures to divert flow from overloaded sub-trunks to the Knott Interceptor. -2- Districts 2, 3 & 11 11/17/82 District 11 requires four new diversion structures to relieve capacity constraints in the area of McFadden, Heil and Edwards in Huntington Beach. He also reviewed proposed capacity exchanges between Districts in existing facilities that would effectively optimize the use of the existing major interceptor sewer systems. The trunk sewer collection system improvements and capacity exchanges necessary to provide for ultimate build-out of the entire District 2, 3 and 11 service area will cost approximately $52 million in 1982 dollars--$28.S million for District 2, $8.4 million for District 3 and $14.8 million for District 11. In addition to recommended capacity exchanges and construction of relief sewers the engineer recommended a monitoring program to verify computed capacity constraints with actual field measurements, and also to monitor sewage quality for possible harmful industrial discharges. Ref er the draft up(lated and Consolidated Master Plan of Sewers for Districts 2, 3, & to the Special Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee for study and recommendation Trunk 11 Following a lengthy discussion by the Boards, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the draft updated and consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3, & 11, be, and is hereby, referred to the Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the· Sanitation Districts and to the Fiscal Policy Committee for study and recommendation. \.,I District 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: ~ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:40 p.m., November 17, 1982. District 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:40 p.m., November 17, 1982. District 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:40 p.m., November 17, 1982. Secretary pro tem of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District Nos. 2, 3, & 11 of Orange County, California -3-