The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-06-23""·· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 17, 1982 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 5 WEDNESDAYJ JUNE 23~ 1982 -4:30 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL ANNEX 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACHJ CALIFORNIA TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of June 9, 1982, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. JWS:dt II ~· BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Califomia Roll call DISTRICT No. 5 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 1982 -4:30 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALl ANNEX 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD . . . NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA Staff report re propo$ed 1982-83 use~ fees Post Office Box 81-27 10844 Ellis ·Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (1) (2). (.3) (4) Consideration of 1982-83 user fee schedule . ~ y',.N Consideration of motion fixing July~ 1982, 7~p.m., at the Newport Beach City.Council Chambers as the time and place for $ubject hearing on proposed 1982-83 se'Wer service fees (_5} Other business and communications·, .if any 1 6} • • • to adriou--· ·n (·, ~ ~ Cons1derat1on of mot~on ~ • _,, u7 COUNTY SANITAT ION D ISTRICTS of ORA NGE C OUNTY, CALIFO RN IA P. 0 . BOX 8 127 10 8 44 ELLIS A V ENUE FOUNTAIN V A L LEY, CALIFORN I A 9 2708 June 17, 1982 1 (7 14 ) 5 40 -29 10 (714) 962 -2411 STAF F REPORT TO: Distr ict 5 Board o f Di rec tor s SUBJECT: 1982 -83 User Fees .. 1981-82 User Fee s J Last year the f o l lowing us er fee p rogram was proposed to ma k e up the shor tfall of ad val o r em tax revenues and provide needed additiona l f i nancing f o r oper ations and major rehabilitation work on the sewe r system: CONNECTE D 198 1 CHARGE ESTIMATED 1982-'85 CHARGE MET ER SI ZE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL .FEE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL FEE l" or less $ 2.20 $ 26 .4 0 $ 3 .90 $ 46 .80 l lr2" 4.37 52 .5 0 8 .02 96.25 2" 8.75 105.00 16.04 192.50 3" 17 .50 21 0.00 32.08 385 .00 4" 35 .00 420 .00 64 .16 770 . 00 6" ... 70 .00 840.00 1 28.33 1,540.00 8 " 140.00 1,680 .00 256.66 3,080.00 All property owners in the District were notified of the proposed fee and after a series of publ ic workshops and hear ings the Board adopted t he above 1 981 rates for f i scal y e ar 1 981-82. L • "I Multiple Uni t Properties Because of the short time frame for implementing the financial plan it was not possibl e to identify a ll the multiple un it p r operties within t he District . The Boa r d directed t he staff to develop a n equitabl e fee str uctur e for multi ple un i ts to be considered for adoption in 1982-83. We have analy zed the p r operties within the District with more than one unit and find that there are 4,243 parcels contai ning a t o t al of 13,392 multiple units as summari z ed on the a t tached Exhibit "A". Based on existing stud i es, a generally accepted average sewage dis c harge from multipl e dwelling units is appr o x imately 60% of a detached single family residence. Applying this to the curren t rate of $26 .40, the multiple dwelli n g rate would be $15.85 . l L ' IC --~ ,-\ . Staff Report Page Two June 17, 1982 1982-83 Recommended User Fees I l .. We recommend the same 1981-82 single user rate of $26.40 for 1982-83 and adoption of a multi -unit rate at 60% ($15.85) of the single rate. At the moment, the District is in a better financial position than expected at this time last year. This is because of extremely favorable bids on construction contracts awarded during 1981-82, a delay in completion of the new advanced treatment plant facilities and the resulting avoidance of increased operating costs, higher than expected interest earnings on reserves, and purchase of additional capacity by SAWPA. Staff has prepared a preliminary projection of the District's 1982-83 cash flow (see Exhibit "B"). Based upon these estimates it appears as if the District could forego the projected doubling of the user fee for 1982-83 that was anticipated when the plan was developed last year. • ·-.. ....... CONNECTED METER SIZE l" or ll,-2 It 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" PER UNIT PROPOSED 1982-83 RATES SINGLE UNIT PARCELS (Same Fee as 81-82) 1982-83 CHARGE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL FEE less $ 2 .20 $ 26.40 4.37 52.50 8 .75 105.00 17.50 210.00 35 .00 420.00 70 .00 840.00 140 .00 1,680.00 MULTI-UNIT PARCELS (New Fee) $ 1. 32 $ 15.85 t i ' • • ~ i_ I Although the new multi-unit rate may result in a substantial fee increase for properties with a large number of dwellings , over 93% (land with less than four units) would pay less than was originally expected for a single unit parcel in 1982-83 ($46.80) when the program was approved last July . ..... I ' I 1 • • • -- r -- 1 EXHIBIT "A" SUMMARY OF MULTIPLE UNIT (Excludes Hotels) . . NO. OF UNITS TOTAL NO. OF PER PARCEL PARCELS TOTAL NO. OF 2 3,662 7,324 3 289 867 4 88 352 5 34 170 rr 6 24 .. -144 • 7 12 84 8 17 136 9 3 , 27 10 7 70 11 or more 107 4,218 Total 4,243 13,392 Other Properties Estimated Net Additional User Fee Income .... .. I L. PARCELS UNITS .. - 1. 6 /17/82 I I ESTIMATED ANNUAL USER FEE INCOME , • ... $212,263 588,948 $721,211 I p .. rl' ----..... A LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 EXHIBIT "B" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEAR 1982-83 B DESCRIPTION OPERATING FUND Reserves & Carry-Over From Last Year REVENUE Share of 1% Tax Allocation ; 10% Fees Interest & Miscellaneous Income Other Revenue TOTAL REVENUE TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING EXPENDITURES Share of Joint Works M & o Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements Fund Balance or (Deficit) CAPITAL FUND(S) Reserves & Carry-Over from Last Year REVENUE Construction Grants Fees: Connection Other Sale of Capacity Rights Interest & Miscellaneous Income Other Income TOTAL REVENUE TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING EXPENDITURES Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant District Collection System Reimbursement Agreement Payments Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements Fund Balance or (Deficit) I I ' I • t J I 1 \ l I , . ... 6/13/82 c AMOUNT 981,000 1,035,000 358,000 126,000 1,519,000 2,500,000 906,000 530,000 1,436,000 1,064,000 920,000 144,000 6,528,000 510,000 338,000 363,000 15,000 625,000 1,851,000 8,379 ,000 2,710,000 1,325,000 529,000 4,564,000 3,815,000 2,362 ,000 1, 453, 000 -=----- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 CALENDAR FOR 1982-83 USER FEE ORDINANCE ADOPTION June 23 -Board consideration of staff recommendation -1982-83 rates same as 1981-82 6-23-82 -Multiple dwelling charge 60% of single dwelling charge -Fix public hearing for July)!{, 1982@ 7:30 p.m., Newport Beach City Council Chambers 1k ~ ~tP' June 28 -Mail notice of proposed rates and workshop/hearing to approximately 300 affected property owners of four or more units July 9 -Publish notice of proposed rates and workshop/hearing in local newspapers July 12 -Public Workshop, Newport Police Department Auditorium July 14 -First reading of ordinance at regular Joint.Board Meeting July~ -Public Bearing and consideration of .adoption of ordinance at adjourned ~) board meeting, Newport Beach City Council Chambers August 10 -Provide parcel charge tape to County Auditor Property at COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 NOTICE OP PUBLIC WORKSHOP Monday, July 12, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. Newport Beach Police Department Auditorium 870 Santa Barbara Drive Newport Beach 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 DISTRICT NO. S PROPOSED 1982-83 SEWER SERVICE PEES MAILED TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITH MORE THAN 3 UNITS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S is proposing to adopt the same single unit annual sewer service fee schedule ($26.40) for 1982-83 that was in effect for 1981-82 (see schedule on back of this page), thus delaying the increase that was anticipated when sewer use fees were implemented last year. However, the Board proposes to adopt a $15.85 per unit annual fee for all properties with multiple dwelling units, calculated at 60% o; the single rate of $26.40 per year. Because your property has been identified as having multiple units and will be affected by the new fee you are being notified that-the proposed multi-unit parcel fee will be assessed against the number of units indicated on the above label. You may calculate your estimated 1982-83 sewer service fee by multiplying the number of units by $1S.85~ Por example: No. of Units Annual Onit Pee Total l $ 26.40 $ ~6.40 2 15.85 31.70 3 15.85 47.55 4 15.85 63.40 s 15.85 79.25 10 15.85 lS8.SO so 15.85 792.SO The fees will be collected on the 1982-83 property tax bill. A Public Workshop to explain the fees and answer your questions has been scheduled for July 12, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. at the Newport Beach Police Department Auditorium, 870 Santa Barbara Drive, Newport Beach. The Board of Directors will then conduct a public hearing on July 28, 1982 at 8:00 p.m. at the Newport Beach City Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. '-11 If you have more questions or if our information on your property is incorrect please call the Districts' office at (714) 540-2910, Extension s. 6/30/82 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 CONNECTED MET.BR SIZE i• or lJs• 2• 3• 4• &• a• PER UNIT PBOPOSED 1982-83 RATES SINGLE UNIT PARCELS (Same Fee as 81-82) 1982-83 CHARGE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL FEE less $ 2.20 4.37 8.75 17.50 35.00 70.00 140.00 MOLTI-tJRIT PARCELS (New Fee) MON'l'BiiY AVERAGE $ 1.32 $ 26.40 52.50 105.00 210.00 420.00 840.00 l,680.00 ANNUAL FEE $ 15.85 MEETING DATE __ J _un_e _2 _3 _,_1_9_8_2 __ TI ME 4:30 p .m. DI STRICTS 5 -Newport Beach City Hall DISTRICT 1 JOIN T BOARDS (CRANK). l •••• I. HANSON ,. I •• I (BRICKENJ ,. I ••• LUXEM&OURGER -- ( EDGAR), , , , , , , , SAL TA RELL I , , -- (RI LEY) •• I ••••• STANTON . I I.·== DI STR !CT 2 (MC ROBERTS),,,WEDAA,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,ROTH ,,,,,,,,-- (N I ELSEN),,,,,, BROWN,,,,,,.-- (G AMBIN(d, ••••• FOX •• I •••••• -- (KUZ NI K),,,,,,, HOLT ,,,,,,,.-- (OD LUM ), l ,,,,,, KAWA NAM I,,,.-- ~BR I CKEt.U ,,,,,, LUXEMBOURGER== WIEDER),,,,,, ,NESTANDE ., ,, CULVER) , , , , , , , PERRY , , , , , , , -- (B EYER).,,,,,, ,SMITH ,,,,,,.-- (HO LM BERG),,,, ,WEDE L .''. I'.-- (ACKERMAN),,, ,,WINTERS ,,,,,=:::: DISTRICT 3 (ED WARDS)''' l ' I F I NLA YSON I., __ (VA NDERSTAAYJ , .LASZLO.,,,,, (N IEL S~N),, ,,,,ADLER ,,,,,,,-- (PERRY)t ' '.'.I .CU L VER.''''·= (SEIOELJ , '''''.FRESE .' •• ' I I ( F 0 x ) • ' • I I • I ' I ' GAM BI NA ' ' ' ' • -- (JARRELL) •• '' I' GR I FFIN ••• '.-- (BRICKENL ' ''I ,LUXEMBOURGER-- (F INLEY),' I''' .MANDIC .' I''.-- (ROWA N) I' l ' ''I .MU LLE N.'' I'·== (MARSHOTTJ , '' •• RELL ••••••• I (WEDEL). l' I •••• ROGET ••• ' ••• -- ( ) •••• I I RO TH •• I I . I I.-- ( ZOMM I CK) l . I • I I SY L v I A I •••• ·== (NESTANDEJ , •••• WIE DER .'''' I (ACKERMA N),,, ,,WINTERS ,,,··= DISTRICT 5 (MAURER)l ''''''HEATHER,,,,, V (STRAUSSJ , ••• I .cox ... ' I ••• I (,,./ (STANTON) •• '' •• RILEY. I •••• ,7._ DISTRIC T 6 (CR ANK). l ' I.' •• HUTC H! SO N,.·-- ( HEA T H~R J ,, •••• PLUMMER . I''. (RI LEY ),, I I,, •• STANTON •• ''·== DISTRICT 7 (SALT ARELLI),,,EDGAR . ,, ''I' (B E y ER) • l ' ' I ' ' ' SM I TH I ' ' • ' I ' -- (H EATH ER J ,' I'' I HART . I'''''.--(BR IC KE~)., I'' ,LUXEMBOURGER= (WIEDER),' I I' •• NESTANDE , I I I (SILLS ). I ' I I I I. VARDOULIS ••• -- (GREEN), I'' I ••• WAHNER.'' I'·== DISTRICT 11 (MAC ALLISTER ). BAILEY . I',,' (NESTA NDE )' I' l 'WI EDER ••• I •• -- (MAC ALLIS TERJ .PATTINSON , I ·== 6/9/82 I_,( (N I ELSEN ) •••• l . ADLER •• I ••• , __ (MAC ALLJS TERJ .BAILEY . I •••• (NIELSEN), 11 ••• BROWN ••••••• -- (STRAUSS), ••• , ,cox . I •••• I •• -- (PERRY),.'' I ••• CULVER . I I ,,.-- (SHAR P )' l .' I' I' EDGAR .'' I' •• -- (EDWARDS J,,,,, .FINLAYSON ,,.-- (G AMBI NA),''' I .FOX . I I.' I I'.-- (S EIDEL) •• I' I •• FRESE .''.''.-- ( F 0 x) I I • l I I • I ' • GAM BIN A' I ' • '== (JARR E~L J ,,' I I .GR IF FIN . I II I (CRA NK ) I l I I I I I I HANSON , I I I.·== ~HEATHERJ , I I' I .HART , I. I. I I I MAURER),,,' I •• HEA THER,, II.-- KUZNI K) I I. I I I.HOLT I I I I. I'.-- (CR ANK),,,,,, ,,HUTCHISON ,,.-- (O DL UM), '''' l ' 'KAWANAM I' I •• -- (VA NDERSTAAY J , ,LASZLO.,, I ,, (BRI CKEN ), I'', ,LUXEMBOURGER-- (F I NL EY),,,,,, ,MAND I C,,,,, ,-- (RO WAN), Ill'' •• MULLEN .'' I I.-- (W I EDER),,,,, t , NESTANDE .,, ·== (MAC AL ~I S T ERJ ,PATT I NSON ,,, (CU LVER),,,,, ,,PERRY ,,,,,,.-- ( HEA THE R ) l , , , , , PL UM M ER , , , , , == (MA RSH OTT J ,,, ,,RELL,,,,,,,, (STANTON), I''. I RIL EY.' I.' •• -- (WEDEL). l ' I '''' ROG ET.' ••••• -- ( J,,.,,.RQTH ,,,,,,,, (EDGAR) ••• I •••• SALTARELLI •• -- (BEYE R),,,,,,, ,SM IT H,,,,,,.-- (R I LEY). l' I •••• STAN TON •• ''.-- ( ZOM M ICKJ, ,,, ,,SY LVIA,,,,,, (S I LLS),,,,,, ,,VARDOULIS ,, .-- (GREEN),,,' l ', ,WAHNER ,,,,,·== (MC ROBERTSJ , ,,WEDAA,,,, ,, , (ROGET),, l',,,, WED EL ,,,,,,·= (NE STAN DEJ ,,, ,,W IEDER,,,,,, (ACKERMA N),,,,, WIN TERS ,,,,.=:::: OTHERS HARPER ,,,,,, v SYLVESTER ,, ,"l:T"° LEW I S ,,,,,,, __ CLARKE .'' I I·~ DAWES ,,,,,,, __ AND ERSON .'. I BROWN " " , " BAKER I ' ' ' ' ' I ATKINSON ,,,, YOUNG .''''' I WOODRUF F ' ' ' I HOHENER .' I'. HO WA RD . I' I I' HU NT'' •• I •• ' KE I TH . I' I' I' LYNCH . I' I ' I ' MARTINSON ,,, S TE VE NS . I'. I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOUBNED REGULAR MEETING June 23, 1982 -4:30 p.m. Newport Beach City Hall Annex 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of June 9, 1982, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meetig at the above hour and date, at the Newport Beach City Ball Annex • The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRFSENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Jacqueline Heather (Chairman), Thomas Riley John Cox Fred A. Harper, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Tom Dawes None * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Staff report re proposed 1982-83 user fees The staff reviewed the following user.fee program that was approved last year to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for operations and major rehabilitation work on the District's sewer system: CONNECTED 1981 CHARGE ESTIMATED 1982-'85 CHARGE METER SIZE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL FEE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL FEE l" or less $ 2.20 $ 26.40 $ 3.90 $ 46.80 l~" 4.37 52.50 8.02 96.25 2" 8.75 105.00 16.04 192.50 3n 17.50 210.00 32.08 385.00 4n 35.00 420.00 64.16 770.00 6" 70.00 840.00 128.33 1,540.00 8" 140.00 1,680.00 256.66 3,080.00 All property owners in the District were notified of the proposed fees and after a series of public workshops and hearings the Board adopted the above 1981 rates for fiscal year 1981-82. Because of the short time frame for implementing the financial plan it was not possible to identify all the multiple unit properties within the District. The Board directed the staff to develop an equitable fee structure for multiple units to be considered for adoption in 1982-83. District 5 6/23/82 Based on an analysis of the multiple dwelling properties and the Districts' current financial position1 the staff reported they were able to recommend the same 1981-82 single user rate of $26.40 for 1982-83 and adoption of a multi-unit rate at 60% ($15.85) of the single rate, thus delaying the increase that was anticipated when sewer use fees were implemented last year. This is because of extremely favorable bids on construction contracts awarded during 1981-82, a delay in completion of the new advanced treatment plant facilities and the resulting avoidance of increased operating costs, higher than expected interest earnings on reserves, and purchase of additional capacity by SAWPA. It was noted that although the new multi-unit rate may result in a substantial fee increase for properties with a large number of dwellings, over 93% (land with less than four units) would pay about the same or less than was originally expected for a single unit parcel in 1982-83 ($46.80) when the program was approved last July. Declaring intent re proposed 1982-83 sewer use fees seconded and duly carried: Following a· general discussion of the proposed sewer use fees for 1982-83 and the tentative calendar for impl~mentation, it was moved, That the Board of Directors does hereby declare its intent to adopt the following proposed sewer use fees for 1982-83: V · CONNECTED METER SIZE l" or less l~" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" PER UNIT SINGLE UNIT PARCELS (Same Fee as 81-82) 1982-83 CHARGE MONTHLY AVERAGE ANNUAL FEE $ 2.20 4.37 8.75 17.50 35.00 70.00 140.00 MULTI-UNIT PARCELS (New Fee) $ 1.32 $ 26.40 52.50 105.00 210.00 420.00 840.00 1,680.00 $ 15.85 FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to proceed in accordance with the calendar for 1982-83 User Fee Ordinance Adoption. -2- District 5 6/23/82 Fixing hearing on Ordinance No. 513 re 1982-83 sewer use fees Moved, seconded and duly carried: That July 28, 1982, at 8:00 p.m. at the Newport Beach City Hall, be, and is hereby, fixed as the time and place for public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 513, an ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, amending Ordinance No. 511 and establishing sanitary sewer service charges for 1982-83. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:05 p.m., June 23, 1982. Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 Orange County, California Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation Distrct No. 5 of Orange County, California -3-