The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-03-24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (F.z 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 1❑B44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEG❑ FREEWAY) March 18 , 1982 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO, 3 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 1982 6 :00 P.M. 10844 ELLIs AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of March 10 , 1982, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 will meet in an adjourned meeting at the above hour and date. Secretary JWS: rb �/ ' BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: 14 DISTRICT No. 3 A4 Code 10 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 1982 - 6:00 P.M. (1) Roll call (2) Staff report on status of updating and consolidating the Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 being prepared by Lowry and Associates (3) Consideration of Districts 3 and 11 inter-district trunk sewer capacities (4) Other business and communications, if any (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn 3/16/82 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 B C D E BUDGET EST'D ACTUAL OVER(UNDER) LINE DESCRIPTION 1981-82 1981-82 BUDGET 1 OPERATING FUND Reserves & Carry-Over From Last Year 7,326,000 7,326,000 -0- REVENUE 2 Share of 1% Tax Allocation @ 12% 5,575,000 5,480,000 (95,000) 3 Fees 300,000 345,000 45,000 4 4- Interest & Miscellaneous Income 970,000 1,619,000 > 649,000 5 Other Revenue 6 TOTAL REVENUE 6,845,000 7,444,000 599,000 7 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 14,171,000 14,770,000 599,000 EXPENDITURES 8 Share of Joint Works M & 0 4,382,000 3,300,000 > (1,082,000) 9 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 612,000 487,000 (125,000) 10 Other Expenditures 11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,994,000 3,787,000 (1,2071000) 12 Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year 9,177,000 10,983,000 1,806,000 13 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 2,497,000 2,497,000 14 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 6,680,000 8,486,000 1,806,000 `.� CAPITAL FUND(S) 15 Reserves & Carry-Over from Last Year 26,925,000 26,925,000 -0- REVENUE 16 Construction Grants 6,184,000 6,092,000 (92,000) 17 Fees: Connection 500,000 360,000 (140,000) 18 Other 315,000 355,000 40,000 19 Sale of Capacity Rights 33,000 33,000 20 < Interest & Miscellaneous Income 3,230,000 4,568,000 > 1,338,000 21 Other Income 255,000 255,000 22 TOTAL REVENUE 10,517,000 11,663,000 1,146,000 23 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 37,442,000 38,588,000 1,146,000 EXPENDITURES 24 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 16,552,000 8,100,000 > (8,452,000) 25 District Collection System 555,000 128,000 (427,000) 26 Reimbursement Agreement Payments 27 Other Expenditures 85,000 85,000 28 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,192,000 8,313,000 (8,879,000) 29 Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Year 20,250,000 30,275,000 10,025,000 30 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 31 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 20,250,000 30,275,000 10,025,000 7/10/81 7/23/81 Revised COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLbW FISCAL YEARS 1981-82 THRGUGH 1985-86 , 8 C D E F G H DESCRIPTION 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1 89 4-85 1985-86 5-Year Total OPERATING FUND I Reserves S Carry-Over From Last Year 7,326,000 9,177.000 10.412.000 10,941.000 11,067,000 7.326.000 REVENUE 2 Share of 13 Tax Allocation 2 12% 5,575,000 6,411,000 7,092,000 7.943,000 8,896.000 35,917,000 3 Fees 300.000 345,000 396,000 455.000 523,000 2,019,000 4 Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income 970.000 1,235,000 1.402,000 1,482,000 1.519,000 6,608,000 5 Other Revenue 6 TOTAL REVENUE 6,845,000 7,991.000 8,890,000 9.880.000 10,938,000 44,544,000 7 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 14,171,000 17,168,000 19,302,000 20,821,000 22,005,000 51,870,000 EXPENDITURES 8 Share of Joint Works M 6 0 4,382,000 6,110,000 7,618,000 8,900,000 10,614,000 37,624.000 9 Collection System M 6 0 and Other Oper. 612,000 646,000 743.000 854,000 982,000 3,837.000 10 Other Expenditures 11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,994,000 6,756.000 8,36i,00o 9,754,000 11,596,000 41,461,000 12 Reserves b Carry-Over to Next Year 9,177,000 10,412,000 lo,941,000 11,067,000 10.409,000 10,409,000 13 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 2,497,000 3,378,000 4,181,o00 4,877,000 5,798,000 5,798,000 14 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 6,68o,00o 7,034,000 6,760,000 6,190,000 4,611.000 4,611,000 CAPITAL FUND(S) 15 Reserves b Carry-Over from Last Year 26,925,000 20,250,000 23,040,000 20,641,000 19,766,000 26.925,000 REVENUE 16 Construction Grants 6,184,000 4,051,000 3,709,000 3,562,000 2,928,000 20,434,000 17 Fees: Connection 500,000 500,000 500,000 500.000 500.000 2,500,000 18 Other 315,000 362,000 416,000 478.000 550.000 2,121,000 19 Sale of Capacity Rights 33,000 2,328,000 128,000 2,648,000 173,000 5,310,000 20 Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income 3,230,000 2,430,000 2,764,0oo 2,476,000 2,371,000 13.271.000 21 Other Income 255,000 255,000 22 TOTAL REVENUE 10,517.000 9,671,000 7,517,000 9.664,000 6,522,000 43,891,000 23 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 37.442.000 29,921.000 30,557,000 30,305.000 26,288,0oo 70.8i6.000 EXPENDITURES Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 16,552,000 4,182,000 9,741,000 9,219,000 6,209,000 45,903.000 District Collection System 555.000 2,699,000 175,000 1.320,000 1,420,000 6,169,000 26 Reimbursement Agreement Payments 27 Other Expenditures 85.000 85,000 28 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,192,000 6,881,000 9,916,000 10,539,000 7,629,000 52,157,000 29 Reserves a Carry-Over to Next Year 20,250,000 23,040,006 20.641,000 19.766,000 18,659.000 18.659,000 30 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 31 Fund Balance or (Deficit) ?J2 nnn �3,n40,noo ?�64t nnn 19 G IID� 18�S.q�II� l��;g nnn BOND FUNDS) 32 Reserves 6 Carry-Over From Last Year 538,000 413,000 400,000 387,000 375,000 538,000 REVENUE 33 Tax Levy 490,000 592,000 573,000 555,000 535,000 2,745,OGO 3a Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income 42,000 32,000 31,000 30,000 29,000 164.000 35 Other Income 36 TOTAL REVENUE 532,000 624,000 604,000 585,000 564,000 2,909,000 37 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1,070,000 1.037,000 1,004,000 972,000 939,000 '3,447,000 EXPENDITURES 33 Bond Principal s Interest 657,000 637,000 617,000 597,000 577,000 3,085,0oo 35 Other Expenditures 40 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 657,000 637,000 617,000 597,000 577,000 3,085,000 41 Reserves b Carry-Over to Next Year. 413.000 400,000 387,000 375,000 362,000 362,000 42 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 413,000 400,000 387,000 375,000 362,000 362.000 43 Fund Balance or (Deficit) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- SUM%RY(Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers) 44 Reserves C Carry-Over From Last Year 34.789.000 29,840,000 33,852,000 31,969,000 31,208,000 34,789,00o 45 TOTAL REVENUE 17,894,Oo0 18,286,000 17.011,000 20,129,000 18,024,000 91,344,000 .6 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 52,683,000 48,126,000 50,863,000 52,o98,000 49,232,000 126.133,000 .7 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22.843,000 14,274,000 18,894,000 20.890,000 19,802,D00 96.703,000 »3 Reserves t Carry-Over to Next Year 29,840,000 33,852.000 31,969,000 37208,000 29,430,obo 29,430,000 jn Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 2,910,000 3.778.000 4,568,OOo 5,252,000 6,160,000 6,160,o00 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) 26,930.000 30,074,000 27,401,000 25,956,000 23.270,000 23,270,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 3 7/10/81 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 FISCAL YEAR FUND +3 OPERATING APPROVED I APPROVED ESTIMACTUAALTED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPEPID.ITURES BUDGET 1981-82 1979-80 1980-81 1980-81 OPERATING Fees 3, 0 3 Directors' r>< • .: tiu:y„ ?•iti�i tiif v Contractual Services ::y_:,. ::,s><'€. %:':..i.z�a ::z> 2,636,935 2 892,127 ? 1'? e ? >•;}4:,}>:.,•:.,:}:}},: 4,382,000 Share of Joint Operating <{c :: >.;:;f •. 100,000 Trunk Maintenance 100, 9 :> < `"r: 000 100 000 150, ;.1:k13 '>' 50,000 Manhole Repairs %: Maintenance 45,000 75,000 :; 3 .Y... i;;: >; Pump Station >�: := Waste Adm. 65,000 65,000 r::a rpll:;; 75,000 5, 000 Permit b Ind. ast gg p n Fee Adm. 50,000 50,000 :azi�}:;sfy}s -e •c, ,�8 :r.: 4i:vry':'J,.j::£'i `SAY` }'%::Y'•:};i'.�� :i{,�? 3,000 Inter-Dist. Sewer Use Chg. 700 700 {r' •x ; .' :: "• .,4:.,r-`:-:::' ,;-3R>ian:: !:<-x,•:f>':fo:>. ••>y: :}.>..fKt,-:..t} 1,000 :;.a;;%;:'; -a>:v}'•. .i:ic:•fi:: t:ff : Bond Collection Expense 1,300 1,30015,000 Tax Collection Expense 12,000 15,000 :;y;^cr;> :; „`<>:: •;;: ,{: ;'" :: v: �r�f�i�:'.Y,.3:`V'i'.,'``{'.i?�r:Zt%.�ic•:``y��?fi%!>~•yrGL: :.:}':;t;7':3£+•2 Treasurer's Investment y,•�; ? <" £}.; :#%} ::tr• ':' :! •:. 22,000 Adm. b Banking Fees 000 %o.. ,: 88,000 ,000 , 109 000 % Utilities 20,000 20,000 Professional Services 20 000 rShN'"^i ' s •:'.,, � ,' SIR, 11 500 1,50U .r'<7>3}��''''� Y''3`i??:<..>.� •.�`wu; 5j ' Printing and Publication 1,500 Y,.f,;:r ^},.•;: :: Travel s Mt - Directors 1,500 I,500 '• ^�`}.4"�;� >:.:.:>;}:�;<;;;:t: <;>.;;:»•�': 1,500 Uncollectable Accounts 10,000 10,000 y; .,;}: :,.�`�.:, <}:h;?:: , 000 >ii••:Y.:v.�f:.:'{::. 'L?- :%�•Sff''if)'4S+K,<. TOTAL OPERATING 7 +' 3 156 935 3 512 12 '�' �' "w7.:F: �� `• 4,989,000 f , , , :� s, �SA�:}?�•�Ci3�>�?yt{r,:•}?v NON-OPERATING Expenses Applicable to :••..:�'•>};�;•... 000 ,000 ?xSiI£ `}s: cif:{ ,.,,;: ''•«�z.' 5,000 Prior Years 3, 3 .3 d : •� ''• •^?•` TOTAL NON-OPERATING 3,000 3,000 `% .`t �€i$t x. s , f Y; f 5,000 TOTAL OPERATING E NON-OPERATING 3,159,935 3,515,127 : ;. 4,994,000 RESERVES <'n%>>:vsj=ids ::: z`.•>:;}5:=t< }s ,: ;;,' .�;.} ''=•>??i}}'}i.}•v.:::'.f:.T.$Y ';y#::>:{.n.w:�•: :;%:::".. ,r,...�ti,::•.)f�'.;-`.:::;:.:fit`.. Appropriation for Contin- gencies 4 I �:'�`:`:> 6,680,003 2,071,627 80 9 7 7, �`?v�2if???^f:C:f::•:;':>i: r' General Reserve 1 5 000 1,758,000 "'''"""`�''' "' "' ""`' '"""""' Authorized Gen a 79. y `{•:;;�;>�?:::i;<.:{;;x<; v:t?:<;:;:;_;.;<::::}:}:}:<� 2,497,000 "hiry fY:}lti:.:.t.:.:fy:'•Yec�f? u:{iy'S+:f'>::i%:�L.\.''i TOTAL RESERVES 3,650,627 6,565,917 '" `' 'y"' 9,177,003 SUB-TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,810,562 i O,081,044 ::;w=.v;:;;;.:}!>:;;3::;;;:;.::: ' '>z <i: .;;>:<:;;-..>: 14,171,003 TRANSFER SELF-INSURANCE RESERVES "}^•"��'•'•••'•:;:: «,, .�. ; :�. _, , ;;: TO SEPARATE FUNDS 205,777 14,171,003TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 7,016,339 10,081,044 4 FUN nOPERATI N is��l�?ll<.:'f{`'1� #?`'`. •.Q>`'zB�E'��}�':€.•.... I � COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 7/10/81 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 FISCAL YEAR \� FUND #3 OPERATING APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPEND.ITURES 1 BUDGET UDGET 1979-86 1980-81 1980-81 AVAILABLE FUNDING ;;.;yy� Cash & Investments {Appropriated Reserves ` f' s�i Z: 7, l,854,36b 4,368,393 }'Y' ,. 326 003 and Carry-Over) s ' ' ' 000 ` ?`^; i;-• } {s;<rR 120,000 17,000 90, Delinquent Taxes '< '` °'' rmk E,^ ''s."'``'•:\>. a. OO 000 Fees 475.000 400,000 850000 Interest b Misc. Receipts 125,000 00, }. a ' ,�\:' ' 000 429 954 663,209 :h;:le'i.. . : •':;>w:% 736, Subventions :•H v4 r ..ice-� ,��: `<��:''-• mrg 4'839'000 Tax Allocation 4,115,019 4,359,442 44 14,171,003 ,��': f•Y TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 7,016,339 10,081,044 Pz � . 's:>„• . ''4?�;s; r. :cam• :r`k•: ��: • ^•.it.wY".y4. _iSEta'•::>.}x.i`i'?y.4 v,:;:�4y'` Y13'"'4�+<:'.+C::ty}};: ''i:�•Y�J.:"' ->- <9•:•,{per'.i.'.i.<;.. u.''}��`,vs 3ao:?"%�:�.r:'':.:Y:i.:� w<4� ;,`�'.,�;i?f�`.^y'Y.•�?'iS, • is::?,...,..M�S t'•{iyi�'T:•�•ii}h.:. fx•3.� ..,k.$<.: �:y�2�..�L, v.{'�:•.+i.•iJ} .4¢i"t{Y�-44:`v J. 'ia<dir.'• Ky..'2iJ%y:::y'o`:`•3 o},O),t'?Y Z�t;};4,-`��.>' ; •x-:.i::��.7::s:9yFG<#:�;}'`,'.�..'•`�? x�«x~'�.`•:i5',K?i°'? },o:::�Ji:i'f:+?i Y:y r,,.x :;;.•4 rr.�{r'�-��y..G�,::'rn,: fix:,. •:'t'' w.c} ;�:} :«�;..,, t{}.. i ::of'a�%�liYy'1.2,'.,� sx•'�`,%;i;)s ..i.r•'�•,#.;;�''jy:g:S':<e.::4��;a'�< •�}i,�k2+�i:;i�-��Pkir�#��,;1',� '<M:�3;�.�`�• iy2;}}T,+C` ^'•.;'i:;,i:'::++c?;n;.yy:;�4.':'r:;hx3:y�2;,}.A>•Y:.axy`>'� ;:+': �•):.;L+Fir NC�ti V {J.j�:• ::I; K}:'•:;`>:J:4::ti?L<•Yxi�;i'::} ` Si-�:_�.:•,r$�,:'e'l h.-i}:4x•:i<Y-}*,iY-.TC,i ijf�i .i:y;i:�� ' '':}nJ�:Q';FQ:,:�!!•.v:<tC�:C<:::7 i<Ji'\;.,.u.;:}.i;t. {J;:ji.',,<<.};<+:Y: ;}<:<•W i;�G::r::.::t:?.}};:vin{:u;,>.:{:{tij�;:;:`jj�?;�: SCi R:k•:v in\i;; S:S S: '::}iY :jiL,:i: i}YYL:• Ji{ :vG COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 3 j7/to/81 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 FISCAL YEAR FUND #3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY APPROVED I APPROVED I ESTIMATEDACTUAL RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1979-86 1980-81 1980-81 1981-82 PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Treatment Plant Expansion 18,495,000 21,568,000 :w $ ' �# 18,389,000 Appropriation for Non-Grant " > Funded Treatment Plant "" = "'2� y"• ''" Facilities 2,406,000 2,228,000 11,550,529 � •r ICR Payment to Federal Gov't. 53,000 106,000 ± r � Reimburse Other CSD's for Seal Beach Blvd. Pump } Station Equity 85,400 85,400 f 85,400 Radio Linked Telemetry System 51,000 a ' 4o,000 Westminster Ave. Force Main (Unit 2) 325,000 Master Plan Update 25,000 60,000 Y x 60,000 Flow Analysis 55,000 •55,000 Appropriation for District Facilities Improvements E Extensions 100,000 451,288 f500,000 lq� Capital Replacement Reserves 4,268,714 4,198,399 ,TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 25,758,114 28,803,087 30,679,929 rw AVAILABLE FUNDING , ,r •%•�.� a:a}; Cash & Investments (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-Over) 15,858,725 17,396,087 21,332,929 Delinquent Taxes 70,000 ` Joint Works Equity Sale 598,389 850,000 :`2 ' 255,000 Federal and State Grants 7,711,000 9,132,000 ' 6,184,000 s oa •r ' Fees " 450,000 390,000 � �"' `a� 315,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 70,000 35,000 rs 33,000 Interest E Misc. Receipts 1,000,000 1,000,000 '� 2,560,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 25,758,114 28,803,087 :' 30,679,929 AWh �•' � v �'q. •fir' � �:.,. f)��'. '},"�`,�.�.{:.•�:.. J':�"•'}� :.,vex,' ':'K: �}.,.`„�'�� C: �.`,`�•^ ice'` ``, Z .: ,4:'•;; it ` ..� t'Yk: :. »�Y:.. .�R c,,{oy<,•3.`�,%i�::ty?k,,ay`,�'i� �?S:'%r .,�1�.'{,• S+'L' ,:t3$ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0, 3 7„0/31 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1981-82 FISCAL YEAR �r FUND =3 FACILITIES REVOLVING APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATEDACTUAL RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1979-80 1980-81 1980-31 1981-32 PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Knott Interceptor, Reach 8 1 ,100,000 Orangethorpe Relief Trunk, Reaches 16 & 16A 2,500,000 2,000,000 2,212,3+=7 Seal Beach Blvd. Pump Station 300,000 500,000 381,033 150,000 Katella Relief Interceptor 1,200,000 1,220,000 Crescent Relief Interceptor 1,000,000 i ,012,000 Magnolia Interceptor, Reach 30 1,200,000 1 ,120,000 Lampson Interceptor, Reaches 11 and 12 1,500,000 1,512,000 Appropriation for District Facilities Improvements and Extensions 1,563,000 54,449 1 ,748,164 Capital Replacement Reserves 2.526,614 -0- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 7,989,614 7,454,449 2,593. 81 6,762,164 AVAILABLE FUNDING Cash E Investments (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-Over) 6,589,614 6,554,449 5,592,164 Connection Fees 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 Interest Income 400,000 400,000 670,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 7,989,614 7,454,449 6,762,164 r I 7/10/81 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS Project Total 1981 -82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 Master Plan Update 60,000 60,000 Flow Analysis 55,000 55,000 Radio Linked Telemetry System 40,000 40,000 Miscellaneous Projects 500,000 T00,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Sub-Total ACO Fund 655,000 255,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Ste, Beach Pump Station 150,000 150,000 Katella Relief Interceptor 1 ,220,000 1 ,220,000 Crescent Relief Inter- ceptor 1 ,012,000 1 ,012,000 Magnolia Interceptor Reach 30 1 , 120,000 1 , 120,000 Lampson Interceptor Reaches 11 and 12 1 ,512,000 1 ,512,000 Miscellaneous Projects 500,000 150,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 Sub-Total FR Fund 5,514,000 300,000 2,599,000 75,000 1 ,220,000 1 ,320,000 TOTAL 6, 169,000 555,000 2,699,000 175,000 1 ,320,000 1 ,420,000 w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.0.8OX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA92708 (714)540.2910 March 18, 1982 (714)962.2411 STAFF REPORT STATUS OF FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3 AND 11 In January, Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 engaged the services of Lowry & Associates to prepare an updated consolidated master plan report to evaluate the sewer needs to and beyond the year 2000. To date, the engineer has contacted many of the cities in order to update the land use plans to project future sewer needs. The consulting engineer, along with the Districts' staff, feel that the Directors of District No. 3 should consider an amendment to the existing Basic Accatmodation Agreement between Districts Nos. 3 and 11 regarding the capacities of the Miller-Holder Sewer. Sane of the pertinent facts regarding the Miller-Holder Sewer and the Basic Accommodation Agreement are as follows: . The initial backbone sewer Miller-Holder Sewer) for District No. 3 was constructed during the 1958 to 1960 era. . In 1958, District No. 3 declared that there was, at that time, excess capacity, in the amount of 4 mgd in that portion of the system from Hamilton Avenue to Treatment Plant No. 2, which could be made available to District No. 11. . A Basic Accommodation Agreement between Districts Nos. 3 and 11 was executed in December, 1960, wherein each District provided temporary sewer capacity to the other District pending completion of master planning for each District. In June, 1961, District No. 11 purchased the 4 mgd permanent excess capacity from District No. 3 in the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. • In July, 1966, District No. 3 purchased 4 mgd permanent excess capacity from District No. 11 in the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer, Newland Street Pumping Station and the Hamilton Avenue Force Main. • District No. 11 recently (1981) completed the Newland Street Interceptor diverting flows from the Miller-Holder Sewer to the new District No. 11 Coast Trunk Sewer, thereby eliminating the \%WWI use of the Newland Street Pumping Station and the Hamilton Avenue Force Main, as well as the need for the 4 mgd. March 18, 1982 Staff Report Page Two In order to proceed on schedule with the Facilities Plan, a decision to resolve the capacity ownership in the Miller-Holder Sewer should be made. The 4 mgd capacity owned by District No. 11 in the lower portion of this trunk sewer is a restriction for available capacity for the entire line serving areas all the way to the City of La Habra. Attached to this report is an updated statement of projected cash flow for this fiscal year's budget. Adjustments in the Basic Accommodations Agreement were not contemplated until next fiscal year, however sufficient funds are available if a decision is made to modify the Basic Acccrtmodation Agreement at this time. �• j' a SLATER # - fps 42 Rt •w l,u• �� ( _ .c�c,ear. ^, '14�.BF-=- j -3e171. _ _ -"'� ��.i.r :("' _� _ t— ( �' ` r� _-.'rs -•-{ ii f�i�I� �OAF_ E IS _ P E.i 3�1 i t LLIS 4-iRt*K-�S'i'F.M 4.0 MGD CAPACITY r ice_ C21 Y DISTRICT NO. 3 IN ,iDISTRICT NO. 11 SEWER . � _ ,ERNESTS.ILL NEEDED �— I: t 1--]a— (i P AVE. y �ViRf-lELQii� �� + •••••••••••....•....•• 000 •..••••••••••r" I :I�. I f..l �.��' Cl -w �- `11�-� lra„"•i. / 1 el� rw-hct ' Ii AMP—- � ;'fu��i 16 it • �`s ` ADAMS • a. � I �� it �� ; � I, Q. E1•'is _ • : ]� t��l'' r : r '". Ir+Ip�Is1Pig .II 'a t• • u t .. 'r Lu 1 • I _it • -' 11-2 • IAVE, • 0*000 tr INTERCEPTOR c - • 1. O SEWER +� - • I`_�,�1 rRp 6ANNING AVE. _ "T' , � • 1'1 .t,.,.l r "'ate^ - • �/', LEGEND ••••••••••• DISTRICT BOUNDARY O.C.$•D. • 4.0 MGD CAPACITY • BY DISTRICT NO. 11 IN PLANT = • DISTRICT NO. 3 SEWER ti�LY�i NO. 2 • NO LONGER NEEDED • _E"ihG AT— March 24, 1982 'If: 6:00 P.M. t .r=. _-- 3 f I`" •/� lIT BRICr.EN. „ • . . .LUXEMBOURGER (MAC ALLISTER). B:+I'_ . . . . . . ..tANSON. . . . . . (d1NTERS). . . . . . BORNHOFT. . . . . . . . . . . ..)TANTON. . . . . (STRAUSS). . . . . .Cox. . . . . . . . . _ (PERRY). . . . . . . .CULVER. . . . . . (SHARP). . . . . . . .EDGAR. . . . . . . (EDWARDS). . . . . .FINLAYSON. . . (FRIED), . . , . . . .HEDAA. . . . . . . (MANDIC). . . . . . .FINLEY. . . . . . (SEYMOUR�. . . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . (LE BARON), . . . .FOX, , . , , . . (WINTERS.. . . . . . BORNHOFT. . . . (LE BARON). . . . . GAMBINA. . . . . (LE BARON), , . . ,FOX. . . , . . . . . (CRANK). . . . . . . .HANSON. . . . . . (KUZNiK) . . . . . . . HOLT. . . . . . . . (HEATHER). . . . . .HART. . . . . . . . (ODLUM). , , , , . , , KAWANAMI . . . . (MAURER). . . . . . . HEATHER. . . , . SBRICKEN). , , , , ,LUXEMBOURGER KUZNIK) . . . . . . . HOLT. . . . . . . . lWIEDER). . . . . . .NESTANDE. . . . CRANK). . . . . . . .HUTCHISON. . . (VAN DASK). . . . .NIELSEN. . . . . �ODLUM). . . . . . . .KAWANAMI . . . . (CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY. . . . . . (SEITZ). . . . . . . .LASZLO. . . . . . (WEDEL). . . . . . . .ROGET. . . . . . . (BRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . SROWAN). . . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . . . (WIEDER). . . . . . .NESTANDE. . . . DISTRICT 3 - (VAN DASK). . . . .NIELSEN. . . . . (FINLEY). . . . . . .PATTINSON. . . (COLLINS). . . . . .VAN DYKE. . . . s (CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY. . . . . . . (SEITZ). . . . . . . .LASZLO. , . . w (HEATHER). . . . . .PLUMMER. . . . . (VAN DASK). . . . .ADLER. , '. ,�� + (DAVIS). . . . . . . .REESE. . . . . . I (PERRY). . . . . . . .CULVER. . . . . . +- (STANTON). . . . . .RILEY. . . . . . . (EDWARDS). . . . . .FINLAYSQNjt, . fi (WEDEL). . . . . . . .ROGET. . . . . . . (.MANDIC). . . . . . .FINLEY,;:;. ._/L + (MARSHOTT). . . . .ROMAGNINO, , . (LE BARON). . . . = . v a- (SEYMOUR). . . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . (BRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER��O — T (SALTARELLI ). . .SHARP. . . . . . . (ROWAN). . . . . . . .MULLEN. . . . . . r- (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . (DAVIS). . . . . . . .REESE. . . . . . . _� (RILEY). . . . . . . .STANTON. . . . . ' S.MARSHOTT). . . . .ROMAGNINO. , , - o� (ZOMMICK). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . , ISEYMOUR). . . . . .ROTH. . . s . . . 1 ✓ (COLLINS). . . . . .VAN DYKE. . . . (ZOMMICK). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . ✓ '' (SILLS). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS. . . (ROGET). . . . . . . .WARD. . . . . . . . f- (GREEN). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . . . . (NESTAND-). . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . (ROGET). . . . . . . .WARD. . . . . . . . (BORNHOFT). . . . .WINTERS. . ... . v (FRIED). . . . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . (NESTANDE). . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . DISTRICT_, (BORNHOFT). . . . .WINTERS. . . . . (MAURER). . . . . . . HEATHER. . . . . (STRAUSS). . . . . .COX. . . . . . . OTHERS (STANTON). . . . . . RILEY. . . . . . . DISTRICT o I.ar. ITT HARPER. . . . . . .� (CRANK). . . . . . . .HUTCHISON. . . S.LVESTER. . . v (HEATH R). . . . . .PLUMMEP. . . , . i _ LEWIS. . . . . . v (RILEY�. . . . . . . . STANTON. . . • , °'`1 CLARKE. . . . . DISTRIC ANDERSON. , . . BROWN, . . . . (SHARP). . . . . . . .EDGAR. . . . . . . BAKER. . . . (BEYER). . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . CONATSER. . . (HEATHER). . . . . . HART. . . , YOUNG. , , . . . . (BRICKEN). . . . . .LUXEMBOURGER (WIEDER). . . . . . .NESTANDE. . . . (SILLS). . . . . . . .VARDOULIS, . . WOODRUFF. . . . (GREEN). . . . . . . .WAHNER. . . . . . HOHENER. . . . , HOWARD. . . . . . DISTRICT 11 HUNT, . . . , , . , KEITH. , , . . . . (MAC ALLISTER). BAILEY, , . . . . LYNCH, , , , . . . (NESTANDE). . . . .'WIEDER. . , , . . MARTINSON, , ,_� (FINLEY). . . . . . . PATTINSON. . , N-STEVENS, . . . . 2/10/82 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post office sox 8127 of Orange County, California0844 Ellis Avenueie Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: ode DISTRICT No. 3 Area -2910 4 IIAGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 1982 - 6:00 P.M. (1) Roll call (2) Staff report on status of updating and consolidating the Master Plans of Trunk Sewers for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 being prepared by Lowry and Associates (3) Consideration of Districts 3 and 11 inter-district trunk sewer capacities (4) Other business and communications, if any (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn e? COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 March 24, 1982 SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT Engineer's Estimate of District No. 11's Capacity in District No. 3's Miller-Holder Sewer I. PURCHASED PRICE Original Invoice Amount (6/30/61) $153,302.00 Adjustments 667.96 TOTAL $15*,969.96 fir✓ II. PRESENT WORTH BASED UPON ENR INDEX* Engineering News Record (ENR) Index (June, 1961 = 835) Engineering News Record (ENR) Index (March, 1982 = 4,098) PRESENT WORTH (ENR Index Basis) $156,969.96 x 4098 = $770,361.47 835 *ENR Index Based Upon ENR=100 in 1913 III. REPLACEMENT COST 4 mgd capacity from Hamilton and Magnolia to Plant No. 2 Length = 7883 feet Pipe Size = 24-inch Slope = 0.0007 COST $175/LF x 7883 feet = $1,379,525 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 March 24, 1982 SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT Engineer's Estimate of District No. 11's Capacity in District No. 3's Miller-Holder Sewer I. PURCHASED PRICE Original Invoice Amount (6/30/61) $153,302.00 9- Adjustments �T,667.96 5 TOTAL $156,969.96 II. PRESENT WORTH BASED UPON ENR INDEX* Engineering News Record (ENR) Index (June, 1961 = 835) Engineering News Record (ENR) Index (March, 1982 = 4,098) PRESENT WORTH (ENR Index Basis) $156,969.96 x 4098 = $770,361.47 835 *ENR Index Based Upon ENR=100 in 1913 III. REPLACEMENT COST 4 mgd capacity from Hamilton and Magnolia to Plant No. 2 Length = 7883 feet Pipe Size = 24-inch Slope = 0.0007 COST $175/LF x 7883 feet = $1,379,525 ov 117111 IPA YJA Y2 C d � l C I Crv- C n "OK tot C�-F j CE A;a-0 k/14 i �Mr COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING �..� March 24, 1982 - 6:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held March 10, 1982, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the District's administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The roll was called and the secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Anthony van Dyke, Chairman, Marvin Adler, Norman Culver, Bruce Finlayson, Ruth Finley, Donald Fox, Frank Laszlo, Robert Luxembourger, Gerald Mullen, Lester Reese, Don Roth, Charles Sylvia, Burton Ward, Duane Winters DIRECTORS ABSENT: Lawrence Romagnino, Harriett Wieder STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray E. Lewis OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Joint Chairman Don Holt, Director Bob Perry, Don Martinson, Mike Swan * * * * * * * * * * * Receive and file letter from City Moved, seconded and duly carried: of Brea, re appointment of Director for March 24, 1982 That the letter dated March 22, 1982 from the Board Meeting City of Brea, appointing Councilman Donald L. Fox as the Director representing the City at the March 24, 1982 adjourned regular meeting of the District, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Declaring intent to repurchase Chairman van Dyke introduced Don Martinson of 4 MGD capacity in lower Miller- Lowry and Associates, the consulting firm Holder Trunk Sewer from District engaged by the Board to update and consolidate No. 11, subject to certain the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers along with conditions those of Districts 2 and 11. Mr. Martinson and his associate, Mike Swan, then reviewed the status of the work. Although the study is not complete, it appears from preliminary data that changing land use patterns in the cities within the District reflect increased densities that will require additional collection system capacity. In order to determine overall system requirements, the inter-district capacities of Districts 3 and 11 in the lower reaches of their respective trunk sewer facilities L..` must be addressed. r District 3 6^' 3/24/82 Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer, then reviewed the history of the inter-district capacity agreements between Districts No. 3 and 11 to accommodate transportation of flows originating in one District through the facilities of the other to minimize construction and operating costs. In 1961, District No. 11 purchased 4 MGD capacity in the District No. 3 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer from Hamilton Avenue to Treatment Plant No. 2 at a cost of $155,970. In 1966 District No. 3 purchased 4 MGD equity in the District No. 11 Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer, Newland Street Pumping Station and the Hamilton Avenue Force Main at a cost of $190,766. Because of recent completion of the first two reaches of the District No. 11 backbone Coast Highway Trunk system, it no longer requires use of the lower Miller-Holder. District No. 11 has received a favorable bid for the third reach of Coast Highway, however, presently has insufficient funding available to award the job. Mr. Lewis, noted that staff is presently assisting the consulting engineer in analyzing the existing system to determine the optimum operating mode to maximize utilization of existing capacity. A determination by the District No. 3 Board concerning the possible repurchase from District No. 11 of the 4 MGD lower Miller-Holder capacity, although not immediately needed, would aid the consulting engineers in completing their report and recommendations regarding future system requirements of each District and also provide the balance of funding needed by District No. 11 to award the next reach of the Coast Highway Trunk. After review by the Chief Engineer of the original purchase price, the present worth and estimated replacement cost of the lower Miller-Holder equity, the Board entered into a lengthy debate concerning the possible repurchase of said capacity from District No. 11. Considerable discussion centered around the appropriate method for establishing a facility valuation for such transactions. The staff also reviewed the District's current financial status. It was then moved and seconded: That the District offer to repurchase the 4 MGD capacity in the lower Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer from District No. 11 for the present worth of $770,361.47, based on the Engineering News Record (ENR) Index, as set forth on the supplemental staff report dated March 24, 1982. During the discussion that followed, it was suggested that inasmuch as the need for the capacity was future rather than immediate, consideration of the repurchase should be deferred until the Master Plan update was completed. Also suggested was the formation of a committee of Directors to meet with District No. 11 Board members to negotiate the capacity exchange. The motion was then withdrawn. Following additional consideration of facilities valuation methods and the possible precedent that the proposed action might set, it was then moved and seconded: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that $750,000 is the fair and equitable value of District No. 11's 4 MGD capacity in the Lower Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby declares its intent to offer to repurchase said capacity from District No. 11 for the amount of $750,000. -2- District 3 3/24/82 After further discussion concerning the propriety of repurchasing the lower Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer capacity before the Master Plan update is completed, it was moved and seconded to amend the motion to include the condition that the offer to repurchase said capacity be subject to: a) Provision in the agreement for purchase and sale that the repurchase amount shall not be due until District No. 11 has expended appropriated funds and connection fees to be advanced by others for the Construction of the Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 3; and, b) Adoption of a policy by the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 agreeing that future inter-district transactions for the purchase and sale of capacities in collection system facilities (sewer and pump stations) shall be valued at the booked cost of said capacity escalated based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR = 100) to the agreed transaction date. The amended motion was passed by roll call vote. Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting to adjourned at 7:25 p.m. , March 24, 1982. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California ems✓ -3-