Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-11-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 5, 1980 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1980 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. JWS: jc Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 DISTRICT 1 Wednesday, November 26th at 4:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 26th at 5:30 p.m. .'-ill FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -To be determined at Joint Board Meeting November December January ~ebruary March April May June July August September October November COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE · . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES JOINT BOARD MEETINGS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS Nov 12, 1980 Nov 26, 1980 Dec 10, 1980 None Scheduled Jan 14, 1981 Jan 28, 1981 Feb 11, 1981 Feb 25, 1981 Mar 11, 1981 Mar 25, 1981 Apr 8, 1981 Apr 22, 1981 May 13, 1981 May 27, 1981 June 10, 1981 June 24, 1981 July 8, 1981 lfone ·scheduled Aug 12, 1981 None Scheduled Sep 9, 1981 Sep 23, 1981 Oct 14, 1981 Oct 28, 1981 Nov 11, 1981 Nov 25, 1981 t-,~ ~OARDS OF DIRECTORS 1 ---· r· -- County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, CaliEomia 1 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain VaJley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Cede 714 540-2910 962-24·11 . -·· ----· ··--·-··---···--..--·- AGENDA ME.ET I NG DA TE NOVEMBER 12, ·1980 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT .. ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 -October 8, 1980, regular and October 22, 1980, adjourned District 2 -. October 8, 1980, regular District 3 -October 8, 1980, regular District 5 -October 8, 1980, regular and October 29, 1980, adjourned District 6 -October 8, 1980, regular District 7 -October 8, 1980, regular District 11 -October 8, 1980, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying pa}rment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any Districts.) See page (s) "A" and "B" ALL DISTRICTS Join1: Operating Fund Capital OuUay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital F\Uld. Self-Funded Imuranca Funds DISTRICT NO. l DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. l DISTRICT NO. S DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 10/08/80 $ 173,496.45 1,631,325.42 37,583.43 1,668.84 226,197.87 130,234.11 77,089.92 15.30 5,459.28 7,704.65 7,525.55 2,037.12 $2,300,337-94 10/22/80 $220,683.92 56, 195 .. 92 . 30,760.91 2,527.57 --· ··-·--·--- 20,_22b9~-----· -· 11,4o~~·5~·-·-·-·. ~Q.QO __ 1,~~~~~.9 ···-.... 270,_~~~-~t6 _____ .. 28 •.Z).~-~ 3~: .. ·---_ --···-·. __ . $652,501.98 (9) ALL DISTRIC'i'S CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or· member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the.public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to appTove all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not speci£ically removed from same. -2- Q I (_9) (_CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8,1980, ratifying ac.ti.on of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 4335 to Smith Electric/Unico, Inc. for ·eme.rgency Repairs to Electric Motor for No. 5 Sharples Centrifuge at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-008, increasing the total amotmt from $5,400.00 to $6,169.62 (b) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8, 1980, ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 4351 to R. E. Chubbock Company for Replacement Electric Hoist for Plant No. 1 Headworks Chlorine Tank Handling, Specification No. E-109, increasing the amount from $5,050.00 plus tax and freight to a total amount of $5,689.02; and authorizing payment to Craneveyor, Inc. for said equipment (c) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of David Erdkamp, currently an Assistant Civil Engineer with the County of Orange, as Associate Engineer, at Range 1062A, Step 4, ($14.27/hr.); and authorizing the transfer of 800 hours of accumulated sick leave to a maximum paid sick leave credit not to exceed $11,416.00, to be credited to said employee and utilized only when sick leave eamed as a District employee is exhausted, provided, as a further condition, that no portion of the transferred accumulated sick leave credit is eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination, death or retirement (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report relative to removal of sediment from the Santa Ana River by the County of Orange to be used as backfill and general fill material for the construction of secondary treatment facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 • See page "C" (e) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing emergency Purchase Order No. 4477 to Worthington Service Corporation for Repair of 24" Johnston Single-Stage Pump for No. 2 Trickling Filter, Specification No. R-009, in the amount of $10,500.00 (f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Leon and Carol McClain, et al. in the amount of $1,520,000 for alleged expenses and damages due to a fly and odor problem at Plant No. 1 during the period of June 20 -August 15, 1980, and refer to the Districts liability claims administrator and General Co\Dlsel for appropriate action (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Laboratory Bench and Fume Hood Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-073, authorizing in increase of $5,624.07 to the contract with Equinox-Malibu for lowering the floor elevation of the gas cylinder storage area and entry ramp and modifying the enclosure fence. See page "D" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- ' -· .... ~~-. . ' (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from S & J Chevrolet requesting withdrawal of their bid submitted in connection with Specification No. A-103, One (1) Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, due to omission of cleaner unit, and granting said request. See page "E" (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recoDDBendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Truck-Motlllted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, Specification No. A-103, to International Harvester Company in the amOlmt of $56, 146. OS. See page "F" (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Trailer-Mounted Air Compressor, Specification No. E-110, to Sullair of Los Angeles in the amount of $9,974.60. See page "G" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Purchase·Order No. 4596 to Dellinger Corporation for proprietary purchase of Two Repla~ement Gas Filters for Gas Compressors at Plant No. 2, Specification No. P-040, in the amount of $9,556.96 plus freight DISTRICT 2 (k) Consideration of Resolution No." 80-170-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-14-4B, to R. M. Skamnes in the amount of· $107, 358 .12. See pages "H" and "I" (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-171-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR, to L. S. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, in the amount of $153 ,010. 00. See pages "J" and "K" (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-172-2, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design ·of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21, for additional surveying work required, and increasing the authorized amount for said surveying services from $12,000 to an amotmt not to exceed $16,000. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- ·" (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 6 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-173-6, approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of Dover Drive Trtulk Meter Vault and Connecting Sewer, .Contract No. 6-8, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "M" DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of motion authorizing payment to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the amotult of $15,345.02 for emergency repairs to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street damaged by Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., contractor for Pacific Telephone Company (p) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., dated October 27, 1980, denying responsibility for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street. See page "N" (.q) Consideration of motion directing the staff to file a claim against Pacific Telephone Company and Pacific Pipeline Construction Co. for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street in the amol.lllt of $15,345.02 plus District expenses; and authorizing the General Counsel to file any necessary legal proceedings to recover said damages END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- - (11) ALL DISTRICTS ,,~-·-. ·' Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate the purchase of a maximum of four (4) Ashbrook Simon Hartley (Winklepress) belt filter presses, Specification No. E-111, for use in the Districts' sewage sludge dewatering operation for consideration by the Boards at the December 10th Joint Board meeting (identical to ten units being installed under Job No. P2-24-2, Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities for the Solids Handling ~ and Dewatering Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2) See page "0" (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services re Task 1 of the Phase II Modifications and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACTS). See page "P" Cb) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-169, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services re Phase II Modifications and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant, and.providing for Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for said work, subject to receipt of approval and grant assurances for said work from the State Water Resources Control Board, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $598,500.00 for Task 1 work. See page "Q" (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accotmtants, for the year ending June 30, 1980 (previously mailed to Directors by auditors) (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Division 1, Oxygen Generation & Storage Facilities, and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities, for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-2, authorizing an addition of $66,893.32 to the contract with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for miscellaneous modifications required in the cryogenic process and interfacing of Jobs Nos. P2-23-2 and P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. See page "R" (.15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider personnel matters relative to meet-and-confer sessions with employee units (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action, if any, on items discussed in executive session (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, November 26, 1980V (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and conununications or supplemental ·agenda items, if any -6- : (21) DISTRICT 2 (22) (23) (24) C.2-s) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 6 Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, authorizing an addition of $89,455.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. & John A. Artukovich, Jr., J.V. for miscellaneous modifications, dewatering and extension of tunnel See page "S" DISTRICT 11 Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT S Consideration of actions relative to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report re Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage Area: (a) Verbal staff report re Coastal Commission hearing on November 10th on application for Coastal Commission·permit re sewerage improvements for the Big Canyon drainage area (b) Verbal report of engineering consultant, EDAW, Inc., re Final Supplemental EIR (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received after public hearing on October 29th re Draft Supplemental EIR, if any (d) Discussion and further staff comments (e) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report re Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage Area; and certify that said Final Supplemental EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, As Amended (Copy of said report to be delivered to District 5 Directors) -7- (32) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of approval of best alternative project to sewer the Big Canyon drainage area (33) DISTRICT 5 Other business and conmnmications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- II ,, -BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 812i oE Orange County, Califomia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AG EM DA MEETING· DATE NOVEMBER 12, 1980 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOiNING THE DISTRICTS'. BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3). Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) ·Recognition.of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive. and file minute excerpts, if any Sec sapplcmcatal agcnc1a (6) EACH DISTRICT (7) ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 . . -October 8, 1980, regular and October 22, 1980, adjourned District 2 District 3 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 11 ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: October 8, 1980, regular -October 8, 1980, regular -October 8; 1980, regular and October 29, 1980, adjourned -October 8, 1980, regular -October 8, 1980, regular -October 8, 1980, regular ~ q!Jc6'- ,, 1% I(µ_ 'Hfl}(, (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager 0 ,, 1 ~:1J I "~:10 ~ " , csD (c) General Counsel (8) ~Oil CALL VOTE--- ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented wiless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any Districts.) See page (s) "A" and "B" ALL DISTRICTS Join'C Operadng Fwid Capital Outlay Revolving Fwid - Joint Working Capi1:al Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. l DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. S DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 10/08/80 $ 173,496. 45 1 ,631,325.42 37,583.43 1,668.84 226,197,87 130,234. 11 77,089.92 15.30 5,459.28 7,704.65 7,525.55 2,037 .12 $2,300,337.94 10/22/80 $220,683.92 56,195.32 30,760.91 2,527.57 9,802.35 20,551.98 !1,405.52 230.00 1,438.60 270, 186.96 28,718.35 $652,501.98 (9) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all ~genda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8,1980, ratifying ac.tion of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 4335 to Smith. Electric/Unico, Inc. for· ·emergency Repairs to Electric Motor for No. 5 Sharples Centrifuge at Plant No. 1-,-·· -· - Specification No. R-008, increasing the total amount from $5,400.00 to $6,169.62 (b) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8~ 1980, ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 4351 to R. E. Chubbock Company for Replacement-frle·ctric Hoist for Plant No. 1 Headworks Chlorine Tank HandJing, . . Specification No. E-109, increasing the amount from $5, 05 0. 00 plus tax and freight to a total amount of $5,689.02; and authorizing payment to Craneveyor, Inc. for said eq_lJ.:ipm~nt (c) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of David Erdkamp, currently an Assistant Civil Engineer with the Coun-ey_of Orange, as Associate Engineer, at Range 1062A, Step 4, ($14.27/hr.); and authorizing the transfer of 800 hours of accumulated sick leave to a maximum paid sick leave credit not to exceed $11,416.00,. to be credited to said employee and utilized only when sick leave earned as a District employee is exhausted, provided,·as a further condition, that no portion of the transferred accumulated sick leave credit is eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination, death or retirement (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report relative to removal of sediment from the Santa Ana River by the County of .. _ Orange to be used as backfill and general .fill material for the -·· construction of secondary treatment facilities at Treatment· Plant No. 2 . See page "C" (e) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing emergency Purchase Order No. 4477 to Worthington Service Corporation for Repair of 24" Johnston Single-Stage Pump for No. 2 Trickling Filter, Specification No. R-009, in the amount of $10,500.00 (f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Leon and Carol McClain, et al. in the amount of $1,520,000 for alleged expenses and damages due to a fly and odor problem at Plant No. 1 during the period of June 20 -August 15, 1980, and refer to the Districts liability claims administrator and General Cotmsel for appropriate action (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Laboratory Bench and Fume Hood Additions at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-073, authorizing in increase of $5,624.07 to the contract with Equinox-Malibu for lowering the floor elevation of the gas cylinder storage area and entry ramp and modifying the enclosure fence ... See page "D" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- ' (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from S & J Chevrolet requesting withdrawal of their bid submitted in connection with Specification No. A-103, One (1) Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, due to omission of cleaner unit, and granting said request. See page "E" (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, Specification No. A-103, to International Harvester Company in the amount of $56,146.05. See page "F" Ci) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Trailer-Mounted Air Comr~essor, Specification No. E-110, to Sullair of Los Angeles in the amount of $9,974.60. See page "G" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Purchase-Order No. 4596 to Dellinger Corporation for proprietary purchase of Two Repla~ement Gas Filters for Gas Compressors at Plant No. 2, Specification.No. P-040, in the amount of $9,556.96 plus freight DISTRICT 2 (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-170-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-14-4B, to R. M. Skamnes in the amount of· $107, 358 .12. See pages "H" and "I" (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-171-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR, to L. S. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, in the amount of $153,010.00. See pages "J" and "K" (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-172-2, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry & Associates for design ·of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21, for additional surveying work required, and increasing the authorized amount for said surveying services from $12,000 to an amotlllt not to exceed $16,000. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 6 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-173-6, approving-plans and specifications for Abandonment of Dover Drive Trunk Meter Vault and Connecting Sewer, Contract No. 6-8, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "M" DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of motion authorizing payment to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the amotmt of $15,345."02 for emergency repairs to District's RA-30 Subtrwik Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street damaged by Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., contractor for Pacific Telephone Company (p) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., dated October 27, 1980, denying responsibility for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street. See page "N" (q) Consideration of motion directing the staff to file a claim against Pacific Telephone Company and Pacific Pipeline Construction Co. for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street in the amount of $15,345.02 pltis District expenses; and authorizing the General Cotmsel to file any necessary legal proceedings to recover said damages END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate the purchase of· a maximum of ~our (4) Ashbrook Simon Hartley (Winklepress) belt filter presses, Specification No. E-111, for use in the Districts' sewage sludge dewatering operation for consideration by the Boards at the December 10th Joint Board meeting (identical to ten units being installed under Job No. P2-24-2, Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities for the Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2) See page "0" (.12) ALL DISTRICTS (.a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Conunittee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services re Task 1 of the Phase II Modifications and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACTS). See page "P" (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-169, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services re Phase II Roll call Vote or Cast Modifications and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL-ACTS Pilot unanimous BaUot Plant, and· providing for Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for said work, subject to receipt of approval and grant assurances for said work from the State Water Resources Control Board, on a per diem fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $598,500.00 for Task 1 work. See page "Q" (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1980 (previously mailed to Directors by auditors) (14) ALL DISTRICTS (.15) (_16) (17) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Division 1, Oxygen Generation & Storage Facilities, and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities, for 75-MGD Improved Tre~tment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-2, authorizing an addition of $66,893.32 to the contract with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for miscellaneous modifications required in the cryogenic process and interfacing of Jobs Nos. P2-23-2 and P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. See page "R" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider personnel matters relative to meet-and-confer sess)..ons with employee units r~ ''> ' ,,,.--ALL DISTRICTS o.~) Consideration of action, if anr,,, on items discussed in executive session '?):-< z I.· f ,,c ;Jc t./: c-J fl .A- ALL DISTRICTS Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any {19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, November 26, 1980k:J1l (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -6- (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn 0 :>D (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and comrnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn J-:;i ~...; (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and comrnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to ad journ f ·J'6 (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business a nd comrnunications or supplementa l agenda items , if any ( 27) DISTRICT 7 (28) (29) Consideration of motion to adjourn Y ·_ro DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 a nd 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, authorizing an addition of $89,455.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. & John A. Artukovich, Jr., J.V. for mis ce llaneous modifications, dewatering and extension of tunnel See p age "S" DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supp l emental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn y _) ) (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions relative to the Supp l emental Environmental Impact Report re Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage Ar ea : (a) Verbal ~taf~ report re Coastal Commission hearing on Nov embe r 10th c;m app lica tion for .Co astal Commission p e rmit re sewerage improvements for t h e Big Canyo n drainage area (b) Verbal report of engineering consultant, EDAW, In c ., re Final Supplemental EIR (c) Consideration of motion to r eceive and file written comments received after public h earing on October 29th re Draft Suppleme nta l EIR, if any (d) Discussion and further staff comrnents Reso, No. 80 ~174-5 (e) Consideration of mt>~i-0n to receive, file and approve Final Supplemental Impact Report re Sewerage Impro vements for Bi g Ca nyon ' Th e Gen era l Co un s el wil l ; and certify that said Final Supplemental EIR has b een co mment re chan g ing this compliance with the State and District Guid e lines ite m t o a reso lut i on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, As Ame nd ed report to be delivered to District 5 Directors) -7 - (32) DISTRICT 5 (33) Consideration of approval of best alternative project to sewer the Big Canyon drainage area ~ 4 161-i C,_, Q, ()IL( /~ ~uJ u<-. .DISTRICT 5 . ''>r ~'-'-H·t.-, t ~ r.el.i.,:~ Other business and CODDlll.Dlications or supplemental agenda items, if any . (34) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adj oum f; t1 -8- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County .3onitotion Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date November 12, 1980 -7:30 p.m. Post OHice Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92 70 8 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills ·paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. Joint Boards No . 9-a and b -Amending Board Action re Purchase Orders Nos. 4351 and 4JJ5. These two actions increase the Boards' October authorizations for the replacement of the electric hoist at Plant No. 1 (Increased cost $769.62) and for emergency repairs to an electric motor (Increased cost, $639.02) for a sludge centrifuge, also at Plant No. 1. These items were of an emergency nature and the initial quotations re- ceived from the vendors did not reflect the final cost after all the work was performed. The staff recommends amending these purchase orders as shown. No. 9-c -Consideration of Employment of David Erdkamp as Associate Engineer. ... Mr. David Erdkamp, age 42, presently employ ed as Assistant Civil Engineer with the County of Orange, has applied for the position of Associate Engineer with the Districts. He has been employed with EMA for approximately 17~ years, working primarily on design of flood and road facilities. In seeking the position of Associate Engineer with the Districts, Mr. Erdkamp has requested that his sick leave, accumulated while an employee of the County, be transferred to his employment with the Districts on condition that it would only be used after the sick leave earned while employed by the Districts was exhausted . The transferred sick leave from County service would not be considered for payoff at termination, death o r retire- ment and would be valued at the hire-in amount of $14 .27 per hour. The maximum sick leave liability to the Districts would be 800 hours, not to exceed $11,416 . The staff recotillilends acceptance of Mr. Erdkamp's request and his hiring at Step 4 as Associate Engineer. All employee benefits other than the above-mentioned transfer of sick leave will be the same as for any new employee. No. 9-d -Removal of Sediment from the Santa Ana River. At the October Board meeting, the staff requested and the Boards granted authority to negotiate with the County of Orange for sediment removed from the Santa Ana River . At that time, the staff pointed out that the material could cost as much as $2 .00 per yard or could be offered at no expense to the Districts. The County of Orange has now received bids and hopes to award a contract soon. The contractor's bid provides that approximately 150 ,000 yards of sediment from the Pacific Ocean to Hamilton Avenue be delivered to the Districts' Plant No. 2 site at no cost . ,Upstream of Hamilton Avenue, the Districts have the option to pay the difference between the contractor's price to remove and keep the dirt or a higher price to deliver the dirt to the Districts' site. The staff recon:nnends accepting the 150,000 yards at no cost and not receiving the upstream sediment. The 150,000 yards should be adequate for near term requirements. There is a possibility, however, that the Corps of Engineers may not issue a permit to the County for removal of this sediment, and if so, the County may not be able to award the contract. No. 9-e -Ratification of Staff's Action in Issuing Purchase Order No. 4477 for Repairs of the P-ump for· the No. 2 Trickling Filter. This motion requests ratification of the staff's action in authorizing emergency repairs to be made to the 24-inch Johnston single-stage pump for the No. 2 trickling filter. This pump is the key element in moving the wastewater through this secondary treatment stage. The staff requests approval of payment for repair of this pump for an amount not to exceed $10,500. No. 9-g -Change Order No . 1 to Job No. PW-073. The staff is requesting approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $5,624.07 to the contract. The contractor, Equinox- Malibu, was directed by the staff to lower the floor elevation of the gas cylinder storage area and entry ramp and to modify the enclosure fence. The additional cost is based on time and materials -2- in-accordance with the specifications. The staff recommends approval of this change order which increases the contract amount from $88,750 to $94,374.07. There is no time extension allowed for the work. No. 9-h -Award of Flush Truck -Bid Specification No . A-103, --···-·--. -· ROtihfi~d Hydraulic s ·ewer Cleaner. _____ . Five bids were received October 28th for a flush truck. The apparent low bid of $27,296 .06 (S & J Chevrolet) was priced in error. According to the bidder, the price shown includes the cab and chassis only. We have received a letter from S & J Chevrolet requesting their bid be withdrawn due to the obvious error. It is recommended that the bid from S & J Chevrolet be rejected due to incompleteness. There is a tie bid from two companies for the lowest responsible bid. It is further recommended that the award be made to International Harvester Company for their bid of $56,146.05 including sales tax on the basis of their Company location in Orange County. (Budget, $65, 000) . No. 9-i -Award of Specification No. E-110. Four bids were received on October 28, 1980 for the purchase of One (1) Trailer-Mounted Air Compressor. The bids ranged from a low of $9,974.60 submitted by Sullair of Los Angeles, to a high of $11,221.16. The staff recommends award of this equipment purchase contract to Sullair in the low bid amount of $9,974 .60. (Budget, $12 '000) .. District No . 2 No. 9-k -Award of Contract No . 2-14-4B. Three bids were received on November 4th ranging from a low of $107,358.12 to a high of $119,000. The engineer's estimate for the work was $61,000. Since the three bids are close to each other, the staff believes that the engineer's estimate was not realistic and recommends award to A. M. Skamnes, the low bidder, for $107,358.12. This project is the construction of an emergency control gate on the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. The gate, to be located adjacent to La Palma Avenue and Weir ~any?n Road (projected~ would allow the District to shut down the line in the event of a rlood washout by the Santa Ana River upstream within Santa Ana Canyon. The shut down would prevent the floodwaters from filling this major trunk facility and reaching our treatment plants. No. 9-1 -Award of Contract No. 2-14-SR. Bids were received on November 4th for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR. Four bids were received, ranging from a low of $153,010, su~mitted by L. S. Hawley Corp., and Paul Hubbs of Irwindale, to a high of $247,125. -3- The engineer's estimate for this work was $198,000. The staff recotmilends award to L. S. Hawley Corporation and Paul Hubbs of Irwindale ·in the low bid amount of $153,010 . It should be noted that the Distri ct has received approval for expenditures in the amount of $121,000 for this corrective contract from the Federal Government Disaster Relief Fund as the work was necessitated by the heavy rains in storm season 1979-80 during which the Santa Ana River changed course. The staff will continue to negotiate with the Disaster Relief office in an attempt to receive full funding for the project . No. 9-m -Approving Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry & Associates. At the May, 1979 meeting, the Board of Directors of District No. 2 approved an agreement for $50,000 plus actual costs of pre- liminary and construction surveys not to exceed $12,000 in con- nection with the design of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor . This project has gone through final design and the construction is pre- sently in progress. The engineer has requested an increase in the surveying per diem authorization from $12,000 to an amount not to exceed $16,000. This increased cost is a result of additional survey work required to realign the sewer in the field upon discovery of undisclosed utilities particularly oil and gas lines. The staff reconnnends approval of this $4,000 increase. District No. 6 No. 9-n -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Dover Meter Vault, Contiact No. 6-8. The engineer has completed the preparation of plans and speci- fications for the Dover Meter Vault . This project removes the vault which has not been operative for several years to allow better flow conditions in the sewer, as well as minimizing maintenance . The engineer's estimate for this project is $30,000. (Budget, $50,000). District No. 7 No. 9-o, p, q -Authorizing Payment to John A. Artukovich for Emergency Repairs to RA-30 Sewer Line. On October 11th, a Pacific Telephone contractor, Pacific Pipeline Construction Company , damaged the District's RA-30, 12-inch subtrunk sewer located easterly of MacArthur Boulevard at Main Stree t within the City of Irvine. The District staff ordered the necessary e~ergency repairs to the line in order to protect the public health and safety . As can be se.en from the letter in your agenda material, Pacific Pipeline routinely denied any responsibility for the repairs. -4- The actions appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the October 27th letter from Pacific Pipeline and to authorize payment of $15,345.02 to John A. Artukovich for emergency repair of the line . The staff recommends that the General Counsel be directed to pursue the reimbursement of all costs from either the · Pacific Telephone Company or their contractor. All Dis·tricts No _. 11 -Consideration of Motion Authorizing General Manager to Neaotiate for Purchase of a Maximum of Four Ashbrook Simon Hartle Winklepress , Speci ication No. E-1 During the preparation of the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-24-2, Solids Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities at Plant No. 2, the belt filter presses to be furnished were pre- qualified in accordance with EPA regulations . Several manufacturers of belt filter presses were evaluated, resulting in only two of the nine companies being recommended for inclusion in the specifications to submit price quotations to prospective bidders for this project. This project was delayed approximately three months because of pro- tests filed by three of the disqualified manufacturers , however , EPA did uphold· ·the findings of the Districts' Boards of Directors and staff .. ,· · ii ·,; Bids for this $15 million project at Plant No . 2 were received in August, 1980 and the contractor has indicated he will supply ten presses manufactured by Ashbrook Simon Hartley (Winklepress) . It is the staff's recorrnnendation that consideration should be given to t h e purchase of three or four additional presses at this time from the manufacturer. A staff report is included in the agenda material, Page "O". It is recommended that the General Manager, in consultation with the Joint Chairman and General Counsel, negotiate the purchase of additional belt presses for Board consideration at the December meeting . No. 12-a and b -Selection Corrnnittee Certification re Final Negotiated Fee with John Garollo Engineers on Task I of Phase II Modifications on JPL-ACTS Process. Pursuant to the Boards' authorization , the Selection Corrrrnittee has negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services in connection with the JPL-ACTS process . A Committee report and recommendation is enclosed in the supporting documents. See Page "P". No. 13 -Annual Report for Year Ended ~une 30 , 1980. The Districts 1 auditors, Peat., Marwick, Mitchell & Company have mailed to each Director a copy of the completed annual audit -5- report . The action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file it. If any Director has any questions concerning the report , please call our Districts' Director of Finance, Wayne Sylv ester, or the General Manager (telephone 540-2910). No. 14 -Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P2-23-2 . This contract with Air Products, Inc., in the amount of $8.3 million for the furnishing of the Oxygen Generation and Dissolution Equipment, is a part of the 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 , and was awarded in December, 1977. Since the award of the con- tract, the Districts' staff and consulting engineers have been working closely with the contractor in the construction of the cryrogenic oxygen generation facilities. Most of this equipment, which is valued at approximately $6.6 million of the total contract amount, was constructed at the main manufacturing plant of Air Products in Allentown, PA. The plans and specifications were prepared to allow competitive pricing from Union Carbide as well as Air Products. There have been several months of discussions between the contractor, the Districts' staff and the Districts' consulting engineer to resolve the intentions of the plans and specifications as well as the proprietary equipment furnished by Air Products. This change order includes 31 items of contract changes result- ing in a total addition to the contract in the amount of ~66,893 .32. Many of the items contained in this change order are the result of the interfacing between this contract and the $30 million contract known as P2-23-6 to construct the secondary treatment facilities as designed. The staff recommends approval of this change order which represents approximately 8/lOths of one percent of change in the total contract amount. No . 15 -Executive Session re Meet-and-Confer Personnel Matters . A separate status report from the Special Committee on Personnel Guidelines for Management will be sent to active Directors before Wednesday's Board meeting for consideration in executive session. District No . 11 No. 28 -Authorizigg_ Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11 -1 3-2 . This change order adds $89,455 to the contract amount, making the total contract for this work $7,816,514 .62. The original specifications and the dewatering permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board allowed a de - watering discharge line across the State beach . However, the State Department of Harbors, Beaches and Parks declined to issue a permit. -6- Therefore, the contractor was directed to construct a line to the Santa Ana River, a distance of 4,000 feet. It. was determined in the field that the siphon under the Southern California Edison cooling lines had to ·be lowered an additional six feet to protect these critical lines. This additional depth substantially increased the _dewatering discharge from that which was originally anticipated and exceeded the hydraulic capacity of the 4,000 foot dewatering discharge line. Accordingiy, a relief dewatering system was constructed to the Talbert Channel at Brookhurst using additional pipe and pumps. The third major item of work on this change order involves the construction of the tunnel under the Talbert Flood Control Channel at Brookhurst Street. This tunnel had to be lengthened in order to avoid construction within the flood control right of way and to provide a safe working area. Again, field investigati on determined that the flood control right of way was saturated and the staff was concerned that the levee might collapse into the channel if the tunnel was not extended . District No . 5 No. 31 -Staff Report on Coastal Commission Hearing and Approval of Final EIR for Big Canyon Drainage Area. As the Directors are aware, the District's application for a Coastal Cormnission permit for this project will be heard on November 10, 1980. The project has received a favorable Commission staff report. A verbal report on the outcome of the hearing will be pre- sented to the Board Wednesday night. On October 8th, the Directors received, filed and set for hearing the Draft EIR on this project. The public hearing was held on October 29th. The CEQA requirements for an EIR have been met and copies of the document were sent to all State, Federal and local agencies for comment as well as to interested parties and the news media. The action on your agenda is to receive and file any written comments received since the October 29th public hearing, including any conditions required by the Coastal Commission, and then to adopt and certify the EIR after final determination of what will be the approved project. -7- Fred A. Harper General Manager RESOLUTIONS· AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NOVEMBER 12>. _ 1980 -7 :30 P·.·M·.: I :::: :t::- 1 t-A I :::: •J:> en rn 2 t:'J :1> ......... -I rt1 3 ~ 00 )> r-r- t:j ....... en --4 :;a ~ n -I :.n == 1:::- 1 ...... :::: ( FUND NO 91~9 -Jl DIST WORKING CAl 1 ITAL P~OC(SSINb O~TE 10/031~0 PAG( RlPORT NUMBER AP43 \IARRANl NO. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR~NGE COUNTY VENDOR ADVANCED CLCCTRONICS Alll CALIF ORN IA AIH P~ODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC! AHfRJCAN CYANAKID COHPANY AMERICAN SCJENJIFIC PRODUCTS ~"uooo co., 1~c._ THf. ANCHOR PACKiNG CO. ANIXTt:R PttU2AN ARBOR NURSERY. . . ASSOCIATED OF LOS ANGELES AUlo Sttof [GUJPHCNT co. A Vt: ft Y . l AP fL . . . ___ . ... . . __ .. BANCROFT-~HITN£Y CO• BANNING BATTERY CO. BAHNE~. & O[LA.Nty ___ ...... . DECKMAN INSTRUMENTS JOHN G. BELL CO. 8E~Z ENGhn~tR.IN<!.e_lN~ .• --··· ··-·--···---·· JAH£S MNZJE BLUE S(AL LINEN SUPPLY ~Of1"ft HAGNr.TO. St:ftYICE.a._ H~C.1 BRANDEL HECHANICAL, INC. lil.C. OROOKE BUlHR PHllNttRHHh INC! ... CS COHPANY CTA•S lRUCK DRIVER SCHOOL CALGO~ CQ~PORATl~N CLAJHS PAID 10/08/80 AMOUNT OfSCR I Pll ON .. 5196.00 ELECTRONIC PAGER REPAIRS $2~~.oo AIR FARE i~ql,725,60 CONTRACTOR P2-23-2 $~1282•63 CHEMICALS $2~5.62 LAB SUPPLIES ,l,lQ&,p5 ·-ENGINE R~PAIRS $108.70 ENGINE PARTS $423.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $530,00 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES $584.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S68D•52 HYDRAULIC JACK ~~~2!!0~ -· ______ OFFICE SUPP.L.IES. $583.00 PUBLICATIONS S~~.29 T~UCK BATTERl~S H~~·f!J . BEARING. SUP.PLIES S795.70 CONTROLS $313.44 ENGINE PARTS _ ... .U'h' ~-_ ...... -··-·-.ruttr rARn ·-· .. Sl74.60 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE S75.00 TOWEL RENTAL .... ~llh~~ .. . ... rYHP ft~rAIRS. $4,218•22 CONTRACTOR PW-066-2 Sl5.~0 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE -··· .12h7.Q'h~s . ···-·----~HGB, P1-n-:-~ •. n-il-:-§ •. n-~~ S505.68 VALVES S450.00 TRAJNING COURSES ~~77!00 C"£HICAL~ s1.113.86 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS ( 051854 051855 051856 051857 osusn C5185q 05 ll\60 051861 051862 051863 05ltt6't O~lt!65 051866 051867 051860 051869 051870 05167J 051872 051873 051BH 05Hs75 051876 051871 051870 051679 051880 051881 051882 051883 05188'1 05188!> 0518116 051687 051881\ 051889 051890 05USIJ1 05189? 051893 o51a911 051895 0518% 051897 051896 05Ht99 CAMPBELL HEATING a AIR CONDITIONING JOHN C~ROLLO ENGINEERS s21.3&2•67 ENGR. P2-24, CONST. P2-24, 0 & H P2-24 ~O~N CAROL~P ENG/GR~£~~y HAN~£H CASTLE CONTROLS, INC• CHEVRON u.s.A., INC. CO~ST ffR~ ~QU(~H~NJ . COAST INSURANCE AGENCY CQLJCH & SONSt ~ JOINT VENTURE ~9~Hi~c~ ~TATIQN~~s ~~P. f61"T~~s CQRr~ CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CONTINENTAL tHCHICAL CO COSlA HfSA. AUTO P~~T~t INC, HR. CRANE OEK/ELECTRO, INC. OAH.Y PILOT DAYLIGHT TttANSPORT INC. DICK SONS NJ~K DlOOVlC ANP ~,~,·ZAR~OJ~A. TH£ ORAUJNG BOARDe INC• ~3,~6-h68. . .... o ~ t1 Pi ·B, CQHST. r2.:Zl Sl&0.31 VALVES S209.88 PAINT SUPPLIES s28.?2 FIRE ~XTIHGYISijfft HAINT~NAHC~ S482.00 1USURANCE PREHIUH $70,672.85 CONTRACTOR 5-21-1, 5-22 s~!~3 •. __ _ .... Off.ICE ~UP.PLlf;S $7q0.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $59,60~.52 CHLORIN~ ~5~~2~ . TRUCK PARTS s531.00 CRANE RENTAL $39.42 tfflCE SUPPLIES Sll~l? SPE,lflCATIQH ~:IQS ~~GAL "PV~RTISIH~ S49.14 FREIGHT S636•00 AIR CONDITIONER Sl2~1~93.00 CO.HTRACTQ~ 3-Z.2-3 S237.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES ....... I I. I I .. I ! . ! . .I I" .. I• i ·: I ! 1· . ., I I . i. I :i: f lJNO NQ ~ I N :::: \.IARRANT NO. 051900 051901 05190;? 051903 05190/t 051905 051906 051907 )> D5190U G> 051909 rn :z: 051910 t:::j 05l'Hl j> 051912 051913 ........ -t 0519llf rn 0519l!l 3 051916 :::.t: 05)911 00 051911\ 051919 I 051'>20 J:> 051921 I 05192?. I 05192J 05192't t::J 051925 i--t (./) 0'31926 -t 051927 ;u 051928 i--t 051929 ~ 051930 (/.) 0511J31 051~3~ 05193.?. 05193'1 05t935 051936 051937 051CJ3U 051939 0519/tO 0519/tl 051942 051943 • j 0519't't 0519't5 I ::: I> I ...,) :::: ( 9)~' -JT PJ~T ~P~KINP CAPITA~ PROCESSING' OAT[ 10/03/60 PAGE .[PORT NuMDER.AP't3 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAJMS PAfO 10/08/60 VENDOR DUNN COWARDS CORP. £.O.A.Uet INC. EA$TMMh me~ ENCHANTER, INC. [QUI NO x-HALJ OU EQUINOX -HALJl)U ~i~~~~·ioN~~~ii-co; fl 0-SY STE HS ~~1ff9R0 A· fORKERT_ FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAHCRA FoxnORO HUNJCIPAL SALES, INC. A~ft fpf;Y .. . ... ···--·· ..... _. ____ .. ·--·--·· GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. GOULD, INC.-MARREN & BAILEY G~PTH ~"EV~OLET ~n~ . HAAKER [QUJPffENT cO. GEORG[ T. HALL CO. L.A~RV. ttHb~~ _ . --··· HOLLYMOOO TIRE Of ORANGE HONE YW[LL, l NC. ttOvst 9f .UA TT£~ H ~ .... . . ·-· UOUARO SUPPLY CO. HUNDLEY COHPANY. INC. CHY. Pf Hl•.~H N~_T PN. P.~ ~~11 . _____ . -··. . . . _ . -··· flUtll lNGTON SUPPLY J.H.H. ENTERPRISES K Cf;N AN PI Pf: ~ SlJPPb.Y .t.9 ! --· KCLCO SALES l £NGINC[RJNG CO. KING DEARING, INC. KLC£N-LJNE CORP k~rii ·1~6li~TRj~[-sup~[~cs L.u.".s., 1,.,c. ~AU~~~N CO~OR LAP. LlfTZAU PATTCHNS, INC. HAHKSON SCIENC[ INC. HATT -~~LOR, '~~! MCCALLA BROS. PUHP & DRILLING HCHAST£R-CARR SUPPLY CO. Hl~E SAFETY Ap~~l~NCES ~Q. HORGAN [QUJPH£NT co. HULTJQUfPt INC. CITY Of NEMPORT BEACtl Nonoco PRODUCTS -· NOTTINGHAM PACIFIC CO. OC~AN SA~T co,~ ~N~~ ORANGE TOOL HART AHOUNT s.302. ss '"•716.60 o ,210.oa s3,sno.oo 1221680.21 .f.'15,621.00 · · iiiHi:oo $316.79 s~,0?9'!50 $300.35 '3"3.81 s't't .ao ----·-···· ··-$~l)Q;2f S.582.25' $77.00 u ,399:86 · S791.28 .. ~6.~.!~Q S755.l5 $157.49 s57.28 $ 1 • 3 ci 3 • 9 1 ··· S576e't5 $9.31 . ----.. . . ·,c,92~ 96. .. S236.78 S'\50.29 -·· $80;02 $380.45 $317.58 . ··-·s691 :a6 Uel68e29 . !305~28 Sltl69.0 S56.76 S638.55 s21,a5•.96 $10.45 $6 I .17 $176.68 S't9el9 ss.oo $132~93 S7't.20 $25'h 07 S't;il't.00 DESCRIPTION PAINl" SUPPLIES EIR BJG CANYON (>ff ,Cf: $LIPPLI~~ OCEAN HON ITOR I NG CONTRACTOR Pl-3-2, PW-073 ~ONTR~CTO~ rw-07~ CONTROLS PUHP PARTS ~~RY~Y r~-;3~§. s-~~ FILH PROCESSING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES EHPLOVEE MILEAGE tf i.e PHONE .. ---·· ..... GAUGES TRUCK PARTS MANHOLE COVER LIFTERS CONTROLS TRUCK REPA'R'S titlitK T fRES .. STRIP CHARTS BATTERIES PiPE .. SUPPLIES CONTROLS WATER USEAGE . ·si1Ai[ HARDWARE ... SHALL HARDWARE PIPE SUPPLIES RUBBER PRODUCTS BEARING SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TOOLS -. -·-· ... --. ··-· WELDING SUPPLJES FILtt PROCESSING PUMP PARTS -. . . LAB SUPPLIES CONTROLS CONTRACTOR E-090 SHALL HARDWARE DETECTOR TUBES TRUCK PARTS .. TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT RENTAL SALT SUPPLIES BAN'DSAW HOTOR ? - ( "' . .... . ::: :t> I \.N ::: )> G'> rn .. ._.. s J> ........ --4 rT1 3 ::s:t:: 00 )> .--.-- t=' ..__. (./') ~ :::;o ........ ~ (./') ::: :;,-:::. I . \.N ::: ( FUND NO 9JY~ -JT DIST ~ORKlNG CAPITAL PROCESSING 0~1£ 10/P3/QO PALE R[PORT NUH8[R AP~3 3 WARRANT NO. 0519't6 0519"7 05 l 9't n 05l9't9 051950 05)95t 051952 0~195!1 0519~q 051955 051956 051957 0519511 05195~ 0 5t 960 051961 051962 05196~ Q5196't 051965 05l'j66 051967 05t91>tt 0~1969 051970 051971 05197? 051973 05191'1 051975 051976 051977 051978 05197CJ 0519HO 051981 051982 05t9R3 05198't 051965 051986 ()5t987 051988 05198') 0519'JO 0519')1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIO lO/Oslao VlNOOR ORANGE VALVE & f lllJNG CO. OXYGfN SERVJCC COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT~ Of ORANGE COUNTY PACJFJC TfLCPHONE PARAHOUNT cou1PH[NT RENTAL ANO SALES, INC. PA~GAS __ ·- PEAT, HARYICK, HJTCHELL & co. PENN&1ALT CORP. C. NORMAN PETERSON co. C9.~TP. PICKMICK PAPER PROOUCTS PIONEER CONSULTANTS f.ITNtY.OOMCS ·-·· ..•. ··-··-·· HAROLD PRIHROS( ICE PRKACIN cO. ANO RUNJ[ CORP. lti[ RADIATOR f ACTOBY ...... . rnr RCGJST£R AHOUNT S52.15 ~56.70 '11668.Alt U07.38 $151.05 ~~0:$~5? s6,s22.oo Sl77.89 $53'tt~l5.'t0 1523.26 u,aH.11 ..... IHtf>Ll S2o\.OO s226,t25.oo ~u~, 5P s221.10 S't,CJOOeOO S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG., INC. SArrn OOLLAft OUU.Nl:::ss. Fo.BJ:\~ .. -··--. S(E OP lJCS --· -· ····----. -. ----~~,.!i~~f> $32.60 SttALLER & LOHR, INC• StlA~RQtJ( SUPPL l ....•. ---·· ····--·-···· ...... _____ ·-__ SttrR" IN WILLI AHS SILVERI & RUIS CONST. CO. SHtTtl:-f.MERY co~ -.... -· ·-H.c. SMITH CONSTRUCTION co. SOUTH ORANG( SUPPLY SOUTH£RN C~~lf ! CP.ISQN CQ• SO. CALIF. WATCR CO. SOUTHERN COUNTIES Oil Co. $0UTliPQ~l £0~HPt1.EtH (;~~-~ ! . SOUTHWEST FLCXJBLE SEWER r.ourp SPARKLETlS DRINKING WATER STAf\0~ Sl~El- STC UAR 1 COHPANY SUPfR CHCH CORP SVF(R VACV~~ Mf~• ~9!1 IN~! SUPERINTENDENT OF OOCUHENJS TH( SUPPL lrRS J, ~AYN~ SYLV~STC" 1.A.T. £NGINCCRING CORP. Tf I HATERJALS-INJ•L., INC. T AYLOR-OUtJN TAYLOR INSTRUHENTS TROJAN OATT[RllS ·~uCK & AUTO surp~y, INC. u.s. RENHLS '21630!00 . -·. _$:$~6..7Q s5R6.lf O Ut186.89 __ l?.1~81),QO .. no6 i6n. oo $208.81t .n~,s6Q!1?.. ,7.60 $l3•77't.70 -~~ Q't. 92 u,121.a1 $298.55 s.3,653!~1 $21.32 S11618.62 Sl8.35 -··147;00 Slt2JO.OO t:3l?f>.94 $116.25 S157•'t3 $/t08!~6 S27.8't $260.28 ~357"16 $26'1•00 OESCR I PTI ON PIPE SUPPLIES DEKURRAGE REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND TELEPHONE TRUCK PA~TS ENGINE PARTS 1979-80 AUD IT ENGINE PARTS CONTRACTOR P2-2~~1 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DRILL & TEST 11-13-2 rQ$TA~~-HETfft_sueeLIES INDUSTRIAL WASTE SA"PLING ICE CONTRACTOR 2-21 TRUCK REPAIRS LEGA~ ADVERTl$1NG P2-23-6, P2-25 GEAR BOX REPAIRS QfflH. $YPrl-J~$ SAFETY GLASSES ENGR. 5-12-2 LU PR I CANT PA I NT SUPPLIES 3-21-1 REPAIRS ····-HHIH'i 11-:13-i CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 PLUMBING SUPPLIES POWER WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL ~~AR Q!H< rARTS . PUMP REPAIRS BOTTLED WATER HEU. noel{ OFFICE SUPPLIES SOLVENTS fL~CTRIC.HQTO& rABT~ PUBLICATIONS TOOLS P~TTY CASH RglHPM8SEH~HT PUMP RENTAL PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK P/\RT~ CONTROLS TRUCK BATTERIES TRUC~ PAfHS EQUIP.HEtfT, RENTAL ( I, i. J . . :; :J> FUND NO I . q)~9 -~· pJSl uo~~I~~ CAP.JAL PROCESSING DATE 10/0j/bO PA~( REPORT NUMOER AP~3 .. .J::' :; 'j I )> G') rn •. :=-a :J>· t-t -I rn 3 ==!t: 00 I :A> .--.-- t::1 ........ (/.) --1 :;c ~ n --1 (/.) :; :i> I .J::' :; IJARRANT 1110. 051992 051993 05l99't 051995 05J9'Jf. 051991 051998 051999 (l52PPO 052001 052002 Q52003 05200/t ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANG[ COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/Q0/80 VCNUOf< UN1T£0 PARCEL S£RV1CE UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO•t INC. V~R st1tNTlfl~ . VALLEY CJTJCS SUPPLY CO. JOHN R. MAPL[S ~~lrR P9~LMTION.CQNJ~Ql. f~P~RATIQff WAUKESHA ENGINE £ERVICENTER V(~T[RN ~HOLCSALE co. ~HJfEt f1N£ ~ V~RVILL[ THOMAS L. WOODRUFF XEROX CORP. G~~m Gf .. Y ~RDtPL~~~9JI Hf~ ZIP TEMPORARY PFRSONNCL lOTAL CLAIMS PAID J0/08/80 SUMMARY 12 OPER FUND 12 f /R 'FUND- 13 OPER FUND 13 f /R FUND #5 OPER FUND //5 ACO FUND #5 f /R FUND 116 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND # 11 OPER FUND #11 ACO FUND 115&6 OPER FUND 115£6 SUSPENSE FUND #6&7 OPER FUND . JT. OPER FUND CORF SELF-FUNDED WORKERS 1 COHr. JT. WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 10/08/80 FUND AHOUNT $15.38 s.-\23.25 ~1,n1.11 $~31.29 $225·50 ~90!()0 SI 1078.88 1H.68 '2,58fJ!OQ suo.oo 131'130.'\0 $350.14 .... i~4 t ~60 ·1213001337.'J't ---------------------------------- AMOUNT $ 51.37 ··-226,146·.50 lt,]ltl.11 125,893.00 ··-3 t 865. 05 4,716.60 68,508.27 .. ·-....... 15. 30 5,459.2U 2~479.94 ·s.221t. 11 . 47. 97 7. 4 77. 58 . 2,037.12 173,496.45 1,631,325.42 ··1,66ts.84· 37,583.1t3 $2,300,337.94 OESCRIPllON DELIVERY SERVICE COHrRESSOR PARTS LAB SUPPL I ES PIPE SUPPLlES ODOR CONSULTING CONfE~EHCE REGl$.TRATIDN ENGINE PARTS GENERATOR PARTS l.EGA~ SERVICE$ CONFERENCE EXPENSES XEROX REPRODUCTION (;All~~~ TEHPORARY ttELP It I I i: ~ ·'. . ,\ I I I· ( .,, I ~ to I t-a :::: ::t> G> 1'"11 :z t:j :&> .......... -I_ .,., 3 :::.t:: 00 J> .-.- t::j .......... (/') -j ~ .......... ("""') -j (/) :::: tX1 I ~ :: ( FUNO NO YlY~ -Jl OIST YORKIN~ CAf·lTAL P~OC£SSJNG DATE 10/21/HO ~AG[ PE~ORT ~UMAEV APqj -~OUNTY 'SANITAllON OJSTRICTS OF ORANG£ COUNTY CLAJHS PAID 10/22/~0 WARR/INT NO. Vf.NGOR . -·. AHOUNT .. -. . •. OESCR I PTI ON os:>olb ~OVANCC £L£CTRlCAL SAL£S, l~C. l~1.8A ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 05;>01£, AOVANC[O [L[CTRONICS . . t.o\O.Of. ... PAGER REPAIRS 052fi17 AH(RJCAN CYANAMIC COtWAfl:Y U6,:>16.'11 CHEtUCALS Of,?(llU t.HrHICAN SCJrNtJFlr f'fWl>UfTS s.150.73 LAB SUPPLIES O~?Cll'l AHCRICAN SOCIETY 'FOR.HICROBIOLOGY -· -.. --. "J90·.oo . --· ... -TECHNICAL JOURtfALS 052020 /.N(;t< UI s I NOUSTll I t.l UAl<DUAR E no. Olf TOOLS 052021 ANIXTER PPU/AN Sl86e1~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (' ll52on JOllN A·.--·ARTUKOVICH ·g SotJS• lNC -. .. ....... f.21\9,311.58 ·---·. ----CONTRACTOR ·11-·13-2;·EHERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS ASSOCIAJfO Of LOS ~NGllf$ $lt025.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES r.~2023 05,·0?'I AUTO Sl•OI· (UUJM-![NT er.. :a,6Ao.52 HYDRAULIC JACK -· 052G2!> 05202l {1~2027 DACKfTf.\l PRf V[NTJ ON-·orv J CE"... .. ... _.. ·-·--·--· -·-·---····-·-u-t"J6"9 0 o----·--·--·---eACKtTOW DEVI' CE-'TESHNG .... 0A~K Of 4M£PICA NT & SA Sl10"5.27 VARIOUS TRAVEL EXPENSES OAHNfS & D[LANfY l761.08 GEAR PARTS 05?(l2fi o5cO?" . Of[RLY' .. & ·~ssocuTEs.-INC~"-·-··-·-· ...... ·--·----·. ·----· ··$qOO.oo ..... _ .. _.WORKERS' 'COMP; ADMINISTRATOR OLUC OIAMONO H~TERIALS ~lf7.82 ASPHALT SUPPLIES (15.::·03b ~OYLC [NGINlERlNG CORP i9,l61.00 SURVEY 3-22-2 AND 3-22-3 ·052031- 05203:> lSROl1AffT9-· H~C. -·· -·-----·-· _ ... _____ ·····-.. ·---.. ····--·. -·------n1•·13-----· . _ .. _·-·off ICE. SUPPLfEs·-.. C t R llfCONDJTIONJNG CO. $390.00 PUMP REPAIRS 0520.53 CS COMPANY t659.72 PUMP PARTS 05;>03't CAL JFOPN I A . p ~tlrl-'l -vrurrP. ··--·· ... ·-. ·-·. . -. -. --· --···. ·n·e .76. ---..... ---·-PANEL ING'-. 0!'.~0~!:. CALJFOHNIA SPHOUTING CO. $5.50 PERHIT OVERPAYHENT REFUND 0520~(: CALOLyMJC GLOVE & SAFrtv l346·3~ SAFETY SUPPLIES 052037 ART CARR"lfU'NStfTSSfON" .• ·-·-· -... -... _ ... --·-. ··-· -··--u-00·,70-··--·-.. ·---TRUCK-REPA'IRs--·-··--.. -·-----·-.... - 0~;>030 CARRIER CLEARING SCRVICf Sl6.~5 FREIGHT 0 5~ 03'J C.lt[VRON u.s.A., INC. t.5,086.00 ENGINE OIL 052!l'lD il5201t 1 "lL LIA,.,. N. er AICK r--·---. ------... ···-·-..... -" . -·-----··--·, l 95. 2s-··· .. ---. ---yp:c·f-. E'XPENSE s-__ ,. . -. --~--. -· COAST CHEMICAL f104.98 LAB CHEHICALS ~~·2lllti' 05;>04j 05;>C'tlf COLL CG[ lU,.HlCR CO.• I NC• $8 7 • 't5 LUMBER . rllHHLR ce--sTAT I OtsERs -A·tJo-r" l'NTERS' CORP; ----·---··---·--$82• :sr--· ·------oFn CE ... S'UPPL"I Es--·--·--------·---·_ ... ------- CONSOL JO AT Eb ElECT~lCAL Ol~T. $681.3~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0!120't5 . O~:»O'H> CONSOLJOAlED REPROOUCTIO~S S689e65 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CMJTlNfNTAL.CHEKICAL' co.,_ .... ·--··· -· . ·-·. -. -i211;301-.·n .. ·--------.. -·-cHLORTNE'-··----· .. ···---··----·--· ........ --.. 0 520"7 0520H CONVfRS[-~ARO-DAVlS-OlXON,JNC• !2,-054.00 TESTING P2-2~-l to51A Y£SA AUTO PARTS, JNC. iA8•&3 TRUCK PARTS Ii 5~ l!lt ~ cnsr11 ~ES~ UATSUN ...... ·----·-----··-·----·-· '6-J-.97" ··--·-··-·-··TROC'K-'PARTs·-· ·---... ·-·-----·-·- 0!)2fJ5n 052U51 P52C!5r-· (15?0'.l:a. !)~,;>l•t't MK. CRAN[ $lt593.00 CRAN~ RENTAL TO~ OAUf S $205.tt' WPCF EXPENSES Ort 1r. r.ONSTRUCTlON .. CO-., .. JNr• .... -·-----·-·· -SltOCJt ... oo--·. -... ···--··HANHOlE .. COVElf""REPAll\S·-:.;-DISTRICT 113 ouru1 SYST(tts. INC. U57·50 KINI-COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES OElP.A l'USJtJfSS HACUINfS '40.00 TYPEWRITER REPAIRS O~?O!>fl 0!>?.05f. f\52957 ni;2oef! 052u5c; our1N ruw~nos conr·--·---·-· -...... · ·-·-··--·-· ·-·· -· .. ·--··· t6,•19--· --· ..... __ PA'INT··suPPUES---.. -·-··-·--·----·-· · (CO AJ~ PROUUCTS $92~31 ELECTRICAL SU~PLIES E.fJ.A.1.&1.,· INC. :f·'ft517.UO EIR -BIG CANYON f ,, s T fol u~ t l N c • . . .. .... _ .. -..... _ .. ·-.. --· -. ... ·-. -... -..... -·-. .. . -.. 15 ') 5 ; ] ~ . --. . . .. ··-· ...... -0 FF I er-supp ['I E s ....... __ .. ---· - rLfCTKlC EEL Hf G. co., l~C. i308.5~ CABLES £J5;>06[. f l~CHf~ ! PO~Tfh co. i1so.2R PIPE SUPPLIES ., :: t:d I N :: l> ::J> ,, ~ :::s ]:> .. _ ....... -I .,, ::s: ~ X> t> :::1 --t /) H :0 -4 I ..... I) ::: j ) :: fl•tW 1'110 UAR R /11\: T I'~ 0 • 0!>20f) O!:>?Of.2 O~?C6~ £15206,. 0520&~· 0520n6 052061 "05:?060 U52(J(.4 o5207f, l!!>2071 (152072 (1!>2073 0520H C\52075 052£17£. 052017 fJ5~1 07fS 05ii07'' Cl5r'Ol!C (t b::' Olt J 05201\~ 0!»21JP.j 05:-'0Vt r1s:>rau5 O~;">(lflf 052087 1152oc~ n C!5?0U&J 05211'.lQ c• t>t' o·n 0~·2f'l92 C0520'U o!':;onlf l'5209!i l)f:20% 052097 os~n~o 05~·(Jr,~J 05~ l OG Ob2101 osno2 052103 o5noq o~n C!) 052106 'l)l)CI -JT lilSl l.ICRl'.Jt.I[, CAPITAL PHOC(SSJNG OATf 101211eo l'Al~l RlPORT NurorP Af ~3 COUNTY ~ANJTAllON UJSTNICTS OF ORANGE COUNlY CLAIHS PAID 10122180 -·· V l Nl>UH ·· ··· · AHOUNT. (ll~SCHll'1 ION· .. f LO-SY~TEHS tlD6.05 IHPELLER PARTS FLYING llGFflS LIN(S S.30'l.7CJ . FREIGHT f OOTHILL Ff(~ co. $5'19.10 HOWER PARTS CLJFFO~b A. Fo~~ERT S3t~81.50 SURVEY P2-23-6. 5-22 tomnArn "VALL'CY CA~lr.·A·----·-·-.. .... ·····. ······-·--·-U13"iU3 ·• .. flLH PROCESSING EDUARD R· fkANCIS ia~.oo ~HPLOYEE MILEAGE fR[fa.1Ay ttACtllNf & \l[LOJNG $166.95 WELDING SUPPL,ES ·cf lV -of fULURTON . . .. . -. . $')1.0lH ..... ··-.... WATER USEAGE" . ·-·-··· GAIN(S tL£CTPIC SUPPLY co. \168.53 WIRE SUPPLIES G[U(~Al £L£CTRIC co. $11611.60 BLOWER SHAFT REPAIRS Grr~t:RAl u:u:a-HON"C--co-··· ·-·-----·· -···---·------·--... ·-··---·n·,23·"···12·· -----·--TELEPHONE .. ti-Cl HJSlRUfHNT CCiHPANY UO't.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES trAAK(R lOUJl'MfNT co. U99.98 TOOLS tlACU Ctl[HICAl ·co. -·-···-·-· ---·· .. --··. ·-·-·· ····-·· ···-f.265952" "LAB SUPPLIES G[Ol<G( T. HAU co. f.52.65 'CONTROLS tUUL-AUAY COUAINlf(S 1.385.00 TRASH DISPOS~L HrRTZ"fAP-1.:CASIN'G 01vr·s10,..,.--:··· -·-----·--····-·--·----$6,91'1•"05'• -·-··-·--· AUro··•L£ASlNG"" -· ·--· .. HOLLYMOOD Tlk£ Of O~ANGF SR0.75 TRUCK TIRES HON[YUELL• INC. Sl43.18 STRIP CHARTS 'HOm:f'""Cf HATTER1rs-. ··---······ ..... ·-·· ··---.. ··--···---·--·· .. ·--·-uo·9-~3· . . ......... BATTERIES .. . ~OUARO SUPPLY co. t266.89 PIPE SUPPLIES R.S. HLGH[S co., INC. $66.13 SHALL HARDWARE 2 -ttuNf•L[T tOHPAlllYi" · urc··--·-·... . ... --·-. ----·--·· .. ----· $0~--o~ . ··--. -·-·---ELECTfU"CAL" SUPPa:ns--· -··--··· ··-. -. CJTr Of ttUNTINGJON fi[ACH \9.6~ WATER USEAGE INLAND £»PIPf fGUIPHfNT co. $100.20 TRUCK PARTS "1NSTRUt'fNJ'SOCH'TY ·or··AHER.JCA .. ·--··--··-···· ·····-··-·t26e"OO . -· .. --···-suBSCRIPTIONs-. ·-. ·--····--··· INTCH[X CORP. t33.83 LAB SUPPLIES fNTr«NATIONAl fOILS COkP. '99.0~ LAB SUPPLIES · rnvrnc ·nANC"lt MA·HR··o1STfUCT ··-. -·· --·····-··-···· -··· -· ""$39·20 .. ··---.. WATER" USEAGE .... -··---·-········-·-···· K~MAN f[AklNGS g SUPPLY $)55.82 DEARIN~ SUPPLIES KEITH 8 ASSOCl~l[S $6,168.00 SURVEY 11-13-2 KftCo ·sAL£S & rNGINrr-~rnG en.--··-·· ·····-·-·-·-·-·$);.581.-·13--··· -···· ·-· COHPRESSOR'"PARTs-···-·--··-·--·· ·-· -·· Klf\iG HEAi<JNGt 1Nr.. s.'t,725.CJl BEARING SUPPLIES KNOX 11\:l>USTRIAL SUl·PLJES $513.20 TOOLS L. rs. u; .. s;. • I NC. · --·-.... ····· ·-·· . · · · ---· ·. -··--· · ·--· ---·-·· i5q-.·79· --···-·· · --·wnD I NG-·surPnEs··--··-·····-· .. LA~HY'S ~LOG. ~AJ[PJALs, •~r. S~B3.1P BUILDING HATERIALS LOC4l AG£~CY FORMATION COMM $125.UO rROCES~ING FEE A~NEXATION #43 LO'S ANGEL( s· ·cttrH J cAt···co.-. ....... ....... . .. . -.... .. ·-····· ·-· \"?fl>7n·· 01 . ------·-·--·c·Au·sT i c-· SODA ..... ·--··· ---·--···-··-·· . LO~«t & ASSOCIATES S3,595.90 ENGINEERING 2-5-2 A •• a. LYNCH CO. f 575 • 7 2 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES HACK lhUCKS, Ifft·;.·· · · ·-·· ·-· ·· ·· --·· ··· · -·· · ·-·· .•..... 'Sfi'J•26. ·---··--··-·ft RE. EXTl'NGUIStJER. OCNN1S KAY $1?..00 EMPLOYEE ~ILEAGE MCCALLA OROS. ~UHP K ORILLJNG 1~62.11 PUMP PARTS. Mc MAliA w·cf SIC Of. COST A . Mf SA'-· • . . . .. ---· -.. ..... . ...... , 3')6 •'14· -·. -·. ··-· Of FI CE"'fURN ITURE .• ··-·-· .... . HCttA~TlR-CARR ~UPPL~ co. $1~6.78 SHA~~ HARDWARE KJTCll(ll IUNUAl s, INC. ·····-'-~~-~-".~ ······ ... -·! nc_~~ICA.L JOURNAL (~ ( -·· ::: b:t I ~ ::: :-?> G"> rn ·~ t-3 ~'> ......... -c rn :·:s: ~ :)() ]> :::J ..... '/) -I :0 ...... I -I n ::: lj ,.,. ::: { ( FUNO NO 914Y -JT PlSl ~Ok~IN~ C-fJTAL Pl~OCESS1Nf: Of1lE 10/2)/fHl rAGE RfP~Rl NUMBER AP'f3 j 'COLJN'TV S/aNJTATION MSTRlCTS OF ORMJGr·r,oUl\iTY. ,··· -·· CLll~S PAIO 10122/ttO IJARR.'\NT ~o. V£Nll01\. .. AMOUNT ···-. . -nrscr 1 PTT ON -- 052107 NAT10NAL LUH~[k SUPPLY S3fi9.09 SHALL HARDWARE 05:.>100 NATIOtJAL HCUNJCAL INFORMATION t27.00 PUBLICATIONS ll!>.210'1 NO~UCO pROouc1s $33-10 TRUCK PARTS 052110 OR,NG[ COUNlY AUTC PAHTS CO. t~05.09 TRUCK PARTS (1 5:?111 ORANC£ "TOOL HAf!T. . • . ····· .... -· .. .. . . . .. 1184.19" ... ··-· .... "HEIGHT ... osn l? a~vG£N S[HYIC[ i92.52 SPECIALTY GASES 05C:l l 3 COUNTY SANITATION OJST~JCT Of ORANGE COUNTY f9D0.57 REPLENISH WORKERS' COHP. fUND 05211 q R. o. FARMAN. ·-· ... . . . ... . .... n10.u· -· -··-····EHPLOYfE Hl°LEAGE"···· --.. ···· .. 05~1 H' PAP TS UNL IHI J[f1 U65. H TRUCK PARTS 05?1 lf. P(£hSo~s LA~NHO~fR C[NTf~ i336·50 HOWER ENGINE ... 0~2117 .. P£AJ, f'ARli!ICt<t" .. HITCttELL" r·rn. ········-·-·-.. -··--····-·--i11;'300•oo-·-··----··-···ANNUAL.AUDIT f'5211A PfRGAMON PkCSS, JNC• $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION 05;:> 11 'J 0~212() PION(£* CONSULTANTS i~S3.50 TESTING 11-13-2 POl.LARt•s· VULCl.NIZING ~fRVJCr-·· . . .... ··-·. -······ ·---$256900 .. PIPE REPAIRS (.f2121 POSTNASlfR tt,000.00 POSTAGE 05212? tlAi{Ol.fl PRl~l\OSl lCf $2't.OO INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAHPLING ICE '052123 RAHIE!O!.f OlSPOSAl:' .. CO;-··-·---·-·. ····-···· --·-. ··-····-·--··· ·---···n2o;oo-·-·· ··-·-·-·· "TRASH. DI SPOS'AL. -..... . 0~2J2't {152125 RICttAno RANDALL i10.20 EHPLOYEE HILEAGE Ttl( U£6JSTEP .int3.DO CLASS If IED ADVERTISING Cl52JU: Rrll£f PRINTING r.o;···· .. -·· ·-· ····----·---·--... ··-· "77•'1l'-·------·"-BUSINESS"CARDS" 0~2127 05212A R[YNOLU ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. i676.8't ALUHINUM SUPPLIES. RtfUJf t.Jf~. INC. !751•92 POWER FAN · C5212'J SANTA" ANA "OOOGC"' .. ··-···-····· ·--····. --·-. -•.. ·-····•"• -···--.. ----,n···o.,-·-·· -·--···--··TRU.CK .. PARTS. ·-·· ··-·-~··· (•52130 CITY Of SEAL P.EACll U5tl.50 WATER USEAGE 0~2131 05;']3?. 05n33 SHALLCI• & LOHR, JNC. s.7t310.00 ENGR. 6-8. ENGR. 5-12-~, SURVEY 5-21-2 St1At1R0CK"SUPfLY ___ . ..... . .. ·-· ----... -·---···-.. n't:?.97 ··----·-·TOOLS --...... Sftf PliAf<U MACttfN[tlY CO. H 11t690.92 TRUCi< PARTS o~.21;)11 StlffCUJN Will IAMS l7R3.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 05213e. t.521.Sf, 0~2137 csn :rn C:5~·Dll SLAOD[t\ -E'NG 1 NEER J NG··-· -.. .•.. ...... . .. -. ··--·-·· ---··-.. --... -··-····i9ao.-oo· ··-·--·-·-· TE'ST rNG--2~r· -··-··---· -. --·-·-··-.. ... . . SHJlU-fHF~Y co. 1.560.00 TESTING 11-13-2 sH11tt-MA~RY Co. S731.40 PUHP PARTS so. COAST./!.tR"OUAUTy··HANAGEHENT.DISTRICT" ····-·-·· tlSO•OO ··-·-··--·--·sETTLEMENT"OF-·su1r··-·-· SOUTH OHANG[ SUPflV t2t.65 PLUHBING SUPPLIES f! 5;~ l't (J SOUllt(f\N f.ALJF. EOISON CO• s.1371895.0l POWER r5~1't l (l~21'12 052llf3 0521 'flt so• CAL• GAS Co.-· ·-·-•··. ... . . -·• ·-· · -$2 ;n·1 .. 31.. ··-··-····-NATURAL-GAS -. · ········ -·-·-· so. CAllf. lfSTJNr. LAB i257.57 TESTING P2-2)-6 SPAHKlf.lJS llf<JHKHJG \lltTlR 1526.q'l BOTTLED· 'WATER STAROIJ srrn· -.. ........ . .. ··-·... . . .. . ..·-·-· ........ -·i7'>R•07' ...... -··--···sTEEL .. STOCK-·-····--.. -·-.. ---··-··· 0~~1'•~· Tttf SUPPLICl<S U1'f'tl.6l ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0~2lH J. ~AY~E SYLVfSTfP i6A7.12 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEHENT 0521/H 0521'tU o521'fq 0521~C: TA Yl OH I ~s TRUHrtlTS . ···-· . --. ·--. . -..... -··--s2 8T .1 n ·-··-·-·-... --. HECTR"I CAL '"S.UPPL t.E s --·-·--··-. T~NytS LOC~ ~ SAff S£RVIC( i142•8't LOCK & KEY SETS TRANSAMERICA OllAYAlt lNC. $7,767.32 ENGINE TESTl"G & REPAIRS lRllVfl CIJffS ... ·-· ... ····· -. .... . .. -·····--····-·· ·-·-n~...ao· ····-·--··-·····-·vARIOUs··AIKTARn··--· ·-· ~52151 05~·15~ TROJl.N U/ITTU<IES .f.603.46 TRUCK BATTERIES lRUCK ! AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 143J.l~ TRUCK PARTS I• • I. I ::; td. I ~ fU~JO fJO ::: ):> G') 1"11 .. ,... t5 :r:a· .L +:-i. ni .. -;ill .. ·..::. :.i:t:: '?" I• :I> r- ~ b 1--t (/) -I ::o 1--t n -I (/) IJllRHllNl NO. (152153 Q5'15't 0~21!>~ 05~'15f. U52H·1 · f!f.21!\A C5('15S 0~216(i t\52H 1 {"15~ 16:~ '(!!)?)£,~-· 052tfJ't Y 1'~ Y -J T fl l S l U 0 IU< I NL C M· IT AL PI' 0 f. t: $ f. I N 6 fJ A Tf l 0 / 2 11 tHl r• A f. J Rf POR! NU"OC~ AP~3 crurqy SAtillATJ(ll'J IJISTRICTS Of OP.t.NCC COUfl!T\' ···• Vf. Nl!OR ···· .. J.6. TUfk[~ & SON• INC. UNION OIL CO. OF C~LJf. UNllfO PARCfl SCHVlCE UNlHO STAHS CfWIPMENT Co., INC. VI.Ill SC JlNTlfl C ·· · -·-· ··-··• .. -·· - CLAlf.S PAID 10/22/80 ···AMOUNT· · ······ -orsckJPTION f2q3.~0 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES · St•l.11 -GASOLINE. -. ·······--·--- $15·36 DELIVERY SERVICE ~122.HO COMPRESSOR PARTS u .-7n9.;95 .. LAB SUPPL I ES . 4 CAHL wARH[N & CO. 1~~0.00 SELF-INSURANCE LIABILITY CLAIHS ADMINISTRATOR UAU~[ShA [NGfNf SEPVIC(Nf[R UC ~T JN GtlOlJSE Elf r Tl? IC CORP fHJ SS ELL IJ 0 l D TliOf-IAS L. ~OO[IRUff i~oo.01 ENGINE PARTS 53t98t.'JO --ELECTRICAL .. SUPPLIES. ___ .. ,. ..... -·-.. tl~l.OO EMPLOYEE MILEAGE S~t72H.OO LEGAL SERVICES Xfrrox·-·coRP;·-··· ·--···-·· -····-···-···. ···-·--···---········-··-·-·$·2·,'197;'10-··-···· ·----~···XEROX .. REPRODUCHON- ZIP T£HPORAH~ PfRSONNrL TOTAL CLAIMS PAI~ 10/P2/80 SUHHARY . ···--·--.. -··- 12 OPER FUND 62 F/R FUND 13 OPER. FUND 13 F/R FUND 15 OPER FUND #5 ACO "FUND ......... -····· ··-·· ·----···--· .. 15 f /R FUND 116 ACO FUND t552.00 TEMPORARY HELP $6521501.CJn ---------------------------------- AMOUNT $ 5.05s.~1 lt,71t6.88 -, · · · · · n . 190: 98 9,361.00 1,lt88.22 ···-···· .. -----,.. 5 ,., : ao· . ·······-··-· -·····---. -·--··------··------............ _. ··-··--··-. --. -.... . s,399.50 230.00 17 OPER. FUND. -. --· -···· -..... --.. -·· ·-·-. ·---··-.• ·~ .. 3 3 ; 1 0 -··· ....... -.. ·--··-. --------·-·--·-·· --.. -···-··. ----·. --· . . . .... . 17 F/R FUND /111 OPER FUND S.50 3,999.32 IJ 11 Aco· FUND .. -··-······ ···-··-· ·-······ .. ·-·····-~---·-·-··206·~187:61t""···· --·-····------······ ------------·· 15&6 OPER FUND #5&6 SUSPENSE FUND JT". OPE R f UND -... -........ ------. - 2.7,3lt5.35 1'373. 00 .... ··-. ·22·0·; 683·: 92. ·-· ·------·--·--------··-·····---···---·· -··-·-·---····· 56,195.82 CORF SELF-FUNDED SELF-FUNDED JT. WORKING LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 727.00 WORKERs 1 ··cottP: "FUND ..... ···-·-···-·-·--·-·····1,800.sr ···-·---··---·----------·····--·········-··-·--·· ··-····-······· CAPITAL FUND 30,760.91 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/22/80 $652,501.98 -,---.. -·. ·-· ·---·· . . . ... ·-·····--·-------·-· -·--·--··---··-~· -....... -. -··-·---·· .. ·-·-·---···-· .. -··-···-.. --·-· ... . ::; td I ..c::-::: ( ( .. J "C" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0.80X8127 t 0844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962·2411 S T A F F R E P 0 R T -~----~--~--- SEDIMENT REMOVAL FROM SANTA ANA RIVER In September of· 1980, the·· Board authorized expenditures not to exceed $62.,..000 for removal of sediment from. the Santa Ana River •. The sediment is to be used for the on-99ing construction program within Plant No. 2. This removal was authorized in order to continue con·struction while. Districts' s.taff negotiated with the County of Orange for additional sediment to be removed under a County contract~. The county opened bids October 20th for' the remov-al of approximately 500, 000 yards of sediment.. The contract provided an option for the contractor to deliver t~e sediment to the Districts or to keep it. If the bid price to keep the matexial was lower than the price to deliver 'it, the. D-istricts had the option to pay the difference and still take delivery. Th~: Boar.d,.· in accordance with authorization, approved up to $200,000 to«make up for this possible difference·. The County plans to award the contract to the second low bidder due to an irregularity in low bidder's docu- ments. The contract, as bid, provides 150,000 yards of material to the Districts at "no cost" (Unit I of the County contract} and the option to accept the additional 350,000 yards at a District cost of appr.oximately $0.60 per yard. Staff recommends that the Districts accept only the 150,000 yards at "no cost" and has informed the County of Orange accordingly. A problem still remains with the County contract. As of this writing, the County has not secured a Section 9 Permit from the Corps of Engineers. Staff understands that the. Corps of Engineers may require that the sediment be placed on the beach instead of · the options of delivering it to the Districts or ownership by the contractor. The County does not know·when or if they will be able to award this contract. AGENDA ITEM #9Cn) -ALL DISTRICTS "C" ~. 0. SOX 3127 -1084* ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALL!Y 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE OROER GRANT NO. N/A ·-·-·--:~~ c. 0. NO. ____ 1 ____ -=::>:-:- ------·--·-------NT~ACiOR·.:.· . Equinox-Malibu ·B :~· LABORATORY BENCH AND FUME HOOD ADOITIONs._ .. AT. J~EC~.AT.IQN .. i>LA.Fr. .NO .• _). _____ ..... __ ------·~---;::;-~ :z;7·.:3 ·--~----· . . _ -Amcunt of 1:lUs Chanqe Order (ADO> om:mracac -$ · 5 , 6 2 4 • O 7 ·-·------------ _:. _ :._. :._· _ In ~ccordaJ?.c~-~ith ccnt:a.ct provisions, the followinq··-cnanqes in -the: contract-·~ _.and/~;" ... =?~'C:ac:c.: wo~ ___ a:e:. here.by authcri::ed and as c:cmpensation:· therefor, the-fallowinq· .. · , adci.;t4-ons to or deductions from the contract price are-hereby approved·.... · · The contractor is directed to lower the floor elevation of ~e gas cylinder storage area and · entry ramp, and modify the enclosure fence in accordance with District instructions for the --~--: l llmp S1.lill. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -= . __ . ~ .. ---_---: NO TIME EXTENSION -----~----·--------. Ori gi na J Contract Pr-ice $ 88, 750. 00 -----------------=---·------·-------Pre v. Aut~. Changes $ 0.00 ------------------This Change (ADO) ~ $ 5,624.07 ----------------==- Amended Contract Priee $ 94,374.07 --------------------.. ~----.....,...-........... , __ -------·---· -·· r-d autho~izaticn date: November 12, 1980 Approved·: EQUJ::NOX-MALIBO ---··-·····-·-··· ,, ________ --~--·-·--·· · ----e-ont rac: or COUNTY SANliATJON OISiRICTS of O~ange County, California .. By .. ----·---··-"-··-"·--·--·----·-· ........ . ________ .................................. ~--~-----===- Chief Engineer "D" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "D" ~•[iL __ S & J CHEVROLET ---'--'------· 18605 Studebaker Road/ P. 0. BoXf S'67l>fi'Or1e.1'tt3f 924~ 16767(71f4/5Z3·;z99-,--· · -· CERRITOS, CA. 90701 ----·-... ---· --·-.. -·- "E" Oct.30, 1980 County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co~ty ·· PO Box 8127 ~-·:. ?C?untain Valley,Calif .. 92708 Atten: Mr. Ted Hoffman Dear Sir: Our bid of 10-28-80 on Specs on #Al03 was inadverteddly incomplete; therefore please reject this bid as per this letter. Thank you. -~--··--····-·-··-S & J CHEVROLET ~ __.. t1 .. ,,,,,,..-, •• : I .,,. ' • ·~ .-I --~. ,< I ~ . ,,.,. -.A ~ .. • _,:" •. c ·} ~(,, ..... ... Le~Anst;~J~--~ ._,, ~ Heavy Duty Truck Salesman LA:dw . ----------.. ·-. ------------~--··-·--...... --... -... -----··- AGENDA .ITEM #9(H)(l) fl.LL DI ST~I CTS "E" November 3, 1980 024 MEMORANDUM TO: J. Wayne Sylvester CouN'TY SANITATION D1srR1ct~ of ORANGE COUNTY, CALJFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.U ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 5"'°·2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Bid Specification A-103, Truck Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner Bids ~ere opened at ll:OO A.M. on October 28, 1980, -for furnishing and delivering one (l) Truck Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner. The bid tabulations are as follows: l. 2. 3. International Harvester Co. Anaheim Southwest Flexible Sewer Equip. co. Whittier Crook Company (I.H.C. Cab & Chassis) Norwalk 3_-A _ Crook Company (Ford Cab & Ch.assisl (Al.ta.mate Bid) 4. s & J Chevrolet cerritos $56,146.05 -56 rl46. OS 61,.686. 70 -61,418.52 27,296.06 The· apparent low bid of $27,296.06 (S & J Chevrolet).·was priced in~ error._ According to the bidder, the price shown includes the· cab & chassis only. We have received a letter from S & J Chevrolet requesting their bid be withdrawn due to the obvious error. ·It _is recommended that the bid from s & J Chevrolet be rejected due · --to· incompleteness. There is a tie from two compani·es for the lowest responsible bid. It is further recommended that the award be made to International Harvester Company for their bid of $56,146.05 _ inpludi_ng sales tax on the basis of their Company location in Orange County., J ,B~te ,.-amo ~ j ~ / $65,000. Ted Hoffman Chief of Procurement & Property W.N. Clarke, Superintendent TH/yh "F" AGENDA ITEM #9(H)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "F" "G" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108-W ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 November 3, 1980 026 MEMORANDUM (714) 962-2411 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester -. ----··-·-·--··---·---····--· -... ..._ SUBJECT: Bid Specification E-110, Trailer Mounted Air Compressor Bids were opened at ll:OO A.M. on October 28, 1980, for furnishing and delivering one tl) Trailer Mounted Air Compressor. The bid tabulations are as follows: 1. Sullair Los Angeles Long Beach 2. Ingersoll-Rand Corp. Pico Rivera 3. Gardner-Denver/Cooper Industries Inc. Whittier 4.-. Mus.tang Equipment Co Whittier $ 9,974.60 10,494.00 11,182.64 11, 221.16 . that the award be made to~sullair Los Angeles of $9,974.60 including sales tax •. $12,000. & Property Concur, vn~ W. N. Clarke, Superintendent TH/yh AG END,~ ITEM #9 < 1 ) -.~LL DISTRICTS "G" "H" RESOLUTION NO. 80-170-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4B A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS· OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4B * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange· County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day ~ubmitted to the Board of Directors by the District's Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to R. M. SKAMNES for SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-48, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Santa Ana River Int~rceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-14-48, be awarded to R. M. Skamties in the total amount of $107,358.12, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are her~by rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980. AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 "H" B I D ~ A B U ~ A T k 0 N S H E E T CONTRACT NO. 2-l4-4B November 4 , 19 8 O 11:00 A.M. PROJECT TITLE SANTA ANA RIVER I~"'TERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE . "._/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------ ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 61,aacr.aa REMARKS BUDGET AMOUNT $ --------- ------------------------------------------------------------ l. 2. CONTBACTOR R. M. Skamnes Tustin, CA Pascal and Ludwig, Inc. Upland, CA Hoagland-Artukovich, A Joint Venture Lonq Beach, CA TO'UL BID $107,358.12 $109,585.00 $119,000.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the Engineer's Estimate was low and that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to R. M. Skamnes of Tustin, California, in the bid amount of $107,358.12 as the lowest and best bid. 1 / (\ cf)&,w,, f.tl.A v~ I concur with the above recommendation to award Contract No. 2-14-4B. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer ~· ~s~ef Engineer II I II AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 II I II II J" RESOLUTION NO. 80-171-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EROSION PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to L. S. HAWLEY CORP. & PAUL HUBBS, A JOINT VENTURE, for SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EROSION PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Santa Ana River Int~rceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR, be awarded to L. S. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, in the total amount of $153,010.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained there~n; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That _all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980. AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 2 II J" S H E E T November 4, 1980 11:00 A.M. CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR PROJECT TITLE SANTA ANA RJ:VER INTERCEPTOR EROSION PROTECTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 198,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------- REMARKS-------------------------------------------------------------- CONTBACTOR TO'mL BID ... J.. L. s. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs IZ'W'indale, CA $153·, 010. 00 2 •. J. w. Mitchell, Inc. Irvine, CA $208,065.00 3. Kordick Construction Irvine, CA ~(p ~,325.00 4.. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Azusa, CA "K" $247,125.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to L. s. Hawley Corp. and Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, of Irwindale, California, in the bid amount of $153,010.00 as the lowest and best bid. ~M~aO~~ I concur with the above recommendation to award Contract No. 2-14-SR. Engineer Deputy Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 2 . "K" "L" RESOLUTION NO. 80-172-2 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-21, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL SURVEYING WORK REQUIRED IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed:appropriate to amend the agreement with Lowry & Associates to provide for additional surveying work required in connection with said project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange Cotmty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 to that certain ~greement_~ated May 9, 1979, ' by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange ColDl.ty and Lowry & Associates, providi~g for additional surveying work required in connection with construction of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That an increase the payment provision for said surveying services is hereby authorized from an amount not to exceed $12,000 to an amotmt not to exceed $16,000 for said work; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said addendum in form approved by the General Cotmsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980. AGENDA ITEM #9(M) -DISTRICT 2 "L" "M" RESOLUTION NO. 80-173-6 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF DOVER DRIVE TRUNK METER VAULT AND CONNECTING SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~ APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF DOVER DRIVE TRUNK METER VAULT AND CONNECTING SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-8 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange Cotmty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Shaller & Lohr, Inc.,· District's e~gineers, for Abandonment of Dover Drive Trtmk Meter Vault and Connecting Sewer, Contract No. 6-8, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and tillle at which. said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980. AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 6 "M" ~:-.. _~_J,,PACIFIC PIPEUNE CONSTRUCTION CO.) "N" PIPELINES • CONDUIT C:ONSTRUC:T10N • UT1LJT1ES C:A&.IP'ORNIA CONTRACTOR'S L.IC:BNSK NO • .&4371 flOST OP'IP1Cl!C BOX 177 .. , IU7Z C:ONSTRUC:TION C:U•c:i.a: S:AST, SUITS: Z IAVINE, CAL.Jl"ORNIA 92714 TIU.EPHONE (714l 591 ·~001 October 27, 1980 County Sanitation Districts · of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Att~ntion: Thomas M. Dawes Subject: Your letter dated October· 21, 1980 Gentlemen: To clarify your referenced letter, our firm did-not authoriz~ repair of RA-30· Subtrunk Sewer and we did not, and do not assume responsibility for damages. We .have contacted our Insurance Carrier and will let them fo~low through with a thorough investigation of -a11 fac~s. Very truly yours, COMPANY > GA:mb cc: Marv Arnold -Pacific Telephone Jay Miller -Bayly, Martin ' Fay City of Irvine -Secretary of Boards AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DIST~ICT 7 "N" "0-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS November 5, 1980 of Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE STAFF REPORT FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 PURCHASE OF A MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADDITIONAL BELT PRESSES (714)540-2910 (714) 962·2411 Staff has evaluated the need for more reliable and less energy consuming dewatering devices. Consideration was given to: l. Age of centrifuges at Plant No. 1. 2. Extension of dewatering facilities at Plant No. 2 with the possibility of concentrating all dewatering activities at Plant No. 2 and phasing out all dewatering activities at Plant No. 1 during the next five years. 3. All dry storage facilities are located at Plant No. 2 along with the sludge transport and trucking support facilities. As a part of the interim sludge dewatering operations, it appears the most feasible measures to be taken at this time are: 1. Replace three or four centrifuges at Plant No. 2 with belt presses of exact model and manufacture as those to be supplied on Contract P2-24-2. 2. Purchase of these three or four belt presses will be at Districts' expense and may or may not be installed by the P2-24-2 contractor, depende·nt upon the competitive prices received for installation. 3. It will be to the advantage of the Districts to negotiate additional belt presses with the same manufacturer in order that a savings' can be realized, because of the ten presses to be supplied to the contractor on P2-24-2. The order would include both those presses pur- chased by the contractor as well as those purchased by the Districts at a unit cost savings. 4. The centrifuges removed from Plant No. 2 will be relocated to Plant No. 1 to increase the reliability of the dewatering activities at Plant No. 1. This will be an interim measure pending final resolution of dewatering activities for both plants. AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" ..... ,._~ .. _"r'W. .~~ ~ ..... " .. -... • r---,- , I I I ' ~ L . _____ J ---~. -----~I--· ____ j '~~;itr:;ri:r~ .:=~ .._ ____________ ___, ---------·-----------··-· COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNfA. ·-· ·-· -.. . . ··---· ----..... ·-····. --· ·-/ _,.._? --------===========~]~I Lt:==== /IL°f-o~r;:~p~~~~~;5-=--· ··· · -o e 11 0-2 11 · AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: A.REA CODE 714' 540-2910 962-2411 P. C. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10944 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO CJFF·RAMP, SAN OIEGC FREEWAY) October 27, 1980 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue. Fountain Val:ley ,. California 92708 Subject: C~r.ti£ication of Negotiated· Fee for Engineering Services in Conjunction with Design of Modification to One MGD JPL Activated Carbon T~eatment System·Pilot Plant In accordance with the Districts'· procedure~. for selection of professional engineering service, the Selection Committee, as authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors pursuant to minute order of October 8, 1980, has negotiated the following fee with· John_ Carollo Engineers for engineering services in conjunction with the Design of Modification to One MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment System Pilot Plant. ·Fixed Fee $47,000.00 Plus actual direct labor costs Plus actual eligible overhead Plus actual direct expenses Plus actual subcontractor costs: Fluor Engineers and Constructors,. Inc. Total above fees not to ·exceed $598,500.00 ' $427,~00..00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fees ·as.reasonable for the services to be performed, and that ·said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Bill Vardoulis, Chairman Selection Committee Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Vice-Chaiz:man Selection Comniittee Approved ----------------------~ "P-1" Fred A. Harper General Manager AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 V (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 November 5, 1980 ST AF F REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH PHASE II JPL ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT SYSTEM PROCESS ·With the Districts continuing effort to find a more efficient method of sludge. disposal, as we11·as developing processes to meet future·effluent.discharge requir~~nts, considerable effort has been devoted to the evaluation of the JPL-ACTS· process. To date the· Districts have done the following in the development of this innovative process. 1973 -The Districts entered into a cooperative effort with.JPL NASA on a trailer ·mounted 10,000 gpd pilot facility. 1975 -Award of $3.5 million grant for the construction.of a 1-MGD pilot plant at Plant No. 2 and evaluati~n·of the process on a plant scale basis • . :19.17. -Publication of report on construction and ·operation .of 1-MGD JPL-ACTS pilot ·facility. Although the process performed as anticipated, there were several mechanical .deficiencies noted to be correcteq prior to · ~e f·inal.iza- tion of acceptable d~sign criteria for subsequent facilities:. i978 -Board authorized. contract with Fluor Engineers and . Constructors in-the amount of $148,760 £or review of all data regarding feasibility of the process. 1980 -Award of contract to Fluor.for $480,000 for grant funded Phase II design of modifications to l~MGD facility. At the ·time of the negotiations with Fluor Engineers and .Constructors, Inc. for the grant funded portion of this· ·Phase II effort, Fluor was not familiar with the EPA requirements contained in all A/E contracts designated as Appendix C-1. Appendix. c-·1 ha:s certain provisions that are not· acceptable t9 Fluor, ..notably the rights and·· remedies clause, corrective action requirements, and consequential damages. An EPA funded contract. cannot be approved without the provisions contained in Appendix C-l. It is the desire of both EPA, and staff to .retain a process engineer with "P-2" AGENDA -ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" "P-3" Staff Report November 5, 1980 Page Two equal competency to Fluor to be involved with a Phase II · effort. It should be noted that the Districts continuing efforts on the JPL-ACTS process have been noted· in the LA/OMA Facilities Plan and EIS. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington has indicated a procedure whereby Fluor can still be involved with the Phase II effort, without imposition of the provisions contained in Appendix C-1. (See attached letter.) The Selection Committee met with representatives from Fluor and John Carollo Engineers to negotiate a cooperative agreement whereby John Carollo Engineers would act as the prime contractor and Fluor as the subcontractor to John Carollo Engineers. John Carollo Engineers was involved in the initial Phase I effort in the design.and construction of the existing 1-MGD facility. In the negotiations· with John Carollo Engineers and Fluor, Fluor stated that since initial negotiations in M~rch of this year, their effort increased from $480,000 to approximately $550,000 due to inflationary increases estimated at a minimum of one percent per month and the March negotiations not including provisions for costs associated with Appendix C-1. However, in view of the arrangement with Fluor as a subcontractor to John Carollo Engineers,. Fluor has revised thei.r efforts to a level of $427, 500 from $550 ,·ooo. The balance of the effort has been assumed by John Carollo Engineers in the amount of $171,000 for a total Task I effort of $598,500. It is recommended that the Boards approve this engineering agreement subject to approval by the State Water Resources Control Board. and certification.of grant,funding. (See attached letter.) AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-3" UNITED STATES ENVIRONMEI .. TAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 .. ~ .. ~ OFFICE OF WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT Mr. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer Orange County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Lewis: This is a response to your letter dated July 17, 1980, in which you requested guidance to resolve the reluctance of your consultant to accept the provisions of Appendix C-1 of 40 CFR, Part 35. Appendix C-1 contains required provisions for all consulting engineering agreements and has been used unifonnly throughout the construction grant program. these provisions were developed to balance the risk and responsibility for the contract work between the grantee and the consultant. A possible resolution of the problem, as we discussed on the telephone with you, would be to have the process consultant assist your design consultant who is presently doing work for you. In this way the Appendix C-1 provisions would be contained in the design consultant agreement and some of these provisions would apply to the work performed under subcontract by the process consultant • . I advise that you contact the State .Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office in ~an Francisco to resolve other specific problems of interpretation that you and your consultant may have .. After reviewing this matter further, if you have any additional questions, please let me know. Sincerely yours, i· v4a1r)) Y) '8 JJ;:)_)J Harold P. Cahill, Jr. . Director Municipal.Construction Div~sion (WH-547) "P-4" AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-4" TATE Of CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR .• Go ... rnor TATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1VISION OF WATER QUALJTY • O. Box 100 • Sacramento 95801 1 16) ' -~ . ~7971 \._) HAR 2 6 1980 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Co\mty Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 _.; Dear Mr. Harper: In Reply Ref er to: 512:ELM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (CSDOC), ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT SYSTEM, PROJECT NO. C-06-1073-01, AMENDMENT TO PLAN OF STUDY APPROVAL On December 24, 1974, this office approved your Plan of Study for treatment and disposal alternatives. Included in the approved plan was a pilot study of the Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACTS). The purpose of the ·pilot study was to determine whether ACTS is a feasible alternative for both wastewater and wastewater solids treatment. Interest was expressed in the system because it appeared that ACTS could be energy efficient and might remove toxic wastes better than conventional secondary treatment. ACTS would a1so convert wastewater solids to an inert ash that could be disposed of in Class II sanitary landfills~ A pilot study of ACTS was conducted through 1977 and a pilot study report was completed in November 1977. The results of the pilot study· indicated that the previously discussed benefits might be'obtainable, but that further work would be necessary to verify these claims. In particular, numerous problems prohibited the cgllection of meaningful results. These problems included the following: 1. Pressure filter feed supply was not uniform or reliable• 2. Filter press average cycle time was low, only one filter was used, and filter cakes were of ten too wet. 3. The sludge drying system was inefficient and unreliable. 4. The sludge reactor was vulnerable to upsets in both upstream and down- • stream facilities and was subjected to frequent heat-up and cool-down cyc1ing (resulting in stress and corrosion failures). In spite of the initial results, the State Water Resources Control Board and EPA continue to believe that ACTS has potential. For this reason, this office has care£ully reviewed ·your request, dated February 26, 1980, to conduct a ~ further evaluation of ACTS, The Division of Water Quality hereby ~pproves the study as described in your request and in this letter (see last paragraph "P-5" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -.. ALL DISTRICTS "P-5" "P-6" Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-HAR 2 e tHO concerning authorization to proceed). The purpose of the study is to determine the operating characteristics and optimum design parameters of ACTS. In addition, the study is intended to answer the following questions: 1. How effective is the system in removing BOD, suspended solids, heavy metals and pathogens from the wastewater? 2, What is the yield of activated carbon? 3. What are the energy requirements and energy output of the system? ·Is ACTS energy self-sufficient? To answer these questions, CSDOC shall modify the system as necessary to ensure that it is capable of operating on a continuous basis, and shall opera·te the facility for a 12-month period. During the modification period, CSDOC shall prepare and submit a detailed scope of work to this of £ice. The scope shall identify the parameters to be monitored during the period of operation and the questions CSDOC expects to be able to answer as a result of the study. The scope of work shall also detail proposed.arrange- ments between the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and CSDOC. The scope of work must be approved by this office before CSDOC begins to operate the ACTS pilot plant. Following the 12-month operation period, CSDOC shall prepare a pi1ot study report discussing the results of the study. The estimated total cost of the study and report is $2.75 million. Please note that this ·estimate does not include the cost or hiring personnel from EPA's Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, since this cost is~ grant-eligible. ' Because EPA is withholding most grant funds until September 1980, this letter is ~ an authorization to proceed with the pilot study. As soon as funds are available, we will notify you in writing to proceed. At that time, we will also establish a schedule for the pilot study. Should you have any questions, please call Betty Meyer of my staf_f at (916) 322-6653. Sincerely, .··.I : ',_: , ~ "' .. ·. '.. J.,. l~---·· Raymond_ Walsh Division Chief Manager -Clean Water Grant Program cc: .Jim Anderson, Executive Officer CRWQClS, Santa Ana Region (8) Fred Leif EPA, Region IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco· CA 94105 AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-6" RESOLUTION NO. 80-169 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE 1-MGD JPL-ACTS PILOT PLANT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE PHASE II MODIFICATIONS AND OPERATION OF THE 1-MGD JPL-ACTS PILOT PLANT * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, on April 9, 1980, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Collllty, California, adopted Resolution No. 80-61, approving agreement with Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. for engineering services re Phase II modification and operation of the 1-MGD JPL-ACTS pilot plant; and, WHEREAS, Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. has declined to execute said agreement because of certain clauses set forth in Appendix "C-1" of the regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency covering Federal grant-f\lllded projects; and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has suggested an alternative method of completing the work by entering into an agreement with the Districts' \ design consultants, John Carollo Engineers, providing for the work to be performed by the process consultant, Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., as a subcontractor; and, WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Co\lllty, California, adopted Resolution No. 80-161, rescinding Resolution No. 80-61 approving agreement with Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. for said Phase II work; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, "Q-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1" WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for Phase II modifications and operation of the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment Systems (ACTS) pilot plant, and providing for Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for said work; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Conunittee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for services re Task 1 of said Phase II work, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Col.lllty, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That· the certain agreement dated _________ by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange Col.lllty and John Carollo Engineers for engineering services in connection with design and preparation of detailed plans and specifications for equipment and construction(Task 1); construction supervision and 'inspection (Task 2); and operation and evaluation of results (Task 3) relative to Phase II modifications and operation of the -1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon \ Treatment System (ACTS) pilot plant, and providing for Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for said work, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for Task 1 engineering services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement on a per diem fee basis, for actual direct labor plus eligible overhead and actual direct expenses, for a total amount not to exceed $598,500.00; and, Section 3. That payment for Tasks 2 and 3 will be negotiated by the Selection CollDllittee at the time the work is required; and, Section 4. That said agreement shall provide that John Carollo Engineers not be authorized to proceed with any work until approval from the State Water Resources Control Board and written assurances. of grant funding are received; and, "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2" i Section 5. That the 'chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Cotmsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980. "Q-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-3" f I ~ . .. ·• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 3127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Paqe l of 9 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-l073-l30 ----"'-···-------------=-==-c. o. NO. 1 -------------------=-CONTRACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMJ:CALS, INC. OATE ·-· -~~9'U~~-~-' --~9~~-_ ---~-_ _ .. _ . _ . . · --.QxYGEN~®_~i(ATION AND. STORAGE FACILITIES , ANO OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 7 5 JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT A'l' PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2.~23.~.2-. . . ···--······-··--·-. ----·-------·---- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (XJi*18 " 8 1 $ 66,893.32 . . ~ a~~or~~e with contract provisions, the following change& in the contract __ .. an~/9r eontr_act ~rk-are hereby authorized and as compensation-therefor,--the following-· --· additions to or deductions from the contract price are her"by approved-.· l. CRC 2-1: Section 54-8 of Detailed· Spec·i:f ications·. Substitute two-speed motors for 8 specified single speed aerator drive motors. Substitute standard 9earbox for vari-speed type qearbox and add 8 _switches, enclosures · and panels. Reason for cba.nqe: Improved reliability, ease of operation and reduced maintenance. No cost chanqe to contract. 2. CRC 2-2: Section 53-7 (i) of Detailed Specifications·. Substitute A:r:malloy coated carbon steel expander sha.£t for specified stainless steel shaft. Reason for chanqe: Stainless steel shaft stress limits are unacceptable to ~pplier. Armalloy coated car.ban· steel is stronqer and has higher corrosion resistance. No cost change to contract. 3. CRC 2-3: Sections 58-2 & 58-3 of Detailed Specifications. Substitute carbon steel for cement lined cast iron in cooling water pipe. Reason for chanqe: Improved cleanliness and elimination of complex pipe supports. No cost change to contract. 4. CRC 2-4: Section 26-7 of Detailed Specifications. Substitute grade 60 reinforcing bar for grade 40. Reason for change: Improved reinforcing. No cost change to contract. "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS $ o.oo a.co o.oo 0.00 "R-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALL:Y, CALIFORNIA 92708 Paqe 2 of 9 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . C-06-1073-130 ·-. ---.... ~· ... ----· C.O. N0.~ __ 1 ________________ _ ---~---... ----·--__ ,,_ ~TRACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE -~uqust 4, __ 1980 _ __ -:--~·-·-oXYG:Elf-~~TION-AND STORAGE FACIUTIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 75 JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2~23~2. __ .. . .. . ........... ---·--··· s. CRC 2•5: orawinq IM02 & IM03. Substitute nine 2" diameter conduit blockouts for 3'6" x 1'6" blockout in utilities tunnel. Reason for chanqe: Improved desiqn. No cost cha.nqe to contract. 6. CRC 2-6: Addendum No. l, Supplement Orawinq No. l. Change to substitute clamp detail shown in APCI Drawinq 7-3322-09.99-0l Rev. B for detail shown in OCSD P2-23-6 Drawing 4S l2A Section E Detail adds anchor bolts and grout pocket-. Detail substitutes 5/8" anchor bolts· for hex bolts, adds 288 expansion anchors and corner angles. Deletes 6" x 6" seat anqle and anchors. Adds 768 hold down clamps. Deletes work by P2-23-6 contractor of· installation of seat angle and anchors, 3/S" plate and embeddinq of nuts in concrete under angle. Adds grout pocket, grout and clamp handling. Reason for chanqe: OCSD P2-23-2 specified clamp detail (Addendum 1 SD-1) was omitted from P2-23-6 bid drawinqs. P2-23-6 contractor had no indication of any clamp hardware installation until receipt of the APCI drawings. Simpler installation and less change for oxygen leakage. No cost change to contract. 7. c.~ 2-7: Section 53 of Detailed Specifications. Credits for equipment changes: Delete one lube oil pump, Substitute standard lube oil and expander. ~ontrol system for specified separate control panel, delete compressor inlet and discharge silencers, substitute standard inhibited admiralty brass intercooler for specified 70/30 CuN, substitute welded carbon steel pipe for specified cast iron in coo.linq water system, and eliminate expansion joints. Reason for chanqe: Improve design, operation and reliability by elimination of unnecessary equipment and substitution of "--' pref erred materiils. Total cost reduction to contract. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS o.oo 0.00 (.25, 000. 00) "R-2" . •,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Paqe 3 of 9 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-130 ------------------~-=-------··--·-----·· ·----c. o. N0. ____ 1 ________________ ~1._,.~L CONTRACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE Au9U~~--~'---~9~0 ____ --··- --_ .. ----ox:y~-GE~TION-AND STORATE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN OI-SSOLOTION FACILITIES FOR 75 JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2...~23:-2_ _ ----·---·-.. .. -·--·---___ ---·--- 8. CRC 2-8: APCI Drawing 7-3335-4001. Weld stud eXtension to cold box ancbor bolts to increase projection to required lenqth. Reason for change: To compensate for construction error by contractor. No cost change to contract. 9. CRC 2-9: Section 53-S(c) of Detailed Specifications. Substitute carbon steel for stainless steel for water side shell of product vaporizer. Reason for change: carbon steel design was determined satisfactory and wordinq of specification could be interpreted as allowinq carbon steel shell. No cost chanqe to contract. 10. CRC 2-11: Section 61-2 of Detailed Specifications. Substitute Plasite for specified epoxy paint system on· aerator covers. Reason for change: Plasite exceeds specification requirements ana is considered by Contractor the only acceptable coating for the application. No cost change to contract. ll. CRC 2-10: Section 53-10 of Detailed Specifi~ations. Provide nine additional analog signals for transmission to computer. Reason for change: Requested by Districts for improved operational capabilities. Additional cost to contract. II R-3" AGENDA ITEM #14 ._ ALL DISTRICTS 0.00 o.oo 0.00 8,625.00 "R-3 11 COUN7Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 4 of 9 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-llO C.O. N0. ____ 1 ________________ _ ~NTRACTOR·~--llR--PROD~CTs-AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE · . Aug~s~ .41...198.0 . · --.. --~--~--:-oXYGEN""·-~'l'ION""AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 75 JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P~-~3~_2 __ ·__ _ ··-···-..... _. ·-- -·----··-··-.. --·-----·- -. 12. CRC 2-12: Section 53-6 (a) (13) of Detailed Specifications. Substitute expansion anchors for anchor bolts to hold· · Crane Denning lube oil pumps. Reason for chanqe: could be located. load. Floor was poured before anchor bolts Expansion anchors are· suitable for No cost change to contract. 13. CRC 2-13: APCI OWq. 7-3335-6223 or Dwg-. IM04. Modify compressor inlet piping to avoid interference with structure constructed by P2-23-6 contractor. Reason for chanqe: Structure was poured before piping was installed. Interference was not noticed during review of drawinqs by Contractor and Districts. No cost change to contract. 14. CRC 2-14: Drawinq IM04. Delete tie down straps on lube oil tanks Reason for change: 'l'his is a plan clarification, not a ~ontract change. No cost cha.~qe to contract. 15. CRC 2-lS: APCI Owg. 7-3322-6202 & 7-3334-6204. Install 12" oxyqen sleeves in Kennison Tunnel to pass through st:ucture constructed by P2-23-6 contractor. Reason for change: Coorclina tion of piping and related work between P2-23-2 and P2-23-6 contracts. No cost chanqe to contract. "R-4" AGENDA ITEtl #14 -ALL DISTRICTS · -·o.oo o.oo o.oo o.oo "R-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GR.ANT NO. Paqe S of 9 c-06-l073-I30 1 . -. ·--· ----···- C.O. NO. ----------------~v CONTRACLOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE --~--~--.~~~~·-~-~· ~~8.Q __ ... --· -·-· -. -.. -·--_ ··onGm·-~lfATI'C)N°AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN OISSOLtJTION FACILITIES FOR 75 J o·a : .. ..MGD IMPR6vEo TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 , JOB NO. P..2..~23_.:..2 ____ ·--·-... --·· ---~· . . .. ---. ·--··--~ 16. CBC 2-lS: Orawinq 2M04 Section o. Tap threads in deck penetration flanqes. Reason for change: P2-23-2 drawinqs 2 M04 Section 0-- showed insufficient information for Contractor to detemine required desiqn durinq the bid. Since it is standard practice for APCI not to embed flanges in concrete, Contractor assumed that a raised flange would be suitable. Adclitional cost to contract. 17. CRC 2-16: . APCI Drawinq 7-3335-6213. Provide and install reducers and flanges to adapt coolinq water drain line in 12 K!l buildinq to mate with lines provided under P2-23-6. Reason for change: Welded cooling water line allowed under ClU:2-7-5 was not compatible with P2-23-6 interface. contractor acknowledges that the oriqinal change was· at Contractor's request and additional costs should have been recoqnized at the tiJDe of Districts' decision. ~:o cost change to contract. 19. CRC 2-17: Sections 67-2000 & 44-24 of Detailed Specifications. Substitute #14 wire for #12 control wire. Reason for change: APCI standard for control wiring. No cost chanqe to contract. 19. CRC 2-18: Sections 58-2 & 58-3 of Detailed Specifica~ions. Substitute standard weiqh:t pipe for under 8" diameter, Schedule 20 for 8-14" diameter for specified Schedule JO .. pipe. Rea.son for chanqe: Contractor's standard specifications were qiven to installation contractor in error. Schedules exceed requirements of application and a.ll applicable ANSI codes. Total cost reduction to contract. "R-5" AGENDA ITEM ·#14 -ALL DISTRICTS 4,403.00 0.00 o.oo (572.68) "R-5" . . ~ . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF.ORANGE COU~TY P. O. SOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708,) Paqe 6 of 9 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-130 ------------------------1 \.,I ·-·--··-··-·-···--·--····-_. ····-----·-... C. 0. NO·----------CONTRACTOR: All. PRODOCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DAT;:: .. .. Auqust 4, 1980 ox!GEN_ G~RAnoN-·AND STORAGE FACILl:TIEs, AND OXYGEN oiSsoLUTiaN-FAai.ITi-Es -Faa-·15 JOB: MGD IMPROVED Tm:ATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-2~.:-:~-- 20. CRC 2-20: Section 53-6 of Detailed Specificati.ons.- Substitute 24% compressor stability for specified 25% stability. Reason for chanqe: Modification to achieve additional l\ would cause additional power consumption with no imp:rovement in performance. No cost chanqe to contract. 2l. PCH 2-3: · Drawinq lSOl. Substitute : 3/811 for * l/8" tolerance in Contractor Specification for vertical alignment of cold box A. Reason for cha.nqe: Tolerance is suitable for· cold box operation. No cost change to contract. 22. PCB 2-5 : Drawing lSOl. Provide LOX tank foundation design for 28% lateral seismic load in lieu of specified 22\. Reason for cbanqe: Improved stability of foundation. Additional cost to contract. 23. PCH 2-7: Section S4-3(b) (3) of Detailed Specifications. Install aerator support structures. Reason for chan9e: P2-23-6 DS4-3 (Jb) contract excluded installation of aerator support structures and anchor bolts. Work must be done by P2-23-2 contractor. Additional cost to contract. "R-6" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS o.oo o.oo J,932.00 56,806.00 "~-6" •. , ~ , COUNTY SANITATiON DISiRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ?. O. BOX 8127 -10844 E'.LIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOKN!A 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. Paqe 7 of 9 C-06-1073-130 -~--··~--····---.. C.O. N0. _____ 1 _______________ 1~~~-L · CONTRACTOR:_ AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE Au~~t 4, 1980 · ----OXYGEN~ ~tliERATfONANo STORAGE FACILZTIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 75 ___ JOB_~----.k!§~.Bm.~J1B-. .:£~NT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO •. E2.~.2.3~2 .. -. -· .... . ·-· .......... -· .... -··-·. 24. PC!i 2-8: Pipinq interference, Pump and Compressor Buildinq Basement. Modify coolinq water pipinq to eliminate interference- wi th pipinq and conduit installed under P2-23-6 contract. Reason for chanqe: Pipe interference was caused when P2-23-6 drain pipinq was installed in wronq location. Conduit locations were never established· - on P2-23-6 drawings. Additional cost to contract. 25. PCH 2-9: Provide aerator support anchor bolts in accordance with Contractor Drawing No. 302356 Rev. B. Reason for change: This item is an approval of the anchor bolt size and type, for use in the construction of the curb as outlined under Item 6 CBC-2-6, Page 2 of 9 of this Change Order. No cost change to contract. 26. PCB 2-10: Section 60-7 of Detailed Specifications. Provide standard APCI lightninq protection detail in lieu of de~il specified. Reason for change: Speci.fied lightning protection detail applies to building structures and cannot be applied to a steel-shelled cold box containing a number of steel and aluminum components. No cost change to contract. 27. PCB 2-12: Add enclosures for Surge Protection and Power Factor Correction capacitors. Provide and install surge protection and capacitors as aqreed in May 30, 1980 meeting. Reason for chanqe: Additional work requested by Districts not included in specifications. Additional cost to contract. "R-7" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DTSTRTr.Ts 2,110.00 o.oo o.oo 9,536.00 , ·,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 8 of 9 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-130 ....... __ -----------------------·-------·------c. 0. NO. 1 ---·-·--------------------------'e-ONTR.ACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE _Auqust 4, 1980 --:------OXYGEN _.GENERATION.AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR JOB: 75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO..! __ P2.~4:~'.92. . -····---·-. 28. AW 2-2: Drawing lSOl. Provide additional excavation of cold box. Reason for chanqe: Extra excavation (overexcavation) required. Specified extra provided in contract specifications. Additio~l~cost to contract. 29. CRC 2-22: Orawinq 7-3335-80040. _Installation of panels in control room. Reason for change: District has revised the layout of the panels in the control room after the floor has been poured. This necessitates core drillinq throuqh the floor. Additional cost to contract. 30. CRC 2-23: Design of Lox Tank Footings by ?A Enqineer. Substitution of Rt:!gistered Structural Engineer from Pennsylvania in lieu of Reqistered Structural Enqineer from california to sign plans submitted by Contractor. Reason for chanqe: Districts Engineer accepted the Registered Engineer from the state of Pennsylvania because equipment and contract drawinqs by the Contractor were prepared in Pennsylvania. Contractor ha.s an on-qoinq workinq relationship with enqineerinq in Pennsylvania who is familiar with t.lle system. No cost change to contract. 31. PCB 2-ll: Added Pipe Support Anchor Bolts Installation of pipe support anchor bolts in Compressor Building. Reason for chan9e: The placement of the anchor "'-11 bolts in the Compressor Building were deleted from both.the P2-23-2 contract as well as the "R-8" AGENDA ITEM #14. -ALL DISTRICTS 2,525.00 1,302.00 o.oo "D-8" •• COUNTY SANiiATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ?. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Paqe 9 of 9 ... CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. c-06-1073-130 ... _____ _ CONTRACTOR:· AIR PROOOC'l'S ANO CHEMICALS, INC. -OXYGEN"-GENERATIONttND STORAGE FACILITIES, C .O. NO. ~ . ~ OA TE ----------~~~-~-1=:...!L _~~~9 ~----·-·······- AND OXYGEN OISSOLOTION FACILITIES FOR J 0 B : 7 5 MGO IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 , JOB NO.J~-~~.3:-:4 ___ . ------·------------------·--·--- ----~------------- 31. {Continued) P2-23-6 contract. It was the intent that these would be installed by change order pending the resolution of the supplier of the cryogenics equipment. Additional cost to contract. ·3,187~00 TO'l'AL ADD: $66,893.32 It is mutually agreed by both parties to this contract·tha.t ·by-the execution of this Change orc:ler No. l that all items contained herein do adeqaa.tely and fairly···adjust the ··contract price as it specifically relates only to Items· Nos. l · through· 31 above; -- It is _mutually agreed that no adjustment in the contract time ··is reqw.red · for Items --- Nos~ 1 through 31 -inclusive of this chanqe order. ~-··---~-~-... ~---~··--;:::_;:;;··--~-~-·~-·~-~·----~---~--~-::;;;;:=================·-=···=··=··=· =-====·=···=»-=·-·=···==~~..:_ Board authorization date: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. By ------------------------~---------··-·-contractor Original Contract Price $ 8,273,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo This Change (ADO) (DeDt:KD) $ 66,893.32 Amended Contract Price $ 8,339,893.32 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By .... ____ .. __ ··- "R-9" AGENDA ITEM #14 -Al I nr~TRTrT~ Chief Engineer 110 n11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGe COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VAL~EY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page l of 2 CH.4,NGE ORDER GRANT N 0 • __ c_-_0_6_-_1_01_3_-_s_i_o ____ ._. --·--· --· -~·· - ~--------· --~9-hn.-~~--~_µ)covich Sons, Inc. & John A. C • 0. NO. ___ 6 __________ _ CONTRACTOR: Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture DATE October 27, 1980 -----------------------------........ ·---·-----·. ·--COAST-TlUJNICS.EWER;· .REACH l & 2, PORTION OF NEWLAblD STREET INTERCEPTOR JOB: SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. ll~l.3-2 -·-----·-·· -~~~~~f this Change O.rder (ADO) >(:Me•~ $ 89,ASS.OO ------------------In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions rrom the contract price are hereby approved. l. Furnish and install 12-inch steel dewatering effluent pipe, Brookhurst Street to Santa Ana River, in lieu of discharging dewaterinq effluent direct to Pacific Ocean (in accordance with California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 79-127). The discharqe line was installed in April of 1980. a.) Equi;iment: b) Materials : (4,183 feet of l2-inch pipe) c) Labor: Subtotal $ 636.00 30,978.00 l,805.00 $33,419.00 2. Install in-line booster pumps in Santa Ana River effluent line to handle hiqher than anticipated dewatering effluent discharges. Work p~formed in Jul.y of 1980. a) Equipment: b) Material/Services: c) La.bor: Subtotal $ 493.00 145.00 1,.227.00 $ l,865.00 3. Install and maintain 6-inch suction pump at meter structure for installation of meter and 4-inch, 8-inch and 10-inch diesel powered suction pumps to allow diversion of dewater- ing effluent flows to Ta~ert Channel at Brookhurst Street, move in-line booster pumps in Santa Ana Rive-r discharge line; provide dai.l.y monitorinq of pumps. work performed in September of 1980. a) Equipment: b) Material/Services c} Labor: Subtotal $ 4,090.00 14,071.00 8,601.00 $2.6, 762. 00 4. Install relief dewateri:nq effluent discharqe line to Coast Trunk Sewer manhole, Station 51+74, as directed by Engineer, to reduce water volume in Santa Ana River discha.%'C]e line and reduce in-line pumping. Work perfo:cmed in September of 1980. a) Equipment: . $ 40.00 b} Materials/Services: l45.00 c) Labor: 214.00 Subtotal $ 399.00 "S-1" .~GEND.~ ITEM #28 DISTRICT 11 $33,419.00 $ 1,865.00 $26,762.00 s 399.00 "S-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. SOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of 2 CHANGE ORDER GR.ANT NO . __ c_-_0_6-_1_0_1_J_-s_1_0_ ....... ----v-· . ___ ~lln---1\!' __ lg-j;Jlk._ovich Sons, Inc. & John A. C.0. N0. _____ 6 ________________ __ CONTRACTOR: Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture DATE --~ ...... _.9_g_'t;c;>l?~.r-~1.1 .l~_~..Q. ______ .. __ .. ---_ --·~·-·coAsT-"TRUNIC' SEWEX;--REACH l & 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTE~TOR JOB: SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. ll~_l_~::--4 ...... -~--· _ .. . S. Power charqes for additional power used for in-line booster pumps: $12,075.00 6. Credit for salvage value of pipe at 5% of purchase price excluding mark-up: 5% x $58,107.90 = $ 2,905.00 7. 10-foot extension of tunnel under the Oranqe County Flood- Control District Talbert Channel, Sta. 34+18.16 to 34+2a:.16, in accordance with specifications and Item 7 of Change Order No. l, for the unit price of $2,189/L.F. 10 feet x $2,189 = $21,890.00 8. Delete 10 feet of 84-inch 1500-D reinforced concrete pipe sewer (Bid Item No. 2) at $405/L.F., Stations 34~18.16 to 34+28.16. lO feet x $405/L.F.=.$ 4,050.00 GRAND TOTAL ~·. :.:-~ -:::; SUMMARY OF CO~CT..TIME $12,075.00 ($ 2,905.00) $21,890.00 ($4,050.00) ~g ,455 .00 _ ~ o~iqJ.nar-contra¢:"t~··oa-ee Origi~al Contract Time O~igin~-Compi~~on Date Time Extension. This c.o. November l, 1979 400 Calendar Days December 4, 1980 10 Calendar Days TOTAL Time Extension Revised·Contract Time· Rev-ised Completion Date 60 Calendar Cays 460 Calendar Oay·s· Fe.bruazy 2,· 1981 Original Contract Pi-ice $ 7,488,964.53 P rev. Auth. Changes $ 238, 095. 09 This Change (ADO) }(a;ow~s a9,455.oa Amended Contra.ct ? r i ce $ 7 I 816 I 514 • 62 aoard authorization date: November 12, 1980 Approved: Deputy Chief Engineer By --------------------------------------con· fi .. act-or _______ ·-·-· -·-· JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. & JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH, JR., A JOINT VENTURE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orarrge-eo-untr; Ca-J-i··forrri a-~····-·--·---··-····-·-·· BY--···----·-·--.. ··--··-···--·-- Chief Engineer A~~~n~ TT~M ~?R -nr~TQTrT 11 II(' I') II Agenda lt~m No. .S. \ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 REVIEW OF PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA Since June of 1976, the Board .of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 have considered various ·alternatives to improve the collection system serving_ the Big Canyon Drainage Area. There are presently three alternatives for improvements and an alternative of "no project". It should be noted that all of the proposed alternatives with the·. exception of ~·no project" alternative will provide capacity for the present as well as the ultimate development of the Big Canyon Drainage Area. Each of the proposed improvement alternatives will provide an·iinproved system with varying degrees of reliability. · Regarding the secondary impacts associated with the construction of each of the improvement alternatives, the air quali.ty· and noise considerations would be about the same. NEW PUMP STATION ALTERNATIVE ~ Capital Cost $1,085,000 Advantages: Disadvantages: This alternative has the minimtim disruption to the environment during the.construction of the improvements. The pump station would be built at the same location as the present ·station. This alternative would not mean any additional right-of-way through the Big Canyon area and it would not impact the ecological reserve. The energy cost to operate this alternative is· estimated at $32, 00-0 per year based on present electrical rates. This alternative is the least. reliable of the three alternatives because of the mechanical equipment used to -.~ Review of Proposed Alternatives Big Canyon Drainage Area Page Two convey the raw sewage. The pump station is susceptible to power outages resulting in raw sewage overflows and other mechanical failures. · There is a substantial annual maintenance cost in· addition to. the mechanical cost for the pump station alternative·. JAMBOREE ROAD GRAVITY TUNNEL -Capital Cost $2-,650,000 Advantages: Disadvantages: This· alte.rnative will not disrupt the ecological reserve. The gravity system is more reliable than.a pump station alternative which relies.upon mechanical equipment. There are no energy costs with this alternative and the yearly maintenance costs are negligible. Extreme high capital cost.and difficult construction a·lternative. A considerable amount of excavation material ··removed from tunnel excavation would have to be transported out of the area. for disposal. Trucks hauling ·excavated material· would disrupt vehicular traf£ic.on Jambore~ Road, San Joaquin Road and MacArthur Boulevard. BACK.BAY TRUNK SEWER -Capital Cost $816,000 · Advantages· : This project has the same reliability a~ the gravity tunnel system in Jamboree Road at a much reduced cost. It has an advantage over the gravity tunnel system in Jamboree Road· because it.is a shallow gravity system and in case of a· catastrophic disaster (earthquake, etc. ) repairs·· can be achieved more expeditiously· and economically. Capital cost for this alternative is the l~ast of .:the three improvement alternatives. • ......... ' Review of Proposed Alternatives Big Canyon Drainage Area Page Three Disadvantages: There is no energy cost associated with this alternative and· annual maintenance costs are negligible. This alternative has··the largest impact on the natural resources in the ecological reserve. Although extensive ~itigation measures have been established, the final e·ffects of the impacts cannot be definitively ascertained. "NO PROJECT" ALTERNATIVE.· -Capital Cost $0 Advantages: Disadvantages:. .The most important aspect of this alternative consideration is that the environment would be in status quo with-no significant impacts other than those experienced today. No capital expenditures would be required but on-going energy and maintenance costs would be sustained. Continued occasional sewage spills in Big Canyon because of unreliable and undersized and outdated sewage pump plant. This "no project" alternative could not provide any capacity for· additional development in the drainage area. An alternate·means of service would have to be investigated as service is required. I \l BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING November 12, 1980 RAY LEWIS·: It is very important that we go through a brief history of the project in order that you can make a deci- sion on the best apparent alternative before you this evening. We have a Jamboree Pump Station which was built in 1958 to, at that time, accommodate the flows generated by Ford Aeroneutronics It is a small pumping station which was planned to be relieved and supplemented in the future. And the 1969 master plan report called for a gravity system in Big Canyon along Back Bay to tie into the Coast Trunk near the dunes area. The Board back in 1976 directed us. to prepare several reports. The documents are here. Environmental Impact Assessments, Negative Declarations, Supplemental Environmental Reports, Plans and Specifications. At one time, our initial alignment was what we'd call the southerly alignment through Big Canyon. That was opposed and a northerly alignment was chosen. At that time a permit was filed with the Coastal Commission, which was approved by the Regional Commission and later denied by the State Commission in 1977. The Districts realized that there was still a deficiency here, that our pumping station was in dire need of doing something with it. · We have only two pumps in there; one pump is running 24. hours a day and the other pump is running somewhere in the neighborhood of four hours a day. So if we -1- lose one pump, there are four hours that we are not pumping and raw sewage has ·been spilled in the immediate vicinity in Big Canyon. Other alternatives were investigated. One was the alternative to improve the existing pmnp station. This would require a wet well, more pumps, a force main·up to the top of the hill and gravity down Jamboree Road to the Coast Trunk adjacent to the Newporter Inn. Another alternative that was investigated was a gravity tunne'i. A gravity tunnel would start at the existing pump station, it would tunnel 4500 feet in .length and come out around the tennis courts at John Wayne Tenn·is Club. At one point it would be about 95 feet in depth. There are impacts, both advantages and disadvantages to the three alternatives. The Board hired EDAW, environmental consultants to bring together all the work done to date, to prepare the Draft EIR ~d the Final EIR which is before you this evening. They went through the series of early impact meetings that were held in accordance with the Woodland Hills decision prior to the drafti~g of the_ Draft EIR. The Draft EIR was presented to you at the October 8, 1980 Board meeting. At that time this Board felt that the gravity Back Bay Sewer alignment was the .best apparent alternative and based on the information at hand the staff filed· an application with the Coastal Commission for th.at preferred· alignment.~ The Board, at that time, indi- cated that if information of substantial nature was presented -2- lose one pump, there are four hours that we are not pumping and raw sewage has been spilled in the innnediate vicinity in Big Canyon. Other alternatives were investigated. One was the alternative to improve the existing pump station. This would require a wet well, more pumps, a force main up to the top of the hill and gravitate down Jamboree Road to the Coast Trunk adjacent to the Newporter Inn. Another alternative that was investigated was a gravity tunnel. A gravity tunnel would. start at the existing pump station, it would tunnel 4500 feet in length and come out around the tennis courts at John Wayne Tennis Club. At one point it would be about 95 feet in depth. There are impacts, "both· advantages and disadvantages"to the three alternatives. The Board hired EDAW, environmental consultants to bring together all the work done to date, to prepare the Draft EIR and the Final EIR which is before you this evening. They went through the series of early impact meetings that were held in accordance with the Woodland Hills decision prior to the drafting of the Draft EIR. The .Draft EIR was presented to you at the October 8, 1980 Board mee~ing. At that time this Board felt that the gravity Back Bay Sewer alignment was ·the best apparent alternative and· based on the information at hand the staff filed an application with the Coastal Commission for that preferred alignment. The Board, at that time, indi- cated that if information of substantial nature was presented -2- between now and finalization of the environmental document it may weigh in their decision to s-elect the best apparent alternative. The Corps of Engineers, it is assumed through the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service als·o commented on some of the . concerns before 1977 regarding the Lightfooted Clapper Rail. They made the .comment 11 we have determined that there is insufficient evidence of potential adverse impacts to the federally listed enda~gered· Lightfooted Clapper Rail in those portions of the project site and within the purview of Section 404 to warrant a Section 7 consultation." We feel that is a significant f·inding of the Corps. There. is also a letter from the City of Newport Beach in support of the gravity sewer. Ther~· is also a lette~· from th~ county of orange, En~ironmental Management Agency, as to their concern regarding air quality and noise. The consultant has responded to these comments and those responses are included ·in the Final EIR. I should mention that on Monday of this week, there was a hearing at the Huntington Beach.City Council before the Regional Coastal Commission., at which time testimony was given and heard by the commissioners. We received from the Regional Commission a favorable vote, 7 votes in favor and 3 abstentions. There was some opposition to the permit issuance which was registered at that time. BILL VARDOULIS, JOINT CHAIRMAN: Any questions to be asked from any of the Directors? -3- JACKIE HEATHER, CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO. 5: Is it appropriate to go through the EIR and pick up some corrections? RAY LEWIS, CHIEF ENGINEER: If you find there are corrections needed, yes. There is the date on there that will be corrected. JACKIE HEATHER: Please take care of that. You have December of 1980 in it. RAY LEWIS: That will be corrected. JACKIE HEATHER: The Coastal Commission staff during the presentation pointed out that the sewer line in the reach between San ~oaquin and the Dunes is on the bayside and the EIR does point out that it is on the landward side but someone has to make· t~is correctior.r, I think with the Coastal Cormnis- sion, should it get appealed. RAY LEWIS: That's correct. I caught that one time and someone was telling me that there is a· bayside and the wa~er side and the bayside is the inland side. Maybe this is some of the confusion. JACKIE HEATHER! No, he showed on the slide to the commissioners that it would be right next to the water and was potentially very damaging, and that's on 3 and 5. I wondered if we have responses to the Irvine Company's letter. I didn't see it there. Maybe the consultants can explain that. RAY LEWIS: Charles, are there cormnents to the Irvine letter? CHARLES PILCHER, EDAW, INC.: My name is Charles -4- \..,I Pilcher. I'm with EDAW, Inc. We responded informally to the Irvine Company but did not include formal responses to the letter. JACKIE HEATHER: It's in our EIR and everything else has responses. CHARLES PILCHER: We responded to their testimony, which was essentially a positive comment. If the connnents raised significant 'is·sues which need to be addressed to clarify a certain issue we can respond. In discussing this with the District's staff, we didn't f~el there were any substantive issues that really needed to be clarified. But we can if you request that of us. ~Y LEWIS: Madam Chairman, I.think you will find . . . · .... in Section 10 there is a Part One, comments received at the public hearing and responses thereto and a Part Two, written conunents received and the responses. Included is the response to Dayne Stiles testimony but not directly to his letter. JACKIE HEATHER: When did we get the Irvine Company letter? Was that a part of the public hearing? RAY LEWIS: Yes, that was. JACKIE HEATHER: But you responded to everything else except for all the points they ran in· their attachment · which seems very strange to me and they raised some~ I think, significant comments. BILL VARDOULIS: Is there a response in there? RAY LEWIS: There is a response in there. -s- -. BILL VARDOULIS: It's in there. JACKIE HEATHER: Well, it just said that basically they support it but here's another something along with it. In their other comments they go through the.offset enhancement activity, the costs, explore a tunnel failure, the Newport Beach general plan and also the inclusion of an updated Fish and Game thing so there are several things in there that could be included. And that's .. not a problem? CHARLES PILCHER: Generally the purpose of responding to the comm~nts is to identify those requiring further clarification on significant adverse impacts. In the letter from the City of Newport Beach there were many facts in support o~ the. p;-oject.. W~ .didn_'t ac.tually ~espond to those. T~e letter was included. If there is something specific that you feel needs to be responded to further., then we can look at it. The tape is inaudible --in response to Chairperson Heather's comments regarding the responses to ·the Irvine Company letter since the. issues raised were not of substance and did not offer any information of substance the consultant did not feel it was necessary to respond to all questions posed. The responses given in Part One of the Final EIR were ·Sufficient to meet the intent.of the law. JACKIE HEA~HER: So, along with that, we don't have to respond to the written comments we received at the Coastal Commission. -6- '.-' CHARLES PILCHER: No. RAY LEWIS: The comment period did expire on November 7. The Coastal Commission hearing was on the 10th. JACKIE HEATHER: Do you see any problems for the District in moving ahead considering the Regional Water Quality Control Board's comments about the NPDES permit and the fact that construction period during the non--rainy season is identified in their letter as April 15th to September 15th and we have one reach in construction November to the middle of December for the Clapper Rail issue? RAY LEWIS: No, we see no problem with them. The NPDES permit is what they have to do for discharge of dewatering water which we are doi~~ on Coast Trunk.and Plant No. 2 so that is no problem. As far as timing. is concerned, they will consent to the conditions set forth by the Coastal Commission. This has been discussed with their staff. JACKIE HEATHER: You know that? Because someone has already responded earlier. Hal Thomas is on the Regional Water .Quality Control Board. (inaudible) RAY LEWIS: We should relate to the Directors. that at the Coastal Commission hearing the approval by the Commissioners incorporated the conditions set forth by the Department of Fish and Game which are basically the same conditions that were imposed three years .ago with some slight modifications.. At that time we had the ~ortherly alignment, \.._,) now we have the southerly alignment. There are some mitigations -7- -. ~ and as to the impacts on the willow trees, the width of the right of way should mitigate that. We feel the conditions are reasonable ·to minimize the impacts to the reserve. That is staff's verbal report. BILL VARDOULIS: Ok. Do we have anything additional from the consultant regarding the Supplemental EIR. CHARLES PILCHER: No. I think Ray summarized it. JACKIE HEATHER: I move we receive and file the written comments which were received after the public hearing on October ·29_, 1980 with regard to this supplemental EIR. Seconded by Riley. Unanimous. BILL VARDOULIS: Any further staff comments regarding the reso~~tion? JACKIE HEATHER: Do we have to incorporate the review of the proposed alternatives Big Canyon Drainage Area? Do we need to read this or put it into the record? RAY.LEWIS: I think ·it should be included with the reference that the record does indicate that the Directors have considered both the advantages and disadvantages of the .alternatives including the "no project". I will briefly outline these. The new pump station the capital cost will be in excess of $1 million, $1,085,000. The advantages are that it has minimum disruption to the enviro·nment. We will be building in an already impacted area. where the existing pump station i·s. We are not in the traffic, '..,/ ·so there will be no impacts to the traffic. These are the -8- .. \wl advantages. The disadvantages are the higher costs, you will be buying energy from this day forward and increased mainten- ance costs. The gravity tunnel sewer tunneling through the San Joaquin rise there. It has also a minimum impact on the reserve. There will also be a very minimal impact as far as vehicular traffic during construction with the exception of the volume of earth that you will have to remove from the tunnel will have to be transported out of the ·area for disposal. It also is the most expensive alterna~ive, $2.65 million •. This alternative would not consume any energy and.be very low in maintenance, if any. The Back Bay sewer alternative that we have discussed, which the application to the Coastal Commission referred to, has the disadvantage of the maximum impact on the environment. It does impact the ecological reserve. There are the mitiga- tions contained in the permit we think to minimize those. It is the least expensive of the three implementation alternatives, and it does not consume any energy. A very, very minimal amount of maintenance cost is associated with it. The last, of course, is the "no project" alternative, everything is at status quo. You do still continue to pay the energy costs. ·lt has .the advantage of zero dollars today, no disruption to the environment outside of what is there now. We would not off er sewer service through this collection system to the undeveloped properties within the drainage area. Other alternative methods of disposal would have to be sought. -9- Those are the three implementation alternatives plus the "no project" alternative that we are considering. BILL VARDOULIS: Move we incorporate this review of proposed alternatives in __ the Big Canyon Drainage area EIR. All those in favor? Opposed? Carried unanimously. JACKIE HEATHER: Motion to approve Resolution 81-74-5 which is the.final .supplemental EIR impact report regarding the sewerage improvements in the Big Canyon Drainage area and certify that said report has been completed in compliance with State-and District guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. Motion seconded to receive, file and approve. JACKIE HEATHER: It is ~s amended. BILL VARDOULIS: Resolution 81-74-5, any discussion? Those in favor? Opposed? Carried unaniinously. HENRY WEDAA, DIRECTOR: I would like to ask some questions, and I would like to wear my Coastal Conunissioner's hat for this question. If this decision of the Coastal Conunission the other day is in fact appealed to the State Commission, does the District provide all the opposition information to Jackie or to someone who could go up and help her fight the appeal. How is that handled.? BILL VARDOULIS: It is a g~od question. JACKIE HEATHER: The District has hired .an attorney, Allan Tebbetts to represent us, and we have the consultant, '...J of course, EDAW. -10- -. HENRY WEDAA: My only concern is that if an appeal is filed, I ·think that we as a District, we as a joint board ought to see that any necessary help is provided District 5 helping_ to get this thing through the .system. Is that what we would normally do in this kind of situation or just what's our procedure? BILL VARDOULIS: I think we would be by offering the services of the consultant and, if necessary, Ray. HENRY WEDAA: I just want to see that if it is appealed that we help to properly defend the issue. vote? JACKIE HEATHER: What was the Coas.tal Commission Seven yes and three abstention. BILL VARDOULIS: No noes. JACKIE HEATHER: Our representative to the State Commission abstained. BILL VARDOULIS :. I expected either . that or a no vote. Did that representative have to-abstain? JACKIE HEATHER: No. He was unhappy about receiving environmental documents that late. BILL VARDOULIS: Ok. Item 32, consideration of approval of best alternative project to sewer the Big Canyon Drainage area. JACKIE HEATHER: I move that the southerly route of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer be the best alternative project to ~ sewer the District. Seconded. -11- -. TOM WOODRUFF, GENERAL COUNSEL: If there are no comments by the Directors and this motion is. to be considered, I would urge ~hat you make certain findings relative to the alternative project and specifically it seems to me that based on the evidence that has been presented to you both verbally and in written form prior to making this motion both at this meeting and at preceding meetings and that includes the .data ·contained in all the environmental assess- ments and environmental report. And I.would recommend that the Board consider at least the following findings in their .decision: First, that you approve the Back Bay gravity sewer line alternative as approved and condition~d by the South Coast Regional Coastal Commission on Monday, November 10th. Secondly, that knowing the changes have been required and incorporated into th~ project, ·most notably by the State Fish and Game and Coastal Commission conditions and that mitigation measures described in the final EIR which avoid and mitigate the significant environmental effects described in the final EIR, .and, Thirdly, that specific economic and other considera- tions including the energy costs, the capital c·os·ts and the greater degree of reliability .for this gravity system as opposed to pumping alternatives make.the project alternatives described in.the final EIR such as the pump station and tunnel not feasible. -12- JACKIE HEATHER: You could also add a health one too. TOM WOODRUFF: Add anything the directors desire. JACKIE HEATHER: Because of the capacity problems of' the "sewer line· and· p·otential ·for overflows and ·the fact that the area has consistently high coliform counts which makes it quarantine shell gathering and water contact sports that ••• BILL VARDOULIS: That sounded good. TOM WOODRUFF: Never lost a case before. I would move to amend those findings as read and the health finding. Did you get that Rita? Not really. It's on the tape. Ok, then Rita's got it. Any other discussion on the findings? All those in favor? All those opposed? Carried unanimously. Will that cover, Tom? TOM WOODRUFF: Yes ••• The motion was to proceed and go forward approving the southerly alignment and go forward .with it based on all the findings ••• Other business for District 5? District 5 adjourned. -13- ; • .J RE: AGENDA ITEM #3l(E) -DISTRICT 5 RESOLUTION NO. 80-174-5 .APPROVING 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RE: SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE AND DISTRICT GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, in early 1976, the Board of Directors received a report by its staff indicating deficiency in the sewerage facilities serving the Big Canyon drainage area, together with a recommendation for a study to determine the possible ways of alleviating ·the deficiencies; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 1976, the Board of Directors received and filed an Environmental Assessment prepared by the Districts' staff concerning a possible Backbay Trunk Sewer (east side); and WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors, by resolution duly adopted, approved a negative declaration pertaining to the preparation of plans and specifications for a Backbay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport Dunes, generally in confonnance with the Districts' 1969 Master Plan Repo~t; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors approved plans and specifications for a Backbay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport Dunes. Plans and specifications were for the construction of addi- tional facilities due to deficiencies in sewerage improvements located in the Big Canyon drainage area; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 1976, a Supplemental Environmental Assessment prepared by the Districts' staff pertaining to the proposed Backbay Trunk Sewer, was received and filed by the Board of Directors with instructions to prepare the necessary Environmental Impact Report relating thereto; and WHEREAS, on November IS, 1978, the Board of Directors approved a Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed alternative facilities including Jamboree Interceptor Sewer and Pump Station; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 1979, the Board of Directors of the District approved the final Environmental .Impact Report regarding the Big Canyon Drainage Area and certified said report as being in.compliance with the State and District guidelines; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 1980, the Board of Directors authorized soli- citing proposals for the preparation of a supplemental Environmental Impact Report needed; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 1980, the District, through its consultant retained to prepare the Supplemental Environmental Report, held an early input meeting consistent with the requirements of law, and invited all persons known to have an interest in this project to participate and comment on the forthcoming preparation of the draft report; and WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980, the Board of Directors of the District received and filed a Draft Environmental tmpact Report regarding Sewerage Improvements for ·the Big Canyon Drainage Area, establishing a comment period to close on November 7, 1980. Copies of said report were presented to the State Clearing House and mailed to all known interested parties; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 1980, the Districts .filed an application to the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission -South Coast Regional Commission for the permit to construct the Backbay Gravity Line Sewer; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1980, the District published in the Orange Coast Daily Pilot, the Notice of Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, said Public Hearing to be held October 29, 1980; and .. WHEREAS, on October 15, 1980, the Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report was posted in four locations along the project route; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 1980, the Districts conducted a Public Hearing to receive commerits on the Draft Environmental Impact Report at which time numerous persons were present and presented testimony relative to the proposed project to the District Board; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 1980, which was established as the last day to receive written comments on· the Draft Environmental Impact Report, whj.ch written. comments have been received by the Clerk of this Board and which -written comments are hereby received and filed and made a part of the record; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 1980, a Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared taking into consideration all comments received, both verbal and written, which final report has been presented to this Board of Directors for their consideration. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does hereby find, determine, and order as follows: l; Each of the recitals set forth above are hereby determined to be findings of this Board and are incorporated herein by reference as those set forth at light hereat and shall be deemed substantive revisions and findings of this resolution. 2. The Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State guide- lines and the Districts' adopted guidelines. 3. The Board has considered all testimony and evidence submitted by interested persons pertaining to this project and has considered each of the WHEREAS, on June 8, 1977, the Districts' Board of Directors approved the revised. plans and specifications for the proposed Backbay Trunk Sewer; and WHEREAS, on July 16., 1977, the Board of Directors received and filed a summary of the project and proposed conditions for completion thereof, pertaining to the Backbay Trunk Sewer; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the Coastal zone and therefore subject to the State Coastal.Act, thereby necessitating approval by the California Regional Coastal Commission; and WHEREAS, upon completion of all environmental assessments, the District submitted an application to the South Coast Regional Commission of · the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, approval of the proposed construe- tion of the gravity flow-line, referred to as the Backbay Trunk Sewer Line; and WHEREAS, the South Coast Regional Coastal Commission approved the line for issuance of a coastal permit, said approval was appealed and sub- sequently denied by the State Coastal Commission on September 21, 1977; and WHEREAS, in early 1978, the Districts' staff had made determinations that the deficiency of the sewerage drainage facilities for the Big Canyon drainage area were of serious and urgent nature and so reported such to the Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 1978, the Board of Directors of the District I received and filed a project report for the Big Canyon drainage area which evaluated in greater detail other alternate methods for sewerage collection for the Big Canyon drainage area than previously considered; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 1978, the Board of Di~ectors received and filed a draft report on alternative facilities for the Big Canyon drainage area; and three alternative projects at length, taking into consideration the relative mitigation measures available to each project, together with the environmental impact created by each alternative project. 4. That adequate mitigation measures have been established to mini- mize the significant environmental effects identified in the -Final Environ- mental Impact Report pertaining to the construction of the Backbay Line. 5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 30253, the project alternative of construction of the Backbay Line is the alternative which provides the greatest minimization of energy consumption. 6. That the Final Environmental Impact Report regarding sewerage Improvements at Big Canyon Drainage Area, dated November 10, 1980, is hereby approved, certified, and the Board hereby determines that it may proceed i1IDllediately to consider the proposed project construction of the Backbay Sewer for approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED at this regular meeting of the Board of Directors on this 12th day of November, 1980. RE: AGENDA ITEM #3l(E) -DISTRICT 5 RESOLUTION NO. 80-174-5 'APPROVING 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONi-.IENTAL IMPACT REPORT RE: SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA AND CERTIFYING TifAT SAID REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE AND DISTRICT GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. * * * * * * * * * * WHERE:.;S, in early 1976, the Board of Directors received a report by its staff indicating deficiencfin the sewerage facilities serving the Big Canyon drainage area, together with a reconunendation for a study to determine the possible ways of alleviating the deficiencies; and l~iEREAS, on June 9, 1976, the Board of Directors received and filed an Environmental Assessment prepared by the Districts' staff concerning a possible Bac~y Trunk Sewer (east side); and WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors, by resolution duly adopted, approved a negative declaration pertaining to the preparation of plans and specifications for a Bacijpay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport Dunes, generally in confonnance with the Districts' /~?~ster Plan Report; and / WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors approved plans and specifications for a Bac~y Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport Dunes. Plans and specifications were for the construction of addi- tional facilities due to deficiencies in sewerage improvements located in the Big Canyon drainage area; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 1976, a Supplemental Environmental Assessment prepared by the Districts• staff pertaining to the proposed Bac~y Trunk Sewer, was received and filed by the Board of Directors with instructions to prepare the necessary Environmental Impact Report relating thereto; and -• WHEREAS, on June 8, 1977, the Districts' Board of Directors approved the revised plans and specifications for the proposed Backbay Trunk Sewer; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 1977, the Board of Directors received and filed a summary of the project and proposed conditions for completion thereof, pertaining to the Backbay Trunk Sewer; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the Coastal zone and therefore subject to the State Coastal Act, thereby ne~essitating approval by the .s~~ Galiforn:H!. Regional Coastal Commission; and WHEREAS, upon completion of all environmental assessments, the District submitted an application to the South Coas~ Regional Commission of the Coastal Zone Conservation Corrunission}l~f the proposed construc- tion of the gravity flow-line, referred to as the Backbay Trunk Sewer Line; and WHEREAS, the South Coast Regional Coastal Commission approved the ~ .~ ~·~.:i, line for issuance of a coastal perrni ~d approval was appealed and ~- sequently denied by the State Coastal Commission on September 21, 1977; and WHEREAS, in early 1978, the Districts' staff had made determinations that the deficienc'/ of the sewerage drainage facilities for the· Big Canyon drainage area were of serious and urgent nature and so reported such to the Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 1978, the Board of Directors of the District I received and filed a project report for the Big Canyon drainage area which evaluated in greater detail other alternate methods for sewerage collection for the Big Canyon drainage area than previously considered; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 1978, the Board of Directo:cs received and filed a draft report on alternative facilities for the Big Canyon drainage area; and ,J. ~- WHEREAS, on November is·, 1978, the Board of Directors approved a Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed alternative facilities including Jamboree Interceptor Sewer and Pump Station; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 1979, the Board of Directors of the District approved the final Environmental _Impact Report regarding the Big Canyon Drainage Area and. certified sai'd' report as being in compliance with the State and District guidelines; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 1980, the Board of Directors authorized soli- citing proposals for the preparation of a supplemental Environmental Impact Report needed; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 1980, the District, through its consultant retained to prepare the Supplemental Environmental Report, held an early input meeting consistent with the requirements of law, and invited all persons known to have an interest in this project to participate and comment on the forthcoming preparation of the draft report; and WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980, the Board of Directors of the District received and filed a Draft Environmental Impact Report regarding Sewerage Improvements for ·the Big Canyon Drainage Area, establishing a comment period to close on November 7, 1980. Copies of said report were presented to the State Clearing House and mailed to all known interested parties; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 19_80, the Districts _filed an application to the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission -South Coast Regional Commission for the permit to construct the Backbay Gravity Line Sewer; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1980, the District published in the Orange Coast Daily Pilot, the Notice of Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, said Public Hearing to be held October 29, 1980; and 3. WHEREAS, on October 15, 1980, the Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report was posted in four locations along the project route; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 1980, the Districts conducted a Public Hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report at which time numerous persons were present and presented testimony relative to the proposed project to the District Board; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 1980, which was established as the last day to receive written comments on· the Draft Environmental Impact Report., ~ ) "---'~ written comments have---been received by the Clerk of this Board and which ·written comments ate hereby received and filed and made a part of the record; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 1980, a Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared taking into consideration all comments received, both verbal and written, which final report has been presented to this Board of Directors for their consideration. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does hereby find, determine, and order as follows: 1. Each of the recitals set forth above are hereby determined to be 'fl~/, findings of this Board and are incorporated herein by reference as tj:l.9-se set lffe-q~ .fol forth at ~ hereat and shall be deemed substanti vef ~visions ELB±tf" 1 • ' gs of this resolution. 2. The Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State guide- lines and the Districts' adopted guidelines. 3. The Board has considered all testimony and evidence submitted by interested persons pertaining to this project and has considered each of the three alternative projects at length, taking into consideration the relative mitigation measures available to each project, together with the environmental impact created by each alternative project. 4. That adequate mitigation measures have been established to mini- mize the significant environmental effects identified in the Final Environ- mental Impact Report pertaining to the construction of the Backbay Line. 5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 30253, the project alternative of construction of the Back~ay Line is the alternative which provides the greatest minimization of energy consumption. 6. .That the Final Environmental Impact Report regarding sewerage PASSED AND ADOPTED at this regular meeting of the Board of Directors on this 12th day of November, 1980. RESOLUTION NO. 80-174-5 APPROVING 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRO~IENTAL IMPACT REPORT RE SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR BIG C~~ON DRAINAGE AREA, AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ·STATE AND DISTRICT GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING 1HE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, in early 1976, the Board of Directors received a report by its staff indicating deficiencies in the sewerage facilities serving the Big Canyon drainage area, together with a recommendation for a study to determine the possible ways of alleviating the deficiencies; and, WHEREAS, on June 9, 1976, the Board of Directors received and filed an Environmental Assessment prepared by the District's staff concerning a possible Back Bay-Trunk Sewer (east side); and, WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors, by resolution duly adopted, approved a negative declaration pertaining to the preparation of plans and specifications for a Back Bay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport Dunes, generally in conformance with the District's 1969 Master Plan Report; and, WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors approved plans and specifications for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport Dunes. Plans and specifications were for the construction of additional facilities due to deficiencies in sewerage improvements located in the Big Canyon drainage area; and, WHEREAS, on November 9, 1976, a Supplemental Environmental Assessment, prepared by the District's staff pertaining to the proposed Back Bay Trunk Sewer, was received and filed by the Board of Directors with instructions to prepare the necessary Environmental Impact Report relating thereto; and, v i WHEREAS, on June 8, 1977, the District's Board of Directors approved the revised.plans arid specifications for the proposed Back Bay Trtmk Sewer; and, WHEREAS, on July 16, 1977, the Board of Directors received and filed a summary of the project and proposed conditions for completion thereof, pertaining to the Back· Bay Trunk Sewer; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the coastal zone and, therefore, subject to the State Coastal Act, thereby necessitating approval by the California Coastal Commission, South Coast Regional Commission; and, WHEREAS, upon completion of all environmental assessments, the District submitted an application to the California Coastal Commission, South Coast Regional Commission, requesting approval of the proposed construction of the gravity-flow line, referred to as the Back Bay Trunk Sewer line; and, WHEREAS, the South Coast Regional Commission approved the gravity line for issuance of a coastal permit. Said approval was appealed and the application was subsequently denied by the State Coastal Commission on September 21, 1977; and, WHEREAS, in early 1978, the District's staff had made determinations that the deficiencies of the sewerage drainage facilities for the Big C~yon drainage area were of serious and urgent nature and so reported such to the Board of Direc~ors; and, WHEREAS, on September 13, 1978, the Board of Directors of the District received and filed a Project Report for the Big Canyon drainage area which evaluated in greater detail other alternate methods for sewerage collection for the Big Canyon drainage area than previously considered; and, WHEREAS,. on November 15, 1978, the Board of Directors received and filed a draft report on alternative ·facilities for the Big Canyon drainage area; and, -2- WHEREAS, on November 15, 1978, the Board of Directors approved a Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed alternative facilities, including Jamboree Interceptor Sewer and Pump Station; and, WHEREAS, on January 23, 1979, the Board of Directors of the District approved the Final Environmental Impact Report regarding the Big Canyon drainage area and certified said report as being in compliance with the State and District guidelines; and," WHE.REAS, on January 15, 1980, the Board of Directors authorized soliciting proposals for the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report needed; and, WHEREAS, on August 5, 1980, the District, through its consultant retained to prepare the Supplemental Environmental Report, held an early input meeting consistent with the requirements of law, and invited all persons known to have an interest in this project to participate and comment on the forthcoming preparation of the draft report; and, WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980, the Board of Directors of the District received and filed a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report regarding Sewerage Improvements for the Big Canyon Drainage Area, establishing a comment period to close on November 7, 1980. Copies of said report were presented to the State Clearinghouse and mailed to all known interested parties; and, WHEREAS, on October 10, 1980, the District filed an application to the California Coastal Commission, South Coast Regional Cornmission, for the permit to construct the Back Bay gravity-line sewer; and, WHEREAS, on October 14, 1980, the.District published in the Orange Coast Daily Pilot, the Notice of Public Hearing on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; said public hearing to be held October 29, l980; and, -3- WHEREAS, on October 15, 1980, the Notice of Completion of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was posted in four locations along the project route; and, WHERE~, on October 29, 1980, the District conducted a Public Hearing to receive connnents on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, at which time numerous persons were present and presented testimony relative to the proposed project to the District's Board; and, WHEREAS, on November 7, 1980, which was established as the last day to receive connnents on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, written comments were received by the Clerk of this Board, which written comments are hereby received and filed and made a part of the record; and, WHEREAS, ·on November 10, 1980, a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was prepared, taking into consideration all comments received, both verbal and writ~en, which final report has been submitted to this Board of Directors for its co~sideration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of CoWlty Sanitation District No. S of Orange CoWlty, California, DOES HEREBY ~IND, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. That each of the recitals set forth above are hereby determined to be findings of this Board and are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth at length hereat and shall be deemed substantive provisions of this resolution; and, .Section 2. That the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, As Amended, the State guidelines.and the District's adopted guidelines; and, Section 3. That the Board has considered all testimony and evidence submitted by interested persons pertaining to this project and has considered '...,_/ each of the three alternative projects at length, taking into consideration the -4- .; , relative mitigation measures available to each project, together with the environmental impact created by each alternative project; and, ""-' Section 4. That adequate mitigation measures have been established to minimize the significant environmental effects.identified in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report pertaining to the construction of the Back Bay line; and, Section 5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 30253, the project alternative of construction of the Back Bay line is the alternative which provides the greatest minimization of energy consumption; and, Section 6. That the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report regard~ng Sewerage Improvements for the Big Canyon Drainage Area, dated November 10', 1980, is hereby approved and certified, and the Board hereby determines that it may proceed immediately to consider the proposed project of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer for approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held November 12, 1980. -5- TOM: X REF : BOARD EIR GU IDELINS Section 15088 Afte r certifiaation of the E I R as as adequate , and when after deliberation, if the District (#5) con c ludes that the Back Bay Gravity alternative is the favored a l ternative and approves that alternative as the ''Project", the Board in making its decision should make the following findings: 1. Approve the Back Bay gravity sewer line al t ern ative (as approved and con d itio n ed bythe Coastal Commission , South Coast Region on 11/10/80) 2. Changes h ave been required a nd incorporated into the project--notably the Fish & Game a nd Coastal Commission conditions , and mitigation measures desc ribed in the F inal EIR --wh ich avoid and mitigate the significant environmental effects described in the Final EIR; and 3.Specific economic and other considerations ,-- e .g. energy costs, capital costs and the possib l e unreliability of pumping alternatives make the project alternatives described in the Final EIR Infeasibl e . • MEMORANDUM November 12, 1980 TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 FROM: DISTRICTS' STAFF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 REGARDING: INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 1-330 CHERRY FASTENERS -TOWNSEND DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC. 1224 E. WARNER AVENUE, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA. The following is a brief sununary taken from the Inspector's Weekly Logs bet~een October 27, and November 10, 1980. 10/27: Began 30-day sample program. Inspection of the plating facility showed no changes or modifica- tions within the plating area. Mr. Woolsey expressed difficulty in having Cadmium-Cyanide solution from the holding tank hauled away. Conunented that, "I (we) may have to have an accidental spill". Suggested direct piping of rinse water to eliminate the wet floor. Reply was, "that would create an undesirable sludge build-up". 10/28: Sample appeared normal. Informed Mr. Woolsey's secretary that all samples would be acidified inside our Laboratory for safety precautions. 10/29: Sample normal. 10/30: Sample normal. 10/31: Bottles at 1830 and 1930 were pink. Mr. Woolsey did not know what it was. He stated, "You can tell people not to dump things, but you can't really control them". MEMORANDUM November 12, 1980 Page 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOR~~~~2708 (714) 540-2910 ---·--. (714) 962-2411 11/01: Partial sample (11 hours) battery malfunction. Explained to Mr. Woolsey that it would be used as an indicator only. 11/02: Sample normal. 11/03: Sample normal, Bottle 0200 dark blue. 11/04: Mr. Woolsey said the blue bottle from the pre- vious day was from an overflow of their nickel- strike tank. Amount lost and concentration unknown. Cadmium-Cyanide solution to be hauled to Class I dump today. Mr. Woolsey stated that he was afraid that his company would exceed the Health Department limit for Cyanide hauling. 11/05: Sample normal. Excavation started at proposed treatment facility. 11/06: All bottles somewhat yellow. Cherry Rivet had a Cadmium-Cyanide spill, approximately 100 .gallons at a concentration of 2 to 2.5 oz./gal. or about 15 pounds of Cadmium. 11/07: Sample normal. 11/08: Battery malfunction -no sample. 11/09: Sample appeared normal; slightly yellow, some reddish sediment. 11/10: Sample normal. Mr. Woolsey is questioning the permit in regards to the calculation of process discharge. Inspection of plating area revealed no changes to operation or design of area. f .• i I. RE: AGENDA ·lTEM .. #3l(c) ~ DISTRICT 5 Written comments ·received since public hearing on October 29th re Draft Supplemental EIR on Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage Area: (1) City of Newport Beach, Planning Department dated November 5, 1980 (2) County of Orange, Environmental Management Agency, dated November 5, 1980 (3) State of California, Office of Planning and Research, dated November 6, 1980 (4) Department of the Army, Los Angeles Corps of Engineers, dated November 7, 1980 -CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH November 5, 1980 County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California Post Office 3ox 8127 Founta i n Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mrs . Hil .:i.ry J. Baker PLANNING DEPARTMENT (.7 14) 640 -21 37 Subject: Draft EIR: Sewerage Improvements Big Canyori Drainage Area Dear Mrs. Baker: The Planning Department of the City of Newport Beach appreciates th i s opportunity to review and comment on the above subject document. The Ci ty of Newport Beach is or may be a Responsible Agency for the proposed project, depending on which alternative is selected and the mitigation measures wh i ch are f inally in- corporated into the project desig n. I f the Ci ty of Newport Beach is or becomes a Responsible Agency for aspects of this project, including its mitigation measures, the City may deem it necessary to require more detai l ed information in accordance with the 11 State EIR Guidelines.11 After a careful examination of the environmental, economic and engineering data contained within the subject document, the Planning Department offers the follow - ing comments : 1 . The s ub ject document is adeq u ate for the proposed project and has been prepared in accordanc e with the California Environme n tal Quality Act (CEQA) a n d 11 The State EIR - Guideline s .11 2 . The City may require the preparat i on of add it ional environ- me n tal documentation as provided for in the 11 State EIR Guidelines 11 i n resp ect to various aspects of the project and mitigation meas ures proposed, if City permits are required . 3 . The Planning Departme n t supports the proposed construction of the southerly alignment of the Back Bay Trunk Gravity Sewer Al ternative. City Ha ll • 3300 Newport Bou levard, Newport Beach , Cal ifo rni a 92663 County Sanitation District No. 5 Page 2 November 5, 1980 4. The public benefits derived from the southerly alignment of the Back Bay Gravity Sewer Alternative outweigh the anticipated adverse impactswhen balanced with said impacts and giving them greater weight. 5. That the mitigation measures present in the Draft EIR should be incorporated into any project approval. 6. That the southerly alignment of the Back Bay Trunk Gravity Sewer Alternative adequately meets the purpose of the project and will provide benefits to the City of Newport Beach by providing adequate sewerage for the City's plan- ned growth and will improve the reliability of the District's facilities. 7. That based upon the information contained within the Environmental Document that the potential for damage from groundshaking with a seismic event can be reduced to insignificance through mitigation measures requiring proper engineering practices. 8. That the removal of vegetation and subsequent disturbance of habitat can be reduced and/or compensated for by replac- ing or providing substitute resources or environments. Further, that this impact must be balanced with the positive public benefits of the project. This impact is of short- term and does not appear to be long-term and permanent in nature. ~- 9. That the potential disruption of Clapper Rail foraging and late nesting activities and disru~tion of migratory bird use and habitat is a short-term impact and not a long-term and permanent impact. Further, that based upon this the impact when balanced with the public benefits of the project should be overridden in accordance with the "State EIR Gui de- li nes. 11 10. That the closure of Back Bay Drive will not be a significant adverse impact on the circulation system of the City of New po rt Beach nor wi 11 it deny access to the State Eco 1 ogi ca 1 Reserve. 11. That the growth and development of the service area as des- cribed in the Draft Environmental Document is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of New- port Beach as expressed within our General Plan and Zoning Regulations. That environmental documentation has been and will be prepared on each project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the "State EIR Guidelines,11 and City Policy. County Sanitation District No. 5 P.·.ge 3 November 5, 1980 If the Planning Department can be of any assistance to you in the review of this document, please feel free to contact us (714) 640-2197. Very truly yours, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director by \w~2 FRED TALARICO Environmental Coordinator FT/kk cc: Newport Beach City Council "'. -,,: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY ADVANCE PLANNING 811 NORTH·BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA (714) 834-4643 November 5, 1980 County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mrs. Hilary J. Baker FILE Subject: DEIR -Sewage Improvements in Big Canyon Drainage Area Dear Mrs. Baker: MURRAY STORM DIRECTOR RICHARD G. MUNSEL ... ASSISTANT DIRECTO R ADVANCE PLANNING MAI L ING ADDRESS: P .O. BO X 4048 SANTA ANA , CA 92702 GSRON68 The Environmental Management Agency has reviewed the subject document and has the following comments to relate: 1. Air Quality The EIR combines the Air Quality Section with the Noise Section. This is not a logical combination and should be changed to reflect two separate environmental issues. Page 4-16, para. 7 -the air q u ality setting should include the existing data on air pollutants from the nearest monitoring station. The setting on page 4-16 does not adequately describe the climate and meteorology of the area. For example, wind patterns in the area should be discussed in order to provide b ackground for subsequently describing any possible odor impacts associated with the project. Page 4-17, para. 1 -the Air Quality Impacts Section should include approximations of pollutants emitted by construction equipment. Require- ments for calculating construction equipment emissions can be found in the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Air Quality Handbook, 1977. 2 . Noise Noise Section fails to address the noise generation capability of any of the proposed alternatives . Of c oncern is the establishment of a new pumping facility that could create noise impacts. This area should be addressed. Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to review this environmental document. Please forward a copy of the Final EIR when it becomes available. MJG:mlt Very truly yours, ~.7:/ee_p_ Kenneth E. Smith, Manager Environmental Analysis Division ~ GOVERNOR·s OFFICE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GOVERNOR November 6, 1980. Hillary Baker Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: SCH# 80100951 SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA Dear Ms. Baker: The Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Department of Fish and Game have commented on your draft environmental impact report. Should you have any questions regarding their concerns or reconunendatipns, please contact the staff whose names and addresses appear on the attached comment letters. Their comments are sununarized below. Regional· Water Quality Control -ao·ard The Regional Water Control Board is concerned that erosion- siltation during the project's construction will negatively impact upper Newport Bay. They recommend that construction during the non-rainy season be considered to help mitigate this impact~ An erosion-siltation control plan must be submitted to the Board. Any dewatering activities require an NPDES permit. Department of Fish and Game The Department believes Alternative 3 would be the least · · .· environmentally damaging. However, if Alternative 1 is selected, the twenty conditions listed in their comment letter must be met. Most of these conditions relate to the construction phase of the~ project. Ini,addition, the District will investigate the cost to stabilize the vehicle pullout areas and will look at existing roadway drainage improvements. Potential short and long-term . impacts upon biotic resources due to project maintenance should be identified and mitigated in the EIR. Finally, the Department strongly recommends that removal of spoil material in Big Canyon be included as part of the project. Any alteration within the high water mark of a streambed will require prior notification of Fish and Game. You may formally respond to the agencies' comments by writing '.._,/ to them (including the State Clearinghouse number on all corres- pondence) • When filing the final EIR, you must include all comments and responses (State EIR Guidelines, Section 15146). State review of your draft EIR will then be complete. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on your draft document. Please contact Sonia Binnendyk at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions. .........~1~ on learinghouse cc: Ken Fellows, DWR. Resources Agency of California Memorandum . / To James W. Burns, Project Coordinator The Resources Agency . Resources Building, 13th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Date: October 23,. 1980 From : California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region 6809 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE ZOO, RIVERSIDE, CA 92506 ( 8-632-4130) Subiect: SCH#80100951 -SEWERAGE .IMPROVEMENTS-BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA, ORANGE COUNTY We have reviewed this Draft EIR for the proposed sewerage system for the Big Canyon Area. Our main concern regarding this project is the potential for adversely impacting upper Newport Bay as a result of erosion-siltation during construction. The EIR should address this issue in detail. An erosion-siltation control plan must be submitted to this office for review prior to any construction activity. One way to mitigate erosion-siltation effects would be to schedule the construction only during the non-rainy season, April 15 through September 15. We reconunend that this alternative be considered. In addition, if there is any likelihood of dewatering during the construc- tion of this project, an NPDES-pennit would be necessary. No discharge of wastes can legally commence until an NPDES pennit has been issued. The processing of such a pennit can take up to 180 days after the NPDES appli- cation has been detennined as complete. Please call if you have any questions. --~ /.. . /-,· ~ \._)~~ .. ., , I.,,< ·-/a Hisam A. Baqai / Staff ~ngineer HAB:db .·'1 /state of California The Resources Agency · .... = Memo·randum From Subiect: 1. Jim Burns, Projects Coordinator Resources Agency 2. Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 Post Q.ffice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Department of Fish and Game Date: November 3 , 19 80 ... •·= --:·-:. : ·· -- -= SCH 80100951 -Sewerage I1nprovements· Big Canyon Drainage Area We have reviewed the draft EIR for the subject doctiment -~that describes three alternative construction projects to resolve the reiiaBility·and capacity · : problems of wastewater collection and transport within -the ·Big Canyo.n drainage system. We have the following comments for your c~~s~de~ation. - We find that the EIR provides a generally adequate~assessment of the potential impacts.to the biotic resources within the project:~rea, particularly ·the Big Canyon region and the Upper Newport Bay Ecological ReserV-e. The natural resources within Big Canyon and Upper New"Port _,Bay contrlii significant · productive and valuable wildlife resources which should ·be --given maximum protection.· In considering project proposals, the Department prefers that the least-environmen~ tally damaging project alternative be selected. In_~~ur.-View, Alternative ·3 - Jamboree Road Tunnel, would be the least da111aging. =-However~ if~Alternative 1 - Back Bay Line is selected, the following condition~ must be met~ .--. 1. The District inspector shall have the authority and shall enforce all requirements of the approved Plans and Specifi- cations. 2. Construction equipment and spoil material shall be C·Onfined to the existing· hard road surface of Back Bay Drive, excepting the Big Canyon section inland from Back Bay Drive and where replacement of additional drain culverts are required. 3. The surveyed route of the project shall be inspected by Fish and Game prior to approval of final engineering plans, The Department of Fish and Game would not object to the southerly route through Big Canyon provided the following conditions are met: A. The construction carridor through Big Canyon shall be no more than 15 feet wide except in areas agreed by the. Department of Fish and Game. B. The sewer line will be constructed as close to the hillside as possible to avoid encroachment on the riparian resource. ;· .. ( ' l. Jim Burns 2. Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 -2 -November 3, 1980 C. The construction right-of-way will be revegetated within the time frame specified in SA of the Department's ~ondi~.­ tions for construction (see below). D. The sediment retention capabilities of the rip;inan ~o~Unity within Big Canyon shall be retained and p-rotected. · · -· E. Adverse impacts to aquatic resources resulting -from routing and emergency maintenance activities will be mitigated by the restoration of these resources to-the co~d.;l..t.ion.~~hich. existed prior· to such activities. Native plant species will. be used. 4. The District shall insure that a qual.±f±ed archaeologist wi11 c~nduct~a library search of historical sites and walk over the surveyed route prior to trenching to determine pre-project excavation needs. 5. The District shall allow archaeologist and pal:eontologist.inspection of core samples obtained during the soil and ..:geologic surveys. --· ------...... ----· 6. The District shall avoid historical sites or:provide assessment andlor adequate salvage time. 7. Project construction shall be between August-l-and. December 15. Construction delays through archaeological or~paleontological inspec~ tions or salvage may extend the deadline by mutual agreement of the District and the Department. __ . __ , _ _ ---.:. ~ ----__ . 8, The District shall construct the project in. segments· •. ·._ A.. Big Canyon shall be constructed and completed'. between August 1 and October 15 including soil stabilization. _ . B. Back Bay Drive from Big Canyon to San Joaquin Hills Road-shall .. have no t:fllle fra111e restriction except during the cont~act period~ C. The reach between San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Dunes is critical. Construction must begin after November 1 and must be. completed by DecembeT 15. D. The reach from Newport Dunes to the entrance of Shellmaker Island shall have no tilne frame restrictions other than the construction period. 9. Th.e District shall provide one connection at Shellmaker Island entrance. 10. The District will provide 111easures to completely offset or replace any damage or losses to terrestrial and/oT 1118.rine ecosystems as a result of District's construction activities as determined by the Department of Fish and Game. ·' 1.. Jim Burns 2. Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 -3 -, November 3, 1980 11. The District shall confonn to City standards in the resurfacing. of Back Bay Drive. · ·· 12. The District shal1 obtain an easement as needed from the Department. 13. A temporary, movable barrier shall be erected at the bayside-edge· -· of the Back Bay Drive pa-vement if the project biologist determines during construction that such a screen is necessary. (The District shall decide the materials of construction of the screen and shall be__ able to erect said scr~en in a reasonable period of time-if ·deter- mined necessary.) 14. Pneumatic equipment shall not be used within that~section of the project extending along Back Bay Drive. 15. The daily construction shall be monitored by a qualified biologist who shall be a representati-ve of Fish and Game. While ·the· _biologist. __ may be a graduate student, only an official of· Fish and-Game-shall have the authority to request the District's inspector to suspend or stop any damaging· activities caused by the Contractor pursuant to contractural authority. The Orange County Sanitation Dis.trict shall reimburse the Department for reasonable costs of said monitoring. ·----... ·--· 16. Back Bay Road may be closed during construction as_ long-as-local access is provided. 17. The District shall not permit any sewer hookups from the San Joaquin Hills Road southerly along Back Bay Drive to the reserve· boundary· that- would affect the bluffs along that section. One connection shall be provided at San Joaquin Hills Road. 18. Sewer pipe shall be ductile cast iron with mechanical joints. 19. Sewer pipe connections shall be at Shellmaker Island and· San· Joaquin----- Hills Road. 20. A pressure system shall be retained as emergency backup-· in the event of system failure for a period of one year from the date of-acceptance of the contract work oy the Sanitation Distric~ No. 5 Board of Directors. In addition to the above, tbe District will investigate the cost to stabilize the vehicle pullout areas and will look at existing roadway drainage improvements to be identified by Fish and Game. The potential shoTt and long-term impacts upon biotic resources within Big Canyon due to project maintenance pTogTams should be identified in the EIR. Should 111aintenance activities be required, specific measures to mitigate impacts to -those resources should be p-rovided, including measures to reestablish native plants removed by such acti'Vities. }' t'l 1 . ~ • Jim Burns 2. O~~e Count:r Sanitation .Dtst'l'f ct No. 5 4 -·--November 3, -i98o-- Big Canyon contains valuable riparian and freshwater enviro~ents :that provide habitat for a wide variety of wildlife and aquatic resources.-.. The resource --- value within this area would be substantially improved if existing fish and wildlife resources are increased beyond that which now exist~. The Department would view the removal of the spoil material in Big Canyon as·a pasfd.ve step· towards increasing biotic resource values within this area and the adjacent Ecological Reserve, and we strongly recommend that this -be ac·complished aa· - par;·~of the project. · --: --~.~ -·· __ -·_. Any· alt~ration within the high water .. ma.rk of any streambed w£lr-recju±re-;notifi--_-:_ --- cation to the Department of Fish and Game pursuant to Sectiorl-~1601 o:f--clie Fish · ·· -· and Game Code. This notification and the subsequent agreement-·must be completed prior to commencement of the streanlbed alteration. . --... -~· ---. --· ---------_.. -. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project, ::.:-If--you have any questions, please contact Mr. Fred A. Worthley, Jr. , Reg~onal Manager of Region 5, at 350 Golden Shore, Long ·Beach, California 90-S02, -·~·el~phone .:. • -~~. _ (213) 590-5113. DirectOT ---------· -. . ·- DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90093 SPLED-E 7 November 1980 Mrs. Hilary J. Baker County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County California Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mrs. Baker: This is in response to a letter from your office dated 9 October 1980 which requested· review and comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for "Sewerage Improvements, Big Canyon Drainage Area." The proposed plan does not conflict with existing or authorized plans of the Corps of Engineers. We have determined that there is insufficient evidence of potential adverse impacts to the federally listed endangered Light-footed Clapper Rail in those portions of the proj.ect site, and within the purview of Section 404, to warrant a Section 7 Consultation. Therefore, the activity is permitted under a Nationwide Permit, provided the action camplies with the management practices contained in the inclosure "Nationwide Permit." In this regard, we also suggest that the text ef section "Federal Involvement," page 3-9 of the DEIR, be amended aecordingly. If you have any questions regarding permit·jurisdiction, etc., please feel free to contact Mr. Forester Einarsen, Environmental Quality Sectian, telephone (213) 688-5405, at your convenience. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this document. Sincerely, 1 Incl As stated Division . ~. NATIONWIDE PERMIT Th~ following is a list of management practices and conditions mentioned 1n Part 323, Section Ji3.4 and 323.4.;..2,. Volume 42, of the Federal Register, dated 19 July 1977. • !_, -:--: a. Conditions required for the discharge of dredged or fill =aterial pJa~ed ,or: . backfill or bedding for utility line crossings. provided there i~ no change in precoristruction bo~tom contours; bank stabilization. provided it.is·less than 500 linhar feet. necessary for erosion prevention 0 limited to.less than an average of 1 cubic yard per foot,·no material placed in ~etlands and no material placed so as to impair surface water flo'1s; minor road crossing fi11s that are part of a crossing of a non- tidal vater body, provided it is culverted or bridged to prevent restric- tion of high no,.,s, less than 200 cubic yards of fill material discharged belCJ\1·the ordinary high Yater mark. discharge into the wetland· adjacent to the \Jaterbody do not extend beyond 100 feet on either side of· .the ordi- nary high Yater mark; fill placed incidental to bridge construction across tidal waters includine coffer dams, abutments, foundation seals. piers and temporary-construction and access fills; and the renair, rehabilitation,' or replacement of any pre~iously authorized currently serviceable fill. or of any currencly serviceable fill discharges prior to the requirements for authorization, provided repairs, rehabilitntion or replacement does not result in deviation from the specifications or purpose of the origi-: nal work. (l) The discharge will tiot be located in the proximity of a public. vater supply intake. (2) The discharge will not occur a areas of ·concentrated shell-.. f isb production. (3) The discharge vill not destroy a threatened-or endangered. species as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critical habitat of such species • ·(4) The discharge lrl.11 not disrupt the movement of those species of .aquatic life indigenous to the va~erbody. (5) The discharge vill consist of s\sitable material free· from toxic pollutants in other than trace quantities. -(6) nie fill created by'the discharge 111111.be properly maintained to prevent erosion and other non-point sources of p_o1lution. (7) The discharge "1'111 not occur in a component of the National Yild and Scenic River System or in a component of a State llild and scenic river system. ' .. _ . ' 'b. Conditions required for the discharge of dredge9 or fill material into: non-tidal rivers, streams and their imooundments ~including adja- ..... _ cent vetlands, located above the headwaters; natural lakes including their adjacent vetlands, that are less than 10 acres in surface area, fed by · a stream above the headwaters; natural lak es, including their adjac·ent wet- lands that are less than 10 acres and are isolated and not part of a stream; and other non-tidal waters of the United States other than isolated lakes larger than 10 acres that are not part of a surf ace tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States. (1) The discharge will not destroy a threatened or endangered species as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critical habitat of such species. (2) "n1e discharge will consist of suitable material free from toxic pollutants in other than trace quantities. (3). The fill created by the discharge -will be properly maintained to prevent erosion and other non-point sources of p~llution. (4) · "nle discharge will not occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River& System or in a component of ~ state v.tld and scenic river sy_;Ste.m. c. These m.anagCI!lent practices should also be followed in addition to the conditions stated in 4 and b above. (1) Discharges of dredRcd or fill material into ~aters of the United States should be avoided or minicized through the use of other pract~cal alternatives. (2) Discharues in spawning are.as during spat·ming seasons should be avoided. (3) Discharges should not restrict or ir.lpede the movement of aquatic species indigenous to the waters or the paesap,e of normal or c~ected high flowc or cause the relocation of the wnters (unless the primary pur- pos~~of the f111 is to impound waters). ~n ~'._; .· ~) If tlre dis~harge create~ an iDpo~dment weter, adverse impacts -on the nquatic systcn caused by the acceler3ted passaee cf water nod/or ~the ~~tr~ion of its flow, should be c.ioimized. LJ ,! ~ • ~". ~ n'&charges in wetlc.nd areas should be avoided. c: (~ Heavy equipment -working in wetlands should be ·placed on mats. (7) Discharrres into breeding and n~sting areas for migratory water- fowl should· be avoided. (8) All temporary fills should be removed in their entirety. If the dischnrge meets the abvve stated conditions and manap,ement prac- tices, an individual permit should not be necessary to satiofy the requirc- m(!l1tS of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Ac~ndments of 1972. 11/12/80 Agenda Item No. 16 -Possible items for consideration following Executive session re personnel matters (a) Consideration of motion approving Memoranda of Understanding with Districts' Administrative/Clerical Employee Unit, Laboratory Employee Unit, and Orange County Employees Association re Operations and Mlintenance Employee Unit, effective November 28, 1980, in accordance with Board approved guidelines for salary and benefit adjustments, provided that the respective units ratify and execute Memoranda of Understanding on or before November 28, 1980, pursuant to the meet-and-confer process presently under way. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-175, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and Terms and Conditions of Employment Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, re changes in salaries and benefits for Administrative/Clerical, Laboratory and Operations and Maintenance Employee Units, effective November 28, 1980, in accordance with Board approved guidelines for salary and benefit adjustments, provided that the respective units ratify and execute Memoranda of Understanding on or before November 28, 1980, pursuant to the meet-and-confer process presently under way. (c) Consideration of motion declaring intent to make Memoranda of Understanding with Supervisory Employee Unit and Engineering/Industrial Waste Employee Unit effective November 28, 1980, provided that the respective units ratify and execute lvemoranda of Understanding on or before December 10, 1980, pursuant to the meet-and-confer process. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS.OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ~ A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., November 12 , 1980, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7: 30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 1 Adj·ournmen t * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 4: 30 p. m., Wednesday, November 26, 1980. The Chairman then declared the meeting so ·adjourned at 8:50 p.m., November 12, 1980. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of November , 1980 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I 19 80 • S-107 ,..,¥-..... we Boards of Directors ation Districts Nos. , 7, and 11 11-12-80 REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN I HAVE ESTABLISHED A SAFETY GUIDANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING AND MONITORING THE DISTRICTS' PERSONNEL SAFETY PROGRAM. BECAUSE OF HIS VAST EXPERIENCE AS A PROFESSIONAL SAFETY ENGINEERJ I HAVE APPOINTED DON FOX TO CHAIR THIS COMMITTEE. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT FROM THIS SAFETY COMMITTEE ON A SEMI-ANNUAL BASIS BEGINNING JUNEJ 1981. REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO, 9-D ON REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SANTA ANA RIVER BY THE COUNTYJ TO BE USED AS GENERAL FILL MATERIAL BY THE DISTRICTS, THIS IS BEING HELD UP PENDING A PERMIT FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERSJ WHICH DOES NOT LOOK TOO FAVORABLE FOR THE COUNTY. A DRAFT FEDERAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE. WILL RECOMMEND WHAT ROLE OCEANS SHOULD PLAY. IN WASTE MANAGEMENT. THE DRAFT REPORT SAYS THAT FOR SEWAGE SLUDGEJ "OCEAN DISPOSAL EITHER BY BARGE OR THROUGH A PIPE SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE A DISPOSAL OPTION UNDER APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS AND WITH ADEQUATE MONITORING SAFEGUARDS IN THOSE AREAS WHERE OUR PRESENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE INDICATES ONLY MINIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL HARM FROM SLUDGE DISPOSAL." A RESEARCH PROJECT OF THIS NATURE IS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE AT THIS TIME. .. . TO DATEJ THE DISTRICTS HAVE RECEIVED $543J616,91 FR OM REFINERS UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S DOMESTIC CRUDE OIL ENTITLEMENTS PROGRAM, THIS PROGRAM IS DUE TO CONTINUE UNTIL OCTOBERJ 1981. OUR ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST WERE $31J318,76. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,1 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26TH, INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: JAMES WARD """"" ~IL I P ANTHOJ!Y ~ARD EDG A°R) VICKI EVANS . . . DISTRICT NO, 1 WILL MEET AT 4:30 P.M.J IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, ~- 10/08/80 ALL DISTRICTS l -"Id-Jg 0 Joint Operating Fund $ 173,496 .45 ~~ Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -1,631,325.42 Agenc~ li c:n No . <£ Joint Working Capital Fund 37,583.43 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 1'668. 84 2,527.57 DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO . 2 226,197.87 9 ,802.35 DISTRICT NO. 3 130,234.11 20,551.98 DISTRICT NO. 5 77,089.92 11 '405. 52 DISTRICT NO. 6 15 .30 230.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 5,459.28 1 '4 38. 60 DISTRICT NO. 11 7,704.65 270,186.96 DISTRICTS NOS . 5 & 6 JOINT 7,525 .55 28,7 18.35 DISTRICTS NOS . 6 & 7 JOINT 2,037. 12 $2,300 ,337.94 $652,501 .98 MEET I NG DATE Nov· 12 ' 1980 DISTRICT 1 T I:"1E 7 : 30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3 ,5 ,6, 7&11 (SALTAREL~l) ••• SHARP •••••• ~ ---- !YAMAMOTO) •••• .tJJtftB;d ••••• ~ --- R I LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY, P •• _.z;._ ---- CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON •• -lttt!!'---- DISTRICT 2 !FRIEDL~ •••••• WEDAA.. •••• ,/" __ -- SEYMOUR •••••• ROTH ••••••• ~ ___ _ WINTERS •••••• :88Rflll8P'r ••• ~ __ _ (GAMBINA •••••• ~ ••••••• ~ (ECKENRODE) •••• HOLT ••••••• ~--- !ODLUM) ••••••• KAWANAM I . . . ~ ---- WI EDER) ••••••• MILLER ••••• ,,,_... .. ~:::: CULVER) ••••••• PERRY •••••• ~ (BEYER) •••••••• SMITH •••••• ~ ---- (HOLLIND~N) •••• STANTON •••• ~ ---- (CORBETT) •••••• .WARB;BL •••• ~ = :::: ~WARD,J) ••••••• YAMAMOTO ••• ~--__ o·ISTRICT 3 COLLl~S) •••••• VAN DYKE ••• ~ ---- ROWAN) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ~ --- HOLL I 1DEN) •••• ADLER •••••• ~ __ __ ROGET •••••••• CORBETT •••• ~ --- PERRY •••••••• CULVER ••••• ~ ---- KIRKPATRICK) •• FINLAYSON •• ~ --- MANO IC) ••••••• FINLEY ••••• ~--__ FOX) •••••••••• i Ol:H •.•••. ..M!!!:.. ___ _ SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO ••••• ~ --__ DAVIS) •••••••• REESE •••••• -lllf!!:_ ___ _ SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH ••••••• ~ ___ _ ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA ••••• ~ ROMAGN I NO) •••• WHEELER •••• _L_ ---- MILLER) ••••••• W l EDER ••••• ~=::::: BORNHOfT) ••••• WINTERS •••• ~ __ _ WARD,,J) ••••••• YAMAMOTO ••• ~ __ _ DISTRICT 5 ~MAURER) { •••••• HEATHER •••• ~ ---- STRAUSS J •••••• COX • • • • • • • --- ANTHONY .1 P) •••• RI LEY • • • • • • ---- 01 STRICT 6 (CRANK).< •••••• HUTCHISON •• ~ ----· (HEATHERJ •••••• PLUMMER· •• ·~ --- (RILEY) ••••••• 0 ANTHONY.1P· • ~ --- DISTRICT 7 BEYER) •••• < ••• SMITH •••••• ~ --- SALTAREU-IJ ···EDGAR······~ ---- HEATHER) •• • • • • HART. • • • • • • ~ ---- WI EDER) •••• ···MILLER····· _,, --- ANTHONY,, A) • • • • VARDOUL IS • • ...x;... --- HANSON) •••• • •• WAHNER. • • • • ~ -- YAMAMOTO) ••••• lCARD .1 J • • • • • _11111!!_ ---- DISTRICT 11 (BAILEY) ••••••• PATTINSON •• ~ --- (MACALLJSTER) •• BAILEY ••••• ~ --- (MILLER) •• • •• • • WI EDER •••• • JtJ!!!.. --- 10/8/80 JOINT BOARDS HOLLHIDEN) ••••• ADLER •••••• ~ -- RILEY) ••••••••• ANTHONY ,P. -~ -- MACALL! STER) ••• BA I LEY ••••• ---- WINTERS) ••••••• HRffll8FT ••• 7-- ROGET) ••••••••• CORBETT •••• ---- STRAUSS l ....... COX ••••••• -~ -- PERRY) ••••••••• CUL VER ••••• ~ -- SAL TA~ELLI) •••• EDGAR •••••• ~ -- ROWANi). • • • • • • • • • EV ANS • • •••• -M!!::.. __ . KIRKPATRICK) ••• FINLAYSON •• ~ __ MAND IC) •••••••• FINLEY ••••• ~ (GAMBINA) •••••• ~ ••••••• -~ -- HEATHER) ••••••• HART •••••• -~ -- MAURER) •••••••• HEATHER •••• ~ --- ECKENRODEl ••••• HOLT •••••• -~ --CRA~Kl ••••••••• HUTCHISON.-~ = FOX)····.· •••• •l8LEB ••••• Jt!!:_ ODLUM) •••••••• KAWANAMI •• ·-W!:.. -- SEITZ}·.· ••••• -LASZLO •••• ·~ = WIEDERi········MILLER ••••• ~ BAILEY •••••••• PATTINSON.·~= CULVER •••••••• PERRY •••••• ~ HEATHER) ••••••• PLUMMER •••• ~ ---- (DAVIS) ••••••••• REESE •••••• ~= (ANTHONY,, P) ••••• RI LEY •••••• ~ _ (SEYMOUR) • • -· • ··ROTH. • • • • • • """' - (SALTARELLI) •••• SHARP •••••• ~ -· BEYER) • ········SMITH.·.... :::;. --HOLLIND~N) ····-STANTON.... -- ZOMMICK ·······SYLVIA ••••• ~ -- COLLINS ·······VAN DYKE·· • .A.!.. -- AHTHONY ,,A)···· ·VARDOULIS • -~ -- HANSON)······· ·WAHNER·····~ ---- !CORBETT) ••••••• ~B ••••• -=--- YAMAMOTO)····· •'1#:'cA8";4 • • • • ·~·-­ FRIED)········ ·WEDAA • • • • • .~ -!ROMAGNJNO)·····WHEELER····~ ---- MILLER)······· ·WIEDER····-~ -- BORNHOFT) • • • • • ·WINTERS • • • ·-'ti!!!:.. -- (WARD,, J) ········YAMAMOTO···~ -- OTHERS HARPER····· -- SYLVESTER··-- LEWIS······-- CLARKE·····- BROWN······--ANDERSON ••• __ BAKER ••••• ·-- CONATSER •• ·-- DAWES ••••• ·-- FATLAND •••• _ YOUNG ••••• ·-- WOODRUFF ••• HOHENER •••• :::= HOWARD·····-- HUNT •••••• ·-- KEITH •••••• _ LYNCH ••••• ·--MARTINSON •• __ STEVENS ••• ·-- MEET I NG DA. ·e Nov· 12 ' 1980 DISTRICT 1 Tii"1E 7 :3 o p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7&11 JOINT BOARDS (SAL TARELt-1) ••• SHARP. • • • • • ~ ----HOLLI NDEN) • • • •• ADLER • • • • • • ~ -- ! YAMAMOTO) ••••• W~ •••• -;r-----RI LEY} ••••••••• ANTHONY ,P. ·---- RILEY}. ••••••• ANTHONY,P •• ~ ----MACALLISTER) ••• BAILEY ••••• ~ -- CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON •• -----WINTERS) •••• •• .BORNllO~T ••• ~ -- ROGET) ••••••••• CORBETT •••• -·---D ! STR l CT 2 STRAUSSl ••••••• cox ••••••.• ~ - !FRIED) WEDAA J PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER ••••• ~ ----. 5...... . ..... ~ ----SALTA~ELLI) •••• EDGAR •••••• _v_ -- SEYMOUR •••••• ROTH.·.····~ ----!ROWAN). EVANS v · wINTERs> •••••• seRNiroFr.. • -:r ----KIRKP1Arriici<J:: :FINLAvsoN: :z = (GAMBINA) ······Per..·· .... -----NDlC) FINLEY ""' (ECKENRODE) •••• HOLT ••••••• ~ __ _ MA • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ -- !ODLUM) ••••••• KAWANAMI... v' __ __ (GAMBINA) • • • • • • -~· • • • • ·--:::;r -- WI EDER~ Ml LLER -:T HEATHER) •• • •• • .HART ••••••• • • • • • • • • •••• -·-----MAURER) ••••••• -HEATHER •••• --:;---CULVE~ ·······PERRY·····. ~v · ECKEN~ODEl. ·.·-HOLT······· """7" -- BEYER).······ .SMITH.····· 19-fr-_ ~( RA~K HUTCHISON ----(HOLL I NDEN) •••• ST ANTON • • • • ~ '->?Jj o C • • • • • • • • • • • ~ -- (CORBETT) WAR'iITB: v ' -FOX • • • • • • • • • • .1-St:ES'7. • • • ·~ -- (WARD.,J).:::::: YAMAMOTO::: ---:7 --~ ODLUM) ••••••• -KAWANAMI •• -~ -- . ------~ SE nzl ........ -LASZLO • • • • • .,/ ri·ISTRICT 3 IEDER~ •••••••• MILLER ••••• ---::;--= BAILEY l ........ PATTINSOr~ •• _L _ (COLLHIS) •••••• VAN DYKE ••• _f2:::_ __ __ ~CULVER J ••••••. PERRY •••••• ~ _ RO\'lAN) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ...L. _ -(HEATHE)R ••••••• PLUMMER •••• ~ __ HOLLINDEN) •••• ADLER •••••• _._.1_ ----DAVIS ••••••••• REESE ••••• -~ __ ROGET) •••••••• CORBETT •••• -L.. ---(ANTHONY 1 P) ••••• RI LEY ••.•••• ..L._ -- PERRY) •••••••• CULVER.····_:!__ ---(SEYMOUR) •• ... ···ROTH •••••• __ .,...,_ -- KIRKPATRICK) •• FINLAYSON •• _..;_ ---(SALTARELLI) •••• SHARP •••••• --=::.._ --. MANt>IC) ••••••• FINLEY····· _v_ ----BEYER) •••••••• -SMITH ••••• ·-"".---FOX)··········~·····~ ----HOLLINDlN) ·····STANTON···-~ -- SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO·····~ ----ZOMMICK •••••• ·SYLVIA..... a_,.. -- DAVIS). •••• • •• REESE.·····+ ----COLLINS •••••• ·VAN DYKE···---- SEYMOUR) •• ••• .ROTH.······~ ----ANTHONY ,A) •••• ·VARDOULlS • -~ - ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA.···· ------HANSON) ••••••• ·WAHNER ••••• ~ - ! ROMAGN)INO).. • ·=HEEDE~~~~· • -7-----!CORBETT) ••••••• W~ ••••• -:::--- MILLER • • • • • • • I · · · -. ----YAMAMOTO) ••••• ·WARf>,J.' •• ·-·-- BORNHOFT) ••••• WINTERS.···~ ---FRIED) •••••••• ·WEDAA· •••• ·-"""-- WARD.1 J) • · • · • · ·YAMAMOTO· • • ------!ROMAGN I NO) • • • • ·WHEELER • • • • -L. -- Ml LLER) ········WIEDER·····~ --0 ISTRI CT 5 BORNHOFT) ••••• ·WINTERS ••••. -- ! ) J (WARD,J) ···•·•··YAMAMOTO···.::::::... -. -MAURER < •••••• HEATHER •••• --r----- STRAUSS J •••••• COX ••••• ~. ---- ANTHONY I p) •••• RI LEY •••••• _:L_ ---OTHERS DISTRICT 6 //.~'/ e "Ti~ibt'N'~ HARPER. • • • • _.:!__ ( K) HUTCHISON ./ l llf, ... ·r SYLVESTER·· ~ CRAN • ( • • • • • • • • -----1 ft1 """"' I LEW IS• • • • • • _v_ (HEATHERJ ••• ···PLUMMER· • • • _:!._ ---~ tJ I. , CLARKE ••••• -4- (RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY .1 P • • ~ ----o-"' ~ev BROWN v u-...;·· I ..... ·-- DISTRICT 7 \/ BEYER) •••• t ••• SMITH •••••• -.;---- SALTAREL.LI J ···EDGAR······ -r---- HEATHER) • • • • • ·HART· • • • • • • ~ ---- WI EDER) ••• ••• -MILLER·····~ --- ANTHONY .,A) •••• VARDOULIS· ·~ ------ HANSON) ••••••• WAHNER· • • • • -V------ YAMAMOTO)···· • WARD,J • • • • • ------ DISTRICT ll ! BAILEY) ••••••• PATTINSON.· ~ ---- MACALLJSTER) •• BAILEY~~··~ ---- MILLER) •• • ••• -WIEDERW-'-. • ------ 10/8/80 \1 Q' fJ.r, ANDERSON ••• ~ ~·L· ~ BAKER •••••• ~ a II f1 )Lv CONATSER •• ·+ 'hr DAWES ••••• ·-- !. e_ 1(;~ r" ,p FA TLAND •••• ---V-yVW~ · cJ f YOUNG •••••• _ Pr+r PR1e~ j t'rn m A~f,n: WOODRUFF ••• ~ HOHENER •••• ~ HOWARD····· v HUNT ••••••• \7"" KEITH ••••• ·-- LYNCH ••••• ·-- MARTINSON •• __ STEVENS ••• ·-- 11/12/80 JOINT MTG . NOTES (7-a) Report of the Joint Chairman See attached report . Joint Chairman Vardoulis then referred to the trip to Washin g ton, D .C . that Mr . Harpe r and Don Fox took wh e n they found out about the · domestic crude oil e ntitlements program . During that time some picture s we re taken with vario us Congressmen . He then p res e nted three fra me d p ictures to Do n Fox o f he and Biz Joh nson , Do n Clausen and . "'u.-.t.. > ,. Vardoulis also announced that Director Smith was planning on atte n d ing the CASA meeting in Monterey but finds he can 't make it now , so asked other Directors if anyone was interested in using his room reserva tion . There were no comments at that time . (7 -b) Report of the General Manager FAH reported that one of our sludge trucks did the unforgiveable and spil l ed his load. The staff is still l ooking into the report . Hope that it isn 't going to happen again. Also advised that we are going to be involved in an EPA 1990 strategy meetings . The first will be in Washington , D .C . next week . Will have some of the new administration transition team the re . Will give the Directors the results of these meetings . He then commented regarding recen t toxic concerns over hazardo u s wastes being dumped. Advised that Ray Lewis and Ray Young had put together a presentation on where we stand in that area of toxic materials . Ray Lewis then narrated a slide presentation showing various industries which discharge to the Districts and some of their facilities for pretreatment. He also covered the progress we have made on each of several heavy metals in meeting the discharge requirements we mu st comply with. Wieder asked if the County and State Health Department were working with the Districts in doing anything as far as testing the three unclassified l andfills in Orange County? REL answered that they were not in use and we weren't doing any testing in them. He added that there are no Class II sites in Orange County . She then asked if there is any potential health hazards on those areas that are identified in slides as Class I that are not i n use . REL stated we are not working with County and don 't know what health hazards there are. (9-f) Report of the General Counsel TLW referred to the claim received re fly and odor problem. Was filed on behalf of 76 families . Can 't take a c l aim that adds up to this ~ might too lightly but originates back when Districts had a sludge pile in back . We we re aware of problem at the time and dealt with property own e rs. Said the nature of the business here does cause the possibility o f bad odors . What this really is is a n e ighborhood p e tition . .....,, Tom sa i d he wa s r e c ommendi n g th a t t hi s be summar ily deni ed . Added tha t a n y invest i ga tion tha t we n eed to d o h a s al ready b e e n d one . Didn't think it wo uld de v elop i nto any thing f u r ther. I f so , woul d r e vi ew it wi t h t he Bo ard a t tha t t ime . (9) CONS E NT CALEN DAR it ems removed fo r discussion . (h) Roth s tat e d th at we s h o ul d p oss i bly r e ject a ll bids a n d take the next bid . TLW exp l a ined that th is b id had two prob l ems. The b id t hat came in from S & J Chevrolet simp l y forgot t o . b id t h e eq u ipmen t . Wo ul d b e un fai r t o a llow hi m to c omp l e t e t he bid . Was n o doub t in anyo n e 's mind tha t they simp l y o v er l ook ed the eq u ipment . The s e cond part of th is r e l ated t o t he bids tha t came in iden tica l. Sa i d t h ey exa mined t hem c arefu l ly t o determine if t her e was a n y collusion but the s ta ff wa s c o n v inced t h a t t h ere wa s no t. Th e spec was writte n f or a speci f ic t ype vehicle and eq ui pment. Th e equi pme nt man u fac ture r r e ali zed h e had to acquire a tru ck and got a pr ic e from the truck d e aler , and the truck d e aler got a price o n the e quipme nt part from the ma nufa cturer. Ne ither one s a w f it to cut the ir o wn item . Brought them both in and h a d a me e ting. Told the m fr ankly . we wer e a little bit nervous and mi g ht have to rej e ct the m. They we r e v ery c and i d and s a id it was just a f luk e . Th e y a g r e ed they would not o bj e ct if we cho se International Harveste r as they a r e from Ora n ge Co u nty and the other o ne is from LA . Roth the n said h e h a d just wa nte d the sta f f's opinion on this. It was moved, s e cond ed and carried. (o), (p)&(q) Ya mamoto aske d if this was the way we usually h a ndled this . We p ay th e money and then try to g et it back . FAH said y es, a s this was an emergency situation. We hav e to get it r e paire d and the contract or working for the telephone company doesn't have the e x pertise to do the work . Said he thought Pacific Telephone is a responsible company. (28) DISTRICT 11 -C.O. TO 11-1 3-2 Pattinson questioned why this wasn 't figured into the original cont r act . REL advised that when plans were origina ted, Sta te Parks felt we co u ld go across State parks . Started to initiate this at city beaches and State Beaches denied access to State beache s . Have to go al l t h e way down to Couldn 't these costs ahead of time . Change order is due to changed cond i tions . Was not caused by contractor . Was on a cost+ basis . -2- (31-a) Staff Report re Supplemental EIR for Big Canyon Drainage Area Ray Lewis indicated that because this was a critical issue, he would review the alternatives again . Explained that northerly alignment had been chosen at one time but was opposed so have now chosen southerly alignment. Briefly_r ~vi ~we_g. the three al !e...f~ativ_§:.§..-and the proc~d~~es followedl5s'the staff and the Board with regard to tne Supplemental EIR .. Said Draft EIR was presented to the Board on-Octobe r 8th and the Board, at that time, f e lt that the gravity sewer alignme nt was the best alternative . Based on the information at that time, filed an application for a Coastal Cormnission permit for that alignment . Copies of EIR were delivered to State Clearing- house with comment period to close November 7. Ap plication for Coastal Commission permit filed on October 10th and Notice of Public Hearing was published October 14th. Public h e aring held on October 29th and last time to r e ceive cormnents was November 7th . Referred to Final EIR before Directors and indicated that the written comments received were in the back of the EIR . Reviewed some of the comments received . Commented on hearing on Monday at Coastal Commission. Said Regional Commission voted 7 in favor and 3 absten- tions. There was some opposition to the permit issuance which was registered at that time (at Coasta l Conun. hearing) . Heather then asked if it was appropriate to go through EIR and pick up some corrections . Need to correct date of December , 1980 . Coastal Commission staff refers to sewer line on bay side and EIR points out that it is on the landward side . Should make this correction in case we get it appealed . There is bay side and water side and this i s bay side. She also wondered if we had responses to the Irvine Company letter. Didn't see any . Charles Pilcher of EDAW indicated they did respond informally to the Irvine Company . Responded to all testimony and if conunents raised were significant issues and needed to be addressed. Said staff didn't feel there was substantive issues t h at needed to be clarified. Irvine Company conunented favorably . Heather added she felt they should respond to several of the things in the Irvine Company letter in detail . EDAW stated that generally , response is to clarify or identify further. It was mentioned that they didn 't have to respond to conunents at Coastal Commiss i on hearing as conunent period had expired on Nov. 7th . Heather then asked if staff saw any probl em re NPDES permit and the fact that construction can onl y occur from December to April? REL answered no, didn't see any problem. Ray added that the Coastal Commission approval incorporated the conditions set forth by the Department of Fish and Game which were basically the same conditions set forth three years ago . At that time had northerly a l ignment and now have southerly alignment . Feel conditions are reasonable to minimize the impacts. (31-b) Consultant indicated REL report summarized their information so would not need to report further . REL added that the record should indicate that the Directors have considered advantages and disadvantages of alternatives including no project . Quickly reviewed each alternative again : -3 - New pump station -costs in exc ess of $1 ,0 85 ,000 Advantages -Minimum disturbance to the environment. Not in traffic. Disadvan tages -High cost. Will be buying e n ergy from tha t day forward . I ncreased maintenance costs. Gravity t u nnel sewe r Advantages -Has minimum i mpact on reserve. Have minimum impact as far as vehicle traff ic ~ with the exception of earth removed & transported out . Would not consume a ny e nergy and low in mtce. Dis advan ta ge s -Most expensive $2.6 million Back Bay sewer Advantage s -Least expens i ve in i mp l ementation per i od and does not consume any energy. Very minimal amount of maintenance cost . Disadvantages -Maximum impact on environment. Does impac t ecological r es erve. Are mitigation measures in permit to minimize this. No project alternative -status quo Still continue to pay energy costs. No d isruption to e nvironment outside of wha t is there now. Would not off er sewer service to undeveloped properties within drainage area. Other alternative methods of disposal would have to be found . Heather then moved to incorporate this review into the Big Canyon Drainage Area EIR. Motion seconded and carried. 3\(t.'>--)-P"°i:° ,,... Wedaa then spoke as a member of the Coastal Commission. Asked if 3\(~)~decision of Regional Commission is appealed to the State Commission, does the District provide all to Jackie or does someone from the District go up and fight appeal. He was answered that the District has Mr. Tebbetts and EDAW to help fight appeal . Wedaa added that if appeal if filed, felt the Joint Board ought to see that necessary help is provided to District 5 on this system. Vardoulis said he thought we should be using the services of the consultant and , if necessary, Ray Lewis . Wedaa said he just wanted to be sure they got help. Heather mentioned that our Regional Commission r epresentative to the State Commission abstained on the vote. He was unhappy about ?. receiving the environmental document that morning . -I (P) 7 d, -r --~ (32) Jackie then moved that the southerly route of the Back Bay Trunk be selected the best alternative project for District 5 . Motion was seconded . Tom Woodruff recormnended that certain findings be included in that motion such as: (1) That this approval of the Back Bay g ravity sewer line is as approved and conditioned by the South Coast Regional Coastal Cormnission on Monday, Novembe r 10th . -4- (2) That noting the changes that have been required and incorporated into the project by Fish and Game and Coastal Conunission conditions and mitigation measures described in the Final EIR wh ich avoid and mitigate effects (3) Specific economic and other considerations such as energy costs, capital costs and a greater degree of reliability for this system make the project alternative described in the Final EIR such as the pump station not feasible. (4) Heather thought a health hazard finding should also be added. Because of the gravity problem of the sewer lin e and potential of overflow and the fact that the has a consistently high chloraform cx:::iurut, health hazard should be considered. TLW reiterated that motion approves southerly alignment and authorizes going forward based on findings. (See attached summary of findings from TLW) Motion carried. -5 - TOM: X REF : BOARD EIR GUIDELINS Section 15088 After certifiaation of the EIR as as adequate , and when after deliberation , if the District (#5 ) concludes t h a t the Back Bay Gravity a l ternative is the favored al t ernat ive and approves that alte rn ative as t h e "Project ", th e Board in making its decision shou ld make th e fo ll owing findings: 1. Approve the Back Bay gravity sewer line a l ternative (as approved a nd conditioned bythe Coastal Commission, South Coast Region on 11 /10/80) 2 . Changes have been required a nd incorporated into the project--notabl y the Fish & Game and Coastal Commission condit i o ns, and mitigation me as u res described i n the Final EIR --which avoid a nd mitiga te the significant environmental effects described in the Final EIR; a nd 3 .Specific econ o mic and other con siderations ,-- e.g . energy costs , capital costs a nd t h e poss ibl e unre liability of pumping a l ternatives make the project a l ternative s described in the Final EIR In feasib l ~. VJ-iVv 7U:f <f . pft;J,·J t ~ ~ rcid ~~~~~ ~ 4~111~te~~ fi_ aAU\. L-~~ ~0 ~~~ if.TEBBETTS ~n,~. fl!. ~~ T )1/c~t../<-~~v· -6 - 11-12-80 REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN I HAVE ESTABLISHED A SAFETY GUIDANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING AND MONITORING THE DISTRICTS' PERSONNEL SAFETY PROGRAM, BECAUSE OF HIS VAST EXPERIENCE AS A PROFESSIONAL SAFETY ENGINEER) I HAVE APPOINTED DON FOX TO CHAIR THIS COMMITTEE, THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT FROM THIS SAFETY COMMITTEE ON A SEMI-ANNUAL BASIS BEGINNING JUNEJ 1981, /'' REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO, 9-D ON REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SANTA ANA RIVER BY THE COUNTY) TO BE USED AS GENERAL FILL MATERIAL BY THE DISTRICTS, THIS IS BEING HELD UP PENDING A PERMIT FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS) WHICH DOES NOT LOOK TOO FAVORABLE FOR THE COUNTY, ./ A DRAFT FEDERAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE. WILL RECOMMEND WHAT ROLE OCEANS SHOULD PLAY. IN WASTE MANAGEMENT. THE DRAFT REPORT SAYS THAT FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE) "OCEAN DISPOSAL EITHER BY BARGE OR THROUGH A PIPE SHOULD CONTINUE TO· BE A DISPOSAL OPTION UNDER APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS AND WITH ADEQUATE MONITORING· SAFEGUARDS IN THOSE AREAS WHERE OUR PRESENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE INDICATES ONLY MINIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL HARM FROM SLUDGE DISPOSAL," A RESEARCH PROJECT OF THIS NATURE IS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY ~ THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE AT THIS TIME, 'J(_ a.) \._! TO DATEJ THE DISTRICTS HAVE RECEIVED $543J616.91 FROM REFINERS '-r'" UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S DOMESTIC CRUDE OIL ENTITLEMENTS PROGRAM. THIS PROGRAM IS DUE TO CONTINUE UNTIL OCTOBERJ 1981. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . OUR ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST WERE $31J318.76. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M., . WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26TH. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: JAMES WARD ~ .. . . . """" ~IL IP ANTHq_~y 61cMRn EnG~ VICKI EVANS ..... -. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . DISTRICT NO. l.WILL MEET AT 4:30 P.M,J IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING.