HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-11-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
November 5, 1980
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1980 -7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange
County, California, will be held at the above hour and date.
JWS: jc
Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
DISTRICT 1 Wednesday, November 26th at 4:30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 26th at 5:30 p.m.
.'-ill FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -To be determined at Joint Board Meeting
November
December
January
~ebruary
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE · .
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
JOINT BOARD MEETINGS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Nov 12, 1980 Nov 26, 1980
Dec 10, 1980 None Scheduled
Jan 14, 1981 Jan 28, 1981
Feb 11, 1981 Feb 25, 1981
Mar 11, 1981 Mar 25, 1981
Apr 8, 1981 Apr 22, 1981
May 13, 1981 May 27, 1981
June 10, 1981 June 24, 1981
July 8, 1981 lfone ·scheduled
Aug 12, 1981 None Scheduled
Sep 9, 1981 Sep 23, 1981
Oct 14, 1981 Oct 28, 1981
Nov 11, 1981 Nov 25, 1981
t-,~ ~OARDS OF DIRECTORS
1 ---· r· --
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, CaliEomia 1 0844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain VaJley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Cede 714
540-2910
962-24·11
. -·· ----· ··--·-··---···--..--·-
AGENDA
ME.ET I NG DA TE
NOVEMBER 12, ·1980 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P.M. IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any
See supplemental agenda
(6) EACH DISTRICT ..
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will
be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 -October 8, 1980, regular and
October 22, 1980, adjourned
District 2 -. October 8, 1980, regular
District 3 -October 8, 1980, regular
District 5 -October 8, 1980, regular and
October 29, 1980, adjourned
District 6 -October 8, 1980, regular
District 7 -October 8, 1980, regular
District 11 -October 8, 1980, regular
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying pa}rment of claims of the
joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called
only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for
any Districts.) See page (s) "A" and "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Join1: Operating Fund
Capital OuUay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working Capital F\Uld.
Self-Funded Imuranca Funds
DISTRICT NO. l
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. l
DISTRICT NO. S
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
10/08/80
$ 173,496.45
1,631,325.42
37,583.43
1,668.84
226,197.87
130,234.11
77,089.92
15.30
5,459.28
7,704.65
7,525.55
2,037.12
$2,300,337-94
10/22/80
$220,683.92
56, 195 .. 92 .
30,760.91
2,527.57
--· ··-·--·---
20,_22b9~-----· -·
11,4o~~·5~·-·-·-·.
~Q.QO __
1,~~~~~.9 ···-....
270,_~~~-~t6 _____ ..
28 •.Z).~-~ 3~: .. ·---_ --···-·. __ .
$652,501.98
(9) ALL DISTRIC'i'S
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or· member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the.public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to appTove all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not speci£ically removed from same.
-2-
Q
I
(_9) (_CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8,1980,
ratifying ac.ti.on of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 4335 to
Smith Electric/Unico, Inc. for ·eme.rgency Repairs to Electric
Motor for No. 5 Sharples Centrifuge at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-008, increasing the total amotmt
from $5,400.00 to $6,169.62
(b) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8,
1980, ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order
No. 4351 to R. E. Chubbock Company for Replacement Electric
Hoist for Plant No. 1 Headworks Chlorine Tank Handling,
Specification No. E-109, increasing the amount from $5,050.00
plus tax and freight to a total amount of $5,689.02; and
authorizing payment to Craneveyor, Inc. for said equipment
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of David Erdkamp,
currently an Assistant Civil Engineer with the County of Orange,
as Associate Engineer, at Range 1062A, Step 4, ($14.27/hr.); and
authorizing the transfer of 800 hours of accumulated sick leave
to a maximum paid sick leave credit not to exceed $11,416.00, to
be credited to said employee and utilized only when sick leave
eamed as a District employee is exhausted, provided, as a further
condition, that no portion of the transferred accumulated sick
leave credit is eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination,
death or retirement
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report relative
to removal of sediment from the Santa Ana River by the County of
Orange to be used as backfill and general fill material for the
construction of secondary treatment facilities at Treatment Plant
No. 2 • See page "C"
(e) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing
emergency Purchase Order No. 4477 to Worthington Service
Corporation for Repair of 24" Johnston Single-Stage Pump for
No. 2 Trickling Filter, Specification No. R-009, in the amount
of $10,500.00
(f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Leon and Carol McClain, et al. in the amount of $1,520,000 for
alleged expenses and damages due to a fly and odor problem at
Plant No. 1 during the period of June 20 -August 15, 1980, and
refer to the Districts liability claims administrator and
General Co\Dlsel for appropriate action
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Laboratory Bench and Fume Hood Additions at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-073, authorizing in increase
of $5,624.07 to the contract with Equinox-Malibu for lowering the
floor elevation of the gas cylinder storage area and entry ramp
and modifying the enclosure fence. See page "D"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
' -· .... ~~-. . '
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
S & J Chevrolet requesting withdrawal of their bid
submitted in connection with Specification No. A-103,
One (1) Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, due to
omission of cleaner unit, and granting said request.
See page "E"
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation
and recoDDBendation and awarding purchase of One (1)
Truck-Motlllted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, Specification
No. A-103, to International Harvester Company in the
amOlmt of $56, 146. OS. See page "F"
(j) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Trailer-Mounted
Air Compressor, Specification No. E-110, to Sullair of Los Angeles
in the amount of $9,974.60. See page "G"
(j) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Purchase·Order
No. 4596 to Dellinger Corporation for proprietary purchase of
Two Repla~ement Gas Filters for Gas Compressors at Plant No. 2,
Specification No. P-040, in the amount of $9,556.96 plus freight
DISTRICT 2
(k) Consideration of Resolution No." 80-170-2, to receive and file bid
tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-14-4B,
to R. M. Skamnes in the amount of· $107, 358 .12. See pages "H"
and "I"
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-171-2, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR, to
L. S. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, in the amount
of $153 ,010. 00. See pages "J" and "K"
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-172-2, approving Addendum No. 1
to the Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry & Associates for
design ·of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21,
for additional surveying work required, and increasing the authorized
amount for said surveying services from $12,000 to an amotmt not to
exceed $16,000. See page "L"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
·"
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 6
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-173-6, approving plans and
specifications for Abandonment of Dover Drive Trtulk Meter Vault
and Connecting Sewer, .Contract No. 6-8, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids.
See page "M"
DISTRICT 7
(o) Consideration of motion authorizing payment to John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc. in the amotult of $15,345.02 for emergency repairs to
District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main
Street damaged by Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., contractor
for Pacific Telephone Company
(p) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Pacific
Pipeline Construction Co., dated October 27, 1980, denying
responsibility for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer
at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street. See page "N"
(.q) Consideration of motion directing the staff to file a claim
against Pacific Telephone Company and Pacific Pipeline Construction
Co. for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur
Boulevard and Main Street in the amol.lllt of $15,345.02 plus
District expenses; and authorizing the General Counsel to
file any necessary legal proceedings to recover said damages
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS ,,~-·-. ·'
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate the purchase
of a maximum of four (4) Ashbrook Simon Hartley (Winklepress) belt filter
presses, Specification No. E-111, for use in the Districts' sewage sludge
dewatering operation for consideration by the Boards at the December 10th
Joint Board meeting (identical to ten units being installed under Job
No. P2-24-2, Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities for the Solids Handling ~
and Dewatering Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2) See page "0"
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee
certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers
for engineering services re Task 1 of the Phase II Modifications
and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment
System (ACTS). See page "P"
Cb) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-169, approving agreement with
John Carollo Engineers for engineering services re Phase II
Modifications and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL-ACTS Pilot
Plant, and.providing for Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc.
to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for said
work, subject to receipt of approval and grant assurances for said
work from the State Water Resources Control Board, on a per diem
fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $598,500.00 for Task 1 work.
See page "Q"
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted by
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accotmtants, for the
year ending June 30, 1980 (previously mailed to Directors by auditors)
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Division 1, Oxygen Generation & Storage Facilities,
and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities, for 75-MGD Improved
Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-2, authorizing an addition of
$66,893.32 to the contract with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for
miscellaneous modifications required in the cryogenic process and
interfacing of Jobs Nos. P2-23-2 and P2-23-6, Major Facilities for
75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. See page "R"
(.15) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider
personnel matters relative to meet-and-confer sessions with employee units
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action, if any, on items discussed in executive session
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, November 26, 1980V
(20) DISTRICT 2
Other business and conununications or supplemental ·agenda items, if any
-6-
: (21) DISTRICT 2
(22)
(23)
(24)
C.2-s)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 6
Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and
specifications for the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of
Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 11-13-2, authorizing an addition of $89,455.00 to the contract with
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. & John A. Artukovich, Jr., J.V. for
miscellaneous modifications, dewatering and extension of tunnel
See page "S"
DISTRICT 11
Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(31) DISTRICT S
Consideration of actions relative to the Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report re Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage Area:
(a) Verbal staff report re Coastal Commission hearing on November 10th
on application for Coastal Commission·permit re sewerage
improvements for the Big Canyon drainage area
(b) Verbal report of engineering consultant, EDAW, Inc., re Final
Supplemental EIR
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received
after public hearing on October 29th re Draft Supplemental EIR, if
any
(d) Discussion and further staff comments
(e) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report re Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon
Drainage Area; and certify that said Final Supplemental EIR has been
completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, As Amended
(Copy of said report to be delivered to District 5 Directors)
-7-
(32) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of approval of best alternative project to sewer the
Big Canyon drainage area
(33) DISTRICT 5
Other business and conmnmications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(34) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
II
,,
-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 812i
oE Orange County, Califomia 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AG EM DA
MEETING· DATE
NOVEMBER 12, 1980 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOiNING THE DISTRICTS'. BOARD ROOM.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3). Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) ·Recognition.of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items
(5) Consideration of motion to receive. and file minute excerpts, if any
Sec sapplcmcatal agcnc1a
(6) EACH DISTRICT
(7)
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will
be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 . . -October 8, 1980, regular and
October 22, 1980, adjourned
District 2
District 3
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 11
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
October 8, 1980, regular
-October 8, 1980, regular
-October 8; 1980, regular and
October 29, 1980, adjourned
-October 8, 1980, regular
-October 8, 1980, regular
-October 8, 1980, regular
~ q!Jc6'-
,, 1% I(µ_ 'Hfl}(,
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
0 ,,
1
~:1J I "~:10
~ " , csD
(c) General Counsel
(8)
~Oil CALL VOTE---
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the
joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called
only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented wiless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for
any Districts.) See page (s) "A" and "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Join'C Operadng Fwid
Capital Outlay Revolving Fwid -
Joint Working Capi1:al Fund
Self-Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRICT NO. l
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. S
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
10/08/80
$ 173,496. 45
1 ,631,325.42
37,583.43
1,668.84
226,197,87
130,234. 11
77,089.92
15.30
5,459.28
7,704.65
7,525.55
2,037 .12
$2,300,337.94
10/22/80
$220,683.92
56,195.32
30,760.91
2,527.57
9,802.35
20,551.98
!1,405.52
230.00
1,438.60
270, 186.96
28,718.35
$652,501.98
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all ~genda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8,1980,
ratifying ac.tion of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 4335 to
Smith. Electric/Unico, Inc. for· ·emergency Repairs to Electric
Motor for No. 5 Sharples Centrifuge at Plant No. 1-,-·· -· -
Specification No. R-008, increasing the total amount
from $5,400.00 to $6,169.62
(b) Consideration of motion amending Board action of October 8~
1980, ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order
No. 4351 to R. E. Chubbock Company for Replacement-frle·ctric
Hoist for Plant No. 1 Headworks Chlorine Tank HandJing, . .
Specification No. E-109, increasing the amount from $5, 05 0. 00
plus tax and freight to a total amount of $5,689.02; and
authorizing payment to Craneveyor, Inc. for said eq_lJ.:ipm~nt
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of David Erdkamp,
currently an Assistant Civil Engineer with the Coun-ey_of Orange,
as Associate Engineer, at Range 1062A, Step 4, ($14.27/hr.); and
authorizing the transfer of 800 hours of accumulated sick leave
to a maximum paid sick leave credit not to exceed $11,416.00,. to
be credited to said employee and utilized only when sick leave
earned as a District employee is exhausted, provided,·as a further
condition, that no portion of the transferred accumulated sick
leave credit is eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination,
death or retirement
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report relative
to removal of sediment from the Santa Ana River by the County of .. _
Orange to be used as backfill and general .fill material for the -··
construction of secondary treatment facilities at Treatment· Plant
No. 2 . See page "C"
(e) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing
emergency Purchase Order No. 4477 to Worthington Service
Corporation for Repair of 24" Johnston Single-Stage Pump for
No. 2 Trickling Filter, Specification No. R-009, in the amount
of $10,500.00
(f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Leon and Carol McClain, et al. in the amount of $1,520,000 for
alleged expenses and damages due to a fly and odor problem at
Plant No. 1 during the period of June 20 -August 15, 1980, and
refer to the Districts liability claims administrator and
General Cotmsel for appropriate action
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Laboratory Bench and Fume Hood Additions at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-073, authorizing in increase
of $5,624.07 to the contract with Equinox-Malibu for lowering the
floor elevation of the gas cylinder storage area and entry ramp
and modifying the enclosure fence ... See page "D"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
'
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
S & J Chevrolet requesting withdrawal of their bid
submitted in connection with Specification No. A-103,
One (1) Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, due to
omission of cleaner unit, and granting said request.
See page "E"
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1)
Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner, Specification
No. A-103, to International Harvester Company in the
amount of $56,146.05. See page "F"
Ci) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Trailer-Mounted
Air Comr~essor, Specification No. E-110, to Sullair of Los Angeles
in the amount of $9,974.60. See page "G"
(j) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Purchase-Order
No. 4596 to Dellinger Corporation for proprietary purchase of
Two Repla~ement Gas Filters for Gas Compressors at Plant No. 2,
Specification.No. P-040, in the amount of $9,556.96 plus freight
DISTRICT 2
(k) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-170-2, to receive and file bid
tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-14-4B,
to R. M. Skamnes in the amount of· $107, 358 .12. See pages "H"
and "I"
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-171-2, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR, to
L. S. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, in the amount
of $153,010.00. See pages "J" and "K"
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-172-2, approving Addendum No. 1
to the Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry & Associates for
design ·of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21,
for additional surveying work required, and increasing the authorized
amount for said surveying services from $12,000 to an amotlllt not to
exceed $16,000. See page "L"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 6
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-173-6, approving-plans and
specifications for Abandonment of Dover Drive Trunk Meter Vault
and Connecting Sewer, Contract No. 6-8, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids.
See page "M"
DISTRICT 7
(o) Consideration of motion authorizing payment to John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc. in the amotmt of $15,345."02 for emergency repairs to
District's RA-30 Subtrwik Sewer at MacArthur Boulevard and Main
Street damaged by Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., contractor
for Pacific Telephone Company
(p) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Pacific
Pipeline Construction Co., dated October 27, 1980, denying
responsibility for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer
at MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street. See page "N"
(q) Consideration of motion directing the staff to file a claim
against Pacific Telephone Company and Pacific Pipeline Construction
Co. for damages to District's RA-30 Subtrunk Sewer at MacArthur
Boulevard and Main Street in the amount of $15,345.02 pltis
District expenses; and authorizing the General Cotmsel to
file any necessary legal proceedings to recover said damages
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate the purchase
of· a maximum of ~our (4) Ashbrook Simon Hartley (Winklepress) belt filter
presses, Specification No. E-111, for use in the Districts' sewage sludge
dewatering operation for consideration by the Boards at the December 10th
Joint Board meeting (identical to ten units being installed under Job
No. P2-24-2, Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities for the Solids Handling
and Dewatering Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2) See page "0"
(.12) ALL DISTRICTS
(.a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Conunittee
certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers
for engineering services re Task 1 of the Phase II Modifications
and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon Treatment
System (ACTS). See page "P"
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-169, approving agreement with
John Carollo Engineers for engineering services re Phase II
Roll call Vote or Cast Modifications and Operation Program for the 1-MGD JPL-ACTS Pilot
unanimous BaUot Plant, and· providing for Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc.
to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for said
work, subject to receipt of approval and grant assurances for said
work from the State Water Resources Control Board, on a per diem
fee basis, for an amount not to exceed $598,500.00 for Task 1 work.
See page "Q"
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Report submitted by
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants, for the
year ending June 30, 1980 (previously mailed to Directors by auditors)
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(.15)
(_16)
(17)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Division 1, Oxygen Generation & Storage Facilities,
and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities, for 75-MGD Improved
Tre~tment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-2, authorizing an addition of
$66,893.32 to the contract with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for
miscellaneous modifications required in the cryogenic process and
interfacing of Jobs Nos. P2-23-2 and P2-23-6, Major Facilities for
75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. See page "R"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider
personnel matters relative to meet-and-confer sess)..ons with employee units
r~ ''>
' ,,,.--ALL DISTRICTS o.~)
Consideration of action, if anr,,, on items discussed in executive session
'?):-< z I.· f ,,c ;Jc t./: c-J fl .A-
ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
{19) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, November 26, 1980k:J1l
(20) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
-6-
(21) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn 0 :>D
(22) DISTRICT 3
Other business and comrnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any
( 23) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn J-:;i ~...;
(24) DISTRICT 6
Other business and comrnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any
( 25) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to ad journ f ·J'6
(26) DISTRICT 7
Other business a nd comrnunications or supplementa l agenda items , if any
( 27) DISTRICT 7
(28)
(29)
Consideration of motion to adjourn Y ·_ro
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and
specifications for the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 a nd 2, Portion of
Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 11-13-2, authorizing an addition of $89,455.00 to the contract with
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. & John A. Artukovich, Jr., J.V. for
mis ce llaneous modifications, dewatering and extension of tunnel
See p age "S"
DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supp l emental agenda items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn y _) )
(31) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of actions relative to the Supp l emental Environmental Impact
Report re Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage Ar ea :
(a) Verbal ~taf~ report re Coastal Commission hearing on Nov embe r 10th
c;m app lica tion for .Co astal Commission p e rmit re sewerage
improvements for t h e Big Canyo n drainage area
(b) Verbal report of engineering consultant, EDAW, In c ., re Final
Supplemental EIR
(c) Consideration of motion to r eceive and file written comments received
after public h earing on October 29th re Draft Suppleme nta l EIR, if
any
(d) Discussion and further staff comrnents
Reso, No. 80 ~174-5
(e) Consideration of mt>~i-0n to receive, file and approve Final Supplemental
Impact Report re Sewerage Impro vements for Bi g Ca nyon
' Th e Gen era l Co un s el wil l ; and certify that said Final Supplemental EIR has b een
co mment re chan g ing this compliance with the State and District Guid e lines
ite m t o a reso lut i on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, As Ame nd ed
report to be delivered to District 5 Directors)
-7 -
(32) DISTRICT 5
(33)
Consideration of approval of best alternative project to sewer the
Big Canyon drainage area ~ 4 161-i C,_, Q, ()IL( /~ ~uJ u<-.
.DISTRICT 5 . ''>r ~'-'-H·t.-, t ~ r.el.i.,:~
Other business and CODDlll.Dlications or supplemental agenda items, if any
. (34) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adj oum f; t1
-8-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County .3onitotion Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date
November 12, 1980 -7:30 p.m.
Post OHice Box 8127
l 0844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92 70 8
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed
with the agenda material summarizing the bills ·paid since the last
Joint Board meeting.
To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the
agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's
Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in
the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and
contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract
budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included
in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the
contracts being recommended for award.
Joint Boards
No . 9-a and b -Amending Board Action re Purchase Orders Nos.
4351 and 4JJ5.
These two actions increase the Boards' October authorizations
for the replacement of the electric hoist at Plant No. 1 (Increased
cost $769.62) and for emergency repairs to an electric motor (Increased
cost, $639.02) for a sludge centrifuge, also at Plant No. 1. These
items were of an emergency nature and the initial quotations re-
ceived from the vendors did not reflect the final cost after all
the work was performed. The staff recommends amending these purchase
orders as shown.
No. 9-c -Consideration of Employment of David Erdkamp as
Associate Engineer.
...
Mr. David Erdkamp, age 42, presently employ ed as Assistant
Civil Engineer with the County of Orange, has applied for the position
of Associate Engineer with the Districts. He has been employed with
EMA for approximately 17~ years, working primarily on design of flood
and road facilities. In seeking the position of Associate Engineer
with the Districts, Mr. Erdkamp has requested that his sick leave,
accumulated while an employee of the County, be transferred to his
employment with the Districts on condition that it would only be
used after the sick leave earned while employed by the Districts
was exhausted . The transferred sick leave from County service
would not be considered for payoff at termination, death o r retire-
ment and would be valued at the hire-in amount of $14 .27 per hour.
The maximum sick leave liability to the Districts would be 800
hours, not to exceed $11,416 . The staff recotillilends acceptance of
Mr. Erdkamp's request and his hiring at Step 4 as Associate Engineer.
All employee benefits other than the above-mentioned transfer of
sick leave will be the same as for any new employee.
No. 9-d -Removal of Sediment from the Santa Ana River.
At the October Board meeting, the staff requested and the
Boards granted authority to negotiate with the County of Orange for
sediment removed from the Santa Ana River . At that time, the staff
pointed out that the material could cost as much as $2 .00 per yard
or could be offered at no expense to the Districts. The County of
Orange has now received bids and hopes to award a contract soon.
The contractor's bid provides that approximately 150 ,000 yards of
sediment from the Pacific Ocean to Hamilton Avenue be delivered to
the Districts' Plant No. 2 site at no cost . ,Upstream of Hamilton
Avenue, the Districts have the option to pay the difference between
the contractor's price to remove and keep the dirt or a higher price
to deliver the dirt to the Districts' site.
The staff recon:nnends accepting the 150,000 yards at no cost
and not receiving the upstream sediment. The 150,000 yards should
be adequate for near term requirements. There is a possibility,
however, that the Corps of Engineers may not issue a permit to
the County for removal of this sediment, and if so, the County may
not be able to award the contract.
No. 9-e -Ratification of Staff's Action in Issuing Purchase
Order No. 4477 for Repairs of the P-ump for· the No. 2 Trickling
Filter.
This motion requests ratification of the staff's action in
authorizing emergency repairs to be made to the 24-inch Johnston
single-stage pump for the No. 2 trickling filter. This pump is
the key element in moving the wastewater through this secondary
treatment stage.
The staff requests approval of payment for repair of this
pump for an amount not to exceed $10,500.
No. 9-g -Change Order No . 1 to Job No. PW-073.
The staff is requesting approval of Change Order No. 1 for
an addition of $5,624.07 to the contract. The contractor, Equinox-
Malibu, was directed by the staff to lower the floor elevation of
the gas cylinder storage area and entry ramp and to modify the
enclosure fence. The additional cost is based on time and materials
-2-
in-accordance with the specifications. The staff recommends approval
of this change order which increases the contract amount from $88,750
to $94,374.07. There is no time extension allowed for the work.
No. 9-h -Award of Flush Truck -Bid Specification No . A-103,
--···-·--. -· ROtihfi~d Hydraulic s ·ewer Cleaner. _____ .
Five bids were received October 28th for a flush truck. The
apparent low bid of $27,296 .06 (S & J Chevrolet) was priced in
error. According to the bidder, the price shown includes the cab
and chassis only. We have received a letter from S & J Chevrolet
requesting their bid be withdrawn due to the obvious error.
It is recommended that the bid from S & J Chevrolet be rejected
due to incompleteness. There is a tie bid from two companies for
the lowest responsible bid. It is further recommended that the award
be made to International Harvester Company for their bid of $56,146.05
including sales tax on the basis of their Company location in Orange
County. (Budget, $65, 000) .
No. 9-i -Award of Specification No. E-110.
Four bids were received on October 28, 1980 for the purchase of
One (1) Trailer-Mounted Air Compressor. The bids ranged from a low
of $9,974.60 submitted by Sullair of Los Angeles, to a high of
$11,221.16. The staff recommends award of this equipment purchase
contract to Sullair in the low bid amount of $9,974 .60. (Budget,
$12 '000) ..
District No . 2
No. 9-k -Award of Contract No . 2-14-4B.
Three bids were received on November 4th ranging from a low of
$107,358.12 to a high of $119,000. The engineer's estimate for the
work was $61,000. Since the three bids are close to each other, the
staff believes that the engineer's estimate was not realistic and
recommends award to A. M. Skamnes, the low bidder, for $107,358.12.
This project is the construction of an emergency control gate
on the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. The gate, to be located
adjacent to La Palma Avenue and Weir ~any?n Road (projected~ would
allow the District to shut down the line in the event of a rlood
washout by the Santa Ana River upstream within Santa Ana Canyon.
The shut down would prevent the floodwaters from filling this major
trunk facility and reaching our treatment plants.
No. 9-1 -Award of Contract No. 2-14-SR.
Bids were received on November 4th for the Santa Ana River
Interceptor Erosion Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR. Four bids
were received, ranging from a low of $153,010, su~mitted by L. S.
Hawley Corp., and Paul Hubbs of Irwindale, to a high of $247,125.
-3-
The engineer's estimate for this work was $198,000. The staff
recotmilends award to L. S. Hawley Corporation and Paul Hubbs of
Irwindale ·in the low bid amount of $153,010 . It should be noted
that the Distri ct has received approval for expenditures in the
amount of $121,000 for this corrective contract from the Federal
Government Disaster Relief Fund as the work was necessitated by
the heavy rains in storm season 1979-80 during which the Santa
Ana River changed course. The staff will continue to
negotiate with the Disaster Relief office in an attempt to receive
full funding for the project .
No. 9-m -Approving Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Services
Agreement with Lowry & Associates.
At the May, 1979 meeting, the Board of Directors of District
No. 2 approved an agreement for $50,000 plus actual costs of pre-
liminary and construction surveys not to exceed $12,000 in con-
nection with the design of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor . This
project has gone through final design and the construction is pre-
sently in progress. The engineer has requested an increase in the
surveying per diem authorization from $12,000 to an amount not to
exceed $16,000. This increased cost is a result of additional survey
work required to realign the sewer in the field upon discovery of
undisclosed utilities particularly oil and gas lines.
The staff reconnnends approval of this $4,000 increase.
District No. 6
No. 9-n -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Dover Meter
Vault, Contiact No. 6-8.
The engineer has completed the preparation of plans and speci-
fications for the Dover Meter Vault . This project removes the vault
which has not been operative for several years to allow better flow
conditions in the sewer, as well as minimizing maintenance . The
engineer's estimate for this project is $30,000. (Budget, $50,000).
District No. 7
No. 9-o, p, q -Authorizing Payment to John A. Artukovich for
Emergency Repairs to RA-30 Sewer Line.
On October 11th, a Pacific Telephone contractor, Pacific Pipeline
Construction Company , damaged the District's RA-30, 12-inch subtrunk
sewer located easterly of MacArthur Boulevard at Main Stree t within
the City of Irvine. The District staff ordered the necessary e~ergency
repairs to the line in order to protect the public health and safety .
As can be se.en from the letter in your agenda material, Pacific
Pipeline routinely denied any responsibility for the repairs.
-4-
The actions appearing on your agenda are to receive and file
the October 27th letter from Pacific Pipeline and to authorize
payment of $15,345.02 to John A. Artukovich for emergency repair
of the line . The staff recommends that the General Counsel be
directed to pursue the reimbursement of all costs from either the ·
Pacific Telephone Company or their contractor.
All Dis·tricts
No _. 11 -Consideration of Motion Authorizing General Manager
to Neaotiate for Purchase of a Maximum of Four Ashbrook Simon Hartle
Winklepress , Speci ication No. E-1
During the preparation of the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-24-2, Solids Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities at
Plant No. 2, the belt filter presses to be furnished were pre-
qualified in accordance with EPA regulations . Several manufacturers
of belt filter presses were evaluated, resulting in only two of the
nine companies being recommended for inclusion in the specifications
to submit price quotations to prospective bidders for this project.
This project was delayed approximately three months because of pro-
tests filed by three of the disqualified manufacturers , however ,
EPA did uphold· ·the findings of the Districts' Boards of Directors
and staff .. ,· ·
ii ·,;
Bids for this $15 million project at Plant No . 2 were received
in August, 1980 and the contractor has indicated he will supply ten
presses manufactured by Ashbrook Simon Hartley (Winklepress) . It is
the staff's recorrnnendation that consideration should be given to
t h e purchase of three or four additional presses at this time from
the manufacturer. A staff report is included in the agenda material,
Page "O".
It is recommended that the General Manager, in consultation
with the Joint Chairman and General Counsel, negotiate the purchase
of additional belt presses for Board consideration at the December
meeting .
No. 12-a and b -Selection Corrnnittee Certification re Final
Negotiated Fee with John Garollo Engineers on Task I of Phase II
Modifications on JPL-ACTS Process.
Pursuant to the Boards' authorization , the Selection Corrrrnittee
has negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services
in connection with the JPL-ACTS process .
A Committee report and recommendation is enclosed in the
supporting documents. See Page "P".
No. 13 -Annual Report for Year Ended ~une 30 , 1980.
The Districts 1 auditors, Peat., Marwick, Mitchell & Company
have mailed to each Director a copy of the completed annual audit
-5-
report . The action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file
it. If any Director has any questions concerning the report , please
call our Districts' Director of Finance, Wayne Sylv ester, or the
General Manager (telephone 540-2910).
No. 14 -Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P2-23-2 .
This contract with Air Products, Inc., in the amount of $8.3
million for the furnishing of the Oxygen Generation and Dissolution
Equipment, is a part of the 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No.
2 , and was awarded in December, 1977. Since the award of the con-
tract, the Districts' staff and consulting engineers have been
working closely with the contractor in the construction of the
cryrogenic oxygen generation facilities. Most of this equipment,
which is valued at approximately $6.6 million of the total contract
amount, was constructed at the main manufacturing plant of Air
Products in Allentown, PA.
The plans and specifications were prepared to allow competitive
pricing from Union Carbide as well as Air Products. There have been
several months of discussions between the contractor, the Districts'
staff and the Districts' consulting engineer to resolve the intentions
of the plans and specifications as well as the proprietary equipment
furnished by Air Products.
This change order includes 31 items of contract changes result-
ing in a total addition to the contract in the amount of ~66,893 .32.
Many of the items contained in this change order are the result
of the interfacing between this contract and the $30 million contract
known as P2-23-6 to construct the secondary treatment facilities as
designed. The staff recommends approval of this change order which
represents approximately 8/lOths of one percent of change in the
total contract amount.
No . 15 -Executive Session re Meet-and-Confer Personnel
Matters .
A separate status report from the Special Committee on Personnel
Guidelines for Management will be sent to active Directors before
Wednesday's Board meeting for consideration in executive session.
District No . 11
No. 28 -Authorizigg_ Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11 -1 3-2 .
This change order adds $89,455 to the contract amount, making
the total contract for this work $7,816,514 .62.
The original specifications and the dewatering permit
issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board allowed a de -
watering discharge line across the State beach . However, the State
Department of Harbors, Beaches and Parks declined to issue a permit.
-6-
Therefore, the contractor was directed to construct a line to
the Santa Ana River, a distance of 4,000 feet.
It. was determined in the field that the siphon under the
Southern California Edison cooling lines had to ·be lowered an
additional six feet to protect these critical lines. This
additional depth substantially increased the _dewatering discharge
from that which was originally anticipated and exceeded the
hydraulic capacity of the 4,000 foot dewatering discharge line.
Accordingiy, a relief dewatering system was constructed to the
Talbert Channel at Brookhurst using additional pipe and pumps.
The third major item of work on this change order involves the
construction of the tunnel under the Talbert Flood Control Channel
at Brookhurst Street. This tunnel had to be lengthened in order to
avoid construction within the flood control right of way and to
provide a safe working area. Again, field investigati on determined
that the flood control right of way was saturated and the staff was
concerned that the levee might collapse into the channel if the
tunnel was not extended .
District No . 5
No. 31 -Staff Report on Coastal Commission Hearing and Approval
of Final EIR for Big Canyon Drainage Area.
As the Directors are aware, the District's application for a
Coastal Cormnission permit for this project will be heard on November
10, 1980. The project has received a favorable Commission staff
report. A verbal report on the outcome of the hearing will be pre-
sented to the Board Wednesday night.
On October 8th, the Directors received, filed and set for
hearing the Draft EIR on this project. The public hearing was held
on October 29th. The CEQA requirements for an EIR have been met and
copies of the document were sent to all State, Federal and local
agencies for comment as well as to interested parties and the news
media.
The action on your agenda is to receive and file any written
comments received since the October 29th public hearing, including
any conditions required by the Coastal Commission, and then to adopt
and certify the EIR after final determination of what will be the
approved project.
-7-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
RESOLUTIONS· AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
NOVEMBER 12>. _ 1980 -7 :30 P·.·M·.:
I ::::
:t::-
1
t-A
I ::::
•J:> en rn
2
t:'J
:1>
.........
-I
rt1
3
~
00
)> r-r-
t:j .......
en
--4 :;a
~
n
-I :.n
== 1:::-
1 ......
::::
(
FUND NO 91~9 -Jl DIST WORKING CAl 1 ITAL P~OC(SSINb O~TE 10/031~0 PAG(
RlPORT NUMBER AP43
\IARRANl NO.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR~NGE COUNTY
VENDOR
ADVANCED CLCCTRONICS
Alll CALIF ORN IA
AIH P~ODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC!
AHfRJCAN CYANAKID COHPANY
AMERICAN SCJENJIFIC PRODUCTS
~"uooo co., 1~c._
THf. ANCHOR PACKiNG CO.
ANIXTt:R PttU2AN
ARBOR NURSERY. . .
ASSOCIATED OF LOS ANGELES
AUlo Sttof [GUJPHCNT co.
A Vt: ft Y . l AP fL . . . ___ . ... . . __ ..
BANCROFT-~HITN£Y CO•
BANNING BATTERY CO.
BAHNE~. & O[LA.Nty ___ ...... .
DECKMAN INSTRUMENTS
JOHN G. BELL CO.
8E~Z ENGhn~tR.IN<!.e_lN~ .• --··· ··-·--···---··
JAH£S MNZJE
BLUE S(AL LINEN SUPPLY
~Of1"ft HAGNr.TO. St:ftYICE.a._ H~C.1
BRANDEL HECHANICAL, INC.
lil.C. OROOKE
BUlHR PHllNttRHHh INC! ...
CS COHPANY
CTA•S lRUCK DRIVER SCHOOL
CALGO~ CQ~PORATl~N
CLAJHS PAID 10/08/80
AMOUNT OfSCR I Pll ON
..
5196.00 ELECTRONIC PAGER REPAIRS
$2~~.oo AIR FARE
i~ql,725,60 CONTRACTOR P2-23-2
$~1282•63 CHEMICALS
$2~5.62 LAB SUPPLIES
,l,lQ&,p5 ·-ENGINE R~PAIRS
$108.70 ENGINE PARTS
$423.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
$530,00 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
$584.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
S68D•52 HYDRAULIC JACK
~~~2!!0~ -· ______ OFFICE SUPP.L.IES.
$583.00 PUBLICATIONS
S~~.29 T~UCK BATTERl~S
H~~·f!J . BEARING. SUP.PLIES
S795.70 CONTROLS
$313.44 ENGINE PARTS
_ ... .U'h' ~-_ ...... -··-·-.ruttr rARn ·-· ..
Sl74.60 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
S75.00 TOWEL RENTAL
.... ~llh~~ .. . ... rYHP ft~rAIRS.
$4,218•22 CONTRACTOR PW-066-2
Sl5.~0 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
-··· .12h7.Q'h~s . ···-·----~HGB, P1-n-:-~ •. n-il-:-§ •. n-~~
S505.68 VALVES
S450.00 TRAJNING COURSES
~~77!00 C"£HICAL~
s1.113.86 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
(
051854
051855
051856
051857
osusn
C5185q
05 ll\60
051861
051862
051863
05ltt6't
O~lt!65
051866
051867
051860
051869
051870
05167J
051872
051873
051BH
05Hs75
051876
051871
051870
051679
051880
051881
051882
051883
05188'1
05188!>
0518116
051687
051881\
051889
051890
05USIJ1
05189?
051893
o51a911
051895
0518%
051897
051896
05Ht99
CAMPBELL HEATING a AIR CONDITIONING
JOHN C~ROLLO ENGINEERS s21.3&2•67 ENGR. P2-24, CONST. P2-24, 0 & H P2-24
~O~N CAROL~P ENG/GR~£~~y HAN~£H
CASTLE CONTROLS, INC•
CHEVRON u.s.A., INC.
CO~ST ffR~ ~QU(~H~NJ .
COAST INSURANCE AGENCY
CQLJCH & SONSt ~ JOINT VENTURE
~9~Hi~c~ ~TATIQN~~s ~~P. f61"T~~s CQRr~
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST.
CONTINENTAL tHCHICAL CO
COSlA HfSA. AUTO P~~T~t INC,
HR. CRANE
OEK/ELECTRO, INC.
OAH.Y PILOT
DAYLIGHT TttANSPORT INC.
DICK SONS
NJ~K DlOOVlC ANP ~,~,·ZAR~OJ~A.
TH£ ORAUJNG BOARDe INC•
~3,~6-h68. . .... o ~ t1 Pi ·B, CQHST. r2.:Zl
Sl&0.31 VALVES
S209.88 PAINT SUPPLIES
s28.?2 FIRE ~XTIHGYISijfft HAINT~NAHC~
S482.00 1USURANCE PREHIUH
$70,672.85 CONTRACTOR 5-21-1, 5-22
s~!~3 •. __ _ .... Off.ICE ~UP.PLlf;S
$7q0.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
$59,60~.52 CHLORIN~
~5~~2~ . TRUCK PARTS
s531.00 CRANE RENTAL
$39.42 tfflCE SUPPLIES
Sll~l? SPE,lflCATIQH ~:IQS ~~GAL "PV~RTISIH~
S49.14 FREIGHT
S636•00 AIR CONDITIONER
Sl2~1~93.00 CO.HTRACTQ~ 3-Z.2-3
S237.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES
.......
I I.
I I ..
I
! .
! .
.I
I"
..
I•
i ·:
I
!
1·
. .,
I
I .
i.
I
:i: f lJNO NQ ~
I
N ::::
\.IARRANT NO.
051900
051901
05190;?
051903
05190/t
051905
051906
051907
)> D5190U
G> 051909 rn :z: 051910
t:::j 05l'Hl
j> 051912
051913 ........
-t 0519llf
rn 0519l!l
3 051916
:::.t: 05)911
00 051911\
051919
I 051'>20
J:> 051921
I 05192?.
I 05192J
05192't
t::J 051925
i--t
(./) 0'31926
-t 051927
;u 051928
i--t 051929
~ 051930
(/.) 0511J31
051~3~
05193.?.
05193'1
05t935
051936
051937
051CJ3U
051939
0519/tO
0519/tl
051942
051943
• j 0519't't
0519't5
I
:::
I>
I
...,)
:::: (
9)~' -JT PJ~T ~P~KINP CAPITA~ PROCESSING' OAT[ 10/03/60 PAGE
.[PORT NuMDER.AP't3 .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAJMS PAfO 10/08/60
VENDOR
DUNN COWARDS CORP.
£.O.A.Uet INC.
EA$TMMh me~
ENCHANTER, INC.
[QUI NO x-HALJ OU
EQUINOX -HALJl)U
~i~~~~·ioN~~~ii-co;
fl 0-SY STE HS
~~1ff9R0 A· fORKERT_
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAHCRA
FoxnORO HUNJCIPAL SALES, INC.
A~ft fpf;Y .. . ... ···--·· ..... _. ____ .. ·--·--··
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
GOULD, INC.-MARREN & BAILEY
G~PTH ~"EV~OLET ~n~ .
HAAKER [QUJPffENT cO.
GEORG[ T. HALL CO.
L.A~RV. ttHb~~ _ . --···
HOLLYMOOO TIRE Of ORANGE
HONE YW[LL, l NC.
ttOvst 9f .UA TT£~ H ~ .... . . ·-·
UOUARO SUPPLY CO.
HUNDLEY COHPANY. INC.
CHY. Pf Hl•.~H N~_T PN. P.~ ~~11 . _____ . -··. . . . _ . -···
flUtll lNGTON SUPPLY
J.H.H. ENTERPRISES
K Cf;N AN PI Pf: ~ SlJPPb.Y .t.9 ! --·
KCLCO SALES l £NGINC[RJNG CO.
KING DEARING, INC.
KLC£N-LJNE CORP
k~rii ·1~6li~TRj~[-sup~[~cs
L.u.".s., 1,.,c.
~AU~~~N CO~OR LAP.
LlfTZAU PATTCHNS, INC.
HAHKSON SCIENC[ INC.
HATT -~~LOR, '~~!
MCCALLA BROS. PUHP & DRILLING
HCHAST£R-CARR SUPPLY CO.
Hl~E SAFETY Ap~~l~NCES ~Q.
HORGAN [QUJPH£NT co.
HULTJQUfPt INC.
CITY Of NEMPORT BEACtl
Nonoco PRODUCTS -·
NOTTINGHAM PACIFIC CO.
OC~AN SA~T co,~ ~N~~
ORANGE TOOL HART
AHOUNT
s.302. ss
'"•716.60 o ,210.oa s3,sno.oo
1221680.21
.f.'15,621.00 · · iiiHi:oo
$316.79
s~,0?9'!50
$300.35
'3"3.81
s't't .ao ----·-···· ··-$~l)Q;2f
S.582.25'
$77.00 u ,399:86 ·
S791.28
.. ~6.~.!~Q
S755.l5
$157.49
s57.28
$ 1 • 3 ci 3 • 9 1 ···
S576e't5
$9.31 . ----.. . . ·,c,92~ 96.
..
S236.78
S'\50.29
-·· $80;02
$380.45
$317.58
. ··-·s691 :a6
Uel68e29
. !305~28
Sltl69.0
S56.76
S638.55
s21,a5•.96
$10.45
$6 I .17
$176.68
S't9el9
ss.oo
$132~93
S7't.20
$25'h 07
S't;il't.00
DESCRIPTION
PAINl" SUPPLIES
EIR BJG CANYON
(>ff ,Cf: $LIPPLI~~
OCEAN HON ITOR I NG
CONTRACTOR Pl-3-2, PW-073
~ONTR~CTO~ rw-07~
CONTROLS
PUHP PARTS
~~RY~Y r~-;3~§. s-~~
FILH PROCESSING
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
EHPLOVEE MILEAGE tf i.e PHONE .. ---·· .....
GAUGES
TRUCK PARTS
MANHOLE COVER LIFTERS
CONTROLS
TRUCK REPA'R'S titlitK T fRES ..
STRIP CHARTS
BATTERIES
PiPE .. SUPPLIES
CONTROLS
WATER USEAGE . ·si1Ai[ HARDWARE ...
SHALL HARDWARE
PIPE SUPPLIES
RUBBER PRODUCTS
BEARING SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TOOLS -. -·-· ... --. ··-·
WELDING SUPPLJES
FILtt PROCESSING PUMP PARTS -. . .
LAB SUPPLIES
CONTROLS
CONTRACTOR E-090
SHALL HARDWARE
DETECTOR TUBES
TRUCK PARTS ..
TRUCK PARTS
WATER USEAGE
TRUCK PARTS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
SALT SUPPLIES
BAN'DSAW HOTOR
?
-
(
"' . ....
. :::
:t>
I
\.N :::
)>
G'> rn .. ._.. s
J>
........
--4
rT1
3
::s:t::
00
)> .--.--
t=' ..__.
(./')
~ :::;o ........
~
(./')
::: :;,-:::.
I .
\.N :::
(
FUND NO 9JY~ -JT DIST ~ORKlNG CAPITAL PROCESSING 0~1£ 10/P3/QO PALE
R[PORT NUH8[R AP~3
3
WARRANT NO.
0519't6
0519"7
05 l 9't n
05l9't9
051950
05)95t
051952
0~195!1
0519~q
051955
051956
051957
0519511
05195~
0 5t 960
051961
051962
05196~
Q5196't
051965
05l'j66
051967
05t91>tt
0~1969
051970
051971
05197?
051973
05191'1
051975
051976
051977
051978
05197CJ
0519HO
051981
051982
05t9R3
05198't
051965
051986
()5t987
051988
05198')
0519'JO
0519')1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIO lO/Oslao
VlNOOR
ORANGE VALVE & f lllJNG CO.
OXYGfN SERVJCC
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT~ Of ORANGE COUNTY
PACJFJC TfLCPHONE
PARAHOUNT cou1PH[NT RENTAL ANO SALES, INC.
PA~GAS __ ·-
PEAT, HARYICK, HJTCHELL & co.
PENN&1ALT CORP.
C. NORMAN PETERSON co. C9.~TP.
PICKMICK PAPER PROOUCTS
PIONEER CONSULTANTS
f.ITNtY.OOMCS ·-·· ..•. ··-··-··
HAROLD PRIHROS( ICE
PRKACIN cO. ANO RUNJ[ CORP.
lti[ RADIATOR f ACTOBY ...... . rnr RCGJST£R
AHOUNT
S52.15
~56.70
'11668.Alt
U07.38
$151.05
~~0:$~5?
s6,s22.oo
Sl77.89
$53'tt~l5.'t0
1523.26
u,aH.11
..... IHtf>Ll
S2o\.OO
s226,t25.oo
~u~, 5P
s221.10
S't,CJOOeOO S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG., INC.
SArrn OOLLAft OUU.Nl:::ss. Fo.BJ:\~ .. -··--.
S(E OP lJCS --· -· ····----. -. ----~~,.!i~~f>
$32.60
SttALLER & LOHR, INC•
StlA~RQtJ( SUPPL l ....•. ---·· ····--·-···· ...... _____ ·-__
SttrR" IN WILLI AHS
SILVERI & RUIS CONST. CO.
SHtTtl:-f.MERY co~ -.... -· ·-H.c. SMITH CONSTRUCTION co.
SOUTH ORANG( SUPPLY
SOUTH£RN C~~lf ! CP.ISQN CQ•
SO. CALIF. WATCR CO.
SOUTHERN COUNTIES Oil Co.
$0UTliPQ~l £0~HPt1.EtH (;~~-~ ! .
SOUTHWEST FLCXJBLE SEWER r.ourp
SPARKLETlS DRINKING WATER
STAf\0~ Sl~El-
STC UAR 1 COHPANY
SUPfR CHCH CORP
SVF(R VACV~~ Mf~• ~9!1 IN~!
SUPERINTENDENT OF OOCUHENJS
TH( SUPPL lrRS
J, ~AYN~ SYLV~STC"
1.A.T. £NGINCCRING CORP.
Tf I HATERJALS-INJ•L., INC.
T AYLOR-OUtJN
TAYLOR INSTRUHENTS
TROJAN OATT[RllS
·~uCK & AUTO surp~y, INC.
u.s. RENHLS
'21630!00
. -·. _$:$~6..7Q
s5R6.lf O
Ut186.89
__ l?.1~81),QO ..
no6 i6n. oo
$208.81t
.n~,s6Q!1?..
,7.60
$l3•77't.70
-~~ Q't. 92
u,121.a1
$298.55
s.3,653!~1
$21.32
S11618.62
Sl8.35 -··147;00
Slt2JO.OO
t:3l?f>.94
$116.25
S157•'t3
$/t08!~6
S27.8't
$260.28
~357"16
$26'1•00
OESCR I PTI ON
PIPE SUPPLIES
DEKURRAGE
REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND
TELEPHONE
TRUCK PA~TS
ENGINE PARTS
1979-80 AUD IT
ENGINE PARTS
CONTRACTOR P2-2~~1
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
DRILL & TEST 11-13-2
rQ$TA~~-HETfft_sueeLIES
INDUSTRIAL WASTE SA"PLING ICE
CONTRACTOR 2-21
TRUCK REPAIRS
LEGA~ ADVERTl$1NG P2-23-6, P2-25
GEAR BOX REPAIRS
QfflH. $YPrl-J~$
SAFETY GLASSES
ENGR. 5-12-2
LU PR I CANT
PA I NT SUPPLIES
3-21-1 REPAIRS
····-HHIH'i 11-:13-i
CONTRACTOR P2-23-6
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
POWER
WATER USEAGE
DIESEL FUEL
~~AR Q!H< rARTS .
PUMP REPAIRS
BOTTLED WATER
HEU. noel{
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SOLVENTS
fL~CTRIC.HQTO& rABT~
PUBLICATIONS
TOOLS
P~TTY CASH RglHPM8SEH~HT
PUMP RENTAL
PIPE SUPPLIES
TRUCK P/\RT~
CONTROLS
TRUCK BATTERIES
TRUC~ PAfHS
EQUIP.HEtfT, RENTAL
(
I,
i.
J .
. :;
:J> FUND NO I . q)~9 -~· pJSl uo~~I~~ CAP.JAL PROCESSING DATE 10/0j/bO PA~(
REPORT NUMOER AP~3 ..
.J::' :;
'j
I
)>
G') rn •. :=-a
:J>·
t-t
-I rn
3
==!t:
00
I
:A> .--.--
t::1 ........
(/.)
--1 :;c
~
n
--1
(/.)
:;
:i>
I
.J::' :;
IJARRANT 1110.
051992
051993
05l99't
051995
05J9'Jf.
051991
051998
051999
(l52PPO
052001
052002
Q52003
05200/t
(
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANG[ COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/Q0/80
VCNUOf<
UN1T£0 PARCEL S£RV1CE
UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT CO•t INC.
V~R st1tNTlfl~ .
VALLEY CJTJCS SUPPLY CO.
JOHN R. MAPL[S
~~lrR P9~LMTION.CQNJ~Ql. f~P~RATIQff
WAUKESHA ENGINE £ERVICENTER
V(~T[RN ~HOLCSALE co.
~HJfEt f1N£ ~ V~RVILL[
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
XEROX CORP.
G~~m Gf .. Y ~RDtPL~~~9JI Hf~
ZIP TEMPORARY PFRSONNCL
lOTAL CLAIMS PAID J0/08/80
SUMMARY
12 OPER FUND
12 f /R 'FUND-
13 OPER FUND
13 f /R FUND
#5 OPER FUND
//5 ACO FUND
#5 f /R FUND
116 OPER FUND
#7 OPER FUND
# 11 OPER FUND
#11 ACO FUND
115&6 OPER FUND
115£6 SUSPENSE FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND .
JT. OPER FUND
CORF
SELF-FUNDED WORKERS 1 COHr.
JT. WORKING CAPITAL FUND
TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 10/08/80
FUND
AHOUNT
$15.38
s.-\23.25
~1,n1.11
$~31.29
$225·50
~90!()0
SI 1078.88
1H.68
'2,58fJ!OQ suo.oo
131'130.'\0
$350.14 .... i~4 t ~60
·1213001337.'J't ----------------------------------
AMOUNT
$ 51.37
··-226,146·.50
lt,]ltl.11
125,893.00
··-3 t 865. 05
4,716.60
68,508.27 .. ·-....... 15. 30
5,459.2U
2~479.94
·s.221t. 11
. 47. 97
7. 4 77. 58
. 2,037.12
173,496.45
1,631,325.42
··1,66ts.84·
37,583.1t3
$2,300,337.94
OESCRIPllON
DELIVERY SERVICE
COHrRESSOR PARTS
LAB SUPPL I ES
PIPE SUPPLlES
ODOR CONSULTING
CONfE~EHCE REGl$.TRATIDN
ENGINE PARTS
GENERATOR PARTS
l.EGA~ SERVICE$
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
XEROX REPRODUCTION
(;All~~~
TEHPORARY ttELP
It
I I
i:
~ ·'.
. ,\
I
I
I·
( .,,
I ~
to
I t-a ::::
::t>
G>
1'"11 :z
t:j
:&>
..........
-I_ .,.,
3
:::.t::
00
J> .-.-
t::j ..........
(/')
-j
~ ..........
("""')
-j
(/)
::::
tX1
I
~ ::
(
FUNO NO YlY~ -Jl OIST YORKIN~ CAf·lTAL P~OC£SSJNG DATE 10/21/HO ~AG[
PE~ORT ~UMAEV APqj
-~OUNTY 'SANITAllON OJSTRICTS OF ORANG£ COUNTY
CLAJHS PAID 10/22/~0
WARR/INT NO. Vf.NGOR . -·. AHOUNT .. -. . •. OESCR I PTI ON
os:>olb ~OVANCC £L£CTRlCAL SAL£S, l~C. l~1.8A ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
05;>01£, AOVANC[O [L[CTRONICS . . t.o\O.Of. ... PAGER REPAIRS
052fi17 AH(RJCAN CYANAMIC COtWAfl:Y U6,:>16.'11 CHEtUCALS
Of,?(llU t.HrHICAN SCJrNtJFlr f'fWl>UfTS s.150.73 LAB SUPPLIES
O~?Cll'l AHCRICAN SOCIETY 'FOR.HICROBIOLOGY -· -.. --. "J90·.oo . --· ... -TECHNICAL JOURtfALS
052020 /.N(;t< UI s I NOUSTll I t.l UAl<DUAR E no. Olf TOOLS
052021 ANIXTER PPU/AN Sl86e1~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
('
ll52on JOllN A·.--·ARTUKOVICH ·g SotJS• lNC -. .. ....... f.21\9,311.58 ·---·. ----CONTRACTOR ·11-·13-2;·EHERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS
ASSOCIAJfO Of LOS ~NGllf$ $lt025.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES r.~2023
05,·0?'I AUTO Sl•OI· (UUJM-![NT er.. :a,6Ao.52 HYDRAULIC JACK
-· 052G2!>
05202l
{1~2027
DACKfTf.\l PRf V[NTJ ON-·orv J CE"... .. ... _.. ·-·--·--· -·-·---····-·-u-t"J6"9 0 o----·--·--·---eACKtTOW DEVI' CE-'TESHNG ....
0A~K Of 4M£PICA NT & SA Sl10"5.27 VARIOUS TRAVEL EXPENSES
OAHNfS & D[LANfY l761.08 GEAR PARTS
05?(l2fi
o5cO?"
. Of[RLY' .. & ·~ssocuTEs.-INC~"-·-··-·-· ...... ·--·----·. ·----· ··$qOO.oo ..... _ .. _.WORKERS' 'COMP; ADMINISTRATOR
OLUC OIAMONO H~TERIALS ~lf7.82 ASPHALT SUPPLIES
(15.::·03b ~OYLC [NGINlERlNG CORP i9,l61.00 SURVEY 3-22-2 AND 3-22-3
·052031-
05203:>
lSROl1AffT9-· H~C. -·· -·-----·-· _ ... _____ ·····-.. ·---.. ····--·. -·------n1•·13-----· . _ .. _·-·off ICE. SUPPLfEs·-..
C t R llfCONDJTIONJNG CO. $390.00 PUMP REPAIRS
0520.53 CS COMPANY t659.72 PUMP PARTS
05;>03't CAL JFOPN I A . p ~tlrl-'l -vrurrP. ··--·· ... ·-. ·-·. . -. -. --· --···. ·n·e .76. ---..... ---·-PANEL ING'-.
0!'.~0~!:. CALJFOHNIA SPHOUTING CO. $5.50 PERHIT OVERPAYHENT REFUND
0520~(: CALOLyMJC GLOVE & SAFrtv l346·3~ SAFETY SUPPLIES
052037 ART CARR"lfU'NStfTSSfON" .• ·-·-· -... -... _ ... --·-. ··-· -··--u-00·,70-··--·-.. ·---TRUCK-REPA'IRs--·-··--.. -·-----·-.... -
0~;>030 CARRIER CLEARING SCRVICf Sl6.~5 FREIGHT
0 5~ 03'J C.lt[VRON u.s.A., INC. t.5,086.00 ENGINE OIL
052!l'lD
il5201t 1
"lL LIA,.,. N. er AICK r--·---. ------... ···-·-..... -" . -·-----··--·, l 95. 2s-··· .. ---. ---yp:c·f-. E'XPENSE s-__ ,. . -. --~--. -·
COAST CHEMICAL f104.98 LAB CHEHICALS
~~·2lllti'
05;>04j
05;>C'tlf
COLL CG[ lU,.HlCR CO.• I NC• $8 7 • 't5 LUMBER
. rllHHLR ce--sTAT I OtsERs -A·tJo-r" l'NTERS' CORP; ----·---··---·--$82• :sr--· ·------oFn CE ... S'UPPL"I Es--·--·--------·---·_ ... -------
CONSOL JO AT Eb ElECT~lCAL Ol~T. $681.3~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
0!120't5
. O~:»O'H>
CONSOLJOAlED REPROOUCTIO~S S689e65 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
CMJTlNfNTAL.CHEKICAL' co.,_ .... ·--··· -· . ·-·. -. -i211;301-.·n .. ·--------.. -·-cHLORTNE'-··----· .. ···---··----·--· ........ --..
0 520"7
0520H
CONVfRS[-~ARO-DAVlS-OlXON,JNC• !2,-054.00 TESTING P2-2~-l
to51A Y£SA AUTO PARTS, JNC. iA8•&3 TRUCK PARTS
Ii 5~ l!lt ~ cnsr11 ~ES~ UATSUN ...... ·----·-----··-·----·-· '6-J-.97" ··--·-··-·-··TROC'K-'PARTs·-· ·---... ·-·-----·-·-
0!)2fJ5n
052U51
P52C!5r-·
(15?0'.l:a.
!)~,;>l•t't
MK. CRAN[ $lt593.00 CRAN~ RENTAL
TO~ OAUf S $205.tt' WPCF EXPENSES
Ort 1r. r.ONSTRUCTlON .. CO-., .. JNr• .... -·-----·-·· -SltOCJt ... oo--·. -... ···--··HANHOlE .. COVElf""REPAll\S·-:.;-DISTRICT 113
ouru1 SYST(tts. INC. U57·50 KINI-COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES
OElP.A l'USJtJfSS HACUINfS '40.00 TYPEWRITER REPAIRS
O~?O!>fl
0!>?.05f.
f\52957
ni;2oef!
052u5c;
our1N ruw~nos conr·--·---·-· -...... · ·-·-··--·-· ·-·· -· .. ·--··· t6,•19--· --· ..... __ PA'INT··suPPUES---.. -·-··-·--·----·-· ·
(CO AJ~ PROUUCTS $92~31 ELECTRICAL SU~PLIES
E.fJ.A.1.&1.,· INC. :f·'ft517.UO EIR -BIG CANYON
f ,, s T fol u~ t l N c • . . .. .... _ .. -..... _ .. ·-.. --· -. ... ·-. -... -..... -·-. .. . -.. 15 ') 5 ; ] ~ . --. . . .. ··-· ...... -0 FF I er-supp ['I E s ....... __ .. ---· -
rLfCTKlC EEL Hf G. co., l~C. i308.5~ CABLES
£J5;>06[. f l~CHf~ ! PO~Tfh co. i1so.2R PIPE SUPPLIES
.,
::
t:d
I
N ::
l>
::J> ,,
~ :::s ]:> .. _
.......
-I .,,
::s:
~
X>
t>
:::1
--t
/)
H
:0
-4
I .....
I)
:::
j
)
::
fl•tW 1'110
UAR R /11\: T I'~ 0 •
0!>20f)
O!:>?Of.2
O~?C6~
£15206,.
0520&~·
0520n6
052061
"05:?060
U52(J(.4
o5207f,
l!!>2071
(152072
(1!>2073
0520H
C\52075
052£17£.
052017
fJ5~1 07fS
05ii07''
Cl5r'Ol!C
(t b::' Olt J
05201\~
0!»21JP.j
05:-'0Vt
r1s:>rau5
O~;">(lflf
052087
1152oc~ n
C!5?0U&J
05211'.lQ
c• t>t' o·n
0~·2f'l92
C0520'U
o!':;onlf
l'5209!i
l)f:20%
052097
os~n~o
05~·(Jr,~J
05~ l OG
Ob2101
osno2
052103
o5noq
o~n C!)
052106
'l)l)CI -JT lilSl l.ICRl'.Jt.I[, CAPITAL PHOC(SSJNG OATf 101211eo l'Al~l
RlPORT NurorP Af ~3
COUNTY ~ANJTAllON UJSTNICTS OF ORANGE COUNlY
CLAIHS PAID 10122180
-·· V l Nl>UH ·· ··· · AHOUNT. (ll~SCHll'1 ION· ..
f LO-SY~TEHS tlD6.05 IHPELLER PARTS
FLYING llGFflS LIN(S S.30'l.7CJ . FREIGHT
f OOTHILL Ff(~ co. $5'19.10 HOWER PARTS
CLJFFO~b A. Fo~~ERT S3t~81.50 SURVEY P2-23-6. 5-22
tomnArn "VALL'CY CA~lr.·A·----·-·-.. .... ·····. ······-·--·-U13"iU3 ·• .. flLH PROCESSING
EDUARD R· fkANCIS ia~.oo ~HPLOYEE MILEAGE
fR[fa.1Ay ttACtllNf & \l[LOJNG $166.95 WELDING SUPPL,ES
·cf lV -of fULURTON . . .. . -. . $')1.0lH ..... ··-.... WATER USEAGE" . ·-·-···
GAIN(S tL£CTPIC SUPPLY co. \168.53 WIRE SUPPLIES
G[U(~Al £L£CTRIC co. $11611.60 BLOWER SHAFT REPAIRS
Grr~t:RAl u:u:a-HON"C--co-··· ·-·-----·· -···---·------·--... ·-··---·n·,23·"···12·· -----·--TELEPHONE ..
ti-Cl HJSlRUfHNT CCiHPANY UO't.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
trAAK(R lOUJl'MfNT co. U99.98 TOOLS
tlACU Ctl[HICAl ·co. -·-···-·-· ---·· .. --··. ·-·-·· ····-·· ···-f.265952" "LAB SUPPLIES
G[Ol<G( T. HAU co. f.52.65 'CONTROLS
tUUL-AUAY COUAINlf(S 1.385.00 TRASH DISPOS~L
HrRTZ"fAP-1.:CASIN'G 01vr·s10,..,.--:··· -·-----·--····-·--·----$6,91'1•"05'• -·-··-·--· AUro··•L£ASlNG"" -· ·--· ..
HOLLYMOOD Tlk£ Of O~ANGF SR0.75 TRUCK TIRES
HON[YUELL• INC. Sl43.18 STRIP CHARTS
'HOm:f'""Cf HATTER1rs-. ··---······ ..... ·-·· ··---.. ··--···---·--·· .. ·--·-uo·9-~3· . . ......... BATTERIES .. .
~OUARO SUPPLY co. t266.89 PIPE SUPPLIES
R.S. HLGH[S co., INC. $66.13 SHALL HARDWARE
2
-ttuNf•L[T tOHPAlllYi" · urc··--·-·... . ... --·-. ----·--·· .. ----· $0~--o~ . ··--. -·-·---ELECTfU"CAL" SUPPa:ns--· -··--··· ··-. -.
CJTr Of ttUNTINGJON fi[ACH \9.6~ WATER USEAGE
INLAND £»PIPf fGUIPHfNT co. $100.20 TRUCK PARTS
"1NSTRUt'fNJ'SOCH'TY ·or··AHER.JCA .. ·--··--··-···· ·····-··-·t26e"OO . -· .. --···-suBSCRIPTIONs-. ·-. ·--····--···
INTCH[X CORP. t33.83 LAB SUPPLIES
fNTr«NATIONAl fOILS COkP. '99.0~ LAB SUPPLIES
· rnvrnc ·nANC"lt MA·HR··o1STfUCT ··-. -·· --·····-··-···· -··· -· ""$39·20 .. ··---.. WATER" USEAGE .... -··---·-········-·-····
K~MAN f[AklNGS g SUPPLY $)55.82 DEARIN~ SUPPLIES
KEITH 8 ASSOCl~l[S $6,168.00 SURVEY 11-13-2
KftCo ·sAL£S & rNGINrr-~rnG en.--··-·· ·····-·-·-·-·-·$);.581.-·13--··· -···· ·-· COHPRESSOR'"PARTs-···-·--··-·--·· ·-· -··
Klf\iG HEAi<JNGt 1Nr.. s.'t,725.CJl BEARING SUPPLIES
KNOX 11\:l>USTRIAL SUl·PLJES $513.20 TOOLS
L. rs. u; .. s;. • I NC. · --·-.... ····· ·-·· . · · · ---· ·. -··--· · ·--· ---·-·· i5q-.·79· --···-·· · --·wnD I NG-·surPnEs··--··-·····-· ..
LA~HY'S ~LOG. ~AJ[PJALs, •~r. S~B3.1P BUILDING HATERIALS
LOC4l AG£~CY FORMATION COMM $125.UO rROCES~ING FEE A~NEXATION #43
LO'S ANGEL( s· ·cttrH J cAt···co.-. ....... ....... . .. . -.... .. ·-····· ·-· \"?fl>7n·· 01 . ------·-·--·c·Au·sT i c-· SODA ..... ·--··· ---·--···-··-·· .
LO~«t & ASSOCIATES S3,595.90 ENGINEERING 2-5-2
A •• a. LYNCH CO. f 575 • 7 2 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
HACK lhUCKS, Ifft·;.·· · · ·-·· ·-· ·· ·· --·· ··· · -·· · ·-·· .•..... 'Sfi'J•26. ·---··--··-·ft RE. EXTl'NGUIStJER.
OCNN1S KAY $1?..00 EMPLOYEE ~ILEAGE
MCCALLA OROS. ~UHP K ORILLJNG 1~62.11 PUMP PARTS.
Mc MAliA w·cf SIC Of. COST A . Mf SA'-· • . . . .. ---· -.. ..... . ...... , 3')6 •'14· -·. -·. ··-· Of FI CE"'fURN ITURE .• ··-·-· .... .
HCttA~TlR-CARR ~UPPL~ co. $1~6.78 SHA~~ HARDWARE
KJTCll(ll IUNUAl s, INC. ·····-'-~~-~-".~ ······ ... -·! nc_~~ICA.L JOURNAL
(~ ( -··
:::
b:t
I
~ :::
:-?>
G"> rn
·~ t-3
~'>
......... -c rn :·:s:
~
:)()
]>
:::J .....
'/)
-I
:0 ......
I
-I n
:::
lj
,.,.
:::
{ (
FUNO NO 914Y -JT PlSl ~Ok~IN~ C-fJTAL Pl~OCESS1Nf: Of1lE 10/2)/fHl rAGE
RfP~Rl NUMBER AP'f3
j
'COLJN'TV S/aNJTATION MSTRlCTS OF ORMJGr·r,oUl\iTY. ,··· -··
CLll~S PAIO 10122/ttO
IJARR.'\NT ~o. V£Nll01\. .. AMOUNT ···-. . -nrscr 1 PTT ON --
052107 NAT10NAL LUH~[k SUPPLY S3fi9.09 SHALL HARDWARE
05:.>100 NATIOtJAL HCUNJCAL INFORMATION t27.00 PUBLICATIONS
ll!>.210'1 NO~UCO pROouc1s $33-10 TRUCK PARTS
052110 OR,NG[ COUNlY AUTC PAHTS CO. t~05.09 TRUCK PARTS
(1 5:?111 ORANC£ "TOOL HAf!T. . • . ····· .... -· .. .. . . . .. 1184.19" ... ··-· .... "HEIGHT ...
osn l? a~vG£N S[HYIC[ i92.52 SPECIALTY GASES
05C:l l 3 COUNTY SANITATION OJST~JCT Of ORANGE COUNTY f9D0.57 REPLENISH WORKERS' COHP. fUND
05211 q R. o. FARMAN. ·-· ... . . . ... . .... n10.u· -· -··-····EHPLOYfE Hl°LEAGE"···· --.. ···· ..
05~1 H' PAP TS UNL IHI J[f1 U65. H TRUCK PARTS
05?1 lf. P(£hSo~s LA~NHO~fR C[NTf~ i336·50 HOWER ENGINE ... 0~2117 .. P£AJ, f'ARli!ICt<t" .. HITCttELL" r·rn. ········-·-·-.. -··--····-·--i11;'300•oo-·-··----··-···ANNUAL.AUDIT
f'5211A PfRGAMON PkCSS, JNC• $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION
05;:> 11 'J
0~212()
PION(£* CONSULTANTS i~S3.50 TESTING 11-13-2
POl.LARt•s· VULCl.NIZING ~fRVJCr-·· . . .... ··-·. -······ ·---$256900 .. PIPE REPAIRS
(.f2121 POSTNASlfR tt,000.00 POSTAGE
05212? tlAi{Ol.fl PRl~l\OSl lCf $2't.OO INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAHPLING ICE
'052123 RAHIE!O!.f OlSPOSAl:' .. CO;-··-·---·-·. ····-···· --·-. ··-····-·--··· ·---···n2o;oo-·-·· ··-·-·-·· "TRASH. DI SPOS'AL. -..... .
0~2J2't
{152125
RICttAno RANDALL i10.20 EHPLOYEE HILEAGE
Ttl( U£6JSTEP .int3.DO CLASS If IED ADVERTISING
Cl52JU: Rrll£f PRINTING r.o;···· .. -·· ·-· ····----·---·--... ··-· "77•'1l'-·------·"-BUSINESS"CARDS"
0~2127
05212A
R[YNOLU ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. i676.8't ALUHINUM SUPPLIES.
RtfUJf t.Jf~. INC. !751•92 POWER FAN
· C5212'J SANTA" ANA "OOOGC"' .. ··-···-····· ·--····. --·-. -•.. ·-····•"• -···--.. ----,n···o.,-·-·· -·--···--··TRU.CK .. PARTS. ·-·· ··-·-~···
(•52130 CITY Of SEAL P.EACll U5tl.50 WATER USEAGE
0~2131
05;']3?.
05n33
SHALLCI• & LOHR, JNC. s.7t310.00 ENGR. 6-8. ENGR. 5-12-~, SURVEY 5-21-2
St1At1R0CK"SUPfLY ___ . ..... . .. ·-· ----... -·---···-.. n't:?.97 ··----·-·TOOLS --......
Sftf PliAf<U MACttfN[tlY CO. H 11t690.92 TRUCi< PARTS
o~.21;)11 StlffCUJN Will IAMS l7R3.55 PAINT SUPPLIES
05213e.
t.521.Sf,
0~2137
csn :rn
C:5~·Dll
SLAOD[t\ -E'NG 1 NEER J NG··-· -.. .•.. ...... . .. -. ··--·-·· ---··-.. --... -··-····i9ao.-oo· ··-·--·-·-· TE'ST rNG--2~r· -··-··---· -. --·-·-··-.. ... . .
SHJlU-fHF~Y co. 1.560.00 TESTING 11-13-2
sH11tt-MA~RY Co. S731.40 PUHP PARTS
so. COAST./!.tR"OUAUTy··HANAGEHENT.DISTRICT" ····-·-·· tlSO•OO ··-·-··--·--·sETTLEMENT"OF-·su1r··-·-·
SOUTH OHANG[ SUPflV t2t.65 PLUHBING SUPPLIES
f! 5;~ l't (J SOUllt(f\N f.ALJF. EOISON CO• s.1371895.0l POWER
r5~1't l
(l~21'12
052llf3
0521 'flt
so• CAL• GAS Co.-· ·-·-•··. ... . . -·• ·-· · -$2 ;n·1 .. 31.. ··-··-····-NATURAL-GAS -. · ········ -·-·-·
so. CAllf. lfSTJNr. LAB i257.57 TESTING P2-2)-6
SPAHKlf.lJS llf<JHKHJG \lltTlR 1526.q'l BOTTLED· 'WATER
STAROIJ srrn· -.. ........ . .. ··-·... . . .. . ..·-·-· ........ -·i7'>R•07' ...... -··--···sTEEL .. STOCK-·-····--.. -·-.. ---··-···
0~~1'•~· Tttf SUPPLICl<S U1'f'tl.6l ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
0~2lH J. ~AY~E SYLVfSTfP i6A7.12 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEHENT
0521/H
0521'tU
o521'fq
0521~C:
TA Yl OH I ~s TRUHrtlTS . ···-· . --. ·--. . -..... -··--s2 8T .1 n ·-··-·-·-... --. HECTR"I CAL '"S.UPPL t.E s --·-·--··-.
T~NytS LOC~ ~ SAff S£RVIC( i142•8't LOCK & KEY SETS
TRANSAMERICA OllAYAlt lNC. $7,767.32 ENGINE TESTl"G & REPAIRS
lRllVfl CIJffS ... ·-· ... ····· -. .... . .. -·····--····-·· ·-·-n~...ao· ····-·--··-·····-·vARIOUs··AIKTARn··--· ·-·
~52151
05~·15~
TROJl.N U/ITTU<IES .f.603.46 TRUCK BATTERIES
lRUCK ! AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 143J.l~ TRUCK PARTS
I•
•
I.
I
::;
td.
I ~ fU~JO fJO :::
):>
G')
1"11 .. ,...
t5 :r:a·
.L
+:-i.
ni .. -;ill .. ·..::.
:.i:t::
'?"
I•
:I> r-
~
b
1--t
(/)
-I ::o
1--t
n
-I
(/)
IJllRHllNl NO.
(152153
Q5'15't
0~21!>~
05~'15f.
U52H·1 ·
f!f.21!\A
C5('15S
0~216(i
t\52H 1
{"15~ 16:~
'(!!)?)£,~-·
052tfJ't
Y 1'~ Y -J T fl l S l U 0 IU< I NL C M· IT AL PI' 0 f. t: $ f. I N 6 fJ A Tf l 0 / 2 11 tHl r• A f. J
Rf POR! NU"OC~ AP~3
crurqy SAtillATJ(ll'J IJISTRICTS Of OP.t.NCC COUfl!T\'
···• Vf. Nl!OR ···· ..
J.6. TUfk[~ & SON• INC.
UNION OIL CO. OF C~LJf.
UNllfO PARCfl SCHVlCE
UNlHO STAHS CfWIPMENT Co., INC.
VI.Ill SC JlNTlfl C ·· · -·-· ··-··• .. -·· -
CLAlf.S PAID 10/22/80
···AMOUNT· · ······ -orsckJPTION
f2q3.~0 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
· St•l.11 -GASOLINE. -. ·······--·---
$15·36 DELIVERY SERVICE
~122.HO COMPRESSOR PARTS
u .-7n9.;95 .. LAB SUPPL I ES .
4
CAHL wARH[N & CO. 1~~0.00 SELF-INSURANCE LIABILITY CLAIHS ADMINISTRATOR
UAU~[ShA [NGfNf SEPVIC(Nf[R
UC ~T JN GtlOlJSE Elf r Tl? IC CORP
fHJ SS ELL IJ 0 l D
TliOf-IAS L. ~OO[IRUff
i~oo.01 ENGINE PARTS
53t98t.'JO --ELECTRICAL .. SUPPLIES. ___ .. ,. ..... -·-..
tl~l.OO EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
S~t72H.OO LEGAL SERVICES
Xfrrox·-·coRP;·-··· ·--···-·· -····-···-···. ···-·--···---········-··-·-·$·2·,'197;'10-··-···· ·----~···XEROX .. REPRODUCHON-
ZIP T£HPORAH~ PfRSONNrL
TOTAL CLAIMS PAI~ 10/P2/80
SUHHARY
. ···--·--.. -··-
12 OPER FUND
62 F/R FUND
13 OPER. FUND
13 F/R FUND
15 OPER FUND #5 ACO "FUND ......... -····· ··-·· ·----···--· ..
15 f /R FUND
116 ACO FUND
t552.00 TEMPORARY HELP
$6521501.CJn ----------------------------------
AMOUNT
$ 5.05s.~1
lt,71t6.88 -, · · · · · n . 190: 98
9,361.00
1,lt88.22 ···-···· .. -----,.. 5 ,., : ao· . ·······-··-· -·····---. -·--··------··------............ _. ··-··--··-. --. -.... .
s,399.50
230.00
17 OPER. FUND. -. --· -···· -..... --.. -·· ·-·-. ·---··-.• ·~ .. 3 3 ; 1 0 -··· ....... -.. ·--··-. --------·-·--·-·· --.. -···-··. ----·. --· . . . .... .
17 F/R FUND
/111 OPER FUND
S.50
3,999.32
IJ 11 Aco· FUND .. -··-······ ···-··-· ·-······ .. ·-·····-~---·-·-··206·~187:61t""···· --·-····------······ ------------··
15&6 OPER FUND
#5&6 SUSPENSE FUND JT". OPE R f UND -... -........ ------. -
2.7,3lt5.35
1'373. 00 .... ··-. ·22·0·; 683·: 92. ·-· ·------·--·--------··-·····---···---·· -··-·-·---·····
56,195.82 CORF
SELF-FUNDED
SELF-FUNDED
JT. WORKING
LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 727.00 WORKERs 1 ··cottP: "FUND ..... ···-·-···-·-·--·-·····1,800.sr ···-·---··---·----------·····--·········-··-·--·· ··-····-·······
CAPITAL FUND 30,760.91
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/22/80 $652,501.98
-,---.. -·. ·-· ·---·· . . . ... ·-·····--·-------·-· -·--·--··---··-~· -....... -. -··-·---·· .. ·-·-·---···-· .. -··-···-.. --·-· ... .
::;
td
I ..c::-::: ( ( .. J
"C"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.0.80X8127
t 0844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962·2411
S T A F F R E P 0 R T
-~----~--~---
SEDIMENT REMOVAL FROM SANTA ANA RIVER
In September of· 1980, the·· Board authorized expenditures not to
exceed $62.,..000 for removal of sediment from. the Santa Ana River •.
The sediment is to be used for the on-99ing construction program
within Plant No. 2. This removal was authorized in order to
continue con·struction while. Districts' s.taff negotiated with the
County of Orange for additional sediment to be removed under a
County contract~.
The county opened bids October 20th for' the remov-al of approximately
500, 000 yards of sediment.. The contract provided an option for
the contractor to deliver t~e sediment to the Districts or to keep
it. If the bid price to keep the matexial was lower than the
price to deliver 'it, the. D-istricts had the option to pay the
difference and still take delivery. Th~: Boar.d,.· in accordance
with authorization, approved up to $200,000 to«make up for this
possible difference·. The County plans to award the contract to
the second low bidder due to an irregularity in low bidder's docu-
ments. The contract, as bid, provides 150,000 yards of material
to the Districts at "no cost" (Unit I of the County contract} and
the option to accept the additional 350,000 yards at a District
cost of appr.oximately $0.60 per yard.
Staff recommends that the Districts accept only the 150,000 yards
at "no cost" and has informed the County of Orange accordingly.
A problem still remains with the County contract. As of this
writing, the County has not secured a Section 9 Permit from the
Corps of Engineers. Staff understands that the. Corps of Engineers
may require that the sediment be placed on the beach instead of ·
the options of delivering it to the Districts or ownership by
the contractor. The County does not know·when or if they will be
able to award this contract.
AGENDA ITEM #9Cn) -ALL DISTRICTS "C"
~. 0. SOX 3127 -1084* ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALL!Y 1 CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE OROER GRANT NO. N/A ·-·-·--:~~
c. 0. NO. ____ 1 ____ -=::>:-:-
------·--·-------NT~ACiOR·.:.· . Equinox-Malibu
·B :~· LABORATORY BENCH AND FUME HOOD ADOITIONs._ .. AT. J~EC~.AT.IQN .. i>LA.Fr. .NO .• _). _____ ..... __
------·~---;::;-~ :z;7·.:3 ·--~----· .
. _ -Amcunt of 1:lUs Chanqe Order (ADO> om:mracac -$ · 5 , 6 2 4 • O 7 ·-·------------
_:. _ :._. :._· _ In ~ccordaJ?.c~-~ith ccnt:a.ct provisions, the followinq··-cnanqes in -the: contract-·~
_.and/~;" ... =?~'C:ac:c.: wo~ ___ a:e:. here.by authcri::ed and as c:cmpensation:· therefor, the-fallowinq· .. ·
, adci.;t4-ons to or deductions from the contract price are-hereby approved·.... · ·
The contractor is directed to lower the floor
elevation of ~e gas cylinder storage area and ·
entry ramp, and modify the enclosure fence in
accordance with District instructions for the --~--:
l llmp S1.lill. • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
-= . __ . ~ .. ---_---:
NO TIME EXTENSION -----~----·--------.
Ori gi na J Contract Pr-ice $ 88, 750. 00
-----------------=---·------·-------Pre v. Aut~. Changes $ 0.00 ------------------This Change (ADO) ~ $ 5,624.07
----------------==-
Amended Contract Priee $ 94,374.07
--------------------.. ~----.....,...-........... , __
-------·---· -·· r-d autho~izaticn date: November 12, 1980 Approved·:
EQUJ::NOX-MALIBO
---··-·····-·-··· ,, ________ --~--·-·--·· · ----e-ont rac: or
COUNTY SANliATJON OISiRICTS of
O~ange County, California
.. By .. ----·---··-"-··-"·--·--·----·-· ........ . ________ .................................. ~--~-----===-
Chief Engineer
"D" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "D"
~•[iL __
S & J CHEVROLET
---'--'------· 18605 Studebaker Road/ P. 0. BoXf S'67l>fi'Or1e.1'tt3f 924~ 16767(71f4/5Z3·;z99-,--·
· -· CERRITOS, CA. 90701
----·-... ---· --·-.. -·-
"E"
Oct.30, 1980
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co~ty ··
PO Box 8127
~-·:. ?C?untain Valley,Calif .. 92708 Atten: Mr. Ted Hoffman
Dear Sir:
Our bid of 10-28-80 on Specs on #Al03 was inadverteddly
incomplete; therefore please reject this bid as per this
letter.
Thank you.
-~--··--····-·-··-S & J CHEVROLET
~ __.. t1 .. ,,,,,,..-,
•• : I .,,. ' • ·~ .-I --~. ,< I ~ . ,,.,. -.A ~ .. • _,:" •. c ·} ~(,, ..... ... Le~Anst;~J~--~ ._,, ~
Heavy Duty Truck Salesman
LA:dw
. ----------.. ·-. ------------~--··-·--...... --... -... -----··-
AGENDA .ITEM #9(H)(l) fl.LL DI ST~I CTS "E"
November 3, 1980
024
MEMORANDUM
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester
CouN'TY SANITATION D1srR1ct~
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALJFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.U ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 5"'°·2910
(714) 962-2411
SUBJECT: Bid Specification A-103, Truck Mounted
Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner
Bids ~ere opened at ll:OO A.M. on October 28, 1980, -for furnishing
and delivering one (l) Truck Mounted Hydraulic Sewer Cleaner.
The bid tabulations are as follows:
l.
2.
3.
International Harvester Co.
Anaheim
Southwest Flexible Sewer Equip. co.
Whittier
Crook Company (I.H.C. Cab & Chassis)
Norwalk
3_-A _ Crook Company (Ford Cab & Ch.assisl
(Al.ta.mate Bid)
4. s & J Chevrolet
cerritos
$56,146.05
-56 rl46. OS
61,.686. 70
-61,418.52
27,296.06
The· apparent low bid of $27,296.06 (S & J Chevrolet).·was priced
in~ error._ According to the bidder, the price shown includes the·
cab & chassis only. We have received a letter from S & J Chevrolet
requesting their bid be withdrawn due to the obvious error.
·It _is recommended that the bid from s & J Chevrolet be rejected due
· --to· incompleteness. There is a tie from two compani·es for the lowest
responsible bid. It is further recommended that the award be made
to International Harvester Company for their bid of $56,146.05
_ inpludi_ng sales tax on the basis of their Company location in Orange
County., J
,B~te ,.-amo ~ j ~ /
$65,000.
Ted Hoffman
Chief of Procurement & Property
W.N. Clarke, Superintendent
TH/yh
"F" AGENDA ITEM #9(H)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "F"
"G"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108-W ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
November 3, 1980
026
MEMORANDUM
(714) 962-2411
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester -. ----··-·-·--··---·---····--· -... ..._
SUBJECT: Bid Specification E-110, Trailer
Mounted Air Compressor
Bids were opened at ll:OO A.M. on October 28, 1980, for
furnishing and delivering one tl) Trailer Mounted Air
Compressor.
The bid tabulations are as follows:
1. Sullair Los Angeles
Long Beach
2. Ingersoll-Rand Corp.
Pico Rivera
3. Gardner-Denver/Cooper
Industries Inc.
Whittier
4.-. Mus.tang Equipment Co
Whittier
$ 9,974.60
10,494.00
11,182.64
11, 221.16 .
that the award be made to~sullair Los Angeles
of $9,974.60 including sales tax •.
$12,000.
& Property
Concur,
vn~
W. N. Clarke, Superintendent
TH/yh
AG END,~ ITEM #9 < 1 ) -.~LL DISTRICTS "G"
"H"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-170-2
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4B
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS· OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4B
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange·
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day ~ubmitted to the
Board of Directors by the District's Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made to R. M. SKAMNES for SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE,
CONTRACT NO. 2-14-48, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work
are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for Santa Ana River Int~rceptor Control Gate
Structure, Contract No. 2-14-48, be awarded to R. M. Skamties in the total amount
of $107,358.12, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in
form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That all other bids for said work are her~by rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980.
AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 "H"
B I D ~ A B U ~ A T k 0 N
S H E E T
CONTRACT NO. 2-l4-4B
November 4 , 19 8 O
11:00 A.M.
PROJECT TITLE SANTA ANA RIVER I~"'TERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE .
"._/
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 61,aacr.aa
REMARKS
BUDGET AMOUNT $ ---------
------------------------------------------------------------
l.
2.
CONTBACTOR
R. M. Skamnes
Tustin, CA
Pascal and Ludwig, Inc.
Upland, CA
Hoagland-Artukovich,
A Joint Venture
Lonq Beach, CA
TO'UL BID
$107,358.12
$109,585.00
$119,000.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and
find that the Engineer's Estimate was low and that the low bid is
a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to R. M. Skamnes
of Tustin, California, in the bid amount of $107,358.12 as the
lowest and best bid. 1 / (\
cf)&,w,, f.tl.A v~
I concur with the above recommendation
to award Contract No. 2-14-4B.
Thomas M. Dawes
Deputy Chief Engineer
~· ~s~ef Engineer
II I II AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 II I II
II J"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-171-2
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
EROSION PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Board of Directors by the District's Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made to L. S. HAWLEY CORP. & PAUL HUBBS, A JOINT VENTURE, for SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR EROSION PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR, and bid tabulation and
proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for Santa Ana River Int~rceptor Erosion
Protection, Contract No. 2-14-SR, be awarded to L. S. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs,
a Joint Venture, in the total amount of $153,010.00, in accordance with the
terms of their bid and the prices contained there~n; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in
form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That _all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980.
AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 2 II J"
S H E E T November 4, 1980
11:00 A.M.
CONTRACT NO. 2-14-SR
PROJECT TITLE SANTA ANA RJ:VER INTERCEPTOR EROSION PROTECTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 198,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ -------
REMARKS--------------------------------------------------------------
CONTBACTOR TO'mL BID
... J.. L. s. Hawley Corp. & Paul Hubbs
IZ'W'indale, CA $153·, 010. 00
2 •. J. w. Mitchell, Inc.
Irvine, CA $208,065.00
3. Kordick Construction
Irvine, CA
~(p
~,325.00
4.. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
Azusa, CA
"K"
$247,125.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and
find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend
award to L. s. Hawley Corp. and Paul Hubbs, a Joint Venture, of
Irwindale, California, in the bid amount of $153,010.00 as the lowest
and best bid. ~M~aO~~
I concur with the above recommendation
to award Contract No. 2-14-SR.
Engineer
Deputy Chief Engineer
AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 2 . "K"
"L"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-172-2
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ENGINEERING SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF
CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ENGINEERING
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN
OF CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-21,
PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL SURVEYING WORK REQUIRED IN
CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with
Lowry & Associates for engineering services in connection with design of
Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed:appropriate to amend the agreement with Lowry &
Associates to provide for additional surveying work required in connection with
said project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2 of Orange Cotmty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 to that certain ~greement_~ated May 9, 1979,
' by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange ColDl.ty and Lowry &
Associates, providi~g for additional surveying work required in connection with
construction of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor, Contract No. 2-21, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That an increase the payment provision for said surveying
services is hereby authorized from an amount not to exceed $12,000 to an amotmt
not to exceed $16,000 for said work; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said addendum in form approved by the
General Cotmsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980.
AGENDA ITEM #9(M) -DISTRICT 2 "L"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-173-6
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT
OF DOVER DRIVE TRUNK METER VAULT AND CONNECTING
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF
DOVER DRIVE TRUNK METER VAULT AND CONNECTING SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 6-8
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange
Cotmty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Shaller & Lohr, Inc.,· District's
e~gineers, for Abandonment of Dover Drive Trtmk Meter Vault and Connecting Sewer,
Contract No. 6-8, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and tillle at which. said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Chief
Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980.
AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 6 "M"
~:-.. _~_J,,PACIFIC PIPEUNE CONSTRUCTION CO.)
"N"
PIPELINES • CONDUIT C:ONSTRUC:T10N • UT1LJT1ES
C:A&.IP'ORNIA CONTRACTOR'S L.IC:BNSK NO • .&4371
flOST OP'IP1Cl!C BOX 177 .. , IU7Z C:ONSTRUC:TION C:U•c:i.a: S:AST, SUITS: Z
IAVINE, CAL.Jl"ORNIA 92714 TIU.EPHONE (714l 591 ·~001
October 27, 1980
County Sanitation Districts ·
of Orange County, California
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Att~ntion: Thomas M. Dawes
Subject: Your letter dated October· 21, 1980
Gentlemen:
To clarify your referenced letter, our firm did-not authoriz~
repair of RA-30· Subtrunk Sewer and we did not, and do not
assume responsibility for damages.
We .have contacted our Insurance Carrier and will let them
fo~low through with a thorough investigation of -a11 fac~s.
Very truly yours,
COMPANY
>
GA:mb
cc: Marv Arnold -Pacific Telephone
Jay Miller -Bayly, Martin ' Fay
City of Irvine -Secretary of Boards
AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DIST~ICT 7 "N"
"0-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
November 5, 1980
of Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.0.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
STAFF REPORT FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
PURCHASE OF A MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADDITIONAL
BELT PRESSES
(714)540-2910
(714) 962·2411
Staff has evaluated the need for more reliable and less energy
consuming dewatering devices. Consideration was given to:
l. Age of centrifuges at Plant No. 1.
2. Extension of dewatering facilities at Plant
No. 2 with the possibility of concentrating
all dewatering activities at Plant No. 2 and
phasing out all dewatering activities at
Plant No. 1 during the next five years.
3. All dry storage facilities are located at
Plant No. 2 along with the sludge transport
and trucking support facilities.
As a part of the interim sludge dewatering operations, it appears
the most feasible measures to be taken at this time are:
1. Replace three or four centrifuges at Plant
No. 2 with belt presses of exact model and
manufacture as those to be supplied on
Contract P2-24-2.
2. Purchase of these three or four belt presses
will be at Districts' expense and may or may
not be installed by the P2-24-2 contractor,
depende·nt upon the competitive prices received
for installation.
3. It will be to the advantage of the Districts
to negotiate additional belt presses with the
same manufacturer in order that a savings' can
be realized, because of the ten presses to be
supplied to the contractor on P2-24-2. The
order would include both those presses pur-
chased by the contractor as well as those
purchased by the Districts at a unit cost
savings.
4. The centrifuges removed from Plant No. 2 will
be relocated to Plant No. 1 to increase the
reliability of the dewatering activities at
Plant No. 1. This will be an interim measure
pending final resolution of dewatering
activities for both plants.
AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS "0-1"
.....
,._~ .. _"r'W. .~~ ~ ..... " .. -... •
r---,-
, I I I
' ~ L . _____ J
---~. -----~I--·
____ j
'~~;itr:;ri:r~ .:=~
.._ ____________ ___, ---------·-----------··-·
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNfA. ·-·
·-· -.. . . ··---· ----..... ·-····. --· ·-/ _,.._? --------===========~]~I Lt:==== /IL°f-o~r;:~p~~~~~;5-=--· ··· ·
-o e
11 0-2 11 · AGENDA ITEM #11 -ALL DISTRICTS "0-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
A.REA CODE 714'
540-2910
962-2411
P. C. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10944 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO CJFF·RAMP, SAN OIEGC FREEWAY)
October 27, 1980
Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue.
Fountain Val:ley ,. California 92708
Subject: C~r.ti£ication of Negotiated· Fee for Engineering Services
in Conjunction with Design of Modification to One MGD
JPL Activated Carbon T~eatment System·Pilot Plant
In accordance with the Districts'· procedure~. for selection of professional
engineering service, the Selection Committee, as authorized by the Districts'
Boards of Directors pursuant to minute order of October 8, 1980, has
negotiated the following fee with· John_ Carollo Engineers for engineering
services in conjunction with the Design of Modification to One MGD JPL
Activated Carbon Treatment System Pilot Plant.
·Fixed Fee $47,000.00
Plus actual direct labor costs
Plus actual eligible overhead
Plus actual direct expenses
Plus actual subcontractor costs:
Fluor Engineers and Constructors,. Inc.
Total above fees not to ·exceed $598,500.00
'
$427,~00..00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fees
·as.reasonable for the services to be performed, and that ·said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
Bill Vardoulis, Chairman
Selection Committee
Donald A. Holt, Jr. , Vice-Chaiz:man
Selection Comniittee
Approved
----------------------~
"P-1"
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 V
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
November 5, 1980
ST AF F REPORT
ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH
PHASE II JPL ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT SYSTEM PROCESS
·With the Districts continuing effort to find a more efficient
method of sludge. disposal, as we11·as developing processes to
meet future·effluent.discharge requir~~nts, considerable
effort has been devoted to the evaluation of the JPL-ACTS·
process. To date the· Districts have done the following in the
development of this innovative process.
1973 -The Districts entered into a cooperative effort with.JPL
NASA on a trailer ·mounted 10,000 gpd pilot facility.
1975 -Award of $3.5 million grant for the construction.of a
1-MGD pilot plant at Plant No. 2 and evaluati~n·of the
process on a plant scale basis •
. :19.17. -Publication of report on construction and ·operation .of
1-MGD JPL-ACTS pilot ·facility. Although the process
performed as anticipated, there were several mechanical
.deficiencies noted to be correcteq prior to · ~e f·inal.iza-
tion of acceptable d~sign criteria for subsequent facilities:.
i978 -Board authorized. contract with Fluor Engineers and
. Constructors in-the amount of $148,760 £or review of all
data regarding feasibility of the process.
1980 -Award of contract to Fluor.for $480,000 for grant funded
Phase II design of modifications to l~MGD facility.
At the ·time of the negotiations with Fluor Engineers and .Constructors,
Inc. for the grant funded portion of this· ·Phase II effort, Fluor
was not familiar with the EPA requirements contained in all A/E
contracts designated as Appendix C-1. Appendix. c-·1 ha:s certain
provisions that are not· acceptable t9 Fluor, ..notably the rights
and·· remedies clause, corrective action requirements, and
consequential damages. An EPA funded contract. cannot be approved
without the provisions contained in Appendix C-l. It is the
desire of both EPA, and staff to .retain a process engineer with
"P-2" AGENDA -ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-2"
"P-3"
Staff Report
November 5, 1980
Page Two
equal competency to Fluor to be involved with a Phase II ·
effort. It should be noted that the Districts continuing
efforts on the JPL-ACTS process have been noted· in the LA/OMA
Facilities Plan and EIS. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington has indicated a procedure whereby Fluor can still
be involved with the Phase II effort, without imposition of the
provisions contained in Appendix C-1. (See attached letter.)
The Selection Committee met with representatives from Fluor and
John Carollo Engineers to negotiate a cooperative agreement
whereby John Carollo Engineers would act as the prime contractor
and Fluor as the subcontractor to John Carollo Engineers. John
Carollo Engineers was involved in the initial Phase I effort in
the design.and construction of the existing 1-MGD facility.
In the negotiations· with John Carollo Engineers and Fluor,
Fluor stated that since initial negotiations in M~rch of this
year, their effort increased from $480,000 to approximately
$550,000 due to inflationary increases estimated at a minimum
of one percent per month and the March negotiations not including
provisions for costs associated with Appendix C-1. However, in
view of the arrangement with Fluor as a subcontractor to John
Carollo Engineers,. Fluor has revised thei.r efforts to a level
of $427, 500 from $550 ,·ooo. The balance of the effort has been
assumed by John Carollo Engineers in the amount of $171,000 for
a total Task I effort of $598,500.
It is recommended that the Boards approve this engineering
agreement subject to approval by the State Water Resources
Control Board. and certification.of grant,funding. (See attached
letter.)
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-3"
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMEI .. TAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
.. ~ .. ~
OFFICE OF WATER
AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Lewis:
This is a response to your letter dated July 17, 1980, in which you
requested guidance to resolve the reluctance of your consultant to accept
the provisions of Appendix C-1 of 40 CFR, Part 35.
Appendix C-1 contains required provisions for all consulting engineering
agreements and has been used unifonnly throughout the construction grant
program. these provisions were developed to balance the risk and responsibility
for the contract work between the grantee and the consultant.
A possible resolution of the problem, as we discussed on the telephone with
you, would be to have the process consultant assist your design consultant who is
presently doing work for you. In this way the Appendix C-1 provisions would be
contained in the design consultant agreement and some of these provisions would
apply to the work performed under subcontract by the process consultant •
. I advise that you contact the State .Water Resources Control Board and the
Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office in ~an Francisco to resolve
other specific problems of interpretation that you and your consultant may have ..
After reviewing this matter further, if you have any additional questions,
please let me know.
Sincerely yours,
i·
v4a1r)) Y) '8 JJ;:)_)J
Harold P. Cahill, Jr.
. Director
Municipal.Construction Div~sion (WH-547)
"P-4" AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-4"
TATE Of CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR .• Go ... rnor
TATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
1VISION OF WATER QUALJTY
• O. Box 100 • Sacramento 95801
1 16) ' -~ . ~7971
\._)
HAR 2 6 1980
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Co\mty Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
_.;
Dear Mr. Harper:
In Reply Ref er
to: 512:ELM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (CSDOC), ACTIVATED CARBON
TREATMENT SYSTEM, PROJECT NO. C-06-1073-01, AMENDMENT TO PLAN OF STUDY
APPROVAL
On December 24, 1974, this office approved your Plan of Study for treatment
and disposal alternatives. Included in the approved plan was a pilot study
of the Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACTS). The purpose of the ·pilot
study was to determine whether ACTS is a feasible alternative for both
wastewater and wastewater solids treatment. Interest was expressed in the
system because it appeared that ACTS could be energy efficient and might
remove toxic wastes better than conventional secondary treatment. ACTS
would a1so convert wastewater solids to an inert ash that could be disposed
of in Class II sanitary landfills~
A pilot study of ACTS was conducted through 1977 and a pilot study report
was completed in November 1977. The results of the pilot study· indicated
that the previously discussed benefits might be'obtainable, but that further
work would be necessary to verify these claims. In particular, numerous
problems prohibited the cgllection of meaningful results. These problems
included the following:
1. Pressure filter feed supply was not uniform or reliable•
2. Filter press average cycle time was low, only one filter was used,
and filter cakes were of ten too wet.
3. The sludge drying system was inefficient and unreliable.
4. The sludge reactor was vulnerable to upsets in both upstream and down-
• stream facilities and was subjected to frequent heat-up and cool-down
cyc1ing (resulting in stress and corrosion failures).
In spite of the initial results, the State Water Resources Control Board and
EPA continue to believe that ACTS has potential. For this reason, this office
has care£ully reviewed ·your request, dated February 26, 1980, to conduct a
~ further evaluation of ACTS, The Division of Water Quality hereby ~pproves
the study as described in your request and in this letter (see last paragraph
"P-5" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -.. ALL DISTRICTS "P-5"
"P-6"
Mr. Fred A. Harper -2-HAR 2 e tHO
concerning authorization to proceed).
The purpose of the study is to determine the operating characteristics and
optimum design parameters of ACTS. In addition, the study is intended to
answer the following questions:
1. How effective is the system in removing BOD, suspended solids, heavy
metals and pathogens from the wastewater?
2, What is the yield of activated carbon?
3. What are the energy requirements and energy output of the system?
·Is ACTS energy self-sufficient?
To answer these questions, CSDOC shall modify the system as necessary to
ensure that it is capable of operating on a continuous basis, and shall
opera·te the facility for a 12-month period. During the modification period,
CSDOC shall prepare and submit a detailed scope of work to this of £ice.
The scope shall identify the parameters to be monitored during the period
of operation and the questions CSDOC expects to be able to answer as a
result of the study. The scope of work shall also detail proposed.arrange-
ments between the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and CSDOC. The scope of work
must be approved by this office before CSDOC begins to operate the ACTS
pilot plant. Following the 12-month operation period, CSDOC shall prepare
a pi1ot study report discussing the results of the study.
The estimated total cost of the study and report is $2.75 million. Please
note that this ·estimate does not include the cost or hiring personnel from
EPA's Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, since this cost is~
grant-eligible.
' Because EPA is withholding most grant funds until September 1980, this letter
is ~ an authorization to proceed with the pilot study. As soon as funds
are available, we will notify you in writing to proceed. At that time, we
will also establish a schedule for the pilot study. Should you have any
questions, please call Betty Meyer of my staf_f at (916) 322-6653.
Sincerely,
.··.I : ',_: , ~ "' .. ·. '.. J.,.
l~---··
Raymond_ Walsh
Division Chief
Manager -Clean Water Grant Program
cc: .Jim Anderson, Executive Officer
CRWQClS, Santa Ana Region (8)
Fred Leif
EPA, Region IX
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco· CA 94105
AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "P-6"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-169
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
RE 1-MGD JPL-ACTS PILOT PLANT
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES RE PHASE II MODIFICATIONS
AND OPERATION OF THE 1-MGD JPL-ACTS PILOT PLANT
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, on April 9, 1980, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Collllty, California, adopted
Resolution No. 80-61, approving agreement with Fluor Engineers and Constructors,
Inc. for engineering services re Phase II modification and operation of the
1-MGD JPL-ACTS pilot plant; and,
WHEREAS, Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. has declined to execute said
agreement because of certain clauses set forth in Appendix "C-1" of the regulations
promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency covering Federal grant-f\lllded
projects; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has suggested an alternative
method of completing the work by entering into an agreement with the Districts'
\
design consultants, John Carollo Engineers, providing for the work to be performed
by the process consultant, Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., as a subcontractor;
and,
WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Co\lllty, California, adopted
Resolution No. 80-161, rescinding Resolution No. 80-61 approving agreement with
Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. for said Phase II work; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing
procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural
services; and,
"Q-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1"
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with
John Carollo Engineers for Phase II modifications and operation of the 1-MGD
JPL Activated Carbon Treatment Systems (ACTS) pilot plant, and providing for
Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc. to be the process consultant to John
Carollo Engineers for said work; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Conunittee, established pursuant to said procedures,
has certified the final negotiated fee for services re Task 1 of said Phase II
work, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Col.lllty, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That· the certain agreement dated _________ by and
between County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange Col.lllty and John Carollo Engineers
for engineering services in connection with design and preparation of detailed
plans and specifications for equipment and construction(Task 1); construction
supervision and 'inspection (Task 2); and operation and evaluation of results (Task 3)
relative to Phase II modifications and operation of the -1-MGD JPL Activated Carbon
\
Treatment System (ACTS) pilot plant, and providing for Fluor Engineers and
Constructors, Inc. to be the process consultant to John Carollo Engineers for
said work, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for Task 1 engineering services is hereby authorized
in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement on a per diem fee
basis, for actual direct labor plus eligible overhead and actual direct expenses,
for a total amount not to exceed $598,500.00; and,
Section 3. That payment for Tasks 2 and 3 will be negotiated by the Selection
CollDllittee at the time the work is required; and,
Section 4. That said agreement shall provide that John Carollo Engineers
not be authorized to proceed with any work until approval from the State Water
Resources Control Board and written assurances. of grant funding are received; and,
"Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2"
i
Section 5. That the 'chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District
No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of
itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved
by the General Cotmsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 12, 1980.
"Q-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-3"
f I ~ . .. ·•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 3127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Paqe l of 9
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-l073-l30 ----"'-···-------------=-==-c. o. NO. 1 -------------------=-CONTRACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMJ:CALS, INC. OATE ·-· -~~9'U~~-~-' --~9~~-_ ---~-_
_ .. _ . _ . . · --.QxYGEN~®_~i(ATION AND. STORAGE FACILITIES , ANO OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 7 5
JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT A'l' PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2.~23.~.2-. . . ···--······-··--·-. ----·-------·----
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (XJi*18 " 8 1 $ 66,893.32
. . ~ a~~or~~e with contract provisions, the following change& in the contract
__ .. an~/9r eontr_act ~rk-are hereby authorized and as compensation-therefor,--the following-· --·
additions to or deductions from the contract price are her"by approved-.·
l. CRC 2-1: Section 54-8 of Detailed· Spec·i:f ications·.
Substitute two-speed motors for 8 specified single speed
aerator drive motors. Substitute standard 9earbox for
vari-speed type qearbox and add 8 _switches, enclosures ·
and panels.
Reason for cba.nqe: Improved reliability, ease of
operation and reduced maintenance.
No cost chanqe to contract.
2. CRC 2-2: Section 53-7 (i) of Detailed Specifications·.
Substitute A:r:malloy coated carbon steel expander sha.£t
for specified stainless steel shaft.
Reason for chanqe: Stainless steel shaft stress limits
are unacceptable to ~pplier. Armalloy coated car.ban·
steel is stronqer and has higher corrosion resistance.
No cost change to contract.
3. CRC 2-3: Sections 58-2 & 58-3 of Detailed Specifications.
Substitute carbon steel for cement lined cast iron in
cooling water pipe.
Reason for chanqe: Improved cleanliness and elimination
of complex pipe supports.
No cost change to contract.
4. CRC 2-4: Section 26-7 of Detailed Specifications.
Substitute grade 60 reinforcing bar for grade 40.
Reason for change: Improved reinforcing.
No cost change to contract.
"R-1" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS
$ o.oo
a.co
o.oo
0.00
"R-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALL:Y, CALIFORNIA 92708
Paqe 2 of 9
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . C-06-1073-130 ·-. ---.... ~· ... ----·
C.O. N0.~ __ 1 ________________ _
---~---... ----·--__ ,,_
~TRACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE -~uqust 4, __ 1980 _
__ -:--~·-·-oXYG:Elf-~~TION-AND STORAGE FACIUTIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 75
JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2~23~2. __ .. . .. . ........... ---·--···
s. CRC 2•5: orawinq IM02 & IM03.
Substitute nine 2" diameter conduit blockouts for
3'6" x 1'6" blockout in utilities tunnel.
Reason for chanqe: Improved desiqn.
No cost cha.nqe to contract.
6. CRC 2-6: Addendum No. l, Supplement Orawinq No. l.
Change to substitute clamp detail shown in APCI Drawinq
7-3322-09.99-0l Rev. B for detail shown in OCSD P2-23-6
Drawing 4S l2A Section E Detail adds anchor bolts and
grout pocket-. Detail substitutes 5/8" anchor bolts· for
hex bolts, adds 288 expansion anchors and corner angles.
Deletes 6" x 6" seat anqle and anchors. Adds 768 hold
down clamps. Deletes work by P2-23-6 contractor of·
installation of seat angle and anchors, 3/S" plate and
embeddinq of nuts in concrete under angle. Adds grout
pocket, grout and clamp handling.
Reason for chanqe: OCSD P2-23-2 specified clamp detail
(Addendum 1 SD-1) was omitted from P2-23-6 bid drawinqs.
P2-23-6 contractor had no indication of any clamp hardware
installation until receipt of the APCI drawings. Simpler
installation and less change for oxygen leakage.
No cost change to contract.
7. c.~ 2-7: Section 53 of Detailed Specifications.
Credits for equipment changes:
Delete one lube oil pump, Substitute standard lube oil
and expander. ~ontrol system for specified separate control
panel, delete compressor inlet and discharge silencers,
substitute standard inhibited admiralty brass intercooler
for specified 70/30 CuN, substitute welded carbon steel
pipe for specified cast iron in coo.linq water system, and
eliminate expansion joints.
Reason for chanqe: Improve design, operation and reliability
by elimination of unnecessary equipment and substitution of
"--' pref erred materiils.
Total cost reduction to contract.
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS
o.oo
0.00
(.25, 000. 00)
"R-2"
. •,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Paqe 3 of 9
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-130
------------------~-=-------··--·-----·· ·----c. o. N0. ____ 1 ________________ ~1._,.~L
CONTRACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE Au9U~~--~'---~9~0 ____ --··-
--_ .. ----ox:y~-GE~TION-AND STORATE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN OI-SSOLOTION FACILITIES FOR 75
JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2...~23:-2_ _ ----·---·-.. .. -·--·---___ ---·---
8. CRC 2-8: APCI Drawing 7-3335-4001.
Weld stud eXtension to cold box ancbor bolts to increase
projection to required lenqth.
Reason for change: To compensate for construction error
by contractor.
No cost change to contract.
9. CRC 2-9: Section 53-S(c) of Detailed Specifications.
Substitute carbon steel for stainless steel for water
side shell of product vaporizer.
Reason for change: carbon steel design was determined
satisfactory and wordinq of specification could be
interpreted as allowinq carbon steel shell.
No cost chanqe to contract.
10. CRC 2-11: Section 61-2 of Detailed Specifications.
Substitute Plasite for specified epoxy paint system on·
aerator covers.
Reason for change: Plasite exceeds specification
requirements ana is considered by Contractor the only
acceptable coating for the application.
No cost change to contract.
ll. CRC 2-10: Section 53-10 of Detailed Specifi~ations.
Provide nine additional analog signals for transmission
to computer.
Reason for change: Requested by Districts for improved
operational capabilities.
Additional cost to contract.
II R-3" AGENDA ITEM #14 ._ ALL DISTRICTS
0.00
o.oo
0.00
8,625.00
"R-3 11
COUN7Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Page 4 of 9
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-llO
C.O. N0. ____ 1 ________________ _
~NTRACTOR·~--llR--PROD~CTs-AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE · . Aug~s~ .41...198.0 .
· --.. --~--~--:-oXYGEN""·-~'l'ION""AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 75
JOB: MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P~-~3~_2 __ ·__ _ ··-···-..... _. ·--
-·----··-··-.. --·-----·-
-. 12. CRC 2-12: Section 53-6 (a) (13) of Detailed Specifications.
Substitute expansion anchors for anchor bolts to hold· ·
Crane Denning lube oil pumps.
Reason for chanqe:
could be located.
load.
Floor was poured before anchor bolts
Expansion anchors are· suitable for
No cost change to contract.
13. CRC 2-13: APCI OWq. 7-3335-6223 or Dwg-. IM04.
Modify compressor inlet piping to avoid interference
with structure constructed by P2-23-6 contractor.
Reason for chanqe: Structure was poured before piping
was installed. Interference was not noticed during
review of drawinqs by Contractor and Districts.
No cost change to contract.
14. CRC 2-14: Drawinq IM04.
Delete tie down straps on lube oil tanks
Reason for change: 'l'his is a plan clarification, not
a ~ontract change.
No cost cha.~qe to contract.
15. CRC 2-lS: APCI Owg. 7-3322-6202 & 7-3334-6204.
Install 12" oxyqen sleeves in Kennison Tunnel to pass
through st:ucture constructed by P2-23-6 contractor.
Reason for change: Coorclina tion of piping and related
work between P2-23-2 and P2-23-6 contracts.
No cost chanqe to contract.
"R-4" AGENDA ITEtl #14 -ALL DISTRICTS
· -·o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
"R-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GR.ANT NO.
Paqe S of 9
c-06-l073-I30
1
. -. ·--· ----···-
C.O. NO. ----------------~v CONTRACLOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE --~--~--.~~~~·-~-~· ~~8.Q __ ... --· -·-·
-. -.. -·--_ ··onGm·-~lfATI'C)N°AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN OISSOLtJTION FACILITIES FOR 75
J o·a : .. ..MGD IMPR6vEo TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 , JOB NO. P..2..~23_.:..2 ____ ·--·-... --·· ---~· . . .. ---. ·--··--~
16. CBC 2-lS: Orawinq 2M04 Section o.
Tap threads in deck penetration flanqes.
Reason for change: P2-23-2 drawinqs 2 M04 Section 0--
showed insufficient information for Contractor to
detemine required desiqn durinq the bid. Since it is
standard practice for APCI not to embed flanges in
concrete, Contractor assumed that a raised flange
would be suitable.
Adclitional cost to contract.
17. CRC 2-16: . APCI Drawinq 7-3335-6213.
Provide and install reducers and flanges to adapt
coolinq water drain line in 12 K!l buildinq to mate
with lines provided under P2-23-6.
Reason for change: Welded cooling water line allowed
under ClU:2-7-5 was not compatible with P2-23-6 interface.
contractor acknowledges that the oriqinal change was· at
Contractor's request and additional costs should have
been recoqnized at the tiJDe of Districts' decision.
~:o cost change to contract.
19. CRC 2-17: Sections 67-2000 & 44-24 of Detailed Specifications.
Substitute #14 wire for #12 control wire.
Reason for change: APCI standard for control wiring.
No cost chanqe to contract.
19. CRC 2-18: Sections 58-2 & 58-3 of Detailed Specifica~ions.
Substitute standard weiqh:t pipe for under 8" diameter,
Schedule 20 for 8-14" diameter for specified Schedule JO ..
pipe.
Rea.son for chanqe: Contractor's standard specifications
were qiven to installation contractor in error. Schedules
exceed requirements of application and a.ll applicable ANSI
codes.
Total cost reduction to contract.
"R-5" AGENDA ITEM ·#14 -ALL DISTRICTS
4,403.00
0.00
o.oo
(572.68)
"R-5"
. . ~ . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF.ORANGE COU~TY
P. O. SOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708,)
Paqe 6 of 9
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-130
------------------------1
\.,I ·-·--··-··-·-···--·--····-_. ····-----·-... C. 0. NO·----------CONTRACTOR: All. PRODOCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DAT;:: .. .. Auqust 4, 1980
ox!GEN_ G~RAnoN-·AND STORAGE FACILl:TIEs, AND OXYGEN oiSsoLUTiaN-FAai.ITi-Es -Faa-·15
JOB: MGD IMPROVED Tm:ATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-2~.:-:~--
20. CRC 2-20: Section 53-6 of Detailed Specificati.ons.-
Substitute 24% compressor stability for specified
25% stability.
Reason for chanqe: Modification to achieve additional
l\ would cause additional power consumption with no
imp:rovement in performance.
No cost chanqe to contract.
2l. PCH 2-3: · Drawinq lSOl.
Substitute : 3/811 for * l/8" tolerance in Contractor
Specification for vertical alignment of cold box A.
Reason for cha.nqe: Tolerance is suitable for· cold
box operation.
No cost change to contract.
22. PCB 2-5 : Drawing lSOl.
Provide LOX tank foundation design for 28% lateral
seismic load in lieu of specified 22\.
Reason for cbanqe: Improved stability of foundation.
Additional cost to contract.
23. PCH 2-7: Section S4-3(b) (3) of Detailed Specifications.
Install aerator support structures.
Reason for chan9e: P2-23-6 DS4-3 (Jb) contract
excluded installation of aerator support structures
and anchor bolts. Work must be done by P2-23-2
contractor.
Additional cost to contract.
"R-6" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS
o.oo
o.oo
J,932.00
56,806.00
"~-6"
•. , ~ , COUNTY SANITATiON DISiRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
?. O. BOX 8127 -10844 E'.LIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOKN!A 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.
Paqe 7 of 9
C-06-1073-130
-~--··~--····---..
C.O. N0. _____ 1 _______________ 1~~~-L
· CONTRACTOR:_ AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE Au~~t 4, 1980 ·
----OXYGEN~ ~tliERATfONANo STORAGE FACILZTIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR 75
___ JOB_~----.k!§~.Bm.~J1B-. .:£~NT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO •. E2.~.2.3~2 .. -. -· .... . ·-· .......... -· .... -··-·.
24. PC!i 2-8: Pipinq interference, Pump and Compressor
Buildinq Basement.
Modify coolinq water pipinq to eliminate interference-
wi th pipinq and conduit installed under P2-23-6
contract.
Reason for chanqe: Pipe interference was caused
when P2-23-6 drain pipinq was installed in wronq
location. Conduit locations were never established· -
on P2-23-6 drawings.
Additional cost to contract.
25. PCH 2-9:
Provide aerator support anchor bolts in accordance
with Contractor Drawing No. 302356 Rev. B.
Reason for change: This item is an approval of the
anchor bolt size and type, for use in the construction
of the curb as outlined under Item 6 CBC-2-6, Page
2 of 9 of this Change Order.
No cost change to contract.
26. PCB 2-10: Section 60-7 of Detailed Specifications.
Provide standard APCI lightninq protection detail
in lieu of de~il specified.
Reason for change: Speci.fied lightning protection
detail applies to building structures and cannot be
applied to a steel-shelled cold box containing a
number of steel and aluminum components.
No cost change to contract.
27. PCB 2-12: Add enclosures for Surge Protection and
Power Factor Correction capacitors.
Provide and install surge protection and capacitors
as aqreed in May 30, 1980 meeting.
Reason for chanqe: Additional work requested by
Districts not included in specifications.
Additional cost to contract.
"R-7" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DTSTRTr.Ts
2,110.00
o.oo
o.oo
9,536.00
, ·,. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Page 8 of 9
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-130 ....... __ -----------------------·-------·------c. 0. NO. 1 ---·-·--------------------------'e-ONTR.ACTOR: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. DATE _Auqust 4, 1980
--:------OXYGEN _.GENERATION.AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND OXYGEN DISSOLUTION FACILITIES FOR
JOB: 75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO..! __ P2.~4:~'.92. . -····---·-.
28. AW 2-2: Drawing lSOl.
Provide additional excavation of cold box.
Reason for chanqe: Extra excavation (overexcavation)
required. Specified extra provided in contract
specifications.
Additio~l~cost to contract.
29. CRC 2-22: Orawinq 7-3335-80040.
_Installation of panels in control room.
Reason for change: District has revised the layout
of the panels in the control room after the floor
has been poured. This necessitates core drillinq
throuqh the floor.
Additional cost to contract.
30. CRC 2-23: Design of Lox Tank Footings by ?A Enqineer.
Substitution of Rt:!gistered Structural Engineer
from Pennsylvania in lieu of Reqistered
Structural Enqineer from california to sign
plans submitted by Contractor.
Reason for chanqe: Districts Engineer accepted
the Registered Engineer from the state of
Pennsylvania because equipment and contract
drawinqs by the Contractor were prepared in
Pennsylvania. Contractor ha.s an on-qoinq
workinq relationship with enqineerinq in
Pennsylvania who is familiar with t.lle system.
No cost change to contract.
31. PCB 2-ll: Added Pipe Support Anchor Bolts
Installation of pipe support anchor bolts in
Compressor Building.
Reason for chan9e: The placement of the anchor
"'-11 bolts in the Compressor Building were deleted
from both.the P2-23-2 contract as well as the
"R-8" AGENDA ITEM #14. -ALL DISTRICTS
2,525.00
1,302.00
o.oo
"D-8" ••
COUNTY SANiiATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
?. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Paqe 9 of 9
...
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. c-06-1073-130 ... _____ _
CONTRACTOR:· AIR PROOOC'l'S ANO CHEMICALS, INC.
-OXYGEN"-GENERATIONttND STORAGE FACILITIES,
C .O. NO. ~ . ~
OA TE ----------~~~-~-1=:...!L _~~~9 ~----·-·······-
AND OXYGEN OISSOLOTION FACILITIES FOR
J 0 B : 7 5 MGO IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 , JOB NO.J~-~~.3:-:4 ___ . ------·------------------·--·---
----~-------------
31. {Continued)
P2-23-6 contract. It was the intent that these
would be installed by change order pending the
resolution of the supplier of the cryogenics
equipment.
Additional cost to contract. ·3,187~00
TO'l'AL ADD: $66,893.32
It is mutually agreed by both parties to this contract·tha.t ·by-the execution of this
Change orc:ler No. l that all items contained herein do adeqaa.tely and fairly···adjust
the ··contract price as it specifically relates only to Items· Nos. l · through· 31 above; --
It is _mutually agreed that no adjustment in the contract time ··is reqw.red · for Items ---
Nos~ 1 through 31 -inclusive of this chanqe order.
~-··---~-~-... ~---~··--;:::_;:;;··--~-~-·~-·~-~·----~---~--~-::;;;;:=================·-=···=··=··=· =-====·=···=»-=·-·=···==~~..:_
Board authorization date:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
By
------------------------~---------··-·-contractor
Original Contract Price $ 8,273,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo
This Change (ADO) (DeDt:KD) $ 66,893.32
Amended Contract Price $ 8,339,893.32
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By .... ____ .. __ ··-
"R-9" AGENDA ITEM #14 -Al I nr~TRTrT~
Chief Engineer
110 n11
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGe COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAL~EY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Page l of 2
CH.4,NGE ORDER GRANT N 0 • __ c_-_0_6_-_1_01_3_-_s_i_o ____ ._. --·--· --· -~·· -
~--------· --~9-hn.-~~--~_µ)covich Sons, Inc. & John A. C • 0. NO. ___ 6 __________ _
CONTRACTOR: Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture DATE October 27, 1980
-----------------------------........ ·---·-----·. ·--COAST-TlUJNICS.EWER;· .REACH l & 2, PORTION OF NEWLAblD STREET INTERCEPTOR
JOB: SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. ll~l.3-2
-·-----·-·· -~~~~~f this Change O.rder (ADO) >(:Me•~ $ 89,ASS.OO ------------------In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions rrom the contract price are hereby approved.
l. Furnish and install 12-inch steel dewatering effluent pipe,
Brookhurst Street to Santa Ana River, in lieu of discharging
dewaterinq effluent direct to Pacific Ocean (in accordance
with California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order
No. 79-127). The discharqe line was installed in April of
1980.
a.) Equi;iment:
b) Materials :
(4,183 feet of l2-inch pipe)
c) Labor:
Subtotal
$ 636.00
30,978.00
l,805.00
$33,419.00
2. Install in-line booster pumps in Santa Ana River effluent
line to handle hiqher than anticipated dewatering effluent
discharges. Work p~formed in Jul.y of 1980.
a) Equipment:
b) Material/Services:
c) La.bor:
Subtotal
$ 493.00
145.00
1,.227.00
$ l,865.00
3. Install and maintain 6-inch suction pump at meter structure
for installation of meter and 4-inch, 8-inch and 10-inch
diesel powered suction pumps to allow diversion of dewater-
ing effluent flows to Ta~ert Channel at Brookhurst Street,
move in-line booster pumps in Santa Ana Rive-r discharge
line; provide dai.l.y monitorinq of pumps. work performed
in September of 1980.
a) Equipment:
b) Material/Services
c} Labor:
Subtotal
$ 4,090.00
14,071.00
8,601.00
$2.6, 762. 00
4. Install relief dewateri:nq effluent discharqe line to Coast
Trunk Sewer manhole, Station 51+74, as directed by Engineer,
to reduce water volume in Santa Ana River discha.%'C]e line and
reduce in-line pumping. Work perfo:cmed in September of 1980.
a) Equipment: . $ 40.00
b} Materials/Services: l45.00
c) Labor: 214.00
Subtotal $ 399.00
"S-1" .~GEND.~ ITEM #28 DISTRICT 11
$33,419.00
$ 1,865.00
$26,762.00
s 399.00
"S-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. SOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Page 2 of 2
CHANGE ORDER GR.ANT NO . __ c_-_0_6-_1_0_1_J_-s_1_0_ ....... ----v-· .
___ ~lln---1\!' __ lg-j;Jlk._ovich Sons, Inc. & John A.
C.0. N0. _____ 6 ________________ __
CONTRACTOR: Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture DATE --~ ...... _.9_g_'t;c;>l?~.r-~1.1 .l~_~..Q. ______ .. __ ..
---_ --·~·-·coAsT-"TRUNIC' SEWEX;--REACH l & 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTE~TOR
JOB: SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. ll~_l_~::--4 ...... -~--· _ .. .
S. Power charqes for additional power used for in-line booster
pumps: $12,075.00
6. Credit for salvage value of pipe at 5% of purchase price
excluding mark-up: 5% x $58,107.90 = $ 2,905.00
7. 10-foot extension of tunnel under the Oranqe County Flood-
Control District Talbert Channel, Sta. 34+18.16 to 34+2a:.16,
in accordance with specifications and Item 7 of Change Order
No. l, for the unit price of $2,189/L.F.
10 feet x $2,189 = $21,890.00
8. Delete 10 feet of 84-inch 1500-D reinforced concrete pipe
sewer (Bid Item No. 2) at $405/L.F., Stations 34~18.16 to
34+28.16.
lO feet x $405/L.F.=.$ 4,050.00
GRAND TOTAL
~·. :.:-~ -:::;
SUMMARY OF CO~CT..TIME
$12,075.00
($ 2,905.00)
$21,890.00
($4,050.00)
~g ,455 .00
_ ~ o~iqJ.nar-contra¢:"t~··oa-ee
Origi~al Contract Time
O~igin~-Compi~~on Date
Time Extension. This c.o.
November l, 1979
400 Calendar Days
December 4, 1980
10 Calendar Days
TOTAL Time Extension
Revised·Contract Time·
Rev-ised Completion Date
60 Calendar Cays
460 Calendar Oay·s·
Fe.bruazy 2,· 1981
Original Contract Pi-ice $ 7,488,964.53
P rev. Auth. Changes $ 238, 095. 09
This Change (ADO) }(a;ow~s a9,455.oa
Amended Contra.ct ? r i ce $ 7 I 816 I 514 • 62
aoard authorization date: November 12, 1980 Approved:
Deputy Chief Engineer
By --------------------------------------con· fi .. act-or _______ ·-·-· -·-·
JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. & JOHN A.
ARTUKOVICH, JR., A JOINT VENTURE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orarrge-eo-untr; Ca-J-i··forrri a-~····-·--·---··-····-·-··
BY--···----·-·--.. ··--··-···--·--
Chief Engineer
A~~~n~ TT~M ~?R -nr~TQTrT 11 II(' I') II
Agenda lt~m No. .S. \
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
REVIEW OF PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA
Since June of 1976, the Board .of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 have considered various ·alternatives
to improve the collection system serving_ the Big Canyon Drainage
Area. There are presently three alternatives for improvements
and an alternative of "no project". It should be noted that all
of the proposed alternatives with the·. exception of ~·no project"
alternative will provide capacity for the present as well as the
ultimate development of the Big Canyon Drainage Area. Each of
the proposed improvement alternatives will provide an·iinproved
system with varying degrees of reliability. · Regarding the
secondary impacts associated with the construction of each of
the improvement alternatives, the air quali.ty· and noise considerations
would be about the same.
NEW PUMP STATION ALTERNATIVE ~ Capital Cost $1,085,000
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
This alternative has the minimtim disruption
to the environment during the.construction
of the improvements. The pump station would
be built at the same location as the present
·station. This alternative would not mean
any additional right-of-way through the
Big Canyon area and it would not impact
the ecological reserve.
The energy cost to operate this alternative
is· estimated at $32, 00-0 per year based on
present electrical rates. This alternative
is the least. reliable of the three alternatives
because of the mechanical equipment used to
-.~
Review of Proposed Alternatives
Big Canyon Drainage Area
Page Two
convey the raw sewage. The pump station
is susceptible to power outages resulting
in raw sewage overflows and other mechanical
failures. · There is a substantial annual
maintenance cost in· addition to. the mechanical
cost for the pump station alternative·.
JAMBOREE ROAD GRAVITY TUNNEL -Capital Cost $2-,650,000
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
This· alte.rnative will not disrupt the
ecological reserve. The gravity system is
more reliable than.a pump station alternative
which relies.upon mechanical equipment.
There are no energy costs with this alternative
and the yearly maintenance costs are
negligible.
Extreme high capital cost.and difficult
construction a·lternative. A considerable
amount of excavation material ··removed from
tunnel excavation would have to be transported
out of the area. for disposal. Trucks hauling
·excavated material· would disrupt vehicular
traf£ic.on Jambore~ Road, San Joaquin Road
and MacArthur Boulevard.
BACK.BAY TRUNK SEWER -Capital Cost $816,000 ·
Advantages· : This project has the same reliability a~
the gravity tunnel system in Jamboree Road
at a much reduced cost. It has an advantage
over the gravity tunnel system in Jamboree
Road· because it.is a shallow gravity system
and in case of a· catastrophic disaster
(earthquake, etc. ) repairs·· can be achieved
more expeditiously· and economically.
Capital cost for this alternative is the
l~ast of .:the three improvement alternatives.
• ......... '
Review of Proposed Alternatives
Big Canyon Drainage Area
Page Three
Disadvantages:
There is no energy cost associated with
this alternative and· annual maintenance
costs are negligible.
This alternative has··the largest impact
on the natural resources in the ecological
reserve. Although extensive ~itigation
measures have been established, the final
e·ffects of the impacts cannot be definitively
ascertained.
"NO PROJECT" ALTERNATIVE.· -Capital Cost $0
Advantages:
Disadvantages:.
.The most important aspect of this alternative
consideration is that the environment would
be in status quo with-no significant impacts
other than those experienced today. No
capital expenditures would be required but
on-going energy and maintenance costs would
be sustained.
Continued occasional sewage spills in Big
Canyon because of unreliable and undersized
and outdated sewage pump plant. This "no
project" alternative could not provide any
capacity for· additional development in the
drainage area. An alternate·means of service
would have to be investigated as service is
required.
I
\l
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
November 12, 1980
RAY LEWIS·: It is very important that we go through a
brief history of the project in order that you can make a deci-
sion on the best apparent alternative before you this evening.
We have a Jamboree Pump Station which was built in 1958 to, at
that time, accommodate the flows generated by Ford Aeroneutronics
It is a small pumping station which was planned to be relieved
and supplemented in the future. And the 1969 master plan
report called for a gravity system in Big Canyon along Back Bay
to tie into the Coast Trunk near the dunes area. The Board
back in 1976 directed us. to prepare several reports. The
documents are here. Environmental Impact Assessments, Negative
Declarations, Supplemental Environmental Reports, Plans and
Specifications.
At one time, our initial alignment was what we'd call
the southerly alignment through Big Canyon. That was opposed
and a northerly alignment was chosen. At that time a permit
was filed with the Coastal Commission, which was approved by
the Regional Commission and later denied by the State Commission
in 1977.
The Districts realized that there was still a
deficiency here, that our pumping station was in dire need of
doing something with it. · We have only two pumps in there; one
pump is running 24. hours a day and the other pump is running
somewhere in the neighborhood of four hours a day. So if we
-1-
lose one pump, there are four hours that we are not pumping and
raw sewage has ·been spilled in the immediate vicinity in Big
Canyon.
Other alternatives were investigated. One was the
alternative to improve the existing pmnp station. This would
require a wet well, more pumps, a force main·up to the top of
the hill and gravity down Jamboree Road to the Coast Trunk
adjacent to the Newporter Inn.
Another alternative that was investigated was a
gravity tunne'i. A gravity tunnel would start at the existing
pump station, it would tunnel 4500 feet in .length and come out
around the tennis courts at John Wayne Tenn·is Club. At one
point it would be about 95 feet in depth. There are impacts,
both advantages and disadvantages to the three alternatives.
The Board hired EDAW, environmental consultants to
bring together all the work done to date, to prepare the Draft
EIR ~d the Final EIR which is before you this evening. They
went through the series of early impact meetings that were
held in accordance with the Woodland Hills decision prior to
the drafti~g of the_ Draft EIR. The Draft EIR was presented
to you at the October 8, 1980 Board meeting. At that time
this Board felt that the gravity Back Bay Sewer alignment was
the .best apparent alternative and based on the information at
hand the staff filed· an application with the Coastal Commission
for th.at preferred· alignment.~ The Board, at that time, indi-
cated that if information of substantial nature was presented
-2-
lose one pump, there are four hours that we are not pumping and
raw sewage has been spilled in the innnediate vicinity in Big
Canyon.
Other alternatives were investigated. One was the
alternative to improve the existing pump station. This would
require a wet well, more pumps, a force main up to the top of
the hill and gravitate down Jamboree Road to the Coast Trunk
adjacent to the Newporter Inn.
Another alternative that was investigated was a
gravity tunnel. A gravity tunnel would. start at the existing
pump station, it would tunnel 4500 feet in length and come out
around the tennis courts at John Wayne Tennis Club. At one
point it would be about 95 feet in depth. There are impacts,
"both· advantages and disadvantages"to the three alternatives.
The Board hired EDAW, environmental consultants to bring
together all the work done to date, to prepare the Draft EIR
and the Final EIR which is before you this evening. They
went through the series of early impact meetings that were
held in accordance with the Woodland Hills decision prior to
the drafting of the Draft EIR. The .Draft EIR was presented
to you at the October 8, 1980 Board mee~ing. At that time
this Board felt that the gravity Back Bay Sewer alignment was
·the best apparent alternative and· based on the information at
hand the staff filed an application with the Coastal Commission
for that preferred alignment. The Board, at that time, indi-
cated that if information of substantial nature was presented
-2-
between now and finalization of the environmental document it
may weigh in their decision to s-elect the best apparent
alternative.
The Corps of Engineers, it is assumed through the
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service als·o commented on some of the .
concerns before 1977 regarding the Lightfooted Clapper Rail.
They made the .comment 11 we have determined that there is
insufficient evidence of potential adverse impacts to the
federally listed enda~gered· Lightfooted Clapper Rail in those
portions of the project site and within the purview of Section
404 to warrant a Section 7 consultation." We feel that is a
significant f·inding of the Corps. There. is also a letter
from the City of Newport Beach in support of the gravity sewer.
Ther~· is also a lette~· from th~ county of orange, En~ironmental
Management Agency, as to their concern regarding air quality
and noise. The consultant has responded to these comments and
those responses are included ·in the Final EIR. I should
mention that on Monday of this week, there was a hearing at
the Huntington Beach.City Council before the Regional Coastal
Commission., at which time testimony was given and heard by the
commissioners. We received from the Regional Commission a
favorable vote, 7 votes in favor and 3 abstentions. There
was some opposition to the permit issuance which was registered
at that time.
BILL VARDOULIS, JOINT CHAIRMAN: Any questions to
be asked from any of the Directors?
-3-
JACKIE HEATHER, CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO. 5: Is it
appropriate to go through the EIR and pick up some corrections?
RAY LEWIS, CHIEF ENGINEER: If you find there are
corrections needed, yes. There is the date on there that will
be corrected.
JACKIE HEATHER: Please take care of that. You
have December of 1980 in it.
RAY LEWIS: That will be corrected.
JACKIE HEATHER: The Coastal Commission staff during
the presentation pointed out that the sewer line in the reach
between San ~oaquin and the Dunes is on the bayside and the
EIR does point out that it is on the landward side but someone
has to make· t~is correctior.r, I think with the Coastal Cormnis-
sion, should it get appealed.
RAY LEWIS: That's correct. I caught that one time
and someone was telling me that there is a· bayside and the
wa~er side and the bayside is the inland side. Maybe this is
some of the confusion.
JACKIE HEATHER! No, he showed on the slide to the
commissioners that it would be right next to the water and was
potentially very damaging, and that's on 3 and 5. I wondered
if we have responses to the Irvine Company's letter. I
didn't see it there. Maybe the consultants can explain that.
RAY LEWIS: Charles, are there cormnents to the Irvine
letter?
CHARLES PILCHER, EDAW, INC.: My name is Charles
-4-
\..,I Pilcher. I'm with EDAW, Inc. We responded informally to the
Irvine Company but did not include formal responses to the
letter.
JACKIE HEATHER: It's in our EIR and everything else
has responses.
CHARLES PILCHER: We responded to their testimony,
which was essentially a positive comment. If the connnents
raised significant 'is·sues which need to be addressed to
clarify a certain issue we can respond. In discussing this
with the District's staff, we didn't f~el there were any
substantive issues that really needed to be clarified. But
we can if you request that of us.
~Y LEWIS: Madam Chairman, I.think you will find . . . · ....
in Section 10 there is a Part One, comments received at the
public hearing and responses thereto and a Part Two, written
conunents received and the responses. Included is the response
to Dayne Stiles testimony but not directly to his letter.
JACKIE HEATHER: When did we get the Irvine Company
letter? Was that a part of the public hearing?
RAY LEWIS: Yes, that was.
JACKIE HEATHER: But you responded to everything
else except for all the points they ran in· their attachment
· which seems very strange to me and they raised some~ I think,
significant comments.
BILL VARDOULIS: Is there a response in there?
RAY LEWIS: There is a response in there.
-s-
-.
BILL VARDOULIS: It's in there.
JACKIE HEATHER: Well, it just said that basically
they support it but here's another something along with it.
In their other comments they go through the.offset enhancement
activity, the costs, explore a tunnel failure, the Newport
Beach general plan and also the inclusion of an updated Fish
and Game thing so there are several things in there that could
be included. And that's .. not a problem?
CHARLES PILCHER: Generally the purpose of responding
to the comm~nts is to identify those requiring further
clarification on significant adverse impacts. In the letter
from the City of Newport Beach there were many facts in
support o~ the. p;-oject.. W~ .didn_'t ac.tually ~espond to those.
T~e letter was included. If there is something specific that
you feel needs to be responded to further., then we can look
at it.
The tape is inaudible --in response to Chairperson
Heather's comments regarding the responses to ·the Irvine
Company letter since the. issues raised were not of substance
and did not offer any information of substance the consultant
did not feel it was necessary to respond to all questions
posed. The responses given in Part One of the Final EIR were
·Sufficient to meet the intent.of the law.
JACKIE HEA~HER: So, along with that, we don't have
to respond to the written comments we received at the Coastal
Commission.
-6-
'.-' CHARLES PILCHER: No.
RAY LEWIS: The comment period did expire on
November 7. The Coastal Commission hearing was on the 10th.
JACKIE HEATHER: Do you see any problems for the
District in moving ahead considering the Regional Water
Quality Control Board's comments about the NPDES permit and
the fact that construction period during the non--rainy season
is identified in their letter as April 15th to September 15th
and we have one reach in construction November to the middle
of December for the Clapper Rail issue?
RAY LEWIS: No, we see no problem with them. The
NPDES permit is what they have to do for discharge of dewatering
water which we are doi~~ on Coast Trunk.and Plant No. 2 so
that is no problem. As far as timing. is concerned, they will
consent to the conditions set forth by the Coastal Commission.
This has been discussed with their staff.
JACKIE HEATHER: You know that? Because someone has
already responded earlier. Hal Thomas is on the Regional Water
.Quality Control Board. (inaudible)
RAY LEWIS: We should relate to the Directors. that
at the Coastal Commission hearing the approval by the
Commissioners incorporated the conditions set forth by the
Department of Fish and Game which are basically the same
conditions that were imposed three years .ago with some slight
modifications.. At that time we had the ~ortherly alignment,
\.._,) now we have the southerly alignment. There are some mitigations
-7-
-.
~ and as to the impacts on the willow trees, the width of the
right of way should mitigate that. We feel the conditions are
reasonable ·to minimize the impacts to the reserve. That is
staff's verbal report.
BILL VARDOULIS: Ok. Do we have anything additional
from the consultant regarding the Supplemental EIR.
CHARLES PILCHER: No. I think Ray summarized it.
JACKIE HEATHER: I move we receive and file the
written comments which were received after the public hearing
on October ·29_, 1980 with regard to this supplemental EIR.
Seconded by Riley. Unanimous.
BILL VARDOULIS: Any further staff comments regarding
the reso~~tion?
JACKIE HEATHER: Do we have to incorporate the review
of the proposed alternatives Big Canyon Drainage Area? Do we
need to read this or put it into the record?
RAY.LEWIS: I think ·it should be included with the
reference that the record does indicate that the Directors
have considered both the advantages and disadvantages of the
.alternatives including the "no project".
I will briefly outline these. The new pump station
the capital cost will be in excess of $1 million, $1,085,000.
The advantages are that it has minimum disruption to the
enviro·nment. We will be building in an already impacted area.
where the existing pump station i·s. We are not in the traffic,
'..,/ ·so there will be no impacts to the traffic. These are the
-8-
..
\wl advantages. The disadvantages are the higher costs, you will
be buying energy from this day forward and increased mainten-
ance costs. The gravity tunnel sewer tunneling through the
San Joaquin rise there. It has also a minimum impact on the
reserve. There will also be a very minimal impact as far as
vehicular traffic during construction with the exception of
the volume of earth that you will have to remove from the
tunnel will have to be transported out of the ·area for disposal.
It also is the most expensive alterna~ive, $2.65 million •. This
alternative would not consume any energy and.be very low in
maintenance, if any.
The Back Bay sewer alternative that we have discussed,
which the application to the Coastal Commission referred to,
has the disadvantage of the maximum impact on the environment.
It does impact the ecological reserve. There are the mitiga-
tions contained in the permit we think to minimize those. It
is the least expensive of the three implementation alternatives,
and it does not consume any energy. A very, very minimal
amount of maintenance cost is associated with it.
The last, of course, is the "no project" alternative,
everything is at status quo. You do still continue to pay the
energy costs. ·lt has .the advantage of zero dollars today,
no disruption to the environment outside of what is there now.
We would not off er sewer service through this collection
system to the undeveloped properties within the drainage area.
Other alternative methods of disposal would have to be sought.
-9-
Those are the three implementation alternatives plus
the "no project" alternative that we are considering.
BILL VARDOULIS: Move we incorporate this review of
proposed alternatives in __ the Big Canyon Drainage area EIR.
All those in favor? Opposed? Carried unanimously.
JACKIE HEATHER: Motion to approve Resolution 81-74-5
which is the.final .supplemental EIR impact report regarding
the sewerage improvements in the Big Canyon Drainage area and
certify that said report has been completed in compliance with
State-and District guidelines implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Motion seconded to receive, file and approve.
JACKIE HEATHER: It is ~s amended.
BILL VARDOULIS: Resolution 81-74-5, any discussion?
Those in favor? Opposed? Carried unaniinously.
HENRY WEDAA, DIRECTOR: I would like to ask some
questions, and I would like to wear my Coastal Conunissioner's
hat for this question. If this decision of the Coastal
Conunission the other day is in fact appealed to the State
Commission, does the District provide all the opposition
information to Jackie or to someone who could go up and help
her fight the appeal. How is that handled.?
BILL VARDOULIS: It is a g~od question.
JACKIE HEATHER: The District has hired .an attorney,
Allan Tebbetts to represent us, and we have the consultant,
'...J of course, EDAW.
-10-
-.
HENRY WEDAA: My only concern is that if an appeal
is filed, I ·think that we as a District, we as a joint board
ought to see that any necessary help is provided District 5
helping_ to get this thing through the .system. Is that what
we would normally do in this kind of situation or just what's
our procedure?
BILL VARDOULIS: I think we would be by offering the
services of the consultant and, if necessary, Ray.
HENRY WEDAA: I just want to see that if it is
appealed that we help to properly defend the issue.
vote?
JACKIE HEATHER: What was the Coas.tal Commission
Seven yes and three abstention.
BILL VARDOULIS: No noes.
JACKIE HEATHER: Our representative to the State
Commission abstained.
BILL VARDOULIS :. I expected either . that or a no vote.
Did that representative have to-abstain?
JACKIE HEATHER: No. He was unhappy about receiving
environmental documents that late.
BILL VARDOULIS: Ok. Item 32, consideration of
approval of best alternative project to sewer the Big Canyon
Drainage area.
JACKIE HEATHER: I move that the southerly route of
the Back Bay Trunk Sewer be the best alternative project to
~ sewer the District. Seconded.
-11-
-.
TOM WOODRUFF, GENERAL COUNSEL: If there are no
comments by the Directors and this motion is. to be considered,
I would urge ~hat you make certain findings relative to
the alternative project and specifically it seems to
me that based on the evidence that has been presented to you
both verbally and in written form prior to making this motion
both at this meeting and at preceding meetings and that
includes the .data ·contained in all the environmental assess-
ments and environmental report. And I.would recommend that
the Board consider at least the following findings in their
.decision:
First, that you approve the Back Bay gravity sewer
line alternative as approved and condition~d by the South
Coast Regional Coastal Commission on Monday, November 10th.
Secondly, that knowing the changes have been required
and incorporated into th~ project, ·most notably by the State
Fish and Game and Coastal Commission conditions and that
mitigation measures described in the final EIR which avoid
and mitigate the significant environmental effects described
in the final EIR, .and,
Thirdly, that specific economic and other considera-
tions including the energy costs, the capital c·os·ts and the
greater degree of reliability .for this gravity system as
opposed to pumping alternatives make.the project alternatives
described in.the final EIR such as the pump station and
tunnel not feasible.
-12-
JACKIE HEATHER: You could also add a health one
too.
TOM WOODRUFF: Add anything the directors desire.
JACKIE HEATHER: Because of the capacity problems
of' the "sewer line· and· p·otential ·for overflows and ·the fact
that the area has consistently high coliform counts which
makes it quarantine shell gathering and water contact sports
that •••
BILL VARDOULIS: That sounded good.
TOM WOODRUFF: Never lost a case before.
I would move to amend those findings as read and
the health finding.
Did you get that Rita?
Not really.
It's on the tape.
Ok, then Rita's got it.
Any other discussion on the findings?
All those in favor? All those opposed? Carried
unanimously. Will that cover, Tom?
TOM WOODRUFF: Yes ••• The motion was to proceed and
go forward approving the southerly alignment and go forward
.with it based on all the findings •••
Other business for District 5? District 5 adjourned.
-13-
; • .J RE: AGENDA ITEM #3l(E) -DISTRICT 5
RESOLUTION NO. 80-174-5
.APPROVING 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT RE: SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BIG CANYON
DRAINAGE AREA AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID REPORT HAS BEEN
COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE AND DISTRICT
GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
* * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, in early 1976, the Board of Directors received a report by
its staff indicating deficiency in the sewerage facilities serving the
Big Canyon drainage area, together with a recommendation for a study to
determine the possible ways of alleviating ·the deficiencies; and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1976, the Board of Directors received and filed
an Environmental Assessment prepared by the Districts' staff concerning a
possible Backbay Trunk Sewer (east side); and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors, by resolution
duly adopted, approved a negative declaration pertaining to the preparation
of plans and specifications for a Backbay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump
Station to Newport Dunes, generally in confonnance with the Districts'
1969 Master Plan Repo~t; and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors approved plans and
specifications for a Backbay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to
Newport Dunes. Plans and specifications were for the construction of addi-
tional facilities due to deficiencies in sewerage improvements located in
the Big Canyon drainage area; and
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1976, a Supplemental Environmental Assessment
prepared by the Districts' staff pertaining to the proposed Backbay Trunk
Sewer, was received and filed by the Board of Directors with instructions
to prepare the necessary Environmental Impact Report relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, on November IS, 1978, the Board of Directors approved a
Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed alternative facilities including
Jamboree Interceptor Sewer and Pump Station; and
WHEREAS, on January 23, 1979, the Board of Directors of the District
approved the final Environmental .Impact Report regarding the Big Canyon
Drainage Area and certified said report as being in.compliance with the State
and District guidelines; and
WHEREAS, on January 15, 1980, the Board of Directors authorized soli-
citing proposals for the preparation of a supplemental Environmental Impact
Report needed; and
WHEREAS, on August 5, 1980, the District, through its consultant
retained to prepare the Supplemental Environmental Report, held an early
input meeting consistent with the requirements of law, and invited all
persons known to have an interest in this project to participate and comment
on the forthcoming preparation of the draft report; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980, the Board of Directors of the District
received and filed a Draft Environmental tmpact Report regarding Sewerage
Improvements for ·the Big Canyon Drainage Area, establishing a comment period
to close on November 7, 1980. Copies of said report were presented to the
State Clearing House and mailed to all known interested parties; and
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1980, the Districts .filed an application
to the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission -South Coast Regional Commission
for the permit to construct the Backbay Gravity Line Sewer; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 1980, the District published in the Orange
Coast Daily Pilot, the Notice of Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental
Impact Report, said Public Hearing to be held October 29, 1980; and
..
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1980, the Notice of Completion of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report was posted in four locations along the project
route; and
WHEREAS, on October 29, 1980, the Districts conducted a Public
Hearing to receive commerits on the Draft Environmental Impact Report at which
time numerous persons were present and presented testimony relative to the
proposed project to the District Board; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 1980, which was established as the last day
to receive written comments on· the Draft Environmental Impact Report, whj.ch
written. comments have been received by the Clerk of this Board and which
-written comments are hereby received and filed and made a part of the
record; and
WHEREAS, on November 10, 1980, a Final Environmental Impact Report
was prepared taking into consideration all comments received, both verbal
and written, which final report has been presented to this Board of Directors
for their consideration.
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does hereby
find, determine, and order as follows:
l; Each of the recitals set forth above are hereby determined to be
findings of this Board and are incorporated herein by reference as those set
forth at light hereat and shall be deemed substantive revisions and findings
of this resolution.
2. The Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State guide-
lines and the Districts' adopted guidelines.
3. The Board has considered all testimony and evidence submitted by
interested persons pertaining to this project and has considered each of the
WHEREAS, on June 8, 1977, the Districts' Board of Directors approved
the revised. plans and specifications for the proposed Backbay Trunk Sewer; and
WHEREAS, on July 16., 1977, the Board of Directors received and filed
a summary of the project and proposed conditions for completion thereof,
pertaining to the Backbay Trunk Sewer; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the Coastal zone and therefore
subject to the State Coastal.Act, thereby necessitating approval by the
California Regional Coastal Commission; and
WHEREAS, upon completion of all environmental assessments, the
District submitted an application to the South Coast Regional Commission of
· the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, approval of the proposed construe-
tion of the gravity flow-line, referred to as the Backbay Trunk Sewer Line;
and
WHEREAS, the South Coast Regional Coastal Commission approved the
line for issuance of a coastal permit, said approval was appealed and sub-
sequently denied by the State Coastal Commission on September 21, 1977; and
WHEREAS, in early 1978, the Districts' staff had made determinations
that the deficiency of the sewerage drainage facilities for the Big Canyon
drainage area were of serious and urgent nature and so reported such to the
Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, on September 13, 1978, the Board of Directors of the District
I
received and filed a project report for the Big Canyon drainage area which
evaluated in greater detail other alternate methods for sewerage collection
for the Big Canyon drainage area than previously considered; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 1978, the Board of Di~ectors received and
filed a draft report on alternative facilities for the Big Canyon drainage
area; and
three alternative projects at length, taking into consideration the relative
mitigation measures available to each project, together with the environmental
impact created by each alternative project.
4. That adequate mitigation measures have been established to mini-
mize the significant environmental effects identified in the -Final Environ-
mental Impact Report pertaining to the construction of the Backbay Line.
5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 30253,
the project alternative of construction of the Backbay Line is the alternative
which provides the greatest minimization of energy consumption.
6. That the Final Environmental Impact Report regarding sewerage
Improvements at Big Canyon Drainage Area, dated November 10, 1980, is hereby
approved, certified, and the Board hereby determines that it may proceed
i1IDllediately to consider the proposed project construction of the Backbay
Sewer for approval.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at this regular meeting of the Board of Directors
on this 12th day of November, 1980.
RE: AGENDA ITEM #3l(E) -DISTRICT 5
RESOLUTION NO. 80-174-5
'APPROVING 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONi-.IENTAL IMPACT
REPORT RE: SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BIG CANYON
DRAINAGE AREA AND CERTIFYING TifAT SAID REPORT HAS BEEN
COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE AND DISTRICT
GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
* * * * * * * * * *
WHERE:.;S, in early 1976, the Board of Directors received a report by
its staff indicating deficiencfin the sewerage facilities serving the
Big Canyon drainage area, together with a reconunendation for a study to
determine the possible ways of alleviating the deficiencies; and
l~iEREAS, on June 9, 1976, the Board of Directors received and filed
an Environmental Assessment prepared by the Districts' staff concerning a
possible Bac~y Trunk Sewer (east side); and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors, by resolution
duly adopted, approved a negative declaration pertaining to the preparation
of plans and specifications for a Bacijpay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump
Station to Newport Dunes, generally in confonnance with the Districts'
/~?~ster Plan Report; and
/ WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors approved plans and
specifications for a Bac~y Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to
Newport Dunes. Plans and specifications were for the construction of addi-
tional facilities due to deficiencies in sewerage improvements located in
the Big Canyon drainage area; and
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1976, a Supplemental Environmental Assessment
prepared by the Districts• staff pertaining to the proposed Bac~y Trunk
Sewer, was received and filed by the Board of Directors with instructions
to prepare the necessary Environmental Impact Report relating thereto; and
-•
WHEREAS, on June 8, 1977, the Districts' Board of Directors approved
the revised plans and specifications for the proposed Backbay Trunk Sewer; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 1977, the Board of Directors received and filed
a summary of the project and proposed conditions for completion thereof,
pertaining to the Backbay Trunk Sewer; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the Coastal zone and therefore
subject to the State Coastal Act, thereby ne~essitating approval by the
.s~~
Galiforn:H!. Regional Coastal Commission; and
WHEREAS, upon completion of all environmental assessments, the
District submitted an application to the South Coas~ Regional Commission of
the Coastal Zone Conservation Corrunission}l~f the proposed construc-
tion of the gravity flow-line, referred to as the Backbay Trunk Sewer Line;
and
WHEREAS, the South Coast Regional Coastal Commission approved the ~ .~ ~·~.:i,
line for issuance of a coastal perrni ~d approval was appealed and ~-
sequently denied by the State Coastal Commission on September 21, 1977; and
WHEREAS, in early 1978, the Districts' staff had made determinations
that the deficienc'/ of the sewerage drainage facilities for the· Big Canyon
drainage area were of serious and urgent nature and so reported such to the
Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, on September 13, 1978, the Board of Directors of the District
I
received and filed a project report for the Big Canyon drainage area which
evaluated in greater detail other alternate methods for sewerage collection
for the Big Canyon drainage area than previously considered; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 1978, the Board of Directo:cs received and
filed a draft report on alternative facilities for the Big Canyon drainage
area; and
,J.
~-
WHEREAS, on November is·, 1978, the Board of Directors approved a
Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed alternative facilities including
Jamboree Interceptor Sewer and Pump Station; and
WHEREAS, on January 23, 1979, the Board of Directors of the District
approved the final Environmental _Impact Report regarding the Big Canyon
Drainage Area and. certified sai'd' report as being in compliance with the State
and District guidelines; and
WHEREAS, on January 15, 1980, the Board of Directors authorized soli-
citing proposals for the preparation of a supplemental Environmental Impact
Report needed; and
WHEREAS, on August 5, 1980, the District, through its consultant
retained to prepare the Supplemental Environmental Report, held an early
input meeting consistent with the requirements of law, and invited all
persons known to have an interest in this project to participate and comment
on the forthcoming preparation of the draft report; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980, the Board of Directors of the District
received and filed a Draft Environmental Impact Report regarding Sewerage
Improvements for ·the Big Canyon Drainage Area, establishing a comment period
to close on November 7, 1980. Copies of said report were presented to the
State Clearing House and mailed to all known interested parties; and
WHEREAS, on October 10, 19_80, the Districts _filed an application
to the Coastal Zone Conservation Commission -South Coast Regional Commission
for the permit to construct the Backbay Gravity Line Sewer; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 1980, the District published in the Orange
Coast Daily Pilot, the Notice of Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental
Impact Report, said Public Hearing to be held October 29, 1980; and
3.
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1980, the Notice of Completion of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report was posted in four locations along the project
route; and
WHEREAS, on October 29, 1980, the Districts conducted a Public
Hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report at which
time numerous persons were present and presented testimony relative to the
proposed project to the District Board; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 1980, which was established as the last day
to receive written comments on· the Draft Environmental Impact Report., ~
)
"---'~ written comments have---been received by the Clerk of this Board and which
·written comments ate hereby received and filed and made a part of the
record; and
WHEREAS, on November 10, 1980, a Final Environmental Impact Report
was prepared taking into consideration all comments received, both verbal
and written, which final report has been presented to this Board of Directors
for their consideration.
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does hereby
find, determine, and order as follows:
1. Each of the recitals set forth above are hereby determined to be
'fl~/,
findings of this Board and are incorporated herein by reference as tj:l.9-se set
lffe-q~ .fol
forth at ~ hereat and shall be deemed substanti vef ~visions ELB±tf" 1 • ' gs
of this resolution.
2. The Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State guide-
lines and the Districts' adopted guidelines.
3. The Board has considered all testimony and evidence submitted by
interested persons pertaining to this project and has considered each of the
three alternative projects at length, taking into consideration the relative
mitigation measures available to each project, together with the environmental
impact created by each alternative project.
4. That adequate mitigation measures have been established to mini-
mize the significant environmental effects identified in the Final Environ-
mental Impact Report pertaining to the construction of the Backbay Line.
5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 30253,
the project alternative of construction of the Back~ay Line is the alternative
which provides the greatest minimization of energy consumption.
6. .That the Final Environmental Impact Report regarding sewerage
PASSED AND ADOPTED at this regular meeting of the Board of Directors
on this 12th day of November, 1980.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-174-5
APPROVING 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRO~IENTAL IMPACT
REPORT RE SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR BIG C~~ON DRAINAGE
AREA, AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ·STATE AND DISTRICT GUIDELINES
IMPLEMENTING 1HE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, in early 1976, the Board of Directors received a report by
its staff indicating deficiencies in the sewerage facilities serving the
Big Canyon drainage area, together with a recommendation for a study to
determine the possible ways of alleviating the deficiencies; and,
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1976, the Board of Directors received and filed
an Environmental Assessment prepared by the District's staff concerning a
possible Back Bay-Trunk Sewer (east side); and,
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors, by resolution duly
adopted, approved a negative declaration pertaining to the preparation of
plans and specifications for a Back Bay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station
to Newport Dunes, generally in conformance with the District's 1969 Master
Plan Report; and,
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, the Board of Directors approved plans and
specifications for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer from Jamboree Pump Station to Newport
Dunes. Plans and specifications were for the construction of additional
facilities due to deficiencies in sewerage improvements located in the Big
Canyon drainage area; and,
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1976, a Supplemental Environmental Assessment,
prepared by the District's staff pertaining to the proposed Back Bay Trunk
Sewer, was received and filed by the Board of Directors with instructions
to prepare the necessary Environmental Impact Report relating thereto; and,
v i
WHEREAS, on June 8, 1977, the District's Board of Directors approved
the revised.plans arid specifications for the proposed Back Bay Trtmk Sewer; and,
WHEREAS, on July 16, 1977, the Board of Directors received and filed
a summary of the project and proposed conditions for completion thereof,
pertaining to the Back· Bay Trunk Sewer; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the coastal zone and, therefore,
subject to the State Coastal Act, thereby necessitating approval by the California
Coastal Commission, South Coast Regional Commission; and,
WHEREAS, upon completion of all environmental assessments, the District
submitted an application to the California Coastal Commission, South Coast
Regional Commission, requesting approval of the proposed construction of the
gravity-flow line, referred to as the Back Bay Trunk Sewer line; and,
WHEREAS, the South Coast Regional Commission approved the gravity line
for issuance of a coastal permit. Said approval was appealed and the
application was subsequently denied by the State Coastal Commission on
September 21, 1977; and,
WHEREAS, in early 1978, the District's staff had made determinations
that the deficiencies of the sewerage drainage facilities for the Big C~yon
drainage area were of serious and urgent nature and so reported such to the
Board of Direc~ors; and,
WHEREAS, on September 13, 1978, the Board of Directors of the District
received and filed a Project Report for the Big Canyon drainage area which
evaluated in greater detail other alternate methods for sewerage collection
for the Big Canyon drainage area than previously considered; and,
WHEREAS,. on November 15, 1978, the Board of Directors received and
filed a draft report on alternative ·facilities for the Big Canyon drainage
area; and,
-2-
WHEREAS, on November 15, 1978, the Board of Directors approved a
Draft Environmental Impact Report for proposed alternative facilities,
including Jamboree Interceptor Sewer and Pump Station; and,
WHEREAS, on January 23, 1979, the Board of Directors of the District
approved the Final Environmental Impact Report regarding the Big Canyon
drainage area and certified said report as being in compliance with the
State and District guidelines; and,"
WHE.REAS, on January 15, 1980, the Board of Directors authorized
soliciting proposals for the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report needed; and,
WHEREAS, on August 5, 1980, the District, through its consultant
retained to prepare the Supplemental Environmental Report, held an early
input meeting consistent with the requirements of law, and invited all
persons known to have an interest in this project to participate and comment
on the forthcoming preparation of the draft report; and,
WHEREAS, on October 8, 1980, the Board of Directors of the District
received and filed a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report regarding
Sewerage Improvements for the Big Canyon Drainage Area, establishing a comment
period to close on November 7, 1980. Copies of said report were presented
to the State Clearinghouse and mailed to all known interested parties; and,
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1980, the District filed an application to
the California Coastal Commission, South Coast Regional Cornmission, for the
permit to construct the Back Bay gravity-line sewer; and,
WHEREAS, on October 14, 1980, the.District published in the Orange
Coast Daily Pilot, the Notice of Public Hearing on the Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report; said public hearing to be held October 29, l980; and,
-3-
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1980, the Notice of Completion of the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was posted in four locations along
the project route; and,
WHERE~, on October 29, 1980, the District conducted a Public Hearing
to receive connnents on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report,
at which time numerous persons were present and presented testimony relative
to the proposed project to the District's Board; and,
WHEREAS, on November 7, 1980, which was established as the last day to
receive connnents on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, written
comments were received by the Clerk of this Board, which written comments are
hereby received and filed and made a part of the record; and,
WHEREAS, ·on November 10, 1980, a Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report was prepared, taking into consideration all comments received,
both verbal and writ~en, which final report has been submitted to this Board
of Directors for its co~sideration.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of CoWlty Sanitation District
No. S of Orange CoWlty, California,
DOES HEREBY ~IND, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1. That each of the recitals set forth above are hereby
determined to be findings of this Board and are incorporated herein by
reference as though set forth at length hereat and shall be deemed substantive
provisions of this resolution; and,
.Section 2. That the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report has
been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, As Amended, the State guidelines.and the District's adopted guidelines; and,
Section 3. That the Board has considered all testimony and evidence
submitted by interested persons pertaining to this project and has considered
'...,_/ each of the three alternative projects at length, taking into consideration the
-4-
.; ,
relative mitigation measures available to each project, together with
the environmental impact created by each alternative project; and,
""-'
Section 4. That adequate mitigation measures have been established
to minimize the significant environmental effects.identified in the Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report pertaining to the construction of
the Back Bay line; and,
Section 5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code,
Section 30253, the project alternative of construction of the Back Bay line
is the alternative which provides the greatest minimization of energy
consumption; and,
Section 6. That the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
regard~ng Sewerage Improvements for the Big Canyon Drainage Area, dated
November 10', 1980, is hereby approved and certified, and the Board hereby
determines that it may proceed immediately to consider the proposed project
of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer for approval.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors
held November 12, 1980.
-5-
TOM:
X REF : BOARD EIR GU IDELINS Section 15088
Afte r certifiaation of the E I R as as adequate , and when
after deliberation, if the District (#5) con c ludes that the
Back Bay Gravity alternative is the favored a l ternative and approves
that alternative as the ''Project", the Board in making its decision
should make the following findings:
1. Approve the Back Bay gravity sewer
line al t ern ative (as approved and
con d itio n ed bythe Coastal Commission ,
South Coast Region on 11/10/80)
2. Changes h ave been required a nd incorporated
into the project--notably the Fish & Game
a nd Coastal Commission conditions , and
mitigation measures desc ribed in the F inal
EIR --wh ich avoid and mitigate the
significant environmental effects
described in the Final EIR; and
3.Specific economic and other considerations ,--
e .g. energy costs, capital costs and
the possib l e unreliability of pumping
alternatives make the project alternatives
described in the Final EIR Infeasibl e .
•
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 1980
TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
FROM: DISTRICTS' STAFF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
REGARDING: INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 1-330
CHERRY FASTENERS -TOWNSEND DIVISION OF
TEXTRON, INC. 1224 E. WARNER AVENUE,
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA.
The following is a brief sununary taken from the Inspector's
Weekly Logs bet~een October 27, and November 10, 1980.
10/27: Began 30-day sample program. Inspection of the
plating facility showed no changes or modifica-
tions within the plating area.
Mr. Woolsey expressed difficulty in having
Cadmium-Cyanide solution from the holding tank
hauled away. Conunented that, "I (we) may have
to have an accidental spill". Suggested
direct piping of rinse water to eliminate the
wet floor. Reply was, "that would create an
undesirable sludge build-up".
10/28: Sample appeared normal. Informed Mr. Woolsey's
secretary that all samples would be acidified
inside our Laboratory for safety precautions.
10/29: Sample normal.
10/30: Sample normal.
10/31: Bottles at 1830 and 1930 were pink. Mr. Woolsey
did not know what it was. He stated, "You can
tell people not to dump things, but you can't
really control them".
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 1980
Page 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOR~~~~2708
(714) 540-2910 ---·--.
(714) 962-2411
11/01: Partial sample (11 hours) battery malfunction.
Explained to Mr. Woolsey that it would be used
as an indicator only.
11/02: Sample normal.
11/03: Sample normal, Bottle 0200 dark blue.
11/04: Mr. Woolsey said the blue bottle from the pre-
vious day was from an overflow of their nickel-
strike tank. Amount lost and concentration
unknown. Cadmium-Cyanide solution to be hauled
to Class I dump today. Mr. Woolsey stated that
he was afraid that his company would exceed the
Health Department limit for Cyanide hauling.
11/05: Sample normal. Excavation started at proposed
treatment facility.
11/06: All bottles somewhat yellow. Cherry Rivet had
a Cadmium-Cyanide spill, approximately 100
.gallons at a concentration of 2 to 2.5 oz./gal.
or about 15 pounds of Cadmium.
11/07: Sample normal.
11/08: Battery malfunction -no sample.
11/09: Sample appeared normal; slightly yellow, some
reddish sediment.
11/10: Sample normal. Mr. Woolsey is questioning the
permit in regards to the calculation of process
discharge. Inspection of plating area revealed
no changes to operation or design of area.
f .• i
I.
RE: AGENDA ·lTEM .. #3l(c) ~ DISTRICT 5
Written comments ·received since public hearing
on October 29th re Draft Supplemental EIR on
Sewerage Improvements for Big Canyon Drainage
Area:
(1) City of Newport Beach, Planning Department
dated November 5, 1980
(2) County of Orange, Environmental Management
Agency, dated November 5, 1980
(3) State of California, Office of Planning
and Research, dated November 6, 1980
(4) Department of the Army, Los Angeles Corps
of Engineers, dated November 7, 1980
-CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
November 5, 1980
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
Post Office 3ox 8127
Founta i n Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mrs . Hil .:i.ry J. Baker
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(.7 14) 640 -21 37
Subject: Draft EIR: Sewerage Improvements
Big Canyori Drainage Area
Dear Mrs. Baker:
The Planning Department of the City of Newport Beach appreciates
th i s opportunity to review and comment on the above subject
document. The Ci ty of Newport Beach is or may be a Responsible
Agency for the proposed project, depending on which alternative
is selected and the mitigation measures wh i ch are f inally in-
corporated into the project desig n. I f the Ci ty of Newport
Beach is or becomes a Responsible Agency for aspects of this
project, including its mitigation measures, the City may deem it
necessary to require more detai l ed information in accordance with
the 11 State EIR Guidelines.11 After a careful examination of the
environmental, economic and engineering data contained within
the subject document, the Planning Department offers the follow -
ing comments :
1 . The s ub ject document is adeq u ate for the proposed project
and has been prepared in accordanc e with the California
Environme n tal Quality Act (CEQA) a n d 11 The State EIR -
Guideline s .11
2 . The City may require the preparat i on of add it ional environ-
me n tal documentation as provided for in the 11 State EIR
Guidelines 11 i n resp ect to various aspects of the project
and mitigation meas ures proposed, if City permits are
required .
3 . The Planning Departme n t supports the proposed construction
of the southerly alignment of the Back Bay Trunk Gravity
Sewer Al ternative.
City Ha ll • 3300 Newport Bou levard, Newport Beach , Cal ifo rni a 92663
County Sanitation District No. 5
Page 2
November 5, 1980
4. The public benefits derived from the southerly alignment
of the Back Bay Gravity Sewer Alternative outweigh the
anticipated adverse impactswhen balanced with said impacts
and giving them greater weight.
5. That the mitigation measures present in the Draft EIR should
be incorporated into any project approval.
6. That the southerly alignment of the Back Bay Trunk Gravity
Sewer Alternative adequately meets the purpose of the
project and will provide benefits to the City of Newport
Beach by providing adequate sewerage for the City's plan-
ned growth and will improve the reliability of the
District's facilities.
7. That based upon the information contained within the
Environmental Document that the potential for damage
from groundshaking with a seismic event can be reduced
to insignificance through mitigation measures requiring
proper engineering practices.
8. That the removal of vegetation and subsequent disturbance
of habitat can be reduced and/or compensated for by replac-
ing or providing substitute resources or environments.
Further, that this impact must be balanced with the positive
public benefits of the project. This impact is of short-
term and does not appear to be long-term and permanent in
nature. ~-
9. That the potential disruption of Clapper Rail foraging and
late nesting activities and disru~tion of migratory bird
use and habitat is a short-term impact and not a long-term
and permanent impact. Further, that based upon this the
impact when balanced with the public benefits of the project
should be overridden in accordance with the "State EIR Gui de-
li nes. 11
10. That the closure of Back Bay Drive will not be a significant
adverse impact on the circulation system of the City of
New po rt Beach nor wi 11 it deny access to the State Eco 1 ogi ca 1
Reserve.
11. That the growth and development of the service area as des-
cribed in the Draft Environmental Document is consistent
with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of New-
port Beach as expressed within our General Plan and Zoning
Regulations. That environmental documentation has been and
will be prepared on each project in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the "State EIR
Guidelines,11 and City Policy.
County Sanitation District No. 5
P.·.ge 3
November 5, 1980
If the Planning Department can be of any assistance to you in
the review of this document, please feel free to contact us
(714) 640-2197.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director
by \w~2 FRED TALARICO
Environmental Coordinator
FT/kk
cc: Newport Beach City Council
"'. -,,:
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY
ADVANCE PLANNING
811 NORTH·BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
(714) 834-4643
November 5, 1980
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mrs. Hilary J. Baker
FILE
Subject: DEIR -Sewage Improvements in Big Canyon Drainage Area
Dear Mrs. Baker:
MURRAY STORM
DIRECTOR
RICHARD G. MUNSEL ...
ASSISTANT DIRECTO R
ADVANCE PLANNING
MAI L ING ADDRESS:
P .O. BO X 4048
SANTA ANA , CA 92702
GSRON68
The Environmental Management Agency has reviewed the subject document and has
the following comments to relate:
1. Air Quality
The EIR combines the Air Quality Section with the Noise Section. This
is not a logical combination and should be changed to reflect two separate
environmental issues.
Page 4-16, para. 7 -the air q u ality setting should include the existing
data on air pollutants from the nearest monitoring station.
The setting on page 4-16 does not adequately describe the climate and
meteorology of the area. For example, wind patterns in the area should
be discussed in order to provide b ackground for subsequently describing
any possible odor impacts associated with the project.
Page 4-17, para. 1 -the Air Quality Impacts Section should include
approximations of pollutants emitted by construction equipment. Require-
ments for calculating construction equipment emissions can be found in
the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Air Quality Handbook,
1977.
2 . Noise
Noise Section fails to address the noise generation capability of any
of the proposed alternatives . Of c oncern is the establishment of a
new pumping facility that could create noise impacts. This area should
be addressed.
Page 2
Thank you for the opportunity to review this environmental document. Please
forward a copy of the Final EIR when it becomes available.
MJG:mlt
Very truly yours,
~.7:/ee_p_
Kenneth E. Smith, Manager
Environmental Analysis Division
~
GOVERNOR·s OFFICE
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
1400 TENTH STREET
SACRAMENTO 95814
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.
GOVERNOR
November 6, 1980.
Hillary Baker
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
SUBJECT: SCH# 80100951 SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS BIG CANYON DRAINAGE
AREA
Dear Ms. Baker:
The Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Department
of Fish and Game have commented on your draft environmental impact
report. Should you have any questions regarding their concerns
or reconunendatipns, please contact the staff whose names and
addresses appear on the attached comment letters. Their comments
are sununarized below.
Regional· Water Quality Control -ao·ard
The Regional Water Control Board is concerned that erosion-
siltation during the project's construction will negatively impact
upper Newport Bay. They recommend that construction during the
non-rainy season be considered to help mitigate this impact~
An erosion-siltation control plan must be submitted to the Board.
Any dewatering activities require an NPDES permit.
Department of Fish and Game
The Department believes Alternative 3 would be the least · · .·
environmentally damaging. However, if Alternative 1 is selected,
the twenty conditions listed in their comment letter must be met.
Most of these conditions relate to the construction phase of the~
project. Ini,addition, the District will investigate the cost to
stabilize the vehicle pullout areas and will look at existing
roadway drainage improvements. Potential short and long-term .
impacts upon biotic resources due to project maintenance should
be identified and mitigated in the EIR. Finally, the Department
strongly recommends that removal of spoil material in Big Canyon
be included as part of the project. Any alteration within the
high water mark of a streambed will require prior notification
of Fish and Game.
You may formally respond to the agencies' comments by writing
'.._,/ to them (including the State Clearinghouse number on all corres-
pondence) • When filing the final EIR, you must include all comments
and responses (State EIR Guidelines, Section 15146). State review
of your draft EIR will then be complete.
Thank you for this opportunity to comment on your draft document.
Please contact Sonia Binnendyk at (916) 445-0613 if you have any
questions.
.........~1~ on
learinghouse
cc: Ken Fellows, DWR.
Resources Agency of California
Memorandum . /
To James W. Burns, Project Coordinator
The Resources Agency
. Resources Building, 13th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Date: October 23,. 1980
From : California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region
6809 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE ZOO, RIVERSIDE, CA 92506 ( 8-632-4130)
Subiect: SCH#80100951 -SEWERAGE .IMPROVEMENTS-BIG CANYON DRAINAGE AREA, ORANGE COUNTY
We have reviewed this Draft EIR for the proposed sewerage system for the
Big Canyon Area. Our main concern regarding this project is the potential
for adversely impacting upper Newport Bay as a result of erosion-siltation
during construction. The EIR should address this issue in detail. An
erosion-siltation control plan must be submitted to this office for review
prior to any construction activity. One way to mitigate erosion-siltation
effects would be to schedule the construction only during the non-rainy
season, April 15 through September 15. We reconunend that this alternative
be considered.
In addition, if there is any likelihood of dewatering during the construc-
tion of this project, an NPDES-pennit would be necessary. No discharge of
wastes can legally commence until an NPDES pennit has been issued. The
processing of such a pennit can take up to 180 days after the NPDES appli-
cation has been detennined as complete.
Please call if you have any questions.
--~ /.. . /-,· ~ \._)~~ ..
., , I.,,< ·-/a Hisam A. Baqai /
Staff ~ngineer
HAB:db
.·'1
/state of California The Resources Agency · .... =
Memo·randum
From
Subiect:
1. Jim Burns, Projects Coordinator
Resources Agency
2. Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
Post Q.ffice Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Department of Fish and Game
Date: November 3 , 19 80
... •·= --:·-:. : ·· --
-=
SCH 80100951 -Sewerage I1nprovements· Big Canyon Drainage Area
We have reviewed the draft EIR for the subject doctiment -~that describes three
alternative construction projects to resolve the reiiaBility·and capacity · :
problems of wastewater collection and transport within -the ·Big Canyo.n drainage
system. We have the following comments for your c~~s~de~ation. -
We find that the EIR provides a generally adequate~assessment of the potential
impacts.to the biotic resources within the project:~rea, particularly ·the Big
Canyon region and the Upper Newport Bay Ecological ReserV-e.
The natural resources within Big Canyon and Upper New"Port _,Bay contrlii significant ·
productive and valuable wildlife resources which should ·be --given maximum protection.·
In considering project proposals, the Department prefers that the least-environmen~
tally damaging project alternative be selected. In_~~ur.-View, Alternative ·3 -
Jamboree Road Tunnel, would be the least da111aging. =-However~ if~Alternative 1 -
Back Bay Line is selected, the following condition~ must be met~
.--.
1. The District inspector shall have the authority and shall
enforce all requirements of the approved Plans and Specifi-
cations.
2. Construction equipment and spoil material shall be C·Onfined
to the existing· hard road surface of Back Bay Drive, excepting
the Big Canyon section inland from Back Bay Drive and where
replacement of additional drain culverts are required.
3. The surveyed route of the project shall be inspected by Fish
and Game prior to approval of final engineering plans, The
Department of Fish and Game would not object to the southerly
route through Big Canyon provided the following conditions are
met:
A. The construction carridor through Big Canyon shall be
no more than 15 feet wide except in areas agreed by
the. Department of Fish and Game.
B. The sewer line will be constructed as close to the
hillside as possible to avoid encroachment on the
riparian resource.
;· .. (
' l. Jim Burns
2. Orange County Sanitation
District No. 5 -2 -November 3, 1980
C. The construction right-of-way will be revegetated within
the time frame specified in SA of the Department's ~ondi~.
tions for construction (see below).
D. The sediment retention capabilities of the rip;inan ~o~Unity
within Big Canyon shall be retained and p-rotected. · · -·
E. Adverse impacts to aquatic resources resulting -from routing
and emergency maintenance activities will be mitigated by the
restoration of these resources to-the co~d.;l..t.ion.~~hich. existed
prior· to such activities. Native plant species will. be used.
4. The District shall insure that a qual.±f±ed archaeologist wi11 c~nduct~a
library search of historical sites and walk over the surveyed route
prior to trenching to determine pre-project excavation needs.
5. The District shall allow archaeologist and pal:eontologist.inspection
of core samples obtained during the soil and ..:geologic surveys.
--· ------...... ----·
6. The District shall avoid historical sites or:provide assessment andlor
adequate salvage time.
7. Project construction shall be between August-l-and. December 15.
Construction delays through archaeological or~paleontological inspec~
tions or salvage may extend the deadline by mutual agreement of the
District and the Department. __ . __ , _ _ ---.:. ~ ----__ .
8, The District shall construct the project in. segments· •. ·._
A.. Big Canyon shall be constructed and completed'. between August 1
and October 15 including soil stabilization. _ .
B. Back Bay Drive from Big Canyon to San Joaquin Hills Road-shall ..
have no t:fllle fra111e restriction except during the cont~act period~
C. The reach between San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Dunes is
critical. Construction must begin after November 1 and must be.
completed by DecembeT 15.
D. The reach from Newport Dunes to the entrance of Shellmaker Island
shall have no tilne frame restrictions other than the construction
period.
9. Th.e District shall provide one connection at Shellmaker Island entrance.
10. The District will provide 111easures to completely offset or replace any
damage or losses to terrestrial and/oT 1118.rine ecosystems as a result of
District's construction activities as determined by the Department of
Fish and Game.
·' 1.. Jim Burns
2. Orange County Sanitation
District No. 5 -3 -, November 3, 1980
11. The District shall confonn to City standards in the resurfacing.
of Back Bay Drive. · ··
12. The District shal1 obtain an easement as needed from the Department.
13. A temporary, movable barrier shall be erected at the bayside-edge· -·
of the Back Bay Drive pa-vement if the project biologist determines
during construction that such a screen is necessary. (The District
shall decide the materials of construction of the screen and shall be__
able to erect said scr~en in a reasonable period of time-if ·deter-
mined necessary.)
14. Pneumatic equipment shall not be used within that~section of the
project extending along Back Bay Drive.
15. The daily construction shall be monitored by a qualified biologist
who shall be a representati-ve of Fish and Game. While ·the· _biologist. __
may be a graduate student, only an official of· Fish and-Game-shall
have the authority to request the District's inspector to suspend
or stop any damaging· activities caused by the Contractor pursuant to
contractural authority. The Orange County Sanitation Dis.trict shall
reimburse the Department for reasonable costs of said monitoring.
·----... ·--·
16. Back Bay Road may be closed during construction as_ long-as-local
access is provided.
17. The District shall not permit any sewer hookups from the San Joaquin
Hills Road southerly along Back Bay Drive to the reserve· boundary· that-
would affect the bluffs along that section. One connection shall be
provided at San Joaquin Hills Road.
18. Sewer pipe shall be ductile cast iron with mechanical joints.
19. Sewer pipe connections shall be at Shellmaker Island and· San· Joaquin-----
Hills Road.
20. A pressure system shall be retained as emergency backup-· in the event
of system failure for a period of one year from the date of-acceptance
of the contract work oy the Sanitation Distric~ No. 5 Board of Directors.
In addition to the above, tbe District will investigate the cost to stabilize the
vehicle pullout areas and will look at existing roadway drainage improvements to
be identified by Fish and Game.
The potential shoTt and long-term impacts upon biotic resources within Big
Canyon due to project maintenance pTogTams should be identified in the EIR.
Should 111aintenance activities be required, specific measures to mitigate impacts
to -those resources should be p-rovided, including measures to reestablish native
plants removed by such acti'Vities.
}' t'l 1 . ~ • Jim Burns
2. O~~e Count:r Sanitation
.Dtst'l'f ct No. 5 4 -·--November 3, -i98o--
Big Canyon contains valuable riparian and freshwater enviro~ents :that provide
habitat for a wide variety of wildlife and aquatic resources.-.. The resource ---
value within this area would be substantially improved if existing fish and
wildlife resources are increased beyond that which now exist~. The Department
would view the removal of the spoil material in Big Canyon as·a pasfd.ve step·
towards increasing biotic resource values within this area and the adjacent
Ecological Reserve, and we strongly recommend that this -be ac·complished aa· -
par;·~of the project. · --: --~.~ -·· __ -·_.
Any· alt~ration within the high water .. ma.rk of any streambed w£lr-recju±re-;notifi--_-:_ ---
cation to the Department of Fish and Game pursuant to Sectiorl-~1601 o:f--clie Fish · ·· -·
and Game Code. This notification and the subsequent agreement-·must be completed
prior to commencement of the streanlbed alteration.
. --... -~· ---. --· ---------_.. -.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project, ::.:-If--you have
any questions, please contact Mr. Fred A. Worthley, Jr. , Reg~onal Manager of
Region 5, at 350 Golden Shore, Long ·Beach, California 90-S02, -·~·el~phone .:. • -~~. _
(213) 590-5113.
DirectOT
---------· -. . ·-
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 2711
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90093
SPLED-E 7 November 1980
Mrs. Hilary J. Baker
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County
California
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mrs. Baker:
This is in response to a letter from your office dated 9 October 1980
which requested· review and comments on the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (DEIR) for "Sewerage Improvements, Big Canyon Drainage Area."
The proposed plan does not conflict with existing or authorized plans
of the Corps of Engineers.
We have determined that there is insufficient evidence of potential
adverse impacts to the federally listed endangered Light-footed Clapper
Rail in those portions of the proj.ect site, and within the purview of
Section 404, to warrant a Section 7 Consultation. Therefore, the
activity is permitted under a Nationwide Permit, provided the action
camplies with the management practices contained in the inclosure
"Nationwide Permit." In this regard, we also suggest that the text
ef section "Federal Involvement," page 3-9 of the DEIR, be amended
aecordingly.
If you have any questions regarding permit·jurisdiction, etc., please
feel free to contact Mr. Forester Einarsen, Environmental Quality
Sectian, telephone (213) 688-5405, at your convenience.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this document.
Sincerely,
1 Incl
As stated Division
. ~.
NATIONWIDE PERMIT
Th~ following is a list of management practices and conditions mentioned
1n Part 323, Section Ji3.4 and 323.4.;..2,. Volume 42, of the Federal
Register, dated 19 July 1977. •
!_, -:--:
a. Conditions required for the discharge of dredged or fill =aterial
pJa~ed ,or: . backfill or bedding for utility line crossings. provided
there i~ no change in precoristruction bo~tom contours; bank stabilization.
provided it.is·less than 500 linhar feet. necessary for erosion prevention 0
limited to.less than an average of 1 cubic yard per foot,·no material
placed in ~etlands and no material placed so as to impair surface water
flo'1s; minor road crossing fi11s that are part of a crossing of a non-
tidal vater body, provided it is culverted or bridged to prevent restric-
tion of high no,.,s, less than 200 cubic yards of fill material discharged
belCJ\1·the ordinary high Yater mark. discharge into the wetland· adjacent
to the \Jaterbody do not extend beyond 100 feet on either side of· .the ordi-
nary high Yater mark; fill placed incidental to bridge construction across
tidal waters includine coffer dams, abutments, foundation seals. piers and
temporary-construction and access fills; and the renair, rehabilitation,'
or replacement of any pre~iously authorized currently serviceable fill.
or of any currencly serviceable fill discharges prior to the requirements
for authorization, provided repairs, rehabilitntion or replacement does
not result in deviation from the specifications or purpose of the origi-:
nal work.
(l) The discharge will tiot be located in the proximity of a public.
vater supply intake.
(2) The discharge will not occur a areas of ·concentrated shell-..
f isb production.
(3) The discharge vill not destroy a threatened-or endangered. species
as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critical
habitat of such species •
·(4) The discharge lrl.11 not disrupt the movement of those species of
.aquatic life indigenous to the va~erbody.
(5) The discharge vill consist of s\sitable material free· from toxic
pollutants in other than trace quantities.
-(6) nie fill created by'the discharge 111111.be properly maintained
to prevent erosion and other non-point sources of p_o1lution.
(7) The discharge "1'111 not occur in a component of the National Yild
and Scenic River System or in a component of a State llild and scenic river
system.
' .. _ . '
'b. Conditions required for the discharge of dredge9 or fill material
into: non-tidal rivers, streams and their imooundments ~including adja-
..... _
cent vetlands, located above the headwaters; natural lakes including their
adjacent vetlands, that are less than 10 acres in surface area, fed by · a
stream above the headwaters; natural lak es, including their adjac·ent wet-
lands that are less than 10 acres and are isolated and not part of a stream;
and other non-tidal waters of the United States other than isolated lakes
larger than 10 acres that are not part of a surf ace tributary system to
interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States.
(1) The discharge will not destroy a threatened or endangered species
as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or endanger the critical
habitat of such species.
(2) "n1e discharge will consist of suitable material free from toxic
pollutants in other than trace quantities.
(3). The fill created by the discharge -will be properly maintained
to prevent erosion and other non-point sources of p~llution.
(4) · "nle discharge will not occur in a component of the National Wild
and Scenic River& System or in a component of ~ state v.tld and scenic river
sy_;Ste.m.
c. These m.anagCI!lent practices should also be followed in addition
to the conditions stated in 4 and b above.
(1) Discharges of dredRcd or fill material into ~aters of the United
States should be avoided or minicized through the use of other pract~cal
alternatives.
(2) Discharues in spawning are.as during spat·ming seasons should be
avoided.
(3) Discharges should not restrict or ir.lpede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the paesap,e of normal or c~ected
high flowc or cause the relocation of the wnters (unless the primary pur-
pos~~of the f111 is to impound waters).
~n
~'._; .· ~) If tlre dis~harge create~ an iDpo~dment weter, adverse impacts
-on the nquatic systcn caused by the acceler3ted passaee cf water nod/or
~the ~~tr~ion of its flow, should be c.ioimized. LJ ,! ~ •
~". ~ n'&charges in wetlc.nd areas should be avoided.
c: (~ Heavy equipment -working in wetlands should be ·placed on mats.
(7) Discharrres into breeding and n~sting areas for migratory water-
fowl should· be avoided.
(8) All temporary fills should be removed in their entirety.
If the dischnrge meets the abvve stated conditions and manap,ement prac-
tices, an individual permit should not be necessary to satiofy the requirc-
m(!l1tS of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Ac~ndments of 1972.
11/12/80
Agenda Item No. 16 -Possible items for consideration following Executive session
re personnel matters
(a) Consideration of motion approving Memoranda of Understanding with Districts'
Administrative/Clerical Employee Unit, Laboratory Employee Unit, and Orange
County Employees Association re Operations and Mlintenance Employee Unit,
effective November 28, 1980, in accordance with Board approved guidelines
for salary and benefit adjustments, provided that the respective units ratify
and execute Memoranda of Understanding on or before November 28, 1980, pursuant
to the meet-and-confer process presently under way.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 80-175, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and Terms and Conditions of Employment
Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, re changes in salaries and benefits for
Administrative/Clerical, Laboratory and Operations and Maintenance Employee
Units, effective November 28, 1980, in accordance with Board approved guidelines
for salary and benefit adjustments, provided that the respective units ratify
and execute Memoranda of Understanding on or before November 28, 1980, pursuant
to the meet-and-confer process presently under way.
(c) Consideration of motion declaring intent to make Memoranda of Understanding
with Supervisory Employee Unit and Engineering/Industrial Waste Employee Unit
effective November 28, 1980, provided that the respective units ratify and
execute lvemoranda of Understanding on or before December 10, 1980, pursuant
to the meet-and-confer process.
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS.OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
~ A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 7:30 p.m., November 12 , 1980, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7: 30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DISTRICT 1
Adj·ournmen t
* * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 4: 30 p. m.,
Wednesday, November 26, 1980. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
·adjourned at 8:50 p.m., November 12, 1980.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true
and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on
the 12th day of November , 1980 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I
19 80 •
S-107
,..,¥-..... we Boards of Directors
ation Districts Nos.
, 7, and 11
11-12-80
REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
I HAVE ESTABLISHED A SAFETY GUIDANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE
PURPOSE OF REVIEWING AND MONITORING THE DISTRICTS' PERSONNEL
SAFETY PROGRAM. BECAUSE OF HIS VAST EXPERIENCE AS A PROFESSIONAL
SAFETY ENGINEERJ I HAVE APPOINTED DON FOX TO CHAIR THIS COMMITTEE.
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT FROM THIS
SAFETY COMMITTEE ON A SEMI-ANNUAL BASIS BEGINNING JUNEJ 1981.
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO, 9-D ON REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT FROM
THE SANTA ANA RIVER BY THE COUNTYJ TO BE USED AS GENERAL FILL
MATERIAL BY THE DISTRICTS, THIS IS BEING HELD UP PENDING A PERMIT
FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERSJ WHICH DOES NOT LOOK TOO FAVORABLE
FOR THE COUNTY.
A DRAFT FEDERAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON
OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE. WILL RECOMMEND WHAT ROLE OCEANS SHOULD PLAY.
IN WASTE MANAGEMENT. THE DRAFT REPORT SAYS THAT FOR SEWAGE SLUDGEJ
"OCEAN DISPOSAL EITHER BY BARGE OR THROUGH A PIPE SHOULD CONTINUE
TO BE A DISPOSAL OPTION UNDER APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS
AND WITH ADEQUATE MONITORING SAFEGUARDS IN THOSE AREAS WHERE OUR
PRESENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE INDICATES ONLY MINIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL
HARM FROM SLUDGE DISPOSAL."
A RESEARCH PROJECT OF THIS NATURE IS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY
THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE AT THIS TIME.
.. .
TO DATEJ THE DISTRICTS HAVE RECEIVED $543J616,91 FR OM REFINERS
UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S DOMESTIC CRUDE OIL ENTITLEMENTS
PROGRAM, THIS PROGRAM IS DUE TO CONTINUE UNTIL OCTOBERJ 1981.
OUR ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST WERE $31J318,76.
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,1
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26TH, INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND
AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS:
JAMES WARD
""""" ~IL I P ANTHOJ!Y
~ARD EDG A°R)
VICKI EVANS
. . .
DISTRICT NO, 1 WILL MEET AT 4:30 P.M.J IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING,
~-
10/08/80
ALL DISTRICTS l -"Id-Jg 0
Joint Operating Fund $ 173,496 .45 ~~
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -1,631,325.42 Agenc~ li c:n No . <£
Joint Working Capital Fund 37,583.43
Self-Funded Insurance Funds 1'668. 84 2,527.57
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO . 2 226,197.87 9 ,802.35
DISTRICT NO. 3 130,234.11 20,551.98
DISTRICT NO. 5 77,089.92 11 '405. 52
DISTRICT NO. 6 15 .30 230.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 5,459.28 1 '4 38. 60
DISTRICT NO. 11 7,704.65 270,186.96
DISTRICTS NOS . 5 & 6 JOINT 7,525 .55 28,7 18.35
DISTRICTS NOS . 6 & 7 JOINT 2,037. 12
$2,300 ,337.94 $652,501 .98
MEET I NG DATE Nov· 12 ' 1980
DISTRICT 1
T I:"1E 7 : 30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3 ,5 ,6, 7&11
(SALTAREL~l) ••• SHARP •••••• ~ ----
!YAMAMOTO) •••• .tJJtftB;d ••••• ~ ---
R I LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY, P •• _.z;._ ----
CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON •• -lttt!!'----
DISTRICT 2
!FRIEDL~ •••••• WEDAA.. •••• ,/" __ --
SEYMOUR •••••• ROTH ••••••• ~ ___ _
WINTERS •••••• :88Rflll8P'r ••• ~ __ _
(GAMBINA •••••• ~ ••••••• ~
(ECKENRODE) •••• HOLT ••••••• ~---
!ODLUM) ••••••• KAWANAM I . . . ~ ----
WI EDER) ••••••• MILLER ••••• ,,,_... .. ~::::
CULVER) ••••••• PERRY •••••• ~
(BEYER) •••••••• SMITH •••••• ~ ----
(HOLLIND~N) •••• STANTON •••• ~ ----
(CORBETT) •••••• .WARB;BL •••• ~ = :::: ~WARD,J) ••••••• YAMAMOTO ••• ~--__
o·ISTRICT 3
COLLl~S) •••••• VAN DYKE ••• ~ ----
ROWAN) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ~ ---
HOLL I 1DEN) •••• ADLER •••••• ~ __ __
ROGET •••••••• CORBETT •••• ~ ---
PERRY •••••••• CULVER ••••• ~ ----
KIRKPATRICK) •• FINLAYSON •• ~ ---
MANO IC) ••••••• FINLEY ••••• ~--__
FOX) •••••••••• i Ol:H •.•••. ..M!!!:.. ___ _
SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO ••••• ~ --__
DAVIS) •••••••• REESE •••••• -lllf!!:_ ___ _
SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH ••••••• ~ ___ _
ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA ••••• ~
ROMAGN I NO) •••• WHEELER •••• _L_ ----
MILLER) ••••••• W l EDER ••••• ~=:::::
BORNHOfT) ••••• WINTERS •••• ~ __ _
WARD,,J) ••••••• YAMAMOTO ••• ~ __ _
DISTRICT 5
~MAURER) { •••••• HEATHER •••• ~ ----
STRAUSS J •••••• COX • • • • • • • ---
ANTHONY .1 P) •••• RI LEY • • • • • • ----
01 STRICT 6
(CRANK).< •••••• HUTCHISON •• ~ ----·
(HEATHERJ •••••• PLUMMER· •• ·~ ---
(RILEY) ••••••• 0 ANTHONY.1P· • ~ ---
DISTRICT 7
BEYER) •••• < ••• SMITH •••••• ~ ---
SALTAREU-IJ ···EDGAR······~ ----
HEATHER) •• • • • • HART. • • • • • • ~ ----
WI EDER) •••• ···MILLER····· _,, ---
ANTHONY,, A) • • • • VARDOUL IS • • ...x;... ---
HANSON) •••• • •• WAHNER. • • • • ~ --
YAMAMOTO) ••••• lCARD .1 J • • • • • _11111!!_ ----
DISTRICT 11
(BAILEY) ••••••• PATTINSON •• ~ ---
(MACALLJSTER) •• BAILEY ••••• ~ ---
(MILLER) •• • •• • • WI EDER •••• • JtJ!!!.. ---
10/8/80
JOINT BOARDS
HOLLHIDEN) ••••• ADLER •••••• ~ --
RILEY) ••••••••• ANTHONY ,P. -~ --
MACALL! STER) ••• BA I LEY ••••• ----
WINTERS) ••••••• HRffll8FT ••• 7--
ROGET) ••••••••• CORBETT •••• ----
STRAUSS l ....... COX ••••••• -~ --
PERRY) ••••••••• CUL VER ••••• ~ --
SAL TA~ELLI) •••• EDGAR •••••• ~ --
ROWANi). • • • • • • • • • EV ANS • • •••• -M!!::.. __ .
KIRKPATRICK) ••• FINLAYSON •• ~ __
MAND IC) •••••••• FINLEY ••••• ~
(GAMBINA) •••••• ~ ••••••• -~ --
HEATHER) ••••••• HART •••••• -~ --
MAURER) •••••••• HEATHER •••• ~ ---
ECKENRODEl ••••• HOLT •••••• -~ --CRA~Kl ••••••••• HUTCHISON.-~ =
FOX)····.· •••• •l8LEB ••••• Jt!!:_
ODLUM) •••••••• KAWANAMI •• ·-W!:.. --
SEITZ}·.· ••••• -LASZLO •••• ·~ =
WIEDERi········MILLER ••••• ~
BAILEY •••••••• PATTINSON.·~=
CULVER •••••••• PERRY •••••• ~
HEATHER) ••••••• PLUMMER •••• ~ ----
(DAVIS) ••••••••• REESE •••••• ~=
(ANTHONY,, P) ••••• RI LEY •••••• ~ _
(SEYMOUR) • • -· • ··ROTH. • • • • • • """' -
(SALTARELLI) •••• SHARP •••••• ~ -·
BEYER) • ········SMITH.·.... :::;. --HOLLIND~N) ····-STANTON.... --
ZOMMICK ·······SYLVIA ••••• ~ --
COLLINS ·······VAN DYKE·· • .A.!.. --
AHTHONY ,,A)···· ·VARDOULIS • -~ --
HANSON)······· ·WAHNER·····~ ----
!CORBETT) ••••••• ~B ••••• -=---
YAMAMOTO)····· •'1#:'cA8";4 • • • • ·~·-
FRIED)········ ·WEDAA • • • • • .~ -!ROMAGNJNO)·····WHEELER····~ ----
MILLER)······· ·WIEDER····-~ --
BORNHOFT) • • • • • ·WINTERS • • • ·-'ti!!!:.. --
(WARD,, J) ········YAMAMOTO···~ --
OTHERS
HARPER····· --
SYLVESTER··--
LEWIS······--
CLARKE·····-
BROWN······--ANDERSON ••• __
BAKER ••••• ·--
CONATSER •• ·--
DAWES ••••• ·--
FATLAND •••• _
YOUNG ••••• ·--
WOODRUFF •••
HOHENER •••• :::=
HOWARD·····--
HUNT •••••• ·--
KEITH •••••• _
LYNCH ••••• ·--MARTINSON •• __
STEVENS ••• ·--
MEET I NG DA. ·e Nov· 12 ' 1980
DISTRICT 1
Tii"1E 7 :3 o p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7&11
JOINT BOARDS
(SAL TARELt-1) ••• SHARP. • • • • • ~ ----HOLLI NDEN) • • • •• ADLER • • • • • • ~ --
!
YAMAMOTO) ••••• W~ •••• -;r-----RI LEY} ••••••••• ANTHONY ,P. ·----
RILEY}. ••••••• ANTHONY,P •• ~ ----MACALLISTER) ••• BAILEY ••••• ~ --
CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON •• -----WINTERS) •••• •• .BORNllO~T ••• ~ --
ROGET) ••••••••• CORBETT •••• -·---D ! STR l CT 2 STRAUSSl ••••••• cox ••••••.• ~ -
!FRIED) WEDAA J PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER ••••• ~ ----. 5...... . ..... ~ ----SALTA~ELLI) •••• EDGAR •••••• _v_ --
SEYMOUR •••••• ROTH.·.····~ ----!ROWAN). EVANS v ·
wINTERs> •••••• seRNiroFr.. • -:r ----KIRKP1Arriici<J:: :FINLAvsoN: :z =
(GAMBINA) ······Per..·· .... -----NDlC) FINLEY ""' (ECKENRODE) •••• HOLT ••••••• ~ __ _ MA • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ --
!ODLUM) ••••••• KAWANAMI... v' __ __ (GAMBINA) • • • • • • -~· • • • • ·--:::;r --
WI EDER~ Ml LLER -:T HEATHER) •• • •• • .HART ••••••• • • • • • • • • •••• -·-----MAURER) ••••••• -HEATHER •••• --:;---CULVE~ ·······PERRY·····. ~v · ECKEN~ODEl. ·.·-HOLT······· """7" --
BEYER).······ .SMITH.····· 19-fr-_ ~( RA~K HUTCHISON ----(HOLL I NDEN) •••• ST ANTON • • • • ~ '->?Jj o C • • • • • • • • • • • ~ --
(CORBETT) WAR'iITB: v ' -FOX • • • • • • • • • • .1-St:ES'7. • • • ·~ --
(WARD.,J).:::::: YAMAMOTO::: ---:7 --~ ODLUM) ••••••• -KAWANAMI •• -~ --
. ------~ SE nzl ........ -LASZLO • • • • • .,/ ri·ISTRICT 3 IEDER~ •••••••• MILLER ••••• ---::;--=
BAILEY l ........ PATTINSOr~ •• _L _
(COLLHIS) •••••• VAN DYKE ••• _f2:::_ __ __ ~CULVER J ••••••. PERRY •••••• ~ _
RO\'lAN) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ...L. _ -(HEATHE)R ••••••• PLUMMER •••• ~ __
HOLLINDEN) •••• ADLER •••••• _._.1_ ----DAVIS ••••••••• REESE ••••• -~ __
ROGET) •••••••• CORBETT •••• -L.. ---(ANTHONY 1 P) ••••• RI LEY ••.•••• ..L._ --
PERRY) •••••••• CULVER.····_:!__ ---(SEYMOUR) •• ... ···ROTH •••••• __ .,...,_ --
KIRKPATRICK) •• FINLAYSON •• _..;_ ---(SALTARELLI) •••• SHARP •••••• --=::.._ --.
MANt>IC) ••••••• FINLEY····· _v_ ----BEYER) •••••••• -SMITH ••••• ·-"".---FOX)··········~·····~ ----HOLLINDlN) ·····STANTON···-~ --
SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO·····~ ----ZOMMICK •••••• ·SYLVIA..... a_,.. --
DAVIS). •••• • •• REESE.·····+ ----COLLINS •••••• ·VAN DYKE···----
SEYMOUR) •• ••• .ROTH.······~ ----ANTHONY ,A) •••• ·VARDOULlS • -~ -
ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA.···· ------HANSON) ••••••• ·WAHNER ••••• ~ -
!
ROMAGN)INO).. • ·=HEEDE~~~~· • -7-----!CORBETT) ••••••• W~ ••••• -:::---
MILLER • • • • • • • I · · · -. ----YAMAMOTO) ••••• ·WARf>,J.' •• ·-·--
BORNHOFT) ••••• WINTERS.···~ ---FRIED) •••••••• ·WEDAA· •••• ·-"""--
WARD.1 J) • · • · • · ·YAMAMOTO· • • ------!ROMAGN I NO) • • • • ·WHEELER • • • • -L. --
Ml LLER) ········WIEDER·····~ --0 ISTRI CT 5 BORNHOFT) ••••• ·WINTERS ••••. --
!
) J (WARD,J) ···•·•··YAMAMOTO···.::::::... -. -MAURER < •••••• HEATHER •••• --r-----
STRAUSS J •••••• COX ••••• ~. ----
ANTHONY I p) •••• RI LEY •••••• _:L_ ---OTHERS
DISTRICT 6 //.~'/ e "Ti~ibt'N'~ HARPER. • • • • _.:!__
( K) HUTCHISON ./ l llf, ... ·r SYLVESTER·· ~ CRAN • ( • • • • • • • • -----1 ft1 """"' I LEW IS• • • • • • _v_
(HEATHERJ ••• ···PLUMMER· • • • _:!._ ---~ tJ I. , CLARKE ••••• -4-
(RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY .1 P • • ~ ----o-"' ~ev BROWN v u-...;·· I ..... ·--
DISTRICT 7
\/ BEYER) •••• t ••• SMITH •••••• -.;----
SALTAREL.LI J ···EDGAR······ -r----
HEATHER) • • • • • ·HART· • • • • • • ~ ----
WI EDER) ••• ••• -MILLER·····~ ---
ANTHONY .,A) •••• VARDOULIS· ·~ ------
HANSON) ••••••• WAHNER· • • • • -V------
YAMAMOTO)···· • WARD,J • • • • • ------
DISTRICT ll
!
BAILEY) ••••••• PATTINSON.· ~ ----
MACALLJSTER) •• BAILEY~~··~ ----
MILLER) •• • ••• -WIEDERW-'-. • ------
10/8/80
\1 Q' fJ.r, ANDERSON ••• ~ ~·L· ~ BAKER •••••• ~
a II f1 )Lv CONATSER •• ·+
'hr DAWES ••••• ·--
!.
e_ 1(;~ r" ,p FA TLAND •••• ---V-yVW~ · cJ f YOUNG •••••• _
Pr+r PR1e~
j t'rn m A~f,n: WOODRUFF ••• ~
HOHENER •••• ~
HOWARD····· v
HUNT ••••••• \7""
KEITH ••••• ·--
LYNCH ••••• ·--
MARTINSON •• __
STEVENS ••• ·--
11/12/80 JOINT MTG . NOTES
(7-a) Report of the Joint Chairman
See attached report .
Joint Chairman Vardoulis then referred to the trip to Washin g ton, D .C .
that Mr . Harpe r and Don Fox took wh e n they found out about the ·
domestic crude oil e ntitlements program . During that time some
picture s we re taken with vario us Congressmen . He then p res e nted
three fra me d p ictures to Do n Fox o f he and Biz Joh nson , Do n Clausen
and . "'u.-.t.. > ,.
Vardoulis also announced that Director Smith was planning on atte n d ing
the CASA meeting in Monterey but finds he can 't make it now , so asked
other Directors if anyone was interested in using his room reserva tion .
There were no comments at that time .
(7 -b) Report of the General Manager
FAH reported that one of our sludge trucks did the unforgiveable and
spil l ed his load. The staff is still l ooking into the report . Hope
that it isn 't going to happen again.
Also advised that we are going to be involved in an EPA 1990 strategy
meetings . The first will be in Washington , D .C . next week . Will have
some of the new administration transition team the re . Will give the
Directors the results of these meetings .
He then commented regarding recen t toxic concerns over hazardo u s
wastes being dumped. Advised that Ray Lewis and Ray Young had put
together a presentation on where we stand in that area of toxic materials .
Ray Lewis then narrated a slide presentation showing various industries
which discharge to the Districts and some of their facilities for
pretreatment. He also covered the progress we have made on each of
several heavy metals in meeting the discharge requirements we mu st
comply with.
Wieder asked if the County and State Health Department were working
with the Districts in doing anything as far as testing the three
unclassified l andfills in Orange County? REL answered that they were
not in use and we weren't doing any testing in them. He added that
there are no Class II sites in Orange County . She then asked if there
is any potential health hazards on those areas that are identified in
slides as Class I that are not i n use . REL stated we are not working
with County and don 't know what health hazards there are.
(9-f) Report of the General Counsel
TLW referred to the claim received re fly and odor problem. Was filed
on behalf of 76 families . Can 't take a c l aim that adds up to this
~ might too lightly but originates back when Districts had a sludge pile
in back . We we re aware of problem at the time and dealt with property
own e rs. Said the nature of the business here does cause the possibility
o f bad odors . What this really is is a n e ighborhood p e tition .
.....,,
Tom sa i d he wa s r e c ommendi n g th a t t hi s be summar ily deni ed . Added tha t
a n y invest i ga tion tha t we n eed to d o h a s al ready b e e n d one . Didn't
think it wo uld de v elop i nto any thing f u r ther. I f so , woul d r e vi ew it
wi t h t he Bo ard a t tha t t ime .
(9) CONS E NT CALEN DAR it ems removed fo r discussion .
(h) Roth s tat e d th at we s h o ul d p oss i bly r e ject a ll bids a n d take
the next bid . TLW exp l a ined that th is b id had two prob l ems.
The b id t hat came in from S & J Chevrolet simp l y forgot t o .
b id t h e eq u ipmen t . Wo ul d b e un fai r t o a llow hi m to c omp l e t e
t he bid . Was n o doub t in anyo n e 's mind tha t they simp l y
o v er l ook ed the eq u ipment . The s e cond part of th is r e l ated t o
t he bids tha t came in iden tica l. Sa i d t h ey exa mined t hem
c arefu l ly t o determine if t her e was a n y collusion but the s ta ff
wa s c o n v inced t h a t t h ere wa s no t. Th e spec was writte n f or
a speci f ic t ype vehicle and eq ui pment. Th e equi pme nt man u fac ture r
r e ali zed h e had to acquire a tru ck and got a pr ic e from the
truck d e aler , and the truck d e aler got a price o n the e quipme nt
part from the ma nufa cturer. Ne ither one s a w f it to cut the ir o wn
item . Brought them both in and h a d a me e ting. Told the m fr ankly
. we wer e a little bit nervous and mi g ht have to rej e ct the m.
They we r e v ery c and i d and s a id it was just a f luk e . Th e y a g r e ed
they would not o bj e ct if we cho se International Harveste r as
they a r e from Ora n ge Co u nty and the other o ne is from LA .
Roth the n said h e h a d just wa nte d the sta f f's opinion on this.
It was moved, s e cond ed and carried.
(o), (p)&(q) Ya mamoto aske d if this was the way we usually h a ndled this .
We p ay th e money and then try to g et it back . FAH said y es, a s
this was an emergency situation. We hav e to get it r e paire d
and the contract or working for the telephone company doesn't
have the e x pertise to do the work . Said he thought Pacific
Telephone is a responsible company.
(28) DISTRICT 11 -C.O. TO 11-1 3-2
Pattinson questioned why this wasn 't figured into the original
cont r act . REL advised that when plans were origina ted, Sta te Parks
felt we co u ld go across State parks . Started to initiate this at
city beaches and State Beaches denied access to State beache s .
Have to go al l t h e way down to Couldn 't these costs ahead
of time . Change order is due to changed cond i tions . Was not
caused by contractor . Was on a cost+ basis .
-2-
(31-a) Staff Report re Supplemental EIR for Big Canyon Drainage Area
Ray Lewis indicated that because this was a critical issue, he would
review the alternatives again . Explained that northerly alignment
had been chosen at one time but was opposed so have now chosen
southerly alignment. Briefly_r ~vi ~we_g. the three al !e...f~ativ_§:.§..-and
the proc~d~~es followedl5s'the staff and the Board with regard to
tne Supplemental EIR .. Said Draft EIR was presented to the Board
on-Octobe r 8th and the Board, at that time, f e lt that the gravity
sewer alignme nt was the best alternative . Based on the information
at that time, filed an application for a Coastal Cormnission permit
for that alignment . Copies of EIR were delivered to State Clearing-
house with comment period to close November 7. Ap plication for
Coastal Commission permit filed on October 10th and Notice of Public
Hearing was published October 14th. Public h e aring held on
October 29th and last time to r e ceive cormnents was November 7th .
Referred to Final EIR before Directors and indicated that the written
comments received were in the back of the EIR . Reviewed some of the
comments received . Commented on hearing on Monday at Coastal
Commission. Said Regional Commission voted 7 in favor and 3 absten-
tions. There was some opposition to the permit issuance which
was registered at that time (at Coasta l Conun. hearing) .
Heather then asked if it was appropriate to go through EIR and pick
up some corrections . Need to correct date of December , 1980 .
Coastal Commission staff refers to sewer line on bay side and EIR
points out that it is on the landward side . Should make this
correction in case we get it appealed . There is bay side and water
side and this i s bay side. She also wondered if we had responses
to the Irvine Company letter. Didn't see any . Charles Pilcher of
EDAW indicated they did respond informally to the Irvine Company .
Responded to all testimony and if conunents raised were significant
issues and needed to be addressed. Said staff didn't feel there
was substantive issues t h at needed to be clarified. Irvine Company
conunented favorably . Heather added she felt they should respond
to several of the things in the Irvine Company letter in detail .
EDAW stated that generally , response is to clarify or identify further.
It was mentioned that they didn 't have to respond to conunents at
Coastal Commiss i on hearing as conunent period had expired on Nov. 7th .
Heather then asked if staff saw any probl em re NPDES permit and
the fact that construction can onl y occur from December to April?
REL answered no, didn't see any problem.
Ray added that the Coastal Commission approval incorporated the
conditions set forth by the Department of Fish and Game which were
basically the same conditions set forth three years ago . At that
time had northerly a l ignment and now have southerly alignment .
Feel conditions are reasonable to minimize the impacts.
(31-b) Consultant indicated REL report summarized their information so
would not need to report further .
REL added that the record should indicate that the Directors have
considered advantages and disadvantages of alternatives including
no project . Quickly reviewed each alternative again :
-3 -
New pump station -costs in exc ess of $1 ,0 85 ,000
Advantages -Minimum disturbance to the environment.
Not in traffic.
Disadvan tages -High cost.
Will be buying e n ergy from tha t day forward .
I ncreased maintenance costs.
Gravity t u nnel sewe r
Advantages -Has minimum i mpact on reserve.
Have minimum impact as far as vehicle traff ic ~
with the exception of earth removed & transported out .
Would not consume a ny e nergy and low in mtce.
Dis advan ta ge s -Most expensive $2.6 million
Back Bay sewer
Advantage s -Least expens i ve in i mp l ementation per i od and
does not consume any energy.
Very minimal amount of maintenance cost .
Disadvantages -Maximum impact on environment. Does impac t
ecological r es erve. Are mitigation measures
in permit to minimize this.
No project alternative -status quo
Still continue to pay energy costs.
No d isruption to e nvironment outside of wha t is there now.
Would not off er sewer service to undeveloped properties
within drainage area.
Other alternative methods of disposal would have to be found .
Heather then moved to incorporate this review into the Big Canyon
Drainage Area EIR. Motion seconded and carried.
3\(t.'>--)-P"°i:° ,,...
Wedaa then spoke as a member of the Coastal Commission. Asked if
3\(~)~decision of Regional Commission is appealed to the State Commission,
does the District provide all to Jackie or does someone from
the District go up and fight appeal. He was answered that the
District has Mr. Tebbetts and EDAW to help fight appeal . Wedaa
added that if appeal if filed, felt the Joint Board ought to see
that necessary help is provided to District 5 on this system.
Vardoulis said he thought we should be using the services of the
consultant and , if necessary, Ray Lewis . Wedaa said he just wanted
to be sure they got help.
Heather mentioned that our Regional Commission r epresentative to the
State Commission abstained on the vote. He was unhappy about
?. receiving the environmental document that morning .
-I (P) 7 d, -r --~
(32) Jackie then moved that the southerly route of the Back Bay Trunk
be selected the best alternative project for District 5 . Motion
was seconded .
Tom Woodruff recormnended that certain findings be included in that
motion such as:
(1) That this approval of the Back Bay g ravity sewer line is
as approved and conditioned by the South Coast Regional
Coastal Cormnission on Monday, Novembe r 10th .
-4-
(2) That noting the changes that have been required and
incorporated into the project by Fish and Game and
Coastal Conunission conditions and mitigation measures
described in the Final EIR wh ich avoid and mitigate
effects
(3) Specific economic and other considerations such as
energy costs, capital costs and a greater degree of
reliability for this system make the project alternative
described in the Final EIR such as the pump station
not feasible.
(4) Heather thought a health hazard finding should also be
added. Because of the gravity problem of the sewer lin e
and potential of overflow and the fact that the
has a consistently high chloraform cx:::iurut, health hazard
should be considered.
TLW reiterated that motion approves southerly alignment and authorizes
going forward based on findings. (See attached summary of findings
from TLW)
Motion carried.
-5 -
TOM:
X REF : BOARD EIR GUIDELINS Section 15088
After certifiaation of the EIR as as adequate , and when
after deliberation , if the District (#5 ) concludes t h a t the
Back Bay Gravity a l ternative is the favored al t ernat ive and approves
that alte rn ative as t h e "Project ", th e Board in making its decision
shou ld make th e fo ll owing findings:
1. Approve the Back Bay gravity sewer
line a l ternative (as approved a nd
conditioned bythe Coastal Commission,
South Coast Region on 11 /10/80)
2 . Changes have been required a nd incorporated
into the project--notabl y the Fish & Game
and Coastal Commission condit i o ns, and
mitigation me as u res described i n the Final
EIR --which avoid a nd mitiga te the
significant environmental effects
described in the Final EIR; a nd
3 .Specific econ o mic and other con siderations ,--
e.g . energy costs , capital costs a nd
t h e poss ibl e unre liability of pumping
a l ternatives make the project a l ternative s
described in the Final EIR In feasib l ~.
VJ-iVv 7U:f
<f . pft;J,·J t ~ ~ rcid
~~~~~
~ 4~111~te~~ fi_ aAU\. L-~~ ~0 ~~~
if.TEBBETTS ~n,~. fl!. ~~ T )1/c~t../<-~~v·
-6 -
11-12-80
REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
I HAVE ESTABLISHED A SAFETY GUIDANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE
PURPOSE OF REVIEWING AND MONITORING THE DISTRICTS' PERSONNEL
SAFETY PROGRAM, BECAUSE OF HIS VAST EXPERIENCE AS A PROFESSIONAL
SAFETY ENGINEER) I HAVE APPOINTED DON FOX TO CHAIR THIS COMMITTEE,
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT FROM THIS
SAFETY COMMITTEE ON A SEMI-ANNUAL BASIS BEGINNING JUNEJ 1981,
/'' REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO, 9-D ON REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT FROM
THE SANTA ANA RIVER BY THE COUNTY) TO BE USED AS GENERAL FILL
MATERIAL BY THE DISTRICTS, THIS IS BEING HELD UP PENDING A PERMIT
FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS) WHICH DOES NOT LOOK TOO FAVORABLE
FOR THE COUNTY,
./ A DRAFT FEDERAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON
OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE. WILL RECOMMEND WHAT ROLE OCEANS SHOULD PLAY.
IN WASTE MANAGEMENT. THE DRAFT REPORT SAYS THAT FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE)
"OCEAN DISPOSAL EITHER BY BARGE OR THROUGH A PIPE SHOULD CONTINUE
TO· BE A DISPOSAL OPTION UNDER APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS
AND WITH ADEQUATE MONITORING· SAFEGUARDS IN THOSE AREAS WHERE OUR
PRESENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE INDICATES ONLY MINIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL
HARM FROM SLUDGE DISPOSAL,"
A RESEARCH PROJECT OF THIS NATURE IS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY
~ THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE AT THIS TIME,
'J(_ a.)
\._! TO DATEJ THE DISTRICTS HAVE RECEIVED $543J616.91 FROM REFINERS
'-r'"
UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S DOMESTIC CRUDE OIL ENTITLEMENTS
PROGRAM. THIS PROGRAM IS DUE TO CONTINUE UNTIL OCTOBERJ 1981.
. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .
OUR ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST WERE $31J318.76.
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.,
. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26TH. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND
AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS:
JAMES WARD
~ .. . . . """" ~IL IP ANTHq_~y
61cMRn EnG~
VICKI EVANS
..... -. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .
DISTRICT NO. l.WILL MEET AT 4:30 P.M,J IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING.