Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-10-10. ~ . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,-CALIFORNIA P. a. sax 8127, F"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) October 4, 1979 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1 .. 2, 3, 5, 6., 7 & 11 _WEDNESDAY., OCTOBER-IO~· 1979 -7 :.30 P. rt 10844 ELL Is AVENUE. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA . . TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sa.td tation Districts Nos. 1, 2 / 3, 5, ·6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the a.bove hour and date. Scheduled Upcomi~g Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMIT'"fEE MEETING-· Tuesday, October 9, 1979 at 11:00 a.m .. EXECU'rIVE: COMMI'J.i'l'BE MEETING -Wednesday, October 31, 1979 at 5:30 p.m .. 0 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 ~· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540.2910 (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMIITEE MEETING DATES · JOINT BOARD MEETINGS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS October Oct 10, 1979 Oct 25, 1979 November Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979 December Dec 12, 1979 Non Scheduled January Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980 February Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980 March Mar 12, 1980 Mar 26, 1980 April Apr 9, 1980 Apr 23, 1980 May May 14, 1980 May 28, 1980 ~ June June 11, 1980 June 25, 1980 July July 9, 1980 July 23, 1980 August Aug 13, 1980 Aug 27, 1980 September Sep 10, 1980 Sep 24, 1980 October Oct 8, 1980 Oct 22, 1980 ll BOARD S O F DIRE CT ORS County Sa nitation Districts of Orange County, California ALL DI STRICTS JOI NT BOARD S SUPPLE MENTAL AGE NDA ITE MS OCTOBE R 10, 1979 -7:30 P.M. Post Office Box 8 127 10844 Elli s Avenue Fountain Va ll ey, Ca lif ., 92708 Telephone s: Area Code 714 540-2 910 962 -2 411 AGENDA (16) (a) Consideration of motion app r oving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifi cations for Digestion and Wet Storage Facilities for the So l ids Handling & Dewa t ering Faci l ities at Pl a n t No . 2 , Job No . P2-24-l , n otifyin g contractors of a pre-bid conference and makin g misce l laneous technica l clarifications .. II . ; • BON.RDS OF DIRECTORS ,..,. ~ty Sanitation Districts of Oranse County, California Post Office Sox 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: ·Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA ME·ETING DATE OCTOBER 10, 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL· INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. ·IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING .THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call . (3) ·Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition.of special guests '....,I (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda : (6) EACH DISTRICT (7) Consideration of motions approving minutes Qf the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 September 12, 1979, regular District 2 -September 12, 1979, regular District 3 September 12, 1979, ·regular District S -September 12, 1979, re&?lar District 6 September 12, 1979, ·regular · · District 7 September 12, 1979, regular District 11 -September 12, 1979, regular ., ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: · (al Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS ~ ~ ~ Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a ~esire to vote differently for any District.) See Pages "A" and "B" ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 9/11/79 . $ 89,498.74 1,305,851.25 26,258.38 -0- 448. SO ·266,367.92 12,702.81 : 2,923.02 5,345.93 59,606,89 6.00 $1_,769,016.73 9/25/79. $ 73,189.59 126,386.52 38,513.75 -o- 3, 888. 34 38,186.15 10,401.96 -0- 568. 68 873.86 3,010.32 5.46 $315,024.63 (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR- ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH ··g (on) . All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as noi'requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested· to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the cons~nt calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .. Chairman ~ill determine if any items are to be delet~d from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (~)--(CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 37161 to K. P. Lindstrom & Associates, increasing the total amount from $20,550 to$28,550 for additional services required in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements ($4,000 of which for services, on a 'per diem fee basis, which may be required during the review period) Consideration of moti~n approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, authorizing an addition of $2,174.62 to the contract with Triad Mechanical Systems, Inc. due to differences in existing pipe which made changes in connections necessary. See page "C" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, authorizing an addition of $14,521.00 to the contract with.H. C. Smith Construction Company for miscellaneous modifications and additional work required See page "D" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, authorizing an addition of $2,142.51 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, inc. to improve strength of fuel tank.supports and for revisions to engine cooling water piping. See page "E" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-137, approving plans and specifications for Restroom Facilities for Personnel Office and Operators' Change Room and Shower Facilities, Job No. PW-07·8, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See ·page "F" . . Consideration of Resolution No. 79-138, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Incinerator No. 2 and Ram Tables at Headworks "C", Job No. PW-068R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (engineer's estimate $100,000) See page "G" (g) Consideration of Resolution No .. 79-139, awarding negotiated contract for rehabilitation of 1\~o (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specificati~n No. R-001, to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. in the amount of $56,522.00. See page ''H" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-140, to receive and file bid tabulati~n and recommendation and awarding contract for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount of $187 ,186.00. See pages "l" and "J" ~ .. {CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) .;;.3.~ '. 0 (9) {CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Skid-Mounted, Diesel-Driven Generator Set, Specification No. E-099, to Generator Equipment Company in the amount of $7 ,422 .12 · See page "K" (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages (Breach of Contract, to Enforce Payment of Claim in Stop Notice, Against Payment Bond, and Common Count for Money Had and Received), Case No. 59400, Concrete Tie and Anchor Coporation vs. Hydro-Mechanical Co., dba Geo Structors, et al. in connection with Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, and refer to the General Counsel for defense and appropriate action · (k) (1) Consideration of motion approving continued representation by retired Director Donald Winn in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies through the Association's annual meeting in August, 1980, or until replaced by Board action upon recommendation of the Executive Committee, as recommended by the Executive Committee (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-141, authorizing payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with District representation in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies by retired Director Donald Winn, as recommended by the Executive Committee. See page "L'' U (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, revising the sum payable per day by the contractor if not completed within the prescribed number of days from $200 to $50 and deleting requirement of a bid bond . DISTRICTS 1 & 6 (m) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file repo~t of Districts' General Counsel re sale of Districts' property in the vicinity of Hyland Avenue in Costa Mesa. See page "M" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-150, approving Purchase and Sale Agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, for sale of District property in the vicinity of Hyland Avenue, Costa Mesa, for the amount of $24,500. See page ''N'' (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-151, authorizing execution of G~ant Deed to Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, and accepting Grant of Easement from Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, for under- ground sewer line purposes at no cost to the Districts. See page "0" ~ .. (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) ' .. -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, granting a time extension of 96 calendar days to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. due to authorized delay in starting construction to allow adequate time for drying of the river bed. See page "P" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-152-2, accepting Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Com~letion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page ' Q" · . (p) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-153-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 1.057 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (q) Consideration of Resolution No .. 79-154-2, approving Agreement with the City of Brea providing for payment of user fees for service prior to completion of Annexation No. 38 -Carb.on Canyon Annexation No. 1 to CoWlty Sanitation District No. 2, deferral of acreage fees and establishing conditions of said annexation. See pages "R" & "S" DISTRICT 3 (r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, authorizing an addition of $95,849.62 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work required, and granting a time extension of 95 calendar days for completion of said work, delays caused by relocation of utilities and inclement weather. See page · "T" ---- (s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order.No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $131.00 from the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. See page "U" (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-155-3, accepting Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion therefor and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "V" (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-156-3, approving agreement with the City of Buena Park providing for resurfacing and permanent restriping of Orangethorpe Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Stanton Avenue by District in conjuction with construction of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-22-2, and providing for reimbursement of costs by City. See pages "W" . and "X" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) . ' ....... . . . ~::· . . ··;-5-. ;: .. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 5 (v) Consideration of motion declaring intent to enter into agreement with the City of Newport Beach relative to District construction of City water line in conjunction with construction of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and providing for reimbursement of costs to District by Cit·y. See page "Y" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (w) (x) (y) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, granting a time extension of 25 calendar days to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. due to late start of County EMA contractor re interim Santa Ana River improvements which were closely connected to this project. See page "Z" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No .. 5-21, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $10,836.80 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. See page "AA" · · Consideration of Resolution No. 79-157, accepting Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, as complete, authoriiing execution of a Notice of Completion therefor, and approving Final Closeout Agreement See page "BB" · DISTRICT 7 (z) (aa) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-159-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings for annexation of .72 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake .Drive and Skyline Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 89 -Buchanan. Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-159, authorizing issuance of Encroachment Permit to One Town Center Drive Associates, a Joint Venture, relative to a structure on District College Avenue Sub-Trunk easement, Contract No. 7-lF,in the vicinity of Bristol Street and Sunflower. See page "CC" DISTRICT 11 (bb) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Smith-Emery dated August 3, 1979, for in-plant pipe testing services in connection with construction of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, for an amount not to exceed $25,000. See page "DD" . {CONSENT CALENDAR to be continued on page 7) -6-.. ~ .. . : ... ~ . \ .- (9) . (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) DISTRICT 11 (Continued) (cc) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Conunittee certification re final negotiated fee for Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2. See page "EE" · (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-161-11, approving agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, in form approved by the General Counsel, on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $25,000. See page "FF" (dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-162-11, approving Addendum No. 2 to agreement with Keith and Associates for design of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, providing for construction staking services in connection.with said project and increasing the maximum fee from $121,000 to $198,000. See page "GG" END OF CONSENT-CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ·.:. .. -7- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS ~ .. Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re personnel matters (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote approving amendments to 1979-80 fiscal year budgets to reflect actual tax allocations pursuant to Proposition 13 See page "HH" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-149, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, establishing position of Personnel Analyst. See page "II" (15) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of the following resolutions establishing charges for Class I and Class II permittees pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities of the respective Districts: See page "JJ" Class I Fee Class I I Fee (a) District No. Resolution No. Flow(a) S.S.(b) B.O.D.(c) 1 79-142-1 $175 $21. 85 $11. 90 $250 2 79-143-2 181 22.50 1~.30 258 3 79-144-3 182 23.00 12.35 260 5 79-145-5 211 26.55 14.30 300 6 79-146-6 179 22.15 12.15 255 7 79-147-7 211 26.55 14.30 300 11 79-148-11 204 '25.20 13.80 290 (a) Per million gallons of flow (b) Per thousand pounds of suspended solids (c) Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn .. ~ .. '• . . :. ... .. · . -8- . ' . ~ ,__ . (21) . DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (.29) DISTRICT 7 {a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request of The Baldwin Company dated September 21, 1979, .for deferral of annexation acreage fees for 99.02 acres in the amount of $128,626.98 until June 30, 1980, and for a conditional reimbursement agreement for the island parcels within Annexation No. 82 -Tract No .. 9606 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "KK" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re deferral agreement requested by The Baldwin Company. See page "LL" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-160-7; approving agreement with Baldwin Builders for deferral of annexation acreage fees and conditional reimbursement for island parcels within Annexation No. 82 -Tract No. 9606 to County Sanitation Dist.rict No. 7. See page "MM" (30) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ .. -9-.. II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE OCTOBER 10, 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests ~ (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See Stll'~lemefttal ageftea : (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes Qf the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -September 12, 1979, regular District 2 -September 12, 1979, regular District 3 -September 12, 1979, regular District 5 -September 12, 1979, regular District 6 September 12, 1979, ·regular District 7 -September 12, 1979, regular District 11 -September 12, 1979, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS R:)~L :;,L!.. vorE.-.--Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See Pages "A" and "B" ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. s DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 9/11/79 $ 89,498.74 1,305' 851. 25 26,258.38 -0- 448.50 266,367.92 12,702.81 7,29 2,923.02 5,345.93 59,606.89 6.00 $1:,769,016.73 9/25/79 $ 73,189.59 126,386.52 38,513.75 -0- 3,888.34 38,186.15 10,401. 96 -0- 568.68 873.86 3,010.32 5.46 $315,024.63 (9) ALL DISTRICTS r .: r:?!I Vcti? or C:!~t ur.:1.1:m:JU:i S:il!ot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(A) THROUGH'9(oo) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman ~ill determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) '! '! ~ i . I . I ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 37161 to K. P. Lindstrom & Associates, increasing the total amount from $20,550 to$28,550 for additional services required in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements ($4,000 of which for services, on a per diem fee basis, which may be required during the review period) (b) Consideration of moti9n approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, authorizing an addition of $2,174.62 to the contract with Triad Mechanical Systems, Inc. due to differences in existing pipe which made changes in connections necessary. See page "C" (c) Consideration of motion approving :Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, authorizing an addition of $14,521.00 to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company for miscellaneous modifications and additional work required See page "D" (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, authorizing an addition of $2,142.51 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. to improve strength of fuel tank supports and for revisions to engine cooling water piping. See page "E" (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-137, approving plans and specifica- tions for Restroom Facilities for Personnel Office and Women Operators' Change Room and Shower Facilities, Job No. PW-078, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "F" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-138, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Incinerator No. 2 and Ram Tables at Headworks "C", Job Nos.PW-068R-A and PW-068R-B & authorizing General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (engineer's estimate $100,000) See page "G" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-139, awarding negotiated contract for rehabilitation of Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001, to Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. in the amount of $56,522.00. See pag~ "H" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-140, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount of $187, 186. 00. See pages "I" and "J" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS {Continued) I (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Skid-Mounted, Diesel-Driven Generator Set, Specification No. E-099, to Generator Equipment Company in the amount of $7 ,422 .12 See page "K" (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages (Breach of Contract, to Enforce Payment of Claim in Stop Notice, Against Payment Bond, and Common Count for Money Had and Received), Case No. 59400, Concrete Tie and Anchor Coporation vs. Hydro-Mechanical Co., dba Geo Structors, et al. in connection with Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, and refer to the General Counsel for defense and appropriate action · (k) (1) Consideration of motion approving continued representation by retired Director Donald Winn in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies through the Association's annual meeting in August, 1980, or until replaced by Board action upon recommendation of the Executive Committee, as recommended by the Executive Committee (2) (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-141, authorizing payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with District representation in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies by retired Director Donald Winn, as recommended by the Executive Committee. See page "L" Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, revising the sum payable per day by the contractor if not completed within the prescribed number of days from $200 to $50 and deleting requirement of a bid bond ! .. ·:I DISTRICTS 1 & 6 (m) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file repo~t of Districts' ij General Counsel re sale of Districts' property in the vicinity ! i of Hyland Avenue in Costa Mesa. See page "M" I: f i ! I L (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-150, approving Purchase and Sale Agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, for sale of District property in the vicinity of Hyland Avenue, Costa Mesa, for the amount of $24,500. See page "N" (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-151, authorizing execution of Grant Deed to Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited PartneTship, and accepting Grant of Easement from Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, for under- ground sewer line purposes at no cost to the Districts. See page "0" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, granting a time extension of 96 calendar days to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. due to authorized delay in starting construction to allow adequate time for drying of the river bed. See page "P" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-152-2, accepting Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Co1!Wletion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page ' Q" (p) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-153-2, authorizing ini ti.a ti on of proceedings to annex 1. 05 7 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-154-2, approving Agreement with the City of Brea providing for payment of user fees for service prior to completion of Annexation No. 38 -Carbon Canyon Annexation No. 1 to County Sanitation District No. 2, deferral of acreage fees and establishing conditions of said annexation. See pages "R" & "S" DISTRICT 3 (r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, authorizing an addition of $95,849.62 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work required, and granting a time extension of 95 calendar days for completion of said work, delays caused by relocation of utilities and inclement weather. See page "T" ----- (s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a_ total deduction of $131.00 from the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc . See page "U" (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-155-3, accepting Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion therefor and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "V" (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-156-3, approving agreement with the City of Buena Park providing for resurfacing and permanent restriping of Orangethorpe Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Stanton Avenue by District in conjuction with construction of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-22-2, and providing for reimbursement of costs by City. See pages "W" and "X" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- -. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 5 (v) Consideration of motion declaring intent to enter into agreement with the City of Newport Beach relative to District construction of City water line in conjunction with construction of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and providing for reimbursement of costs to District by City . See page "Y" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (w) (x) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, granting a time extension of 25 calendar days to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. due to late start of County EMA contractor re interim Santa Ana River· improvements which were closely connected to this project. See page "Z" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No •. 5-2°1, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $10,836.80 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. See page "M" (y) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-157, accepting Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion therefor, and approving Final Closeout Agreement See page "BB" DISTRICT 7 (z) (aa) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-159-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings for annexation of .72 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 89 -Buchanan Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-159, authorizing issuance of Encroachment Permit to One Town Center Drive Associates, a Joint Venture, relativ~ to a structure on District College Avenue Sub-Trunk easement, Contract No. 7-lF,in the vicinity of Bristol Street and Sunflower. See page "CC" DISTRICT 11 (bb) Consideration of motion to receive, file arid accept proposal of Smith-Emery dated August 3, 1979, for in-plant pipe testing services in connection with construction of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, for an amount not to exceed $25, 000. See page "DD" (CONSENT CALENDAR to be continued on page 7) -6- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) DISTRICT 11 (Continued) (cc) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee for Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2. See page "EE" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-161-11, approving agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, in form approved by the General Counsel, on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $25,000. See page "FF" (dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-162-11, approving Addendum No. 2 to agreement with Keith and Associates for design of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, providing for construction staking services in connection with said project and increasing the maximum fee from $121,000 to $198,000. See page "GG" END OF CONSENT:CALENDAP. · (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -7- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Repor t of the Executi v e Commi t t ee and considera t i on of mot i on to r ecei ve an d f il e t he Comm ittee 's wri tt en r eport (12) ALL DISTRI CTS Con s idera t ion of mot i on t o c on ven e in ex e cutive sess i on r e p e rsonnel ma tters (13) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CAL L VOTE .... ___ Con s ideration of roll call v ote approv ing am endmen t s to 1979 -80 fiscal year budgets to reflect actua l tax alloca ti on s purs u a nt to Proposition 13 (14) Roll Call Vote or Cas t Unani mou s Ball ot (15) Roll Ca ll Vote or Cas t Un ani mous Ballot (1 6) See p a ge "HH" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-149, amend i ng Po s ition s a nd Sa l a ries Re s olution No. 79-20, establishing po s ition o f Pe rsonn e l Analyst. See "II" p age ____ _ EACH DISTRICT Consideration of the following resolutions e stab lis h i n g ch a r ges for Cl a ss I and Class II permittee s pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Es tablishing Regulations for Use of District Sewe rage Facilities of the r e s p ective Districts: See page "JJ" Class I Fee Cl a ss II Fee (a) Di s trict No. Resolution No. Flow(a) S.S .(b) B.O.D .(c ) 1 79-142-1 $175 $ 21. 85 $11.90 $250 2 79-143-2 181 22.50 12.30 258 3 79-144-3 182 23.00 12 .35 260 5 79-145-5 2ll 26.55 14.30 300 6 79-146-6 179 22.15 1 2 .15 255 7 79-147-7 2ll 26.5 5 14.30 300 ll 79-14 8 -ll 204 25.20 13.80 29 0 (a) Per million gallons of flow (b) Per thousand pounds of suspended solids (c) Per thousand pounds of bioche mical oxygen de ma nd ALL DIS TRIC TS Oth e r bu s iness and communic a tions or supplemental agenda items, if a ny (16) (a) Consideration of motion app roving Addendum No . 1 to the plans and 1nMso N specifi cations for Digestion and Wet Storage Facilities for the SU?P t EME NTAL A G ENDA Solids Ha ndling & De wat e ring Facilities a t Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24 -l, notifying contractor s of a pre-bid conference and \A mak i n g miscellaneous technical clarifications ~ ~ VV.V '"\.11.A ;J. ,,.. ~ ~ c't1 Q_,"' ( -t.nc, 6-<tv'-'-~c. "\iv..cc.t'-l (17) DISTRICT 1 /) '- Oth er business and communi c ations or supplement a l agenda item s, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Considera tion of motion t o a d journ g·.? I (19) DISTRICT 2 Oth e r business and comm un i c ations or s upp l em e nta l a gen da i t ems, if an y (20) DISTRICT 2 Con s ideration of motion t o a d j ourn i'.'~ / -8 - (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 , Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ·,f) (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adj oum ~ ',) 1 (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ',) l (27) DISTRICT 11 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 11 • I}_ I ~,7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 7 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request of The Baldwin Company dated September 21, 1979, for deferral of annexation acreage fees for 99.02 acres in the amount of $128,626.98 until June 30, 1980, and for a conditional reimbursement agreement for the island parcels within Annexation No. 82 -Tract No. 9606 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "KK" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re deferral agreement requested by The Baldwin Company. See page "LL" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-160-7, approving agreement with Baldwin Builders for deferral of annexation acreage fees and conditional Roll Ca!r Vote or Cast reimbursement for island parcels within Annexation No. 82 -Tract Unanimous Ballot • • • • No. 9606 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "MM" (30) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 7 .f Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·,~r -9- ( JI MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JQ;NT BOARDS Regular Meeting Octob er 10, 1 979 -7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 El lis Avenue Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Arco Code 714 540-29 10 9 62-241 1 Th e following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appe ar on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwi s e se l f -explanatory . Warrant lists a re enclosed with the agenda material s ummarizing t h e bills p aid since th e l as t. Joint Board meeting . To minimiz e the amount of redundancy a nd duplication in th e agenda mater i al and reduce the number of comm e nts in the Manager 's Report, we have expanded the d escription of th e agenda items in the a genda itself , particularl y with regard to chan g e orders and c o ntr ac ts whi c h have b een publicly bi d and are wi thin the contra ct budget or e n gin eer 's estimate . Detaile d change ord ers ar e i n c l uded in th e s uppor ting material as well as the bi d tabulations for th e c on trac ts being r econunended for award . Joint Boards No. 9-a -Authori z ing Change Ord er to K. P. Lind s trom & Associ a t es for Additional Wor k o n Waiver Application . At the J uly, 1 978 Board meeting , K. P. Lind s trom & Associates was a uthorized to ass i st the staff in t h e prepa ration of the Fede ra l 3 0l(h) app lication fo r modif ication of secondary treatme nt require - ments. Because of EPA's long delay s in publi s hin g the regulati o ns and becaus e the regu l ations were significa ntly c h anged , a n amendmen t was auth orized on July 11, 197 9, incre asing the allocation from $8,000 to $20 ,5 50 . To complete th e ap plication by September 13 t h, the dead lin e , K . P. Lind strom was again r e quested to p erform additional work beyond the scope of the contract. It ha s b een mu tua lly agreed be - tween the staff and K. P. Lindstrom & Associates th at this addi t ional work was done fo r a lump sum amount of $4,000. I n a ddition , the staff an ti c ip ate s that additional efforts of $4,000 d urin g the revi ew period by EPA may be required of K. P. Lindstrom & Associates. Th e staff recomme nds that t h e existing c ont r ac t b e incre ase d from $20,550 to $28,550. No . 9-b -Chan ge Ord e r No. 1 to Un der Drain S y stem f o r Di gester Cleaning Beds at Re cl ama tion Plant No . 1 , Job No. P l-17. Th e contra ct plans showed tha t th e contractor was to tie in t o a n existing underground 6-inch ductile iron pipe at four places . When the pipe was exposed , it was fo und to be 8 -inch transite instead. This change order adds $2 ,17~.62 to the contr act price to cover the cost to the contractor for providing special con - n ections to the tr ansi te pipe. There is no extens i on of contract time for this chan ge order . The staff recommends app r oval of this addition to the contract. No. 9-c -Change Order No . 6, Job No . P2-23-6 . Thi s change order i n the total amount of $14 ,521 i s for miscel - l aneous items pertaining to mechanical adjustments in slud ge pumps, additional waterproofing and corrosion protection, re l ocation of dewatering system for the widenin g and lining of the Santa Ana River Ch annel by Et~, revision of e l ectrical conduit size, and the relo cation of electrical conduit to a llow installation of new cable tray. This chanse order ($14,521) adjusts the contract p rice of this $30.67 million contract approximately $117,000, exclusive of the $295 ,000 change order approved by District No . 11 for the initial portion of the Coa st Trunk Sewer. No. 9 -d -Ch ange Order No. 1 to I!1stallation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at RQthrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No . J -3 -1 . Thi s change order adds $2,142 .51 to the contract price for extra structure to the fuel tank supports for full earthquake pro- tection and to cover the costs to the contractor for revisions to the engine coo ling water piping. No extension of time for this change order. The staff recommends approval for an addition to the contract price . No. 9-e -App roving Plans and Sp_ecificatio!"!s for Restroom Facilities and Operator Change Room and Shower Facilit i es , Job N o.---J?W·=-rr1 a . The staff h as completed plans and specific~tions to provide restroom facilities for the newly -impr ove d personnel office as we ll a s an adjacent operator change room and shower facility . It i s the staff 's recommendation that the restroom facilities for the personnel office , as we ll as the facilities for the operators, be include d in the same contract because of the close proximity a nd similarity of the proposed work . The eng ineer 's est imate for this work is $Li5 ,000. -2- ' No . 9 -g -Awa rdin g Contra ct for Sp ec ifica tion No . R-0 0 1 . At the l as t Bo a rd meet in g , the s taff recomme n de d the r e j ect i o n of the one bid received for pa rt s and l abor requi red t o r ebui l d t wo di ges t er gas engines bein g r e l ocated fr om Plant No . 2 t o Pl ant No. 1 . Th e one b i d rece i ved was in t h e amoun t of $61,000 . The staff has n egot i ated with Waukesha Eng i ne Servicenter, the sole supp l ier of the par ts f o r these engines a n d h ave mutua l ly agreed uuon a contr act ur i ce of $56 .522. Th e negotiated agreement inc l ude s firm prices on s h aft rocker arm, cy l inder head nuts and s t uds and intake manifold st uds. Th e cost o f additiona l parts items cannot be ascerta i ned un t il the engines are complete l y disassembled for inspection. Th e staff recommends awarding t h e contr act to Waukes h a in the amo un t of $56,522. No . 9 -h -Awar d of Contrac t No. PW -069 -1 -Wet Weather Contin- gency P l an at Coyote Ca nyon Sludge Processing Site . Bi ds were received on October 2nd for the construct i on of an a ll weather holding basin for sludge to be processed at the Coyote Canyon Slu dge P r ocessing Site. These facilities are requir e d to imp lement the wet weather contingency plan as required by the Regional Water Quality Contro l Board to insure year-round disposal of sewage solids. Three bids were received with one cont r actor s ubmitting a "no b i d" quotation . The two responsive bids were $1 87 ,1 86 and $214,362. I t is the staff 's recorrn nendation that the award be made, based upon the unit prices submitted in the proposals , to Sully -Miller Contracting Company of Orange in the amount of $1 87,1 86 . (Engineer 's estimate , $2 0 0,000 ). No. 9 -i -Award of Specification No. E -099 . At the Apr i l Board meeting , the Genera l Manager wa s authorized to solicit proposals and issue a purchase order for portable buildings .• fenc i ng, and fue l and water tanks required for the operation and maintenance yard at the Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site . The s t aff h as prepared the specification s for one skid -mounted diesel g e nera t or set necessary for auxiliary powe r at the Sludge Processing S i te. Five bids were submitted on September 25th which rang ed from a h igh o f $9 ,036.50 to a low o f $7,422 .1 2 . The staff recommends awar d t o Generator Equ i pment Company i n t h e amount of $7 ,422 .1 2 . No . 9 -1 -Ad dendum NO. 1 to Con t r a ct No . J -13 -2R. Upon a u thor i zation from t h e Board, the staff was directed to s oli c it an d n egotia t e a contract for t h e wa r ehouse office expansion af t er publ i c bidding failed to attract any bidders. Four propos a l s we r e received ranging from a l ow of $199,000 to a hi g h of $259 ,142 . The award for this j ob was made t o Coy Atkins at the September Boar d mee ting i n t he amount of $1 99,000. -3 - During the solicitation and n egotiation for proposa l s, an addendum was is s u ed changin g the liquidated d amages from $200 p er day to $50 p er day. I t was the s taf f 's op inion, based on the comments f rom pro spec t ive firms, that without thi s change it wou ld b e difficult to obtain b ids. The staff r ecommends approva l of this adde ndum modifyin g the liquida t e d d amage clause from $200 per day to $50 p e r day . Distri cts Nos . 1 and 6 No. 9-m -Proposed Sale of Di s t rict _ _RE£1?erty in the Vi cinity of Ha r bor and Warner . At the June meet in g , the District No. 1 and 6 Boards a uthori zed the General Coun se l to enter into negotia tions with the owners of adjacent properties to a 20-foo t fee parce l which diagonally b isects a n umber of l arge parcels from Harbor Boulevard easterly to th e San t a Ana River in the City of Costa Mesa . The Directors authorized the n egotiations on the basis that the adjacent property owners pay the fair market value established by the Districts ' appraiser and insure t he District s would receive sewe r easements for the e xisting pipe- l ines. The Districts ' General Counsel h as negotiated wi th Harbo r Boulevard Investmen t i n th e c:ppra is ed amount of $24 ,500. The nec essary reso lu tions are included in the agenda ma teri a l for con - sideration. District No. 2 No. 9-n -Ch ange Order No . 1 t o Olive Sub-Trunk Repair , Con tract No. 2 -5R-l. Thi s change order is for an extension of time only , and involv es n o a ddit ion or deduction to the contract. The contractor requested a de l ay in s t arting construction to alJ.oH adequate time for the drying of the river bed. This delay did not cause p robl ems for the Distric t. The total requested extension of time i s for 96 calendar d ays . Th e sta ff r ecommends approva l of this change o rder for time extension only. No. 9-o -Accept ing Contr ac t No. 2-5R-l as Comp l ete . John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., contractor for th e Olive Sub- T runk Repair, Contract No. 2 -5R -l, h as comp l e t ed a ll specifie d work and h as executed the Final Cl oseout Agre e ment . The staff recommends accept ance of this contract and the authori zation fo r f i ling the Notice o f Compl e tion. (Final Contract Price: $189,970). -4- No. 9-p -Initiation of Proceedings -Ann exation No . 39. Mr. a nd Mrs. Oz aki and Mr. and Mrs . Li ght , owners of two private residences in the City of Anaheim near the Timken Road a nd Coyote Lane intersection, have requested anne xation of approxi- mately 1.057 acres to t he District . The staff recommends initi ation of pro ceedings for this annexation. No. 9 -q -Proposed Annexa tion Agreement with the City of Brea -Annexation No . 38 . In cluded in the agenda material is a memo from the General Couns e l outlining the details of the agreement to be entered into between the City of Brea and the Di stric t for the annexation of approximately 1 90 acres in the Carbon Canyon area . The District's staff and the City 's staff are completing the certification as to the actual acreage and existing connections to the City sewers . It appears at thi s time that the annexation fees should be based on 18 8 .87 acres for a total fee of $284,240. There are various reside nti a l a nd commercial connections in the area wh ich have been comput ed at the $220 connection rat e established by the District at a total fee of $61,699 . Di strict No. 3 No. 9-r -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No . 3-20-4 . Thi s change ord e r in the amount of $95,849 .62 includes an item of approximately $52 ,600 for installation of v a riable thickness asphalt overlay on Knott Avenue betwe e n Orangcthorp e Avenue and the Fullerton Creek Channel. This work was done ih _gccordance with the excavation permit issued by the City of Buena Park and mutually agreed upon by the Directors at the time the contrac.t was awarded in December , 1978 . This chan g e order also includ e s a sand slurry seal coat over the existing roadbed from the Fullerlon Creek Channel to Artesia Boulevard in the amount of $22 ,0 00 for which the City of Buena Park has agreed to p a y half the cost . Additional items in this change order are the installation of protective coating on ten manhol es installed on the contract, as well as the installation of one fiberglass manhole installed in lieu of the lined concrete manho le in order that the Districts may evaluate this type of manhole for future proj ects . Miscellaneous items in this change order are for conduit interferences, remodeling connections to existing manholes, concrete encasement and traffic control delineators, signs and striping as required by Cal Trans at the Santa Ana Freeway inter - section. Th e staff recommends approval o f t hi s change order wh ich inc l udes a tot al extension of time of 95 calendar days . Delays encountered were for extra work included in the change order, delays by the San Diego Pipeline Company for gas transmission main relocation, delays in the relocation of e l ectr ical ducts serving the Kraft Company and fo ur days of inclement weather and two days for un- h ea l thy air quality stage two a l erts . -5 - 0 No. 9-s -Ch a n g e Order No. 2 to Knott Inte rcepto r , Re a ch 8, Contra c t No. 3 -20 -4 . Thi s cha n ge or d e r d edu c t s $131 f r om th e con t ra ct p ri ce f o r a n adju stment in Enp,inee r 1 s quantit i es. Th e s taff r ecommends approva l of thi s deduct i on from the contrac t pr i ce . No . 9 -t -Acceptin~~trac t No. 3 -20-4 as Comp l ete . John A . Artukovich Sons, Inc ., contractor for this portion o f the Knott Interceptor, bas completed all spe cified work and has executed the Final Closeout Agreement . The staff recommends ac cep t - ance of this contra ct and authorization for filing th e Notice of Completion at a final contra ct amount of $1 ,568,168 .62 . (Original c on tract, $1 ,4 7 2 ,450). No . 9-u -~oving Agreement ·with City of Buena Park re Orangethorpe Reli ef Tru1tlc Sewe!. Th e City of Buena Parle has awarded a stree t widening and re- surfacing project. partially funded through the AHFP funding pro gram . A portion of this resurfacing a nd ·widening project by the City will affect the installation of the Oran~cthorpe Relief Trunk Sewer be - twe en Beach Boulevard and Stanton Avenue . In order to better coordi- nate the joint efforts of the District and the City, the respective staffs are reconm1 e nding a cooperative effort whereby the City \ .. wuld complete the widening of the street under th e AHFP project prior to the installation of the Di str ict 's Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer b ut not install the final paving . After the sewer has been completed in this re a ch , the District will, under our sewer contract , resurfa ce the street . The City will pay to the District th e ir contract amoun t for this resurfacing . This cooperative effort was presented by the City staff to the City Council and they have agreed to it in concept . I t i s the staff's recommendation that the agreement be approved . Di strict No . 5 Cooperative f\grce~~nt -~i:th City of 'N e wport Beach in Connection wi t h Bayside Drive Trunk Scw2r . I n discussing the p l ans for the rep l acement of the portion of t h e Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer , Ci t y staff i s requesting that the Di strict consider a j oint proje c t wherein certain City water ma i ns woul d be replaced at the same time as the sewer construction . The Ci ty i s proposing that the District would b e the contracting agency a n d t h e City would pay a l l the costs of t h e water main and the i r propor tionate share of admin i strative and engineering costs. The staff is recommending that the Boar d dec l are its i n t ent t o en t er into an agreement with the City of Ne ·wport Beach for th i s co ope r ative p roj ect . -6 - -Di s~ricts Nos. 5 and 6 No. 9-w -Change Order No. 2 to Santa Ana River Siphon, Contrac t No. 5-21. This change order is for an extension of time only, and in- volves no addition or d eduction to the contra ct. Th e work required under this contract was clo se ly tied to the construction of this in terim S a nta Ana River improvement by the Coun t y EMA . The total s r equested exten sion of time i s fo r 25 calendar days due to delays c aused by the l ate start of the EMA contractor. Th e staff recom- mends approval of this chan ge orde r for time extens i on only . No. 9-x -Ch ange Order No . 3 t o Santa Ana River Siphon , Con tract No . 5-21 . This change order adds $1 0,836.80 to the c ont ract price for an adj u stment in Eng i neer 's quant i ties . Th e staff r ecommends approval of th is addition to the contract price. No. 9-y -Acc eptance of Con tract No. 5-2 1 as Comp l ete . Albert W. Davies, Inc ., contrac to r for the Santa Ana Ri ver Siphon, Contract No . 5-21, has compl eted all spec ifi ed work and h as execut e d the Final Clos eo ut Agreement. The staff recommends acc eptance of thi s contract and the authori zation for f i ling the Notice of Completion. (O rigina l contra ct price: $3 5 7 , 000 - Adjusted Final Contract Pr ice : $373,940.1 1). Distri c t No . 7 No . 9-z -In itia ti on o f Proceedings fo::-Annexation No . 89 . Bucl1 anan Deve lopment h as request e d a nnexation of a singl e-fami l y resi dence in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline Drive in th e uninco rporated te r ritory of the District . The staff recommends approval of the standard reso l ution initiating pro c eedings for this annexa tion . No . 9 -aa -Au t hori z ing Encroachme nt P ermit, Contract No. 7 -lF . During th e construction of the Towne Ce n ter Deve l opment , the develop e r has constructed a cha uffer carport within the Distric t 's sewer e aseme nt. Thi s c arport does not in terfere with t h e present operation of the sewer facility. Th e staff i s recommending the issua nce of an e ncro a chm e nt permi t pr e pared by t h e Ge n eral Couns e l to a llow the carport to remain as l ong as i t does not interfere with t h e District 's operation, ma i ntenance or reconstruction of any sewer fa cilities wit hin the sewer easeme nt . -7- District No. 11 No . 9-bb -In-Plant Pipe Inspection for Coast Trunk Sewer, Job No. 11-13-2. In connection with the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer, in-plant inspection is required durin g the manufacture of th e pipe to be supplied for this proiect. The staff has solicited pro - posals from known testing firms who perform this s ervice. It is our recommendation that the proposal submitted by Smith-Emery Comp a n y be approv ed at their prev ailing rates in an a mount n o t to e xceed $25,000. This inspection service cost is grant fundable. No . 9-cc -Resolution A Engineering, Inc ., re Tunne 11-13-2 . As a part of the construction management prog ram submitted to the State for the construction of the Coast Tr unk Sewer, the staff recommended outside assistance for the install a tion o f t h e fi v e tunnels on this project. Pursuant to the Board's authorization at the August meeting , the Selection Committee h a s met and is recom- mending a contract with Butier Engineering, Inc., at established per .diem rates in an amount not to exceed $25,000. This construction inspection consultation is a grant eligible item. No. 9-dd -Approving Addendum No . 2 to Agreement with Keith & Associates to provide the construction survey s taking serv ice s necessary for the installation of the Coast Trunk Sewer . Ba sed upon past construction and the requirements of the pro j ect, the staff is reconrrnending an amount not to exceed $77,000, at the· engineer's per diem rates. Joint Boards No. 11 -Report of the Executive Cbnrrnittee. The Committee met on September 26th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. ·No. 13 -1979-80 Budget Amendments. The Districts have been advised of the actual tax allocations. The County Auditor-Controller's office has requested that t he Boards amend the approved 1979-80 fiscal year budgets to reflect t h ese actual allocations. A sununary schedule is included in the agenda material. -8- : . . 8 No. 14 -Position of Personnel Analyst. At the time the Executive Connnittee and the Joint Boards established the position of Personnel Administrator last spring, the staff recorrnnended that additional staffing of the personnel division be delayed until the Personnel Administrator was hired and the new Administrator could evaluate the staffing needs. At present, the personnel division includes the Personnel Administrator ($2099/2614), a Personnel Assistant ($1059/1317) who handles the payroll and a Senior Records Clerk ($879/1095). The Personnel Administrator has requested that the clerk be promoted to an existing position of Personnel Aide ($1002/1240) and a new position be established of Personnel Analyst ($1491/1855). This position would assist the Administrator with classification studies, salary surveys, be responsible for the recruitment function, and also serve as second-in-connnand in the Administrator's absence. The staff reconnnends establishing the position of Personnel Analyst. No. 15 -Establishing 1979-80 Use Charge Fees for Class 1 and Class 11 Industrial Waste Dischargers. The Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, which was implemented July 1, 1976, provides that the r espective Boards establish unit charges for industrial dischargers for the conveyance, treatment and disposal of sewage through the Districts' facilities based upon the annual budget. Class 1 industrial dischargers .are the major industries in the County which will discharge volumes in excess of 50,000 gallons per day or discharge wastewaters which have a strength 50 percent greater than domestic sewage or are discharging constituents that are con- sidered incompatible with the Districts' sewerage system . The Class 11 permittees are those industries which discharge an excessive volmne or strength of sewage disproportionate to the fees and taxes collected . Both Class 1 and Class 11 permittees are credited the amount of estimated ad valorem taxes paid the District, exclusive of that por- tion of the tax paid for debt service. The establishment of these use charge fees are pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 302 .6 and 303.1 of the Districts' ordinance. These use charges may be amend ed during the first part of 1980 after resolution of our revenue program to comply with Federal requirements. ··. -9- Fred A. Harp er General Manager 0 .RESOLUTIONS· ·AND· ·SUP PO RT ING· ·DOCUMENTS U· ::: > I ~FUND NO ..... ( ~199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 9/07/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBE~ AP43 1 ( '·I •I . • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA~GE COUNTY 'IARRANT NO. ::i:::- F t::i -en -I ;::o ·-\) -I ,,., 067083 047084 047C85 047086 047C87 0470.RS 047Cn9 C67090 0470ql 047C92 C't7tl93 0470'H C47095 047(1% 0'17£197 ~4701)8 (\47099 ('l! 7100 047101 047102 01;7103 047104 047105 047106 O't7107 047108 047109 047110 047111 0 047112 047113 0471H 047115 r.47116 047117 (147118 C47119 047120 Ott7121 047122 047123 ,04712'4 3lf7125 047126 047127 047128 VENDOR ACTION INSTRUMETS co., INC. AIR CALIFORNIA ALEY.ANDER PO~ER TOOLS ALLIED SUPPLY co. AMERICA~ CYA~JMID COMPANY ~MERlCAN UfLOING SOCIETY T~E ANCHOR PACKING CO. ARTESIA IMPLEMENTS & PARTS CO. JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH ASSOCIAT[O OF LOS ~NGfLES AUTO S~OP [CUl~MENT CO. BANNING OATTfRi CO. PELb PIPE & WPPLY CO. JAMES UENZIE OIERLY ~ ASSOCIATES, INC• HOCK & ASSOCIATES BOHAR ~AGNETO SE~VIC(, INC. DOYLE [NGI~EERING CORP BRISTOL PARK ~tOtCAL GRP., INC R. Pe CU~KE CORPORATION EiUTl[R. ENGINEE?.ING, me. CALIFORNIA CONTROLS CO. CARMAN TOOL & ABRA~IVES J0t:1'J CAROLLO ENG lN[fRS CHARLES w. CARTEk CO. CASTLE METAL O~IAN CHUCHUAS JEEP •• INC. R.9. CLAPP CO., INC. COLICH & SONS, A JOINT VENTURE COLLEGE LU~~ER co., INC. COMPRESSOR S[RVICE CO. CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO CONTROL SPECIALISTS, INC. CO~VERSE-wARO-D~VIS-OIXON CORE-kOSION PP.OOUCTS OM"HLS TIJ\l Sf"r.VICE llLBERT w. 01,vrrs, ir;c. C.R. DAVIS SUPFLY CO. OE GUELLt & SONS GLASS CO. OEP.BY'S TOPSOIL OU~N EDWAROS CORP. [ASrnA"11t INC. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES DIST. ENCHANT£Rt H..C. .. ESCONDIDO ~ACHINERY CO. Fill[~ SUPFLY co. CLAIMS PAID 09111/79 AMOUNT $160 .52 $212.00 S99.00 $1,452.H ss,553.19 S8elf8 $208.41 $1+1.59 t.125,421.58 $1.045.33. $445.20 $40lt.82 u,221.12 S84.96 $900.00 $85.86 $82.36 Ht550.35 $39.00 $66t260.63 S15t996.00 $118.40 S329.19 $180t379.96 S3t0!J2.01 $261.82 $5,018·61 $33.Slf $127t983.60 Slf07.71 s23,357.91 SCJ,241.08 n. 57 SJ,516.32 $433.~0 S356.lf8 S59t59R.OO $134.02 $25.27 sso.oo !.585.76 $lf49.90 U8lf.45 s3,ooo.oo 1131.75 $621.27 DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS VALVES CHEMICALS PUBLICATION PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS CONTRACT 3-20-4 ELECTRICAL SUPPLI~S TRUCK PARTS TRUCK BATTERIES PIPE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE SE'LF-INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR PAINT SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS SURVEY 3-13-1, SURVEY 3-20-4, RETENTION 3-13-1 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS CONTRACT PW-074, CONTRACT PW-072, CONTRACT PW-066~1 CONTRACT MGR. P2-23 CONTROLS SMALL TOOLS WAIVER APPLICATION, ENGR. P2-2S. ENGR. P2-24 BEARING SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK -1979 JEEP CJ-7 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES RETENTION 3-13-1 LUMBER RETENTION E-092, COMPRESSOR PARTS CHLORINE CONTROLS SOIL INVESTIGATION "STORAGE TANK TRUCK TIRES CONTRACT 5-21 HOSES GLASS SUPPLY GRAVEL PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLI.ES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING TRUCK PARTS ENGINE PARTS ::: =r FUND NO N ::: WARRANT NO. Olf7129 047130 04 7131 047132 (1"7133 fr't7134 047135 04 71.3& :s> 0'+7137 Gi 047138 fTI O't 7139 2 t:::1 0'47140 ~ 0-47l'tl ~· 047142 -r.: 0471'13 fTI 047144 -:.-=: C.47145 -::tt: 047146 co 0471'17 I 04714!\ .. 047149 :::t::-047150 I 047151 .--047152 t::j 047153 ,...... C47154 ~·(/) 047155 -I 047156 :;o t--t 0'17157 r> 047158 -I C47159 (/) 04716(1 047161 047162 0~71C.3 04 7164 047165 047166 C'47167 047168 (147169 Olf7170 Ott 7171 O'f7172 0'47173 .... Olf 7174 .... :c> I N ::: 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/07/79 PAGE REPORT NUMSER ~P43 COUNTY SANITATIGN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR FISCHER & PORTfR FISHER SCIENTIFIC co. FLO-SYSTEMS FLUO~ ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FUSES UNLIMITED GENERAL ELECT~lC SUPPLY ·GENERAL TfLCPHONE CO. GOLDENWEST FERTILIZER CO. M.[. GRAY CO. DON GFEEK & ASSOCIATES CHARLES G. Ht.Rr;y, INC. HAUL-AWAY CONTAINERS HEwLETT PACKARD HOLLY~OOO TIRE OF ORANGE HOOKER CHEMICALS & PLASTICS CO HOUSE CF eATTERIES HO~ARO SU~PLY CO. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTTNGTO~ SUPPLY INDIAN SPRINGS MFG. to., INC. IRVINE RANCH W~TER DISTRICT KAHAN REAHINCS & SUPPLY KI~G BEARIHG, INC. KLEE t\-Ll NE CORP KOSLO~ SCIENTIFIC CO. L•O•IJ.s., INC. LFE ENVIRON~E~TAL LABS ~.R. LADE'llG CO. LANDS ~f.LDING LARHY'S HLDG. MATtRIALS, INC. LIGHTI~G OISTRIOUTORS, INC. K.P. LINDSTROM & ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES CHfMICAL CO. LOS ANGELES TIMES HA TT -CU LOR t INC• MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. MESA CON~OLIDATEO ~ATER MIC~AY TOOL t $UPPLY co. MILLERS PRINTERY MOTOROLAt IMC. NATIONAL LUHOER SUPPLY NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NO~OCO PRODUCTS NOTTINCHAM FACIFIC CO. OFFICE PROOUCTS CO., INC. CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79 .. • AMOUNT H53.02 $501.32 $16t959.92 S6t525e54 $991.65 SHl.13 $63.60 $173.08 Sl8t898.75 Slf64.79 $448.50 !126. 36 sao.oo $200.00 s1,1s2.oo s2,101.91 $82.81 $216.29 Ut924.75 S.309.57 $205.95 S.3.20 $161.84 $868·1'+ $165.98 . $60. 25 $264.09 $20.00 Sl7A .25 SlOl.6'+ $58.30 $201.76 S6t01't.2.8 $2,761.83 $118.53 $205.08 S2'tO •• lf7 · $6.00 1237.12 $15.90 $61.38 $402.lf! s200.oo $69.97 $66.25 $169.H DESCRIPTION PIPE SUPPLIES· LAB SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS ENGR. 1 MGD JPL-ACTS WATER USEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SLUDGE HAULING VALVE PLUGS CONSTRUCTION 2-SR-l CHEMICALS .TRASH DISPOSAL .LAB SEMINAR TRUCK TIRES CHEMICALS TRUCK BATTERIES PLUMBING PARTS WATER USEAGE ENGINE PARTS GASKET SETS WATER USEAGE BEARING SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK SMALL HARDWARE LAB ANALYSIS GAUGES WELDING SUPPLIES CONCRETE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WAIVER APPLICATION CHLORINE . SUBSCR.I PT IONS · ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE ROUTER KIT TYPE SETTING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SMALL HARDWARE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT RENTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ( ( 2 • • ( '::: :z:;. ( ~ I \.1'I :: FUND NO ~ I r- t=' ,__. (/) -I :::::1 ,__. .. n .. ~ (./) \lARRANT NO. 047175 Olf7176 047177 047178 047179 047180 0471Rl Cl.f71R2 047183 047184' 047185 0471A6 C47187 0471A8 047189 047190 OH191 047192 c 4 71 c:>3 047194 047195 047196 047197 047198 047199 047200 Olf7201. 047202 Clf7203 04720lf Olf7205 047206 047207 047208 047209 0'+7210 047211 047212 0"7213 0472l'f . 0'17215 OH216 0 '+ 721 7 047218 047219 047220 ( ( 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/07i79 PAGE REPORT NU~OER AP43 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79 VENDOR ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. COUNTY OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PACIFIC TELEPHONE PARAMOUNT EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND SALES, INC. PASCAL & LUDWIG .. me. M.C. PATTEN CORP. PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER PETTHIONE CORP. TO~ FO~TONt INC. !>OSTl-IASHR HAROLD PRI~ROSE ICE P.ROTECTO -FLASHt INC. RICARD'S HYDRAULICS RICHEY ELECTRONICS, INC. R osr ~Ot;fH' INC. ShLES ENGINEERS LIMITED SAND COLLAR OUSINfSS FORMS SANDE ECUIPMENT CO. SANTA ANA DODGE SHAMROCK SUPPLY SHEOD ~RO~N, l~C. SLtDOEN ENGINEERING H.C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO. SOUTH ORANGE SVPFLY so. CALIF. COASTAL WAT(R RESEARCH PROJECT SOUTHER~ CALIF. EOISON ~O. SO. CALIF. PNEUMATICS STAR Ow STEEL .. SUPERINTE~OENT OF DOCUMENTS THE SUPPLIERS SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. TFI BUILDING MATERIALS .TAM'S STATIONERS TARDIFF SHEET METAL TAYLOR-OU~:N THOMPSON LACGUER CO. THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES TRANS-\,.'f ST FORD TRl~O ~ECHANJCALt INC. TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC. UNITED PA~CEL Sf.P.VlCE UNITED STATES EOUIPMENT CO., I V'JR SCIENTIFIC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VALVE & PRIMER CORP. . . . AMOUNT $157.4-6 S168.40 S4t044•10 S46e9l Slt'+l6e96 $20,269.98 15'J8.87 $153.96 u,145.94 Sl86.tt6 s1,ooo.oo S36.00 S2t303.lf6 HSS.80 $89.71 $lf62.66 $156.64 s1aq.97 $138.19 $23.85 tS.09 $~76.CJ7 $85.00 $802t618.20 $ 77.94 .s1,soo.oo S37.500.91 $19.24 S94.59 s21.oo S2A7.00 $104.10 $116. 71 $19.61 S5S7e50 $458.13 192.60 $9:?0.45 S35t616.00 $131t377.B2 UG0.93 $49.76 $239.&9 $630.09 $506.(,0 SltOJ0.32 DESCRIPTION CHEMICALS LAB ANALYSIS 3-13-1 BASIN EQUITY ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE TRUCK PARTS CONTRACT J-3-1 PRESSURE GAUGES MOWER BLADES EQUIPMENT REPAIR ENG !NE PARTS POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES VALVES OFFICE FORMS ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS TESTING 3-20-4 CONTRACT P2-23-6 PLUMBING PARTS WAIVER APPLICATION POWER REGULATOR . STEEL STOCK SUBSCRIPT ION SMALL TOOLS SMALL TOOLS PLUMBING PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ROOFING J-6-lG ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES TEMPORARY ACCOUNTING HELP DUMP TRUCKS CONTRACT Pl-17, CONTRACT PW-061 TRUCK PARTS DELIVERY SERVICE COMPRESSOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PLUMBING PARTS VALVES ..• • :::: :t:=a _b. I FUND NO . ::: :t> r r-. t:::J ....... en ~ ;:o ....... ('""') . ·--; en ::: > I J::: ::: .:... \,/ARRANT NO. OH221 047222 047223 04722'+ 0'+7225 047226 ( 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 04Tt 9/07/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBE~ AP~3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79 VENOOP. DANIEL K. WALKER JOHN R. WAPLES WESTERN WHOLESALE CO. WESTINGHOUSE SUPPLY CO. XEP.OX CORP. EVERETT H. YORK CO. · TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79 SUMMARY .#2 F/R FUND 113 OPER FUND 1#3 ACO FUND 113 F/R FUND 115 OPER FUND #5 F/R FUND #5&6 OPER FUND lt5&6 ACO FUND #6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND #7 ACO FUND 1111 OPER FUND JT. OPER FUND CORF WORKING CAP. FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID SEPTEMBER 11,· 1~79 AMOUNT Utt47.19 s211.20 $207.53 $512.19 Sl,943.88 S46el0 Slt769t016.73 ~---------------­----------------- AMOUNT $ 448.SO 8,146.91 131,936.35 126,284.66 9,186.49 3,516.32 8.89 59,598.00 7.29 6.00 1,870.83 1,os2.19: 5,345.93 89,498.74 1,305,851.25 26,258.38 $1,769,016.73 ( DESCRIPTION ANNEX 87 REFUND ODOR CONSULTING TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES XEROX REPRODUCTION ENGINE PARTS ( ·::: t:O FUND NO( . I ~ .. ~ !J~RRANT NO. :J> ~ rT1 ;;;;: t::1 :r> ...._ . --1 ~ :.;:::: co I :I:> I I t::1 1--'1 (/.) --i ;:c ........ n -I en ::: to I ~ ::: Q47236 n47?.37 047:?36 (147239 G47:?4C! G47241 0'+7:.''f~ r.47:>43 ~IJ7244 :)47245 04 7?4 6 0"-7247 Ct. 7;"4€ n4n49 0'+725C ~47;51 ll4 72r:·~ Ci47253 '1117:'54 r.4ncss 'Jlf 7256 C47257 0 '~ 7?56 !)47"!:9 '.:ti72!:C C1«i72&1 C47;>(,2 ri47263 '>47?f.4 0472!>5 'J4 77H: (l47267 C'f7:!6S !:41~b9 Ol.f7:'711 047271 04 7272 047273 U4 7:>7'f 047275 047?76 0't 7277 r~nrn 047~79 047:'80 0472P.l 9199 -JT DIST ~ORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING OAT( 9/25/79 PAGE ~EPORT NU~BER AP~3 . 1 ( COUNTY SANITATIO~ OISTRIC?S OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR A.w.c. CALIFORNIA ACTIVE S4LES co., INC. ADVANC£0 ELECTRONICS ALCO TRA~SPORTATION CO. AMERICAN CYANIMID COMPANY ANIXTER PHUZAN ARTESIA IMPLEKtNTS & PARTS CO. ASSOCIATED OF LOS ANGELES "THC A.T. & s.F. RAILROAD CO. 13MJK f..MEFCICMD BA~NING UATTERY CO. BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS JM:Es tlDJ: H. eOPfR ~AGNETC SERVICEt INC. BbYLE ENGI~EERING CORP E0 ~RAATELIE:N DUILDING ~EVSt INC. E.D. DULLARD CO. R. P. BURKE CORPORATION C t R RECONDITIONING CO. CS COMPANY CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC• C4LJF. A~soc. OF SAN. AGENCIES JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS CH(STEF. PtUL CO. CllfVRON u.s.A., i:Nc. COLLEGE LUMDER CO., INC. COM~ERC[ STATIONERS ANO PRINTERS CO. CONSOLIDATED ELECT~JCAL DIST. CON~OLJDATED RfPRODUCTIONS CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO CO~TROL SPECIALISTS• JNC• COOPCR E~ERCY SfRVICES COSTA M~~A AUTO PAPTS• INC. 6YRGN L. CHUM[, INC. CUHTIN MATPESON SCIENTIFIC DAILEY CONSTRUCTION SERVICE P.F:LPhI SYSTE.r-~s. INC. DEF:OY'~ TOP~OIL DODGE CON~TRUCTJON NEWS. DUN~ (~WA~DS CORP. E. A ST l·i f\ N , l l\i C • E'lfCTRIC n.ALANCING CO. ENGINffRI~G-SCIENCEt INC. ENGINEERS SAL[S-SERVICE CO. FILTER SUPPLY CO. CLAIMS PAlD 09/25/79 AMOUNT $1'f4.15 $204.81 $216.02 $lo. 99 SG,605.57 $96.40 $'f07.76 $941.66 s1.01s.30 $206.81 $42G.54 $179.(18 186.22 $79.25 Slt295.00 $126.00 . $60.97 $50.H $9,'+20.31 $260.00 $1,547 .11 $86.50 $165.00 s.oo $72.85 $2.396.54 !.124.Hl $69.58 $365.61 s:.5,989.84 S6,9A2.75 $~0. Lt 0 S.2.15.05 $77.09 $15,32'1.84 $34 ·'•2 $224.70 s2,soo.oo sioo.10· $628.05 $383.40 $283.82 £75.00 $3,123.00 $!lf5.QO $394 .11 DES CR IPTI ON CONTROLS CARTON STAPLES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS FREIGHT CHEMICALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES INSPECTION CONTRACT TRAVEL EXPENSES TRUCK BATTERIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ENGINE PARTS SURVEY 3-20-4 Al.R FARE REIMBURSEMENT PUBLICATIONS SAFETY SUPPLIES CONTRACT PW-072 AND CONTRACT PW-074 COMPRESSOR REPAIR VALVES LAB SUPPLIES CONFERENCE REGISTRATION VOIDED VALVES GASOLINE LUMBER OFFICE "SUPPLIES ·ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION . ,CHLORINE CONTROLS ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS . CONTRACT PW-076 .LAB SUPPLIES LEGAL ADVERTISING 11-13-2 .EDP PROGRAMMING GRAVEL SUPPLY LEGAL ADVERTISING PW-24-1 PA I NT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ENGINE REPAIR VALUE ENGINEERING P2•24 PI PE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS FUND UO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSIN~ DATC 9/25/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 2 = ti::' I ... N. :: COU~TY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/25/79 ~AP.RANT ~O. ...... ---:i. rn·.- ~·· _.;:::,,•. "::i:t:: co ..... )::> I r t::::1 t--4 (/') -:-I. ::::c t--4 .r> -:-I '"' :: c::J I N .... ... 0 4 728;> 0 4 72~3 047"84 047;>R5 047286 C47287 (H1 721Hi ~A72B7 047;-9r 047;'91 OA7292 r.4nr:?~ '.}47294 (14 7~9!:> r: b. 7 :'9 6 C'47:.'97 04 7?98 P4n99 f.4 7 ~(!0 04 7301 c,4·1:!.r2 l'J4 73!)3 04730'+ r?47305 CA7.,06 04 73rJ7 047;::nR r47?:09 (·1•7310 ~47?.ll r 1+n12 (·47:1il3 r.1i1:.14 (·"7~15 ,, 47:'·16 (l47?,17 fl47316 0 1.47319 C4"T?.n C"4n21 P,41?·2? P,1;1?·23 047!-~4 r.47:-25 .. £'47326 047?·27 ( VENDOR FI LTR 0 COMP.ANY FISCHFR & PORTER CO. FLUOR ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, FOOTHILL FEED CO. FOREMOST THREADED PRODUCTS CLIFFORD A. FORKEkT FOUNTtJN VALLEY LOCK & SAFE FRICK-GALLAGHER MFG. FUSES UNLI MI TEO G. ~. GALLO~AY CO. .GENERAL CLECTRIC SUPPLY G~~[RAL TflfPHON[ CO. J.O. GILBERT & ASSOCIATES DON GREEK & ASSOCIATES GROTH CHEVROLET CO. HS.K SALES HALP~[N SUPPLY co.· THE HANDYMAN HAr.~OR P.ADIATOR CHl.R LE s G. HAROY' me. H.'~HRIS CONVEYOH CO. HAUL-A~AY CONTAINERS HE~D~ICKS G.M.c., INC. OAVto A. HODGSON HOOKER CHE~lCALS & PLASTICS CO HOUSE or ~ATTERJES HQ~AP.D SUPPLY CO. CITY OF HUNlINGTON BEACH H:CUSTP.l H · $/IF( TY SIGNS Mf:'G. I~T[RNATIGNAL HARVESTER CQ• BRYON JACK~UN PU~P DIVISION JOHNS Of·; CONTROL~. we. KCE~AN PIPE & ~UPPLY CO. KI~G P.fARI~G, J~C. KNOX IN~U~TFIAL SUPPLIES D~ .• F:or:rn T c. y. KOH l & N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO L.P.t.:.~., INC. LAf<RY'S ~~Ll1G. MATERIALSt ·HJC. lAllRS£rJ COLClR L/.B LEE t FO CO~SULTINd ENGR. LE~CO f.L(CTRIC CO. RAY E. LEWI!, LIET2AU Pt.TTfRNS., INC. LIFECO~-S~FETY srRVICE SUPPLY LIFTEX SLING~, INC. INC. AMOUNT .• $166.67 S'+t003el2 Sl5t557.58 t23.85 $498.'+2 f.957.20 $193.47 144.SlJ t4 22 .·a9 $6,010.20 $120.~lf $lft525.99 s2,21a.s1 $2,357.50 $107.11 $7'+.33 $361.35 SlF.7.48 $19·50 $35.05 $93lf e'+8 $220.00 •$llf8. 73 $9.00 $1,573.25 $130-51 S2t310.69 uo.13 $33.80 s25.53 1-27.R9 $l'lq.Rl Slt596.98 u. 25~ • 1" :Pt 0 • n 0 $200.00 s 1 0 ' 4 3 0 • lf4 . $2H.33 · · ·s;. 75 .• % $65.'+6 $9,619.l\4 $1?S.7.1 $47.75 s2.,226.oo $235.64 i1n&.n ( l'ESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES JPL EVALUATION TRUCK PARTS SMALL TOOLS SURVEY 5-21 AND SURVEY P2-23~6 DOOR LOCKS FREIGHT ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SCOPE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE EIS/EIR SURVEY 2-SR-1 AND ENGINEERING COYOTE CANYON TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ACETYLENE HOSE TRUCK PARTS TRUCK REPAIR CtEANfNG COMPOUND CONVEYOR RENTAL TRASH DISPOSAL TRUCK PARTS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE CHEMICALS BATTERIES VALVES WATER USEAGE SAFETY SIGNS TRUCK PARTS FREIGHT VALVES PIPE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES. SMALL TOOLS WAIVER APPLICATION UNIFORM SERVICE WELDING SUPPLIES GRAV El: SOl?P('l' ~s· F.JLM::P.ROCESSING ENGR.:HYORAULrC RELIABILITY TRUCK PARTS TRAVEL EXPENSES IMPELLER PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES SHALL TOOLS ::: .Fur-~o r.Jo to .. ~. ~1~9 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 9/25/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP4J I VJ :: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS -OF ORANGE COUNTY . :;:t: 00 :t> I r. d t--4 en . -:-i ::;o -..... n ~ (/) IJAP.P.Af'!T NO. Cl4B2R C47:!·2o c 't 7 ~3 0 C47:'·31 l'.'47332 D4n.:B ~47334 fl47?.35 C47Z36 P.473.37 l)ll 7?,3P. 04;:39 Cl.i7~l!O c 4 7 31: l (' 1t 7 34 2 ~4 7346 ~"7347 'J <i 7 34A e1113~9 P.'4735('1 ~4B51 047.:!52 0" 7353 ·04 73~4 ri473~5 :'t:7:11% G47357 04./?.58 C'47 ~5-:1 (\47.%0 i)l.;~561 (l4B6:? !) 4 7363 . ~47:"~lt !'!472'(~~ C'f 73n6 ~473(,7 t:''• 7~·fi8 0473£;9 n 4 73 7CI C4Pl71 047372 047:!.73 VENDOR LOOMIS AIRCRAFT, I~C. THE LOOSE LEAF HOUSE L05 ANGELES CHEMICAL CO. THE CHARLES LO~E CO. ROHERT J. LUNG & ASSOCIATES MASTER 8LUEPRI~T & SUPPLY MCCALLA SROS. PUMP & DRILLING MCM~STC~-CARR SUPPLY CO. MILLERS PRI~TERY ~·oTOROLA, I~C. l\'.Fi. Pf'OOUCTS NATIONAL CASH ~f GTSTER NE~APK EL~CTRO~ICS CITY OF N[~PORT BEACH OAKlTE PRODUCTS, INC. 0 X Y G ~-N $ E. P V I C E PACIFIC TELEPHONE PAR PRESS HUSINESS FORMS, INC. PA.RTS UNLIMITED M.C. PATTEN CORP. PEAT, H•RWICK, MITCHELL & CO. POSTMAST(R HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE PRODUCTOOLt INC. PROTECTO -FLASH, INC. RAl~~dw DISPOSAL CO. THE' REGISTER OENNTS l1. RE"IO • ~EYNOLD ILUMINYM SUPPLY·CO. RODDING CLEA~;a:G MACHINES,· INC SA~ DifGO PIPELJ~E CO. SA~TA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS SEtRSt ROEHUCK ~ CO. SJi,'\LLER & LOHR, INC.• SH~"tROCK SUPPLY SHE?llAP.O MACHINERY CO. SHEn~r~ ~ILLIA~S co. SOUTH ORANGE SUPPLY SOUTHERN CALIF. EDI.SON CO. SO. CAL. GtS CO. SO. CALIF. ~ATFR CO. SOUTtirnN COUNTIES OIL CO. SOUTHWEST SE~ER EOUJPMENT SPAR~Lf TTS DRINKING WATER STANLEY PAPfP co., INC. SHROW STEEL CLAIMS PAID 0?/25/79 AMOUNT .. $137.50 ·s95.lf0· S20 1fel6 $3-\0.80 $159.00 $158.79 $25t443.31 $180.53 $137.12 $261.21 $936.97 $520.El~· .$23.tO $9.'15 $52'4.98 $87.31 $250.73 $49.29 $930.31 SP.5.75 $4t302.00 $500.00 $24.CO $4'1.23 $301.95 $107.10 $2,645.82 .$37.93 $795.00 $300.00 $32,1)26.4(, :tHS.50 $17. 22 $1,096.00 $207.52 $332.75 $258.91 $105.07 S513t0'!9.lf9 $3t'I06:31 $8.42 $7,209.80 $357.61 $651.1q $8'4.75 $2t230.27 DtSCRIPTI ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES CHEMICALS PUMP PARTS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES CONTRACT E-090 AND PUMP PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES TYPE SETTING COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT PIPE SUPPLIES . TIME CARDS . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASES TELEPHONE OFFICE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS STRlP CHARTS ANNUAL AUDIT POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING'.ICE SMALL TOOLS SAFETY SIGNS TRASH DISPOSAL ADVERTISING .TRAVEL EXPENSES STEEL STOCK 3-20-3 INSPECTJON RELPCATE PIPE 3-20-4 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR SHALL TOOLS ENGINEERING BIG C.ANYON SHALL TOOLS TRUCK PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES PLUMBING PARTS POWER NATURAL GAS WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL TRUCK PARTS BOTTLED WATER PAPER PRODUCTS STEEL STOCK 3 ( • ~FUND NO .·.l::" ._ ::: Wt.RR ANT 047374 O't7375 C4737(, Olf 7377 047378 0'+7379 04n.so · .. :t> (' 473A1 c;-, 0'17382 ·C!J 047383 ·-C'473M t=j 04n,r,5 :t> fl473P.6 _.......,. 0 4 "/ 38 7 -:-i 04n.P.A m (147389 3 ~lf7~90 :;t: 04 7391 ;00 047392 ; I 04E93 I 01+73~4 :t> ('47.3')5 r-047:!96 r-r,47~97 -t'::' ll47~98 ~ 047?i9CJ ·en -I 047400 :::0 C4740l ....... 0'47402 Cl . -I en NO. 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAT( 9/25/79. PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS• OF. ORANG( COUNTY VENDOR SUPER CHEM CORP THE SUPP LI ER S J. UAYNC SYLVESTER TFI BUILDING MATERIALS TAYLOR-OUl\N TAYLOR-JETT CO. TECHNICAL BOOK CO. TEGLEN -AIRDRAULICS THOR TEMPORARY Sf RVICES J. T. THORPE, INC. TIHVEL AUFFS TRUCK & AUTU SUPPLYt INC. TMININC LABORATORIES u.s. PLASTIC CORP. UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. UNITED PARCEL S~RVICE UNITtD STATES EQUIP~ENT CO., INC. VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VALVE & PRIMER CORP. VAF:F:Ct H;C. YESTER~ ~IRE & ALLOYS· XEROX COi-!PUTER x=:~ox CORP. ZJP TEMP0~4RY PERSONNEL DON~LD Le FOX JA!-':ES ['. SHARP 0 0 r~ A. L 0 W ll'HJ JOHN C~~OLLO ENGINEERS JOHN CtP.OLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN CLAIMS PAID 09/25/79 AMOUNT S837 elJO· $261.03 $521.59 $37.38 $'460.99 !.818.06 s2s.02 $l q. 38 $If" 8 .13 i:rno .21 $92.00 $660.90 $13.00 $46.53 $21.34 $20.H $697.'42 Slt056.69 $251.16 $17 .;.H $280.90 S5t3~6.72 s2.n1 • .sCJ $l OB .6A $240.% $262.00 S.583.37 S6t537.70. Sl3t690.67 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/25/79 SUMMARY 112 OPER FUND 112 ACO FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND #3 FIR FUND #5 OPER FUND #5 ACO FUND #7 OPER FUND #11 OPER FUND #11 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 ACO FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT. OPER FUND CORF WORKING CAP. FUND ------------------~--------------- AMOUNT $ 1,988.04 1,900.30 4,564.69 300. 00 . 33,321.46 9,305.96 1,096.00 568.68 636.53 237.33 2,231. 12 779.20 5.46 73,189.59 126,386.52 58,513.-75 DESCRIPTION JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES PETTY CASH PLUMBING PARTS TRUCK PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES PUBLICATION PUMP PARTS TEMPORARY ACCOUNTING HELP CONTROLS AIR FARE' TRUCK PARTS TESTING P2-23 LAB SUPPLIES GASOLINE OEllVERY SERVICE COMPRESSOR PARTS PI PE SUPPLIES VALVES FREIGHT FRAME TORCH DATA PROCESSIN'G XEROX REPRODUCTION TEMPORARY RECEPTIONIST CASA CONFERENCE CASA CONFERENCE CASA CONFERENCE ENGR. FACILITIES PLAN AND ENGR. P2-25 ENGINEERING P2~23 ( TOTAL CLAIMS PAID SEPTEMBER 25, 1979 ( 5,024.63 ,• ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ____ NA __________________ _ C.O. N0. _____ 1 __________ ~------- CONTRACTOR: TRIAD MECHANICAL, INC. DATE __________ o_c_to_b_e_r __ l~,.._1_9_7_9 ______ __ Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at JOB: Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17 ------------------------~------------------~----------------------------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~) $ 2,174.62 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additio~s to or deductions !rom·the contract price are here~y approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated August 17, 1979 ADD: and Districts'letter dated September 14, 1979. Contract plans showed that the Contractor was to tie into an-existing underground 6-inch duptile iron pipe at four places. When the pipe was e~posed, it was.found to be 8-inch transite instead. This change order cov~rs the cost to the Contractor for providing special connections.to the -t;ransite pipe. TOTAL ADD .· No.time extension this change order. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Cl1anges . This Chang:c (ADD) ~:JIDnt{R) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved: $2,174.62 $2,_174.62 $ 487,78'1.00 $ 0.00 $ 2,174.62 $ 489,958.62 ' TRIAD MECHANICAL',· INC. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California · lly ------------~----------~~~----By--------------------~------~---- Cont rue tor-Chief Engineer . : . . : : .: "C" .~GEND.~ ITEr1 #9(B) 1~.LL DI STR I CTS . "r" v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG~ COUNTY P. O. UOX 3127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 r • Page 1 of 4 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. __ C_-_0_6-_1_0_7_3-_1_4_0 ____ __ \w) C.O. N0. ___ 6~------~--------- CONTRACTOR t H. C. Smith Construction Company DATE September 26, 1979 ------------------------~------- JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6 Amount of this Ch~mgc Order (ADD) $ 14, 521. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following "changes in the contract and/or contract work arc· hereby authorized and as compcnsati on therefor, the fol lowing ' additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby appro~ed. Item A The rotation of the return activated sludge pumps located in East Secondary Sludge Pump .Station and Waste Acti viated SI udge Pwnps .in West Secondary Sludge Pump Station were revised from counterclockwise·, as shown in co.ntract drawings, to clockwise rotation. This change was directed to minimize maintenance costs and inventories for spare parts by having all similar equipment with identical rptation.: ADDED COST: · EA"fENSI ON OF TIME: Item B $ 673.00 0 Calendar·Days The· inner cac;ing of the elevators in the East and West Secondary Sludge Pump Stations\w) were filled with oil saturated sand to prevent corrosion of the interior surface of this cas~ng. No provisions were incorporated in contract drawings to account for existing grotmd ~ater conditions which could accelerate corrosion. ADDED COST: EXTENSION OF TIME: Item C . . $2,246.00 ·o Calendar Days The contractually specified system of waterproo~ing the south wall of Plant Water Pump Station could not be applied based on the proximity" of the wall of Lindstrom Tunnel (a District responsibility) and the method of supporting this tunnel (a Contractor responsibility). A revised waterproofing system was appr~ved by the Districts utilizing Perrnapol 305. This ch,mge order l'epresents the Districts' portion of the additional costs. ADDED.COST: EXTENSION OF TIME: Item D $2,055.00 0 Calendar Days The Aeration Roof Tank drains were revised from non-traffi~bearing units, originally specific'-\ to Josrun Series 23510 roof drains.· These slabs are designed for vehicular traffic loads and this change was issued to reconcile the specification error. ADDED COST: EXTENSlON OF TIME: . ".D-1" .~GE~·JD,~. -IT~M f9(c) -.~LL .DIST~ICTS $ 657 .00 · 0 Calendar Days "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of 4 CHANGE ORDF.R GRANT NO. ___ c_-_o_6_-_10_7_3_-1_4_o ______ _ C. O. NO. 6 -----------~------~-----CONTRACTOR: H. C. Smith Construction Company ------------~--~~------------------- DATE _________ s_e_p_t_c_m_b_e_r~2 _6 _, _1_9_7_9 __ __ JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Trea.tment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6 Item E .. This changed work consisted of added costs to add reinforced concrete decks to nir plenwn openings in Purge Air Fan Rooms/Kennison Tunnel in four locations. These decks were o~ittcd in original contract drawings and added to contrnct per Supple- mentary Drawing SD-C-7. ADDED COSTS: EXTENSION OF TIME: Item F $2., 861. 00 0 Calendar D~ys Necessary fittings were installed in plant ··water. feeder lines to enable the Districts to install piping for flushing the sewage air relief valves. These connections were not incorporated in original contract drawings but are necessary to provide .for extension of required piping for plant operations of these relief valves. ApDED COSTS: EXTENSION OF TIME: Item G- $1, 343. 00 0 Calendar Days Relocated discharge headers for. P2-23-6 (C-06-1073-140) dewatering system for disposal into Clarifiers in lieu of original disposal into forebay of Foster Booster Pumping Station. rhe discharge piping was located in west embankment revision contract, awarded after P2-23-6., for widening and lining the Santa Ana River Channel by Environmental· Management Agency. This change was issued to coordinate abutting public works contracts.· ADDED COSTS: EX'fENSION OF TIME: Item H $1,518.00 0 Calendar Days Revised electrical conduit sizes originally designed into P2-23-6 contract for 10 HP .electrical drive motors for purge air fans. Design performance analysis by P2-23-2 contractor (C-06-1073-130) resulted in requirement for 30 .HP for these purge air fans. This change was directed to accomodatc the increase in conduit sizes for· increased horsepower rcqui rements of 30 HP motors. ADDED COSTS: EXTENSION OF TIME: . $2, 305. 00 0 C.alcndar Days f.:GEfm.~ ITEM f9(c) .-t\LL DISTPlCTS "n-,.," !.• '- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 3 of 4, · . CHANGE ORDER GRANT No. ___ c_-_0_6-_1_0_7_3-_1_4_0~--~v C. 0. NO. 6 --~------~----------DATE September 26, 1979 ------:""~~----~--~---=~----- CONTRACTOR: H. C. Smith Construction Company ~~----~~~~~~--~~---=-,,_,,,,;,,~- JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No •. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6 Item I Pressure manhole frame and cover not propcrl)' ident'i'fied as s.ame on Drawing 1-507 for Junction Box No. 2 which was depicted as s·tondard unit. This drawing omission . was corrected by this change and represents the ad<led cost for 4iffercncc between units. ADDED COSTS: EA"TENSION OF TIME: . $ 201. 00 0 Calendar Days "Relocated existing electrical conduit installed under P2-23-2 contract and battery . charger disconnect to allow· installation of new c;able tray from Distrubi tion Center "A" to new Plant.Water Pump Station under P2-23-6. Lp.ck of contract interface evaluation . resulted in interference between conduit entering end of P2-23-3 (C-06-1073-120) ·cable tray to be attached at the same end plate location. ADDED COSTS: EXTENSION OF TIME: Item K $ 949.00 0 Calendar Days Deduct $287.00 from Change Order No. 5, Item D. total $4,383.00. Stated total $4,670.00, revised CREDIT DUE ON OVERPAYMENT: El'TENSION OF "Tllvlli: . . ''!l-3" . . A~P!D!\ ·rrEr1 #9 ( c) -~·~LL. DISTRICTS . . $ (287.00) o Calendar Days "D-3" • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 6127 -l08l1r• ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 4 of 4 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-140 C.O. N0. ___ 6 __________________ _ CONTRACTOR: H. C. Smith Construction Company DATE September 26, 1979 ------~---~--~~~~~---- JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6 Contract Time Adjustments Original Contract Date Original Contract Time O~~ginal Completion Date Time Extension This C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date December 29, 1977 1000 Calendar Days September 23, 1980 0 Calendar Days · 118 Calendar Days 1118 Calendar Days January 19, 1979 It is mutually agreed by both parties to this contract that by execution of Change Order No. 6, all time extensions agreed· and allowed by Change Order. No. I thru Change Order No. 6, inclusive, do adequately and fairly adjust the contract completion time for the contract work. Or.I g i na 1 C~ntract Price $ 30,670,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 407,518.00 This Cha.nge '(ADD) <~~~a~¥> $ 14, 521. 00 Amended Contract Price $ 31,092,039.00 Board authorization dat~: October 10, 1979 Approved: H. C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION .COMPANY .._; By ------------C-o_n_t_· r_a_c_t-or' .. ~Gtnn.~ ITEM #9 < c) . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Dy ____ ~--------------~--~~~---Ch i cf Engineer !\LL DISTRICTS · . • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG~ COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A ________________ _ c.o.· No. i V CONTRACTOR: PASCAL & LUDWIG I INC. DATE~ _______ o_c_t_o_b_er __ 1_, __ 1_9_7_9 ________ _ Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at JOB: ______ ~~-R_o_t~h~r.~o~ck __ o_u_t_f_a_l~l.__B~o_o~s~t_er.~._s_t~a_t_i~o_n~,~Jo~b __ N_o~·~J_-~3_-_l __ · ----------------~------ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (>OeOU~ $ 2,142.51 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deducti~ns from the contract price ar~.hereby aRproved. · ADD: l. 2. After the job was bid~ it was decided to add extra structure to the fuel tank supports for ·full earthquake protection. (See· Contractor's letter dated August 16, 1979 and· Districts' le~ter dated September 10, 1979.) Covers costs to the Contractor for revisions to the engine cooling water piping which will provide better access to the engine for maintenance. TOTAL ADD No extension of time for this change order. ·Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ·This Change (ADD) ~uom) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved: $1,026.56 $1,115.95 $2,142.51 $ 247,225.00 $· 0.00. $ 2,142.51 $ 249,367.51 ' PASCAL & LUDWIG, .INC. COUtffY SAfH TATI ON 01·srR I CTS OF Orange County, California ·By ______ ~----~----~----~------By __ ~----~--------~--------~-- Contractor Chief Engineer .,,E ~, .A~~NDA IftM #9(0) -~LL DISTRICTS "E II : RESOLUTION NO. 79-137 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. PW-078 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF coµNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND ll·OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RESTROOM FACILITIES FOR PERSONNEL OFFICE AND OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM AND SHOWER FACILITIES, JOB NO. P\41-078 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. t, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specif1:cations and contract documents this d~y submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for RESTROOM FACILITIES FOR PERSONNEL OFFICE AND OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM AND SHOWER FACILITIES, JOB NO. PW-078 , are hereby approved and adopted;' and, • Section 2. That the Secretary be authori~ed and directed to advertise for .. \.,.I bids for.said work pursuant ·to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the Stat~ of California; and, "F~' Section 3: That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read ; and, Section 4. ·That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized and directed to open said.blds on behalf of the Boards of D 0 irectors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. AGEND,~ I TE~1 f 9 ( E) J~LL· DISPHCTS . . ' .. .. ·.· . ·.·• "F" ''h" . :.]· RESOLUTION NO. 79-138 APPROVING·PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. PW-068R A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS.OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANiTATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR REHAIHLITATION OF INCINERATOR NO. 2 AND RAM TABLES AT HEADWORKS "C", JOB NO. PW-068R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detail~d plans, speci.fications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for REHABILITATION OF INCINERATOR NO. 2 AND RAM TABLES AT HEADWORKS "C", JOB NO. PW-068R, are hereby approved and adopted; and, .Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. ·That the Secretary of the Boards ·and Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. AG~~DP IlEM #9(F) -·ALL DIST~ICTS •.. ~= --' •. . .-. Ill ~·. "G" RESOLUTION NO. 79-139 AWARDING SPECIFICATION NO. R-001 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REHABILITATION OF n~o (2) CLIMAX GAS eNGINES, SERIAL NOS. 46129 AND 46161, SPECIFICATION NO. R-001 * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Districts have published-Notice Inviting Bids for Rehabilitation of Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on September 6, 1979, publ~cly opened and read all bids submitted; and, WHEREAS, the sole bid received has. been eval~ated by the Districts' engineers and the bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately sixty-five (65) percent; and, WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer submitted a written recommendation that said bid be rejected; and, WHEREAS, on September 12, 1979, Resolution No. 79-129, rejecting all bids and authorizing the General Man.ager to negotiate a contract with Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc, for said job, was adopted by the Boards of Directors. NOW, THE~EFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and·ll of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of a negotiated contract be made to· Waukesha E.ngine Servicenter, Inc,. for Rehabilitation of Two (2) Climax Gas ~ngines, Serial Nos, 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001, and the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, ~ ''H-1" .. A<JENDA ITEM #9CG) .... ALL DISTRICTS· "H-1" .... Section 2. That the nego~iated contract for said Specification No. R-001 be awarded to Waukesha Engineservice Center, Inc. in the amount of $56,522.00, in accordance with their proposal and the terms and conditions of the specifications therefor; and, Section 3. That the ~eneral Manager is hereby authorize·d and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work on behalf of the Boards of Directors, pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979 • . "H-2" . AGENDA ·ITEM. #9(G} .. AL.L DISTRICTS-"H-2" ·. . ... . . . . .• . . . . . . .~. : . · .. • RESOLUTION NO. 79-140 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-069-1 . A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WET WEATHER CONTINGENCY PLAN AT COYOTE CANYON SLUDGE PROCESSING SITE, JOB NO. PW-069-1 .. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that· award of ·contract be made to Sully-Miller Contracting Company for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work ~re hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-069-1 be awarded to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the total amount of $187,186.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. '11lat the Chairman and S~cretary of District No •. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for: said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979 •. ·~ . "I" . ; . . . : . · .· ··: "r..E~'DJ\·\1Tc-·r·1 /}O(H) ·.'-/\.LL Dl~T 0 ICTS r l J -• • n L.. •. • • -· ' ' '-' • ' II I II I '' .'' Jj J. IJ • JOB NO. p:~-069-1 .. October 2, 1979 11:00 A.M. Wet Weather Contingency P~an at PROJEC.T TI'l'LE Coyote Canyon sludge Processing Site -PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construction 6f earthwork A.C. ~avement, P.V.C. lining, and other works. BUDGET. AMOUNT $ -------ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 200,000.00 REMARKS ~--~~------.:--~--~----~~--~----------~__;,---------~------- CON'l'RACTOR i: :Sully-Mille~ Contracti~~ Company Orange, CA · 2. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Azusa, CA . . 3. Delio Construction Co. Inc • Diamond Bar, CA .4. TOTAL BID $187,186.00 $214,362.00 No Bid I have reviewed tne proposals received for the above project and recommend award to Sully-Miller Contracting Company of Orange, CA,· in the bid amount of $187,186.00, as the lowest· and best bid. · . II J" ~~.D~ Thomas M. Dawes Senior .Engin~er I concur with the above reconunendation .to award Job No. PW-069-1. II J" .~ -~ • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE '..,.! September 26, 1979 018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910. (71.C) 962-2411 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM J. Wayne Sylvester Ted Hofi;man Bid Specification E-099, Generator Set Sealed bids were opened at 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 25, 1979, for furnishing and delivering one (.1) new skid mounted, diesel driven generator set. This unit_ is to be used at the Coyote Canyon dump site to provide lighting and ·power for the maintenance e~uipment. The tabulations are as follows: ITEM I Generator Set With Housing ITEM I-A (Alternate). Generator Set Less Housing "-"' Generator Equipment Co. $7,422.12 $6,627.12 Los Angeles Equipment Service Co. . Long Beach · 7,968.02 7,626.70 . , Bolstad Sales & Service San Pedro Diesel Energy Systems Huntington Beach No -Bid 7,851.35 The staff recommends the award be made to.Generator Equipment Company, low bidder, for Item I for their total bid of $7,~22.12 including sales tax. The value of tpe housing will provide weatherproofing and vandal protection. The expenditure of funds for this purchase is listed in the Capital outlay Rev: lv·ng Fund, Schedule "B" (Non-Grant Funded Projects), Item 1-h. Toy~bu e this section is $200,000. '\L£ Ted Hof Chief of TH/yh A;~~~ & Property w. ·N. Clarke, Superintend~nt . . . ~ . . . . :· : •, . . . ... \ II!( II . ·~GE~IlA ITEM #9(1) -~ALL DI~TPICTS "K" • RESOLUTION NO. 79-141 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REI~1BURSEMENT FOR ·EXPENSES OF RETIHED DIRECTOR DONALD \VINN' S REPRESENTATION IN CASA A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,. ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF RETIRED DIRECTOR DONALD WINN'S REPRESENTATION IN THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES THROUGH THE ANNUAL 1980 MEETING * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, retired Director Donald Winn has previously been active in the County Sanitation Districts·of qrange County's participation in the California· Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA); and, WHEREAS, retired Director Donald Winn is presently serving as a member of the CASA Board of Directors; and, WHEREAS, said term on the CASA Board of Directors will not expire until the close of the CASA Annual Conference in August, 1980. NOW, 'IHEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County· sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the continued representation of retired Director Donald Winn,in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies through said Association's Annual Work Conference in August, 1980, is hereby approved; and that during said period, Donald Winn shall be entitled to receive the. sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day, but in no event shall the representative's total compensation exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month; and, Section 2. That when traveling on such business, said representative shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the course "L-1" AGEND:~ ITEM t~9(K) (2). ... ·. . ... · .. ·. • .. .~LL .DISTRICTS "L-1" .. . . 0 of said travel in accordance with the following schedule: :Conunerical Transportation -per actual invoice Hotel -room rate per actual statement.for occupany Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee Ground Transportation -as itemized Personal Vehicle First 1-150 miles per month @ $.15/mile -Next 151-600 miles per m.onth @ $.12/mile Next 601+ miles per month @ $.06/mile Telephone Service -as itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -Act~al cost of the representative's personal meals and incidentals required-during the course of the conference or meeting. Section 3. That the authorization provided for by this resolution shall expire after CASA's Annual Work Conference in August, 1980. \..,,! ··. · ·.' ·· PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. ·"t-2" "L-2" "N" RESOLUTION NO. 79-150 APPROVING PURCI JASE AND SALE AGREEMENT RE DISTRICT PROPERTY WITH H/\RBOR llOULEV/\RD INVESTMENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP A RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF DISTRICT PROPERTY IN 'IHE VICINITY OF HYLAND AVENUE TO HARBOR.BOULEVARD INVESTMENT·GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Districts are owners of certain real.property located westerly of Harbor Boulevard and northerly of Sunflowe~ Stree~ in the City of Costa Mesa; and, WHEREAS, the Districts own·and maintain underground trunk sewer lines and facilities with the properties which it owns; and, ·WHEREAS, the Pistricts have received·an offer to purchase its fee interest .in said property at the fair market value reserving unto said Districts an easement for sewer line purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6 ~f Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement between Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited.Partnership, and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6, a~ sellers, for the sale of approximately 4, 100 square fe.et,-as more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, of real property owned by the Districts for the sum of $24,500.00 and reserving an easement for the same area to the Districts, as recommended by the Districts' General Manager and General Counsel, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign ·the agreement with said buyers, together with all other documents necessary to cffect,said transaction, subject to approval of form and content by the Districts' General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at:a,;r:-egttlar meeting held October 10, 1979 • . . AGE~DA ITEM.#9(M)(2) -DISTPICTS 1 & 6 "N" RESOLUTION NO. 79-151 AUTIIORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED OF DISTRICT PROPERTY TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM HARBOR BOULEVARD INVESTMENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF -COUNTY .SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED OF DISTRICT PROPERTY TO HARBOR BOULEVARD INVEST- MENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AUTI-IORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM HARBOR BOULEVARD INVESTh1ENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RE TRUNK SEWER LINE IN TI-IE VICINITY OF HYLAND AVENUE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . WHEREAS, TI-IE Boards of Directors have approved an agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, to sell certain real property owned by the Districts consisting of approximately 4,100 square feet in exchange for payment of the swn of $24,500.00 to Districts and reserv~ng an easement to Districts for sewer line purposes in the same parcel • . . . NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'Ibat the Chairman and Secretary of District ~o. 1, acting for itself and on behalf o~ District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute the necessary Grant Deed conveying the Districts'.i~teres~ to Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, in that certain real property des_cribed and shown on Exhibits ·"A" and "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, upon completion and satisfaction of all terms and conditions of that purchase and sale agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group; and, Section 2. That the certain Grant of Easement dated , wherein ~--~~~~~~ an easement in the vicinity of Hyland Avenue, for s~nitary sewer purposes, is granted to County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6, is hereby accepted from Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership; and, ""0-1" DIST~ICTS ·1 ~' 6 "0-1" Section 3. That the Secretary of the Boards ·of Directors of County Sanitation ·~ Districts Nos. 1 and 6 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the official records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. -· .· . ' "0-2" "0-2" • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AV~NUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE. ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_A~--------~--~- V C.O. N0. ____ 1 __________ ~--~-- CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS·, INC •. DATE ________ ~o_c_t_o_b_e_r __ l~, __ 1_97_9 ________ _ OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 00.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes ·in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME •. The Contractor requested a delay in starting construction, adequate time.for drying of the river bed. The delay did not cause the District problems and avoided closure of the Santa Ana River Reg~onal Bike Trail during the peak SUiml1er · season. Contract is hereby granted an extension of TOTAL TIME EXTENION 96 Calendar Days 96 Calendar Days · ..... SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date . Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension . Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date April 26, 1979 60 Calendar Days June 24, 1979 96 Calendar Days 96 Calendar Days . 156 Calendar Days September 28, 1979 Original Contract Price $ 189,970.00 Prev. Auth. Change5 $ 0.00 .. This Change ~ ~-Oh'VUM) $ 0.00 Amended Board authorization date: o t b 10 1979 c o er , JOHN A. 1\RTUKOVICH SONS, INC. ·By --~------~--~----------~~~--- Contractor . :·. 11pu .. ·f\·Gc~.tDl\ .I·T·E· t1 :,_~g .(N) L., . .. .1 i •. Contract Price $ 189,970.0b Approved: COUlffY SJ\t.J I TAT I ON DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By __ ~~------------------~--~---- Chief Engineer . ~ !llSTP.lCT 2 "P" • RESOLUTION NO. 79-152-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT.NO. 2-SR-l AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-1, on September 28, 1979; and.,, . . Section·2. That by letter, Lowry and Associates, District's engineers, has · recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms ~f the contract; and, ~ Section 3. '11lat the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred with said engineer'·s recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Contract No. 2-SR-l is hereby.ac~epted as complete in accordance with the terms.of the contract therefor, dated April 26, 1979; and, . . Section S. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to e~ecute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-l, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. ~.G~~.!DA. IT~f1 #(o) -DI ST~I CT 2 ·• .· ''Q" '"S.-1" • RESOLUTION NO. 79-154-2 · APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF BREA RE ANNEXATION AND DEFERMENT OF FEES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF BREA AND PROVID- ING FOR THE DEFERMENT OF FEES WHEREAS, the City of Brea has requested annexation of certain property consisting of approximately 190 acres of inhabited territory; and; WHEREAS, the property which is the subject of the proposed annexation, is developed with approximately 276 connections to the District's sewer system . located in the Carbon Canyon area within the. limits of ttie City of Brea; and, WHEREAS, the City wishes to have the connected proper.ties continue to receive service through the District's facilities and is therefore in the process of fbrming an assessment district for the purpose of financing a sewage collector· system to service the subject property and in order to pa.y. annexation fees and connection fees; and, WHEREAS, the District Board has, on ~une 13,-1979, previously authorized the District to enter into an agreement with the City of Brea, to provide deferment of sewer service charges in the Carbon .Canyon area. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOL VEs DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That certain agreement between the City of Brea, a municipal corporation, and the County Sanitation District No. 2 providing for the payment of annexation and connection fees on a deferred basis, is hereby approved. Sectio~ 2: That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute .·,~GE~JD,L\ ITEM t.~9(Q) -DIST~ICT 2 .. · "S-1" ·~'.S-2" said· agreement on behalf of itself in. form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND· ·ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 10th day of October, 197~~ . . .. .· .. . .· ~~G~MDA. ITEf1 #9(Q~ ~ ·n.IST~ICTS 2 ·... ·> ... · ... ~ .. ,,. . "S-?" ~ - • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 1 of J CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A __ ~------~------ C .O. N0·~---1~~~~-----~--~~ CONTRACTOR: .... JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. DATE ____ ~ ___ o_c_t_o_b_c_r~l_,~1_9_7_9 __ ~~--- JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CO~TRACT NO. 3-20-4 ------------------------------~--------------------------------------~---------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~) $ . 95,849.62 In accordance wi~h contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensati9n therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. In acco~dance with Section 10-4, subsection b.2.A., of the General Provision and Standard Specifications, the Contractor is to perform the following extra work. l. 2 .• Install a variable thickness asphalt overlay on Knott Avenue between Orangethorpe Avenue and Fullerton Creek Channel in accordance with City of Buena Park.rQquest. The work shall include removal of approximately 4340 square feet of existing deteriorated asphalt concrete and Lase material; pa.tching 4340 square feet of pavement; scraping existing pavement at curb to accept new overlay; placement of a seal coat; placement of approximately 780 to~s of asphaltic concrete; raising of manholes and water valve covers; installation of traffic loops; traffic control; all in accordance with District specifications and instructions; for lump sum · Install a sand slurry seal coat over existing roadbed, Fullerton Creek Channel to Artesia Boulevard; for lump sum 3. Additional cost to install one fiberglass manhole instead of a PVC lined concrete.manhole, for evaluation by District; for lump sum 4. 5. ·6. Install protective coating on ten (10) Distridt manholes, including surface preparation for lump swn Replace electrical conduit not.shown on plans, in kind, for lump sum Change in sewer siphon under Fullerton Creek Channel to include full encasement with reinforced concrete; for lump sum 7. Additional cost for installation and maintenance of traffic control delineat9rs, sign"s and striping on Artesia Boulevard at Santa Ana Freeway in accordance with Cal' Trans and District instructions, for lump sum .._..i a. Additional cost to manufacture and install spe~ial closure section at Rostrata Avenue to fit field condition at jobs terminun, for lump sum DISTrICT 3 $52,578.67 22,000.00 1,500.00 10,752.50 328.90 3,890.74 1,023.36 2,522.64 "T-1" .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0 • 13 0 X 8 1 2 7 -1 0 8 '• L• E LL I S I\ VE 1'1 U E FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of S CHANGE ORDER NA GRANT N0·------~--~------1~ C. 0. NO. 1 ------------------------DATE __ ~--~-o_c_t_o_b_e_r~l_, __ 1_9_7_9 ____ ~ CONTRACTOR: --------~~----~~----~~------~- JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. 9. KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4 Cost to remove the sides and deck of a reinforced concrete box at Knott Avenue and Eighth Street, for lump sum ~OTAL ADD: EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The Contractor is granted an extension of time for the following work items: 1. For .delays covered by the relocation of the San Diego Pipeline Co. gas transmission main: 2. For delays caused by the relocation of the Southern California Edison electrical duct servi.ng the Kraft Company plant: 3. Additional time required for extra work, th~s change order: ·4. For rainy ~eather (4 days) and s~~ggy weather· (2 days): TOTAL TIME EXTENSION .. • .. ; . . . . · . "T-2" . ,~GENDA. "i'fE}~ ft9 < R) ~. DI STJU CT 3 1,252.81 $95,849.62 10 calendar days ~ 15 calendar days 64 calendar days. 6 calendar days 95 calendar days "T-2" ".,_,/ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0. B 0 X B 1 2 7 -1 0 8 l1 lf ELL I S I\ VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 3 of 3 CHANGE ORDER ' GRANT NO. __ ~N_A~~-----­ C.O. NO. i ----~------~-----CONTRACTOR.: __ J_O_H_N_A_._A_R_T_u_K_o_v_I_C_H_s_o_N_s_,_I_N_c_. ___ _ 0 ATE October 1, 1979 ~---------__....;~-~---- KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTR?\CT NO. 3-20-4 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date ·original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order ·.Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised ~ompletion Date .Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. ~--~-----~~~­Contractor" Or.i g i na 1 December 28, 1978 180 Calendar Days June 25, 1979 95 Calendar Days ·95 Calendar Days 275 Calendar Days September 28, 1979 Contract Price $ L472,450 •. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Cha.nge (ADD) (IX~x) $ 95,849.62 Amended Cori tract Price $ 1,568,299.62 Approved: COUNTY S/\N I Tiff I ON DISTRICTS of Ornngc County, California Dy ----~~------~--~...______,~~ C h i c f E 11 ~J i n c e r "11 t~ 3" · AG~NDA Ii~M #9(R) -DISTRICT 3 "T-3" ..... · .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 . . . CHANGE' ORDER GRANT NO. NA --------------------~-c. 0. NO. 2 --------------------~----CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS·, INC. · DATE _________ o_c t_o_b_e_r __ l_, __ 1 _9_79 ____ ~--- JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4 --------------~--~~~~--~----~----~--~--------~---------~------------ ·Amount of this Change Order (1'.ntij (DEDUCT) $ 131.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes ·in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the foJlowing ~dditions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT.OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT: Item Change Est'd Quantities No.· Unit Description 1'.,rom To Difference 10. EACH Utility beams 2 0 2 @ 350/EACIL $ 700.00 12. C.Y. Encasement Cone. 50 2 48 @ 60/C.Y. 2,880.00 13. : ·r..F. Median curb 9,020 8,934 86 @ ~.50/L.F. 301.00 Total Deduct: $3, 881. 00 . .. \w) ADD: ·9. L.F. House laterals 75 153 78 @'25/L.F. $1,950.00 11. : EACH ·support walls 3 9 6 @ 300/EACH 1,800.00 Total Aq~: $3(750.00 TOTAL DEDUCT: $ 131. 0 00 .. Original Contract Price $ 1,472,450.00 Prev. Auth. Chunge:; $ 95,849.62 This Change· 6ft}{j{) (DEDUCT) $ (131. 00) Amended Contract Price $ 1,568,160.62 Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved: ,, JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orungc County, California vi ·By ------------~----------~-------By---------~----------------------- Contractor Chief Engineer '~.u~' AGE~DA ITEM #9Cs) -DIST~ICT 3 . . . "U" "V" RESOLUTION NO. 79-155-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * ~ * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4, on September 28, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's ~ngineers, has reconunended acceptance of said work as having.been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, . Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said e.ngineer' s recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Contract No. 3-20-4 is hereby accepted as complete in accord- ance with the ter~s of the contract therefor, dated De·cember 28, 1978; and, Section 5. That the District's Chief Engineer is h~reby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. ~etting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, is hereby approved; and, Section 7, That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. . ~ .. : ; . • ~GE~m.~ ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT 3 "V" . . "W-1" RESOLUTION NO. 79-156~3 AU1HORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH.CITY OF BUENA PARK TO INCORPORATE CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN ORANGETHORPE AVENUE INTO CONTRACT FOR ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-22-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DI.RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTiiORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF BUENA PARK TO INCORPORATE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN ORANGETHORPE AVENU~ INTO CONTRACT FOR ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-22-2 * * * * * * * * •.• * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the District, as part of its Master Plan of Trunk Sewers, proposes to construct an extension of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer from the existing terminal at Western Avenue easterly to Thomas Street; and, · WHEREAS, the City of Buena Park has entered into a contract for street improvements to Orangethorpe Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Stanton Avenue; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience and cost can be minimized by construction of said street improvements in that portion of Orangethorpe Avenue in which the proposed Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer is to be installed by deleting said work from the City's contract and including it in the District's Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer job. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of. County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Board· of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 hereby approves that certain agreement dated between County Sanita--------- tion District No. 3 at'ld the City of Buena Park to delete the portion of the City's proposed street improvements in Orangethorpe Avenue that _will be interrupted by the District's proposed construction of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer from the City's current public works contract and to incorporate· said work into the District's contract for construction of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-22-2, and providing for payment of the City's bid cost for said work to ~ the District; and, AGEHD.~ ri~ #~Cu> -DisTRICT 3 "W-1" . Section 2. That the Chairm~n and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel. P~SED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979 • .. "W~2" ~GEM~A IJ~M #9Cu) ~ ·QISTRICT 3 .. I "W-2" CITY 0 F BUEN A P A R K c A L F 0 R N A 9 0 6 2 0 6 6 5 O e E A C H B o U L E V A R o, P H O N E: (7 I 4) 5 2 I -9.9 o 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Wiiiiam J. o•Neil, Director September 18, 1979 ~1r. Ray E. Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Lewis: In respon'se to your letters of September 13, 1979, concerning the Knott Inter- ceptor Project and the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer Project, the follow~ng information is provided. Your proposal to sand slurry coat between Fullerton Creek Channel and Artesia Boulevard has been accepted by the City Council, agreeing to share equally the cost of the work with the Distr.ict. Your proposal for the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer was generally agreed to in principle. The Council requests the District prepare a more formal agreement between the Agencies, and that same be submitted for pur review. The Council wished to include in the scope of the agreement the stipulation that City funds to be paid to the District for resurfacing work would ·not be ·submitted to the District until such time as they are actually needed to make payment on the project. Very truly yours, · ~1d./L°>k~ w1112::%. o 'Neil "X" Director of Engineering Services and City Engineer WJO:pf "X" -1,.,,.J . 11y11· • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACI-I September 25, 1979 · Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation D~stricts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 Dear Ray: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (714) 640-2221 The City of Newport Beach would like to request that the District consider a joint project with the City·in connection with your . current plan: to replace the sewer main in Bayside Drive. Along the same -route as the District's sewer main, the City has an 18 11 • and a 411 water line that are in need of immediate replacement. Attached is a drawing showing the location of water lines in relation to your sewer main. If funds are available tne City is also considering the replacement·of the 6" A.C. line with 12 11 D.I. It is pr9posed that the District would be the· contracting agency with the City paying all of the cost of the water line and a proportionate share of the administrati~e ·and engineering costs. Sincerely, \~' JTD:bc Attachment '· cc: City Manager Public Works Director Cily Ilall 0 ~.3Q.O Ncwport.Boulcv~ird, Nc'''P(·>rt Beach, . .California 92G63 · :· ·'-AGENDi'},. ITE-r! ff.9(v) ~ DISTRICT 5 "Y" ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE" ORDER .. GRANT NO. ___ NA ________________ __ v C.O. N0. ____ 2 __ ~------------~-- CONTRACTO~: ____ A_L_B_E_RT~W_. __ D_A_V_I_E_S~,_I_N_C_~-----------DATE ________ ~o~c_to_b_e~r;;;_;l~,r,.....;.1~9~7~9--------- JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT.NO. 5-21 --------------~~--~~~----~:...-~--~----------~-------~----------------~-- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) . (DEDUCT) $ o.oo In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensatio~ therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The work required under this contract was.closely tied to the construction of the interim Santa Ana River improvements"by the County EMA. The . ·contractor is granted a 25-day time extension . caused by the late start of the EV.aA contractor. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION . . : . SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Cont+act Time Original Completion Date _Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Original May 24, 1979 90 Calendar Days August 21, 1979 25 Calendar Days 30·Calendar Days 120 Calendar Day~ September 20, 1979 Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes • .. This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved: $ $ $ $ 25 Calendar ~ays 357,000.00 6,103.31 0.00 363,103.31 cournv SANITATION DI STR 1 CTS OF Orange County, California ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. ·By ______________ ~----------------- Contrnctor . ~ .. (" ·, : ~ . "Z'' . ··p:GE~mp,. iTEM. ~~9(w) Dy ____________ ._.. ____ ~~~--~---- DISTP.ICTS 5 g 6 Chief Engineer 11-Y II L. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. OOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CH/',NGE ORDER GRANT NO. NA ---------------------~--c. o. N0. __ ~_3 __ ~~~~--------- CONTRACTO~: ALBERT w. DAVIES I INC. DATE ______ ~_o_c_t_o_b_e_r __ 1_,~1_97_9 ______ __ JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. 5-21 --------------~----~~------------------------------------------------------ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) · (0000~? $ 10,836.80 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are. hereby aP.proved. ADi:J°USTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Item Ch~nge Est'd Qua~tities- No. Unit Description From To · Difference 1 L.F. 42" v.c.P. 625 636.4. 11.4 @ 512/L.F. $ .. 5,836.80 5 EACH Delay in Const. 0% 50% 50% • @ 10, 000/EACH 5, 000. 00 TOTAL ADD: $10,836.80 Original Contract Price $ 357,000.00 Prcv. Auth. Changes $• 6,103.31. This Change (ADD) (0000~1{) $ 10,836.80 Amended Contract Price $ 373,940.11 Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved: ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC • ...._;' ·By ------------~~----·----~--~--- Contractor II AA" cournY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By __ ~----------------~------~--- Chief Engineer II P.A" RESOLUTION NO. 79-157 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-21 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD.OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO~~IA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-21 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Albert W-. Davies, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. 5-21, on September 20, 1979; and, Section 2, That by letter, L. D. King, Inc .. , Districts' engineers, has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in s·aid engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Contract No. 5-21 is hereby accepted as complete in accord- ance with. the terms of the contract therefor, dated May 24, 1979; and, Section 5. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is h~reby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6, That the Final Closeout Agreement with Albert W. Davies, Inc. setting forth the terms· and conditions for acceptance of Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No, 5 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation District No. 6 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED :\ND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. "BB" . . . ~ .. . .AGENDA ITEM #9Cv) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 . ~ . . : ... "BB" .. "CC" · . RESOLUTION NO. 79-159-7 AUTHORIZING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND AGRE- EMENT WITH ONE TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA\_IFORNIA, AUTHORl2ING AN EN- CROACHMENT PERMIT TO ONE TOWN CENTER DRIVE ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE WHEREAS, District presently has a subtrunk sewer facility in the vicinity of Bristol Street and northerly of the San Diego Freeway; and, WHEREAS, District's sewer facilities are located within an easement . across that certain property owned by One Town Center Associates, a Joint Venture (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"); and, WHEREAS, . Owner has constructed certain ~uildings, roadways and other improvements upon its property which have been determined to encroach into the District's easement area; and, WHEREAS, the District and Owner wish to enter into an agreement: reciting the respective rights and obligations of the parties relating to the encroachment. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distr'ict · No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That certain encroachment permit and hold harmless agreement dated , 1979 between One Town Center Associates and District is ----- hereby approved. Section 2: That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be and is hereby authorized and directed to record said agreement in the official records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 10th day of October, 1979. "CC" "DD" •• September 10, 1979 MEMORANDUM TO: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: In-Plant Pipe.Inspection Coast Trunk.Sewer, Reach 1 and 2 COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92 1 J (71 .C) 5.C0-2910 ~ (71 .C) 962-2.C I 1 We have received proposals from Smith-Emery Company and Osborne Laboratories, Inc. for subject work •. Proposals were requested from Inspection Consultants and Twining Laboratories but not received. Rates for the work are summarized below: Regular Charge Overtime/Saturday Sundays/Holidays Travel Time Mileage Smith-Emery $17.50/hr. $22.SO/hr. $26.50/hr. 0 0 Osborne $17.50/hr. $26.25/hr. $26.25/hr. Not Available Not Available Smith-Emery has performed satisfactorily ·on In-Plant inspection for the Knott Interceptor and based on the past performance and the above rates, r'"recommend Smith-Emery for the work. TMD:ss ~' -~ "l1z,i . tQu.,,.,f.~ f-h~~as M. Dawes Senior El).gineer I·c9ncurwith the above recommendation for Smith-Emery, t~~ per diem rates as specified in an amount not to exceed $25,000. AGE~~DA ITEM.·. #9(BB) -·~ISTRI.CT 11 "DD" : i . . I ~ . ; "EE'' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. C. '3CX 8127. F"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF"F"-RAMP, SAN DIEGO F"REEWAY) Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 October 4, 1979 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for ~onstruction Consultation Services in Connection with Construction of Coast Trunk Sewer Job No. 11-13-2 .TELEPHONES: AREA CODE ?14 540-2910 962-2411 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction consultation services in connection with the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer: Per diem rates as follow effective September 1, 1979 through June 30, 1980: Construction Manager Chief Inspector Construction Engineer Mechanical & Electrical Inspector Civil Inspector Clerical Total above fee not to exceed $25,000.00. $45.00 35.50 33.75 23.50 21.00 11.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed, and that said fee will not result in excessive profits .for the consultant. Approved /s/ Fred A. Harper · Fred A. Harper /s/ Ron Pattinson Ron Pattinson Chairman, Selection Committee General Manager . . .. . AGENDA ITEM #9Ccc) Cll··-DI.STRICT 11 "EE" RESOLUTION NO. 79-161-11 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BUTTER.ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE TUNNEL INSPECTIONS ON CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, lNC. FOR CONSTRUCTION.MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE TUNNEL INSPECTIONS ON COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACHES.I AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boardsof Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to assist staff in inspection of the five tunnels to be constructed-in connection with the Co.ast Trunk \w) Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee established pursuant to said procedures has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of.County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and ------------~---~--------- between County Sanitation District No. 11 and Butier Engineering, Inc. for construe- tion management services to assist staff with inspection of the five tunnels to be constructed in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, is hereby approved and accepted; _and, "FF-1" · · · · AGHiD.i( ITEM #9(cc) (2) -··nISTRlCT 11 "FF-1" Section 2. 111at payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. "FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #9Ccc)C2) -DISTRICT 11 . . . ~ .. .. ' ... "FF-2" RESOLUTION NO. 79-162-11 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITI1 KEITH AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF COAST TRUNK SE\~ER, REACHES 1 AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTER- CEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2, RE CONSTRUCTION STAKING SERVICES FOR SAID PROJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH KEITH AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACHES 1 AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO.-11-13-2, PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, has heretofore entered into an agreement with Keith and Associates for design of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Keith and Associates to provide for construction staking services necessary in connection with said project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of ~ounty Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 to that certain agreement dated November 10, 1976, by and between County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County and Keith and Associates~ P!oviding for construction staking services necessary in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That an increase in the payment provision for services,on a per diem fee basis, is hereby authorized from a maximum fee of $121,000 to $198,000 for said work. '~Gfr-1" _AGENDA ITEM #9(on) -···DISTRICT 11 "GG-1" '· • Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby \...,I authorized and directed to execute said addendum in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. AGEND.~ lTEM #9(no) -···DISTRICT il "GG-2" :: :I:: .::c .._. . - OPERi\TING ~­(:n·. rt1 ->· ..::-t=j· :l:::o ....... ~-rn: -• .;.:a ·-.c_ ........... ~ ·_.VJ EXPEXDITIJRES & APPR9PRIATIONS Appropriation ",for Contingencies TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS AVAILABLE FUNDING Subvent.ions Transfer From ACO Fund TOTAL:AVAILABLE Flf?l.'DING ... > j-·· ANTICIPATED TAX ALLOCATION r-~ ... t::::J ··' (:;; ACCUi-tULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY --i :.v EXPENDITURES & APPROPRIATIONS .......c·. ~ Unappropriated Reserves (/') . . :: Transfer to _Operating Funds Appropriation for District Facilities Improvements and Extensions TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS AVAILABLE FUNDING TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING A.\'TICIPATED TAX ALLOCATION ·. ~ TOTAL TAX INCREASE INCLUDING SUBVENTIONS :: ·c ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS REVISIONS TO LINE ITEMS 1979-80 FISCAL YEAR D I S T R I C T TOTAL 1 2 3 5 702,833 277,266 317,973 702,833 -0-277,266 317,973 -0- 125,212 7,945 36,826 44,954 6,123 (222"., 184) (60,093) (39,830) ( 96,972) (52,148) . 36,826 44,954 (33,i07) 799,805 52,148 240,440 273,019 33,707 I • 99,923 60,093 39,830 (222,184) (60,093) (39,830) . 122,261 -0--0--0--0--0- -0-·-0--0--o--0- -0--0--0--0--0- : 925,017 60,093 277,266 317,973 39,830 ( 6 7 11 107,594 -0-107,594 -0- 3,875 13,670 11,819 (23,654) (98,607) (19, 779) 13,670 (86,788) 19,779 93,924 86,788 oe -· .. (23,654) (98,607) .. 23,654 98,607 -0--0--0- -0--o--0- -0--0--C- ' ... 23,654 .107,594 98,607 ( ~'H" RESOLUTION NO. 79-149 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS ANU SALARIES) A JOINT·. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COuNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l~ 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby, further amended to add the following position clas~ification thereto: EXHIBIT "B-1" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Position Authorized Range Class{fication Classification Personnel ·No. 10315 Personnel Analyst 1 lOSSG Hourly 8.60/10.70 Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary 1491/1855 Section 2. That the first paragraph of Section 7 of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "The current .organizational chart of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit "C", and dated October, 1979, Revised, is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution." Section 3. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective· October 11, 1979. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979. . ·:··· AGEtJDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "II" RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR 1979-80 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT.TO ORDINANCE NO. A RESOLUTION OF Tiffi BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES FOR THE 1979-80 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use Of District Sewerage Facilities; and, WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall annually adopt a charge for use of District facilities by Class I and Class II permittees. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to Section 302.6 of Ordinance No. I the ~ . 1979-80 fiscal year charge for use for Class I permittees is hereby establfshed as fOll?WS: For Flow: $ .per million gallons of flow For Suspended Solids: $ per thousand pounds of S.S. For Biochemical Oxygen Demand: $ per thousand pounds of B.O.D. Section 2. That pursuant to Section 30Z.6.of Ordinance No. I the 1979-80 fiscal year charge for use for Class II permittees is hereby established as follows: · . For Flow: $ .per million g~llons of flow ---- "PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Octobe~ ~O, 1979 . . , ~II JJ II · .. ~.GENI':~ JTEM #15 P..LL DISTRICTS II '-1.J II ' .... . ---··-~ The Baldwin Company Cra/t:;manship in building since 19.'i6 16811 Hale Aven\,\e, Irvine, California 92714 • Telephone (714) 540-8300 September 21, 1979 Mr. Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel County Sanitation District of Orange County, California c/o Rourke & Woodruff 1055 North Main Street Santa Ana, California Subject: Proposed Annexation No. 82 -Tract No~ .9606 to County Sanitation District No. 7 Dear Mr. Woodruff: Confirming our September 20, 1979 telephone request and my conversation with Mr. Ray Lewis, this is an officiaL request on behalf of The Baldwin Company for permission to enter into a def erred payment agreement for the Annexation No. 82 acreage fees; and, for a conditional reimbursement agreement for the "island parcels" within the Tract 9606 boundaries.. The requested deferral · date on acreage fees is June 30, 1980. The Baldwin Company further request that it be reimbursed for fees paid for the island parcels not within its ownership if, within five (5) years, owners of these properties pay acreage fees and connect to District facilities. The Board of Directors of District No. 7 authorized initiation of proceedings in connection with this annexation on May 9, 1979. ·Proceedings have been held in abeyance pending receipt of the required fees. Because of un- anticipated delays in the recording of the first planned.final tract maps, loan proceeds allocated to the acreage fee payments are not yet available. We understand that as a concession for allowing the annexation proceedings to continue, an interest bearing note may be required by the District. An up- dated title report and legal description for the property will be delivered to you from First American by September 25, 1979. We would appreciate your earliest attention to this request so that agreements might be presented to the Board at the October 10, 1979 meeting. Yours very truly, Philip Bettencourt Consultant to The Baldwin Company cc: Mr. J. Wayne SY-lvester\~ Nr. Ray Lewis ) v; Io attachments ~.· Mr. Jim Baldwin·:.·~··. ·).·~: ... '.': . "KK" . ·.·AGENDA ITEM #29(A) ~DISTRICT 7· "KK" '~M~·1-l" RESOLUTION NO. 79-160-7 APPROViNG AGREEMENT WITH BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR DEFEHMl:.NT OF ANNEXATION FEES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF. DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR THE DEFERMENT OF ANNEXATION FEES WHEREAS, the District has by Resolution No. 79-63-7, adopted May 9, 1979, approved the initiation of annexation proceedings for 156.9 acres of uninhabited territory; and, WHEREAS, in connection with said annexation proceedings, Baldwin Builders as the owner/developer, has requested a deferral of the payment of the annexation fees until June 30, 1980; and, WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of said deferral of fees, the Baldwin Builders as owner/developer, has agreed.to execute a promissory note secured by . deed of trust on the subject property, which prop~rty is generally described as· Tentative Tract No. 9606, located in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and . . Newport Boulevard, in the County of Orange; and, · WHEREAS, in conjunction with this annexation, three separate parcels of property are s~own on the Tentative Tract 9606 as be "NOT A PART" thereof, but which parcels are required to be included .within th~ annex~tion to the District; and, WHEREAS, Baldwin Builders as owner/developer, has agreed to pay the a~nexation fees for each of the three properties not included within the legal description of Tentative Tract No. 9606, together with the annextion fees for Lot No. 199, which is owned by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, subject to an agreement by District to reimburse the developer for fees advanced on said i~GE;.J!J/\ ITEM #-29 < c) ~ .. DI ST~ I CT 7 . : . . . . "t~~~1-l" parcels in the event said properties subsequently connect to the District's sys~em. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District .No. 7 of Orange County, California, "MM-2" DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That certain agreement between Baldwin Builders, a California corporation, and County Sanitation District No. 7, providin_g for the payment of annexation fees, deferral thereof, and reimbursement for certain portions of said fees is hereby approved. Section 2: The Chairman and Secretary. of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself in a form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 10th day of October, 1979. , "MM-2" ( su~~'-'.ARY OF THE GANN INITIATIVE--PROPOSITiON 4 PROPOSED ARTJ.GLE XIII-B CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION The Limitations [Sec. l] The total annual ap- propriations of the state or any entity of local governmant ·shall. not exceed the appropriations · - limit of the prior year. subject to adjustments for CQSt of living and population and as provided in Sect ion 3. The Interpretation [Sec. 3) (c) The appropriations limit may be exceeded ln an 11 emergency provided that the excess appropriation for any year is offset by reducing appropriations limits in the following three years. [Sec. 5) (sentences 2 and 3) Withdrawals from or interfund transfers between the funds permitted by Section 5, are not appropriations sub- ject to limitation. but contributions from proceeds of taxes are appropriations subject to limitation. [Sec. 6J The state may, but need not provide a new subvention to local government for(') the cost of mandates requested by the local agency, (11 ) costs related to definition or redefinition of crimes, or(''') mandates enacted before 1975 or to implement legislation enacted before 1975. S~ction S(a) and 8(b} clarify that any of these new subventions, if given, will count as part of the state !P.l!!.Qpriations subject to limitation, but not as·part of the local !21!!£1!riations subject to limi· tat ion .. ( ~-~.{ ,. I The Implcmentatio.n [Sec. 11] This Article will become effective July 1, 1980. [Sec. 2] Revenues received in ex- cess of appropriations permitted by this Article shall be returned through revisions of tax rates or fee sched- ule within th~ two following fiscal years. [Sec. 8] (h) For 1978/79 the !2: propriations limit shall be the total of the appropriations su~­ ject to 1 imitation for 19787~ ~this makes 1978/19 the bench mark for measuring subsequent changes in appropriations). All state sub· ventions for 1978/79 are deemed lo have been derived from proceeds of 'I ) ... [Sec. 3] specifies adjustments: (a) if government entities trans· fer financfal responsibility they shall agree on a corresponding transfer of a" ro riations limit, (b 1 ) if the transfer 15 to a pr - vate entity. the appropriations limit shall be lower "accordingl~." and Cb'') if there is a change in the source of revenue from which government services are pro- vided, so as to use license or [Sec. 7) This Article is not to imeair the ability of state or local government to "meet its obligations' toward bonded indebtedness. !!.ill· user fees instead of other reve· nues. the appropriations limit shall be lowered "accordingly." [Sec. 4J Appropriations limit may be set for any new govern- ment entity or changed for any existing entity by vote of tho el~ctors. The vote is effective for not more than four years. (Sec. 5] Each entity may estab- lish contingency. unemployment. reserve, retirement. sinking fund, trust or similar funds it deems 11 r:?asonable.11 [Sec. 6) If the state mandates a new program or higher level of service by local government, it shall provide a new subvention of funds to reimburse ih~ costs. [Sec. 8] (a) State appropriations subject to limitation mean any authori- zation to expend during a fiscal year the state proceeds of taxes except for the purposes of(') present subventions to local government, (1 ') tax refunds, and(''') payments from retirement, unemployment. and disability insurance funds. (b) Local appropriations subject to limitation·mean any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the local procoeds of taxes and present state subventions, excepting only refunds of taxes. (c) Proceeds of taxes means all tax revenues; all proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges, and user fees in excess of the 11 costs reasonably borne 11 by the re· ceiving entity is providing the regulation. product or service; and proceeds from the investment of tax revenues. · [Sec. 9J A ro riations sub'ect to limitation do not include (a) debt service. (b appropriations essential to comply with court and federal mandate~, (c') appropriations of any special district whose ad valorem tax levy in 1977/78 did not exceed $0.125/$100A.V.1 and (11 ) appropria· tions ~f any special district which is totally tunded by other than the proceeds of taxes. [Sec. OJ (g) Debt service means interest and redemption charges. including required reserve and sinking fund deposits. on indebtedness existing or legally authorized as of January 1 1 1979, or on bonded indebtedness subse- quently voted by the electors. [Sec. SJ (e) Cost of living means the CPI, U.S. Dept. of Labor. but the yea·r-to-year increase in cost of. 1iving shall not exceed tho change in California par c~pita person~l inc~me •. Prepared August 1979 by BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES Municipal Financing Consultants 100 Bush Street San franc1sco, California 94104 .. , . . . . -· . "-" .. THE GANN INITIATIVE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ·. By Raymond K. O'Neil, Vice President Bartle Wells Associates I Municipal Financing Consultants San Francisco Prepared for California Association of Sanitation Agencies Annual Work Conference August 24, 1979 ' . On Nov~mber 6, 1979, Californians who go to the polls will vote on "Proposition 4, Limitation of Government Appropriations." That is the official ballot title for the Gann Initiative which was successfully cir- culated by a group calling itself the "Spirit of 13_, Inc." Between now and November there will be a lot of publicity on Proposi- tion 4. Its proponents will promote Proposition 4 as a logical and nec- essar~y complement to Proposition 13 which passed 17 months· earlier. Proposition 13 restricts the inflow of revenues from property taxes; Proposition 4 restricts the outflow of government funds through the ·ap- propriation process. Note that alt~"i.ough the two propositions are spiritually related, they · .. function very differently. Proposition 13 assaults government spendin;;r from the rear, by cutting one supply route--property taxes. It offered an immediate and large bonanza to those voters who happened to own property, but it did not reduce other forms of taxation. Proposition 4 assaults government spending from the front by restricting its rate of advance. It offers no bonanza, and restricts taxation only indirectly through the budgetary process of matching income to a restricted amount of expenditures. · · The spiritual semblance can be seen, however~ in several ways. Neither proposition attempts to as~mre a continuity of public service; neither leaves much legislative discretion in ~atching the level of service to social . needs or turns of the economy; neither places any importance on renewing and replacing public facilities for .the benefit of ·future genera- tions. They are united in being anti-government and anti-tomorrow. But these philosoplical attitudes are not the focus of this paper. Nor do I want to r.pecnlate on whether or not Proposition 4· will. pass. Rather I want to focus on how Proposition 4, if passed, would affect those re- sponsible for serving the publ~c; That's not an easy .job . "f' • 1 Each person who rccids the ·proposition will read it throufJh his own eyes--some as disgruntled taxpayers, son:ie more silently as satisfied taxpayers, some ns accountants, some as administrators, some seedy types as consultants, and all too many as lawyers. Each will have his mm interpretation, his own emphasis. Most, however, will not read through the proposition at all, and will be spared the risk of guessing at its meaning. To make it a Ii ttle more readable, I've dissected it into three parts, something like a bug. o It has a head and a tail, and that's all most people will s~e. The head of Proposition 4 is made up of limitations, prominently placed up front in Sections 1, 3, 4, and 5. It appears friendly enough. Appropriations are to be limited, but they can be increased with population and the cost of living. P~ople can vote additional ap- propriations. Reasonable. funds can be set up for contingencies and emergencies. · o It's tail is also prominent. Section 11 at the end gives an effective date, and Section 2 is a highly visible reference to returning ex- cessive revenues. These are implementation clauses. o Proposition 4 also has a middle section which is very large in size, hut easy to ignore because it is obtusely written and disorganized. However, this .is the interpretative· section, which gives meaning to the limitation. · · _ . As you can see from the attached exhibit, our bug has a small head, a smaller tail, and a very large middle. The guts, pardon the expres- sion, are in the middle, not in the head. If you look at the exhibit you \-vill see that I've underlined nvo key terms which recur again and again: 11 appropriations limit" (or t:appro- priations subject to limitation") and uproceeds of taxes. n These terms are the soul of the initiative. They are defined along with a number of other terms in Section 8 and 9, part of the large middle section which few readers will even scan. I hope you ·will not be among thos~ whose attention wanders somewhere around the middle of Section 5 .. If you read on, thoughtfully, you will begin to see questions and seek answers like the one's I'm going to present in the middle section of this paper, starting now. How is the appropriations limit determined? In common usage an ap- propriation is the act of setting apart, or assigning to a ·particular use or person, in exclusion of al! others; as of money to carry out some public object. (Webster's quoted in 80 Cul 220.) Words in a constitutional amendment should be given their natural and ordinnry meaning (35 Cal App 3d 473). However, apparent ambi~Juities may be resolved by· contcmperaneous construction of the Legislature· (20 Cal 3d 765). In addition the ballot nrguments and nnalysis presented to the electorate may be helpful in resolving uncertain language (33 Cal 2d 564). . , . 2 J • ·~- . \...,,) Except for the first citation, all of these references nrc from the state Supreme Court's recent review of Proposition 13. They suggest that the court is not bound by any "accounting" definition, or by previous legislation in giving meaning to the word "appropriations." · Nevertheless, I am reluctant to ignore the meaning of appropriations . as found in the present Government Code. The Supreme. Court may adopt this meaning as "ordinary" or the Legislature may a~t to impute to Proposition 4 the definitions already codified. The Government Code generally requires local agencies, including cities and special districts, to adopt and file an annual budget by August 30 (Section 53901). The act of adopting the budget becomes on act of appropriation (Section 29092). The individual totals for the budget items become the appropriations. In this usage an appropriation is an estimate of annual expenditures (on either a cash or accrual basis) together with obligations to be in- curred (Section 39001, 39001.5). Appropriations not expended or en- cumbered within the fiscal year lapse and revert to the fund balance available for later appropriation (Section 29143). However, Proposition· 4 does not limit individual appropriations or even the aggregate amount of all appropriations. It limits only the total of appropriations funded by "proceeds of taxes, 11 which it defines in Sec- tion 8( c), and by present state "subventions," which it does not define. To find your appropriations limit you will have to revielv your year-end financial statement for 1978/79. Your appropriations limit for that year appears to be the sum of the following: · 1. Your total proceeds from taxes of all kinds, less any taxes collected specifically for debt service as defined in Section 8(g). · 2. Your total revenue from regulatory licenses and service fees less all charges allocated as a cost of providing ·the regulation or service. 3. Your total revenue from the state as grants, aid, and subsidies of all kinds . This formulu assumes that any of the above revenues not actualiy spent in 1978/79 were either encumbered Or' transferred by appropriation to . a con ting ency fund. If they were carried forward as an addition to a general fund or enterprise fund balance, the ~ppropriations limit has to be reduced by the amount carried forward. · If your accounting system wasn 1t sophisticated enough to identify the cost of providing regulations for which you collected a license fee, or the cost of service for which you collected user charges or user fees, you have two problems·. One, you have to go back and make a reason- able reallocation of your 1978/79 costs so you can find your appropria- tions limit for that year. Two, you have to revise your accounting systems to allocate all costs properly chargeable to regulations and services, and to document that allocation. · · 3 :.'. In this respect, single purpose spedal districts have an advantage. All their costs are allocable to sewerage or water service as the case may be. Multipurpose districts, counties, and cities have a more dif-\wJ ficult burden. They hnve to allocate general and administrative costs among different activities and services• !\Jany I if not most I have never allocated all such costs among their operating depurtments or enterprise funds. Under Proposition 4 they can no longer afford not to charge a full overhead burden agninst services and regulatory functions for which a fee is charged. Isn't there an element of chance in finding the a2_propriations limit? Yes, there are two ways in which chance may play ·a role. First, by picking a particular base year, Proporition 4 makes the events of that year, 1978/79, more decisive than they may have seemed. For example, if you received a state "subvention 11 for 1978/79, and spent or encum- bered it, your appropriation limit is higher b:y that amount than it would have been without the '·'subvention. 11 Since Proposition 4 ·doesn't tell us what a subvention is, we are left to the general rules of construction which I cited earlier. The natural and ordinary meaning of subvention as. given by Webster's (3rd New International) is a subsidy from a government. A subsidy is ·further· defined as a grant of funds or property to assist in the establishment or support of an enterprise deemed advantageous to the public. The State Attorney General has defined subvention as a paymerit by which one entity of government subsidizes a service provided by another entity of government. . ~· I see nothing in these definitions ·which requires a narrow interpretation of the word subvention so as to restrict it to operating aid. I believe that the state funded portion of any clean water grant is a state sub- vention. If you happened to get one in 1978/79, you are a winner in the game of Constitutional Keno. · The second element of chance in finding your appropriations limit is an element of risk. Your allocation of costs, in determining the cost · of service, is subject to challenge. Ho·wever, ·I do not believe that your exposure is a serious one. Proposition 4 allows you to deduct all "costs reasonably borne" in pro- viding the regulation, product or service. That language invites your exercise of professional judgment. Unless that judgment is so conspic- uously abused as to be crbitrary and capricious, it will with stand court challenge. The real risks are the costly nuisances of (a) having to memorialize every allocation in sufficient detail that you can recall it, and (b) of having to respond to legal harassment if someone doesn't like your judgment. How are capital costs trentccl und£?:r Proposition 11? ·There appear to · beilirceclT:fforent answers depending on the source of funds. 1. 1f the project is reasonnbly necessary to the provision of a service or regulatory function for which foes are collected, the fees can 4 . ....,,_; be set to puy the capital coHt and can be used for tlrnt purpose. The only limitation on the use of fees is thnt they he used to pay "costs reasonably borne" in providing· the regulation, product or ~ervice . . In the exhibit· you will find this language nnd several similarly vague terms set off by quotation marks. This kind of vague lan- guage is permitted in c·onstitutional provisions even though similar language might invalidate a penal law. By nature constitutions paint with broad strokes and leave room for interpretation. . . ·I've already discussed the latitude in the work "reasonable·,." so I'll turn now to the word "costs." Certainly in ordinnry usage costs include capital· as well as operating costs. If I asked a sales- man how much a car costs, he might point to the sticker price, or say so much a month, or talk about gasoline mileage. In any of these senses--capital cost, loan amortization, or O&ivl we would · be talking about cost. Nothing in Proposition 4 itself says that it means one kind of cost but not another. I conclude, therefore, that you can charge off anainst fee income any ldnd of cost related to the production of that income, at least on a pay-as-you-go basis. I'll talk later about debt financing. The difficulty with pay-as-you-go financing· for large long-lived projects is that it puts all _the _capital cost of future use _on present users. It discourages building for tomorrow. 2. If the source of capital is current revenue but not fees related to the project, then the project has to be financed within your appro- priations limit. (I'm again pussing over the option of debt financ- ing.) If your appropriations in 1978/79 includf!d a capital outlay from -proceeds of taxes, state grants or net utility revenues, you may have some headroom to make further capital appropriations. However, if ·you had prudently built up a capital outlay fund and withdrawn from it in 1978/79, the amount withdrmvn wns not an 11 appropriation subject to limitation." You have been too conser- vative to win at Constitutional Keno. 3. If you intend to pay for a project from a reserve or capital outlay fund you may do so. However, if you wish to replenish the fund from taxes, state grants or net utility revenues, you will have .to . fund the replenishment from within your appropriations limit. Section 5 does permit you to replenish the fund from utility reve- nues or regulatory fees to the extent that the project' is chargeable as a cost of the regulation, product, or service. In other ·words you can replenish reserves used to finance the capital cost of serv- ices Jor which you bill. But if you are a city you could ill afford to deplete reserves to build a police or fire station; nor could you as a county easily replenish funds used to build a jail or a juvenile hall . ,. . . 5 How docs P~~pos~~!.9_i:i_~ affecLth~ issmmcc of bond~? Here a~rain ~here appear to Ee severnl answers aepending ontfic type o.f bond and its ... . ,. time of authorization. I will start with the subject of bonds outstanding ~ as ~f January 1, 1979. 1. Proposition 4 is not to impair any government entity from ,.meeting its obligntions" with respect to bonded indebtedness.· That is es- sentially an assurance that general obligntion and revenue borids, voted or unvoted, but authorized by January 1 will be paid. Money raised to pay debt service on these issues is outside the appropria- tions limit. Arguably any net utility revenue raised to supply "coverage" under the terms of a revenue bond issue is also outside the appropriations limit even if it exceeds the "cost11 of s·ervice. This is a point which the Legislature could clarify if Proposition 4 passes. Historically the impairment of con tract clause of the Federal Constitution has protected revenue covenants. Payments on lease revenue bonds are a different matter. Generally they are not debt service under California law. They are rent paid for facilities, that is, an operating cost payable under a long- term agreement. Under Proposition 4 such payments ·would be qutside the appropriations limit only to the extent that the rental is charge- able to a fee supported regulation, product, or service and paid from the fees collected. If all or part of the rent relates to non-fee activities, Proposition 4 requires that pnrt of the rent to be paid from within the appropriations lL'nit. Proposition 4 like Proposition 13 certainly weakens the security behind lease revenue bonds for non- fce facilities, but it doesn't destroy the obligation to pay the bonds. 2. Let me now talk about new bond issues, those. authorized after ·January 1, 1979. Proposition '1 specifically protects bond service on vote:l bonds. That is, bond service on voted bonds falls out- side 1J1e appropriations limit. But Proposition 4 does not prohibit nonvoted bonds. Two exa.i"'11ples of· non voted bonds are bonds issued under the 1933 Sewer Revenue Bond Act and certain 1941 Law Revenue Bonds issued by joint powers sewerage agencies acting under a cease-and desist order. Both of these forms of nonvotcd bonds are enterprise bonds payable from utility revenues. They are payable solely from fees for a product or service. Debt payment on these bonds appears to be a cost of service, ~nd therefore not subject to the appropria- tion limit. In summary, Proposition 4 doesn't seem to affect revenue 'bonds, old or new, whether voted or not. It does not say they are not ·bonded indebtedness. It does not say they may not be issued. It docs not say they Ct:mnot be paid from foes for a product or service. Common usage would illlow repayment of borrowed money as a "cost reasonably borne" in providing a product or service. There is nothing in the word "cost" which implies that you cnn charge off only depreciation, bond principal, or some amount less thnn bond service. If the authors hncl in.tended to define cost to exclude bond service they could easily have done so. · 6 .. With r~spect to lease revenue bonds also, the situation for new issues is the same as for old issues. ·They are not bonded indebtednc~s. Rent not related to foe activities has to be paid from v;ithin the appro- pria~ions limit. Hent related to fee activities can be pnid from fees and charged as a cost of the product or service. Q~n't yo*_!.hl!1k of _any_.Qthc!:_ ri_.Q.j_culou:_;_~om_R1ic~!_ion? Sure. How about the rate et-down effect? Under Proposition 4 if you don't appropriate to your limit in any given year, you loose that much of yor limit for good. Your limit ratchets down. You can protect yourself by making sure that all tax revenues·, net utility revenues I or state urants are clearly spent, -encumbered I or appropriated to contingency or reserve funds each year. Don't let appropriations lapse because contracts are not ready for award. What ha2pens if_g_~~_gr~_? reduces or eliminates Revenue Sh~ring? . This question is potentially of great importance to the state, counties, and cities. The nnswer is that services funded from revenue sharing generally cannot be funded from new state or local taxes under Propo- sition 4. Federal subventions are not appropriations subject to limita- tion. They do not raise the ceiling on. expenditures which may be made from state or local proceeds of taxes. Can fees for wa_t~~r, sew~I1 garbage collection, and otha1· servic~e raised under Prop9~itio~_i? Yes., ~net revenues in excess of the cost of service will be treated as tax proce.eds. If they and other tax proceeds exceed the appropriations limit, the amount of excess has to be returned within the two follmving fiscal years. The excess does not have to be returned in the form it was earned. Utility 11 profits" can be put into the general fund to reduce property taxes, for example. On this point, however, you will want to watch SB 131 and SB 246, which limit the amount of "profitu or ·constrain its use. The practical· problem is that you \vill want to clearly relate rate increases to cost increases. For example, escalating connect.i.on charges should be tied to debt repayment or cost indices. Other rate increases should be documented by well detailed estimates of prospective revenue und expenditures. This all means more money to provide the same services. Are there other hidden costs in Proposition 4? Yes. For your own protection you shot\fd document your-compffance with Proposition 4 as part of each year's financial statement. This means that for every regulatory or service function, for which fees are charged, there should be a statement of :f ecs received versus costs incurred. Any excess oJ fees over costs should then be added to tax receipts, earnings on tnx receiptn, and state subventions. Finally you should compare these revenue totals to your appropriations limit for the year. · You cun probnbly complete this reconciliation four to six months into .-..,,,; the suc~ecding fiscnl year, and adjust tux :rates or fee schedules for ., .. 7 the second following year. If Proposition 4 passes·, the Legislature may tell the State Controller to send you. some regulations on this sub- ject. Is Pro~os~tio~actic~l a~ministrative}y? In most respec~s, yes. 1 TI"ue, it is wfia1:1hc state Supreme Court has called "a legislative batter- ing ram used to tear through the exasperating tangle of trndit.ional legislative procedure." It is a crude instrument for delicate work. It also leaves much· room for interpretation and legal argument~. Look again at the number of vague terms hi{Jhligh ted on the exhibit. I ·As I've noted a couple of times, Proposition 4 is also ovcrzealo.us.. In Hs thrust to curtail expansion of government service, it adds consid- ~rably to the cost and burden of continuing services which are indis- putably necessary·. . . In addition there are two areas which virtually defy administration as the Proposition now stands. o First is the subvention issue. Do subventions mean all subsidies from the state, or just operating subsidies? Does the term "sub- vention" refer to the services subvented or· to the dollars paid? If the reference is· to dollars paid, does the reference apply sep- arately to each program or only to the gross amount of subventions for programs in effect at the time referred to? · - . .... o Second is the interest-on-investments problem·. Revenues from · V the investment of tax revenues are defined as "proceeds of taxes; 11 . · they have to be accounted for in determining whether proceeds of taxes exceeded the appropriation limit. But tax revenues have not generally been segregated for investment. Under Proposition 4 they must at least be· accounted for separately. When does a tax revenue cease to be a tax revenue? If it is transferred to a reserve fund or rctireme.nt fund, does it have to be tracked indefinitely, so that its investment earnings are stated separately from earnings on funds transferred as a cost of service? What is the starting point? Do we assume that some, all, or none of the existing fund balances cnme from tax revenues? Although I've already offered a lot of opinions, and a few guesses, I won't offer my guesses on these issues. All the evidence isn 1t in yet. As we saw with Proposition 13, the Supreme Court will look not only at the words of Proposition 4, if it passes and is challenged, but also at the official ballot arguments, campaign literature, and espe~ially at any fallow-up legislation. I expect thn.t the Leuislature ·would try to clarify the meanings of "subvention" and "proceeds from investment, 11 nnd possibly address other points I've tried to cover. I won't specu- late on what the Legislature will say, or whether its action vmuld make matters better or worse. · Before concluding I want to nddress one other qucs tion. ... a t I .... Are ~l?.cci.~LJ!j~tr!_~~s cxem2.~. fr~m P~ .. 0205-U.~m~-. .L~Y...!£~1~12_of S_c:f_~~2!~~? No, w1fl1 few exceptions. Section 9 states. Lwo exceptions, and tficy are both illusory . One excepts from limitation any special district whose ad vulorcm tax levy in 1977 /78 did not exceed 12. s· cents per $100. This means your tax levy before Proposition 13 for all purposes: debt, operations, · and reserves. Few districts qualify, and even fewer if improvement district tax levies have to be considered. The second exception is for any special district totally funded by other than proceeds of taxes. Notice two points: (a) proceeds of ·~axes include state grants or other subven~ions and investment earnings on tax revenues. (b) No year is stated for determining whether a special district is exempt. It has to pass the test every year. If it accepts a clean water grant under the present program (i.e. not a new program or a higher level of service under Sectiori 6), it is back in the appro- priations harness. If some of its investn)ent earnings are attributed to tax revenues, even those received years ago and used to build up reserves, it is back in harness. · In summarizing I won't retrace my steps through this paper. I will just add two points--a petulant complaint, a·nd a I?rec~utionary note. I am ill-tempered enough to resent the deceitful arrangement of Propo- sition 4, even thoug·h I realize that the initiative game is often played that wa-y. What you think you see when you look at the head and . tail is not what you get in the middle. And as you can see from this paper, the middle is pretty ~ard to decipher. I must also caution you not to believe v;hat I have said either. My opinions are sincere, but not incontestable. Were there not room for differences of opinion, there would be wholesale unemployment among la\vyers. · Furthermore, Proposition 4 has not yet passed. If offers no bonanzas to anyone who votes for it. It will hurt those who need new or better services from government. It ignores the needs of future generations. It leaves little flexibility to respond to rcccssi.on or disaster. It will continue to drive dedicated and qualified managers out of governmant service. · You can't even tell from Proposition-4 how much government will cost. All you can be sure of it that more of the costs would he paid through service fees, and that the public would get more administration and less service for its money. . .. 9 EXCERPTS FROM THE MIN UTES OF THE REGU LAR JO I NT MEETI NG OF THE BOARDS or DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SAN ITATIO N DISTRI CT S NOS. 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6 , 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COU NTY, CALIFORN I A A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Or ange County, California , was held at the h our of 7:30 p.m., September 12 , 19 79, 10 84 4 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Or ganization called the meeting to order at 7: 30 p .m. Th~ roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present . * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Amending previous Board action approving Adde ndum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Treatment Plant Facilities Plan as follows: * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board action of May 9, 19 79, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engineers re separate Treatment Plant Facilities Pl ans for Flow Equa lization Project, be, and is hereby, amended to read "That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 79-58, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engine e rs re Treatment Plant Facilities Plan, providing for preparation of separate Facilities Plan for the Flow Equali z ation Project, on a per diem fe e basis, increasing the maxi- imum amou nt for the Treatment Plant Facilities Plan from $100,000 to $125,000, be, and is hereby, approved . A certified copy of this resolution is attached here to and made a part of these minutes." STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of th e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and corre ct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 1 2th day of September , 19 79 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto d y? of September 1979 S-107 EXCERPT S FRml THE mNUTES OF THE REGU LAR JOINT MEETIN G OF THE BOARDS or DIRECTO RS OF COUNTY SANITAT I ON DI STRICTS NOS . 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6 , 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COU NTY , CALIFORN I A A re gu lar joint meeting of th e Boards of Directors of County Sanit ation Districts Nos . 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California , was he l d at th e hour of 7 :30 p .m., September 12 , 1979 , 10 844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley , Ca lifornia. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Or ganization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was ca lled and the Secretary reported a quorum present . * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to engage Delphi Systems for computer programming changes to comp l y with new OCERS retirement plan Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the s t aff be, and i s he reby, auth- orized to engage Delphi Systems, Inc . for computer programming changes to comply with new Or ange County Emplo yees Retiremen t System (OCERS) change diem fee basis to a dual retirement pl a n effective September 21, 1979, on a per for a total amount not to exceed $5,000 . STATE OF CA LIFO RNIA) ) SS . COU NTY OF OR ANGE ) I, J . WAY NE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boa rds of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7 , and 11, of Or a nge County, Ca l ifornia, do hereb y certify th a t the above and for ego ing to be full, true an d correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boa rds of Directors on the 12th day of September , 19 79 . I N WIT NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 19 79 Nos . S-107 10-10-79 REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN THE STAFF HAS BEEN QUITE BUSY SECURING CONSTRUCTION GRANTS AND HAVE RECEIVED, SINCE THE LAST BOARD MEETING, $23,450,000 IN GRANTS FOR DIGESTION FACILITIES, ALONG WITH THE DEWATERING FACILITIES RE- QUIRED AT PLANT NO, 2. THE DISTRICTS WILL ALSO RECEIVE APPROXIMATELY $9,3 MILLION NEXT WEEK FOR THE SLUDGE TRANSPORT FACILITIES, WHICH INCLUDE TRUCKS, TRAILERS AND EQUIPMENT TO PROCESS SLUDGE AT THE COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL SITE AS WELL AS APPROXIMATELY $8,2 MILLION OF CON- STRUCTION GRANT FUNDS FOR DISTRICT #11 TO CONSTRUCT THE COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK, WE ARE ALSO HAPPY TO REPORT THAT THE WAIVER APPLICATION FOR 1,.,,_1 MODIFICATIONS OF SECONDARY TREATMENT AS REPORTED AT THE LAST MEETING WAS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 13, WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED BY EPA. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,, . . . WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31, INVITE ~ OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: ----...... HAROLD SE~ ~ST~ CHARLES SYLVIA LOUIS VELASQUEZ 10-10-79 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN THE STAFF HAS BEEN QUITE BUSY SECURING CONSTRUCTION GRANTS AND HAVE RECEIVED1 SINCE THE LAST BOARD MEETING1 $231450 1000 IN GRANTS FOR DIGESTION FACILITIES, ALONG WITH THE DEWATERING FACILITIES RE- QUIRED AT PLANT NO, 2, THE DISTRICTS WILL ALSO RECEIVE APPROXIMATELY $9,3 MILLION NEXT WEEK FOR THE SLUDGE TRANSPORT FACILITIES1 WHICH INCLUDE TRUCKS1 TRAILERS AND EQUIPMENT TO PROCESS SLUDGE AT THE COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL SITE AS WELL AS APPROXIMATELY $8,2 MILLION OF CON- STRUCTION GRANT FUNDS FOR DISTRICT #11 TO CONSTRUCT THE COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK, WE ARE ALSO HAPPY TO REPORT THAT THE WAIVER APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATIONS OF SECONDARY TREATMENT AS REPORTED AT THE LAST MEETING WAS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 13 1 WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED BY EPA. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,1 . . WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: HAROLD SEITZ DONALD STRAUSS CHARLES SYLVIA LOUIS VELASQUEZ MEETING DATE October lO, 1979 TIME 7:30 p.m. DJST~ICTS l,2,3,5,6,7&11 DISTRICT 1 ~SCHUSTER). • • • • SHARP • • • • • • • ~ YAMAMOTO). • • • • WARD • •••• • • • ~ ---- RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY ••• ~ •• ~======== CRANK) •• • • • • • • HUTCH I SON·· • • ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 2 FR I ED) •••• • • • • WEDAA • • • • • • • V' RASHFORO ). • • • • HOLT· • ••• • •• •. V"'° ==== ==== GAMB I NA) •••••• FOX • • • • • • • • • .,,-___ _ WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON...... '-"' ANTHONY).····. MILLER ••••••• ~ ---- CULVER) ••••••• PERRY········~ ==== ==== GRAHAM) ••••••• ~ee~T········~ SEYMOUR).····. ROTH • •••••• • ...JL. ---- HOYT) •••••••• SMITH· ••••••• __aL" ---- SVALSTAD) ••••• STANTON ••••• ·~ ---- WINT~RS) •••••• VELASQUEZ····~======== WARD) •••• ••••• YAMAMOTO •• • ·~ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 . NYBORG) ••••••• FRESE •••••••• ~ EVANS)········ ROWAN········~ ---- SVALSTAD) ·····ADLER········ .....,..... ----MACAL~I STER)· ·BAI LEY·······~======== PERRY)······· ·CULVER·······~ COLLACOTT) ····FINLAYSON····~ ---- CORBETT)······ 8RAllAM· •• • •• ·-i,L ---- GAMBINA) • • • • • • LEt·BARON • • • • ·-i,L ---- GRIFFIN)····· ·.REESE· ••••• ··~ ---- SEYMOUR)······ ROTH····.···· ..,_....... ---- LASZLO)· • • • • ··SEITZ. • • • • • • • .,_..,.. ---- OMMI CK.~ •••••• SYLVIA· •• ····~======== WHEELER •••••• WEISHAUPT •••• ~ ANTHONY •••••• WIEDER •••••• -~ ---- VELASQUEZ). ••• WINTERS ••••• -~ ---- WARD). •••• ~ ••• YAMAMOTO •••• ·~==== ==== DISTRICT 5 ~HUMMEL)\ •••••• RYCKOFF •••••• ~ RYCKOFF J ••• ··.STRAUSS •••• ··~-.--- ANTHONY) •••••• RI LEY········~==== DISTRICT 6 ~RYCKO~F) •• ····MC INNIS····· ~ CRANK ••••• • •• HUTCH I SON·.·-~==== ==== RILEY •••••• ·-ANTHONY.: •••• ·~--__ DISTRICT 7 HOYT) • • • • • • • ·SMITH· • • • • • • • V"' RYCKOFf)······WILLIAMS····· ........... ==== ==== WAHNER} t ••••• '!'*-:eel<NER ••••• ~ ---- ANTHONY). ... I • Ml LLER ~ ••••• t ~ ---- s ILLS)· • • • •• • • VARDOULI S •••• ~ ___ _ YAMAKOTo). ····WARD •••••••• ;~ ___ _ SCHUSTER)····· WELSH .••••••• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 11 (MACALLJSTER) •• PATTINSON •••• .,,....- (MAND IC) ••••••• MA CALLI STER •• ---,;;7"' ---- (ANTHONY) •••••• WI EDER. • • • • • • ),/' ==== ==== JOINT BOARDS (SVALSTAD)·····ADLER······ .,,,,, (RILEY)······· ·ANTHONY····~ --MACAL~I~TER)· ·BAILEY·····~==== PERRY)········CULVER·····--.;;;;' COLLACOTT) .. ···FINLAYSON··~ -- GAMB I NA)· • • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • ·~ ==== NYBORG)·······FRESE······~ WAHNER)······ ·€kQSIHliR • ·~ __ CORBETT)····· ·eRAllAfl • • • ·~ RASHFORD) ·····HOLT······· ..,.--- WELLS)······· ·HOUSTON··· ·--J£: ====· CRANK)········HUTCHISON··~ GAMBINA) ······LE BARON···~ MANDIC)···~···MACALLISTER~--- RYCl<OFF) ······MC INNIS···~ __ _ ANTHONY)· .• •·· ·MILLER···· .=.z-__ _ MACALLISTER)·· PATTINSON·· .__.....--· CULVER)······· PERRY······~ -- GR'I FF IN)· • • • • ·REESE· • • • • • ~ ==== ANTHONY)····~·RILEY······~ . GRAHAM) • • • • • • • ~e~'r • • • • • • --JL_ ==== SEYMOUR)······ROTH·······~ EVANS)········ ROWAN······~ -- HUMMEL)······· RYCKOFF • • • • l/"° ==== .LASZLO)······· SElTZ· • • • • ·~ SCHUSTER)·····SHARP······__JL ==== HOYT) • • • • • • • • • SM lTH • • • • • • ~ SVALSTAO) ·····STANTON····~==== RYCKOFF)······STRAUSS····~ ZOMMI CK)· • • • • ·SYLVIA· • • • • ~-­ SILLS}······· ·VARDOULIS· -~-­ WINTERs) •••••• vELASQUEZ· ·~==== YAMAMOTO)·····WARD·······~ FRIED)······· ·WEDAA· • • • • ·~ -- SHEELER)····· ·WEISHAUPT··~==== SCHUSTER)· • • ·~WELSH· • • • • • ,,,,,,--__ ANTHONY) •••••• WI EDER. • • • • a----__ RYCKOFF)· ·····WILLIAMS···~ __ VElASQUEz) •••• WINTERS •••• ~ WARD) ••••••••• YAMAMOTO •• -~==== OTHERS HARPER ••••• ___ _ SYLVESTER·· ___ _ LEWIS •••••• ___ _ CLARKE • • • • • ___ _ BROWN •••• •• ___ _ WOODRUFF • • • ___ _ HOHENER • • • • ___ _ HOWARD • • • • • ___ _ HUNT-· •••••• ___ _ KEITH •••••• ___ _ KENNEY •••• • _· __ _ LYNCH •••••• ___ _ MADDOX •••• • __ __ MARTINSON •• ___ _ PIERSALL ••• ___ _ STEVENS •••• _. __ _ TRAVERS •• •.• ___ _ OCTOBER 10, 1979 J OI NT MTG . NOTES (7 -a) Report of the Joint Chairman Fox reported that the staff has bee n quite busy securi ng c on struc tion grants and have received since the l as t Board meeting $23 ,450,000 in grant s for Digestion Fac ili ties, a long with the Dewatering Fa cilities required at Plant No. 2 . The Districts wil l also rec eive approximately $9 .3 million next week for the sludge Tra ns port Facilities , which includes trucks, traile rs and equipment to process sludge at Coyote Canyon landfill site, as well as approximately $8 .2 million of construc - tion grant funds for District No. 11 to construct the Coast Trunk Sewer. Said we are also happy to report that the waiver application for modifications of secondary treatme nt, as re ported a t the l as t mee ting , was f iled on September 13th, within the time limi ts specified by EPA . He then a sked Mr . Harper to commen t on grants. FAH said he just attended a meeting in Houston a nd some of the large agencies are very disappointed in their grant program . City of LA has been hung up fo r years because of sludge line into the ocean. Sepulvada project -$40 million is still waiting for a grant . Seattle Metro says the best they can get is 6% of funds available for State of Washington . Other agencies are being forc ed into court for "consent decrees ''. Then are under time constraints. Think we have been very fortunate here . We have not taken the adversary position. Is partly through the efforts of Ray Lewis and his staff. Fox added this is a compliment to the staff . Howe ver , it has always bee n my opinion that this Board is an agress ive Board and onc e a p roblem is diagnosed , the Board has taken off after it and t h ey have gone out as individuals and worked . Commend ed Board also . Called Executive Committee mee ting for October 3 1. Directors requested it b e changed to October 30th . Invited Director Hutchison to attend in place of Mcinnis. Also invited Directors Seitz and Strauss as guests . (7-b) Repor t of the General Manager FAH reported he jus t returned from hi s trip to Europe with the AM SA technologica l group . Very interesting. Said h e hoped to have some slides in the next few days and will show at next Board meet ing . Said one of the key impressions is their approach t o water pollution prob l ems is quite d i fferent th a n t he United States . We have blanket rul es app lied a ll over the country. In E ngland, Germany and the Nether l a nds they l et some of th e small entities make up their own minds on whatever the problem is and what they want th e water to b e depending what th e water is to be us ed for . In Great Britain in uppe r reaches of the rive r, the problem sludge is d isposed of on land or inc inerated. Near the ocean sludge is barged at sea. Great Britain aske d them to work with them to convince European economics peop le they have b ee n doing this for years . In Germany have been puttin g raw sewa ge on the land for 25 years and they h ad a celebration t o s how what had been ac complished . I s on about 10 acres . Have odor probl ems . They put in secon dary treatment plant to g e t r i d of odors . Very int eres ting in England . Have organization similar to SCCWRP called SI RA . It had to d o with ins trum entation where agencies lik e our selves were buying tes ting equipment but the quality woul d fluctuate . They set up testing lab and the work t h ey are doing the re is just marve lous. Comp an ies in U.S . ar e joining this group , particul arly oil cow~anies . Had a two day trip to Poland. Also very interesting. They have technical people but sewage tre atment is down the road a ways . Also mentioned odor prob lems at Plant 2 that were brought up at the last Board meeting . Have people on that and think we ha ve temporaril y taken car e of it . Weathe r has been in our favor also . Haven't had any comp l aints for 3 wee ks. (7-c) Report of the General Counsel Nothing specific to repo rt . (9) CONSENT CALENDAR /Yamamoto questioned (c). Asked i f that $1 4 ,000 change order was added to second l owest bid, would they still be the low bidder? REL explained that this was awarded over a year ago. Changes have be en coming up over the year . Hard to say wheth er this would bri ng him over the second low bidder . (Job No . P2 -23 -6) A e a l so questioned date on page "D-4 ". Said January 19, 1979 and should have been January 19 , 19~. Al l items on consent calendar moved , seconded and carried . (lG -b) AL L DISTRICTS -Other business Don Smith , Chairman of Reorganization Committee , indicated that he understood the staff has the financial informqtion needed except for the Gann Initiati ve . Wou l d like to set a date for a Committee meet i ng at the November mtg . to review the status of the reorganization . Will be on November agenda. (29-b) DISTRICT 7 -Re Annexation No . 82 Fox asked if there were any repre sentatives from Baldwin present . None present. -2-