HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-10-10. ~ .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY,-CALIFORNIA
P. a. sax 8127, F"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
October 4, 1979
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS, 1 .. 2, 3, 5, 6., 7 & 11
_WEDNESDAY., OCTOBER-IO~· 1979 -7 :.30 P. rt
10844 ELL Is AVENUE.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA . .
TELEPHCN ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sa.td tation Districts Nos. 1, 2 / 3, 5, ·6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, will be held at the a.bove hour and date.
Scheduled Upcomi~g Meetings:
FISCAL POLICY COMMIT'"fEE MEETING-· Tuesday, October 9, 1979 at 11:00 a.m ..
EXECU'rIVE: COMMI'J.i'l'BE MEETING -Wednesday, October 31, 1979 at 5:30 p.m ..
0 v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127 ~· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714)540.2910
(714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMIITEE MEETING DATES
· JOINT BOARD MEETINGS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS
October Oct 10, 1979 Oct 25, 1979
November Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979
December Dec 12, 1979 Non Scheduled
January Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980
February Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980
March Mar 12, 1980 Mar 26, 1980
April Apr 9, 1980 Apr 23, 1980
May May 14, 1980 May 28, 1980 ~
June June 11, 1980 June 25, 1980
July July 9, 1980 July 23, 1980
August Aug 13, 1980 Aug 27, 1980
September Sep 10, 1980 Sep 24, 1980
October Oct 8, 1980 Oct 22, 1980
ll
BOARD S O F DIRE CT ORS
County Sa nitation Districts
of Orange County, California
ALL DI STRICTS
JOI NT BOARD S
SUPPLE MENTAL AGE NDA ITE MS
OCTOBE R 10, 1979 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8 127
10844 Elli s Avenue
Fountain Va ll ey, Ca lif ., 92708
Telephone s:
Area Code 714
540-2 910
962 -2 411
AGENDA
(16) (a) Consideration of motion app r oving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifi cations for Digestion and Wet Storage Facilities for the
So l ids Handling & Dewa t ering Faci l ities at Pl a n t No . 2 , Job
No . P2-24-l , n otifyin g contractors of a pre-bid conference and
makin g misce l laneous technica l clarifications
..
II
. ; •
BON.RDS OF DIRECTORS
,..,. ~ty Sanitation Districts
of Oranse County, California
Post Office Sox 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
·Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411 JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
ME·ETING DATE
OCTOBER 10, 1979 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL· INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. ·IN ADDITION, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING .THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
. (3) ·Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Recognition.of special guests
'....,I (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any
See supplemental agenda
: (6) EACH DISTRICT
(7)
Consideration of motions approving minutes Qf the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 September 12, 1979, regular
District 2 -September 12, 1979, regular
District 3 September 12, 1979, ·regular
District S -September 12, 1979, re&?lar
District 6 September 12, 1979, ·regular · ·
District 7 September 12, 1979, regular
District 11 -September 12, 1979, regular
.,
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of: ·
(al Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS ~ ~ ~
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the
joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called
only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented, unless a Director expresses a ~esire to vote differently for
any District.) See Pages "A" and "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working Capital Fund
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
9/11/79
. $ 89,498.74
1,305,851.25
26,258.38
-0-
448. SO
·266,367.92
12,702.81
:
2,923.02
5,345.93
59,606,89
6.00
$1_,769,016.73
9/25/79.
$ 73,189.59
126,386.52
38,513.75
-o-
3, 888. 34
38,186.15
10,401.96
-0-
568. 68
873.86
3,010.32
5.46
$315,024.63
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
CONSENT CALENDAR-
ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH ··g (on) .
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as noi'requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested· to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the cons~nt calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ..
Chairman ~ill determine if any items are to be delet~d from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(~)--(CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 37161 to K. P. Lindstrom
& Associates, increasing the total amount from $20,550 to$28,550
for additional services required in connection with Districts'
application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements ($4,000
of which for services, on a 'per diem fee basis, which may be required
during the review period)
Consideration of moti~n approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, authorizing an addition
of $2,174.62 to the contract with Triad Mechanical Systems, Inc.
due to differences in existing pipe which made changes in connections
necessary. See page "C"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans
and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, authorizing an addition of $14,521.00
to the contract with.H. C. Smith Construction Company for miscellaneous
modifications and additional work required See page "D"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives
at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, authorizing an
addition of $2,142.51 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, inc.
to improve strength of fuel tank.supports and for revisions to
engine cooling water piping. See page "E"
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-137, approving plans and
specifications for Restroom Facilities for Personnel Office and
Operators' Change Room and Shower Facilities, Job No. PW-07·8,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. See ·page "F"
. .
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-138, approving plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Incinerator No. 2 and Ram
Tables at Headworks "C", Job No. PW-068R, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(engineer's estimate $100,000) See page "G"
(g) Consideration of Resolution No .. 79-139, awarding negotiated contract
for rehabilitation of 1\~o (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129
and 46161, Specificati~n No. R-001, to Waukesha Engine Servicenter,
Inc. in the amount of $56,522.00. See page ''H"
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-140, to receive and file bid
tabulati~n and recommendation and awarding contract for Wet Weather
Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job
No. PW-069-1, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount
of $187 ,186.00. See pages "l" and "J"
~ ..
{CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
.;;.3.~
'.
0
(9) {CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Skid-Mounted,
Diesel-Driven Generator Set, Specification No. E-099, to Generator
Equipment Company in the amount of $7 ,422 .12 · See page "K"
(j) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Damages (Breach of Contract, to Enforce Payment of Claim in
Stop Notice, Against Payment Bond, and Common Count for Money Had
and Received), Case No. 59400, Concrete Tie and Anchor Coporation
vs. Hydro-Mechanical Co., dba Geo Structors, et al. in connection
with Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, and refer to the General Counsel for defense
and appropriate action ·
(k) (1) Consideration of motion approving continued representation by
retired Director Donald Winn in the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies through the Association's annual meeting
in August, 1980, or until replaced by Board action upon
recommendation of the Executive Committee, as recommended by
the Executive Committee
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-141, authorizing payment
of fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection
with District representation in the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies by retired Director Donald Winn, as
recommended by the Executive Committee. See page "L'' U
(1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R,
revising the sum payable per day by the contractor if not completed
within the prescribed number of days from $200 to $50 and deleting
requirement of a bid bond .
DISTRICTS 1 & 6
(m) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file repo~t of Districts'
General Counsel re sale of Districts' property in the vicinity
of Hyland Avenue in Costa Mesa. See page "M"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-150, approving Purchase and
Sale Agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited
Partnership, for sale of District property in the vicinity of
Hyland Avenue, Costa Mesa, for the amount of $24,500. See
page ''N''
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-151, authorizing execution
of G~ant Deed to Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited
Partnership, and accepting Grant of Easement from Harbor
Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, for under-
ground sewer line purposes at no cost to the Districts. See
page "0"
~ ..
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
' .. -4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 2
(n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract
No. 2-5R-l, granting a time extension of 96 calendar days to
the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. due to authorized
delay in starting construction to allow adequate time for drying
of the river bed. See page "P"
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-152-2, accepting Olive Sub-Trunk
Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Com~letion and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
See page ' Q" · .
(p) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-153-2, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 1.057 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the
City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 2
(q) Consideration of Resolution No .. 79-154-2, approving Agreement with
the City of Brea providing for payment of user fees for service
prior to completion of Annexation No. 38 -Carb.on Canyon Annexation
No. 1 to CoWlty Sanitation District No. 2, deferral of acreage fees
and establishing conditions of said annexation. See pages "R" & "S"
DISTRICT 3
(r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No.
3-20-4, authorizing an addition of $95,849.62 to the contract with
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work
required, and granting a time extension of 95 calendar days for
completion of said work, delays caused by relocation of utilities
and inclement weather. See page · "T" ----
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order.No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract
No. 3-20-4, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for
a total deduction of $131.00 from the contract with John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc. See page "U"
(t) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-155-3, accepting Knott Interceptor,
Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, as complete, authorizing execution of
a Notice of Completion therefor and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "V"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-156-3, approving agreement with
the City of Buena Park providing for resurfacing and permanent
restriping of Orangethorpe Avenue between Beach Boulevard and
Stanton Avenue by District in conjuction with construction of the
Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-22-2, and providing
for reimbursement of costs by City. See pages "W" . and "X"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
. ' ....... . . . ~::· . . ··;-5-.
;: ..
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
DISTRICT 5
(v) Consideration of motion declaring intent to enter into agreement
with the City of Newport Beach relative to District construction
of City water line in conjunction with construction of the Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and providing for reimbursement
of costs to District by Cit·y. See page "Y"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(w)
(x)
(y)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21,
granting a time extension of 25 calendar days to the contract
with Albert W. Davies, Inc. due to late start of County EMA contractor
re interim Santa Ana River improvements which were closely connected
to this project. See page "Z"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No .. 5-21,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total
addition of $10,836.80 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc.
See page "AA" · ·
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-157, accepting Santa Ana River
Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, as complete, authoriiing execution of a
Notice of Completion therefor, and approving Final Closeout Agreement
See page "BB" ·
DISTRICT 7
(z)
(aa)
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-159-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings for annexation of .72 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake .Drive and Skyline
Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange,
proposed Annexation No. 89 -Buchanan. Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance
District)
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-159, authorizing issuance of
Encroachment Permit to One Town Center Drive Associates, a Joint
Venture, relative to a structure on District College Avenue Sub-Trunk
easement, Contract No. 7-lF,in the vicinity of Bristol Street and
Sunflower. See page "CC"
DISTRICT 11
(bb) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Smith-Emery dated August 3, 1979, for in-plant pipe testing
services in connection with construction of Coast Trunk Sewer,
Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and
Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, for an amount not
to exceed $25,000. See page "DD" .
{CONSENT CALENDAR to be continued on page 7)
-6-..
~ .. . : ... ~
. \
.-
(9) . (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6)
DISTRICT 11 (Continued)
(cc) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection
Conunittee certification re final negotiated fee for
Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management
services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast
Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street
Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 11-13-2. See page "EE"
· (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-161-11, approving agreement
with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management
services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast Trunk
Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor
Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2,
in form approved by the General Counsel, on a per diem fee
basis for an amount not to exceed $25,000. See page "FF"
(dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-162-11, approving Addendum No. 2
to agreement with Keith and Associates for design of Coast Trunk
Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer
and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, providing for
construction staking services in connection.with said project and
increasing the maximum fee from $121,000 to $198,000.
See page "GG"
END OF CONSENT-CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
·.:. .. -7-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
~ ..
Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re personnel matters
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote approving amendments to 1979-80 fiscal
year budgets to reflect actual tax allocations pursuant to Proposition 13
See page "HH"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-149, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 79-20, establishing position of Personnel Analyst. See
page "II"
(15) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of the following resolutions establishing charges for Class I
and Class II permittees pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance
Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities of the
respective Districts: See page "JJ"
Class I Fee Class I I Fee (a)
District No. Resolution No. Flow(a) S.S.(b) B.O.D.(c)
1 79-142-1 $175 $21. 85 $11. 90 $250
2 79-143-2 181 22.50 1~.30 258
3 79-144-3 182 23.00 12.35 260
5 79-145-5 211 26.55 14.30 300
6 79-146-6 179 22.15 12.15 255
7 79-147-7 211 26.55 14.30 300
11 79-148-11 204 '25.20 13.80 290
(a) Per million gallons of flow
(b) Per thousand pounds of suspended solids
(c) Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(19) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
..
~ .. '• . . :. ...
..
· .
-8-
. ' . ~
,__ .
(21) . DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(.29) DISTRICT 7
{a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request of The Baldwin
Company dated September 21, 1979, .for deferral of annexation acreage
fees for 99.02 acres in the amount of $128,626.98 until June 30, 1980,
and for a conditional reimbursement agreement for the island parcels
within Annexation No. 82 -Tract No .. 9606 to County Sanitation District
No. 7. See page "KK"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel
re deferral agreement requested by The Baldwin Company. See page "LL"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-160-7; approving agreement with
Baldwin Builders for deferral of annexation acreage fees and conditional
reimbursement for island parcels within Annexation No. 82 -Tract
No. 9606 to County Sanitation Dist.rict No. 7. See page "MM"
(30) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
~ .. -9-..
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
OCTOBER 10, 1979 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(4) Recognition of special guests
~ (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any
See Stll'~lemefttal ageftea
: (6) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes Qf the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 -September 12, 1979, regular
District 2 -September 12, 1979, regular
District 3 -September 12, 1979, regular
District 5 -September 12, 1979, regular
District 6 September 12, 1979, ·regular
District 7 -September 12, 1979, regular
District 11 -September 12, 1979, regular
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
R:)~L :;,L!.. vorE.-.--Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the
joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called
only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for
any District.) See Pages "A" and "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working Capital Fund
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. s
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
9/11/79
$ 89,498.74
1,305' 851. 25
26,258.38
-0-
448.50
266,367.92
12,702.81
7,29
2,923.02
5,345.93
59,606.89
6.00
$1:,769,016.73
9/25/79
$ 73,189.59
126,386.52
38,513.75
-0-
3,888.34
38,186.15
10,401. 96
-0-
568.68
873.86
3,010.32
5.46
$315,024.63
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
r .: r:?!I Vcti? or C:!~t
ur.:1.1:m:JU:i S:il!ot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 9(A) THROUGH'9(oo)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman ~ill determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
'!
'!
~
i . I
. I
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 37161 to K. P. Lindstrom
& Associates, increasing the total amount from $20,550 to$28,550
for additional services required in connection with Districts'
application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements ($4,000
of which for services, on a per diem fee basis, which may be required
during the review period)
(b) Consideration of moti9n approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, authorizing an addition
of $2,174.62 to the contract with Triad Mechanical Systems, Inc.
due to differences in existing pipe which made changes in connections
necessary. See page "C"
(c) Consideration of motion approving :Change Order No. 6 to the plans
and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, authorizing an addition of $14,521.00
to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company for miscellaneous
modifications and additional work required See page "D"
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives
at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, authorizing an
addition of $2,142.51 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc.
to improve strength of fuel tank supports and for revisions to
engine cooling water piping. See page "E"
(e) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-137, approving plans and specifica-
tions for Restroom Facilities for Personnel Office and Women
Operators' Change Room and Shower Facilities, Job No. PW-078,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. See page "F"
(f) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-138, approving plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Incinerator No. 2 and Ram
Tables at Headworks "C", Job Nos.PW-068R-A and PW-068R-B & authorizing
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(engineer's estimate $100,000) See page "G"
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-139, awarding negotiated contract
for rehabilitation of Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129
and 46161, Specification No. R-001, to Waukesha Engine Servicenter,
Inc. in the amount of $56,522.00. See pag~ "H"
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-140, to receive and file bid
tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Wet Weather
Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job
No. PW-069-1, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount
of $187, 186. 00. See pages "I" and "J"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS {Continued)
I
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) Skid-Mounted,
Diesel-Driven Generator Set, Specification No. E-099, to Generator
Equipment Company in the amount of $7 ,422 .12 See page "K"
(j) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Damages (Breach of Contract, to Enforce Payment of Claim in
Stop Notice, Against Payment Bond, and Common Count for Money Had
and Received), Case No. 59400, Concrete Tie and Anchor Coporation
vs. Hydro-Mechanical Co., dba Geo Structors, et al. in connection
with Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, and refer to the General Counsel for defense
and appropriate action ·
(k) (1) Consideration of motion approving continued representation by
retired Director Donald Winn in the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies through the Association's annual meeting
in August, 1980, or until replaced by Board action upon
recommendation of the Executive Committee, as recommended by
the Executive Committee
(2)
(1)
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-141, authorizing payment
of fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection
with District representation in the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies by retired Director Donald Winn, as
recommended by the Executive Committee. See page "L"
Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R,
revising the sum payable per day by the contractor if not completed
within the prescribed number of days from $200 to $50 and deleting
requirement of a bid bond
! .. ·:I DISTRICTS 1 & 6
(m) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file repo~t of Districts'
ij General Counsel re sale of Districts' property in the vicinity
! i of Hyland Avenue in Costa Mesa. See page "M"
I:
f i
!
I
L
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-150, approving Purchase and
Sale Agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited
Partnership, for sale of District property in the vicinity of
Hyland Avenue, Costa Mesa, for the amount of $24,500. See
page "N"
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-151, authorizing execution
of Grant Deed to Harbor Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited
PartneTship, and accepting Grant of Easement from Harbor
Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, for under-
ground sewer line purposes at no cost to the Districts. See
page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 2
(n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract
No. 2-5R-l, granting a time extension of 96 calendar days to
the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. due to authorized
delay in starting construction to allow adequate time for drying
of the river bed. See page "P"
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-152-2, accepting Olive Sub-Trunk
Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Co1!Wletion and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
See page ' Q"
(p) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-153-2, authorizing
ini ti.a ti on of proceedings to annex 1. 05 7 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the
City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 2
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-154-2, approving Agreement with
the City of Brea providing for payment of user fees for service
prior to completion of Annexation No. 38 -Carbon Canyon Annexation
No. 1 to County Sanitation District No. 2, deferral of acreage fees
and establishing conditions of said annexation. See pages "R" & "S"
DISTRICT 3
(r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract No.
3-20-4, authorizing an addition of $95,849.62 to the contract with
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work
required, and granting a time extension of 95 calendar days for
completion of said work, delays caused by relocation of utilities
and inclement weather. See page "T" -----
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Reach 8, Contract
No. 3-20-4, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for
a_ total deduction of $131.00 from the contract with John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc . See page "U"
(t) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-155-3, accepting Knott Interceptor,
Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, as complete, authorizing execution of
a Notice of Completion therefor and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "V"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-156-3, approving agreement with
the City of Buena Park providing for resurfacing and permanent
restriping of Orangethorpe Avenue between Beach Boulevard and
Stanton Avenue by District in conjuction with construction of the
Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-22-2, and providing
for reimbursement of costs by City. See pages "W" and "X"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
-.
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
DISTRICT 5
(v) Consideration of motion declaring intent to enter into agreement
with the City of Newport Beach relative to District construction
of City water line in conjunction with construction of the Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and providing for reimbursement
of costs to District by City . See page "Y"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(w)
(x)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21,
granting a time extension of 25 calendar days to the contract
with Albert W. Davies, Inc. due to late start of County EMA contractor
re interim Santa Ana River· improvements which were closely connected
to this project. See page "Z"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No •. 5-2°1,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total
addition of $10,836.80 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc.
See page "M"
(y) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-157, accepting Santa Ana River
Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion therefor, and approving Final Closeout Agreement
See page "BB"
DISTRICT 7
(z)
(aa)
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-159-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings for annexation of .72 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline
Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange,
proposed Annexation No. 89 -Buchanan Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance
District)
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-159, authorizing issuance of
Encroachment Permit to One Town Center Drive Associates, a Joint
Venture, relativ~ to a structure on District College Avenue Sub-Trunk
easement, Contract No. 7-lF,in the vicinity of Bristol Street and
Sunflower. See page "CC"
DISTRICT 11
(bb) Consideration of motion to receive, file arid accept proposal
of Smith-Emery dated August 3, 1979, for in-plant pipe testing
services in connection with construction of Coast Trunk Sewer,
Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and
Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, for an amount not
to exceed $25, 000. See page "DD"
(CONSENT CALENDAR to be continued on page 7)
-6-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6)
DISTRICT 11 (Continued)
(cc) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection
Committee certification re final negotiated fee for
Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management
services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast
Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street
Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 11-13-2. See page "EE"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-161-11, approving agreement
with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management
services to assist staff in tunnel inspections on Coast Trunk
Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor
Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2,
in form approved by the General Counsel, on a per diem fee
basis for an amount not to exceed $25,000. See page "FF"
(dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-162-11, approving Addendum No. 2
to agreement with Keith and Associates for design of Coast Trunk
Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer
and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, providing for
construction staking services in connection with said project and
increasing the maximum fee from $121,000 to $198,000.
See page "GG"
END OF CONSENT:CALENDAP. ·
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-7-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Repor t of the Executi v e Commi t t ee and considera t i on of mot i on to r ecei ve
an d f il e t he Comm ittee 's wri tt en r eport
(12) ALL DISTRI CTS
Con s idera t ion of mot i on t o c on ven e in ex e cutive sess i on r e p e rsonnel ma tters
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
ROLL CAL L VOTE .... ___ Con s ideration of roll call v ote approv ing am endmen t s to 1979 -80 fiscal
year budgets to reflect actua l tax alloca ti on s purs u a nt to Proposition 13
(14)
Roll Call Vote or Cas t
Unani mou s Ball ot
(15)
Roll Ca ll Vote or Cas t
Un ani mous Ballot
(1 6)
See p a ge "HH"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-149, amend i ng Po s ition s a nd Sa l a ries
Re s olution No. 79-20, establishing po s ition o f Pe rsonn e l Analyst. See
"II" p age ____ _
EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of the following resolutions e stab lis h i n g ch a r ges for Cl a ss I
and Class II permittee s pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance
Es tablishing Regulations for Use of District Sewe rage Facilities of the
r e s p ective Districts: See page "JJ"
Class I Fee Cl a ss II Fee (a)
Di s trict No. Resolution No. Flow(a) S.S .(b) B.O.D .(c )
1 79-142-1 $175 $ 21. 85 $11.90 $250
2 79-143-2 181 22.50 12.30 258
3 79-144-3 182 23.00 12 .35 260
5 79-145-5 2ll 26.55 14.30 300
6 79-146-6 179 22.15 1 2 .15 255
7 79-147-7 2ll 26.5 5 14.30 300
ll 79-14 8 -ll 204 25.20 13.80 29 0
(a) Per million gallons of flow
(b) Per thousand pounds of suspended solids
(c) Per thousand pounds of bioche mical oxygen de ma nd
ALL DIS TRIC TS
Oth e r bu s iness and communic a tions or supplemental agenda items, if a ny
(16) (a) Consideration of motion app roving Addendum No . 1 to the plans and
1nMso N specifi cations for Digestion and Wet Storage Facilities for the
SU?P t EME NTAL A G ENDA Solids Ha ndling & De wat e ring Facilities a t Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-24 -l, notifying contractor s of a pre-bid conference and
\A mak i n g miscellaneous technical clarifications ~
~ VV.V '"\.11.A ;J. ,,.. ~ ~ c't1 Q_,"' ( -t.nc, 6-<tv'-'-~c. "\iv..cc.t'-l
(17) DISTRICT 1 /) '-
Oth er business and communi c ations or supplement a l agenda item s, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Considera tion of motion t o a d journ g·.? I
(19) DISTRICT 2
Oth e r business and comm un i c ations or s upp l em e nta l a gen da i t ems, if an y
(20) DISTRICT 2
Con s ideration of motion t o a d j ourn i'.'~ /
-8 -
(21) DISTRICT 3
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 3 ,
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ·,f)
(23) DISTRICT 5
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adj oum ~ ',) 1
(25) DISTRICT 6
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ',) l
(27) DISTRICT 11
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 11
• I}_ I ~,7 Consideration of motion to adjourn
(29) DISTRICT 7
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request of The Baldwin
Company dated September 21, 1979, for deferral of annexation acreage
fees for 99.02 acres in the amount of $128,626.98 until June 30, 1980,
and for a conditional reimbursement agreement for the island parcels
within Annexation No. 82 -Tract No. 9606 to County Sanitation District
No. 7. See page "KK"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel
re deferral agreement requested by The Baldwin Company. See page "LL"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-160-7, approving agreement with
Baldwin Builders for deferral of annexation acreage fees and conditional
Roll Ca!r Vote or Cast reimbursement for island parcels within Annexation No. 82 -Tract Unanimous Ballot • • • • No. 9606 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "MM"
(30) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 7 .f
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·,~r
-9-
(
JI MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JQ;NT BOARDS
Regular Meeting
Octob er 10, 1 979 -7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 El lis Avenue
Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Arco Code 714
540-29 10
9 62-241 1
Th e following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appe ar on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwi s e se l f -explanatory . Warrant lists a re enclosed
with the agenda material s ummarizing t h e bills p aid since th e l as t.
Joint Board meeting .
To minimiz e the amount of redundancy a nd duplication in th e
agenda mater i al and reduce the number of comm e nts in the Manager 's
Report, we have expanded the d escription of th e agenda items in
the a genda itself , particularl y with regard to chan g e orders and
c o ntr ac ts whi c h have b een publicly bi d and are wi thin the contra ct
budget or e n gin eer 's estimate . Detaile d change ord ers ar e i n c l uded
in th e s uppor ting material as well as the bi d tabulations for th e
c on trac ts being r econunended for award .
Joint Boards
No. 9-a -Authori z ing Change Ord er to K. P. Lind s trom &
Associ a t es for Additional Wor k o n Waiver Application .
At the J uly, 1 978 Board meeting , K. P. Lind s trom & Associates
was a uthorized to ass i st the staff in t h e prepa ration of the Fede ra l
3 0l(h) app lication fo r modif ication of secondary treatme nt require -
ments. Because of EPA's long delay s in publi s hin g the regulati o ns
and becaus e the regu l ations were significa ntly c h anged , a n amendmen t
was auth orized on July 11, 197 9, incre asing the allocation from $8,000
to $20 ,5 50 .
To complete th e ap plication by September 13 t h, the dead lin e ,
K . P. Lind strom was again r e quested to p erform additional work
beyond the scope of the contract. It ha s b een mu tua lly agreed be -
tween the staff and K. P. Lindstrom & Associates th at this addi t ional
work was done fo r a lump sum amount of $4,000.
I n a ddition , the staff an ti c ip ate s that additional efforts of
$4,000 d urin g the revi ew period by EPA may be required of K. P.
Lindstrom & Associates.
Th e staff recomme nds that t h e existing c ont r ac t b e incre ase d
from $20,550 to $28,550.
No . 9-b -Chan ge Ord e r No. 1 to Un der Drain S y stem f o r
Di gester Cleaning Beds at Re cl ama tion Plant No . 1 , Job No. P l-17.
Th e contra ct plans showed tha t th e contractor was to tie in t o
a n existing underground 6-inch ductile iron pipe at four places .
When the pipe was exposed , it was fo und to be 8 -inch transite
instead. This change order adds $2 ,17~.62 to the contr act price
to cover the cost to the contractor for providing special con -
n ections to the tr ansi te pipe. There is no extens i on of contract
time for this chan ge order . The staff recommends app r oval of this
addition to the contract.
No. 9-c -Change Order No . 6, Job No . P2-23-6 .
Thi s change order i n the total amount of $14 ,521 i s for miscel -
l aneous items pertaining to mechanical adjustments in slud ge pumps,
additional waterproofing and corrosion protection, re l ocation of
dewatering system for the widenin g and lining of the Santa Ana
River Ch annel by Et~, revision of e l ectrical conduit size, and
the relo cation of electrical conduit to a llow installation of new
cable tray. This chanse order ($14,521) adjusts the contract p rice
of this $30.67 million contract approximately $117,000, exclusive of
the $295 ,000 change order approved by District No . 11 for the initial
portion of the Coa st Trunk Sewer.
No. 9 -d -Ch ange Order No. 1 to I!1stallation of Gas Engines
with Gear Drives at RQthrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No . J -3 -1 .
Thi s change order adds $2,142 .51 to the contract price for
extra structure to the fuel tank supports for full earthquake pro-
tection and to cover the costs to the contractor for revisions to
the engine coo ling water piping. No extension of time for this change
order. The staff recommends approval for an addition to the contract
price .
No. 9-e -App roving Plans and Sp_ecificatio!"!s for Restroom
Facilities and Operator Change Room and Shower Facilit i es , Job N o.---J?W·=-rr1 a .
The staff h as completed plans and specific~tions to provide
restroom facilities for the newly -impr ove d personnel office as
we ll a s an adjacent operator change room and shower facility . It
i s the staff 's recommendation that the restroom facilities for the
personnel office , as we ll as the facilities for the operators, be
include d in the same contract because of the close proximity a nd
similarity of the proposed work . The eng ineer 's est imate for this
work is $Li5 ,000.
-2-
'
No . 9 -g -Awa rdin g Contra ct for Sp ec ifica tion No . R-0 0 1 .
At the l as t Bo a rd meet in g , the s taff recomme n de d the r e j ect i o n
of the one bid received for pa rt s and l abor requi red t o r ebui l d t wo
di ges t er gas engines bein g r e l ocated fr om Plant No . 2 t o Pl ant No. 1 .
Th e one b i d rece i ved was in t h e amoun t of $61,000 . The staff has
n egot i ated with Waukesha Eng i ne Servicenter, the sole supp l ier of
the par ts f o r these engines a n d h ave mutua l ly agreed uuon a contr act
ur i ce of $56 .522. Th e negotiated agreement inc l ude s firm prices on
s h aft rocker arm, cy l inder head nuts and s t uds and intake manifold
st uds. Th e cost o f additiona l parts items cannot be ascerta i ned
un t il the engines are complete l y disassembled for inspection.
Th e staff recommends awarding t h e contr act to Waukes h a in the
amo un t of $56,522.
No . 9 -h -Awar d of Contrac t No. PW -069 -1 -Wet Weather Contin-
gency P l an at Coyote Ca nyon Sludge Processing Site .
Bi ds were received on October 2nd for the construct i on of an
a ll weather holding basin for sludge to be processed at the Coyote
Canyon Slu dge P r ocessing Site. These facilities are requir e d to
imp lement the wet weather contingency plan as required by the
Regional Water Quality Contro l Board to insure year-round disposal
of sewage solids. Three bids were received with one cont r actor
s ubmitting a "no b i d" quotation . The two responsive bids were
$1 87 ,1 86 and $214,362. I t is the staff 's recorrn nendation that the
award be made, based upon the unit prices submitted in the proposals ,
to Sully -Miller Contracting Company of Orange in the amount of
$1 87,1 86 . (Engineer 's estimate , $2 0 0,000 ).
No. 9 -i -Award of Specification No. E -099 .
At the Apr i l Board meeting , the Genera l Manager wa s authorized
to solicit proposals and issue a purchase order for portable buildings .•
fenc i ng, and fue l and water tanks required for the operation and
maintenance yard at the Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site . The
s t aff h as prepared the specification s for one skid -mounted diesel
g e nera t or set necessary for auxiliary powe r at the Sludge Processing
S i te. Five bids were submitted on September 25th which rang ed from
a h igh o f $9 ,036.50 to a low o f $7,422 .1 2 . The staff recommends
awar d t o Generator Equ i pment Company i n t h e amount of $7 ,422 .1 2 .
No . 9 -1 -Ad dendum NO. 1 to Con t r a ct No . J -13 -2R.
Upon a u thor i zation from t h e Board, the staff was directed to
s oli c it an d n egotia t e a contract for t h e wa r ehouse office expansion
af t er publ i c bidding failed to attract any bidders. Four propos a l s
we r e received ranging from a l ow of $199,000 to a hi g h of $259 ,142 .
The award for this j ob was made t o Coy Atkins at the September Boar d
mee ting i n t he amount of $1 99,000.
-3 -
During the solicitation and n egotiation for proposa l s, an addendum
was is s u ed changin g the liquidated d amages from $200 p er day to $50
p er day. I t was the s taf f 's op inion, based on the comments f rom
pro spec t ive firms, that without thi s change it wou ld b e difficult to
obtain b ids. The staff r ecommends approva l of this adde ndum modifyin g
the liquida t e d d amage clause from $200 per day to $50 p e r day .
Distri cts Nos . 1 and 6
No. 9-m -Proposed Sale of Di s t rict _ _RE£1?erty in the Vi cinity
of Ha r bor and Warner .
At the June meet in g , the District No. 1 and 6 Boards a uthori zed
the General Coun se l to enter into negotia tions with the owners of
adjacent properties to a 20-foo t fee parce l which diagonally b isects
a n umber of l arge parcels from Harbor Boulevard easterly to th e San t a
Ana River in the City of Costa Mesa . The Directors authorized the
n egotiations on the basis that the adjacent property owners pay the
fair market value established by the Districts ' appraiser and insure
t he District s would receive sewe r easements for the e xisting pipe-
l ines.
The Districts ' General Counsel h as negotiated wi th Harbo r
Boulevard Investmen t i n th e c:ppra is ed amount of $24 ,500. The
nec essary reso lu tions are included in the agenda ma teri a l for con -
sideration.
District No. 2
No. 9-n -Ch ange Order No . 1 t o Olive Sub-Trunk Repair , Con tract
No. 2 -5R-l.
Thi s change order is for an extension of time only , and involv es
n o a ddit ion or deduction to the contract. The contractor requested
a de l ay in s t arting construction to alJ.oH adequate time for the
drying of the river bed. This delay did not cause p robl ems for the
Distric t. The total requested extension of time i s for 96 calendar
d ays . Th e sta ff r ecommends approva l of this change o rder for time
extension only.
No. 9-o -Accept ing Contr ac t No. 2-5R-l as Comp l ete .
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., contractor for th e Olive Sub-
T runk Repair, Contract No. 2 -5R -l, h as comp l e t ed a ll specifie d work
and h as executed the Final Cl oseout Agre e ment . The staff recommends
accept ance of this contract and the authori zation fo r f i ling the
Notice o f Compl e tion. (Final Contract Price: $189,970).
-4-
No. 9-p -Initiation of Proceedings -Ann exation No . 39.
Mr. a nd Mrs. Oz aki and Mr. and Mrs . Li ght , owners of two
private residences in the City of Anaheim near the Timken Road
a nd Coyote Lane intersection, have requested anne xation of approxi-
mately 1.057 acres to t he District . The staff recommends initi ation
of pro ceedings for this annexation.
No. 9 -q -Proposed Annexa tion Agreement with the City of
Brea -Annexation No . 38 .
In cluded in the agenda material is a memo from the General
Couns e l outlining the details of the agreement to be entered into
between the City of Brea and the Di stric t for the annexation of
approximately 1 90 acres in the Carbon Canyon area . The District's
staff and the City 's staff are completing the certification as to
the actual acreage and existing connections to the City sewers .
It appears at thi s time that the annexation fees should be based
on 18 8 .87 acres for a total fee of $284,240. There are various
reside nti a l a nd commercial connections in the area wh ich have been
comput ed at the $220 connection rat e established by the District
at a total fee of $61,699 .
Di strict No. 3
No. 9-r -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No . 3-20-4 .
Thi s change ord e r in the amount of $95,849 .62 includes an item
of approximately $52 ,600 for installation of v a riable thickness
asphalt overlay on Knott Avenue betwe e n Orangcthorp e Avenue and the
Fullerton Creek Channel. This work was done ih _gccordance with the
excavation permit issued by the City of Buena Park and mutually
agreed upon by the Directors at the time the contrac.t was awarded in
December , 1978 . This chan g e order also includ e s a sand slurry seal
coat over the existing roadbed from the Fullerlon Creek Channel to
Artesia Boulevard in the amount of $22 ,0 00 for which the City of
Buena Park has agreed to p a y half the cost . Additional items in
this change order are the installation of protective coating on ten
manhol es installed on the contract, as well as the installation of
one fiberglass manhole installed in lieu of the lined concrete manho le
in order that the Districts may evaluate this type of manhole for
future proj ects . Miscellaneous items in this change order are for
conduit interferences, remodeling connections to existing manholes,
concrete encasement and traffic control delineators, signs and
striping as required by Cal Trans at the Santa Ana Freeway inter -
section.
Th e staff recommends approval o f t hi s change order wh ich inc l udes
a tot al extension of time of 95 calendar days . Delays encountered
were for extra work included in the change order, delays by the
San Diego Pipeline Company for gas transmission main relocation,
delays in the relocation of e l ectr ical ducts serving the Kraft
Company and fo ur days of inclement weather and two days for un-
h ea l thy air quality stage two a l erts .
-5 -
0
No. 9-s -Ch a n g e Order No. 2 to Knott Inte rcepto r , Re a ch 8,
Contra c t No. 3 -20 -4 .
Thi s cha n ge or d e r d edu c t s $131 f r om th e con t ra ct p ri ce f o r a n
adju stment in Enp,inee r 1 s quantit i es. Th e s taff r ecommends approva l
of thi s deduct i on from the contrac t pr i ce .
No . 9 -t -Acceptin~~trac t No. 3 -20-4 as Comp l ete .
John A . Artukovich Sons, Inc ., contractor for this portion
o f the Knott Interceptor, bas completed all spe cified work and has
executed the Final Closeout Agreement . The staff recommends ac cep t -
ance of this contra ct and authorization for filing th e Notice of
Completion at a final contra ct amount of $1 ,568,168 .62 . (Original
c on tract, $1 ,4 7 2 ,450).
No . 9-u -~oving Agreement ·with City of Buena Park re
Orangethorpe Reli ef Tru1tlc Sewe!.
Th e City of Buena Parle has awarded a stree t widening and re-
surfacing project. partially funded through the AHFP funding pro gram .
A portion of this resurfacing a nd ·widening project by the City will
affect the installation of the Oran~cthorpe Relief Trunk Sewer be -
twe en Beach Boulevard and Stanton Avenue . In order to better coordi-
nate the joint efforts of the District and the City, the respective
staffs are reconm1 e nding a cooperative effort whereby the City \ .. wuld
complete the widening of the street under th e AHFP project prior to
the installation of the Di str ict 's Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer
b ut not install the final paving . After the sewer has been completed
in this re a ch , the District will, under our sewer contract , resurfa ce
the street . The City will pay to the District th e ir contract amoun t
for this resurfacing . This cooperative effort was presented by the
City staff to the City Council and they have agreed to it in concept .
I t i s the staff's recommendation that the agreement be approved .
Di strict No . 5
Cooperative f\grce~~nt -~i:th City of 'N e wport Beach in Connection
wi t h Bayside Drive Trunk Scw2r .
I n discussing the p l ans for the rep l acement of the portion of
t h e Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer , Ci t y staff i s requesting that the
Di strict consider a j oint proje c t wherein certain City water ma i ns
woul d be replaced at the same time as the sewer construction . The
Ci ty i s proposing that the District would b e the contracting agency
a n d t h e City would pay a l l the costs of t h e water main and the i r
propor tionate share of admin i strative and engineering costs.
The staff is recommending that the Boar d dec l are its i n t ent t o
en t er into an agreement with the City of Ne ·wport Beach for th i s
co ope r ative p roj ect .
-6 -
-Di s~ricts Nos. 5 and 6
No. 9-w -Change Order No. 2 to Santa Ana River Siphon,
Contrac t No. 5-21.
This change order is for an extension of time only, and in-
volves no addition or d eduction to the contra ct. Th e work required
under this contract was clo se ly tied to the construction of this
in terim S a nta Ana River improvement by the Coun t y EMA . The total s
r equested exten sion of time i s fo r 25 calendar days due to delays
c aused by the l ate start of the EMA contractor. Th e staff recom-
mends approval of this chan ge orde r for time extens i on only .
No. 9-x -Ch ange Order No . 3 t o Santa Ana River Siphon ,
Con tract No . 5-21 .
This change order adds $1 0,836.80 to the c ont ract price for
an adj u stment in Eng i neer 's quant i ties . Th e staff r ecommends
approval of th is addition to the contract price.
No. 9-y -Acc eptance of Con tract No. 5-2 1 as Comp l ete .
Albert W. Davies, Inc ., contrac to r for the Santa Ana Ri ver
Siphon, Contract No . 5-21, has compl eted all spec ifi ed work and
h as execut e d the Final Clos eo ut Agreement. The staff recommends
acc eptance of thi s contract and the authori zation for f i ling the
Notice of Completion. (O rigina l contra ct price: $3 5 7 , 000 -
Adjusted Final Contract Pr ice : $373,940.1 1).
Distri c t No . 7
No . 9-z -In itia ti on o f Proceedings fo::-Annexation No . 89 .
Bucl1 anan Deve lopment h as request e d a nnexation of a singl e-fami l y
resi dence in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline Drive in
th e uninco rporated te r ritory of the District . The staff recommends
approval of the standard reso l ution initiating pro c eedings for this
annexa tion .
No . 9 -aa -Au t hori z ing Encroachme nt P ermit, Contract No. 7 -lF .
During th e construction of the Towne Ce n ter Deve l opment , the
develop e r has constructed a cha uffer carport within the Distric t 's
sewer e aseme nt. Thi s c arport does not in terfere with t h e present
operation of the sewer facility. Th e staff i s recommending the
issua nce of an e ncro a chm e nt permi t pr e pared by t h e Ge n eral Couns e l
to a llow the carport to remain as l ong as i t does not interfere
with t h e District 's operation, ma i ntenance or reconstruction of
any sewer fa cilities wit hin the sewer easeme nt .
-7-
District No. 11
No . 9-bb -In-Plant Pipe Inspection for Coast Trunk Sewer,
Job No. 11-13-2.
In connection with the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer,
in-plant inspection is required durin g the manufacture of th e pipe
to be supplied for this proiect. The staff has solicited pro -
posals from known testing firms who perform this s ervice. It is our
recommendation that the proposal submitted by Smith-Emery Comp a n y
be approv ed at their prev ailing rates in an a mount n o t to e xceed
$25,000. This inspection service cost is grant fundable.
No . 9-cc -Resolution A
Engineering, Inc ., re Tunne
11-13-2 .
As a part of the construction management prog ram submitted to
the State for the construction of the Coast Tr unk Sewer, the staff
recommended outside assistance for the install a tion o f t h e fi v e
tunnels on this project. Pursuant to the Board's authorization at
the August meeting , the Selection Committee h a s met and is recom-
mending a contract with Butier Engineering, Inc., at established
per .diem rates in an amount not to exceed $25,000. This construction
inspection consultation is a grant eligible item.
No. 9-dd -Approving Addendum No . 2 to Agreement with Keith
& Associates to provide the construction survey s taking serv ice s
necessary for the installation of the Coast Trunk Sewer . Ba sed upon
past construction and the requirements of the pro j ect, the staff is
reconrrnending an amount not to exceed $77,000, at the· engineer's
per diem rates.
Joint Boards
No. 11 -Report of the Executive Cbnrrnittee.
The Committee met on September 26th and enclosed for Board
members is a written report of their discussions and recommended
actions for consideration by the Boards.
·No. 13 -1979-80 Budget Amendments.
The Districts have been advised of the actual tax allocations.
The County Auditor-Controller's office has requested that t he Boards
amend the approved 1979-80 fiscal year budgets to reflect t h ese
actual allocations. A sununary schedule is included in the agenda
material.
-8-
: . .
8
No. 14 -Position of Personnel Analyst.
At the time the Executive Connnittee and the Joint Boards
established the position of Personnel Administrator last spring,
the staff recorrnnended that additional staffing of the personnel
division be delayed until the Personnel Administrator was hired
and the new Administrator could evaluate the staffing needs.
At present, the personnel division includes the Personnel
Administrator ($2099/2614), a Personnel Assistant ($1059/1317)
who handles the payroll and a Senior Records Clerk ($879/1095).
The Personnel Administrator has requested that the clerk be
promoted to an existing position of Personnel Aide ($1002/1240)
and a new position be established of Personnel Analyst ($1491/1855). This
position would assist the Administrator with classification studies,
salary surveys, be responsible for the recruitment function, and
also serve as second-in-connnand in the Administrator's absence.
The staff reconnnends establishing the position of Personnel
Analyst.
No. 15 -Establishing 1979-80 Use Charge Fees for Class 1 and
Class 11 Industrial Waste Dischargers.
The Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, which
was implemented July 1, 1976, provides that the r espective Boards
establish unit charges for industrial dischargers for the conveyance,
treatment and disposal of sewage through the Districts' facilities based
upon the annual budget.
Class 1 industrial dischargers .are the major industries in the
County which will discharge volumes in excess of 50,000 gallons per
day or discharge wastewaters which have a strength 50 percent greater
than domestic sewage or are discharging constituents that are con-
sidered incompatible with the Districts' sewerage system . The Class
11 permittees are those industries which discharge an excessive
volmne or strength of sewage disproportionate to the fees and taxes
collected .
Both Class 1 and Class 11 permittees are credited the amount of
estimated ad valorem taxes paid the District, exclusive of that por-
tion of the tax paid for debt service. The establishment of these
use charge fees are pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section
302 .6 and 303.1 of the Districts' ordinance. These use charges may
be amend ed during the first part of 1980 after resolution of our
revenue program to comply with Federal requirements.
··. -9-
Fred A. Harp er
General Manager
0
.RESOLUTIONS· ·AND· ·SUP PO RT ING· ·DOCUMENTS
U·
::: > I
~FUND NO .....
(
~199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
(
PROCESSING DATE 9/07/79 PAGE
REPORT NUMBE~ AP43
1
(
'·I
•I .
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA~GE COUNTY
'IARRANT NO.
::i:::-
F
t::i -en
-I ;::o ·-\)
-I ,,.,
067083
047084
047C85
047086
047C87
0470.RS
047Cn9
C67090
0470ql
047C92
C't7tl93
0470'H
C47095
047(1%
0'17£197
~4701)8
(\47099
('l! 7100
047101
047102
01;7103
047104
047105
047106
O't7107
047108
047109
047110
047111
0 047112
047113
0471H
047115
r.47116
047117
(147118
C47119
047120
Ott7121
047122
047123
,04712'4
3lf7125
047126
047127
047128
VENDOR
ACTION INSTRUMETS co., INC.
AIR CALIFORNIA
ALEY.ANDER PO~ER TOOLS
ALLIED SUPPLY co.
AMERICA~ CYA~JMID COMPANY
~MERlCAN UfLOING SOCIETY
T~E ANCHOR PACKING CO.
ARTESIA IMPLEMENTS & PARTS CO.
JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH
ASSOCIAT[O OF LOS ~NGfLES
AUTO S~OP [CUl~MENT CO.
BANNING OATTfRi CO.
PELb PIPE & WPPLY CO.
JAMES UENZIE
OIERLY ~ ASSOCIATES, INC•
HOCK & ASSOCIATES
BOHAR ~AGNETO SE~VIC(, INC.
DOYLE [NGI~EERING CORP
BRISTOL PARK ~tOtCAL GRP., INC
R. Pe CU~KE CORPORATION
EiUTl[R. ENGINEE?.ING, me.
CALIFORNIA CONTROLS CO.
CARMAN TOOL & ABRA~IVES
J0t:1'J CAROLLO ENG lN[fRS
CHARLES w. CARTEk CO.
CASTLE METAL
O~IAN CHUCHUAS JEEP •• INC.
R.9. CLAPP CO., INC.
COLICH & SONS, A JOINT VENTURE
COLLEGE LU~~ER co., INC.
COMPRESSOR S[RVICE CO.
CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO
CONTROL SPECIALISTS, INC.
CO~VERSE-wARO-D~VIS-OIXON
CORE-kOSION PP.OOUCTS
OM"HLS TIJ\l Sf"r.VICE
llLBERT w. 01,vrrs, ir;c.
C.R. DAVIS SUPFLY CO.
OE GUELLt & SONS GLASS CO.
OEP.BY'S TOPSOIL
OU~N EDWAROS CORP.
[ASrnA"11t INC.
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES DIST.
ENCHANT£Rt H..C.
.. ESCONDIDO ~ACHINERY CO.
Fill[~ SUPFLY co.
CLAIMS PAID 09111/79
AMOUNT
$160 .52
$212.00
S99.00
$1,452.H
ss,553.19
S8elf8
$208.41
$1+1.59
t.125,421.58
$1.045.33.
$445.20
$40lt.82
u,221.12
S84.96
$900.00
$85.86
$82.36
Ht550.35
$39.00
$66t260.63
S15t996.00
$118.40
S329.19
$180t379.96
S3t0!J2.01
$261.82
$5,018·61
$33.Slf
$127t983.60
Slf07.71
s23,357.91
SCJ,241.08
n. 57
SJ,516.32
$433.~0
S356.lf8
S59t59R.OO
$134.02
$25.27
sso.oo
!.585.76
$lf49.90
U8lf.45
s3,ooo.oo
1131.75
$621.27
DESCRIPTION
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
AIR FARE
TRUCK PARTS
VALVES
CHEMICALS
PUBLICATION
PIPE SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
CONTRACT 3-20-4
ELECTRICAL SUPPLI~S
TRUCK PARTS
TRUCK BATTERIES
PIPE SUPPLIES
EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
SE'LF-INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR
PAINT SUPPLIES
ENGINE PARTS
SURVEY 3-13-1, SURVEY 3-20-4, RETENTION 3-13-1
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
CONTRACT PW-074, CONTRACT PW-072, CONTRACT PW-066~1
CONTRACT MGR. P2-23
CONTROLS
SMALL TOOLS
WAIVER APPLICATION, ENGR. P2-2S. ENGR. P2-24
BEARING SUPPLIES
STEEL STOCK
-1979 JEEP CJ-7
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
RETENTION 3-13-1
LUMBER
RETENTION E-092, COMPRESSOR PARTS
CHLORINE
CONTROLS
SOIL INVESTIGATION
"STORAGE TANK
TRUCK TIRES
CONTRACT 5-21
HOSES
GLASS SUPPLY
GRAVEL
PAINT SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLI.ES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OCEAN MONITORING
TRUCK PARTS
ENGINE PARTS
::: =r FUND NO
N :::
WARRANT NO.
Olf7129
047130
04 7131
047132
(1"7133
fr't7134
047135
04 71.3& :s> 0'+7137
Gi 047138 fTI O't 7139 2
t:::1 0'47140
~ 0-47l'tl
~· 047142
-r.: 0471'13
fTI 047144 -:.-=: C.47145 -::tt: 047146
co 0471'17
I
04714!\
.. 047149
:::t::-047150
I 047151 .--047152
t::j 047153 ,...... C47154
~·(/) 047155 -I 047156 :;o
t--t 0'17157
r> 047158 -I C47159 (/) 04716(1
047161
047162
0~71C.3
04 7164
047165
047166
C'47167
047168
(147169
Olf7170
Ott 7171
O'f7172
0'47173
.... Olf 7174 .... :c>
I
N :::
9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/07/79 PAGE
REPORT NUMSER ~P43
COUNTY SANITATIGN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
VENDOR
FISCHER & PORTfR
FISHER SCIENTIFIC co.
FLO-SYSTEMS
FLUO~ ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
FUSES UNLIMITED
GENERAL ELECT~lC SUPPLY
·GENERAL TfLCPHONE CO.
GOLDENWEST FERTILIZER CO.
M.[. GRAY CO.
DON GFEEK & ASSOCIATES
CHARLES G. Ht.Rr;y, INC.
HAUL-AWAY CONTAINERS
HEwLETT PACKARD
HOLLY~OOO TIRE OF ORANGE
HOOKER CHEMICALS & PLASTICS CO
HOUSE CF eATTERIES
HO~ARO SU~PLY CO.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
HUNTTNGTO~ SUPPLY
INDIAN SPRINGS MFG. to., INC.
IRVINE RANCH W~TER DISTRICT
KAHAN REAHINCS & SUPPLY
KI~G BEARIHG, INC.
KLEE t\-Ll NE CORP
KOSLO~ SCIENTIFIC CO.
L•O•IJ.s., INC.
LFE ENVIRON~E~TAL LABS
~.R. LADE'llG CO.
LANDS ~f.LDING
LARHY'S HLDG. MATtRIALS, INC.
LIGHTI~G OISTRIOUTORS, INC.
K.P. LINDSTROM & ASSOCIATES
LOS ANGELES CHfMICAL CO.
LOS ANGELES TIMES
HA TT -CU LOR t INC•
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO.
MESA CON~OLIDATEO ~ATER
MIC~AY TOOL t $UPPLY co.
MILLERS PRINTERY
MOTOROLAt IMC.
NATIONAL LUHOER SUPPLY
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
NO~OCO PRODUCTS
NOTTINCHAM FACIFIC CO.
OFFICE PROOUCTS CO., INC.
CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79 .. •
AMOUNT
H53.02
$501.32
$16t959.92
S6t525e54
$991.65
SHl.13
$63.60
$173.08
Sl8t898.75
Slf64.79
$448.50
!126. 36
sao.oo
$200.00
s1,1s2.oo
s2,101.91
$82.81
$216.29
Ut924.75
S.309.57
$205.95
S.3.20
$161.84
$868·1'+
$165.98
. $60. 25
$264.09
$20.00
Sl7A .25
SlOl.6'+
$58.30
$201.76
S6t01't.2.8
$2,761.83
$118.53
$205.08
S2'tO •• lf7 ·
$6.00
1237.12
$15.90
$61.38
$402.lf!
s200.oo
$69.97
$66.25
$169.H
DESCRIPTION
PIPE SUPPLIES·
LAB SUPPLIES
PUMP PARTS
ENGR. 1 MGD JPL-ACTS
WATER USEAGE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
SLUDGE HAULING
VALVE PLUGS
CONSTRUCTION 2-SR-l
CHEMICALS
.TRASH DISPOSAL
.LAB SEMINAR
TRUCK TIRES
CHEMICALS
TRUCK BATTERIES
PLUMBING PARTS
WATER USEAGE
ENGINE PARTS
GASKET SETS
WATER USEAGE
BEARING SUPPLIES
BEARING SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
STEEL STOCK
SMALL HARDWARE
LAB ANALYSIS
GAUGES
WELDING SUPPLIES
CONCRETE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
WAIVER APPLICATION
CHLORINE .
SUBSCR.I PT IONS
· ENGINE PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
WATER USEAGE
ROUTER KIT
TYPE SETTING
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SMALL HARDWARE
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
TRUCK PARTS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
( (
2
•
•
(
':::
:z:;. ( ~ I
\.1'I
:: FUND NO
~
I r-
t=' ,__.
(/)
-I
:::::1 ,__. .. n
.. ~
(./)
\lARRANT NO.
047175
Olf7176
047177
047178
047179
047180
0471Rl
Cl.f71R2
047183
047184'
047185
0471A6
C47187
0471A8
047189
047190
OH191
047192
c 4 71 c:>3
047194
047195
047196
047197
047198
047199
047200
Olf7201.
047202
Clf7203
04720lf
Olf7205
047206
047207
047208
047209
0'+7210
047211
047212
0"7213
0472l'f
. 0'17215
OH216
0 '+ 721 7
047218
047219
047220
( (
9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/07i79 PAGE
REPORT NU~OER AP43
3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79
VENDOR
ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
PACIFIC TELEPHONE
PARAMOUNT EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND SALES, INC.
PASCAL & LUDWIG .. me.
M.C. PATTEN CORP.
PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER
PETTHIONE CORP.
TO~ FO~TONt INC.
!>OSTl-IASHR
HAROLD PRI~ROSE ICE
P.ROTECTO -FLASHt INC.
RICARD'S HYDRAULICS
RICHEY ELECTRONICS, INC.
R osr ~Ot;fH' INC.
ShLES ENGINEERS LIMITED
SAND COLLAR OUSINfSS FORMS
SANDE ECUIPMENT CO.
SANTA ANA DODGE
SHAMROCK SUPPLY
SHEOD ~RO~N, l~C.
SLtDOEN ENGINEERING
H.C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO.
SOUTH ORANGE SVPFLY
so. CALIF. COASTAL WAT(R RESEARCH PROJECT
SOUTHER~ CALIF. EOISON ~O.
SO. CALIF. PNEUMATICS
STAR Ow STEEL ..
SUPERINTE~OENT OF DOCUMENTS
THE SUPPLIERS
SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
TFI BUILDING MATERIALS
.TAM'S STATIONERS
TARDIFF SHEET METAL
TAYLOR-OU~:N
THOMPSON LACGUER CO.
THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES
TRANS-\,.'f ST FORD
TRl~O ~ECHANJCALt INC.
TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC.
UNITED PA~CEL Sf.P.VlCE
UNITED STATES EOUIPMENT CO., I
V'JR SCIENTIFIC
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO.
VALVE & PRIMER CORP.
. . .
AMOUNT
$157.4-6
S168.40
S4t044•10
S46e9l
Slt'+l6e96
$20,269.98
15'J8.87
$153.96
u,145.94
Sl86.tt6
s1,ooo.oo
S36.00
S2t303.lf6
HSS.80
$89.71
$lf62.66
$156.64
s1aq.97
$138.19
$23.85
tS.09
$~76.CJ7
$85.00
$802t618.20
$ 77.94
.s1,soo.oo
S37.500.91
$19.24
S94.59
s21.oo
S2A7.00
$104.10
$116. 71
$19.61
S5S7e50
$458.13
192.60
$9:?0.45
S35t616.00
$131t377.B2
UG0.93
$49.76
$239.&9
$630.09
$506.(,0
SltOJ0.32
DESCRIPTION
CHEMICALS
LAB ANALYSIS 3-13-1
BASIN EQUITY ASSESSMENT
TELEPHONE
TRUCK PARTS
CONTRACT J-3-1
PRESSURE GAUGES
MOWER BLADES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
ENG !NE PARTS
POSTAGE
INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
VALVES
OFFICE FORMS
ENGINE PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
PAINT SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
TESTING 3-20-4
CONTRACT P2-23-6
PLUMBING PARTS
WAIVER APPLICATION
POWER
REGULATOR .
STEEL STOCK
SUBSCRIPT ION
SMALL TOOLS
SMALL TOOLS
PLUMBING PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ROOFING J-6-lG
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PAINT SUPPLIES
TEMPORARY ACCOUNTING HELP
DUMP TRUCKS
CONTRACT Pl-17, CONTRACT PW-061
TRUCK PARTS
DELIVERY SERVICE
COMPRESSOR PARTS
LAB SUPPLIES
PLUMBING PARTS
VALVES
..•
•
::::
:t:=a _b. I FUND NO
. :::
:t> r r-.
t:::J .......
en
~ ;:o .......
('""') . ·--;
en
::: > I
J::: :::
.:...
\,/ARRANT NO.
OH221
047222
047223
04722'+
0'+7225
047226
(
9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 04Tt 9/07/79 PAGE
REPORT NUMBE~ AP~3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
. CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79
VENOOP.
DANIEL K. WALKER
JOHN R. WAPLES
WESTERN WHOLESALE CO.
WESTINGHOUSE SUPPLY CO.
XEP.OX CORP.
EVERETT H. YORK CO. ·
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/11/79
SUMMARY
.#2 F/R FUND
113 OPER FUND
1#3 ACO FUND
113 F/R FUND
115 OPER FUND
#5 F/R FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
lt5&6 ACO FUND
#6 OPER FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7 OPER FUND
#7 ACO FUND
1111 OPER FUND
JT. OPER FUND
CORF
WORKING CAP. FUND
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID SEPTEMBER 11,· 1~79
AMOUNT
Utt47.19
s211.20
$207.53
$512.19
Sl,943.88
S46el0
Slt769t016.73
~--------------------------------
AMOUNT
$ 448.SO
8,146.91
131,936.35
126,284.66
9,186.49
3,516.32
8.89
59,598.00
7.29
6.00
1,870.83
1,os2.19:
5,345.93
89,498.74
1,305,851.25
26,258.38
$1,769,016.73
(
DESCRIPTION
ANNEX 87 REFUND
ODOR CONSULTING
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
XEROX REPRODUCTION
ENGINE PARTS
(
·:::
t:O FUND NO(
. I
~ .. ~
!J~RRANT NO.
:J>
~
rT1 ;;;;:
t::1 :r>
...._
. --1
~
:.;:::: co
I
:I:>
I
I
t::1
1--'1
(/.)
--i ;:c ........
n
-I en
:::
to
I
~ :::
Q47236
n47?.37
047:?36
(147239
G47:?4C!
G47241
0'+7:.''f~
r.47:>43
~IJ7244
:)47245
04 7?4 6
0"-7247
Ct. 7;"4€
n4n49
0'+725C
~47;51
ll4 72r:·~
Ci47253
'1117:'54
r.4ncss
'Jlf 7256
C47257
0 '~ 7?56
!)47"!:9
'.:ti72!:C
C1«i72&1
C47;>(,2
ri47263
'>47?f.4
0472!>5
'J4 77H:
(l47267
C'f7:!6S
!:41~b9
Ol.f7:'711
047271
04 7272
047273
U4 7:>7'f
047275
047?76
0't 7277
r~nrn
047~79
047:'80
0472P.l
9199 -JT DIST ~ORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING OAT( 9/25/79 PAGE
~EPORT NU~BER AP~3 .
1 (
COUNTY SANITATIO~ OISTRIC?S OF ORANGE COUNTY
VENDOR
A.w.c. CALIFORNIA
ACTIVE S4LES co., INC.
ADVANC£0 ELECTRONICS
ALCO TRA~SPORTATION CO.
AMERICAN CYANIMID COMPANY
ANIXTER PHUZAN
ARTESIA IMPLEKtNTS & PARTS CO.
ASSOCIATED OF LOS ANGELES
"THC A.T. & s.F. RAILROAD CO.
13MJK f..MEFCICMD
BA~NING UATTERY CO.
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS
JM:Es tlDJ: H.
eOPfR ~AGNETC SERVICEt INC.
BbYLE ENGI~EERING CORP
E0 ~RAATELIE:N
DUILDING ~EVSt INC.
E.D. DULLARD CO.
R. P. BURKE CORPORATION
C t R RECONDITIONING CO.
CS COMPANY
CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC•
C4LJF. A~soc. OF SAN. AGENCIES
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
CH(STEF. PtUL CO.
CllfVRON u.s.A., i:Nc.
COLLEGE LUMDER CO., INC.
COM~ERC[ STATIONERS ANO PRINTERS CO.
CONSOLIDATED ELECT~JCAL DIST.
CON~OLJDATED RfPRODUCTIONS
CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO
CO~TROL SPECIALISTS• JNC•
COOPCR E~ERCY SfRVICES
COSTA M~~A AUTO PAPTS• INC.
6YRGN L. CHUM[, INC.
CUHTIN MATPESON SCIENTIFIC
DAILEY CONSTRUCTION SERVICE
P.F:LPhI SYSTE.r-~s. INC.
DEF:OY'~ TOP~OIL
DODGE CON~TRUCTJON NEWS.
DUN~ (~WA~DS CORP.
E. A ST l·i f\ N , l l\i C •
E'lfCTRIC n.ALANCING CO.
ENGINffRI~G-SCIENCEt INC.
ENGINEERS SAL[S-SERVICE CO.
FILTER SUPPLY CO.
CLAIMS PAlD 09/25/79
AMOUNT
$1'f4.15
$204.81
$216.02
$lo. 99
SG,605.57
$96.40
$'f07.76
$941.66
s1.01s.30
$206.81
$42G.54
$179.(18
186.22
$79.25
Slt295.00
$126.00
. $60.97
$50.H
$9,'+20.31
$260.00
$1,547 .11
$86.50
$165.00
s.oo
$72.85
$2.396.54
!.124.Hl
$69.58
$365.61
s:.5,989.84
S6,9A2.75
$~0. Lt 0
S.2.15.05
$77.09
$15,32'1.84
$34 ·'•2
$224.70
s2,soo.oo
sioo.10·
$628.05
$383.40
$283.82
£75.00
$3,123.00
$!lf5.QO
$394 .11
DES CR IPTI ON
CONTROLS
CARTON STAPLES
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
FREIGHT
CHEMICALS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTION CONTRACT
TRAVEL EXPENSES
TRUCK BATTERIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
ENGINE PARTS
SURVEY 3-20-4
Al.R FARE REIMBURSEMENT
PUBLICATIONS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
CONTRACT PW-072 AND CONTRACT PW-074
COMPRESSOR REPAIR
VALVES
LAB SUPPLIES
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
VOIDED
VALVES
GASOLINE
LUMBER
OFFICE "SUPPLIES
·ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION .
,CHLORINE
CONTROLS
ENGINE PARTS
TRUCK PARTS .
CONTRACT PW-076
.LAB SUPPLIES
LEGAL ADVERTISING 11-13-2
.EDP PROGRAMMING
GRAVEL SUPPLY
LEGAL ADVERTISING PW-24-1
PA I NT SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ENGINE REPAIR
VALUE ENGINEERING P2•24
PI PE SUPPLIES
ENGINE PARTS
FUND UO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSIN~ DATC 9/25/79 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
2 = ti::'
I ...
N. ::
COU~TY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/25/79
~AP.RANT ~O.
......
---:i. rn·.-
~·· _.;:::,,•.
"::i:t:: co
.....
)::>
I r
t::::1
t--4
(/')
-:-I. ::::c
t--4
.r>
-:-I
'"'
::
c::J
I
N .... ...
0 4 728;>
0 4 72~3
047"84
047;>R5
047286
C47287
(H1 721Hi
~A72B7
047;-9r
047;'91
OA7292
r.4nr:?~
'.}47294
(14 7~9!:>
r: b. 7 :'9 6
C'47:.'97
04 7?98
P4n99
f.4 7 ~(!0
04 7301
c,4·1:!.r2
l'J4 73!)3
04730'+
r?47305
CA7.,06
04 73rJ7
047;::nR
r47?:09
(·1•7310
~47?.ll
r 1+n12
(·47:1il3
r.1i1:.14
(·"7~15
,, 47:'·16
(l47?,17
fl47316
0 1.47319
C4"T?.n
C"4n21
P,41?·2?
P,1;1?·23
047!-~4
r.47:-25 ..
£'47326
047?·27
(
VENDOR
FI LTR 0 COMP.ANY
FISCHFR & PORTER CO.
FLUOR ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS,
FOOTHILL FEED CO.
FOREMOST THREADED PRODUCTS
CLIFFORD A. FORKEkT
FOUNTtJN VALLEY LOCK & SAFE
FRICK-GALLAGHER MFG.
FUSES UNLI MI TEO
G. ~. GALLO~AY CO.
.GENERAL CLECTRIC SUPPLY
G~~[RAL TflfPHON[ CO.
J.O. GILBERT & ASSOCIATES
DON GREEK & ASSOCIATES
GROTH CHEVROLET CO.
HS.K SALES
HALP~[N SUPPLY co.·
THE HANDYMAN
HAr.~OR P.ADIATOR
CHl.R LE s G. HAROY' me.
H.'~HRIS CONVEYOH CO.
HAUL-A~AY CONTAINERS
HE~D~ICKS G.M.c., INC.
OAVto A. HODGSON
HOOKER CHE~lCALS & PLASTICS CO
HOUSE or ~ATTERJES
HQ~AP.D SUPPLY CO.
CITY OF HUNlINGTON BEACH
H:CUSTP.l H · $/IF( TY SIGNS Mf:'G.
I~T[RNATIGNAL HARVESTER CQ•
BRYON JACK~UN PU~P DIVISION
JOHNS Of·; CONTROL~. we.
KCE~AN PIPE & ~UPPLY CO.
KI~G P.fARI~G, J~C.
KNOX IN~U~TFIAL SUPPLIES
D~ .• F:or:rn T c. y. KOH
l & N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO
L.P.t.:.~., INC.
LAf<RY'S ~~Ll1G. MATERIALSt ·HJC.
lAllRS£rJ COLClR L/.B
LEE t FO CO~SULTINd ENGR.
LE~CO f.L(CTRIC CO.
RAY E. LEWI!,
LIET2AU Pt.TTfRNS., INC.
LIFECO~-S~FETY srRVICE SUPPLY
LIFTEX SLING~, INC.
INC.
AMOUNT
.• $166.67
S'+t003el2
Sl5t557.58
t23.85
$498.'+2
f.957.20
$193.47
144.SlJ
t4 22 .·a9
$6,010.20
$120.~lf
$lft525.99
s2,21a.s1
$2,357.50
$107.11
$7'+.33
$361.35
SlF.7.48
$19·50
$35.05
$93lf e'+8
$220.00
•$llf8. 73
$9.00
$1,573.25
$130-51
S2t310.69
uo.13
$33.80
s25.53
1-27.R9
$l'lq.Rl
Slt596.98
u. 25~ • 1"
:Pt 0 • n 0
$200.00
s 1 0 ' 4 3 0 • lf4
. $2H.33 · · ·s;. 75 .• %
$65.'+6
$9,619.l\4
$1?S.7.1
$47.75
s2.,226.oo
$235.64
i1n&.n
(
l'ESCRIPTION
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
JPL EVALUATION
TRUCK PARTS
SMALL TOOLS
SURVEY 5-21 AND SURVEY P2-23~6
DOOR LOCKS
FREIGHT
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
SCOPE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
EIS/EIR
SURVEY 2-SR-1 AND ENGINEERING COYOTE CANYON
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ACETYLENE HOSE
TRUCK PARTS
TRUCK REPAIR
CtEANfNG COMPOUND
CONVEYOR RENTAL
TRASH DISPOSAL
TRUCK PARTS
EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
CHEMICALS
BATTERIES
VALVES
WATER USEAGE
SAFETY SIGNS
TRUCK PARTS
FREIGHT
VALVES
PIPE SUPPLIES
BEARING SUPPLIES.
SMALL TOOLS
WAIVER APPLICATION
UNIFORM SERVICE
WELDING SUPPLIES
GRAV El: SOl?P('l' ~s·
F.JLM::P.ROCESSING
ENGR.:HYORAULrC RELIABILITY
TRUCK PARTS
TRAVEL EXPENSES
IMPELLER PARTS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
SHALL TOOLS
::: .Fur-~o r.Jo
to .. ~.
~1~9 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 9/25/79 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP4J
I
VJ ::
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS -OF ORANGE COUNTY
. :;:t:
00
:t>
I r.
d
t--4 en .
-:-i ::;o -.....
n
~
(/)
IJAP.P.Af'!T NO.
Cl4B2R
C47:!·2o
c 't 7 ~3 0
C47:'·31
l'.'47332
D4n.:B
~47334
fl47?.35
C47Z36
P.473.37
l)ll 7?,3P.
04;:39
Cl.i7~l!O
c 4 7 31: l
(' 1t 7 34 2
~4 7346
~"7347
'J <i 7 34A
e1113~9
P.'4735('1
~4B51
047.:!52
0" 7353
·04 73~4
ri473~5
:'t:7:11%
G47357
04./?.58
C'47 ~5-:1
(\47.%0
i)l.;~561
(l4B6:?
!) 4 7363
. ~47:"~lt
!'!472'(~~
C'f 73n6
~473(,7
t:''• 7~·fi8
0473£;9
n 4 73 7CI
C4Pl71
047372
047:!.73
VENDOR
LOOMIS AIRCRAFT, I~C.
THE LOOSE LEAF HOUSE
L05 ANGELES CHEMICAL CO.
THE CHARLES LO~E CO.
ROHERT J. LUNG & ASSOCIATES
MASTER 8LUEPRI~T & SUPPLY
MCCALLA SROS. PUMP & DRILLING
MCM~STC~-CARR SUPPLY CO.
MILLERS PRI~TERY
~·oTOROLA, I~C.
l\'.Fi. Pf'OOUCTS
NATIONAL CASH ~f GTSTER
NE~APK EL~CTRO~ICS
CITY OF N[~PORT BEACH
OAKlTE PRODUCTS, INC.
0 X Y G ~-N $ E. P V I C E
PACIFIC TELEPHONE
PAR PRESS HUSINESS FORMS, INC.
PA.RTS UNLIMITED
M.C. PATTEN CORP.
PEAT, H•RWICK, MITCHELL & CO.
POSTMAST(R
HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE
PRODUCTOOLt INC.
PROTECTO -FLASH, INC.
RAl~~dw DISPOSAL CO.
THE' REGISTER
OENNTS l1. RE"IO •
~EYNOLD ILUMINYM SUPPLY·CO.
RODDING CLEA~;a:G MACHINES,· INC
SA~ DifGO PIPELJ~E CO.
SA~TA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS
SEtRSt ROEHUCK ~ CO.
SJi,'\LLER & LOHR, INC.•
SH~"tROCK SUPPLY
SHE?llAP.O MACHINERY CO.
SHEn~r~ ~ILLIA~S co.
SOUTH ORANGE SUPPLY
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDI.SON CO.
SO. CAL. GtS CO.
SO. CALIF. ~ATFR CO.
SOUTtirnN COUNTIES OIL CO.
SOUTHWEST SE~ER EOUJPMENT
SPAR~Lf TTS DRINKING WATER
STANLEY PAPfP co., INC.
SHROW STEEL
CLAIMS PAID 0?/25/79
AMOUNT ..
$137.50
·s95.lf0·
S20 1fel6
$3-\0.80
$159.00
$158.79
$25t443.31
$180.53
$137.12
$261.21
$936.97
$520.El~·
.$23.tO
$9.'15
$52'4.98
$87.31
$250.73
$49.29
$930.31
SP.5.75
$4t302.00
$500.00
$24.CO
$4'1.23
$301.95
$107.10
$2,645.82
.$37.93
$795.00
$300.00
$32,1)26.4(,
:tHS.50
$17. 22
$1,096.00
$207.52
$332.75
$258.91
$105.07
S513t0'!9.lf9
$3t'I06:31
$8.42
$7,209.80
$357.61
$651.1q
$8'4.75
$2t230.27
DtSCRIPTI ON
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CHEMICALS
PUMP PARTS
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES
CONTRACT E-090 AND PUMP PARTS
WELDING SUPPLIES
TYPE SETTING
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
PIPE SUPPLIES .
TIME CARDS
. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
WATER USEAGE
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
SPECIALTY GASES
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
STRlP CHARTS
ANNUAL AUDIT
POSTAGE
INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING'.ICE
SMALL TOOLS
SAFETY SIGNS
TRASH DISPOSAL
ADVERTISING
.TRAVEL EXPENSES
STEEL STOCK
3-20-3 INSPECTJON
RELPCATE PIPE 3-20-4
ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
SHALL TOOLS
ENGINEERING BIG C.ANYON
SHALL TOOLS
TRUCK PARTS
PAINT SUPPLIES
PLUMBING PARTS
POWER
NATURAL GAS
WATER USEAGE
DIESEL FUEL
TRUCK PARTS
BOTTLED WATER
PAPER PRODUCTS
STEEL STOCK
3 (
•
~FUND NO
.·.l::" ._ :::
Wt.RR ANT
047374
O't7375
C4737(,
Olf 7377
047378
0'+7379
04n.so
· .. :t> (' 473A1
c;-, 0'17382
·C!J 047383 ·-C'473M
t=j 04n,r,5 :t> fl473P.6 _.......,. 0 4 "/ 38 7
-:-i 04n.P.A m (147389 3 ~lf7~90
:;t: 04 7391
;00 047392
; I 04E93
I 01+73~4
:t> ('47.3')5 r-047:!96 r-r,47~97
-t'::' ll47~98
~ 047?i9CJ ·en
-I 047400
:::0 C4740l ....... 0'47402
Cl . -I en
NO.
9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAT( 9/25/79. PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS• OF. ORANG( COUNTY
VENDOR
SUPER CHEM CORP
THE SUPP LI ER S
J. UAYNC SYLVESTER
TFI BUILDING MATERIALS
TAYLOR-OUl\N
TAYLOR-JETT CO.
TECHNICAL BOOK CO.
TEGLEN -AIRDRAULICS
THOR TEMPORARY Sf RVICES
J. T. THORPE, INC.
TIHVEL AUFFS
TRUCK & AUTU SUPPLYt INC.
TMININC LABORATORIES
u.s. PLASTIC CORP.
UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF.
UNITED PARCEL S~RVICE
UNITtD STATES EQUIP~ENT CO., INC.
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO.
VALVE & PRIMER CORP.
VAF:F:Ct H;C.
YESTER~ ~IRE & ALLOYS·
XEROX COi-!PUTER
x=:~ox CORP.
ZJP TEMP0~4RY PERSONNEL
DON~LD Le FOX
JA!-':ES ['. SHARP
0 0 r~ A. L 0 W ll'HJ
JOHN C~~OLLO ENGINEERS
JOHN CtP.OLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN
CLAIMS PAID 09/25/79
AMOUNT
S837 elJO·
$261.03
$521.59
$37.38
$'460.99
!.818.06
s2s.02
$l q. 38
$If" 8 .13
i:rno .21
$92.00
$660.90
$13.00
$46.53
$21.34
$20.H
$697.'42
Slt056.69
$251.16
$17 .;.H
$280.90
S5t3~6.72
s2.n1 • .sCJ
$l OB .6A
$240.%
$262.00
S.583.37
S6t537.70.
Sl3t690.67
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/25/79
SUMMARY
112 OPER FUND
112 ACO FUND
#3 OPER FUND
#3 ACO FUND
#3 FIR FUND
#5 OPER FUND
#5 ACO FUND
#7 OPER FUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 ACO FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#5&6 ACO FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
JT. OPER FUND
CORF
WORKING CAP. FUND
------------------~---------------
AMOUNT
$ 1,988.04
1,900.30
4,564.69
300. 00 .
33,321.46
9,305.96
1,096.00
568.68
636.53
237.33
2,231. 12
779.20
5.46
73,189.59
126,386.52
58,513.-75
DESCRIPTION
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH
PLUMBING PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
PIPE SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
PUMP PARTS
TEMPORARY ACCOUNTING HELP
CONTROLS
AIR FARE'
TRUCK PARTS
TESTING P2-23
LAB SUPPLIES
GASOLINE
OEllVERY SERVICE
COMPRESSOR PARTS
PI PE SUPPLIES
VALVES
FREIGHT
FRAME TORCH
DATA PROCESSIN'G
XEROX REPRODUCTION
TEMPORARY RECEPTIONIST
CASA CONFERENCE
CASA CONFERENCE
CASA CONFERENCE
ENGR. FACILITIES PLAN AND ENGR. P2-25
ENGINEERING P2~23
( TOTAL CLAIMS PAID SEPTEMBER 25, 1979 ( 5,024.63 ,•
~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ____ NA __________________ _
C.O. N0. _____ 1 __________ ~-------
CONTRACTOR: TRIAD MECHANICAL, INC. DATE __________ o_c_to_b_e_r __ l~,.._1_9_7_9 ______ __
Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at
JOB: Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17
------------------------~------------------~-----------------------------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~) $ 2,174.62
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additio~s to or deductions !rom·the contract price are here~y approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated August 17, 1979
ADD:
and Districts'letter dated September 14, 1979.
Contract plans showed that the Contractor was to tie into
an-existing underground 6-inch duptile iron pipe at four
places. When the pipe was e~posed, it was.found to be
8-inch transite instead. This change order cov~rs the cost
to the Contractor for providing special connections.to the
-t;ransite pipe.
TOTAL ADD
.·
No.time extension this change order.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Cl1anges
. This Chang:c (ADD) ~:JIDnt{R)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved:
$2,174.62
$2,_174.62
$ 487,78'1.00
$ 0.00
$ 2,174.62
$ 489,958.62
' TRIAD MECHANICAL',· INC.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
· lly
------------~----------~~~----By--------------------~------~----
Cont rue tor-Chief Engineer
. : . . : : .:
"C" .~GEND.~ ITEr1 #9(B) 1~.LL DI STR I CTS . "r" v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG~ COUNTY
P. O. UOX 3127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
r •
Page 1 of 4
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. __ C_-_0_6-_1_0_7_3-_1_4_0 ____ __
\w)
C.O. N0. ___ 6~------~---------
CONTRACTOR t H. C. Smith Construction Company DATE September 26, 1979
------------------------~-------
JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6
Amount of this Ch~mgc Order (ADD) $ 14, 521. 00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following "changes in the contract
and/or contract work arc· hereby authorized and as compcnsati on therefor, the fol lowing
' additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby appro~ed.
Item A
The rotation of the return activated sludge pumps located in East Secondary Sludge
Pump .Station and Waste Acti viated SI udge Pwnps .in West Secondary Sludge Pump Station
were revised from counterclockwise·, as shown in co.ntract drawings, to clockwise
rotation. This change was directed to minimize maintenance costs and inventories
for spare parts by having all similar equipment with identical rptation.:
ADDED COST: ·
EA"fENSI ON OF TIME:
Item B
$ 673.00
0 Calendar·Days
The· inner cac;ing of the elevators in the East and West Secondary Sludge Pump Stations\w)
were filled with oil saturated sand to prevent corrosion of the interior surface of
this cas~ng. No provisions were incorporated in contract drawings to account for
existing grotmd ~ater conditions which could accelerate corrosion.
ADDED COST:
EXTENSION OF TIME:
Item C
. .
$2,246.00
·o Calendar Days
The contractually specified system of waterproo~ing the south wall of Plant Water
Pump Station could not be applied based on the proximity" of the wall of Lindstrom
Tunnel (a District responsibility) and the method of supporting this tunnel (a
Contractor responsibility). A revised waterproofing system was appr~ved by the
Districts utilizing Perrnapol 305. This ch,mge order l'epresents the Districts'
portion of the additional costs.
ADDED.COST:
EXTENSION OF TIME:
Item D
$2,055.00
0 Calendar Days
The Aeration Roof Tank drains were revised from non-traffi~bearing units, originally
specific'-\ to Josrun Series 23510 roof drains.· These slabs are designed for vehicular
traffic loads and this change was issued to reconcile the specification error.
ADDED COST:
EXTENSlON OF TIME:
. ".D-1" .~GE~·JD,~. -IT~M f9(c) -.~LL .DIST~ICTS
$ 657 .00
· 0 Calendar Days
"D-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of 4
CHANGE ORDF.R GRANT NO. ___ c_-_o_6_-_10_7_3_-1_4_o ______ _
C. O. NO. 6
-----------~------~-----CONTRACTOR: H. C. Smith Construction Company
------------~--~~-------------------
DATE _________ s_e_p_t_c_m_b_e_r~2 _6 _, _1_9_7_9 __ __
JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Trea.tment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6
Item E ..
This changed work consisted of added costs to add reinforced concrete decks to nir
plenwn openings in Purge Air Fan Rooms/Kennison Tunnel in four locations. These
decks were o~ittcd in original contract drawings and added to contrnct per Supple-
mentary Drawing SD-C-7.
ADDED COSTS:
EXTENSION OF TIME:
Item F
$2., 861. 00
0 Calendar D~ys
Necessary fittings were installed in plant ··water. feeder lines to enable the Districts
to install piping for flushing the sewage air relief valves. These connections were
not incorporated in original contract drawings but are necessary to provide .for
extension of required piping for plant operations of these relief valves.
ApDED COSTS:
EXTENSION OF TIME:
Item G-
$1, 343. 00
0 Calendar Days
Relocated discharge headers for. P2-23-6 (C-06-1073-140) dewatering system for
disposal into Clarifiers in lieu of original disposal into forebay of Foster
Booster Pumping Station. rhe discharge piping was located in west embankment
revision contract, awarded after P2-23-6., for widening and lining the Santa Ana
River Channel by Environmental· Management Agency. This change was issued to
coordinate abutting public works contracts.·
ADDED COSTS:
EX'fENSION OF TIME:
Item H
$1,518.00
0 Calendar Days
Revised electrical conduit sizes originally designed into P2-23-6 contract for
10 HP .electrical drive motors for purge air fans. Design performance analysis by
P2-23-2 contractor (C-06-1073-130) resulted in requirement for 30 .HP for these purge
air fans. This change was directed to accomodatc the increase in conduit sizes
for· increased horsepower rcqui rements of 30 HP motors.
ADDED COSTS:
EXTENSION OF TIME:
. $2, 305. 00
0 C.alcndar Days
f.:GEfm.~ ITEM f9(c) .-t\LL DISTPlCTS "n-,.," !.• '-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 3 of 4, · .
CHANGE ORDER GRANT No. ___ c_-_0_6-_1_0_7_3-_1_4_0~--~v
C. 0. NO. 6
--~------~----------DATE September 26, 1979
------:""~~----~--~---=~-----
CONTRACTOR: H. C. Smith Construction Company
~~----~~~~~~--~~---=-,,_,,,,;,,~-
JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No •. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6
Item I
Pressure manhole frame and cover not propcrl)' ident'i'fied as s.ame on Drawing 1-507
for Junction Box No. 2 which was depicted as s·tondard unit. This drawing omission
. was corrected by this change and represents the ad<led cost for 4iffercncc between
units.
ADDED COSTS:
EA"TENSION OF TIME:
.
$ 201. 00
0 Calendar Days
"Relocated existing electrical conduit installed under P2-23-2 contract and battery .
charger disconnect to allow· installation of new c;able tray from Distrubi tion Center "A"
to new Plant.Water Pump Station under P2-23-6. Lp.ck of contract interface evaluation
. resulted in interference between conduit entering end of P2-23-3 (C-06-1073-120)
·cable tray to be attached at the same end plate location.
ADDED COSTS:
EXTENSION OF TIME:
Item K
$ 949.00
0 Calendar Days
Deduct $287.00 from Change Order No. 5, Item D.
total $4,383.00.
Stated total $4,670.00, revised
CREDIT DUE ON OVERPAYMENT:
El'TENSION OF "Tllvlli: .
. ''!l-3" . . A~P!D!\ ·rrEr1 #9 ( c) -~·~LL. DISTRICTS .
.
$ (287.00) o Calendar Days
"D-3"
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 6127 -l08l1r• ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 4 of 4
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-140
C.O. N0. ___ 6 __________________ _
CONTRACTOR: H. C. Smith Construction Company DATE September 26, 1979
------~---~--~~~~~----
JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6
Contract Time Adjustments
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
O~~ginal Completion Date
Time Extension This C.O.
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
December 29, 1977
1000 Calendar Days
September 23, 1980
0 Calendar Days
· 118 Calendar Days
1118 Calendar Days
January 19, 1979
It is mutually agreed by both parties to this contract that by execution of
Change Order No. 6, all time extensions agreed· and allowed by Change Order.
No. I thru Change Order No. 6, inclusive, do adequately and fairly adjust
the contract completion time for the contract work.
Or.I g i na 1 C~ntract Price $ 30,670,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 407,518.00
This Cha.nge '(ADD) <~~~a~¥> $ 14, 521. 00
Amended Contract Price $ 31,092,039.00
Board authorization dat~: October 10, 1979 Approved:
H. C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION .COMPANY
.._;
By ------------C-o_n_t_· r_a_c_t-or'
.. ~Gtnn.~ ITEM #9 < c)
. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
Dy ____ ~--------------~--~~~---Ch i cf Engineer
!\LL DISTRICTS
· .
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG~ COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A ________________ _
c.o.· No. i V
CONTRACTOR: PASCAL & LUDWIG I INC. DATE~ _______ o_c_t_o_b_er __ 1_, __ 1_9_7_9 ________ _
Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at
JOB: ______ ~~-R_o_t~h~r.~o~ck __ o_u_t_f_a_l~l.__B~o_o~s~t_er.~._s_t~a_t_i~o_n~,~Jo~b __ N_o~·~J_-~3_-_l __ · ----------------~------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (>OeOU~ $ 2,142.51
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deducti~ns from the contract price ar~.hereby aRproved. ·
ADD:
l.
2.
After the job was bid~ it was decided to add extra
structure to the fuel tank supports for ·full
earthquake protection. (See· Contractor's letter
dated August 16, 1979 and· Districts' le~ter
dated September 10, 1979.)
Covers costs to the Contractor for revisions to the
engine cooling water piping which will provide
better access to the engine for maintenance.
TOTAL ADD
No extension of time for this change order.
·Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
·This Change (ADD) ~uom)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved:
$1,026.56
$1,115.95
$2,142.51
$ 247,225.00
$· 0.00.
$ 2,142.51
$ 249,367.51
' PASCAL & LUDWIG, .INC.
COUtffY SAfH TATI ON 01·srR I CTS OF
Orange County, California
·By ______ ~----~----~----~------By __ ~----~--------~--------~--
Contractor Chief Engineer
.,,E ~, .A~~NDA IftM #9(0) -~LL DISTRICTS "E II
:
RESOLUTION NO. 79-137
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. PW-078
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
coµNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND
ll·OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR RESTROOM FACILITIES FOR PERSONNEL
OFFICE AND OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM AND SHOWER FACILITIES,
JOB NO. P\41-078
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. t, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specif1:cations and contract documents
this d~y submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for
RESTROOM FACILITIES FOR PERSONNEL OFFICE AND OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM AND SHOWER
FACILITIES, JOB NO. PW-078 , are hereby approved and adopted;' and,
• Section 2. That the Secretary be authori~ed and directed to advertise for ..
\.,.I bids for.said work pursuant ·to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the Stat~ of California; and,
"F~'
Section 3: That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read ; and,
Section 4. ·That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief
Engineer be authorized and directed to open said.blds on behalf of the Boards of
D
0
irectors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
AGEND,~ I TE~1 f 9 ( E) J~LL· DISPHCTS . . ' .. .. ·.· . ·.·• "F"
''h" . :.]·
RESOLUTION NO. 79-138
APPROVING·PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. PW-068R
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS.OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANiTATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICA-
TIONS FOR REHAIHLITATION OF INCINERATOR NO. 2 AND RAM
TABLES AT HEADWORKS "C", JOB NO. PW-068R
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detail~d plans, speci.fications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for
REHABILITATION OF INCINERATOR NO. 2 AND RAM TABLES AT HEADWORKS "C", JOB NO. PW-068R,
are hereby approved and adopted; and,
.Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the
State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. ·That the Secretary of the Boards ·and Districts' Chief Engineer
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
AG~~DP IlEM #9(F) -·ALL DIST~ICTS •.. ~= --' •. . .-. Ill ~·. "G"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-139
AWARDING SPECIFICATION NO. R-001
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR REHABILITATION OF n~o (2) CLIMAX GAS
eNGINES, SERIAL NOS. 46129 AND 46161, SPECIFICATION
NO. R-001
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Districts have published-Notice Inviting Bids for Rehabilitation
of Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001,
in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety
Code, and on September 6, 1979, publ~cly opened and read all bids submitted; and,
WHEREAS, the sole bid received has. been eval~ated by the Districts' engineers
and the bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately sixty-five (65) percent;
and,
WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer submitted a written recommendation that said bid
be rejected; and,
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1979, Resolution No. 79-129, rejecting all bids and
authorizing the General Man.ager to negotiate a contract with Waukesha Engine
Servicenter, Inc, for said job, was adopted by the Boards of Directors.
NOW, THE~EFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, S, 6, 7 and·ll of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards
of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of a negotiated contract
be made to· Waukesha E.ngine Servicenter, Inc,. for Rehabilitation of Two (2) Climax
Gas ~ngines, Serial Nos, 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001, and the proposal
for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
~ ''H-1" .. A<JENDA ITEM #9CG) .... ALL DISTRICTS· "H-1" ....
Section 2. That the nego~iated contract for said Specification No. R-001 be
awarded to Waukesha Engineservice Center, Inc. in the amount of $56,522.00, in
accordance with their proposal and the terms and conditions of the specifications
therefor; and,
Section 3. That the ~eneral Manager is hereby authorize·d and directed to
enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work on behalf of the
Boards of Directors, pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract
documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979 •
. "H-2" . AGENDA ·ITEM. #9(G} .. AL.L DISTRICTS-"H-2" ·. . ... . . . . .• . . . . . . .~. : . · ..
•
RESOLUTION NO. 79-140
AWARDING JOB NO. PW-069-1
. A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR WET WEATHER CONTINGENCY PLAN AT COYOTE
CANYON SLUDGE PROCESSING SITE, JOB NO. PW-069-1 ..
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards
of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that· award of ·contract be made to
Sully-Miller Contracting Company for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon
Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, and the bid tabulation and proposal
submitted for said work ~re hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-069-1 be awarded to
Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the total amount of $187,186.00, in accordance
with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. '11lat the Chairman and S~cretary of District No •. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work
pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for: said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979 •.
·~
. "I"
. ; . . . : .
· .· ··: "r..E~'DJ\·\1Tc-·r·1 /}O(H) ·.'-/\.LL Dl~T 0 ICTS r l J -• • n L.. •. • • -· ' ' '-' • '
II I II
I '' .''
Jj J. IJ
• JOB NO. p:~-069-1
.. October 2, 1979
11:00 A.M.
Wet Weather Contingency P~an at
PROJEC.T TI'l'LE Coyote Canyon sludge Processing Site
-PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construction 6f earthwork A.C. ~avement, P.V.C.
lining, and other works.
BUDGET. AMOUNT $ -------ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 200,000.00
REMARKS ~--~~------.:--~--~----~~--~----------~__;,---------~-------
CON'l'RACTOR
i: :Sully-Mille~ Contracti~~ Company
Orange, CA ·
2. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
Azusa, CA
. . 3. Delio Construction Co. Inc •
Diamond Bar, CA
.4.
TOTAL BID
$187,186.00
$214,362.00
No Bid
I have reviewed tne proposals received for the above
project and recommend award to Sully-Miller Contracting
Company of Orange, CA,· in the bid amount of $187,186.00,
as the lowest· and best bid. ·
. II J"
~~.D~
Thomas M. Dawes
Senior .Engin~er
I concur with the above reconunendation
.to award Job No. PW-069-1.
II J"
.~
-~
• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
'..,.! September 26, 1979
018
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 540-2910.
(71.C) 962-2411
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
J. Wayne Sylvester
Ted Hofi;man
Bid Specification E-099, Generator Set
Sealed bids were opened at 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 25, 1979,
for furnishing and delivering one (.1) new skid mounted, diesel driven
generator set. This unit_ is to be used at the Coyote Canyon dump site
to provide lighting and ·power for the maintenance e~uipment.
The tabulations are as follows:
ITEM I
Generator Set
With Housing
ITEM I-A (Alternate).
Generator Set
Less Housing
"-"' Generator Equipment Co. $7,422.12 $6,627.12
Los Angeles
Equipment Service Co.
. Long Beach ·
7,968.02 7,626.70
. ,
Bolstad Sales & Service
San Pedro
Diesel Energy Systems
Huntington Beach
No -Bid
7,851.35
The staff recommends the award be made to.Generator Equipment Company,
low bidder, for Item I for their total bid of $7,~22.12 including sales
tax. The value of tpe housing will provide weatherproofing and vandal
protection.
The expenditure of funds for this purchase is listed in the Capital
outlay Rev: lv·ng Fund, Schedule "B" (Non-Grant Funded Projects), Item 1-h.
Toy~bu e this section is $200,000.
'\L£
Ted Hof
Chief of
TH/yh
A;~~~
& Property
w. ·N. Clarke, Superintend~nt
. . . ~ . . . . :· : •, . . . ...
\
II!( II . ·~GE~IlA ITEM #9(1) -~ALL DI~TPICTS "K"
•
RESOLUTION NO. 79-141
ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REI~1BURSEMENT FOR
·EXPENSES OF RETIHED DIRECTOR DONALD \VINN' S
REPRESENTATION IN CASA
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF·
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,. ESTABLISHING
COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF
RETIRED DIRECTOR DONALD WINN'S REPRESENTATION IN
THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES
THROUGH THE ANNUAL 1980 MEETING
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, retired Director Donald Winn has previously been active in the
County Sanitation Districts·of qrange County's participation in the California·
Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA); and,
WHEREAS, retired Director Donald Winn is presently serving as a member of
the CASA Board of Directors; and,
WHEREAS, said term on the CASA Board of Directors will not expire until
the close of the CASA Annual Conference in August, 1980.
NOW, 'IHEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County· sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the continued representation of retired Director Donald
Winn,in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies through said
Association's Annual Work Conference in August, 1980, is hereby approved; and
that during said period, Donald Winn shall be entitled to receive the. sum of
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day, but in no event shall the representative's total
compensation exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month; and,
Section 2. That when traveling on such business, said representative
shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the course
"L-1" AGEND:~ ITEM t~9(K) (2).
... ·. . ... · .. ·. • ..
.~LL .DISTRICTS "L-1"
.. . .
0
of said travel in accordance with the following schedule:
:Conunerical Transportation -per actual invoice
Hotel -room rate per actual statement.for occupany
Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee
Ground Transportation -as itemized
Personal Vehicle First 1-150 miles per month @ $.15/mile
-Next 151-600 miles per m.onth @ $.12/mile
Next 601+ miles per month @ $.06/mile
Telephone Service -as itemized
Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -Act~al cost of the representative's
personal meals and incidentals required-during the course of the
conference or meeting.
Section 3. That the authorization provided for by this resolution shall
expire after CASA's Annual Work Conference in August, 1980.
\..,,! ··. · ·.' ·· PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
·"t-2" "L-2"
"N"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-150
APPROVING PURCI JASE AND SALE AGREEMENT RE
DISTRICT PROPERTY WITH H/\RBOR llOULEV/\RD
INVESTMENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND
6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF DISTRICT
PROPERTY IN 'IHE VICINITY OF HYLAND AVENUE
TO HARBOR.BOULEVARD INVESTMENT·GROUP, A
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Districts are owners of certain real.property located westerly
of Harbor Boulevard and northerly of Sunflowe~ Stree~ in the City of Costa Mesa; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts own·and maintain underground trunk sewer lines and
facilities with the properties which it owns; and,
·WHEREAS, the Pistricts have received·an offer to purchase its fee interest .in
said property at the fair market value reserving unto said Districts an easement
for sewer line purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1
and 6 ~f Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement between Harbor Boulevard Investment
Group, a Limited.Partnership, and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6, a~ sellers,
for the sale of approximately 4, 100 square fe.et,-as more particularly described and
shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution,
of real property owned by the Districts for the sum of $24,500.00 and reserving an
easement for the same area to the Districts, as recommended by the Districts'
General Manager and General Counsel, is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into and sign ·the agreement with said buyers, together with all other documents
necessary to cffect,said transaction, subject to approval of form and content by the
Districts' General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at:a,;r:-egttlar meeting held October 10, 1979 •
. . AGE~DA ITEM.#9(M)(2) -DISTPICTS 1 & 6 "N"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-151
AUTIIORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED OF DISTRICT
PROPERTY TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT
FROM HARBOR BOULEVARD INVESTMENT GROUP, A LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
-COUNTY .SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT
DEED OF DISTRICT PROPERTY TO HARBOR BOULEVARD INVEST-
MENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AUTI-IORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM HARBOR BOULEVARD
INVESTh1ENT GROUP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RE TRUNK SEWER
LINE IN TI-IE VICINITY OF HYLAND AVENUE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .
WHEREAS, TI-IE Boards of Directors have approved an agreement with Harbor
Boulevard Investment Group, a Limited Partnership, to sell certain real property
owned by the Districts consisting of approximately 4,100 square feet in exchange
for payment of the swn of $24,500.00 to Districts and reserv~ng an easement to
Districts for sewer line purposes in the same parcel • . . .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
and 6 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'Ibat the Chairman and Secretary of District ~o. 1, acting for itself
and on behalf o~ District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute the
necessary Grant Deed conveying the Districts'.i~teres~ to Harbor Boulevard Investment
Group, a Limited Partnership, in that certain real property des_cribed and shown on
Exhibits ·"A" and "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, upon
completion and satisfaction of all terms and conditions of that purchase and sale
agreement with Harbor Boulevard Investment Group; and,
Section 2. That the certain Grant of Easement dated , wherein
~--~~~~~~
an easement in the vicinity of Hyland Avenue, for s~nitary sewer purposes, is granted
to County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6, is hereby accepted from Harbor Boulevard
Investment Group, a Limited Partnership; and,
""0-1" DIST~ICTS ·1 ~' 6 "0-1"
Section 3. That the Secretary of the Boards ·of Directors of County Sanitation
·~ Districts Nos. 1 and 6 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement
in the official records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
-· .·
. ' "0-2" "0-2"
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AV~NUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE. ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_A~--------~--~-
V C.O. N0. ____ 1 __________ ~--~--
CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS·, INC •. DATE ________ ~o_c_t_o_b_e_r __ l~, __ 1_97_9 ________ _
OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 00.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes ·in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME
•.
The Contractor requested a delay in starting
construction, adequate time.for drying of the
river bed. The delay did not cause the District
problems and avoided closure of the Santa Ana
River Reg~onal Bike Trail during the peak SUiml1er ·
season. Contract is hereby granted an extension of
TOTAL TIME EXTENION
96 Calendar Days
96 Calendar Days
· ..... SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
. Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
. Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
April 26, 1979
60 Calendar Days
June 24, 1979
96 Calendar Days
96 Calendar Days
. 156 Calendar Days
September 28, 1979
Original Contract Price $ 189,970.00
Prev. Auth. Change5 $ 0.00 ..
This Change ~ ~-Oh'VUM) $ 0.00
Amended
Board authorization date: o t b 10 1979 c o er ,
JOHN A. 1\RTUKOVICH SONS, INC.
·By
--~------~--~----------~~~---
Contractor
. :·.
11pu .. ·f\·Gc~.tDl\ .I·T·E· t1 :,_~g .(N) L., . .. .1 i •.
Contract Price $ 189,970.0b
Approved:
COUlffY SJ\t.J I TAT I ON DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By __ ~~------------------~--~----
Chief Engineer
. ~
!llSTP.lCT 2 "P"
•
RESOLUTION NO. 79-152-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT.NO. 2-SR-l AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR,
CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING
FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., has completed
the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR,
CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-1, on September 28, 1979; and.,, . .
Section·2. That by letter, Lowry and Associates, District's engineers, has
· recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the
terms ~f the contract; and,
~ Section 3. '11lat the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred with said
engineer'·s recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 4. That Contract No. 2-SR-l is hereby.ac~epted as complete in
accordance with the terms.of the contract therefor, dated April 26, 1979; and, . .
Section S. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and
directed to e~ecute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John A. Artukovich Sons,
Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Olive Sub-Trunk Repair,
Contract No. 2-SR-l, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
~.G~~.!DA. IT~f1 #(o) -DI ST~I CT 2
·• .· ''Q"
'"S.-1"
•
RESOLUTION NO. 79-154-2
· APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF BREA RE
ANNEXATION AND DEFERMENT OF FEES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ANNEXATION
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF BREA AND PROVID-
ING FOR THE DEFERMENT OF FEES
WHEREAS, the City of Brea has requested annexation of certain property
consisting of approximately 190 acres of inhabited territory; and;
WHEREAS, the property which is the subject of the proposed annexation, is
developed with approximately 276 connections to the District's sewer system .
located in the Carbon Canyon area within the. limits of ttie City of Brea; and,
WHEREAS, the City wishes to have the connected proper.ties continue to
receive service through the District's facilities and is therefore in the process of
fbrming an assessment district for the purpose of financing a sewage collector·
system to service the subject property and in order to pa.y. annexation fees and
connection fees; and,
WHEREAS, the District Board has, on ~une 13,-1979, previously authorized
the District to enter into an agreement with the City of Brea, to provide
deferment of sewer service charges in the Carbon .Canyon area.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOL VEs DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That certain agreement between the City of Brea, a municipal
corporation, and the County Sanitation District No. 2 providing for the payment
of annexation and connection fees on a deferred basis, is hereby approved.
Sectio~ 2: That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute
.·,~GE~JD,L\ ITEM t.~9(Q) -DIST~ICT 2
.. ·
"S-1"
·~'.S-2"
said· agreement on behalf of itself in. form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND· ·ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 10th day of
October, 197~~
. .
..
.·
.. .
.·
~~G~MDA. ITEf1 #9(Q~ ~ ·n.IST~ICTS 2 ·... ·>
... · ...
~ ..
,,. .
"S-?" ~ -
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 1 of J
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A __ ~------~------
C .O. N0·~---1~~~~-----~--~~
CONTRACTOR: .... JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. DATE ____ ~ ___ o_c_t_o_b_c_r~l_,~1_9_7_9 __ ~~---
JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CO~TRACT NO. 3-20-4
------------------------------~--------------------------------------~----------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~) $ . 95,849.62
In accordance wi~h contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensati9n therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
In acco~dance with Section 10-4, subsection b.2.A., of the
General Provision and Standard Specifications, the Contractor
is to perform the following extra work.
l.
2 .•
Install a variable thickness asphalt overlay on Knott
Avenue between Orangethorpe Avenue and Fullerton Creek
Channel in accordance with City of Buena Park.rQquest.
The work shall include removal of approximately 4340
square feet of existing deteriorated asphalt concrete
and Lase material; pa.tching 4340 square feet of pavement;
scraping existing pavement at curb to accept new overlay;
placement of a seal coat; placement of approximately 780
to~s of asphaltic concrete; raising of manholes and water
valve covers; installation of traffic loops; traffic
control; all in accordance with District specifications
and instructions; for lump sum ·
Install a sand slurry seal coat over existing roadbed,
Fullerton Creek Channel to Artesia Boulevard; for lump sum
3. Additional cost to install one fiberglass manhole instead
of a PVC lined concrete.manhole, for evaluation by District;
for lump sum
4.
5.
·6.
Install protective coating on ten (10) Distridt manholes,
including surface preparation for lump swn
Replace electrical conduit not.shown on plans, in kind,
for lump sum
Change in sewer siphon under Fullerton Creek Channel to
include full encasement with reinforced concrete; for lump sum
7. Additional cost for installation and maintenance of traffic
control delineat9rs, sign"s and striping on Artesia Boulevard
at Santa Ana Freeway in accordance with Cal' Trans and
District instructions, for lump sum
.._..i a. Additional cost to manufacture and install spe~ial closure
section at Rostrata Avenue to fit field condition at jobs
terminun, for lump sum
DISTrICT 3
$52,578.67
22,000.00
1,500.00
10,752.50
328.90
3,890.74
1,023.36
2,522.64
"T-1"
..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P • 0 • 13 0 X 8 1 2 7 -1 0 8 '• L• E LL I S I\ VE 1'1 U E
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of S
CHANGE ORDER NA GRANT N0·------~--~------1~
C. 0. NO. 1 ------------------------DATE __ ~--~-o_c_t_o_b_e_r~l_, __ 1_9_7_9 ____ ~ CONTRACTOR:
--------~~----~~----~~------~-
JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC.
9.
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4
Cost to remove the sides and deck of a reinforced
concrete box at Knott Avenue and Eighth Street, for
lump sum
~OTAL ADD:
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME
The Contractor is granted an extension of time for the following
work items:
1. For .delays covered by the relocation of the San Diego
Pipeline Co. gas transmission main:
2. For delays caused by the relocation of the Southern
California Edison electrical duct servi.ng the Kraft
Company plant:
3. Additional time required for extra work, th~s change
order:
·4. For rainy ~eather (4 days) and s~~ggy weather· (2 days):
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
.. • .. ; . . . . · .
"T-2" . ,~GENDA. "i'fE}~ ft9 < R) ~. DI STJU CT 3
1,252.81
$95,849.62
10 calendar days
~ 15 calendar days
64 calendar days.
6 calendar days
95 calendar days
"T-2"
".,_,/
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P • 0. B 0 X B 1 2 7 -1 0 8 l1 lf ELL I S I\ VENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
Page 3 of 3
CHANGE ORDER
'
GRANT NO. __ ~N_A~~-----
C.O. NO. i
----~------~-----CONTRACTOR.: __ J_O_H_N_A_._A_R_T_u_K_o_v_I_C_H_s_o_N_s_,_I_N_c_. ___ _ 0 ATE October 1, 1979
~---------__....;~-~----
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTR?\CT NO. 3-20-4
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
·original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
·.Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised ~ompletion Date
.Board authorization date: October 10, 1979
JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC.
~--~-----~~~Contractor"
Or.i g i na 1
December 28, 1978
180 Calendar Days
June 25, 1979
95 Calendar Days
·95 Calendar Days
275 Calendar Days
September 28, 1979
Contract Price $ L472,450 •. 00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Cha.nge (ADD) (IX~x) $ 95,849.62
Amended Cori tract Price $ 1,568,299.62
Approved:
COUNTY S/\N I Tiff I ON DISTRICTS of
Ornngc County, California
Dy
----~~------~--~...______,~~ C h i c f E 11 ~J i n c e r
"11 t~ 3" · AG~NDA Ii~M #9(R) -DISTRICT 3 "T-3"
..... · ..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
. . .
CHANGE' ORDER GRANT NO. NA
--------------------~-c. 0. NO. 2
--------------------~----CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS·, INC. · DATE _________ o_c t_o_b_e_r __ l_, __ 1 _9_79 ____ ~---
JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH 8, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4
--------------~--~~~~--~----~----~--~--------~---------~------------
·Amount of this Change Order (1'.ntij (DEDUCT) $ 131.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes ·in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the foJlowing
~dditions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT.OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
DEDUCT:
Item Change Est'd Quantities
No.· Unit Description 1'.,rom To Difference
10. EACH Utility beams 2 0 2 @ 350/EACIL $ 700.00
12. C.Y. Encasement Cone. 50 2 48 @ 60/C.Y. 2,880.00
13. : ·r..F. Median curb 9,020 8,934 86 @ ~.50/L.F. 301.00
Total Deduct: $3, 881. 00 . ..
\w) ADD:
·9. L.F. House laterals 75 153 78 @'25/L.F. $1,950.00
11. : EACH ·support walls 3 9 6 @ 300/EACH 1,800.00
Total Aq~: $3(750.00
TOTAL DEDUCT: $ 131.
0
00
..
Original Contract Price $ 1,472,450.00
Prev. Auth. Chunge:; $ 95,849.62
This Change· 6ft}{j{) (DEDUCT) $ (131. 00)
Amended Contract Price $ 1,568,160.62
Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved:
,,
JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orungc County, California
vi
·By
------------~----------~-------By---------~-----------------------
Contractor Chief Engineer
'~.u~' AGE~DA ITEM #9Cs) -DIST~ICT 3 . . . "U"
"V"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-155-3
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
3-20-4 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * ~ * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., has completed
the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, REACH
8, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-4, on September 28, 1979; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's
~ngineers, has reconunended acceptance of said work as having.been completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract; and, .
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said
e.ngineer' s recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 4. That Contract No. 3-20-4 is hereby accepted as complete in accord-
ance with the ter~s of the contract therefor, dated De·cember 28, 1978; and,
Section 5. That the District's Chief Engineer is h~reby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John A. Artukovich Sons,
Inc. ~etting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Knott Interceptor,
Reach 8, Contract No. 3-20-4, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7, That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District,
in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
. ~ .. : ;
. • ~GE~m.~ ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT 3 "V"
. .
"W-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-156~3
AU1HORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH.CITY OF
BUENA PARK TO INCORPORATE CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS
IN ORANGETHORPE AVENUE INTO CONTRACT FOR ORANGETHORPE
RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-22-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DI.RECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTiiORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
BUENA PARK TO INCORPORATE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY STREET
IMPROVEMENTS IN ORANGETHORPE AVENU~ INTO CONTRACT FOR
ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-22-2
* * * * * * * * •.• * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the District, as part of its Master Plan of Trunk Sewers, proposes
to construct an extension of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer from the existing
terminal at Western Avenue easterly to Thomas Street; and, ·
WHEREAS, the City of Buena Park has entered into a contract for street
improvements to Orangethorpe Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Stanton Avenue; and,
WHEREAS, public inconvenience and cost can be minimized by construction of
said street improvements in that portion of Orangethorpe Avenue in which the proposed
Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer is to be installed by deleting said work from the
City's contract and including it in the District's Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer
job.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of. County Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Board· of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
hereby approves that certain agreement dated between County Sanita---------
tion District No. 3 at'ld the City of Buena Park to delete the portion of the City's
proposed street improvements in Orangethorpe Avenue that _will be interrupted by the
District's proposed construction of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer from the
City's current public works contract and to incorporate· said work into the District's
contract for construction of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 3-22-2, and providing for payment of the City's bid cost for said work to ~
the District; and,
AGEHD.~ ri~ #~Cu> -DisTRICT 3 "W-1"
. Section 2. That the Chairm~n and Secretary of the District are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the
District in form approved by the General Counsel.
P~SED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979 •
.. "W~2" ~GEM~A IJ~M #9Cu) ~ ·QISTRICT 3
..
I
"W-2"
CITY 0 F BUEN A P A R K
c A L F 0 R N A 9 0 6 2 0
6 6 5 O e E A C H B o U L E V A R o, P H O N E: (7 I 4) 5 2 I -9.9 o 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
Wiiiiam J. o•Neil, Director
September 18, 1979
~1r. Ray E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Lewis:
In respon'se to your letters of September 13, 1979, concerning the Knott Inter-
ceptor Project and the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer Project, the follow~ng
information is provided. Your proposal to sand slurry coat between Fullerton
Creek Channel and Artesia Boulevard has been accepted by the City Council,
agreeing to share equally the cost of the work with the Distr.ict.
Your proposal for the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer was generally agreed to
in principle.
The Council requests the District prepare a more formal agreement between the
Agencies, and that same be submitted for pur review. The Council wished to
include in the scope of the agreement the stipulation that City funds to be
paid to the District for resurfacing work would ·not be ·submitted to the District
until such time as they are actually needed to make payment on the project.
Very truly yours,
· ~1d./L°>k~
w1112::%. o 'Neil
"X"
Director of Engineering Services
and City Engineer
WJO:pf
"X"
-1,.,,.J
. 11y11·
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACI-I
September 25, 1979 ·
Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation D~stricts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
10844 Ellis Ave.
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
Dear Ray:
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
(714) 640-2221
The City of Newport Beach would like to request that the District
consider a joint project with the City·in connection with your .
current plan: to replace the sewer main in Bayside Drive. Along
the same -route as the District's sewer main, the City has an 18 11
•
and a 411 water line that are in need of immediate replacement.
Attached is a drawing showing the location of water lines in
relation to your sewer main. If funds are available tne City is
also considering the replacement·of the 6" A.C. line with 12 11 D.I.
It is pr9posed that the District would be the· contracting agency
with the City paying all of the cost of the water line and a
proportionate share of the administrati~e ·and engineering costs.
Sincerely,
\~'
JTD:bc
Attachment
'· cc: City Manager
Public Works Director
Cily Ilall 0 ~.3Q.O Ncwport.Boulcv~ird, Nc'''P(·>rt Beach, . .California 92G63
· :· ·'-AGENDi'},. ITE-r! ff.9(v) ~ DISTRICT 5 "Y"
...
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE" ORDER
..
GRANT NO. ___ NA ________________ __
v C.O. N0. ____ 2 __ ~------------~--
CONTRACTO~: ____ A_L_B_E_RT~W_. __ D_A_V_I_E_S~,_I_N_C_~-----------DATE ________ ~o~c_to_b_e~r;;;_;l~,r,.....;.1~9~7~9---------
JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT.NO. 5-21 --------------~~--~~~----~:...-~--~----------~-------~----------------~--
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) . (DEDUCT) $ o.oo
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensatio~ therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME
The work required under this contract was.closely
tied to the construction of the interim Santa Ana
River improvements"by the County EMA. The .
·contractor is granted a 25-day time extension .
caused by the late start of the EV.aA contractor.
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
. . : .
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Cont+act Time
Original Completion Date
_Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Original
May 24, 1979
90 Calendar Days
August 21, 1979
25 Calendar Days
30·Calendar Days
120 Calendar Day~
September 20, 1979
Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
• ..
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved:
$
$
$
$
25 Calendar ~ays
357,000.00
6,103.31
0.00
363,103.31
cournv SANITATION DI STR 1 CTS OF
Orange County, California
ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.
·By ______________ ~-----------------
Contrnctor
. ~ .. (" ·, : ~ .
"Z'' . ··p:GE~mp,. iTEM. ~~9(w)
Dy ____________ ._.. ____ ~~~--~----
DISTP.ICTS 5 g 6
Chief Engineer
11-Y II
L.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. OOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CH/',NGE ORDER GRANT NO. NA
---------------------~--c. o. N0. __ ~_3 __ ~~~~---------
CONTRACTO~: ALBERT w. DAVIES I INC. DATE ______ ~_o_c_t_o_b_e_r __ 1_,~1_97_9 ______ __
JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. 5-21
--------------~----~~------------------------------------------------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) · (0000~? $ 10,836.80
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are. hereby aP.proved.
ADi:J°USTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Item Ch~nge Est'd Qua~tities-
No. Unit Description From To · Difference
1 L.F. 42" v.c.P. 625 636.4. 11.4 @ 512/L.F. $ .. 5,836.80
5 EACH Delay in Const. 0% 50% 50% • @ 10, 000/EACH 5, 000. 00
TOTAL ADD: $10,836.80
Original Contract Price $ 357,000.00
Prcv. Auth. Changes $• 6,103.31.
This Change (ADD) (0000~1{) $ 10,836.80
Amended Contract Price $ 373,940.11
Board authorization date: October 10, 1979 Approved:
ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC •
...._;'
·By
------------~~----·----~--~---
Contractor
II AA"
cournY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By __ ~----------------~------~---
Chief Engineer
II P.A"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-157
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-21 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD.OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO~~IA, ACCEPTING
CONTRACT NO. 5-21 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING
FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange
County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Albert W-. Davies, Inc., has completed the
work in accordance with the terms of the contract for SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON,
CONTRACT NO. 5-21, on September 20, 1979; and,
Section 2, That by letter, L. D. King, Inc .. , Districts' engineers, has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in s·aid
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Contract No. 5-21 is hereby accepted as complete in accord-
ance with. the terms of the contract therefor, dated May 24, 1979; and,
Section 5. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is h~reby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6, That the Final Closeout Agreement with Albert W. Davies, Inc.
setting forth the terms· and conditions for acceptance of Santa Ana River Siphon,
Contract No. 5-21, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District
No, 5 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of
itself and County Sanitation District No. 6 in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED :\ND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
"BB"
. . . ~ .. .
.AGENDA ITEM #9Cv) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6
. ~ . . : ...
"BB"
..
"CC"
· .
RESOLUTION NO. 79-159-7
AUTHORIZING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND AGRE-
EMENT WITH ONE TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CA\_IFORNIA, AUTHORl2ING AN EN-
CROACHMENT PERMIT TO ONE TOWN CENTER DRIVE
ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE
WHEREAS, District presently has a subtrunk sewer facility in the vicinity
of Bristol Street and northerly of the San Diego Freeway; and,
WHEREAS, District's sewer facilities are located within an easement
.
across that certain property owned by One Town Center Associates, a Joint
Venture (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"); and,
WHEREAS, . Owner has constructed certain ~uildings, roadways and other
improvements upon its property which have been determined to encroach into
the District's easement area; and,
WHEREAS, the District and Owner wish to enter into an agreement:
reciting the respective rights and obligations of the parties relating to the
encroachment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distr'ict ·
No. 7 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That certain encroachment permit and hold harmless agreement
dated , 1979 between One Town Center Associates and District is -----
hereby approved.
Section 2: That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 be and is hereby authorized and directed to record said
agreement in the official records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 10th day of
October, 1979.
"CC"
"DD"
••
September 10, 1979
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: In-Plant Pipe.Inspection
Coast Trunk.Sewer, Reach 1 and 2
COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92
1
J
(71 .C) 5.C0-2910 ~
(71 .C) 962-2.C I 1
We have received proposals from Smith-Emery Company and Osborne
Laboratories, Inc. for subject work •. Proposals were requested
from Inspection Consultants and Twining Laboratories but not
received.
Rates for the work are summarized below:
Regular Charge
Overtime/Saturday
Sundays/Holidays
Travel Time
Mileage
Smith-Emery
$17.50/hr.
$22.SO/hr.
$26.50/hr.
0
0
Osborne
$17.50/hr.
$26.25/hr.
$26.25/hr.
Not Available
Not Available
Smith-Emery has performed satisfactorily ·on In-Plant inspection
for the Knott Interceptor and based on the past performance and
the above rates, r'"recommend Smith-Emery for the work.
TMD:ss
~' -~ "l1z,i . tQu.,,.,f.~ f-h~~as M. Dawes
Senior El).gineer
I·c9ncurwith the above recommendation for
Smith-Emery, t~~ per diem rates as specified
in an amount not to exceed $25,000.
AGE~~DA ITEM.·. #9(BB) -·~ISTRI.CT 11 "DD"
: i
. . I ~ . ;
"EE''
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. C. '3CX 8127. F"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"ORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF"F"-RAMP, SAN DIEGO F"REEWAY)
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
October 4, 1979
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for ~onstruction Consultation
Services in Connection with Construction of Coast Trunk Sewer
Job No. 11-13-2
.TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE ?14
540-2910
962-2411
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following
fee with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction consultation services in
connection with the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer:
Per diem rates as follow effective September 1, 1979 through
June 30, 1980:
Construction Manager
Chief Inspector
Construction Engineer
Mechanical & Electrical Inspector
Civil Inspector
Clerical
Total above fee not to exceed $25,000.00.
$45.00
35.50
33.75
23.50
21.00
11.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed, and that said fee will not result
in excessive profits .for the consultant.
Approved /s/ Fred A. Harper
· Fred A. Harper
/s/ Ron Pattinson
Ron Pattinson
Chairman, Selection Committee
General Manager . . .. .
AGENDA ITEM #9Ccc) Cll··-DI.STRICT 11 "EE"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-161-11
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BUTTER.ENGINEERING, INC.
FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE TUNNEL
INSPECTIONS ON CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER
ENGINEERING, lNC. FOR CONSTRUCTION.MANAGEMENT
SERVICES RE TUNNEL INSPECTIONS ON COAST TRUNK
SEWER, REACHES.I AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET
INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Boardsof Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing
procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with
Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services to assist staff in
inspection of the five tunnels to be constructed-in connection with the Co.ast Trunk \w)
Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue
Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee established pursuant to said procedures has
certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has
been approved by the General Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of.County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and
------------~---~---------
between County Sanitation District No. 11 and Butier Engineering, Inc. for construe-
tion management services to assist staff with inspection of the five tunnels to be
constructed in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of
Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2,
is hereby approved and accepted; _and,
"FF-1" · · · · AGHiD.i( ITEM #9(cc) (2) -··nISTRlCT 11 "FF-1"
Section 2. 111at payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement on a per diem fee
basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
"FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #9Ccc)C2) -DISTRICT 11 . . . ~ .. .. ' ...
"FF-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-162-11
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITI1 KEITH
AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF COAST TRUNK SE\~ER,
REACHES 1 AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTER-
CEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 11-13-2, RE CONSTRUCTION STAKING SERVICES FOR
SAID PROJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH KEITH
AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACHES
1 AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER
AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO.-11-13-2,
PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING SERVICES IN CONNECTION
WITH SAID PROJECT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, has heretofore entered into an agreement with Keith and
Associates for design of Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland
Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Keith and
Associates to provide for construction staking services necessary in connection with
said project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of ~ounty Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 to that certain agreement dated November 10,
1976, by and between County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County and
Keith and Associates~ P!oviding for construction staking services necessary in
connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street
Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That an increase in the payment provision for services,on a per
diem fee basis, is hereby authorized from a maximum fee of $121,000 to $198,000 for
said work.
'~Gfr-1" _AGENDA ITEM #9(on) -···DISTRICT 11 "GG-1"
'·
•
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
\...,I authorized and directed to execute said addendum in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
AGEND.~ lTEM #9(no) -···DISTRICT il "GG-2"
::
:I:: .::c .._.
. -
OPERi\TING
~(:n·.
rt1 ->· ..::-t=j·
:l:::o
.......
~-rn: -• .;.:a
·-.c_ ...........
~ ·_.VJ
EXPEXDITIJRES & APPR9PRIATIONS
Appropriation ",for Contingencies
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
LESS AVAILABLE FUNDING
Subvent.ions
Transfer From ACO Fund
TOTAL:AVAILABLE Flf?l.'DING
... >
j-·· ANTICIPATED TAX ALLOCATION
r-~ ...
t::::J ··'
(:;; ACCUi-tULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
--i :.v EXPENDITURES & APPROPRIATIONS
.......c·.
~ Unappropriated Reserves
(/') .
. ::
Transfer to _Operating Funds
Appropriation for District
Facilities Improvements and
Extensions
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
LESS AVAILABLE FUNDING
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
A.\'TICIPATED TAX ALLOCATION
·.
~ TOTAL TAX INCREASE INCLUDING SUBVENTIONS
:: ·c
·.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS
REVISIONS TO LINE ITEMS
1979-80 FISCAL YEAR
D I S T R I C T
TOTAL 1 2 3 5
702,833 277,266 317,973
702,833 -0-277,266 317,973 -0-
125,212 7,945 36,826 44,954 6,123
(222"., 184) (60,093) (39,830)
( 96,972) (52,148) . 36,826 44,954 (33,i07)
799,805 52,148 240,440 273,019 33,707
I
•
99,923 60,093 39,830
(222,184) (60,093) (39,830)
.
122,261
-0--0--0--0--0-
-0-·-0--0--o--0-
-0--0--0--0--0-
:
925,017 60,093 277,266 317,973 39,830
(
6 7 11
107,594
-0-107,594 -0-
3,875 13,670 11,819
(23,654) (98,607)
(19, 779) 13,670 (86,788)
19,779 93,924 86,788 oe
-·
..
(23,654) (98,607)
..
23,654 98,607
-0--0--0-
-0--o--0-
-0--0--C-
' ...
23,654 .107,594 98,607
(
~'H"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-149
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20
(POSITIONS ANU SALARIES)
A JOINT·. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COuNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l~ 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO.
79-20, AS AMENDED
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby,
further amended to add the following position clas~ification thereto:
EXHIBIT "B-1"
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
Position Authorized Range
Class{fication Classification Personnel ·No.
10315 Personnel Analyst 1 lOSSG
Hourly
8.60/10.70
Approximate
Monthly
Equivalent
Salary
1491/1855
Section 2. That the first paragraph of Section 7 of Resolution No. 77-166,
as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows:
"The current .organizational chart of County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit "C", and dated
October, 1979, Revised, is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution."
Section 3. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that
conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and,
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective· October 11, 1979.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1979.
. ·:··· AGEtJDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "II"
RESOLUTION NO.
ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR 1979-80 FISCAL YEAR
PURSUANT.TO ORDINANCE NO.
A RESOLUTION OF Tiffi BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR CLASS I
AND CLASS II PERMITTEES FOR THE 1979-80 FISCAL
YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Ordinance No.
an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use Of District Sewerage Facilities; and,
WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall annually
adopt a charge for use of District facilities by Class I and Class II permittees.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to Section 302.6 of Ordinance No. I the
~ .
1979-80 fiscal year charge for use for Class I permittees is hereby establfshed
as fOll?WS:
For Flow: $ .per million gallons of flow
For Suspended Solids: $ per thousand pounds of S.S.
For Biochemical Oxygen Demand: $ per thousand pounds of B.O.D.
Section 2. That pursuant to Section 30Z.6.of Ordinance No. I the
1979-80 fiscal year charge for use for Class II permittees is hereby established
as follows:
· . For Flow: $ .per million g~llons of flow ----
"PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Octobe~ ~O, 1979 .
. ,
~II JJ II · .. ~.GENI':~ JTEM #15 P..LL DISTRICTS II '-1.J II
' ....
. ---··-~
The Baldwin Company
Cra/t:;manship in building since 19.'i6
16811 Hale Aven\,\e, Irvine, California 92714 • Telephone (714) 540-8300
September 21, 1979
Mr. Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
County Sanitation District of Orange
County, California
c/o Rourke & Woodruff
1055 North Main Street
Santa Ana, California
Subject: Proposed Annexation No. 82 -Tract No~ .9606 to County
Sanitation District No. 7
Dear Mr. Woodruff:
Confirming our September 20, 1979 telephone request and my conversation with
Mr. Ray Lewis, this is an officiaL request on behalf of The Baldwin Company
for permission to enter into a def erred payment agreement for the Annexation
No. 82 acreage fees; and, for a conditional reimbursement agreement for the
"island parcels" within the Tract 9606 boundaries.. The requested deferral ·
date on acreage fees is June 30, 1980.
The Baldwin Company further request that it be reimbursed for fees paid for
the island parcels not within its ownership if, within five (5) years, owners
of these properties pay acreage fees and connect to District facilities.
The Board of Directors of District No. 7 authorized initiation of proceedings
in connection with this annexation on May 9, 1979. ·Proceedings have been
held in abeyance pending receipt of the required fees. Because of un-
anticipated delays in the recording of the first planned.final tract maps,
loan proceeds allocated to the acreage fee payments are not yet available.
We understand that as a concession for allowing the annexation proceedings to
continue, an interest bearing note may be required by the District. An up-
dated title report and legal description for the property will be delivered
to you from First American by September 25, 1979.
We would appreciate your earliest attention to this request so that agreements
might be presented to the Board at the October 10, 1979 meeting.
Yours very truly,
Philip Bettencourt
Consultant to The Baldwin Company
cc: Mr. J. Wayne SY-lvester\~
Nr. Ray Lewis ) v; Io attachments
~.· Mr. Jim Baldwin·:.·~··. ·).·~: ... '.': .
"KK" . ·.·AGENDA ITEM #29(A) ~DISTRICT 7· "KK"
'~M~·1-l"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-160-7
APPROViNG AGREEMENT WITH BALDWIN BUILDERS
FOR DEFEHMl:.NT OF ANNEXATION FEES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF. DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
WITH BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR THE DEFERMENT OF
ANNEXATION FEES
WHEREAS, the District has by Resolution No. 79-63-7, adopted May 9,
1979, approved the initiation of annexation proceedings for 156.9 acres of
uninhabited territory; and,
WHEREAS, in connection with said annexation proceedings, Baldwin
Builders as the owner/developer, has requested a deferral of the payment of the
annexation fees until June 30, 1980; and,
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of said deferral of fees, the Baldwin
Builders as owner/developer, has agreed.to execute a promissory note secured by .
deed of trust on the subject property, which prop~rty is generally described as·
Tentative Tract No. 9606, located in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and . .
Newport Boulevard, in the County of Orange; and, ·
WHEREAS, in conjunction with this annexation, three separate parcels of
property are s~own on the Tentative Tract 9606 as be "NOT A PART" thereof,
but which parcels are required to be included .within th~ annex~tion to the
District; and,
WHEREAS, Baldwin Builders as owner/developer, has agreed to pay the
a~nexation fees for each of the three properties not included within the legal
description of Tentative Tract No. 9606, together with the annextion fees for
Lot No. 199, which is owned by the Corporation of the President of the Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, subject to an
agreement by District to reimburse the developer for fees advanced on said
i~GE;.J!J/\ ITEM #-29 < c) ~ .. DI ST~ I CT 7 . : . . . . "t~~~1-l"
parcels in the event said properties subsequently connect to the District's
sys~em.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
.No. 7 of Orange County, California,
"MM-2"
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That certain agreement between Baldwin Builders, a California
corporation, and County Sanitation District No. 7, providin_g for the payment of
annexation fees, deferral thereof, and reimbursement for certain portions of said
fees is hereby approved.
Section 2: The Chairman and Secretary. of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute
said agreement on behalf of itself in a form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 10th day of
October, 1979.
,
"MM-2"
(
su~~'-'.ARY OF THE GANN INITIATIVE--PROPOSITiON 4
PROPOSED ARTJ.GLE XIII-B CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
The Limitations
[Sec. l] The total annual ap-
propriations of the state or any
entity of local governmant ·shall.
not exceed the appropriations · -
limit of the prior year. subject
to adjustments for CQSt of living
and population and as provided
in Sect ion 3.
The Interpretation
[Sec. 3) (c) The appropriations limit may be exceeded ln an 11 emergency
provided that the excess appropriation for any year is offset by reducing
appropriations limits in the following three years.
[Sec. 5) (sentences 2 and 3) Withdrawals from or interfund transfers
between the funds permitted by Section 5, are not appropriations sub-
ject to limitation. but contributions from proceeds of taxes are
appropriations subject to limitation.
[Sec. 6J The state may, but need not provide a new subvention to local
government for(') the cost of mandates requested by the local agency,
(11 ) costs related to definition or redefinition of crimes, or(''')
mandates enacted before 1975 or to implement legislation enacted before
1975. S~ction S(a) and 8(b} clarify that any of these new subventions,
if given, will count as part of the state !P.l!!.Qpriations subject to
limitation, but not as·part of the local !21!!£1!riations subject to limi·
tat ion ..
( ~-~.{
,. I
The Implcmentatio.n
[Sec. 11] This Article will become
effective July 1, 1980.
[Sec. 2] Revenues received in ex-
cess of appropriations permitted by
this Article shall be returned through
revisions of tax rates or fee sched-
ule within th~ two following fiscal
years.
[Sec. 8] (h) For 1978/79 the !2:
propriations limit shall be the
total of the appropriations su~
ject to 1 imitation for 19787~
~this makes 1978/19 the bench mark
for measuring subsequent changes
in appropriations). All state sub·
ventions for 1978/79 are deemed lo
have been derived from proceeds of
'I ) ...
[Sec. 3] specifies adjustments:
(a) if government entities trans·
fer financfal responsibility they
shall agree on a corresponding
transfer of a" ro riations limit,
(b 1 ) if the transfer 15 to a pr -
vate entity. the appropriations
limit shall be lower "accordingl~."
and Cb'') if there is a change in
the source of revenue from which
government services are pro-
vided, so as to use license or
[Sec. 7) This Article is not to imeair the ability of state or local
government to "meet its obligations' toward bonded indebtedness. !!.ill·
user fees instead of other reve·
nues. the appropriations limit
shall be lowered "accordingly."
[Sec. 4J Appropriations limit
may be set for any new govern-
ment entity or changed for any
existing entity by vote of tho
el~ctors. The vote is effective
for not more than four years.
(Sec. 5] Each entity may estab-
lish contingency. unemployment.
reserve, retirement. sinking fund,
trust or similar funds it deems
11 r:?asonable.11
[Sec. 6) If the state mandates
a new program or higher level of
service by local government, it
shall provide a new subvention
of funds to reimburse ih~ costs.
[Sec. 8] (a) State appropriations subject to limitation mean any authori-
zation to expend during a fiscal year the state proceeds of taxes except
for the purposes of(') present subventions to local government, (1 ') tax
refunds, and(''') payments from retirement, unemployment. and disability
insurance funds. (b) Local appropriations subject to limitation·mean any
authorization to expend during a fiscal year the local procoeds of taxes
and present state subventions, excepting only refunds of taxes. (c) Proceeds
of taxes means all tax revenues; all proceeds from regulatory licenses, user
charges, and user fees in excess of the 11 costs reasonably borne 11 by the re·
ceiving entity is providing the regulation. product or service; and proceeds
from the investment of tax revenues. ·
[Sec. 9J A ro riations sub'ect to limitation do not include (a) debt
service. (b appropriations essential to comply with court and federal
mandate~, (c') appropriations of any special district whose ad valorem
tax levy in 1977/78 did not exceed $0.125/$100A.V.1 and (11 ) appropria·
tions ~f any special district which is totally tunded by other than the
proceeds of taxes.
[Sec. OJ (g) Debt service means interest and redemption charges. including
required reserve and sinking fund deposits. on indebtedness existing or
legally authorized as of January 1 1 1979, or on bonded indebtedness subse-
quently voted by the electors.
[Sec. SJ (e) Cost of living means the CPI, U.S. Dept. of Labor. but the
yea·r-to-year increase in cost of. 1iving shall not exceed tho change in
California par c~pita person~l inc~me •.
Prepared August 1979 by
BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES
Municipal Financing Consultants
100 Bush Street
San franc1sco, California 94104
..
, .
. . .
-·
. "-"
..
THE GANN INITIATIVE
AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
·. By Raymond K. O'Neil, Vice President
Bartle Wells Associates I
Municipal Financing Consultants
San Francisco
Prepared for California Association of
Sanitation Agencies
Annual Work Conference
August 24, 1979 ' .
On Nov~mber 6, 1979, Californians who go to the polls will vote on
"Proposition 4, Limitation of Government Appropriations." That is the
official ballot title for the Gann Initiative which was successfully cir-
culated by a group calling itself the "Spirit of 13_, Inc."
Between now and November there will be a lot of publicity on Proposi-
tion 4. Its proponents will promote Proposition 4 as a logical and nec-
essar~y complement to Proposition 13 which passed 17 months· earlier.
Proposition 13 restricts the inflow of revenues from property taxes;
Proposition 4 restricts the outflow of government funds through the ·ap-
propriation process.
Note that alt~"i.ough the two propositions are spiritually related, they
· .. function very differently. Proposition 13 assaults government spendin;;r
from the rear, by cutting one supply route--property taxes. It offered
an immediate and large bonanza to those voters who happened to own
property, but it did not reduce other forms of taxation. Proposition 4
assaults government spending from the front by restricting its rate of
advance. It offers no bonanza, and restricts taxation only indirectly
through the budgetary process of matching income to a restricted amount
of expenditures. · ·
The spiritual semblance can be seen, however~ in several ways. Neither
proposition attempts to as~mre a continuity of public service; neither
leaves much legislative discretion in ~atching the level of service to
social . needs or turns of the economy; neither places any importance on
renewing and replacing public facilities for .the benefit of ·future genera-
tions. They are united in being anti-government and anti-tomorrow.
But these philosoplical attitudes are not the focus of this paper. Nor
do I want to r.pecnlate on whether or not Proposition 4· will. pass. Rather
I want to focus on how Proposition 4, if passed, would affect those re-
sponsible for serving the publ~c; That's not an easy .job .
"f' • 1
Each person who rccids the ·proposition will read it throufJh his own
eyes--some as disgruntled taxpayers, son:ie more silently as satisfied
taxpayers, some ns accountants, some as administrators, some seedy
types as consultants, and all too many as lawyers. Each will have
his mm interpretation, his own emphasis. Most, however, will not
read through the proposition at all, and will be spared the risk of
guessing at its meaning.
To make it a Ii ttle more readable, I've dissected it into three parts,
something like a bug.
o It has a head and a tail, and that's all most people will s~e. The
head of Proposition 4 is made up of limitations, prominently placed
up front in Sections 1, 3, 4, and 5. It appears friendly enough.
Appropriations are to be limited, but they can be increased with
population and the cost of living. P~ople can vote additional ap-
propriations. Reasonable. funds can be set up for contingencies
and emergencies. ·
o It's tail is also prominent. Section 11 at the end gives an effective
date, and Section 2 is a highly visible reference to returning ex-
cessive revenues. These are implementation clauses.
o Proposition 4 also has a middle section which is very large in size,
hut easy to ignore because it is obtusely written and disorganized.
However, this .is the interpretative· section, which gives meaning
to the limitation. · · _ .
As you can see from the attached exhibit, our bug has a small head,
a smaller tail, and a very large middle. The guts, pardon the expres-
sion, are in the middle, not in the head.
If you look at the exhibit you \-vill see that I've underlined nvo key
terms which recur again and again: 11 appropriations limit" (or t:appro-
priations subject to limitation") and uproceeds of taxes. n These terms
are the soul of the initiative. They are defined along with a number
of other terms in Section 8 and 9, part of the large middle section
which few readers will even scan. I hope you ·will not be among thos~
whose attention wanders somewhere around the middle of Section 5 ..
If you read on, thoughtfully, you will begin to see questions and seek
answers like the one's I'm going to present in the middle section of
this paper, starting now.
How is the appropriations limit determined? In common usage an ap-
propriation is the act of setting apart, or assigning to a ·particular
use or person, in exclusion of al! others; as of money to carry out
some public object. (Webster's quoted in 80 Cul 220.) Words in a
constitutional amendment should be given their natural and ordinnry
meaning (35 Cal App 3d 473). However, apparent ambi~Juities may be
resolved by· contcmperaneous construction of the Legislature· (20 Cal
3d 765). In addition the ballot nrguments and nnalysis presented to
the electorate may be helpful in resolving uncertain language (33 Cal
2d 564).
. , . 2
J •
·~-
. \...,,)
Except for the first citation, all of these references nrc from the state
Supreme Court's recent review of Proposition 13. They suggest that
the court is not bound by any "accounting" definition, or by previous
legislation in giving meaning to the word "appropriations." ·
Nevertheless, I am reluctant to ignore the meaning of appropriations .
as found in the present Government Code. The Supreme. Court may
adopt this meaning as "ordinary" or the Legislature may a~t to impute
to Proposition 4 the definitions already codified.
The Government Code generally requires local agencies, including cities
and special districts, to adopt and file an annual budget by August
30 (Section 53901). The act of adopting the budget becomes on act
of appropriation (Section 29092). The individual totals for the budget
items become the appropriations.
In this usage an appropriation is an estimate of annual expenditures
(on either a cash or accrual basis) together with obligations to be in-
curred (Section 39001, 39001.5). Appropriations not expended or en-
cumbered within the fiscal year lapse and revert to the fund balance
available for later appropriation (Section 29143).
However, Proposition· 4 does not limit individual appropriations or even
the aggregate amount of all appropriations. It limits only the total of
appropriations funded by "proceeds of taxes, 11 which it defines in Sec-
tion 8( c), and by present state "subventions," which it does not define.
To find your appropriations limit you will have to revielv your year-end
financial statement for 1978/79. Your appropriations limit for that year
appears to be the sum of the following: ·
1. Your total proceeds from taxes of all kinds, less any taxes collected
specifically for debt service as defined in Section 8(g). ·
2. Your total revenue from regulatory licenses and service fees less
all charges allocated as a cost of providing ·the regulation or service.
3. Your total revenue from the state as grants, aid, and subsidies
of all kinds .
This formulu assumes that any of the above revenues not actualiy spent
in 1978/79 were either encumbered Or' transferred by appropriation to .
a con ting ency fund. If they were carried forward as an addition to a
general fund or enterprise fund balance, the ~ppropriations limit has
to be reduced by the amount carried forward. ·
If your accounting system wasn 1t sophisticated enough to identify the
cost of providing regulations for which you collected a license fee, or
the cost of service for which you collected user charges or user fees,
you have two problems·. One, you have to go back and make a reason-
able reallocation of your 1978/79 costs so you can find your appropria-
tions limit for that year. Two, you have to revise your accounting
systems to allocate all costs properly chargeable to regulations and
services, and to document that allocation. · ·
3
:.'.
In this respect, single purpose spedal districts have an advantage.
All their costs are allocable to sewerage or water service as the case
may be. Multipurpose districts, counties, and cities have a more dif-\wJ
ficult burden. They hnve to allocate general and administrative costs
among different activities and services• !\Jany I if not most I have never
allocated all such costs among their operating depurtments or enterprise
funds. Under Proposition 4 they can no longer afford not to charge a
full overhead burden agninst services and regulatory functions for
which a fee is charged.
Isn't there an element of chance in finding the a2_propriations limit?
Yes, there are two ways in which chance may play ·a role. First, by
picking a particular base year, Proporition 4 makes the events of that
year, 1978/79, more decisive than they may have seemed. For example,
if you received a state "subvention 11 for 1978/79, and spent or encum-
bered it, your appropriation limit is higher b:y that amount than it
would have been without the '·'subvention. 11
Since Proposition 4 ·doesn't tell us what a subvention is, we are left
to the general rules of construction which I cited earlier. The natural
and ordinary meaning of subvention as. given by Webster's (3rd New
International) is a subsidy from a government. A subsidy is ·further·
defined as a grant of funds or property to assist in the establishment
or support of an enterprise deemed advantageous to the public. The
State Attorney General has defined subvention as a paymerit by which
one entity of government subsidizes a service provided by another
entity of government. . ~·
I see nothing in these definitions ·which requires a narrow interpretation
of the word subvention so as to restrict it to operating aid. I believe
that the state funded portion of any clean water grant is a state sub-
vention. If you happened to get one in 1978/79, you are a winner in
the game of Constitutional Keno. ·
The second element of chance in finding your appropriations limit is
an element of risk. Your allocation of costs, in determining the cost
· of service, is subject to challenge. Ho·wever, ·I do not believe that
your exposure is a serious one.
Proposition 4 allows you to deduct all "costs reasonably borne" in pro-
viding the regulation, product or service. That language invites your
exercise of professional judgment. Unless that judgment is so conspic-
uously abused as to be crbitrary and capricious, it will with stand court
challenge. The real risks are the costly nuisances of (a) having to
memorialize every allocation in sufficient detail that you can recall it,
and (b) of having to respond to legal harassment if someone doesn't
like your judgment.
How are capital costs trentccl und£?:r Proposition 11? ·There appear to ·
beilirceclT:fforent answers depending on the source of funds.
1. 1f the project is reasonnbly necessary to the provision of a service
or regulatory function for which foes are collected, the fees can
4
. ....,,_;
be set to puy the capital coHt and can be used for tlrnt purpose.
The only limitation on the use of fees is thnt they he used to pay
"costs reasonably borne" in providing· the regulation, product or
~ervice .
. In the exhibit· you will find this language nnd several similarly
vague terms set off by quotation marks. This kind of vague lan-
guage is permitted in c·onstitutional provisions even though similar
language might invalidate a penal law. By nature constitutions
paint with broad strokes and leave room for interpretation. . .
·I've already discussed the latitude in the work "reasonable·,." so
I'll turn now to the word "costs." Certainly in ordinnry usage
costs include capital· as well as operating costs. If I asked a sales-
man how much a car costs, he might point to the sticker price,
or say so much a month, or talk about gasoline mileage. In any
of these senses--capital cost, loan amortization, or O&ivl we would
· be talking about cost. Nothing in Proposition 4 itself says that it
means one kind of cost but not another.
I conclude, therefore, that you can charge off anainst fee income
any ldnd of cost related to the production of that income, at least
on a pay-as-you-go basis. I'll talk later about debt financing.
The difficulty with pay-as-you-go financing· for large long-lived
projects is that it puts all _the _capital cost of future use _on present
users. It discourages building for tomorrow.
2. If the source of capital is current revenue but not fees related to
the project, then the project has to be financed within your appro-
priations limit. (I'm again pussing over the option of debt financ-
ing.) If your appropriations in 1978/79 includf!d a capital outlay
from -proceeds of taxes, state grants or net utility revenues, you
may have some headroom to make further capital appropriations.
However, if ·you had prudently built up a capital outlay fund and
withdrawn from it in 1978/79, the amount withdrmvn wns not an
11 appropriation subject to limitation." You have been too conser-
vative to win at Constitutional Keno.
3. If you intend to pay for a project from a reserve or capital outlay
fund you may do so. However, if you wish to replenish the fund
from taxes, state grants or net utility revenues, you will have .to
. fund the replenishment from within your appropriations limit.
Section 5 does permit you to replenish the fund from utility reve-
nues or regulatory fees to the extent that the project' is chargeable
as a cost of the regulation, product, or service. In other ·words
you can replenish reserves used to finance the capital cost of serv-
ices Jor which you bill. But if you are a city you could ill afford
to deplete reserves to build a police or fire station; nor could you
as a county easily replenish funds used to build a jail or a juvenile
hall .
,. . . 5
How docs P~~pos~~!.9_i:i_~ affecLth~ issmmcc of bond~? Here a~rain ~here
appear to Ee severnl answers aepending ontfic type o.f bond and its
... . ,.
time of authorization. I will start with the subject of bonds outstanding ~
as ~f January 1, 1979.
1. Proposition 4 is not to impair any government entity from ,.meeting
its obligntions" with respect to bonded indebtedness.· That is es-
sentially an assurance that general obligntion and revenue borids,
voted or unvoted, but authorized by January 1 will be paid. Money
raised to pay debt service on these issues is outside the appropria-
tions limit. Arguably any net utility revenue raised to supply
"coverage" under the terms of a revenue bond issue is also outside
the appropriations limit even if it exceeds the "cost11 of s·ervice.
This is a point which the Legislature could clarify if Proposition 4
passes. Historically the impairment of con tract clause of the Federal
Constitution has protected revenue covenants.
Payments on lease revenue bonds are a different matter. Generally
they are not debt service under California law. They are rent
paid for facilities, that is, an operating cost payable under a long-
term agreement. Under Proposition 4 such payments ·would be qutside
the appropriations limit only to the extent that the rental is charge-
able to a fee supported regulation, product, or service and paid
from the fees collected. If all or part of the rent relates to non-fee
activities, Proposition 4 requires that pnrt of the rent to be paid
from within the appropriations lL'nit. Proposition 4 like Proposition 13
certainly weakens the security behind lease revenue bonds for non-
fce facilities, but it doesn't destroy the obligation to pay the bonds.
2. Let me now talk about new bond issues, those. authorized after
·January 1, 1979. Proposition '1 specifically protects bond service
on vote:l bonds. That is, bond service on voted bonds falls out-
side 1J1e appropriations limit. But Proposition 4 does not prohibit
nonvoted bonds.
Two exa.i"'11ples of· non voted bonds are bonds issued under the 1933
Sewer Revenue Bond Act and certain 1941 Law Revenue Bonds issued
by joint powers sewerage agencies acting under a cease-and desist
order. Both of these forms of nonvotcd bonds are enterprise bonds
payable from utility revenues. They are payable solely from fees
for a product or service. Debt payment on these bonds appears
to be a cost of service, ~nd therefore not subject to the appropria-
tion limit.
In summary, Proposition 4 doesn't seem to affect revenue 'bonds, old
or new, whether voted or not. It does not say they are not ·bonded
indebtedness. It does not say they may not be issued. It docs not
say they Ct:mnot be paid from foes for a product or service. Common
usage would illlow repayment of borrowed money as a "cost reasonably
borne" in providing a product or service. There is nothing in the
word "cost" which implies that you cnn charge off only depreciation,
bond principal, or some amount less thnn bond service. If the authors
hncl in.tended to define cost to exclude bond service they could easily
have done so. ·
6
..
With r~spect to lease revenue bonds also, the situation for new issues
is the same as for old issues. ·They are not bonded indebtednc~s.
Rent not related to foe activities has to be paid from v;ithin the appro-
pria~ions limit. Hent related to fee activities can be pnid from fees
and charged as a cost of the product or service.
Q~n't yo*_!.hl!1k of _any_.Qthc!:_ ri_.Q.j_culou:_;_~om_R1ic~!_ion? Sure. How about
the rate et-down effect? Under Proposition 4 if you don't appropriate
to your limit in any given year, you loose that much of yor limit for
good. Your limit ratchets down.
You can protect yourself by making sure that all tax revenues·, net
utility revenues I or state urants are clearly spent, -encumbered I or
appropriated to contingency or reserve funds each year. Don't let
appropriations lapse because contracts are not ready for award.
What ha2pens if_g_~~_gr~_? reduces or eliminates Revenue Sh~ring? .
This question is potentially of great importance to the state, counties,
and cities. The nnswer is that services funded from revenue sharing
generally cannot be funded from new state or local taxes under Propo-
sition 4. Federal subventions are not appropriations subject to limita-
tion. They do not raise the ceiling on. expenditures which may be
made from state or local proceeds of taxes.
Can fees for wa_t~~r, sew~I1 garbage collection, and otha1· servic~e
raised under Prop9~itio~_i? Yes., ~net revenues in excess of the
cost of service will be treated as tax proce.eds. If they and other
tax proceeds exceed the appropriations limit, the amount of excess
has to be returned within the two follmving fiscal years.
The excess does not have to be returned in the form it was earned.
Utility 11 profits" can be put into the general fund to reduce property
taxes, for example. On this point, however, you will want to watch
SB 131 and SB 246, which limit the amount of "profitu or ·constrain its
use.
The practical· problem is that you \vill want to clearly relate rate increases
to cost increases. For example, escalating connect.i.on charges should
be tied to debt repayment or cost indices. Other rate increases should
be documented by well detailed estimates of prospective revenue und
expenditures. This all means more money to provide the same services.
Are there other hidden costs in Proposition 4? Yes. For your own
protection you shot\fd document your-compffance with Proposition 4 as
part of each year's financial statement. This means that for every
regulatory or service function, for which fees are charged, there should
be a statement of :f ecs received versus costs incurred. Any excess oJ
fees over costs should then be added to tax receipts, earnings on tnx
receiptn, and state subventions. Finally you should compare these
revenue totals to your appropriations limit for the year. ·
You cun probnbly complete this reconciliation four to six months into
.-..,,,; the suc~ecding fiscnl year, and adjust tux :rates or fee schedules for
., .. 7
the second following year. If Proposition 4 passes·, the Legislature
may tell the State Controller to send you. some regulations on this sub-
ject.
Is Pro~os~tio~actic~l a~ministrative}y? In most respec~s, yes. 1 TI"ue, it is wfia1:1hc state Supreme Court has called "a legislative batter-
ing ram used to tear through the exasperating tangle of trndit.ional
legislative procedure." It is a crude instrument for delicate work.
It also leaves much· room for interpretation and legal argument~. Look
again at the number of vague terms hi{Jhligh ted on the exhibit.
I
·As I've noted a couple of times, Proposition 4 is also ovcrzealo.us.. In
Hs thrust to curtail expansion of government service, it adds consid-
~rably to the cost and burden of continuing services which are indis-
putably necessary·.
. .
In addition there are two areas which virtually defy administration as
the Proposition now stands.
o First is the subvention issue. Do subventions mean all subsidies
from the state, or just operating subsidies? Does the term "sub-
vention" refer to the services subvented or· to the dollars paid?
If the reference is· to dollars paid, does the reference apply sep-
arately to each program or only to the gross amount of subventions
for programs in effect at the time referred to? ·
-
. ....
o Second is the interest-on-investments problem·. Revenues from · V
the investment of tax revenues are defined as "proceeds of taxes; 11 . ·
they have to be accounted for in determining whether proceeds of
taxes exceeded the appropriation limit. But tax revenues have
not generally been segregated for investment. Under Proposition 4
they must at least be· accounted for separately. When does a tax
revenue cease to be a tax revenue? If it is transferred to a reserve
fund or rctireme.nt fund, does it have to be tracked indefinitely,
so that its investment earnings are stated separately from earnings
on funds transferred as a cost of service? What is the starting
point? Do we assume that some, all, or none of the existing fund
balances cnme from tax revenues?
Although I've already offered a lot of opinions, and a few guesses, I
won't offer my guesses on these issues. All the evidence isn 1t in yet.
As we saw with Proposition 13, the Supreme Court will look not only
at the words of Proposition 4, if it passes and is challenged, but also
at the official ballot arguments, campaign literature, and espe~ially at
any fallow-up legislation. I expect thn.t the Leuislature ·would try to
clarify the meanings of "subvention" and "proceeds from investment, 11
nnd possibly address other points I've tried to cover. I won't specu-
late on what the Legislature will say, or whether its action vmuld make
matters better or worse. ·
Before concluding I want to nddress one other qucs tion.
... a
t I
....
Are ~l?.cci.~LJ!j~tr!_~~s cxem2.~. fr~m P~ .. 0205-U.~m~-. .L~Y...!£~1~12_of S_c:f_~~2!~~?
No, w1fl1 few exceptions. Section 9 states. Lwo exceptions, and tficy
are both illusory .
One excepts from limitation any special district whose ad vulorcm tax
levy in 1977 /78 did not exceed 12. s· cents per $100. This means your
tax levy before Proposition 13 for all purposes: debt, operations, ·
and reserves. Few districts qualify, and even fewer if improvement
district tax levies have to be considered.
The second exception is for any special district totally funded by other
than proceeds of taxes. Notice two points: (a) proceeds of ·~axes
include state grants or other subven~ions and investment earnings on
tax revenues. (b) No year is stated for determining whether a special
district is exempt. It has to pass the test every year. If it accepts
a clean water grant under the present program (i.e. not a new program
or a higher level of service under Sectiori 6), it is back in the appro-
priations harness. If some of its investn)ent earnings are attributed
to tax revenues, even those received years ago and used to build up
reserves, it is back in harness. ·
In summarizing I won't retrace my steps through this paper. I will
just add two points--a petulant complaint, a·nd a I?rec~utionary note.
I am ill-tempered enough to resent the deceitful arrangement of Propo-
sition 4, even thoug·h I realize that the initiative game is often played
that wa-y. What you think you see when you look at the head and .
tail is not what you get in the middle. And as you can see from this
paper, the middle is pretty ~ard to decipher.
I must also caution you not to believe v;hat I have said either. My
opinions are sincere, but not incontestable. Were there not room for
differences of opinion, there would be wholesale unemployment among
la\vyers. ·
Furthermore, Proposition 4 has not yet passed. If offers no bonanzas
to anyone who votes for it. It will hurt those who need new or better
services from government. It ignores the needs of future generations.
It leaves little flexibility to respond to rcccssi.on or disaster. It will
continue to drive dedicated and qualified managers out of governmant
service. ·
You can't even tell from Proposition-4 how much government will cost.
All you can be sure of it that more of the costs would he paid through
service fees, and that the public would get more administration and
less service for its money.
. .. 9
EXCERPTS FROM THE MIN UTES OF THE REGU LAR
JO I NT MEETI NG OF THE BOARDS or DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SAN ITATIO N DISTRI CT S NOS. 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6 , 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COU NTY, CALIFORN I A
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Or ange County, California , was held at the h our
of 7:30 p.m., September 12 , 19 79, 10 84 4 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Or ganization called the meeting to order
at 7: 30 p .m.
Th~ roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present .
* * * * *
ALL DISTRICTS
Amending previous Board action
approving Adde ndum No. 1 to
agreement with John Carollo
Engineers re Treatment Plant
Facilities Plan
as follows:
* * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board action of May 9, 19 79,
approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with
John Carollo Engineers re separate Treatment
Plant Facilities Pl ans for Flow Equa lization
Project, be, and is hereby, amended to read
"That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 79-58, approving
Addendum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engine e rs re Treatment Plant
Facilities Plan, providing for preparation of separate Facilities Plan for
the Flow Equali z ation Project, on a per diem fe e basis, increasing the maxi-
imum amou nt for the Treatment Plant Facilities Plan from $100,000 to $125,000,
be, and is hereby, approved . A certified copy of this resolution is attached
here to and made a part of these minutes."
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of th e Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true
and corre ct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on
the 1 2th day of September , 19 79 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto d y? of September
1979
S-107
EXCERPT S FRml THE mNUTES OF THE REGU LAR
JOINT MEETIN G OF THE BOARDS or DIRECTO RS OF COUNTY
SANITAT I ON DI STRICTS NOS . 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6 , 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COU NTY , CALIFORN I A
A re gu lar joint meeting of th e Boards of Directors of County Sanit ation Districts
Nos . 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California , was he l d at th e hour
of 7 :30 p .m., September 12 , 1979 , 10 844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley , Ca lifornia.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Or ganization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was ca lled and the Secretary reported a quorum present .
* * * * * * * * *
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to engage
Delphi Systems for computer
programming changes to comp l y
with new OCERS retirement plan
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the s t aff be, and i s he reby, auth-
orized to engage Delphi Systems, Inc . for
computer programming changes to comply with
new Or ange County Emplo yees Retiremen t System
(OCERS) change
diem fee basis
to a dual retirement pl a n effective September 21, 1979, on a per
for a total amount not to exceed $5,000 .
STATE OF CA LIFO RNIA)
) SS .
COU NTY OF OR ANGE )
I, J . WAY NE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boa rds of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7 , and 11, of Or a nge County,
Ca l ifornia, do hereb y certify th a t the above and for ego ing to be full, true
an d correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boa rds of Directors on
the 12th day of September , 19 79 .
I N WIT NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
19 79
Nos .
S-107
10-10-79
REPORT OE THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
THE STAFF HAS BEEN QUITE BUSY SECURING CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
AND HAVE RECEIVED, SINCE THE LAST BOARD MEETING, $23,450,000 IN GRANTS
FOR DIGESTION FACILITIES, ALONG WITH THE DEWATERING FACILITIES RE-
QUIRED AT PLANT NO, 2. THE DISTRICTS WILL ALSO RECEIVE APPROXIMATELY
$9,3 MILLION NEXT WEEK FOR THE SLUDGE TRANSPORT FACILITIES, WHICH
INCLUDE TRUCKS, TRAILERS AND EQUIPMENT TO PROCESS SLUDGE AT THE COYOTE
CANYON LANDFILL SITE AS WELL AS APPROXIMATELY $8,2 MILLION OF CON-
STRUCTION GRANT FUNDS FOR DISTRICT #11 TO CONSTRUCT THE COAST HIGHWAY
TRUNK,
WE ARE ALSO HAPPY TO REPORT THAT THE WAIVER APPLICATION FOR
1,.,,_1 MODIFICATIONS OF SECONDARY TREATMENT AS REPORTED AT THE LAST MEETING
WAS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 13, WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED BY EPA.
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,,
. . .
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31, INVITE ~ OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO
ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS:
----......
HAROLD SE~
~ST~
CHARLES SYLVIA
LOUIS VELASQUEZ
10-10-79
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
THE STAFF HAS BEEN QUITE BUSY SECURING CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
AND HAVE RECEIVED1 SINCE THE LAST BOARD MEETING1 $231450 1000 IN GRANTS
FOR DIGESTION FACILITIES, ALONG WITH THE DEWATERING FACILITIES RE-
QUIRED AT PLANT NO, 2, THE DISTRICTS WILL ALSO RECEIVE APPROXIMATELY
$9,3 MILLION NEXT WEEK FOR THE SLUDGE TRANSPORT FACILITIES1 WHICH
INCLUDE TRUCKS1 TRAILERS AND EQUIPMENT TO PROCESS SLUDGE AT THE COYOTE
CANYON LANDFILL SITE AS WELL AS APPROXIMATELY $8,2 MILLION OF CON-
STRUCTION GRANT FUNDS FOR DISTRICT #11 TO CONSTRUCT THE COAST HIGHWAY
TRUNK,
WE ARE ALSO HAPPY TO REPORT THAT THE WAIVER APPLICATION FOR
MODIFICATIONS OF SECONDARY TREATMENT AS REPORTED AT THE LAST MEETING
WAS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 13 1 WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED BY EPA.
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,1 . .
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO
ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS:
HAROLD SEITZ
DONALD STRAUSS
CHARLES SYLVIA
LOUIS VELASQUEZ
MEETING DATE October lO, 1979 TIME 7:30 p.m. DJST~ICTS l,2,3,5,6,7&11
DISTRICT 1
~SCHUSTER). • • • • SHARP • • • • • • • ~
YAMAMOTO). • • • • WARD • •••• • • • ~ ----
RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY ••• ~ •• ~========
CRANK) •• • • • • • • HUTCH I SON·· • • ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 2
FR I ED) •••• • • • • WEDAA • • • • • • • V'
RASHFORO ). • • • • HOLT· • ••• • •• •. V"'° ==== ====
GAMB I NA) •••••• FOX • • • • • • • • • .,,-___ _
WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON...... '-"'
ANTHONY).····. MILLER ••••••• ~ ----
CULVER) ••••••• PERRY········~ ==== ====
GRAHAM) ••••••• ~ee~T········~
SEYMOUR).····. ROTH • •••••• • ...JL. ----
HOYT) •••••••• SMITH· ••••••• __aL" ----
SVALSTAD) ••••• STANTON ••••• ·~ ----
WINT~RS) •••••• VELASQUEZ····~========
WARD) •••• ••••• YAMAMOTO •• • ·~ ___ _
DISTRICT 3 .
NYBORG) ••••••• FRESE •••••••• ~
EVANS)········ ROWAN········~ ----
SVALSTAD) ·····ADLER········ .....,..... ----MACAL~I STER)· ·BAI LEY·······~========
PERRY)······· ·CULVER·······~
COLLACOTT) ····FINLAYSON····~ ----
CORBETT)······ 8RAllAM· •• • •• ·-i,L ----
GAMBINA) • • • • • • LEt·BARON • • • • ·-i,L ----
GRIFFIN)····· ·.REESE· ••••• ··~ ----
SEYMOUR)······ ROTH····.···· ..,_....... ----
LASZLO)· • • • • ··SEITZ. • • • • • • • .,_..,.. ----
OMMI CK.~ •••••• SYLVIA· •• ····~========
WHEELER •••••• WEISHAUPT •••• ~
ANTHONY •••••• WIEDER •••••• -~ ----
VELASQUEZ). ••• WINTERS ••••• -~ ----
WARD). •••• ~ ••• YAMAMOTO •••• ·~==== ====
DISTRICT 5
~HUMMEL)\ •••••• RYCKOFF •••••• ~
RYCKOFF J ••• ··.STRAUSS •••• ··~-.---
ANTHONY) •••••• RI LEY········~====
DISTRICT 6
~RYCKO~F) •• ····MC INNIS····· ~
CRANK ••••• • •• HUTCH I SON·.·-~==== ====
RILEY •••••• ·-ANTHONY.: •••• ·~--__
DISTRICT 7
HOYT) • • • • • • • ·SMITH· • • • • • • • V"'
RYCKOFf)······WILLIAMS····· ........... ==== ====
WAHNER} t ••••• '!'*-:eel<NER ••••• ~ ----
ANTHONY). ... I • Ml LLER ~ ••••• t ~ ----
s ILLS)· • • • •• • • VARDOULI S •••• ~ ___ _
YAMAKOTo). ····WARD •••••••• ;~ ___ _
SCHUSTER)····· WELSH .••••••• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 11
(MACALLJSTER) •• PATTINSON •••• .,,....-
(MAND IC) ••••••• MA CALLI STER •• ---,;;7"' ----
(ANTHONY) •••••• WI EDER. • • • • • • ),/' ==== ====
JOINT BOARDS
(SVALSTAD)·····ADLER······ .,,,,,
(RILEY)······· ·ANTHONY····~ --MACAL~I~TER)· ·BAILEY·····~====
PERRY)········CULVER·····--.;;;;'
COLLACOTT) .. ···FINLAYSON··~ --
GAMB I NA)· • • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • ·~ ==== NYBORG)·······FRESE······~
WAHNER)······ ·€kQSIHliR • ·~ __
CORBETT)····· ·eRAllAfl • • • ·~
RASHFORD) ·····HOLT······· ..,.---
WELLS)······· ·HOUSTON··· ·--J£: ====· CRANK)········HUTCHISON··~
GAMBINA) ······LE BARON···~
MANDIC)···~···MACALLISTER~---
RYCl<OFF) ······MC INNIS···~ __ _
ANTHONY)· .• •·· ·MILLER···· .=.z-__ _
MACALLISTER)·· PATTINSON·· .__.....--·
CULVER)······· PERRY······~ --
GR'I FF IN)· • • • • ·REESE· • • • • • ~ ==== ANTHONY)····~·RILEY······~
. GRAHAM) • • • • • • • ~e~'r • • • • • • --JL_ ==== SEYMOUR)······ROTH·······~
EVANS)········ ROWAN······~ --
HUMMEL)······· RYCKOFF • • • • l/"° ====
.LASZLO)······· SElTZ· • • • • ·~
SCHUSTER)·····SHARP······__JL ====
HOYT) • • • • • • • • • SM lTH • • • • • • ~
SVALSTAO) ·····STANTON····~====
RYCKOFF)······STRAUSS····~
ZOMMI CK)· • • • • ·SYLVIA· • • • • ~-
SILLS}······· ·VARDOULIS· -~-
WINTERs) •••••• vELASQUEZ· ·~====
YAMAMOTO)·····WARD·······~
FRIED)······· ·WEDAA· • • • • ·~ --
SHEELER)····· ·WEISHAUPT··~====
SCHUSTER)· • • ·~WELSH· • • • • • ,,,,,,--__
ANTHONY) •••••• WI EDER. • • • • a----__
RYCKOFF)· ·····WILLIAMS···~ __
VElASQUEz) •••• WINTERS •••• ~
WARD) ••••••••• YAMAMOTO •• -~====
OTHERS
HARPER ••••• ___ _
SYLVESTER·· ___ _
LEWIS •••••• ___ _
CLARKE • • • • • ___ _
BROWN •••• •• ___ _
WOODRUFF • • • ___ _
HOHENER • • • • ___ _
HOWARD • • • • • ___ _
HUNT-· •••••• ___ _
KEITH •••••• ___ _
KENNEY •••• • _· __ _
LYNCH •••••• ___ _
MADDOX •••• • __ __
MARTINSON •• ___ _
PIERSALL ••• ___ _
STEVENS •••• _. __ _
TRAVERS •• •.• ___ _
OCTOBER 10, 1979 J OI NT MTG . NOTES
(7 -a) Report of the Joint Chairman
Fox reported that the staff has bee n quite busy securi ng c on struc tion
grants and have received since the l as t Board meeting $23 ,450,000 in
grant s for Digestion Fac ili ties, a long with the Dewatering Fa cilities
required at Plant No. 2 . The Districts wil l also rec eive approximately
$9 .3 million next week for the sludge Tra ns port Facilities , which
includes trucks, traile rs and equipment to process sludge at Coyote
Canyon landfill site, as well as approximately $8 .2 million of construc -
tion grant funds for District No. 11 to construct the Coast Trunk Sewer.
Said we are also happy to report that the waiver application for
modifications of secondary treatme nt, as re ported a t the l as t mee ting ,
was f iled on September 13th, within the time limi ts specified by EPA .
He then a sked Mr . Harper to commen t on grants. FAH said he just attended
a meeting in Houston a nd some of the large agencies are very disappointed
in their grant program . City of LA has been hung up fo r years because
of sludge line into the ocean. Sepulvada project -$40 million is still
waiting for a grant . Seattle Metro says the best they can get is 6% of
funds available for State of Washington . Other agencies are being
forc ed into court for "consent decrees ''. Then are under time constraints.
Think we have been very fortunate here . We have not taken the adversary
position. Is partly through the efforts of Ray Lewis and his staff.
Fox added this is a compliment to the staff . Howe ver , it has always
bee n my opinion that this Board is an agress ive Board and onc e a p roblem
is diagnosed , the Board has taken off after it and t h ey have gone out
as individuals and worked . Commend ed Board also .
Called Executive Committee mee ting for October 3 1. Directors requested
it b e changed to October 30th . Invited Director Hutchison to attend
in place of Mcinnis. Also invited Directors Seitz and Strauss as guests .
(7-b) Repor t of the General Manager
FAH reported he jus t returned from hi s trip to Europe with the AM SA
technologica l group . Very interesting. Said h e hoped to have some
slides in the next few days and will show at next Board meet ing .
Said one of the key impressions is their approach t o water pollution
prob l ems is quite d i fferent th a n t he United States . We have blanket
rul es app lied a ll over the country. In E ngland, Germany and the
Nether l a nds they l et some of th e small entities make up their own
minds on whatever the problem is and what they want th e water to b e
depending what th e water is to be us ed for . In Great Britain in uppe r
reaches of the rive r, the problem sludge is d isposed of on land or
inc inerated. Near the ocean sludge is barged at sea. Great Britain
aske d them to work with them to convince European economics peop le
they have b ee n doing this for years . In Germany have been puttin g raw
sewa ge on the land for 25 years and they h ad a celebration t o s how
what had been ac complished . I s on about 10 acres . Have odor probl ems .
They put in secon dary treatment plant to g e t r i d of odors . Very
int eres ting in England . Have organization similar to SCCWRP called SI RA .
It had to d o with ins trum entation where agencies lik e our selves were
buying tes ting equipment but the quality woul d fluctuate . They set up
testing lab and the work t h ey are doing the re is just marve lous. Comp an ies
in U.S . ar e joining this group , particul arly oil cow~anies . Had a two
day trip to Poland. Also very interesting. They have technical
people but sewage tre atment is down the road a ways .
Also mentioned odor prob lems at Plant 2 that were brought up at the
last Board meeting . Have people on that and think we ha ve temporaril y
taken car e of it . Weathe r has been in our favor also . Haven't had
any comp l aints for 3 wee ks.
(7-c) Report of the General Counsel
Nothing specific to repo rt .
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR
/Yamamoto questioned (c). Asked i f that $1 4 ,000 change order was added
to second l owest bid, would they still be the low bidder? REL explained
that this was awarded over a year ago. Changes have be en coming up
over the year . Hard to say wheth er this would bri ng him over the second
low bidder . (Job No . P2 -23 -6)
A e a l so questioned date on page "D-4 ". Said January 19, 1979 and
should have been January 19 , 19~.
Al l items on consent calendar moved , seconded and carried .
(lG -b) AL L DISTRICTS -Other business
Don Smith , Chairman of Reorganization Committee , indicated that he
understood the staff has the financial informqtion needed except for
the Gann Initiati ve . Wou l d like to set a date for a Committee meet i ng
at the November mtg . to review the status of the reorganization . Will
be on November agenda.
(29-b) DISTRICT 7 -Re Annexation No . 82
Fox asked if there were any repre sentatives from Baldwin present . None
present.
-2-