The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-09-12' 11': BOAR DS OF DIRECTORS II Cou nty Son ifotion Districts Post O ffice Box 8 127 of O range Co unty, Cali fo rnia 10844 El l is Aven ue Fountain Vo ll ey, Ca li f., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 7 14 540-2910 962-24 1 1 AGE N DA MEE T ING DATE SEPTEMBER 12 , 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDIT I ONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD, IN ADDITION; STAFF WI LL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P,M , IMMEDIATE LY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY 'S ME ETI NG IN THE CON FERENCE ROOM ADJOI NING THE DIS TRICTS ' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointme nt of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any &e~~tal agenoo- (6) EACH DISTRICT (7 ) Considera tion of motions approving minutes of the fol l owing meetings, as mailed : District 1 August District 2 August District 3 August District 5 August Distr ict 6 August District 7 August District 11 August ALL DISTRICTS Re ports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) Gen eral Ma nager (c) General Counsel 8, 1979, regular 8, 1979, regular 8, 1979, regular 8 , 1979, regul ar 8, 1979, regular 8, 1979, regu l ar 8, 1979, regular • l~J ALL UJ ~JKJ~l~ (9) Conm1 e ndati o n to Li<l s ley Parsons for his s ervices as Di s tricts ' Cou unission e r and Preside nt of the Southern Callfornia Coastal Water Researcl1 Project ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE .............. ... Considera tion of roll call vot e motion r a tifyin g payment of cl aims of the joint and individu a l Districts as follow s : (Each Director shall be called only once and th at vote will be regarded as the same for each District represent e d, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See Pages "A" , "B" and "C" \ ALL DISTRICTS 7/31/79 Joint Operating Fu nd $ 70,688.29 Capital Outlay Re volving Fund -38;545.41 Joint \fork ing Capital Fund 27, 290. 93 DISTRICT NO. l DISTRICT NO. 2 DiSTRICT NO . 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO, 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 a 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT .. · ... 1, 277. 72 362 ,412.40 ·6,331.46 24.49 1,160.78 3,029 .03 147,665.45 5.46 $658,431.42 8/14/79 8/28/79 $ 18 9,681.30 $ 88,717.46 ·1,840,547.22 21,905.80 32,755.75 45,461 .45 130.58 760 .95 6,620.23 7,501.67 4,051.09 2,991.42 498.48 3' 301. 90 $2,088,840.59 2,562.28 6,982.45 596.16 1,894.42 597.02 2,321.45 5.46 $171,043.95 (10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 10(A) THROUGH 10(DD) All matter s placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or furth e r explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent cal endar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there wi ll be no separate discussion of these items. Al l items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving al l motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calend a r. All items removed from the cons ent calendar sha ll be consid e red in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wis h to remove a n item from the consent calendar shal l, upon recognition by the chair , state ~~~~~~~u~their name, address and designate by l etter the item to be ITEM NO. lO(b) to be :onsent calendar. removed from consent calendar Roll Call Vote or Cast Un anim ous Ba llo t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will d e termine if any items are to be deleted from the consent cal e ndar.· Consideration of action to approve a ll a g enda items appearing on th e con sent c a lendar not specifi c 3 ll y remov ed from s a me. -2- • i (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Conunittee to negotiate with engineering firms for services in connection with updating each District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities (b) (To be considered under Agenda Consideration of Resolution No. 79-119, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding negotiated contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job-No~ J-13-2R, to Coy Atkins in the Item No. 11) .'.,./ (c) (d) amount of $199, 000. See pages "D" and "E" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Portsat Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, granting a time exten~ion of 11 calendar days to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation due to delays caused by delivery of knife gate valves. See page "F" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-120, accepting Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for rire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, granting a time extension of 52 calendar days to the contract with R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. for delays caused by City approval of street excavation and blackflow prevention device and in securing supplies. See page "H" (f) Consideration of Resolution.No. 79-121~ accepting Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "!" (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, authorizing an addition of $633.73 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for extra stainless steel angle for work in Secondary Clarifier No. 9. See page "J" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-122, accepting Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "K" (i) Consideration· of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, authorizing an addition of $1,596.93 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for revised method of shoring and.boring operat.ions·dtte to undisclosed piping and duct. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR ~ontinued on pag~ 4) -3- • (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, authorizing an addition of $8,236.36 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for trenching basin floor to complete installation of required pipeline due to undisclosed obstruction, and granting a time extension of 18 calendar days to complete this work. See page "M" (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-123, accepting Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving. Final Closeout Agreement. See page "N" (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pressure Manhole and Street Repairs Near Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW-076, authorizing an addition of $2,527.61 to the contract with Byron L. Crume, Inc. for removal of sewage water from pipeline, including pumping, equipment rental, traffic control and additional excavation and compaction, and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for said work. See page "0" (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-124, accepting Pressure Manhole and Street Repairs Near Ellis Aven~e Pump Station, Job No. PW-076, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P" (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-125, approving equipment specifica- tions for Solids Transport and Processing Equipment for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 2, Jobs Nos. P2-24-iA, lB and IC, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids . See page "Q" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-126, approving plans and specifica- tions for Dewatering and Storage Facilities for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page . "R" (p) Consideration of motion amending Board action of May 9, 1979, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Treatment Plant Facilities Plan providing for preparation of separate Facilities Plan for the Flow Equalization Project, subject to receipt of a Step 1 grant, by deleting the requirement of ·receipt of grant approval (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specification No.·, R-001, providing detailed specification clarifications (Bids to be received 9/6) "'1.1 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- •(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) ·' (r) Consideration of motion authorizing travel, lodging and incidental expenditures incurred by the Districts' Chief Engineer in connection with membership on the California Association of Sanitation Agencies fact finding conuuittee established to review problems in the Truckee:-_Lake--Tafroe .. area_ .. --------.. ~-----·------- -~-------~--------- Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase to District's Assistant Engineer, Mike Jones, from Range 10588, Step 2.5 ($1843/mo.) to Range 1058B, Step 3 ($1895/mo.) in recognition of achieving his engineer's registration _,.,.. ----~ __ Consideration of motion ~!~9.!!~iJ.lg _ _the_Gen~FaJ-Manager~otiate and award purchase order to Waukesha Motor Company. for parts to rebuild Engine No. 8 at "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2 for an amount not to exceed $42,000 plus. tax and freight (u) Consideration of motion approving temporary disposal by the Irvine Ranch Water District or any other agency within Orange County of .15% dewatered digested sewage solids at the Coyote Canyon landfill site from September 13 to December 13, 1979, at a rate of twice the Districts' cost for processing the solids DISTRICT 2 (v) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Tetsuo and Mitsue Ozaki and Kenneth and Patsy Light for annexation of 1.057 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "S" DISTRICT 3 (w) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Southern California Edison Company dated August 8, 1979, in the amount of $775.27 in connection with construction of the Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and refer to contractor and liability claims administrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-130-5, approving plans and specifications for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "T" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (y) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, authorizing an addition of $6,103.31 to t~e contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for removal of grouted riprap from invert of Santa Ana River over siphon excavation area, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for completion of said work. See page "U" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (Continued) (11) (z) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re emergency repairs on A-B Trunk at Plant No. 2 (2) (3) DISTRICT 6 See page "V" Consideration of motion ratifying action of Chief Engineer in issuing purchase order to John A. Artukovich &ons, Inc. in .. the amount of $4., 144, 73 for emergency repairs on A-B Trunk Consideration of Resolution No. 79-131, approving agreement with Shaller and Lohr, Inc. for engineering services re design of connection of Santa Ana River-.. Siphon to Headworks "C" at .. Plant No. 2, Contract No. 5-21-1, for a lump sum fee of $26:,000 for Phase I and on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $7, 500 for Phase II. See page "W" (aa) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Dover Medical Building Owners, dated August 14, 1979, in the amount of $16,178. 77 relative to a sewage backup, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 7 (bb) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Kenneth and Jolene Buchanan and Marvin and Marilyn Tovey for annexation of .72 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recoIIUnendation 1 proposed Annexation No. 89 -Buchanan Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Mtce. Dist.) See page "X" (cc) Consideration of motion to receive and file Peters Canyon Study prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation and take under advisement (copy enclosed with agenda material) (dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-132-7, approving Sewerage Facility Reimbursement _Agreement. (Non-Master· Plan) ... with Greg Johnson for cpnstruction of local sewer line within 7th Sewer ·Maintenance District from the intersection of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive extending approximately 500 feet in Skyline Drive. See page "Y" END OF CONSENT CALENDA~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (12) ALI. DI STR I CTS Consideration of mo t ion to receive , file a nd approve Faciliti es Plan for Wa s t ewater Faci Ii ties -Resolution No . 79-36 (13) ALL DISTRICTS (14) (IS) (16 ) (17) . ITEMS ON SU?PLE/.'.[NTAL AGEND.A Con sideration of motion r ati fyinr. action of Ge ne ral Ma nager in filing Ap p li cation fo1· ~lodification of Secondary Treatmen t Re quirements pursu:mt to Se cti on 30l(h) of the Clean Ka t er Act of 1977 ALI . DISTRICTS El ection of ri sea l Po licy Conunittcc me. mber -Nomi ne es 1 : Dir~ccttnors :f Hutchi son, Donald Strauss and Harriett Wieder ~ " DISTRICT3 ~ El ection of Chairman pro tern I.A l ~-~1•1c Al.I. DISTRICTS Considerati on of mo tion to convene in e xecutive session re personnel matters AU. DISTRICTS OLh er b11 siness and commun i cations or supplemelital · agend a it ems; if any (17) (~) Roll Call Vote or Cast Un animous Ballot Co~sidcr a tion of Resolution No. 79 -12 7, t o receive and fi l e bid t abu l ation and recomrr.endatio11 an d awarding contract for ~lodif i cat i on s to Odor Scrubb ing Tow e r at Rec l ama ti on Pl~nt No . 1, Job No . PN-055-2, to P. H. Burl:e Corporation in the amount of $16 ,939.00 . Sec pages "l" and "ll" ITE MS ON SUPPLEMENTA L AGEN:lA (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-128, to r eceive and file bid t abu l i\t i on and reconmc nda ti on and a1~arJi ng contract for 10 ,000 Gallon Fue l T:i il l: Vapor Recovery Sy s tcr:i at Re c l omati on Pl ant No. 1, Job Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanim ous Ballot No. PW -057 , to Triad Me chanical, In::. in t he amount of $3 ,553 .00 . Sec }>agc·s "Ill" and "IV " ITEMS ON SU PPLEMENTA L AG [NDA (c ) Roll Call Vote or Cast U na ni m o ~s Ball ot Consideration of Resolution No . 79-12 9, t o rece ive and file bid t abu l ation and recor.une ndation to reject al 1 bids for 1\,·o (2) Climax Ga s Eneir,es, Seria l Nos . 46129 and -16 161 , Sp 0cification No. R-00 1 , and nuthorizing the General Manager to negotiate a purchase contract with Waukesha En~inc Servirente r, Inc. f or further con s ideration by the Boards. Sec p;igcs "V" and "VI" m :MS ON SUPPU:MENTA L AG Ei.JOA IT E/l'.S ON WP?tEJ.IENTAL AGENDA (d) (e) Conshlcrati on of motion authod zin g staff to eni:age Delphi Systems , Inc. for c ompu t e r prog r an uu i.ng ch:mges to comply with new Orange County Eir.pl oyces Retirement System change to a du a l retireme nt p l an effective September 21, 1979 , 011 a per diem fee basis for a t otal amount not to exceed $5,000 . Consideration of Reso lution No . 79-135, apJ >roving and authorizing renewa l of agricultur a l l ease (re Specification No. L-006) for Ron Call Vot e or Cast Unanimous Ball ot portion (approxima te l y 1.2 acres) of Districts ' interpl<1nt righ t -o f - way·to N:i k a se Brothers for a three -year period beginnin g October 1, 1979, for an ::i:rnua l rental of $345, with provi s iun for annual escala tion , and authori1ing District No . 1 to execut e said l ease in form approved by IT EMS ON SUPPL::M~N T AL AGENDA th e Ge nera l Counsel. See page "VII" (f) Cons ide r ation of motion authorizing staff to proce e d with emergen cy repairs t o 1'C 11 He::id;,·orks Gea r box No. 5 at Pl ant No. 2 on a force account basis (18) DI STRIC T 1 Other business an d commu nications or supp l eme ntal agenda items, if any (19) DIST RICT 1 Co nsideration of motion to adjou~n (20) DI STR IC T 5 Other bu sines.s a n<l c ommunications or supplemental agenda items , if any (21) DI STRlCT 5 Con sideration of motion to adjou rn (22 ) DISTRICT 6 Oth er bu s iness an d commun i cations or supplE'mental agenda items , if any (23) DI STRICT 6 Consi dera tion of motion to adjourn r·. ')'( -7- (24) DISTRICT 7 Other business and couununications or supplemental agenda i terns, if any (25) DISTRICT 7 / Con sideration of motion to adjourn ~'.~ (26) DISTRICT 11 Consid eration of Re solution No. 79-133 -11, to receive and fi l e bid tabu l ation Roll C~ll Vot e or Cas t and r ecomm en dation and awarding contract for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2 , Unani mous Bnl!ot P . f N l d S I S d k A R 1 · f ~ (27) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (28) (29) ortion o : ew an treet nterceptor ewer an La 'e venue e ie ::>ewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, to John A. Artukovi ch Sons, Inc. and John A. Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture, in the amount of $7 , 488, 964. 53, subject to .receipt of authority to award from the State Water Resources Control Board . See pages "Z" and "AA" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Reso lution No. 79-134-11, approving Agree ment and Grant of Easem ent from the State of California, Department of General Services (Parks and Recreation) for temporary and p e rm anent underground sewer eas ement in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 an d 2, Portion of New l and Street Int erceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No . 11-13-2, and authorizing payment in the amount of $104,000 for said permanent easement a nd $24, 275 for said temporary easement . See page "BB" DISTRICT 11 Other bu siness and co ~u;Qif:ld:,t o\.. su~t;Jn;~l x d~~f any DISTRICT 11 1 V \. Con sideration of motion to ad journ <t ~.S7 . (30) DISTRICT 2 (31) (32) (a) Con s ideration of motion to receive and file r e quest of Monitor Plating & Anodi zing dated August 23, 1979, for relief of fees due in the amount of $4,070.00 for non-compli ance with permit requirements pursuant to the (b) oistri ~J7 nr~~and~oren~ ~ ~:~e~ Consideration of motion to receive and-~~~~~ relative to reque s t of Monitor Pl ating & Anodizin g fee s due. See page 11 DD 11 11 CC 11 ~"· tJ fr:f ounse l's opinion ~ of said (c) Con sideration of action on request of Monitor Platjng ~/no~~ for relief of fees due in the amount of $4,070 .00 ~ lt.4}~ ,, DISTRIC T 2 Other bu s iness and communications or s upplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 2 Con sideration cf motion to adjourn ~ ~ l) f -8- .. (33) DISTRICT 3 (34) (a) Con sideration of motion to receiv e and file request of Maurice Deushane dated August 14, 1979 , for waiver of conn ection fee for property located at the intersectim1 of Valley Hom e and Rand a ll in .the City of La Hab ra See page "EE" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel 's opinion relative to request of Maurice Deushane for waiver of connection fee See pnge "FF" (c) Consideration of action~~,~~quest connection fee ~ DISTRICT 3 of Maurice Deushan e for waiver of Other busine ss and communications or supp l emental age nda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 3 Con s iderat ion of motion to adjourn f ~ 6-v- -9- ~ -1-1 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II ,, . .., County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Co.lif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE SEPTEMBER 12J 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM1 PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION1 STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING.IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests AOJOUP.WAENTS POSTED.= C0~1:P :;, MILEfl.GE .... V.:: ..... . FiL~$ SH Ui' .... tL.: .......... .. ~~~-~-:;:j;\~.'.'~~-~::.'.'..~~~~~ r.rn;i_.: ;·_:'. \"~~;TTEN ..•.. ~ MINUTES i-lLEi> ..... J,L ....... (5) '5°11sidera_9J>n--crriiiotiOn-~tQ__:eceiv':_Ylld--:EiI~mi.Eute excerp_ts, if any see :aSUj>p-lemeHtal ageBela . ----. ----------- (6) EACH DISTRICT (?) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: ('(\ \ S District 1 August 8, 1979, regular District 2 August 8, 1979, regular District 3 August 8, 1979, regular District 5 August 8, 1979, regular District 6 August 8, 1979, regular District 7 August 8, 1979, regular District 11 -August B, 1979, regular ALL DISTRICTS ~R.-Reports of: A/C •••• TKLR -~ Joint Chairman @ General Manager (c) General Counsel ' /(8) \ALL lll S'J'RIC TS (.___/ Commendati on to U tlslcy Parson s f~r hi~ services as Districts' Commissioner and President of the Southern Cal;l.forn1a Coasta l Water Research Project (9) ROLL CALL VOTE ............... . ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll cal l vo te motion ratifying paym e nt of claims of the joint and individunl Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District r epresented, unle ss a Director expresses a desire to vote different ly for any District.) See Pages 11 A11 , 11 13 11 and 11 C11 ALL OISTRJCTS 7/31/79 8/14/79 8/28/79 Joint Operating Fund $ 70,688.29 $ 189,681.30 $ 88,717.46 Capital Outlay Revo lving Fund -38 .. 545 .41 ·1,840,547.22 21,905.80 Joint \forking Capital Fw1d 27, 290. 93 32,755.75 45,461.45 DISTRICT NO. 1 130.58 DIS TRICT NO. 2 1,277.72 760.95 2,562.28 DiSTRI CT NO . 3 362,412.40 6,620.23 6,982.45 DIS'fllJCT NO. 5 ·6,331.46 7 ,501.67 596.16 DISTRICT NO , 6 24 .49 DISTRICT NO. 7 1,160.78 4,051.09 1,894.42 DISTRICT NO . 11 3,029.03 2,991.42 597.02 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 147,665.45 498.48 2,321.45 DI STRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 5.46 3,301.90 5.46 $658,431 .42 $2,088,840.59 $!71,043.95 (10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM S NOS. 10(A) THROUGH ·l0(DD) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discuss ion or further exp lanation a nd unless any particular item is requested to be removed from t h e consent cal endar by a Director, staff member , or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of th ese items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approv in g a ll motions , and casting a unanimous b a llot for resolutions included on the consent calendar . All items removed from the consent calendar s hall be con sidered in the regular order of busin es s. Members consent of the public who wish to r emove an i tern from the calendar s hall, upon recognition by the chair, state '-~~~~~ ;s and desi gn a te by l etter the item to be ITEM NO. lO(b ) t o b e :o nsent calendar . remo ve d f r om c on sent cal en dar ~'1 . s, Rull Ca ll Vote or Cas t Unanimo us Ball ot * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman wi ll determ ine if a ny items are to be deleted from the consent cal e ndar.· Con s id e ra t ion of ric tion to approve a 11 agen da i terns appearing on th e con sent ca l e ndar not s p ecifica lly removed from same . -2- -... ... (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ~.: .... ~ LETTER ············- ALL DISTRICTS \._,) A/C •••• TKLR ··-(a) Consideration of motion authorizing th~ Selection Committee to negotiate with engineering firms for services in connection with updating each District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities (b) (To be considered under Agenda Consideration of Resolution No. 79-119, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding negotiated contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job-No. J-13-2R, to Coy_Atkins in the G:'-~~11) (c) amount of $199,000. See pages "D" and "E" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, granting a time extension of 11 calendar days to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation due to delays caused by delivery of knife gate valves. See page "F" A/C .... TKLR - FILE ·······-·-····· ~t,..-/. ~-·-··- ~~ -- FILE ··-··-·-r.;:;:;r:G> v . / ~-···---·'-'9 A/C~R-~---··-·_v-_____ ___......... FILE.--- ~~ A/C~---.&L ............ ~ (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-120, accepting Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" (.e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, granting a time extension of 52 calendar days to the contract with R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. for delays caused by City approval of street excavation and blackflow prevention device and in securing supplies. See page "H" (f) Consideration of Resolution.No. 79-121~ accepting Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "I" . (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, authorizing an addition of $633.73 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for extra stainless steel angle for work in Secondary Clarifier No. 9. See page "J" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-122, accepting Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "K" (i) Consider~tion of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, authorizing an addition of $1,596.93 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for revised method of shot'ing and.boring operat.ions·dtte to undisclosed piping and duct. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- .. . (10) (CO NSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) FILE ................. . ~R ~----~--- A/C .... TKLR •••• 't\~t!:I~./ .. \ .... .:. ...... --- --··--··-... - F.LE ................ _ L!:TI:"R ----··-··- FILE ............. _._ LETT ERSl i~---· A/C .... TKLR - .!:~-~--~..::::.. ~----~-----·- LETTER ......... -- A/C .... TKLR - ~-~~--~ ~;ff\"Y.'l•-7UA-r,. /FILE ................ _ LETTER ···---··· A/C .... TKLR .... ... u.~~ .. Y.. ,/~'fff~ FILE ............... - LETTER ........... - A/C .... TKLR - "'\ ~ '\ .... \ ,/ .. ~ .. l ... -1~- -·-··········-·-- FILE ................ .. LETTER ------·- A/C .... TKLR - ALL DISTRICTS (Continue d) (j) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 2 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No . PW-074, authorizing an addition of $8,236.36 to the contract with P . R. Burke Corporation for trenching basin floor to complete install ation of r equired pipeline due to undi sc losed obstruction, and granting a time extension of 18 calendar days to complete this work. See page "M" (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-123, accepting Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No . PW-074, as complete, authorizing execut ion of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "N" (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to the plans and spe cifications for Pressure Man hole and Street Repairs Nea r Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW-076, authorizing an addit ion of $2,527 .61 to the contract with Byron L: Crume, Inc. for removal of sewage water from pipeline, including pumpin g, equipment rental, traffic control and a ddi tional excavation and compaction, and granting a time exten sion of 6 calendar days for said work. See page "0" (m) Consideration of Resolution No . 79-124, accepting Pressure Manhole and Stree t Repairs Near Ellis Avenue Pump St a tion, Job No. PW -076, authorizing executi on of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page 11 P11 ~) / (o) (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-125, approving equipme nt specifica- tions for Solids Transport and Processing Equipment for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 2, Jobs Nos. P2 -24-1A, lB and lC, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Se e page 11 Q" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-126, approving plans and specifica- tions for Dewaterin g and Storage Facilities for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-24-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the da te for receipt of bids . See page 11 R" Con s ideration of motion amending Board action of May 9, 1979, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Treatment Plant Facilities Plan providing for preparation of separate Facilities Plan for the Flow Equalization Project, subject to receipt of a Step 1 grant, by deleting the requirement of ·receipt of grant approval (q) Conside ration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for 1~~o (2 ) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161 , Specification No .. R-001, providing detailed specification cl arifications (Bids to be received 9/6) (CONSENT CAL ENDAR continued on page 5) -4- tIO) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) FILE ·--·---- LEr.cR --··· ~ A/C __ TKLR -··· FILE -·-····-··-···- LETTER --·-··-- A/C •••• TKLR -_________ ..-.... -·-·---··----- FILE ·----------- . ~ LETTER --·--· A/C .... TKLR - ~~--- LETTER "116 A/C •••. TKLR \~~---~~,Oµ A/C .. ~ ···········-··------- ···-··----........... Fl~--- ~~ A/C •••• TKLR - FILE ------ LETTER ... -- ,· A~C ]J~TKLR --,0>0'~ QffeJ. v ~~~¥~v I ~ (r) Consideration of motion authorizing travel, lodging and incidental expenditures incurred by the Districts' Chief Engineer in connection with membership on the California Association of Sanitation Agencies fact finding conunittee established· to review problems in the Truckee-Lake Tahoe area '(s) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase to District's Assistant Engineer, Mike Jones, from Range 1058B, Step 2.5 ($1843/mo.) to Range 1058B, Step 3 ($1895/mo.) in recognition of achieving his engineer's registration · (t) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase order to Waukesha Motor Company. for parts to . rebuild Engine No. 8 at "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2 for an amount not to exceed $42,000 plus. tax and freight (u) Consideration of motion approving temporary disposal by the Irvine Ranch Water District or any othe1 .. agency within Orange County of ~5% dewatered digested s~wage solids at the Coyote Canyon landfill site from September 13 to December 13, 1979, at a rate of twice the Districts' cost for processing the solids DISTRICT 2 (v) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Tetsuo and Mitsue Ozaki and Kenneth and Patsy Light for annexation of 1.057 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to Col.Ulty Sanitation District No. 2. s·ee page "S" DISTRICT 3 (w) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Southern California Edison Company dated August 8, 1979, in the amount of $775.27 in connection with construction of the Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and refer to contractor and liability claims administrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-130-5, approving plans and specifications for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "T" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (y) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, authorizing an addition of $6,103.31 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for removal of grouted riprap from invert of Santa Ana River over siphon excavation area, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for completion of said work. See page "U" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) ~E ..... v.=. .... lffiER ·····---··· NC .... TKlR •••• e..t.?. .. L. L ..... -··-···---·- -,/ ~--·············· ~ ..... k .... A/C _TKlR •... )( .._e/?Op:l-:! ti!€'""""-A',£;;') ;t/' ~';.."'"-<i:•-··- A/E ""~KLR ...., I 0:::. .. ".".':.".".".'1.\'l\U"~ FILE ·······-·--, -GF~ . ..J.!:.':/. ·A/C .... TKlR - ..................... ._. ...... FILE ··············-- LETI ER ·······-·- A/C .... TKLR -·· ~-~-~~~:~::::~- ( LETIE R$ ____ .k_ A/C .... TKLR ...• DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (Continued) (z) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re emergency repairs on A-B Trunk .at Plant No . 2 (2) See page "V" Con sideration of motion ratifying action of Chief Engineer in i ss uing purchase order to John A. Artukovich ~ons, Inc . in ··the amount of $tl, 144, 73 for emergency repairs on A-B Trunk (3) Conside ration of Resolution No . 79 -131, approvin g agreement DISTRICT 6 with Sha ller and Lohr, Inc. for engineering s e rvice s r e design of connection of Santa Ana Riv e-r Siphon to Headworks "C" at.. Plant No. 2, Contract No. 5-21-1, for a lump s um f ee of $26 ,000 for Ph ase I and on a per diem fee basis for a n amount not to exceed $7, 500 for Phase I I. See p age 11 1\1 11 (aa) Conside r at ion of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Dover Medical Building Owners, dated August 14, 1979, in the amount of $16,178 . 77 relative to a sewage b a ckup, and refer to the Distri cts' l iability claims administrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 7 (bb) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Ke nneth and Jolene Buchanan ancl Marvin and Marilyn Tovey for annexa tion of .72 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Oran ge , and refer to staff for study and recommendation , propos e d Annexation No . 89 -Buch an an Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be an n exed to the 7th Se wer Mtce. Dist.) See page "X" (cc) Consideration of motion to receive and file Peters Canyon Study prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation and take und e r advisement (copy enclosed with agenda material) (dd) Consi deration of Resolution No. 79-132 -7, approving Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement . (Non -Master Plan) .with Greg Johns on for construction of local sewer line within 7th Sewer ·Maintenance District from the intersection of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive extending approximately 500 feet in Skyline Drive. See page "Y" END OF CONSENT CAL E NDA~ (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items de leted from consent calendar, if any -6 - '1L! ........... -- lETIER ·····--- A/C .... TKL~ '..,./jw.t.~~ 'ie .0 .-...Q ....... ~~ - FILE ....... -·- LETIER .... - A/C .... iKLR •••• ......................... - ............... _ ........ -- (1 2 ) (1 3) ''ti\ c 11 \, -.:> (14) (15) (16) (1 7) ALL DI STR I CTS Consideration of mo tion t o rc c e i_vc , fi l e nnd npprovc Facilities P lan for Wa s tewater Fac ilities -Resolution No . 79-1 36 ALL DISTR I CTS Consideration of motion rati f y i nr. action of Ge n e ra l Ma n ager in filing Application for ~l od iflcat i on of Secondary Trea tment Requiremen ts purs u:mt to Section 30l(h) gf the Cl ea n Wate r Act of 1977 ALI. DISTRICTS Electi o n of Fi s ca l Po li cy Co uun ittec Donald S t r a1:tSs a ~i c de r DI STR I CT 3 Election of Ch a irman pro tern member -Nom inees: Directors El vin Hutchi son , AL L DI STR I CTS Con s ideration of motion to convene in executive session r e personne l matter:; '1 ·~::)_ti'. 5' J ALL DISTRICTS Ot he r bus i ness and commun i cat i ons or supp l ementa l · agenda items ; if any . {J'I'\ \ c . tn:MS ON Cl 7) (a) FILE -· .. -····StJPPLEM[NTAL AG El~DA .._LE;~-~ A/C .... TKLR -- Roll Call VoIP. or Cos t Un anim ous Ballo t Consid cr;iUon of Resolution No. 79-127, to receive and file bid t nbulation and rccommc 11dati o n and a\\'ardin g contr;ict fo r Mod ifications to Odor Sc 1ubbing To11cr at Rccl:?mation Pl:!nt No. l , Job No. l 'W-055-2 , to P. R. Burke Corpo r a tion in the: amu'..mt of $16,939.00. Sec p ages "I" · and "Il" ITEIAS ON .............. S.UPPLEM ENT AL AGENDA llE ··--··--·- (b) Con si uc rnt ion o f Re solution Nn. 79-128, to receive and file bid t abulati on and recor.imcnu3tion and aw:,rding c o ntrac t for 10,00 0 Gallon Fue l Tank Va por Reco".1<'ry S~·stcm at Recl111 ~at i on Plant ~~o. l, J ob ~-V-. ~IC .... iKLR ••.• Ro!I Call Vot e or Cast Una nimo us Ballot No. PW -057 , to Triad Mc chnnical , I nc . i n the amow1t of $3,553.00. Sec pn g<::s "Ill" and "IV" .......................... ITEMS O N (c) Cons ideration of Reso l ut i oa No . 79-129, to receive and fi l e bid tabulati o,1 :md rccor .. mc ndation to reject all bids for Two (2) Climax Gas En gines , Serial Nos. 46 129 and 46161 , Specification No. R-001 , and autho d zi n g t h~ Gcn c rai l·lanagc r to neg oti a te a ~e cont1 act with l':au k csha Engin<' Sc r viccr.ter , Inc. for further consideration by ·A.._: ........ SJ.ll'PlEM ENTAL AG ENDA ~~ ... -..... --. LETI ER --Roll Ca ll Vote or Cas t _,_ U nani mo~s Ball ot Al rKLR -the Boards . Sec pace s "V " and "VI " ···-··-······-·- IT::N.S ON -··· .. -······-·stJPPt::>:.~N T AL AG·ENDA ~-·~···/\~ \;ETIER /9--~ A/C .... TKLR ·-· / 1 '~TE/.1.S ON .. ./:'..'.-'::.s 'tJ pPll!>,\ENT AL J.G ENDA (d) (c) Cor.sicl crat ion of motion au!horizing staff to cni::agc De lphi Systems , In c . for com;1utcr progra r.c11ing changes to cor.1ply with new Orange Coun ty Employees Ret ircr.:e nt Systc;11 change to :1 d u a l retiremc<at p l an effective Scptc1:1b c r 21, 1979, on a per diem ice basis for a total amount not t o cxcc:c:u $5,000. · Con s id e r ati on of Reso lution No. 79-13 5 , approving and auth o ri z ing renewal of agricul tural lcn s c (re Specification No . L-006) for Ren C~ll Vote or Cas t . FILE .. -.. ·-····-·v ~-L , kc / Unan imous 13all ot portion (approximatc lr J .2 acres ) of Di stricts ' intcrp l ar.t r i&ht-of- way ·to Nakasc Rrothcrs for a three-year period beginning Oc tober 1, 1 979, for an annual renta l of $345 , with provision for annual escalation , and authorizing flistrict No. 1 to execute said l eas e in form approved by t he Gcncr:i 1 Counse 1. See page "VII" A/C ~-·T LR -( I . "\. ,J'l,4--\TCI AS ON Jc ':-:7.lf! .... ~lfi.m~NfAL AGEN DA (f) Qr.-;.:v.:~:1-(_ . . . Con s id c-ra tion of :notion authorizinp, staff to proceed with eme rgency repair s to "C" Hcad ••o rks Ge arbox l\o. S at Plant No . 2 on a force account Las is FILE ···-··--- t ETIER -··- A/C .... TKLR - ········-·····-·····- ·············:·-··-- (1 8) DI STR ICT l Other bus iness and c onununication s or supplemental agenda i terns , if any (19) DISTRICT l Con s idera tion of motion to ad journ 9: 5 ~ (20) Dl ST IH CT 5 (2 1) (22 ) (23) Ot h er bus incs.s anc! conununic a tions or s uppleme ntal agen da items, if a ny DI STRICT 5 Co n !'iderat i on of mo ti on to ad j ourn ~'.5<(' DI STR I CT 6 Oth er bu s iness and comm unications or suppleme nt a l agen da items , if any DI STR I CT 6 o·~-" Considera tion of mo tion to adjourn ,r • ....:>~ -7- ' .. (24) DISTRI CT 7 Other bu sin ess and commun jpcations or suppl eme ntal agenda items, if a ny (25) DISTRICT 7 Con s ideration of motion to ad journ cz ·. 55 (26 ) DISTRICT lJ . Consideration of Resolution No. 79 -1 33-11, to receive a nd file bid tabu l a tion Roll c~rr Vote or Cas t and recomme ndation and awarding contract for Coas t Trunk Sewe r Re ac h 1 and 2 Un.i nimous Ball ot . ' • ' ~ / Irort1on of New land Street Interceptor Sewer a nd Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, <(me .:.:,:··--··)' <:?/Contract No. 11-13-2, to John A. Artukovich Sons , Inc. a nd John A. Artukovich, Jr ., @E R-----_J/t Joint Venture, i n th e am ount of $7 ,488,964 .53 , subject to .receipt of authority A/C ... .lKlR ·-to award from t h e State Water Resources Con tro l Board . See pages "Z" and (".:~ .... ~~-~·e')L . 11 AA11 Q .~.~~S TRICT 11 Con siderat i on of Reso lution No . 79-1 34-11, approving Agreement and Gr a n t of P.oU Call Vote or Cast Easement from t h e State of California , Departme nt of General Services un7mous Ballot (P arks and Recreation) for temporary and permanent underground sewer ~' .......... .,..-easement in connection with t h e Coast Trunk Sewe r, Reach 1 and 2 , Portion of ~mR ' .. ~); I:_, Newland Street Int erceptor Sewer a nd Lake Avenue Relief Sewe r, Contract TKtR _ ...__,/No . 11-1 3-2 , and authoriz ing payment i n t h e amo unt of $104,000 for said permanent ~( .. ~~_:.aseme nt and $24 , 275 for sai d t emporary easement . See page "BB" .. ~t.~{'27f}D.I STRICT 11 . "--Ot h er bu s iness and communicati ons or s uppl em e ntal agenda i terns , if a n y (29) DISTR I CT 11 Conside ration o f motion to adjourn ~ '. .S 1 (3 0 ) DIS TR I CT 2 / (a) Con sideration of mot i on to recei v ~ a nd fi l e r equest of Mo nitor , l Anodizing dated August 23 , 19 79 , for relief of fees due in the • 1 \ S $4, 070 . 00 for n on -comp liance with permit requireme nts pursu ant Plating & amoun t of to the ···············-··-Distri cts ' Connection and Use Ordinance . See page "CC" -·················-- (3 1) (32 ) (b) Consideration of motion to receive and fi l e General Co unsel's opinion r e l ative to r e ques t of Monitor Plating & Anodizing for re l ief of said All~ f ees du e . See page "DD" (c) Consideration of action on reque st of Monitor Plating i' /<:;;, i·elief of fee s due in the amo unt of $4 , 070. 00 k-v 't..<, //) DI STR I CT 2 & An odi zin g L'tU-/' Oth er bu siness a n d communi cat ions or supplement a l agenda ite ms, if a ny DISTRICT 2 Con sideration of mot i on to ad journ 'f. t/ -8- fo r (33) DISTRICT 3 (a) Consideration of motion to r eceive and file request of Maurice Deushane dated August 14, 19 79, for waiver o f connection fee for property located • at the intersection o f Valley Hom e and Randall in the City of La Habra See page "EE" " <.._ Fl\E •. ~/" ~ A/C .... l'KLR -(b) Con sideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's opinion rel ative to r e qu est of Maurice De ush ane for waiver of connection fee ·······-··········- ···········-·······-- ., I ::> See page "FF" (c) Consideration of action on request of Maurice Deushane for waiver of /t1 /~ connection fee /.J"'111 ~ (34) DISTRICT 3 Other busines s and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRI CT 3 Con sideration of motion to adjourn -I [ ;!. -9- ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 6, 1979 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled Upcomi~g Meetings: TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 E~XECUTIVE CO.tvlMIT 1rEE MEETING -Tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, September 26th at 5: 30 p .m. ( ?) September October Novemb~r December January Fcb'ruai~y Mar.ch April May June July August September ~( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ~ (714) 540.2910 (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES JOINT BOARD MEETINGS EXECUTIVE COMMI'ITEE MEETINGS Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979 Oct 10, 1979 Oct 25, 1979 Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979 Dec 12, 1979 Non Scheduled Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980 Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980 Mar 12,, 1980 Mar 26, 1980 \_.) Apr 9, 1980 Apr 23, 1930 May 14,, 1980 May 28, 1980 June 11, 1980 June 25, 1980 July 9, 1980 July 23, 1980 Aug l.3' 1980 Aug 27, 1980 Sep 10, 1980 Sep 24, 1980 - · BOARDS OF D fRECTO RS . --County Sanihtion Districts of Orange County, Californ ia II JOI NT BOARDS SUPPLE ME NTAL AGENDA ITEMS SEPTEr~ER 12J 1979 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRI CTS Post Office Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Cod e 7 l 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (17) (a) Consideration of Resolution No . 79 -127, to receive and file bid tabulat ion and recomme ndation and awa rdin g contrac t for Modi fic ations to Odor Scrubbing Tower at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No. PW -055-2 , to P. R. Burke Corporation in the amount of $16 ,939.00 . See pages "I" and 11 II 11 (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-128, to r eceive and file bid tabulation a nd recommenda tion and awarding contract for 10,000 Ga ll on Fuel Tank Vapo r Recovery Sys t e m at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No. PW-057, to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $3 ,553.00. See pages "III" and "IV" (c ) Consideration of Reso lution No . 79-129, to receive and file bid t a bul ation and recomm en dat ion to reject all bids for Two (2) Climax Gas En gines , Serial Nos. 46129 and 46 161, Specifi cation No. R-001, and authorizing the General Manager to negotiat e a purchase contract with Wa uke s ha Eng ine Servic en t er , Inc . for further consideration by the Boards. See pages "V" an d "VI" (d) Consideration of motion authori z ing staff to engage Delphi Systems, Inc. for comp uter programming c h anges to comply with new Or ange County Employees Ret irement System change to a dual retirement p l an effective September 21, 1979 , on a p er die m f ee basis for a total amount not to exceed $5 ,000. (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-135, approving and authorizing renewal of ag ricultural l ease (re Spec ification No. L-006) for portion (approximate l y 1 .2 acres) of Dis tricts ' interplant right -of- way to Nakase Broth ers for a three-year period beginn i n g Oc tob er 1, 1979, for an annua l rental o f $345, with provision for annual escal ation, and authorizing District No. 1 to execute said lease in form approv e d by the Genera l Coun se l. See page "V II" (f) Con sideration of motion au thorizin g s taff to proceed with eme r gency repairs to "C" Hea<.lworks Gearbox No. 5 a t Plant No. 2 on a force account bas is II I II J . RESOLUTION NO. 79-127 Al\'ARDING JOB NO. PW-055-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY ;o CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ODOR SCRUBBING TOWER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-055-2 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to P. R. Burke Corporation for MODIFICATIONS TO ODOR SCRUBBING TOWER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-055-2, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-055-2 be awarded to P. R. Burke Corporation in the total amount of $16,939.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, ~' 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and-sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in fonn approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM No'.· i7(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II I" •i i . B I D T A D U L A T I 0 N Sept. 6·,· 19 7.9-- . 11: 00 P .• M,.--'~-~· ' JOB NO. P\·J-055-2 PROJEC'r 'rITLE MODIFICATIONS TO ODOR -SCRUBBING TOWER AT RECLMQ\.TI0N PLT ·V PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~--~~~--~------------------~--------------- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 15,000.00 REMARKS BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------- -~---~~-~~~----------------------~~----~~---- CONTRACTOR 1. P. ·R. Burke' Corp. 2. 3 • Anaheim,· CA Triad Mechanical, Inc. Stanton, CA TOTAL BID $16,939.00 $18,181~00 4. "II" I have reviewed the proposals received for the above project and therefore recommend award to P. R. Burke Corp. of Anaheim, CA, in the bid amount of $16,939.00, as the lowest and best bid. I concur in the above recommendation to award Job ·No. PW-055-2 Engineer ADENDA ITEM NO. 17CA) -ALL DISTRICTS ".I.I II -. "Ill" RESOLUTION NO. 79-128 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-057 A RESOLUTION OF Tiffi BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 10,000 GALLON FUEL TANK VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-057 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Triad Mechanical, Inc. for 10,000 GALLON FUEL TANK VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-057, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-057 be awarded to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the total amount of $3,553.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGEN"DA ITEM NO. i7(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "III" }) I D 'l' /\ B U l.. I\ '1' I 0 N SHEE'P SPECIFICATION NO. PW-057 Sept. 6, 1979 11:00 l\.K. 10,000 GALLON FUEL TANI< VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM PROJECT TITLE AT RECLAl'1ATION PLANT NO. 1 ~--~~-~-~~~~_...;_;_~__;..-~--~--~~-------~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ENGINEEB 1 S ESTIMATE $. 3, 000. 00 REMARKS BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------- ~--------~-------------~-----~-------------~ BIDDER TO~AL BID 1. Triad Mechanical, Inc. Stanton, CA .$3,553.00 2. P. R. Burke Gorp. . .. Anaheim, CJl .. · $4,539.00 4. . : . I have reviewed the proposals received for the anove project and therefore recommend award to Triad Mechanical, Inc. of Stanton, CA, in the bid amount of $~1 553.00 1 as the lowest and best bid. II IV" AGENDA ITEM NO. 17CB) -ALL.DISTRICTS . \w) "IV" . ~ ' RESOLUTION NO. 79-129 REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR 11~0 (2) CLIMAX GAS ENGINES, SPECIFICATION NO. R-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR 11~0 (2) CLIMAX GAS ENGINES, SERIAL NOS. 46129 AND 46161, SPECIFICATION NO. R-001 * * * * * * * * * * * 1be Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1~ 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on September 6, 1979, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and, WHEREAS, the sole bid received has been evaluated by the Districts' engineers, and the bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately sixty-five (65) percent; and, WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written recommendation that said bid be rejected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That all bids received for said work be hereby rejected; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to negotiate a purchase order contract with Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc. PASSED AND_ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "V" AGENDA ITEM NO. 17(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "V" i• D I D T A B U L A T I 0 N ·sBEE'r . SPECIFICATION NO. R-001 . Sept. 6 1 199~ ....r;;. 11: 00 J\.,M • REBUILD OF T\'\O ( 2) CLIHAX GAS ENGINES 1 SERIAL PROJECT TITLE NO. 46129 & 46161, PROJECT DESCRIPTION -ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 37,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------- REMARKS ~-~~--~--~~-~~~~-~~~~-~~-~~~~-- 1. BII?DER Wauk~sha Engine Servicenter, Inc. Long Beach, CA . -·. .I . • ---. .. ·--· ';1.'0TAL BID $.61, 0·51. 00 I have reviewed the proposal received for the above project V and recommend rejection of the one bid received and that · · "VI II authority be given for a negotiated purchase contract. I concur in the above recommendation to reject bids on this project. ~;~ ,b_ ).c_·( .:< _ { Fred A. Harper, General Manager ,, ·AGENDA ITEM NO. 17Cc) -ALL DISTRICTS Engineer . .: --"VI II RESOLUTION NO. 79-135 APPROVING NEW AGIUCULTUJVU.. LEASE RE INTERPLA~T RIGHT OF WAY lVITJl NAKASE ffiWTHERS (RE L-006) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTi, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTH- ORIZING EXECUTION OF NEW AGRICULTURAL LEASE RE INTERPLANT RIGHT OF WAY WITH NAKASE BROTHERS (RE SPECIFICATION NO. L-006) * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, pursuant to Specification No. L-006, County Sanitation District No. 1 has heretofore entered into a lease agreement with Nakase Brothers for lease of approximately 1.2 acres of interplant right of way for agricultural purposes; and, WHEREAS, the term of said lease will expire September 30, 1979; and, WHEREAS, certain benefits are derived by the Districts as a result of said lease by eliminating maintenance costs on said right of way; and, WHEREAS, a renewal of said lease has been negotiated for an annual rental of of $345.00, wit~ provision for annual escalation of said rental fee; and, WHEREAS, Districts' regulations provide that nominal transactions of less "'-11. .xhan $500.00 do not re.quire competitive quotes or formal bidding procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:· Section 1. That the Agricultural Lease dated wherein ~~~~~~~~~ .. District No. 1 consents to the leasing of approximately 1.2 acres of interplant right of way, which said property is more particularly described in said lease agreement, to Nakase Brothers is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That rental for said property is hereby fixed at $345.00 per annum; and, Section 3. · The annual rental for said lease shall be increased based upon the annual increase in the U. S. Department of Labor -Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (all items) for the Los Angeles - "VII-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 17CE) -ALL DISTRICTS "VII-1" . . ......_ -. -; •---~~-~~ .Long Beach metropolitan area (1967 = 100). For purposes of computing said annual increase the month of July shall be deemed as the base month. Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of t~e Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agricultural Lease on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED ANQ ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "Vll-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 17(E) -ALL DISTRICTS : ;, "Vll-2" -.. ~ ---BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II -· ~ -~\r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE SEPTEMBER 12J 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR . APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if ne~essary (4) Recognition of special guests ~. (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any· See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT (7) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 August 8, 1979, r.egular District 2 August 8, 1979, regular District 3 August 8, .1979, regular "> District 5 -August 8, 1979, regular District 6 August 8, 1979, regular . District 7 August 8, 1979, regular District 11 ;.. -August 8, 1979·, regular ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager ·(c) General Counsel (8) (9) ALL DISTRICTS Conunendation to Lidslcy Parsons for his services as Districts' Commissioner and President of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project r 4 --~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented,·unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See Pages "A" • "B" and "C" ALL DISTRICTS 7/31/79 8/14/79 8/28/79 Joint Operating Fund $ 70,688.29 Capital Outlay-Revolving Fund -38;545.41 Joint Working Capital Fund 27.290.93 DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. S DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT.NO~ 11 DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 &"7 JOINT 1,277.72 362.412.40 ·6.331.46 24.49 1.160.78 3,029.03 147,665.45 S.46 $658~431.42 $ 189,681.30 $ 88.717.46 ·t.840.547.22 21,905.80 32.755.75 45,461.45 130.58 760.9~ 6,620.23 7,501.67 2,562.28 6,982.45 596.16 4,051.09 1,894.42 2,991.42 597.02 498.48 2,321.45 3,301.90 S.46 $2,088,840.59 $i71,043.95 (lOT' AtL UISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 10(A) THROUGH -10(DD) All matters placed upon.the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar.· . Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar·not specifically removed from same. -2- -.;.· . --, (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) (b) (To be considered under Agenda Item No. 11) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with engineering firms for services in connection with updating each District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities Consideration of Resolution No. 79-119, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding negotiated contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job-No. J-13-2R, to Coy Atkins in the amount of $199, 000. See pages "I)" and "E" · Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modification of Existing Slµdge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, granting a time extension of 11 calendar days to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation due to delays caused by delivery of knife gate valves. See page "F" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-120, ac·cepting Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for rire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, granting a time extension of 52 calendar days to the contract with R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. for delays caused by City approval of street excavation and blackflow prevention device and in securing Sl!J'plies. See page "H" Consideration of Resolution.No. 79-121~ accepting Fire Sprinkling Sys·tem for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, as complete, authori.zing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "I" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Reclamation Plant No. l, Job No. PW-072, authorizing an addition of $633.73 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for extra stainless steel angle for work in Secondary Clarifier No. 9. See page "J" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-122, accepting Modifications to ~isting Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "K" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. ~W-074, authorizing an addition of $1,596.93 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for revised method of shol'ing and boring operations·dtte to undisclosed piping and duct. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, authorizing an addition of $8,236.36 to the contract with P. R. Burke Corporation for trenching basin floor to complete installation of required pipeline due to undisclosed obstruction, and granting a time extension of 18 calendar days to complete this work. See page "M" (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-123, accepting Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving. Final Closeout Agreement. See page "N" (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pressure Manhole and Street Repairs Near Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW.-076, authorizing an addition of $2,527.61 to the contract with Byron L: Crume, Inc. for removal of sewage water from pipeline, including pUIJ1ping, equipment rental, traffic control and additional excavation and compaction, and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for said work. See page "0" (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-124, accepting Pressure Manhole and Street Repairs Near Ellis Aven~e Pump Station, Job No. PW-076, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P" (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-125, approving equipment specifica- tions for Solids Transport and Processing Equipment for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 2, Jobs Nos. P2-24-iA, · lB and IC, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "Q" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-126, approving plans and specifica- tions for Dewatering and Storage Facilities for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page . 11 R" (p) Consideration of motion amending Board action of May 9, 1979, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Treatment Plant Facilities Plan providing for preparation of separate Facilities Plan for the Flow Equalization Project, subject to receipt of a Step I grant, by deleting the requirement of ·receipt of grant approval (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 4616~,.spe~ificat~on No .. R-001, providing detail~d specification clar1f1cat1ons (Bids to be received 9/6) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page S) -4- (lb) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (r) Consideration of motion authorizing travel, lodging and incidental expenditures incurred by the Districts' Chief Engineer in connection with membership on the California Association of Sanitation Agencies fact finding conunittee established to review problems in the Truckee-Lake Tahoe area (s) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase to District's Assistant Engineer, Mike Jones, from Range 1058B, Step 2.5 ($1843/mo.) to Range 1058B, Step 3 ($1895/mo.) in recognition of achieving his engineer's registration · (t) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase order to Waukesha Motor Company for parts to rebuild Engine No. 8 at "C" Headworks at Plant No. 2 for an amount not to exceed $42,000 plus. tax_ and freight (u) Consideration of motion approving temporary disposal by the Irvine Ranch Water District or any other agency within Orange County of ~5% dewatered digested sewage solids at the Coyote Canyon landfill site from September 13 to December 13, 1979, at a rate of twice the Districts' cost for processing the solids DISTRICT 2 (v) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Tetsuo and Mitsue Ozaki and Kenneth and Patsy Light for annexation of 1.057 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Timken Road and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 39 -Ozaki Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "S" DISTRICT 3 (w) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Southern California Edison Company dated August 8, 1979, in the amount of $775.27 in connection with construction of the Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and refer to contractor and liability claims administrator for appropriat·e action DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-130-5, approving plans and specifications for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-22, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "T" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (y) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, authorizing an addition of $6,103.31 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for removal of grouted riprap from invert of Santa Ana River over siphon excavation area, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for completion of said work. See page "U" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (Continued) (z) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re emergency repairs on A-B Trunk at Plant No. 2 See page "V" (2) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Chief Engineer in issuing purchase order to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in ·the amount of $4,144,73 for emergency repairs on A-B Trunk (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-131, approving agreement DISTRICT 6 with Shaller and Lohr, Inc. for engineering services re design of connection of Santa Ana River.Siphon to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Contract No. 5-21-1, for a lump sum fee of $26,000 for Phase I and on a per diem fee basis for an amoWlt not to exceed $7 ,500 for Phase II. See page "W" (aa) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Dover Medical Building Owners, dated August 14, 1979, in the amount of $16,178. 77 relative to a sewage backup, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropr~ate action DISTRICT 7 (bb) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Kenneth and \..J Jolene Buchanan and Marvin and Marilyn Tovey for annexation of .72 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Skyline Drive in the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange, and refer to staff for study and reconunendation, proposed Annexation No. 89 -Buchanan Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7_th Sewer Mtce. Dist.) See page "X" (cc) Consideration of motion t·o receive and file Peters Canyon Study prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation and take under advisement (copy enclosed with agenda material) (dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-132-7, approving Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement. (Non-Master Plan) ... with Greg Johnson-for construction o.f local sewer line within 7th Sewer Maintenance District from the intersection of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive extending approximately 500 feet in Skyline Drive. See page "Y" END OF CONSENT CALENDA~ (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Facilities Plan for Wastewater Facilities '--' (13) ALL DISTRICTS . Consideration of motion ratifying action of General Manager·in filing Application for Modification of Secondary Treatment Requirements pursuant to Section 30l(h) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (14) ALL DISTRICTS Election of Fiscal Policy Committee member -Nominees: Directors Elvin Hutchison, Donald Strauss and Harriett Wieder (15) DISTRICT 3 Election of Chairman pro tern (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session re personnel.matters (17) ALL DISTRICTS (18) (19) (20) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-127, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modifications to Odor Scrubbing Tower at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-2, to ·P. R. Burke Corp..m:ation in the amount of $-1.§..,939.00 (See supplemental agenda -Bid opening 9/6) (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-128, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for 10,000 Gallon Fuel Tank Vapor Recovery System at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-057, to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $ 3. 553. 00 (See supplemental agenda -Bid opening 9/6) (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79~129, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Two (2) Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161, Specification No. R-001, to in the amount of $ (See supplemental ~---------___,._,_~~~----=-,.--agenda -Bid opening 9/6) (Bid rec'd exceeds engr 1 s estimate -recommend rejection) DISTRICT 1 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT S Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn -7- (24) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 79-133-11, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lak~ Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, to John· A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. and John A. Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture, in the· amount of $7,488,964.53, subject to receipt of authority to award from the State Water Resources Control Board. See pages "Z" and "M" (27) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 79-134-11, approving Agreement and Grant of Easement from the State of California, Department of General Services (.Parks and Recreation} for temporary and permanent underground sewer easement in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2, Portion of . Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, and authorizing payment in the amount of $104,000 for said permanent easement and $24,275 for said temporary easement. See page "BB" (28) DISTRICT 11 ·Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 2 . (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request of Monitor Plating & Anodizing dated August 23, 1979, for relief of fees due in the amount of $4,070.00 for non-compliance with permit requirements pursuant to the Districts' Connection and Use Ordinance. See page "CC" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's opinion relative to request of Monitor Plating & Anodizing for relief of said fees due. See page "DD" (c) Consideration of action on request of Monitor Plating & Anodizing for relief of fees due in the amount of $4,070.00 (31) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- (33) DISTRICT 3 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request of Maurice Deushane dated August 14, 1979, for waiver of connection fee for property located at the intersection of Valley Home and Randall in the City of La Habra See page "EE" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's op1n1on relative to request of Maurice Deushane for waiver of connection fee See page "FF" (c) Consideration of action on request of Maurice Deushane for waiver of connection fee (34) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda.items, if any (35) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- r· ·- - ·MANAGEr?'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Regular Meeting September 12, 1979 -7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief exp lanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and wh ich are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report , we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or enginee r's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. Joint Boards No. 10-a -Authorizing Selection Committee to Negotiate for Engineering Services re Update of Trunk Sewer System. Included in the 1979-80 Fiscal Year budget for each District is an amount to update the Master Plan for Trunk Sewer Facilities. The facilities, which were set out in the r espective Master Plans have been essentially completed for all Districts. It is the staff's recommendation that the Master .Plan for the respective Distrjcts be updated and that a computer mode ling system be est a blished to determine the availabi lity of sewer capacities and to monitor the industrial discharges .to the system, which is essential for compliance with a modified secondary treatme n t NPDES permit. The staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate with res.ponsible engineering firms that can provide the services required. No . 10-b -. ~ee;otiation of Con s truction Contract for Wnrehouse Of ice Expnnsion. At the Aueust meetin g , the Boards authorized the staff to negotiate a construction contract for the warehouse office expansion (Engineer's estimate, $175,000). This action was taken because after formal advertising of the project, no bids were received on the date esta blished f or the contractors to submit their bid propo sals. The staff has conta cted. four interested contractors and informa l bids were rec e ived on September 5th. Nego- tiations were then conducted with the prospective bidders. It is recorrnnended that the contract be awarded to Coy Atkins in the amount of $199,000. Since this amount exceeds the $175,000 engineer's estimate, this matter will be considered under 'Agenda Item No. 11. No. 10-c -Change Order No. 1 to Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job · No. PW-066-1. This change order is for an extension of time only, and involves no add or deduct to the contract . The extension of time is for 11 calendar days due to delays caused in delivery of the knife gate valves . The staff recommends approval of this change order for time extension only . No. 10-d -Ac·ceptance ·of Job No. PW-066 as Complete. P. R. Burke Corporation, contractor for the Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job ·No. PW-066-1, has completed all specified work and has executed the Final Closeout Agreement. The staff recommends acceptance of this contract and authorization for filing the Notice of Completion at the original contract price of $25,965. No. 10-e -Chan·ge Order No . 1 to Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070 . This change order is for an extension of time only, and involves no add or deduct to the contract. The extension of time is for 52 calendar days due to delays in securing supp lies and the City's approval of traffic control for street excavati on and back flow pre- vention device. The staff recommends approval of this change order for time extension only. No. 10-f -Acc~.t:.?.PC_~---~!= J<?b No. PW-070 as Compl e te. R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc., contractor for the Fire Sprinkle r System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, has completed all specified work and has executed the Final Clo seo ut Agreement . The contractor prosecuted the work but sustained delays in securing materials . The staff recommends acceptance of this contract an d the authorization for filin g the Notice of Completion at the original con t ract price of $19,749. No. 10-g -~hnn gc Ord e r No. 1 to Modific~tions to Existing Launde rs at Secondary Clarificrs, P lant No . 1, JoDNo . PW-072. This change orde r is for an addition to the contract price of -2- $633.73 for extra stainless steel angle material for work in Secondary Basin No. 9. Due to problems encountered by the Districts with respect to supplying this material, the contractor was directed to acquire the material to minimize down time for the Activated Sludge Plant. No time extension is required . The staff recommends approval of this addition to the contract price of $633.73 . No. 10-h -Acceptance of Job No. PW-072 as Complete. P. R. Burke Corporation, contractor for Modifications to Exist- ing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers, Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, has completed all specified work and has executed the Final Closeout Agreement. The contractor diligently prosecuted the work and com- pleted the project 25 days ahead of schedule. The staff recommends acceptance of this contract and the authorization of filing the Notice of Completion. (Original contract bid, $26,940 -Final cost, $27,573 . 73.) No. 10-i -Change Order No. 1 to Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, 'Job No. PW-074. This change order adds $1,596.93 to the contract ~rice for revising the method of shoring and boring operations as initially quoted due to underground piping and duc.ts not shown on the plans . ..._., No time extension is required for this change order. The staff recommends approval of this addition to the contract price of $1, 596 .. 93. No. 10-j -Chang~ Order No. 2 to Job No. PW-074. This change order adds $8,236.36 to the contract price for additional time and materials required to trench the basin floor to complete installation of required pipeline . This additional work was due to an obstruction not shm·m on the plans which was encountered during the boring operation. This change order includes a time ex- tension of 18 calendar days. The staff recommends approval of this change order. No. 10-k -Acceptance of Job No. PW-074 as Complete. P. R. Burke Corporation, contractor for the Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, has completed all specified work and change order work and has executed the Final Closeout Agreement. The staff recommends acceptance of this contract and the authorization for filing . the Notice of Completion. (Original contract bid, $26, 664 Final Cost $36,497 .29). -3- ·No. 10-1 -Chan ge Order No. 1 to Pressure Manhole and Street Repair Near Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW-076. This change order is for the removal of sewage water from the pipeline including the pumping, equipment rental, traffic control, and additional excavation and comp a ction ~ithin Ellis Avenue. This change order is an addition of $2,527.61 and a time extension of 6 calendar days to the contract . The staff recommends approval of this change order. No. 10-m -Acceptance of Job No. PW-076 as Complete . Byron L. Crume, Inc., contractor for the Pressure Manhole and · Street Repair near Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW-076, has completed all specified work and has executed the Final Closeout Agreement. The staff recommends acceptance of this contract and the authorization for filing the Notice of Completion . (Original contract price $14,500 -Final Cost $17,027.61). No. 10-n -~proving Plans and Specifications for Solids Trans- pbrt and Processing Equipment, Job No. P2 -24-1A. As a part of the Solids Digestion and Dewatering Facilities to be constructed at Plant No. 2, the construction grant includes solids transport and processing equipment. This equipme nt is necessary to transport the digested dewater e d solids to the Coyote Canyon Pro-"'-' ces sing Site as well as the equipment needed to process the sludge in this location. This grant includes nine conventional truck-tractors and eight tandum dump semi-trailers, a water truck, two composting machines, a motor grader, a track-type tractor loader and an elevated scraper. The estimated cost for this equipment is $1,273,000, 87~% funded by the State and EPA grants . No. 10-o -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Solids Dewatering Facili.ties at Plant No . 2, J ob No. P2-24-2. The design engineer has completed the design of the solids dcwat ering facilities. The plans and specifications have been for- warde d to the State Water Resources Control Board for g rant approval. Our staff i s recommending approval of these plans and spe cifications and requests that the Boards authorize the General Manager to estab - lish the d a te for re~eipt of bids after approval to advertise is obtained from the State staff. Estimated cost, $10 million. No. 10-p -Amendin?, Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Treatment Plant Faciltties Plan . I~ May, the Districts engage d John Carollo Engineers to prepare a separate Facilities Plan for the flow equalization project which -4- I . ·. was to have been grant funded. In approving the agreement with John Carollo Engineers, we made it subject to receipt of a Step I grant because, at that time, the flow equalization project had been agreed to by State and Federal representatives. Now that the State has refused to allow the project to proceed on a Ne g ative Environmental Declaration, the Step I grant will not be forthcoming. John Carollo Engineers has completed their assignment but payment cannot be made unless the requirement of grant approval is deleted. No. 10-r -Authorizing Payment of Expenses for CASA Committee Assignment. During the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) August Conference in Monterey, a fact-finding committee was established by the CASA President to review some problems that the South Tahoe Public Utilities District and the Tahoe-Truckee Sanita- tion Agency are having on water quality issues with the Re g ional and State Water Resources Control Boards which could have Statewide consequences. Joint Chairman Fox accepted District membership on the committee. The item appearing on the agenda authorizes payment of expenses incurred by the Districts' Chief Engineer in connection with this assignment. No. 10-s -Granting One-Half Step Increase to Assistant ·Engineer for Successful Passage of Eng ineers' Re g istration Examina- tion. Mike Jones, an assistant engineer with the Districts, assigned to the construction management team at Plant No. 2, has received notification from the State Civil Engineering Registration Board of his successful passage of the recent examination. He is now a registered engineer in the State of California. In keeping with past Board policy, the staff:,recommends a one-half step increase from Range 1058B, Step 2.5, $1843/month to Range 1058B, Step 3, $1895/month. No. 10-t -Overhaul of Eng ine at Plant No. 2. The No. 8 Waukesha sludge gas engine located at Plant No. 2 in the "C" Headworks was put into service in 1969 and had one minor "topside" overhaul in 1973. It is now due for a complete major overhaul .. having run some 74,000 hours since new. The engine presently is rated 350 HP having 5700 cubic inch displacement. It is possible to chan g e the displacement to 7040 cubic inches and uprate to 416 HP by purchasing the proper parts which .will be required for the major overhaul at approximately the same cost as the smaller displacement parts. This proposed uprating will increase the reliability of our -5- pumping capabilities which is essential for peak wet-weather flows, at very little additional cost. It is recommended that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate with Waukesha Engine Service Center for th~ r equired engine p arts at a cost not to exceed $42,000 plus sales tax and freight. No. 10-u Canyon Solids osal of Dewatered Slud e at Co ote y Irvine Ranch Water District When the Districts established the sludge processing site at the County 's landfill operation, it was mutually agreed with the County Board of Supervi so rs, County GSA Office, State Solids Waste Management Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board that the site would also be made ava ilable for the processing of dewatered digested so lids from other wastewater agencies with in Orange County. The Irvine Ranch Water District h as requested that they be allowed to haul digested dewatered sludge to the Districts' facilities for processing . The staff has been preparing a report to determine the equitable cost that other agencies should pay for · the services to be provided by the Districts. Much of the data is still to be collected from the LA/OMA staff as well as our own accounting department regarding operating costs at the Coyote Canyon site. The staff report is not scheduled to be completed prior to December ls t. · In the interim, we recommend that the IRWD or any other agency within Orange County be allowed to dispose of their digested dewa tered .sludge until December 13th at a rate of twice the Districts' cost of operation per yard of material processed. This charge is con- sistent with ac cepting wastes from outside the Districts on a temporary basis. District No. 5 No. 10-x -Approving Plans and Specifications for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 5-22. The design engineer has completed the design of the replace- ment of a portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. The staff is recommending approva l of t~e plans and specifications and the soliciting of competitive bids, with the bid date to be established by the Ge neral Manager after obtaining all approvals. (Engineer's estimate, $625,000). Districts Nos. 5 and 6 No. 10-y -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 5-21, Santa Ana Rive r S'iphon. Albert W. Davies, Inc., was directed to r emove grouted riprap -6- from the invert of the Santa Ana River over the siphon excavation area. Upon completion of the trench backfill, lo ose riprap was replaced in acco rdanc e with the County EMA requir ements. The additional cost to complete this item was $6,103.31 in time and material. Included in this change order is a time extension of 5 calendar days. The staff recommends a pproval of this change order. No. 10-z -Emergency Repairs to A-B Trunk Serving Districts Nos. 5 and 6. On August 17th, a section of 54-inch reinforced concrete pipe failed on the A-B Trunk Sewer at Plant No. 2. A staff report is included in the agenda supporting material describing t he prob lem and the action t aken by the staff to make emergency repairs . A subsequent inspection of the manholes within the plant grounds h as revealed that major repairs must be undertaken . The staff has requested a proposal from the engineering firm of Shaller .and Lohr, Inc., for the preparation of plans and specifications to replace the A-B Trunk system within Plant 2. The actions appear - ing on the agenda ratify the emergency r e pair expenditures and approve an agreement with Shaller and Lohr, Inc., for engineering services for design of the connection of the new Santa Ana River siphon to the headworks at Plant 2. The staff recommends approval . ,._, ·District No. 7 No. 10-cc -Peters Canyori Sewerage Feasibility Report . In November, 1978, the Board, acting . upon a request from The Irvine Comp a n y , authorized Boyle Engineering Inc., to prepare a feasibilit y study for the purpose of the District serving the Peters Canyon drainage area . After severa l months of study by Boyle Engine e ring , th e preliminary report has been completed and sub- mitted to The Irvine Company for their review. Included with your agenda material is a copy of this r eport . (The Irvine Company is reimbursing th e District for the cost of the r epo rt) . It is the staff 's recommendation that the rep ort be received and filed a nd th at a special study session be scheduled in October to discuss th e ramifications of serving the Peters Canyon area. The Irvine Comp a ny h as indicated their interes t in annexation of areas to be served within the Cities of Orange , Tustin and Irvine. No. 10-dd -Authoriz a tion to Enter Into a Reimbursemen t ·Agreement for Non -Master Plannea Sewer . Mr. Gre g Johnson, 1781 Skyline Drive , Santa Ana, in the unincor- porated area of north Tustin, h as constructed a local sewer for -7- the 7th Sewer Maintenance District . It has been the policy of ....,,,, the Board that when an owner builds a local public sewer which benefits more than one property, the District will collect a pro rata share of benefitting properties at the time the sewer permit is issued and that a portion of the cost is refunded .to the in- staller of the local sewer. This sewer which extends from the intersection of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive for approxima tely 500 feet on Skyline Drive benefits two properties in addition to the property owned 'by Mr. Greg Johnson. It is the staff's recom- mendation that a Reimbursement Agreement be entered into with Mr. Johnson to collect the fees of the benefitting property owners in a .form approved by the General Counsel. Joint Boards No. 12 -Approval of Facilities Pla n for Wastewater Facilities. The Facilities Plan which sets forth a program to meet the needs of the Districts' service area as · well as the State and Federal discharge requirements has been in preparation for the past four years. The finalization of the Facilities 'Plan was deferred for a lengthy period of time because of the uncertainty of modifications to the secondary tre atment waiver requirements established by the EPA. Meetings held with representatives of the EPA during the latter ·part of 1978 indicated that the Facilities Plan should be adopted with a program to provide the facilities to .meet the full secondary treatment requireme nts. The staff has completed the Facilities Plan which states that the Districts will commit to construct the faci lities required to meet NPDES Permit limitations. The Facilities Pl an sets forth a detailed analysis of the alternatives necessary to meet full secon- dary treatment requirements. There is also a discussion of the facilities requir ed to mee t a modified (waiver) NPDES Permit. If the Districts are successful in obtaining a waiver as provided in Section 30l(h) of the Clean Water Act of 1977, only those facilities requir e d to meet this level of treatment would be constructed. The adoption of the Facilities Plan is a requirement of filin g of the application for a waiver to modify secondary treatment requirements. The staff recommends approval of the Facilities Plan. No. 13 -Authority to Submit Application for Modification of Secondary Trentment Requirements. The staff, in conjunction with K. P. Lindstrom & Associates, and John Carollo Engineers, has comple te d the application for modification o ·f · secondary treatmen t . The application requests a modific ation of ~0/30 requirements for BOD and SS but endorses the State of California Ocean Plan for discharge of wastewa ters to -8- . . the marine environment. As previously reported, with the g ranting of the waiver, th e Districts would realize a savings of over $100,000,000 in capital investment pro grams, as well as considerable savings on the annual operations and main ten ance cost of full secondary treatment. Because the application h ad to be mailed to Washington, D .C . on or before September 13th, the staff is r eques t- ing ratification of the General Manager's action in transmitting this application prior to the September Board meeting. No. 16 -Executi ve Session re Pers onne l Matters . Meet-and-confer sessions have be gun with Op era tions and Maintenanc e personnel representatives concerning salaries and fringe benefits. The staff will report on the discussions to date in executive session. The current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) expires Novembe r 29th for the Operations and Maintenance personnel. The other recogniz ed emp loyee groups have MOUs which con tinue in force another year to December, 19 80. No. 17-a -Award of Contract for Job No. PW -055 -2 . . Publ ic bids will be received on September 6th for the Modifi - cations to Odor Scrubbing Tower at Reclamation Plant No. 1. If the low bid i s satisfactory, the staff will be recomme nding award of the contract at We dnesday 's meeting. A bid tabul at ion and recom- mendation wi ll appear on the supplemental ag enda at the meeting. The engineer's estimate is $15,000. No. 17-b -Aw a rd of Contract for Job No . PW-057 . Bids will be r ece ived later this week for a Vehicle Fuel Tank Vapor Reco very· System at Reclamation Plant No . 1. If the low bid is satisfactory , the staff will be recor:nmending award of the contract at Wedne sday 's meeting . A bid tabul ation and r e commendation will appear on the supplemental agenda. The engineer's estimate is $3,000. No. 17-c -Award of Contr ac t for Specification No. R-001. On S eptembe r 6th, bids will be r eceived for Rebuilding Two Climax Gas Engines, Serial Nos. 46129 and 46161. These engines will be used in the rehabilitation of the Plant No . 1 he adwo rks later this fiscal y ea r. If the low bid is sati sfactory, the staff will be recommendin g award of the contra ct at Wednesday's meeting. A bid tabul at ion and recommendation wil l appear on the supplemen tal agenda. The engineer's estimate is $37,000. -9- District No. 11 N6. 26 -Award of Coast Trunk Sewer. Bids were received .on August 9th for the project known as the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer. Five bids were received ran g ing from a low of $7,488,964.53, submitted by John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., and John A . Artukovich, .Jr ., a joint venture, to a high of $10,817,297. The Districts have applied to the State and EPA for a grant for this project and it is requested that the Board authorize the General Mana g er to award this contract to the low bidder, in the amount of $7,488,964.53, upon receipt of Approval to Award from the State Water Resources Control Board. (Engineer's estimate, $7,500,000). No. 27 -Acceptance of Easement from State · Parks and Recreation re Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract 11 -1 3-2. At the February meeting, the Board authorized the Genera l Counsel to engage a real estate appraiser for the appraisal of a proposed easement for the Coast Highway Trunk, Reaches 1 and 2 (Contract No. 11-13-2) along the abandoned Pacific Electric right o f way of the Huntington Beach State Park. The Sta te reque s ted the .apprais a l in ord e r that a fair mark e t value could be esta blished for the easeme nt. Th e State has subs e quently appro v ed the a ppraisal ~ submitted by the Districts and has agreed to the value set by the appraiser as follows: 30' Permanent Easement 100' Temporary Con s truction Easement TOTAL $104,000 . 24' 2 7 5 $128,275 The staff is recommending that the Board direct the Gen e ral Manager to acc e pt the e a sement from the State at th e above compen - sation. It s hould be noted that this prop e rty acquisition is non-grant fund a ble according to EP A and State regulations. Fred A. Harper General Manager -10- ( SUMMARY OF iHE GANU INITIATIVE--PROPOSITION 4 PROPOSED ARTJ.GLE XIII-8 CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION The Limitations [Sec. l] The total annual ap- propriations of the state or any entity of local government ·shall. not exceed the appropriations ~ limit of the prior year. subject to adjustments for cost of living and population and as provided in Sect ion 3. (Sec. 3] specifies adjustments: (a} if government entities trans~ fer financial responsibility they shall agree on a corresponding transfer of appropriations limit 1 (b') if the transfer ls to a pri- vate entity, the appropriations limit shall be lower "accordingl~," and (b'') if there is a change in the source of revenue from which government services are pro- vided, so as to use license or user fees instead of other reve- nues, the appropriations limit shall be lowered "accordingly." (Sec. 4) Appropriations limit may be set tor any new govern- ment entity or changed for any existing entity by vote of tho electors. The vote is effective for not more than four years. [Sec. 5] Each entity may estab- lish contingency, unemployment, reserve, retirement. sinking fund. trust or similar funds it deems "raasonable.11 [Sec. 6] If the state mandates a new program or higher level of service by 1oca1 government 1 ·it shall provide a new subvention of funds to reimburse the costs. · The Interpretation [Sec. 3) (c) The appropriations limit may be exceeded in an 11 emergency provided that the excess appropriation for any year is offset by reducing appropriations limits in the following three years. [Sec. 5) (sentences 2 and 3) Withdrawals ftorn or interfund transfers between the funds permitted by' Section 5, are not appropriations sub- ject to limitation, but contributions from proceeds bf taxes are appropriations subject to limitation. [Sec. 6] The state may, but need not provide a new subvention to local government for(') the cost of mandates requested by the local agency. {'')costs related to definition or redefinition of crimes, or (111 ) mandates enacted before 1975 or to implement legislation enacted before 1975. Section S(a) and 8{b} clarify that any of these new subventions, if given, will count as.part of the state ~Qropriations subject to limitation. but not as·part of the local !~riations subject to limi· !!ll2!1·. . [Sec. 7) This Article is not to imfair the ability of state or local government to "meet its obligations 1 toward bonded indebtedness. [Sec. 8] (a) State appropriations subject to limitation mean any authori- zation to expend during a fiscal year the state proceeds of taxes except for the purposes of (1 ) present subventions to local government, ('')tax refunds, and(''') payments from retirement, unemployment, and disability insurance funds. (b} Local appropriations subject to limitatiori'mean any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the local rocceds of taxes and present state subventions, excepting only refunds of taxes. c Proceeds of taxes means all tax revenues; all proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges. and user fees in excess of the "costs reasonably borne 11 by the re- ceiving entity is providing the regulation, product or service; and proceeds from the investment of tax revenues. [Sec. 9] A ro riations sub·ect to limitation do not include (a) debt service, (b appropriations essent1al to comp y with court and federal mandates, (c'} appropriations of any special district whose ad valorcm tax 1 evy. in 1977 /78 did not exceed $0.125/$100 A. V. 1 and (' '') appropri a- t ions o·f any special district which is totally funded by other than the proceeds of taxes. [Sec. 8] (g) Debt service means interest and redemption charges, including required reserve and sinking fund deposits, on indebtedness existing or legally authorized as of January 11 1979 1 or·on bonded indebtedness subsc· quently voted by the electors. [Sec, S] (e) Cost of living means the CPI, U.S. Dept. of Labor. but the year-to-year increase in cost of living shall not exceed the change in California per c~pita personal income. ( The Implementation [Sec. 11) This Article will become effective July 1, 1980. [Sec. 2] Revenues received in ex- cess of appropriations permitted by this Article shall be returned through revisions of tax rates or fee sched- ule within the two following fiscal years. [Sec. 8] (h) For 1978/79 the !2:. propriations limit shall be the total of the appropriations sub- ~ect to limitation for 1978/79 1 this makes 1978/79 the bench mark for measuring subsequent ch~nges in appropriations). All state sub- ventions for 1978/79 are deemed lo have been derived from proceeds of llill· Prepared August 1979 by BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES Municipal Financing Consultants 100 Bush Street San Francisco, California 94104 . . . > • ·"' .. ; .. THE GANN INITIATIVE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT By Raymond K. O'Neil, Vice President Bartle Wells Associates ' Municipal Financing Consultants San Francisco Prepared for California Association of Sanitation Agencies Annual Work Conference August 24, 1979 On N ov~mber 6, 1979, Californians who go to the polls will vote on 11 Proposition 4, Limitation of Government Appropriations." That is the official ballot title for the Gann Initiative which was successfully cir- ... culated by a group calling itself the "Spirit of 13, Inc. 11 Between now and November there will be a lot of publicity· on Proposi- tion 4.. Its proponents will promote Proposition 4 as a logical and nec- essary complement to Proposition 13 which passed 17 months earlier. Proposition 13 restricts the inflow of revenues from property taxes; Proposition 4 restricts the outflow of government funds through the ap- propriation process. Note that although the two propositions are spiritually related, they ··function very differently. Proposition 13 assaults government spendini;r from the rear, by cutting one supply route--property taxes. It offereq an immediate and large bonanza to those voters who happened to own property, but it did not reduce other forms of ·taxation.. Proposition 4 assaults government spending from the front by restricting its rate of advance.. It offers no bonanza, and restricts taxation only indirectly through the budgetary process of matching income to a restricted amount . of expenditures. · · The spiritual semblance can be seen, however, in several ways. Neither proposition attempts to assure a continuity of public service; neither leaves much legislative discretion in ~atching .the level of service to social needs or turns of the economy; neither places any importance on renewing and replacing public facilities for the benefit of ·future genera- tions. They are united in being anti-government and anti-tomorrow. But these philosoplical attitudes are not the focus of this paper. Nor do I want to npeculate· on whether or not Proposition 4 will. pass. Rather I want to focus on how Proposition 4, if passed, would aff cct those re- sponsible for serving the public. That's not an easy job. 1 ...... Each person who reads the proposition will read it throu~Jh his own eyes--some as disgruntled taxpayers, some more silently as satisfied taxpayers, some us accountants, some as administrators, some seedy types as consultants, and all too many as lawyers. Each will have his own interpretation, his own emphasis. Most, however, will not read through the proposition at all, and will be spared the risk of guessing at its meaning. To make it a little more readable, I've dissected it into three parts, something like a bug. o It has a head and a tail, and that's all most people will se.e. The head of Proposition 4 is made up of limitations,· prominently placed up front in Sections 1, 3, 4, and 5. It appears friendly enough. Appropriations are to be limited, but they can be increased with population and the cost of living. People can vote additional ap- propriations. Reasonable. funds can be set up for contingencies and emergencies. · o It's tail is also prominent. Section 11 at the end gives an effective date, and Section 2 is a highly visible reference to returning ex- cessive revenues. These are impl.eme.ntation clauses. o Proposition 4 also has a middle section which is very large in size, but easy to ignore because it is obtusely written and disorganized. However, this .is the interpretative section, which gives meaning to the limitation. · · As you can see from the attached exhibit, our bug has a small head, a smaller tail, and a very large middle. The guts, pardon the expres- sion, are in the middle, not in the head. If you look at the exhibit you will see that I've underlined two key terms which recur again and again: "appropriations limit 11 (or "appro- priations subject to limitation") and "proceeds of taxes. n These terms are the soul of the initiative. They are defined along with a number of other terms in Section 8 and 9, part of the large middle section which few readers ·will even scan. I hope you vvill not be among thos.e whose attention wanders somewhere around the middle of Section 5 .. If you read on, thoughtfully, you will begin to see questions and seek answers like the one's I'm going to present in the middle section of this paper, starting now. How ·is the a:epropriations limit determined? In common usage an ap- propriation is the act of setti:ng apart, or assigning to a ·particular use or person, in exclusion of all others; as of money to carry out some public object. (Webster's quoted in 80 Cul 220.) Words in a constitutional amendment should be given their natural and ordinary meaning (35 Cal App 3d 473). However, apparent ambiguhies may be resolved by contcmperaneous construction of the Legislature (20 Cal 3d 765). In addition the ballot nrguments and analysis presented to the electorate may be helpful in resolving uncertain language (33 Cal 2d 564). 2 , . .-' . . - .- Except for the first citation, all of these references arc from the state Supreme Court's recent review of Proposition 13. They suggest that the court is not bound by any "accountin(J" definition, or by previous legislation in giving meaning to the word "appropriations. 11 · Nevertheless, I am reluctant to ignore the meaning of appropriations . as "found in the present Government Code. The Supreme Court may adopt this meaning as "ordinary" or the Legislature may act to impute to Proposition 4 the definitions already codifi.ed. The Government Code generally requires local agencies, including cities and special districts, to adopt and file an annual budget by August 30 (Section 53901). The act of adopting the budget becomes on act of appropriation (Section 29092). The individual totals for the budget items become the appropriations. In this usage an appropriation is an estimate of annual expenditures (on either a cash or accrual basis) together with obligations to be in- curred (Section 39001, 39001. 5). Appropriations not expended or en- cumbered within the fiscal year lapse and revert to the fund balance available for later appropriation (Section 29143). However, Proposition· 4 does not limit individual appropriations or even the aggregate amount of all appropriations. It limits only the total of appropriations funded by "proceeds of taxes," which it defines in Sec- tion 8(c), and by present state "subventions," which it does not define. To find your appropriations limit you will have to review your year-end financial statement for 1978/79. Your appropriations limit for that year appears to be the sum of the fallowing: · 1. Your total proceeds from taxes of all kinds, less any taxes collected spec.ifically for debt service as defined in Section 8(g). · 2. Your total revenue from regulatory licenses and service fees less all charges allocated as a cost of providing the regulation or service. 3. Your total revenue from the state as grants, aid, and subsidies of all kinds . This formula assumes that any of the above revenues not actually spent in 1978/79 were either encumbered or transferred by appropriation to a contingency fund. If they were carried forward as an addition to a general fund or enterprise fund balance, the appropriations limit has to be reduced by the amount carried forward. · If your accounting system wasn't sophisticated enough to identify the cost of providing regulations for which you collected a license fee, or the cost of service for which you collected user charges or user fees, you have two problems. One, you have to go buck and make a reason- able reallocation of your 1978/79 costs so you can find your appropria- tions limit for that year. Two, you have to revise your accounting systems to allocate a 11 cos ts properly chargeable to regulations and services, and to document that allocation. 3 :: .. In this respect, single purpose special districts have an advantage. All their costs are allocable to sewerage or water service as the case may be. Multipurpose districts, counties, and cities have a more dif-'...._; ficult burden. They have to allocate general and administrative costs among different activities and services. Many, if not most, have never' allocated all such costs among their operating departments or enterprise funds. Under Proposition 4 they can no longer afford nQt to charge a full overhead burden against services and regulatory functions for which a f ce is charged. Isn't there an element of chance in finding the a2_propriations limit? Yes, there are two ways m which chance may play a role. First, by picking a particular base year, Proporition 4 makes the events of that year, 1978/79, more decisive than they may have seemed. For example, · if you received a state "subvention u for 1978/79, and spent or encum- bered it, your appropriation limit is higher by that amount than it would have been without the '·'subvention. 11 • Since Proposition 4 ·doesn't tell us what a subvention is, we are left to the general rules of construction which I cited earlier. The natural and ordinary meaning of subvention as given by Webster's (3rd New International) is a subsidy from a government. A subsidy is further· defined as a grant of funds or property to assist in the e·stablishment or ··support of an enterprise deemed advantageous to the public. The State Attorney General has defined subvention as a payment by which one entity of government subsidizes a service provided by another entity of government. ·· I see nothing in these definitions which requires a narrow interpretation of the word subvention so as to restrict it to oper·ating aid. I believe that the state funded portion of any clean water grant is a state sub- venUon. If you happened to get one in 1978/79, you are a winner in the game of Constitutional Keno. The second element of chance in finding your appropriations limit is an element of risk. ·your allocation of costs, in determining the cost of service, is subject to challenge. H01t'1ever, ·I do not believe that your exposure is a serious one. Proposition 4 allows you to deduct all "costs reasonably borne" in pro- viding the regulation, product or service. That language invites your exercise of professional judgment. Unless that judgment is so conspic- uously abused as to be arbitrary and capricious, it will withstand court challenge. The real risks are the costly nuisances of (a) having to memorialize every allocation in sufficient detail that you can recall it, and (b) of having to respond to legnl harassment if someone doesn't like your judgmE;nt. How ar~~~pital costs treated _under Proposition 4? There appear to · nethrce different answers depending on the source of funds. l J . . .._, 1. If the project is reasonably necessary to the provision of a service ~ or regulatory function for which fees arc collected, the fees can 4 • I..._,) be set to pay the capital coat and can be used for thnt purpose. The only limitation on the use of fees is that they he used to pay "costs reusonably borne" in providing the regulation, product or ~ervice. · In the exhibit you will find this language and several similarly vague terms set off by quotation marks. This kind of vague lcm- guage is permitted in c·onstitutional provisions even though similar language might invalidate a penal law. B:y nature constitutions paint with broad strokes and leave room for interpretation. . . ·-I've already discussed the latitude in the work "reasonable.,." so I'll turn· now to the word "costs. n Certainly in ·ordinnry ·usage costs include capital as well as operating costs. If I asked a sales- man how much a car costs, he might point to the sticker price, or say so much a month, or talk about gasoline mileage. In any of these senses--capital cost, loan amortization, or O&M we would ·be talking about cost. Nothing in Proposition 4 itself says that it means one kind of cost but not another. I conclude, therefore, that you can charge off auainst fee income any kind 0£ cost related to the production of that income, at least on a pay;..as-you-go basis. I'll talk later about debt financing. The difficulty with pay-as"".you-go financing for large long-lived projects is that it puts all .the capital cost of future-use on present users. It discourages building for tomorrow. · 2. If the source of capital is current reve·nuc but not fees related to the project, then the project has to be financed within your appro- priations limit. (I'm again passing over the option of debt financ- .ing.) If your appropriations in 1978/79 included a capital outlay from -proceeds of taxes, state grants or net utility revenues, you may have some headroom to make further capital appropriations. However, if you had prudently built up a. capital outlay fund and withdrawn from it in 1978/79, the amount withdrawn wns not an "appropriation subject to limitation." You have been too conser- vative to ·win at Constitutional Keno. 3. If you intend to pay for a project from a reserve or capital outlay fund you may do so. However, if you wish to replenish the fund from taxes, state grants or net utility revenues, you will have .to . fund the replenishment from within your appropriations limit. Section 5 does permit you to replenish the fund from utility reve- nues or regulatory fees to the extent that the project' is chargeable as a cost of the regulation, product, or service. In other ·words you can replenish reserves used to finance the capital cost of serv- ices for which you bill. But if you are a city you could ill afford to deplete reserves to build a police or fire station; nor could you as a county easily replenish funds used to build a jnil or a juvenile hall. ,. . 5 ; How docs Pr~~si~ioJ:>-4 affect ~he issunncc of bond~? Here a~rain ~here appear to be several answers depending on the type o.f bond and its .. r. ~~ -.. time of authorization. I will start with the subject. of bonds outstanding ~ as ~f January 1, 1979. 1. · Proposition 4 is not to impair any government entity from "meeting its obligntions" with respect to bonded indebtedness .. That is. es- sentially an assurance that general obligation and revenue bonds, voted or unvoted, but authorized by January 1 will he pnid. Money raised to pay debt service on these issues is outside the appropria- tions limit. Arguably any net ·utility revenue raised to supply 11 coverage 0 under the terms of a revenue bond issue is also outside the appropriations limit even if it exceeds the "cost" of service. This is a point which the Legislature could clarify if Proposition 4 passes. Historically the impairment of con tract clause of the Federal Constitution has protected revenue covenants. Payments on lease revenue bonds are a different matter. Generally they are not debt service under California law. They are rent paid for facilities, that is, an operating cost payable under ·a long- term agreement. Under Proposition 4 such payments ·would be c;>utside the appropriations limit only to the extent that the rental is charge- able to a fee supported regulation, product, or service and paid from the fees collected. If all or part of the rent relates to non-fee activities, Proposition 4 requires that part of the rent to be paid from within the appropriations limit. Proposition 4 like Proposition 13 certainly weakens the security behind lease revenue bonds for non- fee facilities, but it doesn 1t destroy the .obligation to pay the bonds. \.,,) 2. Let me now talk about new bond issues, those authorized after ·January 1, 1979. Proposition 4 specifically protects bond service on vote:l bonds. That is, bond service on voted bonds falls out- side tJrn appropriations lirnit. But Proposition 4 does not prohibit nonvoted bonds. Two examples of nonvoted bonds are bonds issued under the 1933 Sewer Revenue Bond Act and certain 1941 I.aw Revenue Bonds issued by joint powers sewerage agencies acting under a cease-and desist order. Both of these forms of nonvotcd bonds are enterprise bonds payable from utility revenues. They are payable solely from fees for a product or service. Debt payment on these bonds appears to be a cost of service, and therefore not subject to the appropria- tion limit. In summnry, Proposition 4 doesn't seem to affect revenue "bonds,· old or new, whether voted or not. It does not say they nre not ·bonded indebtedness. It does not say they may not be issued. It does not say they cnnnot be paid from foes for a product or service. Common usage would allow rcpaymE~nt of borrowed money as a "cost reasonnbly borne" in providing a product or service. There is nothing in the word "cost" which implies that you can charge off only depreciation, bond principnl, or some amount less than bond service. If the uuthors had int.C!ndecl to define cost to exclude bond service thc~y could easily have done so. 6 . "-" With respect to lease revenue bonds also, the situation for new issues is the smnc as for old issues. They arc not bonded indebtedness. Rent not related to foe activities has lo be paid from 'Nithin the nppro- prfotions limit. Rent related to f ce activities can b~ paid from fees and 'charged as a cost of the product or service. Can't yoh thl~\_of _any__Qth_!:!:__r~_iculm~:;-~:om_Qlic~tion? Sure. How about the rate et-down effect? Under Proposition 4 if you don 1t. appropriate to your limit in any given year, you loose that much of yor limit for good. Your limit ratchets down. You can protect yourself by making sure that all tax revenues·, net utility revenues, or state urants are clearly spent, encumbered, or appropriated to contingency or reserve funds· each year. Don't let appropriations lapse because contracts are not ready for award. \.\'hat h~EQens if_g~ngre~-~ reduces or elimim1tes Revenue Sh~ring} . This question is potentially of great importance to tne state, counties, and cities. The answer "is that services funded from revenue sharing generally cannot be funded from new state or local taxes under Propo- sition 4. Federal subventions are not appropriations subject to limita- tion. They do not raise the ceiling on expenditures which may be made from state or local proceeds of taxes. Can fees for water, sewer, garbi!fJ:e collection, an~ o_ther sery1£~_J>e raised. u~ider Prop_Q~ition_1? Yes., nut net revenues in excess of the cost of service will be treated as tax proceeds. If they and other tax proceeds exceed the appropriations limit, the amount of excess has to be returned within the two follmYing fiscal years. The excess does not have to be returned in the form it \11ms earned. Utility 11 profits 11 can be put into the general fund to reduce property taxes, for example. On this point, however, you will want to watch SB 131 and SB 246, which limit the amount of 11 pro:fitu or constrain its use. The practical problem is that you will want to clearly relate rate increases to cost increases. For exumple, escalating connection charges should be tied to debt repayment or cost indices. Other rate increases should be documented by well detailed estimates of prospective revenue and expenditures. This all means more money to provide the same servic~s. Arc there other hidden costs in Proposition 4? Yes. For your own protection you shoufd--document you:fCOmj:illancc with Proposition 4 as part of each year's financial statement. This means that for every regulatory or service function, for which fees are charged, there 8hou1d be a statement of f ccs received versus costs incurred. Any excess of fees over costs should then be added to tax receipts, earnings on tnx receipw, and. state subventions. Finally you should compare these revenue totals to your appropriutions limit for the year. You cnn probnbly complete this reconciliation four to six months into the succeeding fiscal year, and adjust tux rates or fee schedules for ., .. 7 the second following year. If Proposition 4 passes, the Legislature may tell the State Controller to send you some regulations on this sub- ject. Is Proposition 4 practical administratively? In most respects, yes. 1 True, it is what the state Supreme Court has called "a legislative batter- ing ram used to tear through the exasperating tangle of traditional legislative procedure. 11 It is a crude instrument for delicate work. It also leaves much· room for interpretation and legal argument~. Look again at the number of vague terms highlighted on the exhibit. I ·As I've noted a couple of times, Proposition 4 is al"so overzealo.us.. In Hs thrust to curtaii expansion of government service, it adds consid- erably to the cost and burden of continuing services which are indis- putably necessary·. . . In addition there are two areas which virtually defy administration as the Proposition now stands. o First is the subvention issue. Do subventions mean all subsidies · from the state, or just operating subsidies? Does the term 11 sub- vention 11 refer to the services subvented or· to the dollars paid? If the reference is· to dollars paid, does the reference apply sep- arately to each program or only to the gross amount of subventions for programs in effect at the time referred to? · -. o Second is the interest-on-investments problem". Revenues from · the invest.'llent of tax revenues are defined as "proceeds of taxes; 11 they have to be accounted for in determining whether proceeds of taxes exceeded the appropriation 1L-,1it. But tax revenues have not generally been segregated for investment. Under Proposition 4 they must at least be· accounted for separately. When does a tax revenue cease to be a tax revenue? If it is transferred to a reserve fund or retirement fund, does it have to be tracked indefinitely, so that its investment earnings are stated separately from earnings on funds tr an sf erred as a cost of service? What is the starting point? Do we assume that some, all, or none of the existing fund balances cnme from tax revenues? Although I've already offered a lot of opinions, and a few guesses, I won't offer my guesses on these issues. All the evidence isn't in yet. As we saw with Proposition 13, the Supreme Court will look not only at the words of Proposition 4, if it passes and is challenged, but also at the official ballot arguments, campaign literuturc, and espe~ially at any follow-up legislation. I expect thu.t the Leuislature vvould try to clarify the meall"ings of "subvention" and "proceeds from investment, 11 nnd possibly address other points I've tried to cover. I won't specu- lntc on what the Legislature wm say, or whether its action would make matters better or worse. Before concluding I want to nddress one other qucs tion. 8 . . • .r. . • -...• .. -... I i i ! I I. i· I . . . . ' . . \,,,,,/ ~ -· Are ~~cci.~l districts cxcm2.~ from Pto2o~i!_!o~_i_RY rc~~~ll__Of S_cc~iQg~? No, w1fh few exceptions. Section 9 stutcs two exccp t1ons, ana tficy ar~ both illusory. One excepts from limitation any special district whose ad valorcm tax levy in 1977 /78 did not exceed 12. s· cents per $100. This means your tax levy before Proposition 13 for all purposes: debt., operations, and reserves. Few districts qualify, and even fewer if improvement district tax levies have to be considered. The second exception is for any special district totally funded by other than proceeds of taxes. Notice two points: (a) proceeds of taxes include state grants or other subvcn:tions and investment earnings on tax revenues. (b) No year is stated for determining whether a special district is exempt. It has to pass the test every year. ·If it accepts a clean water grant under the present program (i.e. not a new program or a higher level of service under Section 6), it is back in the appro- priations harness. If some of its investn1ent earnings are attributed to tax revenues, even those received years ago and used to build up reserves, it is back in harness. · · In summarizing I won't retrace my steps through this paper. I will just add two points--a petulant complaint, and a precautionary note. . . . I am ill-tempered enough to resent the deceitful arrangement of Propo- sition 4, even though I realize that the initiative game is often played that way. What you think you see when you look at the head and . tail is not what you get in the middle. And as you can see from this paper, the middle is pretty ~ard to decipher. I must also caution you not to believe what I have· said either. My opinions are sincere, but not incontestable. Were there not room for differences of opinion, there would be wholesale unemployment among lav\7yers. · Furthermore, Propos~tion 4 has not yet passed. If offers no bonanzas to anyone who votes for it. It will hurt those who need new or better services from government. It ignores the needs of future generations. It leaves little flexibility to respond to recession or disaster. It will continue to drive dedicated and qualified managers out of government service. · · You can't even tell from Proposition 4 how much government will cost. All you can be sure of it that more of the costs would be paid through service fees, and that the public would get more administration and less service for its money . 9 1· I .-. . . CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES Annual Work Conference August 22-25, 1979 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT I. THE LEGISLATURE The Legislature returned from its summer recess August 20th and will continue at a hectic pace until adjourning September 14th. Close to 3500 bills were introduced during the year. Under the two year session rule many bills which now appear 11 dead 11 can be carried over until next year. However, any bill not out of its House of origin by the end of January 1980 will automatically become 11 dead 11 • All things considered CASA has had a good year. I I . 11 BAIL-OUT 11 VERSUS LONG-TERM FUNDING Until mid-June it was uncertain whether the Legislature would enact another bail-out bill similar to SB 154 of last year or enact a long -term funding proposal for local government. Senator Rodda, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, introduced SB 186 as a second year bail-out bill in the event the Legislature was unable to agree on a long-term solut ion. AB 8 by Assemblyman Ler oy Greene was originally introduced as an ed ucation funding proposal, which was later amended in the Ways and Means Committee to become a long-term funding proposal for all local government, which was later simultaneously referred to three Senate Policy Committees for recom- mendations, which was then totally gutted in the Senate Finance Committee and made identical to SB 186, which then led to the establishment of a six member Conference Committee when the Assembly refused to concur with the Senate changes. I I I. CONFERENCE COMMITTEE The AB 8/SB 186 Conference Committee consisting of three Senators and three Assemblyman was the longest Conference Committee on record. It lasted approximately five weeks. Initially most Capitol observers anticipated that the Conference Committee would be unable to reach agreement wh ich would lead to the establishment of a second and more "heavyweight" Conference Committee. The Committee heard weeks of testimony from all affected parties, including fiscal projections by the so-called experts, and then began the arduous job of cutting the total cost of the proposal from $5. 1 billion to $4.85 billion which was a compromise between the Legislature and the Governor. The incorporation of the 11 deflator11 mechanism which reduces the States allo- cations to local government in the event of an economic downturn was a sig- nificant factor in obtaining the Governor's signature on AB 8. IV. PROVISIONS OF AB 8 AFFECTING CASA MEMBERS A major provision in AB 8 is the establishment of a permanent system for the allocation of revenues from the one percent property tax to local government entities. The systems provide for base shares of the total property tax revenues for local governments to take effect with the 1979-80 fiscal year. For special districts, the share is equal to their 1978-79 Executive Director's Report August 1979 -2- property tax allocations with certain additional amounts. These include an additional $200 million that will be shifted from schools to the county boards of supervisors, who will allocate the "bailout" to special districts. Cities and counties are also authorized to give general fund revenues to special districts. The bill provides that future growth in assessed valua- tions, as permitted under the provisions of Proposition 13, will be allocated on the basis of 11 situs11 among the jurisdictions that serve the tax rate area within which the growth occurs. Local agencies and schools will share the growth in proportion to their share of "base" revenues from the tax rate area. Each year's growth allocation will become part of each agency's base allocation in the following year. V. PRO-RATA SHARE OF THE PROPERTY TAX Last years bail-out bill SB 154, Rodda, contained a legislative intent provision that all special districts with the ability to generate revenues from user charges or fees should totally vacate the property tax which would then free up additional revenues for other segments of local government. In November your Executive Director presented testimony before· a Joint Committee Hearing of the Senate Committee on Local Government and Senate Committee on Revenue ·and Taxation urging that those agencies that relied on ad valorum taxes or a combination of taxes and user charges be able to maintain their pro-rata share of the 1% property tax levy. Because of the strong interest from our CASA members relying on the property tax this activity was continued with legislative staff and before the local govern- ment committees throughout this session. In addition we strongly opposed provisions in the Governor's proposals, SB 550 and SB 1050-Holmdahl, which would have allowed the County Board of Supervisors to distribute the special districts 1% pro-rata share of the property tax as they saw fit. VI. LIMITATIONS ON SPENDING During the session a number of proposed legislative constitutional amendments were introduced that would establish limitations on all govern- ment spending based on the consumer price index or similar indexes. At the May meeting I reported that all appeared to be dead except ACA 2, Boatwright, which was to become a "corrective amendment" to the Gann Initiative. One significant provision to ACA 2 was deletion of the provision in the Gann Initiative which excludes special districts which levy less that 12i cents from the limitations. Assemblyman Boatwright subsequently decided to drop his ACA 2 in view of the confusion which might result from the appearance of a competing measure on the ballot. VII. LOCAL AGENCIES FEES AND CHARGES Three bills, SB 131-Holmdahl, SB 246-Harks and AB 449-Perino all have as their intent prohibiting the use of fees or cha·rges for water or sewer service being used for general revenue purposes. The Legislature feels such use is a violation of the intent of Proposition 13 and wants fees or charges to "bear a reasonable relationship to the services provided". -- Executive Director 1 s Report August 1979 -3- SB 131 and AB 449 were held in the Assembly Local Government Committee and SB 246 after being defeated was then amended to only provide that prior to levying a new fee or service charge or increasing existing fees a local agency must hold one public hearing as part of a regularly scheduled meeting. VI I I. CASA SPONSORED LEGISLATION At the January meeting you instructed your Executive Director to seek legislation to provide for appointing certain alternate members to the Governing Board of a County Sanitation District. This legislation was principally requested by Orange County and Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. Assemblyman Henry Mello, the author of special legislation relating to the Monterey Regional County Sanitation District, was kind enough to allow us to be amended into his AB 51 which has been signed by the Governor. Since AB 51 contains an urg ency clause it is now law. IX. LAFCO's AB 170, Chappie, which would require LAFC0 1 s to approve special district representation when receiving a petition from a majority of the special dis- tricts within the county is currently on the Assembly Floor and wi l l probably become a two year bill. AB 287, Knox provides for special district re p r e - sentation on LAFC0 1 s for a 1 imited period of time for the purpose of con- ducting reorganization studies and plans which would be submitted to local agencies for action. In the event that no local agency affected by a recom - mendation for reorganization votes to approve such a resolution they would be ineligible to receive their share of the property tax levy. AB 287 has never been set for hearing. AB 1437, Knox, which would empower LAFC0 1 s to initiate proceedings to consolidate or dissolve special districts is on the Assembly Floor and will become a two year bill. CASA is opposed to AB 1437 . XI. SOLID WASTE SB 186, Dills, which would have the affect of requ1r1ng dump sites and transfer stations to be opened to all members of the public without restrictions or limitations is almost through both Houses of the Legislature despite the opposition of CASA and County Sanitation Oistricts of Los Angeles. XI I. BILLS AFFECTING CASA MEMBERS SB 302, Alquist, which would authorize the merger of the Cupertino Sanitary District and County Sanitation District No . 4 in Santa Clara County upon resolution by the County Board of Supervisors was defeated in the Senate Local Government Committee. AB 783, Chappie, which provides for a two year moratorium on the principal and interest payments for earlier construction for advanced wastewater facilities for all of our member agencies in the Lake Tahoe area is on the Senate Floor and should be on the Governor 1 s desk by weeks end. Executive Director's Report August 1979 Xll I. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING -4- The League of California Cities in conjunction with a number of employee organizations is sponsoring SB 858, Smith, which would establish a new employer-employee relations law for local government. CASA has taken an oppose position to the measure and is particularly concerned with the maintenance of membership (agency-shop) provisions. SB 858 failed passage in the Assembly Public Employment and Retirement Committee May 30th and reconsideration was refused. XIV. G.O. BONDS Senator Bill Craven, who addressed CASA members at the Rancho Bernardo Conference last August when he was still an Assemblyman, has recently introduced Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 26 which wou ld exemp t G.O. Bonds from the 1% property tax limitation opposed by Proposition 13, if approved by 2/3 of the votes cast by the voters of a local agenc y . SCA 26 has not yet been set for hearing and must pass both Houses of the Legislature by the first week in February in order to qualify for the the June 1980 ballot. It is supported by the California Manufacturers Association, California Tax Payers Association, Chamber of Commerce, as well as local government. XV. PA RK LA NDS AND RENEWABLE RESOURCES IN VESTMENT BOND ISSUE SB 547, Nejedly, as recently amended proposes a $495 mill ion Park Lands and Renewable Resources Investment Bond Issue for t he June 1980 ballot. If approved by the voters the revenues would be used for par k acquisition, salmon and steelhead enhancement, soil conservation, and water conservation. Included in the water conservation provisions is $100 million for water reclamation for grants to eligible local agencies on the basis of 87!% State/12!% Local matching basis. SB 547 is currently in the Senate Finance Committee and has some opposition. ft will probably be heard in Committ ee on August 27th. The SWRCB and the State Resources Agency have both as ked for CASA's su ppo rt of SB 547. MFD:d 8/14/79 . - ~genda Item No. 16 September 6, 1979 .• CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE C OUN TV, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714)962·2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS RE: IMPASSE PROCEDURE Included in the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Operations and Maintenance personnel unit is a provision that the "Districts agree to meet and confer no later than March, 1979 re current impasse procedures". On August 10th, the Orange County Employees Association, representing the bargaining unit, requested a meeting. On August 30th, the Districts' General Counsel met with representatives of the OCEA and attached is his Memorandum concerning their discussions. Included for the Directors' consideration is a proposed revision based on discussions between the· General Counsel and the representatives of OCEA. The General Counsel's Memorandum describes the effect of this proposed change. This matter will be discussed in detail during the executive session on personnel matters under Agenda Item No. 16 next Wednesday. Neither the General Counsel nor I have a recommendation . Attachments . atrAitM Fred A. Harper General Manager , CliJrn.ua 1: '.i?.SSE P ROVl ~ 1 o: (E:;ccrptec.J fr0rn Reso l utiG .. 75-1 2 7) _,__ ___ _ SF.CTI ON 9 . IM!'/\SSE (A ) - If, after a rc.:isona1>l e period of time , the Districts Gen era l Mana g er <ind the representatives of the re - cogni zcd employee o.rgunization have.:. cxh ~us t ed all po ss ibl e means of reaching agreement , either party ·may., hy written communication to the other , request med ia Lion. Within ten calendar days after receipt of ·the written r equest , the parties shall request the C a l ifornia State Conciliation Service to appoint a mediator.. If t h e mediator is unable to resolve the i mpa s se , .all unreso lved i~sues shall be submitted to th e Di stricts I3oards of Directors whic11 retains the right and responsibility of final decisio n s.regarding wa9es, fringe ·be nefit s , 11ours , and al l other terms and condition s of emplo~ne nt. 'PRO POSED CHANG E I N IMPASS E PROCEDURES PREPARED BY THE DISTRIC TS ' GENERAL · COUN SEL AMEN DI NG RESOL UTI ON NO. 75-12 7. Secti on 9 : Im p asse . A . If, during t he cou r se of negoti a t io ns between the Di stricts' r epr esenta - tive s a nd t he r ep r esent a ti ves of t he r ecogn i zed E mp loyee Or ganization, e i t he r part y d e t ermi nes t hat the negoti a t ions a r e li kel y t o result in an i mpasse as further defined he r e in, due i n part t o a di sagreement as t o the accuracy or v a l idity of factua l data s u bmitted by the representative of the other par ty, then a request for a fact finding m ay b e made i n writing to t he represen tative of t he othe r par ty. Wi t hin ten (10) days after receipt of the request for fact finding, each party shall submit the n3.me of a proposed i ndependent person to act as the Fact Finder, who shall be governed by the ru les set forth i n this procedure. In the event the par ties are unabl e to agree as to the person to be na med as Fact Finder, said person shall be appointe d by the California Sta te Conci l iation Se rvi ce, up o n r equest being duly m ade . The Fact F i nder, upon appoint ment, shall r equest the parties to submit those items which are the subj ect of disagreement pertain ing to the factual data being cons i dered by the respective parties i n t he course of the negotiations . It s h all be the fun ction of the Fact F i nder, so le l y to dete r mine the factual accuracy and validity of those ind i vi d u a l i tems rep r esented and urge d by each party. In arriving at this con clusion, the Fact Finder shall exercise i ndependent judgment and investigation to deter m i ne the accuracy or valid i ty to t he highest degree possible. Upon reach ing his conclusi on , h e shall repor t his fi nd in gs of fact a nd the underl ying basis therefor, di rectly to t he representatives o f each par ty wit h out making a recommendation as to the s ub st a nt i ve desirabi li ty of a n y issue. No repor ts shall be presented by the Fact Finder d irectl y to the p rin cipals to t he negoti ation, but solel y to the representatives. If, a fte r a r easonabl e peri od of t ime, t he Distric.ts' representative and the r epresentative of the recognized Employee Organi zation have exhausted all posssibl e m ean s of r eachin g an agreement , e ithe r part y may , by w r itten communication, r equest .• an im passe meeting . Within t e n (1 0 ) cal e n da r days a fte r recei pt o f the writte n re quest, the re sha ll be a n i mpasse meeting bet ween t he par t ie s t o: (1) Make one (1) additional e f fo rt to reach a n agreement ; (2) To identify a nd reduce to w riting the issue o r issues in disag r eement. If, aft e r the i mpasse meeting between t he represen tatives of each side, no ag reement h as been achieved, e i ther party may, request the Cali forn ia State Concilia- tion Se r vice to appoint a mediator. In conducti ng t he med iation,. the appointed mediator shall confer wi th representatives of both sides, and shall take into considera- ti on all factua l issues presented by the parties, a nd s hall a lso take into consideration t he findings of a Fact Finder which may have been presented to the respective sides. T he mediat or shall make no pub l ic recommendation s nor take any public position concern ing the issues. If t he med iator i s unable to resolve t he i mpasse, a ll unresol ved issues shall be submitted t o the Districts' Boards of Di rectors which retains the sole r ig ht and responsibility of f in a l decisions r egar di ng wages, frin ge benefit s, hou r s, and all othe r t e r ms a n d con ditions of employment. All cost s, if a n y , of fac t fin d i ng o r mediation procedures exer cised pursuant her eto, shall be bo rn e eq ually by the parties. TLW:pj 09/05 /79 C SD-Reso. .. -....... RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SEPTEMBER 12) 1979 -7:30 P.M. ( ( r-----------·-·· .... COUNT)'_ SANI'I:A.'.l'J~N-.D.IS.'l'RX.C.T.S __ OP ORA~~JLCOUNTJ CLAIMS PAID JULY 31, 1979 ----------------· .. ----·--·····-·-------·--------·----------------···-·-----··------·-·· ·-· WARRANT -~-· -----~-Q_. __ -------·-V_ENQ..O.R. ____ -·-· .. TOT.AL ________ ---·---------·-DESCRIPTION ;, I .::: :::·!~---·--·-~!~r~~!~ f~~~~-;fiter · -·----··-· -------· ___ $ _____ ;~:: ~~ -···---· ·-·· ----·~i~ :~~:er Fi 1 ters >1: 46619 American Compressor 17 4 ."43 Compressor ·Parts ~~:~ __ 4662.0 _____ American Kleaner_ Mfg~~-Co. , ____ Inc..!'._ ·--· 103. 62 __________ Truck Parts srn 46621 John A. Artukovich 321,064.25 Contract 3-20-4 • 1 :.:::: 46622 Associated of Los Angeles 472.39 Electrical Supplies ." l::j 46623 Bank of America ···--------------11.25 ----···-----· Bond Processing ':,-:J:::i··--· 46624 Banning Battery Co. 122. 32 Truck Batteries ,· 1 ........ 466 25 Bear irig Specialty Co. 6 O. 84 Bearing Supp 1i es -'_--i ___ 46626_ Bell Pipe & Supply Co. ·--______ ·-----------·--·--.. 26.44 Valves _., ~ 46627 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. 307.53 Engine Parts . · ...::. 46628 Boyle Engineering Corp. · 12,843.00 Survey 3-20-3, 3-20-4, : __ ;:t::._ _ _46629 ···-Burners & Controls, Inc. __ ·--------·-----------·--· _ 18.89 ..... Electrical Supplies · ::lO 46630 CS Company 1,102.25 Plug Valves ·· 1 46631 Harris Conveyor Company 423. 65 Conveyor Rental ='--------~6632_ _____ Campbell Heat.ing & Air ConditioninL----____ 940 •. 00 __ ··-----· Air Conditioner Repair 1 > 46633 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 7,408.61 Gasoline & Engine Oil :: F 46634 Colich & Sons, A Joint Venture 28,364. 74 Contract 3-13-1 ,: _____ .46635. _, ____ College Lumber. Co., Inc •..... ····-----·--9.92._. ·---·· Lumber t::J 46636 Compressor & Industrial-Engine Supply 725.04 Engine Repair .;........ 46637 Consolidated Electrical Dist. 16.78 Electrical Supplies --~-__ 46638 Consolidated Reproductions ___ ·-·-·------------· .. :. 320.04 ____ . ____ Blueprint Reproduction :::o 46639 Continental Chemical Co. 1,643.00 Chlorine · -46640. Cyclone Excelsweld Co. 1,882.40 Engine Repair ·~ ... :.. __ 46641 ____ .... Albert W. Davies,· Inc •. _.·-··--· __________________ _l._45,440.00______ Contract. S-21 .:.:(/) . 46642 Deco . . · 752.94 Electrical Supplies ·• 46643 De Guelle & Sons Glass Co. 21. 20 Glass· Plate · ·:, ____ 46644 . ______ Dix Metals, Inc. · · 91.58 Electrical Supplies 46645=""" Dunn Edwards Corp.· ------------------318. 00 ---·-·---Paint Supppes 4'6646 Eastman, Inc. · 142.02 .. Office Supplies ·-·---46647 ______ . VOID --------------·• oo __ _: _________ VOID 46648 · Fountain Valley Camera 345.47 · Film. Processing 46649 Fountain Valley Lock & Safe 40.81 Padlocks :·: _____ 46650 ·-.... Foust' s Scouting Service ...... ___ -·--· . 23. 32___ Sales Directory -~ 46651 France Compressor Products 406.75 Compressor Parts 46652 Fuel Injection Sales & Service 150.00 Fuel Injectors ." 1 ____ 46653__ City of Fullerton . . .. ___ ·-··------------·-· 51. 29__ Water Useage '. 10 46654 Gatlin Horne Sprinkler Supply 507.90 Irrigation Parts • 46655 General Telephone Co. 697.04 Telephone 46656 Gold Coast Awards, Inc. ··-------.. ---·---· 116.52 .. Award Plaque 46657 Gould, Inc.-Warrcn & Bailey 10.60 Pipe Supply 46658 H.B. Instrument Co. 55.64 Electrical Supplies -46659 llaul-Away Containers ·---··-____ ....... ··-···. 275. 00 Trash Disposal 46660 llookcr Chemicals & Plastics Co. 3,410.06 Chcmi_cals ,. 46661 Howard Supply Co. 131.44 Valves 46662 lluntinRton Supply 102 .15 Smal 1 Hardware .,, '-· -----· ---·-· -·· ·( :. and Engr. 3-13-1 ,._ ::: > I N ::: :J> ·c...1 rri ., -t..:j WAR RA.NT NO. 46663 46664 46665 46666 46667 46668 46669 46670 46671 46672 ,, -· ·:x:::--. -46673 .. · : ,. ' ., ·' -. -46674 --i ___ 46675 rn 466i6 3 46677 ~ ---· 46678 c..o 46679 > I I t=' -C/) --1-- ;:o -..... -~·--· (/.) ------ 46680 46681 46682· 46683 46684 46685 46656 46687 46688 46689 46690 46691 46692 46.693 46694 46695 46696 46697 46698 46699 46700 46701 46702 J6703 46704 -·--_4670·5 :: :P I. N 46706 46707 46708 -. ---~~ ~ -·-· . ·-_ ( COUNTY :SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID JULY 31, 1979 VENDOR Inland Empire Equipment Co. Jensen Instruments Co. Keen-Ku~ Abrasive Co. Kelco Sales & Engineering Co. King Bearing, ··Inc. Knox Industrial Supplies $ TOTAL 23.98 31-44 414·.oo 281.67 -. --·· ·-·· .. --~---··-· -·-·--·---919 .. 95. L&~ Uniform Supply Co. L. B.W.S., Inc. 88.74 • 3,958.16 ····-·--·-·· . --···-·--·----·--· ·-----· 553. 84 ·LFE Environmental Labs Lee & Ro Constilting Engineers Leonard's Carpet Service · K.P. Lindstrom & Associates McCoy Ford Midway Tool & Supply Co. Paul A. Mitchell Morgan Equipment Co. Motorola Communications, Inc. ~ational Cash Register National Safety Council National Sonics City of Newport Beach _Occidental College-Cashier . Orange Coast Hardwood'& Lumber Oxygen Service Pacific Telephone Parker Supply Co. Parts Unlimited Phillips Engine & Equipment Co. Pickwick Paper Products Pi tn.ey Bowes Precision Instrument Service Harold Primrose Ice R&E Industrial Fire Protection Randle & West Co. · Reynolds Aluminum Supp~y Co. Rvan-Uerco S~rgent-Welch Scientific Co. Shamrock Supply Shephard Machinery Co. South Orange Supply Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Gas Co. Southern Calif. Water Co. Southern Counties Oil Co. Sparklctts Drinking Water Standard Concrete Material 10.00 10,334.90 ... -··. -·--·-·· -· -· -----···· . 19 8. 97 -. co·.------·--·-·-···-·-· 2,257.37 20.22 23. 57· 25.62 75. 11 76.32 5 2 0 .·8 8 50.00 3,891.47 5.00 475.00 69.95 335.10 307.84 73.84 1,544.68 . -···--··-·--···· ----·--·· 1, 221. 36 435.68-- 73 .. 14 ··--· -·-·--·--·· -36. 56. 36.00 8,887.05 ··--··----.. -·-.. 8' 3 6 8. 0 0 . 278.45 50.38 61. 26 .... 439.01 1,450.03 -··-· -···-···-··-... 178.47 48,350.05 227.38 --·----·--·-·-----. ·-· 6. 53 11,358.96 ·---· --~-----··. -----( -···- 345.80 355.17" DESCRIPTION Truck Par~s Electrical Supplies Small Tools Hoses & Nozzles Electric Motor Parts Small Tools Uniform Service Welding Supplies Lab Analysis Hydraulic Reliability Engineering , Carpet Installation Ocean Waiver Services Truck Parts Small Tools Employee Mileage Truck Parts Radio Microphone~ Payroll Time-Cards Conference Registration Testing Equipment · Water Uscagc Ocean Research Lumber Speci3lty Gases Telephone Chemicals Truck Parts Engine Parts Janitorial~Supplies Postage Meter Truck Repair Industrial Waste Sampling Ice Contract PW-070 Electrical Work & Installation (J-6-10) Aluminum P-late Pipe Supply Lab Supplies Small Tools Truck Repair ·p 1 umb i ng Parts Power Natural Gas Water Useage Diesel Fuel Bottled Water Concrete Mix ( ( : . WARRANT :. __ .-... --.. NO .. ;,:_ ______ 4_6709 ,:~ 46710 •I! 46711 -----·--46712 :r 46713 46il4 >:> _Ci) __ 46715. ("Tl 46716 ~I. z 46717 : r· •T:. . ; ., !~· i" ~--46718_. .;:. 46719 -46720 ---1 --4 6 7 21 ~~ 46722 46723 _:~--46724 l.O 46725 I 46i26 ______ 46727 ~ '46728 I 46729 ... 46i30 t=j 46731 1---4 4 6 i 32 ~-.46i33.· ::.o ~---------· ··-- (/) l:' -------· ~ ~' I •:: . ::: .... l :i> _:: .. ~·- ,.,,. ~- COUNTY .SANITATION:DISTRICTS.~F ORANG~ COUNTY CLAIMS PAID JULY 31, 1979 ----·-· . .. VENOOR._ Starow Steel_ ____ _ Stone & Laughlin The Suppliers J. Wayne Sylvester _ Thor Temporary Services Tony's Lock & Safe Service Trans-America Delaval, Inc. Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc. United Parcel. Service United States Elevator Corp. United States Equipment Co., VBA Cryogenics VWR Scientific Valley Cities Supply Co. Valvate Associates Vanier Graphics Waukesha Engine Servicenter Kestinghouse Electric Corp. Wynhausen Softener Co. Xerox Co~putcr Services Xerox Corp. .. C&R Reconditioning Co. Fischer & Porter .. ~owry & Assoc:iates Inc. TOTAL ... ·-. --· .... --$ .. .. . 13 2 • 0 7 .. - 60.42 286."88. ·······-·····--··· -·--· 370.78 -- 325.32 62.50 .. ... -··---.......... --. . . . . 11 0 • 8 8 - 651. 73 126.46 .......... -... -....... --·-·· -··---·"-39.25 - 162.67 168.05 40.50 366.94 523.11 ·-··-·--···--·--··-------138. 68 512.19 982.05 -··· .... ---·---------. ---··-·· 161 • 1 2 121.47 4,693.15 . _,, _________ ····-.1, 665. 85 -··· 290.00 . 4,451. 78 ·~ --·-·• ----·-----·----. l, 016. 53 ---. TOTAL CLAIMS PAID JULY 31, 1979 $658,431.42 SUMMARY #2 OPER FUND # 2 ACO FUND __ _ #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND :t3 F/R FUND ___ _ ft5 OPER FUND #6 OPER FUND 117. OPnR FUND __ _ It 11 OPE R FUND 1111 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND ... #5&6 SUSPE~SE FUND # 6& 7 OPER FUND JT. OPER FUND.·-· __ CORF WORKING CAP. FUND $• 201.19 ·------·-----------$-1, 076. 53._. _____ ·-. t 140.41 ---···· --··------ $ 29,416.74 __ :$ 3.32, 85 5. 25 --------- $ 6,331.46 $ 24.49 ... ·-·-· --···-------------·--$. 1, 160. 78 .. __ $ 2,660.99 $ 368.04 -···-----·------$ 2,·225.45 ...... $145,440.00 $ 5.46 .. -.. . .. ---·----··-----_____ $ 70, 688. 29 -- $ 38,545.41 . $ 27,290.93' .· TOTAL CLAIMS PAID JULY 31, 1979 $658,431.42 DESCRIPTION Steel Stock ·Chemicals Lubricant Petty Cash Reimbursement Temporary Accounting Help Lock Repair Electrical Supplies Truck Parts Electrical Supplies Delivery Service Contract Contract PW-064A Demurragc Lab Supplies Plumbing Parts £lectrical Supplies Data Processing Supplies Engine Parts Electrical Supplies Water Softener Parts 'Data Processing Xerox Reproduction Air Conditioner Repair Electric~l Supplies Retention 2-16-l ( :::: tx:1 I J---a !::FUND NO WARP.ANT NO. 0"6748 ('46749 iC~~750 ~Hi51 c cie-752 C'H:753 CH:75~ C'ff.755 o.c;e:1s6 p c;> ~"f.757 rn 04f7~R :;:: '04£.75q ~ uA5760 ::>. ('Af.761 >--! C467~2 --1 t46763 rn 3 c-.6764 C457G5 ~ C4E-766 lO C4!-767 ('""") -I (/') ... . ... , t:x:1 . I 04lH.8 04£:769 C4t:.77!1 C4f771 C%772 !:46773 Ql;(.774 ClJ~775 (IA f. 71f: 0!!6777 C%778 CA6779 C'467SO 04f7Sl C"b7e2 CH783 t-%78/f ~~6785 C4q86 046787 C%788 ('Cf,=7P,'J 04(·790 C4"791 ~667?2 C"67c;3 91ri9 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAT( S/1H79 'PAGC REPORT NUMBE~ AP.~3 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . VENDOR A -W ENGINEERING co., INC. AIR PRO~UCTS & CHEMIC~LSt.INC. ALEXA~rE~ POWE~ TOCLS ALLIED COLLOIDS A~~~JCA~ HAR ASSN. ~MEPICAN CYANIMID COMPANY AME~ICi~ KLEANER MFG• co •• INC ANAHEIM SE~ER CONST~UCTION A!'JJ);T(~ rr.u7AN. ASt 1 :1RO(I~ -SIMON -HARTLEY tS~OCI~TED CO~CR[Tf p~oo •• INC ~SSOCI~Trc CF LOS ANGELES oA\K Ar'CPICtRD f!AR~ES t. Ot:LANEY JOHN r,. ~f.Ll CO. PrLL PIPE ~"SUPPLY co. ~Er~')(~ f-'ACtlINE me. ~ f. ~·;Z n::; P: f EP. ING, HJC. S I " r) t-'. f. C H H: ( ~LlCK i Df CKER ~FG. CO. ROCK & ASSOCIATES E: R I S TO L f' fir< K MED IC tl GR P • ' 1 NC euFEAU CF NATIC~AL AFFAIRS (; U !-' I'~ E f.N ~ I NE. ( R I r<.i C. C 0 • E-U!=~;t.R~ & C~NTP.OLS, INC. PUSI~l~S ~tCHI~E CONSULTANTS EUTIER E~GINEEPl~G, INC. CS CO'lPftNY CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC JO~~ CAPOLLO ENGl~tERS JO~U Ct.ROL:LO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN P•L• Cf.RSC~~ . CHEVRON u.s.A •• INC. CO~ST FIRE EQUIPMENT COA~T J~~URA~C[ AG[HCY COLICH ! $0NS, A JOINT Vf.NTURE COLLEGE LUMBER co., l~C. CON~OLlUATCO ELECTPICAL OIST. COi\SOL H~ATED FRl:IrliHlt.YS CONTINt~TAL CHE~ICfl ro CO~VER$t-MAREO-OAVIS-DtXON ~ICKf Y COOK CONTNACTlNG C00Pf.~ [~~RGY sEnVICES cnsTA ~tSA AUTO P~HTSt l~C. R. E. COULTER CKAM[ RENTAL ~R. CR!NE CLAlY.S PAID 08/14/79 AMOUNT $608.67 Sl89t720.00 $630.96 S3lt005.00 150.00 s5,534.oo S69.83 S425.00 tl66·31 S4tl30.00 Sl&S .. 36 $806.19 1306.28 $166.16 $70. 94 $214.60 ssioo.oo H 04 .:5 S4t24S.:3.0 $75.09 $258.00 $52.00 s1ao.20 s5,351.47 Sll8~9:3. . $36.(10 s13,s10.oo S·6A3.12 $282.40 S381,.412.33 $19,384.&4 $6.30 S9t3?.7.H $271. ?16 ss3,750.oo Ut9't4.00 S59.58 $267.·12 $34.36" $7t598.A8 Ut019.CJO $897.49 S'+t035.C:5 s:3oa.tts $702.00 $620.00 DES CR IPT 0l ON ENGINE REPAIR CONTRACT P2-23-2 TRUCK PARTS CHEMICALS PUBLICATION CHEMICALS TRUCK PARTS SEWER REPAIR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES MOBILE TESTING UNIT GRADE RINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRAVEL EXPENSES ENGINE REPAIR TRUCK PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES ENGINE REPAIR COMPRESSOR PARTS ENGI~E PARTS SMALL TOOLS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS SEWAGE TREATMENT MANUAL CONTRACT PW-074 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR P2-23-6 CONSTRUCTION PLUMBING PARTS TRUCK REPAIR . WAIVER APPbICATION & ENGR. P2~24, P2-2S ENGR. P2-23 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT GASOLINE FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSURANCE PREMIUM -EXCESS COVERAGE POLICIES CONTRACT 3-13-1 LUMBER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 FREIGHT CHLORINE SOIL INVESTIGATION ·Rf:PAJR MANllOLE BASES E~GINE REllAB. TRUCK PARTS CRANE RENTAL CRANE RENTAL J---a ::::: ( ( ( ~ I• ... • . t:r3 . I N · :fUl.fO ~:o IJARRANT C46794 C46795 046796 Oltf797 C4f.798 04~799 Clt6SOO C4H01 :-.::a C4~BC2 <:,';'"') 0'4f~03 rr1 04~SC4 ·-"7 Cl4£.8C5 .....:.- t::j C'1H·SC6 :.t> ~4f 807 _.... 045308 --l 0~!>$09 rn C46cl0 3 CH:Sll ~.::: 0'4~~12 c..o 046813 04~814 C46el5 :.t> c 4 i:iP.t6 I C4~817 r-C~E:~l8 t::1 C4!·8l~ ~ 01;~e20 (/) --l l'"ee21 :;o C4£,E22 ~ 045(:23 n Ot.:6824 -I ·(/) C46A25 c 4 ( !'.2 6 o4F-e27 C'H:P28. C46S2~ r.~t=ie3c 04E631 0'46832 ~46~33 u 4(: 3~q ClfGP.35 C4 6e.36 C'H·t.37 046('.38 C46839 ::: to I N ::: ~o. ( ( 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ~/1~/79 PAGE REPORT NU~BER AP43 2 ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR CH~ql(S P. CROWLEY CO. CROWN FENCE & SUPPLY co ••. INC. CULLIG~N DEIONIZED WAT(R SERV L~PRY CURTI TRUCK t EQUIPMENT ST~TE Of CALIFORNIA DAILY fILOT OELPHI· ~YSTEMS, INC. GECqGE DC MATTEO L.ERbY'S TOPSOIL OODGE CCNSTRUCTIO~ NEWS DOV~LETREE INN OF MONTEREY DU~~ EC~~ROS C~RP • EASTf'./I"~• ir~c. ENC!-<t.~:TE.R, INC. ESrO~DJOO ~ACHINEP.Y CO• FISC!-:Er. & POP.TER FllJCC\ ::l\:GHCEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOOTHILL FtED CO. fCU~T~l~ V~LLEY C~~ERA CITY OF FOU~JTAJN .VALLEY FOUNTAJN VALLEY LOCK ~ SAFE FPt~CE CO~PRESSOR PROCUCT FROST L~Glh~ERlNG SERVICES CO. ~W ~Al~TfNA~CE• I~C. GEt!f.~/.l f.LCCTRIC Sl!PPl:.Y GE~r~AL TELEPHONE co. J.e. GlLOEiH & ASSOCIATES. GOLDE~~fST FERTILtiER CO. DO~ CFECK & ASSOCl~TES Pi K $/.L(S HALL~A~K ~USINESS INTEPIORS H.\P.::tO~ P.~DIATOH HASTY LA#N & GAR~EN ~.C. HC~CRIE & CO., INC. Hf:rTZ C~I< LEASING DIVISION C~VIO A. HODGSON HOOK EH CHO-' ICfiLS S. PUST I CS CO HOUt?.~ SUPPLY CO. HUNOLEY CO~PANYt INC. CITY OF ~UNTINGTO~ PEACH l~LA~O E~PlRE [QUlPrENT CC. l~TE~~lTlONAL HARVtST(R CO. lNT[F~ATIONAL Ml~ICOMPUT[R lRVI~E RANCH ~ATER DISTRICT J t J SE~ER CONNECTIONS KEEN-KUT Ab~ASIVE CO. CLAIMS PAID 08fl4/79 AMOUNT $101.82 s1,112.so $5(;.00 s2s2.oo · s290.oo $37.76 $19,'tSl.OO $34 .. 74 $326.30 S612.25 SlR6.76 SH.10 $147.32 s3,ooo.oo St+('0.66 Slt651.02 $7,018.19 $283.55· $203.45 $30.BO S38e43 $3,090.46 $81!.87 $47.Sl $992.16 Slt324.85 s2,22a.a1 $25,545.00 S2A8.00 $26.2~ S3i)2el0 $209.77 Slt093.54 $167.90 $819.23 $4.50 SJ,619.'44 $868.37 $6'+3.85 $19.44 $l3e68 S72.61 S189.2lt $3.60 $960.00 $138.61 DESCRIPTION PUMP PARTS RETENTION PW-075 ~ESIN TANK EXCHANGE EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT ANNEXATION #34 PROCESSING FEE LEGAL ADVERTISING FOR PROPERTY LEASE COMPUTER INSTALLATION EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT GRAVEL LEGAL ADVERTISING 11-13-2 LODGING -EPA SOUk-'CE CONTROh CONFERENCE PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES lMGD JPL-ACTS. ENGINEERING CHAIN SAW FILM PROCESSING PLAN CHECK FEE PADLOCKS COMPRESSOR PARTS PUMP PARTS GASOLINE HOSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE EIS/EIR ENGINEERING SLUDGE HAULING CONTRACT 2-SR·l ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOLDING Tf.i,BLES .TRUCK REPA.IR MOWER & EDGER ELECTRIC }IOTOR AUTO LEASING EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT CHEMICALS VALVES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES· WATER USEAGE FUEL GAUGE • A I R F IL TE RS EDP EQUIPMENT 6 FREIGHT WATER USEAGE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 3A -SEWER LATERAL GRINDING WHEEL •I ·: :::: to I "\.N . . ~UNO NO \/Act RANT NO. .04681+0 C4Gettl ~c.6~/fZ C'f~843 0"!-844 C%e45 (lA~elf 6 046847 :t> C46B48 G> C46e49 rn C45C'50 ·-C" E-E51 ~ ~ C46e52 :;::. 046853 -o 4 !-e.5'+ --i nH~e.ss rn C46c56 3 C!4eB57 ~: 0"£.e:is LO C46fl59 C4!i860 046~61 :t> C46AG2 I f;4H6~ r-· (\4~~64 t=' C46Fi;,5 -C46E.65 C/) --i (14(:867 :.:o .C4f.e68 -046€69 c.-> 0%870 --i C/) 04H71 CC6872 !!4f.873 C~6874 046$75 04(:~76 C't6877 046578 f:t+6579 ('%('80 OH~Rl 04~E32 046883 04Ge84 046885 ~ to I . \.N :::: ~ 91q9 -JT DIST YORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/1~/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBER A?q3. 3 ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/14/79 V.ENOOR AMOUNT KELCO SALES &[ENGINEERING CO. GALE v. KELLY Kl~G ?.CA~ING, INC. K~OX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES L·=·w.s., INC. LA~CE SPEEDOMETER LA~RY'S PLDG. r.ATERlftLSt INC• LEE & ~O CONSULTING f.NGR· LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICC SUPPLY LIGHTI~G DtSTRI~UTORSt INC• K.P. LINDSTROM & ASSOCIATES ~ASi(R SLUEFRI~T ! SUPPLY rc~AHA~ DESK OF COSTA MESA MINI-CO~PUTER SYSTEMS, INC. MONROE CALCULATOR co. '00~( PUSINESS FOR~S, INC. .,OOP.E & TAOER E.~. ~CRITZ FOU~DRY NATlCNAL LUMOER SUPPLY NATKn & COMPANY NELSO~-OU~Nt I~C· NOTTI~GHAM PACIFIC CO. NOYES DATA CORP ORANGE COUNTY BOILER ~ INDUSTRIAL REPAIR, INC. CRA~G~ COUHTY FARM SUPPLY CO. CRA~Gr COU~TY RUeOER co. OXYGEN SERVICE rou~~ TY oF OR ANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT O~ ORANdE COUNTY GRCGG PAMSON PA~TS u;-.,LJMITED r..c. PATTEN CO~P. PEiRSO~S LA~NMOWER CENTER TO~ F"fS!CH PETTrnONE CORP. PICK~ICK PAPER PRODUCTS TO~ PONTON• INC. PORTEn ~OILER SERVICE. INC. POST~AnER HAP.OLD PRIMROSE ICE PEP INr.(X RU~ EU:CTP.ONICS THE F.E. C.!$TER £H~ m; 1 ~ M • RE I 0 REPUl'LIC ENGINES ?!CARD'S HYDRAULICS $202.35 S4e50 Sl,402.95 $107.18 $2R9e01 $106.40 s101.12 $1lt173.56 $477.82 $35.RO $2,47Lf .07 S240.0l $1,928.l't ss1e,. 12 $4.3.85 $483.19 . $908-60 $890.22 $332.50 S2,883.41 $39.71 sse.30 $H2.75 $47.13 $233.82 Slf8.97 u21.s2. $48.13 u,1e,1.33 $13.35 S713.57 $78.57 $324.21 $7.50 $52. l't $610.92 s121 •• H $43.87 u,ooo.~o $3!u 00 $185.50 st+,483.oo u,211.1s SH.34 ( $163.64 $308.93 DESCRIPTION TRUCK PARTS EMPLOYEE MILEAGi REIMBURSEMENT BEARING SUPPLIES SMALL HARDWARE WELDING SUPPLIES TRUCK REPAIR GRAVEL ENGR. HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY SAFETY SUP?tIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OCEAN WAIVER BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES CHAIRS & BOOKCASE SALES TAX LIABILITY CALCULATOR RIBBONS PURCHASE REQUISITIONS TESTING PW-069 . MANHOLE RI ~G & COVER S?-tJ\I.L HARDWARE DIESEL FUEL TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT RENTAL . INDUSTRIAL WASTE MANUALS ENGINE PARTS CHEMICALS VI~YL TUBI:-!G . SPECIALTY GASES LAB ANALYSIS REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT TRUCK PARTS PRESSURE GAUGES MO~ER BLADES & WEED EATER EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT SALES TAX LIABILITY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ENGINE PARTS POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE APARTMENT HOUSE DIRECTORY ·MOBILE 2-WAY RADIOS LEGAL ADVERTISING PW-076, 11-13-1 ASD J-13-2R EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT AND TRAVEL EXP. TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS ( : :: b:' I . ..J:;:.- :fUNO NO \IARRANT NO• 046586 o '+ e,~1n Qtq;eAS 04r,eec; t"if.C\90 Ct+E-891 0"~892 O"r.E11)3 01.i~fic;t; ~ C4fA95 r:n t'4H96 .-=" C'f(...f.97 S C40S7B ~. C4Ge'?9 ~ .046900 -I C,ll;f,501 rn 0 t+ E-C.:C 2 :3: C4f.C?C3 :i:t:: C4e9Q4 ~ O'-e9t'S 04!:?0& C4f.9C7 :x:=-0'46C:OR I C46l?t'9 I C46f.:ll0 0 C 4 E-~ll ........ P'+~'J12 en 04to913 --1 :.-0 04!:914 ........ C4&~15 Cl C'+6916 -I C46~17 (/) IJ't6'?18 0~5911? !)46920 04!:921 046922 C46923. C'4~924 046525 ('l;f.926 ('4fCJ2i Ct; 692 8 04E.929 Olt6')30 046931 t'3 I .J::" :.: ( ( (. 9159 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE S/14/79 .PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP~3 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OS/1~/79 . VENDOR SANTA ANA DODGE SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS. SA~TA A~A RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION AGENCY SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS CITY OF SEAL OEACH St:ARSt ROEOUCK & co •.. SfE OFTICS SH.ALLE r. & LOHR' I NC• SM/.~~ROCK SUPPLY SHEPH~RO M~CHINERY CO• ~HERYlN ~lLLIAMS CC. SLADQ(N ENGINEERING H.C. S~ITH CONSTRUCTION CO• SOUTH ORANGE SUPPLY ·soUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO• SO. CAL. GAS. CO. SOUTH(SN COUNTIES OIL CO. STARO~· STEEL STERLING POWER SYSTEMSt INC. THE SUFPLifRS J. WAYNE SYLVESTER T AYLOP.-OUNN 3q STAKE ~ BUILOlNG SUPPLl[S F.M. niOMA$ AIR COr·mITIONING c.o. THOMPSON PfTRClLEUM CO• THOR H.Mf'ORAP.Y SERVICES PH!L TO~P.C:S iRAVEL euFFS TRIAD rECHANICALt INC. T~UCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. TUlNING LAEORATORirs UNION OIL CO. PF C~LJF. UNITED P~RCEL SERVItE UNITEO STATES EOUIP~ENT co., t us DEPT OF COMMERCE N.T.1.s. VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VAF.EC, INC• ~. K. SIGNS JOH~i R • ~A PLES CARL W~RREN & CO. WATER rOLLUlION CCNTROL FEDERATION ~AUKESHA E~GINE SERVICtNTER ~ESTER~ CITIES MAGAZI~E ~ESTERN WHOLESALE CO. ~ESTI~CHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP JU:ES \.IYRE.NGA AMOUNT SUS.68 . $363.62 si.100.00 :s30.02 Sl6.72 $405.50 $(,(,. 0 0 S'h904.00 $161.52 $386.38 $435.21 s2as.oo $995•691.60 . $2.59. 33 $4'h 012 .13 $1•297.70 .. $751.54 S2t29&.AS sn.cn sun .1;9 u 72.'+6 $318.57 s123.1s $1,595.00 $155. 82. ~·299.06 $52.50 :tsn.oo $160,735.66 Sl t.14 7 ·'f 5 . $48.00 $25.79 $44.31 $8,697.22 . $14.00 $633.85 s1,001.10 $159 .• 0 0 $22'1.80 $450.00 s10.oo Slt25'f.40 $144.00 S120.G2 $9.A3 Sl61.99 DES CR IPT~ ON TRUCK PARTS SUBMERSIBLE PUMP MEMBERSHIP LAB SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE AIR tONDITIONER SAFETY GLASSES ENGR. BIG CANYON SYSTEM SMALL HARDWARE TRUCK PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES TESTING 3-20-4 CONTRACT P2-23-6 PLUMBING PARTS POWER NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL STEEL STOCK ENGINE PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES PETTY CASH TRUCK PARTS LUMBER AIR CONDITIONER REPAIR KEROSENc TEMPORARY ACCOUSTING HELP EMPLOYEE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT AIR FARE CONTRACT Pl-17 AND PW-061 TRUCK PARTS TESTING P2-23 GASOLINE ; DELIVERY SERVICE RETENTION PW-064-A PUBLICATION PLUMBING PARTS PRESSURE VALVES SIGNS ODOR CONSULTING SELF-INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE REGISTRATION .ENGINE PARTS CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRAVEL EXPENSES :: b:1 I \.11 · . Ft.C,:o NO YARR ANT ~JO• (146932 046933 046934 :t> G> . rri ::z t::1 J:> t--t --t rri 3 ::;:t:: lD :J:> r-r- t::::1 .,.__. .en ~ :;o .,.__. Cl ~ en :: to I \J1 :: 9199 -JT DIST YORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ~/14/79°PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR XEROX CORP. GEOQGE YA~OLEY ASSOCIATES. ZELLER'S CYCLE CLAIMS PAID 08/14/79 AMOUNT $136.63 $100.07 S446.70 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/14/79 $2,088,840.59 SUMMARY #1 OPER FUND #2 OPER FUND' 1#2 ACO FUND #3 OPER FUND It 3 ACO FU~D #3 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND 1#5 ACO FUND 117 OPER FUND •. ltl 1 OPER FUND # 11 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT. OPER FU~D CORF WORKING CAP. FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 14, 1979 ~----------------------~--------- $ 130.58 472.95 288.00 4,318.08 2,27i.13 25.02 1,577.77 s,_923.90 4,051.09 1,961.61 l, 0 2 9 .'81. 498.48 3,301.90 189~681.30 1,840,547.22 .32,.755.75 $ 2,08S,840.59 OESCRI;)noN XEROX REPRODUCTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BICYCLE ( ( 5 :::: C1 I J-a f5r.;o ~o WA!lRANT NO. 046943 C'+E-~'+4 C469'45 (it+69lt6 04f>C/47 C4c948 046C?49 r-46550 C4f.0 51 . :t:a 046tJ~2 ~ Ci4E:Cf53 :z G4~9~lf t=' C4f:;55 J:::. 04!;~% i--c Cl;~C:·57 --i C'9c~5S rT1 C4E959 3 (46c.;f.~ ==t:t: CH:':?C·! t..O C4e%2 04f.5G3 C't6%4 )> 04(;<;&5 I 04f>Ci6fa I 0'-fCJ(. 7 t:j (4f'?&8 -C46%? (/) C46S70 --i AJ .OH971 ......... 045~72 Cl c40c;,73 --i Cl) 0 4(. c;74 04(;ti75 (j';f.1;7fi C4f977 c4e;q1s 04€-1?79 0%980 O'H.9f.l. u'-65f.2 046983 04f.98lf 04t:9e5 04£:586 C%9E.7 C46%8 (_ ( 9199 -JT DIST ~ORKINC C~PITAL P~OCESSING DATE 8/23/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 CCU~TY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU~TY CLAIMS PAID 08/28/79 VENDOR ACTION INSTkU~fTS CO., INC. ~DVANClO (LECTRO~ICS /.MER. so:H TY FOf\ TESTING AME~ICAN CYANIMIO CC~fANY AM(~IC~N LOCK S SUPPLY, INC. ASSOCIATED OF LCS A~GELES AU~HOR!ZED SUPPLY CORP 5A~NI~~ e~TTERY CO. JOtaN G. f:ELL CO. BENZ E~GI~EERING, INC. CE~KLfY CO~TROLS, INC. PIERLY & ASSOCIATES, INC. BJ?D .MACHIN( POCK & tSSOCIAT~S fiO~LlVtRD CASI~f T SHOP \ii.C. f\f.OOKC R. P. GURK( CO~PORATION c ~ R HECONOITIONING co~ C $ C 0 ~~ PA l'l Y CALlfQqNIA E~VIRONVENTAL CONTROLS, INC. CAR~AN TOOL S A2RASIVES CHAQL(S ~. CARTtn CO. Ct$( PGWER t EGUIPMENT CHEV~O~ U.$.A., I~C. COLLCGE LUMe£R co., INC. CO~SCLIOAlED [LtCl~ICAL CIST. CO~ll~lNTAL C~f~ICAL C~ conPER ENERGY S~RVICES D~ILY PILCT c::co rEPAPTHENT OF GENERAL SERVICES DU~N ED~APOS CORP. ELECTRIC MACHINERY MFG. CO. E~VlROTECh CORP. FISCH[~ ~ PO~T~R CO. FLAT ~ VERTICAL CC~CR[TE CO. FORE~OST THPEADED PRODUCTS CLIFFORD A. FCRKERT THE FC~oCRO CO~PANY. F~EOEPJCK FU~P i ENGINEERING CITY OF fULLlRTO~ GE~ERAL T~LEFHO~E CO. GOLOE~~EST FE~Tlll2CR CO. CL,UO S. GORfON CO. H~K SALES HACH CHEMICAL CO. AMOUNT SS.94 $'+8.96 $41.15 $8,392.57 $474.78 S2t16'3.07 $90.15 S26S .96 $116.23 $273.36 $210.79 $900.!lO $51.96 $1'+6·26 $955.00 $37.14 ss,:s51.47 SlfA0.00 $199.43 $106.07 S4le98 $399.41 $224.41 sti,596.59 $1'16.90 $479 .q 7 $11,767.34 $16?.06 S22.'t6 $371.38 $53.00 $126.82 $259.45 S35f\.70 Sl'f4eo6 $%0.00 $459.f\9 $4,647.58 $40.35 Sltl73.50 $124.73 $3,101.43 $13,845.00 tl28.64 $152.84 $13.10 DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUBLICATION CHEMICALS PADLOCKS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK BATTERIES TRUCK PARTS COMPRESSOR PARTS CONTROLS SELF-INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR FREIGHT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES OFFICE COUNTER EMPLOY EE MILEAGE CONTRACT P\'l-074 BLOWER IMPELLER REPAIR VALVES ENGINE PARTS THREAD CUTTING OIL TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS GASOLINE LUMBER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE ENGINE PARTS LEGAL ADVERTISING 11-13-2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SUBS CR I PTI ON PAINT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SWEEPER ARM ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CORE DRILLING SMALL HARDWARE ENGINEERING P2-23-6 & SURVEY S-21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS WATER USEAGE TELEPHONE SLUDGE HAULING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ( :::: ('"'") I N .... ... FUND NO WARRANT f\:O. 046989 C469'?0 OHt?n £146°92 r46993 C4~9 1H 04€-~95 046996 :J:>04E-997 -G')Cl 4 6 l?C: 8 rno4c,999 @047CCO ::t:>O't 70Ql c1o.1:02 ~C4°U-03 rn047no" 3047005 (II+ 7G(:6 ~047CC7 047'i08 I C47CC9 :t>Ct+7010 r-Ci470ll IC47012 t::j047Cl3 _..047(:!'4 C/.)047C15 ---1047016 ~047017 ("""')047Cl8 ---IC:470l9 C/.)c.1;1r.20 (:471121 C47r.22 C47C23 04 7G~ 4 047025 Clf 70?6 0'+7027 Ct+7C2B C47C29 047G30 047G31 047032 047033 :::: Olf7034 Cl I N :::: 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/79 PAGE R~PORT NUMSER AP~3 ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VE NOOR HARDY & HARPER, INC. HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HAUL-A~AY CC~TAINERS HINES ~HOLESALE NURSERIES HCLLY~OOD TIRC OF ORANGE HOOKER CHEMICALS & PLASTICS CO .. HO~ARO surPLY co. CITY OF HUNTINGTCN BEACH HUNTINGTO~ SUPrLx rnGR AM PAPEF< I~TERNATIONAL MINICOMPUTER CITY OF IRVINE OP.YOt-JACKSO~ PUMP DIVISION hO& JOHNSO~ G.~.c. KELLY PIPE CO. KING HEARING, INC• KIRST PUMP & MACHI~E WORKS L.B. 'ti. s., JNC. LANCE SPEEDOMETER H. c. LtWSON CO. LIGHTING DISTRI&UTORS, INC• ~CC•LLA BROS. PU~P & DRILLING ~CKESSON CHEMICAL CO. MCKINLEY EGUJPMfNT COR~ MCKAST(R-CARR SUPPLY CO. MIYAKC-L[ECE-WOOD ASSOCIATES M\JeJL OIL CGRP. ~CORE UUSINESS FOPHS, INC• NATIONAL CAR RENTAL NE~ARK ELECTRONICS NOLAND PAPE~ CO. O~ANCf. COUNTY EUUJPMENT CO. C 0 U ~ TY S MH T/l Tl C N DISTRICTS 0 P p, ~ .• A, ORAr·:GE COUNTY PACIFIC TELEPHONE M.c. PATTEN CORP• P E Nr~ w A LT C 0 r P • PrnK I N-E U'.ER PICK~ICK PAPER ~ROOUCTS PvSTMASTER HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE REYNOLD ALU~lNUK SUPPLY CO. ROSSUOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. SAFFELL & MC ADAr, INC. SANTA ANA EL[ClRIC MOTORS SCIE~TIFIC PROrUCTS CLAIMS PAID 08/28/79 2 · FUND NO \:ARRANT NO. OHC35 047036 C47C37 047038 04703? C4704Q 0"7041 047042 :?:> 0'+7043 G'> 04iC4'4 rri 047C45 Z 047G46 ~ C47C47 r.4JC'4S t-4 047C49 rri ('47(150 3 Qt+7C51 CCJ7C52 ~ 04 iC53 <.O C47054 I 047C~5 047056 :t> C47c.57 I r-(·470~8 c 'I 70~·9 t::::I 0 4 7C 6 0 u; Ct. 7Cel --1 C'!7P.&2 ;:a 0'17f.63 ~ C47C6l! --1 0470&5 C/.) 047Ct(;6 :: ("""') I \.N :: 047067 047068 ( { 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/79 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR SHAMROCK SUPPLY SHER~IN ~ILLIAMS SIMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY SLAODE~ ENGINEERING SMITH-EMERY CO. SOUTH ORANGf. SUPPLY SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. SO. CAL. GAS Co. SO. CALIF. TESTINC LAB SO. CALIF. WATER·tC. SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. SOUTH~EST SAFETY & SUPPLYtINC. SPARKLETTS DRINKING ~ATER SPRAYING SYSTE~S CO. SUROIJ STEEL HIE SUPPLIERS TAYLOR-DUNN F.M. THOMAS AIP CONDITIONING THOMPSON LACOUER CO. THOR TEMPOR~RY SERVICES TRLNS-AHERICA DELAVALt I~C. TRl.VEL SUFFS H. O. rnEP.ICE TREXLf~ COMrRESSORt INC. TKUCk & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. U.S. ELECTRICAL MOTORS U~ITEO PARCEL SERVICE UTILITIES SUPPLY CO. us DEPT OF COMMERCE N.r.r.s. VUR SCIE~TIFIC WAUkESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER THOMAS L. ~OOORUFF XEROX COMPUTER XEROX CORP. CLAIMS PAID 08/28/79 AMOUNT $97.21 $418.31 $63.39 s200.oo $105.00 $149.36 S41t309.02 s1,211.0G $2lf3·11 $7.$5 $5.875.05 $l04.9lf $370.32 $417·62 $8%.44 $570.74 Slt215.63 s1,s9s.oo $101·76 $581.26 S.307.26 $1,106.00 $309.99 $209.99 $3 1f4el7 $22.86 · ·s33.7lf Sl~0.62 :r.21.00 $213.28 $160 .89 Slt,882.59 Slf tlSlf.37 u,s10.20 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/28/79 S17lt043.95 ---------------------------------- DESCRIPTION SMALL TOOLS PAINT SUPPLIES SAFETY GLASSES TESTING 3-20-4 TESTING CONTRACT S-21 PLUMBING PARTS PO\~ER NATURAL GAS TESTING P2-23-6 WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL SAFETY SUPPLIES BOTTLED WATER SMALL HARDWARE STEEL STOCK SMALL HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR CONDITIONER PAINT SUPPLIES TEMPORARY ACCOUNTING HELP ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMPRESSOR PARTS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS DELIVERY SMALL TOOLS PUBLICATIONS LAB SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS LEGAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING XEROX REPRODUCTION ( 3 . . ::: n I -t::' ::: ( PROCESSING DATE 8/23/79 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER-AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY #2 OPER FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND #3 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 SUSPENSE FUND #6&7 OPER FUND ft7 OPER FUND · 1#7 F/R FUND # 11. OPER FUND # 11 ACO FUND JT. OPER FUND CORF WORKING CAP. FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 28, 1979 CLAIMS PAID 08/28/79 AMOUNT $ 2,562.28 6,763.69 200.00 18.76 596.16 639.49 1,681.96 5.46 1,081.92 812.50 574.56 22.46 88,717.46 21,905.80 45,461.45 $171,043.95 ( (' RESOLUTION NO. 79-119 AWARDING JOB NO. J-13-2R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS.OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, on March 8, 1978, Resolution No. 78-36, approving plans and specifi- cations for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2 and authorizing advertising for bids., was adopted by the Boards of Directors; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution No. 78-36, as amended hr Resolution No. 78-80 on May 10, 1978, and Addendum No. 1, bids were received and publicly opened on June 13, 1978; and, WHEREAS, the low bidder's proposal for said Job No. J-13-2 exceeded the engineer's estimate by approximately 47%, the Boards of Directors, by Resolution No. 78-110, therefore, rejected all bids for said work on June 14, 1978; and, WHEREAS, on June 13, 1979, Resolution No. 79-68 approving plans and specifi- ~ cations for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for said job was adopted by the Boards of Directors; and, WHEREAS, when no bids were received on August 2; 1979, the date established for receipt of bids for said Job No. J-13-2R, the Boards of Directors, on August B, 1979, authorized the staff to negotiate a contract for said job for further consideration by the Boards at the regular September, 1979, meeting, NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of a negotiated contract be made to Coy Atkins for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, and the bid tabulation of proposals for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" . r· "D-2" Section 2. That the negotiated contract for said Job No. J-13-2R, be awarded to Coy Atkins in the amount of $199,000.00 in accordance with their negotiated ~ proposal and the terms and conditions of the specifications therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #lOCA) -ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" . \.,,I "E" D I D ~ A D U L A T I 0 N S H E E T SPECIFICATION NO. J-13-2R Sept. S, 1979 2:00 P.M. Warehouse Office Expansion PROJECT DESCRIPTION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 175,000.00 REMARKS · BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------- --~..;.__~~--:-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BIDDER TOTAL BID 1 .. · Coy Atkins Fountain Valley, CA $19. 9 I 0 0 0 • 0 0 2. R.J.W. Construction Orange, CA 92667 $209,256.00 3. Rainey Construction Co. La Habra, CA $258,000.00 4. .R. Bruce Field, Builder-Contractor Anaheim, CA· .$259, 142. 00 5. I have reviewed the proposals received for the above project and there.fore recommend award to Coy Atkins of Fountain Valley, CA, in the bid amount of $199,000 as the lowest and best bid. I concur to award / .1 . ' .... / ,. /; .-.. • .. ... , . .• • , '.. t. ' •• Thomas M. Dawes Senior Engineer AGENDA ITEM #10(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "E" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNI~ 92708 CHANGE. ORDER GRAMT NO. ____ NA-------------------\~·~~J 1 ·c. 0. NO·------------ DATE ~------------~----~-------- August 28, 1979 CONTRACTOR: ___ P_._R __ ._n_u_RKE ___ c_o_RP __ o_RA_T_I_o_N ________ ~- Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports JOB: ___________ R_e_c~l_am_a_t_·i_o_n __ P_l_a_n_t_N_o_._1~,.__J_o_b __ No~·-P_W_-_0_6_6_-_1 ________ ~~----~---------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 00.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contrnct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addit~ons to or deductions from the contract price are,hereby appr~ved. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time caused by delays in delivery of ~nife gate Rovalves ~s specified. . · .. : . SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension thsi Change Order ·Total Time Extension Revised Contract· Time Revised Completion Date TOTAL TIME,· EXTENSION May 24, 1979 75 Calendar Days August 6, ·1979 11 Calendar D~ys .11 Calendar Days 86 Calendar Days August 17, 1979 Original° Contr~ct Price $ Prev. Auth • Charges $ . . This Change (ADD) (Intl>t.l~ $ Amended Contract Price $ Board authorization date: September 12, 1979 Approved: 11 Calendar Days 11 Calendar Days 25,965.00 o.oo 0.00 25,965.00 P. R. BURKE CORPORATION couinY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California •By ________________________________ _ By----------------~------------ Contractor Chlcf Engineer II F" . AGENDA ITEM #lO{c) -·ALL DISTRICTS "F" "G" RESOLUTION NO. 79-120 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-066-1 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORTS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066-1, AS COMPLETE, AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. f, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, P. R. Burke Corporation, has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORTS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066-1, on August 17, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Job No. PW-066-1 is hereby accepted as complete in accordance with th~ terms of the contract therefor dated May 24, 1979; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with P. R. Burke Corporation setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District ~o. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #lO(o) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" .... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ... CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_A ________________ __ C. 0. NO. 1 --------------~--~-------. . . CONTRACTOR: R & E INDUSTRIJ\L FIRE PROTECTION,_ INC-oATE Au gtt'!:> t 28, 1979 ----------~--~----~~------- Jna: Fire Sprfnkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $. 0. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby·~pproved. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME •. The Contracto~ is hereby granted an extension of contract time caused by ~elays in securing supplies and City approval of traffic c9ntrol and backflow prevention device 52 Calendar Days TOTAL TIME·EXTE~SION 52 Calendar Days • SOMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Con~~act Time Original Completion Date ~ime.Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date April 26, 1979 60 ~alendar Days June 24, 1.979 52 Calendar Days 52 Calend~r Days 112 Calendar Days August 15, 1979 Original Contract Price $ 19, 749. 00 .. Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 .. This Change (ADO) ~tIDtr<Pr') $ ___ o_.o_o ____ _ Amended Contract.Price $ 19,749.00 Board authorization date: September 12, 1979 R & E INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC. ·By ______________________ ~------ Contractor Approved: cournv SAH I TAT I ON DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California ·By--------------------~--:-------- Chief Engineer "H" AGENDA ITEM flO(E)-ALL DISTRICTS "H" .. RESOLUTION NO, 79-l~J ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-070 AS co:.iPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070, AS COMPLETE, AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Distrjcts Nos. l, 2, 3, S, 6, ·7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, R & H Industrial Fire Protection, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070, on August 15, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended \_,I acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;-and, Section 3. That Job No. PW-070 is hereby accepted as complete in accordance with•the terms of the contract therefor dated April 26, 1979; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. setting forth the term? and conditions for acceptance of Fire · Sprinkler System for Existing Warehpust at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, is hereby approved; and, · Section 6, That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED A.~D ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. II I II AGENDA ITEM #10(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANG.E ORDER GRANT NO.· NA -------------------------c .O •· NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: P. R. BURKE CORPORATION DATE August 23, 1979 Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary JOB: Clarifiers, Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072 .Amount of this Change Order (ADD) · (DEDUCT) $ 633.73 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are_ hereby aP.proved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated 8-1-79, and Districts letter dated 8-9-79 •. ADD: 1. Extra stainless steel angle for work in Secondary Basin No. 9. This material was to have been supplied by the Districts. Due to problems encountered by the Districts with respect to supplying this material, the Contractor was directed to supply the material to minimize down time for the Activated Sludge Plant. TOTAL ADD No time extension for the above i~em. $633.73 $633.73 Original Contract Price $ 26.940.00 Prev. Au th. Changes $· 0. 0 0 This Change (ADD) ~Hin{) $ 633. 73 Amended Contract Price $ 27,573.73 Board authorization date: September 12, 1979 Approved: P. R. BUPJ<E CORPORATION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California ·By __________________ ~------~--- By ______________________________ __ Contractor Chief Engineer II J" AGENDA ITEM #10(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II J" \.,.) "K" RESOLUTION NO. 79-122 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-072 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING LAUNDERS AT SECONDARY CLARI- FIERS, PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-072, AS COMPLETE, AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, P. R. Burke Corporation, has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING LAUNDERS AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS, PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-072, on August 31, 1979; -. Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has reconunended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Job No. PW-072 is hereby accepted as complete in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated June 28, 1979; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with P. R. Burke Corporation setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers, Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-072, is hereby, approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County.Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #10(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "K" .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_A ________________ _ ~ C.O. N0. _____ 1 ______________ ~--- CONTRACTOR : P. R. BURKE CORPORATION DATE August 28, 1979 .. -------------~----~--~-----Installation of Primary Clarifier No.· 1 Sludge Withdrawal JOB: __________ P_i_p_e_a_t __ R_e_c_l_am_a_t_i_·o_n __ P_l_a_n_t_N_o_. __ 1_,~Jo_b __ N_o_. __ P_W_-0_7_4 __________ ~--------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) · (~) $ 1,596.93 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following . additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: ADD: Contractor's lette~ dated July 31, 1979 and Districts' letter dated August 1, 1979. 1. Revising method of shoring and boring operations as initially quated due to underground piping ~nd duct not shown o~ Plans. TOTAL ADD • No extension of contr~ct time for this change order. .. $1,596.93 $1,596.93 Original C0ntract Price $_2_6_,_6_6_4_._o_o ____ _ Prev. Auth. Changes $ _______ 0_._00 _________ _ This Change (ADD) Q{)~ $ __ 1_,5_9_6_.9_3 ____ _ Amended Contract Price $ 28,260. 93 Board authorization date: September 12, 1979 Approved: P. R. BURKE CORPORATION ·By ____________________________ __ Contractor . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California · By _____________________________ ~- Chief Engineer "L" AGENDA ITEM #10(1) -ALL DISTnICTS "L" .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. ~ox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE" FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE. ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A----~------------- \._J C.O. N0. ____ 2 ______ ~-------------- CONTRACTOR: P. R. BURKE CORPORATION DATE August 28, 1979 Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal JOB: Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074 ------------~~~~--~~~--~~--~----~----------~------~---------------- Amount of t~is Change Order (ADD} ~~lit~ $ 8,236.36 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes ·in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated August 24, 1979. ADD: 1. Additional costs t9 trench basin floor to complete installation of requil:ed pipeline due to obstruction not shown on Plans encountered during boring operation. . . . The·Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for the above mentioned item $8,236.36 . TOTAL ADD $8,236.36 18 Calendar Days · .. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TI.ME ""-1' Original Contract Date :original Contract Time · Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date June 28, 1979 45 Calendar Days August 11, 1979 18 Calendar Days 18 Calendar Days 63 Cal'endar Days ·August 29, 1979 Original Contract Price $_2_6_,_6_6_4_._o_o ____ ~--~- Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,596.93 . . -------~--~~~--~ This Change (ADD) ~t:Wt~ $ 8,236.36 ------~~-----~--~ Amended Contract Price $ 36,497. 29 . Board authorization date: September 12, 1979 Approved: P~ ·R. BURKE CORPORATION ~y -------~--------------------------Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By ______ ~----------------~------- Chief Engineer "M". AGENDA ITEM #lO(J) -ALL DISTRICTS "M" ... "N" RESOLUTION NO. 79-123 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-074 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING INSTALLATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIER NO. 1 SLUDGE WITHDRAWAL PIPE AT RECLAMATION PL.t\NT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-074, AS COMPLETE, AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, P. R. Burke Corporation, has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for INSTALLATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIER NO. 1 SLUDGE WITHDRAWAL PIPE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-074, on August 29, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said reconunendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Job No. PW-074 is hereby accepted as C0119?lete in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated June 28, 1979; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Complet~on therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closout Agreement with P. R. Burke Corporation setting forth the terms and considions for acceptance of Installation of Primary Clarifier No. 1 Sludge Withdrawal Pipe at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-074, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a r0gular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #lO(N) -ALL DISTRICTS "NII COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER '-..I GRANT NO. ___ N_A __________________ __ 1 c.o.· No·--------------------~-CONTRACTOR: ___ B_Y_RO __ N __ L_._c_·R_U_ME~, __ I_N_c_. ____________ _ DATE ________ s_e_p_t_emb~e_r __ 4_,_._1_9_19 ______ __ JOB: Pressure Manhole and Street Repair near Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW-076 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (»X»~XX) $ 2,527.61 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby aP.proved. . . ADD: ~ Remo~al of sewage water £rom pipeline including pumping, . eqUipment rental, traffic control, and additional ···excavation and compaction within Ellis Avenue .·TOTAL ADD ~he Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for the above work , '".SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME '..,I ·Original Contract Date -Original Contract Time ·Qriginal Completion Date ~ime Extension this Change Order ~otal Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date July 11, 1979 30 Calendar Days August 9, 1979 6 Calendar Days 6 Calendar Days 36 Calendar Days August 15, 1979 $2,527.61 $2,527.61 6 calendar Days Original Contract Price $ 14,500.00 --------------------- ~oard authorization date: ·13YRON L. CRUME, INC." Pre v. Auth. Changes $· o.oo --------~----~----Th ts Change (ADD) (H~tltl~~) $ 2,527.61 --------~----------- Amended Contract Price $ 17,027.61 September 12, 1979 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California ~ ·By -----------------------------------By------------------------~----- Contractor Chief Engineer "O" AGENDA ITEM #10(L) -ALL DISTRICTS "O" "P" RESOLUTION NO. 79-124 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-076 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY;CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PRESSURE MANHOLE AND STREET REPAIR NEAR ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, JOB NO. PW-076, AS COMPLETE, AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Byron L. Crume, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for PRESSURE MANHOLE AND STREET REPAIR NEAR ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, JOB NO. PW-076, on August 15, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby-received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Job -No. PW-076 is hereby accepted as complete in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated July 11, 1979; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Byron L. Crume, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Pressure Manhole and Street Repair Near Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. PW-076, is hereby, approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of t~e· Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No, 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #10(M) -ALL DISTRICTS "P" RESOLUTION NO. 79-125 APPROVING EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATJO~S FOR JOBS NOS. P2-24-1A, lB AND lC A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOLIDS TRANSPORT AND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR SOLIDS HANDLING AND DEWATERING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOBS NOS. P2-24-1A, 18 AND IC * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed equipment specifications and.contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, for SOLIDS TRANSPORT AND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR SOLIDS HANDLING AND DEWATERING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOBS NOS. P2-24-1A, lB AND IC, are hereby approved and adopted; and, ·"-"' Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, • Section 3. That the Ge~eral Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. that the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "Q" AGENDA ITEM #lO(N) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q" ·r RESOLUT1 ON NO. 7~>-l 2b APPROVING PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR .lOB NO. P2-24-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-24-2 * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, · 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY.RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for DEWATERING FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-24-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General, Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Se·cretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "R" AGENDA ITEM #lOCo) -ALL DISTRICTS "R" "S" August 21, 1979 Board of Directors County Sanitation D1str1ot·No. 2 P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Gentlemen: We the undersigned property owners request annexation to the County Sanitation District No. 2. Enclosed are the documents for Part I of the annexation and a check for the amount of $5000.QQ to cover the processing cost. Sincerely yours: a. itsue Oza~~ I r ~/· . '7 • '-1J. ~ /. -7 ~ L /.a~-., ,--;>,//I~ l?.atsy Light AGENDA ITEM #lOCv) -DISTRICT 2 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 79-130-5 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-22 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans,, specifications and contract document5 this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Clifford L. Forkert, District's engineer, for construction of BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER,, CONTRACT NO. 5-22,, are hereby approved and adopted; and,, Section 2. That the project for construction of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,, Contract No. 5-22,, is hereby approved,, and that the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,, as amended; and,, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and· read; and,, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Boards and the· District's engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #lO(x) -DISTRICT 5 · "T" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHJ\NGE. ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_A----------~----- ~ C .O. NO. _____ l~~--~---------- DATE August 22, 1979 CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. --~--~~~--~--~--~--~- JOB: Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~K~ $ 6,103.31 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes ·in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD: 1. Remove grouted riprap from invert of Santa Ana River over siphon excavation area;· Upon completion of trench backfill, replace loose riprap in accord- ance with County EMA requirements •. Labor .· ·. Equipment $2,839.73 3,263.58 Total ; :$.6., 103. 31 . . .. The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of ... five calend~r days for the above item. ~1ARY OF CONTRACT TIME . Original Contract Date · Original. Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Totai Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Original May 24, 1979 : 90 calendar Days August 21, 1979 5 Calendar Days 5 Calendar Days 95 Calendar Days August 26, 1979 Contract Price $ Prev. Auth. Changes $ .. This Change (ADO) et>"t:tmecl{) $ Amended Contract Price $ Board authorization date: September 12, 1979 Approved: 357,000.00 o. oo· 6,103.31 363,103.31 ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California •. ·l!1-------------~-----~------------- By __________________ ~--~~----- Contractor Chief Engineer . "U"· .. . AGENDA ITEM #lOCv) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "U" "V" COUNTY SANITATION OISTR,ICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10644 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 September 5, 1979 S T A F F R E P 0 R T IN-PLANT CONNECTION OF A-B TRUNK WHICH SERVES DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 (714) 540-2910 (714)962-2411 The combined flows from District No. 5 and the southerly portion of District No. 6 tributary to the Coast Highway enter Plant No. 2 via the siphon under the Santa Ana River. A 36-inch and 39-inch clay pipe is aligned adjacent to the ocean outfall booster station between "A" digester and the chlorination facilities and near the present operators' control building. When the present 11 C'11 headworks was constructed in 1965, the 39-inch clay pipe was diverted to an existing 54-inch unlined reinforced concrete pipe. On Friday, August 17th, a failure in the asphalt paving adjacent to the operators' control center was observed. Investigation revealed that a portion of the 54-inch reinforced concrete pipe had failed which required emergency repairs to avoid a complete failure of the sewer system. Further investigation of the manhole structures revealed a highly deteriorated system which should be replaced or ~ repaired as soon as possible. The staff, after discussion with the Chairman of District No. 5, secured the services of John A. Artukovich and Sons to assist in the repair of the damaged 54-inch RCP. The work was completed by August 21st at a cost of $4,144.73. Concurrently, the staff, recognizing the need to expedite the align- ment of a new sewer line connecting the River siphon to the headworks facilities within Plant No. 2, contacted Shaller and Lohr, an engineer familiar with District No. 5 facilities and have received a proposal to investigate various alignments within the Plant, prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the required pipeline and to assist with construction staking and other services during the construction phase. Preliminary estimates indicate a cost of approximately $400,000 to provide the reliability of the system. Staff is therefore requesting: A. B. Ratification of the action of the Chief Engineer for the emergency repairs in the amount of $4,144.73 to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Acceptance of the proposal from Shaller and Lohr in an amount of $26,000 lump sum for the preparation of the plans and specifications for the required facilities as well as the per diem rates to assist in the construc- tion staking and other related construction activities in a maximum amount not to exceed $7,500. AGENDA ITEM #lO(z)(l) -DIST~ICTS 5 & 6 "V" RESOLUTION NO. 79-131 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SHALLER AND LOHR, INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF CONNECTION OF SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON TO HEADWORKS "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, CONTRACT NO. 5-21-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SI-IALLER AND LOHR, .. INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF CONNECTION OF SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON TO HEADWORKS "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, CONTRACT NO. 5-21-1 * * * *· * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange 'county, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and ~~~~~~~~~~~- between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 and Shaller and Lohr, Inc. for engineering services in connection with design of Connection of Santa Ana River Siphon to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Contract No. 5-21-1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum fee of $26,000 for Phase I work and on a per diem fee basis for an amount not to exceed $7,500 for Phase II work; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 5 a~e hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation District No. 6 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "W" AGENDA ITEM #10(z)(3) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "W" . f' "EXHIBIT /\" PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: To: Board of Directors County SRnitotion District No. P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection - Example: in the city of Orange, ~ear the inter~~ction of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) ·:trJt'~ (·d ii·' 1 't · /. < l .. I ·~ l ., 1.: i. and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in ~ccordance with the District's annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: ....... ·=: "!:.. • • Property Owner (If more than one, attach separate listing) Name: Address: City & State:. Telephone No.: Gross Acreage: (to nearest hundredth) Assessed Value (If more than one parcel, attach separate listing) .. Number of Registered Voters: Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environme~tal Impact Report if prepared). Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. _,,,. ......... Signat.ure of Prope:.;-ty Owner (s) ,. . ;/ . . ·. -'~' / i • I_:---t ~ ._: , LJ__ J""'- (\, r,,"<' /1 v'l1 .. •• (!_/ t .• Jt .'1 I J ~I A A '· .~i.:l•J· . '/ . {V;;t.""·•,,-v ... 'V'-'vi.·- i I j I ( ,· 1 ,, ·'·lf:1 ,,.,, ,·.: .. ' ...... ,,~ '~,.'', a.\~ ••• • . ·:___:'~--·----------"JTTir-fr C-J---... ,) "X'r "X" AGENDA ITEM #10(BB) DI STRIC-r RESOLUTION NO. 79-132-7 APPROVING REIMBURSHIENT AGREEMENT (NON-MASTER PLAN SE\\'ER) WITH GREG JOHNSON A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SEWERAGE FACILITY REHIBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NON-MASTER PLAN SE\\'ER) WITH GREG JOHNSON * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'Ibe Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement .Agreement dated , between County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and ~~~~~~~--- Greg Johnson, providing for reimbursement by the District for construction of local sewer line within the 7th Sewer Maintenance District from the intersection of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive extending for approximately 500 feet in Skyline Drive, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement ·on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That reimbursement is hereby authorized pursuant to the terms and conditions of said Reimbursement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED· at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "Y" AGENDA IJEM #lOCnn) -DISTRICT 7 "Y" RESOLU'l ION I\u. 7!1-133-11 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. 11-13-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOJt\lA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR COAST TRUNK' SEWER, REACH 1 N\D 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVEl\'UE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2, AND AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE AWARD DATE UPON RECEIPT OF GRANT APPROVAL FROM SWRCB * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board.of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Keith and Associates, District's Engineers, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. and John A. Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture for COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1 AND 2, PORTION OF NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2, and "the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. and John A. Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture in the total amount of $7;488,964.53, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be auth- orized upon receipt of authority to award from the State Water Resources Control Board; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the effective award date for said contract upon receipt of said authority to award from the State Water Resources Control Board for said project; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are herd"')' rejected "Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 11 "Z-1" and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders . . \_,) P.ASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hel~ September 12, 1979. ·11 z-2 11 AGENfiA ITEM #26 -DISTRICT 11 "Z-2" ( CONTRACT Ne( · 11-13-2 Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 & 2, Portion of Newland Street August( . , 1979 11:00 A.M. PROJECT TITLE __ _...I=n~t~e=r~c~e~p~t~o~r_,.;;,s~e~w~e=r_a=n~d-.....,.;·L-·a~k~e--..A_v~e~n-u_e_·~R~e~li~··e~·f;;;.....;s~e~w~e~r;.__ __________________________________________________ ~:- PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 7,500,000.00 1. J> G'> rn ::2: CONTRACTOR John A. Artukovich Sons, ?nc. and John A. Artukovich, Jr., a Joint Venture Azusa, California BUDGET AMOUNT $· ------------------- SUBTOTAL DEDUCTION TOTAL $ 8,624,964.53 ($1,136,000.00) $ 7,488,964.53 ~-.. ~~~~~~----~---------:0--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --L K. E .c. Company $ 8,820,397.74 . ($ 820,397.74) $ 8,000,000.00 Corona,. California ::i:t:3 • Steve P. Rados N en $ 9,576,048.58 ($ 300, 000. 00) $ 9,276,048.58 Santa Ana, California Dorfman Construction $10,802,768.95 ($1,170,000.00) $ 9,632,768.95 Los Angeles, California Perini Corporation {$ 700,000.00) $10,8i7,297.00 $11,517,297.00 San Francisco, California 6. 7. 8. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 79-134-11 APPROVING AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, RE CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM TI-IE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE COAST TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-13-2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Agreement and Grant of Easement dated ------~~~---------- wherein a temporary and permanent underground sewer easement in the vicinity south- ·easterly of the centerline of Pacific Coast Highway from Brookhurst Street to Lake Street is granted to County Sanitation District No. 11, is hereby approved and accepted from the State of California, Department of General Services (Parks & Recreat~) and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and ·11 B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with the Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2; and, Section 4. That payment in the amount of $24,275.00 for said temporary easement and $104,000.00 for said permanent easement is hereby authorized pursuant to said Agreement and Grant_ of Easement; and, Section 5. Tha:t the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement and Grant of Easement on behalf of the District,V in form approved by the General Counsel; and, "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #27 -DISTRICT 11 "BB-1" Section 6. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation -...._,; District No. 11 be authorized and directed to record said Agreement and Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1979. "BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #27 -DISTRICT 11 "BB-2" 800 ORANGEFAIR LANE ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92801 "August 23, 1979 The Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 ·Attn: Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager Dear Board Members: During the period of July 9, to July 21, 1979, the Sanitation District completed a Sa~pling and Evaluation Program of our wastewater discharge to the public se~er system. The program resulted in fees for non.-complia~1ce in the amount of $4,754.00. Copy of the evaluatio~ and bill is attached. The purpose of this letter is a Request for Relief of these fees for the following reasons: 1. • 2. 3. "CC-1" Up until this time we had implemented several costly progra~s with equipment to somehow meet the compliance standards of the Permit Require- ments in the amount of $25,100 . We endeavared to so called "play the game ho:i.estly" so as to get an ho~est picture of our position. By this I mean that we could have put additives in our clearifier to show absolute compliance with the requirements for chromium and cadmium limits. However, we would not get a true picture of our compliance or non-compliance as the case would be. It is agreed that we ~ould not do so in the case of the.nickel. Since this Evaluatio:i. Program we have initiated additional measures so as to attempt to come into compliance at an additional cost of in excess of 1 $6,000. !~ ·,-~·~DA ITEM #30 (A) -DISTRICT 2 "CC-1" ·r BOO ORANGEFAIR LANE ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92801 (714) 526-4611 -(714) 526-2400 August 23, 1979 Board Members Orange County Sanitation Districts 4. Currently we are beginning another phase to improve compliance, ~hich will be an additional $4,000.00. I am Requesting Relief from these fees in the amount of $4,070. due to the above reasons.. It is believed we shall be in compliance by January 1, 1980. These funds would greatly improve our ability to r~~ain in business. Your consideration on this request will be greatly appreciated by all of Monitor Plating & Anodizing. \.,_) Thanking you very much, I remain yours Respectfully President AGENDA. ITEM #30(A) -DISTRICT 2 "CC-2" S eptembe r 12, 1979 Mt g . Note s -a ) Report of the Joint Chairman Fox reported he attended the CASA Conference in Monterey August 22 -25. One of the high points wa s presentation made and analysis of Gann In i tiative . Mentioned t hat there was a copy of this in Directors ' folders . Said his city Fi nance Director had checked this out and had a couple questions . Advised that there would be no meeting of the Executive Committee for September. (A meeting was called by Fox at a later date). Said FAH has requested a meetin g of the Fiscal Policy Committee which will be set later after checking with J i m Sharp . Wi l l notify Directors . Re CASA meeting , advised Don Winn was elected as Director at Large as District representative for OCSD. Asked Don to report on meet ing . Don Winn stated that he was the representative to CASA as far as the Executive Board was concerned as Director at Large. Also serve on l egislative committee. Make recommendations to Executive Director, Mike Di llon, re wha t bills to support or oppose . Said he brought some copies of Executive Director's report. Are some things that are interesting with respect to legislature. Advised that there were over 3500 bills introduced this year. Reported that during CASA meeting Paul DeFalco gave some information on what lies ahead in hazardous waste. Main emphasis was on prevention . Al so Don Maughn (sp?) Chairman of the State Resources Board , spoke and invite d Roy Hanson , Executive Director ._.. of Board . Advis e d that CASA has problem with Tahoe-Trucke e area . Were looking for fact-finding group to spend some t i me and decide whether CASA can back them against Regional Board or not. Advised that Larry Walker , Executive Director of State Board, resigned and is now looking for a job . (7-b) Report of the Gen e ral Manager FAH called attention to Supplemental Agenda . Opened bids on thr ee items . Recommending award on first two . Other proj ec t came in considerab l y over engineer 's estimate . Recommend rejecting bids and authorize negotiation for some typ e of purchase contract and will bring that back to Board next month . Item (d) is because of the change in the retirement system by County . Effective September 21st new employees are under a di ffe rent deduction per c entage and benefits will be somewhat reduced under that program . Need to do computer programming for new employees . Re i tem (e) , said in the past we have had a lease with Nakase Brothers for small piece of property in right-of-way between our plants . They g row plants in containers . Didn 't feel this was a big e n o ugh proposal to go out for public bid . Do have esca l ation clause in th e re . Re i tem (f), had a br eakdown in one o f our l arge engine s . Don't know cost yet but i s an emeregenc y thi ng . Advised that tomorrow we will be mail ing the wa i ver ap p lication we h ave been talking about for 5 -6 year s . One of the fin est docume nts that he has seen go out of this o rga ni zat ion. Very pl ea sed ~ith what h as been d on e . Very professional . Very good technica l document . Think it answers all of the statements we have made ov=1 the last few years. Principally due to REL and Dennis .Re i d and Kr is Lindstrom , who was at one time an employee of ours. Kris has done a lot of the work and guts of it. In our lab, thank ed Gregg and Mike and JCE . Mentioned also the girls that typed and retyped it al l--Hilary & Sher (forgot a ll Wilber 's work). Said if we don't get a waiver, n o one should get one . Said Directors may recall that last month we reporte d re flow equalization project which may be do~n the tube because we need a environmental report . Received a call and REL and Dennis met with them today . May have something to re port at the nex t meeting . Will discuss odor problem at Plant No . 2 later in a ge n da . (7 -c) Report of the General Counsel Said he didn 't really have a report . Wasn't at CASA Conference . Still no action on Cease & Desist Order . Attorney General has either lost it or give up on it. (8) Presentation of Placque to Lindsley Parsons Don Fox pr e sented placque in appreciation fo r services from 1 969 -79 as Districts ' Commissione r and Preside nt of SCCWRP . Lindsley Parson s that spoke to Directors . Went back over some of the things h e a n d the Districts had done since 1966. (shal l ow -bowl to il et , etc .) Praised FAH and Executive staff . Has seen operations at other p lants and Orange County is th e best . (10) CONSENT CALENDAR I ( I (n) (o) Yamamota asked if this just a ratification and is this the notice that he r e ad in the paper already? REL answered there is two separate projects . The project in the paper was for the di gester . This one is fo r digester equipment . Yamamoto ask ed sta ff to exp l a in re P2 -24 -2 . REL said i t is part of th e improved treatment at Plant No . 2 . P2 -24 -l is out for bid at the present t ime a n d is to construct four new d i geste rs and appurtenances . P2 -2 4 -2 is for dewa t er in g equipme nt that wil l dewater dige s ted slu dge . Also included in this is storage facility after sludge i s dewat ered , truck loading fac ility , a n d r e habilitation of some of the facilities built in 19 52 . (1 1 ) Removed from Consen t Ca l endar -Job No . J -13-2 R (10) (b) FAH reported that last month we received authority from the Board to negotiate on th i s pro ject . Engineer's estimate was $175,000 . At the time we went out for bids , received no bid proposals . Chief Engineer d id solic i t bids again from p l ans and specification list and did receive four proposals . Negotiated and best price we could come up with is $1 99 ,000. Staff considers $199 ,00 0 as the price of the job and is recommendi ng this. REL added that low bidder has indicated ther e are some cost savings possible and will cc~e ~ack 'f ~e cons i der them. ~oved , seconded a nd c arried to award . -2 - (12) Facilities Plan FAH advised that we have wa stewater fac ili ties that we plan to build in the future and as part of our appl ication for waiver, will have to adopt a resolution (No . 79-1 36). Asked RE L to briefly explain what we propose . Said we didn 't get the report to Directors because of the push of time . REL reported that this is a very voluminous report contained in Vo lume 3 of our application and will have the report available for Directors to wish at the next Board meeting. Report says we will meet Federal requirements, whate ve r they are . Presently r equi rements are 30/30. Through the year 2000, wi ll cost $362 million for fu ll secondary treatment for up to 285 mgd . Presently 200mgd . If we get waiver , will save $113 ,700,000 . Ward asked if 1/4 billion was with escalation clause and was answered yes , as best we can anticipate escalation . Fox entertained a motion to approve resolution. Moved , seconded and carried . (14) Fiscal Pol i cy Committee appointment Strauss withdrew as a nominee because of lack of time to attend mtgs . The Directors requested that the Joint Chairman appoint a member fro~ the other two nominees--Wieder and Hutchison. (appointed Wieder later) 15) DISTRICT 3 Chairman pro tern Nominated Rowan and Graham for Chairman pro tern . Graham withdrew from nomination. Rowan e l ected . (28) DISTRICT 11 -Other business MacAllister brief l y reported re odor problems at Plant No. 2. Said he was aware of what probl ems were but thought cost to mitigate is small compared to complaints . FAH advised that the problem we have are a numbe r of odors, par tly becaus e of weather but primary problem is because of construct i on at headworks. Contractor is making that excavation now . Very diff icul t job . Evacuation line to remove fo ul odors had to be taken out so h aven 't been able to use their odor scrubber unit . In addition , water supply to chlorine unit has been disrupt ed . Also have had difficulty ge tting chlorine . A whole series of probl em s. People are getting very disturbed. Numerous phone calls and threats to stop operation . Is rath er serious. Said the staff would be coming up with something this next week to get some thing done a s soon as possibl e and will come back to Board with long -range program. Would advise Don MacA ll ister at City Hall when we decide what we are going to do . (33-c) DISTRICT 3 -Maurice Deushane request Graham stated that she thought this would be sett in g a precedent if we were to grant this . -3- 9-12-79 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT ON THE ANNUAL WORK CONFERENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES HELD IN MONTEREY AUGUST 22-25. ATTENEING WERE CHAIRMAN DON FOX, CHAIRMAN JIM SHARP AND DON WINN. NO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING IS PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER-BUT THE STAFF IS REQUESTING THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE TO MEET AT 11:00 A,M,, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25TH, MEET Ir lG JJi.1 E __ ~_:._:__ er 12, 1 979 T IM !: ·;:30 p .m. DISTR ICT S 1,2 ,3,5,6 ,7&11 ~~~~'---'-~~~- DI STRICT l !SCHU ST ER).···. SHAR P . · · ...• a,.; YAMAMOTO) .. ••· WARD· .••...• l/ == == R I LEY) •.• •·••. ANTHONY·· ...• ~ CRANK).······. HUTCHI SON····~==== DISTRICT 2 (FRIED) .•••...• WEDAA ••.•••• ~ (RA SHFORp) ....• H OLT·········~==== ! GMiB IN A) •••.•• FO X ...••.••• --.L-___ _ \I/ELL S) ......•• HOUSTON •.•.. -~ ___ _ ANTHONY) .••..• MILLER •.•..•. ~ ___ _ CULVER) ...•.•• PERRY .•...••• ~ ___ _ GRAHAM) .••...• ROGET .·······~ (SE YMOUR) ...... RO TH •.•...•• ~==== (HO YT) ....•... SM ITH .••.•.• ·~ (SVAL STAD) .•.•. STANTON······~==== (WINTERS) ..•... VELASQ UEZ····~ (W ARD) ...•.• ··. YAMAMOTO •.. ·~==== DI STR ICT 3~ . (NYBORG). ) •••.• FRESE........ V' SVALSTAD ••..• ADLER .•• ,,,, ,=z'.: ---- MACALl-I STE~) .• BAILEY.,,,, .• ~ ---- .PL~RY ). • • • • • • · E-l'JLVE~ .• , .. , • _LL: ---- COL LACOT )·····FIN LA YSON .•. ·---.L. ---- COR BETT), •. , .. GRAHAM ••.... , • _.iL.. == == GAMBINA). • ... b.li 1"2:R8~J .... -~ ___ _ GR IFFIN)······REESE· ...•... ~ SEnmuR)······ROTHf.'~·~ == == EVANS)········ROWAN ~. -~ LASZLO ) .•.•.•. SEITZ· •...... __1L_ ---- OMM I CKJ ...••. SYL VI A ...•.. ·-&.L.. ---- ANTHONY) ...••. WI EDER •. ·····~ !WH EELER) ...... WEISHAUPT ... -~==== . VEL ASQ UEZ). •.. \'/I NTERS .•.•• ·2 ---- WARD) ••••.•... YAMAMOTO ..... -------- DI STR ICT 5 (HUMM E L)~ •..... fn'@l<Ol'F. . . . .. .,/ (RYCKOFF •••.•. STRAUSS .•.•.. -;;.;;:----- (ANTH ONY .•••.. RILE Y •••••.• ·~==== DISTRICT 6 (RYCKOf F) ••.•.. MC I NN J S •...• ~ (CR ANK) .....• '..HUTCH I SON ..• -~ ---- (RILEY) •••••... ANTHONY······~==== DI STRICT 7 (HOYT) • ·······SM ITH ········ ../ . (RYCKOFF)···· .:WILLIAMS···· .-11...!_ == == !~/AHNER }, •••..• GLOCKNER -.L ANTHONY) .•. , •• MI LL ERr.:::::~ == == S ILL S )···· .•.. VARDOULI S .••• ~ ___ _ YAMAl~QTO) · • • · . WARD ...•...• ; ~ ___ _ SCHUSTER)····. WELSH •••••.•• ~ ___ _ DISTR ICT 11 (M ACA LLJST ER ) .. PA TTIN SON •.. ·~ (MAND I C) ......• MACALLI S T ER.·~ ---- (ANTHON Y) ...•.. \'/I EDER •.•.... __,e: == == 8/8/79 JO l t~T BOARD S (SV/\LSTAD)· ····ADLER ······~ __ (RI LEY).······ ·ANTHONY ····~ MACA Ll-1$T ER )··BAILEY·····~ == P ERRY )······· ·CULVER ····· - COLL ACOTT ) ····FINLAYSON ··~ -- GAMB I NA )······ FOX ······· ·---.L -- NYBOR G) .. ·····FRESE ······~== \·/AHNER)······· GLOCKNER ···~ CORB ETT)····· ·GRAHAM ····· V -- (R AS HF ORD) ·····HOL T ······ .V--- WELL S )······· ·HOUSTON ····~ -- CR ANK)······· ·HUTCHISON ·· V'° -- GAMB ItJ A) •.••. ·Is l! BJ\Ren .. ·~ -- MAND IC)······ ·MACAL LI STE R == RY C KOFF) •... ··MC INNI S ··· ANTHONY) · · • · · · !'~ ! LLER · • • • · V" == MA CALLISTER)·· PATTINSON ··~ tULVER). ······PERRY······~ -- GRIFFIN)····· ·REESE······ ~ == ANTHON Y) · · • • · ·R I LE Y· · • • • · V"" GRAHAM) ..••. • ·R OGE T······~ -- SEYMOUR)· · · · · ·ROTH·· • • • • • __{),,£_ -- EVA NS)· · · · • • • ·ROWAN ·· • • · • "-"" -- HUMMEL)······· fO'@lt8FF · · • · ~ == LASZLO)······· SEl'TZ · • • ~ · -~ __ (SCHUS T ER}····· SHARP······~ __ (HOYT)·········SMfTH····· ·~ ( S\' ALST AV) · · · • · ST ANTON· • • · ...,.... == (RYC KOFF )······STRAUSS ····~ (ZOM MI CK)· ·····SY LV IA···· ·-JL_ -- (SILLS)·· •.•••. VA RDO ULI s . ·~ -.- (W INTERS)······ VELASQUEZ · ._;,,e:-- (Y AMAMOTO ). ····WARD · .•.•• ·--'.L -- (FRI ED)······· ·WEDAA· • • • • · ~ -- SHEE LER)····· ·WE I S HAUPT··~ -- SCHUSTER)···· ·W E L SH······~ -- ANTHONY ) •..•.• WIEDER·····~== RYCKOF F)··· ···WILLIAMS ···~ VEL ASQ UEZ) ...• WINTERS •• ··~ -- WARD) ••••••••. YAMAMOTO •• -~ -- OTHERS HARPER ••••• ___ _ SYLVESTER .• ___ _ LEW I S ••.••• ___ _ CLA RKE ••• · • ___ _ BROWN ••.••• ___ _ WOODRUFF •• • ___ _ HOHENER •••• ___ _ HOWARD · · · • • ___ _ HU NT· •.•..•• ___ _ KEITH······ ___ _ KE NNEY ..••• ___ _ LYNCH ••...• ___ _ MADDOX .••.• ___ _ MART IN SO N .• ___ _ PI ER SAL L ••• ___ _ STE VEN S •••• ___ _ TRAVERS .••• ___ _ MEETING DATE Septembe r ' . -' DISTRICT 1 !SC HUSTER).···. SHARP ••••••• YAMAMOTO). · · • . WARD · • · • .•.. ------ RI LEY) ••..•.•. ANTHON~·····====== CRANK).······. HUTCHISON· .•• _____ _ DISTRIC T 2 (FR I ED).· • • • • • • WEDAA • • • • • • • (RASHFORp) .•••• HOLT·········====== GAMBINA) •• , ••• FCX , ••••.••• ~/ELLS) •••••.•• HOUSTON •..••. ------ ANTHONY).····. MILLER .••.••. ------ CULVER) •.••.•• PERRY········====== GRAHAM) ••. · · · . ROGET ..• • • ..• SEYMOUR) .... •• ROTH · .•.•.•• ------ HOYT) .••••••. SMITH ··· ••.•• ------ (SVALSTAD) ••... STANTON ..•..• ------ (WINTERS).····. VELASQUEZ· ••• ------ (WARD) .•.•••••• YAMAMOTO == == == DISTRICT 3 . (NYBORG). )" ••.• FRESE .••••.•• SVALSTAD ••.•• ADLER .•• ,.,,,------ MACALl-I STE~) •. BA ILEY.,.,,,.------ .PLqRY ). • • • • • • • CULVER .•••• , • ------ COLLACOT ). ····FINLAYSON .•.• ------ CORBEJ T ) •••••• GRAHAM •• , .• , , ------ GAMB I NAl ·····.LE BARON ••.•• ------ GR I FF IN ······REESE········====== SEYMOUR ······ROTH········· EVANS)········ ROWAN · ..••••. ------ LAS Z LO).··· .. ·S EITZ· .•.••.• ------ OMMICK .l .•... -SY LVIA .· .•••• ·====== !WHEELER ••...• WE I SHA UPT •••• ANTHONY ....•• WIEDER .••.••• ------ . VELASQUEZ) .... WINTERS ••••.• ------ WARD) ..••.••.• YAMAMOTO ••••• ------ DISTRICT 5 (H UMMEL\ •.•.•. RlfCKOFF ...... ./ (RYCKOFF J •••• ·.STR AUSS •.•••. -V ---- (ANTHONY) ••.•.• RI LEY········ v == == DISTRICT 6 (R YCKOFF ) ••••• -MC INNI S -.•.• v" (CRANK) •••••• · •. HUT CH ! SON ..•. -r ---- (RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY ••••.. ~==== DISTRIC T 7 (H OYT) ········SM ITH········ / (RYCKO FF)·· ····WILLIAMS···· .-0::----- !\·/AHNER), •••••• GLOCKNER -y----- ANTHON Y) ••. , .~MILLER~.::::: ~ == == S I LLS )·····.·. VARDOULI S. ~.. ./ YAMAl'.Q TO) ·····WARD· ••.•••• .--r-== == SCHUSTER )····. WELSH ••••..•• _./ ____ _ DISTR ICT 11 (M ACALL J STER) •. PATTINSON •.•• v' · (M AND IC) ....••. MACALLISTER.-~ ---- (ANTH ONY) ..•••. WIEDER •..••. -~==== 8/8/7 9 JOJ NT BOARDS (S VALS TAD)· ····ADLER ······ ___ _ (RILE Y) .. ····· ·~NTHONY ·. · · MACALl-I~TER)· ·BAI LE Y·····==== PERRY) •. ···•· ·CULVER····· COLLACOTT)-···FINLAYSON ·.---- GAMBINA) ······FOX ·······.---- NYBORG) • • • • · ··FRESE ·····.---- WAHNER) ... ·•· ·GLOCKNER···==== CORBETT)······GRAHAM ····· RASH FORD)····· HOL T······.---- WEL LS)······· ·HO USTON ···.---- CRANK)······· ·HU TCHISON ··==== GAMBINA)······LE BARON ··· MANDIC)·······MACAL LI STER-=== == RYCKOFF)······MC I NNIS ··· .ANTHONY) • .• • • • ·~I LL ER · • • • · == == MA CALLISTE R)·· PATT IN SON ·· ('CULVER).····· ·P ERRY ·····.-.--- GRIFFIN) •• •·· ·RE ESE ·····.---- ANT HONY) · • • • · ·RI LEY· • • • • • ---- GRAHAM)······· ROGET·····.---- SEYMOUR)····· ·ROTH ······.---- EVANS)········ ROWAN ·····.---- HUMMEL)······· RYCKOFF· ···== == LA SZ LO)······· SEJ'TZ · • · · · • (SCHUSTER}·····SHARP······== == (HOYT) .•..•••. ·SMTTH······ !SVALSTA{))·····STAN TON ····== == RYCKOFF) · • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ZOMM ICK) ······SYLVIA ····.---- (SILLS)········ VARDOULI S •. ----.-. !WINTER S )···· •• VELASQUEZ·.---- YAM AMO TO)· • • • ·~~ARD · ••...• ---- FR I ED)······· ·WEDAA · • · • · .---- !SH EELER)····· ·W E ISH AUPT ··==== SCHUSTER)·····WELSH ··· •·• ANTHONY) •••••• WI EDER ••••• ---- !RYCKOFF) ······WILLI AMS · •• ---- VELA SQ UEZ) •.•• WINTERS •••• ---- WARD) .•••••••. YAMAMOTO ••• :=== OTHERS ~ w~ l ~ti J.L fl Tu{;.~ f) tv.J -t~N:J~ ~&~ ~~ HARPER ..... v SYLVESTER · • _L_ == LE W I S • • . • • • ~ CLARKE • • • • • -r -- BROWN ••••.• ~== WOODRUFF... v ~--HOHEN ER .••• ___ _ HOWARD ••••• HU NT .. • ••••• =:;z:' == KEITH .····· ___ _ KEN NEY •••.• ___ _ LYNCH·.·.·· ___ _ MADDOX ••••• MART I NSON .• -Y-== PI ER SA LL ••• ___ _ STEVENS ••.• _. __ _ TRAV ERS •••• ___ _ ~./ : l' -y) ..... _, ti