Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-08-08 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , AREA COON DE 7ON 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 1 962 1 q�"�� - 41 1 P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 1, 1979 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, 5, G, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY. AUGUST 8, 1979 - 7:30 P51 10844 ELLIS *AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Board's of Directors of Count- Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 51 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. j! 'tary Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: Sear EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - None Scheduled COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS at ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 _ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE * FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)952-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES JOINT BOARD MEETINGS EXECUTIVE CON24ITTEE MEETINGS .August Aug 8, 1979 None -Scheduled September Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979 October Oct 10, 1979 Oct 2S, 1979 .November Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979 December Dec 12, 1979 Non Scheduled January Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980 February Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980 March Mar 12, 1980 Mar 26, 1980 April Apr 9, 1980 Apr 23, 1980 May May 14, 1980. May ' 28, 1980 June June 11, 1980 June 2S, 1980 July July 9, 1980 July 23, 1980 August Aug 13, 1980 Aug 27, 1980 'I EiVr"r1tl7S C7F UiittCiVitS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area JOINT BOARDS 962-411 AGENDA MEETING DATE ADJOURNMENTS POST..ED/..Z -AUGUST 8, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. COMP & MRLEACE.....K... FILES SET UP...... ....... ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED. ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR LETTERS WRITTEN...LI.... APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION; STAFF MINUTES WRITTEN........y� WILL BE AVAILABLE AT :00 P .M. IMMEDIATELY MINUTES FILED .i/ ,......,. PRECEDING WEDNESDAY� S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) DISTRICT 3 airman-pra_tem (,aW:WcQ) (5) Recognition of special guests (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any ALL DISTRICTS (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute•excerpts from the following regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates, ITEMS ON and seating new members of the Board SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA s: (*Mayor) Entity District(s) Active Alternate �'1\S Board of 1 F, 6 Philip L. Anthony Thomas F. Riley Supervisors 2 E 7 Edison W. Miller Philip L. Anthony 3 & 11 Harriett M. Wieder Philip L. Anthony S Thomas F. Riley Philip L. Anthony Midway City Sanitary Dist. 3 Bruce D. Finlayson Conner L. Collacott City of Tustin 7 Ralph Welsh,'Jr. Steven Schuster* District 6 - July 11, 1979, regular District 7 - July 11, 1979, regular District 11 - July 11, 1979, regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ._ Reports of: LETTER . t(b) Joint Chairman _ ABC _TKLR .M General Manager (c) General Counsel r ' (9) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE....,.,.,, , Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows; (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be rePvirded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director exproNses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 'Joint Operating Fund - See page +IA++ Capital 'Outlay Revolving Fund - See page. ++A++ DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE • DISTRICT NO. 2 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 3 - See papo . ++8++ DISTRICT NO. S NONE DISTRICT. N0. 6 . - NONE DISTRICTS S & 6 SUSPENCE - . See pap n "B++ DISTRICT NO. 7 _ See pagg ++B++ DISTRICT NO. 11. - NONE (10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS.10 (A) THROUGH10 ( U ) . All matters placed upon the consent calr.tidar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested Lo be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, stat'F member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving sill motions, . and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by-the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be • removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from `,d the consent calendar. ' Roll Cali Vote or Cost Consideration of action to approve all "Benda .items appearing Unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically .removed from same. . (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS !� (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of General Telephone Company of California, dated July 11, 1979, A/C ---JKLR -•• in the amount of $i50.66, for alleged damages to-telephone cable in connection with construction of Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment.at Plant No. 2; Job No. P2-23-6, and refer to the contractor and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action FILE ...... (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts' Superintendent LETTER —- to attend the Water Pollution Control- Federation's 52nd Annual A/C ....TKLR -- Conference in Houston, Texas, on October- 7-10, 1979; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses _.•_- incurred therefor • (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-110, approving plans and FILE �..✓ specifications for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon LETTER ____._ Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, and authorizing the A/C ._.TKLR General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "C" '�— (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-111, approving plans and specifications to Rebuild Two Climax Gas Engines LETTER and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for A/C ....TKLR�.. receipt of bids. See page "D" (e) Consideration of,motion authorizing the General Manager to ..-1fot negotiate and award purchase order for replacement of worn FILE gears on blower drive units for 46-MGD Activated Sludge LETTER .:_.._-- Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-16, for an A/C ....TKLR _ amount not to exceed $ 150,000 - � (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-108, approving Amendment - No. 2 to Amended Agreement re Sludge Hauling and Disposal with Golden West Fertilizer Company in connection with Specification No. 5-017, authorizing payment for standby time in the event FILE ....... ..__ the contractor is delayed by the Districts at the Treatment LETTER _� Plant for a period in excess of one and one-half hours before hauling material to the Coyote Canyon Landfill Site, and QA/C R _ authorizing a charge against the contractor for delays caused --- by the contractor in excess of one and one-half hours. ._.__.........._ See page "E" (g) Consideration of motion approving the Sale of Approximately FiL 10,000 Cubic Yards of Dewatered Semi-Composted Digested Sludge, I� pursuant to Specification No. 5-023, to Kellogg Supply Company, for the total amount of $1,000.00, and authorizing the General C TKLR — Manager to enter into an agreement for said sale (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (16) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) ME _...... (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fees for LETTER "'�-.-'- Butier Engineering, Inc. for additional construction A/C ....TKLR -.. management services in connection with 75-MCD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include �•------• Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24 - See page "F" ` (2) Consideration of Resolution No. .79-107, approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with Butier "Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with 75-MGD • Improved Treatment at Plant No.. 2, Job No. P2-23, to FILE -- - include additional construction management services for IETTE .. Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75-MGD Improved A/C ....TKLR Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job- No. P2-24, establishing classifications and per diem rates for said construction management services and authorizing an increase in extra professional services from $35,0-00 to $60,000, total combined compensation for Jobs P2-23 and P2-24'not to exceed the previously authorized maximum.of $510,000. See page (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-109, amending Positions and LETTER ....... Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, reclassifying certain A/C ....TKLR ._. positions. See page "H" -- DISTRICT 2 ' (j) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-113-2, ordering r annexation of 165.676 acres of territory to-the District in FILE ....... �.Cv✓ the vicinity of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive LETTEFer- and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed A/C ....TKLR Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation ----------•-•--• District No. 2 (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff, the FILE ..... ........... Amendment to Plan, Brea Redevelopment Agency Project, Area C, LErrt�E� and Notice of Public Hearing on Amendment to be held at 6:00 p.m. , A/C ....TKLR .... on August 21, 1979, at the Brea City Hall Council Chambers "'"..""""..... ' (1) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re subordination agreement with C-W Associates in connection with Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-114-2, approving and FILE authorizing execution of a subordination agreement with C-W LETTER fT� Associates relating to a Deed of Trust executed by C-W A/C ....TKLR _. Associates re Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "J" (CONSENT CALENDAR .continued on page 5) -4- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 3 �.! (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor FILE ............... Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, LEVER ......—'" Contract No. 3-13-1, authorizing an addition of $2,160.00 A/C ....TIQR --- for additional paving and traffic control adjustments to -... the contract with Colich 8 Sons, J.V. and granting a time ........_.. extension of 153 calendar days for completion of said work See page "K" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facility, FILE ----------------- Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, LETTER _._— authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for A/C -_.TKLR _- a total addition of $4,438.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons, J.V. See page "L" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-115-3, accepting Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second FILE ...........-- Unit, - Contract No. 3-13-1, as complete, authorizing execution LErre of Notice of Completion and approving Final• Closeout Agreement See page "M" A/ (p) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection -•--- Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with FILE Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services �./ re design of Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard LETTER _._.._.... Pumping Station. See page "N" A/C __TKLR .... --—µ (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-116-3, approving agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services re design of Additions to the LEnER - Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station, for a lump sum fee of $28,500.00. See page A/C ._.T (q) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional engineering FILE services in connection with design of the Orangethorpe LETTER — ; Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, to include design of A/C ._.TKLR Reaches 16 and 16A. See page "P" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-117-3, approving - -- Addendum No. 1 to the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk flu w µ Sewer, Reach 15, for additional engineering services j re design of Reaches 16 and 16A, authorizing an increase �TKLR _ in the total compensation from $49,966.78 to $115,000.00; c an increase in soils investigation service from $3,000.00 to $10,000.00; and an increase in surveying services from P $4,000.00 to $25,000.00. See page Nil (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT S FILE .»............... LETTER ..._ (r) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection A/c ...JnR _. Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with .......... Clifford A. Forkert for design of Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. See page "R" FILE -� (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-118-5, approving agreement with Clifford A. Forkert for engineering r g services A/c _.TxtR re design of Replacement of Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $23,000. See page "S" DISTRICT 6 " (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff, the FILE Statement of Preparation of Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment LTE KRE Project Area No. 2 (Wallace Neighborhood Strategy Area) in the A/c _.TKLR --- vicinity of Nineteenth Street and Placentia. Avenue and Preliminary • _..._.__,,,._. Plan for said area received from the Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency .......................... DISTRICT 11 (t) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 & 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake.Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract FILE --- No. 11-13-2, announcing a pre-bid conference to.be held on July 25; LETTER - and Addendum No. 2 to said plans and specifications for Contract A/c --•TK•R -" No. 11-13-2, indicating revised Federal requirements, changing the •-------•----�-- bid date from August 7 to August 9, 1979, making miscellaneous w..••..-•---•-- technical clarifications and including the Cal-Trans permit and RWQCB dewatering permit (u)' Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to LETTER negotiate with Butier Engineering, Inc. for consulting engineering services in connection with construction of the Coast Trunk • A/c -"M Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2 ......................... END OF CONSENT -CALENDARALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (12) ALL DISTRICTS - Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report FILE ................,(13) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER Consideration of action on items recommended 'by the Executive Committee: A/C ....MR .... .......... ,,, (a) Staff report on proposed -fiscal year 1979-80 budgets (b) DISTRICT 1 ROLL CALL VOTE...,,.,,..... M I Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (c) DISTRICT 2 ROLL CALL VOTE...,.....---(n/ Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (d) DISTRICT 3 ROLL CALL VOTE...........•.— Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (e) DISTRICT 5 ROIL CALL VOTE.,..,,, ,_„ Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (f) DISTRICT 6 -ROLL CALL VOTE..,,,,,,,,,,„45 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (g) DISTRICT 7 ROLL CALL VOTE..; . MI 5 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal .year budget l -ROLL "ALL VOTE ,-...,,,,_ (h) DISTRICT 11 05 Roll call vote motion. approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget FILE -- •- (14) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER .- Verbal staff report re status of construction grant for Flow Equalization A/C ....TKLR _. Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25 .......................... (15) ALL DISTRICTS . Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors of County Roil Call Vote or Cast Sanitation District No. 1 on July 25, 1979, adopting Resolution No. 79-106, Unanimous Ballot amending amendment to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment FILE ...-_..-.----.•» �r�, at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities LETTER at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25. See page "TI' A/C.....TKLR _....�•..._.. (16) ALL DISTRICTS Formal protest by H. C. Smith Construction Company of Chief Engineer's ruling on painting of insulated pipe for Job No. P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file formal protest by H. C. Smith Construction Company dated June 27, 1979. Seepage "U" E ��S (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re said A/C .--'IKLR protest. See page "V" •-- (.c) Consideration of motion to receive -and file report of General Counsel •- --•- re said protest. See page f1wit Consideration of action to either sustain the Chief Engineer'.s denial of said protest or rule in favor-- of the contractor's protest and authorize a change order to the contract in the amount of $12,570.00 t-ozl! -7- (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17-a) Consideration of action re Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R: NNW (No bids received at bid opening on 8/2/79. Therefore, staff recommends the following action.) f1tE ^•••.`••`."_'� ITEMS ON �E�FPLEMENTAL AGENDA Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate A/G . fK1K � a contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, for consideration by the Boards at the regular September meeting. (18) DISTRICT 1 Ottie and communications--or'supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DI TRICT 2 Oth ss and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn • (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for F:LE �----- VE Damages for Temporary Impairment of Access Based On Inverse Condemnation NT ON E ER �PLFMENTALAGENDA and Nuisance, Case No. 31-79-65, Erwin Hinden and Christa Hinden dba A/C ....TKLR __ Bill's Coffee Shop vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al., relative to the Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, ^•-•-•••--•--• and refer to contractor, General Counsel and Districts' liability claims „,_,.........- administrator for appropriate action (23) DISTRICT 3 �./ Consf(ideration of motion to adjourn k,,3� (24) DTSTtFICT S --� Othe bus and communications-or-supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT S. Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) D STRICT 6 0 er bu i ss and communic3t-ions-or-supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn Y;38 (23) DD TRI _ 0 Ter busi and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn 8;30 (30) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any FILE'- — (30-a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and LETTER .--- ITEMS ON specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2, Portion of Newland SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, A/C .... R ' making technical clarifications and indicating required compliance with _NPDES Permit re monitoring program ....... (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn 5' -R_ t;UARL)S Ut L)I *LU UR5 County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Change County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: � 714 JOINT BOARDS 96 Code AGENDA MEETING DATE AUGUST 8, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENj HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY - PRECED'ING WEDNESDAY�S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTSr BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) DISTRICT 3 Election of Chairman pro tem (5) Recognition of special guests (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any ALL DISTRICTS (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the g following regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates, ITESUPPLEMENTAL OAGENDA and seating new members of'the Boards: (*Mayor) Entity District(s) Active Alternate Board of 1 & 6 Philip L. Anthony Thomas F. Riley Supervisors 2 ✓; 7 Edison W. Miller Philip L. Anthony 3 4 11 Harriett M. Wieder Philip L. Anthony 5 Thomas F. Riley Philip L. Anthony Midway City Sanitary Dist. 3 Bruce D. Finlayson Conner L. Collacott City of Tustin 7 Ralph Welsh, Jr. Steven Schuster* District 6 - July 11, 1979, regular District 7 - July 11, 1979, regular District 11 - July 11, 1979, regular ' (8) ALL DISTRICTS ..� Reports of: j (a) Joint Chairman ��r col L� �a L (b) General Manager ' 7Ca (c) General Counsel . (9) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE„_,.,,,,. Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as 'follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ' ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - See page "A" Capital 'Outlay Revolving Fund - -See page "A" DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 3 - See page "B" DISTRICT NO. 5 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 - NONE DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENCE - See page IT" DISTRICT NO. 7 See page "B" DISTRICT NO. 11 - NONE 1 ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR I TEMS NOS.10 (A) THROUGHIO (U ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from ' the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition .by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. - Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing Unanimoousus Ballot specifically Roll Cal) or Cast on the consent calendar not s ecificall removed from same. -2- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of General Telephone Company of California, dated July 11, 1979, in the amount of $150.66, for alleged damages to telephone cable in connection with construction of Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, and refer to the contractor and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts' Superintendent to attend the Water Pollution Control Federation's 52nd Annual Conference in Houston, Texas, on October.7-10, 1979; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred therefor (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-110, approving plans and specifications for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "C" (d) . Consideration of Resolution No. 79-111, approving plans and specifications to Rebuild Two Climax Gas Engines and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "D" �./ (e) . Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase order for replacement of worn f gears on blower drive units for 46-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. 'P1-16, for an amount not to exceed $ 150,000 (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-108, approving Amendment No. 2 to Amended Agreement re Sludge Hauling and Disposal with Golden West Fertilizer Company in connection with Specification No. S-017, authorizing payment for standby time in the event the contractor is delayed by the Districts at the Treatment Plant for a period in excess of one and one-half hours before hauling material to the Coyote Canyon Landfill Site, and authorizing a charge against the contractor for delays caused by the contractor in excess of one and one-half hours. See page "E" (g) Consideration of motion approving the Sale of Approximately 10,000 Cubic Yards of Dewatered Semi-Composted Digested Sludge, pursuant to Specification No. 5-023, to Kellogg Supply Company, for the total amount of $1,000.00, and authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement for said sale (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection �..1 Committee Certification re final negotiated fees for Butier Engineering, Inc, for additional construction management services in connection with 7S-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24 - See page "F" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-107, approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with 7S-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include additional construction management services for • Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24, establishing classifications and per diem rates for said construction management services and authorizing an increase in extra professional services from $35,000 to $60,000; total combined compensation for Jobs P2-23 and P2-24 not to exceed the previously authorized maximum of $510,000. See page "_ G" (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-109, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, reclassifying certain positions. See page "H" DISTRICT 2 (j) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-113-2, ordering annexation of 165.676 acres of territory to the District in . the vicinity of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff, the. Amendment to Plan, Brea Redevelopment Agency Project, Area C, and Notice of Public Hearing on Amendment to be held at 6:00 p.m. , on August 21, 1979, at the Brea City Hall Council Chambers (1) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re subordination agreement with C-W Associates in connection with Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-114-2, approving and authorizing execution of a subordination agreement with C-W Associates relating to a Deed of Trust executed by C-W Associates re Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "J" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page S) _4- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second -Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, authorizing an addition of $2,160.00 for additional paving and traffic control adjustments to the contract with Colich & Sons, J.V. and granting a time extension of 153 calendar days for completion of said work See page ."K" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, 'authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $4,438.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons, J.V. See page (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-115-3, accepting Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, as complete, authorizing execution • of Notice of Completion and approving Final-Closeout Agreement See page "M" (p) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services �d re design of Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station. See page "N" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-116-3, approving agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services re design of Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station, for a lump sum fee of $28,500.00. See page 11011 (q) (1) - Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional engineering services in connection with design of the Orangethorpe I Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach: 15, to include design of Reaches 16 and 16A. See page "P" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-117-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 1S, for additional engineering services re design of Reaches 16 and 16A, authorizing an increase in the total compensation from $49,966.78 to $115,000.00; an increase in soils investigation service from $3,000.00 to $10,000.00; and an increase in surveying services from $4,000.60 to $25,000.00. See page (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page. 6) (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page S) DISTRICT 5 (r) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated.,See with . Clifford A. Forkert for design of Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. See page "R" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-118-5, approving agreement with Clifford A. Forkert for engineering services re design of Replacement of Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $23,000. See page "S" DISTRICT 6 (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff, the Statement of Preparation' of Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 (Wallace Neighborhood Strategy Area) in the . vicinity of Nineteenth Street and Placentia Avenue and Preliminary Plan for- said area received from the Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency DISTRICT 11 (t) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 & 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, .announcing a pre-bid conference to be held on July 25; and Addendum No. 2 to- said plans and *spec :fications for Contract No. 11-13-2, indicating revised Federal requirements, changing the bid date from August 7 to August 9, 1979, making miscellaneous technical clarifications and including the Cal-Trans permit and RWQCB dewatering permit . (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee- to negotiate with Butier Engineering, Inc. for consulting engineering services in connection with construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2 END OF CONSENT''CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent ealendar, if any -6- (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (13) ALL DISTRICTS ~ Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Staff report on proposed fiscal year 1979-80 .budgets (b) DISTRICT 1 ROLL CALL VOTE•,,,,,-.-.. Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80* fiscal year budget (c) DISTRICT 2 ROLL CALL VOTE....-...---A Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (d) DISTRICT 3 ROLL CALL VOTE.........- — Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (e) DISTRICT 5 ROIL CALL VOTIE., Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year .budget {f) DISTRICT 6 •Bolt CALL vOTI=,,,,,,-,,,„_ Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal. year budget ROLL CALL VOTE.,..,.,,,,--- (g) DISTRICT 7 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget ROLL CALL VOTE,,,,. .,..... (h) DISTRICT 11 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (14) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal staff report re status of construction grant for Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job -No. P2-25 (15) ALL DISTRICTS • Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors of County Roll Call Vote or Cast Sanitation District No. 1 on July 25, 1979, adopting Resolution No. 79-106, Unanimous Ballot amending amendment to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25. See page t'Tt' (16) ALL DISTRICTS Formal protest by H. C. Smith Construction Company of Chief Engineer's ruling on painting of insulated pipe for Job No. P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2.: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file formal protest by H. C. Smith Construction Company dated. Jtine 27, 1979. See page "U" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re said protest. See page "y" (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re said protest.. See page „wit (d) Consideration of action to either sustain the Chief Engineer'.s denial of (CU,�.%' -- said protest or rule in favor- of the contractor's protest and authorize a change order to the contract in the amount of $12,570.00 c,*�c , /',- -7- (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17-a) Consideration of action re Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R: � (No bids received at bid opening on 8/2/79. Therefore, staff recommends the following action.) ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Consideration of motion authorizing the General ?tanager to negotiate a contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, for consideration by the Boards at the regular September meeting. (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 n Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 _ Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for ITEMS ON Damages for Temporary Impairment of Access Based On Inverse Condemnation SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA and Nuisance, Case No. 31-79-65, Erwin Hinden and Christa Hinden dba Bill's Coffee Shop vs: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al., relative to the Knott Interceptor, Portion of Peach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and refer to contractor, General Counsel and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (23) DISTRICT 3 ' Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn D (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 6 C, Consideration of motion to adjourn j (28) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Q Consideration of motion to adjourn 0 T1 (30) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30-a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and ITEMS ON specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2, Portion of Newland SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, making technical clarifications and indicating required compliance with NPDES Permit re monitoring program (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn _A_ , BOARDS OF DIRECTORS r. County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,. Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 ARDS 540-2910 0 J INT B0962 2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE AUGUST 8, 1979 - 7:30 PA ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT / :00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, •if necessary (4) DISTRICT 3 ' Election of Chairman pro tem (5) Recognition of special guests (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda (7) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the •following meetings, as mailed: District 1 - July 11, 1979, regular, July 25, 1979, special and July 2S, 1979, adjourned special District 2 - July 11, 1979, regular District. 3 - July 11, 1979, regular District S - July 11, 1979, regular ' District 6 - July 11, 1979, regular District .7 - July 11, 1979, regular District 11 - July 11, 1979, regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (9)- ALL DISTRICTS , Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of • the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be• called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a •desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - See page "A" Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - See page "A" DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 3 - See page "B" DISTRICT NO. 5 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 _ NONE ' DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENCE See page "B" DISTRICT NO.• 7 _ See page "B" DISTRICT NO. 11 - NONE (10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS.IO (A) THROUGHIO (U ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are .considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the - consent calendar shall, upon recognition -by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. ' ' Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. r (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration. of motion to receive,'file and deny claim of General Telephone Company of California, dated July 11, 1979, in the amount of $150.66, for alleged damages to telephone cable in connection with construction of Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, and refer to the contractor and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the Districts' Superintendent to attend the Water Pollution Control Federation's 52nd Annual Conference in Houston, Texas, on October 7-10, . 1979; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred therefor (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-110, approving plans and specifications for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "C" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-111, approving plans and • specifications to Rebuild Two Climax Gas Engines _ and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "D" (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase order for replacement of worn gears on blower drive units for 46-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-16, for an amount not to exceed $15,000 (f) Consideration- of Resolution No. 79-108, approving Amendment .No. 2 to Amended Agreement re Sludge Hauling and Disposal with Golden West Fertilizer Company in connection with Specification No. 5-017, authorizing payment for standby time in the event the contractor is delayed by the Districts' at the Treatment Plant for a period in excess of one and one-half hours before hauling material to the Coyote Canyon Landfill Site, and authorizing a charge against the contractor for delays caused by the contractor in excess of one and one-half hours. See page "E" (g) Consideration of motion approving the Sale of Approximately 10,000 Cubic Yards of Dewatered Semi-Composted Digested Sludge, pursuant to Specification No. S-023, to Kellogg Supply Company, for the total amount of $1,000.00, and authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement for said sale (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fees for Butier Engineering, Inc. for additional construction management services in connection with 7S-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 7S-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24 • See page "F" . (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-107, approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with Butier .Engineering, Inc. for construction management services in connection with 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include additional construction management services for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job- No. P2-24, establishing classifications and per diem rates for said construction management services and authorizing an increase in extra professional services from $3S,000 to $60,000; total combined compensation for Jobs P2-23 and P2-24 not to exceed the previously authorized maximum of $510,000. See page "G" (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-109, amending Positions and Sa'aries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, reclassifying certain positions. See page "H" DISTRICT 2 (j) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-113-2, ordering annexation of 165.676 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff, the- Amendment to Plan, Brea Redevelopment Agency Project, Area C, and Notice of Public Hearing on Amendment to be held at 6:00 p.m. , on August 21, 1979, at •the Brea City Hall Council Chambers (1) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re subordination agreement with C-W Associates in connection with Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-114-2, approving and authorizing execution of a subordination agreement with C-W Associates relating to a Deed of Trust executed by C-W Associates re Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page 11J11 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) - DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, authorizing an addition of $2,160.00 for additional paving and traffic control adjustments to the contract with Colich & Sons, J.V. and granting a time extension of 153 calendar days for completion of said work See page "K" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $4,438.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons, J.V. See page (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-115-3, accepting Westside Interceptor Facility, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement See page "M" (p) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services re design of Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station. See page "N" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-116-3, approving agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services re design of Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station, for a lump sum fee of $28.,500.00. See page 110" Cq) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional engineering services in connection with design of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach: 15, to include design of Reaches 16 and 16A. See page "P" - (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-117-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, for additional engineering services re design of Reaches 16 and 16A, authorizing an increase in the total compensation from $49,966.78 to $115,000.00; an increase in soils investigation service from $3,000.00 to $10,000.00; and an increase in surveying services from $4,000.00 to $25,000.00. See page "Q" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) r (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page S) DISTRICT S (r) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Clifford A. Forkert for design of Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. See page "R" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-118-S, approving agreement with Clifford A. Forkert for engineering services re design of Replacement of Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, for a lump sum fee of $23,000. See page "S" • DISTRICT 6 . (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and refer to staff, the Statement of Preparation of Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 (Wallace Neighborhood Strategy Area) in the vicinity of Nineteenth Street and Placentia- Avenue and Preliminary • Plan for- said area received from the Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency DISTRICT 11 (t) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Coast Highway Trunk-Sewer, Reach 1 & •2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, announcing a pre-bid conference to be held on July 25; and Addendum No. 2 to said plans and specifications for Contract No. 11-13-2, indicating revised federal requirements, changing the bid date from August 7 to August 9, 1979, making miscellaneous technical clarifications and including the Cal-Trans permit and RWCQB dewatering permit (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Butier Engineering, Inc. for consulting engineering. services in connection with construction of the Coast Trunk • Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- � ! y 1 � j (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Execut ,ve Committee: (a) Staff report on proposed fiscal year 1979-80 budgets (b) DISTRICT 1 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (c) DISTRICT 2 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (d) DISTRICT 3 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (e) DISTRICT 5 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (f) DISTRICT 6 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal. year budget (g) DISTRICT 7 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (h) DISTRICT 11 Roll call vote motion approving 1979-80 fiscal year budget (14) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal staff report re status of construction grant for Flow Equalization- Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job -No. P2-25 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l on July 25, 1979, adopting Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. .P2-25. See page t'T" (16) ALL DISTRICTS Formal protest by H. C. Smith Construction Company of Chief Engineer's ruling on painting of insulated pipe for Job No. P2-23-6, Major Facilities for 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2: (a} Consideration of motion to receive and file formal protest by H. C. Smith Construction Company dated June 27, 1979. See page "u" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re said protest. See page "V" (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re said protest. See page 11W1+ (d) Consideration of action to either sustain the Chief Engineer's denial of said protest or rule in favor of the contractor's protest and authorize a change order to the contract in the amount of $12,570.00 -7- (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-112, to receive and file bidj tabulation and recommendation and awarding- Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. .J-13-2R, to in the amount of $ (See supplemental agenda - Bid opening 8/2/79) (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20). DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (2 1) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 25 DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any • (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- .BOARDS OF DIRECTOnS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 -JOINT BOARDS Telephon 714 es: JOI1 \ 1 BOAR S Area 9e11 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS AUGUST 8, 1979 - 7 : 30 P ,M, ALL DISTRICTS (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) Entity District(s) Active Alternate Board of 1 $ 6 Philip L. Anthony Thomas F. Riley Supervisors 2 $ 7 Edison W. Miller Philip L. Anthony 3 $ 11 Harriett M. Wieder Philip L. Anthony 5 Thomas F. Riley Philip L. Anthony Midway City Sanitary Dist. 3 Bruce D. Finlayson Conner L. Collacott City of Tustin 7 Ralph Welsh, Jr. Steven Schuster* (17-a) Consideration of action re Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R. (No bids received at bid opening on 8/2/79. Therefore, staff recommends the following action.) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate a contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2R, for consideration by the Boards at the regular September meeting. DISTRICT 3 (22-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages for Temporary Impairment of Access Based On Inverse Condemnation and Nuisance, Case No. 31-79-65, Erwin Hinden and Christa Hinden dba Bill's Coffee Shop vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al. , relative to the Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and refer to contractor, General Counsel and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 11 L (30-a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Coast Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 and 2, Portion of Newland Street Interceptor Sewer and Lake Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2, making technical clarifications and indicating required compliance with NPDES Permit re monitoring program U MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Box 8127 'County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, talif., 92708 Telephones: Areo Code 714 JOINT BOARS 9622411 Regular Meeting August 8 , 1979 - 7 :30 p .m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since, the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer' s estimate. . Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. Joint Boards No. 10-b - Authorizing Attendance at WPCF Conference in October. The staff is requesting authorization for the Districts ' Superintendent, William Clarke, to attend the WPCF Conference in Houston, Texas in October. Mr. Clarke submitted a paper entitled "Digester Sludge Dewatering - Experiences at Orange County, California, " which is to be presented during the conference. Attendance will provide an excellent opportunity for him to see the latest water pollution control equipment as well as participating in the technical sessions . No. 10-c - Approving Plans and S ecifications for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at. Coyote Canyon S u ge Processing Site . As part of the Districts ' solids processing and disposal program being conducted at the Coyote Canyon Landfill site, a wet-weather contingency plan has been developed. The contingency plan includes the construction of a paved all-weather road and two plastic lined two-acre sump areas where digested dewatered sludge can be deposited u - _ 3 during wet weather periods . After cessation of the rains , the material can be removed and processed or recycled for disposal. Facilities are also included in the plans for removal of excess water in order to comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and State Solid Waste Board permit requirements . It is proposed that bids for this work will be received and presented to the Boards for their consideration at the September meeting . Construction should start by the first of October in order that the facilities can be completed prior to this upcoming rainy season. The staff recommends approval of the. plans and specifi- cations . No. 10-d - Approval of Plans and Sp ecifications for Rebuilding Two Outfall Booster Engines of Use at P ant No . I Headworks . The Districts are in the process of replacing three of the four existing V-12 digester gas powered engines at the Rothrock Ocean Outfall Booster Station. These engines were initially installed in the 1959-60 era and replacement is required because of increased pumping requirements . It is planned that two of these V-12 engines will be refur- bished and installed at the Headworks at Plant No . 1 , providing additional power and increased pumping capacity at Plant No. 1 . Plans and specifications have been prepared by the Districts ' staff and approval is recommended. No . 10-e - Replacement of Gears on Secondary Treatment Blower Drive Unit. The gears on one of the digester gas blower drive units of the Plant No . 1 secondary treatment facilities are wearing and could fail any time. These gears were manufactured by the Western Gear Company and therefore are a proprietary item. It is requested that the staff be authorized to negotiate and award a Purchase Order for replace- ment of the worn gears to the Western Gear Company. The warranty period for these gears expired January, 1979 ; however, we will be pressing this company for a credit if it can be determined that the alignment caused the excessive wear on the gears or that they were defective . . No. 10-f - Sludge Hauling Standby Charges. The staff is recommending an amendment to the agreement with Goldenwest Fertilizer for standby time in the event that the trucking contractor is delayed for a period in excess of 12 hours at the treat- ment plants before hauling material to the Coyote Canyon Landfill site. Likewise, in the event the contractor delays the Districts ' dewater ing operation in excess of 12 hours , the Districts will charge the -2- �./ contractor at the same standby rate. The standby time charges ($35. 00/hour) are standard for rental of similar equipment. No. 10-g - Disposal of Stockpiled Composted Sludge at Plant No. 1. Prior to relocating the composting and drying operations to the Coyote Canyon Landfill site, the Districts processed digested dewatered sludge at a ten-acre site located at Plant No . 1. The material processed at Plant No. 1 has been stock-piled and should be removed prior to the rainy season as the site needs to be avail- able as a part of the Districts ' wet weather contingency plan for the processing of our solids in the event the Coyote Canyon Site cannot be used. The stock-piled material at the ten-acre site, if transported to the landfill for disposal , would cost the District $35 ,000. The Kellogg Company has offered to purchase the dried material at Plant No. 1 for $1, 000 and remove it at their own expense after further processing. The Company has agreed to compost any sludge we may deposit on the site during the period they are processing the estimated . 10, 000 yards of stockpiled sludge. No. 10-h - Addendum No . 2 to Construction Management Engineer- ing Services with Butler Engineering , Inc . Pursuant to the Boards ' authorization, the Selection Committee met with Butier Engineering, Inc. , on Monday, July 30th to discuss an amendment to the May, 1977 contract to include construction management services for two additional contracts to be constructed concurrently with the 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 . Presently, Butier Engineering is providing construction management engineering services for $38 million worth of work under construction at Plant No. 2 . Two additional projects , Solids Handling and Digestion Facilities , along with Flow Equalization and Hydraulic Reliability Facilities , estimated at $23 million will be constructed simultaneously. The Selection Committee recommends adjustment in the per diem rates and the addition of other classifications to Butier Engineering to assist the Districts ' staff in the supervision and inspection of these contracts . It is estimated at this time that even with this adjustment in scope and rates to Butier Engineering, Inc. , that the total compensation of $510, 000 authorized will not be exceeded. -3- . No. 10-i - Reclassification of Certain Positions . During, the past several months , the Districts ' staff has been meeting and conferring with the laboratory group and the electrical division on job reclassifications as provided in the Memoranda of Understanding which were effective December, 1978 . In the case of the electrical division, the staff is recommending a two-range increase (11'/) for the electrical foreman, a lk range increase for the electrical leadman (8 . 25%) and a 1-1/8 range increase for the electrical technicial II (Journeyman) (6 . 2%) , and no increases for the other classifications in the electrical division. We recommend that the effective date of the. reclassi- fication of the electrical division be made effective August loth. The meet-and-confer sessions with the laboratory personnel have not been concluded; however, we expect to have a recommenda- tion for the Board next Wednesday evening. In March, the Boards declared their intent to make any salary adjustments due, to re- classification" for laboratory personnel retroactive to March 9th. In addition to the above-mentioned reclassifications , the staff is requesting that a Builder III classification ($1180/1470) be added and a Builder I classification be deleted to permit the pro- motion of a Builder II to the Journeyman level. In June, a Builder III position was traded for an Equipment Operator III position with the intent that the employee in the Builder III position would transfer to the equipment operator position. However, this transfer did not take place . The requested action will permit the promotion of a well-qualified individual who is presently serving in the capacity of a Builder II. District No. 2 No. - 10-j - Ordering Annexation No. 34. The Local Agency Formation Commission has approved the Board' s request to annex this 165 , 676 acre parcel in the City of Yorba Linda approximately one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive. The proponents have paid all the fees on this annexation for the development of 341 single-family units which is in conformity with the District' s Master Plan. The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 79-113-2 ordering this annexation. No . 10-1 - Approving Subordination Agreement with C-W Associates . Last year, the Board approved an agreement with the Bryant Ranch owners for the annexation of 3 , 524 acres to District No . 2. -4- The agreement provides for the payment of the annexation fees of $2. 5 million with interest over a five-year period. This agree- ment is secured with a Trust Deed on the property. C-W Associates have requested the approval of a subordination agreement in order that they can secure bank financing for development. The General Counsel has reviewed the subordination request and he recommends that the Boards approve it as , in his opinion, the District has adequate security for the funds due, District No . 3 No. 10-m-n - Change Orders Nos . 2 and 3 to Contract No. 3-13-1. Change Order No . 2 to the second unit of the Westminster Avenue Force Main is for additional paving required and traffic control adjustments ($2, 160) necessary during the construction of this project, as well as a time extension of 153 calendar days for additional work, inclement weather and delays in getting pipe from the manufacturer. Change Order No . 3 is an adjustment of the engineer' s quantities ($4,438) . The staff recommends approval of these change orders . It should be noted that this contract, in the amount of $1, 272, 938, had total change orders representing one-half of one percent of the original contract amount. No. 10-o - Acceptance of Contract No. 3-13-1. Colich & Sons , the contractors on the second unit of the Westminster Avenue Force Main, have completed all of the work and have complied with the contract requirements for this project. The restoration of the public right of way has been done to the satisfaction of the Cities of Seal Beach and Westminster. The staff recommends acceptance of this project and the filing of a Notice of Completion as required. No. 10-p - Engineering Services for Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station. Pursuant to the Board' s direction, Chairman Henry Frese , acting for the Selection Committee , met with representatives from Boyle Engineering and District staff to negotiate engineering fees for the Additions to the Seal Beach Boulevard Pump •Station. When the station was originally constructed in 1971 , only four of the eight pumps were installed. Engineering services requested were for the design for the installation of the four additional pumping units , modifi- cations to the stairway and connections to the recently-completed Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit . Estimated construction cost for these facilities is $300, 000 . A negotiated fee of $28 , 500 was agreed upon for the engineering services . The Selection Committee recommends the approval of Boyle Engineering, Inc. , proposal and the �./ fees negotiated. -5- j No. 10-q - Engineering Services for Oran ethor a Relief Trunk Sewer, Western Avenue to Brookhurst Street, Reaches an A. In September, 1977 the Board approved an agreement with Boyle Engineering to prepare a preliminary engineering report for the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, extending from Knott ovenue to Brookhurst Street and the preparation of construction drawings for that portion from Knott Avenue to Western Avenue. The Cities of Buena Park and Fullerton are desirous for the District to complete the portion of the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer from Western Avenue to Brookhurst Street in order that they may begin major street improvements to Orangethorpe. Construction cost for the remaining portions of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer is estimated at $2. 6 million. Based on the work to be performed, it is estimated that the engineering services would be approximately $78,000. There remains an unused balance of approximately $13,000 of the original allocation made in September, 1977. It is , therefore, the recommendation of the Selection Com- mittee to amend the 1977 contract with Boyle Engineering, Inc . , to prepare the construction plans and specifications for Reaches 16 and 16A for an increase of an amount not to exceed $65 ,000. District No. 5 No. 10-r - En ineerin Services for Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trun Sewer. On Monday, July 23rd, the Coastal Commission approved a permit to replace approximately 3100 feet of 10-inch sewer pipe in Bayside Drive. In order to expedite this project, a request for proposals was sent to three engineering firms. The District Chairman, acting .on behalf of the Selection Committee, met with the staff on Monday, July 30th, to review the proposals submitted. The Selection Com- mittee recommends approval of the proposal submitted by Clifford Forkert, in an amount not to exceed $23 ,000. District No. ll No. 10-t - Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to Contract No. 11-13-2. These addenda were issued in connection with the Coast Highway Trunk Sewer. Addendum No . 1 was the announcement for a pre-bid conference held on July 25th. Addendum No . 2 included revised and updated federal requirements , reestablishment of the bid date from August 7th to August 9th and contained certain technical clarifi- cations along with the Cal-Trans permit and the dewatering permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The staff recom- mends approval of these addenda. -6- No. 10-u - AuthorizineSelection Committee to Negotiate Contract with Butier En inerin re• Construction ot Coast Highway Tr—unk Sewer. The Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, extending from Plant No. 1 along the beach side of Pacific Coast Highway to Lake Street includes five tunnels crossing the Pacific Coast Highway, the D-2 Flood Control Channel and the outfall lines of the Southern California Edison power generation plant . To assist the staff in the supervision and inspection of this project, it is recommended that Mark Butier of Butier Engineering, Inc. , be retained on a consulting basis as he is a recognized expert in tunnel construction. Since the Coast Highway Trunk is a grant-funded project, consulting fees during construction will be grant eligible. The staff is requesting that the Selection Committee meet with Mark Butier to negotiate the contract and present it to the Board for considera- tion. Joint Boards Nos. 12 and 13 - Report of the Executive Committee. The Committee met on July 25th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . No. 15 - Ratifying Action Amending .Amendment to Negative Declaration. On July 25th, the District No. 1 Board met at the request of the staff to amend the recent amendment to the negative declara- tion for the 75 mgd Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 for the purpose of clarifying the project to be in concert with the determinations under consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board and the EPA staffs . The action appearing on Wednesday' s agenda is to ratify the action of the District No. 1 Board in adopt- ing Resolution No. 79-106, acting for itself and Districts 2, 3, 5 , 6, 7, and 11. No. 16 - Protest of Engineering' s Ruling. Enclosed with your agenda material is a protest of the Districts ' Chief Engineer' s ruling regarding the interpretation of the specifications on Job No. P2-23-6. The contractor is not in agreement with the Engineer' s ruling and has requested the determination by the Boards of Directors pursuant to Section 8-4 of the Districts ' Standard Specifications . The subcontractor' s protest is a claim for an additional $12,570 to perform the "disputed work" . Since this is a federal grant project, the staff is not making a recommendation but is presenting the facts of the protest to the Directors for their decision. -7- *4000 No. 17 - Award of Contract for Warehouse Office Expansion. Public bids will be received on August 2nd for the expansion of the Districts ' warehouse office. If the low bid is satisfactory, the staff will be recommending award of the contract at Wednesday' s meeting. A bid tabulation and recommendation will appear on the supplemental agenda. The engineer's estimate is $175 ,000. Fred A. Harper General Manager L - RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING.-DOCUMENTS, AUGUST 8, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 030 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 46482 Air California, Air Fare. • • $ 148.00 46483 Artesia Implements $ Parts Co., Truck Parts 74.40 46484 Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Technical Tour 1,395.00 46485 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies 1,401.11 46486 • Authorized Supply Corp. , Small Tools 208.92 46487 Bank Americard, Meeting Expenses 41.65 . 46488 Banning Battery Co., Truck Batteries 197.80 46489 Benz Engineering, Inc., Compressor Parts 398.99 46490 James Benzie, Employee Mileage 76.68 46491 Bierly $ Associates, Inc., Self-Insurance Program 900.00 46492 Bird Machine, Engine Parts 194.72 46493• Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-Employment Physicals 13.00 46494 W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage 33.90 46495 E.D. Bullard Co. , Safety Supplies 23.64 46496 State of California, Sales Tax 325.98 46497 California Auto Collision, Inc. , Truck Repair 271.79 46498 Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil Spill 362.72 • 46499 Chevron U.S.A. , Inc., Gasoline 32682.65 46500 R.B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls 107.51 46501 Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premiums 2,117.00 46502• College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber 41.55 46503 Compressor & Industrial Engine, Compressor Parts 10234.81 '46564' Consolidated Electrical Dist. , Electrical Supplies 110.24 46505 Continental- Radiator, Truck Repair •. 108.50 '6506 Continental Chemical Co. , Chlorine 63572.00 4i6507 Controlco, Controls 91.22 46508 Control Specialists, Inc. , Controls 110.03 46569' Costa Mesa_ Auto Parts, Inc. , Truck Parts 104.25 46510 County of Orange, Pre-Employment Physicals. 3,183.25 46511 County 'Sanitation Dist.. of Orange County, Rep1.. .Workers! Comp. 1,231.18 46512 I1r. Crane, Crane Rental 729.50 46513 Larry Curti Truck $ Equipment, Equipment Rental 12946.66 46514 Daniels Tire Service, Truck Tires 723.11 46515 Deco, Electrical Supplies 631.76 46516 DeGuelle & Sons Glass. Co., Glass 2S.lS 46517 George DeMatteo, Employee Mileage 24.66 46518 Derbys Topsoil, Gravel 381.60 46519 Direct• Safety Co., Freight 2.85 46520 Dooley & Co. Lumber, Lumber 873.00 46521 Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supplies 161.04 46522 Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies 259.08 46523 Enchanter, Inc. , Ocean Monitoring 3,000.00 46524 Escondido Machinery Co. , Tractor Parts 603.56 46525 Federal Envelope Co. , Envelopes 187.23 46526 Flo-Systems, Pump Parts 457.50 46527 Foothill Feed Co. , Truck Parts 171.99 46528 City of Fountain Valley, Water 1,090.•37 46529 Fountain Valley Lock & Safe, Door Lock 82.33 46530 France Compressor Products, Engine Parts 445.20 �,16531 Gatlin Home Sprinkler Supply, Landscape Supplies 27.98 46532 General Telephone Co. , Telephone 41043.63 -46533 Georgia Pacific, Lumber 922.62 46534 Golden State Fish Hatchery, Lab Supplies 30.00 "AALL1" AGENDA ITEM #`9 DISTRICTS. "�-1" t . JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY •03, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 46535 Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Sludge Hauling $ 259853.75 46536 Gould, Inc.-Warren £ Baily Division, Electrical Supplies 24.44 46537 Hach Chemical Co. , Inc. , Lab Supplies 61.94 46538 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Auto Leasing 819.23 46539 ' Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires 106.67 46540 Howard Supply Co., Hose Nozzle 13.36 46541 Industrial Clutch Corp. , Freight 38.60 46542 Janice Johnson, Employee Mileage 11.25 46543 Karlee Co. , Paint Supplies 262.37 46544 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co. , Plumbing Parts 498.73 4654S King Bearing, Inc. , Bearing Supplies 102.10 46546 Kleen-Line Corp., Paper Products 87.77 46547 Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools 230.68 46548 L.A. .Chemical, Landscape Supplies 424.00 46549 L.B•W.S. , Inc., Welding Supplies 331.82 46550 LFE Environmental Labs, Lab Analysis 10.00 46551- Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc. , Concrete Blocks 11209.88 46552 Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing 11.03 . 46553 Leonards Carpet Service, Carpet Installation 351.45 46554 Lewco Electric Co. , Electrical Supplies 92.19 46555 Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies- 152.03 ' •46SS6• Midway Tool & Supply, Small Tools 84.99 46557 Morgan Equipment Co. , Gauges 19.83 '46558 National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware 191.65 46559 Nelson-Dunn, Inc. , Engine Parts ?.06 46560 City of Newport Beach, Water 11.70 46561- Ocean Salt Co. , Inc. , Water Softener 352.54 46562 -Orange County Water District, Water Production Tax 41,692.00 46563 Parker -Supply Co. , Chemicals 37.23 46564 M.C. Patten- Corp. , Electrical Supplies 609.52 46565 Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Hedge Trimmer Repair 17.65 46566 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. , Professional Services 12,582.74 46567 Phillips Engine & Equipment Co. , Engine Parts 21198.12 46568 Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies 740.72 46569 Postmaster, Postage 13000.00 46570 Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice 18.00 • 46571 Rainbow- Disposal Co. , Trash Disposal 107.10 46572 Dennis M. Reid, P2-24, P2-251 11-13-2 Travel Expenses 37.40 46573 Relief. Printing Co. , Business Cards 66.78 46574 Rewes Engineering Co., Manhole Rehabilitation 20,631.75 46575 Eddie Rios, Ceiling Repair 1SS.00 .... . 46576 City of Seal Beach, Water 13.20 46577 Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Small Tools SSO.62 46578 Shamrock Supply, Small Tools 284.29 46579 Sherwin Williams Co. , Paint Supplies 337.63 46580 Sims Industrial Supply, Safety Supplies 31.27 46581 South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies 90.96 46582 Southern Calif. Edison Co. , Power 109782.99 46583 Southern Calif. Gas Co. , Natural Gas 13,270.82 r 46584 Southwest Sewer Equipment, Truck Parts .95.45 46585 Starow Steel, Steel Stock 676.71 465.8.6 Sterling Power Systems, Inc. , Engine.Parts 18.93 "A-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 - ALL DISTRICTS • "A-211 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 03, 1979 "IARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS • AMOUNT 46587 Super Chem Corp., Janitorial Supplies $ 266.33 46588 The Supplicrs, Safety Supplies 487.71 46589 J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash 182.74 46590 Tarby Engineering, Pump Parts 180.31 46591 ' . Taylor-Dunn, Electric Cart Parts 110.94. 46592 Transamerica-Delaval, Inc., Controls 77.92 46593 Travel Buffs, Air Fare 388.00 46594 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. , Truck Parts 469.74 46595 Union Oil Co. of Calif. , Gasoline 31.77 46596 U.S. Rentals, Equipment Rental 134.00 46597 United Parcel Service, Delivery 10.46 46598' VBA Cryogenics, Specialty Gases 56.67 46599 Valley Cities Supply Co., Plumbing Parts 734.36 46600 Valvate Associates, Pipe Supply 46.49 46601 Vanier Graphics, Payroll Warrants 361.04 46602 VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies 304.35 46603 John R. Waples, Odor Consulting 219.30 46604 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts 957.48 46605 Westinghouse Supply Co. , Electrical Supplies 222.60 46606 Thomas L. Woodruff, Professional Services 33324.30 46607' Xerox Corp. , Xerox Reproduction 435.31 .• .46608. Mr. Zip's Kopy Center, Brochure Printing 324.52 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 1392317.59 "A-3" AGENDA ITEM #9 - ALL DISTRICTS ".'� . t l JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 03, 1979 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 46457 John A. Artukovich & Sons, Retention PTV-069 $ 22,900.20 46458 Butier Engineering, Inc. , Value Engr.• P2-23 and P2-24 13$ 50.50 46459 State of California, Sales Tax 687.80 46460 Campbell Heating & Air Conditioning,- Retention J-7-3B 6,421.80 46461 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering P2-24 103,444.58 46462 John Carollo Eng./Greeley Hansen, P2-23 Construction Engr• 162046.55 46463 Contacts Influential, Industry Directory 402.80 46464 Crown Fence & Supply Co. , Inc. , Contract PW-075 13,040.00 46465 Daily Pilot, Display Advertising 1,279.00 46466 Delphi Systems, Inc. , Computer Accessories 487.60 46467 Gauge Repair Service, Test Gauge 569.01 46468 Bob Johnson GMC, 1/2 Ton Pick-up Trucks 10,205.68 46469 M.P. Port-A-Built Co. , Trailer for Coyote Canyon 1,272.00 46470 Minicomputer Accessories, Data Cabinet 597.84 46471 James M. Montgomery, Engineering I-lR 925.00 46472 Motorola Communications, Inc. , Base Station 478.06 46473 County of Orange, Revenue Program Assessor Charges 4,122.12 46474 Pascal & Ludwig, Retention P2-23-5 2,750.00 46475 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. , Computer & Revenue. Program 40,502.70 46476 The Register, Display Advertising 3,332.52 46477' Southern Calif, Testing Lab, Testing P2-23=6. 62.49 .4647-8. Topaz Electronics,' Power Conditioners .11287.90 46479 Triad Mechanical, Inc., Contract I-1R 3,594.80 •46480 U.D.S.E.C. , Pipe Locator 404.40 46481 Utilities Supply Co., Storage Cabinet 269.97 TOTAL CORF $ 236,435.32 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 37S,752.91 I'A-4f' AGENDA- ITEM #9 - ALL DISTRICTS • r ' INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 03, 1979 DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF, . AMOUNT 464SO Smith-Emery Co. , Testing 03-20-4 $. 560.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 $ .560.00 DISTRICT NO. 5&6 SUSPENSE;:FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF MOUNT 46451 Clifford A. Forkert, Survey 5-21 $ 1,116.00 46452 L.U. King Engineers, Design Engineering 5-2 6,800.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5&6 $ 7,916.00 • DISTRICT NO. 7 FIXED OBLIGATION FUND. WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 46453 City of Anaheim, JOS Oil Royalty $ 543.83 46454. City of Fullerton, JOS Oil Royalty 543.83 46455 City of Orange, JOS Oil Royalty 543.83 4C5456 City of Santa Ana, JOS Oil Royalty 543.84 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 $ 2,175.33 "B" AGENDA- ITEM #,'9 - ALL DISTRICTS "B" a RESOLUTION NO. 79-110 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PTV-069-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2232 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WET IVEATHER CONTINGENCY PLAN AT COYOTE CANYON SLUDGE PROCESSING SITE, .JOB NO. PIV-069-1 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of ,Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer, for Wet Weather Contingency Plan at Coyote Canyon Sludge Processing Site, Job No. PW-069-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, L,.d Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to adver- tise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. "C" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" RESOLUTION NO. 79-111 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO REBUILD TWO CLIMAX GAS ENGINES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 3, S, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORAINGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS TO REBUILD TWO CLIMAX GAS ENGINES The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer, to REBUILD TWO CLIMAX GAS ENGINES, are hereby approved and adopted; .and, �. Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to adver- tise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, . Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer .be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. "D" AGENDA ITEM #10(D) -- ALL DISTRICTS. 11D11 RESOLUTION NO. 79-108 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO.2 TO AMENDED AGREEMENT RE SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL WITH GOLDEN WEST FERTILIZER COMPANY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 31 52 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AGREEMENT RE SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-0171 WITH GOLDEN WEST FERTILIZER COMPANY WHEREAS, on May 10, 1978, County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 32 S. 6, 7 and 11, entered into an amended agreement with Golden West Fertilizer Company for sludge hauling and disposal, which said agreement has been amended from time to time as deemed appropriate by these Boards of Directors, and, WHEREAS, it -is now deemed desirable to further amend said agreement to provide for payments to and charges against the contractor for standby time. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: ' Section 1. That Amendment No. 2 dated , to that certain amended agreement dated May 10, 1978, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, -acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, and Golden West Fertilizer Company for standby time, in the event the contractor is delayed at the treatment plant by the Districts before hauling material to the Coyote Canyon Landfill Site and authorizing a charge against the. contractor for delays caused by the contractor, is hereby approved , and adopted•, and, Section 2. That the standby rate is hereby established at $35,00 per hour to be paid or charged to the closest one-tenth C1/10) of an hour in accordance with the following: "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Payment to Contractor by Districts - Standby time shall be paid by Districts to contractor for delays caused by the Districts in excess of one and one-half (1h) hours per truckload. Charge by Districts to Contractor - Standby time shall be charged by Districts to contractor for delays caused by contractor in excess of one and one-half (1h) hours per truckload. Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment in form approved by .the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 9, 1979. "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-211 N{SAT11•A TIC LEPtiON CS: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ,�I,�.�;., AREA CCDE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ��;� 962-z 4>> P. 0. BOX 6127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9270E3 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIE GO FREEWAY) July 31, 1979 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708- - Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services for Job No. P2-24 (Solids Handling) at Plant No. 2 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for the selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated an amendment to that agreement for construction management engineering services, dated May 25, 1977, between the Districts and Butier Engineering, Inc. , in connection with construction of additional facilities to be constructed concurrently with the 75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. The Selection Committee hereby recommends an amendment to. said agreement as follows: 1. That the per diem rates along with the following classifications be effective from September 1, 1979 through June 30, 1980: Construction Manager $45.00 Chief Inspector 35.50 Construction Engineer 33.75 Mechanical and Electrical Inspector 23.50 Civil Inspector 21.00 Clerical 11.00 2. Extra professional services as specified in Article VII, Paragraph A be increased from $35,000 to $60,000. 3. The scope of work shall be modified to include .construction management services for Districts contract designated as 'P2-24, Solids Handling and Digestion. 4. The total compensation, as set forth in Article VII, Paragraph A-1, remains as set forth in the original agreement of May 25, 1977, as $510,000. "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 _ (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 21 3, 51 6, 7 and 11 July 31, 1979 Page Two The Selection Committee hereby certifies that the final negotiated fee for this recommended amendment is reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profit for the engineer. Donald L. Fox, Chairman Selection Committee Bill Vardoulis, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Approved: Fred A. Harper General Manager 7-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(H) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS 11F-211• . RESOLUTION NO. 79-107 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN- ISTRATION SERVICES RE JOB NO. P2-23 I=OR ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR JOB NO. P2-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 21 32 52 62 7 AND 11' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREENIENT WITH BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES RE 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREADIENT FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 22 JOB NO. P2-231 TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR SOLIDS HANDLING AND DEWATERING FACILI- TIES FOR 75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT -PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-24 WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. 'for construction contract administratiop services in connection with 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23; and, WHEREAS, the Districts propose to concurrently -construct additional facilities known as Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24, which said .construction will require contract admini- stration services; and, WHEREAS, it would be in the Districts' best interest to engage Butier Engineering, Inc. for said additional contract administration services to maximize the effectiveness of said services and the coordination of the extensive construc- tion program at Plant No. 2; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified fees with Butier Engineering, Inc. for said additional services, in accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, "G.-1" AGENDA ITEM .#10(H) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" r DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 2 dated to the Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. dated May 25, 1978, for construction contract admin- istration services relative to 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, to include additional construction management services for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-243 in the scope of the work, is hereby authorized" and approved; and, Section 2, That changes to contract provisions for fees for said construction contract administration services for Job No. P2-23 and P2-24 are hereby approved as follows: A. The following classifications and per diem rates are hereby established: Construction Manager $45.001hour Chief Inspector 35.50/hour Construction Engineer 33.75/hour Mechanical 4 Electrical Inspector 23.50/hour Civil Inspector 21.00/hour Clerical 11.00/hour and that said rates shall be in effect for the period September 1, 1979, through June 30, 1980, subject to change on July 1, 1980, and annually thereafter, upon mutual agreement. B. Extra professional services as specified in Article VII, Paragraph A be increased from $35,000 to $60,000. Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. .2, 3, 51 62 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held August 8, 1979. 11672" AGENDA ITEM -#10(H) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-21' ' RESOLUTION NO. 79-109 • r AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2; 33 52 6, ✓ 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby, further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust authorized personnel and/or salary ranges for position classifications therein, to reclassify one authorized Builder I to Builder III, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-5" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS • Approximate • Monthly Position Authorized Range Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary 20200 Builder III 2 • 1051E 6.81/8.48 1180/1470 20600 Builder I 0 1048D 5.74/7.15 995/1239 Section 2. That the changes set forth in Section 1 shall become effective August 10, 1979. Section 3. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust authorized personnel and/or salary ranges for position classifications therein, to reclassify salary ranges for the position classifications, as set forth below: "H- ." AGENDA ITEM #10 C t) - -ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" EXHIBIT "B-5" OPERATIONAL, AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary 60075 Electrical Foreman 1 1056G 9.08/11.31 1574/1960 60225 Lead Electrical Technician 2 1055E 8.48/10.56 1470/1830 60300 Electrical Technician II 5 1054E 8.03/10.00 1392/1733 Section 4. That the changes set forth in Section 3 shall become effect%ye August 10, 1979. Section 3. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust .authorized personnel and/or salary ranges for position classifications therein, to reclassify �••�' salary ranges for position classifications set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-4" LABORATORY POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary (Pending completion of negotiations with Laboratory Unit) Section 6. That, pursuant to action of the Boards of Directors at the regular joint meeting on Harch 14, 1979, the changes set forth in Section 5 shall become effective March 9, 1979. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #10 0) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2 MEMORAN'PLIM . To: Bard of Directors ' County Sanjtatlon 'District No. 2 From General Counsel l�atei :�a3y 31, 1979 :. Rer Requtest for Subordination Agreement ' Associal's1-r-a ' 1. RCI'! ' As the Directors w.1 recall, several nonths ago. the Bryant Ranch was sold to re!m ow-ners (C-V' Assa::lales), who ensared into wri agreerrtwnt u4th the gNst icy �r ?�' dine for the .'�.-4 L'CSc"3a Of C£:i�?;�i ann—exatios see G'wing to .-� ls'c ice#- ; ':: 3vtal c�:'2 unf owing was $2,25 ;9&S..00. T his CD-1- tign, in tsrcCr to Insure performance, ti-vats. Guaranteed, by the Lxec-Ution of a promissory note bra' C- W Associates in favor of the District, and further secured by Deed of Trust an • the N-Yant Ranch }aropc4-tY. t the +,L;me of the agreement and recording Of the deed of true:, we were aware and did approve the placement of our reed of trust its a se-ctxi i poslzlon behind the note and dead of «ust used by the owners/developers for the acquisition of the 10-nd. The land ac*.luWtfon loan was in the amount of $12,5:)0,00CQ � Pur:susnt to the terms of our*agreement, we have now been requested by the new• owners to execute a subordlnariom agreement whereby we wijl agree to place the 'e-xistling deed of .rust in favor of try District in a rosition teco�dary to the Bankof Montreal, who !s prepared to rn�Sce a $15,�`^0t000.UU loam to the developers. In exdianbe for this, it is agreed by the. ownerstde•velopers and the' existing acqui;it:on lender, that i>>r., origir.aS loan in the amount of $12,500*0 0.00 will be suboindinated by both the Bank of 1.3on1r4al and our Own note. The net effect is to confintic to ke-ep us In a second position, but behind a $15)000,DOO.1DD rather than -s $112,500l000.00 loan. Howe'Yer, it should be PoiTned out that the $i3,000tDO0.00 loan, according to the agreements which have been submitted to my office for revle\tt and approval, provides that $8,000,000.,00 of that is for she 11m3ted purpose of the deve-lopment of the Bryant' Ranch. Therefore, It is apparent ghat the Nstrict's Interest•vWU be protected, in view of the fact that that sum of mn".y w1II be used to Improve the pro,party with "I-T" AGENDA ITEM # 10(L) (1) DISTRICT 2 "I-1" Jul)' -A. residentiai and commcrciad structures, thereby enhancing the value by an amount signific r,;.y grester than that which gill he n-essary to secure our interest. AdditionLily, it should he Pointed out that the most recent appraisal of the property lists It at approximately $0,50,000.00, a;id therefore, any risk of the Dlstrict is viritually m existent. tt is recommended that the agreement be approved, subject t6 the following ccncitions: . •- I. �'tia: the existing need of `rust holdlrg pr lrnary 6ositlon in favor of CD inveCments, Inc., be either cancelled or subordlinated to a position lower in • priorlty to the District's mote and cited of trust. 2. That all documents be submitted to my office for review and approval. r. 'hat wi escro%y be- optried with irrevocable in."rvctions, whereby the t-ccordinv of the suborr:�inafion agreement and n-ev; nwes and e-eeds of trust b . tstablishNt dlt so as to insure sequential recoraing sri asp order that u'sll protect the DIstr1cfs In el-estr Thonjas L. Vroodruf f Genera. Counsel CM Mr. F.A. Harper MIT F/B ON-IS. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM ##10(L) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "I-2" r RESOLUTION NO. 7 9-114--2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 29 APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT— WITH C-W ASSOCIATES, RELATING TO A DEED OF • TRUST EXECUTED BY C-W ASSOCIATES (BRYANT RANCH) ANNEXATION NO. 35 WHEREAS, District made and entered into an annexation agreement dated March 5, 1979 with C-W Associates, owner/developer of Bryant Ranch, providing for deferral of-annexation fees over a period of five years; and, WHEREAS, to insure payment of said deferred annexation fees, the owner/developer executed a promissory note secured by deed of trust upon the annexed property; and, WHEREAS, C-W Associates has requested that District execute a subordi- nation agreement, wherein District approves of a new note and deed of trust being executed by C-W Associates in favor of a lender, the proceeds of which are to be used for development purposes; and, ' WHEREAS, District has determined that the terms of the subordination agreement are sufficient to guarantee protection of the District's interests. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That certain subordination agreement dated August 8, 1979, by and'between C-W Associates and County Sanitation District No. 2, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", is hereby approved. Section 2: That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign the agreement with C-W Associates, together with all other documents necessary to effect said trans- action, subject to the condition that that certain Deed of Trust to secure an 1 - . "J-1" AGENDA ITEM- #lOt�) C2) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1" indebtedness of C-W Associates to CD Investments (U.S.) Inc. in the amount of `•�' $12,500,000.00, recorded November 15, 1978, in Rook 12924, Page 143 of Official Records of Orange County, as Instrument No. 20437 be subordinated to the Deed of Trust of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this 8th day of August, 1979. "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(L) (-2) DISTRICT 2 "J--2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS' OF ORANGE COUNTY • P. O. ' BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS .AVENUE f ,. •FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT- NO,. N/A C.O. NO. 2 J CONTRACTOR: COLICH & SONS, -A JOINT- VENTURE DATE July 18, 1979 Westside Interceptor facilities, Westminster Avenue JOB: Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1 Amount of tk i s Change Order (ADD) D{}VTx $ 2,160.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD: 1. Additional temporary striping on Westminster Avenue to ease congestion caused by gas lines for service stations and construction $ 200.00 2. Remove broken asphalt adjacent to trench over Unit One Force Main. 1,003.00 3.. Slurry seal additional portions of Westminster • ' Avenue. $4.7.00 ' 4. Repair Manhole at Hammon Place. 110.00 TOTAL ADD: $2,160.00. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME - The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of ' contract time as follows: 1. For additional work, this change order: 20 Calendar Days 2. For delays in securing pipe from manufacturer: 102 Calendar Days 3. For inclement weather: 31 Calendar Days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 153 Calendar Days "K-�." AGENDA ITEM #10(M) - DISTRICT 3 "K-1" f • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O.- BOX 8127 - 10 844 L•L-L I S AVENUE ' FOUNTA114 VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 _ • • CHANGE . ORDER GRANT NO. N/A �..� C.O. NO, 2 CONTRACTOR' COLICH & SONS, A JOINT VENTURE DATE July 18, 1979 Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue JOB: Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME • i Original Contract Date August 24, 1978. Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February' 19, •197.9 Time Extension This Change Order .153 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 158 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 338 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date July 27, 1979 Original Contract Price $ 1,272,938.00. Prev: Auth: Changes $ 300.00 This Change (ADD) (D=U9K) '$ 2,160.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,275,398.00 Board authorization date: August 8, 1979 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, Ca) i Porn i a COLICH & SONS, A JOINT VENTURE © _ BY. Contractor Chief Engineer "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(M) - DISTRICT 3 "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY • P. 0.. BOX 8127 -- 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C.O.- NO. 3 SOW) CONTRACTOR : COLICH & SONS, A JOINT VENTURE DATE July 18, 1979 Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue JOB: Force Alain, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-1 -]_______ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) tRRI-I IJ $ 4s 438.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: ' Item Change Est'd Quantities No. Unit Description From To Diff. 1. L.F. 30" Force'Main 13,983 13,987 4 @ $82/L.F. $ 328.00 (a) Ton Asphalt, In-place 0 426- 426 @ $19/Ton 8,094.00 (b). Ton Base, ,In-place 0 102 102 @ $8/Ton 816.00 • _ Total Add: $9,238.00 DEDUCT: ' 6. Each Support Walls . 3 •0 .3 @ $600/Each $1,800.00 7. C.Y. Encasement Concrete 20 • 0 20 @ $150/C.Y. 31000..00 • Total Deduct: $41800.00• TOTAL ADD $4,438.00 • Original Contract Price• $ 1,272,938.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $• 2,460.00 • This Change (ADD) .(BKQUg'T) $ 4,438.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1#279,836.00 Board authorization date: August 8, 1979 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF COLICH & SONS, A-JOINT VENTURE Orange County, California By gy Contractor Chief Engineer "L" AGENDA ITEM •#10(N) - DISTRICT 3 "L" - RESOLUTION NO. 79-115-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1 .AS COIMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY-, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor,• Colich $ Sons J.V. , has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1; and, Section 2. That .by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineer , has recommended acceptanc•e ,of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. • That the Chief Engineer of the.District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Contract No. 3-13-1 is hereby accepted*as complete in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated August 24, 1978; and, Section 5. That the District's Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Colich *& Sons J.V. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Alain, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to. execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. .11M11 AGENDA ITEM #10(o) - DISTRICT 3 II-Mil ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS '� .;.� AREA CODC 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ;i 9 662.2a1 2 9�c T a•���. 1 P. 0. BOX 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 27, 1979 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Conjunction with Master Plan Improvements Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering service, the Selection Committee, as authorized by the District Board of Directors pursuant to minute order of June "13, 1979, has negotiated the following fee* with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in conjunction with master plan improvements for the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station: Lump Sum Fee: $28,500.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed, and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Henry R. Fr se, Chairman Selection Committee Approved /~� (" �'� _ <<-C -- Fred A. Harper General Manager "N" AGENDA ITEM410(P) (1) - DISTRICT 3 "N" RESOLUTION NO. 79-116-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF ADDITIONS TO SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD PUMPING STATION �. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF ADDITIONS TO SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD PUMPING STATION WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineer- ing and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Additions to.Seal Beach �.r✓ Boulevard Pumping Station- and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said pro- cedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said, services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOE$ HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER. Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and Boyle Engineering Corpora- tion for engineering services in connection with design of Additions to Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accord- ance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum fee of $28,500.00; and, AGENDA ITEM #10(P) (2) - DISTRICT 3 Q. Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. ] PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. 110-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(p) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "0-2" • _ SNIT♦T!� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS = +f.. AREA CODE TELEPHONES: OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-241 1 P. O. BOX 6127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 27, 1979 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Orangethorpe Relief 'Trunk Sewer Reaches 16 & 16A In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering service, the Selection Committee, as authorized by the District Board of Directors pursuant to minute order of July 11 , 1979, has negotiated �.d the following contract modification with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in conjunction with design engineering services for the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 16 & 16A: Modify that agreement for engineering services with Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated September,' 1977, . for the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk from $49,966.78 total compensation to $115,000 total compensation. 'Increase Soils investigation from $3,000 to $10,000. Increase Survey authorization from $4,000 to $25,000. The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed, and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the 'consultant. Henry R. Frese, Chairman Selection Committee Fred A. Harper r r General Manager "P" AGENDA ITEM #10(a) (1) - DISTRICT 3 UP11 RESOLUTION NO. 79-117-3 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING FOR DESIGN OF OP.A,NGEIHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEIVER, REACH 15 1-0 AD DESIGN OF RL•ACHI:S 16 AND 16A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. I TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING FOR DESIGN OF ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACH 15 TO ADD DESIGN OF REACHES 16 AND 16A WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in. connection with the design of Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Knott Avenue to Brookhurst Street and Knott Avenue to Western Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the Districts now propose to construct Reaches 16 and 16A of said Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer from Western Avenue to Brookhurst Street, which said project will require engineering design services; and, WHEREAS, it would be in the District's best interest to engage Boyle • Engineering Corporation for said additional engineering design services to maximize the effectiveness of said services and the coordination of the construction project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of 'the Board of Directors, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified fees with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional engineering services, in accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering and architec- tural services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 dated to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation dated September 14, 1977, for engineering design services relative to Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, to "Q- ." AGENDA ITEM #10(a) (2) = DISTRICT 3 "Q-l" add additional engineering design services for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk- Sewer, Reaches 16 and 16A, to the scope of work, is hereby authorized and approved; and, Section 2. That contract provisions for fees for said additional work be changed as follows: A. Subcontracted soils engineering as set forth in Paragraph 4. (B),be increased from $3,000 to $10,000. B. Field surveying as set forth in. Paragraph 4. (B) , be increased from $4,000 to $25,000. C. Total compensation, as set forth in Paragraph 4, (AA), be increased from $49,966.78 to $115,O00. Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held August 8, 1979. "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(Q) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "Q-2" TELCPHDNE i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS c1�J_-/Lf-`;'r AREA CODE 714 -540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �,�. ,� 962-2411 P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 31, 1979 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708' Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection ' with Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee, which was comprised of the Chairman of the District and the Districts' Chief Engineer, reviewed the proposals submit- ted by three professional engineering companies in connection with the engineering services for the design and replacement of a-portion of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. It is the recommendation of the Selection Committee that engineering services, for the project be awarded .to Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, in accordance with his proposal as follows: Preliminary Engineering Design Lump Sum $ 31000 Preparation of Plans and Specifications pursuant to District's requirements Lump Sum 20,000 Construction Survey Staking & Grade Sheets In accordance with per diem rates effective August 1, 1979 attached to engineer's proposal. of July 30th. The Selection Committee hereby certifies that the recommended fee is reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profit for the consultant. /s/ Paul Ryckoff Paul Ryckoff, Chairman Selection Committee Approved: /s/ Fred A. Harper „Rr, Fred A. Harper, General Manager AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (1) - DISTRICT 5 "R" RESOLUTION NO. 79-118-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CLIFFORD A. FORKERT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF REPLACEMENT OF A PORTION OF BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEIVL=R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF- ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CLIFFORD A. FORKERT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF REPLACEMENT OF A PORTION OF BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for` the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Clifford A. Forkert for design of Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services, which said certification has been approved by the General Manager, NOW,' THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District No. 5 and Clifford A. Forkert for engineering services in connection with design of Replacement of a Portion of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum fee of $23,000.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized '..� and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. "S" AGENDA ITEM #10(R) (2) -- DISTRICT 5 "S41 RESOLUTION NO. 79-106 AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JO13 NO. P2-23, 'I'0 INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25 - -- - -- -- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. l OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN BEHALF OF I-'SELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.' 21 3, 5, 63, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 7541GD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED, TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, in April. 1976, the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) .and as a result of said study, declared that an environmental impact statement was not required; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on-December 8, 1976, received, filed and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a .significant affect on the environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency, and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7- and 11 of Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, adopted Resolution No. 76-206, making a negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2723); and, WHEREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25) , and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been advised that the Environmental Protection Agency is to amend their April 8, 1976 finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 •� (Job No. P2-25); and, .n --1" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS nT-11' WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the environment and has concluded that said project would not have a significant affect on the environment and, therefore, the .Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. (Job No. P2-25), pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS,' the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 52 61 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on-July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at * Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to'further amend said negative declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources Control Board's CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER Section 1. That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein and following, it is hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect upon the environment: The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an interim project to improve and maximize the operation of 75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 to handle 90-MGD constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD "T-211 AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-211 and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the wastewater' effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are: 1. Two flow equalization basins, a flow distribution box, sludge pumping and associated valving and piping. 2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C", increase height of discharge channel and instal- lation of two additional grit chambers. 3. Approximately 430-feet of 108-inch diameter pipe to carry effluent flows to the existing outfall booster pumping station. The proposed facilities would be constructed within the boundaries of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately. three-acres of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are those relating to construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the construction contract. The construction activity will take place within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction, there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened or, endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical habitats will be affected by construction. The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175 410 of flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date Sept, 1981) . The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975. During this period a number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved: "T-3" AGENDA ITEM'#15 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-3" 1. The 1977 Clean Water Act alloWs, under Section 301(h) , for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification (lessening) of the secondary treatment requirements. The Sanitation Districts have initially applied (September 20, 1978) for such a modification. 2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of. non-attainment area plans for designated areas not currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently under review, and has not been adopted. 3. The Clean Water Act of 19723, under Section 208, mandates the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater Management Plans. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan. is under review and has not been adopted. The Sanitation Districts have made the'determination that this project will not result in any additional treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan. Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. • Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution at the Districts' offices to be `r✓ available for public inspection and copying. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned special meeting field July 25, 1979. "T-4" AGENDA ITEM- #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-41' V J CO& EN"'�-� H. C. Smith Construction Company M c, r, 19J9 Nf�R/�GRI • b June 27, 1979 a •' • t ry Projec 2075 !--) Job No. P2-23-6 Grant C-06-1073-140 Letter No. 458 Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer County Sanitation District of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca.l iforni a Attention: Mark Butier Subject: Formal Protest for Engineer's Ruling -on Painting ' of. Insulated Piping •. Gentlemen: The followino correspondence is applicable to the subject Formal Protest: •� H. C. Smith letter number 341 dated March 2, 1979; Orange County Sanitation letter dated April -12, 1979, PCL 6-115; H. C. Smith transmittal dated May 4, 1979,_ f.orwarding a letter from Robert McMul l an '& Sons, dated M.ay 3, 1979, and a letter from the Waldinger Corporation number .343, dated Aril 23, 1979; Orange County Sanitation -letters dated June 14, 1979 and received by 11. C. Smith June 18, 1979; ' H. C. Smith letter number 435 dated June 13, 1979• In response to our letter number 435 the District issued further written direction and acknowledged receipt -of our notice of "Formal Protest". Forwarded herewith is the Waldinger Corporation's letter number 407 and letters dated June 11, 1979 and June 21, 1979, from Robert McMullan' s attorney; setting forth their respective positions. . . As previously stated H. C. Smith Construction Company is formally protesting the Engineer's ruling on painting requirements for "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS POST OFFICE BOX 643V. BROOK1HUAST F. RUSHARD, lIU14TINGION DEACli•CALIF011NIA 47646 ('1141 �Ju2.132i *;By tetiris, Chief Encirteer ' June 27, 1979 Page Two `'`p� $ The* Waldinger insulated piping on behalf of- its subcontractors, Corporation and Robert 1-1,04u.11an b Sons. P. C. Smith Constnction Company concurs with its subcontractors .posi*tion and requests . the Board of Directors to render a decision in this matter with in the required 45 days. a Very truly yours, H.. C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION ' • G. Barry Project Manr9ger D!4:9w Enclosures "U-2" AGENDA ' ITEM. #l6(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" ' . jt:ne 19 197.9 off Letter No. 407 }?. C. �li,ith CO*:Str'JCtjon CO.;�pany • P.O roX 6436 - ,3u.r:t: p0_on -"ebc , Cat a rG_rni a 02C46 . 1 7:tt2.ntion: :•:r. Gary 1•arr:r - Te. erence: Gr ance County Sr.p '2 (per-23-6) • hu;,tinc`on rezc}i , California Fair.ti r,g o.z IJ sulzted •Fipi),g • Gent Ie;.^.en ;:e are in rECt:l�t of :.he O?-anc e County sanitation Leis trict ' s letter cs J»ne i t ° • '� .� ' ain oipino . : r,i ch uIti:Ia rely 1..i� 6ir`c��ng a� cer t . recri� es ins—o l a-3 on is to be rzint ed in ):ceiling 1,-i to the AII1 d aintir,5 systcir, prior to insulation. ti Hoer paracra�.;� E-4 . entitled "i inal -Prot_ , 1.•C are hereby -rot c S c the �-e��Lire;:.enL to taint insulated piping A. prior to ir.sulot.ion �s s-:gel led out a.r, ;:ne Li str i ct ' s June ' 14 1 e t ter. cnovlc the : i n ter be able "Co taint the piping v)e already 'r:ave in --- tunnels and distributed around the site in na ace, .then_• this �a otest ,. ; f . �•�i 11 '�e. t•:i ti�ci r z:�n.. . t •-•-: Shoulca lne- !-.aad-i ncer Corporation be reGuireo to 1•.emove the pi pirc ir, .--- place , -as -t;eII as -ga her - uu t•he er•-• ;r.0.1�1nc: di stributee around t.)e site -for delivery to your , painting .su:_,co3�1 2-_ctc.r ' s vi�Je yard for - painting , i:e will expect. to L-c- reimLiji-sed for t'je costs involved it - . same. ' t:e are cu�'rFr,tly in a "bold and de141:" situation a:•:ait.ia:c �•oc�,. ..... _ •. .-s:�ecific direction.. or. this. natter . very :t'r- .,.,.: ��:•h%: 1•:ALD1:'GLR CO3.T-0Rh1_'1 Oi•: ...:. : • .__-... .-_ .: _ .Gary ?"'i chol Is C�-• /�; .. �. •c:nt �s:.� J1 c:::,•• . :c:.:c '.c P. O. EZIL :•.:�.:.;is!1 t'...:. :e.i. •: 11U-3" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS 4 t ;l;:.• "U-3" V... • •.r .+. ..t 1. J I. �� I Imo. ♦� �• '.. -N •L a .a.Mv./. N�••`�L' L4"•wC+:� ♦ Va.L.lt:..�.•.wl �i pa�,4tILa. " .; •• . w. I. w:t r.,b r 4001-7 0F.I F YS AT LA•�z• , ♦'. �f•-t►•p• J .t.....r/t V. Oi:)4ls. ilY.S7 k�.':1: kL'l:.I)1 � � t_�%+K r .•►„., 530 b Si}:EkT-14M .,w..cs G. t-•tcQs . rwLC A i•�wHCC Sail.' DIFCO. CALIFORNIA 92101 -,,.c« c C...&19.C,r p46v10 J tC•�.�✓wta 1ILE-mO►+C r3a-61t1 IN ACPLV RLrCR 70 JA•.+C S E. c.,�•✓ oND °9 . 214 Gw�• L, rw�:+' C (aArw CODE 71t) OUR r1LC _.. Pr I r A 1+-POL I O ` Z-aa-CT 7C'1"CL J0 IVS cc:s o•: ' June 21 , 1979 --•-C_1%rT1 r r, , -- R T. REC. REQ. N. C. S;ni th Ccnst_17L)ction Company ' P. O. - Box. 643S Huntinc;on Leach, California 92646 ti-tn. : Mr. Gary Barry, Project Manager Re: Job No. P2-23-6 Gentlemen: Y have received a copy of the County Sanitation Districts ` . 1atgst letter to you, dated June 14 , 1979 , as well as your letter • of June 19 to Robert 1'cN;ul l an. & Son, relative to the above-entitled ratter. On behalf of my client, •1 request that you ce;nand that the Coon ty provide a written decision pursuant. to Article 8-4 of the General Conditions, so that •I might file a further protest with the Board of Directors,_ as also provided for in the same section. As I mentioned in my, previous letter to you, should ;-;cMull an proceed to perform that work, including the additional work" as outlined in the County ' s letter of June 14 , this will be considered extra work , • for which payment is required pursuant to Mc11_1ull an' s Subcontract with you, and we will look to Snith Construction Company for said payments . Again,. I recuest that my previous let-ter of June 11 , 1979 be submitted to the. aoenc\• , as well as this letter. Please contact me should you have any questions. Since • � ours, E'JJ L3�a ��� PJI/3h �� ?000/ cc/.Robert ;•;c:•Sul 7 an 6 Son U-4" - AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-4" H. C• ConStructj.on Company . Attr.. G. 'Barrl• , Projc•c t- l•sanager June 11 , 1979 r Page. 2. to dr.sure that this practice is clearly spelled out and manifested in the soeci i i cations which they rely upon . McMullan A akes the Position that the practice has not been specifically rani fested and. consequently, any directions- to require this additional paint- ing , pri;fling and sandblasting will be construed as an extra. Conseobently, pursuant to Article E. of the Subcontract between Mcm4ul]an and Smith , we hereby put you on notice that this wor3; will not be done wi.thout a written direction from the ceneral contractor,which will be treated by Mc1•;ullan as a claim 'for extras . Be further advised that )•;cmullan does not intend to waive any of its rights under the .Subcontract by filing this protest. t•,e• re- serve the rights- set forth in t}le Subcontract agreement betwee-n McM'ul 1 an and Smith and any other rights to which McMullan is en- titled under the law. Please, ho%:lever, treat this letter as a letter of protest, and %-e request that it be directed to the- engineer, as required pursuant to 8-4 of the Standard Specifications, and we request that the enoineer provide a ruling within 45 dabs from the date of this protest. The engineer should also -be advised that any direction to perform any additional painting , priming and sand- blasting the project and expose Mcriullan . to delay dam- �joes•.not yet }mown. .Consequently, when said damages become }mown , .his information will be brought to your attention, since delay sarlaoes �:•i l l be considered fur Cher car;ages which r;cM•Sul l an will be entitled to recoup, as well as attorneys ' fees and costs should this matter not be amicably resolved- Please contact me should you' have any questions . Sincerely yours , `r` PETER P'0 I TO cc/.'Robert. Mcl•;u l 1 a n I . "U-5" AGENDA ITEM 116 W -- ALL DISTRICTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CAVFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540.2910 August 1 , 1979 (714)9G2.2411 S T A F F R E P O R T PAINTING OF INSULATED PIPING JOB NO. P2-23-6 Robert McMullan and Son, Inc. , a painting subcontractor to the Waldinger Corp. the pipe subcontractor to H. C. Smith Construction Company, the prime contractor to the .Districts for construction of 75-mgd Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 known as Job No. P2-23-6 (Grant No. C-06-1073-140) has filed a. protest with the Districts concerning the engineer's ruling on the painting of insulated piping. The subcontractor has indicated that the disputed work is estimated to be $12,570. The events leading to the protest consideration by the Boards are as follow: 1 . Letter of March 2, 1979 from k. C. Smith Construction Company requesting painting clarification for insulated piping, 2. Districts .response in detail clarification PCL-6-115, dated April 12, 1979, instructing contractor to paint all insulated piping pursuant to Sections 29-5(c) (6) , 59-0203.6 and 59-0203,7. 3. Districts letter of June 4, 1979 sustaining interpretation of April •*12,-. 1979 directing contractor to paint insulated piping. 4. Formal protest of engineer's ruling on painting of insulated piping submitted by H. C. Smith Construction Company, dated June 27, 1979, with enclosures. Formal protest requests a decision of the Boards of Directors within the required 45 days as set forth in Section 8-4 of the General Provisions of the Standard Specifications for this contract. 5. Breakdown of the disputed costs submitted by the contractor for painting of the insulated piping • in the amount of $12,570. REL:hjb .11V-1" AGENDA ITEM #16tB) - .ALL DISTRICTS „V-111 H. C. Smith Construction Company March 2, 1979 Grant C-06-1073-140 • Project 2075 Job No. P2-23-6 Letter No. 341 Ray Lewis, Chief Encineer County Sanitation District of Orange County •• 10844 E1l'is Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mark Butier Subject: Request for Painting Clarification for Insulated Piping Gentlemen: Paragraph 29-5 (c) (3) of the Standard Specifications states, . "Ingeneral, all esposed and insulated piping. . . . shall be painted- with aklyd enamal . . . . " Paragraphs 59-0203.E and 59-0203.7 of the detailed specification excludes the painting • of certain insulated piping. The pipi.ng schedule, section 65 indicates the only protection required for insulated piping is the insulation itself. Since the detailed specifications have precedence over the standard specifications it is our interpretation that insulated piping requires no primer and no finish paint. - -- •- We understand the District has in -the past required priming and painting piping prior to insulation. If this -practice is to be continued on this project we need to be advised in order to minimize delays and extra costs. Very truly yours, H. C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION G. Barry Project Manager D. .g i� w ►IAA, G 1979 COUNTY 5..1.:';r:;;d �;STF•l;,T� E14G)t!�:!:,!tr AGENDA 'ITEM .#16(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" . POST of FICE: BOX 6438.BROOK11URST& CUSHARD.HUNTINCTON BEACH,CALIFGRNNA 92646 ' (714)962•1:171 • COU\7Y SANITATION Di.S.TRICTS' .� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA `•r✓ Job No. P2-23-6 • C-06- 10 73-140 • . DETAIL CLARIFICATION: PCL-6- 115 Ap ri l 12, 19 79 H. C. Smith Construction Company = Post Office Box 6438 Huntington Beach , CA 92646 Attention : Gary Barry • . Project Manager Subject : Painting of Insulated Piping Sections 59-0200 and 29, Painting- H. C. Smith letter No, 341. ; Gentlemen : Piping which is to ' be insulated should be painted with an aklyd paint system as described in .Section 29-5 (c) (6) .- This - is the Districts standard practice.. ' Sections 59-0203. 6 and 59-0203. 7, which list equipment to receive • "high temperature paint" and which exclude insulated piping, are ' meant to apply only to _ "high temperature paint. " Very truly yours , Paul Mitchell • Associat-e Engineer PM:mee By: fZ2 2 36- 79 B6tidt>Ext &Irxlv1S L cc: J C E/G&H "N ExGxnbx WN C County Sanitation Districts S FS • of Orange County, Calif. TBR this detail clarification does not involve a change in contract price;any exceptions to,or claims under,this clarifica- .tior- must tie filed with the District in accordance with Paragraph 4-10 of the General Provisions. "V-311 AGENDA ITEM #16(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-3" •'•�Z COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS lil OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 4 , 1979 . • H. C. Smith Construction . Company t -- Post Office Box 6438 Huntington Beach , CA 92646 Attention: Gary Barry ` Project Manager Subject: Job No. P2-23-6 C-06-1073-140 6 t M ✓�. .c �ra , -• �-'1;1 ` - P.a=ng of Insulated Piping - Gentlemen: Reference is made to your original letter no. 341 dated March 2 , 1979 , requesting clarification -of painting require- -_ ments for insulated piping. The Districts issued their • original plan clarification 6- 115 dated. April 129 1979. Subsequently , the Districts received your transmittal letter dated* May 4 , 1979 , including letters from Robert McMullan • and Sons , Painting Subcontractor, and from Waldinger Corp. , Mechanical Subcontractor. These letters essentially stated that in their interpretation it is not within the scope of • contractural responsibility to' paint piping surfaces under insulated surfaces .. - ' These contentions •were -reviewed by the Engineer, and the Districts ' interpretation of painting 7is clearly setforth in the Detailed Specifications , Section 59-0203.3, Alkyd Enamel, Paragraph 25 , which states,- (25.) "All new exposed piping , conduit , and • insulated piping (except for stainless steel - clad insulation) . •: ." The insulated piping, except . for that piping covered by the'—- high. _ - temperature paint provisions of 59-0203. 6 _and 59-0203, 71 ' shall be primed and painted as setforth above. I. believe that this letter should substantiate the Districts ' position that this painting is required under contract require- ments. jt%-!B : cb By: .3ml _ 350- 79 Butier Engineering Inc. cc: J CE/G FH Actin For It`N C � - 9 ' C Aunty Sanitation Di:.,-ricts - SFS - of Oranot County. Callf. . . 'IV-Lill •r R AGENDA ITEM #16(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-4" C04vt s , • %9J9 �►' H. C. Smith Construction Company +G,N ,oN ER�NG%SjR/ • C, �s June 27, 1979 'Project 2075 C Job No. P2-23-6 Grant C-06-1073-140 Letter No. 458 Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer County'Sanitation District of Orange County* • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attention: 11ark Butier ' Subject: . Formal Protest -for Engineer's Ruling on Painting of Insulated Piping Gentlemen: . `.✓. The following correspondence is applicable to the subject Formal Protest: ' H. C. Smith letter number 341 dated March 2, 1979; , Orange County Sanitation letter dated April 12, 1979, PCL 6-115; H. C. Smith transmittal dated May 4, 1979, forwarding a letter- - from Robert McMullan & Sons, dated May 3, .1979, and a letter from the Waldinger Corporation number -343, dated Aril 23, 1979; Orange County Sanitation letters dated June• 14, 1979 and received by H. C. Smith June 18, 1979; H. C. Smith letter number 435 dated June 13, 1979. In response to our letter number 435 the District issued further written direction and acknowledged receipt of our notice of "Formal Protest". Forwarded herewith is the-Waldinger Corporation's letter number 407 and letters dated June 11, 1979 and June •21, 1979, from Robert McMullan's attorney, setting forth their respective positions. As previously stated H. C. Smith Construction Company is formally protesting the Engineer's ruling on painting requirements for 11V-511 . AGENDA ITEM #16(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-5" • . POST OFFICE BOX 6438,BROOKHURST& BUSHARO,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 9:646 ' 4714)962.1321 • . i Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer June 27, 1979 Page Two insulated piping on behalf of its subcontractors, The Waldinger Corporation and Robert McMullan & Sons. H. C. Smith Construction Company concurs with its subcontractors .position and requests the Board of Directors to render a decision in this matter with in the required 45 days. Very truly yours, H. C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION ' G. Barry Project Marger DM:gw Enclosures . "V-6" AGENDA ITEM #16(s) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-6" � l�il� L�L�•".1..`Jt1�JLi1 C� i,J�:r/'.�•i�Jl� � •, . June 19 , 1979 Letter No. 407 p. C. Smith Corstructior. Cons-rally • P.O. boy: 6438 Huntinut.on beach, California 92E46 Attention: 3•;r. Gary ^arry reference: Crance CountyS,P =2 (r2-23-E) _ Huntincton Beach , California Painting of Insulated Pipi lsg Gent 1 e;:.en: We are in receipt of --he Oranc,e Count}, Sanitation V, strict's letter of June 14 , 197 9 d ir`c t i ng that certain piping u-ni ch u lti:aa tely receives irsu 1 ati on is to be rain ted izi ;Reeving %•-i th the painting system prior to insulation. t'nc.er �:aragraF.h E-4 , entitled "Final Protest" , �:e are hereby pro .cs�i 2ic t m. he requireen` to Faint insulated piping prior to insulation as . spelled out. in the District' s June le letter. •Should the painter be able to Faint the biping we already have in the tunnels and distributed around the site in p1 acel. they: this protest -will be % i the r a n.. _ s remove the ping ir, ��,ou1d �°ne T•:alcizncer Corporation be rerun.red �,o r_r•; P-.r .place , as v.el l as�ga tier up the c�ti�er piping cisLYir:vtee aroun�: tj.e site for delis ter} to your •painting } ,-=-ctor' s pipe lard for s...�cos-��. . painting , ve will expect to L•e reiiiiLursed for the costs invo3ved ir. same. ' I e are currently in a "hold and c:ela��" situation a:•:aiti>;g �'o»�•.. specific direction on t'ni s matter. • M Fours very truly,j. . Ht; U.AIUDING=R CO.-NT-O?,h'_'IO-N Gary cl1ol 1 s nec hani ca I�f'`� r1• : .•: ►►V-7a AGENDA ITEM #16(B) - ALL DISTRICTS `:.:.• ►► A ` ��i•1• �'••1 '•♦ 60 v.IL L,.» MIL LrLR • HI LLYER I RWIN 6LlA,Is MILLTLP /7:.,L1i1. (IyCAp I. INWIM A PII:I►L5,bI0-1AL CA PPOI.ATIOM M'LI.TCOT, CO !.WOLD 94C.4M4N R.^%LLIIDV ATFORINEYS AT LAVA' , w,C••ACL /. WCLCM CA IORNIA FIRST B".:I; BUILDING b" ""11 e. =M1T•+ 530 B STREET-IGr' FLOOR JAMLS C. CMLLRS L•LC P. LA4AbCC - SAh DIEGO.CALIMRNIA 92101 JAIL. G.CH.4NC. 4AVIO J LOAOMwN •ICLCP/,ONC 2�4-Oltl IN REPLY pCrGP TO .+AwLS C DAJwMOND . OUR roLC—zJ l 14 pA4• S. ►.APOK[ (ARCH CODE.71�) •CSMIN [LI?A[IC7- SAIDC VC7Cp J. I POLITO VAUGA4CT SCTTCL JOINS � PIC-OK0 LDw"Os June 11 , 1979 CERTIFIED, ,.ITC"CL J. OLsoN RET. REC. REQ. H. C. Smith Construction Company Engineering Contractors P. O. Box 2330 ' Newport Beach, California 92663. Attn. : G. Barry, Project I:anager Re: Paintinq of Insulated Pining for Job No'. P2-23-6 . Dear I•Sr. Barry: This is to advise you that the firm of Hillyer '& Irwin represents Robert 1%5c2.9ullan and Son , Inc. This is to further advise you that on behalf of McMullan we are considering the letter of June 4 ,. 1979 from the County Sanitation District of . Orange County , California * as' a ruling or decision of the engineer pursuant to Paragraph 8-4 of the General Provisions and Standard Specifications for the County Sanitation. Districts of Orange County, the 1977 edition. It is mcmullan ' s position that any direction from the $anitation District to sandblast ,prime and paint pipe which will be ultimately insulated and painted .constitutes an extra and is not cal.led' out in any portion of the Standard Specifications or the Special Provisions and Detailed Specifications which are also a part of the contract documents. Specifically , Section 59-0203 . 3, Alkyd Enamel; Subsection 25, states , "All new exposed piping , conduit, and insulated piping (except for stainless steel clad insulation) are to be coated . " mcmullan is prepared- to do this, in that they will paint the piping wi'Fich is insulated_ To attempt to interpret the quoted section as also requiring the painting, priming and sandblasting of the pipe which ultimately is insulated stretches the interpretation beyond reason. . . I might point out that. California law is quite clear in that contract ambiguities, including specifications, will be construed acainst the person drafting same. I also note that the District, in its letter to your co:rlpany of i.pril 12, 1979 , indicates that it is their staneard practice to paint the insulated pipes. I7owever", it is the District ' s ob) ]Cotton "V-8" AGENDA ITEM- #IE16(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-811 HILLYER L IRVA"IN . ♦ aMpt LfOw►l CC4•G►awtON . H. C. Smith Construction Company Attn. : G. Barry, Project t;anao_er June 11, 1979 Page 2. to insure that this practice is clearly spelled out and manifested in the specifications which they rely upon. •I•:cMu l l an takes the position that the practice has not been specifically manifested and consequently, any directions* to require this additional paint- ing , priming and sandblasting will be construed as an extra. Consequently, pursuant- to Article E. of the Subcontract between McMu•11 an and Smith, we hereby out you on notice that this work will not be done without a -wri Uten direction from the general contractor,which will be treated by ilc?;ullan as a claim for extras. Be further advised that I•;c?•;ullan does not intend to waive any of - its rights under the Subcontract by filing this protest. We re- serve the rights set forth in the -Subcontract agreement between A;c-ullan and Smith and any other rights. to which McMullan is en- ti tl ed under the law. Please, however, treat- this • letter as a letter of protest, and we request that it be- directed to the engineer, as required .pursuant to 8-4 of the Standard Specifications , and we request that the engineer provide a ruling within 45 days from the date of • this protest. The engineer should also be - advised that any direction to perform any additional -painting , pr.iming and sand- blas-ing will delay the project and e>:pose McMullan to delay da-m- ages not yet known. Consequently, when said damages become known , this information will be brought to your attention, since delay damaoes will be con•si tiered further damages which I•;c1•Sullan will be entitled to recoup, as well as attorneys ' fees and costs should -this matter not be amicably resolved. Please contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely yours, PETER . I TO PJI/jh cc/Robert mcviiu I l a n . 'ter✓ • "V-911 AGENDA -ITEM #16(B) -- ALL DISTRICTS . "V-9" 1 1 v.... ... ..,�I Of H I ILL i E R � I R\V%I�� Gt/A,l, ►IILL.t� .E�l IV:•! � •.;. C : 'Lt. • ./.r,1. .4 P9801 1 5•Act"L GOwr.Oa&,IOM • ' I^- v.l`•PLC, C.9r,5.rvC)::0 1 .,� L.•A•. 1. ^LLf040T A170ir: :EY5 AT LAW . �/,� •. `•,; ••L ti u• ., r t ...t o 'C/4L11JP,l:1/. F I YST h�.ti!i I1 L I LU I h G •. ►.•• / t,a:�Nti p :.•,,.+ 530 h S—TRLET-14TH F1OOR "•! �'i� ��••CS G t«Etas __.:.. •• CALL a L•.r.•bCc SAW DIEGO. 0WFORN'tA 92101 ��•L� C. Cr•wa•nCT Iwt nepLY RLf CQ 10 'at•I' .i LC*-=-..nN 1 ELL F«Of+C 23,&•61t1 299 . 214 J4wt65 t ="U, *•+OND (*.Rr,► CODc 714) OLR rILC Gwav y r.,:,_►,tC P[ICQ J f41-OLI,O ••Af:jw6�C, JC1zCL J;r•NS - June 21, 1979 -CEXTIr T E, RET. REC. REQ. H. C.. Smith Construction Company , P. O: Boy: 6438 Huntington Beach, California 92646 Attn. : Mr. Gary Barry, Project Manager • Re: Job No. P2-23-6 • ' _ f Gentlemen: '. I have •received a copy of the County Sanitation Districts' -lates-t letter to you, dated June 14 , 1979 ,' as well as your letter of June 19 to Robert 1•;c1•Sullan & Son, relative to the zbove-entitled -matter. On behalf of my client, I request that you cemand that the County provide a written decision pursuant to Article 8-4 of the General Conditions, so that I might 'file a further protest with the Board of Directors, as also provided for in, *the same 'section. As I mentioned in my previous letter to you, should mcmullan proceed to perform that work, including the additional work as outlined in the County ' s letter of June 14 , this will be considered extra work , for which payment is required pursuant to 1•3cmul l an'' s Subcontract with you, and we will look to Smith Construction Company for said pa),ments . Acain, I request that my previous letter of June 11, 1979 be su:�mitted to the agency , as %ti•ell as this letter. Please contact me should you have any questions. Since - y ours, PJI/jh cc/.=o'.)er t -;c';u l ) a n b Son "V-10" AGENDA ITEM. #16(8) - ALL D I ST!?I CTS "V-101! JUL � i couNir SANITATION DIS i WaS'. ( (• ENGINEERING r'• :'• I1t.J : v1.a. .1.1�� •.1 . None. C-6 Sub COr.�:cC:p: t GbOri , ���� `: ct c,rd• -cqui,•;,-„Cr;t CC�^bt �,/✓! • 435 .Sub CC,?;%: 1c oil c:rrcGC C' � Sr �C u b T c% C ti Sub -ccs cL -._ .36 72 37 j;.fat cub .. '. � . Cc=: Y..,Al;��riG .�...a��s T C/l/. c/✓`ULZ-Axf ice;a� S�,�ccwr .�cr�,P �sT J0G/G9 1 J C. Sri�T , t'CIiC= .GC�C • - c• c? _.{a c r..�c.� x 4•c.• ;;Jr.C.r{ C c b t. 52M�'s rim�' .dr /�N•P 197 Ouc: 'need C 15 Sub Sub To:a4 - Und : 7nbur.a:?cc' C� 7 _ i7 GC�� Cs.C.� CC);/'•.haC��..Gli CCL�b 7 7 7 . Ss••r,::ar,•�y o� Cobtib - • To r1.0 Sub Con" r, ac%oh Cobb 2• PAse i.- ar.d Ovc!,.ficnd or Sub Cc) Z'Aac 0 A A . cc , nt 3. ` r. C�': rr:c"o: CC1►�b G e}:c Tr.,.at c: C a , 7tt. C:. ed-i nor.' Detel ed Co,;�r.act t;lor . : --- • - f �j•r 2.570 70T:L ADDED COSTS TH7S Ci;r.?:GE - -- ' • "V—l1" AGENDA ITEM -#16(B) — ALL DISTRICTS • r, z ¢ �. /3a , - :9 "V-12" AGENDA ITEM #16(s) - ALL DISTRICTS LAW OFFICES OF 11ourhe & 1� oJr* uff JAMES G. ROURKE SUITE 1020 AREA CODE 714 �+Ir1 THOMAS L.WOODRUFF CALIFORNIA FIRST BANK BUILDING 83S-6212 ALAN R. WATTS 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET KENNARp R. SMART, JR, TELECOPIER ALAN R. BURNS SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA 92701 (7141 835-7787 ROBERT L.LAVOIE DANIEL K.SPRADLIN MEMORANDUM To: Members of Joint Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts From: General Counsel Date: August 1, 1979 Re: Contract P2-23-6--H.C. Smith Protest of Engineer's Ruling ' I have reviewed the formal letter of protest submitted by the District's general contractor H.C. Smith, concerning- pipe painting requirements. It is my determination and opinion that the procedural `.d requirements to file a protest have been satisfied, and the Board of Directors may properly act on this protest-at this time. The decision of the Board should be based upon the engineer- . ing reports as submitted, together with any other written or oral evidence submitted prior to or at the hearing on August 8, 1979. Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel TLW:pj cc: Mr. F.A. Harper Mr. J.W. Sylvester "W" AGENDA I TENT .#16(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "W" R ejection Revisited , �• The Ha fee A. year ago 'about 2,000 angry taxpayers earn at least $8 million in interest during the attending a public hearing forced the directors ensuing three years,even allowing fora reduc- of the Orange County Sanitation Districts to tion of the principal to meet cash flow and abandon a plan to impose an unnecessary and expenditures. inequitable flat fee service charge. Well, the taxpayers apparently-were right about the agency wanting to build up its tax The taxpayers' ire had been raised by The coffers.And our analysis appears to be close to Register's account of how the OCSD was pro- bullseye. Official county treasurer's office fig- posing the new fee at a time that the agency ores show that during fiscal 1978-79, the �..✓ had a $90-million investment pool. Orange County Sanitation Districts' interest Agency officials denied that the flat fee income totalled nearly $7.7 million. And as of proposal was a thinly disguised effort to cir- June 30, 1979, the agency's investment pool cumvent Prop. 13, which had just been ap- had swelled to a few dollars less than $94 proved by state voters.The officials contended million. ` that if the flat fee was not imposed taxpayers Moreover,the taxpayers who spoke up to the would face even higher charges in three years bureaucracy a year ago prevented the invest- The taxpayers at the public hearing told the ment pool from being even larger. Instead of OCSD directors they didn't believe the dire the money sitting in some government bank warning. The directors were accused of want- account it stayed in the pockets of the taxpay- ing to build up the agency's tax coffers. ers who have needed.it during the past year— Our analysis of the flat fee proposal then a year of government-caused double digit inf- revealed that the $90-million tax pool would lation. 1 RESOLUTION N0. 79-109 RE: AGENDA ITEM No . 10 C I) a _ AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, ,2, 3, 51 6, 7 AND ll .OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-200 AS AMENDED The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 22 31 53 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby, further amended to add position classifications thereto,* or adjust authorized personnel and/or salary -ranges for position classifications therein, to reclassify one authorized Builder I to Builder III, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-5" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary 20200 Builder III 2 1051E 6.81/8.48 1180/1470 20600 Builder I 0 1048D 5.74/7.15 995/1239 Section 2. That the changes set forth in Section 1 shall become effective August 10, 1979. Section 3. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust authorized personnel and/or salary ranges for position classifications therein, to reclassify salary ranges for the position classifications, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-5" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary 60075 Electrical Foreman 1 1056G 9.08/11.31 1574/1960 60225 Lead Electrical Technician 2 1055E 8.48/10.56 1470/1830 60300 Electrical Technician II 5 1054E 8.03/10.00 1392/1733 Section 4. That the changes s-et forth in Section 3 shall become effective August 10, 1979. Section 5. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust authorized �.d for position classifications therein, to reclassify personnel and/or salary ranges salary ranges for position classifications set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-4" LABORATORY POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Hourly Salary 80100 Principal Laboratory 1 1057A 9.21/11.46 1596/1986 and Research Analyst 80200 Senior Laboratory and 4 1054A 7.81/9.73 1354/1687 Research Analyst 80370 Laboratory Analyst III 7 1OS3 7.35/9.14 1274/1584 80400 Laboratory Analyst II 3 1051D 6.77/8.42 1173/1459 80600 Laboratory Analyst I 2 1O50A 6.27/7.81 1087/1354 80700 Laboratory Technician 0 1048F S.82/7.25 1009/1257 Section 6, That, pursuant to action of the Boards of Directors at the regular yr' . joint meeting on March 14, 1979, the salary changes set forth in Section 5 shall become effective March 9, 1979. 1 � , Section 7. That Section 22, Subsection D of Resolution No. 79-20, is hereby amended by the addition thereto of a second sentence as follows: In addition thereto a one-time flat dollar payment shall be added to a paycheck no later than September S, 1979, as follows: For Employees Classified as: Flat Rate Laboratory Analyst II $300 Laboratory Analyst I $280 Laboratory Technician $260 • PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1979. l l PROPOSED LABORATORY CHANGES 8/2/79 Authorized Personnel Range No. & Salary @ Step 5 Increase One Time Classification Current Proposed Current Proposed Range Approx.% Flat Adjustment Prn. Lab. & Res. Anal. 1 1 1055E/$1830 1057A/$1986 1-1/2* 8.3% None Sr. Lab. & Res. Anal. 4 4 1053B/$1607 1054A/$1687 7/8* 4.8% None Lab. Anal. III 2 7 1052B/$1522 1053/$1584 3/4* 4.1% None Lab. Anal. II 4 3 1051D/$1459 1051D/$1584 None None $300 Lab. Anal. I 3 2 1050A/$1354 1050A/$1354 None None $280 Lab. Tech. 3 0 1048F/$1257 1048F/$1257. None None $260 Helper 0 0 5.45/hr. 5.45/hr. -- No change -- Part-Time Tech. 1 1 7.50/hr. 7.50/hr. -- No change -- Part-Time Ass't. 3 3 4.35/hr. 4.35/hr. -- No. change -- 21 21 * Retroactive to 3/9/79 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , August 8 , 1979 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. Moved, seconded and mp-nivr'asly zz—nt-A h; Approval of 1979-80 roll call vote: fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 1 Operating Fund $ 1,855,461 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 8,331,097 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 165,988 $10,352,546 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by Approval of 1979-80 roll call vote: fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 2 Operating $ 5,245,755 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 29,725,631 Facilities Revolving Fund 9,652,796 Bond $ Interest Fund - 1951 105,020 Bond $ Interest Fund - 1958 634,051 $45,363,253 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by Approval of 1919-80 roll call vote: fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 3 �..✓ Operating Fund $ 62698,366 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 2527582114 Facilities Revolving Fund 7,989.614 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 $ 1958 121412835 $41,5872929 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and are hereby, 'received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by Avnroval of 1979-80 roll call vote: _fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 5 Operating Fund $ 11418,230 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 72185,477 Facilities Revolving Fund 2,1602333 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 56,310 $10,82013S0 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by Approval of 1979-80 roll call vote: fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 6 Operating Fund $ 110952376 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 415932323 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 60,742 $ 517491441 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and. are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by Approval of 1979-80 roll call vote: fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 7 �./ Operating $ 1,566,263 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 10,080,865 Construction Fund 447,475 Fixed Obligation Fund 5,600 Facilities Revolving Fund 2,651,818 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 32,871 Bond and Interest Fund - 1962 296,084 Bond and Interest Fund - 1970 792,353 $15,873,329 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by Approval of 1979-80 roll call vote: }fiscal year budgets That the District's 1979-80 fiscal year budgets be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: DISTRICT 11 Operating Fund $ 1,627,725 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 10,960,175 Facilities Revolving Fund 558,336 Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 28,800 Bond and Interest Fund - 1958 115,626 $13,290,662 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of August , 19 79 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my a9d t 's 8t da of August 19 79 . Se 7 ary Boars of Directors o C unt San' tion Districts Nos. 3 5, 6, 7, and 11 S-107 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA L A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , August 8 , 1979 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. x x x x x x x x x ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing Districts' Superintendent to attend That the Districts' Superintendent be, 52nd Annual WPCF Conference and is hereby, authorized to attend the in Houston, Texas Water Pollution Control Federation's (WPCF) 52nd Annual Conference in Houston, Texas, October 7-10, 1979; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred therefor be, and is hereby, authorized. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of August , 1979 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set467t, 8th day of August 19 79 r..i e aards of Directors of Counn Districts Nos. 2, 3nd 11 S-107 8-8-79 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN ADVISE THAT LINDSLEY PARSONS, WHO HAD BEEN INVITED HERE TONIGHT TO RECEIVE A SPECIAL COMMENDATION FROM THE BOARDS, WAS CALLED OUT OF TOWN SO A FORMAL PRESENTATION WILL BE MADE AT THE NEXT JOINT BOARD MEETING, REPORT THAT THE ANNUAL WORK CONFERENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES WILL BE HELD AUGUST 22-25 IN MONTEREY, I AM PLANNING TO ATTEND, AS WELL AS DON WINN, THE DIS- TRICTSI REPRESENTATIVE TO CASA, AND DIRECTOR JIM SHARP, ANY DIRECTOR WHO WISHES TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS CONFERENCE SHOULD CONTACT THE GENERAL MANAGER IMMEDIATELY, ASK FOR CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE, WE NEED AN APPOINTEE FROM DISTRICTS 5, 61 OR 11 FOR A TWO-YEAR TERM, EPA IS UNDERGOING A MANAGEMENT TURNOVER , THE ENFORCEMENT CHIEF, MARVIN DURNING, SUBMITTED HIS RESIGNATION AS ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR, TOM JORLING, WHO HAS BEEN HEAD OF WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT WILL BE LEAVING THIS FALL AND JORLINGIS DEPUTY ASSISTANT FOR WATER PROGRAM OPERATIONS, JACK RHETT, WHO HAS HEADED THE MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION GRANTS PROGRAM DEPARTED ABOUT 3 WEEKS AGO, THESE MAJOR MANAGEMENT CHANGES, PARTI- CULARLY THE PEOPLE WHO GET THESE KEY SPOTS, WILL HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE DIRECTION EPA WILL MOVE IN THE FUTURE, IT WILL BE INCUMBENT UPON THE ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS AMSA, TO KEEP ON TOP OF THESE CHANGES AND GET TO KNOW THE NEW MANAGEMENT TEAM ONCE THEY ARE APPOINTED, MEETING DATE August 8. I.979 TIME 7:10 n-m.,DDISTRICTS 1,2,3,S,6,7&11 •��S DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS SCHUSTER . . . . . SHARP • • • • • • • V '� 1 � � ) ADLER YAMAMOTO WARD SVALSTADso RILEY . . .. . . . . ANTHONY• • • • • • �.T _ffl RILEY). . . . . . . •ANTHONY• • • • ✓ CRANK . . ... .- • HUTCHISON• • • • ✓ + MACAL ISTER)• • BAILEY• • • • • _ PERRY). . . . . . . .CULVER• • •• • DISTRICT 2 - COLLACOTT)•- • •FINLAYSON• • GAMBINA) • - - • •FOX•• •• • • • • FRIED) WEDAA ✓ _ NYBORG) • • • • • • -FRESE• • • ••• ✓ • •"" " """'-�-- ---�- WANNER) • • • • - • -GLOCKNER• • • ✓ RASHFORp)• • • • • HOLT• • • • •• • • • _ CORBETT) GRAHAM GAMBIN.4 .. .. .. FOX . . . . .. 0001 - RASHFORD) • • • • •HOLT• • • • • • • WELLS). . . . . . . . HOUSTON. . . . . ._'� ✓ - WELLS� : : • • • - • •HOUSTON• • •ANTI-CONY)• - • • • • i�'I-L-LEr2. . . • . .0 CRANK • • • • • •HUTCHISON• • ✓ CULVER�• • • • • • • PERRY• • • • • • • • ; '" GAMJ3INA) • •• • • •LE BARON. . . ✓ GRAHAM • . • • • • • ROGET. . . . . . • • _ MANDIC) . . . . . . .MA R� SEYMOUR)• • • • •• ROTH . . . . . . • . f '' RYCKOFF MC INNIS HOYT) � . . .. . . .�. . . . . . . . . . SMITH• • • • • • • • `� APdTHONY •- • • • •MtLLFR• • • • • S1.'ALSTAll}. . • • • STANTON• • • • • • ✓ ✓ MACALLISTER)- •PATTINSON• • ✓ WINTERS). • • • • • VE,6A�S�EZ• • • • ✓M ✓ -� CULVER). . . . . . .PERRY• • • • • • IWARD). . . . . . . ••YAMAMOTO • • • • '' wT t GRIFFIN DISTRICT 3 ANTHONY�: : : : : -REESE -RILEY• • • • •• ✓ GRAHAM)• • • • • • •ROGET• • • • • • ✓ SEYMOUR)• • • • • •ROTH• • • • • • - NYBORG). . •• • . FRESE. . . . • • • • -} EVANS)- • - • • • • •ROWAN• • • • - • - ✓ SVALSTAD) ADLER HUM�MEL?. . . . . . •RYCKOFF. . . . ✓ ✓ ; .- LASZLO • • - • • • •SEITZ• • • • • - MACAL ISTER). . BAILEf. , tt , . . . •PcRRY)• • • • • • • • CULVER. . . .. . . ✓ - - I SCHUSTER)• • • • •SHARP. . . . . . COLLACOT) • • • • • FINLAYSON. .'. . ✓ .,- �HOYT)- - - o . . . . oSMITH-.oe000 ✓ CORBETT) .GRAHAM - SVALSTA )• • • • •STANTON• • • • ✓ ' `-T RYCKOFF�• . - . • .STRAUSS• • • • GAMBINA�. . . . . .LE BARON• • • • • ZOMMICK)• • • • • •SYLVIA• • • • • GRIFFIN • • • • • •REESE• • • • • • • • .� - SEYMOUR)•• • •• •ROTH-•• • • • •• • ✓ 1 . SILLS)-• • • •• • •VARDOULIS• - EVANS) ROWAN ✓ fi WINTERS)• • • • • •VELASQUEZ- - ✓ " " • " " " " " � YAMAMOTO) WARD '•r.n� . . . .. . . �- . .. . . . . . . . . . LAS�LO) SEITZ- • •. • . FRIED) WEDAA OMMICK. . . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . . v . . . . . . WHEELER . . . . . .WEISHAUPT. . • • ✓ SHEELER)•• • - • •WEISHAUPT- • ✓ SCHUSTER) • •• • -WELSH- • • • • • ANTHONY . . . . ..WIEDER. . . . . • - .� 1fELASQUEZ). . . .WINTERS. . . . . . i�""v� , . ANTHONY . . .• , •WIEDEk. • • • • . . • ✓r ✓ -�- RYCKOFF . • . • • •WILLIAMS• • • YAMAMOTO. . WARD)... ... . . . VELASQUEZ) .. . .WINTERS. . . . DISTRICT IWARD). . .. . .. ..YAMAMOTO. . • HUMMEL) . . . . ..RYCKOFF. . . . . . OTHERS RYCKOFF • • . • •;STRAUSS• • • • • • -i ANTHONY •• • • • •RILEY• • • • • • • • ✓ r HARPER . . . . . SYLVESTER • . ✓ DISTRICT 6 ,� LEWIS .. . . . . __✓_ CLARKE • • • • • (RYCKO F)• • •• ••MC INNIS. . . . . BROWN • • . •• • CRANK . .. . . . o •HUTCHISON. • • • V lR I LEY . .. . . . ..ANTHONY. . . . . . ✓ - ' ��'� WOODRUFF • •• ✓ DISTRICT 7 Gt' HOHENER . • • • 1 HOWARD •• • • • HOYT) SMITH ✓ ✓ t- � HUNT .. . . . . . ✓ KEITH RYCKOFF)•• . ' ' ' OCKhti - . . • • ✓ � �n6�J'b KENNEY . . . . . llSCHUSTER�_- -- _- -- --WELSH IAHNER) ... . . ..GL . . . . . . ✓ . . . . . ANTHONY). . . . . .MILLER{. _�L- ✓ t� 111�!!!y� ���,/ LYNCH . ... . . . SILLS)• • •• • • ••VARvOULIS. . . . 'f - � MADDOX .� YAMAMOTOWARD- f � - MARTINSON • • " " "-" � PIERSALL . . . • ••. . STEVENS . . . . DISTRICT 11 - TRAVERS . . .. - (MACALL STER). .PATT I NSON. . . .,� MANDIC to, ANTHONY). . . . ..WIEDER. . . . . . ._ %/_ 8/8/79 MEETING DATE August 8, 1979 TIME 7:30 -.m.DISTRICTS 1 'F 2 l:_.p_';;r%'7.&11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS SCHUSTER�. ... . SHARP . • • . . •• So� .I YAMAMOTO WARD . . . . . .. .` _f1 SVALSTAD)• • • • •ADLER. .. . . . �� RILEY . . . . . ... ANTHONY• . . . . . RILEY). . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . CRANK)• . • .• .• • HUTCH I SON• • . ._ MACAL I STER). •BA I LEY• • • • a_ PERRY�. . . . . . . .CULVER. . . . . � DISTRICT 2 COLLACOTT)• - • •FINLAYSON• - �al GAMBINQ) • • • • • •FOX. . . . . . • •_�G FRIED)" " "" """ 'WEDAA �� �, _ NYBORG) . . . . . . .FRESE• • • • • • ✓ WAHNER) • • • • • • •GLOCKNER• • •_!� RASHFORp)• • • •• HOLT• • • • • • • • • ►w_ _C�.�. .�_ CORBETT) GRAHAM . . .. . . - . . . . GANiBINA . . .. .. FOX . . . . . . . . ._!� �._ —�. RASHFORD) HOLT WELLS). . . . . .... • . • •••HOUSTON. . . . . . ✓ . . . . . . " ' ANTHONY)• • • • •• MILLER.. . .. . .�_ - — WELLS • • • • • . . .HOUSTON• • • •�,G CULVER PERRY _��, CRANK . . . . . . • •HUTCHISON- - " "' " " " " GAMBIN� ) • • • • • •LE BARON• • - �G GRAHAM . . . . . . . ROGET• • • • • • •• MANDIC) _. ' SEYMOUR) ROTH _ • • � �� � - " "" " " " " RYCKOFF • • • • • •MC INNIS. . . HOYT) •• • • • • •• SMITH• • • • • • • • Vol ANTHONY� • STANTONij::MILLER SVALSTAD)• • • •• STANTON. �_ MACALL STEPATTINSON• •_.�� WINTERS)• • • • • • .&_.._�._-- • • •�_ ..�._ �ULVER� PERRY WARD) YAMAMOTO . .. .. . - . . . . . . • • • • • •• • • " "-� — GRIFFIN REESE DISTRICT 3 ANTHONY • • • - • -RILEY• • • • • •_� GRAHAM). . . o - - •ROGET• • • • • •_joe. W. SEYMOUR) • • • • • •ROTH•- • - • • •� IG NYBORG). . . . .. FRESE. . . . . . . ._�/ _ EVANS). . . . . . • •ROWAN• • • • • •_.y� �SVALSTAD). . . . . ADLER.. . . . . . ._ _ 4 HUMMEL� - • •RYCKOFF• • • - MACAL ISTER).. BAILEY. . . . . . . �/ _0 .LASZLO • • •• • • •• • • -SEITZ• • • •• • •PGRRY�• • • • •- •• CULVER• . . -. . .yo SCHUSTER).• • • • •SHARP• • • • • •�G COLLACOT)• • - •- FINLAYSON. . . .L_ HOYT). . . . . . . . .SMITH- - - - •_u*--- CORBETT). . . . ..GRAHAM. . . ... . ._ �_ SVALSTA )• • • • •STANTON• • • • ✓ GAMBINA RYCKOFF • • • • • •STRAUSS• • • • ✓ - • • • ••LE BARON• • • • •_�G .�L, ZOMMI K . . .. . .SYLVIA• • • • * U GRIFFIN • • • • • •REESE• • • • . •• •_�,,G �L— SEYMOUR) ROTH _ SILLS . . . . . . . .VARDOULTS• •_!� . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. EVANS) ROWAN i -E�RS)" " " " -- " -. " .. ..LAS� • � • " �� ' � •� • •�" FRIED) - ' ' ' • ' ' .WEDAA. . . . . . ..LO) SEITZ �_ �L � YAMAMOTO)- " "WARD• " " ' _ OMMICK. . . . . ..SYLVIA.• • • •• • -.��. - —�1 WHEELER . . . .. .WEISHAUPT. . . ._� y SHEELER)• • • • • •WEISHAUPT• •_�/ ANTHONY WIEDER SCHUSTER) • • • • -WELSH• • • • • •_ VELASQUEZ). . ..WINTERS. . . . .. _ IL_ ANTHONYJ• • • • • •WIEDER• • • • •s� WARD). . . 0. ....YAMAMOTO. . . . . � . . . . . .�5. . . VELASQUEZ)• • • •WINTERS. • ••�,G DISTRICT 5 WARD)• • • • •• • • •YAMAMOTO• ••_..�,c HUMMEL) . . .. ..RYCKOFF. . . . . . OTHERS . RYCKOFF)• • • • •.STRAUSS• - •• • - NTHONY)•• • • • •RILEY• •• • • • • • N HARPER • •• . - SYLVESTER • DISTRICT 6 - LEWIS U-) CLARKE • • • •• (RYCKO F)• • .•• •MC INNIS. . . . . / _ BROWN 4CRANK . . . .. . ..HUTCHISON• • • •_� tRILEY . . .. o.. .ANTHONY• • • • • • _ WOODRUFF • •- DISTRICT 7 HOHENER • • • • fig ) HOWARD •• • • • 11HOYT) . • • • • • • •SMITH• • • • • • • • ✓ HUNT. - RYCKOFF)• • •• • •I-- KEITH • • • IAH • • - YPJER) KENNEY • . • • - f .... ..GLOCKNER. . . . . . LYNCH. _ ANTHONY). . .. . .MILLER,, . , q f ,�. DDOX SILLS). . . . . .. .VARDOULIS. . . ._�� _�Z MARTIN YAMAMOTO • • •• •WARD• • •• • • .. :.- MARTINSON • • RSALL SCHUSTER�• • • • •WELSH• .. . . . ._,� y— STEVENS STEVENS .• . . DISTRICT 11 TRAVERS . . .. Chl (MACALL STER). .PATTINSON. . . .�/ �MANDIC) .. . . .. .MA&A ILO19"W. . ANTHONY) .. . . ..WIEDER. . . . . . . y _ ]_3 f 8/8/79 AUGUST 8, 1979 MTG. NOTES i,.,) Introduced Director Welsh who then gave Invocation. (5) New Director Finlayson introduced himself. (8) (a) Report of Joint Chairman Chairman Fox advised that Lindsley Parsons, who had been invited here tonight to receive a special commendation from the Boards, was called out of town so a formal presentation will be made at the next Joint Board Meeting. Reported that the Annual Work Conference of CASA will be held August 22-25 in Monterey. Said he and Don Winn, Districts ' representative to CASA, and Jim Sharp would be attending. Advised that any Director wishing to participate in conference, should contact the General Manager immediatel: Re Fiscal Policy Committee, asked for nomination of candidates for Committee. Advised they have a vacancy for one member from either District 5, 6 or 11 for a two-year term. Director Strauss was nominated from District 5; Wieder from District 11; and Hutchison from District 6 . Fox said we would have a hand vote on these Directors at the next meeting. FPC has about 10 meetings a year. Said we will continue to do what we have been in the past and make their program known. Fox then asked Supv. Anthony to introduce new Director Edison Miller. He then reported that EPA is undergoing a management turnover. Said the Enforcement Chief, Marvin Durning, submitted his resignation as Assistant Administrator effective Sept. 1st. The Assistant Administrator, Tom Jorling, who has been head of Water and Waste Management will be leaving this fall and Jorling' s Deputy Assistant for Water Program Operations, Jack Rhett, who has headed the massive construction grants program, departed about 3 weeks ago. These major management changes, particularly the people who get these key spots, will have an impact on the direction EPA will move in the future. It will be encumbent upon the organizations such as AMSA to keep on top of these changes and get to know the new management team once they are appointed. (8) (b) Report of the General Manager FAH advised that we have received a report from the County Treasurer's office indicating that our Director of Finance has earned for the Districts some $7'h million in interest this past fiscal year. Added that Treasurer charged $43,600 to take care of money. Reported that we have been soliciting applications for Chief of Operations from all over the country. Said he would like some direction from the Board as to whether we would be able to pay to have an appli- cant flown out here. Is a good applicant. Would be in charge of operation of the plants and laboratory and industrial waste section. Perry said he thought that was an administrative decision. Go ahead if you think it is worthwhile. It was then so moved and seconded to allow staff to do this. Voice vote on motion. Motion carried. Mr. Harper then reported on a couple consent calendar items . Re Item 10 (e) - Figure should be $150, 000 rather than $15, 000 . Have to negotiate with Western Gear because units are made by Western Gear. Re Item 10 (i) - Stated that in cluded in material mailed to Directors was some information on journeyman builder. Also included some info on upgrading of our electrical personnel under reclassifications. Said the portion that wasn't mailed and is in their folders tonight has to do with the lab. Said during negotiations last December, entered into Memorandum of Understanding and indicated we would validate their positions . One of the problems with the lab for many years is that we haven't been able to evaluate their positions so we feel comfortable with salaries and classifications. Their classifica- tions were never looked into but have done that now. Said the last page of resolution in folders indicates that quite a few of our people were working out of classification. Five of the people were actually journeymen analysts or technicians and yet were working out of lower classifications. Are recommendint that we make some basic adjustments in the salary schedule as well as upgrading the Lab Analyst III. These people have college degrees and are working on technical aspects . Because we have held them back since March, are recommending giving them a lump sum figure equal to 4 .1% increase. Will open up positions in the upper classifications and make them apply for these positions. Re Item 17 - Re Warehouse Office Expansion job. No one came to the bid. Had a bid opening one year ago and received one bid at that time which we rejected. Engineering Department has talked to five contractors that took out plans. With some negotiation might be able to bring something back to Board for your direction. Engineer's estimate was $175, 000 . Re SCAG, received a letter from them requesting that OCSD, IRWD, AWMA, OCWA and SERRA appoint one member to be represented on the South Coast Water Quality Advisory Committee. Understand that IRWD representative has talked to our Joint Chairman and they will go with whoever we support. Fox asked if there was anyone here that would be interested in taking on another meeting in an advisory capacity with SCAG. Director Ruth Bailey volunteered. Thanked her. (8) (c) Report of General Counsel Re update on Cease and Desist Order, is in hands of Attorney General. Had a fairly lengthly conference a couple weeks ago. Gave no promises on his part one way or another. He hadn't obtained all the documents from Regional Board yet. Said he is optomistic that they may not file to levy penalties against us. Said they agreed to get together sometime around September 1st. Think this is in our best interests. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR � Yamamoto asked for a clarification of items (c) and (e) . Re (c) - asked why it had to be plastic ?? FAH answered that it was requested by SWRCB so there would be no seepage down into the secondary landfill. % Re (e) - asked why it wasn't put out for bid? FAH explained because it was manufactured by Western Gear Company and they are the only one that manufacturers the gears. -2- (13) Re budgets Fox commended Fiscal Policy Committee for their work on the budgets. ♦./ Made it the easiest for the Executive Committee in a long time. (14) Flow Equalization Facilities FAH was asked to explain flow equalization facilities. He stated that since 1952 have been trying to build some additional facilities here to take care of treatment plant capacity development going on. Have been involved with preparation of EIR/EIS in connection with EPA in San Francisco for quite a few years. Two years ago about March we submitted report and had been assured that once the report had been completed and adopted, we could proceed with required facilities that we needed. Unfortunately, two years ago we were planning on full secondary treatment but were fighting to change the law. The confusion over the secondary treatment issue delaying finalizing the EIS. Later one representative from EPA in S.F. talked to Executive Committee and said we needed to complete the EIS on the basis of full secondary treatment because waiver has to do with permit application. The Executive Committee recommended to the Joint Boards to complete EIS on basis of full secondary treatment. They then asked us to come to S.F.- and discuss this thing and they came up with flow equalization. It meant they were going to give us State and Federal funding to improve our headworks at Plants 1 and 2 to take care of our hydraulic needs and to give us more capacity and get flows through secondary treatment at Plant No. 2. The purpose of it all being what goes out the end of the pipe after going through these other facilities would be of a rather high quality and certainly would warranr �..i getting a waiver on the secondary treatment issue. Said that meeting was here in April. Came back and discussed with E.C. and Board who authorized us to proceed immediately to get this designed. Were informed by State that if we could get plans in by September, could move ahead. In June had another meeting. Were some problems at State level. Said all systems go. Then a couple weeks ago had a meeting and it turns out we have more problems at State level after worrying about Federal level for five years . Complaint is that we are proceeding on basis of Negative Declaration and saying this doesn't have any environmental impact. Discussed this in detail . At the end of the meeting decided they would take it to their legal counsel for a ruling. Unfortuanately, on the evening of the Executive Committee meeting a couple weeks ago we were informed that their legal people said we had to complete an EIR under the CEQA requirements. They gave us a draft today of what we have to do. Will be going through CEQA requirements . Will be reporting back to Executive Committee. Have told engineers not to go on crash program to get this done but to proceed because Districts are going to need this facility as it is part of our application for ocean waiver. Said the ocean waiver is a provision in the 1977 Clean Water Act to permit marine dischargers a waiver of full secondary treatment requirements . If we can avoid this additional construction, can save operating costs for years and years. Said this is where we stand right now. Will be back to Directors with a report. -3- (16) H. C. Smith Protest (d) Strauss moved to sustain Chief Engineer's denial. Motion seconded. Discussion: Asked what total contract for H. C. Smith was; answered $30 million. REL said the protest is really from a sub of a subcontractor of H. C. Smith. Painting contractor does not agree with my interpretation of plans and specs. They say to paint pipe, will be an additional $12, 000. McMullen ofxRxxRxx2mikk corrected REL and said this is a first subcontractor not a second. Attorney for subcontractor (Pete Duboletto ??) spoke. Said McMullen matter is relatively simple. Said as he understood the problem, it is Engineer's interpretation of "exposed piping" . Some of this pipe is steel and if it is insulated, has some sort of wrapping on it. Agree that any pipe that is insulated, they will paint. Difficulty arises with exposed piping. Wants piping painted and then insulated. Don't believe plans and specs provide that contractor is obligated to paint pipe, insulate and then paint the insulation. Referred to one of the sections of the General Provisions on high temperature paint, it says that it be applied to exposed uninsulated pipe. In another section it defines exposed to include insulated pipe. Feel they are entitled to extra pay if we are directed to do this work. Asked for example of unexposed pipe. REL said buried pipe. Ray added that based on detailed specs, they should be painted - "all new, exposed piping, conduit and insulated piping. " Attorney said in another section says high temperature paint shall be applied to exposed uninsulated steam lines, valves, etc. " REL stated that they must realize that Standard V Specs are pre-empted by detailed specs. Says insulated piping not insullation. Director asked what is the purpose of painting and then insulating and painting again? REL answered that many times there is sweating and corrosion that takes place under insullation. Insullation is for energy conservation to protect heat loss . Wedaa questioned term "standard practice" . Asked if contractor had even built one of these items before? Should they have known this before? REL said he had no knowledge if the contractor had or not. Attorney said his contractor had not worked for our Districts before. Director asked Attorney if they had tried to obtain this from H. C. Smith and he answered yes. Then asked if H. C. Smith denied their request. Attorney said according to contract they have to go to contractor and ask them to go to Districts ' Board. Smith said aren't we suppose to work this out with H. C. Smith. H.C. Smith representative said they have filed this on behalf of two of their subcontractors because they can't come directly to the Districts. Director asked if there was any benefit in painting on top of insullation. REL said for protection and for color coding. Wieder asked if there had been any other instances where Chief Engineer's ruling on a job reached the Board? (Didn't hear answer) REL added that he would agree with their attorney that it is probably not as clear as it should be and will be clarified in the future. We have had many contracts and this is the first time this has come up. P1-16 was this way. -4- Anthony asked FAH and GC to review this and give Directors a recommendation. TLW said they have reviewed this with REL and he had advised Ray that he thinks he has a sound basis for his ruling. Exposed piping insullation must be painted. Is some room for interpretation. Is sound basis but not 100% correct. Frese moved to sustain Chief Engineer' s denial. Motion seconded. (same motion had been made earlier before discussion) Culver asked where it was that they said they couldn't possibly paint the pipe that is in now. Attorney said it can be done but will cost $12, 000. Anthony asked if compromise settlement would be in order. REL answered probably. Three considerations before the Directors: (1) Sustain Engineer's ruling; (2) Go along with contractor' s request for $12,000; (3) Could be compromise settlement between $-0- and $12, 000 . In reviewing the cost, we would not agree with their cost. Feel it is something less than that. Asked Ray if he had discussed the price and tried to negotiate and he said no. Called for the question. Roll call vote on motion. Motion to sustain Engineer's denial passed by vote of 4 Districts in favor, 2 against and 1 District tied. -5-