Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-07-25 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �,. AREA COODOE 714 S40-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. O. BOX 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927OB 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 23, 1979 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING DISTRICT NO, 1 WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1979 — .8:30 A,Ms COUNTY OF ORANGE - HALL OF ADMINISTRATION .10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (CONFERENCE ROOM - SUPERVISOR ANTHONY"S OFFICE) SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ,r I am calling a special meeting of the District No. 1 Board of Directors at the above hour and date. The purpose of this meeting is to consider an amendment to the amended negative declaration on 75 MGD- Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25),* to incorporate additional information requested by the State Water Resources Control Board. /s/James B*. Sharp James B. Sharp Chairman ? u ' Jetr°'fay, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS s °' TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 4 0-2 91 9 1 o��,,�t 62-241 1 P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) ,July 23 1979 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING DISTRICT N0, 1 WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1979 - 8:a0 ABM, COUNTY OF ORANGE - HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (CONFERENCE Room - SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE) SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA _r I am calling a special meeting of the District No. 1 Board of Directors at the above hour and date. The purpose of this meeting 'is to consider an amendment to the amended negative declaration on 75 NGD- Improved Treatment at . Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), to incorporate additional information requested by the State Water Resources Control Board. /s/James B. Sharp James B. Sharp Chairman WARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 DISTRICT No. 1 9540 62-2-2411 96211 AGENDA SPECIALMEETING WEDNESDAY.$ DULY 25;' '1979­ '8':30*•A,M, COUNTY OF ORANGE HALL OF IbMINISTRATION 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (CONFERENCE ROOM - SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE) SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA (1) Roll call (2) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tem (3) Consideration of motion waiving- special meeting notice requirements as provided for in the• Districts' Rules of Procedure for Meetings . (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25. See page "A" (5) Consideration of motion to. adjourn RESOLUTION NO. 79-106 AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED ti•.r� TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23, TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 21 31 51 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE• 75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 22 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED, TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT N0. 2, JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, in April, 1976, the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) and as a result of said study; declared that an environmental impact statement was not required; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of.Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, received, filed and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a significant affect on the environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency, and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 61 7 and 11 of Orange County; California, on December 8, 1.976, adopted Resolution No. 76-2062 _making a negative declaration re 75-MGD•Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23); and, WHEREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Pl.ant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been advised that the Environmental Protection Agency -is to amend their April 8, 1976 �..d finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, "A-1 It AGFNDA ITEM #4 "A-1" WHEREAS, the Boards• of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 60 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the environment and has concluded that said project would not have a significant affect on the environment and, therefore, the Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 32 S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 7S-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to further amend said negative declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources Control Board's CEQA Guidelines, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein anf following, it is*hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect upon the environment: The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an interim project to improve and maximize the operation of 75410 of Improved Treatment at Plant•No. 2 to handle 90-MGD constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD "A-2" AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-2" and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the: wastewater effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for L.rPt •this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are: 1. Two flow equalization basins, a flow distribution box, sludge pumping and associated valving and piping. 2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C", increase height of discharge channel and instal- lation of two additional grit chambers. 3. Approximately 430 feet of 108-inch diameter pipe to carry effluent flows,to the existing outfall booster pumping station. The proposed facilities would be constructed within the boundaries of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately three acres of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are those relating to construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the construction contract. The construction activity will take place within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction, there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened or endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical habitats will be affected by construction. The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175-MGD of flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date July, 1981) . The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975. During this period a number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved; "A-311 AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-311 1. The 1977 Clean Water Act allows, under Section 301(h) , for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification (lessening) of the secondary treatment requirements. The Sanitation Districts have initially applied (September 20, 1978) for such a modification.' 2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of non-attainment area plans for designated. areas not currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently under review, and has not been adopted. 3. The Clean Water Act of 1972, under Section 208, mandates the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater Management Plants. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan is under review and has not been adopted. The Sanitation Districts have made the determination that this project will not result in any additional treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan. Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 51 69 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution at the Districts' offices to be available for public inspection and copying. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting held July 25, 1979. "A=4" AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-4" e t BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post'Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,. Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 DISTRICTo. 1 962-2-241 1 lit11 r� AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY,''JULY 25'$­1979 - '8':30- A,M COUNTY OF ORANGE HALL. OF ADMINISTRATION • 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (CONFERENCE ROOM — SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE) SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA . Y . (1) Roll call • - (2) oint nt of F A. H re } Consideration of motion waiving- special meeting notice 'requirements as provided for in the* Districts' Rules of Procedure for Meetings ( Consideration of Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25.' See page "A" (5) Consideiation of motion to. adjourn S;'3Sr RESOLUTION- NO. 79-106 AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED TREA'111ENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23, 7.0 INCLUDE- FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREA-DIENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25 A RESOLUTION OF 711E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE• 75-MGD IMPROVED TREAD-LENT AT PLANT NO. 22 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED, TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING- FOR NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, in April, 1976, . the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) and as a result of said study; declared that an environmental impact statement was not required; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 22 31 S,• 6, 7 and 11 of.Orange County, California, on December 8, .1976, received, filed and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved ; Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a significant affect on the . environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency, and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 31 S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County; California, on December 8, 1.976, adopted Resolution No. 76-206, making a negative declaration re 75-MGD•Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23); and, %1EREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25) , and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been advised that the Environmental Protection Agency -is to amend their April 8, 1976 finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, WHEREAS, the Boards* -of Directors of County -Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 20 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the environment and has concluded that said project woukd not have a significant affect on the environment and, therefore, the Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include- said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, ' WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources Control Board CSWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to further amend said negative declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources Control Board's CEQA Guidelines.. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein an g following, it is*hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect upon the environment: The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an interim project to improve and maximize the operation of 75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant-No. 2 to handle 90-MGD constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD HA-2 11 AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-211 and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the; wastewater effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for -this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are: 1. Tw .flow equalization basins, a flow distribution box, sludge pumping and associated valvi-ng and piping. 2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C", increase height of discharge channel and instal- lation of two additional grit chambers. 3. Approximately 430 feet of 108--inch diameter pipe to carry effluent flows.to the existing outfall booster pumping station. The proposed facilities wou-ld be constructed within the boundaries of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately three acres i.d of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are. those relating to construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the - construction contract. The' construction activity will take place - within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction, there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened or endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical habitats will be affected by construction. The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure ' designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175-MGD of flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date July, 1981). The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975'. During this period a number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved: ►►A-3►► AGENDA ITEM i#4 ►►a-3►� 1. The *1977 Clean Water Act allows, under Section 301(h), for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification (lessening) of the secondary treatment requirements. The Sanitation Districts 'have initially applied (September 20, 1978) for such a modification.' 2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of non-attainment area plans for designated. areas not ' currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently under review, and has not been adopted. 3. The Clean Water Act of 1972, under Section 208, mandates . the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater Management Plants. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan is under review and has not been .adopted. The Sanitation Districts have made the determination that this project will not result in any additional treatment capacity acit at Plant • r No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or' adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan. Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution at 'the Districts' offices to be �davailable for public inspection and copying, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting held July 25, 1979. "a'4" AGENDA ITEM #4 A-4 11 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post office Box 8127 OF Grange County, California - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 f1 TRICT No. 1 962-241S962-211 AGENDA SPECIAL•MEETING WEDNESDAY,''JULY 25�..1979"_ '8'c 30••A,M. COUNTY OF ORANGE-- HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (CONFERENCE ROOM — SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE) SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA (1) Roll call (2) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tem (3) Consideration of motion waiving- special meeting notice requirements as provided for in the' Districts' Rules of Procedure for Meetings (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25. See page "A" (5) Consideration of motion to. adjourn RESOLUTION NO. 79-106 AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23, TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE• 75-MGD IMPROVED TREADIENT AT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED, TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT N0: 20 JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, in April, 1976, the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) and as a result of said study; declared that an environmental impact statement was not required; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of.Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, received, filed and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved _ Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a significant affect on the environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency, and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 51 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, adopted Resolution No. 76-206, making a negative declaration re 75-MGD,Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23); and, WHEREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been advised that the Environmental Protection Agency -is to amend their April 8, 1976 finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment- Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, "A--1" AGFNDA ITEM #l1 "A-1" WHEREAS, the Boards* of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,• 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether ] the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the environment and has concluded that said project would not have a significant affect on the environment and, therefore, the Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to further amend said negative declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources Control Board's CEQA Guidelines, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 'That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein and following, it is*hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect upon the environment: The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an interim project to improve and maximize the operation of 75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant°No. 2 to handle 90-MGD constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD "A--2" AGENDA ITEM #4 o "A-2" and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the wastewater effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for -this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are: 1. Two flow equalization basins, a flow distribution box, sludge pumping and associated valving and piping. 2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C", increase height of discharge channel and instal- lation of two additional grit chambers. 3. Approximately 430 feet of 108-inch diameter pipe to carry effluent flows,to the existing outfall booster pumping station. The proposed facilities would be constructed within the boundaries of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately three acres of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are those relating to construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the construction contract. The construction activity will take place ' within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction, there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened or endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical habitats will be affected by construction. The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175-MGD of flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date July, 1981) . The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975. During this period a number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved: "A-3" AGENDA ITEM #4 A-3 1. The 1977 Clean Water Act allows, under Section 301(h), for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification (lessening) of the secondary .treatment requirements. The Sanitation Districts 'have initially applied (September 20, 1978) for such a modification.' 2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of non-attainment area plans for designated. areas not currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently under review, and has not been adopted. 3. The Clean Water Act of 1972, under Section 208, mandates the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater Management Plants. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan is under review and has not been adopted. The Sanitation Districts have made the determination that this project will not result in any additional treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or' adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan. Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution at the Districts' offices to be available for public inspection and copying. PASSED AND ADOPTEI) at a special meeting held July 25, 1979. "A=4" AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-41, ADJOURNED SPECIAL Mtl:'11NU MEETING DATE July 25, 1979 TIME 5:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1 Districts' Administrative Offices DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS SCHUSTER?- - • • • SHARP • • • • • • • — —_ SVALSTAD)• • • • • ADLER. . . . . . — — YAMAMOTO - - - - .40ASO - - • • • • • • SS RILEY . . . . . . . . ANTHONY- - - - • •� IRILEY) . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . .— ��ICRANK - - - - - • - • HUTCHISON• • • •_7— _ MACALLISTER)- • BAILEY• • • ANTHONY) CLARK. . . . . . — DISTRICT Z PERRY • • • • • • • • CULVER• • • • •— GAMBINA)• • • • • • FOX• • • • • • • •— — NYBORG • • • FRESE• • • • • •— — FRIED)• • • • • • • • WEDAA - • • • • • •_ WARNER • • • • • GLOCKNER• - •_ — RASHFOR )• • • • • HOLT- - • • • - • . .— — CORBETT)• • • • • • GRAHAM• • • • • — ANTHONY . . . . . . CLARK. . . . . . . ._ RASHFORD)• • HOLT. . . . . . .— — GAMBINA . . . . . . FOX . . . . . . . . . — — WELLS3• • • • • • • • HOUSTON— -_ — WELLS)- - - • • • • • HOUSTON. . . . . ._ CRANK )• • - • • • • • HUTCHISON• - CULVER . . . . . . . PERRY. . . . . . . .— — — GAMBINA) • • • • • •LE BARON-— — GRAHAM . . . . . . . ROGET. . . . . . . ._ MANDIC) . . . . . . .MACALLISTER_ SEYMOUR). • - - - • ROTH - - - • • • • •— RYCKOFF) • • • • • •MC INNIS- • - HOYT) . . . . . . . . SMITH- - - • • • • •_ FINLAYSON) - - - •OLSON• • . . . ._ISVALSTAD). . . . . STANTON. . . . . ._ MACALL STER) • •PATTINSON- •— WINTERS). . . . . . VELASQUEZ- - • •_ CULVER • • • • • • •PERRY• • • • • -_ — WARD). . . . . . . . . YAMAMOTO • • • •_ GRIFFIN• • • • • •REESE• • • • • •— — ANTHON DISTRICT 3 iGRAHAM) . . . . . . •ROGET• • • • • •— SEYMOUR) • • • • - •ROTH• • • • • • •— NYBORG). . . . . . . FRESE. . . . . . . ._ EVANS)• - • • • • • -ROWAN- • • • • -- FINLAYSOI�l ). . . . OLSON. . . . . . . . HUMMEL) . . . . . . •RYCKOFF• • • •_ — SVALSTADJ. . . . .ADLER. . . . . . . ._ SCHUSTR)• - - - •SALTARELLI •_ MACALLISTER). .BAILEY ADLER. . . . . . . ._ �LASZLOE)��:: • - •SEITZ. . . . . ._PERRY). . . . . . CULVER. . . . . . . SCHUST • SHARP• • _ — CORBETT). . . . . . GRAHAM. . . . . , .— HOYT). . . . . . . . .SMITH• • • • • - GAMBINA� • : : • • •LE BARON. . . . . — — SVALSTAD). . . . . STANTON. . . .— GRIFFIN • - •REESE. . . . . . . ._ RYCKOFF3. . . . . . STRAUSS. . . .— — SEYMOUR) . . . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . .— ZOMMICK . . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . .— EVANS). . . . . . . .ROWAN. . . . . . . ._ — — GAIDO). . . . . .VARDOULIS. .— LASZLO)• . . . . . .SEITZ. . . . . . . ._ WINTERS) VELASQUEZ. .— — OMMICK.). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . .— NEELER) MAMOTO5 . -WARD. . . - - - -— — WHEELER). . . . . .WEISHAUPT. . . .— IED)• . . . - - - -WEDAA. . . - - - — ANTHONY . . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . . . - • . . .WEISHAUPT• .— — VELASQUEZ). . . .WINTERS. . . . . ._ (ANTHONY�• - • • - -WIEDER. . . - -— — WARD). . . . . . . . . YAMAMOTO. . . . .— (RYCKOFF • - - • • •WILLIAMS— SVELASQUEZ). • . .WINTERS. . . . DISTRICT 5 WARD). . . . . . . . .YAMAMOTO. . .— 44HUMMEL) . . . . . RYCKOFF. . . . . . OTHERS IRYCKOFF). - - . . . STRAUSS. . . . . . _ (ANTHONY). . . . . . RILEY. . . . . . . ._ — — HARPEP. . . . . . SYLVESTER . . �_ DISTRICT 6 LEWIS . - - - - - ✓ CLARKE • - - - • — (RYCKOFF). . . . . .MC INNIS. . . . . BROWN . . . . . . (CRANK). . . . . . . .HUTCHISON. . - - (RILEY). . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . . ._ WOODRUFF • • • DISTRICT 7 HOHENER • - • • — — HOWARD . . . . . _ — IHOYT)• - • • • • • •SMITH• - - • • • • •— _ HUNT . . . . . . . — RYCKOFF) • • • • • •WILLIAMS. . . . ._ — KEITH . . . . . . — — ANTHONY) • • • • • •CLARK• • • • KENNEY . . . - - WAHNER) • • • • • • •GLOCKNER• • • • •_ — LYNCH . . . . . . — — SCHUSTER) • • • • •SALTARELLI • • •— MADDOX . . . . . — GAIDO) • • • • • • • •VARDOULIS• • • •— — — MARTINSON . • — YAMAMOTO) • • • • •WARD• • • • • • • • — — E . .STEVENS TEVVENSENS . . . . DISTRICT 11 TRAVERS . . . . — — (MACALLISTER) . .PATTINSON. . . . SMANDIC) . . . . . . .MACALLISTER. .= _ IANTHONY) . . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . . F/13/74 MEETING DATE_ July 25, 1979 TIME_ 8_30 a.m 15TRICTS#1 SPECIAL County of Orange - Hall DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOA FDS o AdministFatign g SCHUSTER�• • • • • SHARP • •• •• • •_ (visor AnthonyPs Offieef YAMAMOTO • •• • . WARD . . . . . . . . _ _ SVALSTAD)- - - - -ADLER- - • • - -_ _ RILEY . .. . . . . . ANTHONY . . . . . � _ RILEY)• • • • • - • •ANTHONY• • • •_ 1✓ ICRANK�•• •• • • • • HUTCHISON• • • •_ hiACALLISTER)• -BAILEY• • •• • ANTHOPlY)• •- • • •CL ARK. .. . . . DISTRICT 2 PERRY)• • • •• - --CULVER• • - • •_ - GAMBINA)• •• • •• FOX- • • - - - - -_ SFRIED). . . . . . . . WEUAA • • • • • • •_ _ _ NYBORG�• • • - • -• FRESE- .. . . . _ _ IRASHFORp)• • • • . HEDAA . • • • • • • WAHNER • • • • • ••GLOCKNER- - •_ )) CORBETT)• •• • ••GRAHAM• • • --_ _ ANTHONY • • • • • • CLARK. . . . . . • •_ RASHFORD)- - • • -HOLT. . .. . . •_ _ GAMBINA • • • • • • FOX . .. . . .. . . WELLS)• • •• ••• •HOUSTON- - - -_ _ WELLS). . . . . . • • HOUSTON• • • • • •_ CRANK). . . .. . ..HUTCHISON• - CULVER . .. . . . . PERRY• • • • •• • ._ GAMBINA)• • • • ••LE BARON• •• GRAHAM • • . . .. . ROGET. . .. .. . . MANDIC) . . . . . . .MACALLISTER_ _ SEYMOUR). . . . . . ROTH .. . . .. • • RYCKOFF). .. . . .MC INNIS• • • HOYT) • • • • • •• SMITH. .. . . . • •_ FINLAYSON)• • ••OLSON.. . . . . _ SVALSTAD). . . . . STANTON. . . . ..— MACALLISTER) •!PATTINSON• - WINTERS)• • •• • • VELASQUEZ• • • •_ CULVER) - • ••PERRY•• • • • •_ _ (WARD). . .. . .. . . YAMAMOTO •• . • _ _ GRIFFIN)• • • • ••REESE.. . . .. _ _ DISTRICT 3 ANTHONY).. . . ..RILEY-• • • • •_ GRAHAM)• •• • • • .ROGET. . . . . . _ _ SEYMOUR)-• • • ••ROTH- • • • • • • SNYBORG). . . . . . . FRESE. . . .. . . ._ EVANS). . . . . . ..ROYlAN• • • • • •_ _ IFJNLAYSON(J). 1 . . OLSON. . . . . . . ._ HUMMEL). . . . . ..RYCI<OFF• • • •__._- _ (SVAI_STAD). •. . .ADLER. . . . . . . ._ SCHUST�R)- - - -.SALTARELLI•_ _ (MACALLISTER). .BAILEY. . . . . . ._ LASZLO • -• •SEITZ. . . .. .. (PERRY). . . . . .. . CULVER, . . . . . ._ SCHUSTER). . . . .SHARP. . . .. . _ (CORBETT). . . . . . GRAHAM. . ..... ._ HOYT). . . . . . . . .SMITH. .. .. . _ GAMBINA . . .. . .LE BARON. . .. . SVALSTAD). . .'. .STANTON. . ..-___ GRIFFIN • • • • • .REESE• • • • • • . • _ _ RYCKOFF). .. ...STRAUSS. .. ,— SSEYMOYR. . . . . . .ROTH• •• •• • . . . ZOMMICK)).... ..SYLVIA.. . ..— — (EVANS) • • •• • • •ROIVAN• • •• • • • •_ GAIDO). .: ..VARDOULIS•-_ 'SLASZLO)•• • •• -•SEITZ• • • • • • • • WINTERS) VELASQUEZ.._ (ZOMMICK. • : ::: :SYLVIA. • •• • • • _ YAMAMQTO5. . . ..WARD... .. . ._ (WHEELER . . .. . .WEISHAIJPT. . . . FRIED).. . . . . ..WEDAA. . . .. . � _ SSANTHONY . . .. . .WIEDER. .. . . . . WHEELER . . .. ..WEISHAUPT• . SVELASOUEZ). . . .WINTERS. .. . . . ANTHONY • • •• ••WIEDER• •• • • IWARD). . . ... . . .YAMAMOTO. . . . ._ RYCKOFF)))))• •• •••WILLIAMS-• •_ VELASQUEZ). . . .WFNTERS. . .._ DISTRICT 5 WARD). . . . . . . . .YAMAMOTO• • • �HUMMEL) . . . . . RYCKOFF. . . . . . _ _ OTHERS RYCKOFFS• • • • • • STRAUSS. . . . . ._ (ANTHONY)• • • • • • RILEY. . . . . . . .— HARPER . . . . . _I D SYLVESTER • • DISTRICT 6 _ LEWIS . . . .. . CLARKE • • • • • (RYCKOEEF)•• •• • •MC INNIS. . . . . BROWN . .. . . . CCRANK1• : : : :: ••HUTCHISON• •• •_ _ ((RILEY)). ANTHONY.. . .. . -_ WOODRUFF . . . DISTRICT 7 HOHENER . . . . HOWA.RD • • • • • ( HOYT)• - • • • • • •SMITH. . . . . . . ._ — HUNT . . . . .. . _ (RYCKOFF) • • • • • •WILLIAMS. .. .._ _ KEITH . . . . . . (ANTHONY). . . . . .CLARK• - • • •'• - -_ KENNEY . . . . . (WAHNER)• • • • • • •GLOCKNER. .. . ._ LYNCH . . . ... __— (SCHUSTER)• •• • •SALTARELLI • - -_ MADDOX • • • • • MARTINSON • • GA AMOT • • •• • •WARD. . . . . . • • • PIERSALL • • • 1'AI.1AMOT0) • • • • •WA RD• • • • • • • • •—._ — STEVENS . . . . DISTRICT 11 TRAVERS . . . . _ (MACALLISTER). .PATT:NSON. . . . MANDIC). . . .. . .MACP.LI_ISIER. . (ANTHONY) . . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . ._ 6/13/79