HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-07-25 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �,. AREA COODOE 714
S40-2910
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1
P. O. BOX 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927OB
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
July 23, 1979
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
DISTRICT NO, 1
WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1979 — .8:30 A,Ms
COUNTY OF ORANGE - HALL OF ADMINISTRATION
.10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
(CONFERENCE ROOM - SUPERVISOR ANTHONY"S OFFICE)
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
,r
I am calling a special meeting of the District No. 1 Board of
Directors at the above hour and date.
The purpose of this meeting is to consider an amendment to the
amended negative declaration on 75 MGD- Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include the Flow Equalization
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25),* to incorporate
additional information requested by the State Water Resources
Control Board.
/s/James B*. Sharp
James B. Sharp
Chairman
? u
' Jetr°'fay,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS s °' TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 4 0-2 91
9 1
o��,,�t 62-241 1
P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706
10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
,July
23 1979
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
DISTRICT N0, 1
WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1979 - 8:a0 ABM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE - HALL OF ADMINISTRATION
10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
(CONFERENCE Room - SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE)
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
_r
I am calling a special meeting of the District No. 1 Board of
Directors at the above hour and date.
The purpose of this meeting 'is to consider an amendment to the
amended negative declaration on 75 NGD- Improved Treatment at .
Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include the Flow Equalization
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), to incorporate
additional information requested by the State Water Resources
Control Board.
/s/James B. Sharp
James B. Sharp
Chairman
WARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California - 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
DISTRICT No. 1 9540
62-2-2411
96211
AGENDA
SPECIALMEETING
WEDNESDAY.$ DULY 25;' '1979 '8':30*•A,M,
COUNTY OF ORANGE HALL OF IbMINISTRATION
10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
(CONFERENCE ROOM - SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE)
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
(1) Roll call
(2) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tem
(3) Consideration of motion waiving- special meeting notice
requirements as provided for in the• Districts' Rules of
Procedure for Meetings .
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment
to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25. See page "A"
(5) Consideration of motion to. adjourn
RESOLUTION NO. 79-106
AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED
ti•.r� TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23, TO INCLUDE FLOW
EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO.
P2-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN
BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 21 31 51 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE• 75-MGD
IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 22 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED,
TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT
N0. 2, JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF
WHEREAS, in April, 1976, the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and
completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) and as a result of said study; declared that an environmental
impact statement was not required; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 of.Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, received, filed
and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved
Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a significant affect on the
environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency,
and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 61 7 and 11 of Orange County; California, on December 8, 1.976, adopted Resolution
No. 76-2062 _making a negative declaration re 75-MGD•Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 (Job No. P2-23); and,
WHEREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities
at Treatment Pl.ant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been
advised that the Environmental Protection Agency -is to amend their April 8, 1976
�..d finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2
(Job No. P2-25); and,
"A-1 It AGFNDA ITEM #4 "A-1"
WHEREAS, the Boards• of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
S, 60 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an
Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether
the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the
environment and has concluded that said project would not have a significant affect
on the environment and, therefore, the Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD
Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include
the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), pursuant
to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 32
S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution
No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 7S-MGD Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to further amend said negative
declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources
Control Board's CEQA Guidelines,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby
further amended to read as follows:
"Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein anf following,
it is*hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect
upon the environment:
The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an
interim project to improve and maximize the operation of
75410 of Improved Treatment at Plant•No. 2 to handle 90-MGD
constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD
"A-2" AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-2"
and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the: wastewater
effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for
L.rPt •this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are:
1. Two flow equalization basins, a flow distribution
box, sludge pumping and associated valving and
piping.
2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C",
increase height of discharge channel and instal-
lation of two additional grit chambers.
3. Approximately 430 feet of 108-inch diameter pipe
to carry effluent flows,to the existing outfall
booster pumping station.
The proposed facilities would be constructed within the boundaries
of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately three acres
of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are those relating to
construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the
construction contract. The construction activity will take place
within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction,
there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California
Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened
or endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical
habitats will be affected by construction.
The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure
designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175-MGD of
flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date July, 1981) .
The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS
on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975. During this period a
number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the
completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved;
"A-311 AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-311
1. The 1977 Clean Water Act allows, under Section 301(h) ,
for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification
(lessening) of the secondary treatment requirements. The
Sanitation Districts have initially applied (September 20,
1978) for such a modification.'
2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of
non-attainment area plans for designated. areas not
currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality
standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently
under review, and has not been adopted.
3. The Clean Water Act of 1972, under Section 208, mandates
the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater
Management Plants. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan is
under review and has not been adopted.
The Sanitation Districts have made the determination that this
project will not result in any additional treatment capacity at Plant
No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any
significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project
is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this
time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the
Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or
adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan.
Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on
behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 51 69 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California.
Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution at the Districts' offices to be
available for public inspection and copying.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting held July 25, 1979.
"A=4" AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-4"
e
t
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post'Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California - 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,. Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
DISTRICTo. 1 962-2-241 1
lit11 r�
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING
WEDNESDAY,''JULY 25'$1979 - '8':30- A,M
COUNTY OF ORANGE HALL. OF ADMINISTRATION
• 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
(CONFERENCE ROOM — SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE)
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA .
Y
. (1) Roll call • -
(2) oint nt of F A. H re
} Consideration of motion waiving- special meeting notice
'requirements as provided for in the* Districts' Rules of
Procedure for Meetings
( Consideration of Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment
to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25.' See page "A"
(5) Consideiation of motion to. adjourn S;'3Sr
RESOLUTION- NO. 79-106
AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED
TREA'111ENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23, 7.0 INCLUDE- FLOW
EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREA-DIENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO.
P2-25
A RESOLUTION OF 711E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN
BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE• 75-MGD
IMPROVED TREAD-LENT AT PLANT NO. 22 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED,
TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT
NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING- FOR NOTICE THEREOF
WHEREAS, in April, 1976, . the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and
completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) and as a result of said study; declared that an environmental
impact statement was not required; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 22 31
S,• 6, 7 and 11 of.Orange County, California, on December 8, .1976, received, filed
and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved ;
Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a significant affect on the .
environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency,
and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 31
S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County; California, on December 8, 1.976, adopted Resolution
No. 76-206, making a negative declaration re 75-MGD•Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 (Job No. P2-23); and,
%1EREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities
at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25) , and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been
advised that the Environmental Protection Agency -is to amend their April 8, 1976
finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2
(Job No. P2-25); and,
WHEREAS, the Boards* -of Directors of County -Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 20 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an
Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether
the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the
environment and has concluded that said project woukd not have a significant affect
on the environment and, therefore, the Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD
Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include
the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), pursuant
to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution
No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include- said Flow Equalization Facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and, '
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources
Control Board CSWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to further amend said negative
declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources
Control Board's CEQA Guidelines..
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby
further amended to read as follows:
"Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein an g following,
it is*hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect
upon the environment:
The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an
interim project to improve and maximize the operation of
75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant-No. 2 to handle 90-MGD
constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD
HA-2 11 AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-211
and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the; wastewater
effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for
-this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are:
1. Tw .flow equalization basins, a flow distribution
box, sludge pumping and associated valvi-ng and
piping.
2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C",
increase height of discharge channel and instal-
lation of two additional grit chambers.
3. Approximately 430 feet of 108--inch diameter pipe
to carry effluent flows.to the existing outfall
booster pumping station.
The proposed facilities wou-ld be constructed within the boundaries
of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately three acres
i.d
of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are. those relating to
construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the -
construction contract. The' construction activity will take place -
within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction,
there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California
Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened
or endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical
habitats will be affected by construction.
The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure '
designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175-MGD of
flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date July, 1981).
The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS
on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975'. During this period a
number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the
completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved:
►►A-3►► AGENDA ITEM i#4 ►►a-3►�
1. The *1977 Clean Water Act allows, under Section 301(h),
for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification
(lessening) of the secondary treatment requirements. The
Sanitation Districts 'have initially applied (September 20,
1978) for such a modification.'
2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of
non-attainment area plans for designated. areas not
' currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality
standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently
under review, and has not been adopted.
3. The Clean Water Act of 1972, under Section 208, mandates .
the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater
Management Plants. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan is
under review and has not been .adopted.
The Sanitation Districts have made the determination that this
project will not result in any additional treatment capacity acit at Plant
• r No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any
significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project
is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this
time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the
Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or'
adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan.
Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on
behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California.
Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution at 'the Districts' offices to be
�davailable for public inspection and copying,
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting held July 25, 1979.
"a'4" AGENDA ITEM #4
A-4 11
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post office Box 8127
OF Grange County, California - 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
f1 TRICT No. 1 962-241S962-211
AGENDA
SPECIAL•MEETING
WEDNESDAY,''JULY 25�..1979"_ '8'c 30••A,M.
COUNTY OF ORANGE-- HALL OF ADMINISTRATION
10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
(CONFERENCE ROOM — SUPERVISOR ANTHONY'S OFFICE)
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
(1) Roll call
(2) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tem
(3) Consideration of motion waiving- special meeting notice
requirements as provided for in the' Districts' Rules of
Procedure for Meetings
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-106, amending amendment
to negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-23, to include Flow Equalization Facilities
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25. See page "A"
(5) Consideration of motion to. adjourn
RESOLUTION NO. 79-106
AMENDING AMENDMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE 75-MGD IMPROVED
TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23, TO INCLUDE FLOW
EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO.
P2-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN
BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE• 75-MGD
IMPROVED TREADIENT AT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-23, AS AMENDED,
TO INCLUDE FLOW EQUALIZATION FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT
N0: 20 JOB NO. P2-25, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF
WHEREAS, in April, 1976, the Environmental Protection Agency undertook and
completed a study for a project designated as 75-MGD Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) and as a result of said study; declared that an environmental
impact statement was not required; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7 and 11 of.Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, received, filed
and approved an Environmental Impact Assessment declaring that 75-MGD Improved _
Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) would not have a significant affect on the
environment pursuant to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency,
and recommending a negative declaration therefor; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
51 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on December 8, 1976, adopted Resolution
No. 76-206, making a negative declaration re 75-MGD,Improved Treatment at Plant
No. 2 (Job No. P2-23); and,
WHEREAS, a subsequent study has been undertaken for Flow Equalization Facilities
at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), and the Districts' Chief Engineer has been
advised that the Environmental Protection Agency -is to amend their April 8, 1976
finding to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment- Plant No. 2
(Job No. P2-25); and,
"A--1" AGFNDA ITEM #l1 "A-1"
WHEREAS, the Boards* of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6,• 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore received and filed an
Environmental Impact Assessment prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether ]
the proposed Flow Equalization project might have a significant affect on the
environment and has concluded that said project would not have a significant affect
on the environment and, therefore, the Districts' negative declaration on 75-MGD
Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) should be amended to include
the Flow Equalization Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25), pursuant
to the determination of the Environmental Protection Agency; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, on July 11, 1979, adopted Resolution
No. 79-104, amending said negative declaration re 75-MGD Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-23) to include said Flow Equalization Facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-25); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent meetings with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) it has been deemed desirable to further amend said negative
declaration to comply with requirements set forth by State Water Resources
Control Board's CEQA Guidelines,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'That Section 3. of Resolution No. 76-206, as amended is hereby
further amended to read as follows:
"Section 3. That for the reasons enumerated herein and following,
it is*hereby found that said project will not have a significant affect
upon the environment:
The Flow Equalization Facilities, Job No. P2-25, are an
interim project to improve and maximize the operation of
75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant°No. 2 to handle 90-MGD
constant flow to remove an additional 44,000 lbs/day of BOD
"A--2" AGENDA ITEM #4 o "A-2"
and 28,000 lbs/day of Suspended Solids from the wastewater
effluent prior to ocean disposal. The required facilities for
-this project at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach are:
1. Two flow equalization basins, a flow distribution
box, sludge pumping and associated valving and
piping.
2. Increased pumping capacity at Headworks "C",
increase height of discharge channel and instal-
lation of two additional grit chambers.
3. Approximately 430 feet of 108-inch diameter pipe
to carry effluent flows,to the existing outfall
booster pumping station.
The proposed facilities would be constructed within the boundaries
of Treatment Plant No. 2 and would occupy approximately three acres
of the 105 acre site. The primary impacts are those relating to
construction and will be mitigated through specifications in the
construction contract. The construction activity will take place '
within the coastal zone; other than the short term construction,
there will be no other impacts to the coastal zone. A California
Coastal Commission development permit is required. No threatened
or endangered species, environmentally sensitive areas or critical
habitats will be affected by construction.
The Flow Equalization Facilities project is an interim measure
designed to maximize treatment and handle the existing 175-MGD of
flows to Treatment Plant No. 2 (project completion date July, 1981) .
The Sanitation Districts have been in the preparation of an EIR/EIS
on its Joint Treatment Works since 1975. During this period a
number of decision making factors have changed which will hold the
completion of the EIR/EIS in abeyance until these are resolved:
"A-3" AGENDA ITEM #4 A-3
1. The 1977 Clean Water Act allows, under Section 301(h),
for ocean dischargers to apply for a modification
(lessening) of the secondary .treatment requirements. The
Sanitation Districts 'have initially applied (September 20,
1978) for such a modification.'
2. The Clean Air Act of 1977, mandates the preparation of
non-attainment area plans for designated. areas not
currently meeting applicable national ambient air quality
standards. A non-attainment area plan (AQMP) is currently
under review, and has not been adopted.
3. The Clean Water Act of 1972, under Section 208, mandates
the preparation of Areawide (Non-point source) Wastewater
Management Plants. Currently SCAG's Areawide 208 Plan is
under review and has not been adopted.
The Sanitation Districts have made the determination that this
project will not result in any additional treatment capacity at Plant
No. 2 beyond the projected existing 175-MGD nor will it have any
significant adverse effects on the environment. Since this project
is an interim measure, no secondary impacts will be addressed at this
time. Secondary impacts will be addressed and mitigated in the
Final EIR/EIS, which will be completed after the resolution and/or'
adoptions of Section 301(h) permit, AQMP and SCAG Areawide 208 Plan.
Section 2. That this resolution is hereby adopted by District No. 1 on
behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California.
Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution at the Districts' offices to be
available for public inspection and copying.
PASSED AND ADOPTEI) at a special meeting held July 25, 1979.
"A=4" AGENDA ITEM #4 "A-41,
ADJOURNED SPECIAL Mtl:'11NU
MEETING DATE July 25, 1979 TIME 5:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1
Districts' Administrative Offices
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
SCHUSTER?- - • • • SHARP • • • • • • • — —_ SVALSTAD)• • • • • ADLER. . . . . . — —
YAMAMOTO - - - - .40ASO - - • • • • • • SS
RILEY . . . . . . . . ANTHONY- - - - • •� IRILEY) . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . .—
��ICRANK - - - - - • - • HUTCHISON• • • •_7— _ MACALLISTER)- • BAILEY• • •
ANTHONY) CLARK. . . . . . —
DISTRICT Z PERRY • • • • • • • • CULVER• • • • •—
GAMBINA)• • • • • • FOX• • • • • • • •— —
NYBORG • • • FRESE• • • • • •— —
FRIED)• • • • • • • • WEDAA - • • • • • •_ WARNER • • • • • GLOCKNER• - •_ —
RASHFOR )• • • • • HOLT- - • • • - • . .— — CORBETT)• • • • • • GRAHAM• • • • • —
ANTHONY . . . . . . CLARK. . . . . . . ._ RASHFORD)• • HOLT. . . . . . .— —
GAMBINA . . . . . . FOX . . . . . . . . . — — WELLS3• • • • • • • • HOUSTON— -_ —
WELLS)- - - • • • • • HOUSTON. . . . . ._ CRANK
)• • - • • • • • HUTCHISON• -
CULVER . . . . . . . PERRY. . . . . . . .— — — GAMBINA) • • • • • •LE BARON-— —
GRAHAM . . . . . . . ROGET. . . . . . . ._ MANDIC) . . . . . . .MACALLISTER_
SEYMOUR). • - - - • ROTH - - - • • • • •— RYCKOFF) • • • • • •MC INNIS- • -
HOYT) . . . . . . . . SMITH- - - • • • • •_ FINLAYSON) - - - •OLSON• • . . . ._ISVALSTAD). . . . . STANTON. . . . . ._ MACALL STER) • •PATTINSON- •—
WINTERS). . . . . . VELASQUEZ- - • •_ CULVER • • • • • • •PERRY• • • • • -_ —
WARD). . . . . . . . . YAMAMOTO • • • •_ GRIFFIN• • • • • •REESE• • • • • •— —
ANTHON
DISTRICT 3 iGRAHAM) . . . . . . •ROGET• • • • • •—
SEYMOUR) • • • • - •ROTH• • • • • • •—
NYBORG). . . . . . . FRESE. . . . . . . ._ EVANS)• - • • • • • -ROWAN- • • • • --
FINLAYSOI�l ). . . . OLSON. . . . . . . . HUMMEL) . . . . . . •RYCKOFF• • • •_ —
SVALSTADJ. . . . .ADLER. . . . . . . ._ SCHUSTR)• - - - •SALTARELLI •_
MACALLISTER). .BAILEY ADLER. . . . . . . ._ �LASZLOE)��:: • - •SEITZ. . . . . ._PERRY). . . . . . CULVER. . . . . . . SCHUST • SHARP• • _ —
CORBETT). . . . . . GRAHAM. . . . . , .— HOYT). . . . . . . . .SMITH• • • • • -
GAMBINA� • : : • • •LE BARON. . . . . — — SVALSTAD). . . . . STANTON. . . .—
GRIFFIN • - •REESE. . . . . . . ._ RYCKOFF3. . . . . . STRAUSS. . . .— —
SEYMOUR) . . . . . .ROTH. . . . . . . . .— ZOMMICK . . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . .—
EVANS). . . . . . . .ROWAN. . . . . . . ._ — — GAIDO). . . . . .VARDOULIS. .—
LASZLO)• . . . . . .SEITZ. . . . . . . ._ WINTERS) VELASQUEZ. .— —
OMMICK.). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . .— NEELER)
MAMOTO5 . -WARD. . . - - - -— —
WHEELER). . . . . .WEISHAUPT. . . .— IED)• . . . - - - -WEDAA. . . - - - —
ANTHONY . . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . . . - • . . .WEISHAUPT• .— —
VELASQUEZ). . . .WINTERS. . . . . ._ (ANTHONY�• - • • - -WIEDER. . . - -— —
WARD). . . . . . . . . YAMAMOTO. . . . .— (RYCKOFF • - - • • •WILLIAMS—
SVELASQUEZ). • . .WINTERS. . . .
DISTRICT 5 WARD). . . . . . . . .YAMAMOTO. . .—
44HUMMEL) . . . . . RYCKOFF. . . . . . OTHERS
IRYCKOFF). - - . . . STRAUSS. . . . . .
_
(ANTHONY). . . . . . RILEY. . . . . . . ._ — — HARPEP. . . . . .
SYLVESTER . . �_
DISTRICT 6 LEWIS . - - - - - ✓
CLARKE • - - - • —
(RYCKOFF). . . . . .MC INNIS. . . . . BROWN . . . . . .
(CRANK). . . . . . . .HUTCHISON. . - -
(RILEY). . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . . ._
WOODRUFF • • •
DISTRICT 7 HOHENER • - • • — —
HOWARD . . . . . _ —
IHOYT)• - • • • • • •SMITH• - - • • • • •— _ HUNT . . . . . . . —
RYCKOFF) • • • • • •WILLIAMS. . . . ._ — KEITH . . . . . . — —
ANTHONY) • • • • • •CLARK• • • • KENNEY . . . - -
WAHNER) • • • • • • •GLOCKNER• • • • •_ — LYNCH . . . . . . — —
SCHUSTER) • • • • •SALTARELLI • • •— MADDOX . . . . . —
GAIDO) • • • • • • • •VARDOULIS• • • •— — — MARTINSON . • —
YAMAMOTO) • • • • •WARD• • • • • • • • — — E . .STEVENS
TEVVENSENS . . . .
DISTRICT 11 TRAVERS . . . . — —
(MACALLISTER) . .PATTINSON. . . .
SMANDIC) . . . . . . .MACALLISTER. .= _
IANTHONY) . . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . .
F/13/74
MEETING DATE_ July 25, 1979 TIME_ 8_30 a.m 15TRICTS#1 SPECIAL
County of Orange - Hall
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOA
FDS o AdministFatign g
SCHUSTER�• • • • • SHARP • •• •• • •_
(visor AnthonyPs Offieef
YAMAMOTO • •• • . WARD . . . . . . . . _ _ SVALSTAD)- - - - -ADLER- - • • - -_ _
RILEY . .. . . . . . ANTHONY . . . . . � _ RILEY)• • • • • - • •ANTHONY• • • •_
1✓ ICRANK�•• •• • • • • HUTCHISON• • • •_ hiACALLISTER)• -BAILEY• • •• •
ANTHOPlY)• •- • • •CL
ARK. .. . . .
DISTRICT 2 PERRY)• • • •• - --CULVER• • - • •_ -
GAMBINA)• •• • •• FOX- • • - - - - -_
SFRIED). . . . . . . . WEUAA • • • • • • •_ _ _ NYBORG�• • • - • -• FRESE- .. . . .
_ _
IRASHFORp)• • • • . HEDAA . • • • • • • WAHNER • • • • • ••GLOCKNER- - •_
)) CORBETT)• •• • ••GRAHAM• • • --_ _
ANTHONY • • • • • • CLARK. . . . . . • •_ RASHFORD)- - • • -HOLT. . .. . . •_ _
GAMBINA • • • • • • FOX . .. . . .. . . WELLS)• • •• ••• •HOUSTON- - - -_ _
WELLS). . . . . . • • HOUSTON• • • • • •_ CRANK). . . .. . ..HUTCHISON• -
CULVER . .. . . . . PERRY• • • • •• • ._ GAMBINA)• • • • ••LE BARON• ••
GRAHAM • • . . .. . ROGET. . .. .. . . MANDIC) . . . . . . .MACALLISTER_
_
SEYMOUR). . . . . . ROTH .. . . .. • • RYCKOFF). .. . . .MC INNIS• • •
HOYT) • • • • • •• SMITH. .. . . . • •_ FINLAYSON)• • ••OLSON.. . . . . _
SVALSTAD). . . . . STANTON. . . . ..— MACALLISTER) •!PATTINSON• -
WINTERS)• • •• • • VELASQUEZ• • • •_ CULVER) - • ••PERRY•• • • • •_ _
(WARD). . .. . .. . . YAMAMOTO •• . • _ _ GRIFFIN)• • • • ••REESE.. . . ..
_ _
DISTRICT 3 ANTHONY).. . . ..RILEY-• • • • •_
GRAHAM)• •• • • • .ROGET. . . . . .
_ _
SEYMOUR)-• • • ••ROTH- • • • • • •
SNYBORG). . . . . . . FRESE. . . .. . . ._ EVANS). . . . . . ..ROYlAN• • • • • •_ _
IFJNLAYSON(J). 1 . . OLSON. . . . . . . ._ HUMMEL). . . . . ..RYCI<OFF• • • •__._- _
(SVAI_STAD). •. . .ADLER. . . . . . . ._ SCHUST�R)- - - -.SALTARELLI•_ _
(MACALLISTER). .BAILEY. . . . . . ._ LASZLO • -• •SEITZ. . . .. ..
(PERRY). . . . . .. . CULVER, . . . . . ._ SCHUSTER). . . . .SHARP. . . .. .
_
(CORBETT). . . . . . GRAHAM. . ..... ._ HOYT). . . . . . . . .SMITH. .. .. .
_
GAMBINA . . .. . .LE BARON. . .. . SVALSTAD). . .'. .STANTON. . ..-___
GRIFFIN • • • • • .REESE• • • • • • . • _ _ RYCKOFF). .. ...STRAUSS. .. ,—
SSEYMOYR. . . . . . .ROTH• •• •• • . . . ZOMMICK)).... ..SYLVIA.. . ..— —
(EVANS) • • •• • • •ROIVAN• • •• • • • •_ GAIDO). .: ..VARDOULIS•-_
'SLASZLO)•• • •• -•SEITZ• • • • • • • • WINTERS) VELASQUEZ.._
(ZOMMICK. • : ::: :SYLVIA. • •• • • • _ YAMAMQTO5. . . ..WARD... .. . ._
(WHEELER . . .. . .WEISHAIJPT. . . . FRIED).. . . . . ..WEDAA. . . .. .
� _
SSANTHONY . . .. . .WIEDER. .. . . . . WHEELER . . .. ..WEISHAUPT• .
SVELASOUEZ). . . .WINTERS. .. . . . ANTHONY • • •• ••WIEDER• •• • •
IWARD). . . ... . . .YAMAMOTO. . . . ._ RYCKOFF)))))• •• •••WILLIAMS-• •_
VELASQUEZ). . . .WFNTERS. . .._
DISTRICT 5 WARD). . . . . . . . .YAMAMOTO• • •
�HUMMEL) . . . . . RYCKOFF. . . . . . _ _ OTHERS
RYCKOFFS• • • • • • STRAUSS. . . . . ._
(ANTHONY)• • • • • • RILEY. . . . . . . .— HARPER . . . . . _I
D SYLVESTER • •
DISTRICT 6
_ LEWIS . . . .. .
CLARKE • • • • •
(RYCKOEEF)•• •• • •MC INNIS. . . . . BROWN . .. . . .
CCRANK1• : : : :: ••HUTCHISON• •• •_ _
((RILEY)). ANTHONY.. . .. . -_
WOODRUFF . . .
DISTRICT 7 HOHENER . . . .
HOWA.RD • • • • •
( HOYT)• - • • • • • •SMITH. . . . . . . ._ — HUNT . . . . .. . _
(RYCKOFF) • • • • • •WILLIAMS. .. .._ _ KEITH . . . . . .
(ANTHONY). . . . . .CLARK• - • • •'• - -_ KENNEY . . . . .
(WAHNER)• • • • • • •GLOCKNER. .. . ._ LYNCH . . . ... __—
(SCHUSTER)• •• • •SALTARELLI • - -_ MADDOX • • • • •
MARTINSON • •
GA AMOT • • •• • •WARD. . . . . . • • • PIERSALL • • •
1'AI.1AMOT0) • • • • •WA RD• • • • • • • • •—._ —
STEVENS . . . .
DISTRICT 11 TRAVERS . . . . _
(MACALLISTER). .PATT:NSON. . . .
MANDIC). . . .. . .MACP.LI_ISIER. .
(ANTHONY) . . . . . .WIEDER. . . . . . ._
6/13/79