Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-04-11COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 4, 1979 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS· Nas·.:·1~·· ·2., 3~ .. ·s>·s>·r &·11 . . . . WEDNESDAY.,· APRIL-11;· 1979 .. ~ 7·:·30 ·p·,M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY., CA~IFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled upcoming meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, April 24th and Tuesday, May 8th, at 11:00 a.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 25th, at 5:30 p.m. April May June July August September October November December January February March April COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX0127 10644 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962·2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITrEE MEETING DATES Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979 June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979 Aug 8, 1979 None Scheduled Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979 Oct 10, 1979 Oct 25, 1979 Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979 Dec 12, 1979 None Scheduled Jan 9, 1980 Jan. 23, 1980 Feb 13, 1980 Feb 21, 1980 Mar 12, 1980 Mar 26, 1980 Apr 9, 1980 Apr 23, 1980 ~~·-BOARDS OF DIRECTons ~~ w 'iounty Stsnitcltion Districts of OrtJnge County, California Post Offico Box 8127 ·10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: 1 JOINT BOARDS Area Coda 714 540-2910 962-2411 II AGENDA MEETING DATE APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION1 STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessa~y (4) Recognition of special guests 'W (5) Consideration of motion to receive and. file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda · .(6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: 4 District 1 March 14, 1979, regular District 2 -March 14, 1979, regular District 3 -March 14, 1979; regular District 5 -March 14, 1979, regular District 6 March 14, 1979, regular District 7 -March 14, 1979, regular District 11 -March 14, 1979, regular ......,,.. (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote ·differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS Fund "A'! and "C" Joint Operating -See page(s) ~--~~ ~~~~ Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 -NONE . DISTRICT NO. 2 -See page (s) DISTRICT NO. 3 _ See page (s) DISTRICT NO. 5 .-See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 6 _ NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 -NONE DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 (CC) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and· casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. · Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- -,_.. {W), (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J~4-2, authorizing an addition of $686.45 to the contract with equinox-malibu for additional work on handrail ·and painting on post-chlorination pipe, and granting a time extension qf 55 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "E" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-39, accepting Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue purcha~e orders for replacement of proprietary instruments at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 damaged by lightning storm for·a maximum amount of $25,000 plus tax and freight Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit proposals and issue purchase orders for portable buildings, installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appurtenances required for an operations and maintenance yard at the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon landfill site, for a maximum amount not to exceed $20,000 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, authorizing an addition of $15,119.00 to the contract with Triad Mechanical, Inc. , for relocation of power panel necessitated by a change in Southern California Edison Company requirements and for miscellaneous modifications in steel piping; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "G" Consideration of notion authorizing and ratifying action of General Manager re issuance of emergency purchase orders in connection with repair of main sewage pump No. 7 located at Headworks "C" for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000 Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks, Specification No. A-096, to ·Trans-West Ford for the total amount of $35,616.00; and rejecting alternate bid of Bob Johnson GMC as not in compliance with the specifications. See page "H" Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recom- mendation and awarding purchase in connection with Specification No. A-097 of two (2) 6-cylinder, manual transmission pickups, for the total amount of $10,205.68, and one (1) 8-cylinder, automatic trans- mission pick, for the amount of $5,779.12, to Bob Johnson GMC; and rejecting bids of Theordore Robbins Ford and.Fairview Ford as not in compliance with the specifications for said 8-cylinder pickup truck. See pages "H-2" and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) t,;;-. ~· • jL _, (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue purchase order for replacement of complete track and roller system on Districts' 1970 caterpillar front V end loader for an amount not to exceed $15,000 (j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of John Owings, dated March 23, 1979, in the amount of $717.09 for alleged damage to his cement mixer, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Steven Allan Simmons, dated March 24,1979, in the amount of $60.00 for alleged damage to his ·vehicle, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Robert D. Fatland, dated March26, 1979, in the amount of $181.75 for alleged damage to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts~ liability claims administrator for appropriate action (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to . issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 36928 to Clifford Forkert, increasing the total amount from $4500 to $5250 for additional engineering services required in connection with design of Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17 (n) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, changing the bid date from March 27 to April 3, and changing a connection from· the Districts' 6-inch water line to the City of Fountain Valley's 16-inch water main instead (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Advance Fire Protection Co., Inc., dated March 31, 1979, declining to do the work in connection with Job No. PW-070, Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Palnt No. 1, and rejecting their bid on the basis that the bid was received before (p) (q) Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were issued for additional work. See page ~'W" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-42, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for-Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, to R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. in the total amount of $19,749.00. See pages "J" and "K" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-40, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, reclassifying the position of Purchasing Super- visor (Range 1057B, $1607/$2000)to the position of Buyer (Range 10538, $1291/$1607). See page "L" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-41, amending Positions and Salarie~ Resolution No. 79-20, providing for an approx. 4.125% salary adjustme~ to two Instrumentation Division classifications effective March 9, 1979, pursuant to existing Memorandum of Understanding (At the March 14th mtg. the Boards declared their intent to make said adjustments effective March 9, 1979) Sec page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- ~. .. ~ (9) ,_ . ' (CONSENT CALE~DAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (r) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase (2.75%) to Districts' Operations Engineer, Bill Fox, from Range 1061G, Step 4.5 ($2508/mo.) to Step 5 ($2577/mo.) "in recognition of achieving his State registration as Chemical Engineer effective 4/20/79 DISTRICTS 1 & 6 (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-43, approving and authorizing execution of temporary construction and permanent Easement Deeds to the City of Costa Mesa in connection with construction of the Hyland Avenue Storm Drain at no cost to the City. See page "N" DISTRICTS 2 & 5 (t) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase and sale of approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at the current price of $28.00 per foot by District No. 2, for use in construction of the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-l, from District No. 5 (said pipe previously purchased by District No. 5 under Contract No. 5-20A) DISTRICT 2 . (u) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans (v) and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, specifying that the pipe to be furnished by the District has been manufactured in 18-foot lengths. Consideration of Resolution No. 79-44-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-l, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the amount of $189,970.00 .. See pages "0" and "P" (w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an addition of $5,914.96 to the contract with Christeve Corporation for changes in conditions not indicated on the plans, and granting a time extension of 75 calendar days for completion of the additional work. See page "Q" (x) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Subtrunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total increase of $12,415.50 to the contract with Christeve Corporation. See page "R" (y) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-45-2, accepting Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page . "S" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 (z) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $20,699.50 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for a change in paving requirements, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of additional work. See page "T" (aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $7,637.50 from the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. See page "U" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (bb) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-46, approving plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "V" DISTRICT 5 (cc) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Ilig Canyon Drainage Area sewage system END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- ·, --= .. (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, proposed amendment to the Santa Ana Wa:tershed Project Authority (SAWPA) agreement re deferred payment of supplemental treatment and capital replacement. costs (see Executive Committee report) (b) (1) Review of Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company (2) Consideration of motion approving Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program, in principle, and declaring that said Financial Plan and Revenue Program is in compliance with the intent of applicable regulations, and authorizing submittal of Financial Plan and Revenue Program to State Water Resources Control Board for approval (copy enclosed with agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplement~! agenda items, if any (14) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (16) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any . (17) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -7- (24) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions re Draft Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to file Notice of Completion of Draft EIR re Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (b) Consideration of motion establishing as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft . Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (to be determined by the Board) (c) Consideration of motion fixing at P .M. at as the date, time and place for public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (date, time and place ·to be determined by the Board) (d) Consideration of motion directing ~he staff to notice the residents along Bayside Drive of the District's proposed project advising them of the date, time and place of the public hearing on th~ Draft.Environmental Impact Report for the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (27) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda item~, if any (28) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- " -. BOARDS OF DJRECTOnS II County Snnitdtion Districts Post Office Box 8127 of O~ange County, California 10844 Ellis Ave nue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD, IN ADDITION) STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests '-sTRICTS 2 & 3 ITEMS ON -----'--SUPPL'EMENTAL AGENDA erpts, if any l (5) [ Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the followin g citi es regarding election of m~yors and appointment of alternates an? seating new memb e rs of the Boards: (*Mayor) City District Active Alternate Brea 2 Donald L. Fox Sal Gambina* 3 Melvin J. LeBaron . Sal Gambina* Buena Park 3 Lester J . Reese Don R. Griffin* La Habra 2 Earl C. Roget Beth Graham* 3 Beth Graham* Marion Corbett Stanton 3 Martha V. Weishaupt* Joseph M. Wheeler Yorba Linda 2 Henry W. Wedaa* Irwin M. Fried District 6 March 14, 1979, regular District 7 March 14, 1979, regular District ll March 14, 1979, regular lowing I &.. (7) ALL DISTRICTS l!JC.'-, ,µ (; Reports of: I \U v/l', / e. (a) Jo i nt Chairman f,v:cc . ~· (b) General ~l a n ager (c) Genera l Counsel meetings, -. (8) ALL DISTRICTS. Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ROLLCALLVOTE the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each \.,I .District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) · ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund -See page(s) Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 1 -NONE . DISTRICT NO. 2 -See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 3 -See page (s) DISTRICT NO. 5 _ See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 6 -NONE DISTRICT.NO. 7 -NONE DISTRICT NO. 11 -NONE "A" and "C" ~~~~ ~~~~ "A" and "C" "B" and "D" "B" and "D" "B" (9) ALL DISTRICTS Rolt Call Vote -or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS-NOS, .. 9 (A) THROUGH -9-<cc) All matters placed-upon the consent calendar·are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff .member, _or member of the .public in attendance, there ·_will :be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be ·enacted by one action_approving all.motions, and casting a unanimous ballot-for-resolutions included on the consent calendar. -All items ..remov.ed ·from the. consent calendar. shall-be considered ·-in the regular order .llf business. Members of the-public· ·who-wish-~to.-remove an item-from_:_the·~=-­ consent calendar ·shall, upon . .recognitioa-_by the ·chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * *"* * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. · Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. -2, Job No. J~4-2, authorizing an addition of $686.45 to the contract with equinox-malibu for additional work on handrail and painting on post-chlorination pipe, and granting a time extension of 55 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-39, accepting Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing· the General-Manager to negotiate and issue purchase orders for-replacement of proprietary instruments at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 damaged by lightning storm for· a maximum amount of $25,000 plus tax and freight (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit proposals and issue purchase orders for portable buildings, installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appurtenances required for·an operations.and maintenance yard at the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon landfill site, for a maximum amount not ·to exceed $20,000 (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I~IR, authorizing an addition of $15,119.00 to the contract with Triad Mechanical, Inc. , for relocation pf power panel necessitated by a change in Southern California Edison Company requirements ·and for miscellaneous modifications in steel piping; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "G" (f) Consideration of ootion authorizing and ratifying action of General Manager re issuance of emergency purchase orders in connection with···repair of main. sewage pump . .No . .7 located at Headworks "C" for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000 (g) Consideration of motion to receive_and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding-purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks, Specification No. A-096, to Trans-West Ford -for the·-·total amount of $35;616.00; and rejecting .alternate __ bid of Bob Johnson GMC as not in compliance with the specifications.· See-page "H" (h) Consideration of motion to receive and file· 'bid tabulation and recom- mendation and awarding purchase in connection with-Specification No. A-097 of two (2) 6-cylinder, manual transmission'-pickups~,--=for the total a_mount--:<>f-$-10,-205.68, and.one (1) -8-cylinder, automatic-trans- mission pick, for the amount.of $5,779.12, to Bob.Johnson -GMC; and rejecting bids of Theordore Robbins Ford and Fairview Ford as not in compliance with the specifications -for said 8-cylinder pickup truck. See pages "H-2" and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- -. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue purchase order for replacement of complete track and roller system on Districts' 1970 caterpillar front end loader for an amount not to exceed $15,000 (j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of John Owings, dated March 23, 1979, in the· amount of $717.09 for alleged damage to his cement mixer, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Steven Allan SiDDllons, dated March 24,1979, in the amount of $60.00 for alleged damage ·to his ·vehicle, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (1) .Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Robert· D. Fatland, dated -March 26, 1979, in the amotmt of $181. 75 for alleged damage to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to . issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 36928 to Clifford Forkert, increasing the total amotmt from $4500 to $5250 for additional engineering services required in connection with design of Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17 (n) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, changing the bid date from March 27 to April 3, and changing-a connection .from·the. Districts' 6-inch water line to the City of Fountain Valley's 16-inch water main instead (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Advance Fire Protect±on Co., Inc., dated March 31, 1979. declining to do the work in connection with Job.No. PW-070,.Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, and rejecting their bid on the basis that the bid was received before Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were issued for additional work. See page "W" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-42, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Fire Sprinkler System for·Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, to R & E Industrial _Fire Protection, Inc •... in the - total amount of $19, 749 ~ 00. See pages "J" and "K" --- (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-40, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution .No. 79-20, reclassifying the position of Purchasing Super- visor (Range 10578, $1607/$2000)to the position of Buyer (Range 1053B, $1291/$1607). See page "L" (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-41, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, providing for an approx. 4.125% salary adjustment to two Instrumentation Division classifications effective March 9, 1979, pursuant to existing Memorandum of Understanding (At the March 14th mtg. the Boards declared their intent to make said adjustments effective March 9, 1979) See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- -.. (9) (CONSENI' CALENDAR conti~ued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (r) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase (2.75%) to Districts' Operations Engineer, Bill Fox, from Range 1061G, Step 4.5 ($2508/mo.) to Step 5 ($2577/mo.) in recognition of achieving his State registration as Chemical Engineer effective 4/20/79 DISTRICTS 1 & 6 (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-43, approving and authorizing ·execution of temporary construction and permanent Easement Deeds to the City of Costa Mesa in connection with construction of the Hyland Avenue Storm Drain at no cost to the City. See page "N" DISTRICTS 2 & 5 (t) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase and sale of approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at the current price of $28.00 per. foot by District No. 2, for use in construction of the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-1, from District No. 5 (said pipe previously purchased by District No. 5 under Contract No. 5-20A) DISTRICT 2 (u) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, specifying that the pipe to be furnished by the District has been manufactured in 18-foot lengths. (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-44-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconnnendation and awarding contract for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the amount of $189,-970.00. See pages "0" and "P" (w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an addition of $5,914.96 to.the contract with Christeve Corporation for changes in conditions not indicated on the plans, and granting a time extension-of 75 calendar days for completion of the additional work. See page "Q" (x) Consideration of motion approving :Change 7 0rder.No . .-2 to the .plans . and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and -~chard (Kellogg) Subtrunk, -Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, -authori·zing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total increase of $12,415.50 to the contract with Christeve Corporation. See page "R" (y) Consideration -of Resolution No. 79-45-2, accepting Richfield Sub~Trunk and Orchard ·(Kellogg) Sub-trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "S" (CONSENT CALENDAR-continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 · (~) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $20,699.50 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for a change in paving requirements, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for. completion of additional work. See page "T" (aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to.the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $7,637.50 from the contract--wi th Kordi~k and Rados , J. V. See page "U" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (bb) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-46, approving plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "V" DISTRICT 5 (cc) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit / proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Big Canyon Drainage Area sewage system /] .1 p v p ~JJ,, (1).-11'/ ~ ~" _..\) \F~.~.Qi.--r r·'-END OF CONSENT CALENDAR ~·~" (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items del~ted from consent calendar, if any -6- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Cornrnittee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, proposed amendment to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) agreement re deferred payment of supplemental treatment and capital replacement costs (see Executive Committee report) (b) (1) Review of Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company (2) Consideration of motion approving Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program, in principle, and declaring that said Financial Plan and Revenue Program is in compliance with the intent of applicable regulations, and authorizing submittal of Financial Plan and Revenue Program to State Water Resources Control Board for approval (copy enclosed with agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (13) ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of General Coun se l at the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agenci e s' Attorneys ' Se minar on enforcement in St . Louis, Missouri, on April 4, 1979; an d authorizing r e imbursement of expenses incurred in connec tion the rewith (14) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn t 't '(16) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn f; q 5 (18) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (--~'f (20) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn f 07 -7- (2 2 ) DISTRICT 7 ..... Other l>u !;j ncss :ind communic;itions or r.upp l cmcnta l ag e nda it ems , if an y ITTMS OH .(22 -a) SUPPLEMENTAL AG ENDA Considc r:ition of Stand:ird Hc solution t\o . 79-·18-7 , ordering annex a tion of 1.170 a c res of tcrritol')' to tlt e Di s trict in the vicinity of the intersection of Plantcro a nd Vall e y Qu ail in Lem on ll ci p,ht s in th f' 11orth Tu s tin :irea, proposed Annexation No . 84 -Chou Ann c.>..ation to County S:rnit:ition llistrict No. 7 ITTM S ON (22-b) (1 ) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Report of Genera l Counsel on propos ed agreeme nt with City of Orange for col l ection of sch'cr connection charges (2) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unani mous Ballot Consider:ition of Resolution No. 79-49-7, approving agreement with City of Or a nge for collection of s ewer connection charge s, and rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7 Ordinance t\o. 705. See p:i ge "l" (Agreement in Dist. 7 Di rectors ' folders) ITTMS ON (22-c) SU PPLEMEN TAL AGENDA Consideration of items relative to prope rty located at 1701 Sirrine Drive, Santa Ana, Assessor 's Parcel No. 503-194-26, 1\'11ich is currenqy (23) outside the boundaries of District No. 7 and the 70th Sewer Maintenance District: (1 ) Conside ration of motion establishing a monthly sewer service fee in the amount of $30 until said property is annexed to the District. . (2) Consideration of motion estab li shing the annexation acreage fee and District annex a tion processing fee for said propertx at the rates in effect at the time the p roperty was connected to the sewer system in July, 1977. (Total fees due -$1,390.50) (3) Conside r a tion of motion authorizing credit of monthly sewer service fees ag ainst annexation fees payab le provided t hat ann ex ation proceedings are initiated with 120 days and applicab l e fees p a id. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to ad j ourn (2 4) DISTRICT 11 (25) (26) Other busi ness and commu n ications or s u pp l eme n ta l agenda i terns, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ '. 11 DI STR ICT 5 Consideration of actions re Draft Environmental Impact Report f or· Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer : (a) (b) (c) (d ) Consideration of motion authoriz in g the General Manager to fi l e Notice of Comp l etion of Dr aft EIR re Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer in accordance with the Ca li forni a Environme n tal Quality Ac t of 1970, as ame n ded ( Con side ration of motion est:iblishing i\.lt / '/ as the final date for which all comments must be r.c~eive d on the Draft Envi ronmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (to be determined by the Board) \ I' ,.,~u Consideration of mo t .ion fixing \\', lP at P .M. at \'v ~'") as the da c , time and place for public h earing on the Dra ft Env ironme nt a l Impact Report for B:iysidc Drive Trunk Se iver (date, time and p l ace to be dete r mined by the Board) Consideration of motion directin g the staff to notice th e r esidents alon g 13:iysidc Drivu of the llistrict 's p roposed project advisin g them of the date, time :ind ploce of the publi c hearing on the Draft Environ me nt al Impact RE'port for t he Bayside Drive Trunk Se 1..-er (2 7) nI STRICT 5 Other busines s and con nunications or supp lcmerit a l a genda items , if any (28) nJSTRl CT S Conside ration o f mo tion to adjourn -8- ' (S) /V'\lS •BOARDS OF DIRECT011S County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Ave nue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Te lephones: Area Code 71..C 5..C0-2910 962-2..Cl l AGENDA ADJOU RNMENTS POSTED .. ::- CO MP & MILEAGE ..... ~ •.• FILES SET UP ..... ~ ........... . ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFOR MATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPART MENI HEAD, IN ADDITION) STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROO M ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROO M, RES OLU1lOUS CERTli'IED .. ~ LErm:s 1·rn;Ti~tL ..........• MIN UTES WRITTEN .. ~ ••• MINUTES mrn ..... ~.- (1) Pledge of Alleg iance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointm ent of Cha i r me n pro t e rn, if necessary (4 ) Re cogni tion of specia l gu e sts ITEMS ON SUPPLEMEN TAL AGEND A Consid e r ation of mo t ion to r eceive an d fil e minute excerpts f r om t he foll owing c iti e s reg arding e l ect i on of mayors and appointment of alterna t es an~ seating new members of the Bo ards : (*Mayo r ) Distri c t Ac t ive Alte rnate ~rpts, if any Lowing me etings, ur.n1 ·-·--·~ Sa l Gam bina* Sal Gamb i na* Brea A/C .... TKlR •••• Buena Park La Hab r a SA Stanton Yorb a Linda 2 3 3 2 U.l!> L J:J.l..L J District 6 Di s trict 7 Don a l d L. Fo x Me lvin J. Le Ba r on . Lester J. Reese Ea rl C. Ro ge t Beth Gi~~~t 5a ~upt* Henry W. We daa* Don R. Griffin* Beth Graham * Marion Cor bet t ~·'t.~tr J oseph M. Whee l er Irwin M. Fried -·, --·-, --o ~ Ma r ch 14, 1979 , regul ar Ma rch 14 , 1979, regular District ll Marc h 14, 1979 , regu l a r (7) ALL DI STRICT S FILE --Re po r t s o f : LETTER ···--~ Joint Ch a irma n AfC .... TKlR ·-· ··-·-.. --Gen e r a l Ma na ge r .... _.. .. -··-···---·· ..... @ Ge ne ral Co uns e l (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll cal l vote motion r atifying payment of claims of ROLL CALL vorr __ the joint and individu a l Distr ict s as follows: (Each Director shall be called onl y once a n d that vote wi ll be regard ed as the same fo r each Distr ict represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to v ot e differently fo r any District .) AL L DIS TRICTS Joint Operatin g Fu n d -See page(s) "A" and "C" ~~~~--~~~~ Capital Outlay Revo l v i ng Fund -See page(s) "A" and "C" ~~~~--~~~~ DISTR I CT NO. 1 -NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 -See page(s) DI STR I CT NO. 3 _ See page (s) DISTR I CT NO. 5 _ See page(s) "B II DISTRI CT NO. 6 _ NONE DISTR I CT NO . 7 -NONE DISTRIC T NO . 11 -NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CON SENT CAL EN DA R ITEMS NO S . 9 (A) T HROUG H 9 (cc ) Al l ma tters p l aced -upon the consent calendar are considered as no t requirin g discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item i s requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the pub l ic in attendance, there wi l l be no separate discuss i on of these items . All items on t h e consent calendar wil l be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the con sent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shal l be considered in t he .regul ar order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent ca l endar-shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designat e by letter the item to be removed from the consent ·calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman wil l determine if any items are to be deleted from . ~ the consent calendar . (cc.) \~ ~ ~ s-~ ~ \ Q 1 ) Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FI LE •.•............... LETTER •............. A/C ••.. TKLR .... FILE .••.•...•••.•...•. ~~ ~-··· FILE •...............•. LETTER •..•..•..•...• t1~tf ... :::. FILE ···········-····· LETTER -·····-·--· A/C .... TKLR ·-· FILE -··········-·- LETTER ···--- A/C .... TKl R - ·-·-··-········-····-- -·--··············-.. - FILE ···-············· LETTER ··-········· A/C .... TK lJ .•.. ~l>..V. ....... . / dlW···-·-·- LETIER ·······- !l_C .... TKlj.]_ ~:.~ .. ~=--··- ~···-~··- LITTER ·········-- A/C .... TKL~~ ~~~·--~ ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2 , authorizing an addition of $686.4S to the contract with equinox-malibu for additional work on handrail and painting on post-chlorination pipe, and granting a time extension of SS calendar days for completion of said work. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-39, accepting Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement . See page "F" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue purchase orders for replacement of proprieta ry instruments at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 damaged by lightning storm for ·a maximum amount of $2S,OOO plus tax and freight (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit proposals and issue purchase orders for portable buildings, installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appurtenances required for -an operations and maintenance yar d at the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon landfill site, for a maximum amount not to exceed $20,000 (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-lR, authorizing an addition of $1S,119.00 to the contract with Triad Mechanical, Inc. , for -relocation of power panel necessitated by a change in Southern California Edison Company requirements and for miscellaneous modifications in steel piping; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "G" (f) Consideration of notion authori z in g ar.cl r at ifying action of General Manager re issuance of emergency purchase orders 1n connection with repair of main sewage pump No . 7 located at Headworks "C" for a maximum amount not to exceed $1S ,OOO (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks , Specification No. A-096, to Trans-West Ford for the total amount of $3S,6167 00; and rejecting alternate bid of Bob Johnson GMC .~s not in compliance with the specifications. See page "H" (h) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recom- mendation and awarding purcha se in connection with Specification No. A-097 of two (2) 6-cylinder, manual transmi ssion pickups, for the total amount of $10,20S.68, and one (1) 8-cylinder, automatic trans- mission pick, for the amount of $S,779.12, to Bob Johnson GMC; and rejecting bids of Th e ordore Robbins Ford and Fairview Ford as not in compliance with the specifications for said 8-cylinder pickup truck. See pages "H-2" and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSE NT CALE NDAR continued from page 3) 1'1(11 ................. . 1.E1TER .......... •· ~·~.: .. FILE •• _ ............ ) LEITER~~ .. A/C .... TKLR .... FILE _____ ....... _ LETTE~-­ A/C .... TKLR -· FILE ............ :-:_::..--,T- ~.W A/C .... TKLR -· FILE -··-··-····· LEnER ............. . A/C .... TKLR .. .. Qp.4~il:.~· FILE ... " .. ·-·--· LETT ER ..... ---··· A/C .... TKLR - FILE ........... 7 - @ .. ~ ..... .. A/C .... TKLR .. . ~ ... ~ ...... v ~-- A/C .... TKLR ~ ~,.Q.:~ .. - FI LE __ ....... .. LETTER ....... -- A/C .... TKLR - FILE ____ ........ LETTER .. ----·- A/C .... TKLR .... ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue purchase order for replacement of complete track and roller system on Districts' 1970 caterpillar front end loader for an amount not to exceed $15,000 (j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of John Owings, dated March 23, 1979, in th e amount of $717 .09 for alleged damage to his cement mixer, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Steven Allan Simmons, dated March 24,1979, in the amount of $60.00 for alleged damage ·to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Robert D. Fatland,-dated March26, 1979, in the amount of $181 .75 for alleged damage to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to . issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 36928 to Clifford Forkert, increasing the total amount from $4500 to $5250 for additional engineering services required in connection with design of Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17 (n) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, changing the bid date from March 27 to April 3, and changing a connection from the Districts' 6-inch water line to the City of Fountain Valley's 16-inch water main instead (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Advance Fire Protection Co., Inc., dated March 31, 1979, declining to do the work in connection with Job No. PW-0 70, Fire Sprinkler System for Exi sting Warehouse at Plant No . 1, and rejecting their bid on the basis that the bid was received before Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 were issued for additional work . See page "W" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-42, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse .at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, to R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. in the tota l amount of $19,749.00. See pages "J" and ''K" (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-40, ame nding Positions and Salaries Resolution No . 79-20, reclas sifying the position of Purchasing Super- visor (Range 1057B, $1607/$2000)to the position of Buyer (Range 1053B, $1291/$1607). See page "L" (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-41, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, providing for an approx. 4.125% salary adjustment to two Instrumentation Division classifications effective March 9, 1979, pursuant to existing Memorandum of Understanding (At the March 14th mtg. the Boards declared their intent to make said adjustments effective March 9, 1979) See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) Fttr-····-- LETTER ···-········· A/C .••. TKLR .••. (@.v.:. .... 7 .. ~-V······· A/C .•.. TKLR •••. FILE ····-··-·-··-· LETTER·····-·-- A/C .•.. TKLR -· FILE ................ .. LITTE R ............ .. A/C .... TKLR .. .. A /C ...• TKLR ·~ Q.:Jt.~ ... : ... FILE ···-·········-- LETTER ·····-····- A/C •... TKLR -· FILE ••. -·----·- LETTER ·······-··-· A/C •..• TKLR •••• FI LE ······-··-~/ A/C •..• TKL)\ ·/ ~~ . .:. ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (r) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase (2.75%) to Districts' Operations Engineer, Bill Fox, from Range 1061G , Step 4 .5 ($2508/mo.) to Step 5 ($2577/mo.) in recognition of achieving his State registration as Chemical En gin eer effective 4 /20/79 DISTRICTS 1 & 6 (s) Consideration of Resolution No . 79-43, approving and authorizing execution of temporary construction and permanent Easement Deeds to the City of Costa Mesa in connection with construc tion of the Hyland Avenue Storm Drain at no cost to the City. See page "N" DISTRICTS 2 & 5 (t) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase and sale of approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at the current price of $28.00 per foot by District No. 2, for use in construction of the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, from District No. 5 (said pipe previously purchased by Di s trict No. 5 under Contract No. 5-20A) DISTRICT 2 (u) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, specifying that the pipe to be f urnishe d b y the Di str ict has been manufactured in 18-foot lengths. (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-44-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the amount of $189,970.00. See pages "0" and "P" (w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authori z ing an addition of $5,914.96 to the contract with Christeve Corporation for changes in conditions not indicated on the plans, and granting a time extension of 75 calendar days for completion of the additional work. See page "Q" (x) Consideration of motion approving Change Drder No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Subtrunk, Contracts Nos . 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total incre ase of $12,415.50 to the contract with Christeve Corporation. See page "R" (y) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-45-2, accepting Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a No tice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See p age "S" (CONSENT CAL ENDAR ·continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) FILE - LffiER ••••.•••••• A/C •... TKLR ••• FILE ·······-·-·- LETIER ···········- A/C .... TKLR .... Q§>~L LETTER ·---- A/C .@ .. - -··-··············-· ..,...._ .................. . DISTRICT 3 · (z) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor , a portion of Reach 7 , Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $20,699 .50 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for a change in paving requirements, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of additional work. See page "T" (aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $7,637 .50 from the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. See page "U " DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (bb) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-46, approving plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "V" DISTRICT 5 ~Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Big Canyon Drainage Area sewage system (~~) END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items del~ted from consent calendar, if any -6-. . . (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Conunittee and consideration of motion to r ece ive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Exe cutive Committee: ~·"/ ~)!:_~·m (a) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, proposed A~_c ___ @_ .. ·.T •. K.-Llt·-·iY"··-M \ ( amendment to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (S AWPA) _ _ ~ agreement re deferred payment of supplemental treatment and capital replacement costs (see Executive Committee report) (2) ~-······-~-/ ~~-·- A/C ··@ ···y" {Y) IS Review of Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company Consideration of motion approving Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program, in principle, and declaring that said Financial Plan and Revenue Program is in compliance with the intent of applicable regulations, and authorizing submittal of Financial Plan and Revenue Program to State Water Resources Control Board for approval (copy enclosed with agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS ff\)£ (13) ITEMS O N FILE ~.1,1?.mM~NTAL AGENDA Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Ge n e ral Couns e l at the As sociation of Me tropol i tan Se werage Ag encies' Attorneys ' Seminar on enforcement in St. Louis, Missouri, on April 4 , 1979; a nd a uthorizing r e imbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewi th LET'° A/C .... KLR •••• ···············-··-·· ... (14) DISTRICT 1 --·····-------communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn <(? :u7 .(16) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~,·o '7 (18) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn y: v7 (20) DISTRICT 6 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTnICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:o/ -7- (2 2 ) 111 STRI CT 7 • Oth e r u11::;j 11 es s :rnd con1m1111ic;i tions or ~11pplemeD~J} ag e nda items , if any tTEM S OH (22-a) Consideration of S t and:.iru Rc~o luti on t\o. 79-~7. orue ring annc-xation of SUPPLEMEN TALAGENDA v/ 1.1 7 0 acre s o f territ ory t o th e Di s trict in th e vicinity of th e int ersection f!L E ·····,;la¢ M{S of P l ant e ro :.incl ~:illey Q1'.ai l in Le111on ll ci~hts in tlw 11orth_·1 us~in area,_ W.V't proposed Anncx:it1on No. 8·1 -Chou Annexation to County Sanitation lhstr1ct ~c .... t~1 ~-~-<;b t ~No . 7 ~~~~~~:· ~ ITE MS ON (22-b) @ Report of Gener:i l Counsel on proposed agreement with City of Oran ge SU PPLEMENT~MD,lr ······· for collection of sei.·e r conn ec tion charges 9FllE ---;_--;;··/ (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79 -'t.~7, approving agreement with City of Orange for collection of sewer connection charge s , and Roll Call Vote or Cast A/C .... TKLR -Una nimo us Ballot rn Js rescinding Agreement Jmplementing County Sanitation Di s trict No. 7 ···-·-··-·-- (2 2-c) ~--·~····-· C!§~n:~~ ,tr) ls A/C .... TKLR ••.• (23) (24) (25) (26) FILE ·······-··-··-· ~st ... ~ A/C .... TKLR -· Q~---~ Q~ ... -.. :::::. FILE ···-·····---- Ordinan ce No. 7 0 5. Sec p:ige "1'' (Agreement in Dist. 7 Directors ' folders) Consideration of items relative to property loc~ted at 1701 Sirrine Drive , Santa Ana, Assessor's Parcel No. 503-1 94-26 , whjcl1 is currenqy outsid e th e boundaries of District No. 7 and the 70th Sewer Maintenance District: (1 ) Con s id e ration of motion establ ishing a month l y sewer service fee in the amount of $30 unti l said property is annexed t o the District . (2) Consideration of motion estab l ishing t h e annexation acreage fee and District annexa tion processing fee for said property at the r ates in effect at the time the property was connected to the sewer system in July, 1977. (Total fees due -$1 ,390.50) (3) Consideration of motion authorizing credit of monthly sewer service fees ag:iinst annexation fees pay able provided th a t annexation proceedings are initiated wi t h 1 20 days and applicab l e fees paid. DISTRICT 7 Co n s idera t ion of mo tion to a djourn ~; 0.9 DISTRICT 11 Ot her bu siness and communicat ions or suppl emental agenda items , if any DISTRIC T 11 Consid e ration of motion to ad jou rn ~·, D '1 DISTRICT 5 Consi d e ration of actions re Draft Environmental I mpact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer: (a) Co n siderati on of mo t ion authorizin g the Genera l Mana ge r to fil e Noti ce of Comp leti on of Draft EIR r e Ba)'side Drive Trunk Sewer in acc ord a nc e with th e Californ ia En vironme n tal Qua l it)' Act of 1 97 0 , as am e nd e d Con siderati on of motion establishing ~\ :;- fin a l d ate for wh ich all comme n ts mu stbc'ci vcd on th e Environme nt a l I mp:i c t Report for Bays id e Drive Trunk Sewer (t o be determined by the Board) as the Dr aft ___ ............. -.. -(c) Con sidera t ion of motiop fixing ~ 1$ at 1 :3-o P .M. FILE-···--/ at N ~~~as the d c , time and place for public Q~ ?? h earing on the Dr a ft Envonme nta l l mp a ct Re p o rt for Baysid e Ori ve / LE TTE ---T(r_,.~~~~,!~r~~.'~,~~m~-~~ .pl ace to bC' determined by the Board) A/C .... TKtR -.v-r~ ·-'-""'''\:)~~~ '"""'"~) . / -·-··-······-··-·-(d) C o n ~id e ration of 1no t~ on d i :ectin g the ~taf~ to notice th e liJ...o ~~ _>J r e s~~~nts a l ong B:iy s 1dc l ln v~· of the Dist.n ct ' s propo~ed pro ?e c t ~ -~ct ad vis 1nr. them of th e <l :ite, time and pl :.ic e of the public h e arrng on th e Dra ft Enviro n me nta l I mpact Repor t for th e Bayside Dr i v e Trunk S e wer ~nI STR lCT S 1 ,.,0tl.{c r husin ess and corrnnun ~c:.i t ions or supp l ement a l agen<la it.em s , i f ;my ~C!J-~,Q_~ (28) nrsTRTCT 5 -' --~ Con s ide rati o n of mo tj on to adjourn ~: / 3 -8- I . BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II County San it4ti on Oi5tricts of Orange County, Cal iforn ia DISTRICTS 2 & 3 JOINT BOARDS SUPPLE MEN TAL AGENDA ITEMS APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M. . Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-24 11 AGENDA (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following cities regarding e lection of mayors and appointment of alternates and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) City District Bre a 2 3 Buena Park 3 La Habra 2 3 -!\ n Stanton 3 Yorba Linda 2 ALL DISTRICTS Active Donald L. Fox Melvin J. LeBaron Lester J. Reese Earl C. Roget Beth Graham* Martha V. Weishaupt* Henry W. Wedaa* Alternate Sal Gambina* Sal Gambina* Don R·. Griffin* Beth Graham* Marion Corbett Joseph M. Wheeler Irwin M. Fried (13) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of General Counsel at the Association of Met ropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Attorneys' Seminar on enforcement in St. Louis, Missouri, on April 4, 1979; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith DISTRICT 7 (22-a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-48-7, ordering annexation of 1 .170 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the intersect ion of Plantero and Valley Quail in Lemon Heights in the north Tustin area, proposed Annexation No. 84 -Chou Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (Item #22 continued on page 2) ,. .... --~~ DISTRICT 7 (continued) (22-b) (1) Report of General Counsel on proposed agreement with City of Orange for collection of sewer connection charges (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-49-7, approving agreement with City of Orange for collection of sewer connection charges, and rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7 Ordinance No. 705. See page "I" (Agreement in Dist. 7 Directors' folders) (22-c) Consideration of items relative to property located at 1701 Sirrine Drive, Santa Ana, Assessor's Parcel No. 503-194-26, which is currently outside the boundaries of District No. 7 and the 70th Sewer Maintenance District: · (1) Consideration of motion establishing a monthly sewer service fee in the amount of $30 until said property is annexed to the District. (2) Consideration of motion establishing the annexation acreage fee and District annexation processing fee for said property at the rates in effect at the time the property was connected to the sewer system in July, 1977. (Total fees due -$1,390.50) (3) Consideration of motion authorizing·credit of monthly sewer service fees against annexation fees· payable provided that annexation proceedings are initiated with 120 days and applicaple fees paid. -2- ..... _., ........ , ' ..,..~ .. -----~ RESOLUTION NO. 79-48-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ORANGE FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES AND RESCINDING THE EXISTING AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ORDINANCE -NO. 705 WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •. WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 enacted Ordinance No. 705 providing for :rules and regulations relating to connections to District sewage facilities, establishing charges therefor; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 and the City of Orange made and entered into an agreement dated July 18, 1962, which provided for, among other provisions, the collection of connection charges imposed by County Sanitation District No. 7 pursuant to Ordinance No: 705, as amended; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 and·the City of Orange have determined that the terms and conditions of the presently-existing agreement are no longer in the practical best interests of the respective parties, and, therefore, desire to rescind said agreement and re-enter into a new and different agreement setting forth the intent of the parties as of this date; and, WHEREAS, the City of Orange has approved the agreement for collection of .the sewer connection charges as proposed by County Sanitation District No. 7; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 does hereby resolve: Section 1. That certain agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A"V providing for the collection of sewer connection charges by the ·" 1-1" AGENDA ITEM #22(s)(2) -DISTRICT 7 "l-1". r.-.• --=· City of Orange, is hereby approved, to be effective April 11, 1979. Section 2. That the General Manager, the District Chairman and Secretary, and the General Counsel are all instructed and authorized to prepare and execute all necessary documents required to implement the provisions of Ordinance No. 716 of County Sanitation District No. 7 pertaining to the establishment of sewer connection charges and to implement the provisions of the above-referenced agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. II 1-2" AGENDA ITEM #22(B)(2) -DISTRICT 7 "1-2"· T fMNAGER 'S AG ENDA REPORT County Sanitatio n Districts -of Orange County, California JOI NT BOARDS Meeting Date APRIL 11 , 1979 -7:30 P.M . Post Offi ce Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708 To le phones: Area Code 71 4 540-29 10 962-2-411 The followin g is a brief exp l anation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on th e e nclosed agenda and which are n ot otherwi se self-explanatory . Warrant lists are enc l osed with the agenda material summari z ing the bills paid since the l a st Joint Bo ard meetin g . To minimi ze the amoun t of redundancy a nd duplication in the agenda material a nd reduce the number of comments in the Manager 's Report, we h ave expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda it se lf , particularly with regard to change ord ers and con- trac ts which have been pub li c ly bid and are within the contract budget or e n gineer 's est imate. Detailed change orders are included in th e supporting materia l as ~ell as the bi~ tabulations for the co ntracts b e ing recommended for award. J oint Boards No. 9 -a -Ch a n ge Order No. 1 -Chlorin ation Facility Refurbish - me n t at Treatment Plant No . 2, Job No. J-4-2 . This change ord er is for additiona l work on the existing hand - r ai l at thi s fac ility as well as addit i ona l painting on the po st - chlo r ination pipe . Th e staff recommends app rova l of this change order in the tota l add amount of $68 6.45, plus the approval of the time exten s ion o f 55 calendar days . No. 9-b -Accept a nce o f Job No. J-4 -2 -Chlorinat i on Facili ty Refur bis hm ent at Treatment Plant No. 2 . . The contractor has complet e d all the work and contractu a l obligations for the r efurbi shme n t of this Chlorination Facility a t Tre atment Plant No . 2 . The staff recommends acceptance of th e work, execution of the Fina l Cl oseout Agreemen t, ·a nd the filing of th e n ecessary Notic e of Compl e tion. (Tot a l contrac t, $1 38 ,186.45). 9-c -Replacement of Recording In struments Damap,ed b y Lig htening Ma rch 14th. On J a nuary 30, 19 79 , we suffered mod erate dama ge to several r ecording and transmitting instrume n ts at Treatment Plant No. 2 du e to a l i g ht ening strike . These instruments were partially re- p a i red by the Districts ' instrument r e pair g r oup u sing stocked repl acement components. On March 14, 1979, we had a second occurrence on the 100 p a ir cable connecting Plants 1 and 2 . This apparently was more severe and r es ulte d in extensive damage to instruments in both P l ants. - Our inst rum ent rep air group i s p ro ceeding with bench repairs as well as installation of protective dev ices on these critical in strument l oops . However, since the necessary repair components are of a propr i etary nature , it i s anticipated that we wi ll exceed the $4,500 limit established in the Districts' purchas ing resolution. Th e staff is recommending that the Gener a l Manager be auth orized to ne gotiate and i ssue purchase orders to several suppliers for the procurement of th ese rep air and replacement componen ts not to exceed $25,000 plus tax and frei gh t . No. 9-d -Portab le BulldinR . Fencing and Appurtenances for Coyote Canyon Land fil l Sludge Processing. Th e Districts expect to move onto the Coyote Canyon landfil l sludge processing site in the near future. At that time , we wi ll n eed a portable lunch/locker building and materials storage shed . Also, chain link yard fencing as requi red in the operating permits. It is an tici pated that a ll of the necessary units can be obtained in conformance with the Districts' approved standard purchasing practices . However, in the even t that more than one item is furnished by the same supplier, i t is possible that th e $4,500 limit wi ll be exceeded . The staff i s recomme nding that the General Manager be autho - ri zed to solicit proposals and is s ue purchase orders for portable b ui l dings, installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appur - tenances require d for the operations and ma i ntenance yard at Coyote Canyon l andfi ll sludg e processing s ite in an amount no t to exceed $20,000. No. 9-e -Ch ange Order No. 1 to Job No . I -lR, Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station. Tri ad Mechanical, Inc., the Con tractor for this rehabilitation work, had to r e lo cate the power panel due to a lack of space in the area origina ll y shown on th e p l ans . This rel ocation was r e quired bec ause of the Edi son Company 's safety orders. This chan~e order a l so covers the necessary miscellaneous modifications in stee l piping and equipment due to the equ i pment changes, as well as a time ex tension of 20 calendar days . The staff recommends app roval of this change order in an amount of $15,11 9 and a time extens i on of 20 calendar days. -2- No . 9-f -Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Sewage Pump. On Thursday, March 15th, one of the Di stricts ' l arge 30-inch (45MGD) raw sewage pumps , located at Plant No. 2 Headworks, had a mech ani cal failure which required extensive machine-shop type repair work, including the making of a comp l ete new shaft. Due to the urgency , it was decid ed (with the c oncurrence of the Joint Chairman), to proceed with the machine shop work on an emergency basis . Quotations were obtained from two local machine shops to make the new shaft and repair the backing plate and bearing housing . The low quote fo r this work is approximately $8,500 (it may vary sligh tly due to amounts of material actua lly us ed). They estimated that the work could be completed in 14 to 20 days -(Th e factory est imated 1 8 -20 weeks). Th e total estimated cost fo r thi s repair is $15,000 with all o ther parts (b earings, wear rings, s eals , etc.) obtained through the District s ' no rma l purchasing procedures . The Staff is request- ing r at ificatio n of the General Manager 's action in this mat ter. No. 9-g & h -Purchase of Two 9-Yard Dump Trucks and Three Picku Trucks (2 Six-C linder, Manua l Transmissions and 1 Ei ht-cy inder, Automatic Transmission . The responsible l ow bidder for the dump trucks is Trans-West Ford, Font ana, in the amount of $35,616 and the lowest responsible bidder for the pickup trucks is Bob Johnson GMC of Long Beach in the amo unt of $15,984.80. The s t aff recommends authorization for pur chase of the vehicles. No. 9-i -Rep air of Front End Loader. Th e Districts' 1970 966 Caterpillar front-end lo ader is out of service due to needed replacement of the complete track and roll er system. It is requested that the staff be authorized to negotiate and award a p u rchase order contract f or the r epair n ot to excee d $15,000. Proposals will be solicited fr om a ll known sources by the Purcha s ing Division. No. 9-j, k, & 1 -Denyin g Claims for Dama ges. Th ree damage claims have been recieved. The staff recommends they be d e nied and referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator for approp riate act ion . -3- No. 9 -m -Approval of Change Order to Purchase Order to Cl ifford Forkert in Connection with En ineerin for Di ester C eaning Beds at Plant No. 1 . Clifford Forkert, a licensed surveyor, a.ssisted the staff i n the preparation of plans and specifications for the Under Drain System for Di ges ter Cleanin g Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No. P l-17, whose work included engineering and surveys of the existing bed area. Services in addition to those origina l ly re - quest ed were r equire d to complete the work which resulted in the t otal compensation exceeding the $4,500 limi t a uthoriz ed in the Districts ' purch as ing re solution . The staff recommends approval of a $750 increase to this purchase order , making the total amount of this work $5,250. No. 9 -n -Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW -0 70 . The staff is requesting approval of Addendum No. 1 to this contract which ext ends the date of receipt of bids from March 27, 1 979 to April 3, 1979 in order to issue a subsequent addendum cl arifying adequate pressures for wate r services. The staff also requ ests approval of Addendum No . 2 to this contract which delet es a connection to the Districts ' 6-inch wate r main as originally specified a nd instead connects to the City of Fountain Valley's 16-inch steel water line in Ellis Avenue. This chan ge is nec essary to insure adequate water pressure for the fire protection system. This addendum also holds the contractor respon - s i bl e for all labor and materials, meter charges, application fees and inspection fees as well as permits from the City o f Fountain Va l ley . The staff recommends approval of these two addenda . No. 9-0 -Award of Contract No . PW-070 -Fire Sorinkler Svstem f or Exi s ting War ehouse at Plant No . 1 . On Tuesday, Apri l 3rd, bids were r eceived for the automatic s p rinkl er system for the existing ware house facilities at Plant No . 1. Eight bids were received which included a bid inadvertently opened by the staff from a contractor who h ad requested withdrawal of his bid submitted February 27th. The bid did not acknowledge Addend a Nos . 1 and 2 calling for a connection to the City water main in Ellis Avenue . Th e staff recommends rejection of the bid of Advance Fire Protection Company, Inc. (Item 9 (o) (1). The seve n rema ining bids ranged from a l ow o f $19,749 to a h igh of $34,400. The staff recommends award of the contract to -4 - R & E Indust ria l Fire Protec tion , In c., o f Ve ntur a (Item 9(o) (2). This proj ect has been discussed wi th this c ontractor and he is a ware of a ll provisions contained there and i s satisfied with his bid (Engineer's estimate -$1 9,000). No. 9-p -Purchasing Divi sion Po sition Reclassifications. During the past few years, the Districts ' purchasin g and warehousing functions have been reorganized and the activities centrali zed under the new position of Procurement and Property Chief. Recently, our Purchasin g Supervisor retired after 20 years \vi th the Districts. The staff now r ecomm ends that the position of Purchasing Supervisor (Range 10 57B , $1607/$2000) be reclassified to Buyer (R ange 1053B , $1 291/$1607) to reflect a realignment of respon - sibilities and compl ete the reorganiz ation . No. 9 -q -Amend~ng Positions and Salaries Resolution re In strumentation Divis ion. Pur suant to the Memorandum o f Understanding executed with the Op erations and Ma intenance personne l in JRnua ry, 1 979, the staff has been meeting and conferring with the OC EA representatives r e l ative to the realignmen t of those instrumentation classifications which are not competitive paywise with comparable positions in other s ewe r age agencies within th e State . As a result of a job valida - tion study, we determined that two classifications in the instru- mentation division were 4 .125% under the averag e of the seven agencies s u rveyed; Lead Instrumentation Man and the Journeyman p osition , Instrumentation Technician II . Four District personnel will be affected by this adjustment. Last month, the Boar d declared its intent to make any adjust- ments effec t ive March 9th. The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No . 79-41 providing for a salary adjustment for these t wo classifications of 3/4 Range (4.125%). No. 9-r -Grant ing 2.75% Salary Adjustment to Operations En gineer . The Districts ' Operat i ons Engineer has jus t received notice of his State registration as a Chemical Engineer . In recognition of his achievement, I am re commend ing that he receive a one -half step increase (2. 75 %) within his salary range, effective April 20th. Di stricts 1 and 6 No. 9-s -Approval of Temporary Constru c~i on Easement and Pe rmanent Storm Drain Easement to the City of Costa Mesa , from Di stricts 1 and 6, for Construction of Hy land Avenue Storm Drain . The City of Cost a Mesa, in conjunclion with the County Flood -5- Co n t r o l Distr ict, is co n structing a storm dr ain in t h e proposed Hyl a n d Avenue norther l y of the San Diego F reeway and wester l y of Harb or Boulevard . The alignment traverses the fee easement j ointly own ed by Districts Nos. 1 and 6 . This easement was orig ina l ly owned by District No . 1 which conveyed 16~ feet of the 20-foot easement to District No. 6. This action appearing on the agenda g r ants a permanent storm drain easement and a temporary construction easement to the City for the storm drain that wil l be in the n ewly p roposed Hy l and Avenue . The staff recommends approval of these easements to the City of Costa Mesa at no cost . Di stricts 2 and 5 No. 9 -t -Sale of District No. 5 24-Inch Ductile Cast Iron P ipe to District-No . 2 . The staff is recommending the purchase of approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at the curr ent price of $28/foot by Di strict No . 2 from District No. 5 for use in con - str uction of the Olive Subtrunk Siphon. The Olive Subtrunk repair i s required as a result of dam age caused by last year's heavy s t orm flow in the Santa Ana River . District No. 5 purchased approximat e ly 10,000 feet of pipe originally for the Back Bay Drive sewer construction; hcwever, the State Coastal Comm ission overruled the Regional Coastal Commi ssio n and a permit was not i ssued . The District No. 5 Board then d ec lared the pipe surplus. Th e District 5 Board is cont empla ting the inst a llation of 3100 feet of pipe for replacement of a portion of the Baysi de Drive Sewer. The sale of 550 feet of pipe to District No. 2 wi l l not affect this project. District 2 No . 9-u -~pproval of Addendum No . 1 to the Plans a nd Speci- fications for th e Olive Subtrunk Repair, Contract No . 2-5R-l . The staff is requesting approval of this addendum which specifies that the pipe being furnished by the Di strict has beeu man u factured in 18-foot len gths . The staff recommend s approval of this addendum which clarifies the plans . No. 9 -v -Award of Job No . 2-5R-l -Olive Subtrunk Repair . ---- Bids were r ece ived on March 27th for th e Olive Subtrunk Repair, Job No. 2-5R-l . 'I"wo bids were received for th is work ; $189 ,970 and $225 ,005. (En g inee r 's estimate -$173,000). The staff r ecommends approval and award of this job to the lowest responsib l e bidder, John A. Artukovich Sons, I nc . We expect to rec e ive $79,000 from the Federal Disaster Office. The District is repl acingt:lle~ washed out gra vity line with u deep siphon. The Federal Disast er office will only fund replacement of wl1at was lost. -6 - - No . 9-w & x -Ap~rova l of Change Orders Nos. 1 an d 2 to Contracts Nos. 2-19 an 2-20 -Richfield Subtrunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Subtrunk . This contract for the construction of the Richfie l d Subtrunk and Orchard (Kellogg ) Subtrunk, which was awarded in June, 1978, is now complete. Chan g e Order No. 1 includes three changed con - ditions not correctly s hown on the plans . On Contract No . 2 -19, an excess ively large water line thrust block necessitated the r e lo cat i on of the Contractor 's tunnel pit , and a 36-inch gas main was incorrectly shown on the plans, necessitating a modification ·to the pipe alig nment. On Contract No . 2-2 0, an 8-inch PVC irrigat ion line was encountered which was not indicated on the p l ans . The tot a l additional amount to the Contr act was $5,9 1 4 .96. Additiona ll y, th ere is a time extension of 75 calendar days on this change order cov e ring the time reouired to complete the chanQ.ed conditions. and for inclement weather , as wel l as for delays in procurement of pipe. Ch ang e Order No. 2 to these contracts is a n adjustment of engineer's qua ntities increasing the cont~act by $1 2 ,415.50, cover- ing an increase in 54-inch casing and an increase i n 27 -i nch VCP, a deduct in 27-inch VCP with a different bedd i ng requirement, and sewer supports, and an addit ion of four feet o f a 60-inch manhole. The staff recomm e nds approval of these change orders. No. 9 -y -Acee tance of Con tracts Nos. 2-19 and 2 -20 - Richfiel d SubtrunI< an Orchar d Ke o g g Subtru n . ~ Th e contractor has completed a l l the work an d contractua l obligations for the Richfie l d Subtrunk and Or char d (Kellogg) Subtrunk . The staff recommends acceptance of the work a nd execu - tion of the Final Cl oseout Agreement as well as the fil ing of the nece ssary Notice of Completion. Di strict 3 No. 9-z and aa -Change Orde r s Nos. 5 a nd 6 t o Contract No . 3-20-3 -Kno tt Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7. Ch ange Order No. 5 to this contract adds $20,699.50 to the contract an d is f or correction of excessive pavement damage beyond t he contract limits specified. This dama g e was caused b y the age of the ex i s ting pavement and it i s the r esponsib ility of the Dis- trict to corr ect pavement de fici e ncies. Thi s change order also includes the placement of a one -inch aspha lt over l ay a long Knott Avenue from curb to curb, which was necessitated due to varying condit ions of the r oad surface . Chang e Order No. 5 a l s o provides f o r a time exten sion of ten c a l endar days . -7- Change Order No. 6 is the adjus t ment of engineer's qu ant ities for this p ro ject and decreases the total contract am ount by $7,637.50. The staff r ecomme nd s approva l of both Ch a n ge Orders Nos. 5 and 6 . Di strict s 5 a nd 6 No. 9-bb -Approving Pl ans and Specifications for Santa Ana Rive r Siphon, Con tract No. 5 -21 . Th e d esign engineer has completed the design of the se cond barre l of the Santa Ana River Siphon which is scheduled to be con - structe d in conjunction with the widening of th e Santa Ana Ri ver by th e County Flood Control District. The staff i s recommending approval of the plans and specifications and the sol ici ting of com - p e ti ti ve bids. The bi d date for this project will be established to coincide w·i th the time commitments required by the EMA for the River widening project. (E ngineer 's estimate -$350, 000) . Th e Coastal Commission construction permit has been issued for the project . Dis trict 5 No . 9 -cc -Au thorization to Solicit Proposals for Engineering Services r e Big Ca n yon Drainage Area . Because of the necessity to proceed with the implem e ntation o f either the replacement and rehabilitation of the J amboree Pump Station or the grav i ty tunnel in J amboree Bouleva rd to accommodate the Big Canyon Dr ainage Area, the staff is recomme nding that Requests for Proposals be sent to responsible engineering firms to proceed with the d e sign of the selected a lt erna~ive . (STAFF NOT E : This a gen d a it em wil l be removed from the co nsent cal endar and considered by the District No. 5 Board under Agenda Item No. 27 n ext Wednesday, April 11th). All Districts No s . 11 and 1 2 -Repo rt of th e Exe~utive Co mmi ttee. The Exe cutive Committee met on March 28th and a report of th eir discussi on s and recommendations is included for active Dir ectors. No . 26 -Draf t EIR for Rep l acement of a Portio n of t h e Bayside Dr ive Trunk Sewer. At th e March Board meeting, th e Directors were presented with a dra ft c opy of th e Environmental Im pact Report (EIR) for considera- tion at this meeting. In ord e r to comply with the CEQA rcquirem~nts, th e Dir ectors should estab li sh a final date by which a ll comme nts -8- must be received, and f i x a time and p l ace fo r public hearing on th e proposed project. I ncluded in your agenda materia l i s a recommended invitation to all r es id ents directly affected by construction in Bayside Drive . The staff suggests that h ea ring notification to the residents may prove beneficia l to b oth th e District 's staff and the City's staff in establish ing the construction req u irements for this project . Fred A . Harper General Manager -9- ENERGY BECOME PART OF THE SLUDGE MANAGEMENT TEAM. LA/OMA PROJECT APRIL 20, 1979 10:00 A.H. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts 1955 Workman Hill Rd. Whittler, Ca. 90607 (213) 699-7411 ·Mo1aq uo1~e~o1 a4~ ~e ·w·e 00:01 'oz ll~dV Sn NIOr 3SV3ld TLW:pj 6/14/78 1/10/79 1/25/79 2/07/79 l a s ' 6 6 ' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ~24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3.2 RE: AGENDA ITEM #22Cs)(2) AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES --COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7 AND CITY OF ORANGE THIS AGREEMENT. is made and entered into this '11th day of April 1 1979, by and between the CITY OF ORANGE, ------~----------- .a municipal corporation, hereinafter· referred to as "Cityu, and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District." "W I T N E S S E T H : ,__, --. _. ~ -~ -._ 't-' WHEREAS, District has, by the enactment of Ordinance No. 705, . as amended, established a schedule of sewer connection charges; and . WHEREAS, a 11 or a portion of the impro·ved territory of the District is within the city limits of City; and . WHEREAS, the Cit_y, by and through ·its Buildi!19 Department, regulates all new construction with the City; ~nd WHEREAS, it is for the mutual benefit of C·ity and District that the sewer connection charges provide~ for in said Ordinance No. 705, as amended, of the District be collected in a manner most expedient and least burdensome for the owners of property within the City; and WHEREAS, the City will benefit by the construction and maintenance of sewage fac111ties of the District within the city limits of City by.Dis~rict from the funds to be collected from said sewer connection charges;· and WHEREAS, City and District have heretofore. on the 18th day of July, 1962, ente~ed int~ an agreement for the collection of District sewer funds, and the parties hereto have ~greed to terminate said contract as of the date set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties as follows: 1. City and District, for and in consideration of the EXHIBIT "A-1" 1 2 3 4 6 • 6 'I ·a 9 10 11 12 13 ·14 15 . i i - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .' 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3.2 payments which have already been made upon said or~ginal c~n­ tract, and for and in consideration of the further covenants and agreements herein set· .forth, now agree that this agreement shall be substituted in place of and instead of said original agreement dated July 18, 1962, and said agreement fs hereby expressly terminated • 2. City, as agent, will and does hereby ~gree to issue permits and collect the ~harges established by District under said Ordinance No. 705, as amended, from time to time. 3. District shall prescribe those classifications of charges to be co1lected by City, 4. City will account for the charges co"ll ected i\nd· remit to.District monthly, the moni~s collected~· except as provided in Section 7 hereof. 5. Procedures mutually agreeable to City and District shall be established for collection and remittance of said fees. 6. District does hereby appoint and nomihate City and its agents and employees (as the same may be designated by City) as agents of the District for purposes of issui~g permits and determining and collecti~g the sewer connection charges es- tablished under Ordinance No. 705, as amended. This does not authorize City to act as agent for the General Manager or to perform the duties of the General Manager of the District or· •,· to act on behalf of the District, except·.as expressly set forth in this agreement. .. 7. City· agrees to act as ~gent for District as herein provided for a fee equal to five (5%) percent of the fees collected by City for permits issued pursuant to the provisions of this agreement. Said five (5%) percent fee of City shall be deducted from the charges collected by City and to be re- mitted to District pursuant to Section 4 herein. EXHIBIT "A-2 11 ··-· . ,. ~ -;: ., ;::._~ ~. 1 8. City agrees to prepare and submit to District a detailed 2 accounting statement of the fees collected thro~gh the effec- S tfve date of this agreement under the previous agreement 4 executea the 18th day of July, 1962. and agrees to pay that 5 sum to District within thirty (30) days after the date of 6 this agreement, provided that such sum shall ha.ve deducted 7 therefrom the sum described herein to be paid to City by 8 District for the outright purchase of trunk sewer lines nos. 9 1 and 4 and sums due for the purchase of capacity rights in 10 trunk sewer lines nos. 2. 3 and 5. Any interest earned on 11 the deposits of District held by City duri~g the duration of 12 the previous agreement shall be retained by ·.and deemed vested· 13 solely in City. The earned intetest to be credited to City is 14 15 determined to be the fair and equitable reimbursement of City monies expended for the construction of the sewer lines which 16 are the subject of this agreement, 1? 9. All sewer lines ~escribed herein have been constructed 18 · .. by City at its sole expense in accordance with the Master Plan 19 of Trunk/Subtrunk Sewers of District, both as to size and 20 location. The sale price to District shall be equal to the 21 original cost of construction of each of t·he trunk sewers. 22 City agrees to sell and District agrees to purchase in 23 accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth 1 all of the· ·.'24 right, title and interest in t.runk sewer lines nos. 1 and 4, 25 as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part 26 hereof as though fully set forth herein. 27 As to trunk sewer lines nos.· 2, 3 and 5, as more particularly 28 29 30 31 :i2 described in Exhibit "A", the City agrees to sell and District ~grees to purchase sewer capacity rights in City's trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5. Said sewer capacity rights shall be equivalent and equal to that amount of sew~ge and industrial waste that is presently being discharged into trunk sewer lines EXHIBIT "A-3." 1 nos 2, 3 and 5, as of the date of the execution of this 2 agreement. 3 Provided, however, that the purchase of such capacity rights 4 in trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 shall give no person, 6 firm or entity, public or private, any right to use or to 6 connect to trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 without the consent 'I 8 ·9 10 11 of City. Nor shall the purchase of capacity rights in sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 permit any person, firm or public or private, to increase the amount of sewage or which can be placed in trunk sewer 1 ines nos. 2, 3. and the total amount of sew~ge or effluent bei~g discharged trunk entity, effluent 5, over into 12 trunR sewe~ lines nos. ~. 3 and 5.as of· the date of the execu- 13 tion of this agree~ent, except as· City may in the future consent 14 to any such increase. 15 10. The transfer of ownership from City to District of the 16 three trunk sewers described as items nos. 2, 3 and 5 on 1'1 ·Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and the two trunk sewers described 18 ·~s items nos. l and 4 on Exhibit· "A'', att'ached her~to, shal 1 19 be 1n accordan.ce with the following provisions: 20 A. District shall, within thirty (30) days of the execution 21 of this agreement, purchase from City, and City shall sell 22 trunk sewers nos. 1 and 4 as said lines are identified on 23 Exhibit 11 A0 , .• attached hereto and made a part hereof as though i -24 fully set forth herein. · . . 25 · B. The aforementioned trunk sewers nos. 1 and 4 shall be 26 purchased by the District for the total sum of $280,796,35, 27 which represents a total of $203,740.35 for trunk sewer line 28 no 1, and $77,056.00 for trunk sewer line no, 4, 29 30 C. Within thirty (30) days of execution of this ~greement, City shall sell and District shall buy capacity rJghts in 31 trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 for a total sum of 3.2 $115,952.02. This $115,952.02 sum represents 90.00% of the EXHIBIT "A-4 11 .-,. M' ·-• ,, lr •• ... 1 a 3 ' 6 • 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 · 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 : 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sl 3.2 capacity rights of trunk sewer line no. 5 and 30.20% of the capacity rights of trunk sewer lines nos 2 and 3. The 90.00% ~apacity rights of trunk sewer line no. 5 represents 90.00% of the capital cost of $54,575.00 and is thus calculated to be $49,117.50 of the $115,952.02 sum. The remaining $66,834.52 sum represents 30.20% of the $221,306.35 capital cost and thus 30.20% of the capacity rights fn trunk sewer·lines nos. 2 and 3, and is based on 30.20% of the Master Planned drainage area being within Sanitation District No. 7 boundaries as of November 1, 1978, representi~g 30.20% of the Master Planned sewage flows. Beginning July 1, 1979, and ea~h succeeding July 1, the District shall pay the City (or acquisition of additional capacity rights in trunk.sewers lines nos. 2 and 3 based on the total acres annexed within the Master Planned drainage area in the precediilg year times $143.70, 'for a· subtotal amount of payments in this Subsection C not to exceed the capital cost of $221,306.35 of. trunk sewer lines nos. 2 and · 3 •. Provided, however, City will sell to District all right, title and interest in trunk sewer lines nos; 2~ 3 and 5 no later than July 1, 1998, with the City reserving the e~press right to tender the sale to District at any time prior to said date. O. City shall be responsible for the maintenance of trunk· sewer lines nos. 2 and 3 duri~g s~ch time as ownership remains wit.h City and capacity rights only ar.e granted to District. Upon execution of this agreement, District shall be solely re- sponsible for maintenance of sewer line no. 5, inasmuch as 90.ooi of the capacity rights .in sewer 1 ine no. 5 are being transferred to District pursuant to this agreement. 11. District and City agree that ff the City is presented with a dispute as to the validity, reasonableness, enforcibilfty, or applicability of the charges agreed .to be collected by it for EXHIBIT "A-5" 1 the District and the City shall .notify the District of the prob- 2 lem. and the District shall take over the collection and enforce- 3 ment of its ordinances in subject cases. It f s contemplated that 4 this shall be the procedure for serious disputes made upon some 5 current legal right or basis as distinguished from crank-type 6 or ill-founded disagreements. f 12. City shall not be liable to the District for its unin- 8 tentional and inadvertent failure to collect a connection charge ·9 actually due District or its unintentional or inadvertent mis- . 10 calculation of the amount of the charges, fees or fees due 11 District. 12 13. District hereby agrees to hold.City free and harmless of 13 any and all liability that ~ight a~ise if any such fees collected ·14 by City shall be determined to have been illegall~ collected. 15 14. District ~grees to·provide legal services in the defense 16 1'1 18 19 20 21 22 23 of any action seeking to collect sewer connection fees alleged to have been illegally coJle~ted. IN WIJNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation By~~ Mayor ATTEST: ~ i'teut4a: /)/. C}-!;no:t;--.-1 c l.(C- City Cl erk i/ ' APPJOVED AS TO FO~~ ,4 24 ~/Nta41J~~. ~iii Attorney 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 II COUNTY SANITATlON DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA BY~.,..._--~~__,,..~~~._......-------~-----~---C ha i rma n, Board of 01rectors By~=-~~~---~---_,_--...........___..__..~~~~--- S e c re tar y, Board of D1rectors ·. Counse EXHIBIT "A:..6" ·-. -- u .-~ c;::, '-:.' ~ :--, O"""'' ... '• . ! I April 10, 1979 MEMORANDUM TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS FROM: DON WINN, DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF S~ITATION AGENCIES (CASA)· RE: CASA SPRING MEETING -MAY 4-5, MARRIOTT HOTEL, NEWPORT BEACH The spring meeting of the California Association of ·sanitation Agencies (CASA) is scheduled for May 4-5 in Newport Beach. The Managers and local agency Directors' Committees have scheduled numerous agenda items for discus- sion Friday afternoon, some of which will be a fellow up on items from their January meeting, such as: 1. The results of the survey on· costs of sewer services and, 2. Proposed amendments to the Porter Cologne Act regarding Regional Board procedures Since. CASA is meeting in Orange County, it is an ideal opportunity for many of our Directors to participate in the meeting. Attached is a tentative agenda. The President's Reception is a good opportunity to meet Directors from other California agencies. As a member of CASA's Board of Directors, I invite your participation. Donald D. Winn Attachment " CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF .SANITATION AGENCIES SPRING MEETING Friday, Hay 4, 1979 10:00 a.m. 12:00-5:00 p.m. 12:30-1:00 p.m. 1:00-4:00 p.m. 1 1:00-4:00 p.m. 4:00-5:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 5, 1979 8:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. 8:30 a.m. 9:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 12:00 noon 1:00 p.m. Harriott Hotel, Newport Beach HAY 4-5, 1979 A G E N D A ------ Registration Attorney's Committee Meeting Executive Committee Meeting Manager's Conunittee·Meeting Director's Committee Meeting Program and Conference Arrangements Committee President's Reception Continental Breakfast Associates Committee Breakf as_t Meeting Registration General Session Break Luncheon Continuation of General Session to Adjournment Work Schedule Distribution: Joint Chairman 1 Attorney ~ ./ Administration Y Engineering 5 Maintenance 6 Operations 4 JCE 3 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 WORK SCHEDULED FOR WEEK· OF APRIL 16, 1979 Department 30 -Projects/Plant Maintenance 1. Chlorine rotation of both Plants. 2. Continue sludge drying operation, Plant 1. 3. Place concrete foundation for polymer tank, Plant 1. 4. Continue remodeling of RMC building. 5. Build concrete pad for sandblasting compressor, Plant 1. 6. Repair railings at rectangular basins, Plant 2. 7. Install blocks for draining of B basin. 8. Cut ceiling joist f~r AC ducts (Administration building). 9. Finish installing acoustical tile in Administration building. 10. Continue emptying sludge bed, Plant 2. 11. Start painting at Foster building. 12. Paint desk at Plant 2 Control building. Department 40 -Trunk Maintenance 1. Remove two depth recorders from the District 2 Cont, 2-14-1 and 2-14-3 trtmks. 2. Line clean District 11 Lake Avenue and Atlanta Sub trunks. 3. Line clean District 7, County Property. 4. Bolt down the manhole covers on cont. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5 and 2-9. 5. Station maintenance where needed. Department 50 -Mechanical Maintenance 1. Scheduled maintenance, both Plants. 2. Continue repairs on No. 7 M.S.P. 3. Continue rebuilding No. 6 M.S.P. engine. 4. Repairs to No. 2 truckling filter at Plant No. 1. Department 60 -Electrical Maintenance 1. Instr1D11ent damage repair. 2. Ellis controls. 3. Administration building tough plate lighting. 4. Outfall electric switch gear maintenance. Department 80 -Laboratory 1. Industrial waste ammonia project. 2. Sediment collection. 3. Bacteriological completed test. INSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT Plants J-3-1 J-6-lG Installation of Gas Engines at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station Sheet Metal for Roofing at Ocean Outfall Booster Station J-7-3B Replace Air Conditioning Administration and Engineering Building I-lR Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station PW-061 Installation of Gas Mixing Compressors PW-064A Plant Air Compressor PW-066 -1 Modifications of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports, Plant No. 1 PW-068 . --.. - PW-070 PW-072 New Ram Tables at Plant No. 2 Interim Sewage Sludge Facility Site Preparation at Coyote Canyon Warehouse Fire Sprinklers Modifications to Existing Launders at Secondary Clarifiers at Plant No. 1 Laboratory Bench and Fume Hood Addition, Plant No. 1 Apri l 16, 1979 Contracf signed by Pascal & Ludwig. Most of the sheet metal has been installed on Foster. Working on a contractor for roofing and stucco. yob should be complete in two weeks. Problems encountered installing weir in Bushard line. Unable to accomplish due to high flows . Plans and specifications complete . Bid date: May 1, 19 79 . Compressor delivered 3/29/79. Not all support equipment delivered at this time. Plans and specifications being prepared. Tentative bid date: May 1, 1979. Plans and Bid date: Work under specifications complete. May 1, 1979 . progress.-~~ /))/1 --~~~~~~--~ Contract awarded April 11, 1979. Plans and specifications prepared. Bid date: May 1, 1979. Plans and specifications being prepared. ~NSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT· Plants (Continued) Pl-17 Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Plant No. 1 · P2-1R-2 Rehabilitation of Clarifiers P2-23 P2-23-2 P2-23-3 P2-23-6 A, B, and C at Treatment Plant No. 2 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 Oxygen Equipment Electrical Reliability Major Facilities April 16, 1979 Plans and specifications complete. Bid date: May 1, 1979. specifications Shop drawings being reviewed. Equipment being delivered. Engine generators tested. Con- tractor working on punch list items. Plant Water Pum;e Station: Contractor placing 36" plant water feed. Slab at elevation 11.0 has been placed. Primary/Effluent Pump Sta·tion: Backfilling to elevation 5.50. Pipe supports at elevation 7.0 for 72" discharge pipe are being placed. ESSPS and WSSPS: Beam at elevation 10.50 at south end of ESSPS has been poured •.. ·Aeration· Tanks·: 3% of walls have Compressor Room: 12.0 is in place. around building. Approximately been poured. Slab at elevation Backfilling Waste Sludge Thicken·ers: Placing perimeter forms for grade slab. 84-Inch Primary Effluent: Continue backfilling over pipe. 84-Inch P.E. Distribution: Approximately 70 1 of pipe installed. Contractor to begin backfilling and replacing concrete slab. · Clari·fiers: Approximately 50% of rebar for grade slab in place. Rebar for east wall in place. Approximately 25% of grade slab concrete in place. • CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT Districts 2-SR-l 3-13-1 3 -20-3 3-20-4 Olive Sub-Trunk Repair Westminster Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7 Knott Interceptor, Reach 8 Santa Ana River Siphon April 16, 1979 Low bidder was John A. Artukovich and Sons, Inc., Azusa , California. Work scheduled to begin in summer . Line tests completed from Seal Beach Boulevard to Bolsa Chica Street. Work to start at inter- section of Bolsa Chica Street and Westminster Avenue this week . Paving, median curbs and junction structures at Orangethorpe remaining to be completed. Work on tunnel at Fullerton Creek Channel suspended due to high infiltration. 42-inch R.C.P. under construction north of Fullerton Creek Channel. and specification approve 11, 1979. Tentative bid May 8, 1979 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0 . BOX 8127, FOUNTA I N VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 E LLI S AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEG O FREEWAY) April 4, 1979 D R A F T To: All Interes t ed Parties Subj ect: Public Hearing for Bayside Trunk Draft EIR Sanitation District No . 5 of Orange County has developed a project r eport and a Dra ft Environmen tal Impact Repo rt (EIR) for the replacement of a trunk sewe r in Bayside Drive generally located between El Paseo Drive a nd Dahlia Avenue. A public hearing will be held concerning t he Draft EIR at Newport Beach City Hall Council Chambers on at p .m. The District 's sewer line now serving the area is badly d eteriorated , and h as broken on several occasions. I t is a 10-inch cast i ron pipe originally instal led in 1 936 . The District is considering replac eme nt with a 24-inch cast iron pipe to provide capacity for the existing and master-planned deve lopme nt for Corona del Mar and the I rvine Coast area . Impacts that direc tly affect the adjacent residents wi ll occur during the construction las ting approximate l y three months n ext winter, such as increased tra ffic congestion, nois e l eve ls and dust. The project r e port and Draf t Environmental Impact Report (EI R) can be exa mined at the following l ocations: Orange County Sanitation Districts , 10844 E llis Avenue, Fo unta in Valley Newport Beach City Hall , Community Development Dept., 3300 Newport Boulevard , Newport Beach T ELEPH ONE S: AR CA COD"E 714 540-2910 9 62 -2411 Newport Bea ch Library , 200 5 Dover Drive , Newport Beach If anyone wish es addition a l informa tion or desires furth er explanation , cal l De n ni s Reid , Senior Engin ee r, tel e phone : 540-2910 , extension 205. Fred A . Harper Genera l Manager m&~------------------.. °\''' ., . ' \ _____ . ____ -:z ·:~ ----. . ----.. . --:.. . r BAYSIDE TRUNK SEWER PR OP OSED FACI L I T IES r-.,... -- ~-~ .. A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92709 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF'·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) April 4, 1979 DRAFT To: All Interested Parties Subject: .Public Hearing for Bayside Trunk Draft EIR Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County has developed · a project report and a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the replacement of a trunk sewer in Bayside Drive generally located between El Paseo Drive and Dahlia Avenue. A public hearing will.be held concerning the Draft EIR at Newport Beach City Hall Council Chambers on at p.m. The District's sewer line now serving the area is badly deteriorated, and has broken on several occasions. It is a 10-inch cast iron pipe originally installed in 1936. The District is considering replacement with a 24-inch cast iron pipe to provide capacity for the existing and master-planned development for Corona del Mar and the Irvine Coast area. Impacts that directly affect the adjacent residents will occur during the construction lasting approximately three months next winter, such as increased traffic congestion, noise levels and dust. The project report and Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) can be examined at the following locations: Orange County Sanitation Districts, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley Newport Beach City Hall, Community Development Dept., 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach TELEPHONES: AREA CDDE '71°4' 540•2910 962-2411 Newport Beach Library, 2005 Dover_ Drive, Newport Beach If anyone wishes additional information or desires further explanation, call Dennis Reid, Senior Engineer, telephone: 540-2910, extension 205. Fred A. Harper General Manager . r [o; 0 0 ....... .......... .... .. ... .. . .... -.. -0 cc :0 :x;: o en -0 -0 0 (./) ,.,., rrt 0 '-~ :=a ,, c::: l> z (') ::s:: -r en --I r-r-1 iii :E .,, CJ) rr-i ::0 Cl , . ..u rn ~ ~ L-, I 1 01 ·1 ·~1 l"'I ~~ I ' I . . /\ ,. . ·I . I I ~ I ' ; I · 1 JI I ~L J L _ I J 1 ~1 '~l 'rii l J t) I ~ ~ I ~ I (t I I ~ I . 4,v'7i~ .. ,,..-Q . '-. I ~ I z AH!Vf4 ._0RIV£ Jv € -~r ----. --- J r ----------J ~ L__ , 4voc.A oO AVENUF-" ~'-J C .. ·::~-'D c· 11 1·00 kf_ uJ\Jo L .:=J I ... I D -- ti ~Cl '· c:i-~ I) " ~ ;) . C)_ <.() ~ ........ '. <::) ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ A•".-A r;1A AV£Nl./e /'ri~ r -. ~ ~ J ~"' . --p:f ---·-/ ~L ---~ ~ r·--, r --~ I' I• . 1t,L -..... '•· -. --·;: ---~L 11 I r1 ~t : ·;· .. ;~[·-· .. ·-,~; -·--i~l· ---,~[ ___ =i ,' "{ \)~ ~ (:) ~ I . I ______ . _I -· .. -___ __J ---__ -1 I \ p;:.·r_,o.-.·1 A Avt:NUE _ .• 'I': I.\ () .... ~ ·~-•()- () (!) \ ~ · · · ···--1 [ ___ ...... 1 1 · · ---1 1··-~---'Jr --, 1 ~~~r---~~ --.. -~ ... -.. -. ' . ·--·· -1-. I L 1' I ---..---;/. 7 /( :.----.. I ---·-----·--· "-·· --. ,/ ----. . r------1· · ·· -·1 r---~ [ -/ , __ . u ·1 • ,.,,_ __ • ,.. 1 --... _ 1 ___ ~--' L _____ J l. _____ -__ , r.. - -:..1 IJt ; 'j L -~-~.eJtv4 ,r~o:-.• . . ·--·--4 v~~ue:l· Of -.~/ 1 l --. ·-· _ .. _ . -L . I ,. · ----· ·· ·--I J l. I 1·.,· '?... ,I ;1>~: ··-· .. _J [ ____ , __ I l ---------·-/ '--.l ,, "'\) ( : ?\· Q .//,LIL./,,, "1VENUE I ... I , .. , ~ I ~: . . . I I . ·1 i l l ---. ·w ·--~) i I ., ~. ' • ~--.... -~-. L -~-. .... t . _J _// :' . [ . _J I ~ . : § 1 ..... -~ .. I r -·-· --··-·1 1 -· .. ·-, 1-/ · l ·1 L tt\_ -m ~ _______ .. L _. ____ _J L _ __I L~ // < . 11 '-"I Fc.RN LcA.r I " ,.:;i , £.•.-'/I . 1 --l --! ~-·--;-·-1 r---·-1 [-·----11) J~. . . ! _ _J L... -·' : ~L _____ L __ _J --____ _j , , L0 ,/ 1--... ··-·-·':• --~ ~ -.. ~ l . ~ . -1 r-[--·---~ ,/1 ;.' r -. -. --ii' -_: L ____ t.j ' J [._...,.. ___ L__ __ J -·----·---,~· --.. ·------.JI ::1-r; ot. oeNR. 00 A vE Nuc I : _I i ~-_ ~~--1 ~ \-___ ~_-_] [-1 l~=~] --?i 0 ~<~-:~~J I ·:. -. : . l . , ! · ·d t \ \ --.-._-·1 r-= ____ J r_ ~ -·»~:..·_ .11-· -~1 1 i \:' \ -,,,,,_,,.,_,.,,,,, ------,,, ,..,,,. ~ -" : '~ \ -) l _c,c II ' ',\ ': ! I ---II :> I \I ' I >.I .\ ·, i· I I ' ""-""-•t i,. f I l j .) I " : t I ·- . ' STATE ~· "'-.. . ""-. "T_ ----- AR£A LIM L [m 0 0 --····-· ...... .. .... -0 cc :0 :xc 0 ,, en -O o (J) ........ fT1 0 I-~ :=Cf 11 c: )> "diSD' ~ ::ai:::: r en ---f ~ r;; ~ .,, (J) rr-1 ::a -G> ' Al I'll VI ~ l_r "'!] I . ~ C1 . » ' /9' v) I) ~ ~ ~- ~ ' '· <:::> ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ·~1 .l'i ' /~' 1-1i 1 '~/ /'>i'/ 1~1 J" '·i_ I . 1),1 11i l '~I I ~ I ~1 ~ ~ ! 'II,/ I t I I II) ; : 1 1 ! ; ! ! I ~ 1 ~ _J I ~ '· l . -"------· '- r I J t ''t:-\~, LD c ---1 r 1 ·00 I ~LJuU\u D c~ c -1 o ' A .. A r" I A AV.CNUE. ,; J ~1 · -1 ~1 -· j--~1 --Jg r--1,-·--: , / () r I ~ . I . ~L -· . ---J _____ ~L_j l I I I ·;~r ·-·· -·-l ~i -J~l·· --,~[-~ .: l _ _ l_ _ J _ .. __ _ __ __J __ _ _ _J I . p 1--r_,r),-.'IA AVENUE • • Y · ·· -1 l___ ~ 1 · · ·---1 r -·-~--[JI_, ~--}:.." .. ··-·· . -. . . I ' I I -----::?;/! ! ~# ~-- '1 ()~ ~ c:i ~ . ~ () ~ Ci-- I 11i": ( I I 1 I --. i'' -,~ --·. • r-...:-=--==:..:=- 1 :-=-.--=--1· r·~ ---=1 1 --.' '·-· -(t ,~'.Y --~ · --~, , 1_ ___ =-__ I L _____ _ _ __ __ L____ __ r 1 -: 1 ·-· ...!-:."/l_-<:_JIV -d lT!°.''·' . ··-_4 V~"(UJL [Jf --~ I . ' I l -···-. j L . L _ . I 1"' ~1 · -• • -• • -, [ I ': I {'1\ .. : ' --J I__ _ -' -I ! ------·· ' . / I.. ,'.' i ~\J f i ~. I I 0/INI I A l i t ·V.€Nf.h."~ » ) , ' 1 I . ~ . ' . :J .. ·-I I. --. . I ! . J l_ __ j , . . . I ~ . : ~I . ~ I r -• • • • : r · 1 r--. --I .. " : 11 1 I L (l\_ Hi ---. L_ --___ J l -. l ·-----. / . I . '-'"I F£/dl-./Lt=/J~ I 1 -.. ~:?• £•.·1 N . ·, ;-l --! t -----;--1 c-·---, r·-· ·-----,,-.. )"" ,i1 ,. -. ..1 I ,. :ff __J ! 0 / ., ...J ·-• !"to. -I • \) -------···-·-• ......J I ' L • ,-•• --·-• I j:· ~I :•~, --1 [ [-··---~ 1 ' ~.' f ·-· -·, ... l.. ·---~·_I I L_______ _ __ J -·-· ---·---, . t _ ------Jr :i-Got .O c Ad ?.00 ./ r. /]VEA.'UE . . ~· l · 1 --. -, r----, l-· ·-11 ··: o?, .... ··11 . .1 I . --~ \ -·--· -· _f L ___ _J . ·--.I ·l , --· -- · i : . <S~ \ 1 --·-i ~---···--1 r . --· · >~: II . -·-11 \; \ \ ,,,., ,;),.,,;;; -~ ---. L --. , , , ----,,, ,._,,,, ~ 1 • : ·~ I .I l .. ·---. II ) I ! I I [_ : : d • I . I ·--•• . , I ·: ' l I . :> • \ • } I 'I ·~ I I I ... , ~ ~ -t>- c:) II> .) / / ---5 TATC. - , __ r""·E-,e-'-.....___ __ _ ~- '-.... "'-._ ' -"T -- AR£A LIM/I March 28, 1979 MEMORANDUM TO: MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FROM: FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER COUNTY S ANI TATION DISTRICTS ol O RAN GE COUNTY . CALIF ORNIA POBO X 6127 108 .l<l ELL IS A VENUE FOJNTAIN VA L_EY CALIFORNIA 9 2706 (7 14 )5•!0-29 10 (7 14) 962-2411 RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PRO JECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) AGREEMENT The Districts' staff has been holding discussions with representatives of SAWPA concerning certain obli gat i ons due the Districts. Our General Counsel has p repared a propose d amendment to an existing agreement to defer payment of funds totaling some $842,000 to June 30, 1980. SAWPA ag rees to pay 9% interest per annum on all deferred payments. The major dollar amount is the estimated supplemental treatment c os t (secondary treatment) at Plant No. 1, plus an a ggregate of other plant improvements. This figure i s an es t i mate at this time. SAWPA is developing a reve nue bond fin ancing program to complete the first phase of their construction in t he Chino and Corona areas. They expect funding b y June, 1980 and there- fore have as ked for this amendment. The SAWPA Board has agreed to the proposed a mendment in principle and the Districts' staff is r equesting that the Executive Committee reconnnend approval of the amendment to the Joint Boards. TLW:.pj ~· 03/19/79 AMENDMENT NO. l WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this __ day of-----'· 1979, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, respectively, herein collectively referred to as 11 Sanitation Districts", and SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY, herein referred to as 11 SAWPA 11 • WHEREAS, an agreement was made and entered into between Sanitation Distr'icts and Chino Basin Municipal Water District on April 12, 1972, to provide for the grant of wastewater treatment and disposal rights to Chino Basin Municipal Water District in Sanitation Districts' facilities; and WHEREAS, said agreement was assigned by Chino Basin Municipal Water District to SAWPA, effective November 13, 1974, with the consent of Sanitation Districts; and WHEREAS, the base agreement provides for SAWPA to pay to Sanitation Districts,-upon construction of supplemental treatment plan facilities, a supplemental treatment charge; and WHEREAS, there is presently due and owing the sum of $734,000.00 from SAWPA to Sanitation Districts, as a supplemental treatment charge, calculated in accordance with that formula set forth in Section 3 of the base agreement; and .WHEREAS, SAWPA is further obligated under the provisions of said agreement to pay to Sanitation Districts an annual capital cost replacement charge, calculated on a basis of an amount equal to three (3%) percent of SAWPA's investment in the primary and supplemental trcatme:1t and d·isposal rights as of each respective annual date of payment; and WHEREAS, the annua 1 ca pi ta 1 cost r~p 1 a cement cha rgc <L.Je from SlHf-A to Sanitation Districts on April 12, 1979 is $48,750.00, and the payment due on April 12, 1980 is $70,770.00; and WHEREAS, SAWPA has requested Sanitation Distri~ts to accept a deferral of those payments until June 30, 1980, contingent up(m SA',./PA paying interest on all monies due and owing. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the prenrises a.nd of the coven:rnts, rights and obligations set forth herein~ the parties hereto aqree :1s follows: 1. Sanitation Districts agree to defer the due date of i.he sup) 1 ::men ta 1 tr.~atment charge presently owing to Sanitation D·istrkts in the amcnnt of $734,000.00 until June 30, 1980. 2. Sanitation Districts agree to defer the due date for· the cap·i·::a·i cost replacement charge for the 1979 payment in the amount of $48~7::o.oo, and the April, 1980 charge in the amount of $70) 770. 00, each and bc1i.11 ·:.o June 30, 1980. 3. SAWPA agrees that it will pay ·interest at the rat2 of rdnE: (9~') percent per annum to Sanitation Districts, calculated on the a:nount 3 oLing and deferred hereunder, commencing as of the orig·inal du:; date set forth in the base agreement. 4. The extension of the due date for the specified charq~s SC·~ forth herein shall not be deemed a waiver·by Sanitation Districts of any oth~r rights of Sanitation Districts, or duties and obl i~F·.tions of s;·JJPA~ ~c1 t forth in the base agreement. -2- 5. The parties reaffirm that each of the existing provisions set forth in the base agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except as expressly modified herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Agreement as of the date and year first above written. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, respectively By ~---:c-ha-1-·rma~n-,__,,,,B-oa_r_d __ o~f~D~i-re-c~t-o-rs----------~~ By~--=-----~-=----...-...------,~~~~~---S e c re tar y, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: By~~--..--..-.--.----...-~-=-~---:-~-...~ Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY By ______ ,__ __ ~------~--------~------~ -3- ,. r .. Executive Committee Item f/4 ·. SUMMARY ANALYSIS GANN SPENDING-LIMITATION INITIATIVE ~ Sec. 1 The Gann Initiative proposes to place a constitutional limit on the expenditures of state and local government in California. The limit would be a variable limit, as opposed to a fixed limit such as a specified annual percentage growth factor. The limit, or growth factor mechanism, under the.initiative provides that the "total annual appropriations" of any ·governmental unit may not exceeq the prior year's "appropriations limit" by more than a percentage equal to the sum of the percentage changes in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (not to exceed the percentage change in California per capita personal income) and the population of the jurisdiction. ~· Sec. S(h)_The "base year" for purposes of determining the first, ·and most important, "appropriations limit" is 1978-79. Sec.-2 Revenues received in excess of the appropriations limit must be returned by a revision of tax rates or fee schedules within the subsequent two fiscal years. Sec. 3 The Initiative provides for adjustments to the "appropriations limit" in the following· ways: a) Where the financial responsibility for a service is transferred from one governmental unit to another, the new service provider shall experience an increase in the "appropriations limW' and the unit transferring the responsibility shall have its limit decreased by a like amount. The amount of the change shall be mutually agreed upon. . . b) Where the financial responsibility for a service is transferred to the private sector or where· the financial source for a . service is transferred to · regulatory licenses, user charges, or service fees; the a~propriations limit shall be reduced accordingly • . c) When there is an emergency, the appropriations limit may be exceeded provided that the limits in the following three years are reduced to prevent an aggregate increase in appropriations. Sec. 4 The appropriations limit may also be changed by a majority vote of the people within the affacted entity~ The _duration of such change, however, shall not exceed fou!" years. Sec. 5 Governmentai entities may establish special purpose funds as necessary (e.g., reserves, retirement, sinking fund). Deposits of revenues into said funds does fall within the ''appropriations limit." Withdrawals, expenditures, or transfers of these funds shall not, for t~e purposes of this article, constitute appropriations . . : Sec. 6 ''Whenever the Legislature or any state agency m·andates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, the state shall provide a subvention of funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of service, except that the Legislature may, but need not, provide such subvention of funds for the following mandates: · (a) (b) ,. (c) nLegislative mandates requested by the local agency affected; "Legislation defining a new crime or changing an existing definition of a . crime; or "Legislative mandates enacted prior to January 1, 1975, or executive orders or regulations initially implementing legislation enacted prior to January 1, 1975." -10-: •• ..., ........ 5 .................. LH .. J.'I;; .:>11 a .u Ut;; \,;Vll;)ll Ut;;U _., '"'t'Cl.ll lllt;; t1 U ll.I LY U l lilt;; ;)ltl.L t: fJ [" 0 1 any local government to meet its obligations with respect to e x isting or future bonded indebtedness." · Sec. 8 Definitions: a) " 'Appropriations subject to limitation' of t he sta te shall mean any authorization to expend during a fiscal year t h e procee ds of t uxes levied by or for the state, exclusive of stat e subventions fo r t he use a nd operatio n of local government (other than subventions made purs u a n t to Se ct ion 6 of this Article) and further exclusive of refunds of t a x e s , b e nefit pay ments from retirement, unemployment insurance and disabili t y in s ura nce fu n ds ;" b) " 'Appropriations subject to limitation' of an enti t y o f lo cal go vernment shall mean any authorization to expend during a fisc a l ye ar th e p r oc eeds of t axes levied by or for that entity and the proceeds of sta t e s ub venti ons to that entity (other than subventions made pursuant to Se ct io n 6 of this Article) exclusive of refunds of taxes;" c) "Proceeds of taxes" defined. d) "Local government" defined. e) "Cost of living" shall mean CPI for U.S., not to exceed change in C~lifornia per capita personal income. f) "Population" defined. (For school districts it shall l;ie th e ADA.) g) "Debt service" defined. · h) " 'Appropriations limit' of each entity of government fo r fi s cal y e ar 197 8-79 shall be the total of the appropriations subject t o li m it at io n of s uch e n t ity for that fiscal year. For fiscal year 1978-79, s t a te s u b v en t i ons to local governments, exclusive of federal grants, sh a ll be d e e me d to ha ve been derived from the proceeds of state taxes." i) "Except as otherwise provided in Section 5, "ap propriations subject to limitation" shall not include loca l agency lo an fu n ds or ind e b t edn ess f unds, investment (or authorizations to invest) funds o f t he s t a t e , o r o f a n entity o f local government in accounts at banks or savings a n d lo a n a sso ci a tions or in liquid securities." Sec. 9 Those expenditures excluded from the appropriations limit shall be: a) Debt service. b} Appropriations for court or federal mandates. c) "Appropriations of any special district which e xis ted o n J anua ry 1, 197 8 , and which did not as of the 1977-78 fisca l ye a r l e vy an a d va lor e m t ax on property in excess of 12 ~ cents per Sl 00 o f a s s e sse d va l ue; or t h e appropriations of any special di s trict then exis ti ng o r t herea f t e r c rea t e d b y a vote of the people, which is tota lly fun d ed by o th e r t ha n t he p roc e e ds of taxes." Sec. 10 Initiative to take effect July 1, 1980. Sec. 11 Severability Clause -11- . ··-..... -.... ·.-· ···--· -····----·-··-·····--.. --·--·--· -~ ... r -•• •• ~ 41, COMPARISON OF PROVISIONS: GANN INITIATIVE ·AND ACA 2 (BO ATWR IGHT) PROVISIONS 1. Scope of Limit 2. Growth Factor 3. Base Year 4. Adjustments to Limits 5. Appropriations Excluded From Limits ,. GANN INITIATIVE "Total annual appropriations." (Sec. I, 8h, 8e, 8f) State and Local: U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI), but not to exceed change in California per capita income, plus population change. For school districts, population is measured by ADA. (Sec. 8e, 8f) Growth is from allowable, not actual, appropriations in the prior year. (Sec. 1) State and Local: 1978-79 (Sec. 8h) (a) Limit is increased and de- creased by mutual agreement when responsibli ty for providing that service is transferred to and from governments. (Sec. 3a) 'ACA 2 (BO ATWRIGHT) "Annual appropriations." State a nd Local: California Con- sumer Price Index (CPI), but not to exceed 10 %, plus population change. Growt h is fro m actual appropria- tions o f the p rior year. State an d Local: 1979-80 (a) Sa me (b) Limit may be changed by (b) Sa me. majority vote of the electorate approving such additional appro- priations. (Sec. 4) (c) Limit may be exceeded for (c) Same . "emergency". (Sec. 3c} (d) Limit is decreased when an (d) No adjustment. entity transfers service to a pri- vate entity. (Sec. 3b) (e} Limit is decreased according-(e) No adjustment. Jy for a year when financial source of providing a service is trans- ferred to regulatory licenses, user charges or user fees . (Sec. 3b) State and Local: --Bonded indebtedness payments from all debt existing on Jan. 1, 1979; only voter-approved debt thereafte r. (S ec. 7, . 8g, 9a) -Appropriations of federal reve- nues (state and loca l). (Sec. 8h} -4- State and Local : --Bo n ded indeb t edne ss paym e nts fro m all exis t ing debt; o nly vote r -app r ove d debt af t er date of e le ction . -Appr opr ia t i on o f fed e ral reve- nues (s t ate) a nd appropriation of s t ate and f ederal revenues (loca l). ·r • ·-· PROVISIONS GANN INITIATIVE 7. Emergency Appropriations No special requirement to de- clare an emergency. By the con- trolling constitutional or sta tu- tory voting requirements, the Legislature or governing body may spend in excess of the limit in case of "emergency". How- eyer, the limits in the next 3 years must be reduced in the amount spent in excess of the limit "to prevent an aggregate increase in appropriations re- sulting from the emergency." (Sec. 3c} No express limit on duration of emergency. 8. State Reimburse-Applies to mandates enacted 9. 10. 11. ment of State-after Jan. 1, 197 5; excludes Mandated Local mandates which: define crimes, Costs are requested by the local agency affected. {Sec. 6) Oisposi tion of Revenues in Excess of Allowable Appropriations and Exclusions Year Effective Vote to Change Limitation ,. Must be returned by a revision of tax rates or fee schedules within the next two fiscal years. (Sec. 2) - Fiscal year following adoption (1980-81 if voted June 198 0 ). (Sec. 10) Electors may change limit by by majority vote for not more than 4 years. (Sec. 4) -6- -·-··· ·-·-..... -..... _. ___ ,, ....... -... ---------··------· ACA 2 (BOATWRIGHT) Requi res a 2/3rds sepa rately recorded vo t e o f the Legisla- ture o r g overn i ng bod y ; emer- gency a p pro priations do not count in determining the next year's limit. Same. Must be reflected in a correspond- ing re duction in on e or more ta xes collec ted in the next e nsuing tax year. 1980-81 · fiscal year . Elect ors m a y change limit by majority vote. -~··-----·-·---···----· ___ ,. __ -···-... COUNTY SAN!TATION DISTRICTS of OHANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10344 ELL15 AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71<) 54tl-2910 March 22, 1979 (714) 96:'-2411 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Members of the Executive Committee FROM: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance RE: Districts' Financial Plan and Revenue Program In 1972 Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control M.t (PL <12-SOO) which essentially requires a higher level of sewage treatr11cnt, cont re)] .s on industrial discharges and specifies that agencies receiving grar.ts fo:· cnnstruc- tion of facilities to comply with the law must adopt a user charge s:"~;·::en, i.e., Revenue Program, providing that user classes pay proport:iciJially to the.tr use of the system as a class and that said users be cl[1ssificd :into re~~idcn~:j al/small non-residential, industrial/large commercial or j nsti tutional/tcix ex<!L.pt groups. Also required of an approvable Revenue Progrcim is assur~nce that tot a 1. rt~vem~cs will be sufficient to properly operate and maintain the scJcragc systcM ;rnd that adequate capital funds will be provided for future fCJcilitl0s n·p::.~icement. The Revenue Program document is required to comply with Federal and ~;t ai c regulations and guidelines and must be adopted by the governing bo~rc: of each agency. In 1977 the Act was amended, largely due to the efforts of oar Directors and General Manager. The major impact of the amendments is to allow a<l \ .:i] 01·cm taxes to satisfy user charge requirements for residential/ smJ.11 11011-r·:!~ j <:ential users and a provision for waiver of full sccond;Jr)' treatment rcqnircn ent!-" for ocean dischargers, provided certain conditions uro met. Enclosed is a copy of the draft Financial Plan ancl Revenue Pro;:rr:1m (P:i.·cgi-am) for the Districts which has been prepared by Pc~1t, ~brwj ck, Mitchell & Ccm_;.~ acy (P~!~f). The Program must be submitted to the State \Vat(:r Resources Co-.1tr'.Jl Board (S\mCB) and receive their approval before July 1, 1979. This date is 0·~1cial.t in that Federal construction grant payments will be cut off after July ht if thi:: Program has not been approved. The tentative schedule is as :follows: March 28 April 11 April 12 Consideration by Executive Committee Consideration and tentative approv;! 1 by the Joint Boards Submittal to SWRCB Although the final draft will not be submittc·cl 10 S\\'RCH unt j 1 tc11t:!U \i{: ~1:>proval is given by the Directors, we have worked very closely h1 itli the ~;t;1te ~,t:tl~f jn developing the Program and a preliminary dr:ift \•::1s revi.l'\·:cd h.ith ~Ir. >r·111~, Pctc;rs, chief of the financial unit, on March 13th. Ill~ js s~1l.i;.;ficcl \dtl~ the l':o:~rlllll [1nd has indicated that approval could be given \vith a minimum c;f acldit·ionaJ n~view. ..... The major issues that must be addressed by the Boards arc: (a) User charge method for residenti:1l/small non-residential group in the event ad valorcm taxes become insufficient to cover OM&R or arc cut off entirely by the State Legislature. (b) Capital funding policies re: (1) Connection fees (2) Annexation fees (3) Annual capital charges (c) Notification requirements re residential/small non-residentlal groups on the ad valorem method (d) The ordinance implementing the Revenue Progra.m and other provisions required by the Act (e) Consolidation User Charge Method. Because of the imposition of Proposition 13, we ate 1Jncertain at this time as to how long the Districts' share of the 1% a<l vaJorem tnx levy wi 11 cover OM&R costs for the residential/ small non-rcsidenti.al ~~roup. 'foercfore, one of the policy determinations re.quired of the Board wi 11 he the met.h~)J of funding this group's costs at such time as ad valorem revenues a:re insufficient or are cut off entirely by legislative fiat. 'I11e alternate' methods are discussed on the attached table which has been extracted from Section III of the: Revenue Program. The industrial/large commercial group will be charged on the basis of a:t~rnl use and receive credit for ad valorem taxes paid in essentially the sa.n~ :nanner that has been used since adoption of the industTinl Naste orcl:Lnance in 1970. Therefore, this group will not be affected by the tax issue. The users' total charge will remain the same. The only difference \wulcl be the a1:1ount co] lected via the property tax bill and the amount billed directly by the Distr.i.cts. It should be noted that the industrial/large commercial base for 1979-g.) will consist of the firms cuTrently permitted under the existing indu:;trial '<faste ordinance. Over the next few years the Districts must identify all oth,;r users that discharge greater than 25, 000 gallons per cfay of cqui val ent dome;·,. Le waste and transfer such users from the residentiaJ /sma) l 1wn-rcside:ntfr l gr•Jll) to the industrial/ large commercial group. This wi 11 be rm extcnsi ve unc:ertab.~ tg and necessitate the review of around 30,000 properties. With the exception of a few large Federal and State instalJ at.ions, th::: ins ti tu- tional/tax exempt group does not presently pay taxes to the U:i.st·ricts ane.l, therefore, will not be affected by a change in the tax provis:on:~. This f!roup will be billed separately by the Districts based on actuul use. It is our interpretation of the law that local governmcnt;i l agencies arc exempt f .ro;n user charges. -2- Capital Funding Policies. With the adoption of PL 92-500, the Districts anticipated the need to construct advanced treatment facilities and have been accumulating reserves to provide necessary capital for such construction. An application for waiver under the amended provisions of the Act has been submitted and we expect to receive the waiver. This will enable capital funds accumulated for final stages of secondary treatment to be reappropriated for other capital projects. These funds, combined with other reserves accumulated pursuant to the Boards' long-range capital financing policies, are sufficient to fully fund capital needs for the next five years, thus avoiding a general capital levy against current users during that period. If, however, the waiver request is denied, additional capital funds will be required. The capital financial plan will be set forth in Section II. There are several policy issues which must be addressed with regard to future capital financing; specifically, connection fee determination, annexation fee calculation methods, and annual capital charges. 1he recommendati0ns have not been finalized and, the~efore, Section II of the Revenue Program is not yet completed. However, this section, exclusive of the above items, is contained in the draft. Tile consultant expects to complete work on these items prior to the Executive Committee meeting and submit a separate analysis for review by the Committee. 'Ihe selected methods will then be incorporated into the Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program. Notification. Prior to Jarvis-Gann, the Districts' ad valorem charge was included as a separate line item on the tax bill. This procedure complied with thd Federal requirement of notifying the users of the cost for wastewater treatment services. Now the Districts' portion of the tax charge is included in the total general levy and the cost of our service is, therefore, not identifiable. A separate notice for residential/small non-residential users will thus be necessary to satisfy this requirement. There are basically three options which are (1) print a notification directly on the tax bill, (2) a separate printed insert to be mailed with the tax bill and (3) a separate notice to be mailed to all property owners. 1here are inherent problems with each. Industrial and true-exempt users will not be affected as they will be billed .separately by the Districts, thus satisfying this requirement. Implementing Ordinance and Consolidation. The Boards must adopt an ordinance implementing the Revenue Program and other prov1s1ons of the Act. TI1e staff and General Counsel are in the process of drafting an amendment to the existing ordinance to satisfy this requirement. The SWRCB has advised that the ordinance need not be adopted prior to July 1st. Therefore, the Boards may wish to consider the amendment concurrently with their review and determinatjon relative to the proposed consolidation of Districts. -3- ( Billing Alternative TABLE ( -1 ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR USER CHARGES WHEN AV TAXES ARE INSUFFICIENT·TO PAY OM&R COSTS Probable Calculation Method ( Other Major Relevant Issues 1. Separate charge as a special assessment on the property tax bill. 1. Subdivide user classes into sub- classes such as single family and multi-family dwellings, office buildings, small commercial estab- lishments, etc., and calculate flat rates attendant to each based on average discharges and system loading from representative samplings. · 1. (a) Current Statutory authority exists 2. Separate charge collec·ted. 2. Base charge on water volume on water purve~or's utility billing. (b) Requires a public hearing and separate notice of said hearing to all property owners. (c) Utilizes existing assessor file as data base and tax bill as billing mechanism. However, data base would require.sub- stantial annual update at Districts' expense and conversion to a computer tape input by Districts to assess charge on tax bill. (d) Inaccuracy of Assessor's data base may result in high percent of billing errors and require a customer service function. (e) Unsewered properties could be reflected in rate structure once identified and/ or separate provisions made for rebate. (f) Maximum charge for tax collector's service is established at $S/account or 1% of collections, whichever is greatet (g) Low delinquency factor. (h) Cash flow is not spread evenly. (i) Would satisfy notification requirements 2. (a) Current statutory authority exists. However, it is permissive, not mandat- ory for the water utility. (b) Would not require a public hearing. (c) Would require contractual arrangements· and system modifications with approx- imately 150 water purveyors. (Continued) (' Billing Alternative 2. (Cont'd.) 3. Direct billing by CSDOC ( TABLE III-1 (Cont'd) Probable Calculation Method 3. Same as 1. above utilizing assessor's files as the data base source. ( Other Major Relevant Issues (d) Would require a minimum of data base maintenance by the Districts as this would be automatically done by the water utility. However, separate arrangements may have to be made with the utility to reflect loadings of small commercial establishments. (e) Charge more directly associated with actual use (assuming use is related to water consumption). (f) Unsewered properties would have to be identified and a system exception or rebate provision made. (g) High delinquency. (h) Cost of service by utility is unknown and would have to be negotiated or established by code amendments. (i) Cash flow \.;ould be more uniform. (j) Would satisfy notification require- ments. 3. (a) Current statutory authority exists. (b) Would require installation of exp~n­ sive computerized billing system and associated personnel and administra- tive costs or contractine with ~n out.sidP, hurerm. (c) :·lost costly method. (d) Requir1.?s extensive data hnse me?1n- Jl1aintemmce. (e) Inaccuracy of data base source may result in high percent of billing errors. (Continued) ..... ..... .... I -....J ( Billing Alternative 3. (Cont'd.) 4. Impose a Separate AV Tax Levy ( ( TABLE III-1 (Cont'd) Probable Calculation Method Other Major Relevant Issues 4. Based on property value (f) Unsewered properties could be reflected in rate structure once identified and/ or separate provision.made for rebate. (g) Expected delinquency factor would be highest. (h) Cash flow impact would be based on determination of billing frequency. (i) Would satisfy notification requirements. 4. (a) Requires 2/3 voter approval (b) Unsewered property issue would have to be resolved (c) Low delinquency factor (d) Most cost effective method (e) Cash flow not spread evenly (f) Would satisfy notification requirements (g) Least equitable 4-11-79 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN WELCOME NEW DIRECTORS AND ACKNOWLEDGE FORMER DIRECTORS WHO HAVE BEEN REAPPOINTED TO THE BOARDS, CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.~ WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25TH, INVITE Iml. OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: FRANCIS GLOCKNER BETH GRAHAM THE COMMITTEE WILL BE CONSIDERING THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL 25TH RELATIVE TO THE REMAINING STEPS TO COMPLETE THE EPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) TO ADD THE NEEDED CAPACITY TO THE TREATMENT PLANTS. THE STAFF AND THE DISTRICTS' EIS CONSULTANT WILL BE MEETING WITH SAN FRANCISCO EPA PERSONNEL NEXT WEDNESDAY~ APRIL 18TH. MEETING DATE April 11, 1979 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS_ 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 DISTRICT 1 ~IELSH)J • • • • • • ·SH/\RP i~i· • • • ·-----(.Afiii.....,.;,... 1ruG&IDOtQ ev.o.m; .w'A'-1) .__ __ __ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··---__ ·CRANK) : •••• HUTCHISON ---__ DISTRICT 2 ~FRIED) •••••• • -WEDAA· • • • •• ·----- RASHFORDL •••• HOLT·· ••••• ·--___ _ AHTHONY J •••••• CLARK· ••••• ·------ (GAMB INAL ••••• FOX ••••••••• ------ WELLS) ~·.r ... , ... HOUSTQ~ ••••• ------ E'iJl\HS) ~.AIU> ... , SRTl 7.·J'A,f\tfaJSJ'.Q__ ---- CUL VER) •••••• , PERRY •• • ••• •------ GRAHAM) ........ ROGET •••••• ----- SEYMOUR) ... •••• ROTH •••••• ·------- HOYT J ••••• • • • • SM ITH •••••• ·--___ _ > ADLER) ••••• ··.STANTON •••• ·--___ _ WINTERS) •• ••• -VELASQUEZ •• ·--__ -- DJSTRJCT 3 ) ADLER .• •••• • • .SVALSTAD. • • ·----__ PERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·----__ CORBETT)., •••• GRAHAM ••••• .__ ___ _ LACAYO) ••••• ,.HUDSON ....... ____ _ / SEITZ). ........ LASZLO •• · •••• _____ _ GAMB I NA) •••••• LE-BARON •.••• __ __ __ FINLAVt8f ····OLSON·~··\.\: ___ _ EWdfS) ••• l\b .. , 9RTIZ.·J~~\"l'lb'to __ . ~NYBORG) ••.•••• PRIEST ••••• ._ ___ _ GRIFFIN) •••••• REESE ••••••• _____ _ SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH •••••••• _____ _ PATTINS1N) •••• SIEBERT •••• ·--___ _ f ZOMMICK ..... ,. SYLVIA •••••• _____ _ WHEELER ~ ••••• WE.I SHAUPT ••• ___ . __ _ "ANTHONY •·• .. ~·.WIEDER ....... _____ _ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····--___ _ DISTRICT 5 ~liUMMEL) • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·-----. - ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·······------ RYCl<OFF). ·····STRAUSS·····------ DISTRICT 6 ( RYC KOFF) •••••• MC INN is ... ·------ ( R l LEY) ••.•••••• ANTHONY· • • • ·--___ _ (CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON···--___ _ DISTRICT _l HOYT-:--) ••••••• Sl•1ITH ••••••• ____ _ WAHNER ·······GLOCKNER •••• _____ _ (/\~THOt.J.~). ••• • -CLAfi~J;~ ·-__ ( e"'TJ z )ll\lt,~)f\Ol<\-E¥M+S • ·--__ --~ \~E LSH) • ·······SALTARELLI··--___ _ GAIDO) • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· · ·--___ _ RYCKOFF). ·····WILLIAMS····-----.- DISTRICT 11 -MAC ALLISTER)·P/'.TTJNSON·. ---'---~ATTINSQN)· ···BAILEY·····~ ---- /\NTllONY) ••• • • • W.I EDER· • • • • ·--__ __ 4/11/79 JOINT BOARDS ~RI LEY)· • ·······ANTHONY· • • • ---- PATTI NSQN). •••• BAILEY ..... ·---- ANTHONY) ••••••• CLARK •••••. ---- GAMB I NA).······ FOX···· • · • · __ -- ~PERRY)" ......... CULVER ••• :.. ---- ORT I z) .11\J'fU\1001.0. EVAN& .WJ\~l) __ -- GAMB I NA) • • • • • • • LE BARON • • • ----· - {WAHNER) •••••••• GLOCKNER ••• __ -- CORBETT)· • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ---- GR I FF IN)·.····· ·REESE······ ---·- RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT ••••••• ___ _ WELLS). •••••••• HOUSTON •••• _· __ _ LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON ••••• ___ _ CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCH I SON •• ___ _ SE nz). ........ LASZLO ••••• ___ _ RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ___ _ WHEELER)······· WE I SHAUPT • ·---- FI NLAYSQN). •••• OLSON v .. · ·I\ · ---- E'OcNS) Waltb ... ORTIZ: lftNl fr)&lO __ MAC ALl-1 STER) •• PATT I NSON •• ___ _ CUL VER). ••••••• PERRY •••••• ___ _ NYBORG) •••••••• PRIEST ••••• ___ _ ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••• ,. ___ _ GRAHAM) •••••••• ROGET ....... __ -- SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• __ -- HUMMEt-L ••••••• RYCKOFF ..•• ___ _ h'ELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI·--__ ~IELSH) ••••••••• SHARP •••••• ---- PATTINSON) ••••• SIEBERT.·.·--__ HOYT)····· •• ••• SMITH.·· • • • ___ _ ~ADLER) ••••••••• STANTON •••• ___ _ RYCKOf F) · · •• • • • STRAUSS. • • • ___ _ ADLER)·· •••• ••• SVALSTAD •• ·--__ ! ZOMMI CK).··.··· SYLVIA.·. •• ___ _ GA IDO) • • •••••• • VAR DO ULI S •• ___ _ WINTERS) ••••••• VELASQUEZ •• ___ _ FR I ED)· • • • • • • • • WED AA. • • • • • ___ _ ANTHONY).······ WIEDER.····--__ (RYCKOFFJ ••••••• WILLIAMS •• ·--__ (VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS ••• ·• ___ _ OTHERS HARPER •.• -• -- SYLVESTER •. __ LEWIS ••••.• -- CLARKE ••••• _~ BROWN •••••• __ WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER ••.. __ HOWARD ••••• __ HUNT ••••••• __ l~EITH .••••• __ KENl!EY ••••• __ LYNCH .••••• __ _ MADDOX ••••• __ MART W SON •• __ Pl EHSALL ••• __ STEVEr·:s ••.• -- TRAVEHS •••• __ ,/ . . J RESOLUTIO NS AND SUPPO RTI NG DOCU MENTS APRIL 11~ 1979 -7:30 P.M. -• ;:. ·~ JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS \.,,.,145046 45047 45048 45049 45050 45051 45052 45053 45054 45055 45056 45057 45058 45059 45060 45061 45062 45063 415064 45065 45066 45067 45068 45069 45070 ' _,45071 ..... 45072 45073 45074 45075 45076 45077 45078 45079 45080 45081 45082 45083 45084 45085. 45086 45087 45088 ; ; 45089 45090 45091 45092 45093 45094 45095. -...._/45096 ·. 45097 45098 II A-1" Advertising Unlimited, Building Signs $ Air California, Air Fare Airborne Freight Corp., Freight All Seals, Inc., Engine Parts Allied Colloids, Chemicals American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts. K. ,Ando, Computer Program re Lab Variance Analysis Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Aurora Pump Co., Pump Parts Automated Deburring Supply, Truck Parts Hilary Baker, Employee Mileage Ball Industries, Janitorial Supplies Bank·of America, Bond Processing Beckman Instruments, Lab Supplies Bel-Art Products, Lab Supplies Bierly & Associates~ Inc., Workers' Comp. Administration Bishop Graphies, Drafting Supplies Black & D~cker Mfg. Co., Truck Repair W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage C & R Reconditioning Co., Bearing Repairs CS Company, Freight Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co;, Safety Supplies Calgon Corp., Chemicals California State University, Publication Carman Tool & Abrasives, Small Hardware Carmenita Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Truck Parts Chemical Engineering, Publication Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Motor Oil Brian Chuchua's Jeep, Inc., Truck Parts Cla-Val Co., Engine Parts College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber Connecticut General, Group Insurance Premium Consolidated Electrical Dist., Small Tools Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Control Specialists, Inc., Controls Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County Sanitation Dist •. of Orange County, Workers' .Comp •. Fund T.H. Creears Corp., Pump Parts Charles P. Crowley Co., Engine Parts Deco., Electrical Supplies · George DeMatteo, Employee Mileage Diamond. Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supply Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Electro Test, Inc., Ground Resistor Testing Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Esterline Angus, Lab Supplies Fillmore & Garber, Inc., Small Tools Filter Supply Co., Engine Parts Fisher Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Flo-Systems, Pump Parts AGENDA-ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 55.11 74.00 79.57 103.69 424.00 400.70 777.56 50.00 1,028.38 243.53 92.96 15.00 24.17 1,133.99 13.72 53.21 900.00 48.01 18.08 33.78 140.00 17.88 96.49 704.90 26.50 16.51 405.71 30.00 3,564.36 45.90 15.98 127.52 297.60 51.43 8,009.63 152.69 329.45 6.00 .. 1,015.95 2,268.35 175.59 175.62 33.30 76.00 221. 73 307.54 200.00 3,000.00 102.29 106.95 218.74 193.98 173.51 "A-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 19i9 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS . 45099 45100 45101 45102 45103 45104 45105. 45106 45107 45108 45109 451}.0 45111 45112 45113 45114 45115 45116 45117 45118 45119 45120 45121 45122 45123 45124 45125 ·45126 45127 45128 45129 45130 45131 45132 45133 45134 45135 45136 45137 45138 45139 45140 45141 45142 45143 45144 45145 45146 45147 45148 45149 4.5150 Foothill Feed Co., Truck Parts City of Fountain Valley, Water France Compressor Products, Engine Parts G.W. Maintenance, Inc., Truck Repairs General Conveyor, Inc., Turbine Building Repair General Electric Co., Controls General Telephone Co., Telephone Gierlich Mitchell, Inc., Electrical Supplies Goldcnwcst Fertilizer Co., Sludge Hauling Gould, Inc.-Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Supply M.E. Gray Co., Lubricant Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Halsted & Hoggan, Inc. Electrical Pump Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Leases David A. Hodgson, Employee Mileage Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co., Chemicals Howard Supply Co., Steel Stock Hunter Woodworks, Inc., Pallets City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental Huntington Supply, Small Hardware International Harvester Co., Truck P~rts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Jefferson Associates, Deferred Compensation Transfer Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supply Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valve Supplies Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Truck Parts King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supply Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools L.A. Chemicals, Chemicals L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lighting Distributors, Inc., Electrical Supplies A.J. Lynch Co., Janitorial Supplies Mahl Steel & Bolt Co., Steel Stock Charles Meriam Co., Electrical Supplies Moore Products Co., Electrical Repair Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals National Lumber Supply, Lumber Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water North West Motor Welding, Inc., Engine Parts Orange Coast llardwood & Lumber, Lumber Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Electrical Supplies Pacific Telephone Co., Signal Circuits Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M.C. Patten Corp., Glass Tubing Pettibone Corp., Equipment Repairs - Pickwick Paper Products, Paper Products City of Placentia, Manhole Repair AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 161.60 563.62 197.33 25.50 555.00 16.43 498.57 98.99 7 J 751.25 201.56 51.68 9.47 662.81 819.23 12.00 329.98 2,139.59 1,253.83 691.12 737.80 33.32 147.98 196.81 3.20 75.00 172.87 91.15 561.94 411.25 130.09 58.30 183.40 1,186.62 20.99 412.13 203.20 379.98 395.26 418·. 00 2,742.43 612.89 205.47 43.05 349.80 165.36 285.83 46.91 1,083.80 108.25 959.51 329.00 480.00 ''A '>" -'- JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 45151 '...._,; 45152 45153 45154 45155 45156 45157• '4515·8. 45159 45160 45161 45162 45163 45164 45165 45166 45167 45168 45169 45170 45171 45172 45173 . 45174 45175 . 45176 '-"''45177 45178 45179 45180 45181 45182 45183 45184 45185 45186 45187 45188' 45189 45190 45191 45192 45193 ,· / 45194 "A-3" Postmaster, Postage Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Printec Corp., Paper Supplies . Productool, Inc., Small Tools Quality Building Supply, Cement Supply Radio·Shack 113124, Sound Level Meter The Register, Classified Advertising . :·· s·~ a·. C., Inc., Paving Sand Dollar Business Forms, Office Supplies Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts Santa· Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Repair· Sirgent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Seal Engineering Co., Rubber Products Sears, Roebuck and Co., Small Tools Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies . Sidu. Mfg. Co., Pipe Supply Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power Southern Calif. Water Co., Water Southern Regional Safety Seminar, Seminar Registration Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Sterling Power Systems, Inc., Motor Parts The Suppliers, Small Tools J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash T.f.I. Building Materials,·Pipe Supply Taylor-Dunn, Electric Motor Tileville, Tile · Travel Buffs, Air Fare Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts United Industrial Supply, Inc., Electrical Supplies United Parcel Service, Delivery United Sta~es Equipment, Inc., Compressor P~rts U.S. Government, Publication Utilities Supply Co., Small Tools Valley Cities Supply Co., Electrical Supplies VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Vehicle Spring Service, Truck Parts Victor Comptometer Corp., Calculator Repair John R. Waples, Odor Consulting Waukesha Engine Servi center, Engine . Parts .. Western Salt Co., Salt Supply Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Milton D. Winston, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services Ev·erett H. York Co., Hose TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 500.00 18.00 34.00 151.42 589.36 42.'35 . 381.95 1,966.11 338.14 82.20 170.00 5.72 168.22 104.94 183.87 963.57 46,565.66 6.51 120.00 280.07 226.56 175.08 349.87 1,279.84 577.70 80.51 132.00 929.37 104.82 32.51 205.06 50.00 58.72 2,139.24 534.58 258.52 612.41 213.00 570.64 136.35 378.21 31.98 4,809.39 159.00 $ 123,866.16 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 197~ WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUNO WARRANTS 45030 45031 45032 45033 45034 45035 45036. 45037 45038 45039 45040 45041 45042 45043 45044 45045 II A-4" Associated of Los Angeles, Testing Equipment Buticr Engineering, Inc., Contract P2-23 Administration California Electric Services, Inc., Paint Shaker Compressor Service Co., Contract E-092 Drew Carriage Co., Lawn Mower Dunlap Appliance Co., Inc., Operations Center Appliances Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment Envirotech, Belt Press Rental re LA/OMA Solids Study Equinox-Malibu, Contract J-4-2 C.11. Leavell & Co., Contract P2-23-3 Menke Marking Devices, Chalkhoar<ls The Register, Leg3l Advertising PW-070 Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Moisture Ba.lance H.C. Smith Construction Co., Contract P2-23-6 Triad Mechanical, Inc., Contract I-lR Utilities Supply Co., Power Equipment TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS l AMOUNT $ 180.96 .v 10,872.00 417.31 87 I 710. 80 395.33 803.48 279.78 1,590.00 20,087.10 23,471.65 291.41 282.00 511. 98 885,533.40 30,733.12 118.46 $ 1,063,278.78 $ 1,187,144.94 II A-1~ II INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 1979 . . ""'-' WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ·ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 45024 45025 Christeve Corp., Contract 2-19 The Register, Legal Advertising 2-SR-l TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND . WARRANT NO •. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 45026 45027 Colich & Sons, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-13-1 Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND ~ IYARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF ,· ;' 45028 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contract 3-20-4 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 45029 K.P. Lindstrom & Associates, EIR Bayside TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 "B" .AGENDA ITEM #8·-ALL DfSTRICTS . . . .. . $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 159,047.01 282.00 159,329.01 AMOUNT 468,568.80 117,616.94 586,185.74 AMOUNT 14,671.72 14,671.72 600,857.46 AMOUNT 3,473.91 3,473.91 "B II JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 27, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 45257 45258 45259 45260 45261 45262 45263 45264 45265 45266 45267 45268 45269 45270 45271 45272 45273 45274 45275 45276 45277 45278 45279 45280 45281 45282 45283 45284 45285 45286 45287 45288 45289 45290 45291 45292 . 45293 45294 45295 45296 45297 45298 45299 45300 45301 45302 45303 45304 45305 45306 "C-1" A-1 Acoustics, Tile_ All Seals, Inc., Gaskets Almquist Tool & Equipment, Small Tools Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Publications VOID Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Truck Parts Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Bank Amcricard, Travel Expenses Banning Battery Co., Batteries Berkley Controls, Iilc., Electrical Supplies Bierly & Associates, Inc., Self Insurance Program Bird Machine, Inc., Engine Parts Blair-Martin Co., Inc., Pump Ports Blue Diamond Materials} Concrete Mix Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage C.W.P.C.A., Publications Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber Control Specialists, Inc., Controls Mr. Crane, Cr~ne Rental D.M.E., Inc., Engine Parts Data Printer Corp., Office Supplies Decker Instrument Supply Co., Engine Parts Deco, Electrical Supplies Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies . Electric Machinery Mfg. Co., Electrical Supplies Fischer & Porter Co., Plumbing Supplies Fisher Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Flo-Systems, Pump Parts Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware Clifford A. Forkert, Engineering Services France Compressor Products, Compressor Parts City of Fullerton, Water General Electric Co., Electrical Repairs General Telephone Co., Telephone Georgia-Pacific, Lumber Gould, lnc.-Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Supply George T. Hall Co., Pun~ Parts Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tire Repair Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co., Chemicals House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Co., Valve Repair Hundley Co., Inc., Controls City of Huntington Beach, Water Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supplies Kclco Sales~ Engineering Co., Compressor Parts AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 228.70 151.77 145.75 99. 4.0 .. oo 378.61 1,220.16 278.26 257.81 210.79 900.00 3,709.25 246.89 218.98 94.00 . 39.90 21.20 3,288.47 174.69 1,072.12 598.50 58.49 245.51 171.00 7.96 610.31 71.39 312.84 324.02 51.52 1,548.66 100.49 667.00 440.44 15.06 1,772.93 3,922.98 711. 91 35.27 208.89 165.00 102.99 391.84 1,668.47 85.44 191. 97 471. 71 10.29 614.12 101. 35 ur 1" '"'- JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 27, 1979· WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS "-45307 45308 45309 45310 45311 45312 . 45313 45314 45315 45316 4531~ 45318· 45319 45320 45321 45322 45323 45324 45325 45326 45327 45328 ·45329 45330 ·5331 "-(5332 45333 45334 45335 45336 45337 45338 45339 45340 45341 45342 .45343 45344 45345 45346 45347 45348 .·: 45349 45350 45351 45352 45353 45354 45355 ·~356 ~ "C-2" . King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Wire Supply L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies LFE Environmental Labs, Lab Analysis Lewco Electric Co., Truck Repair Lighting Distributors, Inc., Light Bulbs McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Parts McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Small Tools N. Martin, Air Breaker Repair Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprint Reproduction Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Publication Moore Products Co., Electrical Supplies Motorola, Inc., Communications Contract Nalco Chemical Co., Freight National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware National Picture Frames, Inc., Office Supplies Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Gaskets City of Newport Beach, Water OCB Reprographics, Inc., Index Maps Orange Coast College Book Store, Publications Pacific Telephone Co., Signal Circuit~ M.C. Patten Corp., Gauges Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Reddi Rooter, Knott Interceptor Repairs Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Metal Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Sargent ·Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies . City of Seal Beach, Water Sears, Roebuck & Co., Small ToQls Shepherd Machinery Co., Truck Repair South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power · Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water Sterling Power Systems, Inc., Engine Parts Superintendant of Documents, Publications The Suppliers, Safety Supplies . J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash TFI Building Materials, Plumbing Supplies Travel Buffs, Air Fare Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline United Industrial Supply, Inc., Pipe Supplies United Parcel Service, Delivery Service United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts VBA Cryogenics, Special Gases Valley Cities Supply Co., Plumbing Supplies AGENDA ITEM.#8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 945.45 36.31 318.53 10.00 67.67 5.40 1,313.14 103.12 1,412.25 214.83 237.12 35.80 268.03 379.33 37.60 267.31 97.94 13.19 5.00 14.74 48.02 260.93 . 438. 73 549.66 18.00 107.10 24.00 191.15 166.85 855.75 9.01 95.14 5,704.07 60.12 14,406.22 4,070.71 209.96 29.74 15.00 111. 51 166.01 1,291.53 847.00 201.98 11. 74 96.46 17.34 356.38 463.61 409. 71 "C-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 27, 1.979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 45357 45358 45359 45360 45361 45362 "C-3" Valve & Primer Corp., Valves Valve Services, Inc., Engine Parts VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Guy ~. Warden & Sons, Plumbing Supplies Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corp., Xerox Reproduction TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 163.32 130.85 ·s20. os 77.36 3,927.84 1,937.23 $72, 187. 97 "C-3" I • .· JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 27, 1979. WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 45251 ~5252 45253 45254 45255 45259 ,. ,· "C-LJ II Ball Industries, Vacuum Butier Engineering, Inc., P2-24 Value Eng. Compressor Service eo., Contract E-092 Equinox-Malibu, Contract J-4-2 · Saturn Mfg. Corp., Accounting Dept. Partitions Valley Cities Supply, Vise TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 431. 42 3,600.00 5,641.20 4,672.80 949.00 437.80 $15,732.22 $87,920.19 "C-4" WARRANT NO. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 27, 1979 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 45245 Fulop, Rolston, Burns & McKittrick, S.B.E. Refund re Annex _ff35$ TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. ACCUMULATED C:\ P ITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 45246 45247 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad, 2-19 Inspection County of Orange, Lab Analysis 2-19 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 45248 Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-13-1 and 3-20-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 3 WARRANT NO. FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF 45249 45250 "~" Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-20-4 Smith Emery Co., Testing 3-20-4 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FR FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ .· $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 525.00 525.00 AMOUNT 306.55 778.35 1,084.90 1,609.90 AMOUNT 4,318.00 4,318.00 AMOUNT 4,977.00 l,7~7.50 6,744.50 11,062.50 "D" v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO • __ N_/_A ________ _ C.O. N0. ____ 1 __ ~~----~~--~-- CONTRACTOR: EQUINOX-MAL!BU DATE March 29, 1979 ~----------------------------------~~------~~~~~~~~----- JOB: CHLORINATION FACILITY REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. ,J-4-2 Amount of this Change Order {ADD) (RiRU£f) $ _fil!fi. 115 ______ _ . In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in t~e contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following . additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated November 29, 1978 and December 12, 1978. District's letter 1 dated December 1, 1978. ADD: 1. 2. ~· DEDUCT: 1. . ... Removal, refabrication, and painting of existing handrail at facility. Total add this item Commercial blast, prime coat, and· paint all existing 8" post-chlorination pipe within the Chlorination Facility. Total add for this item Total Add: Contractor was allowed to keep existing equipment in service during refurbishing period. Total credit for this item Total Deduct: TOTAL ADD Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time A. For delays in procurement of parts B. For inclement weather • TOTAL TIME EXTENSION "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $411.45 517.50 $9213.95 $242~50 $242.50 $686.45 42 Calendar Days 13 Calendar Days 55 Calendar Days "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_/A ____________ _ \.,,,,J C.O. N0. _____ 1 ______________ ___ CONTRACTOR: ______ E_QU_I_N_o_x_-MAL ___ I_BU~---------------DATE _________ Mar ___ c_h __ 2_9_,_1_9_7_9 ____ __ JOB: CHLORINATION FACILITY REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-4-2 . SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date . Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 EQUINOX-MALIBU By _______________________ ~~--~-- C on tractor September 28, 1978 120 Calendar Days January 25, 1979 SS.calendar Days SS Calendar Days 175 Calendar Days March 21, 1979 ••• . •. Or_lg_lnal ~ontract Price $_1_3_7_,_so_o_._o_o ___ _ Pr~v. Auth. Changes $ _____ o_.o_o ____ _ This Cha.nge (ADD) (IJ~PJHR) $ ___ 6_a_6_.4_s __ _ Amended Contract Price $ 138,186.45 Approved: .COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Ora_nge County, Ca 1 i f orn i a By------------------~---~~~---C hie f Engineer "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" RESOLUTION NO. 79-39 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-4-2 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TllE BOARDS or D !RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-4-2 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREE~ffiNT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, ·1 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, equinox-malibu, has completed the work in .accordance with the terms of the contract for CHLORINATION FACILITIES REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-4-2, on March 21, 1979; ·~nd, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered '-.,,/ filed; and, Section 3. That Job No. J-4-2 is hereby accepted as comple1:e in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 28, 1978; and, . Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with equinox-malibu setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Chlorination Facilities ncfurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2, is hereby approved; and, · Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of ,·: County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute · said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Coilllscl. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. · "F" AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "F" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. __ N~/A...._ ____________ ~ _;..,,) C.O. NO. 1 --------------------------...... _ CONTRACTOR: ____ T_R_IA_D __ ME __ C_HA __ N_ICA~L~, __ I_N_C_. ________ ~ ·oATE ________ M_a_r_c_h __ 29 __ ,_1_9_7_9 __________ _ JOB: REHABILITATION OF ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, JOB NO. I-lR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ 15,.119.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD: -I 1. Re~ocate power panel from station entry way to above grade due to insufficient space. Electrical panel found to be too large to construct as shown on Plans 2. Miscellaneous modifications of structural steel piping and equipment due to variation of existing equipment TOTAL ADD Extension of Contract Time The contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for the above mentioned items of 20 calendar days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date . Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date April 27, 1978 250 Calendar Days January 1, 1979 20 calendar Days 20 Calendar Days 270 Calendar Days January 21, 1979 $11,619.00 3,500.00 $15,119.00 Original Contract Price $ 371,.173.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo This Change (ADD) (~) $ 15,119.00 Amended Contract Price $ 386,292.00 Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 Approved: ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange Co~nty, California TRIAD MECHANICAL, INC. •By ______________________________ _ By ____________________________ ___ Contractor Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" . ; "H-1" BID TABUL/\TIONS Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks Specification A-096 III. Two 9-Yard Dump Trucks Trans-West Ford $35,616.00 Fontana Theodore Robins 36,131.16 Ford, Costa Mesa Carmenita Ford 36,381.51 Santa Fe Springs McCoy Ford No-Bid Anaheim Goodwin Dodge No-Bid Fullerton Bob Johnson GMC Long Beach Peck Road Ford Whittier International Harvester, Anaheim Fairway Ford Placen:tia 35,6Jt5.68 36,237.80 38'101(. 77 No-Bid' III-A Alternate Bid No.:..Bid No-Bid " " " * 34,472.40 " i~ 36 ,937. 25 No-Bid * Do hot meet specifications.which called for chrome piston rod on the hoist mechanism. Alternate bids do not include chrome rod. The chrome rod was specified to prevent rust and pitting that inturn would cause earlier replacement of rod and interim replacement of seals . AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL.DISTRICTS "H-1" ,· March 30, 1979 022 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM J. Wayne Sylvester Ted Hoffman Vehicle Bids: Specification Numbers A-096 and A-097 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANG~ COUNTY, CALl~ORNIA, P. 0. BOX 5175 1084• ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 (714) 540-2910 v (71•) 962-2411 Sealed bids were opened on March 27, 1979, for furnishing three (3) pickups and two (2) 9-yard dump trucks. The tabulation of bids received is attached. •, It is recommended on Item II (one pickup) that the bids received from Theodore Robins Ford,. and Fairway Ford be rejected for not meeting District specifications. It is also recommended that the alternate bids for the two dump trucks (Item III-A) be rejected for not meeting District specifications. It i·s further recommended that the awards of Items I, II, and III be made to the low bidders meeting specifications: Item I and II to Bob Johnson GMC for an amount of $15,98q,8o and Item III to Trans-West Ford for $35,616.00. All figures include sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for the pickups. The .budgeted amount for the dump trucks is $29,680. The cost of these trucks has increased 20% from last years purchase. The additional amount of $5,936 needed to complete this purchase can be transferred from the amount budgeted for a one-ton cab & chassis. This unit will not be purchased this fiscal year. It should be noted that on the bid received from Trans-West Ford, low bidder on Item III, listed the following exception: any possible new mandated equipment imposed by the federal government after submi sion of bid, that results in an additional cost to ~ •to c any, would be added to bid price at time of delivery. & Property W.N. ~larke, Sdperintendent Attachment (bid tabulation) TH/yh ~'H-2" AGENDA ITEM· #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" i :' II I II BID TABULATIONS Three (3) Conventional Type Pickup Trucks Specification A-097 Bob Johnson GMC Long Beach Theodore Robins Ford, Costa Mesa Carmenita Ford Santa Fe Springs McCoy Ford Anaheim Goodwin Dodge· Fullerton Trans-West Ford Fontana Peck Road Ford Whittier International Harvester, Anaheim Fairway Ford . Placentia : ... · .. I. Two Pickups 6 Cylinder Manual Trans. $10 '205 ;68· 10,74!1.16 11,173.00 · No-Bid 11,270.21~ No-Bid No-Bid No-Bid· 10,489.~0 II. One Plckup 8 Cylinder Auto. Trans. ~~ 5,686.90 5,901.66 5,836.38 5,9~2.31 No-Bid No-Bid No-Bid *Do not meet specifications. Both dealers bid 6-cylinder engines, specifications called for V-8 engines AGENDA ITEM ~9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II II J" RESOLUTION NO. 79-42 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070 * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tile Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to R & E INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC. for FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-070 be awarded to R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. in the total amount of $19,749.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,· Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and~ Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. AGENDA ITEM, #(J) -ALL DISTRICTS II J" CONTRACT NO. PW-070 Ap ri 1 3 I 19 7 9 11:00 A.M. PROJECT TITLE: Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1 \_,I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $19,000.00 CONTRACTOR ADVANCE FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC. LA HABRA 'l'OTAL $18,400.00 Contractor submitted bid on February 27, 1979. Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were issued March 23 and March 27 respectively. Contractor failed to acknowledge receipt of Addenda in his bid proposal. On contacting th·~ compar:y, the Contractor stated they had sent a certified letter on Friday, March 30, 1979, requesting their bid be negated because their license did not enable them to do the work required in Addendum No. 2. 1. R & E INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC. VENTURA 2. B & L AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY PALMDALE 3. ORVIN ENGINEERING CORPORATION LA HABRA 4. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SANTA FE SPRINGS 5. VIKING FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY ANAHEIM · 6. D & B FIRE PROTECTION RIVERSIDE 7. HERZIG CORPORATION POMONA $19,749.00 $23,780.00 $25,428.00 $26,100.00 $26,142.00 $27,000.00 $34,400.00 I hereby reconunend award to the lowest, responsible bidder, R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. of Ventura for $19,749.00. c&::'.'.::'.1:c_j Chief t.'ngineer I concur with the above recommendation: ~~ t /) \ ' . . .-. -d 0 , 7 Vt t a LL_ __ li?dA:Harper, General Man~ger "K" AGENDA ITEM #9(0)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "K" RESOLUTION NO. 79-40 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B". of Resolution No. 79-20 is hereby amended to add position classification thereto, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-1" . ADMINISTRATIVE/CLERICAL POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary 10350 Buyer 1053B 7.45/9.27 1291/1607 Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, be further amended to delete the following position classification therefrom. EXHIBIT "B-2" SUPERVISORY POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly ~quivalent Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary 10200 Purchasing Supervisor 1057B 9.27/11.54 1607/2000 Section s. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9.CP) -ALL DI$TRICT~ "L-1" .. - Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective April 12, 1979. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -ALL.DISTRICTS "L-2" RESOLUTION NO. 79-41 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * * •. . . -~ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as .amended, is her~by further amended to adjust salary ranges for position classifications therein, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-5" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate \.,,' Monthly Equivalent Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary 60230 Lead Instrumentation Technician 1054A 7.81/9.73 1354/1687 60375 Instrumentation Technician II · 10530 7.55/9.40 1309/1629 Section 2. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 5. That this resolution shall become effective March 9, 1979. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -ALL DISTRICTS . RESOLUTION NO. 79-43 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF EASEMENT Dff DS TO . CITY OF COSTA MESA RE CONSl'RucTfO~'TcfV-TiYLAi'Jh--:\VF~~-iJF ·5-;ViY1{~1 DRAIN A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 or ORANGE COU;\TY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEM- PORARY CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT EASEMENT DEEDS TO THE CITY OF COSTA MESA RE CONSTRUCTION OF HYLAND AVEi\UE STORM DRAIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 an<l 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETE~~INE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain temporary construction Easement Deed and permanent Easement Deed, both dated April 11, 1979, from County Sanitat.i.on District No. 1; and the certain temporary construction Easement Deed and permanent Easement Deed, both dated April 11, 1979, from County Sanitation District No. 6, arc hereby granted to the City of Costa Mesa in order for the city to construct the Hyland \.,I Avenue Storm Drain located in the vicinity north of Sunflower Avenue and west of Harbor Boulevard; and, Section· 2 .. That the real property over whi.ch said easements are granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Easement Deeds are hereby granted for no fee; and, Section 4. That the Chairmen and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6 be authorized and directed to execute the respective Easement Deeds on behalf of their District; and, Section 5. That Resolution No. 78-120-6, authorizing easement per;nit to the City of Costa Mesa for construction of storm drain, adopted by the Boar<l of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 on June 14, 197~, is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. "N" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICTS 1 & 6 "N" "O" RESOLUTION NO. 79-44-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-1 A RESOLUTION OF nIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section. 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry and Associ~tes, District's engineers, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2~SR-l, the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered fil~d; and, Section 2. That award of contract to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the total amount of $189.970.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -DISTRICT 2. ''O" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N. ~-----~~~~~~~~- S lJ E E T CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l March 27, 1979 11:00 A.N. \..,I PROJECT T~TLE __ ~o_L_1_v_E_s_u_a_-_T_RU_N_K_~_1m_~_Ph_I_R __ ~~----~~--~-~~~----~- PROJECT DESCRIP~ION Construction of gravity sewer pipe and appurtena.r_1c_e_s __ in stre.et right of way and easement within OCFCD right-of-way, Santa Ann Ri vcr ENGINEER'S ESTIMA'rE $ 173,ooo.oo CONTRACTOR 1. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Azusa~ California 2. Monarch Construction· Orange, California ,. BUDGET·AMOUNT $ ------- TOTAL· $189,970.00 $225,005.00 I have reviewed the two bids submitted for the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair and have found the low bid, submitted by John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to be the lowest and most responsible bid .. It is, therefore, recom- mended that award be made to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the low bid amount of $189,970.00. I concur with the above recommendation: ·Fred A. Harper, General Manager "P" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) DIS°TRICT 2 "P" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0·. __ 9 _IA ________ \._.j C.O. N0. ____ 1 _______________ __ CONTRACTOR: CHRISTEVE CORPORATION DATE ________ Mar ___ c_h __ 2_6_, __ 1_9_79 ________ __ RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19 and JOB: ___________ o_R=C~H-A-RP....__C_I<E.-...L-L~O~G~G~>~s~u_a_-T_R_u_N~K...--..~C~O~NwT~BA::&.&.:::C~T~N~0~._2~-~2~0=--------------------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~ $ 5,914.96 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the.following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated March 8, 1979. ADD:. CONTRACT NO. 2-20 1. 8" PVC irrigation system not shpwn on the PlanEi was encountered at Station 11+50. For remodel and replacement CONTRACT NO. 2-19 2. 3. Excessively large water line thrust block found at Station 25+10. Necessitated the relocation of the Contractor's tunnel pit. At Station 28+25, a 36" gas main was found to be incorrectly shown on the Plans which required modification of the pipe alignment resulting in additional costs. TOTAL ADD EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time A. B. c. "Q-1" For completion of the above mentioned items For inclement weather For delays in procurement of pipe TOTAL TIME EXTENSION AGENDA ITEM #9(w) -DISTRICT 2 $1,134.83 $ 684.66 $4,095.47 $5,914.96 4 ·calendar Days 31 calendar Days 40 calendar Days 75 Calendar Days ''Q-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . ___ N/_A_ C.·O. NO. l CHRISTEVE CORPORATION DATE March 26, 1979 ... ~ CONTRACTOR: ~--~------~--~~--------------~-~~--------~~~~---------RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19 and JOB: ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20 ____________ ;..;._;;;..__ __ ~~.;._~.;_~;.._;,;.._~..:,._;;:..;;...:;~~~~:;.._~..:_-------------~--------~-- -- SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME . \. Original Contract Date Original Contract Time O~iginal Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension · ·Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 .: · ... ,., CHRISTEVE CORPORATION Contractor' June 29, 1~78 200 Calendar Days January 14, 1979 75 Calendar Days 75 Calendar Days 275 Calendar Days March 30, 1979 O~lginal Contract Price $ Prev. Auth. Changes $ Th is Cha_nge (ADD) ~~m~~) $ Amended Contract Price $ Approved: 734,210.00 0.00 5,914.96 740,124.96 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By - Chief Engineer "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) -DISTRICT 2 "Q-2" . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. N/A --------------------~ C. O. No._· __ 2 _______ .\wJ_·. _ . -. CONTRACTOR : . CHRISTEVE CORPORATION . ----~---~~~~~------~---------RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO •. 2-19 and DATE ________ M_ar __ c_h __ 2_9~,_1_9_7_9 ________ _ JOB: ____________ ~OR=C~H-A-RP~-<=KE=L=L=O=G~G~)-=-SU~B~-~T~R=U~NK~,~C=O~NT--.;;RA~C~T:.....:.N~0~ • ....;;;.2-~2~0~----------------------- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ 12 ,415. 50 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions .from the contract price are h~reby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: (Contract No. 2-19) Item No. Unit Description 6 L.F. 54" casing 7 L.F. 27" V.C.P. DEDUCT: (Contract No. 2-19) 5 L.F. 27" V.C.P. 13 EACH Sewer Supports ADD: (Contract No. 2-20) 4 . V.F. 60" Manhole Change Est'd Quantities From To Diff. 30. 30 29 29 @ 400/L.F. @ 142/L.F. 153 10 71 124 6 Total Add: 29 @ 99/L.F. 4 @ 200/EACH Total Deduct: CONTRACT NO. 2-19 -TOTAL ADD 72.l 1.1 @ 335/V.F. CONTRACT NO. 2-20 -TOTAL ADD TOTAL ADD THIS CHANGE ORDER $ll,600.00 4,118.00 $15,718.00 $ 2,871.00 800.0j~ . $ 3,671.00 $12,047.00 $ 368.50 $ 368.50 $12,415.50 Original Contract Price $ 734,210.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 5,914.96 This Change (ADD) ~IRiM!f) $ 12,415.50 Amended Contract Price· $ 752,540.46 Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 Approved: CHRISTEVE CORPORATION •By ______________________________ _ Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By ______________________________ _ Chief Engineer "R" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) -DISTRICT 2 "R" RESOLUTION NO. 79-~5-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 or ORANGE COUNTY, CALif-ORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20 AS C:OMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Se~tion 1. That the contractor, Christeve Corporation, has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for RICHFIELD SUB-TRU~K, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, AND ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, on ~-larch 30, 1979; and, Section 2. That by· letter, Lowry and Associates, District's engineers, has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has con~urred in said engineer's recominendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20 are hereby accepted as complete in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated June 29, 1978; and, Section 5. That the Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, . Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Christevc Corporation setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Richfield Sub-Trunk Contract :· No. 2-19, and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. "S"· AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -DISTRICT 2 II S" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO ·--:-/_A ________ .V C.O. NO. ______________________ _ CONTRACTOR: KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE DATE March 29, 1979 --------------------------------- JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3 ------~----~~~~~----~----~~~-------------------------=------------------------ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (BRBHgt) $ 20,699.50 In accordance with contract provisions, the fo11owing changes in the contrqct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the.fo11owing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD: 1. Due· to the age of the ·existing pavement along Knott Avenue, the detouring of the traffic, resnlting in concentrated loads, caused excessive pavement damage beyond the contract limits as specified. This condition created a ·changed condition and it is the responsibility of the District to· correct pavement deficiencies. Contractor was instructed to remove and replace asphalt pavement in various areas with variable thickness. 2. Total add this item Contract requirements include placement of a one inch asphalt overlay along Knott Avenue from curb to curb. Due to the varying condition of the road surface, additional pavement removals were required to place an additional ~" overlay over most of the affected area. Total add this item TOTAL ADD Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for the above mentioned items TOTAL TIME EXTENSION • "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(z) -DISTRICT 3 $10,937.50 $ 9,762.00 $20,699.50 10 Calendar Days 10 Calendar Days "T-1" u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. Nin C.O. N0. __ ~5~~---~----~---~- CONTRACTOR: __ ~K~O~RD~I~C~K~&;_;;,.RADO;;..:;.;;;..~S~,~A.;;.,_,-.J~O~I~NT.._V~E=N~T~U~RE=---~-DATE March 29, 1979 JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date .Original Contract Time ·Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date ' Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE Contractor December 29, 1977 365 Calendar Days December 28, 1978 10 Calendar Days 18 Calendar Days 383 C~lendar Days January 15, 1979 ' I Or.iginal Contract Price $~~,113.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 10,249.94 This Cha.nge (ADD) ~£U:Z-:i<) $ 20,669.50 Amended Contract Price $ 3, 911t032. 44 Approved: .COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ------Chief Engineer "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(z) -D1STRICT 3 "T-2"· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o.· BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. N/A C. 0. NO._· ==6=================--\w)- CONtRACTOR: KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE DATE ________ Ma_r_c_h __ 2_9_, __ 19_7_9 ________ __ ·JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3 Amount of this Change Order (~ (DEDUCT) $ 7,637.50 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT: Item Change Est'd Quantities No. Unit 2 L.F. 10 L.F. 15 V.F. 17 V.F. ADD: 7 L.r. 8 L.F. 12 L.F. 13 L.F. 18 L.F. Descri;etion 43" R.C.P. 8" V.C.P. 84" Manhole 48" Manhole 78" Casing 42" R.C.P. 30" Casing 8" V.C.P. House Laterals From 347 1,402 162 152 184 184 90 152 150 To 332 1,215 140 143 199 199 90.5 152.5 290 Diff. 15 @ 350/L.F. 187 @ 40/L.F. 22 @ 360/V.F. 9 @ 200/V.F. Total De(\uct: 15 @ 500/L.F:. 15 @ 200/L.F. 0.5 @.175/L.F. 0.5 @ 50/L.F. 140 @ 30/L.F. Total Add: TOTAL DEDUCT $ 5,250.00 7,480.00 7,920.00 1,800.00 ($22,450. 00) $ 7,500.0~ 3,000.00 87.50 25.00 4,200.00 $14,812.50 ($ 7,637.50) Original Contract Price $ 3,880,113.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 30,919.44 This Change (~~3) (DEDUCT) $ (7,637.50) Amended Contract Price $ 3,903,394.94 Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 App.roved: KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE •By ______________________________ __ Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By ______________________________ __ Chief Engineer "U" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) -DISTRICT 3 ."U" -• -"! • '...) ·~ "V" RESOLUTION NO. 79-46 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-21 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF .nm BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orang~ County, California, DO ~EREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by L. D. King, Inc., Districts' engineers, for construction of SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. 5-21, are hereby approved and adopted; and, ... Section 2. That the Secretary· be authorized and directed to advertise for ·bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date ·and time at ~'1hich said bids wi 11 be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979. '· AGErmA ITEM #9(BB) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "V" . "W" ·~~~~ FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC. 1451 WEST LAMBERT ROAD LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA 90631 STATE LICENSE # 259936 (2 1 3) 6 9 1 ·O 9 1 8 (7 t 4) S 2 6 • 2 2 3 1 March 31, 1979 BOARD OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation District No. 1 ·of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California REF: JOB P.W.-070 Gentlemen: The revised scope of the referenced project, as modified by Addenda No. 2 would require that ADVANCE FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC. entertain sub-contract bids for that portion of the work which is in the public street, since our C-16 Contractor's License does not entitle us to do public (dedicated) water mains. We have been unable and unwilling to do this in the short time allowed, and therefore respectfully decline to bid on the referenced project. Please disreguard all previous correspondence. Very truly yours, ADVANCE FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC. ~C:~aL;,k Paul E. Straight. ~ PES/pm AGENDA ITEM #9(0) -ALL DISTRICTS "W" --. v· / MEETING DATE __ A_p_ri_· i_1_1 _, _1_9_79_ T 1 ME_~ P • M. D 1 5 TR 1CT 5 _1_,_2_, 3_,_s_., 6_,_1_&_1 _1 __ DISTRICT l / ~IELSH)J ·······SHARP i~i· • •• ·--__ _ HtiH'"f-1-iiM i;NO&fOOtQ E\':O.N G Y>IAM) .--1!::::_ ---- R J LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··7-__ _ ·CRANK) : •••• HUTCHISON --__ _ DISTRICT 2 ~FRIED) •••••••• WEDAA. • ~¥. ·+ ---- RASHFORJ)) ••••• HOLT •••• CJP:. ·--___ _ ANTHONY) ,, ••••• Gl:AR"I(" • • ••••• __L_ --- GAMB INA) •••••• FOX ••••••••• ___..:!_ ---- WELLS) .... 1 ••• , •• HOUSTQ~ •••• __ .1_ ---- E'tY\HS) tJ.All> •• "9RT I 7.·1A,E\tn.df~ ---- CUL VER) •••••• , PERRY •• • ••• •----7------ GRAHAM) ••••••• ROGET •••••• ----- SEYMOUR). • • • • • ROTH ••••••• --+ ---- HOYT) •• ••••••• SMITH.······------ ADLER) •••• • • • .STANTON •••• ·~ ---- WINTERS) •• ••• -VELASQUEZ •• ·------ DJSTRJCT 3 . · r..-t j (ADLER) •••••• • .SVALSTAD. ~---___ _ ). I ~ PERRY •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·--___ _ CORBETT) • , •••• GRAliAM ••••• .__:!._ __ __ LACAYO) ••••••• HUDSON ••••• .--1!::_ ___ _ [ SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO •• · ••• ·--7-___ _ GAMB I NA) •••••• l:E-BARON •.••• _____ _ FlNLAVt8~). ···OLSON·~·~· • ../ ___ _ EVANS) ••• l\I> ..• 9RTIZ.·J~~ :ot;.~ ____ . i NYBORG) ••••••• PfH eS'f-.. ___ _ GR I FF IN). ••••• REESE ••••••• _L_ __ __ SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH •••••••• _L __ __ (PATTINSON) •••• SIEBERT ••••• ~ ___ _ ~ZOMMICK~ ..... ,. SYLVIA ••••• ·-"-___ _ \~HEELER ~ ••••• WEISHAUPT. • • " _. __ _ "ANTHONY • .• • 11 ··NJ el>ER-:-..... \I ___ _ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS· •• • ._.1 ____ _ DISTRICT 5 ~1-fUMMEd • • • • • • :ftVCKOFF'· • • • • __ ./ ---. - ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·•·····~ ---- RYCl<OFF). • • • • ·~· • • • .__L ---- DISTRICT 6 { RYCKOFF) •••••• Me INN i S-••• -~ ___ _ (RI LEY) ••••••• -ANTHONY·····-"-___ _ (CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON··.__:!_ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 lHOYT).) ••••••• SMITH .•••••• __:!._ ___ _ ntAHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• _.J_ __ __ ( ANTHOtJ~) • • • • • ·CLARK.·_' .6 .... ·-"' ---( eRT J Z~ll\9'"~0lt\ EV1dfSW~~ ·-1J::_ ___ _ ~ \~ELSH) • • • • • • • • SALTARELLI· °'._:L ___ _ GAIDO)········VARDOULIS··· ~ --;;r ----RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·.W-l a:+:AMS • • • ·-----.- DJ STR JCT 11 IT-AC ALLJSTER)·PATTINSO.N·. _A-·--- /\ TTI N SQN) • • • ·BA I LEY· • •• • .___if_ ----NTJ JONY) •••••• \·~-•••• ._£_ ___ _ 4/11/79 JOINT BOARDS ~RI LEY)· • • • • • • • ·ANTHONY· • • • _v_· __ PATTJNSQN) ••••• BAILEY .•••• _v_ -- ANTHONY) ••••••• CLARK •••••• __:::_ -- (GAMBINA) ••••••• fOX··· ·• • •• _v __ _ ~PERRY)" •••••••• CULVER .•• ~ ._i.1 __ _ 8 RTI iC) ·I ~Jf\IUOO"'tO. EVMI & • WJ\ ~~ _v..._ -- GAMB I NA)· • • • • • • L..£-&MOl't· • • _:L_ -- (WAHNER) •••••••• GLOCKNER ••• _v __ _ CORBETT)······· GRAHAM···· ._v__ -. - GRIFFIN)·.······ REESE······ _v_ -- RASHFORDL ••••• HOLT. •••••• __L_ __ WELLS). •••••••• ~OUSTON •••• _· _.,., __ _ LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON ••••• ~ __ CRANK). •••••••• HUTCH I SON •• _ ... __ _ SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO ••••• _{ ... __ _ RYCKOFF) •••••• -~-H~N+S:. -~ __ WHEELER)······· WE I SHAUPT • ·~ -- FI NLAYSQNL •••• OLSONv .. • • • • __::!__ --E'w'ANS)W~ltb .... ORTIZ:1JtM\J\Jr)tlO <~ __ MAC All-I STER).. PATTINSON •• --2::.. __ CULVER). ••••••• PERRY •••••• _·./-__ NYBORG) •••••••• P-R-1-ESl ••••• _v __ _ ANTHONY). •••••• RI LEY •••••• _v1 __ _ GRAHAM) •••••••. ROGET.• ••••• _..;_· __ SEYMOU~) ••••••. ROTH ••••• ··-"'-. -- HUMMEt,.) •••••••. RV"CKOf'r:. • •• _.J_ -- WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI._,/ __ _ \·JELSH) ••••••••• SHARP •••••• ___:L_ -- PATTINSON) ••••• 61 EBERT.···-~·-__ HOYT)·.···· •• •• SM ITH.·· • •• _-. __ _ ~ADLER)· • • • • • • • • ST ANTON· • • • _. __ _ RYCKOfF) ••••••• STRAUSS •••• ~ __ ADLER)········· SVALSTAD .• ·-"'-__ ! ZOMMICK). ······SYLVIA.····-\-__ GAIDO). • • • •••• • VARDOULIS •• _:~ __ _ \~INTERS).······ VELASQUEZ •• _ .. _. __ FRI ED).········ WEDAA. • • • • .. _\ __ _ ANTHONY) ••••••• WIEDER ••••• ~ __ (RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLI AMS ••• _c.. __ _ (VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS ••• ·._ .. __ _ OTHERS \:.!'-·'' .. ~ (7...,..-L.:: (1 ( .~ .. : I 1 r (Iv' ·' I ,._f • ./ HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER •• _L_ LEWIS •••••• __ CLARKE •••• ·-~ BROWN •••••• _v_ \1WODRUFF ••• ~ HOHENER •••• __ HOWARD ••••• __ HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH .••.• -~ KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••.•• _k:'.:_ MADDOX ••••• __ MARTlf·iSON. ·-- PIERSALL ••• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ MEETING DATE April 11, 1979 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS l,2,3,5,6,7&11 DISTRICT 1 WELSH)~······ ·SHARP·······------f.Aoe~;r-t .. ,~~t.f1\0~EVAt4S WIH\D. ·----__ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY ••••• ---__ · CRANK) : •••• HUTCH I SON ---__ DISTRICT 2 ~FR I ED) •••••••• WEDAA • • • • • • ·------ RASHFORP). •••• HOLT. • • • • • • ·------ ANTHONY) -••••• CLARK· • • • • • ·------ GAMB INA) .••••• FOX ••••••••• ------ WELLS) .......... HOU STAN ••••• ------ EVAHS) W,,t' bt ... ~l'~'BflQ_ ---- CULVER) ........ PERRY .• ·• ••• •------ GRAHAM) ••••••• ROGET ••••••• ------ SEYMOUR). • • • • • ROTH • • • • • • • ------ HOYT J •• ·······SMITH·······----__ ADLER) ••••• •• .STANTON ••• ··--___ _ WINTERS) ••• •• .VELASQUEZ.··------ DJ STRICT 3 (ADLER).· •••• •• .SVALSTAD • • • ·--___ _ (PERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·--___ _ ( CORBETT) • ~ •••• GRAHAM ••••• ._ ___ _ (LACAYO). H ..... HUDSON .•••• ·------ [ SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO •••••• _____ _ GAMBI NA) •••••• LE., BARON ...... _____ _ FINLAYSON) .. ··OLSON".·····--___ _ EVAUS)~~.1\l>. "0RTIZJ~~(I'.!.__ ____ . ~ NYBORGL •.•••• PR I EST •••••• _____ _ GRIFFIN). •.••• REESE. •••••• _____ _ SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH •••••••• _____ _ (PATTINSON) •••• SI EBERL •••• _____ _ ~ZOMMICK~ ..... _...SYLVIA ••••• ~--___ _ \~HEELER ~ ••••• WE.I SHAUPT ••• _____ _ 'ANTHONY ···.~ •• WIEDER •••••• _____ _ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·.···--___ _ DISTRICT 5 ~liUMMEL)::: • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------ ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ·------ RYC l<OF f). ·····STRAUSS·····------ DISTRICT 6 {RYCKOFF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• _____ _ (RI LEY) ••••••• -ANTHONY·····--___ _ (CRANK) •••••••• HUTCH I S~N • • ·--___ _ DISTRICT 7 lHOYT).) ••••••• SMITH ••••••• ____ _ (\-;AHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• _____ _ (ANTHON~)_. • • • • ·CLARI<· • • • • • ·--___ _ (eRTJ z)VtAUMOtQ EWcUsWlllb. ·------ 0'-:ELSH) • ·······SALTARELLI·~--___ _ ( GAIDO) • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· • ·--___ _ (RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS····------ DISTRICT 11 ITAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON·. ---·--- 1\ TTI NSQN) • • • ·BA I LEY· · • • • ·------ NTllONY) • • • • • ·\ti EDER· • • • • ·--___ _ 4/11/79 JO I NT BOMms (RI LEY)· • • • • • • · · /:,N"J'liONY • · • • ---- (PATTI NSQN). .••. BA 1 LEY ••••• ---- (ANTHONY) •••••• -CLi,RK .•..• ·---- (GAMB I NA)··· • • • • FO>: • • • • • · • • ___ _ ( ~~~~i~J ........ CULVER ••.• • __ --( l>sK>~tAt>TP. El'f1NS :Wf\J\J::l ___ _ (GAMBI NA)······· LE BARO:~··· ---- (WAHNER) •••••••• GLOCKNEH .•• ___ _ (CORBETT)······· GRl'.HAM· • • · • __ --~GR I FF JN).····· ·REESE······ __ -- RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT. ••.••• ___ _ WELLS) .•••••••• ~OUST ON .••• ____ _ (LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON •.••• ___ _ (CRANK). •••••.•• HUTCHISOtL • ___ _ (SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO •.••• ___ _ (RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ___ _ (\mEELER) ·······WE I SHAUPT • ·---- (FINLAYSQtU b ... OLSONq· ..• ·m;-__ (E¥M+S)W~\t .•••• ORTIZ·.1!l't\J\Jt\~ __ !MAC All-ISTER) •• PATTINSON .• ___ _ CUL VER). ••••••• PERRY ••.••• ___ _ NYBORG) •••••••• PR I EST. •••• ___ _ ANTHONY) •.••••• RI LEY •.•••• ___ _ (GRAHAM) .••••.•• ROGET. ••••• ___ _ (SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• ____ _ ~HUMMEl-). ••••.•• RYCKOFF .•. ·--__ \·JELSH) ••••••••• SAL TARELLl. ____ _ ~JELSH) ••••••••. SHARP .•.••• ---- (PATTI NSOH) ••••• S 1 EBERT··. • ___ _ (HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH .•• • · ·--__ (ADLER) •• • •••••• STA!HON. •• ·---__ ( RYCl<OFF) ..••••• STRAUSS.· •• ___ _ (ADLER) .•••••••• SVALSTAD •. ·--__ (ZOMMJCI(). ······SYLVIA.····--__ (GAIDQ) .•••••••• VARDOULIS. ·--__ ( \'lINTrns) .•••.•. VELASQUEZ •• ---- (FR I ED).· • • • • • • • ~JEDAA. • • • • • ___ _ (ANTHONY).······ WI EDER.···· ___ _ (RYCKOFF) ••••••• \'H LLI AMS ••• ___ _ (VELASQUEZ) ••••• \~INTERS ••• ·• ___ _ OTHERS HARPER •... ·--- SYLVESTfR .. --~-­ LEWIS ••... ·-- CLAi~KE ••••• __ _ BRO\'HL ••••• __ _ VIOODRUFF ••• __ _ HOHENER •••• __ _ HO\'U1,rrn •••.• __ HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH ..•••• __ KEN'.!EY ••••• __ LYNSH .••••• __ MJ\D:lOX ••.•• __ MARTIIJSON •• __ PI E;~S/\LL .•• __ STE'.' El !S •••• Tf~A·1rns •.•• __ MEETING DATE __ A_p_ri_· 1_1_1_, _1_9_7_9_ TIME 7 :30 P .M. Di STRICTS_1_,_2_,3_,_s_,_6_, 7_&_1_1 __ DISTRICT 1 WELSH)J ·······SHARP i~i· • • • -~ -- f.A.lii....-;.., i;IUO&IOOtQ E'tsa.m; ~AU> ._w_ ---- RI LEY). ••••••• ANTHONY ••••• ~ _ __ · CRANK) : • • • • HUTCH I SON ~ -__ DISTRICT 2 ~FR I ED) .••••••• WEDAA • • • •••• ----1£ ---- RASH FORD) ••••• HOLT ••••••• -~ ___ _ ANTHONY) 4 ••••• ~ • ••••• -~ ---- GAMB INA) ••• •• .FOX.······· ·v---- WELLS) .... 1 ••• , ... HOUSTQ~ •••• ·------ E'HdtS) tJ.A\U> ... , BRT I Z·~~'E\(n.(SJ'_llQ.,, ---- CUL VER) •••••• "PERRY •• · ••••• ~ ---- GRAHAM) ........ ROGET ••••••• ~ ---- SEYMOUR)· • • • • • ROTH • • • •••• ~ ---- HOYT J •••• • • • • • SM I TH • ••••• ·--1.£. __ __ ADLER) •••• ••• -STANTON •••• ·~ __ -- WINTERS).···· .VELASQUEZ •• ·~ ---- DJSTRJCT 3 . (ADLER).· .•.•. · .SVALSTAD • • · -~ ___ _ (PERRY). ••••••• CULVER •••••• ~ ___ _ (CORBETT)., •••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ ___ _ (LACAYO) ••••• , • HUDSON ....... ....tJ.L ___ _ [ SEITZ) •••••• ,. LASZLO •• · ..... Jt!!!:: ___ _ GAMBINA) •••••• ' E P 0 AQM .••• ~ ___ _ FINLAV~~····OLSON-~··)Jt:~ ~ ___ r'Hdf5) ... Q)> •• "BRTIZ.·J~tf\ ••• ~ __ . ~ NYBORG) ••••••• PR I l!iT •••••• ~ ___ _ GRIFFIN). ••••• REESE. ....... ~ ___ _ SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH ........ ~ ___ _ (PATTINSON) •••• SIEBERT ...... 0-___ _ !ZOMMICK~ ..... ,.SY.LVIA •••••• .....---___ _ WHEELER ~ .·.,. ••• WEISHAUPT ••• Jt!!!:: _· __ _ .ANTHONY • • .. 'I • • \'{] l!BE A ......• ....JL::_ __ __ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS •• ·.·~ ___ _ DISTRICT 5 ~fiUMMELJ • • • • • • ·ft I CIEBFF • • • • • V ---. _ ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ·~ ---- RYC l<OFF) • • • • • • MftA~S3 • • • • ·~ ---- DISTRICT 6 ( ivci<oFF). ••••• ue um i e .... ""' ___ _ ( RJ LE~) ••.•••••• ANTHONY····~ ___ _ (CRANK) •••••••• HUTCH I SON··~ ___ _ DISTRICT_.1 HOYT -:--) ••••••• SM I TH ••••••• ~ ___ _ WAHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• ~ ___ _ ( /\NTHOtJ~J • • • • • ·eb\RIE,.,. \~6"-." -~ --Ce!n1znri1t,~~oto.ev,;usw,,~ ._. o.... ____ _ ~WELSH)········SALTARE. LLI·· ~ GAIDO)········VARDOULIS···~ ==== ==== RYCKOFF) • • • • • WI bbl nus ... ··~ __ --.- DISTRJCT 11 -MAC ALLl STER). PATT I NSON.. a..--·--- ?/\TTl NSQN) ····BAILEY·· •••• ...,...---__ -- /\!HI IONY J • • • • • \''.I EiER • • •• ·~ ___ _ 4/11/79 JOINT BOARDS ~RI LEY)········· ANTHONY···· V' -- PATTJ NSQN) ..... BA I LEY ... · · ~ -- ANTHONY) ••••••• CLARK ••••• • ..::=._ -- (GAMB l NA) ••••••. FOX········ V' __ !PERRY)" •••••••• CULVER ••• ~-~ -- ORTJZ) .1~J't\l\tOO\O. E't'AN&.WJ\~~~ -- GAMB I NA) • • • • • • • r.-E BARBN • • ftllll"' -· - WAHNER). ••••••• GLOCKNER... V"' -- CORBETT)······· GRAHAM·····~ -- GRI FFJN) ·······REESE······ ~ -- RASHFORD). ••••• HOLT....... V __ WELLS) ••••••••• YOUSTON •••• ~ __ LACAYO). ........ HUDSON ••••• ___ _ CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON.-~ __ SEITZ) ....•.... LASZLO ...•. ~ __ RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS •• ·-=-__ WHEELER)· • • • • • ·WE I SHAU PT· • 7 -- F INLAYSQNL •••• OLSONv,.·. • • ----EVAl~S) Wl\~b .•. ORTIZ: 1Jt.N\ltfrl~-­ MAC AL~ISTERL .PATTINSON •• OJ __ CULVER). ••••••. PERRY ••••• -~ __ NYBORG) •••••••• PRil!GT: ••• ·~ __ ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••••• ___ _ GRAHAM) •••••••• ROGET •••••• ~ __ SEYMOUR) ••••••. ROTH. • • • • • • __ HUMMELL ••••••• RYOIGQFli.. • • __ WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI. ~ __ \·JELSH) ••••••••• SHARP..... • ~ __ PATTINSOf~) ••••• GI EBERT.···-===-__ HOYT) ••• • •••••• SMITH.····· ........--__ ~ADLER) ••••••••• STANTON •••• ~ __ RYCKOfF). • • • • • • STR.O.blf!i5j. • • ·-~-__ ADLER). • ••••••• SVALSTAD. • • """' __ I ZOMMI CK)·····.· SYLVIA ••••• ~ __ GA IDO) • • • • • ••• • VARDOULI S •• ~ __ \•lJ NTERS) • •••••• VELASQUEZ •• ~ __ FRI ED).·····.·. WEDAA. • •••• ._,,,. __ ANTHONY) ••••••• ',#lEBER ••••• ~ __ (RYCKOFF) ••••••• HILLIA'19 ••• ~ -- (VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS.... ._....., __ OTHERS , HARPER •.••• __ ~ SYLVESTER •• __ \~ LEHIS •••••• _ ' CLARKE ...• ·--- BROWN ••••• ·-- WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER •••• __ Hm~ARD ••••• __ HU?ff ••••••• __ KEITH .••••• __ KENMEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••••• __ MADDOX ••••• __ MART I l·iSON •• __ PIERSALL ••• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ MEETJr~G DATE April 11 , 1979 TI ME 7:30 P .M. ~~~~~~~- i11 ST R ICT S 1 ,2 ,3,5,6,7&11 u ~~~~~~~~ DISTRICT 1 ·-~ \•/ELSH )J •• • • • • -SH/\RP \..:i· · · • ·------J~&IOQtqEVAN& .VY'A~ · a_,, ---- RI LEY) .••••.•• ANTHONY ••••• ~ ___ _ · CRANK) .•••• HUTCH l SON -1L.. ___ _ DISTRICT 2 !FRIED) .••••••• WEDAA· •••••• _L ___ _ RASHFORp) ••••• HOLT ••••••• -~ ___ _ ANTHO NY ) ••••• -~· ••••• -~ ----(GAM3 ll~A ) •.•••• FOX •..•.••• ·~ ___ _ WELLS)\.i ••• , •• HOUSTQJ'.l .••• ·~--__ EYAI~ 9) ~.A~t> .. , 9FlT I Z·JA~f\t<'iJSr~ ---- CUL VE R) ...••• ,PERRY .••••. :~ ---- GRAHAM) .•••••• ROGET .•.•••• ------ SEYI·:OUR)· • • • • • ROTH • • • • · • -~ ---- HOYT) •• ••••••· SMJ TH· ••••• -~ ___ _ ADLE R) •••• ••• .STANTO N ••••• iZ./---__ \flNTER S ) •• ···-VE LA SQ UEZ •• ·-~-___ _ f ;Ds::RirT. -~ ... -S VA L STAD •••• ~---- ( )" ~PE RRY ..•••••• CULVER •••••• 15 ... ---- CORBETT)., •••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ ___ _ LAC AYO) ••••.•• HUDSON •••••• LY" ___ _ lSEITZ) ..•.•••• LASZ LO •.•••• ~ C:iAMBI NA) •.••.• t!t?n~.R6# ..• -~ ---- Fl NLAY (S~) ····OLSON-~·~· •• O"t'O.fi == == ~) ... ~l> .. ,OFlTIZ .. J~ .. ~ oO--' . 1 NYI30RG)1. ,-.-.7-• ._f'/.. ~R4 E ST •.•.•• ~ == == GRIFFIN .....• REESE. ..•.•• _iL_.. ___ _ SEYMOUR ..••.. ROTH ..•..•.• ~ 1(PATTIN S~N) •••• 3JEBERT •• ···~ == == ZOMMIC K ~ •• ~.,.SYLVIA ••.••• \~HEELER •••••. WEISHAUPT ••• Ji:?==== "ANTHONY • · • , • • WJ:EOCR .•...• ~ VELAS QUEZ) •••• WINTERS ••••• _-V_ == == DISTRICT 5 !liLJMMEL)~ • • • ·fM:lfo i I · • · •. V ___ _ ANTHO NY)····· ·RILEY ······· l/' --_· _ RYC l\QFF) •• • • • • Sif".iR~l:J S S • • • • • V ___ _ DISTRICT 6 (R-YCKOFF) .••••• Me::>-!~ •••• ~ ___ _ ( R l L EY) .••••••• ANTHONY· • • • • r::-___ _ ( CHANK) •••••••• HU T CH l SON · • ·--___ _ DISTRICT 7 ~OY_:_t:-)-.•••••• SMIT~ .••.••. i/ ___ _ (l•i AH,~c:R • • • • • •• GLOCK NER ••.• V- ( /\NTH m.IJ'.) • • • • • -~\·, i · · · · .-;;;T ---- ( eRT l l)ll\~~~010.~w~~.b. 0-' ---- (1-:E L SH) • ·······SALTAREL LI· ·--V----- ( G/\IDO) ••.•.••• VA!rnouu S ·. -~== == (RYC KOFF) •..••• \~~····~--__ DLSTRBl11 IT f..c ALLI STER)·P/'.TTIN SON·. ~-·-__ /\TTJ NSQN ) .... BAILEY·· ..•• ~ NT! l ONY ) •••••. W:l H H:j;1 •••••• ,/ == == ~/1117 9 JO I NT BOMWS iRJLEY). ·······-ANT HONY···· ~ __ PATTI NSQN ) •••.. BA IL EY .... -~ -- /\IHH ONY ) ..•.•.. CL AR K ...... C::::u __ (G/\MBIN/\) •••.••. Fo x .•..•... l / -- (PERRY)tj· ·······C UL V ER .•.•. 1/7" -- (ORT l l) .JF\Jl"l~IO O\.C! E\'i'lill S ,WA ~b. ~ __ (GAM B I NJ\). ······.1.o--tit~---~ -- (WAH NER) .••.••.. GL OC KNER ... /,,/ __ !COR B ETT)······ · GR/\HAM· • · • · _iL. __ GRIFFIN) .••••. ·R EESE ·· ..•. V __ RASHFORD) .•••.. HO L T •.••.•• 1i'f7""' WE LL S) .••.•.••. ~W U S T O N •••. =z -- !LACAYO) •..•.•.. HUDSON ..••. ~ == CRAN K ) .••••..•. HU T CH I SON •. ......1:L_ __ SEJTZ) ..•.••.•. L AS ZLO ••.• -~-­ RYC KOFF) •.••••. tie" IN NI S .•. ~-­ \'iHEELER) ·······WE I SHAU PT ··---- (FINLAYSQN) ••••• OL SON v,: ••• /,,/ __ EVl'\11'5) WE\~.b ... ORT I l: 1Jt.H\.J\tt)Dl0 ~-­ MAC All-I STER ) •. PA T TINS OIL. ~ __ CULVE R ) ••...••. PERRY .•..•• ~-­ NYBORG) •••.•••• P.~ •..• -~ ·-- ANTHO NY ) ••••.•. RIL EY ••.••. ~ __ G R A~AM ) .•.••.•• RO GET •.•.•• ~ __ SEYl·10UR ) .•..•.. RO TH •••..•. ___ _ HU MMEL) •..••••• R~~-.•• i..../ __ HELSH) ••••••••. S ALTA R E L LI-~ __ \·IELSH) .••.••••• SHA RP ••.••• --1.L.. __ P/\TTI NSOH) ••..• 6JEBE RT ..•• _.. __ HOYT) .....••••• SMITH .• ·... i7 __ iADLE R) ..••••.•• STAIH ON .... ~ __ RYCKOFF). ·. · • •• -&ifiR~ .•.• ___ _ ADLER) •..•••••. SVALS TAD ..• -1:::::._ __ ( Z OMM I CK ). ·• ••.. SYL V I A ..•.• _L __ (GAIDO) ...•.••.. V ARDOUL IS .. ~-- !\·/JNTE RS) ...•••. VEL ASQUEZ.. __ F R I ED ).····· •• • \t/ED AA. • .•. -~-­ AN T HONY).······ I,_,, I EDE R ..... ___:.:::: __ (RYC KOFF) •.•••.. \·ll LLI AM S ··· z -- (VELA SQU EZ) .•••. l~I NT E RS .... __ OTHERS ~~ HA RPER •.... __ SY L VE ST ER .. __ LEYJIS .•.... __ CLA RKE ..... __ _ BRO"l'/I~ •..... __ \·IO ODRU F F ..• __ HOHENER .•.• __ Hm/ARD ••... __ HLHH ..•...• l ~E!T li ...... __ KENl !E Y ••..• L YIK H ..... . Mf,D DOX .•.. ··- MARTI I i SON .. __ PJ Ef'.S/\L L .•• __ ST E\'El !S •... T f\A V ERS •.•• APRIL 11, 1979, MTG . NOTES t"'trr Griffin introduced new Director Lester Reese, Gambina i ntr oduced returning Director Don Fox and Winters advised Ve lasquez was the new mayor in Fullerton. (7-a) Report of the Joint Chairman Saltarelli called an Executive Commi ttee meeting f or Apri l 25th and invited Directors Culver and Bailey to attend. Reported t hat the E.C. will be considering the staff's recommendat i ons re l at i v e to the remaining steps to complete the EPA Environmenta l Impac t Statement to add the needed capacity to the Treatment Plan t s . Sa i d t h e staff and the Districts' EIS consultant will be meeting with San Francisco EPA personne l next Wednesday, April 1 8th . (7-b) Report of the General Manager Said he had some bad news. Was in Washington, D .C. l a s t month and appropriations are the big thing now. In 1977 Co ngress allo cated $5 billion of which $5 00 million was for California each ye ar. The administration recommended $3.8 billion and thoug ht that i t would go through. However, last month deci ded EPA hadn't spent the money allocated to them in the last years so they recommended z e ro budget for this year. Senate recommended $2~ billion. Hearings are still continuing. May change EPA's mind about ocean wa ivers. S aid in California alone if everybody has to put in seco n dary tre a tment, are looking at over one-half billion dollars. Also, was called by Executive Officer of Regiona l Board yesterday and he informed FAH that there was goin g to be a hearing on Ap ri l 27th and he was recommending a cease and desist order against t h e Districts for failure to meet solids handling faci lities requirements. Because of lack of place for sludge, have l et th e solids disposal go to th e ocean. FAH said he thinks we have adequate information and with Coyote landfill don't expect too much of a problem. Apparentl y , they think we shouldn't be taking sludge from other people in the Coun ty because we haven't been able to handle it. What we have been t aking isn 't much but to the Regional Board don't think we sho uld take anybody elses. We can meet our requirements when we centrifuge . We ge t 30 0 y ards of sludge per day and have to do something with it . Have bo ught the equipment and when it is dry, it works very well. Our contractor is working at the landfill site. Expects to have burm up and catch basin all installed within about two weeks. These are Regiona l Board 's requirements. The reason why we are in troub l e is becaus e Re g ional Board went after our contractor, Golden West Fertilizer, an d h e lost his lease. Added that in a few weeks will be some hearing b y peop l e in LA/OMA Project, referred to notic e in Directors' f o lders. They spent $2 ~-3 million on what we shoul d do wi th our s l udge. Th e ir report for the next 10-15 years says we should continue with what we are doing. Their recommendation is to get cadmium l evel down where it could be recycled. Would have to do this through t h e sourc e . As far a s landfill, we have a solids handling grant for Plant 2 for sludge tha t wo uld be created as a result of secondary treatment. We are building it at th e present time. As long as we have a p l ace where we can tak e our sludge, we can meet our discharge requirements. Mr . Harper then brie f ly reviewed su pplemental agenda items. Said the attorneys for the AMSA group met in St . Louis last we e k o n enforce - ment and he had asked TLW to attend tha t meeting and is n o w a sk ing Directors to authorize reimburseme nt for his e xpenses. Re Di strict 7, have standard resolution ordering annexation wh i ch has been a pproved by LAFC and all fees paid. City of Ora n ge agreement now a p p r oved by city and recommending that we now approve it . Re i tem 22 (c ), in 1977 we inadvertently issued a conne ction permit to a prope r t y owne r that was going to build a house on Sirrine Dr i ve in Cowan Hei ghts a r ea and property was outside the District. In the meantime t h e o r i g inal property owner sold the house so are recommend ing that $30 p e r month be assessed this new owner until de ta ils c an be work e d o u t . (7-c) Report of the General Counsel TLW reported re St. Louis meeting. First time t his g r oup ha s gotten together and it was done at the urging of FAH as P res i dent o f AMSA and Lee White. Were 24 there plus Chief of Enforceme nt Di v i sion of Washington EPA. Met all day. Got a tremendous cross sec tion of opin ions on how to deal with EPA. The attorney from EPA was qui t e able to provide good information with regard to their pr oce ss i n g o f a var i ety of things such as noncompliance of the Water P ol l ut io n Contro l Act. Reviewed specific cases of cities who are having majo r probl e ms with EPA. TLW commended FAH as they said our ag ency h as the best reputation in the whole country on our handling of EP A requirements. Good information and meeting was very worthwhil e . C PMM report re Draft Financial Plan and Reve nue Prog ram Bill Butle r reported there are two separate eleme n ts of r evenue prog ram-- user charge and cost recovery in which we charge industry. Re user charge, have three elements: (1) residential and smal l nonresidential - will continue to bill those people on tax roll. Wi ll take a po rtion of the 1 % allocation that County provides t o cover costs of Districts. (2) industrial users & (3Wederal and State agenci es who discharge to Sanitation Districts' facilities -These industrial a nd tax-exempt users will be billed by Sanitation Districts based upo n their usage of the system (amount of flow and pollutants they actua lly dis charge ) The program will be good for the next couple of years depending upon what happens in the State Legislature and what happens to o p e ration and maintenance costs such as power costs and depending u pon d istribu- tion of County to District. We may end u p with a s hort fa l l from residentail users. May not be able to col l ect enough. I n tha t case we have an item in the revenue program with four options to cover us . All of them are somewhat unpalatabl e . Realist i cally , in a couple years we may have to deal with these: (1) Have a line on the tax bil l for Sanitation District charges. (2) Go back to water purveyo rs (150 throughout the county) and have them bill for s ewer charge s on their wate r bi lls. (3) Perform a direct billing by Sanitation Dis tricts for 400 ,000 pa rc els . (4) Go back to e lectorate and ask for separate t ax levy. None of them are pleasant opt ions but have address ed them. An ticipate t hat at l east for the next couple years, will b e able to cover expense s by a d valorem taxes. As far as industrial cost recovery, that r e quiremen t wa s levied by the government. Industrial users are required to r e turn their share of eq uipment costs to Districts an d we return certain amount back to government. We have calculated the rates . At this point there is a moratorium on thos e ra tes . It is i n t he hands of -2- the Office of Managme nt and Budget. It i s the f e eling t h at the moratorium will remain for the inun ediate future . With regard to how we manifest thi s program, will do so in an ordinance. It will b e requiring the Districts' ordinanc e to change the we we bill industrial users sli ght ly. Will no t cause us to have a public hearing . Currently Districts' staff is giv ing con s ideration to consolidation . If we have to have a h earing , will consi d er go ing to public with consolidation public hearing and deal with t h at issue at the same time. Program will requir e some mi n or modifica t i ons to agreements with inter-District agencies. Also, the r evenu e program is intended to address District long-rang e plann ing requirements . Will address annexation and connection fees. No t a requirement of revenue program but will be incorporated as long-ra n g e planning fo r the Districts . Bailey asked if there were any other alternative s wh ic h t hey pursued at all? Bill answered there really are not any . Said o n ce you accept a grant for Federal faci l ities, you accep t the lia bilities that go along . Bailey asked if they were gear e d to t he f a ir user concept. Answered, yes, that is wri t ten into t h e law, wi ll be equitable. Asked if we would have to option of going t o public hearing even thogh it is not require d? Answered , I th i nk the opt ion is always there, yes . Olson asked re exempting governmental agenci es, what about dependent housing on military bases? Bill stated that depe n dent housing is not being charged. In the past h ave billed t hree ma jor bases and don 't think they pass any of the charges ba c k to the housing. Said this wasn't an issue when th eydereloped the prog r a m so wasn 't ~ part of it. Were no further questions. Saltarelli stated it was an exce lle n t study . (22-b) City of Orange Agre e me nt TLW reported that the agreement is subs t anti a lly the same as a g reements with Santa Ana, Tustin and Costa Mesa Sanitary Distric t . I s a slight difference. Said this agreement took a great deal of time and eff9rt to resolve between the two ag e ncies. It was then moved, seconded and carri ed to approv e. (27) DISTRICT 5 -Other business Item (cc) from Consent Calendar re Big Canyon drainage ar ea -Moved to continue this item indefinitely, no f i xed time . Seconded a nd carried. -3- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE PROGRAM CD RAFT) APRIL., 1979 PEAT. MARWICK . MITCHELL & Co. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUN"I:A..NTS 660 NEWPO:HT CENTER DRNE NEWPORT BEACB,CALJ:PORN IA 9 2 660 SECTION I. INTRODUCTION Background Revenue Program Document Summarr. of CSDOC Approach Capital Financial Plan User Charge Approach TABLE OF CONTENTS OM & R Budget and Estimated Rate !CR Rates Revenue and Expense History Cash Flow Projection Outstanding Debt Appropriation of Funds Consolidation of Districts SECTION II. CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Capital Project Planning Classification of Projects Funding Sources -Historical Funding Sources -Future Connection Fees Annual Capital Charge Construction Grants Reserves Annexation Fees General Obligation Bonds Revenue Bonds Interest ICR Capital Fund Structure -Accumulated Cap'ital Outlay Fund (ACOF) Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Facilities Revolving Fund Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR) Fund Revenue Program Form S SECTION ILL REVENUE PROGRAM DESIGN Applicable Regulations USER CHARGE SYSTEM DESIGN Impact of Proposition 13 Page I-1 I-1 I-4 I-4 I-5 I-5 I-6 I-7 I-7 I-8 I-10 I-11 I-11 II-1 II-1 II-2 II-2 II-3 II-4 II-5 II-5 II-5 II-6 II-6 II-6 II-6 II-7 II-7 II-7 II-7 II-7 III-1 III-1 III-I III-2 Plans for UC in the Event AV Taxes Are Insuffici~nt to Pay OM & R DISTRICTS' ACCOUNTING PRACTICES Fund Structure Replacement and Depreciation WORK ORDER SYSTEM Input Allocation Reconciliation Work Order System Relationship to OM & R BILLING SYSTEM Residential/Small Non-residential Industrial/Commercial Tax Exempt/Governmental/Institutional INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY SYSTEM DESIGN Preliminary Calculation Rate Calculation Cash Control & Funds Management Billing Flow Charts SECTION IV. RATE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY Rate Structures User Charge Rate Calculation Determination of Individual/Group User Charges Proportionality ICR Rate Calculation Determination of Individual ICR Charges SECTION V. REVENUE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE UC/ICR Rates UC Rates Notification Data Base Refinement Ordinance Modifications Computer System Development Inter-Agency Agreements -2- III-3 III-8 III-8 III-9 III-10 III-10 III-10 III-10 III-11 III-16 III-16 III-16 III-17 III-17 III-18 III-19 III-19 III-20 III-20 VI-1 IV-1 IV-2 IV-3 IV-4 IV-4 IV-5 V-1 V-1 V-2 V-·3 V-3 V-5 V-6 V-7 SECTION VI. APPENDIX Appendix A -Letter from Neil Dunham to J. Wayne Sylvester dated August 9, 1978, approving ad valorcm system Appendix B -Justification of Parameter Allocation Percentages of Cost Centers Appendix C -Justification of the Proposed Use of Average Annual vs. Maximum Waste Loads as the Basis of ICR Payments Appendix D -Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement SECTION VII. SWRCB REVENUE PROGRAM FORMS Form 1.0 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -All Districts Form 1.1 Sununary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 1 Form 1.2 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics. -District No. 2 Form 1.3 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 3 Form 1.4 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 5 Form 1. 5 Form 1. 6 Form 1. 7 Summary of \faste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 6 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 7 Sununary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 11 Form 2.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Data Form 2.1 Form 2.2 Form 4 Form 6 Form 7 Form 8 Form 9 LIST OF FIGURES Operations and Maintenance Cost Data -Detail Operations and Maintenance Cost Data -Detail Industrial Cost Recovery Allocations Unit Cost Determination Summary of Fund Costs Annual Review Rate Determination and Revenue Program Summary Figure 1 -Revenue and Expense History Figure 2 Five-Year Cash Flow Projection Figure 3 -Existing Bonded Indebtedness TABLES Table II-1 -Projected Cap:i.tal Revenues and Expenditures 1978-79 through 1983-84 Table III-1 -Alternative Plans for User Charges When AV Taxes Are Insufficient to Pay OM & R Costs Table III-2 -Identification of Work Orders and Cost Centers Table III-3 -Parameter.Allocation Percentages for Cost c"enters -3- I-8 I-9 I-10 II-3 III-5 III-12 III-15 I. INTRODUCTION This is the Financial Plan and Revenue Program of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC). l3ackground CSDOC provides major sewage collection systems and treatment and disposal facili- ties for approximately 1. 7 million residents of 23 Orange. County cities, as well as some unincorporated territories in the metropolitan area. CSDOC is made up of seven independent Districts, each with its own Board of Directors and taxing authority. The Districts' legal authority derives from Section 4700 et. seq. of the California Health and Safety Code. Each District owns its own trunk sewer (collection) system and a share of the joint treatment works with the share of ownership for the latter based on the average of flow and assessed valuation. Joint works treatment (OM & R) costs are distributed to Districts on the basis of flow. (See Joint Ownership and Operations_ Agreement attached as Appendix D.) Except for purposes of collection the seven Districts operate jointly and as a si~gle unit in most respects. TI1e seven Boards of Directors meet in joint sessions, setting policy and givfog direction to a single professional staff that provides operation, maintenance and administrative services to the Districts individually and jointly. A copy of the joint powers agreement is included in Section VI. The treatment works consists of two inter-connected plants with a present capacity of 184 MGD aver_age flow. Treated effluent is discharged through a five- mile long, deep water ocean outfall. Through inter-.agency agreements CSDOC provides. services to other .agencies outside of CSDOC's boundaries. These agreements are ~eviewed in Section V. In 1972, Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments (PL 92-500) which basically required higher levels of treatment throughout the nation and specified that agencies receiving grants (also established by the law) must adopt a user charge program in which each user pays for wastewater treatment I-1 services in proportion to his use. In 1977, the Clean Water Act was amended and re- affirmed the need to have a federally-approved revenue program but provided some new options. The Act and subsequent EPA regulations require that all agencies must have revenue programs approved by the EPA before July 1, 1979, in order to continue qualifying for grant payments. The revenue program is required to comply with Federal and State Revenue Program guidelines and to be adopted by the governing board of each agency. Also required of an acceptable revenue program is that (1) .general user classes pay· proportionally to their u·se of the ·system as a class, (2) total revenues be sufficient· to properly operate and maintain sewerage facilities, (3) adequate capital funds be _. provided for future facilities replacement. Users in (1) above must be classified into residential/s~all non-residential, industrial/large commercial or tax exempt groups. Since their inception, the Sanitation DistriC·ts· have been essential.ly financed through the application of an ad valorem tax adopted annually by each District's Board of Directors and collected on the County tax bill, Bonds were issued in 1951 fo·r construction of initial capital facili tie.s. With the exception of similar issues in .1958, 1962 and 1973 in certain Districts for trunk sewer expansion, it has been the policy of the Districts for many years to finance required sewerage facilities by accumulation of funds from ad valorem taxes and connection fees over a period of several years prior to the time the facility was needed. Obviously, construction of additional treatment facilities is followed by the attendant increas~ in operation and maintenance costs. In 1970, the Districts instituted an industrial user charge. It requires industrial dischargers to pay for the capital and operation and maintenance costs associated with treating their wastes. Each industrial discharger is permitted to subtract from his calculated user charge the amount paid to the Districts in taxes. Tax exempt users do not presently pay for services with the exception of a few large federal and state installations. I-2 As a result of the federal requirements the Districts have been faced with major capital expenditures for facilities construction and the att~ndant operating and '-' maintenance costs for said-facilities that will more than double. The need to con- struct the above-mentioned facilities as the result of the 1972 Act was anticipated and the Districts have been accumulating the capital funds to provide the necessary facilities, most of which have been grant eligible. The 1977 Clean Water Act Amendments included a provision (largely through the efforts of our Districts) allowing .-waiver from the full secondary treatment requirement for ocean dischargers. The Districts have submitted an application and expect to receive such a waiver. This will enable capital funds accumulated for the final stages of secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 to be reappropriated for other capital projects thus avoid- iJlg a. general· capital levy against current users for at least the next fiv.e:-::years . .-If, however, the waiver request is denied, additional capital funds will be required, as well as increased OM & R revenues. The purpose of this document is to demonstrate to the California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (pPA) CSDOC's compliance with Federal and State Clean Water Grant Requirements. _, Applicable regulations establishing these requirements are the Federal Water Pollution Cantrel Act of 1977 (Public Law 95-217) as set forth in 40 CRF Part 35 and the California Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 as set forth in State Clean Water Grant Bulletins Numbers 54A and 68. The need for CSDOC to comply with these regulations results .from the Districts' acceptance and use of approximately 27 million dollars ._. in Clean Water Grant funds to construct a 46 million gallon per day (MGD) secondary treatment facility at its Reclamation Plant No. 1. The grant-funded facility, CSDOC's project number C-06-0779,is currently in partial operation and will be fully operational by July 1, 1979, the date this Revenue Program will take effect. This Financial Plan and Revenue Program is intended to apply to all other grant- funded projects subject to said regulations, as well as to C-06-0779. I-3 - - - - - - - - - - - - Revenu e Program Doc um e nt This Fina ncial Plan and Revenue Program is divide d i nto seven ma jor sections : I. II. III. INTRODUCTI ON -Outlines the overall approach taken by the Districts in c omplying with the app licable regulat ion s a nd describes the h istorical and financial se tting for this program. CAPIT AL FIN /\NC IAL PLAN -Describ es the Districts' approach to financing required capital projects, especially over the next five years. REV EN UE PROGRAM DESIGN -Discusses how th e Districts will organize and estab l ish the User Charge (UC) and Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR) systems prescribed by 40 CFR Part 35. IV. RE VENUE PROGRAM RATE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY -Sets forth the pro- cedures to be u sed in determining actual UC and I CR rates . V. RE VENUE PROGRAM I MPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE -Outlines the steps the Di stricts will take in order to bring their sewer use ordinance , accounting system , inter-agency agreements and some other elements into conformance with the ove rall Revenue Program implement ation. VI. APPENDICES sections. Contains appropriate documents r efe rred to in other VII. SWRCB REVE NUE PROGRAM FORMS -Includes copies of State Water Resou r ces Contro l Boards' required Reve nu e Proeram forms . Summary of CSDOC 0J2..proach Th ree m::i.jor e l ements t h at applicab l e regul::i.tions r equire t h e Di stricts to ~ address arc capital financial planning, establishment of a user charge system and establis hment of a n ICR system. - I -4 Capital Financial Plan Current federal law requires full secondary treatment of CSDOC's flows. The ._ Districts have applied for.a waiver of this requirement, and if the waiver is approved, the Districts anticipate being able to meet all capital need for both treatment and disposal facilities, as well as trunk sewer construction, over the next f~ve years without having to issue bonds or institute additional· capital fees. How- ever, existing capital fee structures may require modification! Long-range fiscal planning has provided. current capital funds which, combin~d with continued grant revenues and connection fee income, will be the primary source for capital funding. over the five-yea~ period. ·The plan provides that construction costs applicable to existing users; such as upgrading treatment facilities and reconstru~tion, be paid by said users by utilizing current reserves and costs of providing additional capacity be paid for. by future users through c.onnection fees. User Charge Approach The Districts.have historically relied on ad valorem (AV) tax revenues as the major source of financing operations, maintenance and replacement (OM & R) costs. In addition, la.rge industrial and commercial dischargers are billed for the added tllld load they place on the system. Since billing and collection mechanisms for the AV tax are already in place, making this approach the most cost effective, the Districts plan to base their user charge system on this source in accordance with 40 CPR 35.929-l(b). AV revenues will be supplemented by direct billings to appropriate users as outlined below: Residential and small non-residential users will be treated as a .group with individual user charges levied according to the assessed valuation of the property. Users in this category include single family and multi-family dwellings and businesses which discharge no more than the equivalent of 25,000 gallons per day (GPO) of domestic strength sanitary waste. A user in this classification will pay its UC entirely through the Districts' share of the AV tax. general levy. I-5 -Industrial and large commercial users will receive direct billings for . UC on the basis of actual flow and loading characteristics of their discharges. Such users include all dischargers of more than the equiva- lent of 25,0~0 GPD domestic strength wastes or toxic pollutants. Such users are more fully defined in 40 CFR 35.905. Tax exempt users and those receiving substantial AV tax credits will also be billed directly based upon actual use. In the CSDOC service area such users are for the most part Federal and State agencies which will be billed based upon assumed flow/loading figures per employee multiplied by the number of employees at each facility. It is our interpretation of the law that local government dischargers will be exempt. In brief, the procedure that will be used by CSDOC to determine UC rates is as follows: 1. Establish the user data base showing individual user and/or user group contribution by wa~te~at~r characterstic ·(flow, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS)). 2. Tot.al the contributions of all users by characteristic. 3. Determine total annual OM & R costs (via the budget). 4. Distribute all OM & R costs to appropriate costs per characteristic. 5. Derive unit costs for each characteristic by dividing total cost per characteristic by total flow or BOD and SS loading. 6. 7. Apply unit costs per characteristic to each user/user group's discharge quantities and loadings. Establish individual/group user charge by adding the user/user . group's cost per characteristic. OM & R Budget and Estimated Rates 1he Districts' final OM & R budget for FY 1980 will not be determined until July or August, 1979. Therefore, actual user charge rates will not be calculated until that time. In order to derive approximate user charge rates and to demonstrate _. that the methodology employed by the Districts will result in a distribution of charges that are proportionate to use, estimated budget figures have been shown on I-6 Form 2 and have been used as an input to preliminary calculations set forth herein. This has allowed CSDOC to determine approximate user charges for each user category: '-' (1) residential/small non-residential, (2) industrial/large commercial and (3) tax exempt/governmental. Individual UC amounts for industrial users based on these estimated figures have not been calculated because of the large size of the industrial/commercial data base and the fact that the charges would have to be recalculated using final budget ~ figures. While actual charges have not been computed, the formula is found in .... Section IV. Total OM & R costs and rates allocable to industrial users as a group have been computed and are found on Form 8. ICR Rates In brief, the proc~dure used to calculate ICR rates is as follows: 1. Determine the grant-funded cost of the project. 2. Distribute the grant-funded costs to wastewater treatment parameters (flow, BOD & SS) based on engineering analysis. 3. Divide the cost attributable to each parameter by 30 years on the life .of the plant, whichever is less; to determine the annual per- characteristic cost. 4. Apply annual per-characteristic costs to each industrial user based on the user's flow/loading. Since actual grant-funded costs are known-, actual· ICR rates have:been calculated on the attached SWRCB Reven~e Program forms. Revenue and Expense History Figure 1 shows the Districts revenue and expense history over the three-year qFI period FY 1976 -FY 1978. I-7 FIGURE 1 REVENUE AND EXPENSE HISTORY Year Ended June 30, 1978 1977 1976 Operating Revenue -Permit and Inspection Fees $ 2,670 $ 13,175 $ 11, 382 Service Charges 530,607 614,327 252,672 -Other 195,641 99,064 112,149 By-Product Sales· .-o-55,660 51,233 .. $ 728,918 $ 782,226 $ 427,~36 Operating Expenses -Operations $6,744,499 $5J571,143 $4,645,090 Other -·o-. -0-27,608 ·-$6,744,499 $5,571,143 $4,672,698 w.J., Operating (Loss) ($6,015,581) ($4,788,917) . ($4' 425' 262) --Non-Operating Revenues ~ ~roperty Tax $6' 041, 58.7 $3,134,220 $4, 714, 776 Interest 519,455 2,085,412 721,873 .. Annexation Fees 9,975 7,800 1,950 Other 70, 116 59,468 35,887 Total Non-Operating Revenues $6,641,133 $5,286,900 $5,474,486 .... Non-Operating Expenses $ 120,239 $ 50,537 . $--0--Net Earni_ngs $ 505,313 $ 447:,446 $1,229,224 Cash Flow Projection The Districts' cash flow projections for the period FY 1979 through FY 1983 are shown on Figure 2. I-8 l o::SCRIPTION A?PRO?RIATEO RESERVES & CARRY-OVER FROM PRECEDING FISCAL YEAR (CASH & INVESTM~NTS) Taxes: Anticipated Allocation of 1% Maximum Tax Levy@ 1.08 Tax Levy for Debt Obligations Federal & State Construction Grants Fees: Connection Fees User Charge~ & Othe~ Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Loan in Aid of Construction Other lnco~e TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING EX?P;D I TURES Joint Works Treatment Plant Construction District Collection System Construction Industrial Cost Recovery Payments to Federal Government Repay Loa~ in Aid of Construction Bond Retirement & Interest Share of Joint Works M & 0 Costs District Collection System M & O and Other Opcr~tir.g Costs TOTAL EXPENDITURES Appropriated Reserves & Carry-Over to Next Fiscal Year ~Cash & Investments) I .t' LllUIU~ ~ ( I Vcarl l Flcl l)ec!. I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. ALL STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1979/80 THROUGH 1982/83 1978-79 $ 88,619,000 10,080,000 1,'911,000 13,759,000 3,424,ooo 1, 161,000 "260,000 450,000 5,657,000 $125 321 000 29,640,000 9,794,ooo 17,000 2,132,000 8, 153,000 1 91 ,000 $ 51,655,000 $ 73,666,000 1979-80 $ 73,666,000 10,886,000 1,979,000 ·1a,752,ooo 2,718,000 , 2,104,000 73,000 5, 157 ,000 $115,335,000 29,435,000 9,765,000 189,000 121,000 2,061,000 10,255,000 0 000 $ S'3,776,000 ' $ 61,559,000 1980-81 $ .61,559,000 11,757,000 1,920,000 2·1,035,000 2,357,000 2,475,000 73,000 4 309 000 $105,485,000 28,050,000 3,299,000 189,000 161,000 2,002,000 12,306,000 2 04 000 $ 48,052,000 $ 57,433,000 I ( 1981-82 $59,433,000 • 12,698,006 1,899,000 12,456,000 2,357,000 3,298,000 73,000 4,020,000 $94,234,ooo 17,270,000 3,060,000 ~84,000 161,000 1,981,000 16,820,000 2. JO 000 $41,973,000 $52,261,000 I ( I ( REVISED 3/8/79 1qs2-a3 $52,261,000 13,714,ooo 1,839,000 4,685,000 2,357,000 3,558,000 73,000 3 658.0CO • $82, 145,000 7,3&5,000 2, 178,000 . 484,ooo 161,000 1, 921,000 20, 184,000 2 $34,663,000 $47,477,000 Five-Year Total $ 88,619,000 59,135,0CO 9,548,C:JO 70,687,000 13,213,000 12,596,000 552,000 450,000 2 2 , Bo 1 , oo_o $277 ,601. 000 111,760,000 . 28,096,000 1,346,000 621;oco 10,097,COO 67,718,000 10 486.000 $230, 124,000 $ 47,477,000 Outstanding Debt As previously noted, general obligation bonds were issued in the past for con- struction of both District and joint works facilities. Figure 3 summarizes the . Districts' existihg debt as a result of those issues. FIGURE 3 EXISTING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS Total Debt District(s) Year Inte:i,·est Principal Service Bond Issue Indebted Retirement Remaining Remaining Remaining 1951 1,2,3,5,7,11 1990 $ 334.279 $ 1,772,500 $ 2,106,779 1958 2,3,5 1999 1,386, 710 6,015,000 7 ,401, 710 1962 7 1992 509,750 1,260,000 1,769,750 1970 7 1990 1,418,449 3,500,000 4,918,449 TOTAL $3,649,188 $12,547,500 $16,196,688 None of the indebtedness discussed above related to financing bf the Districts' share of grant funded projects and is, therefore, given no further consideration in ... the Revenue Program.· SWRCB Debt Service Schedule Form 3, is, therefore, not included herein. The discussion is included merely for purposes of describing the Districts' overall ·financial plan. Annual principal and intere~t payments are made from an ad valorem tax levy .against the property within the Districts. The authorized levy is over and above ~ the 1% tax charge allowed by the Jarvis-Gann Initiative and shows as a separate item on the property tax bill. The Boards of Directors, however, reserve the right to appropriate funds from any other source to retire the bonds and interest. Debt service income and expenditures are accounted for in a separate Bond and Interest Sinking Fund (BI & S) established for each issue. I-10 Appropriation of Funds The Boards of Directors are vested with the power to app!opriate monies from any ~ source or fund from time to time to be used for any purpose allowed by the enabling authority to satisfy the financial requirements and maintain the fiscal integrity of the Districts consistent with the intent of this Revenue Program and its long- term objectives. Consolidation of Districts Concurrent with consideration of this Revenue Program the Boards of Directors are evaluating the feasibility of consolidating the seven Districts into one County Sanitation District. \~1ile such a consolidation would not result in material amend- ments to this Revenue Program certain revisions would be necessary to reflect the consolidated status of the Districts and any ch<l:nges emanating therefrom. Therefore, any forthcoming approval of such a consolidation by the Boards of Directors shall constitute authorization for the General Manager to revise this Revenue Program and its forms, figures, tables, schedules and provisions to appropriately reflect the conditions and provisions of such consolidation, as needed, to enable proper implementation and administration of said ·Revenue Program. I-11 II. CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN This section of the Revenue Program describes the Districts' planned approach to financing capital projects. It addresses the planning procedures, background, fund structure and funding alternatives that apply to construction of plant and equipment. Capital Project Planning Planning -Capital project requirements are defined in the Districts' Facilities Plan for treatment l\"Orks and in the master plans of the respective Districts for trurik sewer and pumping station facilities. These plans are reviewed annually and period- ically updated. In conjunction with the annual budget process capital construction requirements for the ensuing five-year period are analyzed and construction scheduling and financing is updated and incorporated into the budget document and five-year fiscal projections. Classification of Projects -Capital projects are classified into one of three categories to acconunodate determination of financing sources. The classifications and appropriate funding sources are set forth below: Project ·classification Improvements -Facilities to . upgrade or improve the level of treatment or the processing capabilities. Expansion -Facilities to pro- vide additional capacity re- quired because of property development. Reconstruction -To rebuild capital facilities when use- ful life has been exhausted Future Primary Funding Source Annual Capital Charge* Connection Fees Annual Capital Charge* *To be imposed only after requirements exceed exis-ting resources. II-1 Other Alternative Funding Sources -G.O. Bonds -Revenue Bonds -Construction Grants Annexation Fees -Reserves -Interest -ICR At the present time the Districts have sufficient construction reserves accumu- lated through sound long-range fiscal planning -when combined with·the anticipated -. ongoing connection fees, interest earnings and federal and state grants -to fully fund both tr~atment works and colle~tion. system construction during the next five- year planning period and provide adequate capital reserves to carry over to the next planning period. Figure 2 includes estimated expenditures and the funding sources in sumrna::ry form. Funding Sources Historical -In thP. years immediately after formation of the Districts, general obligation bonds were issued to fund initial outl~ys for purchase or construction of collection, treatment and disposal facilities. Although further bonds·were issued in 1958 by Districts 2 and 3,and in 1962 and 1970 by District· 7, to partially fund collec- -=i tion facilities, no bonds have been required since the 1951 issue for treatment and .... disposal facilities. Rather, the Districts have employed a combination of ad valorem tax revenues raised via a capital element of the annual property tax levy, federal and state grant funds,and connection and annexation fees to finance required construction. Many years ago the Boards of Direc'!ors established long-range fiscal planning which incorporated a pay-as-you-go policy for funding capital improvements. This foresight has enabled the above financing sources to fully fund the trunk sewer (with the exception of the above-mentioned 1958, 1962 and 1970 bond issues) and plant construction to date and, as noted above, essentially fund said construction for the next five years, assuming waiver of full secondary treatment requirements . Future -With the limitations placed on ad valorem property tax by virtue of the Jarvis-Gann Initiative, anticipated future tax revenues will be appropriated to finance operations and maintenance expenses, as described later in this Revenue Program, and thus be unavailable for capital requirements. 11-2 ~· The Districts' plan for funding capital projects in the future is based on the principle that such projects should, where possible, be paid for by the users that require said construction. Thus: -Improvements -Expansion -Reconstruction -Will be financed by all users through such sources as an annual capital charge. -Will be financed by future users by such sources as connection fees. Will be financed by all users through such sources as annual capital charges. Connection Fees -Connection fees will be used as the primary financing source for construction of facilities to provide additional system capacity needed to keep pace with increased hydraulic demand as vacant property is developed~ Thus, the burden for paying the cost of expansion will be placed on tve users that require such addi- tional capacity. However, fees from this source may also be used for improvement and ~ reconstruction to the extent that new users receive benefits from such projects and as an offset for past excess capacity funded by current users. The connection fee calculation considers the historical cost of facilities constructed, the cost of facilities to provide added capacity and the capacity requirements of the connecti_ng properties. The aver.age connection fee of the .-Districts,with ordinances presently in effect, is $250 per residential unit as follows: District No. Residential Commercial/Industrial $45/1000 sq. ft. w/$220 minimum $50/1000 sq. ft. w/$250 minimum $130/1000 sq. ft. w/$130 minimum 2 3 5 7 $220/unit $250/unit $250/unit $250/unit regular $625/acre Regular Connection w/$250 11 connection $6.00/front ft. Trunk Connection plus $250 $250/unit minimum $10.00/front ft. Trunk Connection $500 minimum plus $625/acre $50/1000 sq. ft. w/$250 minimum The Boards of Directors periodically review their policies relative to connection .., fees and will continue to do so in the future, making changes from time to time as deemed appropriate. . . ·. II-3 w/ Connection fees for properties in incorporated territories arc collected by the cities as a one-time charge when the building permit is issued. TI1e cities keep 5% for·administrative costs associated with their collection services. Properties in unincorporated areas pay at the Districts' offices~ Annual Capital Charge -As discussed above, given current estimates of capital project requirements, the Districts' on-hand reserves and .anticipated other revenue sources should be sufficient to meet all capital financing requirements through 1.=:' FY 1984. Each year, as facilities and master plans are reviewed and updated,·the five-year fiscal projections are prepared. A thorough analysis of the projected capital requirements will be made and when it appears that all other sources of capital funds will be insufficient to meet projected capital needs, a separate annual capital charge will be established as deemed necessary by the Boards of Directors. Such a charge would essentially represent "funded depreciation" and the amount will be determined with due consideration of projected five-year capital funding requirements, annual rate stabilization, annual depreciation, appropriate reserve level and other funding sources. Again, because the Districts currently have sufficient reserves to satisfy capital needs for the next five years, such a funding of depreciation would be inap- .-propriate at this time. .-1 With respect to industrial users a separate annual capital charge will continue to be levied as an element of the annual cha_rge ,. similar to the provision for such a charge in the existing uniform connection and use ordinance. Because of the additional loading placed on the treatment and disposal system by the industrial conununity and ~ the generally expanding nature of their system utilization, such dischargers are subject to a separate annual capital charge to reflect said loading and use. As in the case of connection fees, the Boards of Directors will periodically review the basis of the charge and initiate revision thereto as deemed necessary. II-4 Other Alternative Funding Sources Following is a brief discussion of other alternative funding sources available . .t:a, for financing capital projects which may be used, as deemed appropriate by the Boards of Directors. ... ·construction Grants -Presently the United States Environmental Protection Agency will fund up to 75% of approved treatment works and the State Water Resources Control Board up to 12~%. To date these funds have been available almost exclusively for-advanced treatment facilities (improvements) only. The Districts have received $105,000,000 in grant commitments since passage of PL 92-500. However, the availa- bility of funds from this source in the future is uncertain. Further, many of the Districts' capital projects are not eligible for grant funding based on federal and state policies. Reserves -As stated elsewhere in·this section there are currently on hand suf- ficient funds accumulated fro~ the Boards' past pay-as-you-go finan~ing policies to fund treatment plaat and trunk sewer construction through FY 1984. This is partially a result of a change in the Federal Clean Water Act last year allowing waiver of full secondary treatment requirements provided certain conditions are met. The Districts -. feel that a waiver will be forthcoming, thus enabling the reappropriation of reserves previously set aside for secondary treatment for other projects. Because current reserves have been provided by current users, such funds, to the extent possible, will be expended for the benefit of said users over the next five years by allocating the reserves for improvement and reconstruction work in accordance .i. with the principles set forth herein. Annexation Fees -Annexation fees are charged to properties presently outside the Districts' boundaries at the time they seek annexation to enable sewerage service. The Boards, at their discretion, may establish the fee· by one of several basic methods, based on the underlying objective which is to place the annexing property in some degree of the relative position it would have been in had it been in the II-5 - -District from inception. Districts with annexable territory have adopted annexation fee policies which establish the acreage charge based on the net equity of the District as of the annual balance sheet date. Again, as with other types of fees set by the Boards, the annexation fee policies are periodically reviewed and revised as appropriate. Except for current agreements for long-term payment of fees for properties that ~ have already annexed, this source of revenue is extremely uncertain and thus does not appear as a major item in capital funding projections. Because of the basis on which annexation fees are calculated they may be used for improvements, expansion and reconstruction or, in fact, non-capital items, at the Boards' discretion. General Obligation Bonds ~ General obligation bonds are retired by tax levy and backed by the full faith and credit of the Districts and can be floated to provide capital funds. They require a two-thirds voter approval. It is not expected that the Districts will have to resort to this type of financing in the foreseeable future. Revenue Bonds -This type of debt instrument is paid off from revenues generated by a charge against the users of the facilities which were constructed from the bond proceeds. They require a simple majority vote by the public. A need for revenue bond financing is not seen at this time. Interest -Interest earnings from investment of accumulated construction reserves are credited to the fund in which the principal is deposited and are available to use for purposes for which said fund has been established. ICR -Use of Industrial Cost Recovery Funds are limited as set forth in 40 CFR 35.928-2. In addition to the above revenue sources the Boards have the option of auth- orizing a special tax levy for capital financing. Pursuant to Proposition 13, such ~ a change would require approval of two-thirds of the electorate. Tirny may also accept contributions in aid of construction. Capital Fund Structure Planning, budgeting and accounting for capital revenues and expenditures is II-6 maintained in the following funds: Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACOF) -Each District has an ACOF to which all capital funds except those derived from connection fees are deposited. Funds may be disbursed for any type of project classification. For collection facilities the disbursements are made directly from the ACOF or transferred to a suspense fund for joint projects with another District. For joint treatment works projects the Districts' share of required construction funds are transferred to CORF (described be~ow), but controlled in the respective ACOF. Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) -Monies are transferred to CORF, only as needed, from the respective ACOF's of the individual Districts based upon their joint ownership equity percentage which is calculated from the average of each ' District's flow and assessed valuation for a three-year period •. Disbursements are then made directly from CORF for joint works projects. Fad.Ii ties Revolving Fund -Districts with adopted connection fees have established a Facilities Revolving Fund to account for such income and disbursements for the purposes for which this revenue source has been designated. Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR) Fund -This f?nd is to be established effective July 1, 1979, to account for !CR receipts and disbursements as prescribed in 40 CPR 35.928-2 and more fully explained in Section III. Revenue Program Form 5 Because the Districts' capital needs are funded through FY 1984, SWRCB Revenue Program Capital Cost Allocation Form 5 is unnecessary and therefore not included in Section VII of thii Revenue Program. II-7 -III. REVENUE PROGRAM DESIGN This section of the Revenue Program discusses how CSDOC "has organized and will establish its' approach to meeting applicable UC/iCR regulations. After citing those regulations, this section describes the Districts' use of an ad ._· valorem tax based user charge system, pertinent elements of the Districts ... .... I ... accounting system, how the work order system is used to accumulate cost for the user charge, discusses user charge billing and outlines the Districts' approach to ICR. Applicable Regulations CSDOC's Revenue Program is designed to recover OM&R and !CR costs from users so that the UC and !CR rates are proportionate to the use of the Districts' facilities and so that the UC and ICR systems are otherwise consistent with Federal regulations and State guidelines. 40 CRF Part 35 dated September 27, 1978 is the source of Federal regulations, and the Financial Plan and Revenue Program Guide- lines (Clean Water Grant Bulletin 54A) are the primary source for State direction on the Revenue Program's design. USER CHARGE SYSTEM DESIGN User charges are intended to recover operation and maintenance (including -.. replacement) costs _of the Districts. These costs are expected to rise sharply over the next several years as advanced treatment facilities required by the Federal law are phased into service and the inflationary impacts are fully felt. The objective of any system of user charges that assesses a charge to var1ous use classes is to assure that the charge is established in proportion to the cost of treating the wastewater from each user class and that all users pay their reasonably proportionate share. Because of CSDOC's historical and continuing utilization of the AV tax as a source of revenue, the Revenue Program employs a system of user charges based on the AV tax. III-1 This type of system is appropriate since -The AV system is now authorized under 40 CFR Part 35.929-1. -Use of the AV tax approach was authorized by Mr. Neil.Dunham SWRCB Financial Man~gement Unit in a letter to the Districts dated August 9, 1978. See Appendix A. -It is the most cost effective means of implementing the user charges since billing and collection systems for residential and small non- residential users (by far the largest group) are already in place through the Orange County Assessor's and Tax Collector's Offices. -The charges levied will be proportionate to use among classes of users. -Under this system industrial users will be charged based on actual use as required by the regulations and receive credit for applicable taxes paid. -Tax exempt users will also be charged on a basis relative to use. Impact of Proposi t.ion 13 Districts' tax rates have been steadily reduced over the years and were dropped substantially in 1977-78. Even greater cuts were projected for 1979-80 but they were precluded by the passage of Jarvis-Gann. However, the imposition of Proposition 13 has produced substantial impacts on CSDOC's Revenue Program because -Proposition 13 reduces considerably the amount of AV' tax revenues the Districts can expect to receive. Proposition 13 alters the manner in which assessments are made and taxes are itemized on the property tax bills. -The California legislatuTe has indicated that special di.stricts may be denied their share of ad valorem taxes in future years. In FY 1978 the Districts received approximately 19 million dollars in AV revenues while the FY 1979 amount was just over 10 million dollars. This reduction has altered the Districts' approach for financing capital projects (see Section II) and also affects CSDOC's approach to OM&R cost recovery. Prior to FY 1979 AV revenues collected through the operations, maintenance and replacement tax levy were sufficient not only to meet annual costs but also to establish adequate general (dry period) and contingency reserves. The reserves are used to meet cash III-2 • ISi flow requirements and to provide for extraordinary or emergency maintenance and repair needs or operational requirements, respectively. Since these· reserves have already been established at levels sufficient to meet current needs and are carried over from year to year, any increased requirements projected for FY 1980 will be nominal and have little impact on OM&R budgets . . The financial planning foresight of accumulating capital funds for needed sewerage system construction has minimized the impact of Proposition 13. As pointed out in Section II the Districts have sufficient reserves on hand to fully fund capital construction through FY 1984 •. The Districts are nearing completion of a major trunk sewer program that has been underway for several years. With the trunk sewer system now nearly complete and the expectation of receiving a waiver on the full secondary treatment require- ments, the Districts' capital requirements will be substantially reduced and annual tax revenues and/or reserves previously appropriated for capital projects may be shifted to cover OM&R costs. Thus, based on the above, it is currently anticipated that AV tax revenues from residential/small non-residential users will equal or exceed this group's OM&R revenue requirements for FY 1980. However, beginning in · FY 1981, OM&R expenses will exceed revenues based on current estimates (see Figure 2). The expected FY 1980 revenue surplus will be carried over to FY 1981 and applied to the residential/small non-residential group. Industrial and tax exempt user groups are charged based on actual use and receive credit for any taxes paid. Therefore, OM&R rates that are established by the procedures set forth in this Revenue Program will always be adequate to pay the proportionate share of such costs for these classes of users. Plans For UC In The Event AV Taxes Are Insufficient To Pay OM&R Of course, actual costs and revenues for the five-year period cannot be accurately determined at this time. Figure 2, Section I, represents CSDOC's current estimate of income and expenses through 1982-1983. If residential/small non-residential OM&R costs cannot be met in some future III-3 ... year either because the rate of cost increases exceeds the rate of revenue increases or because the State implements legislation discontinuing AV taxes as a source of revenues to CSDOC, then the Districts may implement one of the following alternatives for funding the AV tax shortfall: I. Collect a separate user charge or assessment on the County property tax bill. 2. Collect via water utilities' billing. 3. Bill users directly by implementation of a separate in-house billing system. 4. Levy a separate AV tax. The first three alternatives would add substantially to CSDOC's overhead costs and these costs would, of course, be passed on to users through a higher user charge. Also, there are inherent problems in each. Alternatives 1 and. 3 require a major effort each year to update information obtained fro~ the County Assessor's roll and turn-around levying of charges for approximately 500;000 separate parcels. Alternative 2 would require development of a uniform agreement and billing system and incorporation of said system into the procedures of approximately 150 separate water purveyors within the CSDOC boundaries. There would appear to be a growing reluctance on the part of the water.utilities to accomodate this method because of the public relations aspect. The third and most expensive alternative would require purchase and installation of a large mainframe computer and the ongoing operation and data base maintenance of such a system. Further, based on the experience of other agencies, the collection problems associated with this alternative are expected to be enormous. Alternative 4 requires an election and 2/3 approval of the electorate. An advantage to alternatives 1-3 is that once unsewered properties are identified ... they could be so coded on the system and the charges reduced or eliminated, as appropriate, or a procedure for rebates established. The Districts' General Counsel has ruled that such rebates would not be appropriate under the ad valorem method and the Boards have adopted a policy reflecting that ruling. Table III-1 more fully describes the alternatives and the relative issues involved. III-4 l I I ( Billing Alternative 1. Separate charge .as a ·Special as~essment on the property tax bill. I 2. Separate charge collected .. on water purvetor's utility billing. ( ( ( l I I TABLE III-1 ( ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR USER CHARGES WHEN AV TAXES ARE INSUFFICIENT TO PAY OM&R COSTS Probable Calculation Method ' ( I I I I I Other Major Relevant Issues 1. Subdivide user classes into sub- classes such as single family and multi-family dwellings, office buildings, small commercial estab- lishments, etc., and calculate flat rates attendant to each based on average discharges and system loading from representative samplings. 1. (a) Current Statutory authority exists 2. Base charge on water volume (b) Requires a public hearing and separate notice of said hearing to all property .owners. (c) Utilizes existing -assessor file as data base and tax bill as billing mechanism. However, data base would require sub- stantial annual update at Districts' expense and conversion to a computer tape input by Districts to assess charge on tax bill. (d) Inaccuracy of Assessor's data base may resuit in high percent of billing errors and require a customer service function. (e) Unsewered properties· could be reflected in rate structure once identified and/ or separate provisions made for rebate. (f) Maximum charge for tax collector's service is established at.SS/account or 1% of coll~ctions, whichever is greate~ (g) Low delinquency factor. (h) Cash flow is not spread evenly. (i) Would satisfy notification requirements 2. (a) Current statutory authority exis-ts. However, it is permissive, not mandat- ory fo~ the water utility. (b) Would not require a public hearing. (c) Would require contractual arrangements and system modifications with approx- imately 150 water purveyors. (Continued) l l I I I Billing Alternative 2. (Cont'd.) 3. Direct billing by CSDOC l ( l l (_ TABLE III-1 (Cont'd) Probable Calculation Method 3. Same as 1. above utilizing assessor's files as the data base source. l I l l I ( l I . Other Major Relevant Issues (d) Would require a minimum of data base maintenance by the Districts as this would be automatically done by the water utility. However, separate arrangements may have to be made with the utility to reflect loadings of small commerGial establishments. (e) Charge more directly associated with actual use (assuming use is related to water consumption). (f) Unsewered properties would have to be identified and a system exception or rebate provision made. (g) High delinquency. (h) Cost of ·service by utility is unknown and would have to be negotiated or established by code amendments. (i) Cash flow would be more uniform. (j) Would satisfy notification require- ments. 3. (a) Current statutory authority exists. (b) Would require installation of exp~n­ si ve computerized billing system and associated personnel and administra- tive costs or contracting with an outside bureau. (c) Most costly method. (d) Requires extensive data base main- maintenance. (e) Inaccuracy of data base source may result in high percent of billing errors. (Continued) l l I I Billing Alternative 3. (Cont'd.) 4. Impose a Separate AV Tax Levy I l I I l I l I I I ( I I I TABLE III-1 (Cont'd) Probable Calculation Method ·Other Major Relevant Issues 4. Based on property value 4. (f) Unsewered properties could be reflected in rate structure once identified and/ or separate provision made for rebate. (g) Expected delinquency factor would be highest. (h) Cash flow impact would be based on determination of billing frequency. (i) Would satisfy notification requirements. (aJ Requires 2/3 voter approval (b) Unsewered property issue would have to be resolved (c) Low delinquency factor (d) Most cost effective method (e) Cash flow not sprea~ evenly (f) Would satisfy notification requirements (g) Least equitable ... The timing for implementation of an alternative method will depend on (1) the pro rata share of revenue from property taxes, (2) carry-over cash balances in each District, (3) outcome of the ocean waiver application, (4) the alternative method selected, and (5) i~pact of capital project scheduling and financing. DISTRICTS' ACCOUNTING PRACTICES The Districts' operations are accounted for as an enterprise activitY. as prescribed by the California State Controller's Office Uniform Accounting System for Waste Disposa.1 Districts, with modifications for an expanded management information system. Under the enterprise method of accounti~g the Districts' accounts are maintained on a full accrual basis. ·Revenues are recorded when earned. Expen?es, including depreciation, are recorded when incurred. F4nd _Structure While enterprise accounting requires only a single fund to account for .. all activities, the Districts utilize a multi-fund approach to facilitate - budgeting and reporting a~d for identification and control of source and application of funds. Historically, in accounting for OM&R activities the Districts have utilized the following funds and will continue to do so: -District Operating Funds -Separate enterprise funds are maintained for each of the seven districts. Each of these funds accounts for the individual district, OM&R receipts and disbursements, including the individual district's share of joint operating activities described below. -Joint Operating Fund (JO) -The accumulation of the accounting data for the joint operating (joint works treatment and disposal) activity is recorded in the JO. As noted elsewhere in this plan, these expenses are allocated to the individual district operating funds at year-end based on flow and loading. The furid structure for capital outlays was discussed in Section II. On a combined basis the district operating funds properly represent the Districts as one enterprise fund. The above separate budget and accounting for OM&R costs ·is in full compliance with 40 CFR 3S.929-l(b)(3)(i)(B). III-8 - - - ... Replacement and Depreciation In order to understand the Districts' approach to the user charge it is important· to take into account how CSDOC treats two important elements of OM&R costs, replace- ment and depreciation. Replacement in the Districts' OM&R budget (Form 2) consists of expenditures for . . obtaining and installing equipment, accessories or appurtenances which are necessary during the useful life of the treatment works to maintain the capacity and performance for which the works were designed and constructed. This is in compliance with the federal definition. It does not include any capital outlay item, that is, any item that will be capitalized and depreciated. Thus, as discussed in Section II, capital costs are not an element of the Districts OM&R rates during the next five years, except as noted for industrial _users. Accordingly, Form 5 showing the allocation of capital costs to treatment parameters is not included in this Revenue Program. Depreciation is recognized as an operating cost. Depreciation, however, is not presently funded as an item in the Districts' budget, and therefore, it is not passed on to users via the user charge. Inclusion of full depreciation costs, which are recorded at approximately 6 million dollars a year, in the UC would raise the rates substan~ially. The revenues, if collected, would be used to establish reserves for reconstruction of the Districts' facilities at the end of their useful lives. As pointed out in Section II, on-hand reserves supplemented by a portion of anticipated connection and annexation fees should be sufficient to meet reconstn1ction costs over the next five years. Therefore, existing reserves will be used in lieu of building a separate reserve from funded depreciation. This approach is consistent with the principle that current users should derive benefit from the payments made through AV taxes in excess of annual OM&R expenses. At such time that financing from other sources becomes insufficient to provide what is deemed adequate capital funds the Districts will establish a capital charge as an element to be added to the annual user rate. III-9 - WORK ORDER SYSTEM User charge rate calculation consists of ap~lying infor1pation relative to each user/user groups' discharge by treatment parameter (flow, BOD, SS) to the costs of collection, treatment and disposal. CSDOC's OM&R costs are sorted by parameter via the work order system. CSDOC employs a full cost system that applies every operating expenditure recorded in the general ledger to an open work order. Capital costs are recorded via the same system but are separated from the operating cost data. Input All work order charges are entered via general ledger input documents. Every entry to the general ledger includes a valid work order number. All charges are categorized and reported as one of the following: -Material Charges -Outside Services -Labor Charges Vehicle and Equipment Charges -Overhead Charges Ai location The system initially posts material, outside services, labor and vehicle and equipment charge~ to a valid operating or capital work order. Overhead is initially posted to an overhead work order. In subsequent processing the system clears the overhead work orders and allocates overhead to operating and capital work orders based on predefined algoritluns. Reconciliation The work order report is reconciled in total to the general ledger operating and expenditure reports and the total of the amounts recorded in the work orders for the year is reconciled to the total operating and capital expenditures in the general ledger. III-10 Work Order System Relationship to User Charges In order to use the cost data collected via the work order system in determining user charge rates, the expenses so reported must be accumulated by parameter. Table III-2 shows the various cost centers and the types of operations to which they relate. Table III-3 breaks each cost center into a parameter allocation percentage based on a rationale that is set forth in Appendix B. In order to determine OM&R costs by parameter the Districts have -Established a budget/cost center conversion that redistributes CSDOC budget classifications (wages, salaries & benefits; materials, supplies & services; etc.) to cost center classifications (individual collection systems, joint works collection and-diversion systems, etc.) -Applied parameter allocation percentages from Table III-3 to projected budget figures for the fiscal year in which rates will be effective. -Derived costs by parameter. It should. be noted that replacement costs, amounting to approximately 4% of total OM&R costs are subtracted out of the total OM&R budget amount before the remaining 96% is converted to cost center classifications. This 4% replacement line item is then distributed ·to flow, BOD and SS based on a percentage allocation equal to the combined percentage allocation of the other OM&R cost elements. See Forms 2.0 through 2.2 in Section VII for these preliminary cost estimates for 1979-80. The resultant costs per treatment parameter will then be used as an input to the rate calculation formula. Rate calculation is discussed in further detail in Section IV which includes the formulas used. III-11 • iml ... Work Order ' TABLE III-2 IDENTIFICATION OF W9RK ORDERS AND COST CENTERS A. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEMS B . 1. District No. 1 Collection System 2. District No. 2 Collection System 3. District No. 3 Collection System 4. District No. 5 Collection System 5. District No. 6 Collection System 6. District No. 7 Collection System 7. District No. ll Collection System JOINT WORKS FACILITIES 1. Collection and Diversion System a. Station Run b. Subsurface Influent Lines c. Metering and Diversion Structure d. Diversion Equipment e. Pump Station Equipment f. Pump Station Structures 2. Interplant Interceptor a. Interplant Interceptor Sec. 1 b. Interplant Interceptor Sec. 2 3. Headworks a. Bar Screening Equipment b. Incineration Equipment c. Grit Equipment d. General Headworks Equipment e. General Headworks Structures f. General Headworks Electrical Power* 4. General Treatment Process a. Primary Sedimentation Equipment b. Primary Sedimentation Structures c. Activated Sludge Equipment d. Activated Sludge Structures e. Activated Sludge Electrical Power* f. Sludge Thickening Equipment · g. Sludge Thickening Structures h. Sludge Thickening Electrical Power* i. Trickling Filter Equipment j. Trickling Filter Structures k. Secondary Sedimentation Equipment 1. Secondary Sedimentation Structures m. Digestion Equipment n. Digestion Structures o. General Treatment Operations III-12 Cost Center A-1 A-2 A-3 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-11 B-1 B-1 B-1 B-2 B-3 n-4 B-5 B-4 B-4 B-4 B-4 B-4 B-5 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-6 B-7 - .... .. TABLE III-2 (Cont'd) IDENTIFICATION OF WORK ORDERS AND COST CENTERS Work Order B. JOINT WORKS FACILITIES (Cont'd) S. Solids Handling-Treatment a. Solids Handling Equipment b. Solids Handling Structures c. Solids Handling Electrical Power* d. · Sludge Beds e. Solids Handling Operations 6. Solids Handling-Disposal a. Solids Disposal Equipment b. Solids Disposal Structures c. Solids Disposal Operations 7. Effluent Disinfection a. Effluent Disinfection Equipment b. Effluent Disinfection Structures c. Effluent Disinfection Operations 8. Superviso·ry Control a. Supervisory Control Equipment b. Supervisory Control Structure c. S~pervisory Control Operations 9. Utility Systems a. Primary Electrical Equipment b. Secondary Electrical Equipment c. Electrical System Structures d. Emergency Generator Equipment e. Emergency Generator Structures f. Gas System Equipment g. Gas System Structures h. Air System Equipment i. Water System Equipment j. Water System Structures k. Communications Equipment 10. Effluent Disposal a. Effluent Disposal Equipment b. Effluent Disposal Structures c. Effluent Disposal Electrical Power* d. Subsurface Effluent Lines III-13 Cost Center B-6 B-6 B-1 B-8 B-8 B-1 lie .., - _. Cl - Work Order TABLE III-2 (Cont'd) IDENTIFICATION OF WORK 'ORDERS AND COST CENTERS B. JOINT WORKS FACILITIES (Cont'd) 11. General Plant Complex a. General Plant Building Equipment b. General Plant Building Structures c. Odor Control Equipment d. Odor Control Operations e. Grounds Maintenance f. Record Keeping g. Training Sessions h. Public Meetings Information & Display i. Shuttle Bus and Temporary Warehouse ' 12. General Engineering a. General Engineering and Drafting b. Engineering Studies NOC 13. Industrial Waste and Permit a. In-plant Sampling and Analysis b. Trunk & Industry Sampling & Analysts c . Industrial Spill Invest/Mop-Up 14. Laboratory and Research a. Influent and Effluent Sampling b. Onshore Bacteria Testing c. Near Shore Bacteria Testing d. Ocean Monitoring -NPDES e. Process Control f. Lab Quality Control g. Ocean Research h. Lab Equipment Maintenance i. Lab Records j. Research and Development *Additions required to the existing work order system. III-14 Cost Center B-8 B-8 B-8 B-8 - - Cost Center TABLE III-3 PARAMETER ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES FOR COST CENTERS Individual District Collection Systems A-1 A-2 A-3 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-11 Joint Works Facilities B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 III-15 Parameter Allocation Percentage Flow BOD SS 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 35 65 35 20 45 25 so 25 40 60 34 33 33 Overall percent of each parameter deter- mined for cost cen- ters B-1 through B-8. BILLING SYSTEM Section I points out that users will be classified according to the system set forth in 40 CFR 35.929-l(b)(4). Once user charge rates are calculated, they will t.;;.Q - be billed to these ~arious user/user groups as follows: Residential/Small Non-Residential Once cost per treatment parameter is established, the rates for each param~ter will be applied to the total flow, BOD and SS contributions of this class: Present estimates indicate that the total OM&R costs associated with the treatment of this group's discharge· will closely approximate the Districts' share of the ad valorem general levy taxes paid by this group through FY 1980. Collections of these revenues are via the Districts' share of the ad va1orem tax levy included in the Orange County Tax Collector's annual property tax statement. Proceeds of the AV tax general levy are distributed to the Districts by the County based on the ,,. Districts' historical share of the total general levy AV tax. Since this method has been in practice only since Proposition 13, estimates of future revenue are difficult to ascertain at this time. However, it may well be that this source may fully fund this group's OM&R past FY 1980 unless cut off by legislative action. Industrial/Conunercial Users in this category will be billed directly by the Districts at ieast once a year. Bills will be calculated individually with each user's amount based on flow, BOD, and SS discharged. Appropriate amounts for each parameter will be derived from figures supplied by the users. Flow runounts in most cases are substantiated .. by copies of water bills or by sewage meter readings. BOD and SS figures are verified by an industry's self-monitoring report through its' own laboratory or an inde- pendent laboratory, inspe~tions by District officials and parameter figures based on Standard Industrial Classifications. The Districts periodically verify the data as· part of their industrial source control and monitoring program. After an industrial user's group charge is calculated based on its' actual use figure, the total amount billed to ea·ch industrial user wi 11 reflect the actual III-16 cost of collecting, treating and disposing of that user's discharge. ·The user will receive credit for the ad valorcm property taxes paid (except for debt service) and be billed the net amount. Tax Exempt/Governmental/Institutional Federal and State agencies and other applicable tax exempt users as provided for in 40 CFR 35.929-l(b)(4)(iii) will be billed directly by the Districts at least once a year on the basis of actual use. For users in this category that discharge only sanitary wastes, billings will be based on the number of individuals employed at the agency's facilities. Rates will be based on a standard number of gallons per· employee at a standard sanitary waste strength. Tax exempt users that discharge other than equivalent domestic wastewater will be billed directly based on actual use. Paying no taxes, such institutions, of course, receive no credits. Based on the best information available to date·there are no institutions receiving "substantial" ad valorem tax credits. If such users are identified and it is determined that said users are not paying their proportionate share of OM&R costs as residential/small non-residential dischargers, they will be billed as set forth above with a credit for that amount of AV tax the user does pay which is allocable to the Districts. Pursuant to the federal regulations, local (other than federal and state) tax exempt users discharging only domestic waste are not subject to user charges. This virtually eliminates all such local agencies from the provisions of this Revenue Program, with few exceptions. INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY SYSTEM DESIGN The Districts' ICR system is designed to recover that portion of Federal grants attributable to the cost of constructing treatment works for the industrial users' .. capacity. The ICR design is described in four parts: III-17 - - -Preliminary rate determination -Rate calculation -Cash Control and Funds Management -Billing Preliminary Rate Calculation The purpose of this part of the ICR system design is to determine the ICR unit rate by wastewater characteristic. In calculating individual user charges these unit rates will be multiplied by each industrial user's flow/loading figures. Preliminary rates require both accounting and engineering inputs. The former will be used as a source for determining the total grant-funded cost of the facilities for which industrial costs are being recovered and the anticipated useful life of each component. Fixed asset records will be used to determine the ... final £igures. In order to ensure that the required information is available the Districts will adhere to the following procedures: 1. 2. Successful bidders for construction of treatment facilities will be required to provide estimates of construction costs and useful liv.es of treatment facility components. Verify above with staff on consulting engineering unput. 3. Treatment facility component construction costs and useful life estimates will be maintained in the Districts' fixed asset accounting records. Engineering inputs in the form of design specifications are required to determine design capacities for ICR purposes. Individual ~nd group users' flow and load characteristics are either estimated or taken directly from the industrial ~ser portion of the data base. Design specifications are also used to determine the expected life of the treatment works. Federal grant amounts subject to ICR are recovered ·from the industrial users over 30 years or the life of the treatment works, whichever is less. The useful life of the CSDOC joint treatment works for Revenue Program purposes is 30 years. As additional grant-funded facilities are constructed, ICR rates will be changed to reflect the additional grant funds to be recovered. I II-18 - ... Rate Calculation Set forth more specifically in Section IV, individual rate calculation requires -Determination of preliminary or per-characteristic rates. -An !CR data base including industrial users as defined in 40 CFR 35.905. (CSDOC will exclude domestic wastes at the rate of 20 gallons per employee per day in determining whether or not a discharger is an industrial user for ICR purposes. -Applying each industrial user's flow, BOD and SS loadings for a year to 1/30 of the grant-fundable cost per characteristic. For purposes of ICR calculation, design capacity is equal to the average annual design flow and loading of the treatment facilities as described in Appendix C. Cash Control & Funds Management To ensure that continuous control is exercized. over !CR payments, the Districts will maintain a daily ICR cash journal to supplement·existing accounts receivable records. All receipts will be posted to an ICR fund to be established by the . . ,,: ... :. ··"':~~. .. . . .-· · ·· ... ···nfS'iricts upon implementation of the ICR system. The funds will be deposited with the County Treasurer for investment in instruments specifically allowed by 40 CFR 35.928-2: -Obligations of the U.S. Government. -Obligations ·guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its' agencies . -Accounts fully collaterized by U.S. Government obligations. A quarterly summary cash receipt and investment report will segregate !CR payment and investment activity by grant and allow the Districts to monitor collection and investment activity. An annual analysis will be performed by CSDOC to determine the amount to be paid to EPA and to be invested. Disbursements will be in accordance with 40 CFR 35.928-2(a). Specifically: -SO percent of ICR payments together with any interest earned thereon will be returned to the Federal Government annually. III-19 -Of the remaining 50 percent -A portion may be used to pay the incremental costs of ICR system administration in which case said cost~ must be segregated from all other administrative costs. This amount will not be known until ICR admini- strative costs can be determined during the first year of implementation. -At least 80 percent of the amount retained after paying the incremental costs of administration will be used for the costs of expansion, upgrading or reconstruction of the treatment works, allowable by Federal regulations and necessary to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act of 1977. -The remainder of the ret.ained amounts will be used as determined by CSDOC's Boards of Directors except that they may not be used for construction of industrial pretreatment facilities or rebates to industrial users for costs incurred in complying with UC or ICR requirements. I~pl~mentation of the ICR system will place an additional administrative burden on the Districts' accounting and industrial waste staffs. Maintenance and revision _. of the industrial user data base will require continuing attention. In addition, monitoring of investments~ payments to EPA and other analytical. work will also increase administrative costs. Billing After individual rate calculations are made annually by the Districts, ICR charges will be.billed directly. Bills will be issued at least once a year in conjunction with the direct UC billing. Flow Charts Figures 3 and 4 depict the user charge and ICR systems in flow charts. III-20 l I l I l ( ( I SOURCE INPUTS 1-Pg~g~~~El I & ~%~~~I~E I MATERIAL ~ CHARGES ,.__ __ l REQUISITIONS I i ______ ··-· .. ____I ..... -·-----.: 1 1---- TIMECARDS L__j LABOR I 'I CHARGES i-- ' .____,__ _ _...:! l_ __ _J I CHARGEOUT ! TICKETS I VEHICLE j >i EQUI:MENT ! __ ~~~~~~-=---L _____ _, r·-.. -----·-~REDETER~ ), OVERHEAD I MINED 1 1 CHARGES RATES ENGINEERING INPUT- FLOW/LOAD DATA FOR EACH COST CENTER - ··---··----J -' ---- ( ( FIGURE 3 USER CHARGE SYSTEM ANALYSIS COLLECT BY WORK . ORD;~ I ~-~~~:~ ~I SUMMARIZJl ALL COST CENTERS BY :_~w~-LOAD I ~- DISTRIBUTE COSTS TO USERS USING UNIT RATES BY CHARACTERISTIC l ( l [ l I I l l BILLINGS ' BILL / USERS ( I I I I I ( SOURCE INPUTS i FIXED ASSET FEDERAL GRAt'IT RECORDS/ENG IN-, AMOUNTS RELATED EERING COST / TO !CR PROJECTIONS I ENGINEERING INDUSTRIAL USERS DESIGN SPECS/ ' VOLUME/LOAD INDUSTRIAL / REQUIREMENTS DATA BASE (ANNUAL BASIS) 1 · I I l l ( FIGURE 4 !CR SYSTEM ANALYSIS. i DETERMINE ICR DESIGN JI CAPACITY & UNIT COSTS ' / OF CONSTRUCTION BY: . -FL[_JOW I -BOD -SS '---- ( BILLINGS s '---·-· • ---~-··· , I ····-~-·--------- l . I l l ·CASH CONTROL/ . FUNDS MANAGEMENT I I I SUGGESTED REPORTS l ______ ..µ I ENGINEERING H FACILITY LIFE:~ DIVIDE !CR UNIT COSTS I i ~ --------1 DESIGN 'LESSER OF USEFU ·, BY FACILITY USEFUL M MULTIPLY ANNUAL RATES SPECIFICATIONS .1 LIFE OR 30 YEAR ~· LIFE TO DETERMINE I TIMES INDIVIDUAL/GROUPI ANNUAL CAPITAL COST 1 USERS' FLOWS/LOADS RECOVERY RATES BY L____ FLOW/BOD/SS I ----------·· --~---- '1 PREPARE QUARTERLY BILLINGS BY COMPANY I BY WASTEWATER CHAR- ACTERISTIC _I ~-=:~.~~[, -~ -~--~·= I MAIL BILLS TO l INDUSTRIAL USERS i L_ ______ --T ---·······---1 ! -PETAIL BILLING REPORT -SUMMARY BILLING REPOR1 BY GRANT (QTR) -DAILY CASH JOURNAL -SUMMARY RECEIPTS/ {JDf~~t~-~E~~~;Nt-~,---... ---SH CONTROL RECORDS DISBURSEMENTS BY GRANT BY GRANT __ ...:~...:==~~----------==--..... brOST INVESTMENT I IVITY TO IN.'VESTMENT 1 1 ECORDS BY GRANT --·-·-·--·----·-___ _... G:OST-·su~~IARY--ICR-1 OME/EPA PAYMENT I TO RECEIPTS/DISBURSE- ! MENTS SUMMARY LOG . . .. --------- -INVESTMENT POSTING LIST -sm~IARY REPORT (ANNUAL) :-DISTRIBUTE ~CR REVENU.ES.. -REVENUE SOURCES/USES ' · · --· . · ··-· . SUMMARY REPORT :-:rR~Ncfi!~· P~US' i TO I~~ FUND --1 · ( ~:s~%F~~D-~-I Ii INTEREST TO EPA~! REINVEST IN I [GENERAL REVENUES __ ··-· ________ __l-~~STRICTED INVE5.1'M~NT~-~-LE~-IB~~ ~~~~~ IV. RATE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ... This section of the Revenue Program defines the methodology for development of inputs and calculations of the Districts' user charge and industrial cost recovery rates. - Rate Structures ... At present CSDOC has received EPA and SWRCB grant funds subject to Revenue ... Pl;'ogram requirements for its joint works treatment and disposal facilities only. While individual district (collection and transmission system) OM & R expense will .. be recovered via the user charge, no ICR rates will apply to these nongrant-funded facilities. The ICR rate, therefore, is single-tier, applying only to certain joint works treatment facilities. User charge rates will be two-tiered. There will be one level of rates for collection systems with seven individually calculated rates, one for each District, and a s.econd tier the joint works treatment rate, the elements of which are the same for all of the Districts and, thus, for all· users. The joint works treatment rate is -made up of ra"t.es for each wastewater characteristic. All such rates are entirely flow related. Any user's total rate will be a combination of the collection rate for .,he District in which the user is located and the joint works rate. The UC rate structure is as depicted below: User Charge Rate Element Q (flow) BOD SS Joint Works ... (Treatme~t Disposal) $ /MG $ -------/1000 lbs $ __ _._/_IO_O_O_l_b_s District (Collection) $ /MG N/A N/A Combined $ /MG $ /1000 lbs -------$ __ __,/_l_O_O_O _l_b_s IV-1 ..... ... - User Charge Rate Calculation Section III of the Revenue Program describes how the Districts' work order system accumulates OM & R expenses by cost center. Each cost center has been assigned a parameter allocation.percentage. By applying these percentages to the accumulated expenses per cost center, the total expense per parameter can be derived. The per- centage of total OM & R costs that each parameter represents can then be applied to the upcoming year's budget figures. This results in a total cost for each wastewater cha~acteristic for the budget year. For FY 1980 the Districts will apply the parameter allocation results of the work order system for the preceding year against ~dopted budget figures in order to determine for each District its total cost for collection, which is entirely flow- related. The same method will be used to produce the joint treatment works cost for each of Q, BOD and SS. The individual District's costs will then be divided by the total flow figures per District from appropriate Form l's to ascertain each District's Q rate in $ /MG_. The joint works cost for flow will be divided by the total flow from all Districts to determine the joint works Q.rate in$ /MG. BOD and SS rates are similarly derived by dividing total joint works ·cost for each of these parameters by the total number of pounds of each as determined by adding the contributions of all users from all DistTicts. The resultant BOD and SS rates will be shown in $ /1000 lbs. ------- The means of deriving the rates mentioned above can be shown by the·following formulas: District OM & R Rate .($ /MG) ____ _,, Joint Works Unit Flow Rate ($ Districts'· Budgeted OM & R Costs = · Di~tricts ! Total Annual Flow /MG) __ JW Rudgeted Flow-Related OM & R Costs Total Annual Flow IV-2 - - - - Joint Works Unit BOD Rate ($ Joint Works Unit SS Rate ($ /1000 JW Budgeted BOD-Rclated 0 0M & R Costs lbs)= ~-----=----~~~~~~~~-'-----~~ /1000 lbs) = JW Budgeted SS-Related OM & R Costs Total Annual SS Loading In deriving the budgeted costs, carryover from the preceding fiscal year is applied to reduce the costs to be recovered. Determination of Individual/Group User Charges Calculation of actual user charges will be accomplished· as follows: 1. Residential/Non-residential Users ~ In· any given District the total · flow figures of all users in this· group will be multi plied by the rate to ascertain the individual District's revenue requirements from this class. Total flow/loading for all of the Districts' users will then be multiplied by the ra~es for Q, BOD, and SS to determine joint works treatment requirements for residential/small .non-residential users in that District. The total of all individual District require- ments plus the total joint works treatment share requlrements of all Districts for this class will equal the total residential/small non- residential requirement for CSDOC. This amount must be recovered from the share of ad valorem tax revenues. At such time that costs exceed revenue, an alternative method, as discussed in Section 3, will be implemented. 2. Industrial/Commercial -The individual District and joint works treatment rates will be applied to the appropriate flow/loading figures for each user to derive that user's individual user charge for the year. A credit will be given for related property taxes paid. Following is an illustration of the formula: IV-3 ·-- ·- District Unit Flow Rate ($ /MG) X User Q = Collection Charge $ ----- + JW Unit Flow Rate {$ /MG) X User Q = JW Flow Charge $ ----- + JW Unit BOD Rate ($ /1000 lbs) X User BOD = JW BOD Charge ---$ ----- + JW Unit SS Rat~ ($ /1000 lbs) X User SS = JW SS Charge $ ____ _ EQUALS TOTAL USER CHARGE Less: Property Taxes Paid (Exclusive of Debt Service) EQUALS NET CHARGE $ ----- $ ____ _ 3. Tax Exempt -For tax exempt users that discharge other than domestic waste, charges will be calculated in the same manner as industrial/ commercial. For others subject to a charge, .. it will be calculated individually by multiplying the average number of building occupants times the rate established per person. Federal and State office buildings will be calculated on the basis of 20 GPD per employee at a strength of 240 miligrarns per liter BOD and SS. The rates will be derived from summing the Q, BOD and SS for this group of users and applying to the system costs in the same manner as for other groups and then developing the unit rates pursuant to the preceding assumptions. Proportionality Since the same unit rates for each parameter are applied against flow/loading figures for each user/user group, the resultant user charges will be proportionate to use among groups. Individual industrial/conunercial and tax exempt user charges will be proportionate to each other and.to the residential/small non-residential group. ICR Rate Calculation As previously noted, ICR rates apply only to grant-funded facilities, i.e., C-06-0779, the 46 MGD upgrade. Thus, there is no difference in rate from District to District. IV-4 - ... Rates are calculated as follows: 1. The grant-funded portion of the facility is determined. 2. Based on engineering criteria, the costs are allocated to wastewater characteristics, resulting in a life-of-facility (30 years) cost for each characteristic. 3. Each per-characteristic cost is divided by 30 in order to determine total annual ICR recovery cost per characteristic. 4. · Each annual cost per characteristic is divided by the total CSDOC flow/loading figures for the upcoming year from the data base. This results in a rate per millio~ gallons for flow or thousand pounds for BOD and SS . ICR rate calculation can be shown in the following formula: Annual ICR Rate (Flow) = Grant-funded Flow-related Costs/30 Years = $ /MG Total Annual Flow in MG ----- Annual ICR Rate (BOD) Grant-funded BOD-related Costs/30 Years = Total Annual BOD in 1000 lbs. = .$ ______ /_l_O_OO_l_b_s_. Annual ICR Rate (SS) = Grant-funded SS-related Costs/JO Years = $ /lOOO lbs. Total Annual SS in 1000 lbs. ------~~~- Determination of Individual ICR Charges The per-characteristic rates so derived will then be applied to industrial users' annual contribution in terms of flow, BOD, and SS to determine ICR charges to each '-' .user for each characteristic. A user's total ICR charge for a year will be the total of Q, BOD, and SS charges for that year. An individual industrial users ICR charge can be determined using the following formula: ICR Rate (Flow) x Industrial Users' Q (MG) = Flow Charge $ .. + ICR Rate (BOD) x Industrial Users' BOD (1000 lbs) = BOD Charge $ + ICR Rate (SS) x Industrial Users' SS (1000 lbs) = SS Charge $ = Individual Industrial User's Total ICR Charge $ -Detailed procedures for calculating all user rates appear in the Districts' -accounting procedures manuals. IV-5 V. REVENUE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE This section discusses how the UC/ICR systems will be implemented in terms of rates, billings, no~ification procedures, data base development, ordinance modifi- .-cations, computer system development and inter-agency agreements. Summarized below - is the implementation schedule. REVENUE PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct R/P & Ordinance Considera- tions and Hearings 0--- R/P Consideration by SWRCB R/P Becomes Effective • Budget Process ~· . Establish UC/ICR Rates • Notification to Users • Ongoing Data Base Refinement • Accounting System Enhancement Implementation 0 Inter-Agency Agreement Modifications • CONCURRENT CONSIDERATIONS Consolidation UC/ICR Rates July 1, 1979, is the effective date of the Revenue Program. However, Congress has placed a moritorium on the ICR provisions until a study and determination is made on whether it should be implemented, modified or dropped. A decision is sup- posed to be forthcoming prior to July 1st. Pending the outcome, the Districts' plans are as follows: V-1 D ~ ~ 1) .. - If ICR payments are imposed by Congress, ICR rates as shown on Form 8 will be billed to individual users prior to the end of the fiscal year. If the moratorium is extended past July 1st under the same guidelines as are set forth in 40 CRF 35.928-4, the Districts will nonetheless monitor flows, calculate rates, and so inform industrial users of the charge. However, as provided in subparagraph (b) of the moratorium provision, the Districts will defer payments from industrial users so as to avoid the possibility of having to make rebates. If ICR is discontinued, the Districts will not implement the system. UC Rates Actual UC rates, as pointed out in Section I, cannot be calculated until final FY 1980 OM & R budget figures are determined. Once the budget is adopted final rate calculations will be made and implemented as follows: Total revenue requirements for the residential/small non-residential user class will be calculated and compared to that class' revenue contribution via the 1% ad valorem tax. Revenues and costs are expected to be about equal. If, however, AV revenues exceed require- ments, the surplus will be noted and carried over to offset possible deficits in subsequent years. In case of a deficit in FY 1980, general reserves will be used to make up the shortfall. The deficit will be noted and recovered in FY 1981 via a supplementary tax charge or direct billing (See· ttAlternativ·e Plans for Inadequate AV .Revenues" in Section III). Billings for this class will be annual via the property tax bill. The user charge billing for industrial/commercial users will be made not less frequently than annually. Current billings to such users are quarterly. However, consideration is still being given to an alternative semi-annual or annual billing. Annual bills will be sent to tax exempt users. Such billings will probably not occur until late in the fiscal year since it may take several months to refine this portion of the data base. V-2 - Notification 40 CFR 35.929-2(f) requires that: "each user must be notified at least annually in conjunction . with a regular bill of the rate and that portion of the user charges or ad valorem taxes which are attributable to wastewater treatment services." In the case of industrial/commercial and tax exempt users such notification will be accomplished via the regular user charge bill. That bip will show the total charge· for the user's portion of OM & R costs and also show the credit applied to that charge for the amount of AV taxes the user has paid. Since !CR charges will be listed separately for !CR users and since no other charges will be listed on the bill, the user charge will be totally attributable to wastewater treatment. In the case of residential/small non-residential users the portion of AV taxes attributable to wastewater treatment will be that portion of the 1% general AV tax levy distributed to the Districts by the County. Individual users will be notified of the percentage of the total general 1% levy taxes that are to be distributed to the Districts. This notification will be accomplished using one of three methods: 1. The information will be printed on the face of the County property tax bill. 2. The information will be printed on an insert to be included with the County property tax bill. 3. The Districts will separately mail the information to each residential/small non-residential user within 30 days after County property tax bills are mailed. Data Base Refinement The Districts' data base (see Form 1) will be refined over the next two to three years and updated annually thereafter. The goals of the refinement of the data base are shown below in the order of priority: V-3 - 1. Define per employee sanitary waste flow and load contributions for the industrial and tax exempt categories. 2. Determine number of units and employees per unit for the tax exempt user class. 3. Define single family residential unit waste flow and load contributions. 4. Identify and classify all non-residential users which discharge greater than 25,000 gallons per day or equivalent domestic waste and/or , contribute toxic pollutants. 5. Identify all non-residential users and classifr according to waste strength (i.e. strong, moderate and weak). The existing CSDOC permit system identifies all major industrial users including those that discharge toxic pollutants. In addition, current permittees include commercial bakeries, industrial and commercial laundries, soft water services, large amusement parks, major universities and colleges, State hospitals, and Federal military installations. As a consequence future additions to the existing permit system will center around the inclusion of certain commercial classifications not yet identified. At a minimum, the following classifications of users will be developed: -Car Washes -Laundromats -Hotels and Motels with Dining Facilities -Restaurants (dine on premises) -All other Industrial/Commercial Users Discharging Domestic Type Waste The first th:ree goals of the data base refinement listed above are scheduled to occur prior to Revenue Program implementation in the summer-of 1979. The process of identification of users within each classification which dis- charge greater than 25,000 GPD of equivalent sanitary waste will occur subsequent to Revenue Program implementation and will include the following: V-4 -Determine the average waste characteristics for each classification via actual sampling within the CSDOC servi'ce area. -Determine the flow unit for each class of users which equates to 25,000 GPD o~ domestjc waste. -Identify and permit each user which discharges greater than 25,000 GPD of equivalent domestic waste. -Give notice and meet with affected user groups. It is currently estimated that there are up to 2,000 industrial/commercial users which.discharge greater than 25,000 GPO of equivalent domestic waste within the CSDOC service area which are not currently operating under permits. It will take· two to three years to identify them. As these users are identified, they will be reclassified from residential/small non-residential group to the industrial/commercial group. The identification and classification of all non-residential users according to waste strength will occur after the users which discharge greater than 25,000 GPD of equivalent domestic waste have been identified. Ordinance Modifications 40 CPR Part 35 requires a grantee to adopt an ordinance that: -Prohibits new sources of inflow. -Insures proper design and construction of new facilities. -Establishes the user charge system. -Establishes the industrial cost recovery system. The Districts• existing sewer connection use ordinance will require amendments to fully comply with UC/ICR regulations. The required modifications are set forth ~ in a separate anaylsis. The draft modifications to the ordinance are in process, and a proposed ordinance will be considered for adoption by the Boards of Directors after July I, 1979. The planned time for CSDOC Boards of Directors action is the first half of fiscal year 1979-80. V-5 Computer System Development TI1e Districts have undertaken a comprehensive accounting system enhancement program with the objectiv~ of meeting all their financial and management informa- tion requirements over the next five years in the most cost-effective manner. Among the numerous requirements taken into consideration, those of the Districts' Revenue Program have been central to the system design. Accordingly, the system design provides for the following Revenue Program related requirements: -Full cost work order/cost center accounting supported by a cost allocation module. -ICR and UC billing and receivable. -Fixed Asset ledger maintaining ICR asset eligibility percentages, -Fund and account structure fully consistent with Revenue Program requirements. The system implementation plan calls for a three-phase implementation beginning July 1, 1979, and concluding prior to the close of the calendar year. The phases and their associated systems are: Phase 1 -July 1, 1979 -Payroll -Labor Distribution -Accounts Payable -Cost Allocation -Budget Preparation -General Ledger Accounting -Appropriation/Expenditure/Revenue/Accounting -Work Order/Cost Center Accounting -Phase 2 -October 1, 1979 -Equipment Billing -Purchasing -Inventory -Fixed Assets Phase 3 -November 1, 1979 -ICR/UC Billing and Receivable V-6 The timing of the implementation phases has been set to fully support the cost collection and revenue requirements of the Revenue.Program which becomes operational on July 1, 1979. Inter-Agency Agreements The Districts have inter-agency agreements with eig~t other districts for pro- vision of sewage conveyance, treatment and/or disposal services. During the develop- ment of the CSDOC Revenue Program these eight agreements were reviewed to determine the applicability of EPA and SWRCB regulations to these agreements. Four of the eight agreements (1 through 4) involved are considered insignificant in terms of discharge to the system or are not yet connected to the system and, therefore, do not require further consideration at this time. The other four (5 through 8) will require modifications over the next year to enable full compliance with the Revenue ,,,. Program regulations. The agencies and the t)'pes of services involved are summarized below: AGENCY 1. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Riverside, CA 2. Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine, CA 3. City of Long Beach, CA TYPE OF SERVICE CSDOC will provide convey- ance, treatment and disposal of up to 30 MGD of SAWPA high saline wastewater. Agreement provides SAWPA with capacity rights in CSDOC facilities. CSDOC provides 15 MGD of capacity in its ocean outfall to IRWD. CSDOC provides conveyance, treatment and disposal services for @ 93,600 GPO of wastewat~r from a 19 acre residential develop- ment in Long Beach. V-7 STATIJS OF SERVICE EPA/SWRCB funding for upper reaches of Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) is being sought. Not yet connected to CS DOC Not yet connected to CSDOC. Service has been opera- tional since 1972. Dis- charge considered insignificant. AGENCY 4. Sandalwood Sewer Maintenance District, Los Angeles County 5. Sunset Beach Sanitary District, Sunset Beach, CA (City of Huntington · Beach) 6. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) #18 7. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) #19 8. Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA TYPE OF SERVICE CSDOC 113 provides convey- ance, treatment and dis- posal services to this 17 acre residential area in a geographically isolated area of southeastern Los Angeles County. CSDOC provides 250,000 GPD of conveyance treat- ment and disposal services to SBSD which serves resi- dential and commercial dischargers in Coastal Orange County. Approximately 212 million gallons of LACSD #18 and #19 wastewater is conveyed to, treated and disposed of via CSDOC facilities annually; approximately 153 million gallons of CSDOC #3 waste- water is conveyed to, treated and disposed of via LACSD facilities annually. The CSDOC/OCWD agreement provides for 15 MGD of secondary treatment waste- water to be delivered to OCWD; and an equal amount of brine from the OCWD to CSDOC for discharge via CSDOC 1 s disposal facilities. V-8 STATUS OF SERVICE This service has been operational since the late 1960's. Discharge considered insignificant. Service has been opera- tional since 1970. The services have been operational since the early 1960's. CSDOC currently provides 10 MGD of secondary treated wastewater to OCWD, and OCWD returns limited amounts of brine to CSDOC. OCWD is currently in Step 1 of their Green Acres project, which will require an additional 15 MGD of ·wastewater from CSDOC and an equal amount of dis- posal capacity via CSDOC facilities. A joint com- mittee of Directors has this agreement under study. l 1 w u D 0 u ·--' I u u .o LI u Q lJ 0 u u 0 0 u VI • APPENDIX APPENDIX A STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Covornor STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD ... DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - - - - - ... P. O. BOX 100 o SACRAMENTO 95801 (916) 445-7971 AUG Cr 1 .. 1 3 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester Dire~tor of Finance County Sanitation Districts of Or_ange Coupty P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 In Reply Ref er To:· 552:DP USER CHARGE SYSTEM BASED ON AD VALOREM TAXES; COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, PROJECT NO. C-06-1073 Based on your letter dated July 21, 1978, Division staff has determined that the County Sanitation Districto of Orange County have a dedicated ad valorem tax system in compliance with Section 35.929(b)(1) through (b)(3) of EPA's Interim Regulations dated April 25, 1978. Therefore, in accordance with Section 35.935-13(a) of the Interi.m Regulations, any Step 3 payments being withheld at 50 or 80 percent for failure to comply with the requirements for development or approval of a user charge system are released. You shall obtain approval of your user charge system by June 30, 1979. An ad valorem-based user charge system may be approved if it meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) through (b)(?) of Section 35.929-1 (Attachment). Requirements (b)(1) through (b)(3) have a;Lready been met. If you have further questions regarding development of an ad valorem-based user charge system, please contact Donald Perrin of my staff at (916)322-6457. J/i~~-;7¥£<' ~,./ Neil Dunham r Division Chief Manager -Clean Water Grant Program Attachment APPENDIX B. JUSTIFICATION OF PARAMETER ALLOCATION. PERCENTAGES FOR COST CENTERS Cost centers have· been identified for each of the seven separate district wastewater collection systems and the joint works work order numbers appli- cable to coounon percentages of Flow, BOD, and SS. Allocations of system expenditures between these three parameters were based on design criteria, unit loadings, removal efficiencies, and other factors associated with costs necessary to construct, operate, and/or maintain the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system. Justification of the parameter allocation percentages developed for each work order and consequently used in the deter- mination of cost centers are described in the following .paragraphs. . . INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEMS The collection and interceptor systems of the seven separate districts which comprise the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are designed en- • tirely on a relative wastewater flow basis. Consequently, since the volume of wastewater discharged is the basic consideration of such piping systems, costs associated with . collection and interceptor facilities have been allocated entirely to flow. JOINT WORKS FACILITIES Collection and Diversion System Facilities contained in the joint works collection and diversion system include influent lines, metering and diversion structures, pump station equipment, and pump station structures. All of these facilities are installed for the purpose of metering, selecting, and diverting wastewater flow to one of two D.istrict treatment plants. Relative sewage flow is the prime consideration pertaining to capital and annual operating expenditures of the system. Interplant Interceptor Capital and operating costs associated with the interplant interceptor system are tot~lly applicable to wastewater flow on the same basis as the individual district collection and joint works collection and diversion systems. Headworks The headworks facilities include screening, grit removal, and pumping processes. The purpose of the facility is to receive sewage flows into the treatment system and remove large solids and debris. Due to the fact that much of the material removed from the headworks is too large to be measured as "suspended", and that costs associated with the removal of such material at the hcadworks is small in proportion to the total, headworks expendi- tures arc allocated 100 percent to flow. .... .. APPENDIX B 2. General Treatment Process Primary Sedimentation Equipment Primary sedimentation equipment is required for the removal of BOD and SS. From historical District data, 35 percent BOD and 64 percent SS removal is accomplished in the primary sedimentation process. Convert- ing these percent removals to a portion of 100 percent yields: 35 x 100 = 35% BOD 99 64 x 100 = 65% SS 99 99 100% Therefore, primary sedimentation equipment is 35 and 65 pe~cent appli- cable to BOD and SS, respectively. Primary Sedimentation Structures Wastewater flow is the basic· design consideration in sizing a primary sedimentation structure. However, costs cannot be entirely allocated to flow since the prime purpose of the structure is the removal of BOD and suspended solids. On this basis it is assumed that one-third of the structure is applicable to flo~, the other two-thirds pertaining to BOD and suspended solids in proportion to percent removals. Flow = 33% BOD 67% x 0.35 = 23% SS 67% x 0.65 = 44% Therefore, rounding off, primary sedimentation structures are 35%, 20% and 45% applicable to Flow, BOD, and SS, respectively. Activated Sludge Equipment and Power Activated ·sludge equipment is designed primarily on the basis of. BOD loadings. Nevertheless, the activated sludge process· is required to remove suspended solids remaining after primary sedimentation to assure compliance with waste discharge requirements. Anticipated percent removals of BOD and SS by the activated sludge system are 91 percent and 85 percent, respectively. Therefore, based on removal efficiencies only, the percent applicability of BOD and SS would be: 91 x 100 = 52% BOD 176 85 x 100 = 48% SS 176 176 100% ...... ... - APPENDIX B 3. However, it has been assumed that an additional 15 percent of related facility costs is applicable to BOD due to the basis of design. The resulting overall BOD and SS percentages are as follows: BOD = 15 + 85(.52) SS = 85( .48) = 59% ::: 41% Rounding off, 60 percent BOD and 40 percent SS are obtained. Activated Sludge Structures Like activated sludge equipment, the design of activated sludge struc- tures is based primarily on BOD. However, flow is a consideration in that if the waste were very weak (diluted by flow), detention time would be a definite design criteria. In addition, although BOD is the prime loading consideration, the system must also remove SS to enable the Districts to meet waste discharge requirements. Thus, cos ts to Flow, BOD, and SS were given the following priority: 25% Flow ·only 25% BOD only 50% BOD and SS If the portion of costs applicable to both BOD and SS are allocated to each based on the percent removal of each parameter, the following overall percentages are obtained: Flow = 25% BOD = 25 + 50(0.52) = 51% SS = 50(0.48) = 24% Therefore, allocations of 25 percent flow, 50 percent BOD, and 25 percent SS are used. Sludge Thickening Equipment, Structures, and Power The purpose of sludge thickening is to concentrate BOD generated sludge and SS removed in the secondary treatment process. The design crite~ia used for sizing the sludge thickening facilities is 0.75 lbs. of total solids per pound of BOD removed in the activated sludge process. This sludge production rate includes the related SS removal in the aeration system. However, some of the SS entering the aerator also exert a BOD • For every 100 million gallons of wastewater flow, the total solids produced equals 128, 070 lbs. The total amount of SS removed in the activated sludge process per 100 million gallons of wastewater equals 100,660 lbs. Assuming 50 percent of the SS entering the aerator are actually BOD: SS = (100,660)(0.5) = 50,330 lbs. BOD= 128,070 ~-50,330 = 77,740 128,070 lbs. - - .... APPENDIX B 4. Percentages can be calculated as follows: BOD ::: 77,740 x 100 = 128 ,070 SS ::I 50,330 x 100 = 128,070 Therefore, allocations of 60 percent BOD used. Trickling Filter Equipment 61% 39% and 40 percent SS have been ~he existing trickling filters at Plant No. 1 provide part of the overall percent removal of BOD and SS described for the activated sludge process. Because the trickling filters are an integral part of the design and operation of the activated sludge facilities at Plant No. 1, the allocation percentages which apply for activated sludge equipment also apply to the trickling filter equipment. Trickling Filter Structures The same allocation percentages apply as those used for activated sludge structures by the same reasoning used for trickling filter equipment. Secondary Sedimentation Equipment Secondary sedimentation equipment is required for the removal of BOD and SS from the secondary treatment system in the form of sludge. Based on the percentages determined from the amount and source of sludge entering the sludge thickening facilities, related cos ts are 60 and 40 percent applicable to BOD and SS, respectively. Secondary Sedimentation Structures As with the design of primary sedimentation structures, flow is also the basic sizing consideration for secondary sedimentation structures. Nevertheless, the structure itself is constructed to remove BOD and SS. On the basis used for activated sludge structures, capital and operating costs related to the secondary sedimentation structures are allocated 25 percent to Flow, 50 percent. to BOD, and 25 percent to SS. Digestion Equipment and Structures The related capital and annual operating and maintenance costs of the sludge digestion facilities is dependent upon the relative volume and sources of the total sludge recovered within the treatment process. Wastewater flow is not a consideration. As more secondary treatment capacity is added to the joint works facilities, the percent of BOD related sludge will increase: Year Addition %BOD %SS 1977 46 MGD Secondary (Pl) 38 62 1981 75 MGD Secondary (P2) 41 59 1983 100 MGD Secondary (P2) 44 66 .... .. - - ..... ... ... APPENDIX B s. Since the change in the allocation percentages between BOD and SS is not significant., cos ts are allocated 40 and 60 percent to BOD an'd SS, respectively. Secondary Lift Station Equipment, Structures, and Power Capital and annual operation and maintenance costs are totally related to the amount of flow pumped by this facility. General Treatment Operations General treatment operations includes the operators' salaries required. to maintain adequate control over the various treatment processes. Since it is not practical to determine the amount of operation time spent on any specific treatment process with any degree of certainty, and no clear-cut method for allocating these costs to the three treat- ment parameters exists, the operators' salaries are divided equally between the three parameters at 34 percent to Flow~ 33 percent to BOD, and 33 percent to SS. Solids Handling-Treatment Since this process involves the same solids requiring digestion, all costs are allocated 40 percent to BOD and 60 percent to SS as determined for the sludge digestion facilities. Solids Handling-Disposal Same as solids handling-treatment. Effluent Disinfection All effluent disinfection facilities are related to the total amount of flow discharged from the treatment plants. Effluent Disposal The costs of disposal of the treated wastewater through the ocean outfall system are 100 percent flow related. Other Additional joint works work order categories which are not specific to any one treatment process are: Supervisory Control Utility Systems General Plant Complex General Engineering Industrial Waste and Permit Laboratory and Research These cos ts wi 11 be allocated to Flow, BOD, and SS on the bas is of the overall percentage determined from all other joint works cost centers • .. .. - - .... - APPENDIX C JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED USE OF AVERAGE ANNUAL VS. MAXIMUM WASTE LOADS AS THE BASIS OF ICR PAYMENTS The Federal Guidelines regarding Industrial Cost Recovery Systems reads as follows: "If an industrial user's maximum flow .(hourly, daily, monthly, seasonally, etc.) contributes to the cost of construction of a treatment works, it should be the basis for that user's ICR payment. No credit shall be given to the industrial user for the time period when the user is not operating and pot discharging wastewater." Ip order to determine whether an industrial user's flow "contributes to the cost of construction of a treatment works" the criteria used for design of the treatment facilities must be considered. The existing CSDOC treatment plants as well as future planned facilities have or will be designed on a total system average annual flow basis. Design biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS) loadings are based on the amount of these treatment parameters expected to be received at the treatment facilities during the average day of the maximum month. Design BOD and SS loadings are determined using a 25 percent increase in average annual BOD and SS contributions. The 25 percent peaking factor is predicated on historical raw wastewater characteristics received at the Joint Works treatment facilities. These historical maximum monthly waste loads have not occurred consistently during any one particular season and have not been associated with the increased production of any one industry or industrial group. The draft project report entitled."Draft Facilities Planning and Project Report, Joint Works Wastewater Treatment Improvements, 1976-1996" and dated March, 1977 states: "There is no significant cyclic annual flow pattern at the Joint Works that could be associated with industrial or agricultural operations.· Because of this, all dry weather peak flows are assumed divided evenly among all sources." The above statement relates to the fact that the total industrial portion of the overall waste load received at the treatment facilities is constant (whether hourly, daily, monthly, or seasonally) and is in proportion to average annual waste loads. In addition, the specific individual industrial peak wastewater contributions of two or more industries, generally do not occur during the same time. Instances occur where peak production periods of one industry occur during the minimum production season of another firm, thus peak waste loads are complementary rather than additive. In summary, the total industrial waste load discharge, whether peak or average, contributes to the cost of construction of the treatment works in the proportion of average annual industrial waste loads to the total average annual load received at the two District treatment plants . - - ... - APPENDIX "D" JOINT OWNERSHIP, OPERATION AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT -as amended - (Effective July 1, 1970. Supersedes original Agreement of OctoQer 8, 19~8) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of March, 1971, by and between the COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICTS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, each being a separate public corporation, duly organized and existing under the County Sanitation District Act and each sometimes hereinafter referred to as 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11. W I T N E S S E T H: ----------- WHEREAS, each of the Districts, parties hereto; has been opera- ting sewage treatment and disposal facilities jointly under the terms and provisions of a certain agreement dated October 8, 1958, entitled "Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement"; and, WHEREAS, each of said Districts owns an undivided and. different interest in the various units and facilities constituting the joint treatment and disposal facilities of the County Sanitation Districts, which are hereinafter called "Joint Treatment and Di"sposal Facilitiesn and which are defined and described as all the jointly owned trunk sewers, real property, improvements to real property, treatment plant facilities, personal property and all sewerage facilities lying in, on or upon any of the territory generally bounded by Ellis Avenue on the north, the channel of the Santa Ana River on the east, the Pacific Ocean on the south and Bushard Street extended southerly to the Pacific Ocean on the west, and including in addition thereto the disposal facilities extending into the adjacent Pacific Ocean; and, WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to enter into this super- seding agreement for the purpose of updating the provisions of said ·agreement of October 8, 1958 in conformity with existing conditions and practices. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN EACH OF THE DISTRICTS, PARTIES HERETO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Califorrtia, is hereby made and appointed agent for each of the Districts, parties hereto, for the purpose of contracting for new construction, operating and maintaining the joint treatment and disposal facilities and operating and maintaining the joint admini- strative organization, and the granting of easements, licenses and permits over, on, under or upon the territory and property of the joint treatment and disposal facilities; provided, however, that any agreement or contract to expend or any ex~enditure of money in excess of the sum of .$2,000.00 (Resolution No. 884 dated Sept. 14, 1960), shall be done at the direction of or with the approval of each of the Districts, parties hereto (i.e., by motion or resolution authorizing, approving or ratifying). That County Sanitation District No. 1 shall perform such other duties as agent as may be directed by the Districts, parties hereto . - -- Section 2. That all the County Sanitation· Districts, parties hereto, shall have a joint administrative organization and office and shall have the same General Manager, Secretary and General Counsel; that said officers shall be appointed and serve at the pleasure of all the Districts, parties hereto, acting in conjunction with each other; that such persons shall be appointed and serve for such time and for the compensation fixed by the Boards of Directors of the seven County Sanitation Districts, parties hereto; that other necessary or proper agents, servants, employees, attorneys, accountants, laborers; or others may be employed.when authorized by the Board of Directors of said seven County Sanitation Districts, which shall fix their compensation and terms of employment. Section 3. That each County Sanitation District party hereto, shall from time to time transfer so much of its funds into the Sani- tation District joint operating fund as may be necessary; that the Sanitation District joint operating fund shall be used to pay all administrative· expenses incurred in the existence of the County Sanitation Districts, parties to this agreement, together with all costs of operations arising from the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial .wastes, not including new or additional construction as distinguished from maintenance costs of jointly owned facilities. That each District shall be charged and shall pay the charges in direct proportion to the annual gallonage flows from each District into the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities. That said charges shall be computed periodically, not more frequently than monthly nor less frequently than annually. That said annual gallonage flow from each District shall be determined by the General Manager as-the sum of monthly determinations. Said monthly determinations shall be made by install- ing, when practicable, appropriate metering devices in trunk sewers entering the joint treatment and disposal facilities and in trunk sewers serving more than one District. That when s'aid metering devices are not practicable or, when installed, are, in the judgment of the General Manager, not functioning reliably, said monthly deter- minations shall be made by the best methods available, including, but not limited to, field measurements of flow in said trunlc sewers and branch sewers and/or by estimating the current population and the per capita discharge of domestic sewage and the total flow of industrial waste in the ·District or area in question, as shown by experience data when available. That the terms "maintenance" and "operation" as used herein shall mean the repairs and upkeep made necessary by ordinary use and operation of the facilities,' including all tools and operating equipment, materials and supplies, the wages and salaries of emplpyees engaged in or connected with the operation of the facilities, inclu- ding all tools and operating equipment, materials and supplies, the wages and salaries of employees engaged in or connected with the operation of the joint treatment and disposal facilities, and the costs and expenses, including salaries, of the joint administrative· organization, but not including any construction costs. Section 4. That annually, not later than June 30 of each calendar year commencing with the year 1971, there shall be an - - - adjustment of ownership interests in the whole. of the joint treatment and disposal facilities between each of the Districts, parties hereto, which shall prevail for the next ensuing fiscal year. That said ownership interests shall be adjusted SO· that all sewage and indus- trial waste originating within the Districts, parties hereto, may be treated and disposed of by the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities. That the necessary percentage of each of the District's, parties hereto, ownership shall be calculated according to the math- ematical average of said flows and assessed valuations for the three years immediately preceding the first day of July in each year, and that as each year elapses, that year's figure shall be added and the figures for the year oldest in time shall be dropped from the calcu- lations. That after determining the necessary annual m·mership percentage of each of the Districts, parties hereto, said percentage ·shall .be applied against the total capital investment in the· joint treatment and disposal facilities as determined on June 30 of the calendar year, to establish the ownership equity required by each ·.respective District. That payment or credits between the respective Districts necessary to adjust to the so established ownership equity required by each District shall be determined annually on June 30 of the calendar year. That each District shall pay or receive over a period of not to exceed five years from date of such establishment of ownership equity, any payment or credit so determined and that any said payments remaining unpaid shall bear interest at the rate of three percent per ar1num. That the m·mership percentage of each Dis- trict on the effective date of this agreement is hereby established as set forth in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof • .,. . Sec.tion 5. That in order to provide adequate sewerage facilities to adequately treat and dispose of sewage and industrial wastes arising within the Districts, parties hereto, it is contemplated that new construction within the territory in which the treatment and disposal facilities are located will be required from time to t±me. That when such new construction is required and approved by each of the Dis- tricts, parties hereto, each District shall contribute its proportionate share of the costs thereof in accordance with the ownership interest of each District as of the date of the payments to be made on any such contract or contracts for construction. That the term "c-onstruction" shall mean the con- struction of any new facilities within the territory comprising the joint treatment and disposal facilities and shall include recon- struction which shall include the replacement or rebuilding of any of the facilities of the joint treatment and disposal facilities whether said replacement or rebuidling is made necessary by wear, obsolescence, accident or damage or destruction by flood, storm, earthquakes or other public calamity or act of God. Section 5a. That in order to provide for an equitable and fair distribution of contributions, received from any source, in aid of construction or for purchases of capacity in jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities received by County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County as agent for each of the Districts, District. No. 1 shall promptly transfer to County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, their proportionate share of such contributions or purchases in accordance with the ownership interests of each District as of the date payments are received for such contrlbutions or purchases. - Section 6. That each District, party h9reto, shall have · the perpetual right to use all the joint treatment and disposal facilities which are required to adequately treat and dispose or· all sewage and industrial wastes arising-.within the territory of said District. That none of the Districts, parties hereto, shall in any way grant, encumber, limit or restrict its interest or owner- ship in any part of the said joint treatment and disposal facilities or seek to partition the same or have any part thereof set apart in severalty or use said part for any purpose other than the disposal of sewage and industrial wastes without the prior written consent of the other Districts, parties hereto. Section 7. That an:y fertilizer or other substance arising out of the operation of the joint treatment and disposal facilities shall be the properties of the County Sanitation Districts, parties hereto, and may be sold for the best obtainable price, such sale to be made by the General Manager, and the proceeds thereof shall be ·.divided and apportioned among the parties hereto· in the same proportion as tne payments of maintenance and operation costs which are charged against each District. That said money is to be apportioned among and paid to said County Sanitation Districts on or before the fifteenth day of the month following the month in which said payments are received. That no District shall permit or knowingly.countenance the use of the joint treatment and disposal facilities or any part thereof for the disposal of sewage, effluent or industrial wastes originating ... ---.,outside of its territorial limits; except upon con.di tions agreed upon ·and consented to by each of the County Sanitation Districts, parties hereto. That all revenues originating fr.om the disposal of such sewage, effluent or industrial wastes originating outside of the territorial limits of any County Sanitation District, party hereto, shall be apportioned among the several Districts, according to agree- ment reached when such Districts consent to receive such sewage effluent or industrial wastes. That the joint administrative organization shall cause to be. kept accurate and correct books of account, showing in detail the costs and expenses of any new construction, extra con- struction or reconstruction and the maintenance and operation of the joint treatment and disposal facilities and all parts thereof, and all financial transactions of the County Sanitation Districts, which books of account shall correctly show any receipts and also any costs, expenses or charges to be paid by all or any of the parties hereto, and also records. of the sewage flow from any of said Districts, together with the strength of effluent delivered from each District. That said books of account shall be open to inspection at all times by .. any members of the Board of Direct.ors of any County Sanitation District, party hereto, or by any accountant or other person autho- rized _by such.Board of Directors to inspec~ said books of account. That should any dispute or controversy arise in connection with the said books of account, or in connection with the cost of construction, maintenance, operations, repairs, reconstruction, extra construction or any new construction of the joint treatment and disposal facilities or in connection with any of the affairs or operations thereof or any part of this agreement, the Board of Directors of each County Sanitation District, party hereto, shall appoint or designate one member thereof as arbitrator and said - - arbitrators so chosen shall act as a Board of Arbitration in connection with any such dispute or controversy, and the findings approved by the vote of a majority of said Board of Arbitration shall be binding and conclusive upon all the parties hereto. Provided, however, that, should the said arbitrators be unable to obtain a majority vote on any issue presented to it, then said arbitrators voting in favor of making a finding on such issue shall designate a disinterested person to act as an arbitrator, and the arbitrators voting against making such a finding shall designate a disinterested person to act as an arbitrator, and the persons so designated shall designate a disinter- ested person to act as the third arbitrator and the three persons so selected shall constltute a Board of Arbitration to act in place of and have the powers of the Board of Arbitration composed of members of the respective Boards of Directors, and the findings approved by a vote of majority of the Board of three arbitrators shall be binding and conclusive upon all parties hereto. Section 8. That·this agreement shall continue in effect so long as it shall be to the interest and advantage of the Districts, parties hereto, to maintain such Joint Administrative Organization and to operate a joint treatment and disposal facility. That if at any time it should cease to be to the interest and advantage of any. District, party hereto, to continue as a party to .this agreemept and its Board of Directors shall so find and declare by resolution adopted by a two-thirds majority of the total number of Directors of such District, it may withdraw herefrom and terminate its obligations hereunder after one year's notice in writing to the other parties hereto of its intention to do so. That such withdrawal of a District . shall become effective only at the end of the fiscal year next after the aforesaid one year's notice of intention ·to withdraw and shall n·ot become effective unless such withdrawing District shall have fully and completely discharged all of its debts and obligations to any other District, party hereto, or the joint administrative organization, for which it shall become or has become liable up to the date of its withdrawal; provided, however, that should any District withdraw here- .from, this agreement shall continue in effect thereafter as to the remaining parties thereto in like manner as if said District so with- drawing had never been a party to said agreement; prqvided further, that any District so withdrawing from the joint administrative organization shall not be entitled to be reimbursed for any contri- butions previously made by it directly or indirectly to the State Employees Retirement System of the State of California pursuant to the provisions of this agreement. Section 9. That this agreement shall be effective as of July 1, 1970, and shall supersede and take the place of that certain Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated October 8~ 1958, as amended. I • I - ! ! J I I ) ~ J . I LJ I I 1 I .. ~ u 0 u u u J i f - VII. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REVENUE PROGRAM FORMS I .., I l I . I l FORM 1 SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS A 8 tii.::":lber of USERS USER GROUPS Parcels 289 Industrial 504.224 Residential and Small Nonresidential 123 Tax Exempt 3 Federal Installations 504,639 SUBTOTAL. ~ Special Classifications >< Infiltration! Inflow ~ Future Capacity Federal Facilities 154 Local Government** 504,793 TOTALS *Thousands of pounds **City, County and Schools c S.l.C Group Number >< I>< >< >< I>< I l l I "'l I ( 1 •• I l I rJIUNICI PALITY CSDOC -All Districts DATE 1979-1980 Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capacitv T~tal Annual Car acitv D E F G H I J K Flo~ BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOO SS MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day ilG lbs lbs 25.2 538 404 112, 807 84,803 9,177 41.175 30,952 164.4 207 333 284,095 457,020 60,468 103,630 166,706 0.6 377 310 1,782 1,470 207 650 536 0.3 213 181 518 468 104 185 157 . 190.5 399,202 543,761 69,956 145,640 198,351 1.0 >< >< >< >< 365 >< >< >< .><. >< 5.1 250 250 10,332 10,332 1,809 3, 771 3, 771 196.6 409,534 554,093 149 ,411 202,122 I I I ( l [_ I I I ( l I I I I · l · · I I I ( FORM 1 rJIUNICI PALITY CSDOC -District No. 1 su~~MARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS DATE 1979-1980 A B c Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capaci tv Total Annual Car. acitv Ni.::cber of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C D E F G H I J. K Parcels Group Flow BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOD SS Number MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day iW lbs !bs 54 Industrial 3.0 503 633 i2.394 15.609 1 079 4,524 5~697 33,574 Residential and Small Nonresidential 21.06 207 333 36,358 58,488 7' 719 13, 271 21,348 18 Tax Exempt (2600 employees 0.04 250 250 77 77 14 28 28 - 33,646 SUBTOTAL 24.1 48,829 74,174 8,812 17,823 27,073 >< Special Classifications >< _>< Infiltration/ Inflow r>< >< >< >< >< >< >< _>< Future Capacity r>< _>< ">< >< Federal Facilities I>< I 20 Local isoo emB 0c Governmen~'x37.0 ~ ts 0.4 250 250 817 817 14~ ?OQ 298 33,666 TOTALS 24.5 49,646 74,991 8,955 18,121 27,371 *Thousands of pounds . H:r.1 tv, r.onPtv and Scho0l s I I I ( I ( ( I .( I. l I I ~r . ·t . I I I FORM 1 MUNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 2 SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS DATE 1979-1980 A B c Wastewater Ch.aracteristics Desiqn Caoacitv Total Annual Cai:: a<::itv Ni:mber of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C 0 E F G H I J K Parcels Group Flow BOO SS BOO SS Volume BOO SS Number MGO mg I mg I lbs day lbs day i/.G lbs !bs 121 Industrial 11. 2 530 494 '49,322 45,938 4,073 18,003 16,767 120,813 Residential and Small ·Nonresidential 44.3 207 333 76,479 123,031 16,214 27,915 44,906 46 Tax Exempt (6.,700 ernploye es 0.3 155 138 340 304 96 124 111 + Cal State F lllert :m) 120,980 SUBTOTAL. 55.8 126,141 169", 273 20,383 46,042 61,784 _>< Special Classifications >< >< Infiltration! Inflow r>< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< Future Capacity >< >< =::><_ >< Federal Facilities >< 57 Local !:> lUU ~ ~~ >es Government**172.orn ) c mts 1.8 250 250 3,690 3.690 646 1.347 1.347 121,037 TOTALS 57.6 129,831 172,963 21,029 47,389 63,131 *Thousands of pounds * -:: ("' ! ~ '' r• ., I ' n f•" '1 '1 ,,·l ~ (' h n n 1 "' I I ( I l I I FOR~ 1 SW/.MARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS A 8 c ~i:.:-ite: of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C Parcels Group Number 48 Industrial 157,7.19 Residential and Small Nonresidential 35 Tax Exempt (4,900 employee ;) Federal Installations 1 Calif. Army National Guard 1 Naval Weapons Station/ Seal Beach 157,802 SUBTOTAL .>< Special Classifications _>< Infiltration! Inflow >< Future Capacity Federal Facilities 40 Local 4500 0n Government** 133,0 1( 157,842 TOTALS *Thousands of pounds **Cttv, County and Schools 1>< I>< l>< :>< ~~ l I I I I l l I l I I l ' rJ1UNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 3 DATE 1979-1980 Wastewater Characteristics Desi qn Capaci tv Total Annual Car acitv D E F G H I J K Flow BOD SS BOO SS Volume BOD . SS MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs da1 ;;",G lbs 1~s 7.8 642 302 41 5S9 10 C:AQ · 2,832 15.169 7.13S ' 53.6 207 333 92,534 148,859 19,580 33 .so3 I 54.378 0.07 250 250 143 143 25 52 c;? 0.05 200 120 96 91 19 :n lQ 0.03 160 107 35 24 10 13 9 61.5 134.367 168.665 22.466 49 OfiR 61 59\ >< ~ ~ >< ~ >< >< >-< ~ I s nts 1.4 250 250 2.869 ? RfiQ r:;n? 1 0.17 1 ()d7 - 62.9 137,236 171,534 22,968 so, 115 62,640 I I I I I l I I FORM 1 SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS A Number of Parcels 1 14,935 . 2 14,938 >< ><" >< 5 14,943 B USERS USER GROUPS Industrial Residential and Small Nonresidential Tax Exempt (200 employees) SUBTOTAL. Special Classifications Infiltration/ Inflow Future Capacity Federal Facilities Local Government**g?8o~m~t8t TOTALS *Thousands of pounds · **C~ty, County and Schools c S.l.C Group Number >< C>< C>< >< ~~ I l I ( .. I I I l I I I I rJIUNICI PALITY. CSDOC -District No. 5 DATE 1979-1980 Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capaci tv Total Annual Car acitv D ~ F G H I J K Flow BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOO SS MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day i{,G lbs lbs 0.10 157 l57 132 132 37 48 48 9.4 207 333 16,228 26,106 3,432 5.925 9.531 o. oo:~ 250 250 6 6 1 2 2 9.6 16,366 26.224 3.470 5.975 9.581 1.0 >< >< >< >< 365 >< >< >< ~ ~ 0.05 250 250 112 11? 20 4] 41 10.6 16,478 26,356 3,855 6,016 9,622 I ( I I ( I I FOR~. 1 SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS I ' A B c :;:.:~,se~ o~ USERS USER GROUPS · S.l.C Parcels Group . Number 6 Industrial 21,426 Residential and Small Nonresidential 7 Tax Exempt (800 employees & Fairview State Hospital) I 21,439 SUBTOTAL. >< Special Classifications ~ >< Infiltration! Inflow >< >< Future Capacity D< 13 21,452 Federal Facilities >< Local Government**a£?o8~P~~~~~ TOTALS I *Thousands of pounds **City, County and Schools I I I I I I l I I I I ( tJ1UNICIPALITY ~SDOC -District No. 6 DATE 1979-1980 Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capacity Total Annual Car. acitv D E F G H I J K Flow 800 SS BOO SS Volume 800 SS MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day fi·,G !b~ lbs 0.8 117 90 828 639 310 302 n:-; I I l 1.'(' ' 17.0 207 333 20,717 33,327 4,350 7,SlQ 12,081 I 0.1 1.010 753 1.153 860 50 421 314 . 12.9 22,698 34,826 4 '710 8,233 12,628 >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< i 0.4 250 250 870 870 152 318 318 13.3 23,568 35,696 4,862 8,551 12,946 I I .. I I l I I I .FORM l SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS A B -------'. c N!.!!':lbN of USERS USER GROUPS Parcels 44 Industrial 62,158 Residential and Small Nonresidential 8 Tax Exempt (900 employees 8 Univ. CA/Irvine) Federal Installations 1 Marine Coros Air Station 62. 211 SUBTOTAL >< Special Classifications >< Infiltration! Inflow >< Future Capacity Federal Facilities 13 Local 9go 0~plo, Government**3 .0 stt 62,224 TOTALS *Thousands of pounds **City, County and Schools S.l.C Group Number >< I>< C>< >< :~ l I I .·.I I I I ( I I rAUNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 7 DATE 1979-1980 Wastewater Characteristics Desian Caoacitv Total Annual Car. acitv D E. F G H I J K Flow BOD SS BOO SS Volume BOD SS MGO mg I mg I lbs day lbs day il.G lbs 1:s 1.9 517 168 8.312 2.699 703 3 0'\4 QRt; 9.8 207 333 16,919 27,217 3,565 6,lSSi 9.901 o. o: 250 250 38 38 7 14 14 0.2 227 207 387 353 75 141 129 11.9 25,656 30,307 4,350 9,344 11, 029 >< ~ ~ ~ >< >< _><. ><.. >< 0.4 250 250 .743 743 130 271 271 12.3 26,399 31,050 4,480 9,615 11, 300 I I -I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I FO R~I 1 rJ1UNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 11 SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS DATE 1979-1980 A 8 c Wastewater Characteristics Design Caoacitv Total Annual Car acitv D E F G H I J K ~•~-::r of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C Parcels I Group Flow BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOD SS Number MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day ii.G !!ls I Its 15 Industrial 0.4 79 73 2fif ?7.:R 14~ 95 87 - 93,601 Residential and Small Nonresidential 14.4 207 333 24.860 39.992 5.243 9.051 I 14.t;fil l 7 Tax Exem~t (800 emolovees 0.04 77 128 25 42 14 q 1 ~ + State Beach) I 93,623 SUBTOTAL 14.8 25,145 40.272 5.400 9 .155 14.663 >< Special Classifications >< >< Infiltration! Inf/aw ~ >< >< >< >< >< >< >< Future Capacity C>< >< ><I">< Federal F~cilitics >< I 6 · . ouu empl( Local Governmentx*S9.000 s ye:~ .u.a-nt_: 0.6 250 250 1.231 1. 231 216 449 449 93,629 TOTALS I 15.4 2·6, 376 41.,503 5,616 9,604 15' 112 I *Thousands of p ounds **City, County and Schools I I I I I l I l l l I ... I I I l I I I FORM 2.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST DATA(!) SUMMARY MUNICIPALITY CSDOC DATE 3/13/79 (Figures in $000's) l ·. TREATMENT FACILITIES CURRENT YEAR 1978-79 FIRST YEAR REVENUE PROGRAM 1979-80 LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & Eg MAT'LS TOTAL. LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & EQ MAT' LS . TOTAL Bl. Influent/Effluent . $195.7 $164.3 $ 15.7 $407. 0. .$782. 7 $246.1 $206.7 $ 19.7 $511. 9 $984.4 B2. Primary Equipment 59.5 54.8 4.7 37.5 156.5 74.8 68.9 6.0 47.2 196.9 B3. Primary Structur~s 25.8 30.5 1..6 20.3 78.2 32.5 38.4 2.0 25.6 98.5 B4. Secondary Equipment 61. 0 64.2 1. 6 29.7 156.S 76.8 80.7 2.0 37.4 196.9 BS. Secondary Structures 7.0 7.0 ·o.8 24.3 39.1 8.9 8.9 1.0 30.S 49.3 B6. Digestion-Solids 200.4 275.S 25.0 751.3 1252.2 252.0 346.5 31.3 945.1 1575.1 B7. Operative-Utilities 606.5 450.0 900.3 1956.7 763.0 566.1 1132. 2 2461.3 BB. General & Admini- strative 1429.9 1021. 4 34.0 919.1 3404.4 1798.6 1284.7 42.8 1156. 3 4282.4 Sub-Total $2585.8 $2067.7 $ ·33. 4 $3089.5 $7826.4 $3252.7 $2601.0 $104·. 8 $3886.2 $9844.8 REPLACEMENT 326.6 410. 2 DEPRECIATION o.o 0.0 TOTAL TREATMENT FACILITIES $8153.0 $10,255.0 2. COLLECTION FACILITIES Total Districts' Budgets 448.6 574.1 68.9 750.6 1842.2 460.7 587.6 70.7 753.0 1872.0 REPLACEMENT 76.8 78.0 DEPRECIATION 0.0 0.0 TOTAL COLLECTION FACILITIES $1919.0 $19SQ.O 3. TOTAL SYSTEM $10,07.2.0 $12,205.0 I I I I ( I FORM 2.1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST DATA (l) 1. TREATMENT FACILITIES Bl. Influent/Effluent B2. Primary Equipment B3. Primary.Structures B4. Secondary Equipment BS. Secondary Structures B6. Digestion-Solids B7. Operations-Utilities BS. General & Administrative REPLACEME:-ff TOTAL TREATMENT FACILITIES I l ( I I COST ALLOCATION TO LOADING PARAMETER (Figures in $OOO's) I FIRST YEAR REVENUE PROGRi\M 1979-80 $984.4 196.9 98.5 196.9 49.3 1575.1 2461.3 4282.4 410.2 $10,255.0 ' 2. COLLECTION FACILITIES (Includes Replacement) District 1 2 3 s 6 7 11 TOTAL COLLECTION FACILITIES 3. TOTAL SYSTEM $ 90.9 33·3. 0 438.0 306.9 85.0 434.2 212.0 $1950.0 $12,205.0 I I I I I I I MUNICIPALITY CSDOC DATE 3/13/79 ----- FLOW . BOD SS $984.5 -0- 34. S -0- 12. 3 -0- 836. 8 1456.0 138.5 $3462.6 $ 90.9 383.0 438.0 306.9 85.0 434.2 212.0 $1950.0 $5412.6 $-0- 68. 9 19.7 118.1 24.6 630.1 812:2 1284.7 123.3 $-0- 127. 9 44.3 78.8 12.3 945.1 812.2 1541.7 148.4 $3081.6 $3710.8 $3081.6 $3710.8 I l I I I I I ( I I I ··1 I I I l l I l FORM 2.2 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST DATA DISTRICTS' BUDGET DETAIL MUNICIPALITY CS DOC DATE 3/13/79 (Figures in $OOO's) DISTRICT CURRENT YEAR 1978-79 FIRST YEAR REVENUE PROGRAM 1979-80 LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & EQ MAT' LS REP LAC TOTAL LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & EQ MAT' LS REP LAC TOTAL -- 1 $ 27.1 $ 23.9 $ 1.6 $ 27.1 •$ 3.3 $ 83.0 $ 29.7 $ 26.2 $ 1. 7 $ 29.7 $ 3.6 $ 90.9 2 95.4 122.7 10. 2 112.4. 14.2 354.9 103.0 132.4 11.0 121.3 15.3 383.0 3 82.4 105.3 9.2 261 •. 0 19.1 477.0 75.7 96.7 8.4 239.7 17.5 438.0 5 61.6 69.6 10.7 125.9 11.1 278.9 67.8 76.6 11. 8 138.5 12.2 306.9 6 17.2 21. 7 2.2 33.7 3.1 78.1 18.8 23.7 2.4 36.7 3.4 85.0 7 126.4 175.4 28.5 77 .5 . 17. 0 424.9 129.2 179.2 29.2 79.2 17.4 434.2 11 38.4 55.4 6.4 113. 0 8.9 222.2 36.6 52.9 6.1 107.9 8.5 212.0 Sub-Total $448.6 $574.1 $ 68.9 $750.6 $ 76.8 $1919.0 $460.8 $587.7 $ 70.6 $753.0 $ 78.0 $1950.0 SEPRECIATION -0--0- TOTAL DISTRICTS BUDGET $1919.0 $1950.0 Jorm 4 nJ.JuSTRt~L cosf.l l\.iCO~ .t:..1u ALluL;ATIJN:; I l ( l I I I f\LN1CrPJLn Y !~uuc l ·oA~E 3/l!/79 (Pl-16 Only) Grant Eligible Flow BOD SS Component Total Cost Co.st % _$_ % _$_ % _$_ Activated Sludge Equipment $ 8,107,700 $ 7,730,810 0 $ 0 60 $ 4,638,490 40 $ 3,092,320 Structures 9,302,120 8,569,440 25 2,142,360 50 4 '284' 720 25 2,142,360 Secondary Claifiers Equipment 2,503,000 2,361,990 0 0 60 1,417,190 40· 944,800 Structures 3,602,460 3,561,130 25 890 ,280 50 1,780,570 25 890,280 Sludge Thickeners Equipment 766,560 756,560 0 0 60 453,940 40 302,620 Structures 590,930 584 ,150 0 0 60 350,490 40 233,660 Digesters and Digester Control Bldg Equipment 1,139,600 1,126,230 o. 0 40 450,490 60 675,740 Structures 2,787,690 2,755,710 0 0 40 1,102,280 60 1,653,430 Sludge Dewatering Equipment 5 76' 700 518,820 0 0 40 207,530 60 311,290 Structures 130,270 128,780 0 0 40 51,510 60 77, 270 Chlorination 4272130 356,630 100 356 2 630 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total 29,934,160 28,450,250 12 3,389,270 52 14, 737 ,210 36 10, 323, 770 Order Control 533,920 24 7' 790 12 29,?30 52 128, 850 36 89,200 Primary Power 684, 300. 672,550 12 80, 710 52 349,730 36 242,120 Landscaping 108, 250 107,000 12 12,840 52 55,640 36 38', 520 Yard Piping and Misc. ·802,530 649,220 12 77 ,910 52 337 '590 36 233,720 Total . $32,0G3,1GO $30,126,810 12 $3,590,460 $52 $15,609,020 36 $10,927,330 Federal Grant Portion $22,595,110 $2,692,840 $11, 706' 770 $ 8,195,500 Federal Grant Portion ~ 30 $ 753,170 $ 89,760 $ 390,230 $ 273,180 *Based on·Grant Elinible Cost .. - .. Form G MUNICIPALITY CS DOC UNIT COST DETERMINATION (1979-80) DATE _3Ll.3J.~79"---L Cos I C~1lcgory ~ SA C3 .C D E u Par:i1r.rtcr Annu:il Cost Total Quantities U11il Cosl S For Each~ Alloc.1hon Alloc:1tcd Parameter · Pcrccnt:i~~s to Eac.h P:uamclcr See Form IA !i 1. ICR From Form 4 From Form 4 _><:_ ~f I II ~ . ·1 $ 71. 765/MG (c)fi Flow 89.760 $ 1. 251/MG I~ BOD 390,230 149,41Ha) $ 2: 612 (b) ~ ! SS 273,180 202,122(a) $ 1. 352 (b) tl .'.J TOTAL $ 753,170 ~ !I 2. DEBT SERVICE From Form 5 fi ~1 -=:>-<::. ~·~ I II --)1 .. Flow ll ,4 BOD NLA ~ ,, $5 r1 1 : I 3, CAPITAL OUTLAY From Form 5 .:i 'i ~ ~;·i 'I Ill ... --ii ":·t , tt Flow N/A ~ BOD 1l ~ SS H : ~ ~ J -" ' f J 4 0 & fd See Inst. From Form 2.1 : " II I ~ ~!·~ (cJ!l Flow s 5.412.600 69,956/MG $77. 37149/MG 1~ r! BOD d 3,081,627 145,640 (a) $21, 159207 (b)!1 ' ti ; SS · 3,710,772 198,351 (a) $!8, 708108(bltl L ..... , ... ==,..,.....,1.~T~~~.,_~~=-. H II ~.~u;..;d (a) Thousands of .pounds (b) Per thousands of pounds. (c) In order to calc11lat~ the actual charge for any individual user, the flow rate shown here must be broken down to the rate for the District in which the user is located and the joint works rate. The combined flow rate shown here represents a weighted average of all seven Districts plus the joint · · '~o-rks irate.. · I I I I I I I I ~ l I I l I I I I I I FORM 7 MUN I Cf PALITY . __ C_S_DO_C,;;._---:----------- . su:~~:l,ARY OF FU~D COSTS FUND mf & R DATE 3/13/79 I SS [ I E I F I G U~IT COST s (1) UNIT COST SOD SS 9': $21.159207~1 41,175 rs. 708108/ 1000 1 1000 lb $ 2,160.32 - " 60,468 I '>n"7 I 104 I I I " 1 103~ II " I 650 I " -·i . I It l 185 I " I 166,706 I 1231 Tax Exempt · 1 11 I 207 • 11 • "on • " 1 o<" Fl •· I •• 1 Federal Installations " 157 9,989.98 f 39.80 ·r ' 14.90 I ~ I I LJ ~ 145,640 J I ' I l-iSVSTOTALS 1 69,956 198,351 $12,205.0 j I Special Classifications N/A -, l Infiltration 1 lnflo'll (2) I I Futvre Capocity J l Federal Facilities N/A I N/_A. I I . . I I I I I . 1 I I SUBTOTALS . I . ·. J .. . . I " 1$12,205.0 I I ! . TO I ALS --·. _____L_, __LI ---'---- r,~ ...... .._ .. -............... (1) Thousands of pounds (2) Included in Flow Unit Cost. l I l I l I I ·I ( I I : . I l I I l 1 I l FORr~ 7 MUNICIPALITY CS DOC SWlM . .;RY OF FUND COSTS ' FUND __ r_c_R _____ DATE 3/13/79 ·;. -~, .• o· I FLOW BOD (1) SS (2) TOTAL B c r; E F G II ! I "'r::r~·-I I USER/GROUP UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST '.) .,,,,_, > Q s BOD s SS s ' • 289. Industrial $1. 251/MG 9,177/MG $2.6121 1 £R~ 41,175 $ J.OOC 1,3521/lbs. 30,952 $160,877 H - I l I I I i I i I ' I I , I \ SUBTOTALS 9~177 /MG 41,175 30,952 $160,877 Special Classifications Ir.filtration! Inflow Future Capacity I Federal Facilities SUBTOTALS ---I TOTALS $160,877 - (1) Thousands of Pounds (2) Included in Flow Unit Cost .. ( I I i I l I ( ( t ( I B I FORM 8 t-.r: ~·iU AL REV EN U E MUNICIPALITY ___ c_s_o_o_c _______ _ CATE __ 3~/_1_3~/7_9 ____ _ FIRST FULL YEAR OF OPERATION 1979-80 D E G K F II --A -I B C O&M Cost ;.,,e:JC'e ~1·.;-:~: 'j: I USER GROUPS First Fell Capital O_perating (l Ad~inist~at:on Total ArmuJI ?e·.e:-~;.e I, :..;:;::•s Yr.ar Debt Ser'lice Outlays Reserves · ICR Costs (1: R!!vr!~::e ~:::-:~: t_,_ ___________________________ --"'~~.:;,r.tl_ln,~in--;r-~-----r--------r---------t---------{--------.~------~~-..:r~~e~e:~~~~--+-------~ I 289 I Industrial $·2,160,324 N/A N/A $160,877 I J ~ 2;321,19~ $ 8031.8 I l I bo4,224 J Residential/Small Non-Res. 9,989,98~ " r t i i I 123 i Tax Exemut " " " 39 '79~ " NIA 9,989,98~ 19.·8 39,79i 323.6 i l 3 I 1 Federal Installation 14.89J " " " 14' 89~ 4966.3 I I r·~-:,·-~---~~~--~--'r~----+-~---t--------+------l------t-----~~--~------~----~ I i ,. l ~-~'1 --~------~~-------."-----}--~·~---+----ll. ____ ~----~--_.__--~ I I SP~:!,."\L CLASSIFICATIONS 1-,-·----l---+----+--+---~~!~......,....-. ------,,,..)----+---+----!---. ~ t I 111/UtraUon/inffow (1) I~~ Future Capacity N/A Federal Fecilities N/A >< [, _____ .. 'l_~s_u=-o __ -=' O=T=, A=TL=o-~=A=L=========~~$""",·-2-, 2-o-s-,-0-0 1 )-----J!,--_-J-'.-._-_-_-_-_-_-::1_$~1~6-o_-,_8~7-._7~"'J,,_·-_-_-_-_-_-_-:.?,.,.1-~.~~~~~~'.-i:,.r-·1-1_:~"~:-6_6-:_'-,_:~:-4,"""'·, ~~~~~~~-.i (1) Included in 0 & M Costs [ FORM 9 I I ( I I I I I ( MUNICIPALITY CS DOC RATE DETERMINATION AND REVENUE PROGRAM SUMMARY USER GROUP 1979-80 REVENUES REVENUE TYPE RESIDENTIAL/ Residential Small Nonresidential SMALL NONRESIDENTIAL User Charges Collected Through 1% Ad Valorem Taxes INDUSTRIAL/ COMMERCIAL TAX EXEMPT/ GOVERNMENTAL INDUSTRIAL/ COMMERCIAL (ICR) ALL USERS Excess 1% AV Taxes Collected From Residential/SNR Users Total 1% AV Taxes Collected From Residential/SNR Users Districts' Share of 1% AV Taxes Paid by Industrial Commercial Users Net Directly Billed User Charge (After Credit for AV Taxes) Total Ind/Comm OM&R Revenues Directly Billed User Charges Total Tax Exempt/Gov't Revenues Total FY 1980 OM&R Revenue Col- lections !CR Charges (Directly Billed) Total OM&R and !CR Revenues REVENUE AMOUNT $9,989,982 569,018 $10,559,000 $ 327,000 1,833,322 $ 2,160,322 54,696 $ 54,696 $12,774,018 $ 160,877 $12,934,895 L. I l I I I I ~ · 1 DATE 3/19/79 FIRST FULL YEAR OF OPERATION 1979-80 REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT TYPE OM&R Requirements Attributable To Residential/Small Non- Residential Users Excess to be Carried Over to Res/SNR User Class in FY 1981 Total Res/SNR Requirement"s OM&R Costs Attributable to Industrial/Commercial Users OM&R Requirements Attributable to Tax Exernpt/Gov't Users Total OM&R Requirements (Incl Carryover to FY 1981) ICR Requirements REQUIREMENT AMOUNT $9,989,982 569,018 $10,559,000 $ 2,160,322 54,696 $12,774,018 $ 160,877 Total OM&R and ICR Requirements $12,934,895