HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-04-11COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
April 4, 1979
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS· Nas·.:·1~·· ·2., 3~ .. ·s>·s>·r &·11
. . . .
WEDNESDAY.,· APRIL-11;· 1979 .. ~ 7·:·30 ·p·,M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY., CA~IFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, will be held at the above hour and date.
Scheduled upcoming meetings:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, April 24th and Tuesday, May 8th,
at 11:00 a.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 25th, at 5:30 p.m.
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX0127
10644 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962·2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITrEE MEETING DATES
Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979
May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979
June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979
July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979
Aug 8, 1979 None Scheduled
Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979
Oct 10, 1979 Oct 25, 1979
Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979
Dec 12, 1979 None Scheduled
Jan 9, 1980 Jan. 23, 1980
Feb 13, 1980 Feb 21, 1980
Mar 12, 1980 Mar 26, 1980
Apr 9, 1980 Apr 23, 1980
~~·-BOARDS OF DIRECTons
~~ w 'iounty Stsnitcltion Districts
of OrtJnge County, California
Post Offico Box 8127
·10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
1 JOINT BOARDS Area Coda 714
540-2910
962-2411
II AGENDA
MEETING DATE
APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION1 STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessa~y
(4) Recognition of special guests
'W (5) Consideration of motion to receive and. file minute excerpts, if any
See supplemental agenda ·
.(6) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed: 4
District 1 March 14, 1979, regular
District 2 -March 14, 1979, regular
District 3 -March 14, 1979; regular
District 5 -March 14, 1979, regular
District 6 March 14, 1979, regular
District 7 -March 14, 1979, regular
District 11 -March 14, 1979, regular
......,,.. (7) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
·differently for any District.)
ALL DISTRICTS
Fund "A'! and "C" Joint Operating -See page(s)
~--~~ ~~~~
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -See page(s) "A" and "C"
DISTRICT NO. 1 -NONE
. DISTRICT NO. 2 -See page (s)
DISTRICT NO. 3 _ See page (s)
DISTRICT NO. 5 .-See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 6 _ NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 -NONE
DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE
(9) ALL DISTRICTS.
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 (CC)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and·
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar. ·
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
-,_.. {W), (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J~4-2, authorizing an addition of
$686.45 to the contract with equinox-malibu for additional
work on handrail ·and painting on post-chlorination pipe, and
granting a time extension qf 55 calendar days for completion
of said work. See page "E"
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-39, accepting Chlorination
Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2,
as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion, and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F"
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
negotiate and issue purcha~e orders for replacement of proprietary
instruments at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 damaged by lightning storm for·a
maximum amount of $25,000 plus tax and freight
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
solicit proposals and issue purchase orders for portable buildings,
installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appurtenances
required for an operations and maintenance yard at the Sewage
Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon landfill site, for a
maximum amount not to exceed $20,000
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue
Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, authorizing an addition of $15,119.00
to the contract with Triad Mechanical, Inc. , for relocation of
power panel necessitated by a change in Southern California Edison
Company requirements and for miscellaneous modifications in steel
piping; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for
completion of said work. See page "G"
Consideration of notion authorizing and ratifying action of
General Manager re issuance of emergency purchase orders in
connection with repair of main sewage pump No. 7 located at
Headworks "C" for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks,
Specification No. A-096, to ·Trans-West Ford for the total amount
of $35,616.00; and rejecting alternate bid of Bob Johnson GMC as not
in compliance with the specifications. See page "H"
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recom-
mendation and awarding purchase in connection with Specification
No. A-097 of two (2) 6-cylinder, manual transmission pickups, for the
total amount of $10,205.68, and one (1) 8-cylinder, automatic trans-
mission pick, for the amount of $5,779.12, to Bob Johnson GMC; and
rejecting bids of Theordore Robbins Ford and.Fairview Ford as not in
compliance with the specifications for said 8-cylinder pickup truck.
See pages "H-2" and "I"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
t,;;-. ~·
• jL _,
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
negotiate and issue purchase order for replacement of complete
track and roller system on Districts' 1970 caterpillar front V
end loader for an amount not to exceed $15,000
(j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
John Owings, dated March 23, 1979, in the amount of $717.09 for
alleged damage to his cement mixer, and refer to the Districts'
liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Steven Allan Simmons, dated March 24,1979, in the amount of
$60.00 for alleged damage to his ·vehicle, and refer to the
Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Robert D. Fatland, dated March26, 1979, in the amount of $181.75
for alleged damage to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts~
liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to .
issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 36928 to Clifford
Forkert, increasing the total amount from $4500 to $5250 for
additional engineering services required in connection with
design of Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17
(n) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the
plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing
Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, changing the bid date
from March 27 to April 3, and changing a connection from· the
Districts' 6-inch water line to the City of Fountain Valley's
16-inch water main instead
(o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Advance
Fire Protection Co., Inc., dated March 31, 1979, declining to
do the work in connection with Job No. PW-070, Fire Sprinkler
System for Existing Warehouse at Palnt No. 1, and rejecting
their bid on the basis that the bid was received before
(p)
(q)
Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were issued for additional work. See
page ~'W"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-42, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for-Fire
Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job
No. PW-070, to R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. in the
total amount of $19,749.00. See pages "J" and "K"
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-40, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 79-20, reclassifying the position of Purchasing Super-
visor (Range 1057B, $1607/$2000)to the position of Buyer (Range 10538,
$1291/$1607). See page "L"
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-41, amending Positions and Salarie~
Resolution No. 79-20, providing for an approx. 4.125% salary adjustme~
to two Instrumentation Division classifications effective March 9, 1979,
pursuant to existing Memorandum of Understanding (At the March 14th mtg.
the Boards declared their intent to make said adjustments effective
March 9, 1979) Sec page "M"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
~. ..
~ (9) ,_ . ' (CONSENT CALE~DAR continued from page 4)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(r) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase (2.75%)
to Districts' Operations Engineer, Bill Fox, from Range 1061G,
Step 4.5 ($2508/mo.) to Step 5 ($2577/mo.) "in recognition of
achieving his State registration as Chemical Engineer effective 4/20/79
DISTRICTS 1 & 6
(s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-43, approving and authorizing
execution of temporary construction and permanent Easement Deeds
to the City of Costa Mesa in connection with construction of the
Hyland Avenue Storm Drain at no cost to the City. See page "N"
DISTRICTS 2 & 5
(t) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase and sale of
approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at
the current price of $28.00 per foot by District No. 2, for use
in construction of the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-l,
from District No. 5 (said pipe previously purchased by District
No. 5 under Contract No. 5-20A)
DISTRICT 2 .
(u) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans
(v)
and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l,
specifying that the pipe to be furnished by the District has been
manufactured in 18-foot lengths.
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-44-2, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-l, to John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc. in the amount of $189,970.00 .. See pages "0" and
"P"
(w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg)
Sub-Trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an addition
of $5,914.96 to the contract with Christeve Corporation for changes
in conditions not indicated on the plans, and granting a time
extension of 75 calendar days for completion of the additional
work. See page "Q"
(x) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg)
Subtrunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities for a total increase of $12,415.50 to
the contract with Christeve Corporation. See page "R"
(y) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-45-2, accepting Richfield
Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19
and 2-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page . "S"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
DISTRICT 3
(z) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $20,699.50 to the
contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for a change in paving
requirements, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for
completion of additional work. See page "T"
(aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the
plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $7,637.50 from
the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. See page "U"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(bb) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-46, approving plans and
specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. See page "V"
DISTRICT 5
(cc) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit
proposals for engineering services in connection with design
of the Ilig Canyon Drainage Area sewage system
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-6-
·, --= ..
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee:
(a) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, proposed
amendment to the Santa Ana Wa:tershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
agreement re deferred payment of supplemental treatment and
capital replacement. costs (see Executive Committee report)
(b) (1) Review of Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program by
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company
(2) Consideration of motion approving Draft Financial Plan and
Revenue Program, in principle, and declaring that said Financial
Plan and Revenue Program is in compliance with the intent of
applicable regulations, and authorizing submittal of Financial
Plan and Revenue Program to State Water Resources Control Board
for approval (copy enclosed with agenda material)
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplement~! agenda items, if any
(14) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(15) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(16) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
. (17) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(18) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-7-
(24) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of actions re Draft Environmental Impact Report for Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to file
Notice of Completion of Draft EIR re Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended
(b) Consideration of motion establishing as the
final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft
. Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer
(to be determined by the Board)
(c) Consideration of motion fixing at P .M.
at as the date, time and place for public
hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive
Trunk Sewer (date, time and place ·to be determined by the Board)
(d) Consideration of motion directing ~he staff to notice the
residents along Bayside Drive of the District's proposed project
advising them of the date, time and place of the public hearing
on th~ Draft.Environmental Impact Report for the Bayside Drive
Trunk Sewer
(27) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda item~, if any
(28) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
" -. BOARDS OF DJRECTOnS
II
County Snnitdtion Districts Post Office Box 8127
of O~ange County, California 10844 Ellis Ave nue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD, IN ADDITION) STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(4) Recognition of special guests
'-sTRICTS 2 & 3 ITEMS ON
-----'--SUPPL'EMENTAL AGENDA erpts, if any l (5)
[
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the
followin g citi es regarding election of m~yors and appointment of
alternates an? seating new memb e rs of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City District Active Alternate
Brea 2 Donald L. Fox Sal Gambina*
3 Melvin J. LeBaron . Sal Gambina*
Buena Park 3 Lester J . Reese Don R. Griffin*
La Habra 2 Earl C. Roget Beth Graham*
3 Beth Graham* Marion Corbett
Stanton 3 Martha V. Weishaupt* Joseph M. Wheeler
Yorba Linda 2 Henry W. Wedaa* Irwin M. Fried
District 6 March 14, 1979, regular
District 7 March 14, 1979, regular
District ll March 14, 1979, regular
lowing
I &.. (7) ALL DISTRICTS l!JC.'-, ,µ (;
Reports of: I \U v/l', / e.
(a) Jo i nt Chairman f,v:cc . ~·
(b) General ~l a n ager
(c) Genera l Counsel
meetings,
-.
(8) ALL DISTRICTS.
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
ROLLCALLVOTE the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
\.,I .District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District.) ·
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund -See page(s)
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -See page(s)
DISTRICT NO. 1 -NONE
. DISTRICT NO. 2 -See page(s)
DISTRICT NO. 3 -See page (s)
DISTRICT NO. 5 _ See page(s)
DISTRICT NO. 6 -NONE
DISTRICT.NO. 7 -NONE
DISTRICT NO. 11 -NONE
"A" and "C"
~~~~ ~~~~
"A" and "C"
"B" and "D"
"B" and "D"
"B"
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Rolt Call Vote -or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS-NOS, .. 9 (A) THROUGH -9-<cc)
All matters placed-upon the consent calendar·are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff .member, _or member
of the .public in attendance, there ·_will :be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be ·enacted by one action_approving all.motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot-for-resolutions included on the
consent calendar. -All items ..remov.ed ·from the. consent calendar.
shall-be considered ·-in the regular order .llf business.
Members of the-public· ·who-wish-~to.-remove an item-from_:_the·~=-
consent calendar ·shall, upon . .recognitioa-_by the ·chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * *"* * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar. ·
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment
at Treatment Plant No. -2, Job No. J~4-2, authorizing an addition of
$686.45 to the contract with equinox-malibu for additional
work on handrail and painting on post-chlorination pipe, and
granting a time extension of 55 calendar days for completion
of said work. See page "E"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-39, accepting Chlorination
Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2,
as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion, and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F"
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing· the General-Manager to
negotiate and issue purchase orders for-replacement of proprietary
instruments at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 damaged by lightning storm for· a
maximum amount of $25,000 plus tax and freight
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
solicit proposals and issue purchase orders for portable buildings,
installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appurtenances
required for·an operations.and maintenance yard at the Sewage
Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon landfill site, for a
maximum amount not ·to exceed $20,000
(e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue
Pump Station, Job No. I~IR, authorizing an addition of $15,119.00
to the contract with Triad Mechanical, Inc. , for relocation pf
power panel necessitated by a change in Southern California Edison
Company requirements ·and for miscellaneous modifications in steel
piping; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for
completion of said work. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of ootion authorizing and ratifying action of
General Manager re issuance of emergency purchase orders in
connection with···repair of main. sewage pump . .No . .7 located at
Headworks "C" for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000
(g) Consideration of motion to receive_and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding-purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks,
Specification No. A-096, to Trans-West Ford -for the·-·total amount
of $35;616.00; and rejecting .alternate __ bid of Bob Johnson GMC as not
in compliance with the specifications.· See-page "H"
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file· 'bid tabulation and recom-
mendation and awarding purchase in connection with-Specification
No. A-097 of two (2) 6-cylinder, manual transmission'-pickups~,--=for the
total a_mount--:<>f-$-10,-205.68, and.one (1) -8-cylinder, automatic-trans-
mission pick, for the amount.of $5,779.12, to Bob.Johnson -GMC; and
rejecting bids of Theordore Robbins Ford and Fairview Ford as not in
compliance with the specifications -for said 8-cylinder pickup truck.
See pages "H-2" and "I"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
-. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
negotiate and issue purchase order for replacement of complete
track and roller system on Districts' 1970 caterpillar front
end loader for an amount not to exceed $15,000
(j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
John Owings, dated March 23, 1979, in the· amount of $717.09 for
alleged damage to his cement mixer, and refer to the Districts'
liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Steven Allan SiDDllons, dated March 24,1979, in the amount of
$60.00 for alleged damage ·to his ·vehicle, and refer to the
Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(1) .Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Robert· D. Fatland, dated -March 26, 1979, in the amotmt of $181. 75
for alleged damage to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts'
liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to .
issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 36928 to Clifford
Forkert, increasing the total amotmt from $4500 to $5250 for
additional engineering services required in connection with
design of Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17
(n) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the
plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing
Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, changing the bid date
from March 27 to April 3, and changing-a connection .from·the.
Districts' 6-inch water line to the City of Fountain Valley's
16-inch water main instead
(o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Advance
Fire Protect±on Co., Inc., dated March 31, 1979. declining to
do the work in connection with Job.No. PW-070,.Fire Sprinkler
System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, and rejecting
their bid on the basis that the bid was received before
Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were issued for additional work. See
page "W"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-42, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Fire
Sprinkler System for·Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job
No. PW-070, to R & E Industrial _Fire Protection, Inc •... in the -
total amount of $19, 749 ~ 00. See pages "J" and "K" ---
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-40, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution .No. 79-20, reclassifying the position of Purchasing Super-
visor (Range 10578, $1607/$2000)to the position of Buyer (Range 1053B,
$1291/$1607). See page "L"
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-41, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 79-20, providing for an approx. 4.125% salary adjustment
to two Instrumentation Division classifications effective March 9, 1979,
pursuant to existing Memorandum of Understanding (At the March 14th mtg.
the Boards declared their intent to make said adjustments effective
March 9, 1979) See page "M"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
-..
(9) (CONSENI' CALENDAR conti~ued from page 4)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(r) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase (2.75%)
to Districts' Operations Engineer, Bill Fox, from Range 1061G,
Step 4.5 ($2508/mo.) to Step 5 ($2577/mo.) in recognition of
achieving his State registration as Chemical Engineer effective 4/20/79
DISTRICTS 1 & 6
(s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-43, approving and authorizing
·execution of temporary construction and permanent Easement Deeds
to the City of Costa Mesa in connection with construction of the
Hyland Avenue Storm Drain at no cost to the City. See page "N"
DISTRICTS 2 & 5
(t) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase and sale of
approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at
the current price of $28.00 per. foot by District No. 2, for use
in construction of the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-1,
from District No. 5 (said pipe previously purchased by District
No. 5 under Contract No. 5-20A)
DISTRICT 2
(u) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l,
specifying that the pipe to be furnished by the District has been
manufactured in 18-foot lengths.
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-44-2, to receive and file
bid tabulation and reconnnendation and awarding contract for
Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, to John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc. in the amount of $189,-970.00. See pages "0" and
"P"
(w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg)
Sub-Trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an addition
of $5,914.96 to.the contract with Christeve Corporation for changes
in conditions not indicated on the plans, and granting a time
extension-of 75 calendar days for completion of the additional
work. See page "Q"
(x) Consideration of motion approving :Change 7 0rder.No . .-2 to the .plans .
and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and -~chard (Kellogg)
Subtrunk, -Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, -authori·zing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities for a total increase of $12,415.50 to
the contract with Christeve Corporation. See page "R"
(y) Consideration -of Resolution No. 79-45-2, accepting Richfield
Sub~Trunk and Orchard ·(Kellogg) Sub-trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19
and 2-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "S"
(CONSENT CALENDAR-continued on page 6)
-5-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
DISTRICT 3
· (~) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $20,699.50 to the
contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for a change in paving
requirements, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for.
completion of additional work. See page "T"
(aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to.the
plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $7,637.50 from
the contract--wi th Kordi~k and Rados , J. V. See page "U"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(bb) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-46, approving plans and
specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. See page "V"
DISTRICT 5
(cc) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit
/
proposals for engineering services in connection with design
of the Big Canyon Drainage Area sewage system
/] .1 p v p ~JJ,, (1).-11'/ ~ ~" _..\) \F~.~.Qi.--r r·'-END OF CONSENT CALENDAR ~·~"
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items del~ted from consent calendar, if any
-6-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Cornrnittee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee:
(a) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, proposed
amendment to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
agreement re deferred payment of supplemental treatment and
capital replacement costs (see Executive Committee report)
(b) (1) Review of Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program by
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company
(2) Consideration of motion approving Draft Financial Plan and
Revenue Program, in principle, and declaring that said Financial
Plan and Revenue Program is in compliance with the intent of
applicable regulations, and authorizing submittal of Financial
Plan and Revenue Program to State Water Resources Control Board
for approval (copy enclosed with agenda material)
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(13)
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of General Coun se l at the
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agenci e s' Attorneys ' Se minar on
enforcement in St . Louis, Missouri, on April 4, 1979; an d authorizing
r e imbursement of expenses incurred in connec tion the rewith
(14) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(15) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn t 't
'(16) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn f; q 5
(18) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn (--~'f
(20) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn f 07
-7-
(2 2 ) DISTRICT 7 ..... Other l>u !;j ncss :ind communic;itions or r.upp l cmcnta l ag e nda it ems , if an y
ITTMS OH .(22 -a)
SUPPLEMENTAL AG ENDA
Considc r:ition of Stand:ird Hc solution t\o . 79-·18-7 , ordering annex a tion of
1.170 a c res of tcrritol')' to tlt e Di s trict in the vicinity of the intersection
of Plantcro a nd Vall e y Qu ail in Lem on ll ci p,ht s in th f' 11orth Tu s tin :irea,
proposed Annexation No . 84 -Chou Ann c.>..ation to County S:rnit:ition llistrict
No. 7
ITTM S ON (22-b) (1 )
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
Report of Genera l Counsel on propos ed agreeme nt with City of Orange
for col l ection of sch'cr connection charges
(2)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unani mous Ballot
Consider:ition of Resolution No. 79-49-7, approving agreement with
City of Or a nge for collection of s ewer connection charge s, and
rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7
Ordinance t\o. 705. See p:i ge "l" (Agreement in Dist. 7 Di rectors ' folders)
ITTMS ON (22-c)
SU PPLEMEN TAL AGENDA
Consideration of items relative to prope rty located at 1701 Sirrine
Drive, Santa Ana, Assessor 's Parcel No. 503-194-26, 1\'11ich is currenqy
(23)
outside the boundaries of District No. 7 and the 70th Sewer Maintenance
District:
(1 ) Conside ration of motion establishing a monthly sewer service fee
in the amount of $30 until said property is annexed to the District.
. (2) Consideration of motion estab li shing the annexation acreage fee
and District annex a tion processing fee for said propertx at the
rates in effect at the time the p roperty was connected to the
sewer system in July, 1977. (Total fees due -$1,390.50)
(3) Conside r a tion of motion authorizing credit of monthly sewer service
fees ag ainst annexation fees payab le provided t hat ann ex ation
proceedings are initiated with 120 days and applicab l e fees p a id.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to ad j ourn
(2 4) DISTRICT 11
(25)
(26)
Other busi ness and commu n ications or s u pp l eme n ta l agenda i terns, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ '. 11
DI STR ICT 5
Consideration of actions re Draft Environmental Impact Report f or· Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer :
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d )
Consideration of motion authoriz in g the General Manager to fi l e
Notice of Comp l etion of Dr aft EIR re Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer in
accordance with the Ca li forni a Environme n tal Quality Ac t of 1970,
as ame n ded (
Con side ration of motion est:iblishing i\.lt / '/ as the
final date for which all comments must be r.c~eive d on the Draft
Envi ronmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer
(to be determined by the Board)
\ I' ,.,~u Consideration of mo t .ion fixing \\', lP at P .M.
at \'v ~'") as the da c , time and place for public
h earing on the Dra ft Env ironme nt a l Impact Report for B:iysidc Drive
Trunk Se iver (date, time and p l ace to be dete r mined by the Board)
Consideration of motion directin g the staff to notice th e
r esidents alon g 13:iysidc Drivu of the llistrict 's p roposed project
advisin g them of the date, time :ind ploce of the publi c hearing
on the Draft Environ me nt al Impact RE'port for t he Bayside Drive
Trunk Se 1..-er
(2 7) nI STRICT 5
Other busines s and con nunications or supp lcmerit a l a genda items , if any
(28) nJSTRl CT S
Conside ration o f mo tion to adjourn
-8-
'
(S)
/V'\lS
•BOARDS OF DIRECT011S
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Ave nue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Te lephones:
Area Code 71..C
5..C0-2910
962-2..Cl l
AGENDA
ADJOU RNMENTS POSTED .. ::-
CO MP & MILEAGE ..... ~ •.•
FILES SET UP ..... ~ ........... .
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFOR MATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPART MENI HEAD, IN ADDITION) STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROO M ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROO M,
RES OLU1lOUS CERTli'IED .. ~
LErm:s 1·rn;Ti~tL ..........•
MIN UTES WRITTEN .. ~ •••
MINUTES mrn ..... ~.-
(1) Pledge of Alleg iance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointm ent of Cha i r me n pro t e rn, if necessary
(4 ) Re cogni tion of specia l gu e sts
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMEN TAL AGEND A
Consid e r ation of mo t ion to r eceive an d fil e minute excerpts f r om t he
foll owing c iti e s reg arding e l ect i on of mayors and appointment of
alterna t es an~ seating new members of the Bo ards : (*Mayo r )
Distri c t Ac t ive Alte rnate
~rpts, if any
Lowing me etings,
ur.n1 ·-·--·~ Sa l Gam bina*
Sal Gamb i na*
Brea
A/C .... TKlR ••••
Buena Park
La Hab r a
SA
Stanton
Yorb a Linda
2
3
3
2
U.l!> L J:J.l..L J
District 6
Di s trict 7
Don a l d L. Fo x
Me lvin J. Le Ba r on .
Lester J. Reese
Ea rl C. Ro ge t
Beth Gi~~~t 5a ~upt*
Henry W. We daa*
Don R. Griffin*
Beth Graham *
Marion Cor bet t ~·'t.~tr
J oseph M. Whee l er
Irwin M. Fried
-·, --·-, --o ~
Ma r ch 14, 1979 , regul ar
Ma rch 14 , 1979, regular
District ll Marc h 14, 1979 , regu l a r
(7) ALL DI STRICT S
FILE --Re po r t s o f :
LETTER ···--~ Joint Ch a irma n
AfC .... TKlR ·-·
··-·-.. --Gen e r a l Ma na ge r
.... _.. .. -··-···---·· ..... @ Ge ne ral Co uns e l
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll cal l vote motion r atifying payment of claims of
ROLL CALL vorr __ the joint and individu a l Distr ict s as follows: (Each Director shall
be called onl y once a n d that vote wi ll be regard ed as the same fo r each
Distr ict represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to v ot e
differently fo r any District .)
AL L DIS TRICTS
Joint Operatin g Fu n d -See page(s) "A" and "C"
~~~~--~~~~
Capital Outlay Revo l v i ng Fund -See page(s) "A" and "C"
~~~~--~~~~
DISTR I CT NO. 1 -NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 -See page(s)
DI STR I CT NO. 3 _ See page (s)
DISTR I CT NO. 5 _ See page(s) "B II
DISTRI CT NO. 6 _ NONE
DISTR I CT NO . 7 -NONE
DISTRIC T NO . 11 -NONE
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
CON SENT CAL EN DA R
ITEMS NO S . 9 (A) T HROUG H 9 (cc )
Al l ma tters p l aced -upon the consent calendar are considered
as no t requirin g discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item i s requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the pub l ic in attendance, there wi l l be no separate
discuss i on of these items . All items on t h e consent calendar
wil l be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
con sent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shal l be considered in t he .regul ar order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent ca l endar-shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designat e by letter the item to be
removed from the consent ·calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman wil l determine if any items are to be deleted from . ~
the consent calendar . (cc.) \~ ~ ~ s-~ ~ \ Q 1 )
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
FI LE •.•...............
LETTER •.............
A/C ••.. TKLR ....
FILE .••.•...•••.•...•. ~~
~-···
FILE •...............•.
LETTER •..•..•..•...•
t1~tf ... :::.
FILE ···········-·····
LETTER -·····-·--·
A/C .... TKLR ·-·
FILE -··········-·-
LETTER ···---
A/C .... TKl R -
·-·-··-········-····--
-·--··············-.. -
FILE ···-·············
LETTER ··-·········
A/C .... TK lJ .•..
~l>..V. ....... .
/ dlW···-·-·-
LETIER ·······-
!l_C .... TKlj.]_ ~:.~ .. ~=--··-
~···-~··-
LITTER ·········--
A/C .... TKL~~ ~~~·--~
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Chlorination Facilities Refurbishment
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2 , authorizing an addition of
$686.4S to the contract with equinox-malibu for additional
work on handrail and painting on post-chlorination pipe, and
granting a time extension of SS calendar days for completion
of said work. See page "E"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-39, accepting Chlorination
Facilities Refurbishment at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2,
as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion, and
approving Final Closeout Agreement . See page "F"
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
negotiate and issue purchase orders for replacement of proprieta ry
instruments at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 damaged by lightning storm for ·a
maximum amount of $2S,OOO plus tax and freight
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
solicit proposals and issue purchase orders for portable buildings,
installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appurtenances
required for -an operations and maintenance yar d at the Sewage
Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon landfill site, for a
maximum amount not to exceed $20,000
(e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to the
plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue
Pump Station, Job No. I-lR, authorizing an addition of $1S,119.00
to the contract with Triad Mechanical, Inc. , for -relocation of
power panel necessitated by a change in Southern California Edison
Company requirements and for miscellaneous modifications in steel
piping; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for
completion of said work. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of notion authori z in g ar.cl r at ifying action of
General Manager re issuance of emergency purchase orders 1n
connection with repair of main sewage pump No . 7 located at
Headworks "C" for a maximum amount not to exceed $1S ,OOO
(g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks ,
Specification No. A-096, to Trans-West Ford for the total amount
of $3S,6167 00; and rejecting alternate bid of Bob Johnson GMC .~s not
in compliance with the specifications. See page "H"
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recom-
mendation and awarding purcha se in connection with Specification
No. A-097 of two (2) 6-cylinder, manual transmi ssion pickups, for the
total amount of $10,20S.68, and one (1) 8-cylinder, automatic trans-
mission pick, for the amount of $S,779.12, to Bob Johnson GMC; and
rejecting bids of Th e ordore Robbins Ford and Fairview Ford as not in
compliance with the specifications for said 8-cylinder pickup truck.
See pages "H-2" and "I"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSE NT CALE NDAR continued from page 3)
1'1(11 ................. .
1.E1TER .......... •·
~·~.: ..
FILE •• _ ............ )
LEITER~~ ..
A/C .... TKLR ....
FILE _____ ....... _
LETTE~-
A/C .... TKLR -·
FILE ............ :-:_::..--,T-
~.W
A/C .... TKLR -·
FILE -··-··-·····
LEnER ............. .
A/C .... TKLR .. ..
Qp.4~il:.~·
FILE ... " .. ·-·--·
LETT ER ..... ---···
A/C .... TKLR -
FILE ........... 7 -
@ .. ~ ..... ..
A/C .... TKLR .. .
~ ... ~ ...... v
~--
A/C .... TKLR ~ ~,.Q.:~ .. -
FI LE __ ....... ..
LETTER ....... --
A/C .... TKLR -
FILE ____ ........
LETTER .. ----·-
A/C .... TKLR ....
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
negotiate and issue purchase order for replacement of complete
track and roller system on Districts' 1970 caterpillar front
end loader for an amount not to exceed $15,000
(j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
John Owings, dated March 23, 1979, in th e amount of $717 .09 for
alleged damage to his cement mixer, and refer to the Districts'
liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Steven Allan Simmons, dated March 24,1979, in the amount of
$60.00 for alleged damage ·to his vehicle, and refer to the
Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Robert D. Fatland,-dated March26, 1979, in the amount of $181 .75
for alleged damage to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts'
liability claims administrator for appropriate action
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to .
issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 36928 to Clifford
Forkert, increasing the total amount from $4500 to $5250 for
additional engineering services required in connection with
design of Under Drain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17
(n) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the
plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkler System for Existing
Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, changing the bid date
from March 27 to April 3, and changing a connection from the
Districts' 6-inch water line to the City of Fountain Valley's
16-inch water main instead
(o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Advance
Fire Protection Co., Inc., dated March 31, 1979, declining to
do the work in connection with Job No. PW-0 70, Fire Sprinkler
System for Exi sting Warehouse at Plant No . 1, and rejecting
their bid on the basis that the bid was received before
Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 were issued for additional work . See
page "W"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-42, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Fire
Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse .at Plant No. 1, Job
No. PW-070, to R & E Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. in the
tota l amount of $19,749.00. See pages "J" and ''K"
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-40, ame nding Positions and Salaries
Resolution No . 79-20, reclas sifying the position of Purchasing Super-
visor (Range 1057B, $1607/$2000)to the position of Buyer (Range 1053B,
$1291/$1607). See page "L"
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-41, amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 79-20, providing for an approx. 4.125% salary adjustment
to two Instrumentation Division classifications effective March 9, 1979,
pursuant to existing Memorandum of Understanding (At the March 14th mtg.
the Boards declared their intent to make said adjustments effective
March 9, 1979) See page "M"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
Fttr-····--
LETTER ···-·········
A/C .••. TKLR .••.
(@.v.:. .... 7 ..
~-V·······
A/C .•.. TKLR •••.
FILE ····-··-·-··-·
LETTER·····-·--
A/C .•.. TKLR -·
FILE ................ ..
LITTE R ............ ..
A/C .... TKLR .. ..
A /C ...• TKLR ·~ Q.:Jt.~ ... : ...
FILE ···-·········--
LETTER ·····-····-
A/C •... TKLR -·
FILE ••. -·----·-
LETTER ·······-··-·
A/C •..• TKLR ••••
FI LE ······-··-~/
A/C •..• TKL)\ ·/
~~ . .:.
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(r) Consideration of motion granting a one-half step increase (2.75%)
to Districts' Operations Engineer, Bill Fox, from Range 1061G ,
Step 4 .5 ($2508/mo.) to Step 5 ($2577/mo.) in recognition of
achieving his State registration as Chemical En gin eer effective 4 /20/79
DISTRICTS 1 & 6
(s) Consideration of Resolution No . 79-43, approving and authorizing
execution of temporary construction and permanent Easement Deeds
to the City of Costa Mesa in connection with construc tion of the
Hyland Avenue Storm Drain at no cost to the City. See page "N"
DISTRICTS 2 & 5
(t) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase and sale of
approximately 550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at
the current price of $28.00 per foot by District No. 2, for use
in construction of the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l,
from District No. 5 (said pipe previously purchased by Di s trict
No. 5 under Contract No. 5-20A)
DISTRICT 2
(u) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l,
specifying that the pipe to be f urnishe d b y the Di str ict has been
manufactured in 18-foot lengths.
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-44-2, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, to John A. Artukovich
Sons, Inc. in the amount of $189,970.00. See pages "0" and
"P"
(w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg)
Sub-Trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20, authori z ing an addition
of $5,914.96 to the contract with Christeve Corporation for changes
in conditions not indicated on the plans, and granting a time
extension of 75 calendar days for completion of the additional
work. See page "Q"
(x) Consideration of motion approving Change Drder No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg)
Subtrunk, Contracts Nos . 2-19 and 2-20, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities for a total incre ase of $12,415.50 to
the contract with Christeve Corporation. See page "R"
(y) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-45-2, accepting Richfield
Sub-Trunk and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-trunk, Contracts Nos. 2-19
and 2-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a No tice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See p age "S"
(CONSENT CAL ENDAR ·continued on page 6)
-5-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
FILE -
LffiER ••••.••••••
A/C •... TKLR •••
FILE ·······-·-·-
LETIER ···········-
A/C .... TKLR ....
Q§>~L
LETTER ·----
A/C .@ .. -
-··-··············-·
..,...._ .................. .
DISTRICT 3
· (z) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor , a portion of Reach 7 ,
Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $20,699 .50 to the
contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for a change in paving
requirements, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for
completion of additional work. See page "T"
(aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the
plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $7,637 .50 from
the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. See page "U "
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(bb) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-46, approving plans and
specifications for Santa Ana River Siphon, Contract No. 5-21,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. See page "V"
DISTRICT 5
~Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit
proposals for engineering services in connection with design
of the Big Canyon Drainage Area sewage system (~~)
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items del~ted from consent calendar, if any
-6-.
. .
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Conunittee and consideration of motion to r ece ive
and file the Committee's written report
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Exe cutive Committee:
~·"/ ~)!:_~·m (a) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, proposed
A~_c ___ @_ .. ·.T •. K.-Llt·-·iY"··-M \ ( amendment to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (S AWPA)
_ _ ~ agreement re deferred payment of supplemental treatment and
capital replacement costs (see Executive Committee report)
(2) ~-······-~-/ ~~-·-
A/C ··@ ···y" {Y) IS
Review of Draft Financial Plan and Revenue Program by
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company
Consideration of motion approving Draft Financial Plan and
Revenue Program, in principle, and declaring that said Financial
Plan and Revenue Program is in compliance with the intent of
applicable regulations, and authorizing submittal of Financial
Plan and Revenue Program to State Water Resources Control Board
for approval (copy enclosed with agenda material)
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
ff\)£ (13)
ITEMS O N
FILE ~.1,1?.mM~NTAL AGENDA
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Ge n e ral Couns e l at the
As sociation of Me tropol i tan Se werage Ag encies' Attorneys ' Seminar on
enforcement in St. Louis, Missouri, on April 4 , 1979; a nd a uthorizing
r e imbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewi th LET'°
A/C .... KLR ••••
···············-··-·· ... (14) DISTRICT 1
--·····-------communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(15) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn <(? :u7
.(16) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~,·o '7
(18) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn y: v7
(20) DISTRICT 6
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTnICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:o/
-7-
(2 2 ) 111 STRI CT 7
• Oth e r u11::;j 11 es s :rnd con1m1111ic;i tions or ~11pplemeD~J} ag e nda items , if any
tTEM S OH (22-a) Consideration of S t and:.iru Rc~o luti on t\o. 79-~7. orue ring annc-xation of
SUPPLEMEN TALAGENDA v/ 1.1 7 0 acre s o f territ ory t o th e Di s trict in th e vicinity of th e int ersection
f!L E ·····,;la¢ M{S of P l ant e ro :.incl ~:illey Q1'.ai l in Le111on ll ci~hts in tlw 11orth_·1 us~in area,_
W.V't proposed Anncx:it1on No. 8·1 -Chou Annexation to County Sanitation lhstr1ct
~c .... t~1 ~-~-<;b t ~No . 7 ~~~~~~:· ~
ITE MS ON (22-b) @ Report of Gener:i l Counsel on proposed agreement with City of Oran ge
SU PPLEMENT~MD,lr ······· for collection of sei.·e r conn ec tion charges
9FllE ---;_--;;··/ (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79 -'t.~7, approving agreement with
City of Orange for collection of sewer connection charge s , and Roll Call Vote or Cast A/C .... TKLR -Una nimo us Ballot rn Js rescinding Agreement Jmplementing County Sanitation Di s trict No. 7
···-·-··-·--
(2 2-c)
~--·~····-·
C!§~n:~~
,tr) ls
A/C .... TKLR ••.•
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
FILE ·······-··-··-· ~st ... ~
A/C .... TKLR -·
Q~---~
Q~ ... -.. :::::.
FILE ···-·····----
Ordinan ce No. 7 0 5. Sec p:ige "1'' (Agreement in Dist. 7 Directors ' folders)
Consideration of items relative to property loc~ted at 1701 Sirrine
Drive , Santa Ana, Assessor's Parcel No. 503-1 94-26 , whjcl1 is currenqy
outsid e th e boundaries of District No. 7 and the 70th Sewer Maintenance
District:
(1 ) Con s id e ration of motion establ ishing a month l y sewer service fee
in the amount of $30 unti l said property is annexed t o the District .
(2) Consideration of motion estab l ishing t h e annexation acreage fee
and District annexa tion processing fee for said property at the
r ates in effect at the time the property was connected to the
sewer system in July, 1977. (Total fees due -$1 ,390.50)
(3) Consideration of motion authorizing credit of monthly sewer service
fees ag:iinst annexation fees pay able provided th a t annexation
proceedings are initiated wi t h 1 20 days and applicab l e fees paid.
DISTRICT 7
Co n s idera t ion of mo tion to a djourn ~; 0.9
DISTRICT 11
Ot her bu siness and communicat ions or suppl emental agenda items , if any
DISTRIC T 11
Consid e ration of motion to ad jou rn ~·, D '1
DISTRICT 5
Consi d e ration of actions re Draft Environmental I mpact Report for Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer:
(a) Co n siderati on of mo t ion authorizin g the Genera l Mana ge r to fil e
Noti ce of Comp leti on of Draft EIR r e Ba)'side Drive Trunk Sewer in
acc ord a nc e with th e Californ ia En vironme n tal Qua l it)' Act of 1 97 0 ,
as am e nd e d
Con siderati on of motion establishing ~\ :;-
fin a l d ate for wh ich all comme n ts mu stbc'ci vcd on th e
Environme nt a l I mp:i c t Report for Bays id e Drive Trunk Sewer
(t o be determined by the Board)
as the
Dr aft
___ ............. -.. -(c) Con sidera t ion of motiop fixing ~ 1$ at 1 :3-o P .M.
FILE-···--/ at N ~~~as the d c , time and place for public Q~ ?? h earing on the Dr a ft Envonme nta l l mp a ct Re p o rt for Baysid e Ori ve
/ LE TTE ---T(r_,.~~~~,!~r~~.'~,~~m~-~~ .pl ace to bC' determined by the Board)
A/C .... TKtR -.v-r~ ·-'-""'''\:)~~~ '"""'"~)
. / -·-··-······-··-·-(d) C o n ~id e ration of 1no t~ on d i :ectin g the ~taf~ to notice th e liJ...o ~~ _>J r e s~~~nts a l ong B:iy s 1dc l ln v~· of the Dist.n ct ' s propo~ed pro ?e c t ~ -~ct ad vis 1nr. them of th e <l :ite, time and pl :.ic e of the public h e arrng
on th e Dra ft Enviro n me nta l I mpact Repor t for th e Bayside Dr i v e
Trunk S e wer
~nI STR lCT S
1 ,.,0tl.{c r husin ess and corrnnun ~c:.i t ions or supp l ement a l agen<la it.em s , i f ;my ~C!J-~,Q_~
(28) nrsTRTCT 5 -' --~
Con s ide rati o n of mo tj on to adjourn ~: / 3
-8-
I . BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
II
County San it4ti on Oi5tricts
of Orange County, Cal iforn ia
DISTRICTS 2 & 3
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLE MEN TAL AGENDA ITEMS
APRIL llJ 1979 -7:30 P.M.
. Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-24 11
AGENDA
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the
following cities regarding e lection of mayors and appointment of
alternates and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City District
Bre a 2
3
Buena Park 3
La Habra 2
3
-!\
n
Stanton 3
Yorba Linda 2
ALL DISTRICTS
Active
Donald L. Fox
Melvin J. LeBaron
Lester J. Reese
Earl C. Roget
Beth Graham*
Martha V. Weishaupt*
Henry W. Wedaa*
Alternate
Sal Gambina*
Sal Gambina*
Don R·. Griffin*
Beth Graham*
Marion Corbett
Joseph M. Wheeler
Irwin M. Fried
(13) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of General Counsel at the
Association of Met ropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Attorneys' Seminar on
enforcement in St. Louis, Missouri, on April 4, 1979; and authorizing
reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith
DISTRICT 7
(22-a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-48-7, ordering annexation of
1 .170 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the intersect ion
of Plantero and Valley Quail in Lemon Heights in the north Tustin area,
proposed Annexation No. 84 -Chou Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7
(Item #22 continued on page 2)
,. .... --~~
DISTRICT 7 (continued)
(22-b) (1) Report of General Counsel on proposed agreement with City of Orange
for collection of sewer connection charges
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-49-7, approving agreement with
City of Orange for collection of sewer connection charges, and
rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7
Ordinance No. 705. See page "I" (Agreement in Dist. 7 Directors' folders)
(22-c) Consideration of items relative to property located at 1701 Sirrine
Drive, Santa Ana, Assessor's Parcel No. 503-194-26, which is currently
outside the boundaries of District No. 7 and the 70th Sewer Maintenance
District: ·
(1) Consideration of motion establishing a monthly sewer service fee
in the amount of $30 until said property is annexed to the District.
(2) Consideration of motion establishing the annexation acreage fee
and District annexation processing fee for said property at the
rates in effect at the time the property was connected to the
sewer system in July, 1977. (Total fees due -$1,390.50)
(3) Consideration of motion authorizing·credit of monthly sewer service
fees against annexation fees· payable provided that annexation
proceedings are initiated with 120 days and applicaple fees paid.
-2-
..... _., ........
, ' ..,..~ .. -----~
RESOLUTION NO. 79-48-7
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ORANGE FOR
COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR
COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES AND
RESCINDING THE EXISTING AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTING
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ORDINANCE
-NO. 705 WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * •.
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 enacted Ordinance
No. 705 providing for :rules and regulations relating to connections
to District sewage facilities, establishing charges therefor; and,
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 and the City of Orange
made and entered into an agreement dated July 18, 1962, which
provided for, among other provisions, the collection of connection
charges imposed by County Sanitation District No. 7 pursuant to
Ordinance No: 705, as amended; and,
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 and·the City of Orange
have determined that the terms and conditions of the presently-existing
agreement are no longer in the practical best interests of the
respective parties, and, therefore, desire to rescind said agreement
and re-enter into a new and different agreement setting forth the
intent of the parties as of this date; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Orange has approved the agreement for
collection of .the sewer connection charges as proposed by County
Sanitation District No. 7;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 does hereby resolve:
Section 1. That certain agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A"V
providing for the collection of sewer connection charges by the
·" 1-1" AGENDA ITEM #22(s)(2) -DISTRICT 7 "l-1".
r.-.• --=·
City of Orange, is hereby approved, to be effective April 11, 1979.
Section 2. That the General Manager, the District Chairman
and Secretary, and the General Counsel are all instructed and
authorized to prepare and execute all necessary documents
required to implement the provisions of Ordinance No. 716 of
County Sanitation District No. 7 pertaining to the establishment
of sewer connection charges and to implement the provisions of the
above-referenced agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
II 1-2" AGENDA ITEM #22(B)(2) -DISTRICT 7 "1-2"·
T
fMNAGER 'S AG ENDA REPORT
County Sanitatio n Districts
-of Orange County, California
JOI NT BOARDS
Meeting Date
APRIL 11 , 1979 -7:30 P.M .
Post Offi ce Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708
To le phones:
Area Code 71 4
540-29 10
962-2-411
The followin g is a brief exp l anation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on th e e nclosed agenda and which
are n ot otherwi se self-explanatory . Warrant lists are enc l osed
with the agenda material summari z ing the bills paid since the l a st
Joint Bo ard meetin g .
To minimi ze the amoun t of redundancy a nd duplication in the
agenda material a nd reduce the number of comments in the Manager 's
Report, we h ave expanded the description of the agenda items in the
agenda it se lf , particularly with regard to change ord ers and con-
trac ts which have been pub li c ly bid and are within the contract
budget or e n gineer 's est imate. Detailed change orders are included
in th e supporting materia l as ~ell as the bi~ tabulations for the
co ntracts b e ing recommended for award.
J oint Boards
No. 9 -a -Ch a n ge Order No. 1 -Chlorin ation Facility Refurbish -
me n t at Treatment Plant No . 2, Job No. J-4-2 .
This change ord er is for additiona l work on the existing hand -
r ai l at thi s fac ility as well as addit i ona l painting on the po st -
chlo r ination pipe . Th e staff recommends app rova l of this change
order in the tota l add amount of $68 6.45, plus the approval of the
time exten s ion o f 55 calendar days .
No. 9-b -Accept a nce o f Job No. J-4 -2 -Chlorinat i on Facili ty
Refur bis hm ent at Treatment Plant No. 2 .
. The contractor has complet e d all the work and contractu a l
obligations for the r efurbi shme n t of this Chlorination Facility a t
Tre atment Plant No . 2 . The staff recommends acceptance of th e work,
execution of the Fina l Cl oseout Agreemen t, ·a nd the filing of th e
n ecessary Notic e of Compl e tion. (Tot a l contrac t, $1 38 ,186.45).
9-c -Replacement of Recording In struments Damap,ed b y Lig htening
Ma rch 14th.
On J a nuary 30, 19 79 , we suffered mod erate dama ge to several
r ecording and transmitting instrume n ts at Treatment Plant No. 2
du e to a l i g ht ening strike . These instruments were partially re-
p a i red by the Districts ' instrument r e pair g r oup u sing stocked
repl acement components.
On March 14, 1979, we had a second occurrence on the 100
p a ir cable connecting Plants 1 and 2 . This apparently was more
severe and r es ulte d in extensive damage to instruments in both
P l ants. -
Our inst rum ent rep air group i s p ro ceeding with bench repairs
as well as installation of protective dev ices on these critical
in strument l oops . However, since the necessary repair components
are of a propr i etary nature , it i s anticipated that we wi ll exceed
the $4,500 limit established in the Districts' purchas ing resolution.
Th e staff is recommending that the Gener a l Manager be auth orized
to ne gotiate and i ssue purchase orders to several suppliers for the
procurement of th ese rep air and replacement componen ts not to exceed
$25,000 plus tax and frei gh t .
No. 9-d -Portab le BulldinR . Fencing and Appurtenances for
Coyote Canyon Land fil l Sludge Processing.
Th e Districts expect to move onto the Coyote Canyon landfil l
sludge processing site in the near future. At that time , we wi ll
n eed a portable lunch/locker building and materials storage shed .
Also, chain link yard fencing as requi red in the operating permits.
It is an tici pated that a ll of the necessary units can be
obtained in conformance with the Districts' approved standard
purchasing practices . However, in the even t that more than one
item is furnished by the same supplier, i t is possible that th e
$4,500 limit wi ll be exceeded .
The staff i s recomme nding that the General Manager be autho -
ri zed to solicit proposals and is s ue purchase orders for portable
b ui l dings, installation of fencing, fuel and water tanks and appur -
tenances require d for the operations and ma i ntenance yard at Coyote
Canyon l andfi ll sludg e processing s ite in an amount no t to exceed
$20,000.
No. 9-e -Ch ange Order No. 1 to Job No . I -lR, Rehabilitation
of Ellis Avenue Pump Station.
Tri ad Mechanical, Inc., the Con tractor for this rehabilitation
work, had to r e lo cate the power panel due to a lack of space in the
area origina ll y shown on th e p l ans . This rel ocation was r e quired
bec ause of the Edi son Company 's safety orders. This chan~e order
a l so covers the necessary miscellaneous modifications in stee l
piping and equipment due to the equ i pment changes, as well as a
time ex tension of 20 calendar days . The staff recommends app roval
of this change order in an amount of $15,11 9 and a time extens i on of
20 calendar days.
-2-
No . 9-f -Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Sewage Pump.
On Thursday, March 15th, one of the Di stricts ' l arge 30-inch
(45MGD) raw sewage pumps , located at Plant No. 2 Headworks, had a
mech ani cal failure which required extensive machine-shop type
repair work, including the making of a comp l ete new shaft.
Due to the urgency , it was decid ed (with the c oncurrence of
the Joint Chairman), to proceed with the machine shop work on an
emergency basis . Quotations were obtained from two local machine
shops to make the new shaft and repair the backing plate and bearing
housing . The low quote fo r this work is approximately $8,500 (it
may vary sligh tly due to amounts of material actua lly us ed). They
estimated that the work could be completed in 14 to 20 days -(Th e
factory est imated 1 8 -20 weeks).
Th e total estimated cost fo r thi s repair is $15,000 with all
o ther parts (b earings, wear rings, s eals , etc.) obtained through
the District s ' no rma l purchasing procedures . The Staff is request-
ing r at ificatio n of the General Manager 's action in this mat ter.
No. 9-g & h -Purchase of Two 9-Yard Dump Trucks and Three
Picku Trucks (2 Six-C linder, Manua l Transmissions and 1 Ei ht-cy inder, Automatic Transmission .
The responsible l ow bidder for the dump trucks is Trans-West
Ford, Font ana, in the amount of $35,616 and the lowest responsible
bidder for the pickup trucks is Bob Johnson GMC of Long Beach in
the amo unt of $15,984.80. The s t aff recommends authorization for
pur chase of the vehicles.
No. 9-i -Rep air of Front End Loader.
Th e Districts' 1970 966 Caterpillar front-end lo ader is out
of service due to needed replacement of the complete track and
roll er system.
It is requested that the staff be authorized to negotiate
and award a p u rchase order contract f or the r epair n ot to excee d
$15,000.
Proposals will be solicited fr om a ll known sources by the
Purcha s ing Division.
No. 9-j, k, & 1 -Denyin g Claims for Dama ges.
Th ree damage claims have been recieved. The staff recommends
they be d e nied and referred to the Districts' liability claims
administrator for approp riate act ion .
-3-
No. 9 -m -Approval of Change Order to Purchase Order to
Cl ifford Forkert in Connection with En ineerin for Di ester
C eaning Beds at Plant No. 1 .
Clifford Forkert, a licensed surveyor, a.ssisted the staff
i n the preparation of plans and specifications for the Under Drain
System for Di ges ter Cleanin g Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job
No. P l-17, whose work included engineering and surveys of the
existing bed area. Services in addition to those origina l ly re -
quest ed were r equire d to complete the work which resulted in the
t otal compensation exceeding the $4,500 limi t a uthoriz ed in the
Districts ' purch as ing re solution . The staff recommends approval
of a $750 increase to this purchase order , making the total amount
of this work $5,250.
No. 9 -n -Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to Fire Sprinkler System for
Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW -0 70 .
The staff is requesting approval of Addendum No. 1 to this
contract which ext ends the date of receipt of bids from March 27,
1 979 to April 3, 1979 in order to issue a subsequent addendum
cl arifying adequate pressures for wate r services.
The staff also requ ests approval of Addendum No . 2 to this
contract which delet es a connection to the Districts ' 6-inch wate r
main as originally specified a nd instead connects to the City of
Fountain Valley's 16-inch steel water line in Ellis Avenue. This
chan ge is nec essary to insure adequate water pressure for the fire
protection system. This addendum also holds the contractor respon -
s i bl e for all labor and materials, meter charges, application fees
and inspection fees as well as permits from the City o f Fountain
Va l ley .
The staff recommends approval of these two addenda .
No. 9-0 -Award of Contract No . PW-070 -Fire Sorinkler Svstem
f or Exi s ting War ehouse at Plant No . 1 .
On Tuesday, Apri l 3rd, bids were r eceived for the automatic
s p rinkl er system for the existing ware house facilities at Plant
No . 1. Eight bids were received which included a bid inadvertently
opened by the staff from a contractor who h ad requested withdrawal
of his bid submitted February 27th. The bid did not acknowledge
Addend a Nos . 1 and 2 calling for a connection to the City water
main in Ellis Avenue . Th e staff recommends rejection of the bid
of Advance Fire Protection Company, Inc. (Item 9 (o) (1).
The seve n rema ining bids ranged from a l ow o f $19,749 to a
h igh of $34,400. The staff recommends award of the contract to
-4 -
R & E Indust ria l Fire Protec tion , In c., o f Ve ntur a (Item 9(o) (2).
This proj ect has been discussed wi th this c ontractor and he is
a ware of a ll provisions contained there and i s satisfied with his
bid (Engineer's estimate -$1 9,000).
No. 9-p -Purchasing Divi sion Po sition Reclassifications.
During the past few years, the Districts ' purchasin g and
warehousing functions have been reorganized and the activities
centrali zed under the new position of Procurement and Property
Chief. Recently, our Purchasin g Supervisor retired after 20 years
\vi th the Districts. The staff now r ecomm ends that the position of
Purchasing Supervisor (Range 10 57B , $1607/$2000) be reclassified to
Buyer (R ange 1053B , $1 291/$1607) to reflect a realignment of respon -
sibilities and compl ete the reorganiz ation .
No. 9 -q -Amend~ng Positions and Salaries Resolution re
In strumentation Divis ion.
Pur suant to the Memorandum o f Understanding executed with the
Op erations and Ma intenance personne l in JRnua ry, 1 979, the staff
has been meeting and conferring with the OC EA representatives
r e l ative to the realignmen t of those instrumentation classifications
which are not competitive paywise with comparable positions in other
s ewe r age agencies within th e State . As a result of a job valida -
tion study, we determined that two classifications in the instru-
mentation division were 4 .125% under the averag e of the seven
agencies s u rveyed; Lead Instrumentation Man and the Journeyman
p osition , Instrumentation Technician II . Four District personnel
will be affected by this adjustment.
Last month, the Boar d declared its intent to make any adjust-
ments effec t ive March 9th. The staff recommends adoption of
Resolution No . 79-41 providing for a salary adjustment for these
t wo classifications of 3/4 Range (4.125%).
No. 9-r -Grant ing 2.75% Salary Adjustment to Operations
En gineer .
The Districts ' Operat i ons Engineer has jus t received notice
of his State registration as a Chemical Engineer . In recognition
of his achievement, I am re commend ing that he receive a one -half
step increase (2. 75 %) within his salary range, effective April 20th.
Di stricts 1 and 6
No. 9-s -Approval of Temporary Constru c~i on Easement and
Pe rmanent Storm Drain Easement to the City of Costa Mesa , from
Di stricts 1 and 6, for Construction of Hy land Avenue Storm Drain .
The City of Cost a Mesa, in conjunclion with the County Flood
-5-
Co n t r o l Distr ict, is co n structing a storm dr ain in t h e proposed
Hyl a n d Avenue norther l y of the San Diego F reeway and wester l y of
Harb or Boulevard . The alignment traverses the fee easement j ointly
own ed by Districts Nos. 1 and 6 . This easement was orig ina l ly
owned by District No . 1 which conveyed 16~ feet of the 20-foot
easement to District No. 6. This action appearing on the agenda
g r ants a permanent storm drain easement and a temporary construction
easement to the City for the storm drain that wil l be in the n ewly
p roposed Hy l and Avenue .
The staff recommends approval of these easements to the City
of Costa Mesa at no cost .
Di stricts 2 and 5
No. 9 -t -Sale of District No. 5 24-Inch Ductile Cast Iron
P ipe to District-No . 2 .
The staff is recommending the purchase of approximately
550 feet of 24-inch ductile cast iron pipe at the curr ent price of
$28/foot by Di strict No . 2 from District No. 5 for use in con -
str uction of the Olive Subtrunk Siphon. The Olive Subtrunk repair
i s required as a result of dam age caused by last year's heavy
s t orm flow in the Santa Ana River . District No. 5 purchased
approximat e ly 10,000 feet of pipe originally for the Back Bay
Drive sewer construction; hcwever, the State Coastal Comm ission
overruled the Regional Coastal Commi ssio n and a permit was not
i ssued . The District No. 5 Board then d ec lared the pipe surplus.
Th e District 5 Board is cont empla ting the inst a llation of 3100
feet of pipe for replacement of a portion of the Baysi de Drive
Sewer. The sale of 550 feet of pipe to District No. 2 wi l l not
affect this project.
District 2
No . 9-u -~pproval of Addendum No . 1 to the Plans a nd Speci-
fications for th e Olive Subtrunk Repair, Contract No . 2-5R-l .
The staff is requesting approval of this addendum which
specifies that the pipe being furnished by the Di strict has beeu
man u factured in 18-foot len gths . The staff recommend s approval
of this addendum which clarifies the plans .
No. 9 -v -Award of Job No . 2-5R-l -Olive Subtrunk Repair . ----
Bids were r ece ived on March 27th for th e Olive Subtrunk
Repair, Job No. 2-5R-l . 'I"wo bids were received for th is work ;
$189 ,970 and $225 ,005. (En g inee r 's estimate -$173,000). The staff
r ecommends approval and award of this job to the lowest responsib l e
bidder, John A. Artukovich Sons, I nc . We expect to rec e ive $79,000
from the Federal Disaster Office. The District is repl acingt:lle~
washed out gra vity line with u deep siphon. The Federal Disast er
office will only fund replacement of wl1at was lost.
-6 -
-
No . 9-w & x -Ap~rova l of Change Orders Nos. 1 an d 2 to
Contracts Nos. 2-19 an 2-20 -Richfield Subtrunk and Orchard
(Kellogg) Subtrunk .
This contract for the construction of the Richfie l d Subtrunk
and Orchard (Kellogg ) Subtrunk, which was awarded in June, 1978,
is now complete. Chan g e Order No. 1 includes three changed con -
ditions not correctly s hown on the plans . On Contract No . 2 -19,
an excess ively large water line thrust block necessitated the
r e lo cat i on of the Contractor 's tunnel pit , and a 36-inch gas main
was incorrectly shown on the plans, necessitating a modification
·to the pipe alig nment.
On Contract No . 2-2 0, an 8-inch PVC irrigat ion line was
encountered which was not indicated on the p l ans . The tot a l
additional amount to the Contr act was $5,9 1 4 .96. Additiona ll y,
th ere is a time extension of 75 calendar days on this change order
cov e ring the time reouired to complete the chanQ.ed conditions. and
for inclement weather , as wel l as for delays in procurement of pipe.
Ch ang e Order No. 2 to these contracts is a n adjustment of
engineer's qua ntities increasing the cont~act by $1 2 ,415.50, cover-
ing an increase in 54-inch casing and an increase i n 27 -i nch VCP,
a deduct in 27-inch VCP with a different bedd i ng requirement, and
sewer supports, and an addit ion of four feet o f a 60-inch manhole.
The staff recomm e nds approval of these change orders.
No. 9 -y -Acee tance of Con tracts Nos. 2-19 and 2 -20 -
Richfiel d SubtrunI< an Orchar d Ke o g g Subtru n . ~
Th e contractor has completed a l l the work an d contractua l
obligations for the Richfie l d Subtrunk and Or char d (Kellogg)
Subtrunk . The staff recommends acceptance of the work a nd execu -
tion of the Final Cl oseout Agreement as well as the fil ing of the
nece ssary Notice of Completion.
Di strict 3
No. 9-z and aa -Change Orde r s Nos. 5 a nd 6 t o Contract No .
3-20-3 -Kno tt Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7.
Ch ange Order No. 5 to this contract adds $20,699.50 to the
contract an d is f or correction of excessive pavement damage beyond
t he contract limits specified. This dama g e was caused b y the age
of the ex i s ting pavement and it i s the r esponsib ility of the Dis-
trict to corr ect pavement de fici e ncies. Thi s change order also
includes the placement of a one -inch aspha lt over l ay a long Knott
Avenue from curb to curb, which was necessitated due to varying
condit ions of the r oad surface . Chang e Order No. 5 a l s o provides
f o r a time exten sion of ten c a l endar days .
-7-
Change Order No. 6 is the adjus t ment of engineer's qu ant ities
for this p ro ject and decreases the total contract am ount by $7,637.50.
The staff r ecomme nd s approva l of both Ch a n ge Orders Nos. 5
and 6 .
Di strict s 5 a nd 6
No. 9-bb -Approving Pl ans and Specifications for Santa Ana
Rive r Siphon, Con tract No. 5 -21 .
Th e d esign engineer has completed the design of the se cond
barre l of the Santa Ana River Siphon which is scheduled to be con -
structe d in conjunction with the widening of th e Santa Ana Ri ver by
th e County Flood Control District. The staff i s recommending
approval of the plans and specifications and the sol ici ting of com -
p e ti ti ve bids. The bi d date for this project will be established
to coincide w·i th the time commitments required by the EMA for the
River widening project. (E ngineer 's estimate -$350, 000) . Th e
Coastal Commission construction permit has been issued for the
project .
Dis trict 5
No . 9 -cc -Au thorization to Solicit Proposals for Engineering
Services r e Big Ca n yon Drainage Area .
Because of the necessity to proceed with the implem e ntation
o f either the replacement and rehabilitation of the J amboree Pump
Station or the grav i ty tunnel in J amboree Bouleva rd to accommodate
the Big Canyon Dr ainage Area, the staff is recomme nding that Requests
for Proposals be sent to responsible engineering firms to proceed
with the d e sign of the selected a lt erna~ive . (STAFF NOT E : This
a gen d a it em wil l be removed from the co nsent cal endar and considered
by the District No. 5 Board under Agenda Item No. 27 n ext Wednesday,
April 11th).
All Districts
No s . 11 and 1 2 -Repo rt of th e Exe~utive Co mmi ttee.
The Exe cutive Committee met on March 28th and a report of
th eir discussi on s and recommendations is included for active Dir ectors.
No . 26 -Draf t EIR for Rep l acement of a Portio n of t h e Bayside
Dr ive Trunk Sewer.
At th e March Board meeting, th e Directors were presented with
a dra ft c opy of th e Environmental Im pact Report (EIR) for considera-
tion at this meeting. In ord e r to comply with the CEQA rcquirem~nts,
th e Dir ectors should estab li sh a final date by which a ll comme nts
-8-
must be received, and f i x a time and p l ace fo r public hearing on
th e proposed project.
I ncluded in your agenda materia l i s a recommended invitation
to all r es id ents directly affected by construction in Bayside
Drive . The staff suggests that h ea ring notification to the residents
may prove beneficia l to b oth th e District 's staff and the City's
staff in establish ing the construction req u irements for this project .
Fred A . Harper
General Manager
-9-
ENERGY
BECOME PART OF THE SLUDGE
MANAGEMENT TEAM.
LA/OMA PROJECT
APRIL 20, 1979
10:00 A.H.
Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
1955 Workman Hill Rd.
Whittler, Ca. 90607
(213) 699-7411
·Mo1aq uo1~e~o1 a4~ ~e ·w·e 00:01 'oz ll~dV Sn NIOr 3SV3ld
TLW:pj
6/14/78
1/10/79
1/25/79
2/07/79 l
a
s
' 6
6
' 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
~24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
3.2
RE: AGENDA ITEM #22Cs)(2)
AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION
CHARGES --COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7
AND CITY OF ORANGE
THIS AGREEMENT. is made and entered into this '11th day of
April 1 1979, by and between the CITY OF ORANGE,
------~-----------
.a municipal corporation, hereinafter· referred to as "Cityu,
and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District."
"W I T N E S S E T H :
,__, --. _. ~ -~ -._ 't-'
WHEREAS, District has, by the enactment of Ordinance No. 705, .
as amended, established a schedule of sewer connection charges;
and .
WHEREAS, a 11 or a portion of the impro·ved territory of the
District is within the city limits of City; and .
WHEREAS, the Cit_y, by and through ·its Buildi!19 Department,
regulates all new construction with the City; ~nd
WHEREAS, it is for the mutual benefit of C·ity and District
that the sewer connection charges provide~ for in said
Ordinance No. 705, as amended, of the District be collected
in a manner most expedient and least burdensome for the owners
of property within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City will benefit by the construction and
maintenance of sewage fac111ties of the District within the
city limits of City by.Dis~rict from the funds to be collected
from said sewer connection charges;· and
WHEREAS, City and District have heretofore. on the 18th
day of July, 1962, ente~ed int~ an agreement for the collection
of District sewer funds, and the parties hereto have ~greed
to terminate said contract as of the date set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties
as follows:
1. City and District, for and in consideration of the
EXHIBIT "A-1"
1
2
3
4
6
• 6
'I
·a
9
10
11
12
13
·14
15
. i
i -
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.' 24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
3.2
payments which have already been made upon said or~ginal c~n
tract, and for and in consideration of the further covenants
and agreements herein set· .forth, now agree that this agreement
shall be substituted in place of and instead of said original
agreement dated July 18, 1962, and said agreement fs hereby
expressly terminated •
2. City, as agent, will and does hereby ~gree to issue
permits and collect the ~harges established by District under
said Ordinance No. 705, as amended, from time to time.
3. District shall prescribe those classifications of
charges to be co1lected by City,
4. City will account for the charges co"ll ected i\nd· remit
to.District monthly, the moni~s collected~· except as provided
in Section 7 hereof.
5. Procedures mutually agreeable to City and District
shall be established for collection and remittance of said
fees.
6. District does hereby appoint and nomihate City and its
agents and employees (as the same may be designated by City)
as agents of the District for purposes of issui~g permits and
determining and collecti~g the sewer connection charges es-
tablished under Ordinance No. 705, as amended. This does not
authorize City to act as agent for the General Manager or to
perform the duties of the General Manager of the District or· •,·
to act on behalf of the District, except·.as expressly set forth
in this agreement. ..
7. City· agrees to act as ~gent for District as herein
provided for a fee equal to five (5%) percent of the fees
collected by City for permits issued pursuant to the provisions
of this agreement. Said five (5%) percent fee of City shall
be deducted from the charges collected by City and to be re-
mitted to District pursuant to Section 4 herein.
EXHIBIT "A-2 11
··-· .
,. ~ -;: .,
;::._~ ~.
1 8. City agrees to prepare and submit to District a detailed
2 accounting statement of the fees collected thro~gh the effec-
S tfve date of this agreement under the previous agreement
4 executea the 18th day of July, 1962. and agrees to pay that
5 sum to District within thirty (30) days after the date of
6 this agreement, provided that such sum shall ha.ve deducted
7 therefrom the sum described herein to be paid to City by
8 District for the outright purchase of trunk sewer lines nos.
9 1 and 4 and sums due for the purchase of capacity rights in
10 trunk sewer lines nos. 2. 3 and 5. Any interest earned on
11 the deposits of District held by City duri~g the duration of
12 the previous agreement shall be retained by ·.and deemed vested·
13 solely in City. The earned intetest to be credited to City is
14
15
determined to be the fair and equitable reimbursement of City
monies expended for the construction of the sewer lines which
16 are the subject of this agreement,
1? 9. All sewer lines ~escribed herein have been constructed
18 · .. by City at its sole expense in accordance with the Master Plan
19 of Trunk/Subtrunk Sewers of District, both as to size and
20 location. The sale price to District shall be equal to the
21 original cost of construction of each of t·he trunk sewers.
22 City agrees to sell and District agrees to purchase in
23 accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth 1 all of the·
·.'24 right, title and interest in t.runk sewer lines nos. 1 and 4,
25 as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part
26 hereof as though fully set forth herein.
27 As to trunk sewer lines nos.· 2, 3 and 5, as more particularly
28
29
30
31
:i2
described in Exhibit "A", the City agrees to sell and District
~grees to purchase sewer capacity rights in City's trunk sewer
lines nos. 2, 3 and 5. Said sewer capacity rights shall be
equivalent and equal to that amount of sew~ge and industrial
waste that is presently being discharged into trunk sewer lines
EXHIBIT "A-3."
1 nos 2, 3 and 5, as of the date of the execution of this
2 agreement.
3 Provided, however, that the purchase of such capacity rights
4 in trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 shall give no person,
6 firm or entity, public or private, any right to use or to
6 connect to trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 without the consent
'I
8
·9
10
11
of City. Nor shall the purchase of capacity rights in
sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 permit any person, firm or
public or private, to increase the amount of sewage or
which can be placed in trunk sewer 1 ines nos. 2, 3. and
the total amount of sew~ge or effluent bei~g discharged
trunk
entity,
effluent
5, over
into
12 trunR sewe~ lines nos. ~. 3 and 5.as of· the date of the execu-
13 tion of this agree~ent, except as· City may in the future consent
14 to any such increase.
15 10. The transfer of ownership from City to District of the
16 three trunk sewers described as items nos. 2, 3 and 5 on
1'1 ·Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and the two trunk sewers described
18 ·~s items nos. l and 4 on Exhibit· "A'', att'ached her~to, shal 1
19 be 1n accordan.ce with the following provisions:
20 A. District shall, within thirty (30) days of the execution
21 of this agreement, purchase from City, and City shall sell
22 trunk sewers nos. 1 and 4 as said lines are identified on
23 Exhibit 11 A0
, .• attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
i
-24 fully set forth herein. · .
. 25 · B. The aforementioned trunk sewers nos. 1 and 4 shall be
26 purchased by the District for the total sum of $280,796,35,
27 which represents a total of $203,740.35 for trunk sewer line
28 no 1, and $77,056.00 for trunk sewer line no, 4,
29
30
C. Within thirty (30) days of execution of this ~greement,
City shall sell and District shall buy capacity rJghts in
31 trunk sewer lines nos. 2, 3 and 5 for a total sum of
3.2 $115,952.02. This $115,952.02 sum represents 90.00% of the
EXHIBIT "A-4 11
.-,. M' ·-•
,, lr •• ...
1
a
3
' 6
• 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
· 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
:
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Sl
3.2
capacity rights of trunk sewer line no. 5 and 30.20% of the
capacity rights of trunk sewer lines nos 2 and 3. The 90.00%
~apacity rights of trunk sewer line no. 5 represents 90.00%
of the capital cost of $54,575.00 and is thus calculated to be
$49,117.50 of the $115,952.02 sum. The remaining $66,834.52
sum represents 30.20% of the $221,306.35 capital cost and thus
30.20% of the capacity rights fn trunk sewer·lines nos. 2 and
3, and is based on 30.20% of the Master Planned drainage
area being within Sanitation District No. 7 boundaries as of
November 1, 1978, representi~g 30.20% of the Master Planned
sewage flows. Beginning July 1, 1979, and ea~h succeeding
July 1, the District shall pay the City (or acquisition of
additional capacity rights in trunk.sewers lines nos. 2 and 3
based on the total acres annexed within the Master Planned
drainage area in the precediilg year times $143.70, 'for a·
subtotal amount of payments in this Subsection C not to exceed
the capital cost of $221,306.35 of. trunk sewer lines nos. 2 and
· 3 •. Provided, however, City will sell to District all right,
title and interest in trunk sewer lines nos; 2~ 3 and 5 no
later than July 1, 1998, with the City reserving the e~press
right to tender the sale to District at any time prior to
said date.
O. City shall be responsible for the maintenance of trunk·
sewer lines nos. 2 and 3 duri~g s~ch time as ownership remains
wit.h City and capacity rights only ar.e granted to District.
Upon execution of this agreement, District shall be solely re-
sponsible for maintenance of sewer line no. 5, inasmuch as 90.ooi
of the capacity rights .in sewer 1 ine no. 5 are being transferred
to District pursuant to this agreement.
11. District and City agree that ff the City is presented
with a dispute as to the validity, reasonableness, enforcibilfty,
or applicability of the charges agreed .to be collected by it for
EXHIBIT "A-5"
1 the District and the City shall .notify the District of the prob-
2 lem. and the District shall take over the collection and enforce-
3 ment of its ordinances in subject cases. It f s contemplated that
4 this shall be the procedure for serious disputes made upon some
5 current legal right or basis as distinguished from crank-type
6 or ill-founded disagreements.
f 12. City shall not be liable to the District for its unin-
8 tentional and inadvertent failure to collect a connection charge
·9 actually due District or its unintentional or inadvertent mis-
. 10 calculation of the amount of the charges, fees or fees due
11 District.
12 13. District hereby agrees to hold.City free and harmless of
13 any and all liability that ~ight a~ise if any such fees collected
·14 by City shall be determined to have been illegall~ collected.
15 14. District ~grees to·provide legal services in the defense
16
1'1
18
19
20
21
22
23
of any action seeking to collect sewer connection fees alleged
to have been illegally coJle~ted.
IN WIJNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement the day and year first above written.
CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation
By~~
Mayor ATTEST:
~ i'teut4a: /)/. C}-!;no:t;--.-1 c l.(C-
City Cl erk i/ '
APPJOVED AS TO FO~~ ,4
24 ~/Nta41J~~. ~iii Attorney
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2 II
COUNTY SANITATlON DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
BY~.,..._--~~__,,..~~~._......-------~-----~---C ha i rma n, Board of 01rectors
By~=-~~~---~---_,_--...........___..__..~~~~---
S e c re tar y, Board of D1rectors ·.
Counse
EXHIBIT "A:..6"
·-. --
u
.-~
c;::, '-:.' ~ :--, O"""''
...
'• . !
I
April 10, 1979
MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
FROM: DON WINN, DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF S~ITATION AGENCIES (CASA)·
RE: CASA SPRING MEETING -MAY 4-5, MARRIOTT HOTEL, NEWPORT
BEACH
The spring meeting of the California Association of
·sanitation Agencies (CASA) is scheduled for May 4-5 in
Newport Beach. The Managers and local agency Directors'
Committees have scheduled numerous agenda items for discus-
sion Friday afternoon, some of which will be a fellow up on
items from their January meeting, such as:
1. The results of the survey on· costs of
sewer services and,
2. Proposed amendments to the Porter Cologne
Act regarding Regional Board procedures
Since. CASA is meeting in Orange County, it is an ideal
opportunity for many of our Directors to participate in the
meeting. Attached is a tentative agenda.
The President's Reception is a good opportunity to meet
Directors from other California agencies. As a member of CASA's
Board of Directors, I invite your participation.
Donald D. Winn
Attachment
"
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF .SANITATION AGENCIES
SPRING MEETING
Friday, Hay 4, 1979
10:00 a.m.
12:00-5:00 p.m.
12:30-1:00 p.m.
1:00-4:00 p.m.
1 1:00-4:00 p.m.
4:00-5:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m.
Saturday, May 5, 1979
8:00 a.m.
8:00 a.m.
8:30 a.m.
9:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
12:00 noon
1:00 p.m.
Harriott Hotel, Newport Beach
HAY 4-5, 1979
A G E N D A ------
Registration
Attorney's Committee Meeting
Executive Committee Meeting
Manager's Conunittee·Meeting
Director's Committee Meeting
Program and Conference Arrangements Committee
President's Reception
Continental Breakfast
Associates Committee Breakf as_t Meeting
Registration
General Session
Break
Luncheon
Continuation of General Session to Adjournment
Work Schedule Distribution:
Joint Chairman 1
Attorney ~ ./
Administration Y
Engineering 5
Maintenance 6
Operations 4
JCE 3
v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
WORK SCHEDULED FOR WEEK· OF APRIL 16, 1979
Department 30 -Projects/Plant Maintenance
1. Chlorine rotation of both Plants.
2. Continue sludge drying operation, Plant 1.
3. Place concrete foundation for polymer tank, Plant 1.
4. Continue remodeling of RMC building.
5. Build concrete pad for sandblasting compressor, Plant 1.
6. Repair railings at rectangular basins, Plant 2.
7. Install blocks for draining of B basin.
8. Cut ceiling joist f~r AC ducts (Administration building).
9. Finish installing acoustical tile in Administration building.
10. Continue emptying sludge bed, Plant 2.
11. Start painting at Foster building.
12. Paint desk at Plant 2 Control building.
Department 40 -Trunk Maintenance
1. Remove two depth recorders from the District 2 Cont, 2-14-1
and 2-14-3 trtmks.
2. Line clean District 11 Lake Avenue and Atlanta Sub trunks.
3. Line clean District 7, County Property.
4. Bolt down the manhole covers on cont. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5 and 2-9.
5. Station maintenance where needed.
Department 50 -Mechanical Maintenance
1. Scheduled maintenance, both Plants.
2. Continue repairs on No. 7 M.S.P.
3. Continue rebuilding No. 6 M.S.P. engine.
4. Repairs to No. 2 truckling filter at Plant No. 1.
Department 60 -Electrical Maintenance
1. Instr1D11ent damage repair.
2. Ellis controls.
3. Administration building tough plate lighting.
4. Outfall electric switch gear maintenance.
Department 80 -Laboratory
1. Industrial waste ammonia project.
2. Sediment collection.
3. Bacteriological completed test.
INSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
Plants
J-3-1
J-6-lG
Installation of Gas Engines
at Rothrock Outfall Booster
Station
Sheet Metal for Roofing at
Ocean Outfall Booster Station
J-7-3B Replace Air Conditioning
Administration and Engineering
Building
I-lR Rehabilitation of Ellis
Avenue Pump Station
PW-061 Installation of Gas Mixing
Compressors
PW-064A Plant Air Compressor
PW-066 -1 Modifications of Existing
Sludge Hopper Outlet Ports,
Plant No. 1
PW-068
. --.. -
PW-070
PW-072
New Ram Tables at Plant
No. 2
Interim Sewage Sludge
Facility Site Preparation
at Coyote Canyon
Warehouse Fire Sprinklers
Modifications to Existing
Launders at Secondary
Clarifiers at Plant No. 1
Laboratory Bench and Fume
Hood Addition, Plant No. 1
Apri l 16, 1979
Contracf signed by Pascal &
Ludwig.
Most of the sheet metal has been
installed on Foster. Working on
a contractor for roofing and
stucco.
yob should be complete in two
weeks.
Problems encountered installing
weir in Bushard line. Unable
to accomplish due to high flows .
Plans and specifications complete .
Bid date: May 1, 19 79 .
Compressor delivered 3/29/79.
Not all support equipment
delivered at this time.
Plans and specifications being
prepared. Tentative bid date:
May 1, 1979.
Plans and
Bid date:
Work under
specifications complete.
May 1, 1979 .
progress.-~~ /))/1
--~~~~~~--~
Contract awarded April 11, 1979.
Plans and specifications prepared.
Bid date: May 1, 1979.
Plans and specifications being
prepared.
~NSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT·
Plants (Continued)
Pl-17 Underdrain System for
Digester Cleaning Beds
at Plant No. 1
· P2-1R-2 Rehabilitation of Clarifiers
P2-23
P2-23-2
P2-23-3
P2-23-6
A, B, and C at Treatment
Plant No. 2
75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2
Oxygen Equipment
Electrical Reliability
Major Facilities
April 16, 1979
Plans and specifications complete.
Bid date: May 1, 1979.
specifications
Shop drawings being reviewed.
Equipment being delivered.
Engine generators tested. Con-
tractor working on punch list
items.
Plant Water Pum;e Station:
Contractor placing 36" plant
water feed. Slab at elevation
11.0 has been placed.
Primary/Effluent Pump Sta·tion:
Backfilling to elevation 5.50.
Pipe supports at elevation 7.0
for 72" discharge pipe are being
placed.
ESSPS and WSSPS: Beam at elevation
10.50 at south end of ESSPS has
been poured •..
·Aeration· Tanks·:
3% of walls have
Compressor Room:
12.0 is in place.
around building.
Approximately
been poured.
Slab at elevation
Backfilling
Waste Sludge Thicken·ers: Placing
perimeter forms for grade slab.
84-Inch Primary Effluent:
Continue backfilling over pipe.
84-Inch P.E. Distribution:
Approximately 70 1 of pipe
installed. Contractor to begin
backfilling and replacing concrete
slab. ·
Clari·fiers: Approximately 50%
of rebar for grade slab in place.
Rebar for east wall in place.
Approximately 25% of grade slab
concrete in place.
•
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT
Districts
2-SR-l
3-13-1
3 -20-3
3-20-4
Olive Sub-Trunk Repair
Westminster Interceptor
Facilities, Westminster
Avenue Force Main,
Second Unit
Knott Interceptor, Portion
of Reach 7
Knott Interceptor,
Reach 8
Santa Ana River Siphon
April 16, 1979
Low bidder was John A. Artukovich
and Sons, Inc., Azusa , California.
Work scheduled to begin in summer .
Line tests completed from Seal
Beach Boulevard to Bolsa Chica
Street. Work to start at inter-
section of Bolsa Chica Street
and Westminster Avenue this week .
Paving, median curbs and junction
structures at Orangethorpe
remaining to be completed.
Work on tunnel at Fullerton
Creek Channel suspended due to
high infiltration. 42-inch
R.C.P. under construction north
of Fullerton Creek Channel.
and specification approve
11, 1979. Tentative bid
May 8, 1979 .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0 . BOX 8127, FOUNTA I N VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 E LLI S AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEG O FREEWAY)
April 4, 1979
D R A F T
To: All Interes t ed Parties
Subj ect: Public Hearing for Bayside Trunk Draft EIR
Sanitation District No . 5 of Orange County has developed
a project r eport and a Dra ft Environmen tal Impact Repo rt
(EIR) for the replacement of a trunk sewe r in Bayside
Drive generally located between El Paseo Drive a nd Dahlia
Avenue. A public hearing will be held concerning t he
Draft EIR at Newport Beach City Hall Council Chambers on
at p .m.
The District 's sewer line now serving the area is badly
d eteriorated , and h as broken on several occasions. I t is
a 10-inch cast i ron pipe originally instal led in 1 936 .
The District is considering replac eme nt with a 24-inch
cast iron pipe to provide capacity for the existing and
master-planned deve lopme nt for Corona del Mar and the
I rvine Coast area .
Impacts that direc tly affect the adjacent residents wi ll
occur during the construction las ting approximate l y three
months n ext winter, such as increased tra ffic congestion,
nois e l eve ls and dust.
The project r e port and Draf t Environmental Impact Report
(EI R) can be exa mined at the following l ocations:
Orange County Sanitation Districts , 10844 E llis
Avenue, Fo unta in Valley
Newport Beach City Hall , Community Development Dept.,
3300 Newport Boulevard , Newport Beach
T ELEPH ONE S:
AR CA COD"E 714
540-2910
9 62 -2411
Newport Bea ch Library , 200 5 Dover Drive , Newport Beach
If anyone wish es addition a l informa tion or desires furth er
explanation , cal l De n ni s Reid , Senior Engin ee r, tel e phone :
540-2910 , extension 205.
Fred A . Harper
Genera l Manager
m&~------------------..
°\''' ., . '
\ _____ . ____ -:z ·:~ ----. . ----..
. --:.. .
r
BAYSIDE TRUNK SEWER
PR OP OSED FACI L I T IES
r-.,... --
~-~
.. A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS.
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92709
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLIO OFF'·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
April 4, 1979
DRAFT
To: All Interested Parties
Subject: .Public Hearing for Bayside Trunk Draft EIR
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County has developed
· a project report and a Draft Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the replacement of a trunk sewer in Bayside
Drive generally located between El Paseo Drive and Dahlia
Avenue. A public hearing will.be held concerning the
Draft EIR at Newport Beach City Hall Council Chambers on
at p.m.
The District's sewer line now serving the area is badly
deteriorated, and has broken on several occasions. It is
a 10-inch cast iron pipe originally installed in 1936.
The District is considering replacement with a 24-inch
cast iron pipe to provide capacity for the existing and
master-planned development for Corona del Mar and the
Irvine Coast area.
Impacts that directly affect the adjacent residents will
occur during the construction lasting approximately three
months next winter, such as increased traffic congestion,
noise levels and dust.
The project report and Draft Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) can be examined at the following locations:
Orange County Sanitation Districts, 10844 Ellis
Avenue, Fountain Valley
Newport Beach City Hall, Community Development Dept.,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
TELEPHONES:
AREA CDDE '71°4'
540•2910
962-2411
Newport Beach Library, 2005 Dover_ Drive, Newport Beach
If anyone wishes additional information or desires further
explanation, call Dennis Reid, Senior Engineer, telephone:
540-2910, extension 205.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
. r
[o;
0
0
....... .......... .... .. ... .. .
.... -..
-0 cc
:0 :x;:
o en
-0 -0 0 (./) ,.,.,
rrt
0 '-~ :=a ,, c:::
l> z (') ::s:: -r en --I r-r-1
iii :E .,, CJ) rr-i
::0 Cl , .
..u rn
~
~ L-,
I
1 01 ·1 ·~1 l"'I ~~ I ' I . .
/\ ,. . ·I . I I ~
I ' ; I · 1 JI I ~L J L _ I J
1 ~1 '~l 'rii l J t) I ~ ~ I ~ I (t I I ~
I . 4,v'7i~ .. ,,..-Q . '-. I ~ I z AH!Vf4 ._0RIV£ Jv € -~r ----. ---
J r ----------J ~ L__ ,
4voc.A oO AVENUF-"
~'-J C .. ·::~-'D c· 11 1·00 kf_ uJ\Jo L .:=J I ... I D --
ti
~Cl
'· c:i-~
I) " ~ ;) .
C)_ <.()
~ ........
'. <::) ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
A•".-A r;1A AV£Nl./e
/'ri~ r -. ~ ~ J ~"' . --p:f ---·-/ ~L ---~ ~ r·--, r --~
I' I• . 1t,L -..... '•· -. --·;: ---~L 11 I r1 ~t : ·;· .. ;~[·-· .. ·-,~; -·--i~l· ---,~[ ___ =i ,' "{ \)~ ~
(:) ~ I . I ______ . _I -· .. -___ __J ---__ -1 I
\ p;:.·r_,o.-.·1 A Avt:NUE _ .• 'I': I.\ () .... ~ ·~-•()-
() (!)
\ ~ · · · ···--1 [ ___ ...... 1 1 · · ---1 1··-~---'Jr --, 1 ~~~r---~~
--.. -~ ... -.. -. ' . ·--·· -1-. I L 1' I ---..---;/. 7 /( :.----.. I ---·-----·--· "-·· --. ,/ ----. . r------1· · ·· -·1 r---~ [ -/ , __ . u ·1 • ,.,,_ __ •
,.. 1 --... _ 1 ___ ~--' L _____ J l. _____ -__ , r.. -
-:..1 IJt ; 'j L -~-~.eJtv4 ,r~o:-.• . . ·--·--4 v~~ue:l· Of -.~/ 1
l --. ·-· _ .. _ . -L . I
,. · ----· ·· ·--I J l. I
1·.,· '?... ,I ;1>~: ··-· .. _J [ ____ , __ I l ---------·-/ '--.l
,, "'\) ( : ?\· Q .//,LIL./,,, "1VENUE I ... I , .. , ~ I ~: . . . I I . ·1 i l l ---. ·w ·--~) i
I ., ~. ' • ~--.... -~-. L -~-. .... t . _J _// :' . [ . _J I ~ . : §
1
..... -~ .. I r -·-· --··-·1
1
-· .. ·-, 1-/ · l ·1
L tt\_ -m ~ _______ .. L _. ____ _J L _ __I L~ // < . 11 '-"I Fc.RN LcA.r I " ,.:;i , £.•.-'/I . 1 --l --! ~-·--;-·-1 r---·-1 [-·----11) J~. . . !
_ _J L... -·' : ~L _____ L __ _J --____ _j , , L0 ,/ 1--... ··-·-·':• --~ ~ -.. ~ l . ~ . -1 r-[--·---~ ,/1
;.' r -. -. --ii'
-_: L ____ t.j ' J [._...,.. ___ L__ __ J -·----·---,~· --.. ·------.JI
::1-r; ot. oeNR. 00 A vE Nuc I
: _I i ~-_ ~~--1 ~ \-___ ~_-_] [-1 l~=~] --?i 0 ~<~-:~~J I ·:. -. : . l
. , ! · ·d t \ \ --.-._-·1 r-= ____ J r_ ~ -·»~:..·_ .11-· -~1 1 i \:' \ -,,,,,_,,.,_,.,,,,, ------,,, ,..,,,.
~ -" : '~ \ -) l _c,c II ' ',\ ': ! I ---II
:> I \I ' I >.I .\ ·, i· I
I ' ""-""-•t i,. f I l j
.)
I "
: t
I
·-
. '
STATE
~·
"'-.. .
""-. "T_ -----
AR£A LIM L
[m
0
0
--····-· ...... .. ....
-0 cc
:0 :xc 0 ,, en -O o
(J) ........
fT1
0 I-~
:=Cf
11 c:
)> "diSD'
~ ::ai::::
r en ---f ~
r;; ~ .,, (J) rr-1
::a -G>
' Al
I'll
VI
~ l_r
"'!]
I
. ~ C1 . » ' /9' v)
I) ~
~ ~-
~ ' '· <:::> ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
·~1 .l'i ' /~' 1-1i 1 '~/ /'>i'/ 1~1 J" '·i_ I . 1),1 11i l '~I I ~ I ~1 ~ ~
! 'II,/ I t I I II)
; : 1
1
! ; ! ! I ~ 1 ~ _J I ~ '· l . -"------·
'-
r
I
J
t ''t:-\~, LD c ---1 r 1 ·00
I ~LJuU\u D c~ c -1 o
' A .. A r" I A AV.CNUE. ,; J ~1 · -1 ~1 -· j--~1 --Jg r--1,-·--: , / () r
I ~
. I
. ~L -· . ---J _____ ~L_j l I I
I ·;~r ·-·· -·-l ~i -J~l·· --,~[-~ .:
l _ _ l_ _ J _ .. __ _ __ __J __ _ _ _J I .
p 1--r_,r),-.'IA AVENUE • • Y · ·· -1 l___ ~ 1 · · ·---1 r -·-~--[JI_, ~--}:.." .. ··-·· . -. . . I ' I I -----::?;/! ! ~# ~--
'1 ()~ ~
c:i ~
. ~
() ~ Ci--
I 11i":
( I
I
1
I --. i'' -,~ --·. • r-...:-=--==:..:=-
1
:-=-.--=--1· r·~ ---=1 1 --.' '·-· -(t ,~'.Y --~ · --~, , 1_ ___ =-__ I L _____ _ _ __ __ L____ __ r
1
-: 1 ·-· ...!-:."/l_-<:_JIV -d lT!°.''·' . ··-_4 V~"(UJL [Jf --~ I
. ' I l -···-. j L . L _ . I 1"' ~1 · -• • -• • -, [ I
': I {'1\ .. : ' --J I__ _ -' -I ! ------·· ' . / I..
,'.' i ~\J f i ~. I I 0/INI I A l i t ·V.€Nf.h."~ » ) , ' 1
I
. ~ . ' . :J .. ·-I I. --. . I ! . J l_ __ j , . . . I ~ . : ~I . ~ I r -• • • • : r · 1 r--. --I .. " : 11 1 I
L (l\_ Hi ---. L_ --___ J l -. l ·-----. / . I . '-'"I F£/dl-./Lt=/J~ I 1 -.. ~:?• £•.·1 N . ·, ;-l --! t -----;--1 c-·---, r·-· ·-----,,-.. )"" ,i1 ,. -. ..1
I ,. :ff __J ! 0 / .,
...J ·-• !"to. -I • \) -------···-·-• ......J I ' L • ,-•• --·-• I j:· ~I :•~, --1 [ [-··---~ 1 ' ~.' f ·-· -·,
... l.. ·---~·_I I L_______ _ __ J -·-· ---·---, . t _ ------Jr :i-Got .O c Ad ?.00 ./ r. /]VEA.'UE . . ~· l · 1 --. -, r----, l-· ·-11 ··: o?, .... ··11 .
.1 I . --~ \ -·--· -· _f L ___ _J . ·--.I ·l , --· --
· i : . <S~ \ 1 --·-i ~---···--1 r . --· · >~: II . -·-11
\; \ \ ,,,., ,;),.,,;;; -~ ---. L --. , , , ----,,, ,._,,,,
~ 1
• : ·~ I .I l .. ·---. II ) I ! I I [_ : : d • I . I ·--•• . , I ·: ' l I .
:> • \ • } I 'I ·~ I
I I ... ,
~
~ -t>-
c:) II>
.)
/
/
---5 TATC.
-
, __ r""·E-,e-'-.....___ __ _
~-
'-.... "'-._
' -"T --
AR£A LIM/I
March 28, 1979
MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
FROM: FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER
COUNTY S ANI TATION DISTRICTS
ol O RAN GE COUNTY . CALIF ORNIA
POBO X 6127
108 .l<l ELL IS A VENUE
FOJNTAIN VA L_EY CALIFORNIA 9 2706
(7 14 )5•!0-29 10
(7 14) 962-2411
RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PRO JECT
AUTHORITY (SAWPA) AGREEMENT
The Districts' staff has been holding discussions with
representatives of SAWPA concerning certain obli gat i ons due
the Districts. Our General Counsel has p repared a propose d
amendment to an existing agreement to defer payment of funds
totaling some $842,000 to June 30, 1980. SAWPA ag rees to pay
9% interest per annum on all deferred payments. The major
dollar amount is the estimated supplemental treatment c os t
(secondary treatment) at Plant No. 1, plus an a ggregate of
other plant improvements. This figure i s an es t i mate at this
time.
SAWPA is developing a reve nue bond fin ancing program to
complete the first phase of their construction in t he Chino
and Corona areas. They expect funding b y June, 1980 and there-
fore have as ked for this amendment.
The SAWPA Board has agreed to the proposed a mendment in
principle and the Districts' staff is r equesting that the
Executive Committee reconnnend approval of the amendment to
the Joint Boards.
TLW:.pj
~· 03/19/79
AMENDMENT NO. l
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this
__ day of-----'· 1979, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
. NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, respectively,
herein collectively referred to as 11 Sanitation Districts", and SANTA ANA
WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY, herein referred to as 11 SAWPA 11
•
WHEREAS, an agreement was made and entered into between Sanitation
Distr'icts and Chino Basin Municipal Water District on April 12, 1972,
to provide for the grant of wastewater treatment and disposal rights to
Chino Basin Municipal Water District in Sanitation Districts' facilities;
and
WHEREAS, said agreement was assigned by Chino Basin Municipal Water
District to SAWPA, effective November 13, 1974, with the consent of
Sanitation Districts; and
WHEREAS, the base agreement provides for SAWPA to pay to Sanitation
Districts,-upon construction of supplemental treatment plan facilities,
a supplemental treatment charge; and
WHEREAS, there is presently due and owing the sum of $734,000.00
from SAWPA to Sanitation Districts, as a supplemental treatment charge,
calculated in accordance with that formula set forth in Section 3 of the
base agreement; and
.WHEREAS, SAWPA is further obligated under the provisions of said
agreement to pay to Sanitation Districts an annual capital cost replacement
charge, calculated on a basis of an amount equal to three (3%) percent
of SAWPA's investment in the primary and supplemental trcatme:1t and d·isposal
rights as of each respective annual date of payment; and
WHEREAS, the annua 1 ca pi ta 1 cost r~p 1 a cement cha rgc <L.Je from SlHf-A
to Sanitation Districts on April 12, 1979 is $48,750.00, and the payment
due on April 12, 1980 is $70,770.00; and
WHEREAS, SAWPA has requested Sanitation Distri~ts to accept a
deferral of those payments until June 30, 1980, contingent up(m SA',./PA
paying interest on all monies due and owing.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the prenrises a.nd of the coven:rnts,
rights and obligations set forth herein~ the parties hereto aqree :1s
follows:
1. Sanitation Districts agree to defer the due date of i.he sup) 1 ::men ta 1
tr.~atment charge presently owing to Sanitation D·istrkts in the amcnnt of
$734,000.00 until June 30, 1980.
2. Sanitation Districts agree to defer the due date for· the cap·i·::a·i
cost replacement charge for the 1979 payment in the amount of $48~7::o.oo,
and the April, 1980 charge in the amount of $70) 770. 00, each and bc1i.11 ·:.o
June 30, 1980.
3. SAWPA agrees that it will pay ·interest at the rat2 of rdnE: (9~')
percent per annum to Sanitation Districts, calculated on the a:nount 3 oLing
and deferred hereunder, commencing as of the orig·inal du:; date set forth
in the base agreement.
4. The extension of the due date for the specified charq~s SC·~ forth
herein shall not be deemed a waiver·by Sanitation Districts of any oth~r
rights of Sanitation Districts, or duties and obl i~F·.tions of s;·JJPA~ ~c1 t
forth in the base agreement.
-2-
5. The parties reaffirm that each of the existing provisions set
forth in the base agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except
as expressly modified herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
No. 1 to Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, respectively
By
~---:c-ha-1-·rma~n-,__,,,,B-oa_r_d __ o~f~D~i-re-c~t-o-rs----------~~
By~--=-----~-=----...-...------,~~~~~---S e c re tar y, Board of Directors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By~~--..--..-.--.----...-~-=-~---:-~-...~ Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
By ______ ,__ __ ~------~--------~------~
-3-
,.
r
.. Executive Committee Item f/4 ·.
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
GANN SPENDING-LIMITATION INITIATIVE
~ Sec. 1 The Gann Initiative proposes to place a constitutional limit on the expenditures of state
and local government in California. The limit would be a variable limit, as opposed to a
fixed limit such as a specified annual percentage growth factor. The limit, or growth
factor mechanism, under the.initiative provides that the "total annual appropriations" of
any ·governmental unit may not exceeq the prior year's "appropriations limit" by more
than a percentage equal to the sum of the percentage changes in the U.S. Consumer
Price Index (not to exceed the percentage change in California per capita personal
income) and the population of the jurisdiction.
~·
Sec. S(h)_The "base year" for purposes of determining the first, ·and most important,
"appropriations limit" is 1978-79.
Sec.-2 Revenues received in excess of the appropriations limit must be returned by a revision
of tax rates or fee schedules within the subsequent two fiscal years.
Sec. 3 The Initiative provides for adjustments to the "appropriations limit" in the following·
ways:
a) Where the financial responsibility for a service is transferred from one
governmental unit to another, the new service provider shall experience an
increase in the "appropriations limW' and the unit transferring the
responsibility shall have its limit decreased by a like amount. The amount of
the change shall be mutually agreed upon. .
. b) Where the financial responsibility for a service is transferred to the private
sector or where· the financial source for a . service is transferred to
· regulatory licenses, user charges, or service fees; the a~propriations limit
shall be reduced accordingly •
. c) When there is an emergency, the appropriations limit may be exceeded
provided that the limits in the following three years are reduced to prevent
an aggregate increase in appropriations.
Sec. 4 The appropriations limit may also be changed by a majority vote of the people within
the affacted entity~ The _duration of such change, however, shall not exceed fou!" years.
Sec. 5 Governmentai entities may establish special purpose funds as necessary (e.g., reserves,
retirement, sinking fund). Deposits of revenues into said funds does fall within the
''appropriations limit." Withdrawals, expenditures, or transfers of these funds shall not,
for t~e purposes of this article, constitute appropriations .
. : Sec. 6 ''Whenever the Legislature or any state agency m·andates a new program or higher level
of service on any local government, the state shall provide a subvention of funds to
reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of
service, except that the Legislature may, but need not, provide such subvention of funds
for the following mandates: ·
(a)
(b) ,.
(c)
nLegislative mandates requested by the local agency affected;
"Legislation defining a new crime or changing an existing definition of a
. crime; or
"Legislative mandates enacted prior to January 1, 1975, or executive orders
or regulations initially implementing legislation enacted prior to January 1,
1975."
-10-:
•• ..., ........ 5 .................. LH .. J.'I;; .:>11 a .u Ut;; \,;Vll;)ll Ut;;U _., '"'t'Cl.ll lllt;; t1 U ll.I LY U l lilt;; ;)ltl.L t: fJ [" 0 1 any local government to meet its obligations with respect to e x isting or future bonded
indebtedness." ·
Sec. 8 Definitions:
a) " 'Appropriations subject to limitation' of t he sta te shall mean any
authorization to expend during a fiscal year t h e procee ds of t uxes levied by
or for the state, exclusive of stat e subventions fo r t he use a nd operatio n of
local government (other than subventions made purs u a n t to Se ct ion 6 of this
Article) and further exclusive of refunds of t a x e s , b e nefit pay ments from
retirement, unemployment insurance and disabili t y in s ura nce fu n ds ;"
b) " 'Appropriations subject to limitation' of an enti t y o f lo cal go vernment shall
mean any authorization to expend during a fisc a l ye ar th e p r oc eeds of t axes
levied by or for that entity and the proceeds of sta t e s ub venti ons to that
entity (other than subventions made pursuant to Se ct io n 6 of this Article)
exclusive of refunds of taxes;"
c) "Proceeds of taxes" defined.
d) "Local government" defined.
e) "Cost of living" shall mean CPI for U.S., not to exceed change in C~lifornia
per capita personal income.
f) "Population" defined. (For school districts it shall l;ie th e ADA.)
g) "Debt service" defined.
· h) " 'Appropriations limit' of each entity of government fo r fi s cal y e ar 197 8-79
shall be the total of the appropriations subject t o li m it at io n of s uch e n t ity
for that fiscal year. For fiscal year 1978-79, s t a te s u b v en t i ons to local
governments, exclusive of federal grants, sh a ll be d e e me d to ha ve been
derived from the proceeds of state taxes."
i) "Except as otherwise provided in Section 5, "ap propriations subject to
limitation" shall not include loca l agency lo an fu n ds or ind e b t edn ess f unds,
investment (or authorizations to invest) funds o f t he s t a t e , o r o f a n entity o f
local government in accounts at banks or savings a n d lo a n a sso ci a tions or in
liquid securities."
Sec. 9 Those expenditures excluded from the appropriations limit shall be:
a) Debt service.
b} Appropriations for court or federal mandates.
c) "Appropriations of any special district which e xis ted o n J anua ry 1, 197 8 , and
which did not as of the 1977-78 fisca l ye a r l e vy an a d va lor e m t ax on
property in excess of 12 ~ cents per Sl 00 o f a s s e sse d va l ue; or t h e
appropriations of any special di s trict then exis ti ng o r t herea f t e r c rea t e d b y
a vote of the people, which is tota lly fun d ed by o th e r t ha n t he p roc e e ds of
taxes."
Sec. 10 Initiative to take effect July 1, 1980.
Sec. 11 Severability Clause
-11-
. ··-..... -.... ·.-· ···--· -····----·-··-·····--.. --·--·--· -~ ...
r
-•• •• ~ 41,
COMPARISON OF PROVISIONS: GANN INITIATIVE ·AND ACA 2 (BO ATWR IGHT)
PROVISIONS
1. Scope of Limit
2. Growth Factor
3. Base Year
4. Adjustments
to Limits
5. Appropriations
Excluded From
Limits
,.
GANN INITIATIVE
"Total annual appropriations."
(Sec. I, 8h, 8e, 8f)
State and Local: U.S. Consumer
Price Index (CPI), but not to
exceed change in California per
capita income, plus population
change. For school districts,
population is measured by ADA.
(Sec. 8e, 8f)
Growth is from allowable, not
actual, appropriations in the
prior year. (Sec. 1)
State and Local: 1978-79
(Sec. 8h)
(a) Limit is increased and de-
creased by mutual agreement
when responsibli ty for providing
that service is transferred to
and from governments. (Sec.
3a)
'ACA 2 (BO ATWRIGHT)
"Annual appropriations."
State a nd Local: California Con-
sumer Price Index (CPI), but not
to exceed 10 %, plus population
change.
Growt h is fro m actual appropria-
tions o f the p rior year.
State an d Local: 1979-80
(a) Sa me
(b) Limit may be changed by (b) Sa me.
majority vote of the electorate
approving such additional appro-
priations. (Sec. 4)
(c) Limit may be exceeded for (c) Same .
"emergency". (Sec. 3c}
(d) Limit is decreased when an (d) No adjustment.
entity transfers service to a pri-
vate entity. (Sec. 3b)
(e} Limit is decreased according-(e) No adjustment.
Jy for a year when financial source
of providing a service is trans-
ferred to regulatory licenses,
user charges or user fees . (Sec. 3b)
State and Local:
--Bonded indebtedness payments
from all debt existing on Jan.
1, 1979; only voter-approved
debt thereafte r. (S ec. 7,
. 8g, 9a)
-Appropriations of federal reve-
nues (state and loca l).
(Sec. 8h}
-4-
State and Local :
--Bo n ded indeb t edne ss paym e nts
fro m all exis t ing debt; o nly
vote r -app r ove d debt af t er
date of e le ction .
-Appr opr ia t i on o f fed e ral reve-
nues (s t ate) a nd appropriation
of s t ate and f ederal revenues
(loca l).
·r
• ·-· PROVISIONS GANN INITIATIVE
7. Emergency
Appropriations
No special requirement to de-
clare an emergency. By the con-
trolling constitutional or sta tu-
tory voting requirements, the
Legislature or governing body
may spend in excess of the limit
in case of "emergency". How-
eyer, the limits in the next 3
years must be reduced in the
amount spent in excess of the
limit "to prevent an aggregate
increase in appropriations re-
sulting from the emergency."
(Sec. 3c}
No express limit on duration of
emergency.
8. State Reimburse-Applies to mandates enacted
9.
10.
11.
ment of State-after Jan. 1, 197 5; excludes
Mandated Local mandates which: define crimes,
Costs are requested by the local
agency affected. {Sec. 6)
Oisposi tion of
Revenues in
Excess of
Allowable
Appropriations
and Exclusions
Year Effective
Vote to Change
Limitation
,.
Must be returned by a revision
of tax rates or fee schedules
within the next two fiscal
years. (Sec. 2) -
Fiscal year following adoption
(1980-81 if voted June 198 0 ).
(Sec. 10)
Electors may change limit by
by majority vote for not more
than 4 years. (Sec. 4)
-6-
-·-··· ·-·-..... -..... _. ___ ,, ....... -... ---------··------·
ACA 2 (BOATWRIGHT)
Requi res a 2/3rds sepa rately
recorded vo t e o f the Legisla-
ture o r g overn i ng bod y ; emer-
gency a p pro priations do not
count in determining the next
year's limit.
Same.
Must be reflected in a correspond-
ing re duction in on e or more ta xes
collec ted in the next e nsuing tax
year.
1980-81 · fiscal year .
Elect ors m a y change limit by
majority vote.
-~··-----·-·---···----· ___ ,. __ -···-...
COUNTY SAN!TATION DISTRICTS
of OHANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10344 ELL15 AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71<) 54tl-2910
March 22, 1979 (714) 96:'-2411
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Members of the Executive Committee
FROM: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance
RE: Districts' Financial Plan and Revenue Program
In 1972 Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control M.t (PL <12-SOO)
which essentially requires a higher level of sewage treatr11cnt, cont re)] .s on
industrial discharges and specifies that agencies receiving grar.ts fo:· cnnstruc-
tion of facilities to comply with the law must adopt a user charge s:"~;·::en, i.e.,
Revenue Program, providing that user classes pay proport:iciJially to the.tr use of
the system as a class and that said users be cl[1ssificd :into re~~idcn~:j al/small
non-residential, industrial/large commercial or j nsti tutional/tcix ex<!L.pt groups.
Also required of an approvable Revenue Progrcim is assur~nce that tot a 1. rt~vem~cs
will be sufficient to properly operate and maintain the scJcragc systcM ;rnd
that adequate capital funds will be provided for future fCJcilitl0s n·p::.~icement.
The Revenue Program document is required to comply with Federal and ~;t ai c
regulations and guidelines and must be adopted by the governing bo~rc: of each
agency.
In 1977 the Act was amended, largely due to the efforts of oar Directors and
General Manager. The major impact of the amendments is to allow a<l \ .:i] 01·cm
taxes to satisfy user charge requirements for residential/ smJ.11 11011-r·:!~ j <:ential
users and a provision for waiver of full sccond;Jr)' treatment rcqnircn ent!-" for
ocean dischargers, provided certain conditions uro met.
Enclosed is a copy of the draft Financial Plan ancl Revenue Pro;:rr:1m (P:i.·cgi-am) for
the Districts which has been prepared by Pc~1t, ~brwj ck, Mitchell & Ccm_;.~ acy (P~!~f).
The Program must be submitted to the State \Vat(:r Resources Co-.1tr'.Jl Board (S\mCB)
and receive their approval before July 1, 1979. This date is 0·~1cial.t in that
Federal construction grant payments will be cut off after July ht if thi::
Program has not been approved. The tentative schedule is as :follows:
March 28
April 11
April 12
Consideration by Executive Committee
Consideration and tentative approv;! 1 by
the Joint Boards
Submittal to SWRCB
Although the final draft will not be submittc·cl 10 S\\'RCH unt j 1 tc11t:!U \i{: ~1:>proval
is given by the Directors, we have worked very closely h1 itli the ~;t;1te ~,t:tl~f jn
developing the Program and a preliminary dr:ift \•::1s revi.l'\·:cd h.ith ~Ir. >r·111~, Pctc;rs,
chief of the financial unit, on March 13th. Ill~ js s~1l.i;.;ficcl \dtl~ the l':o:~rlllll [1nd
has indicated that approval could be given \vith a minimum c;f acldit·ionaJ n~view.
.....
The major issues that must be addressed by the Boards arc:
(a) User charge method for residenti:1l/small non-residential group
in the event ad valorcm taxes become insufficient to cover
OM&R or arc cut off entirely by the State Legislature.
(b) Capital funding policies re:
(1) Connection fees
(2) Annexation fees
(3) Annual capital charges
(c) Notification requirements re residential/small non-residentlal
groups on the ad valorem method
(d) The ordinance implementing the Revenue Progra.m and other
provisions required by the Act
(e) Consolidation
User Charge Method. Because of the imposition of Proposition 13, we ate 1Jncertain
at this time as to how long the Districts' share of the 1% a<l vaJorem tnx levy
wi 11 cover OM&R costs for the residential/ small non-rcsidenti.al ~~roup. 'foercfore,
one of the policy determinations re.quired of the Board wi 11 he the met.h~)J of
funding this group's costs at such time as ad valorem revenues a:re insufficient
or are cut off entirely by legislative fiat. 'I11e alternate' methods are discussed
on the attached table which has been extracted from Section III of the: Revenue
Program.
The industrial/large commercial group will be charged on the basis of a:t~rnl
use and receive credit for ad valorem taxes paid in essentially the sa.n~ :nanner
that has been used since adoption of the industTinl Naste orcl:Lnance in 1970.
Therefore, this group will not be affected by the tax issue. The users' total
charge will remain the same. The only difference \wulcl be the a1:1ount co] lected
via the property tax bill and the amount billed directly by the Distr.i.cts.
It should be noted that the industrial/large commercial base for 1979-g.) will
consist of the firms cuTrently permitted under the existing indu:;trial '<faste
ordinance. Over the next few years the Districts must identify all oth,;r users
that discharge greater than 25, 000 gallons per cfay of cqui val ent dome;·,. Le waste
and transfer such users from the residentiaJ /sma) l 1wn-rcside:ntfr l gr•Jll) to the
industrial/ large commercial group. This wi 11 be rm extcnsi ve unc:ertab.~ tg and
necessitate the review of around 30,000 properties.
With the exception of a few large Federal and State instalJ at.ions, th::: ins ti tu-
tional/tax exempt group does not presently pay taxes to the U:i.st·ricts ane.l,
therefore, will not be affected by a change in the tax provis:on:~. This f!roup
will be billed separately by the Districts based on actuul use. It is our
interpretation of the law that local governmcnt;i l agencies arc exempt f .ro;n
user charges.
-2-
Capital Funding Policies. With the adoption of PL 92-500, the Districts
anticipated the need to construct advanced treatment facilities and have been
accumulating reserves to provide necessary capital for such construction. An
application for waiver under the amended provisions of the Act has been
submitted and we expect to receive the waiver. This will enable capital funds
accumulated for final stages of secondary treatment to be reappropriated for
other capital projects. These funds, combined with other reserves accumulated
pursuant to the Boards' long-range capital financing policies, are sufficient
to fully fund capital needs for the next five years, thus avoiding a general
capital levy against current users during that period. If, however, the
waiver request is denied, additional capital funds will be required.
The capital financial plan will be set forth in Section II. There are several
policy issues which must be addressed with regard to future capital financing;
specifically, connection fee determination, annexation fee calculation methods,
and annual capital charges. 1he recommendati0ns have not been finalized and,
the~efore, Section II of the Revenue Program is not yet completed. However,
this section, exclusive of the above items, is contained in the draft. Tile
consultant expects to complete work on these items prior to the Executive
Committee meeting and submit a separate analysis for review by the Committee.
'Ihe selected methods will then be incorporated into the Draft Financial Plan
and Revenue Program.
Notification. Prior to Jarvis-Gann, the Districts' ad valorem charge was
included as a separate line item on the tax bill. This procedure complied with
thd Federal requirement of notifying the users of the cost for wastewater
treatment services. Now the Districts' portion of the tax charge is included
in the total general levy and the cost of our service is, therefore, not
identifiable. A separate notice for residential/small non-residential users
will thus be necessary to satisfy this requirement. There are basically three
options which are (1) print a notification directly on the tax bill, (2) a
separate printed insert to be mailed with the tax bill and (3) a separate notice
to be mailed to all property owners. 1here are inherent problems with each.
Industrial and true-exempt users will not be affected as they will be billed
.separately by the Districts, thus satisfying this requirement.
Implementing Ordinance and Consolidation. The Boards must adopt an ordinance
implementing the Revenue Program and other prov1s1ons of the Act. TI1e staff
and General Counsel are in the process of drafting an amendment to the existing
ordinance to satisfy this requirement. The SWRCB has advised that the ordinance
need not be adopted prior to July 1st. Therefore, the Boards may wish to
consider the amendment concurrently with their review and determinatjon relative
to the proposed consolidation of Districts.
-3-
(
Billing Alternative
TABLE ( -1
ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR USER CHARGES WHEN
AV TAXES ARE INSUFFICIENT·TO PAY OM&R COSTS
Probable Calculation Method
(
Other Major Relevant Issues
1. Separate charge as a
special assessment on
the property tax bill.
1. Subdivide user classes into sub-
classes such as single family and
multi-family dwellings, office
buildings, small commercial estab-
lishments, etc., and calculate flat
rates attendant to each based on
average discharges and system loading
from representative samplings. ·
1. (a) Current Statutory authority exists
2. Separate charge collec·ted. 2. Base charge on water volume
on water purve~or's utility
billing.
(b) Requires a public hearing and separate
notice of said hearing to all property
owners.
(c) Utilizes existing assessor file as data
base and tax bill as billing mechanism.
However, data base would require.sub-
stantial annual update at Districts'
expense and conversion to a computer
tape input by Districts to assess
charge on tax bill.
(d) Inaccuracy of Assessor's data base may
result in high percent of billing
errors and require a customer service
function.
(e) Unsewered properties could be reflected
in rate structure once identified and/
or separate provisions made for rebate.
(f) Maximum charge for tax collector's
service is established at $S/account or
1% of collections, whichever is greatet
(g) Low delinquency factor.
(h) Cash flow is not spread evenly.
(i) Would satisfy notification requirements
2. (a) Current statutory authority exists.
However, it is permissive, not mandat-
ory for the water utility.
(b) Would not require a public hearing.
(c) Would require contractual arrangements·
and system modifications with approx-
imately 150 water purveyors.
(Continued)
('
Billing Alternative
2. (Cont'd.)
3. Direct billing by CSDOC
(
TABLE III-1 (Cont'd)
Probable Calculation Method
3. Same as 1. above utilizing
assessor's files as the data
base source.
(
Other Major Relevant Issues
(d) Would require a minimum of data base
maintenance by the Districts as this
would be automatically done by the
water utility. However, separate
arrangements may have to be made with
the utility to reflect loadings of
small commercial establishments.
(e) Charge more directly associated with
actual use (assuming use is related
to water consumption).
(f) Unsewered properties would have to be
identified and a system exception or
rebate provision made.
(g) High delinquency.
(h) Cost of service by utility is unknown
and would have to be negotiated or
established by code amendments.
(i) Cash flow \.;ould be more uniform.
(j) Would satisfy notification require-
ments.
3. (a) Current statutory authority exists.
(b) Would require installation of exp~n
sive computerized billing system and
associated personnel and administra-
tive costs or contractine with ~n
out.sidP, hurerm.
(c) :·lost costly method.
(d) Requir1.?s extensive data hnse me?1n-
Jl1aintemmce.
(e) Inaccuracy of data base source may
result in high percent of billing
errors.
(Continued)
..... ..... ....
I
-....J
(
Billing Alternative
3. (Cont'd.)
4. Impose a Separate
AV Tax Levy
( (
TABLE III-1 (Cont'd)
Probable Calculation Method Other Major Relevant Issues
4. Based on property value
(f) Unsewered properties could be reflected
in rate structure once identified and/
or separate provision.made for rebate.
(g) Expected delinquency factor would be
highest.
(h) Cash flow impact would be based on
determination of billing frequency.
(i) Would satisfy notification requirements.
4. (a) Requires 2/3 voter approval
(b) Unsewered property issue would have to
be resolved
(c) Low delinquency factor
(d) Most cost effective method
(e) Cash flow not spread evenly
(f) Would satisfy notification requirements
(g) Least equitable
4-11-79
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
WELCOME NEW DIRECTORS AND ACKNOWLEDGE FORMER DIRECTORS
WHO HAVE BEEN REAPPOINTED TO THE BOARDS,
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.~
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25TH,
INVITE Iml. OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN
THE DISCUSSIONS:
FRANCIS GLOCKNER
BETH GRAHAM
THE COMMITTEE WILL BE CONSIDERING THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS
APRIL 25TH RELATIVE TO THE REMAINING STEPS TO COMPLETE THE EPA
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) TO ADD THE NEEDED CAPACITY TO
THE TREATMENT PLANTS. THE STAFF AND THE DISTRICTS' EIS CONSULTANT
WILL BE MEETING WITH SAN FRANCISCO EPA PERSONNEL NEXT WEDNESDAY~
APRIL 18TH.
MEETING DATE April 11, 1979 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS_ 1,2,3,5,6,7&11
DISTRICT 1
~IELSH)J • • • • • • ·SH/\RP i~i· • • • ·-----(.Afiii.....,.;,... 1ruG&IDOtQ ev.o.m; .w'A'-1) .__ __ __
RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··---__
·CRANK) : •••• HUTCHISON ---__
DISTRICT 2
~FRIED) •••••• • -WEDAA· • • • •• ·-----
RASHFORDL •••• HOLT·· ••••• ·--___ _
AHTHONY J •••••• CLARK· ••••• ·------
(GAMB INAL ••••• FOX ••••••••• ------
WELLS) ~·.r ... , ... HOUSTQ~ ••••• ------
E'iJl\HS) ~.AIU> ... , SRTl 7.·J'A,f\tfaJSJ'.Q__ ----
CUL VER) •••••• , PERRY •• • ••• •------
GRAHAM) ........ ROGET •••••• -----
SEYMOUR) ... •••• ROTH •••••• ·-------
HOYT J ••••• • • • • SM ITH •••••• ·--___ _ > ADLER) ••••• ··.STANTON •••• ·--___ _
WINTERS) •• ••• -VELASQUEZ •• ·--__ --
DJSTRJCT 3
) ADLER .• •••• • • .SVALSTAD. • • ·----__
PERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·----__
CORBETT)., •••• GRAHAM ••••• .__ ___ _
LACAYO) ••••• ,.HUDSON ....... ____ _
/
SEITZ). ........ LASZLO •• · •••• _____ _
GAMB I NA) •••••• LE-BARON •.••• __ __ __
FINLAVt8f ····OLSON·~··\.\: ___ _
EWdfS) ••• l\b .. , 9RTIZ.·J~~\"l'lb'to __ .
~NYBORG) ••.•••• PRIEST ••••• ._ ___ _
GRIFFIN) •••••• REESE ••••••• _____ _
SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH •••••••• _____ _
PATTINS1N) •••• SIEBERT •••• ·--___ _
f
ZOMMICK ..... ,. SYLVIA •••••• _____ _
WHEELER ~ ••••• WE.I SHAUPT ••• ___ . __ _
"ANTHONY •·• .. ~·.WIEDER ....... _____ _
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····--___ _
DISTRICT 5
~liUMMEL) • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·-----. -
ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·······------
RYCl<OFF). ·····STRAUSS·····------
DISTRICT 6
( RYC KOFF) •••••• MC INN is ... ·------
( R l LEY) ••.•••••• ANTHONY· • • • ·--___ _
(CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON···--___ _
DISTRICT _l
HOYT-:--) ••••••• Sl•1ITH ••••••• ____ _
WAHNER ·······GLOCKNER •••• _____ _
(/\~THOt.J.~). ••• • -CLAfi~J;~ ·-__ ( e"'TJ z )ll\lt,~)f\Ol<\-E¥M+S • ·--__ --~ \~E LSH) • ·······SALTARELLI··--___ _
GAIDO) • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· · ·--___ _
RYCKOFF). ·····WILLIAMS····-----.-
DISTRICT 11
-MAC ALLISTER)·P/'.TTJNSON·. ---'---~ATTINSQN)· ···BAILEY·····~ ----
/\NTllONY) ••• • • • W.I EDER· • • • • ·--__ __
4/11/79
JOINT BOARDS
~RI LEY)· • ·······ANTHONY· • • • ----
PATTI NSQN). •••• BAILEY ..... ·----
ANTHONY) ••••••• CLARK •••••. ----
GAMB I NA).······ FOX···· • · • · __ --
~PERRY)" ......... CULVER ••• :.. ----
ORT I z) .11\J'fU\1001.0. EVAN& .WJ\~l) __ --
GAMB I NA) • • • • • • • LE BARON • • • ----· -
{WAHNER) •••••••• GLOCKNER ••• __ --
CORBETT)· • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ----
GR I FF IN)·.····· ·REESE······ ---·-
RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT ••••••• ___ _
WELLS). •••••••• HOUSTON •••• _· __ _
LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON ••••• ___ _
CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCH I SON •• ___ _
SE nz). ........ LASZLO ••••• ___ _
RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ___ _
WHEELER)······· WE I SHAUPT • ·----
FI NLAYSQN). •••• OLSON v .. · ·I\ · ----
E'OcNS) Waltb ... ORTIZ: lftNl fr)&lO __
MAC ALl-1 STER) •• PATT I NSON •• ___ _
CUL VER). ••••••• PERRY •••••• ___ _
NYBORG) •••••••• PRIEST ••••• ___ _
ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••• ,. ___ _
GRAHAM) •••••••• ROGET ....... __ --
SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• __ --
HUMMEt-L ••••••• RYCKOFF ..•• ___ _
h'ELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI·--__
~IELSH) ••••••••• SHARP •••••• ----
PATTINSON) ••••• SIEBERT.·.·--__
HOYT)····· •• ••• SMITH.·· • • • ___ _
~ADLER) ••••••••• STANTON •••• ___ _
RYCKOf F) · · •• • • • STRAUSS. • • • ___ _
ADLER)·· •••• ••• SVALSTAD •• ·--__
!
ZOMMI CK).··.··· SYLVIA.·. •• ___ _
GA IDO) • • •••••• • VAR DO ULI S •• ___ _
WINTERS) ••••••• VELASQUEZ •• ___ _
FR I ED)· • • • • • • • • WED AA. • • • • • ___ _
ANTHONY).······ WIEDER.····--__
(RYCKOFFJ ••••••• WILLIAMS •• ·--__
(VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS ••• ·• ___ _
OTHERS
HARPER •.• -• --
SYLVESTER •. __
LEWIS ••••.• --
CLARKE ••••• _~
BROWN •••••• __
WOODRUFF ••• __
HOHENER ••.. __
HOWARD ••••• __
HUNT ••••••• __
l~EITH .••••• __
KENl!EY ••••• __
LYNCH .••••• __ _
MADDOX ••••• __
MART W SON •• __
Pl EHSALL ••• __
STEVEr·:s ••.• --
TRAVEHS •••• __
,/ . .
J
RESOLUTIO NS AND SUPPO RTI NG DOCU MENTS
APRIL 11~ 1979 -7:30 P.M.
-• ;:. ·~ JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
\.,,.,145046
45047
45048
45049
45050
45051
45052
45053
45054
45055
45056
45057
45058
45059
45060
45061
45062
45063
415064
45065
45066
45067
45068
45069
45070
' _,45071
..... 45072
45073
45074
45075
45076
45077
45078
45079
45080
45081
45082
45083
45084
45085.
45086
45087
45088
; ; 45089
45090
45091
45092
45093
45094
45095.
-...._/45096
·. 45097
45098
II A-1"
Advertising Unlimited, Building Signs $
Air California, Air Fare
Airborne Freight Corp., Freight
All Seals, Inc., Engine Parts
Allied Colloids, Chemicals
American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts.
K. ,Ando, Computer Program re Lab Variance Analysis
Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies
Aurora Pump Co., Pump Parts
Automated Deburring Supply, Truck Parts
Hilary Baker, Employee Mileage
Ball Industries, Janitorial Supplies
Bank·of America, Bond Processing
Beckman Instruments, Lab Supplies
Bel-Art Products, Lab Supplies
Bierly & Associates~ Inc., Workers' Comp. Administration
Bishop Graphies, Drafting Supplies
Black & D~cker Mfg. Co., Truck Repair
W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage
C & R Reconditioning Co., Bearing Repairs
CS Company, Freight
Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co;, Safety Supplies
Calgon Corp., Chemicals
California State University, Publication
Carman Tool & Abrasives, Small Hardware
Carmenita Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Truck Parts
Chemical Engineering, Publication
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Motor Oil
Brian Chuchua's Jeep, Inc., Truck Parts
Cla-Val Co., Engine Parts
College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber
Connecticut General, Group Insurance Premium
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Small Tools
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
Control Specialists, Inc., Controls
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County Sanitation Dist •. of Orange County, Workers' .Comp •. Fund
T.H. Creears Corp., Pump Parts
Charles P. Crowley Co., Engine Parts
Deco., Electrical Supplies ·
George DeMatteo, Employee Mileage
Diamond. Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supply
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Electro Test, Inc., Ground Resistor Testing
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Esterline Angus, Lab Supplies
Fillmore & Garber, Inc., Small Tools
Filter Supply Co., Engine Parts
Fisher Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Flo-Systems, Pump Parts
AGENDA-ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
55.11
74.00
79.57
103.69
424.00
400.70
777.56
50.00
1,028.38
243.53
92.96
15.00
24.17
1,133.99
13.72
53.21
900.00
48.01
18.08
33.78
140.00
17.88
96.49
704.90
26.50
16.51
405.71
30.00
3,564.36
45.90
15.98
127.52
297.60
51.43
8,009.63
152.69
329.45
6.00
.. 1,015.95
2,268.35
175.59
175.62
33.30
76.00
221. 73
307.54
200.00
3,000.00
102.29
106.95
218.74
193.98
173.51
"A-1"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 19i9
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS .
45099
45100
45101
45102
45103
45104
45105.
45106
45107
45108
45109
451}.0
45111
45112
45113
45114
45115
45116
45117
45118
45119
45120
45121
45122
45123
45124
45125
·45126
45127
45128
45129
45130
45131
45132
45133
45134
45135
45136
45137
45138
45139
45140
45141
45142
45143
45144
45145
45146
45147
45148
45149
4.5150
Foothill Feed Co., Truck Parts
City of Fountain Valley, Water
France Compressor Products, Engine Parts
G.W. Maintenance, Inc., Truck Repairs
General Conveyor, Inc., Turbine Building Repair
General Electric Co., Controls
General Telephone Co., Telephone
Gierlich Mitchell, Inc., Electrical Supplies
Goldcnwcst Fertilizer Co., Sludge Hauling
Gould, Inc.-Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Supply
M.E. Gray Co., Lubricant
Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc. Electrical Pump
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Leases
David A. Hodgson, Employee Mileage
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co., Chemicals
Howard Supply Co., Steel Stock
Hunter Woodworks, Inc., Pallets
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental
Huntington Supply, Small Hardware
International Harvester Co., Truck P~rts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Jefferson Associates, Deferred Compensation Transfer
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supply
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valve Supplies
Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Truck Parts
King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supply
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools
L.A. Chemicals, Chemicals
L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing
Lighting Distributors, Inc., Electrical Supplies
A.J. Lynch Co., Janitorial Supplies
Mahl Steel & Bolt Co., Steel Stock
Charles Meriam Co., Electrical Supplies
Moore Products Co., Electrical Repair
Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals
National Lumber Supply, Lumber
Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies
City of Newport Beach, Water
North West Motor Welding, Inc., Engine Parts
Orange Coast llardwood & Lumber, Lumber
Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Electrical Supplies
Pacific Telephone Co., Signal Circuits
Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts
M.C. Patten Corp., Glass Tubing
Pettibone Corp., Equipment Repairs -
Pickwick Paper Products, Paper Products
City of Placentia, Manhole Repair
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
161.60
563.62
197.33
25.50
555.00
16.43
498.57
98.99
7 J 751.25
201.56
51.68
9.47
662.81
819.23
12.00
329.98
2,139.59
1,253.83
691.12
737.80
33.32
147.98
196.81
3.20
75.00
172.87
91.15
561.94
411.25
130.09
58.30
183.40
1,186.62
20.99
412.13
203.20
379.98
395.26
418·. 00
2,742.43
612.89
205.47
43.05
349.80
165.36
285.83
46.91
1,083.80
108.25
959.51
329.00
480.00
''A '>" -'-
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
45151
'...._,; 45152
45153
45154
45155
45156
45157•
'4515·8.
45159
45160
45161
45162
45163
45164
45165
45166
45167
45168
45169
45170
45171
45172
45173
. 45174
45175
. 45176
'-"''45177
45178
45179
45180
45181
45182
45183
45184
45185
45186
45187
45188'
45189
45190
45191
45192
45193
,· / 45194
"A-3"
Postmaster, Postage
Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice
Printec Corp., Paper Supplies .
Productool, Inc., Small Tools
Quality Building Supply, Cement Supply
Radio·Shack 113124, Sound Level Meter
The Register, Classified Advertising
. :·· s·~ a·. C., Inc., Paving
Sand Dollar Business Forms, Office Supplies
Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts
Santa· Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Repair·
Sirgent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Seal Engineering Co., Rubber Products
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Small Tools
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies .
Sidu. Mfg. Co., Pipe Supply
Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power
Southern Calif. Water Co., Water
Southern Regional Safety Seminar, Seminar Registration
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Sterling Power Systems, Inc., Motor Parts
The Suppliers, Small Tools
J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash
T.f.I. Building Materials,·Pipe Supply
Taylor-Dunn, Electric Motor
Tileville, Tile ·
Travel Buffs, Air Fare
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
United Industrial Supply, Inc., Electrical Supplies
United Parcel Service, Delivery
United Sta~es Equipment, Inc., Compressor P~rts
U.S. Government, Publication
Utilities Supply Co., Small Tools
Valley Cities Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Vehicle Spring Service, Truck Parts
Victor Comptometer Corp., Calculator Repair
John R. Waples, Odor Consulting
Waukesha Engine Servi center, Engine . Parts ..
Western Salt Co., Salt Supply
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Milton D. Winston, Employee Mileage
Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services
Ev·erett H. York Co., Hose
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
500.00
18.00
34.00
151.42
589.36
42.'35
. 381.95
1,966.11
338.14
82.20
170.00
5.72
168.22
104.94
183.87
963.57
46,565.66
6.51
120.00
280.07
226.56
175.08
349.87
1,279.84
577.70
80.51
132.00
929.37
104.82
32.51
205.06
50.00
58.72
2,139.24
534.58
258.52
612.41
213.00
570.64
136.35
378.21
31.98
4,809.39
159.00
$ 123,866.16
"A-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 197~
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUNO WARRANTS
45030
45031
45032
45033
45034
45035
45036.
45037
45038
45039
45040
45041
45042
45043
45044
45045
II A-4"
Associated of Los Angeles, Testing Equipment
Buticr Engineering, Inc., Contract P2-23 Administration
California Electric Services, Inc., Paint Shaker
Compressor Service Co., Contract E-092
Drew Carriage Co., Lawn Mower
Dunlap Appliance Co., Inc., Operations Center Appliances
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
Envirotech, Belt Press Rental re LA/OMA Solids Study
Equinox-Malibu, Contract J-4-2
C.11. Leavell & Co., Contract P2-23-3
Menke Marking Devices, Chalkhoar<ls
The Register, Leg3l Advertising PW-070
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Moisture Ba.lance
H.C. Smith Construction Co., Contract P2-23-6
Triad Mechanical, Inc., Contract I-lR
Utilities Supply Co., Power Equipment
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
l
AMOUNT
$ 180.96 .v 10,872.00
417.31
87 I 710. 80
395.33
803.48
279.78
1,590.00
20,087.10
23,471.65
291.41
282.00
511. 98
885,533.40
30,733.12
118.46
$ 1,063,278.78
$ 1,187,144.94
II A-1~ II
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 13, 1979 . .
""'-' WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
·ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
45024
45025
Christeve Corp., Contract 2-19
The Register, Legal Advertising 2-SR-l
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND .
WARRANT NO •.
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
45026
45027
Colich & Sons, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-13-1
Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND
~ IYARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
,· ;'
45028 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contract 3-20-4
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 5
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
45029 K.P. Lindstrom & Associates, EIR Bayside
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5
"B" .AGENDA ITEM #8·-ALL DfSTRICTS . . . .. .
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AMOUNT
159,047.01
282.00
159,329.01
AMOUNT
468,568.80
117,616.94
586,185.74
AMOUNT
14,671.72
14,671.72
600,857.46
AMOUNT
3,473.91
3,473.91
"B II
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 27, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
45257
45258
45259
45260
45261
45262
45263
45264
45265
45266
45267
45268
45269
45270
45271
45272
45273
45274
45275
45276
45277
45278
45279
45280
45281
45282
45283
45284
45285
45286
45287
45288
45289
45290
45291
45292
. 45293
45294
45295
45296
45297
45298
45299
45300
45301
45302
45303
45304
45305
45306
"C-1"
A-1 Acoustics, Tile_
All Seals, Inc., Gaskets
Almquist Tool & Equipment, Small Tools
Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Publications
VOID
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Truck Parts
Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies
Bank Amcricard, Travel Expenses
Banning Battery Co., Batteries
Berkley Controls, Iilc., Electrical Supplies
Bierly & Associates, Inc., Self Insurance Program
Bird Machine, Inc., Engine Parts
Blair-Martin Co., Inc., Pump Ports
Blue Diamond Materials} Concrete Mix
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts
W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage
C.W.P.C.A., Publications
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline
College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber
Control Specialists, Inc., Controls
Mr. Crane, Cr~ne Rental
D.M.E., Inc., Engine Parts
Data Printer Corp., Office Supplies
Decker Instrument Supply Co., Engine Parts
Deco, Electrical Supplies
Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies .
Electric Machinery Mfg. Co., Electrical Supplies
Fischer & Porter Co., Plumbing Supplies
Fisher Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Flo-Systems, Pump Parts
Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware
Clifford A. Forkert, Engineering Services
France Compressor Products, Compressor Parts
City of Fullerton, Water
General Electric Co., Electrical Repairs
General Telephone Co., Telephone
Georgia-Pacific, Lumber
Gould, lnc.-Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Supply
George T. Hall Co., Pun~ Parts
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tire Repair
Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts
Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co., Chemicals
House of Batteries, Batteries
Howard Supply Co., Valve Repair
Hundley Co., Inc., Controls
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supplies
Kclco Sales~ Engineering Co., Compressor Parts
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
228.70
151.77
145.75
99. 4.0 .. oo
378.61
1,220.16
278.26
257.81
210.79
900.00
3,709.25
246.89
218.98
94.00
. 39.90
21.20
3,288.47
174.69
1,072.12
598.50
58.49
245.51
171.00
7.96
610.31
71.39
312.84
324.02
51.52
1,548.66
100.49
667.00
440.44
15.06
1,772.93
3,922.98
711. 91
35.27
208.89
165.00
102.99
391.84
1,668.47
85.44
191. 97
471. 71
10.29
614.12
101. 35
ur 1" '"'-
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 27, 1979·
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
"-45307
45308
45309
45310
45311
45312 .
45313
45314
45315
45316
4531~
45318·
45319
45320
45321
45322
45323
45324
45325
45326
45327
45328
·45329
45330
·5331
"-(5332
45333
45334
45335
45336
45337
45338
45339
45340
45341
45342
.45343
45344
45345
45346
45347
45348
.·: 45349
45350
45351
45352
45353
45354
45355
·~356
~
"C-2" .
King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Wire Supply
L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies
LFE Environmental Labs, Lab Analysis
Lewco Electric Co., Truck Repair
Lighting Distributors, Inc., Light Bulbs
McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Small Tools
N. Martin, Air Breaker Repair
Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprint Reproduction
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equipment
Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Publication
Moore Products Co., Electrical Supplies
Motorola, Inc., Communications Contract
Nalco Chemical Co., Freight
National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware
National Picture Frames, Inc., Office Supplies
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Gaskets
City of Newport Beach, Water
OCB Reprographics, Inc., Index Maps
Orange Coast College Book Store, Publications
Pacific Telephone Co., Signal Circuit~
M.C. Patten Corp., Gauges
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Reddi Rooter, Knott Interceptor Repairs
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Metal Supplies
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor
Sargent ·Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies .
City of Seal Beach, Water
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Small ToQls
Shepherd Machinery Co., Truck Repair
South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies
Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power ·
Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Bottled Water
Sterling Power Systems, Inc., Engine Parts
Superintendant of Documents, Publications
The Suppliers, Safety Supplies
. J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash
TFI Building Materials, Plumbing Supplies
Travel Buffs, Air Fare
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline
United Industrial Supply, Inc., Pipe Supplies
United Parcel Service, Delivery Service
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
VBA Cryogenics, Special Gases
Valley Cities Supply Co., Plumbing Supplies
AGENDA ITEM.#8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
945.45
36.31
318.53
10.00
67.67
5.40
1,313.14
103.12
1,412.25
214.83
237.12
35.80
268.03
379.33
37.60
267.31
97.94
13.19
5.00
14.74
48.02
260.93
. 438. 73
549.66
18.00
107.10
24.00
191.15
166.85
855.75
9.01
95.14
5,704.07
60.12
14,406.22
4,070.71
209.96
29.74
15.00
111. 51
166.01
1,291.53
847.00
201.98
11. 74
96.46
17.34
356.38
463.61
409. 71
"C-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 27, 1.979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
45357
45358
45359
45360
45361
45362
"C-3"
Valve & Primer Corp., Valves
Valve Services, Inc., Engine Parts
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Guy ~. Warden & Sons, Plumbing Supplies
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corp., Xerox Reproduction
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 163.32
130.85
·s20. os
77.36
3,927.84
1,937.23
$72, 187. 97
"C-3"
I •
.·
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 27, 1979.
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
45251
~5252
45253
45254
45255
45259
,. ,·
"C-LJ II
Ball Industries, Vacuum
Butier Engineering, Inc., P2-24 Value Eng.
Compressor Service eo., Contract E-092
Equinox-Malibu, Contract J-4-2 ·
Saturn Mfg. Corp., Accounting Dept. Partitions
Valley Cities Supply, Vise
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
431. 42
3,600.00
5,641.20
4,672.80
949.00
437.80
$15,732.22
$87,920.19
"C-4"
WARRANT NO.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 27, 1979
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
45245 Fulop, Rolston, Burns & McKittrick, S.B.E. Refund re Annex _ff35$
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND
DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
ACCUMULATED C:\ P ITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
45246
45247
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad, 2-19 Inspection
County of Orange, Lab Analysis 2-19
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
45248 Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-13-1 and 3-20-3
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND
DISTRICT NO. 3
WARRANT NO.
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
45249
45250
"~"
Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-20-4
Smith Emery Co., Testing 3-20-4
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FR FUND
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
.·
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AMOUNT
525.00
525.00
AMOUNT
306.55
778.35
1,084.90
1,609.90
AMOUNT
4,318.00
4,318.00
AMOUNT
4,977.00
l,7~7.50
6,744.50
11,062.50
"D"
v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO • __ N_/_A ________ _
C.O. N0. ____ 1 __ ~~----~~--~--
CONTRACTOR: EQUINOX-MAL!BU DATE March 29, 1979
~----------------------------------~~------~~~~~~~~-----
JOB: CHLORINATION FACILITY REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. ,J-4-2
Amount of this Change Order {ADD) (RiRU£f) $ _fil!fi. 115 ______ _
. In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in t~e contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
. additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated November 29, 1978
and December 12, 1978. District's letter 1
dated December 1, 1978.
ADD:
1.
2.
~·
DEDUCT:
1.
. ...
Removal, refabrication, and painting of existing
handrail at facility. Total add this item
Commercial blast, prime coat, and· paint all existing
8" post-chlorination pipe within the Chlorination
Facility. Total add for this item
Total Add:
Contractor was allowed to keep existing equipment
in service during refurbishing period. Total
credit for this item
Total Deduct:
TOTAL ADD
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time
A. For delays in procurement of parts
B. For inclement weather •
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS
$411.45
517.50
$9213.95
$242~50
$242.50
$686.45
42 Calendar Days
13 Calendar Days
55 Calendar Days
"E-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ____ N_/A ____________ _
\.,,,,J C.O. N0. _____ 1 ______________ ___
CONTRACTOR: ______ E_QU_I_N_o_x_-MAL ___ I_BU~---------------DATE _________ Mar ___ c_h __ 2_9_,_1_9_7_9 ____ __
JOB: CHLORINATION FACILITY REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-4-2 .
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
. Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date: April 11, 1979
EQUINOX-MALIBU
By _______________________ ~~--~--
C on tractor
September 28, 1978
120 Calendar Days
January 25, 1979
SS.calendar Days
SS Calendar Days
175 Calendar Days
March 21, 1979
•••
. •.
Or_lg_lnal ~ontract Price $_1_3_7_,_so_o_._o_o ___ _
Pr~v. Auth. Changes $ _____ o_.o_o ____ _
This Cha.nge (ADD) (IJ~PJHR) $ ___ 6_a_6_.4_s __ _
Amended Contract Price $ 138,186.45
Approved:
.COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Ora_nge County, Ca 1 i f orn i a
By------------------~---~~~---C hie f Engineer
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-39
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-4-2 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TllE BOARDS or D !RECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-4-2 AS COMPLETE AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREE~ffiNT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
·1 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, equinox-malibu, has completed the work in
.accordance with the terms of the contract for CHLORINATION FACILITIES REFURBISHMENT
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-4-2, on March 21, 1979; ·~nd,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
'-.,,/ filed; and,
Section 3. That Job No. J-4-2 is hereby accepted as comple1:e in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 28, 1978; and, .
Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with equinox-malibu setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Chlorination Facilities ncfurbishment
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-4-2, is hereby approved; and,
· Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
,·:
County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute
· said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Coilllscl.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
· "F" AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "F"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. __ N~/A...._ ____________ ~
_;..,,)
C.O. NO. 1 --------------------------...... _
CONTRACTOR: ____ T_R_IA_D __ ME __ C_HA __ N_ICA~L~, __ I_N_C_. ________ ~ ·oATE ________ M_a_r_c_h __ 29 __ ,_1_9_7_9 __________ _
JOB: REHABILITATION OF ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, JOB NO. I-lR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ 15,.119.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADD: -I
1. Re~ocate power panel from station entry way to above
grade due to insufficient space. Electrical panel
found to be too large to construct as shown on Plans
2. Miscellaneous modifications of structural steel piping
and equipment due to variation of existing equipment
TOTAL ADD
Extension of Contract Time
The contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract
time for the above mentioned items of 20 calendar days
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
. Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
April 27, 1978
250 Calendar Days
January 1, 1979
20 calendar Days
20 Calendar Days
270 Calendar Days
January 21, 1979
$11,619.00
3,500.00
$15,119.00
Original Contract Price $ 371,.173.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo
This Change (ADD) (~) $ 15,119.00
Amended Contract Price $ 386,292.00
Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 Approved:
·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange Co~nty, California
TRIAD MECHANICAL, INC.
•By ______________________________ _ By ____________________________ ___
Contractor Chief Engineer
AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G"
. ;
"H-1"
BID TABUL/\TIONS
Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks
Specification A-096
III. Two 9-Yard
Dump Trucks
Trans-West Ford $35,616.00
Fontana
Theodore Robins 36,131.16
Ford, Costa Mesa
Carmenita Ford 36,381.51
Santa Fe Springs
McCoy Ford No-Bid
Anaheim
Goodwin Dodge No-Bid
Fullerton
Bob Johnson GMC
Long Beach
Peck Road Ford
Whittier
International
Harvester, Anaheim
Fairway Ford
Placen:tia
35,6Jt5.68
36,237.80
38'101(. 77
No-Bid'
III-A Alternate
Bid
No.:..Bid
No-Bid
"
"
"
* 34,472.40
"
i~ 36 ,937. 25
No-Bid
* Do hot meet specifications.which called for chrome piston
rod on the hoist mechanism. Alternate bids do not include
chrome rod. The chrome rod was specified to prevent rust and
pitting that inturn would cause earlier replacement of rod and
interim replacement of seals .
AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL.DISTRICTS "H-1"
,·
March 30, 1979
022
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
J. Wayne Sylvester
Ted Hoffman
Vehicle Bids: Specification Numbers
A-096 and A-097
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANG~ COUNTY, CALl~ORNIA,
P. 0. BOX 5175
1084• ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
(714) 540-2910 v
(71•) 962-2411
Sealed bids were opened on March 27, 1979, for furnishing three
(3) pickups and two (2) 9-yard dump trucks.
The tabulation of bids received is attached.
•,
It is recommended on Item II (one pickup) that the bids received
from Theodore Robins Ford,. and Fairway Ford be rejected for not
meeting District specifications. It is also recommended that the
alternate bids for the two dump trucks (Item III-A) be rejected
for not meeting District specifications.
It i·s further recommended that the awards of Items I, II, and
III be made to the low bidders meeting specifications: Item I and
II to Bob Johnson GMC for an amount of $15,98q,8o and Item III to
Trans-West Ford for $35,616.00. All figures include sales tax.
Sufficient funds have been budgeted for the pickups. The .budgeted
amount for the dump trucks is $29,680. The cost of these trucks
has increased 20% from last years purchase. The additional amount
of $5,936 needed to complete this purchase can be transferred from
the amount budgeted for a one-ton cab & chassis. This unit will not
be purchased this fiscal year.
It should be noted that on the bid received from Trans-West Ford,
low bidder on Item III, listed the following exception: any
possible new mandated equipment imposed by the federal government
after submi sion of bid, that results in an additional cost to
~ •to c any, would be added to bid price at time of delivery.
& Property
W.N. ~larke, Sdperintendent
Attachment (bid tabulation)
TH/yh
~'H-2" AGENDA ITEM· #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
i :'
II I II
BID TABULATIONS
Three (3) Conventional Type Pickup Trucks
Specification A-097
Bob Johnson GMC
Long Beach
Theodore Robins
Ford, Costa Mesa
Carmenita Ford
Santa Fe Springs
McCoy Ford
Anaheim
Goodwin Dodge·
Fullerton
Trans-West Ford
Fontana
Peck Road Ford
Whittier
International
Harvester, Anaheim
Fairway Ford
. Placentia
: ... · ..
I. Two Pickups
6 Cylinder
Manual Trans.
$10 '205 ;68·
10,74!1.16
11,173.00
· No-Bid
11,270.21~
No-Bid
No-Bid
No-Bid·
10,489.~0
II. One Plckup
8 Cylinder
Auto. Trans.
~~ 5,686.90
5,901.66
5,836.38
5,9~2.31
No-Bid
No-Bid
No-Bid
*Do not meet specifications. Both dealers bid 6-cylinder engines,
specifications called for V-8 engines
AGENDA ITEM ~9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II
II J"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-42
AWARDING JOB NO. PW-070
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE
AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Tile Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards
of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to
R & E INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC. for FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING
WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070, and the bid tabulation and proposal
submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-070 be awarded to R & E
Industrial Fire Protection, Inc. in the total amount of $19,749.00, in accordance
with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,·
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work
pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and~
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
AGENDA ITEM, #(J) -ALL DISTRICTS II J"
CONTRACT NO. PW-070
Ap ri 1 3 I 19 7 9
11:00 A.M.
PROJECT TITLE: Fire Sprinkler System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1
\_,I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $19,000.00
CONTRACTOR
ADVANCE FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC.
LA HABRA
'l'OTAL
$18,400.00
Contractor submitted bid on February 27, 1979. Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were
issued March 23 and March 27 respectively. Contractor failed to acknowledge
receipt of Addenda in his bid proposal. On contacting th·~ compar:y, the
Contractor stated they had sent a certified letter on Friday, March 30,
1979, requesting their bid be negated because their license did not enable
them to do the work required in Addendum No. 2.
1. R & E INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.
VENTURA
2. B & L AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY
PALMDALE
3. ORVIN ENGINEERING CORPORATION
LA HABRA
4. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
SANTA FE SPRINGS
5. VIKING FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY
ANAHEIM
· 6. D & B FIRE PROTECTION
RIVERSIDE
7. HERZIG CORPORATION
POMONA
$19,749.00
$23,780.00
$25,428.00
$26,100.00
$26,142.00
$27,000.00
$34,400.00
I hereby reconunend award to the lowest, responsible bidder, R & E Industrial Fire
Protection, Inc. of Ventura for $19,749.00.
c&::'.'.::'.1:c_j
Chief t.'ngineer
I concur with the above recommendation:
~~ t /) \ ' . .
.-. -d 0 , 7 Vt t a LL_ __
li?dA:Harper, General Man~ger
"K" AGENDA ITEM #9(0)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "K"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-40
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20
(POSITIONS AND SALARIES)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
RESOLUTION NO. 79-20
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Exhibit "B". of Resolution No. 79-20 is hereby amended to add
position classification thereto, as set forth below:
EXHIBIT "B-1" .
ADMINISTRATIVE/CLERICAL POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS
Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly
Approximate
Monthly
Equivalent
Salary
10350 Buyer 1053B 7.45/9.27 1291/1607
Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, be further
amended to delete the following position classification therefrom.
EXHIBIT "B-2"
SUPERVISORY POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS
Approximate
Monthly
~quivalent
Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary
10200 Purchasing Supervisor 1057B 9.27/11.54 1607/2000
Section s. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that
conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and,
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9.CP) -ALL DI$TRICT~ "L-1" .. -
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective April 12, 1979.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -ALL.DISTRICTS "L-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-41
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20
(POSITIONS AND SALARIES)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * •.
. .
-~
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as .amended, is her~by
further amended to adjust salary ranges for position classifications therein, as
set forth below:
EXHIBIT "B-5"
OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS
Approximate \.,,'
Monthly
Equivalent
Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary
60230 Lead Instrumentation Technician 1054A 7.81/9.73 1354/1687
60375 Instrumentation Technician II · 10530 7.55/9.40 1309/1629
Section 2. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that
conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and,
Section 5. That this resolution shall become effective March 9, 1979.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
"M" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q) -ALL DISTRICTS
.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-43
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF EASEMENT Dff DS TO .
CITY OF COSTA MESA RE CONSl'RucTfO~'TcfV-TiYLAi'Jh--:\VF~~-iJF ·5-;ViY1{~1
DRAIN
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 or ORANGE COU;\TY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEM-
PORARY CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT EASEMENT DEEDS TO THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA RE CONSTRUCTION OF HYLAND AVEi\UE STORM
DRAIN
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 an<l 6 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETE~~INE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain temporary construction Easement Deed and
permanent Easement Deed, both dated April 11, 1979, from County Sanitat.i.on District
No. 1; and the certain temporary construction Easement Deed and permanent Easement
Deed, both dated April 11, 1979, from County Sanitation District No. 6, arc hereby
granted to the City of Costa Mesa in order for the city to construct the Hyland
\.,I Avenue Storm Drain located in the vicinity north of Sunflower Avenue and west of
Harbor Boulevard; and,
Section· 2 .. That the real property over whi.ch said easements are granted is
more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Easement Deeds are hereby granted for no fee; and,
Section 4. That the Chairmen and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 6 be authorized and directed to execute
the respective Easement Deeds on behalf of their District; and,
Section 5. That Resolution No. 78-120-6, authorizing easement per;nit to the
City of Costa Mesa for construction of storm drain, adopted by the Boar<l of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 on June 14, 197~, is hereby rescinded and made
of no further effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
"N" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICTS 1 & 6 "N"
"O"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-44-2
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-1
A RESOLUTION OF nIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT
NO. 2-SR-l
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section. 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board
of Directors by Lowry and Associ~tes, District's engineers, and concurred in by
the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to John A. Artukovich Sons,
Inc. for OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2~SR-l, the tabulation of bids and
the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered fil~d; and,
Section 2. That award of contract to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the
total amount of $189.970.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the
prices contained therein, be approved; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract
documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -DISTRICT 2. ''O"
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N.
~-----~~~~~~~~-
S lJ E E T
CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l
March 27, 1979
11:00 A.N.
\..,I PROJECT T~TLE __ ~o_L_1_v_E_s_u_a_-_T_RU_N_K_~_1m_~_Ph_I_R __ ~~----~~--~-~~~----~-
PROJECT DESCRIP~ION Construction of gravity sewer pipe and appurtena.r_1c_e_s __
in stre.et right of way and easement within OCFCD right-of-way, Santa Ann Ri vcr
ENGINEER'S ESTIMA'rE $ 173,ooo.oo
CONTRACTOR
1. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
Azusa~ California
2. Monarch Construction·
Orange, California
,.
BUDGET·AMOUNT $ -------
TOTAL·
$189,970.00
$225,005.00
I have reviewed the two bids submitted for the Olive Sub-Trunk Repair
and have found the low bid, submitted by John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
to be the lowest and most responsible bid .. It is, therefore, recom-
mended that award be made to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the low
bid amount of $189,970.00.
I concur with the above recommendation:
·Fred A. Harper, General Manager
"P" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) DIS°TRICT 2 "P"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0·. __ 9 _IA ________ \._.j
C.O. N0. ____ 1 _______________ __
CONTRACTOR: CHRISTEVE CORPORATION DATE ________ Mar ___ c_h __ 2_6_, __ 1_9_79 ________ __
RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19 and
JOB: ___________ o_R=C~H-A-RP....__C_I<E.-...L-L~O~G~G~>~s~u_a_-T_R_u_N~K...--..~C~O~NwT~BA::&.&.:::C~T~N~0~._2~-~2~0=---------------------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~ $ 5,914.96
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the.following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated March 8, 1979.
ADD:.
CONTRACT NO. 2-20
1. 8" PVC irrigation system not shpwn on the PlanEi
was encountered at Station 11+50. For remodel
and replacement
CONTRACT NO. 2-19
2.
3.
Excessively large water line thrust block found
at Station 25+10. Necessitated the relocation
of the Contractor's tunnel pit.
At Station 28+25, a 36" gas main was found to be
incorrectly shown on the Plans which required
modification of the pipe alignment resulting
in additional costs.
TOTAL ADD
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
contract time
A.
B.
c.
"Q-1"
For completion of the above mentioned items
For inclement weather
For delays in procurement of pipe
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
AGENDA ITEM #9(w) -DISTRICT 2
$1,134.83
$ 684.66
$4,095.47
$5,914.96
4 ·calendar Days
31 calendar Days
40 calendar Days
75 Calendar Days
''Q-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO . ___ N/_A_
C.·O. NO. l
CHRISTEVE CORPORATION DATE March 26, 1979
...
~
CONTRACTOR: ~--~------~--~~--------------~-~~--------~~~~---------RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19 and
JOB: ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20 ____________ ;..;._;;;..__ __ ~~.;._~.;_~;.._;,;.._~..:,._;;:..;;...:;~~~~:;.._~..:_-------------~--------~--
--
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
. \.
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
O~iginal Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension ·
·Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date: April 11, 1979
.: · ... ,.,
CHRISTEVE CORPORATION
Contractor'
June 29, 1~78
200 Calendar Days
January 14, 1979
75 Calendar Days
75 Calendar Days
275 Calendar Days
March 30, 1979
O~lginal Contract Price $
Prev. Auth. Changes $
Th is Cha_nge (ADD) ~~m~~) $
Amended Contract Price $
Approved:
734,210.00
0.00
5,914.96
740,124.96
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By -
Chief Engineer
"Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) -DISTRICT 2 "Q-2" .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. N/A --------------------~ C. O. No._· __ 2 _______ .\wJ_·. _
. -. CONTRACTOR : . CHRISTEVE CORPORATION . ----~---~~~~~------~---------RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO •. 2-19 and
DATE ________ M_ar __ c_h __ 2_9~,_1_9_7_9 ________ _
JOB: ____________ ~OR=C~H-A-RP~-<=KE=L=L=O=G~G~)-=-SU~B~-~T~R=U~NK~,~C=O~NT--.;;RA~C~T:.....:.N~0~ • ....;;;.2-~2~0~-----------------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ 12 ,415. 50
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions .from the contract price are h~reby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: (Contract No. 2-19)
Item
No. Unit Description
6 L.F. 54" casing
7 L.F. 27" V.C.P.
DEDUCT: (Contract No. 2-19)
5 L.F. 27" V.C.P.
13 EACH Sewer Supports
ADD: (Contract No. 2-20)
4 . V.F. 60" Manhole
Change Est'd Quantities
From To Diff.
30.
30
29
29
@ 400/L.F.
@ 142/L.F.
153
10
71
124
6
Total Add:
29 @ 99/L.F.
4 @ 200/EACH
Total Deduct:
CONTRACT NO. 2-19 -TOTAL ADD
72.l 1.1 @ 335/V.F.
CONTRACT NO. 2-20 -TOTAL ADD
TOTAL ADD THIS CHANGE ORDER
$ll,600.00
4,118.00
$15,718.00
$ 2,871.00
800.0j~
. $ 3,671.00
$12,047.00
$ 368.50
$ 368.50
$12,415.50
Original Contract Price $ 734,210.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 5,914.96
This Change (ADD) ~IRiM!f) $ 12,415.50
Amended Contract Price· $ 752,540.46
Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 Approved:
CHRISTEVE CORPORATION
•By ______________________________ _
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ______________________________ _
Chief Engineer
"R" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) -DISTRICT 2 "R"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-~5-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 or ORANGE COUNTY, CALif-ORNIA,
ACCEPTING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20 AS C:OMPLETE AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Se~tion 1. That the contractor, Christeve Corporation, has completed the
work in accordance with the terms of the contract for RICHFIELD SUB-TRU~K, CONTRACT
NO. 2-19, AND ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, on ~-larch 30, 1979; and,
Section 2. That by· letter, Lowry and Associates, District's engineers, has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has con~urred in said
engineer's recominendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Contracts Nos. 2-19 and 2-20 are hereby accepted as complete
in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated June 29, 1978; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute
a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
. Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Christevc Corporation
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Richfield Sub-Trunk Contract
:· No. 2-19, and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District,
in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
"S"· AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -DISTRICT 2 II S"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO ·--:-/_A ________ .V
C.O. NO. ______________________ _
CONTRACTOR: KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE DATE March 29, 1979
---------------------------------
JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3
------~----~~~~~----~----~~~-------------------------=------------------------
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (BRBHgt) $ 20,699.50
In accordance with contract provisions, the fo11owing changes in the contrqct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the.fo11owing
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADD:
1. Due· to the age of the ·existing pavement along Knott Avenue,
the detouring of the traffic, resnlting in concentrated
loads, caused excessive pavement damage beyond the contract
limits as specified. This condition created a ·changed
condition and it is the responsibility of the District to·
correct pavement deficiencies. Contractor was instructed
to remove and replace asphalt pavement in various areas
with variable thickness.
2.
Total add this item
Contract requirements include placement of a one inch
asphalt overlay along Knott Avenue from curb to curb. Due
to the varying condition of the road surface, additional
pavement removals were required to place an additional
~" overlay over most of the affected area.
Total add this item
TOTAL ADD
Extension of Contract Time
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract
time for the above mentioned items
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION
•
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(z) -DISTRICT 3
$10,937.50
$ 9,762.00
$20,699.50
10 Calendar Days
10 Calendar Days
"T-1"
u
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. Nin
C.O. N0. __ ~5~~---~----~---~-
CONTRACTOR: __ ~K~O~RD~I~C~K~&;_;;,.RADO;;..:;.;;;..~S~,~A.;;.,_,-.J~O~I~NT.._V~E=N~T~U~RE=---~-DATE March 29, 1979
JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
.Original Contract Time
·Original Completion Date
Time Extension this Change Order
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
'
Board authorization date: April 11, 1979
KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE
Contractor
December 29, 1977
365 Calendar Days
December 28, 1978
10 Calendar Days
18 Calendar Days
383 C~lendar Days
January 15, 1979
' I
Or.iginal Contract Price $~~,113.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 10,249.94
This Cha.nge (ADD) ~£U:Z-:i<) $ 20,669.50
Amended Contract Price $ 3, 911t032. 44
Approved:
.COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ------Chief Engineer
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(z) -D1STRICT 3 "T-2"·
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o.· BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. N/A
C. 0. NO._· ==6=================--\w)-
CONtRACTOR: KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE DATE ________ Ma_r_c_h __ 2_9_, __ 19_7_9 ________ __
·JOB: KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3
Amount of this Change Order (~ (DEDUCT) $ 7,637.50
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
DEDUCT:
Item Change Est'd Quantities
No. Unit
2 L.F.
10 L.F.
15 V.F.
17 V.F.
ADD:
7 L.r.
8 L.F.
12 L.F.
13 L.F.
18 L.F.
Descri;etion
43" R.C.P.
8" V.C.P.
84" Manhole
48" Manhole
78" Casing
42" R.C.P.
30" Casing
8" V.C.P.
House Laterals
From
347
1,402
162
152
184
184
90
152
150
To
332
1,215
140
143
199
199
90.5
152.5
290
Diff.
15 @ 350/L.F.
187 @ 40/L.F.
22 @ 360/V.F.
9 @ 200/V.F.
Total De(\uct:
15 @ 500/L.F:.
15 @ 200/L.F.
0.5 @.175/L.F.
0.5 @ 50/L.F.
140 @ 30/L.F.
Total Add:
TOTAL DEDUCT
$ 5,250.00
7,480.00
7,920.00
1,800.00
($22,450. 00)
$ 7,500.0~
3,000.00
87.50
25.00
4,200.00
$14,812.50
($ 7,637.50)
Original Contract Price $ 3,880,113.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 30,919.44
This Change (~~3) (DEDUCT) $ (7,637.50)
Amended Contract Price $ 3,903,394.94
Board authorization date: April 11, 1979 App.roved:
KORDICK & RADOS, A JOINT VENTURE
•By ______________________________ __
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ______________________________ __
Chief Engineer
"U" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) -DISTRICT 3 ."U"
-• -"! •
'...)
·~
"V"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-46
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-21
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF .nm BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICA-
TIONS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of
Orang~ County, California,
DO ~EREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by L. D. King, Inc., Districts'
engineers, for construction of SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. 5-21, are
hereby approved and adopted; and,
... Section 2. That the Secretary· be authorized and directed to advertise for
·bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
·and time at ~'1hich said bids wi 11 be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' engineers
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 11, 1979.
'·
AGErmA ITEM #9(BB) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "V" .
"W"
·~~~~
FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC.
1451 WEST LAMBERT ROAD
LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA 90631
STATE LICENSE
# 259936
(2 1 3) 6 9 1 ·O 9 1 8 (7 t 4) S 2 6 • 2 2 3 1
March 31, 1979
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation District No. 1
·of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
REF: JOB P.W.-070
Gentlemen:
The revised scope of the referenced project, as modified by
Addenda No. 2 would require that ADVANCE FIRE PROTECTION CO.,
INC. entertain sub-contract bids for that portion of the work
which is in the public street, since our C-16 Contractor's
License does not entitle us to do public (dedicated) water
mains.
We have been unable and unwilling to do this in the short
time allowed, and therefore respectfully decline to bid on
the referenced project.
Please disreguard all previous correspondence.
Very truly yours,
ADVANCE FIRE PROTECTION CO., INC.
~C:~aL;,k
Paul E. Straight. ~
PES/pm
AGENDA ITEM #9(0) -ALL DISTRICTS "W"
--.
v·
/
MEETING DATE __ A_p_ri_· i_1_1 _, _1_9_79_ T 1 ME_~ P • M. D 1 5 TR 1CT 5 _1_,_2_, 3_,_s_., 6_,_1_&_1 _1 __
DISTRICT l
/ ~IELSH)J ·······SHARP i~i· • •• ·--__ _
HtiH'"f-1-iiM i;NO&fOOtQ E\':O.N G Y>IAM) .--1!::::_ ----
R J LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··7-__ _
·CRANK) : •••• HUTCHISON --__ _
DISTRICT 2
~FRIED) •••••••• WEDAA. • ~¥. ·+ ----
RASHFORJ)) ••••• HOLT •••• CJP:. ·--___ _
ANTHONY) ,, ••••• Gl:AR"I(" • • ••••• __L_ ---
GAMB INA) •••••• FOX ••••••••• ___..:!_ ----
WELLS) .... 1 ••• , •• HOUSTQ~ •••• __ .1_ ----
E'tY\HS) tJ.All> •• "9RT I 7.·1A,E\tn.df~ ----
CUL VER) •••••• , PERRY •• • ••• •----7------
GRAHAM) ••••••• ROGET •••••• -----
SEYMOUR). • • • • • ROTH ••••••• --+ ----
HOYT) •• ••••••• SMITH.······------
ADLER) •••• • • • .STANTON •••• ·~ ----
WINTERS) •• ••• -VELASQUEZ •• ·------
DJSTRJCT 3 . · r..-t j
(ADLER) •••••• • .SVALSTAD. ~---___ _
). I ~ PERRY •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·--___ _
CORBETT) • , •••• GRAliAM ••••• .__:!._ __ __
LACAYO) ••••••• HUDSON ••••• .--1!::_ ___ _
[
SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO •• · ••• ·--7-___ _
GAMB I NA) •••••• l:E-BARON •.••• _____ _
FlNLAVt8~). ···OLSON·~·~· • ../ ___ _
EVANS) ••• l\I> ..• 9RTIZ.·J~~ :ot;.~ ____ .
i NYBORG) ••••••• PfH eS'f-.. ___ _
GR I FF IN). ••••• REESE ••••••• _L_ __ __
SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH •••••••• _L __ __
(PATTINSON) •••• SIEBERT ••••• ~ ___ _
~ZOMMICK~ ..... ,. SYLVIA ••••• ·-"-___ _
\~HEELER ~ ••••• WEISHAUPT. • • " _. __ _
"ANTHONY • .• • 11 ··NJ el>ER-:-..... \I ___ _
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS· •• • ._.1 ____ _
DISTRICT 5
~1-fUMMEd • • • • • • :ftVCKOFF'· • • • • __ ./ ---. -
ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·•·····~ ----
RYCl<OFF). • • • • ·~· • • • .__L ----
DISTRICT 6
{ RYCKOFF) •••••• Me INN i S-••• -~ ___ _
(RI LEY) ••••••• -ANTHONY·····-"-___ _
(CRANK) •••••••• HUTCHISON··.__:!_ ___ _
DISTRICT 7
lHOYT).) ••••••• SMITH .•••••• __:!._ ___ _
ntAHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• _.J_ __ __
( ANTHOtJ~) • • • • • ·CLARK.·_' .6 .... ·-"' ---( eRT J Z~ll\9'"~0lt\ EV1dfSW~~ ·-1J::_ ___ _
~ \~ELSH) • • • • • • • • SALTARELLI· °'._:L ___ _
GAIDO)········VARDOULIS··· ~ --;;r ----RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·.W-l a:+:AMS • • • ·-----.-
DJ STR JCT 11
IT-AC ALLJSTER)·PATTINSO.N·. _A-·---
/\ TTI N SQN) • • • ·BA I LEY· • •• • .___if_ ----NTJ JONY) •••••• \·~-•••• ._£_ ___ _
4/11/79
JOINT BOARDS
~RI LEY)· • • • • • • • ·ANTHONY· • • • _v_· __
PATTJNSQN) ••••• BAILEY .•••• _v_ --
ANTHONY) ••••••• CLARK •••••• __:::_ --
(GAMBINA) ••••••• fOX··· ·• • •• _v __ _
~PERRY)" •••••••• CULVER .•• ~ ._i.1 __ _
8 RTI iC) ·I ~Jf\IUOO"'tO. EVMI & • WJ\ ~~ _v..._ --
GAMB I NA)· • • • • • • L..£-&MOl't· • • _:L_ --
(WAHNER) •••••••• GLOCKNER ••• _v __ _
CORBETT)······· GRAHAM···· ._v__ -. -
GRIFFIN)·.······ REESE······ _v_ --
RASHFORDL ••••• HOLT. •••••• __L_ __
WELLS). •••••••• ~OUSTON •••• _· _.,., __ _
LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON ••••• ~ __
CRANK). •••••••• HUTCH I SON •• _ ... __ _
SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO ••••• _{ ... __ _
RYCKOFF) •••••• -~-H~N+S:. -~ __
WHEELER)······· WE I SHAUPT • ·~ --
FI NLAYSQNL •••• OLSONv .. • • • • __::!__ --E'w'ANS)W~ltb .... ORTIZ:1JtM\J\Jr)tlO <~ __
MAC All-I STER).. PATTINSON •• --2::.. __
CULVER). ••••••• PERRY •••••• _·./-__
NYBORG) •••••••• P-R-1-ESl ••••• _v __ _
ANTHONY). •••••• RI LEY •••••• _v1 __ _
GRAHAM) •••••••. ROGET.• ••••• _..;_· __
SEYMOU~) ••••••. ROTH ••••• ··-"'-. --
HUMMEt,.) •••••••. RV"CKOf'r:. • •• _.J_ --
WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI._,/ __ _
\·JELSH) ••••••••• SHARP •••••• ___:L_ --
PATTINSON) ••••• 61 EBERT.···-~·-__
HOYT)·.···· •• •• SM ITH.·· • •• _-. __ _
~ADLER)· • • • • • • • • ST ANTON· • • • _. __ _
RYCKOfF) ••••••• STRAUSS •••• ~ __
ADLER)········· SVALSTAD .• ·-"'-__
!
ZOMMICK). ······SYLVIA.····-\-__
GAIDO). • • • •••• • VARDOULIS •• _:~ __ _
\~INTERS).······ VELASQUEZ •• _ .. _. __
FRI ED).········ WEDAA. • • • • .. _\ __ _
ANTHONY) ••••••• WIEDER ••••• ~ __
(RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLI AMS ••• _c.. __ _
(VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS ••• ·._ .. __ _
OTHERS
\:.!'-·'' .. ~
(7...,..-L.::
(1 ( .~ .. : I 1
r
(Iv' ·'
I ,._f •
./ HARPER •••• ·--
SYLVESTER •• _L_
LEWIS •••••• __
CLARKE •••• ·-~
BROWN •••••• _v_
\1WODRUFF ••• ~
HOHENER •••• __
HOWARD ••••• __
HUNT ••••••• __
KEITH .••.• -~
KENNEY ••••• __
LYNCH •••.•• _k:'.:_
MADDOX ••••• __
MARTlf·iSON. ·--
PIERSALL ••• __
STEVENS •••• __
TRAVERS •••• __
MEETING DATE April 11, 1979 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS l,2,3,5,6,7&11
DISTRICT 1
WELSH)~······ ·SHARP·······------f.Aoe~;r-t .. ,~~t.f1\0~EVAt4S WIH\D. ·----__
RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY ••••• ---__
· CRANK) : •••• HUTCH I SON ---__
DISTRICT 2
~FR I ED) •••••••• WEDAA • • • • • • ·------
RASHFORP). •••• HOLT. • • • • • • ·------
ANTHONY) -••••• CLARK· • • • • • ·------
GAMB INA) .••••• FOX ••••••••• ------
WELLS) .......... HOU STAN ••••• ------
EVAHS) W,,t' bt ... ~l'~'BflQ_ ----
CULVER) ........ PERRY .• ·• ••• •------
GRAHAM) ••••••• ROGET ••••••• ------
SEYMOUR). • • • • • ROTH • • • • • • • ------
HOYT J •• ·······SMITH·······----__
ADLER) ••••• •• .STANTON ••• ··--___ _
WINTERS) ••• •• .VELASQUEZ.··------
DJ STRICT 3
(ADLER).· •••• •• .SVALSTAD • • • ·--___ _
(PERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·--___ _
( CORBETT) • ~ •••• GRAHAM ••••• ._ ___ _
(LACAYO). H ..... HUDSON .•••• ·------
[
SEITZ) •••••••• LASZLO •••••• _____ _
GAMBI NA) •••••• LE., BARON ...... _____ _
FINLAYSON) .. ··OLSON".·····--___ _
EVAUS)~~.1\l>. "0RTIZJ~~(I'.!.__ ____ .
~ NYBORGL •.•••• PR I EST •••••• _____ _
GRIFFIN). •.••• REESE. •••••• _____ _
SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH •••••••• _____ _
(PATTINSON) •••• SI EBERL •••• _____ _
~ZOMMICK~ ..... _...SYLVIA ••••• ~--___ _
\~HEELER ~ ••••• WE.I SHAUPT ••• _____ _
'ANTHONY ···.~ •• WIEDER •••••• _____ _
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·.···--___ _
DISTRICT 5
~liUMMEL)::: • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------
ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ·------
RYC l<OF f). ·····STRAUSS·····------
DISTRICT 6
{RYCKOFF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• _____ _
(RI LEY) ••••••• -ANTHONY·····--___ _
(CRANK) •••••••• HUTCH I S~N • • ·--___ _
DISTRICT 7
lHOYT).) ••••••• SMITH ••••••• ____ _
(\-;AHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• _____ _
(ANTHON~)_. • • • • ·CLARI<· • • • • • ·--___ _
(eRTJ z)VtAUMOtQ EWcUsWlllb. ·------
0'-:ELSH) • ·······SALTARELLI·~--___ _
( GAIDO) • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· • ·--___ _
(RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS····------
DISTRICT 11
ITAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON·. ---·---
1\ TTI NSQN) • • • ·BA I LEY· · • • • ·------
NTllONY) • • • • • ·\ti EDER· • • • • ·--___ _
4/11/79
JO I NT BOMms
(RI LEY)· • • • • • • · · /:,N"J'liONY • · • • ----
(PATTI NSQN). .••. BA 1 LEY ••••• ----
(ANTHONY) •••••• -CLi,RK .•..• ·----
(GAMB I NA)··· • • • • FO>: • • • • • · • • ___ _ ( ~~~~i~J ........ CULVER ••.• • __ --( l>sK>~tAt>TP. El'f1NS :Wf\J\J::l ___ _
(GAMBI NA)······· LE BARO:~··· ----
(WAHNER) •••••••• GLOCKNEH .•• ___ _
(CORBETT)······· GRl'.HAM· • • · • __ --~GR I FF JN).····· ·REESE······ __ --
RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT. ••.••• ___ _
WELLS) .•••••••• ~OUST ON .••• ____ _
(LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON •.••• ___ _
(CRANK). •••••.•• HUTCHISOtL • ___ _
(SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO •.••• ___ _
(RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ___ _
(\mEELER) ·······WE I SHAUPT • ·----
(FINLAYSQtU b ... OLSONq· ..• ·m;-__ (E¥M+S)W~\t .•••• ORTIZ·.1!l't\J\Jt\~ __
!MAC All-ISTER) •• PATTINSON .• ___ _
CUL VER). ••••••• PERRY ••.••• ___ _
NYBORG) •••••••• PR I EST. •••• ___ _
ANTHONY) •.••••• RI LEY •.•••• ___ _
(GRAHAM) .••••.•• ROGET. ••••• ___ _
(SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• ____ _
~HUMMEl-). ••••.•• RYCKOFF .•. ·--__
\·JELSH) ••••••••• SAL TARELLl. ____ _
~JELSH) ••••••••. SHARP .•.••• ----
(PATTI NSOH) ••••• S 1 EBERT··. • ___ _
(HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH .•• • · ·--__
(ADLER) •• • •••••• STA!HON. •• ·---__
( RYCl<OFF) ..••••• STRAUSS.· •• ___ _
(ADLER) .•••••••• SVALSTAD •. ·--__
(ZOMMJCI(). ······SYLVIA.····--__
(GAIDQ) .•••••••• VARDOULIS. ·--__
( \'lINTrns) .•••.•. VELASQUEZ •• ----
(FR I ED).· • • • • • • • ~JEDAA. • • • • • ___ _
(ANTHONY).······ WI EDER.···· ___ _
(RYCKOFF) ••••••• \'H LLI AMS ••• ___ _
(VELASQUEZ) ••••• \~INTERS ••• ·• ___ _
OTHERS
HARPER •... ·---
SYLVESTfR .. --~-
LEWIS ••... ·--
CLAi~KE ••••• __ _
BRO\'HL ••••• __ _
VIOODRUFF ••• __ _
HOHENER •••• __ _
HO\'U1,rrn •••.• __
HUNT ••••••• __
KEITH ..•••• __
KEN'.!EY ••••• __
LYNSH .••••• __
MJ\D:lOX ••.•• __
MARTIIJSON •• __
PI E;~S/\LL .•• __
STE'.' El !S ••••
Tf~A·1rns •.•• __
MEETING DATE __ A_p_ri_· 1_1_1_, _1_9_7_9_ TIME 7 :30 P .M. Di STRICTS_1_,_2_,3_,_s_,_6_, 7_&_1_1 __
DISTRICT 1
WELSH)J ·······SHARP i~i· • • • -~ --
f.A.lii....-;.., i;IUO&IOOtQ E'tsa.m; ~AU> ._w_ ----
RI LEY). ••••••• ANTHONY ••••• ~ _ __
· CRANK) : • • • • HUTCH I SON ~ -__
DISTRICT 2
~FR I ED) .••••••• WEDAA • • • •••• ----1£ ----
RASH FORD) ••••• HOLT ••••••• -~ ___ _
ANTHONY) 4 ••••• ~ • ••••• -~ ----
GAMB INA) ••• •• .FOX.······· ·v----
WELLS) .... 1 ••• , ... HOUSTQ~ •••• ·------
E'HdtS) tJ.A\U> ... , BRT I Z·~~'E\(n.(SJ'_llQ.,, ----
CUL VER) •••••• "PERRY •• · ••••• ~ ----
GRAHAM) ........ ROGET ••••••• ~ ----
SEYMOUR)· • • • • • ROTH • • • •••• ~ ----
HOYT J •••• • • • • • SM I TH • ••••• ·--1.£. __ __
ADLER) •••• ••• -STANTON •••• ·~ __ --
WINTERS).···· .VELASQUEZ •• ·~ ----
DJSTRJCT 3 .
(ADLER).· .•.•. · .SVALSTAD • • · -~ ___ _
(PERRY). ••••••• CULVER •••••• ~ ___ _
(CORBETT)., •••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ ___ _
(LACAYO) ••••• , • HUDSON ....... ....tJ.L ___ _
[
SEITZ) •••••• ,. LASZLO •• · ..... Jt!!!:: ___ _
GAMBINA) •••••• ' E P 0 AQM .••• ~ ___ _
FINLAV~~····OLSON-~··)Jt:~ ~ ___
r'Hdf5) ... Q)> •• "BRTIZ.·J~tf\ ••• ~ __ .
~ NYBORG) ••••••• PR I l!iT •••••• ~ ___ _
GRIFFIN). ••••• REESE. ....... ~ ___ _
SEYMOUR) •••••• ROTH ........ ~ ___ _
(PATTINSON) •••• SIEBERT ...... 0-___ _
!ZOMMICK~ ..... ,.SY.LVIA •••••• .....---___ _
WHEELER ~ .·.,. ••• WEISHAUPT ••• Jt!!!:: _· __ _
.ANTHONY • • .. 'I • • \'{] l!BE A ......• ....JL::_ __ __
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS •• ·.·~ ___ _
DISTRICT 5
~fiUMMELJ • • • • • • ·ft I CIEBFF • • • • • V ---. _
ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ·~ ----
RYC l<OFF) • • • • • • MftA~S3 • • • • ·~ ----
DISTRICT 6
( ivci<oFF). ••••• ue um i e .... ""' ___ _
( RJ LE~) ••.•••••• ANTHONY····~ ___ _
(CRANK) •••••••• HUTCH I SON··~ ___ _
DISTRICT_.1
HOYT -:--) ••••••• SM I TH ••••••• ~ ___ _
WAHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• ~ ___ _
( /\NTHOtJ~J • • • • • ·eb\RIE,.,. \~6"-." -~ --Ce!n1znri1t,~~oto.ev,;usw,,~ ._. o.... ____ _
~WELSH)········SALTARE. LLI·· ~ GAIDO)········VARDOULIS···~ ==== ====
RYCKOFF) • • • • • WI bbl nus ... ··~ __ --.-
DISTRJCT 11
-MAC ALLl STER). PATT I NSON.. a..--·---
?/\TTl NSQN) ····BAILEY·· •••• ...,...---__ --
/\!HI IONY J • • • • • \''.I EiER • • •• ·~ ___ _
4/11/79
JOINT BOARDS
~RI LEY)········· ANTHONY···· V' --
PATTJ NSQN) ..... BA I LEY ... · · ~ --
ANTHONY) ••••••• CLARK ••••• • ..::=._ --
(GAMB l NA) ••••••. FOX········ V' __
!PERRY)" •••••••• CULVER ••• ~-~ --
ORTJZ) .1~J't\l\tOO\O. E't'AN&.WJ\~~~ --
GAMB I NA) • • • • • • • r.-E BARBN • • ftllll"' -· -
WAHNER). ••••••• GLOCKNER... V"' --
CORBETT)······· GRAHAM·····~ --
GRI FFJN) ·······REESE······ ~ --
RASHFORD). ••••• HOLT....... V __
WELLS) ••••••••• YOUSTON •••• ~ __
LACAYO). ........ HUDSON ••••• ___ _
CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON.-~ __
SEITZ) ....•.... LASZLO ...•. ~ __
RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS •• ·-=-__
WHEELER)· • • • • • ·WE I SHAU PT· • 7 --
F INLAYSQNL •••• OLSONv,.·. • • ----EVAl~S) Wl\~b .•. ORTIZ: 1Jt.N\ltfrl~-
MAC AL~ISTERL .PATTINSON •• OJ __
CULVER). ••••••. PERRY ••••• -~ __
NYBORG) •••••••• PRil!GT: ••• ·~ __
ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••••• ___ _
GRAHAM) •••••••• ROGET •••••• ~ __
SEYMOUR) ••••••. ROTH. • • • • • • __
HUMMELL ••••••• RYOIGQFli.. • • __
WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI. ~ __
\·JELSH) ••••••••• SHARP..... • ~ __
PATTINSOf~) ••••• GI EBERT.···-===-__
HOYT) ••• • •••••• SMITH.····· ........--__
~ADLER) ••••••••• STANTON •••• ~ __
RYCKOfF). • • • • • • STR.O.blf!i5j. • • ·-~-__
ADLER). • ••••••• SVALSTAD. • • """' __
I ZOMMI CK)·····.· SYLVIA ••••• ~ __
GA IDO) • • • • • ••• • VARDOULI S •• ~ __
\•lJ NTERS) • •••••• VELASQUEZ •• ~ __
FRI ED).·····.·. WEDAA. • •••• ._,,,. __
ANTHONY) ••••••• ',#lEBER ••••• ~ __
(RYCKOFF) ••••••• HILLIA'19 ••• ~ --
(VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS.... ._....., __
OTHERS
, HARPER •.••• __ ~ SYLVESTER •• __
\~ LEHIS •••••• _
' CLARKE ...• ·---
BROWN ••••• ·--
WOODRUFF ••• __
HOHENER •••• __
Hm~ARD ••••• __
HU?ff ••••••• __
KEITH .••••• __
KENMEY ••••• __
LYNCH •••••• __
MADDOX ••••• __
MART I l·iSON •• __
PIERSALL ••• __
STEVENS •••• __
TRAVERS •••• __
MEETJr~G DATE April 11 , 1979 TI ME 7:30 P .M.
~~~~~~~-
i11 ST R ICT S 1 ,2 ,3,5,6,7&11 u ~~~~~~~~
DISTRICT 1
·-~
\•/ELSH )J •• • • • • -SH/\RP \..:i· · · • ·------J~&IOQtqEVAN& .VY'A~ · a_,, ----
RI LEY) .••••.•• ANTHONY ••••• ~ ___ _
· CRANK) .•••• HUTCH l SON -1L.. ___ _
DISTRICT 2
!FRIED) .••••••• WEDAA· •••••• _L ___ _
RASHFORp) ••••• HOLT ••••••• -~ ___ _
ANTHO NY ) ••••• -~· ••••• -~ ----(GAM3 ll~A ) •.•••• FOX •..•.••• ·~ ___ _
WELLS)\.i ••• , •• HOUSTQJ'.l .••• ·~--__ EYAI~ 9) ~.A~t> .. , 9FlT I Z·JA~f\t<'iJSr~ ----
CUL VE R) ...••• ,PERRY .••••. :~ ----
GRAHAM) .•••••• ROGET .•.•••• ------
SEYI·:OUR)· • • • • • ROTH • • • • · • -~ ----
HOYT) •• ••••••· SMJ TH· ••••• -~ ___ _
ADLE R) •••• ••• .STANTO N ••••• iZ./---__
\flNTER S ) •• ···-VE LA SQ UEZ •• ·-~-___ _
f ;Ds::RirT. -~ ... -S VA L STAD •••• ~----
( )" ~PE RRY ..•••••• CULVER •••••• 15 ... ----
CORBETT)., •••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ ___ _
LAC AYO) ••••.•• HUDSON •••••• LY" ___ _
lSEITZ) ..•.•••• LASZ LO •.•••• ~
C:iAMBI NA) •.••.• t!t?n~.R6# ..• -~ ----
Fl NLAY (S~) ····OLSON-~·~· •• O"t'O.fi == == ~) ... ~l> .. ,OFlTIZ .. J~ .. ~ oO--' .
1
NYI30RG)1. ,-.-.7-• ._f'/.. ~R4 E ST •.•.•• ~ == ==
GRIFFIN .....• REESE. ..•.•• _iL_.. ___ _
SEYMOUR ..••.. ROTH ..•..•.• ~
1(PATTIN S~N) •••• 3JEBERT •• ···~ == ==
ZOMMIC K ~ •• ~.,.SYLVIA ••.•••
\~HEELER •••••. WEISHAUPT ••• Ji:?====
"ANTHONY • · • , • • WJ:EOCR .•...• ~
VELAS QUEZ) •••• WINTERS ••••• _-V_ == ==
DISTRICT 5
!liLJMMEL)~ • • • ·fM:lfo i I · • · •. V ___ _
ANTHO NY)····· ·RILEY ······· l/' --_· _
RYC l\QFF) •• • • • • Sif".iR~l:J S S • • • • • V ___ _
DISTRICT 6
(R-YCKOFF) .••••• Me::>-!~ •••• ~ ___ _
( R l L EY) .••••••• ANTHONY· • • • • r::-___ _
( CHANK) •••••••• HU T CH l SON · • ·--___ _
DISTRICT 7
~OY_:_t:-)-.•••••• SMIT~ .••.••. i/ ___ _ (l•i AH,~c:R • • • • • •• GLOCK NER ••.• V-
( /\NTH m.IJ'.) • • • • • -~\·, i · · · · .-;;;T ----
( eRT l l)ll\~~~010.~w~~.b. 0-' ----
(1-:E L SH) • ·······SALTAREL LI· ·--V-----
( G/\IDO) ••.•.••• VA!rnouu S ·. -~== ==
(RYC KOFF) •..••• \~~····~--__
DLSTRBl11
IT
f..c ALLI STER)·P/'.TTIN SON·. ~-·-__
/\TTJ NSQN ) .... BAILEY·· ..•• ~
NT! l ONY ) •••••. W:l H H:j;1 •••••• ,/ == ==
~/1117 9
JO I NT BOMWS
iRJLEY). ·······-ANT HONY···· ~ __
PATTI NSQN ) •••.. BA IL EY .... -~ --
/\IHH ONY ) ..•.•.. CL AR K ...... C::::u __
(G/\MBIN/\) •••.••. Fo x .•..•... l / --
(PERRY)tj· ·······C UL V ER .•.•. 1/7" --
(ORT l l) .JF\Jl"l~IO O\.C! E\'i'lill S ,WA ~b. ~ __
(GAM B I NJ\). ······.1.o--tit~---~ --
(WAH NER) .••.••.. GL OC KNER ... /,,/ __
!COR B ETT)······ · GR/\HAM· • · • · _iL. __
GRIFFIN) .••••. ·R EESE ·· ..•. V __
RASHFORD) .•••.. HO L T •.••.•• 1i'f7""'
WE LL S) .••.•.••. ~W U S T O N •••. =z --
!LACAYO) •..•.•.. HUDSON ..••. ~ ==
CRAN K ) .••••..•. HU T CH I SON •. ......1:L_ __
SEJTZ) ..•.••.•. L AS ZLO ••.• -~-
RYC KOFF) •.••••. tie" IN NI S .•. ~-
\'iHEELER) ·······WE I SHAU PT ··----
(FINLAYSQN) ••••• OL SON v,: ••• /,,/ __
EVl'\11'5) WE\~.b ... ORT I l: 1Jt.H\.J\tt)Dl0 ~-
MAC All-I STER ) •. PA T TINS OIL. ~ __
CULVE R ) ••...••. PERRY .•..•• ~-
NYBORG) •••.•••• P.~ •..• -~ ·--
ANTHO NY ) ••••.•. RIL EY ••.••. ~ __
G R A~AM ) .•.••.•• RO GET •.•.•• ~ __
SEYl·10UR ) .•..•.. RO TH •••..•. ___ _
HU MMEL) •..••••• R~~-.•• i..../ __
HELSH) ••••••••. S ALTA R E L LI-~ __
\·IELSH) .••.••••• SHA RP ••.••• --1.L.. __
P/\TTI NSOH) ••..• 6JEBE RT ..•• _.. __
HOYT) .....••••• SMITH .• ·... i7 __
iADLE R) ..••••.•• STAIH ON .... ~ __
RYCKOFF). ·. · • •• -&ifiR~ .•.• ___ _
ADLER) •..•••••. SVALS TAD ..• -1:::::._ __
( Z OMM I CK ). ·• ••.. SYL V I A ..•.• _L __
(GAIDO) ...•.••.. V ARDOUL IS .. ~--
!\·/JNTE RS) ...•••. VEL ASQUEZ.. __
F R I ED ).····· •• • \t/ED AA. • .•. -~-
AN T HONY).······ I,_,, I EDE R ..... ___:.:::: __
(RYC KOFF) •.•••.. \·ll LLI AM S ··· z --
(VELA SQU EZ) .•••. l~I NT E RS .... __
OTHERS
~~ HA RPER •.... __
SY L VE ST ER .. __
LEYJIS .•.... __
CLA RKE ..... __ _
BRO"l'/I~ •..... __
\·IO ODRU F F ..• __
HOHENER .•.• __
Hm/ARD ••... __
HLHH ..•...•
l ~E!T li ...... __
KENl !E Y ••..•
L YIK H ..... .
Mf,D DOX .•.. ··-
MARTI I i SON .. __
PJ Ef'.S/\L L .•• __
ST E\'El !S •...
T f\A V ERS •.••
APRIL 11, 1979, MTG . NOTES
t"'trr Griffin introduced new Director Lester Reese, Gambina i ntr oduced
returning Director Don Fox and Winters advised Ve lasquez was the
new mayor in Fullerton.
(7-a) Report of the Joint Chairman
Saltarelli called an Executive Commi ttee meeting f or Apri l 25th and
invited Directors Culver and Bailey to attend. Reported t hat the
E.C. will be considering the staff's recommendat i ons re l at i v e to the
remaining steps to complete the EPA Environmenta l Impac t Statement
to add the needed capacity to the Treatment Plan t s . Sa i d t h e staff
and the Districts' EIS consultant will be meeting with San Francisco
EPA personne l next Wednesday, April 1 8th .
(7-b) Report of the General Manager
Said he had some bad news. Was in Washington, D .C. l a s t month and
appropriations are the big thing now. In 1977 Co ngress allo cated
$5 billion of which $5 00 million was for California each ye ar. The
administration recommended $3.8 billion and thoug ht that i t would go
through. However, last month deci ded EPA hadn't spent the money
allocated to them in the last years so they recommended z e ro budget
for this year. Senate recommended $2~ billion. Hearings are still
continuing. May change EPA's mind about ocean wa ivers. S aid in
California alone if everybody has to put in seco n dary tre a tment,
are looking at over one-half billion dollars.
Also, was called by Executive Officer of Regiona l Board yesterday and
he informed FAH that there was goin g to be a hearing on Ap ri l 27th
and he was recommending a cease and desist order against t h e Districts
for failure to meet solids handling faci lities requirements. Because
of lack of place for sludge, have l et th e solids disposal go to th e
ocean. FAH said he thinks we have adequate information and with Coyote
landfill don't expect too much of a problem. Apparentl y , they think
we shouldn't be taking sludge from other people in the Coun ty because
we haven't been able to handle it. What we have been t aking isn 't
much but to the Regional Board don't think we sho uld take anybody elses.
We can meet our requirements when we centrifuge . We ge t 30 0 y ards of
sludge per day and have to do something with it . Have bo ught the
equipment and when it is dry, it works very well. Our contractor is
working at the landfill site. Expects to have burm up and catch basin
all installed within about two weeks. These are Regiona l Board 's
requirements. The reason why we are in troub l e is becaus e Re g ional
Board went after our contractor, Golden West Fertilizer, an d h e lost
his lease. Added that in a few weeks will be some hearing b y peop l e
in LA/OMA Project, referred to notic e in Directors' f o lders. They
spent $2 ~-3 million on what we shoul d do wi th our s l udge. Th e ir report
for the next 10-15 years says we should continue with what we are doing.
Their recommendation is to get cadmium l evel down where it could be
recycled. Would have to do this through t h e sourc e . As far a s landfill,
we have a solids handling grant for Plant 2 for sludge tha t wo uld be
created as a result of secondary treatment. We are building it at th e
present time. As long as we have a p l ace where we can tak e our sludge,
we can meet our discharge requirements.
Mr . Harper then brie f ly reviewed su pplemental agenda items. Said
the attorneys for the AMSA group met in St . Louis last we e k o n enforce -
ment and he had asked TLW to attend tha t meeting and is n o w a sk ing
Directors to authorize reimburseme nt for his e xpenses. Re Di strict 7,
have standard resolution ordering annexation wh i ch has been a pproved
by LAFC and all fees paid. City of Ora n ge agreement now a p p r oved by
city and recommending that we now approve it . Re i tem 22 (c ), in
1977 we inadvertently issued a conne ction permit to a prope r t y owne r
that was going to build a house on Sirrine Dr i ve in Cowan Hei ghts a r ea
and property was outside the District. In the meantime t h e o r i g inal
property owner sold the house so are recommend ing that $30 p e r month
be assessed this new owner until de ta ils c an be work e d o u t .
(7-c) Report of the General Counsel
TLW reported re St. Louis meeting. First time t his g r oup ha s gotten
together and it was done at the urging of FAH as P res i dent o f AMSA and
Lee White. Were 24 there plus Chief of Enforceme nt Di v i sion of
Washington EPA. Met all day. Got a tremendous cross sec tion of opin ions
on how to deal with EPA. The attorney from EPA was qui t e able to
provide good information with regard to their pr oce ss i n g o f a var i ety
of things such as noncompliance of the Water P ol l ut io n Contro l Act.
Reviewed specific cases of cities who are having majo r probl e ms
with EPA. TLW commended FAH as they said our ag ency h as the best
reputation in the whole country on our handling of EP A requirements.
Good information and meeting was very worthwhil e .
C PMM report re Draft Financial Plan and Reve nue Prog ram
Bill Butle r reported there are two separate eleme n ts of r evenue prog ram--
user charge and cost recovery in which we charge industry. Re user
charge, have three elements: (1) residential and smal l nonresidential -
will continue to bill those people on tax roll. Wi ll take a po rtion
of the 1 % allocation that County provides t o cover costs of Districts.
(2) industrial users & (3Wederal and State agenci es who discharge to
Sanitation Districts' facilities -These industrial a nd tax-exempt
users will be billed by Sanitation Districts based upo n their usage
of the system (amount of flow and pollutants they actua lly dis charge )
The program will be good for the next couple of years depending upon
what happens in the State Legislature and what happens to o p e ration
and maintenance costs such as power costs and depending u pon d istribu-
tion of County to District. We may end u p with a s hort fa l l from
residentail users. May not be able to col l ect enough. I n tha t case
we have an item in the revenue program with four options to cover us .
All of them are somewhat unpalatabl e . Realist i cally , in a couple years
we may have to deal with these: (1) Have a line on the tax bil l for
Sanitation District charges. (2) Go back to water purveyo rs (150 throughout
the county) and have them bill for s ewer charge s on their wate r bi lls.
(3) Perform a direct billing by Sanitation Dis tricts for 400 ,000 pa rc els .
(4) Go back to e lectorate and ask for separate t ax levy. None of them
are pleasant opt ions but have address ed them. An ticipate t hat at l east
for the next couple years, will b e able to cover expense s by a d valorem
taxes. As far as industrial cost recovery, that r e quiremen t wa s
levied by the government. Industrial users are required to r e turn
their share of eq uipment costs to Districts an d we return certain
amount back to government. We have calculated the rates . At this
point there is a moratorium on thos e ra tes . It is i n t he hands of
-2-
the Office of Managme nt and Budget. It i s the f e eling t h at the
moratorium will remain for the inun ediate future .
With regard to how we manifest thi s program, will do so in an
ordinance. It will b e requiring the Districts' ordinanc e to change
the we we bill industrial users sli ght ly. Will no t cause us to have
a public hearing . Currently Districts' staff is giv ing con s ideration
to consolidation . If we have to have a h earing , will consi d er go ing
to public with consolidation public hearing and deal with t h at issue
at the same time. Program will requir e some mi n or modifica t i ons to
agreements with inter-District agencies. Also, the r evenu e program
is intended to address District long-rang e plann ing requirements .
Will address annexation and connection fees. No t a requirement of
revenue program but will be incorporated as long-ra n g e planning fo r
the Districts .
Bailey asked if there were any other alternative s wh ic h t hey pursued
at all? Bill answered there really are not any . Said o n ce you
accept a grant for Federal faci l ities, you accep t the lia bilities
that go along . Bailey asked if they were gear e d to t he f a ir user
concept. Answered, yes, that is wri t ten into t h e law, wi ll be
equitable. Asked if we would have to option of going t o public
hearing even thogh it is not require d? Answered , I th i nk the opt ion
is always there, yes .
Olson asked re exempting governmental agenci es, what about dependent
housing on military bases? Bill stated that depe n dent housing
is not being charged. In the past h ave billed t hree ma jor bases
and don 't think they pass any of the charges ba c k to the housing.
Said this wasn't an issue when th eydereloped the prog r a m so wasn 't
~ part of it.
Were no further questions. Saltarelli stated it was an exce lle n t
study .
(22-b) City of Orange Agre e me nt
TLW reported that the agreement is subs t anti a lly the same as a g reements
with Santa Ana, Tustin and Costa Mesa Sanitary Distric t . I s a slight
difference. Said this agreement took a great deal of time and eff9rt
to resolve between the two ag e ncies.
It was then moved, seconded and carri ed to approv e.
(27) DISTRICT 5 -Other business
Item (cc) from Consent Calendar re Big Canyon drainage ar ea -Moved
to continue this item indefinitely, no f i xed time . Seconded a nd carried.
-3-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE PROGRAM
CD RAFT)
APRIL., 1979
PEAT. MARWICK . MITCHELL & Co.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUN"I:A..NTS
660 NEWPO:HT CENTER DRNE
NEWPORT BEACB,CALJ:PORN IA 9 2 660
SECTION I. INTRODUCTION
Background
Revenue Program Document
Summarr. of CSDOC Approach
Capital Financial Plan
User Charge Approach
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OM & R Budget and Estimated Rate
!CR Rates
Revenue and Expense History
Cash Flow Projection
Outstanding Debt
Appropriation of Funds
Consolidation of Districts
SECTION II. CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN
Capital Project Planning
Classification of Projects
Funding Sources -Historical
Funding Sources -Future
Connection Fees
Annual Capital Charge
Construction Grants
Reserves
Annexation Fees
General Obligation Bonds
Revenue Bonds
Interest
ICR
Capital Fund Structure -Accumulated Cap'ital Outlay Fund (ACOF)
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF)
Facilities Revolving Fund
Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR) Fund
Revenue Program Form S
SECTION ILL REVENUE PROGRAM DESIGN
Applicable Regulations
USER CHARGE SYSTEM DESIGN
Impact of Proposition 13
Page
I-1
I-1
I-4
I-4
I-5
I-5
I-6
I-7
I-7
I-8
I-10
I-11
I-11
II-1
II-1
II-2
II-2
II-3
II-4
II-5
II-5
II-5
II-6
II-6
II-6
II-6
II-7
II-7
II-7
II-7
II-7
III-1
III-1
III-I
III-2
Plans for UC in the Event AV Taxes Are
Insuffici~nt to Pay OM & R
DISTRICTS' ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
Fund Structure
Replacement and Depreciation
WORK ORDER SYSTEM
Input
Allocation
Reconciliation
Work Order System Relationship to OM & R
BILLING SYSTEM
Residential/Small Non-residential
Industrial/Commercial
Tax Exempt/Governmental/Institutional
INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY SYSTEM DESIGN
Preliminary Calculation
Rate Calculation
Cash Control & Funds Management
Billing
Flow Charts
SECTION IV. RATE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
Rate Structures
User Charge Rate Calculation
Determination of Individual/Group User Charges
Proportionality
ICR Rate Calculation
Determination of Individual ICR Charges
SECTION V. REVENUE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
UC/ICR Rates
UC Rates
Notification
Data Base Refinement
Ordinance Modifications
Computer System Development
Inter-Agency Agreements
-2-
III-3
III-8
III-8
III-9
III-10
III-10
III-10
III-10
III-11
III-16
III-16
III-16
III-17
III-17
III-18
III-19
III-19
III-20
III-20
VI-1
IV-1
IV-2
IV-3
IV-4
IV-4
IV-5
V-1
V-1
V-2
V-·3
V-3
V-5
V-6
V-7
SECTION VI. APPENDIX
Appendix A -Letter from Neil Dunham to J. Wayne Sylvester
dated August 9, 1978, approving ad valorcm system
Appendix B -Justification of Parameter Allocation Percentages
of Cost Centers
Appendix C -Justification of the Proposed Use of Average
Annual vs. Maximum Waste Loads as the Basis
of ICR Payments
Appendix D -Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction
Agreement
SECTION VII. SWRCB REVENUE PROGRAM FORMS
Form 1.0 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -All Districts
Form 1.1 Sununary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 1
Form 1.2 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics. -District No. 2
Form 1.3 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 3
Form 1.4 Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 5
Form 1. 5
Form 1. 6
Form 1. 7
Summary of \faste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 6
Summary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 7
Sununary of Waste Users and Waste Characteristics -District No. 11
Form 2.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Data
Form 2.1
Form 2.2
Form 4
Form 6
Form 7
Form 8
Form 9
LIST OF FIGURES
Operations and Maintenance Cost Data -Detail
Operations and Maintenance Cost Data -Detail
Industrial Cost Recovery Allocations
Unit Cost Determination
Summary of Fund Costs
Annual Review
Rate Determination and Revenue Program Summary
Figure 1 -Revenue and Expense History
Figure 2 Five-Year Cash Flow Projection
Figure 3 -Existing Bonded Indebtedness
TABLES
Table II-1 -Projected Cap:i.tal Revenues and Expenditures
1978-79 through 1983-84
Table III-1 -Alternative Plans for User Charges When
AV Taxes Are Insufficient to Pay OM & R Costs
Table III-2 -Identification of Work Orders and Cost Centers
Table III-3 -Parameter.Allocation Percentages for Cost
c"enters
-3-
I-8
I-9
I-10
II-3
III-5
III-12
III-15
I. INTRODUCTION
This is the Financial Plan and Revenue Program of the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County (CSDOC).
l3ackground
CSDOC provides major sewage collection systems and treatment and disposal facili-
ties for approximately 1. 7 million residents of 23 Orange. County cities, as well as
some unincorporated territories in the metropolitan area. CSDOC is made up of seven
independent Districts, each with its own Board of Directors and taxing authority.
The Districts' legal authority derives from Section 4700 et. seq. of the California
Health and Safety Code. Each District owns its own trunk sewer (collection) system
and a share of the joint treatment works with the share of ownership for the latter
based on the average of flow and assessed valuation. Joint works treatment (OM & R)
costs are distributed to Districts on the basis of flow. (See Joint Ownership and
Operations_ Agreement attached as Appendix D.)
Except for purposes of collection the seven Districts operate jointly and as a
si~gle unit in most respects. TI1e seven Boards of Directors meet in joint sessions,
setting policy and givfog direction to a single professional staff that provides
operation, maintenance and administrative services to the Districts individually
and jointly. A copy of the joint powers agreement is included in Section VI.
The treatment works consists of two inter-connected plants with a present
capacity of 184 MGD aver_age flow. Treated effluent is discharged through a five-
mile long, deep water ocean outfall.
Through inter-.agency agreements CSDOC provides. services to other .agencies
outside of CSDOC's boundaries. These agreements are ~eviewed in Section V.
In 1972, Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
(PL 92-500) which basically required higher levels of treatment throughout the
nation and specified that agencies receiving grants (also established by the law)
must adopt a user charge program in which each user pays for wastewater treatment
I-1
services in proportion to his use. In 1977, the Clean Water Act was amended and re-
affirmed the need to have a federally-approved revenue program but provided some
new options.
The Act and subsequent EPA regulations require that all agencies must have revenue
programs approved by the EPA before July 1, 1979, in order to continue qualifying for
grant payments. The revenue program is required to comply with Federal and State
Revenue Program guidelines and to be adopted by the governing board of each agency.
Also required of an acceptable revenue program is that (1) .general user classes pay·
proportionally to their u·se of the ·system as a class, (2) total revenues be sufficient·
to properly operate and maintain sewerage facilities, (3) adequate capital funds be
_. provided for future facilities replacement. Users in (1) above must be classified
into residential/s~all non-residential, industrial/large commercial or tax exempt
groups.
Since their inception, the Sanitation DistriC·ts· have been essential.ly financed
through the application of an ad valorem tax adopted annually by each District's
Board of Directors and collected on the County tax bill, Bonds were issued in
1951 fo·r construction of initial capital facili tie.s. With the exception of
similar issues in .1958, 1962 and 1973 in certain Districts for trunk sewer
expansion, it has been the policy of the Districts for many years to finance
required sewerage facilities by accumulation of funds from ad valorem taxes and
connection fees over a period of several years prior to the time the facility was
needed. Obviously, construction of additional treatment facilities is followed by
the attendant increas~ in operation and maintenance costs.
In 1970, the Districts instituted an industrial user charge. It requires
industrial dischargers to pay for the capital and operation and maintenance costs
associated with treating their wastes. Each industrial discharger is permitted to
subtract from his calculated user charge the amount paid to the Districts in taxes.
Tax exempt users do not presently pay for services with the exception of a few large
federal and state installations.
I-2
As a result of the federal requirements the Districts have been faced with major
capital expenditures for facilities construction and the att~ndant operating and
'-' maintenance costs for said-facilities that will more than double. The need to con-
struct the above-mentioned facilities as the result of the 1972 Act was anticipated
and the Districts have been accumulating the capital funds to provide the necessary
facilities, most of which have been grant eligible. The 1977 Clean Water Act
Amendments included a provision (largely through the efforts of our Districts) allowing
.-waiver from the full secondary treatment requirement for ocean dischargers. The
Districts have submitted an application and expect to receive such a waiver. This
will enable capital funds accumulated for the final stages of secondary treatment
facilities at Plant No. 2 to be reappropriated for other capital projects thus avoid-
iJlg a. general· capital levy against current users for at least the next fiv.e:-::years .
.-If, however, the waiver request is denied, additional capital funds will be required,
as well as increased OM & R revenues.
The purpose of this document is to demonstrate to the California State Water
Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (pPA) CSDOC's compliance with Federal and State Clean Water Grant Requirements.
_, Applicable regulations establishing these requirements are the Federal Water Pollution
Cantrel Act of 1977 (Public Law 95-217) as set forth in 40 CRF Part 35 and the
California Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 as set forth in State Clean Water Grant
Bulletins Numbers 54A and 68. The need for CSDOC to comply with these regulations
results .from the Districts' acceptance and use of approximately 27 million dollars
._. in Clean Water Grant funds to construct a 46 million gallon per day (MGD) secondary
treatment facility at its Reclamation Plant No. 1. The grant-funded facility,
CSDOC's project number C-06-0779,is currently in partial operation and will be
fully operational by July 1, 1979, the date this Revenue Program will take effect.
This Financial Plan and Revenue Program is intended to apply to all other grant-
funded projects subject to said regulations, as well as to C-06-0779.
I-3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revenu e Program Doc um e nt
This Fina ncial Plan and Revenue Program is divide d i nto seven ma jor sections :
I.
II.
III.
INTRODUCTI ON -Outlines the overall approach taken by the Districts
in c omplying with the app licable regulat ion s a nd describes the
h istorical and financial se tting for this program.
CAPIT AL FIN /\NC IAL PLAN -Describ es the Districts' approach to
financing required capital projects, especially over the next
five years.
REV EN UE PROGRAM DESIGN -Discusses how th e Districts will organize
and estab l ish the User Charge (UC) and Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR)
systems prescribed by 40 CFR Part 35.
IV. RE VENUE PROGRAM RATE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY -Sets forth the pro-
cedures to be u sed in determining actual UC and I CR rates .
V. RE VENUE PROGRAM I MPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE -Outlines the steps the
Di stricts will take in order to bring their sewer use ordinance ,
accounting system , inter-agency agreements and some other elements
into conformance with the ove rall Revenue Program implement ation.
VI. APPENDICES
sections.
Contains appropriate documents r efe rred to in other
VII. SWRCB REVE NUE PROGRAM FORMS -Includes copies of State Water Resou r ces
Contro l Boards' required Reve nu e Proeram forms .
Summary of CSDOC 0J2..proach
Th ree m::i.jor e l ements t h at applicab l e regul::i.tions r equire t h e Di stricts to
~ address arc capital financial planning, establishment of a user charge system and
establis hment of a n ICR system. -
I -4
Capital Financial Plan
Current federal law requires full secondary treatment of CSDOC's flows. The
._ Districts have applied for.a waiver of this requirement, and if the waiver is
approved, the Districts anticipate being able to meet all capital need for both
treatment and disposal facilities, as well as trunk sewer construction, over the next
f~ve years without having to issue bonds or institute additional· capital fees. How-
ever, existing capital fee structures may require modification! Long-range fiscal
planning has provided. current capital funds which, combin~d with continued grant
revenues and connection fee income, will be the primary source for capital funding.
over the five-yea~ period. ·The plan provides that construction costs applicable to
existing users; such as upgrading treatment facilities and reconstru~tion, be paid
by said users by utilizing current reserves and costs of providing additional capacity
be paid for. by future users through c.onnection fees.
User Charge Approach
The Districts.have historically relied on ad valorem (AV) tax revenues as the
major source of financing operations, maintenance and replacement (OM & R) costs.
In addition, la.rge industrial and commercial dischargers are billed for the added
tllld load they place on the system. Since billing and collection mechanisms for the AV
tax are already in place, making this approach the most cost effective, the Districts
plan to base their user charge system on this source in accordance with 40 CPR 35.929-l(b).
AV revenues will be supplemented by direct billings to appropriate users as outlined
below:
Residential and small non-residential users will be treated as a
.group with individual user charges levied according to the assessed
valuation of the property. Users in this category include single
family and multi-family dwellings and businesses which discharge no
more than the equivalent of 25,000 gallons per day (GPO) of domestic
strength sanitary waste. A user in this classification will pay its
UC entirely through the Districts' share of the AV tax. general levy.
I-5
-Industrial and large commercial users will receive direct billings for .
UC on the basis of actual flow and loading characteristics of their
discharges. Such users include all dischargers of more than the equiva-
lent of 25,0~0 GPD domestic strength wastes or toxic pollutants. Such
users are more fully defined in 40 CFR 35.905.
Tax exempt users and those receiving substantial AV tax credits will
also be billed directly based upon actual use. In the CSDOC service
area such users are for the most part Federal and State agencies which
will be billed based upon assumed flow/loading figures per employee
multiplied by the number of employees at each facility. It is our
interpretation of the law that local government dischargers will be
exempt.
In brief, the procedure that will be used by CSDOC to determine UC rates is as
follows:
1. Establish the user data base showing individual user and/or user
group contribution by wa~te~at~r characterstic ·(flow, biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS)).
2. Tot.al the contributions of all users by characteristic.
3. Determine total annual OM & R costs (via the budget).
4. Distribute all OM & R costs to appropriate costs per characteristic.
5. Derive unit costs for each characteristic by dividing total cost
per characteristic by total flow or BOD and SS loading.
6.
7.
Apply unit costs per characteristic to each user/user group's
discharge quantities and loadings.
Establish individual/group user charge by adding the user/user
. group's cost per characteristic.
OM & R Budget and Estimated Rates
1he Districts' final OM & R budget for FY 1980 will not be determined until July
or August, 1979. Therefore, actual user charge rates will not be calculated until
that time. In order to derive approximate user charge rates and to demonstrate
_. that the methodology employed by the Districts will result in a distribution of
charges that are proportionate to use, estimated budget figures have been shown on
I-6
Form 2 and have been used as an input to preliminary calculations set forth herein.
This has allowed CSDOC to determine approximate user charges for each user category:
'-' (1) residential/small non-residential, (2) industrial/large commercial and (3) tax
exempt/governmental.
Individual UC amounts for industrial users based on these estimated figures
have not been calculated because of the large size of the industrial/commercial data
base and the fact that the charges would have to be recalculated using final budget
~ figures. While actual charges have not been computed, the formula is found in
....
Section IV. Total OM & R costs and rates allocable to industrial users as a group
have been computed and are found on Form 8.
ICR Rates
In brief, the proc~dure used to calculate ICR rates is as follows:
1. Determine the grant-funded cost of the project.
2. Distribute the grant-funded costs to wastewater treatment parameters
(flow, BOD & SS) based on engineering analysis.
3. Divide the cost attributable to each parameter by 30 years on the
life .of the plant, whichever is less; to determine the annual per-
characteristic cost.
4. Apply annual per-characteristic costs to each industrial user based
on the user's flow/loading.
Since actual grant-funded costs are known-, actual· ICR rates have:been calculated
on the attached SWRCB Reven~e Program forms.
Revenue and Expense History
Figure 1 shows the Districts revenue and expense history over the three-year
qFI period FY 1976 -FY 1978.
I-7
FIGURE 1
REVENUE AND EXPENSE HISTORY
Year Ended June 30,
1978 1977 1976
Operating Revenue -Permit and Inspection Fees $ 2,670 $ 13,175 $ 11, 382
Service Charges 530,607 614,327 252,672 -Other 195,641 99,064 112,149
By-Product Sales· .-o-55,660 51,233 .. $ 728,918 $ 782,226 $ 427,~36
Operating Expenses -Operations $6,744,499 $5J571,143 $4,645,090
Other -·o-. -0-27,608 ·-$6,744,499 $5,571,143 $4,672,698
w.J.,
Operating (Loss) ($6,015,581) ($4,788,917) . ($4' 425' 262)
--Non-Operating Revenues
~ ~roperty Tax $6' 041, 58.7 $3,134,220 $4, 714, 776
Interest 519,455 2,085,412 721,873 .. Annexation Fees 9,975 7,800 1,950
Other 70, 116 59,468 35,887
Total Non-Operating Revenues $6,641,133 $5,286,900 $5,474,486 ....
Non-Operating Expenses $ 120,239 $ 50,537 . $--0--Net Earni_ngs $ 505,313 $ 447:,446 $1,229,224
Cash Flow Projection
The Districts' cash flow projections for the period FY 1979 through FY 1983
are shown on Figure 2.
I-8
l
o::SCRIPTION
A?PRO?RIATEO RESERVES & CARRY-OVER FROM
PRECEDING FISCAL YEAR (CASH & INVESTM~NTS)
Taxes:
Anticipated Allocation of 1% Maximum
Tax Levy@ 1.08
Tax Levy for Debt Obligations
Federal & State Construction Grants
Fees:
Connection Fees
User Charge~ & Othe~ Fees
Sale of Capacity Rights
Loan in Aid of Construction
Other lnco~e
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
EX?P;D I TURES
Joint Works Treatment Plant Construction
District Collection System Construction
Industrial Cost Recovery Payments to
Federal Government
Repay Loa~ in Aid of Construction
Bond Retirement & Interest
Share of Joint Works M & 0 Costs
District Collection System M & O and
Other Opcr~tir.g Costs
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Appropriated Reserves & Carry-Over to Next
Fiscal Year ~Cash & Investments)
I
.t' LllUIU~ ~
( I Vcarl l Flcl l)ec!. I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. ALL
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1979/80 THROUGH 1982/83
1978-79
$ 88,619,000
10,080,000
1,'911,000
13,759,000
3,424,ooo
1, 161,000
"260,000
450,000
5,657,000
$125 321 000
29,640,000
9,794,ooo
17,000
2,132,000
8, 153,000
1 91 ,000
$ 51,655,000
$ 73,666,000
1979-80
$ 73,666,000
10,886,000
1,979,000
·1a,752,ooo
2,718,000 ,
2,104,000
73,000
5, 157 ,000
$115,335,000
29,435,000
9,765,000
189,000
121,000
2,061,000
10,255,000
0 000
$ S'3,776,000
' $ 61,559,000
1980-81
$ .61,559,000
11,757,000
1,920,000
2·1,035,000
2,357,000
2,475,000
73,000
4 309 000
$105,485,000
28,050,000
3,299,000
189,000
161,000
2,002,000
12,306,000
2 04 000
$ 48,052,000
$ 57,433,000
I (
1981-82
$59,433,000
• 12,698,006
1,899,000
12,456,000
2,357,000
3,298,000
73,000
4,020,000
$94,234,ooo
17,270,000
3,060,000
~84,000
161,000
1,981,000
16,820,000
2. JO 000
$41,973,000
$52,261,000
I ( I (
REVISED 3/8/79
1qs2-a3
$52,261,000
13,714,ooo
1,839,000
4,685,000
2,357,000
3,558,000
73,000
3 658.0CO
• $82, 145,000
7,3&5,000
2, 178,000
. 484,ooo
161,000
1, 921,000
20, 184,000
2
$34,663,000
$47,477,000
Five-Year
Total
$ 88,619,000
59,135,0CO
9,548,C:JO
70,687,000
13,213,000
12,596,000
552,000
450,000
2 2 , Bo 1 , oo_o
$277 ,601. 000
111,760,000
. 28,096,000
1,346,000
621;oco
10,097,COO
67,718,000
10 486.000
$230, 124,000
$ 47,477,000
Outstanding Debt
As previously noted, general obligation bonds were issued in the past for con-
struction of both District and joint works facilities. Figure 3 summarizes the .
Districts' existihg debt as a result of those issues.
FIGURE 3
EXISTING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
Total Debt
District(s) Year Inte:i,·est Principal Service
Bond Issue Indebted Retirement Remaining Remaining Remaining
1951 1,2,3,5,7,11 1990 $ 334.279 $ 1,772,500 $ 2,106,779
1958 2,3,5 1999 1,386, 710 6,015,000 7 ,401, 710
1962 7 1992 509,750 1,260,000 1,769,750
1970 7 1990 1,418,449 3,500,000 4,918,449
TOTAL $3,649,188 $12,547,500 $16,196,688
None of the indebtedness discussed above related to financing bf the Districts'
share of grant funded projects and is, therefore, given no further consideration in
... the Revenue Program.· SWRCB Debt Service Schedule Form 3, is, therefore, not
included herein. The discussion is included merely for purposes of describing the
Districts' overall ·financial plan.
Annual principal and intere~t payments are made from an ad valorem tax levy
.against the property within the Districts. The authorized levy is over and above
~ the 1% tax charge allowed by the Jarvis-Gann Initiative and shows as a separate item
on the property tax bill. The Boards of Directors, however, reserve the right to
appropriate funds from any other source to retire the bonds and interest.
Debt service income and expenditures are accounted for in a separate Bond and
Interest Sinking Fund (BI & S) established for each issue.
I-10
Appropriation of Funds
The Boards of Directors are vested with the power to app!opriate monies from any
~ source or fund from time to time to be used for any purpose allowed by the enabling
authority to satisfy the financial requirements and maintain the fiscal integrity
of the Districts consistent with the intent of this Revenue Program and its long-
term objectives.
Consolidation of Districts
Concurrent with consideration of this Revenue Program the Boards of Directors
are evaluating the feasibility of consolidating the seven Districts into one County
Sanitation District. \~1ile such a consolidation would not result in material amend-
ments to this Revenue Program certain revisions would be necessary to reflect the
consolidated status of the Districts and any ch<l:nges emanating therefrom.
Therefore, any forthcoming approval of such a consolidation by the Boards of
Directors shall constitute authorization for the General Manager to revise this
Revenue Program and its forms, figures, tables, schedules and provisions to
appropriately reflect the conditions and provisions of such consolidation, as needed,
to enable proper implementation and administration of said ·Revenue Program.
I-11
II. CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN
This section of the Revenue Program describes the Districts' planned approach
to financing capital projects. It addresses the planning procedures, background,
fund structure and funding alternatives that apply to construction of plant and
equipment.
Capital Project Planning
Planning -Capital project requirements are defined in the Districts' Facilities
Plan for treatment l\"Orks and in the master plans of the respective Districts for trurik
sewer and pumping station facilities. These plans are reviewed annually and period-
ically updated. In conjunction with the annual budget process capital construction
requirements for the ensuing five-year period are analyzed and construction scheduling
and financing is updated and incorporated into the budget document and five-year fiscal
projections.
Classification of Projects -Capital projects are classified into one of three
categories to acconunodate determination of financing sources. The classifications and
appropriate funding sources are set forth below:
Project ·classification
Improvements -Facilities to
. upgrade or improve the level
of treatment or the processing
capabilities.
Expansion -Facilities to pro-
vide additional capacity re-
quired because of property
development.
Reconstruction -To rebuild
capital facilities when use-
ful life has been exhausted
Future Primary
Funding Source
Annual Capital Charge*
Connection Fees
Annual Capital Charge*
*To be imposed only after requirements exceed exis-ting resources.
II-1
Other Alternative
Funding Sources
-G.O. Bonds
-Revenue Bonds
-Construction Grants
Annexation Fees
-Reserves
-Interest
-ICR
At the present time the Districts have sufficient construction reserves accumu-
lated through sound long-range fiscal planning -when combined with·the anticipated
-. ongoing connection fees, interest earnings and federal and state grants -to fully
fund both tr~atment works and colle~tion. system construction during the next five-
year planning period and provide adequate capital reserves to carry over to the next
planning period. Figure 2 includes estimated expenditures and the funding sources
in sumrna::ry form.
Funding Sources
Historical -In thP. years immediately after formation of the Districts, general
obligation bonds were issued to fund initial outl~ys for purchase or construction of
collection, treatment and disposal facilities. Although further bonds·were issued in
1958 by Districts 2 and 3,and in 1962 and 1970 by District· 7, to partially fund collec-
-=i tion facilities, no bonds have been required since the 1951 issue for treatment and
....
disposal facilities. Rather, the Districts have employed a combination of ad valorem
tax revenues raised via a capital element of the annual property tax levy, federal
and state grant funds,and connection and annexation fees to finance required
construction.
Many years ago the Boards of Direc'!ors established long-range fiscal planning
which incorporated a pay-as-you-go policy for funding capital improvements. This
foresight has enabled the above financing sources to fully fund the trunk sewer (with
the exception of the above-mentioned 1958, 1962 and 1970 bond issues) and plant
construction to date and, as noted above, essentially fund said construction for
the next five years, assuming waiver of full secondary treatment requirements .
Future -With the limitations placed on ad valorem property tax by virtue of
the Jarvis-Gann Initiative, anticipated future tax revenues will be appropriated to
finance operations and maintenance expenses, as described later in this Revenue
Program, and thus be unavailable for capital requirements.
11-2
~·
The Districts' plan for funding capital projects in the future is based on the
principle that such projects should, where possible, be paid for by the users that
require said construction. Thus:
-Improvements
-Expansion
-Reconstruction
-Will be financed by all users through
such sources as an annual capital
charge.
-Will be financed by future users by
such sources as connection fees.
Will be financed by all users through
such sources as annual capital charges.
Connection Fees -Connection fees will be used as the primary financing source for
construction of facilities to provide additional system capacity needed to keep pace
with increased hydraulic demand as vacant property is developed~ Thus, the burden
for paying the cost of expansion will be placed on tve users that require such addi-
tional capacity. However, fees from this source may also be used for improvement and
~ reconstruction to the extent that new users receive benefits from such projects and
as an offset for past excess capacity funded by current users.
The connection fee calculation considers the historical cost of facilities
constructed, the cost of facilities to provide added capacity and the capacity
requirements of the connecti_ng properties. The aver.age connection fee of the
.-Districts,with ordinances presently in effect, is $250 per residential unit as follows:
District No. Residential Commercial/Industrial
$45/1000 sq. ft. w/$220 minimum
$50/1000 sq. ft. w/$250 minimum
$130/1000 sq. ft. w/$130 minimum
2
3
5
7
$220/unit
$250/unit
$250/unit
$250/unit regular $625/acre Regular Connection w/$250
11
connection
$6.00/front ft. Trunk
Connection plus $250
$250/unit
minimum
$10.00/front ft. Trunk Connection
$500 minimum plus $625/acre
$50/1000 sq. ft. w/$250 minimum
The Boards of Directors periodically review their policies relative to connection
.., fees and will continue to do so in the future, making changes from time to time as
deemed appropriate.
. . ·. II-3
w/
Connection fees for properties in incorporated territories arc collected by the
cities as a one-time charge when the building permit is issued. TI1e cities keep 5%
for·administrative costs associated with their collection services. Properties in
unincorporated areas pay at the Districts' offices~
Annual Capital Charge -As discussed above, given current estimates of capital
project requirements, the Districts' on-hand reserves and .anticipated other revenue
sources should be sufficient to meet all capital financing requirements through
1.=:' FY 1984. Each year, as facilities and master plans are reviewed and updated,·the
five-year fiscal projections are prepared. A thorough analysis of the projected capital
requirements will be made and when it appears that all other sources of capital funds
will be insufficient to meet projected capital needs, a separate annual capital charge
will be established as deemed necessary by the Boards of Directors. Such a charge
would essentially represent "funded depreciation" and the amount will be determined
with due consideration of projected five-year capital funding requirements, annual
rate stabilization, annual depreciation, appropriate reserve level and other funding
sources. Again, because the Districts currently have sufficient reserves to satisfy
capital needs for the next five years, such a funding of depreciation would be inap-
.-propriate at this time.
.-1
With respect to industrial users a separate annual capital charge will continue
to be levied as an element of the annual cha_rge ,. similar to the provision for such a
charge in the existing uniform connection and use ordinance. Because of the additional
loading placed on the treatment and disposal system by the industrial conununity and
~ the generally expanding nature of their system utilization, such dischargers are
subject to a separate annual capital charge to reflect said loading and use. As in
the case of connection fees, the Boards of Directors will periodically review the
basis of the charge and initiate revision thereto as deemed necessary.
II-4
Other Alternative Funding Sources
Following is a brief discussion of other alternative funding sources available
. .t:a, for financing capital projects which may be used, as deemed appropriate by the Boards
of Directors.
...
·construction Grants -Presently the United States Environmental Protection
Agency will fund up to 75% of approved treatment works and the State Water Resources
Control Board up to 12~%. To date these funds have been available almost exclusively
for-advanced treatment facilities (improvements) only. The Districts have received
$105,000,000 in grant commitments since passage of PL 92-500. However, the availa-
bility of funds from this source in the future is uncertain. Further, many of the
Districts' capital projects are not eligible for grant funding based on federal and
state policies.
Reserves -As stated elsewhere in·this section there are currently on hand suf-
ficient funds accumulated fro~ the Boards' past pay-as-you-go finan~ing policies to
fund treatment plaat and trunk sewer construction through FY 1984. This is partially
a result of a change in the Federal Clean Water Act last year allowing waiver of full
secondary treatment requirements provided certain conditions are met. The Districts
-. feel that a waiver will be forthcoming, thus enabling the reappropriation of reserves
previously set aside for secondary treatment for other projects.
Because current reserves have been provided by current users, such funds, to the
extent possible, will be expended for the benefit of said users over the next five
years by allocating the reserves for improvement and reconstruction work in accordance
.i. with the principles set forth herein.
Annexation Fees -Annexation fees are charged to properties presently outside
the Districts' boundaries at the time they seek annexation to enable sewerage service.
The Boards, at their discretion, may establish the fee· by one of several basic
methods, based on the underlying objective which is to place the annexing property
in some degree of the relative position it would have been in had it been in the
II-5
-
-District from inception. Districts with annexable territory have adopted annexation
fee policies which establish the acreage charge based on the net equity of the District
as of the annual balance sheet date. Again, as with other types of fees set by the
Boards, the annexation fee policies are periodically reviewed and revised as appropriate.
Except for current agreements for long-term payment of fees for properties that
~ have already annexed, this source of revenue is extremely uncertain and thus does not
appear as a major item in capital funding projections. Because of the basis on which
annexation fees are calculated they may be used for improvements, expansion and
reconstruction or, in fact, non-capital items, at the Boards' discretion.
General Obligation Bonds ~ General obligation bonds are retired by tax levy
and backed by the full faith and credit of the Districts and can be floated to provide
capital funds. They require a two-thirds voter approval. It is not expected that
the Districts will have to resort to this type of financing in the foreseeable future.
Revenue Bonds -This type of debt instrument is paid off from revenues generated
by a charge against the users of the facilities which were constructed from the bond
proceeds. They require a simple majority vote by the public. A need for revenue bond
financing is not seen at this time.
Interest -Interest earnings from investment of accumulated construction reserves
are credited to the fund in which the principal is deposited and are available to
use for purposes for which said fund has been established.
ICR -Use of Industrial Cost Recovery Funds are limited as set forth in
40 CFR 35.928-2.
In addition to the above revenue sources the Boards have the option of auth-
orizing a special tax levy for capital financing. Pursuant to Proposition 13, such
~
a change would require approval of two-thirds of the electorate. Tirny may also accept
contributions in aid of construction.
Capital Fund Structure
Planning, budgeting and accounting for capital revenues and expenditures is
II-6
maintained in the following funds:
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACOF) -Each District has an ACOF to which
all capital funds except those derived from connection fees are deposited. Funds
may be disbursed for any type of project classification. For collection facilities
the disbursements are made directly from the ACOF or transferred to a suspense fund
for joint projects with another District. For joint treatment works projects the
Districts' share of required construction funds are transferred to CORF (described
be~ow), but controlled in the respective ACOF.
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) -Monies are transferred to CORF, only
as needed, from the respective ACOF's of the individual Districts based upon their
joint ownership equity percentage which is calculated from the average of each
'
District's flow and assessed valuation for a three-year period •. Disbursements are
then made directly from CORF for joint works projects.
Fad.Ii ties Revolving Fund -Districts with adopted connection fees have
established a Facilities Revolving Fund to account for such income and disbursements
for the purposes for which this revenue source has been designated.
Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR) Fund -This f?nd is to be established effective
July 1, 1979, to account for !CR receipts and disbursements as prescribed in
40 CPR 35.928-2 and more fully explained in Section III.
Revenue Program Form 5
Because the Districts' capital needs are funded through FY 1984, SWRCB Revenue
Program Capital Cost Allocation Form 5 is unnecessary and therefore not included in
Section VII of thii Revenue Program.
II-7
-III. REVENUE PROGRAM DESIGN
This section of the Revenue Program discusses how CSDOC "has organized and
will establish its' approach to meeting applicable UC/iCR regulations. After
citing those regulations, this section describes the Districts' use of an ad
._· valorem tax based user charge system, pertinent elements of the Districts
...
....
I ...
accounting system, how the work order system is used to accumulate cost for the
user charge, discusses user charge billing and outlines the Districts' approach
to ICR.
Applicable Regulations
CSDOC's Revenue Program is designed to recover OM&R and !CR costs from users
so that the UC and !CR rates are proportionate to the use of the Districts'
facilities and so that the UC and ICR systems are otherwise consistent with Federal
regulations and State guidelines. 40 CRF Part 35 dated September 27, 1978 is the
source of Federal regulations, and the Financial Plan and Revenue Program Guide-
lines (Clean Water Grant Bulletin 54A) are the primary source for State direction
on the Revenue Program's design.
USER CHARGE SYSTEM DESIGN
User charges are intended to recover operation and maintenance (including
-.. replacement) costs _of the Districts. These costs are expected to rise sharply
over the next several years as advanced treatment facilities required by the
Federal law are phased into service and the inflationary impacts are fully felt.
The objective of any system of user charges that assesses a charge to var1ous
use classes is to assure that the charge is established in proportion to the cost
of treating the wastewater from each user class and that all users pay their
reasonably proportionate share.
Because of CSDOC's historical and continuing utilization of the AV tax as
a source of revenue, the Revenue Program employs a system of user charges based
on the AV tax.
III-1
This type of system is appropriate since
-The AV system is now authorized under 40 CFR Part 35.929-1.
-Use of the AV tax approach was authorized by Mr. Neil.Dunham
SWRCB Financial Man~gement Unit in a letter to the Districts dated
August 9, 1978. See Appendix A.
-It is the most cost effective means of implementing the user charges
since billing and collection systems for residential and small non-
residential users (by far the largest group) are already in place through
the Orange County Assessor's and Tax Collector's Offices.
-The charges levied will be proportionate to use among classes of users.
-Under this system industrial users will be charged based on actual use as
required by the regulations and receive credit for applicable taxes paid.
-Tax exempt users will also be charged on a basis relative to use.
Impact of Proposi t.ion 13
Districts' tax rates have been steadily reduced over the years and were dropped
substantially in 1977-78. Even greater cuts were projected for 1979-80 but they
were precluded by the passage of Jarvis-Gann. However, the imposition of Proposition
13 has produced substantial impacts on CSDOC's Revenue Program because
-Proposition 13 reduces considerably the amount of AV' tax revenues the
Districts can expect to receive.
Proposition 13 alters the manner in which assessments are made and taxes
are itemized on the property tax bills.
-The California legislatuTe has indicated that special di.stricts may be
denied their share of ad valorem taxes in future years.
In FY 1978 the Districts received approximately 19 million dollars in AV
revenues while the FY 1979 amount was just over 10 million dollars. This reduction
has altered the Districts' approach for financing capital projects (see Section II)
and also affects CSDOC's approach to OM&R cost recovery. Prior to FY 1979 AV
revenues collected through the operations, maintenance and replacement tax levy
were sufficient not only to meet annual costs but also to establish adequate
general (dry period) and contingency reserves. The reserves are used to meet cash
III-2
• ISi
flow requirements and to provide for extraordinary or emergency maintenance and
repair needs or operational requirements, respectively. Since these· reserves have
already been established at levels sufficient to meet current needs and are carried
over from year to year, any increased requirements projected for FY 1980 will be
nominal and have little impact on OM&R budgets .
. The financial planning foresight of accumulating capital funds for needed sewerage
system construction has minimized the impact of Proposition 13. As pointed out in
Section II the Districts have sufficient reserves on hand to fully fund capital
construction through FY 1984 •.
The Districts are nearing completion of a major trunk sewer program that has
been underway for several years. With the trunk sewer system now nearly complete
and the expectation of receiving a waiver on the full secondary treatment require-
ments, the Districts' capital requirements will be substantially reduced and annual
tax revenues and/or reserves previously appropriated for capital projects may be
shifted to cover OM&R costs. Thus, based on the above, it is currently anticipated
that AV tax revenues from residential/small non-residential users will equal or
exceed this group's OM&R revenue requirements for FY 1980. However, beginning in
· FY 1981, OM&R expenses will exceed revenues based on current estimates (see
Figure 2). The expected FY 1980 revenue surplus will be carried over to FY 1981
and applied to the residential/small non-residential group.
Industrial and tax exempt user groups are charged based on actual use and
receive credit for any taxes paid. Therefore, OM&R rates that are established by
the procedures set forth in this Revenue Program will always be adequate to pay
the proportionate share of such costs for these classes of users.
Plans For UC In The Event AV Taxes Are Insufficient To Pay OM&R
Of course, actual costs and revenues for the five-year period cannot be
accurately determined at this time. Figure 2, Section I, represents CSDOC's current
estimate of income and expenses through 1982-1983.
If residential/small non-residential OM&R costs cannot be met in some future
III-3
...
year either because the rate of cost increases exceeds the rate of revenue increases
or because the State implements legislation discontinuing AV taxes as a source of
revenues to CSDOC, then the Districts may implement one of the following alternatives
for funding the AV tax shortfall:
I. Collect a separate user charge or assessment on the County property tax
bill.
2. Collect via water utilities' billing.
3. Bill users directly by implementation of a separate in-house billing
system.
4. Levy a separate AV tax.
The first three alternatives would add substantially to CSDOC's overhead costs
and these costs would, of course, be passed on to users through a higher user charge.
Also, there are inherent problems in each. Alternatives 1 and. 3 require a major
effort each year to update information obtained fro~ the County Assessor's roll and
turn-around levying of charges for approximately 500;000 separate parcels. Alternative
2 would require development of a uniform agreement and billing system and incorporation
of said system into the procedures of approximately 150 separate water purveyors
within the CSDOC boundaries. There would appear to be a growing reluctance on the
part of the water.utilities to accomodate this method because of the public
relations aspect. The third and most expensive alternative would require purchase
and installation of a large mainframe computer and the ongoing operation and data
base maintenance of such a system. Further, based on the experience of other
agencies, the collection problems associated with this alternative are expected to be
enormous. Alternative 4 requires an election and 2/3 approval of the electorate.
An advantage to alternatives 1-3 is that once unsewered properties are identified
... they could be so coded on the system and the charges reduced or eliminated, as
appropriate, or a procedure for rebates established. The Districts' General Counsel
has ruled that such rebates would not be appropriate under the ad valorem method and
the Boards have adopted a policy reflecting that ruling. Table III-1 more fully
describes the alternatives and the relative issues involved.
III-4
l I I (
Billing Alternative
1. Separate charge .as a
·Special as~essment on
the property tax bill.
I
2. Separate charge collected ..
on water purvetor's utility
billing.
( ( ( l I I
TABLE III-1
(
ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR USER CHARGES WHEN
AV TAXES ARE INSUFFICIENT TO PAY OM&R COSTS
Probable Calculation Method '
( I I I I I
Other Major Relevant Issues
1. Subdivide user classes into sub-
classes such as single family and
multi-family dwellings, office
buildings, small commercial estab-
lishments, etc., and calculate flat
rates attendant to each based on
average discharges and system loading
from representative samplings.
1. (a) Current Statutory authority exists
2. Base charge on water volume
(b) Requires a public hearing and separate
notice of said hearing to all property
.owners.
(c) Utilizes existing -assessor file as data
base and tax bill as billing mechanism.
However, data base would require sub-
stantial annual update at Districts'
expense and conversion to a computer
tape input by Districts to assess
charge on tax bill.
(d) Inaccuracy of Assessor's data base may
resuit in high percent of billing
errors and require a customer service
function.
(e) Unsewered properties· could be reflected
in rate structure once identified and/
or separate provisions made for rebate.
(f) Maximum charge for tax collector's
service is established at.SS/account or
1% of coll~ctions, whichever is greate~
(g) Low delinquency factor.
(h) Cash flow is not spread evenly.
(i) Would satisfy notification requirements
2. (a) Current statutory authority exis-ts.
However, it is permissive, not mandat-
ory fo~ the water utility.
(b) Would not require a public hearing.
(c) Would require contractual arrangements
and system modifications with approx-
imately 150 water purveyors.
(Continued)
l l I I I
Billing Alternative
2. (Cont'd.)
3. Direct billing by CSDOC
l ( l l (_
TABLE III-1 (Cont'd)
Probable Calculation Method
3. Same as 1. above utilizing
assessor's files as the data
base source.
l I l l I ( l I
.
Other Major Relevant Issues
(d) Would require a minimum of data base
maintenance by the Districts as this
would be automatically done by the
water utility. However, separate
arrangements may have to be made with
the utility to reflect loadings of
small commerGial establishments.
(e) Charge more directly associated with
actual use (assuming use is related
to water consumption).
(f) Unsewered properties would have to be
identified and a system exception or
rebate provision made.
(g) High delinquency.
(h) Cost of ·service by utility is unknown
and would have to be negotiated or
established by code amendments.
(i) Cash flow would be more uniform.
(j) Would satisfy notification require-
ments.
3. (a) Current statutory authority exists.
(b) Would require installation of exp~n
si ve computerized billing system and
associated personnel and administra-
tive costs or contracting with an
outside bureau.
(c) Most costly method.
(d) Requires extensive data base main-
maintenance.
(e) Inaccuracy of data base source may
result in high percent of billing
errors.
(Continued)
l l I I
Billing Alternative
3. (Cont'd.)
4. Impose a Separate
AV Tax Levy
I l I I l I l I I I ( I I I
TABLE III-1 (Cont'd)
Probable Calculation Method ·Other Major Relevant Issues
4. Based on property value 4.
(f) Unsewered properties could be reflected
in rate structure once identified and/
or separate provision made for rebate.
(g) Expected delinquency factor would be
highest.
(h) Cash flow impact would be based on
determination of billing frequency.
(i) Would satisfy notification requirements.
(aJ Requires 2/3 voter approval
(b) Unsewered property issue would have to
be resolved
(c) Low delinquency factor
(d) Most cost effective method
(e) Cash flow not sprea~ evenly
(f) Would satisfy notification requirements
(g) Least equitable
...
The timing for implementation of an alternative method will depend on (1) the
pro rata share of revenue from property taxes, (2) carry-over cash balances in each
District, (3) outcome of the ocean waiver application, (4) the alternative method
selected, and (5) i~pact of capital project scheduling and financing.
DISTRICTS' ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
The Districts' operations are accounted for as an enterprise activitY. as
prescribed by the California State Controller's Office Uniform Accounting System
for Waste Disposa.1 Districts, with modifications for an expanded management information
system. Under the enterprise method of accounti~g the Districts' accounts are
maintained on a full accrual basis. ·Revenues are recorded when earned. Expen?es,
including depreciation, are recorded when incurred.
F4nd _Structure
While enterprise accounting requires only a single fund to account for
.. all activities, the Districts utilize a multi-fund approach to facilitate
-
budgeting and reporting a~d for identification and control of source and application
of funds. Historically, in accounting for OM&R activities the Districts have
utilized the following funds and will continue to do so:
-District Operating Funds -Separate enterprise funds are maintained for
each of the seven districts. Each of these funds accounts for the individual
district, OM&R receipts and disbursements, including the individual district's
share of joint operating activities described below.
-Joint Operating Fund (JO) -The accumulation of the accounting data for the
joint operating (joint works treatment and disposal) activity is recorded
in the JO. As noted elsewhere in this plan, these expenses are allocated
to the individual district operating funds at year-end based on flow and
loading.
The furid structure for capital outlays was discussed in Section II.
On a combined basis the district operating funds properly represent the Districts
as one enterprise fund. The above separate budget and accounting for OM&R costs ·is
in full compliance with 40 CFR 3S.929-l(b)(3)(i)(B).
III-8
-
-
-
...
Replacement and Depreciation
In order to understand the Districts' approach to the user charge it is important·
to take into account how CSDOC treats two important elements of OM&R costs, replace-
ment and depreciation.
Replacement in the Districts' OM&R budget (Form 2) consists of expenditures for
. .
obtaining and installing equipment, accessories or appurtenances which are necessary
during the useful life of the treatment works to maintain the capacity and performance
for which the works were designed and constructed. This is in compliance with the
federal definition. It does not include any capital outlay item, that is, any item
that will be capitalized and depreciated. Thus, as discussed in Section II, capital
costs are not an element of the Districts OM&R rates during the next five years,
except as noted for industrial _users. Accordingly, Form 5 showing the allocation of
capital costs to treatment parameters is not included in this Revenue Program.
Depreciation is recognized as an operating cost. Depreciation, however, is
not presently funded as an item in the Districts' budget, and therefore, it is
not passed on to users via the user charge. Inclusion of full depreciation costs,
which are recorded at approximately 6 million dollars a year, in the UC would raise
the rates substan~ially. The revenues, if collected, would be used to establish
reserves for reconstruction of the Districts' facilities at the end of their useful
lives. As pointed out in Section II, on-hand reserves supplemented by a portion of
anticipated connection and annexation fees should be sufficient to meet reconstn1ction
costs over the next five years. Therefore, existing reserves will be used in lieu
of building a separate reserve from funded depreciation. This approach is consistent
with the principle that current users should derive benefit from the payments made
through AV taxes in excess of annual OM&R expenses. At such time that financing
from other sources becomes insufficient to provide what is deemed adequate capital
funds the Districts will establish a capital charge as an element to be added to
the annual user rate.
III-9
-
WORK ORDER SYSTEM
User charge rate calculation consists of ap~lying infor1pation relative to each
user/user groups' discharge by treatment parameter (flow, BOD, SS) to the costs
of collection, treatment and disposal. CSDOC's OM&R costs are sorted by parameter
via the work order system. CSDOC employs a full cost system that applies every
operating expenditure recorded in the general ledger to an open work order. Capital
costs are recorded via the same system but are separated from the operating cost data.
Input
All work order charges are entered via general ledger input documents. Every
entry to the general ledger includes a valid work order number. All charges are
categorized and reported as one of the following:
-Material Charges
-Outside Services
-Labor Charges
Vehicle and Equipment Charges
-Overhead Charges
Ai location
The system initially posts material, outside services, labor and vehicle and
equipment charge~ to a valid operating or capital work order. Overhead is initially
posted to an overhead work order. In subsequent processing the system clears the
overhead work orders and allocates overhead to operating and capital work orders
based on predefined algoritluns.
Reconciliation
The work order report is reconciled in total to the general ledger operating
and expenditure reports and the total of the amounts recorded in the work orders
for the year is reconciled to the total operating and capital expenditures in the
general ledger.
III-10
Work Order System Relationship to User Charges
In order to use the cost data collected via the work order system in determining
user charge rates, the expenses so reported must be accumulated by parameter.
Table III-2 shows the various cost centers and the types of operations to which they
relate. Table III-3 breaks each cost center into a parameter allocation percentage
based on a rationale that is set forth in Appendix B.
In order to determine OM&R costs by parameter the Districts have
-Established a budget/cost center conversion that redistributes CSDOC
budget classifications (wages, salaries & benefits; materials, supplies
& services; etc.) to cost center classifications (individual collection
systems, joint works collection and-diversion systems, etc.)
-Applied parameter allocation percentages from Table III-3 to projected
budget figures for the fiscal year in which rates will be effective.
-Derived costs by parameter.
It should. be noted that replacement costs, amounting to approximately 4% of total
OM&R costs are subtracted out of the total OM&R budget amount before the remaining
96% is converted to cost center classifications. This 4% replacement line item is
then distributed ·to flow, BOD and SS based on a percentage allocation equal to the
combined percentage allocation of the other OM&R cost elements. See Forms 2.0
through 2.2 in Section VII for these preliminary cost estimates for 1979-80.
The resultant costs per treatment parameter will then be used as an input to
the rate calculation formula. Rate calculation is discussed in further detail in
Section IV which includes the formulas used.
III-11
• iml
...
Work Order '
TABLE III-2
IDENTIFICATION OF W9RK ORDERS
AND COST CENTERS
A. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEMS
B .
1. District No. 1 Collection System
2. District No. 2 Collection System
3. District No. 3 Collection System
4. District No. 5 Collection System
5. District No. 6 Collection System
6. District No. 7 Collection System
7. District No. ll Collection System
JOINT WORKS FACILITIES
1. Collection and Diversion System
a. Station Run
b. Subsurface Influent Lines
c. Metering and Diversion Structure
d. Diversion Equipment
e. Pump Station Equipment
f. Pump Station Structures
2. Interplant Interceptor
a. Interplant Interceptor Sec. 1
b. Interplant Interceptor Sec. 2
3. Headworks
a. Bar Screening Equipment
b. Incineration Equipment
c. Grit Equipment
d. General Headworks Equipment
e. General Headworks Structures
f. General Headworks Electrical Power*
4. General Treatment Process
a. Primary Sedimentation Equipment
b. Primary Sedimentation Structures
c. Activated Sludge Equipment
d. Activated Sludge Structures
e. Activated Sludge Electrical Power*
f. Sludge Thickening Equipment ·
g. Sludge Thickening Structures
h. Sludge Thickening Electrical Power*
i. Trickling Filter Equipment
j. Trickling Filter Structures
k. Secondary Sedimentation Equipment
1. Secondary Sedimentation Structures
m. Digestion Equipment
n. Digestion Structures
o. General Treatment Operations
III-12
Cost Center
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-11
B-1
B-1
B-1
B-2
B-3
n-4
B-5
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-5
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-6
B-7
-
....
..
TABLE III-2 (Cont'd)
IDENTIFICATION OF WORK ORDERS
AND COST CENTERS
Work Order
B. JOINT WORKS FACILITIES (Cont'd)
S. Solids Handling-Treatment
a. Solids Handling Equipment
b. Solids Handling Structures
c. Solids Handling Electrical Power*
d. · Sludge Beds
e. Solids Handling Operations
6. Solids Handling-Disposal
a. Solids Disposal Equipment
b. Solids Disposal Structures
c. Solids Disposal Operations
7. Effluent Disinfection
a. Effluent Disinfection Equipment
b. Effluent Disinfection Structures
c. Effluent Disinfection Operations
8. Superviso·ry Control
a. Supervisory Control Equipment
b. Supervisory Control Structure
c. S~pervisory Control Operations
9. Utility Systems
a. Primary Electrical Equipment
b. Secondary Electrical Equipment
c. Electrical System Structures
d. Emergency Generator Equipment
e. Emergency Generator Structures
f. Gas System Equipment
g. Gas System Structures
h. Air System Equipment
i. Water System Equipment
j. Water System Structures
k. Communications Equipment
10. Effluent Disposal
a. Effluent Disposal Equipment
b. Effluent Disposal Structures
c. Effluent Disposal Electrical Power*
d. Subsurface Effluent Lines
III-13
Cost Center
B-6
B-6
B-1
B-8
B-8
B-1
lie
..,
-
_.
Cl
-
Work Order
TABLE III-2 (Cont'd)
IDENTIFICATION OF WORK 'ORDERS
AND COST CENTERS
B. JOINT WORKS FACILITIES (Cont'd)
11. General Plant Complex
a. General Plant Building Equipment
b. General Plant Building Structures
c. Odor Control Equipment
d. Odor Control Operations
e. Grounds Maintenance
f. Record Keeping
g. Training Sessions
h. Public Meetings Information & Display
i. Shuttle Bus and Temporary Warehouse
' 12. General Engineering
a. General Engineering and Drafting
b. Engineering Studies NOC
13. Industrial Waste and Permit
a. In-plant Sampling and Analysis
b. Trunk & Industry Sampling & Analysts
c . Industrial Spill Invest/Mop-Up
14. Laboratory and Research
a. Influent and Effluent Sampling
b. Onshore Bacteria Testing
c. Near Shore Bacteria Testing
d. Ocean Monitoring -NPDES
e. Process Control
f. Lab Quality Control
g. Ocean Research
h. Lab Equipment Maintenance
i. Lab Records
j. Research and Development
*Additions required to the existing work order system.
III-14
Cost Center
B-8
B-8
B-8
B-8
-
-
Cost Center
TABLE III-3
PARAMETER ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES
FOR COST CENTERS
Individual District Collection Systems
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-11
Joint Works Facilities
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-7
B-8
III-15
Parameter Allocation
Percentage
Flow BOD SS
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
35 65
35 20 45
25 so 25
40 60
34 33 33
Overall percent of
each parameter deter-
mined for cost cen-
ters B-1 through B-8.
BILLING SYSTEM
Section I points out that users will be classified according to the system set
forth in 40 CFR 35.929-l(b)(4). Once user charge rates are calculated, they will
t.;;.Q
-
be billed to these ~arious user/user groups as follows:
Residential/Small Non-Residential
Once cost per treatment parameter is established, the rates for each param~ter
will be applied to the total flow, BOD and SS contributions of this class: Present
estimates indicate that the total OM&R costs associated with the treatment of this
group's discharge· will closely approximate the Districts' share of the ad valorem
general levy taxes paid by this group through FY 1980. Collections of these
revenues are via the Districts' share of the ad va1orem tax levy included in the
Orange County Tax Collector's annual property tax statement. Proceeds of the
AV tax general levy are distributed to the Districts by the County based on the ,,.
Districts' historical share of the total general levy AV tax. Since this method
has been in practice only since Proposition 13, estimates of future revenue are
difficult to ascertain at this time. However, it may well be that this source may
fully fund this group's OM&R past FY 1980 unless cut off by legislative action.
Industrial/Conunercial
Users in this category will be billed directly by the Districts at ieast once
a year. Bills will be calculated individually with each user's amount based on
flow, BOD, and SS discharged. Appropriate amounts for each parameter will be derived
from figures supplied by the users. Flow runounts in most cases are substantiated ..
by copies of water bills or by sewage meter readings. BOD and SS figures are verified
by an industry's self-monitoring report through its' own laboratory or an inde-
pendent laboratory, inspe~tions by District officials and parameter figures
based on Standard Industrial Classifications. The Districts periodically verify
the data as· part of their industrial source control and monitoring program.
After an industrial user's group charge is calculated based on its' actual
use figure, the total amount billed to ea·ch industrial user wi 11 reflect the actual
III-16
cost of collecting, treating and disposing of that user's discharge. ·The user
will receive credit for the ad valorcm property taxes paid (except for debt
service) and be billed the net amount.
Tax Exempt/Governmental/Institutional
Federal and State agencies and other applicable tax exempt users as provided
for in 40 CFR 35.929-l(b)(4)(iii) will be billed directly by the Districts at
least once a year on the basis of actual use. For users in this category that
discharge only sanitary wastes, billings will be based on the number of individuals
employed at the agency's facilities. Rates will be based on a standard number of
gallons per· employee at a standard sanitary waste strength.
Tax exempt users that discharge other than equivalent domestic wastewater
will be billed directly based on actual use. Paying no taxes, such institutions,
of course, receive no credits.
Based on the best information available to date·there are no institutions
receiving "substantial" ad valorem tax credits. If such users are identified and
it is determined that said users are not paying their proportionate share of OM&R
costs as residential/small non-residential dischargers, they will be billed as set
forth above with a credit for that amount of AV tax the user does pay which is
allocable to the Districts.
Pursuant to the federal regulations, local (other than federal and state) tax
exempt users discharging only domestic waste are not subject to user charges. This
virtually eliminates all such local agencies from the provisions of this Revenue
Program, with few exceptions.
INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY SYSTEM DESIGN
The Districts' ICR system is designed to recover that portion of Federal grants
attributable to the cost of constructing treatment works for the industrial users' ..
capacity. The ICR design is described in four parts:
III-17
-
-
-Preliminary rate determination
-Rate calculation
-Cash Control and Funds Management
-Billing
Preliminary Rate Calculation
The purpose of this part of the ICR system design is to determine the ICR
unit rate by wastewater characteristic. In calculating individual user charges
these unit rates will be multiplied by each industrial user's flow/loading
figures. Preliminary rates require both accounting and engineering inputs. The
former will be used as a source for determining the total grant-funded cost of the
facilities for which industrial costs are being recovered and the anticipated
useful life of each component. Fixed asset records will be used to determine the
... final £igures. In order to ensure that the required information is available the
Districts will adhere to the following procedures:
1.
2.
Successful bidders for construction of treatment facilities will be
required to provide estimates of construction costs and useful liv.es
of treatment facility components.
Verify above with staff on consulting engineering unput.
3. Treatment facility component construction costs and useful life estimates
will be maintained in the Districts' fixed asset accounting records.
Engineering inputs in the form of design specifications are required to determine
design capacities for ICR purposes. Individual ~nd group users' flow and load
characteristics are either estimated or taken directly from the industrial ~ser
portion of the data base. Design specifications are also used to determine the
expected life of the treatment works.
Federal grant amounts subject to ICR are recovered ·from the industrial users
over 30 years or the life of the treatment works, whichever is less. The useful
life of the CSDOC joint treatment works for Revenue Program purposes is 30 years.
As additional grant-funded facilities are constructed, ICR rates will be
changed to reflect the additional grant funds to be recovered.
I II-18
-
...
Rate Calculation
Set forth more specifically in Section IV, individual rate calculation
requires
-Determination of preliminary or per-characteristic rates.
-An !CR data base including industrial users as defined in 40 CFR 35.905.
(CSDOC will exclude domestic wastes at the rate of 20 gallons per employee
per day in determining whether or not a discharger is an industrial user
for ICR purposes.
-Applying each industrial user's flow, BOD and SS loadings for a year to
1/30 of the grant-fundable cost per characteristic.
For purposes of ICR calculation, design capacity is equal to the average
annual design flow and loading of the treatment facilities as described in Appendix C.
Cash Control & Funds Management
To ensure that continuous control is exercized. over !CR payments, the Districts
will maintain a daily ICR cash journal to supplement·existing accounts receivable
records. All receipts will be posted to an ICR fund to be established by the
. . ,,: ... :. ··"':~~. .. . .
.-· · ·· ... ···nfS'iricts upon implementation of the ICR system. The funds will be deposited
with the County Treasurer for investment in instruments specifically allowed by
40 CFR 35.928-2:
-Obligations of the U.S. Government.
-Obligations ·guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its' agencies .
-Accounts fully collaterized by U.S. Government obligations.
A quarterly summary cash receipt and investment report will segregate !CR
payment and investment activity by grant and allow the Districts to monitor
collection and investment activity.
An annual analysis will be performed by CSDOC to determine the amount to be
paid to EPA and to be invested. Disbursements will be in accordance with
40 CFR 35.928-2(a). Specifically:
-SO percent of ICR payments together with any interest earned thereon will
be returned to the Federal Government annually.
III-19
-Of the remaining 50 percent
-A portion may be used to pay the incremental costs of ICR system
administration in which case said cost~ must be segregated from all other
administrative costs. This amount will not be known until ICR admini-
strative costs can be determined during the first year of implementation.
-At least 80 percent of the amount retained after paying the incremental
costs of administration will be used for the costs of expansion,
upgrading or reconstruction of the treatment works, allowable by
Federal regulations and necessary to meet the requirements of the Clean
Water Act of 1977.
-The remainder of the ret.ained amounts will be used as determined by
CSDOC's Boards of Directors except that they may not be used for
construction of industrial pretreatment facilities or rebates to
industrial users for costs incurred in complying with UC or ICR
requirements.
I~pl~mentation of the ICR system will place an additional administrative burden
on the Districts' accounting and industrial waste staffs. Maintenance and revision
_. of the industrial user data base will require continuing attention. In addition,
monitoring of investments~ payments to EPA and other analytical. work will also
increase administrative costs.
Billing
After individual rate calculations are made annually by the Districts, ICR
charges will be.billed directly. Bills will be issued at least once a year in
conjunction with the direct UC billing.
Flow Charts
Figures 3 and 4 depict the user charge and ICR systems in flow charts.
III-20
l I l I l ( ( I
SOURCE INPUTS
1-Pg~g~~~El I & ~%~~~I~E
I MATERIAL ~ CHARGES ,.__ __ l REQUISITIONS I
i ______ ··-· .. ____I ..... -·-----.:
1 1----
TIMECARDS L__j LABOR I 'I CHARGES
i--
'
.____,__ _ _...:! l_ __ _J
I CHARGEOUT
! TICKETS
I VEHICLE
j >i EQUI:MENT
! __ ~~~~~~-=---L _____ _,
r·-.. -----·-~REDETER~ ), OVERHEAD
I MINED 1
1
CHARGES RATES
ENGINEERING
INPUT-
FLOW/LOAD
DATA FOR
EACH COST
CENTER -
··---··----J
-' ----
( (
FIGURE 3
USER CHARGE SYSTEM
ANALYSIS
COLLECT
BY
WORK .
ORD;~ I ~-~~~:~
~I
SUMMARIZJl
ALL
COST CENTERS
BY
:_~w~-LOAD I
~-
DISTRIBUTE
COSTS
TO USERS
USING UNIT
RATES BY
CHARACTERISTIC
l ( l [ l I I l l
BILLINGS
' BILL
/ USERS
(
I
I I I I (
SOURCE INPUTS
i
FIXED ASSET FEDERAL GRAt'IT RECORDS/ENG IN-, AMOUNTS RELATED EERING COST / TO !CR PROJECTIONS
I
ENGINEERING INDUSTRIAL USERS
DESIGN SPECS/ ' VOLUME/LOAD
INDUSTRIAL / REQUIREMENTS
DATA BASE (ANNUAL BASIS)
1 · I
I l l (
FIGURE 4
!CR SYSTEM
ANALYSIS.
i
DETERMINE ICR DESIGN JI
CAPACITY & UNIT COSTS ' / OF CONSTRUCTION BY:
. -FL[_JOW
I
-BOD
-SS '----
(
BILLINGS
s '---·-· • ---~-··· , I ····-~-·---------
l . I l l
·CASH CONTROL/
. FUNDS MANAGEMENT
I I I
SUGGESTED
REPORTS
l
______ ..µ I
ENGINEERING H FACILITY LIFE:~ DIVIDE !CR UNIT COSTS I i ~ --------1
DESIGN 'LESSER OF USEFU ·, BY FACILITY USEFUL M MULTIPLY ANNUAL RATES
SPECIFICATIONS .1 LIFE OR 30 YEAR ~· LIFE TO DETERMINE I TIMES INDIVIDUAL/GROUPI
ANNUAL CAPITAL COST 1 USERS' FLOWS/LOADS
RECOVERY RATES BY L____
FLOW/BOD/SS I
----------·· --~----
'1 PREPARE QUARTERLY
BILLINGS BY COMPANY
I BY WASTEWATER CHAR-
ACTERISTIC _I
~-=:~.~~[, -~ -~--~·=
I MAIL BILLS TO l
INDUSTRIAL USERS i
L_ ______ --T ---·······---1
!
-PETAIL BILLING REPORT
-SUMMARY BILLING REPOR1
BY GRANT (QTR)
-DAILY CASH JOURNAL
-SUMMARY RECEIPTS/ {JDf~~t~-~E~~~;Nt-~,---...
---SH CONTROL RECORDS DISBURSEMENTS BY
GRANT BY GRANT __ ...:~...:==~~----------==--..... brOST INVESTMENT I
IVITY TO IN.'VESTMENT 1
1 ECORDS BY GRANT --·-·-·--·----·-___ _...
G:OST-·su~~IARY--ICR-1
OME/EPA PAYMENT
I TO RECEIPTS/DISBURSE-
! MENTS SUMMARY LOG . . .. ---------
-INVESTMENT POSTING
LIST
-sm~IARY REPORT
(ANNUAL)
:-DISTRIBUTE ~CR REVENU.ES.. -REVENUE SOURCES/USES
' · · --· . · ··-· . SUMMARY REPORT :-:rR~Ncfi!~· P~US' i TO I~~ FUND --1 · ( ~:s~%F~~D-~-I
Ii INTEREST TO EPA~! REINVEST IN I [GENERAL REVENUES
__ ··-· ________ __l-~~STRICTED INVE5.1'M~NT~-~-LE~-IB~~ ~~~~~
IV. RATE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ...
This section of the Revenue Program defines the methodology for development of
inputs and calculations of the Districts' user charge and industrial cost recovery
rates. -
Rate Structures ...
At present CSDOC has received EPA and SWRCB grant funds subject to Revenue
... Pl;'ogram requirements for its joint works treatment and disposal facilities only.
While individual district (collection and transmission system) OM & R expense will ..
be recovered via the user charge, no ICR rates will apply to these nongrant-funded
facilities. The ICR rate, therefore, is single-tier, applying only to certain joint
works treatment facilities.
User charge rates will be two-tiered. There will be one level of rates for
collection systems with seven individually calculated rates, one for each District,
and a s.econd tier the joint works treatment rate, the elements of which are the same
for all of the Districts and, thus, for all· users. The joint works treatment rate is -made up of ra"t.es for each wastewater characteristic. All such rates are entirely
flow related. Any user's total rate will be a combination of the collection rate
for .,he District in which the user is located and the joint works rate. The UC rate
structure is as depicted below:
User Charge
Rate Element Q (flow) BOD SS
Joint Works ... (Treatme~t Disposal) $ /MG $ -------/1000 lbs $ __ _._/_IO_O_O_l_b_s
District (Collection) $ /MG N/A N/A
Combined $ /MG $ /1000 lbs -------$ __ __,/_l_O_O_O _l_b_s
IV-1
.....
...
-
User Charge Rate Calculation
Section III of the Revenue Program describes how the Districts' work order system
accumulates OM & R expenses by cost center. Each cost center has been assigned a
parameter allocation.percentage. By applying these percentages to the accumulated
expenses per cost center, the total expense per parameter can be derived. The per-
centage of total OM & R costs that each parameter represents can then be applied to
the upcoming year's budget figures. This results in a total cost for each wastewater
cha~acteristic for the budget year.
For FY 1980 the Districts will apply the parameter allocation results of the
work order system for the preceding year against ~dopted budget figures in order to
determine for each District its total cost for collection, which is entirely flow-
related. The same method will be used to produce the joint treatment works cost for
each of Q, BOD and SS.
The individual District's costs will then be divided by the total flow figures
per District from appropriate Form l's to ascertain each District's Q rate in
$ /MG_.
The joint works cost for flow will be divided by the total flow from all
Districts to determine the joint works Q.rate in$ /MG.
BOD and SS rates are similarly derived by dividing total joint works ·cost for
each of these parameters by the total number of pounds of each as determined by
adding the contributions of all users from all DistTicts. The resultant BOD and
SS rates will be shown in $ /1000 lbs. -------
The means of deriving the rates mentioned above can be shown by the·following
formulas:
District OM & R Rate .($ /MG) ____ _,,
Joint Works Unit Flow Rate ($
Districts'· Budgeted OM & R Costs
= · Di~tricts ! Total Annual Flow
/MG) __ JW Rudgeted Flow-Related OM & R Costs
Total Annual Flow
IV-2
-
-
-
-
Joint Works Unit BOD Rate ($
Joint Works Unit SS Rate ($
/1000 JW Budgeted BOD-Rclated
0
0M & R Costs lbs)= ~-----=----~~~~~~~~-'-----~~
/1000 lbs) = JW Budgeted SS-Related OM & R Costs
Total Annual SS Loading
In deriving the budgeted costs, carryover from the preceding fiscal year is applied
to reduce the costs to be recovered.
Determination of Individual/Group User Charges
Calculation of actual user charges will be accomplished· as follows:
1. Residential/Non-residential Users ~ In· any given District the total
· flow figures of all users in this· group will be multi plied by the
rate to ascertain the individual District's revenue requirements
from this class. Total flow/loading for all of the Districts' users
will then be multiplied by the ra~es for Q, BOD, and SS to determine
joint works treatment requirements for residential/small .non-residential
users in that District. The total of all individual District require-
ments plus the total joint works treatment share requlrements of all
Districts for this class will equal the total residential/small non-
residential requirement for CSDOC. This amount must be recovered
from the share of ad valorem tax revenues. At such time that costs
exceed revenue, an alternative method, as discussed in Section 3,
will be implemented.
2. Industrial/Commercial -The individual District and joint works
treatment rates will be applied to the appropriate flow/loading
figures for each user to derive that user's individual user charge
for the year. A credit will be given for related property taxes
paid. Following is an illustration of the formula:
IV-3
·--
·-
District Unit Flow Rate ($ /MG) X User Q = Collection Charge $ -----
+ JW Unit Flow Rate {$ /MG) X User Q = JW Flow Charge $ -----
+ JW Unit BOD Rate ($ /1000 lbs) X User BOD = JW BOD Charge ---$ -----
+ JW Unit SS Rat~ ($ /1000 lbs) X User SS = JW SS Charge $ ____ _
EQUALS TOTAL USER CHARGE
Less: Property Taxes Paid
(Exclusive of Debt Service)
EQUALS NET CHARGE
$ -----
$ ____ _
3. Tax Exempt -For tax exempt users that discharge other than domestic
waste, charges will be calculated in the same manner as industrial/
commercial. For others subject to a charge, .. it will be calculated
individually by multiplying the average number of building occupants
times the rate established per person. Federal and State office
buildings will be calculated on the basis of 20 GPD per employee
at a strength of 240 miligrarns per liter BOD and SS. The rates
will be derived from summing the Q, BOD and SS for this group of
users and applying to the system costs in the same manner as for
other groups and then developing the unit rates pursuant to the
preceding assumptions.
Proportionality
Since the same unit rates for each parameter are applied against flow/loading
figures for each user/user group, the resultant user charges will be proportionate
to use among groups. Individual industrial/conunercial and tax exempt user charges
will be proportionate to each other and.to the residential/small non-residential
group.
ICR Rate Calculation
As previously noted, ICR rates apply only to grant-funded facilities, i.e.,
C-06-0779, the 46 MGD upgrade. Thus, there is no difference in rate from District
to District.
IV-4
-
...
Rates are calculated as follows:
1. The grant-funded portion of the facility is determined.
2. Based on engineering criteria, the costs are allocated to wastewater
characteristics, resulting in a life-of-facility (30 years) cost for
each characteristic.
3. Each per-characteristic cost is divided by 30 in order to determine
total annual ICR recovery cost per characteristic.
4. · Each annual cost per characteristic is divided by the total CSDOC
flow/loading figures for the upcoming year from the data base.
This results in a rate per millio~ gallons for flow or thousand
pounds for BOD and SS .
ICR rate calculation can be shown in the following formula:
Annual ICR Rate (Flow) = Grant-funded Flow-related Costs/30 Years = $ /MG
Total Annual Flow in MG -----
Annual ICR Rate (BOD) Grant-funded BOD-related Costs/30 Years = Total Annual BOD in 1000 lbs. = .$ ______ /_l_O_OO_l_b_s_.
Annual ICR Rate (SS) = Grant-funded SS-related Costs/JO Years = $ /lOOO lbs.
Total Annual SS in 1000 lbs. ------~~~-
Determination of Individual ICR Charges
The per-characteristic rates so derived will then be applied to industrial users'
annual contribution in terms of flow, BOD, and SS to determine ICR charges to each
'-' .user for each characteristic. A user's total ICR charge for a year will be the total
of Q, BOD, and SS charges for that year.
An individual industrial users ICR charge can be determined using the following
formula:
ICR Rate (Flow) x Industrial Users' Q (MG) = Flow Charge $ ..
+ ICR Rate (BOD) x Industrial Users' BOD (1000 lbs) = BOD Charge $
+ ICR Rate (SS) x Industrial Users' SS (1000 lbs) = SS Charge $
= Individual Industrial User's Total ICR Charge $ -Detailed procedures for calculating all user rates appear in the Districts'
-accounting procedures manuals.
IV-5
V. REVENUE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
This section discusses how the UC/ICR systems will be implemented in terms of
rates, billings, no~ification procedures, data base development, ordinance modifi-
.-cations, computer system development and inter-agency agreements. Summarized below
-
is the implementation schedule.
REVENUE PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
R/P & Ordinance Considera-
tions and Hearings 0---
R/P Consideration by SWRCB
R/P Becomes Effective •
Budget Process
~· .
Establish UC/ICR Rates •
Notification to Users •
Ongoing Data Base
Refinement •
Accounting System
Enhancement Implementation 0
Inter-Agency Agreement
Modifications •
CONCURRENT CONSIDERATIONS
Consolidation
UC/ICR Rates
July 1, 1979, is the effective date of the Revenue Program. However, Congress
has placed a moritorium on the ICR provisions until a study and determination is
made on whether it should be implemented, modified or dropped. A decision is sup-
posed to be forthcoming prior to July 1st. Pending the outcome, the Districts' plans
are as follows:
V-1
D
~
~
1)
..
-
If ICR payments are imposed by Congress, ICR rates as shown on Form 8
will be billed to individual users prior to the end of the fiscal year.
If the moratorium is extended past July 1st under the same guidelines
as are set forth in 40 CRF 35.928-4, the Districts will nonetheless
monitor flows, calculate rates, and so inform industrial users of
the charge. However, as provided in subparagraph (b) of the moratorium
provision, the Districts will defer payments from industrial users so
as to avoid the possibility of having to make rebates.
If ICR is discontinued, the Districts will not implement the system.
UC Rates
Actual UC rates, as pointed out in Section I, cannot be calculated until final
FY 1980 OM & R budget figures are determined. Once the budget is adopted final rate
calculations will be made and implemented as follows:
Total revenue requirements for the residential/small non-residential
user class will be calculated and compared to that class' revenue
contribution via the 1% ad valorem tax. Revenues and costs are
expected to be about equal. If, however, AV revenues exceed require-
ments, the surplus will be noted and carried over to offset possible
deficits in subsequent years. In case of a deficit in FY 1980, general
reserves will be used to make up the shortfall. The deficit will be
noted and recovered in FY 1981 via a supplementary tax charge or
direct billing (See· ttAlternativ·e Plans for Inadequate AV .Revenues"
in Section III). Billings for this class will be annual via the
property tax bill.
The user charge billing for industrial/commercial users will be made
not less frequently than annually. Current billings to such users
are quarterly. However, consideration is still being given to an
alternative semi-annual or annual billing.
Annual bills will be sent to tax exempt users. Such billings will
probably not occur until late in the fiscal year since it may take
several months to refine this portion of the data base.
V-2
-
Notification
40 CFR 35.929-2(f) requires that:
"each user must be notified at least annually in conjunction .
with a regular bill of the rate and that portion of the user
charges or ad valorem taxes which are attributable to wastewater
treatment services."
In the case of industrial/commercial and tax exempt users such notification will
be accomplished via the regular user charge bill. That bip will show the total
charge· for the user's portion of OM & R costs and also show the credit applied to
that charge for the amount of AV taxes the user has paid. Since !CR charges will
be listed separately for !CR users and since no other charges will be listed on the
bill, the user charge will be totally attributable to wastewater treatment.
In the case of residential/small non-residential users the portion of AV taxes
attributable to wastewater treatment will be that portion of the 1% general AV tax
levy distributed to the Districts by the County. Individual users will be notified
of the percentage of the total general 1% levy taxes that are to be distributed to
the Districts.
This notification will be accomplished using one of three methods:
1. The information will be printed on the face of the County property
tax bill.
2. The information will be printed on an insert to be included with
the County property tax bill.
3. The Districts will separately mail the information to each
residential/small non-residential user within 30 days after
County property tax bills are mailed.
Data Base Refinement
The Districts' data base (see Form 1) will be refined over the next two to
three years and updated annually thereafter. The goals of the refinement of the
data base are shown below in the order of priority:
V-3
-
1. Define per employee sanitary waste flow and load contributions for
the industrial and tax exempt categories.
2. Determine number of units and employees per unit for the tax exempt
user class.
3. Define single family residential unit waste flow and load contributions.
4. Identify and classify all non-residential users which discharge greater
than 25,000 gallons per day or equivalent domestic waste and/or
, contribute toxic pollutants.
5. Identify all non-residential users and classifr according to waste
strength (i.e. strong, moderate and weak).
The existing CSDOC permit system identifies all major industrial users including
those that discharge toxic pollutants. In addition, current permittees include
commercial bakeries, industrial and commercial laundries, soft water services,
large amusement parks, major universities and colleges, State hospitals, and
Federal military installations. As a consequence future additions to the existing
permit system will center around the inclusion of certain commercial classifications
not yet identified. At a minimum, the following classifications of users will be
developed:
-Car Washes
-Laundromats
-Hotels and Motels with Dining Facilities
-Restaurants (dine on premises)
-All other Industrial/Commercial Users Discharging
Domestic Type Waste
The first th:ree goals of the data base refinement listed above are scheduled
to occur prior to Revenue Program implementation in the summer-of 1979.
The process of identification of users within each classification which dis-
charge greater than 25,000 GPD of equivalent sanitary waste will occur subsequent
to Revenue Program implementation and will include the following:
V-4
-Determine the average waste characteristics for each classification
via actual sampling within the CSDOC servi'ce area.
-Determine the flow unit for each class of users which equates to
25,000 GPD o~ domestjc waste.
-Identify and permit each user which discharges greater than 25,000
GPD of equivalent domestic waste.
-Give notice and meet with affected user groups.
It is currently estimated that there are up to 2,000 industrial/commercial users
which.discharge greater than 25,000 GPO of equivalent domestic waste within the
CSDOC service area which are not currently operating under permits. It will take·
two to three years to identify them. As these users are identified, they will be
reclassified from residential/small non-residential group to the industrial/commercial
group. The identification and classification of all non-residential users according
to waste strength will occur after the users which discharge greater than 25,000
GPD of equivalent domestic waste have been identified.
Ordinance Modifications
40 CPR Part 35 requires a grantee to adopt an ordinance that:
-Prohibits new sources of inflow.
-Insures proper design and construction of new facilities.
-Establishes the user charge system.
-Establishes the industrial cost recovery system.
The Districts• existing sewer connection use ordinance will require amendments
to fully comply with UC/ICR regulations. The required modifications are set forth
~ in a separate anaylsis. The draft modifications to the ordinance are in process,
and a proposed ordinance will be considered for adoption by the Boards of Directors
after July I, 1979. The planned time for CSDOC Boards of Directors action is the
first half of fiscal year 1979-80.
V-5
Computer System Development
TI1e Districts have undertaken a comprehensive accounting system enhancement
program with the objectiv~ of meeting all their financial and management informa-
tion requirements over the next five years in the most cost-effective manner. Among
the numerous requirements taken into consideration, those of the Districts' Revenue
Program have been central to the system design. Accordingly, the system design
provides for the following Revenue Program related requirements:
-Full cost work order/cost center accounting supported by a cost
allocation module.
-ICR and UC billing and receivable.
-Fixed Asset ledger maintaining ICR asset eligibility percentages,
-Fund and account structure fully consistent with Revenue Program
requirements.
The system implementation plan calls for a three-phase implementation beginning
July 1, 1979, and concluding prior to the close of the calendar year. The phases
and their associated systems are:
Phase 1 -July 1, 1979
-Payroll
-Labor Distribution
-Accounts Payable
-Cost Allocation
-Budget Preparation
-General Ledger Accounting
-Appropriation/Expenditure/Revenue/Accounting
-Work Order/Cost Center Accounting
-Phase 2 -October 1, 1979
-Equipment Billing
-Purchasing
-Inventory
-Fixed Assets
Phase 3 -November 1, 1979
-ICR/UC Billing and Receivable
V-6
The timing of the implementation phases has been set to fully support the cost
collection and revenue requirements of the Revenue.Program which becomes operational
on July 1, 1979.
Inter-Agency Agreements
The Districts have inter-agency agreements with eig~t other districts for pro-
vision of sewage conveyance, treatment and/or disposal services. During the develop-
ment of the CSDOC Revenue Program these eight agreements were reviewed to determine
the applicability of EPA and SWRCB regulations to these agreements. Four of the
eight agreements (1 through 4) involved are considered insignificant in terms of
discharge to the system or are not yet connected to the system and, therefore, do
not require further consideration at this time. The other four (5 through 8) will
require modifications over the next year to enable full compliance with the Revenue ,,,.
Program regulations. The agencies and the t)'pes of services involved are summarized
below:
AGENCY
1. Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority,
Riverside, CA
2. Irvine Ranch Water
District, Irvine,
CA
3. City of Long Beach,
CA
TYPE OF SERVICE
CSDOC will provide convey-
ance, treatment and disposal
of up to 30 MGD of SAWPA
high saline wastewater.
Agreement provides SAWPA
with capacity rights in
CSDOC facilities.
CSDOC provides 15 MGD of
capacity in its ocean
outfall to IRWD.
CSDOC provides conveyance,
treatment and disposal
services for @ 93,600 GPO
of wastewat~r from a 19
acre residential develop-
ment in Long Beach.
V-7
STATIJS OF SERVICE
EPA/SWRCB funding for
upper reaches of Santa
Ana Regional Interceptor
(SARI) is being sought.
Not yet connected to
CS DOC
Not yet connected to
CSDOC.
Service has been opera-
tional since 1972. Dis-
charge considered
insignificant.
AGENCY
4. Sandalwood Sewer
Maintenance District,
Los Angeles County
5. Sunset Beach
Sanitary District,
Sunset Beach, CA
(City of Huntington
· Beach)
6. Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
(LACSD) #18
7. Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
(LACSD) #19
8. Orange County Water
District, Fountain
Valley, CA
TYPE OF SERVICE
CSDOC 113 provides convey-
ance, treatment and dis-
posal services to this 17
acre residential area in
a geographically isolated
area of southeastern Los
Angeles County.
CSDOC provides 250,000
GPD of conveyance treat-
ment and disposal services
to SBSD which serves resi-
dential and commercial
dischargers in Coastal
Orange County.
Approximately 212 million
gallons of LACSD #18 and
#19 wastewater is conveyed
to, treated and disposed of
via CSDOC facilities annually;
approximately 153 million
gallons of CSDOC #3 waste-
water is conveyed to, treated
and disposed of via LACSD
facilities annually.
The CSDOC/OCWD agreement
provides for 15 MGD of
secondary treatment waste-
water to be delivered to
OCWD; and an equal amount
of brine from the OCWD to
CSDOC for discharge via
CSDOC 1 s disposal facilities.
V-8
STATUS OF SERVICE
This service has been
operational since the
late 1960's. Discharge
considered insignificant.
Service has been opera-
tional since 1970.
The services have been
operational since the
early 1960's.
CSDOC currently provides
10 MGD of secondary treated
wastewater to OCWD, and
OCWD returns limited
amounts of brine to CSDOC.
OCWD is currently in Step
1 of their Green Acres
project, which will require
an additional 15 MGD of
·wastewater from CSDOC and
an equal amount of dis-
posal capacity via CSDOC
facilities. A joint com-
mittee of Directors has
this agreement under study.
l 1 w
u
D
0
u
·--' I u
u
.o
LI
u
Q
lJ
0
u
u
0
0
u
VI • APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Covornor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
... DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
-
-
-
-
-
...
P. O. BOX 100 o SACRAMENTO 95801
(916) 445-7971
AUG Cr 1 .. 1 3
Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester
Dire~tor of Finance
County Sanitation Districts
of Or_ange Coupty
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
In Reply Ref er
To:· 552:DP
USER CHARGE SYSTEM BASED ON AD VALOREM TAXES; COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, PROJECT NO. C-06-1073
Based on your letter dated July 21, 1978, Division staff has determined
that the County Sanitation Districto of Orange County have a dedicated ad
valorem tax system in compliance with Section 35.929(b)(1) through (b)(3)
of EPA's Interim Regulations dated April 25, 1978.
Therefore, in accordance with Section 35.935-13(a) of the Interi.m Regulations,
any Step 3 payments being withheld at 50 or 80 percent for failure to comply
with the requirements for development or approval of a user charge system
are released. You shall obtain approval of your user charge system by
June 30, 1979. An ad valorem-based user charge system may be approved if
it meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) through (b)(?) of Section
35.929-1 (Attachment). Requirements (b)(1) through (b)(3) have a;Lready
been met.
If you have further questions regarding development of an ad valorem-based
user charge system, please contact Donald Perrin of my staff at (916)322-6457.
J/i~~-;7¥£<'
~,./ Neil Dunham r Division Chief
Manager -Clean Water Grant Program
Attachment
APPENDIX B.
JUSTIFICATION OF PARAMETER ALLOCATION.
PERCENTAGES FOR COST CENTERS
Cost centers have· been identified for each of the seven separate district
wastewater collection systems and the joint works work order numbers appli-
cable to coounon percentages of Flow, BOD, and SS. Allocations of system
expenditures between these three parameters were based on design criteria,
unit loadings, removal efficiencies, and other factors associated with costs
necessary to construct, operate, and/or maintain the wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal system. Justification of the parameter allocation
percentages developed for each work order and consequently used in the deter-
mination of cost centers are described in the following .paragraphs.
. .
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEMS
The collection and interceptor systems of the seven separate districts which
comprise the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are designed en-
• tirely on a relative wastewater flow basis. Consequently, since the volume of
wastewater discharged is the basic consideration of such piping systems, costs
associated with . collection and interceptor facilities have been allocated
entirely to flow.
JOINT WORKS FACILITIES
Collection and Diversion System
Facilities contained in the joint works collection and diversion system
include influent lines, metering and diversion structures, pump station
equipment, and pump station structures. All of these facilities are
installed for the purpose of metering, selecting, and diverting wastewater
flow to one of two D.istrict treatment plants. Relative sewage flow is the
prime consideration pertaining to capital and annual operating expenditures
of the system.
Interplant Interceptor
Capital and operating costs associated with the interplant interceptor
system are tot~lly applicable to wastewater flow on the same basis as the
individual district collection and joint works collection and diversion
systems.
Headworks
The headworks facilities include screening, grit removal, and pumping
processes. The purpose of the facility is to receive sewage flows into the
treatment system and remove large solids and debris. Due to the fact that
much of the material removed from the headworks is too large to be measured
as "suspended", and that costs associated with the removal of such material
at the hcadworks is small in proportion to the total, headworks expendi-
tures arc allocated 100 percent to flow.
....
..
APPENDIX B
2.
General Treatment Process
Primary Sedimentation Equipment
Primary sedimentation equipment is required for the removal of BOD and
SS. From historical District data, 35 percent BOD and 64 percent SS
removal is accomplished in the primary sedimentation process. Convert-
ing these percent removals to a portion of 100 percent yields:
35 x 100 = 35% BOD
99
64 x 100 = 65% SS
99
99 100%
Therefore, primary sedimentation equipment is 35 and 65 pe~cent appli-
cable to BOD and SS, respectively.
Primary Sedimentation Structures
Wastewater flow is the basic· design consideration in sizing a primary
sedimentation structure. However, costs cannot be entirely allocated to
flow since the prime purpose of the structure is the removal of BOD and
suspended solids. On this basis it is assumed that one-third of the
structure is applicable to flo~, the other two-thirds pertaining to BOD
and suspended solids in proportion to percent removals.
Flow = 33%
BOD 67% x 0.35 = 23%
SS 67% x 0.65 = 44%
Therefore, rounding off, primary sedimentation structures are 35%, 20%
and 45% applicable to Flow, BOD, and SS, respectively.
Activated Sludge Equipment and Power
Activated ·sludge equipment is designed primarily on the basis of. BOD
loadings. Nevertheless, the activated sludge process· is required to
remove suspended solids remaining after primary sedimentation to assure
compliance with waste discharge requirements. Anticipated percent
removals of BOD and SS by the activated sludge system are 91 percent and
85 percent, respectively. Therefore, based on removal efficiencies
only, the percent applicability of BOD and SS would be:
91 x 100 = 52% BOD
176
85 x 100 = 48% SS
176
176 100%
......
...
-
APPENDIX B
3.
However, it has been assumed that an additional 15 percent of related
facility costs is applicable to BOD due to the basis of design. The
resulting overall BOD and SS percentages are as follows:
BOD = 15 + 85(.52)
SS = 85( .48)
= 59%
::: 41%
Rounding off, 60 percent BOD and 40 percent SS are obtained.
Activated Sludge Structures
Like activated sludge equipment, the design of activated sludge struc-
tures is based primarily on BOD. However, flow is a consideration in
that if the waste were very weak (diluted by flow), detention time would
be a definite design criteria. In addition, although BOD is the prime
loading consideration, the system must also remove SS to enable the
Districts to meet waste discharge requirements. Thus, cos ts to Flow,
BOD, and SS were given the following priority:
25% Flow ·only
25% BOD only
50% BOD and SS
If the portion of costs applicable to both BOD and SS are allocated to
each based on the percent removal of each parameter, the following
overall percentages are obtained:
Flow = 25%
BOD = 25 + 50(0.52) = 51%
SS = 50(0.48) = 24%
Therefore, allocations of 25 percent flow, 50 percent BOD, and 25
percent SS are used.
Sludge Thickening Equipment, Structures, and Power
The purpose of sludge thickening is to concentrate BOD generated sludge
and SS removed in the secondary treatment process. The design crite~ia
used for sizing the sludge thickening facilities is 0.75 lbs. of total
solids per pound of BOD removed in the activated sludge process. This
sludge production rate includes the related SS removal in the aeration
system. However, some of the SS entering the aerator also exert a BOD •
For every 100 million gallons of wastewater flow, the total solids
produced equals 128, 070 lbs. The total amount of SS removed in the
activated sludge process per 100 million gallons of wastewater equals
100,660 lbs. Assuming 50 percent of the SS entering the aerator are
actually BOD:
SS = (100,660)(0.5) = 50,330 lbs.
BOD= 128,070 ~-50,330 = 77,740
128,070 lbs.
-
-
....
APPENDIX B
4.
Percentages can be calculated as follows:
BOD ::: 77,740 x 100 =
128 ,070
SS ::I 50,330 x 100 =
128,070
Therefore, allocations of 60 percent BOD
used.
Trickling Filter Equipment
61%
39%
and 40 percent SS have been
~he existing trickling filters at Plant No. 1 provide part of the
overall percent removal of BOD and SS described for the activated sludge
process. Because the trickling filters are an integral part of the
design and operation of the activated sludge facilities at Plant No. 1,
the allocation percentages which apply for activated sludge equipment
also apply to the trickling filter equipment.
Trickling Filter Structures
The same allocation percentages apply as those used for activated sludge
structures by the same reasoning used for trickling filter equipment.
Secondary Sedimentation Equipment
Secondary sedimentation equipment is required for the removal of BOD and
SS from the secondary treatment system in the form of sludge. Based on
the percentages determined from the amount and source of sludge entering
the sludge thickening facilities, related cos ts are 60 and 40 percent
applicable to BOD and SS, respectively.
Secondary Sedimentation Structures
As with the design of primary sedimentation structures, flow is also the
basic sizing consideration for secondary sedimentation structures.
Nevertheless, the structure itself is constructed to remove BOD and SS.
On the basis used for activated sludge structures, capital and operating
costs related to the secondary sedimentation structures are allocated 25
percent to Flow, 50 percent. to BOD, and 25 percent to SS.
Digestion Equipment and Structures
The related capital and annual operating and maintenance costs of the
sludge digestion facilities is dependent upon the relative volume and
sources of the total sludge recovered within the treatment process.
Wastewater flow is not a consideration. As more secondary treatment
capacity is added to the joint works facilities, the percent of BOD
related sludge will increase:
Year Addition %BOD %SS
1977 46 MGD Secondary (Pl) 38 62
1981 75 MGD Secondary (P2) 41 59
1983 100 MGD Secondary (P2) 44 66
....
..
-
-
.....
...
...
APPENDIX B
s.
Since the change in the allocation percentages between BOD and SS is not
significant., cos ts are allocated 40 and 60 percent to BOD an'd SS,
respectively.
Secondary Lift Station Equipment, Structures, and Power
Capital and annual operation and maintenance costs are totally related
to the amount of flow pumped by this facility.
General Treatment Operations
General treatment operations includes the operators' salaries required.
to maintain adequate control over the various treatment processes.
Since it is not practical to determine the amount of operation time
spent on any specific treatment process with any degree of certainty,
and no clear-cut method for allocating these costs to the three treat-
ment parameters exists, the operators' salaries are divided equally
between the three parameters at 34 percent to Flow~ 33 percent to BOD,
and 33 percent to SS.
Solids Handling-Treatment
Since this process involves the same solids requiring digestion, all costs
are allocated 40 percent to BOD and 60 percent to SS as determined for the
sludge digestion facilities.
Solids Handling-Disposal
Same as solids handling-treatment.
Effluent Disinfection
All effluent disinfection facilities are related to the total amount of
flow discharged from the treatment plants.
Effluent Disposal
The costs of disposal of the treated wastewater through the ocean outfall
system are 100 percent flow related.
Other
Additional joint works work order categories which are not specific to any
one treatment process are:
Supervisory Control
Utility Systems
General Plant Complex
General Engineering
Industrial Waste and Permit
Laboratory and Research
These cos ts wi 11 be allocated to Flow, BOD, and SS on the bas is of the
overall percentage determined from all other joint works cost centers •
..
..
-
-
....
-
APPENDIX C
JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED USE OF AVERAGE ANNUAL VS.
MAXIMUM WASTE LOADS AS THE BASIS OF ICR PAYMENTS
The Federal Guidelines regarding Industrial Cost Recovery Systems reads as follows:
"If an industrial user's maximum flow .(hourly, daily, monthly,
seasonally, etc.) contributes to the cost of construction of a
treatment works, it should be the basis for that user's ICR payment.
No credit shall be given to the industrial user for the time period
when the user is not operating and pot discharging wastewater."
Ip order to determine whether an industrial user's flow "contributes to the cost
of construction of a treatment works" the criteria used for design of the treatment
facilities must be considered. The existing CSDOC treatment plants as well as
future planned facilities have or will be designed on a total system average annual
flow basis.
Design biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS) loadings are
based on the amount of these treatment parameters expected to be received at the
treatment facilities during the average day of the maximum month. Design BOD
and SS loadings are determined using a 25 percent increase in average annual BOD
and SS contributions. The 25 percent peaking factor is predicated on historical
raw wastewater characteristics received at the Joint Works treatment facilities.
These historical maximum monthly waste loads have not occurred consistently during
any one particular season and have not been associated with the increased production
of any one industry or industrial group. The draft project report entitled."Draft
Facilities Planning and Project Report, Joint Works Wastewater Treatment Improvements,
1976-1996" and dated March, 1977 states:
"There is no significant cyclic annual flow pattern at the Joint
Works that could be associated with industrial or agricultural
operations.· Because of this, all dry weather peak flows are assumed
divided evenly among all sources."
The above statement relates to the fact that the total industrial portion of
the overall waste load received at the treatment facilities is constant (whether
hourly, daily, monthly, or seasonally) and is in proportion to average annual
waste loads.
In addition, the specific individual industrial peak wastewater contributions of
two or more industries, generally do not occur during the same time. Instances
occur where peak production periods of one industry occur during the minimum
production season of another firm, thus peak waste loads are complementary rather
than additive.
In summary, the total industrial waste load discharge, whether peak or average,
contributes to the cost of construction of the treatment works in the proportion
of average annual industrial waste loads to the total average annual load received
at the two District treatment plants .
-
-
...
-
APPENDIX "D"
JOINT OWNERSHIP, OPERATION AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
-as amended -
(Effective July 1, 1970. Supersedes
original Agreement of OctoQer 8, 19~8)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of March,
1971, by and between the COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, DISTRICTS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, each being
a separate public corporation, duly organized and existing under the
County Sanitation District Act and each sometimes hereinafter referred
to as 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11.
W I T N E S S E T H: -----------
WHEREAS, each of the Districts, parties hereto; has been opera-
ting sewage treatment and disposal facilities jointly under the terms
and provisions of a certain agreement dated October 8, 1958, entitled
"Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement"; and,
WHEREAS, each of said Districts owns an undivided and. different
interest in the various units and facilities constituting the joint
treatment and disposal facilities of the County Sanitation Districts,
which are hereinafter called "Joint Treatment and Di"sposal Facilitiesn
and which are defined and described as all the jointly owned trunk
sewers, real property, improvements to real property, treatment plant
facilities, personal property and all sewerage facilities lying in, on
or upon any of the territory generally bounded by Ellis Avenue on the
north, the channel of the Santa Ana River on the east, the Pacific
Ocean on the south and Bushard Street extended southerly to the
Pacific Ocean on the west, and including in addition thereto the
disposal facilities extending into the adjacent Pacific Ocean; and,
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to enter into this super-
seding agreement for the purpose of updating the provisions of said
·agreement of October 8, 1958 in conformity with existing conditions and practices.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN EACH OF
THE DISTRICTS, PARTIES HERETO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, Califorrtia, is hereby made and appointed agent for each of the
Districts, parties hereto, for the purpose of contracting for new
construction, operating and maintaining the joint treatment and
disposal facilities and operating and maintaining the joint admini-
strative organization, and the granting of easements, licenses and
permits over, on, under or upon the territory and property of the
joint treatment and disposal facilities; provided, however, that any
agreement or contract to expend or any ex~enditure of money in excess
of the sum of .$2,000.00 (Resolution No. 884 dated Sept. 14, 1960),
shall be done at the direction of or with the approval of each of the
Districts, parties hereto (i.e., by motion or resolution authorizing,
approving or ratifying). That County Sanitation District No. 1 shall
perform such other duties as agent as may be directed by the
Districts, parties hereto .
-
--
Section 2. That all the County Sanitation· Districts, parties
hereto, shall have a joint administrative organization and office and
shall have the same General Manager, Secretary and General Counsel;
that said officers shall be appointed and serve at the pleasure of
all the Districts, parties hereto, acting in conjunction with each
other; that such persons shall be appointed and serve for such time
and for the compensation fixed by the Boards of Directors of the
seven County Sanitation Districts, parties hereto; that other
necessary or proper agents, servants, employees, attorneys, accountants,
laborers; or others may be employed.when authorized by the Board of
Directors of said seven County Sanitation Districts, which shall fix
their compensation and terms of employment.
Section 3. That each County Sanitation District party hereto,
shall from time to time transfer so much of its funds into the Sani-
tation District joint operating fund as may be necessary; that the
Sanitation District joint operating fund shall be used to pay all
administrative· expenses incurred in the existence of the County
Sanitation Districts, parties to this agreement, together with all
costs of operations arising from the treatment and disposal of sewage
and industrial .wastes, not including new or additional construction
as distinguished from maintenance costs of jointly owned facilities.
That each District shall be charged and shall pay the charges in
direct proportion to the annual gallonage flows from each District
into the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities. That said
charges shall be computed periodically, not more frequently than
monthly nor less frequently than annually.
That said annual gallonage flow from each District
shall be determined by the General Manager as-the sum of monthly
determinations. Said monthly determinations shall be made by install-
ing, when practicable, appropriate metering devices in trunk sewers
entering the joint treatment and disposal facilities and in trunk
sewers serving more than one District. That when s'aid metering
devices are not practicable or, when installed, are, in the judgment
of the General Manager, not functioning reliably, said monthly deter-
minations shall be made by the best methods available, including, but
not limited to, field measurements of flow in said trunlc sewers and
branch sewers and/or by estimating the current population and the per
capita discharge of domestic sewage and the total flow of industrial
waste in the ·District or area in question, as shown by experience
data when available.
That the terms "maintenance" and "operation" as used
herein shall mean the repairs and upkeep made necessary by ordinary
use and operation of the facilities,' including all tools and operating
equipment, materials and supplies, the wages and salaries of emplpyees
engaged in or connected with the operation of the facilities, inclu-
ding all tools and operating equipment, materials and supplies, the
wages and salaries of employees engaged in or connected with the
operation of the joint treatment and disposal facilities, and the
costs and expenses, including salaries, of the joint administrative·
organization, but not including any construction costs.
Section 4. That annually, not later than June 30 of each
calendar year commencing with the year 1971, there shall be an
-
-
-
adjustment of ownership interests in the whole. of the joint treatment
and disposal facilities between each of the Districts, parties hereto,
which shall prevail for the next ensuing fiscal year. That said
ownership interests shall be adjusted SO· that all sewage and indus-
trial waste originating within the Districts, parties hereto, may be
treated and disposed of by the jointly owned treatment and disposal
facilities. That the necessary percentage of each of the District's,
parties hereto, ownership shall be calculated according to the math-
ematical average of said flows and assessed valuations for the three
years immediately preceding the first day of July in each year, and
that as each year elapses, that year's figure shall be added and the
figures for the year oldest in time shall be dropped from the calcu-
lations. That after determining the necessary annual m·mership
percentage of each of the Districts, parties hereto, said percentage
·shall .be applied against the total capital investment in the· joint
treatment and disposal facilities as determined on June 30 of the
calendar year, to establish the ownership equity required by each
·.respective District. That payment or credits between the respective
Districts necessary to adjust to the so established ownership equity
required by each District shall be determined annually on June 30 of
the calendar year. That each District shall pay or receive over a
period of not to exceed five years from date of such establishment of
ownership equity, any payment or credit so determined and that any
said payments remaining unpaid shall bear interest at the rate of
three percent per ar1num. That the m·mership percentage of each Dis-
trict on the effective date of this agreement is hereby established as
set forth in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof • .,. .
Sec.tion 5. That in order to provide adequate sewerage facilities
to adequately treat and dispose of sewage and industrial wastes arising
within the Districts, parties hereto, it is contemplated that new
construction within the territory in which the treatment and disposal
facilities are located will be required from time to t±me. That when
such new construction is required and approved by each of the Dis-
tricts, parties hereto, each District shall contribute its proportionate
share of the costs thereof in accordance with the ownership interest
of each District as of the date of the payments to be made on any
such contract or contracts for construction.
That the term "c-onstruction" shall mean the con-
struction of any new facilities within the territory comprising the
joint treatment and disposal facilities and shall include recon-
struction which shall include the replacement or rebuilding of any of
the facilities of the joint treatment and disposal facilities whether
said replacement or rebuidling is made necessary by wear, obsolescence,
accident or damage or destruction by flood, storm, earthquakes or
other public calamity or act of God.
Section 5a. That in order to provide for an equitable and
fair distribution of contributions, received from any source, in
aid of construction or for purchases of capacity in jointly-owned
treatment and disposal facilities received by County Sanitation
District No. 1, of Orange County as agent for each of the Districts,
District. No. 1 shall promptly transfer to County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, their proportionate
share of such contributions or purchases in accordance with the
ownership interests of each District as of the date payments are
received for such contrlbutions or purchases.
-
Section 6. That each District, party h9reto, shall have
· the perpetual right to use all the joint treatment and disposal
facilities which are required to adequately treat and dispose or·
all sewage and industrial wastes arising-.within the territory of
said District. That none of the Districts, parties hereto, shall
in any way grant, encumber, limit or restrict its interest or owner-
ship in any part of the said joint treatment and disposal facilities
or seek to partition the same or have any part thereof set apart in
severalty or use said part for any purpose other than the disposal
of sewage and industrial wastes without the prior written consent of
the other Districts, parties hereto.
Section 7. That an:y fertilizer or other substance arising
out of the operation of the joint treatment and disposal facilities
shall be the properties of the County Sanitation Districts, parties
hereto, and may be sold for the best obtainable price, such sale to
be made by the General Manager, and the proceeds thereof shall be
·.divided and apportioned among the parties hereto· in the same proportion
as tne payments of maintenance and operation costs which are charged
against each District. That said money is to be apportioned among
and paid to said County Sanitation Districts on or before the fifteenth
day of the month following the month in which said payments are
received. That no District shall permit or knowingly.countenance the
use of the joint treatment and disposal facilities or any part thereof
for the disposal of sewage, effluent or industrial wastes originating
... ---.,outside of its territorial limits; except upon con.di tions agreed upon
·and consented to by each of the County Sanitation Districts, parties
hereto. That all revenues originating fr.om the disposal of such
sewage, effluent or industrial wastes originating outside of the
territorial limits of any County Sanitation District, party hereto,
shall be apportioned among the several Districts, according to agree-
ment reached when such Districts consent to receive such sewage
effluent or industrial wastes.
That the joint administrative organization shall
cause to be. kept accurate and correct books of account, showing in
detail the costs and expenses of any new construction, extra con-
struction or reconstruction and the maintenance and operation of the
joint treatment and disposal facilities and all parts thereof, and
all financial transactions of the County Sanitation Districts, which
books of account shall correctly show any receipts and also any
costs, expenses or charges to be paid by all or any of the parties
hereto, and also records. of the sewage flow from any of said Districts,
together with the strength of effluent delivered from each District.
That said books of account shall be open to inspection at all times
by .. any members of the Board of Direct.ors of any County Sanitation
District, party hereto, or by any accountant or other person autho-
rized _by such.Board of Directors to inspec~ said books of account.
That should any dispute or controversy arise in
connection with the said books of account, or in connection with the
cost of construction, maintenance, operations, repairs, reconstruction,
extra construction or any new construction of the joint treatment and
disposal facilities or in connection with any of the affairs or
operations thereof or any part of this agreement, the Board of
Directors of each County Sanitation District, party hereto, shall
appoint or designate one member thereof as arbitrator and said
-
-
arbitrators so chosen shall act as a Board of Arbitration in connection
with any such dispute or controversy, and the findings approved by the
vote of a majority of said Board of Arbitration shall be binding and
conclusive upon all the parties hereto. Provided, however, that,
should the said arbitrators be unable to obtain a majority vote on
any issue presented to it, then said arbitrators voting in favor of
making a finding on such issue shall designate a disinterested person
to act as an arbitrator, and the arbitrators voting against making
such a finding shall designate a disinterested person to act as an
arbitrator, and the persons so designated shall designate a disinter-
ested person to act as the third arbitrator and the three persons so
selected shall constltute a Board of Arbitration to act in place of
and have the powers of the Board of Arbitration composed of members
of the respective Boards of Directors, and the findings approved by
a vote of majority of the Board of three arbitrators shall be binding
and conclusive upon all parties hereto.
Section 8. That·this agreement shall continue in effect so
long as it shall be to the interest and advantage of the Districts,
parties hereto, to maintain such Joint Administrative Organization
and to operate a joint treatment and disposal facility. That if at
any time it should cease to be to the interest and advantage of any.
District, party hereto, to continue as a party to .this agreemept and
its Board of Directors shall so find and declare by resolution adopted
by a two-thirds majority of the total number of Directors of such
District, it may withdraw herefrom and terminate its obligations
hereunder after one year's notice in writing to the other parties
hereto of its intention to do so. That such withdrawal of a District .
shall become effective only at the end of the fiscal year next after
the aforesaid one year's notice of intention ·to withdraw and shall
n·ot become effective unless such withdrawing District shall have fully
and completely discharged all of its debts and obligations to any
other District, party hereto, or the joint administrative organization,
for which it shall become or has become liable up to the date of its
withdrawal; provided, however, that should any District withdraw here-
.from, this agreement shall continue in effect thereafter as to the
remaining parties thereto in like manner as if said District so with-
drawing had never been a party to said agreement; prqvided further,
that any District so withdrawing from the joint administrative
organization shall not be entitled to be reimbursed for any contri-
butions previously made by it directly or indirectly to the State
Employees Retirement System of the State of California pursuant to
the provisions of this agreement.
Section 9. That this agreement shall be effective as of July 1,
1970, and shall supersede and take the place of that certain Joint
Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated October 8~
1958, as amended.
I
• I -
! !
J
I
I ) ~
J
. I
LJ
I I
1 I ..
~
u
0
u
u
u
J
i f -
VII. STATE WATER RESOURCES
CONTROL BOARD REVENUE
PROGRAM FORMS
I
..,
I l I . I l
FORM 1
SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
A 8
tii.::":lber of USERS USER GROUPS
Parcels
289 Industrial
504.224 Residential and Small
Nonresidential
123 Tax Exempt
3 Federal Installations
504,639 SUBTOTAL.
~ Special Classifications >< Infiltration! Inflow
~ Future Capacity
Federal Facilities
154 Local Government**
504,793 TOTALS
*Thousands of pounds
**City, County and Schools
c
S.l.C
Group
Number
>< I>< >< ><
I><
I l l I "'l I ( 1 •• I l I
rJIUNICI PALITY CSDOC -All Districts
DATE 1979-1980
Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capacitv T~tal Annual Car acitv
D E F G H I J K
Flo~ BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOO SS
MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day ilG lbs lbs
25.2 538 404 112, 807 84,803 9,177 41.175 30,952
164.4 207 333 284,095 457,020 60,468 103,630 166,706
0.6 377 310 1,782 1,470 207 650 536
0.3 213 181 518 468 104 185 157
.
190.5 399,202 543,761 69,956 145,640 198,351
1.0 >< >< >< >< 365 >< >< >< .><. ><
5.1 250 250 10,332 10,332 1,809 3, 771 3, 771
196.6 409,534 554,093 149 ,411 202,122
I
I I ( l [_ I I I ( l I I I I · l · · I I I (
FORM 1 rJIUNICI PALITY CSDOC -District No. 1
su~~MARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS DATE 1979-1980
A B c Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capaci tv Total Annual Car. acitv
Ni.::cber of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C D E F G H I J. K
Parcels Group Flow BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOD SS
Number MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day iW lbs !bs
54 Industrial 3.0 503 633 i2.394 15.609 1 079 4,524 5~697
33,574 Residential and Small
Nonresidential 21.06 207 333 36,358 58,488 7' 719 13, 271 21,348
18 Tax Exempt (2600 employees 0.04 250 250 77 77 14 28 28
-
33,646 SUBTOTAL 24.1 48,829 74,174 8,812 17,823 27,073
>< Special Classifications >< _>< Infiltration/ Inflow r>< >< >< >< >< >< >< _>< Future Capacity r>< _>< ">< ><
Federal Facilities I>< I
20 Local isoo emB 0c Governmen~'x37.0 ~ ts 0.4 250 250 817 817 14~ ?OQ 298
33,666 TOTALS 24.5 49,646 74,991 8,955 18,121 27,371
*Thousands of pounds .
H:r.1 tv, r.onPtv and Scho0l s
I I I ( I ( ( I .( I. l I I ~r . ·t . I I I
FORM 1 MUNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 2
SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS DATE 1979-1980
A B c Wastewater Ch.aracteristics Desiqn Caoacitv Total Annual Cai:: a<::itv
Ni:mber of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C 0 E F G H I J K
Parcels Group Flow BOO SS BOO SS Volume BOO SS
Number MGO mg I mg I lbs day lbs day i/.G lbs !bs
121 Industrial 11. 2 530 494 '49,322 45,938 4,073 18,003 16,767
120,813 Residential and Small
·Nonresidential 44.3 207 333 76,479 123,031 16,214 27,915 44,906
46 Tax Exempt (6.,700 ernploye es 0.3 155 138 340 304 96 124 111
+ Cal State F lllert :m)
120,980 SUBTOTAL. 55.8 126,141 169", 273 20,383 46,042 61,784
_>< Special Classifications >< >< Infiltration! Inflow r>< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< Future Capacity >< >< =::><_ ><
Federal Facilities ><
57 Local !:> lUU ~ ~~ >es Government**172.orn ) c mts 1.8 250 250 3,690 3.690 646 1.347 1.347
121,037 TOTALS 57.6 129,831 172,963 21,029 47,389 63,131
*Thousands of pounds
* -:: ("' ! ~ '' r• ., I ' n f•" '1 '1 ,,·l ~ (' h n n 1 "'
I I ( I l I I
FOR~ 1
SW/.MARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
A 8 c
~i:.:-ite: of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C
Parcels Group
Number
48 Industrial
157,7.19 Residential and Small
Nonresidential
35 Tax Exempt (4,900 employee ;)
Federal Installations
1 Calif. Army National Guard
1 Naval Weapons Station/
Seal Beach
157,802 SUBTOTAL
.>< Special Classifications _>< Infiltration! Inflow
>< Future Capacity
Federal Facilities
40 Local 4500 0n Government** 133,0 1(
157,842 TOTALS
*Thousands of pounds
**Cttv, County and Schools
1><
I><
l>< :><
~~
l I I I I l l I l I I l
'
rJ1UNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 3
DATE 1979-1980
Wastewater Characteristics Desi qn Capaci tv Total Annual Car acitv
D E F G H I J K
Flow BOD SS BOO SS Volume BOD . SS
MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs da1 ;;",G lbs 1~s
7.8 642 302 41 5S9 10 C:AQ · 2,832 15.169 7.13S
'
53.6 207 333 92,534 148,859 19,580 33 .so3 I 54.378
0.07 250 250 143 143 25 52 c;?
0.05 200 120 96 91 19 :n lQ
0.03 160 107 35 24 10 13 9
61.5 134.367 168.665 22.466 49 OfiR 61 59\
>< ~ ~ >< ~ >< >< >-< ~
I
s nts 1.4 250 250 2.869 ? RfiQ r:;n? 1 0.17 1 ()d7 -
62.9 137,236 171,534 22,968 so, 115 62,640
I
I I I I l I I
FORM 1
SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
A
Number of
Parcels
1
14,935
.
2
14,938
><
><" ><
5
14,943
B
USERS USER GROUPS
Industrial
Residential and Small
Nonresidential
Tax Exempt (200 employees)
SUBTOTAL.
Special Classifications
Infiltration/ Inflow
Future Capacity
Federal Facilities
Local Government**g?8o~m~t8t
TOTALS
*Thousands of pounds ·
**C~ty, County and Schools
c
S.l.C
Group
Number
><
C><
C>< >< ~~
I l I ( .. I I I l I I I I
rJIUNICI PALITY. CSDOC -District No. 5
DATE 1979-1980
Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capaci tv Total Annual Car acitv
D ~ F G H I J K
Flow BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOO SS
MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day i{,G lbs lbs
0.10 157 l57 132 132 37 48 48
9.4 207 333 16,228 26,106 3,432 5.925 9.531
o. oo:~ 250 250 6 6 1 2 2
9.6 16,366 26.224 3.470 5.975 9.581
1.0 >< >< >< >< 365 >< >< >< ~ ~
0.05 250 250 112 11? 20 4] 41
10.6 16,478 26,356 3,855 6,016 9,622
I ( I I ( I I
FOR~. 1
SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
I
'
A B c
:;:.:~,se~ o~ USERS USER GROUPS · S.l.C Parcels Group . Number
6 Industrial
21,426 Residential and Small
Nonresidential
7 Tax Exempt (800 employees &
Fairview State Hospital)
I
21,439 SUBTOTAL.
>< Special Classifications ~ >< Infiltration! Inflow >< >< Future Capacity D<
13
21,452
Federal Facilities ><
Local Government**a£?o8~P~~~~~
TOTALS I
*Thousands of pounds
**City, County and Schools
I I I I I I l I I I I (
tJ1UNICIPALITY ~SDOC -District No. 6
DATE 1979-1980
Wastewater Characteristics Desiqn Capacity Total Annual Car. acitv
D E F G H I J K
Flow 800 SS BOO SS Volume 800 SS
MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day fi·,G !b~ lbs
0.8 117 90 828 639 310 302 n:-;
I
I
l
1.'(' ' 17.0 207 333 20,717 33,327 4,350 7,SlQ 12,081
I
0.1 1.010 753 1.153 860 50 421 314
.
12.9 22,698 34,826 4 '710 8,233 12,628
>< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< ><
i
0.4 250 250 870 870 152 318 318
13.3 23,568 35,696 4,862 8,551 12,946
I
I
..
I I l I I I
.FORM l
SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
A B -------'. c
N!.!!':lbN of USERS USER GROUPS
Parcels
44 Industrial
62,158 Residential and Small
Nonresidential
8 Tax Exempt (900 employees
8 Univ. CA/Irvine)
Federal Installations
1 Marine Coros Air Station
62. 211 SUBTOTAL
>< Special Classifications >< Infiltration! Inflow
>< Future Capacity
Federal Facilities
13 Local 9go 0~plo, Government**3 .0 stt
62,224 TOTALS
*Thousands of pounds
**City, County and Schools
S.l.C
Group
Number
>< I><
C><
><
:~
l I I .·.I I I I ( I I
rAUNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 7
DATE 1979-1980
Wastewater Characteristics Desian Caoacitv Total Annual Car. acitv
D E. F G H I J K
Flow BOD SS BOO SS Volume BOD SS
MGO mg I mg I lbs day lbs day il.G lbs 1:s
1.9 517 168 8.312 2.699 703 3 0'\4 QRt;
9.8 207 333 16,919 27,217 3,565 6,lSSi 9.901
o. o: 250 250 38 38 7 14 14
0.2 227 207 387 353 75 141 129
11.9 25,656 30,307 4,350 9,344 11, 029
>< ~ ~ ~ >< >< _><. ><.. ><
0.4 250 250 .743 743 130 271 271
12.3 26,399 31,050 4,480 9,615 11, 300
I I -I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I
FO R~I 1 rJ1UNICIPALITY CSDOC -District No. 11
SUMMARY OF USERS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS DATE 1979-1980
A 8 c Wastewater Characteristics Design Caoacitv Total Annual Car acitv
D E F G H I J K ~•~-::r of USERS USER GROUPS S.l.C Parcels I Group Flow BOD SS BOD SS Volume BOD SS
Number MGD mg I mg I lbs day lbs day ii.G !!ls I Its
15 Industrial 0.4 79 73 2fif ?7.:R 14~ 95 87
-
93,601 Residential and Small
Nonresidential 14.4 207 333 24.860 39.992 5.243 9.051 I 14.t;fil
l
7 Tax Exem~t (800 emolovees 0.04 77 128 25 42 14 q 1 ~
+ State Beach)
I
93,623 SUBTOTAL 14.8 25,145 40.272 5.400 9 .155 14.663 >< Special Classifications >< >< Infiltration! Inf/aw ~ >< >< >< >< >< >< >< Future Capacity C>< >< ><I"><
Federal F~cilitics >< I
6 · . ouu empl( Local Governmentx*S9.000 s ye:~ .u.a-nt_: 0.6 250 250 1.231 1. 231 216 449 449
93,629 TOTALS I 15.4 2·6, 376 41.,503 5,616 9,604 15' 112
I
*Thousands of p ounds
**City, County and Schools
I I I I I l I l l l I ... I I I l I I I
FORM 2.0
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST DATA(!) SUMMARY MUNICIPALITY CSDOC DATE 3/13/79
(Figures in $000's)
l ·. TREATMENT FACILITIES CURRENT YEAR 1978-79 FIRST YEAR REVENUE PROGRAM 1979-80
LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & Eg MAT'LS TOTAL. LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & EQ MAT' LS . TOTAL
Bl. Influent/Effluent . $195.7 $164.3 $ 15.7 $407. 0. .$782. 7 $246.1 $206.7 $ 19.7 $511. 9 $984.4
B2. Primary Equipment 59.5 54.8 4.7 37.5 156.5 74.8 68.9 6.0 47.2 196.9
B3. Primary Structur~s 25.8 30.5 1..6 20.3 78.2 32.5 38.4 2.0 25.6 98.5
B4. Secondary Equipment 61. 0 64.2 1. 6 29.7 156.S 76.8 80.7 2.0 37.4 196.9
BS. Secondary Structures 7.0 7.0 ·o.8 24.3 39.1 8.9 8.9 1.0 30.S 49.3
B6. Digestion-Solids 200.4 275.S 25.0 751.3 1252.2 252.0 346.5 31.3 945.1 1575.1
B7. Operative-Utilities 606.5 450.0 900.3 1956.7 763.0 566.1 1132. 2 2461.3
BB. General & Admini-
strative 1429.9 1021. 4 34.0 919.1 3404.4 1798.6 1284.7 42.8 1156. 3 4282.4
Sub-Total $2585.8 $2067.7 $ ·33. 4 $3089.5 $7826.4 $3252.7 $2601.0 $104·. 8 $3886.2 $9844.8
REPLACEMENT 326.6 410. 2
DEPRECIATION o.o 0.0
TOTAL TREATMENT FACILITIES $8153.0 $10,255.0
2. COLLECTION FACILITIES
Total Districts' Budgets 448.6 574.1 68.9 750.6 1842.2 460.7 587.6 70.7 753.0 1872.0
REPLACEMENT 76.8 78.0
DEPRECIATION 0.0 0.0
TOTAL COLLECTION FACILITIES $1919.0 $19SQ.O
3. TOTAL SYSTEM $10,07.2.0 $12,205.0
I I I I ( I
FORM 2.1
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST DATA (l)
1. TREATMENT FACILITIES
Bl. Influent/Effluent
B2. Primary Equipment
B3. Primary.Structures
B4. Secondary Equipment
BS. Secondary Structures
B6. Digestion-Solids
B7. Operations-Utilities
BS. General & Administrative
REPLACEME:-ff
TOTAL TREATMENT FACILITIES
I l ( I I
COST ALLOCATION TO
LOADING PARAMETER
(Figures in $OOO's)
I
FIRST YEAR REVENUE PROGRi\M 1979-80
$984.4
196.9
98.5
196.9
49.3
1575.1
2461.3
4282.4
410.2
$10,255.0
'
2. COLLECTION FACILITIES (Includes Replacement)
District 1
2
3
s
6
7
11
TOTAL COLLECTION FACILITIES
3. TOTAL SYSTEM
$ 90.9
33·3. 0
438.0
306.9
85.0
434.2
212.0
$1950.0
$12,205.0
I I I I I I I
MUNICIPALITY CSDOC DATE 3/13/79 -----
FLOW . BOD SS
$984.5
-0-
34. S
-0-
12. 3
-0-
836. 8
1456.0
138.5
$3462.6
$ 90.9
383.0
438.0
306.9
85.0
434.2
212.0
$1950.0
$5412.6
$-0-
68. 9
19.7
118.1
24.6
630.1
812:2
1284.7
123.3
$-0-
127. 9
44.3
78.8
12.3
945.1
812.2
1541.7
148.4
$3081.6 $3710.8
$3081.6 $3710.8
I l I I I I I ( I I I ··1 I I I l l I l
FORM 2.2
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST DATA DISTRICTS' BUDGET DETAIL MUNICIPALITY CS DOC DATE 3/13/79
(Figures in $OOO's)
DISTRICT CURRENT YEAR 1978-79 FIRST YEAR REVENUE PROGRAM 1979-80
LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & EQ MAT' LS REP LAC TOTAL LABOR OVERHEAD VEH & EQ MAT' LS REP LAC TOTAL --
1 $ 27.1 $ 23.9 $ 1.6 $ 27.1 •$ 3.3 $ 83.0 $ 29.7 $ 26.2 $ 1. 7 $ 29.7 $ 3.6 $ 90.9
2 95.4 122.7 10. 2 112.4. 14.2 354.9 103.0 132.4 11.0 121.3 15.3 383.0
3 82.4 105.3 9.2 261 •. 0 19.1 477.0 75.7 96.7 8.4 239.7 17.5 438.0
5 61.6 69.6 10.7 125.9 11.1 278.9 67.8 76.6 11. 8 138.5 12.2 306.9
6 17.2 21. 7 2.2 33.7 3.1 78.1 18.8 23.7 2.4 36.7 3.4 85.0
7 126.4 175.4 28.5 77 .5 . 17. 0 424.9 129.2 179.2 29.2 79.2 17.4 434.2
11 38.4 55.4 6.4 113. 0 8.9 222.2 36.6 52.9 6.1 107.9 8.5 212.0
Sub-Total $448.6 $574.1 $ 68.9 $750.6 $ 76.8 $1919.0 $460.8 $587.7 $ 70.6 $753.0 $ 78.0 $1950.0
SEPRECIATION -0--0-
TOTAL DISTRICTS BUDGET $1919.0 $1950.0
Jorm 4 nJ.JuSTRt~L cosf.l l\.iCO~ .t:..1u ALluL;ATIJN:; I l ( l I I I f\LN1CrPJLn Y !~uuc l ·oA~E 3/l!/79
(Pl-16 Only)
Grant Eligible Flow BOD SS
Component Total Cost Co.st % _$_ % _$_ % _$_
Activated Sludge
Equipment $ 8,107,700 $ 7,730,810 0 $ 0 60 $ 4,638,490 40 $ 3,092,320
Structures 9,302,120 8,569,440 25 2,142,360 50 4 '284' 720 25 2,142,360
Secondary Claifiers
Equipment 2,503,000 2,361,990 0 0 60 1,417,190 40· 944,800
Structures 3,602,460 3,561,130 25 890 ,280 50 1,780,570 25 890,280
Sludge Thickeners
Equipment 766,560 756,560 0 0 60 453,940 40 302,620
Structures 590,930 584 ,150 0 0 60 350,490 40 233,660
Digesters and Digester
Control Bldg
Equipment 1,139,600 1,126,230 o. 0 40 450,490 60 675,740
Structures 2,787,690 2,755,710 0 0 40 1,102,280 60 1,653,430
Sludge Dewatering
Equipment 5 76' 700 518,820 0 0 40 207,530 60 311,290
Structures 130,270 128,780 0 0 40 51,510 60 77, 270
Chlorination 4272130 356,630 100 356 2 630 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total 29,934,160 28,450,250 12 3,389,270 52 14, 737 ,210 36 10, 323, 770
Order Control 533,920 24 7' 790 12 29,?30 52 128, 850 36 89,200
Primary Power 684, 300. 672,550 12 80, 710 52 349,730 36 242,120
Landscaping 108, 250 107,000 12 12,840 52 55,640 36 38', 520
Yard Piping and Misc. ·802,530 649,220 12 77 ,910 52 337 '590 36 233,720
Total . $32,0G3,1GO $30,126,810 12 $3,590,460 $52 $15,609,020 36 $10,927,330
Federal Grant Portion $22,595,110 $2,692,840 $11, 706' 770 $ 8,195,500
Federal Grant Portion ~ 30 $ 753,170 $ 89,760 $ 390,230 $ 273,180
*Based on·Grant Elinible Cost
..
-
..
Form G
MUNICIPALITY CS DOC
UNIT COST DETERMINATION (1979-80) DATE _3Ll.3J.~79"---L Cos I C~1lcgory ~ SA
C3 .C D E u
Par:i1r.rtcr Annu:il Cost Total Quantities U11il Cosl S For Each~
Alloc.1hon Alloc:1tcd Parameter ·
Pcrccnt:i~~s to Eac.h P:uamclcr See Form IA !i
1. ICR From Form 4 From Form 4
_><:_ ~f I II ~ . ·1
$ 71. 765/MG
(c)fi
Flow 89.760 $ 1. 251/MG I~
BOD 390,230 149,41Ha) $ 2: 612 (b) ~
! SS 273,180 202,122(a) $ 1. 352 (b) tl .'.J
TOTAL $ 753,170 ~ !I
2. DEBT SERVICE From Form 5 fi ~1 -=:>-<::. ~·~ I II --)1
.. Flow ll ,4
BOD NLA ~ ,,
$5 r1
1
:
I 3, CAPITAL OUTLAY From Form 5 .:i 'i
~ ~;·i 'I
Ill
... --ii ":·t ,
tt Flow N/A
~ BOD 1l ~
SS H : ~ ~
J -"
' f J 4 0 & fd See Inst. From Form 2.1 :
" II I ~ ~!·~
(cJ!l
Flow s 5.412.600 69,956/MG $77. 37149/MG 1~ r!
BOD d 3,081,627 145,640 (a) $21, 159207 (b)!1
' ti
; SS · 3,710,772 198,351 (a) $!8, 708108(bltl
L ..... , ... ==,..,.....,1.~T~~~.,_~~=-. H II ~.~u;..;d
(a) Thousands of .pounds
(b) Per thousands of pounds.
(c) In order to calc11lat~ the actual charge for any individual user, the flow
rate shown here must be broken down to the rate for the District in which
the user is located and the joint works rate. The combined flow rate shown
here represents a weighted average of all seven Districts plus the joint
· · '~o-rks irate.. ·
I I I I I I I I ~ l I I l I I I I I I
FORM 7 MUN I Cf PALITY . __ C_S_DO_C,;;._---:-----------
. su:~~:l,ARY OF FU~D COSTS FUND mf & R DATE 3/13/79
I SS
[
I
E I F I G
U~IT COST s (1) UNIT COST
SOD SS
9': $21.159207~1 41,175 rs. 708108/
1000 1 1000 lb $ 2,160.32 -
" 60,468
I
'>n"7 I
104 I
I
I
" 1 103~ II
" I 650 I " -·i . I
It l 185 I "
I
166,706 I 1231 Tax Exempt · 1 11 I 207 • 11 • "on • " 1 o<"
Fl •· I ••
1
Federal Installations " 157
9,989.98
f 39.80
·r
'
14.90
I ~ I I LJ ~
145,640
J I
' I
l-iSVSTOTALS 1 69,956 198,351 $12,205.0
j I Special Classifications N/A -,
l Infiltration 1 lnflo'll (2)
I I Futvre Capocity
J l Federal Facilities
N/A I
N/_A. I
I
. . I I I I I . 1 I I SUBTOTALS . I . ·. J .. . . I " 1$12,205.0 I
I ! . TO I ALS --·. _____L_, __LI ---'----
r,~ ...... .._ .. -...............
(1) Thousands of pounds
(2) Included in Flow Unit Cost.
l I l I l I I ·I ( I I : . I l I I l 1 I l
FORr~ 7 MUNICIPALITY CS DOC
SWlM . .;RY OF FUND COSTS ' FUND __ r_c_R _____ DATE 3/13/79
·;. -~, .• o· I FLOW BOD (1) SS (2) TOTAL
B c r; E F G II !
I "'r::r~·-I I USER/GROUP UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST '.) .,,,,_, > Q s BOD s SS s ' •
289. Industrial $1. 251/MG 9,177/MG $2.6121 1 £R~ 41,175 $ J.OOC 1,3521/lbs. 30,952 $160,877
H -
I l
I I
I i I
i I
' I I , I
\
SUBTOTALS 9~177 /MG 41,175 30,952 $160,877
Special Classifications
Ir.filtration! Inflow
Future Capacity
I Federal Facilities
SUBTOTALS ---I
TOTALS
$160,877
-
(1) Thousands of Pounds
(2) Included in Flow Unit Cost ..
( I I i I l I ( ( t ( I B I
FORM 8
t-.r: ~·iU AL REV EN U E
MUNICIPALITY ___ c_s_o_o_c _______ _ CATE __ 3~/_1_3~/7_9 ____ _
FIRST FULL YEAR OF OPERATION 1979-80
D E G K F II --A -I B C
O&M Cost ;.,,e:JC'e ~1·.;-:~: 'j: I USER GROUPS First Fell Capital O_perating (l Ad~inist~at:on Total ArmuJI ?e·.e:-~;.e
I, :..;:;::•s Yr.ar Debt Ser'lice Outlays Reserves · ICR Costs (1: R!!vr!~::e ~:::-:~:
t_,_ ___________________________ --"'~~.:;,r.tl_ln,~in--;r-~-----r--------r---------t---------{--------.~------~~-..:r~~e~e:~~~~--+-------~ I 289 I Industrial $·2,160,324 N/A N/A $160,877 I
J
~ 2;321,19~ $ 8031.8
I l I
bo4,224 J Residential/Small Non-Res. 9,989,98~ " r t
i i I 123 i Tax Exemut " " " 39 '79~
" NIA 9,989,98~ 19.·8
39,79i 323.6
i
l 3 I
1 Federal Installation 14.89J " " " 14' 89~ 4966.3
I I r·~-:,·-~---~~~--~--'r~----+-~---t--------+------l------t-----~~--~------~----~
I
i ,.
l
~-~'1 --~------~~-------."-----}--~·~---+----ll. ____ ~----~--_.__--~
I I SP~:!,."\L CLASSIFICATIONS
1-,-·----l---+----+--+---~~!~......,....-. ------,,,..)----+---+----!---. ~
t I 111/UtraUon/inffow (1) I~~
Future Capacity N/A
Federal Fecilities N/A ><
[, _____ .. 'l_~s_u=-o __ -=' O=T=, A=TL=o-~=A=L=========~~$""",·-2-, 2-o-s-,-0-0
1
)-----J!,--_-J-'.-._-_-_-_-_-_-::1_$~1~6-o_-,_8~7-._7~"'J,,_·-_-_-_-_-_-_-:.?,.,.1-~.~~~~~~'.-i:,.r-·1-1_:~"~:-6_6-:_'-,_:~:-4,"""'·, ~~~~~~~-.i
(1) Included in 0 & M Costs
[
FORM 9 I I ( I I I I I (
MUNICIPALITY CS DOC
RATE DETERMINATION AND REVENUE PROGRAM SUMMARY
USER GROUP 1979-80 REVENUES
REVENUE TYPE
RESIDENTIAL/ Residential Small Nonresidential
SMALL NONRESIDENTIAL User Charges Collected Through
1% Ad Valorem Taxes
INDUSTRIAL/
COMMERCIAL
TAX EXEMPT/
GOVERNMENTAL
INDUSTRIAL/
COMMERCIAL (ICR)
ALL USERS
Excess 1% AV Taxes Collected
From Residential/SNR Users
Total 1% AV Taxes Collected
From Residential/SNR Users
Districts' Share of 1% AV Taxes
Paid by Industrial Commercial
Users
Net Directly Billed User Charge
(After Credit for AV Taxes)
Total Ind/Comm OM&R Revenues
Directly Billed User Charges
Total Tax Exempt/Gov't Revenues
Total FY 1980 OM&R Revenue Col-
lections
!CR Charges (Directly Billed)
Total OM&R and !CR Revenues
REVENUE AMOUNT
$9,989,982
569,018
$10,559,000
$ 327,000
1,833,322
$ 2,160,322
54,696
$ 54,696
$12,774,018
$ 160,877
$12,934,895
L. I l I I I I ~ · 1
DATE 3/19/79
FIRST FULL YEAR OF OPERATION
1979-80 REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENT TYPE
OM&R Requirements Attributable
To Residential/Small Non-
Residential Users
Excess to be Carried Over to
Res/SNR User Class in FY 1981
Total Res/SNR Requirement"s
OM&R Costs Attributable
to Industrial/Commercial
Users
OM&R Requirements Attributable
to Tax Exernpt/Gov't Users
Total OM&R Requirements (Incl
Carryover to FY 1981)
ICR Requirements
REQUIREMENT AMOUNT
$9,989,982
569,018
$10,559,000
$ 2,160,322
54,696
$12,774,018
$ 160,877
Total OM&R and ICR Requirements $12,934,895