The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-03-14COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY , CALIFORNIA P . 0. BOX 8 1 27, FOUNTAIN VA LLEY, C A LIF O RNIA 92708 10 844 ELLIS AVENU E (EU C LID O FF-R AM P . SAN DIE G O FREEWAY) March 7, 1979 NOTI CC OF REGUL.~R M EE T ii ~G Di sl-P T ''TC' ~t ,..H' l 2 .1 .. L ~1 l~U.), J ) ---·----·--- 1 •1 rn~1 ESD~'( ~ARr H lfi PIS.:. .. !~ -J ,'"\ J I: . \.; -I J 1979 -7:30 P.M . 10 84 4 ELLIS AVENU E FOUNTAIN VALL EY, CALIFORNIA T he next :::e gt:.1ar meeting of the Boards of Directors of CoUl~ty Sani tLJtion Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5 , 6, 7 and 11 of O~ange County , California , wi ll be held at the above hour and_ date . Scheduled upcomin g ffi§!8 !:~n g__§_; FISCAL POLICY CO .MIH'I''l'EE -Tuesday, March 27, at 11:00 a .m . EXECUTI VE CO~llTTEE Wednesday , March 28 , at 5:30 p .m . TEL EP HO NES: AR E A CODE 714 540 -2910 962-2411 l\DJ.OURNED DISTRICTS MEE TING!::: 1 & 7 -(D ates , t i mes and p l aces to be determined by the Board s to review pros and cons DISTRI CT 2 DISTl\.ICTS 3 & DH~'J1:R:CC'TS 5 & 11 6 of consclid.:t tio o. of the Districts. Staff suggests the Boards me~t duri~g the w~eks of Mar~h 2 6th and April 2nd.) -~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE u FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714)962·2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES - ·March Mar 14' 1979 Mar 28, 1979 April Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979 June June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 July July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979 August Aug 8, 1979 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979 ,. Oct ob.er Oct IO, 1979 Oct ?5, 1979 November Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979 December Dec 12, 1979 None Scheduled January Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980 February Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980 March Mar 12, 1980 Mar 26, 1980 BOARDS OF DmECTORS <"'I ---;;.-f_,~unty Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 II ol Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Codo 714 5-40-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE MARCH 14J 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro t~m, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (5) . Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda · _(6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving.minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -February 14, 1979, regular and February 22, 1979, adjourned District 2 -February 14, 1979, regular District 3 February 14, 1979, regular District 5 February 14, 1979, regular District 6 -February 14, 19.79, regular District 7 -February 14, 1979, regular : ', District 11 -February l4, 1979, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALI. DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying pnyment of claims of the joint and indi vj dual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be.called only once and that vote will be r~garded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote ~ differently for any District) i JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "D" DIS1'RICT NO. 2. See page(s) "B" and "D" i See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 3 ... "B" and "D" ! I NONE DISTRICT NO. 5 I 1 DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE. ,. i (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q ) Al~ matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Merttbers of the public who wish to remove an item from the co~sent calen~ar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state th~ir name, address and designate by letter the item to be _removed from the consent cal cndar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calcndrir. Consi<lcration of action to npprove all agenda items appcnring on 1 thc consent calendar not specifically removed from snme • .. 2- '• (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, authorizing an addition of $1,644.24 to the contract with Caliagua, Inc. for field modifications to adapt piping requirements to existing conditions, and granting a time extension of 18 calendar days for said work. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-30, accepting Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-31, approving plans and specifications for Digesters 5 and 6, "C" and "D", "F" and "G", Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-061, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: 5/1/79) See page "G" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-32, approving plans and specifications for Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (e) (f). (g) (h) (i) (Tentative bid date 5/1/79) See.page "H" Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with des1gn of Hydraulic Reliability at Plant No. 1 in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services Consideration of motion authorizing formation of an Energy Management Task Force, and authorizing the General Manager to engage John Carollo Engineers to prepare an energy management plan, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000 Consideration of Resolution No. 79-33, approving and authorizing execution of· Addendum No. 4 to agreement with John Carollo Engineers/Greeley & Hansen for design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 relative to preparation of an Operationsand Maintenance Manual for said facilities, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum additional .amount not to exceed $75,000. See page "I" Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award a purchase order contract for TV inspection of the Ellis Avenue Force Main, for an amount not to exceed $8,000 . Consideration of motion declaring intent to make any salary adjustments agreed to for laboratory and instrumentation reclassifications, pursuant to existing Memoranda of Understanding, effective March 9, 1979 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ,,. I. ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-34, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with The Irvine Company re Districts' sewage solids processing and disposal operation U at County's Class II-2 landfill site. See page "J" (k) Consideration of motion authori_zing the staff to purchase a corrosion-proof tank for polymer storage from Core-Rosin Products of Panorama City, for an amount not to exceed $7,589.00 plus tax and freight DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of pump parts for the Seal Beach Pump Station to Flo-Systems, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $7,804.00 plus freight (n) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Erwin Hinden dba Bill's Family Restaurant, dated February 1, 1979, in the amount of $12,265.35 in connection with construction of \...,,) the Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and refer to contractor and Districts' liabi~ity claims · adminis.trator for appropriate action DISTRICT 5 (o) Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (copy enclosed with agenda material) (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of pump parts for the Bay Bridge Pump Station to Flo-Systems, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $9,157.00 plus freight DISTRICT 11 (q) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Huntington Beach, dated March 7, 1979, requesting modifications to proposed reimbursement agreement re Warner Avenue Re lief Sewer, Phase II. See page "K" (2) Consideration of motion approving modification of the Master Plan re Warner Avenue Relief Sewer (3) Consideration of motion reaffirming declared intent to enter foto standard reimbursement agrce.ment with City of Huntington Beach for design and construction of Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Phase II, as modified END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -4- (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS (13) Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from . Southern California Association of Governments dated February 13, 1979, requesting action by the Board to adopt resolution committing implementation of those elements in the South Coast Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan under the jurisdiction of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. See page "L" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-35, committing to the implementation and enforcement of those elements of the South Coast Areawide Management Plan appropriate to the jurisdiction of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. See page "M" ALL DISTRICTS Gonsideration of items re award of contract for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job _No. J-3-1: (deferred from 2/14/79 meeting) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., dated March 1, 1979, withdrawing their request to be relieved of-their bid on Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at .Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-371. See page "N" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-36, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. in the amoWlt of $247,225.00. See pages "0" and "P" (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for 6-month period ending December 31st (copy enclosed with agenda material) (15) ALL DISTRICTS Receive staff report re potential consolidation savings and take under submission (report enclosed with agenda material) (16) ALL DISTRICTS Report of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. on status of revenue program (written material included in Executive Conunittee Report) (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any -5- ·-== --"' (lfl) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 1 and 7 meeting jointly) (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of.consolidat~on (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board) (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 3 and 11 meet jointly) (24) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 ~· Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Selection u Committee re award of contract for engineering services re design \...,,) of· Santa Ana River Siphon . See page "Q" (b) Consideration of Resoi'ution No. 79-37, approving agreement with L. D. King, Inc. for engineering services re design of Santa Ana River Siphon for a lump sum amount of $8,500.00. See page "R" (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 5 and 6 meet jointly) (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board· -staff suggests that Districts 1 and 7 meet jointly) (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda i terns, if any V (30) DISTRICT 11 Considcratibn of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff sugge!->ts that Districts 3 and 11 meet jointly) -6- .... (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from The Irvine Company dated February 20, 1979, re financial assistance in connection with construction of a gravity tunnel system in Jamboree Road. See page "S" (32) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by , the Board -staff suggests that Districts 5 and 6 meet jointly) -7-: .,,,,. " -: 1 _ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE MARCH 14,, · 1979 -t:30 P .M. . .-- ADJOUl!t .. MENTS ............ ..... COMP·:& MllEAGE ..... ~- FfLES stt UP ...••. ~ ..... ,,,, RESOlUflONS CEaTIFIED .• ~ .--------------------------LElTERS WRrtrat_..... ........ MINUTES WfUTI'EN~-ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR~ APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD, IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAiLABLE AT /:00 ~~M. IMMEDIATELY · PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. MINUliS fftm ' < (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) ·Appointment of Chairmen pro-·-temj · if· necessary . . (4) Recognition of special guests .(6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving.minutes of the;following meetings, as mailed: \~-·· .. -l7) LETiER --- A/C _lKUl - District 1 Februa-ry -14,-:1979, -regular .and February 22, 1979, adjourned District 2 -February 14, 1979, regu_lar District 3 -February 14, 1979, regular District S -February 14, 1979, regular District 6 -February -14, 1979, regular Distr.ict 7 February .14, 1979, regular .· ::::. Distcict 11 -February 14, 1979, regular ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: ((!}) Joint Chairman (00) General Manager @) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll.call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ROLL CALL vorE.,----71-the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall '....,_/ (9) be.called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "8" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "8" · and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all .motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar . . -~ ·~Y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * \...,I Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from M\~ Ron Call Vote or Cast unanimous Ballot the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FILE ................. . LETTER ····-········ A/C .... TICU -· FILE .................• ~V./ ~__/ flLE ···-·-·-- LETTER·····-··-~ .__/' ~:~Y .F..t\!.~~- Fil!-- GV-Ll~ .. -:.. LETTER ···-··-·- A/C •... TKLR _ ~-··-~ LETTER ....... ·-·- A/C •••• TKLR ·- vf°.D. ... ~l?'CL- FIL! __ ... LETTER t.L_ FILE--·- LETTER -·-·· .. ··- A/C ••.. TKLR -· Dt. m::.J?.~ ··-. FILE --- LETTER -- A/C •.•. TKLR - ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No . J-6-lF, authorizing an addition of $1,644.24 to the contract with Caliagua, Inc. for field modifications to adapt piping requirements to existing conditions, and granting a time extension of 18 c a l endar days for said work. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-30, accepting Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, as complete; authorizing execution of a No tice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-31, approving plans and specifications for Digesters 5 and 6, "C" and "D", "F" and "G", Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-061, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: 5/1/79) See page "G" (d) Consid eration of Resolution No. 79-32 , approving plans and specifications for Under~rain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (T entative bid date 5/1/79) See page "H'' (e) Con s idera tion of motion authorizing the s taff to s olicit proposals for engineering services in connection with de s igri of Hydraulic Reliability at Plant No. 1 in accordance with the established procedures for se l ection of profess ional engineering and architectural servi ces (f) Consideration of motion authori z ing formation of an Energy Managem ent Task Force, and authori z ing the General Manager to engage John Carollo Engineers to-prepare an energy management plan, on a per .diem fee basis , for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000 (g) Con s ideration of Resolution No. 79-33, approving and authorizing execution of Addendum No. 4 to agreement with .John Carollo Engineers/Greeley & Hansen for design of 75 MGD Ac tivated Sludge Treatment Fa cilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 relative to preparation of an Operationsand Maintenance Manual for said faci lities, on a per di em fee basis, for a maximum a dditional amount not to exceed $75 ,000. See page "I" (h) Con s ideration of motion authorizing the Ge neral Manager to n egotiate and award a purchase order contract f or TV inspection of the Ellis Avenue Force Main, for an am ount not to exceed $8,000 (i) Consideration of motion dec laring intent t o make any sa lary a djustments agreed to for l aboratory and ins trumentation r eclassifications , pursuant to existing Memorand a o f Und erstanding, effective March 9, 19 79 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) LmER ······~······ FILE···-- LETTER ···---·- A/C .... TKLR - ~~6 ·LmER -······-···· A/C .•. sv ·--··········--····--. ---------·-- FILE ----·-- LETTER···--- A/C ..•. TKLR ·-· ~::~.::·.l~= FILE ·······-·--· ~-11"" A/C ___ TKLR ··- FILE --- LETTER~---. ' A/C •. TKl. ·······-·······-····- FILE.--- LETTER ···-··-·- A/C ····/~v LrL .r.:D FILE ---- LETTER ···---- A/C ••. .TKL R - FILE -····-···- LETTER···--- A/C ... ~ ALL DISTRICTS (Continue d) (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-34, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with The Irvine Company re Districts' sewage solids processing and disposal operation at County's Class II-2 landfill site. See page "J" (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to purchase a corrosion-proof tank for polymer storage from Core-Rosio ~ Products of Panorama City, for an amount not to exceed $7,589 .00 p l us tax and freight DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor in accordance with the established procedures for se l ection of professional engineering and architectural services DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of pump parts for.the Seal Beach Pump Station to Flo-Systems, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $7,804 .00 plus freight (n) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Erwin Hinden--dba Bill 's Family Restaurant, dated -February 1, 1979, in the .amount of $12,265.35 in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and refer to contractor and .Districts' liability cl a ims a dministrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 5 (o) Consideration of motion "to receive a nd .file Draft Environme ntal Impact Re p ort for Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (copy enclosed with agenda material) (p) Consideration of motion authori z ing the Ge neral Mana ger to n e gotiat e and aw a rd pu~chase of -pump part s for the Bay Bridge Pump Station to Flo-Systems, Inc., for an amount not to e xceed $9,157 .00 plus freight DISTRICT 11 (q) (1) Consideration of motion ·to rec eive and file l"e tter from the City of Huntington Beach, dated March 7, 1979, reques ting modifica tions to proposed r e imbursement a gr eement re Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Phase II . See p age "K" (2) Con s ide ration of motion approving modification of the Master Pla n re Warn e r Avenue Relief Se wer (3) Consideration of motion rea ffirming declared inte nt to ente r into s t and a rd r e imburseme nt agreement with City o f Huntington Be ach .for design and con s truction of Warner Av enue Reli e f Se we r, Ph ase II , as modifie d END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -4- (10) ALL DlSTRlCTS ( 11) m~ (12) FILE LETTER ._ A/C ...• TKLR -· Con sjderatjon of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DJS '!'IUC TS Rep ort of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Conunittee's written report ALL DISTRICTS Con s ideratio n of action on items recommended by the Executive Couunittee: Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Southern California Associatjon of Governments dated Februa ry 13, 1979, requesting action by the Board to adopt resolution committing implementation of those cleme nts in the South Coast Areawide ll':l ste Treatment Management Plan under the jurisdiction of the County Sanitation Di s tricts of Orange County. See page "L" I ~b) FIL! -·-··-···-/ I)'\ p ~Ot~ Rolf Ca ll Vote or Cast A/C ••.. ltR ·•·· Unani mou s Ball ot Consideration of Reso l ution No. 79-35, committing to the implem e ntation and e n fo rcement of those elements of the South Co as t Areawide Management Plan appropriate to the jurisdiction of the County Sanitation Districts of Ora~ge County .• See page "M " ·······-······---······ ------··············-(13) ALL DISTRICTS FILE -···-·--·-··- LETTER ............•• >JC _.TKlR - ·------_ .............. -... ·- Con s ideration of items re award of contract for Insta l lation of Gas Engine s with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No . J-3-1 : (deferred from 2/14/79 meeting) M\S Cb) Consideration of motion to receive · and file letter from Pascal & Ludwig, I n c., dated March 1 , 1979, withdrawin~ their request to be relieved of t h eir bid on Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3 7 1. See page "N" Roll Ca ll Vote or Cast Unanimous Ba ll ot Consideration of Resolution No. 79-36, to receive and file bid tabul a tion and recommendation and a warding contract for Insta llation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Ro~hrock Outfall Booste r Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. in the amount of ·$247,225.00. See pages 11 0 11 and "P" ~ ALL DISTRICTS \.J.b Con sider a tion of motion to receive and file fin ancial report o f Divector !Y/ of Finance f or 6-month period ending December 31s t (copy e nclosed with agenda ma teri'.11) FILE --- ALL DISTRICTS . LEmR-- A/C .... TKLI -Receive staff report re potential c0p s olidation saving s and take under {'f\ submi ss ion (report enclos ed with agenda material) fl\.£·---- LETTER --- A/C .•.. Tl<LR ·- ~ ALL DISTRICTS Report of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. on statu s of r e v e nue prog r a m (written material included in Executive Committee Report) (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other bu siness and c ommunications or s upp l emen tal agenda items, if any -·-··-·····--·-··-('(\ \'S (17-a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the ITEMS O N fllE ·---·-SUl'l'LEMENTAL AGE NDA LETTER -- A/C .••• TKLR - ·······-··04·--___ ...- ~ \~7-b) ~jlf?:J:~T~~~GENDA E . A/C .... T~tf-. -~--~~a ll Vote or Cast ···-···----·""""".JJnanimous Ballot plans and specifications for Operations Center for 75 MGD Improve\! Treatment at Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-23-5, authorizing an addition in the amount of $59,874 .35 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, In c. for miscellaneous revisions and modifications and granting a time extension of 220 days for completion of the additional work . Sec page "I" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-38, accepting Operations Center for 75 MGD Improv e d Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-S, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Comp l etion; and approving Final Closeout /,greement 1;hich assesses the amount of $5 ,700 in liquidat ed damages pusuant to the provisions of said contract for unauthorized delay in completing the i.ork. See page "II" -5- (18) DISTRICT 1 Oth e r business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DIS TRICT 1 Consideration ~tros oar ~ DISTRICT 2 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn tA. _ /'-. /"'""'\ /""\ to/e,yiew ~~ o so · ~~. 'tf'me aifcf'plac~ be"'de t ermine-cf by e Board) <6 ·. I ~ (22) DISTRICT 3 Oth e r business and communications or supplemental agend a items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Con s ideration of motion to adjourn ~~ ~ to'-= ev ;Lew-~he \PlJP S an ~ns of co~olidatioH,__(Date ,tiJJ\e "ilTf-cf" pla~ t O'i)e d~ine d-b f "t-11.W oard .>s-t:-af f suggests-that "Bistricts '-3-and" 11 me et jointly) ~:I~ (24) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (a) (b) ~oll Call Vote or Cast unanimous Ballot Considerat-ion ·of motion to receive and file report of Selection Committee re award of contract for engineering services re de s ign of Santa Ana River Siphon . Se e page "Q" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-37, approving a gr eement with L. D. King , Inc. f or e ngineer ing services re d e sign o f Santa An a River Siphon for a lump s um amount of $8 ,500.00. See page "R" (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental -agenda items, if any · (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~t~e cons ·:-qa tion (Jl a{e, timyap.d -pl ~ -to by~mined by ge s t's._:t.hm" Dis't.r~ 5 ~ me 6.t-.f6 intly) &':; f (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communic a t i ons -or supplemental--agenda i tems,-if any (2 8 ) DISTRICT 7 Con s ide ration of motion to adjourn ~ t'O'-r-e v i ew the ~ros ~ cons /()°1\.. cons ~ation .kDl\_te, ti~d pl ~~to ~~yrmin e d by t'h.e..--B'O ar~taf f-..-su-(g e st ~th at Di'st.ri-efs 1 cffi d_...:r mee t-j ointly) );,' ;t:j {29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and conununi cations or s uppleme nta l ag enda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn o --·r o:rev.ie t.Jre J\ros ~Q\cons of co olidati911-Q>~te, .~E\ and plac ~ to b ~~termi~ed-by t~oard \....3;t f f s u g sts---fhat Di.st-net s ka.na_:..u: meeMointly )? ·If -6- ---·•u•••"'••••• ---····-········· DISTRICT 5 ·Consideration of motion to receive and fil e l e tter from 1be Irvine Company dated Fe bruary 20, 1 979, r e financial assistance in conn ection with con s truction of a gravity tunnel system in Jamboree Road. See page "S" (32) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or suppl eme ntal agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 Con sider a tion of motion to adjourn t ~ ~·e¥ie-w--th e 1 pro yan.~ cons g;f--c~nsolida_>.i-qp (D at~me an ~J.ace to/f)e"d IB.Pmrn e-d.-br 't.heBoai\J......:__s-i'aff sll-gge.s-t'S th~t ric ~d 6 me~joi n tly) g·~ -7- ·? :_ ~ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ~t n 0 (g ~ ~ 'fl--v-.J ~ ~· ~ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California k Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 71.C 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE MARCH 14., 1979 -?-:30 P .M. ANY· DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM., PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR, APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION., STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY. PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary . . (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See SHpplemeRt&l ageRea · _(6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -February 14, 1979, regular and · February 22, 1979, adjourned District 2 -February 14, 1979, regular District 3 -February 14, 1979, regular District 5 -February 14, 1979, regular District 6 · -February 14, 1979, regular Distr.ict 7 -February 14, 1979, regular District 11 -February 14, 1979, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager ,,J'\ wr.~ ~r~L~ (c) General Counsel tJ..-l .... ._;. f 1 l--~ ....... fil..<.L._~ -, C) "" (8) ALL DISTRICTS LCALLVOTE Co~sideration of roll.call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ROL ·----the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall ""'-" (9) be.called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" · and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( Q ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public \<1ho wish to remove an i tern from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, authorizing an addition of $1,644.24 to the contract with Caliagua, Inc. for field modifications to adapt piping requirements to existing conditions, and granting a time extension of 18 calendar days for said work. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-30, accepting Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-31, approving plans and specifications for Digesters 5 and 6, "C" and "D", "F" and "G", Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-061, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: 5/1/79) See page "G" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-32, approving plans and specifications for Underdrain System for Digester Cleaning Beds at Reclamation Plant No. I, Job No. Pl-17, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for ·receipt of bids (Ten ta ti ve bid date 5/ 1/79) See page "H" -- (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with desigri of Hydraulic Reliability at Plant No. 1 in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services (f) Consideration of motion authorizing formation. of -_Bll: Energy _ Management Task Force, and authorizing the General Manager to engage John Carollo Engineers to prepare an energy_ management plan, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not ·to exceed $25,000 (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-33, approving and authorizing execution of Addendum No. 4 to agreement with John ~arollo Engineers/Greeley & Hansen for design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 relative to preparation of an Operationsand Maintenance Manual for said facilities, on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum additional amount not to exceed-$75;000. ··See page "I" (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award a purchase order contract for TV inspection of the Ellis Avenue Force Main, for an amount not to .exceed $8,000 (i) Consideration of motion declaring intent to make any· salary adjustments agreed to for laboratory and instrumentation reclassifications, pursuant to existing Memoranda of Understanding, effective March 9, 1979 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR conti"nued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-34, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with The Irvine Company re Districts' sewage solids processing and disposal operation at County's Class II-2 landfill site. See page "J" (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to purchase a corrosion-proof tank for polymer storage from Core-Rosin Products of Panorama·City, for an amount not to exceed $7,589.00 plus tax and freight DISTRICT 2 (I) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services DISTRICT 3 (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of ·pump parts for-·the Seal Beach Pump Station to Flo-Systems, Inc., for an amount .not to exceed $7,804.00 plus freight (n) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Erwin.Hinden dba Bill's Family Restaurant, dated February 1, 1979, in the amount of $12,265.35 ..in..connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and refer to contractor and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action DISTRICT 5 Go) Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft .. Environmental Impact Report for Bayside Drive Trunk .Sewer (copy enclosed with agenda material) (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and ·award purchase.of ·pump parts· for the ·Bay Bridge Pump Station to Flo-Systems, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $9,157.00 plus freight DISTRICT 11 (q) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City.of Huntington Beach, dated March 7, 1979, requesting modifications to proposed reimbursement agreement re Warner Avenue Re lief Sewer, Phase II. See page "K" (2) Consideration of motion approving modification of the Master Plan re Warner Avenue Relief Sewer (3) Consideration of motion reaffirming declared intent to enter into standard reimbursement agreement with City of Huntington Beach.for design and construction of Warner Avenue· Relief Sewer. Phase II, as modified END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -4- II (10) (11) ALL DI STlllCTS -Consjderatjon of items deleted from consent c a l endar, if any ALL DJS'!'IUCTS Report of the Executive Committee and conside r ation of motion to r eceive and file the Conuni ttee' s written report (12) ALL .DI STRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) (b) Consideration of motion to re c eive and file letter from Southern California Associat j on of Governments dated February 13, 1979, r equesting action by the Board to adopt reso l ution committing implementat ion of those elements i n the South Coast Areawide \l'aste Treatment ~lanagement Plan under the jurisdi ction of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. See page "L" Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 79-35 , commi tting to the impleme ntation and enforcement of those elements of the Sou th Coast Areawide Mru1agement Plan appropriate to the jurisdiction of the County Sanitation Dis tri cts of Ora~ge County. • See page "M" (1 3 ) ALL DISTRIC TS Consideration of items re award of contract for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfal l Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1: (deferred from 2/14 /79 meeting) (a) (b) Consideration of motion to receive · and file l e tter from Pasca l & Lud wig , Inc., dated Mar c h 1, 1979, withdrawing the ir request to be relieved of t heir bid on Install ation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3 7 1. See page "N" Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 79-36, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awa rding contract for Installation of Ga s Engines with Gear Drives at-Rothrock Outfal l Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludw ig, Inc . in the amount of $247,225 .00. See pages "0" and "P" (14) AL L DISTRICTS Con sideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Di 1·ector of Finance for 6-month period ending December 31st (copy enclosed with agenda material) (1 5) ALL DISTRICTS Receive staff repor t re potential CA1~s olida ti on savings and take un der submission (report enclosed with agenda material) (1 6) ALL DISTRICTS Report of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. on status of r evenue program (written material included in Executive Committee Report) (1 7) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supp l emental agenda items, if any (17-a) ITEMS OH SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (17-b) ITTMSOM SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Roll Call Vote or Cast Unan imous Bo::ut Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the pl ans and specifications for Operations Center for 75 MGD Improve9 Treatme nt at Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-23-5, authorizing an addi tion in the amount of $59,874 .35 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, I nc. for misce ll aneous revisions and modifications and granting a time extension of 220 days ·for completion of the additional work. See page "!" Consideration of Resolu tion No . 79-38, accepting Operations Cente r for 75 MGD Improv ed Treatment a t Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-23-5, as complete ; authorizing execution of a Not ice of Completion; and approving Final Clo seout Agreement which assesses the amoun t of $5,700 in liquidated damages pus uant to t he provisions of said contract for un a uthorized delay in comp l eting the v.·ork. See page "II" -5- _.... ' . -. -~ (18) (I~.) (20) DISTRICT 1 Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 1 and 7 meeting jointly) ~','YD DISTRICT 2 9ther business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board) ~-.~ (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 3 and 11 meet jointly) . ~ '. '1-I (24) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Other business and co~ications or supplemental agenda items, if any (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Selection Committee re award of contract for engineering services re design of Santa Ana River Siphon . See page "Q" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-37, approving agreement with L. D. King, Inc. for engineering services re design of Santa Roll Ca~I Vote or Cast Ana ·River Siphon for a lump sum amount of $8 500. 00. Unanimous Ballo& S "R" 1 · ee page ___ _ (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board ~ staff suggests that Districts 5 and 6 meet jointly) (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board· -staff suggests that Districts 1 and 7 meet jointly) (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and connnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 3 and 11 meet jointly) -6- ~-e T ...... (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from The Irvine Company dated February 20, 1979, re financial assistance in connection with construction of a gravity tunnel system in Jamboree Road. See page "S" (32) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to to review the pros and cons of consolidation (Date, time and place to be determined by the Board -staff suggests that Districts 5 and 6 meet jointly) -7- II BOARDS .O F DIRE CTO RS County Sani ta tion Districts of Orange County, Cal ifornia JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITE MS MARCH 14) 1979 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTR I CTS Pos t O ffice Box 8 127 108 44 Ellis Ave nue Founta in Volley, Cali f ., 92708 Teleph::ines: Area Code 7 1 4 5 40-29 10 962-241 1 AGENDA (1 7-a ) Co n sideration of motion approving Change Or der No . 3 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center for 75 MGD I mproved Treat ment a t Pl ant No . 2 , Job No. P2 -23-5, authorizing an addition in t he amount of $59 ,874.35 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc . for misce ll aneous revisions and modifi cations and granting a t i me exten s i on of 220 days for co mp l eti on of the add ition a l wo r k . See p age "I" (1 7-b ) Co n siderat ion of Resolution No. 79-38, accepting Operations Center fo r 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Pl ant No . 2 , Job No. P2-23-5, as c omp l ete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and app r oving Final Closeout Agreement which assesses the amount of $5,700 in liqu idated damages pusuant to the provisions of said con tract for unauthorized de l ay in comple t ing t h e work. See page "I I " • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -1084~ ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270~ CHANGE ORDER . GRANT NO._· __ c_-_OG_-_1_0_7_3-_1_2_0 ___ _ C.O. N0. _____ 3 ______________ __ ~NTRACTOR: · · Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. ·oATE ______ ~ __ M_a_r_c_h~l_3~, __ 1_97_9 ________ _ JOB: OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD OF IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) {DEDUCT) $ 59,874.35 In accordance with contract provisions~ the following changes in the contr,ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved •. ITEM 1: . The requirements for painting the underside of the ITEM 2: ITEM 3: ITEM 4: "1-1" roof deck of cart parking storage ~or Operat1ons .center was omitted from original contract documents. Painting of ·this surface is necessary for corrosion protection. Total added costs this change The originally specified camber for reinforced concrete fascia beam of 114" was reduced to ~" or less by providing fabricated structural steel supports at intermediate columns and reducing clear span to 30 ft. The purpose of this change was to increase stiffness of this beam in order to minimize problems of glass fra."lling of windows. atta~hed to this beam. This procedure has minimized the probability·of window glass.failing and on fall out of window panes under the response of seismic loads on this beam. Total added costs this change The planters on the east, south and west s~de of the Operations Center were not detailed with weepholes to provide free drainage for: .. plant watering. Full length 6" thick gravel filters were placed in each planter and gravel drainage dissipators provided at each of 3 core drilled weepholes. This procedure provides the proper planting environment compatible with specified planting for the planter boxes. Without this drainage, plant growth could not be sustained. · Total added costs this change The natural gas pipe line from existing utility tunnel designed to supply Operation5 Center was incorrectly labelled on contract drawings as 11.i" and subsequently increased per design engineer to l~". This change was directed for approximately 750 L.F. of piping. Total addad costs this change AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $ 400.00 $2,410.00 $1,051.00 $ 97.99 "1-1" ' r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. · C-06-1073-120 C. 0. ·NO • __ 3 ________ __,,.t••~J .-CONTRACT OR : ___ P_a_s_ca_l_&_L_u_d_w_i_· g_,_I_n_c_. ______ _ DATE March 13, 1979 ----------------------------~ JOB: OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD OF IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5 ITEM s·: Approximately 3200 5.F. of 2" A.C. paving and 650 L.F. of 2"x4" redwood header.:was placed along_S' wide drainage ditch on roadway east of Operations Center building. This ditch originally was indicated to be graded earth and was des.igned to conduct parki.ng lot and excess berm irrigation runoff to selected catch basin outlets located along the ditch at various points. The grades of surrounding area are so flat that proper drainage runoff was not being obtained in the graded earth drainage ditch. Puddling and ponding were causing incipient damage to. existing roadway paving. The A.C. paving and head~r change was directed to correct this condition. · .. Total added cost of this change ITEM 6: ·The entire main entrance of asphalt paving at Plant ITEM 7: No. 2, ·which had failed prior to P2-23 construction contracts was broken, removed and disposed of off site. The existing subgrade was excavated to accommo- date a revised 4" A.C. on 12" C.R.B. paving section required to adequately sustain anticipated wheel loads. Portions of unsuitable subgrade were required to be . overexcavated and recompacted using recoverable C.R.B. Approximately 10,000 S.F. of new A.C. paving was removed and installed Total added cost of this change Two of the long span roof joists were modified to increase their originally designed carrying capacity. Final determination of additional loads imposed by the new site model for Plant 2, to be installed under P2-23-6 contract were determined after bid and the required modifications to roof joists were performed, Total added cost of this change ITEM 8: Provided approximately 15000 S."F. of 3" A.C. paving "l-2" .on 4" C.R.B. paving for access road and parking for District's Contract Administration Trailer site at Plant No. 2. Additional site clearning, approximately 1,000 C.Y. of compacted fill and culverts for drainage were included in this work. Total added cost of this change AGENDA ITEM #17(A) ALL DISTRICTS $3,430.51 $19,790.22 $ 778.00 $14,320.54 "1-2" .. - :. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page,3 .. CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT OR : ___ P_a_s_c_a_l_&_L_u_a_w_i_g_,_r_n_c_. _____ _ GRANT NO.~_c_-_o_G_-_1_07_3_-_1_2_0~~-- c. o. -N0.~~3~--~--~~--~~ DATE_~~~-M_a_r_c_h~l_3_,_1_9_7_9 __ ~-- J 08 :_o_P_E_RA_T_1_o_N_s_c_E_N_T_E_R_-_1_s_M_G_o_o_F_I_M_P_R_o_v_E_· o_T_RE_A_T_ME_·_N_T ___ A_T_P_LA_N_T_N_o_. _2_, _J_o_B_N_o_._P_2_-_2_3_-_s __ ITEM 9:. Two additional openings were provided in the exterior walls of the Operations Center Building to acconunodate electrical and digital conduits. These were omitted from original contract drawings but required for P2-23-6 contract work. Total added cost. this· cha.nge ITEM 10: Additional reinforcing steel was required.to be placed around heating, ventilating and electrical opening in slab at Elevation 11.0. The opening was not shown ITEM 11: on structural drawings and appeared on electrical only. This reinforcing steel is required to properly compensate for rebar ·interrupted by this openi_ng, . Total added cost this change The original intent of the electrical lighting design was to have included_ pilot lights for touphplates in the lighting system. This was n.ot set forth clearly in the origi~al contract drawings. This change order rectified th.is condition which required additional equipment and wiri_ng., Total added cost this ch~nge -ITEM 12: Provided car bumper stops and lane striping in parking lots north and south of Operations Center omitted from both l'2-23.-l and P2-:-23-5 Floodwall and Operations Center contract drawings, Required for protection of existi_ng improvements and safety. Total added cost this cha.nge ITEM 13: In order to accommodate mechanical piping.within originally contemplated structural beam and slab design and to maintain structural integrity of R.C. beams the men's and women's restroom were transposed to relocate piping in non-structural elements. 'J.1hese ~=chitectural and mechanical piping changes allowed this reconciliation. Total added cost this change "1-3" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $ 113.00 $ 142.44 $1,780.48 $ 625.00 $1,558.35 "I-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0 • l3 0 X 8 12 7 -l 0 8 'f 4 E LL I S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page .. 4 .. CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.~c_-_o_G_-1_0_7_3_-_1_20~--- c .o. N0·~-3~~~~~---\.-J=- CONTRACTOR: __ ~ ___ P_a_s_c_a_·1 __ & __ L_u_a_w_i_g_, __ I_n_c_. ________ ~--DATE ________ M_a_r_c_·h __ l_3_, __ 1_9_7_9 ______ __ J 0 B : __ o_P_E_· RA __ T_I_O_N_s_c_E_N_T_E_R __ -__ 7_S_M_G_o_o_F_· _I_M_P_R_o_v_E_· o_T_RE_ ... _A_T_M_E_N_T_A_T_P_LA_l_~T_N_o_. _2_,_J_O_B_N_o_._P_2_-_2_3_-_s_ ITEM 14: Installation of approximately 200 S.F. of additional quarry tile in ~aboratory conference rooms. a) Portions of necessary quarry tile were omitted from original contract drawings under center islands and along certain portions of boundary cabinetry. This.additional tile was directed to be installed to provide caustic spillage protection and to provide continuity of floor covering in the event p~esently designed cabinetry required modifications in the future. Added cost this change $1,158.SQ b) Approximately 3' additional width of quarry tile was placed in the conference room's proposed ,,. eati.ng and vending machine dispensing area. The originally designed width of tile was not adequate to acconunodate table width and beverage dispensers without adding the additional 3' widt~. Added cost this change $ 800.00 Total added cost this change ITEM 15: ·Additional hot air plenum controls were provided to more accurately maintain hot deck temperatures in the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems. The purpose of the installation is cost. savings in energy by controlling the rate of frequency of cycling of room temperature called by thermostat reaction. These controls were not originally specified but are cost effective. Total added cost this change ITEM 16: Furnished and installed two wall louvers .for HVAC system in conference room and original computer room. These louvers were omitted from.contract drawings based on the engineers ~oncept that the attic space in hallway constituted an enclosed return air plenum. This was not the case. The two vents originally omitted in contract drawings were one 6"xl2" and one 12"x48" which installed under this change. Total added cost this change "1-4" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $1,958.50 $ 907.65 $ 306.00 u "l-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 5' CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ c_-_06_-_1_0_7_3-_1_2_0 ____ __ ~ C.O. NO._. ___ 3 ____ ~-----~~ CONTRACTOR: ______ P_a_s_c~a=l......;;.&_L~u=d~w~1~·9~,r__;;I~n~c~.;..._---------.-DATE _________ M_a_r_c_h~l_3~'~1_9_7_9 ____ ___ JOB!. OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD OF IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5 ITEM 17: The originally designed catch basin discharge p,iping facilities could not be installed as designed due.to changed conditions in the field resulting from physical interference with preexisting utilities ·discovered during field checking for elevation of ·these utilities. A revised lowered invert elevation was not compatible with existing ground conditions nullifying lowering of the line to permit passage. ·The only alternative was to revise·c.B. collection system and by adding additional piping provide outleting for the system to an existing riser on Miller-Holder sewer Total added cost this change ·ITEM 18: Relocation of Utility Blower. Relocate 1500 C.F.M. r utility blower in Operations Center basement from originally designed location to an alternate location. The size of the blower in its original position was such that it interferred with electric cabinet in the transformer room. Work included revision in duct work and electrical fixtures interfering ··with path of revised ducts. Total added cost this change ITEM 19: Polyurethane Painting of Exterior Doors. Coated seven exterior wood doors on Operations Center with polyurethane paint. The wooden doors were delivered as specified. The finish began to show accelerated signs of weathering ~ue to the very corrosive marine environment. The painting was accomplished to arrest the weathering process. Total added cost this change ITEM 20: Additional Gas Regulators. The existing pressure of the natural gas system in the plan~ is in excess of 100 psi. The specifications did not address themselves to this fact and post biqding evaluation resulted in ·requiring "l-5" .. ·installation of two gas pressure regulations and one ·~District furnished precise reduction regulation. · The · · boiler and laboratory required gas pressures not to exceed 7" of water. Total added cost this change AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $6,000.00 . . $ 736.86 $ 316.00 $1,148.00 "1-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ~ Page ·"6 --°' CHANGE ORDER. GRANT No C-06-1073-120 ·-------------------c. o. N0. ____ 3 __ ~----~--~ DATE March 13, 1979 \...) CONTRACTOR: __ ~_P_a_s_c_a_l __ & __ L_u_dw __ ig~'-I_n_c_. ____ ~--~~-- OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD OF IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5 ITEM 21: Installation of pressure activated water regulating valve for air conditioning unit. Installed one Penn V46AS-2 2 inch f lan_ged commercial type pressure activated water regulating valve. This unit is required to maintain constant condenser water ·~temperature. This was an omission from original contract drawings. . Total added cost this change · · ITEM 22: Provide addition supports to strengthen toilet partitions. The toilet partitions as designed and set forth in original drawings were not adequately stiffened because of the length of the partitions. r Tpese partitions were modified to provide adequate · supp0r~ for the system. Total added cost this change ITEM 23: Miscellaneous force account work related to contract work at Plant No. 2. II 1-6" a) The contractor was directed to load, haul, and dispose of approximately 10.loads of District generated trash and debris along with contractors hauling off operations for Districts convenience. Added cost this change · $879.41 b) The District forces had placed additional earth fill around service center building to remove the safety hazard of short berm slopes in turn around area north of this building. District did not have final grading equipment available to properly finish grade the additional fills and the contractor was directed to perform this work with his forces. Added cost this change $208.89 c) District directed contractor to dewater a~d pump out electrical manholes constructed under P2-23-l -contract and accepted by the Districts approximately 1 year ago. The District berm irrigation system and grading in vicinity caused direct flooding into these manholes. P2-23-3 Electrical subcontractor was pulling cable under its contract through these manholes and required dry working conditions. District operations personnel were not available for this work at this .particular time. Added cost this'.change $361.41 AGENDA ITEM #17(A) ALL DISTRICTS $ 511. 76 $ 653 .. 20 II 1-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG~ COUNTY P • 0 • B 0 X 8 12 7. -1 0 8 '+ 4 ELL I S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 7' CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ c_-_oG_-_1_0_1_3-_1_2_0 ____ __ \...,)CONTRACTOR~ C.O. ·No. __ 3 ______ _ DATE~~-----M_a_r_c_h~l-3_,_1_9_7_9~------------------------------------------Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD OF IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5 ITEM 2·3 (Continued} d) Certain portions of ·Road "C" paving sections required resurfacing an~ patching. The Districts directed the contractor to .make these repairs along with its contract restoration work for District convenience and cost savings. The ~ontractor equipment was moved on site and operating. Approximately 21 tons of trench and miscellaneous A.C. resurfacing was placed in this manner. Added cost this change $658.54 ~otal added cost this change, Items a, b, c, & d ITEM 24: Added drywall and studs Room 204. The heating, ventilating and air conditioning and electrical opening in Room 204 omitted a closure wall section from original contract drawings. This change order . ~ was· directed to provide closure for safety and esthetics. · Total added cost this change ITEM 25: Miscellaneous credits and added costs for deletion of contract work and modifications to architectural and finish details. "1-7" a) Deletions to carpeting, ceiling tile and base in Room 208 Credit this change . ($ 19.00) b) Deletion of carpet mat in conference room. Credit this change ($ 93. 00) c) Deletion of liquid waterproofing interior walls in Operations Center Credit this change ($1,444.·40) d) Added costs to landscape contractor for loss of ground cover. Excessive grit build up occurred in District provided plant water which plugged the automatic timed sprinkler irrigation system. Shutting down the system for repair deprived the plants of irrigation water for a period of approximately one week resulting in partial loss of recently planted ground cover. Added cost thi~ change $ 200.00 AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS .· $2,108.25 $ 87.00 ".1-7" • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 '""' --... Page 8 . . CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-120 .. ' C.O. N0. ___ 3~~----------~ DATE __ ~ ___ M_a_r_c_h __ l_3_,_1_9_7_9 _______ \,,,.r ___ · CONTRACTOR: ____ ~P~a~s~c~a=l;__-::&::.....=L~u~d~w~iq~,~I~n~c~.:--------------- JOB! OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD OF IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5 ITEM 25 (~ontinued) Total credit this change, Items a, b, c, & d ($,1356.40) TOTAL ADDITION THIS CHANGE $59,874.35 Extension of Contract Time . . The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for the completion of the above I:tems 1 through 25 . ~ : . 220 Calendar· Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Orig~nal Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Previous Time Extensions Total ·Time Extensions Revised Contract Time .Revised Contract Completion Date Time Exceeding Completion Date Final Project Clo~eout Date Board authorization d~te.· M h 14 1979 u . arc , PASCAL & LUDWIG, ."lNc.·· By 'f{ u~!-,k_ --contractor· July 6, 1977 240 Calendar Days March 2, 1978 220 Calendar Days 98 Calehdar·Days 318 Calendar Days 558 Calendar Days January 14, 1979 57 Calendar Days March 12, 1979 O~iginal Contract Price $ 1,149,296.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 42,000.00 This Cha.nge (ADD) ((Xf<6tbtfc'X) $ 59,874.35 Amended Contract Price $ 1,251,970.35 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By~'d \w) Chief Engineer II 1-8" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II I -8" ) ... RESOLUTION NO. 79-38 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-23-5 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-23-5 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6., 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, _DO HEREBY RESOLVE,. DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That, except ~s set forth in Section 6 hereo~, the contractor, Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for OPERATIONS CENTER FOR 75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO.· P2-23-5, on the 12th day of March, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineer, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract except as set forth in Section 6 hereof; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Operations Center for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated July 6, 1977, except as set forth in Section 6 hereof; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, "11-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "11-1" " ... Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Operations Center for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5, and assessing the contractor for liquidated damages for 57 days from January 14, 1979, the contractual completion date, to March 12, 1979, the actual date of completion of.work by the contractor, in the amount of $100 per day, for the total amount of $5,700.00, as provided in the plans and specifications for said contract, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California.· PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. II I I -2" AGENDA ITEM #17(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "II-2" ~, MANAGER'S AGEND A REPORT Coun t y San it ation Distr ict s of Ora ng e County, California JO INT BO A RDS Meeting Date March 14 , 1979 -7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 Th e followin g i s a brief explanation of the more important, non-rout i ne item s ·wh ich app ea r on the enc l os e d agenda and which are not otherwise s e l f-ex pl a n a tory . Ha rran t li s ts are enclosed with the agenda mat e rial summarizing the bill s paid since the l ast Joint Board meeting. To min imize the amount of redund ancy and dup li cation i n the agenda mat erial and r e duce the number of comments in the Manager 's Report, we h ave e xpande d the description of the a g end a ite ms in the agenda its elf, par t icular ly with re gard to chan g e orde rs and con- tra cts whi c h h ave be en publicly b id a n d are within the contract budg et or engineer's P-stim a te. Detaile d chang e orders are inc l uded in the support i ng mat erjal as well as the bid t a bulations for the contracts b e ing recorrnn ended for award. Joint Boards No. 9-a -Ch a nge Order No. 1 t o Job No. J-6 -lF. Durin g the installation of the d i gester gas piping system to supply the fuel for the Ocean Outfa l l Booster Pumpi n g Station Engines, the contractor was directed to make several field modific a tions to adapt the contract piping requirements to existing conditions. Labor and material s we r e e xpended in the amount of $1 ,644.24 in per- forming these required modifications. The staff recommends accept - ance of Chang e Order No. l which also gran t s a t ime ex tension of 1 8 calendar days t o the contract. No. 9-b -Acceptance of Job No. J-6 -lF -Digester Gas Piping at Ocean Outfall Pumpin g Station. The con t ractor has completed a ll work and the contractua l requi reme nts for this di g ester g as piping job at P l ant No. 2. The staff recommend s acc e pta nce of the work and the execution of the Final Clos e out Ag r e em e nt and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. ·' No. 9-c -Approving Plans and Spec ifications for Job No. PW-061 -Installation of Gas Mixing Compressors for Digester Circulatio n. L ast April, an award was made for the purchase of three gas mixing compressors to be utilized at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. The compressors have b een received and the s taff has prepared plans and specifications for the installation . The staff requests approval of the pl a ns and specifications and establishme nt of a tentative bid date of May 1. The engineer's estimate for this proje~t is $250,000 to provide gas mixing for six digesters. Pl -17. No. 9 -d -Approving Plans and Specifications for Job No. At the May, 1978 Board meeting, the Directors authorized the staff to prepare the plans and specifications for an underdrain syst em for the di geste r cle aning beds located at Recl amat ion Plant No. 1. This underdra in system will expedite th e cleaning of the digesters at Plant No . 1. This system is simil a r to the digester cleaning beds recent l y insta lled at Plant No. 2 . This item was included in the 1978 -79 CORF budget in the amount of $350,000. Th e staff recommends approval of plans and specifications and estab - l ishment of a tent ative bid date of May 1, 1979. No. 9-e ·-Proposals for Engineering Services for Des ign of !!Ydraulic ReliabIITty at Plant No. 1. It is the Di stricts ' staff 's intent to ma x imize the use of the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. The Plant is designed to accommodate 50 mgd ; we are proposin g that the facilities b e operated in a constant -flow mode, operating a t 60 mgd. The P lant No. 1 dive rsion structure permits us to be sel e ctive as to which in- coming sewage flows wi ll be treated at Plant No. 1 for reclamation purposes . In addition, with the rehabilitation of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station and Force Main, we are able to intercept reclaimable sewage flows from the Magnolia Trunk . To accommo d ate the additiona l flows which wil l be treated at Plant No. 1, it will be nec essa ry for us to upgrade the Plant No. 1 h eadworks. In this year 's budget, we have included funds to rebuild th e slud ge gas engines which will be removed fr o m the outfall booster station under Job No . J-3-1 for insta llation at the Plant No. 1 head- work s . We need t o modify and improve the g rit chambers and change the pump i mpe llers to ensure better hyd raulic reliability. Other mi sce llaneous work will includ e raising of the freeboard at the di stribution box and other related work to increase the capacity of existing facilit i es . . It is recomm ende d that these improvements be de s i g ned by out - side engineering firms. We seek authorization for the staff to -2- prepare a request for propos a ls to be forwarded to selected engineer - ing firm s pursuant to procedures for A-E services. This p ro ject is not grant eligible, but is a 1978-79 budgeted projec t of $1,100,0 00. No. 9-f -Fo rmation of Energy Management Task Force . In r ecent discussions with the Southern Ca li fornia Edison Company it appears that the Districts wi ll continually be subjected to in - creased energy costs due to time of use energy rates to be approved by the Public Utilities Commissio n . The increased rates will affect the use of electrical energy during the peak periods from 10:00 a .m., to 10:00 p.m. This high demand period of ele ctrica l energy co rres pond s with the high sewage flows received at the Di stricts ' treatment p l ant s. As additiona l facilities are comple ted and made operational, additional energy wil l be required in the form of e l ectrical energy, digester gas and diesel fue l. It is the staff's opinion that to maximize our own energy sources and minimi ze the use of purchased energy, a complete evaluation of different modes of operation needs to be made. The staff is recommending that an Energy Management Task Force be formed c onsist ing of the Districts ' Chief Eng i neer, Superin- tendent of Operations, several Supervisors and at times , the General Counsel, working in conjunction with th e various u tility companies . Th e staff will require ass istance from John Carollo Engineers in the pr eparation o f an energy management plan in order that our future requiremen ts can be projected. Since it i s difficult to scope the efforts of JCE in this matter, the staff is requesting that JCE be r e t ained on a per diem b as is in an amount not to exceed $2 5,000. A preliminary report wi ll be completed within six months ; however , suff icient information concerning next year 's requirements will b e developed to refl ect in the 1979-80 fiscal year budget . No. 9-g -Approvin g Amendment No . q. t o Engineering Agreeme nt for Job No. P2 -23 for the Preparation of the Operations and Ma intenance Manual . In the July, 1 976 agre ement with John Caro l lo Engineers/Greeley and Hans en, a joint venture, to design the 75 -mgd of Improved Treat- ment at Plant No. 2 , thr ee major a r eas of service were identified which were requi red for the project and to meet the State and Federal requir ements: (1) The contract was for the preparation of plans and specific ations for a ne go tiated fee not to exceed $2,594 ,000. The final cost for design servic es was $2,367 ,5 67. (2) In August, 19 77, an addendum to the original contract was authorized for the engineers to assist the staff in the construction phase of reviewing the con - tracto r 's operation, shop drawing review and preparat ion of addit i ona l sketch es required during construction. This addendum was for an amoun t not to exc eed $656 ,000 fo r the construction phase. (3) State and Federal regul ations require that an Operations and Mai n tenance -3 - Manual be prepared prior to the completion of t he construction contract. A draft report must be submitted when the construction i s 50% complete and the final manual prior to fina l acceptan ce of the contract work . It is estima ted that the total cost for this manual will be a p proxim a te l y $150,000 , including staff time , a nd wil l be f un ded 8 7 ~% by Sta te and F e d e ral g rants. The staff is recommending th a t another amendment be made to the eng ineer s ' contract at t h e preva iling rates stipul ated in the contrac t, in a max imum amou n t not to e xc e ed $75,000. This action is con s istent with the on-g oing s ervices provisions contained in the EP A r eg ulations a nd th e p r oc e dure s for the selection of A-E servic es adop ted b y the Bo ar d s . No . 9-h -Authorizing the Gen e r a l Mana g er to Award Contract for S ewer TV Inspec tio n of Ell i s Ave n ue Force Ma in. The reha bilitation o f th e Ellis Avenue Pumping Station to dive rt a pp rox i mate l y 19-mgd of s e wage from th e Ma gnolia Trunk to Pla nt No. 1 is n earing c omp l e tion. With the r e activation of this pumpin8 s t a tion, flows which are norma lly tributary to P l ant No. 2 can b e dive rted to Pla nt No. 1 for trea tment . Th e 36-inch force main from Ellis Ave nue to Brookhur s t Street was installed in 1953. Before this force main is pla ced in service , it wi ll be necessary to en s ur e th e int egrity o f th e sys t e m which will require p ressure testing a nd itis p e cting of t h e inte rior of the pipe by u se of sewer TV. Since the r e a r e a l i mit e d num ber of comp ani e s that provide this s ervice , the sta ff is r e comme nding th a t the Ge neral Man ag er be autho - rize d to n egotia t e a contrac t in a n a mount n ot to exceed $8,000 . We b e lieve in t hi s ca s e , a n ego t i ate d con t ract would be more econom ical than a public bid b e cause th e competition is so limited. No. 9 -i -La bor a tory and In s trume ntation Retroactive Sala ry Adj u s t me n ts . Wh e n the Memo randa of Understa nding were executed with the La bora tory and Op e ration s a n d Maintenance Units , the Di s tric ts agre e d to conduct job valida t i on and job comparison studies for the La boratory and Instrumen t a tion personnel a nd to hold meet-and - confer se s s ions during the mo nths of February and March. Because of the pr ess o f other bus ine ss, mana gement has not b een able to com- plete th e requi r e d valida tio ns . We a re requesting that the Boards declare th e i r intent to make a ny pos s ible salary ad justments for thes e t wo g roups r e troactive t o Ma rch 9, 19 79. The a ctua l sa lary a dius tments, if a ny, wi ll not b e made until a u thori z ed by the Bo a rds . -4- No . 9-i -Ag r eement wit h Th e Irvine Comp any re Distr icts ' Sew a e Solids Processin' 0 eration at the Coote Can on Sanitar Lan il . Th e Coun ty 's Co yote Canyon sanitary l andfi ll s it e is owned by The I rvine Comp any . The State Solid Waste Management Control Board requires approval of the lan downer of our operation before a use p ermit c an b e i ssued . Th e Irvine Company h as r eq u ested that as a con d ition of grantin g their a pprova l , the District s enter into a n agreement with them establis hing the rights and conditions for pro- cessing s l udge at the l a ndfill site . Essentially, the agreement r eiterates the conditions of our agreement with the County and con- t ain s a h old h armless cl a use for any claims, demands or liability dama ges for injuries arising out of the Districts ' operations . The agr eement contains the same terminat ion date that is inc luded in the Co unty agreement, June 3 0, 1 98 1. · The s taff r ecommends approval of the agr eement at no cost t o th e Districts. No. 9-k -Purchase of 12,000 Ga llon Corrosion-Proof Tank for Pol ymer Storage . Th e staff h as solicited quotations from thr ee vendors to supp l y a 1 2 ,000 ga l l on f i berglass r einfo rced pl astic, f ila me nt round, flat bottom chemical storage tank for th e stor age of polyel e ctrolyt e u sed in the d ewater ing operation of digested sewage solids. The quotations r eceived were $7,5 89 , $8 ,034 and $9,728 . Th e staff, therefor e , recommends approval of the purchase o f thi s 12,000 ga ll on tank from Owe ns Corning Fiberglass Core -Rosin Products o f P anorama City in the amount of $7,58 9 plus tax and freight. District No. 2 No . 9 -1 -Soliciting P r oposal s for En g in eer ing Servi ces re Des ign of Carbon Canyon Darn Interceptor. Th e Carbon Ca nyon Dam Interceptor is a Ma s te r Pl anned s ewe r extending from th e exi s tin g fac ility i n Palm Drive, then north er l y appro ximately 11,0 0 0 f eet to intercept a n existing fo rce ma i n dis- charging from an existing pumpin g station on the northerly side of the Carb on Ca n yon Dam . This is a b ou t th e l a st rema inin g f a cility to be compl eted in the current Master Plan of Facilities wh ich s h ou ld provide trunk s ewer c apa city to accommodate flo ws to th e year 2000 . When contra ctual a rr angement s h ave b ee n comp l eted with the City of Bre a for a nn exation of incorporat e d a r eas above t he Dam to the District, improve d faciliti es will be n eede d to pump anti cip ate d f lows -5- over t h e Darn to the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor . Th is wi ll p ermit abandonment of the City of Brea oxidation ponds in Carbon Canyon which have been under criticism by the Regional Water Quality Contro l Board bec a u se of failure to meet the NPDES water quality requirements. The staff is r ecommending a request for proposals be sent out pursuant to the procurement procedures adopted by the Board and that they be r eferred to the Board's Selection Committe e for review and recom - mendation. Di str ict No. 3 No. 9 -rn -Authorizing Genera l Manager to Award Purc h ase of Pump Parts. The Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station which was constructed i n 1970 has two large (16 ") sewage pumps which do most of th e pumping , as wel l as two smaller (10") standby pumps (Fairbanks Morse Equipment). The 1 6 11 pumps are wearing to the point that replacement parts wil l soon be requi red to keep them opera tional. Bids for furnishin g thes e parts were received from two firms and it is the staff's rec omm endati on that the award be made to Flo - Systems, Inc ., of Burbank, not to exceed $7,804 plus freight, as the l owest and be st bid . (We are combining this purchase with parts re - quired for the District No. 5 Bay Bridge Pumping Station). District No. 5 No. 9 -o -Bayside Drive T runk Sewer . At the Di s trict 's adjourned r egular mee ting on January 23, a staff report and a Facilities Plan on the replacement of the Bayside Drive Trunk, prepared b y Scha ller and Lohr, Inc., were received and ordered filed . At that time, the staff wa s authorized to proceed with the preparation of an EIR for the projec t . Presented for the Board 's consideration is the draft EIR on the Bayside Trunk, prepared by K. P. L indstrom and Assoc iates . It is the staff 's recommendation that the Bo ard receive and fi l e the report for stu<ly , and if it is satisfactory , the Board, on April 11th (the n ex t Joint Board me e ting date) can establish a hearing date for public com..ment . No . 9-p -Authorizing Award of Purchase of Pump Parts for Bay_ Brid ge Pump Station . The Bay Bridge Pumping Station , which was constructed in 1 965, h ad two 1611 sewage pump s installed in 1971 to handle the i ncreasing sewage flows (Fairb a nks Morse Equipme nt). These pumps are wearing to the point t h at replacement parts wi ll soon be required to keep them operationa l . -6- -Bi d s for fu r nishing these parts were receive d f r om two firms a nd it is t he staff 's recomm e ndation that the award be made to Flo -Systems, I nc ., of Burbank, not to exceed $9,151 p l us frei g ht, as the lowest and best bid . (We are combining this purchase with parts required for t h e Di strict No. 3 Sea l Beach Boulevard Pumping Stat i on). Distr ict No . 1 1 No . 9-q -Modification of Master Plan and Reimbursement Agree - ment with the City of Hun tington Beach . The Direc t ors rec eive d and fi l ed a request from the City of Huntington Beach to ent er into an agreement with the District fo r the design and construction of the Warner Avenue Relief Trunk Sewer. In subsequent meetings between the staffs of both the City and the District, it became apparent that th e installation of the Coast Hi ghway Trunk Sewer through t he Bolsa Chica Wetlands area wil l b e delayed for several years and will not allow the City to mePt i ts needs to service the Huntington Harbour area . Both staffs have agl'.'eed that the most pr actica l approach is to ame nd the proposed Master Plan of the Dis - trict to tie a futur e portion of the Coast Highway Trunk in Los Patos Avenue to the Warne r Avenue Trunk Sewer sys tem. If and when the Coast Highway Trunk is constructed in or around the Bolsa Chica Wet lands area, that portion in Los Patos Avenue can be conr1 ecte d, thereby pro - viding flexibility to meet the current sewering needs of the drainage area. lt is , therefore, recommended that the District's Master Plan be amended to include the following sewer reaches: 1. 2. 3. 4 .. Los Patos Avenue from Marina View P l ace to Bolsa Chica Street . In Bolsa Chica Street from Los Pat os Avenue to Warner Avenue. I n Warner Avenue from Bolsa Chica Street to a p oint approximate l y 800-feet wes t er l y of GranEl ,i)~~ S t reet. The exis t ing Ci ty sewer in Warner Av enue fro m Al gonquin to Springdale, which was scheduled to b e purchased by the District from the City shou ld b e deleted from the District Master Plan if the above recormnended modifications a r e app r oved . The staff recomrnends the modifications to t h e Maste r P l an a s stated above and f u rth e r recommends that a standard reimbursement agreeme nt be entered into pursuant to the Board's intent in their a c tion of May, 1978 , with the changes as noted . -7- Join t Boards Nos. 11 & 12 -Report of the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee met on F eb ruary 28th and a r eport of their discus sions and recommendations is included for active Directors . No. 13 -Award of Contract No. J-3 -1 -Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station . At the February Board meeting , the staff reported that bids were rec eived for the installation of three Districts'-ovmed gas engines with gear drives at the Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, which ranged from a low of $247,225 to a high of $349,500. Pascal & Ludwig, Inc ., of Upland , who submitted the lowest bid, filed a letter with the Boards r equesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid since they dis - covered an error in the preparation of their final bid proposal . This matter was referred, at the February meeting, to the General Counsel for report and recommendation . The staff has received a letter from Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., dated March 1, which states that the contractor has resolved some o f the differences with the equipment supplier and that the now -projected defi cit amount is small enough and not worth further consideration by the Directors. This letter withdraws their request to be· relieved of their bid. Therefore, the staff recommends tha·t the award be made to Pascal & Ludwig for the above -mentioned project for the pr i ce stipu- lat ed in their bid proposal -$247 ,225 . No. 1 4 -Financial Report for Period Ended December 31, 1978. Enclose d with the agenda materia l is a financia l report from th e Director of Finance for the 6 -month period ended December 31, 1 978. If any Director h as any questions or wishes additional infor - mation, p l ease cal l Wayne Sylvester or Fred Harper, telephone 540 -2910 . No. 15 -Proposed Consolidation of the Districts . On February 14th, Chairman Don Smith of the Co mm ittee on Reorgani - zation (Con solidation) presented the Committee's report recommending th at the Boards hold meetings during the ensuing 45 days for the pur - po se of discussing the Committee's report and recommendations relative to con sol idation of the Distri cts . The staff was directed to prepare the enclosed information concerning the potential sav i ngs which might be realized as a result o f consolidation. No. 1 6 -Status of Revenue Program. The Districts ' consultants, Peat, Marwick , Mitchell & Company (PMM) have prepared a wr i tten status report on the Revenue Pro gram which is included in the Executive Committee report package . Mr . Bil l Butler of PMM will make a verbal pres e ntation to the Boards . -8 - Dis t r ic ts Nos . 5 and 6 No. 24 -Award of Engineer i ng Contract for Design of Santa Ana River Siph on . Pursua nt to the Directors ' action at the February Board meeting, the staff so licited proposals from four engineering firms to prepare the p l ans and specifications for the second barrel of the Santa Ana River Siph on , which is scheduled to b e constructed concurrentl y with the Flood Control District 's pro gram for the widening of the Santa Ana River. Thes e proposals we re received on March 1 a nd transmitted to the Sel ec tion Co mm ittee for their r eview . The Selection Committee is scheduled to meet at 7 :30 a .m., March 8, to consider the proposals submitted. The Selection Committee 's recommend at ion will be on the Supplementa l Agenda for the Directors ' consideration. Joint Boards Nos. 19,21,23,26 ,28,30,33 -Adjournments to Review Pros a nd Cons of Con sol idation of the Districts. I t has been suggested by the Co mmittee on Reo r ganizat ion that the Districts with small Boards combine their meetings with other Boards to cut down the ctmount of staff and Board mP.mber time for studying the recommendations of the Committee . It has been sugges ted '-" that Districts 1 and 7 meet to gether; Districts 5 and 6; and Districts 3 and 1 1. The District No . 2 Board would meet a lone. Th e staff s u ggests that the Boards meet during the weeks of March 26 and April 2 . Distri ct No . 5 No. 31 -Letter from The Irvine Company re Financing Proposed J amboree Trunk Sewer Construction . In response to the District 's request that The Irvine Compan y o ffer f i nancial assistance to the District for construction of the Jamboree Trunk Sewer project , The Irvine Com pany suggests that the exi stin g agreeme nt dated May, 1976 , be amended to up the cash advance for construction from $600,000 to $1 million, the current est imated cost of the gravity tunn e l project. The Dis t rict's Board may wish to receive and file The Irvine Company letter and discuss the offer at an adjourned meeting of the Board . In the meantime, the s t aff wi ll d evelop additional information rela t i ve to potential connection f ees wh ich may be gen erated i n t h e t ributary area . -9- Fred A . Harper Genera l Manager ·· ; P:genda I tern No. 14 •-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS March 8, 1979 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714)962-2411 Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1978 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the six months ended December-31, 1978, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first quarter of the 1978-79 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1978-79 budgets for all Districts is $125.3 million, of which approximately 84% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories.of the several Districts are set forth below. The summary reflects the revised budgets approved by the-Boards in September. Revised Summary of 1978-79 Budgets (In Millions of Dollars) Increase 1978-79 REVENUE 1977-78 1978-79 (Decrease) % of Budget Carry-Over & Construction Reserves $ ]3.4 $ 88.6 $ 15.2 70.7% Tax Al location 19.4 10.1 9.3) 8.1 Tax Levy (Debt) 2.0 1.9 . l) 1.S Federal & State Construction Grants 1z..2 . 13.7 .5) 10.9 Fees 3.9 4.6 .1 3.7 Sale of Capacity Rights .7 .3 .4) .2 Interest & Other Income 6.6 6.1 .5) ~ Total Funds Available $120.2 $125.3 $ s. 1 100.0% EXPENDITURES & RESERVES Joint Works Construction Programs $ 60.8 $ 78.8 $ 18.0 62.9 % District Construction Programs 41.2 26.4 14.3) 21. 1 Debt Retirement & Interest 3.6 3.5 .1) 2.8 ICR Payments • 1 • 1 • 1 Joint Works Operating 6.8 8.2 1.4 .6.5 District Maintenance, Operating 8.3 & Other Expenditures 1.a .s 6.6 Total Expenditures ..11-?..Q.:.L $125.3 s s. l 100.0% ~~' • • y Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their.trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized ·general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget \.._) columri on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. In conjunction with accounting system revisions to accommodate the Revenue Program required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) as of July 1, 1979, the cost accounting system will be expanded to provide for full allocation of overhead expenditures. Because of the scheduled concurrent change-over to an in-house ·computer system on the same date, it is advisable to begin the accounting procedure revisions as soon as possible to minimize any conversion problems next year. Therefore, the new cost allocation methods are presently being phased into operation. This change of procedure may require adjustments to certain line item budget appropriations for 1978-79, however, it will not increase total districts' costs. At report time certain expenditures are running very close to budget appropriat.ions. However, specific budget transfer recommendations, if necessary, are traditionally con- sidered with the third quarter report. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions ·for fiscal 1978-79 which were accrued in 1977-78 are not reflected in the year- to-date balances. If any Directors have questions concerning the report, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $3.6 million. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits, and presently a substantial amount is with the County Treasurer's commingled investments to take advantage of the currently higher yield which is now between 10% and 10.5%. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. Directors will recall that the staff is attempting to reduce the $8.8 million budgeted Joint Operating expenditures by $823,000 during 1978-79, This goal is set forth in the Targeted Budget column of the summary Joint Operating Budget Review statement. The expenditure reduction procedures are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if the staff experiences some unexpected expen- ditures, any upward adjustments will be reviewed by the Committee. The two major items that have occurred to date that will affect the Joint Operating expenditures are (1) the cost accounting system changes mentioned above that will increase chargebacks to CORF and the individual districts for services performed on their behalf by the Joint Administrative Organization and, thus, decrease net Joint Operating costs and (2) the expense of the July 19th public hearing on the proposed flat rate user charge system which was not a budgeted item. -2- Salaries and Wages -Because of presently authorized but unfilled positions, recent increases authorized by the Boards 1 for Engineering, Laboratory and Operations & Maintenance employee units can be funded from current year payroll savings. Budgeted funds were included in this item for adjustments previously authorized by the Boards for the Administrative/Clerical and Supervi5ory units which are now beginning the second year of three-year MOU 1 s. Employees• Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workers• Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms. Projected increase in Retirement costs have been delayed until next fiscal year. (Comments above on Salaries and Wages also apply to this account.) Chargebacks to Districts and CORF -Payroll expenses charged back to CORF through cost accounting system for work on treatment plants• capital expansion; and to individual Districts for work on Districts• collection facilities capital expansion, and maintenance and repair of said systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective Districts. (See note above under Joint Operating Fund re cost accounting system changes). Gasoline, Oil & Fuel -Useage increasing as additional equipment placed into service. Prices are beginning to escalate again and this item will have to be watched closely. Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter. Budget account includes Board and staff out-of- county travel policy, employee fid~lity, boiler, fire, umbrella liability and anticipated primary liability claims. Effective 7-1-78 the Boards elected to self-insure primary liability claims up to $300,000 per incident. Other costs of self-insurance are included under payroll and benefits, contractual services and professional services accounts. Staff is monitoring the self- insurance program and will keep the Fiscal Policy Committee apprised as soon as sufficient time has elapsed to evaluate the trends. Office Expense -This account has exceeded the appropriation because of the $40,000 postage expense associated with the flat rate public hearing notice. A budget transfer will be necessary. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -·Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Demand for these chemicals increase as weather warms. Chemical Coagulants -Expenditures for this item will increase to maintain compliance with NPDES permit requirements, yet are presently well within the budget allocation. Coagulants are expensed at the time of invoicing and, therefore, first six months' expenditure does not reflect inventory on hand at June 30th or deliveries prior to December 31st yet to be billed. As activated sludge facilities are phased to a fully operational mode the demand for these chemjcals will also increase. · Other Operating Supplies -Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, etc. Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge and grit hauling, EDP services and Workers' Compensation claims administration. Long distance solids hauling was suspended and the sludge was temporarily processed at the ~ treatment plant site due to inclement weather and pending completion of the Coyote Canyon site. Thus, this item is running well under budget. Professional Services -Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. -3- Printing and Publications -Continuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with "paper work" required by other agencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations. Expenditures to date presently include $13,000 in equipment rentals for Plant No. 1 sludge processing site preparation being held in this account pending final accounting and reclassification to a capital account. Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally this a~count runs very tight due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring -Annual ~hare of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research Project has· been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first half of 1978-79. Budget also includes funds for operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters. Trav~l, Meeting & Training -Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Although expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent years, such extensive travel has not been necessary during the first two quarters of this year. Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power which has increased substantially in the past few years· due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utility companies. A portion is from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. The activated sludge facilities recently placed into service at Plant No. 1 will increase this cost dramatically and a budget transfer will probably be necessary. Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere. Prior Year's Expense -Thfs account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. Chargebacks to Districts and CORF -This is a new account established in connection with the cost accounting system revisions discussed previously and repr~sent~ materials, supplies and services overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts• jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 70% (including reserves) of each District's budget requirements for 1978-79. During the first .. six months, $7. 1 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities ~ expansion, most of which was on the 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, up to 87.5% of which will be grant funded. The share of joi~t works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. -4- .. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the ac~ounting transactions for the seven Districts and incJude each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Again, the cost accounting changes being implemented as noted above may require budgetary adjustments to some line item '...__;expenditure accounts before year's end to reflect the added overhead allocations. Taxes -Taxes apportioned to date equal 49% of the expected receipts for the year. Federal and State Construction Grants -$8.0 mill ion in construction grant funds were received during the period. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87.5% of 11 approved 11 treatment facilities projects. However, unless a Revenue Program is adopted by July 1, 1979, and implemented, the U. S. Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) will stop all construction grant payments. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires that the Districts adopt and implement ·.an equitable system of user charges by July 1, 1979. The Act was amended in December, 1977, to allow use of ad valorem taxes to distribute the cost of operation and maintenance to domestic (residential) users. Allocation of costs to industrial and large commercial dischargers is based on actual use. The ad valorem system is the most cost-effective method and provides for a reasonably equitable distribution of costs in compliance with the intent of the Act, as amended. However, Jarvis-Gann and its' implementing legislation may preclude utilization of this method in future years for the residential community. The Boards have previously engaged the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co. (PMM) to complete the User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery Revenue Program. The Executive Committee has directed the staff to instruct the consultant to continue work on development of an equitable program taking into.account the Proposition 13 restrictions and including an examination of all existing annexation, connection and industrial user fee schedules and their relationship to any current or proposed costs to residential and small commercial properties. PMM will present a status report to the Boards on March 14th. Fees -With the exception of Districts 1 and 6, all Districts now have a sewer C'Orlnection fee schedule in effect. This account also includes industrial waste use charges levied by all seven Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and acreage fees for new annexations. Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1978-79 budget (including reserves) for this item is 21% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2, 3 and 11. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditure for the seven Districts during the first quarter was $3.9 million, 74% of which was for the Knott Interceptor in District No. 3. Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal faci1 ities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF). Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obi igation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.2 mill ion. -5-. r .. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts• share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distr.ibuted based upon each District's respective gal lon'Clge flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). Distiict Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual District's general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective District's collection systems. Presently, the following items are running very close to budget and may require an appropriation transfer before year's end: Pump Station Maintenance in Districts 2, 3 and 5; Permit and Industrial Waste Administration in 1, 2, and 3; Utilities in 2, 6 and 7 and Professional Services in District No. 7. JWS:dt J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary· -6- u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .. SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEI'/ 6 MONTHS ENDED DEC. 31, 1978 _SAr.ARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS ~alarics & Wages Employee Bcncfi ts Sub-total Payroll Less: Chgbacks to Dists & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll ~~TERIALS, SUPPLIES G SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel Insurance ~ Office Expense Chlorine fr Odor Control Chem Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contrictual Services Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases -Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Utilities nthcr E>..-pcnses ~·ior Years Expense Sub-total Material & Supp. Less: Chgbacks to Dists· & CORF Net JO Mat., Supp. & Serv. TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Less: Revenue . NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE · APPROVED BUDGET 4' 811, 001 833,482 5,644,483 1,000,000 4,6'14,483 90,000 76,000 47,000 300,000 550,000 147,000 456,000 88, 000 . 50,000 25,000 518,000 247,000 37,000 1,405,000 34' 000 52,000 4,122,000 -0:- 4,122,000. 8,766,483 614,000 8,152,483 • TARGETED BUDGET 1978 -79 4,552,000 811,712 5,363,712 1,000,000 4,363,712 70,000 76,000 45,000 250,000 400,000 127,000 450,000 78,000 50,000 25,000 518,000 177, 000 25,000 1,205,000 33,000 50,000 3,579,000 -0- . 3,579,000 J ••• 7', 942, 712 614,000 7,328,712 GALLONAGE INFORMATION YEAR TO DATE EXPENDITURES 1,860,214 250,698 2,110,912 830,688 1,280,224 32,870 66,206 48,629 116, 142 76,066 34,327 145,983 33,975 14,784 27,468 208,911 81,320 3,933 534,221 5,073 37,738 1,467,646 43,610 1,424,036 2,704,260 220,708 2,483,552 FLOW IN MILLION GAL GALLONAGE CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE I 7,849 4,197 830,023 296,012 2 22,317 10,392 2,359,997 733,030 3 21,991 11, 323 2,325,523 798,668 5 3,929 1,994 415,487 140,664 6 4,180 2,347 442,030 165,515 7 4,470 .2' 247 472, 697 158,487 11 4,567 2, 710 482,955 191,176 TOTAL 69,303 35,210 J_,_3 ~8' 71_? __ 2,483,552 --- UNEXPENDED TAIH~l~TED BUDGET 2,691,786 561, 014 3,252,800 169,312 3,083,488 37,130 9,794 (3,629) 133,858 323,934 9'2' 673 304,017 44.,025 35,216 (2,468) 309,089 .· 95' 680 21,067 670,779 27, 927 .. • 12,262 2, lll ,354 (43,610) 2,154,964 5,238,452 393,292 4,845,160 VVVtt I I Vflltl. 11•1 IVI\ l.l&Vll\l.\"I llVl.L .. .. SUMM/\HY OU/\RTERLY F IiJf\;1JC I.~L REPORT 6 !1onths Ended Dec. 31, 1978 · BlH>CET HEV I El'/ .. . Hudr.ct Beginning Fund D~lances, July 1 REVENUES: 71·nx Levy" (Bond Fund (s) only) Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) Federal and StatQ Construction Grnnts ·Fees 82,862 689,652 1,249,000 220,000 588,000 Interest & Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXP12NOITURES: District 1~unk Sewer Constr & Reserves Joint 'freatrnent Plant Constr & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest J:xpcnse Share of Joint \\'orks Operating Ex1Jcnses District Operating & Other Expenditures 72' 393 : 6,985,298 Total E:>q>enditurcs ~g Fund Balances, De~ember 31 CO~STRUCTION ·IN PROGRESS: Share of Joint ~1orks COMPLETED PROPEiffY, PLANT 4 EQUIP: Lnnd and Property· Rlghts Collection Li ncs ancl l'uinp Stns. 1·rc.~~1 tm~n t Fae il it. i cs · spo$al Fad 1 i t.i c~ ~hcra 1 l'l ant ~ind J\c.lm in F:1ci l Equity in Jnjnt TrC'atm<.'nt F~1cil Otlwr ns~;ct:s at co:;t lc:;s nmort. i ~~at j on Total Property Pl:mt li Equip 89,163 923,676 91,900 FACILITIES EXPA1\SlON Balance 6-30-78 1~173,921 21,657 5,594,966 11, 593 13,709 8,843,598 2,643 15,662,087 Additions 637,507 637,507 Year To Date 6,441,496 47,263" 350,882 720,548 111,.473 239,763 7,911,425 637,507 79,319 296,012 31,906 1,044,744 6,866,681· Transfer To Fixed Assets Rcmairdng . Budget 35,599 338, 770 528,452 108,527 348,237 72,393 6,347,791. ·g' 844 627,664 59,994 Balance 12-31-78 1,811,428 21,657 5,594,966 11,593 13,709 8,843,598 2,643 --- 16,299,594 .,.. _________ __...... ---------------. cuur~ I y ~/\NJ I/\ I I ON J) I STIU CT NO. 2 . . . . ·~ SUMM/\RY QU/\lrIIRLY EI N/\NC I .~L REPOl~T .. 6 t~nths Ended Dec. 31, 1978 ·--~~11G1r1· lll~T~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Dcginni ng Fund B:1lanccs, July 1 REVENUES: ·• Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) ·Tax All oc.ations/Subventions (Shnre of J!I~) Fcdernl nn<l Stntc Construction Grnnts ~Fees • Interest & Other Revenues Totetl Rcv9nuc tt Beginning Balances EXPE 0 NDJTURES: Distr·i ct Trunk Sewer Cons tr & Reserves Joint Treatment Plant Constr fl Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses District Operating & .O~hcr Expenditures rrotal EA1lendi tures .. E~ng Fund Balances, . December 31 434 I 046 2,919,167 . 4I11'1>000 ·1,636,000 2,135,000 . . 9,984,901 23,410, 149 510,444 2,625,100 1,570,500 FACILITIES EXPANSION CO~STRUCTION ·I·N PROGRESS: Balance 6-30~ 78 Anaheim Forebay Reclamati.on Plant Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan & EIR Richfield & Orchard Stibtrunks "36, 1~4 . 45,998 .6.3,462 .. ·· Orange Subtrunk · · ·Olive Subtru.nk Yorba ·Linda F/M ,. r Share of Joint Works cmtPJ.ETl.:n P13_~'E!Q~.!_ .. ]~_!,.r\NT ti _!~~IP: Land nnd J> rOJH.' rt.y IH eh ts Collection L:ines and Pump Stns. •1·vcnt.mcnt Fac.il i t·i cs "--'~:. p ()$:a 1 F: I c i 1 i t ·i c ~ GC'n<'1·al Pl ant nnd J\duti n F:1d l Hqui t)' in .lo int Tr<.' a t11h.~nl. Fad 1 Other a!•~l~ts nt CO!>t less \\mo1·ti~~1t iot\ 'J'ol.nl l'ruperty Plant ti Equip .3.22, 896. 468",470 3,851,082 4,319,552 420,384 41,257,358 . 1, 187 33' 172 33,581 29,413, 182 ··--~J.£ .. 75,487,403 Aclditio11s 2,496 387,160 .... 409 7,562 51,608 449,235 2,l~0,313 2,569,548 2,569,548 Year To D:ltc 28,786,768 230,875 1,440,224 2,396,501 1,003,200 1,385,405 35,242,973 : 4~49' 235 2,120,313" 102,553 733,030 154,903 3,560,034 _31, 682' 939 Transfer To Fixed Assets Rcmnjninr: . J\ud1~ct ------- 203,171 1,478,943 1, 717 ,499 632,800 749,595 9,535,666 21,289,833 . 407' 89i 1,892,070 1,415,597 Balance 12-31-78 36' 114 .48,494 . 450,622 323~305 • 7 ,_562 51,608 917,705 5,971,395 6,889,100 420,384 41,257,358 1,187 33,172 35,581 29,413,182 -~~£_ 78, os·6, 951 -------·--·-... -------··--· ... --.......... ·-------· __ ..., ·-·-····· ·-- ,. COUNTY SANIT~!ION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTEHLY F HJ/\NC I.~L REPorrr 6 ~funths Ended Dec. 31, 197S BUDGET JWV I EN Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) Tax Allocations/Suhventions (Share of 1%) Federal and Stntc Construction Grants Fees Interest & Other Revenues Budget 645' 7·43 4,069,931 4,546,000 1,370,000 2,353,079 Year To Date 27,339,022 334,870 1,951,219 2,631;010 668,970 1,064,952 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 33,990,043 EXPENDITURES: District Trunk "Sewer Constr & ·Reserves Joint Treatment Plant Constr & Reserves Bond Retirel:lent nnd Interest Expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses District Operating & .Other Expenditures 7,417,288 25,738,621 716,058 2,586,783 512,000 Total Expenditures ~ Ending Fund Balances, De~ember 31 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Knott Interceptor, Reach 7· Knott Interceptor, Reach 8. ~\festminster Ave. F /M · ··Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Westside Relief Interceptor Share of Joint Works COMPLETEO PROPERTY,. PLANT fr EQUIP: -LnnJ.7tiUfl>rope1:-ty Rights Collection Lines nnd Pump Stns. 'l'r<.?:ttmcnt Facil i.ti cs "--"'isposa 1 Facil :i. U cs Gcncrnl Plant and /\clmin Fad.l l!quity j n Joint Treatment Faci 1 Other :t$~Cts at co!;t lc5s mnorti. ~~1 t ion 'J'otnl Pi·opcrt:y PJant l~ Equip FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance 6-30-78 1,044,i79 5~;0l8 574,194 1,677,391 4,270,801 5,948,192 280,231 41,398,554 15,036 28 ,419 . 52,006 32, 2p, 227 9,775 79,949,440 Additions 2,809,895 1,324 56,802 44·;550·· .. 3,189 2' 915 , 1.6 0 . 2,322,449 5,238,209 5,238,209 ------ 2,915,760 2,322,449 125,397 798,668 .~29,075 27,698,694 . Transfer To Fixed Assets Remaining· Buel get 310,873 2,118,712 1,914,990 701,030 1,288,127 4,501,528 23,416,172 590' 66.1 1,788,115 382,925 Balance 12-31-78 3~854,074 1,324 115,820 618,744 3,189 4,593,151 6,593,250 11~-186,401 280,231 41,398,554 15,036 28,419 52,006 32,217,227 9, 775 85,187,649 .. _____ _ ---------__..........--•-4 ·' COUNTY S/\N rr ~:r I ON DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMAr~Y QUf\RTERL Y FI N/\NC I l\L REPORT ·6 ~funths Ended Dec. 31, 1978 IHJllGET REVIEW Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES:· Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) Tax All ocations/Subvcntions (Share of 1 ~o) Federal and State Construction Grants Fees . 25, 715 702,568 940,000 75,000 919,500 Interest & Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPEND I TURES : . . District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves Joint Treatment Plant Constr & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses District Operating & O~her Expenditures 2,283,711 5,424,452 27,315 462,246 286,450 Total Expenditures m'ing Fund Balances, D~cember 31 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications· Back Bay Trunk NIWA Planning Jamboree Pump ·stn/Big Canyon.Drain Re~ine Coast Hwy Trunk Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT f, EQUIP: Land and Property IU ghts CollccUon Lines and Pump Stns. Tr<.~atmcnt Fad.litics ~isposal Facil .i.ti cs General Plnnt :ind /\dmin Fncil Equity :in Joint Trea tmcnt F~1cil Other nsscts at cost less mnortizution Balance 6-30-78 19,401 254,253 12,565 3, 395 .. 23,405 313,019 883,347 1,196,366 6,231 3, 117, 223 7,347 7' 115. 8, 946 6,794,431 2,099 Additions 10",490 159,149 169,,639 489,792 659,431 Year To Date 6,415,863 13, 988 342,744 553,592 51,695 .257,686 7,365,568 169,639 489,792 23,566 140,664 109,402 933,06,3 6,432,505 Transfer To Fixed Assets Remaining· ~dgct 11, 727 359,824 386,408 23,305 661,814 2,114,072 4,934,660 3, 7.49 321,582 177, 048 Balance 12-31-78 . . 19,401 254,253 12,565 ·13 J 885 182,554 . 482, 658 1,373,139 1,855,797 6,231 3,117,223 7,347 7, 115 8,946 6,794,431 2,099 -------. ---~--· 'J'otal Property Plant t~ Equip 11,139,758 659,431 11,799,189 COUNTY S/\NIT/\TION DISTIHCT NO. 6 . .. ·' SUMM/\RY QUf\RTERLY FI Nf\NC l,l\L REPORT 6 tfunths.Endcd Dec. 31, 197S BUDGET REVIEW Budget Beginning Fund Dalanccs, July 1 REVENUES: . Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) Tax Alloc.ations/Subventions (Share of 1%) Federal and State Construction Grants ·Fees 30,756 409,399 802,000 45,000 297,574 Interest & Other Revenues Total .Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Trunk Sewer Cohstr & Reserves Joint Treatment Plant Constr & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses District Op~rating & Other Expenditures 133,503 3,823,227 33, 110 . 491,595 73,900 Total EA'])enditures ~ Ending Fund Balances, December 31 CONSTRUCTION ·IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications' New Metering Structure · Reline Coast Hwy Trunk Share of Joint Works COMPI.fffEn PHOPERTY, Pl.ANT & EQUIP: Land auc.1 Property IUnh ts Collection Lines and Pump Stns. Treatment Facilities "--'iispo5:tl Faci 1 iti cs General Plant mHl Admin F:1ci 1 Eqni ty in .Joint Tr"~:i tment: Fncil Other a!-'sct:s at co~;t less mnorti wti on FACILITrns cXPANSJON Balance 6-30-78 502 861 14,325 15,688 754,203 769,891 562 625,628 2,653 7,394 16,237 5,715,959 _5,240 Additions 53,050 53' 050 412,047 465,097 Total Property P"lant li Equip 7,143,564 465,097 Year To Date 3,550,692 19,413 199,917 465,720 27 ,371 137,998 4, 401, Ill 53,050 412, 047 . 28,919 165,515 12,325 671,856 3,729,255 Transfer To Fixed Assets Rcmnining Dud net 11,343 209,482 336,280 17,629 159,576 80,453 3,411,18q 4,191 326,080 61,575 Balance 12-31-78 502 861 67,~75 68,738 1,166,250 1,234,988 562 625,628 2,653 7,394 16-, 237 5,715,959 5,240 7,608,661 > COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ··. -. SUMMARY QUARTERLY FI NANCI .~L REPORT 6 Months Ended Dec. 31, 1978 BUDtiET 1{.~EV~I:'"';'E':";"'.':w~------------------- Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) 1'ax Allocations/Subventions (Shnrc of 1%) Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Interest & Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves Joint Treatment Plant Constr & Reserves Bm1d Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures. ~ing Fund Balances, December 31 Budget . 645,520 849,182 1,161,000 415,000 1,122,981 2,424,456 6,699,035 669,385 525,835 365,550 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Tustin-Orange Trunks Mac Arthur Pump Station Other Share of Joint Works CO~tPLl:TEO PROPEJrrY, PLANT f. EQUIP: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines nn<l Pump Stns. Treatment Facilities ~isposal Fad 1 :i.ties Gcncr:11 Pl ant mHl Admj n F:1ci 1 E<1u:i ty in .Jo:i nt Tre:1tment racl 1 Other nsr.ct.s at cost less mnortj zation 'l'ot:il Prop0rty Plant li Equip Balance 6-30-78 3,516 3,329 2,395 9,240 1,091,269 1,100,509 275,740 18, 019,491 10,782 12,440 8,392,554 2,758 -- 27,814,274 Additions 4,966 4,966 604,996 609,962 609,962 ·------·-___ .... ____ ··-· Year 1'o Date 9,854,114 344,560 436,573 683,802 207,381 426, 111 11,952,541 4,966 604,996 386,387 158,487 110,929 1,265,765 10,686,776 Transfer To Fixed Assets Remaining· Budget 300,960 412,609 477 ,198 207,619 698,870 2,419,490 6,094,139 282, 99.8 367,348 254,621 Balance 12-31-78 3,516 8,295 2,395 14,206 ~,696,265 1, 710,471 275,740 18,019,491 10,782 12, 440 8,392,554 2,758 28,424,236 -------·-....-.-·--- > COUNTY S/\N I Tl\ TI ON DISTRICT NO. 11 . .. . SUMMARY QUArrf El~LY FI N/\NC I.~L REPORT 6 Months Ended Dec. 31, .1978 --------~------~------------------~~ num;1n-IWVJ E\'I Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES :· Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) Tax AllocatioHs/Subventions (Share of 1%) Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Interest & Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Trunk Sewer Constr G Reserves Joint Treatment Plant Constr & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures )!mfing Fund Balances, December 31 Budr,ct 81,123 784,382 947,000 400,000 639,700 3,736,499 5,362,967 88,050 537,248 269,400 FACILITIES EXPANSlON CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Master Plan Coast Hwy Trunk . Slater Ave. Pump Station Warner Ave. Relief (Purchased from Huntington Bch.) Share of Joint Works cmtPLETED PROPERTY, PJ .ANT r, EQUIP: Land and Property 1{ights Collcctfon Lines :md Pump Stns. Trcntmcnt racili tics lisposn 1 Facil it:i e~ ~cncrnl Plnnt nntl /\durin Fad.I Hqui t)' in .Joint Treatment Faci 1 Oth~r assets at cost less nmo1·ti.zntio11 'J'otal Property Pl:mt li E<[ni.p Balance 6-30-78 21,816 8,686 I, 227 · . 31, 729 889,804 921,533 18, 711 3,872,692 3,053 24,436 6,667,018 l, 981_ 11, 509, 424 ----- Additions 100 1, 2.37 289,070 290,,407 480,604 771, 011 771, 011 Ycnr To Date 8,001,105 41,801 375,210 543,207 1,881 306,445 9,269,649 290,407 480,604 24,975 •191,174 50,298 1,037,A.58 8,232,191 Trans'f er To Fixed Assets Rcm:1i ning· Buel get 39,322 409, 172 403, 793 398' 119 333,255 3,446,092 4,882,363 63,075 346,074 219,102 Balance 12-31-78 21,916 9,923 1,227 289,070 322,136 1, 370 ,408 1,692,544 18,711 3,872,692 3,053 24,436 6,667,018 1,981 12,280,435 -------- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Alan G. S. West, President Michael 0. Cohen. C.P.A. Don McBride Reverend Roswell C. McFadden A. William Mochon, C.P.A. P. Douglas Tripp Carol D. Weddle BREAL, .Inc. 401 S. BREA BLVD. BREA, CA. 92621 February 16, 1979 Sanitation District #2 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 Re: Waiver of Fees Honorable Board of Directors: Thank you for your consideration in the Breal matter. . ,· .... .,, I came to you, knowi~g that I was probably going to create some waves -I did. I understand your reticents to open Pandora's Box. I will be in touch with Fred Harper and arrange payment of the fees. The project will proceed and be successful. Thank you, again, gentlemen. ,,_: -·· • President AGSW:gb COUN TY Sf\N IT I\ Tl Oil J) I srn I CT S OF ORf\NGE CO UNl y Es TJ MATC OF Pon1n 1/\L Co NsoLJ D/\T JON SAV I NGS AND Cos T 'T.;TIHllTfD 0 '1 (-T I ME llLJ DG fT iiRY SA\llllGS Bu dqc t 1 t <'m Share of J o int Op e ra ting Trunk Ma i nt e nan c e Ma nh o le & Li nc Rcp;tl r s Pu mp St a t ion t:a int e nilnce . P e rm i t ~ I W Adm ini s trat io n lntc r -Di s tri rt S C'1·1c ~ Us e Ch a q )e Bond Co l l ec ti on Expe nse Tax Co l l ect i on Expen s e Tr e a s u r e r's Ba ~k l n g a nd I nve s t me n t F t>c Ut i 1 it i cs Pr ofess i on a l Se rv i ces Print i ng & Pub li ca ti ons 111.ie r s h i ps Un co l l ec ti b l e Acc ounts Connec t ion Fee Adm in i s t r a t i o n I nte r es t Expen s e s App li c ab l e l o P ri o r Yea rs ToLa l Ope r n ti ng & No n-Ope r a ting Se l f In su r an ce Re s e r ve Unapp r opr i a t e d Res e r ve Au t hor i zed Gen e r a l Rc~cr v e GRAl\D TOT/\L EST I t\AH D /.l ltl LJ/\l. CO Sl SA VI I/GS Di rec t o r s Fees & T r a vr l 7 8-79 ll udqc t s 8, 152 ,4 83 32 0 ,000 270 ,000 2 7 8 ,0 00 305,000 4 ,500 2 , 10 0 24,900 60 ,80 0 2 63,500 57 ,000 9 ,9 0 0 8 , 100 2 6 ,700 15 0 ,300 19 ,00 0 20 ,500 s 9 ,972 ,783 5 00 ,0 00 1,0 95 ,000 11, 083,ooo $1 6 ,11 55.7 8 3 77-78 Est 'd Co ns o l l - d .1 t e d Outl q,• t 230,000 270 ,00 0 235 ,00 0 285 ,00 0 -o - 1,600 55 ,000 21i5 ,oo o 45,000 5 ,000 8 , 100 15,000 150 ,300 6,oo o 15,000 $ 9 ,7li J ,383 50 0 ,00 0 1,09 5 ,000 4 ,758,000 S l G,09(,,383 AG ENDA IT EM NO . 15 Es t 'd O ud~e t a ry Sa v ings Fro m Cons o l idat i on -o- s 9 0,00 0 -o- li3 ,000 20 ,00 0 -o- 5 00 -o- 5,80 0 18 ,500 12 ,000 -o- 11,700 -o- -o- 5 ,500 *No hudge t l ng bccn use o f offs e tti ng r evc nuc it em . *No s av i ngs -$18 ,000 o f i nt e 1 es t budge t i s inte r-d i st ri c t . $ 21l'900 !~ -o- -o- 130 ,000 u111 ,90 0 '· $ 15,000 St u ff i ng and Annu<i l /\ud i t 3 5 ,00 0 ESTI MAT[(l CO ST OF COIJSO LI O/\T I Oll fl oilrd'>' and Co nr.1i tt c·c Me e tin gs Gcne r .1 1 Co11 11 r.c l Ti 1·1c St .,f f Ti me f'ri nt 1119 .:1 11 cl 11i 5cc l l .:in co u s *l t~m d u ~~ no t ~ros~-foo t s 50 ,0 00 $ 8 ,500 6 ,500 6 ,000 -::-::--l,500 LJ),50q_ Di st. /!I l. Tr eatment Plant Expansion (a) 10,442,000 2. Less Grant Funding (5, 135,000) 3. Net Tre atment Plant Local Fun ding Required (6-ye ars 78/79-5,307,000 83/84) 4. Outs t andi ng Bonds (Principa l ) 840,000 5. Sc hedu le B-1 Maste r Plan Fae i I it i es (5-years 78/79 -~2/8 3) 422 ,000 6. Less Grant Funding 7. To t a l Funding Requiremen ts 6,569,000 8 . Ca s h on Hand (7 ,226,042 ) 9. Funds (Avai I able) or Required (657,042) 10. Schedu l e B-2 Maste r Plan Fa cilit i es (Afte r 82 /8 3) 11. Funds (Availab l e ) or Requi r ed (6 57 ,042) 12. Schedu le B-3 Fac ilities 13. Fund s (Ava ilab le) or Required (657,042) 14. Bond Int e r e st (c) 10 3 ,688 (553,354) ., COUNTY SANITATION DI STR J , J I, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 and 11 SUMMARY OF FUNDS AVA IL AB LE AND ADD I TI ON AL FUNDING REQUIR ED CONSOL I DATION Dist. #2 Dist. #3 34,728,ooo 38,039 ,000 (17,078,000) (18,707 ,000) 17,650,000 19,332,000 3,945 ,000 5,954,ooo 4. 109,908 7,840 ,4 00 25,704,908 33,126,400 (35 , 192,435) (34 ,333,238) (9,487,527) ( 1,206,838) 2,275,000 (9,487,527) 1,068,162 1,138,000 (9,4 87,527) 2,206 ,162 468,469 754,444 (9,0 19,058) 2,960,606 BUDGET REVIEW Di st. #5 8,022,000 (3. 945 '000) 4,077,000 276,000 2 ,814,639 7,167,689 (7 ,659 .998) (492 ,3 09) (492,309) (492,309) 44 ,2 48 (44 8,06 1) Di st. #6 6,749,000 (3,319,000) 3,430,000 262 ,000 232 ,000 3,924,000 (4,018 ,692) (94,692) 175,000 80 ,30 8 l,000 ,000 1,080 ,308 35,734 l, 116,042 Re v is ion 1 1/24/79 Revis Ion 2 1/26/79 Di st . 117 9,909,000 (4,873,000) 5,036,000 6, 110,200-(b) 463,831 11,610,031 (12,259,020) (648,989) 1,297 ,847 648,858 450,000 1 ,098,858 1 ,849,850 2,948,7 08 Dist. 1/11 7,8 71,000 (3 ,871 ,000) 4,000,000 848,ooo 7,5 30 ,00 0 (3 ,4 80 ,000 ) 8,898,000 (9,247,7 17) (349,717) 934,000 584,283 5,044,000 5 ,628,283 148,800 5, 777 ,083 (a) Assumes wa i ve r of secondary trea t me nt (b) In c lud es JOS Liabi 1 i t y (c) It is anticipated that bond inte r est payments can be made from investmen t inte rest earnings on the bond pr incipa l . TOTAL 115,760,000 (56,928,000) 58,832,000 18,235,200 23,412,828 (3,480 ,00 0) 97,000 ,028 (109 ,937.142) (12,937,1 14) 4,68 1,847 (8,25),267) 7,632,000 (623 ,267) 3,405,233 2,781 ,966 ti TREATMENT PLANT-(!) Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/84 Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropri at Ion for Hon-Grant Funded Fa cl 11 ti es TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION HASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUHD ITEHS-(2) Appropriation for District Facilities TOTAL MASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT 1951 ISSUE: Outstanding Bonds @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED INDEBTEDNESS GRAND TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY CON_SOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW (1) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED 10,442,000 10,442,000 422 ,ODO -(3) 422,000 840,000 103,688 943,688 11,807 ,688 A (2) 1978-79 BUDGET PPROPRI ATI ON (2,820,627) (2,332,216)} (1,832.455) (6,985,298) (72,393) (72,393) (70,000) (19, 163) (79, 188) (168,351) (7,226,042) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (APPROPRIATED) 7,621,373 (4, 164,671) 3,456,702 349,607 349,607 770,000 84,525 (79,188) 775,337 4,581,646 (4) ES Tl HATED CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (5, 135,000) (5, 135,000) (5, 135,000) (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 MGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver) (5) ALLOCATION OF APPROPRIATIONS ANO RESERVES (2 ,486,373) 3,526,792 1,040,419 (349,607) (349,607) (770,000) 79, 188 (690,812) Revision I 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) UNAPPROPRIATED BAL AVAILABLE) OR ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED (4) (637,879) (637 ,879) 84,525 84,525 ( 553,354) Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years if consolidations occurs. (2) The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons s~t forth. (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$9,000: This item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capita I funds "operating cos ts -$6, I 00: Expenses a re nom i na I and funded from annua 1 revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$542,556: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (3) Hlscel laneous Projects (4) If full secondary treatment requirement is not waived, an additional $1,714,000 In local funds will be required. ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION t:UDGET REVIEW Rev Is Ion l l /211/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) ( l) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED (2) (3) (4) (5) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL 1978-79 BALANCE TO EST I HATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR BUDGET BE PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION or APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING TREATMENT PLANT·(l) Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/84 Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Treatment Plant Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS-(2) Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon Liability to Anaheim for So. S/A River Trunk Orange Sub-Trunk River Crossing Distribution of Joint Works SAWPA Equity Orchard and Richfield Interceptor Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon Project Olive Sub-Trunk River Crossing South Santa Ana River Interceptor Appropriation for District Facilities and Improvements SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL HASTER PLAN '..I BONDED DEBT 1951 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve 1958 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED INDEBTEDNESS GRAND TOTAL 34.728,000 34,728,000 5,000 91,908 30,000 1,138,000 820,000 2,084,908 I , 000, 000-{It) 300,000 125,000 600,000-(3) 2,025,000 4, 109,908 495,000 54,844 549,844 3,450,000 413,625 3,863,625 4,413,469 43,251 ,377 APPROPRIATION OR (APPROPRIATED) GRANTS (9,253, 146) 25,474,854 (17,078,000) (7,768,00D) J (13,957,000) (6, 189,000) (23,210, 146) 11,517,854 (17 ,078;000) (5,000) (46,000) lt5,go0 (30,000) (l, 138,000) (820,000) (2,341,500) (2,341,500) (4,380,500) (2,295,592) -o-1,000,000 -o- (300,000) ( 125 ,000) (6,363,401) cs. 763,401) (6,788,401) I (4,763,liOI) ( II , 168 , 90 l ) I (7,058,993) (45,000) 450,000 (11, 194) li3,650 (50,344) (50,344) (106,538) 443,306 (350,000) 3, 100,000 (IO'i,250) 309,375 (252,600) (252,600) (706,850) 3,156,775 (813 ,388) 3,600,081 (35. 192 ,435) 8,058,942 (17,078,000) (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 MGO secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). AND RESERVES REQUIRED (8,396,854) 8,396,854 (5,560, 146) -o-(5,560, 146) (45,908) 2,341,500 2,295,592 (l ,000,000) 1,951,464 ( 3 ,811 ,937) 951,464 (3,811,937) 3,2li7,056 (3,811,937) (450,000) 43,650 50,3li4 (399,656) li3,650 (3, 100,000) 309,375 252,600 (Z.,8lt7,400) 309,375 (3 ,247. 056) 353,025 -o-(9,019,058) Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted, This Item Is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth. (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$30,000: This item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -S82,IOO: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$1,689,609: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (d) Sleepy Hot low-Carbon Canyon Project -$200,000: Project has been cancel led. (3) Hlscellaneous Projects. (4) Revised cost estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment Is not waived, an additional $5,700,000 In local funds wlll be required, (5) TREATHENT PLANT -(I) Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/84 Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facllltles TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEMS -(2) Knott Interceptor -Portion of Reach 7 Reimburse other CSD's for Seal Beach Blvd. Pump Station Equity Orangethorpe Relief Trunk, Reach 15 Westminster Avenue Force Hain Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Additional Pumps at Seal Beach P.S. Knott Interceptor -Reach 8 Katella Relief Interceptor ~gethorpe Relief Trunk -Reaches 16 & 16A \ fent Relief Trunk, Reach 14 ~olia Interceptor, Reach 30 Lampson Interceptor, Reaches 11 & 12 Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL MASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT -1951 & 1958 Issues: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW (I) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED 38,039,000 38,039,000 3,400,000 85,400 80,000 1,600,000 -o- 5, 165,400 275,000-(4) 2,000,000 200,000 2,275,000 258,000 270,000 410,000 400,000-(3) 6,088,000 11,253.400 5,954,000 754 ,444 6,708,444 56,000,844 (2) 1978-79 BUDGET APPROPRIATION (10,261,621) (8,614,000)} (6,863,000) (25,738,621) (3 ,400,000) (85,400) (80,000) (1,600,000) (67 ,823) (5 ,233 ,223) (2,000,000) (184,065) (2, 184,065) (7,417,288) (535,000) (181,058) (461,271) (1, 177 ,329) (34. 333. 238) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (ArPROPRIATED) 27,777.379 (15,477 ,000) 12,300,379 (67,82.3) (67 ,823) 275,000 200,000 2,275,000 258,000 270,000 410,000 215,935 3,903,935 3,836,112 5,419,000 573.386 (461,271) 5,531, 115 21,667,606 (4) ESTIMATED co:~STRUCT I ON GRANTS (18, 707 ,000) (18,707,000) ( 18. 707 ,000) (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Revision 1 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (5) ALLOCATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES (9,070,379) 15,477 ,000 6,406,621 67,823 67,823 (275,000) (1,025,780) (215,935) Cl ,516,715) (J ,448,892) (5,419,000) 461,271 (4,957,729) (6) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL AVAILABLE) OR ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED (5) 200,000 1,249.220 258,000 270,000 410,000 2,387,220 2,387,220 573,386 573,386 2,960,606 Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This Item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be dlsc.ontinued In future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The foll0\'1lng 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$33,000: This item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$84,400: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$1,477,461: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (3) Miscellaneous Projects. (4) Revised Cost Estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment ls not waived, an additional $6,243,000 In local funds will be required. TREATMENT PLANT-(1) Plant Expansion Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION HASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS-(2) Replace Pumps at "A" St., 14th St., & Lido P.S. Lining of Coast Hwy. Force Hain Appropriation for District Improvements Master Plan Update & NIWA Project SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Replace Portion of Bayside Drive Sewer Jamboree Drive Relief System New Santa Ana River Crossing Bay Bridge P.S. Additions Lining of Coast Hwy. F/H lace Pumps at Rocky Point \. jbursernent Agreements Payable .....,,..oprlation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL HASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT: 1951 Issue Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW (1) TOTAL FUNDS ~ 8,022,000 8,022,000 7,000 150,000 -o- 33, 000 190,000 250,000-(4) 1,000,000-(4) 220,000-(4) 350,000-(4) 257,000-(4) 13,000 159,689 375,000-(3) 2,624,689 2,814,689 276,000 44,248 320,248 11,156,937 () 2 1978-79 BUDGET APPROPRIATION (2,122,452) ( l, 782 ,000) (1,420,000) (5,324,452) (7,000) (150,000) (882 ,852) (33 ,000) (1,072,852) (50,000) (500,000) (13,000) (16,667) (632, 192) (1,211 ,859) (2,284. 711) (20,000) (7,315) (23,520) (50,835) (7 ,659,998) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (APPROPRIATED) 5,899,548 (3,202,000) 2,697,548 (882,852) (882,852) 200,000 500,000 220,000 350,000 257,000 143,022 (257, 192) 1,412,830 529,978 256,000 36,933 (23,520) 269,413 3,496,939 (4) EST I HATED CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (3,945,000) (3 ,945 ,000) (3,945,000) (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Revision I 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) (5) UNAPPROPRIATED BAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR or APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING AND RESERVES REQUIRED (1,954,548) 2,717,006 (484,994) 762,458 (484,994) 882,852 882,852 (200,000) (500,000) (220,000) • (350,000) (257 ,000) (11+3,022) 257. 192 (1,412,830) (529,978) (256,000) 36,933 23,520 (232,1+80) 36,933 (448,061) Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$7,000: This item Is funded annually from Industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$9,400: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -S330,738: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (d) Transfer ACO to FR $50,000: Inter-fund transfer cancels out. (3) Miscellaneous Projects. (4) Revised Cost Estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment requirement Is not waived, an additional $1,317,000 in local funds \'1111 be required. TREATMENT PLANT-(1) Plant Expapsion 1978/79 -1983/84 Appropriation for Trrnt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSIOtl MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEMS-(Z)(ACO FUND) New Santa Ana River Crossing Lining of Coast Hwy F/M Gisler Trunk Relief Sewer Replace Pumps at Rocky Point Appropri at Ion for District Improvements TOTAL MASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT -1951 Issue · Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 erest ~1orized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL COUNTY SANITATI~~ DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW (1) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED A 6,749,000 80,000-(li) 143 ,ooo-(Ii) 1,000,000 9,000 175 ,000-(3) 1,li07,000 262,000 35,734 297 ,73lt 8,453,734 (2) 1978-79 BUDGET :>PROP RI ATI ON (1,812, 152) (1, 126,442) (884,663) (3 ,823 ,227) (50,000) (9,000) (74,503) (133,503) (25,000) (8, 110) (28,852) (61,962) (li,018,692) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (APPROPRIATED) lt,936,848 (2,011,075) 2,925,773 80,000 93,000 1,000,000 100,497 1 ,273 • .497 237,000 27,624 (28,852) 235,772 li,lt35,0lt2 (Ii) ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (3,319,000) (3,319,000) (3,319,000) (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow a_djusted to delete 100 MGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Revision I 1/24179 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) ALLJllnoN (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL AVAILABLE) OR OF APPROPRIATIONS ADO IT I ONAL FUND I NG AND RESERVES REQUIRED (1,617 ,848) (5) 2,011,075 393,227 \80,000\ 93,000 I ,000,000 (12,079) 88,418 (185,079) 1,088,418 . (237 ,000) 27,62lt 28,852 (208, 148) 27,62lt I, 116,0li2 Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years if consolidation occurs. (2) The fol lowing 1978-79 capital budget Items have been omitted frO'll the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$6,000: This Item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$3,800: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$299,801: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (3) Miscellaneous Projects. (Ii) Revised Cost Estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment requirement Is not waived, an additional $1,108,000 in local funds will be required. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 or ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLI DAT I ON BUDGH Rt:V I EW Rl•vlslon I 1/24/79 Rl'V I ~ion 2 1 /26/79 6 ( ) ( l) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED (2) (3) (Ii) (5) (UNAPPROrRIATED BAL 1978-79 MLANCE TO ES Tl HATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR SUOGET BE PROVIOED CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING ~ENT PLANT-(1) Plant Exp.:mslon Appropri.itlon for Trmt. Faci Ii t les to Comply with State & Fl?dl?ral Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXrANSION HASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS-(2) Unappropriated Reserve SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND Tustin-Orange 17, 18 & Hewes/Chapman Tustin-Orange 17, 18 Tustin-Orange, 19, 20 Hichelson Sub-Trunk South Irvine Lift Station South Irvine Sub-Trunk Replace Pumps at Navy Way Station Appropriation for District Improvements Unappropriated Reserve SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL HASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT 1951 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 ~rest ~rlzed General Reserve 1962 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve 1970 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BOHDED DEBT LIABILITY FOR JDS TOTAL JOS GRAllD TOTAL 9,909,000 9,909,000 253,831-(lt) 302,847-(4) 365,000-(4) 200,000-(4) 250,000-(lt) 200,000-(4) 10,000 630,000-(3) 2,211,678 2,211,678 150,000 18,280 168,280 2,li40,000 624,370 3,064,370 3,500,000 1,207,200 4,707,200 7,939,850 20,200 20,200 20,080,728 APPROrRIATION (2,622,035) (2 ,201 ,000) J (l,751t,OOO) (6,577,03.S) (2,031,914) (2,031 ,914) (408,456) I (lio8,456) ! (253,831) I (150,000) i I ( 10,000) ! (920,000) i (779.549) ; (2' 113 ,380) I (4,553,750) i (13 ,000) (3,693) (14,765) (31 ,458) (130,000) (86,440) (77, 134) (293,574) (225,000) (211,252) (352,251) . (788,503) (1,113,535) I I (14,700) ! I ' (14,700) I (12,259,020) i I OR (APPROPRIATED) GRANTS ANO RESERVES REQUIRED 7,286,965 (Ii ,873 ,000) (2,413,965) (3,955,000) 3,955,000 3 .331 ,965 (li,873,000) 1,541,035 (2,031,9lli) 2,031,914 (2 ,031 ,91 It) 2,031 ,914 (408,li56) 408,456 (408,456) 408,456 302,847 302,847-(6) 365,000 365,000-(6) 50,000 (50,000) 250,000 250,000 200,000 200,000 (290,000) 572,396 282,396 (779,549) 779,549 98,298 1,301 ,945 1,li00,243 (2,342,072) 3,742,315 1,400,243 137,000 (137 ,000) 14,587 14,587 (14,765) 14,765 136,622 (122,235) 14,587 2,310,000 (2,310,000) 537,930 537,930 (77, 134) 77,134 2. 770,796 (2,232,866) 537.930 3,275,000 (3,275,000) 995,948 995,948 (352,251) 352,251 3,918,697 (2,922,749) 995,948 6,826,315 (5,277,850) 1,548,465 5,500 (5,500) 5,500 (5.500) 7,821,708 (4 ,873 ,000) 2,948,708 (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Purchase and sale of joint ~1orks equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The fol lowing 1978-79 capital budget l tems have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$8,000: This it1!m is funded <>nnually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$28,000: Expenses arc nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$li00,53S: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar tran~fcr in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pcndinq determination re user charges. (d) Transfer ACO to FO SS,516: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue. ~llsccl laneous projects. (4) Revised cost estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment requirement is not waived an additional$ 1,626.000 in local funds will be required, (6) To serve users presently outside the District. To be p.1ld for from annexation and conncc:tion fees. (5) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. II or ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW Rt-v ht I on I I /21i/79 Rl'Vl!>lon 2 1/26179 (6) (I) TOTAL FUNDS (2) (3) (li) (5) (UNAPPROrRIATEO BAL 1978-79 BALANCE TO ESTIMATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR BUDGET BC PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATIOHS ADDITIONAL FUNDING TREATMENT PLANT -(I) Plant Expansion Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEMS -(2) Ocean Avenue Trunk Coast Highway Trunk, Reach I and Portion of Reach 2 and Newland St. Interceptor Coast Highway Trunk, Portion of Reach 2 Warner Ave. Relief Sewer Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Slater Pump Station Upgrade and New Force Hain Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 3 Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 4 ·Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 5 Edwards Trunk, Reach I Golden West Interceptor Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 6 Edwards Trunk, Reaches 2 & 3 Warner Ave. Sewer Purchase McFadden Ave. Relief Sewer Edinger Ave. Interceptor Heil Ave. Relief Sewer Graham St. Sewer Purchase Springdale Trunk Sewer ·~ SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL MASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT 1951 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve 1958 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL ~ 7,871,000 7,871,000 50,000 4,000,000-(4) 1,400,000-(li) 230,000 375,000-(3) 6,055,000 400,000-(5) 850,000-(4) 501,000 1 ,000,000 900,000-(4) 309,000 1,lt89,000 600,000-(4) 250,000 124,000 100,000 156,000 104,ooo 670,000 7,453,000 13,508,000 1li8,000 19,050 167,0SO 700,000 129,750 829,750 996,800 22,375,800 APPROPRIATION OR (APPROPRIATED) GRANTS (2,137.967) 5,733,033 (3,871,000) (1, 795 ,000) ~ (1,430,000) (3 ,225,000) (5,362,967) I 2,508,033 (3,871,000) (50,000) (2,201,000) l~ 3,199,:>00 (3,480,000) (230,000) I (1,255,499) (880, '199) (3. 736 ,499) . 2,318,501 (3,480,000) li00,000 850,000 501,000 1,000,000 900,000 309,000 1,489,000 600,000 250,000 124,000 100,000 156,000 104,000 670,000 -o-7,453,000 (3. 736. 499) I 9, 771,501 (3,480,000) (12 ,ODO) 136,000 (3,550) 15,500 (13,700) (13,700) (29 ,250) 137,800 (50,000) 650,000 (22 ,500) 107,250 (46,501) (li6,501) (119,001) I 710,7'19 (148,251) I I 848,5'19 (9,247 ,717) I 13, 128,083 (7. 351 ,000) l (1) 1978·79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 MGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). ANO RESERVES REQUIRED (1,862,033) 3,225,000 1,362,967 -o- ·281,000 931,832 51,333 1,212,832 51,333 (400,000) (850,000) 501,000 1,000,000 900,000 309,000 1,489,000 (600,000) 250,000 124,000 100,000 156,000 104,ooo 670,000 (l,850,000) 5,603,000 (637, 168) 5,654,333 ( 136,ooo) 15,500 13,700 (122 ,300) 15,500 (650,000) 107,250 (603,499) 107,250 (725,799) 122,750 -o-5, 777,083 Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$7,000: This item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$25,1100: Expenses arc nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$1159,3911: To cover Pmp. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (3) Miscellaneous Projects. (11) Revised cost estimate ( .:w Project (~f full second.1ry treatment requirement is not waived, an additional $1,292,000 in local funds will be required, (7) SWRCB has authorized the Districts to file an application for con~truction grant on this project. (6) ·' SlN3WnJoa 9NilHOddns GNV SNOilnlOS3H e-1\-! ~ ,-.... -/:; J --... . JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 13, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 44794 ~44795 44796 44797 44798 44799 44800 44801 44802 44803 44804 44805 44806 44807 44808 44809 44810 44811 44812 44813 44814 44815 44816 44817 44818 '--'44819 44820 44821 44822 44823 44824 44825 44826 44827 44828 44829 44830' 44831 44832 44833 44834 44835 44836 44837 44838 44839 44840 44841 44842 44843 ~4844 44845 44846 44847 "A-1" A & 8 Reflectorizing, Traffic Cones Air California, Air Fare Allied Colloids, Chemical Coagulents American Air Filter, Inc., Engine Parts American Kleaner Mfg. Co., Inc., Valve Supplies The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts Automated Deburring Supply, Safety Equipment Bacon Door Co., Inc., Doors Banning Battery Co., Batteries Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts G & R Reconditioning Co., Pump Repair CS Company, Freight Caddylak Sy~tems, Inc., Controls Calif. Assoc. of Sanitation Agencies, CASA Conference Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Controlco, Controls Control Specialists, Inc., Controls Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts $ 302.74 74.00 42,454.80 29.93 28.51 548.54 288.32 81.30 42.31 130.57 565.00 13.45 319.78 200.00 5,057.66 54.06 687.01 399.36 3,286.00 Count1 Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Workers' Comp. Fund Mr. Crane, Crane Rental 21.45 111.92 163.81 1,158.95 372.00 116. 06 56.00 Charles P. Crowley Co., Pump Parts Culligan Deionized Water Service, Water Exchange· De Guelle & Sons Glass Co., Door Repair George DeMatteo, Employee Mileage . Diesel Control Corp., Engine Parts Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Envirotech-Sparling, Frei2ht Erawan Garden Hotel, C.A.S.A., Conference Filter Supply Co., Engine Parts Fischer & Porter Co., Electrical Supplies Flo-Systems, Pump Parts Fountain Valley Lock & Safe, Keys Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Engine Rep~ir A.M. Gardner Co., Glass Tubing General Electric Co., Motor Rep~ir General Telephone Co., Telephone Service Gould, Inc.-Warren & Baily Division, Electrical Supplies Jules D. Gratiot Co., Inc., Compressor Parts Great Pacific Equipment Co., Truck Parts Groth Chevrolet Co., Truck Parts Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Leasing David A. Hodgson, Employee Mileage Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Parts Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co., Chemicals City of Huntington Beach, Water I.S. I. West, Pump Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supply King Bearing, Inc., Machine Parts AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS- 199.30 31.86 14.58 945.56 3,000.00 8.70 170.43 212.60 2,107.88 548.87 26.57 135.00 127.33 716. 20 3,856.29 29.06 382.38 450.98 69.96 819.23 14.25 306.55 2,075.68 10.64 76.98 2.75 536.69 1,143.49 "l\-1" > JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 13, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 44848 44849 44850 44851 44852 44853 44854 44855 44856 44857 44858 44859 44860 44861 44862 44863 44864 44865 44866 44867 44868 44869 44870 44871 44872 44873 44874 44875 44876 44877 44878 44879 44880 -44881 44882 44883 44884 44885 44886 44887 44888 44889 44890 44891 44892 44893 44895 44896 44897 44898 44899 44900 Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies LFE Environmental Labs, Lab Analysis L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lighting Distributors, Inc., Electrical Supplies Long Beach Safety Council, Safety Posters Loomis Aircraft, Inc., Aerial Photo McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Repair Morgan Equipment Co., Truck Parts National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware Occidental College-Cashier, Travel Boat Rental · OFCCO Construction Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Electrical Supplies Pacific Wire Products of Calif., Small Hardware Paul-Munroe Hydraulics, Inc., Freight Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Lawnmower Parts Pennwalt Corp., Engine Parts Pettibone Corp., Heavy Equipment Parts Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Postmaster, Postage Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Productool, Inc., Small Tools Quality Building Supply, Sand The Register, Classifi~d.Advertisigg Republic Engines, Truck Parts Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Jerry Roberts Concrete Pumping, Pump Service Ruffs Saw Service, Saw Sharpening Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electrical Supplies Shepherd Machinery Co., Truck Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas Starow Steel, Steel Stock Super Chem Corp., Chemical Drum TFI Building Materials, Valves Taylor-Dunn, Electrical Supplies Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Cell Recharging United Parcel Service, Delivery Service United States Elevator Corp., Elevator·.Repai~: U.S. Industrial Glove Co., Safety Supplies Utilities Supply Co., Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Lab Supplies Valley Cities Supply Co., Pipe Supply VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies John R. Waples, Odor Consulting Waukesha Engine Servicentcr, Engine Parts Western Electronic Supply Corp., Electrical Supplies Western Salt Co., Salt Western State Measures, Electrical Supplies AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 586.95 346.91 30.00 1,320.26 14.58 95.96 152.75 150.00 57.66 594.03 207.22 400.00 125.16 335.65 134.25 25.-87 28.52 229.20 207.37 447.36 500.00 18.00 264.62 96.27 246.10 38.11 1,859.91 50.00 104.26 327. 45 . 530.20 452.79 4.23 15,763.76 3,216.23 221.16 15.90 581.30 188.09 313.50 126.14 36.44 253.04 405.23 569.09 53.53 1,131.31 1,983.09 219.00 505.75 85.85 136.35 53.91 "A-2" u u JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY i3, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 14901. "--44902 44903 44904 44905 44906 44907 II A-3" Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Westinghouse Supply Co., Electrical Supplies Worthington Service Corp., Pump Repair Xerox Corp., Xerox Reproduction Elvin Hutchison, C.A.S.A. Conference Laurence J. Schmit, Director's Mileage Donald Winn, C.A.S.A. Conference TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 475.09 8.01 2,657.40 1,104.50 67.70 18.00 306.52 $115, 060. 87 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 13, 1979 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 44782 44783 44784 44785 44786 44787 44788 44789 44790 44791 44792 44793 II A-4" Automated Deburring Supply, Dry Blast Cab Butier Engineering, Inc., Contract Mgr P2-23 John Carollo Engineers, Revenue Program & P2-24 Design Eastman, Inc., File Cabinets Envirotech, Belt Press Rental Equinox-Malibu, .Contract J-4-2 C.H. Leavell & Co., Contract P2-23-3 Lowry & Associates, Waiver Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 H. C. Smith Construction Co.,· Contract P2-23-6 Triad Mechanical, Inc., Contract I-lR Valley Cities Supply, Vise TOTAL CORF TOTAL CORF AND' JOINT OPERATING ,,. AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS \ AMOUNT $ 2,293.87 v 13,258.50 39, 751. 91 217.81 1,590.00 54,974.70 53,164.85 273.23 32,920.35 1,204,159.50 73,458.85 167.72 $1,476,231.29 $1,591,292.16 "A-4" ; . INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 13, 1979 ~ WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY . IN FAVOR OF 44778 Christeve Corp., Contract 2-19 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO •. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 44779 44780 "--11 Colich & Sons, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-13-1 Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF . 44781 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contract 3-20-4 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FR TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 "B" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 207,890.91 207,890.91 AMOUNT 96,993.00 88,493.50 185,486.50 AMOUNT 88,447.50 $ 88,447.50 $ 273,934.00 "B" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 27, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 44926 44927 44928 44929 44930 44931 44932 44933 44934 . 44935 ·44936 44937 44938 44939 44940 44941 44942 44943 44944 44945 44946 44947 44948 .44949 44950 44951 44952 44953 44954 44955 44956 44957 44958 44959 44960 44961 44962 44963 44964 44965 44966 44967 44968 44969 44970 44971 44972 44973 44974 44975 44976 44977 44978 "C-1" Air California, Air Fare American Cyanamid Co., Chemicals The Anchor Packing Co., Gear Supplies Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Publication Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Banning Battery Co., Truck Batteries Beckman Instruments, Electrical Suppli6s Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete Mix Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts CS Company, Valves Cash Electronics. Electrical Subolies Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Gasoline College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc .. , Trt)ck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Fischer & Porter Co., Inlet Blocks F1o-Systems, Pump Parts Foutain Valley Camera, Film Processing City of Fullerton, Water A.N. Gardner Co., Glass Tubin~ General Electric Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co., Telephone Goldenwest Fertilize~ Co., Sludge Hauling Guaranty Chevrolet, Truck Parts Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hilti Fastening Systems, Electrical Supplies Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Honeywell, Inc., Roll Charts Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co., Chemicals Howard Supply Co., Truck Parts City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equip. Rentals, Sanding Machine Ideal Sawdust Co., Inc., Sawdust International Business Machine, Typewriter Supplies Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Restroom Fixtures Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Nozzle Kelly Pipe Co., Plumbing Supplies Kiene Diesel Accessories, Inc., Truck Parts King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Emery Cloth L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies LPE Environmental Labs, Lab Supplies L & N Uni form Supply Co. , l!ni form Service Lighting Distributors, Inc., Electrical Supplies Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprint Reproduction Motorola, Inc., Con~unications Repair Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts Pacific Tclephohc Co., Signal Circuits AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ \. AMOUNT 351.00 619.51 41. 34 33.20 118. 68 319.42 1,161.26 299.20 93.20 629.16 38.16 3,342.82 75.26 39.00 3,286.00 449.49 484.50 95.00 361.77 232.12 145.72 122.96 124.95 36.79 127.26 25.76 296.22 2,680.01 357.60 495.00 111. 88 167.20 185.95 1,655.40 144.80 9.80 18.75 839.20 34.34 46. 99 340. 71 129.85 90.91 141. 88 97.52 639. 48 10.00 1,255.74 18.13 246.56 758.66 134. 40 260.93 "C-1" ·• u u ; JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 27, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS · 1979 ~980 44981 44982 44983 44984 44985 44986 44987 44988 44989 44990 44991. 44992 44993 44994 44995 44996 44997 44998 44999 45000 45001 45002 45003 ·004 ~005 45006 45007 45008 45009 45010 "C-2" Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M.C. Patten Corp., Electrical Supplies Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Harold Primrose Ice, Samp11ng Ice Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal R.E.P. Index, Property Index Theodore Robins Ford, Truck Parts Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electrical Repairs Shepherd Machinery Co., Truck Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas Southwest Sewer Equipment, Hoses Sun Electric Corp., Motor Parts The Suppliers, Hand Tools J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash C.O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Keys Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Co., of Calif., Car Wash United Industrial Supply, Inc., Electrical Supplies Unit~d Parcel Service, Delivery Service United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Co., Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Cylinder Rental Valley Cities Supply Co., Electrical Supplies Milton D. Winston, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corp. , -Xerox Reproduction TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 1,974.50 397. 02 228.22 15.90 107.10 646.60 28.70 820.21 206.28 289.89 42.19 34,923.18 1,621.51 2,265.75 60.63 725.42 314.43 135.42 18.02 275.62 740. 09 6.58 53.00 6.52 178.91 43.12 > 59.40 569.80 48.18 6,236.00 4,599.16 1,903.45 $ 83,362.24 "C-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBTmARY 27, 1979 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OtrrLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 44921 44922 . 44923 44924 44925 "C-3" John Carollo Engineering/Greeley Hansen, Contract P2-23 Delphi Systems, Inc., Mini-Computer System Forkert Engineering, Contract Pl-17 . IRD Mechanalysis, Testing Equipment Reliance Electric Co., Centrifuge Motor TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNr $ 17,438.28 u 13,651.00 1,135.24 10,513.25 13,384.01 $ 56,121.78 $139,484. 02 u "C-3" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY ~7, 1979 DISTRICT NO. 1 . OPERATING FUND '-f'ARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 44916 44917 F.D.I., Inc., Use Charge Refund Universal Circuits, Use Charge Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 1 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 44918 State of California, Annex 30 Processing Fee TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 '....,; WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 44919 Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-20-3 and 3-13-1 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 7 WARRANT NO. OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 44920 State of California, Annex 81 and 69 Processing Fee TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 "D" AGENDA ITEM ~8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ $ . -'. ·. $ $ $ AMOUNT 1,913.00 43.00 1,956.00 AMOUNT ·.9S. 00 .95.00 AMOUNT 4,030.00 4,030.00 AMOUNT 190.00 190.00 "D" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. __ N_/_A _______ _ \_.i C. 0. NO • ___ 1 _________ _ CONTRACTOR: caliagua, Inc. DATE February 28, 1979 DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION JOB: Job No. J-6-lF Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~bl&:~) $ 1,644.24 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Reference: Contractor's letter dated February 5, 1979 The contractor was instructed to make field modifications to adapt the contract work with existing systems. The following work was required because of unforeseen difficulties encountered: ADD ... Item 1. Contractor was instructed to fabricate a 4-inch, 60° ·elbow to adapt existing to new piping system. Item 2. Contractor was instructed to replace portions of an existing airline which were defective and not spec- ified on the contract plans. Item 3. Miscellaneous labor required to adapt contract work to existing conditions. Item 4. Contractor was directed to adapt a 3-inch by 3-inch elbow in lieu of the 3-inch by 4-inch reducing elbow at the gas filter. The cut out in the floor could not accommodate the contract requir~rnents. $ 208.97 681.36 881.67 272.24 ADD $ 2,044.24 DEDUCT Item 1. Because of the unavailability of hot dipped galvan- ized pipe s~pports, the contractor was allowed to substitute cold rolled galvanized pipe supports. The substitution was allowed to expedite completion of the project. DEDUCT TOTAL ADD "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $ 400.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,644.24 "E-1" u u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: Caliagua, Inc. GRANT NO.~~N~/~A.a-.~~--~~~-- C. O. NO·--~~l=-~~--~--~~-- DATE~--~-~F~e~b~r~u=a=r~v---2~8-r-=1=9~79=----~ DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION JOB: __ ~~----~JO~B!2.....!N~O~·~J~-~6-~l~F:....------~~~------~----~~--~--~----------~---------- Extension of Contract Time The contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for the above items 18 calendar days TOTAL TIME EXTENSION 18 calendar days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME \._/ . Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extens~on this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: March 14, 1979 CALIAGUA, INC. ~ By Contractor December 28, 1978 45 Calendar Days February 10, 1979 18 Calendar Days 18 Calendar Days 63 Calendar Days February 28, 1979 0 r. i g i na 1 Contra ct Pr i ce $_2_0_,_4_6_7_._o_o ____ _ Prev. Auth. Changes $~ __ --::o~·~o~o ________ __ This Cha.nge (ADD)~~ $_1_,_64_4_._24_. ---- Amended Contract Price $ 22,111.24 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By Chief Engineer "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(A) ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" . r "F" RESOLUTION NO. 79-30 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lF AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS.NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lF, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Caliagua, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lF, on February 28, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended ·acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, V Section 3. That Job No. J-6-lF is hereby accepted as complete in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 28, 1978; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Caliagua, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No·. J-6-lF, "is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Dire~tors of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "F" v ,· ,i "G" RESOLUTION NO. 79-31 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. PW-061 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR DIGESTERS 5 AND 6, "C" AND "D", "F" AND "G", GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2·, JOB NO. PW-061 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents . . this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for DIGESTERS 5 AND 6, "C" AND "D", "F" AND "G", GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND.2, JOB NO. PW-06i, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for > bids for·said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized·to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. _AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" "H" RESOLUTION NO. 79-32 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. Pl-17 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF nm -BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER CLEANING BEDS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-17 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, no HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by.the Districts' Chief Engineer for UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER CLEANING BEDS AT RECLAf.1ATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB .NO. Pl-17, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for.said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "H II u u t~ ... RESOLUTION NO. 79-33 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS/GREELEY & HANSEN FOR DESIGN OF 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 RE PREPAf1..ATION OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR SAID FACILITIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTI-IORIZING EXECUTION OF ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREE~ffiNT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS/GREELEY .& HA..l-{SEN FOR DESIGN OF 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 RE PREPARATION OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR SAID FACILITIES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County' Sanitation District No. 1, acting on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers and Greeley &·Hansen for design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, pursuant to a construction grant · approved by the Envi~onmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources ~ Control Board; and, WHEREAS, said agreement provides that if the Engineers are to assist in the preparation of an operations and maintenance manual for the designed facilities, that such assistance shall be in accordance with specific terms and conditions set forth in a separate agreement between the Engineers and Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have requested that the Engineers provide such assistance, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the existing agreement to set forth the terms and conditions for said services in connection with preparation of an operations and maintenance manual for 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 to that certain agreement dated April 21, 1976, by and between County Sanitation District No. l, on behalf of itself and "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DIS.TRICTS "1-1" "l-2" County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, and John Carollo Engineers, a partnership, and'Greeley & Hansen, a partnership, providing for additional engineering services in connection with preparation of an operations and maintenance manual for the 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That an increase in the payment provision for said services is hereby authorized on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum additional amount not to exceed $75,000; and, Section 3. That .the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. I are hereby authorized and directed to execute said addendum on behalf ·of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-2 11 ·• II J II RESOLUTION NO. 79-34 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH TIIE IRVINE COMPANY RE DISTRICTS' PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL or SEWAGE SOLIDS AT COUNTY'S CLASS II-2 LANDFILL SITE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SA.t\JITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3·, 5, 6, 7 A\JD 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WI111 THE IRVINE COMPANY RE DISTRICTS' SEWAGE SOLIDS PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL OPERATION AT COUNTY'S CLASS II-2 LANDFILL SITE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, The Irvine Company owns a parcel of land leased to the County of Orange for the opera~ion of a landfill pursuant to applicable State regulations, which site is generally referred to as the Coyote Canyon Class II-2 Landfill; and, WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County have heretofore entered into an agreement with the County of Orange for processing and disposal of sewage solids at said Coyote Canyon site; and, WHEREAS, it is deemed appropriate for The Irvine Company, as lessor of said site, and the Districts to enter into an agreement relative to said processing and disposal operation at Coyote Canyon landfill site. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. .That the certain agreement dated by and ------- between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, and The Irvine Company, relative to the Districts' sewage solids processing and disposal operation at the County's Coyote Canyon Class II-2 landfill site, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and· the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. AGE~DA ITEM f9(J) -ALL DISTRICTS II j II "K" ' . .• City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIF ORN IA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT March 7, 1979 County Sanitation Districts of Orange P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Ray Lewis Chief Engineer Gentlemen: Subject: Warner Ave. Relief Sewer: Warner- Bolsa Chica-Los Patos Pursuan~ to our recent meeting regarding the construction of the Warner Avenue relief sewer, it was coneluded that the City would design and construct the sewer line and that the City will be reimbursed for that cost. The reimbursement will be from con- nection fees which we collect on behalf of District 11. The limits of construction is to be as follows: (.1) In Warner Avenue from 800 feet west of Graham street to Balsa Chica Street. . . (2) In Balsa Chica Street from Warner Avenue to Los Patos. (3) In Los Patos Avenue from Balsa Chica Street to Marina View Place. It is understood the relief line will be included in the Master Plan of District 11. The commitment covered in the Master Plan pre- pared by Keith and Associates that the District would buy from the City the existing sewer line in Warner Avenue from Springdale to Algonquin is to be voided. Very truly yours, /r~~?=- Director of Public Works HEH: jy AGENDA ITEM #9(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 11 "l<" ·" ·u u /OUTHERn CRLIFORnlA ,_. R//OCIRTIOn OF GOVERnmEnT/. 600 /outh Commonwealth Avenue • /uite 1000 • Loi' Rngelel' • California • 90005 • 213/385-1000 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ACTION REQUESTED BY APRIL 2, 1979 MODEL RESOLUTION ENCLOSED Public Officials in the South Coast 208 Area Vice-Mayor James Wilson, Presid~nt of SC~AG ~ J'~. . ~fi.r/I~ February 13, 1979 . Request for Action by Governing Board.to Corrnnit to Implement Actions Specified in the 208 Areawide Waste Trea'bnent Management Plan On October 31, 1978, the draft 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan was transmitted to your jurisdiction for review, with particular reference to various water quality actions specified in the plan for your jurisdiction to implement .. . I am· pleased to announce that on February 1, 1979, the SCAG Executive Com- mittee approved the 208 Plan, with substantial revisions based upon comments submitted by agencies such as yours, public interest groups, individuals and also various SCAG Committees which have actively reviewed the plan. At the time of its approval, the Executive Committee authorized SCAG to proceed with securing commitments for implementation from all agencies identified in the plan to carry out one or more actions. Such commitments are required under a federal memorandum, (42 Federal Register 44776, September 6, 1977), and are intended to demonstrate a wi.11 ingness to proceed to carry out actions identified in the plan. At this point in time, we are requesting that your governing board adopt a resolution stating its intent to carry out those actions recommended for your jurisdiction.. Responsibilities assigned to your jurisdiction are listed in a model resolution which is enclosed. Please note that in several cases the actions listed in the resolution have been revised from those you reviewed as part of the draft plan. We are requesting that your action be received at SCAG no later than April 2, 1979. The SCAG Executive Committee is scheduled to adopt the plan on April 5, 1979, after which the final plan and commitments for implementation will be transmitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency for certification. "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" r Public Officials in the South Coast 208 Area February 13, 1979 Page Two The success of the 208 Plan will rely on the cooperation of your agency, and others like it. Such success will insure that federally mandated water quality planning will continue to proceed with· maximum local government in- volvement in the South Coast Area. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Roger J. Riga, 208 Project Manager, at (213) 385-1000. cc: City Managers in the South Coast 208 Area . ·county Admir:tistraive Officers in the South Coast 208 Area Enclosure: Model Resolution "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS . . "L-2" • RESOLUTION NO. 79-35 COMMITIING TO IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SOUTif COAST AREAWIDE WASTE TREATMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO TIIE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE SOUTH COAST AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROPRIATE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et. seq., as amended) seeks to develop a cooperative Federal, State, regional and local government program to prevent and control sources of pollution to ground and surface waters in order to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation's waters; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, the Southern California Association of Governments (herein referred to as SCAG) has prepared an Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the South Coast area with the assistance of the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino, the City of Los Angeles, the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and the Ventura Regional County Sanitation District; and, WHEREAS, the Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the South Coast Area will be adopted by SCAG on April .5,-1979, and forwarded to the State Water Resources Control Board for certification and thereafter will be forwarded to the Federal.Environmental Protection Agency in compliance with Section 208 (b) (3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the South Coast Area proposes management agencies to be responsible for plan implementation and pursuant to published United States Environmental Protection Agency guidelines {42 Fed. Reg. 44777 -1977), must indicate each management agency's willingness to proceed to carry out its responsibilities as identified in the Plan; and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #12CB)-ALL DISTRICTS "M-1" "M-2" \~1EREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are assigned ~ertain responsibilities in the Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the .south Coast Area, approved by the SCAG E~ecutive Conunittee on February 1, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That. it is the .intent of the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to proc.eed with implementation of what is dee~ed their responsibilities as ·set forth in the Southern California Association of Governments 208 Areawide Waste· Treatment Management Plan, which said responsibilities are set forth below: Plan, design and construct the facilities necessary to meet the ,,. municipal waste treatment system needs as shown in the 1978-79 State Water Resources Control Board Clean Water Grant Project Priority List, consistent with the adopted areawide growth forecast shown in Table 10 of the approved 208 Plan and attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 2. That the Secretary be directed to forward copies of this resolution to the Southern California Association of Governments. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. u AGENDA ITEM #12(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" ,./-. PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. E N G I N E E R s ~ & c 0 N s T R u c T 0 R s "N" 1500 WEST NINTH STREET P. 0. BOX 1210 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 .-~· · . • \.;"1 I ' . • ·, ' . h -!' Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 March 1, 1979 Subject: Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drive at Rothrock Booster Station Gentlemen: We·have met with Mr. Jim Walton of the Waukesha Company regarding our bid for the Rothrock project. Mr. Walton has volunteered to help us overcome a part ·of the error. If Mr. Walton's suggestions can be effected the amount of our error can be reduced. The remaining deficit amount of it will then be small enough for us to absorb and not worth further consideration by the District. We herewith withdraw our request to the District to be re- lieved of . .:our bid. DGW:bb cc: Rourke & Woodruff Very truly yours, PAS/~' & 1LUD~I2 INC. / /;<:!JlJU!/.k{/l D. G. Whiteside Project Manager . AGENDA ITEM #13CA) -ALL DISTRICTS TELEPHONES: (714) 982·8803 (213) 620·9197 "N" "O" RESOLUTION NO. 79-36 AWARDING JOB NO. J-3-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 ,. 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INSTALLA- TION OF GAS ENGINES WITI-I GEAR DRIVES AT ROTHROCK OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, JOB NO. J-3-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE.AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. for INSTALLATION OF GAS ENGINES WITH GEAR DRIVES AT ROTHROCK OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, JOB NO. J-3-1, and the bid tabulation and ., proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, u Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. J-3-1 be awarded to Pascal & U Ludwig, Inc. in the tota~ amount of $247,225.00 in accordance.with the terms of thier bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary-of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into.and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED.at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #13(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "O" • • B I D T A n U L A '1' I 0 N S JI E E T ' . JOD NO • J-3-1 February 6, 1979 11:00 A.M • INSTALJ.,ATION OF Gl\S ENGINE;S WITH GEAR DRIVES AT ~ PROJEC'r TITLE RO'rlIROCJ( OUTFALL BOOS'fER S'rl\'rION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Installation. of engines and gear drives, removal and replacement of pumps, and miscellaneous other work. BUDGET. /\MOUN'!' $ -------ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 479,922.00 REMARl{S ~~~~~--~~~~~---~~~~~~~--~~-----~-~~--~ CONTHACTOR l. Pascal &·Ludwig, Inc. Upland, CA 2 • Triad Mechanical, Inc •. St~nton, CA .3. Waldinger Corporation · Des Moines, Iowa TOTAL DID . . $247,225 .. 00 321,123.00 329,745 .. 00 \,,,.!-----------------------~----------~----------------------·-------------.. 4. Equinox.Malibu · · Malibu, CA · 349,500,00 "P" I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. of Upland, California in the bid amount of $247,225.00, as the lowest and best bid. ~~ '• J:>~ ~ -~ , .. ·.~c-:-\t'""·: Donald Bogart ·~ Senior Engineer with the above recommendation. AGENDA ITEM #13(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "P" "". > ·' "Q" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNJA TELC:PHONES: AREA COOE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Ave~ue Fountain Valley, California 92708 March 8, 1979 Subject: Selection Conunittee Report for Engineering Services required for the Design of Santa Ana River Sewer Siphon In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee, as directed by the Boards of Directors action at the February 19, 1979 Board Meeting, has reviewed the proposals submitted by four qualified engineering firms. The firms evaluated were as follows: L. D. King, Inc. of Santa Ana Simpson-$teppat of Newport Beach Donald E. Stevens, Inc. of Costa Mesa Shaller & Lohr, Inc. of Newport Beach After careful review of their proposals and discussion with staff, the Selection Conunittee he~eby recommends the approval of L. D. King, Inc. of Santa Ana for a lump sum fee of $8,500. /s/ Paul Ryckoff Paul Ryckoff, Chairman District No. 5 /s/ Don Mcinnis Don Mcinnis, Chairman District No. 6 AGENDA ITEM #24(A) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "Q" u "R" RESOLUTION NO. 79-37 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH L. D. KING, INC. RE DESIGN OF SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH L. D. KING, INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE DESIGN OF SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement date~ by and ~~~~~~~~~ between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County and L. D. King, Inc. for engineering services in connection with design of the Santa Ana River Siphon, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum amount of $8,500.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation District No. 6, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #24Cs) -DISTRICTS 5 e 6 "R" "S" February 20, 1979 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Jamboree Road Trunk Sewer Dear Mr. Harper: lHE IRVINE COMPANY 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 644-3011 Reference is made to your February 14 letter requesting that The Irvine Company provide financial assistance to the District to enable construction of a trunk sewer in Jamboree Road. As pointed out in your letter, this project is an alter- native to the previously proposed Back Bay Trunk Sewer, which was denied by the State Coastal Commission due to environmental concerns. The present· situation appears essentially the same as in May 1976, when the Company and District executed an agreement which provided that we would advance up to $600,000 for construction of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer subject to reimburse- ment over a period of time as connection charges or· other fees are collected by the District. The Jamboree Trunk Sewer will essentially serve t~e same area as u the Back Bay Trunk previously proposed, only the location and design of the facil-\...,) ity has changed. In view of the previous agreement, I believe it is logical to pursue an amendment which would modify the project description and increase the a.mount of the funding to the current estimate of $1,000,000. In summary, The Irvine Company offers its cooperation in financing of the new trunk sewer subject to ratification by our Board of Directors. If the above pro- posal is acceptable, please advise me. Depending on your schedule requirements, you may also wish to initiate the revised agreement. If I may be of any assistance in this regard, please contact me. Sincerely, of Engineering Planning DWS:lab AGENDA ITEM #31 -DISTRICT 5 "S" ,' \.. .. \.,_) 3-14-79 -. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR.5:30 P.M. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 28TH. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARiICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: RUTH BAILEY SAM COOPER COMMENT ON THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM FROM LEE C. WHITEJ ATTORNEY FOR AMSA RE MODIFIED MARINE DISCHARGE PERMITS. WHITE, FINE & VERVILLE MEMORANDUM ----------. . TO: FROM: All Interested Parties Lee. c. Wbite ~. i~· . . . . ' SUBJ: Modified Marine Disdharge Permits ·DATE: March 9, 1979 On the basis of a telephone conv~rsation with Bob Bastian who is working with Scott Burdine on the regulations implement- ing the.modified marine discharge permit legislation, I can now report the latest wrinkle in one of the longest playing games at EPA Headquarters. Instead of issuing the regulations, EPA will publish on or about March 19, 1979, in the Federal Register a "Technical Support Document". This particular document which was insisted upon by the EPA General Counsel's office will contain voluminous and detailed instructions dealing with the technical items that will comprise the exhibits, appendices and attachments to the application for a·modified permit. For example, it will contain instructions for determi.ning indigenous aquatic population and detailed i~structions for determining .mixing zones. It is not ·clear to me why these must come out prior to the regulation, but that is the ·arrangement that will be used. Presumably, the regulations themselves will come out shortly.after the comment period on the Technical Support Document has ended and the required modifications, if any, for _the Technical Support Docu- ment are adopted. The comment period will be 30 days. Bastian said that all of the-226 applicants will have copies . of the Technical Support Document mailed to them directly, hopefully prior to the target date of March 19th'for the Federal Register. He did not sound happy about the new development, but was delighted to place the blame for the delay this time on "the lawye:is''·. MEETING DATE March 14, 1979 TIME. 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,S,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS f WELSH) • • • • • ·• • ·SHARP • • • • • • • lf --- ORTI z) • • • • • ·•·EVANS • • • • • • • ---. RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY ....... ~ -- CRANK) ••••• HUTCHISON ~ -- DISTRICT 2 lFRIEI>) •• • • •• • .WEDAA· • • • • • .~ -- RASHFORP) ••••• HOLT. • • •• • • -~ ----· ANTHONY) •••••• &LAftk ••••••• ~ ---- . COOPER• • • • • • ......,..----- ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM.····· .,,------- .WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON •••• ·£ __ -- 'EVANS)······· ·ORTIZ·······----- CULVER) • • • • • • ·PERRY· • • • • • ·~ ---- SEYMOUR)······ ROTH • • • • • • -~ ---- HOYT J • ·······.SMITH·······~ --- ADLER) •• • ••••• STANTON •••• -~--__ WINTERS) •••••• YfLA!e!tl!Z • • ·~ ---- DISTRICT 3 ADLER .•. • .••••• svALSTAD •••• __ll_ --- MEYER) ••••••• ·GRIFFIN·····~· __ -- PERRY) ......... CULVER······~ ___ _ COOPER) ••••••• GAMBI NA···· ·--JL ___ _ LACAYO)······ ·H~B!eff. • • • • ·~ ----SE ITZJ • ~ •••••• LASZLO· • ••• ·--lL ___ _ WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER······~ ___ _ FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON·······~ ___ _ EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ·······~ ___ _ NYBORG) ••••••• PRIEST······~ ___ _ YOUNG) • · ••••••• ROGET • • • • • • ·~ ___ _ SEYMOUR)· • • • • ·ROTH· • • • • • • ·~ ___ _ PATTINSON) .• _ ••• SIEBERT •••• ~ _. __ _ ZOMMICK); ·.• ••.• SYLVIA ••••• ·~ ___ _ 'ANTHONY)•·., •• ·WIEDER ••••• ·~ ___ _ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····~ ___ _ DISTRICT 5 . liUMMEL • • • • • • • ftYCKOFF • • • • ~ V' ----·· ANTHONY) •· • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ·~ ---- RYCKOFF) • • • • • • $TRA~88 • • • • ·~ ---- DISTRICT 6 . ~R¥CKOfF) •••••• MC ~NNI.S •••• ~ _. __ _ CRANK) •••••••• HUTt;HISON· • • V--___ _ RiLEY) · •••••••• ANTHONY····~ ---- DJ STRICT 7 HOYT • ) ••••••• SMJ.TH ••••••• .__..... ---- WAHNER • • • • • • ·GLOCKNER •••• .._.... ___ _ ! ANTHONY) •••••• &L>if\ ~-• • • • • • V' ---- ORTI z) ···•.• .. ···EVANS········ o;; ---- WELSH)········ SALTARELLI·~~ ___ _ GAIDO) • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· • ·~ ___ _ RYCKOFF) ••••• ·WILLIAMS· ••• ~ ---- DISTRICT li MAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON·. V' __ -- PATTINSQNJ· ···BAILEY······ ~------ANTHO~Y J •••• • • WJ'EDER • • • • • ._........-____ _ 2/14/79 ~RILEY)······· ···ANTHONY·••·~ -- PATTINSON) ••••• BAILEY ••••• ~ __ ANTHONY)...... CLARK ••••• ·-=-_. - . COOPER· • • • • V" ...;__ PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER..... V __ ORTIZ) ••••••••• EVANS •••••• ...ll.L ---- COOPER) •••••••• GAMBINA •••• ~ ~ WAHNE~). ••••••• GLOCKNER •• -~~ ROGET ••••••••• GRAHAM. • • • • ._.....---·- MEYER ••••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ~___:..__· RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT ••••••• ~ ------· WELLS) ••••••••• HOUSTON. • • • ~ __ LACAYO) •••••••• ~iGitJ..... ~ __ CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON •• ~ __ SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO •••• -~- RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC, INNIS •• -~- WE I SHAU PT) ••••• Ml LLER ••••• ~ -- F 1 NLA YSON) ••••• OLSON •••••• ~-- EVANS) ••••••••• ORTIZ •••••• _QJ __ _ MAC AL~ISTER) •• PATTINSON •• V __ CULVER •••••••• PERRY •••••• .,_....... -- NYBORG •••••••• PR I EST. • • • • .._..,.... -- ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••••• ~ -· _ YOUNGJ. •••••••• ROGET...... ~ __ SEYMOUB) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• ~ -- HUMME~) •••••••• RYSl<Q~f ••• -~ __ WELSH •••••••••. SALTARELLI.~ __ WElSH ••• ~ ••••• Sl:iARP •• ~ ••• ~ -- PATT I NSONJ ·.·.·.SI EBERT.... .,,.. __ HOYT)·········· SMITH.·····~ __ ADLER)····~··· .·STANTON.··· ._,, __ RYCKOff). • • • • • • !'FIU<tl!S. • • ·~ ___ . ADLER)········· SVAL'STAD. • • V" __ ZOMMICK). ······SYLVIA.···· 'c:::-- GAIDO). •• • • • • • • VARDOULIS. ·--__ WINTERS).···· •• VELASQUEZ;.--=-_. _ FRIED)········!' WEDAA. • • • • ·~ __ ANTHONY).······ WIEDER.··· .__JL. __ RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLIAMS ••• ~ -- VELASQUEZ) ••••• WINTERS ••• ·~-- OTHERS HARPER •••• ·-- ·SYLVESTER.·-- LEWIS ••••• ·-- CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN ••••• ·--· WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER ••• ·-- HOWARD •••• ·-- HUNT •••••• ·-- KEITH ••••• ·-- KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH ••••• ·-- MADDOX •••• ·-- MARTINSON •• __ PI ER SALL •• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •• ··-- MEETING DATE March 14, 1979 TIME 7:3o P.M. DisTRlcTs 1,2 ,3,s,6,7 & 11 if.£) DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS lWELSH) ····.·.··SHARP·.·····---__ ORTIZ) ········EVANS·······---__ RI LEY). ••••••• ANTHONY •••• ·----__ CRANK) .•••• HUTCH I SON ----__ DISTRICT 2 RASHFORp). •••• HO LT ....... ·--·--__ · { FR I ED) •••••• • • WED AA· • • • • • ·------ ANTHONY) ...... CLARK •••••• ·----__ COOPER· • • • • • ----ROGET) ........ GRAHAM •••••• [l.ih ___ _ .WEL LS) •••••••• HOUSTON ••••• _____ _ .EVANS) ••••• •• ·ORTIZ·····.·----__ CULVER).· ••• • -PERRY ·······--___ _ SEYMOUR). • • • • • ROTH • • • • • • • _____ _ HOYT) •• • •••••• SM ITH· ••••• ·--___ _ ADLER) •••••••• STANTON ••••• _____ _ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ •• ·--___ _ DISTRICT 3 ADLER .• ••••••• SVALSTAD •••• _____ _ MEYER) ••••••• -G RIFFIN.····--·· ___ _ PERRY) .••••••• CULVER······ · COOPER) ••• • •• -GAM BINA. • • • .------ LACAYO) ••••••• HUDSON······============ SEITZ).~ ..•••• LASZLO·• •••• _____ _ l~EI SHAUPT) ••.• MILLER .•••• ·--___ _ FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON ••••••• EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ-•••••• ------ NYBOR G) ••••••• PR I EST •••••• ------ YOUNG) •••••••• ROGE T ••••••• ------ SEYMOUR) .•••.• ROTH· .•••••• ------ PATTINSON) •••. SI EBERT •••• ==.~==== ZOMMICK) ••. •.,.SYLVIA •.•••• "ANTHONY)· •• , •. WIEDER •••••• ~ ---- VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS ••••• __ ======== DISTRICT 5 !liU MMEL) • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·----__ '. ANTHON Y)····· ·RI LEY·······------ RYCKOFF) ······STRAUSS·····------ DI STRICT 6 !RYCKOfF) •••••• MC ~NNI.S •.•• ______ · CRANK) .•••••••• HUTcHISON· · ·--___ _ RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• '--------- DISTRICT 7 HO YT • )' •••••. SM ITH •••.••. ____ _ l'iAHN ER · • • • • • ·GLOCKN ER •••• _____ _ ( /\NTH O~Y) • • • • • ·C LARK· • • • • • ·--___ _ (ORTI Z ····~ •• -EVANS .... •• .. _____ _ !WELSH • ·······SALT ARE LLI ·~--___ _ GAIDO)·· ••• ···VARDOULIS ··· RYCKOFF)·-····WILLIAMS···-~ ==== ==== DISTRICT li MAC ALLI f.T ER) ·PATTINSON·· ------ PATTIN SON)··· ·BM LEY· ..•. ~ __ -- ANTHONY) •••••• WJ 'EDER · • • •• ·~ ___ _ 2/14/79 !RILEY)······· ;.ANTHONY····--__ PATTIN SQN) ••••• BAILEY •••• ·--__ ANTHONY) •••••• CLARK •••••• ___ ._ . COOPER · • • • • ___ _ PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER •••• ·--__ ORT I z). ........ EVANS •••••• ___ _ COOPER) •••••••• GAMB I NA •••• ___ _ WAHNE~). ••••••• GLOCKNER ••• ____ . ROGET ••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ___ _ MEYER ••••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ___ _ RASH FORD). ••••• HOLT •.••••• __ . __ WELLS) ••••••••• HOU STON •••• ___ _ LACAYO) ........ HUDSON ••••• ___ _ CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON •• ___ _ SEITZ) ......... LASZ LO ••••• ___ _ RYCKOFF) •.••••• MC.INNIS ••• ___ _ WEISHAUPT) ..... MILLER ..... ___ _ FINLAYSON) ••••• OLSON •••••• ___ _ EVANS) ••••••••• ORTIZ •••••• ___ _ MAC ALrI STER) •• PATTINSON •• ___ _ CULVER •••••••• PERRY •••••• ___ _ NYBO RG •••••••• PRIEST ••••• ___ _ ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••••• ___ _ YOUNG) .•••••••• ROGET •••••• ___ _ SEYMOU8) ••••••• ROTH •.•.•.• ___ _ HUMME~) ........ RYCKOFF •••• ___ _ WELSH ••••••••• SALTARE LLI. ___ _ WELSH ••••••••• Sl:lARP •••••• ___ _ PATTINSON).···. SIEBERT.·.·--__ HOYT).········· SMITH.·····--__ ADLER)-···;.·· .·STANTON.···--__ RYCKOff). •••• •• ST RAUSS •• ··--__ . ADLER) .......... SVALSTAD ••• ___ _ ZOMM I CK) ••••••• SYLVIA •••• ·--__ GAIDO) •• , •••••• VARDOULIS. ·--__ WINTE RS ). • • • • •• VELA SQUEZ.". ___ _ FRI ED).· .. • .. • .• WEDAA. • • • • ·--__ ANTHO NY ).······ \•IIEDER •• •• ·--__ RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLIAMS .•• ___ _ VELAS QUE Z ) ••••• WINTERS •••• ___ _ OTHERS f,.i lfH-.J ' # 11 \1 t-. \If\..., r ~.f'"'..l •. ;~10'/ . #(1 J v HARP ER •••• ·-- ·SYLVESTER •• _L LEl'iIS •••••• ~ CLARKE. •••• ~ BRO\m ••••.• ___::t_. ../ WOODRUFF .•• __ HOH ENER •••• __ HOWARD ••••• ~ HUNT .••••• -~ KEITH ••••.• ~ KENNEY •••.• __ LYN CH •.••• ·-- MADDOX ••••• MA RT I NSON •• -Y- P I ERSAL L ..• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVER S •••• __ MARCH 14, 1979 MTG. NOTES Report of the Joint Chairman Saltarelli requested that Directors Smith, Roth, Wieder, Vardoulis and Mcinnis stay after the meeting for a few minutes. Invited Directors Winters and Anthony to attend Executive Committee meeting on March 28th. Read memo from Lee White. See attached. Report of the General Manager Re Lee White's memo, FAH stated that there is quite a controversy on what "indigenous population'' is. Also advised that there was a correction to be made in the Manager's Report re Item #9(q), item 3. Should be Graham Street, not Grand. Referred to supplemental agenda. Said we have added the closeout of the operations facilities at Plant No. 2. This project has been completed and have made closeout agreement with contractor. Said there is a change order for $59,000 for numerous items. This is the building that will house the operations center at Plant 2. In close- out agreement contractor has agreed to liquidated damages for failing to complete the job on time--charged for 57 days, $5700. Reported that he wou ld be attending legislative conference in Washington, D.C. next week. AMSA and WPCF will meet. Do not expect very much in the way of legislation this year for water pollution. Is going to be a strong emphasis on failure of the administration to move on ICR-- Industrial Cost Recovery for the industries. In 1972 Act are provisions that industries had to pay back to agencies and they, in turn, pay back to U.S. Treasury for funding by Federal Government. Very complicated situation and many agencies such as ourselves find that it is just a mess to figure out numbers and won't mean much in the end. Prevailed on Congress in 1977 to take a look at this and they put a moratorium for 18 months in which EPA was to look at this whole thing. They hired a firm and they did report and said it should be removed and EPA just ignored report. Feel we have a job on our hands in trying to knock this thing out. (7c) Report of the General Counsel TLW reported that he had one item of business not on the agenda . Asked the Chair to entertain some action on this non-agenda item. Advised Directors that a number of years ago we had an agreement with International Earp, now International Waste Systems. They designed a digester to treat sludge and wanted to conduct a R & D project on the Plant 2 site. We agreed to let them on and the only price of admission was they pay for utilities and share the results of research. Project went sour. Never got anywhere with it. Got involved with not paying a major contractor in L.A. who has filed suite against us. We have not tried to get him off the premises and he is continually on the verge of making a deal with somebody, the most recent being SERRA. They cancelled a~out a week ago. His lease expired June 9th and we put him on notice we were going to start charging rent. Tom said during the last few days, there has been a flurry of activity trying to get things settled. At 5:30 today got a phone call from International Waste and they have agreed to pay all of our material costs and expenses, not only on the Bragg claim, but will pay full cost to restore the site, and are willing to pay $10,000 rent from June, 1978, to one week from today. Directors asked why. Tom said they owe attorneys for Bragg Crane $40,000. Said he, FAH, WNC & REL met and discussed this and have agreed to take money. Previously considered charging them $40 per day but can't really justify that much . We won't let International Waste come on the property to get the equipment, and he really thinks he has got the better idea and wants to move it. Cooper asked if the Districts have this in writing or just verbal? TLW said nothing will be verbal. Everything will be in trust account. Perry so moved TLW's recommendation to accept offer. Motion seconded and carried. (12a) Re SCAG Resolution Saltarelli advised that in the Executive Committee meeting they agreed not to adopt subsections b. and c., only a. Said if anyone has any objections on projects, we can take that up. (!4 ) Re financial report for period ending December 31st (15) Anthony asked for comments from staff. JWS summarized that the Districts are operating within their budget at the present time. Said staff will be going over budget with Executive Committee on the 28th. Have target of expenditures of $800,000 less for first six months and we are ·even below that target level. Are going through some changes in accounting systems and preparing for conversion to revenue program next year. Are reviewing a little different allocation of overhead costs and as a result, may have to have some budget transfers. We will be coming to the Boards with the first review of the draft revenue program at the April meeting for tentative approval and-will come back for final approval at May meeting. Will be substantial impact on budget for future years. Are discussing some policies with members of Fiscal Policy Committee, working on job changes with regard to SCCWRP and health insurance for employees. Anthony questioned something re savings?? Was advised tha~ we have several positions not filled so have payroll savings. Asked if utility costs are going to go up. Said our budget for that will be $1.2 million for the next year. Re consolidation Saltarelli said there are some concerns because later in agenda we are asking the Districts to adjourn to meeting in the near future to discuss consolidation. Wedaa added re adjournments that in sounding out some of the early arrivals tonight in District 2, have tried to ascertain when might be a reasonable time to meet. Some of the Directors say they will not be Directors after t onight because of council -2- reorganizations and elections . Said if we are trying to set a meeting tonight, will set it with people not knowing about it yet. Think we might postpone this to another meeting . Asked for show of hands of Directors that know they will be leaving . 5 or 6. Saltarel l i stated that the purpose in giving this information was to allow Directors to study . Will defer adjournments until next meeting . Keep the materia l and pass on to any new representative from your agency and perhaps give him your ideas . Mcinnis requested these reports be recycled again to Directors rather than count on them passing them on. Also said he needed more informa - tion on why we are going to save money on trunk maintenance with consolidation. Frankly , don't understand. FAH advised that these figures on the goldenrod sheet have to do with budgets only. Because each of the Districts has its own sewer system, have to budget based on our best guess on how much work has to be done. Because of the seven Districts, actually budget more than we need. Williams asked when we get into meetings in my District on this , will we have same access to staff in answering questions as if we held meeting jointly? Was answered , yes , definitely. That is why we wanted to break it down into smal l er meetings so everybody can ask questions . Wedaa asked if Tom would reiterate how many Districts have to go along with conso l idation. TLW answered that technically, with provisions of County Sanitation District Act you would not need all seven Districts. However, under the terms of our current JAO Agreement and under the terms of a practical implementation, don't see how it could legally be reflected unless all seven Districts go along with it . It could be done so that 5 Districts could merge and two others stay alone but not practical. Saltarelli added, for all practical purposes, if everybody doesn 't do it, probably won't do it. The objectives won't be accomplished. (16) PMM Report Bill Butler reported that they met yesterday with Frank Peters of SWRCB. Said he will be putting final stamp of approval on revenue program document. Gave him a draft and he bought off on the program with very little modification. If we can forward with modifications, he will approve the document. If not approved , future grants would have been held up . Briefly reviewed a few items in the package mailed out with Executive Committee report . Are going to be coming back to Executive Committee and Joint Boards to address how we are going to charge and so forth . Re green status report in Exec . Report, as Mr. Sylvester indicated, will go back to E .C . with our draft the latter part of this month and come back to you next month . Re"E".AlLe rnative Ordinance Adoption Schedule, State Board has indicated we canno t ·proceed to adopt our ordinance until after we have adopted our fisc nl year budge t. Re yellow schedule, we do intend to go forward with an ordinance after we have executed the 1979-80 budget. Looking at August or September and will involve some public hearings!!!???!!? We anticipate adopting the rates in September. -3- Re approaches involved in adoption of revenue program, under PL 95 -217 still able to bill residential and some non-residential users on basis of ad valorem tax. Option is still availabl e to us . OK at lease for time being. What we have done in revenue program is to develop some contingent programs in the event we can't get revenues from ad valorem or legislature decides special districts can't get any money. One option is to go back on tax bill. Could also go to residents by city or private water bills. Is an administrative nightmare . Districts themselves could bill all residences dire ctly in Orange County . Extremely expensive. One othe r issue that is going to be difficu l t to handle is previously there was a l i ne item for Sanitation Dis t ricts ' charges that i denti- fied the Districts. That is no longer on the tax bill so have notification requirement. Still wondering how to notify peop l e what portion of their tax bi ll goes to operation of Sanitation District services . Could put flier in tax bill saying that we estimate $~~~ pays for Sanitation District services. Could put some information directly on tax bill indicating Sanitation District services are approximately % of the bill . Newspaper notification is not adequate to EPA . As far as dealing with industrial commercial users, we can bill them directly as we are doing right now. Will continue to use that approach . We do have to bill certain ins t itutional users that we haven 't done in the past , State and Federal institutions. Loca l government and schools are exempt. Re ICR requirements , they will deal only with people in the first year depending what Congress does with the ICR situation. If we have to bill anyone, will b e only large industrial users that are permitted at this point. Will be billing them directly . Also addressed in the revenue program are certain capital requirements. Are going forward with capital program . Have significant reserve , fully funded through 1983-84 assuming we get secondary treatment waiver. Are reviewing expansion and connection fees for the future . As far as reconstruction of existing faci l ities, will be handled by direct capita l charge when it is necessary and wil l fund through 1983 -84 . Will require certain modifications to our ordinance and will be coming back with it in August or September for your review , approva l and adoption . Asked if there were any questions. There were none. Sa l tarelli added that it has been noted in report that interest on reserves for construction resulted in $3 .9 million . (17c) ALL DISTRICTS -Other business Svalstad r equested that staff analyze how the Gann Amendment might affect special districts if it is passed by the public. Are ana l yzing it in our city and finding that it could be very dramatic. May not affect special districts but does affect our cities very drastical l y . Asked for a report from staff ahead of time before adopted . TLW advised that he has asked Mike Dillon of CASA and he is sending a packet of information. Gann is more defini tive a n d clear than Jarvis but are still some clarifi cations needed. Hoped t o review with staff by now but will have it before the April meet i ng . Maybe before the Executive Committee meeting. Will have something by E .C . mtg . -4 - .W 1-'1 I T E. F I N E & V E R V I L L E MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: All Interested Parties Lee -c. vfuite L .· !~· . SUBJ: Modified Marine riisdha;ge Permits ·DATE: March 9, 1979 On the basis of a telephone conv.ersation with Bob Bastian who is working with Scott Burdine on the regulations implement - ing the modified marine discharge permit legislation, I can now report the latest wrinkle in one of the longest playing games at EPA Headquarters. Instead of issuing the regulations, EPA will publish on or about March 19, 1979, in the Federal Register a "Technical Support Documen t". This particular document which was insisted upon b y the EPA General Counsel's office will conta in vo luminous a nd detailed instructions dealing with the technica l ·i tems that will comprise the exhibits, appendices and attachme nts to the application for a · modified permit. For example, it wil l contain instructions for d etermining indige nous aquatic population a nd detailed instructions for deterrn1n i ng .m ixing zones. It is not ·clear to me why these must come out prior to the regulation, but that is the ·a rran gemen t that will be. used. Presumably, the regulations the mse lves will come out shortly after the comment period on the Technic a l Support Docume nt has ended and the required modifications, if any, for .the Technical Support Docu- ment are adopted. The comment period will b e 30 d ay s. Bastian said that all of the -22 6 appli cants will have copies of the Techn.ical Support Document ma iled to them directly, hopefully prior to the targe t d a te of March 19th for the Federal Register. He did not so und h appy about the n ew development , but was delighted to place the blame for the delay this time on "the l awye.is 1•·, ... -:..