Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-02-14COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. a. sax 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"CRNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID CF'f"·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) February 7, 1979 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2, 3, 5, 6J 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1979 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY; CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. lTWS ! jc Schedu}:::..~ upcomi:1g_~~eting_~: TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 FISCAL, POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, February 20, at 11:00 a.m. DISTRICT l AD1.TOURNl~D MEE'I'ING Thursday, February 22, at 8:30 a.m. Orange County TraDsit District off ice 11222 A.cacia Paxk'1iay, Gar.den Grove -Wednesday, February 23, at 5:30 p.m. Month February March April May June July August September October November December January February W' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE CouNTY. CALIFOBNIA P.0.BOX 8127 · 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. L'AUFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962·2·111 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Meeting Date Conunittee Meeting Date Feb 14, 1979 Feb 28, 1979 Mar 14, 1979 Mar 28, 1979 Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979 June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979 Aug 8, 1979 None Scheduled Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979 Oct 10,, 1979 Oct 25,, 1979 Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979 Dec 12, 1979 None Scheduled Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980 Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980 II ~ -.·"-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ~ "-· ~County Sanitation Districts Post Off ice Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain. Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 14, 1979 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD, IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necess~ry (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -January 10, 1979, regular and February 7, 1979, special District 2 -January 10, 1979, regular District 3 -January 10, 1979, regular District 5 -January 10, 1979, regular District 6 -January 10, 1979, regular District 7 -January 10, 1979, regular District 11 -January 10, 1979, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS ~ :fsr _..,W ..... > Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See 'page ( s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5" NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( T ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by· one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, changing the time required for completion from 300 to 360 calendar days, including a Guarantee Form in the specifications and making a technical clarification (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-14, to receive and file bid tabulatic;>n and recommendation and awarding contract for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. in the amount of $247, 225. 00. See pages "E" and "F" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to .issue a purchase order contract to Cooper Energy Services for maintenance work on White Superior gas engines purchased for installation at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station (Job No. J-3-1) for a total amount not to exceed $10,000.00 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-15, approving plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "G" (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-16, accepting Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement therefor. See page "H" (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of July 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem fee basis, and authorizing an increase in the maximum fee from $20,000 to $27,500 (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-17, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Orange County Water District relative to data search to be performed by the Sanitation Districts in connection with the existing Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study; and providing for reimbursement for data search costs to the Districts. See page "!" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-18, adopting prevailing wage rates to be paid to all workers employed on public works contracts within the Districts, as determined by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations. See page "J" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) .f ... -. ~· (i) Consideration of motion approving value engineering for Solids U Handling and Dcwatering Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24, for a total outside professional services cost not to exceed $43,350.00; and authorizing the staff to engage the following individuals for professional services, on a per diem fee basis according to their proposals, for a.maximum fee not to exceed the amounts indicated: Tim Haug, PH.D.,,P.E. Engineering Science Mark Butier, P.E. Peter Barotti Bill Hoagland, P.E. Electrical Engineer (not yet selected) Maximum Fee $3,500.00 9,,950.00 9,950.00 9,950.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 $43,350.00 (j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Robin M. Lee (contractor's employee),, dated January 8, 1979, in the amount of $10,000.00 in connection with construction of Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, and refer to contractor and Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Kaspar G. Campbell, dated February 5, 1979, in the amount of $485.96 for alleged damages to his vehicle, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for ap·propriate action DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-23-2, approvlng plans· and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-1, (Santa Ana River crossing), and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "K" (m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-24-2, ordering annexation of 9.892 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-25-2, approving and authorizing execution of License Agreement with Los Caballeros Racquet and Sports Club, Ltd_. , et al. to occupy Districts' right of way for t~e Santa Ana River Interceptor in the vicinity of the westerly river bank, south of Warner, Contract No. 2-14-1. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- u u (10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 3 (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3~20-3, authorizing an addition of $7,215.94 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for extra work required in connection with miscellaneous undisclosed utility crossings and granting a time extension of three calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Santa Ana River Siphon, in accordance ·with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79~26-7, ordering .833 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast of Lomita Avenue and Santiago Boulevard, proposed Annexation No. 69 -Hauser Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-27-7, ordering 6.216 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed ·Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7 DISTRICT 11 (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-28-11, authorizing filing for Federal and State Grants for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 1 and Reach 2, and Newland Street Trunk Sewer, and providing certain assurances. See page "N" (t) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to engage a real estate appraiser for appraisal of State Parks and Beaches right of way in connection with construction of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $2,000. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- -''=' -·-.... (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items relative to the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file status report of General Counsel re agreement with County of Orange for permit to conduct sewage solids processing and disposal operation on County's Class II-2 landfill site. See page "0" (b) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 on February 7, 1979, directing the staff to prepare a negative declaration declaring that the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, will not have a significant effect on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof (c) Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 1 to make a negative declaration re Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-19, authorizing the General Manager to award and execute contract for Interim Sludge Facility Site Preparation at Coyote Canyon Landfill, Job No. PW-069, with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the total amount of $208,500.00, subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, and solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved by State Solid Waste Management Board; and rescinding Resolution No. 78-197 re award of said job. See pages "P" and "Q" (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding with Orange County Employees' Association re Operations and Maintenance employees for the period December 29, 1978, through November 29, 1979 (See separate report mailed with agenda material -If any Director wishes to discuss this matter further, the Boards may convene in executive session.) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-20 relating to classification, compensation and terms of employment (incorporating approved changes with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict ·therewith (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-21 establishing rules and regulations pertaining to conditions of employment (incorporating approved changes with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict therewith (15) ALL DISTRICTS Status report of Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts -6- u u c ., ~ .---r '4, (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-22, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-033 Rebid, to in the amount of $ --~~~~~~~~~~~ .....---.-~~~~~ (See supplemental agenda -bid opening date 2/13/79) (b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Thomas M. Dawes, currently an associate civil engineer with the County of Orange, as Senior Engineer, Range 1061E, Step 2.5, ($12.79/hr.) and accepting transfer of 630 hours accumulated sick leave, not to exceed $8,057.70, to be credited to this employee and utilized only when earned District sick leave is exhausted; and providing as a condition that no portion of the transferred accumulated sick leave is eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination, death or retirement. (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 8:30 a.m., February 22, 1979, at the Orange County Transit District office (19) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -7- (29) DISTRICT 2 Further consideration of request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection fees for a 30-unit low-cost housing project in the City of Brea (continued -- from January 10th meeting) : See page i 1R" U (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, supporting a motion to amend the District's Connection and Use Ordinance to permit a waiver of sewer connection fees for projects being constructed on municipally-owned land. See page "S" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re Possible Alternative Provisions of Ordinance Amendments re Waiver of Connection Fees. See page "T" (c) Discussion (d) Consideration of action on request.of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection fees (30) DISTRICT 2 ,,. (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, requesting waiver of connection fees for the Addition to Anaheim Stadium and the Anaheim Convention Center. See page "U" (b) Discussion (c) Consideration of action on request of City of Anaheim for waiver of connection fees (31) DISTRICT 2 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- u f ..._ 'ti'--' BOARDS OF DIRE CTORS Co unty San itation Districts Post Office Box 8127 II o f Ora nge Co unty, California 10844 Elli s Avenue Fou nta in Voll ey, Cal if ., 92708 Te lephones : JOINT BOARDS Areo Code 714 540-2910 9 6 2 -2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 14',, 19 79 -7: 30 p IM I ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFOR MATIO N ON ANY AGENDA ITEM ,, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI H~A D, IN ADDITION,, STAFF WI LL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFE RENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge o f Al l egian ce an d Inv o catio n (2) Roll Ca ll (3) Appoi n tmen t of Chai rmen p r o tern, if n ecessary (4) Recognition of s p e ci a l g u es t s ADJOURNMENTS PGSTED .• ~ COMP & MILEJ\G E .... v.:':. ... . FILES <;ET UP ...... V.:. ...... .. RESOLllT 0 1,s CERli'.IEO ... v LCTTE~S '.':RITTEN ............. . MINUTES V:RIHEN ... ~ .. . MINUTES HLED ................ - ~ \ ~ (5) Con sj deratj on of motj on to receive and fi 1 e mj nute ~xcerpt fyorn the Board of Supervisors sho1d•l[! appointment of Di rector and , if any IH!.'SON SUl'>LUArn!J.L AGiJ~DA al terna1.es to serve on the Dis:.ricts' Bo:1Hls as follows: Director [)jstrict Altc.rnatc ----- Jlhjlip L. Anthony 111omas F . Riley 2 Rnl]>h B. Clark (Active) 3 Hairictt Wj edc.r (hctive) 5 Thomas F . Ril ey (Active ) 1g meetings, t 6 'Jhomas F . Riley 7 Ra l ph B . Clar]( (Active) ) ·-·-·--(7 ) :R --·--- A/C _ .. Tl<l.R ·- ........ -·-------- ·······-·······-······- ll HarriHt Wje<lcr (Activ0) Di strict s -January 10, 1979 , regul ar, and J anuary 23 , 1979 , adjourned Di strict 6 Distri ct District ALL DI STR I CT S Repo rt s o f : 7 11 -Jan uary -J anu ary Janu ary @> Jo int Chairman @:D Ge n e r a l Ma n ager (c) General Counse l 10 , 1979, regu l a r 10, 1979 , regular 10 , 1979, regul ar .. (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion r atifying payment of claims of ROLL C/\LL VOTE·····--·-h . -d · d · · d 1 D · · f ( t e Joint an in i vi ua istricts as ollows: Each Director shall FILE -- LETTER __ ..... A/C __ .lKLR .... -u••••t 1;... - be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expres ses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page (s) CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page (s) DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO . 2 See page (s ) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page (s) llB II and llD" DISTRICT NO . 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page (s) llB II and "D" DISTRICT NO . 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS N\\S Roll Call Vot e or Cast Una nimous Ball ot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( T ) All ma tters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless a ny particular item is reque sted to be r emo ved from the consent ca l e ndar by a Director, s taff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will b e no separate discussion of th ese items. All items on the consent cal end a r will b e enacted by one action approving all motio n s , and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions inc l uded on the consent cal e ndar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the r egular order of business. item from the the chair , state the it em to be ~ge nda items appearing ~moved from same. + (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) "LE ·······~·· ...... . LeTTeR ............. . A/C .... TKLR -· ............. ___ FILE ................ .. FILE ................ ._ LEITER ............. . A/C .... TKLR ··- ,,~~~--~~­..hk!.}~--- f 1LE ................ .. LEITER ............. . A/C .... TKLRV ChW. ~~ FILE ................. . LEITER ............ .. A/C .... TKLR .... / .,. LO.~~~ .. - ~.Y. ........... . <9~--~-~ A/C .... TKLR .... ~~ FILE ................ .. LEnCR -··---·· ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motio~ approving Addendum No. 2 to the pl ans and specifications for Insta llation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, changing the time required for completion from 300 to 360 calendar days, including a Guarantee Form in the specifications and making a technical clarification ~~~f' ldtJ"-~<:a0-4e.&0" ~Q·~ ~"*~---~ ..,_GC. ~ onsideration1)if-Resolution No . 79 -1 4, to receive and file id tabulation and recommendation and awa rding contract for nstallation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig, nc. in the amount of $24 7, 225. 00. See pages "E" and llfll (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract to Cooper Energy Services for maintenance work on White Superior gas engines purchased for installation at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station (Job No . J-3-1) for a total amount not to exceed $10,000.00 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-15, approving plans and specifications ·for Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, and authorizing the General Manager to estab lish the date for receipt of bids. -See page "G" Resolution No. 79-16, a ccepting Digester Gas Piping y Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, a s comp l ete; authorizing exec ·ce of Completion; and approv~ng Final Closeout Agreeme nt therefor. (f) Consideration of motion amending Board act ion of July 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California ·Coastal Water -Research Project for services in connection with Districts 1 application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem fee basis, and authorizing an increase in the maximum fee from $20,000 to $2 7 ,500 (g) Consideration of Re s olution No. 79-17, approving and authorizing e xecution of agreement with .. Oran ge County Water District relative to data search to be performed by the Sanitation Districts in connection with the existing Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study; an d providing for reimbursement for data search costs (h) to the Districts. . See p a ge "I" Consideration of Resolution No. 79-18, adopting prevailing wage rates to be paid to all workers emp loyed on public works contracts within the Districts, as determined by the Director of the State A/C ... .TKLR~&..EL. ~~ Department of Industrial Relations. See page "J" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) @"):.~ ....... . r.lE ·--·-/ ®~ AfC •••. Tl<LR ---- f 1LE ··-·········bf ~-·- A/C •••• TKLR ·- FIL E •..•.............. LETTER .••.•.....•.•. FILE ············-- LETTER (.~!°.S,_ ,/ Oi . ...,..,... A/C .... TKLR -·· ~~···········­<l@ ~l. A/C .... TKLR - _,-··v.~.¥ ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion approving value engineering for Solids Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-24, for a total outside professional services cost not to exceed $40,400.00; and aut~orizing the staff to engage the following individuals for professional services, on a per diem fee basis according to their proposals, for a maximum fee not to exceed the amounts indicated: Tim Haug, PH.D.,P.E. Engineering Science Mark Butier, P.E. Peter Barotti Bill Hoagland, P .E . Electrical Engineer (not yet selected) Maximum Fee $3,500.00 9,950.00 9,950.00 7 , 000. 00 (not $9, 950) 5,000.00 5,000 .00 $40,400 .00 (not $43,350) (j) Consideration of motion to receive, file .and deny claim of - Robin M. Lee (contractor's employee), dated January 8, 1979, in the amount of $10,000.00 in connection with construction of Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No . I-IR, and refer to contractor and Districts' liability claims administrator-for -· appropriate action (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Kaspar G. Campbell, dated February 5, 1979, in the amount of $485.96 for alleged damages to his vehicle, and -refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for ap·propriate action DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration ~of Resolution No. 79-2~-2, approving plans and specifications for Olive ·Sub-Trw.nk -Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l, (Santa· Ana -River crossing), and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Se e page "K" (m) Consideration of Standard Resolution ·No. 79-24-2, ordering annexation of 9 .892 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to County Sani~ation District No. 2 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-25-2, approving and authorizing execution of License Agreement with Los Ca ball e ros Racquet and Sports Club, '.Ltd .. , et al. to occupy Districts' right of way for the Santa Ana River Interceptor in th e vicinity of th e westerly ~iver bank, south of Warner, Contract No . 2-14-1. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDA~ continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) FILE ................ ., LETTER .....•.......• A/C •... TKlR .... u ' ..-FILE ···············- Qt;.L-V LETTER1 ....•.•••••. - A/C .@~ FILE ·······-··---~~~C.. LETTE~ A/C .... TKlR ·- .. FILE ··t:~~C/ LETTER~ A/C .... TKLR ·- FILE ················- LETT ER···-······- A/C .... TKLR '\::o ~--- --·--··········-·-- ~---~-~---~ LETTER ···-··-····· A/c lKLR •••• .... ../ (t!f~J DISTRICT 3 (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 4 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $7,2 15 .94 to the contract with Kordick a nd Rados, J.V. for extra work required in connection with miscellaneous undisclosed utility crossings and granting a time extension of three calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (p) Consideration of motion authori zing the staff to so licit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Santa Ana River Siphon,in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 79-26-7, ordering .833 acres of territory-xo the .District in the vicinit ~ northeast-- of Lomita Avenue and Santiago Boulevard, proposed Annexation No. 69 -·liauser ·Annexation to County Sanitati-on "Distri·ct ·No. ·7 (r) Consideration of Standard Reso1ution No . 1 9-2 7 -7 , ordering 6 .216 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, -proposed Annexation No. 8 1 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation Di strict No . 7 DISTRICT 11 (s) (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-28-11, authorizing filing fo r Federal and State Grants £or Coast Highw ay Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 1 and Reach -2 , and New l and--5:tre.et :Trunk .Sewer,-and providing certain assurances :---See ·page ·11 N11 Con s ideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to engage a r eal estate appraiser for appraisal of State Parks and Beaches right of way in co nnection with con stru ction of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $2,000 . END DF CONSENT CALEND~R (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5 - (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items relative to the Sewage Sludge Management ~ @ ility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange: ti\ · qr~) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file status report ( ~"o 1~ of General Counsel re agreement with County of Orange for r permit to conduct sewage solids processing and disposal operation on County's Class II-2 landfill site. See page "0" FllE .................. f' LETIE /~r~) A/C ..•. lKl - -·······-··-- FI LE ·······-··-···- lffiER ···········- A/C ... .lKLR -· (c) (d) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 on February 7, 1979, directing the staff to prepare a negative declaration declaring that the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, will not have a significant effect on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 1 to make a negative declaration re Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, on behalf of itself a~d Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, .as Amended Roll Call Vote or Cast ~animous Ballot (). _____ _ Consideration of Resolution No. 79-19, ·authorizing the General Manager to award and execute contract for Interim Sludge Facility Site Preparation at Coyo.te-.Cany on ·Landfi 11, .Job .. No. -PW-069, -with John A. Artukovich Sons , Inc. i n the total amount -0f -$208,500.00, subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, and solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved by State Solid Waste Management Board; and rescinding Re s olution ~~- A/C .•.. lKLR ··- No. 78-197 re award of said job. See pages "P" and "Q" ~~-~ ~ ~· f .o. ~;2}. ALL DISTRICTS FI LE ················-ct\ \S ~-~ A/C .... l KLR ••.• Consideration of motion approving ·Memorandum of Understanding-with Orange County Employees ' Association re Oper.ations ~and_Maintenance employees for the period December 29, 1978, through November 29, 1979 (See separate report mailed with agenda material -If any .Director wishes to discuss this matter further, the Boards may convene in executive session.) (13) ALL -DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-20 relating to classi£ication, Rolul Call Vote Bor11 c,ast compensation and terms of employment (incorporating-approved changes nanimous a o \ '- FILE -···············-N\\o with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolut-ions --in conflict LETTER ···--····· therewith ~~~4) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No . 79-21 establishing rules and regulations pertaining to conditions of emp loyment (incorporating approved changes ·tton -ca1r·vote-or Cost Unanimous Ballot t\\\~ with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict therewith t R-------=~ ALL DISTRICTS A/c TKLR __ / Status report I .. ~ ··'-----------~~ ~--- of Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts -6- (16) ALL DI STRI CTS ,,.. Other business and communications or s uppleme ntal a'genda i tern s, if any (16-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-033 (Rebid), to American Cyanamid for the unit price of $1.46 per pound, for a ma ximum amount ..not to ITEMS ON SUPPLE ME NTAL AGCNDA fLE ~:=:-Ji\\~ ~ --.v exceed $87 ,089 .54, p l us applicab l e taxe s . See page "I" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Tilomas M. Dawes , current l y an associate civil eng ineer with the County of Orange, as A/C ... litKLR "j;>.>C,, 'O· , ·-/ ~l~ Senior Engineer, Range 1061E, Step 2.5, ($12 .79/hr.) and accepting t r a n s f er of 630 hours accumulated ·sick l e ave, not to excee d $8,057.70, to be credited to this employee and utilized only wh e n earne d District sick l eave is exhausted; and providing as a condition that no portion of the transferred a ccumulated sick leave i s eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination, death or retirement. (17) DI?TRICT 1 o"t;~ (t8) DISTRICT 1 .~. _. Q J Consideration of motion to a djourn ~,~.the Orange County Transit District ~ (19) DISTRICT 3 ~~~ (20) DISTRICT 3 to 8:30 a .m., February 22, 1979, at office ~·:~ or s uppl e mental agenda items, if ·any Consideration of motion to adjourn ~-~ (21) Dl\STRICT 5 · Otb~r busine s s and c~a tions or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn <i(' . .3..Q) (23) !STRICT 6 Other business-antl--c ~cations or s upplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 6 FiLE ···---·----~-Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:3-c ~~f.) •DISTRICT 7 . A/C ···~ ~ Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~ lE (25-a) Consideration of motion to rece i ve and f i le request from Mr . & Mrs . ·--l~oN Daniel K. Walker for annexation of . 81 acres of territory to the SUPPLEM ENTAL AGENDA Dis t rict in the vicinity near the intersection of Rancho Santiago \ ~ and Equestrian Lane in unincorporated territory of the County of f'I\ Orange; and refer to staff for study and reco mme nda~ion, proposed Annexation No. 87 -Walker Annexation to County Sa ntation District No. 7 . See page "II" .(26) DISTRICT 7 . Con s ideration of motion to ad journ ~:_;t ........ ~t ions or s upp-re'mental agenda i tems, i f a ny (28) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to a?j ourn ~~ .3 I -7- ··- (29) DISTRICT 2 Further consideration of request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection fees for a 30-unit low-cost housing project in the City of Brea (continued · from January 10th meeting): See page "R" ~v ~-= (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, supporting the District's Connection a nd Use Ordinance of sewer connection fees for projects being letter from City of a motion to amend to permit a waiver constructed on \~1~ municipally-owned land. See page "S" (30) ~~r/' A/C •••• TKLR ••.• \, (b) (Y\~~ Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re Possible Alternative Provisions of Ordinance Amendments re Waiver of Connection Fees. See page "T" @ Discussion (R_.~ ~s) r~ 1, ~~ \-11-1q.,~-1 ~-'>'t) \@ Consideration of action on request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection fees DISTRICT 2 (a) (® @) .Consideration -of motion -to receive ~and -£ile ~letter £rom -Ci~y :of u7 Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, requesting waiver of connection fees· for the ·Addition ·to Anaheim ·stadium and the ·Anaheim Convention · - Center. See page "U" Di scussion Consideration of action on request ~o£ City of Anaheim :::for ·waiver of co nn ection f ees (31) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or s uppl ~mental agenda items ; if a ny - (32) DISTRICT 2 Con sideration ·of motion to adjourn q_!. 9'D -8 - ,1 II -r BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County S11nit11tion Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Or11nge County, C11lifornla l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540·2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 14',, 1979 -7: 30 p IM I ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM,, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITION,, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AJ /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary ( 4) Recognition of s_pecia l gues ts ALL OTSTRICTS ,, if any (5) IT!'/.'.S ON 5UPPlEIALl'l!Al AGtNDA ConsiC:cration of motion to receive and fi l e minut.e excerpt from the Board of Supervise-rs showine appointment of Director and a l ternates to serve on the Districts ' Boards as follows: (7) Director District Al ternate Philip L. Anthony Thomas F. Riley 2 Ralph B. Cl ark (Actjvc) 3 Harriett Wi eder (Active) 5 Ti iomas F. Riley (A ct:i ve) "6 TI1omas F. Riley 7 Ralph B. Clark {Active) 11 Harriett Wieder {A ct ive) District 5 -January 10, 1979, regular, and January 23, 1979, adjourned District 6 -January District 7 -January District ll -January ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) (b) (c) Ge neral Counsel 10, 1979, regular 10, 1979, regular 10, 1979, regular lg meetings, (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ROL L Ci\LL VOTE •...•• -~.-h . . d . d. . d l D. . f 11 (E h D. h 11 t e Joint an 1n 1v1 ua 1str1cts as o ows: ac 1rector s a be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DI STRICT NO . 2 See page (s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO . 3 See page (s) "B II and DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS I CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( T ) All matt~rs placed upon ~he consent cal endar are -considered a~ not requiring discussion or further exp lan ation and unless any particular item is requested to b e removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of the se items . All items on the consent c a lendar will be enacted by one action a pproving all motions, and casting a una nimous b a llot for resolutions .inc luded on the con sent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar sha ll be considered in the regu lar·order of business. .tl'f:At of the public who wish to remove an item from the rs~ #9 calendar shall, upon recogni tion by the chair, state .t '/:' l,r-(bj address and designate by lett er th e item to be l'.c-"~ ~ l'""' J;o +. he '7 ·~: h consent calendar . M 1119 .{> p ~c- ol'f: r~J ..f>oAt -1>c-Ato * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CoR~ SJ>R.tc /)"lsc'/~b p cl'.to -Q:-4' /:' "1.1, ~ ..f>oAt <: any i terns are to be deleted from ~ 0'11 ~oAt .lub1i Co.-v · Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimo us Ballot .t~ "lee-. r.tc ~~.tl' Con!>_ ~ #. :i\tb1 .t,,y b C"l.<, ~ 11 agenda i terns a ppearing on the ..... 9 (-i)· • '.(~ ~'1tb 'v r emove d from same. . CJ>o ~.{> ~s,· Atl'c (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motio~ approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, changing the time required for completion from 300 to. 360 calendar days, including a Guarantee Form in the specifications and making a technical c l arification (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-14, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommend a tion and awarding contract for Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig, I nc. in the amount of $24 7, 225 . 00. See pages "E" and \}iV "F" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract to Cooper Energy Services for maintenance work on White Superior gas engines purchased for installation at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station (Job No . J-3-1) for a total amount not to exceed $10,000 .00 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79 -15, approving plans and specifications for Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. -PW-070, and authorizing the General Manager to estab lish the date for receipt of bids. See page "G" of Resolution .No. 79-16, accepting Digester Gas Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, as complete; authorizing exec ce of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement therefor .. ee (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of July 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem fee basis, and authorizing an increase in the maximum fee f rom $20,000 to $27,500 (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-17, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Orange County Water District relative to data search to be performed by the Sanitation Districts in connection with the existing Or a nge and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study; and providing for reimbursement for data search costs to the Districts. See page "I" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-18, adopting prevailing wage rates to be paid to all workers employed on public works contracts within the Districts, as d etermined by the Di r ector of the State Department of Industrial Relations. See page "J" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR c ontinued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Co n sideration of motion approvin g value engineering for Solids Handling and Dewatering Faci lities for 75 MGD Improved Tr eatment at P lant No . 2, Job No. P2 -24, for a total outside professional ser vices cost not to exceed $40,400 .00 ; a nd authorizing the s t aff to engage the fo l lowing individua l s for professional services , on a per die m fee b as i s according to their proposals, for a max imum fee not to exceed the amount s indica ted: Tim Haug, PH .D.,P.E. En gin eerin g Sc i ence Mark Butier, P.E . Peter Barotti Bill Hoag l and, P.E. Electrical En gineer (not yet se l ect e d) Maximum Fee $3 ,500 .00 9 ,950 .00 9,950.00 7, 000 . 00 (not $9, 950) 5,000.00 5,000 .00 $40,400 .00 (not $43,350) (j ) Consideration of motion t o -r eceive, file and deny claim of Robin M. Lee (contractor 's employee), dated January 8, 19 79 , in the amoun t of $1 0,000.00 in connection with construction of Re h abilita tion of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No . I -lR, and refer to contractor a nd Districts' liab ili t y c l aims administrator -for appropriat e action (k) Consideration of mo tion to receive , file and deny claim of Kaspar G. Campbell, dated February 5, 19 79 , in the amo unt of $485.96 for alleged dam ages -to his vehicle, a nd r efer to the Di s tricts ' liabi l ity c l aims adm ini strator fo r ap·propriate action DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-23-2 , approving p l ans -an d specifications for Olive Sub -Trunk Re pair , Contract No. 2 -5R-l, (Santa· Ana ·River crossin g), and authorizing the General Manager to estab lish the date for receipt of bids . See page "K" (m) Co n sideration of Standard Res olution No. 79-24 -2, ordering annexation of 9.892 acr es of territory to the District in the - vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract ~o. 1016 7 to Co unty Sanit ation Dl strict No. 2 (n) Consideration of Resol u tion No . 79-25-2, approving a nd authorizin g execut ion of License Agreeme nt with Los Caballeros Racq u et and Sports Club, Ltd . ., et a l. to occupy Districts ' right of way for the Santa Ana River Interceptor in t~e vicinity of the westerly iriver bank, south of Warner, Contract No . 2-14-1. See page "L" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 3 (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $7,215.94 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for extra work required in connection with miscellaneous undisclosed utility crossings and granting a time extension of three calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services in connection with design of the Santa Ana River Siphon,in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-26 -7, ordering .833 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity nQrtheast of Lomita Avenue and Santiago Boulevard, proposed Annexation No. 69 -Hauser Annexation ·to County ·Sanitation District No. 7 (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-27-7, ordering 6.216 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Randall Street anq Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7 DISTRICT 11 (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-28-11, authorizing filing for Federal and State Grants for Coast ·Highway TrunK Sewer, Portion of Reach 1 and-Reach-2, and New l and Street Trunk Sewer, and providing certain assurances. See. page -"N" (t) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to engage a real estate appraiser for appraisal of State Parks and Beaches right ·of way i n connection with construction of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $2,000. END -OF CONSENT -CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5 - > (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items relative to the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file status r eport of General Counsel re agreement with County of Orange for p ermit to conduct sewage solids processing and disposal operntion on County's Class II-2 l andfill site. See page "0" (b) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 on February 7, 1979, directing the staff to prepa re a negative declaration declaring that the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, will not have a significant effect on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof (c) Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 1 to make a negative declaration re Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyot e Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-19, authorizing the General Manager to award and execute contract for Interim Sludge Facility Roll Call vote or cast Site Preparation at Coyote Canyon Landfill, Job No. PW-069, with Unanimo us Ballot John A. Artu kovich Sons, -Inc. in the t ota l amount of $208,500 .00, subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, a n d solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved by State Solid Waste Management Board; and rescinding Resolution No. 78-197 re award of said job. -See pages -"P" and "Q" (12) ALL DISTRICTS (13) Roll Call Vote or Cast Un animous Ballot (14) Roll Col: !Jo1e or Co1t Unanimous Ballot (15) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Und erstanding with Orange County Employees' Association re Operations and Maintenance employees for the period December 29, 1978; through November 29, 1979 (See separate report mailed with agenda material -If any Director wishes to discuss this matter further, the Boards may convene in executive session.) ALL -DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-20 relating to classification, compensation and terms of employment (incorporating approved changes with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict therewith ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 79-21 establishing rules and regulations pertaining to conditions of employment (incorporating approved changes with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict therewith ALL DISTRICTS Status report of Special Committee to Study. Reorganization of the Districts ( .} t;, Jo , ~ f _L ~ l ~t ~l (\}~) IJ -6- .-(16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any (16-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Polyelectrolyte Che mical Flocculent, Specification No. P-033 (Rebid), to American Cyanamid for the unit price of $1.46 per pound, for a maximum amount ..not to exceed $87 ,089. 54, plus applicable taxes. See page "!" ITEMS OH SUPPLEMENTAL A_GENDA (b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of 'Iflomas M. Dawes, currently an associate civil engineer with the County of Orange, as Senior Engineer, Range 1061E, Step 2.5, ($12.79/hr.) and accepting transfer of 630 hours accumulated ·sick leave, not to exceed $8,057 .70, to be credited to this employee and utilized only when earned District sick leave is exhausted; and providing as a condition that no portion of the transferred accumulated sick leave is eligible for sick leave payoff upon termination, death or retirement . (17) DISTRICT 1 Other bus i ness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 8:30 a.m., February 22, 1979, at the Orange County Transit District office ~-/ (19) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications · or suppleme ntal agenda items, ~f any (20) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~'.> v (21) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23 ) DI STRICT 6 Other business and communications --0r suppleme ntal agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn i};.,_. (25) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any (25-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Mr. & Mrs. Daniel K. Walker for annexation of .81 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity near the intersection of Rancho Santiago and Equestrian Lane in unincorporated territory of the County of Orange; and refer to staff for study and r e comm e ndation, proposed Annexation No. 87 -Walker Annexation to County Santation District ITEMS OH SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (26) (2 7) (28) No. 7. See page "II" DISTRICT 7 . Consideration of motion to adjourn \{;~) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or s uppl emental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 ~ Con s ideration of motion to adjourn ~ .., -7- . ,, (29) DISTRICT 2 (30) Further consideration of request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection fees for a 30 -un it low-cost housing project in the City of Brea (continued from January 10th meeting): See page "R" (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of Anaheim , dated January 25, 1979, supporting a motion to amend the District's Connection and Use Ordinance to permit a waiver of sewer connection fees for projects being constructed on municipally-owned land . See page 11 s 11 (b) Consideration of motion to rec eive and file report of General Counsel re Possible Alternative Provisions of Ordinance Amendments re Waiver of Connection Fees. See page "T" (c) Discussion (d) Consideration of action on request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of ( connection fees ~ l · ( cP ~ 6 4 /. t._!tt.' . t~, 4 , -t~ ,e,. (t."-' .uLv.. ). -1 'i)•,...... ' ( 1\ .. CT\,~~('..M (\~ ) .... ;. . ···'f'",'-' l'tJ ':"~L Wt DISTRICT 2 IJ ( I '; ·~ c J j.( ~ I ~ / r• j,. ... ' '-"~ f# · .• J>) ~ (a) Consideration of motion to receive and .file .letter _£ram City of ... Anaheim, dated January 25, 19 79, requesting waiver of connection fees for the Addition ·to Anaheim ··Stadiuni ~and the 'Anaheim -<:onvention . -... - Center. See page 11 0 11 (b) Discussion ( c) Consideration of action -on request· of City ·of Anaheim -for ·wai vet ·--- of connection fees (31) DISTRICT 2 (32) Other business and conununications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any DISTRICT .2 r Cons'idera·tion of motion to adjourn rl -8- /, (J ~c, > !"....,_:.. L" ( -- ;& ' ' ( ( .~- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS :; County Sanita ti o n Dist ric ts of O range Cou nty, Cal ifornia JOINT BOARDS SUPPLE MEN TAL AGENDA ITEMS FEB RUARY 14) 1979 -7:30 P.M. AL L DISTRICTS Post Ottico Bo x 812 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Cal if., 92708 T elephones : Are o Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (5) Con sideration of motion to receive and fil e minute excerpt fr om the Board of Sup e rvisors show i ng appointment of Director and a lte rnates to serve on the Districts ' Boards as follows: Director Distri ct Alternat.e Philip L. Ant hony 1 Th omas F. Riley 2 Ralph B. Cl ark (Active) 3 Harriett Wieder (Ac t ive) 5 1110mas F. Riley (A ctive) 6 Th omas F. Riley 7 Ra lph B. Cl ar k (A ctjve ) 11 Harriett Wieder (Active ) (16 -a) Consideration of motion to receive and fil e bid tabulation and recommendation a nd awarding purchase of Po lye l ectrolyte Chem:ical Flocculent, Sp ecification No . P-033 (R e bid ), to Ame rican Cyanamid for t h e unit price of $1 .46 per pound, for a maximum amount not to excee d $87,089 .5 4 , plus applicable taxes . See page "I" DISTRICT 7 (25-a) Consid eration of motion t o receive an d fil e r e quest from Mr. & Mrs. Daniel K. Wa l ker for annexat j on of .8 1 acres of territory to the Di strict in the vicinity n ear the i ntersect i on of Rancho Santi ag o and Equestrian Lan e in unincorporat e d t e rrit ory of the County of Or ange; an d refer to staff for study and r ec ommendation, propo s ed Ann exation No . 87 -Walker Annexation to County S~rntation Di stri ct No. 7. See page "II" • II I II B I D T A B U L I\ T I 0 N S H E E T SPE<;IFIC/\'J'ION NO. P-033 -Rcbj d .PROJECT TI'I'LE Pol ye 1 ect rolytc Chcm:i ca l Fl oc:cul cnt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PHOJ ECT DESCRIPTION furnish Po l ye J ect rol yte 01cmical Floccul ent for 12 to 18 month s per Spec . P-033 condit i ons . ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE $ 120,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 4 20, 000 ~~~~~~~~~ REMARKS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BIDDER LBS UNIT TOTAL BID 1. 59, 4 00 1.46 $ 87,089.54 American Cyanamid 913, 846 @ 6.5% Solids 0.0953 $ 87,089.54 2. 64, 35 0 l. 78· $114,5 43.00 CaJgon Corp. l,072',500 @ 6.0% Solids 0.1068 $l14,543.00 3. Allied Colloids 62;250 l. 93 $125,932.50 lj . Hercul es Inc. . 77, 85 0 2.24 $174,384.00 5. 6. 7. 8. 10 . AGE~DA ITEM ~16(A) .~LL DISTRICTS II I II "II" ''[XH IB IT A II PETITI ON FOR ANN EXATION Date: February 9 , 1979 To: Bo a rd of Directors County Sa ni ta tion Di str i c t No . 7 P.O. Bo x 8 1 27 Fountain Va lley, Cl\ 92 708 't It i s he r eby r equ es ted t ha t t he t e rr i tory ge ne ra ll y des crib ed as (indicate ar ea des cr i ption a nd/or ad j acent str eet in ter sect i on -Exa mpl e : in the city of Oran ge , nea r the inter sec ti on of Chapm an Ave nue a nd Sa ntia go Boulevard). 11 072 Rancho Santiago Boul eva rd, in th e unin corp orated a r ea of t he Coun ty of Or a nge , near t he int er secti on of Ra nc ho Sa nti aoo a nd Eques tr i a n La ne . and mor e pa rti c ularly descr i bed and shown on th e lega l des cr i pti on a nd map enclo sed he r ew ith which has be en pr e pa r ed in a ccordance wi t h the Distr ic t 's ann exati on pr oc edures , be annex ed t o the Di s t r i ct. Th e fol l owi ng i nformation i s al so s ubm i tted herewith i n connection with thi s r equ es t for annexat ion: Pro pert y Owner (I f mo r e t han on e , a t t ach sep ar a t e listi ng ) Name : Mr . & Mr s . Dani e l K. Wa l ker Addr ess : 12229 De l /\mo Blv d . ~~--~~----~~~~-~~-- City & St ate : Cer ri t os , Ca l i fo rni a 9 0701 Te l ep hon e No .: (213 ) 860-1231 Gross Ac rea ge : 0 .8 1 ~-~~~~-~- (to nea r est hundr edt h ) As sessed Value (I f mo r e t ha n one par cel , attac h s epa r ate li st ings) $64 70 .00 Number of Reg i s te r ed Vo ters : 2 ----- Al so e nc l osed i s the Ini t i a l Stu dy form required by the Loca l Agen cy Fo r mation Co mm i ssion (a nd a n Env ironme ntal lmpact Report if pr ep ar ed). Also a ch eck i n th e amount of $500 .00 r e r rc se nt in g t he Di str i c t 's pr0c e ss ing f ee i s inclu ded her cv!i t h. · Si gJlure of Property Own er(s ) ~·l/5.~Mkv lfJ~uJ~a--~V&-~- .~GE(lD .~ ITEM 1~25 ( t-J -DISTRICT 7 "J I" MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT ~ A County Sanitat ion Districts of Oran ge Coun ty, California JO IN T BO AR~S Meeting Date Februa r y 14, 1979 -7:30 p .m. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Te lephones: Arco Code 7 I 4 540-2910 962-2411 The f ollowing is a brief exp l a n ation o f the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclo s ed agenda and wh ich are not otherwis e self-explanatory . Warrant li sts are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting . To minimize the am ount of.redundancy a n d dup li ca tion in the a g end a mate rial and r educe the number o f comm ents i n the Mana g e r's Report , we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the ag enda itself , particularly with regard to c han g e orders and con- tracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed ch a nge ord e rs a re i nclude d in the supporting material as wel l as the b id t abul at ions for the contra cts being r ecomm e nded for awar d. J oint Boards No . 9-a -Approving Addendum No . 2 to 'Joh No'. ·J-3-1. The staff is requesting approva l of th is addendum which extends the time fo r compl~tion of the proj ec t from 300 to 360 days, as we ll a s making a t echnical cha nge to the specific a tions for the Instal- l ation of Gas Engines with Gear Dr ive s at Ro throck Outfall Booster Sta tion. No . 9-b -Awar d of Job No. J-3-1 -Ins t a ll ation of Gas Engines at Rothr~ck Outfall Bo oster Station . Bids were rece ived for the installation of t hr ee Districts' own ed gas engines and g ear drives a t the Ro t hrock Outfall Booster Station . Bid proposals from four contractor s rang ed from a hi gh of $349,500 to a low of $247 ,225 . The staff has discussed the scope of th e work with the contractor submitt i n g t h e lowest bid and he h as indica ted that in r evi ewing his prices a n d confirmations of material costs in prep a ring his bid p r oposal, that an erro r of $1 8 ,000 was ma de in t he quotation received f rom one of the eng ine suppliers of required p a rts . This morning , Pascal & Ludwig , Inc., of Upl a nd, California, who submitted t he lo west bid , indicated in a telephone conversa t ion with staff that th e y may request to be a l lowed to withdraw th e ir bid propo s al. This it e m will be discus s ed in de - tail at the Board meeting . The e n g ineer's e s timate for this work is $479,922 . No. 9-c -White Superior En g ine Maintenance Work. Two of the thr ee engines to be insta lled in the Rothrock Outfall Pump Station under Job No. J-3-1 were purch ase d by the Dis - tricts some time ago as "used equipment " as they had been previously sold and s hipp ed to a customer but never installed or operated. The Districts purchased these eng ine s for $5 5,45 0 each . (A bid of $76,318 was received a t the same time for a "new" engine of com - parable hors e power). Since these engines were stored f o r over t wo years, it was recognized th a t some clean up and refurbishin g wou l d be required prior to insta l l ation . The staff is r ecommending that the loc a l office of Cooper En erg y S erv i~es (The White Sup erior Dealer) be engaged to perform this necessary work on a per diem basis for an estimated cost of $5 ,000 per E'ngine, not to exceed $10,000 for both eng i nes. No. 9 -d -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Job PW -070 Fire Spri nkling Sy stem for Existing Warehouse. Last June, bids were received for add itions to the warehouse, including the installation of a fire s p rinkling s ystem i n the exist- i ng warehouse as required by the City of Fountain Valley Building Code . The bids receive d were in excess of the engineer's estimate and all bids were rejected and the staff was instructed to revise the p l ans to minimize costs and to rebid the project during a more competitive bid p eri od . Job PW -070 separates the fire sprinkler system for the existing warehouse as a single contract , thereby el i minating the sub contractor r e l ationship on the future warehouse expansion. The staff recommends appr oval of the plans and spec i fications and that the date to receive bids be established as Tuesday, March 27. The engineer's estimate for this project is $19,000. No. 9-e -Acceptirig Job J-6-lF as Comp l ete. I n December, the Board accepted the bid submitted by Caligua, I nc., in the amo u nt of $20,467 for the installation of the s l udge gas p i ping required to supply the digester gas fuel to the engine units at the Foster Outfall Booster Stat ion . The contractor has d i ligently prosecuted the work in record t ime without any change orders to the contract . The staff r ecommends acceptance of the work, approval of the Fina l Closeout Agreement, and authorization to execute the Notice of Completion. No. 9-f -Amendin~ Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authorization in Conn e ct ion with Wa i ver Appl ication . Last July , the Boards accepted the proposal from SCCWRP to perform nece ssary services required in connection with the prepara - tion of the appLication f6r wa iver of secondary treatment as r equired -2 - - by the EPA. It was ant i c ip ated that the fed era l requir eme nts wou ld be publishe d before the due date of Septemb er 24 , 1 978 , but it appears now that the fina l regulations will no t be pub li she d in the Feder a l Re g ister until mi d -March . One of the repo rting requirements c ontained in the waiver applicat ion regulations is an analys i s of the Districts ' influents and effluents of th e 65 identified toxi - c ants . The samplin g must be done to reflect b oth dry weather flows and wet weather flows . Anticipating that the appli c ation would be submit ted prior to the rainy season, SCCWRP was not requested to provide information regarding the wet weather flows. Now that we a r e in the rainy season, this information should be included i n the application fo r waiver for secondary treatmen t requirements . Th e. staff recommends a n amendme nt to the previous agreement with SCCWRP to provide the wet weather sampling and ana ly ses in an amount not to exceed $7 ,500. No . 9-g -Water Reuse Study. The District is a member a gency in the Orange/Los Ange les Counties Water Reuse Study, which involves the six major wa ter (potable and wastewater) agencies in this area, and is ·funded to 87% by the Fe deral a n d State Grant Programs. A s ubstantia l por tion of the data needed f or this study can be obtained from the agencies involved under a r eimbursement provision set forth in the grant cf fer and the Joint Powers Agreement . The San itation Dis tricts ' share of this work is quit e small and the staff is reconunending that we enter into a sub- a greement with the Orange County Water Distri ct for us to perform and be reimburs ed for approximate l y $10,200 o f force-account work required by the study. No . 9-h -Ado pting Preva iling Wage Rates f o r Public Works Con tracts. Th e resolution appearing in the agenda material adopts prevail - ing wage rates to be paid workers employed o n public works contracts as determined by the Director of the State De partment of Industrial Re lations . To comply with S ta te and Federa l requirements, the Dis - tricts must establish prevailing rates once each year . No . 9-i -Value Eng ine erin , Soli ds Handlin. F acilit i es for 75-m d Improved Treatment at l? ant E stimate Project Cost, ~12. ion. F edera l re gul ations r equire that all grant projects that cost in excess of $10 million include va l ue engin e ering (VE) procedures . This requirement is to ensure that the facil i ties are constructed in accorddnce with the best avai lable techno l ogy using money -saving construction procedures. Th e value eng ineering study that was per - formed on the 75-mgd of Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 resulted in about $1 million savings of a total contra ct of approximately $L~6 million. -3- A two-phase procedure for value eng ineerin g of the design of the solids handling and dewatering facilities h as been developed for the Boards' approva l. Pha se I will evaluate the siting, pro- cess design, and the propo s ed equipment, and Phase II will eva luate actual desig n, construction and ease of operation and maintenance. These phases wi ll be eva luated separately , at different time inter- vals, and will involve two value engineering teams. The tea ms will b e comprised of profes siona l s , most with previous VE experience and three members of the Staff 's staff. In accordance with the Boards ' selection procedures, it is hereby recorrnnended that the Directors approve the consultants ' proposals for the grant fundable value engineering team efforts as follows: Engineering Science, Inc. Phases I & Mark Butier, P.E. Phases I & Pete Barotti Phases I & Tim Haug, Ph.D. I P.E. Phase I Bill Hoagland, P.E. Phase II Electrical En g ineer (Not yet selected) Phase II TOTAL No. 9-j & k -Cl a ims Against the Districts. II II II $9,950 $9,950 $7,000 $3,500 $5,000 $5,000 40,400 We h ave received two cla im s against the Districts which we recorrnne nd the Boards deny an d refer to the contractor's and the Districts' liability a dmini str ator . District No. 2 No. 9-1 of Olive A for Re lacement During the period of hig h runoff c a used by the h eavy rains l ast year, the Olive and Orange Subtrunks cros sing the Santa Ana River were undermined and d a ma ged , necessitating replacement of these crossings. The Directors wi ll reca ll that the Orange Subtrunk was replaced, on an emergency basis, a nd put ba ck into operation within two weeks after the sewer was d amage d causing r aw sewa ge flows in the Santa Ana River. However, flows in the Oliv ~ Subtrunk were diverted to the Santa Ana River Inter ceptor and did not require replacement on an emergency basis. Repl accme n~ of t h e Olive Subtrunk at the Katella crossing o f ·the Santa Ana Rive r was d efe rred in order that con - struction could comm e nc e after April 15, thereby avoiding the rainy neason and the runoff f lows i n the Santa Ana River . -4- P l ans an d s pecifi ca tion s for this rep l aceme nt h ave b e en pre- pared and are r ead y t o so licit c o n s truc tion bids. Th e e n g in e er 's estimate for t hi s projec t i s $17 3 ,000, ap prox im ate l y 50% of th e c o s t wi l l b e re i mburse d b y the F eder a l Di sas ter F un d a s the y wi l l onl y fun d r eplacemen t in k ind. P l a n s a nd s pe c ificat ions f or this repl acement spec ify lower ing o f t h e sewer c r os sin g of the Sa n ta An a Rive r t o avoi d fu t u re d a ma ge b y h eavy s torm runo f f . No . 9-m -Order in g Annexation No . 30 -Tra ct 101 67 . Th e Local Agency Formation Commiss i o n has appr ove d th e Board's r equest for annexat i on of th i s 9 .892 annexat i on l ocated i n t he Ci ty of Anaheim in the vicinity of Countr y Hil l Road and Mohle r Dr i ve . Th e p roponents of this deve l opment have pai d a l l the requi red fees a n d the staff recommend s a d o p tion o f Resolu t ion No. 79 -24-2 order- ing said annexat i on which i s in con f orma n c e with t he Distr ict's Mas t e"!." P l a n. No. 9 -n -Authorizing Execution o f L i c e nse Agreemen t to Occupy Santa Ana River Inte rcept or Sewer Right of Way . Th e Los Caba ll eros Sp ort s & Rac q uet Cl ub , Inc., F o un ta i n Va l ley , h as requested permission to e n croach on the District 's 3 0' easement t o insta ll tennis courts and wooden b leachers for a so cc e r field . Th e staff has carefully reviewed the Racquet Club 's proposal and finds that it will not interfere with the normal operation of the Di strict's trunk sewer. The staff i s recounne nding the approval of a Li cense Agreement , in form approved by the General Counsel, to be executed by the Rac quet Club allowing surface use of the easement r i ght of way, holding the District harmless a nd the Racquet Club wi ll be responsib l e for remova l of any improvements to b e c on - stru cted thereon. Distric t No . 3 No. 9-o -Change Orde r No . 4 -Contract No. 3 -20-3 . Ko r dick & Rados , the jo i nt ventu re con tractors cons t ructing th e por t ion of the Knott Avenue I nterceptor f rom Linco l n Avenue to Or angeth orpe Avenue have encou ntered several u ti l ity i n terferences which were not de l ineated on the construction plans . These uti li ties wh ich the contractor e ncountered where addi t iona l costs were incu rred were water l ines , fire lines and traffi c sign al conduits . The staff r ecommends approval of Change Orde r No . 4 , an addition to the c on- t ract of $7,215 .94 . Distri cts Nos. 5 & 6 No . 9-p -Soliciting Eng ineering Propo sa l s for the Design of Santa Ana River Sipho n . Th e Coun ty Flood Contro l District i s planning the widen i n g o f -5- the Santa Ana River adjacent to Plant No. 2. The portion adjacent to the Plant will be deferred because of environmenta l h earings required by the Endangere d Species Act. To minimize the cost on the second barrel of the Sa n ta Ana River siphon, construction should be concurrent with the Flood Control District 's widening program, therefore the staff is reques ting solicitation of proposals for engineering services in connection with this desi gn. The staff, acting at the Board 's dir ec tion, has secured an approve d Coasta l Commission permit for this project . Solicitation of proposals for design will be don e in accordance with the Di stric t procedures for the selection of professional engineering services. District 7 lol\ No. 9-q -Ordering Ann exa tion No. }9_, -Hauser Annexation . Th e Local Agency Formation Commission has approved the B8ard's request to annex this .833 acre parcel in the unincorporated terri- tory in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Lomita Avenue . The proponents have paid all th e necessary fees for this s ingle-family deve lopment which i s in conformity with the District's Master Plan . Th e staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No . 79 -26 -7 ordering this a nnexation. No. 9-r -Orderin·g Annexa tion No. 8 1 -Tract 9407. This proposed annexat ion is 6.216 acres located in the City of Orange and has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Com- mis sion . The proponents have paid all the f ees on this annexat ion for the development of eight singl e -family residences, which is in conformity with the Di s trict's Master Plan. The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No . 79-27-7 ordering this annexation. District 11 No. 9-s -Authori z ing Filing for Federal and State Grants for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer . The staff has submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board .Pre liminary docume ntation requesting gran t assistance on the construction of the Co as t Highway Trunk Sewer from Treatment P l ant No . 2 to Lake Street . inclu<lirnt the New l a nd Street Trunk Sewer from the Coast Highway to the in terse ction of New l and a nd Hamilton Stree ts . Th e State staff h as r eviewed the District 's submittal and fee ls that a grant could be offered for this proiect . The staff is. therefore. requesting consideration of Res olution No. 79-28-11 authorizing the filin g of the nec essarv documentation for a Federal a nd State grant for this Coast Highway Tr unk Sewer. No. 9 -t -Authorizing the Ge n e ral Counsel to En g age Real Estate Appraiser in Connection with the Coast Hi ghway Trunk Sewer. Much of th e Coast Hi g hwa y Trunk Sewer will be built in the State -6- - P arks a nd Bea c hes p r o perty s outh er l y o f the Pac ific Coas t Hig h wa y . The State h as ind i cated tha t an easemen t wou l d be granted to t h e Di strict f or cons i deration of connec ting the fac il ities l ocat e d in th e State P ark . The State h as r equested an apprai sal of t h e ri gh t of way in o rder t h at the sewer e asement c a n be iss u ed to the Di s t r i c t . Th e sta f f i s r eq u est ing t hat t h e Ge n e r a l Counse l b e a uthor i zed to engage a r ea l es t ate appraiser fo r thi s pur pose i n a n amoun t not to excee d $2,000. All Dis t ric t s No. 1 1 -Status Report Relative to the Sewage Sludge Management Facility -Coyote Canyon Landfill. Last week, the Genera l Counse l and a staff member appeared before the Solid Wastes Management Board in Sacramento rel ative to our pend - ing appl i cation to dispose of processed solids at the Coyote Canyon landfill. A report from the General Counsel i s included in the agenda supporting material. As a r esu l t of t h e Sacramento meetings, the Genera l Counsel recommends that the Districts proceed immediately with the a doption of a Negative Dec laration in accordance with the CEQA requirements. District No . 1 met Wednesday morning, February 7 th , to instruct the staff to prepare a Negative Declarat ion for their consideration on Thursday, February 22nd . Action on I tems 11-b and 11-c will authorize District 1 to act on behalf of itself and the other Districts. Since it appears that the County Supervisors will approve the agreement with the Districts for the solids processing and sludge operations at the County landfi l l site on February 20th, and the State Solid Wastes Board will act on the 23rd fo l lowing the adoption of a Negat ive Declaration, it is the staff's recommendation that Resolution No . 79-19 (A genda Item 11-d) be approved authorizing the General Manager to awa rd and exec ute a contract for Job PW-069 for the site preparation in the total amount of $208,500, subject to the approvals of the agreement with the County and the Sol i d Waste Enforcement Agency. No . 1 2 -Emp l oyee Ne go tiations. A Memorandum of Und erstanding has been executed with repre - sentatives of the Operat ions and Maintenance employee unit . A separate confid e nt i a l report is included in the agenda materi a l for all active Directors . Nos . 1 3 & 14 -Oper at ions and Maintenance Employee Unit Com- pens at ion and Benefits . In the even t the Memorandum of Und ers tanding with the Operations and Maintena nc e em ployees is validated by the Districts 1 Boards of Directors , Resolutions Nos . 79 -20 and 79-2 1 implement the conditions agreed to in the MOU. -7- No. 15 -Status Report re Special Committee to Study Re - or gani zation . Ch a irman Smith will repor t to th e Directors as to the status of t he Committee's di sc u ssions . The Comm ittee l ast met on January 24th. No . 1 6 -a -Purchase of Po l ye l ectrolyte Chemical Flocculant. The Districts are taking new bids for chemicals utilized for the solids dewaterin g orocesses. They wi ll be received on February 13th. If satisfactory prices are received, t h e staff will recommend award as a supp lemental a ge nda item. No. 16-b -Employment of Senior Engineer. Mr. Torn Dawes, age 36, pre sently emp l oyed as Associate Civil Engineer with the Co unty of Or ange, has applied for the position of Senior Engineer with th e Distric ts . i1r. Dawes has been employed wi th the EMA for appr oximately 10% years, working principally on l arge flood, road and water p rojects. He has also served as the eng ineer for Orange County Waterworks District No . 8 . In seeking th e position of Senior Engineer with the Districts, Mr. Dawes has r equested that his sick leave, accumulated while an employee of th e County, be transferred to his employment with the Districts on c ondition that it would only be used after the earned sick leave while in the employment of the Districts was exhausted, and that the transferred sick leave from County service would not be con- sidered for payoff at t e rmination , death or re t ir ement . The maximum sick l eave liabi lity to the Districts wou ld be 630 hours , no t to exc ee d $8,057.70 . Th e staff recommends acceptance of Mr . Dawes r e quest; all other empl oymen t benefits wi ll be the same as offered to any new employee. He wil l be hired at Rang e 1061E , Step 2.5 ($12.79/hr .). Di strict No. 1 No. 18 -Adjournment to February 22nd. The Board wil l adjourn to 8 :30 a .m., F ebruary 22nd at the Orange Coun ty Transit Di stric t Administration offices in Garden Grove to consider the staff -prepared Negative Declaration in accord - ance with CEQA requir ements fo r the proposed so li ds process ing a nd di sposa l operat ions at the County l andfil l s ite . Di strict No. 2 Nos. 29 & 3 0 -Request for Waiver of Connection Fees . Item No . 29 is the further consideration of the reque s t of Breal, Inc ., for waiver of c onnection fees for a 30 -unit low -cost Senior Citi - zens Hou sing Project. Pursuant to the Board 's in struction on J anuary 10 t h, the Genera l Counsel h as prepared five possible alternate provisions to amend th e present District ordinance rel ative to waiver of conn ection fees . Item No. 30 is a request from the City 0£ An~heim for waiver of connection fees for addi t i o n s to t h e Anaheim Stadium and Convention Center . F red A. Harper General Mana ge r RE: AGENDA ITEM #9(B ) -ALL DISTRICTS PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC . TELEPHON ES: 1714) 982·8803 (213) 620-9 197 E N G N E E R s & c 0 N s T R u c T 0 R s 1500 WEST NINTH STREET P. 0 . BOX 1210 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 February 12, 1979 Cotmty Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Tothrock Outfall Booster Station -Job # J-3-1 Gentlemen: On February 6, 1979 bids for construction of the referenced project were publicly opened and read by the District . The undersigned, Pascal & Ludwi g , Inc., submitted the apparent low b{d in the total amount of $247,225.00. Thereafter, upon checking our bid sheets and estimate we discovered that a -large mistake was ma de in the preparation of our bid by which the sum of $15 ,069 .00 was erroneously omitted . The nature of the mistake is the failure through oversigh t to include in our b id any cost for the Falk Drive Coupli_ngs and Waukesha Drive Shafts . The mistake occurred under the following circumstances. Mr . Larry Watson r e ceived a lump sum bid fro m Waukesha which he tmderstood to include a ll engine accessories. In talking with Waukesha after the bid their quote in fact did not include drive couplings and drive shafts . The net effect of the mistake was that the b id we submitted to the District does not include any cost for the drive coupling and drive shafts . Therefore, our bid is at leas t $15,069.00 lower than we intended it to be. Because of the substantial magn itude of the above described mistake , we cannot accept an award of the contract and must reluctantly elect to rescind our bid . We further request that the District reli eve us of our bid because of said mistake and exon erate and return our bid bond. \0 ;._ .. t <:") L!j °' cc > LU N -.u c:::i l ·; l...W LL.. n:: ~ Cow:ity Sanit ation District of Orange County -2 -Fe b ruary 1 2, 1 979 All of the work sheets and estimates and other papers used in t he preparation :cf our bid, which reflect the mistake , are availabl e for your revie w at our offices. If you desire any further explantation or subst a ntiation of the mistake, we wi l l furnish whatever inf ormation is available . AJD:bb Received on February 9, 1979 Very truly yours , PASCAL & LUDWIG, I NC . c-:> /.~ _,/ ..... ~-· Armand J. De Weese Executive Vice President COU NTY .SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUN TY By . ) C ) ,.-., ,__, (f) . (..) DISTRICT 1 DIRECTORS -RE : AGENDA ITE M #ll(B) February 7, 1979 P U B L I C NOTI'CE TO ALL PARTIES CONCERNED: COUNTY SANITATION DIS TRICTS or O RANGE COUNTY. CALirORNIA P.0.l:lOX 8 127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFOflNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714) 962-241 1 Sub j ect: Notice of Prepara~ion of Negative Declarat ion Sewage Sludge Management Fac~lity , Coyote Canyon Landfill The Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co unty have ordered the prepara t ion of a Negative Dec l aration for a Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote ,,. Canyon Landfill , Irvine area for the drying and composting .of sewage sludge . As required under Sections 15066 and 15083 of th e State Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1 970 , as amended th i s "Notice of Preparation" declares that the Boards ·of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of .Orange County , having reviewed an Initial Stu dy of the Project and h avin g found that _ th ~ Project wil l not have a signi f icant effect on the environme nt , will consider the adoption of a Negative Declaration on February 22, 1979 , at 8:45 A .M. at the administrative offices of the Orange Cou nty Transit District, 11222'Acac ia Parkway , Garden Grove , Ca l ifornia . If you have any questions or desire additional i nformation, p l ease cal l (714) 540-29 10. M. Reid Engineer ··--... 3rd DRAFT 2/12/7tJ • AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA THIS AGREEMENT, is made in Fountain Valley, California, on the __ day of -----' 1979, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA (each hereinafter referred to collectively as "Districts"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing under the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act (Section 4700 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code); and . WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in the collection, transporting and dis- posal of sewage and industrial wastes originating with the County of Orange; and . WHEREAS, each District jointly owns an undivided and different interest in the various facilities and properties used for the treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial wastes, including the jointly owned trunk sewers, r eal property, improve- men ts to rea l property, treatment plants a nd outfalls. WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory within the County of Orange and owns certain trunkline and interceptor sewage facilities independent of each other District; and WHEREAS, the territory of all Districts, together constitute a contiguous terri- tory; and WHEREAS, by agreement entitled "Joint Ownership, Operation a nd Construction Agreement", dated July 1, 1970, Districts maintain a single joint administrative organ- ization which operates and administer s all of the affairs of each District; and 1 WHEREAS, each District has adopted a Master Plan of Trunk Sewer s which P l a n in cludes provisio n for construction of aJJ e lements thereto based on projected l and developme nt as well as fin ancial capabili ty of the District; and WHEREAS, ce rta in Districts pre se ntly h ave outstanding bonded ind ebt edness, which obli gat ions are r etired by the l evy of taxes on the real properties within the Di strict ; a nd WHEREAS , by reason of differing status of development and land uses, each District has d i fferent requirements for fundin g its oper ations; and WHEREAS, many adm inistr ati ve benefits can be derived from a consolidation of all Distr icts i nto a s in g le County Sanitation Dist r ict, including a reduction of over- all costs; and WHEREAS, the Districts desire to e nter this agr eement on a basis of each exis- ting D istrict r eceiving ce rtain g uaran tees that Maste r Planned Trunk Sewer s located within the existing territorial jurisdictio n of each District, wi ll i n fact be constructed in accordance w i t h the cur rent time schedule s e t forth in the Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Districts in making this agreement, wish to provide for the most equitable contribution to t he Consolidated Dis trict which is possible by each District, so as to insure adequate fund ing fo r full secondary t r eatment through constructi on of expanded facilities at the treatment wo r ks, if required by Jaw; and WHEREAS, t he Districts i n entering into this agreement, w i sh to establi sh a priority lis t of construction scheduling for planned t r unk sewer lin es which wi ll be r e quired to be funded out of the general construction funds of the Consolidated Dis- t ricts; a nd WHE REAS, the Districts, by entering into th i s agreement, desire to develop a schedul e o f u niform connection charges and user fees throughout t he Consolidated District. 2 1st step : petition LAFC Approval of Master Plan Sewers oint) Schedules for construction of Master Plan Trunk Sewers in each District "Veto" power of local agency re change jn 1edule NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements set forth hereinafter, it is agreed as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incor- porated herein as operative provisions. 2. That the Di s tricts will petition the County of Orange, Local Agency Formation Commiss ion, pursuant to the District Reorganization Act (California Government Code Sections 56000 et seg.), for consolidation into one County Sanitation District, whose territory will include all of the territory now contained within their respective territorial boundaries. 3. The consolidation di s trict, hereinafter called --------------------------~ will be known as ----------------------------------------~ 4. The Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and Facilities for the Consolidated Districts, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein, is hereby approved and adopted. No amendment shall be made thereto without .first holding a public hearing thereon after published and w ritten notice to each member agency advising of such hearing. Upon a conclusion of such hearing, any amendment must be approved by a 2/3 vote of all Directors. 5. The signatories hereto agree that in orde r to equitably utilize the revenues of the Districts , and to insure the construction of Master Planned Facilities within the territorial limits of the member agencies, substantially in accord with the Master Plan schedule of the predecessor Districts, the facilities listed on Schedules 1, 2 and 3 of Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein, shall be constructed by the Consolidated District in the following sequential order: First: Those facilities set forth on Schedule B-1; Second: Those facilities set forth on Schedule B-2; Th i rd: Those facilities set forth on Schedule B-3. Any proposed modif ication or change to said schedules which results in any facility being placed lower in priority of construc- tion shall require the approval by the Director(s ) representing the member agency or agencies in which said facility to be delayed in construction, is to be constructed. 3 .. Sch B-1 ~ ~uaranteed )nstruct 1 of\ : '-f5r esent fun ds to 'be used fo r cons truction within existing Di st. territo ry Thi s Section gu arantees th e integrity of indiv . Dist. reserves for us e within Dist. ,,. 'c"!e c. 12 Consolidated Fu nd will cover any shortfall in construct. cost. Sche d. B-2 : g ua ranteed const ruc t ion within 5 y r s. 6. Th e signatories hereto agree th at the trunk line sewe r s, shown on Schedule B-1, const i t ute facilities which were master pla nned by the individual p r edecesso r districts and in fac t are f ull y funded as a resul t of re serves on deposi t by the individual Di s trict as o f the date of this ag r eement. In r ecog nition the reof, said funded amounts as tra n sferr ed into th e Con so lidated District a ccounts, shall be used exclus ivel y fo r the purpose of construction of sai d Jin es. It is agr eed that i f the actual cost of con- s tructi on of any of said lines set forth on Schedule B-1 exceeds the amou nt budgeted therefor a nd for which r eserves a r e on deposit, that said excess will be funded by the r emaining reserves credited to said District in the capital outlay fund of the con- solidated distr ict. In th e event the actual cost of cons t ruction i s l ess than the amount bud geted for said proj ect, the excess funds will remain in the capital outlay const rue- tion fund of the Consolidated District fo r t he credit of o t her projects withi n the ter ri- tory of said former individual Di strict a nd as li sted on Schedules B-1 and B-2 . If, after construction of a ll Maste r Planned Trunk Sewers liste d on Schedu l es B-1 and B-2, funds remain on deposit for the credit of the former District, said funds s hall be expenqed as set forth in Section 13 below . If capital outlay funds reserved by a former District are insufficient to meet the tota l cost of construction of all trunk sewer lines set forth on Schedules B-1 and B-2 the balance r equired shall be provided by the Consolidated District cpaital fund upon vote of a major i ty of the D irectors. 7. Th ose Master P lanned Trunk Lines, set forth on Schedule B-2, constitute facilities w hich have been p r ev i ously master planned by the individual predecessor District, but for wh i ch total funding was not av ailable as a r eserve on deposit as of the effecti ve date of this agreement. It is ag r eed that the constr uction of a ll facil - ities set fo r th on Schedule B-2 shall be in the s equential orde r shown thereon and shall not be modified except as set forth in Sect ion 5 above, provided, however, t hat said schedule shall t erminat e afte r a per iod of five year s from the effective date 4 Requires 2/3 vote to amend :hed. + vote f City where to be built. Sched. B-3 : t ent. const. sched. only . Modifiable by majority vote of alJ Directors. Constr. Sched. modif. due to grants. Const. Sch ed. modif. due to private funding. of this agreement. Thereafter, the Master Plan of Facilities Construction Schedule for those items set forth on Schedule B-2 may be amended by a majority vote of the Directors and without the express consent of the director representing the l ocal agen- cy in which said facility is to be located. 8. Those Master Planned Facilities set forth in Schedule B-3 constitute Master Planned Facilities for which neither funding nor construction schedules have been established as of the date of this agreement. The priority of construction for these facilities shall be in the sequential order shown thereon but said o rder may be modified at any time by a vote of the majority of the Directors. Funding for said facilities shalJ be from the capital outlay revolving fund of the Consolidated District. 9. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 7 and 8 above, any project set forth on Schedule B-2 or Schedule B-3, of this agreement can be approved fo r construe- tion in advance of the listed sequential priority b y a majority vote of the Directors, if the project is funded by an amount equal to at least 7 5% of the construction cost through grants provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or any other governmental agency outside of the Districts. I 0. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 7 and 8 above, any project set forth on Schedule B-2 or Schedule B-3 of this agreemment can be approved for con- struction in advance of the listed sequential priority by a majority vote of the Directors, if its construction is to be paid for by individual property owners, either as a condition of annexation to the Districts, or as a result of the execution of a reimbursement agreement by the property owner and the District. In such instance, the total cost of construction shalJ be advanced by the property owner, w ithout cost to the District. If the District approves the execution of a reimbursement agreement with the prop- erty owner, whe reby the District agrees t o repay the cost of construction to said owner, the terms and conditions of said agreement shall provide that reimburse ment 5 .. Priorit i es o f expending each Dist.'s c urre nt f un ds . shall b e mad e only a ft e r a ll othe r proj ect s se t forth on th e sequenti a l priority li st of Sche dule B-2 h a ve b een full y constru cted and paid fo r . Thereafter, th e r e imburse- ment amo unts s ha ll be pai d for out of the c a pital ou tlay r e vo lving fund of the consol- idate d district . 11. As of the da t e of this agr eement, a ll r ig ht, title and inte r est in the assets and liabilities of each District par ty hereto , s h a ll be t r a n sfe rred to the Co nsolida t ed District . A ll r eserves for construction a nd a ll bond rede mption mon i es on deposit in the name of or h e l d for t he credit of a Distri ct shall be t ransf e rr ed to the Consol- idated Dist ri ct's accounts for the b e nefit of properties withi n said fo r m e r D istrict . Specifi cally, s uch monies shall be expended in accordance wi th the provisio n s of para- graph 13 b e l ow . 12. All bond r ede mption funds presentl y h e l d in reser ve by a former Di str ict, sh a ll be t r a nsfer r ed to the Consolidated Dis trict's accounts and held in segregated fund accounts with the rig ht t o hold said f unds or portions the reof, u ntil such time as l egally r eq uired to retire any outstanding bonds by payment of both principal a n d interest . AH interest on these monies so he l d shall accr ue to the bene fit of said bond r ede mption fund. All monies r emaini ng after pay ment of a ll o ut stand i ng bo n ds shall be tr a ns ferred and expe nded in acco rd a n ce with t he provis i ons of Section 13 . 13. It is the inte nt of the part ies h ereto that each exi st ing predecessor District, s ig natory to t hi s agreeme n t, s ha ll have the r eserv e fu nds of said Di str ict wh ich ex i s t as of the date of t his ag r eement, togeth e r wi th any a nnex ation fees a nd connecti on charges r ecei ved during the fi r st five (5) years of this agreeme nt , set aside a n d obliga- t e d t o f und the fo llowing f inancial obligations in the orde r set for th. a) To pa y the current obligati o n of said Di strict fo r the cost of con st ru e- ting expanded t r eatment p lant faci lities as d esc ribed in the 11 6 Yea r P l a n Th rough 1983-84" (which does not incl ude a n y add ition a l secon- dary treatment faci lit ies beyond that existin g or unde r construction- based on obtain i ng a wa iver pursuant to Public Law 9 5-2 17) 6 ·• b) To pay all principal and interest necessary to for redemption of out- standing bonded indebtedness, if any. c) To pay for the cost of construction of Master Planned Trunk Sewers within the t erritory of said District, as set forth on Schedules B- l and B-2. Any remaining funds on deposit to the credit of said District after payme nt of all obligations set forth in 13(a)(b) and (c) above shall be refunded in equal amounts to each real property owner of record within the t e rritory of said District by means of a credit on the r eal property tax levy for the fi scal year following said order by the Board of Directors. In the event the District is legally barred from granting a tax. credit as reimburse- ment to the property owners as set forth above, then all remaining funds shall revert to the capital outlay fund of th.e Consolidated District for the construction of construc- tion of other capital projects within the Consolidated District. 14 .. Concurrently with the execution of this agreement, the Consolidated District shall form improve ment districts or similar legal plan for the purpose of providing the necessary identificatio n for retirement of outsta nd in g bonded indebtedness, which obligations have continued over from the predecessor sanitation district. 15. That certain proposed ordinance setting fo rth a uniform schedule of connec- tion charges and us e r fee charges for all properties within the consolidated district, attached hereto as Exhibit "C", and incorpora ted here in by reference, as though set forth at length, is hereby approved. 16. The Consolidated District is designated as the successor-in-interest to Sani- tation Di s tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 a nd 11, and each of them, for the purpose of suc- ceeding to all of the rig hts, duties and obligations of each of said dist r icts, with r espect to the enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding obligations, including bonds, other existing contracts and agreements . Additionally, each of the sig na tory 7 Districts hereto agrees to convey any and all rights, title and interest to the equip- ment, property, easements, rights-of-way and interests in real or personal property to the consolidated district for the benefit of said consolidated district. All funds of the consolidated district shall be conveyed to the Consolidated District. The Co nsol- idated District agrees to accept all conveyances from each individual District, and assume all obligations of each individual District. 17. This agreement shall be effective , 1979 or sixty (60) days ------ after approval by the Board of Directors of all seven (7) Districts, party hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and by authority of Resolution No. __ , dated __ _ 19_ of the Board of Directors of this District approving this agreement, we have executed this agreement this __ day of ______ , 1979. APPROVES AS TO FORM: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By -C=""""h-a~ir_m_a_n------------~ By-=-----------------~ Secretary Thomas L. Woodruff, Gene ral Couns el jm:D: 12:2/ 12/79 8 .. ORDINAN CE ESTABLISHNG UNIFORM CONNECTION CHARGES AND U SER FEES Thi s Ordinance is not ye t developed and will be done at the time of preparing the adoption of a R e ve nue Progr a m . EXHIBIT 11 C 11 : SCHEDULE B-1 Revision 1 Revision 2 1/24/79 1/26/79 Fully Funded Master Plan Sewers DISTRICT 1 Miscellaneous Projects DISTRICT 2 Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Ca nyon Orange Sub-Trunk Rive r Crossing Orchard & Richfield Interceptor Liability to Anaheim for South Santa Ana Rive r Interce ptor Distribution of Joint Wor ks SAWPA Equity Carbon Can y on Dam Interce ptor Olive Sub-Trunk Ri ver Crossing South Santa Ana Ri ver Interceptor Miscellaneous Projects DISTRICT 3 Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 3 Reimburse Other CSD's for Se al Beach Blvd. Pump Station Equity Orangethor pe Relief Trunk Reach 15 Westmin s ter Avenue Force Main Additional Pumps at Seal Beach Pump Station Knott Interceptor, Reach 8 Miscellaneous Projects DISTRICT 5 Replace Pump s at "A" St., 14th St. and Lido Pump Station Lining of Coast Highway Force Main Master Plan Update and NIWA Project Replace Portion of Bay s ide Drive Sewer Jamboree Drive Relief Sys tem New Santa Ana Riv e r Crossing Bay Bridge Pump Station Additions Lining of Coa s t Hi ghway Force Main Replace Pumps at Roc ky Point Reimbursem e nt Agr eeme nts Payable Miscellaneo us Projects Total Funds Required 422,000 422,000 5,000 30,000 820,000 91'908 1, 138 ,000 1,000,000 300,000 125,000 600,000 4,109,908 3,400,000 85,400 80,000 1,600,000 275,000 2,000,000 400,000 7,840,400 7,000 150,000 33,000 250,000 1,000,000 220,000 350,000 257,000 13,000 159,689 375,000 2,814,689 Appropriated Funds On Hand (a) 422,000 422,000 5,000 30,000 820,000 91. 908 1,138,ooo 1,000,000 300,000 125,000 600,000 4, 109,908 3,400,000 85,400 80,000 1,600 ,000 275,000 2,000,000 400,000 7,840,400 7,000 150,000 33,000 250,000 1,000,000 220,000 350,000 257,000 13,000 159,689 375,000 2,814,689 Balance To Be Provided : SCHEDULE B-1 (Continued) DISTRICT 6 New Santa Ana River Crossing Lining of Coast High way Force Main Replace Pump at Rocky Point DISTRICT 7 Mi che 1 son Sub-Tru.nks Replace Pump at Navy Way Station Tustin-Orange, Reaches 17 & 18, and Hewes/Chapman DISTRICT 11 Ocean Avenue Trunk Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 1 and Portion of Reach 2 and Newland Stree t Intercepto r Coast Hi ghwa y Trunk , Port ion of Reh 2 Slater Pu mp Station Upgrade a nd New Force Main Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 3 Edwards Trunk Warn er Avenue Relief Sewer GRAND TOTAL Total Funds Required 80,000 143,000 9,000 232,000 200,000 10,000 253,831 463,831 50,000 4,000,000 1,400,000 400,000 850 ,000 600 ,000 230,000 1,530,000 23,412,828 Appropriated Funds On Hand (a) 80,000 143,000 9,000 232,000 200,000 10,000 253,831 463,831 50,000 4,000,000 1 '1100 '000 400,000 850,000 600,000 230,000 7,530,000 23,412,828 Balance To Be Provided (a) All projects on this schedule are fully funded by current accumulated construction reserves. -2- .. ·~ .... SCHEDULE B-2 Maste r P l an Facilit i es To Be Constructed During Next Five Yea r s With Current Funding and/or Future Revenues DIS TRICT 3 Or angethorpe Relief Trunk DISTR ICT 6 Misce ll aneous Projects DISTRICT 7 Tustin-Orange, Reaches 17 & 18 Tustin-Orange, Reaches 19 & 20 Miscellaneous Projects DISTR I CT 11 Go l de n West I nterceptor Wa r ner Avenue Sewer Purchnse .. Miscellaneous Projects GRAND TOTA L To ta l Funds Requ i red 2,275,000 17 5,000 302,847 365,000 630,000 1,297,847 309,000 250,000 375,000 934;000 4,681 ,847 (a ) Co nnection Fees collected past 3 years 1975-76 1976-77 1977 -78 $ 3. 1 mi 11 ion 3. 9 mi 11 ion 3. 6 mi 11 ion Appropriated Funds On Hand 1,025,780 86,582 347,604 3~7,604 323,667 323;667 1,783,633 Revision 1 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 Balance To Be Provided (a) Priority 1,249,220 88,4 18 302,847 365,000 282 '396 950 ,243 309 ,000 250,000 51 ,333 610,333 2,898,214 2 (b) 2 (b) 3 4 (c) (b) Scheduling dependent upon City of Orange needs in future annexations to city . (c) May be de l eted after re-evaluation of Consol i dated Master Pl an requirements. '! SCHEDULE B-3 Facilities To Be Constructed From Future Revenues Total Funds Required DISTRICT 3 Ka tel la Relief Interceptor 200,000 Crescent Relief Trunk, Reach 14 258,000 Magnolia Interceptor, Reach 30 270,000 Lampson Interceptor, Reaches 11 and 12 410,000 1,138,000 DISTRICT 6 Gisler Trunk Re 1 i ef Sewer 1,000,000 DISTRICT 7 South Irvine Lift Station 250,000 South Irvine Sub-Trunk 200,000 i.50,000 DISTRICT 11 Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 4 501,000 Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 5 1,000,000 Edwards Trunk, Reach 1 900,000 Coast Highwa y Trunk, Reach 6 1 ,489 ,000 McFadden Avenue Relief Trunk 124,000 Edinger Avenue Interceptor 100,000 Heil Avenue Relief Sewer 156,000 Graham Street Sewer Purchase 104,ooo Springdale Trunk Sewer 670,000 5,044 ,ooo GRAND TOTAL 7,632,000 (a) Connection fees collected past 3 years: 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 $ 3 . 1 mi 11 ion 3. 9 mi 11 ion 3. 6 mi 11 ion Appropriated Funds On Hand -o- -o- -o- -o- -o- (b) Scheduling dependent upon needs in Balsa Chica area Revision 1 Revision 2 Balance To Be Provided (a) 200,000 258,000 270,000 410,000 1,138,ooo 1,000,000 250,000 200,000 450,000 501 ,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,489,000 124,000 100,000 156,000 104,000 670,000 5,044,ooo 7,632,000 (c) May be deleted after re-e valuation of Con s olidati o n Master Plan 1/24/79 1/26/79 Priority 7 (c) 7 (c) 7 (c) 7 (c) 2 2 3 5 (b) 6 (d) 7 (b) 8 (c) (d ) 8 (c) (d ) 8 (c) (d ) 9 (c) (d) 4 (d) Conn e cts to Coast Hwy trun k, must be scheduled after Reach 5 of Coast Hwy trunk built Revision 1 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 COUN TY SANITATION DISTRIC TS 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 1. Treatment Plant Expansion (a) 2. Less Grant Funding 3. Net Treatment Plant Local Fundi ng Re qu ired (6 -yea r s 78/79- 83/84) 4. Outstanding Bonds (Principal) 5. Sch e dule B-1 Master Plan Facilities (5 -years 73/79 -82/83) 6. Less Grant Funding 7. Total Fundin~ Requi r emen ts 8. Cas h on Hand 9. Funds (Avai l ab l e) or Requir ed 10. Schedu le B-2 Mast e r Pl a n Faci 1 i ties (Afte r 82/83) 11. Funds (Available) o r Required 12 . Schedu 1 e B-3 Fae i I i t I es 13. Funds (Available) or Required 14. Bond Interest (c) Dist . /1 1 10,442,000 (5, 135,000) 5,307,000 840,000 422,000 6,569,000 SUMMARY OF FUNDS AVAILAB LE AND ADDITIONAL FUN DI NG REQUIR ED CONSO LID ATION BUDGE T REVIEW DI st. #2 Di st. #3 34,728 ,0DO 38,039,000 (17 ,078,000) (18,707 ,000) 17,650 ,000 19 ,3 32 ,000 3,91i5,000 5,951i,OOO 4. 109 ,908 7,840,400 25,701i,908 33, 126,400 Di st. #5 8,022,000 (3 ,945,000) 4 ,077,000 276,000 2,814,639 7, 167 ,689 (7,22 6,042) (35,192 ,435) (34,333,238) (7,659,998) (65 7 ,042) (9 ,4 87 ,527) (l ,206,838) (657,042) (657,042) 103,688 (553,354) 2,2 75,000 (9,487,527) 1,068 ,162 1,138,000 (9,487,527) 2,206,162 468,469 75 4 ,44 4 (9,0 19,058) 2,960 ,606 ( 492 . 309) (492 ,309) (492,309) 44,21i8 (448 ,061) Dist. #6 6,749,000 (3,319,000) 3 ,430,000 262,000 232 ,000 3 ,921i ,OOO Dist. #7 9 ,909 ,00 0 (4 ,8 73 ,000) 5,036,000 Di st. #11 7 ,871,000 (3 ,871 ,000) li ,000 ,000 6 ,11 0,200-(b) 848,ooo 463,831 7 ,530 ,000 (3,480,000) 11 ,6 10,031 8 ,898,000 (4,018,692) (12,259,020) (9,247,717) (94,692) 175,000 80,308 1 ,000,000 1,080,308 35 ,734 1,11 6 ,042 (648 ,989) 1 ,297 ,847 648,858 450,000 1 ,098 ,858 1 ,849,850 2,948 ,7 08 (349' 717) 934,000 581i ,283 5,044,000 5,628 ,283 14 8,800 5,777 ,083 (a) Assumes wa i ve r of secondary t reatment (b) Inc ludes JOS Li abil ity (c) It i s anticipated that bond Interest payments can be made from inve stment interest earnings on the bond principa l. TOT AL 115,760 ,000 (56 ,928,000) 58,832,000 18,235,200 23,412,828 (3 ,480 ,000) 97,000,028 (109,93 7,142 ) (12,937,114) 4 ,681 ,847 (8 ,255 ,267) 7,632,000 (623 ,267) 3,405,233 2 ,781 ,966 TREATMENT PLANT-( I ) Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/84 Appropriat i on for Trmt. Pl ant Fac ilities to Comp l y 1<i th State & Federa l Regs . App ropriat i on for Non-Grant Funded Faciliti es TOTAL PLANT EXPANS ION MASTER PL AN OF TRUNK SEWERS & OTllER CAP ITAL FUND I TEMS -(2) Appropriation f or District Faci l ities TOTAL MASTER PLAN BONDED OES T 1951 ISSUE: Outst andi ng Bonds @ 6/30/78 I nterest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED I ND EBTEDNESS GRAND TO TAL COUNTY SAN I TATION DI STR ICT NO. l OF ORANG E COUN TY CONSOL I DA TI ON BUDGET REVIEW (1) TO TAL FUN DS REQUIRED A 10,442 ,000 10 ,442 ,000 422 '000 -(3) 422 ,DOO 840,000 103 ,688 943 ,688 11 ,807 ,688 (2) 1978-79 BUDGET PPROPR I AT ION (2 ,820 ,627) (2 ,332 ,2 16)} (l ,832 ,455) (6,985,298) (72 ,393) (72 '393) (70,000) ( 19' 163) (79,188 ) ( 168' 35 1) (7,226,042) (3) BALANCE TO BE PRO\/ I OED OR (llPPROPR lllTEO ) 7 ,621 .373 (4,164,67 1) 3,456,702 31.9,607 349,607 770 ,000 84,525 (79, 188 ) 775,337 4 . 581 ,646 (I) I ES T I MATED CONSTRUCT I ON GRANTS (5. 135,000) (5 , 135 ,ooo) (5. 135 ,000) (l} 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to de l e te 100 MGO secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver) (5) ALLOCAT I DN OF APPROPR IATI ONS ANO RESERVES (2,486,373) 3,526 ,792 1,040 ,1119 (349 '607) (349 ,607) (770,000) 79 , 188 (690,812) Revisi on l 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) UNAPPROPRIA TED SAL 1\VA I Li\OL[) OR ADD I TIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED (4) (637 ,879) (637 ,879) 84 ,525 84,525 ( 55 3.351-0 Purchase and sa l e of joint works equ ity ha s been o mitted . Thi s i tem i s fu l ly f unde d for 197 8-79 and would be d i scontinued in future years i f consolidat i ons o c c u rs . (2) Th e follow i ng 1978-79 capita l budget items have been om i tted f rom the above for t he r easons set f ort h. (a) IC R payment to Federal Governme nt -$9 ,000: This item is funded ann uall y from industria l user charges. (b) Capita l funds "opera ting costs -56,100 : Expenses are nomina l and fun ded from annual reve nues. (c) Transfer to Operat i ng Fund -SSl12,5 56 : To cover Prop . 13 sho rtfall. Ant ici pate a simi l ar transfer in 1979-80, part i al ly offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pendi ng determination re user charges. (3) Mi scellaneous Projects (11 ) If full secondar y treatme nt requ ireme nt i s not waived , an add i tional Sl,7 1'1 ,000 in l ocal fund s will be requi r ed. COUUTY SAN I TATION DI STR I CT NO. 2 OF ORA NG E CO UN TY CON SO LI DATI ON BUDGET REVIEW Rev I s Ion I /24/79 Rev Is I on I /26/79 (6) (I ) TOTAL FU NDS REQU I RED (2) (3) (4) (5) (UNAPPROPRIA TED BAL 1978-79 BALANCE TO EST I MATED ALLO CA TI ON AVA ILAB LE) OR BUDGET OE PROV I DED CON STRUC TION OF APPRO PR IATI ONS ADD I TIONAL FUNDING TREATMENT PLANT-(!) Plant Ex pans i on 1978/79 -1983/84 Approp riati on fo r Trmt. Plant Facilities to Co mp ly 1•ith State & Federa l Regs . Appropriation fo r Non -Grant Fund ed Treatment Pl a "t Facilit i es TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTE R PL MI TR UNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEMS-(2) Sle epy Holl ow-Carbon Can yon Liability to Anahe i m for So. S/A River Trunk Orange Su b-Trunk River Cross ing Distribution of Joint Works SAWPA Equity Or chard and Richf i e ld Inte rcept o r Appropriation fo r District l mp r oven~nts SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Carbon Cany on Dam I nterceptor S l eepy Ho llow-Carbon Canyon Project Ol i ve Sub -Trunk River Crossing South Santa Ana River Inte rceptor Appropriation for District Faciliti es and Impro vements BONDED DEBT 1951 I ssue: SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL MASTER PLAN Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 In t eres t Authorized Gene ral Reserve 1958 I ssue: Bond s Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authori zed Genera l Re serve TOTAL BONDED INDE BTE DNESS GRAND TOTAL 34,728,000 34,728,000 5,000 91,908 30,000 I , 138,000 820,000 2,084,908 1,000 ,D00-(4) 300,000 125,000 600. 000-(3) 2,025,000 4,109,908 495,0DO 54,844 549,844 3,450 ,000 413 ,625 3,863,625 43,251,377 APPROPRIAT I ON (9 ,253 , 146 ) (7. 768 ,000) } (6. 189 ,000) (23,210,146) (5,000) (46 ,000) (30,000) (1 , 138 ,000) (820 ,000) (2 ,341 ,500) (4,)80,500) -o- -o- (3 00 ,000) ( 125 ,000) (6 .363 ,401) (6,788,401) (11 , 168,901) I - (45,000) (I 1, 194) (50 ,)44) (106 ,538) (350,000) (104 ,250) (252 ,600) (706 ,850) (8 1),)88) (35, 192,435) OR (APPROP RIATE D) GRANTS ANO RESERVES REQUIRED 25,474 ,854 ( 17 ,078 ,000) (8,396,854) ( 13 .957 ,000) 8,396,854 (5' 560. 14 6) 11,517 ,854 (17 ,078,000) -o-(5,560, 146) 45,908 (45 ,908 ) (2 ,)Ill ,500) 2 . 34 1 • 500 (2 ,295 ' 592 ) 2 ,2 95 ,592 1,000 ,000 (I ,000 ,000) (5. 763 ,401) I ,95 1,464 (J,811,9l7) (11,763,401) 95 1,464 ( 3 ,811 • 937) (7,058 .99 3) 3 ,247,056 (J,8 11,937) 450,000 (450,000) 43 ,650 4),650 (50,344) 50,)44 44),306 (399,656) I 43,650 3, 100 ,000 (3. 100 ,00 0) 309,375 309,375 (252 ,600) 252 ,600 3,156 ,775 (l,847 ,400) 309,3 75 3.600,081 (3,247,056) 353 ,025 8,058 ,942 (17,078 ,000 ) -o-(9 ,019,058) (1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 MGD seconda ry treatmen t (assume receipt of waiver). Pur chase and sale of joint •1orks equity has been omitted. This item is ful l y funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years i f con so 1i daLion oc curs . (2) The following 1978 -79 capital budget items have bee n omitted from the above for the reas ons set forth . (a) ICR paymen t to Federa l Government -S30,000: This item i s funded annua l ly from indust r ia l user cha r ges. (b) Capitttl funds "operating costs" -$82,100: Ex penses a r c nom i nal and funded from annua l revenues . (c) Tr ansfer to Op e rating Fund -SI ,689 ,609: To cover Prop . 13 •hortfal I. An li c i pate asimilar transfer i n 19 79 -80 , par ti a l l y o ffs et by budget ary savings and add itiona l revenue, pend i ng determination re user charges . (d) S l eepy ll o l l ow-Carbon Ca nyon Projec t -$200,000: Project has been cance l l ed. (3) Mi sce ll aneous Projects. (4) Revi s ed cost estimate . (5) If full secondary treatment Is not wa i ved , an additiona l $5,700,000 In l oca l funds will be required. (5) TREATMEN T PLANT -(1) Pl ant Expans ion 1978/79 -1983/84 App ro pr i ation for Trmt. Pl an t Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Hon-G rant Funded Faci l ities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSIOtl MASTER PLAN TRUtlK SEllERS & OTHER CAP ITAL FUND ITEMS -(2) Knott Interceptor -Po r tion o f Reach Reimburse other CSD's for Sea l Beach Blvd. Pump Station Equity Or angethorpe Relief Trunk , Reach IS Westminster Avenue Force Main Appropriation for District Imp rovements SUB -T OTAL ACO FUUD Addit i ona l Pu mps at Seal Beach P.S. Knott Interceptor -Reach 8 Ka r e ll a Relief Interceptor Orangethorpe Relief Trunk -Reaches 16 & 16A Cr escent Relief Trunk, Reach 14 Magno l ia I ntercept or , Reach JO ' ~son Intercep t or , Reaches II & 12 1p riation f or District Imp rovements SUB -TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL MASTER PLAtl BONDED DEBT -1951 & 1958 I ssues: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/J0/78 Interest Autho r ized Genera l Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL COUNTY SAtllTA TI ON DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE CO UNTY COtlSOLI DAT I OH BUDG ET REVI Ell (I ) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED 38 ,039,DOO 38 ,039 ,000 3,400,000 85,400 80,000 1 ,600,000 -o- s . 165 ,400 275,000-(4) 2 ,000 ,000 20 0 ,000 2 ,275 ,000 258,000 270 ,000 410,000 400 ,000-(3) 6 ,088,000 11'253 '400 S ,954 ,ooo 754,444 (2) 1978-79 BUDGET APPROPR IAT ION (10 ,26 1 ,62 1) (8,6 14,000)} (6 ,863 ,000) (25,738,621) (3 ,400 ,000) (85, 400) (80,000) (1 ,600,000) (67 ,823) (5,233,223) (2,000 ,000) (184 ,065) (2 ,184,065) (7,417,288) (535,000) (18 1 ,058 ) (461 ,271) (I, 177 ,329 ) (34 ,333 '238) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (APPRO PRIATE D) 27,777 ,379 (IS ,477 ,000) 12,300 ,379 (67,823) (67 ,823) 275 ,000 200 ,000 2,275 ,000 258 ,000 270,000 4 10 ,000 215 ,935 3,903,935 3,836,11 2 S,419,000 573 ,386 (461 ,271) 5 ,531, 11 S 2 1 ,667 ,606 (4) EST I HATED CONSTRUCT I Otl GRANTS (18,707,000) (18,707 ,000) ( 18 '707 ,000) (I ) 1978-79 Bud get 5-year cash f l ow adjusted to de l ete 100 HGO seconda r y treatment (assume recei p t of waiver). Rev i sion I 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (5) ALLOCATION OF APPROPR IAT I ONS AllD RESE RVES (9,070 ,379) 15,477,000 6,406,62 1 67,823 67,823 (275,000) (l ,025,780) (21s'935) (1 ,516,715) (1 ,448,892) (S ,419,000) 461 ,271 (4 ,957' 729) (6) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL AVAILABLE) OR ADD IT I ONAL Furm I NG REQUIRED (S) 200,000 l ,24 9 ,220 258 ,000 270 ,000 410,000 2,387,220 2 ,387,220 573 ,386 573 .386 2,960,606 Purchase and sa l e of joint v1orks equ ity has been om itt ed . Thi s i t em is fu ll y funded for 1978 -79 and wou l d be discontinued in future years i f consoli dation occurs. (2) The f ol l 01•in9 1978-79 capita l budget it ems have been om itted from the above For the rea sons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Fede ral Government -533,000: Thi s Item i s funded annua ll y from i ndustrial user charges. (b) Capit.,I fund s "operating costs" -581t ,4 00: Expenses ure nominal and funded from annual revenues . (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -51 ,477 ,461: To cover Prop. 13 s ho rtfall. Anticipate a simi lar t ransfer in 19 79-80 , partia l l y offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determi nation re user charges. (3) Miscellaneous Projects. (4) Revised Cost Estimate. (S) I f ful l secondary treatment is not waived, an additiona l 56,243,000 in l oca l funds will be required . TREATMENT PLANT·(l) Plant Expansion Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS-(2) Replace Pumps at "A" St., 14th St., & lido P.S. Lining of Coast Hwy. Force Hain Appropriation for District Improvements Master Plan Update & NIWA Project SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Replace Portion of Bayside Drive Sewer Jamboree Drive Relief System New Santa Ana River Crossing Bay Bridge P.S. Additions Lining of Coast Hwy. F/H Replace Pumps at Rocky Point Reimbursement Agreements Payable Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL HASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT: 1951 Issue Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW (I) TOTAL FUNDS ~ 8,022,000 8,022,000 7,000 150,000 -0- 33, ooo 190,000 250,000-(4) 1,000,000-(4) 220,000-(4) 350,000-(li) 257,000-(li) 13,000 159,689 375,000-(3) 2,624,689 2,814,689 276,000 44,248 320,248 II, 156,937 (2) 1978-79 BUOGET APPROPRIATION (2' 122 ,452) (I, 782 ,000) (1,420,000) (5,324,452) (7 ,000) (150,000) (882,852) (33 ,ODO) (I ,072 ,852) (50,000) (500,000) (13 ,000) ( 16,667) (632, 192) (1,211,859) (2 ,28li. 711) (20,000) (7 ,315) (23,520) (50,835) (7 ,659,998) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (APPROPRIATED) 5,899,548 (3,202,000) 2,697,Sli8 (882,852) (882,852) 200,000 500,000 220,000 350,000 257,000 143,022 (257' 192) 1,412,830 529,978 256,000 36,933 (23,520) 269,413 3,496,939 (4) EST I HATED CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (3,945,000) (3,9li5,000) (3,945,000) (1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Revision I 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) (5) UNAPPROPRIATED BAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING ANO RESERVES REQUIRED (I ,954,5'i8) 2,717,006 (484,994) 762,li58 (484 ,994) 882,852 882,852 (200,000) (500,000) (220,000) (350,000) (257 ,000) (143,022) 257, 192 (1,1t12,830) (529,978) (256,000) 36,933 23,520 (232,480) 36,933 (448,061) Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$7,000: This item Is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$9,400: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$330,738: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (d) Transfer ACO to FR $50,000: Inter-fund transfer cancels out. (3) Hiscellaneous Projects. (4) Revised Cost Estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment requirement is not waived, an additional $1,317,000 In local funds will be required. .. r TREATMENT PLANT-(1) Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/8li Appropriation for Tnnt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS-(2) (ACO FUND) New Santa Ana River Crossing lining of Coast H\-1y F/H Gisler Trunk Relief Sewer Replace Pumps at Rocky Point Appropriation for District Improvements TOTAL KASTER PLAN ~ONDED DEBT -1951 Issue Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL \._.,I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW (1) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED A 6,749,000 6,749,000 80,000-(li) 143,000-(4) 1,000,000 9,000 175,000-(3) 1,407.000 262.000 35.734 297,734 (2) 1978-79 BUDGET PPROPRIATION (1.812.152) (I, 126,442) (8811,663) (3,823,227) (50,000) (9,000) (7li,503) (133,503) (25,000) (8,110) (28,852) (61,962) (4 ,018 ,692) (3) BALANCE TO BE PROVIDED OR (APPROPRIATED) li,936,81t8 (2 .011,075) 2,925,773 80,000 93,000 1,000,000 100,497 1,273,497 237,000 27,624 (28,852) 235,772 4,435,042 (Ii) EST I HJ\ TEO CONSTRUCTION GRANTS (3,319,000) (3 ,319,000) (3,319,000) Revision 1 Revision 2 ALLJ~lnoN OF APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES (1 • 617 • 848) 2,011.075 393,227 \80,000\ 93,000 (12 ,079) (185,079) (237 ,000) 28,852 (208. Jl18) 1/24/79 J/26/79 (6) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL AVAILABLE) OR ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED (5) 1,000,000 88,418 l,088,lil8 27,624 27,624 1, 116,042 (1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This Item ls fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The fol lowing 1978-79 capital budget Items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$6,000: This Item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$3,800: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$299,801: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (3) Hiscel laneous Projects. (4) Revised Cost Estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment requirement Is not waived, an additional $1,108,000 in local funds will be required. J COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICT NO. 7 or ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW Revlslun I Revision 2 1/24/79 1/26/79 (I) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED (2) (3) (4) 6) (5) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL 1978-79 BALANCE TO ESTIMATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR -....,_; DUOGET BE PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING TREATMENT PLANT-(1) Plant Expansion Appropriation for Trmt. Facllltles to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS-(2) Unappropriated Reserve SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND Tustin-Orange 17, 18 & Hewes/Chapman Tustin-Orange 17, 18 Tustin-Orange, 19, 20 Michelson Sub-Trunk South Irvine Lift Station South Irvine Sub-Trunk Replace Pu~ps at Navy Way Station Appropriation for District Improvements Unappropriated Reserve SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL MASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT 1951 Issue: · •ds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 , •rest ~orlzed General Reserve 1962 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve 1970 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BONDED DEBT LIABILITY FOR JOS TOTAL JOS GRAND TOTAL 9,909,000 9,909,000 253,831-(4) 302,8i.1-m 365,000-(4) 200,000-(4) 250,000-(4) 200,000-(4) 10,000 630,000-(3) 2,211,678 2,211,678 150,000 18,280 168,280 2,41fO,OOO 624,370 ),06fi,370 3,500,000 1,207,200 4,707,200 7,939,850 20,200 20,200 20,080,728 APPROPR I A Tl ON (2,622,035) (2,201,000) J ( 1. 754 ,000) (6,577 ,035) (2,031,9l'i) (2,031,914) (liOS,456) I (li08 ,456) (253,331) ( 150,000) (10,000) I (920,000) I (779,549) (2, 113 ,380) (4,553,750) (13 ,000) (3,693) (lli,765) (31,458) (130,000) (86,41io) (77' 134) {293,574) (225,000) (211,252) (352 ,251) . (788,503) (l, 113,535) (14,700) , I (14, 700) I (12,259,020) OR (ArrROPRIATED) GRANTS AND RESEtl.VES REQUIRED 7,286,965 (4,873,000) (2,413,965) (3.955,000) 3,955,000 3,331,965 (4,873,000) 1,541,035 (2,0JI ,914) 2,031,911f (2,031,914) 2,031,914 (li08,li56) 408,456 (408,456) 4o8,li56 302,8li7 302,847-(6) 365,000 365,000-(6) 50,000 (50,000) 250,000 250,000 200,000 200,000 (290,0:>0) 572,396 282,396 (779,549) 779,5'i9 98,298 1,301,945 1,li00,243 (2,342,072) 3,742,315 1,400,243 137,000 (137,000) l'i,587 14,587 ( 14 '765) lli,765 136,822 (122,235) 14,587 2,310,000 (2,310,000) 537.930 537,930 (77,13'1) 77,13lf 2,770,796 (2,232,866) 537.930 3,275,000 (3 ,275. 000) 995.948 995,948 (352,251) 352,251 3,918,697 (2,922,749) 995,948 6,826,315 (5,277 ,850) 1,548,465 5,500 (5,500) 5,500 (5,500) 7,821,708 (4 ,87.3 ,000) 2,948,708 (I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Purchase and sale of joint ~1orks equity has been omitted. This Item ls fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years If consolidation occurs. (2) The following 1978-79 capital budget Items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$8,000: This Item Is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Caplt<il funds "operating costs11 -$28,000: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating f'und • $400,535: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. (d) Transfer ACO to f'O $5,518: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue. ~Miscellaneous projects. (4) Revised cost estimate. (5) If full secondary treatment requirement is not waived an additional$ 1,626,000 in local funds will be required, (6) To serve users presently outside the District. To be paid for from annexation and connection fees. (5) .J ',. .I .• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. II OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW Revision 1 1/24/79 Revision 2 1/26/79 (6) ( 1) TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED (2) (3) (4) (5) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL 1978-79 BALANCE TO ESTIMATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR BUDGET BE PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING TREATMENT PLANT -(1) Plant Expansion Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to Comply with State & Federal Regs. Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND ITEHS -(2) Ocean Avenue Trunk Coast Highway Trunk, Reach I and Portion of Reach 2 and Newland St. Interceptor Coast Highway Trunk, Portion of Reach 2 Warner Ave. Relief Sewer Appropriation for District Improvements SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND Slater Pump Station Upgrade and New Foree Hain Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 3 Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach li Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 5 Edwards Trunk, Reach 1 Golden West Interceptor Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 6 Edwards Trunk, Reaches 2 & Warner Ave. Sewer Purchase Mcfadden Ave. Relief Sewer Edinger Ave. Interceptor Hell Ave. Relief Sewer Graham St. Sewer Purchase ~--lngdale Trunk Sewer SUB-TOTAL FR FUND TOTAL HASTER PLAN BONDED DEBT 1951 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve 1958 Issue: Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78 Interest Authorized General Reserve TOTAL BOHDED DEBT GRAND TOTAL 7 ,871,000 7,871,000 50,000 4,000,000-(4) 1,400,000-(4) 230,000 375,000-(3) 6,055,000 400,000-(5) 850,000-(4) 501 ,000 1,000,000 900,000-(4) 309,000 1,489,000 600,000-(li) 250,000 12li,OOO 100,000 156,000 lOli,000 670,000 7,453,000 13,508,000 lli8,000 19,050 167,050 700,000 129,750 829,750 996,800 22,375,800 APPROPRIATION (2, 137,967) (1,795,000) (1,430,000) (5,362,967) (50,000) (2,201,000) (230,000) (I ,255,li99) (3,736,li99). -o- (3,736,499) I (12,000) (3,550) (13,700) (29,250) (50,000) (22 ,500) (46,501) ( 119,001) (148,251) I (9,247,717) I OR (APPROPRIATED) GRANTS ANO RESERVES REQUIRED 5,733,033 (3 ,871,000) (1,862,033) ~ (3,225,000) 3,225,000 2,508,033 (3,871,000) 1,362,967 -o- ~ 3,199,:>00 (3,480,000) '281,000 (880,li99) 931,832 51,333 2,318,501 (3,480,000) 1,212,832 51,333 400,000 (400,000) 850,000 (850,000) 501,000 501,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 900,000 900,000 309,000 309,000 1,489,000 1,489,000 600,000 (600,000) 250,000 250,000 124,000 124,ooo 100,000 100,000 156,000 156,000 104,000 104,000 670,000 670,000 7,453,000 (1,850,000) 5,603,000 9,771,501 (3,480,000) (637, 168) 5,654,333 136,000 ( 136,ooo) 15,500 15,500 (13,700) 13,700 137,800 (122 ,300) 15,500 650,000 (650,000) 107,250 107,250 (46,501) 710,749 (603,499) 107,250 848,549 (725,799) 122,750 13,128,083 (7,351,000) -0-5,777,083 ( 1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver). Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years If consolidation occurs. (2) (3) (I" The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth: (a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$7.000: This item is funded annually from industrial user charges. (b) Capllill funds "operating costs" -$25.ltOO: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues. (c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$li59,391i: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges. Miscellaneous Projects. ~evised cost estimate ~cw Project (6) If full secondary treatment requirement Is not w;ilvcd, an additional $1.292,000 In loc<1l funds will be required. (7) SWRCB has authorized the Districts to file an application for construction grant on this project. (6) RESOLUTIONS· A~JD· SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FEBRUARY 14; 1979 -7:30 P.M. : JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 16, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WAlmANTS ------ · 1353 ~354 44355 44356 44357 44358 44359 44360 44361 44362 44363 44364 44365 44366 44367 44368 44369 44370 44371 44372 44373 44374 44375 44376 . 44377 ·37g ~79 44380 44381 44382 44383 44384 44385 44386 44387 4438S 44389 44390 44391 44392 44393 44394 44395 ~4396 44397 44398 44399 44400 44401 44402 '03 """'04 "A-1" A-1 Mc-tnl Services Corp., Motor Pnrts $ A.S.C.E., Conference Registration Fee Allied Colloids, Chemicals Allied Supply Co., Valves Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Truck Parts Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Bank Amcricard, EPA Meeting Expense Banning Battery Co., Batteries Beckman Instruments, Electrical Supplies Bierly & Associates, Inc., Workers' Comp. Administration Bird Machine Co., Inc., freight Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Small Tools Blue Diamond Materials, Sand Mix Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage · H.B. Brown Co., Expansion Tank C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair CS Company, Plug Valves State of California, State Unemployment Taxes California Distributors, Small Tools Art Carr Transmission, Truck Repair Case Power & Equipment, Truck Parts Cc~tifietl Laboratories, Janitorial Supplies Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premiums College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orange, Pre-Employment Exams County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Workers'· Comp. Fund Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crane Packing Co., Crane Repair Charles P. Crowley Co., Engine Parts Daily Pilot, Legal Advertising Daniels Tire Service, Truck Parts Deco, Wire Supply Delaval-Barks<lale Controls Division, Freight George DeMatteo, Employee Mileage Dennis Printers, Inc., Printing Derby's Topsoil, Base Material Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supply The Duriron Co., Inc., Pump Parts Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Envirotech-Sparling, Electrical Repairs Federal Envelope Co., Office Supplies Fischer G Porter Co., Controls Fisher Scicnti fie Co., Chemicals Foremost Threaded Products, Small llardwnrc Cit)' of Fountain Valley, Water Uscngc The Foxboro Co., clcctricnl Supplies AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 636.00 100.00 18,720.00 1,406.83 168.02 592.78 102.63 125.04 157.97 1,800.00 62.35 58.41 338.66 13.00 24.90 40.90 815.00 80.70 7,873.41 41.93 257.20 63.83 259.00 1,023.74 30,204.00 578.66 749. 02 8.384.17 191. 54 2,626.85 256.08 1,084.00 185.16 267.08 9.77 124.19 192. 71 25.65 33·.s4 1,274.73 1,282.60 117. 02 153.78 98.48 3,000.00 224.33 173. 71 1,098.59 38.14 271. 54 828.78 115. 98 II A-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID .JANUARY 16, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 44405 44406 44407 44408 44409 44410 44411 44412 44413 44414 44415 44416 44417 44418 44419 44420 44421 44422 44423 44424 44425 44426 44427 44428 44429 44430 44431 44432 4443"3 44434 44435 44436 44437 44438 44439 44440 44441 44442 44443 44444 44445 44446 44447 44448 44449 44450 44451 44452 44453 44454 44455 441156 44457 II A-2" France Compressor Products, Compressor Parts City of Fullerton, Water Uscagc General Telephone Co., Telephone Goldcnwest Fcrtili zer Co., Sludge Hauling Gould, Inc.-Warrcn & Baily Division, Pump Parts Halprin Supply Co., Safety Equipment Hasty Alignment, Truck Repair Heat and Power Equipment Co., Electrical Supplies Hertz Car Leasing Division, Car Leasing Hertz Equipment Rental, Crane Rental David A. Hodgson, Employee Mileage Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co.,.Chemicals City of Huntington Beach, Water Useagc Ideal Sawdust Co., Inc., Sawdust Inland Empire Equipment Co., Truck Parts International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Useage Jensen Instrument Co., Electrical Supplies Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies James P. Kinney Co., Engine Parts Kicen-Li.ne Corp., Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Steel Supply L.A. Liquid Handling Systems, Pump Parts LBWS, Inc., Demurrage L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Lewco Electric Co., Truck Parts Lifecom-Safety Servi~e Supply, First Aid Supplies VOID Los Angeles Times, Classified Advertising McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Parts McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Small Tools. Morgan Equipment Co., Truck Parts E.B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers Nasco, Water Core Sampler Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals National Electrical Mfg~ Association, Electrical Supplies National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water Useage Sy Nielson Service, Lab Supplies Oakitc Products, Inc., Janitorial Supplies Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Lumber Orange County Farm Supply Co., Chemicals Orange County Water District, Water Useago Parkson, Inc., Pipe S~pplies Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Postmaster, Postngc · Power. Ddvos & Cha.in Co., Engine Parts Harold Pr.imrose Ice, Sampling Ico The Pryor G.iggcy Co., Freight Quality Building Supply, Sand Quality TypC\\lri ~er Maintcn~incc, Maintcn:rncc Contract AGENDA ITEM #3 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 2,317.14 46. 74 3,502.11 2,953.20 66.95 49.57 132.44 604.33 819.23 857.97 11. 25 2,079.92 1,370.52 479.54 103.88 10.66 3.58 704.37 382.45 454.56 128.23 166.89 265.08 427.60 154.23 1,237.06 -211. 90 126. 78' .oo 38 .. 06 430.39 232.43 81.04 221.54 74~16 1,439.78 25.00 49.15 59.15 10.80 180.00 550.35 695.52 84.27 4,674.00 58.30 37.84 500.00 55.00 15.90 49.85 667.80 102.Stl "A-2" u JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 16, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPEl~J\TING FUND WARRANTS \___/158 4'1459 44460 44461 44462 44463 44464 44465 44466 44467 44468 44469 44470 44471 44472 44473 44474 44475 44476 44477· 44478 44479 44480 . 44481 . ~482 ~483 44484 44485 44486 44487 44488 44489 44490 44491 44492 44493 II A-3" Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal Charles C. Regan Co., Pave Pump Station Relief Printing Co., Printing Service Research & Education Association, Publicatiori Robbins & Myers, Engine Parts Rubber-Tread, Inc., Safety Supplies Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Caustic Spill Deductible Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Scars, Roebuck and Co., Electrical Supplies See Optics, Safety Glasses Shepherd Machinery Co., Grader Repair South Orange Supply, Paint Supply Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas Southern Counties Oil Co., Fuel Southland Sweeping, Inc., Sweeper Rental Starow Steel, Steel Stock Super Chem Corp., Chemicals The Suppliers, Small Tools Thompson Lacquer Co., Paint Supplies Tru Supply Co., Sheetings Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck P~rts Un1on Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline United Parcel Service, Delivery Service Utilities Supply Co., Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Cylinder Rental Valley Cities Supply Co., Electrical Supplies John R. Waples, Odor ·Control Services Carl Warren & Co., Self Insurance Premium Western Salt Co., Lab Salt Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services Worthington Pump Corp., Pump Parts James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corp., Xerox Reproduction TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 115 .10 2,336.00 55.65 41.70 3,343.99 242.53 250.00 1,966.56 38.80 95.42 1,887.30 70.60 13,764.20 3,704.06 4,757.81 280.00 1,224.14 784.40 33.87 190.97 373.12 532.88 22.84 29.28 101.45 187.41 2,163.20 219.20 900.00 136.35 706. 77 5,218.10 724.01 9.60 4,189.23 164.30 $169,214.29 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID ~JANUARY 16, 1979 WAlmANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FlJNO WARRANTS 44342 44343 44344 44345 44346 44347 44348 44349 44350 44351 44352 "A-4" Arrow Truck Bodies ft Equipment, Flatbed V-170. $ Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Assignee of: Catalytic, Inc. Daily Pilot, Legal PW-069 Eastman, Inc., Office Files J.B. Gilbert & Associates, EIS/EIR Contract P2-23-2 C.H. Leavell & Co., Stop Notice Release Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., EDP Monitoring Rockwell International, Hydrant Meter Southern Calif. Coastal Water, Waiver Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing P2-23~5 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Spray Gun TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF ·, AGENDA ITEM·#8 -ALL DISTRICTS '• AMOUNT 1,529.74 2,451,060.00 63.27 2,509.27 1.460.55 2,008.63 19,447.71 384.47 12,462.00 373.16 551.20 $2,491,850.00 $2,661,064.29 "A-4" u : '-r<RRANT NO. INDIVJDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAIO .JANUARY 16, 1979 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED C/\P ITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 44336 Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co., Inspection 2-19 & 2-20 $ 1,507.10 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN. FAVOR OF 44337 T.W. Hawkins; Damage Settlement TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 Operating Fund •·. DISTRICT NO. 3 RRANT NO. \,,,.,/ ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 44338 44339 44340 Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-13-1, 3-20-3, and 3-20-4 Sladden Engineering, ·Test 3-20-3 Smith Emery Co., Test 3-13-1 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO Fund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 44341 County of Orange, Relocation of Sewer . ..·• TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 ·....._; "B" AGENDA ITEM #3 -ALL DISTRICTS $ 1,507.10 AMOUNT $ 1,355.00 $ 1,355.00 AMOUNT $25,105.00 175.00 2,040.00 $27,320.00 $28,675.00 AMOUNT $ 4,263.52 $4,263.52 "B" JOINT IHSTRlCTS CLAIMS PAilJ .J/\Nl.l/\RY 30, 1979 WArmANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WJ\(m/\NTS 44515 44516. 44517 44518 4'4519 44520 44521 44522 44523 44524 44525 44526 44527 44528 44529 44530 44531 44532 44533 445:54 44535 44536 44537 44538 44539 44540 44541 44542 44543 44544 44545 44546 44547 44548 44549 44550 44551 44552 44553 44554 44555 44556 44557 44558 44559 44560 44561 44562 44563 44564 44565 44566 44567 44568 II C-l" A-A & D Electronic Snles, Lab Supplies $ Air California, Air Fare American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts The Anchor Packing Co., Sheet Packing A11ixtcr Pruzan, Electrical Supplies Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Blades Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Membership Dues Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Associated Auto & Truck Parts Co., Truck Parts Banning Battery Co., Batteries Beckman Instruments, Electrical Supplies .L.W. Bemis Tractor & Implements, Guide Bar Benz Engineering, Inc., Valve Parts Berkley Controls, Inc., Electrical Supplies Bierly & Associates, Inc., Workers' Comp. Administration blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt Mix Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts Busin~ss Publisher, Inc., Publication CS Company, Valves Juan Cabrera, M.D., S.H.P. Payment California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair ~alif. Assoc. of Sanitation Agencies, Membership Dues Chevron.U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline City Wide Office Machinery, Adding Machine Repair Cla-Val Company, Engine Parts College Lumber Co. , Inc., Lumber Warren Collins Co., Inc., Windscreens Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Construction Scheduling Course, Construction Seminar Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental D.M.E., Inc., Exhaust Assembly Daniels Tite Service, Truck Tires Deco, Lantern DeGuclle & Sons Glass.Co., Glass Supply Dennys Air Conditioning & Heating, Electrical Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Federal Envelope Co., Envelopes Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Paint Supplies Filter Supply Co., Engine Parts Fischer & Porter Co., Plumbing Supplies Flo-Systems, Truck Parts Fountain Valley Camera, Film Processing The Foxboro Co., Registration City of Fullerton, Water Uscage GW Maintenance, Inc., Gas lloses General Electric Co., Electricnl Supplies General Telephone Co., Telephone Gcorg:in Pac.ific, Lumber .John Haslett Co., Filter Elements Haul -/H·rny Con~ci incrs, Trash Di spos:i l Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supply AGEnDA ITEM #8 -ALL DI STP.I CTS AMOUNT 95.40 65.00 138.54 967.64 330.64 185.50 3,375.00 270.16 813.86 359.73 75.10 34.72 1,541.53 52.20 900.00 68.22 98.58 12.00 228.20 156.00 169.70 1,610.00 1,297.86 74.68 135.04 508.56 345.98 249.36 525.00 1,643.00 69.00 422.79 1,725.00 91.63 502.96 273.52 25.14 120.00 48.23 185.12 55.63 438.93 1, 151. 64 188.42 154.61 1,200.00 38.36 68 .13 137.27 673.76 764. 64 1,227.91 495.00 2,331.61. "C-1" u u JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 30, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS '14569 ~4570 44571 · 44572 4~573 44574 44575 44576 44577 44578 44579 44580 44581 44582 44583 44584 44585 44586 44587 44588 44589 44590 44591 44592 . 44593 •4594 ~4595 44596 44597 44598 44599 44600 44601 44602 44603 44604 44605 44606 •44607 44608 44609 44610 44611 . 44612 . 44613 44614 44615 44616 44617 44618 "4619 ~620 44621 44622 44623 "C-2" llun<lley Company, Inc., Electrical Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water ICC Instrument Co., Motor Repair Instrumentation Specialties, Electrical Supplies International Business ~lachincs, Office Supplies International llarvestcr Co., Truck Parts Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pipe Supply Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Lance Speedometer Service, Speedometer Repair Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc., Cone Blocks Larsen-Hogue, Electrical Supplies Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lcwco Electric Co., Truck Parts McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Parts McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Wire Rope Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprint Reproduction Miller Machinery Co., Transformer Repair Morgan Equipment Co., Truck Parts City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corp., Paper Products . Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Electrical Supplies Pacific Telephone Co., Signal Circuits Pacific Wire Products of Calif., Small Hardware Pak West, Paint Supplies Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M.C. Patten Corp., Pressure Gauges Paul-Munroe Hydraulics, Inc., Valve Springs Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Pitney Bowes, Postage Meter Rental Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Printec Corp., Blueprint Supplies Process Four, Printing of District Maps Productool, Inc., Electrical Supplies The Pryor Giggey Co., Concrete Supply Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Metal Stock Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Sieves Shepherd Machinery Co., Truck Parts Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies Signal-Flash Co., Signal Flasher Rental South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas Southern Calif. Water Co., Water Southern Counties Oil Co., Diesel Fuel Sparkletts Dd nking \fatc:1· Corp., llottled Water Starow Steel, Steel Stock Super Chem Corp., Janitorial Suppllcs The Suppliers, Safety Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, Pctt)'.Cash TFJ Building M:itcrials, Valve Pnrts Taylor-Dunn, Electrical Supplies AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 460.03 10.13 25.00 110. 87 17.17 27.24 66.78 188.86 392.11 419.15 1,227.07 58.40 212.00 1,231.26 2~:~g 151.19 220.83 7.95 169.60 237.46 5.90 75.65 66.60 307.43 161.07 166.12 1,670.23 322.88 13.56 525.75 73.14 18.00 107.27 326.75 171. 87 420.81 1,177.74 79.96 92.05 3,022.90 933 .16 90.00 31.39 92,078.30 623.94 7.57 3,071.53 244.29 175.92 524.70 688.56 606.13 807.96 588.'14 "C-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 30, 1979 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPEn/\TING FUND WARRANTS 44624 44625 . 44626 44627 44628 44629 44630 44631 44632 ·44633 44634 44635 44636 44637 44638 44639 44640 "C-3" C.O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Travel Buffs, Air Pare Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J.G. Tucker li Son, Inc., Oxygen Supply United Industrial Supply, Inc., Thermometer United Parcel Service, Delivery Valley Cities Supply Co., Pipe Supply VWR Scientific, Lah Supplies Waukesha Engine Scrviccntcr, Engine Parts Wesco, Electrical Supplies West Chemical Products, Inc., Office Supplies VOID Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction George Yardley Associates, Water Gauges Donald Winn, CASA Conference Expense Frances Wood, Compensation & Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND .,. AGENDA ITE~ #8 -ALL DISTRICTS ., AMOUNT $ 164.07 u 114. 00 1,372. 00 229.27 53.00 16.60 1,094.57 214.80 232.22 258.97 66.55 .OD 145.33 1,655.92 156.14 100.00 395.60 $149,526.56 u "C-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 30, 1979 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY HEVOLVING FUND WARRANTS. 4506 ~4507 44508 44509 44510 44511 44512 44513 44514 "C-4" Associated of Los Angeles, Test Equipment $ Calingua, Inc., Contract J-6-lF John Carollo Engineers, P2-24 Design John Carollo Eng./ Greeley and Hansen, P2-23 Construction County of Orange, Lab Analysis I-IR McMastcr-Carr Supply Co., Air Hose Reel Peat, Marwick, ~litchell & Co., Revenue Program J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower Utilities Supply Co., Drill TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND & CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 688.33 18,420.30 34, 165. 72 14,674.89 8.17 310.14 17,563.41 402 .. 80 487.71 $86,721.47 $236,248.03 "C-4" IND I VI DUAL DISTIU CTS CLAIMS PAJD JANUARY 30, 1979 WARR/\NT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 44502 County of Orange, Lab Analysis, Contract 2-19 an<l 2-20 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT.NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 44503 Charles C. Regan Co., Resurfacing TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 44504 · County of Orange, Lab Analysis 3-20-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 44505 State of California, Annex 83 Processing Fee TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 "D" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 450.13 450.13 AMOUNT 2,540.00 2,540.00 AMOUNT 344.89 344.89 2,884.89 AMOUNT 145.00 . 145. 00 "D" u u "E~' : RESOLUTION NO. 79-14 AWARDING JOB NO. J-3-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INSTALLA- TION OF GAS ENGINES WITii GEAR DRIVES AT R011fROCK OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, JOB NO. J-3-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written reconunendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. for INSTALLATION OF GAS ENGINES WI'TII GEAR DRIVES AT ROTHROCK OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, JOB NO. J-3-1, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby receiyed and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. J-3-1 be awarded to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. in the total amount of $247,225.00 in accordance with the terms of thier bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #9CB) -ALL DISTRICTS "' A., D I J) 'J~ /\ n lJ J, /\ 'J' I 0 N It'ebruury 0 t 1979 s JI g J~ 'r 11:00 l\. M • • • . JOll NO. J-3-1 INSTJ\LLl\TION 01~ Gl\S ENGINI;;s WIT II GEAR DlUVES AT l'flOJEC'l' 'rl'l1 LE RO'l'JIHOCI~ OlJ'l'Fl\LL DOOSrrER f; '1'1\. '11 I ON PHOJECT DE~CflIPTION Installation. of enqines and qcar drives, removal and replacement of pumps, and miscellaneous other work. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 479,922.00 --- CONTR.7\CTOR l. P~scal & 'Ludwig, Inc. Upland, CA 2 • Triad .Mechanical, Inc .. Stanton, CA .3° Waldinger Corporation · Des Moines , Iowa 4. Equinox Malibu · Malibu, CA · . · DUDGE'l'. /\MOUN'!' $ ------- -·----- TO'l1AL DID $247,225 .. 00 321,123.00 .. 329,745,00 349, 500 .. 00 I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. of Upland, California in the bid amount of $247,225.00, as the lowest and best bid. "F" ~~-s----Pr -~-~=--c::\--t~·~ Donald Bogart ',\ Senior Engineer the above recommendation. AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "F" v . .• RESOLUTION NO. 79-15 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE SPRINKLING SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P\\7-070 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, .1 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE SPRINKLING SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'Ibe Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' Chief Engineer, .. for FIRE SPRINKLING SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT.NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section·2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for . bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. II G" AGENDA ITEM # 9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS ~I H" RESOLUTION NO. 79-16 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lF AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL·PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lF, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 1hat the contractor, Caliagua, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lF, on January 24, 1979; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended ,. acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered u filed; and, U ' Section 3. 1hat Job No. J-6-lF is hereby accepted as complete in ·accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 28, 1978; and, Section 4. ·That the Chairman of District ~o. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Cali~gua, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Digester Gas Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. ~ are hereby authorized and directed to execute said' agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM # 9CE) -ALL DISTRICTS II H" u : RESOLUTION NO, 79-17 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH OCWD FOR DATA SEARCH RE WATER REUSE STUDY A RESOLUTION OF TliE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHOR- ING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR DISTRICTS TO PERFORM DATA SEARCH IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORANGE AND LOS ANGELES COUNTIES WATER REUSE STUDY AND PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF SAID DATA SEARCH COSTS TO THE DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are·parties to that certain joint powers agreement dated June 27, 1978, with County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Orange CoWlty Water District, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to conduct a regional water resuse (reclamation) study of the Orange/Los Angeles Metropolitan area; and, WHEREAS, the joint powers authority has requested that a data search relative to said study be conducted by Districts' staff personnel;and, WHEREAS, the joint powers water reuse study is the recipient of a State,and Federal. grant· for said study, which said grant conditions require the grant administering member of the joint powers authority to enter into a contract with the performing agency for any reimbursable work to be performed by said agency; and, WHEREAS, the Orange County Water District is the grant administering member of the water reuse study joint powers authority. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, s·, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and between ~~~~~~~~ County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County and the Orange County Water \._,) District for performance of data search by Sanitation Districts' personnel relative to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study and providing for reimbursement "l-1" AGENDA ITEM # 9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "l~l" of said data search costs incurred by Sanitation Districts, be, and is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. ?, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. ' "1-2" ·AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "l-2" -2- : RESOLUTION NO. 79-18 ADOPTING PREVAILING WAGE RATES TO BE PAID BY CONTRACTORS AS DETERMINED BY DIRECTOR OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNfY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PREVAILING RATES OF WAGES TO BE PAID TO ALL WORKERS EMPLOYED ON PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS WITHIN THE DISTRICTS AS DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, UNTIL THE AMENDMENT OR REVOCATION OF THIS RESOLUTION * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Section 1771 of the Labor Code of the State of California requires that not less than the general preva~~ing rate of per diem wages shall be paid to all workers employed on public works contracts; and, WHEREAS, Section 1770 of the Labor Code of The State of California requires that the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations shall determine the prevailing rate of per diem wages for the locality; and, WHEREAS, the Director has determined and published the prevailing rate of per diem wages for Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California requires that any body awarding any contract for public works shall obtain from the State Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in the locality in which the public work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of workers needed to execute the contract, and further allows such public body to incorporate, by reference thereto, said prevailing rates in the Notice Inviting Bids, specifications and contract, and indicate that a copy is on file in the ~ office of the Secretary of the Districts rather than setting forth said per diem · rates in each call for bids, in the bid specifications and in the contract itself. '..,/ NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, "J-1". AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" \ 'i. ' . DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. That the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of workers needed to execute public works contracts and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work for each craft, classification, or type of workers are in accordance with the schedules determined and published by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations, and are on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 2. That a copy, of this resolution shall be posted at each jobsite prior to the conunencement of any work; and, Section 3. That Resolution No. 78-38 and any other resolutions, motions or portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979 ~------------'--~~~---- "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" -2- "K'' .. RESOLUTION NO. 79-23-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION .DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-1: (SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING) * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors_ by Lowry and Associations, for OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l, (SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING), are hereby approved and adopted: and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health. and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEH #9CL) -DISTRICT NO. 2 "K" "L" RESOLUTION NO. 79-25-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY DISTRICT RIGHT OF .WAY TO LOS CABALLEROS RACQUET AND SPORTS CLUB, LTD.,ET AL. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY TO LOS CABALLEROS RACQUET AND SPORTS CLUB, LTD.,ET AL. RE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RIGHT OF WAY * * * * * * * * * * * * \ The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain License to Occupy Right of Way dated , granting Los Caballeros Racquet and Sports Club, Ltd., et al. the right to occupy District's right of way for the Santa Ana River Interceptor in the vicinity of the westerly river bank south of Warner, is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute said License to Occupy Right of Way, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED.at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT NO. 2 II L" t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -108114 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALifORNIA 92708 CHft.NGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A --~~--~---------------- ~ c. o. N0. __ ~4----------------~ CONTRACTOR: Kordick & Rados, 1\ Joint Venture ·DATE February 7, 1979 KNO'I'T INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OP REACH 7, CON'l'R/\CT NO. 3-20-3 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 7,215.94 -----~~~--~--~- In accordanc.e with controct provisions, the following clwnges in the contrQct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated July 11, 1978, January 4, 1979, May 2, 1978, and January•9, 1979. ADD: 1. 2. Relocate fire line at Station 689+47 Contractor encountered a 6" water main not shown on the plans. 'rhis water main goes into the J_,a Palma Junior High School property. ~or bypa.ss and removal of water main 3. At Station 737+98±, Contractor encountered a 2" water main not shown on the plans. For ~ bypass and remo~al of water main 4. At Station 751+00±, Contractor encountered traffic signal conduits not shown on the plans. For removal and replacement of the traffic conduits s. Contractor encountered extra work due to debris at connection to Job No. 3-20-2 at Station 668+50±. · . ... TOTAL ADD: The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of :contract. time for the above items: 3 calcndnr days • "M-1" AGENDA .ITEM #9(0) -DISTRICT NO. 3 $ 750.01 $2,660.33 $2,220.68 $ 773.47 $ 811.45 $7,215.94 "M-1" COUNTY S/\NITATlON l>ISTRJCTS OF OR/\NGE COUNTY P. 0. UOX 8127 -108'1'1 Cl.LIS /\Vl:NUE F 0 lJ NT A I I~ VAL LC Y / C /\ L J F 0R1-J I /\ <J 2 I 0 8 ... CHANGE ORDEI~ GR/\NT NO. ___ N/._A _______ _ CONTRACTOR; Kordick & Hados, 1\ ,7oi.nt Venture C.O. NO. 4 ·u DATE~~--~_..;.;F_c_b_r~u~a_r_y_7 __ ,~1~9~7~9~--- JOB:~--KN~O_T_T~I_N_T1_~n_c_E_·P_T_o_R~,~r_on_,T_I_o_N~O-F~R-E~_Ac_1_1_7~,~c_6_N_T_R1\_C_T~N_o_.~3_-_2_0_-3~~------~------------- . . SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total •rime Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date ,,.,, . .. December 29, 1977 365 Calendar Days December 28, 1978 3 Calendar Days 8 Calendar Days 373 Calendar Days January 5, 1979 Or.i g i na 1 Contr<lct Price $ 3,880,113.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 3,034.00 This Chn.ngc (f\D D) ('):[=9Wf) $ 7,215.9'1 /\mended Contruct Price $ 3,890,362.94 --- Ooarcl i!Uthor i znt ion cliltc: February 14, 1979 /\pp rovc.~d: "M-2" COUlffY Sf\rJ IT /\TI ON DISTRICTS of Ornnge County, CcJ 1 if orn in Oy _________ ~----------~~- Ch i e f [nfjincer AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -DISTRICT NO .. 3 "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 79-28-11 AUTHORIZING FILING GRANT APPLICATIONS RE COAST HIGHWAY AND NEWLAND STREET TRUNK SEWERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANlTATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY OWNE WASTE- WATER TREATMENT WORKS:RE.COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACH 2, AND NEWLAND STREET TRUNK SEWER, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Ma~ager is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of County. Sanitation District No. 11, an Application for . Federal Assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive a grant under said act and a state grant under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 ~ and/or 1974 for construction of wastewater treatment works; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 11 hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if grants for its project are made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and state statutes, it will comply with all applicable state and federal statuatory and regulatory requirements, including but not limited to the Assurances contained in the Federal Grant Application and the State Grant Contract, The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended, relating to the right of the. public to obtain information and records, The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, U.S.C. 470 et seq., as amended, relating to the preservation of historic landmarks, The Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act, 18 U.S.C. 874, 40 U.S.C. 276c and the regulations issued thereunder, 29 CFR 3.1 et seq., and The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 327 et seq., and the regulations issued thereunder. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. "N" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICT #11 "N" RESOLUTION NO. 79-19 AUTIIORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. PW-069 AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-197 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING TIIE GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD AND EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR INTERIM SLUDGE FACILITY SITE PREPARATION AT COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL, JOB NO. PW-069, SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF EXECUTED LAND USE AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE, GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY, AND SOLID WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT FROM COUNTY OF ORANGE, SOLID WASTE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-197 RE AWARD OF SAID JOB * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Enginer that award of contract be made to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for Interim Sludge Facility Site Preparation at Coyote Canyon Landfill, Job No. PW-069, subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, for sewage solids processing and disposal_ by Districts on County's Class II-2 landfill site, and the solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved by the State Solid Waste Management Board; the tabulation of bids; and the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to award said contract to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the total amount of $208,spo.oo, in accordance with the terms of the~r bid and the prices contained therein, subject to receipt of the executed land use agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, and the solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved by the State Solid Waste Manage1'!1cnt Board; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed, to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(n) -ALL DISTRICTS np-1 11 . . . the provisions of the specifications and contract docwnents therefor, and the stipulations set forth herein, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. Tilat all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected; and, Section 5. Tilat Resolution No. 78-197 adopted on December 13, 1978, be, and is hereby, rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979. u u "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(n) ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" D I D T A n U L A T I 0 N S JI E E 'l' JOl3 NO. PW-069 ---IN'l'ERIM SE\·i/\GE SLUDGE Fl\CILITY SITE December 13, 1978 11:00 l\.M. PHEPARJ\'l'ION Nr COY01'E Cl\NYON Ll\NDFILL PROJECT DESCnIPTION ~~~~----~~~:--~~~~---~~----~~~--- ENGINEEH 's ESTIM/\'l'E $ 150 I 000. 00 BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------ -~,.,.-.=s--=cz::i==-==r=====:::i:z=::x::z::::~=";""=======-··------ CONTRAC'l,OR TOTAL BID =======~c-:;--===================--===========r====================:::::::::====== 1. John·A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Azusa, CA 2 Sukut Construction • Santa Ana, CA" "Q" AGENDA ITEM· #llCn) -ALL DISTRICTS. $20°8, 500. 00 $256,500.00 "Q" BREl.\L, Inc. 401 S. BAE/\ BLVD. BREA, CA. 92621 r-ru::n In tho O!flco ot c ho ~<.·r.rP.t:iry County Sanit..:at"'.m Pfr..,trict No~ 2-~-----------~ JAN 1 0 1979 -------1·---·----{7_1_4_) _9_9_2-_2_1_2_1 _______ ··.._..19_.~'·-· ~:...Q~~·------ By.,.,.:;.. ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS Alan G. S. West, Prosidr.nl Michael D. CohC'n, C.P.A. Don McRridc Reverend noswcll C. McFadden A William Mochon, C.P.A. P. Oougl:ts Tripp Carol D. Weddle ,,. "R" January ~~t · ·1979 Sanitation District #2 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca~ 92708 Re: Breal, Inc o lfon-profi t, Low-Cost Senior Citizen Housing Project Honorable Board of Directors: I am requesting an opportunity to speak before you at your next regular meeting of January 10, 19'79. The Brea Rotary Club and all local organizations are building 30 units of low-cost housing for the senior citizens of Brea without the aid of County, State or Federal fundso The City has leased to our non-profit corporation (Breal, Inc.) a piece of City owned property for 50 years at a cost of $1~00 per year. When the lease is up, all property and improvements enure to the City. The City has waived all fees for this project. All labor on the project is free and much of the mater- ials is also free or at cost. If we were to pay f'or land and improvements, the pro- ject would cost approximately :1~900,000. The local United California Bank in Brea has loaned to Breal, Inc. $350,000, which we feel will complete the project. Projected rents are approximately ~pl25 .oo per month per unit because there is no profit motive involved. The Breal Board is made up of 7 members, 5 Rotarians, 1 representative from the Brea Ministerial Association, and 1 representative from the City of Brea selected by the City Council. We are within 30 days of ground breakingo We are asking for relief of the usual sunitat1on fees connected with this project at an approximate price of $6,6000 Thank you in advance. ,fl~:r.ds/1 , // dlictlf#~JJM ,:;:Klan G.; S-.--J.v est President ·i . · . • I ., . ''rlf' 6L AGSW:g'tJ·'· (_.( r .. -·L. • .. •• t •• •.'. •. AGE~DA ITEM #29 -DISTqJCT 2 "R" I\ u JOHN GEYMOl 111. M;1ynr Mllll/\M Kl\ YWOO[), ~.1.1yor Pro Tc111 E. l.l.CWFLL YN ll\11. l<l IOLT, Jll .. Co1111c1l111:m OB. WILLIAM I. KUTT, Counc1lm.111 CITY OF ANAHEIM. C/\l.IFOnNIA Mr. Fred Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 204 EAST LINCOUJ AVENUE (714) &33·hG26 January 25, 1979 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: DON H. ROTH, Coun1:1tm<1n At the Board of Directors meeting held on January 10, 1979 for District No. 2 a request was received from the City of Brea for a waiver of the sewer connection fees for a Senior Citizens Hous.ing Development being constructed by a non-profit organization on municipally owned land. The Anaheim City Council at its meeting ·of January 16, 1979 passed a Motion by unanimous vote in support of County Sanitation District No. 2 amending its Ordinances to permit a waiver of sewer connection fees for projects being constructed on municipally owned land. I would appreciate your advising this off ice of any proposed action regarding this matter so that we may give this proposal our vigorous support. Ver!£ .. t ul~ours, ~ \./ ~/fj/' /'!~'9~'7_:;9.·!Af_/~ r .A''? ~~ ~~...-~ "'·~ . ./r ' •. · John p. 7e rtfiour Mayor TEP: la cc: City Council City Manager "S" Director of Public Works City Engineer AGENDA ITEM #29(A) -DISTRICT NO. 2 r. o. uox :in:? ,., /\NAHt:tM. t:/\1.1ronN1/\ n;iB0~1 "S" .. '~ Mr. Fred Harper General Manager CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFOlmIA .January 25, 1979 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: The City of Anaheim currently has two projects in the planning/design phase which will be constructed on municipally own~d .land and leased to a non-profit organization. In accordance with the requested change in· the connection fee ordinance to permit waivers of fees for projects being constructed on municipally owned land, the City of Anaheim requests that fees for the Addition to Anaheim Stadium and the Anaheim Convention Center be waived. These projects are considered to be of County wide benefit and importance. Please call this office if you desire additional information or if I may be of further assistance. Very truly yours, "-:?# ~ e 0 ··-~""~ -'-)~t&~T"~~ ,;. .;;;e~~ Thornton E. Piersall Director of Public Works TEP:la cc: Mayor John Seymour City Council City Manager City Engineer "U" AGENDA ITEM H30(A) -DISTRICT NO. 2 "U" P. O. H<.lX 3222, Anaheim, C:ulifornia 92803 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 1, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., February 14 , 1979 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors be adjourned to 8:30 a.m., February 22, 1979, at the Orange County Transit District office. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., February 14, 1979. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 1, and 11, of Orange County, California, ao hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of February , 1979 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 19 79 • S-107 day of February e Boards of Directors ·tation Districts Nos. , 7, and 11 DISTRICT 5 DIRECTORS: We have added to the Joint Chairman 's agenda listing approval of the minutes of the District 5 Adjourned Meeting on January 23 , 1979. This was inadvertently left off agenda item #6 when the agenda mater i a l was mailed. 2-14-79 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN WE HAYE BEEN ADVISED BY MIKE DILLON) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CASA) THAT IT APPEARS THAT THE DISTRICTS WILL RECEIVE THEIR PRO RATA SHARE OF THE 1% AD YALOREM TA X THIS YEAR) AND THAT THE PRO- VISIONS OF SB 154 ADOPTED LAST YEAR TO THE EFFECT THAT SPEC IAL DISTRICTS WILL NO LONGER RECEIVE AD YALOREM TAX WILL NOT BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE THIS YEAR •. DURING THIS PAST YEAR) THE DISTRICTS RECEIVED $10 MILLION I N AD YALOREM TA XES, CASA HELD A WORKSHOP IN INDIAN WELLS JANUARY 19 & 20) AND THE DISTRICTS WERE REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT 6 CHAIRMAN ELVIN HUTCHISON). FORMER JOINT CHAIRMAN DON WINN) TOM WOODRUFF) AND ~ FRED HARPER, (PERHAPS ASK FOR COMMENTS FROM ANY OF THESE), .. . .. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,J WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28TH. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: Ch_OUIS VELASQ~ HARRIETT WIEDER ~ DUANE WINTERS MEETING DATE February 14, 1979TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ~WELSH) • • • • • • • ·SHARP • • • • • • • V __ _ ORTIZ)···•·· .. ·EVANS······· V'° __ _ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ·-~ --__ CRANK) .•••• HUTCHISON ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 2 ~FRIED) •••••••• WEDAA· • • • • • -~ ---- RASHFORPL •••• HOLT •••••••• 0... ---- ANTHONY) 4 ••••• 8LARIE. • • • • • .-1tL_ ---- COOPER• • • • • ·~ ----. ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM.····-~ __ -- .WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON· • • • • V' ---- EVANS)······· -ORTIZ·······~ ---- CULVER) •• •••• ·PERRY·······~ ---- SEYMOUR)· • • • • • ROTM • • • • • • • ~ ---- HOYTJ • • • • • ····SMITH· • • • • • ·~ __ --ADLER) •••••••• STANTON····-~ ___ _ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ· • ·~ __ -- DI STR JCT 3 (ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD • • • -~ ___ _ (MEYER) •••••••• GRIFFIN·····~ ___ _ CPERRY) ......... CULVER ••••• -~ ---- (COOPER) •••••• -GAMB I NA· • • • ·~ ___ _ LACAYO)······· HUDSON······~ ---- SE ITZJ • ~ •••••• LASZLO· • ••• -~ ___ _ WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER······~ ___ _ FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON· • • • • • ·~ __ ·--· EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ.······~ ___ _ NYBORG) ••••••• PR I EST· • • • • ·~ ___ _ YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET •• • • • • ·~ ___ _ SEYMOUR)· • • • • ·ROTH· • • • • • • ·~ ___ _ PATTINSON) .•••• SIEBERT •••• -...&£ ___ _ ZOMMICK) •• · .•• ., .• SYLVIA ••••• ·~--·-- "ANTHON.Y) .. ·., .~IE!ER ••••• ·~ ___ _ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····~ ___ _ DISTRICT 5 ~liUMMEU • • • • • • • RY~KOFF • • • • • V' --·-- ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • ·~ ---- RYCKOF F) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • • .,,,,, ---- D JSTR I CT 6 ( RYCKOFF) •••••• MC .INN i.s ...• J!!!!:_ _. ___ . ( RI LEY) .•••••••• ANTJ:lON'l· • • • ~ __ -.- (CRANK) •••••••• H.UTCHI SON··~ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 HOYT • \ •• ~ •••• SMITH ••••••• V" ___ _ WAHNERJ ·······GLOCKNER •••• ......,.-___ _ (ANTHONY).···· @LARI(·······~ __ --(ORTIZ~·.·.· .• •• -EVANS······~ ----~WELSH • ·······SALTARELLI·~~ ___ _ GAIDO • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· • ·~ ___ _ RYCKOFF) ••••• ·WILLIAMS· •• ·~ ---- DISTRICT 11 MAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON· • ~ ---- PATTJNSQN)· -• ·BA.JLEY· · • • ·~ ----ANTHO~JY) ••• • • L!J'EBER • • • • ·~ ___ _ 2/14/79 ~RI LEY.)· • ·······ANTHONY· • • • ___.. __ . ~ATTINSQN) ••••• BAILEY ••••• ~ ~c:;~ ,,~ITll9HY) •••••• ~ ••••• ·-=-__ COOPER·····~-·­ PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER ••••• ~ _. -. ORTIZ). •••••••• EVANS •••••• ~ __ COOPER) •••••••• GAMBINA •• .; .~ _. _._ WAHNE~) •••••••• GLOCKNER ••• ·.,_...--·-· ROGET ••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ --· MEYER ••••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ..,,,,,, _. _ RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT •••••• -~ __ WELLS) ••••••••• HOUSTON •••• ~ __ LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON ••••• ~ __ CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON •• ~ __ SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO •••• -~ __ RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ~ __ WEISHAUPT) ••••• MILLER ••••• ~ -- FINLAYSON) ••••• OLSON •••••• ~ __ EVANS). •••••••• ORTIZ ••••• -~ ~.Q~ MAC AL~ISTER) •• PATTINSON.·~--~~~ CULVER •••••••• PERRY •••••• ~ -- NYBORG •••••••• PRIEST ••••• ~ __ ANTHONY) ••••••• RILEY •••••• ~ _. _ YOUNG) ••••••••• ROGET ••• ··.-~ __ SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH •••••• • ~ -.- HUMME~) •••••••• RYCKOFF •••• _lL __ WELSH ••••••••• SALTARELLI-~ __ WELSH •.•• ;. ••••• SHARP •• -: ••• --&£, -- PATTI NSONJ •• ••• SIEBERT ••• -~ __ HOYT)·· • • • • • • • ·SMITH. • • • • • ...........-__ ADLER)· • • • .: • • • .·STANTON. • • • ~ __ RYCKOff) ••••••• STRAUSS •••• ~ __ ADLER) ••••••••• SVALSTAD ••• ~ __ ZOMMICK). ····~·SYLVIA.·····~ __ GAIDQ). ·" • • •·• •• VARDOULIS.. ....,..... __ WINTERS).·····. VELASQUEZ.·.~ __ FRIED)········!' WEDAA. • • • • ·~ __ ~Tll9NY). • • • • • • \'lIEBliR· • • • .__::_ __ RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLIAMS •• -~ __ (VELASQUEZ). •••• WINTERS •••• ._..,..... __ :OTHERS HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER.·-- LEWIS •••••• __ CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN •••••• __ .. WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER •••• __ HOWARD ••••• __ HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH •••••• __ KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••••• __ MADDOX ••••• __ MARTINSON •• __ PI ER SALL •• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ -~ February 14, 1979TIME 7:30 P.M. MEETING DATE DISTRICT 1 -----DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 .Jw\ ~~IELSH) • • • •. • • • ·SHARP ••• b-. • • • II __ _ ORTIZ) •••••• .. ·EVANS• Jr-X-.. ' • • .---r-__ _ -RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY~ •••• _ _f_ __ CRANK) .•••• HUTCHISON _.; __ == DISTRICT 2 RASHFORP) ••••• HOLT •••••••• _L_ -__ ~FR I ED) • • • • • ••• WEDAA ••••••• _v ___ _ ANTHONY) ~ ••••• ~ •••••• _ii ____ _ COOPER· ·JJi • ·-7----. ROGET) ••. • ••••• GRAHAM~ • • • ·--___ _ .WELLS).·· •••••• HOUSTON ••••• _./_. ___ _ EVANS)······· ·ORTIZ······ ._L ----CUL VER) ••••••• PERRY ••••••• _v ____ _ SEYMOUR)· • • • • • ROTH • • • • • • • ~ ___ _ HOYT J • • ·······SMITH······· ./. ___ _ ADLERJ •••••••• STANTON ••••• --r- WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ ••• ./ == == DISTRICT 3 ~ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD •••• __:!__ ___ _ ~MEYER) •••••••• GRIFFIN·····__L ___ _ PERRY) •••••••• CULVER······ ../ COOPER) ••••••• GAMBINA· • • • .-J----- LACAYO)······ ·HUDSON······ ~ == == SEITZ) • ~ •••••• LASZLO· •;;;t, •• _.1 ____ _ WEISHAUPT} •••• MILLER ••••• v' FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON.·····.-./-. ----. EVANS} •••••••• ORTIZ.·····.-,---·--· NYBORG) ••••••• PRIEST •••••• -.;----- YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET ••••••• -.,;-· ---- SEYMOUR)· • • • • ·ROTH· • • • • • • .-"-. ---- PATTINSON)._ ••• SIEBERT.... .J == == .ZOMMICK) •• · .• • ..... SYLVIA •••••• .; --·-- ANTHON.Y) •. • .. , ~ • -WI ~;gER •••••• -:-r VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS..... ,/ == == _ DISTRICT 5 ~liUMMElJ ••••••• RYCKOFF.; ••• ·-" ---· __ ANTHONY) •· • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ._../_ ---- RYC KOFF)· • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ._./_ ---- DISTRICT 6 ( RYCKOFF) •••••• MC .INN is .... ~ ____ . ( R I_LEY) .~ ••••••• AN.TJ:IONY .. • • • • ·~ ___ _ (CRANK) •••••••• H.UTCH I SON· • ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 HOYT • \ ••••••• SMlTH ••••••• ~ ___ _ WAHNERJ ·······GLOCKNER •••• _,,, ____ _ { ANTHOrY) • • • • • • Ct:A-Rtt=-· • • • • ._.,,_. ---- ( ORTl Z •••• .• ··-EVANS······.__:!__ ___ _ ~WELSH • ·······SALTARELLI·~~ ___ _ GAIDO • • • • • • • ·VARDOULIS· • • v' RYCKOFF>······WILLIAMS····~ == == DISTRICT 11 MAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON·. ~ __ -- PATTINSON)··· ·BAILEY··· •• ·-,/-__ --ANTHO~Y J •••••• W~ •••• ·~ ___ _ ·2/14i79 JOINT BOARDS ~RI LEY.) • • • • • • • • ·ANTHONY· • • • _v_ ----. r-. PATTINSQN) ••••• BAILEY ••••• ......:::::::--~~, ANTHONY). • • • • • CLARK •••••• ___ . _ COOPER····· · · -~PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER ••••• == ---- ORTIZ) ••••••••• EVANS •••••• __ --·_ COOPER •••••••• GAMB I NA •••• _ .. _. . .. WAHNE~L ••••••• GLOCKNER ••• _. _. _ ---- ROGET ••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• _ .. -·---·- MEYER ••••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ____ ._ RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT. •••••• __ . -··- WELLS) ••••••••• HOUSTON •••• __ LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON..... -- CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON •• == ---- SEITZ). •••••••• LASZLO ••••• ___ _ RYCKOFFL •••••• MC INNIS ••• ____ · WEISHAUPT) ••••• MILLER ••••• ___ _ FINLAYSON). •••• OLSON •••••• ___ _ EVANS) ••••••••• ORTIZ •••••• ____ ·' ),_.. MAC AL~I STER) •• PATTINSON •• __ ____:::---1U1---1Ytc.A,· CUL VER •••••••• PERRY •••••• _./ __ _ NYBORG •••••••• PR I EST ••••• _.; __ _ ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••••• _v __ _ YOUNG) ••••••••• ROGET •••.••• _./ __ _ SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• _v_. __ HUMME~) •••••••• RYCKOFF •• -•• ~ __ WELSH •••.•••••• SALTARELLI ·--t--__ WELSH •.•• \ ••••• SHARP.~~ ••• _v __ _ PATTINSONJ· ··.·.SIEBERT •••• _../_·-- HOYT)····.".···. SMITH •••••• _i1 __ _ ADLER)····~··· .·STANTON.··· •• _.1 __ _ RYCKOf F) • • • • • • • STRAUSS •• ·•• ..; ADLER)· • • • • • • • • SVALSTAD. • .. v == ZOMMICK). ····~·SYLVIA...... .I GAIDO)· ·" • • •·•·•• VARDOULIS •• -./--- WINTERS).······ VELASQUEZ.·. -v--- FRI ED)·.·.·····. it WEDAA •••••• -v---- ANTHONY).······ WIEDER·· ••• -:;;--- RYCKOFF) ••••••• WLLLIAMS ••• -v--- VELASQUEZL •••• WINTERS.... ..; == :OTHERS HARPER ••••• _v_ fl ~ SYLVESTER •• ~ x,.tt._ , LEW IS •••••• ~ ·-v ~ji ~ ~:f,h<c,I CLARKE •••• ·-""- . u l BROWN •••••• _v_ ~l c;l,.,4,_ 'iLfl.r>JO ,,.,_,Hf} ~ WOODRUFF ••• ~ l{UV'a,L.j/ \ HOHENER •••• __ IA: -;t-fi'iJJ ~le) HOWARD •••• ·- 1/" ~ HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH •••••• ~ KENNEY..... . LYNCH •••••• -Y 'jlj:':DD@K. ~ •• ·--1- MARTI NSON •• _v_ PI ER SALL. •• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• · __ FEBRUARY 14, 1979 JOINT MTG . a) Report of the Joint Chairman Saltarelli reported that we have been advised by Mike Dillon , Executive Director of CASA, that it appea rs that the Districts will receive t he ir pro rata share of the 1 % ad va lorem t ax this year, and that the provisions of SB 154 adopted last year to the effect that special districts will n o longer receive ad valorem tax wil l not be implemented by the State L egi slature this year . During this past year, the Districts received $1.1 or 12 million. Adv is ed that CASA held a workshop in Indian Wells January 19 & 20 and the Districts were repr esente d by Directors E l v in Hutchi son and Don Smith, former Joint Chairman Don Winn, Tom Woodruff and Mr. Harper . Don Smith briefly reported o n conference; said it was a good confe r ence . Then Saltarelli called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday , February 28th and i nvited Directors Louis Ve l asquez and Ray Williams to attend. (7-b) Report of the Gen e ral Manager Mr. Harper advised that in a n effort to get add i tional space, thought we wou l d try ou t some narrow tables in the front row . Asked Directors for commen t on t ab les and received it. HA. Will get back bigger tables. Reported that EPA still inte n ds to get ocean waiver regulations out by mid -March . Said at a r ece nt meeting in Washington they were convinced they are going to give us some regu lat ions that should make some s ense . Are gearing up to fight some environmental group s and may take them to court. They say they will give adequate time for agencie s to do monitoring required. Referred to con s ent calendar i tem (9-b) re award of Job No . J-3-1 , Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station, to Pascal & Ludwig. Pascal & Ludwig are asking that they be excu3ed from accepting award. We are asking that this item be removed from consent calendar and recommending that the letter from Pascal & Ludwig be ref erred to the General Counse l for further study and r ecommendatio n and will report back next month. *See page 2 also. Re item (9 -e) would like that item removed from agenda . Were accepting Digester Gas P i ping System at Ocean Ou tfall Pumping Station, Job No . J-6-lF, as complete, but c ontractor has now asked for a change order and we have to look into it . Re item (9 -i) advised of correction of dollar figure for value engineering services of Peter Barotti from $9 ,9 50 to $7 ,000 . Vardoulis ·made a suggest ion that in the event we can 't receive our part of the 1 % tax , we should seek legislation to hav e water purveyors do the billing for sewer service. Currently , there is legis l ation whereby water purveyor may bi ll for sewers . Said he would ask Directors tonight to support directing the attorney to try to get legislation introduced that would require t hem to do so. In order to do it now, we would have to try to convince some 60 water purveyors and doubt £f we could accomplish that. Wouldn't be on property tax so wouldn't have to have a public hearing. Laszlo asked how much we were talking about putting on water bill. Was answered $35-45. Wedaa reiterated that the proposed action was to ask attorney to provide us a list of pros and cons on this suggestion. He then so moved that the attorney be directed to provide Board with some pros and cons relative to seeking this type of legislation to collect charges on water bills. Motion seconded. Voice vote. Motion carried. *Re item (9-b) again, Saltarelliadvisedthat the letter of Pascal & Ludwig re Job No. J-3-1, needed to be received and filed. It was so moved, seconded and carried by voice vote. (11) Re: Sewage Sludge Management Facility TLW advised that as of today we have both good news and bad news. Said we do have a final agreement with the County re landf ill operation. Will be presented to Board of Supervisors on the 27th. Is in accordance with agreement worked out by staff with no major changes except Districts' staff requested that we be reimbursed on the same charge basis as County was paying its landfi ll contractor for any cover that we put on the site that they would n ot have to do. Our feeling was t hat i f we do work and place cover (requested to put 6 feet), will save County from paying their contractor. Feel we should be paid for doing it. That needs to be resolved. The bad n ews is this is not going to be heard by the State Solid Waste Management Board this month. They have determined they will not have possession of our negative declaration for sufficient legal time for which to grant their approval prior to State Board h earing on the 23rd, so will go over to the 15th of March . No signi ficant difficu l ties . Said is clear in my mind they wi ll approve processing but is just a matter of approving a nd the timing und er CEQA. (a) (b) (c) & (d) moved , seconded and carried. (15) Status report of Seecial Reorganization Committee Smith mentioned names of Committee members. by Don Smith) (See attached report read TLW added that conceptual program of consolidation of 7 Districts is to save money in each successive year. Problems are in trying to get an acceptab l e reorganization. Some Districts more flush than others; some Di str icts have outstanding bonded indebtedne ss; some Districts ab l e to construct master planned sewers and others not financially able to. Basica lly , if we go forward, wi ll process conso lidation under District Reorganization Act . Time consumi ng but not particularly difficult. Most difficult part is how to carry over and provide for retirement and outstanding bonded indebtedness. Are some options to choose. -2- TLW then referred to page 3 of report handed out to Directors . Said Exhibit "A" is a big map showing all of the master planned sewers in the Districts . Everything on green sheet is, as of today, fully funded. Schedule B-2 , blue sheet , i s everything that can be guaranteed to be constructed within 5 years . Everything on pink sheet is not guaranteed . These are not master planned sewer lines and their construction time is somewhat uncertain . Advised agreement has been prepared accordingly to address itself to those schedules . When this agreement is approved , wil l include approving those three schedules and that is basically the order everything will be built. Need 2/3 of all Directors and the vo t e of Director of city in which line is to be built in order to have veto effect on order. Re Section 6, we wi l l effectively account for monies for a given District . Money will be earmarked for a particul ar District and will stay there. Re Section 7 , by the end of 5 years will be enough money on hand to guarantee construct ion schedu l e of l i nes . Re Schedule I II, will not occur for at least f i ve years. Construction is based on flexibility and everything can be changed by simple majority vote of Directors present. Re Section 9, if trunk line is able to obtain a grant whereby it is 75% funded , then that can go to accelerated position. Re Section 1 0, if, as a condition of annexation , District needs a line and property owner says he wi l l build it , then that can go to front of line . If District approves a reimbursement agreement , won't get money until everything on blue sheet is paid for . Can't move ahead to top of list. Sections 11 & 12 are housekeeping sections re bond redemption monies . Wo n 't pay off a l l the bonds automatical l y . Section 13, important . Must follow priorities of monies which you have on deposit. Each existing District has financial obligations to (1) pay for two secondary treatment facilities; (2) pay off the bonded indebtedness within pre - existing District; and (3) build master planned trunk sewers . Any remaining funds wil l be refunded back to the property owners in the area in which it was accrued . Uncertain about this. Have done quite a bit of reaearch and haven 't come to any conclusions yet . If that is the desire of Directors, may entail future legislation and validating act. If not included , the monies would go into general funding and used for general funding purposes. Agreement would also provide for a uniform ordinance on connection and annexation charges. That has not been done but is forthcoming. Said Committee is looking for input from each respective District . Mcinnis said he had a burning question --is someone going to tell us how we are are going to save money? Said JWS would give brief report . JWS advised he would not go through report in detail . About 8 o·% already covered by TLW. Stated that yellow summary represented consolidated budget based upon our current funding levels for 5 -6 year cash flow projections . Have separate l isting for each District and a combined column. Is our intent to refer information to each respective District. Line 1 i s total cost of treatment plant expansion . Line 2 is those projects that are grant elligible , and Line 3 costs are to be funded by Orange County taxpayers. Line 4, outstanding bonds . Lines 5, 10 & 12 , construction schedules . By taking line 3 and adding outstanding bond principal and B-1 facilities , those are all fully funded total on line 7 . Mentioned for District 11 we have indicated a grant for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer. Total funding requirements on line 7 are what we need to pay for treatment plant expansion for -3 - next six years and set aside funds to pay outstanding General Obligation bonds and build master planned B-1 facilities. At that point still have a surplus amount in each of the seven Districts. Reported further that line 10 represents B-2 schedule of master plan facilities. Some of those trunk sewers are partially funded and others are not funded at all. Line 12 indicates B-3 facilities and that puts certain Districts in a deficit position. Line 14 indicates bond interest. By obligating current funds to pay off the principal and holding that money in short term investments, believe we can make sufficient interest on those funds to pay as it falls due. Wedaa asked if Committee is asking for each District to have a meeting within 45 days & provide some input to Committee and meet again. Was answered yes. He so moved and motion seconded. Question was asked why we are considering consolidation. Saltarelli answered that the reason why goes back many years. Grand Jury has requested that we consider this again. Will reduce number of Directors and fees paid to Board. Also eliminate duplication of keeping separate sets of books. JWS added that the original report given to Board several months ago indicated savings of $50,000 per year made up primarily of savings of Directors' fees and accounting costs. Smith stated that some of those figures will be followed through as we get further. Saltarelli said that if all Districts say they are interested in consolidation, will do a thorough analysis of cost savings to taxpayers and re clerical costs, etc. Then will bring matter back to Joint Board. If two or three Districts don't want to do it, no use going any further. Directors said they didn't think they were getting information they needed to make a decision. Saltarelli advised that this information was in the first report mailed out. Said will send report out again to Directors. Director said he would like cost of consolidation procedure also. Saltarelli added we think that the reasons are substantial. Cost savings may not be as dramatic as change would be. Is a public outcry for this. Said if you can do it in your District and feel your District's interests will be protected adequately and still have representation, then should do it, but if you can't be satisfied, then your District may not want to do it. Every District would have to approve it. Don't think it is feasible unless every District decides to do it. Are trying to make it equitable foi all Districts. Svalstad recommended for District 3 that the staff submit this material and information at the same time as the notification of the time and pla c P .nf the meeting for discussion. Saltare lli stated that it is very important for each District to meet with staff and attorney. Sharp a J ked if they will have data on operating costs before we have those meetings and was answered, definitely. Saltarelli advised that the re were no time constraints. Smith added that the Committee was shooting for July 1, 1980. Suggested that one Committee member or alternate attend each District meeting. -4- Olson asked if there would be any advantage if two Districts would combine their meetings. Said it could be done. Don't see any advantage. Saltarelli said staff will prepare more information and get it out to Directors. Directors said they would like Grand Jury report also. Will send this also. Question was asked when individual Districts get together, what is the vote required -was answered a majority of the Directors of the District. Voice vote on getting additional information. Motion carried. Saltarelli said we will coordinate with Chairmen of the Districts to set up meetings. Smith added that if two Districts want to joint together in a meeting, will be fine also. -5- (29) DISTRICT 2 -Breal request for waiver of connection fees Perry stated that he had direction from to vote on this item and possib l y other also , so would not need to discuss i t . from his council a l so. Other Directors discuss this. his council and knew what way Directors were ready to vote Velasquez said he had direction indicated they wanted to TLW commented that during the meeting last month there was some discu s sion regarding whether he should embark on researching alternative methods of providing for waiver of fees. Referred to his memo with the agenda material which just contains some of the thoughts of the Directors and staff . Said the r e is not a recommendation on any of the a l ternatives. They are just a shopping list of ways that could be accomplished in terms of providing for waiver of connection fees. Reviewed list of alternatives , a ll of which would require a new ordinance to be adopted by the District . Perry moved denia l of the request of Breal. Velasquez seconded the motion , with some confusion, he sa i d, because issue is not that clear. His council took a decisive step to oppose Breal request . Sorry to say that to Brea. Point of information asked for, asked when they voted on (a), was that only to receive and file? Was answered yes . Velasquez added, would like to have the b r oad issue of waiver of fees discussed by his council . Didn 't discuss whether government-owned land should be waived; only discussed Breal. Cooper addressed Velasquez and said , if I understand you correctly, you are saying it is not clear in your mind that we were just discussing a particular area? Velasques answered, no , the mer i ts of the various alternatives proposed by Counse l is not clear in my mind. Would like to go back to my council to discuss these alternatives. This particular project was discussed but not future possibilities. Graham said she felt that waiver should be denied for this particular project but would not oppose changing an ordinance to permit this to be waived in the future for Alternate No . 1 . Thought i f ordinance is changed , should be for a l l Districts and not just one District, for all municipally-owned land. Houston asked Graham if she was against giving Breal a waiver and she answered, yes. Houston added that his concern is that by taking action on Breal, does this necessarily mean that we have established a precedent, particularly for the City of Anaheim? TLW answered that if the majority vote of the Board is to effectively grant the waiver to Breal, would have to adopt an ordinance and probably would be setting a precedent. Ordinance could be written to specify certain conditions. Houston then asked if Anaheim's request falls into the category of Alternate No . 1. TLW answered , yes , they own both of those facilities and the land on which they sit. Stanton said he had heard two comments against this motion because are against Breal. Sa i d he was voting against motion beca u se he is against the general principle in any of the alternative forms. Will -6 - run into various interpretation problems. The most responsible and rational move calls for Directors to not a l low exceptions in any form. I f voting on Brea l, wou l d probably say yes . Would be opening up Pandora 's box. Cooper then stated that he would like to have the Chair read the < letter that Brea has presented today. Chair stated that letter would be included in the record. Roth stated that his council ins tructed him to vote in favor of Breal 's request. Said City of Anaheim just finished building a reti rement home . Feel that expansion of convention center and ballpark are certainly 100% publicly-owned and in our opinion, in the same category as Breal. Cooper said when he made his appeal, said that he would support any project that was similar to Breal's type of project . I f Anaheim or any other city within entire District would support any type of non- profit senior-citi zen type p roject, he would support it. No matter what the fees were . Anthony asked FAH if we have had any similar requests in the past . FAH answered, have had 2 or 3 of this type of request for waiver . Asked FAH's opinion. He answered it gets down to a political policy type question in his mind. District 2 wou l dn't miss that amount of money . It does shift the cost to other people in the District. With regard to five alternatives, if one opens the door a little bit, is some question in the staff's mind whether or not you can do it under the Federal regulations . Is some concern as far as the revene program. May find six months down the road that we may have to ask the Board to change the ordinance. Cooper then stated that in difference to whatever the vote will be , woul d like to wi thdraw the request and will request a deferment of payment of fees for a period of time, 1 0 years, 6 years, whateve r . Was advised that this woul d still require an ordinance change . Someone stated that this is out of order. Request for deferral should be a separate request and processed separately. Asked is request withdrawn at this time? Should probably table this f irst. JWS mentioned that at the last meeting the Board had deferred payment of fees pending a final determination on the waiver request by Board . Anthony suggested how about a motion to accept the withdrawa l request by the City of Brea. Would be a substitute motion . It was so mov e d to accept withdrawal of request for waiver of fees from City of Brea on behalf of Breal , Inc. Motion seconded . Voice vote . Mo t ion carried . (Didn 't get names of Directors voting no) Cooper then requested that a deferral of payment of fees for 10 years be granted. Perry sRid he would have to take that back to his council to discuss . TLW advised that would require an ordinance a mendment also. -7 - Velasquez said that was discussed in his council and they felt a deferral was synonymous with waiver . Stanton then moved that they table further consideration of any of the five alternatives for waiver and/or deferment of fees. Motion seconded. Question asked if that included the Anaheim issue. Said in effect, includes any further projects that come before us . Velasquez asked for a point of information . Asked the Chairman if there is any indication as to when this may be brought back up? Said in the absence of new specific recommendations or requests, fees will be due and payable immediately. Would have to be brought back on an agenda in order to go back to councils for discussions . Voice vote on motion to table. Motion carried. motion .) (This removed Perry 's JWS stated that the staff needs direction re last month's minutes re suspension of fees . Stanton said to delegate this to General Manager to allow some reasonable time within provision of existing ordinance. Culver then suggested that this matter re waiver of all fees from all Districts on a uniform basis be referred to the Executive Committee . Graham said they should have some financial data along with that . Vardoulis commented that it seemed to him that this project and any other project of this type when dealing with low-cost housing projects would qualify easily for HCDA funding . Why not? Cooper stated that this particular organization would like to keep every other governmental agency out so it wouldn 't get tied down. Stanton questioned Culver's suggestion to refer this to the Executive Committee. Said it was his interpretation of his motion that it tabled the waiving of fees . Saltarelli advised that it was only in District 2 that it was tabled. (30) DISTRICT 2 -Request of City of Anaheim for waiver of fees Question was asked if this still was an action item? TLW said we have a specific request before us and think something should be done with it. Moved to table Anaheim like Breal. (no second and motion dropped) Graham moved to deny request of City of Anaheim. Motion seconded. Voice vote. Motion carried. Roth voted no. -8- . "' ~-'~ ~79 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS FROM: DON SMITHJ CHAIRMAN OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON CONSOLIDATION THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO STUDY REORGANIZATION OF THE SANITA- TAION DISTRICTS FIRST MET ON OCTOBER 25TH TO DEVELOP A PLAN OF STUDY. WITH THE PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 13 LAST JUNE) THE TAX RATE ISSUE) J,E,J A DIFFERENT TAX RATE FOR EACH DISTRICT) IS NO LONGER OF CONCERN, ON JANUARY 24THJ THE COMMITTEE DEVELOPED A DRAFT AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION OF THE 7 SANITATION DISTRICTS INTO 1 DISTRICT. THIS EVENING) WE WOULD LIKE TO GIVE YOU A SHORT BRIEFING ON THE MAJOR POINTS CONTAINED IN THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT FOLLOWED BY A REVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF CONSOLIDATION, WHILE NO ACTION IS EXPECTED TONIGHT) THE COMMITTEE DESIRES A RESPONSE IN THE NEAR FUTURE FROM THE BOARDS TO DETERMINE IF CON - SOLIDATION IS DESIRABLE BEFORE PROCEEDING FURTHER, FOLLOWING TONIGHT'S BRIEFING) WE BELIEVE THAT EACH BOARD SHOULD MEET WITHIN THE NEXT 45 DAYS TO CONSIDER THE PROS AND CONS OF CON- SOLIDATION. EACH BOARD SHOULD DETERMINE IF THEY WISH TO HAVE THE COMMITTEE PROCEED WITH DEVELOPING A FINAL CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT, IF CONSOLIDATION IS TO BECOME A REALITY) IT IS THE COMMITTEE'S SUGGESTION THAT THE TARGET DATE BE JULY lJ 1980, OUR GENERAL COUNSEL) MR, WOODRUFF) WILL REVIEW THE 3RD DRAFT AGREEMENT AND THIS WILL BE FOLLOWED BY A BRIEF PRESENTATION BY OUR DIRECTOR OF FINANCE) WAYNE SYLVES TER) OF THE SUMMARY OF FUNDS AVAILABLE AND THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED,