HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-02-14COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. a. sax 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"CRNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID CF'f"·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
February 7, 1979
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2, 3, 5, 6J 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1979 -7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY; CALIFORNIA
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange
County, California, will be held at the above hour and date.
lTWS ! jc
Schedu}:::..~ upcomi:1g_~~eting_~:
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
FISCAL, POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, February 20, at 11:00 a.m.
DISTRICT l AD1.TOURNl~D MEE'I'ING Thursday, February 22, at 8:30 a.m.
Orange County TraDsit District off ice
11222 A.cacia Paxk'1iay, Gar.den Grove
-Wednesday, February 23, at 5:30 p.m.
Month
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
W'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 0 RANGE CouNTY. CALIFOBNIA
P.0.BOX 8127
· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. L'AUFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962·2·111
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Tentative Executive
Meeting Date Conunittee Meeting Date
Feb 14, 1979 Feb 28, 1979
Mar 14, 1979 Mar 28, 1979
Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979
May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979
June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979
July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979
Aug 8, 1979 None Scheduled
Sep 12, 1979 Sep 26, 1979
Oct 10,, 1979 Oct 25,, 1979
Nov 14, 1979 Nov 28, 1979
Dec 12, 1979 None Scheduled
Jan 9, 1980 Jan 23, 1980
Feb 13, 1980 Feb 27, 1980
II
~
-.·"-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
~ "-· ~County Sanitation Districts Post Off ice Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain. Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
FEBRUARY 14, 1979 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD, IN ADDITION, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P,M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necess~ry
(4) Recognition of special guests
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any
See supplemental agenda
(6) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 -January 10, 1979, regular and
February 7, 1979, special
District 2 -January 10, 1979, regular
District 3 -January 10, 1979, regular
District 5 -January 10, 1979, regular
District 6 -January 10, 1979, regular
District 7 -January 10, 1979, regular
District 11 -January 10, 1979, regular
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
~ :fsr _..,W ..... >
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s)
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See 'page ( s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 5" NONE
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( T )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by· one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines
with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station,
Job No. J-3-1, changing the time required for completion
from 300 to 360 calendar days, including a Guarantee Form
in the specifications and making a technical clarification
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-14, to receive and file
bid tabulatic;>n and recommendation and awarding contract for
Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock
Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig,
Inc. in the amount of $247, 225. 00. See pages "E" and
"F"
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
.issue a purchase order contract to Cooper Energy Services for
maintenance work on White Superior gas engines purchased for
installation at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station (Job No. J-3-1)
for a total amount not to exceed $10,000.00
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-15, approving plans and
specifications for Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse
at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See
page "G"
(e) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-16, accepting Digester Gas
Piping System at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF,
as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and
approving Final Closeout Agreement therefor. See page "H"
(f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of July 12, 1978,
engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver
of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem fee basis,
and authorizing an increase in the maximum fee from $20,000 to
$27,500
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-17, approving and authorizing
execution of agreement with Orange County Water District relative
to data search to be performed by the Sanitation Districts in
connection with the existing Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water
Reuse Study; and providing for reimbursement for data search costs
to the Districts. See page "!"
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-18, adopting prevailing wage
rates to be paid to all workers employed on public works contracts
within the Districts, as determined by the Director of the State
Department of Industrial Relations. See page "J"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
.f ... -. ~·
(i) Consideration of motion approving value engineering for Solids U
Handling and Dcwatering Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24, for a total outside professional
services cost not to exceed $43,350.00; and authorizing the staff
to engage the following individuals for professional services, on a
per diem fee basis according to their proposals, for a.maximum
fee not to exceed the amounts indicated:
Tim Haug, PH.D.,,P.E.
Engineering Science
Mark Butier, P.E.
Peter Barotti
Bill Hoagland, P.E.
Electrical Engineer (not
yet selected)
Maximum Fee
$3,500.00
9,,950.00
9,950.00
9,950.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
$43,350.00
(j) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Robin M. Lee (contractor's employee),, dated January 8, 1979,
in the amount of $10,000.00 in connection with construction
of Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR,
and refer to contractor and Districts' liability claims
administrator for appropriate action
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Kaspar G. Campbell, dated February 5, 1979, in the amount of
$485.96 for alleged damages to his vehicle, and refer to the
Districts' liability claims administrator for ap·propriate action
DISTRICT 2
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-23-2, approvlng plans· and
specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Repair, Contract No. 2-SR-1,
(Santa Ana River crossing), and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "K"
(m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-24-2, ordering
annexation of 9.892 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City
of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to
County Sanitation District No. 2
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-25-2, approving and authorizing
execution of License Agreement with Los Caballeros Racquet and
Sports Club, Ltd_. , et al. to occupy Districts' right of way for
t~e Santa Ana River Interceptor in the vicinity of the westerly
river bank, south of Warner, Contract No. 2-14-1. See page "L"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
u
u
(10)
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 3
(o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 7, Contract No. 3~20-3, authorizing an addition of
$7,215.94 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for
extra work required in connection with miscellaneous undisclosed
utility crossings and granting a time extension of three calendar
days for completion of said work. See page "M"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(p) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit
proposals for engineering services in connection with design
of the Santa Ana River Siphon, in accordance ·with the established
procedures for selection of professional engineering and
architectural services
DISTRICT 7
(q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79~26-7, ordering
.833 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast
of Lomita Avenue and Santiago Boulevard, proposed Annexation
No. 69 -Hauser Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7
(r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-27-7, ordering
6.216 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of
the northeast corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street
in the City of Orange, proposed ·Annexation No. 81 -Tract
No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7
DISTRICT 11
(s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-28-11, authorizing filing for
Federal and State Grants for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Portion
of Reach 1 and Reach 2, and Newland Street Trunk Sewer, and
providing certain assurances. See page "N"
(t) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to
engage a real estate appraiser for appraisal of State Parks
and Beaches right of way in connection with construction of
Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $2,000.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5-
-''=' -·-....
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items relative to the Sewage Sludge Management
Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file status report
of General Counsel re agreement with County of Orange for
permit to conduct sewage solids processing and disposal
operation on County's Class II-2 landfill site. See
page "0"
(b) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 on February 7, 1979,
directing the staff to prepare a negative declaration declaring
that the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill,
Irvine Area, County of Orange, will not have a significant effect
on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 1 to make a
negative declaration re Sewage Sludge Management Facility,
Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, on behalf
of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in accordance
with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-19, authorizing the General
Manager to award and execute contract for Interim Sludge Facility
Site Preparation at Coyote Canyon Landfill, Job No. PW-069, with
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the total amount of $208,500.00,
subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of
Orange, General Services Agency, and solid waste discharge permit
from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved
by State Solid Waste Management Board; and rescinding Resolution
No. 78-197 re award of said job. See pages "P" and "Q"
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding with
Orange County Employees' Association re Operations and Maintenance
employees for the period December 29, 1978, through November 29, 1979
(See separate report mailed with agenda material -If any Director
wishes to discuss this matter further, the Boards may convene in executive
session.)
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-20 relating to classification,
compensation and terms of employment (incorporating approved changes
with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict
·therewith
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-21 establishing rules and regulations
pertaining to conditions of employment (incorporating approved changes
with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict
therewith
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Status report of Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts
-6-
u
u
c
., ~
.---r '4,
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-22, to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding Polyelectrolyte
Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-033 Rebid, to
in the amount of $
--~~~~~~~~~~~ .....---.-~~~~~ (See supplemental agenda -bid opening date 2/13/79)
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Thomas M. Dawes,
currently an associate civil engineer with the County of Orange, as
Senior Engineer, Range 1061E, Step 2.5, ($12.79/hr.) and accepting transfer
of 630 hours accumulated sick leave, not to exceed $8,057.70, to be
credited to this employee and utilized only when earned District
sick leave is exhausted; and providing as a condition that no portion
of the transferred accumulated sick leave is eligible for sick leave
payoff upon termination, death or retirement.
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 8:30 a.m., February 22, 1979, at
the Orange County Transit District office
(19) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-7-
(29) DISTRICT 2
Further consideration of request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection
fees for a 30-unit low-cost housing project in the City of Brea (continued
--
from January 10th meeting) : See page i 1R" U
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of
Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, supporting a motion to amend
the District's Connection and Use Ordinance to permit a waiver
of sewer connection fees for projects being constructed on
municipally-owned land. See page "S"
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General
Counsel re Possible Alternative Provisions of Ordinance
Amendments re Waiver of Connection Fees. See page "T"
(c) Discussion
(d) Consideration of action on request.of Breal, Inc. for waiver of
connection fees
(30) DISTRICT 2
,,.
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of
Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, requesting waiver of connection
fees for the Addition to Anaheim Stadium and the Anaheim Convention
Center. See page "U"
(b) Discussion
(c) Consideration of action on request of City of Anaheim for waiver
of connection fees
(31) DISTRICT 2
Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(32) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
u
f
..._
'ti'--' BOARDS OF DIRE CTORS
Co unty San itation Districts Post Office Box 8127
II
o f Ora nge Co unty, California 10844 Elli s Avenue
Fou nta in Voll ey, Cal if ., 92708
Te lephones :
JOINT BOARDS Areo Code 714
540-2910
9 6 2 -2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
FEBRUARY 14',, 19 79 -7: 30 p IM I
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFOR MATIO N ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM ,, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI H~A D, IN ADDITION,, STAFF
WI LL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P,M, IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFE RENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge o f Al l egian ce an d Inv o catio n
(2) Roll Ca ll
(3) Appoi n tmen t of Chai rmen p r o tern, if n ecessary
(4) Recognition of s p e ci a l g u es t s
ADJOURNMENTS PGSTED .• ~
COMP & MILEJ\G E .... v.:':. ... .
FILES <;ET UP ...... V.:. ...... ..
RESOLllT 0 1,s CERli'.IEO ... v
LCTTE~S '.':RITTEN ............. .
MINUTES V:RIHEN ... ~ .. .
MINUTES HLED ................ -
~ \ ~ (5) Con sj deratj on of motj on to receive and fi 1 e mj nute ~xcerpt fyorn
the Board of Supervisors sho1d•l[! appointment of Di rector and
, if any
IH!.'SON
SUl'>LUArn!J.L AGiJ~DA al terna1.es to serve on the Dis:.ricts' Bo:1Hls as follows:
Director [)jstrict Altc.rnatc -----
Jlhjlip L. Anthony 111omas F . Riley
2 Rnl]>h B. Clark (Active)
3 Hairictt Wj edc.r (hctive)
5 Thomas F . Ril ey (Active )
1g meetings,
t 6 'Jhomas F . Riley
7 Ra l ph B . Clar]( (Active)
) ·-·-·--(7 )
:R --·---
A/C _ .. Tl<l.R ·-
........ -·--------
·······-·······-······-
ll HarriHt Wje<lcr (Activ0)
Di strict s -January 10, 1979 , regul ar, and
J anuary 23 , 1979 , adjourned
Di strict 6
Distri ct
District
ALL DI STR I CT S
Repo rt s o f :
7
11
-Jan uary
-J anu ary
Janu ary
@> Jo int Chairman
@:D Ge n e r a l Ma n ager
(c) General Counse l
10 , 1979, regu l a r
10, 1979 , regular
10 , 1979, regul ar
..
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion r atifying payment of claims of
ROLL C/\LL VOTE·····--·-h . -d · d · · d 1 D · · f ( t e Joint an in i vi ua istricts as ollows: Each Director shall
FILE --
LETTER __ .....
A/C __ .lKLR ....
-u••••t
1;... -
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expres ses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page (s)
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page (s)
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO . 2 See page (s ) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page (s) llB II and llD"
DISTRICT NO . 5 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page (s) llB II and "D"
DISTRICT NO . 11 NONE
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
N\\S
Roll Call Vot e or Cast
Una nimous Ball ot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS, 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( T )
All ma tters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless a ny particular item is reque sted to be r emo ved from
the consent ca l e ndar by a Director, s taff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will b e no separate
discussion of th ese items. All items on the consent cal end a r
will b e enacted by one action approving all motio n s , and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions inc l uded on the
consent cal e ndar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the r egular order of business.
item from the
the chair , state
the it em to be
~ge nda items appearing
~moved from same.
+
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
"LE ·······~·· ...... .
LeTTeR ............. .
A/C .... TKLR -·
............. ___
FILE ................ ..
FILE ................ ._
LEITER ............. .
A/C .... TKLR ··-
,,~~~--~~..hk!.}~---
f 1LE ................ ..
LEITER ............. .
A/C .... TKLRV
ChW.
~~
FILE ................. .
LEITER ............ ..
A/C .... TKLR .... /
.,. LO.~~~ .. -
~.Y. ........... .
<9~--~-~
A/C .... TKLR ....
~~
FILE ................ ..
LEnCR -··---··
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motio~ approving Addendum No. 2 to the
pl ans and specifications for Insta llation of Gas Engines
with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station,
Job No. J-3-1, changing the time required for completion
from 300 to 360 calendar days, including a Guarantee Form
in the specifications and making a technical clarification
~~~f' ldtJ"-~<:a0-4e.&0" ~Q·~ ~"*~---~ ..,_GC. ~ onsideration1)if-Resolution No . 79 -1 4, to receive and file
id tabulation and recommendation and awa rding contract for
nstallation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock
Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig,
nc. in the amount of $24 7, 225. 00. See pages "E" and
llfll
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
issue a purchase order contract to Cooper Energy Services for
maintenance work on White Superior gas engines purchased for
installation at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station (Job No . J-3-1)
for a total amount not to exceed $10,000.00
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-15, approving plans and
specifications ·for Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse
at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-070, and authorizing the General
Manager to estab lish the date for receipt of bids. -See
page "G"
Resolution No. 79-16, a ccepting Digester Gas
Piping y Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF,
a s comp l ete; authorizing exec ·ce of Completion; and
approv~ng Final Closeout Agreeme nt therefor.
(f) Consideration of motion amending Board act ion of July 12, 1978,
engaging the Southern California ·Coastal Water -Research Project
for services in connection with Districts 1 application for waiver
of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem fee basis,
and authorizing an increase in the maximum fee from $20,000 to
$2 7 ,500
(g) Consideration of Re s olution No. 79-17, approving and authorizing
e xecution of agreement with .. Oran ge County Water District relative
to data search to be performed by the Sanitation Districts in
connection with the existing Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water
Reuse Study; an d providing for reimbursement for data search costs
(h)
to the Districts. . See p a ge "I"
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-18, adopting prevailing wage
rates to be paid to all workers emp loyed on public works contracts
within the Districts, as determined by the Director of the State
A/C ... .TKLR~&..EL.
~~ Department of Industrial Relations. See page "J"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
@"):.~ ....... .
r.lE ·--·-/
®~
AfC •••. Tl<LR ----
f 1LE ··-·········bf ~-·-
A/C •••• TKLR ·-
FIL E •..•..............
LETTER .••.•.....•.•.
FILE ············--
LETTER (.~!°.S,_ ,/ Oi . ...,..,...
A/C .... TKLR -··
~~···········<l@ ~l.
A/C .... TKLR -
_,-··v.~.¥
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion approving value engineering for Solids
Handling and Dewatering Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-24, for a total outside professional
services cost not to exceed $40,400.00; and aut~orizing the staff
to engage the following individuals for professional services, on a
per diem fee basis according to their proposals, for a maximum
fee not to exceed the amounts indicated:
Tim Haug, PH.D.,P.E.
Engineering Science
Mark Butier, P.E.
Peter Barotti
Bill Hoagland, P .E .
Electrical Engineer (not
yet selected)
Maximum Fee
$3,500.00
9,950.00
9,950.00
7 , 000. 00 (not $9, 950)
5,000.00
5,000 .00
$40,400 .00 (not $43,350)
(j) Consideration of motion to receive, file .and deny claim of -
Robin M. Lee (contractor's employee), dated January 8, 1979,
in the amount of $10,000.00 in connection with construction
of Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No . I-IR,
and refer to contractor and Districts' liability claims
administrator-for -· appropriate action
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Kaspar G. Campbell, dated February 5, 1979, in the amount of
$485.96 for alleged damages to his vehicle, and -refer to the
Districts' liability claims administrator for ap·propriate action
DISTRICT 2
(1) Consideration ~of Resolution No. 79-2~-2, approving plans and
specifications for Olive ·Sub-Trw.nk -Repair, Contract No. 2-5R-l,
(Santa· Ana -River crossing), and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. Se e page "K"
(m) Consideration of Standard Resolution ·No. 79-24-2, ordering
annexation of 9 .892 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City
of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to
County Sani~ation District No. 2
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-25-2, approving and authorizing
execution of License Agreement with Los Ca ball e ros Racquet and
Sports Club, '.Ltd .. , et al. to occupy Districts' right of way for
the Santa Ana River Interceptor in th e vicinity of th e westerly
~iver bank, south of Warner, Contract No . 2-14-1. See page
"L"
(CONSENT CALENDA~ continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
FILE ................ .,
LETTER .....•.......•
A/C •... TKlR ....
u ' ..-FILE ···············-
Qt;.L-V LETTER1 ....•.•••••. -
A/C .@~
FILE ·······-··---~~~C..
LETTE~
A/C .... TKlR ·-
..
FILE ··t:~~C/
LETTER~
A/C .... TKLR ·-
FILE ················-
LETT ER···-······-
A/C .... TKLR '\::o
~---
--·--··········-·--
~---~-~---~
LETTER ···-··-·····
A/c lKLR •••• .... ../
(t!f~J
DISTRICT 3
(o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 4 to the
plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of
$7,2 15 .94 to the contract with Kordick a nd Rados, J.V. for
extra work required in connection with miscellaneous undisclosed
utility crossings and granting a time extension of three calendar
days for completion of said work. See page "M"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(p) Consideration of motion authori zing the staff to so licit
proposals for engineering services in connection with design
of the Santa Ana River Siphon,in accordance with the established
procedures for selection of professional engineering and
architectural services
DISTRICT 7
(q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 79-26-7, ordering
.833 acres of territory-xo the .District in the vicinit ~ northeast--
of Lomita Avenue and Santiago Boulevard, proposed Annexation
No. 69 -·liauser ·Annexation to County Sanitati-on "Distri·ct ·No. ·7
(r) Consideration of Standard Reso1ution No . 1 9-2 7 -7 , ordering
6 .216 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of
the northeast corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street
in the City of Orange, -proposed Annexation No. 8 1 -Tract
No. 9407 to County Sanitation Di strict No . 7
DISTRICT 11
(s)
(t)
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-28-11, authorizing filing fo r
Federal and State Grants £or Coast Highw ay Trunk Sewer, Portion
of Reach 1 and Reach -2 , and New l and--5:tre.et :Trunk .Sewer,-and
providing certain assurances :---See ·page ·11 N11
Con s ideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to
engage a r eal estate appraiser for appraisal of State Parks
and Beaches right of way in co nnection with con stru ction of
Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $2,000 .
END DF CONSENT CALEND~R
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5 -
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items relative to the Sewage Sludge Management
~ @ ility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange:
ti\ · qr~) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file status report
( ~"o 1~ of General Counsel re agreement with County of Orange for
r permit to conduct sewage solids processing and disposal
operation on County's Class II-2 landfill site. See
page "0"
FllE .................. f'
LETIE /~r~)
A/C ..•. lKl -
-·······-··--
FI LE ·······-··-···-
lffiER ···········-
A/C ... .lKLR -·
(c)
(d)
Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 on February 7, 1979,
directing the staff to prepare a negative declaration declaring
that the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill,
Irvine Area, County of Orange, will not have a significant effect
on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof
Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 1 to make a
negative declaration re Sewage Sludge Management Facility,
Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, on behalf
of itself a~d Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in accordance
with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, .as Amended
Roll Call Vote or Cast
~animous Ballot
(). _____ _
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-19, ·authorizing the General
Manager to award and execute contract for Interim Sludge Facility
Site Preparation at Coyo.te-.Cany on ·Landfi 11, .Job .. No. -PW-069, -with
John A. Artukovich Sons , Inc. i n the total amount -0f -$208,500.00,
subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of
Orange, General Services Agency, and solid waste discharge permit
from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved
by State Solid Waste Management Board; and rescinding Re s olution
~~-
A/C .•.. lKLR ··-
No. 78-197 re award of said job. See pages "P" and "Q" ~~-~ ~ ~·
f .o. ~;2}. ALL DISTRICTS
FI LE ················-ct\ \S ~-~
A/C .... l KLR ••.•
Consideration of motion approving ·Memorandum of Understanding-with
Orange County Employees ' Association re Oper.ations ~and_Maintenance
employees for the period December 29, 1978, through November 29, 1979
(See separate report mailed with agenda material -If any .Director
wishes to discuss this matter further, the Boards may convene in executive
session.)
(13) ALL -DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-20 relating to classi£ication,
Rolul Call Vote Bor11 c,ast compensation and terms of employment (incorporating-approved changes
nanimous a o \ '-
FILE -···············-N\\o with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolut-ions --in conflict
LETTER ···--····· therewith
~~~4) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No . 79-21 establishing rules and regulations
pertaining to conditions of emp loyment (incorporating approved changes ·tton -ca1r·vote-or Cost
Unanimous Ballot t\\\~ with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict
therewith
t R-------=~ ALL DISTRICTS
A/c TKLR __ / Status report
I .. ~ ··'-----------~~ ~---
of Special Committee to Study Reorganization of the Districts
-6-
(16) ALL DI STRI CTS
,,.. Other business and communications or s uppleme ntal a'genda i tern s, if any
(16-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Polyelectrolyte Chemical
Flocculent, Specification No. P-033 (Rebid), to American Cyanamid
for the unit price of $1.46 per pound, for a ma ximum amount ..not to
ITEMS ON
SUPPLE ME NTAL AGCNDA
fLE ~:=:-Ji\\~
~ --.v
exceed $87 ,089 .54, p l us applicab l e taxe s . See page "I"
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Tilomas M. Dawes ,
current l y an associate civil eng ineer with the County of Orange, as
A/C ... litKLR "j;>.>C,, 'O· , ·-/
~l~ Senior Engineer, Range 1061E, Step 2.5, ($12 .79/hr.) and accepting t r a n s f er
of 630 hours accumulated ·sick l e ave, not to excee d $8,057.70, to be
credited to this employee and utilized only wh e n earne d District
sick l eave is exhausted; and providing as a condition that no portion
of the transferred a ccumulated sick leave i s eligible for sick leave
payoff upon termination, death or retirement.
(17) DI?TRICT 1
o"t;~
(t8) DISTRICT 1
.~. _. Q J Consideration of motion to a djourn
~,~.the Orange County Transit District
~
(19) DISTRICT 3 ~~~
(20) DISTRICT 3
to 8:30 a .m., February 22, 1979, at
office ~·:~
or s uppl e mental agenda items, if ·any
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~-~
(21) Dl\STRICT 5 · Otb~r busine s s and c~a tions or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn <i(' . .3..Q)
(23) !STRICT 6
Other business-antl--c ~cations or s upplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 6
FiLE ···---·----~-Consideration of motion to adjourn ~:3-c ~~f.) •DISTRICT 7 .
A/C ···~ ~ Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any ~ lE (25-a) Consideration of motion to rece i ve and f i le request from Mr . & Mrs .
·--l~oN Daniel K. Walker for annexation of . 81 acres of territory to the
SUPPLEM ENTAL AGENDA Dis t rict in the vicinity near the intersection of Rancho Santiago
\ ~ and Equestrian Lane in unincorporated territory of the County of
f'I\ Orange; and refer to staff for study and reco mme nda~ion, proposed
Annexation No. 87 -Walker Annexation to County Sa ntation District
No. 7 . See page "II"
.(26) DISTRICT 7
. Con s ideration of motion to ad journ ~:_;t
........ ~t ions or s upp-re'mental agenda i tems, i f a ny
(28) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to a?j ourn ~~ .3 I
-7-
··-
(29) DISTRICT 2
Further consideration of request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection
fees for a 30-unit low-cost housing project in the City of Brea (continued ·
from January 10th meeting): See page "R"
~v ~-= (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, supporting
the District's Connection a nd Use Ordinance
of sewer connection fees for projects being
letter from City of
a motion to amend
to permit a waiver
constructed on \~1~
municipally-owned land. See page "S"
(30)
~~r/'
A/C •••• TKLR ••.•
\, (b)
(Y\~~
Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General
Counsel re Possible Alternative Provisions of Ordinance
Amendments re Waiver of Connection Fees. See page "T"
@ Discussion (R_.~ ~s) r~ 1, ~~ \-11-1q.,~-1 ~-'>'t)
\@ Consideration of action on request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of
connection fees
DISTRICT 2
(a)
(®
@)
.Consideration -of motion -to receive ~and -£ile ~letter £rom -Ci~y :of u7
Anaheim, dated January 25, 1979, requesting waiver of connection
fees· for the ·Addition ·to Anaheim ·stadium and the ·Anaheim Convention · -
Center. See page "U"
Di scussion
Consideration of action on request ~o£ City of Anaheim :::for ·waiver
of co nn ection f ees
(31) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or s uppl ~mental agenda items ; if a ny -
(32) DISTRICT 2
Con sideration ·of motion to adjourn q_!. 9'D
-8 -
,1
II
-r
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County S11nit11tion Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Or11nge County, C11lifornla l 0844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540·2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
FEBRUARY 14',, 1979 -7: 30 p IM I
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM,, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITION,, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AJ /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
( 4) Recognition of s_pecia l gues ts
ALL OTSTRICTS ,, if any
(5)
IT!'/.'.S ON
5UPPlEIALl'l!Al AGtNDA
ConsiC:cration of motion to receive and fi l e minut.e excerpt from
the Board of Supervise-rs showine appointment of Director and
a l ternates to serve on the Districts ' Boards as follows:
(7)
Director District Al ternate
Philip L. Anthony Thomas F. Riley
2 Ralph B. Cl ark (Actjvc)
3 Harriett Wi eder (Active)
5 Ti iomas F. Riley (A ct:i ve)
"6 TI1omas F. Riley
7 Ralph B. Clark {Active)
11 Harriett Wieder {A ct ive)
District 5 -January 10, 1979, regular, and
January 23, 1979, adjourned
District 6 -January
District 7 -January
District ll -January
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a)
(b)
(c) Ge neral Counsel
10, 1979, regular
10, 1979, regular
10, 1979, regular
lg meetings,
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
ROL L Ci\LL VOTE •...•• -~.-h . . d . d. . d l D. . f 11 (E h D. h 11 t e Joint an 1n 1v1 ua 1str1cts as o ows: ac 1rector s a
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DI STRICT NO . 2 See page (s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO . 3 See page (s) "B II and
DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s)
DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
I
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS I 9 (A) THROUGH 9 ( T )
All matt~rs placed upon ~he consent cal endar are -considered
a~ not requiring discussion or further exp lan ation and
unless any particular item is requested to b e removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of the se items . All items on the consent c a lendar
will be enacted by one action a pproving all motions, and
casting a una nimous b a llot for resolutions .inc luded on the
con sent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
sha ll be considered in the regu lar·order of business.
.tl'f:At of the public who wish to remove an item from the
rs~ #9 calendar shall, upon recogni tion by the chair, state
.t '/:' l,r-(bj address and designate by lett er th e item to be l'.c-"~ ~ l'""' J;o +. he '7 ·~: h consent calendar . M 1119 .{> p ~c-
ol'f: r~J ..f>oAt -1>c-Ato * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CoR~ SJ>R.tc /)"lsc'/~b p
cl'.to -Q:-4' /:' "1.1, ~ ..f>oAt <: any i terns are to be deleted from ~ 0'11 ~oAt .lub1i Co.-v ·
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimo us Ballot
.t~ "lee-. r.tc ~~.tl'
Con!>_ ~ #. :i\tb1 .t,,y b C"l.<, ~ 11 agenda i terns a ppearing
on the ..... 9
(-i)· • '.(~ ~'1tb 'v r emove d from same. . CJ>o ~.{> ~s,·
Atl'c
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motio~ approving Addendum No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Installation of Gas Engines
with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station,
Job No. J-3-1, changing the time required for completion
from 300 to. 360 calendar days, including a Guarantee Form
in the specifications and making a technical c l arification
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-14, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommend a tion and awarding contract for
Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock
Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-3-1, to Pascal & Ludwig,
I nc. in the amount of $24 7, 225 . 00. See pages "E" and
\}iV "F"
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
issue a purchase order contract to Cooper Energy Services for
maintenance work on White Superior gas engines purchased for
installation at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station (Job No . J-3-1)
for a total amount not to exceed $10,000 .00
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79 -15, approving plans and
specifications for Fire Sprinkling System for Existing Warehouse
at Plant No. 1, Job No. -PW-070, and authorizing the General
Manager to estab lish the date for receipt of bids. See
page "G"
of Resolution .No. 79-16, accepting Digester Gas
Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF,
as complete; authorizing exec ce of Completion; and
approving Final Closeout Agreement therefor .. ee
(f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of July 12, 1978,
engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver
of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem fee basis,
and authorizing an increase in the maximum fee f rom $20,000 to
$27,500
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-17, approving and authorizing
execution of agreement with Orange County Water District relative
to data search to be performed by the Sanitation Districts in
connection with the existing Or a nge and Los Angeles Counties Water
Reuse Study; and providing for reimbursement for data search costs
to the Districts. See page "I"
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-18, adopting prevailing wage
rates to be paid to all workers employed on public works contracts
within the Districts, as d etermined by the Di r ector of the State
Department of Industrial Relations. See page "J"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR c ontinued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Co n sideration of motion approvin g value engineering for Solids
Handling and Dewatering Faci lities for 75 MGD Improved Tr eatment
at P lant No . 2, Job No. P2 -24, for a total outside professional
ser vices cost not to exceed $40,400 .00 ; a nd authorizing the s t aff
to engage the fo l lowing individua l s for professional services , on a
per die m fee b as i s according to their proposals, for a max imum
fee not to exceed the amount s indica ted:
Tim Haug, PH .D.,P.E.
En gin eerin g Sc i ence
Mark Butier, P.E .
Peter Barotti
Bill Hoag l and, P.E.
Electrical En gineer (not
yet se l ect e d)
Maximum Fee
$3 ,500 .00
9 ,950 .00
9,950.00
7, 000 . 00 (not $9, 950)
5,000.00
5,000 .00
$40,400 .00 (not $43,350)
(j ) Consideration of motion t o -r eceive, file and deny claim of
Robin M. Lee (contractor 's employee), dated January 8, 19 79 ,
in the amoun t of $1 0,000.00 in connection with construction
of Re h abilita tion of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No . I -lR,
and refer to contractor a nd Districts' liab ili t y c l aims
administrator -for appropriat e action
(k) Consideration of mo tion to receive , file and deny claim of
Kaspar G. Campbell, dated February 5, 19 79 , in the amo unt of
$485.96 for alleged dam ages -to his vehicle, a nd r efer to the
Di s tricts ' liabi l ity c l aims adm ini strator fo r ap·propriate action
DISTRICT 2
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-23-2 , approving p l ans -an d
specifications for Olive Sub -Trunk Re pair , Contract No. 2 -5R-l,
(Santa· Ana ·River crossin g), and authorizing the General Manager to
estab lish the date for receipt of bids . See page "K"
(m) Co n sideration of Standard Res olution No. 79-24 -2, ordering
annexation of 9.892 acr es of territory to the District in the -
vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City
of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract ~o. 1016 7 to
Co unty Sanit ation Dl strict No. 2
(n) Consideration of Resol u tion No . 79-25-2, approving a nd authorizin g
execut ion of License Agreeme nt with Los Caballeros Racq u et and
Sports Club, Ltd . ., et a l. to occupy Districts ' right of way for
the Santa Ana River Interceptor in t~e vicinity of the westerly
iriver bank, south of Warner, Contract No . 2-14-1. See page
"L"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 3
(o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, a portion of
Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of
$7,215.94 to the contract with Kordick and Rados, J.V. for
extra work required in connection with miscellaneous undisclosed
utility crossings and granting a time extension of three calendar
days for completion of said work. See page "M"
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(p) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit
proposals for engineering services in connection with design
of the Santa Ana River Siphon,in accordance with the established
procedures for selection of professional engineering and
architectural services
DISTRICT 7
(q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-26 -7, ordering
.833 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity nQrtheast
of Lomita Avenue and Santiago Boulevard, proposed Annexation
No. 69 -Hauser Annexation ·to County ·Sanitation District No. 7
(r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 79-27-7, ordering
6.216 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of
the northeast corner of Randall Street anq Kennymead Street
in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract
No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7
DISTRICT 11
(s) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-28-11, authorizing filing for
Federal and State Grants for Coast ·Highway TrunK Sewer, Portion
of Reach 1 and-Reach-2, and New l and Street Trunk Sewer, and
providing certain assurances. See. page -"N"
(t) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to
engage a real estate appraiser for appraisal of State Parks
and Beaches right ·of way i n connection with construction of
Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $2,000.
END -OF CONSENT -CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-5 -
>
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items relative to the Sewage Sludge Management
Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file status r eport
of General Counsel re agreement with County of Orange for
p ermit to conduct sewage solids processing and disposal
operntion on County's Class II-2 l andfill site. See
page "0"
(b) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 on February 7, 1979,
directing the staff to prepa re a negative declaration declaring
that the Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote Canyon Landfill,
Irvine Area, County of Orange, will not have a significant effect
on the environment, and directing filing of notice thereof
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 1 to make a
negative declaration re Sewage Sludge Management Facility,
Coyot e Canyon Landfill, Irvine Area, County of Orange, on behalf
of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in accordance
with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 79-19, authorizing the General
Manager to award and execute contract for Interim Sludge Facility
Roll Call vote or cast Site Preparation at Coyote Canyon Landfill, Job No. PW-069, with
Unanimo us Ballot John A. Artu kovich Sons, -Inc. in the t ota l amount of $208,500 .00,
subject to receipt of executed land use agreement with County of
Orange, General Services Agency, a n d solid waste discharge permit
from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement Agency, as approved
by State Solid Waste Management Board; and rescinding Resolution
No. 78-197 re award of said job. -See pages -"P" and "Q"
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(13)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Un animous Ballot
(14)
Roll Col: !Jo1e or Co1t
Unanimous Ballot
(15)
Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Und erstanding with
Orange County Employees' Association re Operations and Maintenance
employees for the period December 29, 1978; through November 29, 1979
(See separate report mailed with agenda material -If any Director
wishes to discuss this matter further, the Boards may convene in executive
session.)
ALL -DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-20 relating to classification,
compensation and terms of employment (incorporating approved changes
with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict
therewith
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 79-21 establishing rules and regulations
pertaining to conditions of employment (incorporating approved changes
with all employee units) and rescinding previous resolutions in conflict
therewith
ALL DISTRICTS
Status report of Special Committee to Study. Reorganization of the Districts
( .}
t;, Jo ,
~ f _L ~ l ~t ~l (\}~) IJ
-6-
.-(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any
(16-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Polyelectrolyte Che mical
Flocculent, Specification No. P-033 (Rebid), to American Cyanamid
for the unit price of $1.46 per pound, for a maximum amount ..not to
exceed $87 ,089. 54, plus applicable taxes. See page "!"
ITEMS OH
SUPPLEMENTAL A_GENDA
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of 'Iflomas M. Dawes,
currently an associate civil engineer with the County of Orange, as
Senior Engineer, Range 1061E, Step 2.5, ($12.79/hr.) and accepting transfer
of 630 hours accumulated ·sick leave, not to exceed $8,057 .70, to be
credited to this employee and utilized only when earned District
sick leave is exhausted; and providing as a condition that no portion
of the transferred accumulated sick leave is eligible for sick leave
payoff upon termination, death or retirement .
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other bus i ness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 8:30 a.m., February 22, 1979, at
the Orange County Transit District office ~-/
(19) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications · or suppleme ntal agenda items, ~f any
(20) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~'.> v
(21) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23 ) DI STRICT 6
Other business and communications --0r suppleme ntal agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn i};.,_.
(25) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any
(25-a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Mr. & Mrs.
Daniel K. Walker for annexation of .81 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity near the intersection of Rancho Santiago
and Equestrian Lane in unincorporated territory of the County of
Orange; and refer to staff for study and r e comm e ndation, proposed
Annexation No. 87 -Walker Annexation to County Santation District
ITEMS OH
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
(26)
(2 7)
(28)
No. 7. See page "II"
DISTRICT 7
. Consideration of motion to adjourn \{;~)
DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or s uppl emental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 11 ~
Con s ideration of motion to adjourn ~ ..,
-7-
. ,,
(29) DISTRICT 2
(30)
Further consideration of request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of connection
fees for a 30 -un it low-cost housing project in the City of Brea (continued
from January 10th meeting): See page "R"
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from City of
Anaheim , dated January 25, 1979, supporting a motion to amend
the District's Connection and Use Ordinance to permit a waiver
of sewer connection fees for projects being constructed on
municipally-owned land . See page 11 s 11
(b) Consideration of motion to rec eive and file report of General
Counsel re Possible Alternative Provisions of Ordinance
Amendments re Waiver of Connection Fees. See page "T"
(c) Discussion
(d) Consideration of action on request of Breal, Inc. for waiver of (
connection fees ~ l · ( cP ~ 6
4 /. t._!tt.' . t~, 4 , -t~ ,e,. (t."-' .uLv.. ). -1 'i)•,...... '
( 1\ .. CT\,~~('..M (\~ ) .... ;. . ···'f'",'-' l'tJ ':"~L Wt DISTRICT 2 IJ ( I '; ·~ c J j.( ~ I ~ / r• j,. ... ' '-"~ f# · .• J>) ~
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and .file .letter _£ram City of ...
Anaheim, dated January 25, 19 79, requesting waiver of connection
fees for the Addition ·to Anaheim ··Stadiuni ~and the 'Anaheim -<:onvention . -... -
Center. See page 11 0 11
(b) Discussion
( c) Consideration of action -on request· of City ·of Anaheim -for ·wai vet ·---
of connection fees
(31) DISTRICT 2
(32)
Other business and conununications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if any
DISTRICT .2 r
Cons'idera·tion of motion to adjourn rl
-8-
/, (J
~c, > !"....,_:..
L"
( --
;&
' '
(
(
.~-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
:; County Sanita ti o n Dist ric ts
of O range Cou nty, Cal ifornia
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLE MEN TAL AGENDA ITEMS
FEB RUARY 14) 1979 -7:30 P.M.
AL L DISTRICTS
Post Ottico Bo x 812 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Cal if., 92708
T elephones :
Are o Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(5) Con sideration of motion to receive and fil e minute excerpt fr om
the Board of Sup e rvisors show i ng appointment of Director and
a lte rnates to serve on the Districts ' Boards as follows:
Director Distri ct Alternat.e
Philip L. Ant hony 1 Th omas F. Riley
2 Ralph B. Cl ark (Active)
3 Harriett Wieder (Ac t ive)
5 1110mas F. Riley (A ctive)
6 Th omas F. Riley
7 Ra lph B. Cl ar k (A ctjve )
11 Harriett Wieder (Active )
(16 -a) Consideration of motion to receive and fil e bid tabulation and
recommendation a nd awarding purchase of Po lye l ectrolyte Chem:ical
Flocculent, Sp ecification No . P-033 (R e bid ), to Ame rican Cyanamid
for t h e unit price of $1 .46 per pound, for a maximum amount not to
excee d $87,089 .5 4 , plus applicable taxes . See page "I"
DISTRICT 7
(25-a) Consid eration of motion t o receive an d fil e r e quest from Mr. & Mrs.
Daniel K. Wa l ker for annexat j on of .8 1 acres of territory to the
Di strict in the vicinity n ear the i ntersect i on of Rancho Santi ag o
and Equestrian Lan e in unincorporat e d t e rrit ory of the County of
Or ange; an d refer to staff for study and r ec ommendation, propo s ed
Ann exation No . 87 -Walker Annexation to County S~rntation Di stri ct
No. 7. See page "II"
•
II I II
B I D T A B U L I\ T I 0 N
S H E E T
SPE<;IFIC/\'J'ION NO. P-033 -Rcbj d
.PROJECT TI'I'LE Pol ye 1 ect rolytc Chcm:i ca l Fl oc:cul cnt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PHOJ ECT DESCRIPTION furnish Po l ye J ect rol yte 01cmical Floccul ent for 12 to 18
month s per Spec . P-033 condit i ons .
ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE $ 120,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 4 20, 000
~~~~~~~~~
REMARKS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BIDDER LBS UNIT TOTAL BID
1. 59, 4 00 1.46 $ 87,089.54
American Cyanamid 913, 846 @ 6.5% Solids 0.0953 $ 87,089.54
2. 64, 35 0 l. 78· $114,5 43.00
CaJgon Corp. l,072',500 @ 6.0% Solids 0.1068 $l14,543.00
3.
Allied Colloids 62;250 l. 93 $125,932.50
lj .
Hercul es Inc. . 77, 85 0 2.24 $174,384.00
5.
6.
7.
8.
10 .
AGE~DA ITEM ~16(A) .~LL DISTRICTS II I II
"II"
''[XH IB IT A II
PETITI ON FOR ANN EXATION
Date: February 9 , 1979
To: Bo a rd of Directors
County Sa ni ta tion Di str i c t No . 7
P.O. Bo x 8 1 27
Fountain Va lley, Cl\ 92 708
't
It i s he r eby r equ es ted t ha t t he t e rr i tory ge ne ra ll y des crib ed as (indicate
ar ea des cr i ption a nd/or ad j acent str eet in ter sect i on -Exa mpl e : in the city
of Oran ge , nea r the inter sec ti on of Chapm an Ave nue a nd Sa ntia go Boulevard).
11 072 Rancho Santiago Boul eva rd, in th e unin corp orated a r ea of t he Coun ty
of Or a nge , near t he int er secti on of Ra nc ho Sa nti aoo a nd Eques tr i a n La ne .
and mor e pa rti c ularly descr i bed and shown on th e lega l des cr i pti on a nd map
enclo sed he r ew ith which has be en pr e pa r ed in a ccordance wi t h the Distr ic t 's
ann exati on pr oc edures , be annex ed t o the Di s t r i ct.
Th e fol l owi ng i nformation i s al so s ubm i tted herewith i n connection with thi s
r equ es t for annexat ion:
Pro pert y Owner (I f mo r e t han on e , a t t ach sep ar a t e listi ng )
Name : Mr . & Mr s . Dani e l K. Wa l ker
Addr ess : 12229 De l /\mo Blv d .
~~--~~----~~~~-~~--
City & St ate : Cer ri t os , Ca l i fo rni a 9 0701
Te l ep hon e No .: (213 ) 860-1231
Gross Ac rea ge : 0 .8 1
~-~~~~-~-
(to nea r est hundr edt h )
As sessed Value (I f mo r e t ha n one par cel , attac h s epa r ate li st ings)
$64 70 .00
Number of Reg i s te r ed Vo ters : 2 -----
Al so e nc l osed i s the Ini t i a l Stu dy form required by the Loca l Agen cy Fo r mation
Co mm i ssion (a nd a n Env ironme ntal lmpact Report if pr ep ar ed). Also a ch eck i n
th e amount of $500 .00 r e r rc se nt in g t he Di str i c t 's pr0c e ss ing f ee i s inclu ded
her cv!i t h. ·
Si gJlure of Property Own er(s ) ~·l/5.~Mkv lfJ~uJ~a--~V&-~-
.~GE(lD .~ ITEM 1~25 ( t-J -DISTRICT 7 "J I"
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT ~ A
County Sanitat ion Districts
of Oran ge Coun ty, California
JO IN T BO AR~S
Meeting Date
Februa r y 14, 1979 -7:30 p .m.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Te lephones:
Arco Code 7 I 4
540-2910
962-2411
The f ollowing is a brief exp l a n ation o f the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclo s ed agenda and wh ich
are not otherwis e self-explanatory . Warrant li sts are enclosed
with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last
Joint Board meeting .
To minimize the am ount of.redundancy a n d dup li ca tion in the
a g end a mate rial and r educe the number o f comm ents i n the Mana g e r's
Report , we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the
ag enda itself , particularly with regard to c han g e orders and con-
tracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract
budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed ch a nge ord e rs a re i nclude d
in the supporting material as wel l as the b id t abul at ions for the
contra cts being r ecomm e nded for awar d.
J oint Boards
No . 9-a -Approving Addendum No . 2 to 'Joh No'. ·J-3-1.
The staff is requesting approva l of th is addendum which extends
the time fo r compl~tion of the proj ec t from 300 to 360 days, as we ll
a s making a t echnical cha nge to the specific a tions for the Instal-
l ation of Gas Engines with Gear Dr ive s at Ro throck Outfall Booster
Sta tion.
No . 9-b -Awar d of Job No. J-3-1 -Ins t a ll ation of Gas Engines
at Rothr~ck Outfall Bo oster Station .
Bids were rece ived for the installation of t hr ee Districts'
own ed gas engines and g ear drives a t the Ro t hrock Outfall Booster
Station . Bid proposals from four contractor s rang ed from a hi gh
of $349,500 to a low of $247 ,225 . The staff has discussed the scope
of th e work with the contractor submitt i n g t h e lowest bid and he
h as indica ted that in r evi ewing his prices a n d confirmations of
material costs in prep a ring his bid p r oposal, that an erro r of
$1 8 ,000 was ma de in t he quotation received f rom one of the eng ine
suppliers of required p a rts . This morning , Pascal & Ludwig , Inc.,
of Upl a nd, California, who submitted t he lo west bid , indicated in
a telephone conversa t ion with staff that th e y may request to be a l lowed
to withdraw th e ir bid propo s al. This it e m will be discus s ed in de -
tail at the Board meeting . The e n g ineer's e s timate for this work
is $479,922 .
No. 9-c -White Superior En g ine Maintenance Work.
Two of the thr ee engines to be insta lled in the Rothrock
Outfall Pump Station under Job No. J-3-1 were purch ase d by the Dis -
tricts some time ago as "used equipment " as they had been previously
sold and s hipp ed to a customer but never installed or operated. The
Districts purchased these eng ine s for $5 5,45 0 each . (A bid of
$76,318 was received a t the same time for a "new" engine of com -
parable hors e power).
Since these engines were stored f o r over t wo years, it was
recognized th a t some clean up and refurbishin g wou l d be required
prior to insta l l ation . The staff is r ecommending that the loc a l
office of Cooper En erg y S erv i~es (The White Sup erior Dealer) be
engaged to perform this necessary work on a per diem basis for an
estimated cost of $5 ,000 per E'ngine, not to exceed $10,000 for both
eng i nes.
No. 9 -d -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Job PW -070
Fire Spri nkling Sy stem for Existing Warehouse.
Last June, bids were received for add itions to the warehouse,
including the installation of a fire s p rinkling s ystem i n the exist-
i ng warehouse as required by the City of Fountain Valley Building
Code . The bids receive d were in excess of the engineer's estimate
and all bids were rejected and the staff was instructed to revise
the p l ans to minimize costs and to rebid the project during a more
competitive bid p eri od .
Job PW -070 separates the fire sprinkler system for the existing
warehouse as a single contract , thereby el i minating the sub contractor
r e l ationship on the future warehouse expansion. The staff recommends
appr oval of the plans and spec i fications and that the date to receive
bids be established as Tuesday, March 27. The engineer's estimate
for this project is $19,000.
No. 9-e -Acceptirig Job J-6-lF as Comp l ete.
I n December, the Board accepted the bid submitted by Caligua,
I nc., in the amo u nt of $20,467 for the installation of the s l udge
gas p i ping required to supply the digester gas fuel to the engine
units at the Foster Outfall Booster Stat ion . The contractor has
d i ligently prosecuted the work in record t ime without any change
orders to the contract . The staff r ecommends acceptance of the work,
approval of the Fina l Closeout Agreement, and authorization to
execute the Notice of Completion.
No. 9-f -Amendin~ Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project Authorization in Conn e ct ion with Wa i ver Appl ication .
Last July , the Boards accepted the proposal from SCCWRP to
perform nece ssary services required in connection with the prepara -
tion of the appLication f6r wa iver of secondary treatment as r equired
-2 -
-
by the EPA. It was ant i c ip ated that the fed era l requir eme nts wou ld
be publishe d before the due date of Septemb er 24 , 1 978 , but it
appears now that the fina l regulations will no t be pub li she d in the
Feder a l Re g ister until mi d -March . One of the repo rting requirements
c ontained in the waiver applicat ion regulations is an analys i s of
the Districts ' influents and effluents of th e 65 identified toxi -
c ants . The samplin g must be done to reflect b oth dry weather flows
and wet weather flows . Anticipating that the appli c ation would be
submit ted prior to the rainy season, SCCWRP was not requested to
provide information regarding the wet weather flows. Now that we
a r e in the rainy season, this information should be included i n the
application fo r waiver for secondary treatmen t requirements .
Th e. staff recommends a n amendme nt to the previous agreement with
SCCWRP to provide the wet weather sampling and ana ly ses in an amount
not to exceed $7 ,500.
No . 9-g -Water Reuse Study.
The District is a member a gency in the Orange/Los Ange les Counties
Water Reuse Study, which involves the six major wa ter (potable and
wastewater) agencies in this area, and is ·funded to 87% by the Fe deral
a n d State Grant Programs. A s ubstantia l por tion of the data needed
f or this study can be obtained from the agencies involved under a
r eimbursement provision set forth in the grant cf fer and the Joint
Powers Agreement . The San itation Dis tricts ' share of this work is
quit e small and the staff is reconunending that we enter into a sub-
a greement with the Orange County Water Distri ct for us to perform
and be reimburs ed for approximate l y $10,200 o f force-account work
required by the study.
No . 9-h -Ado pting Preva iling Wage Rates f o r Public Works
Con tracts.
Th e resolution appearing in the agenda material adopts prevail -
ing wage rates to be paid workers employed o n public works contracts
as determined by the Director of the State De partment of Industrial
Re lations . To comply with S ta te and Federa l requirements, the Dis -
tricts must establish prevailing rates once each year .
No . 9-i -Value Eng ine erin , Soli ds Handlin.
F acilit i es for 75-m d Improved Treatment at l? ant
E stimate Project Cost, ~12. ion.
F edera l re gul ations r equire that all grant projects that cost
in excess of $10 million include va l ue engin e ering (VE) procedures .
This requirement is to ensure that the facil i ties are constructed
in accorddnce with the best avai lable techno l ogy using money -saving
construction procedures. Th e value eng ineering study that was per -
formed on the 75-mgd of Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 resulted
in about $1 million savings of a total contra ct of approximately
$L~6 million.
-3-
A two-phase procedure for value eng ineerin g of the design of
the solids handling and dewatering facilities h as been developed
for the Boards' approva l. Pha se I will evaluate the siting, pro-
cess design, and the propo s ed equipment, and Phase II will eva luate
actual desig n, construction and ease of operation and maintenance.
These phases wi ll be eva luated separately , at different time inter-
vals, and will involve two value engineering teams. The tea ms will
b e comprised of profes siona l s , most with previous VE experience
and three members of the Staff 's staff. In accordance with the
Boards ' selection procedures, it is hereby recorrnnended that the
Directors approve the consultants ' proposals for the grant fundable
value engineering team efforts as follows:
Engineering Science, Inc. Phases I &
Mark Butier, P.E. Phases I &
Pete Barotti Phases I &
Tim Haug, Ph.D. I P.E. Phase I
Bill Hoagland, P.E. Phase II
Electrical En g ineer
(Not yet selected) Phase II
TOTAL
No. 9-j & k -Cl a ims Against the Districts.
II
II
II
$9,950
$9,950
$7,000
$3,500
$5,000
$5,000
40,400
We h ave received two cla im s against the Districts which we
recorrnne nd the Boards deny an d refer to the contractor's and the
Districts' liability a dmini str ator .
District No. 2
No. 9-1
of Olive
A for Re lacement
During the period of hig h runoff c a used by the h eavy rains l ast
year, the Olive and Orange Subtrunks cros sing the Santa Ana River
were undermined and d a ma ged , necessitating replacement of these
crossings.
The Directors wi ll reca ll that the Orange Subtrunk was replaced,
on an emergency basis, a nd put ba ck into operation within two weeks
after the sewer was d amage d causing r aw sewa ge flows in the Santa
Ana River. However, flows in the Oliv ~ Subtrunk were diverted to the
Santa Ana River Inter ceptor and did not require replacement on an
emergency basis. Repl accme n~ of t h e Olive Subtrunk at the Katella
crossing o f ·the Santa Ana Rive r was d efe rred in order that con -
struction could comm e nc e after April 15, thereby avoiding the rainy
neason and the runoff f lows i n the Santa Ana River .
-4-
P l ans an d s pecifi ca tion s for this rep l aceme nt h ave b e en pre-
pared and are r ead y t o so licit c o n s truc tion bids. Th e e n g in e er 's
estimate for t hi s projec t i s $17 3 ,000, ap prox im ate l y 50% of th e
c o s t wi l l b e re i mburse d b y the F eder a l Di sas ter F un d a s the y wi l l
onl y fun d r eplacemen t in k ind. P l a n s a nd s pe c ificat ions f or this
repl acement spec ify lower ing o f t h e sewer c r os sin g of the Sa n ta
An a Rive r t o avoi d fu t u re d a ma ge b y h eavy s torm runo f f .
No . 9-m -Order in g Annexation No . 30 -Tra ct 101 67 .
Th e Local Agency Formation Commiss i o n has appr ove d th e Board's
r equest for annexat i on of th i s 9 .892 annexat i on l ocated i n t he Ci ty
of Anaheim in the vicinity of Countr y Hil l Road and Mohle r Dr i ve .
Th e p roponents of this deve l opment have pai d a l l the requi red fees
a n d the staff recommend s a d o p tion o f Resolu t ion No. 79 -24-2 order-
ing said annexat i on which i s in con f orma n c e with t he Distr ict's
Mas t e"!." P l a n.
No. 9 -n -Authorizing Execution o f L i c e nse Agreemen t to Occupy
Santa Ana River Inte rcept or Sewer Right of Way .
Th e Los Caba ll eros Sp ort s & Rac q uet Cl ub , Inc., F o un ta i n Va l ley ,
h as requested permission to e n croach on the District 's 3 0' easement
t o insta ll tennis courts and wooden b leachers for a so cc e r field .
Th e staff has carefully reviewed the Racquet Club 's proposal and
finds that it will not interfere with the normal operation of the
Di strict's trunk sewer. The staff i s recounne nding the approval of
a Li cense Agreement , in form approved by the General Counsel, to be
executed by the Rac quet Club allowing surface use of the easement
r i ght of way, holding the District harmless a nd the Racquet Club
wi ll be responsib l e for remova l of any improvements to b e c on -
stru cted thereon.
Distric t No . 3
No. 9-o -Change Orde r No . 4 -Contract No. 3 -20-3 .
Ko r dick & Rados , the jo i nt ventu re con tractors cons t ructing
th e por t ion of the Knott Avenue I nterceptor f rom Linco l n Avenue to
Or angeth orpe Avenue have encou ntered several u ti l ity i n terferences
which were not de l ineated on the construction plans . These uti li ties
wh ich the contractor e ncountered where addi t iona l costs were incu rred
were water l ines , fire lines and traffi c sign al conduits . The staff
r ecommends approval of Change Orde r No . 4 , an addition to the c on-
t ract of $7,215 .94 .
Distri cts Nos. 5 & 6
No . 9-p -Soliciting Eng ineering Propo sa l s for the Design of
Santa Ana River Sipho n .
Th e Coun ty Flood Contro l District i s planning the widen i n g o f
-5-
the Santa Ana River adjacent to Plant No. 2. The portion adjacent
to the Plant will be deferred because of environmenta l h earings
required by the Endangere d Species Act. To minimize the cost on
the second barrel of the Sa n ta Ana River siphon, construction should
be concurrent with the Flood Control District 's widening program,
therefore the staff is reques ting solicitation of proposals for
engineering services in connection with this desi gn. The staff,
acting at the Board 's dir ec tion, has secured an approve d Coasta l
Commission permit for this project . Solicitation of proposals
for design will be don e in accordance with the Di stric t procedures
for the selection of professional engineering services.
District 7
lol\
No. 9-q -Ordering Ann exa tion No. }9_, -Hauser Annexation .
Th e Local Agency Formation Commission has approved the B8ard's
request to annex this .833 acre parcel in the unincorporated terri-
tory in the vicinity of Santiago Boulevard and Lomita Avenue . The
proponents have paid all th e necessary fees for this s ingle-family
deve lopment which i s in conformity with the District's Master Plan .
Th e staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No . 79 -26 -7
ordering this a nnexation.
No. 9-r -Orderin·g Annexa tion No. 8 1 -Tract 9407.
This proposed annexat ion is 6.216 acres located in the City
of Orange and has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Com-
mis sion . The proponents have paid all the f ees on this annexat ion
for the development of eight singl e -family residences, which is in
conformity with the Di s trict's Master Plan. The staff recommends
adoption of Resolution No . 79-27-7 ordering this annexation.
District 11
No. 9-s -Authori z ing Filing for Federal and State Grants for
Coast Highway Trunk Sewer .
The staff has submitted to the State Water Resources Control
Board .Pre liminary docume ntation requesting gran t assistance on the
construction of the Co as t Highway Trunk Sewer from Treatment P l ant
No . 2 to Lake Street . inclu<lirnt the New l a nd Street Trunk Sewer from
the Coast Highway to the in terse ction of New l and a nd Hamilton Stree ts .
Th e State staff h as r eviewed the District 's submittal and fee ls that
a grant could be offered for this proiect . The staff is. therefore.
requesting consideration of Res olution No. 79-28-11 authorizing the
filin g of the nec essarv documentation for a Federal a nd State grant
for this Coast Highway Tr unk Sewer.
No. 9 -t -Authorizing the Ge n e ral Counsel to En g age Real Estate
Appraiser in Connection with the Coast Hi ghway Trunk Sewer.
Much of th e Coast Hi g hwa y Trunk Sewer will be built in the State
-6-
-
P arks a nd Bea c hes p r o perty s outh er l y o f the Pac ific Coas t Hig h wa y .
The State h as ind i cated tha t an easemen t wou l d be granted to t h e
Di strict f or cons i deration of connec ting the fac il ities l ocat e d in
th e State P ark . The State h as r equested an apprai sal of t h e ri gh t of
way in o rder t h at the sewer e asement c a n be iss u ed to the Di s t r i c t .
Th e sta f f i s r eq u est ing t hat t h e Ge n e r a l Counse l b e a uthor i zed
to engage a r ea l es t ate appraiser fo r thi s pur pose i n a n amoun t not
to excee d $2,000.
All Dis t ric t s
No. 1 1 -Status Report Relative to the Sewage Sludge Management
Facility -Coyote Canyon Landfill.
Last week, the Genera l Counse l and a staff member appeared before
the Solid Wastes Management Board in Sacramento rel ative to our pend -
ing appl i cation to dispose of processed solids at the Coyote Canyon
landfill. A report from the General Counsel i s included in the agenda
supporting material. As a r esu l t of t h e Sacramento meetings, the
Genera l Counsel recommends that the Districts proceed immediately
with the a doption of a Negative Dec laration in accordance with the
CEQA requirements. District No . 1 met Wednesday morning, February
7 th , to instruct the staff to prepare a Negative Declarat ion for
their consideration on Thursday, February 22nd . Action on I tems 11-b
and 11-c will authorize District 1 to act on behalf of itself and the
other Districts. Since it appears that the County Supervisors will
approve the agreement with the Districts for the solids processing
and sludge operations at the County landfi l l site on February 20th,
and the State Solid Wastes Board will act on the 23rd fo l lowing the
adoption of a Negat ive Declaration, it is the staff's recommendation
that Resolution No . 79-19 (A genda Item 11-d) be approved authorizing
the General Manager to awa rd and exec ute a contract for Job PW-069
for the site preparation in the total amount of $208,500, subject to
the approvals of the agreement with the County and the Sol i d Waste
Enforcement Agency.
No . 1 2 -Emp l oyee Ne go tiations.
A Memorandum of Und erstanding has been executed with repre -
sentatives of the Operat ions and Maintenance employee unit . A separate
confid e nt i a l report is included in the agenda materi a l for all active
Directors .
Nos . 1 3 & 14 -Oper at ions and Maintenance Employee Unit Com-
pens at ion and Benefits .
In the even t the Memorandum of Und ers tanding with the Operations
and Maintena nc e em ployees is validated by the Districts 1 Boards of
Directors , Resolutions Nos . 79 -20 and 79-2 1 implement the conditions
agreed to in the MOU.
-7-
No. 15 -Status Report re Special Committee to Study Re -
or gani zation .
Ch a irman Smith will repor t to th e Directors as to the status
of t he Committee's di sc u ssions . The Comm ittee l ast met on January
24th.
No . 1 6 -a -Purchase of Po l ye l ectrolyte Chemical Flocculant.
The Districts are taking new bids for chemicals utilized for
the solids dewaterin g orocesses. They wi ll be received on February
13th. If satisfactory prices are received, t h e staff will recommend
award as a supp lemental a ge nda item.
No. 16-b -Employment of Senior Engineer.
Mr. Torn Dawes, age 36, pre sently emp l oyed as Associate Civil
Engineer with the Co unty of Or ange, has applied for the position of
Senior Engineer with th e Distric ts . i1r. Dawes has been employed
wi th the EMA for appr oximately 10% years, working principally on
l arge flood, road and water p rojects. He has also served as the
eng ineer for Orange County Waterworks District No . 8 . In seeking
th e position of Senior Engineer with the Districts, Mr. Dawes has
r equested that his sick leave, accumulated while an employee of
th e County, be transferred to his employment with the Districts on
c ondition that it would only be used after the earned sick leave
while in the employment of the Districts was exhausted, and that
the transferred sick leave from County service would not be con-
sidered for payoff at t e rmination , death or re t ir ement . The maximum
sick l eave liabi lity to the Districts wou ld be 630 hours , no t to
exc ee d $8,057.70 . Th e staff recommends acceptance of Mr . Dawes
r e quest; all other empl oymen t benefits wi ll be the same as offered
to any new employee.
He wil l be hired at Rang e 1061E , Step 2.5 ($12.79/hr .).
Di strict No. 1
No. 18 -Adjournment to February 22nd.
The Board wil l adjourn to 8 :30 a .m., F ebruary 22nd at the
Orange Coun ty Transit Di stric t Administration offices in Garden
Grove to consider the staff -prepared Negative Declaration in accord -
ance with CEQA requir ements fo r the proposed so li ds process ing a nd
di sposa l operat ions at the County l andfil l s ite .
Di strict No. 2
Nos. 29 & 3 0 -Request for Waiver of Connection Fees .
Item No . 29 is the further consideration of the reque s t of Breal,
Inc ., for waiver of c onnection fees for a 30 -unit low -cost Senior Citi -
zens Hou sing Project. Pursuant to the Board 's in struction on J anuary
10 t h, the Genera l Counsel h as prepared five possible alternate
provisions to amend th e present District ordinance rel ative to waiver
of conn ection fees .
Item No. 30 is a request from the City 0£ An~heim for waiver of
connection fees for addi t i o n s to t h e Anaheim Stadium and Convention
Center .
F red A. Harper
General Mana ge r
RE: AGENDA ITEM #9(B ) -ALL DISTRICTS
PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC . TELEPHON ES:
1714) 982·8803
(213) 620-9 197
E
N
G
N
E
E
R
s
&
c
0
N
s
T
R
u
c
T
0
R
s
1500 WEST NINTH STREET P. 0 . BOX 1210
UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786
February 12, 1979
Cotmty Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Reference: Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives
at Tothrock Outfall Booster Station -Job # J-3-1
Gentlemen:
On February 6, 1979 bids for construction of the referenced project
were publicly opened and read by the District . The undersigned,
Pascal & Ludwi g , Inc., submitted the apparent low b{d in the total
amount of $247,225.00.
Thereafter, upon checking our bid sheets and estimate we discovered
that a -large mistake was ma de in the preparation of our bid by which
the sum of $15 ,069 .00 was erroneously omitted . The nature of the
mistake is the failure through oversigh t to include in our b id any
cost for the Falk Drive Coupli_ngs and Waukesha Drive Shafts .
The mistake occurred under the following circumstances. Mr . Larry
Watson r e ceived a lump sum bid fro m Waukesha which he tmderstood
to include a ll engine accessories. In talking with Waukesha after
the bid their quote in fact did not include drive couplings and
drive shafts .
The net effect of the mistake was that the b id we submitted to the
District does not include any cost for the drive coupling and drive
shafts . Therefore, our bid is at leas t $15,069.00 lower than we
intended it to be.
Because of the substantial magn itude of the above described mistake ,
we cannot accept an award of the contract and must reluctantly elect
to rescind our bid . We further request that the District reli eve
us of our bid because of said mistake and exon erate and return our
bid bond.
\0
;._ .. t <:")
L!j °' cc >
LU N -.u c:::i
l ·; l...W
LL..
n:: ~
Cow:ity Sanit ation District
of Orange County -2 -Fe b ruary 1 2, 1 979
All of the work sheets and estimates and other papers used in t he
preparation :cf our bid, which reflect the mistake , are availabl e
for your revie w at our offices.
If you desire any further explantation or subst a ntiation of the
mistake, we wi l l furnish whatever inf ormation is available .
AJD:bb
Received on February 9, 1979
Very truly yours ,
PASCAL & LUDWIG, I NC .
c-:> /.~
_,/ ..... ~-·
Armand J. De Weese
Executive Vice President
COU NTY .SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUN TY
By
. )
C )
,.-., ,__,
(f) .
(..)
DISTRICT 1 DIRECTORS -RE : AGENDA ITE M #ll(B)
February 7, 1979
P U B L I C NOTI'CE
TO ALL PARTIES CONCERNED:
COUNTY SANITATION DIS TRICTS
or O RANGE COUNTY. CALirORNIA
P.0.l:lOX 8 127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFOflNIA 92708
(714)540-2910
(714) 962-241 1
Sub j ect: Notice of Prepara~ion of Negative Declarat ion
Sewage Sludge Management Fac~lity , Coyote Canyon Landfill
The Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange Co unty have ordered the prepara t ion of a Negative
Dec l aration for a Sewage Sludge Management Facility, Coyote
,,.
Canyon Landfill , Irvine area for the drying and composting .of
sewage sludge .
As required under Sections 15066 and 15083 of th e State Guidelines
of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1 970 , as amended
th i s "Notice of Preparation" declares that the Boards ·of Directors
of the County Sanitation Districts of .Orange County , having
reviewed an Initial Stu dy of the Project and h avin g found that _
th ~ Project wil l not have a signi f icant effect on the environme nt ,
will consider the adoption of a Negative Declaration on
February 22, 1979 , at 8:45 A .M. at the administrative offices of
the Orange Cou nty Transit District, 11222'Acac ia Parkway ,
Garden Grove , Ca l ifornia .
If you have any questions or desire additional i nformation, p l ease
cal l (714) 540-29 10.
M. Reid
Engineer
··--... 3rd DRAFT
2/12/7tJ •
AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
THIS AGREEMENT, is made in Fountain Valley, California, on the __ day
of -----' 1979, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA (each hereinafter referred
to collectively as "Districts").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Districts are organized and existing under the provisions of the County
Sanitation District Act (Section 4700 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code); and .
WHEREAS, Districts are each engaged in the collection, transporting and dis-
posal of sewage and industrial wastes originating with the County of Orange; and
. WHEREAS, each District jointly owns an undivided and different interest in
the various facilities and properties used for the treatment and disposal of sewage
and industrial wastes, including the jointly owned trunk sewers, r eal property, improve-
men ts to rea l property, treatment plants a nd outfalls.
WHEREAS, each District serves a different territory within the County of Orange
and owns certain trunkline and interceptor sewage facilities independent of each other
District; and
WHEREAS, the territory of all Districts, together constitute a contiguous terri-
tory; and
WHEREAS, by agreement entitled "Joint Ownership, Operation a nd Construction
Agreement", dated July 1, 1970, Districts maintain a single joint administrative organ-
ization which operates and administer s all of the affairs of each District; and
1
WHEREAS, each District has adopted a Master Plan of Trunk Sewer s which
P l a n in cludes provisio n for construction of aJJ e lements thereto based on projected
l and developme nt as well as fin ancial capabili ty of the District; and
WHEREAS, ce rta in Districts pre se ntly h ave outstanding bonded ind ebt edness,
which obli gat ions are r etired by the l evy of taxes on the real properties within the
Di strict ; a nd
WHEREAS , by reason of differing status of development and land uses, each
District has d i fferent requirements for fundin g its oper ations; and
WHEREAS, many adm inistr ati ve benefits can be derived from a consolidation
of all Distr icts i nto a s in g le County Sanitation Dist r ict, including a reduction of over-
all costs; and
WHEREAS, the Districts desire to e nter this agr eement on a basis of each exis-
ting D istrict r eceiving ce rtain g uaran tees that Maste r Planned Trunk Sewer s located
within the existing territorial jurisdictio n of each District, wi ll i n fact be constructed
in accordance w i t h the cur rent time schedule s e t forth in the Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Districts in making this agreement, wish to provide for the most
equitable contribution to t he Consolidated Dis trict which is possible by each District,
so as to insure adequate fund ing fo r full secondary t r eatment through constructi on
of expanded facilities at the treatment wo r ks, if required by Jaw; and
WHEREAS, t he Districts i n entering into this agreement, w i sh to establi sh a
priority lis t of construction scheduling for planned t r unk sewer lin es which wi ll be
r e quired to be funded out of the general construction funds of the Consolidated Dis-
t ricts; a nd
WHE REAS, the Districts, by entering into th i s agreement, desire to develop
a schedul e o f u niform connection charges and user fees throughout t he Consolidated
District.
2
1st step :
petition
LAFC
Approval of
Master Plan
Sewers
oint)
Schedules for
construction
of Master
Plan Trunk
Sewers
in each
District
"Veto"
power of
local agency
re change
jn
1edule
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements set
forth hereinafter, it is agreed as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incor-
porated herein as operative provisions.
2. That the Di s tricts will petition the County of Orange, Local Agency Formation
Commiss ion, pursuant to the District Reorganization Act (California Government
Code Sections 56000 et seg.), for consolidation into one County Sanitation District,
whose territory will include all of the territory now contained within their respective
territorial boundaries.
3. The consolidation di s trict, hereinafter called
--------------------------~
will be known as
----------------------------------------~
4. The Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and Facilities for the Consolidated Districts,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein, is hereby approved and adopted.
No amendment shall be made thereto without .first holding a public hearing thereon
after published and w ritten notice to each member agency advising of such hearing.
Upon a conclusion of such hearing, any amendment must be approved by a 2/3 vote
of all Directors.
5. The signatories hereto agree that in orde r to equitably utilize the revenues
of the Districts , and to insure the construction of Master Planned Facilities within
the territorial limits of the member agencies, substantially in accord with the Master
Plan schedule of the predecessor Districts, the facilities listed on Schedules 1, 2 and
3 of Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein, shall be constructed by
the Consolidated District in the following sequential order: First: Those facilities
set forth on Schedule B-1; Second: Those facilities set forth on Schedule B-2; Th i rd:
Those facilities set forth on Schedule B-3. Any proposed modif ication or change to
said schedules which results in any facility being placed lower in priority of construc-
tion shall require the approval by the Director(s ) representing the member agency
or agencies in which said facility to be delayed in construction, is to be constructed.
3 ..
Sch B-1 ~
~uaranteed
)nstruct 1 of\ :
'-f5r esent
fun ds to 'be
used fo r
cons truction
within
existing Di st.
territo ry
Thi s Section
gu arantees
th e integrity
of indiv .
Dist.
reserves for
us e within
Dist.
,,.
'c"!e
c. 12
Consolidated
Fu nd will
cover any
shortfall in
construct.
cost.
Sche d. B-2 :
g ua ranteed
const ruc t ion
within 5 y r s.
6. Th e signatories hereto agree th at the trunk line sewe r s, shown on Schedule
B-1, const i t ute facilities which were master pla nned by the individual p r edecesso r
districts and in fac t are f ull y funded as a resul t of re serves on deposi t by the individual
Di s trict as o f the date of this ag r eement. In r ecog nition the reof, said funded amounts
as tra n sferr ed into th e Con so lidated District a ccounts, shall be used exclus ivel y fo r
the purpose of construction of sai d Jin es. It is agr eed that i f the actual cost of con-
s tructi on of any of said lines set forth on Schedule B-1 exceeds the amou nt budgeted
therefor a nd for which r eserves a r e on deposit, that said excess will be funded by
the r emaining reserves credited to said District in the capital outlay fund of the con-
solidated distr ict. In th e event the actual cost of cons t ruction i s l ess than the amount
bud geted for said proj ect, the excess funds will remain in the capital outlay const rue-
tion fund of the Consolidated District fo r t he credit of o t her projects withi n the ter ri-
tory of said former individual Di strict a nd as li sted on Schedules B-1 and B-2 .
If, after construction of a ll Maste r Planned Trunk Sewers liste d on Schedu l es
B-1 and B-2, funds remain on deposit for the credit of the former District, said funds
s hall be expenqed as set forth in Section 13 below .
If capital outlay funds reserved by a former District are insufficient to meet
the tota l cost of construction of all trunk sewer lines set forth on Schedules B-1 and
B-2 the balance r equired shall be provided by the Consolidated District cpaital fund
upon vote of a major i ty of the D irectors.
7. Th ose Master P lanned Trunk Lines, set forth on Schedule B-2, constitute
facilities w hich have been p r ev i ously master planned by the individual predecessor
District, but for wh i ch total funding was not av ailable as a r eserve on deposit as of
the effecti ve date of this agreement. It is ag r eed that the constr uction of a ll facil -
ities set fo r th on Schedule B-2 shall be in the s equential orde r shown thereon and
shall not be modified except as set forth in Sect ion 5 above, provided, however, t hat
said schedule shall t erminat e afte r a per iod of five year s from the effective date
4
Requires
2/3 vote
to amend
:hed. + vote
f City where
to be
built.
Sched. B-3 :
t ent. const.
sched. only .
Modifiable
by majority
vote of alJ
Directors.
Constr. Sched.
modif. due
to grants.
Const.
Sch ed.
modif. due
to private
funding.
of this agreement. Thereafter, the Master Plan of Facilities Construction Schedule
for those items set forth on Schedule B-2 may be amended by a majority vote of the
Directors and without the express consent of the director representing the l ocal agen-
cy in which said facility is to be located.
8. Those Master Planned Facilities set forth in Schedule B-3 constitute Master
Planned Facilities for which neither funding nor construction schedules have been
established as of the date of this agreement. The priority of construction for these
facilities shall be in the sequential order shown thereon but said o rder may be modified
at any time by a vote of the majority of the Directors. Funding for said facilities
shalJ be from the capital outlay revolving fund of the Consolidated District.
9. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 7 and 8 above, any project set
forth on Schedule B-2 or Schedule B-3, of this agreement can be approved fo r construe-
tion in advance of the listed sequential priority b y a majority vote of the Directors,
if the project is funded by an amount equal to at least 7 5% of the construction cost
through grants provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the
State Water Resources Control Board, or any other governmental agency outside of
the Districts.
I 0. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 7 and 8 above, any project set
forth on Schedule B-2 or Schedule B-3 of this agreemment can be approved for con-
struction in advance of the listed sequential priority by a majority vote of the Directors,
if its construction is to be paid for by individual property owners, either as a condition
of annexation to the Districts, or as a result of the execution of a reimbursement
agreement by the property owner and the District. In such instance, the total cost
of construction shalJ be advanced by the property owner, w ithout cost to the District.
If the District approves the execution of a reimbursement agreement with the prop-
erty owner, whe reby the District agrees t o repay the cost of construction to said
owner, the terms and conditions of said agreement shall provide that reimburse ment
5
..
Priorit i es
o f
expending
each
Dist.'s
c urre nt f un ds .
shall b e mad e only a ft e r a ll othe r proj ect s se t forth on th e sequenti a l priority li st
of Sche dule B-2 h a ve b een full y constru cted and paid fo r . Thereafter, th e r e imburse-
ment amo unts s ha ll be pai d for out of the c a pital ou tlay r e vo lving fund of the consol-
idate d district .
11. As of the da t e of this agr eement, a ll r ig ht, title and inte r est in the assets
and liabilities of each District par ty hereto , s h a ll be t r a n sfe rred to the Co nsolida t ed
District . A ll r eserves for construction a nd a ll bond rede mption mon i es on deposit
in the name of or h e l d for t he credit of a Distri ct shall be t ransf e rr ed to the Consol-
idated Dist ri ct's accounts for the b e nefit of properties withi n said fo r m e r D istrict .
Specifi cally, s uch monies shall be expended in accordance wi th the provisio n s of para-
graph 13 b e l ow .
12. All bond r ede mption funds presentl y h e l d in reser ve by a former Di str ict,
sh a ll be t r a nsfer r ed to the Consolidated Dis trict's accounts and held in segregated
fund accounts with the rig ht t o hold said f unds or portions the reof, u ntil such time
as l egally r eq uired to retire any outstanding bonds by payment of both principal a n d
interest . AH interest on these monies so he l d shall accr ue to the bene fit of said bond
r ede mption fund. All monies r emaini ng after pay ment of a ll o ut stand i ng bo n ds shall
be tr a ns ferred and expe nded in acco rd a n ce with t he provis i ons of Section 13 .
13. It is the inte nt of the part ies h ereto that each exi st ing predecessor District,
s ig natory to t hi s agreeme n t, s ha ll have the r eserv e fu nds of said Di str ict wh ich ex i s t
as of the date of t his ag r eement, togeth e r wi th any a nnex ation fees a nd connecti on
charges r ecei ved during the fi r st five (5) years of this agreeme nt , set aside a n d obliga-
t e d t o f und the fo llowing f inancial obligations in the orde r set for th.
a) To pa y the current obligati o n of said Di strict fo r the cost of con st ru e-
ting expanded t r eatment p lant faci lities as d esc ribed in the 11 6 Yea r
P l a n Th rough 1983-84" (which does not incl ude a n y add ition a l secon-
dary treatment faci lit ies beyond that existin g or unde r construction-
based on obtain i ng a wa iver pursuant to Public Law 9 5-2 17)
6
·•
b) To pay all principal and interest necessary to for redemption of out-
standing bonded indebtedness, if any.
c) To pay for the cost of construction of Master Planned Trunk Sewers
within the t erritory of said District, as set forth on Schedules B-
l and B-2.
Any remaining funds on deposit to the credit of said District after payme nt
of all obligations set forth in 13(a)(b) and (c) above shall be refunded in equal amounts
to each real property owner of record within the t e rritory of said District by means
of a credit on the r eal property tax levy for the fi scal year following said order by
the Board of Directors.
In the event the District is legally barred from granting a tax. credit as reimburse-
ment to the property owners as set forth above, then all remaining funds shall revert
to the capital outlay fund of th.e Consolidated District for the construction of construc-
tion of other capital projects within the Consolidated District.
14 .. Concurrently with the execution of this agreement, the Consolidated District
shall form improve ment districts or similar legal plan for the purpose of providing
the necessary identificatio n for retirement of outsta nd in g bonded indebtedness, which
obligations have continued over from the predecessor sanitation district.
15. That certain proposed ordinance setting fo rth a uniform schedule of connec-
tion charges and us e r fee charges for all properties within the consolidated district,
attached hereto as Exhibit "C", and incorpora ted here in by reference, as though set
forth at length, is hereby approved.
16. The Consolidated District is designated as the successor-in-interest to Sani-
tation Di s tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 a nd 11, and each of them, for the purpose of suc-
ceeding to all of the rig hts, duties and obligations of each of said dist r icts, with r espect
to the enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding obligations, including
bonds, other existing contracts and agreements . Additionally, each of the sig na tory
7
Districts hereto agrees to convey any and all rights, title and interest to the equip-
ment, property, easements, rights-of-way and interests in real or personal property
to the consolidated district for the benefit of said consolidated district. All funds
of the consolidated district shall be conveyed to the Consolidated District. The Co nsol-
idated District agrees to accept all conveyances from each individual District, and
assume all obligations of each individual District.
17. This agreement shall be effective , 1979 or sixty (60) days ------
after approval by the Board of Directors of all seven (7) Districts, party hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and by authority of Resolution No. __ , dated __ _
19_ of the Board of Directors of this District approving this agreement, we have
executed this agreement this __ day of ______ , 1979.
APPROVES AS TO FORM:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
-C=""""h-a~ir_m_a_n------------~
By-=-----------------~ Secretary
Thomas L. Woodruff, Gene ral Couns el
jm:D: 12:2/ 12/79
8
..
ORDINAN CE ESTABLISHNG UNIFORM
CONNECTION CHARGES AND U SER FEES
Thi s Ordinance is not ye t developed and will be done at the time of preparing
the adoption of a R e ve nue Progr a m .
EXHIBIT 11 C 11
:
SCHEDULE B-1
Revision 1
Revision 2
1/24/79
1/26/79
Fully Funded Master Plan Sewers
DISTRICT 1
Miscellaneous Projects
DISTRICT 2
Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Ca nyon
Orange Sub-Trunk Rive r Crossing
Orchard & Richfield Interceptor
Liability to Anaheim for South Santa
Ana Rive r Interce ptor
Distribution of Joint Wor ks
SAWPA Equity
Carbon Can y on Dam Interce ptor
Olive Sub-Trunk Ri ver Crossing
South Santa Ana Ri ver Interceptor
Miscellaneous Projects
DISTRICT 3
Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 3
Reimburse Other CSD's for Se al
Beach Blvd. Pump Station Equity
Orangethor pe Relief Trunk Reach 15
Westmin s ter Avenue Force Main
Additional Pumps at Seal Beach
Pump Station
Knott Interceptor, Reach 8
Miscellaneous Projects
DISTRICT 5
Replace Pump s at "A" St., 14th St.
and Lido Pump Station
Lining of Coast Highway Force Main
Master Plan Update and NIWA Project
Replace Portion of Bay s ide Drive Sewer
Jamboree Drive Relief Sys tem
New Santa Ana Riv e r Crossing
Bay Bridge Pump Station Additions
Lining of Coa s t Hi ghway Force Main
Replace Pumps at Roc ky Point
Reimbursem e nt Agr eeme nts Payable
Miscellaneo us Projects
Total Funds
Required
422,000
422,000
5,000
30,000
820,000
91'908
1, 138 ,000
1,000,000
300,000
125,000
600,000
4,109,908
3,400,000
85,400
80,000
1,600,000
275,000
2,000,000
400,000
7,840,400
7,000
150,000
33,000
250,000
1,000,000
220,000
350,000
257,000
13,000
159,689
375,000
2,814,689
Appropriated
Funds
On Hand (a)
422,000
422,000
5,000
30,000
820,000
91. 908
1,138,ooo
1,000,000
300,000
125,000
600,000
4, 109,908
3,400,000
85,400
80,000
1,600 ,000
275,000
2,000,000
400,000
7,840,400
7,000
150,000
33,000
250,000
1,000,000
220,000
350,000
257,000
13,000
159,689
375,000
2,814,689
Balance
To Be
Provided
:
SCHEDULE B-1
(Continued)
DISTRICT 6
New Santa Ana River Crossing
Lining of Coast High way Force Main
Replace Pump at Rocky Point
DISTRICT 7
Mi che 1 son Sub-Tru.nks
Replace Pump at Navy Way Station
Tustin-Orange, Reaches 17 & 18, and
Hewes/Chapman
DISTRICT 11
Ocean Avenue Trunk
Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 1 and
Portion of Reach 2 and Newland
Stree t Intercepto r
Coast Hi ghwa y Trunk , Port ion of Reh 2
Slater Pu mp Station Upgrade a nd
New Force Main
Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 3
Edwards Trunk
Warn er Avenue Relief Sewer
GRAND TOTAL
Total Funds
Required
80,000
143,000
9,000
232,000
200,000
10,000
253,831
463,831
50,000
4,000,000
1,400,000
400,000
850 ,000
600 ,000
230,000
1,530,000
23,412,828
Appropriated
Funds
On Hand (a)
80,000
143,000
9,000
232,000
200,000
10,000
253,831
463,831
50,000
4,000,000
1 '1100 '000
400,000
850,000
600,000
230,000
7,530,000
23,412,828
Balance
To Be
Provided
(a) All projects on this schedule are fully funded by current accumulated
construction reserves.
-2-
..
·~ ....
SCHEDULE B-2
Maste r P l an Facilit i es To Be Constructed
During Next Five Yea r s With Current
Funding and/or Future Revenues
DIS TRICT 3
Or angethorpe Relief Trunk
DISTR ICT 6
Misce ll aneous Projects
DISTRICT 7
Tustin-Orange, Reaches 17 & 18
Tustin-Orange, Reaches 19 & 20
Miscellaneous Projects
DISTR I CT 11
Go l de n West I nterceptor
Wa r ner Avenue Sewer Purchnse
.. Miscellaneous Projects
GRAND TOTA L
To ta l Funds
Requ i red
2,275,000
17 5,000
302,847
365,000
630,000
1,297,847
309,000
250,000
375,000
934;000
4,681 ,847
(a ) Co nnection Fees collected past 3 years
1975-76
1976-77
1977 -78
$ 3. 1 mi 11 ion
3. 9 mi 11 ion
3. 6 mi 11 ion
Appropriated
Funds
On Hand
1,025,780
86,582
347,604
3~7,604
323,667
323;667
1,783,633
Revision 1 1/24/79
Revision 2 1/26/79
Balance
To Be
Provided (a) Priority
1,249,220
88,4 18
302,847
365,000
282 '396
950 ,243
309 ,000
250,000
51 ,333
610,333
2,898,214
2 (b)
2 (b)
3
4 (c)
(b) Scheduling dependent upon City of Orange needs in future annexations to city .
(c) May be de l eted after re-evaluation of Consol i dated Master Pl an requirements.
'!
SCHEDULE B-3
Facilities To Be Constructed
From Future Revenues
Total Funds
Required
DISTRICT 3
Ka tel la Relief Interceptor 200,000
Crescent Relief Trunk, Reach 14 258,000
Magnolia Interceptor, Reach 30 270,000
Lampson Interceptor, Reaches 11
and 12 410,000
1,138,000
DISTRICT 6
Gisler Trunk Re 1 i ef Sewer 1,000,000
DISTRICT 7
South Irvine Lift Station 250,000
South Irvine Sub-Trunk 200,000
i.50,000
DISTRICT 11
Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 4 501,000
Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 5 1,000,000
Edwards Trunk, Reach 1 900,000
Coast Highwa y Trunk, Reach 6 1 ,489 ,000
McFadden Avenue Relief Trunk 124,000
Edinger Avenue Interceptor 100,000
Heil Avenue Relief Sewer 156,000
Graham Street Sewer Purchase 104,ooo
Springdale Trunk Sewer 670,000
5,044 ,ooo
GRAND TOTAL 7,632,000
(a) Connection fees collected past 3 years:
1975-76
1976-77
1977-78
$ 3 . 1 mi 11 ion
3. 9 mi 11 ion
3. 6 mi 11 ion
Appropriated
Funds
On Hand
-o-
-o-
-o-
-o-
-o-
(b) Scheduling dependent upon needs in Balsa Chica area
Revision 1
Revision 2
Balance
To Be
Provided (a)
200,000
258,000
270,000
410,000
1,138,ooo
1,000,000
250,000
200,000
450,000
501 ,000
1,000,000
900,000
1,489,000
124,000
100,000
156,000
104,000
670,000
5,044,ooo
7,632,000
(c) May be deleted after re-e valuation of Con s olidati o n Master Plan
1/24/79
1/26/79
Priority
7 (c)
7 (c)
7 (c)
7 (c)
2
2
3
5 (b)
6 (d)
7 (b)
8 (c) (d )
8 (c) (d )
8 (c) (d )
9 (c) (d)
4
(d) Conn e cts to Coast Hwy trun k, must be scheduled after Reach 5 of Coast Hwy trunk built
Revision 1 1/24/79
Revision 2 1/26/79
COUN TY SANITATION DISTRIC TS 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
1. Treatment Plant Expansion (a)
2. Less Grant Funding
3. Net Treatment Plant Local
Fundi ng Re qu ired (6 -yea r s 78/79-
83/84)
4. Outstanding Bonds (Principal)
5. Sch e dule B-1 Master Plan Facilities
(5 -years 73/79 -82/83)
6. Less Grant Funding
7. Total Fundin~ Requi r emen ts
8. Cas h on Hand
9. Funds (Avai l ab l e) or Requir ed
10. Schedu le B-2 Mast e r Pl a n Faci 1 i ties
(Afte r 82/83)
11. Funds (Available) o r Required
12 . Schedu 1 e B-3 Fae i I i t I es
13. Funds (Available) or Required
14. Bond Interest (c)
Dist . /1 1
10,442,000
(5, 135,000)
5,307,000
840,000
422,000
6,569,000
SUMMARY OF FUNDS AVAILAB LE
AND ADDITIONAL FUN DI NG REQUIR ED
CONSO LID ATION BUDGE T REVIEW
DI st. #2 Di st. #3
34,728 ,0DO 38,039,000
(17 ,078,000) (18,707 ,000)
17,650 ,000 19 ,3 32 ,000
3,91i5,000 5,951i,OOO
4. 109 ,908 7,840,400
25,701i,908 33, 126,400
Di st. #5
8,022,000
(3 ,945,000)
4 ,077,000
276,000
2,814,639
7, 167 ,689
(7,22 6,042) (35,192 ,435) (34,333,238) (7,659,998)
(65 7 ,042) (9 ,4 87 ,527) (l ,206,838)
(657,042)
(657,042)
103,688
(553,354)
2,2 75,000
(9,487,527) 1,068 ,162
1,138,000
(9,487,527) 2,206,162
468,469 75 4 ,44 4
(9,0 19,058) 2,960 ,606
( 492 . 309)
(492 ,309)
(492,309)
44,21i8
(448 ,061)
Dist. #6
6,749,000
(3,319,000)
3 ,430,000
262,000
232 ,000
3 ,921i ,OOO
Dist. #7
9 ,909 ,00 0
(4 ,8 73 ,000)
5,036,000
Di st. #11
7 ,871,000
(3 ,871 ,000)
li ,000 ,000
6 ,11 0,200-(b) 848,ooo
463,831 7 ,530 ,000
(3,480,000)
11 ,6 10,031 8 ,898,000
(4,018,692) (12,259,020) (9,247,717)
(94,692)
175,000
80,308
1 ,000,000
1,080,308
35 ,734
1,11 6 ,042
(648 ,989)
1 ,297 ,847
648,858
450,000
1 ,098 ,858
1 ,849,850
2,948 ,7 08
(349' 717)
934,000
581i ,283
5,044,000
5,628 ,283
14 8,800
5,777 ,083
(a) Assumes wa i ve r of secondary t reatment
(b) Inc ludes JOS Li abil ity
(c) It i s anticipated that bond Interest payments can be made from inve stment interest earnings on the bond principa l.
TOT AL
115,760 ,000
(56 ,928,000)
58,832,000
18,235,200
23,412,828
(3 ,480 ,000)
97,000,028
(109,93 7,142 )
(12,937,114)
4 ,681 ,847
(8 ,255 ,267)
7,632,000
(623 ,267)
3,405,233
2 ,781 ,966
TREATMENT PLANT-( I )
Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/84
Appropriat i on for Trmt. Pl ant Fac ilities to
Comp l y 1<i th State & Federa l Regs .
App ropriat i on for Non-Grant Funded Faciliti es
TOTAL PLANT EXPANS ION
MASTER PL AN OF TRUNK SEWERS & OTllER CAP ITAL FUND
I TEMS -(2)
Appropriation f or District Faci l ities
TOTAL MASTER PLAN
BONDED OES T 1951 ISSUE:
Outst andi ng Bonds @ 6/30/78
I nterest
Authorized General Reserve
TOTAL BONDED I ND EBTEDNESS
GRAND TO TAL
COUNTY SAN I TATION DI STR ICT NO. l OF ORANG E COUN TY
CONSOL I DA TI ON BUDGET REVIEW
(1)
TO TAL
FUN DS
REQUIRED A
10,442 ,000
10 ,442 ,000
422 '000 -(3)
422 ,DOO
840,000
103 ,688
943 ,688
11 ,807 ,688
(2)
1978-79
BUDGET
PPROPR I AT ION
(2 ,820 ,627)
(2 ,332 ,2 16)}
(l ,832 ,455)
(6,985,298)
(72 ,393)
(72 '393)
(70,000)
( 19' 163)
(79,188 )
( 168' 35 1)
(7,226,042)
(3)
BALANCE TO
BE PRO\/ I OED
OR (llPPROPR lllTEO )
7 ,621 .373
(4,164,67 1)
3,456,702
31.9,607
349,607
770 ,000
84,525
(79, 188 )
775,337
4 . 581 ,646
(I) I
ES T I MATED
CONSTRUCT I ON
GRANTS
(5. 135,000)
(5 , 135 ,ooo)
(5. 135 ,000)
(l} 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to de l e te 100 MGO secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver)
(5)
ALLOCAT I DN
OF APPROPR IATI ONS
ANO RESERVES
(2,486,373)
3,526 ,792
1,040 ,1119
(349 '607)
(349 ,607)
(770,000)
79 , 188
(690,812)
Revisi on l 1/24/79
Revision 2 1/26/79
(6)
UNAPPROPRIA TED SAL
1\VA I Li\OL[) OR
ADD I TIONAL FUNDING
REQUIRED
(4)
(637 ,879)
(637 ,879)
84 ,525
84,525
( 55 3.351-0
Purchase and sa l e of joint works equ ity ha s been o mitted . Thi s i tem i s fu l ly f unde d for 197 8-79 and would be d i scontinued in future years i f
consolidat i ons o c c u rs .
(2) Th e follow i ng 1978-79 capita l budget items have been om i tted f rom the above for t he r easons set f ort h.
(a) IC R payment to Federal Governme nt -$9 ,000: This item is funded ann uall y from industria l user charges.
(b) Capita l funds "opera ting costs -56,100 : Expenses are nomina l and fun ded from annual reve nues.
(c) Transfer to Operat i ng Fund -SSl12,5 56 : To cover Prop . 13 sho rtfall. Ant ici pate a simi l ar transfer in 1979-80, part i al ly offset by budgetary
savings and additional revenue, pendi ng determination re user charges.
(3) Mi scellaneous Projects
(11 ) If full secondar y treatme nt requ ireme nt i s not waived , an add i tional Sl,7 1'1 ,000 in l ocal fund s will be requi r ed.
COUUTY SAN I TATION DI STR I CT NO. 2 OF ORA NG E CO UN TY
CON SO LI DATI ON BUDGET REVIEW
Rev I s Ion I /24/79
Rev Is I on I /26/79
(6)
(I )
TOTAL
FU NDS
REQU I RED
(2) (3) (4) (5) (UNAPPROPRIA TED BAL
1978-79 BALANCE TO EST I MATED ALLO CA TI ON AVA ILAB LE) OR
BUDGET OE PROV I DED CON STRUC TION OF APPRO PR IATI ONS ADD I TIONAL FUNDING
TREATMENT PLANT-(!)
Plant Ex pans i on 1978/79 -1983/84
Approp riati on fo r Trmt. Plant Facilities to
Co mp ly 1•ith State & Federa l Regs .
Appropriation fo r Non -Grant Fund ed
Treatment Pl a "t Facilit i es
TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION
MASTE R PL MI TR UNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND
ITEMS-(2)
Sle epy Holl ow-Carbon Can yon
Liability to Anahe i m for So. S/A River Trunk
Orange Su b-Trunk River Cross ing
Distribution of Joint Works SAWPA Equity
Or chard and Richf i e ld Inte rcept o r
Appropriation fo r District l mp r oven~nts
SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND
Carbon Cany on Dam I nterceptor
S l eepy Ho llow-Carbon Canyon Project
Ol i ve Sub -Trunk River Crossing
South Santa Ana River Inte rceptor
Appropriation for District Faciliti es
and Impro vements
BONDED DEBT
1951 I ssue:
SUB-TOTAL FR FUND
TOTAL MASTER PLAN
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
In t eres t
Authorized Gene ral Reserve
1958 I ssue:
Bond s Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authori zed Genera l Re serve
TOTAL BONDED INDE BTE DNESS
GRAND TOTAL
34,728,000
34,728,000
5,000
91,908
30,000
I , 138,000
820,000
2,084,908
1,000 ,D00-(4)
300,000
125,000
600. 000-(3)
2,025,000
4,109,908
495,0DO
54,844
549,844
3,450 ,000
413 ,625
3,863,625
43,251,377
APPROPRIAT I ON
(9 ,253 , 146 )
(7. 768 ,000) }
(6. 189 ,000)
(23,210,146)
(5,000)
(46 ,000)
(30,000)
(1 , 138 ,000)
(820 ,000)
(2 ,341 ,500)
(4,)80,500)
-o-
-o-
(3 00 ,000)
( 125 ,000)
(6 .363 ,401)
(6,788,401)
(11 , 168,901) I -
(45,000)
(I 1, 194)
(50 ,)44)
(106 ,538)
(350,000)
(104 ,250)
(252 ,600)
(706 ,850)
(8 1),)88)
(35, 192,435)
OR (APPROP RIATE D) GRANTS ANO RESERVES REQUIRED
25,474 ,854 ( 17 ,078 ,000) (8,396,854)
( 13 .957 ,000) 8,396,854 (5' 560. 14 6)
11,517 ,854 (17 ,078,000) -o-(5,560, 146)
45,908 (45 ,908 )
(2 ,)Ill ,500) 2 . 34 1 • 500
(2 ,295 ' 592 ) 2 ,2 95 ,592
1,000 ,000 (I ,000 ,000)
(5. 763 ,401) I ,95 1,464 (J,811,9l7)
(11,763,401) 95 1,464 ( 3 ,811 • 937)
(7,058 .99 3) 3 ,247,056 (J,8 11,937)
450,000 (450,000)
43 ,650 4),650
(50,344) 50,)44
44),306 (399,656) I 43,650
3, 100 ,000 (3. 100 ,00 0)
309,375 309,375
(252 ,600) 252 ,600
3,156 ,775 (l,847 ,400) 309,3 75
3.600,081 (3,247,056) 353 ,025
8,058 ,942 (17,078 ,000 ) -o-(9 ,019,058)
(1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 MGD seconda ry treatmen t (assume receipt of waiver).
Pur chase and sale of joint •1orks equity has been omitted. This item is ful l y funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years i f
con so 1i daLion oc curs .
(2) The following 1978 -79 capital budget items have bee n omitted from the above for the reas ons set forth .
(a) ICR paymen t to Federa l Government -S30,000: This item i s funded annua l ly from indust r ia l user cha r ges.
(b) Capitttl funds "operating costs" -$82,100: Ex penses a r c nom i nal and funded from annua l revenues .
(c) Tr ansfer to Op e rating Fund -SI ,689 ,609: To cover Prop . 13 •hortfal I. An li c i pate asimilar transfer i n 19 79 -80 , par ti a l l y o ffs et by budget ary
savings and add itiona l revenue, pend i ng determination re user charges .
(d) S l eepy ll o l l ow-Carbon Ca nyon Projec t -$200,000: Project has been cance l l ed.
(3) Mi sce ll aneous Projects.
(4) Revi s ed cost estimate .
(5) If full secondary treatment Is not wa i ved , an additiona l $5,700,000 In l oca l funds will be required.
(5)
TREATMEN T PLANT -(1)
Pl ant Expans ion 1978/79 -1983/84
App ro pr i ation for Trmt. Pl an t Facilities to
Comply with State & Federal Regs.
Appropriation for Hon-G rant Funded Faci l ities
TOTAL PLANT EXPANSIOtl
MASTER PLAN TRUtlK SEllERS & OTHER CAP ITAL FUND
ITEMS -(2)
Knott Interceptor -Po r tion o f Reach
Reimburse other CSD's for Sea l Beach Blvd. Pump
Station Equity
Or angethorpe Relief Trunk , Reach IS
Westminster Avenue Force Main
Appropriation for District Imp rovements
SUB -T OTAL ACO FUUD
Addit i ona l Pu mps at Seal Beach P.S.
Knott Interceptor -Reach 8
Ka r e ll a Relief Interceptor
Orangethorpe Relief Trunk -Reaches 16 & 16A
Cr escent Relief Trunk, Reach 14
Magno l ia I ntercept or , Reach JO
' ~son Intercep t or , Reaches II & 12
1p riation f or District Imp rovements
SUB -TOTAL FR FUND
TOTAL MASTER PLAtl
BONDED DEBT -1951 & 1958 I ssues:
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/J0/78
Interest
Autho r ized Genera l Reserve
TOTAL BONDED DEBT
GRAND TOTAL
COUNTY SAtllTA TI ON DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE CO UNTY
COtlSOLI DAT I OH BUDG ET REVI Ell
(I )
TOTAL
FUNDS
REQUIRED
38 ,039,DOO
38 ,039 ,000
3,400,000
85,400
80,000
1 ,600,000
-o-
s . 165 ,400
275,000-(4)
2 ,000 ,000
20 0 ,000
2 ,275 ,000
258,000
270 ,000
410,000
400 ,000-(3)
6 ,088,000
11'253 '400
S ,954 ,ooo
754,444
(2)
1978-79
BUDGET
APPROPR IAT ION
(10 ,26 1 ,62 1)
(8,6 14,000)}
(6 ,863 ,000)
(25,738,621)
(3 ,400 ,000)
(85, 400)
(80,000)
(1 ,600,000)
(67 ,823)
(5,233,223)
(2,000 ,000)
(184 ,065)
(2 ,184,065)
(7,417,288)
(535,000)
(18 1 ,058 )
(461 ,271)
(I, 177 ,329 )
(34 ,333 '238)
(3)
BALANCE TO
BE PROVIDED
OR (APPRO PRIATE D)
27,777 ,379
(IS ,477 ,000)
12,300 ,379
(67,823)
(67 ,823)
275 ,000
200 ,000
2,275 ,000
258 ,000
270,000
4 10 ,000
215 ,935
3,903,935
3,836,11 2
S,419,000
573 ,386
(461 ,271)
5 ,531, 11 S
2 1 ,667 ,606
(4)
EST I HATED
CONSTRUCT I Otl
GRANTS
(18,707,000)
(18,707 ,000)
( 18 '707 ,000)
(I ) 1978-79 Bud get 5-year cash f l ow adjusted to de l ete 100 HGO seconda r y treatment (assume recei p t of waiver).
Rev i sion I 1/24/79
Revision 2 1/26/79
(5)
ALLOCATION
OF APPROPR IAT I ONS
AllD RESE RVES
(9,070 ,379)
15,477,000
6,406,62 1
67,823
67,823
(275,000)
(l ,025,780)
(21s'935)
(1 ,516,715)
(1 ,448,892)
(S ,419,000)
461 ,271
(4 ,957' 729)
(6)
(UNAPPROPRIATED BAL
AVAILABLE) OR
ADD IT I ONAL Furm I NG
REQUIRED
(S)
200,000
l ,24 9 ,220
258 ,000
270 ,000
410,000
2,387,220
2 ,387,220
573 ,386
573 .386
2,960,606
Purchase and sa l e of joint v1orks equ ity has been om itt ed . Thi s i t em is fu ll y funded for 1978 -79 and wou l d be discontinued in future years i f
consoli dation occurs.
(2) The f ol l 01•in9 1978-79 capita l budget it ems have been om itted from the above For the rea sons set forth:
(a) ICR payment to Fede ral Government -533,000: Thi s Item i s funded annua ll y from i ndustrial user charges.
(b) Capit.,I fund s "operating costs" -581t ,4 00: Expenses ure nominal and funded from annual revenues .
(c) Transfer to Operating Fund -51 ,477 ,461: To cover Prop. 13 s ho rtfall. Anticipate a simi lar t ransfer in 19 79-80 , partia l l y offset by budgetary
savings and additional revenue, pending determi nation re user charges.
(3) Miscellaneous Projects.
(4) Revised Cost Estimate.
(S) I f ful l secondary treatment is not waived, an additiona l 56,243,000 in l oca l funds will be required .
TREATMENT PLANT·(l)
Plant Expansion
Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities to
Comply with State & Federal Regs.
Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities
TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION
MASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND
ITEHS-(2)
Replace Pumps at "A" St., 14th St., & lido P.S.
Lining of Coast Hwy. Force Hain
Appropriation for District Improvements
Master Plan Update & NIWA Project
SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND
Replace Portion of Bayside Drive Sewer
Jamboree Drive Relief System
New Santa Ana River Crossing
Bay Bridge P.S. Additions
Lining of Coast Hwy. F/H
Replace Pumps at Rocky Point
Reimbursement Agreements Payable
Appropriation for District Improvements
SUB-TOTAL FR FUND
TOTAL HASTER PLAN
BONDED DEBT: 1951 Issue
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
TOTAL BONDED DEBT
GRAND TOTAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY
CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW
(I)
TOTAL
FUNDS
~
8,022,000
8,022,000
7,000
150,000
-0-
33, ooo
190,000
250,000-(4)
1,000,000-(4)
220,000-(4)
350,000-(li)
257,000-(li)
13,000
159,689
375,000-(3)
2,624,689
2,814,689
276,000
44,248
320,248
II, 156,937
(2)
1978-79
BUOGET
APPROPRIATION
(2' 122 ,452)
(I, 782 ,000)
(1,420,000)
(5,324,452)
(7 ,000)
(150,000)
(882,852)
(33 ,ODO)
(I ,072 ,852)
(50,000)
(500,000)
(13 ,000)
( 16,667)
(632, 192)
(1,211,859)
(2 ,28li. 711)
(20,000)
(7 ,315)
(23,520)
(50,835)
(7 ,659,998)
(3)
BALANCE TO
BE PROVIDED
OR (APPROPRIATED)
5,899,548
(3,202,000)
2,697,Sli8
(882,852)
(882,852)
200,000
500,000
220,000
350,000
257,000
143,022
(257' 192)
1,412,830
529,978
256,000
36,933
(23,520)
269,413
3,496,939
(4)
EST I HATED
CONSTRUCTION
GRANTS
(3,945,000)
(3,9li5,000)
(3,945,000)
(1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver).
Revision I 1/24/79
Revision 2 1/26/79
(6)
(5) UNAPPROPRIATED BAL
ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR
OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING
ANO RESERVES REQUIRED
(I ,954,5'i8)
2,717,006 (484,994)
762,li58 (484 ,994)
882,852
882,852
(200,000)
(500,000)
(220,000)
(350,000)
(257 ,000)
(143,022)
257, 192
(1,1t12,830)
(529,978)
(256,000)
36,933
23,520
(232,480) 36,933
(448,061)
Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years If
consolidation occurs.
(2) The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth:
(a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$7,000: This item Is funded annually from industrial user charges.
(b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$9,400: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues.
(c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$330,738: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary
savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges.
(d) Transfer ACO to FR $50,000: Inter-fund transfer cancels out.
(3) Hiscellaneous Projects.
(4) Revised Cost Estimate.
(5) If full secondary treatment requirement is not waived, an additional $1,317,000 In local funds will be required.
..
r
TREATMENT PLANT-(1)
Plant Expansion 1978/79 -1983/8li
Appropriation for Tnnt. Plant Facilities to
Comply with State & Federal Regs.
Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities
TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION
MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND
ITEHS-(2) (ACO FUND)
New Santa Ana River Crossing
lining of Coast H\-1y F/H
Gisler Trunk Relief Sewer
Replace Pumps at Rocky Point
Appropriation for District Improvements
TOTAL KASTER PLAN
~ONDED DEBT -1951 Issue
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
TOTAL BONDED DEBT
GRAND TOTAL
\._.,I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY
CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW
(1)
TOTAL
FUNDS
REQUIRED A
6,749,000
6,749,000
80,000-(li)
143,000-(4)
1,000,000
9,000
175,000-(3)
1,407.000
262.000
35.734
297,734
(2)
1978-79
BUDGET
PPROPRIATION
(1.812.152)
(I, 126,442)
(8811,663)
(3,823,227)
(50,000)
(9,000)
(7li,503)
(133,503)
(25,000)
(8,110)
(28,852)
(61,962)
(4 ,018 ,692)
(3)
BALANCE TO
BE PROVIDED
OR (APPROPRIATED)
li,936,81t8
(2 .011,075)
2,925,773
80,000
93,000
1,000,000
100,497
1,273,497
237,000
27,624
(28,852)
235,772
4,435,042
(Ii)
EST I HJ\ TEO
CONSTRUCTION
GRANTS
(3,319,000)
(3 ,319,000)
(3,319,000)
Revision 1
Revision 2
ALLJ~lnoN
OF APPROPRIATIONS
AND RESERVES
(1 • 617 • 848)
2,011.075
393,227
\80,000\ 93,000
(12 ,079)
(185,079)
(237 ,000)
28,852
(208. Jl18)
1/24/79
J/26/79
(6)
(UNAPPROPRIATED BAL
AVAILABLE) OR
ADDITIONAL FUNDING
REQUIRED
(5)
1,000,000
88,418
l,088,lil8
27,624
27,624
1, 116,042
(1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver).
Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This Item ls fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued In future years If
consolidation occurs.
(2) The fol lowing 1978-79 capital budget Items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth:
(a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$6,000: This Item is funded annually from industrial user charges.
(b) Capital funds "operating costs" -$3,800: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues.
(c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$299,801: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary
savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges.
(3) Hiscel laneous Projects.
(4) Revised Cost Estimate.
(5) If full secondary treatment requirement Is not waived, an additional $1,108,000 in local funds will be required.
J
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICT NO. 7 or ORANGE COUNTY
CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW
Revlslun I
Revision 2
1/24/79
1/26/79
(I)
TOTAL
FUNDS
REQUIRED
(2) (3) (4)
6)
(5) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL
1978-79 BALANCE TO ESTIMATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR
-....,_; DUOGET BE PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING
TREATMENT PLANT-(1)
Plant Expansion
Appropriation for Trmt. Facllltles to
Comply with State & Federal Regs.
Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities
TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION
MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND
ITEHS-(2)
Unappropriated Reserve
SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND
Appropriation for District Improvements
SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
Tustin-Orange 17, 18 & Hewes/Chapman
Tustin-Orange 17, 18
Tustin-Orange, 19, 20
Michelson Sub-Trunk
South Irvine Lift Station
South Irvine Sub-Trunk
Replace Pu~ps at Navy Way Station
Appropriation for District Improvements
Unappropriated Reserve
SUB-TOTAL FR FUND
TOTAL MASTER PLAN
BONDED DEBT
1951 Issue:
· •ds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
, •rest ~orlzed General Reserve
1962 Issue:
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
1970 Issue:
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
TOTAL BONDED DEBT
LIABILITY FOR JOS
TOTAL JOS
GRAND TOTAL
9,909,000
9,909,000
253,831-(4)
302,8i.1-m
365,000-(4)
200,000-(4)
250,000-(4)
200,000-(4)
10,000
630,000-(3)
2,211,678
2,211,678
150,000
18,280
168,280
2,41fO,OOO
624,370
),06fi,370
3,500,000
1,207,200
4,707,200
7,939,850
20,200
20,200
20,080,728
APPROPR I A Tl ON
(2,622,035)
(2,201,000) J
( 1. 754 ,000)
(6,577 ,035)
(2,031,9l'i)
(2,031,914)
(liOS,456) I
(li08 ,456)
(253,331)
( 150,000)
(10,000) I (920,000) I
(779,549)
(2, 113 ,380)
(4,553,750)
(13 ,000)
(3,693)
(lli,765)
(31,458)
(130,000)
(86,41io)
(77' 134)
{293,574)
(225,000)
(211,252)
(352 ,251)
. (788,503)
(l, 113,535)
(14,700) ,
I
(14, 700) I
(12,259,020)
OR (ArrROPRIATED) GRANTS AND RESEtl.VES REQUIRED
7,286,965 (4,873,000) (2,413,965)
(3.955,000) 3,955,000
3,331,965 (4,873,000) 1,541,035
(2,0JI ,914) 2,031,911f
(2,031,914) 2,031,914
(li08,li56) 408,456
(408,456) 4o8,li56
302,8li7 302,847-(6)
365,000 365,000-(6)
50,000 (50,000)
250,000 250,000
200,000 200,000
(290,0:>0) 572,396 282,396
(779,549) 779,5'i9
98,298 1,301,945 1,li00,243
(2,342,072) 3,742,315 1,400,243
137,000 (137,000)
l'i,587 14,587
( 14 '765) lli,765
136,822 (122,235) 14,587
2,310,000 (2,310,000)
537.930 537,930
(77,13'1) 77,13lf
2,770,796 (2,232,866) 537.930
3,275,000 (3 ,275. 000)
995.948 995,948
(352,251) 352,251
3,918,697 (2,922,749) 995,948
6,826,315 (5,277 ,850) 1,548,465
5,500 (5,500)
5,500 (5,500)
7,821,708 (4 ,87.3 ,000) 2,948,708
(I) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver).
Purchase and sale of joint ~1orks equity has been omitted. This Item ls fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years If
consolidation occurs.
(2) The following 1978-79 capital budget Items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth:
(a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$8,000: This Item Is funded annually from industrial user charges.
(b) Caplt<il funds "operating costs11 -$28,000: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues.
(c) Transfer to Operating f'und • $400,535: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary
savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges.
(d) Transfer ACO to f'O $5,518: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate similar transfer In 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary savings and
additional revenue.
~Miscellaneous projects.
(4) Revised cost estimate.
(5) If full secondary treatment requirement is not waived an additional$ 1,626,000 in local funds will be required,
(6) To serve users presently outside the District. To be paid for from annexation and connection fees.
(5)
.J ',. .I .•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. II OF ORANGE COUNTY
CONSOLIDATION BUDGET REVIEW
Revision 1 1/24/79
Revision 2 1/26/79
(6)
( 1)
TOTAL
FUNDS
REQUIRED
(2) (3) (4) (5) (UNAPPROPRIATED BAL
1978-79 BALANCE TO ESTIMATED ALLOCATION AVAILABLE) OR
BUDGET BE PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL FUNDING
TREATMENT PLANT -(1)
Plant Expansion
Appropriation for Trmt. Plant Facilities
to Comply with State & Federal Regs.
Appropriation for Non-Grant Funded Facilities
TOTAL PLANT EXPANSION
MASTER PLAN TRUNK SEWERS & OTHER CAPITAL FUND
ITEHS -(2)
Ocean Avenue Trunk
Coast Highway Trunk, Reach I and Portion of
Reach 2 and Newland St. Interceptor
Coast Highway Trunk, Portion of Reach 2
Warner Ave. Relief Sewer
Appropriation for District Improvements
SUB-TOTAL ACO FUND
Slater Pump Station Upgrade and New Foree Hain
Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 3
Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach li
Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 5
Edwards Trunk, Reach 1
Golden West Interceptor
Coast Hwy. Trunk -Reach 6
Edwards Trunk, Reaches 2 &
Warner Ave. Sewer Purchase
Mcfadden Ave. Relief Sewer
Edinger Ave. Interceptor
Hell Ave. Relief Sewer
Graham St. Sewer Purchase
~--lngdale Trunk Sewer
SUB-TOTAL FR FUND
TOTAL HASTER PLAN
BONDED DEBT
1951 Issue:
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
1958 Issue:
Bonds Outstanding @ 6/30/78
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
TOTAL BOHDED DEBT
GRAND TOTAL
7 ,871,000
7,871,000
50,000
4,000,000-(4)
1,400,000-(4)
230,000
375,000-(3)
6,055,000
400,000-(5)
850,000-(4)
501 ,000
1,000,000
900,000-(4)
309,000
1,489,000
600,000-(li)
250,000
12li,OOO
100,000
156,000
lOli,000
670,000
7,453,000
13,508,000
lli8,000
19,050
167,050
700,000
129,750
829,750
996,800
22,375,800
APPROPRIATION
(2, 137,967)
(1,795,000)
(1,430,000)
(5,362,967)
(50,000)
(2,201,000)
(230,000)
(I ,255,li99)
(3,736,li99).
-o-
(3,736,499) I
(12,000)
(3,550)
(13,700)
(29,250)
(50,000)
(22 ,500)
(46,501)
( 119,001)
(148,251) I
(9,247,717) I
OR (APPROPRIATED) GRANTS ANO RESERVES REQUIRED
5,733,033 (3 ,871,000) (1,862,033)
~ (3,225,000) 3,225,000
2,508,033 (3,871,000) 1,362,967 -o-
~ 3,199,:>00 (3,480,000) '281,000
(880,li99) 931,832 51,333
2,318,501 (3,480,000) 1,212,832 51,333
400,000 (400,000)
850,000 (850,000)
501,000 501,000
1,000,000 1,000,000
900,000 900,000
309,000 309,000
1,489,000 1,489,000
600,000 (600,000)
250,000 250,000
124,000 124,ooo
100,000 100,000
156,000 156,000
104,000 104,000
670,000 670,000
7,453,000 (1,850,000) 5,603,000
9,771,501 (3,480,000) (637, 168) 5,654,333
136,000 ( 136,ooo)
15,500 15,500
(13,700) 13,700
137,800 (122 ,300) 15,500
650,000 (650,000)
107,250 107,250
(46,501)
710,749 (603,499) 107,250
848,549 (725,799) 122,750
13,128,083 (7,351,000) -0-5,777,083
( 1) 1978-79 Budget 5-year cash flow adjusted to delete 100 HGD secondary treatment (assume receipt of waiver).
Purchase and sale of joint works equity has been omitted. This item is fully funded for 1978-79 and would be discontinued in future years If
consolidation occurs.
(2)
(3)
(I"
The following 1978-79 capital budget items have been omitted from the above for the reasons set forth:
(a) ICR payment to Federal Government -$7.000: This item is funded annually from industrial user charges.
(b) Capllill funds "operating costs" -$25.ltOO: Expenses are nominal and funded from annual revenues.
(c) Transfer to Operating Fund -$li59,391i: To cover Prop. 13 shortfall. Anticipate a similar transfer in 1979-80, partially offset by budgetary
savings and additional revenue, pending determination re user charges.
Miscellaneous Projects.
~evised cost estimate
~cw Project
(6) If full secondary treatment requirement Is not w;ilvcd, an additional $1.292,000 In loc<1l funds will be required.
(7) SWRCB has authorized the Districts to file an application for construction grant on this project.
(6)
RESOLUTIONS· A~JD· SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FEBRUARY 14; 1979 -7:30 P.M.
: JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 16, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WAlmANTS ------
· 1353
~354
44355
44356
44357
44358
44359
44360
44361
44362
44363
44364
44365
44366
44367
44368
44369
44370
44371
44372
44373
44374
44375
44376
. 44377
·37g
~79
44380
44381
44382
44383
44384
44385
44386
44387
4438S
44389
44390
44391
44392
44393
44394
44395
~4396
44397
44398
44399
44400
44401
44402
'03
"""'04
"A-1"
A-1 Mc-tnl Services Corp., Motor Pnrts $
A.S.C.E., Conference Registration Fee
Allied Colloids, Chemicals
Allied Supply Co., Valves
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Truck Parts
Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies
Bank Amcricard, EPA Meeting Expense
Banning Battery Co., Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Electrical Supplies
Bierly & Associates, Inc., Workers' Comp. Administration
Bird Machine Co., Inc., freight
Black & Decker Mfg. Co., Small Tools
Blue Diamond Materials, Sand Mix
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
W.C. Brooke, Employee Mileage ·
H.B. Brown Co., Expansion Tank
C & R Reconditioning Co., Engine Repair
CS Company, Plug Valves
State of California, State Unemployment Taxes
California Distributors, Small Tools
Art Carr Transmission, Truck Repair
Case Power & Equipment, Truck Parts
Cc~tifietl Laboratories, Janitorial Supplies
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline
Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premiums
College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County of Orange, Pre-Employment Exams
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Workers'· Comp. Fund
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Crane Packing Co., Crane Repair
Charles P. Crowley Co., Engine Parts
Daily Pilot, Legal Advertising
Daniels Tire Service, Truck Parts
Deco, Wire Supply
Delaval-Barks<lale Controls Division, Freight
George DeMatteo, Employee Mileage
Dennis Printers, Inc., Printing
Derby's Topsoil, Base Material
Dunn-Edwards Corp., Paint Supply
The Duriron Co., Inc., Pump Parts
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Envirotech-Sparling, Electrical Repairs
Federal Envelope Co., Office Supplies
Fischer G Porter Co., Controls
Fisher Scicnti fie Co., Chemicals
Foremost Threaded Products, Small llardwnrc
Cit)' of Fountain Valley, Water Uscngc
The Foxboro Co., clcctricnl Supplies
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
636.00
100.00
18,720.00
1,406.83
168.02
592.78
102.63
125.04
157.97
1,800.00
62.35
58.41
338.66
13.00
24.90
40.90
815.00
80.70
7,873.41
41.93
257.20
63.83
259.00
1,023.74
30,204.00
578.66
749. 02
8.384.17
191. 54
2,626.85
256.08
1,084.00
185.16
267.08
9.77
124.19
192. 71
25.65
33·.s4
1,274.73
1,282.60
117. 02
153.78
98.48
3,000.00
224.33
173. 71
1,098.59
38.14
271. 54
828.78
115. 98
II A-1"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID .JANUARY 16, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
44405
44406
44407
44408
44409
44410
44411
44412
44413
44414
44415
44416
44417
44418
44419
44420
44421
44422
44423
44424
44425
44426
44427
44428
44429
44430
44431
44432
4443"3
44434
44435
44436
44437
44438
44439
44440
44441
44442
44443
44444
44445
44446
44447
44448
44449
44450
44451
44452
44453
44454
44455
441156
44457
II A-2"
France Compressor Products, Compressor Parts
City of Fullerton, Water Uscagc
General Telephone Co., Telephone
Goldcnwest Fcrtili zer Co., Sludge Hauling
Gould, Inc.-Warrcn & Baily Division, Pump Parts
Halprin Supply Co., Safety Equipment
Hasty Alignment, Truck Repair
Heat and Power Equipment Co., Electrical Supplies
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Car Leasing
Hertz Equipment Rental, Crane Rental
David A. Hodgson, Employee Mileage
Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Co.,.Chemicals
City of Huntington Beach, Water Useagc
Ideal Sawdust Co., Inc., Sawdust
Inland Empire Equipment Co., Truck Parts
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Useage
Jensen Instrument Co., Electrical Supplies
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearing Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies
James P. Kinney Co., Engine Parts
Kicen-Li.ne Corp., Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Steel Supply
L.A. Liquid Handling Systems, Pump Parts
LBWS, Inc., Demurrage
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
Lewco Electric Co., Truck Parts
Lifecom-Safety Servi~e Supply, First Aid Supplies
VOID
Los Angeles Times, Classified Advertising
McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Small Tools.
Morgan Equipment Co., Truck Parts
E.B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers
Nasco, Water Core Sampler
Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals
National Electrical Mfg~ Association, Electrical Supplies
National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware
Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies
City of Newport Beach, Water Useage
Sy Nielson Service, Lab Supplies
Oakitc Products, Inc., Janitorial Supplies
Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Lumber
Orange County Farm Supply Co., Chemicals
Orange County Water District, Water Useago
Parkson, Inc., Pipe S~pplies
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Postmaster, Postngc ·
Power. Ddvos & Cha.in Co., Engine Parts
Harold Pr.imrose Ice, Sampling Ico
The Pryor G.iggcy Co., Freight
Quality Building Supply, Sand
Quality TypC\\lri ~er Maintcn~incc, Maintcn:rncc Contract
AGENDA ITEM #3 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
2,317.14
46. 74
3,502.11
2,953.20
66.95
49.57
132.44
604.33
819.23
857.97
11. 25
2,079.92
1,370.52
479.54
103.88
10.66
3.58
704.37
382.45
454.56
128.23
166.89
265.08
427.60
154.23
1,237.06
-211. 90
126. 78'
.oo
38 .. 06
430.39
232.43
81.04
221.54
74~16
1,439.78
25.00
49.15
59.15
10.80
180.00
550.35
695.52
84.27
4,674.00
58.30
37.84
500.00
55.00
15.90
49.85
667.80
102.Stl
"A-2"
u
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 16, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPEl~J\TING FUND WARRANTS
\___/158
4'1459
44460
44461
44462
44463
44464
44465
44466
44467
44468
44469
44470
44471
44472
44473
44474
44475
44476
44477·
44478
44479
44480
. 44481
. ~482
~483
44484
44485
44486
44487
44488
44489
44490
44491
44492
44493
II A-3"
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Disposal
Charles C. Regan Co., Pave Pump Station
Relief Printing Co., Printing Service
Research & Education Association, Publicatiori
Robbins & Myers, Engine Parts
Rubber-Tread, Inc., Safety Supplies
Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Caustic Spill Deductible
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair
Scars, Roebuck and Co., Electrical Supplies
See Optics, Safety Glasses
Shepherd Machinery Co., Grader Repair
South Orange Supply, Paint Supply
Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power
Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas
Southern Counties Oil Co., Fuel
Southland Sweeping, Inc., Sweeper Rental
Starow Steel, Steel Stock
Super Chem Corp., Chemicals
The Suppliers, Small Tools
Thompson Lacquer Co., Paint Supplies
Tru Supply Co., Sheetings
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck P~rts
Un1on Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Delivery Service
Utilities Supply Co., Small Tools
VBA Cryogenics, Cylinder Rental
Valley Cities Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
John R. Waples, Odor ·Control Services
Carl Warren & Co., Self Insurance Premium
Western Salt Co., Lab Salt
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services
Worthington Pump Corp., Pump Parts
James Wybenga, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corp., Xerox Reproduction
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
115 .10
2,336.00
55.65
41.70
3,343.99
242.53
250.00
1,966.56
38.80
95.42
1,887.30
70.60
13,764.20
3,704.06
4,757.81
280.00
1,224.14
784.40
33.87
190.97
373.12
532.88
22.84
29.28
101.45
187.41
2,163.20
219.20
900.00
136.35
706. 77
5,218.10
724.01
9.60
4,189.23
164.30
$169,214.29
"A-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID ~JANUARY 16, 1979
WAlmANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FlJNO WARRANTS
44342
44343
44344
44345
44346
44347
44348
44349
44350
44351
44352
"A-4"
Arrow Truck Bodies ft Equipment, Flatbed V-170. $
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Assignee of: Catalytic, Inc.
Daily Pilot, Legal PW-069
Eastman, Inc., Office Files
J.B. Gilbert & Associates, EIS/EIR
Contract P2-23-2
C.H. Leavell & Co., Stop Notice Release
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., EDP Monitoring
Rockwell International, Hydrant Meter
Southern Calif. Coastal Water, Waiver
Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing P2-23~5
Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Spray Gun
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
·,
AGENDA ITEM·#8 -ALL DISTRICTS
'•
AMOUNT
1,529.74
2,451,060.00
63.27
2,509.27
1.460.55
2,008.63
19,447.71
384.47
12,462.00
373.16
551.20
$2,491,850.00
$2,661,064.29
"A-4"
u
:
'-r<RRANT NO.
INDIVJDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAIO .JANUARY 16, 1979
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED C/\P ITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
44336 Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co., Inspection 2-19 & 2-20 $ 1,507.10
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND
IN. FAVOR OF
44337 T.W. Hawkins; Damage Settlement
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 Operating Fund
•·. DISTRICT NO. 3
RRANT NO.
\,,,.,/
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
44338
44339
44340
Boyle Engineering Corp., Survey 3-13-1, 3-20-3, and 3-20-4
Sladden Engineering, ·Test 3-20-3
Smith Emery Co., Test 3-13-1
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO Fund
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
44341 County of Orange, Relocation of Sewer
. ..·•
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7
·....._;
"B" AGENDA ITEM #3 -ALL DISTRICTS
$ 1,507.10
AMOUNT
$ 1,355.00
$ 1,355.00
AMOUNT
$25,105.00
175.00
2,040.00
$27,320.00
$28,675.00
AMOUNT
$ 4,263.52
$4,263.52
"B"
JOINT IHSTRlCTS CLAIMS PAilJ .J/\Nl.l/\RY 30, 1979
WArmANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WJ\(m/\NTS
44515
44516.
44517
44518
4'4519
44520
44521
44522
44523
44524
44525
44526
44527
44528
44529
44530
44531
44532
44533
445:54
44535
44536
44537
44538
44539
44540
44541
44542
44543
44544
44545
44546
44547
44548
44549
44550
44551
44552
44553
44554
44555
44556
44557
44558
44559
44560
44561
44562
44563
44564
44565
44566
44567
44568
II C-l"
A-A & D Electronic Snles, Lab Supplies $
Air California, Air Fare
American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts
The Anchor Packing Co., Sheet Packing
A11ixtcr Pruzan, Electrical Supplies
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Blades
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Membership Dues
Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies
Associated Auto & Truck Parts Co., Truck Parts
Banning Battery Co., Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Electrical Supplies
.L.W. Bemis Tractor & Implements, Guide Bar
Benz Engineering, Inc., Valve Parts
Berkley Controls, Inc., Electrical Supplies
Bierly & Associates, Inc., Workers' Comp. Administration
blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt Mix
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts
Busin~ss Publisher, Inc., Publication
CS Company, Valves
Juan Cabrera, M.D., S.H.P. Payment
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
~alif. Assoc. of Sanitation Agencies, Membership Dues
Chevron.U.S.A., Inc., Gasoline
City Wide Office Machinery, Adding Machine Repair
Cla-Val Company, Engine Parts
College Lumber Co. , Inc., Lumber
Warren Collins Co., Inc., Windscreens
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies
Construction Scheduling Course, Construction Seminar
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
D.M.E., Inc., Exhaust Assembly
Daniels Tite Service, Truck Tires
Deco, Lantern
DeGuclle & Sons Glass.Co., Glass Supply
Dennys Air Conditioning & Heating, Electrical Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Federal Envelope Co., Envelopes
Fibre Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Paint Supplies
Filter Supply Co., Engine Parts
Fischer & Porter Co., Plumbing Supplies
Flo-Systems, Truck Parts
Fountain Valley Camera, Film Processing
The Foxboro Co., Registration
City of Fullerton, Water Uscage
GW Maintenance, Inc., Gas lloses
General Electric Co., Electricnl Supplies
General Telephone Co., Telephone
Gcorg:in Pac.ific, Lumber
.John Haslett Co., Filter Elements
Haul -/H·rny Con~ci incrs, Trash Di spos:i l
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supply
AGEnDA ITEM #8 -ALL DI STP.I CTS
AMOUNT
95.40
65.00
138.54
967.64
330.64
185.50
3,375.00
270.16
813.86
359.73
75.10
34.72
1,541.53
52.20
900.00
68.22
98.58
12.00
228.20
156.00
169.70
1,610.00
1,297.86
74.68
135.04
508.56
345.98
249.36
525.00
1,643.00
69.00
422.79
1,725.00
91.63
502.96
273.52
25.14
120.00
48.23
185.12
55.63
438.93
1, 151. 64
188.42
154.61
1,200.00
38.36
68 .13
137.27
673.76
764. 64
1,227.91
495.00
2,331.61.
"C-1"
u
u
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 30, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
'14569
~4570
44571 ·
44572
4~573
44574
44575
44576
44577
44578
44579
44580
44581
44582
44583
44584
44585
44586
44587
44588
44589
44590
44591
44592
. 44593
•4594
~4595
44596
44597
44598
44599
44600
44601
44602
44603
44604
44605
44606
•44607
44608
44609
44610
44611
. 44612
. 44613
44614
44615
44616
44617
44618
"4619
~620
44621
44622
44623
"C-2"
llun<lley Company, Inc., Electrical Supplies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
ICC Instrument Co., Motor Repair
Instrumentation Specialties, Electrical Supplies
International Business ~lachincs, Office Supplies
International llarvestcr Co., Truck Parts
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pipe Supply
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves
King Bearing, Inc., Bearing Supplies
L.B.W.S., Inc., Welding Supplies
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
Lance Speedometer Service, Speedometer Repair
Larry's Bldg. Materials, Inc., Cone Blocks
Larsen-Hogue, Electrical Supplies
Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing
Lcwco Electric Co., Truck Parts
McCoy Ford Tractor, Truck Parts
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Wire Rope
Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprint Reproduction
Miller Machinery Co., Transformer Repair
Morgan Equipment Co., Truck Parts
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nolex Corp., Paper Products .
Orange Valve & Fitting Co., Electrical Supplies
Pacific Telephone Co., Signal Circuits
Pacific Wire Products of Calif., Small Hardware
Pak West, Paint Supplies
Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts
M.C. Patten Corp., Pressure Gauges
Paul-Munroe Hydraulics, Inc., Valve Springs
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Pitney Bowes, Postage Meter Rental
Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice
Printec Corp., Blueprint Supplies
Process Four, Printing of District Maps
Productool, Inc., Electrical Supplies
The Pryor Giggey Co., Concrete Supply
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Metal Stock
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Sieves
Shepherd Machinery Co., Truck Parts
Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
Signal-Flash Co., Signal Flasher Rental
South Orange Supply, Plumbing Supplies
Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power
Southern Calif. Gas Co., Natural Gas
Southern Calif. Water Co., Water
Southern Counties Oil Co., Diesel Fuel
Sparkletts Dd nking \fatc:1· Corp., llottled Water
Starow Steel, Steel Stock
Super Chem Corp., Janitorial Suppllcs
The Suppliers, Safety Supplies
J. Wayne Sylvester, Pctt)'.Cash
TFJ Building M:itcrials, Valve Pnrts
Taylor-Dunn, Electrical Supplies
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
460.03
10.13
25.00
110. 87
17.17
27.24
66.78
188.86
392.11
419.15
1,227.07
58.40
212.00
1,231.26
2~:~g
151.19
220.83
7.95
169.60
237.46
5.90
75.65
66.60
307.43
161.07
166.12
1,670.23
322.88
13.56
525.75
73.14
18.00
107.27
326.75
171. 87
420.81
1,177.74
79.96
92.05
3,022.90
933 .16
90.00
31.39
92,078.30
623.94
7.57
3,071.53
244.29
175.92
524.70
688.56
606.13
807.96
588.'14
"C-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 30, 1979
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPEn/\TING FUND WARRANTS
44624
44625 .
44626
44627
44628
44629
44630
44631
44632
·44633
44634
44635
44636
44637
44638
44639
44640
"C-3"
C.O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Travel Buffs, Air Pare
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
J.G. Tucker li Son, Inc., Oxygen Supply
United Industrial Supply, Inc., Thermometer
United Parcel Service, Delivery
Valley Cities Supply Co., Pipe Supply
VWR Scientific, Lah Supplies
Waukesha Engine Scrviccntcr, Engine Parts
Wesco, Electrical Supplies
West Chemical Products, Inc., Office Supplies
VOID
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction
George Yardley Associates, Water Gauges
Donald Winn, CASA Conference Expense
Frances Wood, Compensation & Mileage
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
.,.
AGENDA ITE~ #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
.,
AMOUNT
$ 164.07 u
114. 00
1,372. 00
229.27
53.00
16.60
1,094.57
214.80
232.22
258.97
66.55
.OD
145.33
1,655.92
156.14
100.00
395.60
$149,526.56
u
"C-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JANUARY 30, 1979
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY HEVOLVING FUND WARRANTS.
4506 ~4507
44508
44509
44510
44511
44512
44513
44514
"C-4"
Associated of Los Angeles, Test Equipment $
Calingua, Inc., Contract J-6-lF
John Carollo Engineers, P2-24 Design
John Carollo Eng./ Greeley and Hansen, P2-23 Construction
County of Orange, Lab Analysis I-IR
McMastcr-Carr Supply Co., Air Hose Reel
Peat, Marwick, ~litchell & Co., Revenue Program
J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower
Utilities Supply Co., Drill
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
688.33
18,420.30
34, 165. 72
14,674.89
8.17
310.14
17,563.41
402 .. 80
487.71
$86,721.47
$236,248.03
"C-4"
IND I VI DUAL DISTIU CTS CLAIMS PAJD JANUARY 30, 1979
WARR/\NT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
44502 County of Orange, Lab Analysis, Contract 2-19 an<l 2-20
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT.NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
44503 Charles C. Regan Co., Resurfacing
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
44504 · County of Orange, Lab Analysis 3-20-3
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
44505 State of California, Annex 83 Processing Fee
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7
"D" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AMOUNT
450.13
450.13
AMOUNT
2,540.00
2,540.00
AMOUNT
344.89
344.89
2,884.89
AMOUNT
145.00
. 145. 00
"D"
u
u
"E~'
:
RESOLUTION NO. 79-14
AWARDING JOB NO. J-3-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INSTALLA-
TION OF GAS ENGINES WITii GEAR DRIVES AT R011fROCK OUTFALL
BOOSTER STATION, JOB NO. J-3-1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written reconunendation this day submitted to the Boards
of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to
PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. for INSTALLATION OF GAS ENGINES WI'TII GEAR DRIVES AT
ROTHROCK OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, JOB NO. J-3-1, and the bid tabulation and
proposal submitted for said work are hereby receiyed and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. J-3-1 be awarded to Pascal &
Ludwig, Inc. in the total amount of $247,225.00 in accordance with the terms of
thier bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work
pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
AGENDA ITEM #9CB) -ALL DISTRICTS
"' A.,
D I J) 'J~ /\ n lJ J, /\ 'J' I 0 N
It'ebruury 0 t 1979 s JI g J~ 'r 11:00 l\. M •
• • . JOll NO. J-3-1
INSTJ\LLl\TION 01~ Gl\S ENGINI;;s WIT II GEAR DlUVES AT
l'flOJEC'l' 'rl'l1 LE RO'l'JIHOCI~ OlJ'l'Fl\LL DOOSrrER f; '1'1\. '11 I ON
PHOJECT DE~CflIPTION Installation. of enqines and qcar drives,
removal and replacement of pumps, and miscellaneous other work.
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 479,922.00
---
CONTR.7\CTOR
l. P~scal & 'Ludwig, Inc.
Upland, CA
2 • Triad .Mechanical, Inc ..
Stanton, CA
.3° Waldinger Corporation
· Des Moines , Iowa
4. Equinox Malibu
· Malibu, CA ·
. ·
DUDGE'l'. /\MOUN'!' $ -------
-·-----
TO'l1AL DID
$247,225 .. 00
321,123.00
..
329,745,00
349, 500 .. 00
I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to Pascal &
Ludwig, Inc. of Upland, California in the bid amount of $247,225.00,
as the lowest and best bid.
"F"
~~-s----Pr -~-~=--c::\--t~·~
Donald Bogart ',\
Senior Engineer
the above recommendation.
AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "F"
v .
.•
RESOLUTION NO. 79-15
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE
SPRINKLING SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P\\7-070
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, .1 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE
SPRINKLING SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
'Ibe Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' Chief Engineer,
.. for FIRE SPRINKLING SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT PLANT.NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-070,
are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section·2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
.
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
II G" AGENDA ITEM # 9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS
~I H"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-16
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lF AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND
11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DIGESTER
GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL·PUMPING STATION,
JOB NO. J-6-lF, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 1hat the contractor, Caliagua, Inc., has completed the work in
accordance with the terms of the contract for DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN
OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lF, on January 24, 1979; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended ,.
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
u
filed; and, U
' Section 3. 1hat Job No. J-6-lF is hereby accepted as complete in ·accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 28, 1978; and,
Section 4. ·That the Chairman of District ~o. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Cali~gua, Inc. setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Digester Gas Piping System at
Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lF, is hereby approved; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. ~ are hereby authorized and directed to execute
said' agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
AGENDA ITEM # 9CE) -ALL DISTRICTS II H"
u
:
RESOLUTION NO, 79-17
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH OCWD FOR DATA SEARCH RE
WATER REUSE STUDY
A RESOLUTION OF TliE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHOR-
ING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT FOR DISTRICTS TO PERFORM DATA SEARCH IN
CONJUNCTION WITH ORANGE AND LOS ANGELES COUNTIES
WATER REUSE STUDY AND PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT
OF SAID DATA SEARCH COSTS TO THE DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are·parties to that
certain joint powers agreement dated June 27, 1978, with County Sanitation Districts
of Los Angeles County, Orange CoWlty Water District, The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California, City of Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles Department
of Water and Power to conduct a regional water resuse (reclamation) study of the
Orange/Los Angeles Metropolitan area; and,
WHEREAS, the joint powers authority has requested that a data search relative
to said study be conducted by Districts' staff personnel;and,
WHEREAS, the joint powers water reuse study is the recipient of a State,and
Federal. grant· for said study, which said grant conditions require the grant
administering member of the joint powers authority to enter into a contract with
the performing agency for any reimbursable work to be performed by said agency; and,
WHEREAS, the Orange County Water District is the grant administering member of
the water reuse study joint powers authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
I, 2, 3, s·, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and between
~~~~~~~~
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County and the Orange County Water
\._,) District for performance of data search by Sanitation Districts' personnel relative
to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study and providing for reimbursement
"l-1" AGENDA ITEM # 9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "l~l"
of said data search costs incurred by Sanitation Districts, be, and is hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby
authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation
Districts Nos. ?, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
'
"1-2" ·AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "l-2"
-2-
:
RESOLUTION NO. 79-18
ADOPTING PREVAILING WAGE RATES TO BE PAID BY
CONTRACTORS AS DETERMINED BY DIRECTOR OF THE
STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNfY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE PREVAILING RATES OF WAGES TO BE
PAID TO ALL WORKERS EMPLOYED ON PUBLIC WORKS
CONTRACTS WITHIN THE DISTRICTS AS DETERMINED
BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, UNTIL THE AMENDMENT OR
REVOCATION OF THIS RESOLUTION
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, Section 1771 of the Labor Code of the State of California requires
that not less than the general preva~~ing rate of per diem wages shall be paid to
all workers employed on public works contracts; and,
WHEREAS, Section 1770 of the Labor Code of The State of California requires
that the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations shall determine
the prevailing rate of per diem wages for the locality; and,
WHEREAS, the Director has determined and published the prevailing rate of
per diem wages for Orange County; and,
WHEREAS, Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California requires
that any body awarding any contract for public works shall obtain from the State
Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
and general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in the locality in which
the public work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of
workers needed to execute the contract, and further allows such public body to
incorporate, by reference thereto, said prevailing rates in the Notice Inviting
Bids, specifications and contract, and indicate that a copy is on file in the
~ office of the Secretary of the Districts rather than setting forth said per diem ·
rates in each call for bids, in the bid specifications and in the contract itself.
'..,/ NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
"J-1". AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "J-1"
\ 'i.
' .
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1. That the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each
craft, classification, or type of workers needed to execute public works contracts
and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work for each craft,
classification, or type of workers are in accordance with the schedules determined
and published by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations, and
are on file in the office of the Secretary of the Boards of Directors; and,
Section 2. That a copy, of this resolution shall be posted at each jobsite
prior to the conunencement of any work; and,
Section 3. That Resolution No. 78-38 and any other resolutions, motions or
portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979
~------------'--~~~----
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "J-2"
-2-
"K''
..
RESOLUTION NO. 79-23-2
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLIVE
SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION .DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OLIVE SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-1:
(SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING)
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors_ by Lowry and Associations, for OLIVE
SUB-TRUNK REPAIR, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR-l, (SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING), are hereby
approved and adopted: and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health. and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Chief Engineer
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
AGENDA ITEH #9CL) -DISTRICT NO. 2 "K"
"L"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-25-2
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY
DISTRICT RIGHT OF .WAY TO LOS CABALLEROS
RACQUET AND SPORTS CLUB, LTD.,ET AL.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 of ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF LICENSE TO OCCUPY DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY
TO LOS CABALLEROS RACQUET AND SPORTS CLUB,
LTD.,ET AL. RE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
RIGHT OF WAY
* * * * * * * * * * * *
\
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California,.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain License to Occupy Right of Way
dated , granting Los Caballeros Racquet and Sports
Club, Ltd., et al. the right to occupy District's right of way for
the Santa Ana River Interceptor in the vicinity of the westerly
river bank south of Warner, is hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said License to Occupy Right
of Way, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED.at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT NO. 2 II L"
t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 -108114 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALifORNIA 92708
CHft.NGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A
--~~--~----------------
~ c. o. N0. __ ~4----------------~
CONTRACTOR: Kordick & Rados, 1\ Joint Venture ·DATE February 7, 1979
KNO'I'T INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OP REACH 7, CON'l'R/\CT NO. 3-20-3
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 7,215.94
-----~~~--~--~-
In accordanc.e with controct provisions, the following clwnges in the contrQct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated July 11, 1978,
January 4, 1979, May 2, 1978, and January•9, 1979.
ADD:
1.
2.
Relocate fire line at Station 689+47
Contractor encountered a 6" water main not
shown on the plans. 'rhis water main goes
into the J_,a Palma Junior High School property.
~or bypa.ss and removal of water main
3. At Station 737+98±, Contractor encountered
a 2" water main not shown on the plans. For
~ bypass and remo~al of water main
4. At Station 751+00±, Contractor encountered
traffic signal conduits not shown on the plans.
For removal and replacement of the traffic
conduits
s. Contractor encountered extra work due to debris
at connection to Job No. 3-20-2 at Station
668+50±.
· . ...
TOTAL ADD:
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
:contract. time for the above items: 3 calcndnr days
•
"M-1" AGENDA .ITEM #9(0) -DISTRICT NO. 3
$ 750.01
$2,660.33
$2,220.68
$ 773.47
$ 811.45
$7,215.94
"M-1"
COUNTY S/\NITATlON l>ISTRJCTS OF OR/\NGE COUNTY
P. 0. UOX 8127 -108'1'1 Cl.LIS /\Vl:NUE
F 0 lJ NT A I I~ VAL LC Y / C /\ L J F 0R1-J I /\ <J 2 I 0 8
...
CHANGE ORDEI~ GR/\NT NO. ___ N/._A _______ _
CONTRACTOR; Kordick & Hados, 1\ ,7oi.nt Venture
C.O. NO. 4 ·u
DATE~~--~_..;.;F_c_b_r~u~a_r_y_7 __ ,~1~9~7~9~---
JOB:~--KN~O_T_T~I_N_T1_~n_c_E_·P_T_o_R~,~r_on_,T_I_o_N~O-F~R-E~_Ac_1_1_7~,~c_6_N_T_R1\_C_T~N_o_.~3_-_2_0_-3~~------~-------------
. .
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total •rime Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
,,.,, .
..
December 29, 1977
365 Calendar Days
December 28, 1978
3 Calendar Days
8 Calendar Days
373 Calendar Days
January 5, 1979
Or.i g i na 1 Contr<lct Price $ 3,880,113.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 3,034.00
This Chn.ngc (f\D D) ('):[=9Wf) $ 7,215.9'1
/\mended Contruct Price $ 3,890,362.94
---
Ooarcl i!Uthor i znt ion cliltc: February 14, 1979 /\pp rovc.~d:
"M-2"
COUlffY Sf\rJ IT /\TI ON DISTRICTS of
Ornnge County, CcJ 1 if orn in
Oy _________ ~----------~~-
Ch i e f [nfjincer
AGENDA ITEM #9(o) -DISTRICT NO .. 3 "M-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-28-11
AUTHORIZING FILING GRANT APPLICATIONS RE COAST
HIGHWAY AND NEWLAND STREET TRUNK SEWERS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANlTATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY OWNE WASTE-
WATER TREATMENT WORKS:RE.COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER
PORTION OF REACH 1 AND REACH 2, AND NEWLAND STREET
TRUNK SEWER, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the General Ma~ager is hereby authorized and directed to sign
and file, for and on behalf of County. Sanitation District No. 11, an Application for
. Federal Assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.) and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive
a grant under said act and a state grant under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970
~ and/or 1974 for construction of wastewater treatment works; and,
Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 11 hereby agrees and further
does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if grants for its
project are made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and state statutes, it will
comply with all applicable state and federal statuatory and regulatory requirements,
including but not limited to the Assurances contained in the Federal Grant Application
and the State Grant Contract, The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended,
relating to the right of the. public to obtain information and records, The National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, U.S.C. 470 et seq., as amended, relating to the
preservation of historic landmarks, The Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act, 18 U.S.C. 874,
40 U.S.C. 276c and the regulations issued thereunder, 29 CFR 3.1 et seq., and The
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 327 et seq., and the
regulations issued thereunder.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
"N" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICT #11 "N"
RESOLUTION NO. 79-19
AUTIIORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD CONTRACT
FOR JOB NO. PW-069 AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 78-197
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTIIORIZING TIIE GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD AND
EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR INTERIM SLUDGE FACILITY
SITE PREPARATION AT COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL,
JOB NO. PW-069, SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF EXECUTED
LAND USE AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE, GENERAL
SERVICES AGENCY, AND SOLID WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT
FROM COUNTY OF ORANGE, SOLID WASTE ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-197 RE
AWARD OF SAID JOB
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards
of Directors by the Districts' Chief Enginer that award of contract be made to
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for Interim Sludge Facility Site Preparation at
Coyote Canyon Landfill, Job No. PW-069, subject to receipt of executed land use
agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, for sewage solids
processing and disposal_ by Districts on County's Class II-2 landfill site, and
the solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement
Agency, as approved by the State Solid Waste Management Board; the tabulation of
bids; and the proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to award said contract to
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. in the total amount of $208,spo.oo, in accordance
with the terms of the~r bid and the prices contained therein, subject to receipt of
the executed land use agreement with County of Orange, General Services Agency, and
the solid waste discharge permit from County of Orange, Solid Waste Enforcement
Agency, as approved by the State Solid Waste Manage1'!1cnt Board; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed,
to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(n) -ALL DISTRICTS np-1 11
. . .
the provisions of the specifications and contract docwnents therefor, and the
stipulations set forth herein, in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. Tilat all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected;
and,
Section 5. Tilat Resolution No. 78-197 adopted on December 13, 1978, be, and
is hereby, rescinded and made of no further effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1979.
u
u
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(n) ALL DISTRICTS "P-2"
D I D T A n U L A T I 0 N
S JI E E 'l'
JOl3 NO. PW-069 ---IN'l'ERIM SE\·i/\GE SLUDGE Fl\CILITY SITE
December 13, 1978
11:00 l\.M.
PHEPARJ\'l'ION Nr COY01'E Cl\NYON Ll\NDFILL
PROJECT DESCnIPTION
~~~~----~~~:--~~~~---~~----~~~---
ENGINEEH 's ESTIM/\'l'E $ 150 I 000. 00 BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------
-~,.,.-.=s--=cz::i==-==r=====:::i:z=::x::z::::~=";""=======-··------
CONTRAC'l,OR TOTAL BID
=======~c-:;--===================--===========r====================:::::::::======
1. John·A. Artukovich Sons, Inc.
Azusa, CA
2 Sukut Construction •
Santa Ana, CA"
"Q" AGENDA ITEM· #llCn) -ALL DISTRICTS.
$20°8, 500. 00
$256,500.00
"Q"
BREl.\L, Inc.
401 S. BAE/\ BLVD.
BREA, CA. 92621
r-ru::n
In tho O!flco ot c ho ~<.·r.rP.t:iry
County Sanit..:at"'.m Pfr..,trict
No~ 2-~-----------~
JAN 1 0 1979
-------1·---·----{7_1_4_) _9_9_2-_2_1_2_1 _______ ··.._..19_.~'·-· ~:...Q~~·------
By.,.,.:;.. ~
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Alan G. S. West, Prosidr.nl
Michael D. CohC'n, C.P.A.
Don McRridc
Reverend noswcll C. McFadden
A William Mochon, C.P.A.
P. Oougl:ts Tripp
Carol D. Weddle
,,.
"R"
January ~~t · ·1979
Sanitation District #2 of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca~ 92708
Re: Breal, Inc o lfon-profi t, Low-Cost
Senior Citizen Housing Project
Honorable Board of Directors:
I am requesting an opportunity to speak before you at
your next regular meeting of January 10, 19'79.
The Brea Rotary Club and all local organizations are
building 30 units of low-cost housing for the senior
citizens of Brea without the aid of County, State or
Federal fundso The City has leased to our non-profit
corporation (Breal, Inc.) a piece of City owned property
for 50 years at a cost of $1~00 per year. When the
lease is up, all property and improvements enure to the
City. The City has waived all fees for this project.
All labor on the project is free and much of the mater-
ials is also free or at cost.
If we were to pay f'or land and improvements, the pro-
ject would cost approximately :1~900,000. The local
United California Bank in Brea has loaned to Breal, Inc.
$350,000, which we feel will complete the project.
Projected rents are approximately ~pl25 .oo per month per
unit because there is no profit motive involved.
The Breal Board is made up of 7 members, 5 Rotarians,
1 representative from the Brea Ministerial Association,
and 1 representative from the City of Brea selected by
the City Council.
We are within 30 days of ground breakingo We are asking
for relief of the usual sunitat1on fees connected with
this project at an approximate price of $6,6000
Thank you in advance.
,fl~:r.ds/1
, // dlictlf#~JJM ,:;:Klan G.; S-.--J.v est
President ·i . · . • I ., . ''rlf' 6L AGSW:g'tJ·'· (_.( r .. -·L. •
.. •• t •• •.'. •.
AGE~DA ITEM #29 -DISTqJCT 2 "R" I\
u
JOHN GEYMOl 111. M;1ynr
Mllll/\M Kl\ YWOO[), ~.1.1yor Pro Tc111
E. l.l.CWFLL YN ll\11. l<l IOLT, Jll .. Co1111c1l111:m
OB. WILLIAM I. KUTT, Counc1lm.111
CITY OF ANAHEIM. C/\l.IFOnNIA
Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
204 EAST LINCOUJ AVENUE
(714) &33·hG26
January 25, 1979
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Harper:
DON H. ROTH, Coun1:1tm<1n
At the Board of Directors meeting held on January 10, 1979 for
District No. 2 a request was received from the City of Brea for
a waiver of the sewer connection fees for a Senior Citizens
Hous.ing Development being constructed by a non-profit organization
on municipally owned land.
The Anaheim City Council at its meeting ·of January 16, 1979
passed a Motion by unanimous vote in support of County Sanitation
District No. 2 amending its Ordinances to permit a waiver of
sewer connection fees for projects being constructed on
municipally owned land.
I would appreciate your advising this off ice of any proposed
action regarding this matter so that we may give this proposal
our vigorous support.
Ver!£ .. t ul~ours,
~ \./ ~/fj/' /'!~'9~'7_:;9.·!Af_/~ r .A''? ~~ ~~...-~ "'·~ . ./r ' •. ·
John p. 7e rtfiour
Mayor
TEP: la
cc: City Council
City Manager
"S"
Director of Public Works
City Engineer
AGENDA ITEM #29(A) -DISTRICT NO. 2
r. o. uox :in:? ,., /\NAHt:tM. t:/\1.1ronN1/\ n;iB0~1
"S"
..
'~
Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFOlmIA
.January 25, 1979
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Fred:
The City of Anaheim currently has two projects in the
planning/design phase which will be constructed on municipally
own~d .land and leased to a non-profit organization.
In accordance with the requested change in· the connection fee
ordinance to permit waivers of fees for projects being constructed
on municipally owned land, the City of Anaheim requests that fees
for the Addition to Anaheim Stadium and the Anaheim Convention
Center be waived. These projects are considered to be of
County wide benefit and importance.
Please call this office if you desire additional information or
if I may be of further assistance.
Very truly yours,
"-:?# ~ e 0 ··-~""~ -'-)~t&~T"~~ ,;. .;;;e~~
Thornton E. Piersall
Director of Public Works
TEP:la
cc: Mayor John Seymour
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
"U" AGENDA ITEM H30(A) -DISTRICT NO. 2 "U"
P. O. H<.lX 3222, Anaheim, C:ulifornia 92803
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 1, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 7:30 p.m., February 14 , 1979 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
* * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
be adjourned to 8:30 a.m., February 22, 1979, at the Orange County Transit
District office. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
8:30 p.m., February 14, 1979.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 1, and 11, of Orange County,
California, ao hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true
and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on
the 14th day of February , 1979 •
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
19 79 •
S-107
day of February
e Boards of Directors
·tation Districts Nos.
, 7, and 11
DISTRICT 5 DIRECTORS:
We have added to the Joint Chairman 's agenda listing
approval of the minutes of the District 5 Adjourned Meeting
on January 23 , 1979. This was inadvertently left off
agenda item #6 when the agenda mater i a l was mailed.
2-14-79
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
WE HAYE BEEN ADVISED BY MIKE DILLON) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF
CASA) THAT IT APPEARS THAT THE DISTRICTS WILL RECEIVE THEIR PRO
RATA SHARE OF THE 1% AD YALOREM TA X THIS YEAR) AND THAT THE PRO-
VISIONS OF SB 154 ADOPTED LAST YEAR TO THE EFFECT THAT SPEC IAL
DISTRICTS WILL NO LONGER RECEIVE AD YALOREM TAX WILL NOT BE
IMPLEMENTED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE THIS YEAR •. DURING THIS
PAST YEAR) THE DISTRICTS RECEIVED $10 MILLION I N AD YALOREM TA XES,
CASA HELD A WORKSHOP IN INDIAN WELLS JANUARY 19 & 20) AND
THE DISTRICTS WERE REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT 6 CHAIRMAN ELVIN
HUTCHISON). FORMER JOINT CHAIRMAN DON WINN) TOM WOODRUFF) AND ~
FRED HARPER, (PERHAPS ASK FOR COMMENTS FROM ANY OF THESE),
.. . ..
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,J
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28TH.
INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE
IN THE DISCUSSIONS:
Ch_OUIS VELASQ~
HARRIETT WIEDER
~
DUANE WINTERS
MEETING DATE February 14, 1979TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
~WELSH) • • • • • • • ·SHARP • • • • • • • V __ _
ORTIZ)···•·· .. ·EVANS······· V'° __ _
RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ·-~ --__
CRANK) .•••• HUTCHISON ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 2
~FRIED) •••••••• WEDAA· • • • • • -~ ----
RASHFORPL •••• HOLT •••••••• 0... ----
ANTHONY) 4 ••••• 8LARIE. • • • • • .-1tL_ ----
COOPER• • • • • ·~ ----. ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM.····-~ __ --
.WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON· • • • • V' ----
EVANS)······· -ORTIZ·······~ ----
CULVER) •• •••• ·PERRY·······~ ----
SEYMOUR)· • • • • • ROTM • • • • • • • ~ ----
HOYTJ • • • • • ····SMITH· • • • • • ·~ __ --ADLER) •••••••• STANTON····-~ ___ _
WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ· • ·~ __ --
DI STR JCT 3
(ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD • • • -~ ___ _
(MEYER) •••••••• GRIFFIN·····~ ___ _
CPERRY) ......... CULVER ••••• -~ ----
(COOPER) •••••• -GAMB I NA· • • • ·~ ___ _
LACAYO)······· HUDSON······~ ----
SE ITZJ • ~ •••••• LASZLO· • ••• -~ ___ _
WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER······~ ___ _
FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON· • • • • • ·~ __ ·--·
EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ.······~ ___ _
NYBORG) ••••••• PR I EST· • • • • ·~ ___ _
YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET •• • • • • ·~ ___ _
SEYMOUR)· • • • • ·ROTH· • • • • • • ·~ ___ _
PATTINSON) .•••• SIEBERT •••• -...&£ ___ _
ZOMMICK) •• · .•• ., .• SYLVIA ••••• ·~--·--
"ANTHON.Y) .. ·., .~IE!ER ••••• ·~ ___ _
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····~ ___ _
DISTRICT 5
~liUMMEU • • • • • • • RY~KOFF • • • • • V' --·--
ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • ·~ ----
RYCKOF F) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • • .,,,,, ----
D JSTR I CT 6
( RYCKOFF) •••••• MC .INN i.s ...• J!!!!:_ _. ___ .
( RI LEY) .•••••••• ANTJ:lON'l· • • • ~ __ -.-
(CRANK) •••••••• H.UTCHI SON··~ ___ _
DISTRICT 7
HOYT • \ •• ~ •••• SMITH ••••••• V" ___ _
WAHNERJ ·······GLOCKNER •••• ......,.-___ _
(ANTHONY).···· @LARI(·······~ __ --(ORTIZ~·.·.· .• •• -EVANS······~ ----~WELSH • ·······SALTARELLI·~~ ___ _
GAIDO • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S· • ·~ ___ _
RYCKOFF) ••••• ·WILLIAMS· •• ·~ ----
DISTRICT 11
MAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON· • ~ ----
PATTJNSQN)· -• ·BA.JLEY· · • • ·~ ----ANTHO~JY) ••• • • L!J'EBER • • • • ·~ ___ _
2/14/79
~RI LEY.)· • ·······ANTHONY· • • • ___.. __ . ~ATTINSQN) ••••• BAILEY ••••• ~ ~c:;~
,,~ITll9HY) •••••• ~ ••••• ·-=-__
COOPER·····~-·
PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER ••••• ~ _. -.
ORTIZ). •••••••• EVANS •••••• ~ __
COOPER) •••••••• GAMBINA •• .; .~ _. _._
WAHNE~) •••••••• GLOCKNER ••• ·.,_...--·-·
ROGET ••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ~ --·
MEYER ••••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ..,,,,,, _. _
RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT •••••• -~ __
WELLS) ••••••••• HOUSTON •••• ~ __
LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON ••••• ~ __
CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON •• ~ __
SEITZ) ••••••••• LASZLO •••• -~ __
RYCKOFF) ••••••• MC INNIS ••• ~ __
WEISHAUPT) ••••• MILLER ••••• ~ --
FINLAYSON) ••••• OLSON •••••• ~ __
EVANS). •••••••• ORTIZ ••••• -~ ~.Q~
MAC AL~ISTER) •• PATTINSON.·~--~~~
CULVER •••••••• PERRY •••••• ~ --
NYBORG •••••••• PRIEST ••••• ~ __
ANTHONY) ••••••• RILEY •••••• ~ _. _
YOUNG) ••••••••• ROGET ••• ··.-~ __
SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH •••••• • ~ -.-
HUMME~) •••••••• RYCKOFF •••• _lL __
WELSH ••••••••• SALTARELLI-~ __
WELSH •.•• ;. ••••• SHARP •• -: ••• --&£, --
PATTI NSONJ •• ••• SIEBERT ••• -~ __
HOYT)·· • • • • • • • ·SMITH. • • • • • ...........-__
ADLER)· • • • .: • • • .·STANTON. • • • ~ __
RYCKOff) ••••••• STRAUSS •••• ~ __
ADLER) ••••••••• SVALSTAD ••• ~ __
ZOMMICK). ····~·SYLVIA.·····~ __
GAIDQ). ·" • • •·• •• VARDOULIS.. ....,..... __
WINTERS).·····. VELASQUEZ.·.~ __
FRIED)········!' WEDAA. • • • • ·~ __ ~Tll9NY). • • • • • • \'lIEBliR· • • • .__::_ __
RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLIAMS •• -~ __
(VELASQUEZ). •••• WINTERS •••• ._..,..... __
:OTHERS
HARPER •••• ·--
SYLVESTER.·--
LEWIS •••••• __
CLARKE •••• ·--
BROWN •••••• __
..
WOODRUFF ••• __
HOHENER •••• __
HOWARD ••••• __
HUNT ••••••• __
KEITH •••••• __
KENNEY ••••• __
LYNCH •••••• __
MADDOX ••••• __
MARTINSON •• __
PI ER SALL •• __
STEVENS •••• __
TRAVERS •••• __
-~
February 14, 1979TIME 7:30 P.M. MEETING DATE
DISTRICT 1
-----DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 .Jw\
~~IELSH) • • • •. • • • ·SHARP ••• b-. • • • II __ _
ORTIZ) •••••• .. ·EVANS• Jr-X-.. ' • • .---r-__ _
-RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY~ •••• _ _f_ __
CRANK) .•••• HUTCHISON _.; __ ==
DISTRICT 2
RASHFORP) ••••• HOLT •••••••• _L_ -__ ~FR I ED) • • • • • ••• WEDAA ••••••• _v ___ _
ANTHONY) ~ ••••• ~ •••••• _ii ____ _
COOPER· ·JJi • ·-7----. ROGET) ••. • ••••• GRAHAM~ • • • ·--___ _
.WELLS).·· •••••• HOUSTON ••••• _./_. ___ _
EVANS)······· ·ORTIZ······ ._L ----CUL VER) ••••••• PERRY ••••••• _v ____ _
SEYMOUR)· • • • • • ROTH • • • • • • • ~ ___ _
HOYT J • • ·······SMITH······· ./. ___ _
ADLERJ •••••••• STANTON ••••• --r-
WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ ••• ./ == ==
DISTRICT 3
~ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD •••• __:!__ ___ _
~MEYER) •••••••• GRIFFIN·····__L ___ _
PERRY) •••••••• CULVER······ ../
COOPER) ••••••• GAMBINA· • • • .-J-----
LACAYO)······ ·HUDSON······ ~ == == SEITZ) • ~ •••••• LASZLO· •;;;t, •• _.1 ____ _
WEISHAUPT} •••• MILLER ••••• v'
FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON.·····.-./-. ----.
EVANS} •••••••• ORTIZ.·····.-,---·--·
NYBORG) ••••••• PRIEST •••••• -.;-----
YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET ••••••• -.,;-· ----
SEYMOUR)· • • • • ·ROTH· • • • • • • .-"-. ----
PATTINSON)._ ••• SIEBERT.... .J == ==
.ZOMMICK) •• · .• • ..... SYLVIA •••••• .; --·--
ANTHON.Y) •. • .. , ~ • -WI ~;gER •••••• -:-r
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS..... ,/ == == _
DISTRICT 5
~liUMMElJ ••••••• RYCKOFF.; ••• ·-" ---· __
ANTHONY) •· • • • • ·RI LEY • • • • • • ._../_ ----
RYC KOFF)· • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ._./_ ----
DISTRICT 6
( RYCKOFF) •••••• MC .INN is .... ~ ____ .
( R I_LEY) .~ ••••••• AN.TJ:IONY .. • • • • ·~ ___ _
(CRANK) •••••••• H.UTCH I SON· • ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 7
HOYT • \ ••••••• SMlTH ••••••• ~ ___ _
WAHNERJ ·······GLOCKNER •••• _,,, ____ _
{ ANTHOrY) • • • • • • Ct:A-Rtt=-· • • • • ._.,,_. ----
( ORTl Z •••• .• ··-EVANS······.__:!__ ___ _
~WELSH • ·······SALTARELLI·~~ ___ _
GAIDO • • • • • • • ·VARDOULIS· • • v' RYCKOFF>······WILLIAMS····~ == ==
DISTRICT 11
MAC ALLISTER)·PATTINSON·. ~ __ --
PATTINSON)··· ·BAILEY··· •• ·-,/-__ --ANTHO~Y J •••••• W~ •••• ·~ ___ _
·2/14i79
JOINT BOARDS
~RI LEY.) • • • • • • • • ·ANTHONY· • • • _v_ ----. r-.
PATTINSQN) ••••• BAILEY ••••• ......:::::::--~~,
ANTHONY). • • • • • CLARK •••••• ___ . _
COOPER····· · · -~PERRY) ••••••••• CULVER ••••• == ----
ORTIZ) ••••••••• EVANS •••••• __ --·_
COOPER •••••••• GAMB I NA •••• _ .. _. . .. WAHNE~L ••••••• GLOCKNER ••• _. _. _ ----
ROGET ••••••••• GRAHAM ••••• _ .. -·---·-
MEYER ••••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ____ ._
RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT. •••••• __ . -··-
WELLS) ••••••••• HOUSTON •••• __
LACAYO) •••••••• HUDSON..... --
CRANK) ••••••••• HUTCHISON •• == ----
SEITZ). •••••••• LASZLO ••••• ___ _
RYCKOFFL •••••• MC INNIS ••• ____ ·
WEISHAUPT) ••••• MILLER ••••• ___ _
FINLAYSON). •••• OLSON •••••• ___ _
EVANS) ••••••••• ORTIZ •••••• ____ ·' ),_..
MAC AL~I STER) •• PATTINSON •• __ ____:::---1U1---1Ytc.A,·
CUL VER •••••••• PERRY •••••• _./ __ _
NYBORG •••••••• PR I EST ••••• _.; __ _
ANTHONY) ••••••• RI LEY •••••• _v __ _
YOUNG) ••••••••• ROGET •••.••• _./ __ _
SEYMOUR) ••••••• ROTH ••••••• _v_. __
HUMME~) •••••••• RYCKOFF •• -•• ~ __
WELSH •••.•••••• SALTARELLI ·--t--__
WELSH •.•• \ ••••• SHARP.~~ ••• _v __ _
PATTINSONJ· ··.·.SIEBERT •••• _../_·--
HOYT)····.".···. SMITH •••••• _i1 __ _
ADLER)····~··· .·STANTON.··· •• _.1 __ _
RYCKOf F) • • • • • • • STRAUSS •• ·•• ..;
ADLER)· • • • • • • • • SVALSTAD. • .. v ==
ZOMMICK). ····~·SYLVIA...... .I
GAIDO)· ·" • • •·•·•• VARDOULIS •• -./---
WINTERS).······ VELASQUEZ.·. -v---
FRI ED)·.·.·····. it WEDAA •••••• -v----
ANTHONY).······ WIEDER·· ••• -:;;---
RYCKOFF) ••••••• WLLLIAMS ••• -v---
VELASQUEZL •••• WINTERS.... ..; ==
:OTHERS
HARPER ••••• _v_
fl ~ SYLVESTER •• ~
x,.tt._ , LEW IS •••••• ~ ·-v ~ji ~ ~:f,h<c,I CLARKE •••• ·-""-
. u l BROWN •••••• _v_
~l c;l,.,4,_ 'iLfl.r>JO
,,.,_,Hf} ~ WOODRUFF ••• ~
l{UV'a,L.j/ \ HOHENER •••• __
IA: -;t-fi'iJJ ~le) HOWARD •••• ·-
1/" ~ HUNT ••••••• __
KEITH •••••• ~
KENNEY..... .
LYNCH •••••• -Y
'jlj:':DD@K. ~ •• ·--1-
MARTI NSON •• _v_
PI ER SALL. •• __
STEVENS •••• __
TRAVERS •••• · __
FEBRUARY 14, 1979 JOINT MTG .
a) Report of the Joint Chairman
Saltarelli reported that we have been advised by Mike Dillon ,
Executive Director of CASA, that it appea rs that the Districts will
receive t he ir pro rata share of the 1 % ad va lorem t ax this year, and
that the provisions of SB 154 adopted last year to the effect that
special districts will n o longer receive ad valorem tax wil l not be
implemented by the State L egi slature this year . During this past
year, the Districts received $1.1 or 12 million.
Adv is ed that CASA held a workshop in Indian Wells January 19 & 20
and the Districts were repr esente d by Directors E l v in Hutchi son and
Don Smith, former Joint Chairman Don Winn, Tom Woodruff and Mr. Harper .
Don Smith briefly reported o n conference; said it was a good confe r ence .
Then Saltarelli called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday , February 28th and i nvited Directors Louis Ve l asquez and
Ray Williams to attend.
(7-b) Report of the Gen e ral Manager
Mr. Harper advised that in a n effort to get add i tional space, thought
we wou l d try ou t some narrow tables in the front row . Asked Directors
for commen t on t ab les and received it. HA. Will get back bigger tables.
Reported that EPA still inte n ds to get ocean waiver regulations out
by mid -March . Said at a r ece nt meeting in Washington they were convinced
they are going to give us some regu lat ions that should make some s ense .
Are gearing up to fight some environmental group s and may take them
to court. They say they will give adequate time for agencie s to do
monitoring required.
Referred to con s ent calendar i tem (9-b) re award of Job No . J-3-1 ,
Installation of Gas Engines with Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall
Booster Station, to Pascal & Ludwig. Pascal & Ludwig are asking that
they be excu3ed from accepting award. We are asking that this item
be removed from consent calendar and recommending that the letter
from Pascal & Ludwig be ref erred to the General Counse l for further
study and r ecommendatio n and will report back next month. *See page 2 also.
Re item (9 -e) would like that item removed from agenda . Were accepting
Digester Gas P i ping System at Ocean Ou tfall Pumping Station, Job
No . J-6-lF, as complete, but c ontractor has now asked for a change
order and we have to look into it .
Re item (9 -i) advised of correction of dollar figure for value engineering
services of Peter Barotti from $9 ,9 50 to $7 ,000 .
Vardoulis ·made a suggest ion that in the event we can 't receive our
part of the 1 % tax , we should seek legislation to hav e water purveyors
do the billing for sewer service. Currently , there is legis l ation
whereby water purveyor may bi ll for sewers . Said he would ask Directors
tonight to support directing the attorney to try to get legislation
introduced that would require t hem to do so. In order to do it now,
we would have to try to convince some 60 water purveyors and doubt
£f we could accomplish that. Wouldn't be on property tax so wouldn't
have to have a public hearing.
Laszlo asked how much we were talking about putting on water bill.
Was answered $35-45.
Wedaa reiterated that the proposed action was to ask attorney to
provide us a list of pros and cons on this suggestion. He then so
moved that the attorney be directed to provide Board with some pros
and cons relative to seeking this type of legislation to collect
charges on water bills. Motion seconded. Voice vote. Motion carried.
*Re item (9-b) again, Saltarelliadvisedthat the letter of Pascal & Ludwig
re Job No. J-3-1, needed to be received and filed. It was so moved,
seconded and carried by voice vote.
(11) Re: Sewage Sludge Management Facility
TLW advised that as of today we have both good news and bad news. Said
we do have a final agreement with the County re landf ill operation.
Will be presented to Board of Supervisors on the 27th. Is in accordance
with agreement worked out by staff with no major changes except Districts'
staff requested that we be reimbursed on the same charge basis as
County was paying its landfi ll contractor for any cover that we put
on the site that they would n ot have to do. Our feeling was t hat i f
we do work and place cover (requested to put 6 feet), will save County
from paying their contractor. Feel we should be paid for doing it.
That needs to be resolved.
The bad n ews is this is not going to be heard by the State Solid Waste
Management Board this month. They have determined they will not have
possession of our negative declaration for sufficient legal time for
which to grant their approval prior to State Board h earing on the 23rd,
so will go over to the 15th of March . No signi ficant difficu l ties . Said
is clear in my mind they wi ll approve processing but is just a matter
of approving a nd the timing und er CEQA.
(a) (b) (c) & (d) moved , seconded and carried.
(15) Status report of Seecial Reorganization Committee
Smith mentioned names of Committee members.
by Don Smith)
(See attached report read
TLW added that conceptual program of consolidation of 7 Districts is
to save money in each successive year. Problems are in trying to get
an acceptab l e reorganization. Some Districts more flush than others;
some Di str icts have outstanding bonded indebtedne ss; some Districts
ab l e to construct master planned sewers and others not financially able
to. Basica lly , if we go forward, wi ll process conso lidation under
District Reorganization Act . Time consumi ng but not particularly
difficult. Most difficult part is how to carry over and provide for
retirement and outstanding bonded indebtedness. Are some options to
choose.
-2-
TLW then referred to page 3 of report handed out to Directors . Said
Exhibit "A" is a big map showing all of the master planned sewers in
the Districts . Everything on green sheet is, as of today, fully funded.
Schedule B-2 , blue sheet , i s everything that can be guaranteed to be
constructed within 5 years . Everything on pink sheet is not guaranteed .
These are not master planned sewer lines and their construction time
is somewhat uncertain . Advised agreement has been prepared accordingly
to address itself to those schedules . When this agreement is approved ,
wil l include approving those three schedules and that is basically
the order everything will be built. Need 2/3 of all Directors and the
vo t e of Director of city in which line is to be built in order to have
veto effect on order.
Re Section 6, we wi l l effectively account for monies for a given
District . Money will be earmarked for a particul ar District and will
stay there. Re Section 7 , by the end of 5 years will be enough money
on hand to guarantee construct ion schedu l e of l i nes . Re Schedule I II,
will not occur for at least f i ve years. Construction is based on
flexibility and everything can be changed by simple majority vote of
Directors present. Re Section 9, if trunk line is able to obtain a
grant whereby it is 75% funded , then that can go to accelerated position.
Re Section 1 0, if, as a condition of annexation , District needs a line
and property owner says he wi l l build it , then that can go to front of
line . If District approves a reimbursement agreement , won't get money
until everything on blue sheet is paid for . Can't move ahead to top
of list. Sections 11 & 12 are housekeeping sections re bond redemption
monies . Wo n 't pay off a l l the bonds automatical l y . Section 13, important .
Must follow priorities of monies which you have on deposit. Each
existing District has financial obligations to (1) pay for two secondary
treatment facilities; (2) pay off the bonded indebtedness within pre -
existing District; and (3) build master planned trunk sewers . Any
remaining funds wil l be refunded back to the property owners in the
area in which it was accrued . Uncertain about this. Have done quite
a bit of reaearch and haven 't come to any conclusions yet . If that is
the desire of Directors, may entail future legislation and validating
act. If not included , the monies would go into general funding and
used for general funding purposes. Agreement would also provide for
a uniform ordinance on connection and annexation charges. That has not
been done but is forthcoming. Said Committee is looking for input from
each respective District .
Mcinnis said he had a burning question --is someone going to tell us
how we are are going to save money? Said JWS would give brief report .
JWS advised he would not go through report in detail . About 8 o·%
already covered by TLW. Stated that yellow summary represented
consolidated budget based upon our current funding levels for 5 -6 year
cash flow projections . Have separate l isting for each District and
a combined column. Is our intent to refer information to each
respective District. Line 1 i s total cost of treatment plant expansion .
Line 2 is those projects that are grant elligible , and Line 3 costs
are to be funded by Orange County taxpayers. Line 4, outstanding bonds .
Lines 5, 10 & 12 , construction schedules . By taking line 3 and adding
outstanding bond principal and B-1 facilities , those are all fully
funded total on line 7 . Mentioned for District 11 we have indicated
a grant for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer. Total funding requirements on
line 7 are what we need to pay for treatment plant expansion for
-3 -
next six years and set aside funds to pay outstanding General
Obligation bonds and build master planned B-1 facilities.
At that point still have a surplus amount in each of the seven
Districts. Reported further that line 10 represents B-2 schedule
of master plan facilities. Some of those trunk sewers are partially
funded and others are not funded at all. Line 12 indicates B-3
facilities and that puts certain Districts in a deficit position.
Line 14 indicates bond interest. By obligating current funds to pay
off the principal and holding that money in short term investments,
believe we can make sufficient interest on those funds to pay as it
falls due.
Wedaa asked if Committee is asking for each District to have a meeting
within 45 days & provide some input to Committee and meet again. Was
answered yes. He so moved and motion seconded.
Question was asked why we are considering consolidation. Saltarelli
answered that the reason why goes back many years. Grand Jury has
requested that we consider this again. Will reduce number of Directors
and fees paid to Board. Also eliminate duplication of keeping separate
sets of books. JWS added that the original report given to Board
several months ago indicated savings of $50,000 per year made up
primarily of savings of Directors' fees and accounting costs. Smith
stated that some of those figures will be followed through as we get
further. Saltarelli said that if all Districts say they are interested
in consolidation, will do a thorough analysis of cost savings to taxpayers
and re clerical costs, etc. Then will bring matter back to Joint Board.
If two or three Districts don't want to do it, no use going any further.
Directors said they didn't think they were getting information they
needed to make a decision. Saltarelli advised that this information
was in the first report mailed out. Said will send report out again
to Directors.
Director said he would like cost of consolidation procedure also.
Saltarelli added we think that the reasons are substantial. Cost
savings may not be as dramatic as change would be. Is a public outcry
for this. Said if you can do it in your District and feel your District's
interests will be protected adequately and still have representation,
then should do it, but if you can't be satisfied, then your District
may not want to do it. Every District would have to approve it. Don't
think it is feasible unless every District decides to do it. Are
trying to make it equitable foi all Districts.
Svalstad recommended for District 3 that the staff submit this material
and information at the same time as the notification of the time and
pla c P .nf the meeting for discussion.
Saltare lli stated that it is very important for each District to meet
with staff and attorney.
Sharp a J ked if they will have data on operating costs before we have
those meetings and was answered, definitely.
Saltarelli advised that the re were no time constraints. Smith added
that the Committee was shooting for July 1, 1980. Suggested that one
Committee member or alternate attend each District meeting.
-4-
Olson asked if there would be any advantage if two Districts would
combine their meetings. Said it could be done. Don't see any
advantage.
Saltarelli said staff will prepare more information and get it out
to Directors. Directors said they would like Grand Jury report also.
Will send this also.
Question was asked when individual Districts get together, what is the
vote required -was answered a majority of the Directors of the District.
Voice vote on getting additional information. Motion carried.
Saltarelli said we will coordinate with Chairmen of the Districts
to set up meetings. Smith added that if two Districts want to joint
together in a meeting, will be fine also.
-5-
(29) DISTRICT 2 -Breal request for waiver of connection fees
Perry stated that he had direction from
to vote on this item and possib l y other
also , so would not need to discuss i t .
from his council a l so. Other Directors
discuss this.
his council and knew what way
Directors were ready to vote
Velasquez said he had direction
indicated they wanted to
TLW commented that during the meeting last month there was some
discu s sion regarding whether he should embark on researching alternative
methods of providing for waiver of fees. Referred to his memo with
the agenda material which just contains some of the thoughts of the
Directors and staff . Said the r e is not a recommendation on any of
the a l ternatives. They are just a shopping list of ways that could
be accomplished in terms of providing for waiver of connection fees.
Reviewed list of alternatives , a ll of which would require a new ordinance
to be adopted by the District .
Perry moved denia l of the request of Breal. Velasquez seconded the
motion , with some confusion, he sa i d, because issue is not that clear.
His council took a decisive step to oppose Breal request . Sorry to
say that to Brea.
Point of information asked for, asked when they voted on (a), was that
only to receive and file? Was answered yes .
Velasquez added, would like to have the b r oad issue of waiver of fees
discussed by his council . Didn 't discuss whether government-owned
land should be waived; only discussed Breal.
Cooper addressed Velasquez and said , if I understand you correctly,
you are saying it is not clear in your mind that we were just discussing
a particular area? Velasques answered, no , the mer i ts of the various
alternatives proposed by Counse l is not clear in my mind. Would like
to go back to my council to discuss these alternatives. This particular
project was discussed but not future possibilities.
Graham said she felt that waiver should be denied for this particular
project but would not oppose changing an ordinance to permit this to
be waived in the future for Alternate No . 1 . Thought i f ordinance
is changed , should be for a l l Districts and not just one District, for
all municipally-owned land.
Houston asked Graham if she was against giving Breal a waiver and she
answered, yes. Houston added that his concern is that by taking
action on Breal, does this necessarily mean that we have established
a precedent, particularly for the City of Anaheim? TLW answered that
if the majority vote of the Board is to effectively grant the waiver
to Breal, would have to adopt an ordinance and probably would be
setting a precedent. Ordinance could be written to specify certain
conditions. Houston then asked if Anaheim's request falls into the
category of Alternate No . 1. TLW answered , yes , they own both of
those facilities and the land on which they sit.
Stanton said he had heard two comments against this motion because
are against Breal. Sa i d he was voting against motion beca u se he is
against the general principle in any of the alternative forms. Will
-6 -
run into various interpretation problems. The most responsible and
rational move calls for Directors to not a l low exceptions in any form.
I f voting on Brea l, wou l d probably say yes . Would be opening up
Pandora 's box.
Cooper then stated that he would like to have the Chair read the
< letter that Brea has presented today. Chair stated that letter would
be included in the record.
Roth stated that his council ins tructed him to vote in favor of Breal 's
request. Said City of Anaheim just finished building a reti rement
home . Feel that expansion of convention center and ballpark are
certainly 100% publicly-owned and in our opinion, in the same category
as Breal.
Cooper said when he made his appeal, said that he would support any
project that was similar to Breal's type of project . I f Anaheim or
any other city within entire District would support any type of non-
profit senior-citi zen type p roject, he would support it. No matter
what the fees were .
Anthony asked FAH if we have had any similar requests in the past .
FAH answered, have had 2 or 3 of this type of request for waiver .
Asked FAH's opinion. He answered it gets down to a political policy
type question in his mind. District 2 wou l dn't miss that amount of
money . It does shift the cost to other people in the District.
With regard to five alternatives, if one opens the door a little bit,
is some question in the staff's mind whether or not you can do it
under the Federal regulations . Is some concern as far as the revene
program. May find six months down the road that we may have to ask
the Board to change the ordinance.
Cooper then stated that in difference to whatever the vote will be ,
woul d like to wi thdraw the request and will request a deferment
of payment of fees for a period of time, 1 0 years, 6 years, whateve r .
Was advised that this woul d still require an ordinance change .
Someone stated that this is out of order. Request for deferral should
be a separate request and processed separately. Asked is request
withdrawn at this time? Should probably table this f irst.
JWS mentioned that at the last meeting the Board had deferred payment
of fees pending a final determination on the waiver request by Board .
Anthony suggested how about a motion to accept the withdrawa l request
by the City of Brea. Would be a substitute motion . It was so mov e d
to accept withdrawal of request for waiver of fees from City of
Brea on behalf of Breal , Inc. Motion seconded . Voice vote . Mo t ion
carried . (Didn 't get names of Directors voting no)
Cooper then requested that a deferral of payment of fees for 10 years
be granted.
Perry sRid he would have to take that back to his council to discuss .
TLW advised that would require an ordinance a mendment also.
-7 -
Velasquez said that was discussed in his council and they felt a
deferral was synonymous with waiver .
Stanton then moved that they table further consideration of any of
the five alternatives for waiver and/or deferment of fees. Motion
seconded.
Question asked if that included the Anaheim issue. Said in effect,
includes any further projects that come before us .
Velasquez asked for a point of information . Asked the Chairman if
there is any indication as to when this may be brought back up?
Said in the absence of new specific recommendations or requests,
fees will be due and payable immediately. Would have to be brought
back on an agenda in order to go back to councils for discussions .
Voice vote on motion to table. Motion carried.
motion .)
(This removed Perry 's
JWS stated that the staff needs direction re last month's minutes
re suspension of fees . Stanton said to delegate this to General
Manager to allow some reasonable time within provision of existing
ordinance.
Culver then suggested that this matter re waiver of all fees from
all Districts on a uniform basis be referred to the Executive Committee .
Graham said they should have some financial data along with that .
Vardoulis commented that it seemed to him that this project and any
other project of this type when dealing with low-cost housing projects
would qualify easily for HCDA funding . Why not? Cooper stated that
this particular organization would like to keep every other governmental
agency out so it wouldn 't get tied down.
Stanton questioned Culver's suggestion to refer this to the Executive
Committee. Said it was his interpretation of his motion that it
tabled the waiving of fees . Saltarelli advised that it was only
in District 2 that it was tabled.
(30) DISTRICT 2 -Request of City of Anaheim for waiver of fees
Question was asked if this still was an action item? TLW said we
have a specific request before us and think something should be done
with it.
Moved to table Anaheim like Breal. (no second and motion dropped)
Graham moved to deny request of City of Anaheim. Motion seconded.
Voice vote. Motion carried. Roth voted no.
-8-
. "'
~-'~ ~79
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
FROM: DON SMITHJ CHAIRMAN OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
CONSOLIDATION
THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO STUDY REORGANIZATION OF THE SANITA-
TAION DISTRICTS FIRST MET ON OCTOBER 25TH TO DEVELOP A PLAN OF
STUDY. WITH THE PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 13 LAST JUNE) THE TAX RATE
ISSUE) J,E,J A DIFFERENT TAX RATE FOR EACH DISTRICT) IS NO LONGER
OF CONCERN, ON JANUARY 24THJ THE COMMITTEE DEVELOPED A DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION OF THE 7 SANITATION DISTRICTS INTO
1 DISTRICT.
THIS EVENING) WE WOULD LIKE TO GIVE YOU A SHORT BRIEFING ON
THE MAJOR POINTS CONTAINED IN THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT
FOLLOWED BY A REVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF CONSOLIDATION,
WHILE NO ACTION IS EXPECTED TONIGHT) THE COMMITTEE DESIRES A
RESPONSE IN THE NEAR FUTURE FROM THE BOARDS TO DETERMINE IF CON -
SOLIDATION IS DESIRABLE BEFORE PROCEEDING FURTHER,
FOLLOWING TONIGHT'S BRIEFING) WE BELIEVE THAT EACH BOARD SHOULD
MEET WITHIN THE NEXT 45 DAYS TO CONSIDER THE PROS AND CONS OF CON-
SOLIDATION. EACH BOARD SHOULD DETERMINE IF THEY WISH TO HAVE THE
COMMITTEE PROCEED WITH DEVELOPING A FINAL CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT,
IF CONSOLIDATION IS TO BECOME A REALITY) IT IS THE COMMITTEE'S
SUGGESTION THAT THE TARGET DATE BE JULY lJ 1980,
OUR GENERAL COUNSEL) MR, WOODRUFF) WILL REVIEW THE 3RD DRAFT
AGREEMENT AND THIS WILL BE FOLLOWED BY A BRIEF PRESENTATION BY OUR
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE) WAYNE SYLVES TER) OF THE SUMMARY OF FUNDS
AVAILABLE AND THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED,