The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-07-12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS � TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 S40-291 0 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA "� 9 6 2-2 41 1 P. O. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 5, 1978 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 VIEDNESDAY, jULY 12, 1978 -- 7:3O R,Vi, 1084�; ELL I s AVE14UE FOUNTA 1 f4 VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 21 3, 51 61 7 and ll of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Sec tart' Schedul.cd upcoming meetings: ADJOURNED JOINT MEETING - Wednesday,- July 19 , 1978 , at 6: 00 p.m. EXECUTIVE COI-WITTEL & FISCAL POLICY CO14MITTEE - Tyr?ednesday, July 26, 1978 , at 5:30 p.m. and/or Wednesday, August 2, 1978, at 5: 30 p.m. L. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELUS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 '%4wagi. (714)540.2910 (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITI'EE MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Month Meeting Date Committee Meeting Date July July 12, 1978 July 26, 1978 August Aug 9, 1978 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 1978 Sep 27, 1978 October Oct. 11, 1978 Oct 25, 1978 November Nov 8, 1978 Nov 22, 1978 December Dec 13, 1978 None Scheduled January Jan 10, 1979 Jan 24, 1979 February Feb 14, 1979 Feb 28, 1979 March Mar 14, 1979 Mar 283 1979 April Apr 11.1 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May May 9, 1.979 May 23, 1979 June June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 Jul; July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Count f SLit!,tion Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270S Telephones: w Area Code 714 540-2910 l BOARDS J �" 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE ADJOURNlEWTS POSMO J U LY 12, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. COMP fi)iLEi.GE...�✓... FILES SET UP ...................... ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON RESOLUTION'S CERTIFIED ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR LETTERS APPROPRIATE DEPARTMEN HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF MINUi'ES WRSTTEnI.�.,.,. WILL BE AVAILABLE AT :00 P.M$ IMMEDIATELY MINUTES FILED,,,,, PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (21 Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Cons' e 'on of n, o rec d '--le minute excerpts, if any (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, n1`s as mailed: District 1 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 2 - June 14, 1978, regular, June 21, 1978, adjourned and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 3 - June 14, *1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 5 - June 142 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 6 June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District- 7 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 11 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned (7) -Annual election of _Joint Chairman. -- Nominee: Director Don Saltarelli �S (8) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman - Nominee: Director Don Fox (9) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel ./ (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ROLL CALL VDTF, the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND - See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND - See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 - NONE DISTRICTS 5 €, 6 SUSPENSE - See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 7 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 - See page(s) "B" and "D" (11) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 11(A) THROUGH 11(R) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the en_t calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state CHgIRMgM SALT ^,Jdze� and designate by letter the item to be gRELLI:PL EAS "�Rzle4dar. Rt4OV UNDEREITEM 11121TEM (1) TO BE CONSIDERED + + + + + + + + + y items are to be deleted from the consr,,,. Roll Call Vote or Cast Consideration of action to a prove all agenda items a earin Unanimous Ballot P• g PP g lion the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- r f'• j (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) GD .-.-------- ALL DISTRICTS LETTER .............. a✓c ....TKLR ... (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of SO a Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-031, to Hooker Chemical Corporation, for the price of .0817 per pound. See page "Ett fig ...�._..._... (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in LETTER the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the ZA/c ::..TKLR 1978-79 fiscal year, and approving payment of annual dues of o. $1,100 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted Fits """7 by Rosswood Industries, Inc. in the amount of $19,375.00 against �------- Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control A/c —MR —-..- Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-124, authorizing payment of interest earned on invested commingled funds to the fund in LEtrE ._. which the interest is accrued. See page "Ft' A/C TKLR »» nsideration of motion authorizing payment to Bird Machine Company i t of $7,000.00 for rental of planetary gear � unit for use during the re u a gear box unit at Reclamation Plant No. 1 sludge7tew=ter�in a `..•� (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of November 9, 1977, Flu ................ authorizing completion of Installation of Additional Pumping LETTER ....-...•_ Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1D, by A/c MR - Districts' force account, and approving increase in the maximum amount for said work from $57,706.00 to $109,200.00. See page "Gtt (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of two surplus LETTER ....... District cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner A/c ..-TKLR (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-125, authorizing execution of Lease/Purchase Agreement with Envirotech Corp. re evaluation of Fhn- i----�. solids dewatering filter press for Interim Solids Handling ...w Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, in form approved by the ER General Counsel, for a maximum amount of $10,000. (Up to 871310 of /S.V c ...TKLR ._ cost to be reimbursed to Districts pursuant to existing agreement with LA/OMA) See page "H" D. (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of Used Grader, Specification No. A-093, for LETTER .----- an amount not to exceed plus tax and freight; and purchase A/c ...MR ._ of Used Loader, Specification No. A-094, for an amount not to ._. exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight, to be used for sludge composting operation (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to LEVER .............. negotiate and award purchase of 12 Cylinder Head Replacement Units A/C TKLR .... for dual fuel gas engines at Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-094, for an amount not to exceed $20,000 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure necessary 7 FILE' ._ contracting services up to $4,500 for pavement repairs, house lateral extensions, adjustment of sewer manhole frames and covers and LETTER "".. related work from qualified firms immediately available to A/C _.TKLR .... perform said work, without competitive bidding, as required by ------------- Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 ......... FILE ........• - (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a LETTER --____-. change order to Purchase Order No. 34220 to Haul-Away Containers, to A/c _TKLR -- , increase maximum amount from $4,500 to $6,000 for added disposal �_t,R b services required due to storm damages during 1978-79 DISTRICT 2 FILE _---- (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from R. E. and Terry Hurst for annexation of .607 acres of territory A/C .TKLR .. to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 - Hurst Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" ( ) n Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-127-2, authorizing FILE _...-..... ErrE initiation of proceedings to annex 165.676 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - - Tar Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 FILE ''""""� (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-128-2, accepting Grant of EnER Easement from Santa Fe Land Improvement Company for right-of-way A/C •.TKLR .... in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, QQ 2- 1L' Contract No. 2-20, at no cost to the District. See page '.J" __.. DISTRICT 5 FILE -....._......... - (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file. and sugport .the request of LETTER _.....__... Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency, dated June 15, A/C _.TKLR .... 1978, for all member agencies to vigorously enforce their current ---- provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision developments --- - that are tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. See page "K" DISTRICT 7 FILE _ (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-129-7, authorizing LETTE initiation of proceedings to annex 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall v A/C ....TKLR Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 - Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District -- ----- No. 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) FILE , (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-130-7, ordering annexation of 11.027 acres of territory to the District in A/c ....Tt.LR .... the vicinity of the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 76 - Tract No. 9874 to County Sanitation District No. 7 END -OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any I -S- T (13) ALL DISTRICTS Flu -~•••-•••-- Consideration of motion authorizing appointment of Director . J to serve as the Districts' representative on the Southern California /c ....TKLR ~.. Association of Governments 208 Program Committee, to replace retired ..... Director Frances Wood (14 ALL DISTRICTS Presentation by LA/OMA representative re sludge disposal alternatives FILE ._~~-....... (15) ALL DISTRICTS A/c ..TKLR ... Staff report re dedication ceremonies for 50 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (16) ALL DISTRICTS FILE Status report re continued levy of ad valorem special assessment vs. flat UTITR _____ rate special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be A/C MR — collected on the tax roll for funding 1978-79 budgetary requirements (17) ALL DISTRICTS .__ Consideration of actions in connection with preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, pursuant to 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: ,�Va) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated June 29, 1978. See page "L" FILE .................. (b) Consideration of motion amending March 8, 1978, Board action to authorize the General Manager to engage the services of consulting ��TTER ~"�•"'�"' firms for the purpose of gathering required information for'c ~..TKLR ...Y M 1 application for waiver of secondary. treatment requirements, and increasing the total maximum authorization from $50,000 to an amount -----�—�--. not to exceed $125,000 (c) Consideration of motion amending April 12, 1978, Board actions re engagement of consulting services (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b ') : .. FILE ..._----------: FILE (1) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, UTIA/c TKLR .... engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for on a per diem basis waiver of secondary treatment requirements, p , •~•~•--~-•-•••••~•• and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $15,000 to $20,000 FILE LETTER ~.....-•-u (2) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 19782 A/c ...TKLR .... engaging John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with SAVI �`fl Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment require- ments, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the �~.. .N..,., maximum fee from $7,500 to $45,000 (d) Consideration of actions authorizing engagement of consulting services // for the following (NOTE: The following services are included in the ILE ..v.....- 125 000 maximum set forth above under "b" LETTER ........_. A C ._TKLR _. (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal `..� of J. B. Gilbert & Associates for services on a per diem fee 1� basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000 (Item #17 continued on page 7) -6- (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) • -- 6p'�o (d) (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal -.-,...... I�r ll of K. P. Lindstrom E Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $8,000 '�• •V (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract for services with outside laboratories for toxic analysis work, for a total amount not to exceed $25,00D (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract with various firms for mapping and drifting services, LETTER "'-"""'" for a total amount not to exceed $9,500 A/C ••..TKLR .... (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: 18) (a-1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the FILE .............-... 1 plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment LETTER -.-.---- ITEMS ON Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, providing for a change in the A/C •-.TKLR _SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA final completion date from 45 days to 90 days, and providing that the work shall commence within 30 days from the date of - the contract oe or Cas t (a-2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-126, to receive and file Unanimous Ballot M1� bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for ILE _ ITEMS ON Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job.No. PW-062, fSUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA to Sully Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of L �- _ $100,180.00 See pages '.I" and "II" (,�•�_ y M' S (a-3) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment _ ITEMS ON Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, authorizing a deduction of $21,960.00 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA from the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company due to FILE -. ...... -•• a deletion of bid items 7 and 8 re sidewalk and ramp at the sludge <jETTER -��•• �✓ hopper. See page "III" 19 DI TRICT 1 A/C 114R 0 herb ess and ZovAoications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 8�c�pp (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any PILE --..--•------ mlS(21) (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and LETTER .---=-- specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster ITEMS ON Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, clarifying A/C ....TIMR — SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA insurance requirements and revising page 5 of the Proposal re Bid _ Item No. 8 (22) DISTRICT 3 0 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (25) DISTRICT 6 0 her bu ess and -tom�uni cations or supplemental agenda items, if any FdE ✓ (26) DISTRICT 6 R?.� nFey.✓ Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 f� A/C _TKLR -o- 0 (27) DISTRICT 7 ,,/I Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -{.elWete or cast /I II�27) (a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-131-7, ordering Unanimous Ballot •'� annexation of 1.555 acres of territory to the District in the ITEMS ON vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda Drive in the Lemon SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 61 - La Vereda Drive Annexation to County Sanitation District No: 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) \/ (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 1 r :41 (29) ISTRICT 11 - OOther business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 rdZ Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (�• • (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2: �1 fiLE .--` (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John Wertin Development Corporation, dated June 30, 1978, requesting annexation A/C � ✓.,/ on behalf of the property owners of approximately 3,331 acres of territory located north of the Santa Ana River and easterly of the "• �� tte�rm.inus .of Esperanza Road? S p e "M" � �.'3 S-$�►�e�-�r � .-fie Sao.� NOTE: The proponents request that fees be paid on 1,508 acres of territory proposed for urban use based upon the annexation acreage fee in effect on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal annual installments commencing one year following annexation, with interest at 6% per annum; and deferral of acreage fees on the balance of 1,823 acres of open space until service is required for said acreage, at which time annexation acreage fees would be due and payable at the fee in effect at the time service is provided. C(b)) Presentation by proponents ME Report of General Counsel LETTER .............. G A/c -.TKLR.••-• (d) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare a report re proposed annexation for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting on- a+r-f- $- (32) DISTRICT 2 Othe busine and common ions or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978 q '. _8- g BOARDS OF DIIZECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange._ County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 ARDS 540-2910 JOINT BO 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE JULY 12, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMEN HEAD' IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE -AVAILABLE LABLE AT 3:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING ' WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any —se—se Supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 2 - June 14, 1978, regular, June 21, 1978, adjourned and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 3 - June� 14,.*1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District S - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978s adjourned District 6 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 7 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 11 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned (7) Annual election of Joint Chairman - Nominee: Director Don Saltarelli (8) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman - Nominee: Director Don Fox (9) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of BOLL CALL VOTE— the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND - See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND - See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 - NONE DISTRICTS 5 F, 6 SUSPENSE - See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 7 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 - See page(s) "B" and "D" (11) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 11(A) THROUGH 11(R) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the CHAIRMAN ggL7gRE u on recognition by the chair, state LLI : gnate by letter the item to be endar. PLEASE REMOVE ITEM UNDER ITEM #12 (�) TO BE CONSIDERED t :� • t * e * IT * s Chairman will determilio �. any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Roll Call Vole or cast Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing Unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- r (I1) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS �..1 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-031, to Hooker Chemical Corporation, for the price of .0817 per po d. See page "Eff (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1978-79 fiscal year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,100 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Rosswood Industries, Inc. in the amount of $19,375.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-124, authorizing payment of interest earned on invested commingled funds to the fund in which the interest is accrued. See page "F" nsideration of motion authorizing payment to Bird Machine Company i t of $7,000.00 for rental of planetary gear unit for use during the rep 'fu a gear box unit at Reclamation Plant No. I sludge dewatering a (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of November 9, 1977, authorizing completion of Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1D, by Districts' force account, and approving increase in the maximum amount for said work from $57,706.00 to $109,200.00. See page "G" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of two surplus District cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-125, authorizing execution of Lease/Purchase Agreement with Envirotech Corp. re evaluation of solids dewatering filter press for Interim Solids Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, in form approved by the General Counsel, for a maximum amount of $10,000. (Up to 8711% of cost to be reimbursed to Districts pursuant to existing agreement with LA/OMA) See page "H" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of Used Grader, Specification No. A-093, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight; and purchase of Used Loader, Specification No. A-094, for an amount not to exceed lus tax and freight, to be used for sludge composting operation (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) J -3- {11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of notion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of 12 Cylinder Head Replacement Units for dual fuel gas engines at Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-094, for an amount not to exceed $20,000 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure necessary contracting services up to $4,500 for pavement repairs, house lateral extensions, adjustment of sewer manhole frames and covers and related work from qualified firms immediately available to perform said work, without competitive bidding, as required by Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 34220 to Haul-Away Containers, to increase maximum amount from $4,500 to $6,000 for added disposal services required due to storm damages during 1978-79 DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from R. E. and Terry Hurst for annexation of .607 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 - Hurst Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page (n) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-127-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 165.676 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-128-2, accepting Grant of Easement from Santa Fe Land Improvement Company for right-of-way in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, at no cost to the District. See page '•J" DISTRICT S (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file. and support .the request of Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency, dated June 15, 1978, for all member agencies to vigorously enforce their current provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision developments that are tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. See page "K" DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-129-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 - Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (ll) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-130-7, ordering annexation of 11.027 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 76 - Tract No. 9874 to County Sanitation District No. 7 END--OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any 1 L� -5- (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing appointment of Director to serve as the Districts' representative on the Southern Calr ornia Association of Governments 208 Program Committee, to replace retired Director Frances Wood (14) ALL DISTRICTS Presentation by LA^'/OMA � presentative re sludge disposal alternatives (1S) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report re dedication ceremonies for 50 MGD Activated Slud e Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Status report re continued levy of ad valorem special assessment vs. flat rate special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be collected on the tax roll for funding 1978-79 budgetary requirements (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions in connection with preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, pursuant to 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated June 29, 1978. See page (b) Consideration of motion amending March 8, 1978, Board action to authorize the General Manager to engage the services of consulting firms for the purpose of gathering required information for application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, and increasing the total maximum authorization from $50,000 to an amount not to exceed $125,000 (c) Consideration of motion amending April 12, 1978, Board actions re engagement of consulting services (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b ') : (1) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $15,000 to $20,000 (2) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment require- ments, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $7,500 to $45,000 (d) Consideration of actions authorizing engagement of consulting services for the following (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b") : (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of J. B. Gilbert & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000 (Item #17 continued on page 7) -6- i (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (d) (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of K. P. Lindstrom 6 Associates for services on a per diem fee _ basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $8,000 (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract for services with outside laboratories for toxic analysis work, for a total amount not to exceed $25,000 (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract with various firms for mapping and drafting services, for a total amount not to exceed $9,500 (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (18) (a-1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment ITEMS ON Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, providing for a change in the SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA final completion date from 45 days to 90 days, and providing that the work shall commence within 30 days from the date of the contract Roll call Vote or Cast (a-2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-126, to receive and file Unanimous Ballot tlid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for ITEMS ON Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA to Sully Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $100,180.00 See pages "I" and "II" (a-3) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment ITEMS ON Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, authorizing a deduction of $21,960.00 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA from the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company due to a deletion of bid items 7 and 8 re sidewalk and ramp at the sludge hopper. See page "III" (19) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 �( \a/ (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster ITEMS ON Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, clarifying SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA insurance requirements and revising page 5 of the Proposal re Bid Item No_ 8 f (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 Y � (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5i) Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any Roll Call Vote or Cast (27) (a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-131-7, ordering Unanimous Ballot annexation of 1.555 acres of territory to the District in the ITEMS ON vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda Drive in the Lemon SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 61 - La Vereda Drive Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (28) DISTRICT 7 JI Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 f (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any, I . f (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 y (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John Wertin Development Corporation, dated June 30, 1978, requesting annexation on behalf of the property owners of approximately 3,331 acres of territory located north of the Santa Ana River and easterly of the terminus of Esperanza Road. See page limit NOTE: The proponents request that fees be paid on 1,508 acres of territory proposed for urban use.based upon the annexation acreage fee in �effect`�on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal annual installments commencing one year following annexation, with interest at 6% per annum; and deferral of acreage fees on the balance of 1,823 acres of open space until service is required for said acreage, at which time annexation acreage fees would be due and payable at the fee in effect at the time service is provided. (b) Presentation by proponents (c) Report of General Counsel (d) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare a report re proposed annexation for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting on July 19, 1978 (32) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 J J 7 0 I -8- . � BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270E Telephones: Area Code 714 BOARDS 962•24540.2910 J oI r 1 . AGENDA .MEETING DATE JULY 12, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE -CALL THE' MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD IN ADDITION, STAFF WIL L BE AVAILABLE AT / :00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 2 - June 14,. 1978, regular, June 21, 1978, adjourned and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 3 June 143 19782 regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District S June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 6 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 7 - June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 11 - June 14, 1978, regular -and June 22, 1978, adjourned (7) Annual election of Joint Chairman - Nominee: Director Don Saltarelli (8) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman - Nominee: Director Don Fox r (9) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel �vrrr� (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be .regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND - See page(s) "At' and "c" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND - See page(s) "A" and licit DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 - NONE DISTRICTS S F 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 7 - See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 - See page(s) "B" and "D" (11) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS NOSe II(A) THROUGH MR) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be' removed from lithe consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public. in attendance, there .will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving -all motions,- and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. ...All items -removed. 'from the consent calendar , shall be considered in the regular order of business.- Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter- the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from • the consent calendar. ''�•�' Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- - (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS kq� (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-031, to Hooker Chemical Corporation, for the price of .0817 per pound. See page �tE � (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1978-79 fiscal year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,100 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Rosswood Industries, Inc. in the amount of $19,375.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-124, authorizing payment of interest earned on invested commingled funds to the fund in which the interest is accrued. See page "F" nsideration of motion authorizing payment to Bird Machine Company i t of $7,000.00 for rental of planetary gear unit for use during the re uge gear box�unit at Reclamation Plant No. 1 sludge7tew=ater�in a ' (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of November 9, 1977, authorizing completion of Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1D, by Districts' force account, and approving increase in the maximum amount for said work from $57,706.00 to $109,200,00. See page (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of two surplus District cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-125, authorizing execution of Lease/Purchase Agreement with Envirotech Corp. re evaluation of solids dewatering filter press for Interim Solids Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, in form approved by the General Counsel, for a maximum amount of $10,000. (Up to 872% of cost to be reimbursed to Districts pursuant to existing agreement with LA/OMA) See page "H" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of Used Grader, Specification No. A-093, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight; and purchase of Used Loader, Specification No. A-094, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight, to be used for sludge composting operation (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of notion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of 12 Cylinder Head Replacement Units for dual fuel gas engines at Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Specificatiorlwo' No. E-094, for an amount not to exceed $20,000 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure necessary contracting services up to $4,500 for pavement repairs, .house lateral extensions, adjustment of sewer manhole frames and covers and related work from qualified firms immediately available to . perform said work, without competitive .bidding, as required by Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General ?Manager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 34220 to Haul-Away Containers, to increase maximum amount from $4,500 to $6,000 for added disposal services required due to storm damages during 1978-79 .DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from R. E. and Terry Hurst for annexation of .607 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 - Hurst Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" (n) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-127-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 165.676 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-128-2, accepting Grant of Easement from Santa Fe Land Improvement Company for right-of-way in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, at no cost to the District. See page '.J" DISTRICT 5 (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file. and support .the request of Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency, dated June 15, 1978, for all member agencies to vigorously enforce their current provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision developments that are tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. See page "K" DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-129-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 - Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (I1) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-130-7, ordering annexation of 11.027 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 76 - Tract No. 9874 to County Sanitation District No. 7 END -OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration. of items deleted from consent calendar, if any / -5- (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing appointment of Director to serve as the Districts' representative on the Southern California Association of Governments 208 Program Committee, to replace retired Director Frances Wood (14) ALL DISTRICTS Presentation by LA/OMA representative re sludge disposal alternatives (15) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report re dedication ceremonies for 50 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Status report re continued levy of ad valorem special assessment vs. flat rate special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be collected on the tax roll for funding 1978-79 budgetary requirements (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions in connection with preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, pursuant to 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated June 29, 1978. See page "VI (b) Consideration of motion amending March 8, 1978, Board action to authorize the General Manager to engage the services of consulting firms for the purpose of gathering required information for application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, and / increasing the total maximum authorization from $50,000 to an amount not to exceed $125,000 (c) Consideration of motion amending April 12, 1978, Board actions re engagement of consulting services (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b ') : (1) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 19783 engaging the Southern California Coastal dilater Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $15,000 to $20,000 (2) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment require- ments, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $7,500 to $45,000 (d) Consideration of actions authorizing engagement of consulting services for the following (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b") : (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposald of J. B. Gilbert & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000 (Item #17 continued on page 7) -6- (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (d) (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of K. P. Lindstrom & Associates for services on a per diem fee �..•' basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $8,000 (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract for services with outside laboratories for toxic analysis work, for a total amount not to exceed $25,000 (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract with various firms for mapping and drafting services, for a total amount not to exceed $9,500 (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-126, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, to , in the amount of $ (See Supplemental Agenda - Bid opening 7/11/78) (19) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978 (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978 (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978 (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 -7- (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 3S - Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John Wertin Development Corporation, dated June 30, 1978, requesting annexation on behalf of the property owners of approximately 3,331 acres of territory located north of the Santa Ana River and easterly of the terminus of Esperanza Road. See page limit NOTE: The proponents request that fees be paid on 1,S08 acres of territory proposed for urban use based upon the annexation acreage fee in effect on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal annual installments commencing one year following annexation, with interest at 6% per annum; and deferral of acreage fees on the balance of 1,823 acres of open space until service is required for said acreage, at which time annexation acreage fees would be due and payable at the fee in effect at the time service is provided. (b) Presentation by proponents (c) Report of General Counsel (d) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare a report re proposed annexation for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting on July 19, 1978 (32) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 �d -8- ROAMS OF DIRECTOIRS Counij Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 JOINT I T BOARDS 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JULY 12, 1978 - 7 :30 P .M. ALL DISTRICTS (18) (a-1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, providing for a change in the final completion date from 45 days to 90 days, and providing that the work shall commence within 30 days from the date of the contract (a-2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-126, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, to Sully Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $lo0,180.00 See pages "I" and "II" Ca-3) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, authorizing a deduction of $21,960.00 from the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company due to a deletion of bid items 7 and 8 re sidewalk and ramp at the sludge hopper. See page "III" DISTRICT 3 (21) (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, clarifying insurance requirements and revising page 5 of the Proposal re Bid Item No. 8 DISTRICT 7 (27) (a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-131-7, ordering annexation of 1.555 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda Drive in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 61 - La Vereda Drive Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) RESOLUTION NO. 78-126 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT N0. 1, JOB NO. PW-062 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 6, 7 and 11 of Orange •County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to SULLY MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY. for MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 13 JOB NO. PW-062, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-062 be awarded to Sully Miller Contracting Company in the total amount of $7,822.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained -therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract for said work pursuant to the provisions of -the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. "I" AGENDA ITEM #18(A-2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I" B I D T A B U L A T Y 0 N S H E E T =` ' JOB NO. PW-062 PROJECT TITLE Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1 *'PROJECT DESCRIPTION Clearing, excavating, hauling, backfilling and compacting the subgrade of Ehe area to be pave . ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 100, 000. 00 BUDGET. AMOUNT $ REMARKS • CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID Sully-Miller Orange, CA $100,180. 00 2. . R.J. Noble Co.. _ Orange, CA $108, 783. 50 •3' Hardy & Harper, Inc: Tustin, CA $119, 334. 00 40 I have reviewed the bids for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062 and found the bid of Sully-Miller Contracting Company of Orange to be the lowest and best bid. I, therefore, recommend award of Job No. PW-062 to Sully--Miller Contracting Company in the amount of $100,180.00. i k iBe nedetto Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation for award of Job No. PW-062. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer "II" AGENDA ITEM #18(A-2) - ALL DISTRICTS "IV COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C.O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR:_Sully-Miller Contracting Company DATE_ July 12, 1978 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 Amount of this Change Order (DEDUCT) $ (21,960.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated July 11, 1978. DEDUCT: ' At the option of the Sanitation Districts, Bid Items Nos. 7 and 8 are hereby deleted from the contract. Bid Item No. 7 1,800 S.F. of P.C.C. sidewalk at $2. 40/S.F. for a total price of $ 4,320.00 Bid Item No. 8 New ramp at sludge hopper for the lump sum price of 17,640.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $21,960. 00 Original Contract Price $ 100,180. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (KM (DEDUCT) $ (21,960.00 ) Amended Contract Price $ 78,220.00 Board authorization date: July 12, 1978 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 'may By Contractor Chief Engineer "III-1" AGENDA ITEM #18(A-3) - ALL DISTRICTS "III-1" 6145 SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD'I P.©:'130X 432'/ORANGE.CALIRORNIA 97669 /(71 4►G39-1400 I714I 547-097R J .,•. Ll. m - - ••it+.'weft✓.w..An. CONTRACTING CO. *78 JUL 12 P12 :�() C.S.L-t. : . Jut y 11, 1978 County Sanitation Dizti ictz Ojucng e, Cat i6 ohrr i.a Attn: Nick D.iBenedetto Senio,% BngineeA Re: Ace taneous Paving at Ttea.tment P.eant #1 Genttemen: . Rega&di.ng outs telephone conve sati.on o6 Juty 12, 1978, Suttey-h',LU-eA Cont&ac t i.ng Co. agneez to pnoeeed with the above p to j ec t with the knowledge that bid .item numbetus .6even and eight may be deteted 6,.om oun wojLk. S.cnceAety, S -L --MILLER CONTRACTING C . Ga&y Ahead P)to j cc t Bps timatm GAf/ag - "III-2" AGENDA ITEM #18(A-3) - ALL DISTRICTS "III-2" GENERAL F NGINCERING CONTRACTOR • SINCE 1023 • ASPHALT & ROCK PRODUCTS MANUF ACTUFIEF1 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT ., Post Office Box 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 JOINT BOARDS 9622411 Regular Meeting July 12 , 1978 - 7 : 30 p .m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager' s Report , we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer' s estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the -- contracts being recommended for award. Joint Boards Nos. 7 & 8 - Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman. Nominations for the positions of Chairman and 'Vice Joint Chairman were made at the regular June meeting. There is only one nominee for each office; for Joint Chairman, Director Donald Saltarelli; for Vice Joint Chairman, Director Donald Fox. All Districts Adjournment to July 19th - 6 :00 p.m. All Districts will adjourn to 6 : 00 p .m. , July 19th, to conduct a public hearing re proposed flat-rate charge special assessment to be collected on the tax roll for 1978/79 fiscal year. No. 11-a - Awarding Purchase of Specification No. P-031. Public bids were taken on June 27th for purchasing caustic soda solution for use at the Odor Control Facilities at Plants Nos . 1 and 2 for one year beginning Aiirfist 20th. Five companies bid, ranging in price from $ . 0817 per .pound to $ . 0828 per pound. The low bid was submitted by Hooker Chemical of Buena Park, which is 1k(, per pound lower than the current contract price. The staff recommends award to the low bidder. No. 11-b - Membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) . The staff is recommending continued membership in SARFPA. The action appearing in the agenda authorizes payment of the annual dues of $1, 100. This agency' s membership is made up of cities and other public entities within the flood plain of the Santa Ana River, and its objective is to obtain Congressional authority and funds for needed improvements to the River Basin' s flood protection facilities . No. 11-d - Application of Interest Earned on Invested Comingled Funds . Currently, the interest earned on District-invested comingled County funds is credited to the individual Districts ' Operating Funds . The County Treasurer' s office has changed their accounting system to permit the application of interest earned to the fund on which the interest is earned. Resolption No. 78-124 will authorize the County Treasurer to apply the interest earned to the specific funds.. The staff recommends approval . No. 11-f - Completion of Foster Outfall Booster Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-1D. In September, 1974, one bid was received for the installation of two additional pumping units complete with engine drives and gear boxes to be added to the Foster Ocean Outfall Booster Pumping Station at Plant No . 2. The bid was $1 , 678 , 100, which was con- siderably over the engineer' s estimate . Based on the staff' s recommendation, the Boards rejected the bid and directed the staff to accomplish the work by force account •and to negotiate for the purchase of proprietary equipment required for the project. Four equipment installation contracts have been awarded in assisting the Districts to complete the work as authorized. The project is nearing completion and it is estimated that the final work, including the Districts ' engineering, administration and inspection and overhead, will cost $109, 200 (total estimated final cost of $1 ,586 , 504 - $91 ,596 less than the rejected bid) . The staff recommends that the Boards approve the completion cost estimate in order that this project can be finished as soon as possible. No. 11-g - Surplus Cement Mixing Trucks . During the late spring and summer of 1976 , Districts ' personnel were processing and composting digested sewage solids at Plant No. 2. Two used cement mixing trucks were purchased to aid in this operation. With the purchase of the additional sludge handling and processing equipment for composting operations offsite , the staff feels that the cement mixers are surplus as they would be inefficient for trucking sludge any distance. The- staff is requesting authority to dispose of the two cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner . Present fixed asset value, $8 , 639 each. -2- No. 11-h - Lease Purchase Agreement for Solids Dewatering Filter Press . In the Districts ' efforts to research solids dewatering equipment, two companies have offered, through the LA/OYA project, belt filter presses which are scheduled to be located at the Districts ' facilities for testing and evaluation. In recent months , discussions have been held with representatives of the Ralph B. Carter Company and the Envirotech Corporation regarding their respective solids dewater- ing equipment. The Envirotech press is a new, yet untested, machine; however, special attention was given to the design of the gravity drainage and high pressure zones which, from the LA/OMA studies , indicate to be the sensitive areas of a solids dewatering filter press . The staff is requesting authority to execute a lease pur- chase agreement with Envirotech Corporation for this unit, which is now available for installation at Plant No. 1 . The lease pur- chase will be $1,500 per month, and the staff is requesting an authorization in an amount not to exceed $10 ,000 for a six-month evaluation period. Under previous authorization, the Districts will enter into an agreement with LA/OMA for reimbursement for the rental fees and the authorized evaluation program to be performed by District personnel. In the event this unit proves satisfactory, the staff will then report to the Boards as to the feasibility of purchasing the unit and all rental costs would apply toward the final purchase price. No. 11-i - Authority to Purchase Solids Processing Equipment. As reported to the Directors in June , the staff is actively engaged in securing a more permanent means of disposal for the digested sewage solids processed at Plants Nos . 1 and 2 . Recent discussions held with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, State and County Health Departments , County Solid Waste Manage- ment Division and representatives from The Irvine Company have resulted in concurrence with the plan of composting our sludges at the Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill until 1981, at which time the landfill will be closed and the County' s lease with The Irvine Company will be terminated. After 1981, the staff is pursuing the feasibility of •composting and disposal of our sludges at a future solid waste disposal site to be operated by the Solid Waste Manage- ment Division in the event the LA/OMA Project has not found a long- range solution for our Districts . Composting operations are planned to commence no later than October 1 of this year and the staff has been seeking the necessary equipment required for this operation. At the June meeting, autho- rization was given for the purchase of a rototiller tractor in an amount not to exceed $51,000. The staff has located two additional -3- pieces of equipment required for the composting operation. A used r.,+ grader (blade) and a used loader have been located and are available for purchase. The staff is requesting authority to purchase a used grader in an amount not to exceed $40, 000 (new unit cost $115, 000) and a loader , also in an amount not to exceed $40 , 0.00 (new price $217 , 000) . No. ll-j - Authorization to Purchase Gas Engine Cylinder Heads . Currently we have nine Waukesha dual fuel gas engines for the main sewage pump drives at Plant No . 2 . Recent repairs to two of the engines have depleted many of the spare parts which are main- tained for emergency, as well as scheduled maintenance on these critical drive units . The staff is requesting authority for the General Manager to negotiate for the purchase of twelve cylinder head replacement units in an amount not to exceed $20,000. No. it-k - Authorization for Construction Services for Pavement Repairs House Lateral Extensions and Relate Wor . Under the present purchasing resolution, the staff is required to solicit three competitive bids for services in excess of $500, but less than $4, 500. There have been many instances, particularly this past year, where pavement failures resulting from the heavy rainfall ; extensions of house laterals and other related work were V not accomplished in a reasonable period of time to minimize the impacts and inconveniences to the public because extended periods of time were required to secure competitive quotations for the work. Many contractors have failed to quote competitively on this type of work because of the unknowns associated with the repair work. The staff is , therefore , requesting authority to secure the most competitive and available contractor to perform pavement repairs , house lateral extensions , adjustment of manhole frames and covers , and other similar work to minimize the impacts and inconveniences to the public. This authorization would only waive the provision of competitive quotations in these instances and would not change the purchasing resolution with the limitations contained therein. No . 11-1 - Authorizing Payment for Trash Pick Up Services . Each year, two purchase orders are issued for trash pick up services for the treatment facilities . One is for the customary weekly trash pick up , while the other is for the -large trash con- tainers which are used on an as-needed basis. During the 1977-78 fiscal year, because of the debris caused by the winter wind and rain storms , the costs associated with the containers have exceeded the staffs- purchasing authorization of $4,500. We request authority to increase the purchase -order maximum amount from $4 500 to $6 ,000 payable to Haul-Away Containers for the 1977-78 fiscal year. -4- District No. 2 r.r No. 11-n - Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011. Warmington Development Company and The Baldwin Company have requested annexation of 165 . 676 acres of territory located in the City of Yorba Linda, near the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive . This matter was received and filed at the June Board meeting and referred to the staff for report. The City of Yorba Linda approved the EIR on this proposed development in September of last year , and have approved the tract map. The proposed development will contain 341 single-family units and will be served by the City of Yorba Linda and the Yorba Linda County Water District. This development generally conforms to the District' s Master Plan. The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-127-2 initiating proceedings for this proposed annexation. No. 11-o - Acce tin Grant of Easement from Santa Fe Land Company re Contract No. -20 . The alignment for the Orchard (Kellogg) Subtrunk, extending from La Palma Avenue to Orangethorpe Avenue requires the acquisition of the sewer easement across property which is owned by the Santa Fe Land Company. The alignment of the sewer will be located in a future street right of way and the Santa Fe Land Company has offered to grant a sewer easement to the Districts at no cost. Acceptance of this easement is therefore recommended in form approved by the General Counsel. District No. 5 No. 11-D - Request of Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) to Enforce Provisions of Erosion Regulations . All member agencies of NIWA have been asked to cooperate in the enforcement of regulations for prevention of erosion from sub- division developments tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. While the Sanitation District is not directly involved in erosion pre- vention, it is recommended that the District Board go on record supporting the request of the planning agency. District No. 7 No. ll-q - Initiation of Annexation No . 81 - Tract No. 9407 . In June , the Directors referred to the staff for study and recommendation the application from Edgewater Development Company for the annexation of 6. 218 acres of territory located in the vicinity of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange. The proposed development is for eight single-family resi- dences with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet per lot. This -5- proposed development has been approved by the City of Orange, and it is in conformance with the District ' s Master Plan. The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-129-7 , initiating pro- ceedings for this annexation. No. 11-r - Ordering Annexation No. 76 . At the February meeting , the Board initiated annexation pro- ceedings for Tract No. 9874, which is located in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Sunnymead Street in the City of Orange. The tract is approximately 11 acres and will contain sixteen single- family residences with a minimum lot area of 20, 000 square feet. The proposed development is in conformity to the Districts ' Master Plan for land use and the local sewers will be maintained by the City of Orange. The staff therefore recommends approval of Reso- lution No . 78-130-7 , ordering annexation of this parcel to the District. All necessary fees have been paid by the proponent. Joint Boards No. 13 - Appointment of District Representative on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. Retired Director Frances Wood has advised that she is resigning her appointed position representing the Districts on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. Joint Chairman Saltarelli is requesting nomina- tions from active and alternate Board members to fill this vacancy. The 208 planning project is scheduled to be completed in approxi- mately 6 months and involves generally two full days a month in meetings in Los Angeles by our representative. Dennis Reid, Senior Engineer of the Districts ' staff, is usually in attendance at the meetings and has represented the appointed District Director in the Director' s absence. The Districts ' appointed representative can receive $50 plus per diem and mileage for the two . full days re- quired in Los Angeles each month. No. 14• - Presentation by LA/OMA representative re Sludge Disposal Alternatives . The LA/OMA staff has requested a place on the agenda to make a brief presentation concerning the sludge disposal alternatives that have been determined as feasible methods for solving, the long- range wastewater solids disposal problem. The LA/OMA project is a regional wastewater solids management program for the Los. Angeles/ Orange County metropolitan area, which is funded primarily by the EPA and the California State Water Resources Control Board. This is a joint powers study project involving the City of Los Angeles , Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts , and our agency. Currently, the sludge management projects which have been developed by the study are undergoing public review. A LA/OMA representative will make a brief presentation concerning the several projects that are under consideration for ultimate development. -6- No. 15 - Arrangements for August 9th Dedication Ceremony. Plans are being made for a brief dedication ceremony and tour of the Districts ' new $30 million Improved Treatment Faci- lities at Plant No. 1 , for 6 : 30 p.m. , preceding the August Joint Board meeting. John Bryson, Chairman of the State Water Resources Control Board and Paul DeFalco , Jr. , the Environmental Protection Agency' s Regional Administrator, will be guest speakers . Because of the timing of the dedication ceremony, a light dinner will be served to the Directors immediately preceding the August Joint Board meeting. No . 16 - Status Re ort on Public Hearin Jul 19th, for Levy of Flat-Rate Specia Assessment or Sewer Service . This week, the Districts ' staff mailed 408 , 000 notices to property owners relative to the proposed flat rate assessments for sewer service for the 1978-79 fiscal year. Enclosed for the Directors is a copy of the post card notice . As of now, we have no idea as to the public response that may be generated. A verbal status report will be given next Wednesday evening. No additional information is avail- able at this time concerning the prospects for the Districts to continue the levy of the variable ad valorem special assessment on the tax bill. No. 17 - Application for Waiver of Secondary Treatment Require- ments . In March, the Boards authorized the General Manager to engage consultants in an amount not to exceed $50, 000 for the purpose of gathering the required information to submit an application to the EPA for waiver of secondary treatment requirements for marine dis- charge. Subsequently, at the April meeting , the Directors approved initial work to commence by John Carollo Engineers , in an amount not to exceed $7 ,500, and by Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) in an amount not to exceed $15 , 000. The staff has reviewed the EPA regulations concerning the application and the various tasks required for the submittal of the application to be filed with EPA no later than September 24 of this year. In- cluded with this agenda material is an itemized, revised budget in the amount of $125 ,000 . Various tasks required in the gathering of the material have been assigned to those firms and individuals who can best assist the staff in this effort. John Carollo Engin- eers , SCCWRP , Dr. Norman Brooks and Dr. Koh are familiar with the Districts ' operational procedures and- are knowledgeable of the effects of the wastewater discharge to the Pacific Ocean. John Carollo Engineers is also knowledgeable as to the performance of the treatment plant facilities and will assist the staff in pre- paring the effects of the pretreatment programs which affect the industrial waste segment of our wastewaters . J. B. Gilbert and u Associates and Kris Lindstrom (a former employee of J . B. Gilbert) were, and continue to be, involved in the Districts ' EIS -7- preparation and the secondary impacts . Several maps and charts will be required which cannot be done by our staff within the specified time limits . The EPA has requested a very extensive analysis of the wastewaters to determine the concentration of over 100 toxic compounds . Many of these compounds cannot be analyzed by the Districts' laboratory and may require the services of an.outside laboratory. The staff feels that this may be an unnecessary requirement in the application and will continue dis- cussing the matter with EPA officials for further clarification. In the event it is an effort which must be performed , it is felt that the analysis must be made by an EPA-approved laboratory. It is , therefore, the staff' s recommendation that the waiver application budget be approved as submitted and that authorization be given to the consultants listed therein in the amounts shown for a total not to exceed $125 ,000 . It is the staff' s understanding in discussing the preparation of the waiver application with the City of San Diego and consultants employed by the City of San Francisco that their budget amount is in excess of $300 ,000 (City of Los Angeles , $100, 000 - Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts , $125 , 000) . No. 18 - Awardin Contract for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No . 1 - Job No. PW- b . Public bids will be received on July llth for repair, re- surfacing and a sand slurry coating for the asphalt paving at Plant No. 1 . This project includes construction of a public side- walk on Ellis Avenue easterly of the main entrance to the plant. The engineer' s estimate for the project ,is $100 ,000. The staff will make its recommendations relative to award of a contract at next Wednesday' s meeting. District No. 2 No . 31 - Proposed Annexation No. 35 - Bryant Ranch. John Wertin Development Corporation has submitted a letter requesting annexation of approximately 3 , 331 acres (Bryant Ranch) to the District. The territory is located north of the Santa Ana River easterly of the terminus of Esperanza Road. The proponent is requesting that fees be paid on 1508 acres based on the annexa- tion acreage fee in effect on June 30 , 1978 , payable in seven equal installments and an indefinite deferral of annexation fees on the balance of 1823 acres which will remain as "open space" . Because of the size of the proposed annexation and the re- quested deviations from the District' s general policy regarding payment of required fees, the staff has invited the proponents to make a presentation to the Directors prior to the preparation of any requested staff report . If itis determined that the -8- matter is urgent and must be resolved immediately, the staff suggests that action on the proposed annexation and conditions , if any, could be formally considered at the scheduled adjourned meeting July 19th. In the event the Districts ' General Counsel and staff are directed by the Board to proceed with working, out conditions of annexation next Wednesday, it is the staff' s recommendation that the proponent be requested to deposit immediately with the District an additional $2, 000 to defray costs generated by staff time for preparing the necessary agreements and the recommendation report. Fred A. Harper General Manager -9- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JULY -12, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUINE 202 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 42065 Air California, Air Fare $ 64,50 42066 All Seals, Inc. , Valve Parts 310.56 42067 American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts 554.20 42068 The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Parts 193.42 42069 Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Truck Parts 27.61 . 42070 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies 121.50 42071 Hilary Baker, Employee Mileage 44.94 42072 Banning Battery Company, Batteries 652.33 42073 Benner Sheet ?fetal., Inc. , Machine Shop !York 397.50 ••• 42074 James Benzie, --Employee Mileage 42.66 42075 Black & Decker Mfg. Company, Tool Repair 39.50 42076 Blue Diamond Materials, Building Materials 130.50 42077 Don Bogart, Travel Expense Reimbursement 51.94 42078 11. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage 27.18 42079 Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies 128.92 42080 Cal' State Seal Company, Lubricants 18.96 42081 Cal Plant Engineering Service, Compressor Repair 288.00 42082 Case Power & Equipment, Engine Parts 457.79 42083 Century Fiberglass, Flange Installation 400.00 42084 Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline 11883.94 42085 Civic Center Lock $ Safe, Keys 13.30 42086 Clark Dye Hardware, Small Hardware 31.71 42087 College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber 148.34 42088 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies - 235.00 42089 Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine 5.0620.92 42090 Controlco, Pump Parts 369.38 42091 Control Specialists, Inc., Instrumentation .118.83 42092 Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts 44.99 42093 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts 618.68 42094 Void .00 42095 Daily Pilot, Employment Ad 38.02 42096 Eastman, Inc. , Office Supplies 58.30 42097 Enchanter, Inc. , Ocean Monitoring 31000.00 42098 Farr Company, Air Conditioning Parts 247.09 42099 Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts 922.48 42100 Foothill Feed Company, Equipment Parts 155.56 42101 Fountain Valley Camera, Camera and.Photo Processing 268.01 42102 Fredson, Truck Parts 18.85 42103 Freeway Machine & Welding, Equipment Repair 86.50 42104 Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Engine Parts 105.07 42105 City of Fullerton, Water 44.27 42106 General Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies 887.96 42107 General -Telephone Company, Phone Service 42295.55 42108 Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal 62370.00 42109 Gould Inc., Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Fittings 124.45 42110 George T. Hall Company, Pump Parts 22.72 42111 John Haslett Company, Pump Parts 11215.30 42112 Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts 118.46 42113 Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Compressor Parts 477.33 42114 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease 819.23 42115 House of Batteries, Batteries 447.11 42116 City of Huntington Beach, Water 10.80 42117 Industrial Asphalt, Building Materials 12.34 42118 J D Packaging & Sales, Masking Tape 171.72 42119 Kaman Bearing $ Supply, Pump Parts 324.95 42120 Kelley Blue Book, Vehicle Blue Book 40.00 ",�-1" AGENDA ITEM #.E10 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-1" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 - • WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS NIOUNT 42121 King Bearing, Inc., Bearing and Pump Parts 792.17 42122 Kleen-Line Corporation, Hardware 1S4.38, 42123 Knox Industrial Supplies, Paint Supplies 219.79 42124 LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies 810.84 42125 L F N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Rental 12192.28 42126 Lancaster Upholstery, Mower Bag 45.90 42127 Larry's Building Materials, Inc., Building Materials 45.05 42128 Laursen Color Lab, Film 'Processing 60.42 42129 Lewco Electric Company, Starter Repair 68.00 42130 Long Beach Safety Council, Safety Pamphlets 33.76 42131 McBain Instruments, Lab Supplies 84.51 42132 McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Hardware and Tools S13.28 42133 Mar Vac Electronics, Welding Supplies q6 105.79 42134 Paul A. Mitchell, Employee Mileage 18.46 42135 Moore Products Company, Engine Parts 146.18 42136 E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Cover 229.86 42137 Motorola, Inc., Communications Equipment 346.94 42138 Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals' 1,439.78 42139 National Academy of Sciences, Science Manual 21.45 42140 National Lumber Supply, Building Materials 205.11 42141 O'Rings, Inc. , O'Rings 28.85 42142 Orange County Employees Retirement System, OCERS Transfer Balance 71735.44 42143 Orange County Farm Supply Company, Landscape-Supplies 479.96 42144 M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauge 135.94 42145 Jose Pena, '.deed Abatement 300.00 42146 B. Dalton Pickwick, Techinal Books 339.15 42147 Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies 387.27 42148 Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice 15.90 42149 Productool, Inc. , Tools 16.22 42150 Pyramid Fence Company, Fence Parts 95.19 42151 Quality Building Supply, Building Materials 275.60 42152 Quality Typewriter Maintenance, Office Supplies 24.33 421S3 Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal 83.70 42.154 Dennis 14. Reid, Employee Mileage 72.90 42155 Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts 245.36 42156 Safety Research Corporation, Paint Supplies 90.95 42157 Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts 17.39 42158 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor 474.53 42159 Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies 58.90 42160 City of Seal Beach, Water 5.50 42161 Seal Black Company,- Inc. , Building Materials 69.32 42162 Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies 34.92 42163 Sight Optical Sales, Equipment Repair 136.00 42164 Sims Industrial Supply, Industrial Supplies 212.00 42165 South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings 208.40 42166 Southern California Edison, Power 55,811 .03 42167 Southern California Gas Company, Gas 1,325.76 42168 Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water 192.26 42169 Stang Hydronics, Inc., Freight 46.54 42170 Starow Steel, Steel Bars 939.37 42171 The Suppliers, Tools and Hardware 87.55 42172 Surveyors Service Company, Building Materials 128.2611 42173 Travel Buffs, Air Fare 894.80 42174 Truck Auto Supply, Inc. , Truck Parts 634.86 42175 United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges 13.42 42176 United States Equipment, Inc. , Pump Parts 11579.85 "A-2" AGENDA. ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-2" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 42177 University Sales & Service, Truck Parts $ 63.71 42178 VBA Cryogenics, Lab Supplies , 45.79 �%wV 42179 Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings 10030.19 42180 Valley Towing, Vehicle Tow 50.00 42181 Valvate Associates, Valve Parts 403.34 42182' VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies 113.76 42183 Vehicle Spring Service, Truck Repair 103.60 42184 Walker & Reobuck Company, Small Tools 75.26 42185 John R. Waples, Odor Control 219.50 -.. .�� 42186 Waukesha Engine _Servicenter, Engine Parts 159.59 42187 Western Electronic Supply Corporation, Electrical Supplies 277.27 42188 Western Salt Company, Lab Salt 126.94 42189 Western Wholesale Company, Truck Parts 75.97 42190 Milton D. Winston, Employee Mileage 32.94 42191 Wood Fumigation & Termite Control, Fumigation 12875.00 42192 Thomas L. Woodruff, General -Counsel 40501.00 42193 Worthington Service Corporation, Machine Repair 12209.67 42194 Xerox Computer Services, Computer Service _ 10,551.98 . 42195 Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction 2$ 79.45 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 136,345.50 "A-3" AGE1,1DA ITEM- #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-3" JOINT DISTRICT'S CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 ` WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OITTLAY REVOLVING, FUND WARPANTS MOUNT 42058 Butier Engineering, Inc. , Contract lianagement P2-23 $ 10,189.75 42059 Eastman, Inc. , Office Furniture 989.95 42060 Osborne Laboratories, Inc. , Testing P2-23-6 1,400.00 42061 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Revenue Program 7,829.14 42062 Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Equipment 2,020.49 . 42063 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-5 52.50 42064 Taylor-Dunn, Electric Carts • .8,087.76 TOTAL CORF $ 300569.59 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CORF $ 1663915.09 "A--Lill AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-4" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 z DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42045 State of California, Annex 21 Processing Fee $ 290.00 42046 Shapell Industries; Inc., Annex 21 Processing Fee O'Pymt 110.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND $ 400.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCM11ULATED'CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42047 John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. , Contract 2-SR $ 172536.50 42048 The Register, Legal Ad, Carbon Canyon EIR 31.36 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND $ 17,567.86 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 $ 17,967.86 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42049 Ador/Hilite, Use Charge O'Pymt $ 19630.80 42050 Charles C. Regan Company, Asphalt Repairs 3,485.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND $ 52115.80 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCU?RJLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42051 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Design Engr. 3-20-3, 3-22-1 $ 10,173.89 42052 Osborne Laboratories, Inc. , Testing 3-20-3, 3-22-1 2,922.50 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND $ 13,096.39 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 $ 18,212.19 "B-l" AGENDA ITEM #r10 - ALL DISTRICTS "B-1" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 ' DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND (WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 'AMOUNT 42055 State of California, Annex 70, 71, 72, and 74 Processing Fee'$ 430.00 42056 Clifford A. Forkert, Aerial Maps 1,08S.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND $ 1,515.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 ACCIPIRILATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42055 Lemon Heights, A Jt. Venture, Annex 71 O'Pymt $ 198.02 420S6 Glen R. Nelson, Annex 74 O'Pymt 98.46 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 ACO FUND $ 296.48 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 $' 1,811.48 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42057 The Register, Legal"Ad, Coastal Permit Hearing $ 243.20 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 11 ACO FUND $ 243.20 1113-2" AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "B-2" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 42280 A $ A Refrigeration Company, Air Conditioning Repair $ 594.22 42281 All Seals, Inc. , Pump Parts 22.26 42282 American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts 627.01 42283 Anaheim Electric Motors, Motor 520.04 42284 Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Repairs 1,520.00 42285 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies 203.86 42286 BPI - Business Publishers, Inc. , Sludge Journal 10.00 42287 L.W. Bemis Tractor & Implements, Generator Parts 127.79 42288 Benz Engineering, Inc. , Gaskets 285.31 42289 Berkley Controls, Inc. , Electrical Supplies 127.20 42290 Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete 127.28 42291 Bomar_ Magneto Service, Inc. , Magneto Parts 89.57 42292 Building News, Inc. , Office Supplies 122.86 42293 CS Company, Engine Parts 494.17 42294 Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Company, Small Hardware 36.86 42295 Cal-Glass .for Research, Inc. , Lab Supplies 9.99 42296 California Auto Collision, Inc. , Vehicle Repair 359.70 42297 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, Re Waiver 406.00 42298 R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage 17.40 42299 Chevron USA, Inc. , Gasoline 29274..20 42300 College Lumber Company, Inc. , Lumber 98.37 42301 Compressor Products, Valve Repair 435.75 42302 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies' 389.67 42303 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 487.11 42304 Costa Hesa Water District, Water 6.00 42305 County Sanitation Districts, Workers Comp. Trust Fund_ 51000.00 42306 Mr. Crane, Crane Rental 492.00 42307 . Crane Systems, Truck Bed 530.00 42308 Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. , Lab Supplies 137.63 42309 Daily Pilot, Employment Ad 101.79 42310 Deco, Electrical Supplies 291.05 42311 Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drilling _ 65.00 42312 Eastman, Inc. , Office Supplies 182.58 42313 Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware 97.07 42314 The Foxboro Company, Electrical Supplies 222.92 42315 Frost Engineering Service Company, Pump Parts 159.54 42316 GW Maintenance, Inc. , Drain Tanks 32.00 42317 General Telephone Company, Phone Service 385.40 42318 Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal 72588.75 42319 Gould, Inc. , Warren & Baily Division, Gauges 194.21 42320 Halsted & Hoggan, Inc. , Hydro Pump 861.75 42321 Harbor Radiator, Fire Extinguishers 431.42 42322 Harrington Industrial, Piping 101.61 4.2323 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Mileage 31.49 - - 42324 Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware 247.59 42325 House of Batteries, Batteries 834.01 42326 Howard Supply Company, Pipe Fittings 830.01 42327 City of Huntington Beach, Water 51.13 14 42328 Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Truck Rentals 152.75 42329 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water 2.00 its 42330 Kelly Pipe Company, Valve 873.65 42331 King Bearing, Inc. , Pump Parts 803.65 42332 K1een-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies 303.79 42333 LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies 256.80 42334 L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Rental 12245.85 "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 42335 Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts $ 49.12 42336 Lawson Products, Inc. , Truck Parts 210.52 42337 Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Safety Supplies 428.90 42338 Los Angeles Chemical Company, Chemical Weed Killer .384.25 42339 Los Angeles Times, Employment Ad 300.00 42340 McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts 110.77 42341 McGee Mfg. Company, Inc. , Grit Diffusers 662.50 42342 McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Small Tools 19.60 42343 National Electrical Mfg. Association, Service Manual 28.00 42344 City of Newport Beach, Plant Water 31.17 42345 Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Service 318.16 42346 Pak ?'hest, Maintenance Supplies 74.03 42347 Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts 911.57 42348 M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges 79.74 42349 Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Lawn MAintenance .Equipment 57.OS 4235O Pickwick Paper Products, Paper Supplies 36.29 42351 Pitney Bowes, Postage Meter 39.75 42352 Polyspede, Power Supply 297.43 42353 Postmaster, Postage 1,000.00 42354 Power Systems, Filters 171.43 42355 Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice 31.80 42356 Productool, Inc., Small Tools 64.72 42357 The Pryor Giggey Company, Building 'Materials 11094.03 42358 Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Steel 310.22 42359 Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts 175.20 42360 Sande Equipment Company, Pump Parts- 74.56 42361 Saylors Artist & Engineering Supply, Engineering Supplies 119.32 42362 Scientific Products, Lab Supplies 135.98 42363 See Optics, Safety Glasses 23.32 42364 Shepherd :Machinery Company, Machine Repair 137.75 42365 Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies 602.54 42366 Simpson-Steppat, Santa Ana River Crossing Plans 288.99 42367 South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies 435.36 42368 Southern California Edison, Power 402158.94 42369. Void .00 42370 Southern California Water Comapny, Water 6.26 42371 Starow Steel, Steel Stock 234.95 42372 State Compensation Insurance Fund, Quarter Premium 142800.00 42373 Super Chem Corporation, Solvent 1,312.55 42374 The Suppliers, Small Hardware 45.79 42375 Tarby Engineering, Pump Parts 58.72 42376 Tektronix, Inc. , Electrical Supplies 9.59 42377 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Stakes 69.96 42378 Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies 48.97 42379 Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Locks 55.07 42380 Tools for Industry; Small Tools 199.28" 42381 Truck $ Auto Supply, Inc. , Truck Parts 331.13 42382 Union Oil Company of California,• Gasoline 42.49 42383 United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges 18.17 -42384 United States Equipment, Inc. , Compressor Parts 915.69 42385 Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools 291.71 42386 VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage 33,60 ¢mil 42387 Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings 430.53 42388 VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies 12357.10 42389 Warren McVeigh & Griffin, Insurance Consultation Fee 12467.57 42390 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts 2,470.52 42391 Westinghouse Electric Corporation, New Motor 11698.04 11C•-2"- . AGENDA ITEM #10 - .ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" .TOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID .TUNE 30, 1978 .WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 42392 Westinghouse Supply Company, Charts $ 263.07 . 42393 Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies 375.05 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 1062159.45 a "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS . "C-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 WARRANT N0. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS M,1OUNT 42268 John Carollo Engineers, P1-16 Instr. Program $ 1,279.04 42269 John Carollo Engineers/Greeley Hansen, Constr. Se'rv. _P2-23 4113S5.33 42270 Forkert Engineering, Engineering PW-067 2,006.75 42271 Global Engineering, Spec P2-23-6 6.36 42272 Hallmark Business Interiors, IW Partitions 295.21 42273 C. H. Leavell & Company, Contract P2-23-3 569,285.60 42274 McFarland Partitions, Administrative Office Partitions 1,915.00 42275 Parts Unlimited, Washer Tank 2,010.82 42276 Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 143,145.05 42277 H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2-23-6 238,210.20 42278 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-5 170.79 42279 Southwest Sewer Equipment, A-084 Sewer Clean 37,975.56 TOTAL CORF $ls037,655.71 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CORF $12143,81S.16 "C-4" AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "C-4" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 4 .DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42253 Lowry and Associates, Engineering 2-5R, 2-19 and 2-20 $ 20962.97 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND $ 2,962.97 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42254 Anaheim Sewer Construction, Los Alamitos Sewer Repair $ 2.9941.80 • TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND $ 2,941.80 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCIRMATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT '%P�422S5 Korkick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 $ 390,955.84 42256 Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. , Contract 3-22-1 162,672.44 42257 Sladden Engineering, Compaction Testing 3-20 and 3-22 1,390.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND $ 555,108.28 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 $ 557,960.08 DISTRICT NO. 7 FIXED OBLIGATIONS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42261 City of Anaheim, Oil Royalties : 541.30 42262 City of Fullerton, Oil Royalties 541.30 42263 City of Orange, Oil Royalties 541.31 42264 City of Santa Ana, Oil Royalties 541.31 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 $ 2,165.22 "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" 'INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAI14S PAID JUNE 30, 1978 DISTRICT NO. 8 ' • OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42265 State of California, Dissolution Fee $ 95.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 8 $ 95.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 42266 Long Beach Independent, Legal•'-Ad .Coast Hwy Trunk HeariDg $ 154.62 42267 The Register, Legal-Ad-Coast Hwy Trunk Hearing 55.78 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 11 $ 210.40 DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANT NO. IN-FAVOR OF MIOUNT � 42258 Daily Pilot, Legal Ad, Santa Ana River Siphon $ 65.25 42259 Portigal $ Hammerton, Litigation 5-19 850.00 42260 Rodding-Cleaning Machines, Inc. , Contract S-B-R 22,335.88 TOTAL DISTRICT 5 $ 6 SUSPENSE $ 233251.13 11D-211 AGENDA ITEM #10 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 June 29, 1978 10644 ELLIS AVENUE 044 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 MEMORAhTDUM TO: Wayne Sylvester FROM: Ted Hoffman SUBJECT: Bid Specification 'P-'031*, 'Caustl'c' *Soda Sealed bids were opened June 27, 1978, for furnishing & delivery of caustic soda solution to Plants 1 and 2 for one (1) year. Starting August 20, 1978, net prices are shown in dry pounds which are converted into- liquid gallons for delivery. The tabulations are' 'as 'follows -. Company City Deliveries of Deliveries of *3 •0*00* 'gallons 4 '0-0G gallons Hooker Chemical Co Buena Park .0617 lb .0617 lb L. A. Chemical South Gate .08717 t` .08717 " Stauffer Chemical Los Angeles .0884 " .0872 " McKesson Chemical Los Angeles .0821 " .0821 " Van Waters & Rogers Los Angeles .0828 " .0817 " It is recommended that the award be made to the low bidder, Hooker Chemical Company, for their low bid price of $,0817 per pound. The new bid price is $. 0156 per pound lower than current contract price. There is an option for renewal of contract for one year after first year agreement in accordance with provisions listed in contract clause. xTotpendi u4s for one year based on estimated usage is $25,000. Ted E. Hoffman Chief of Procurement & Property TEH/yh "E" AGENDA ITEM fl1(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "E" RESOLUTION NO. 78-124 AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF INTERESTS EARNED ON COrZIINGLED INVESTMENTS TO APPROPRIATE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 32 S, 60 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHO- RIZING PAYMENT OF INTERESTS EARNED ON COMMINGLED INVESTMENTS TO THE FUND CONTAINING THE PRINCIPAL ON WHICH SAID INTEREST IS EARNED WHEREAS, the existing state' law requires that interest on moneys deposited in a depositary by an officer of a local agency belongs to, and shall be paid quarterly into, the general fund of the local agency, unless otherwise directed by law; and, WHEREAS, recently adopted Assembly Bill No. 2376 provides that notwith- standing such provisions of existing law, except as otherwise directed by law, that if the governing body of the local agency so directs, interest on moneys deposited shall be paid to the fund which contains the principal on which the interest is accrued, NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 61 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to direct County Treasurer to pay interest earned on Districts' commingled funds to the fund which contains the principal on which said interest is accrued. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. "F" AGENDA ITEM #11(D). ALL DISTRICTS "Fn COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 June 28, 1978 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Completion of J-6-1 Work Attached is the current estimated cost of completing J-6-1. When the work done on this job is complete, the predicted total amount spent will be $1, 586,504 compared to $1,678',100 which Bovee and Crail bid on the job in 1974. Compared to the bid price, which includes no Districts' inspection and burden time, the predicted estimate includes money for Districts ' engineering and burden plus money for a number of additions which have been built into the job since the original J-6-1 was bid. These additions include: 1. Having 50-inch pumps installed instead of the 42-inch pumps specified originally. 2. Having larger right angled gear drives installed for the increased thrust from the bigger pumps. 3. Due to the concern of the Districts ' staff and that of the engine supplier, a 30-inch structural steel skid was added beneath each engine to better distribute the engine load on the second floor of Foster Station. 4. The addition of the structural steel skid necessitated the elevation of the roof. The structure of which has been completed. 5. Purchasing fiberglass ventilators in lieu of aluminum ones. Recent experience at the "C" Headworks has shown that aluminum ventilation systems deteriorate rapidly in the salt air -environment of Plant No. 2. The project is at this time operational on natural gas and was used during the past winter to prevent heavy storm loads from having to be discharged into the Santa Ana River. Incorporation of the items shown on the completion cost estimate will permit pump operation on digester gas, the weatherproofing, and finishing of the Foster Station and general operation in a nominal fashion. "G-1 AGENDA ITEM #11(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" . s Ray E. Lewis June 28, 1978 Page Two It is recommended that- the Districts allocate the funds indicated to complete the J-6-1 project. Donald Bogart Senior Engineer DB:ss "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" J-6-1 Completion Cost Estimate 1. Engine Hatches (stucco side walls) $ 2,000.00 2. Roofing Sheet Metal 15,000.00 Roofing Material 4,500.00 3. Digester Gas Piping 15,000.00 4. Concrete Work Pipe Supports and Slabs 4,000.00 Tunnel Covers 5,000.00 5. South Wall Repair .500. 00 6. Install Lube Oil Tank 1,000. 00 7. Accoustical Repair 100000.00 8. Wetwell Fiberglass Vent Pipe 1,500.00 9. Thermal Insulation 1,500.00 10. Tubing, .Engines to Control Panels 2,000.00 11. Install Wall Panel at South End of Building 2,000.00 12. Remodel Walls where Block is not Complete 1,500.00 13. Districts' * Time & Material to Complete 20,000. 00 Sub-Total $ 85,500. 00 14. Districts' Engineering, Administration and Inspection 9,700.00 15. Districts' Vehicles 2,800.00 . _ 16. Districts' Dept. 30, 50, 60 .& 90 Burden. . 11,200.00 Total $109,200. 00 "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" • f RESOLUTION NO. 78-12S APPROVING FILTER PRESS LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 32 S, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILTER PRESS LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH ENVIROTECH CORPORATION FOR RE-EVALUATION OF SOLIDS DEWATERING FILTER PRESS The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain -Lease/Purchase Agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 and Envirotech Corporation re evalu- ation of solids. dewatering filter press for solids handling facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted. Section 2. That payment for lease of said filter press is hereby authorized at $1500 per month plus tax and freight for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000. Section 3. That exercise of a purchase option for said filter press be subject to the prior approval of these Boards of Directors. Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, be and are hereby authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. "H AGENDA ITEM- M(H) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" w "EXIIIBIT A" . PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: To: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. Z. P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection - Example: in the city of Orange, near the int rsectio of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District' s annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: ' Property Owner (If more than one, attach separate listing) Name: Address: City & State: Telephone No. : 7-2? (p r;Q . Gross Acreage: Q,(Q a (to nearest hundredth) Ass sed Value (If more than one parcel, attach separate listing) e ' 6 6o + p0 Number of Registered Voters: Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report if prepared) . Also a check in the amount of $500. 00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. Signature of Property Owner(s) "I" AGENDA ITEM #11(M) - DISTRICT 2 "T" a RESOLUTION NO. 78-128-2 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVE- MENT COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20 The Board of Directors of County- Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California., DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated wherein a permanent easement in the vicinity westerly of Orchard between .La Palma and Orangethorpe for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, is hereby accepted from the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20; and, Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and, Section .5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be authorized and directed to records said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. Hill AGENDA ITEM #11(o) - DISTRICT 2 flit/ 7ts' Newport-Irvine .. Waste-Management Planning Agency Lansing E. Eberling, Chairman Alexander Bowie, Secretary Donald A. McInnis. Vice Chairman Warren D. Fix, Treasurer June 15, 1978 NI 952.7 City of Costa Mesa Honorable Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation City of District No. 5 Irvine P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 City of Attn: Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary Newport Beach Dear Members of the Board of Directors: City of At its meeting of May 2 5 1978, the Board of Orange g Y , Directors of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA) unanimously approved a motion that each of its County of member agencies be formally requested to vigorously enforce Orange its current provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision developments that are tributary to Upper Newport Bay. Orange County As you are aware, NIWA, as part of the 208 Planning Flood Control activities in the South Coast Area, Is preparing a report on District the adequacy of existing administrative controls for the prevention of excessive runoff-related soil erosion from construction and agricultural activities in jurisdictions Orange County tributary to the San Diego Creek and Upper Newport Bay. Harbors. While it is anticipated that recommendations will be developed Beaches&Parks District from these reports for strengthening present ordinances and controls, the NIWA Board of Directors believes that your cooperation at this time to see that existing provisions are Orange County actively enforced will be a first step in protecting the Sanitation Newport Bay from the effects of such activities. District No.5 Very truly yours, Irvine Ranch NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT Water District PLANNING MENCY Orange County By Tairman, Water DistrictL. E. Eberlinor g, Board of Directors . LEE/lac California r•rtment of Pend Game cc: Board of Directors , NIWA Friends of Newport Bay 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1220 Newport Beach, California 92660 714/644-9311 "K" AGENDA ITEM #11(P) - DISTRICT 5 "K" h COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 June 29, 1978 (714)s40.2910 (714)962.2411 S T A F F R E P O R T PREPARATION OF APPLICATION .FOR..WAIVER OF SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS At the March and April meetings, the Boards authorized the General Manager to engage consultants to assist the staff in the preparation of the application to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for waiver of secondary treatment requirements for marine discharge. The staff has reviewed the EPA requirements and has discussed the appli- cation with the Districts ' consultants .and with other agencies who are concurrently preparing their waiver application. Task assignments have been made for the various elements required by the EPA and it is estimated that outside services required will be approximately $125,000 summarized as follows: PREVIOUS MAXIMUM AUTHORI- FEE GENERAL-TASK ASSIGNMENT 'CONSULTANT . . .ZATI.ON REQUIRED Physical assessment, initial dilution, ocean discharge Carollo $ 7,500. $ 45,000. Ocean discharge, marine bio- logical assessment SCCWRP 15,000. 20,000. Review of biological assess- ments & assist in preparation of application Gilbert 0. 10,000. Overall coordination & prep- aration of application Lindstrom 0. 80,000. Initial dilution & plume Norm Brooks 4 ,500. 4 ,500. discharge Robert Koh 3,000. 31000. Toxic analysis Outside Lab 0. 250,000. Mapping, drafting Various 0. 91500. $125,000 . It is necessary that the tasks assigned be completed before September 1st in order to finalize the application to submit to the EPA before the dear'- line of September 24th. It is the staff' s recommendation that the Genel Manager be authorized to engage the consultants as listed herein for the maximum fees set forth. "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #17 W - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" Staff Report June 29, 1978 Page Two It 'is the staff's understanding that other agencies working on waiver applications have obligated funds in excess of the Districts' budget. San Francisco, as an example, has contracted for over $300,000 for outside services to assist their staff, and similarly, the City of San Diego has contracted for approximately $300,000, also for outside services of consultants. REL:hjb "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) - ALL DISTRICTS M , John Wertin ; Development Corporation June 30, 1978 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: We hereby request that the County Sanitation District No. 2 Board of Directors consider at their July 12, 1978 meeting the attached Annexation Agreement for the purpose of annexing the property known as the Bryant Ranch consisting of approximately 3,331 acres located in northeast Orange County north of the Santa Ana River and easterly'of the terminus of Esperanza Road. A legal descrip- tion and preliminary title report 'are enclosed for your information. A legal description to comply with your requirements is being prepared by VTN and should be completed by the end of next week. The following additional information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request: The current property owners are: Ernest A. Bryant, Jr. & Ernest A. Bryant, III, as Co-Trustees under the Will of Susanna Bixby Bryant, and Susanna Dakin Arp, Henry S. Dakin, and Samuel Dana Dakin. Their address is: c/o Rancho Santa Ana 23850 Esperanza Road Anaheim, California 92686 Their telephone number is: (714) 970-8771 2081 Business Center Drive Suite 200 Irvine,California 92715 714-833-3331 "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #31 - DISTRICT 2 "M-1" Mr. Fred Harper Page -two IL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 June 30, 1978 John Wertin is the holder of an option on the property. The current owners have agreed to consent to the annexation upon the finalization of the Annexation Agreement. If you require a letter from the owners verifying this, please advise. Attached is a list of Assessor's Parcels involved and the assessed value (1977-78) . There are six registered voters on the property (only one with ownership) . Also enclosed is the Initial Study, a copy -of an Environmental Impact Report, and a check in the amount of $500. We would further request that copies of any correspondence relating to this matter be directed to the undersigned. If you require any additional information to place this matter before the Board, please give me a call. Very truly yours, ;John A, pi Vice President JAS:j sg cc: Mr. Ernest A. Bryant, III David Colgan, Fulop, Rolston, Burns & McKittrick "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #31 - DISTRICT 2 "M-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b 1.I ALTERNATIVE II Establishing Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service and Immediate Availability to be Collected on the Tax Roll LEGAL OPINION LACY OlPrICtt Of RottrIce & Woodruff su1T9 10:20 1"WOAMCL 4.ROURKt APEA CODE 714 �.«�daa�rr ChLlroANl�► rlwar i�ANK �awaalHt� g�l�■dtlt ALAN R.WATTS 149M NORTH MAIN tiTRi$T :,,• •••a KCrtlawRb A.St�wRt..iR. . . titCCOMlCR • SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 02701 171AI 8i6.776Y ••a }.r ALAN A.SURNa : To: kr. F.A. Harper. County Sanitation Districts From s General 'Counsel - Hates :June 22, 1978 Re: sum lemen't inion re -Assessments - •r �r.w��..�rr - er•t .wr■ • • ■ rr�r ro■rr�■rr�w - - .. .. - This memorand= will serve...-an'.-s .supplement -to that opinion which was forwarded from:. this off ice dated June '. 24, 1978, pertaining to the levy of a special assessment charge on behalf of the Districts for purposes of :funding the budgetary -requirements for the forthcoming fisc$1 year,, I am- advised that in addition to the preparation- of a budget and the act .ori of the'.Board of Directors to Proceed in the exaot same manner -that has been undertaken -in • previous years -relative to establishing a rate that when applied to :the ad .valorem property rolls-. in the County will produce -sufficient revenue. to meet the budgetary- . requirements an alternate form of a -flat rate charge to be ;applied universally :to ..all parcels •in the property, also being considered. As I indicated to you previously, to establish ,such a charge and have it -collected with the annual tax bill, would require- compliance with the provisions of Cali'forns,a Health and Safety Code Sections 5471 et seq. , which I under" . • stand is 'presontly being studied to determine the costs :. and necessary procedures to give the required statutory notices. In reviewing- -the proposal to . establish a uniform flat rate charge for the services rendered by the ,District, I have concluded that •to. do so is essentially the same as outlined in the variable charge procedure which you have utilized in the past and which you contemplate using during fiscal year 1978-79. Specifically, and for the reasons set forth in my opinion letter of June 20, I am of the further opinion that such a charge would also be deemed "a - special assessment charge" and not a "tax" as that term has. • been judicially defined and *those cases cited in the June 20th memorandum. For that reason,' the conclusion relative to Mr. F.-A. Harper { Page Two June 22, 1978 . . - the variable charge is identical with respect .to the flat rate charge--namely; that •the .restrictions imposed by the • enactment -of Proposition 13• would not be applicable to the Diatrict, and therefore, the -amount- to be levied as a :. flat rate can be established by the Board of Directors •as that which is necessary to ,fund the budget without concern to receiving 'a proportionate allocation out of the one =. ..percent tax levy that -will be made by the •County Board.. - * ..of Supervisors. ..: • :. As indicated previously, if tither a flat rate or rate based .upon the ad -valorem of real property is con- sidered to• be ':a. tax" ,- it •could not be levied in' an amount beyond 'that .which. is authorized per allocation by action of the. Bo.ard:.of Supervisors •from the total tax rate levy : p+er.Mitted `by ..proposition 13. • - • - ~'• :It is =m --further a inifln. :tihat •-in.. oint of fact the y p P , - • establishment . of 'a :flat rate* .'pecial,5ervice charge, constitutes �a "user charge", whiich beyond the legal 'distinction' as. set -forth in" the Jane 20 opinion•, appiars to be clearly beyond the scope -of Proposition 13 limitations r. and would be jDermi.ssible for levy in any amount necessary.. .. le - to provide the service:.to the :individual Users a � = . - Thomas Woodruff , �.. General Counsel. TLW. db Report Required By Section 5473 .of the Health and Safety Code COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.0.80%8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �... FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 REPORT RE SEWER SERVICE FEES-- (714)962-2411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PREFACE This report is prepared pursuant to the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 5473. The purpose of said report is to give public notice of the intent of the County Sanitation Districts to consider the adoption of an Ordinance that will prescribe fees and charges for sanitary sewer services provided by the Districts and to be charged to respective parcels of property within the territorial juris- diction of the Districts. This report contains a description of each parcel of real property that will receive the services of the Districts and have access to utilization of the facilities, said parcels of real property being described by reference to maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and on file in the office of the County Assessor, with copies on file in the office of the Clerk of these Districts. Additionally, this report sets forth the amount of the charge for each parcel for fiscal year 1978-79 . The Ordinance under consideration by the governing Board of Directors of these Districts will provide revenues which shall be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sanitary sewer facilities, and shall not be used for the acquisition or construction or mainte- nance of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished from main trunk, interceptor and outfall sewers provided by these Districts. If the proposed Ordinance is adopted, the legislative authority may elect to have such charges for the forthcoming fiscal year collected on the tax roll in the same manner. , by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with. and not separately from, the general taxes of these Districts and the County of Orange. At the time stated in the notice setting the public hearing on this report, the governing Board of Directors shall hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to said report referred to in said notice, and may continue the hearing from time to time. DATED: June 22 , 1978 Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel J Supporting Material for Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service and Immediate Availability Charge ALL DISTRICTS PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 41 ,662,824 25,933,200 (15,729,624) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 61 ,058,000 85,075,000 24,017,000 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 6,817,884 8, 153,000 1 ,335, 116 District Operating & Other Expenditures 7,009,700 8,548,8o0 1 ,539, 100 Distribute Upper Basin Joint Works Equity to other CSD' s 1 , 141 ,000 1 , 141 ,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 116,543,408 128,851 ,000 12,302,592 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 14, 152,000 13,759,000 ( 393,000) Sale of Capacity Rights 660,000 1 ,213,000 553,000 Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 3,858,000 4,236,000 378,000 Interest & Misc. Income 3,629,637 3,517,000 ( 112,637) Other 3,003,000 1 ,500,000 (1 ,503,000) Carry-over 71 ,836,318 87,461 ,000 15,624,682 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 97, 138,955 111 ,636,000 111,547,045 Amount to be raised by Assessment 19,409,453 17, 165,000 ( 2,244,453) 7 J� imated Number of Parcels in the alstrict 400,560 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability I,$42.85 ,per parcel (Average) 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. (ALL) PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $ 87,461 ,000 $ 76,830,000 $70,277,000 $60,969,000 $39,335,000 �fi1 j REVENUE Assessment at $ /parcel 17,165,000 17,165,000 17,165,000 17,165,000 17,165,000 Other Revenue Federal S State Participation 13,759,000 18,749,000 30,583,000 36,063,000 29,563,000 179''7 Loan in Aid of Construction 1 ,150.000 Sale of Capacity Rights 1 ,213,000 73,000 73,000 73,000 73,000 Fees 4,236,000 3,697,000 3,491 ,000 3,232,000 2,857,000 /7.� Miscellaneous 3,867,000 3,066,000 2,798,000 2,435,000 1 557 000 i3-77 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $128,851 ,000 $119,580,000 $124,387,000 $119,937,o0U $90,550,000 �,;� EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 10 868 o00 $ 5,577,000 4 054 000 6,163,000 2 , $ , $ $ >999,000 7 Share of Joint Works Construction 29,639,000 30,1134,000 43,048,Oo0 50,618,0o0 38,213,000 1111.0 Repay Loan in Aid of Construction 200,000 ZOU,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1.0 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 1 ,141 ,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 335,000 Share of Joint Operating 8,151 ,000 10,667,000 13,343,000 20,448,000 26,118,000 ?� District Operating & Other Expenditures 2,022,000 2,325,000 2,673,000 3,073,000 3,533,000 /3. 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES _$ 52,021 ,000 $ 49,303,000 $63,418,000 $8o,602,000 $71 ,398,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 76,830,000 $ 70,277,000 $ 60,969,Oo0 $39,335,000 $19,152,000 1� 'I Funds Necessary to Meet Cor-mitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments z4,653,000 32,210,000 40,303,000 35,700,000 35,700,000 =>r� Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 52 177 000 $ 38,06 00 $ 20,66b000 S z10— .�.,� 3,635,000 ($1b,548,000)1�w l DISTRICT N0, 1 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 900,000 638,000 (202,000) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 6,566,564 7,075,000 508,436 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 789,511 924,000 134,489 District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves 607,450 747,000 139,550 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 8,863,525 9,384,ODD 520,475 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 1 ,234,000 1 ,249,000 15,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 32,000 154,000 122,000 Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 234,000 244,000 10,000 Interest & Misc. Income 410,300 352,000 ( 58,300) Carry-over 5,656,452 6,026,000 369,548 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 7,566,752 8,025,000 458,248 Amount to be raised by Assessment 1 ,296,773 1 ,359,000 62,227 Estimated Number of Parcels in the strict 34,.155 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service immediate availability 39.79 r t 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING S CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-73 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 73-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $6,026,000 $5,599,000 $5,086,000 $4,150,000 $2,168,000 REVENUE Assessment at $39.79/parcel 1 ,359,000 1 ,359,000 1 ,359,000 1 ,359,000 1 ,359,000 Other Revenue Federal r State Participation 1 ,249,000 1 ,704,00o 2,780,000 3,278,000 2,687,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 154,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Fees 244,000 26o,o00 279,000 302,000 302,000 Miscellaneous 352,000 323,000 295,000 239,000 127,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 9,384,000 $9,252,000 $9,806,000 $9,335,000 $6,650,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Share of Joint Works Construction 2,694,000 2,767,000 3,913,000 4,601 ,000 3,474,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury -0- 9,000 9,000 9,000 30,000 Share of Joint Operating 924,000 1 ,209,000 1 ,512,000 2,317,000 21959,000 District Operating E Other Expenditures 92,000 106,000 122,000 140,000 161 ,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 3,785,000 $4,166,000 $5,656,000 $7,167,000 $6,724,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 5,599,000 $5,086,000 $4,150,000 $2,168,000 $ (74,000) Funds Necessary to Meet Cor,mitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 2,083,000 2,828,000 3,584,Oo0 3,362,000 3,362,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 3,516,000 $2,258,000 $ 566,000 ($1 ,l94,000) (53,436,000) l ( l DISTRICT N0, ? PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SE'WF R SERVICE & IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 10,710,993 5,799,000 (4,911 ,993) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 22,474,534 28,005,000 5,530,466 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 2, 123,089 2,625,000 501 ,911 District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves 1 ,781 ,000 2,261 ,000 480,000 distribute Upper Basin Joint Works 1 141 000 1 141 00o Equity to other CSD`s ' ' TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 37,089,616 39,831 ,000 2,741 ,384 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 4,356,000 4, 114,000 ( 242,000) Sale of Capacity Rights 455,000 22,000 ( 433,000) Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 1 ,580,000 1 ,530,000 ( 50,000) Interest & Misc. Income 1 ,024,000 1 ,089,000 65,000 Carry-over 24,425,236 28,588,000 4, 162,764 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 31 ,840,236 35,343,000 3,502,764 Amount to be raised by Assessment 5,249,380 41488,000 ( 761 ,380) `imated Number of Parcels in the strict 113,610 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability 39.50 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $28,588,000 $24,751 ,000 $24,125,000 $21 ,820,000 $16,144,000 REVENUE Assessment at $39.50/parcel 4,488,000 4,488,000 4,488,0o0 4,488,000 4,488,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 4,114,000 5,591 ,000 9,120,000 10,754,OD0 8,816,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Fees 1 ,530,000 1 ,400,000 1 ,300,000 1 ,200,000 1 ,000,000 Miscellaneous 1 ,089,000 936,Ooo 514,000 827,000 6o9,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $39 831 000 $37,188 000 $39,969,000 $39,111 ,000 $31 ,079,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 2,108,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 700,000 $ 200,000 Share of Joint works Construction 8,838,000 9,075,000 12,837,000 15,094,000 11 ,395,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 1 ,141 ,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 100,000 Share of Joint Operating 2,625,000 3,435,000 4,256,000 6,584,0o0 8,410,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 368,0o0 423,000 486,0oo 559,000 643,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 15,080,000 $ 135063,000 $18,149,000 $22,967,000 $20,748,o00 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 24,751 ,000 $24,125,000 $21 ,820,000 $16,144,000 $10,331 ,000 Funds Necessary to Meet _ Cornitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 6,532,000 9,074,000 11 ,484,000 10,374,000 10,374,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 18,219,000 $ 15,051 ,000 $ 10,336,000 $ 5,770,000 ($ 43,000) DISTRICT N0, 3 PRELI[IINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & INH EDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 15,720,559 9,389,400 (6,331 , 159) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 14,935,524 25,939,000 11 ,003,476 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 2,192,631 2,587,000 394,369 District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves 2,077,600 2,483,600 4o6,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 34,926,314 40,399,000 5,472,686 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 4,775,000 4,546,000 ( 229,000) Sale of Capacity Rights 75,000 561 ,000 486,000 Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 1 ,243,000 1 ,370,000 127,000 Interest & Misc. Income 1 , 119,225 1 ,076,000 ( 43,225) Carry-over 20,422, 189 26, 127,000 5,704,811 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 27,634,414 3316801000 6,045,586 Amount to be raised by Assessment 7,291 ,900 6,719,000 ( 572,900) F `imated Number of Parcels in the _.strict 156,555 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability 42.92 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $26,127,000 $21 ,247,000 $20,460,000 $18,382,000 $12,816,000 REVENUE Assessment at $42.92/parcel 6,719,000 6,719,000 6,719,000 6,719,000 6,719,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 4,546,Oo0 6,201 ,000 lo,I14,000 11 ,927,000 9,777,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 561 ,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 Fees 1 ,370,000 1 ,200,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,000,000 900,000 Miscellaneous 1 ,076,000 871 ,000 839,OCO 753,000 527,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $4o,399,000 $36,262,000 $39,256,000 $38,8o5,000 $30,763,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 6,258,000 $ 1 ,740,000 $ 1 ,703,000 $ 1 ,960,000 $ 100,000 Sharda of Joint Works Construction 9,802,000 10,064,0o0 14,236,000 16,740,000 12,637,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury -0- 33,000 33,000 33,000 111 ,000 Share of Joint Operating 2,587,000 3,384,000 4,234,000 6,488,000 8,287,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 505,000 581 ,000 668,000 768,000 883,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 19,152,000 $ 15,802,000 $20,874,000 $25,989,000 $22,018,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 21 ,247,000 $20,460,O n $18,382,000 $12,816,000 $ 8,745,000 Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 7,901 ,000 10,1137,000 12,995,000 11 ,009,000 11 ,009,000 -und Balance or (Deficit) $ 13,34b On $ 1D 02 000 $ 5,387,000 $ 1 ,807,000 ($ 2,264,000) DISTRICT NO, 5 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & IP111IEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 3,605,945 2,170,000 (1 ,435,945) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 4,732,950 6,560,000 1 ,827,050 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 396,801 462,000 65, 199 District Operating '& Other Expenditures & Reserves 719,000 828,000 109,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 9,454,696 10,020,000 565,304 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants g14,000 940,000 26,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 24,000 116,000 92,000 Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 142,000 50,000 ( 92,000) Interest & Misc. Income 233,000 237,000 4,000 Loan in aid of Construction 1 ,150,000 1 ,150,000 Carry-over 5,520,764 6,371 ,000 850,236 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 7,983,764 8,864,000 880,236 Amount to be raised by Assessment 1 ,470,932 11156,000 ( 314,932) r imated Number of Parcels in the s,strict 19,365 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability 59.70 t 'f 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $ 6,371 ,000 $6,562,000 $5,160,000 $3,797,000 $1 ,917,00- REVENUE Assessment at $59.70/parcel 1 ,156,000 1 ,156,000 1 ,156,000 1 ,156,000 1 ,156,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 940,000 1 ,282,000 2,092,000 2,467,000 2,022,000 Loans In Aid of Construction 1 ,150,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 116,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fees 50,000 50,000 50,000 40,000 40,000 Miscellaneous 237,000 241 ,000 190,000 140,000 71 ,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $10,020,000 $9,296,000 $8,653,000 $7,t05,000 $5,211 ,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 450,000 $ 875,000 $ 525,000 $ 375,000 $ 75,000 Share of Joint Works Construction & Equity 2,027,000 2,082,000 2,945,000 3,462,000 2,614,OOD Repay Loan in Aid of Construction 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 7,000 7,000 7,000 23,000 Share of Joint Operating 462,000 605,000 757,000 1 ,159,000 1 ,481 ,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 319,000 367,000 422,000 485,000 557,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $`'3,458,000 $4,136,000 $4,856,000 $5,688,000 $4,950,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 6,562,000 $5,160,000 $3,797,000 $1 ,917,000 $ 261 ,000 Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 2,068,000 2,428,000 2,844,000 2,475,400 2,475,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 4,494,000 $2,732,000 $ 953,000 ($ 558,000) ($2,214,000) DISTRICT N0, 6 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating ✓; Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 967,000 305,000 (662,00i�) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 3, 168, 114 4, 111 ,0o0 942,886 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 419,300 492,000 72,700 District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves 394,800 477,000 82,200 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,949,214 5,385,000 435,786 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 792,000 802,000 10,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 20,000 99,000 79,000 Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 35,000 40,000 5,000 Interest & Misc. Income 147,700 150,000 2,300 Carry-over 3, 106,445 3,424,000 317,555 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 4, 101 , 145 4,515,000 413,855 Amount to be raised by Assessment 848,069 870,000 21 ,931 imated Number of Parcels in the M strict 211795 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability 39.92 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 6 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $3,424,000 $3,012,000 $2,614,OOD $1 ,979,000 ($ 21 ,000) REVENUE Assessment at $39.92/parcel 870,000 870,000 870,000 870,000 '870,000 Other Revenue Federal E State Participation 802,000 1 ,095,000 1 ,786,000 2,106,000 1 ,726,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 99,000 4,000 4,000 4,o00 4,000 Fees 40,0o0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,0o0 Miscellaneous 150,000 131 ,000 114,00o 85,000 -0- TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $5,385,000 $5,152,000 $5,428,000 $5,84 o00 $2,619,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 795,000 $ 525,000 Share of Joint Works Construction 1 ,731 ,000 1 ,777,000 2,514,000 2,956,000 2,231 ,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 6,000 6,000 6,000 20,000 Share of Joint Operating 491 ,000 643,000 804,040 1 ,233,000 1 ,575 M O District Operating s Other Expenditures 76,000 87,000 100,000 115,000 132,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,373,000 $2,538,000 $3,449,000 $5,105 000 $4 483 000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $3,012,000 $2,614,000 $1 ,979,000 ($ 21 ,000) ($1 ,864,000) Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 1 269mo 2,225.000 2,242,000 2 242 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $1 ,743,000 $ 389,000 (S 574.o00) ($2,263,000) ($4,106,000) DISTRICT NO , 7 PRELIHIINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSNENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 4,492,327 3, 170,800 (1 ,321 ,527) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 5,937,058 8,022,000 2,084,942 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 444,526 526,000 81 ,474 District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves ' 806,050 985,200 179, 150 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 11 ,679,961 12,704,000 1 ,024,039 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 1 , 147,000 1 , 161 ,000 14,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 30,000 144,000 114,00o Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 384,000 405,000 21 ,000 Interest & Misc. Income 312,612 332,000 19,388 Due from Cities 1 ,853,000 350,000 (1 ,503,000) Carry-over 6,345,668 9,280,000 2,934,332 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 10,072,280 11 ,672,000 1 ,599,720 Amount to be raised by Assessment 1 ,607,681 1 ,032,000 ( 575,681 ) F imated Number of Parcels in the .strict 27,075 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability 38. 12 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING S CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $9,280,000 $8,777,000 $7,842,000 $6,406,000 $4,596,0o0 REVENUE Assessment at $38.12/parcel 1 ,032,000 1 ,032,000 1 ,032,000 1 ,032,000 1 ,032,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 1 ,161 ,000 1 ,584,000 2,584,000 3,047,000 2,498,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 144,000 6,Ooo 6,000 6,000 6,000 Fees 405,000 350,000 325,000 300,000 275,000 Miscellaneous 682,000 312,000 278,000 229,000 162,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $12,7o4,000 $12,061 ,000 $12,067,000 $11 ,020,000 $8,569,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 496,0oo $ 490,0o0 $ 625,000 $ 210,000 $ 185,000 Share of Joint works Construction 2,505,000 2,572,000 3,637,000 4,277,000 3,229,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 8,000 8,000 8,000 23,000 Share of Joint Operating 525,000 688,000 861 ,OOo 1 ,319,000 1 ,685,000 District Operating S Other Expenditures 401 ,000 461 ,000 530,000 610,000 702,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,927,000 $4,219,000 $5,661 ,000 $6,424,000 $5,829,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $8,777,000 $7,842,000 $6,406,0o0 $4,596,00o $2,740,000 Funds Necessary to Meet . Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 2,110,000 2,831 ,000 3,212-000 _ 2,515.000 2,915,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $6,667,000 $5,011 ,000 S3J 94,000 S1 .681 ,OGG (S 17L OOO) l DISTRICT NO, 11 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE & IMIMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Increase 77-78 78-79 (Decrease) Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves 5,266,000 4,461 ,Oo0 ( 805,000) Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves 3,243,256 5,363,000 2 , 119,744 Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense 452,026 537,000 84,974 District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves 623,800 767,000 143 ,200 ,r TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 9,585,082 11 , 128,000 1 ,542,918 Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants 934,000 947,000 13,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 24,000 117,000 93,000 Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges 240,000 597,000 357,000* Interest & Misc. Income 382,800** 281 ,000 (101 ,800) Carry-Over 6,359,564 7,645,000 1 ,285,436 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 7,940,364 9,587,000 1 ,646,636 . Amount to be raised by Assessment 1 ,644,718 1 ,541 ,000 ( 103,718) *Includes 1,977-78 fees not remitted by City . **Includes $141M Equity Sale in 77-78; -0- in 78-79 ` stlmated Number of Parcels in the District 28,005 Estimated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immediate availability 55.03 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, ii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING S CAPITAL OiILY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $7,645,Oo0 $6,882,000 $4,99o,o00 $4,435,000 $ 1 ,715,001) REVENUE Assessment at $55.03/parcel 1 ,541 ,000 1 ,541 ,000 1 ,541 ,000 1 ,541 ,000 1 ,541 ,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 947,000 1 ,292,000 2,107,000 2,484,000 2,037,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 117,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fees 597,000 397,000 397,000 350,000 300,000 Miscellaneous 281 ,000 252,000 168,000 162,000 61 ,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $11 ,128,000 $10,369,000 $9,208,000 $8,977,000 $ 5,659,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 1 ,406,000 $2,272,000 $ 576,000 $2,023,000 $ 1 ,814,000 Share of Joint Works Construction 2,042,000 2,097,000 2,966,000 3,488,000 2,633,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 7,000 7,000 7,000 23,000 Share of Joint Operating 537,000 703,000 879,000 1 ,348,000 1 ,721 ,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 261 ,000 300,000 345,000 396,0o0 455,o0D TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,246,000 $5,379,000 $4,773,000 $7,262,000 $ 6,646,o00 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $6,882,000 $4,990,000 $4,435,000 $1 ,715,000 ($ 987,000) Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 2,690,Ooo 2,387,000 3,631 ,000 3,323,000 3,323,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $4,192,000 $2,603,000 $ 804,000 ($1 ,608,000) ($ 4,310,000) June 14. 1978 P I % ESTIMATED OPERATING/CAPITAL USER CHARGE TO PROVIDE 1978-79 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS - C., F� �1 ( ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1978-79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE 1978-79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE FINANCING BASED ON 1977-78 FINAIICIIIG BASED ON RECOMMENDED FUNDING LEVEL JOINT WORKS REDUCTION IN CHARGE TO PROPERTY C6'4ER l IF DISTS DO RECEIVE PRO-RATA SHARE OF AMOUNT TO BE MAXIMUM OPER/ TAXES UNDER JARVIS MAXIMUM OPER/ RAISED BY OPER/ CAPITAL USER CAPITAL USER CAPITAL USER 1917-78 TAX FUNDING LEVEL CHARGE IF DISTS ) AMOUNT TO BE CHARGE IF DISTS CHARGE IF LISTS RECEIVE NO PRO- RAISED BY RECOMMENDED RECEIVED NO PRO- P.ECEIVE RATA SHARE OF OPER/CAPITAL JOINT WORKS RATA SHARE OF SHAPE CF TAXES ESTIMATED NUMBER TOTAL TAX OPER/CAPITAL TAXES UNDER JARVIS MAXIMUM OPER/ USER CHARGE TAX LEVY TAXES UNDER JARVIS LIJ;ER DISTRICT OF PARCELS LEVY DEBT SERVICE (1) - (2) (1) - (2) CAPITAL TAX LEVY (4) - (5) REDUCTION (3) - (7) (3) - (5) - (7) 1 $1,382,548 $ 85,775 $ 1,296,773 $ 1,296.773 $ 505,781 $ 790.992 $ 142,437 $ 1.154.336 S 648.555 2 5.729,496 480,116 5,249,380 5,249,380 1,907,846 3,341.534 388,407 4,860.973 2.953.127 3 7.970.515 678,615 7.291.900 7,291.900 2,524,808 4,767.092 572.085 6,719,815 4,195.C31 5 1.497,464 26,532 1,470,932 1,470,932 579,860 891,072 106,664 1,364,268 784..,C9 6 879,992 31,923 848,069 848,069 330,324 517,745 103.377 744.692 414.368 7 2.238,815 631,134 1.607,681 1,607,681 654,780 952,901 156.938 1,450,743 795.563 11 1,729.839 85,121 1,644,718 1,644,718 510,039 1,134,679 103,407 1.541.311 1,031.272 TOTAL $21,428,669 $2,019,216 $19.409.453 $19,409,453 $7,013,438 $12,396.015 $1.573.315 $17,836,138 $10,822,700 OPERATING CAPITAL USER CHARGE PER PARCEL - 1 34,155 $ 37.97 $ 23.16 $ 33.80 $ 18.99 2 113.610 46.21 29.41 42.79 25.93 3 156.555 46.58 30.45 42.92 26.80 5 19.365 75.96 46.01 70.45 40.5 6 21.795 38.91 23.76 34.17 19.01 7 27,075 59.38 35.19 53.58 29.40 It 28,005 58.73 40.52 55.04 36.82 AVERAGE 400,560 $ 48.46 $ 30.95 $ 44.53 $ 27.02 --Fr ._4k;RDI"TONAL INFORMATION CALL FRED 11,g% '.FR OR 14AYNE SYLVESTER COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS TELEPHONE 540-2910 of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE � FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 July 6, 1978 (714)s40.2910 10:00 a.m. (714)962.2411 PRESS RELEASE PUBLIC HEARING JULY 19, 1978 - 6:00 P.M. RE PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH AND COLLECT FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SEWER SERVICE AND IMMEDIATE t.VAILABILITY ON TAX ROLL In the past, the Sanitation Districts have received the bulk of their revenues from a special assessment for sewer service against all real property and improvements in the Districts based on the ad valorem property rolls of the County. The cost to the average homeowner, depending on the District, for sewer service exclusive of maintenance of local sewers has been $3 to $5 per month and has been collected via the County tax bill. With the passage of the Jarvis/Gann Initiative (Proposition 13) , the question arises: Does this provision prohibit the Districts from levying the charges that have been levied in all prior years? While the Dis- tricts' General Counsel has submitted the attached legal opinion advising that the Districts are not barred from levying a charge for services based on the ad valorem assessment roll of the County, no clear-cut decision has been received from the State or County. Because of this uncertainty, the Boards of Directors of the Sanitation Districts are considering a flat rate special assessment on each parcel this year to insure that adequate funds are available to continue the construction and operation of the Districts ' facilities. It is proposed that the flat rate special assessments will be col- lected on the County tax roll, rather than by direct billing pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 5473.1. The sewer service costs to the average homeowner utilizing the flat rate special . '0816`- assessment are essentially the same as those previously based on the ad valorem assessment roll. However, owners of properties with low assessed valuations will find the proposed flat rate assessments slightly higher than the charges paid this past year, while the owners of property with high assessed valuations will experience a reduction in their costs for sewer service. U MABRA 78/79 User Char a Financing Based on Recomended 12.2 Million Reduction NORBA in Charges to Property Owners Lr04 PLAM Less Possible Pro Rata Share of Allowable Tax 4- Proposed User Charge Collections Q" WX a M 2 Dist. #1 39.79. • 14.81_ 24.98 CYFRESS vsLtA STan MN Dist. #2 39.50 16.80 22.70 3 OS CNANM Dist. #3 42.92 16.13 26.79 XAMMS w ,N5rEFt TUSTN Dist.' #5 59.70 29.95 29.75 OA� SAM 7 Dist. #6 39.92 15.15 24.77 arw . \ � Dist. #7 38.12 24.19 13.93 F"auty w• Dist.#ll 55.03 18.21 36.82 COSTA IFt ME \� MESA, 6 5 NEWGrjr•T SEAC" If the Sanitation Districts receive their proportionate share of the allowable tax collections , the proposed flat rate special assess- ments for each property will be reduced as much as 40%. The Boards of Directors have always been mindful of costs and the distribution of same. The Districts' long-range planning and budgeting program has paid off for the property owner. In spite of -2- - - :. increased demands for sewer 41 service and additional facilities 4o required by higher State and 39 38 Federal environmental standards , 37 the combined average annual x 36 variable ad valorem special assess- or 35 ment rate has steadily declined . 34 from 42�_/$100 assessed valuation 33 32 in 72/73 to 31(,%/$100 assessed 31 ! __j valuation in 77/78. The Dis- 73 711 75 76 77 77 � tricts ' Boards of Directors have ?SF 7A7R I S 10A L � E VARIABLE RATE AD VALOREM reduced the budget requirements SPECIAL ASSESSMENT to lighten the property owners ' burden by* $2.2 million for this fiscal year, 78/79. The Directors are on record as favoring continuing the variable rate ad valorem special assessment rather than the proposed flat rate assessment because it is more equitable and less expensive to administer. However; if the necessary legal decisions to permit the continued use of the variable assessment charge are not forthcoming by August loth, the final date for submission of the flat rate assessment charges to the County Auditor, it appears the Directors will proceed with the flat rate assessment to insure that adequate funds are available. The Districts ' . proposed flat rate -charges are considerably less • than those for- most other locales. In many cases throughout the country, sewer use charges range from 1/2 to more than double the monthly water bill. -3- Y• The indebtedness is about 3% of the Districts ' expenditures . If the proposed flat rate special assessment goes into effect, funds for bond debt will be collected separately on the tax bill based on the Assessor' s valuations for land and improvements only. If the flat rate special assessment procedure becomes a fact and is continued in subsequent years , the Districts will proceed with a planned sewer use revenue program to become effective July 1, 1979, which will take into account the actual use of the Districts' sewerage facilities . In all probability, the individual homeowners ' 79/80 flat rate assessment in that case will be less than this year' s charge. The Sanitation Districts operate the third largest wastewater (sewage) treatment system on the West Coast. The capital costs of present day facilities are $229 million; additional construction required during the next 8 years will double this figure. The . _ Districts collect, treat, and dispose of wastewater from 408,000 residential , commercial and industrial connections serving 1.5 million citizens in the 23 cities in the Orange County metropolitan area. Annual revenues come from variable rate ad valorem special assessments , connection fees , industrial use. fees , annexation charges and State and Federal construction grants . The annual expenditures break down approximately 10% for operations and maintenance, 87% for current and planned treatment plant and trunk sewer construction, 3% for bonded debt retirement. -, The Boards of Directors of the seven Sanitation Districts will hold a public hearing July 19th, 6:00 p.m. , at the Districts ' office, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 on a proposed -flat--rate special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be collected by the County Tax Collector on this year's tax bill for each property parcel in lieu of the variable rate ad valorem special assessment. Notices have been mailed to all property owners of record on the 77/78 assessment rolls . The Sanitation Districts ' staff is standing by to answer property owner questions as to the proposed flat rate special assessments , -^ telephone 540-2910, Extension 5 , Mondays through Fridays - 7 :30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. C4 The REGISTER _: , : _ Mon., June 26,•1 978 = vOu9c4EE[ i • r. — 4E eSo�oE o i SPA AboutFa' e The'National Environmental Pro- mental agency backed down and lectibn'Agency (EPA) and environ- . scrapped its plan. mental activists who spur it on, are At present the EPA is trying to finding some of their tactics can'be farce Los Angeles to stop•pumping Wed against them. This agency.and sewage'sludge five miles off shore .its.fanatical fans have had about-ev- into a submarine canyon.The agency erything their own way for.quite'somewants the'city to build treatment time. plants and-put the sludge in landfills- -If they could not stop a needed ener- at a cost over$250 million.The foun- gy industry by forthright means,they dation is fighting this one and says the often successfully tied the project up EPA•demand will cause. geological in court until it became too expensive •damage, add heavy traffic and in- to pursue. And, this tactic has now crease air pollution. been turned against them in enough The law firm cites EPA's own study .areas to give them pause to reflect. which has shown that ocean•use has _ -.A business-backed law firm.Pacific had little.adverse effect*on marine Legal Foundation in Sacramento•won. ecology.Demanding an impact state- g suit in 1973 agaiizst EPA by charging ment. the foundation is putting the it had violated environmental%laws agency•on the ropes• by the same when.it refused to permit the use of tactics often employed'by EPA and DDT against the tussock moth. The environmentalists. risks involved in using the insecticide. If the environmentalists lose this the foundation said. were negligible one it would surely have an adverse compared to the*environmental dam- effect on the EPA's drive to force age done by the moth larvae. It was' secondary treatment throughout the shown that 700.million board feet of nation. timber had.been lost. We:are pleased to see the idea sur- .The agency granted a DDT permit •face that people are also part of the in 1974. environment. Air, water.,plant and 'Transportation' planners .in Los wildlife need consideration. but peo- Angeles tried to-force drivers to pool pie v�ere alsohave primary needs.ced n this planet and and ride buses by setting aside one However,it should not be necessary lane on a busy freeway for the exclu- to continue.to turn the tactics back sive ruse of car-pools and buses. This over-zealous agencies. This in angered drivers and caused accidents upon g and congestion. - itself can add injury to the economic environment for people. .The foundation filed suit claiming Although these incidents may tend Othat the congestion increased air pol- to show inconsistencies of govern- Jution and damaged the human•envi- ment regulators and help to keep ronment by the increased hazards.An them in check.the only real cure is to impact statement was demanded and get government and its bureaucracy ` a federal judge agreed.The environ- out of autocratic control. /'ara`1 APFI:'.tL, FRGM PEl'MtT DECISION OF REGIOr1AG ('Cf44I01"3IUPJ r 1 -S'ecL-ion Ac:)ellant . 3 1. ;Name, address and telephone number of appellant: Amir_os de Mina Qhi ca 170U Courtney Lane - Huntington r Iiuntin ton ileac 6 - Zip (Area Code)(Telephone No. 1 L 2. Name, address and telephone number of appellant's representative, if any: Y Kenneth and Rhoda Marten i • __ 17041 Courtney Lane (711r, 89h-11437 (office) r �.... F 11untin .ton Beach 926h2 t 1 81 -2 6 (home) Zip Area Code Telephone No. Section II. Decision of Regional Commission Being Appealed 1. Name of Regional Commission: South Coast f 2. Date of Regional Commission's decision:.June 26i 1978 . 3. Regional Commission File Number: P-78-3184 4. Brief description of development being appealed: Reach 1 and 2 of a sewer syster:; sewer pipe is 84-inches in diameter 5. Brief description of development location (city or county, nearest 1 roads, etc.): t italion D' Trpatment Elant d2 (near the Santa Ana River mouth in Huntington Beach) and extends a roxi- mately three miles to Lake Street in Huntington Beach. 6. Describe decision of the Regional Commission (e.g. approval, denial, approval with conditions, etc.): 7 to 5 vote to-approve construction of Reach 1 and 2 contr M to Coastal staff recommendation Section III. Identification and Notifiaation of Other Interested Parties t 1. State the names and addresses of the following parties. Use additional { paper if necessary: a. The name and address of the permit applicant: CountZ Sanitation Di r' 1.1 t ict, . 11 of Orange QoUgty P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley 92708 b. The governing body of each county, city and other local government agencies having jurisdiction of the project area: 11Wtinpton Beach City Council Board of 3u2ervisors of uranae,County c. Names and addresses of all persons who expressed support or opposition s to the development and provided their names and addresses to the s Regional Commission or are otherwise known by the appellant to have an interest in the matter appealed: Dennis 1•1. Reid Senior Engineer, Sanitation District 140. 11 (address above) _Edward Selich, Planning Director, City of Huntington, Beach. P.O. Box 190 r H P-all, 1107Stregt HooM J119, Sacran,ento 25814i x • k M 'T' EEE =J-1STED BY COI,-Mb33ION: G i Appeal 19-1c. Date Piled: • -2- , r i 4 Section IV. Statement of Facts to Demonstrate 7tibstantial Issue ` The appellant must demonstrate to the State Ce;ranio3ion that a substantial izs�:e is raised ty the appeal, an issue of such concern that it warrants 3 new hearing r of the application by the Commission. The a �' ' ppellant s allure to set for�ch in sufficient detail the• facts uDon which the appeal is based, and the reasons the ' appellant believes the decision of the Regional Commission to be inconsistent wj n the requirements of the Coastal Act, may result in rejection of the appeal on grounds that the presence of a substantial issue has not been demonstrated. Di.tt to the short deadlines provided in the Coastal Act review of � your appeal will not y be possible unless a complete and fully-substantiated appeal is submitted at thi3 time. Check applicable reason(s) why you believe the State Commission should hear the appeal. (In general the Commission has not found that an appeal ' p. present; a substantial issue that warrants hearing unless one of "Core following factors is t present.) w t �x 1. The development presents a stateWLde planning issue on which guidance f of the State Commission is required and the smatter is of statewide significance. c 2. The decision of the Regional Commission adversely affects coastal resources or the proper public use of resources, contrary to specific provisions i of the Coastal Act of 1976. x � 3. The decision of the Regional Commission is inconsistent with previous I a decisions of the State Commission or did not adequately address issues covered by the interpretive guidelines adopted by the State Commission. 4. The proceedings of the Regional Commission were materially affected ti by inaccurate factual information or procedural error and therefore resulted in a decision contrary to the policies of the Coastal Act of 1976. 5. The decision of the Regional Commission should be changed because of r _ new factual information, relating to coastal issues, andthis information could 0 13 � not reasonably have been presented to the Regional Commission. 6. Other (Specify in detail) I t i Attach a complete , concise statement of facts substantiating the alleged reasons warranting hearing of the appeal by the State Commission and reversal or modifi- cati onof the decision of the Regional Commission. f 4 Section V. Certification I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I understand that any misstatement or omission of the information requested may be grounds for rejection of this appeal. f DATED July 5. 1978 Signature of ap el an r represen i,e { f i T Rev Lsed 2/17/77 Appeal of P--78-3184 Amigos de Bolsa Chica The construction of this 84-inch sewer line is predicated on t Signal Landmark's development plans for the northern Bolsa Chica bluffs, for their marina community -in the Bolsa Chica lowlands, and the Huntington Beach Company's development plans for the southeastern bluffs of Bolsa Chica. The future uses in the Bolsa Chica area have not been determined. In fact, the County of Orange and the City of Huntington B each are currently involved in the preparation of a Local Coastal Plan. Politi- cally, the citizens of Huntington Beach have indicated strongly that they do not want a marina community in the lowlands of Bolsa Chica. To construct such a large setter pipe would invite intense develop- ment in Huntington Beach and the Bolsa Chica area. The Bolsa Chica area is an environmentally sensitive area and needs protection from urban development. Less than 10% of California coastal wetlands remain. At the South Coast Regional Commission hearing on June 26, 1978 the District Engineer of County Sanitation District No. 11 said that 10% of the sewer trunk system is allocated for development in the Bolsa Chica. He further stated that if development did not take place in the Bolsa Chica, the size of the pipe could only be reduced from 84 inches to 81 or 82 inches. Could this statement be evaluated by a competent engineer to verify its technical accuracy? Reach 1 and 2 should not be approved until the local coastal programs have determined the uses in the Bolsa Chica lowlands and both blu€fs. It is highly likely that the size of the pipes for Reach 1 and 2 should be greatly reduced in size--say to a 4--foot pipe. The Planning Director of the City of Huntington Beach said in his testimony to the South Coast ' -_- Pae e 2 ' Appeal of P-78-3184 Amigos de Bolsa Chica Regional Commission on June 26 1978 "The ro p petty within the coastal area does not need this trunk sewer as there is sufficient capacity for future development." Based on all previous experience, approving the larger pipe will encourage development in the Bolsa Chica area. 0�: l d 0 l 1(1(' 8L. r • �.�, (1iili•Q ►1_ uroeV! ►jan lX•.:nclsco, UA y�r1U5 I}�/fJ /�"•V�'UU • f!I-:T•t rr+r.. ?FF.. j..M♦••••/n EHE • 0-7 1 ..�•"•�n�1( .i.....Tr-.r.•T w i 41 Sectioh 1. Acoei.l3rt ' ,•�►, 1.' N me, addre33 and telephone number of appellant: 'Lip (Ared Code)kielaphone !Ia. 2. Name, a dress and telephone number of appellant's representative, if Any: •• Zip Area Code Telephone No. Section IT. Decision of Re c i o:�al Cc nission ?ein �unealed -- - 1. Name of Red onal Co fission: ,• '� ► .�� ,�..:.:� � 2. Daze of Reelonzl Co=i'ssion's decision: �' j ' j. Regional Ccarmission -File N=ber: �'� /� . I 4. Brief description of development being appealed: � i 5. Brief description of development location (city or county, nearest � tY . roads, etc.): �..�.� , ?,LA.,,e ��,�,,, �/7 + ate f i J ,, 3M•1yf" , ,✓-.. J Y -��,. �C-01 6 Les^�be da.. oces 32.^T' of tAhe ReT�rzl Cam^-;-- ssic3 (e.6. approval, der•i.a3, Q .. • approval with conditions, etc.): ' Section III. Identification and N;otifieatior of Other interested parties •1. State the names and addresses of the following parties. Use additional. paper if necessaiy: a. The name and address of the pprmi.t applicant: 421 &LIP - b. The governing body of each count;, Ycity and Cher local goveriment - agencies having jurisdiction of the project area: WWI c. Names and addresses of all persons who expressed support or opposition to the deve?er-rent and provided their nacres and addresses to the ..Regional Cct=ission or are othercrise knowrn by the appellant to have ~� an interest in the matter appealed: - • 1 TO BE CCM?`LUED BY CC,%X1SSJO!J: - ( • I Appeal 140. Date Filed: ON • • Section r/ . Vtr7�•_�7r.r Cam, rL�! �i� r�:.�•.:.��J-•�•�Lp ��i C.'i.��...:a= •~♦. ' .t • • •y Ts. �►, The appellant ui=t do-rns trate to the State Cezr_ii-sic^ that a subs tantial iZzue is raised b1 the appeal, ar. issue of sz.:ch concern that it warrants a new hearing of't::e application by the Cc=i33ion. The appellant's fail-are to set forth is sufficient detail the facta upon which the appeal is based, acid the reason3 the appellant believes the decision of the Regional Ccmission to be inconsis r- tent •frith the reo•.:ir=,ants of ':he Coastal Pict, may result in rejection of the appeal on grounds that the presence of a substantial issue has not been dernor.3trated. Lie to the short deadlines provided in the Coastal Act, review of your appeal will not be possible unless a cormplete and fully-substantiated appeal is submitted at this time. • Checks applicable reason(s) why you beli e;a the State Comr:ri33ion should hear the appeal. (In 6eneral, the Cormaission has not found that an appeal presents a substantial issue that warrants hearing '�one of "t • unless one following factors i3 present.) . 1. The develo=ent presents a'state*r:ide planning issue on,which guidance of the State Co�issi on is required and the scatter is of statewide significance. • . 2. The decision of the Regional Cormiission adversely affects coastal resources or the proper public use of resources, contrary- to, specific provisions of the Coastal Act of 1976. 3. The decision of the Regiora...l. Cewml ssion is inconsistent frith previous .decisions of the State Comission or did not adequately address issu:,s covered by the inter oretive guidelines adcpted by the State Commission, r - i'''-• The proceedings of 'the Regional Commission wee e materially affected cted . by inaccurate fact-lsal information or procedural error and therefore resulted in a decision contra_ to the, a f 9 �„ ., �- - --•-• - '•y a policies o_ th•_ Coastal r,.t o� 1?,5. 5. The decision of the Regional Corrmi.ssi on should be changed because of new factual info=atien, rela ti no to cots sal issues, and this inroru±ati on could not reasonably have been presented to the Regional Co i.ssion: - • - 6. Other (Specify in detail) - . . • ' x Attach a complete , concise statement of facts substantiating the alleged reasons } warranting hearing of the appeal. by the State Corr�ission and reversal cr modif cation of the decision of the Regional Commission* Section V. Certification I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of mY Iiowledge . ;i and I under3tand that any misstatement or omission of the information requLsted + may be grounds for rejection of this appeal.* i DATED r Signature of appellant or representative _ Revised V17177 STAMIENT OF SUTBSTANTIAL ISSUE APPAL P-78 -,318 4 The attached publicity reveals information that this is the first time the South Coast Regional Commission is making an -effort to law- fully fulfill its role as mandated under the Coastal Act of 1976 - Chap. I, Sec. 30006 and Chap. ., Sec, 30339 {a} , This "public right" to "fully participates` in coastal decisions with full "understanding" has been and still is being violated by this Commission in Orange County without any effort at this point and time being made to include "the widest opportunity-" for citizen input, I am indeed that fact since I am widely known by the Commission to be the only public citizen at large showing publicly- an intensive interest in coastal planning, especially in Orange County, and yet I have never been granted such an opportunity by any of the Commissi±oners Thus this permit approval definitely precludes in every way planning options as set forth in SCRC staff is findings which roust work with citizens ' rights . A.10 DAILY PILOT Thursday.June 29. 1978 oast Panel Se-ts ; Nigilt in Z� 'South Coast Regional Commission members soon will begin meetings in the evenings to discuss- Local Work Programs, required of every in-. corporated city or county within the region: These are -plans speIIing out concepts and Priorities to be set for dealing with 'future.com. munity development projects or preservation of natural resources within as pecific area. COAL)IISSION MEMBERS AIEETINC in Huntington Beach R3onday voted 7 to 1 to initiate the everting meetings, which will not require _ quorum of commissioners, since no action will be • taken. .. . .... Commissioner Diane Keiser was the]one dissi- dent. ]formally, these hearings have been held dur- ing the day and some criticism has been leveled at the lack of citizen participation except by special interest groups. "'WE HAVE A PROBLEM with people who _ work days," observed -Commissioner, Margot E. ;Feuer. .... .... .. . ... ......... . .. The evening meetings are expected to be held in Torrance City Council chambers because most- work programs yet to be staged involve Los Angeles County communities. Commissioners meet every other Monday in - Huntington Beach Citv Council chambers to discuss primarily -st session starxs.. Orange County issues, but must be out 5 .p.m.,•.when the City Council study I ' APPEAL FROM PHIMIT DECISION OF REGIONAL coji?.-IISSION Seetio-PPI I: Appellant 1. Name, address and telephone number of appellant: Sierra Club 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 419 Sacramento, California 95814 916 444-9132 Zip Area Code) T'eiephone No. 2. Name, address and telephone number of appellant's representative, if any: Norbert H. Dall, Coastal/Land Use Coordinator same as above Zip (Area Code) telephone iVo. • Section II. Decision of Regional Commission Bein A?pealed ' Name �-' of Regional Commission: South Coast Regional Commission 1. 2. Date of Regional Commission's decision: June 26, 1978 3. Regional Commission File Number: P-78--3184 Three le long, 84 inch 4. Brief description of development being pealed:ap_ mile _ . diameter sewer interceptor line 5. Brief description of development location (city or county, nearest roads, etc.).: Along :the• seaward side of PCH between Lake Street and Sewage Treatment Plant #2 in Huntington Beach 6. Descri be decision of the Regional. Commission (e.g. approval, denial, approval with conditions, etc.): Approval ,with conditions ' Section III. Identification and Notification of Other Interested Parties 1. State the names and addresses of the following parties. Use additional paper if necessary: a. The name and address of the permit applicant: See Attachment 1 b. The governing overnin body of each county, city and other local government agencies having jurisdiction of the project area: See Attachment 1 c. Names and addresses of all persons who expressed support sor o to pposition he to the development and provided their names and address se known by the zppellsnt to have Region- Commission or are other.�i. - an interest in the matter appealed: See Attachment 1. TO BE COKPLETED BY COi�11►USSION: Date Piled:_ Appeal No* • .. ..._ .... - .. \.. .-_ ..n -. .mow..... •.... ..... .. ..�.. . .... .. -r.. - G. J M —2— y Section IV. Statement of Facts to Demonstrate Substantial Issue The appellant must demonstrate to the State Commission that a substantial issue • Ls raised by the appeal, an issue of such concern that it warrants a new hearing of the application by the Commission. The appellant's failure to set forth in sufficient detail the facts upon which the appeal is based, and the reasons the appellant believes the decision of the Regional Commission to be inconsistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act, may result in rejection of the appeal on - .grounds that the presence of a substantial issue has not been demonstrated. Dxe to the short deadlines provided in -the Coastal Act, review of your appeal will not be possible unless a complete and fully-substantiated appeal is submitted at this time. Check applicable reason(s) why you believe the State Commission should hear. the appeal. (In general, the Commission has rot found that an appeal presents a. substantial issue that warrants hearing unless one of she following factors is present.) X 1. The. development presents a statewide planning issue on which guidance of the State Commission is -required and the matter is of statewide significance. X 2. The decision of the Regional Commission adversely affects coastal resources or the proper public use of resources, contrary to specific provisions Hof the Coastal Act of 1976. - 3. The decision of the Regional Commission is inconsistent with previous decisions of the State Commission or did not,adequately..address issues covered by the interpretive guidelines adopted by the State Commission. 4. The proceedings of the Regional Commission were materially affected by inaccurate factual information or procedural error and therefore resulted in 4 a decision contrary to the policies of the Coastal Act of 1976. 5. The decision of the Regional Commission should be changed because of new factual information, relating to coastal issues, ar_d this information could not reasonably have been presented to the Regional Commission. 6. Other (Specify in detail) s Attach a complete, concise statement of facts substantiating the alleged reasons warranting hearing of the appeal by the State Commission and reversal or modifi- cation of the decision of the Regional Commission. C _> i E Section V. Certification I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge _and I understand that any misstatement or omission of the information requested may be groans for rejection of this. apTFeaAr-—_-" - - --� DATED July l0. 1978 ;",Signature of appellant or rep _sentative , • Norbert H. Dall . r ' 4 t l Revised 2/17/?7 s " struu � •♦�Lun rhv=i SIERRA CLUB CALIFORNIA COASTAL TASK FORCE SIERRA CLUB APPEAL OF P-78-3184 (ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #11) THE SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION DECISION IN P-78-3184 ADVERSELY .AFFECTS,COASTAL RESOURCES CONTRARY TO COASTAL ACT SECTIONS 30250, 30254, 306040 AND 30240. THE PROPOSED SEWER TRUNKLINE, CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY AND CUMULATIVELY, PRESENTS AN ISSUE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE ON WHICH THE GUIDANCE; OF THE STATE COASTAL COMMMISSION IS NEEDED. 'The substantial issue raised by this appeal of the South Coast Regional Commission decision concerning application P-78-3184 (Orange County Sanitation District #11) is that the three mile long, 84" inch diameter sewer interceptor line is an integral part of the sewage system and Bolsa Chica annexation program of the City of Huntington Beach and as such will have significant adverse effects on coastal resources. According to the Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan for Sewers, The sewer facilities are proposed for construction in both developed and undeveloped areas of Huntington Beach and along the southeastern portion of the unincorporated Bolsa Chica area. They have been designed to accomodate anticipated grot:th in the City of Huntington Beach, in accordance with the City's existing zoning maps and plans of the Signal Landmark Company for the Bolsa Chica area. (Cited in South Coast Regional Commission Staff Summary and Recommendations, page 3. Emphasis added.) Similarly, the City of Huntington Beach local coastal program issue identi- fication (November 17, 1977) stated, The proposed Master Plan of Sewers, City of Huntington Beach indicates a trunk sewer is proposed for the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway from Brookhurst Street north to Lake Street. Connecting to this portion is the Ocean Avenue trunk and a branch draining northern Huntington Beach through or around Bolsa Chica. These are proposed to serve projected need. (Page 360' emphasis added.) In addition, Orange County Sanitation District Sewer Treatment Plant #2, into which this trunkline will feed, is undergoing expansion to provide 75 million t SIERRA CLUB APPEAL OF P-78-3184 Page 2 gallons per day of treatment capacity. Although the City's issue identification (Page 36) indicates that the discharge will receive secondary treatment, oral testimony by District representative Mr. Dennis Reid before the South Coast Regional Commission in response to questioning by Dr. Rimmon Fay indicated that the District has applied for a waiver of the secondary treatment requirement for deep water discharge. In addition, Mr. Reid told the Regional Commission that by the year 2000, the District plans to be able to discharge. a maximum of 260 million gallons per day. Various planning efforts have identified the need to protect the restorable Bolsa Chica wetlands from encroaching residential development. Development of the Coast Trunk Sewer, of which the present application is an integral part, would bring the Huntington Beach sewage system to the very Bolsa Chica area 'that the City is proposing to annex. (See, for instance, Local Coastal Program Issue Identification, pages 20-21.) That annexation, as this sewer project, is anticipated by the'City to be completed prior to certification of the local coastal program. For these reasons, the Sierra Club asks the Coastal Commission to fully consider the cumulative impacts of permitting this sewer line segment, as provided for in Coastal Act section 30250. We submit that this project will facilitate and encourage Bolsa Chica marsh and bluff area development prior to the time when the City's and/or the County's local coastal program(s) have determined the kinds, locations, and intensities of use(s) consistent with protecting the natural values of the area. We therefore further submit that the present application does not meet the test in Coastal Act section 30254, which states in relevant part that "New or expanded public works facilities shall be designed and limited to accomodate needs generated by development or uses permitted consistent with the provisions of this division The City's Issue Identification itself (Page 38) raises the question of properly relating sewage system capacity to Coastal Act development limitations and priorities when it lists as one "issue to study con- cerning sewage" the "efft is on growth patterns of proposals for extension and additional services?" and concomitant query, "Is available sewer capacity attracting development?" Because the City has identified the issue of its sewage system as one warranting further investigation in its local coastal program, the present application conflicts directly with the provision of Coastal Act section 30604 which requires that permitted development shall not prejudice the ability of a local government to prepare its local coastal program in conformity with the policies of Coastal Act chapter 3. Finally, the construction of the sewer line on the seaward side of Pacific Coast Highway will impact the sand dunes and (perhaps) the Coreopsis that have been reported there. Coastal Act section 30240(a), however, protects such environmentally sensitive areas against destruction and provides that only uses SIERRA CLUB APPEAL OF P-78-3184 Page 3 dependent upon such resources may be allowed there. Since the sewer line could be located on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway, such an alternative should be considered if the project in its present or some future configuration is permitted. �1 t1 l 1 t7 L L 11 I U L1 1 .L . f INTERESTED PARTIES IN P-78-3184 (ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #11) Applicant: Orange County Sanitation District #11 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Mr. Dennis M. Reid Orange County Sanitation District #11 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 City: Mr. Ed Selich Planning Director City of Huntington Beach. Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Commission: South Coast Regional Coastal Commission P.O. Box 1450 Long Beach, California 90801 - Parties: Rhoda and Ken Martin 17041 Courtney Lane Huntington Beach, California 92649 M . . M a� G� ao U r_ i ALLtDISTRICTS - ITEM NO. ^� AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE SOLIDS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT As reported to the Directors at the June Board Meeting, the staff is actively engaged in securing a more permanent means of disposal for the digested sewage solids processed at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Recent discussions held with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, State and County Health Departments, County Solid Waste Management Division and representatives from the Irvine Company have resulted in concurrance with the plan of composting our sludges at the Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill until 1981, at which time the landfill will be closed and the County' s lease with the Irvine Company will be terminated. After 1981, the staff is pursuing the feasibility of composting and disposal of our sludges at a future solid waste disposal site to be operated by the Solid Waste Management Division. Composting operations are planned. to commence no later than October 1 of this year and staff has been seeking the necessary equipment required for this operation. At the June Meeting, authorization was approved for the purchase of a rototiller in an amount not to exceed $51,.000. The staff has located two additional pieces of equipment required for the composting operation. A used grader (blade) and loader have been located and are available for purchase. Staff is requesting authority to purchase a used grader in the amount not to exceed $40 ,000 (new unit cost $115,000) and a loader, also in an amount not to exceed $40,000 (new price $217,000) . ITEM NO. - AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE GAS ENGINE CYLINDER HEADS Presently we have nine Waukesha dual fuel gas engines for the main sewage pump drives at Plant No. 2. * Recent repairs to two • of the engines have depleted many of the spare parts which are maintained for emergency, as well as scheduled maintenance on these critical drive units. Staff is requesting authority for the General Manager to negotiate for the purchase of * twelve cylinder head replacement .units for these gas engines in an amount not to exceed $20,000. There is normally a long purchase time for these units. r°'°1 ITEM NO.' ' - AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR PAVEMENT REPAIRS, HOUSE LATERAL EXTENSIONS AND RELATED WORK Under the present purchasing resolution, the staff is required to solicit three competitive bids for services in excess of $500, but 'less than $4,500. There have been many instances, particularly in the past few months, where pavement failures resulting from the heavy rainfall, along with extensions of house laterals and other related work have not been accomplished in a reasonable period of time to minimize the impacts and inconveniences to the public. These delays are the result of securing competitive quotations for this critical type of work. Many contractors have failed to quote competitively on this type of work because of the unknowns associated with the repair work. Staff is, therefore, requesting authority to secure the most competitive and available contractor to perform pavement .repairs,• house lateral extensions, adjustment of manhole frames and covers, and other similar work to minimize the impacts and inconveniences to the public. This authorization would only wiave the provision of competitive quotations in these instances and would not change the purchasing resolution with the limita- tions presently- contained therein. a ITEM NO. - APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF SECONDARY TREATMENT •. REQUIREMENTS In March, the Boards authorized the General Manager to engage consultants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purpose of gathering the required information to submit an application to the EPA for waiver of secondary treatment requirements for marine discharge. Subsequently, at the April Meeting, the Directors approved initial work to commence by John Carollo Engineers, in an amount not to exceed $7,500, and by Southern California Coastal Water Research Project in an amount not to exceed $15,000. The staff has reviewed the EPA regulations concerning .the application- and the various tasks required for the submittal of -the application to be filed with EPA no later . than September 24 of this year. Included with this agenda material is an itemized total budget in the amount of $125,000. Various tasks required in the gathering of the material have been assigned to those firms and individuals who can best assist the staff in this effort. JCE, SCCWRP, Dr. Norman Brooks and Dr. Koh are familar with the Districts' operational procedures and are* knowledgeable of the effects of the wastewater discharge to the Pacific. Ocean. JCE is also knowledgeable as to the performance of the treatment* plant facilities and will assist the staff in preparing the -effects -of the pre-treatment programs which affect the industrial waste segment of- our wastewaters. J. -B. Gilbert and Associates and Kris Lindstrom (a former employee of J. B. Gilbert) are both knowledgeable of the Districts' EIS and the secondary impacts which .have been detailed in the EIS. Several maps and charts will be required which cannot be done by staff within the time limits required. The EPA has requested a very extensive analysis of the wastewaters to determine the levels of over 100 toxic compounds. Many of these compounds cannot be analyzed by the Districts ' laboratory and may require the services of an outside laboratory. The staff feels that this may be an unnecessary requirement in the application and will be discussing the matter with.-EPA officials for clarifica- tion. In the event it is an effort which must be performed, it is felt that the analysis must be made by a laboratory which is approved by the EPA. It is,. therefore, the staff's recommendation that the budget be approved as submitted and .that authorization be given to the consultants listed therein in the amounts shown for a total not to exceed $125,000. It is the staff's understanding in discussing the preparation of the waiver application with the City of San Diego and. consultants employed by the City of San Francisco- that their budget amount is in excess of $300,000. A ITEM NO.- - SURPLUS CEMENT MIXERS During the late spring and summer of 1976, Districts' personnel were processing and composting digested sewage solids at Plant No. 2. Two used cement mixing trucks were purchased to aid in this operation. With the purchase of the additional sludge handling and processing equipment, the staff feels that the cement mixers are surplus. Staff is requesting authority to dispose of the two cement mixing trucks in the most cost effective manner. i ITEM NO. - COMPLETION OF FOSTER OUTFALL BOOSTER PUMPING STATION - JOB NO. J-6-1 In September, 1974, one bid was received for the installation of two additional pumping units complete with engine drives and gear boxes to be added to the Foster Outfall Booster Pumping Station at Plant No. 2. One bid was received in the amount of $1,678,100, which was excessive and over the engineer's estimate. Based on the staff's recommendation, the Boards rejected the one bid and directed the staff to accomplish the work be force account and to negotiate for the purchase of proprietary equipment required for the project. Four equipment installation contracts have been awarded in assisting the Districts to complete the work as authorized. The project is nearing completion and it is estimated that the final work, including the Districts' engineering, administration and inspection and overhead, will cost $109,200,. for a total estimated final cost of '$1,586,504. Staff recommends that the Boards approve the completion cost estimate in order that this project can be finished as soon as possible. �t . ITEM NO.* ' *. * - - ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 78 At the February Meeting, the Boar.d .initiated annexation pro- ceedings for Tract No. 9874, which is located in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Sunnymead Street in the City of Orange. The Tract.is approximately 11. 033 acres and will contain sixteen single family residences with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The proposed development is in conformity to the Districts'. Master Plan for land use and the local sewers will be served by the City of Orange. Staff therefore recommends approval of Resolution No. 78*= * ' -7 ordering- annexation of this parcel -to the District. All necessary fees have been paid by the proponent. ITEM NO.— ' _ - AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF RENTAL OF PLANETARY GEAR UNIT FOR CENTRIFUGES f� In the fall of last year the staff felt with changing the gear ratios on the Bird Centrifuge Machines at Plant No. 2, a more efficient operation could be realized. Plaentary gear units • from Bird Machinery Company were rented at a price- of $680 per month. - The evaluation of this change in gear ratios extended for a greater period than anticipated and it is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that the Board approve the rental of these gear units for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,000 DISTRICT NO*. 7- ITEM NO. INITIAT10N OF. ANNEXAfiION NO.* '81: TRACT :940.7 At the June Board Meeting the Directors referred to staff for study and recommendation..the application from Edgewater Develop- ment Company for the annexation of -6.218 acres of territory located in the vicinity of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in -the City of Orange. The proposed development is for eight single -family residences with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet per lot. This proposed development has been approved by the City of Orange. The development is in con- formance with 'the District's Master Plan and staff, therefore, recommends* adoption- of Resolution No. 78,= -7 initiating proceedings for this annexation. r DISTRICT NO. AGENDA ITEM NO. ANNEXATION NO. 34 - TRACT NO. 10011 Warmington Development Company and The Baldwin' Company have requested annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located in the City of Yorba Linda, near the future intersection of Yorba Linda.Drive and Village Center Drive. This matter was received and filed at the June Board Meeting and referred to staff for report. The City of Yorba Linda approved the EIR on this proposed development in September of last year, and approved the tract map at the same time. The design of the proposed development was reviewed and approved by the City in February of this year. The proposed development will contain 341 single family units and will be served by the City of Yorba Linda and the Yorba Linda County Water District. This proposed development generally conforms to the District's Master Plan. Staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78, -2 initiating proceedings for this proposed annexation. 7-12-78 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN CALL A MEETING: OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE FOR WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1Q 8 - 5:30 P ,Mvj TO GIVE THE STAFF SOME ADDITIONAL DIRECTION FOR PREPARATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT BUDGETS NORMALLY WE WOULD HAVE MET ON JULY 2ETH. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS : DAVID ORTIZ ._OB PERRY -AL EARL ROGET PERHAPS YOU WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THE ATTACHED PRESS RELEASE FROM SENATOR CRANSTON'S OFFICE, AND THE LETTER FROM THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO SENATOR CRANSTON . 11-I - THE STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR BE MOVED TO ITEM 12 FOR DISCUSSION EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR , JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , July 12 1978 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m, July 12, 1978. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m. , July 12, 1978. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:41 p.m. , July 12, 1978. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 6:00 u.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:41 p.m. , July 12, 19781 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:41 p.m. , July 12, 1978. I DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:43 p.m. , July 12, 1978. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m. , July 12, 1978. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of July 1978 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set y han i ' 12 day of July 1978 S ret ry the Boards of Directors Co ty nitation Districts Nos. 2 3, , 6, 7, and 11 ME TIPG DATE July 12, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7.811 DI TR}ICT 1 JOINT BOARDS CRANKH. . . . . . . .RIMA. . . . . . . IRILEY . . . . . . . . .ANTHONY• • .•--� WELS . . . . . . . .SHARP. . . . . . .._...�.� . . . . . . . . „ F.. . . . . .r. RITEY .. . . . .ANTHONY. . . PERRY • • • • • • • • •CULVER- • • • •Z ORTIZ�. . . . . . . .EVANS. . . . . . ._� ORTIZ • - • • • • • • •EVANS. . . . . . _� DISTRICT 2 COOPER • • • • • • • •FOX• • • • • • - •�. COOPER . . • • • • • .GAMBINA. . . .-� FRIED) . . . . . . . .WEDAA. . . . . . . -_� HUTCHISON) - • • • •GLOCKNER• • •_� RASHFORD). . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . . ROGET)• •; - • • • • •GRAHAM• • • • •_�G RILEY) . . . . . . . .C-L�E. . . . . . .-1G �RASHFORD) MEYER). . . . . . • . .GRIFFIN• - • •COOPER) . . . . . . .FOX• • • • - - . . .- iG . . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . ROGET). . . . . . . .GRAHAM. . . . . .—� WELLS). . . . . . . . .HOUSTON. . . . -� .WELLS).;. . . . • • •HOUSTON. • • . . (LACAY ). . . . . . • •HUDSON• • - • • EVANS) . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . �/ SEIT? t • . . . . . . .LASZLO• . - - ._-�� CULV R). . . . . . .PERRY• • • • • • • RYCKOFF) . . . . . . .MC INNIS• • -_i, < ROTH . . . . . . . . .SEYMOUR. . . . . 0 WEISHAUPT� • • - • -MILLER• • • • - HOYT .. . . - • • • •SMITH• - • - • - •_� FINLAYSON • • - • •OLSON. . . . . . ADLER) . . .. . . . .STANTON. . . . ._� E•A*S) . . . . . . . . ..OR -ff. . . . . . WINTERS) .• . • • .VELASQUEZ• • •� SHENKMAN) • • • • • •PATTINSON• -J� CULVER . . . . . . . .PERRY• • • • • - DISTRICT 3 NYBORG . . . . . . . . . . . . .--ram ADLER . . . . . .. -SVALSTAD. . . . IANTHO�Y) . . . . . . •RILEY• • • • • - L�JG (CRANK .. . . . . . . . .RIMA. . . 0 . . ._.Leo-__ MEYER) . . . . . . . .GRIFFIN. . . . ._1ef YOUNG) • • - • • • • - •ROGET. . . . . . _1� PERRY) . • • . . • • •CULVER• . . . . .`�/ HUMME ). . . . . . • •RYCKOFF• • • • 1/ �COOPER) • • • • • • .GAMBINA- • - • • C WELSH�• . . . • • • • •SALTAFELLI•_� _ LACAYQ). . . . . . .HUDSON. . . . . . RILEY). . . . . . . . .SCHMIT• - - • - SEITZ) . . . . . . . .EASZLO. . . . 0 ._Leo-- ROTH)• - • . • . . • • •SEYMOUR-- - • GE WEISHAUPT . . . .MILLER. . . . . ._ WELSH) • • • • • • • - •SHARP- • • • - •_� FINLAYSON) . . . .OLSON• . • . • • • G iBAILEY) - -*• • • • • •SHENKMAN• • - EVANS) Ew i-z. _� SHEN MAN) • • • . • •SIEBERT• • • NYBORG) . . . . . . .f'ff•I{-_5T. . . . . . G HOYT • • • • • • - • • •SMITH- • - . . . _ lao'1 YOUNGJ . • . . . . . .ROGET. . . . . . .. ✓ ADLER) • • • • • - • •STANTON• • • • RILEY . . . . . . . .SCHMIT . . . . . ._ _ (RYCKOFF) . . . . . . .STRAUSS• - • - . G ROTH).• - . . . . •SEYMOUR - . - . .( ADLER) • • - • • • • • •SVALSTAD• • - SHEN'KMA ); . . . . S I EBERT. . . . . 1� ZOMMI CK) • • • • • • .6*1=1-A • . • •+� ZOMMICKI. . . . . . b GAIDO) VARDOULIS —� VELASQUEZ) . . • .WINTERS . . . ..'�/ WINTERS) . . . . . . .VELASQUEZ• - FRIED) • • • • • - • • •WEDAA- • • • • - DISTRICT 5 RYCKOFF) . . . . . o •WILLIAMS• • • {PUMMEL . . • . . • •RYCKOFF: • • . •_tom VELASQUEZ) • - • • •��I��TCRS• • • • ANTHONY • • • • • •RILEY • • - • •�� RYCKOFF . . . • - •STRAUSS- • • • -_.,T OTHERS DISTRICT 6 r HARPER. . . . . (RYCKOFF• . . . . . .MC INNIS. . . ._,G SYLVESTER. . �RILEY) ,- - - - o - - -ANTHONY CRANK . . . . . .RIMA. . . . . . .. � LEWIS. . . . . .. . . o . uzf� CLARKE. . . . . BROWN. . . . . . DISTRICT 7 . GAIDO . . . . . . . .VARDOULIS• • _ ti/ WOODRUFF. . . HOYT) - - • • • •• •SMITH• • • - • • •_ HOHENER. . . . RILEY) . . . . . . . .eL-ARK-- • • - - • •_ HOWARD. . . . . ORTIZ) . . . ... . . .EVANS. ... . . . : ✓ HUNT. . . . . . . (HUTCHISON) • • . .GLOCKNER- - • -_!Y" KEITH. . . . . . �RYCKOFFj * * * * ' WELSH, - -SALTARELLI - - KENNEY. . . . . • • • • • •WILLIAMS- • • •_1G LYNCH. . . . . . DISTRICT 11 MADDOX. . . . . MARTINSON. - BAILEY) . . . . . . .SHENKMAN. . . . PIERSALL. . . SHENKMAN) . . . . .PATTINSON. . .,,.� STEVENS. , RILEY) . . . . . . . .SCHMIT- • • • - -- TRAVERS. . . . 6/14/78 MEETING DATE July 12, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6.7.611 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS CRANK • „ I • • . • .RIMA. . . . . . . . 7RLEY . . . . . . . . .ANTHONY• • • •� WELSH). . . . . . . .SHARP. . . . . . . RLEY • • • • • • • • •CtC• • • • - • RILEY . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . .. PERRY . . . . . . . . .CULVER• • • • • ORTIZ . . . . . . . .EVANS. . . . . . . ORTIZ • • • • • • • • •EVANS• • • • • • COOPER . . . . . . . .FOX. . . . . . . . DISTRICT 2 COOPER GAMBINA . . . . . . . . . . . . FRIED) . . . . . . • •WEDAA• • . • • . . HUTCHISON) • • • • •GLOCKNER• • RASHFORD). . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . . ROGET)• •; • • • • • •GRAHAM• • • • - RILEY) CLARK NASHFORD) EYER)• • • • • • • • •QRIFFIN• - • - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COOPER) • • • • • • •FOX• . . • • . . . ._� • • • • • •HOLT- • • • • • •�- ROGET). . . . . . . .GRAHAM. • . . • . ✓ WELLS)• • • • • - • • •HOUSTON• • - •--� .WELLS)-. . . . . . .HOUSTON• . . . . LACAYQ)- • • • • • • •HUDSON• • • •.•- EVANS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � SEITZ)) . . . . . . . . .LASZLO• . . . . ✓ CULV R) . . . . . . .PERRY• • • - • • . RYCKOFF) . . . . . . .MC INNIS. . . ROTH . . . . . . . . .SEYMOUR. . . . WEISHAUPT • • • • •MILLER• • • • - HOYT • • • - - • • • •SMITH• - • • • • •--�s FINLAYSON • • • • •OLSON• • • • • - ADLER) . . • . • • • •STANTON. • • . 4. SH�MAN) • • • • • •PATTINSON• •_1G WINTERS) . . . . . .VELASQUEZ• • •_ • CULVER� - • • • • • • •PERRY• • • • • • DISTRICT 3 NYBORG • • • . • . • . - . . ' ---,� ANTHO • • • • • • • - • 1ADLER . . . . . . . .SVALSTAD• • . . CRANK J. . . . . . . • •R MA• • • • • • - MEYER) • • • • • • • •GRIFFIN• • • • . YOUNG) ROGET PERRY) . . . . . . . .CULVER• . • • . • HUMME ). . . . . . • •RYCKOFF• • • •__� COOPER) . . . . . . .GAMBINA. . . . • ✓ WELSH. . . . . . . . .SALTARELLI•�/ LACAYQ). . . . . . .HUDSON. . . . . . RILEY). . . . . . . . .SCHMIT• - • • . SEITZ) . . .. . . . .LASZLO• • • • • • (ROTH). . . . . . . . . .SE'YMOUR•'. . .-Z� WEISHAUPT . . . .MILLER. . . . . . WELSH)• • •.- • • • • •SHARP. . . . . . r� FINLAYSON . . . .OLSON. . . . . . . BAILEY) - • • • • • •SHENKMAN• • •� EVANS) . . . . . . . 2. - • • • - • SHEN MAN) • • • • - •SIEBERT• - • NYBORG) . . . . . . • � �. . . . . . HOYT • • • • • • • • • •SMITH• • • • • •__/ YOUNG� . . . . . . . .ROGET. . . . . . . ADLER) • • •• • - • • •STANTON• • • . r/ RILEY . . . . . . . .SCHMIT . . . . RYCKO F) . . . . . . •STRAUSS• • • • ROTH) • • • • • • • • •SEYMOUR . . . . . ADLER. . . . . . . . .SVALSTAD• • SHENKIIAN) ; . . . . -St R —C .� ZOMMI CK) . . . . . . .5-*�+ • • • • ZOMMICKJ). . . . . .ftta TA. . . . . Ie< GAIDO) . . . . . . . . .VARDOULIS• •�I� VELASQUEZ) . . . .WINTERS. . . . . WINTERS) . . . . . . .VELASQUEZ• - FRIED) • • • • • • • - •WEDAA• • • • • - DISTRICT 5 RYCKOFF) . . . . . . .WILLIAMS- - hUMMEL • • • • • • •RYCKOFF= • • • - ✓ VELASQUEZ) • • • • -►�I;ITERS- • • •� ANTHONY) . . . . . .RILEY• • • • • • - RYCKOFF). . . . . .STRAUSS• • • • - OTHERS DISTRICT 6 i- .HARPER. . . . (RYCKO F . . . . . .MC INNIS . . . . fit' SYLVESTER. - �RILEY) * CRANK�. . . . . . . BROWNowN.RIMA. . . . . . ..� r', - LEWIS. . . . . . CLARKE . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . ` . . . . . . . . . . . . DISTRICT 7 GAIDO . . . . . .. .VARDOULIS• • - WOODRUFF. . . HOYT) . • • • • • • •SMITH. . . . . . . ✓ HOHENER. . . . RILEY) . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . !/ ol HOWARD. . . . . ORTIZ) . . .... . . .EVANS. ... . . . - HUNT. . . . . . . HUTCHISON) • • • •GLOCKNER• • • • KEITH WELSH) . . . . . . . .SALTARELLI . • - . . . " RYCKOFF)• • • • • •WILLIAMS. . . . LYNCH. . . . LY . . . . . DISTRICT 11 - MADDOX. . . . . MARTINSON. . �1 BAILEY) . . . . . . .SHENKMAN. . . . ✓ PIERSALL. . . SHENKMAN) . . . . .PATTINSON. . .~ STEVENS. . . . RILEY) . . . . . . • •SCHMIT• . - • • •_ TRAVERS. . . . 6/111/78 MEET I NG DATE July 12, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1 2,3.5,6.7,81_ 1____ DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS CRANK). . . . . . . .RIMA. . . . . . . . RILEY . . . . . . • • •ANTHONY• • • • WELSH) . . . . . . . .SHARP. . . . . . . P'q RILEY • • • • • • • • •CLARK• • • • • - RILEY�. . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . .. PERRY • • - • • • • • •CULVER. . . . . ORTIZ . . . . . . . .EVANS. . . . . . . ORTIZ • - • • • • • • •EVANS• • • • • • DISTRICT 2 C.00PER • • • • • • • •FOX• . . . . . . . COOPER • • • • • • • •GAMBINA• • • - FRIED) • • • • • • • •WEDAA• • • • • • . �ROGET) - -.- oo - - - -GRAHAM HUTCHISON) • • • • •GLOCKNER• • -RASHFORD). . . . .fiOLT. . . . . . . . . . . . . RILEY) • . . . . . . •CLARK. . . . • . . �RASHFORD) H'OLT. . . .MEYER)• • • • • •G • • •RIFFIN• - • - COOPER) . . . . . . -FOX• • • • • • • • • (WELLS) HOUSTON ROGET�. . . . . . . .GRAHAM. . . . . . • • • • • • • • • . . . . .WELLS . . . . . . . .HOUSTON• - . . . L•ACAYQ). . . . . . . .HUDSON• • • • • EVANS) . . . o . - • •ORTIZ• . . . . . . SEITZ) • • • • • • • • -LAS7_LO• • • • • CULV R) . . . . . . .PERRY- • • • • • • RYCKOFF) • • • • • • •MC INNIS• - - ROTH • • • • • • • • •SEYMOUR• • • • • WEISHAUPT • • • • •MILLER• • • • - HOYT . . . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . FINLAYSON - - • • •OLSON• • - • • - ADLER) • . • . . . . .STANTON• EVANS) - • • • • • • • •ORTIZ• • • • • • - WINTERS) . • • . ..VELASQUEZ. • . (SHENKMAN) • • • • • .PATTINSON- - CULVER� . . . . . . . .PERRY• • • . . - DISTRICT 3 NYBORG • • • • • • • •PRIEST. . . . . ANTHO��!Y) . . . . o - •RILEY. . . . . . ADLER • . . . . . •SVALSTAD. . . • CRANK)• • • - • • • • •RIMA• • • • • • • MEYER) • • . • • • • .GRIFFIN• • • • • YOUNG). . . . . . . . .ROGET- • • • • • PERRY) • • • • • • . -CULVER- • . • . • HUmME )- - • • - - - •RYCKOFF• • - - COOPER) • • - • • • -GAMBINA• • . • • WELSH�. . . . . . . . .SALTARELLI- LACAYp)- - • • • • •HUDSON• • • • • RILEY). . . . . . . • •SCHMIT. . . . . SEITZ) . . . . . . . •LAS17LO• • • • • . (ROTH)• • • • • • • . . •SE'YMOUR• = • - WEISHAUPT . . . .MILLER • . • • . • WELSH)• • •.• • • - • •SHARP• • • • • - FINLAYSON • • • •OLSON- • • • • • • BAILEY) • • • • • • • •SHENKMAN• • • EVANS} • . • • . • •ORTIZ. . . . . . . kSHEN MAN) • • • - • •SIEBERT• • •-• � NYBORG) • • • • • . •PRIEST. . • . • . �HOYT • • • • • • • • • •SMITH• • • • - • YOUNG • . • . • . . •ROGET. . • . . • • ADLER) - •.• • - • • •STANTON• • - - RILEY . . . . . . . .SCHMIT . . . . . . (RYCKOFF) . . . o . . •STRAUSS• - - • ROTH) . -SEYMOUR • . . . . . • • • • • • • (ADLER) SVALSTAD . . . . . . . . . . . . SHENKMAN). . . . . SIEBERT. . . . . ZOMMICK) . . . • . - •SYLVIA• • • . - ZOMMICK)). . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . GAIDO)• . • • . • • . •VARDOULIS- • VELASQUEZ) . . • •WINTERS• . . . . WINTERS) • • • • • • •VELASQUEZ• - FRIED) • . . . • • • • •WEDAA• • • - • - DISTRICT 5 RYCKOFF) . . . . . . .WILLIAMS • • - hUMMEL • • • • - • •RYCKOFF= • • • - VELASQUEZ) • • . • -►,I.4TERS• . • - ANTHONY • • • • • -RILEY• • • • • - - RYCKOFF • • • • • •STRAUSS• • • • • OTHERS DISTRICT 6 HARPER. . . . . (RYCKO F . . . . . .MC INNIS. . . . SYLVESTER. . CRANK�.. . . . . . : .RIMA. . . . . . ., LEWIS. . . . . . RILEY} . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. • . - - CLARKE. . . . . BROWN. . . . . . DISTRICT 7 GAIDO . . . . . . . .VARDOULIS• WOODRUFF. . . CHOYT) • • • • • • • • •SMITH. . . o . . • HOHENER. . . . SRILEY) . . . . . . . •CLARK• . . . oo HOWARD. . . . . (ORTIZ) • • • ••• • • •EVANS- HUTCHISON) • • • •GLOCKNER. • . • HUNT. . . . . . . WELSH) . . . . . o • •SALTARELLI • • KEINE . . . . . . . . . . N RYCKOFF)• • • • • •WILLIAMS- • • • LYNCH . LY . . . . . . DISTRICT 11 MADDOX. . . . . MARTINSON. . BAILEY) . . . .SHENKMAN. . . . PIERSALL. . . SHENKMAN) . . . . .PATTINSON. . . STEVENS. . . . RILEY) . . . . . . . •SCHMIT• • • • • • TRAVERS. . . . 6/14/78 S� Mf_ETI,NG DATE July 12, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1 .2.3 5 6 7 F11 D1$1- ICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Cl t K . , , . . . . .RIMA. . . . . . . .— (:RILEY • • • • • • - • •ANTHONY• • • • ✓ — WELSH� . . . . . . . .SHARP. . . . . . .— _____ RILEY G6ARK . . . . . — RILEY . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . .._ ____ PERRY • • • • • • CULVER. . . . .IORTIZ�. . . . . . . .EVANS. . . . . . .— __ ORTIZ . • • • • • • •EVANS• • • • • • V, — DISTRICT 2 COOPER • • • • • • • •FOX• • • - - • • • `� — COOPER) • • • • • • • •GAMBINA- • • •—L- — FRIEp) • - • • • • • •WEDAA• • • • • - • (HUTCHI SON ) • • • • •GLOCKNER• • • ✓ RASHFORD) . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . .— — _ (ROGET) • •; • • • • • •GRAHAM• • • • •�— RILEY) • • • •CLARK. . . . . . .— — — SMEYER)• • • • • • • • • GRIFFIN• • — — COOPER) . . . . . . .FOX• • . . . . . . .— — (RASHFORD) • • • • • •HOLT. . . . . . • ✓ — WECT�_ . . . . .GRAHAM. . . . . . — — WELLS)• • • • • • • • -HOUSTON- - - - — WELLS . . . . . . . HOUSTON. . . . . LACAYp)• • • • • • • •HUDSON• • • • IEVANS) - • • • • - • •ORTIZ. . . . . . •— — — SEITZ . • - . . - - - •LAS7_LO• • • • . . — CULV R) • - • • • - .PERRY• • • • • • •— — RYCKOFF) • • • • - • •MC INNIS• • •✓ — ROTH • • •SEYMOUR• • - - •— — WEISHAUPT • • •MILLER• - • - - ✓ HOYT . . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . FINLAYSON)'• • • - •OLSON• - • • - • ADLER) . . STANTON• . • . . iEVANS) . . . . . . . . .ORTIZ. . . . . . — WINTERS) . . . . . .VELASQUEZ. . SHENKMAN) • • • • • •PATTINSON• -�_ CULVER : : : : : : : :PERRY. . . . . . DISTRICT 3 NYBORG IdR1Esf`• • • •� — ANTHONNY) • • • • • - •RILEY• • • • • • _ ADE L . . . . . . .SVALSTAD• • • • — — C.RANK)• • • - - • - • •RIMA• • - • • - •� — MEYER) • • • • • • • •GRIFFIN• • • • •— — YOUNG) . . . . . . . . .ROGET• • • - • • _ PERRY) . . . . . . . .CULVER• • • • - •— — — HUMM5)• • • • - • • •RYCKOFF• - - •�— _ NCOOPER) . . . . . . .GAMBINA. . . . .— — — WELSH . . . . . . . . . SALTARELLI•_T LACAY ) . . . . . . •HUDSON. . . . . .— — — RILEY)• • - • - • • - •SCHMIT• • - • • ✓ — SEITZ . . . . . . . .LASZLO• • • • • -- — — IROTH) . . . . . . . . . .SEYMOUR. - - --G- _ WEISHAUPT) • • • -MILLER • • • • • •— WELSH) • • •.• • • • • •SHARP• • • • • • ✓ _ fINLAYSON . . . .OLSON. . . . . . .— �BAILEY) • • • • • • • •SHENKMAN• • • ✓ EVANS) . . . . . . . .ORTIZ• • • • . . . SHENKMAN) • - • • - -SIEBERT• • • • — NYBORG) . . - . . . -PRIEST. . . . . .— HOYTJ - • • • • • • •SMITH• • • - - • — YOUNG • - • • • • - •ROGET. . . . . . . ADLER) • • • • • - • • •STANTON• - • • / RILEY . . . . . . . .SCHMIT . . . . . . — .— ROTH).. . . . . . . . .SEYMOUR . . . . — — ADLER)F) • : : : : : •STRAUSS• • • • ,— SHENKMAN),. . . . . SIEBERT. . . . . ADLER)) • SVALSTAD• • • ✓ — ZOMMICK) . . . . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . ZOMMICK) • • • • • • •SYLVIA• • • • • ✓ _ IVELASQUEZ) — — GAIDO) . . . . . . . . .VARDOULIS- • ✓ . . . .WINTERS . . . . . IWINTERS) • • • - • • •VELASQUEZ• •✓ — — ELASQUEZ) IED) • • - - • • • • •WEDAA. . . . . . — — DISTRICT 5 CKOFF) • • • • • - -WILLIAMS• - - �HUMMELT� • • • •RYCKOFF• • • • •— — — • • • • •iIINTGRS- • • •-- - ANTHONY - • - • •RILEY- - - • - • — — RYCKOFF))• • • • • •STRAUSS• • • • •- - - OTHERS DISTRICT 6 7, r HARPER. . . . . (RYC�. . . . .MC INNIS. . . ._ SYLVESTER. -� SCRANK . . . . . .RIMA. . . . . . .. �,�QDa LEWIS. . . . . .✓ l ` �`\ CLARKE. . . . .✓ RILEY) . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . �_ — �� BROWN. . . . . . ✓ DISTRICT 7 GAIDO • - - - - - . .VARDOULIS• • � — — d WOODRUFF. . . NRTIZ OYT) . . . . . . . . .SMITH• • • . . . ._ — — / k — ILEY� - : - • • • • •CLARK• • • • • • • HOHENER. . . . _ �; ` '! HOWARD. . . . . • • • -EVANS. . . . . . — /� f HUTCHISON) • • • .GLOCKNER. . . KEI �r:k' � � r HUNT. . . . . . .�— WELSH) • • • • • • - •SALTARELLI . — KEITH. . . . . . C RYCKOFF) • • • • • •WILLIAMS• • • •— KENNEY. . . . .— — LYNCH. . . . . .— DISTRICT 11 � u MADDOX. . . . .— �M MARTINSON. ._� P,AILEY SHENKMAN. . . PIERSALL. . . SHENKMAN) . . . . .PATTINSON- • — ItIUJ J)eJ� STEVENS. . . . — (RILEY) - • • • • • • •SCHMIT. . . . . . - - 6J IL'L '01 TRAVERS. . . . — 6/14/78 ) - r JULY 12, 1978, JOINT MTG. a) Report of Joint Chairman Saltarelli advised Directors that since the postcards went out to property owners, the staff had received 2700 telephone calls. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for August 2, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Perry and Nyborg to attend as guests. Chairman Saltarelli referred to letter from City of Anaheim to Senator Cranston and read press release from Cranston's office. Said he hoped that Cranston would be helpful in our waiver process. I ($pf Report of General Manager Mr. Harper mentioned items on supplemental agenda. Referred to item 18 re bid opening for Job No. PW-062. Are recommending that two items on bid be deleted involving concrete as we feel they were rather high compared to engineer's estimate. Are recommending Change Order be executed at the same time as contract is signed to reduce it by that amount. Requested that item 11(i) be removed to item 12 for discussion. (12 Re Consent Calendar item #11(i) REL reported that at the time the agenda was written, they had found a loader for $39,500 which appeared to be a good piece of equipment. After material was mailed to Directors, they had an opportunity to road test this piece of equipment and it prooved not to be too satisfactory. Were several things that had to be done to bring it up to standard. In conjunction with securing several pieces of equipment, have found two other pieces which will not exceed $50,000. Said Bill Clarke has looked at these and found them to be satisfactory. Are recommending the used grader be increased to $52,000 plus tax. The loader will be secured for $40,000 or less stipulated in the report. A new piece of equipment similar to this is about $212,000. Item was then moved,seconded and carried by voice vote. SCAG representative Director Louis Velasquez volunteered to serve as the Districts' representative on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. It was then moved and seconded to appoint him. Voice vote. Motion carried. (1 LA/OMA presentation Cindy Geter reported that this was a regional sludge management program for Los Angeles and Orange County area. Sludge plan to be completed by 1980. Referred to new brochure in Directors folders and asked that they complete questionairre and mail to LA/OMA. Said they wanted our Directors to be one of the first to see the new brochure. !r4) Dedication for P1-16 FAH reported that John Bryson and Paul DeFalco have agreed to be here and make some brief remarks at the dedication ceremony at 6:30 on August 9. Following that will have a tour of facilities for those Directors who have not seen them. If there is no objection, will be a light dinner before the meeting. Asked if there was any objections. There were none. V (16) Report re ad valorem vs. flat rate special assessment TLW reported that as Directors probably knew, we have had all sorts of phone calls. The action of the Board at the last two meetings was to direct the staff to proceed as we have done the past 25-30 years to attempt to raise revenue through levy of assessment based on assessed valuation. We have geared up to do that and at the last meeting had the first reading of an ordinance and set public hearing for purpose of considering the adoption by Districts of a fixed flat rate fee for the use of the sewers (user charge - non-variable). Though the rate between Districts does vary, the per parcel rate will be identical. The reason for double-tracking is so we would not get caught short if County Counsel or County Auditor decides that they would not process our levy of assessments as they have done every year. Said he has been spending a lot of time at County Counsel's office. Rave been doing a lot of research and have talked to local representatives at numerous Districts throughout the State. Said the Auditor has cooperated but is waiting for County Counsel's opinion today. As of 5 o'clock hadn't come down. Is going to present opinion to County Auditor on Friday. At this moment, the opinion is likely to say that while it is an assessment, in placing some of the amendments into the Revenue Taxation Code, it ties us into SB 90 which is the fundamental tax law for the State. So why it is an assessment for all other purposes under SB 154, is now considered a tax and there is no authority to levy, only for bonded indebtedness. Only other levy is that levied by Board of Supervisors. Said McCort and he have worked on this extensively. Is somewhat of a logical conclusion based on new statues. As far as allocation of tax, in Section 31 €, 32 of the new legislation we will, therefore, qualify with any other special District for receiving our pro rata allocation for this coming year. We are already geared up for the user charge for 1979-80. Are certain that we will have in our possession a definitive answer from County Counsel or County Auditor prior to public hearing next Wednesday as to whether it is an assessment or outside the purvue of Jarvis. Will redesign the ordinance with automatic dates to protect ourselves by getting the flat rate in. Saltarelli asked if the Board of Supervisors would be required to allocate our share of the funds to us or not? TLW said, of necessity, seems to me will have to be getting a tax allocation. Therefore, we would be getting a pro rata share of the $4.00. Riley stated that we shouldn't expect a whole lot because they also have to allocate to fire department, sheriff, etc. Allocations are going to be getting pretty thin. Saltarelli added that we should levy flat rate so if we get nothing, will be covered. Can reduce next year. TLW advised that there is no action before the Board right now. Anthony stated that there is nothing in the State guidelines indicating that this District has to get anything at all. Said flat rate has not bee received well at all. Is penalizing the little people. Don't think it is really fair. Think we are going to have a very serious problem next week and throughout the year. Asked the staff if they have any good ideas. FAH said that was true. Are many parcels that will increase. At between 13,000-15,000 A.V. is about a push with last year. The charge that we have now varies by District from $3.25 to $5.00 per month. Is very inexpensive situation for waste treatment. However, are other problems with someone who has been paying $18 for several years and all of a sudden it is $39. and for some parcels that are not being served. /'! We are talking about some provision in the ordinance for a rebate for these. We have been wanting to talk to computer people to see if there is some way that they could get a different rate. Anthony mentioned the difference between an apartment or house having the same charge. FAH said can get listing on apartment houses County-wide?? We do have a Class II charge for those properties that use -2- I more than 10,000 gallons so could charge them accordingly. We do collect $2 million from the industrial community. is Anthony added that many people think this is an entirely new fee. Don't understand this is a replacement. Riley agreed. Fox said he has received about 20 calls and agreed with Supervisors. In talking about the user fee concept, will buy that. What they want to know is how it is that an apartment house gets by with paying the same as they do. Don't have answers for that. Need to have some ready answers for these people. Have to back up user concept. Culver asked if this is a user charge based on 100a funding of our operation and was answered, yes. Deducted $2.2 million and that is as far as we can go, right? Answered, right. Saltarelli stated that the only way user could get a deduction is in levying total charge less allocation from County. Can't count on anything from County. Asked Directors what do we want to do? Take a $7,000,000 loss or take it out of reserves or levy a charge? Don't have enough time by August loth. Roget asked if this would be just for one year and was answered, yes. Vardoulis suggested one possible way out for one year would be to assess what they had last year. Saltarelli said we couldn't do that with 408,000 different amounts. Vardoulis said to just use assessor's tapes. Saltarelli advised that IRWD is charging $8.00+, South Laguna $9.25. Ours is $4.00+ Just about half as much as everybody else is paying. Vardoulis still thought we should levy flat fee based on what was paid last year. FAH discussed possibility of going in with 900 of what was on the current roll for last year. Don't know if we can do that. JWS said this is one of the items computer people are looking into. Also, there are a lot of new parcels that have developed since last year's tapes. Third propblem is to be able to get information from County Assessor's files. Ryckoff suggested we could maybe assess commercial property more next year to make up.for this year. Smith asked what LA or San Diego does? FAH answered San Diego is on a user fee charge on the water bill. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts have one small District and are going to try a user fee in that District. All their other Districts will take their chances to see what they get on their p;o rata share. Re putting our charge on water bill, are some 80 water companies here within our Districts. FAH advised further that we have been hearing from news media. The Register reported asked to pass this on to the Board. Looked over our files and went to County Auditor and County Treasurer's office and took last year's budget information and concluded that we had an $85 million pot in County Treasurer's office and don't need to collect anything for 2 or 3 years. Asked JWS to compute what fee would be when we run out of money. We think we are running a good operation with long-range planning. If we can do it for $34 per month, think it is pretty good. Saltarelli said at press conference had The Register, LA Times, Daily Pilot, KWIZ, 'Oak Channel 2 news and Huntington Independent. They asked some very good questions and left them with impression that we were operating well and price was well justified. Came out with positive feeling from that press conference but since that time, the mailing went out. -3- FAH said we are open to any suggestions as to how to set this up. Will rent some chairs and put out in the parking lot. Saltarelli suggested we could possibly buy some advertising space and explain card in more simple language. Culver asked if we hadn't asked for an extension of the August loth date to have our figures and facts together. Was told we asked for extension to Sept. loth but haven't been advised yet. Anthony asked if there were any other counties with a similar situation. TLW said Alameda County and Flood Control District are going ahead and trying to levy their assessment outside the purvue of Jarvis. Said County Counsel has apparently advised Flood Control that they can continue with special assessment. Are lots of different opinions. Saltarelli added, in talking about allocations by Board of Supervisors, this allocation should be from regular tax revenues and not surplus allocations. Anthony said of the share that goes to special districts, part goes to ?? TLW disagreed. Said legislation has done more to add confusion. SB 154 and that which cleaned up SB 154 have two fund chapters re tax apportionment and tax allocations. So closely related. Is a great amount of confusion relative to apportionment re surplus. Allocation formula really pretty simple. Directs County Auditor to take revenue and rates levied by all special districts. Next step is to take $4 and levy it out. The problem is they are vague in order to give local representatives elbow room and discretion. Don't agree with that interpretation. Formula is not wrong. AMA JWS reported that yesterday we received our first check in payment of the District 2 flat fee. Have made at least one friend--one man had two parcel numbers and had been paying two tax bills for years. Griffin said we have a big bullet to bite. Think we owe it to ourselves and other people to indicate to them what our attitute will be and what actions will be taken this following year. Think we should leave this meeting saying we are going to take action to develop a plan for user fees based on equity for small guy and big user. Think that will establish the basis for what this District will be for years to come. Saltarelli said that is exactly what our intention is. Can't eliminate inequity the first year but are already planning on taking parcels that are not using system off. Saltarelli said we would know more on Wednesday night. Williams suggested that since many people think this is the first time charge, should make a transparency .of last year's tax bill to point out that it has been there. Anthony added we should prepare some very simple graphics for next week. Saltarelli said we should have a list of what various districts charge as opposed to what we charge. Should put this in report. Wedaa said we should put some of these thoughts in a one-page handout for meeting. (23) DISTRICT 5 - Other business REL gave status report on siphon project. SyLid we are working with consultant /* to prepare project report for Board's consideration before EIR completed. Feel that there was an inadequacy with draft EIR and will look at several alternatives including one favorably approved by Coastal Commission. All alternatives will be reviewed in EIR. Feel that this report should be before Board for consideration in September. -4- (29) DISTRICT 11 - Other business /'k� FAH reported re Coast Highway Trunk Sewer. Suggested we retain Brown, Hart, Ball and Baerwitz in Long Beach (Allen Tebbetts, Attorney) for legal advise re coastal issues for an amount not to exceed $2,000. It was so moved and seconded. Motion carried. (31)ayr DISTRICT 2 - Annexation 35 - Bryant Ranch V David Colgan spoke on behalf of John Wertin Development Company. Said there was some urgency in this. Want to attach the fees to those 1508 acres and then have . installment payments for 7 years subject to Board approval. Said they would like to have fees deferred for open space until such time as service is provided for v this area. In working with City of Yorba Linda and beginning annexation proceedings, City advised they would notify Districts when development begins there. Would like to close annexation proceedings as soon as possible. TLW reported regarding this proposal. Developer has submitted a draft agreement. C� Are some considerable concerns. Re fee schedule provided for urban area not pays le at t is time, the Districts have never extended payment schedule to 7 years, 3-5 at most. Question relative to fee for open space area. In the past we will defer them until open space becomes urban'aiea.---TRe des then in effect would apply rather than the fees due now. TLW said the agreements can be formulated rather quickly. Nothing terribly new or foreign to his office or the Districts. Saltarelli asked TLW if he would prepare a report for Directors at next meeting. Tom said all of our efforts have been devoted to this tax problem recently. If there is an urgency, could be put on July 19th agenda. Asked how serious is time problem? They said they would like to move as fast as possible. Are scheduled to exercise option agreement next month. Want to have some assurance that they will have green light and will be able to get into the District. w Saltarelli said he was not sure we could have agreement ready by next week. )' Not sure what other information we need. FAH added that actually, information to date is rath sketchy-compared to other annexations. Are really looking at ncec�ptual i e Board could declare thei-r_intent_t_o approve agreement at Y1 such time t d is ready to move. Mr. Harper added that as to e Directors knew, F we Trope to apply for wiaver of secondary treatment _requirements- One of the statutory items that we will have to address in the waiver is that no substantial new territory can be taken in outside the District. Have been talking to the people in Washington trying to get a clarification on this. Could actually mean we can't ake in a large new area. Will no eare up unitl the first part of Augu t—eoffld—come ac�with report re payment of fees and interest rate and address how the open space should be tied up. Open space will pretty much be tied to local entity to be responsible. These are some of the issues. May have to ask for some sort of security on the fees. Smith said he thought we certainly needed a complete report. In line with Prop 13, if people found out we did something life this, wouldn't go over very good. Holt said he would like to see that there is an entity holding the property. Don't ` like 6%, awful cheap. Graham stated that would seem to be almost asking the impossible for the staff to have report, etc. by next week. Saltarelli added that staff and Counsel are totally involved in revenue program. -5- David Colgan stated that it was his understanding that it would take a period of months to have final annexation of the property. Possibly November or December. Asked if it would be possible to start proceedings with LAFCO to get things rolling? Saltarelli answered that there was nothing to stop them from making application for annexation to City through LAFCO. TLW stated that conceptual approval from the Board is the first step that staff needs. Not unusual situation but need deposit to start reports. Can't come back with report one week from tonight to satisfy Directors as to substance. %• Need motion approving conceptual idea of annexation fee programand to proceed r with all due haste. It was'-so moved by Wedaa and he addesLeou uesi_a. �• deposit of approximately $2,000 for necessary charges. Restated motion to approve idea in concept subject to difinitive agreement approved by property owners an District. Motion seconded.---- TLW added it would. be most appropriate for FAH or he to direct letter to proponents re understanding which would include that District is .not -b-nound to fins ize is annexation if waiver provision contingent on no annexation. Federal requirements may require us to bail out. Was so moved and seconded to add--fTiat to motion. Holt said he failed to see what the big panic was to get going so fast. Are other things much more important at this time. Wedaa replied that they have an option on Bryant Ranch within next 30 days. Very substantial investment on their part. Holt said would be to the best option of property to give extension of time. Smith added he wanted a good understanding that we arenot committed if Federal law affects our waiver.- Colgan said they are not asking to be annexed tomorrow. Would just like to get the Board to approve as to concept knowing a number of factors have to be considered. Want to get the show on the road. Saltarelli said he thought the motion would take care of that. Colgan said they have a check for $2,000 tonight that they would be glad to pay for report charges. Directors wanted to be sure we didn't go with 7 year agreement. Colgan said they selected 7-year figure prior to talking to staff. Realize now 5 years would be more appropriate. Perry thought they should direct staff to go to work on this but not take any money yet. Holt wondered if we have a working contract for annexation, may weaken our position re waiver. Could possibly happen. Reiterated motion to begin processing and have applicant pay for staff time with no commitment--far—Di.�tzict to accent annexaSi_on. Voice vote on motion. Motion carried. -6-