The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-07-12 OCR. I.._) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, F'OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF'ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF'F'-RAMP, SAN DIEGO F'REEWAY) July 5, 1978 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1) 2 .. 3, 5_, 6., 7 & 11 . ----··----·--- WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 1978 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled upcomi!:g meetings: TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 ADJOURNED JOINT MEETING -Wednesday, -July 19, 1978, at 6: 00 p .rn. EXECUTIVE COMMI'l'TEE & , FISCAI.J POLICY COHMIT'rEE -Wednesday, July 26, 1978, at 5: 30 p.rn. and/or Wednesday, August 2, 1978, at 5:30 p.rn. / COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 "'--' (714) 540-2910 (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Month Meeting Date Committee Meeting Date July July 12, 1978 July 26, 1978 August Aug 9, 1978 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 1978 Sep 27, 1978 October Oct. 11, 1978 Oct 25> 1978 November Nov 8, 1978 Nov 22, 1978 December Dec 13, 1978 None Scheduled January Jan 10, 1979 Jan 24, 1979 February Feb 14, 1979 Feb 28, 1979 March Mar 14, 1979 Mar 28, 1979 April Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979 June June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 July July 11, 1979 July 25, 1979 • II •· BOARDS .JJF DIRECTORS Countf Sln.il.).tion Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, .California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE JULY 12J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY. AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETI°NG IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2). Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary ...... · (4) Recognition of special guests (5) (6) EACH DISTRICT ADJOURNMENTS POST£D.V COMP & MilEAGE •.. ~ ••• , FILES SET UP ,..- RESOLUTIONS ·~·E·Rii~i~oV lffiERS WRIITEN .. ._,(." ..... -. MINUfES. WRlTIEN~ •• - MINUTES flLED ••••• IL.- Consideration of motions approving mi~utes of the following meetings, ('(\\~ as mailed: District I -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 2 -June 14, 1978, regular, June 21, 1978, adjourned and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 3 -June 14, ·1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 5 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 6 June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 7 -June 14, 1978, regula1.. and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 11 June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned . .. '·"" "-"' fVll s (7) M{S (8) ·Annual election of Joint Chairman. -Nominee: Director Don Saltarelli Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman -Nominee: Director Don Fox / (9) ALL DISTRICTS (IO) -Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of iOU CALL VOTE.._ __ the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall I (ll) CHAIRMAN be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. ll See page (s) "B II and "D" ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, ll(A)THROUGH ll(R) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff me mber, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members SALTARELLI . PLEASE R . UNDER ITEEMOVE ITEM M #12 of the public who wish to remove an item from the calendar shal l , upon recognition by the chair, state ~~cU::~ss and designate by letter the item to be ~-"-Leodar. (i) TO BE CONs10EREo * * * * * * * * * Roll Call Vole or Cast Unanimous Ballot .y items are to be deleted from the COI1St::11 ... _ Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- ;, (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ®--·······-ALL DISTRICTS LETI'ER ............. . .. l...,_J A/C -•• TKLR ... \ -l .~.C.~,tV .. _ ... ,. fllE --- LETTER -- A/C :.; •• TKLR ->Q.c.~ ~ flL& •••••• 7 . ~--·- A/C _TKLR - FILE ................. . ~······ LmER ••••••• -..... A/C .... TKLR - @ ..... ~·-· ~- /~. C •••• TKLR i'i..1' ~Q~ ~ LETIER- (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-031, to Hooker Chemical Corporation, for the price of .0817 per pound. See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1978-79 fiscal year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,100 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Rosswood Industries, Inc. in the amount of $19,375.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-124, authorizing payment of interest earned on invested couuningled funds to the fund in which the interest is accrued. See page "F" nsideration of motion authorizing payment to Bird Machine Company 1 t of $7,000.00 for rental of planetary gear unit for use during the re · "fu e gear box unit at Reclamation Plant No. 1 sludge dewatering a (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of November 9, 1977, authorizing completion of Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, by Districts' force account, and approving increase in the maximum amount for said work from $57,706.00 to $109,200.00. See page "G" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of two surplus District cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-125, authorizing execution of Lease/Purchase Agreement with Envirotech Corp. re evaluation of solids dewatering filter press for Interim Solids Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, in form approved by the General Counsel, for a maximum amount of $10,000. (Up to 87~% of cost to be reimbursed to Districts pursuant to existing agreement with LA/OMA) See page "H" ~Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate ~~d award purchase of Used Grader, Specification No. A-093, for an amount not to exceed $ftf; 83if plus tax and freight; and purchase of Used Loader, Specification No. A-094, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight, to be used for sludge composting operation (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- ------f .. - (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ~--~- LElTER ........... ·· A/C _.TKLR .. .. /~ .. 7 A/C •... TKlR .... FILI! ....... ".m .. - LETTER --·-···-···· AJC _ •• TnR ·~ s;._,_y_,:b...~~u _. ..... --.-- --················· --····················· FllE ~ .. ~···~ "~···· A/C •.•. TKllt .•.. ~.:>-.!.~I ~-··· FI LE ................. . LETTER ......... ~ .. . A/C .... TKLR .. .. ~t=~ A/C •.•• TKLR -- ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of r.1otion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of 12 Cylinder Head Replacement Units for du a l fuel gas engines at Headwork s "C", Plant No. 2 , Specification No. E-094, for an a mount not to exceed $20,000 (k) Consideration of motion a uthorizing staff to procure necessary contracting services up to $4,500 for pavemen t repairs, house lateral extensions, ad jus tm ent of sewer manhole frames and covers and related work from qu a lified firms immediately available to perform said work, without competitive biddi ng, as required by Districts' Purchasing Re solution No. 74-98 (1) Consi de:ra~ion of motion authorizing the General l·lanager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No . 34220 to Haul-Away Containers, to ~ increase maximum amo unt from $4,500 to $6,000 for added disposal services r equire d due to storm damages during 197 8-79 DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from R. E. and Terry Hur s t for annexation of .607 acres of t erritory to the Di s trict in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, and refer to s taff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No . 19 -Hurst Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" (n) Consideration of Standa rd Resolution No. 78-127-2, authorizing initiati on of proceedings to annex 165.676 acres of t erritory to the Di s trict in the vicinity of one-half mile northeast of --the future int ersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center ~~ Drive in the City of Yorba Lind a , proposed Annexation No . 34 -~~hf Tract No. 10011 to County San itation District No . 2 (o) Con s ide r ation of Resolution No . 78-128-2, accept ing Grant of Easeme nt from Sant a Fe La nd Improvement Compan y fo r right-of-way in connection with construction of the Orch a rd (Ke llo gg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No . 2 -20, at no cost to the Distri ct . See page '·JI! DISTRICT 5 (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file . and s upport .th e r e quest of Newport -Irvine Waste-Man ageme nt Planning Ag e ncy, d ate d June 15 , 1 978 , for a ll member agen cies to vigorously enforce their current provi sions f or prevention of eros ion from s ub divi sion de ve lopm e nts that a r e tributary to the Upper Newpo rt Bay . See page "K" DI ST RIC T 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolut ion No . 78 -1 29-7 , a ut h oriz ing initi ation of proceedin gs to annex 6.218 acres of territory to the Di s tri ct in the vi cin ity of the northwes t corner of Randall Street a nd Kennyrne a d Stree t in the City of Orange , propos e d Annex a tion No. 8 1 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sa nitation District No. 7 (CONSENT CA LENDAR co ntinue d on page 5 ) -4 - • (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) • '\.._,) FILE --.... u, (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-130-7, ordering annexation of 11.027 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 76 -Tract No. 9874 to County Sanitation District No. 7 -~~ A/C -TKLR •••• END ·of CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- J. (13) ALL DISTRICTS ~~~ Consideration of motion authorizing appointment of Directo~V~ to serve as the Districts' representative on the Southern California l '-Jl • 1c -TKLR -Association of Governments 208 Program Conuni ttee, to replace retired '--'' · Director Frances Wood ~ ALL DISTRICTS Presentation by LA/OMA representative re sludge disposal alternatives ALL DISTRICTS ----·-···- Staff report re dedication ceremonies for 50 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 ----·-~ ALL DISTRICTS FILE ---~ Status report re continued levy of ad valorem special assessment vs. flat UTrER----rate special assessment for sewer service and inunediate availability to be we _ma_ collected on the tax roll for funding 1978-79 budgetary requirements (17) ALL DISTRICTS --Consideration of actions in connection with preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, pursuant to 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: FILE -··············· (b) 'eTT!R -·-····-··· ~. .c _ma.... ..~ \ ~ ~~·-=f:t-tffis:::::::~· lJ\ (c) FILE ................. : Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated June 29, 1978. See page "L" Consideration of motion amending March 8, 1978, Board action to authorize the General Manager to engage the services of consulting firms for the purpose of gathering required information for application for waiver of secondary.treatment requirements, and increasing the total maximum authorization from $50,000 ~o an amount not to exceed $125,000 Consideration of motion amending April 12, 1978, Board actions re engagement of consulting services (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b"): &ETTER ·----( 1) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Q~& .. ··~\S ~.!~ ~ ... ----··-·····-·· . FILE ..... ·-··-····· Lm!R ---·"" (2) A/C .... TKLI\ .... . / ~ ... ~.~-ovfi\ \~ ..................... ,,, for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $15,000 to $20,000 Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with . Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment require- ments, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $7,500 to $45,000 (d) ~ Consideration of actions authorizing engagement of consulting services for the following (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b 11): '-' ~.0~~1) ~= I\~ Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of J. B. Gilbert & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000 (Item #17 continued on page 7) -6- (17) ALL Dl STIUC'J'S (Con tinued from page 6) ~-.. /,.L .... IV\\~ ~d) (2) ~--·-······· .. Con s ideration of motion to receive, file and a ccept proposal of K. P. Lindstrom Ii As sociates fo r services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amoun t not to exceed $8 ,000 (3) . ~-~.UJ&~3:h~ (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the Genera l Manage r to contract for services with outside l aboratories for toxic ana l ysis work , for a total amou n t not to exceed $25 ,000 Consideration of mo tion authorizing the Genera l ~tana ger to cont ract with various firms for mapping and drafting services , for a tota l amount not to exceed $9,500 LETIER ............ .. we __ TKLR .. .. ~~ (1 8 ) ALL DISTRICTS Othe r business and communications or supplement a l agenda items, if any : FILE ................. . Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the p l ans a nd specifications for Miscell a neous Paving at Treatment Pl an t No. 1 , J ob No. PW-062, providing for a change in the fin a l completion date from 45 days to 90 days, and prov iding th at the work shall commence within 30 days from the date of the contract LETIER ···-·······-ITE M S ON SUP PLEMENTA L AGEND A A/C _.JKLR -· ----- mnrt111Viii6or Cas t \ C' (a_ 2) Unanimous Ba ll ot N\ ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 78-126, to r ec eive and file bid tabu l ation and recommendation , and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Pav in g at Treatment Pl ant No. 1 , Job No. PW -062, to Sully Mil l er Contracting Company, in the amo unt of $100,180.00 See pages "I" and "II" ~--·---· SUPPLE!:EENMTSA LONAGE·ND ' / m "· l~···-···· A/C __ TKLR -··· Q .D.\@y (.a-3) IT EMS ON SUPPLEMENT AL AGE ND A Conside r at ion of motion approvi n g Change Order No. J to t he plans a nd specifications for Miscel l ane ous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1 , J ob No. PW-062, authorizing a deduction of $21,960.00 fro m the contract w:i t h Sul l y-~lil l er Contracting Company due to Fl Lt ·················· .t-,,r ) ~v (lEnER ·····-····· · a deletion of bi d items 7 and 8 re sidewalk a nd ramp at the sludge hopper. See page "II 1" A/C •.•. tnR --· (19) ~----...-._ u~ess ancl COflll!U!!licatio ns or supplemental agenda items, if any ·- ·F ILE -·--··--···- LETTER •. -..:.....- A/C .. -TKLR - (20) DISTR I CT 1 Consideration of mot i on to ad j ourn to 6:00 p .m., J u ly 19, 1 978 (2 1) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda it ems, if any M\~c 21) (a) IT EMS ON SUPPLEil\ENTAL AGE NDA Co n si d e ration of mo tion approving Addendum No . 1 to the plans and s pecifica tions for Wests ide Intbrceptor Faci l ities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, clarifying insuran ce requ i rements and r e_v ising page 5 of t._he Proposal re Bid )tern No. 8 (22) DI STR ICT 3 Consideration ~DISTRICT 5 ~ Other business of mo t i on t o adjourn to 6:00 p .m., July 19, 1978 9:3!{ and corrnnunications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24 ) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 ~··'-f I (25) DISTRICT 6 O~~ications or supp l ementa l agenda items, if any ~rnaLEE.R·~.·.·.··~~ .... ~;-~ v-~ (26) DISTRICT 6 ~~...-'-'-...... Consideration of motion t o adjourn to 6:00 p.m., Jul y 19 , 1978 <iS'·. fl A/C ·-TKl.R •• ~~ -(27) DISTRICT 7 ~~\r Other b u si ne~s and _communications or supp leme ntal agenda items , if any · --Roll-G&lµlete or Cast lil/5£27) (a) Consideration of Standard Reso lution No. 78-131-7, orde ring Unan imous Ballot ''I annexation of 1.555 acres of territory to th e District in the ITEMS ON vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda Drive in the Lemo n SUPPLEMEN TAL AGE NDA He ights area, proposed Annexation No. 61 -La Vereda Drive Annexation to County Sanit a tion District No . 7 (to aJ..s o be annexed to the 7th Sewer Mai ntenance District) (28) DI STR ICT 7 Con s ideration of motion to adjourn to 6 :00 p .m., July 19, 1978 y :q / ISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 ,( Consid eration of motion to adjourn to 6 :00 p.m., July 19, 1978 ~ '.tt5 (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 35 -Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2: t/' ·_"'1,.1 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John Wertin Development Corporation, dated June 30, 1978, requesting annexation we~/ on behalf of the property owners of approximately 3,331 acres of ~ll' territory located north of the Santa Ana River and easterly of the terminus .of Esperanza Road, See p~e ~ --~~~~.'35-~~~S~.CL NOTE: The proponents request that fees be paid on 1,508 acres of territory proposed for urban use based upon the annexation acreage fee in effect on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal annual ~.kn,...N)Qs installments commencing one year following annexation, with interest \.fo1'Y..~> at 6% per ~nnum; and deferral of acreage fees on the balance of 1,823 acres of open space until service is required for said acreage, at which time annexation acreage fees would be due and payable at the fee in effect at the time service is provided. ~ Presentation by proponents FILE················· @)Report of General Counsel LETIER ••··••·••••·•• we _ .. TKLR. •••• (d) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare a report re proposed annexation for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting on ..Jttl' 19, 1978 A u~vs..-t-9 (32) or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 19789"·'°~ -8- \ ' 'i.. .\ --:-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II County Sanitation Districts ol Orange_ County, California Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 71.C 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE JULY 12) 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMEN! HEAD~ IN ADDITION) STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M~· IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING.WEDNESDAY'S MEETI°NG IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary .. .,. (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See Sl:lf'pleme~tal ageHaa . (6) EACH DISTRICT (7) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following m,eetings, as mailed: District 1 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 2 -June 14, 1978, regular, June 21, 1978, June 22, 1978, adjourned and adJoumed Distric:t 3 -June· 14,.1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 5 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 6 June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 7 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 11 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned Annu:i.1 election of Joint Chairman -Nominee: Director Don Saltarelli (8) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman -Nominee: Director Don Fox (9) ALL DISTRICTS (10) Reports of: (a) Joint Chairm a n (b) General Ma nager (c) General Counsel ALL DIST RICTS JIOll CAU VOTE __ _ Considera tion of roll call vote motion ratifying payme nt of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows : (Each Director shall J be call e d only once a nd that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represent ed , unless a Director expresses a desire to vote different l y for any District) JOINT OPERATI NG FU ND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTL AY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and ''C" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page (s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO . 6 NONE DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page (s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. ll See page (s) "B" and "D" (ll) ALL DISTRICTS CO NSENT CALENDAR I TEMS NOS , ll(A)THROUGH ll(R) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring dis cussion or further explana tion and unl es s any partic ular item is requested to be r emo ved from the consent cal e ndar by a Director, staff me mber, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separa te dis cuss ion of these items. All items on the con sent cal endar will be enacted by one action approving a ll motions, and casting a un a n imo us ballot for resolutions includ e d on the consent calenda r. All items removed from the cons e nt c a l endar shall be considered in the regular order of business . Me ~rs of the public who wish to remove an item from the CHAIRMAN SALTARELLI. -i..._ c:Ju1 1 L l!~ recogn1 ti on by the cha ir, state gnate by letter the item to be PLEASE REMOVE ITEM (i) TO BE CONSIDERED e ndar. UNDER ITEM #12 Roll Call Vote or Cas t Un aniroous Ball ot * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determ111c .......... my items are to be deleted from the consent cal endar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda i tems appearing on the consent calendar not specifica lly removed from s am e. -2- i (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-031, to ooker Chemical Corporation, for the price of .0817 per po d. See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1978-79 fiscal year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,100 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Rosswood Industries, Inc. in the amount of $19,375.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-124, authorizing payment of interest earned on invested conuningled funds to the fund in which the interest is accrued. See page "F" nsideration of motion authorizing payment to Bird Machine Company 1 t of $7,000.00 for rental of planetary gear unit for use during the rep · "fu e gear box unit at Reclamation Plant No. 1 sludge dewatering a (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of November 9, .1977, authorizing completion of Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-10, by Districts' force account, and approving increase in the maximum amount for said work from $57,706.00 to $109,200.00. See page "G" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of two surplus District cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-125, authorizing execution of Lease/Purchase Agreement with Envirotech Corp. re evaluation of solids dewatering filter press for Interim Solids Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, in form approved by the General Counsel, for a maximum amount of $10,000. (Up to 87!2% of cost to be reimbursed to Districts pursuant to existing agreement with LA/OMA) See page "H" J~ (i) Consideration of motion authorizing/the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of Used Grad~Specification No. A-093, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight; and purchase of Used Loader, Specification No. A-094, for an amount not to exceed.$40,J>OO plus tax and freight, to be used for sludge composting operation l J ·. l L ~fl) A-7\0 .J <10---( • ~' ,, •. ·1 V cltt•'\ ·cco~~:NT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- '. ,. (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of 12 Cylinder Head Replacement Units for dual fuel gas engines at Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-094, for an amount not to exceed $20,000 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure necessary contracting services up to $4,500 for pavement repairs, house lateral extensions, adjustment of sewer manhole frames and covers and related work from qualified firms immediately available to perform said work, without competitive bidding, as required by Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 34220 to Haul-Away Containers, to increase maximum amount from $4,500 to $6,000 for added disposal services required due to storm damages during 1978-79 DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from R. E. and Terry Hurst for annexation of .607 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and reconnnendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 -Hurst Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" (n) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-127-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 165.676 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-128-2, accepting Grant of Easement from Santa Fe Land Improvement Company for right-of-way in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, at no cost to the District. See page 1·J" DISTRICT 5 (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file.and support.the request of Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency, dated June 15, 1978, for all member agencies to vigorously enforce their current provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision developments that are tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. See page "K" DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-129-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-130-7, ordering annexation of 11.027 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 76 -Tract No. 9874 to County Sanitation District No. 7 END·OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- ' .-.L· (13) ALL DISTRICTS (14) (15) (16) Consideration of motion authorizing appointment of Director _.,.,~~.-.-..-----to serve as the Districts' representative on the Southern Cali ornia Association of Governments 208 Program Committee, to replace retire'd Director Frances Wood ALL DISTRICTS Presentation by ~~~lf'-~G~cresentative re sludge disposal alternatives ALL DISTRICTS . ( Staff report re dedication ceremonies for 50 MGD Act .. ~~~. ,t-~d Slu·d'7 Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 n d.> ,,~~·-Ll. !; 7 ?f f/{). ~ ALL DISTRICTS Status report re continued levy of ad valorem special assessment vs. flat rate special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be collected on the tax roll for funding 1978-79 budgetary requirements (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions in connection with preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, pursuant to 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated June 29, 1978. See page "L" (b) Consideration of motion amending March 8, 1978, Board action to authorize the General Manager to engage the services of consulting firms for the purpose of gathering required information for application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, and increasing the total maximum authorization from $50,000 to an amount not to exceed $125,000 (c) Consideration of motion amending April 12, 1978, Board actions re engagement of consulting services (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b"): (1) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $15,000 to $20,000 (2) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment require- ments, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $7,500 to $45,000 (d) Consideration of actions authorizing engagement of consulting services for the following (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b"): (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept propo.sal of J. B. Gilbert & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000 (Item #17 continued on page 7) -6- . I (17) AL L Dl STH I CTS (Continued from page 6) (18) (d) (2) Consideration of motion to receive , fi l e and accept proposa l of K. P . Lindstrom & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $8,DOO (3) (4) Conside rat ion of mot ion authorizing the General Manager to contract f or services with outside labo ratories for toxic analysis work, for a total amount not to exceed $25,000 Consideration of motion authorizing the Genera l Manager to contract with various firms for mapping and d_ra fting services , for a total amount not to exceed $9 ,500 ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, i f any: (18) (a-1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the IT EMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA plans and spe cifications for Miscellaneous Pavi n g at Treatmen t Plant No. 1 , J ob No. PW-062, providing for a change in the final comp l etion date from 45 days to 90 days, and providing that the work s hall commence withi n 30 days from the date of the cont ract Ro ll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (a-2) Consid e ration of Reso lu tion No . 78 -1 26, to receive and file Qid tabulation and recomme ndation, and awarding contract for Miscell aneous Paving at Treatment Plant No . 1, Job No. P\\'-062 , to Sully Miller Contract ing Company, in the amount of ITE MS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGEND~ $100, 180. 00 See pages "I" and "II" (a-3) Consideration of motion approvi n g Change Order No . 1 to the ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA p l ans and s pecifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Pl a nt No . 1, Job No . PW-062, authorizin g a deduction of $21,960.00 from the contract with Sully-M i ll er Contra cting Company due to a deletion of bid items 7 and 8 re sidewalk and ramp at the sludge hopper. See page "J 11" (1 9) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRIC T 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p .m., J uly 19, 1 978 (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or suppl emental agenda items, if a ny (21) (a) ITEMS ON SUPPLEJ.~ENTAL AGEN DA Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . l to the plans and specifications for Westside Int~rceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No . 3-13-1, clarifying i n sura n ce requi r em en ts a nd revising page 5 o f the Proposal re Bid It em No. 8 Roll Ca ll Vote or Cast Unani mo us Ballot (22) DISTRICT 3 Con s ide ration of mo tion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 19 78 (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental a genda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Conside ration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m ., July 1 9 , 1 978 'I • y • (25 ) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communication s or s upplemental agenda items , i f a ny (26) DISTRICT 6 Con sideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p .m., July 19, 1978 (27) DI STRICT 7 Other bus ines s and communications or s uppl e me ntal agenda items, if any (27) (a) ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTA L AGENDA Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 78-131-7, ordering annexation of 1.555 acres of territory to t he District in the vicinity of Sky line Drive and La Vereda Drive in the Lemon Heights area , proposed Annexation No. 61 -La Vereda Drive Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (28) DISTRIC T 7 ~JI Con sideration of motion to a djourn to 6:00 p.m ., Ju l y 19, 19 78 (29 ) DI STRICT 11 Other bu s in ess a nd communication s or s upp lementa l age n da items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 (jtt Consideration of mo tion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m ., July 19, 1978 {c 't •. (31) DISTRICT 2 / Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 35 -Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John Wertin Development Corporation, dated June 30, 1978, requesting annexation on behalf of the property owners of approximately 3,331 acres of territory located north of the Santa Ana River and easterly of the (b) (c) terminus of Esperanza Road. See page "M" NOTE: The proponents request that fees be paid on 1,508 acres of territory prQposed for urban use based upon the annexation acreage fee in·effect\on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal annual installments commencing one year following annexation, with interest at 6% per ~nnurn; and deferral of acreage fees on the balance of 1,823 acres of open space until service is required for said acreage, at which time annexation acreage fees would be due and payable at the fee in effect at the time service is provided. Presentation by proponents Report of General Counsel (d) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare a report re proposed annexation for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting on July 19, 1978 (32) DISTRICT 2 '...,,,,I Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 I.· I J \ \ / ./ \_ I, ." '- -8- ~ I' ~L/•_-·-\ a1/(.._i.- 1 ",,_. ;JJ V'~ ''""~' ~·~ .. .X BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sa.nitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 9270S Telephones: II of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Area Code 71.C 540·2910 962·2411 AGENDA .MEET I NG DATE JULY 12J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE.CALL THE. MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETI°NG IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Cal 1 (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 2 -June 14, 1978, regular, June 21,' 1978, adjourn~d and June 22, 1978, adJourned · District 3 June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 5 -June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 6 -June 14, 1978; regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 7 June 14, 1978, regular and June 22, 1978, adjourned District 11 -June 14, 1978, regular-and June 22, 1978, adjourned (7) Annual election of Joint Chairman -Nominee: Director Don Saltarelli (8) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman -Nominee: Director Don Fox (9) (10) (11) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS . Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be.regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND · -See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and·. . "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "8" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 -NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 -NONE DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "D" DISTRICT NO. 7 -See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 ·-See page(s) "8" and "D" ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR . ITEMS NOS , 11 (A) THROUGH 11 ( R) All matters plac~d upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and tmless any particular item is requested to be.removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there .will be no separate. discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacte4 by one action approving ·all motions,· and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the . consent calendar •... All items ·removed· ·from the consent calendar· shall be conside~ed in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter· the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * •·• * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be del~ted from. the consent calendar. Consideration of action to ~pprove all agenda ~terns appearing on the consent calendar n.ot specifically removed from same. -2- ,,,-. '-· . r (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-031, to Hooker Chemical Corporation, for the price of .0817 per pound. See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1978-79 fiscal year, and approving payment of annual dues of $1,100 (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Rosswood Industries, Inc. in the amount of $19,375.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-124, authorizing payment of interest earned on invested commingled funds to the fund in which the interest is accrued. See page "F" nsideration of motion authorizing payment to Bird Machine Company 1 t of $7,000.00 for rental of planetary gear unit for use during the re · ·fuge gear box unit at Reclamation Plant No. 1 sludge dewatering (f) Consideration of motion amending Board action of November 9, 1977, authorizing completion of Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, by Districts' force account, and approving increase in the maximum amount for said work from $57,706.00 to $109,200~00. See page "G" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of two surplus District cement mixing trucks in the most cost-effective manner (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-125, authorizing execution of Lease/Purchase Agreement with Envirotech Corp. re evaluation of solids dewatering filter press for Interim Solids Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, in form approved by the General Counsel, for a maximum amount of $10,000. (Up to 87~% of cost to be reimbursed to Districts pursuant to existing agreement with LA/OMA) See page "H" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of Used Grader, Specification No. A-093, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight; and purchase of Used Loader, Specification No. A-094, for an amount not to exceed $40,000 plus tax and freight, to be used for sludge composting operation (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- r (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued ·from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of 12 Cylinder Head Replacement Units I -'• for dual fue 1 gas engines at Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Specificatior~ No. E-094, for an amount not to exceed $20,000 (k) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure necessary contracting services up to $4,500 for pavement repairs, ·house lateral extensions, adjustment of sewer manhole frames and covers and related work from qualified firms inunediately available to . perform said work, without competi ti v.e . bidding, as required by Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a change order to Purchase Order No. 34220 to Haul-Away Containers·, to increase maximum amount from $4,500 to $6,000 for added disposal services required due to storm damages during 1978-79 .DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from R. E. and Terry Hurst for annexation of .607 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, and refer to staff for study and reconunendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 -Hurst Annexation to County Sanl. tat ion District No. 2. See page "I" (n) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-127-2, authorizing "'-" initiation of proceedings to annex 165.676 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-128-2, accepting Grant of Easement from Santa Fe Land Improvement Company for right-of-way in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, at no cost to the District. See page '·J" DISTRICT 5 (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file. and support.the request of Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency, dated June 15, 1978, for all member agencies to vigorously enforce their current provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision developments that are tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. See page "K" DISTRICT 7 (q) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-129-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (11) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-130-7, ordering annexation of 11.027 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 76 -Tract No. 9874 to County Sanitation District No. 7 END ·OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration.of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- / (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing appointment of Director ------to serve as the Districts' representative on the Southern California Association of Governments 208 Program Conunittee, to replace retired Director Frances Wood (14) ALL DISTRICTS Presentation by LA/OMA representative re sludge disposal alternati~es (15) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report re dedication ceremonies for 50 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Status report re continued levy of ad valorem special assessment vs. flat rate special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be collected on the tax roll for funding 1978-79 budgetary requirements (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions in connection with preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, pursuant to 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated June 29, 1978. See page "L" (b) Consideration of motion amending March 8, 1978, Board action to authorize the General Manager to engage the services of consulting firms for the purpose of gathering required information for application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, and increasing the total maximum authorization from $50,000 to an amount not to exceed $125,000 (c) Consideration of motion amending April 12, 1978, Board actions re engagement of consulting services (NOTE: The following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b"): (1) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $15,000 to $20,000 (2) Consideration of motion amending Board action of April 12, 1978, engaging John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment require- ments, on a per diem basis, and authorizing increase in the maximum fee from $7,500 to $45,000 (d) Consideration of actions authorizing engagement of consulting services for the following (NOTE: Tite following services are included in the $125,000 maximum set forth above under "b"): (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal l..,J of J. B. Gilbert & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000 (Item #17 continued on page 7) -6- "-"'' (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (d) (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of K. P. Lindstrom & Associates for services on a per diem fee basis, for a maximum amount not to exceed $8,000 (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract for services with outside laboratories for toxic analysis work, for a total amount not to exceed $25,000 (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to contract with various firms for mapping and drafting services, for a total amount not to exceed $9,500 (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-126, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, to , in the amount of $ -------(See Supplemental Agenda -Bid opening 7/11/78) (19) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplement~! agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 -7- .. l~ (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 35 -Bryant Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from John Wertin Development Corporation, dated June 30, 1978, requesting annexation on behalf of the property owners of approximately 3,331 acres of territory located north of the Santa Ana River and easterly of the terminus of Esperanza Road. See page "M" NOTE: The proponents request that fees be paid on 1,508 acres of territory proposed for urban use based upon the annexation acreage fee in effect on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal annual installments commencing one year following annexation, with interest at 6% per annum; and deferral of acreage fees on the balance of 1,823 acres of open space until service is required. for said acreage, at which time annexation acreage fees would be due and payable at the fee in effect at the time service is provided. (b) Presentation by proponents (c) Report of General Counsel (d) Consideration of motion directing the staff to prepare a report re proposed annexation for consideration by the Board at an adjourned meeting on July 19, 1978 (32) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978 -8- - t · BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitatio n Districts Post Office Box 8127 II of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JO IN T BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JULY 12J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (18) (a-1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specification s for Misce llaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No . 1, Job No . PW-062, providing for a change in the fina l completion date from 45 days to 90 d a ys, and providing tha t the work shall commence within 30 days from the date of the contract (a-2 ) Consideration of Resolution No . 78-126, to r eceive and file bid tabul ation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW -062, to Sully Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $100,180 .00 See pages "I" and "II" (_a-3} Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to the DISTRICT 3 (21) (a) DISTRICT 7 (27) (a) plan s and specifications for r-Iiscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No . 1, Job No. PW -062, authori zing a deduction of $2 1,960.00 from the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company due to . a deletion of bid items 7 and 8 re s idewalk and r amp a t the sludge hopper. See page "III" Consideration of motion app roving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for We stsid e Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Forc e Nain, Second Unit, Contract No . 3-1 3 -1 , clarifying insurance requirements and r evis i ng page 5 of the Propos al re Bid Item No. 8 Con sideration of Standard Resolution No . 78 -131-7, ordering annexation of 1.555 acres of territory to the Distric t in the vicinity of Sky line Drive and La Vereda Drive in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 6 1 -La Vereda Drive Ann exation to County Sanitation Distri ct No. 7 (to a l so be annexed to the 7th Se wer Maintenance District) ... --... II I II RESOLUTION NO. 78-126 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COuNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-062 * * * * *·* * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 6, 7 and 11 of Orange ·County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to SULLY MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY for MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-062, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; a~~, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-062 be awarded to Sully Miller Contracting Company in the total amount of $7,822.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained ·therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract for said work pursuant to the provisions of .the specifica~ions and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. AGE~DA ITEM #18(A-2) -ALL DISTRICTS II I" .... B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N .... S H E E T l --··~ . I JOB NO. PW-062 PROJECT TITLE Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1 -~PROJECT DESCRIPTION Clearing, excavating, hauling, backfilling and compacting the subgrade of the area to he paved. BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------- . l. 2. .3. 4. C0NTRACTOR Sully-Miller Orange, CA R.J. Noble Co. Orange, CA Hardy & Harper, Inc~ Tustin, CA TOTAL BID $100,180.00 $108,783.50 $119,334.00 I have reviewed the bids for Miscellaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062 and found the bid of Sully-Miller Contracting Company of Orange to be the lowest and best bid. I, therefore, recommend award of Job No. PW-062 to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the amount of $100,180.00. z.lJJft./f Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation for award of Job No. PW-062. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer "II" AGENDA ITEM #18{A-2) -ALL DISTRICTS "II" ---_ __.,._... 9<., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (~ ····• . ' ." ... _ CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO ._N_../_A _______ _ C.O. N0. ____ 1 __________________ _ CONTRACTOR: Sully-Miller Contracting Company DATE _______ J __ u_l_y __ l_2~, __ 1_9_7_8 ______ __ JOB: MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 Amount of this Change Order ~ (DEDUCT) $ (21,960.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ~ ... ::}{~ .. · REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dateq July 11, 1978. DEDUCT: At the option of the Sanitation Distr.icts, Bid Items Nos. 7 and 8 are hereby deleted from the contract. Bid Item No. 7 Bid Item No. 8 1,800 S.F. of P.c.c. sidewalk at $2.40/S.F. for a total price of New ramp at sludge hopper for the lump sum price of TOTAL DEDUCT $ 4,320.00 17,640.00 $21,960.00 Ori g i na 1 Contract Pr i ce $_1_0_0_,_1_8_0_._o_o ___ _ Prev. Auth. Changes $ ____ o_._o_o ___ _ This Change (~ (DEDUCT) $_(;....2_1_,_9_60_._o_o_) __ _ Amended Contract Price $ 78,220.00 Board authorization date: July 12, 1978 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY ~y ________________________ __ By-----------~------------------ Contractor Chief Engineer "111-1" AGENDA ITEM #18(A-3) -ALL DISTRICTS "111-1" . . SULLY-MILLER •• ----·..i . /,, .. ·1 (1 r~Lt r::f __._Y~~~·~·:;. ::::::================================= cu 45 SANTIAGO CANYON R0AD"1 P.o:·oox: •'l2'/ ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92669 I (71 4J 639·1400 l714J 547•09711 CONTRACTING CO. "111-2" '78 JUI. 12 Pl2 :~o CS .. :. .. . . ......., . ' . July 11, 1978 Coun~ty SarU..t.atlo n ViAtJuc:IA 01t.a.11g e, Cali6 oJtnia Attn: N.i.c.k ViBenedetto Sen.i.oJt Engi.neeJL Re: AtUc.el.e.a.neoM Paving a:t TJtea:tmen:t Plant # 1 Genil.emen: RegMcli..ng oUJL :telephone c.onvet.~a:Uon. 06 July 12, 197 8 Suil.y-M..ill.C!JL Con:tJc.ac:ting Co. agnee.6 :to pJtoc.eed c-OU.h :ti1e above pJt..ojec.:t WU.h :the knowledge :t/w;t bid Ue.m numbeM .&even and eight may be del.e..t.ed 61t.om oUJt wo1ik. Sinc.Vtely I GM/ag -· AGENDA ITEM #18(A-3) -ALL DISTRICTS "111-2" Gl!Nl:'.RAL l::NCINCER ING CONTRACTOR • SINCF. U>ZJ • ASPHALT 6c ROCK PHOOUCTS MANUFl\CTunr:n MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Di stricts of Orang e County, California JOINT BOARDS Regular Meeting July 12, 1978 -7:3 0 p.m. Pos t Office Box 8127 l 0 844 Ellis Aven ue Foun tain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The fol l owing is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routin e items wh ich appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-expl anatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda materia l swnmarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda materia l and reduce the number of comments in the Manager 's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particul ar ly with regard to change orders and contracts which h ave been publicly bid and are within the contract bud get or e n gine er 's est imate . Detailed c h ange orders are included in the supportin g material as well as the bid tabulations for the con tracts being recommended for award . Joint Boards Nos. 7 & 8 -Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman. Nominations for the positions of Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman were made a t the regular June meeting. There is only one nomin ee for each office; for Joint Chairman, Director Donald Saltarel l i; for Vice Joint Chairman, Director Donald Fox . All Districts Adjournment to July 1 9th -6 :'00 p.m. All Districts will adjourn to 6:00 p.m., July 19th, to conduct a public hearing re proposed flat-rate charge special assessment to be collected on the tax roll for 1978/79 fiscal year . No . 11-a -Awarding Purchase of Soecification No. P-031 . Public bids were taken on June 27th for purchasing caustic soda solution for use at the Odor Control Facilities a t Plants Nos. 1 and 2 for one year beg inning A ;,~us t 20th. Five companies bid, ranging in price from $.0817 per pound to $.0828 per pound. The low bid was submitted by Hooker Chemical of Buena Park, which is 1%c per pound l ow~r than th e current contract price. The staff recommends awa rd to the low bidder. No. 11 -b -Membership in the Santa Ana River F l ood Protection Agency (SARFPA). • The staff is recorrrrnending continued membership in SARFPA. The action appearing in the a8enda authorizes payment of the annual dues of $1;100. This agency 's membership is made up of cities and other public entities within the flood plain of the Santa Ana River, and its objective is to obtain Congressional authority and funds for ne eded improvements to the lUver Basin's flood protection facilities. No.11-d -App!ication of Interest Earned on Invested Comingled Funds. Currently, the interest earned on District -invested comingled County funds is credited to the individual Districts ' Operating Funds. The County Treasurer 's · office has changed their accounting system to permit the application of interest earned to the fund on which the interest is earned. Resolution No. 78 -124 will authorize the County Treasurer to apply the interest earned to the s·pecific funds.. _The staff recorrnnends approval . No. 11 -f -Completion of Foster Outfall Booster Pumping Station, Job No. J-6 -lD. In September, 1974, one·bid was received for the insta llation of two additional pumping units complete with engine drives and gear boxes to be added to the Foster Ocean Outfall Booster Pumping Station at Plant No. 2 . The bid was $1,678,100, which was con - siderably over the engineer's estimate. Based on the staff's recommendation, the Bo?rds rejected the .bid and d i rected the staff to accomplish the work by force account and to negotiate for the p u rchase of proprietary equipment required for the project. Four equipment installation contracts have been awarded in assist ing the Di s tricts to c-0mplete the work as a uthorize d . The project is nearing compl etion and it is estimate.d that the final work, including the Districts ' eng ineering, administration and inspection and overhead, will cost $109,200 (total estimated final cost of $1,586,504 -$91,596 l ess than the reje~ted bid). The staff recommends that the Boards approve the completion cost es timate in order that this project can be finished as soon as possible. No. 11 -g -Surplus C~nent Mixing Trucks . During the late spring and summer of 19 76, Districts ' personnel were processing and composting digested sewag e solids at Plant No. 2. Two used cement mixing trucks were purchased to aid in this operatioh. With the purchase of the additional sludg e ·handling and processing equipment for compostin8 operations offsite, the staff feels that the cement mixers are surplus as they would b e inefficient for trucking sludge any distance . The staff is requesting authority to dispose of the two cement mixing trucks in the mos t cost-effective manner. Present fixed asset value, $8,639 each. -2- No. 1 1 -h -Lease Purchase Agreement for So l ids Dewatering Filter Press. I n the Districts ' efforts to research solids dewatering equipment, two companies have offered, through the LA/O~..A project, belt fi l ter presses which are scheduled to be located at the Districts ' facilities for testing and evaluation. In recent months, discussions have been held with representatives -of the Ralph B . Carter Company and the Envirotech Corporation regarding their respective so l ids dewater- ing equipment. The Envirotech press is a new, yet untested, machine; h owever, special attention was given to the design of the gravity drainage and high pressure zones which, from the LA/OMA studies, i ndicate to be the sensitive areas of a solids dewatering filter press. The staff is request i ng authority to execute a lease pur - chase agreement with Envirotech Corporation for this unit, which i s now available for installation at Plant No. 1. The lease pur- chase will be $1,500 per month, and the staff is requesting an authorization in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for a six-month evaluation period. Under previous authorization, the Districts wil l enter into an agreement with LA/OMA for reimbursement for the renta l fees and the authorized evaluation program to be performed by District personnel. I n the event this unit proves satisfactory, the staff will then report to the Boards as to the feasibility of purchasing the unit and all rental costs would app l y toward the final purchase p rice. No. 11 -i -Au thority to Purchase So l ids Processin g Equipment. As reported to the Directors in J une, the staff is actively engaged i n -securing a more permanent means of disposal for the d igested sewage solids processed at P l ants Nos. 1 and 2. Recent discussions held with the Regional Water Quality Contro l Board, State and County Health Departments, County Solid Waste Manage - ment Division and representatives from The Irvine Company have resulted in concurrence wi th the plan of composting our sludges at the Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill until 1981, at which time the l andfill will be closed and the County 's lease with The Irvine Company will be terminated. After 1981, the staff is pursuing the feasibility of .composting and disposal of our sludges at a future soli d waste disposal site to be operated by the Solid Waste Manage - ment Division in the event the LA/OMA Project has not fo u nd a l o·ng - range solution for our Districts. Composting operations are plann ed to corrnnence no later than October 1 of this year and the staff has been seeking the necessary equipment required for thi s operation. At the June meeting, autho- rization was given for the purchase of a rototiller tractor in an amount not to exceed $5 1 ,000. The staff has located two additiona l -3 - pieces of equipment required for t h e compos t ing oper ation. A u sed grader (blade) and a used loader have been l ocated and are avai l ab l e for purch ase . Th e staff is requesting authority to purchase a u sed grader in an amount not to exceed $40,000 (new unit cost $1 15,000) and a lo ader, also in an amount not to exceed $40,aOO (new price $217,000). No . 1 1 -j -Authori za tion to Purchase Gas Engine Cylinder Heads. Currently we have nine Waukesha dual fuel gas eng i nes for the main sewage pump drives at Plant No. 2. Recent repairs to two of the engines h ave depleted many of the spare pa~ts which are main- tained for emergency, as well as scheduled maintenance on these critical drive units. The staff is requesting authority for the General Manager to negotia te for the purchase of twelve cylinder head replacement units in an amount nol to exceed $20 ,000 . No. il-k -Authorization for Con struction Services for Pavement Repairs, House Lat eral Extensions and Related Work. Under the present purchasing resolution, the staff is required to solicit three competitive bids for services in excess of $500, but less than $4,500. There have been ma ny instances, particularly this past year, where pavement failur es resulting from the heavy rainfall, extensions of house later a l s and oth er related work were not a c complished in a reasonable period of time to minimize the impacts and inconv e niences to the public because extended periods of time were requir ed to secure competicive quota t ions for the work. Many contractors h ave failed to quote cqmpetitively on t his type of work b ecause of the unknowns associated with the repair work. The staff is, therefore, requ est ing authority to secure the most competitive and available contractor to perform pavement repairs, house l atera l extensions, adjustment of manhole frames and covers, and other similar work to minimize the impacts and inconveniences to the public. This authorization wo uld only waive the provision of competitive qt:otations in these in stances and would not change the purchasing resolution with the limitations contained therein . No. 11 -1 -Authorizing Payment for Trash Pick Up Services. Each year , two purchase orders are issued for trash pick up services for the treatment facilities. One is for the customary weekly trash pick up, whi l e the other i s for the ·large trash con- tainers which are used on an as -n eeded basis. During the 1977-78 fiscal year, because of the debris caused by the winter wind and rain storms, the costs associa ted with the containers h ave exceeded t h e staff's -purcha sin g authorization of $4 ,500 . We request authority to increase the purchase order maximum amount from $4 ,500 to $6,000 payable to Haul -Aw a y Containers for lhe 1977-78 fiscal year. -4- District No. 2 No. 1 1-n -Annexation No. 34 -Trac t No. 10011 . Warmin gton Devel opme nt Company a nd The Baldwin Com pany have requested annexat ion of 165.6 76 acres o f t erritory located in the City of Yorba Lin da, n ear the futu re intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive . This matter was r eceived and fi l ed at the June Board mee ting and re ferred to the s t aff for report. Th e City of Yorba Linda approved the EIR on th i s proposed d eve lopment in September of l as t year, a nd have approved the tract map. The proposed development will contain 341 sing le -fam ily units and wil l b e served by the City of Yorba Linda and the Yorba Linda County Wat er District. This development generally conforms to the District's Mas ter P l a n. Th e staff recormnends adopt ion of Reso lution No. 78 -1 27 -2 initiating proceedings for this proposed annexat ion. No. 11-o -Accepting Grant of Easement from Santa Fe Land Company re Contract No . 2-20. The alig nment for the Orcha rd (Kellogg) Subtrunk, extending from La Palma Avenue to Orangethorpe Avenue requires the acquisition of the sewer easement across property wh ich is owned by the Santa Fe Land Co mpa ny. Th e alignment of the sewer will be located in a future street right of way and the Santa Fe La nd Company has offered to grant a sewer easement to the Districts at no cost. Acceptance of this easement is therefore recommended in form approved by the Genera l Coun se l. District No. 5 No. 1 1-P -Request of Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) to Enforce Provisions of Erosion Regu lations. All member agencies of NIWA have been asked to cooperate in the enforcement of reg ula tions for prevention of erosion from sub - division deve lopments tributary to the Upper Newport Bay. While the Sanitation District is not directly involv ed in erosion pre- vention, it is recomm e nded that the Distri ct Board go ort record support i n g the request of the p l anning agency . District No. 7 No. 1 1 -q -I nitiation of Annexation No . 81 -Tract No . 9407 . In June, the Dir ec tors referred to the staff for study and recommendation the appli cation from Ed gewater Development Company for the annexa tion of 6 .218 acres of territory located in the vicinity of Randa l l Street and Kennyrne ad Stree t in the City of Orange. Th e proposed deve lopme nt is for eight sing le -family resi - dence s with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet per lot . This -5 - propos e d dev e l opment has bee n approved b y the City o f Orange, and it is in conformance wi th the Dis tr ic t 's Master Pl a n. The staff r econnnends adop tion of Resolution No. 78 -12 9 -7 , initiat ing pro- c eedings for this annexation . No. 11-r -Or der i ng Annexa tion No . 76. At the February meet~1g , the Board initiated annexation p r o - ceedings for Tract No . 9874 , which i s located in th e vi cinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Sunnymead Street in the Cit y of Or ange . Th e t ract is approximately 11 acres and wi ll contain sixteen sing l e - famil y residences with a minimum lot area of 20 ,0 00 square feet . The proposed develop~ent is in confo rmity to the Districts ' Master Plan for land use and the local sewers wi ll be maintained by the City of Or a nge. The staff therefore reconm1 e n<ls approval of Reso - lu tion No . 78 -1 30 -7, ordering annexation of this parcel to the District. All necessary fees h ave. been p a i d b y the proponent. Joint Boards No. 1 3 -Appointme:it of District Repres enta tive on the SC AG 20 8 Pro gram Co mmittee . Retired Director Frances Wood h as a dvi sed tha t she is resigning h er appointed position representing the Districts on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. Joint Ch ai rman Saltarelli is requesting nomina - t ions f~om active and alternate Board members to fill this vacancy . The 208 planning project is scheduled to be completed in approxi - mate l y 6 months and involves general l y two full days a month in meetings in Los Angeles by our represP.ntative . Denni s Reid, S en ior En gineer of th e Districts ' staff , is usua lly in attendance at the meetin3s and h as represented the appointed Distr ict Director i n the Director 's absence . The Districts ' appo inted representative can receive $50 plus per di~n a nd mil eage for the two f ull days re- quired in Los Angeles each month . No. l fi . -Presentation by LA/OM.A representat ive re Sludge Di s po sa l Alternatives . Th e LA/ 0~1A staff has reques t ed a p lac e on the agend a to make a brief presentation concerning the slud ge d i sposal al t ernat ives t h at have been determined as feasible metho ds for solving the long - range wastewater so l ids disposa l probiem . The LA/Ot1A project i s a r egional wastewater solids management pr ogram for the Los An ge l es/ Orange County ·metropo li tan area, which is funded primarily by the EPA and the California St ate Water Resources Control Boar d. This i s a joint powers study project invo lving the City of Los An geles , Lo s An geles County Sanitation Districts, and our agency . Cu rrently , the slu dge management projects which h a ve b een dev e l oped by th e study are undergoing public review . A LA/OMA representative wi ll make a brief presentation concerning the severa l p rojects that a r e under consid era tion for ultima te development . -6- No. 15 -Arrangements for August 9th Dedication Ceremony. Plans are being made for a brief dedicat ion ceremony and tour of the Districts' new $30 million Improved Treatmen t Faci- lities at Plant No. 1, for 6:30 p.m., preceding the August Joint Board meeting. John Bryson, Chairman of the State Wat~r Resources Control Board and Paul Defalco, Jr., the Environmental Protection Agency 's Regiona l Administrator, will be guest speakers. Because of the timing of the dedication ceremony, a light dinner wil l be served to the Directors immediately preceding the August Joint Board meeting. No. 16 -Status Report on Public Hearing July 19th, for Levy of Flat-Rate So ecial Assessment for Sewer Service. This week, the Di stricts ' staff mailed 408,000 notices to property owners relative to the proposed flat rate assessments for sewer service for the 197 8 -79 fiscal year. Enclosed for the Dire ctors is a copy of the post card notice. As of now, we have no idea as to the public response that may be generated. A verbal status report will be given next Wednesday evening . No additional information is avail- able at this time concern ing the prospects for the Districts to continue the levy of the variab l e ad valorem sp e cial assessment on the t a x bill. - No. 1 7 -Application for Waiver of Secondary Tre atment Require - ments. In March, the Boards authorized the General Ma n ager to engage consultants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purpose of gathering the required information to submit an application to the EPA for wa iver of secondary treatment requirements for marine dis- charge. Subsequently, at the April meeting , the Directors approved initia l work to commence by John Carollo Zngineers, in an amount not to exceed $7,500, and by Southern California Coa stal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) in an amount not to exceed $15,000. The staff has reviewed the EPA regu l ations concerning the application and th e various tasks r equired for the submitta l of the application to b e filed with EPA n o later than September 24 of this year. In- cluded with this agenda material is an itemized, revise d budget in the amount of $125,000. Various tasks r equired in the gather ing of the material have been assigned to those firms and individuals who can best assist the staff in this effort. John Carollo Engin- eers, SCCWRP, Dr . Norman Brooks and Dr. Koh are familiar with the Districts ' operational procedures and are knowled g eable of the effects of the wastewater discharge to the Pacific Ocean . John Carol lo Engineers is also knowledgeable as to the performance of the treatment plant facilities and will assist the staff in pre- paring the effects of the pretreatment pro g rams which affect the indu strial waste segment o f our wastewaters. J. B. Gilbert and As sociates and Kris Lindstrom (a former emp l oyee of J. B. Gilbert) were , and continu e to be , involved in the Districts' EIS -7- preparation and th e secondary i mpacts . Several maps and charts will b e required whic h cannot be done by our staff wit hin the specified time limits . The EPA has r equested a very extensive analysis of the wastewaters to determin e t h e conc entra tion of over 100 toxic compounds. Many of the se co mpounds cannot be a n alyzed by the Di stricts' l aboratory a nd may requir e the services of a n.outside laboratory. The staff feels that this may be an unnecessary requirement in the app lic ~t i on and will continue dis - c u ssing the matte r with EPA officia ls for further clarification . In the even t it i s an effort which must be performed, it is fel t that the analysis must be made by an EPA-approved laboratory. I t is, therefore, the staff 's reco11ID1e ndation that the waiver application budget be approved as submitted and that a uthori zation be given to the consul tants li sted therein in the amounts shown for a total not to exceed $125,000. It i s the staff 's understanding in discussing the preparation of the waiver application with the Ci ty of San Diego and consultants employed by the City of San Fran cisco that their budget amount is in excess of $300 ,000 (Ci ty of Los Angeles, $100 ,000 -Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, $1 25,000). No. 1 8 -Awarding Contra c t for Misce llaneous Paving at Treatment Plant No. 1 -Job No . PW -06 2 . Public bids wi ll be recejved on July 11th for repair, re- surfacing and a sand slurry coating for the asphalt paving at Plant No. 1. This project includes construction of a p u b l ic side - walk on Ellis Avenue easterly of the main entrance to the plant. The engineer 's estimate for the project .is $100,000. The staff will make its recommendations relative to award of a contract at next Wednesday 's meeting . Di strict No. 2 No. 31 -Proposed Annexation No. 35 -Br yant Ranch. J ohn Wertin Deve l opment Corporation has submitted a lett er requesting annexation of approximate ly 3,331 acres (Bryant Ranch) to th e District. Th e territory is l ocated north of the Santa Ana River easterly of the terminus of Esperanza Road . The proponent i s r equesting that fees be paid on 1508 acres based on the annexa - tion acreage fee in effect on June 30, 1978, payable in seven equal installments and an indefinite deferral of annexa tion fees on the balance of 1823 acres which wil l remain as "open space" Because of the size of th e proposed annexation an d the re - quested deviations from the District 's general policy regarding payment of required fees, the staff has invited the proponents to make a presentation to the Directors prior to the preparation of any requested staff report. I f it is determined that the -8- matter is urgen t and ~ust be resolved immediate l y, t h e staff suggests that action on t h e proposed annexation and condition s, if any, could be formally considered at the scheduled adjourned meeting July 1 9th. In the event the Districts' General Counsel and staff are direct e d by the Bo a rd to proceed with workin g out conditions of annex ation next We dn es day, it is the staff 's recommendation that t h e proponent be requested to deposit immediately with the District an add i tiona l $2,000 to defray costs generated by st&ff time for preparing the necessary agreements and the r ecommendation report. Fred A. Harper General Manager -9- •·· .... --.-~ ..... RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JULY ·12j 1978 ~ 7:30 P.M, JOINT ODERATINCi CLAI~1S PAID JUNE 20, 1978 WAllRA.~T NO. JOINT OPERATINf; FIJND l'IARRA.~TS 42065 42066 \.,.) 42067 42068 42069 42070 42071 42072 42073 42074 42075 42076 42077 42078 42079 42080 4iosi 42082 42083 42084 42085 42086 42087 42088 42089 42090 42091 '.,,,.) 42092 42093 42094 42095 42096 42097 42098 42099 42100 42101 42102 42103 42104 42105 42106 42107 42108 42109 42110 42111 42112 42113 42114 42115 42116 ~ 42117 42118 42119 42120 · ·· ·11 A-1" Air California, Air Fare All Seals, Inc., Valve Parts American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Parts Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Truck Parts Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Hilary Baker, Employee Mileage Banning Battery Company, Batteries Benner Sheet Metal, Inc. , Machine Shop Work James Benzie, ··Employee Mileage Black & Decker Mfg. Company, Tool Repair Blue Diamond Materials, Building Materials Don Bogart, Travel Expense Reimbursement W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies Cal.State Seal Company, Lubricants Ca~ Plant Engineering Service, Compressor Repair Case Power & Equipment, Engine Parts Century Fiberglass, Flange Installation Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline Civic Center Lock & Safe, Keys Clark Dye Hardware, Small Hardware College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Controlco, Pump Parts Control Specialists, Inc., Instrumentation Copeland Motors, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts Void Daily Pilot, Employment Ad Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Farr Company, Air Conditioning Parts Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts Foothill Feed Company, Equipment Parts Fountain Valley Camera, Camera and.Photo Processing Fredson, Truck Parts Freeway Machine & Welding, Equipment Repair Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Engine Parts City of Fullerton, Water General Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies General.Telephone Company, Phone Service Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Gould Inc., Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Fittings George T. Hall Company, Pump Parts John Haslett Company, Pump Parts Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Compressor Parts Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease House of Batteries, Batteries City of Huntington Beach, Water Industrial Asphalt, Building Materials J D Packaging & Sales, "fasking Tape Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pump Parts Kelley Blue Book, Vehicle Blue Book AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 64,50 310.56 554.20 193.42 27 .61. 121.50 44.94 652.33 397.50 42.66 39.50 130.50 51.94 27.18 128.92 18.96 288.00 457.79 400.00 1,,883.94 13.30 31. 71 148.34 235.00 5,,620.92 369.38 118.83 44.99 618.68 .oo 38.02 58.30 3,,000.00 247.09 922.48 155.56 268.01 18.85 86.50 105.07 44.27 887.96 4,,295.55 6,,370.00 124.45 22.72 1,215.30 118.46 477.33 819.23 447 .11 10.80 12.34 171. 72 324.95 40.00 II A-1" 'JOINT OPERATING Cl.AIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 42121 42122 42123 42124 42125 42126 42127 42128 42129 42130 42131 42132 42133 42134 42135 42136 42137 42138 42139 42140 42141 42142 42143 42144 42145 42146 42147 42148 42149 42150 42151 42152 42153 42.154 42155 42156 42157 42158 42159 42160 42161 42162 42163 42164 42165 42166 42167 42168 42169 42170 42171 42172 42173 42174 42175 42176 II A-2" King Bearing, Inc., Bearing and Pump Parts $ Kleen-Line Corporation, Hardware Knox Industrial Supplies, Paint Supplies LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Rental Lancaster Upholstery, Mower Bag Larry's Building Materials, Inc., Building Materials Laursen Color Lab, Film ·processing Lewco Electric Company, Starter Repair Long Beach Safety Council, Safety Pamphlets McBain Instruments, Lab Supplies McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Hardware and Tools Mar Vac Electronics, Welding Supplies Paul A. Mitchell, Employee Mileage Moore Pro9ucts Company, Engine Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Cover Motorola, In~., Conununications Equipment Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals· National Academy of Sciences, Science Manual National Lumber Supply, Building Materials O'Rings, Inc., O'Rings Orange County Employees Retirement System, OCERS Transfer Balance Orange County Farm Supply Company, Landscape ,.Supplies M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauge Jose Pena, ~\feed Abatement B. Dalton Pickwick, Techinal Books Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Productool, Inc., Tools Pyramid Fence Company, Fence Parts Quality Building Supply, Building Materials Quality Typewriter Maintenance, Office Supplies Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Safety Research Corporation, Paint Supplies Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Seal Black Company,· Inc., Building Materials Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies Sight Optical Sales, Equipment Repair Sims Industrial Supply, Industrial Supplies South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings Southern California Edison, Power Southern California Gas Company, Gas Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Stang Hydronics, Inc., Freight Starow Steel, Steel Bars The Suppliers, Tools and Hardware Surveyors Service Company, Building Materials Travel Buffs, Air Fare Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges United States Equipment, Inc., Pump Parts AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 792.17 1s4.3sv 219.79 810.84 1,192.28 45.90 45.05 60.42 68.00 33.76 84.51 513.28 105.79 18.46 146.18 229.86 3.46. 94 1,439.78 21.45 205 .11 28.85 7,735.44 479.96 135.94 300.00 339.15 3s1.21v 15.90 16.22 95.19 275.60 24.33 . 83. 70 72.90 245.36 90.95 17.39 474.53 58.90 5.SO 69.32 34.92 136.00 212.00 208.40 55,811.03 1,325.76 192.26 46.54 939.37 87.55 12 8 • 2 6 't-. . J 894 .80....., 634.86 13.42 1,579.85 "A-2 11 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 42177 42178 ~ 42179 42180 42181 42182. 42183 42184 42185 42186 42187 42188 42189 42190 42191 42192 42193 42194 • 42195 II A-3" University Sales & Service, Truck Parts VBA Cryogenics, Lab Supplies· Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Valley Towing, Vehicle Tow Valvate Associates, Valve Parts VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Vehicle Spring Service, Truck Repair Walker & Reobuck Company, Small Tools John R. Waples, Odor Control Waukesha Engine .Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Electronic Supply Corporation, Electrical Supplies Western Salt Company, Lab Salt Western Wholesale Company, Truck Parts Milton D. Winston, Employee Mileage Wood Fumigation & Termite Control, Fumigation Thomas L. Woodruff, General-Counsel . Worthington Service Corporation, Machine Repair Xerox Computer &ervices, Computer Service Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 63.71 45.79 1,030.19 50.00 403.34 113.76 103!60 75.26 219.50 159.59 277 .27 126.94 75.97 32.94 1,875.00 4 )501. 00 1,209.67 10,551. 98 2,379.45 $ 136,345.50 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID .JUNE 20, 1.978 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING Fl'ND l'lARP.A.lITS 42058 42059 42060 42061 42062 . 42063 42064 II A-LI II Butier Engineering, Inc., Contract Management P2-23 Eastman, Inc., Office F~rniture · Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing P2-23-6 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Revenue Program Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Equipment Southern California_ Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-5 Taylor-Dunn, Electric Carts TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATIN~ & CORF AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS ·AMOUNT $-10,189.75 \.,.)" 989.95 1,400.00 7,829.14 2,020.49 52.50 .. 8, 087. 76' $ 30,569.59 $ 166,915.09 II fl.-4 II INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 ~ WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF State of California, Annex 21 Processing Fee 42045 42046 Shapell Industries; Inc., Annex 21 Processing Fee O'Pymt TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED:t:APITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 42047 42048 John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contract 2-SR The Registe~, Legal Ad, Carbon Canyon EIR TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 42049 42050 Ador/Hilite, Use Charge O'Pymt Charles C. Regan Company, Asphalt Repairs TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 42051 42052 "B-1" Boyle Engineering Corporation, Design Engr. Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing 3-20-3, TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 3-20-3, 3-22 .... 1 AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS 3-22-1 $ $ AMOUNT 290.00 110. 00 400.00 AMOUNT $ 17,536.50 31.36 $ 17,567.86 "$ 17,967.86 AMOUNT $ 1,630.80 3,485.00 $ 5,115.80 AMOUNT $ 10,173.89 2,922.50 $ 13,096.39 $ 18,212.19 "B-1" , WARRANT NO. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 20, 1978 IHSTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF ~OUNT 42055 42056 State of California, Annex 70, 71, 72, and 74 Processing Fee'$ 430.00 Clifford A. Forkert, Aerial tiaps 1,085.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WA..mwff NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 42055 42056 Lemon Heights, A Jt. Venture, Annex 71 0 1Pymt Glen R. Nelson, Annex 74 O'Pymt TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 42057 The Register, Leg.al' Ad, Coastal J>ermi t Hearing TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 11 ACO FUND "B-2" AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS .> $ 1,515.00 AMOUNT $ . 198 .02 98.46 $ 296.48 -·- $' 1,811.48 AMOUNT $ 243.20 $ 243.20 "B-2" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS I._/ 42280 42281 42282 42283 42284 42285 42286 42287 42288 42289 42290 42291 42292 42293 42294 42295 42296 42297 42298 42299 42300 42301 42302 42303 42304 \.,,I 42305 42306 42307. 42308 42309 42310 42311 42312 42313 42314 42315 42316 42317 42318 42319 42320 42321 42322 4.2323 42324 42325 42326 42327 42328 42329 '..rt' 42330 42331 42332 42333 42334 "C-1" A & A Refrigeration Company, Air Conditioning Repair All Seals, Inc., Pump Parts American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts Anaheim Electric Motors, Motor Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Repairs Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies BPI -Business Publishers, Inc., Sludge Journal L.W. Bemis Tractor ~ Implements, Generator Parts Benz Engineering, Inc., Gaskets Berkley Controls, Inc., Electrical Supplies Blue Diamond ~1aterials, Concrete Bomar:.: Magneto Service, Inc. , Magneto Parts Building News, Inc., Office Supplies CS Company, Engine Parts Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Company, Small Hardware Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies California Auto Collision, Inc., Vehicle Repair John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, Re Waiver R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Compressor Products, Valve Repair Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies· Costa ~iesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Water District, Water County Sanitation Districts, Workers Comp. Trust Fund. Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crane Systems, Truck Bed Curtin ~~atheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daily Pilot, Employment Ad Deco, Electrical Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drilling Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware The Foxboro Company, Electrical Supplies Frost Engineering Service Company, Pump Parts GW Maintenance, Inc., Drain Tanks General Telephone Company, Phone Service ~oldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Gould, Inc., Warren & Baily Division, Gauges Halsted Fr Hoggan, Inc., Hydro Pump Harbor Radiator, Fire Extinguishers Harrington Industrial-, Piping Hertz Car Leasing Division, Mileage Hilti Fastening Systems, Hardware House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Pipe Fittings City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Truck Rentals Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Kelly Pipe Company, Valve King Bearing, Inc., Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies LRWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Rental AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 594.22 22.26 627.01 520.04 1,520.00 203.86 10.00 127.79 285.31 127.20 127.28 89.57 122.86 494.17 36.86 9.99 359.70 406.00 17.40 2, 274 .. 20 98.37 435.75 389.67 487. ll 6.00 5,000.00 492.00 530.00 137.63 101. 79 291.05 65.00 182.58 97.07 222.92 159.54 32.00 385.40 7,588.75 194.21 861.75 431. 42 101. 61 31.49 250.59 247.09 834.01 10.13 151.14 2.75 286.00 873.65 303.79 256.80 1,245.85 "C-1" . ,,-~ . -<. () :JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 42335 42336 42337 42338 42339 42340 42341 42342 42343 42344 42345 42346 42347 42348 . 42349 42350 42351 42352 42353 42354 42355 42356 42357 42358 42359 42360 42361 42362 42363 42364 42365 42366 42367 42368 42369. 42370 42371 42372 42373 42374 42375 42376 42377 42378 42379 42380 42381 42382 42383 ·42384 42385 42386 42387 42388 42389 42390 ·42391 "C-2u Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts Lawson Products, Inc., Truck Parts Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Safety Supplies Los Angeles Chemical Company, Chemical Weed Killer Los Angeles Times, Employment Ad McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts McGee Mfg. Company, Inc. , Grit Diffusers Mcl1aster-Carr Supply Company, Small Tools National Electrical Mfg. Association, Service Manual City of Newport Beach, Plant Water Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Service Pak West, Maintenance Supplies Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges ., Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Lawn Hainte~an~e.Equipment Pickwick Paper Products, Paper Supplies Pitney Bowes, Postage Meter Polyspede, Power Supply Postmaster, Postage Power Systems, Filters Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Productool, Inc., Small Tools The Pryor Giggey Company, Building Materials Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Steel Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Sande Equipment Company, Pump Parts. Saylors Artist & Engineering Supply, Engineering Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies See Optics, Safety Glasses Shepherd Machinery Company, Machine Repair Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies Simpson-Steppat, Santa Ana River Crossing Plans South Orange Supply, Pipe Supplies Southern California Edison, Power Void Southern California Water Cornapny, Water Starow Steel, Steel Stock State Compensation Insurance Fund, Quarter Premium Super Chem Corporation, Solvent The Suppliers, Small Hardware Tarby Engineering, Pump Parts Tektronix, Inc., Electrical Supplies 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Stakes Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Locks Tools for Industry; Small Tools Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Company of California,· Gasoline United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Warren McVeigh & Griffin, Insurance Consultation Fee Waukesha Engine Scrvicenter, Engine Parts Westinghouse Electric Corporation, New Motor AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 49.12 210.52 v 428.90 384.25 300.00 110. 77 662.50 19.60 28.00 31.17 318.16 74.03 911.57 79.74 57.05 36.29 39.75 297.43 1,000.00 171.43 31.80 64.72 1,094.03 310.22 175.20 74.56 119.32 ~ 135.98 23.32 137.75 602.54 288.99 435.36 40,158.94 .oo 6.26 234.95 14,800.00 1,312.55 45.79 58. 72 9.59 69.96 48.97 55.07 199.28: 331.13 42.49 18.17 915.69 291.71 33,60 v 430.53 1,357.10 1,467.57 2,470.52 1,698.04 "C-2" ·WARRANT NO. 42392 . '.._,/ 42393 JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 JOINT OPERAT!Nf; FUND WARRANTS Westinghouse Supply Company, Charts Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies $ !\"10UNT 263.07 375.05 ·-·· --·------···--·--·----··--··------------------··-·--·--·-·· ------. ---·---···--·-·---- TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 106,159.45 . ..._,.,. "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS . "C-3" WARRANT NO. 42268 42269 42270 42271 42272 42273 42274 42275 42276 42277 42278 42279 "C-4" 30INT DIST~ICTS CLAIMS PAID _JUNE 30, 1978 "CAPITAL OtITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS John Carollo Engineers, Pl-16 Instr. Program John Carollo Engineers/Greeley Hansen, Constr. Serv •. P2~23 Forkert Engineering, Engineering PW-067 Global Engineering, Spec P2-23-6 Hallmark Business Interiors, IW Partitions C. H. Leavell & Comoany, Contract P2-23-3 McFarland Partition;, Administrative Office Partitions Parts Unlimited, Washer Tank Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2~23-6 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-5 Southwest Sewer Equipment, A-084 Sewer Clean TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #10 ALL DISTRICTS .AMOUNT $ 1,279.04 41,355.33 2,006. 75 u. 6.36 295.21 569,285.60 1,915.00 2,010.82 143,145.05 238,210.20 170.79 37,975.56 $1,037,655.71 $1,143,815.16 "C-4" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 .DISTRICT NO. 2 ACClP.filLATEn CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF I._,! 42253 Lowry and Associates, Engineering 2-SR, 2-19 and 2-20 WARRANT NO. 42254 WARRANT NO. ~ 42255 42256 42257 WARRANT NO. 42261 42262 42263 42264 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Anaheim Sewer Construction, Los Alamitos Sewer Repair . TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF Korkick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., Contract 3-22-1 Sladden Engineering, Compactio~ Testing 3-20 and 3-22 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 7 FIXED OBLIGATIONS IN FAVOR OF City of Anaheim, Oil Royalties City of Fullerton, Oil Royalties City of Orange, Oil Royalties City of Santa Ana, Oil Royalties TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #10 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 2,962.97 $ 2~962.97 AMOUNT $ 2, 941.80 $ 2,941. 80 AMOUNT $ 390,955.84 162,672.44 1,390.00 $ 555,108.28 $ 557,960.08 AMOUNT ~ 541.30 541.30 541.31 541.31 $ 2,165.22 "D-1" ·WARRANT NO. 42265 WARRANT NO. 42266 42267 WARRANT NO. 42258 42259 42260 "D-2" 'INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 30, 1978 ·DISTRICT NO. 8 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF State of California, Dissolution Fee TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 8 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF Long Beach Independent, LegaI·~~Ad .Coast Hwy Trunk Hearing The Register, LegaI·Ad·Coast Hwy Trunk Hearing TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND IN .. FAVOR OF Daily Pilot, Legal Ad, Santa Ana River Siphon Portigal & Hammerton, Litigation 5-19 Rodding-Cleaning Machines, Inc., Contract 5-8-R TOTAL DISTRICT 5 & 6 SUSPENSE AGENDA ITEM #10 ALL DISTRICTS , AMOUNT $ $ $ $ $ $ 95.00 95.00 AMOUNT 154.62 55.78 210.40 AMOUNT 65.25 850.00 22,335.88 23,251.13 \..J "D-2" "E" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 June 29,, 1978 044 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Sylvester FROM: Ted Hoffman SUBJECT: Bid Speci:fication ·p-·031·, ·cau·s·t'i:c· Soda Sealed bids were opened June 27,, 1978, for furnishing & delivery of caustic soda solution to Plants 1 and 2 for one (1) year. Starting August 20, 1978, net prices are shown in dry pounds which are converted into· liquid gallons for delivery. The tabulations are· ·a·s 'fo.ll'ows: Company City Deliveries of Deliveries of Hooker Chemical Co · ·1 2·0-00-·g·aTl'ons .0817 lb · ·4· 2·0·0-0-·gaTlons .0817 Buena Park lb L. A. Chemical South Gate .08717 " .08717 Stauffer Chemical Los Angeles .0884 " .0872 McKesson Chemical Los Angeles .0821 1f .082i Van Waters & Rogers Los Angeles .0828 " .0817 It is recommended that the award be made to the low bidder, Hooker Chemical Company, for their low bid price of $.0817 per pound. The new bid price is $.0156 per pound lower than current contract price. " " " " There is an option for renewal of contract for one year after first .year agreement in accordance with provisions listed in contract clause. pendi £es £or one year based on estimated usage is $25,000. !. 4. - Ted E. Hoffman Chief of Procurement & Property TEH/yh AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "E" "F" RESOLUTION NO. 78-124 AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF INTERESTS EARNED ON COMMINGLED INVESTMENTS TO APPROPRIATE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHO- RIZING PAYMENT OF INTERESTS EARNED ON COMMINGLED INVESTMENTS TO THE FUND CONTAINING THE PRINCIPAL ON WHICH SAID INTEREST IS EARNED * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the existing state· law requires that interest on moneys deposited in a depositary by an officer of a local agency belongs to, and shall be paid quarterly into, the general fund of the local agency, unless otherwise directed by law; and, WHEREAS, recently adopted Assembly Bill No. 2376 provides that notwith- standing such provisions of existing law, except as otherwise directed by law, that if the governing body of the local agency so directs, interest on moneys deposited shall be paid to the fund which contains the principal on which the interest is accrued, NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to direct County Treasurer to pay interest earned on Districts' commingled funds to the fund which contains the principal on which said interest is accrued. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #ll(n). -··ALL DISTRICTS "F" "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 IOS.C<4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 5<40-2910 (71-4) 962-2<4 II June 2.~, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Completion of J-6-1 Work Attached is the current estimated cost of completing J-6-1. When the work done on this job is complete, the predicted total amount spent will be $1,586,504 compared to $1~6?8·,100 which Bovee and Crail bid on the job in 1974. Compared to the bid price, which includes no Districts' inspection and burden time, the predicted estimate includes money for Districts' engineering and burden plus money for a number of additions which have been built into the job since the original J-6-1 was bid. These additions include: · 1. Having 50-inch pumps installed instead of the 42-inch pumps specified originally. 2. Having larger right angled gear drives installed for the increased thrust from the bigger pumps. ·3. Due to the concern of the Districts' staff and that of the engine supplier, a 30-inch structural steel skid was added beneath each engine to better distribute the engine load on the second floor of Foster Station. 4. The addition of the structural steel skid necessitated the elevation of the roof. The structure of which has been completed. 5. Purchasing fiberglass ventilators in lieu of aluminum ones. Recent experience at the 11 C11 Headworks has shown that aluminum ventilation systems deteriorate rapidly in the salt air environment of Plant No. 2. The project is at this time operational on natural gas and was used during the past winter to prevent heavy storm loads from having to be discharged into the Santa Ana River. Incorporation of the items shown on the completion cost estimate will permit pump operation on digester gas, the weatherproofing, and finishing of the Foster Station and general operation in a nominal fashion. AGENDA ITEM #ll(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" "G-2" Ray E. Lewis June 28, 1978 Page Two It is recommended that the Districts allocate the funds indicated to complete the J-6-1 project. DB:ss Donald Bogart Senior Engineer AGENDA ITEM #ll(F) -ALL DISTRICTS ' ~- "G-2" J-6-1 Completion Cost Estimate 1. Engine Hatches (stucco side walls) 2. Roofing 3. Sheet Metal Roofing Material Digester Gas Piping 4. Concrete Work s. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12·. 13. 14. 15. 16. "G-3" Pipe Supports and Slabs Tunnel Covers South Wall Repai~ Install Lube Oil Tank Accoustical Repair Wetwell Fiberglass Vent Pipe Thermal Insulation Tubing, .Engines to Control Panels Install Wall Panel at South End of ~uilding Remodel Walls where Block is not Complete Districts'·Time & Material to Complete Sub-Total Districts' Engineering, Administration and Inspection Districts' Vehicles Districts' Dept. 30, 50, 60.& 90 Burden .. Total AGENDA ITEM #ll(F) -ALL DISTRICTS $ 2,000.00 15,000.00 4,500.00 15,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 ·500. 00 1,000.00 10,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 20,000.00 $ 85,500.00 9,700.00 2,800.00 11,200.00 $109,200.00 "G-3" "H" . RESOLUTION NO. 78-125 APPROVING FILTER PRESS LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILTER PRESS LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH ENVIROTECH CORPORATION FOR RE-EVALUATION OF SOLIDS DEWATERING FILTER PRESS * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain.Lease/Purchase Agreement· dated -------- by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 and Envirotech Corporation re evalu- ation of solids. dewatering filter press for solids handling facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted. Section 2. That payment for lease of said filter press is hereby authorized ~ at $1500 per month plus tax and fre.ight for a maximum amount not to exceed $10,000. Section 3. That exercise of a purchase option for said filter press be subject to the prior approval of these Boards of Directors. Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, be and are hereby authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regillar meeting held July 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM·#ll(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "H" . . "EXHIBIT A" PETI'l'ION FOR 1\NNJ~XJ\TION '...I Date: To: Board of Directors County Sanitotion District No. 2.. P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection - Example: in the city of Orange, near. the int rsec~io of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) ~.<,;;;;:~~zt..~......c:::i..d~~.::.!::::::!:::::~z:..__u.:;t....:---k~~~~~-...~ and more particularly and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: .. . -~ :· .. ,~/:\.: Pro erty Owner (If more .than listing) Name: Address: City & State: Telephone No.: ((, 32 -d./ (p d:: Gross Acreage: 0. '2 C) <{ (to nearest hundredth) Asse?,sed Value (If more than one parcel, attach separate listing) 4Z/> 'Cf 6 tr 6 0 .. () 0 Number of Registered Voters: Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report if prepared). Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. Signature of Property Owner(s) II I II AGENDA ITEM #11CM~)_-~D~l~ST~R~IC~T~2~~~~~~~11 l_"_ II J" RESOLUTION NO. 78-128-2 AU11IORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-20 A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVE- MENT COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITii CONSTRUCTION OF ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County.Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated ,.. . . - wherein a permanent easement in the vicinity westerly of Orchard between .La Palma and Orangethorpe for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, is hereby accepted from the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exh:i.bi ts ''A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20; and, Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and, Section .s. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be authorized and directed to records said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #ll(o) -DISTRICT 2 II J" Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency Lansing E. Eberling, Chairman Donald A. Mcinnis, Vice Chairman Alexander Bowie, Secretary Warren 0. Fix, Treasurer City of Costa Mesa City of Irvine City of Newport Beach City of Orange County of Orange Orange County Flood Control District Orange County Harbors. Beaches & Parks District Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 Irvine Ranch Water District Orange County Water District California r -rtment of ~ndGame "K" June 15, 1978 Honorable Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attn: Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary Dear Members of the Board of Directors: NI 952.7 At its meeting of May 25, 1978, the Board of Directors of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA) unanimously approved a motion that each of its member agencies be formally requested to vigorously enforce its current provisions for prevention of erosion from subdivision deve~opments ·that are triJ;mtary to Upper Newport Bay. As you are aware, NIWA, as part of the 208 Planning activities in the South Coast Area, ~s preparing a report on the adequacy of existing administrative controls for the. prevention of excessive runoff-related soil erosion from construction and agricultural activities in jurisdictions tributary to the San Diego Creek and Upper Newport Bay. While it is anticipated that recommendations will be developed from these reports for strengthening present ordinances and controls, the NIWA Board of Directors believes that your cooperation at this time to see that existing provisions are actively enforced will be a first step in protecting the Newport Bay from the effects of such activities. Very truly yours, NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PLANNI~ENCY . By L. 0 E. c~J;airman, Board of Directors LEE/lac cc: Board of Directors, NIWA Friends of Newport Bay 61 O Newport Center Drive, Suite 1220 Newport Beach, California 92660 714/644-9311 AGENDA ITEM #ll(p) -DISTRICT 5 "K" .... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 29, 1978 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.0.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)S4~2910 (714)962·2411 ST AF F REPORT PREPARATION OF APPLICATION.FOR.WAIVER OF SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS At the March and April meetings, the Boards authorized the General Manager to engage consultants to assist the staff in the preparation of the application to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for waiv.er of secondary treatment requirements for marine discharge. The staff has reviewed the EPA requirements and has discussed the appli- cation with the Districts' consultants .and with other agencies who are concurrently P.reparing their waiver application. Task assignments have been made for the various elements required by the EPA and it is ·estimated that outside services required will be approximately $125,000 sununarized as follows: · · GENERAL .TASK ASSIGNMENT Physical assessment, initial dilution, ocean discharge Ocean discharge, marine bio- logical assessment Review of biological assess- ments & assist in preparation of application Overall coordination & prep- aration of application Initial dilution & plume discharge Toxic analysis Mapping, drafting . "CONSULTANT Carollo SCCWRP Gilbert Lindstrom · Norm Brooks Robert Koh Outside Lab Various PREVIOUS MAXIMUM AUTHOR!-FEE .. ·z·ATION . "REQUIRED $ 7,500. $ 45,000. 15,000. 20,000. o. 10,000. o. 8,000. 4,500. 4,500. 3,000. 3,000. o. 25;000. o. 9,500. $125, 000. \..._) It is necessary that the in order to finalize the line of September 24th. Manager be authorized to maximum fees set forth. tasks assigned be completed before September 1st application to submit to the EPA before the dear- It is the staff's recommendation that the Gene~ engage the consultants as listed herein for the "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" . . . Staff Report June 29, 1978 Page Two It ·is the staff's understanding that other agencies working on waiver applications have obligated funds in excess of the Districts' budget. San Francisco, as an example, has contracted for over $300,000 for outside services to assist their staff, and similarly, the City of San Diego has contracted for approximately $300,000, also for outside services of consultants. REL:hj_b "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" "M-1" john Wert in Development Corporation Mr. Fred Harper General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: June 30, 1978 We hereby request that the County Sanitation District No. 2 Board of Directors consider at their July 12, 1978 meeting the attached Annexation Agreement for the purpose of annexing the property known as the Bryant Ranch consisting of approximately 3,331 acres located in northeast Orange County north of the Santa Ana River and easterly"of the terminus of Esperanza Road. A legal descrip- tion and preliminary title report ·are enclosed for your information. A legal description to comply with your requirements is being prepared by VTN and should be completed by the end of nex~ week. The following additional information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request: The current property owners are: Ernest A. Bryant, Jr. & Ernest A. Bryant, III, as Co-Trustees under the Will of Susanna Bixby Bryant, and Susanna Dakin Arp, Henry S. Dakin, and Samuel Dana Dakin. Their address is: c/o Rancho Santa Ana 23850 Esperanza Road Anaheim, California 92686 Their telephone number is: (714) 970-8771 2081 Business Center Drive Suite 200 Irvine, California 92715 714-833-3331 AGENDA ITEM #31 -DISTRICT 2 "M-1" L ..... .'../ "M~2" Mr. Fred Harper COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.2 Page·two June 30, 1978 John Wertin is the holder of an option on the property. The current owners have agreed to consent to the annexation upon the finalization of the Annexation Agreement. If you require a letter from the owners verifying this, please advise. Attached is a list of Assessor's Parcels involved and the assessed value (1977-78). There are six registered voters on the property (only one with ownership). Also enclosed is the Initial Study, a copy ·of an Environmental Impact Report, and a check in the amount of $500. We would further request that copies of any correspondence relating to this matter be directed to the undersigned. If you require any additional information to place this matter before the Board, please give me a call. JAS:jsg cc: Mr. Ernest A. Bryant, III David Colgan, Fulop, Rolston, Burns & McKittrick Very truly yours, AGENDA ITEM #31 -DISTRICT 2 "M-2" ALTERNATIVE II ~0 AGENDA ITEM NO. Sb Establishing F l at Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service and Irrunediate Availability to be Collected on the Tax Roll u u { ) 'WI LEGAL OPINION .W L J 'WI Repor.t Requir.ed By Section 5473 ... of the Health and Safety Code REPORT RE SEWER SERVICE FEES -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P REFACE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of O RANGE C OUNTY. C ALIFORNIA P O.BOX 8127 108 44 ELLIS AVENUE FO UNTAIN VAL LE Y , CAL IFORNI A 92708 (714 )540·2910 (714) 962·2411 This report is prepared pursuant to the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Secti on 5473. The purp ose o f said report is to give public notice of the intent of the County Sanitation Districts to consider the adoption of an Ordinance that will prescribe fees and charges for sanitary sewer services provided by the Districts and to be charged to respective parce l s of property wi thin the territoria l juris- d i ction of the Districts. This report contains a description of each parcel of real property that wi l l receive the service s of the Districts and have access to utilization of the facilities, said parcels of real property b e ing describe d by reference to maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the California Revenue and Taxation Co d e and on file i n the off ice of the County Assessor , with copies on file in the office of the Clerk of t h ese Districts . Additionally , this report sets forth the am o u nt of the charge for each parcel for fiscal year 1978 -79 . The Ordinanc e under consideration by the governing Board of Directors of th e se Districts wi l l provide revenues which shall b e used only for the acquisi t ion , construction , reconstruction , main tenance and operation of sanitary sewer facilities , and s h a ll not be used for the acquisition or construction or mainte- n ance of new local street sewers or lateral s as disting uishe d fro m main trunk, i nterceptor and outfall sewers provided by these Districts . I f the proposed Ordinance is adopted , the l egislative a u t h ori ty may elect to have such charges for the forthcoming f i s c a l year co llected on the tax ro ll in the same manner , by the same persons, and at the same time as , together with a nd n o t separatel y from , the genera l taxes of these Districts and the County of Orange . At the time stated in the notice setting the public hearing on t his report , the g overning Board of Directors shall hear and cons i der a l l objections or protests , if any , to said report r eferred to i n said notice , and may cont inue the h earing fro m time to time . DATED : June 22 , 1 978 Thomas L . Woodru ff , General Counse l Supporting Material for Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service and Immediate Availability Charge .L\LL DISTRICTS PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESS~1Ern FOR SE'AER SERVI CE & If·i~lED I ATE AVA I LAB IL I TY 1978-79 Estimat e d Operating & Ca pital Re quireme nts District (Coll e ction Syste m) Construction & Res e rves Joint Works (Tre atme nt Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Res e rves Joint Op e rating (Tre atme nt Pl a nt) Exp e nse District Operating & Other Ex penditure s Distribute Upp e r Ba s in Joint Works Equity to othe r CSD's TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extend e d Re ve nu e Federal -State Grants Sale of Cap a city Right s Connection Fe es & Indu s trial Use r Charg e s Inter es t & Mi s c. Incom e Other Carry-over TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be r a i sed by Assessme nt y im a ted Number of Pa rcel s in the "1'"1s trict ~--~ 400,560 Es timat e d Annual Fl a t Ra t e Spec i a l Assessmen t for Sewe r Se rvi ce & imm e di a t e a vc:i il a bi I ity 77-78 41,662,824 61,058,000 6,817,884 7,009,700 116,548,408 14,152,000 660,000 3,858,ooo 3,629,637 3,003,000 71,836,318 97,138,955 19,409,453 ("' 78-79 25,933,200 85 ,075 ,000 8, 153,000 8,548,800 1 '141 '000 128,85 1,000 13,759,000 1 '213 '000 4,236,000 3,517,000 1,500,000 87,461,000 l 1 l '636 '000 17,165,000 '7. cJ '1-.;~~ I/I I ::(1 .. ~ Z. Increase (Decr e ase) . (15,729,624) 24,017 ,000 l ,335, 116 1,539, 100 1 '141 '000 12,302,59 2 393,000) 553,000 378,000 ( 112,637) ( l ' 50 3 '000) 15,624,682 ]11' 547 '045 (2,244,45 3) ($42~Jp e r parc e l · (Av e r age ) ' .. J I' . I 6/2 2/78 COUN TY SANI TAT ION DISTRICT NO. (A LL ) PR ELI MINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FL OW OPE RAT I NG & CAPITAL Oll L Y (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCA L YEARS 78-79 THROU GH 82 -83 DES CRIPTI ON 78-79 79 -80 80 -81 8 1-82 82 -8 3 J - <f'> '\ r CARRY -O VER FROM PREV IO US FISCAL YEARS $ 87 ,461,000 $ 76,830,000 $ 70 '2 77 '000 $ 60 '969 '000 $39,335,000 REvrnuE Assessme nt a t $ /parce l 17, 165 , 000 17, 165,000 17' 165,000 17,165 ,000 17 ' 165,000 S(~ ~ Ot he r Revenue Federal & State Pa r ti c ipa t i on 13,759,000 18,749,000 30,583,000 36,063,000 29,56 3,000 'J ~ '1 Loan in Aid o f Const rue t i on 1 ,150,000 ( , J / Sa l e o f Cap a city Ri ghts 1 ,213 ,000 73,000 73,000 73 ,')00 73,00 0 I.-:, Fees 4 ,236,0CO 3,697,000 3 ,491 ,000 3 ,232,000 2,857,000 r ( Mi see 11 aneou s 3.867,000 3,066,000 2,798,000 2,4351000 11557 1000 (~.'7 TOT AL FUNDS AVA i LAB LE $128,851,000 $119,580 ,000 $124,387 ,000 $119,937 ,000 $90,550,000 EX?ENDI TURES District Cons tr uct ion $ 10,868 ,ooo $ 5,577,000 $ 4,054,000 $ 6, 163 ,000 $ 2,999 ,000 ;. J ,, Share of Joint Wo r ks Co nstruct i o n 29,639,000 30,434,000 43,048,ooo 50,61 8 ,000 38.213,000 /(', <) Rep a y Lo a n in Aid of Construction 200,000 zou,uuo 200,000 200,000 200,000 I . v Refunds of Cap ita l Cost Recovery to Fede ral Tr easury 1 , 141,000 100 ,000 100,000 100,000 335,000 I I' Share of Joint Ope r at in g 8, 151 ,000 10,667 ,000 13,343,000 20 ,448,ooo 26 , 118,ooo -:J. Distr i ct Ope r at i ng & Other Expendit u res 2 022,000 2,325,000 2 ,673 ,000 3 ,073 ,000 3,533.000 . "3 . ' TOTA L EXPEN DITURES $ 22 ,02 1 ,ooo $491 303 10 00 $ 6 3 • 4 1 8 • 000 $ 80 ,602. 000 $ 7 1 • 3 98 • 000 -I', ~ Carry-Over Balance t o Fo l lowing Fi sca l Yea r $ 76,830,000 $ 70,277 ,000 $ 60 ,969,000 $39.33 5 ,000 $ 19 . 1 52 • 000 ,r. Funds Necessary t o Mee t Co ~ro it men ts Pri o r to 7, ") Receipt of Tax Appor t io nments 24,6 53,000 32,210,000 40,303,000 35.700,000 35 .700 ,000 ~\ Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ s2. 1 ZZ • ooo $ ~8 ,o6z ,ooo $ 201666 z 000 $ 3.635,000 ($16.548,000).:.._ t:.!} DISTRICT NO. l PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPEC I AL ASSESS~1Ern FOR SE'~ER SERVI CE & IfriMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extended Re v enue Federal-State Grants Sale of Capacity Rights Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges Interest & Misc. Income Carry-over TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be raised by Assessment Estimated Number of Parcels in the 'strict Estimated Annual Fl a t Rate Special Assessme nt for Sewe r Service & imm e diate avail a bility 34,_155 77-78 900,000 6,566,564 789,511 607,450 8,863,525 1,234,000 32,000 234,000 410,300 5,656,452 7,566,752 1,296'773 78-79 638,000 7,075,000 924,000 747,000 9,384,000 1,249,000 154,000 244,000 352,000 6,026,000 8,025,000 1,359,000 39.79 II Increase (Decrease) (202,000) 508,436 134,489 139,550 520,475 15,000 122,000 10,000 ( 58,300) 369' 548 45 8 ,248 62,227 ./ D£SCRIPTION CARRY -O VER FR OM PR EVIOUS F ISC AL YE ARS REVENUE Assessme nt at $39.79/parce l Oth e r Revenue Fede r al & State Participation Sale of Cap acity Right s Fe es Hi sc:e I I aneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EX ::.ENDITUR ES Di s tr ic t Cons truction Sha r e of Joint Wo r ks Const r uc tion Refunds of Cap i ta l Cost Recovery to ~ede r al Tr easury Share of Joi nt Op erating Distr ict Ope rating & Othe r Exp en diture s TOTAL EXPEND IT URES Carry -Ove r Ba l ance to Fo ll ow ing riscal Yea r Funds Necessa r y to Mee t Cor:i.~itments Prior to Rece ipt of Tax Arportio nme nts Fund Ba l ance or (Defici t) COU NTY SANITATIO N DISTRICT NO. 1 PRELIMI NARY ST ATEME NT OF PROJECTED CASH OPE RAT ING & CAP!TAL otlLY (EXCLUS IVE OF DEBT SER VI CE) FIS CA L YEARS 78 -79 TP.P.OUGH 82 -83 78 -79 79 -80 $ 6 ,02 6 ,000 $5,599 ,000 1,359,000 1 ,35 9 ,00 0 1 ,249,000 l '704 ,000 15 4,000 7,000 244,000 260,000 352 .00 0 323 ,000 $ 9,384,000 $ 9 ,252 ,000 $ 75 ,000 $ 75,000 2,694,ooo 2,767,000 -0-9,000 924,000 1 ,2 09,000 92 ,000 106,000 $ 3,785,000 $ 4' 166 ,000 $ 5 ,599 ,000 $ 5 ,086 ,000 2,083,000 2,828 ,000 $ 3 ,5 16 ,000 s 2,258,000 6/22ne FLOW 80 -81 81-82 82 -83 $5,086 ,000 $4,150,000 $2' 168 ,000 I ,359,000 l ,359 ,coo 1 ,359,000 2 ,780 ,000 3,278,000 2,687,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 279,000 302,000 302 ,000 295,000 239,000 127,000 $9 .806 ,000 $9.335,000 $6 ,650,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 3,9 13,000 4,601,000 3,4 74 ,000 9 ,000 9,000 30 ,000 1 ,5 12,000 2,317,000 2,959 ,000 122 ,000 140 ,000 16 1,000 $ 5 ,656 ,0 00 s1 ,161,ooo $6 ,724 ,000 $ 4' 150 ,000 $2 , 168 ,000 $ (74,000) 3,584,000 3,362,000 3 ,362 ,000 $ 566 ,000 ($1 ,194,000) ($3,436 ,oooj DISTRICT NO. 2 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSf!ErJT FOR SEWI:R SERVI CE & If-iMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense District Operating & Other Expenditures & Reserves ~istribut e Upper Basin Joint Works Equity to other CSD 1 s TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants Sale of Cap ac ity Right s Connection Fees & Industrial User Charges Interest & Misc. Income Carry-over TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be raised by Assessment r ~imated Number of Parce ls in the 'strict Estimated Annual Fl at Rate Special As sessment for Sewer Service & imm e diate availability ?13,610 77-78 78-79 I n-;;r :!.J::e (Decrea se ) 10,710,993 5,799,000 (4,911,993) 22,474,534 28,005,000 5,530,466 2, 123,0 89 2,625,000 501,911 1 , 781 , ooo 2, 261 , ooo I! 480, ooo 1 , 141 '000 1, 141 , 000 37,089,616 39,831,000 2,741,384 4,356,ooo 4,114,ooo ( 242,000) 455,000 22,000 ( 433,000) 1,580,000 1,530,000 50,000) 1,024,000 1,089,000 65,000 24,425,236 28,588,000 4,162,764 31,840,236 35,343,000 3,502,764 5,249,380 4~488,ooo ( 761 ,380) 39 ,50 .j DESCRIPTION CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS REVENUE Assessment at $39.50/parcel Othe r Revenue Fede ral & State Participation Sale of Capacity Rights Fees Miscellaneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EX PEND I TU RES District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction ~efunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Trea sury Share of Joint Operating Di str ic t Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ca rry-Ove r Balance to Following Fiscal Year Funds Necessary to Meet Co~~itments Prior to Receipt of Tax Ap portionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 2 PRELIMIN ARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH OPERATING & CAPITAL OllLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERV ICE) FISC AL YEARS 78-79 THROUGH 82-83 78-79 79 -80 $ 28 '5&8 '000 $24,751,000 11,488,ooo 4 ,488,000 4' 114 ,000 5 ,591 ,000 22,000 22 ,000 1,530,000 1 ,400,000 1 ,089,000 936,000 $39 ,831 ,000 $37. 188 ,000 $ 2' 108 ,000 $ 100,000 8,838,000 9,075,000 1, 141 ,000 30,000 2,625,000 3,435,000 368,000 423,000 $ 1 5 • 080, 000 $13,063,000 $24,751,000 $24,125,000 6,532,000 9,074,000 $ 18 • 2 1 9 , 000 $15,051,000 6/22/78 FLOW 80-81 81-82 82-83 $24' 125 ,000 $21 ,820,000 $16, 144,000 4,488,000 4,488,ooo 4,488,000 9, 120,000 10,754,000 8,816,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 1 ,300,000 1 ,200,000 1,000,000 914,000 827,000 609,000 $39 '969. 000 $39,111,000 $3 1 ,079,000 $ 500,000 $ 700,000 $ 200,000 12,837,000 15,094,000 11,395,000 30,000 30,000 100,000 4,296,000 6,584,000 8,410,000 486,000 55 9 ,000 643,000 $18, 149,000 $22,967,000 s20,748,ooo $21 ,820,000 $ 16, 144, 000 $1 0 , 3 3 1 , 000 11 ,484,000 10,374 ,000 10,374,000 $10,336,000 $ 5 '770,000 ($ 43 ,000) DISTRICT NO. 3 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESS~lErn FOR SE~ER SERVI CE & If·irlED I ATE AVAI LAB I LI TY 1978-79 Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (C o llection System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense District Op e rating & Oth e r Expe nditures & Reserves TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extended Revenue Federal-State Grants Sale of Capa c ity Rights Connection Fe es & Indu s tria l User Interest & Mi SC. Income .Carry-ove r TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be rai sed by Assessment F ~imated Numb e r of Parce l s in the .s trict Es ti mated Annual Flat Rate Special Assessment for Sewer Service & immed iate avai l ab ility Charges 156,555 77 -78 78-79 Increase (Decrease) 15,720,559 9,389,400 (6,331, 159) 14,935,524 25,939,000 11,003,476 2,192,631 2,587,000 394,369 2,077,600 2,483,600 406,000 34,926,314 40,399,000 5,472 ,686 I 4,775,000 4,546,000 ( 229,000) 75,000 561 ,000 486,000 1,243,000 1,370,000 127,000 1, 119,225 1,076,000 43,225) 20,422, 189 26,127,000 5,704,811 27,634,414 33,680,000 6,045,586 7,291,900 6,719,000 ( 572,900) 42.92 - . I 6/22/78 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 PRELI MINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERA TING & CAPI TAL Otl LY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISC AL YEARS 78 -79 THROUGH 82 -83 DESCRIPT ION 78 -79 79 -80 80 -81 81 -82 82-83 CAR RY -OVER FROM PREVIOUS FIS CAL YEARS $26 ,127 ,000 $2 1 ,24 7 ,000 $2 0 ,460,000 $18,382,000 $12,81 6,000 RE VENUE Assessmen t a t $ 42 . 92 /pa r ce 1 6,7 19,000 6,719 ,000 6,7 19,000 6 ,719,000 6,719,000 Other Revenue Fede ra l & State Pa rti c i pation 4,546,000 6,20 1,000 10,11 4,000 11 ,927 ,000 9,777 ,000 Sa l e of Capacity Rights 561 ,000 24,000 24,000 24 ,000 24 ,000 Fees 1,370,000 1,200,000 l '100,000 1,000,000 900 ,000 Mi see 11 aneous I ,076 ,000 871 ,000 839 ,0CO 753 ,000 527,000 TOTA L FUNDS AVA IL AB LE $ 40, 399 '000 $36 ,262,000 $39,256,000 $38,805,000 $30, 763, 000 EX?END I TURES Dis trict Con st r uction $ 6,258,000 $ l, 740,000 $ 1, 703 ,000 $ 1,960 ,000 $ 100,000 Shar~ of Joint Works Const r uction 9,802,000 10 ,06 4,000 14,236,000 16,74 0 ,000 12,637,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Fed eral Treas u ry -0 -33,000 33,000 33,000 11 1,000 Share of Joint Opera ti ng 2,587,000 3,384,000 4,234,000 6,488,000 8,287 ,000 Dist r i ct Operating & Othe r Expenditures 505,000 58 1,000 668,000 768,000 883,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1 9 , I 52 , 000 $ 15, 802 '000 $20,874,000 $25 ,989 ,000 $22,018,000 Carry -Over Ba lance to Fol lowing Fiscal Yea r $ 2 1 ,247 ,000 $ 20 ,460 ' 000 $18,382,000 s 12,8 16,ooo $ 8 ,745 ,000 Funds Neces sa r y to Meet Corrm i t me nts Prior to Rece ipt of Ta x Appo r t ionment s 7 ,901 ,000 1 O,l137 ,000 12,995 ,0 00 11 ,009,000 11 ,009 ,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ l~.~46 ,000 $ 10 ,02~ ,ooo $ 5 ,387,000 $ 1 ,807,000 ($ 2 ,264 ,000 ) DISTRICT NO. 5 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESS~1Ern FOR SE',~ER SERVI CE & If-iMEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Estimated Operating & Capital Requirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Tr ea tment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase & Reserves Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expen se District Operating ·& Oth er Expenditures & Reserves TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extend e d Revenue Federal-State Grants Sal~ of Capacity Rights Conn ec tion Fees & Indu s trial Use r Charges Interes t & Misc. Incom e Loan in aid of Con s truction Carry-over TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be rais e d by Assess me nt r imated Numb e r of Parcels in the 1strict Es tima t e d Annu a l Fl a t Ra t e Sp ec i a l As se ssment for Sewer Se rvice & imm e diat e a va il ab ility 19,365 77-78 78-79 3,605,945 2,170,000 4,732,950 6,560,000 396J801 462 J 000 719,000 828,000 9,454,696 10,020,000 914,000 24,ooo 142,000 233,000 1 J 150 J 000 5,520,764 7,983,764 1 ,470,932 940,000 116 J 000 50,000 237,000 1 J 150 J 000 6 J 371J000 s,n64,ooo 1J156 ,000 59.70 Increase (Decrease) (1,435,945) 1 ,827 ,050 65, 199 109,000 565,304 26,000 92,000 92,000) 4,000 850,236 880,236 314,932) . . , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 5 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUSI VE OF DEBT SERVICE) DESCR IPTION CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS REVENUE Assessme nt at $59.70/parcel Other Revenue Fe de ral & State Partic ipa tion Loans In Aid of Construction Sa l e of Ca pa city Rights Fees Mi see 11 aneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EXPE ND ITU RES District Co ns truction Share of Joint Works Construction & Equity Repay Loa n I n Aid of Construction Refunds of Capital Cost Recove ry to Fe de ral Treas ury Share of Joint Ope rating Di s trict Operating & Oth e r Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES C a rr y-Ov~r Balance to Following Fiscal Year Fund s Necessary to Meet Comm itments Pr io r to Receipt of Tax Apportionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) FIS CAL YEARS 78-79 TH ROUGH 82 -8 3 78 -79 $ 6,371,000 1, 156 ,000 940,000 l , 150,000 116 ,000 50,000 23 7 ,000 $10,020,000 $ 450,000 2,027,000 200,000 462,000 319,000 $"'3,458,000 $ 6,562,000 2,068,000 $ 4,494,000 79-80 $6 ,562,000 1, 15 6 ,000 l ,282 ,000 5,000 50,000 241,000 $9,296,000 $ 875,000 2,082 ,000 200,000 7,000 605,000 367 000 $4,136,000 $5 ' 160 ,000 2 ,4 28,000 $2,732,000 80-81 $5,160,000 1, 156,000 2,092,000 5 ,000 50 ,000 190,000 $8,653,000 $ 525,000 2,945,000 200,000 7,000 757 ,000 422,000 $4,856,000 $3,797,000 2 ,844,000 $ 953,000 81-82 $3,797,000 1'J56 ,000 2,467,000 5,000 140,000 140,000 $7,b05,000 $ 375,000 3,462,000 200,000 7,000 1, 159 ,000 485 000 $5,688 ,oo o $I, 9 17 ,000 2,475,000 ($ 558,000) 6/22/78 82-83 $1 ,917 ,00- 1'156,000 2,022,000 5,000 40,000 71 000 $5,211 ,000 $ 75,00 0 2,6 14,000 200,000 23,000 1 ,481,000 557.000 $4 ,950 ,00 0 s 261,000 2,475,000 ($2 ,21 4 ,00 0) DISTRICT NO. ~ PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESS~1Ern FOR SDffR SERVI CE & If·i~1ED IATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Estimated Oeeratin9 & Caeital Reguirements District (Collection System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Tr eatment Plant) Con st ru ct ion and Equity P~rchase & Rese r ves Joint Op e rating (Treatmen t Plant) Expense District Op erating & Other Ex pendi t ur es & Reserv es .......,.,, TOTAL REQUIREMENT S Extend e d Revenue Fed e ral-State Grants Sale of Cap a city Rights Conn e ct i o n Fee s & Indu st ri a l User Charges Inter es t & Misc. Incom e Carry-over TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be rai sed by Ass essme nt imated Nu mbe r of Parce l s in the 1>is trict Estimated Annu a l Fl at Rate Special Assessment for Sewe r Serv ic e & immediate ava il ab ility 21, 795 77-78 967,000 3, 168, 114 419,300 394,800 4,949,214 792,000 20,000 35,000 147,700 3, 106,445 4,101,145 848,069 78-79 305,000 4, 111, 000 492,000 477,000 5,385,000 802,000 99,000 40 ,000 150,000 3,424,000 4,515,000 870,000 39.92 Increa se (Decrease) ( 662, 001.'.) 942,886 72, 700 82,200 435,786 10,000 79,000 5,000 2,300 317,555 413,855 21, 931 ./ DESCRIPTION CARRY -O VER FROM PREVIOUS FI SCAL YEARS REVENUE Assessment at $39 .92/parcel Other Revenue Federal & State Pa rticipa t ion Sale of Capacity Rights Fees Hiscel laneous TOTA L FUNDS AVA ILABLE EX PEND ITURES District Construction Sha r e of Joint Wo r ks Construction Refunds of Capital Cost Recove r y to Federal Tre asu r y Share of Joint Operating Dist rict Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Carry-Over Ba l ance to Following Fi sca l Year Funds Necessary to Mee t Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Appo rtionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) COU NTY SANITATION DI STRICT NO . 6 PRELIMI NARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH OPERATING & CAPITAL ONLY (EXCLUS IVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78 -79 THROUGH 82 -83 78 -79 79-80 $3 ,424,000 $3,012,000 870 ,000 870,000 802,000 1,095,000 99,000 4,000 40,000 40,000 15 0,000 131 ,000 $5,385,000 $5 ,152,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 I, 731 ,000 1,777,000 6,000 491 ,000 643,000 76,000 87,000 $2,373,000 $2,538,000 $3,0 12,000 $2,614,000 1 ,269 ,QQQ 2 ,225 ,0QQ $1,74 31000 $ ~89 ,000 6/22/78 FLOW 80 -81 81-82 82-83 $2,614 ,ooo $1 ,979,000 ($ 2 1 ,000) 870,000 870,000 ·870 ,000 1. 786 ,000 2 , I 06 ,000 l, 726 ,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 40,000 40 ,00 0 40,000 114 000 85 000 -0 - $5,428,ooo $5,084,000 $2,619,000 $ 25,000 $ 795 ,000 $ 525,000 2 ,514,000 2,956 ,000 2,231,000 6,000 6,000 20 ,000 804,000 1,233,000 1 ,57 5,000 100,000 115 ,000 132 000 $3,449,000 $5 .1 05,000 $4,483,000 $1 ,979,000 ($ 21,000) ( $1 ,864 ,000) 2 553,QQO 21242!000 2 ,242 ,QQQ ($ 5Z4 QQQ) ( $2 1263 I 000) ( $4, 106,000) DISTRICT NO. 7 PRELIMINARY ESTI MAT E OF ANNUAL FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSES S~lEr n FOR SEWER SERVI CE & Hu'1ED I ATE AVA I LAB I LI TY 1978-79 Estimqt ed Ope rating & Capital Requi r eme nt s Distric t (Coll ect i on System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equi ty Purchase & Reserves Joint Op erat ing (Treatment Plant) Expen s e District Op e rating & Oth e r Expe nditures & Res e rv es TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extended Revenue Fe de r a l -State Grants Sa l e of Capa ci ty Rights Conn e cti on Fees & In dus tri a l User Charges Int e rest & Mi s c. Income Due from Citi es Carry-ov er TOTAL OTHER REVENUE Amount to be raised by Assessme nt F · i mated Numb e r of Parcels in the .:>t r i ct Es timated Annu a l Fl at Rate Special Assessme nt for Sew e r Se rvice & i mm e diat e availab ili ty 27,07 5 77-78 4,492,327 5,9 37,058 444,526 78-79 3 , 170,300 8,022,000 526,000 806,050 985,200 11 '6 79 '961 12 ' 704 '000 1 '147' 000 1 '161 '000 30,000 144,000 384,ooo 40 5 ,000 312,612 332,000 1,853,000 350,000 6,345,668 9,280,000 10 ,,072,28 0 11'672' 000 1'607 '681 1,03 2,000 38 . 12 Increase (D e crease ) (l ,321,527) 2,08 4 ,9 42 81 '474 179, 150 1,024,039 14,000 114 ' 000 21 ,000 19,388 (1,503 ,000) 2,934,332 1'599' 720 ( 575,681) . I DESCRIPTION CAR RY -OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS RE VEN UE Assessment at $38 . 12/parcel Other Revenu·e Fede ral & State Participation Sale of Capacity Rights Fees Misce llaneou s TOT AL FUNDS AVAILABLE EX ?END IT URES District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Fede ral Treasury Share of Joint Operating District Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPEND ITURES Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 PRELIMIN ARY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH OPERATING & CAPITAL DULY (EXCLUS IVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78 -79 THROUGH 82 -8 3 78 -79 79 -80 $9,280,000 $8,777,000 1 ,032 ,000 l ,032 ,000 1'161,000 1 ,584,000 144 ,000 6 ,000 405,000 350,000 682,000 312,COO $12,704,000 $12,061 ,000 $ 496,000 $ 490,000 2,505,0 CO 2 ,572 ,000 8,000 525,000 688,000 401 ,000 461 ,000 $3,927,000 $4,219,000 $8,777,000 $7,84 2 ,000 2,110,000 2,831 ,O OQ $616671000 s2,011 ,ooo 6/22/78 FLOW 80-81 81-82 82-83 $7,842,000 $6,406 ,000 $4,596 ,000 1,032,000 1 ,032 ,0 00 1 ,032,000 2,58 4,000 3,047 ,000 2 ,498 ,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 325,000 300,000 275,000 278,000 229,000 162,000 $12 ,067,000 $11 ,020 ,000 $8 ,569,000 $ 625,000 $ 210,000 $ 185 ,000 3,637,000 4,277,000 3,229,000 8,000 8,000 28,000 861 ,000 1,319,000 1,685 ,000 53 0,000 610,000 70 2,000 $5,661,000 $6,424,000 $5,829,000 $6,406,000 $4,596,000 $2,740 ,000 3,212 QQQ 2 915,QQQ 2,915,QQQ S3, 194 ,000 s 1 ,681 ,ooo (S lZ S .QQQ) -DiSTRICT NO. 11 PRELIMIN/\RY ESTIMATE OF ANNU/\L FLAT R/\TE SPECIAL ASSESSrlErlT FOR SE~ER SERVI CE & IM MEDIATE AVAILABILITY 1978-79 Estimated Operating & Capital Requir eme nts District (C ol l ection System) Construction & Reserves Joint Works (Treatment Plant) Construction and Equity Purchase&. Reserves Joint Operating (Treatment Plant) Expense District Operating & Other Expend itures & Res erves TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Extended Revenue Fe deral-State Grants Sale of Capacity Rights Conn ect ion Fees & In dustr ial User Charges Interest & Misc. Income Carry-Over TOTAL OTHER REVEN UE . Amount to be raised by Assessment *Includes 1977-7 8 f ees not r em i tted by City **Includes ~14 1 M Equ i ty Sa l e in 77-78; -0-in 78-79 ~tt ma t ed Number of Parcels in the District Estim.:it e d Annuu1 Flat Rate Specia l Asses sme nt for Sewer Service & invn c .:liutc avni l .:ib i 1 i ty • ·28,0 05 77-78 78 -79 5,266,000 4,461,000 3,243,256 5,363,000 452,026 537,000 623,800 767,000 9,585,082 11,1 28,ooo 934,ooo 947,000 24,ooo 117, 000 240,000 597,000 382,800)°;)'; 281,000 6,359,5 64 7,645,000 7 ,9110, 364 9,587,000 1,,644, 718 l , 5111 , 000 55.03 I ' l Increa se (Decrease) ( 805,00 0) 2,119,7l14 84,974 143,200 1,51~2,918 13,000 93,000 357' 000'~ ( 10 l , 800) 1,285,lt36 1,646,636 ( 103,718) .} 6/22/78 COUNT Y SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 11 PRELIMI NARY ST AT EMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW OPERA TI NG & CAP IT AL ONLY (EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT SERVICE) FISCAL YEARS 78 -79 THROUGH 82-83 DESCRIPTION 78-79 79-80 80-81 81-82 82-83 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS Fl SCAL YEARS $7,645,000 $6,882,000 $4,990 ,000 $4,435,000 $ 1. 715 ,000 REVENUE Assessme nt at $55.03/parcel 1 ,54 1 ,000 1,541,000 l ,54 l ,000 1 ,54 l ,000 1'54 l ,000 Other Revenue Fede ral & State Participation 947 ,000 1 ,292,000 2' 107 ,000 2,484,000 2,037,000 Sal e o f Capacity Rights l 17 ,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fees 597,000 397,000 397,000 350,000 300,000 Mis cel l aneous 28 l ,000 252,000 168 ,000 162,000 61 ,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $11, 128,000 $10,369,000 $9,208,000 $8 ,977 ,000 $ 5,659,000 EXPEND IT URES Di strict Co nstruction $1,406,000 $2,272,000 $ 576,000 $2 ,023 ,000 $ l ,814 ,000 Sha r e of J oint Works Con s truction 2,042,000 2,097,000 2,966,000 3,488,ooo 2,633,000 Ref unds of Cap ita l Cost Recovery to Federa l Treasury 7,000 7,000 7 ,000 23,000 Sha r e of J o int Operating 537,000 703,000 879,000 . 1,348,000 1, 721 ,000 Di st ri ct Ope r at i ng & Other Expenditures 26 1 ,000 300,000 345,000 396,000 455,000 TOTAL EXPEND ITURES $4,246,ooo $5,379,000 $4 ,773 ,000 $7,262,000 $ 6,646,ooo Ca rry-Ove r Ba lan ce to Fol lowing Fi sca l Yea r $ 6 ,882 ,000 $ 4 '990 ,000 $4 ,435 ,000 $1'715 ,000 ( $ 987,000) Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Pri or to Receipt o f Tax Appo rti onme n ts 2,690,000 2,387,000 3,631 ,000 3,323,000 3 ,323,000 Fund Bal a nce or (Deficit) $ 41 1921000 $21603100 0 $ 8041000 ($116081000) ($ 4,310 ,000 ) ) (I) (2) 1977-78 TAX FUNDING LEVEL ESTIMATED NUMBER TOTAL TAX DISTRICT OF PARCELS LEVY DEBT SERVICE $1.382,548 $ 85,775 2 5.129.i.96 lt80, 116 3 7.970,515 678,615 5 l,497.lt64 26,532 6 879,992 31.923 7 2,238,815 631,134 11 1,729,839 85 •. 121 TOTAL $21,428.669 $2,019.216 34,155 z 113,610 3 156,555 5 19.365 ' 21, 795 7 27,075 11 28,005 AVERAGE 4oo.s6o ) ESTIHATED OPERATING/CAPITAL USER CHARGE TO PROVIDE 1978-79 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (3) (4) (S) (6) 1978·79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE FINANCING BASED ON 1977-78 FUNDING LEVEL IF DISTS DO RECEIVE PRO-RATA SHARE OF HAXIHUH OPER/ TAXES UNDER JARVIS CAPITAL USER CHARGE IF DISTS l ,,) AHOUHT TO BE RECEIVE NO PRO-I ' RAISED BY RATA SHARE OF OPER/CAPITAL OPER/CAPITAL TAXES UNDER JARVIS HAXIHUH OPER/ USER CHARGE (1) -(2) (I) -(2) CAPITAL TAX LEVY (Ii) -(5) $ 1.296, 773 $ 1,296,773 $ sos ,781 $ 790,992 5,249.380 5,2'i9.380 1,907,846 3,341,53lt 7,291.900 7,291,900 2,524,808 4,767,092 1,i.70,932 1,470,932 579,860 891,072 848,069 81t8.069 330,32lt 517,745 1.607.681 1,607.681 654,780 952,901 1,644,718 1,644,718 510,039 1,134,679 $19,409,lt53 $19,409,J153 $7,013,'438 s12,396.01s ) June 14, 1978 (7) (8) (9) 1978-79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE FINAHCltlG BASED ON RECOMMENDED JOINT VORKS REDUCTION IN CHARGE TO P~OPERTY C~~ER l.HOUNT TO BE HAXIHUH OPER/ RAISED BY OPER/ CAPITAL USER CAi>ITl.L USER CHARGE IF DISTS Cri:.l\GE IF CISTS RECOHHENDED RECEIVED NO PRO• RECEIVE r?.~-P.:.T~ JOINT \./ORKS RATA SHARE OF SHt.PE CF r:..1ES TAX LEVY• "TAXES UNDER JARVIS t.IHiER J;..D•: IS REDUCTION (3) -(7) (3) -t5) -(7) $ )!12 .437 $ 1. \54,336 $ 6z.a.sss 388.1to7 lt.860.973 2,S53.127 572,085 6,719,815 li,195.CJ7 106,664 1,364,268 7S!t.t.oS 103.377 7ltlt·.692 ltlle.368 156,938 1,ltS0,743 795.S63 103,i.07 1,541,311 I ,031.272 . $1,573.315 $17 ,836.138 $10.822,700 OPERATING CAPITAL USER CHARGE PER PARCEL ~ $ 37.97 $ 23.16 $ 33.80 $ 18.99 46.21 29.ltl 42.79 25-99 lt6.58 30.45 42.92 26.80 75.96 lt6.01 70.ltS '40.5 38.91 23.76 3lt.17 19.01 59.38 35.19 53.58 29.i.o 58.73 40.52 55.04 36.82 $ lt8.46 $ 30,95 $ ltlt.53 $ 27.02 "FOR-.i~~nr~10NAL INFORMATION CALL FRED H.AR~R OR WAYNE SYLVESTER TELEPHONi S40-2910 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.OBOX8t27 ~' July 6, 1978 10:00 a.m. PRESS RELEASE 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962·2411 PUBLiC HEARING JULY 19, 1978 -6:00 P.M. RE PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH AND COLLECT FLAT RATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SEWER SERVICE AND IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY ON TAX ROLL In the past, the Sanitation Districts have received the bulk of their revenues from a special assessment for sewer service against all real property and improvements in the Districts based on the ad valorem property rolls of the County. The cost to the average homeowner, depending on the District, for sewer service exclusive of maintenance of local sewers has been $3 to $5 per month and has been collected via the County tax bill. With the passage of the Jarvis/Gann Initiative (Proposition 13), the ~ question arises: Does this provision prohibit the Districts from levying the charges that have been levied in all prior years? While the Dis- tricts' General Counsel has submitted the ~ttached legal opinion advising that the Districts are not barred from levying a charge for services based on the ad valorem assessment roll of the County, no clear-cut decision has been received from the State or County. Because of this uncertainty, the Boards of Directors of the Sanitation Districts are considering a flat rate special assessment on each parcel this year to insure that adequate funds are available to continue the construction ~ and operation of the Districts' facilities. It is proposed that the flat rate special assessments will be col- lected on the County tax roll, rather than by direct billing pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 5473.1. The sewer .service costs to the average homeowner utilizing the flat rate special .. ------~ . ~-assessment are essentially the same as those previously based on the ad valorem assessment roll. However, owners of properties with low assessed valuations will find the proposed flat rate assessments slightly higher than the charges paid this past year, while the owners of property with high assessed valuations will experience a reduction in their costs for sewer service. 78/79 User Charf e Financing Based on Recommended 2.2 Million Reduction in Charges to Pro2ertI Owners Less Possible Pro Rata Share of Allowable Tax Pro2osed User Charge Collections Dist. 11 39. 79 .. 14.81_ 24.98 Dist. 12 39.50 16.80 22.70 I Dist. fJ3 42.92 16.13 26.79 Dist~ 15 59.70 29.95 29.75 Dist. #6 39.92 15.15 24.77 Dist. 17 38.12 24.19 13.93 Dist.#11 55.03 18.21 36.82 If the Sanitation Districts receive their proportionate share of the allowable tax collections, the proposed flat rate special assess- ments for each property will be reduced as much as 40%. The Boards of Directors have always been mindful of costs and the distribution of same. The Districts' long-range planning and -'~ budgeting program has paid off for the property owner. In spite of -2- i.1 Ito 39 . 38 en 37 ... z 36 w u 35 3~ 33 32 31 73 7Ii 7'• 75 76 77 -~ -~ 75F I S tD A L 7Y E A 7R increased demands for sewer service and additional facilities required by higher State and Federal environmental standards, the combined average annual variable ad valorem special assess- ment rate has steadily declined from 42¢/$100 assessed valuation in 72/73 to 31¢/$100 assessed valuation in 77/78. The Dis- tricts' Boards of Directors have VARIABLE RATE AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASS~SSMENT reduced the budget requirements to lighten the property owners' ~burden by· $2.2 million for this fiscal year, 78/79. The Directors are on record as favoring continuing the variable ~ate ·ad valorem special assessment rather ~ban the proposed flat rate assessment because it is more equitable and less expensive to administer. . . However; if the necessary legal decisions to permit the continued use of the variable assessment charge ~re not forthcoming by August 10th, the final date for submission of the flat rate assessment charges to the County A~ditor, it appears the Directors will proceed with the flat rate assessment to insure that adequate funds are available. Tqe Districts'.proposed flat rate ·charges are considerably less than those for· most other locales. In many cases throughout the country, sewer use charges range from 1/2 to more than double the monthly water /~ bill. -3- • ----,/II The indebtedness is about 3% of the Districts' expenditures. ~ If the proposed flat rate special assessment goes into effect, funds for bond debt will be collected separately on the tax bill based on the Assessor's valuations for.land and improvements only. If the flat rate special assessment procedure becomes a fact and is continued in subsequent years, the Districts will proceed with a planned sewer use revenue program to become effective July 1, 1979, which will take into account the actual use of the Districts' sewerage facilities. In all probability, the individual homeowners' 79/80 flat rate assessment in that case will be less than this year's charge. The Sanitation Districts operate the third largest wastewater (sewage) treatment system on the West Coast. The capital costs of present day facilities are $229 million; additional construction required during the next 8 years will double this figure. The. Districts collect, treat, and dispose of wastewater from 408,000 residential, connnercial and industrial connections serving 1.5 million citizens in the 23 cities in the Orange County metropolitan area. Annual revenues come from variable rate ad valorem special assessments, connection fees, industrial use. fees, annexation charges and State and Federal construction grants. The annual expenditures break down approximately 10% for operations and maintenance, 87% for current and planned treatment plant and trunk sewer construction, 3% for bonded debt retirement. -4- ?,.--.. ........ .- The Boards of Directors of the seven Sanitation Districts will hold a public hearing July 19th, 6:00 p.m., at the Districts' office, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 on a proposed ·flat-rat~ special assessment for sewer service and immediate availability to be collected by the County Tax Collector on this year's tax bill for each property parcel in lieu of the variable rate ad valorem special assessment. Notices have been mailed to all property owners of record on the 77/78 assessment rolls. The Sanitation Districts' staff is standing by to answer property owner questions as to the proposed flat rate special assessments, telephone 540-2910, Extension 5, Mondays through Fridays -7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. CfHNfa) \ . ·. c4l :. < .• UGISDR I · .• -:~ • .": Mon., June 26,.1978 .... ~. ·. ·_,:· ;i1: ·-:-bt~'l\ttitf ~t . , . ----, ___ -----· .... . ·I • ;.. ·- ---.. (-A<-. P~-P(_D... .1 EPA About Face • ·~ ·. ~ __ .-J ... ..!. The' National Environmental J>ro. mental agency backE!d down and ' lectibn ·Agency <EPA> and environ-. ~crapped its plan.· . men'tal activis~ who spur' it on. are ,c\t present the EPA is trying to· finding some of their tactics can : be force Los Angeles to stop· pumping ~ against them. 'This agency. ana· . sewage . sludge five miles off. shore its .fanatical fans have had about,ev-· into a submarine canyon. The agency erythingtheirownwayfor.quite·some "wants the .. city to build treatment time.· · plants and . put the sludge in landfills · ~: U they coul.d not stop a needed ener-· at a cost over $250 million. The foun-, gy,industry by forthright means. they · dation is fighting this one and says the often successfully tied the project up EPA .deinand will cause. geological .in court until it became too expensive ·damage. add heavy traffic and in· to pursue. And. this tactic has now crease air pollution. · ~n turned against them in enough The law firm cites EPA 's own study .areas to give them pause to reflect. which has shown that ocean. use has ·.A business-backed law firm. Pacific had little adverse effect ·on marine Legaj Foundation in Sacramento. won. ecology. Demanding an impact state· a suit in 1973 against EPA by charging ment. the foundation is putting the it had violated environmental ilaws agency· on the ·ropes. by the same when. it refused to permit the use of tactics often employed· by EPA and DDT against the tussock moth. The environmentalists. risks involved in using the insecticide. If the environmentalists Jose this the foundation said. were negligible one it would surely have ·an adverse compared to the'envir:onmental dam-effect on the EPA's drive to force age done by the moth larvae. It was · secondary treatment throughout the shoWll that 700. mil1ion board feet of nation. timber had .been lost. We._are pleased to see the idea sur- ~·The agency granted a DDT permit ·face that peop~e are also part of the . in 1974. · environment. Air. water .. plant and .; 'fransportation· planners .in Lds Aogeles tried to ·force dri.vers to pool and ride buses by setting aside one lane on a busy freeway for the exclu- sive ·use of car-pools and buses. This angered drivers and caused accidents an~congestion. - .:r-he ·foundation· .filed suit claiming •that the congestion increased air pol- ~lution and damaged the human ·envi- ronment by the increased tiazards. An impact statem~nt was demanded and a federal judge agreed. The environ- wildlife need consideration. but peo- ple were also placed on this planet and have prjmary needs. However. it should not be necessary to continue. to turn the tactics back upon over-ze~lous agencies. This in itself can add injury to the economic environment for people. Although these inctdents may t~nd to show inconsistencies of govern- ment regulators and help 1 to keep them in check. the onlv real cure is to get government and iis bureaucracy out of autocratic control. . -·. ,,-,, -----------------, ---------------• ·--\'+4.JJ J'f..J-"O.,IJ-;J APPEAL 1'11CM PEr.M [T DECISION OF REGIQt\JAL r.tMM.IS3ION 1. Name, address and telephone number of appellant: Ami1:os do llolon libi ca 170hl Courtney L@e Zip No. 2. Name, address and telephone number of appellant's representative, if any: Kenneth and Rhoda Martyn ___!7041 Courtney Lane Huntin.ton Beach Zip Section II. Decision of ReR].onal Commission Being A~oealed l. Name of Regional Commission: __ S~o_u_t_h...._.C~owa~s~t------------------------------- 2. Date of Regional Commission's decision:_J_un __ e __ 2_6_, __ 1~9~7_8 ________________ ~- 3. Regional Commission File Nurnber: _ _.P_-..... 7.-.8-_3.._l .. 8..;;;;14.._ ___________ _ 4. Brief description of development being appealed: Reach 1 and 2 of a sewer system; sewer pipe is 84-inches in diameter 7 to 5 vote to a rove construction of Reach 1 and 2 contr to Coastal starr reconunendation Section III. Identification and Notifiaation of Other Interested Parties 1. State the names and addresses of the following parties. Use additional paper if necessarJ: a. The name and address of the pennit applicant: County Sanitation District Ho. 11 of Oram:e County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley 9?708 b. The governing body of each county, city and ether local goverrunent agencies having jurisdiction of the project area: Huntinaton Beach City Council 3oard of 3upervj.sors of Oranae County c. Names and addresses of all persons who expressed support or opposition to the development and provided their names and addresses to the Regional Commission or are otherwise known by the appellant to have A;.p'=al He. an interest in the matter appealed: Dennis M. Reid, Senior Engineer, .Sanitation District Ho. 11 (address above) Edward Selich, Planning Director, City of Huntinirton Beach. P.O. B ox 190 Horbert Da11. 1107 9th Street, doom '119. Sacramento 95814 Date Filed: ----------------- .. -.· ! -2-... .. ., ........... __ ~-,/ Section IV. Statement of Facts to L'Amonstrate ~ubatantial I~sue ~ The appellant must demonstrate to the State CcnmiJsion that a substantial i~s~e is raised ty the appeal, an issue of such conc~rn that it warrants a new hearing of the appiica:tion blr the Coa:mission. 'rhe appellant• s !'ailure to set forth in sufficient detail the· facts 11pon which the ap9eal is based, and the reasons the appellant believes the decision of the Regional Commission to be inconsistent w:i"tr: the requirements of the Coastal Act, may result in rejection of the appeal on grounds that the presence of a substantial issue has not been demonstrated. Due to the short deadlines provided in the Coa3tal Act, review of.' your .1ppeal will not be possible unless a complete and fully-substantiated appeal is aubmitted at this time. Check applicable reason(s} why you believe the 3tate Conmi3sion should hear the appeal. (In general, the Commission has not foWld that an appeal present~ a substantial issue that warrants hearing unless one of the following factors io present.) x 1. The development present3 a statewide planning issue on which guidance of the State Commission is required and the matter ia of statewide significance. x 2. The decision of the Regional Conmdssion adversely affects coastal resources or the proper public use of resources, contrary to specific provisions of the Coastal Act of 1976. x 3. The decision of the Regional Coamission is inconsistent 1ri.th previous decisions of the State Commission or did not adequately address issues covered by the interpretive guidelines adopted by the State Commission. 4. The proceedings of the Regional Coi:mission wer9 materially affected ---- by inaccurate f~~tual information or procedural er~or ~ therefore resulted in a decision contrary to the policies of the Coastal Act of 1976. ----5. The decision of the Regional Con:mission should be changed because of ; new factual infonnation, relating to coastal issues,~ this information could not reasonably have been presented to the Regional Co'1D':lission. 6. Other (Specify in detail} ------------------------------------------------------- Attach a complete, concise statement of facts substantiating the alleged reasons ~. warranting hearing of the appeal by the State Commission and reversal or modifi- cation of the decision of the Regional Conmission• Section V. Certification I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of UiY knowledge and I underst_and that any misstatement or omission of the informatiori-reQ.\ies:ted may be groun~s for rejection of this appeal. DATED July 5, 1978 Revised 2/17/77 i l I t l I I I ~ I t l I \ ·--... ~ -. Appeal of P-78-3184 Amigos de Bolsa Chica The construction of this 84-inch sewer line is predicated on \. Signal Landmark's development plans for the northern Bolaa Chica bluffs, for their marina community ·in the Bolsa Chlca lowlands, and the Huntington Beach Company's development plans for the southeastern bluffs of Bolsa Chica. The future uses in the Bolsa Chica area have not been determined. In fact, the County of Orange and the City of Huntington B each are currently involved in the preparation of a Local Coastal Plan. Politi- cally, the citizens of Huntington Beach have indicated strongly that they do not want a marina connnunity in the lowlands of Bolsa Chica. . To construct such a large sewer pipe would invite intense develop- ment in Huntington Beach and the Bolsa Chica area. The Bolsa Chica area is an envirorunentally sensitive area and needs protection from urban development. Less than 10.% of California coastal. wetlands remain. At the South Coast Regional Connnission hearing on June 26, 1978 the District Engineer of County Sanitation District No. 11 said that 10% of the sewer trunk system is allocated for development in the Bolsa Chica. He further stated that if development did ~ take place in the Bolsa Chica, the size of the pipe could only be reduced from 84 inches to 81 or 82 inches. Could this statement be evaluated by a competent engineer to verify its technical accuracy? Reach 1 and 2 should not be approved until the local coastal programs ·. have determined the uses in the Bolsa Chica lowlands and both bluffs. It is highly likely that the size of the pipes for Reach l and 2 should be greatly reduced in size--say to a 4-f'oot pipe. The Planning Director of the City of Hwitington Beach said in his testimony to the South Coast • t. ,. -........ ~~· Page 2 Appeal of P-7U-Jl84 Amigos de Bolsa Chica negional Commission on June 26, 1978, 11'fhe property within the coastal area does not need this trunk sewer as there is sufticient capacity for future development." Based on all previous experience, approving the larger pipe will encourage development in the Bolsa Chica area • ..... ... oz: t d a t inr BL. • :~ /' 1' -~.: ·J·. 3 ~·~ ·-,_, \ - .• /~T5/391-b500 Section !. Ac~ell3r.~ ~. 1. · Nrime, a.cd!-eso and t~lcphonc number of appell~1t: • f71LeEJJ &eG6J ~/)lot ~&IJ s~ . ~-~ ___ g_(:--"';;._, __ ~, ------ ~I _,_.. ~/---J::J. . L , ,, I M . "11~~:CA4.~.. ~ I <zlti'') I z_,,p_./6 ~0-. /J Zip lA.rea7 Code H1c!ephone No. 2. Name, aKaress and telephone nur.ibcr of appellant's representative, if cµl~: ( ) Zip (Area Code)(Telephone No.) Section II. Decision of R~sri.on~l Cominission Eein~ A~n~aled l. Name of Re 6 .:.onal Comnis~ion:~~~.,Z-ti£.'i;~~ 2. Da:te of Regional Colll!lliSsion's decision:_(}..:~ ;h., /£72' · 3. Regional Ccilliiission .File !\'umber: Q ~ ZJ{-.3'/8'¥ . 4. Brief description of development being appealed: --~----~--~------------ •. ·~ · Section III. Ide~tification and Notific.ation of Other Interested Parties ·. ·1. State the namas and addresses of the fo~lcwing parties. Use additional. paper if' necessarJ: . . ...... . ;·. :·~' •• ~ •• )#J,.. . . :. ,. .. ~ .... . · ... --....... ~ ··-· ... .-:. : .. -:· ...... ; -.... a. The name and address o~ the p~nnit applicant: ·-(h,#~~·~s~~j ~~:;f-~· --· '• • • I ·· fd11· livt-1la;(/ fr~~j~/t, ~. 'l:<ZP~ b. The g~;~~n-~ b~dy .. of ~ach·~~uniY,-'-cit:Y a...:d ~er iC::-~a.i goven'un~~t agencies having jurisdict~?:C: ~~ the project area: . . ... . --; .. t .. •• /JJJ/ir~~·~:.rt~ . -s~~ .. ~~~ +4~ : ........ -. . ···~ ~ .. I .• -I I • I c. Names and addresses of all persons who expressed support or opposition tQ_ th.t? develcp!r.ent and provided th~ir names and address~::? ___ j;o .:t~e _. . .. ---·-~· .. "Regional Ccmmission or are otherwise lmo~m by the appellant to have ·.· an interest fn the matter appealed: · . · ---------------~--------~--~----·~~----·----------------------------------------- TO EE COMrLEr.ED BY CCNMISSIO!l: ...... -.... Appeal No. ~ . -· . .. : • .-•• & -.• I. Date Filed: 41> ,. .. : . -· . -···· ... . .. . . .... .. ~----~~--~----. i. ' •• i " t '4 . ... -,. • • I • • - .;. I. • ·' .. ·~ . . ,• . s~cti·:>n r1. ~-The appellant tn'~3t d~~cnstrate to the State Cc:rr.li~nicr. that a sub~t~~~ial i=s~e is raised by ~he appeal, ar. i~ouc of c~ch cor.cer:i that it warrants a new hearing or·t~c D.~?:ication by the Cc::!:l.iooion. The appell~t's fail'..lre to set forth in sufficient c!ct.1il "the fact:.l i.4pon which ~he appeal is b::i.sed, and the reason3 the appclla.'lt believes the d.cci:.;ion of the Regional Ccr:rr.ission to be incon!listent with the rcquir~cnts of ~he Co~stal Act, may result in rejection of th~ appeal on grounds th~t the presence of a substantial issue has not been demon3trat~d. Due to the short deadlines provided in the Coa3tal Act, review of your appeal will not be possible unless a complete and full~-substa.ntiated appeal is ~ubmitted at this time. Check applicable reason(s) why yc:iu beli~•e the 3tate Comrnis3ion should he~~ the appeal. (In general, the Cornrnission has r.ot founc that an appeal presents a substa.'ltial issue tha-: warrants heari~g \m.less one of -the following factors i~ present.) >< 1. The development pres~nts a ·statewid~ planning issue on:· which guidance of' the State Commission is required and the matter is or statewide signif'ica.nce. ~ 2. The decision of the Regional Col'!!mission adversely affects coastal .. resources or the proper public use of r~sources, contrary.to specific provisions ~ of the Coastal· Act. of 1976. . _________ 3. The decision of the Regier.al Cco::mission is inco?l.Sistent td.th previotis decisions of the State CO!mlissicn or did not adequately address issues covered by the interpretive guidelines adopted by the State Conmi.ssion." ... ____ 4 •.. The proceedings of the Regional:-CoII?!Ii..ssion' were materially a.ffectad by inaccurate factual inf'orma.tion or procedural er=or and.therefore resulted in -· a decision ~ontrazy to the policies ~f th:e Coa~tal A~t of 1976. ~·--~·--~ ···-:·--:·· ·· .... . . . ____ 5. The decision of the Regional Coll'l!li.ssion should be changed because of new factual infoni:aticn, relating to coastal i:5sues, and this infonna.tion could -~ .· .· .. .. . ··:·.: .•. _ ·:· .. not reasonably ~~ve been presented to the Regional Commission~ .· ... _..._ ___ 6.. Other (~pecify in ·detail) --------~----------~---------------------------- ' . ·. . ....... •"'". -·· : ..... ~-Attach a complete , concise statement of facts substantiating the alleged reason$ warranting hearing of the appeal.by the State Comnission and reversal er modifi- . cation of the decision of the Regional Comi'!lission• · ... ·· • ~.::. •• •• ••• # ................... _..._ .-...-.. ---· -...-... • .. ·- • • •• • ~· • •• ~'' .•• •o-• II' ' -: • , • Section V. · Certification and may I declare that the foregoing is true and correct t~ the best of JriY knowledge I understand that any misst.atemcnt· or omission pf the information--requested be grow1ds for rejection of this appeal: . · · . a~tP~~ . · DATFJJ~~. 'S )~7fl .· . l ' . - Sienature of appellant or representa~ive t' . ·-·· ·-· . ... ·-····-.. . .. .. . ........ _..;,. ...... -...... •· -................. -. •·• •.. .. . .•. . ... . . .. ~. ...• .... •. .. . ..................... _...,...... __ ......... -................ _._.. ....... ··---·..-·. "Revised 2/17/77 ·. ' ,. t . . ~ :... .. : . . . . ~ . ·. ! . ': . ·l .. . • , I i r ~~1 STATEMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL ISSUE APPEAL P-?8._3184 The attached publicity reveals information that this is the first time the South Coast Regional Com.~ission is making an·effort to law- fully fulfill its role as mandated under the Coastal Act or 1976 - Chap. I, Sec. 30006 and Chap. 4, Sec. 30339 (a). This "public right" to "!'ully participate" in coastal decisions with full "understanding" has been and still is being violated by this Commission in Orange County without any ef I'ort at this point and time being made to include "the widest opportunity" :for citizen input9 I am indeed that fact since I am widely known by the Commission to be the only public citizen at large showing publicly an intensive ~ interest in coastal plan..~ing, especially in Orange County, and yet I have never_ been granted such an opportunity by any or the Com.~issi±oners Thus this permit approval definitely precludes in every way planning options as set !'orth in SCRC staf~'s findings which must work with citizens' rights. , ~ . . A 10 _DA\L y PILOT . Thursday. June 29. 19?8 --·-·---. -. --· ,, . ~ .. -""*·-·-· CO~i Panel §el~--· ~Jo J . llfif A 9 i,'llgt1t 1~Jd..ee.tm_g§ ·south Coast Regional Commission members so"on wm begin meetings in the e\'enings to discuss· Local \\~ork Programs. required of e\'ery in-. corporated city or county 'within the region; · ... : These are "plans spelling out concepts and prioritie~do be set for dealing wjth future. com· m~nity development projects or preservation of n~.tura1 resources within a ~pecific area. · ·~ . :". CO;"\UtllSSJON MEMBERS MEETING in Huntinmoz:i ~each Monday voted 7 to 1 to initiate the evening meetings,-which will not -require _ quorum cif commissioners, since no ·action will be taken. · · · ·· · · . · · Commissioner Diane Keiser was the lone dissi- denL · • · Normally, these hearings have been held dur- ing the d~y and some criticism has been leveled at the lack of citizen participation except by special intere~t. groups . . . • "WE HA VE A PROBLEM with people who - work days," ·observed ·Commissioner Margot E. ;Feuer. · · · · · · · · · · ·. · · · · · · · · · ... · -· . · · The evening meetings are expected to be held in Torrance City Council chambers because most. work programs .Yet to be staged involve Los Angeles County communities. -· ; .. · Commissioners meet every other Monday in · Huntington Beach City Council chambers to Cli~cuss primarily Orange CoWlty issues, but must be .:out· by 5 .p.m., ·.when the City Council study session .starts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·, . . . . . . ' .·;. .: ·--········-····' .,..~ ).I . APPEAL Jt'ROM PF:HMIT DECISION OF HEGIONAL CC:t1!-IISSION ! . .:.r Sectior4=1 • Appellant 1. Name, address and telephone number of appellant: Sierra Club 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 419 Sacramento, California 95814 916 444-9132 Zip Area Code) Telephone No. 2. Name, address and telephone number of appellant's representative, if any: Norbert H. Dall, Coastal/Land Use Coordinator same as above ( ) ~ip (Area Code}(Telephone No.) Section II. Decision of Regional Commission Being A?oealed 1. Name of Regional Commission: South Coast Regional Commission 2. Date of Regional Commission's decision: June 26, 1978 --------------------------------- Regional Coi:mnission File Number: --------------------------------------- P-78-3184 3. 4. Brief description of development being appealed: Three mile long, 84 inch diameter sewer interceptor 1 ine .. t . '.".: ... "": ~··) '; , 5. Brief description of development location (city or county, nearest roads,. etc..).: 41ong :the: seaward side of PCH between Lake Street and Sewage Treatment Plant #2 in Huntington Beach 6. Describe decision of the Regional Commission (e.g. approval, denial, approval with conditions, etc.): Approval .. with conditions Section III. Identification and Notification of Other Interested Parties 1. State the names and addresses of the fo~lowing p~rties. Use additional paper if necessary: a. The name and address of the permit applicant: See Attachment 1 . b. 'l'he governing body of each county, city and other local government agencies having jurisdiction of the project area: See Attachment 1 . c. Names and addresses of all persons who expressed support or opposition to the development and provided their names and addresses to the Regional Commission or are otherwise known by the a~pellant to have an interest in the matter appeaied: ~ ... See Attachment 1. TO BE COMPLETED BY COMMISSION: Appeal No. Date Filed: ----------------- -··~·--·· --· ·-··· .. -.. ~ ...... ·• -------·-·--~ .. ---.. ·:. . .. _. ·-··· -....... ___ .. -···-·· .. -·· ............ _... .. ----···---·-.. . -2- ... Section IV. Statement of Facts to Demonstrate Substantial Issue ~ The appellant must demonstrate to the State Commission that a substantial iss~e . ~s raised by the appeal, an issue of such concern that it warrants a new hearing o~ the application by the CoII!I!lission. The appellant's failure to set forth in sufficient detail the facts upon which the appeal is based, and the reasons the appellant believes the decision of the Regional Commission to be inconsistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act, may result in rejection of the appeal on . groun¢3 that the presence of' a substantial issue has not been demonstrated. Due to the short deadlines provided in.the Coa3tal Act, review of your appeal will not be possible unless a complete and fully-substantiated appeal is submitted at this time. · Check applicable reason(s) why you believe the State Commission should hear the appeal. (In general, the Commission has not found that an appeal presents a substantial issue that warrants hearing unless one of ~he following factors is present.) X 1. The. deveiopment presents a statewide planning issue on which guidance of the S~te Commission is·required and the matter is of statewide significance. 2. The decision of the Regional Commission adversely affects coastal -----x resource·s o~ the proper public use of resources, contrary to specific provisions ~i: the. Co~tai Act of l.976; : .. .. .. : ~ : ________ 3. The decision of the Regional Cormnission is inco!lSistent with previous •• ~ ; • • • -~ J .. • • • ••• \ .. .decisions of the State Commission. o:; did '.no~, adequatelY. .. address issues covered by the· interpretive guidelines adopted by the State Co~ssion. ____ 4. The proceedings of the Regional Commission were materially affected by inaccurate factual infonnation or procedural error and therefore resulted in ., -- a decision contrary to the policies of the Coastal Act of 1976. ---~5· The decision of the Regional Commission should be changed because of new factual information, relating to co~stal issues, and this information could not reasonably have been presente~ to the Regional Commission. ____ 6. Other (Specify in detail) ____________ _... ______ _ Attach a complete , concise statement of facts substantiating the alleged reasons ~tra.rranting hearing of the appeal by the State Commission and reversal or modifi- cation of the decision of the Regional Commission. ( :? • .. ·~ ! ' t Secti~n V. Certification I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I understand that any misstatement or omission of the infor.nation requested --~y be -grounds ror rejection o:r this· aplfea~~.--=/. -.. ---u -•• --. -- DATED July 10, 1978 ./~._-4"-<:-. A-# ~ _ ..7-:>ignature of appellant rep _santative / !'4orbert H. Dall Revised 2/17/77 ---·---___ .... _...-..... _. •--..•+•••• I l l· I• I I I t- i SIERRA CLUB CALIFORNIA COASTAL TASK FORCE SIERRA CLUB APPEAL OF P-78-3184 (ORANGE COUN1Y SANITATION DISTRICT #11) THE SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION DECISION IN P-78-3184 ADVERSELY .AFFEC+S.COASTAL RESOURCES CONTRARY TO COASTAL ACT SECTIONS 30250, 30254, 30604, AND 30240. THE PROPOSED SEWER TRUNKLINE, CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY AND CillIDLATIVELY, PRESENTS AN ISSUE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE ON WHICH THE GUIDANCE OF THE STATE COASTAL COMMISSION IS NEEDED. The substantial issue raised by this appeal of the South Coast Regional Conunission decision concerning application P-78-3184 (Orange County Sanitation District fill) is that the three mile long, 84'' inch diameter sewer interceptor line is an integral part of the sewage system and Bolsa Chica annexation program of the City of Huntington Beach and as such will have significant adverse effects ~ on coastal resources. According to the Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan for Sewers, The sewer facilities are proposed for construction in both developed and undeveloped areas of Huntington Beach and along the southeastern portion of the unincorporated Bolsa Chica area. They have been designed to accomodate anticipated grot:th in the City of Huntington Beach, in accordance with the City's existing zoning maps and plans of the Signal Landmark Company for the Bolsa Chica area. (Cited in South Coast Regional Commission Staff Summary and Recommendations, page 3. Emphasis added.) Similarly, the City of Huntington Beach local coastal program issue identi- fication (November 17, 1977) stated, The proposed Master Plan of Sewers, City of Huntington Beach indicates a trunk sewer is proposed for the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway from Brookhurst Street north to Lake Street. Connecting to this portion is the Ocean Avenue trunk and a branch draining northern Huntington Beach through or around Bolsa Chica. These are proposed to serve projected need. (Page 36~ emphasis added.) In addition, Orange County Sanitation District Sewer Treatment Plant 112, into which this trunkline will feed, is undergoing expansion to provide 75 million ·~ SIERRA CLUB APPEAL OF P-78-3184 ·~ Page 2 gallons per day of treatment capacity. Although the City's issue identification (Page 36) indicates that the discharge will receive secondary treatment, oral testimony by District representative Mr. Dennis Reid before the South Coast Regional Commission in response to questioning by Dr. Rimrnon Fay indicated that the District has applied for a waiver of the secondary treatment requirement for deep water discharge. In addition, Mr. Reid told the Regional Commission that by the year 2000, the District plans to be able to discharge. a maximum of 260 million gallons per day. Various planning efforts have identified the need to protect the restorable Bolsa Chica wetlands from encroaching residential develop~ent. Development of the Coast Trunk Sewer, of which the present application is an integral part, would bring the Huntington Beach sewage system to the very Bolsa Chica area "that the City is proposing to annex. (See, for instance, Local Coastal Program Issue Identification, pages 20-21.) That annexation, as this sewer project, is anticipated by the.City to be completed prior to certification of the local coastal program. For these reasons, the Sierra Club asks the Coastal Commission to fully consider the cumulative impacts of permitting this sewer line segment, as provided for in Coastal Act section 30250. We submit that this project will facilitate and encourage Bolsa Chica marsh and bluff area development prior to the time when the City's and/or the County's local coastal program(s) have determined the kinds, locations, and intensities of use(s) consistent with protecting the natural ~ values of the area. We therefore further submit that the present application does not ~eet the test in Coastal Act section 30254, which states in relevant part that "New or expanded public works facilities shall be designed and limited to accomodate needs generated by development or uses permitted consistent with the provisions of this division••••" The City's Issue Identification itself (Page 38) raises the question of properly relating sewage system capacity to Coastal Act development limitations and priorities when it lists as one "issue to study con- cerning sewage" the "effects on growth patterns of proposals for extension and additional services?" and concomitant query, "Is available sewer capacity attracting development?" -~-.~. . .: ! : L~"-.. , . · :i· ... . . .. ~ . Because the City has identified the issue of its sewage system as one warranting further investigation in its local coastal program, the present application conflicts directly with the provision of Coastal Act section 30604 which requires that permitted development shall not prejudice the ability of a local government to prepare its local coastal program in conformity with the policies of Coastal Act chapter 3. Finally, the construction of the sewer line on the seaward side of Pacific Coast Highway will impact the sand dunes and (perhaps) the Coreopsis that have been reported there. Coastal Act section 30240(a), however, protects such environmentally sensiti~e areas against destruction and provides that only uses ' .. .. ._ SIERRA CLUB APPEAL OF P-78-3184 Page 3 dependent upon such resources may be allowed there. Since the sewer line could be located on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway, such an alternative should be considered if the project in its present or some future configuration is permitted. l\J. J.t\vrff1un .a. J. INTERESTED PARTIES IN P-78-3184 (ORANGE COUNIY SANITATION DISTRICT #11) /"'I Applicant: City: Commission: Parties: ~ ,: <;) ·L: Ci: -, . ..... --~ N LL! ..... or--.! c· ' ·':.;? ::5 t·. ~ . (( . u co r-.. Orange County Sanitation District #11 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Mr. Dennis M. Reid Orange County Sanitation District #11 Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Mr. Ed Selich Planning Director City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 HuntinBton Beach, California 92648 South Coast Regional Coastal Conunission P.O. Box 1450 Long Beach, California 90801 Rhoda and Ken Martin 17041 Courtney Lane Huntington Beach, California 92649 '. / ' I • ~ ( I i ALL l DISTRICTS -ITEM NO. AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE 'SOLIDS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT As r epor ted to the Directors at the June Board Meeting, the staff is actively engaged in securing a more permanent means of disposal for the digested sewage solids processed at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Recent discussions held with the Regional Water Qua lity Control Board, State and County Health Departments, C~unty Solid Waste Management Division and representatives from the Irvine Company have resulted in concurrance with the plan of composting our sludges at the Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill until 1981, at which time the landfill wi ll be clos.ed and the County's lease with t he Irvine Company wi ll be terminated. After 1981, t he staff is pursuing the feasibi lity of composting and disposal of our sludges at a future solid waste disposal site to be operated by the Solid Waste Ma nagement Division. Composting operations are planned . to commence no later than October 1 of this year and staff has been seeking the necessary equipment required for this operation. At the June Meeting, authorization was approved for the purchase of a rototiller in an amount not to exceed $51,000. The staff has located two additional pieces of equipment required for the composting operation. A used grader (blade) and loader have been located and are avai lable for purchase . Staff is requesting authority to purchase a used grader in the amount not to exceed $40,000 (new unit cost $115,000) and a loader , also in an amount not to exceed $40,000 (new price $217,000). ITEM NO. HEADS -AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE GAS ENGINE CYLINDER Presently we have nine Waukesha dual fuel. gas engines for the main sewage pump drives at Plant No.· 2. : Recent repairs to two of the engines have depleted many of the spare parts which are maintained for emergency, as well as scheduled maintenance on these critical drive units·~ Staff is requesting authority for the General Manager to negoti.ate for the purchase of· twelve cylinder head replacement.units ~or these gas engines in an amount not to exceed $20,000. There is normally a lo~g purchase time for these units. ITEM No.· . . . -AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR PAVEMENT REPAIRSI HOUSE LATERAL EXTENSIONS AND RELATED WORK Under the present purchasing resolution, the staff is required to solicit three competitive bids for services in excess of $500, but·less than $4,500. There have been many instances, particularly in the past few months, where pavement failures resulting from the heavy rainfall, along with extensions of house laterals and other related work have not been accomplished in a reasonable period of time to minimize the impacts and inconveniences to the pubiic. These delays are the result of securi~g competitive quotations for this critical type of work. Many contractors have failed to quote competitively on this type of work because of the unknowns associated with the repair work. Staff is, .therefore, requesting authority to secure the ·most competitive and available contractor·to perform pavement .repairs,. _house later.al extensions, adjustment of manhole frames and covers, and other similar work to minimize the impacts and inconveniences .to the public. This authorization would only wiave the provision of competitive quotations in these instances and would not cha~ge th~ purchasing resolution with the limita- tions presently· contained therein. .. ,_. ITEM NO. -APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF SECONDARY TREATMENT ·. REQUIREMENTS In March, the Boards authorized the General Man~ger to engage consultants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purpose of gathering the required information to submit an application to the EPA for waiver of secondary treatment requirements for marine discharge. Subsequ.ently, at the April Meeting, the Directors approved initial work to conunence by John Carollo Engineers, in an amount not to exceed $7,500, and by Southern California Coastal Water Re.search Project in an amount not to exceed $15,000. The staff has reviewed the EPA r~gulations concerni~g.the application· and the various tasks required for the submittal of ·the application to be filed with EPA no later . than September 24 of this year. Included with this ~genda material is an itemized total bu~get in the amount of $125,000. Various tasks required in the gatheri~g of the material have been ass~gned to those firms and individuals who can best assist the staff in this effort. JCE, SCCWRP, Dr. Norman Brooks and Dr. Koh are familar with the Districts' operational procedures and are knowle~geable of the effects of the wastewater discha~ge to the Pacific Ocean. JCE is also knowle~geable as to the performance of the treatment·plant facilities and will assist the· staff in prepari~g the effects· of the pre-treatment pr~grams which affect.the industrial waste s~gment of·our wastewaters. J. ·B. Gilbert and Associates and Kris Lindstrom (a former employee of J. B. Gilbert) are both knowle~geable of the Districts' EIS and the secondary impacts which.have been detailed in the EIS. Several maps and charts will be required which cannot be done by staff within the time limits required. The EPA has requested a very extens.ive analysis of the wastewaters to determine the ·- -~ -· levels of over 100 toxic compounds •. Many of these compounds cannot be analyzed by the Districts' laboratory and may require the services of an outside laboratory. The staff feels.that this may be an unnecessary requirement in the application and will be discussing the matter with .·EPA officials for clarifica- tion. In the event it is an effort which must be performed, it is felt that the analysis must be made by a laboratory which is approved by the EPA. It is,. therefore, the staff's recommendation that the budget be approved as submitted and that authorization be. given to the consultants listed therein in the amounts shown for a total not to exceed $125,000. It is the staff's understanding in discussi~g the prepa~ation of the waiver application with the City of San Di~go apd. consultants employed by the City of San Francisco· that their bu~get amount is in excess of $300,000. , tTEM No.· -SURPLUS CEMENT MIXERS During the late spring and sununer of 1976, Districts' personnel were processing and composting digested sewage solids at Plant No. 2. Two used cement mixing trucks were purchased to aid in this operation. With the purchase of the additional sludge handling and processing equipment, the staff feels that the cement mixers are .surplus. Staff is requesting authority to dispos~ of the two cement mixing trucks in the most cost effective manner. : ITEM NO. -COMPLETION OF FOSTER OUTFALL BOOSTER PUMPING STATION -JOB NO. J-6-1 In September, 1974, one bid was received for the installation of two additional pumping units complete with engine drives and gear boxes to be added to the Foster Outfall Booster Pumping Station at Plant No. 2. One bid was received in the amount of $1,678,100, which was excessive and over the engineer's estimate. Based on the staff's recommendation, the Boards rejected the one bid and directed the staff to accomplish the work be force account and to negotiate £or the purchase of proprietary equipment required for the project. Four equipment installation contracts have been awarded in assisting the Districts to complete the work as authorized. The project is nearing completion and it is estimated that the final work, including the Districts' engineering, administration and inspection and overhead, will cost $109,200, for a total estimated final cost of '$1,586,504. Staff recommends that the Boards approve the completion cost estimate in order that this project can be finished as soon as possible. ITEM No.· -ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 78 At the February Meeting, the Board initiated annexation pro- ceedings for Tract No. 9874, which is located in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Sunnymead Street in the City of Orange. ~he Tract~is approxi~ately 11.033 acres and will . . contain sixteen single family residen.ces with a minimum lot area of 20,000 squ~re feet. The proposed development is in conformity to the Districts'· Master Plan for land use and the local sewers will be served by the City of Orange. Staff therefore recommends approval of Resol.ution No. 78·-· · · -7 orderi~g· annexation of this parcel·to the District. All necessary fees have been paid by the proponent. ITEM No.· -AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF RENTAL OF PLANETARY GEAR UNIT FOR CENTRIFUGES In the fall of last year the staff felt with cha~ging the gear ratios on the Bird Centrifuge Machines at Plant No. 2, a more efficient operation could be realized. Plaentary gear units .from Bird Machinery Company were rented at a ~rice· of $680 per month.· The evaluation of this cha~ge in gear ratios extended for a greater period than a~ticipated and it is, therefore, the sbaff's recommendation that the Board approve the rental of these gear units for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,000 DISTRICT NO·. 7-ITEM NO. INITIATTON OF· ANNEXATION NO.: 'ST :-: TRACT :g·4:07 At the June Board Meeting the Directors referred to staff· for study and recoinmendation.the application from E~gewater Develop- ment Company for the annexation of -6.218 acres of terri~ory located in the vicinity of Rand~ll Street and Kennymead Street in·the City of Orange. The proposed development is for e~ght single·family residences with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet per lot. This proposed development has been approved by the City of Ora~ge. The development is in con- formance with 'the·· District's Master Plan and staff, therefore, . recommends· adoption· of Resolution No. 1a·-· -7 initiati~g proceedings for this annexation. .- DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. ANNEXATION NO. 34 -TRACT NO. 10011 Warmington Development Company .and The Baldwin· Company have requested annexation of 16-5.676 acres of territory located in the City of Yorba Linda, near the future intersection of Yorba Linda.Drive and Village Center Drive. This matter was received and filed at the June Board Meeting and referred to staff for report. The City of Yorba Linda approved the EIR on ~his proposed development in September of last year, and approved the tract map at the same time. The design of the proposed development was reviewed and approved by the City in February of this year. The proposed development will contain 341 single family units and will be served by the City of Yorba Linda and the Yorba Linda County Water District. This proposed development_ .generally conforms to the District's Master Plan. Staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No. 1a·-· · -2 initiating proceedings for this proposed annexation. \ \_ 7-12-78 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN .. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND FISCAL POLICY . -. . COMMITTEE FOR WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1978 -5:30 P.M,J TO GIVE THE STAFF SOME ADDITIONAL DIRECTION FOR PREPARATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT BUDGETS, NORMALLY WE WOULD HAVE MET ON JULY 26TH, INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: DAVID ORTIZ ~-· ~::: ::::~~ PERHAPS YOU WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THE ATTACHED PRESS RELEASE FROM SENATOR CRANSTON'S OFFICEJ AND THE LETTER FROM THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO SENATOR CRANSTON, 11-I -THE STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR BE MOVED TO ITEM 12 FOR DISCUSSION. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGU LAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COU NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,_ 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour . of 7:30 p.m ., July 12 , 19 78 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Va l ley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary report e d a quorum present. DISTRIC! 1 Adjournment * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 1 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m, July 12, 1978 . DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sa nitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978. The Chairman th en declared the meeting so ad j ourn ed at 8:38 p.m., July 12, 1978. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County San itation District No. 5 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978. The Ch airman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8 :4 1 p.m., July 12, 1978. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Mov ed, second e d and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Dire ctors of County Sanitation District No. 6 b e ad journe d to 6 :00 p.m., July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the mee ting so ad journed at 8 :41 p.m., July 12, 19 78 1 DI ST RICT 7 Adjournment Mov e d, seconded and duly carried: That this mee ting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., July 19, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8 :41 p .m., July 12, 197 8 . DI STR ICT 11 Adjourn ment Mov e d , second ed a nd duly carried: That this meeting of t h e Board of Directors of County Sanit ation District No . 11 be ad journe d to 6:00 p.m., J uly 19, 197 8 . The Cha i r man th en dec l ared the mee tin g s o adjourned a t 8 :43 p.m., July 12, 1978 . DIS TR ICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meet ing of the Board of Directors of County Sani t ation District No . 2 be ad journed to 6:00 p.m., Jul y 19, 1978. The Chairman then decl a red the meeting so a djou~n ed a t 9:08 p .m., Jul y 12, 1978. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of July , 19 78 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set (han a/th. s 12;th day of July 19 78 I Mt TJ~G DATE July 12, 1978 · TIME 7:30 p.m. D J s TR I c Ts --=I~, 2=-..lllUl3._,.,...._5~, 6~,~7...,.,. lt.-1~1..___ DI T~ICT 1 i CRANK} •••••••• RI MA •••••••• _L_ - WELSH). ••••••• SHARP •••••• -~ ---- R l"tEY). ••••••• ANTHONY. • • • •. ~ --__ ORT I z). ....... EVANS....... ----· DISTRICT 2 FRIED) ••••••• -WEDAA ••••••• ~ ---- RASHFORD) ••••• HOLT. • • • • • • • V-__ -- R l LEY) •••••••• CLARI~ ••••••• ~ ---- COOPER) ••••••• Fox .•••..••• ~ ---- ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM ••••• -~ ___ _ .WELLS).· ••••••• HOUSTON ••••• V ___ _ EVANS)······· .. eft'f I z. · · · · · · V'" ___ _ CULV~R) ••••••• PERRY·· • •••• V----- ROTH •• • • • • • • ·SEYMOUR· • • • • Q... ___ _ HOYT • • • • ~ • • • ·SM I TH· • • • • • ·--1.L-___ _ ADLER) •••••••• STANTON ••••• _IL. ___ _ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ •• -~ __ .-- DJSTRI CT 3 (ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD •••• __l.L ___ _ (MEYER) •••••• •• GR I FF IN···· ·-LL"""--__ lPERRY) ......... CULVER.· ••• ·~----. _ (COOPER) •••••• -GAMBINA • • • • ·~ ___ _ LACAYO)······· HUpSON • • • • • -~ ___ _ SE ITZJ ••. ·····LASZLO····· ·--k::::. ___ _ WE I SHAU PT) •••• MILLER ••••• ·~ ___ _ FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON ••••••• ~ EVANS) •••••••• 9RTJZ •••••• -~ == == NYBORG) ••••••• PR I ESl ••••• -~ · YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET....... ~== == RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT ••••• -~ ROTH) ••••••••• SEYMOUR ••••• Q..J ---- SHENK.MAN),. •••• s.I.E~ERT. •••• ,/== == ZOMMI CKJ. ••••• 3 t tv I A ••••• -~ VELASQUEZ) •••• WJNTERS ••••• ~== == DISTRICT 5 ~fiUMMEd ••••••• RYCKOFF ••••• __tL ---- ANTHONY)····· ·RI LEY······ ·--1L. ---- RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • -~ ---- DISTRICT 6 ( RYCKOf F) .•••.. MC INNIS •••• ~ ___ _ {CRANK) .•••••••• RIMA ••••••• -~ ___ _ {R l LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ~ ---- DI STRJ CT 7 . (GAIDo). • • • • • • ·VARDOULI·s. • ~ ----~HOYT) •••• •••• 0 SMI TH.·.· •• ·~ ___ _ RI LEY)······· -CLARI<·······~. ___ _ ORTIZ)········ -EV/\NS. •·• • • • • ... V ·--__ (HUTCH I SON)· •• -GLOCKNER.··-._~ -·--__ (WELSH).··.· •• -SALTARELLI· .__iL. ___ _ (RYCKOFf). ·····WILLIAMS···-~ ---- DISTRICT 11 BAILEY) ••••••• SHENKMAN ••• -.....lL ___ _ SHENKMAN) ••••• PATT I NSON •• .--JL ___ _ RI LEY)······· ·SCHMJT • • • • • .__iL ___ _ 6/14/78 JOINT BOARDS (RJLEY • ········ANTHONY·•··-~ -- • • • • • • • • ...CLARIC • • • • • ·~ -- PERRY • • • • • • • • ·CULVER· • • • • -'L--- ORTIZ • • • • • • • • ·EVANS· • • • • • __!L_ -- COOPER)········ FOX······· ._,L_ -- COOPER) • • • • • • • • GAMB I NA· • • • ~ -- HUTCH I SON)···· ·GLOCKNER·· .__!L. -- ROGET) • • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • --J.L. -- (MEYER) •• : •••••• qR IF FIN····~ -- (RASHFORD) ···•··HOLT······-~ -- (WELLS)········· HOUSTON···-~ -- (LACAYO)········ HUDSON···· .. ~ -- SEITZ)• • ·······LASZLO···· ._;L_ -- RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS·· ·--4.L. -- WE I SHAUPT) ·····MILLER·····~ __ FINLAYSON}. • • • ·OLSON· • • • • • ,,,,.,-__ E¥API S ) • • • • • • • • ··0RTI l · · · · · · _::::__ __ . SHENKMAN)····· ·PATTINSON•-~ __ CULVER)········ PERRY··•···~ __ NYBORG)········PRIEST·····~ __ ANTHOt-IY) • • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • --1c::::.. __ (CRANKY········· RIMA·······~ __ ~YOUNG)········· ROGET····· •__i.L_ __ HUMME~) •••••••• RYCKOFF···· V--__ WELSH) •••••• • • ·SAL TAR ELLI· ____IL_ __ RI LEY) ••••••••• SCHMIT····· ,_........ ~ROTH) •••••••••• SEYMOUR·~·· a_, == WELSH)···.······ SHARP······~ __ BAILEY)······· ·SHENKMAN··-~ __ ~SHENl<MAN) • • ····SI EBERT·····~--· HOYT)· • • • • • • • ··SMITH· • • • • ·~ __ ADLER)····.····· STANTON····~ (RYCKOFF) • • • ····STRAUSS··· "-LL" --~ADLER)········· SVALSTAD· • -~ == ZOMMI CK) •••••• -SVbl'I.0 , • • • ·~ GAIDO) •• • •• • • • • VARDOULI S • • ~ -- WINTERS) •••••• ·VELASQUEZ· • ....,....---- ~FR I ED) ••• ••••• 0 WEDAA· • • • • • ..........., -- RYCKOFF) ······-WILLIAMS··· ...........--- VELASQUEZ)· • • • • ;;1 NTERS • • • • ...,,...-.-== OTHERS HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER •• -- LEW JS ••••• ·-- CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN ••••• ·-- WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER ••• ·-- HOWARD •••• ·-- HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH ••••• ·-- KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH ••••• ·-- MADDOX ••••• __ MART I NSON •• __ PI ER SALL. •• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ MEETJNG DATE July 12, 1978 · TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1.2,3,S,6,Z,&11 DISTRICT 1 ~ C.RANK) •••••••• RI MA ••••••• ·~ -- WELSH) •••••••• SHARP. • • • • • • --__ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY. • • • •. --__ ORTI z) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ·----__ · DISTRICT 2 . FR I ED) ••••••• -WEDAA ••••••• L ---- RASHFORD) ••••• HOLT ••••••• -~--__ RILEY) •••••••• CLARK •••••• -~ ----- COOPER) ••••••• FOX ••••••••• __iL_ __ -- ROGET) ......... GRAHAM •••••• v ___ _ .WELLS).· ••••••• HOUSTON ••••• ...JL:_ ___ _ EVANS)·.·····.~ ••••••• ---J.L_ ___ _ CULV~R) ·······PERRY.·····-~ --__ ROTH ••• • ~ • • • ·SEYMOUR· • • • ·~ ___ _ HOYT • • • ······SMITH·······~ ___ _ ADLER) •••••••• STANTON ••••• .JE_/ ___ _ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ •• ·~--__ DISTRICT 3 . . ADLER .• ••••••• SVALSTAD ••• -~ ___ _ MEYER) ••• • • • • ·GR.I FF IN· • • • • ___ _ PERRY) •••••••• CULVER······ COOPER) •••••• -GAMBINA •••• • v ---- LACAYO) • • • • • • • HUpSON • • • • • -~ == == SEITZ) •••• ••• ·LASZLO······ ___ _ WE J SHAU PT) •••• MILLER •••••• FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON·.···.· ~---- EVANS) •••••••• iJtl I Z....... ---- NYBORG) • • • • • • ~ Ifl~ •• • • • -~---- YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET •••••• ·-~-== == RI LEY) •••••••• SCHMIT ••••• ·17':' ROTH) ••••••••• SEYMOUR ...... ~---- SHEtJKi-1AN) ,.; •••• S 1. f:BER I .• ~-·C?' == == Z.OMMI CKJ. ••••• ~ LV,A •••••• ·~ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS..... __ == DISTRICT 5 fiUMMEL • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • • V ___ _ ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·······~ ---- RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ·~ ---- DISTRICT 6 {RYCKOfF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• ~ {CRANK)_ •••••••• RIMA ••••••••. V == == (RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ~---- DISTRICT 7 GAIDO ••••••• -~ARDOULl.S·. V-__ -- HOYT) ••••••••• SMITH....... V ___ _ RILEY)······· -Gt:MK. • • • • • • ~---__ ORTJ z) • ·•• .• ···EVANS·.·· •••• ~--__ HUTCH I SON) •• • -GLOCKNER.... ___ _ WELSH) •••••••• SALTARELLI.. ___ _ RYCKOFF) •••••• wJLLIAMS····---V-___ _ DISTRICT 11 BAILEY) ••••••• SHENKMAN •••• ~ SHENKMAN) ••••• PATT I NSON ••• --;::?"---- R 1 LEY) ········SCHMIT······ jz" == 6/lll/78 JOINT BOARDS ~RJLEY~·········ANTHONY····-1L __ RI LEY • • • • • • • • ·C~· • • • • ·~ -- PERRY • ········CULVER·····~ -- ORTIZ • ········EVANS······~ -- COOPER) • • • • • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • __iL__ -- COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • ._17'_ -- HUTCH I SON)···· ·GLOCKNER··-~ -- ROGET) • • • ·• • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ...iL_ --. v (MEYER) ...... •• ••qRIFFIN····-v -- (RASHFORD) ···•··HOLT······ ·---- WELLS)········· HOUSTON···-~ -- LACAYO)········ HUDSON···· ... ~ -- SEITZ) • • • • • • • • ·LASZLO· • • • ·4 --RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS···~ __ WEISHAUPT) .• ••• ·MILLER·····~ FINLAYSON) • • • • ·OLSON· • • • • ·--__ ~) ......... ~ ...... _:::::::__ --- SHEN KMAN)······ PATTINSON· ·-1L __ CULVER)········ PERRY····· ._tL __ NYBORG) •••••••• flai®ST·····~ AN,THO~Y) • • • • • • • FM5¥ · · · · · ·-- CRANKf· • • • • • • • • RfMA· • • • • • • ~ YOUNG)·········ROGET······~ HUMMEtJ • • • • • • • • RYCKOFF· • • ·~== WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI·~ RI LEY) ••••••••• SCHMIT····· ~- (ROTH) •••••••••• SEYMOUR·~· .7J:J -- (WELSH)········· SHARP····· .--V --~BAI LEY)·.······· SHENKMAN··-~- SHENKMAN)······ SI EBERT·····~ HOYT)·········· SMITH······~ == ADLER) ••• ·• ·····STANTON···· V RYCKOfF) ••••••• sTRAUSS····~ == ADLER) ••••••••• svALSTAD··· ~ ZOMMICK) • • • • • • 0 SVL't'IA10 • • • -~- GAIDO) ••• • •• • • • VARDOULI S • -~ -- WINTERS) ••••• •• VELASQUEZ·· ~-- FR I ED)········· WEDAA • • • • • ·~ -- RYCKOFF) ••••••• WILLI AMS···~-- VELASQUEZ)····· ;:INTERS····-I/_ == OTHERS . ( ) ()fl I~. /.(t/) j);Y/'- f~ • I·. ~.;,- ( ' / • e (: 'l ', HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER •• __ LEWIS ••••• ·-- CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN ••••• ·-- WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER ••• ·-- HOWARD ••••• __ HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH ••••• ·-- KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••••• __ MADDOX ••••• __ MARTINSON •• __ Pl ERSALL ••• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ MEE! ING DATE July 12, 1978 DISTRICT 1 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1.2,3,5,6.7.&11 ~CRANK) •••••••• RIMA ••••••• ·------ WELSH). ••••••• SHARP •••••• ·------ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··----- ORTIZ). ••••••• EVANS •••••• ·-----· DISTRJCT 2 FR I ED) • • • • • • • • WEDAA • • • • • • ·------ RASH FORD). •••• tiOL T. •••••• ·------ RI LEY) •••••••• CLARK •••••• ·------ COOPER) ••••••• FOX •••••••• ·------ ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ·--___ _ .WELLS).-••••••• HOUSTON •••• ·--___ _ EVANS)······· ·ORTIZ·······------CULV~R) ·······PERRY·······--.--__ ROTH ••• • • • • • ·SEYMOUR· • • • ·--___ _ HOYT • • • ·:····SMITH·······--___ _ ADLER) •••••••• ST ANTON •••• ·--___ _ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ·· ·--__ .-- DI STRl CT 3 (ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD • • • ·--___ _ (MEYER) •••••• • -GRIFFIN·····--___ _ lPERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·--___ _ (COOPER) ••••• • -GAMBINA • • • • ·--___ _ LACAYO)······· HUDSON······--___ _ SE I TZJ ••. ·····LASZLO······--___ _ WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER ••••• ·--___ _ FINLAYSON} •••• QLSON ••••••• EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ······.------ NYBORG) ••••••• PR I EST •••••• ------ YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET ••••••• ====:======== RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT •••••• ROTH) ••••••••• SEYMOUR ••••• ------ SHENK.MAN): •••• SI EBERT •••• ·==== ==== ==== ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA •••••• VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS..... ==== ==== DISTRICT 5 ~f-IUMMEd • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------ ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·······------ RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ·------ D JSTR I CT 6 (RYCKOfF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• _____ _ (CRANK) .•••••• ~ .RIMA •••••••• _. ____ _ (RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• '------ D JSTRI CT 7 {GAJDO) • • • • • • • ·VARDOULIS· • -----(HOYT) •••• •••• -SMITH···· •• ·--___ _ (RILEY)······· ·CLARK·······--___ _ (ORTIZ)···· .• •• -EVANS····· •• ·--___ _ ~HUTCHISON) •••• GLOCKNER.·.·--___ _ WELSH) •••••••• SALTARELLI.·--___ _ RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS····--__ -- DISTRICT 11 . BAILEY) ••••••• SHENKMAN •••• SHENKMAN) ••••• PATTINSON ••• ------ RILEY) ········SCHMIT······ · ==== ==== 6/14/78 JOINT BOARDS (RJLEY~·········ANTHONY····--- !RILEY • ········CLARK······---- PERRY • ········CULVER·····---- ORTIZ • • ·······EVANS······---- COOPER)········ FOX········---- COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • ·---- (HUTCH I SON)· ····GLOCKNER···---- (ROGET)··· ······GRAHAM·····---- (MEYER)··:·•···• GRI Ff IN·~··---- (RASHFORD) • • ·•··HOLT·· • • • • ·---- (WELLS)········· HOUSTON····---- (LACAYO)········ HUDSON·····---- !SEITZ)•······· ·LASZLO·····---- RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS···---- WE I SHAU PT).· • • • ·MILLER· • • • ·--__ FINLAYSON) • • • • ·OLSON· • • • • ·--__ EVANS)········ ·ORTIZ······--__ _ (SHENKMAN)······ PATTINSON··--__ ~CULVER)········ PERRY······--__ NYBORG) • • • • • • • ·PR I EST·· • • ·--__ ANTHOt:JY) • • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • ·--__ ~RANK)·· • ······RI MA·······--__ ~YOUNG)········· ROGET· .. ···--__ HUMMEtJ • • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • ·--__ WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI· RILEY) ••••••••• SCHMIT····.---- (ROTH) •••••••••• SE:-r'MOUR · ~ • .---- (WELSH)···.······ SHARP······==== ==== SBAI LEY) •••••••• SHENKMAN ••• __ -- \SHENl<MAN) • • • • ··SI EBERT·· • ··--__ . (HOYT) ••. ·······SMITH······ (ADLER)····.····· STANTON···.---- (RYCKOFF) • • • • • ··STRAUSS·· • .---- (ADLER)········ ·SVALSTAD· • .---- ~ZOMMI CK)······· SYLVIA····.---- GAIDO) ••• • •• • • • VARDOULI S • .---- WINTERS) •••••• ·VELASQUEZ· .---- ~FR I ED)········· WEDAA • • • • • .---- RYCKOFF) ······-WILLIAMS··.---- VELASQUEZ)····· t:INTERS • • • ·==. ==. OTHERS HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER.·-- LEWJ S ••••• ·-- CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN ••••• ·-- WOODRUFF ••• __ HOHENER •••• __ HOWARD ••••• __ HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH •••••• __ KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••••• __ MADDOX ••••• __ MARTINSON •• __ Pl ERSALL. •• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS ••• ·-- M[E.'TJ ,NG DATE J'...lly 1 2, 1978 TIM E 7:30 p.m. DIST R I C TS 1.2 .3 ,5,6 .7.&ll I DI ~]lCT 1 !cn 1i:T1K) .....••. RIMA ...••.•. __ ---- WE L SH) .•••.... SHARP ....•. ·--___ _ R I L EY) ........ J\NTHONY ...... ____ _ ORTI Z ) ........ EVANS ..... ··--____ · DISTRICT 2 FR I ED) .. -~~.·· .WEDAA ...•.. ·------ RA S HF ORD ) ..... HOLT ........ _____ _ R IL EY) ...•.•.. CLARK ....... _____ _ COOPER) ....... Fox ........ ·------ ROGET) ••••.... GRAHAM ...... _____ _ .\'/ELLS) ........ HOUSTON .•... _____ _ EVANS)······· ·ORTIZ·······--___ _ CUL V~R) · · . · · · ·PERRY· · · · · · ·--___ _ RO TH ..... · ... SEYMOUR·· .. ·--___ _ HOYT · · · ······SM ITH······· ADLERJ ........ STANTON ..... ------ WI NTERS) ...... VELASQUEZ .. ·====== DI STRIC T 3 ~ADLER)-~ .... SVALSTAD •... ~M EYER)" ........ GRIFFIN·····====== PE RRY) ........ CULVER ..... . COOPER) ....... GAM B INA .• · .. ------ ~~CA Y Q) · · · · · · ·HUD~ON· · · · · ·== == == St IT Z) ....... ·LAS L LO · · ·· · · WE I SHAU P T) .... MIL LER······====== FINLAYSON) .... OLSON ...•.•. EVANS) ....•... ORTIZ ...•.•. ------ NYBORG) ....... PR I EST ...•.. ------. YOUNG) .....••. ROG ET ...•.. ·== == == R I L EY) ........ SCHMIT ...•.. ROTH) ......... SEYMOUR ..... ------ SHE ~l K.f·1AN),. .... SIEBERT .... ·====== ZOM MICKJ .•.... SYLVJA ....•. VELASQUEZ) .... WI NTERS .•... ------ DI STRICT 5 lliUMMEd ....... RYCKOFF .... ·------ ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY·······------ RYCKOFF) ······STRAUSS·····--___ _ DIST RICT 6 (RYC KOf F) ...... MC INNIS ... . (C RANK) •....... RIM A •.••.. ··====== (R I LEY) ...•.... ANTHONY .... .___ ---- DI STRJ CT 7 lGAI D o~. · · · ·~AR D OUL I S·. ~ ---- (HOYT ).· .. ··•· .SMITH·······--___ _ (R I LEY)····.·· .CL ARK-······--___ _ (O RTI Z)······. ·E VA NS .····· .• (HUT CH I SON) .... GLOC KNE R .... ------ (W E LSH)·· .. · ... SALTARE LLI.·====== (RYCKOFF). ·····WILLIAMS····--___ _ DIST RIC T 11 BAI LE Y) ....... SH E NKMAN ... . SH ENKM AN) ...•. P ATTIN SO N ... ------ (RIL EY) .....•.. SCHM IT ······ · ==== l)/J.IJ/78 JOINT BO /\RDS / (R IL EYl · ········ANTHONY····---- !R I LEY · • · • • • · • · GU\R~ • • • • • • ';:: -- PERRY • ········CU LV ER ·····---- ORTIZ · ········EVANS ·····.___::___ -- COOP ER ········F OX ········~ --COO PE R~······· ·GAMB INA · · · ._;L_ -- (HUTC H I SO N)···· ·G LO C KNER··.___:!__ -- (ROGET)········ ·GR A H A M ·····~ --. ,/ (MEYER).···•··· ·GR I FFIN ····---- (RA SHFORD) .. ·• ··HOLT·······_:L_ -- (W E LL S )········· HOUS TON···._../_ -- (LACA YO )········ HU DS OM· · · • ·~ -- !SEIT Z )•······· ·L AS 'ZLO· · · · ._::!._ -- RYCK OFF) ·······MC IN N I S ··-_::!_ __ \'I E I SHA U P T)_····· Ml LLER · · · · .__:!__ __ FINLAYSO N)····· OL SON ·····.___::__ __ EVAN S )········ ·O RTIZ······ -. (SHENK MA N)····· ·PATT I NSO N ·.-/--- ~ --(CULV ER )········ P ER RY ······--__ (NY BORG) · · · · · · • ·~· · · · ./ (ANTH Ol'1 Y) · · · · · • ·R I LEY· · · · • ·--:::=--- (CR ANK)········· R I MA ······ .--r--- (YOU NG ) · · • · · · • · ·R OG ET · · · · · .-v --- l HW'iM f.l-) •.•.•.•• RYC KOFF ·•.. v == WEL S H) ..•..•••. SALTARELLI . ./ RI LEY) .......•. SC HMIT· .... -i --- (ROTH) ......•... SEYMO U R ·~.·~ -- (1\IELSH) · · ·······S HAR P ····· .-v --- ~BAI LEY)······· ·SHENKMAN ··.~ -- \SHE N[<MAN ) ······SI EB E RT ···.---_;---. (HOYT)········· -S MITH·····.-..,,--- (ADL ER )········ ·ST ANT ON ··· .-v --- (RYCKOF F) ·······S TR AUSS···.-..,,-;-- (ADLER)········ -SVA L S T AD· · .-.,--- lZOMMIC K) .•..•.. SYLV I A···· .-Y--- GAID O ) ..• · .... ·VARDOU LIS· .-, --- WINT E RS ) ....... VELASQU EZ ·.-., --- (FRI ED ). ········WE DAA ······---- (RY CK OF F) ······-WILLI AM S ···-/--- (VELA SQ UEZ)···· .;;INTERS···-~ -- OTH ERS ---- HARPER ....• ~ SYLVESTER.·-"'- LEWIS ....•• ..L_ CLARKE ..•.. ~ BRO\'/N •••... ~ .. ,/ WO ODRUFF ... __ HOH E NE R .... ~ HOl'/A RD .... . HUNT ....••. ~ KEITH ...... _v _ KENNEY .•... LYNCH ..... . MADDOX ..... __ MARTI NS ON .. ....JL_ PI ERSA LL ..• STEVE NS ... . TRAVERS ... . JULY 12, 1978, JOINT MTG. a) Report of Joint Chairman (9-b) Saltarelli advised Directors that since the postcards went out to property owners, the staff had received 2700 telephone calls. He then called a meeting of the Executive Conunittee for August 2, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Perry and Nyborg to -attend as guests. Chairman Saltarelli referred to letter from City of Anaheim to Senator Cranston and read press release from Cranston's office. Said he hoped that Cranston would be helpful in our waiver process. Report of General Manager Mr. Harper mentioned items on supplemental agenda. Referred to item 18 re bid opening for Job No. PW-062. Are recommending that two items on bid be deleted involving concrete as we feel they were rather high compared to engineer's estimate. Are recommending c::hange Order be executed at the same time as contract is signed to reduce it by that amount. Requested that item ll(i) be removed to item 12 for discussion. (12) Re Consent Calendar item #ll(i) REL reported that at the time the agenda was written, they had found a loader ~ for $39,500 which appeared to be a good piece of equipment. After material was mailed to Directors, they had an opportunity to road test this piece of equipment and it prooved not to be too satisfactory. Were several things that had to be done to bring it up to standard. In conjunction with securing several pieces of equipment, have found two other pieces which will not exceed $50,000. Said Bill Clarke has looked at these and found them to be satisfactory. Are recommending the used grader be increased to $52,000 plus tax. The loader will be secured for $40,000 or less stipulated in the report. A new piece of equipment similar to this is about $212,000. Item was then moved,seconded and carried by voice vote. SCAG representative Director Louis Velasquez volunteered to serve as the Districts' representative on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. It was then moved and seconded to appoint him. Voice vote. Motion carried. LA/OMA presentation Cindy Geter reported that this was a regional sludge management program for Los Angeles and Orange County area. Sludge plan to be completed by 1980. Re ferred to new brochure in Directors folders and asked that they complete questionairre and mail to LA/OMA. Said they wanted our Directors to be one of the first to see the new brochure. Dedication for Pl-16 FAH reported that John Bryson and Paul Defalco have agreed to be here and make some brief remarks at the dedication ceremony at 6:30 on August 9. Following that will have a tour of facilities for those Directors who have not seen them. If there is no objection, will be a light dinner before the meeting. Asked if there was any objections. There were none. Report re ad valorem vs. flat rate special assessment TLW reported that as Directors probably knew, we have had all sorts of phone calls. The action of the Board at the last two meetings was to direct the staff to proceed as we have done the past 25-30 years to attempt to raise revenue through levy of assessment based on assessed valuation. We have geared up to do that and at the last meeting had the first reading of an ordinance and set public hearing for purpose of considering the adoption by Districts of a fixed flat rate fee for the use of the sewers (user charge -non-variable). Though the rate between Districts does vary, the per parcel rate will be identical. The reason for double-tracking is so we would not get caught short if County Counsel or County Auditor decides that they would not process our levy of assessments as they have done every year. Said he has been spending a lot of time at County Counsel's office. Have been doing a lot of research and have talked to local representatives at numerous Districts throughout the State. Said the Auditor has cooperated but is waiting for County ,..,Counsel's opinion today. As of 5 o'clock hadn't come down . Is going to present opinion to County Auditor on Friday. At this moment, the opinion is likely to ) say that while it is an assessment, in placing some of the amendments into the Revenue Taxation Code, it ties us into SB 90 which is the fundamental tax law for the State. So why it is an assessment for all other purposes under SB 154, is now considered a tax and there is no authority to levy, only for bonded indebtedness. Only other levy is that levied by Board of Supervisors. Said McCort and he have worked on this extensively. Is somewhat of a logical conclusion based on new statues. As far as allocation of tax, in Section 31 & 32 of the new legislation we will, therefore, qualify with any other special District for receiving our pro rata allocation for this coming year. We are already geared up for the user charge for 1979-80. Are · certain that we will have in our possession a definitive answer from County Counsel or County Auditor prior to public hearing next Wednesday as to whether it is an assessment or outside the purvue of Jarvis. Will redesign the ordinance with automatic dates to protect ourselves by getting the flat rate in. Saltarelli asked if the Board of Supervisors would be required to allocate our share of the funds to us or not? TLW said, of necessity, seems to me will have to be getting a tax allocation. Therefore, we would be getting a pro rata share of the $4.00. Riley stated that we shouldn't expect a whole lot because they also have to allocate to fire department, sheriff, etc. Allocations are going to be getting pretty thin. Saltarelli added that we should levy flat rate so if we get nothing, will be covered . Can reduce next year. TLW advised that there is no action before the Board right now. Anthony stated that there is nothing in the State guidelines indicating that this District has to get anything at all. Said flat rate has not bee received well at all . Is penalizing the little people. Don't think it is really fair. Think we are going to have a very serious problem next week and throughout the year. Asked the staff if they have any good ideas. FAH said that was true. Are many parcels that will increase. At between 13,000-15,000 A.V. is about a push with last year. The charge that we have now varies by District from $3.25 to $5.00 per month. Is very inexpensive situation for waste treatment. However, are other problems with someone who has been paying $18 for several years and all of a sudden it is $39. and for some parcels that are not being served. We are talking about some provision in the ordinance for a rebate for these. We have been wanting to talk to computer people to see if there is some way that they could get a different rate. Anthony mentioned the difference between an apartment or house having the same charge. FAH said can get listing on apartment houses County-wide?? We do have a Class II charge for those properties that use -2- more than 1 0,000 gallons so could charge them accordingly . We do co ll ect $2 milli on from the indus trial community. Anthony a dd e d that many people think this is an entirely n ew fee. Don't understand this i s a replacement. Riley agreed . Fox said h e h as received a bout 20 calls and agree d with Sup ervisors. In t a lking about the u ser fee concept, will buy that . What they want to know is how it is that an apartmen t house gets by with paying the same as they do . Don't have answers for that . Need to have some r eady answers for th ese people. Have to b ack up use r concept. Culver asked if this is a us e r charge based on 100 % funding of our operation and was answered, yes . Deducted $2.2 million and that i s as f a r as we can go, right? Answered, right. Saltarelli stat ed that the only way u ser could get a deduction is in l evying total charge les s al locati on from County. Can't count on anythin g from County. Asked Directors what do we want to do? Take a $7,000,000 loss or take it out of reserves or l evy a charge? Don't have enough time by August 10th . Roget asked if this would be just for one year and was answered, yes. Vardouli s suggested one possible way out for one year would be to assess what they had l ast year . Saltarelli said we couldn't do that with 408,000 different amounts. Vardou lis said to just u se assessor's tapes. Saltar e lli a dvised that IRWD is charging $8 .00+, South Laguna $9 .25. Ours is $4 .00+ Just about half a s much as everybody e l se is paying. Vardoulis sti ll thought we s hould levy flat f ee b ased on what was paid last year . FAH discussed pos s ibi lity of goin g in wi th 90% of what was on the current roll for l as t year. Don't know if we can do tha t. JWS said this is one of the items computer people are looking into. Also, there are a lot of new p arce l s that h ave d eve lop ed since l as t year 's t apes. Third propblem is to be able to ge t information from County Assessor 's fil es. Ryckof f suggested we cou ld maybe assess commercia l property more next year to make up for this year . Smith asked what LA or San Diego does? FAH answe r ed San Diego is on a user fee charge on the water bill. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts have one small District a nd are going to try a user fee in tha t District . All their other Districts will take their chances to see wh a t they ge t on their :iro :rat a s h are. Re p utting our charge on water bill, are some 80 water companies here within our Districts. FAH a dvised further that we have been h earing from n ews media. The Register r eported asked to pass this on to the Board. Looked over our files and wen t to County Auditor an d County Treasurer's office and took last year's budget inform ation an d concluded that we had an $85 million pot in County Treasurer's office a nd don't need to collect anything for 2 or 3 years. Asked JWS to compute what fee would b e wh en we run out of mon ey. We think we are running a good operation with long-range planning. If we can do it for $3 -4 per month, think it is pretty good. Saltarelli said a t press conference h ad The Register, LA Times, Daily Pilot, K\VIZ, Channel 2 news and Huntington Independent. They asked some very good questions and left them with impression that we were operat:ing well and p ri c e was we ll justified . Came out with positive feeling from that press conference but since that time, the mailing went out. -3- FAJ-1 said we are open to a ny s u ggest ions as to h ow to set this up. Will rent some chai r s and put out i n the parking lot. Sal tarelli suggested we could possibly buy some advertising space and explain card in more simpl e language . Culver asked if we h adn't asked for an extens ion of the August 10th da te to have our figures and facts together . Was told we asked f or extens i on t o Sept. 1 0th but haven't been advised yet. Anthony ask e d if the re were any other counties with a s imilar s ituat ion . TLW said Alameda Coun ty and Fl ood Control District are going ahead and t ryin g to l evy their assess ment outside the purvue of Jarvis. Said County Counsel h as apparently a dvi sed Flood Control that they can continue with spe ci a l assessmen t . Are lots of different opinions. Saltarelli added, in tal king about a l locations by Board of Super visors, thi s a ll ocation s h ou ld be fr om regular tax revenues and not surplus allocations. An thony said of the s h are that goes to special d istric ts, part goes to ?? TLW di sagreed . Said legi s lation has done more to add confusion. SB 154 and that wh ich cleaned up SB 154 have two fund chapters re tax appo rtionme nt and tax allocations. So c lose ly r e l a t e d. I s a great amount of confusion r e l ative to apportionm ent re surp lus . Allocation formu la really prett y simp l e. Directs County Auditor to take revenue a nd rates levied by a ll special districts . Nex t step is to take $4 and levy it out. The problem is t hey are vague in order to gi ve l ocal representatives elbow room and discretion. Do n't agree with that interpretation. Form ula is not wrong. JWS r eported that yesterday we received our first check in paymen t of the District 2 flat fee. Have made at l eas t one friend--one man had two parcel numbers and had been paying two tax bills for years. Griffin said we have a big bullet to bite. Think we owe it to ourselves and ot he r people to indi cate to them what our attitu te will be and what actions will b e tak e n this fo llow ing year . Think we s h ou l d leave this meeting sayi ng we are goin g to tak e act i on to develop a plan for user fees based on equity for sma ll guy a n d big user. Think that will estab lish the bas i s for what this District will be for year s to com e . Saltarelli said tha t i s · exactl y what our intention is . Can't e l imin ate i n equity the first year but are already planning on taking parcels that are not using system off. Saltarel li said we wo ul d know more on Wednesday night. Williams suggested that s ince many people think this is the first time charge , should make a transparency of last year 's t ax bill to point out that it has been there. Ant hon y adde d we s h ould prepar e some very simple graphics for next week. Sa ltarell i said we shou ld h ave a list of what various districts charge as opposed to wh at we charge. Shou ld put this in report . Wedaa said we should put some of these thoughts in a one-page handout for meeting . (23) DISTRICT 5 -Other business REL gave s t atu s report on siphon project. S~id we are working with consultant to prepare project re port fo r Board's considerat ion before EIR completed. Fee l that there was a n inadequacy with draft EIR and will look at severa l alternatives including one favorably approved by Coastal Commission . Al l a lternatives will be reviewed in EIR. Feel that this r eport shou ld be before Board for con sideration in September. -4- DISTRICT 11 -Ot her business FAH reported re Coast Hi ghw ay Trunk Sewer. Suggested we retain Brown, Hart, Ball and Baerwit z in Long Beach (Allen Tebb ett s , Attorney) for l egal advise re coastal issues for an amo unt not to exceed $2,000. It was so move d a nd seconded . Motion carried. (31) DISTRICT 2 -Annexation 35 -Bryant Ranch I David Col gan spoke on behalf of John Wertin Deve l opment Company . Said there was some urgency in this. Want to attach the fees to tho se 1508 acres and then have ·.installment paymen t s for 7 years subject to Bo ard approval. Said they would like to have fees deferred for open space until s u ch time as service is provided for this area. In working with City of Yorba Li nd a and beginning annexation proceedings, City advised they wou l d n otify Districts when development begins there. Wou ld like to c l ose annexation proceedings as soon as p ossible . TLW reported regarding this proposal. Developer has submitted a draft agree me nt . Are some considerable con ce rns . Re fee sche dule provided for urb a n area not p"iy able at this time , the Districts have never extende d paymen t sch edule to 7 year s , 3-5 at most. Question relative to fee for open space area. In the past we wil l defer them until open space becomes urban area. The fees then i n effect would app l y rather than the fees du e now. TLW sa id the agreements can be formulated rather quick ly . No thin g t erribly new or fore ign t o his office or the Dist r i cts. Sa ltarelli asked TLW if h e would prepare a report for Directors at n ext meeting . Tom said al l of our efforts h ave b een devoted to this tax problem recently . If there is an urgency, could b e put on July 19th agen da . As k ed how serious is time problem? Th ey said they wo ul d like to move as fast as possible . Are scheduled to exercise option agreement next mo nth. Want to have some assurance that they will have green light and wi ll be ab l e to get into the District . Sa l tarelli said he was not sure we could h ave agreemen t ready by next week . No t s ure what other in formation we need. FAH added t hat actuall y, informa tion to date is rath s ketchy compared to other an n exat ions . Are real l y looking at c~ 1Cfea that Board co uld declare their intent to approve a~reeme nt at s uch time the~Boar d i s ready to move. Mr. Harper added that as the Directors kn e w, we h ope to apply for wiaver of secondary treatment requirements. One of the statut ory items that we will have to address in t he waiver is that no substantial n ew t erritory can b e taken in outsid e th e District . Have been t alking to the ~ people in Washington trying to get a clarificati on on this. Coul d actua lly mean we can't ake i n a l a r ge new area. Wil1 n o t be ·cleared up un itl the first part ~st . Cou ld come b ack with r eport re payment of fees and interest rate and address how the open space s hould be tied up. Open space wil l pretty muc h be tied to local entity to be responsible . These are some of t h e issues . May have to ask for some sort of security on the fees . Smith said he th oug ht we certai nly needed a co mpl ete report . In line with Prop 13, if peop l e fo und ou t we did something l :il{? this, wouldn 't go over very good. Holt said h e would like to see that there is a n e nt ity holding the property . Don 't like 6%, awfu l cheap . Graham stated t h at would seem to be almost asking the impossible for the staff to h ave r eport, etc . by next week. Sa ltare lli added that staff and Coun se l are t otally invo l ved in revenue program . -5- David Colgan stated that it was his understanding that it would take a period of months to have final annexation of the property. Possibly November or December. Asked if it would be possible to start proceedings with LAFCO to get things rolling? Saltarelli answered that there was nothing to stop them from making application for annexation to City through LAFCO. TLW stated that conceptual approval from the Board is the first step that staff needs. Not unusual situ~tio~ but need deposit to start reports. Can't come back with report one week from tonight to satisfy Directors as to substance. Need motion~provill& conceptual idea of annexation fee program and to proceed with all due haste . It was so moved by Wedaa and he added could request a deposit of approximately $2,000 for necessary charges. Restated motion to approve idea in concept subject to difinitive agreement approved by property owners and District. Motion seconded . TLW added it wou ld . be most appropriate for FAH or he to direct letter to proponents re understanding which would include that District is not bound to fITia1ize this annexation if waiver provision contingent on no annexation. Federal requirements may require us to bail out. Was so moved and seconded to add tnat to motion . Holt said he failed to see what the big panic was to get going so fast. Are other things much more important at this time. Wedaa replied that they have an option on Bryant Ranch within next 30 days. Very substantial investment on their part. Holt said would be to the best option of property to give extension of time. Smith added he wanted a good understanding that we aremt conunitted if Federal 1 aw affects our waiver. Colgan said they are not asking to be annexed tomorrow. Would just like to get the Board to approve as to concept knowing a number of factors have to be considered. Want to get the show on the road. Saltarelli said he thought the motion would take care of that . Colgan said they have a check for $2,000 tonight that they would be glad to pay for report charges. Directors wanted to be sure we didn't go with 7 year agreement. Colgan said they selected 7-year figure prior to talking to staff. Realize now 5 years would be more appropriate. Perry thought they should direct staff to go to work on this but not take any money yet. Holt wondered if we have a working contract for annexation, may weaken our position re waiver. Could possibly happen. Reiterated motion to begin processing and have applicant pay for staff time with !lQ..S.Ommi.tment. for District to acc~pt annexation.. Voice vote on motion. Motion carried. -6-