Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-06-21 �wS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , TELEPHONES: $ � AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - 9 6 2-2 41101 P. O. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270B 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, 5AN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 15, 1978 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 2 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 1978 -- 7:30 P,P".. BREA CITY HALL 401 S . BREA BOULEVARD BREA, CALIFORNIA (SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE) Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of June 14, 1978, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above ;lour and date. The purpose of this ;neeting is for an informal public hearing or. the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. P .; ._. S etary JIVS:rb Q DATE ELM BREA CITY HALL 401 S. BREA BLUR. m� o � >. Ld Q) z 0 0 m SA I COUNTY = N TATlON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RN READE FRION 91 DIST. 2 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING IJCDNESDAY, DUNE 21 , 1978, 7:30 P.M. - +� r_ r AT BREA CITY HALL . NAM�� nYIY.M Ip BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 DISTRICT ®• 9540-62-24111 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING JUNE 21, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. (1) Roll call (2) Consideration of actions relative to informal hearing on- Draft Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: (a) Open hearing (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written • comments relative 'to the Draft Environmental .Impact Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders) (c) Consideration of oral comments, if any (d) General discussion and staff comments (e) Close hearing (3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting engineer to prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving amendment to agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final Environmental Impact.Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00 (5) Other business and communications, if any (6) Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Counter Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange Count Clifornia 10844 Ellis Avenue County, Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 DIS TRICT ®o . 2 9540- 62241- 1 62211 AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS POSTED.✓ ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING . COMP & MILEAGE..... . FILES SET UP,•,,,,V............ J UNE 21, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED.✓ LETTERS WRITTEN,,,1/,,,__ MINUTES WRITTEN...jl.� MINUTES FILED,,••, ,,,� (1) Roll call (la) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tem (2) Consideration of actionsrelative to informal hearing on Draft FILE Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: LETTER .............. A/c ....TKLR .... (a) Open hearing (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written ' comments relative to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders) (c) Consideration of oral comments, if any (d) General discussion and staff comments FILE ................_ LEnER KLR .. (C=F)re1 % -) Close hearing �/ n A/C . ~ V �Ir � A (3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting engineer to M1� prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving ameft&e„-t to MIS agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final Roll call vote or cast Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a FILE .�}e8ni�a p p Y Ballot per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00 e� (5) Other business and communications, if any (6) Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978 7%5S i hrii AGENDA ITEM #2 (b) ten comments received relative to Draft Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: Agency Dated City of Brea 7/07/77 State of California, State Water Resources 7/08/77 Control Board, Division of Water Quality State of California, State Water Resources 8/04/77 Control Board, Division of Water Quality City of Brea 10/14/77 City of God, Saint Joseph's Hill of Hope 1/09/78 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 1/09/78 County of Orange, Environmental Management 1/12/78 Agency, Advance Planning Division Don McBride Company 1/26/78 State of California, State Water Resources 1/30/78 Control Board, Division of Water Quality County of San Bernardino, Environmental 2/15/78 Improvement Agency Southern California Association of Governments 3/08/78 State of California, Department of Parks 4/20/78 and Recreation State of California, Department of Fish 4/27/78 and Game State of California, State Water Resources 4/27/78 Control Board, Division of Water Quality State of California, Department of 4/28/78 Transportation 6/21/78 ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYONFACILITIES P ACILITIE LAN * 7/14/76 (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of (Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 7/14/76 (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage (service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 7/14/76 (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility (Report and Environmental Impact Report *10/13/76 Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan *10/19/77 (Discussed alternative for Carbon .Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan ( *10/19/77 (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan ( *10/19/77 (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, (as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR C *10/19/77 (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing (on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed (facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future lv ✓ (meeting 10/26/77 Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties * 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 1/24/78 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date to February 28, 1978 * 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978 * 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978 * 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR L.' from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published in The Register *Board Actions I RESOLUTION NO. 78-123-2 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH EGOS MANAGEMENT CRITERIA RE PREPARATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH ECOS MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR PREPARATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 dated to that certain Agreement dated October 13, 1976, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and ECOS Management Criteria, authorizing preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said work will be on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute said Amendment No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held June 21, 1978. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA r.O.e0x 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE ar June 15, 1978 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 MANAGER'S REPORT o14fe62.2411 CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN AND DRAFT EIR The Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Regional Water Quality Control Board' s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa Ana River Basin. The area was placed by the RWQCB on the Grant Funded Project list and on August 11 , 1976 , Sanitation District No. 2 filed a grant application with the State and Environmental Protection Agency and entered into a joint agreement, as lead agency, with the City of Brea and Chino Basin Municipal Water District. The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental Impact Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives are discussed, with No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con- sultant. 1. Sewering to County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County system - $3 . 1 million 2. Construction of local treatment plants - $3. 4 million 3. Upgrade existing treatment and disposal systems - $1. 1 million 4. No project The R14QCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their operation are deficient in nature and generally recognized as a temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is solved in the study area. The consultant recommendation includes serving an area in the City of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino County. The District No. 2 adopted Master Plan at this point has no provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would require complete Board action to do such. Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important factors now make the most feasible Alternative No. 3. The factors are: v 1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the lower reaches of the project below Carbon Canyon Dam to serve the existing population and found it growth-inducing. 2. The SCAG Executive Committee rules that the upper portion of the project (San Bernardino County) was inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies . 3. The project funding eligibility based on E-0 popu- lation forecast was estimated to be 2500 people. Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about 10, 000 people . If State and Federal funding were received, there would be severe growth restrictions . It. is the staff' s recommendation at this time to conclude the public hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' EIR consultant finalize the EIR. (This will require an amendment to the contract because of the changed recommended alternative requires additional work) . The Facilities Plan and EIR will be submitted to the EPA and SWRCB for the District to receive full payment for the Step I work. To solve the problem at the local level , it is recommended that Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor to the Dam and amend the Master Plan to take over the pump station above the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system and build a 10" or 12" line to connect the ponds and take them out of. service. At present, Brea has connection from the ponds via a 4" line to the park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will have to be levied against the homeowners for sewer service, or a contract entered into with the City, or the area must annex (which would cost about $140 , 000) . Brea charges no special assessments or fees for operation of the ponds . The District can proceed and build its amended Master Plan facilities now. Before Brea builds its link from the Park to the ponds it must annex those areas that the ponds serve. Estimated costs to Brea for annexation and construction are about $400 , 000 . Brea will have to resolve this cost issue with itself and the homeowners . Fred A. Harper General Manager *./ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.OWX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE June 15 , 1978 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)54&2910 MANAGER'S REPORT (714)982 2411 CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN AND DRAFT EIR The Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Regional Water Quality Control Board' s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa Ana River Basin. The area was placed by the RWQCB on the Grant Funded Project list and on August 11, 1976 , Sanitation District No . 2 filed a grant application with the State and Environmental Protection Agency and entered into a joint agreement, as lead agency, with the City of Brea and Chino Basin Municipal Water District. The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental Impact Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives are discussed, with No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con- sultant. 1. Sewering to County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County system - $3 . 1 million 2. Construction of local treatment plants - $3 .4 million 3. Uppgrade existin treatment and disposal systems - $l. l million /cc./f; 4. No project The RWQCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their operation are deficient in nature and generally recognized as a temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is solved in the study area. The consultant recommendation includes serving an area in the City of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino County. The District No . 2 adopted Master Plan at this point has no provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would require complete Board action to do such. Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important factors now make the most feasible Alternative No. 3 . The factors are: �.e 1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the lower reaches of the project below Carbon Canyon Dam to serve the existing population and found it growth-inducing. 2. The SCAG Executive Committee rules that the upper portion of the project (San Bernardino County) was inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies . 3. The project funding eligibility based on E-0 popu- lation forecast was estimated to be 2500 people. Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about 10, 000 people. If State and Federal funding were received, there would be severe growth restrictions . It is the staff's recommendation at this time to conclude the public hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' EIR consultant finalize the EIR. (This will require an amendment to the contract because of the changed recommended alternative requires additional work) . The Facilities Plan and EIR will be submitted to the EPA and SWRCB for the District to receive full payment for the Step I work. To solve the problem at the local .level , it is recommended that Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon.Canyon Dam Interceptor to the Dam and amend the Master Plan to take over the pump station above the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system and build a 10" or 12" line to connect the ponds and take them out of service. At present, Brea has connection from the ponds via a 4" line to the park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will have to be levied against the homeowners for sewer service, or a contract entered into with the City, or the area must .annex (which would cost about $140,000) . Brea charges no special assessments or fees for operation of the ponds . The District can proceed and build its amended Master Plan facilities now. Before Brea builds its link from the Park to the ponds it must annex those areas that the ponds serve. Estimated costs to Brea for annexation and construction are about $400 , 000. Brea will have .to resolve this cost' issue with itself and the homeowners. Fred A. Harper General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLISAVENUE June 15 , 1978 / FOUNTAI VALLEY.CALIF0RNIA92708 4)54I}2910 MA AGER'S REPORT (71 22411 CARBON CAN N FACILITIE PLAN AND �' �� FT EIR CW The Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Regional Water Quality Control Board' s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa Ana River Bas ' ,,��•• !h� was placed on the Grant Funded Project lis �>Tdst 11, 19 6, S��rTyy�t�„aition District No . 2 filed a grant app icat a ta�eAandLn nvironmental Protection Agency and entered into a joint agreement ,as lead agency, with the City pf Brea and Chino Basin MunicipalcWateDis ript The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental Impact Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives are discussed, with No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con- sultant. 1. Sewering to County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County system - $3 . 1 million �J 0., 2. Construction f lgcal treatment plants - u$3 .4 f. million e.. 3. Upgrade existin treatment and disposal systems - $1. 1 million ,tiJ J p�}Q C 4. No project Q The R14QCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their operation are deficient in nature and generally recognized as a temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is solved in the study area. 1 The consultant recommendation includes serving an area in the City of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino County. The District No. 2 adopted Master Plan at this point has no provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would require vAmrpTErt- Board action to do such. Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important factors now make _'__—___�=11 Alternative No. 3Y The factors are: 4 Vt,0J� . 1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the lower reaches .of .the project below Carbon Canyon Dam to serve the existing population and fo-u;,ajit growth-inducing. GN., 2. The SCAG Executive Committee rule that the upper portion of the project (San Bernardino County) was inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies. 3. The project funding eligibility based on E-0 popu- lation forecast was estimated to be 2.,5 00 people. . Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about 10, 000 people. If State and Federal funding were received, there would be severe growth restrictions . It is the staff's. recommendation 'at .this time to conclude. the public hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' .-it consultant finalize the EIR. (Th�will require .an amendment to the contract because of—�t'� '_+�+ . recommended alternativei,YZ"q Tres additional work) . The Facilities Plan and EIR wi-_±'2 be submitted to the. EPA. and S14RCB for the .District to receive full p Ment for the Step I„work. To solve the problem at the local .level, it is recommended that Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon. Canyon Dam Interceptor to the Dam and amend the Master Plan to take over the pump station above ... the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system and build a *—lam+' line to connect the ponds and take them out of service. At present, Brea has#"connection . from the ponds via a liet line to the -park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will have to be levied against the homeowners for sewer service, or a contract entered into with the City, or the .area must .annex (which would cost . about $140, 000) . 0 I ti`- The Districk" can proceed an bui d its amende Master Plan facilities now. Before Brea builds its link from the eark to the ponds it must annex those areas that the ponds serve. Es imat&d cost] to Brea for., annexation and construction aft $400 , 000. te-� re9QI Aw—Wi-i-s QQ-t-' ' ss;_;_A iA_". =rse1 f rhp lk"A. Fred H er G ral Mana 6/21/78 ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN * 7/14/76 (Received $ filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of (Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 7/14/76 (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage (service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 7/14/76 (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility (Report and Environmental Impact Report *10/13/76 Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan *10/19/77 (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan f *10/19/77 (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan C *10/19/77 (Authorized staff to file Notice of intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, (as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR *10/19/77 (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing (on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed (facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future l✓ (meeting 10/26/77 Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties * 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 1/24/78 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date to February 28, 1978 * 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978 * 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978 * 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR 1*0d from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published in The Register *Board Actions RE: AGENDA ITEM #2 (b) Written comments received relative to Draft Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: �..j Agency Dated City of Brea 7/07/77 State of California, State Water Resources 7/08/77 Control Board, Division of Water Quality State of California, State Water Resources 8/04/77 Control Board, Division of Water Quality City of Brea 10/14/77 City of God, Saint Joseph's Hill of Hope 1/09/78 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 1/09/78 County of Orange, Environmental Management 1/12/78 Agency, Advance Planning Division Don McBride Company 1/26/78 State of California, State Water Resources 1/30/78 Control Board, Division of Water Quality County of San Bernardino, Environmental 2/15/78 Improvement Agency Southern California Association of Governments 3/08/78 State of California, Department of Parks 4/20/78 and Recreation State of California, Department of Fish 4/27/78 and Game State of California, State Water Resources 4/27/78 Control Board, Division of Water Quality State of California, Department -of 4/28/78 Transportation - 6/21/78 ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN * 7/14/76 (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of (Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 7/14/76 (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage (service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area C * 7/14/76 (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility (Report and Environmental Impact Report *10/13/76 Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area * 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan *10/19/77 (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan C *10/19/77 (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan C *10/19/77 (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, (as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR C *10/19/77 (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing (on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed (facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future (meeting 10/26/77 Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties * 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 1/24/78 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date to February 28, 1978 * 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978 * 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978 * 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published in The Register *Board Actions PHONES: (714) 540.2910 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER 962-2411 �0 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND SECRETARY TO THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O.BOX 8127-10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORMA 92708 1/24/78 Advised persons on mailing list of extension of comment date from from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 (Never did advise re extension of comment date from February 28 to March 30.) In letter to State Clearing House on 5/8/78, advised of time extension to June 9, 1978. Referred to original comment date of January 16, 1978, only. 6/15/78 BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN 7/14/76 Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District & City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area t 7/14/76 Approved participation in Step l Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area 7/14/76 Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility Report and EIR 10/13/76 Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan 10/19/77 Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan 10/19/77 Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan 10/19/77 Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must be received on EIR 10/19/77 Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future meeting 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved 112 (-I on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978. 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978. 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea `<I z y City Hall 5 f� 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 10/26/77 Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978 5/15/78 Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register 6/15/78 BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN 7/14/76 Received $ filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District & City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area 7/14/76 Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area 7/14/76 Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility Report and EIR 10/13/76 Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan 10/19/77 Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan 10/19/77 Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan 10/19/77 Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must be received on EIR 10/19/77 Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future meeting 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978. 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978. 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 10/26/77 Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978 5/15/78 Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register JUNE 14;' 19.78 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT ON THE MEETING OF THE WEST COAST DISCHARGERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SEATTLE JUNE 7TH, ALSO, YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON THE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS FOLDERS UNDER THIS ITEM RE SENATOR CRANSTON . ANNOUNCE THAT NO MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS BEING PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE , EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �.0 An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 , of Orange County, California, was held on June 21 , 1978 , at Brea City Hall, 401 S. Brea Boulevard, Brea, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. . The roll was called and a quorum of the Board was reported present. Directors present: Directors Henry Wedaa, Chairman, Donald Holt, Sam Cooper, Beth Graham, Bernard Houston, Vern Evans, David Ortiz, Bob Perry, Roger Stanton and Louis Velasquez Directors absent: Directors Ralph Clark, John Seymour and Don Smith Present: Fred A, -Harper, Secretary pro tem Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , June 21, 1978. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.2 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, on the 21st day of June , 1978 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my nd and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 2 th' 21sY day of June 1978 . Se r a , o d of Directors of C u ty/ anit ion District No. 2 5-110 MEETING DATE June 21, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 2 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS CA NK)• - . . . t . .RIMA. . . . . . . . RILEY . .. . WELSH). . . . . . . .SHARP. . . . . . . ANTHONY RILEY - • • • • • • • •CLARK• • ••• - �..,►� R I LEY .. .. . . . .ANTHONY. . . . ._ PERRY • •• • •-r• • •CULVER• • • • • .--. ORTIZ . . . . . . ..EVANS. . . . . . . ORTIZ . . . . . . .. -EVANS• • -• • • ` DISTRICT 2 COOPER • • • • • • • •FOX• • • • • -•• • COOPER - • •• • •••GAMBINA• ••- FRIED) . . . . . . . .WEDAA. . .. .. .. _._._ HUTCHISON)• • • • .GLOCKNER•- - RASHFORD). . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . ._y� ROGET • • -•• • -• •GRAHAM• • •• . RILEY) • . • •• •••CLARK. . . .. ..a, Q- MEYER)• • • • • • • • •GRIFFIN• • • -- COOPER) •- .. . . .{;)• . . . . . . . . ✓- y �RASHFORD). . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . ROGET . ... . . . ..GRAHAM. . . . . . ✓ WELLS)• • • • •- • •• 0 - - --_ �_ H USTON WELLS . . . . . . . .HOUSTON• . . . . +� . _ L•ACAYQp). . . . . . .•HUDSON• • • • • EVANS) - • • - • • • .ORTIZ- - - - - - ---C�L._.. SEITZ)t • • • • - - - •LAS7_LO. . . . . CULV R)- -; • • - -PERRY• • • • • • • ✓ RYCKOFF). . . . .. .MC INNIS- • • ROTH SEYMOUR WEISHAUPT?• • • •-MILLER• • • •- • • • � � • • • � � - - � •� �`— FINLAYSON • • • • -OLSON• • ••• - HOYT . . . . . . • . -SMITH• • • • • • • ---- ADLER) . . . .. . ..STANTON• • • ••_LI-1, EVANS). .. . . . . . .ORTIZ• • • • • • WINTERS) . . . . ..VELASQUEZ• • •_ SHENKMAN) •• • • • •PATTINSON•- CULVER • • • • • • • •PERRY• • •• •- DISTRICT 3 NYBORG -. • • • • • .PRIEST• • - • - ANTHO��VVY)• •• • • • •RILEY• • • • • - ADLER . - •• - ...SVALSTAD• • • . CRANKI- -• • • • • • -RIMA• - - ••- - MEYER)- -• • • • ••GRIFFIN• • •- • YOUNG). . . o . . . . .ROGET• • • • • - PERRY) • • • - . . ..CULVER. . .. . . HUMM ) L -•• • -- • •RYCKOFF•- •- COOPER) • - • • • • •GAMBINA• • • . • WELSH . . . . . o • . .SALTARELLI• LACAYQ)• • • • • • •HUDSON• • • - • • RILEY • • • • . - . . -SCHMIT• - • • - SEITZ) . . .• • . . .LASZLO- • - • • - ROTH)- .. . . . . . . .SEIYMOUR•= • • WEISHAUPT • • • •MILLER• • .• • . WELSH)• -• •• • • • •SHARP• • • - • • FINLAYSON - • • •OLSON. . . . . . . BAILEY)- • • • • • • •SHENKMAN• • - EVANS) - - . . . . . .ORTIZ- • • • . . . SHEN MAN) • • • • • •SIEBERT• - • • NYBORG) . : . . . . .PRIEST• • • • . . HOYT • • •• • • • • • •SMITH. . . . . • YOUNG . . . ... . .ROGET. • - - •. . ADLER) STANTON RILEY . . . . . . . .SCHMIT. . . . .. RYCKO F)• • • • • • •STRAUSS- • . . ROTH)... ADLER• • -• • • • • •SVALSTAD• • - SHENKMA );- . . . .S I EBERT. . . . . ZOMMI K)• • •• • •• . . . .. SYLVIA ZOMMICK . . . . ..SYLVIA. . . . . . GAIDO). . . . . •• • •VARDOULIS• • VELASQUEZ) . . . .WINTERS. . . . . IWINTE�S). • • • • . •VELASQUEZ• - (FRIED • •• • • • • ••WEDAA• - •- - • DISTRICT 5 �VELASQUEZ) - o RYCKOFF-)• • • • • • •WILLIAMS• •HUMMEL . . • • - • •RYCKOFF• . . . • • •WI NTERS- • • • ANTHONY� . . . . . •RILEY• • • • • • • RYCKOFF • - • • • •STRAUSS• • • • • OTHERS DISTRICT 6 HARPER. . . . . (RYCKOFF) ... .. .MC INNIS. . . . -SYLVESTER-. CRANK . . . .. . ..RIMA. . . . . . .. LEWIS. . . . .. RILEY) . . .. - - . •ANTHONY- • • • - CLARKE. . . .. BROWN. . . ..._ DISTRICT 7 GAIDO . . - - • • • -VARDOULIS• • - HOYT) • • • • • • - • •SMITH• • • • • • • WOODRUFF.-.. RILEY . . . . . . ••CLARK• . • • • • • HOW RD. . . .. . . . . ORTIZ� H . . ... • • •EVANS. . . . . o• . . . (HUTCHISON)• • • •GLOCKNER• • • . HUUNTNT. . .. . .. WELSH) •• - - • • • •SALTARELLI • • KEINE Y. . . . .. . . .. KEN RYCKOFF)• • • • • •WILLIAMS- • • • LYNCH. . . . . . DISTRICT 11 MADDOX. . . . . MARTINSON.- BAILEY . . . . . . .vSHENKMAN. . - - PIERSALL.'. . rds✓ SHENKMAN) . . . ..PATTINSON. . . STEVENS. . .. RILEY) • • -• - •••SCHMIT• • - • • • TRAVERS. -.. 6/14/73 DISTRICT NO. 2 - Adjourned Regular Meeting June 21, 1978 7 : 30 p.m. Brea City Hall RE: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN) Wedaa: Please come to order. Gentlemen, before we can begin, we need to appoint a Secretary pro tem. Could I have a motion to appoint Mr. Fred Harper to that commission. Motion moved and seconded. Are there any objections? Hearing none -- so ordered. Could we then have a roll call by Fred. Harper: Wedaa, Wedaa: Here Harper: Holt Ho' . Here Harper: Clark Harper: Riley Harper: Fox Cooper: Cooper sitting in for Fox Harper: *Graham Harper: Roget Harper: Houston Houston: Here Harper: Ortiz Ortiz : Here Harper: Evans Evans: Here Ha 'er *Perry Harper Culver Harper: Seymour Ha. �r: Roth Harper: Smith Harper: Hoyt Harper: *Stanton Harper: Adler Harper: Velasquez Velasquez : Here *ARRIVED LATER - SEE FINAL ROLL CALL SHEET Harper: We have a quorum, Mr. Chairman Wedaa: Thank you, Mr. Harper. The purpose of tonight's meeting is for District No. 2 to conduct 0. Sr'-In hearing on the Draft Environ- *M01mental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. The Hearing is now open. Mr. Reid would you like to update the members of the Board and the audience relative to the current status of the EIR and tell us something about the written comments that were received. Reid: Mr. Chairman, this project has been with us since July of 1976 and has underwent a lot of changes. I've attempted to summarize them in the Manager' s Report. Because of , let' s say, the population projections made by the Department of Finance based on SCAG 76, they came up with a projection of 2 ,500 people. The facilities plan estimated about a 10,000 population so the funding levels of the project were in severe doubt. In addition, SCAG, the Executive Committee came out and they adopted the portion of the project from the L. A. County -- excuse me -- in the Orange County area they agreed with our philosophy of sewaging the area and taking the ponds out of the area but in the San Bernadino County, they objected to it and they didn't go along with SCAG' s region-wide growth policy and they would like to see alternative forms of treatment up there -- either reclamation or say upgrading some of ..r the existing systems up there. At the present time, in the Facilities Plan, the consultant recommended the alternative I, which was sewering the whole area to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Chino Basin Water District has expressed to us that the cost of sewering to Orange County far outweighs the local alternative of local treatment and because of the other contraints mentioned, we feel that at this time in the Districts best interest, and also the City of Brea' s interest to o with Alternative III, which would be to -- a modificatinn of Altprnative III -- which would be to sewer the Brea portion of the project and take the po onstruct the Carbon Canyon dam interceptor up to the dam, amend the District 2 Master Plan to take over the pump sta on an eave it for Brea and the land owners or property owners in the area o work out some kind of feasibility or assess- ------------ ment district or a way to fund the local sewers up there. In talking to the Chino Basin people, they have indicated that the County is a ready proceeding to set up a sewer maintenance district up there and upgrade some of the existing systems so it seems that at all levels t e project seems to De proceeding -- let's sav with the local solution If we go the local route, it no longer becomes a region-wide issue and SCAG or the State or EPA no longer become involved; but this is without the support of EPA State Funds. The comments that we received so far have been extensive and they pretty much favor or have suggested what is the District' s staff' s recommendation at this point. Wedaa: That is No. 3 Reid: Yes, that is No. 3 with certain modifications At this time after receiving the public testimony, it would be our recommendation and the EIR recommends the local alternative and complete the EIR and submit to the State and EPA for approval and receive our Sty I monies. That concludes my report. Wedda: Thank you Dennis. All right, do any members of the Board have any questions of staff before we take public testimony. Mr. Cooper. Conner: I 'm just filling in at this time -- when you say to be worked out - between the owners and Brea, could you elaborate a little more on that. Reid: Okay, at the present time, Brea , in a letter sent to us on June 14, 1977, notified us that they have a 10! overflow line from the 2 - Brea ponds to the park system that' s connected to the District 2 system. At this point in time, it is a technical violation -- let' s say a local sewer would have to go in to take the pond out of service; but before that could happen the area would have to annex, or a monthly user charge would have to be levied. Cooper: Now, that would be attributed to who now? The new people, the old people or the new and old? Reid: It would be attributed to those who are connected to the system. Since it' s a Brea line that was .connected,-1,belieye_that__it would be the responsibility of Brea. Cooper: What I'm trying to find out is that if we have 500 homes up in plus a mobile home park and you want to work the sewer in and the people who want to build in that area, who is ultimately responsible to pay for the cost of putting that in -- the new people the old people. . . . . . Wedaa: Mr. Harper , would you respond? H- -)er: Mr. Chairman, it would be the property owners in the area because they must annex to the Sanitation District. Cooper: Okay, then that would be outside -- you say annex. . . Harper: Well, it' s all -- nothing behind the dam is in District 2. Cooper: No, but what I'm trying to determine , in order to put this sewer line in -- let' s clarify this because there' s lots of people here who own some of the propery -- if the sewer line is put in, who ultimately has to pay for that sewer line -- the new people coming in or the old people _or the combination of? Harper: I would say the combination of because they will all benefit from it. Cooper: Okay, thanks, that' s what I wanted to determine. Wedaa: Now, are there any further questions of staff by any members of the Board? All right, let' s move on to the next phase of this hearing which is the consideration of any public hearings -- or oral comments by members of the public who might like to speak on the subject. Is there any member of dience that would like to say something r.s on this subject? Would you come forward please and identify yourself for the record, with your name and address. - 3 - White: My name is Ron White, 4061 Germander, Irvine, California and our company Heritage Development has title to a substantial land in the Carbon Canyon Area and we are interested in, I believe, the `'O solution mentioned on the last page of this brochure here to solve the problem at the local level , next to the last paragraph. And I'm not sure if I understand what Dennis ment by the Alternate III as being recommended. Wedaa: Is there a specific problem, or would like us to explain it all over again or we' ll do either one? White: I don't want to take up a lot of time but Alternate III is upgrading the existing treatment and disposal system -- what does that mean? Reid: Let me clarify, it involves some modification but it involves exactly what was stated here on the back -- sewering the portion in Orange County and leaving the area upstream in the County alone to either consider reclamation or status quo. The recommendation number III, Alternative III, is--actually it' s the recommendation to funded by local monies. As far as this project being sent to the State we would not receive any funding so it may go to the State in the form of no project. Do you understand that? *AW White: Yes, we are interested in seeing a sewer assessment District formed from this local level approach. Okay! Thank you . Wedaa: Thank you. Are there further comments from the audience on this subject? Keith: Milo Keith, Keith & Associates in Santa Ana. I represent the City of Brea as a city engineer tonight. We have followed this problem of the Carbon Canyon area with the staff of the District and we are representative on the Sanitation District' s staff and if the Directors need any clarification on the planning of the city for this area, I would be glad to answer them. Wedaa: All right, since we apparently have no further comments at the moment from any members of the audience, do any members of the Board have any questions to the city engineer concerning this issue? Okay, before I close the public hearing, is there anyone else who would like to speak on the matter? The Hearing is closed. All right let' s move on to item 3, which is consideration the motion directing os staff and consulting engineer to prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. Could I have a motion? I have a motion and seconded. /Are there any objections to the motion? - 7 - Harper: Mr. Chairman, there is one item which I would like to include in the proceedings and that is to receive and file a listing of the actions to date relative to the Environmental Impact Report for the Carbon Canyon Faclities Plan. It has to do with actions that the Board has taken since July 14 , 1976. It' s just a listing of the actions. Wedaa: Okay, could I have a motion to put it on the agenda as say 2F? Is that satisfactory? Harper: Yes Wedaa: All right a motion and seconded. Any objections to adding that item to the agenda? Could I have a motion to accept it? Motion and seconded. Any objections to acceptance? Appearing none, motion carried unanimously. Moving on to item number 3, the Final EIR could I have a motion . . . . . sorry. . . .Are there any objections to the motion on item number 3. Hearing none the motion passes unanimously. Let' s move to item number 4 -- let' s have a motion considering resolution No. 78-123-2. A motion and seconded. Could I have -- let' s have a roll call vote, Mr. Harper. Harper: Yes, Mr. Chairman. Wedaa We(' a: Yes Harper: Holt Holt: Yes Harper: Clark, Riley, Cooper Cooper: Yes Harper: Graham Graham: Yes Harper: Houston Houston: Yest Harper: Ortiz Ortiz Yes Harper: Evans Evans Yes Harper: Perry Perry: Yes Harper: Seymour, Roth, Smith, Hoyt, Stanton, Adler, Velasquez Velasquez : Yes We a: : All right, the motion passes unanimously. Item No. 5, Mr. Harper lv. is there any other business or communication? Harper: We have none, Mr. Chairman Wedaa: Members of the Board, are there any other xtx=x]DFx$xr-ztx7&xx business items or communications for the Board to consider tonight? Hearing S - none, let' s move to item 6 -- motion to adjourn i seconded, • any objections? The meeting is adjourned. l ,5 G 6�w -6 -