HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-06-21 �wS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , TELEPHONES:
$ � AREA CODE 714
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - 9 6 2-2 41101
P. O. BOX B127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270B
1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, 5AN DIEGO FREEWAY)
June 15, 1978
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 2
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 1978 -- 7:30 P,P"..
BREA CITY HALL
401 S . BREA BOULEVARD
BREA, CALIFORNIA
(SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE)
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of June 14, 1978, the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,
will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above ;lour and date. The
purpose of this ;neeting is for an informal public hearing or. the Draft
Environmental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan.
P .; ._.
S etary
JIVS:rb
Q
DATE
ELM
BREA CITY HALL
401 S. BREA BLUR.
m�
o � >.
Ld
Q)
z
0
0
m
SA I COUNTY
= N TATlON DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
RN READE FRION 91 DIST. 2 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
IJCDNESDAY, DUNE 21 , 1978, 7:30 P.M. -
+� r_
r AT BREA CITY HALL
. NAM�� nYIY.M Ip
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
DISTRICT ®• 9540-62-24111
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 21, 1978 - 7:30 P.M.
(1) Roll call
(2) Consideration of actions relative to informal hearing on- Draft
Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
(a) Open hearing
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written
• comments relative 'to the Draft Environmental .Impact
Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders)
(c) Consideration of oral comments, if any
(d) General discussion and staff comments
(e) Close hearing
(3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting engineer to
prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving amendment to
agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final
Environmental Impact.Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a
per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00
(5) Other business and communications, if any
(6) Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Counter Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange Count Clifornia 10844 Ellis Avenue
County, Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
DIS TRICT ®o . 2 9540-
62241- 1
62211
AGENDA
ADJOURNMENTS POSTED.✓
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING . COMP & MILEAGE..... .
FILES SET UP,•,,,,V............
J UNE 21, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED.✓
LETTERS WRITTEN,,,1/,,,__
MINUTES WRITTEN...jl.�
MINUTES FILED,,••, ,,,�
(1) Roll call
(la) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tem
(2) Consideration of actionsrelative to informal hearing on Draft
FILE Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
LETTER ..............
A/c ....TKLR ....
(a) Open hearing
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written
' comments relative to the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders)
(c) Consideration of oral comments, if any
(d) General discussion and staff comments
FILE ................_
LEnER KLR .. (C=F)re1 % -) Close hearing �/ n
A/C . ~ V �Ir � A
(3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting engineer to
M1� prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving ameft&e„-t to
MIS agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final
Roll call vote or cast Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a
FILE .�}e8ni�a p p Y Ballot
per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00
e� (5) Other business and communications, if any
(6) Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978 7%5S
i
hrii
AGENDA ITEM #2 (b)
ten comments received relative to Draft Environmental Impact
Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
Agency Dated
City of Brea 7/07/77
State of California, State Water Resources 7/08/77
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
State of California, State Water Resources 8/04/77
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
City of Brea 10/14/77
City of God, Saint Joseph's Hill of Hope 1/09/78
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 1/09/78
County of Orange, Environmental Management 1/12/78
Agency, Advance Planning Division
Don McBride Company 1/26/78
State of California, State Water Resources 1/30/78
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
County of San Bernardino, Environmental 2/15/78
Improvement Agency
Southern California Association of Governments 3/08/78
State of California, Department of Parks 4/20/78
and Recreation
State of California, Department of Fish 4/27/78
and Game
State of California, State Water Resources 4/27/78
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
State of California, Department of 4/28/78
Transportation
6/21/78
ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYONFACILITIES P ACILITIE LAN
* 7/14/76 (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of
(Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
* 7/14/76 (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage
(service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
* 7/14/76 (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility
(Report and Environmental Impact Report
*10/13/76 Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement
Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
* 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting
on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan
*10/19/77 (Discussed alternative for Carbon .Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
(
*10/19/77 (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
(
*10/19/77 (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978,
(as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
C
*10/19/77 (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing
(on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed
(facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future
lv ✓ (meeting
10/26/77 Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties
* 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978
1/24/78 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date
to February 28, 1978
* 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978
* 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and
interested parties
5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate
agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments
on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978
* 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
L.' from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published
in The Register
*Board Actions
I
RESOLUTION NO. 78-123-2
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH
EGOS MANAGEMENT CRITERIA RE PREPARATION OF
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON CARBON
CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO AGREEMENT WITH ECOS MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR
PREPARATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT ON THE CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 dated to that certain
Agreement dated October 13, 1976, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County and ECOS Management Criteria, authorizing preparation of the
Final Environmental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said work will be on a per diem fee basis
for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized to execute said Amendment No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held June 21, 1978.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA
r.O.e0x 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
ar June 15, 1978 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708
(714)540-2910
MANAGER'S REPORT o14fe62.2411
CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
AND DRAFT EIR
The Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Regional
Water Quality Control Board' s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that
was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems
and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa Ana River
Basin. The area was placed by the RWQCB on the Grant Funded Project
list and on August 11 , 1976 , Sanitation District No. 2 filed a grant
application with the State and Environmental Protection Agency and
entered into a joint agreement, as lead agency, with the City of
Brea and Chino Basin Municipal Water District.
The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage
service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental Impact
Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives are discussed, with
No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con-
sultant.
1. Sewering to County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County system - $3 . 1 million
2. Construction of local treatment plants - $3. 4
million
3. Upgrade existing treatment and disposal systems -
$1. 1 million
4. No project
The R14QCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their
operation are deficient in nature and generally recognized as a
temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is
solved in the study area.
The consultant recommendation includes serving an area in the City
of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino
County. The District No. 2 adopted Master Plan at this point has no
provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would
require complete Board action to do such.
Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important
factors now make the most feasible Alternative No. 3. The factors are:
v
1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the
lower reaches of the project below Carbon Canyon
Dam to serve the existing population and found it
growth-inducing.
2. The SCAG Executive Committee rules that the upper
portion of the project (San Bernardino County) was
inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies .
3. The project funding eligibility based on E-0 popu-
lation forecast was estimated to be 2500 people.
Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about
10, 000 people . If State and Federal funding were
received, there would be severe growth restrictions .
It. is the staff' s recommendation at this time to conclude the public
hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' EIR consultant
finalize the EIR. (This will require an amendment to the contract
because of the changed recommended alternative requires additional
work) . The Facilities Plan and EIR will be submitted to the EPA and
SWRCB for the District to receive full payment for the Step I work.
To solve the problem at the local level , it is recommended that
Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor to
the Dam and amend the Master Plan to take over the pump station above
the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system
and build a 10" or 12" line to connect the ponds and take them out of.
service. At present, Brea has connection from the ponds via a 4" line
to the park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will have to
be levied against the homeowners for sewer service, or a contract
entered into with the City, or the area must annex (which would cost
about $140 , 000) . Brea charges no special assessments or fees for
operation of the ponds .
The District can proceed and build its amended Master Plan facilities
now. Before Brea builds its link from the Park to the ponds it must
annex those areas that the ponds serve. Estimated costs to Brea for
annexation and construction are about $400 , 000 . Brea will have to
resolve this cost issue with itself and the homeowners .
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
*./
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
P.OWX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
June 15 , 1978 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708
(714)54&2910
MANAGER'S REPORT (714)982 2411
CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
AND DRAFT EIR
The Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Regional
Water Quality Control Board' s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that
was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems
and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa Ana River
Basin. The area was placed by the RWQCB on the Grant Funded Project
list and on August 11, 1976 , Sanitation District No . 2 filed a grant
application with the State and Environmental Protection Agency and
entered into a joint agreement, as lead agency, with the City of
Brea and Chino Basin Municipal Water District.
The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage
service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental Impact
Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives are discussed, with
No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con-
sultant.
1. Sewering to County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County system - $3 . 1 million
2. Construction of local treatment plants - $3 .4
million
3. Uppgrade existin treatment and disposal systems -
$l. l million /cc./f;
4. No project
The RWQCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their
operation are deficient in nature and generally recognized as a
temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is
solved in the study area.
The consultant recommendation includes serving an area in the City
of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino
County. The District No . 2 adopted Master Plan at this point has no
provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would
require complete Board action to do such.
Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important
factors now make the most feasible Alternative No. 3 . The factors are:
�.e
1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the
lower reaches of the project below Carbon Canyon
Dam to serve the existing population and found it
growth-inducing.
2. The SCAG Executive Committee rules that the upper
portion of the project (San Bernardino County) was
inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies .
3. The project funding eligibility based on E-0 popu-
lation forecast was estimated to be 2500 people.
Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about
10, 000 people. If State and Federal funding were
received, there would be severe growth restrictions .
It is the staff's recommendation at this time to conclude the public
hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' EIR consultant
finalize the EIR. (This will require an amendment to the contract
because of the changed recommended alternative requires additional
work) . The Facilities Plan and EIR will be submitted to the EPA and
SWRCB for the District to receive full payment for the Step I work.
To solve the problem at the local .level , it is recommended that
Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon.Canyon Dam Interceptor to
the Dam and amend the Master Plan to take over the pump station above
the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system
and build a 10" or 12" line to connect the ponds and take them out of
service. At present, Brea has connection from the ponds via a 4" line
to the park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will have to
be levied against the homeowners for sewer service, or a contract
entered into with the City, or the area must .annex (which would cost
about $140,000) . Brea charges no special assessments or fees for
operation of the ponds .
The District can proceed and build its amended Master Plan facilities
now. Before Brea builds its link from the Park to the ponds it must
annex those areas that the ponds serve. Estimated costs to Brea for
annexation and construction are about $400 , 000. Brea will have .to
resolve this cost' issue with itself and the homeowners.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127
10844 ELLISAVENUE
June 15 , 1978 / FOUNTAI VALLEY.CALIF0RNIA92708
4)54I}2910
MA AGER'S REPORT (71 22411
CARBON CAN N FACILITIE PLAN
AND
�' �� FT EIR
CW
The Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Regional
Water Quality Control Board' s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that
was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems
and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa Ana River
Bas ' ,,��•• !h� was placed on the Grant Funded Project
lis �>Tdst 11, 19 6, S��rTyy�t�„aition District No . 2 filed a grant
app icat a ta�eAandLn nvironmental Protection Agency and
entered into a joint agreement ,as lead agency, with the City pf
Brea and Chino Basin MunicipalcWateDis ript
The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage
service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental Impact
Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives are discussed, with
No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con-
sultant.
1. Sewering to County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County system - $3 . 1 million �J 0.,
2. Construction f lgcal treatment plants - u$3 .4
f.
million e..
3. Upgrade existin treatment and disposal systems -
$1. 1 million ,tiJ J p�}Q C
4. No project Q
The R14QCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their
operation are deficient in nature and generally recognized as a
temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is
solved in the study area.
1
The consultant recommendation includes serving an area in the City
of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino
County. The District No. 2 adopted Master Plan at this point has no
provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would
require vAmrpTErt- Board action to do such.
Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important
factors now make _'__—___�=11 Alternative No. 3Y The factors are:
4 Vt,0J� .
1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the
lower reaches .of .the project below Carbon Canyon
Dam to serve the existing population and fo-u;,ajit
growth-inducing. GN.,
2. The SCAG Executive Committee rule that the upper
portion of the project (San Bernardino County) was
inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies.
3. The project funding eligibility based on E-0 popu-
lation forecast was estimated to be 2.,5 00 people. .
Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about
10, 000 people. If State and Federal funding were
received, there would be severe growth restrictions .
It is the staff's. recommendation 'at .this time to conclude. the public
hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' .-it consultant
finalize the EIR. (Th�will require .an amendment to the contract
because of—�t'� '_+�+ . recommended alternativei,YZ"q Tres additional
work) . The Facilities Plan and EIR wi-_±'2 be submitted to the. EPA. and
S14RCB for the .District to receive full p Ment for the Step I„work.
To solve the problem at the local .level, it is recommended that
Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon. Canyon Dam Interceptor to
the Dam and amend the Master Plan to take over the pump station above
... the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system
and build a *—lam+' line to connect the ponds and take them out of
service. At present, Brea has#"connection . from the ponds via a liet line
to the -park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will have to
be levied against the homeowners for sewer service, or a contract
entered into with the City, or the .area must .annex (which would cost .
about $140, 000) .
0 I ti`-
The Districk" can proceed an bui d its amende Master Plan facilities
now. Before Brea builds its link from the eark to the ponds it must
annex those areas that the ponds serve. Es imat&d cost] to Brea for.,
annexation and construction aft $400 , 000. te-�
re9QI Aw—Wi-i-s QQ-t-' ' ss;_;_A iA_". =rse1 f rhp lk"A.
Fred H er
G ral Mana
6/21/78
ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
* 7/14/76 (Received $ filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of
(Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
* 7/14/76 (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage
(service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
* 7/14/76 (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility
(Report and Environmental Impact Report
*10/13/76 Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement
Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
* 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting
on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan
*10/19/77 (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
f
*10/19/77 (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
C
*10/19/77 (Authorized staff to file Notice of intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978,
(as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
*10/19/77 (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing
(on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed
(facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future
l✓ (meeting
10/26/77 Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties
* 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978
1/24/78 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date
to February 28, 1978
* 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978
* 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and
interested parties
5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate
agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments
on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978
* 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
1*0d from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published
in The Register
*Board Actions
RE: AGENDA ITEM #2 (b)
Written comments received relative to Draft Environmental Impact
Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
�..j
Agency Dated
City of Brea 7/07/77
State of California, State Water Resources 7/08/77
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
State of California, State Water Resources 8/04/77
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
City of Brea 10/14/77
City of God, Saint Joseph's Hill of Hope 1/09/78
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 1/09/78
County of Orange, Environmental Management 1/12/78
Agency, Advance Planning Division
Don McBride Company 1/26/78
State of California, State Water Resources 1/30/78
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
County of San Bernardino, Environmental 2/15/78
Improvement Agency
Southern California Association of Governments 3/08/78
State of California, Department of Parks 4/20/78
and Recreation
State of California, Department of Fish 4/27/78
and Game
State of California, State Water Resources 4/27/78
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
State of California, Department -of 4/28/78
Transportation
- 6/21/78
ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
* 7/14/76 (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of
(Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
* 7/14/76 (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage
(service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
C
* 7/14/76 (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility
(Report and Environmental Impact Report
*10/13/76 Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement
Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
* 9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting
on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan
*10/19/77 (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
C
*10/19/77 (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
C
*10/19/77 (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978,
(as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
C
*10/19/77 (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing
(on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed
(facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future
(meeting
10/26/77 Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties
* 1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978
1/24/78 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date
to February 28, 1978
* 2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978
* 4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and
interested parties
5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate
agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments
on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978
* 5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published
in The Register
*Board Actions
PHONES: (714)
540.2910
J. WAYNE SYLVESTER 962-2411
�0 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND
SECRETARY TO THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
P.O.BOX 8127-10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORMA 92708
1/24/78 Advised persons on mailing list
of extension of comment date from
from January 16, 1978, to
February 28, 1978
(Never did advise re extension of comment
date from February 28 to March 30.)
In letter to State Clearing House on
5/8/78, advised of time extension to
June 9, 1978. Referred to original comment
date of January 16, 1978, only.
6/15/78
BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
7/14/76 Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District
& City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
t
7/14/76 Approved participation in Step l Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR
re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
7/14/76 Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of
Feasibility Report and EIR
10/13/76 Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS
Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service
for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to
an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions
relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
10/19/77 Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
10/19/77 Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
10/19/77 Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established
January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must
be received on EIR
10/19/77 Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for
public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial
plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area,
to be considered by Board at a future meeting
1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved
112 (-I on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978.
2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978.
4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon
Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea
`<I z y City Hall
5 f�
5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
10/26/77 Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate
agencies and interested parties
5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and
to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that
the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978
5/15/78 Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register
6/15/78
BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
7/14/76 Received $ filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District
& City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
7/14/76 Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR
re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
7/14/76 Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of
Feasibility Report and EIR
10/13/76 Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS
Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service
for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
9/14/77 Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to
an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions
relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
10/19/77 Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
10/19/77 Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
10/19/77 Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established
January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must
be received on EIR
10/19/77 Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for
public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial
plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area,
to be considered by Board at a future meeting
1/11/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved
on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978.
2/08/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978.
4/12/78 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon
Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea
City Hall
5/10/78 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
10/26/77 Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate
agencies and interested parties
5/08/78 Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and
to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that
the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978
5/15/78 Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register
JUNE 14;' 19.78
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
REPORT ON THE MEETING OF THE WEST COAST DISCHARGERS RE
SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SEATTLE JUNE 7TH,
ALSO, YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON THE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN
PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS FOLDERS UNDER THIS ITEM RE SENATOR CRANSTON .
ANNOUNCE THAT NO MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS BEING
PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE ,
EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�.0
An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 , of Orange County, California, was held on June 21 ,
1978 , at Brea City Hall, 401 S. Brea Boulevard, Brea, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. . The roll was called
and a quorum of the Board was reported present.
Directors present: Directors Henry Wedaa, Chairman, Donald Holt, Sam Cooper,
Beth Graham, Bernard Houston, Vern Evans, David Ortiz, Bob Perry,
Roger Stanton and Louis Velasquez
Directors absent: Directors Ralph Clark, John Seymour and Don Smith
Present: Fred A, -Harper, Secretary pro tem
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , June 21, 1978.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.2 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify
the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries
on record taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, on the 21st
day of June , 1978 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my nd and affixed the official
seal of County Sanitation District No. 2 th' 21sY day of June
1978 .
Se r a , o d of Directors of
C u ty/ anit ion District No. 2
5-110
MEETING DATE June 21, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 2
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
CA NK)• - . . . t . .RIMA. . . . . . . . RILEY . .. .
WELSH). . . . . . . .SHARP. . . . . . . ANTHONY
RILEY - • • • • • • • •CLARK• • ••• -
�..,►� R I LEY .. .. . . . .ANTHONY. . . . ._ PERRY • •• • •-r• • •CULVER• • • • • .--.
ORTIZ . . . . . . ..EVANS. . . . . . . ORTIZ . . . . . . .. -EVANS• • -• • •
` DISTRICT 2 COOPER • • • • • • • •FOX• • • • • -••
• COOPER - • •• • •••GAMBINA• ••-
FRIED) . . . . . . . .WEDAA. . .. .. .. _._._ HUTCHISON)• • • • .GLOCKNER•- -
RASHFORD). . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . ._y� ROGET • • -•• • -• •GRAHAM• • •• .
RILEY) • . • •• •••CLARK. . . .. ..a, Q- MEYER)• • • • • • • • •GRIFFIN• • • --
COOPER) •- .. . . .{;)• . . . . . . . . ✓- y �RASHFORD). . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . .
ROGET . ... . . . ..GRAHAM. . . . . . ✓ WELLS)• • • • •- • •• 0 - - --_
�_ H USTON
WELLS . . . . . . . .HOUSTON• . . . . +� . _ L•ACAYQp). . . . . . .•HUDSON• • • • •
EVANS) - • • - • • • .ORTIZ- - - - - - ---C�L._.. SEITZ)t • • • • - - - •LAS7_LO. . . . .
CULV R)- -; • • - -PERRY• • • • • • • ✓ RYCKOFF). . . . .. .MC INNIS- • •
ROTH SEYMOUR WEISHAUPT?• • • •-MILLER• • • •-
• • • � � • • • � � - - � •� �`— FINLAYSON • • • • -OLSON• • ••• -
HOYT . . . . . . • . -SMITH• • • • • • • ----
ADLER) . . . .. . ..STANTON• • • ••_LI-1, EVANS). .. . . . . . .ORTIZ• • • • • •
WINTERS) . . . . ..VELASQUEZ• • •_ SHENKMAN) •• • • • •PATTINSON•-
CULVER • • • • • • • •PERRY• • •• •-
DISTRICT 3 NYBORG -. • • • • • .PRIEST• • - • -
ANTHO��VVY)• •• • • • •RILEY• • • • • -
ADLER . - •• - ...SVALSTAD• • • . CRANKI- -• • • • • • -RIMA• - - ••- -
MEYER)- -• • • • ••GRIFFIN• • •- • YOUNG). . . o . . . . .ROGET• • • • • -
PERRY) • • • - . . ..CULVER. . .. . . HUMM )
L -•• • -- • •RYCKOFF•- •-
COOPER) • - • • • • •GAMBINA• • • . • WELSH . . . . . o • . .SALTARELLI•
LACAYQ)• • • • • • •HUDSON• • • - • • RILEY • • • • . - . . -SCHMIT• - • • -
SEITZ) . . .• • . . .LASZLO- • - • • - ROTH)- .. . . . . . . .SEIYMOUR•= • •
WEISHAUPT • • • •MILLER• • .• • . WELSH)• -• •• • • • •SHARP• • • - • •
FINLAYSON - • • •OLSON. . . . . . . BAILEY)- • • • • • • •SHENKMAN• • -
EVANS) - - . . . . . .ORTIZ- • • • . . . SHEN MAN) • • • • • •SIEBERT• - • •
NYBORG) . : . . . . .PRIEST• • • • . .
HOYT • • •• • • • • • •SMITH. . . . .
•
YOUNG . . . ... . .ROGET. • - - •. . ADLER) STANTON
RILEY . . . . . . . .SCHMIT. . . . .. RYCKO F)• • • • • • •STRAUSS- • . .
ROTH)...
ADLER• • -• • • • • •SVALSTAD• • -
SHENKMA );- . . . .S I EBERT. . . . . ZOMMI K)• • •• • •• . . . ..
SYLVIA
ZOMMICK . . . . ..SYLVIA. . . . . . GAIDO). . . . . •• • •VARDOULIS• •
VELASQUEZ) . . . .WINTERS. . . . . IWINTE�S). • • • • . •VELASQUEZ• -
(FRIED • •• • • • • ••WEDAA• - •- - •
DISTRICT 5 �VELASQUEZ) - o
RYCKOFF-)• • • • • • •WILLIAMS• •HUMMEL . . • • - • •RYCKOFF• . . . • • •WI NTERS- • • •
ANTHONY� . . . . . •RILEY• • • • • • •
RYCKOFF • - • • • •STRAUSS• • • • • OTHERS
DISTRICT 6 HARPER. . . . .
(RYCKOFF) ... .. .MC INNIS. . . . -SYLVESTER-.
CRANK . . . .. . ..RIMA. . . . . . .. LEWIS. . . . ..
RILEY) . . .. - - . •ANTHONY- • • • - CLARKE. . . ..
BROWN. . . ..._
DISTRICT 7
GAIDO . . - - • • • -VARDOULIS• • -
HOYT) • • • • • • - • •SMITH• • • • • • • WOODRUFF.-..
RILEY . . . . . . ••CLARK• . • • • • • HOW RD. . . ..
. . . .
ORTIZ� H
. . ... • • •EVANS. . . . . o• . . .
(HUTCHISON)• • • •GLOCKNER• • • . HUUNTNT. . .. . ..
WELSH) •• - - • • • •SALTARELLI • • KEINE Y. . . . .. . . ..
KEN
RYCKOFF)• • • • • •WILLIAMS- • • •
LYNCH. . . . . .
DISTRICT 11 MADDOX. . . . .
MARTINSON.-
BAILEY . . . . . . .vSHENKMAN. . - - PIERSALL.'. .
rds✓ SHENKMAN) . . . ..PATTINSON. . . STEVENS. . ..
RILEY) • • -• - •••SCHMIT• • - • • • TRAVERS. -..
6/14/73
DISTRICT NO. 2 - Adjourned Regular Meeting
June 21, 1978
7 : 30 p.m.
Brea City Hall
RE: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN)
Wedaa: Please come to order. Gentlemen, before we can begin, we need to
appoint a Secretary pro tem. Could I have a motion to appoint Mr.
Fred Harper to that commission. Motion moved and seconded. Are
there any objections? Hearing none -- so ordered. Could we then
have a roll call by Fred.
Harper: Wedaa,
Wedaa: Here
Harper: Holt
Ho' . Here
Harper: Clark
Harper: Riley
Harper: Fox
Cooper: Cooper sitting in for Fox
Harper: *Graham
Harper: Roget
Harper: Houston
Houston: Here
Harper: Ortiz
Ortiz : Here
Harper: Evans
Evans: Here
Ha 'er *Perry
Harper Culver
Harper: Seymour
Ha. �r: Roth
Harper: Smith
Harper: Hoyt
Harper: *Stanton
Harper: Adler
Harper: Velasquez
Velasquez : Here
*ARRIVED LATER - SEE FINAL ROLL CALL SHEET
Harper: We have a quorum, Mr. Chairman
Wedaa: Thank you, Mr. Harper. The purpose of tonight's meeting is for
District No. 2 to conduct 0. Sr'-In
hearing on the Draft Environ-
*M01mental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. The
Hearing is now open. Mr. Reid would you like to update the members
of the Board and the audience relative to the current status of
the EIR and tell us something about the written comments that were
received.
Reid: Mr. Chairman, this project has been with us since July of 1976
and has underwent a lot of changes. I've attempted to summarize
them in the Manager' s Report. Because of , let' s say, the population
projections made by the Department of Finance based on SCAG 76, they
came up with a projection of 2 ,500 people. The facilities plan
estimated about a 10,000 population so the funding levels of the
project were in severe doubt. In addition, SCAG, the Executive
Committee came out and they adopted the portion of the project
from the L. A. County -- excuse me -- in the Orange County area
they agreed with our philosophy of sewaging the area and taking
the ponds out of the area but in the San Bernadino County, they
objected to it and they didn't go along with SCAG' s region-wide
growth policy and they would like to see alternative forms of
treatment up there -- either reclamation or say upgrading some of
..r the existing systems up there. At the present time, in the
Facilities Plan, the consultant recommended the alternative I,
which was sewering the whole area to the Orange County Sanitation
Districts. Chino Basin Water District has expressed to us that
the cost of sewering to Orange County far outweighs the local
alternative of local treatment and because of the other contraints
mentioned, we feel that at this time in the Districts best interest,
and also the City of Brea' s interest to o with Alternative III,
which would be to -- a modificatinn of Altprnative III -- which
would be to sewer the Brea portion of the project and take the
po onstruct the Carbon Canyon dam interceptor
up to the dam, amend the District 2 Master Plan to take over the
pump sta on an eave it for Brea and the land owners or property
owners in the area o work out some kind of feasibility or assess-
------------
ment district or a way to fund the local sewers up there. In
talking to the Chino Basin people, they have indicated that the
County is a ready proceeding to set up a sewer maintenance district
up there and upgrade some of the existing systems so it seems that
at all levels t e project seems to De proceeding -- let's sav with
the local solution If we go the local route, it no longer becomes
a region-wide issue and SCAG or the State or EPA no longer become
involved; but this is without the support of EPA State Funds. The
comments that we received so far have been extensive and they pretty
much favor or have suggested what is the District' s staff' s
recommendation at this point.
Wedaa: That is No. 3
Reid: Yes, that is No. 3 with certain modifications At this time after
receiving the public testimony, it would be our recommendation and
the EIR recommends the local alternative and complete the EIR and
submit to the State and EPA for approval and receive our Sty I
monies. That concludes my report.
Wedda: Thank you Dennis. All right, do any members of the Board have
any questions of staff before we take public testimony. Mr. Cooper.
Conner: I 'm just filling in at this time -- when you say to be worked out
- between the owners and Brea, could you elaborate a little more on
that.
Reid: Okay, at the present time, Brea , in a letter sent to us on June
14, 1977, notified us that they have a 10! overflow line from the
2 -
Brea ponds to the park system that' s connected to the District 2
system. At this point in time, it is a technical violation --
let' s say a local sewer would have to go in to take the pond
out of service; but before that could happen the area would
have to annex, or a monthly user charge would have to be levied.
Cooper: Now, that would be attributed to who now? The new people, the old
people or the new and old?
Reid: It would be attributed to those who are connected to the system.
Since it' s a Brea line that was .connected,-1,belieye_that__it
would be the responsibility of Brea.
Cooper: What I'm trying to find out is that if we have 500 homes up in
plus a mobile home park and you want to work the
sewer in and the people who want to build in that area, who is
ultimately responsible to pay for the cost of putting that in --
the new people the old people. . . . . .
Wedaa: Mr. Harper , would you respond?
H- -)er: Mr. Chairman, it would be the property owners in the area because
they must annex to the Sanitation District.
Cooper: Okay, then that would be outside -- you say annex. . .
Harper: Well, it' s all -- nothing behind the dam is in District 2.
Cooper: No, but what I'm trying to determine , in order to put this sewer
line in -- let' s clarify this because there' s lots of people here
who own some of the propery -- if the sewer line is put in, who
ultimately has to pay for that sewer line -- the new people coming
in or the old people _or the combination of?
Harper: I would say the combination of because they will all benefit from it.
Cooper: Okay, thanks, that' s what I wanted to determine.
Wedaa: Now, are there any further questions of staff by any members of the
Board? All right, let' s move on to the next phase of this hearing
which is the consideration of any public hearings -- or oral comments
by members of the public who might like to speak on the subject. Is
there any member of dience that would like to say something
r.s on this subject? Would you come forward please and identify yourself
for the record, with your name and address.
- 3 -
White: My name is Ron White, 4061 Germander, Irvine, California and our
company Heritage Development has title to a substantial land
in the Carbon Canyon Area and we are interested in, I believe, the
`'O solution mentioned on the last page of this brochure here to solve
the problem at the local level , next to the last paragraph. And
I'm not sure if I understand what Dennis ment by the Alternate III as
being recommended.
Wedaa: Is there a specific problem, or would like us to explain it all
over again or we' ll do either one?
White: I don't want to take up a lot of time but Alternate III is upgrading
the existing treatment and disposal system -- what does that mean?
Reid: Let me clarify, it involves some modification but it involves exactly
what was stated here on the back -- sewering the portion in
Orange County and leaving the area upstream in the County alone to
either consider reclamation or status quo. The recommendation number
III, Alternative III, is--actually it' s the recommendation to funded
by local monies. As far as this project being sent to the State
we would not receive any funding so it may go to the State in the
form of no project. Do you understand that?
*AW
White: Yes, we are interested in seeing a sewer assessment District formed
from this local level approach. Okay! Thank you .
Wedaa: Thank you. Are there further comments from the audience on this
subject?
Keith: Milo Keith, Keith & Associates in Santa Ana. I represent the City
of Brea as a city engineer tonight. We have followed this problem
of the Carbon Canyon area with the staff of the District and we are
representative on the Sanitation District' s staff and if the
Directors need any clarification on the planning of the city for
this area, I would be glad to answer them.
Wedaa: All right, since we apparently have no further comments at the moment
from any members of the audience, do any members of the Board have
any questions to the city engineer concerning this issue? Okay,
before I close the public hearing, is there anyone else who would
like to speak on the matter? The Hearing is closed. All right
let' s move on to item 3, which is consideration the motion directing
os
staff and consulting engineer to prepare Final Environmental Impact
Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. Could I have a motion?
I have a motion and seconded. /Are there any objections to the motion?
- 7 -
Harper: Mr. Chairman, there is one item which I would like to include in
the proceedings and that is to receive and file a listing of the
actions to date relative to the Environmental Impact Report for the
Carbon Canyon Faclities Plan. It has to do with actions that the
Board has taken since July 14 , 1976. It' s just a listing of the
actions.
Wedaa: Okay, could I have a motion to put it on the agenda as say 2F?
Is that satisfactory?
Harper: Yes
Wedaa: All right a motion and seconded. Any objections to adding that item
to the agenda? Could I have a motion to accept it? Motion and
seconded. Any objections to acceptance? Appearing none, motion
carried unanimously. Moving on to item number 3, the Final EIR
could I have a motion . . . . . sorry. . . .Are there any objections
to the motion on item number 3. Hearing none the motion passes
unanimously. Let' s move to item number 4 -- let' s have a motion
considering resolution No. 78-123-2. A motion and seconded. Could
I have -- let' s have a roll call vote, Mr. Harper.
Harper: Yes, Mr. Chairman. Wedaa
We(' a: Yes
Harper: Holt
Holt: Yes
Harper: Clark, Riley, Cooper
Cooper: Yes
Harper: Graham
Graham: Yes
Harper: Houston
Houston: Yest
Harper: Ortiz
Ortiz Yes
Harper: Evans
Evans Yes
Harper: Perry
Perry: Yes
Harper: Seymour, Roth, Smith, Hoyt, Stanton, Adler, Velasquez
Velasquez : Yes
We a: : All right, the motion passes unanimously. Item No. 5, Mr. Harper
lv. is there any other business or communication?
Harper: We have none, Mr. Chairman
Wedaa: Members of the Board, are there any other xtx=x]DFx$xr-ztx7&xx business
items or communications for the Board to consider tonight? Hearing
S -
none, let' s move to item 6 -- motion to adjourn i seconded, • any
objections? The meeting is adjourned. l ,5
G 6�w
-6 -