HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-06-21 OCRCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
June 15, 1978
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 2
WEDNESDAY; JUNE 21) 1978 -7:30 P.M.
BREA CITY HALL
401 S. BREA BOULEVARD
BREAJ CALIFORNIA
(SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE)
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of June 14, 1978, the Board
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,
will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The
purpose of this meeting is for an informal public hearing on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan.
JWS:rb
N
~
w
(.!) z
<( a::
0
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
R!VF.:RSIDE FRWY @ DI ST. 2 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEET I NG
~-~~~--~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~ WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 1978, 7:30 P.M. I AT BREA c ITV HALL
--....,-........ ------
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Col.mty Sanitation Districts
of Orange Cou~ty, California
DISTRICT No. 2
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 21J 1978 -7:30 P.M.
(1) Roll call
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(2) Consideration of actions re la ti ve to informal hearing on. Draft
Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
(a) Open hearing
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written
comments relative·to the Draft· Environmental .impact
Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders)
(c) Consideration of oral comments, if any
(d) General discussion and staff comments
(e) Close hearing
(3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting engineer to
prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving amendment to
agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final
Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a
per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00
(5) Other business and communications, if any
(6) Consideration of motion to adj~urn to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978
II
BOARDS OF DIREC1'0RS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICT Noo 2
ADJOURNED ·REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 21~ 1978 -7:30 P.M.
(1) Roll call
(la) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tern
Post Office Box 8127
1 Q844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
ADJOURNMENTS POSTED.~
COMP & MILEAGE •.•.• ~.
FILES SET UP ...... \r:::: ......... .
RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED.!=""'
LETTERS WRITTEN ... L,"_
MINIJTES WRITTEN ... k.::';:._
MINUTES MLED ...... k.':::'. .....
(2) Consideration of actionsrelative to informal hearing on Draft
FILE ---·-·· ... Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
LETTER ... _ ........ .
A/C __ TKLR ... . (a) Open hearing
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file wri~ten
comments relative to the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders)
(c) Consideration of oral coJtDUents, if any
(d) General discussion and staff connnents
fl LE ....... -.. -···-
LEA/lTCER~KLR ..... ; .. ~ (e) Close hearing ~ (_~) \\.~~ ~'6~~~ .
____ (3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consul ting engineer to
f\/\.\ ~ prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities ____ ,., Plan
(4)
M\~
Roll Call Vote or Cast
fl LE . .UnanlmV' Ballot
~ ............. .
~~(S)
(6)
. ~~-I
Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving ameaemeat to
agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final
Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a
per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00
Other business and conununications, if any
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6 :00 p.m_, June 22, 1978 f'/;55
f
)
I ! ~AGENDA ITEM #2 (b)
Jri ~ten comments rece ived r e lative to Draft Environmental Impact
Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities P l a n:
Agency
City of Brea
State of Cali fo rnia, State Water Resources
Contro l Board, Di v ision of Water Qu a lity
State of Ca liforn i a , State Water Reso urc es
Control Board, Di vis ion of Water Quality
City o f Brea
City of God, Saint Jos eph's Hill of Hope
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
County of Ora n ge , Environmental Management
Ag e ncy, Advance P l anning Div ision
Don McBride Com pany
State of Ca lifornia , S tate Water Resourc es
Contro l Board , Division of Water Qua lity
County of S a n Bernardino , En v ironmenta l
I mprovemen t Agency
South ern Californi a Assoc iation o f Governments
State of California , Depa rtme nt of Parks
and Recreation
State of California , Depa rtment of Fish
and Game
State of Cali fo rni a , Sta te Water Resourc es
Contro l Board, Division of Water Qua lity
State of Ca li f o r nia , Department of
Transpor tation
Dated
7/07/77
7/0 8/77
8/04/77
10/14/77
1/09/78
1/09/7 8
1 /12/78
1/26/78
1 /3 0/7 8
2/15/78
3/08/78
4/20/78
4/27/78
4/27/7 8
4/28/78
* 7/14/76
'...,.,;
* 7/14/76
* 7/14/76
*10/13/76
* 9/14/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
10/26/77
* 1/11/78
1/24/78
* 2/08/78
* 4/12/78
6/21/78
ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
(Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of
(Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
(
(Approved participatfon in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage
(service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
(
(Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility
(Report and Environmental Impact Report
Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement
Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meetipg to an adjourned meeting
on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon
Faci Ii ties Plan
(Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
(
(Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
(
(Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978,
(as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
(
(Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing
(on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed
(facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future
(meeting
Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978
Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date
to February ~8, 1978
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978
Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and
interested parties
5/08/78
* 5/10/78
'-"
Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate
agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments
on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published
in The Register
*Board Actions
I u
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -12 3 -2
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH
ECOS MANAGEMENT CR ITERIA RE PREPARATION OF
FINA L ENVIRONMENTA L IMPACT REPORT ON CARBON
CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
A RESOLUT I ON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SAN I TATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA , APPROV I NG AMENDMENT NO . 1
TO AGREEMENT WITH ECOS MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR
PREPARATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IM PACT
REPORT ON THE CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of Co unty Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE , DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Ame nd ment No. 1 dated to that certain
Agreement dated October 13, 1976, by and between County Sanitation District No . 2
of Orange County and ECOS Management Criteria, authori zing preparation of the
Fin al Environmental Impa ct Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2 . Tha t payment for said work will be on a per diem fee basis
for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000 .00; and,
Section 3 . Th a t the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized to execute said Amendment No. 1 in form approved b y the General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an a djourned re5J l a r meeting he ld June 21, 1978 .
June 1 5, 1978
MANAGER'S REPORT
CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
AND DRAFT EIR
COUN TY SANITATION DI STRI CTS
ol OR ANGE CO UNTY. C ALIF ORNIA
P.O .BOX 8127
10844 EL LI S AVENU E
FOUNTAIN VAL LEY. CALI FORNIA 92 708
(714) 540-2910
(714)96 2-24 11
Th e Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Re g iona l
Water Qu a lity Cont ro l Board 1 s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that
was exper i encing problems with the existing sewe r age dispo sa l systems
and did n ot me e t the water quality objectives for the San ta Ana River
Basin. The area was p l ace d by the RWQCB on the Gr a nt Funded Proje ct
li st and on August 11, 1 976 , Sanitation Distric t No . 2 filed a grant
app li cation with the State and Environmental Protect ion Agency and
entered into a j oint agreement , as l ead agency, with th e City of
Br ea a nd Chino Basin Munic ip a l Water District.
The Facilities Pl an Report inves tigates the feasibility of sewerage
service for the Carbon Canyon a rea, and the Environmental Impa ct
Report the resultant impacts . Four a l ternatives are discusse d, with
No . 1 being the r e c ommende d altern a tive by the F ac ilities P l an con -
sultant.
1 . Sewe ring to County Sanitat ion District No . 2
of Or ange Coun t y sy stem -$3.l millio n
2. Construc tion of l oca l treatment plants -$3.4
million
3. Upgrade existing treatment and disposa l systems -
$1 .1 mill ion
4. No project
Th e RWQCB h as do cumented that the pre sent sewage systems and their
operation are defi c i e nt in na ture and genera lly recogni zed as a
t emporary so lution until the problem of tota l waste disposal is
solved in the study area.
The consul tant recornme n8ati on includes serving an a rea in the .City
of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and a n area in San Bernardino
County . The District No. 2 adop t ed Master Plan at this point has no
prov ision for serving the area outside the county line and it wo ul d
r equire complete Board action to do such.
Since the project h as b een out for public review, a num ber of important
facto rs n ow make the most f easibl e Al ternative No. 3 . The f actor s are :
1. Th e SWRCB found insuffi cient justi fic a tion for the
l ower reach es of thf:! project b elow Ca r bon Canyon
Dam to serve the existing p opulat ion a nd found it
growth-in ducing .
2. The SCAG Executive Committee rules that the upper
p ort ion of the projccL (S an Bernardino County) was
in consis t ent with r egiona l grow th for ecas t policies .
3. The project f un ding eligibil ity b ased on E-0 popu-
l nt.ion forecast was estima ted to be 2500 p eop le.
Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are ab out
10 ,000 people . If Slate and Federa l funding were
rec eived, there would be severe growth restr ictions.
It i s the staff 's reconm1e nd a tion at this time to conclude the public
h ear ing process on the EIR an d have th e Dis tricts ' EIR consultant
fin a lize the EIR . (This will require an amendment to the contract
bec ause of the ch anged recommended alternat i ve r equires add i tiona l
work). The Faci l ities Plan and EI R wi l l be submitted to the EPA and
SWRCB for the District to r eceive full payment for the St·ep I work .
To so l ve the problem a t th e local leve l, it is recommen d e d that
Sanitation District No . 2 build the Carbon Ca nyon Darn Int ercep tor to
the Dam and am end th e Master Plan to t ake o ver th e pump station ab o ve
th e Dam and b uild a new on e . Brea would reta in the park sewer syst~m
and bui ld a 10 11 or 1 2" line to conn ec t the p o n ds and take tb e m out of
service . At present, Brea hc:.s connection from the ponds via a 4 " l ine
to the park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will h ave to
be l evied aga inst the h omeowners for sewe r service, or a contract
e nt ered into with the City, o r the area must annex (which would c ost
about $140,000). Brea charges no specia l assessments or fees f or
op eration of the ponds.
The District can proceed a nd build its amended Naster P l an facilities
now . Befor e Brea builds its link from the Park to the ponds it must
a nn ex those areas that the ponds serve. Estimate d cost~ to Brea for
annexat ion a nd construc tion a r e about $400 ,000. B~e a will h ave to
re s olve th is cost issue with itself a nd the h omeow ners .
Fr e d A . Harper
Gene r a l Mana ge r
June 15, 1978
MANAGER'S REPORT
CARBON CANYON FACI LITIES PLAN
AND DRAFT EIR
COUN TY SANITATIO N DI STRIC TS
or 0 RA NG E C OUNTY . c ALIFORNIA
P.0 .BO X 6 127
10644 EL LI S AVE'NU[
FO UNTAIN VALLEY. CALif011NIA 92706
(714) 540-2910
(714)962·24 11
Th e Carbon Canyon draina ge a rea was ide ntifi e d in the Reg ional
Water Qu a li ty Contro l Board's (RWQ CB) Basin Pl a n as a n area tha t
was experiencin g p rob l ems with the existing sewerage dis posal systems
a nd d id not meet th e water qua li ty object i ves fo r the Santa Ana River
Ba sin. The a r ea was placed by the RWQCB on the Gr a nt Funded Project
list and on Augu s t 11, 1976 , Sanit ation District No . 2 filed a grant
app li cation with the Sta te and Environme ntal Prote ction Age n cy a n d
entered into a joint a gre em e nt, as l ea d agency, with th e City of
Br ea and Chino Basin Municipa l Water District.
Th e Fac i li ties P l an Report investiga t es the feasib i lity of s ewerage
service for the Carbon Ca n yon area, and the Env ironmen tal Impact
Report th e result an t i mpacts. Four alternativ es a r e di s cussed, with
No. 1 being the re c ommended a lternative by the Facilities P l a n con -
sultant.
1. Sewe ring t o County Sa nitation Distr ict No. 2
of Or a n ge County system -$3.l million
2 . Construc t i on of l oca l t reatment plants -$3.4
million
3. Upgrade ex isting treatment a nd disposal systems -
$1. 1 mill ion ( ' l
/
4 . No pro j ect
The RWQCB has do cument ed tha t th e present sewage s ys t e ms a nd their
op era tion a re deficien t in n a ture and gen e r a lly reco gni ze d as a
t emporary so lution until th e problem of t ota l waste disposa l is
solve d i n the study a rea .
The con su l tan t recomme nda tion i nc ludes servin g a n a r ea in the City
o f Br ea which i s outside District No . 2 a nd an a rea in San Bernardino
County . Th e Di strict No. 2 a dopt ed Master Plan at thi s point h as no
prov ision for s erving the area outside the coun ty line and it wou l d
r equire complete Boar d act i on to do such.
Since the proj ect hn s been out for pub li c review, a numb er of importan t
factors n ow make the most feas i b l e Alt e rnative No . 3 . The facto rs are:
1 . Th e SWRCB fo u nd i n suffi ci ent j us t ificat i o n f o r t h e
l ower r eac h es of t h e proj ect b e low Carb on Canyo n
Dam to serve th e existin g p op ul a tion and fo un d it
g r ow th -inducin g .
2 . The SCAG Execu t i ve Comm i ttee ru l es t h at the u ppe r
p o r tion o f t h e project (Sn n Bern ardino County ) was
i n con s i s t e nt wi t h regiona l g rowth f or e c ast p o licies .
3 . Th e p roject f u nding eligibility base d on E -0 popu -
l at i on foreca st was estimated t o be 2500 people .
Actua l estimates for the Fac i lities P lan are about
1 0 ,000 people . I f State and FederaJ funding were
r e c e i ved, there wo u ld be severe g r owth restr i ction s .
I t is the staff 's recomme ndation at this time to conc l ude the pub lic
hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' EIR consultant
finalize the EIR . (This will require an amendment to the c-ontract
b ecau se of the c h anged recomme nded a l tern at i ve req u ires additiona l
work) . The Faci l ities P l an and EIR wi ll be s u bmitted to the EPA and
SWRCB for t he Distr i ct to receive ful l payment for the Step I wo r k .
To so l ve the prob l em at t h e l oca l l eve l, i t i s recommended t h at
Sa ni tation Di stric t No . 2 b uild t h e Carb on Canyon Dam I ntercepto r to
th e Dam and amen d the Master Plan to take over th2 pmop station above
th e Dam and build a new one . Brea would retain the p:irk sewer systein
and build a 10" or 12 " l i ne to connect t h e ponds an d take them out of
service. At present , Brea has connection from the ponds via a 4 " line
t o the park system to handl e overflows . A monthly fee will have to
b e l evied against the homeowners for sewer service , or a contract
e n tered into with the City , or t h e area must annex (which would c9st
about $140,000). Brea c h arges no spe c ial assessments or fees fo r
operation of the ponds .
Th e Di strict can proceed and bui l d its amended Mas t er Plan fac i l i ties
n ow . Befor e Brea bui l ds its link from t h e Park to tl ~e ponds i t mus t
ann ex those areas that the ponds serve . E st imat~d cost~ to Brea f or
annexation and constr uction are a b out $400,000 . Brea wil l h ave t o
r esolve this cos t· issue with itse l f and the h omeowners .
Fr e d A. Ha r per
GenerCJ.l Manager
15, 1978
CARBON CAN N FACILITIE
a _ l ( r1 ·-l ( AND FT EIR
COUNTY SANITAT ION DISTRICTS
ol 0 RANGE CO UN TY . C l\LIFORN IA
P.O .BOX 8 127
10844 ELLIS AVE NU[
FOUNT A VALLEY . CALI FOnN IA 92708
~~~<_>-~910
(714~
~ ~~ ~"'< c:,,J'vr ~ )GVt:~J
The Carbon Canyon drainage a rea was identified in the Regional
Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that
was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems
and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa. Ana River
Bas ~.!:;.i. (h <j.rfr a was placed -1.1y tee R1fQGB-on the Grant Funded Project lis ftA a~d ~Atl~ust 11, 19 6, S~tj.it ~tion District No. 2 filed a grant
app icati ' wi e ~~ and iE'"n;Ironmental Protection Agency ~nd
entered into a joint agreemen~/~as lead agency, with the City f
Brea and Chino Basin Munici_pa ~~e~t1r~t ~ ~;(I<.)
The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage
service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental I mpact
Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives· are discussed, with
No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con-
sultant.
1.
2.
Sewering to County Sanitation District
of Orange County system -$3.1 million
Construction of l ~cal treatment plants
million ~J ~ .
¥7:.I J .
-$3.4
3. _Up grad~ e~istin,.g t~eatT ent and disposal systems -
$1.1 million fk'(I' '~'Z1 ·-:J tnt§j-y1 ec,.:t ,
4. No project
The RWQCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their
operation are deficient in nature and generally recogni z ed as a
temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is
solved in the study area.
The consultan ~~recommendation includes serving an a rea in the City
of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino
County. The District No. 2 adopted Master Pl?n at this point has no
provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would
require ~Board action to do such.
Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important
factors now make ~t t!""mos t fcseitrl'eo Alternative No. 3 V The factors are:
Jt~&~·
1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the
lower reaches of the project below Carbon Canyon .
Dam to serve the existing population and ~, it · . Ii
growth-inducing. J.. c,.....-~..f
2. The SCAG E~ecutive Co~ittee ;ule} that the upper
portion of the proje~t (San Bernardino County) was
inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies.
3 . The project .funding eligibility based on E-0 popu-
lation forecast was estimated to be 2..,5 00 people.
Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about
10,000 people. If State and Federal fundin g were
received, there would be severe growth restrictions.
It is the staff's. recommendation 'at this time to conclude .the public
.hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts'.~ consultant
fina~ize the EIR. (T l.ll-~will require .an amen dJJii ent to the contract .
because o r efi e @ flfifig ~~:re corrirnended ·alternative~t'g_~es -additional
work). The Facilities Plan and EIR ~l be submitted to the EPA _ and
SWR~B for the District to re~e~ve full · p ~~} ~the Step Ir~·
To solve the problem at the local .level, it is recommended that
Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon .Canyon Dam Interceptor to
the Dam and ·amend the Master Plan to take over the p ~p station above
the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system
and build a 1611 or 12•' line to connect the ponds and take them out of
service. At present, Brea h as ... connection . from the ponds via a "'1:!::-line
to the .park system to handle overflows. A· monthly fee wil l have to
be lev ied against the homeovmers for sewer service, or a contract
entered into with the City, or the area must.annex (which would c9st
~~~r;~o ~~o !~ ~1t.:;~\ . c ~.t s i:c t:2lt ri£~L ~-!1" A~ ~ . ~ Q.,N:O: ,.;._ Irv,..,.~. (Jh. .
The Distric'l::,,can proceed an bui Pdits amende Master Plan f a cilities
now. Before Brea builds its ·link from the l'ark to the ponds it must
annex those areas that the pon g s serve. Est imate·d co.st/ to Brea for .
annexation . and con~tructic;>n ~-ins t $400, 000. ~rea wil J t;1w -~o -..
re 'S-Ql m;~ t h i s s est.,.:..j,s sue w-1:-t::h its.e l L an d t b e-h@me®WR.oeTS . .. "" ~ ~
.N ~ ~c.r..J~ wJL 4l... ~~ .
* 7/14/76
'W
* 7/14/76
* 7/14/76
*10/13/76
* 9/14/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
10/26/77
* 1/11/78
1/24/78
* 2/08/78
* 4/12/78
4/24/78
5/08/78
* 5/10/78
~
5/15/78
6/21/78
ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
(Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of
(Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
(
(Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage
(service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
(
(Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility
(Report and Environmental Impact Report
Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement
Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting
on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan
(Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
(
(Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
(
(Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978,
(as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
(
(Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing
(on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed
(facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future
(meeting
Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978
Advised appropriate agencies and interested-parties of extension of comment date
to February 28, 1978
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978
Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall
Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and
interested parties
Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate
agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments
on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published
in The Register
*Board Actions
'~
RE: AGENDA ITEM #2(b)
Written comments received relative to Draft Environmental Impact
Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan:
Agency
City of Brea
State of California, State Water Resources
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
State of California, State Water Resources
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
City of Brea
City of God, Saint Joseph's Hill of Hope
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
County of Orange, Environmental Management
Agency, Advance Planning Division
Don McBride Company
State of California, State Water Resources
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
County of San Bernardino, Environmental
Improvement Agency
Southern California Association of Governments
State of California, Department of Parks
and Recreation
State of California, Department of Fish
and Game
State of California, State Water Resources
Control Board, Division of Water Quality
State of California, Department-of
Transportation
Dated
7/07/77
7/08/77
8/04/77
10/14/77
1/09/78
1/09/78
1/12/78
1/26/78
1/30/78
2/15/78
3/08/78
4/20/78
4/27/78
4/27/78
4/28/78
* 7/14/76
~
* 7/14/76
* 7/14/76
*10/13/76
* 9/14/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
*10/19/77
10/26/77
* 1/11/78
1/24/78
* 2/08/78
* 4/12/78
6/21/78
ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
(Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of
(Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
(
(Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage
(service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
(
(Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility
(Report and Environmental Impact Report
Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement
Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting
on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan
(Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
(
(Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
(
(Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978,
(as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
(
(Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing
(on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed
(facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future
(meeting
Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978
Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date
to February 28, 1978
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978
Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities
Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall
4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and
interested parties
5/08/78
* 5/10/78
~
Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate
agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments
on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR
from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published
in The Register
*Board Actions
1/24/78
PHONES: (714)
S40-2910
J. WAYNE SYLVESTER 962-2411
DI RECTOR OF FINANCE AND
SECRETARY TO THE BOARDS OF DI RECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNiA 92708
Advised persons on mailing list
of extension of comment date from
from January 16, 1978, to
February 28, 1978
(Never did advise re extension of comment
date from February 28 to March 30.)
In letter to State Clearing House on
5/8/78, advised of time extension to
June 9, 1978. Referred to original comment
date of January 16, 1978, only.
7/14/76
7/14/76
7/14/76
10/13/76
9/14/77
10/19/77
10/19/77
10/19/77
10/19/77
1/11/78
i / z c..f
2/08/78
4/12/78
1..fl2 y
s /'(?
5/10/78
6/15/78
BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District
& City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR
re sewerage service for Sle:py Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of
Feasibility Report and EIR
Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS
Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service
for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to
an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions
relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established
January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must
be received on EIR
Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for
public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial
plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area,
to be considered by Board at a future meeting
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved
on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978.
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978.
Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon
Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea
City Hall .
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
10/26/77
4/24/78
5/08/78
. 5/15/78
Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties
Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate
agencies and interested parties
Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and
to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that
the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978
Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register
7/14/76
7/14/76
7/14/76
10/13/76
9/14/77
10/19/77
10/19/77
10/19/77
10/19/77
1/11/78
2/08/78
4/12/78
5/10/78
6/15/78
BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN
Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District
& City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon
drainage area
Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR
re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of
Feasibility Report and EIR
Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS
Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service
for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area
Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to
an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions
relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan
Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan
Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established
January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must
be received on EIR
Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for
public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial
plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area,
to be considered by Board at a future meeting
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved
on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978.
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978.
Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon
Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea
City Hall
Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received
on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
10/26/77
4/24/78
5/08/78
5/15/78
Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon
Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties
Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate
agencies and interested parties
Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and
to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that
the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978
Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register
JUNE l ~J lg78
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
REPORT ON THE MEETING OF THE WEST COAST DISCHARGERS RE
SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SEATTLE JUNE 7TH,
ALSO, YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON THE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN
.. . .
PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS' FOLDERS UNDER THIS ITEM .RE SENATOR CRANSTON.
ANNOUNCE THAT NO MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS BEING
PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE.
EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 , of Orange County, California , was held on June 21
19 78 , at Brea City Hall, 401 S . Brea Boulevard, Brea, Ca l ifornia.
The Ch airman ca ll ed the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.. The rol l was ca lled
and a quorum of the Boa rd was reported present.
Directors present:
Directors absent:
Present:
Adjournment
Directors Henry Wed aa, Chairman, Donald Holt, Sam Cooper,
Beth Graham, Bernard Houston, Vern Evans, David Ortiz, Bob Perry,
Roger Stanton and Loui s Velasquez
Directors Ralph Clark, John Seymour a n d Don Smith
Fred A.-Harper, Secretary pro tern
* * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Bo ard of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 7 :55 p .m., June 21, 1978.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SY LVESTER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.2 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify
the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute e n tries
on record taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 , of Orange County , Ca lifornia, on the 21st
day of June , 1978
IN WI TNESS \\'HEREOF, I have hereunto
seal of County Sani t ation District No. 2
19 78
S-110
MEETING DATE June 21, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS -=-2 _____ _
DISTRICT 1
~CRANK) ••••• , •• RIMA ••••••• ·--_. _
WELSH) •••••••• SHARP •••••• ·----__
RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ·----__
ORTIZ) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ·----__
DISTRICT 2 ~q
FRI ED).·.~·.· .WEDAA • • ... • • -~ .:{__ --.
RASHFORD) ••••• HOLT •••••••• .-IL .;:L_ __
RILEY) •••••••• CLARK ••• ···-~~ --
COOPER) • • • • • • -~ • • • • • • • • v' _z__ --ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM •••••• V _:f__ __
.WELLS) •• · •••••• HOUSTON.·. • -~ ~ --
EVANS)······· -ORTIZ······-~ Ji__ --CULV~R) ••••••• PERRY ••• •••• V _l:_ __
ROTH ••• .' ••• ·.SEYMOUR····-~ _a.._ __
HOYT •• • • • • • • ·SM ITH· • • • • • ·~ t --ADLER) •••••••• STANTON.····~ __
WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ···~ -· _
DISTRICT 3 .
(ADLER).·.~ ••••• SVALSTAD • • • ·--___ _
(MEYER) •••••• • -GRIFFIN·····--___ _
lPERRY) ......... CULVER.·····--___ _
(COOP.ER) ••••••• GAMBINA • • • • ·--___ _
LACAYO) ~ • • • • • • HUpSON • • • • • ·----__
SEITZ) •• ~····· LASZLO······------
WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER •••• ··--___ _
FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON·······
EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ· •• ·.·.------
NYBORG) • ~ ••••• PR I EST •• • • • .------
YOUNG) •••••••• ROG ET ••••••• ~====
RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT ••••••
Roni>.~•.• ..•.•. SEYMOUR ••••• -== ==
SHENKMAN),.; •••• SIEBERT •••• ·--___ _
ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA ••••••
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····-== ==
DISTRICT 5
~l-fUMMEL) • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------
ANTHONY) ······RI LEY· • • • • • ·----·--
RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ·------
·DISTRICT 6
(RYCKOfF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• _____ _
(CRANK) •••••••• RIMA ••• ~ ••••
(RiLEY) · •••••••• ANTHONY •••• === == ==
DISTRICT 7
(GAIDO) ••• • • • • ·VARDOUL·I·s. • -----~HOYT).··.···· .SMITH·······--___ _
RILEY)······· -CLARK·······--___ _
ORTI z) • · • · .. · · ·EVANS· • • • • • ·--___ _
(HUTCHISON).· •• GLOCKNER.···--___ _
{WELSH) •••• •• •• SALTARELLI··--___ _
(RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS····------
DISTRICT 11
BAILEY ••••••• -SHENKMAN.... •
SHENKMAN) ••••• PATTINSON ••• ------
RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT······ · ====
S/14/73
JOINT BOARDS
RILEY ·········ANTHONY····----
RILEY • ········CLARK······----
PERRY • ···.-~.··CULVER·····----
ORTIZ • ········EVANS······----
COOPER) • • • • • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • ----
COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • ·----
HUTGHJSON) ·····GLOCKNER···----
ROGET) • • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ----
(MEYER) •• : •••••• GR I FF IN····----
(RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT •••••• ·----
WELLS)····•···· HOUSTON•···----
LACAYO)········ HUDSON·····----
SEITZ).'•······ ·LASZLO·····----
RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS···----
WEISHAUPT)···· ·MILLER·····--__
FINLAYSON)···· ·OLSON······--__
EVANS)·········ORTIZ······ -
SHENKMAN): ••••• PATTINSON··== ==
CUL VER) • • • • • • • ·PERRY· • • • • ·--__
NYBORG)········PRIEST·····
ANTHONY>·······RILEY······== ==
CRANK)·········RIMA·······
YOUNG) ••••••••• ROGET •••••• ----
HUMME~) • • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • == == WELSH ••••••••• SALTARELLI·
RI LEY •••••••• ·SCHMIT· • • • .----
~ROTH) •••••••••• SE~MOUR ·~··=== ==
WELSH)·········SHARP······
BAILEY)······· ·SHENKMAN··.----
SHEN~MAN) ······SIEBERT····=====
HOYTl··········SMITH······
ADLER)···•···· ·STANTON···~----
RYCKOff) ••••••• sTRAUSS· • • ·== ==
ADLER} ••••••••• svALSTAD···
ZOMMICK) ••••••• SYLVIA·····== ==
GAIDO) ••••••••• VARDOULIS··
WINTERS).··.·· -VELASQUEZ·.----
(FRIED).······· ·WEDAA· • • • • .----
(RYCKOFF) ·······WILLIAMS··.----
(VELASQUEZ)···· ·HINTERS····== ==
OTHERS
HARPER •••• -~
·SYLVESTER.·--
LEWIS ••••• ·--
CLARKE •••• ·--
BROWN •••• ··-· _ ~
WOODRUFF·-·.--·
HOHENER ••• ·--
HOWARD ••••• __
HUNT. ••••• ·---
KEITH ••••• ·--
KENNEY ••••• __
LYNCH •••••• __
MADDOX ••••• __
MARTINSON •• __
PIERSALL.~--
STEVENS •••• __
TRAVERS •••• __
\)Q)..v....~ ___Jt!!!:_
DISTRICT NO. 2 -Adjourned Regular Meet i ng
June 2 1 , 1978
7 :30 p.m.
Brea City Hall
RE: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN)
Wedaa : P l ease come to order . Gent l e men , before we can begin , we need to
appoint a Se8retary pro tern . Cou l d I h ave a motion to appoint Mr .
Fred Harper to that commiss i on . Mot i o n moved and seconded. Are
there any object i ons? Hearing none --so ordered . Could we then
have a ro ll call by Fred .
Ha r per :
Wedaa :
Har per :
Ho 1
Harper :
Harper:
Harper:
Cooper:
Harper :
Harper :
Harper :
Houston :
Harper :
Ortiz :
Harper :
Evans :
Harper
Wedaa
Here
Ho l t
Here
Clark
Ri l ey
Fox
Cooper sitti ng in for Fox
*Graham
Roget
Houston
Here
Ortiz
Here
Evans
Here
*Perry
Culver
Harper: Seymour
Ha ~r: Roth -
Harper: Smith
Harper: Hoyt
Harper: *Stanton
Harper: Adler
Harper: Velasquez
Velasquez: Here
*ARRIVED LATER -SEE FINAL ROLL CALL SHEET
Harper:
Wedaa:
Reid:
We have a quorum, Mr. Chairman
Thank you, Mr. Harper. The purpose of tonight's meeting is for
District No. 2 to conduct ~formal hearing on the Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. The
Hearing is now open. Mr. Reid would you like to update the members
of the Board and the audience relative to the current status of
the EIR and tell us something about the written comments that were
received.
Mr. Chairman, this project has been with us since July of 1976
and has underwent a lot of changes. I've attempted to summarize
them in the Manager's Report. Because of , let's say, the population
projections made by the Department of Finance based on SCAG 76, they
came up with a projection of 2,500 people. The facilities plan
estimated about a 10,000 population so the funding levels of the
project were in severe doubt. In addition, SCAG, the Executive
Committee came out and they adopted the portion of the project
from the L. A. County --excuse me --in the Orange County area
they agreed with our philosophy of sewaging the area and taking
the ponds out of the area but in the San Bernadino County, they
objected to it and they didn't go along with SCAG's region-wide
growth policy and they would like to see alternative forms of
-/ --
-
Wedaa:
Re id:
Wedda:
Conoer:
Reid:
treatment up there --either reclamation or say upgrading some of
the e xisting systems up there. At the present time, in the
Facilities Plan, the consultant recommended the alternative I ,
which was sewe ring the who le area to the Orange County Sanitation
Districts. Chino Basin Water District has expressed to us that
the cost of sewering to Orange County far outweighs the l ocal
alternative of loca l treatment and because of the other contraints
ment i oned , we feel that a t this time in the Districts best interest,
and a l __ s _o_t_h_e __ c_i_t..::y~o_f_B_r_e_a_' _s __ i...,n.;...t;;..e;;..-.r ..-e_s_.t .... ,.__t ...... o_g1...;o_w_i ... t -:-h_A_.l ... t-..;.e ....;r _n_a_t_1_· v_e'":-I_I_I...:...' _ ----which would be to --a modification of Alternative III --which
would be to sewer the Brea portion of the project and take the
pOrm s ettE of s ervi c e , construct the Carbon Canyon dam interceptor -up to the dam, amend the District 2 Master Plan to take over the
., ......
pump stat i on and leave it for Brea and the land owners or property
owners i n the area t o work out some kind of feasibility or asses§-
ment district or a way to fund the local sewers up there. In
talking to the Chino Basin .....e:__~o~p~l:..:.e~,_..;.t~h~e~y=-~h~a~v-e:.._~i~n~d~i~c~a~t.:..::..e~d;._t~h-a~t..;;_~t-h...,e;._._
county is a l ready proceeding to set up a sewer maintenance district
up there and upgrade some of the existing systems so it seems that
at all levels the pro j ect seems to be proceeding --let's say with -the local solution. If we go the local route, it no lon g er becomes -a region-wide issue and SCAG or the State or EPA no longer become
invol v ed ; but this is without the support of EPA State Funds. The
comments that we received so far have been extensive and they pretty
much favor or have suggested wha t is the District's staff 's
recommendation at this point.
That is No. 3
Yes , that is No . 3 with certain modifications . At this time after
receiving the public testimony, it wou ld be our recommendation, and
the EIR recommends the local alternative and complete the EIR and
su~mit to the State and EPA for approval and receive our Ste E_.I
monies. That concludes my report .
Thank you Dennis. All right , do any members of the Board have
any questions of staff before we take public testimony. Mr. Cooper.
I 'm just filling in at this time --when y ou say to be worked out
between the owners and Brea , could you elaborate a little more on
that.
Okay, at the present time, Brea , in a letter sent to us on June
14, 1977, notified us that they have a 10" overflow line from the
-2 -
Cooper :
Reid:
Cooper:
Wedaa:
ff; ~er:
Cooper:
Harper:
Cooper:
Harper :
Cooper:
Wedaa:
Brea ponds to the park system that's connected to the District 2
system. At this point in time, it is a technical violation --
let's say a local sewer would have to go in to take the pond
out of service; but before that could happen the area would
have to annex, or a monthly user charge would have to be lev ied.
Now, that would be attributed to who now? The n ew people, the old
people or the new and old?
It would be attributed to those who are connected to the system.
Since it's a Brea line that was connected, I belieya ~that ~it ~~
would be the responsibility of Brea.
What I'm trying to find out is that if we have 500 homes up in
plus a mobile home park and you want to work the
sewer in and the people who want to build in that area, who is
ultimately responsible to pay for the cost of putting that in --
the new people the old people ..... .
Mr. Harper , would you respond?
Mr. Chairman, it would be the property owners in the area because
they must annex to the Sanitation District.
Okay, then that would be outside --you say annex ...
Well, i t 's a ll --nothing behind the darn is in District 2.
No, but what I'm trying to determine , in order to put t his sewer
line in --1 2t 's clarify this because there's lots of people here
who own some of the propery --if the sewer line is put in, who
ultimately has to pay for that sewer line --the new people coming
in or the old people _or the combination of?
I would say the combination of because they will a ll benefit from it.
Okay, thanks, that's what I wanted to determine.
Now, are there a n y furthe r questions of staff by any members of the
Board? All right, l et 's move on to the next phase of this hearing
which is the consideration of any public hearings --or oral comments
by members of the public who might like to speak on the subject. Is
there any member of the aad ience that would like to say something
on this subject? Would you come forward please and identify yourself
for the record, with your name and address.
White:
Wedaa:
White:
Reid :
White:
Wedaa:
Keith:
Wedaa:
My name is Ron White, 4061 Germander, Irvine , California and our
company Her itage Development has title to a substantial land
in the Carbon Canyon Area and we are interested in, I believe, the
solution mentioned on the last page of this brochure here to solve
the problem at the local level , next to the last paragraph. And
I'm not sure if I understand what Dennis ment by the Alternate III as
being recommended.
Is there a specific problem, or would like us to explain it all
over again or we'll do either one?
I don't want to take up a lot of time but Al t ernate III is upgrading
the existing treatment and disposal system --what does that mean?
Let me clarify, it involves some modification but it involves exactl y
what was stated here on the back --sewering the portion i n
Orange County and leaving the area upstream in the County alone to
either consider reclamation or status quo. The recommendation number
III, Alternative III, is--actually it's the recommendation to funded
by local monies. As far as this project being sent to the State
we would not receive any funding so it may go to the State in the
form of no project. Do you understand that?
Yes, we are interested in seeing a sewer assessment District formed
from this local level approach. Okay! Thank you .
Thank you. Are there further comments f rom the audience on this
subject?
Milo Ke ith, Keith & Associates in Santa Ana . I represent the City
of Brea as a city engineer tonight. We have followed this problem
of the Carbon Canyon area with the staff of the District and we are
representative on the Sanitation District's staff and if the
Directors need any clarification on the planning of the city for
this area, I would be glad to answer them.
All right, since we apparently have no further comments at the moment
from any members of the audience, do any members of the Board have
any questions to the city engineer concerning this issue? Okay,
before I close the public hearing, is there anyone else who would
like to speak on the matter? The Hearing is closed. All right
let's move on to item 3, which is consideration the motion directing
staff and consulting engineer to prepare Final Environmental Impact
Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities P lan. Could I have a motion?
I have a motion and seconded. Are there any objections to the motion?
Harper:
Wedaa:
Harper:
Wedaa:
Harper:
We r' "i :
Harpe r:
Holt:
Harpe r:
Coop e r:
Harper :
Graham:
Harpe r:
Houston:
Harper:
Ortiz
Harpe r:
Evans
Harper:
Perry:
Harper:
Velasquez:
We --~:
Harper:
We d aa :
Mr. Chairman, there is one item which I would like to include in
the proceedings and that is to receive and file a listing of the
actions to date relative to the Environm ental Impact Report for the
Carbon Canyon Faclities P l an. It has to do with actions that the
Board has taken since July 14, 1976. It 's just a listing of the
actions.
Okay , could I have a motion to put it on the agenda as say 2F?
Is that satisfactory?
Yes
All right a motion and seconded. Any objections to adding that item
to the agenda? Could I have a motion to accept it? Motion and
seconded . Any objections to acceptance? Appearing none, motion
carried unanimously. Moving on to item number 3 , the Final EIR
could I have a motion . .sorry. .Are there any objections
to the motion on item number 3. Hearing none the motion passes
unanimously. Let 's move to item number 4 --let 's have a motion
considering resolution No. 78-123-2. A motion and seconded. Could
I have --let's have a roll call vote , Mr. Harper .
Yes , Mr . Chairman . Wedaa
Ye s
Holt
Yes
Clark , Riley , Cooper
Yes
Graham
Yes
Houston
Yest
Ortiz
Yes
Evans
Yes
Perry
Yes
Seymour, Roth, Smith , Hoyt, Stanton , Ad l er , Velasquez
Yes
All right, the motion passes unanimously . Item No. 5 , Mr. Harper
is there any other business or communication?
We have none, Mr. Chairman
Me mb e rs of the Board , are there any other x ~x Exx ~~~x ~~~ busine ss
ite ms or communications for the Board to conside r tonight? Hearing
r -
none, let's move to item 6 --motion to adjourn --seconded,· any .... /
objections? The meeting is adjourned. ( __. ')
-{;-