Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-06-21 OCRCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 15, 1978 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 2 WEDNESDAY; JUNE 21) 1978 -7:30 P.M. BREA CITY HALL 401 S. BREA BOULEVARD BREAJ CALIFORNIA (SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE) Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of June 14, 1978, the Board TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The purpose of this meeting is for an informal public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. JWS:rb N ~ w (.!) z <( a:: 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R!VF.:RSIDE FRWY @ DI ST. 2 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEET I NG ~-~~~--~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~ WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 1978, 7:30 P.M. I AT BREA c ITV HALL --....,-........ ------ II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Col.mty Sanitation Districts of Orange Cou~ty, California DISTRICT No. 2 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING JUNE 21J 1978 -7:30 P.M. (1) Roll call Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (2) Consideration of actions re la ti ve to informal hearing on. Draft Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: (a) Open hearing (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments relative·to the Draft· Environmental .impact Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders) (c) Consideration of oral comments, if any (d) General discussion and staff comments (e) Close hearing (3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting engineer to prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving amendment to agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00 (5) Other business and communications, if any (6) Consideration of motion to adj~urn to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978 II BOARDS OF DIREC1'0RS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT Noo 2 ADJOURNED ·REGULAR MEETING JUNE 21~ 1978 -7:30 P.M. (1) Roll call (la) Appointment of Fred A. Harper as Secretary pro tern Post Office Box 8127 1 Q844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURNMENTS POSTED.~ COMP & MILEAGE •.•.• ~. FILES SET UP ...... \r:::: ......... . RESOLUTIONS CERTIFIED.!=""' LETTERS WRITTEN ... L,"_ MINIJTES WRITTEN ... k.::';:._ MINUTES MLED ...... k.':::'. ..... (2) Consideration of actionsrelative to informal hearing on Draft FILE ---·-·· ... Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: LETTER ... _ ........ . A/C __ TKLR ... . (a) Open hearing (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file wri~ten comments relative to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (See complete listing in Directors' meeting folders) (c) Consideration of oral coJtDUents, if any (d) General discussion and staff connnents fl LE ....... -.. -···- LEA/lTCER~KLR ..... ; .. ~ (e) Close hearing ~ (_~) \\.~~ ~'6~~~ . ____ (3) Consideration of motion directing staff and consul ting engineer to f\/\.\ ~ prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities ____ ,., Plan (4) M\~ Roll Call Vote or Cast fl LE . .UnanlmV' Ballot ~ ............. . ~~(S) (6) . ~~-I Consideration of Resolution No. 78-123-2, approving ameaemeat to agreement with ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000.00 Other business and conununications, if any Consideration of motion to adjourn to 6 :00 p.m_, June 22, 1978 f'/;55 f ) I ! ~AGENDA ITEM #2 (b) Jri ~ten comments rece ived r e lative to Draft Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities P l a n: Agency City of Brea State of Cali fo rnia, State Water Resources Contro l Board, Di v ision of Water Qu a lity State of Ca liforn i a , State Water Reso urc es Control Board, Di vis ion of Water Quality City o f Brea City of God, Saint Jos eph's Hill of Hope Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority County of Ora n ge , Environmental Management Ag e ncy, Advance P l anning Div ision Don McBride Com pany State of Ca lifornia , S tate Water Resourc es Contro l Board , Division of Water Qua lity County of S a n Bernardino , En v ironmenta l I mprovemen t Agency South ern Californi a Assoc iation o f Governments State of California , Depa rtme nt of Parks and Recreation State of California , Depa rtment of Fish and Game State of Cali fo rni a , Sta te Water Resourc es Contro l Board, Division of Water Qua lity State of Ca li f o r nia , Department of Transpor tation Dated 7/07/77 7/0 8/77 8/04/77 10/14/77 1/09/78 1/09/7 8 1 /12/78 1/26/78 1 /3 0/7 8 2/15/78 3/08/78 4/20/78 4/27/78 4/27/7 8 4/28/78 * 7/14/76 '...,.,; * 7/14/76 * 7/14/76 *10/13/76 * 9/14/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 10/26/77 * 1/11/78 1/24/78 * 2/08/78 * 4/12/78 6/21/78 ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of (Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area ( (Approved participatfon in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage (service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area ( (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility (Report and Environmental Impact Report Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meetipg to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Faci Ii ties Plan (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan ( (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan ( (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, (as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR ( (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing (on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed (facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future (meeting Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date to February ~8, 1978 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 * 5/10/78 '-" Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published in The Register *Board Actions I u RESOLUTION NO. 78 -12 3 -2 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH ECOS MANAGEMENT CR ITERIA RE PREPARATION OF FINA L ENVIRONMENTA L IMPACT REPORT ON CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN A RESOLUT I ON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SAN I TATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA , APPROV I NG AMENDMENT NO . 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH ECOS MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR PREPARATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IM PACT REPORT ON THE CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Co unty Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE , DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Ame nd ment No. 1 dated to that certain Agreement dated October 13, 1976, by and between County Sanitation District No . 2 of Orange County and ECOS Management Criteria, authori zing preparation of the Fin al Environmental Impa ct Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2 . Tha t payment for said work will be on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $2,000 .00; and, Section 3 . Th a t the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute said Amendment No. 1 in form approved b y the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at an a djourned re5J l a r meeting he ld June 21, 1978 . June 1 5, 1978 MANAGER'S REPORT CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN AND DRAFT EIR COUN TY SANITATION DI STRI CTS ol OR ANGE CO UNTY. C ALIF ORNIA P.O .BOX 8127 10844 EL LI S AVENU E FOUNTAIN VAL LEY. CALI FORNIA 92 708 (714) 540-2910 (714)96 2-24 11 Th e Carbon Canyon drainage area was identified in the Re g iona l Water Qu a lity Cont ro l Board 1 s (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that was exper i encing problems with the existing sewe r age dispo sa l systems and did n ot me e t the water quality objectives for the San ta Ana River Basin. The area was p l ace d by the RWQCB on the Gr a nt Funded Proje ct li st and on August 11, 1 976 , Sanitation Distric t No . 2 filed a grant app li cation with the State and Environmental Protect ion Agency and entered into a j oint agreement , as l ead agency, with th e City of Br ea a nd Chino Basin Munic ip a l Water District. The Facilities Pl an Report inves tigates the feasibility of sewerage service for the Carbon Canyon a rea, and the Environmental Impa ct Report the resultant impacts . Four a l ternatives are discusse d, with No . 1 being the r e c ommende d altern a tive by the F ac ilities P l an con - sultant. 1 . Sewe ring to County Sanitat ion District No . 2 of Or ange Coun t y sy stem -$3.l millio n 2. Construc tion of l oca l treatment plants -$3.4 million 3. Upgrade existing treatment and disposa l systems - $1 .1 mill ion 4. No project Th e RWQCB h as do cumented that the pre sent sewage systems and their operation are defi c i e nt in na ture and genera lly recogni zed as a t emporary so lution until the problem of tota l waste disposal is solved in the study area. The consul tant recornme n8ati on includes serving an a rea in the .City of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and a n area in San Bernardino County . The District No. 2 adop t ed Master Plan at this point has no prov ision for serving the area outside the county line and it wo ul d r equire complete Board action to do such. Since the project h as b een out for public review, a num ber of important facto rs n ow make the most f easibl e Al ternative No. 3 . The f actor s are : 1. Th e SWRCB found insuffi cient justi fic a tion for the l ower reach es of thf:! project b elow Ca r bon Canyon Dam to serve the existing p opulat ion a nd found it growth-in ducing . 2. The SCAG Executive Committee rules that the upper p ort ion of the projccL (S an Bernardino County) was in consis t ent with r egiona l grow th for ecas t policies . 3. The project f un ding eligibil ity b ased on E-0 popu- l nt.ion forecast was estima ted to be 2500 p eop le. Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are ab out 10 ,000 people . If Slate and Federa l funding were rec eived, there would be severe growth restr ictions. It i s the staff 's reconm1e nd a tion at this time to conclude the public h ear ing process on the EIR an d have th e Dis tricts ' EIR consultant fin a lize the EIR . (This will require an amendment to the contract bec ause of the ch anged recommended alternat i ve r equires add i tiona l work). The Faci l ities Plan and EI R wi l l be submitted to the EPA and SWRCB for the District to r eceive full payment for the St·ep I work . To so l ve the problem a t th e local leve l, it is recommen d e d that Sanitation District No . 2 build the Carbon Ca nyon Darn Int ercep tor to the Dam and am end th e Master Plan to t ake o ver th e pump station ab o ve th e Dam and b uild a new on e . Brea would reta in the park sewer syst~m and bui ld a 10 11 or 1 2" line to conn ec t the p o n ds and take tb e m out of service . At present, Brea hc:.s connection from the ponds via a 4 " l ine to the park system to handle overflows . A monthly fee will h ave to be l evied aga inst the h omeowners for sewe r service, or a contract e nt ered into with the City, o r the area must annex (which would c ost about $140,000). Brea charges no specia l assessments or fees f or op eration of the ponds. The District can proceed a nd build its amended Naster P l an facilities now . Befor e Brea builds its link from the Park to the ponds it must a nn ex those areas that the ponds serve. Estimate d cost~ to Brea for annexat ion a nd construc tion a r e about $400 ,000. B~e a will h ave to re s olve th is cost issue with itself a nd the h omeow ners . Fr e d A . Harper Gene r a l Mana ge r June 15, 1978 MANAGER'S REPORT CARBON CANYON FACI LITIES PLAN AND DRAFT EIR COUN TY SANITATIO N DI STRIC TS or 0 RA NG E C OUNTY . c ALIFORNIA P.0 .BO X 6 127 10644 EL LI S AVE'NU[ FO UNTAIN VALLEY. CALif011NIA 92706 (714) 540-2910 (714)962·24 11 Th e Carbon Canyon draina ge a rea was ide ntifi e d in the Reg ional Water Qu a li ty Contro l Board's (RWQ CB) Basin Pl a n as a n area tha t was experiencin g p rob l ems with the existing sewerage dis posal systems a nd d id not meet th e water qua li ty object i ves fo r the Santa Ana River Ba sin. The a r ea was placed by the RWQCB on the Gr a nt Funded Project list and on Augu s t 11, 1976 , Sanit ation District No . 2 filed a grant app li cation with the Sta te and Environme ntal Prote ction Age n cy a n d entered into a joint a gre em e nt, as l ea d agency, with th e City of Br ea and Chino Basin Municipa l Water District. Th e Fac i li ties P l an Report investiga t es the feasib i lity of s ewerage service for the Carbon Ca n yon area, and the Env ironmen tal Impact Report th e result an t i mpacts. Four alternativ es a r e di s cussed, with No. 1 being the re c ommended a lternative by the Facilities P l a n con - sultant. 1. Sewe ring t o County Sa nitation Distr ict No. 2 of Or a n ge County system -$3.l million 2 . Construc t i on of l oca l t reatment plants -$3.4 million 3. Upgrade ex isting treatment a nd disposal systems - $1. 1 mill ion ( ' l / 4 . No pro j ect The RWQCB has do cument ed tha t th e present sewage s ys t e ms a nd their op era tion a re deficien t in n a ture and gen e r a lly reco gni ze d as a t emporary so lution until th e problem of t ota l waste disposa l is solve d i n the study a rea . The con su l tan t recomme nda tion i nc ludes servin g a n a r ea in the City o f Br ea which i s outside District No . 2 a nd an a rea in San Bernardino County . Th e Di strict No. 2 a dopt ed Master Plan at thi s point h as no prov ision for s erving the area outside the coun ty line and it wou l d r equire complete Boar d act i on to do such. Since the proj ect hn s been out for pub li c review, a numb er of importan t factors n ow make the most feas i b l e Alt e rnative No . 3 . The facto rs are: 1 . Th e SWRCB fo u nd i n suffi ci ent j us t ificat i o n f o r t h e l ower r eac h es of t h e proj ect b e low Carb on Canyo n Dam to serve th e existin g p op ul a tion and fo un d it g r ow th -inducin g . 2 . The SCAG Execu t i ve Comm i ttee ru l es t h at the u ppe r p o r tion o f t h e project (Sn n Bern ardino County ) was i n con s i s t e nt wi t h regiona l g rowth f or e c ast p o licies . 3 . Th e p roject f u nding eligibility base d on E -0 popu - l at i on foreca st was estimated t o be 2500 people . Actua l estimates for the Fac i lities P lan are about 1 0 ,000 people . I f State and FederaJ funding were r e c e i ved, there wo u ld be severe g r owth restr i ction s . I t is the staff 's recomme ndation at this time to conc l ude the pub lic hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts ' EIR consultant finalize the EIR . (This will require an amendment to the c-ontract b ecau se of the c h anged recomme nded a l tern at i ve req u ires additiona l work) . The Faci l ities P l an and EIR wi ll be s u bmitted to the EPA and SWRCB for t he Distr i ct to receive ful l payment for the Step I wo r k . To so l ve the prob l em at t h e l oca l l eve l, i t i s recommended t h at Sa ni tation Di stric t No . 2 b uild t h e Carb on Canyon Dam I ntercepto r to th e Dam and amen d the Master Plan to take over th2 pmop station above th e Dam and build a new one . Brea would retain the p:irk sewer systein and build a 10" or 12 " l i ne to connect t h e ponds an d take them out of service. At present , Brea has connection from the ponds via a 4 " line t o the park system to handl e overflows . A monthly fee will have to b e l evied against the homeowners for sewer service , or a contract e n tered into with the City , or t h e area must annex (which would c9st about $140,000). Brea c h arges no spe c ial assessments or fees fo r operation of the ponds . Th e Di strict can proceed and bui l d its amended Mas t er Plan fac i l i ties n ow . Befor e Brea bui l ds its link from t h e Park to tl ~e ponds i t mus t ann ex those areas that the ponds serve . E st imat~d cost~ to Brea f or annexation and constr uction are a b out $400,000 . Brea wil l h ave t o r esolve this cos t· issue with itse l f and the h omeowners . Fr e d A. Ha r per GenerCJ.l Manager 15, 1978 CARBON CAN N FACILITIE a _ l ( r1 ·-l ( AND FT EIR COUNTY SANITAT ION DISTRICTS ol 0 RANGE CO UN TY . C l\LIFORN IA P.O .BOX 8 127 10844 ELLIS AVE NU[ FOUNT A VALLEY . CALI FOnN IA 92708 ~~~<_>-~910 (714~ ~ ~~ ~"'< c:,,J'vr ~ )GVt:~J The Carbon Canyon drainage a rea was identified in the Regional Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) Basin Plan as an area that was experiencing problems with the existing sewerage disposal systems and did not meet the water quality objectives for the Santa. Ana River Bas ~.!:;.i. (h <j.rfr a was placed -1.1y tee R1fQGB-on the Grant Funded Project lis ftA a~d ~Atl~ust 11, 19 6, S~tj.it ~tion District No. 2 filed a grant app icati ' wi e ~~ and iE'"n;Ironmental Protection Agency ~nd entered into a joint agreemen~/~as lead agency, with the City f Brea and Chino Basin Munici_pa ~~e~t1r~t ~ ~;(I<.) The Facilities Plan Report investigates the feasibility of sewerage service for the Carbon Canyon area, and the Environmental I mpact Report the resultant impacts . Four alternatives· are discussed, with No. 1 being the recommended alternative by the Facilities Plan con- sultant. 1. 2. Sewering to County Sanitation District of Orange County system -$3.1 million Construction of l ~cal treatment plants million ~J ~ . ¥7:.I J . -$3.4 3. _Up grad~ e~istin,.g t~eatT ent and disposal systems - $1.1 million fk'(I' '~'Z1 ·-:J tnt§j-y1 ec,.:t , 4. No project The RWQCB has documented that the present sewage systems and their operation are deficient in nature and generally recogni z ed as a temporary solution until the problem of total waste disposal is solved in the study area. The consultan ~~recommendation includes serving an a rea in the City of Brea which is outside District No. 2 and an area in San Bernardino County. The District No. 2 adopted Master Pl?n at this point has no provision for serving the area outside the county line and it would require ~Board action to do such. Since the project has been out for public review, a number of important factors now make ~t t!""mos t fcseitrl'eo Alternative No. 3 V The factors are: Jt~&~· 1. The SWRCB found insufficient justification for the lower reaches of the project below Carbon Canyon . Dam to serve the existing population and ~, it · . Ii growth-inducing. J.. c,.....-~..f 2. The SCAG E~ecutive Co~ittee ;ule} that the upper portion of the proje~t (San Bernardino County) was inconsistent with regional growth forecast policies. 3 . The project .funding eligibility based on E-0 popu- lation forecast was estimated to be 2..,5 00 people. Actual estimates for the Facilities Plan are about 10,000 people. If State and Federal fundin g were received, there would be severe growth restrictions. It is the staff's. recommendation 'at this time to conclude .the public .hearing process on the EIR and have the Districts'.~ consultant fina~ize the EIR. (T l.ll-~will require .an amen dJJii ent to the contract . because o r efi e @ flfifig ~~:re corrirnended ·alternative~t'g_~es -additional work). The Facilities Plan and EIR ~l be submitted to the EPA _ and SWR~B for the District to re~e~ve full · p ~~} ~the Step Ir~· To solve the problem at the local .level, it is recommended that Sanitation District No. 2 build the Carbon .Canyon Dam Interceptor to the Dam and ·amend the Master Plan to take over the p ~p station above the Dam and build a new one. Brea would retain the park sewer system and build a 1611 or 12•' line to connect the ponds and take them out of service. At present, Brea h as ... connection . from the ponds via a "'1:!::-line to the .park system to handle overflows. A· monthly fee wil l have to be lev ied against the homeovmers for sewer service, or a contract entered into with the City, or the area must.annex (which would c9st ~~~r;~o ~~o !~ ~1t.:;~\ . c ~.t s i:c t:2lt ri£~L ~-!1" A~ ~ . ~ Q.,N:O: ,.;._ Irv,..,.~. (Jh. . The Distric'l::,,can proceed an bui Pdits amende Master Plan f a cilities now. Before Brea builds its ·link from the l'ark to the ponds it must annex those areas that the pon g s serve. Est imate·d co.st/ to Brea for . annexation . and con~tructic;>n ~-ins t $400, 000. ~rea wil J t;1w -~o -.. re 'S-Ql m;~ t h i s s est.,.:..j,s sue w-1:-t::h its.e l L an d t b e-h@me®WR.oeTS . .. "" ~ ~ .N ~ ~c.r..J~ wJL 4l... ~~ . * 7/14/76 'W * 7/14/76 * 7/14/76 *10/13/76 * 9/14/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 10/26/77 * 1/11/78 1/24/78 * 2/08/78 * 4/12/78 4/24/78 5/08/78 * 5/10/78 ~ 5/15/78 6/21/78 ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of (Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area ( (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage (service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area ( (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility (Report and Environmental Impact Report Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan ( (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan ( (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, (as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR ( (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing (on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed (facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future (meeting Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 Advised appropriate agencies and interested-parties of extension of comment date to February 28, 1978 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published in The Register *Board Actions '~ RE: AGENDA ITEM #2(b) Written comments received relative to Draft Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan: Agency City of Brea State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality City of Brea City of God, Saint Joseph's Hill of Hope Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority County of Orange, Environmental Management Agency, Advance Planning Division Don McBride Company State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality County of San Bernardino, Environmental Improvement Agency Southern California Association of Governments State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation State of California, Department of Fish and Game State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality State of California, Department-of Transportation Dated 7/07/77 7/08/77 8/04/77 10/14/77 1/09/78 1/09/78 1/12/78 1/26/78 1/30/78 2/15/78 3/08/78 4/20/78 4/27/78 4/27/78 4/28/78 * 7/14/76 ~ * 7/14/76 * 7/14/76 *10/13/76 * 9/14/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 *10/19/77 10/26/77 * 1/11/78 1/24/78 * 2/08/78 * 4/12/78 6/21/78 ACTIONS TO DATE RE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN (Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City of (Brea re sewerage service for Sleep Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area ( (Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage (service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area ( (Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility (Report and Environmental Impact Report Adopted Resolution No. 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Manageement Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (Discussed alternative for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan ( (Receive & filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan ( (Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, (as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR ( (Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing (on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed (facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future (meeting Copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan mailed to appropriate agencies and interested parties Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 Advised appropriate agencies and interested parties of extension of comment date to February 28, 1978 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978 Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall 4/24/78 Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties 5/08/78 * 5/10/78 ~ Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties. Also advised the date for receipt of comments on Draft EIR will be extended to June 9, 1978 Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 5/15/78 Notice of Public Hearing to be held June 21, 1978, at Brea City Hall published in The Register *Board Actions 1/24/78 PHONES: (714) S40-2910 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER 962-2411 DI RECTOR OF FINANCE AND SECRETARY TO THE BOARDS OF DI RECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNiA 92708 Advised persons on mailing list of extension of comment date from from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978 (Never did advise re extension of comment date from February 28 to March 30.) In letter to State Clearing House on 5/8/78, advised of time extension to June 9, 1978. Referred to original comment date of January 16, 1978, only. 7/14/76 7/14/76 7/14/76 10/13/76 9/14/77 10/19/77 10/19/77 10/19/77 10/19/77 1/11/78 i / z c..f 2/08/78 4/12/78 1..fl2 y s /'(? 5/10/78 6/15/78 BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District & City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage service for Sle:py Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility Report and EIR Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must be received on EIR Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future meeting Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978. Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978. Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall . Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 10/26/77 4/24/78 5/08/78 . 5/15/78 Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978 Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register 7/14/76 7/14/76 7/14/76 10/13/76 9/14/77 10/19/77 10/19/77 10/19/77 10/19/77 1/11/78 2/08/78 4/12/78 5/10/78 6/15/78 BOARD ACTIONS RE EIR FOR CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN Received & filed letters from Chino Basin Municipal Water District & City of Brea re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Approved participation in Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Authorized General Manager to solicit proposals for preparation of Feasibility Report and EIR Adopted Resolution 76-188-2 approving award of contract to ECOS Management Criteria for preparation of EIR re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area Declared intent to adjourn from October 12, 1977, meeting to an adjourned meeting on October 19, 1977, to consider actions relative to EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan Discussed alternatives for Carbon Canyon set forth in Facilities Plan Received and filed Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan Authorized staff to file Notice of Intent re EIR and established January 16, 1978, as the final date for which all comments must be received on EIR Recommended delaying consideration of fixing time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR; and directed staff to prepare financial plan for financing proposed facilities to serve Carbon Canyon area, to be considered by Board at a future meeting Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be recieved on Draft EIR from January 16, 1978, to February 28, 1978. Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from February 28, 1978, to March 30, 1978. Fixed time and place for public hearing on Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan as 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall Authorized extension of date for which all comments must be received on Draft EIR from March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 10/26/77 4/24/78 5/08/78 5/15/78 Mailed copies of Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan to appropriate agencies and interested parties Mailed notice of public hearing on June 21, 1978, to appropriate agencies and interested parties Forwarded copy of Notice of Preparation to State Clearinghouse and to all appropriate agencies and interested parties; and advised that the date for all comments must be received had been extended to June 9,1978 Published Notice of Public Hearing in The Register JUNE l ~J lg78 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT ON THE MEETING OF THE WEST COAST DISCHARGERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SEATTLE JUNE 7TH, ALSO, YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON THE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN .. . . PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS' FOLDERS UNDER THIS ITEM .RE SENATOR CRANSTON. ANNOUNCE THAT NO MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS BEING PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE. EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 , of Orange County, California , was held on June 21 19 78 , at Brea City Hall, 401 S . Brea Boulevard, Brea, Ca l ifornia. The Ch airman ca ll ed the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.. The rol l was ca lled and a quorum of the Boa rd was reported present. Directors present: Directors absent: Present: Adjournment Directors Henry Wed aa, Chairman, Donald Holt, Sam Cooper, Beth Graham, Bernard Houston, Vern Evans, David Ortiz, Bob Perry, Roger Stanton and Loui s Velasquez Directors Ralph Clark, John Seymour a n d Don Smith Fred A.-Harper, Secretary pro tern * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Bo ard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7 :55 p .m., June 21, 1978. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SY LVESTER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.2 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute e n tries on record taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 , of Orange County , Ca lifornia, on the 21st day of June , 1978 IN WI TNESS \\'HEREOF, I have hereunto seal of County Sani t ation District No. 2 19 78 S-110 MEETING DATE June 21, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS -=-2 _____ _ DISTRICT 1 ~CRANK) ••••• , •• RIMA ••••••• ·--_. _ WELSH) •••••••• SHARP •••••• ·----__ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ·----__ ORTIZ) •••••••• EVANS •••••• ·----__ DISTRICT 2 ~q FRI ED).·.~·.· .WEDAA • • ... • • -~ .:{__ --. RASHFORD) ••••• HOLT •••••••• .-IL .;:L_ __ RILEY) •••••••• CLARK ••• ···-~~ -- COOPER) • • • • • • -~ • • • • • • • • v' _z__ --ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM •••••• V _:f__ __ .WELLS) •• · •••••• HOUSTON.·. • -~ ~ -- EVANS)······· -ORTIZ······-~ Ji__ --CULV~R) ••••••• PERRY ••• •••• V _l:_ __ ROTH ••• .' ••• ·.SEYMOUR····-~ _a.._ __ HOYT •• • • • • • • ·SM ITH· • • • • • ·~ t --ADLER) •••••••• STANTON.····~ __ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ···~ -· _ DISTRICT 3 . (ADLER).·.~ ••••• SVALSTAD • • • ·--___ _ (MEYER) •••••• • -GRIFFIN·····--___ _ lPERRY) ......... CULVER.·····--___ _ (COOP.ER) ••••••• GAMBINA • • • • ·--___ _ LACAYO) ~ • • • • • • HUpSON • • • • • ·----__ SEITZ) •• ~····· LASZLO······------ WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER •••• ··--___ _ FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON······· EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ· •• ·.·.------ NYBORG) • ~ ••••• PR I EST •• • • • .------ YOUNG) •••••••• ROG ET ••••••• ~==== RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT •••••• Roni>.~•.• ..•.•. SEYMOUR ••••• -== == SHENKMAN),.; •••• SIEBERT •••• ·--___ _ ZOMMICK) •••••• SYLVIA •••••• VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS·····-== == DISTRICT 5 ~l-fUMMEL) • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------ ANTHONY) ······RI LEY· • • • • • ·----·-- RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ·------ ·DISTRICT 6 (RYCKOfF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• _____ _ (CRANK) •••••••• RIMA ••• ~ •••• (RiLEY) · •••••••• ANTHONY •••• === == == DISTRICT 7 (GAIDO) ••• • • • • ·VARDOUL·I·s. • -----~HOYT).··.···· .SMITH·······--___ _ RILEY)······· -CLARK·······--___ _ ORTI z) • · • · .. · · ·EVANS· • • • • • ·--___ _ (HUTCHISON).· •• GLOCKNER.···--___ _ {WELSH) •••• •• •• SALTARELLI··--___ _ (RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS····------ DISTRICT 11 BAILEY ••••••• -SHENKMAN.... • SHENKMAN) ••••• PATTINSON ••• ------ RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT······ · ==== S/14/73 JOINT BOARDS RILEY ·········ANTHONY····---- RILEY • ········CLARK······---- PERRY • ···.-~.··CULVER·····---- ORTIZ • ········EVANS······---- COOPER) • • • • • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • ---- COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • ·---- HUTGHJSON) ·····GLOCKNER···---- ROGET) • • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • • ---- (MEYER) •• : •••••• GR I FF IN····---- (RASHFORD) •••••• HOLT •••••• ·---- WELLS)····•···· HOUSTON•···---- LACAYO)········ HUDSON·····---- SEITZ).'•······ ·LASZLO·····---- RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS···---- WEISHAUPT)···· ·MILLER·····--__ FINLAYSON)···· ·OLSON······--__ EVANS)·········ORTIZ······ - SHENKMAN): ••••• PATTINSON··== == CUL VER) • • • • • • • ·PERRY· • • • • ·--__ NYBORG)········PRIEST····· ANTHONY>·······RILEY······== == CRANK)·········RIMA······· YOUNG) ••••••••• ROGET •••••• ---- HUMME~) • • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • == == WELSH ••••••••• SALTARELLI· RI LEY •••••••• ·SCHMIT· • • • .---- ~ROTH) •••••••••• SE~MOUR ·~··=== == WELSH)·········SHARP······ BAILEY)······· ·SHENKMAN··.---- SHEN~MAN) ······SIEBERT····===== HOYTl··········SMITH······ ADLER)···•···· ·STANTON···~---- RYCKOff) ••••••• sTRAUSS· • • ·== == ADLER} ••••••••• svALSTAD··· ZOMMICK) ••••••• SYLVIA·····== == GAIDO) ••••••••• VARDOULIS·· WINTERS).··.·· -VELASQUEZ·.---- (FRIED).······· ·WEDAA· • • • • .---- (RYCKOFF) ·······WILLIAMS··.---- (VELASQUEZ)···· ·HINTERS····== == OTHERS HARPER •••• -~ ·SYLVESTER.·-- LEWIS ••••• ·-- CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN •••• ··-· _ ~ WOODRUFF·-·.--· HOHENER ••• ·-- HOWARD ••••• __ HUNT. ••••• ·--- KEITH ••••• ·-- KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••••• __ MADDOX ••••• __ MARTINSON •• __ PIERSALL.~--­ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ \)Q)..v....~ ___Jt!!!:_ DISTRICT NO. 2 -Adjourned Regular Meet i ng June 2 1 , 1978 7 :30 p.m. Brea City Hall RE: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CARBON CANYON FACILITIES PLAN) Wedaa : P l ease come to order . Gent l e men , before we can begin , we need to appoint a Se8retary pro tern . Cou l d I h ave a motion to appoint Mr . Fred Harper to that commiss i on . Mot i o n moved and seconded. Are there any object i ons? Hearing none --so ordered . Could we then have a ro ll call by Fred . Ha r per : Wedaa : Har per : Ho 1 Harper : Harper: Harper: Cooper: Harper : Harper : Harper : Houston : Harper : Ortiz : Harper : Evans : Harper Wedaa Here Ho l t Here Clark Ri l ey Fox Cooper sitti ng in for Fox *Graham Roget Houston Here Ortiz Here Evans Here *Perry Culver Harper: Seymour Ha ~r: Roth - Harper: Smith Harper: Hoyt Harper: *Stanton Harper: Adler Harper: Velasquez Velasquez: Here *ARRIVED LATER -SEE FINAL ROLL CALL SHEET Harper: Wedaa: Reid: We have a quorum, Mr. Chairman Thank you, Mr. Harper. The purpose of tonight's meeting is for District No. 2 to conduct ~formal hearing on the Draft Environ- mental Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan. The Hearing is now open. Mr. Reid would you like to update the members of the Board and the audience relative to the current status of the EIR and tell us something about the written comments that were received. Mr. Chairman, this project has been with us since July of 1976 and has underwent a lot of changes. I've attempted to summarize them in the Manager's Report. Because of , let's say, the population projections made by the Department of Finance based on SCAG 76, they came up with a projection of 2,500 people. The facilities plan estimated about a 10,000 population so the funding levels of the project were in severe doubt. In addition, SCAG, the Executive Committee came out and they adopted the portion of the project from the L. A. County --excuse me --in the Orange County area they agreed with our philosophy of sewaging the area and taking the ponds out of the area but in the San Bernadino County, they objected to it and they didn't go along with SCAG's region-wide growth policy and they would like to see alternative forms of -/ -- - Wedaa: Re id: Wedda: Conoer: Reid: treatment up there --either reclamation or say upgrading some of the e xisting systems up there. At the present time, in the Facilities Plan, the consultant recommended the alternative I , which was sewe ring the who le area to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Chino Basin Water District has expressed to us that the cost of sewering to Orange County far outweighs the l ocal alternative of loca l treatment and because of the other contraints ment i oned , we feel that a t this time in the Districts best interest, and a l __ s _o_t_h_e __ c_i_t..::y~o_f_B_r_e_a_' _s __ i...,n.;...t;;..e;;..-.r ..-e_s_.t .... ,.__t ...... o_g1...;o_w_i ... t -:-h_A_.l ... t-..;.e ....;r _n_a_t_1_· v_e'":-I_I_I...:...' _ ----which would be to --a modification of Alternative III --which would be to sewer the Brea portion of the project and take the pOrm s ettE of s ervi c e , construct the Carbon Canyon dam interceptor -up to the dam, amend the District 2 Master Plan to take over the ., ...... pump stat i on and leave it for Brea and the land owners or property owners i n the area t o work out some kind of feasibility or asses§- ment district or a way to fund the local sewers up there. In talking to the Chino Basin .....e:__~o~p~l:..:.e~,_..;.t~h~e~y=-~h~a~v-e:.._~i~n~d~i~c~a~t.:..::..e~d;._t~h-a~t..;;_~t-h...,e;._._ county is a l ready proceeding to set up a sewer maintenance district up there and upgrade some of the existing systems so it seems that at all levels the pro j ect seems to be proceeding --let's say with -the local solution. If we go the local route, it no lon g er becomes -a region-wide issue and SCAG or the State or EPA no longer become invol v ed ; but this is without the support of EPA State Funds. The comments that we received so far have been extensive and they pretty much favor or have suggested wha t is the District's staff 's recommendation at this point. That is No. 3 Yes , that is No . 3 with certain modifications . At this time after receiving the public testimony, it wou ld be our recommendation, and the EIR recommends the local alternative and complete the EIR and su~mit to the State and EPA for approval and receive our Ste E_.I monies. That concludes my report . Thank you Dennis. All right , do any members of the Board have any questions of staff before we take public testimony. Mr. Cooper. I 'm just filling in at this time --when y ou say to be worked out between the owners and Brea , could you elaborate a little more on that. Okay, at the present time, Brea , in a letter sent to us on June 14, 1977, notified us that they have a 10" overflow line from the -2 - Cooper : Reid: Cooper: Wedaa: ff; ~er: Cooper: Harper: Cooper: Harper : Cooper: Wedaa: Brea ponds to the park system that's connected to the District 2 system. At this point in time, it is a technical violation -- let's say a local sewer would have to go in to take the pond out of service; but before that could happen the area would have to annex, or a monthly user charge would have to be lev ied. Now, that would be attributed to who now? The n ew people, the old people or the new and old? It would be attributed to those who are connected to the system. Since it's a Brea line that was connected, I belieya ~that ~it ~~ would be the responsibility of Brea. What I'm trying to find out is that if we have 500 homes up in plus a mobile home park and you want to work the sewer in and the people who want to build in that area, who is ultimately responsible to pay for the cost of putting that in -- the new people the old people ..... . Mr. Harper , would you respond? Mr. Chairman, it would be the property owners in the area because they must annex to the Sanitation District. Okay, then that would be outside --you say annex ... Well, i t 's a ll --nothing behind the darn is in District 2. No, but what I'm trying to determine , in order to put t his sewer line in --1 2t 's clarify this because there's lots of people here who own some of the propery --if the sewer line is put in, who ultimately has to pay for that sewer line --the new people coming in or the old people _or the combination of? I would say the combination of because they will a ll benefit from it. Okay, thanks, that's what I wanted to determine. Now, are there a n y furthe r questions of staff by any members of the Board? All right, l et 's move on to the next phase of this hearing which is the consideration of any public hearings --or oral comments by members of the public who might like to speak on the subject. Is there any member of the aad ience that would like to say something on this subject? Would you come forward please and identify yourself for the record, with your name and address. White: Wedaa: White: Reid : White: Wedaa: Keith: Wedaa: My name is Ron White, 4061 Germander, Irvine , California and our company Her itage Development has title to a substantial land in the Carbon Canyon Area and we are interested in, I believe, the solution mentioned on the last page of this brochure here to solve the problem at the local level , next to the last paragraph. And I'm not sure if I understand what Dennis ment by the Alternate III as being recommended. Is there a specific problem, or would like us to explain it all over again or we'll do either one? I don't want to take up a lot of time but Al t ernate III is upgrading the existing treatment and disposal system --what does that mean? Let me clarify, it involves some modification but it involves exactl y what was stated here on the back --sewering the portion i n Orange County and leaving the area upstream in the County alone to either consider reclamation or status quo. The recommendation number III, Alternative III, is--actually it's the recommendation to funded by local monies. As far as this project being sent to the State we would not receive any funding so it may go to the State in the form of no project. Do you understand that? Yes, we are interested in seeing a sewer assessment District formed from this local level approach. Okay! Thank you . Thank you. Are there further comments f rom the audience on this subject? Milo Ke ith, Keith & Associates in Santa Ana . I represent the City of Brea as a city engineer tonight. We have followed this problem of the Carbon Canyon area with the staff of the District and we are representative on the Sanitation District's staff and if the Directors need any clarification on the planning of the city for this area, I would be glad to answer them. All right, since we apparently have no further comments at the moment from any members of the audience, do any members of the Board have any questions to the city engineer concerning this issue? Okay, before I close the public hearing, is there anyone else who would like to speak on the matter? The Hearing is closed. All right let's move on to item 3, which is consideration the motion directing staff and consulting engineer to prepare Final Environmental Impact Report on Carbon Canyon Facilities P lan. Could I have a motion? I have a motion and seconded. Are there any objections to the motion? Harper: Wedaa: Harper: Wedaa: Harper: We r' "i : Harpe r: Holt: Harpe r: Coop e r: Harper : Graham: Harpe r: Houston: Harper: Ortiz Harpe r: Evans Harper: Perry: Harper: Velasquez: We --~: Harper: We d aa : Mr. Chairman, there is one item which I would like to include in the proceedings and that is to receive and file a listing of the actions to date relative to the Environm ental Impact Report for the Carbon Canyon Faclities P l an. It has to do with actions that the Board has taken since July 14, 1976. It 's just a listing of the actions. Okay , could I have a motion to put it on the agenda as say 2F? Is that satisfactory? Yes All right a motion and seconded. Any objections to adding that item to the agenda? Could I have a motion to accept it? Motion and seconded . Any objections to acceptance? Appearing none, motion carried unanimously. Moving on to item number 3 , the Final EIR could I have a motion . .sorry. .Are there any objections to the motion on item number 3. Hearing none the motion passes unanimously. Let 's move to item number 4 --let 's have a motion considering resolution No. 78-123-2. A motion and seconded. Could I have --let's have a roll call vote , Mr. Harper . Yes , Mr . Chairman . Wedaa Ye s Holt Yes Clark , Riley , Cooper Yes Graham Yes Houston Yest Ortiz Yes Evans Yes Perry Yes Seymour, Roth, Smith , Hoyt, Stanton , Ad l er , Velasquez Yes All right, the motion passes unanimously . Item No. 5 , Mr. Harper is there any other business or communication? We have none, Mr. Chairman Me mb e rs of the Board , are there any other x ~x Exx ~~~x ~~~ busine ss ite ms or communications for the Board to conside r tonight? Hearing r - none, let's move to item 6 --motion to adjourn --seconded,· any .... / objections? The meeting is adjourned. ( __. ') -{;-