The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-06-14 i - COUNSANITATION TY DISTRICTS ��]� TELEPHONES: !�� AREA COOS 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ 962 6 2—2 91 96Z 1 !_ � -2411 P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 7, 1978 NOTICE OF REGULAR flEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, JUNE A 1975 — 7:310. Me 10344 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Se eta y Scheduled upcoming meetings: DISTRICT NO. 2 -- Wednesday, June 21, 1978, at 7 :30 p.m. at the Brea City Hall EXECUTIVE CODI'LAITTEE -- None Scheduled COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)982-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Month Fleeting Date Committee Fleeting Date June June 14, 1978 None Scheduled July July 12, 1978 July 26, 1978 August Aug 9, 1978 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 1978 Sep 27, 1978 October Oct 11, 1978 Oct 25, 1978 November Nov 82 1978 Nov 22, 1978 December Dec 13, 1978 None Scheduled January Jan 10, 1979 Jan 24, 1979 February Feb 14, 1979 Feb 28, 1979 March Mar 14, 1979 Mar 28, 1979 April Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979 June June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 .BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts ►u,r OHIc. Bo, 11127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Televho.ms: Am Code 714 _ JOINT BOARDS :�24;1 AGENDA MEETING DATE JUNE 14, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts DISTRICT 3 (5) Consideration of mction to receive and file minute excerpt from ITEMS ON the following city regarding election of mayor and appointment of SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA alternate, and seating new members of the Board: (*Mayor) City District Active Alternate Seal Beach 3 Frank J. Laszlo* Herald Kent Seitz (6) EACH DISTRICT ' Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 - May 10, 1978, regular District 2 - May 10, 1978, regular District 3 - May 10, 1978, regular District S - May 10, 1978, regular District 6 - May 10, 1978, regular District 7 - May 10, 1978, regular District 11 - May 10, 1978, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) Gencral Manager \ %' (c) General Counsel \, 4 � t (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE............Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) i ? JOINT OPERATING FUND - See pages) "A" , licit and "Eli t CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND - See page(s) "A" , "c" and "Eli DISTRICT NO. 1 _ NONE i S See page "Bit I'D" and 'IF" DISTRICT NO. 2 - P g ( ) 6 DISTRICT N0. 3 _ See page(s) "Bit "D" and "Fit 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 _ NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 _ NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "Bit and t'!D" a DISTRICT NO. 11 - NONE Z - • (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR . ITEMS NOS. 9W THROUGH 9(AA) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. s Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. a s Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from 3 the consent calendar. Ron Can vote or Cost Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing Unanimous Ballot on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. ti (�) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (b) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman and General Manager at a meeting of ocean dischargers in Seattle, Washington, on June 8, 1978, in connection with regulations re waiver of secondary treatment requirements; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by American Standard Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $8,600.48 against C. H. Leavell & Co. , contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75- MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $1,591.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Van Diest Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,100.00 against Skipper & Company, contract for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of the following surplus District vehicles in the most cost-effective manner: One 1962 Dodge One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle'#23) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #52) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #53) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #61) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #62) One 1968 International 24,000 GVW Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #73) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-104, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 11, 1978) See page "G" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-105, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, to Pxoduc�ior., Steel Co., Inc. in the amount of $16,135.00. See pages "H" - and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- 1 1 (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; waive the irregularity in connection with submission of a bid bond; and award Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-093, to James P. Kinney Company in the amount of $S,950.55. See page "J" (j) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No.- J-13-2, clarifying the requirements for the sprinkler modification as required by the Building Code and changing the bid date from June 1 to June 13, 1978. (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, granting a time extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company due to inclement weather. See page "K" DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-111-2 , approving agreement with Lowry $ Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, for a lump sum fee of $8,400.00, in accordance with the procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services. See page "L" (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $3,380.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to replace asphalt bike trail and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $2,300.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for filling of temporary sewer with a mud jacking material and granting a time extension of 9 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "N" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-112-2 , accepting Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "0" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page S) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (p) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, allowing the use of reinforced concrete pipe as an alternate to the vitrified clay pipe, and incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing their right-of-way (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing of their right-of-way (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No.. 78-113-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .755 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, proposed Annexation No. 32 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Bernard Guy for annexation of approximately .5 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in. the City of Anaheim; and Standard Resolution No. 78-114-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 33 - Guy Annexation to- County Sanitation District No. 2. See page 11p11 - (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Warmington Development, Inc. and The Baldwin Company for annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located approximately one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of.Yorba Linda, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "Q" (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and award a contract in an amount not to exceed $12,600.00 for application of zebron coating to manholes on Cypress Avenue Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-9, to repair damages caused by discharge from Collier Chemical Company (Said cost to be reimbursed by Collier Chemical Company) DISTRICT 3 (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-116-3 , approving plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 27, 1978) See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -S- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (w) Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to negotiate and award a contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for repair of manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-1R-4, in an amount not to exceed $45,000 DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statement for the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period from March 28, 1975, through June 30, 1977. DISTRICT 7 (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-117-7 , ordering annexation of 12.531 acres of territory to the District in . the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hill Street in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 71 - Tract No. 9615 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 7.8-118-7, ordering annexation of 1.156 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda, proposed Annexation No. 72 - Stansell Annexation to County Sanitation District �..✓ No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (aa) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Edgewater Development Company for annexation of 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 81 - Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "S" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- r i (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1) Staff report on Joint Works Budgets (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Fiscal Policy Committee recommending adoption of Joint Works Budgets and personnel requirements (3) Consideration of motion approving 1978-79 personnel Roll Can Vote or Cast requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 78-106, Unanimous Ballot amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 ( ROLL CALL Vb7E,,,.,,.., 4) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Joint Operating Budget (5) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint ROLL CALL vo . Works Construction) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to Orange County auditor for immediate payment for �✓ expenditures incurred after June 30, 1978, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1978-79 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts (14) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "Ttt -1 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items re implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage: (Approved 5/10/78 by Boards) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re administration of self-insurance plans. See page ttutt Roll Call Vote or Cast (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-107, adopting settlement Unanimous Ballot procedures for liability claims. See page +Tytt (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Carl Warren & Company for liability claims administration services, and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement for said services in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "Wit (Item 15 continued on page 8) -7- (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Item 15 continued from page 7) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an umbrella liability policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $300,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $33,750 (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-108, establishing program of legal Roll Call vote or cast self-insurance re workers' compensation and authorizing a trust account to Unanimous Ballot accommodate administration of workers' compensation claims. See page "X" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an excess workers' compensation policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $100,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $20,000 (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-109, amending Positions and Roll Call Vote or cast Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, establishing the unanimous Ballot position of Principal Administrative Assistant - Safety, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for workers' compensation claims administration services, in form approved by the General Counsel, subject to approval of selection of said firm by the Fiscal Policy Committee �./ (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report re status of sludge disposition problem. See page "Y" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of a Reconditioned Pettibone, Model SM790, Speed Mixer, Specification No. A-092, for sludge composting, in an amount not to exceed $51,000 plus tax and freight (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items (17-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-110, rejecting all bids for Roll Call Vote or Cast Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, and authorizing the Unanimous Ballot General Manager to establish a bid date for rebid of said project. ITEMS ON See pages "I" and "II" SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Lusl vISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn <; d (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 6 RoN Call Vote or C+;r Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items Unanimous 83110t (24-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-120-6, authorizing execution of ITEMS ON Grant of Easement to the City of Costa Mesa for construction of SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA storm drain by City. See page "III" (25) DISTRICT 6 IT Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 7 _ Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items (26-a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-121-7, ordering annexation Roil Call Vote or Cast of 40.820 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south- Unanimous Ballot westerly of the terminus of Catalina Street in the City of Orange, ITEMS ON proposed Annexation No. 70 - Tract No. 9670 to County Sanitation District SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA No. 7. Board authorized initiation of proceedings February 8, 1978. (26-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-122-7, ordering annexation Roll Call Vote or Cast of 2.18 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the Unanimous Ballot southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, proposed Annexation No. 74 - Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation ITEMS ON District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA District) Board authorized initiation of proceedings March 8, 1978. (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 2 other business and communications or supplemental agenda items (28-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-115-2, to receive and file bid Roll Call Vote or Cast tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract to Christeve Unanimous Ballot Corporation for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, in the amount of $514,204.00; and for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, ITEMS ON Contract No. 2-20, in the amount of $235,006.00. See pages "IV" SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA and "V" (28-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-119-2, ordering annexation Roll Call Vote or Cast of 142.144 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast Unanimous Ballot of the City of Yorba Linda in the Chino Hills area, proposed ITEMS ON Annexation No. 21 - Upper K Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA District No. 2. Board authorized initiation of proceedings May 11, 1977. (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall (30) DISTRICT 11 Verbal staff report re Coastal Commission permit application for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2 (Coastal Commission hearing - Monday, June 12, 1978) (31) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn I -9- .BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ' County Sanitation Districts Post Office So. 0127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 JOIN BOARDS 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE ETSJUNE 14, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. CC1'p Nl9iLEA E... ,_✓ FILES SET UP..:........✓......... / ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REp; gT1;4:S EERiIPIEDs� ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR L@TTE ,r1glrEty,..•.✓,;••. APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD, IN ADDITION, STAFF MININES_ WRITTEN„`.... WILL BE AVAILABLE AT i :00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY v PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE MINUTES FILED.................. ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. Cl) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call i (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests . FILE ------------- (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts LETTER .:...........I A/C .:..TIaR .._ DISTRICT 3 �R._.....-_.._.—. (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from --_,-_- ON the following city regarding election of mayor and appointment of SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA alternate, and seating new members of the Board: ('Mayor) City District Active Alternate Seal Beach 3 Frank j. Laszlo' Herald Kent Seitz (6) EACH DISTRICT ' Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, Ml5 as mailed: District 1 - May 10, 1978, regular District 2 - May 10, 1978, regular District 3 - May 10, 1978, regular District 5 - May 10, 1978, regular District 6 - May 10, 1978, regular District 7 - May 10, 1978, regular District 11 - May 10, 1978, regular FILE .............. - . LETTER ---•— (7) ALL DISTRICTS ....TKLR .- Reports of: �... -•----------- (a) Joint Chairman '(ob General Manager (c) General Counsel r (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE....„........_Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall M�S be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each `..� District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND _ See page(s) - "A" "C" and "E"� CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND - See page(s) "A" "C" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 1 _ NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 _ See page(s) "+B" "D" and IT" DISTRICT NO. 3 _ See page(s) "B" "D" and "F" DISTRICT NO. 5 _ NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 _ NONE ' DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) '!B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 - NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(A) THROUGH 9 (AA) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the ' consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Roll Cali vote of Cast Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing M unanimous Ballot Ion the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS FILE ......--_--_- (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to LETTER ..._._-. designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend �✓ meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other A/C ....TKLR .... functions within the State of California which, in his -- -- - opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith w� (b) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman TETTa and General Manager at a meeting of ocean dischargers in Seattle, A/C -.MR - Washington, on June 8, 1978, in connection with regulations re waiver of secondary treatment requirements; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice FILE -• --• submitted by American Standard Concrete, Inc. in the amount LETTER of $8,600.48 against C. H. Leavell & Co. , contractor for A/c -_.TKLR .... Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at ......... Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice FILE ............... submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $1,591.00 LETTER't%A :!'1 _� against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor A/C -.TKLR - Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice FILE .............. submitted by Van Diest Brothers, Inc. in the amount of IETTERyY:__`-!-!f' $1,100.00 against Skipper & Company, contract for Interplant A/C ....TKLR .--. Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 -'- (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of the following surplus District vehicles in the most cost-effective manner: FILE -""-` One 1962 Dodge One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #23) LETTER -.-_------ One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #52) A/C ..... .... One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #53) - •---• One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #61) „. ....„........„•. One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #62) One 1968 International 24,000 GVW Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #73) FILE ... (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-104, approving plans and LETTER ••-.-_-- specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant A/C No. 1, Job No. PW-062, and authorizing the General Manager to _'__✓ establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: -- July 11, 1978) See page "G" FIL ...�K.)4") Consideration of Resolution No. 78-105, to receive and file bid LETTERs�--z tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for A/C _..TKLR .... Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation �•®.-_,_, Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, to Production, Steel Co. , Inc. in the amount of $16,135.00. See pages "H" - and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) FIL (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation LETTER and recommendation; waive the irregularity in connection p/c KLR .... with submission of a bid bond; and award Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-093, to James P. Kinney Company in the amount of $5,950.55. See page "J" FILE (j) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans LETTER ........... and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, A/C ....TKLR _ clarifying the requirements for the sprinkler modification as required by the Building Code and changing the bid date from June 1 to June 13, 1978. (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the FILE - plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved LETTER --- Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, granting a time A/C .._TKLR _ extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company due to inclement weather. See page "K" - DISTRICT 2 LF� / (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-111-2 , approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services re preparation iETTeRs — of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River A/C ....TKLR - Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, for a lump sum fee of $8,400.00, in accordance with the procedures for selection of professional .Q, engineering and architectural services. See page "L" (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the FILE .................. plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River LETTER .,,.,,.— Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $3,380.00 A/C ._.MLR - to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to replace asphalt bike trail and granting a time extension of 6 calendar ..._..---.. days for completion of said work. See page "M" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the FILE .._......._...- plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $2,300.00 LETTER ..._._..._ to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for filling A/C _-.TKLR .... of temporary sewer with a mud jacking material and granting a ------- time extension of 9 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "N" FLe yam• (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-112-2 , accepting Orange LERs Qai..k ,✓ Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "O" ✓- (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) Consideration of motion approving FILE .---.......... (P) PP g Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to LETTER _ ....•• the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract A/c . .TKLR .... No. 2-19, allowing the use of reinforced concrete pipe as an alternate to the vitrified clay pipe, and incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing their right-of-way FILE .......... (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans LETrER __ and specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, A/c ....rKLR — Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing of their ...........--- right-of-way (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No.. 78-113-2 , authorizing FILE initiation of proceedings to annex .755 acres of territory to LE E _ the District in the Anaheim Hills area, proposed Annexation A/c ... No. 32 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District No. 2 �- (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Bernard Guy for annexation of approximately .5 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive FILE 4.i and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim; and Standard i�LETTER A--.-- Resolution No. 78-114-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings A/C TKLR to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation it�t5, No. 33 - Guy Annexation to. County Sanitation District No. 2. See page npll (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from FILE Warmington Development, Inc. and The Baldwin Company for LETTER annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located approximately ✓ one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba A/C ..9)... Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "Q" FI ✓ (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and LETTER - award a contract in an amount not to exceed $12,600.00 for A/c Z. — application of zebron coating to manholes on Cypress Avenue Aft -•--•••. ....._ Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-9, to repair damages caused by discharge from Collier Chemical Company (Said cost to be reimbursed by Collier Chemical Company) DISTRICT 3 _ (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-116-3 , approving plans and FILE "----`--- specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster LETTER .-'_ Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and �./ A/C .4✓ authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for -- - receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 27, 1978) See page "Rif (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) EnE (w) Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to negotiate and A/C .._TUR — award a contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for repair of manholes ct� _Z - on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-lR-4, in an p o. amount not to exceed $45,000 DISTRICT 5 FILE .......__-_ LETTER ...._ (x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial A/C .._TKLR _ Statement for the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning _ Agency for the period from March 28, 1975, through June 30, 1977. DISTRICT 7 F ILE (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-117-7 , ordering annexation of 12.531 acres of territory to the District in ` the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hill Street in the ._ Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 71 - Tract No. 9615 ® to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the -- - 7th Sewer Maintenance District) FILE ..._._ ;, (z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 7.8-118-7, ordering LETTER annexation of 1.156 acres of territory to the District in the NC TIQR ..- vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda, proposed Annexation g4 No. 72 - Stansell Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (aa) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from fl v Edgewater Development Company for annexation of 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest LETTER.. -.-- corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of uc •• Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, ............. _ proposed Annexation No. 81 - Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation -- - District No. 7. See page I'SII END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- 0 0 (11) ALL DISTRICTS M[ Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: FILE (1) Staff report on Joint Works Budgets LETTER ............- A/C ....TKLR ---- (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of ..»--. Fiscal Policy Committee recommending adoption of Joint Works Budgets and personnel requirements (3) Consideration of motion approving 1978-79 personnel Roll Call Vote or Cast requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 78-106, Unanimous Ballot amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 (4) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Joint Operating Budget FILE LETTER (5) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the A/c .».TKLR 71978-79 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint a .�-v— Works Construction) 13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to Orange County auditor for immediate payment for \Vol) ................ LETTERR expenditures incurred after June 30, 1978, and declaring that such ............ .. certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 A/c »..TKLR .... pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1978-79 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts FILE .................. (14) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER .............. Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "T" A/c ....TKLR .... vzgl M3&ftMAL;.., 4' A »»...�.»..�. (1S) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items re implementation of self-insurance for FILE .».............. workers' compensation and primary liability coverage: (Approved 5/10/78 by Boards) LETTER .»».......« A/c TKLR .... (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General .�..». M ISCounsel re administration of self-insurance plans. See page «Ull Ron Call Vote or Cast (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-107, adopting settlement Unanimous Ballot M1-%�, procedures for liability claims. See page 11VIr LErrE _ r/ (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of d Carl Warren & Company for liability claims administration services, A/c ....TKLR ....✓ and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement for M1�said services in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "Wit v (Item 15 continued on page 8) -7- (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Item 15 continued from page 7) �P�ILR _y............ (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the '° 'W` —!�J'� Districts' insurance broker to place an umbrella liability `rW A/C ....TKLR .... ( r_) policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for S claims in excess of $300,000 primary self-insurance retention, /nL for a total premium not to exceed $33,750 FILE ................» a ✓ (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-108, establishing program of legal ""•aii call vote or cost self-insurance re workers' compensation and authorizing a trust account to A/C ....TKLR ....Unanimous Ballot accommodate administration of workers' compensation claims. See page "X" .----- --- (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the �FILE —,�•• •••„ Districts' insurance broker to place an excess workers' compensation :'' policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims A/C ....TKLR .. in excess of $100,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $20,000 FILE _.:. (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-109, amending Positions and LETM •"-"'"Boll can vote or cast Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, establishing the A/C ....TICLR ...Unanimous Ballot position of Principal .Administrative Assistant - Safety, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) —� - ) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate (EE:1 and execute a contract for workers' compensation claims administration A/C ....TKLR .... services, in form approved by the General Counsel, subject to approval of selection of said firm by the Fiscal Policy Committee N./ (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report re status of sludge disposition problem. See page "Y" tER ..........••. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate e R ........... and award purchase of a Reconditioned Pettibone, Model SM790, Speed TKLR .... Mixer Specification No. A-092 for sludge composting, in an amount not t11a, ' P g to exceed $51,000 plus tax and freight FILE ------ (17) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER --- Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items *AICConsideration of Resolution No. 78-110, rejecting all bids for caWarehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, and authorizing the al General Manager to establish a bid date for rebid of said project. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA See pages IfIft and VIIIII t,iaj DISTRICT 1 Oth business comet tions or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn19'•QLlp (20) DISTRICT 3 0 er busines commune ons or supplemental agenda items, if any �..i (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- (22) DISTRICT s ther busine communicatio supplemental agenda items, if any I (23) DISTRICTS -"'%"-- Consideration of motion to adjourn Q '.c3(s P C 4) DISTRICT 6 .peiFEall-+kte^or Cest Ocher business and communications or supplemental agenda items Unanimous Ballot (24-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-120-6, authorizing execution of MMS ON I'�.� - Easement �s�en�to the City of Costa Mesa for construction of ?SUPPLEMENTAL AGEND storm drain byr Cites a page "III" (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjournq 'a FILE ✓ (26) DISTRICT-7 ' ETT; . . Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items A/C ....TKLR ...• (26-a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-121-7, ordering annexation _._,._,.,,,Ron Call Vote or Cast of 40.820 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south- Unanimous Ballot westerly of the terminus of Catalina Street in the City of Orange, ITEMS ON k proposed Annexation No. 70 - Tract No. 9670 to County Sanitation District SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA No. 7. Board authorized initiation of proceedings February 8, 1978. FILE .......... (26-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-122-7, ordering annexation 'TTE Cali Vote or Cast of 2.18 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the A/c ....TMR , Unanimous Ballot southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, _bQp.�T�,.��'� t� MIS proposed Annexation No. 74 - Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation 1 ITEMS ON District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance yppLEMENTAL AGENDA District) Board authorized initiation of proceedings March 8, 1978. (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( ' a (28) DISTRICT 2 I�tFF ��JI•/i Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items (28-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-115-2, to receive and file bid A/C .._TKLR oil Call Vote or Cast tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract to Christeve P Unanimous Balloy Corporation for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract.No. 2-19, in the MI-C- amount of $514,204.00; and for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, --"- ITEMS ON Contract No. 2-20, in the amount ,of $235,006.00�a See pages r'IV" ¢ SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA and „V' ��,Q,t9y ems- f�Cp pN,.gu�•�/1 C7 jZ10.9-0, FILE ...... .�C� I/ 0 irE (28-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-119-2, ordering annexation Roll Call Vote or Cast of 142.144 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast A/C ....TKLR — Unanimous Ballo� of the City of Yorba Linda in the Chino Hills area, proposed "'-"— ITEMS 01- Annexation No. 21 - Upper K Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation suPpLEMENTpLpGENDA District No. 2. Board authorized initiation of proceedings May 11, 1977. (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall �Cr FitE ... ---+^ (30 DISTRICT 11 Wift, """ � Verbal staff report re Coastal Commission permit application for Coast AN ::TKL Highway Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2 (Coastal Commission hearing - Monday, June 12, 1978 Y = 1 (31) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn'.> -9- �. ¢OARDS OF DIRECTORS . - County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of orange.County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 j BOARDS 9540 62-2411 JOINT62-211 AGENDA MEETING DATE JUNE 14, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMEN HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WIL L BE AVAILABLE AT :00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary . (4) Recognition of special guests (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 - May 10, 1978, regular District 2 - May 10, 1978, regular District 3 - May 10, 1,978, regular District S - May 10, 1978, regular District 6 - May 10, 1978, regular District 7 - May 10, 1978, regular District 11 - May 10, 1978, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ' the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire* to vote differently for any District) C page s)a e "A" "C" and "E" JOINT OPERATING FUND - See '�� CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND - See pages) "A" "C" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 1 - NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 - See page(s) "B'I "D" and "F" DISTRICT NO. 3 - See page(s) "B" "D" and -"F" DISTRICT NO. S _ NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 _ NONE ' DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "•B" and "_..Dt_..t DISTRICT NO. 11' - NONE , (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9W THROUGH 9 (AA) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion' or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from ' the consent calendar -by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on -the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the - . consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. . Chairman will determine if. any items are to be deleted from. the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all- agenda items appearing. on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.. - r (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (b) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman and General Manager at a meeting of ocean dischargers in Seattle, Washington, on June 8, 1978, in connection with regulations re waiver of secondary treatment requirements; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by American Standard Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $8,600.48 against C. H. Leavell $ Co. , contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75- MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $1,591.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Van Diest Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,100.00 against Skipper & Company, contract for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of the following surplus District vehicles in the most cost-effective manner: One 1962 Dodge One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle#23) One 1965' International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #52) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #53) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #61) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #62) One 1968 International 24,000 GVW Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #73) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-104, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: .July 11, 1978) See page "G" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-105, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, to Production Steel Co. , Inc. in the amount of $16,135.00. See pages "H" and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to-receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; waive the irregularity in connection with submission of a bid bond; and award Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-093, to James P. Kinney Company in the amount of $5,950.55. See page "J" (j) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-23, clarifying the requirements for the sprinkler modification as required by the Building Code and changing the bid date from June 1 to June 13, 1978. (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, granting a time extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company due to inclement weather. See page "K" DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-111-2 , approving agreement with Lowry F Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, for a lump sum fee of $8,400.00, lqw) in accordance with the procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services. See page "L" (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $3,380.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to replace asphalt bike trail and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $2,300.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for filling of temporary sewer with a mud jacking material and granting a time extension of 9 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "N" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-112-2 , accepting Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page Stoll (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9). (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) �•.� (p) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, allowing the use of reinforced concrete pipe as an alternate to the vitrified clay pipe, and incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing their right-of-way (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum-No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing of their right-of-way (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-113-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .755 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, proposed Annexation No. 32 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Bernard Guy for annexation of approximately .5 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim; and Standard Resolution No. 78-114-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 33 - Guy Annexation to. County Sanitation District No. 2. See page 11p11 (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Warmington Development, Inc. and The Baldwin Company for annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located approximately one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 34 - Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and award a contract in an amount not to exceed $12,600.00 for application of zebron coating to manholes on Cypress Avenue Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-9, to repair damages caused by discharge from Collier Chemical Company (Said cost to be reimbursed by Collier Chemical Company) . DISTRICT 3 (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-116-3 , approving plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 27, 1978) See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- r� A_ (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (w) Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to negotiate .and award a contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for repair of manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer; Contract No. 3-1R-4, in an amount not to exceed $45,000 DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statement for the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period from March 28, 1975, through June 30, 1977. DISTRICT 7 (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-117-7 , ordering annexation of 12.531 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hill Street in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 71 - Tract No. 9615 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 7.8-118-7, ordering annexation of 1.156 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda, proposed Annexation No. 72 - Stansell Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (aa) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Edgewater Development Company for annexation of 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 81 - Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "S" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report �.d (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1) Staff report on Joint Works Budgets (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Fiscal Policy Committee recommending adoption of Joint Works Budgets and personnel requirements (3) Consideration of motion approving 1978-79 personnel requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 78-106, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 (4) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Joint Operating Budget (5) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1978, and declaring that such certification .shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1978-79 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts (14) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "Tff (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items re implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage: (Approved 5/10/78 by Boards) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re administration of self-insurance plans. See page duff (b) *Consideration of Resolution No. 78-107, adopting settlement procedures for liability claims. See page ffVIV (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Carl Warren & Company for liability claims administration services, and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement for said services in form approved by the General Counsel. See page 'tWff (Item 15 continued on page 8) -7- (1S) ALL DISTRICTS (Item 15 continued from page 7) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an umbrella liability policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $300,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $33,750 (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-108, establishing program of legal self-insurance re workers' compensation and authorizing a trust account to accommodate administration of workers' compensation claims. See page "X" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an excess workers' compensation policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $100,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $20,000 (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-109, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, establishing the position of Principal Administrative Assistant - Safety, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for workers' compensation claims administration services, in form approved by the General Counsel, subject to approval of selection of said firm by the Fiscal Policy Committee (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report re status of sludge disposition problem. See page "Y" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of a Reconditioned Pettibone, Model SM790, Speed Mixer, Specification No. A-092, for sludge composting, in an amount not to exceed $51,000 plus tax and freight (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-110, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, to in the amount of $ (Bid opening 6/13/78 - See Supplemental Agenda) (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) ' DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-115-2, to receive and file bid tabulations and recommendations and awarding contract(s) for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, to in the amount of $ and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, to in the amount of $ (Bid opening 6/13/78 - See Supplemental Agenda) V■r� (29)� DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall (30) DISTRICT 11 Verbal staff report re Coastal Commission permit application for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2 (Coastal Commission hearing - Monday, June 12, 1978) (31) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post office Sox 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: ® ((-��' Area Code 714 540-2910 JOINT B O^e LU 3 962-2411 IIAGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JUNE 14, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICT 3 (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the following city regarding election of mayor and appointment of alternate, and seating new members of the Board: (*Mayor) City District Active Alternate Seal Beach 3 Frank J. Laszlo* Herald Kent Seitz ALL DISTRICTS (17-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-110, rejecting all bids for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish a bid date for rebid of said project. See pages "I" and "II" DISTRICT 6 (24-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-120-6, authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to the City of Costa Mesa for construction of storm drain by City. See page "III" DISTRICT 7 (26-a) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-121-7, ordering annexation of 40.820 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south- westerly of the terminus of Catalina Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 70 - Tract No. 9670 to County Sanitation District No. 7. Board authorized initiation of proceedings February 8, 1978. (26-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-122-7, ordering annexation of 2.18 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, proposed Annexation No. 74 - Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) Board authorized initiation of proceedings March 8, 1978. 31 DISTRICT 2 (28-a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-115-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract to Christeve Corporation for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, in the amount of $514,204.00; and for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, in the amount of $235,006.00. See pages "IV" and "V" (28-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-119-2, ordering annexation of 142.144 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast of the City of Yorba Linda in the Chino Hills area, proposed Annexation No. 21 - Upper K Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. Board authorized initiation of proceedings May 11, 1977. `ter' -2- RESOLUTION NO. 78-110 REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. 3-13-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 3, 52 62 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,' 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, in accordance with the provisions of Section 475S of the State Health and Safety Code, and on June 13, 1978, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and, WHEREAS, the bids received have been evaluated by the Districts' engineers, and the apparent low bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately forty- seven (47) percent; and, WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written recommendation that said bids be rejected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: .Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That all bids received for said work be hereby rejected; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish. a bid date for rebid. of said project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "I" AGENDA ITEM ##17(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "I" B I D T A D U L A T 1 0 N � • S 11 E' E T June 13, 1978 11 :00 A.M. JOB NO. . J-13-2 PROJECT TITLE WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION PROJECT DESCRIPTION_ Supplying all labor, equipment, materials and forces necessary for the complete work. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 125, 000 BUDGET. AMOUNT $ REMARKS • CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1 • Dacon Construction Corp. Santa Ana, Ca. 183,998. 00 • 2• Magnus Co. ' Fullerton, CA 197, 850. 00 •3. Bayside Builders & .Engr. Santa Ana, CA 214,247.00 T & H Construction Downey; CA , 236,586.00 5. 6 7 • • 8 90. 3.0 "II" DISTRICTS .A L AGENDA ITEM #17CA) - . �. lit, or RESOLUTION NO. 78-120-6 AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAIN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR CONSTRUC- TION OF CITY STORM DRAIN The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated , wherein an easement in the vicinity between Harbor Boulevard and the Santa Ana River, north of the San Diego Freeway, in the City of Costa Mesa, for construction of a storm drain, is hereby granted to the City of Costa Mesa; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted for no fee; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978, "III" AGENDA ITEM #24(A) - DISTRICT 6 "III" v ' RESOLUTION NO. 78-115-2 AWARDING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROJECTS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, AND ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-202 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the projects for construction of RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, and ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, are hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file Notices of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation 'this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry and Associates, District's engineer, and concurred in by the 'District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to- CHRISTEVE CORPORATION for RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, and ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for the Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, be awarded to Christeve Corporation in the total amount of $514,204.00; and the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, be awarded to Christeve Corporation in the total amount of $235,006.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor "IV-l" AGENDA ITEM #28 W - DISTRICT 2 for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, � Section S. That all other bids -for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "IV-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(A) - DISTRICT 2 "IV-2" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T CONTRACT N0." 2-19 &• 2-20 PROJECT TITLE RICHFIELD SUB_TRUNK,• CONTRACT NO-. - 2-19• &- ORCHARD (KELLOGG) • SUB -TRUNK t CONTRACT NO. 2-20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sewer line construction on• Richfield &. Kellogg• from• Orangethorpe to -La -Palma $ 450,000.00 (2-19) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $204,000.00 (2-20) BUDGET AMOUNT $' DATE, June 13, 1978 - 11 A.M. CONTRACTOR TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 2-19 2-20 2-19 & 2-20 DEDUCT TOTAL BID 1' Christeve Corp. Arcadia, CA 514 ,204. 00 235, 006.00 749 ,210. 00 15,000. 00 734 ,210. 00 c� rm 2• Bebek Co. Irvine, CA 530,831. 00 222, 569. 00 753,400. 00 10,000. 00 743.400. 00 ran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =� 3' N Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 00 Long Beach, CA 90805 644, 288. 00 326,474. 00 970,762. 00 15,000. 00 955.1762. 00 a 1 4' N.A. Artukovich d San Diego, CA 641,645. 00 322, 725. 00- 964,370. 00 -0- 964 ,370.00 5' John A. Artukovich Azusa, CA 618,001.00 359,037. 00 977, 038. Q0 10, 000. 00 967,038. 00 r.� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6• Steve P. Rados Santa Ana, CA 738, 865. 00 278.1900. 00 1,017, 765 . 00 20,000. 00 -997,765.00 7. Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. Upland, CA 775,015.00 333,940. 00 1,108,955. 00 10,000. 00 1,098,955. 00 8. . . . 9. ' MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT post Office Box 8127 .. SCounty Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-291 JOINT BOARDS 9622411 Regular Meeting June 14, 1978 - 7 : 30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting . To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager' s Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and con- tracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer' s estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. ..i The Jarvis/Gann Amendment Pursuant to the instructions of the Executive Committee, the staff is reviewing the CORF budget for the purpose of deleting those projects which can be deferred, in light of passage of the Jarvis/Gann Amendment. A full discussion of the effects of Proposition 13 will be held next Wednesday when the Joint Works Operating and Construction budgets are considered. The individual District budgets will be considered by the Boards at the August Joint meeting . Joint Boards No. 9-a - General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel at Meetings . For the past several years , the General Manager has been autho- rized on an annual basis to designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings , conferences , etc. , within the State, which he believes will be of value to the Districts . It is recommended that this authorization be renewed. No. 9-b - Ratifying Attendance re EPA Hearing - Ocean Waiver Regulations , Seattle , Washington. The Joint Chairman and General Manager represented the Districts at the West Coast hearing June 8th in Seattle , Washington, to give testimony relative to EPA' s proposed regulations for waiver of Federal secondary treatment requirements for deep ocean dischargers . The action appearing on the agenda authorizes reimbursement of expenses incurred. No. 9-f - Surplus Vehicles . During the 1978-79 fiscal year, the Districts will be replacing six vehicles (10-14 years old) . The staff is requesting authority to dispose of these trucks in the most cost-effective manner. We expect to include these vehicles in city equipment auctions as the new re- placements are delivered. No. 9-g - Plans and S ecifications for Miscellaneous Pavingat Reclamation Plant No. - Job No. PW- The staff has prepared the plans and specifications for repair, resurfacing and sand slurry coating for the asphalt surfaces at Re- clamation Plant No. 1. Included in this project is the construction of the public sidewalk area easterly of the main entrance that is re- quired by the City of Fountain Valley. This is a regularly budgeted item. The engineer' s estimate for the project is $100,000. The staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications , with bids to be received July llth. No. 9-h - Award of Job PW-066 - Modification _o_fExisting Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1. At the May meeting, the Board approved the plans and specifications prepared by the staff for the modification of the sludge hopper outlet ports at Plant No. 1. This is a $20,000 budgeted item, for which the engineer' s estimate of construction was $20, 000. Bids were received and opened on June 1st. Two bids. were received, ranging from a high of $16, 854 to the low of $16, 135. The staff recommends that award be made to Production Steel Company, Inc. , in the amount of $16,135 . No. 9-i - Award of Specification No. E-093 - Acquisition of Two- Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No . Bids were received and opened on May 30th for this budgeted equip- ment item which is a part of the- pre-chlorination facilities at Plant No. 2. Three bids were received, which ranged from a low of $5 , 950. 55 to a high of $8,194. 86. The staff recommends award that award be made to J. P. Kinney Company of Los Angeles , in the amount of $5 ,950.55 . The staff' s estimate for purchase of this equipment was $6,000. No. 9-j - Addendum No. 1 to Job No. J-13-2 - Warehouse Expansion. This Addendum clarifies the requirements for the sprinkler modifi- cation as required by the Building Code and revises the bid date from June 1 to June 13 , 1978. The staff recommends the approval of this Addendum. -2- No. 9-k - Change Order No. 2 to Job No. P2-23-6. This change order for the $30 million Major Facilities under construction at Plant No. 2 is to extend the contract completion date by 81 calendar days as a result of inclement weather during January, February and March. The 81 calendar days reflect the days of rain or loss of time as a result of the rain during the past winter. The staff recommends approval of this change order at no additional cost to the Districts . District No. 2 . No. 9-1 - A rovin Engineering Services for Olive Subtrunk, Contract No. 2- R River Damage Repairs) . Pursuant to the Board' s authorization and in accordance with the procedures for the selection of engineering services , negotiations were held with representatives of Lowry & Associates to provide the necessary engineering for plans and specifications for the Rehabilitation of the Olive Subtrunk which was destroyed during the winter run-off flows in the Santa Ana River last February. The replacement of this sewer, which will be partially financed by the Federal Disaster Relief Fund, is scheduled to be constructed before October 15th (beginning of the rainy season) . The negotiated fee for the basic services was agreed at $8,400 (65% of ASCE fee curve for a similar project) , including preliminary engineering, surveys for design and preparation of plans and detailed specifications . The acceptance of the proposal from Lowry & Associates , which is included with the agenda, is recommended with a contract to be written and executed for this project. No. 9-m,n,& o - Acce tance of Contract No. 2-5R Orange Subtrunk, Santa Ana River Crossing River Damage -Repair . This contract for the restoration of the damaged Orange Subtrunk Crossing of the Santa Ana River has been completed. Two change orders for miscellaneous items modify the final contract amount by an additional $5, 680 and extends the contract 15 calendar days . Chan e Order No. 1 - This change order is for the restoration ot the asphaltic concrete surface on the bike trails adjacent to the working area. These bike trails were damaged during the emergency construction and had to be restored to their original condition. This change order is for an additional $3, 380 and extends the contract time by 6 calendar days . Chan a Order No. 2 - This change order adds $2, 300 to t e contract amount for filling the corrugated metal temporary sewer with a mud jacking material to act as a protective barrier from further erosion immediately downstream of the permanent installation. -3- r This change order also extends the original contract time by an additional 9 calendar days because of re- u strictions imposed on the Districts by the Corps of Engineers in discharging flood waters from Prado Dam. The staff recommends approval of Change Orders Nos . 1 and 2 and the execution of a final closeout agreement with John Artukovich & Sons , Inc. , contractors for this project . The final contract amount is $281, 780. The staff also recommends the filing of a Notice of Completion for this project in accordance with Districts ' policy. The sewer replacement is partially funded by the Federal Disaster Relief Fund. No. 9-p - Approving Addendum No. 1 to Contract No. 2-19 . This Addendum allows the use of either vitrified clay pipe or reinforced concrete pipe for the 42-inch sewer pipe size specified. The inclusion of the alternate material will help in attracting more competition in the bidding for this work. The staff recommends approval of this Addendum. No. 9-q - A rovin Addendum No T to Contract No. 2-20 and Addendum No. 2 to Contract No. -19 . These addenda incorporate the requirements of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for the crossing of each sewer southerly of La Palma Avenue. The insurance requirements and other license conditions were not received until after the plans and speci- fications were released to prospective bidders . The staff recommends approval of these addenda. No. 9-r - Initiation of Annexation No. "32 - Anaheim Hills Annexa- tion No. 8 (0. 75 acres) . Anaheim Hills , Inc. , has requested annexation of 0. 75 acres of property in the City of Anaheim. This area has been zoned for estate sized lots , 22, 000 square feet, and the annexation is requested to be incorporated in a development of areas previously annexed to the District. The staff recommends initiation of proceedings for this proposed annexation. No. 9-s - Initiation of Annexation No. 33 Guy Annexation (0. 5 Acres) . We are in receipt of a request to annex a 1/2 acre single resi- dential parcel located on Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. The staff is requesting initiation of annexation proceedings since this particular parcel has been of some concern to the City of Anaheim staff as well as the County Health Department. The existing residence cesspool system has failed, causing a health hazard on the parcel and on adjacent properties . This residential parcel conforms to the District' s Master Plan for land use and all necessary fees have been paid. -4- No. 9-u - Contract Negotiation for Coating Damaged Manholes . Twenty-one manholes on the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer , Contract No. 2-9, have been damaged by discharges from the Collier Chemical Company. The company has deposited $12 , 600 with the District, based on staff estimate of damages . The staff recommends repairing the manholes by applying a Zebron coating, which is a high-density polyurethane and impervious to most chemicals . This material is a proprietary product, therefore the staff is requesting authority to negotiate a contract for the repair of the manholes in an amount not to exceed $12, 600. District No. 3 No. 9-v - Plans and Specifications for Contract No. 3-13-1 - Westside Force Main. Plans and specifications have been completed by the District's consulting engineer (Boyle Engineering Corporation) for the second unit of the Westside Force Main which extends easterly from 'the Seal Beach Pumping Station at Seal Beach Boulevard, along Westminster Boulevard to Rancho Street in the City of Westminster. At the present time, only one force main serves the westerly portion of the District, including the Cities of Seal Beach, Los Alamitos , Cypress , La Palma, Cerritos , and portions of Stanton and Buena Park. This second unit would provide reliability necessary to insure continuous operation, as well as to provide capacities for future flows in the drainage area. The engineer' s estimate for this project is $1. 6 million. Bids are tentatively planned to be received on July 27th. The staff recommends approval of plans and specifications for this project. No . 9-w - Authorit to Ne otiate for Contract Services - Contract No. 3-1R-4 Mi er Holder Trun Sewer. When the Miller Holder Trunk Sewer was constructed in the late 1950' s , PVC liner plate was installed in the pipe, but the manhole structures received a paint-like coating for corrosion protection. This coating material has deteriorated, requiring the replacement with the PVC liner plate in all manhole shafts . Contracts have been awarded for the repair of manhole shafts on this major interceptor sewer over the past nine years . In each of the previous contracts , the District has received only one bid because of the specialization of this type of remedial work and has resulted in rejection of the bid with a subsequent negotiated price to perform the work with the par- ticular contractor. The staff is , therefore, recommending that the General Manager be authorized to award a contract in an amount not to exceed $45 , 000 for the repair of the PVC lining in manholes on the Miller Holder Trunk Sewer. Negotiations will be conducted with F. B . Cook Corporation, who has performed this repair work for the Districts on previous contracts . -5- District No. 7 No. 9-y - Ordering Annexation No. 71. At the January meeting, the Board initiated annexation proceedings for Tract No. 9615 which is located in the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hills Street in the Lemon Heights area of the unincorporated portion of the County. This tract contains approximately 12 . 5 &cres and is proposed to be developed with 22 single-family dwelling units with a minimum lot size of 20, 000 square feet. This annexation has been approved by LAFC. The staff, therefore , recommends approval of Resolution No. 78-117-7, ordering 'annexation of this tract to the District. The parcel will be served by the 7th Sewer Maintenance District. All required fees have been received. No. 9-z - Ordering Annexation No . 72. In January, the District Directors initiated proceedings for the annexation of approximately 1. 2 acres in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Verda in the unincorporated portion of the County. This matter was subsequently forwarded to LAFC which has approved the parcel for annexation. This area proposes the development of four single-family homes and will be served by the 7th Sewer Maintenance District. The staff, therefore, recommends approval of Resolution No. 78-118 -7 , ordering annexation of this parcel to the District. All necessary fees have been paid by the proponent. All Districts Nos . 11 and 12 - Report of the Executive Committee. The Committee met on May 24th with the Fiscal Policy Committee and enclosed for Board members is. a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . No. 13 - Payment of Claims after June 30, 1978. The Districts ' budgets are adopted at the August Joint Board meeting each year, and therefore it is necessary to have Board autho- rization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of next year' s budget. It is recommended that the action appearing on the agenda be approved. No. 14 - Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. As provided in the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure , nominations for these two offices are made at the regular June meeting, with elections to take place at the July regular Joint Board meeting. For the new Directors ' information, we have included in the supporting documents section of the agenda material , an excerpt from the Rules of Procedure for Meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. -6- No. 15 - Implementation of Self-Insurance for Workers ' Com- pensation and Primary Liability Coverage. Pursuant to the Boards ' authorization last month, the General Counsel and staff are recommending the eight actions appearing under this item on the agenda. A report from the General Counsel is in- cluded in the agenda supporting documents ; see page "V" . No. 16 - Status of Sludge Disposal Problems and Request for Purchase of Equipment. The staff has included a status report on our sludge disposal problems in the agenda supporting material; see page "Y . Since all alternatives involve the acquisition of several pieces of equipment for composting the digested sludge material for recycling or landfill, the staff requests authorization to negotiate for the purchase of an available reconditioned speed mixer machine for sludge composting in an amount not to exceed $51,000 , plus taxes and freight. (1978-79 Joint Works budget, solids disposal and transportation facilities , $500,000) . No. 17 - Award of Contract for Warehouse Office Expansion. Construction bids will be received Tuesday, June 13th for the Warehouse Office Expansion; $150 ,000 was budgeted this year for the project. Because many contractors are busy, the bidding may not be as competitive as we would like. In the event the bids come in substantially over our estimate , the staff will recommend deferment of this project until the bidding climate is better. District No. 2 No. 28 - Award of Contracts 'for Construction bf the Richfield Interceptor and the Kel o Orc and Subtrunk Bid Opening Tuesday, June 3 . These two subtrunks are a part of the District' s Master Plan facilities which are designed to relieve the Atwood Subtrunk in Orange- thorpe Avenue, diverting the flows into the Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor in La Palma Avenue. The Richfield Interceptor consists of approximately 3 ,000 feet of 42-inch sewer which is estimated to cost $450, 000 . The Kellogg (Orchard) Subtrunk consists of approximately 2,000 feet of 27-inch sewer which is estimated to cost $204,000. Bids for both projects (1977-78 Budget Richfield Trunk $475, 000; Kellogg (Orchard) Trunk $223 ,000) are being taken concurrently to give a con- tractor the option of bidding on both projects or each project separately. -7- No. 29 - Adjourned Meeting June 21st , Public Hearin re Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Carbon Canyon Facilities P an. The District No. 2 Board should adjourn to 7 : 30 p.m. , June 21 at the Brea City Hall for the purpose of conducting a public hearing relative to the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan and Environmental Impact Statement . The Board set this hearing date and location at the April 12th meeting. District No. 11 No. 30 - Coastal Commission Permit Application for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer. The hearing before the Coastal Commission on the Districts ' application for the Master Plan Coast Highway Trunk Sewer will be held Monday, June 12. The Commission' s staff has recommended denial on the basis of the following findings : 1. The proposed project is an integral and functional phase of the entire Sanitation District #11 project and approval of the' proposed project represents implied consent to the approval of the Sanitation- District ;rIll project. 2, As proposed Sanitation District #11 project will have adverse cumulative effects upon the restoration and maintenance of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve and is therefore not in conformity with Sections 30230, 30231 and 30240 of the Coastal Act. . 3. The proposed project , considered as a whole , will reduce develop- ment costs , increase land values , and encourage the development of. Bolsa Chica marsh and bluffs . It has not yet been determined whether or not the development of Bolsa .Chica marsh and bluffs is consistent with Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act , thus , the proposed project which induces development in those areas is inconsistent with Section 30254 of the Coastal Act. 4. There are feasible alternatives and feasible mitigation measures as provided in CEQA, such as delaying the project until the LCPs have been prepared and certified, available for imposition by this Commission under the power granted to it which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the development , as finall proposed may have on the environment . 5. The proposed development is not in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and will substantially prejudice the ability of the local government to prepare a local coastal progYam that is in conformity with said chapter. -8- It appears the staff denial recommendation is based on future ..i planned extensions to the Coast Highway Trunk in the Bolsa Chica area, rather than the project considered in the application request. The Districts ' staff will suggest to the Commission that the project under consideration will serve the present and future needs of the area south of Garfield and west of Newland Streets (approxi- mately 1/4 of Huntington Beach) . The staff will report verbally as to the outcome of Monday' s hearing. Fred A. Harper General Manager I I .e RE: AGENDA ITEM #30 — DISTRICT 11 Of CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR.•Govemor ALIFO�NIA COASTAL COMMISSION dp AST REGIONAL COMMISSION ' SOUTH CO 666 E OCEAN BOULEVARD, SU17E 3107 P.O. BOX 1450 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801 (A3) 590.5071 (714 64) 846.08 May 31, 1978 To: Commissioners From: Executive Director Subject: Staff Summary and Recommendations Application No. : P-78-3184 Attachments: 1: Site & Vicinity Map 2, Master Plan of Sewers for District #11 3. Environmental Impact Report 4. 6. 1. Administrative Action: The application has been reviewed and is complete. The. 42-day hearing. period expires 6-15-78 Public Hearing is scheduled for 6-12-78 Continuations , (if any) were granted as follows : a. b. C. \..4. Applicant: Orange County Sanitation *District' #Il 714/540-2910 Applicant' s full name Telephone number P.O. Box 8127 Address , Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Or Dennis M. Reid Representative ' s name Telephone number same Address 3. Project Location: (a)• City or District Huntington Beach llwv� (b) County Orange (c) Street Address Along Pacific Coast Hwy. (d) Area is •Zoned Public Right-Of-Way & Recreational Use L_7 L_ 77 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: � Construction of approximately three miles of 84-inch diameter sewer interceptor along the seaward side of Pacific Coast Highway from Lake Street to Brookhurst Street , thence northeasterly on Brookhurst approximately 0. 3 mile to Treatment Plant #2 and a 0. 5 mile connectir- reach southerly along Newland Street between Hamilton Avenue and t Pacific Coast Highway. LOCATION DESCRIPTION & STREET ADDRESS: See project description above. The project is located entirely within the City of Huntington r Beach. D ISTANCE FROM MEAN HIGH TIDE LINE: ad's cent to the beach. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: public right-of-way and recreation SITE SIZE N.A. -- sq. f t. DENSITY: Gross: N.A. Net: UNIT MIX: N.A. — ON-SITE PARKING: Primary = N.A: Size = Tandem = Size = Total = PROJErCT HEIGHT: Above AFG = N.A. Above CFR = PROJECT COST: $ 2, 200, 000 EIR: Final EIR AGENCY APPROVAL: Aoproval in Concert = City Council, RWQCB, Dept. of Parks and Recreation, Dept. of Fish and Game, Orange County EMA. -2- f - Issues: 1. Growth Inducement 2. Preservation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas 3. Premature Commitment of Planning Options Growth Inducement: Staff would point out that the project before the Commission is a three-mile interceptor system (Reaches 1 and 2) of a proposed eight mil - e system which forms Orange County Sanitation District #11. When • ' completed this sewerage system will extend easterly from Warner Ave. , around the periphery and through environs of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, down Walnut St. from the intersection with Golden West St. to Lake St. where it interconnects with the proposed Reaches 1 and 2. It is staff' s opinion that consideration of the proposed project out of context with the cumulative impact .of the total integrated system as described in the Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report woul the represent inept and piecemeal planning. Further, construction of roject at this time reduces development costs , increases landvalues and .encourages development of Bolsa Chica marsh and b1u._f. The following citation has been extracted from the Environmental Impact Report (emphasis added) : ' 1.1 Project Description `�•� The Master Plan of Sewers for the City of Huntington Beach and l County Sanitation District No. 11 proposes the construction of several i sewer facilities between 1977 and 1935. The sewer facilities are proposed for construction in both developed and undeveloped areas of Huntington Beach and along the southeastern portion of the unincorporated Bolsa Chica area. They have been designed to accomodate anticipated growth in the City of Huntington Beach, in accordance with the City s existing zoning maps'and plans of the Signal Landmark Company for the Bolsa Chica area. They are also designed to provide for gravity flow and 'for solutions to problems of inter- district flows, where possible. The key feature of the proposed Master Plan of Sewer Facilities is the Coast Trunk Sewer, which extends northward from •Brookhurst Street along Pacific Coast Highway to Lake Street, along Walnut _Street from Lake Street to Golden West Street, through undeveloped land ; between Gol den West Street and bluffs south of the Bolsa Chica, along the southeastern edge of the Bolsa Chica area, and northward across the bluffs to Los Patos Avenue, near Warner Avenue. , S • i t continued. . . . . . . r '�r 1.2 Environmental Impacts Land Use Sewer facilities are proposed for construction through residential , commercial , industrial and open. space areas of the City of Huntington Beach and the unincorporated Bolsa Chica area. Certain land' use activities may be I temporarily inconvenienced by the proposed sewer construction; e.g. , commer- cial land uses along Beach Boulevard, Pacific Coast Highway between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard, Main Street near Walnut Avenue, and Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street; and recreational use of Central Park. In the long-term, the proposed sewer facilities will indirectly contribute to the conversion of agri- cu. ur,1 -and other open space land to urban development. Section 30254 of the 1976 Coastal. Act states, in part the following (emphasis added) : "New or expanded public works facilities shall be designed and limited to accommodate needs generated by development or uses permitted consistent with the provisions of this division. . . . Special districts shall not be formed or expanded except where the service would not induce new development inconsis- tent .with this division. It is clearly indicated that the proposed project is not needed at this time. It is likewise clear that it is only needed for the future development of central Huntington Beach and the Bolsa Chica area which will, . ". . .indirectly contribute to the conversion of agriculture and open space land to urban develop- ment." 1 In .staff'.s opinion approval of the proposed project would constitute implied consent to do exactly that. Preservation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas : The total project will, when completed, encroach upon the periphery and surrounding area of the Bolsa Chica State Ecological Reserve. Sections 30230 and 30231 of the 1976 Coastal Act read as follows : 1opus cit .� '30230. Maine resources shall be maintained, enhanced, and, c _ where feasible, restored. Special protection shall be given to areas and species of special biological or economic significance.Uses of the marine environment shall be carried out in a manner that will sustain I the biological productivity of coastal waters and that will maintainl healthy populations of all species of marine organisms adequate for long-term commercial, recreational, scientific, and educational! purposes. 30231. The biological productivity and. the quality of coastal' waters, streams, wetlands,*estuaries, and lakes appropriate to.' maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for thel protection of human health shall be maintained and,where feasible, restored through,among other means,minimizing adverse effects of� waste water discharges and entrainment, controlling runoff,' preventing depletion of ground water supplies and substantial interference with surface waterflow, encouraging waste water; reclamation, maintaining natural vegetation buffer areas that' protect riparian habitats, and minimizing alteration of. natural- streams. Development of the Final-' 'rro j ect"and its' urbdh "grow'th'in'ducenfent,-t•• aspects will generate several coastal planning issues which directly relate to the preservation of the Ecological Reserve. These issues are best addressed by the following excerpt from Alternative Plans for Bolsa Chica prepared by EDAW, Inc. , Planning Consultants, for the Bo sa C ica Study Group of the Orange County Environmental Agency in May 1978 (emphasis added) : Related Planning Several other planning efforts beyond thor:e already noted, such as the Local Coastal Pro- gram, have been identified which have a direct influence on, or will be affected by the ul- timate plan of Dolsa Chica, and need to be • part of the criteria for comparing any future alternatives. They include: o The possible widening of Pacific Coast Highway.. � o The proposed Coastal Trunkline (sewer) j and upcoming master plan of sewers I for the City of Huntington Beach. ! T o An automobile beach access point be- tween Warner and Goldenwest. ! o The reconstruction of the Warner Avenue Bridge.• o The resolution of the road network north of the Gap. o A study of vacant school sites by the Oceanview School District. o The Seacliff IV residential develop- ment on Huntington Beach Mesa. o The proposed expansion of the East Garden Grove -- Wintersburg Channel. -5- Premature Commitment of Planning Options : The City of Huntington Beach and Orange County are currently in various phases of the preparation of their local coastal programs . 1,� The project would encourage development of the Bolsa Chica marsh and bluff area before the LCn has determined the nature of develop- ment, if any, which is consistent with the habitat values of the area. This would seriously foreclose planning options for the LCP, and would tend to endorse the residential proposals put forth by the Signal Landmark Company. Further, aside from the cumulative effect of aforementioned factors , it is the opinion of staff that sewer District #11, or any part thereof, should not be approved until the local coastal programs have determined- that uses requir- ing sewer service are consistent with the 1976 Coastal Act . s ; Findings 1. The proposed project is an integral and functional phase of the ` t entire Sanitation District #11 project and approval of the proposed project represents implied consent to the approval of the Sanitation. i District 411 project. 2, As proposed Sanitation District #11 project will have adverse cumulative effects upon the restoration and maintenance of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve and is therefore not in conformity with Sections 30230, 30231 and 30240 of the Coastal Act. . 3. The proposed project , considered as a whole, will reduce develo* men t costs , increase land values , and encourage the development of Bolsa Chica marsh and bluffs . It has not vet been determined whether . or not the development of Bolsa Chica marsh and bluffs is consistent with Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act , thus , the proposed project which induces development in those areas is inconsistent with Section 30254 of the Coastal Act. i 4. There are feasible alternatives and feasible mitigation measures as provided in CEQA, such as delaying; the project until the LCps have been prepared and certified, available for imposition by this Cou�nission under the power granted to it which would substantially lessen any significant adverse iupact that the development , as finally proposed may have on the environment . 5. The proposed development is not in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and will substantially prejudice the ability of the local government to prepare a local coastal progtam that is in conformity with said chapter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial Staff Planner Pickens me a • t II n •'�i r1. V• .Li i an"w{4. i • a •(,.tt;l * wavMs.M s - .•! f� r t• _ P �/ {att �ru•ra w Sao f •. C t a: S '� �•Io,,.�a I'1. '.«.-....a. �- • * - �•JylaY ~��•Y :+•"_ ti O! aNu.w t■• . i•T „ N N : 1 pi i;2 ulnw•' " •fly.• •• a a.aK W a h w.rrt go 4 •, / \ ,�A I -•' M�tK•a7 � f�•�t: !�• i �1�.' + ■ .��o �Kuti/tf.t'. ��I` - ♦ •\' �y aOa+Y wtti &W"st f p. ( r. f• t+.•6: .t t a S i 1[.aRfafMwYCn}�f ..1 •� J its��i �� a• ; S71aK l�1'0�a� ;.-••. i•.•---' 1» I '9�+/• a'•`• L7D •ew•ar..o ! N• L i _ r t 1f`ta..aa.• o Zt i . k R t2Y i N / + . `.'y �. rs ant■• • .�---- Nt I,`�` �•', `l 2 .�L`�� ..no•m ,+`Z`►Natit.wlf Ca •r 1�s•.plY.� LLI • ' 1.. to us,^s a..-O L•-11�� !+. -.wyaM Co. r - -�-------— �-scattiao—' - — .• 1l :�-i, �t:.00ty. •�.._Lii.v�+::�-•` N ="!= •i«..o.c M r/tittr)•{t iM \ •.4� 'lA� ,• • nsoR Rr 1 Q K { 'v a�._• t4•w• ..h.M'■W[•• I •wvwitw IN \ �� l r• Wan7 tilt co- t �a ♦. <•�` { 2 ♦a/f1•.a trw`i^.7 at ttyp■t a. W t9 a1 .. ( u : ..,. s •_.. L��L(1-•'IA I �t-•.t• as 4 o-• ,■ i..C3�••• v%1-.�� 1 M♦a:raiOritC lM `^:••t• s ru&Qy'�a tw s *�:•w AV t..`.'r•'1!." t crestiar.tao tN ,•,� 8A1►FiD1G r ,,rt ,•, 1 •tta•f - yfftt •.CM Iw { .` �t \ I ya i•a { 1(�!gl- •."!-!• '2t. , a+r 1• 31a/{tto �. t� t4 YC. 'iK li ! yrlM f.= •W rl • � a ,��..�..F`� ;� •••' �•try— •1 �� gal .14 • t � `-�� -� \\� !11 cif . 1 j ttl�af t;i�•.� � �4+0 cN .aae Lti . k ai Mt+oft�• a - f N•n-ut C•• t 1 L taaaat•altr ! r•tsar w•;or Vol t ::i»�'•II��a•t�r t . -" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA - P.O-SOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE tip✓ FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540.2910 (714)962-2411 May 17, 1978 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Executive Committee SUBJECT: 1978-79 Budget Transmittal for: JOINT OPERATING FUND (Including Personnel Recommendations) and ' CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This year the Directors' Fiscal Policy Committee was established to assist and advise the staff in matters relative to the budgetary policies and procedures of the Boards and to review and counsel staff during formulation of the annual budgets. The Committee also studies other fiscal matters as directed-and submits appropriate recommendations to the Executive Committee for consideration. Since its appointment last July, the Committee has met fifteen times to review items within its purview. In addition to the ongoing budget work with staff, the Committee has submitted recommendations for revisions to the Districts' Procedures for Selection- of Professional Engineer- ing and Architectural Services and fdr Implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage. Both recommendations• have been adopted by the Boards of Directors. Transmitted herewith are the proposed Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets for the 1978-79 fiscal year. During the course of the budget process the Committee approved statements of departmental goals and objectives, which are set forth in the personnel recommendations, prior to the preparation of the preliminary budget documents. The enclosed joint works budgets have been prepared in accordance with the Fiscal Policy Committee Guidelines adopted by the Joint Boards. Inasmuch as these budgets are extremely complex and the Committee's time and other resources are limited, it is suggested that a totally unqualified endorsement by the Committee is not possible at this time. Rather, it is recommended that the budget be supported by the Executive Committee on the basis that it is a status quo projection of current operating procedures adjusted for inflation and to accommodate recent decisions of the Joint Boards including self-insurance in-house computer system, sludge dewatering to reduce hauling costs, etc. Memo to Executive Committee May 17, 1978 Page 2 • The proposed 1978-79 budget also•includes added costs to reflect regulatory requirements and increased operating costs .attributable to plant expansion. It is further recommended that the Committee continue to study various aspects of the budget once it is approved. In this way we will be able to continue to provide appropriate recommendations such as those previously adopted and on other matters like continued SCCWRP support, sludge marketing, etc. . If approved by the Boards the joint requirements will be incorporated as line items in the official budgets of the individual Districts to be con- sidered by the respective Boards at the regular August meeting. �J• i5liplloo Director James B. Sharp, Chairman Director Donald Holt Director Richard Olson Director Paul Ryckoff s COUNTY.SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE � FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 May 17, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Joint Boards of Directors SUBJECT: 1978-79 Budget Report for: JOINT OPERATING FUND (Including Personnel Recommendations) and CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND Transmitted herewith are the personnel recommendations and proposed budgets for the Joint Operating Fund (JO) and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) for the 1978-79 fiscal year. JO CORF Budgets The official budgets of the individual Districts will not be adopted until the August 9th meeting of the respective Boards of Directors. However, consideration of the joint Districts' budgetary requirements is the first step in the annual budget process. The JO budget funds the operation and maintenance of the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. Admin- istrative activities and R & D are also included in the Joint Operating Fund. The Districts share the cost of joint operations based on their annual gallonage flow through the treatment system. The CORF budget accounts for construction funding of the joint works facilities at the treatment plant sites. Construction costs are shared by the individual Districts based on a three year average of their gallonage flow and assessed valuation. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets do not, as such, have a tax rate levied. Following action by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting, the approved JO and CORF requirements will be incorporated into the respective operating and accumulated capital outlay fund budgets of the individual Districts. Each District's Board will then separately consider its 1978-79 budget (which includes the share of JO and CORF) at the August meeting of the Boards. Following adoption of each Districts' budget require- ments, the Board of Supervisors will then set the tax rates during the last week in August. Accounting Systems The Joint Operating account classifications conform to the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the State Controller. The Districts have expanded the Uniform System considerably to produce additional information deemed Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 2 desirable for administering and controlling financial activities. An integral part of the system is a comprehensive cost accounting program that maintains detailed records of maintenance and operational expenditures and assists the staff in effectively monitoring costs. The staff has recommended Uniform System revisions to the State Controller which would make it more adaptable and result in considerable accounting cost savings. Implementation of the revenue program will require modifications to the accounting systems in 1978-79. Installation of the in-house mini-computer recently approved by the Boards will accomodate the revisions and enable the staff to exercise even tighter reins on controllable expenditures. Funds are included in the JO and CORF budgets for the in-house system. Carry-Over During the current year, work on several projects and implementation of certain programs have been delayed for various reasons. For example, work on the waste activated sludge thickening study and polymer and toxicity studies and implementation of the Revenue Program due to changes in federal law to name just a few. Further, this year's budget provided for operation of the new 46 MGD activated sludge facility at Plant No. 1 starting last October. However, the contractor did not finish the project until January and we are just completing the shakedown. As a result of these delays and deferral of hiring new employees to fill authorized but vacant positions, coupled with efforts to control costs, there will be a substantial carry-over of unexpended funds from the 1977-78 fiscal year in the amount of $1 . 1 million which will be available to apply against the 1978-79 budgetary requirements. It is expected that full employment of authorized positions will be necessary in 1978-79 to fulfill departmental objectives and responsibilities. The major sources of carry-over will be from payroll savings and the odor control and chemical coagulents accounts due to delay of secondary start-up and completion of foul air scrubbing facilities; research and monitoring because of rescheduling of studies to next year; and from professional services because of postponement of revenue program implementation mentioned previously. Delay in the receipt of State and Federal grant reimbursement for operation of the JPL-ACTS facility will reduce the carry-over that would have otherw-l-se been available, to the amount set forth above. Some of the CORF carry-over is for similar reasons but the bulk of the $11 .3 million is from the advanced treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 which was awarded three months behind schedule and subsequently delayed further because of heavy rains, projects pending State and/or Federal approval or completion of studies, and the requirement to fully appropriate current funds for work that will sometimes be spread over several budget years. It should be pointed out that although the carry-over is reflected in the Joint Operating budget documents (primarily for Directors' information) , the funds are actually held in the Operating Fund of each individual District and applied to the following year's budget requirements for the respective Districts. This has the effect of reducing the net tax levy of w . Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 3 each District. Throughout the year, funds are transferred to JO only as needed to meet expenditures as they are incurred. Monies, while on deposit in the individual Districts' accounts, are invested in short-term governmental securities from which the Districts realize a substantial interest income annually. Similar procedures are followed with respect to funding of CORF from the individual Districts' Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds. Increased Joint Works Requirements Attributed to Federal and State Regulations and Inflationary Trends The increases in joint works budget- requirements for both capital (CORF) and operations (Joint Operating) are essentially attributable to federal and state regulations. CORF: To meet provisions of the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act PL92-500) and regulations promulgated pursuant to said Act by the Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State (SWRCB) and Regional (RWQCB) Water Quality Control Boards, the Districts will be required to expend $210,760,000 during the next six years for plant expansion to construct advanced (secondary) treatment works for total plant capacity and other needed facilities. A $32 million project for the first increment of this work, a 46 MGD activated sludge treatment facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1 is now complete and being phased into operation. The second increment of 75 MGD at Plant No. 2, totalling $50 million, is under way at Plant No. 2. Directors are aware that, largely through the efforts of our Districts, Congress amended PL92-500 in December, 1977, to allow the administrator of EPA to grant a waiver to the full secondary treatment requirements for ocean dischargers, provided certain conditions are met. However, the draft regulations implementing this provision, as presently written, make it virtually impossible for any agency to qualify. There is no scientific evidence to support a full secondary treatment requirement for deep water ocean dischargers. Our Directors and staff are, therefore, working vigorously to change the regulations before they are finalized to allow a responsible guideline consistent with environmental goals for granting waivers as intended by Cong.ress. If our application for a waiver is successful it will reduce the estimated capital expansion cost by $95 million. If unsuccessful , it will be necessary to proceed with plans to construct full secondary treatment capacity for 225 MGD in accordance with the cash flow schedule included with the CORF budget. Presently, EPA funds 75% of the cost of approved treatment projects and SWRCB 121%. The Districts pay the balance from local tax revenue. The state, however, is out of construction grant monies and has placed a bond proposition on the June ballot to underwrite further funding for its Clean Water Grant Program If the proposition fails the Districts' share would double. In that event the cash flow projection included with the CORF budget recommendations would have to be materially revised to reflect the additional local revenue that would have to be raised to offset the reduction of grant receipts. The outcome of the bond authorization will be known on June 7th and any appropriate changes to the CORF budget and income/expense projections can be made before the Boards consider adoption of their final budgets in August. ti f � Memo to Joint Boards �..f May 17, 1978 Page 4 JO: Over and above the capital cost, full secondary treatment will almost triple our on-going operating costs. The new facilities and expanded processes require additional personnel for operation and maintenance. There is a major impact on our demand for chemicals, repair parts, utilities and other items that is directly related to the advanced treatment facilities. NPDES permit requirements also add to our operating and monitoring costs. The more indirect costs of administrative, personnel , accounting. and procurement divisions must likewise increase to support the growing operational activities. Directors have also been advised of the Federal and State requirement for implementation of a User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery Revenue Program for funding maintenance and operating costs and to recover the Federal portion of grant monies allocable to the industrial community. In December the law was amended to allow ad valorem taxes for funding of maintenance and operation costs. Interpretation of the Act prior to the amendment required a user charge system for such costs. Although the change will result in a consider- able administrative overhead cost saving to the Districts by partially relieving the burden of levying use charges and billing users of Districts services, implementation of the Revenue Program by July, 1979, will be a monumental task, at best. Phase I (Revenue Program Document) which was commissioned by the Boards last year is near completion but it must be modified to incorporate the ad valorem provisions as now allowed. Phase II (detailed design and implementation) was recently approved by the Boards. However, upon recommendation of the SWRCB we are presently delaying the completion of Phase I and commencement of full work on Phase II to avoid duplication of effort pending issuance of new user charge regulations by EPA. The problem is further complicated by the Jarvis-Gann initiative. Its" passage would affect the Districts' user charge structure and its presence has influenced our decision to postpone completion of Phase I and 11 . It should be understood that the Revenue Program, once implemented, will have an impact on our staffing and administrative costs which, as yet, are indet- erminable. Budget estimates for 1978-79 have not addressed these requirements pending completion of the Program and resolution of the above issues. When finished, specific recommendations for additional personnel , equipment, office space requirements and other overhead items needed for compliance will be submitted to the Boards. At that time, consideration of a reallocation of budget appropriations may also be necessary to fund the effort. Directors are also well aware of past and current inflationary trends and rising labor costs recognized nationwide. We need not take further space here to acknowledge this fact. Suffice to say that although the inflation rate somewhat stabilized during the past year, it appears to be started on the upswing again. Because of the nature of the materials, supplies and services that the Districts procure the increases immediately affect our cost of operations. The impact of the above on the joint works requirements will be a $1 .3 million (20%) increase in the net Joint Operating budget over last year. Although the Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 5 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund requirements will increase $2.8 million (10%) in 1978-79, because of the Districts fiscal policies and long range planning, sufficient construction reserves have been accumulated for treatment plant expansion to enable a $2.2 million (27%) decrease in the amount to be raised by taxes for CORF. The CORF tax levy can be stabilized at the 1978-79 rate, or reduced, for the next several years, subject to the previously discussed availability of State construction grant monies and receipt of a waiver for secondary treatment. Summarized below are comparative figures for total joint requirements. It is anticipated that the eyuivalont combined tax rate required for all Districts to finance the joint works operations and plant expansion will decrease approximately 4.8 cents in 1978-79 based on an estimated 15% jump in assessed values. COMPARISON OF JOINT WORKS BUDGETS Equivalent Total Requirements* Available Funding* Raised by Taxes-` Tax Rate 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 J0 $ 7.3 $ 8.8 $ .9 $ 1.7 $ 6.4 $ 7.1 9.0 8.9G CORF 28.2 31_0 20.0 25.0 8.2 6'0 1 1 .9t 7.5t $35.5 $39.8 $20.9 $26.7 $14.6 $13.1 21.2t 16.4� *Millions of Dollars Impact of Jarvis-Gann The Jarvis-Gann tax limitation initiative which has been placed on the ballot for the June 6th election will , if passed: - Limit ad valorem property taxes to one percent 0%) of the full cash value of the property. .Require counties to levy the one-percent 0%) tax and "apportion it according to law to the districts (taxing agencies) within the counties." - Establish as a basis for "full cash value" the county assessor's appraised value as of March 1 , 1975 (property subsequently sold or improved would be reappraised) . Limit increases in fair market value to two percent (2%) per annum. - Become effective July 1 , 1978 (twenty-three days after adoption) The impact of the initiative on the Sanitation Districts can be summarized into three basic issues: Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 `�.•' Page 6 1 . Will it be necessary for the Districts to compile dual budgets for 1978-79? 2. What is the short-term financing alternative? 3. What is the long-term financing alternative? Following is a general discussion of each issue. 1 • 1978-79 Dual Budgeting: Although consideration of the joint works budgets for maintenance and operation (JO) and construction (CORF) of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities will take place at the regular June 14th meeting, as pointed out on page one said budgets do not, as such, levy a tax. Rather, following approval by the Joint Boaras, they are incorporated into- and become a line item of the official budget of each District to be considered in August. There would, therefore, be sufficient time to consider any revisions deemed necessary to the JO and CORF budgets and to prepare and review the individual District budgets after the outcome of the election is known. Because of the public health and safety nature of the Districts' activities and the regulatory requirements we face, it is unlikely, however, that JO and CORF budgets could be appreciably reduced regardless of the imposition of Jarvis-Gann. Instead, alternative funding as discussed below would become necessary. 2. Short-Term Financing Alternative: Although there are several unknowns with respect to the allocation of revenues collected under Jarvis-Gann to the various taxing agencies, the Districts could lose between $12 and $13 million in tax revenue in 1978-79. This represents a 58% overall reduction, ranging from 43% in District No. 7 to 66% in District No. 11 . The loss could be as much as 100% ($21 million) depending on the final determination as to how tax monies collected will be distributed. It will , therefore, require that the Districts develop alternative funding sources. Pursuant to the Boards' pay-as-you-go policy, each District has been accumulating capital funds to finance the local (District) share of advanced treatment facilities required by the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act as well as their respective master planned trunk sewers. A portion of the accumulated capital reserve funds could be reallocated in 1978-79 to temporarily provide operating and debt retirement funding until a permanent long-range funding alternative could be developed and implemented. Any construction reserves used in 1978-79 would have to be replaced in the following years. 3. Long-Term Financing Alternative: While the previously mentioned amendments allowing ad valorem taxes to satisfy Revenue Program financing of maintenance and operating costs were pending before Congress, the Districts were required to do a considerable amount of preliminary work on a user charge/ billing system. Therefore, the groundwork for developing an alternative revenue L.� system has been laid and, in the event the initiative passes and it becomes necessary to implement a separate user charge/billing system to fund Districts' activities, much of the initial work has already been completed. With an intensive (and expensive) effort, implementation of an alternative billing method could Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 7 be commenced within one to two years to replace the ad valorem tax system. The most cost-effective manner would be to place the use charge on the property tax bill for collection. We presently have statutory authority to do this and with the cooperation of County agencies it could be accomplished. It should be pointed out that any alternative billing system will require additional staffing and other resources that have not been included in the 1978-79 budgets. J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary JWS:dt f = COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC'I'S NOW,* OF ORANGE COUNTY 0 an ty1TATiph, ohs Yay U � � BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND f 1978-79 FISCAL YE AR SCHEDULE 1 i� JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW s SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED s ACTUAL EXPENDITURES B ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER (1) (2) (3) 4 (5) 6 Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over 1977-78* Budget or 1976-77 Expenditures or to Fiscal 1978-79 (Decrease) 1977-78 (Decrease) Year 1978-79 Salaries, Wages s Benefits $4,737,884 $5,644,483 $ 906,599 $3,607,413 $4,165,909 $ 558,496 $ 571,975 LESS Chargebacks to CORF S Dists. 1,000,000 1,000,000 -0- 1,011,945 1,119,500 107,555 (119,500) Net Salaries, Wages b Benefits Chargeable to JO $3.737,884 $4,644,483 $ 906,599 $2,595,468 $3,046,409 $ 450,941 $ 691,475 Materials, Supplies s Outside Services 953,000 1,076,000 123,000 741,030 1,217,766 476,736 (264,766) Odor Control E Chemical Coagulants 720,000 850,000 130,000 371,373 461,805 90,432 258,195 Research s Monitoring 288,000 . 247,000 (41,000) 211,766 122,462 (89,304) 165,538 Professional s Contract Services 757,000 544,000 (213,000) 215.367 308,136 92.769 448,864 Utilities 883,000 1,405,000 522,000 593,647 795,477 201,830 87,523 Total Joint Operating Expenses $7,338,884 $8,766,483 $1,427,599 $4,728,651 $5,952.055 $1,223,404 $1,386,829 Revenue and Offsets 521,000 614,000 93,000 174,961 217,547 42,586 303,453 Net Joint Operating $6,817,884 $8,152,483 $1 ,334.599 $4;553.690 $5,734,508 $1,180,818 $1,083,376 N . SCHEDULE 11 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND Fiscal Year 1978-79 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TAX LEVY GALLONAGE FLOWS FUNDING 1977-78 COMPARISON 1977-78 Estimated Estimated Amount to District Flows Estimated 1977-78 % District Estimated be Raised District Amount Raised No. (Past Year) Increase Flaws of Total Contribution Carryover by Taxes Contribution by Taxes 1 7,696 MG 153 MG 7,849 MG 11.33% $ 923,676 $ 125,455 $ 798,221 $ 789,511 $ 748,398 2 21,459 858 22,317 32.20 2,625,100 .337,363 2.287,737 2,123,089 2,003.917 3 21,560 431 21,991 31.73 2,586,783 348,413 2,238,370 2,192,631 2,068,691 5 3,852 77 3,929 5.67 462,246 63,052 399,194 396,801 376,151 6 4,o99 81 4,18o 6.03 491,595 66,628 424,967 419,300 398,575 7 4,383 87 4,470 6.45 525.835 70,636 455.199 444,526 420,421 it 4,478 89 4,567 6.59 537,248 71,829 465,419 452,026 426,269 TOTALS 67,527 1,776 MG 69,303 MG 100.00% $8,152,483 $1,083,376 $7,069,107 $6,817,884 $6,442,422 ' y JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 12, 1978 DEPARTMENT: SCHEDULE: I11 CLASSIFICATION: Summary PAGE NO. : 1 ACTUAL APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET 1977-78 BUDGET REMARKS 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) 1978-79 ;ALARIES, WAGES G BENEFITS Salaries Wages 4,033,805 3,594,061 4,811,001 The separate report on personnel recommendations details the projected gross salaries and wages assuming full employment of authorized positions. Several projects and implementation of certain programs budgeted for 77-78 have been delayed as previously reported to the Boards. Because of these delays and our ability to adjust plant operational modes, we have been able to avoid filling several budgeted positions thereby enabling substantial payroll savings this year that will be carried over and available to apply against the 78-79 requirements. It is anticipated that it will be necessary to fill these vacant positions in the coming year to effectively meet departmental responsibilities. Projections include anticipated adjustments for Supervisory and Administrative/Clerical employee groups pursuant to existing MOU's. However, we do not presently have an MOU with the Operational group and no allowance has been made in the budget for general salary or fringe benefit adjustments that may be forthcoming from any mid-year negotiated agreement with that group. in the event changes are authorized and any accumulated payroll savings are inadequate to fund the adjustments, it will be necessary to allocate funds from the unappro- priated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. Employee Benefits; Remarks above under Salaries and Wages re full employment of authorized positions, carry over and employee groups apply. Specific line item comments follow. Retirement (OCERS) 260,656 225,667 386,476 OCERS has advised that the retirement contribution rate may increase as much as 25% as a result of a change in actuarial assumptions and a rate evaluation. This increase is included in the budget. Workers' Compensation 125,162 115,389 112,420 Pursuant to the Boards' action implementing self- insurance for Workers' Compensation, State Compen- sation Insurance Fund coverage will be discontinued effective July 1st. This account includes anticipated loss experience based on the consultants' report and the estimated premium for excess loss coverage as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Self-insurance reserves will be included in the individual District Operating Fund budgets. U*ployment Insurance 61,333 13,324 38,487 Recent legislation requires the Districts to participate in the unemployment insurance program effective 1-1-78. Rates had not been determined at budget time last year but are now set at .8%. Group Medical Insurance 218,567 192,468 254,703 HMO plan premium increased this year and pursuant to the two-year agreement with employee groups, the added cost was borne by the Districts. JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR Di%WkICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 12, 1978 DEPARTMENT: SCHEDULE: III CLASSIFICATION: Summary PAGE NO, : 2 ACTUAL APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET 1977-78 BUDGET REMARKS 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) 1978-79 SALARIES, WAGES b BENEFITS (cont) Uniform Rental 38,361 25,000 41,396 Budget projection- is in accordance with employee unit agreements and allows for anticipated price increase when current three-year vendor contract expires. TOTAL PAYROLL 4,737,884 4,165,909 5,644,483 LESS: Chargebacks to Joint Works Capital Outlay and Indi- vidual Districts 1,000,000 1,119,500 1,000,000 Charged back to CORF through cost accounting system for work on treatment plants' capital expansion; and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion, and maintenance and repair of said systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective Districts. NET JO PAYROLL 3,737,884 3,046,409 4,644,483 Represents balance of payroll expenses chargeable to operation and maintenance of joint treatment and disposal works; and administrative and research activities. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES 6 SERVICES Gasoline, Oil 6 Fuel 70,000 T06,238 90,000 For both fixed and mobile equipment. Gross expense indicated with motor pool chargebacks reflected under revenue. Budget allocation reflects increased requirements for new equipment being placed into service and allows for moderate price increases. Current year expense includes initial P1-16 diesel fuel tank capping re initial start-up authorized by Boards. This fuel is for in-lieu primary, power purchase and is,therefore, being reclassified to the Utilities account for the 1978-79 budgetary appropriation. Insurance )45,000 102,899 76,000 Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-County travel policy, employee fidelity bond, boiler, fire, umbrella liability and anticipated primary liability claims. Directors are aware of the state of turmoil that the public sector insurance industry has experienced during the past several years and the resultant skyrocketing premium increases. There is a growing reluctance to underwrite coverage for governmental agencies. The Board has, therefore, adopted a self-insurance plan effective July 1st for Workers' Compensation (see above) and liability coverage. Pursuant to said plan (see separate Fiscal Policy Committee report) primary liability coverage (up to $300,000 per incident) will be self-insured by the Districts. r JOI IT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1973-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 12, 1978 DEPARTMENT: ' SCHEDULE: III CLASSIFICATION: Summary PAGE NO, : 3 ACTUAL APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET 1977-78 BUDGET REMARKS 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) 1978-79 Insurance - Remarks, cont'd. Other costs of self-insurance program are included under payroll and benefits, contractual services and professional services accounts. The self- insurance reserve will be carried in the individual District Operating Fund budgets. Office Expense 45,000 22,300 47,000 This account includes supplies and forms for all departments as well as postage. Although the current year expense is well within the budget the appro- priation has been slightly increased because of expected one-time costs next year to convert to an in-house computer system and implement the revenue program required by SWRCB and EPA. A postal rate increase is also pending. Operating Supplies: ,.,�lorine G Odor Control Chemicals 300,000 198.592 300,000 Budget allocation is primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Expenditures in 1978-79 will rise as a result of increased mitigation efforts Specifically, new foul air scrubbers at Plant No. 1 and additional prechlorination at both plants. Chemical Coagulants 420,000 263,213 550,000 Our NPDES permit requires extensive chemical treatment with polymers. The new activated sludge process at Plant No. 1 will substantially increase our solids treatment which utilizes these chemicals. The budget has, therefore, been increased to allow for the added volume. Other Operating Supplies 147,000 97,415 147,000 Supplies required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities and laboratory work. Recommended allocation reflects anticipated require- ments for operation of new facilities. Contractual Services 390,000 262,688 456,000 Includes trucking of solids, trash disposal and EDP. Budget has been raised to allow for increased sludge volume and unit cost as reported to the Boards in May. Appropriation also reflects addition of microfilm and word processing services to maximize filing and report writing effectiveness. Allocation also provides new items for independent claims adjusting services for workers' compensation and liability claims as required by self-insurance plan. EDP service bureau costs will continue throughout • the year until conversion to approved in-house system is completed, then be eliminated in the 1979-80 budget year. Piv,wodssional Services 367,000 45,448 88,000 includes General Counsel, audit by CPA and other miscellaneous accounting consulting, odor consultant, miscellaneous engineering services and new item for safety engineering consultant re loss control efforts relative to self-insurance program. Budget has been substantially reduced to reflect transfer of Phase II Revenue Program work from JO to CORF. JOINT ':CORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 12, 1978 DEPARTMENT: SCHEDULE: III CLASSIFICATION: Summary PAGE Nos : 4 ACTUAL APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET 1977-78 BUDGET REMARKS 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) 1978-79 Printing S Publications 41,000 29,928 50,000 Budget increased to reflect both increasing prices and continuing demand by public for information on Districts' activities. Staff continuing to utilize for reporting and analysis for maximum effectiveness. Cost will also increase somewhat for additional repro equipment necessary because of decentralization of certain administrative functions. Rents & Leases - Equipment 22,000 19,224 25,000 Primarily for heavy equipment required intermit- tently for major facilities repairs. Repairs s Maintenance 413,000 452,640 518,000 This item is of a hi.ghly contingent nature and must allow for unexpected major equipment failures and maintenance of new facilities that are con- tinually being placed into service as plant con- struction projects are completed. Over $30 million of new capital plant facilities are being phased into operation for which parts and supplies are charged to this account. Research 6 Monitoring 288,000 122,462 247,000 Includes Districts' contribution to So. Calif. Coastal Research Project being conducted under joint powers agreement, and required ocean mon- itoring. Also provides operational research and evaluation t4 develop optimum operating parameters. Work on several operational and industrial waste project studies budgeted for 77-78 has been delayed and the funds are being rebudgeted for next year. Travel, Meeting b Training 25,000 21,966 37,000 Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies require increased Board member and staff travel (ie., secondary treatment regulations). Districts also continue to emphasize ongoing training of employees as operation of facilities becomes more technical and complex. The budget has been increased to include an intensive training program for the Districts' key supervi- sory personnel to enhance their skills for effectively managing their respective divisions. Uncollectable Accounts 1,000 365 2,000 Bad debts. Utilities 883,000 795,477 1,405,000 Major item is purchased electrical power. Increas- ing costs plus the demand for full scale operation of sludge dewatering equipment and the new second- ary treatment plant will increase the electrical power budget to $1.1 million. Diesel fuel for in-lieu power generation has been added to this budget item to provide funds for fueling the two new 1500 H.P. P1-16 engines that can burn fuel at the rate of 900 g.p.d. The utilities account also includes purchase of natural gas which has been increased to provide for the addition of two new outfall booster engines, plant water and telephones and communications. The telephone budget has increased significantly over the past few years to accomodate additional staffing and � l t JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIOM 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 12, 1978 DEPARTMENT: SCHEDULE: III CLASSIFICATION: Summary PAGE NO@ : 5 ACTUAL APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET 1977-78 BUDGET REMARKS 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) 1978-79 Utilities - Remarks, cont'd. extensive inter-agency communication required as a result of federal and state regulations and resultant new mandated programs as well as increased activities from expanded operations (ie., procurement activities, etc.). Other Expenses 22,000 22,959 32,000 Items not chargeable elsewhere. Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 22,000 341,832 52,000 Account required by Uniform Accounting System. This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. Pursuant to approval by the Boards in 1976 the Districts transferred from PERS to OCERS. In accordance with the terms of the transfer the Districts were to assume any accumulated liability under OCERS in excess of funds transferred from PERS. The liability was unknown when budgets were adopted and, were, therefore, excluded with a provision that any liability could be funded by a budget transfer. The one-time charge has been paid from this account and a transfer approved by the Boards. Budget for next year has been increased based on past experience. TOTAL MATERIALS, SUPPLIES SERVICES 3,601,000 2,905,646. 4,122,000 TOTAL JO REQUIREMENTS 7,338,884 5,952,055 8,766,483 LESS: Revenues 521,000 217,547 614,000 Current year budget included anticipated grant reimbursement for JPL-ACTS which has not been received and is therefore rebudgeted for next year. Balance of the budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment process by-products, equipment and sampling chargebacks to individual Districts and miscellaneous items. NET JO REQUIREMENTS 6,817,884 5,734,508 8,152,483 L� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O.eO%8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92709 014194a2910 �. 014I992-2411 March 20, 1978 (Revised) MEMORANDUM TO: Boards of Directors SUBJECT: Summary Staff Report on Personnel Recommendations for 1978-79 INTRODUCTION Each year in conjunction with preparation of the Joint Operating Fund Budget recommendations, the staff conducts an extensive survey of anticipated personnel requirements. Projections are formulated for a five-year period with particular emphasis on the immediate fiscal period under consideration. Staff recommendations are considered by the Boards concurrently with the Joint Operating Budget and approved changes are incorporated into the current positions and salaries resolutions. RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY For 1978-79 the staff is recommending authorization for 7 new employees. These changes are more fully explained in the following report under each respective division. Employment in many of the new positions will be deferred until later in the fiscal year. The maximum salary cost (exclusive of benefits) of the changes is estimated to be $103,802, less than 3% of existing payroll. During the current fiscal year we have been able to adjust our mode of operation sufficiently to avoid filling.several authorized positions at a substantial payroll savings `..r estimated at $906,599• These funds will be available to apply against the 1978-79 budgetary requirements. It is anticipated that it will be necessary to fill these vacant positions in the coming year to effectively meet departmental responsibilities. The following summarizes the staff's personnel recommendations for fiscal year 1978-79: Recommended Net Salary Recommended Cost of Additions and Personnel Classifications Net Additions Adjustments Professional 1 $ 16,500 Technical 4 67,684 Skilled and Semi-Skilled 1 9,318 Clerical 1 10,300 ' 7 $103,802 Rising sludge volumes, increased industrial surveillance and operational monitoring, and added recordkeeping as a result of facilities expansion are the primary reasons that additional personnel are needed. With the exception of two positions which are required for additional recordkeeping for grant funded facilities already constructed or presently under contract, the staff is withholding specific recommendations at this time with regard to added clerical and accounting personnel in the Administrative Department and field personnel in the Industrial Waste Division until the UC/ICR Revenue Program is finished. Work on the program has been held in abeyance pending publication of new regulations promulgated as a result of the recent amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act which will allow use of ad valorem taxes for user charges. The final regulations will be issued in the near future and the Revenue Program can then be finalized. It is expected that implementation of the UC/ICR System will have a significant impact on personnel requirements in these categories. it is, therefore, inappropriate to consider changes in this regard until the program is completed sometime in the next several months. At that time, recommendations will be submitted on staffing for implementation of the program and authorized changes can be funded from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the respective Districts and/or payroll savings. Directors are further advised that in the event the Jarvis-Gann tax limitation initiative passes, a substantial increase in clerical personnel may be required to administer any alternative funding program that is adopted by the Boards. Y . GENERAL BACKGROUND Operation and maintenance of our continually expanding facilities constructed to handle increasing sewage flows and improved treatment processes, and the necessary technical and administrative support, are the primary factors that influence manpower requirements of the Districts. There are plans presently on the drawing boards, or projects under construction or recently completed, for well over $200,000,000 in capital expansion. During the 1978-79 fiscal year the total flow processed through the two treatment plants will increase to almost 70 billion gallons. Directors are well aware that regulatory agencies continue to become increasingly active in the field of water quality control. With the current environmental emphasis, requirements are being reviewed and changed by these bodies. The 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires full secondary treatment for all dischargers of municipal waste. The Boards have previously been advised that the 1977 Amendments allow the Administrator of EPA to grant a waiver to the secondary treatment requirements, provided certain conditions are met. However, the draft regulations implementing this provision, as presently written, would make it virtually impossible for any agency to qualify. Our staff is working vigorously to change the regulations before they are finalized to allow a responsible guideline consistent with environmental goals for granting of waivers as intended by Congress. If we are unsuccessful, it will be necessary to proceed with plans for full secondary treatment capacity at an added capital cost of $95,000,000 for facilities to bring treatment to 225 million gallons per day. Presently completed or under construction is 125 MGD of conventional activated sludge treatment works. The balance of the facilities would depend upon a decision relative to the JPL activated carbon treatment system. Thus, the effect on long-range personnel needs cannot be fully determined at this time. It should, therefore, be pointed out that accompanying projections could be materially affected by the extent of advanced treatment required and the processes utilized. Needless to say, the impact of Environmental Protection Agency edicts, State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulations, Regional Water Quality Control Board directives, California Environmental Quality Act requirements, Coastal Commission regulations, labor laws -- the list is endless -- on the administrative function has been almost overwhelming in terms of the paper work/red tape created, and the necessary technical and professional support required for compliance. NPDES permit requirements for the Districts, adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board in June, 1974, now require extensive chemical additions to the treatment process and a greatly expanded monitoring program. The RWQCB requires that we conduct new oceanographic studies in addition to the SCCWRP research work which has been under way for the past six years. The 1972 legislation also requires an intensified program of point source control for Industrial discharges to the system which was implemented last year. Implementation of the UC/ICR Revenue Program required by SWRCB and EPA will have a significant impact on staffing and overhead costs without improving the quality of the wastewater treatment one iota, as will Jarvis-Gann if It passes. Research is a vital activity that enables the Districts to evaluate improved methods of treatment and operation and provides the support for technological advances that effect maximum operational efficiency. The Districts' leadership in this area is well known. Our research laboratory, one of the finest of its type, has greatly enhanced our capabilities in this area. The building houses four separate laboratories: Marine Ecology Laboratory, Bacteriological Laboratory, Treatment Process Laboratory, and Industrial Waste Laboratory. We are continuing our extensive research work in each of these areas. Directors are cognizant of the cooperative effort between our Resources Management Center, NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of the California Institute of Technology, in developing the activated carbon treatment system which appears to offer a technological break- through in the treatment of wastewater and sludge. The pilot facility was constructed at Plant No. 2 under a $4.6 Step I grant from EPA and the State, and we are presently evaluating the feasibility of continued analytical work at this facility. In this regard it should be pointed out that no personnel appropriations have been included in the budget for this work. Should it be deemed desirable later to continue the evaluation period, temporary authorization for said personnel and a budget transfer will be necessary. All of these factors have a direct and significant influence on our manpower requirements and the organization and personnel complement of each department. Our projections are based on the best estimates of anticipated needs arising from these factors, and observe the District policy of continually attempting to improve admini- strative and operational effectiveness and efficiency. Previously reviewed statements of departmental aims and objectives have been prepared and are outlined in the following material. While the objectives are not limited to those specifically listed, and attempt is made to state generally those areas which most directly affect the manpower needs. Each department is endeavoring to implement improvements in all areas of assigned responsibility,.. ,..*, ..r -2- GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT Effective administration of the Districts requires constant monitoring of operating information and the current and . projected fiscal position. The requirements of the management information system place a continually increasing demand on the activities of the General Administrative and Finance Department. Clerical support must also be provided for staff and board activities, and the additional work load required as a result of regulatory agency activities. The following are general objectives for the next several years in this department, all of which are presently in varying stages of development and implementation. Much of-this work is directed toward conforming to statutory requirements and those of regulatory bodies, the Boards of Directors, the County Auditor, and our Independent CPA auditing firm. a) Continue to expand uniform system of accounting and management information system to maximize effectiveness. The System of Uniform Accounting for Waste Disposal Districts, as prescribed by the State Controller's office, became mandatory on July 1, 1970. The Districts have expanded the system beyond the requirements of the State Controller to provide additional information deemed necessary for effective management. Our system has been used as a model throughout the State. Revenue program requirements will require further modifications of the system. b) Phase 1 of the Revenue Program will address the impact on District EDP requirements. The Districts' consultant has indicated that it would be advantageous to consider in-house EDP capabilities. Pursuant to the Board direction it will be necessary to expand capabilities of the existing XCS System or install a new in-house system. c) Implement revenue program of user charges and industrial cost recovery required pursuant to 1972 and 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in connection with construction grant funding. d) Update and complete implementation of new centralized purchasing and warehousing policies and procedures. e) Complete implementation and centralization of personnel administration policies and procedures. f) Implement centralized filing. g) Conduct training programs for supervisors and foremen in the area of budgeting, cost control, supervision and basic source document input for cost accounting and management information system. h) Continue to expand program of public information and awareness. i) In conjunction with Fiscal Policy Committee, establish authorized limitation of expenditures within approved budgetary appropriation for each department/division. Support required of the Administrative and Finance Department brought about by the impacts and objectives described above reflect in the demand for additional on-going clerical and professional support summarized below for 1978-79: Earliest Effective Net Cost Recommendation Classification Date Positions Personnel or (Savings) The completion this year of $32 million activated sludge treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 and the $50 million ex- pansion at Plant No. 2, now underway, will require an additional Accountant, Range 1054C ($1373/1709), to handle the added fixed asset record- keeping Add: Accountant 10/06/78 1 1 $ 13,672.00 We expect to finalize the centralization of the person- nel administration activities this year. To complete the Personnel Division reorgani- zation it is recommended that the classification of Personnel Assistant, Range 1048A ($974/1213), and Personnel Aide, Range 1047A ($922/1149), be created to more appropriately reflect the responsibilities of this office. Existing employees will be re- classified to the new job titles and their current positions (Secretary I, Range 1048A, $974/1213 and Accounting Technician, Range 1047A, -3- . a Earliest Effective Net Cost Recommendation Classification Date Positions Personnel or (Savings) $922/1149) can, accordingly, be Add: Personnel Asst. .6/30/78 1 1 $ 13,589.00 deleted. There will be no Add: Personnel Aide 6/30/78 1 1 13,042.00 13,c,89.006dditional cost associated i � Delete: Secretary 1 6/30/78 (1) (1) (13,'589.00) with the change, Delete: Accounting Tech. 6/30/78 (1) (1) (13,042.00) With the rising volume of account- ing transactions brought about as a direct consequence of plant ex- pansion it will be necessary for existing accounting personnel to assume additional responsibilities. It is, therefore, recommended that one Accounting Technician position, Range 1047A ($922/1149), be deleted and upgraded to Intermediate Accounting Technician, Range 1048A, Add: Inter. Acctg. Tech. 6/30/78 1 1 $ 14,560.00 ($974/1213). Delete: Acctg. Tech. 6/30/78 (1) (1) (13,790.00) A Sr. Records Clerk position, Range 1044F ($809/1009), in the Purchasing/Warehousing Division is being assigned increased responsibility in the procurement function. To reflect this changing role it is recommended that the clas- sification of Purchasing Aide, Range 1047A ($922/1149), be created. The existing Sr. Records Clerk position should be retained in the organiza- tional structure to provide necessary clerical help to assist in the administration of the activated sludge facilities being constructed at Plant No. 2. Add: Purchasing Aide 10/06/78 1 1 $ 9,530.00 Sub-Totals - Administrative and Finance Department 2 2 $ 23,972.00 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Maintenance and Construction Divisions In addition to the continuing facilities expansion at the treatment plants, several Districts have Master Plan construction programs under way. As we continue to place collection and treatment facilities on the line, personnel are required to repair and maintain equipment, structures, and sewer lines in an operational condition. The general aims and objectives of the Maintenance Divisions are directed to this end: a) Continue to expand the preventative maintenance program to enable optimum equipment performance with a minimum of unscheduled equipment down time. b) Provide necessary emergency and standby equipment and training of personnel to enable operations to continue in the event of equipment failures or other emergencies, and for scheduled down time for major maintenance and repair jobs. c) Continue implementation of improved digester cleaning procedures which will provide increased safety by eliminating the need for men to enter the structures and yet allow the work to be expedited. d) Continue to work with the consulting,engineers in conducting periodic water-height surveys of the District trunks to aid in projecting future sewage flows and the hydraulic capacity requirements of the collection systems. e) Continue to work in the area of treatment plant and pump station site improvements to improve the appearance, including area lighting, landscaping, painting, paving and odor control measures. f) Continue to modify and relocate electrical equipment switch gear to eliminate potential equipment failures due to the presence of excessive water. Recommended changes for these divisions are as follows: -4- Earliest Effective Net Cost . Recommendation Classification Date Positions Personnel or (Savings) Plant Maintenance & Projects Division No additional personnel or changes requested for 1978-79 \"VI Collection Facilities Division During the next year we will place our 35th pump station Into service. In order to provide the proper maintenance supervisi3n for these stations It is recommended that two Pump Station Mechanic II's, Range 1050E ($1118/1392), be promoted Add: Lead Pump Station to the new classification of Mechanic 10/06/78 2 2 $ 12,722.00 Lead Pump Station Mechanic, Range 1051C ($1165/1451) a Delete: Pump Station 4.125% increase Mechanic II 10/06/78 (2) (2) (12,206.00) Mechanical Division A realignment of duties in our shop has resulted in one of our Mechanic 11's, Range 1050E (s1118/1392) performing full-time machinist's work. The staff, therefore, recom- mends creation of a Machinist classification, Range 1051C ($1165/1451), to reflect the nature of this employee's assignment. This represents Add: Machinist 10/06/78 1 1 $ 12,722.00 a 4.125% increase. Delete: Mechanic II 10/06/78 (1) (1) (12,206.00) Electrical Division With the expansion of treatment facilities the instrumentation equipment that monitors and controls our operations has become increasingly sophisti- cated, requiring a higher level of technically trained personnel and assignment of added employees .to handle the load. In order to properly direct the activities of the Instrumentation Group the staff feels a supervisory level position is now warranted. Further, a transfer and upgrading of several classifications within the division is suggested. To accomplish the necessary changes It is recommended that the classi- fication of Instrumentation Supervisor, Range 1056F ($1563/1947), be established to replace the classi- fication of Sr. Instrumentation Foreman, Range 1055E ($1480/1843), representing a 5.5% increase; and that one each Lead Instrumentation Technician, Range 1053A ($1283/1596), and Instru- mentation Technician II, Range Add: Instr. Supv 6/30/78 1 1 $ 23,358.00 1052D ($1239/1543), be added to Delete: Sr. Instr. Foreman 6/30/78 (1) (1) (22,110.00) in lieu of an Electrical Techni- Add: Lead Instr. Tech. 10/06/78 1 1 13,999.00 ,,�clan .II, Range 1052D ($1239/1543), Add: Instr. Tech. II 6/30/78 1 1 18,512.00 and an Instrumentation Technician Delete: Elect. Tech. II 6/30/78 (1) (1) (18,512.00) I, Range 1050E ($118/1392) Delete: Instr. Tech. 1 10/06/78 (1) (1) (12,206.00) Sub-Totals - Maintenance and Construction Division -0- -0- $ 4,073.00 -5- c . Operations & Laboratory and Research Division In addition to our ongoing research activities, these divisions, of course, have responsibility for the overall treatment function and necessary controls that must be established to assure that treatment requirements and dis- charge standards are met. Their aims and objectives are to this end and, in effect, all other departments provide support activities toward the Operations Division's goals. a) Improve overall treatment with particular emphasis on floatable solids removal by: Extending pilot studies on fine screening of final effluent; expanding full plant scale operation to centrifuge total volume of digester flows; and implement use of chemical flocculents in several of the existing unit processes. b) Stabilize operating parameters and procedures for new secondary treatment facilities. c) An intensified effort for the control of odors at both plants will be continued by studying the effectiveness and cost of various levels of prechlorination and of controlling odors in contained areas, such as grit chambers and headworks, by chemical means. d) Intensify efforts to beneficially recycle all by-products resulting from treatment processes, in conjunction with the Districts' Resources Management Center. e) Modify mode of operation to comply with NPDES permit requirements. f) Continue development of analysis program to assure compliance with NPDES permit and industrial source control ordinances. Recommended changes for these divisions are as follows: Earliest Effective Net Cost __...... Recommendation Classification Date Positions Personnel or (Savings) Operations Division The 75 MGD Secondary Treatment Installation at Plant No. 2 will have computerized process control. The staff is recommending that the position of Operations Assistant Engineer, Range 1055F ($1480/1843) be upgraded to Associate Engineer, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) to oversee this function as well as certain research work in the Resources Add: Assoc Engr 6-30-78 1 1 $ 23,202.00 Management Center. Delete: Ass't Engr 6-30-78 (1) (1) ( 20,374.00) With the startup of the activated sludge facilities our solids handling volume has increased 33% and we have expanded the solids dewatering program. It is, therefore, necessary to request two Plant Operator 1 positions, Range 1048E ($1002/1248), to absorb the added work load. Add: Plant Oper 1 10-06-78 2 2 $ 19,954.00 Staff is recommending that a Control Center Clerk 11, Range 1046G (5910/1134) be esta- blished to recognize the increased control center monitoring tasks.and complete the career ladder positioning in this division. The Clerk II will require operator cert- ification consistent with other classifi- cations in the division and will not require additional personnel as one Control Center Add: Control Center Clerk I, Range 1043 ($737/917) will be Clerk 11 4-06-79 1 1 $ 2,813.00 deleted to provide for the position. Delete: Control Center Clerk 1 4-06-79 (1) (1) { 2,275.00) -6- Earliest Effective Net Cost .Recommendation Classification Date Positions Personnel or (Savings) Laboratory Research Division It is necessary to request that the new classification of Laboratory Analyst III, Range 1048E ($1002/1248) be established to provide the technical level required to perform lab analyses required for NPDES, industrial waste and the new secondary treatment facility; and one Part-time Technician (maximum hourly rate - $7.50) for analytical work relative to solids dewatering studies to be conducted during Add: Lab Anal. III 6-30-78 2 2 $ 31,866.00 the year. Add: Part-time Tech. 6-30-78 1 1 15,600.00 Sub-Totals - Operations and Laboratory & Research Divisions :5 5 $ 70,786.00 Sub-Totals - Maintenance and Operations Department 5 5 $ 74,859.00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The primary responsibility of this department remains in the area of administration and inspection of plant and district construction contracts. Capital expenditures for new facilities run over $200,000,000 during the next five years. Administration of the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and connection permits are assigned to this department. In this regard, the general objectives of the department are as follows: a) Continue evaluation of new treatment processes and beneficial recycling of all by-products in the Resources Management Center, emphasizing research and development of sludge dewatering techniques. b) Continue to administer all plant and district construction contracts including supervision and inspection. c) Continue to implement and enforce the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and administer the issuance of industrial waste and connection permits, including inspection and collection of waste flow samples. Institute point source control program as required by new regulations. Also provide the assurance that the safety and integrity of the Districts' collection system is being maintained. d) Keep records and record drawings, district boundary and annexation maps, trunk plan and profile drawings, right of way and easement data, shop drawings, equipment log and data sheets, catalogs and miscellaneous engineering administration files. e) Process State and Federal grant application records and data and prepare required manuals; other agency questionnaires; general drafting and preparation of contract cost data for fixed asset accounting. Earliest Effective Net Cost Recommendation Classification Date Positions Personnel or (Savings) Our Resources Management Center will be faced with additional operational research and process control work as a result of bringing the advanced treatment facilities in line. It is, therefore, requested that an Engineering Aide I, Range 1048A (974/1213) Add: Environmental position be upgraded to the classification of Specialist 6-30-78 1 1 $ 18,387.00 Environmental Specialist, Range 1053G Delete: Engineering ($1336/1662). Aide 1 6-30-78 (1) (1) ( 13,416.00) Sub-Total Engineering Department -0- -0- $ 4,971.00 Total - All Departments 7 7 $103,802.00 -7- 3/20/78 Schedule A SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS 1978/79 FISCAL YEAR PROJECTED PERSONNEL(') PROJECTED SALARY COSTS(2) Recommended Changes Authorized Total Personnel Est'd Cost of Est'd Salary Projection Total Add or Delete Existing Recommended Recommended for Existing Salary Budget Dept. or Div. Positions Personnel Personnel 1978-79 Changes Personnel 1978-79 Admin. & Finance 2 2 36 38 $ 23,972 $ 823,549 $ 847,521 Plant Mtce. 6 Projects -0- -0- 31 31 -0- 409,116 409,116 Coll. Facl. -0- -0- 21 21 516 354,817 355,333 Mechanical -0- -0- 36 36 516 576,381 576,897 00 Electrical -0- -0- 21 21 3,041 412,432 415,473 Operations 2 2 50 52 23,320 903,300 926,620 Laboratory 6 Research 3 3 19 22 47,466 323,178 370,644 Engineering -0- -0- 38 38 4,971 904,426 909,397 Non-Departmental -0- -0- 2 2 -0- -0- (3) TOTALS - JAO 7 7 254 261 $103,802 $4,707,199 $4,811,001 NOTE: (1) Does not include 11 authorized temporary positions for completion of Phase Ila Revenue Program work. (2) Payroll estimates assume all positions filled in accordance with personnel recommendations and include any anticipated salary adjustments based on current three-year agreements with certain employee organizations. Includes estimated salary for Phase Ila Revenue Program work. (3) Allocated 3/2D/78 • ` Schedule B SUMMARY OF FIVE-YEAR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 1978/79 1979/80 1980/81 1981/82/83 Total Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Years Five Years Department of Division Personnel Cost Personnel Cost Personnel Cost Personnel Cost Personnel Cost Administrative & Finance 2 $23,972 4 $ 53,352 4 $ 53,675 8 $112,121 18 $243,120 Plant Mtce. & Projects -0- -0- 1 17,046 1 15,080 1 10,733 3 42,859 Collection Facilities -0- 516 1 15,392 1 15,392 1 13,988 3 45,288 Mechanical _0_ 516 1 15,392 2 25,396 1 13,988 4 55,292 Electrical -0- 3,041 1 17,649 2 32,438 1 17,046 4 70,174 Operations 2 23,320 2 25,064 2 34,092 8 120,180 14 202,656 Laboratory 3 47,466 1 15,933 1 15,288 1 14,175 6 92,862 Engineering -0- 4,971 4 73,215 2 36,774 2 46,124 8 161,084 TOTALS - JAO 7 $103,802 15 $233,043 15 $228,135 23 $348,355 60 $913,335 Not adjusted for inflationary trends • 3/20/78 Schedule C COMPARISON OF PROJECTED AND ACTUAL PERSONNEL REQUESTS 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR Actual Projected Last Year Recommendations Increase for 1978-79 1978-79 (Savings) PERSONNEL COST PERSONNEL COST PERSONNEL COST Administrative t Finance 5 $ 64,085 2 $ 239972* (3) $( 40vll3) Plant and Projects 1 162058 —0— —0— (1) ( 169 058) Collection Facilities -0- -0- -0- 516 —0— 516 Mechanical 3 409955 —0— 516 (3) ( 409439) Electrical 2 379576 —0— 3,041 (2) C 34,535) Operations 2 269124 2 23,320 —0— 2,804) Laboratory 1 162058 3 47,466 2 319408 gineering 4 693,639 —0— 4,97l* (4) 649668) Non-Departmental -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- TOTALS - JAO 18 $270s495 7 $ 103,802 (11) $( 1662693) * Does not allow for added personnel needed for revenue program implementation. _10- iv a A e•'1 I V-� - N•n f'1 Aao N 1 c a L A N ff rn mw rmo y c i \ w 3 UL In o N r a -, ,n Z n 1 x A N cq C 2 :• O aTO O z A Q Z w O a x A N m 2 2 rl A r W x r -•1 �r va --1 D--� � •9 D o m A m W C r CD x Z.9 SA Pt :1 � p m m — 1^ cx as-n 3 —m C p m 'o O -a A Cl)4- m- _ �o r -1 D SN om rW X LO G� Cam- M to x C M m z <A D A z (A A CAa m m - Z IF m A m rn N -� - -c �o r Inrn a A -Si c A N A rn Co .'D I/f r m a -.1 0 C � O .X w ` : z C O r--4 OO A Z 'O @s �40 N.• C7 l00 co r > 0 D Imo= c�o c r v' to " O z_ rn So-Z1 -alm m� v C>rn)= A�w N - o m a no o w �O A D 7o r a� W 00 o CA +N o v `n o v co C) o A o m .D -'1 mV' m A rA o M M C °° va -x1 O7P4 -t m� w A a r Ir 7O C� rl:i w 4 rn'^ m m 2 A oA xm M oz R,-n j m �o oou CA a A m m c x H 3 m ' O � A N CD 3 3 m n m> v N m M '�1 -1 N m CA v m a - A "L r O9 m -i -N1 i z _1 m O O m:0 z z a Z(AZ c�rnm m moo+ rm„o x rn 70 TI a)Ill O r m .o O p Z N n G� C•f M G7 N N C:Z 7D m p mX mr= i A m x z T m n zm7o c1Y•� ., mil zm� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -iTAT.To� °Swlttna a� o o r Bl1 GET RECOMMENDA70HIS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND JOINT WORKS-CONSTRUCTION I978-79 FISCAL YEAR ! Schedule A Page I 5/05/78 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARATIVE DATA FOR JOINT WORKS EXPANSION Fiscal Year 1978-79 1978-79 Requirements 1977-78 Comparative Amount Equity Cash Estimated Federal/State Amounts To Be Amount Raised District Percent Requirements Carry-Over Participation Raised by Taxes Requirements By Taxes 1 5.09 S 2,820,627 $ 1 ,026,844 $ 1 ,249,511 $ 544,272 $ 2,566,564 $ 736,532 2 29.82 9,253,146 3,370,531 4,099.057 1 ,783,558 8,424,534 2,455,785 3 33.07 10,261 ,621 3,735,004 4,545,802 1,980,815 9,335,524 2,722,579 5 6.84 2,122,452 760,542 940,226 421 ,684 1 ,900,95C 551 ,391 6 5.84 1,812,152 658,986 802,766 350,400 1 ,647,114 480,169 7 8.45 2,622,035 954,626 1 ,161 ,538 505,871 2,386,058 697,587 11 6.89 2,137,967 777,467 947,100 413,400 1 ,943,256 555,957 TOTALS 100.00 $31,030,000 $11,284,000 $13,746,000 $6,000,000 $28,204,000 $8,200,000 1976-77 Comparative Amount $21 ,944,000 $7,200,000 1975-76 Comparative Amount $26,033,000 $2,500,000 1974-75 Comparative Amount $33,424,600 $2,500,000 Schedule B Page 2 5/04/78 7 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Fiscal Year 197 -79 A. GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS I. 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 a. Construction, Supervision L Inspection $ 1,400,000 b. Oxygen Generation b Dissolution 8,360,000 c. Electrical Reliability 1,800,000 d. Operations Center 500,000 e. Major Facilities 30 300 000 - $ 2,3 0,D00 Less: Deferred 1979-80-81 Budget Allocation 22,881,OOo $19,479,000 2. Solids Handling Facilities at Plant No. 2 $12,620,000 Less: Deferred 1979-80 Budget Allocation 11,600,000 1,020,000 3. Facilities Plan, EIS/EIR 700,000 4. Hydraulic Reliability at Plant No. 2 2,000,000 5. Revenue Program (Partially Grant Funded) 251,000 SUBTOTAL GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS $23,450,000 B. NON-GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS 1. New G Rebudgeted Major Projects a. Additional Solids Dewatering Facilities $ 500,000 b. Additional Warehouse Facilities 150,000 c. Gas Engines With Gear Drives at Rothrock Outfall Booster Station 600,000 d. Ellis Avenue Pumping Station 250,000 e. Hydraulic Reliability at Plant No. 1 1,100,000 f. Digester Cleaning Beds at Plant No. 1 350,000 g. Additions to RMC, Personnel, IW Annex, Operators' Lunch Room 200,000 h. Refurbish Trickling Filters at Plant No. 1 75,000 i. Gas System and Mixing Compressors for Digesters at Plants 1 b 2 240,000 j. Solids Disposal E Transportation Facilities 500,000 $3,965,000 2. New b Rebudgeted Minor Projects - a. Reclamation Plant No. 1 (See Schedule C) 450,000 b. Plant No. 2 (See Schedule D) 410,000 c. Equipment (See Schedule E) 805,000 1,665,000 3. Special Projects 1. Solids Treatment 500,000 2. Centrate Treatment 200,000 3. Screenings b Scum Disposal 200,000 4. Ocean Waiver Application 50,000 950,000 SUB-TOTAL NON-GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS $ 6,580,000 C. RESERVE FOR FUTURE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS I,000,OOO TOTAL JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS $31,030,000 D. AVAILABLE FUNDING 1. Estimated Carry-Over from 1977-78 $11,284,000 a./ 2. Federal and State Construction Grants 13,746,000 $25,030,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING NET AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES FOR CORF $ 6,000,000 Schedule C Page 3 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLV;NG FUND NEW & REBUDGETED MINOR PROJECTS - RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 Fiscal Year 197 -79 1 . Scum Pump and appurtenant pipe for clarifiers 3 & 4 $ 15,000 2. Remodel digester No. 6 cover 20,000 3. Remodel sludge storage hoppers 40,000 4. Improve grit removal and handling facilities & headworks 50,000 5. Chemical feed pumps for boilers 4,o00 6. Remodel and expand hot water loop to utilize engine waste heat for digester heating 15,000 7. Digester hot water controls for digesters nos. 5, 6, 7 & 8 MOD 8. Liquid level and gas pressure switches for digesters 9,000 9. Return sludge pumps for clarifier no. 5 (2 required) 25,000 10. Density meter for activated sludge plant 3,500 11 . Automatic gate operators at trickling filter pump station 25,000 12. Additional automatic gate openers at metering and diversion structure 25,000 13. Foam control for activated sludge plant (effluent channels) 1 ,500 14. Plant water pump 40,000 15. Safety stairways and remodeling at Shops "A" & "B" 15,000 16. Relocate Shop "A" air compressor 3,000 17. Replace existing auto shop vehicle hoist with hoist with greater capacity to accommodate new equipment 10,000 18. Electrical keyed interlocks for emergency power interconnections 5,000 19. Control Center headworks instrumentation - replace and upgrade 5,000 20. Headworks instrumentation and controls - replace and upgrade 10,000 21 . Landscaping improvements 25,000 22. Card-key security for cesspool trunk disposal area 16,000 23. Miscellaneous paving 30,000 24. Miscellaneous small improvement projects 502000 $450,000 Schedule D Page 4 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND NEW & REDUDGETED MINOR PROJECTS - TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 -- Fiscal Year - 197 -79 1 . New air compressor $ 80,000 2. Pre-chlorination facilities 75,000 3. Remodel restroom facilities and additions to plant office 25,000 4. Rehabilitate incinerator No. 2 30,000 5. Rehabilitate drive unit for clarifier "K" 2,500 6. Chemical feed pumps for boiler 5,000 7. Heat exchanger and recirculation pumps for digesters "A" & "B" 20,000 8. Relocate modulator valves for digesters "C" & "D" 3,000 9. Replace gas storage sphere pressure transmitter 1 ,500 10. Raw sludge recorders and timers for clarifiers "A" thru "F" 8,000 11 . Foul air scrubber controls - remodel & replace 2,000 12. Replace sludge flow recorders for digester "D" & "E" 3,000 13. ' Landscaping improvements 25,000 14. Miscellaneous paving 25,000 15. Miscellaneous small improvement projects 105,000 $41o,000 Schedule E 5/04/78 Page 5 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND EQUIPMENT REQLIREMENTS 1978-79 Fiscal Year Coll. Lab E Equipment Total Admin. Plt. tltce. Fac. Mech. Elect. Oper. Res. Engr. Trucks & Vehicles $190,977 $16,245 $12,000 $140,552 $ 7,200 $ 8,480 $ 6,500 Other Mobile Equipment 102,700 3,180 38,408 41 ,206 8,638 $ 8,088 3,180 Machine Equipment & Tools 41 ,058 4,954 895 30,242 4,867 100 Communications Equipment 16,062 4,200 11500 3,922 4,840 1,600 Instrumentation & Testing Equipment 103,481 10,388 3,429 23,689 65,975 Safety & Traffic Control Equipment 2,800 2,800 Office Equipment & Furniture 347,922 $292,008 928 1 ,328 928 3,337 1,36E 10,729 37,300 Totals $805,000 $252,008 $25,307 $56,831 $224,816 $31 ,393 $40,781 $88,464 $45,400 Rebudgeted Items Included in Above (Purchased but not Delivered) $137,491 -0- $ 7,765 $38,408 $ 73,752 $ 9,478 $ 8,088 -0- -0- Net New Funding $667,509 $292,008 $17,542 $18,423 $151 ,064 $21 ,915 $32,693 $88,464 $45,400 i CAPITAL OUTLAY RLVOLVING FUND 5/04/78 PRELIMINARY CASH FLDW PROJECTIONS FISCAL YLAAS 1978-19 THROUGH 1983-84 Estimated Expended Project Through Cost 6�30-78 1978-79 197940 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 Carryover from Previous Year $11,284,000 $33,940,000 $28,257,000 $21.792.000 $13,238,000 $10.588,000 Reserve 32,550,000, Revenue Federal 6 State Grants 13,746,000 18,752,000 30,585.000 36,066,000 29,565.000 17,960,000 Tax Levy 6,000,000 6,OOD,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,titimo0 6.000,000 Total Funds Available $63,580,000 $58,692,000 $64,842,000 $63.858.000 $48,803,000 $34,548.000 Expenditure Grant Funded Projects 1. Step I Facilities Plan, EIS 6 JPL $ 5,000,000 $ 4,300,000 $ 700,000 2• 75 MGD Secondary Treatment (a) Flood Wall 6 Site Imp. 2,600,000 2.600,000 (b) Oxygen Equipment 8,360,000 3,000,000 $ 4,360,000 $ 1,000,000 (c) Elect. Reliability 3,000.000 1,200,000 1,800,000 (d) Operations Center 1,100,000 600,000 50D,000 - (e) Major Facilities 31,000,000 700,000 14,760,000 14,040,000 1,500,000 (f) Constr. Supr. 6 Insp. 1,500,000 100,000 600,000 700,000 100,000 Sub-Total $47,560,OOD 3. Additional Solids Facilities (a) Engineering - Design 600,000 600,000 (b) Construction 11,720,000 300,000 3,700,000 5,000,000 $ 2,720,000 (c) Constr. Supr. 6 Insp. 300,000 125,000 125,000 50,000 Sub-Total $12,620,000 4. 50 MGD of Improved Treatment (Phase 11) (a) Engineering - Design 2,000,000 1,000,000 750,000 250,000 `.+ (b) Construction 47,000,000 13,000,000 14,000,000 $17,000,000 $ 3,000,000 (c) Cosntr. Supr. 6 Insp. T,000,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 100,000 Sub-Total $50,000,000 5. 50 MGD of Improved Treatment (Phase III) (a) Engineering - Design 1,750,000 1.000,000 500,000 250,000 (b) Construction 42,500,000 18.000,000 13,000,000 11,500,000 (c) Const. Supr. 6 Insp. _750,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 Sub-Total $45,000,000 6. Hydraulic Reliability 6 Additional Capacity (a) Engineering - Design 1,100,000 800,000 300,000 (b) Construction 21.000,000 700.000 10,000,000 7,000.000 3,300,000 (c) Constr. Supr. It Insp. 400,000 IO,000 200,000 125,000 65,000 Sub-Total $22,500,000 7. Solids Processing 6 Disp. (a) Engineering - Design 500,000 500,000 (b) Construction 9,300.000 6,000,000 3,300,000 (c) Constr. Supr. 6 Insp. 200,000 125,000 75.000 Sub-Total $10,000,000 Total Grant-Funded $192. 0,000 $ 9,500,000 23,0 0,000 25, 35,000 9, 0,000 i, Non-Grant Funded Projects Major 6 Special Projects 18,415,000 4,915.000 3,500,000 2,500,000 2,500.000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Minor Projects 6 Equipment 9,165,000 1,665,000 1.500,000 1,500,000 11500,000 1,500.000 1,500.000 Total Non-Grant Funded $27,580,000 $ 000 $ 6,580,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 4,000,000 S 4,000_000 S 4,000,000 $ 4.000,000 `4/' Total Project Expenditures $220,260,000 $ 9,500,000 $29,640,000 $30,435,000 S43,050,000 $50o620,000 $38,215,000 $18,800,000 Balance to Carryover to next Fiscal Year $33,940,000 S28,257,000 $21,792,000 $13,238,000 $10,588.000 $15.748,000 t RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JUNE 141 1978 - 7:30 P.M. y •JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 WARRANT N0. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41580 Aladdin Litho and Aft, Business Cards $ 14.31 �. 41581 .Almquist Tool & Equipment, Tools 117.40 41582 American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts 1,233.46 41583 Aquatic Center, Cylinder Tests 18.50 41584 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies 11161.01 41585 Banning Battery Company, Batteries 88.34 41586 Barksdale' Controls Division, Electrical Supplies 128.08 41587 Beckman Instruments, Electrodes 513.74 41588 Bessen & Associates, Pump Parts 780.12 41589 Bird Machine, Equipment Rental 42823.00 41590 Business Publisher, Inc. , Subscription 10.00 41591 CS Company, Freight 38.00 41592 Cal-Glass for Research, Inc. , Lab Supplies 63.65 ' 41593 Cal-State Seal Company, Pump Parts 59.06 41594 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services 885.00 41595 Chemical Engineering, Engineering 'Manual 15.00 41596 Chevron USA, Inc. , Gasoline 12584.08 41597 Clark Dye Hardware, Small Hardware 54.60 41598 William N. Clarke, Travel Expense Reimbursement 166.89 41599 Coast Nut & Bolt, Small Hardware ' 37.10 41600 College Lumber Company, Inc. , Lumber 29.09 41601 Barber Coleman, Digester Parts 26.61 41602 Commercial Envelope & Printing, Envelopes 76.85 41603 Compressor Products, Compressor Parts and Repairs 617.57 41604 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies 422.81 41605 Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine 1,873.65 41606 Control 'Specialists, Inc. , Pump Parts 6.71 41607 Costa Mesa'Auto Parts,~Inc. , Truck Parts 190.81 41608 Costa Mesa County Water District, Water 6.00 .41609 County of Orange, Fire Hose 375.00 41610 Charles P. Crowley Company, Odor Control Parts 124.02 41611 Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water 46.00 41612 DME, Inc. , Exhaust Assembly 93.22 41613 Daniels Tire Service, Tires 326.35 41614 Deco, Electrical Supplies 161.65 41615 Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill 140.00 41616 Documents & Publications, Safety Orders 115.31 41617 Jim Elo, Employee ?Mileage 28.02 41618 Enchanter, Inc. , Ocean 'Monitoring 32000.00 41619 Lorren Etienne, Travel Expense Reimbursement 213.82 41620 Fischer & Porter Company, Freight 23.70 41621 Fisher Scientific Company, Lab Supplies 193.60 41622 Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware 173.89 41623 City of Fountain Valley, Water 450.20 41624 Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Fuel Injector Tests 60.00 41625 Georgia Pacific, Lumber 708.93 41626 General Telephone Company, Phone 249.45 41627 Golden State Fish Hatchery, Lab Research Specimens 15.00 41628 Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal 52692.50 41629 Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Impellers 990.64 41630 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease 11638.46 41631 Hi Flex International, Hardware 109.50 41632 Honeywell, Inc. , Strip Charts 46.11 41633 Howard Supply Company, Pipe Fittings 1,332.54 "A-1" AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-1" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 91 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41634 City of Huntington Beach, Water $ 914.9E 41635 Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment; Rentals 155..55 41636 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water 2.75 41637 Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Flanges 74.20 41638 King Bearing, Inc. , Pump Parts .423.04 41639 Kleen-Line Corporation, Cleaning Supplies 274.03 41640 Knox Industrial Supplies, Wire Solder 114.17 41641 LBWS, Inc. , Demurrage ' 48.51 41642 L & G Sporting Goods, Life Jackets 76.29 41643 L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Rental 13303.84 41644 Lancaster Upholstery, Upholstery Repairs 76.50 41645 Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts 290.76 41646 Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing 44.10 41647 Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Boots 22.19 41648 Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lighting Supplies 343.11 41649 McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Freight 18.60 41650 Paul A. Mitchell, Travel Expense Reimbursement 76.86 41651 Nalco Chemical Company, Freight 51.55 . 41652 National Chemsearch, Chain 120.57 41653 Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies 73.20 41654 City of Newport Beach, Water 32.73 41655 M. C. Nottingham Company, Inc. , Sewer and Road Repairs 31366.00 41656 Noyes Data Corporation, Publications 35.90 41657 0'Rings, Inc. , 0'Rings s=.` - '25.20 41658 Oda Nursery, Inc. , Plants 265.00 41659 The Ohmart Corporation, Temperature Controls 401.44� 41660 Orange County Fire Protection, Fire Safety Equipment 111.86 41661 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Timing Unit 139.79 41662 Pacific Telephone Company, Phone 54.62 41663 Pacific Thermal, Temperature Control 194.92 41664 Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts 11592.83 41665 M. C. Patten Corporation, Pressure Gauge 120.85 41666 Pickwick Paper Products, Cleaning Supplies 537.10 41667 City of Placentia, Street Repairs 2,738.19 41668 Harold Primrose, Sampling Ice 31.80 41669 Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal 83.70 41670 The Register, Employment Ads 501.21 41671 Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum 197.19 41672 Robbins $ Meyers, Pump Parts 210732.09 41673 Robertshaw Controls Company, Pressure Gauge 247.55 41674 Ruffs- Saw Service, Saw Service 64.67 41675 SBC, Inc., Pump Rental 263.96 41676 Scientific Products, Lab Supplies 11083.70 41677 Shamrock Supply, Small Tools 89.08 41678 Shepherd Machinery Company, Tractor Parts 642.64 41679 Sheraton-Twin Towers, Lodging 195.50 41680 Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies 245.01 41681 Solar Turbin' International, Generator Parts 12221.98 41682 Southern California Edison Company, Power 83,270.43 41683 South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings, 70.14 41684 Southern California Water Company, Water 6.26 41685 Stang Hydronics, Inc. , Pump Parts 1.9124.40 41686 Superior Concrete Products, Tubing 462.37 41687 The Suppliers, Ladder 36.75 41688 Surveyors Service Company, Drafting Manual 22.02 41689 TFI Building Materials, Pipe Fittings 603.98 "A-211 AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-2" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT "� 41690 Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Lock Service 50.88 41691 Travel Buffs Air Fare. 368.00 . 41692 Truck Auto Supply Company, Truck Parts 308.62 41693 Tubesales, Tubing 122.59 _ 41694 United Parcel Service, UPS 14.47 41695 VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage 174.56 41696 Valley Cities Supply Company, Small Hardware 404.16 41697 . Valvate Associates, Valves 354.89 41698 VIVR Scientific, Lab Supplies 142.01 41699 John R. Waples, Odor Control Consultant 205.00 41700 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts 594.71 41701 Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies 1,927.36 41702 Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction 239.81 41703 Everett H. York Company, Engine' Parts 345.98 41704 Donald Winn, Travel Expense Reimbursement 209.75 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $144,129.78 "A-311 AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "A-3" ,JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41564 A & T Construction Company, Inc., Retention J-13-1 1,289.50 41565 Artesia Impldments & Parts Company, Heavy -Equipment 3,869.00 41566 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical 52121.92 -41567 Butier Engineering, .Inc. , Contract Mgmt. P2-23 16,304.00 41568 Eastman, Inc. , Office Furniture 213.41 41569 Fabco, Drapery Installation 586.91 41570 Howard Supply Company, Cabinet 237.44 41571 International Business-Machines, IBM Typewriters 2,461.32 41572 Johnson Steel Corporation, Retention J-6-1E 2,430.00 41573 C. H. Leavell & Company, Contract P2-23-3 177,474.38 41574 Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-1 and P2-23-5 1172299.84 41575 Perkin Elmer Corporation, Lab Equipment 477.99 41576 H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2-23-6 45,606.60 41577 Southern California Testing; Lab, Testing P2-23-1 and P2-23-•5 322.50 41578 Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-23-1 and P2-23-5 224,35 41579 VWR Scientific, Lab Equipment 194.78 TOTAL CORF $374,113.94 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $518,243.72 "A-4" AGENDA ITEM #B - ALL DISTRICTS "A-4" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 91 1978 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND i9ARRANT NO. XN FAVOR OF OUNT 41559 Local Agency Formation Commission, Annexation 31 25.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND $ 25.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 41560 F. B. Cook Corporation, Retention 3-1R-3 $ 5,364.74 TOTAL DISTRICT NO.-3 OPERATING FUND . DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF A14OUNT 41561 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering 3-22-1 $:: 3,867.06 41562 Kordick $ Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 106,693.48 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND $110,560.54 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 $1152925.28 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND . WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 41563 Dale St. Charles, Refund Tract 8934 $ 532.84 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND $ 532.84 "B" AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL. DISTRICTS "B" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 , WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41747 Addison-Wesley Publishing, Engineering Publications $ 27.8,0 41748 Allied Colloids, Polymer 29,640.0 41749 Allied Supply Company, Valves 1,607.77 41750 Jeff Ambrose, Reimburse Vehicle Damages 179.63 41751 American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts 2,554.04 41752 American Lock & Supply,**Inc. , Padlocks 264.53 41753 Anaheim Builders Supply, Inc. , Building Materials 34.11 41754 Void .00 41755 Arbor Nursery, Trees 2,510.08 41756 Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Hardware 626.85 41757 John A. Artukovich, Contract 2-5 Emergency Sewer Repairs 126.1075.62 41758 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies 22670.45 41759 BC Industrial Supply, Rope 94.13 41760 Hilary Baker, Employee Mileage 17.70 41761 Gary Bankston, Reimburse Vehicle Damages 104.10 41762 Beckman Instruments, Instruction Course Fee 300.00 41763 Paul Bergeron, Reimburse. Vehicle Damages 60.00 41764 Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete Mix 451.84 41765 Bonded Pavers, Asphalt Mix 31300.00 41766 W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage 20.55 '41767 Butier Engineering, Contract Management 2-5 41814.00 41768 C $ R Reconditioning Company, Equipment Repair 620.00 41769 CS Company, Plug Valve 416.96 41770 CWPCA, Conference Fee 100.00 41771 California Fasteners Supply, Small Hardware 124.00 41772 California Lithograph Corporation, Booklets . 578.7E 41773 Bruce Chapman, Reimburse Vehicle Damages 71.G�qwJ 41774 Chevron USA, Inc., Engine Oil 30103.37 41775 Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware 276.34 41776 Coast Communications, Comm6nication Equipment 82.36 41777 College Lumber Company, Inc. , Lumber 50.76 41778 Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine 3,330.93 41779 Controlco, Valve Parts 183.19 41780 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc. , Truck Parts 218.89 41781 Costa Mesa County Water District, Water 6.00 41782 Mr. Crane, Equipment Rental 383.50 41783 Larry Curti Truck & Equipment, Equipment Rental 70.00 41784 Curry & Sorensen, Inc. , Cement 240.70 41785 Daily Pilot, Employment Ad 9.11 41786 C. R. Davis Supply Company, Poly Sheeting 531.11 41787 Deco, Electrical Supplies 259.30 41788 Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill 95.00 41789 Donovan Construction, Blower 53.00 41790 Eastman, Inc. , Office Supplies 442.15 41791 Engineers Sales-Service Company, Pump 22883.41 41792 Ensign Products Company, Oil 586.04 41793 Void .00 41794 Filter Supply Company, Engine Parts 31.00 41795 Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts S,003.29 41796 Flexible Municipal Sales, Auger 85.58 41797 John Flores, Reimburse Vehicle Damages 48.00 41798 Flo-Systems, Pump Parts 843 A,40) 41799 Foremost Threaded Products, Small Tools 24.48 41800 Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies and Processing 215.46 41801 A. F. Frey, Employee Mileage 48.78 "C-In AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 232 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41802 City of Fullerton, Water 24.35 41803 General Telephone Company, Phone 72672.38 41804 Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal 102708.75 41805 W. W. Grainger, Inc. , Small Tool 41.45 41806 Harbor Radiator, Radiator Repair 16.50 41807 Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Building Materials 141.72 41808 Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Pump Parts 826.60 41809 Hi Flex International, Hose Installation 23.71 41810 Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires 443.53 41811 Howard Supply Company, Pump Parts 416.64 41812 Industrial Asphalt, Asphalt Mix 11.25 41813 Inland Empire Equipment Company, Equipment Parts 45.09 41814 Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pump Parts 50.35 41815 Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Small Hardware 99.77 41816 Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Hardware 138.33 41817 Gale V.- Kelly, Reimburse Vehicle Damages 40.00 41818 King Bearing, Inc. , Pump Parts 529.68 41819 K1een-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies 62.07 41820 Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware 264.01 41821 LA Chemical, Weed Killer 474.35 41822 LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies 424.15 41823 L & N Uniform.. Supply Company, Uniform F Towel Rental 12292.89 .41824 Laursen Color Lab, Photo Service 107.02 41825 Lewco Electric Company, Starter Repair 319.94 41826 Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Gloves and Raingear 486.01 41827 Liftco, Equipment Repair 90.00 41828 Lowry $ Associates, 2-5 Emergency Sewer Repair 2,117.84 41829 A. J. Lynch Company, Plastic Buckets 205.59 41830 Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies 105.94 41831 Metal Finishing, Engineering Magazine Subscription 12.00 41832 Mine Safety Appliances Company, Hose 18.29 41833 Motorola, Inc. , Communications Repair 346.94 41834 National Chemsearch, Odor Control 947.37 41835 National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware 63.34 41836 Nelson-Dunn, Inc. , Pump Parts 134.32 41837 Newark Electronics, Electrical *Supplies 85.02 41838 City of Newport Beach, Water 10.17 41839 Nolex Corporation, Paper Supplies 90.04 41840 Orange County Door Closer Service, Door Repair 30.00 41841 Orco Tool $ Equipment, Hardware 70.60 41842 Oxygen Service, Demurrage 23.40 41843 Pacific Pumping Company, Pump ls606.96 41844 Pacific Telephone Company, Phone 176.00 41845 Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts ls008.23 41846 M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges 358.97 41847 Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Mower Parts 24.33 41848 Pennwalt Corporation, Bowl Shell Extension 455.76 41849 Pickwick Paper Products, Brooms 72.88 41850 Postmaster, Postage 500.00 41851 Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice 15.90 41852 Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage 42.90 41853 Republic Engines, Engine Parts 146.81 41854 Safety Research Corporation, Paint Supplies 90.95 41855 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair 444.70 41856 Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies 42.35 41857 Scientific Products, Lab Supplies 190.65 "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALLDISTRICTS "C-2" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 23,. 1978 ' WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41858 Sears Roebuck and Company, Hardware and Tools $ 299.4A 41859 Shaw Airmotive, Air Service 51.(S, 41860 Shepherd Machinery Company, Pump 195.04 41861 Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies 538.77 41862 Smith Electric Motors, Pump and Motor Repair 596.98 41863 Southern California Edison Company, Power 56,766.10 41864 South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings 421.69 41865 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, .Conf. Expense 558.50 • 41866 Southern California Gas Company, Gas 2,834.22 41867 Southern Counties Oil Company, Diesel Fuel 4,489.41 41868 Southwest Plywood and Lumber, Wood Tape 64.87 41869 Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water '6.75 41870 C. D. Spracher Company, Inc. , Engine Parts 76.94 41871 Super Chem Corporation, Janitorial Supplies 1,006.47 41872 The Suppliers, Rope Slings 28.01 41873 J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash 594.53 41874 Jean Taisne, Reimburse Vehicle Damages 340.00 41875 Taylor-Dunn, Small Tools 153.77 41876 Travel Buffs, Air Fare 777.00 41877 Truck Auto Supply, Inc.., Truck Parts 435.87 41878 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. , Special* Gases 117.89 .41879 Tustin Water Works, Water 14.56 41880 Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline 38.49 41881 United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges 31.54 41882 U. S. Government, Publications 20.50 41883 Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools 269.01c 41884 VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage 463. 41885 Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings 274.18 41886 Valve and Primer Corporation, Valve Parts 225.11 41887 VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies 53.85 41888 Vehicle Spring Service, Truck Repair 262.40 41889 Water Pollution Control Federation, Conference Fee 80.00 41890 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts 645.00 41891 Western Salt Company, Lab Salt 126.94 41892 Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies 366.12 41893 James Wybenga, Employee Mileage 20.25 41894 Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction 2,045.63 41895 George Yardley Associates, Pump Parts 163.91 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $306,012.40 "C-3" AGENDA ITEM ##8 - ALL- DISTRICTS "C-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41730 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services $ 327.50 `' 41731 Daily Pilot, Legal Ad A-089 and A-091 20.84 41732 Eastman, Inc. , Office Equipment 144.12 41733 City of Fountain Valley, Plan Check Fee J-13-2 100.00 41734 Global Engineering, P2-23-6 Specs Refund 3.71 41735 Howard Supply Company, Pipe Threader 12507.59 41736 Jet Line Engineering, Power Control Unit 215.00 41737 C. H. Leavell & Company, P2-23-3 Stop Notice Release 4,108.20 41738 Pascal $ Ludwig, Contract P2-23-1 - 19,537.36 41739 Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Lawnmower 772r53 41740 Production Steel Company, Inc., Digester Hanger 1714SS.00 41741 The Register, Legal Ads E-093, PW-066, and J-13-2 257.00 41742 Santa Ana Dodge, Dodge Pick-Ups 13,882.77 41743 Skipper and Company, Stop Notice Release PW-055 11,893.75 41744 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-3 310.83 41745 The Suppliers, Tool Box 365.57 41746 Western Wholesale Company, Vacuum and Edger 484.95 TOTAL CORF $ 712386.72 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 377,399.12 "C-411 AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS 11C-4" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCU,1ULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY .WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 41713 John A. Artukovich & Sons, Contract 2-5R $ •186,367.50 41714 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe, Permit 2-19-2 300.00 4171S Lowry & Associates, Emergency Repair 2-SR 8,670.00 41716 The Register, Legal Ads 2-19 and 2-20 217.83 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO F1JND $ 195,5SS.33 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCLP,RILATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 41717 Osborne Laboratories, Inc. , Pipe Tests 3-22 $ 53600.00 41718 The Register, .Legal 3-13-1 112.90 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND $ S,712.90 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AP40UNT 41719 State of California, Annex .66 Processing Fee .$ 95.00 41720 Clifford A. Forkert, Aerial ?flaps 3,082.20 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND $ 3,177.20 DISTRICT NO.-7 FIXED •OBLIGATION WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF M-40UNT 41721 City of Anaheim, 27th JOS Payment $ 13952.25 41722 City of Buena Park, 27th JOS Payment 120.87 41723 City of Fullerton, 27th JOS Payment 12952.25 41724 Garden Grove Sanitary District, 27th JOS Payment 302.25 41725 City of LaHabra, 27th JOS Payment 483.62 41726 City of Orange, 27th JOS Payment 1,843.38 41727 City of Placentia, 27th JOS Payment 302.25 41728 City of Santa Ana, 27th JOS Payment 53543.13 TOTAL DISTRICT NO, F/O $ 122500.00 "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-111 .INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 s DISTRICT NO. 7 i FACILITIES REVOLVING WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF MOUNT 41729 The Koll Company, Refund Permit Overpayment ,$ 35.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND $ 35.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 15,712.20 "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-211 JOINT OPERATING CI.AIPIS PAID JUNE 6, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS A>+IOUNT ' 41923 Air California, Air Fare 37.7.70 41924 Almquist Tool ; Equipment, Small Tools 27.35 4192S Aljac Supply Company, Hardware 266.59`•• 141926 American Lock & Sun_nly, Inc. , Padlocks 108.92 .41927 The Anchor Packing Company, Packing Materials 204.76 '.41928 Anixter Pruzan; Electrical Supplies 47.69 41929 Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies 1,472.18 41930 BC Industrial Supply, Nylon Rope 387.64 41931 Baker Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental 98.75 41932 Beckman Instruments, Buffer 77.40 41933 Blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt }Iaterials 11.52 41934 CS Company, Freight Charges 17.88 41935 Cal-Glass for Research, Inc. , Lab Supplies 84.21 41936 Calif. Assoc. of San. Agencies, CASA Conference Fee 50.00 41937 Calif. Cities Water Company, !dater 20.95 41938 Cal State university, Fullerton, Training Fee 40.00 41939 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services 210.00 41940 Chevron USA, Inc. , Gasoline 3,310.02 41941 College Lumber Company, Inc. , Building Materials 387.67 41942 Compressor Products, Engine Valve Repair and Hardware 667.82 41943 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies 73.78 41944 Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine 62037.31 4194S Controlco, Valve Parts 22.51 41946 Control Specialists, Inc. , Pump Parts 7.87 41947 Cooper Energy Services, Engine Tests 662.50 41948 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc. , Truck Parts 103.02 41949 Costa Mesa County !later District, Water 246.82 41950 Culligan Deionized !Pater Service, Lab Water 46.00 41951 Deco, Electrical Supplies 921.94 41952 De Guelle & Sons Glass Company, Glass 17.04 41953 Derby's Topsoil, Sand & Gravel 360.40 41954 Dickson Appliance -and Air Conditioning, Air Conditioning Repair 97.50 41955 Eastman, Inc. , Office Supplies 570.62 41956 Ecco Equipment Corporation, Equipment Rental 23164.00 41957 Eureka Bearing Supply, Gaskets 169.64 41958 Monica Farris, Employee Mileage 10.80 41959 Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts 742.30 41960 Foremost Threaded Products, Hardware 141.85 41961 The Foxboro Company, Digester Temperature Controls 30228.00 41962 General Telephone Company, Phone 191.90 41963 Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal 6,170.10 41964 Harbor Radiator, Radiator Repair 100.96 41965 Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal 13,720.00 41966 Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies 505.71 41967 Hines Wholesale Nurseries, Plants 42.40 41968 Honeywell, Inc. , Temperature Controls 56.35 41969 City of. Huntington Beach, Water 8.82 41970 ICN Life Sciences Group, Water Sampling 20.00 41971 Industrial Asphalt, Paving Mix 11.07 41972 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water 2.75 41973 King Bearing, Inc. , Pump Parts 186.06 41974 Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies 360.96 - 4197S Knox Industrial Supplies, Vinyl }lose and Tank Sprayer 584.7010.E 41976 LBWS, Inc. , Demurrage 350.S9 41977 L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform and Towel Rental 1,203.10 41978 Lanco Engine Services, Inc. , Engine Parts 175.49 "E-l`' AGENDA ITGH #8 - ALL DISTRICTS "E-�" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 6, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT23803 41979 Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing 159.32 V✓ `�41980 Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Rain Gear 26. 41981 A. J. Lynch Company, Freight Charges 61.8 0 0 85 41982 Martec Reproductions, Inc. , Printing 2, . . f 41983 Charles Meriam Company, Instrumentation Supplies 85.36 41984 t1ine Safety Appliances Company, Safety Equipment 216.24 ' 41985 Montgomery Brothers, 801.62 Heater .86 441 41986 E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers 20.57 86 41987 Motorola, Inc. , Communications Equipment 2000 41988 National Safety Council, Safety Conference 117.74 41989 Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies 1 5. 41990 City of Newport Beach, Water .39 41991 The Ohmart Corporation, Cell Repair 41.09 41992 Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Hardware 65.82 41993 Pacific Scientific Company, Safety Equipment 44.53 41994 Pacific Telephone Company, Phone 160.30 41995 Pacific Thermal Sales, Inc. , Caustic Tank 166.79 41996 M. C. Patten Corporation, Testing Equipment 88.11 41997 Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Mower Parts 28.52 41998 Pickwick Paper Products, Painting Supplies 50.18 41999 Porter. Boiler Service, Inc. , Gasket 71.26 42000 Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice 15.90 42001 Printec Corporation, Engineering Supplies 390.50 42002 The Pryor Giggey Company, Building Materials 546.54 42003 The Register, Employment Ad- 179.19 42004 Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts 2206 20 42005 Rucker Company, Clyinder Parts . 42006 Scientific Products, Lab Supplies 477.59 42007 Sears, Roebuck and Company, Small Tools 32.75 42008 Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies 261.34 42009 Southern California Edison, Power 43,852.35 42010 South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings 82.58 42011 Southern California Water Company, Water 6.00 42012 Stang Hydronics, Inc. , Freight Charges 42.89 42013 Starow Steel, Steel 12890.34 42014 Sunshine Tree Farms, Trees 51.41 42015 The Suppliers, Hardware 11115.48 42016 TFI Building Materials, Pipe Fittings 122.83 42017 TIS Tropical Fish, Specimen Food 37.10 42018 Taylor Instrument Company, Testing Equipment 498.69 42019 Truck Auto Supply, Inc. , Truck Parts 658.32 42020 U. S. Divers Company, Safety Equipment Repairs 271.35 42021 United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges 43.83 42022 USC School of Public Administration, Pianagement Training Seminar 650.00 42023 Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings 779.85 42024 VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies 263.59 42025 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts 1,279.38 42026 Western Electronic Corporation, Transformer 43.13 42027 Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Fees 4,148.50 42028 Worthington Service Corporation, Pump Parts 11,641.70 42029 James Wybcnga, Employee Mileage 3 .16 0 42030 George Yardley Associates, Gauge 42031 James B. Sharp, Travel Expense 193.77 42032 Donald Winn, Travel Expense 299.90 TOTAL, JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 112,867.39 "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #8 - ALL DISTRICTS 'IF-911 JOINT DIST1tIas CLAIMS PAID JUNE 6, 1978 ' . WARRANT NO. -CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41912 John Carollo Engineers; P1-16 Instruction Program $ 1,611.65 41913 John Carollo Engineers/Greeley Hansen, P2-23 Construction Serv. 269495.66 41914 J.B. Gilbert & Associates, Engr. Services Waiver Application 3,271.63 41915 Hallmark Business Interiors, IW Partitions 29262.19 41916 LBWS, Inc. , Jib Crane 445.20 41917 C. H. Leavell $ Company, Contract P2-23z3 269,206.60 41918 James M. Montgomery, Engineering I-lR 2277S.00 41919 Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 231,1SS.35 41920 Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Testing Equipment 491.84 41921 H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2-23-6 266,589.90 41922 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-2.3-3, P2-23-5 227.19 TOTAL CORF $ 804,S32.21 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 917,399.60 "E-�" AGENDA I TES; #3 - ALL DISTRICTS "E-�" 'INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 61 1978 -DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT .41905 John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. , Contract 2-SR 49,698.00 41906 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-19, 2-20 227.08 41907 The Register, Legal Ad 2-19 122.71 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND $ S0,047.79 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCU1.4ULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF MOUNT 4k908 Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 $ 242,446.22 41909 Osborne Laboratories, Inc. , Testing 3-22-1 42252.50 41910 Pascal $ Ludwig, Inc., Contract 3-22-1 299,268.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND $ S45,966.72 DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF A14OUNT 41911 City of La Habra, 9/74 Permit Refund $ 237.50 TOTAL DISTRICT NO.. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND $ 237.50 • TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 S462204.22 "F" AGENDA ITES1 #8 - ALL DIST9ICTS "F" RESOLUTION N0. 78-104 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS _FOR MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 12 JOB NO. PW-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 3, S, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 12 JOB NO. PW-062 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 12 21 31 S, 6, 7 and ll .of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents' this day submitted to the Boards of Directors .by the Districts' Chief Engineer, for MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-062, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boardsand the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of.Directors. - PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "G" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) - ALL DISTRICTS "G" RESOLUTION NO. 78-105 P'1 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS-NOS. 1, 21 33 5, 6, 7 AND 11 .OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, .AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066 • The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to PRODUCTION STEEL CO., INC. for MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No: PW-066 be awarded to Production Steel-Co. , Inc. in the total amount of $16,135.00, in accordance with the terms of.their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 31 52 62 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. 1� "H" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" +� •; j� 1 H D y L n 1 L y iy June 1, 1978 11:00A.M. S }IEET JOB NO. _PW-066 PROJECT TITLE MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER AT OUTLET PORT A RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION Fabrication and installation of modified sludge hopper outlet port close-out assembly. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 20,000.00 BUDGET. -AMOUNT $ REMARKS CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Production Steel Co. , Inc. ' Gardena, CA $16,135.00 - r 2. Instrumentation and Mechanical Systems,-1Inc. $161854 .00 Fullerton, CA JI 3 . 4. I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to • Production Steel Co. , Inc. of Gardena, CA for the bid price of $16,135.00, as the lowest and best bid. Donald Bogart Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation. Ra wis, Chief Engineer "I" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) - ALL DISTRICTS "I" B I D T A B U L A T I O N May 30, 1978 11 :00 a.m. S H E E T JOB NO. E-n93 PROJECT TITLE Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment • Plant #2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of 1 Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist, 1 Cable Reel; 1 Pendant Control Station; all hoist accessories specified. , ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 6,000.00 BUDGET. AMOUNT $ REMARKS • CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID • 1. James P. Kinney Co. Los Angeles, CA $5,950.55* 2. McLaughlin Indust. Distr. Inc. Pico Rivera, CA . $6,058.74* .3. E. A. Key Co. - Los Angeles, CA $8,194 .86 4. 5. *Total bid price includes all applicable sales taxes and freight costs to Districts. I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to James P. Kinney Company of Los Angeles, CA for the bid price of $5,950.55, as the lowest and best bid. Donald Bogart Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation. William N. Clarke, Superintendent "J" AGENDA I TEM #9 t i) - ,ALL DISTRICTS "J" COUNTY SA14 I TAT I ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 812. 7 - 1081411 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, _CALIFORNIA 92708 ' CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0: C-06-1073-140 C.O. NO. 2 �! CONTRACTOR: I{. C. Smith Construction Co. DATE May 30, 1978 JOB: MAJOR FACIL11'IES 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No, 2 - Job No. P2-23-6 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The contractor has requested time extensions because of inclement weather and resulting unfavorable site conditions which delayed the installation of the deep well dewatering system and sheet piling algng the 8411 RCP effluent line. The equipment required to install the above systems could not function under the unfavorable mud and unstable work areas. The contractor commenced operations as soon as the areas could sustain the necessary. equipment. 12-29-77 to 1-22-78 2S calendar days 1--23-78 to 2-19-78 28 calendar days 2-20-78 to 3-19-78 28 calendar days Total time extension this change order - 81 calendar days . Contract Time Adjustments Original contract date December 29, 1977 Original contract time 1000 calendar days Original completion date September 23, 1980 . Time extension this C.O. 81 calendar days Total time extension 81 calendar days Revised contract time 1081 calendar days Revised completion date December 13, 1980 Original Contract Price $ 30p67Op000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 30,670,000.00 Board authorization date: June 14, 1978 Approved: • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California .py gy Contractor •Chief Engineer "K" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) - ALL DISTRICTS "K" RESOLUTION NO. 78-111-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 2-6R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, 'CALIFORNIAy APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 2-6R WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lowry and Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for the Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract �1 No. 2-6R. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE -AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Lowry and Associates for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum fee not to exceed $8,400.00; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "L" AGENDA ITEM #9(L) - DISTRICT 2 "L" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLI S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0. NA Coo* N 0. CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. DATE June 5, 1978 JOB: Orange Sub-Trunk, Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R • Amount of this Change Order (ADO) OYN � $ 3,380.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following .additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contractor to replace asphalt bike .trail damaged under emergency temporary bypass work. 5,200 sq. ft. @ $. 65 $3,380. 00 TOTAL ADD $3,380.00 The Contractor is hereby granted a time extension of 6. calendar days for the above work. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date April 18, 1978 Original Contract Time 30 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 17, 1978 Time Extension This Change Order 6 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 6 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 36 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date May 23, 1978 Original Contract Price $ 276,100.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) f%009 $ 3,380.00 Amended Contract Price $ 279.480.00 Board authorization date: June 14, 1978 Approved: COU14TY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF . JOI3N A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. Orange County, California .By By Contractor Chief Engineer lima AGENDA ITEM #9(M) - DISTRICT 2 ""!" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. NA • C.O. N0. 2 CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICI1 SONS, INC. DATE June 5, 1978 JOB: Orange Sub--Trunk, Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (ZEIiCiJD) $_ 2 .300. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions-- to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Dismantle manholes and fill with drilling mud the existing sewer and temporary bypass to lessen future liabilities of the abandoned temporary crossing. $2,300. 00 TOTAL ADD $2,300.00 The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of , time of 9 calendar days to perform the above work. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME -Original Contract Date April 18, 1978 . Original Contract Time 30 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 17, 1978 Time Extension This Change Order 9 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 15 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 45 Calendar Days -Revised Completion Date June 11 197.8 Original Contract Price $ 276, 100. 00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 3,380. 00 This Change (ADD) `�� `�} $ 2,300. 00 Amended Contract Price .$_281,780.00 Board authorization date: June 14, 1978 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. •By BY.....__ter. rrrrr�i Contractor Chief Engineer " 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) - DISTRICT 2 "N" RESOLUTION NO. 78-112-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-SR AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ORANGE SUB-TRUNK SANTA.ANA RIVER CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 2-5R, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor,John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, on the 1st of June, 1978; and, Section 2. That by letter, Lowry and Associates; District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa :Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 18th of April, 1978; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. lion AGENDA ITEM ##9(o) —DISTRICT 2 110" "EXHIBIT A" PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: To: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection Example: in the city of Orange, near the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) cotin4 and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District' s annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: - Property Owner (If more than one, *attach separate listing) Name: -- Address: C ' City & State: 2, '2' Telephone No. : l- 0 o Gross Acreage: f (to nearest hundredth) Assessed Value (I more than one parcel, attach separate listing) d r Number of Registered Voters: Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report if prepared) . Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. Signature of Property Owner(s) 4,d-rt�--o G ^ "P" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) DISTRICT 2 "P" JN 7770-101 Tract No. 10011 ®sun LAND PLANNING CIVIL L CIVIL ENGINEERING H W E LAND SURVEYING May 3, 1978 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 P.O. Box 8i27 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Honorable Members: It is hereby directed that the territory generally described as: within the City of Yorba Linda, Northerly of the (future) intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Village Center Drive and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's Annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: Property Owners: Names: Warmington Development, Inc. The Baldwin Company 1641 Langley Avenue 16841 Hale Avenue Irvine, California 92714 Irvine, California 92714 (714) 557-5511 (714) 540-8300 Gross Acreage: 165.676 Acres Assessed Value: $362,750 (1977-1978) Number of Registered Voters: None Also enclosed is the initial study form required by the local agency formation conniission. Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the district's processing fee is included herewith. �!!1 INGTON DEVFL�OPMII�rr, INC. IM BALUVIN COMPANY v 17752 SKYPARK BOULEVARD,SUITE 150,IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92714 (714) 751-2B80 "Q" AGENDA ITEM #9(T) - DISTRICT 2 "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 78-116-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WES-rMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS` OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1, AND APPROVING SAID PROJECT The $oard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That said project is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be'authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section S. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "R" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICT 3 "R" "EXHIBIT A" , PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: ' To: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection - Example: in the city of Orange, near the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) in the City of Orange at the Northwest corner of Kennymead Street and Randall Street, and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District' s annexation procedures, be annexed to the District.. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: Prope ty _Owner (If more than one, attach separate listing) r''1 Name: Edgewater Develoloment ComRan_v Address: 16592 Hale Ave. City & State: Irvine , Calif. Telephone No. : (714) 549-8869 Gross Acreage: 5. 60 Acres' (to nearest hundredth) Assessed Value (If more than one parcel, attach separate listing) Number of Registered Voters: O Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report if prepared) . Also a check in the amount of $500. 00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. Signature of Property Owner(s) EDGEW Ronald P. Merickel "S" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) DISTRICT 7 HS11. �-, (EXCERPTED FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS) 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION - A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra- tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. r�*1 "T" AGENDA ITEM #14 - ALL DISTRICTS "T" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O-BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540.2910 (714)962.2411 June 7, 1978 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts FROM: General Counsel RE: Proposed Procedures and Actions re Self-Insurance - Workers ' Compensation Upon the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee, the Joint Boards have approved implementation of a program of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage. Towards that end, the staff has requested proposals from administrators, and we have prepared procedures for operating under this new system. A resolution has been submitted for your consideration authorizing the detailed procedures for administering and settling liability claims. This includes prescribed limits to settle without Board approval. All settlements over $5,000 will be submitted to the Boards. The resolution re workers' compensation submitted for the Directors consideration authorizes (1) the termination of present coverage with the State Fund; (2) the General Manager to retain the services of an administrator; (3) to obtain "excess" coverage over the $100,000. 00 per claim of self- insurance and (4) the establishment of reserve and trust accounts to fund the program. The practical operation of the workers ' compensation program differs from public liability and, therefore, no resolution is offered to authorize settle- ments, within prescribed limits on these claims. The main reason for that is the fact that there is rarely a compromise settlement; but rather, after an investigation and evaluation of medical records, a value is established per adopted tables and schedules. Awards are calculated and ordered per those schedules. "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" .. • Joint Boards of Directors Page Two June 7, 1978 With both the workers' compensation and liability claims administration, a close working relationship on- each claim file will be required of our administrators so as to insure full information to the Districts staff and my office. I should note that the legal services attendant to the compensa- tion will largely be handled by a law firm other than mine in order to utilize specialists in the field. However, I will want to approve any counsel selected by our administrator in order to insure the highest level of quality service is obtained. Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel • TLW:j c POW.-IN "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 78-107 t ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 31 5, 61 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, -ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PRO- CEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS WHEREAS, claims for damages alleging personal injuries, including death, and to real and personal property, made against the Districts have formerly been processed by a liability insurance carrier of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the liability insurance presently in force on behalf of the Districts provides for a substantial measure of self-insured liability; and, WHEREAS, the District has the primary obligation to process claims and to provide legal defense for claims in matters of litigation filed against it; and, WHEREAS, the District has the need for the retention of ajusting services and legal counsel who shall be vested - with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1', 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(B) = ALL DISTRICTS "V-l" Section 1: A liability reserve is hereby established in the amount of $500,000.00 for the payment of claims made f against the District. Said amount shall be provided for in the 1978-79 annual budget to insure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts not covered -by liability insurance. Section 2: Each subsequent annual budget shall provide for sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 3: A claims investigation and adjustment firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the District in an amount -not to exceed $1,000. 00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an, agreement approved by the General Counsel. Section 4 : A committee comprised of the General Manger, Finance Director and General Counsel are authorized to -review and make full settlement of any claims made against the - District for liability damages not otherwise covered by in- surance by payment of a sum not to exceed $5,000. 00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than -the District's General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the -2- "V-2 AGENDA ITEM #15(s) - ILL DISTRICTS "V-2" ' District's legal counsel within the same limits. Section 5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding $5,000. 00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors of the defendant District or the Joint Boards in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of additional legal counsel for purposes of representing the District in the defense of any matters of litigation, wherein he determines that specialized expertise or experience are desirable or that the workload- requires the utilization of outside counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14 , 1978. r�'1 _3- "V-3" AGENDA ITEM #r15(B) ALL DISTRICTS "V-3" LOS ANGELES OFFICE CARL. WARREN & CO. SANTA ANA OFFICE .1213) 382-6141 INSURANCE ADJUSTERS 17141547-5571 OXNARD OFFICE 1505 EAST 17•M STREET 12131 924.77si (005)485-5443 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 SANTA BARBARA OFFICE 12131 883-7880 (7141 547-5571 18051 687.2594 12131 924-7761 SAN DIEGO OFFICE (7M)283-6021 May 3, 1978 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 r• Attention: J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary Dear Mr. Sylvester: We wish to thank you for your request for a quotation on claim administration and adjusting for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. We wish to submit a bid for $100.00 per month for claims admini- stration on liability claims. This would include the handling of property damage and bodily injury claims. This fee will also include our computer print-out which will give claims statistics and loss control data every 30 days. In addition tothe above services, we would have available our field adjusters for the investigation and handling of any claims involvling serious potential. The cost of these services are as follows: Adjuster's Services $16 .50 per hour Photographs 1.00 each Transportation . 20 per mile Photocopies -.15 per page - Secretarial 1.50 per page Office Expense 10% of adjuster's services plus $7.00 file makeup. A copy of one of our bills is attached for your information. As a courtesy to the entity, we will provide quarterly billings for all field services. LOS ANGELES OFFICE SERVES LOS ANGELES COUNTY OXNARD OFFICE SERVES VENTURA AND KERN COUNTIES SAN DIEGO OFFICE SERVES SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES SANTA ANA OFFICE SERVES ORANGE.RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES SANTA BARBARA OFFICE SERVES SANTA BARBARA AND SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTIES "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(c) - ALL DISTRICTS 11VIII -2- This will provide exact figures for incurred expenses and assist in budgetary projections. • If you have any questions concerning our claims administration services, please feel free to contact us. We are enclosing for your perusal a copy of a specimen contract. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & CO. Roy S. George- / Assistant Vice President RS G: sb Encl: Specimen contract "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-2" RESOLUTION NO. 78-108 ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF LEGAL SELF-INSURANCE BY THE DISTRICTS RE WORKERS' COMPENSATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 22 3, 52 6, 7 AND 11, ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF LEGAL SELF- INSURANCE BY THE DISTRICTS RE WORKERS' COMPEN- SATION AND AUTHORIZING NECESSARY ACTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION WHEREAS, the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors have made studies relating to the feasibility of being legally self-insured for workers' compensation; and, WHEREAS, it has been recommended that the Districts be legally self-insured for workers' compensation for the reasons that significant cost savings will likely be realized, better safety programs will be established for the benefit of District employees and a higher level of service of compensation claims can be expected; and, �1 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 approved implementation of said self-insurance program; and, 'WHEREAS, it has been further recommended that at such time as the Districts become legally self-insured, that the services of an administrator be retained to be responsible for all aspects of claims processing and coordination with Districts staff and legal counsel: NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 12 22 32 51 62 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. The nonrenewal of the existing agreement between the Districts and the State Compensation Insurance Fund for the Fund to provide primary workers' compensation insurance coverage is approved effective July 1, 1978, or as soon, thereafter, as the self-insurance program can be fully implemented; and, Section 2. The General Manager is authorized to execute a workers' compensa- tion administrative services agreement effective July 1, 1978, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, "X-1" AGENDA ITEM #P15(E) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-1 Section 3. The General Manager is authorized to obtain a re-insurance policy, in the amount above the level of self-insurance, so as to provide coverage for extraordinary compensation claims, from the State Compensation Insurance Fund or any other qualified private carrier. Said policy to be effective July 1, 1978, or upon implementation of the self-insurance program; and, Section 4. A Workers' Compensation Reserve Account is hereby established in the amount of $500,000.00, as previously authorized by Board action estab- lishing a reserve account for public liability expenses and claim losses. It is the intent of the Districts that the total reserve of $500,000.00 shall be provided to fund both workers' compensation and public liability expenses and claim losses; and, Section S. A Workers' Compensation Trust Account is hereby established to provide funds that may be disbursed by the Districts' Claims Administrator as payment of expenses and claims; and, Section 6. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to open a commercial bank checking account for said Workers' Compensation Trust Account in an amount appropriate to accommodate efficient processing of workers' compensa- tion claims; and provide for drawing of checks against said account by the Districts' Claims Administrator; and, Section 7. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to draw warrants for the initial deposit of funds in said Workers' Compensation Trust Account and to reimburse said account for authorized expenditures therefrom;: and, the County Auditor - Controller and County Treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to issue and pay said warrants. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(E) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-211 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 June 7, 1978 (714) 962-2411 S T A F F R E P O R T STATUS REPORT ON SOLIDS PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES As a result of the restraints associated with the processing and disposal of sludge in the operation of. Goldenwest Fertilizer Company for the long range solids disposal needs of the Districts, the staff has been actively engaged in pursuing alternate dis- posal sites. Discussions have been held with the staff of LA/01A, representatives from the Irvine Ranch Water District, The Irvine Company, County Solid Waste Division and Commanding General and his staff of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station. Several proposed sites for processing and disposal of sewage solids have been investigated which are described as follows: 1. Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill The County Solid haste Management Division will phase out the solid waste landfill operation at this facil- ity in July, 1981. Discussions have been held with the County as to the feasibility of the Districts ' processing the sludge at this site and blending it with the solid waste material, incorporating the composted sludge with the "topping" material, or recycling it after composting the material. It is proposed that the private contractor "Goldenwest Fertilizer, Inc. " would truck the material to the • landfill site and the composting operation would be conducted with Districts ' personnel. This operation would terminate with the vacation, by the County, of the sanitary landfill. 2. The Irvine Company Property Adjacent to 405 Freeway and Laguna Canyon Road Representatives of The Irvine Company have indicated the possibility of a short-term lease (3 to 5 years) for composting operations on vacant land on the Company's property adjacent to the area where the Irvine Ranch Water District is disposing of their sludge. This site is only temporary and would not provide ultimate disposal. All material processed at this site would have to be removed for recycling purposes. "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "Y-1" Staff Report June 7, 1978 Page Two �1 3. El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Site Discussions were held with Major General Joseph Koler regarding the feasibility of a remote canyon located on the military reservation. The site appeared to be the only area available which would haves minimum of nuisance impacts on the Air Station' s operations, as well as the adjacent residential developments. The particular area examined is the area set aside by the Air Station for the ammunition bunkers and the making up of bombs. This area does not appear to be a viable alternative for the Districts. 4. Bee and Round Canvon *Solid Disnosal Sites The County Solid Waste Division is presently pursuing the feasibility of solid waste disposal sites in Bee and Round Canyons, located on The Irvine Companv property, which are planned to commence operation with the cessation of operation at Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill. Based on the projections prepared by the County, these Canyons should be adequate to serve the solid waste disposal problem for a portion of the County until after the year 2000: Since the Districts ' volume of sludge is very minor in compari- son to the volumes processed by the Countv in the solid waste disposal progran. , it may be feasible to incorporate the Districts ' solids _processing and ultimate disposal program with the County at these two sanitarv� landfill sites. Since the Districts will be engaged in composting operations, it is the staff' s recommendation that the Districts proceed, as soon as possible, to procure the necessary equipment for this operation. Composting operations consist of a windrow method by applying approximately seven cubic yards per acre per day. This figure is based upon the history of the Districts ' recent operation at Plant No. 2 and would provide for a relatively nuisance free operation. To be successful in a windrow operation, which must be conducted on a seven day per week basis, will require approxi- mately five full time employees on a staggered work-shift, with the following equipment: EQUIPMENT RANGE OF USED EQUIPMENT NEW EQUIPMENT Rototiller $25,000 to $ 55,000 $ 90,000 Blade 25,000 to 40,000 65,000 Water Truck 15,000 to 250,000 35 ,000 � Dump Truck (2) 201.000 to 20,000 251,000 Loader Conveyor 12 ,000 to 151,000 201,000 $97,000 to $155,000 $235,000 "Y-211 AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "Y-2" 4. Staff Report June 7, 1978 r� Page Three It is, therefore, recommended that the .Districts proceed as soon nr, as possible to,, procure the necessary equipment to perform composting operations at the selected site. Since the procurement of the rototiller is essential to the operation, purchase of this equipment should be done immediately. Delivery of new equipment will range from six to nine months. Staff has located a used rototiller which can be procured within the next sixty days. The balance of the equipment is not as critical as far as delivery times are concerned. REL:hjb . ram "Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #16(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "Y-3" r Agenda Item No, 0.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS TELEPH AREA CODE 714 5400 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA —2 91 9 6 2 1 e�' �t 9 6 2—2 41 1 P. 0. BOX 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E 10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF—RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 14, 1978 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Last Thursday, June 8th, the General Manager and I appeared on behalf of the Districts at EPA's West. Coast -hearing on their secondary treatment waiver regulations . If EPA -ignores the testimony as they did following their public meeting- on . the- same subject in February, no one will be able to receive a waiver because of EPA' s harsh interpretation of the Amend- ment to the Act. - Just prior to last Thursday's hearing, representatives of the major West Coast dischargers met to discuss what action should be taken to insure that EPA' s regulations are fair. We concluded that the decisions are political rather than technical. Therefore, I have written the enclosed letter to Senator Cranston. ks-�-`Senate Democratic Whip, he can exert considerable influence on Senator Muskie who is Chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works , Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution, and officials at EPA. I am asking each Director to have his Mayor write or call Senator Cranston within the next 10 days, expressing concern that unless EPA's proposed regulations for secondary treatment waivers are changed before final adoption, . a $1/2 billion in wasteful construction will be required in California. Incidentally, the State Water Resources Control Board supports our position. Attached is a copy of my testimony on the subject, and AMSA' s statement which was presented by our General Manager. . Donald J. Saltarelli Joint Chairman • Senator Alan Cranston 229 Russell Senate Office Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-3553 TELEPHONES: k..OUNTY SANITATION - DISTRICTS t AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 411 P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY June 121, 1978 Hon. Alan Cranston United States Senate Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Cranston: It appears that unless EPA' s propo.sed regulations implementing Section 301(h) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act are drastically changed to be more in conformance with *the adopted California Ocean Plan, your efforts to save' $1/2 billion for Cali- fornia (August 4, 1977 Congressional Record, San Diego Tribune August 15, 1977) will be nullified by EPA administrative actions. Enclosed are two communications to the Environmental Protection Agency from the California State Water Resources Control Board which indicate to me that we can have environmentally sound water pollution control programs without the above-mentioned wasteful expenditure of Federal, State and local tax funds . The enclosed June. 3, 1977 letter of John E. Bryson, Chairman of the California State Water Resources Control Board, to Mr. Douglas Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, states that upwards of 1/2 billion dollars could be saved with no apparent environmental harm with the implementation of the California Ocean Plan versus a blanket secondary treatment re quirement. Since Mr. Bryson's letter to Mr. Costle, the Congress amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to permit waivers of the Federal secondary treatment requirement for deep ocean dischargers subject to eight statutory criteria. However, EPA's proposed regulations dated April 25, 1978, to implement this Amendment will Prevent any waivers from being given. The State Water Resources Control Board confirms this conclusion in their letter to EPA dated May 11, 1978 re: Implementing Section 301(h) Modification of Secondary Treatment for Discharges to Marine COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708 Senator Alan Cranston (714)540.2910 June 12, 1978 (714)962-2411 Page 2 Waters, by stating that their "proposed regulations preclude any successful application for the modification of secondary treatment for discharges to marine waters for the following reasons : 1. The requirement for no greater level of toxic constituents than would occur if complete secondary treatment were installed -2. The requirement that EPA's water quality criteria for man-made toxic constituents be achieved in the effluent prior to discharge 3. The .requirement that the discharge be in compliance with all applicable water quality standards at .the date of appli- cation". I am enclosing a copy of Senator'Gravel's .letter dated June 1, 1978, to the" EPA Administrator on this same subject. The electorate in California, last Tuesday, with the passage of Proposition 13, gave all of us elected officials a clear and concise • message that government spending must be reduced and that only necessary services be provided. On behalf of the Boards of Directors of our Sanitation Districts, we request your immediate attention to this pressing matter. Donald -J. Saltarelli Joint Chairman CC: California Congressional delegation Members of the Orange County Sanitation Districts ' Board of Directors State Water Resources Control Board COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ~r • 01 ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.0.80X 8127 June 8, 19 7 8 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540.2910 (714)962.2411 STATEMENT OF DONALD J. SALTARELLI , JOINT CHAIRMAN OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HEARING .ON MODIFICATIONS TO SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON June 8, 1978 My name is Donald J. Saltarelli. I am the Joint Chairman of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. The Sanita- tion Districts serve a population of 1k million people comprising 23 cities and numerous other local entities within the metropolitan portion of Orange County.. We discharge 185 million gallons per day of treated effluent to the ocean, 5 miles at sea in approximately 195-feet of water through a 6, 000-foot-long diffuser. I am accompanied today by Fred Harper, General Manager of the Sanitation Districts. For many years , we have been, through the AMSA organization, one of the strongest supporters of State and Federal policies that would avoid the use of public funds and- scarce energy for unnecessary treat- ment projects . As an elected official for a city in California, I am sure you can appreciate my increased concern for a rational balance of water pollution control objectives and the cost-effective use of public funds. Last Tuesday, the electorate in California, by Constitutional Amendment, slashed the ability of the State and local governments to tax property oumers, by 60%. This was a clear and concise demand by the taxpayers that government spending be reduced and that only necessary t�� ♦y4 services be provided. If our agency is required to go to full secondary treatment, another $100 million in capital costs will be required, plus the attendant annual operating and maintenance costs , to be borne by the local taxpayer (approx. $7 million) without any measureable improvement to the environment. While we are not here today to plead a case for the Orange County Sanitation Districts, I believe it is relative to express our approach for a waiver. We expect to comply in 1981 with the 1978 adopted Cali- fornia Ocean Plan. We are committed to the construction of 125 mgd of secondary treatment facilities . We expect our blended flow to the ocean to contain less than 100 mg/1 BOD and 65 mg/1 suspended solids by 1981. In addition, we have adopted a phased source-control ordinance which regulates the discharge of toxic waste constituents at the source. In the best interest of the public and the credibility of the entire water pollution control program, we are hopeful that EPA will modify its proposed regulations to permit a true and honest evaluation of a local agency' s ability to meet the intent of Congress to grant waivers of the secondary treatment requirement where local agencies can demonstrate that something less than secondary treatment is adequate to protect the deep marine waters into which they discharge. EPA' s proposed regulations implementing Section 301(h) of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 (PL 95-217) has precluded many applicants who qualify under the intent of the legislation from success- fully obtaining a modification of secondary treatment requirements for the following reasons : -2- .Myfi Toxic pollutant removals equivalent to those achieved by secondary treatment are required despite the fact that less than secondary treatment would be allowed if a modification were granted. Effluent concentrations of man-made organics (such as polychlorinated biphenyls) are not to exceed EPA marine water quality criteria with no allowance made for initial dilution in the receiving waters. EPA' s marine water quality criteria were developed based on the premise that appropriate application factors (dilution) would be �1 considered. . Applicants must demonstrate their discharge meets all applicable State water quality standards on the date of application. Toxic pollutant removal equivalent to secondary treatment will preclude issuance of a waiver for all Publicly owned Treatment Works (POTI•1' s) which have any type of industrial or commercial discharges to its system. Removals of trace metals and synthetic organics by intermediate treatment methods (advanced primary) cannot achieve the same reductions as biological secondary treatment. . Thus, those POTW t s seeking a modification will -•3- l be required to implement source controls more stringent than the industrial pretreatment requirements if they are to achieve the specified removals. The intent of Congress was to provide for "attainment or maintenance of that water quality which assures protection of public water supplies and the protection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish and wildlife, and allow recreational activities, in and on the water" (PL 95-217 , 33 USC 1342) . If the intent is followed, based upon compliance with applicable State and Federal marine water quality criteria and environmental monitoring data, then toxic pollutant removal equivalent to secondary treatment should not be required. If an applicant can demonstrate that he has, a substantial likelihood of achieving effluent quality specified in a modified permit and the discharge "trill not result in the discharge of pollutants in quantities which may reasonably be anticipated to pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment because of bioaccumulation, persistency in the environment, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity (including carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or teratogenicity) , or synergistic propensities" (PL 92-217, 33 USC 314) , then compliance with State and EPA marine water quality criteria is all that is necessary to provide for environmental protection in deep ocean waters. --4- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, like other .major marine dischargers seeking a NPDES Permit modification, now have an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letter specifying a schedule for meeting secondary treatment requirements. The Districts will not achieve compliance with existing State water quality standards until construction of additional treat- ment facilities= is completed. Construction of these facilities and full implementation of the phased industrial source control ordinance will continue for several years. Ocean monitoring studies have shown effects on the marine environment from ,our discharge to be relatively minor. The proposed regulations call for physical, chemical, and bio- logical assessments to be used in making a determination of overall environmental effects and to support the request for a modification of the 30 mg/1 requirement for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids, Such..environnental assess- ments in specific geographic locations were . intended by Congress ' to be used by an applicant to support its case for a modification. In the large coastal metropolitan areas of Southern California, implementation of State and Federal regulations for wastewater treatment has been a long and costly process. To date, signi- ficant progress has been made in developing effective industrial source control programs, upgrading treatment (including sludge disposal) , initiating cost-effective wastewater reclamation projects, and monitoring .gnvironmental impacts. Some of the ocean research and monitoring work completed to date has received worldwide recognition and added significantly to our understanding of the effects of wastewater effluent discharge on the marine environment. We can appreciate the difficulty involved in drafting these proposed regulations and the even more difficult task of reviewing applications and granting modified permits. However, we believe that a more reasonable approach in defining removal criteria and specifying application information is necessary. Attached are our recommended changes to the draft regulations f which we hope will assist you in developing final regulations. We will be happy P an to provide additional information or to Y assist you further. -6- EXISTING AND FUTURE TREATMENT CAPACITY ISSUE The proposed criteria provide for increases in design capacity up to the flow limitations specified in the applicant' s current N.P.D.E.S. permit. Additional treatment facilities to accommodate planned growth or to improve effluent quality which have been planned, under design, or construction prior to the date of the filing of the application, are not considered as "in place" . This also applies to adopted source control provisions or pretreatment facilities which have not been fully implemented. Also, rxo increases in effluent volume from areas outside an applicant' s existing ser- vice area are Allowed. PROPOSED CHANGE For both capacity and quality purposes, "existing discharge" should be defined to include all facilities which have been proposed or approved under Step I, II, or III EPA grants prior to the date .of application. This would provide for consideration of capacity increases both within and outside the existing service area which have been planned or approved. The criteria should also allow "existing" facilities to include proposed improvements that have been delayed as a result of Step I planning (EIS activities) under review by the State or EPA at the time of waiver. TOXIC POLLUTANT REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS ISSUE The criteria state that an applicant must (1) meet EPA marine water quality criteria after initial dilution or (2) the leve.1 of effluent quality obtainable by secondary treatment, whichever is the most stringent. DISCUSSION EPA marine water quality criteria have not yet been adopted and there are some applicants who will not have secondary treatment facilities or industrial source control programs on which to base their detailed assessments of effluent quality. Because of the lack of criteria and removal data for toxic pollutants, applicants should be allowed to demonstrate to the best of their ability how toxic pollutants will be removed and what the seawater concentrations will be upon discharge and initial dilution. PROPOSED CHANGE The proposed regulation should be changed to eliminate the require- ment for removal equivalent to that achieved through secondary treatment. An applicant should be required to demonstrate that applicable state and Federal water quality criteria will be achieved upon completion of the source control programs and alternative treatment facilities he proposes in lieu of full secondary ��' treatment* MEETING STATE STAyDARDS ON DATE OF APPLICATION : ISSUE Will the discharge meet all applicable State water quality stan- dards (Amended Ocean Plan) at the time of application, and can the State' of California provide a letter certifying compliance? DISCUSSION This cannot be determined because EPA has not certified the California Ocean Plan as amended. As of this date, the SWRCB has received no indication from EPA that they intend to certify the Ocean Plan and no time schedule has been. established. SWRCB has sent a letter h1 '' to EPA in response to the Section 301 (h) Regulations asking if the Ocean Plan, as amended, will meet EPA's needs for surrogate para- meters for water quality standards for BOD and SS . At the present time, our Districts ' discharge does not meet all applicable State effluent or water quality standards specified in California's Amended Ocean Plan, but anticipates achieving them in a reasonable period of time as new treatment facilities are completed. Most coastal communities in California cannot presently meet all of the State's stringent effluent and water quality standards. However, most are on compliance schedules to do so within a specified time frame. If they do not -achieve them on schedule, they face enforcement action and possible fines. l PROPOSED CHANGE Suggest changing regulations to allow for a letter from the State stating that enforcement action will be taken against an applicant if compliance with State water quality standards is not achieved by the date specified in any existing compliance schedule. • y TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW . OF MODIFICATION APPLICATION ISSUE The Regulation contains no time limits for review of the application by EPA. There is no sense of urgency and no information to allow the applicant to schedule his ongoing improvement program. PROPOSED CHANGE The proposed Regulation should contain specific dates or time limitations for EPA' s review, hearings, collection of hearing material, decision making, and appeals. A tight time fram6 of approximately six months should be set forth to expedite the process and make final determinations on secondary treatment requirements. This will minimize the costs associated with inflation, reduce the existing discharge of pollutants, and avoid the possible loss or reduction of State or Federal grant funding. SUGGESTED CHANGES IN APPLICATION FORM SECTION 1 PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT Subsection B. Oce-an Discharge Question 1-12a - The request for seasonal measurements of current speed and direction and continuous profiles of salinity iri' transects from the shore to at least one pipe- line length greater than the outfall distance offshore is an unreasonable request in some circumstances. For Example: An outfall extending 5 miles- offshore would require that one monitor salinity up to 10 miles offshore. Obviously, salinities 10 miles offshore would not be meaningful for measuring any effects from the addition of wastewater effluents to the marine environment given the dilution and dispersion it receives in the open ocean. To determine effects, data collection should be much closer . to the outfall as specified in the last part of the question. Suggested Change: Delete the words "at least one pipeline length greater than the outfall distance offshore" from the first sentence of Question 1-12a. Question 1-12c - Why is continuous wind data requested? An outfall discharges at depth and relies on currents to disperse diluted wastewaters. Suggested Change: This requirement should be deleted or it should be stated why it is requested. Question 1-12e - Does the word "continuous" imply long-term records over a number of years at regular intervals or does it mean 24 hours a day for some period of time? Suggested Chancre: Omit the word "continuous" and add language to "to show the direction of currents under different meteorological and oceanographic conditions. " SECTI0:1 2 COMPLIANCE WITH BOD AND D Question 2-3 reads: "Provide applicable state water quality criteria levels in receiving water. You may only apply for a BOD modification if a value is entered in 2-3a or 2--3b below: a.. D.O, mg/1 b. * BOD mg/1" As stated, this would preclude any California marine dis- chargers from applying for a BOD modification because California' s Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters (a's amended) does not contain a specific numerical criteria, but states the following: "The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not at any time be depressed more than 10 percent from that which occurs naturally, as the result of the discharge of oxygen demanding waste materials. " Suggested Change: This question should be simply stated "Provide applicable State water quality criteria for receiving waters. " Question 2-16 - This question asks for an evaluation of biostimulatory effects on environmental quality and marine organisms. It suggests that all biostimulatory effects are detrimental or undesirable. This should be reworded to account for increases in "desirable" organisms or increases in productivity from the nutrients contained in treated . wastewaters. 2- •• '- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 ' ABLE 1 PREDICTED OUTFALL FLOTgS AND BOD AND SS QUALITY OUI'FALL FLOW DATE PROJECT COMPLETED PRIMARY SECONDARY TOTAL BOD SS July, 1978 *Present Plant Facili- 135 MGD 30 MGD 165 NIGD 200 mg/1 130 mg/l ities July, 1979 Plant No. 1, P1-16, 13S MGD 4S MGD 180 MGD 166 mg/l 100 mg/l 60 MGD Secondary Treatment July, 1981 Plant No. 2, P2-23, 52 MGD 135 MGD 187 MGD 95 mg/l 65 mg/l 90 MGD Secondary ?Ow� Treatment January,, 1985 Anaheim Forbay WRP 40 MGD% 135 MGD 175 MGD 75 mg/l 50 mg/l . 25 MGD Reclamation January, 1991 Bolsa Chica WRP 31 MGD 135 MGD 166 MGD 60 mg/l 40 mg/1 25 MGD Reclamation *1S MGD is being reused by Orange County Water District i00Z (n cc • O l o 9661 U- Z W 1661 �- � LLJ _J CC . oc o 9861 U Z o O 1861 U) o LL z w O L" --p Z J W Z Q- —J• 1 Z V �QO W O < Z n-ff% m Q ts. F}-- '" 1- O Z _ W z 91-61 W z U) U .)W W O U z •� - �" c9 [1_ LQ fYl j L61 O ir Q W J 9961 c Q w w a z z I—cn J W Z ww w U. - 1961 Q O � W Q 0 J u � U a Q U Z Z J -- 9961 z O O • n O a O O O a cc '� x M M N Of to O Li- Z w O •a*DOPY Ni MOIJ a - I OO Z M 1---1 • O J 0 tai. • J Q 2 LL- c� - V — 9661 Z :Z LLJ U O to LL- O 1661 }- O � pNJ � o Mcr- o a- O LLJ ` — 9861 CL 186! H 0O o W Z � u. U- Z w QC —O z Q WzQ- � , Q z U 1 IL 1— o Q ZaMm tr o Z -- 9L61 Q — LLIW z 7 � �om Ic U U Q � V � -fW � .� Qm z� a du � cr L6! 0 d — 9961 Q W W � ' U Q z Z Q Q 0 0 LU z Z U-J W O' W LL. LL k N_ — 1961 CC W p ,J W Q UO W a � I c.� z — 9S61 o Oo O O O n p � M1 to N N -L' z w 0 *0'!J'W NI MO`J - a z — IOOZ O cr z cr _, 0 Q f- _J- �..,, - z Q w LL- �-- o c� F --- 9661 z z o _ oz0 -� w 0 z [J/�J _ >- -I Q UX 0 W 00JU 1661 � O 0 k. V Q U U � 0 LWW F- O �a: Z U ` — 9861 VUW t 00 Cl- 0 _ Cr CD !- Cl- c!) — 1861 V Q Z - --- — 9 L 61 ZO U F- r' • o z Z M ' < U _ 11,61 � Z Z - a :3 cr- O O U • - 9961 J J � Z w Q w }- Z 2 M t� 0 W - 1961 `Z 4- a cr O 2 —• 9961 -i O N N 00 O Z to -. _ . 00a SS W 1/1 W NI NOIIVUIN30NOY 0 ... looz p• p Q � uj V 4 • U O ti. U 1 p o w 0 U ~ 1661 CC O � 3ti 4 w o co Z t� w o to I- - 9861 n- • Cl) Z 1861 � O O CD W Li Z J W _0 Z pZO - 8�bI o d • WZQ. J T U �1 a J cn 1- °- z M m ° Z — 9L61 W Z :3 c~� I- o m � � �- � v a �°0 OV �� z - cc O o — 1161 V Q :,- %J o ;Q J 1. — 9961 cc W W E- UJ W z L a 3. z }-O - W Z' D (n J W O 1961. Q O ;x LtJ O "J a Q V � v 0- o c, V Z a — 91961 2 _ O O O O O O O O O0 X h O to h O T w 0 'WTVY NI MO-1- a STATEMENT OF ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES at the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS on MODIFICATION OF SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGES INTO MARINE WATERS Washington, D. C. June 2, 1978 My name is Fred Harper. Ikam the General Manager of the County Sani- tation Districts of Orange County, California, but I am here today in my role as President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) . AMSA is an organization made up of large metropolitan : sewerage agencies throughout the United States. Its membership in- cludes 65 agencies representing more than 50 million people, the bulk of the sewered population of this country. Appendix A is a list of AMSA members. I am accompanied today by Lee C. White, AMSA Counsel. AMSA and a number of its member agencies have been among the strongest advocates of a national policy that would avoid the unnecessary expen- diture of public funds and the use of increasingly scarce energy in applying the universal requirement of secondary treatment contained in PL 92-500. We applaud the decision of Congress in the Clean Water Act of 1977 that recognized this principle and welcome the opportunity to participate in this public hearing to discuss the regulations proposed by EPA to implement the new policy . (Section 301(h) ) of the - Clean Water Act of 1977. Individual AMSA agencies will be submitting their- own detailed views at the hearing scheduled for June 8 in Seattle. The statutory requirements of Section 301 (h) and the complex and technological character of those requirements have made the job of drafting the regulations very difficult. We appreciate the need for EPA to move expeditiously to be able to meet the statutory deadline of September 24, 1978, and we- are not unmindful 'of the continuing efforts that have been made to develop regulations in a fashion that . . will be both manageable by the applicants and consistent with the Congressional mandate. In today's statement, we shall dwell primarily on the procedural requirements; the substantive points will be more thoroughly discussed in the June 8 Seattle hearing and in the formal comments that will be submitted to EPA by the June 9 deadline. General Observations • All EPA documents, .4tatements, and proposed regulations treat Section . 301(h) as though it is an unreasonable burden that was imposed upon • the agency and that care must be taken to ensure that no municipal agencies qualify, or if they do qualify, that the costs and the risks will be so great the municipal systems will not even want to file applications. We do not conceive the Congressional policy to be cast in such restrictive terms that none or only one or two agencies will . qualify. AMSA's own zeal for controlling water pollution, and that of its members and the millions of citizens who are served by AMSA _2- members predated the 1972 Act; most AMSA -agencies were in the fore-r ' front of the national effort to focus attention on the need to control pollution. We believe, therefore, that our credentials are rather solid and can earnestly urge that the opportunity for modified permits adopted by Congress reflects an increasing concern that the nation receive the fullest value for funds spent on environmental • protection, in general, and water pollution control in particular. We urge, therefore, that EPA regard Section 301(h) as an opportunity to demonstrate a willingness to accept, and even to encourage and facilitate, a process which will convince the citizenry that there can be a rational balance between water pollution control objectives and cost-effective use of public funds. it is not AMSA's belief that every coastal discharger is likely to meet the statutory criteria and thereby receive a modified permit, but rather it is our position that the agency should deem the new ,. provision to be sound-ly based on technology and to reflect the increas-- _ ..: ing concern that public funds be employed in the most efficient fashion possible. AMSA members involved are major agencies and the facilities that are in question cost tens and hundreds of millions of .dollars. Although 75% of that amount may be Federally funded, we also have a concern about using Federal funds, as well as state and . local funds, in a manner that does not bring discredit uponthe entire Water Pollution Control Program. Properly, the philosophy of PL 92-500 .requires the users of sewerage facilities to pay for the operation and maintenance (including replacement) of these major installations, and *..-, bills for sewerage service, like all others, are going only one way: up. The great national concern about inflation is not somehow or other removed from implementing a policy dealing with the handling of waste materials, including sewerage. Existing Discharge Concept • Perhaps the most striking example of the restrictive policy evidenced . ''by EPA is the narrow interpretation of "existing. discharge" incor- porated into the proposed regulations. The summary of the purpose of the provision contained in the Senate Committee Report (Sen. Rep. 95-370) at page 44, reads, in part, as follows: "This section t amends section 301, Effluent Limitations, to provide for a modifi- cation of the secondary treatment requirement for any conventional pollutant in a discharge into marine waters from existing principal sources. . . " This clearly suggests that the provision was intended to focus on the existing principal sources- of pollution, rather than to suggest that the policy was to preclude modification or new construction that would permit implementing the policy. It is inconceivable to us that Congress would find any rational basis for suggesting that there is virtue in conserving public funds by pre-- 'venting unnecessary construction of expensive waste treatment facilities only if the situation that existed on December 27, 1977, met the criteria of the Act. The regulations should reflect a stringent attitude, but should not be cast in virtually impossible terms. AMSA believes that a far more sensible approach to implementing Section 301 (h) is to adopt a policy that will encourage municipal f""1 systems to discuss directly and candidly with EPA staff whether the particular circumstances that prevail in their areas make it worthy of exploring whether an application can be prepared and submitted �q for consideration that has a fair chance of approval. EPA's staff should be instructed to work with communities constructively to achieve a modified permit if the physical properties make it possible. Procedures In a general sense, we applaud the decision to- use the more informal approach of the Administrative Procedures Act. We also commend the ` - new approach- in the proposed rules published in- the Federal Register .. for April 25, 1978, which relaxes somewhat the absolute requirements of the earlier version dealing with the submission of data subsequent to the filing deadline of September 24. All applying agencies recognize the dilemma of spending too much time and too much money on a process that inevitably contains some element of risk. But the ability under the proposed regulations to petition for the right to submit additional data gives at least some reasonableness to the process. We assume and we certainly urge that if. the rules go into effect as proposed, that the Administrator's discretion in this con- nection will- not be narrowly interpreted and administered. : ,AMSA supports the concept of "tentative determinations" and believes that a reasonable use of. that process can result in a more manageable workload for EPA and at the same time avoid excessive cost and expectations by applicants about their prospects for ultimately receiving a modified permit. The regulations should make it explicit that the EPA staff can and should work with the applicant in developing the tentative decision, and in particular that the staff can request and the applicant can submit additional data where it is required. Although, in most instances, the tentative decision will be accepted, there should be a process for appealing that tentative finding quickly, . .to the Administrator if not the courts, in order to provide guidance . . . to the applying agency as to whether it is worthwhile to make the financial and time investment required to go forward in pursuing the total process. The regulations are silent on whether the filing of the request for a modified permit is to- be given any weight im a municipal agency's position of compliance or non-compliance with the July 1, 1977, • secondary treatment deadline. Although there should not necessarily be an absolute -suspension of the deadline for those municipal agencies which are applying for 301(h) modified permits, there should be some presumption that such a filing constitutes a defense to any action by governmental or private parties on the PL 92-500 deadlines. The proposed regulations evidence great concern over the "predictive" character of implementing Section 301 (h) . Certainly one can- under- . . stand the desirability of objective standards and tests to simplify the burden of determining whether or not a particular applicant has - met the statutory criteria. However, in a real but somewhat imperfect. . world, we are continuously required to deal with the future and its vagaries. Every reasonable effort ought- to be made to reduce t -4- implementation of Section 301 (h) to measurable standards, but in the view of AMSA, it would- be a perversion of the policy adopted by ^. Congress to make such an approach mandatory and exclusive. The regulation should not tie the Administrator's hands, and -we urge that there be qualifying language adopted which will emphasize the . desirability of submissions that meet objective measurements, but at the same time provide that -any application which makes a strong case that the goals can be met will not be automatically rejected. Empirical data may not be available by the deadline for filing appli- cations, and even if a great deal of technological and scientific measuring has previously taken place, there should and must be an opportunity for applicants to demonstrate in the many ways available to advocates that a case can be made by the use of conventional techniques for forecasting how physical construction and proposed programs will operate. - Under the proposed regulations, the Administrator may have the opportunity and the authority to "average" a municipal agency's total .-..system operation, but we have found nothing in the proposed regulation that would either mandate or encourage such "average". A number of major West Coast agencies have already completed or are in the process of constructing conventional secondary treatment facilities---for a . variety of reasons, including the availability of funds, .the belief that some secondary treatment would be desirable and the inability to Predict whether legislation along the lines of Section 301(h) would - be enacted. It would be reassuring and reasonable to -incorporate such language into the regulations,- and we so recommend. Timing is a consideration of great significance, not only because of the inflationary effects of delay, but because of the competing re- quests for funds allocated to the various states. There are short deadlines and even some requirements where the required parameters and groundrules.. "will- be available later" , but there is no corresponding .. sense of commitment to fix a schedule by which applications will be _. processed. Admittedly, it is difficult to predict how many applications will -be submitted, but at a minimun, the regulations should require some expedited processing and should require the development of a schedule to .guide applicants and others as the process wends its way. Conclusion . AMSA appreciates the inherent difficulties in administering Section 301 (h) that have been imposed upon the Administrator of EPA. • But we contend and believe logic and common sense dictate that the I.. proposed regulations must not make a nullity of the provision which . reflects a Congressional mandate and implements a rational and reasonable policy. We urge the Administrator to accept the .suggestions contained in this statement in revising the regulations for promulga- tion in final form. "- • APPENDIX A r� er . Members of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies By State AL� GEO�RG I A Greater Anchorage Area Borough City of Atlanta ARIZONA HAWAI I City of Tucson City and County of Honolulu CALIFORNIA IDAHO County Sanitation District of City of Boise Orange County (Fountain Valley) ILLINOIS East Bay Municipal Utility District (Oakland) The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago City of Los Angeles KANSAS Los Angeles County Sanitation District. City of Wichita Sacramento Regional County KENTUCKY Sanitation District Louisville and Jefferson County City of Sacramento Metropolitan Sewer District City of San Diego MARYLAND City and County of San Francisco City of Baltimore Ventura Regional County Sanitation Washington Suburban Sanitary District Commission (Hyattsville) City of San Jose MASSACHUSETTS COLORADO Metropolitan District Commission (Boston) Metropolitan -Denver Sewage Disposal District No. l South Essex Sewerage District (Salem) CONNECTICUT MICHIGAN The Metropolitan District (Hartford) County of Wayne (Detroit) FLORIDA MI NNESOTA Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Authority Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Orange County Sewer and Water (St. Paul) , Department (Orlando) ,.q Western Lake Superior Sanitary Di stri City of Tampa (Duluth) MISSOURI OREGON City of Kansas City City of Portland Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Unified Sewerage Authority of 1 District Washington County (Hillsboro) NEBRASKA PENNSYLVANIA City of Omaha Allegheny County Sanitary Authority (Pittsburgh) NEW JERSEY City of Philadelphia Bergen County Sewerage Authority (Li tti a Ferry) Middlesex County Sewerage Authority (Sayreville) TENNESSEE Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners (Newark) City of Nashville NEW YORK TEXAS Albany County Sewer District Dallas Municipal Center County of Monroe (Rochester) El, Paso Water Utilities .Onondaga County Department of City of Fort Worth Drainage and Sanitation (North Syracuse) Fort Worth Water Department City of New York Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority (Houston) NORTH CAROLINA Trinity-River Authority (Arlington) City of Greensboro City of Houston OHIO VIRGINIA City of Akron Hampton Roads Sanitation District Metropolitan Sewer District of Cincinnati WASHINGTON Cleveland Regional Sewer District Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle City of Columbus City of Tacoma City of Dayton City of Toledo 'WEST VIRGINIA . City of Charleston WISCONSIN Green Bay Metropolitan Sanitary District Metropolitan Sewerage District of the County of Milwaukee 5/22/78 JUNE 14, 1978 SUMMARY OF REVISED JOINT WORKS 1978-79 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION REDUCTIONS AND TARGETED EXPENDITURE SAVINGS CAPITAL JOINT OUTLAY OPERATING REVOLVING TOTAL __REDUCTION IN CHARGE TO PROPERTY OWNER (Jo) (CORF) JOINT WORKS 1978-79 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAX LEVY/USER CHARGE-` $ 7,069, 107 $ 6,000,000 $ 13,069, 107 1977-78 AMOUNT RAISED BY TAX LEVY 6,442,422 8,200,000 14,642,422 REDUCTION TO PROPERTY OWNERS $( 626,685) $ 2,200,000 $ 1 ,573,315 TARGETED EXPENDITURE SAVINGS 1978-79 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION $ 8,766,483 $ 31 ,030,000 $ 39,796,483 1978-79 TARGETED EXPENDITURE LIMIT 7,766,483 30,030,000 37,796,483 TARGETED EXPENDITURE SAVINGS $ 1 ,000,000 S 1 ,000,000 $ 2,000,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL REDUCTION/SAVINGS $ 373,315 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,573,315 *EXCLUSIVE OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE USER CHARGES w JUNE 14, 1978 AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES FOR FUNDING 1978-72 OPERATING/CAPITAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS JARVIS-GANN ILL REDUCE THE DISTRICTS' CURRENT (1977-78) $21 .4 MILLION TAX LEVY BY A MINIMUM OF 58% IF THE DISTRICTS RECEIVE A PRO-RATA SHARE OF THE TAXES ALLOWED TO BE COLLECTED BY THE TAX LIMITATION INITIATIVE, TO A MAXIMUM OF 100% IF THE DISTRICTS RECEIVE NO TAXES UNDER THE ALLOCATION METHOD YET TO BE DECIDED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE. ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF FUNDING THE DISTRICTS SEWAGE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR 1978-79 ARE AS FOLLOWS: - FUND 1978-79 REQUIREMENTS FROM CONSTRUCTION RESERVE FUNDS MAJOR ADVANTAGE - NO ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS FOR 1978-79 MAJOR DISADVANTAGES - FUNDS RESERVED FOR CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS WOULD BE DIVERTED FROM CAPITAL TO OPERATING NEEDED AND/OR REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WOULD BE DELAYED - FUNDS WOULD HAVE TO BE REPAID TO CONSTRUCTION RESERVES IN FUTURE YEARS REQUIRING DISPROPOR- TIONATELY HIGHER CHARGE IN THOSE YEARS - LOSS OF INTEREST EARNINGS - FUND 1978-79 REQUIREMENTS BY ESTABLISHING A FLAT RATE USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF PROPERTY TO BE COLLECTED BY THE TAX BILL - MAJOR ADVANTAGES - PROVIDES FINANCING FOR 1978-79 OPERATING AND CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL USE OF CONSTRUCTION RESERVES - STABILIZES PROPERTY OWNER CHARGES AND DISTRICTS CASH FLOW ACCOMMODATES PHASING OF USER CHARGE/REVENUE PROGRAM REQUIRED TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN 1979-80 BY EPA AND SWRCB MAJOR DISADVANTAGES - REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARINGS IN A RELATIVELY SHORT TIME FRAME TO IMPLEMENT - DISTRICTS WILL INCUR ADDED ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COST TO IMPLEMENT (ESTIMATED AT BETWEEN $759000 TO $105,000) PLUS ADDED CHARGE TO COLLECT ON TAX BILL - POSSIBLE PUBLIC BACKLASH IN VIEW OF JARVIS-GANN MANDATE - FLAT USE CHARGE IS NOT EQUITABLE CONTINUE TO LEVY FULL TAX RATE NECESSARY TO FUND 1978-79 REQUIREMENTS ON THE BASIS OF PREVIOUS COUNTY COUNSEL OPINION THAT SANITATION DISTRICT LEVY IS A "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT". SAID OPINION MAY THUS EXCLUDE THE DISTRICTS FROM APPLICATION OF JARVIS-GANN. - MAJOR ADVANTAGE - NO ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS FOR 1978-79 - MAJOR DISADVANTAGES - COUNTY COUNSEL HAS NOT YET RULED ON THIS OPINION RELATIVE TO JARVIS-GANN - MAY RESULT 1N LITIGATION AND THE COURTS MAY FIND AGAINST THIS INTERPRETATION 9 June 14, 1978 ESTIMATED OPERATING/CAPITAL USER CHARGE TO PROVIDE 1978-79 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (a) (b) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1978-79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE 1978-79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE FINANCING BASED ON 1977-78 FINANCIIG BASED ON RECOMMENDED FUNDING LEVEL JOINT WORKS REDUCTION IN CHARGE TO PROPERTY OWNER IF DISTS DO RECEIVE PRO-RATA SHARE OF AMOUNT TO BE MAXIMUM OPER/ TAXES UNDER JARVIS MAXIMUM OPER/ RAISED BY OPER/ CAPITAL USER CAPITAL USER CAPITAL USER 1977-78 TAX FUNDING LEVEL CHARGE IF DISTS AMOUNT TO BE CHARGE IF DISTS CHARGE IF DISTS RECEIVE NO PRO- RAISED BY RECOMMENDED RECEIVED NO PRO- RECEIVE PRO-RATA RATA SHARE OF OPER/CAPITAL JOINT WORKS RATA SHARE OF SHAPE OF TAXES ESTIMATED NUMBER TOTAL TAX OPER/CAPITAL TAXES UNDER JARVIS MAXIMUM OPER/ USER CHARGE TAX LEVY, TAXES UNDER JARVIS UNDER JARVIS DISTRICT OF PARCELS LEVY DEBT SERVICE (1) - (2) (1) - (2) CAPITAL TAX LEVY (4) - (5) REDUCTION (3) - (7) (3) - (5) - (7) 1 $1,382,548 $ 85,775 $ 1,296,773 $ 1,296,773 $ 505,781 $ 790.992 $ 142,437 $ 1.154,336 S 648.555 2 5.729.496 480,116 5,249,380 5,249,380 1,907,846 3,341,534 388,407 4,860.973 2.953.127 3 7,970,515 678,615 7,291,900 7,291,900 2,524,808 4,767,092 572,085 6,719,815 4,195.007 5 1,497,464 26,532 1,470,932 1,470,932 579,860 891.072 106,664 1,364,268 784,4o8 6 879,992 31,923 848,069 848,069 330,324 517,745 103,377 744,692 414,368 7 2,238,815 631,134 1,607,68) 1,607,681 654,780 952.901 156,938 1,450,743 795,963 II 1,729,839 85,121 1,644,718 1,644,718 510,039 1,134,679 103,407 1,541.311 1,031,272 TOTAL $21,428,669 $2,019,216 $19,409,453 $19,409,453 $7,013,438 $12,396,015 $1,573,315 $17.836,138 $10,822,700 OPERATING CAPITAL USER CHARGE PER PARCEL - 1 34.155 $ 37.97 $ 23.16 $ 33.8o $ 18.99 2 113,610 46.21 29.41 42.79 25.99 3 156.555 46.58 30.45 42.92 26.8o 5 19.365 75.96 46.o1 70.45 4o.5 6 21,795 38.91 23.76 34.17 19.01 7 27.075 59.38 35.19 53.58 29.40 11 28,005 58.73 40.52 55.04 36.82 AVERAGE 400,560 $ 48.46 $ 30.95 $ 44.53 $ 27.02 JUNE 14, 1978 TIMETABLE FOR I MENTATION T OF ER AVAILABI, Y CHARGE ` TO BE COLLECTED ON 197 -79 TAX BILL JUNE 14 JUNE 22 JUNE 23 JUNE 28 JULY 3 JULY 5 JULY 7 JULY 18 JULY 27 AUG 9 AUG 10 AUG 23 BOARD ACTIONS ADOPT JOINT INTRODUCE SECOND READING ADOPT WORKS BUDGETS ORDINANCE OF ORDINANCE INDIVIDUAL ESTABLISHING ESTABLISHING DISTRICT'S USER/ USER/AVAILABILITY BUDGETS APPROVE IN AVAILABILITY CHARGE PRINCIPLE FLAT CHARGE USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE AGAINST ADOPT ORDINANCE EACH PARCEL AND RECEIVE E FILE ESTABLISHING/ AUTHORIZE STAFF REPORT DESCRIBING AVAILABILITY TO PROCEED PROPERTY & CHARGE CHARGE TO BE LEVIED WAIVE PROVISIONS HEARING ON OF PURCHASING ESTABLISH PUBLIC REPORT RESOLUTION & HEARING DATE AUTHORIZE STAFF FOR REPORT TO PROCURE ADOPT REPORT NECESSARY MAT'LS, AND AUTHORIZE SUPPLIES 6 SVC'S COLLECTION OF TO IMPLEMENT USER USER/AVAILABILITY AVAILABILITY CHARGE ON TAX CHARGE BILL APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY SPRVSR RE FEES TO COLLECT USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE ON TAX BILL STAFF 1PREPARATION,AND REVIEW PROCESS OF INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT BUDGETS AND SUBMITTAL TO COUNTY AUDITOR SUPPORT -�- -' ACTIVITY I EDP PROGRAMMING S PROCESSING TO EXTRACT PARCELS FROM COUNTY ROLL TO PROVIDE FOR NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS EDP PROGRAMMING S PROCESSING TO PROVIDE PARCEL CHARGE TAPE TO COUNTY AUDITOR PRINTING OF NOTICE TO PROPERT OWNERS RE REPORT PUBLISH LEGAL NOTICES RE REPORT ADDRESS, SORT AND MAIL NOTICES PUBLISH ORDINANCE FILE ADOPTED BUDGETS WITH COUNTY AUDITORI i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ALL DISTRICTS TOTALED e*A' ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $219256,752,584. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 212,5679526. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0329 District Share of Taxes $ 7,013,438• Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 290199216. Total District Share of Taxes $ . 9,0329654• 1977-78 District Tax Levy 21 ,428,669• Potential Loss to Districts (58%) $ 1293969015. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1244029722476. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 149409,725• Districts Share of Tax Rate .0351 District Share of Taxes $ 5059781 . Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85,775• Total District Share of Taxes $ 5919556• 1977-78 District Tax Levy 193822548. Potential Loss to District (57%) $ 790t992• a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $69018,442,828. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 60,184,428. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0317 District Share of Taxes $ 1 ,907,846. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 4809116. Total District Share of Taxes $ 2,3879962. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 5,7299496. Potential Loss to District (58%) $ 3,341 ,534. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 • ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $7, 132,225,368. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 71 ,3222254. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0354 District Share of Taxes $ 295249808. ?o@*� Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 678,615. Total District Share of Taxes $ 392039423. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 799709515. Potential Loss to District (60%) $ 497679092. ,�q COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1 ,70094689484. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 17,004,685. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0341 District Share of Taxes $ 5799860. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 26,532• Total District Share of Taxes $ 606,392. 1977-78 District Tax Levy , 194972464. Potential Loss to District (60%) $ 8919072. lit COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $10214,426,020. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 12,144,260. Districts Share of Tax Rate •0272 District Share of Taxes $ 3309324• ewb� Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 319923. Total District Share of Taxes $ 3629247. 1977-78. District Tax Levy 8792992. Potential Loss to District.. (59%) $ 5179745• • T dh COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $2,250,102,072. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 229501 ,021 . Districts Share of Tax Rate .0291 District Share of Taxes $ 654,780. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 6319134. Total District Share of Taxes $ 11285,914. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 2,2389815• Potential Loss to District (43%) $ 9529901 . ' y r�1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1 ,500,1159336. Maximum Percentage Allowed :01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 1590019153• Districts Share of Tax Rate •0340 District Share of Taxes $ 5109039• Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85, 121 • Total District Share of Taxes $ 5959160. 1977--78 .D i s t r i ct Tax Levy 1 ,729,839. Potential Loss to District (66%) $ 19134,679• RESOLUTION N0. 78-109 � . � '' AGENDA ITEM- .�J, 15G AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-166 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 3, 5, 62 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 77-1660 AS AMENDED The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 22 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classification thereto, as set forth below: EXHIBIT 11B-2" SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL Approximate A"h Monthly Position Range Equivalent Positions Personnel Classification Classification No. Hourly Salary 1 1 Principal Adminstrative 1058A 9.73/12.11 1687/2099 AWe - Safety Section 2. That the first paragraph of Section 7 of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "The current organizational chart of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit "C", and dated July, 1978, Revised, is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution." Section 3. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective June 30, 1978. �*q PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. z cc uW W tY w z W • W z z w ac 1 J , y t W w vo zAMOS O y m L w W' = i O yxj f-0 as t 1 Z O W _ td Sit ZZ arL W I .. - Z t/f Z W Z W 1••t1C CD ow z ! Z ta uptoO.4 Q W ' IL W a ui W O d46O V F G W W t j W to =ZO. m N Z Wcc ... V W Z C9 W 2 g O i V s W W I+ N CC pi Zug F w W O W g a s u W in cc 91 $ �. m o u do U. J a O 4 0 pQ� aGcc w at t~j c 1�0• 4A O N Q W O IJ 1 W L••O CC Q�N �N WL6L) v WQ Q dCC W Z L&A� MC Lid C! J OwG cc Lo H J N �p O W V IL p,0 b d. m cc 2 O w O t3. 41 I _ N t� w N W Q ti h— 1 N to u J c N-i t.1 4 �N 1 a W IN H2 O v Z W Z v yccjN 46Jd Omd 1 MJ W O Nsw U N I - - - - -• Q N W U- ~ J cc CA U- Q cc N ?U f.d d Od d Z �N x� W W ww • 9 w aL fi tj41LAJ 0. i • WV O2.O J WO pO,Q 1. Qom. v< H LLI i J cc -i J f M J f..1 t1. 4n • J, Q N 4./ U.N a.0 Q W Z u z o to a. Z W O {ut ? d a 1 u N o to d a ¢ a 1 ti m W � t9 + ; 46 0 = u ! K u t z Q w to w C N Z ^ N Q C W M 1 } O h '.w0. f Q u W tC ac { osu • 1-wtw o w GA 0 cc 1 x V) -C G V 1 ..11 QOcc Lb4 b AGE111DA ITEM We 12(3) RESOLUTION NO. 78-106 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-166 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 20 3, 5, 60 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 77-166, AS AMENDED The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust salary ranges for position classifications therein, as set forth below: Approximate Monthly Equivalent Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary EXHIBIT "B-1" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL 10465 Personnel Assistant 1048A 5.62/7.00 974/1213 10550 Personnel Aide 1047A 5.32/6.63 922/1149 10555 Purchasing Aide 1047A 5.32/6.63 922/1149 EXHIBIT "B-2" SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 60010 Instrumentation Supervisor 1056F 9.02/11.23 1563/1947 �1 Approximate Monthly Equivalent Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary �* EXHIBIT "B-3" OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL 90335 Environmental Specialist 1053G 7.71/9.59 1336/1662 60230 Lead Instrumentation Technician 1053A 7.40/9.21 1283/1596 40100 Lead Pump Station Mechanic 1051C 6.72/8.37 1165/1451 50230 Machinist 1051C 6.72/8.37 1165/1451 80370 Laboratory Analyst III 1051B 6.67/8.31 1156/1440 80940 Control Center Clerk II 1046G 5.25/6.54 910/1134 • Part-Time Technician 7:50/hr. .Max. Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 75-166, as amended, be further amended to delete the following position classificiations therefrom. Approximate Monthly Equivalent Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Salary EXHIBIT 11B-3" OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL 60050 Sr. Instrumentation Foreman 1055F 8.54/10.63 1480/1843 Section 3. That the first paragraph of Section 7 of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "The current organizational chart of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit "C", and dated July, 1978., is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution." Section 4. That any other resolution or motion or• portions*thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section S. That this resolution shall become effective June 30, 1978. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. w7. W W cc W 2 Nl..w VV Ova wZF••. w"W u OC ' J J W oC W N w ' xZ O O W O _ •••x � N m n' + w x °C W ad 2_ O W W Z Z CIA L w y 0 1 Z Z 12 1 W w K aC w ow z a J Z Nx 4L41 Q w Q W 44 WO� ain ui �DO C u . CL n u N O Z w Z t9 � W W O i W 2tj C 1 u t7 w Z � w ~W G to d NLLS O Z J V M O go 2K ! } CIAJ inW m R �r = � u 0 u W ee m . m o a a N O ap N I 1 Q �' W O cc cc N W LA.t~.1 v wQ Q d N wz W¢ :aW N Z OOCC W LAJ N OO {Zjaw� Jp 0 co J m C OC cm N �"1 d x co d W O cc � M w Z O w CL Q cG O Vf cG u _ W ~ 3 wN u W"O L j H— H u w - J N u C OC Vf ' W LLIu w LL Vf N 2 y Q J z W cn _ N J p m or Vf cC =O w � MJ W O y� v{.� 2 �> J cG S �W f 0. W ¢o W s la.N x d W W ww w >W W F7-1= 3 bW Z u3c u V d O wq.3 u dip `--J W O 4Q N u W 1` W J cyC ' J Z M J u d OC 1 Q a0� Nu LQL V'f W d x UZ W o Vf O ;; oC _ ' u N cm Q Lik m MZ v x tm7 i L 6 .a O z c w Z 4. -cc J wN r Q LLIoC 0 4 J v i as Z w • rw� auw e�ivoi ouAi oe s 04 u re 1- w uw U.N ~ 36 W wd uv z NoQ ou T d Ael) y-Q JUNE 14, 1978 REPORT OF THE JOIBUT CHAIRMAN REPORT ON THE MEETING OF THE WEST COAST DISCHARGERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SEATTLE JUNE 7THI ALSO, YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON THE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS' FOLDERS UNDER THIS ITEM RE SENATOR CRANSTON1 ANNOUNCE THAT NO MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS BEING PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNEN EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, ^ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 11 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , June 14 , 19 78 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. ALL DISTRICTS Following a brief discussion regarding Waiving Provisions of the extremely tight time schedule that Purchasing Resolution re must be met if the Districts are to proceed implementation of flat with planning and procedures for implemen- rate special assessment tation of a flat rate special assessment (Alternative II) and immediate availability charge in accordance with the provisions of state law, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the provisions of the Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 are hereby waived and that the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to procure necessary materials, supplies and services, including postage, to proceed with implementation of said Alternative II. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June 19 78 . 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set hand his '4th day of June 19 78 / Se a ary 7f a Boards of Directors of Coun Sa tation Districts Nos. 2, 51 7, and 11 5-107 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , June 14 , 19 78 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:32 p.m. , June 14, 1978. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June , 1978 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set hand his 14th day of June 1978 j Se etary the Boards of Directors f Coun k ty Sari tation Districts Nos. 1 21 �b, 5, '6, 7, and 11 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., June 14 , 19 78 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting. of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DI^ RICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m. , June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors ' of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m. , June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:32 p.m. , June 14, 1978. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) - I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5; 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June , 19 78 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set hand this 14th day of June 1978 n SeCTeta y of/i e Boards of Directors �bf!Co y Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 2, S,' 6, 7, and 11 MEETING DATE June 14, 1978 TIME 7:30 p-m- DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 4)ISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS CRANK „• • .. ..RIMA. . . . .. . . RILEY ANTHONY -.�-- — . ..-._.—. WELSH . ... . . . .SHARP. . . . . . . . RILEY . • • • •....C'-ARt%-..-..— RILEY . . . . . . . .ANTHONY. . . . .. PERRY • • • • • •-•-•CULVER• ••••--- — ORTIZ�... .....EVANS--. . - -. ------ ----- ORT I Z • • ••• • ••-EVANS...... DISTRICT 2 COOPER •• • ••• • •FOX• • • •••.. COOPER • • • •• •••GAMBINA•••• _. FRIED) . . . . . . ..WEDAA- •••• HUTCHISON)• ••••GLOCKNER•• • RASHFORD). . . . .HOLT. . ..•• . . .. J r ROGET)... ..... .GRAHAM..... RILEY) . . . .. . . .C—tAR-K'• .. .... ✓ MEYER). . . . . . • • •GRIF FIN•••• — COOPER) . . .. . . .FOX.. .. . . . . . .,/ �RASHFORD). . . . . .HOLT. . .. . .. ROGET). . .. . .. .GRAHAM.. . .. . ✓ WELLS)• • • • • • • • •HOUSTON•• •• .WELLS)- -- --. . .HOUSTON• . - . - / LACAYQ)• • • • • • • •HUDSON• ••• • EVANS). . . . . ...ORTIZ• • • • • • • "" SEIT? t • • • • • • • •LAS?LO• • •• - CULV R)• -;• • • •PERRY• • • • • • •� ✓✓ RYCKOFF)• • • •• • •MC INNIS•• • ROTH .. . • • • • • •Sg*M . • . • . WEISHAUPT�• • • ••MILLER•• ••- HOYT • • • • • • • • •SMITH• • • • • • • 2- FINLAYSON • • • • •OLSON. . ... . � ADLER) - . ... . . .STANTON• •• . - ✓ EVANS). . . . .. . ..ORTIZ• • ••• • SHENKMAN)•. .. . . • • WINTERS) ••--••V .. . � PATTINSON CULVER . . . . . . . .PERRY• .-• • • DISTRICT 3 NYBORG • • • • •• • •PRIEST-• ••- ANTHONY) • • • • • • -RILEY•-. . . . ADLER • . • •. .• .SVALSTAD• • • - CRANK)• • - • •••• •RIMA• • • •• • - MEYER)•• • ••• • •GRIFFIN• • • • • ✓ YOUNG)• • • • • •- ••ROGET• •• • • - PERRY) . . - .• . -.CULVER• • ••. . HUMMEL)• • • •••••RYCKOFF• ••- COOPER) •• •• • •.GAMBINA• • • - • ✓ WELSH)•-• • •••• •SALTARELLI- LACAYQ)• • •• • • •HUDSON• • • • • • '' RILEY).. . .. . •. •SCHMIT• • • • • SEITZII . . .. . . . .LASZLO• • • • • • (ROTH).. . . .. ... .SEYMOUR•• • • WEISHAUPT . . ..MILLER. . . . . . ✓ WELSH)... ...•••SHARP• • ••• • FINLAYSON .. ..OLSON. . . . ... BAILEY) SHENKMAN EVANS) . . . . . .. .ORTIZ• •- . ... P .. • NYBORG) . .. . .. .PRIEST-. .. . - � SHENKMAN) • •• •• •SIEBERT•• • • HOYT)).. ... ... . .SMITH• •••• • YOUNG •ROGET• . �. . - ADLER) STANTON . . . ... • RILEY - . . . . .. .SCHMIT . . . . . RYCKOFF) STRAUSS . .. .... . . . . ROTH).• . . . .. . . .&EYMBVR. . . - - ✓ ADLER) SVALSTAD SHENKMAO. . . ..SIEBERT. . . . . ✓ • • . . . .. .• . . • • ZOMMICKII-•. . . . .SYLVIA. . . .. , ✓ ZOMMICK)• • • •- • •SYLVIA• • • • • " VELASQUEZ) . ...WINTERS... .. GAIDO)-•• •• • • • •VARDOULIS• - ✓ WINTERS)• • •••••VELASQUEZ• - DISTRICT 5 RYCKOFF)• • .....WEDAA• • •• •- WILLIAMS.- NUMMEL • • • •• ••RYCKOFF=• • • • - • FF / IVELASQUEZ)• • • • .,,I;ITERS•.•- �._ ANTHONY� ••• •••RILEY• • • -•• - RYCKO • • •• • •STRAUSS• •• • • ' OTHERS DISTRICT 6 / HARPER... .. ✓ (RYCKO F . . . .. .MC I NN I S. .. . ✓ �I°L' SYLVESTER.. ✓ iCRANK . . . .. .. .R I MA.. . ... •. ✓ ''f•` LEWIS. . ..o. RILEY) . .. . .oo-ANTHONY. .. CLARKE. .. .. BROWN... . .. DISTRICT 7 GAIDO ... • ••• •VARDOULIS•• � WOODRUFF. .. HOYT) .. . . . ... .SMITH. • • • • • • HOHENER.. .. • RILEY Cam-- HOWARD.. . .. � ORTIZ) 000ivl HUTCHISON) • • • •GLOCKNER. . . HUNT-.....- WELSH) -•• • •• -•SALTARELLI • • KEITH. ..... f KENNEY.. .. RYCKOFF)• • • • •.WILLIAMS• • • LYNCH. . .. . .. DISTRICT 11 MADDOX- -. . . MARTINSON. . BAILEY . . . . . . .SHENKMAN. . , . ✓ PIERSALL. . . SHENKMAN}. .. - .PATTINSON . , G� STEVENS. .. . RILEY) .• ..•.. •SCHMIT• -�• - y TRAVERS. . .. 6/14/73 MEETING DATE June 14, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 192,32S,697 & 11 V I STR I CT 1 JOINT BOARDS lbto� R CRANK ... .... .RIMA. . . .. . .. = RILEY .. . . . ... .ANTHONY.... WELSH))... .. . . .SHARP. . . . . . .✓. RILEY . . .... . .ANTHONY. . . . .. �' PERRY • • .• •-c.. .CULVER. .... —� -` ORTIZ .. ... ...EVANS.. .. . . _- --- ORTIZ • • • ••• •••EVANS•••••• DISTRICT 2 COOPER • • • •• • • •Fox••• • •-•- COOPER • • • • • •• •GAMBINA••--�_ FRIED) • • • •• •• •WEDAA• - ..... HUTCH I SON) •• •••GLOCKNER•••JG_ RASHFORD). . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . . ROGET)••- • ••• • •GRAHAM• •• ••_� �RASHFORD)- - o - - oHOLTo - - o- -o .. .._�.G RILEY) . . . . . . . .. . .••••--� FIN � COOPER) .. .. . . .FOX• • • • • • • • •_� ROGET). . . . . . . .CRAHAM. . . . .._�. WELLS)• • • • • • • • •HOUSTON• • ••—� .WELLS)... .. . . .HOUSTON. . . . . +� . . . . . . . . . . . . .�/. LACAYQQ) HUDSON EVANS)• • • • • • • •ORTIZ• • • • • • • SEITZ).= • •• • - • • •LAS.7_LO• • • • •�— CULV R)• •• • • • •PERRY. • • • • • • RYCKOFF)• • •• • • •MC INNIS• ••_� ROTH . . .. . . . . . .S{ . . . . . ,�— WEISHAUPT�•. . . .MILLER. . . . . HOYT ... . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . . _ FINLAYSON . .. . .OLSON• • ••• •_.�. ADLER) • • •• • ••.STANTON. ... . EVANS)• •• •• • -• •ORTIZ• • • •- • _ • WINTERS) ... . .. . . i be a ITKM�AiN 1-000 . 0 .PA — CULVER�•• • • • • ••PERRY• • • • ••_,� DISTRICT 3 NYBORG . . .o . . . •PRIEST• • • • •__,G ANTHO�Y)• • • •• • •RILEY•• • • ••_� RDLER) o. . . . o.•SVALSTAD. . • . 1EYER) GRIFFIN CRANK • •• • • • • • •RIMA• •• •• • •JG . . . . ... . . . . . ._� YOUNG). . . . ... . -ROGET. . . . .-�_ PERRY) . . . . . . . .CULVER. . .• • •_,G HUMMF )--• ••• .•RYCKOFF•• •• _ COO PER) • • •• . ••GAMBINA• • • • •_,G -WELSH ••• ••••••SALTARELLI•�G• LACAYQ)• • • •• • •HUDSON• • • • • • RILEY . . . •. ..• .SCHMIT• • -••_,G, SEITZI) .. .• • • • •LASZLO• • • • • -_.].•. ROTH). . .. WEISHAUPTJ • • ••MILLER• •••- •_♦� WELSH)• • -•• ••• •SHARP• • •• ••_ FINLAYS ON . • ••OLSON•• • • •• • BAILEY)• • • ••• • •SHENKMAN• --�G EVANS) . . . . . . . .ORTIZ.. . . .•. V SHEN MAN) •••- • •SIEBERT••••l_ NYBORG) . .. ....PRIEST. . . .•._ HOYT SMITH YOUNG .. . . .. . .ROGET. • . • • .•_� ADLER) STANTON _ e RILEY . .. . . . . .SCHMIT. . . . . . - STANTON F)• • •••• •STRAUSS• • ••�_ ROTH) .• •• •• • -• • • • • •_� ADLER SVALSTAD / __.� ZOMMICK)•- • • . • •SYLVIA ...�` SHED:KMA[V). ... .S I EBERT. . . . . .. . .... . . ... ZOMMICK .. . . .SYLVIA. . . . . . GAIDO)• •• • •• • • •VARDOULIS•- VELASQUEZ) . . . .WINTERS.. . .. � . . . . . .. -�. . ._ FRIED • • • ••••••WEDAA- • -• -- DISTRICT 5 RYCKOFF). ....o •WILLIAMS• •- HUMMEL - • • •• ••RYCKOFF•• •• -JG. —. VELASQUEZ)• .• • .,,'I:iTERS. • -•_� ANTHONY� • • -R I LEY• • • • • •• RYCKOFF • ••• •-STRAUSS- .. .. OTHERS DISTRICT 6 HARPER. .. .. RYCKOFF . . .. . .MC INNIS. . .._� SYLVESTER.. CRANK).. .. . .. . .RIMA.. . . . . .. o ~_ LEWIS. . .. . . RILEY) . ... ... .ANTHONY CLARKE.. ... BROWN... . .. DISTRICT 7 GAIDO •• . • ••• •VARDOULIS•• - WOODRUFF.. . N HOYT) •• •• • •- • •SMITH•• • • • •. 0, HOHENER. .. . R I LEY) . . .. ..o-46A{*. . . . . . . ✓ •EVANS Ov HOWARD.. . . . ORTIZ) . . . . . . . HUTCHISON) • • ••GLOCKNER•• •• � U ..• . o • o '� ------- KE I TH.. . ... WELSH) •• • • •• • -SALTARELLI • . ✓ KENNEY.. ... IRYCKOFF). . .. .oWILLIAMS- oo . LYNCH. . . . . . DISTRICT 11 MADDOX. . . . . MARTINSON. . BAILEY . . . . . . ,SHENKMANa PIERSALL. . . �SHENKMAN). . . . .PATTINSO�: *. . �� STEVENS. . . . RILEY) • •••••••SCHMIT• • • • • • ✓ TRAVERS. . . . 6/14/73 June 14 , 1978 Joint Mtg. OWN (7a) Report of the Joint Chairman Saltarelli reported that he and Mr. Harper went to Seattle on June 7th to a meeting of the West Coast dischargers re secondary treatment. (Saved $48 by sleeping in same room with FAH) He then read the memo in the Directors ' folders signed by him and letter he wrote to Senator Cranston. Said the State Water Resources Control Board really supported our points there. Announced that there would not be a meeting of the Executive Committee this month. (7b) Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper referred to the booklet in the Directors' folders from the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Was written by Commissioners in laymen' s language to get some of the points across from their studies. Briefly reported on supplemental agenda items: Item 17 (a) Opened bids on Warehouse Office Expansion. Four bids came in considerably over estimate of architect. We are recommending rejecting all bids and later when we feel there is a little better bidding, will go out again to receive bids. Item 24 (a) Have a request from the City of Costa Mesa for a permit easement. District 6 actually owns the right of way in fee. Are recommending it be a permit rather than an actual easement because there is some value there. Item 26 (a) & (b) Re District 7 items, these are two annexations that LAFC has approved and we are recommending that we proceed with them. Item 28 (a) We opened bids Wednesday (6/13) on two sewer projects and we are recommending that this be awarded. It is over the engineer' s estimate but staff feels that the engineer ' s estimate was rather low. Cost of the pipe is what drove the price up. Item 28 (b) Also recommending annexation be approved. LAFC has approved. (7c) Report of the General Counsel TLW said he had nothing to report. Were a couple of items on the agenda which he would report on later. (12) Items recommended by E.C. Joint Chairman Saltarelli cast a unanimous ballot for items (4) & (5) in lieu of a roll call vote. (6) ALL DISTRICTS - added this item to agenda Re Jarvis-Gann, reported they just completed a meeting prior to Joint meeting and asked Chairman of the Board of Supervisors (Riley) if they were going to allocate any money to the Sanitation Districts because of our inability to levy taxes. Chairman Riley said there had been some discussion regarding this but haven't been any decisions made. It may OWN even go to the ballot in November. Possibly is very possible as far as this District is concerned. Saltarelli added then that we may get anywhere from a certain percentage to zero. Will lose $21 million of our budget. Can only put debt service on tax roll. Need to raise $19 million. Are two methods to accomplish this . One method to fund to fund 78/79 requirements would be to establish a flat rate availability user charge on the tax bill. Can apply user charge after the first year. To accomplish this we must have all the /'► information to the County Auditor by August loth which will require we hold a special Board meeting next week on an ordinance that will be implemented for establishment of a flat rate user charge. Other method is to continue to levy full tax rate on basis of County Counsel' s opinion that the District charges a special assessment and not a tax. Saltarelli said it was their recommendation tonight that they direct Counsel to proceed in obtaining an opinion as to whether we can go with that alternative and at the same time be prepared to move ahead with the flat rate charge. Only other alternative is to not collect any money and use money from reserves. Will lose $6 million in interest plus the $21 million. Sharp stated that Saltarelli explained it very clearly. If we did this, would be sure to explain it in a way that was understandable to the taxpayers. Ryckoff added Board asking for Alternative 3 & 2 assuming that we aren' t going to spend our balances and assuming that we are going to put something on the tax bill. If we do alternative 2 , will be realizing "V Dollars and if we do alternative 3, will be realizing about the same. We will be reclassifying what households pay under #2 . Seems better to do what we have always done. Sharp stated that there would be an 18% increase on his house if flat rate charged rather than have it vary according to use. Svalstad asked regarding tax rate if we didn't lower it, how much would we recoup? Saltarelli stated that Jarvis-Gann will put tax rates back to 75/76 . Will have to raise the tax rate accordingly. If we call it a tax, run into some SB 90 problems because some Districts are at their maximum. If we go on basis that it is not a• tax, then can say it is not subject to SB 90 . Said #3 is challengeable. Somebody could file a suit. Are going to have tobe prepared to go to user charge for one year. Will be inequitable for one year but will be corrected the follow- ing year on the user basis. Rima asked what plan the Fiscal Policy Committee backed. Saltarelli answered that they felt that we should meet requirements to do Alternative 2 by August loth and also Direct the General Counsel to proceed with Alternative 3 . If that comes through, won't have to finish Alternative 2. Want to eliminate Alternative 1. Saltarelli asked how we could raise the tax. TLW said since it is not a tax, not really within rules of Jarvis-Gann. Holt reported further regarding conversation at earlier meeting that evening. This is something we can' t afford to overlook. If we go with Plan 2 or 3, have to take a real strong look at operating budget and capital projects proposed and cut the things that are nice to have and consider the ones we have to have. Have to have this information to defend our position on 2 or 3 . -2- Saltarelli reiterated that the Fiscal Policy Committee selected Alternative 3 to keep it on tax rolls as special assessment but be prepared with Alternative 2 to go with flat rate. Need direction tonight from Board to have staff proceed in that manner. , Svalstad asked re budgets, if we approve this concept, what can we do to cut these things in the budgets? Can we change anything later? FAH referred to the fund sheet of the goldenrod report in Directors ' folders. Have cut the joint construction and operation budget by $1'k million over last year. In addition to that the staff will attempt to operate at $1 million less in each of the budgets. If we start approaching $7 . 7 million expenditures this coming year, we will come back to Directors asking for some adjustments. Recommend this approach rather than cut the budget $1 million now. Don't think that there is much of a problem with CORF; however, these numbers will be cranked back into individual Districts and at that point can jog around. Saltarelli stated that to cut our budgets, must cut the flow. Most feasible way to set up system to cut flow. Other method is to is to go to individual District budgets for capital funds and delay or cancel individual projects. In doing that will be cutting off new service connections for some years down the road. Very difficult to cut here as dealing with essential services. Vardoulis asked about higher connection fees in areas where there is a considerable amount of growth. Was answered that yes, that could be done in any District. Will know more later. Saltarelli stated that they needed a motion from someone to authorize the staff to proceed as discussed. It was so moved and seconded. ( Saltarelli then referred to timetable for actions required. Set June 22nd as the date for an adjourned joint meeting at 6 : 00 p.m. TLW said this will be a short meeting to introduce ordinance and to provide individual mailed notices to every owner in Orange County. Hearing on July 18th will be to consider protests, etc. Probably would have opinion of County Counsel before then which would allow County Auditor to proceed on ad valorem charge in lieu of flat rate. Saltarelli added that in order to meet this time schedule, staff will not be able to go out for bids to get company to do EDP work. Need authority to waive provisions of reso to go out to bid. It was moved and seconded to amend existing motion to include waiving portion of resolution requiring District to go out to bid. Directors wondered where to hold hearing. Had a hand vote and decided to hold it at Districts ' office. Discussed whether to hold it July 18th or 19th. Voted on July 19th by a show of hands, at 6 :00 p.m. FAH advised that staff will be mailing out postcards but won't be that much information so will be taking out some ads in local newspaper to explain why the charge and the positions behind it. If we do a good Job in this area, probably won't be many people at hearing. Are three Districts that have a rather high charge--Districts 5, 7 and 11. Are getting updated parcel map. -3- Svalstad asked if we are going to explain what will happen to construction in certain areas if it wasn' t approve? Answered yes. Williams asked if they could have a choice of June 22 or 21st for adjourned meeting. By show of hands only four couldn't come June 22 so did not change date. i Called for VOICE VOTE ON MOTION. Motion carried. Graham asked why we didn't have June 30th deadline like cities. TLW said if we go on alternative 2 or 3 , will be outside of Jarvis-Gann. If we proceed with ad valorem rate, not within Jarvis-Gann. If we go with alternate 2 establishing a service charge, is not a tax and, therefore, June 30 does not make any difference. Graham asked what if County Counsel determines that it's atax? TLW said maybe by proceeding with variable rate, somebody might challenge it. Said he didn't have any difficulty with proposed service charge here but can't guarantee some taxpayer won't serve us with a lawsuit. Think there is a minimal risk. (J4) Nomations for Joint Chairman & Vice Joint Chairman Olson nominated Saltarelli for Joint Chairman and Fox for Vice Joint Chairman. Motion seconded. Moved nominations be closed. Seconded. Called for the question. Voice vote. Motion carried. TLW pointed out that the actual election will be in July. Rules of Procedure do not allow taking nominations from floor in July unless /► resolution passed setting aside rules . (30) DISTRICT 11 - Coast Highway Trunk Sewer REL .referred to staff report in Directors ' folders re Coastal Commission deniel' to build Coast Highway Trunk. Said .the matter was set aside for two weeks because the Coastal Commission meeting and the City Council meeting were the same day. Staff has received all approvals from various agencies, Fish & Games, etc. These were all submitted to Commission. Their main concern was Master Plan alignment and Bolsa Chica area. Permit was for only up to Lake Street but denial was based on Master Plan. If not built, a major portion of drainage area west of Newland and south of Garfield will be a problem. Will keep Directors informed of progress. Meeting will be in two weeks . Shenkman stated that he would have the City Council and staff meet with District staff before the Coastal Commission meeting. -4-