The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-06-14 OCRCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 7, 1978 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2J 3J SJ 6J 7 & 11 WEDNESDAYJ JUNE 14J 1978 -7:3Q P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEYJ CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled upcoming meetings: DISTRICT NO. 2 Wednesday, June 21, 1978, at 7:30 p.m. at the Brea City Hall '..! EXECUTIVE C0~~1ITTEE -None Scheduled Month June July August September October November December January February March April May June .COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS or ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMIT'f~E MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Meeting Date Committee Meeting Date June 14, 1978 None Scheduled July 12, 1978 July 26, 1978 Aug 9, 1978 None Scheduled Sep 13, 1978 Sep 27, 1978 Oct 11, 1978 Oct 25, 1978 Nov 8, 1978 Nov 22, 1978 v Dec 13, 1978 None Scheduled Jan 10, 1979 Jan 24, 1979 Feb 14, 1979 Feb 28, 1979 Mar 14, 1979 Mar 28, 1979 Apr 11, 1979 Apr 25, 1979 May 9, 1979 May 23, 1979 June 13, 1979 June 27, 1979 G'-· ·BOARDS OF DIRECTOnS County Sonitotion Districts of Orange County, Coliforni• Post Office eo,. 11127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Tele~s: JOINT BOARDS Ano Code 71 ~ 540-2910 ~62-2~11 AGENDA MEETING DATE JUNE 14J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, . (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Cnairmen pro tem, if nece~saxy (4) Recognition of special guests (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file n:.inute excerpts DISTRICT 3 (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from ITEMS OH the following city regarding election of mayor and appointment of SUPPlEMENTAl AGENDA alternate, and s eating new members of the Board: (*Mayor) City District Active Alternate Seal Beach 3 Frank J. Laszlo* Herald Kent Seitz (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 May 10, 1978, regular District. 2 May 10, 1978, regular District 3 May 10, 1978, regular District s May 10, 1978, regular District 6 May 10, 1978, regular District 7 -May 10, 1978, regular District 11 -May 10, 1978, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS v . (8) ALL.DISTRICTS · ROLL CALL vorr._ ... __ cons~d~ration ~f :o~l call. vot7 motion ratifying pnymen~ of claims of ; the Joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall i be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each I i , ~ 1 , I i \ l ! l I ~ i I I l i j ~ ·1 1 I ! I J 1 1 ~ j . i i i ; . i l .1 1 ! i t '-"" District represented. unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page (s) · "A" I "C" and CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND -See page C.s) "A" I "C" and DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" I "D" and DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" I "D" and DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) ·~B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE ~ (9) ALL DISTRICTS Ron Cati Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(AA) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consen~ calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifjcnlly removed from same. -2- "E" "E" "F" "F" -• (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (b) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman and General Manager at a meeting of ocean dischargers in Seattle, Washington, on June 8, 1978, in connection with regulations re waiver of secondary treatment requirements; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by American Standard Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $8,600.48 against C. H. Leavell & Co., contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75· MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $1,591.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Van Diest Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,100.00 against Skipper & Company, contract for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of the following surplus District vehicles in the most cost-effective manner: One 1962 Dodge One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle.#23) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #52) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #53) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #61) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #62) One 1968 International 24,000 GVW Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #73) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-104, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-062, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 11, 1978) See page "G" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-105, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, to Pxoductior~Steel Co., Inc. in the amount of $16, 135. 00. See pages "H" · and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; waive the irregularity in connection with submission of a bid bond; and award Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-093, to James P. Kinney Company in the amount of $5,950.55. See page "J" (j) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No.·J-13-2, clarifying the requirements for the sprinkler modification as required by the Building Code and changing the bid date from June 1 to June 13, 1978. (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, granting a time extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company due to inclement weather. See page "K" DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-111-2 , approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, for a lump swn fee of $8,400.00, in accordance with the procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services. See page "L" (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, authorizing an addition of $3,380.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to replace asphalt bike trail and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $2,300.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for filling of temporary sewer with a mud jacking material and granting a time extension of 9 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "N" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-112-2 , accepting Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "0" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- • (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (p) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, allowing the use of reinforced concrete pipe as an alternate to the vitrified clay pipe, and incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing their right-of-way (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing of their right-of-way (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No .• 78-113-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .755 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, proposed Annexation No. 32 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Bernard Guy for annexation of approximately .5 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim ; and Standard Resolution No. 78-114-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed .Annexation No. 33 -Guy Annexation to.County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "P" · (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Warmington Development, Inc. and The Baldwin Company for annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located approximately one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of .Yorba Linda, and refer to staff for study and reconunendation, proposed Annexation No. 34 -Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "Q'' (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and award a contract in an amount not to exceed $12,600.00 for application of zebron coating to manholes on Cypress Avenue Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-9, to repair damages caused by discharge from Collier Chemical Company (Said cost to be reimbursed by Collier Chemical Company) DISTRICT 3 (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-116-3 , approving plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 27, 1978) See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- • (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (w) Consideration of motion authorizingGene~al Manager to negotiate and award a contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for repair of manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-lR-4, in an amount not to exceed $45,000 DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statement for the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period from March 28, 1975, through June 30, 1977. DISTRICT 7 (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-117-7 , ordering annexation of 12.531 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hill Street in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 71 -Tract No. 9615 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-118-7, ordering annexation of 1.156 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda, proposed Annexation No. 72 -Stansell Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (aa) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Edgewater Development Company for annexation of 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "5" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1) Staff report on Joint Works Budgets (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Fiscal Policy Committee recommending adoption of Joint Works Budgets and personnel requirements (3) Consideration of motion approving 1978-79 personnel Roll can Vote or Cast requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 78-106, Unanimous Ballot amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 (4) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the ROLL CALL von__ 1978-79 Joint Operating Budget (5) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint R~lL CALL VOTE. Works Construction) -~~,,Le: (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1978, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1978-79 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts (14) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "T" :,..cc1lrrv ~1 1 t 4 ~ (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items re implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage: (Approved 5/10/78 by Boards) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re administration of self-insurance plans. See page "U" Roll Call Vote or Cast (b) Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 78-107, adopting settlement. procedures for liability claims. See page "V" (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Carl Warren & Company for liability claims administration services, and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement for said services in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "W" (~tem 15 continued on page 8) -7- (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Item 15 continued from page 7) (d) (e) Roll CJll Vote or Cast Unanimo us Ballot (f) (g) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (h) Consideration of motion authorizin g the staff to direct the Districts' insura nce broker to place an umbrella liability policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $300,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $33,750 Consideration of Resolution No . 78-108, establishin gprogram of legal self-insurance re workers' compensation and authorizing a trust account to accommodate admi nistration of workers' compensation claims. See page "X" Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an excess workers ' compensation policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,00 0 ,000 for claims in excess of $100,000 primary self-insurance ret ention, for a total premium not to exceed $20,000 Consideration of Resolution No. 78-109, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, establishing the position of Principal Administrative Assistant -Safety, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for workers' compensation claims administration services, in form approved by the General Counsel, subject to approval of selection of s·aid firm by the Fiscal Policy Cammi ttee (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report re status of sludge disposition problem. See page "Y" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of a Reconditioned Pettibone, Mode l SM790, Speed Mixer, Specification No . A-092, for sludge composting, in an amount not to exceed $51,000 plus tax and freight (17) ALL DISTRICTS Othe r business and communications or supplemental agenda it~ms (17-a) Con s ideration of Re solution No . 78-110, r e jecting a ll bids for Roll Call Vote or Ca st Wa r e h ou se Office Expa n s i on, Job No. J -13-2 , and a ut ho r i zing the Una nimous Ball ot Ge nera l Mana ger t o e t bl · h b · d d ~ b · d ITEMS ON S s a i s a 1 ate ror r e J. of said proj e ct. SUPPLEMENTALACENOA ee p age s "I" and "II" lHSJ vISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supp lemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn ·,Y(.. (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ r ,. -8- (22) DISTRICT 5 Other bus i ness and communic a tions or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT S 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (/ ,'J (24) DISTRICT 6 Roll Call Vot e or C~~t .Unan imous Ballo t (2 4-a) Other business and commwtications or supplemental agenda items ITT MS O N SUPPLEll.ENTA L AC::N DA. Considerat ion o f Res o lution No . 78 -120-6, authorizing execut ion of Gr ant o f Easement to the City o f Costa Mesa f or c ons t r uc t ion of storm dr ain by'-Ci ty. See p age "Il l" (25) l '11L.. !I .j ,,-,- DISTRICT 6 .J< '1 Consideration of motion to adjourn \'i (26) DISTRICT . 7 Othe r bus iness and communications or supplemental agenda items (26-a ) Ron Call Vote or Cast Un animous Ballo t ITE MS O N SUPPL EMENTAL AGENDA (26-b) · Roll Call Vote or Cast ll na nimou s Ballo t • \Tc MS ON SUPPLEMENTAi. AGENDA Con sideration of Standard Res o lution No. 78-121-7, orde r ing annexation o f 40.820 acres of territory to the Distri ct in the vicinity south- westerly of the terminus of Catalina Street in the City of Orange, p r oposed Annexation No. 70 -Tract No . 967 0 t o County Sanitation Dis t ric t No . 7. Board authorized initiation of proceedings Februar y 8, 1978. Conside r ation of Standard Res o lution No . 78 -122-7, orderin g annexat ion o f 2 .18 a cres of territory to the District i n the vicinity of the southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, p r opo sed Annexa t ion No. 74 -Nelson Annexation t o County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed t o the 70th Sewer Maintenance Di s t r i c t) Boa r d authorized initiation o f p r oceedings Mar ch 8, 1978 . (2°7) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda i tems (28-a) Roll Ca ll Vote or Cast .Unanimou s Ball ot ITT MSOH SU PPLE MENTAL AG ENDA (28-b) Roll Call Vot e or Ca st .Unanim ous Ball ot ITE MS ON SUPPLEM ENT AL AGE NDA Consider ation o f Resolution No. 78-115 -2 , to receiv e and file bid t abulation and recommendation and awardi ng contract to Christeve Co rporat ion for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, in the amo wit of $514,204.00; and for Orchard (Ke l logg) Sub -Trunk, Cont ract No . 2 -20 , i n t he amo wtt of $235,006.00 . See pages "IV" and "V" Co nsiderat ion o f Standard Re s olution No. 78-119-2, ordering annexation of 142 .144 acres o f territo ry to the District i n the vicinit y northeast of t he City of Yorba Linda in the Chino Hi lls area, proposed Anne xat ion No. 21 -Upper K Ranch Annexation to Cowt t y San i tat ion Di s t r i c t No. 2 . Board au t hori z e d i n i tia t i on of proceedi n gs May 11 , 19 77. (29J DIS TR ICT 2 Considera tion of mot i on to adjourn to 7 :30 p .m., Jwie 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall (30) DI STRICT 11 Verbal staff r eport r e Coas t a l Co mmis sion pepnit application for Co as t Highway Tr unk Se wer , Re aches 1 and 2 (Co astal Co mmi s s ion h e ari n g -Monday, Jwte 12, 197 8 ) . (31) DISTRICT 11 Other bu s i ness a nd c omm wtica t i ons or supp l emental age nda i tems, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Cons i de r a t i on of mot i on to adjourn l ~ 1 -9- ... --.. , ' I . BOARDS OF DJRECTOnS County Sonitotion Districts of Orange County, Colifornia Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Te lept,or.e.: JOINT BOARDS Ano Code 7U 3'0-2910 762-2'11 AG EH DA MEETING DATE JUNE 14J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTO R DESI RING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGE NDA ITEMJ PLE AS E CALL THE MAN AGER OR APPROPRIATE DEP AR TM EN l HEA D. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILA BLE AT I :00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDN ESDAY 'S MEETING IN THE CO NFERENCE ROOM ADJ OI NING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROO M. . (I) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Cliairmen pro tem, if nece~sary (4) Recognition of special guests ADJOURNi!.'.:NTS P:.'STED •• .r co· ·r ~ : .. 1L£1,cE ... ~ ..•. m~s ~rr ur .......... ~..... · llfSG~Lll '·i':' CERTIHED./ <tT• " " "-r.,•1 ./ • L" IL : •••• • 1, _ '· ............ . MltffiES Wll:TTU( .. ~ ... . . v-- MINUTES HLED ................. . FILE ................. (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts ·LETTER ............ .. A/C •..• TKlR •... DISTRICT 3 ~v.~~N (5) SUPPlEMENTAt AGENDA Ccn s ideration of motion to recei ve and file minute e xcerpt from the followin g city regarding ele ction oi mayor and appointment of alternate, and seating nt:w members of the Board: (*Mayor) (6) ft\\.~ City Seal Beach EACH DISTRICT District 3 Active Frank J. Laszlo* Alternate Herald Kent Seitz Con s ideration of motions approving minute s of the following meetings, as mailed : ·• ; (8) ALL DISTRICTS RCLL CALL VOTE ... '"--Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying pnyment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall rt\\~ be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each ~ District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) · "A" "C" and CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND -See page(s) "A" I "C" and DISTRICT NO. l NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" I "D" and DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" I "D" and DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) ·~B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(AA) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consen~ calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * • * * * • * * * * * Chairman will determine if :my items are to be delet'ed from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifjcnlly removed from same. -2- "E" "E" "F" "F" (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FI LE ···········-··-· LETIER ···-- A/C .... TKLR •••• f ll.f --·--· mTEl -- A/C ...• TKlR - ---··-·•a.•- '....--.---··-·- FILE --··-········ LETIER~.~ A/C ••.. TKLR .... ~--··········· FILE ..•.............•• LETIER~./ A/C .... TKLR •••• FILE ................. . LETIE Rt~.~ A/C .... TKLR .... FI LE ···············- LETIER ............ .. A/C .... TKLR ...• ·--·-•••·•••••••••••-o • .... -.................... - FILE .•...............• LffiER ......•.....•• A/C.~-~ ~ ....... ~ ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in conne ction therewith (b) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman and General Manager at a meeting of ocean dischargers in Seattle, Washington, on June 8, 1978, in connection with regulations re waiver of secondary treatment requirements; and authorizing reimbursement of expen ses incurred in conn e ction therewith (c) Consideration of motion to r eceive and file Stop Notice submitted by American Standard Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $8,600.48 against C. H. Leavell & Co., cont ractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 · MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-23-3 (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $1,591.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitte d by Van Diest Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,10 0.00 a ga inst Skipper & Company, contract for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (f) Consideration of mot i on a uthori z ing the di s p o sition of the following surplus District vehicles in the most cost-effective manner: One 1962 Dodge One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #23) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #52) One 1965 International One -Ton Cab & Chas s is (Vehicl e #53) On e 1966 Ford On e-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #61) One 1966 Ford On e -H a lf Ton Pickup (V e hicle #6 2) One 1968 Interna tional 24,000 GVW Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #73) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-104, approving plans a nd specificati ons for Miscellaneous Pa ving at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No. PW-062, and authorizing the General Man a ger to establish the dat e for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 11, 1978) Se e page "G" Conside r a tion of Resolution No. 78-105, to receive and file bid tabulation and recomme ndation and awarding contract for Modifi c ation of Existing Sludge Hopp er Outlet Port at Rec lam ation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, to P~oductio~ Steel Co., Inc. in the amount of $16,135.00. See page s "H" ·and "I" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on p a ge 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ~--~- LITTER ............ . ~,:~ ...-.-.·-·- FILE .•..........•...•• LETIER ············- A/C •..• TKLR -- FILE ·········--··- LITTER·---- A/C ••.. TKLR - (W). .... 4- (~ ...... - A/C •.•• TKLR - ~~ ~-8_:-__ . FILE ...•.•..•...•..••• LETTER ········-- A/C .... TKLR -· FI LE ................. . LETIE R ············- A/C •..• TKLR - ----- ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recomm en dation; waive the irregularity in connection with submission of a bid bond; and award Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-093, to James P. Kinney Company in the amount of $5,950.55. See page "J" (j) Conside ration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No . J-13-2, clarifying the requirements for the sprinkler modification as required by the Building Code and changing the bid date from June 1 to June 13, 1978. (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-23-6, granting a time extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company due to inclement weather. See page "K" DISTRICT 2 (1) (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-111-2 , approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No . 2-6R, for a lump sum fee of $8,400 .00, in accordance with the procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services. See page "L" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Or a nge Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, authorizing a n addition of $3,380.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to replace asphalt bike trail and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 2 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No . 2-5R, authorizing an addition of $2 ,300 .00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for filling of tempora ry sewer with a mud jacking material and granting a time extension of 9 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "N" Consideration of Resolution No. 78-112-2 , accepting Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-5R, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "0" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) FILE ···-············• LETTER •..•..•..•..•. A/C .... TK LR •... --- FILE ···········-··- LETTER ···--··- A/C .... TKLR -· ,,,....--.) () •!./"' ~ LEITER .. ~_:_).;; FILE ·······-········· LETTER ·······-····· A/C ... ~-~ .. ! ... ~ (p) Consideration of motion app roving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifi cations for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, allowing the use of reinforced concrete pipe as an alternate to the vitrified clay pipe, and incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing their right-of-way (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans a.nd specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub -Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing of their right-of-way (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78 -11 3 -2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .755 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, proposed Annexation No. 32 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Bernard Guy for annexation of approximately .5 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim; and Standard Resolution No. 78-114-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 33 -Guy Annexation to .County Sanitation District No . 2. See page "P" Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Warmington Development, Inc. and The Baldwin Co mpany for annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located approxim ately one-half mile northeast of the future intersect ion of Yorba Linda Drive and Vi llage Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 34 -Tract No . 10011 to County Sanitation District No . 2. See page "Q" (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and award a contract in an amount not to exceed $12,600.00 for application of zebron coating to manholes on Cypress Avenue Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2 -9, to repair damages caused by discharge from Collier Chemica l Company (Said cost to be reimbursed by Collier Chemical Company) DIST RICT 3 (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-11 6 -3, approving plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Forc e Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Te ntative bid date: July 27, 1978) See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- • (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) ~-----~ ~~< ......... . A/C .... TKLR .••• ~~-- ~::-~ .... FILE ................ .. LETIER ····--- A /C .... TKLR .... DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (w) Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to negotiate and award a contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for repair of manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-lR-4, in an amount not to exceed $45,000 DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statement for the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period from March 28, 1975, through June 30, 1977. DISTRICT 7 (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-117-7 , ordering annexation of 12.531 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hill Street in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 71 -Tract No. 9615 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 7.8-118-7, ordering annexation of 1.156 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda, proposed Annexation No. 72 -Stansell Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (aa) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from g.&.>U<>-v Edgewater Development Company for annexation of 6. 218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "S" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (11) nll~ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Conunittee: FILE ···········-····· lETIER ············- A/C •••• TKLR •••• ............................. (I) Staff report on Joint Works Budgets (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Fiscal Policy Committee recommending adoption of Joint Works Budgets and personnel requirements (3) Rofl Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of motion approving 1978-79 personnel requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 78-106, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Joint Operating Budget FILE---········-··-~ LETIER ··--~ Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the A/C .... TKLR -1978-79 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint ~ Works Construction) ---(i3) (oALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify '\..,) .................. · l~ claims and forward to Orange County auditor for immediate payment for .d\~~ expenditures incurred after June 30, 1978, and declaring that such LETIER ••·••••·•••• certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 A/c .... TKLR •••• pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1978-79 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts FILE ................. . (14) LETTER •••••••••••••• A/C •.•• TKLR •••• (15) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. ~~~44- ALL DISTRICTS See page ----"T" lllQ Consideration of action on items re implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage: (Approved 5/10/78 by Boards) FILE ·-····-···--···· LETTER ·--·-- A/C _TKLR .... (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General N\ \SCounsel re administration of self-insurance plans. See page "U" Ron ean vote or east (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-107, adopting settlement unanimous Ballot rt\.\~ procedures for liability claims. See page "V" ~--.JL_ ~ (c} Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of ~~ Carl Warren & Company for liability claims administration services, ~J~-f /b .. K.:£ ... -N\ \~an~ d autho7izin~ t~e General M:n~ger h to G execu~e Can ag~eem~nt or e..a.~•-V sai services in orm approve y t e enera ounse • ee page "W" (~tern 15 continued on page 8) -7- ;; . ' (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Item 15 continued from page 7) FlLI! ············&·· (d) ~ ...... //~ NC .... TKLR .... Q..,) -·-···-·····-/'{\, \, s Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an umbrella liability policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5 ,000,000 for claims in excess of $300,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $33,750 FILE .................. / ~ .. ~lroll Call Vote or ~~s~ NC .... TKLR .••• unanimous BaJJo.t Conside ration of Resolution No. 78-108, establishingprogram of legal self-insurance re workers' compensation and authorizing a trust account to accommodate administr~tion of workers' compensation claims. See page "X" '--········· (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts ' insurance broker to place an e xcess workers' compensation policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $100,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $20,000 Fil£ -·-·-"""'. ---··---··-1 g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-109, amending Positions and Salaries Resolut i on No. 77-166, as amended, establishing the position of Principa l .Admin i strative Assistant -Safety, lffiER ......... 'R.cill Call Vote or Cast A/C .... TKLR .•. unanimous Ballot Range 1058A ($1687/2099) ---4:ffiD ... ~) ~ Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for workers' comp ensation claims administration A/c .... TKLR ···• services, in form approved by the General Counsel, subject to ~~' approval of sel e ction of s·aid firm by the Fiscal Policy Committee lffiER ···--- (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Conside ration of motion to receive and file staff r e port re status N\\'$ of sludge disposition problem. See page "Y" (b) Consideration of motion authori z ing the Ge neral Manager to negoti a te and award purchase of a Re conditioned Pettibone, Model SM790, Sp e ed Mixer, Sp ecification No . A-092, for sludge composting, in an a mount not to exceed $51,000 plus tax and freight ALL DISTRICTS Other busine ss and communications or supplemental agenda it~ms Conside ration of Resolution No. 78-110, rejecting all bids for Wa r e hou se Of fice Expa n s i on, Job No . J-13-2 , and authori z ing t he Gene ral Ma n ager to establish a bid date for r e bid of said proj e ct. "I" and "II" supplement a l agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn <6 '. ~ (q commun1 or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn g :.:; w -8- ·v (22) supplemental agenda items, if any ~tE) ••• ----·~~ (23) DISTRICT 5 9-Consideration of motion to adjourn q '.du ~DISTRiCT6 ~~) ~Other business and commWlications or supplemental agenda items ~-eatt--YoWor Cft ;r .Unanimous Ballot (24-a) Con s i derati on of Re solution No . 78 -120-6, a uthoriz i ng executi on of ITEMS ON l't\..\~~errt-'t o the City of Cos t a Mesa for construction of tUPPLEMrnTAl AG~ND~ bQ~e p ag e "III" (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjoum <l ·-~ 'l FILE ~ V (26) DISTRICT . 7 ~·~ Other business and commWlications or supplemental agenda items A/C .••. TKLR .... (26-a) Roll Call Vo te or Ca st ---············· Unan imous Ballot ITEMS ON M_ l..$ SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA FILE ·····z:·~r-~ (26 _b) ~Call Vote or Cast A/C ...• TKLR _ JJnanimous Ballo t ~t) ~· _v f\\\S U . ntMS ON A ...,...~l:ff'PLEMENTAI. AGEND Con sidera t ion of Standard Res olution No . 78-121 -7, orde r i n g anne xa t i on of 40 .82 0 acre s of t e rritory to the Di s tri ct in the vici nity south- westerl y of the terminus of Catalin a Street i n the City of Orange, proposed Ann exat ion No. 70 -Tract No. 9670 t o County San itation Dis t rict No. 7. Board authorized ini tiation of p r o ceedings February 8, 197 8. Con s i deration of Standard Reso lution No . 78-1 22 -7, ordering an nexation of 2.18 acres of ter r i tory to t he Distr i ct in t h e vicinity of t he southe rly corner of Eas t Lemon He i ghts Dr i ve a nd Lower Lak e Dr ive , proposed Annexation No. 74 -Nelson Annexation t o County Sanit ation Di s trict No . 7 (to a l so be annexed t o t he 70th Sewer Mai nt en ance Distri ct) Board authorized ini t i ati on of proce edin gs March 8 , 1978 . DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn q · ~ ~ ~ (28) DISTRICT 2 ~--:;.:~·/~V Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items ~~'lf \.,I' (28-a ) Cons i de r ation of Reso lution No . 78 -115 -2 , to r e ceive and f ile bid A/C ··:·~oll Call Vote or Ca st t a bulation and recommen dati on a nd a wa r din g cont ract to Chris t eve . f2-0 .Unan imous Ball oi Corpo rat ion for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Con tract No. 2-19 , in the ---··--M S amount of $5 14 ,204.00; and for Or chard (Ke llogg) Sub -Trun k , ITE MS ON A Contract: No. 2-20, i n t he am ount of $235,006.00_,J See page s "I V" '1-7Q.J., SUPPLEMENTAL AGENO and "V" _9..u..o..~~klo~·~ ·~"bf•~i~~CL~~~ i r .J{'pl D.Q.o . FI LE ·····-tt...~c... V ~~~~ (28-b) P--Jloll Call Vote or Cast A/C .... TKLR -lJnan im ou s Ballot.. Consideration of Standard Res olution No . 78-11 9-2, orde r i n g annexat ion o f 14 2 .144 acres of terri tory t o t h e District i n the vic init y northeast of the Ci t y of Yorba Linda in the Ch ino Hi l ls area, proposed ·····:····:····-··--ITtMS oN' Me ···············-···-SUPPLEMENTAL AGEN Ann e xation No. 21 -Upper K Ran ch An nexation t o County Sanitation Di s trict No. 2 . Bo ard a ut horized i ni tia tion of proceedings May 11, 1977. (29J DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7 :30 p .m., JWle 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hal 1 ~ ·~'{' ~ DIS TR ICT 11 • Verbal staff r epo rt re Coastal Commission permit application for Coast Highw ay Trunk ~e~;:,c!!) 1 and 2 (Coastal Commission h earing -Monday, June 12, 1978 ~ J f.....r? ~), . (31) DISTRICT 11 Other bu s iness and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Considera tion of motion to adjourn<;;-;,..., -9- . ~ .. ~PO ARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 10844 Elli$ Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: l of Oranse.CQunty, Colifornia JOINT BOARDS Area Coda 71-4 5~0-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE JUNE 14, 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. . (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Cnairmen pro tem, if nece~sary ( 4) Recognition of special guests , (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any See supplemental agenda · .(6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 -May 10, District 2 -May 10, . District 3 -May 10, District S May 10, District 6 May 10, District 7 May 10, District 11 -May IO, (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel 1978, regular 1.978, regular 1978, regular 1978, regular 1978, regular 1978, regular 1978, regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Co~sideration of roll call vote motion ra~ifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each . -"! -f''j - -~:r--.:.... District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire· to vote -~ differently for any District) (9) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) · "A" ' "C" and "E" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND -See page(s) "A" ' "C" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" ' "D" and "F" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" ' "D" and "F" DISTRICT NO. 5 NONE DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 .... See page (s) ·~B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11· NONE ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(AA) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion· or furt11er explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be remove~ from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on-the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All i.tems removed from the consen~ calendar shall be considered in the regular orde1 of business. . . Members of the publi.c who wish to remove an item from the con~ent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if. any i terns are to be delet"ed from. the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve a~l· agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically rcmov.~d from same •. -2- ' r ;.._ -.· ·~ (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (b) Consideration of motion ratifying attendance of Joint Chairman and General Manager at a meeting of ocean dischargers in Seattle, Washington, on June 8, 1978, in connection with regulations re waiver of secondary treatment requirements; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by American Standard Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $8,600.48 against C. H. Leavell & Co., contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75· MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $1,591.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Van Diest Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,100.00 against Skipper & Company, contract for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the disposition of the following surplus District vehicles in the most cost-effective manner: One 1962 Dodge One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle.#23) One 1965. International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #52) One 1965 International One-Ton Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #53) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #61) One 1966 Ford One-Half Ton Pickup (Vehicle #62) One 1968 International 24,000 GVW Cab & Chassis (Vehicle #73) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-104, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. I, Job No. PW-062, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: . . July 11, 1978) See page "G" · (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-105, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, to Production Steel Co., Inc. in the amount of $16, 135. 00. See pages "H" · and "!" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to·receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; waive the irregularity in connection with submission of a bid bond; and award Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2, Specification No. E-093, to James P. Kinney Company in the amount of $5,950.55. See page "J" (j) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, clarifying the requirements for the sprinkler modification as required by the Building Code and changing the bid date from June 1 to June 13, 1978. (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the pians and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, granting a time extension of 81 calendar days to the contract with H. C. Smith Construction Company due to inclement weather. See page "K" DISTRICT 2 (1) (m) (n) _(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-111-2 , approving agreement with Lowry & Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, for a lump sum fee of $8,400.00, in accordance with the procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services. See page "L" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, authorizing an addition of $3,380.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. to replace asphalt bike trail and granting a time extension of 6 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "M" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, authorizing an addition of $2,300.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for filling of temporary sewer with a mud jacking material and granting a time extension of 9 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "N" Consideration of Resolution No. 78-112-2 , accepting Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "0" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page S) -4- :.;;: ____ :;;.. (9). (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (p) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, allowing the use of reinforced concrete pipe as an alternate to the vitrified clay pipe, and incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing their right-of-way (q) Consideration of motion approving Addendurn·No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, incorporating insurance requirements of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for crossing of their right-of-way (r) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-113-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .755 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, proposed Annexation No. 32 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file request ffom Bernard Guy for annexation of approximately .5 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim; and Standard Resolution No. 78-114-2 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 33 -Guy Annexation to.County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "P" (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Warmington Development, Inc. and The Baldwin Company for annexation of 165.676 acres of territory located approximately one-half mile northeast of the future intersection of Yorba Linda Drive and Village Center Drive in the City of Yorba Linda, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 34 -Tract No. 10011 to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "Q" (u) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and award a contract in an amount not to exceed $12,600.00 for application of zebron coating to manholes on Cypress Avenue Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-9, to repair damages caused by discharge from Collier Chemical Company (Said cost to be reimbursed by Collier Chemical Company) DISTRICT 3 (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-116-3, approving plans and specifications for Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: July 27, 1978) See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from· page 5) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) .;,-.... _ (w) Consideration of motion authorizing General Manager to negotiate-and\..,) award a contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for repair of manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer~ Contract No. 3-lR-4, in an amount not to exceed $45,000 DISTRICT 5 (x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statement for the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period from March 28, 1975, through June 30, 1977. DISTRICT 7 (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-117-7 , ordering annexation of 12.531 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Plantero Road and Racquet Hill Street in the Lemon Heights area, proposed Annexation No. 71 -Tract No. 9615 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 7.8-118-7, ordering annexation of 1.156 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Vereda, proposed Annexation No. 72 -Stansell Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (aa) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Edgewater Development Company for annexation of 6.218 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Randall Street and Kennymead Street in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 81 -Tract No. 9407 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "S" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Conunittee's written ·report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1) Staff report on Joint Works Budgets (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of Fiscal Policy Committee recommending adoption of Joint Works Budgets and personnel requirements (3) Consideration of motion approving 1978-79 personnel requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 78-106, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 (4) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Joint Operating Budget (5) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1978-79 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify c.laims and forward to Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1978, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1978-79 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts (14) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "T" (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items re implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage: (Approved 5/10/78 by Boards) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report of General Counsel re administration of self-insurance plans. See page "U" (b) ·consideration of Resolution No. 78-107, adopting settlement procedures for liability claims. See page "V" (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Carl Warren & Company for liability claims administration services, and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement for said services in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "W" (Item 15 continued on page 8) -7- (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Item 15 continued from page 7) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an umbrella liability policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $300,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $33,750 "*" ...... (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-108, establishing program of legal self-insurance re workers' compensation and authorizing a trust account to accommodate administration of workers' compensation claims. See page "X" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to direct the Districts' insurance broker to place an excess workers' compensation policy for 1978-79 for a coverage limit of $5,000,000 for claims in excess of $100,000 primary self-insurance retention, for a total premium not to exceed $20,000 (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-109, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, establishing the position of Principal Administrative Assistant -Safety, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for workers' c·ompensation claims administration services, in form approved by the General Counsel, subject to approval of selection of said firm by the Fiscal Policy Conunittee (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report re status of sludge disposition problem. See page "Y" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase of a Reconditioned Pettibone, Model SM790, Speed Mixer, Specification No. A-092, for sludge composting, in an amount not to exceed $51,000 plus tax and freight (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-110, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, to ~~_,...~~..,.._.--~~--~~-in the amount of $ (Bid opening 6/13/78 -See Supplemental Agenda) (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any \:_./ (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) . DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-115-2, to receive and file bid tabulations and recommendations and awarding contract(s) for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, to ---~~~~..---.-,..~~ in the amount of $ ; and Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, to in the amount of $ (Bid opening 6/13/78 -See Supplemental Agenda) (29} DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall (30) DISTRICT 11 Verbal staff report re Coastal Commission permit application for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Reaches 1 and 2 (Coastal Commission hearing -Monday, June 12, 1978) (31) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- II r-· BO A RDS OF DI RECTORS II · Coun ty Sanitation Di str icts of Orange County, California JOI NT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JUNE 14) 1978 -7:30 P.M. DISTRIC T 3 Post Office Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Tele ph ones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (5) Consideration of mot i on to receive and file minute excerpt from the following city re garding election of mayor and appointment of alternate, and seating new membe rs of the Board: (""Mayor) City Seal Beach ALL DISTRICTS District 3 Active Frank J. Laszlo* Alternate Hera ld Ke nt Seitz (17-a) Conside ration of Reso lution No . 78 -110, r e jecting a ll bids for Warehous e Office Exp a nsion , Job No. J-13-2, a nd a u thorizing the Ge nera l Ma n ager to es tablish a bid date for r ebi d of said proj e ct. See p a ges "I" and "II" DIST RI CT 6 (24-a) Consideration of Reso lution No. 78 -1 20-6, authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to t h e City of Costa Mesa for construction of s torm drain b y City. See page !•II I" DIST RICT 7 (26 -a) Consideration of St an dard Reso lution No. 78-121-7, ordering annexation of 40.820 acre s of territory to the District in th e vicin ity south- west erly of the t erminus o f Catalina Street in the City of Orange, proposed Annex at ion No . 70 -Tract No . 9670 to County Sanitatjon Di s trict No. 7. Board authorized ini ti ation of proc eedings Fe brua ry 8, 197 8 . (26-b) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78 -122-7, ordering annexation of 2 .1 8 acres of t erritory to the District in the vicinity of t h e southe rly corn er of Eas t Lemon He ight s Drive an d Lower Lake Drive, propose d An n exation No . 74 -Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation Dist:rict No . 7 (to a l s o be ann exed to t h e 70th Sewer Mainte nance Di strict) Board a utho rized i n itiation of proceeding s Marc h 8, 1978. DISTRICT 2 (28-a) Con sideration of Resolution No . 78-115-2, to receive a nd file bid tabulation and rcccnunendation and awarding contract to Christeve Corpora tion for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19 , in the amount of $514,204.00; and for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub -Trunk , Contract No. 2-20, in the amoun t of $235 ,006.00. See pages "IV" and "V" (28 -b) Conside rat ion of Standard Reso luti on No. 78-119-2, ordering an n exation of 142.144 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast of the City of Yorba Linda in the Chino Hills a r ea , proposed Annexation No. 21 -Upper K Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. Board author iz ed initiation of proceedings May 11, 1977. -2- r ... RESOLUTION NO. 78-110 ....... REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2 A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,' 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on June 13, 1978, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and, · WHEREAS, the bids received have been evaluated by the Districts' engineers, and the apparent low bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately forty- seven (47) percent; and, WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written recommendation that said bids be rejected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. Tiiat all bids received for said work be hereby rejected; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish. a bid date for rebid.of said project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. II I II AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "111 . B I D T A n U L A T I 0 N SH E·E T • • JOB NO •. J-13..:2 . PROJECT TITLE WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION • t;.' --• 11 June 13, 1978 11:00 A.M • . P~OJECT DESCRIPTION Supplying all labor, equipment, materials and forces necessary for the ~omplete work. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 125,000 __ ;;.,___ ____ _ BUDGET. AMOUNT $ -------- REMARKS ~~-------~-~---~--~~~---~~--~-- 1. 2. .3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9·. 10. "II" CONTRACTOR Dacon Construction Corp. Santa Ana, Ca. Magnus Co. Fullerton, CA Bayside Builders & .Engr. Santa Ana, CA T & H Construction Downey; CA ~· • AGENDA ITEM #17(A) -ALL DISTRICTS TOTAL BID 183,998.00 197,85~.oo 214,247.00 _236,586.00 V. ""-'. RESOLUTION NO. 78-120-6 AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAIN A RESOLUTION OF 1HE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AU1HORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO nm CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR CONSTRUC- TION OF CITY STORM DRAIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated , ~~~~~~~~- wherein an easement in the vicinity between Harbor Boulevard and the Santa Ana River, north of the San Diego Freeway, in the City of Costa Mesa, for construction of a storm drain, is hereby granted to the City of Costa Mesa; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a partof this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted for no fee; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "III" AGENDA ITEM #24(A) -DISTRICT 6 "III" RESOLUTION NO. 78-115-2 AWARDING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20 A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROJECTS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, AND ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the projects for construction of RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, and ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, are hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file Notices of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation "this day submitted to the Board V of Directors by Lowry and Associates, District's engineer, and concurred in by the ·District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to·CHRISTEVE CORPORATION for RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, and ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for the Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contrac-t No. 2-19, be awarded to Christeve Corporation in the total amount of $514,204.00; and the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, be awarded to Christeve Corporation in the total amount of $235,006.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor "IV-1" AGENDA ITEM #28(A) -DISTRICT 2 "IV-1" • for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section S. That all other bids ·for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "IV-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(A) -DISTRICT 2 "IV-2" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T :: ~ CONTRACT No.· · 2-19 & · 2-20 PROJECT TITLE RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK·,· CONTRACT· NO·.· 2-19 · & ·ORCHARD (KELLOGG) ·SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sewer line construction on· Richfield· &·Kellogg·from·Orangethorpe to·La·Palma $450,000.00 (2-19) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 204 ,000. 00 (2-20) BUDGET AMOUNT $. DATE.. June 13, 1978 -11 A.M. 1. CONTRACTOR Christeve Corp. Arcadia, CA Bebek Co. Irvine, CA Sully-Miller Contracting Co. Long Beach, CA 90805 N.A. Artukovich San Diego, CA TOTAL 2-19 TOTAL 2-20 TOTAL 2-19 & 2-20 514,204.00 ?35,006.00 749,210.00 530,831.00 222,569.00 753,400.00 644,288.00 326,474.00· 970,762.00 641,645.00 322,725.00" 964,370.00 DEDUCT TOTAL BID 15,000.00 734,210.00 10,000.00 743.400.00 15,000.00 955,, 762. 00 -o-964,370.00 ... ~ -I :::c 5. John A. Artukovich Azusa, CA .......... n --f :: < :: 6. 7. 8. 9. Steve P. Rados Santa Ana, CA Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. Upland, CA ( 618,001.00 359,037.00 977,038.QO 10,000.00 967,038.00 738,865.00 2781900.00 1,017,765.00 20,000.00 ·997, 765. 00 775,015.00 333,940.00 1,108,955.00 10,000.00 1,098,955.00 .ti .. ,· _.. ( ( ..., MA NA GER'S AGEN DA RE POR T 4 Coun.ty Sanitation Di st ricts of O range County, California JOINT BOA RD S Regul ar Meet i ng June 1 4, 1 978 -7:30 p.m. Pos t Office Box 8 127 108 4 4 Ell is Aven u e Fountain Va lley, Calif., 9 2 708 T elcphones: A re a Code 71 4 5 40-291 0 9 62-2411 The fo llowing is a brief explanation of the more important , n on -rou t in e items which appear on the enc l osed agenda and which are n ot otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Join t Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplicat i on in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Mana g er 's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in t he ag e nda itself, particularly with regard to chang e orders , and con - t racts which have been publicly bid and are withi n the contract budget o r engineer's e stim ate . Detailed change orders are included in the s u pporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being r ecomm ended for award . .._., Th e Jarv is/Ga nn Amentlment Pursuant to the ins tructions of the Executive Co mmit tee, the staff is reviewing t h e CORF budg et for the purpose of deleting those projec ts which can be def erred, in lig ht of passage of th e Jarvis/Gann Amendm e nt. A ful l discussion of the effects of Proposition 13 will be h e l d next Wednesday when the Joint Works Op erating and Construc t ion budgets are considered. The individual District budgets wil l be considered by the Boards at the August Joint meeting . J oint Boards No. 9 -a -General Authorization for Att en dance of Per s onne l at Meet i n gs . For the past several years, the General Manager has been autho- r i zed on an annual b as is to de s i gnate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meet ings , conferenc e s , etc., within the State, which he be lieves wi ll be of value to the Di stricts . It is recommended that th is authorization be ren ewe d. No. 9-b -Ra tifying Attendance re EPA Hearing -Ocean Wa iver Regul a tion s , S eattle, Washington . Th e Joint Ch a i rman a nd Genera l Manager represented the Districts at t~e West Coa~t h earing June 8th in Seattle, Wa shing ton, to g i ve testin~n y rel a tive to EPA 1 s proposed regulations for waiver of Fed e ral secondary treatment requirements for deep ocean dischargers. The action appearing on the agenda authorizes reimbursement of expenses incurred . No. 9-f -Surplus Vehicles . During the 1978-79 fiscal year, the Districts will be replacing six vehicles (10-14 years old). The staff is requesting authority to di spose of these trucks in the most cost -effective manner . We expect to include these vehicles in city equipment auctions as the new re- placements are delivered . No. 9-g -Plans and Specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. I -Job No. PW -062 . The staff has prepared the plans and specifications for repair, resurfacing and sand slurry coating for the asphalt surfaces at Re- clamation Pl a nt No. 1. Included in this project is the construction of the public sidewalk area easterly of the main entrance thpt is re- qu ired by the City of Fountain Valley . This is a reg ularly bud g eted item. The engineer's estimate for the project is $100,000. The staff recommends approva l of the plans and specifications, with bids to be received July 11th. No. 9 -h -Award of Job PW-066 -Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Re clamatio n Plant No. 1. At the May meeting, the Board approved the plans and specifications prepared by the staff for the modification of the sludge hopper outlet ports at Plant No. 1. This is a $20,000 budgeted item, for which the engineer's estimate of construction was $20,000. Bids were received and opened on June 1st. Two bids. were received , rang ing fro m a high of $16,854 to the low of $16,135. The staff recomm ends that award be made to Production Steel Company, Inc., in the amount of $16,135. · No. 9-i -Award of Specification No. E -093 -Acquisition of Two- Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant No. 2. Bids were received and opened on May 30th for this budgeted equip - ment item which is a part of the ·pre -chlorination facilities at Plant No. 2. Three bids were received, which ranged from a low of $5,950.55 to a high of $8,194.86. The staff recommends award that award be made to J. P. Kinney Company of Los Angeles, in the amount of $5 ,950.55. The staff's estimate for purchase of this equipment was $6,000. No. 9-j -Addendum No. 1 to Job No . J-13-2 -Warehouse Expansion . Thi s Addendum clarifies the requirements for the sprinkler modifi - cation as required by the Building Code and revises the bid date from Jun e 1 to June 13, 1978 . The staff recommends the approval of this Add endum. -2- -. No. 9-k -Change Order No. 2 to Job No . PZ-23-6. This chang e order for the $30 million Major Facilities under construction at Plant No. 2 is to extend the contract comp l etion date by 81 calendar days as a result of inclement weathe r during January, February and Mar c h. The 81 calendar days reflect the days of rain or lo ss of time as a result of the rain during the past winter . The staff reconunends app r ova l of this change order at no additional cost to the Districts. District No. 2. No. 9-1 -Approving Engineering Services for Olive Subtrunk, Contrac t No. 2 -6R (River Damage Repairs). Pursuant to the Board's autho riz ation and in accordance with the pro cedures for the selection of engineering services, negotiations were held with representatives of Lowry & Associates to p r ovi de the necessary engineering for plans and s pecification s for the Rehabilitation of the Olive Subtrunk which was destroyed during the winter run -off flows in the Santa Ana River l ast February. The replacemen~ of this sewer, wh ich will be partially financed by the Federal Disast er Relief Fund, is scheduled to be constructed before October 15th (beginning of the rainy season). The negotiated fee for the basic services was agr eed at $8,400 (65% of ASCE fee curve for a similar project), including preliminary engineering, surveys for design and preparation of plans and detailed specifications. The acceptance of the proposal from Lowry & Associates, which i s included with the agenda, is recomm ended wi th a contract to be wr itten and execut ed for this project . No. 9-m,n,& o -Acce~tance of Contract No . 2 -SR -Orange Subtrunk, Santa Ana River CrossingRi ver Dama g e Repair). This contract for the r estora tion of the damaged Orange Subtrunk Crossing of the Santa Ana River has been completed. Two change orders for misce llaneous items modify the final contract amount by an add itiona l $5,680 and extends the contract 15 calendar days. Change Order No. 1 -This change order i s for the rest orat i on of the asphalt ic concrete surface on the bike trai ls adjacent to the working area. These bike trails were damaged during the emergency construction and h ad to be restore d to their original condition. This change order is for a n additiona l $3 ,380 and extends the contract time by 6 ca l endar days. Ch an~e Order No. 2 -Thi s change order adds $2,300 to t e contract amo u nt fo r filling t he corrugated metal temporary sewer with a mud jacking material to act as a protec tive barrier from further erosion imm ediate ly downst ream of the permanent installation. -3 - This change order also extends the original contract time by an additiona l 9 calendar days because of re- strictions imposed on the Districts by the Corps of Engineers in discharging flood wate rs from Prado Dam. The staff recommends approv a l of Ch ang e Orders Nos. 1 and 2 and the execution o f a final closeout agreemen t wi th John Artukovich & Sons, Inc., contractors for this proj ect. The f inal contract amount is $28 1,7 80 . Th e staff a l so recommends the f il ing of a N0tice of Comp l etion for this project in accordance with Distri cts ' po licy. Th e sewer replacement is partially fund ed by the Fede r al Disaster Reli e f Fund. No . 9-p -~proving Addendum No-. 1 to Con tract No. 2 -1 9. . This Addendum allows the use of e ither vitrified clay pipe or rein force d concret e pipe fo r the 42 -inch sewer p i pe size spec ifi ed. The inclusion of the alterna te material wi ll h e lp in attract in g more competi tion in the bidding· for this work. Th e staff recommends approval of this Add endum . No. 9 -q -Approving Addendum No. 1 to Contract No. 2-20 and Add endum No. 2 to Contract No . 2 -19. These addenda i ncorporate the requirements of the Atchison, Top eka and Santa Fe Ra ilway Comp a ny for the crossing of each sewer southerly of La Pa l ma Avenue. The in surance requireme n ts and other license conditions were not received until after the plans and speci - fic ations were released to prospective bidders. The staff recommends approval of these addenda. No. 9-r -Initi ation of Annexation No . 32 -Anaheim Hills Annexa - tion No. 8 (0.7 acres . An ah eim Hills, Inc ., has r equ ested ann e xa tion of 0. 75 acres .of pro perty in the City of Anaheim . Thi s area has been zoned for es t ate size d lots, 22,000 square f ee t, a nd the annexation is requested to be incorporated in a d eve lopmen t of a r eas pr eviously annexed to the District . The staff recommends initiation of proceedings for this prop osed annexation. No. 9-s -Init iation of Annexation No. 33 -Guy Annexat i on (0 .5 Acr es). We are in receipt of a request to annex a 1/2 a cre single r esi - den tia l parcel located on Mohler Drive in the City o f Anaheim . The staff i s requesting initiation of annexation proceedings since this particular p a rcel has been of some concern to t he City of Anahe im staff as wel l as th e County Health Department. The existing r esidence ce sspool system h as failed , causing a health hazard on t he parcel and on adjacent properties. Thi s residential parcel con f orms to the Di strict's Master Plan for l a nd use and al l necessary fees have b een paid. -4- - No. 9-u -Contract Negotiation for Coating Damaged Manholes. Twenty-one manholes on the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, have been damaged by discharges from the Collier Chemical Company. The company has deposited $12,600 with the District, based on staff estimate of damages. The staff reconnnends repairing the manholes by applying a Zebron coating, wh i ch is a high -density polyurethane and impervious to most chemicals. Thi s material is a proprietary product, therefore the staff is r equesting authority to negot i a te a contract for the repair of the manholes in a n amount not to exceed $12,600. District No. 3 No . 9-v -Plans and Specifications for Contract No. 3-13 -1 - Westside Force Main. Plans and specifications have been completed by the District's consulting engineer (Boyle Engineering Corporation) for the second unit of the Westside Force Main which extends easter l y from 'the Sea l Beach Pump ing Station at Seal Beach Boulevard, along Westminster Boulevard to Rancho Street in the City of Westminster. At the present time, only one force main serves the westerly portion of the Di strict , including the Cities of Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, Cypre ss , La Palma, Cerritos, and portions of Stanton and Buena Park . This second unit would provide reliability necessary to insure continuous operation, as wel l as to provide capacities for future f l ows in the drainage area. The engineer 's estimate for this project is $1 .6 million. Bids are tentatively planned to be received on July 27th. The staff recommends approval of plans and specifications for this pro ject. No . 9 -w -Authority to Neg~tiate for Contra ct Services -Contract No. 3-lR-4 -Miller Holder Trunk ·sewer . 1\rh en the Miller Holder Trunk Sewer was constructed in the l ate 1950 's, PVC liner plate was installed in the pipe, but the manhole structures received a paint-like coating for corrosion protection . This coating material has deteriorated, requiring the replacement with the PVC l iner plate in al l manhole shafts. Contracts have b een awarded for the repair of manho l e shafts on this major interceptor sewer over the past nine years . In each of the previous contracts, the Distric t has received only one bid because of the specialization of this type of remedial work and has resulted in rejection of the bid with a subsequent ne go tiated price to perform the work with the par- ticular contractor . The staff is, therefore, reconune ndin g that the General Manager be authorized to award a contract in an amount not to exceed $45,000 for the repair of the PVC lining in manholes on the Miller Holder Trunk Sewer . Ne got i ations will be conducte d with F. B. Cook Corporation, who h as performed this repair work for t he Districts on previous contracts. -5- District No. 7 No. 9-y -Order ing Annexation No. 71. At the J a nua ry meetin g, the Board initiated annexation proceedings for Tract No. 9615 which is located in the vicinity of Pl a nt ero Road and Rac quet Hills Street in the Lemon Heights area of the unincorporated p ortion of the County. This tract con tains approximately 12.5 l·c res and is proposed to be deve l oped with 22 s ingle -fami l y dwelling units with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet . This annexat i on has b een approved by LAFC. The staff , therefore, recormnends approval of Resolution No. 78-117-7, ord ering annexation of this tract to the District. The parcel wi ll be s erved by the 7th Sewer Maintenance Di strict. Al l required fees h ave been received. No. 9-z -Ordering Annexation No. 72. In January, the District Di re ctors initiated proceedings for the annexation of approximately 1 .2 acres in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and La Verda in the unincorporated portion of the County. T,his matter was subsequently forwarded to LAFC which has approved the parcel for annexation. This area proposes the development of four sing l e -family homes and will be served by the 7th Sewer Maintenanc e District. The staff , therefore, recomm e nds approva l of Resolution No. 78-118-7, ordering annexation of this parce l to thE! District. All n ecessary fees h ave been paid by the proponent. All Districts Nos. 11 and 12 -~eport of the Executive Conunittee. The Co nunittee met on May 24th with the Fiscal Policy Committee and e nclos ed for Board members is. a writt e n report of their discu ss ions and r ecommended actions for consideration by the Boards . No. 1 3 -Payment of Claims after June 30, 1978. The Districts ' budgets are adopted at the August Joint Board meeting each year, a nd therefore it i s necessary to have Board autho- rization for the payme nt of claims fr om July 1 to the date of adoption of next year's budge t . It is recommend e d that the action appear ing on th e agenda be approved. No. 14 -Nominations for Joint Ch airman and Vice Joint Chairman. As provided in the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure, nominat ions for these two offices are made a t the r egular Jun e meeting, with elections to take place at the July ree ular Joint Board meeting. For the n ew Direc tor s ' information, we have included in t h e s upporting docum e nts section of the agenda material, an excerpt from the Rules of Procedure for Meetings r e lative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Ch airman of the Joint Administrative Or gani zat ion. -6 - No. 15 -Impl eme nt a tion of Self-In surance for Workers' Com- pens ation a nd Primary Li ability Coverage. Pursuan t to th e Boards' a uthoriz a tion la s t month, the General Counsel a nd staff are recommending the eight actions appearing unde r this item on the a g enda . A report from the General Counsel is in- clud ed in the agend a supporting documents; see page "V". No. 16 -Statu s of Slu d ge Disposal Problems and Request for Purchase of Equipme nt. Th e staff has included a status r e port on our sludRe d i sposa l probl ems in the agenda s u pporting material; see pag e "Y . Since al l alternatives involve th e acquisition of severa l piec e s of e quipm e nt for compos ting the digest e d sludg e ma terial for r ecycling or landfill, the st a ff r e quests authori z ation to n e gotiate for the purchase of a n ava ila ble reconditioned spee d mixer machine for sludg e c omp o sting in an amount not to exceed $51,000 , plus taxes and freight. (1 978-7 9 Joint Works bud g et, solids di s posa l and transporta t i on facil ities, $500,000). ' No. 17 -Award of Contra ct for War e house Office Expansion. Con struction bids wi ll b e received Tuesday, June 13th for the War e house Office Expansion; $150,000 wa s budge ted this year fo r the proj e ct. Bec a u s e ma n y c o ntrac tors are busy , the bidding may not be as competitive as we would lik e . In the event the bids come in sub stant i a lly over our estima te , the sta ff will recommend deferment of this project until the bidding clima te is better. Dis trict No. 2 No. 28 -Award of Contracts 'for Construction o f the Richfield Inter c eytor and the Kellog g (Orchard) Subtrunk (Bid Opening Tuesday, June 13 . These two subtrunks are a part of the District's Master Plan faciliti es which are des i gned to relieve t he Atwood Subtrunk in Oran g e - th orpe Avenue, diverting the flows into the Santa Ana River In ter - c eptor in La Palma Avenue. The Richfield In tercepto r consists of appr oximate l y 3,000 feet of 42 -inch sewer which is estimated to cost $450,000. The Kel l o g g (Orchard) Subtrunk consists of a~proximate l y 2 ,000 feet of 2 7-inch sewe r wh i c h is estimat e d t o cost ~204,000. Bids for both projects (1977-78 Bud g et Richfi e ld Trunk $475 ,0 00; Ke llo gg (Orchard) Trunk $223,000) are being taken concurrent l y to g ive a con- tractor the option of bidd ing on both projects or each pr ojec t separately. -7- No . 29 -Ad·ourn ed Mee tin June 21 s t, Pu b li c Hearin r e Draft Enviro nmen ta l Im p act Statemen t o n Ca rb o n Canyon Faci itie s P a n . The Di s trict No. 2 Board s h ou ld a dj o u r n to 7:3 0 p .m ., Jun e 21 at the Brea City Ha ll f o r t h e p u rpose o f con duc ting a p ubli c h earing rel a tive t o t he Ca r bon Ca n yon F ac ilities P l a n a n d En v i ronmen ta l I mp act S tatement. Th e Boar d set t hi s h ear i ng da t e a nd l oca t ion a t the Apr il 1 2th me et i n g. District No . 11 No . 30 -Coa s ta l Comm is s i o n Perm it Ap pli ca tio n f o r Coas t Highway Tr unk Sewer. The h ear ing b efore t he Co asta l Comm i ss i on o n the Di str icts' a p p lication for the Master Plan Coas t Hi g hway T runk Sewer will b e h e l d Monday , J une 1 2. The Co mmission 's s t aff has r ecommen ded d e nia l on th e b as i s of th e f o llow i ng find ings: 1 . Th e p roposed pro j ect i s an integral and functional ph a se o f the e nt i r e San i tat i on Dis t ric t #11 proj e c t a nd app r oval of the' proposed p roject repr e sents imp l ie d cons e nt t o t he approval of the San i tat i on· Di stric t #1 1 pro j ect . 2. As proposed Sanita tion District #11 projec t wi ll have adverse cumulat i ve e ffects u pon the 'restora tion a nd ma i nte nance of the Bolsa Chica E co l og i ca l Reserve a n d is the r efore not i n conformity with Se c tions 30230 , 3023 1 and 3 0240 of t h e Coastal Act . 3. Th e propose d pro j ect, c o.n s idered as a whole , will redu c e deve l op- me n t costs, increase "land v a lue s , and encour a ge the deve looment of - Bo l sa Chica mars h and bluffs . It h as no t vet beeri d e t e rmin ed wh e ther or n ot t h e developme nt of Bals a Chica marsh and bluffs is consis t ent _wi t h Chapter 3 of-the Coa st a l Act , thus , the proposed proj e ct which in d u ce s ceve l opment i n those areas is inconsistent with Section 30254 o f th e Coasta l Act . 4. Th ere are f e asib l e a l te r native s an d feas i ble mi t i g ation measures as p rovided in CEQA, s uch as d e l aying the project unt il th e LCPs h ave be e n pre p a r e d an d ce r ti~i e d , avail a ble f o r i mpos ition by t h is Commiss i on und e r the p ower g r a n te d to i t ·whi c h wo uld subst a ntially l essen any si g nif i cant adv e r s e iIT.pact that the devel opme n t , as f i n a l l proposed ~ay have o n the environment . 5 . T h e proposed develop me nt i s n ot i n conformi t y wi th the provisions o f Chap t er 3 of the Coasta l Ace and wi l .l substantial l y pre j udice the a b i li ty of the l oc a l g overnment to prep a re a loca l coasta l progfam t h a t i s in con formity wit h sa i d c h a pte r. -8- It appea r s the staff den i a l recommendation i s based on future pla nn ed extensions to the Coast Hig hway Trunk in the Bo lsa Chica area, rather than the project conside r ed in the appl i cation request. Th e Di str i cts ' staff wi ll s u gges t to the Commission that the project under consideration will serve the present and future needs of the area south of Garfield and west of Newland Streets (approxi- mately 1/4 of Huntington Beach). The staff will report verbal l y as to the outcome of Monday 's hearin g . Fred A. Harp er General Mana g er -9- ( RE: AGENDA ITEM #30 -DISTRICT 11 •---sfA1} OF CALIFORNIA ·, CAUFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION 666 E. OCEAN BOUlEVARD. SUITE JI07 p .o. SOX 1 .. so '--'LONG &EACH, CAllfORNIA 90801 • (l13) S90-.S071 (71 ") 8'6.06A8 To: Connnissioners From: Executive Director Subject; Staff Smmnary and Reconnnendations Application No.: P-78-3184 Attachments: 1 ~ Site & Vicinity Map EDMUND G. BROWN JR .• Cc..,•tndt dp May 31,· 1978 2. Master Plan of Sewers for District #11 3. Environmental Impact Report 4. I\ -· 6. 1. Administrative Action: . . The application has been reviewed and is complete. The. 42-day hearing. period expires 6-15-78 Public Hearing is scheduled for 6-12-78 . Continuations, (if any) were granted as follows: w'2. Applicant: Orange Courity Sanitation·District.#11 Applicant's full name 714/540-2910 P.O. Box 8127 Address Fountain Valley, CA Or Dennis M. Reid Representative's name same Address 3. Project Location: (a)' City or District (b) County (c) Street Address (d) Area is Zoned £ 1£ . .,.., ~ Telephone number •. 92708 Telephone number Huntington Beach Orange Along Pacific C~ast Hwy. Public Right-Of-Way & Recreational Use . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,_ -_ij Construction of approximately three miles of 84-inch diameter sewer interceptor along the seaward side of Pacific Coast Highway from Lake Street to Brookhurst Street, thence northeasterly on Brookhurst approximately 0.3 mile to Treatment Plant #2 and a 0.5 mile connectiv~ reach southerly along Newland Street between Hamilton Avenue and V Pacific Coast Highway. . .... -: •. LOCATION DESCRIPTION & STREET ADDRESS: See project description above. The project is located entirely within the City of Huntington Beach. DISTANCE FROM MEAN HIGH TIDE LINE: adjacent to the beach. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: public right-of-way and recreation SITE SIZE: N.A. = sq. ft. DENSITY: Gross: N.A. Net: UNIT MIX: N.A. ON-SITE PARKING: Primarv = N.A .. Size = Tandem = Size = Total = PROJE'CT HEIGHT: Above AFG = N.A. Above CFR = PROJECT COST: $2,200,000 EIR: Final EIR AGENCY APPROVAL: Aoproval in Conceot = City Council, RWQCB, Dept.~ Parks and Recreation, Dept. of Fish and Game, Orange County EMA .. -2- -.-............ _ *'.__..••• ·-•---•·---. ... _,,__.~....,.._. ..... _...,.._..,.___,...-.., •. ~.•---.~.I r -,... r .-, : . I• Issues: 1. Growth Inducement 2. Preservation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas 3. Premature Commitment of Planning Options Growth Inducement: Staff would point out that the project before the· Commission is a three-mile interceptor system (Reaches 1 and 2) of a proposed eight- mile system which forms Orange County Sanitation District #11. When c·ompleted this sewerage system will extend easterly from Warner Ave., around the periphery and through environs of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, down Walnut St. from the intersection with Golden West St. to Lake St. where it interconnects with the proposed Reaches 1 and 2. It is staff's opinion that consideration of the proposed project out of context with the c!umulatiye impact .of the total integrated system as described in the Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report would represent inept and piecemeal planning, Further. construction of the project at this time reduces develo~ment costs, increases land values and .encourages development of Balsa Chica marsh and bluffs . .... . -The following citation has been extracted from the Environmental Impact Report (emphasis added): 1.1 Project Description .- The Master Plan of Sewers for the City of Huntington Beach and County Sani ta ti on District No. 11 proposes_ the construction of several \ . . sewer facilities between 1977 and 1985. The sewer facilities are proposed for construction in both developed and undeveloped areas of Huntington Beach and along the southeastern portion of the unincorporated Bolsa Chica area. They have been designed to accomodate anticipated growth in the City of Huntington Beach, in accordance with the City 1 s existing zoning maps· and plans of the Signal Landmark Company for the Bolsa Chica area. They are also · designed to provide for gravity flow and for solutions to problems of inter- district flows, where possible. The key feature of the proposed M~ster Plan ·of Sewer Facilities is the Coast Trunk Sewer, which extends northward from :Brookhurst Street along Pacific Coast Highway to Lake Street, along Walnut :street from Lake Street to Golden West Street, through unaeveloped land between Gol~en West Street and bluffs south of the Balsa Chica, along the southeastern edge of the Balsa Chica area, and northward across the bluffs to Los Patos Avenue, near Warner Avenue. continued ...•... -~- 1.2 Environmental Impacts land Use Sewer faci 1 i ti es are proposed for constructi.on through resi den ti a 1 , commercial, industrial and open. space areas of the Cjty of Huntington. Beach -'~ -it '·.· and the unincorporated Balsa Chica area. Certain land use activities may be temporarily inconvenienced by the proposed sewer construct~on; e.g., commer- cial land uses along Beach Bo.ulev.ard, Pacific Coa.st.Highw~y between Lake ·street .. and Beach Boulevard, Main Street near W~lnut Avenue, and Warner Avenue west of .~pringdale Street; and recreational use of Central Park. In the long-term, the proposed sewer facilities will indirectly contribute to the conversion of agri- cy]tµre}l -and other open space land to urban development. ~fection 30254 of the 1976 Coastal. Act states, in part the following (emphasis added): "New or expanded public works facilities shall be designed and limited to accommodate needs generated by development or uses permitted consistent with the provisions of this division .... Special districts shall not be formed or expanded except where ~he service would not induce new development inconsis- tent .with this division." It is clearly indicated that the proposed project is not needed at this time. It is likewise clear that it is only needed for the future development of central Huntington Beach and the Balsa Chica area which will, " ... indirectly contribute to the conversion of agriculture and open space land to urban develop- ment." 1 . . In .staff'·s opinion approval of the proposed project would constitute implied consent to do exactly that. Preservation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The total project will, when completed, encroach upon the periphery and surrounding area of the Bolsa Chica State Ecological Reserve. Sections 30230 and 30231 of the 1976 Coastal Act read as follows: 1 . opus cit -4- -·"' ~- ~30230. Mat me resources shall be maintained, enhanced, and, where feasible, restored. Special protection shall be given to areas and species of special biological or economic significance. Uses of the marine environment shall be carried out in a manner that will sustain I the biological productivity of coastal waters and that will maintain! healthy populations of aJl species of marine organisms adequate for I long-term comm_ercial, recreational, scientific, and educational I purposes. · . . 30231.. The biological productivity anl the quality of coastal: waters, streams, wetlands,· estuaries, and lakes appropriate to' maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for thej protection of human health shall be maintained and; where feasible,, restored through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of ~aste water discharges and entrainment, controlling runoff,'. preventing depletion of ground water supplies and substantial interference with surface ~aterflow, encouraging waste wateri reclamation, maintaining natural vegetation buffer areas that~ protect riparian ha~itats, arid minimizing alteration of. natural• streams. · . . ·.. · ·. · · · · I . . ·-··-··-. .. .-·· . . . Development of the ffiiar··p·roje'c£ ... and ifs' urban '"•g·rewt:h·~inducement··· .. aspects will generate several coastal planning issues which directly relate to the preservation of the Ecological Reserve. These issues are best addressed by the following excerpt from Alternative Plans for Bolsa Chica prepared by EDAW, Inc., Planning Consultants, for the Bolsa Chica Study Group of the Orange County Environmental Agency in May 1978 (emphas_is added): • Related Planning Several other planning efforts beyond tlto:.P. already noted, such as the Local Coastal Pro- gram, have been identified which have a direct I influence on, or will be affected by the ul- timate plan of Dolsa Chica, and need to be · part of the criteria for comparing any future alternatives. They include: ' 0 The possible widening of Pacific Coast Highway •. I I ! ---------------------------------------------.! o The proposed Coastal Trunkline (sewer) i and upcoming master plan of sewers \ __ f_o_r_t_h_e __ c_i_t_y_o_f __ 11_u_n_t_i_n_g_t_o_n __ n_e_a_c_l_1 ·---~ \ o An automobile beach access point be- tween Warner and Goldem1est. o The reconstruction of the Warner Avenue Bridge.· i o The resolution of the road network north of the Gap. o A study of vacant school sites by the Oceanview School District. o The Seacliff IV residential develop- ment on Huntington Beach Mesa. o The proposed expansion of the East Garden Grove -Wintersburg Channel. -'l- ! I ' . . . " . . . 'i I I ! • i ; : i ! I ' l . ! •. · .. . It Premature Commitment of Planning Options: · . .. The City of Huntington Beach and Orange County are currently in various phases of the preparation of their local coastal programs.~ The project would encourage development of the Bolsa Chica marsh and bluff area before the LCP has determined the nature of develop- ment, if any, which is consistent with the habitat values of the - area. This would seriously foreclose planning options for the LCP, and would tend to endorse the residential proposals put forth by the Signal Landmark Company. Further, aside from the cumulative effect of aforementioned factors, it is the opinion of staff that sewer District #11, or any part thereof, should not be approved until the local coastal programs have determined· that uses requir- ing sewer service are consistent with the 1976 Coastal Act . Findings: 1. The proposed project is an integral and functional phase of the entire Sanitation District #11 project and approval of the proposed project represents implied consent to the approval of the Sanitation District #11 project. 2. ·As proposed Sanitation District #11 project will have adverse cumulative effects upon the ·restoration and maintenance of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve and is therefore not in conformity with Sections 30230, 30231 and 30240 of the Coastal Act .. 3. The proposed project, considered as a whole, will reduce develo~ ment costs, increase ··1and values, and encourage the develonment of - Bolsa Chica marsh and bluffs. It has not vet been determined whether or not the development of Bolsa Chica marsh and bluffs is consistent _with Chapter 3 of-the Coastal Act, thus, the proposed project which induces development in those areas is inconsistent with Section 30254 of the Coastal Act. 4. There are feasible alternatives and feasible mitigation measures as provided in CEQA, such as delaying the project until the LCPs have_ been prepared and certified, available for imposition by this Commission under the power granted to it which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the development, as fin.ally proposed may have on the environmen~. 5. The proposed development is not in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and will substantially prejudice the ability of the local government to prepare a local coastal program that is in conformity with said chapter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial Staff Planner Pickens¢ me -6- ;j : f · 1 ~ J f : l i .. . . I . ~ ; f ; I ' 'f fl '' . r r ... -.. ..... I I I I I I I I --------+-------· I ~: ~c I ./"" . ..······-...:: \"lltb~-'""?"..-- J •"tilf U,,_I CM t ~l'J•TO-l.N ' 1i11•••000 ... ~n~ ~ •a!(_.l Dot :;JS••tC• ~· •I •t•l•\••tLG L• .. ,.-. ... , . .,.. .... , .. uu•••tLO \II •lit 1\. • •O•"J ;11 • ":'1tl~''·••COt' , ... I' ::at•"r\O ~ I i ; ~/; - -----·---+-------0·-. .. ... ---------t-- . i I ~ . 0 ! -----------------------~------~·---- ' ~~ : 4-<1,>- I ..J.. __ ---·--·-__ ....:.. .. -----: p.o\e4 . ::--... ~· May 17, i978 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Executive Committee SUBJECT: 1978-79 Budget Transmittal for: JOINT OPERATING FUND (Including Personnel Recommendations) and CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND 00UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 54().2910 (714) 962-2411 , This year the Directors' Fiscal Policy Committee was established to assist and advise the staff in matters relative to the budgetary policies and procedures of the Boards and to review and counsel staff during formulation. of the annual budgets. The Committee also studies other fiscal matters as directed·and submits appropriate recommendations to the Executive Committee for consideration. Since its appointment last July, the Committee has met fifteen times to review items within its purview. In addition to the ongoing budget work with staff, the Committee has submitted recommendations for revisions to the Districts' Procedures for Selection· of Professional Engineer- ing and Architectural Services and fdr Implementation of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage. Both recommendations· have been adopted by the Boar<;Is of Directors. Transmitted herewith are the proposed Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets for the 1978-79 fiscal year. During the course of the budget process the Committee approved statements of departmental goals and objectives, which are set forth in the personnel recommendations, prior to the preparation of the preliminary budget documents. The enclosed joint works budgets have been prepared in accordance with the Fiscal Policy Committee Guidelines adopted by the Joint Boards. Inasmuch as these budgets are extremely complex and the Committee's time and other resources are limited, it is suggested that a totally unqualified endorsement by the Committee is not possible at this time. Rather, it is recommended that the budget be supported by the Executive Committee on the basis that it is a status quo projection of current operating procedures adjusted for inflation and to accommodate recent decisions of the Joint Boards including self-insurance ~ in-house computer system, sludge dewatering to reduce hauling costs, etc. Memo to Executive Committee May 17, 1978 Page 2 The proposed 1978-79 budget also· includes added costs to reflect regulatory requirements and increased operating costs .attributable to plant expansion. It is further recommended that the Committee continue to study various aspects of the budget once it is approved. In this way we will be able to continue to provide appropriate recommendations such as those previously adopted and on other matters like continued SCCWRP support, sludg~ marketing, etc. If approved by the Boards the joint requirements will be incorporated as line items in the official budgets of the individual Districts to be con- sidered by the respective Boards at the regular August meet~ng. Director James B. Sharp, Chairman Director Donald Holt Director Richard Olson Director Paul Ryckoff r --,- May 17, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Joint Boards of Directors SUBJECT: 1978-79 Budget Report for: JOINT OP.ERATING FUND (Including Personnel Recommendations) and CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Transmitted herewith are the personnel recommendations and proposed budgets for the Joint Operating Fund (JO) and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) for the 1978-79 fiscal year. JO & CORF Budgets The pfficial budgets of the individual Districts will not be adopted until the August 9th meeting of the respective Boards of Directors. However, consideration of the joint Districts' budgetary requirements is the first step in the annual budget process. The JO budget funds the operation and maintenance of the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. Admin- istrative activities and R & D are also included in the Joint Operating Fund. The Dlstricts share the cost of joint operations based on their annual gallonage flow through the treatment system. The CORF budget accounts for construction funding of the joint works facilities at the treatment plant sites. Construction costs are shared by the individual Districts based on a three year average of their gallonage flow and assessed valuation. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets do not, as such, have a tax rate levied. Following action by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting, the approved JO and CORF requirements will be incorporated into the respective operating and accumulated capital outlay fund budgets of the individual Districts. Each District's Board will then separately consider its 1978-79 budget (which includes the share of JO and CORF) at the August meeting of the Boards. Following adoption of each Districts' budget require- ments, the Board of Supervisors will then set the tax rates during the last week in August. Accounting Systems The Joint Operating account classifications conform to the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the State Controller. The Districts have expanded the Uniform System considerably to produce additional information deemed Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 2 desirable for administering and controlling financial activities. An integral part of the system is a comprehensive cost accounting program that maintains detailed records of maintenance and operational expenditures and assists the staff in effectively monitoring costs. The staff has recommended Uniform System revisions to the State Controller which would make it more adaptable and result in considerable accounting cost savings. Implementation of the revenue program will require modifications to the accounting systems in 1978-79. Installation of the in-house mini-computer recently approved by the Boards will accomodate the revisions and enable the staff to exercise even tighter reins on controllable expenditures. Funds are included in the JO and CORF budgets for the in-house system. Carry-Over During the current year, work on several projects and implementation of certain programs have been delayed for various reasons. For example, work on the waste activated sludge thickening study and polymer and toxicity studies and implementation of the Revenue Program due to changes in federal law to name just a few. Further, this year's budget provided for operation of the new 46 MGD activated sludge facility at Plant No. 1 starting last October. However, the contractor did not finish the project u~til January and we are just completing the shakedown. As a result of these delays and-deferral of hiring new employees to fill authorized but vacant positions, co~p .. led with efforts to control costs, there will be a substantial carry-over of unexpended funds from the 1977-78 fiscal year in the amount of $1. 1 million which will be available to apply against the 1978-79 budgetary requirements. It is expected that full employment of authorized positions will be necessary in 1978-79 to fulfill departmental objectives and responsibilities. The major sources of carry-over will be from payroll savings and the odor control and chemical coagulents accounts due to delay of secondary start-up and completion of foul air scrubbing facilities; research and monitoring because of rescheduling of studies to next year; and from professional services because of postponement of revenue program implementation mentioned previously. Delay in the receipt of State and Federal grant reimbursement for operation of the JPL-ACTS facility will reduce the carry-over that would have otherw"i'se been available, to the amount set forth above. Some of the CORf carry-over is for similar reasons but the bulk of the $11.3 million is from the advanced treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 which was awarded three months behind schedule and subsequently delayed further because of heavy rains, projects pending State and/or Federal approval or completion of studies, and the requirement to fully appropriate current funds for work that will sometimes be spread over several budget years. It should be pointed out that although the carry-over is reflected in the Joint Operating budget documents (primarily for Directors' information), the funds are actually held in the Operating Fund of each individual District and applied to the following year's budget requirements for the respective Districts. This has the effect of reducing the net tax levy of "" I• Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 ~ Page 3 each District. Throughout the year, funds are transferred to JO only as needed to meet expenditures as they are incurred. Monies, while on deposit in the individual Districts' accounts, are invested in short-term governmental securities from which the Districts realize a substantial interest income annually. Similar procedures are followed with respect to funding of CORF from the individual Districts• Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds. Increased Joint Works Requirements Attributed to Federal and State Regulations and Inflationary Trends The increases in joint works budget·requirements for both capi~al (CORF) and operations {Joint Operating} are essentially attributable to federal and state regulations. CORF: To meet provisions of the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act (PL92-500) and regulations promulgated pursuant to said Act by the Environ- mental Protection Agency {EPA) and the State (SWRCB) and Regional (RWQCB) Water Quality Control Boards, the Districts will be required to expend $210,760,000 during the next six years for plant expansion to construct advanced {secondary) treatment works for total plant capacity and other needed facilities. A $32 million project for the first increment of this work, a 46 MGD activated sludge treatment facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1 is now complete and being phased into operation. The second increment of 75 MGD at Plant No. 2, totalling $50 million, is under way at Plant No. 2. Directors are aware that, largely through the efforts of our Districts, Congress amended PL92-500 in December, 1977, to allow the administrator of EPA to grant a waiver to the full secondary treatment requirements for ocean dischargers, provided certain conditions are met. However, the draft regulations implementing this provision, as presently written, make it virtually impossible for any agency to qualify. There is no scientific evidence to support a full secondary treatment requirement for deep water ocean dischargers. Our Directors and staff are, therefore, working vigorously to change the regulations before they are finalized to allow a responsible guideline consistent with environmental goals for granting waivers as intended by Congress. If our application for a waiver is successful it will reduce the esiimated capital expansion cost by $95 million. If unsuccessful, it will be necessary to proceed with plans to construct full secondary treatment capacity for 225 MGD in accordance with the cash flow schedule included with the CORF budget. Presently, EPA funds 75% of the cost of approved treatment projects and SWRCB. 12!%. The Districts pay the balance from local tax revenue. The state, however, is out of construction grant monies and has placed a bond proposition on the June ballot to underwrite further funding for its Clean Water Grant Program, If the proposition fails the Districts' share would double. In that event the cash flow projection included with the CORF budget recommendations would have to be materially revised to reflect the additional local revenue that would have to be raised to offset the reduction of grant receipts. The outcome of the bond authorization will be known on June 7th and any appropriate' changes to the CORF budget and income/expense projections can be made before the Boards consider adoption of their final budgets in August. Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 4 JO: Over and above the capital cost, full secondary treatment will almost triple our on-going operating costs. The new facilities and expanded processes require additional personnel for operation and maintenance. There is a major impact on our demand for chemicals, repair parts, utilities and other items that is directly related to the advanced treatment facilities. NPDES permit requirements also add to our operating and monitoring costs. The more indirect costs of administrative, personnel, accounting.and procurement divisions must likewise increase to support the growing operational activities. Directors have also been advised of the Federal and State requirement for implementation of a User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery Revenµe Program for funding maintenance and operating costs and to recover the Federal portion of grant monies allocable to the industrial community. In December the law was amended to allow ad valorem taxes for funding of maintenance and operation costs. Interpretation of the Act prior to the amendment required a user charge system for such costs. Although the change will result in a consider- able administrative overhead cost saving to the Districts by partially relieving the burden of levying use charges and billing users of Districts services, implementation of the Revenue Program by July, 1979, will be a monumental task, at best. Phase I (Revenue Program Document) which was commissioned by the Boards last year is near completion but it must be modified to incorporate the ad valorem provisions as now allowed. Phase I I (detailed design and implementation) was recently approved by the Boards. However, upon recommendation of the SWRCB we are presently delaying the completion of Phase I and commencement of full work on Phase I I to avoid duplication of effort pending issuance of new user charge regulations by EPA. The problem is further complicated by the Jarvis-Gann initiative. Its" passage would affect the Districts• user charge structure and its presence has influenced our decision to postpone completion of Phase I and I I. It should be understood that the Revenue Program, once implemented, will have an impact on our staffing and administrative costs which, as yet, are indet- erminable. Budget estimates for 1978-79 have not addressed these requirements pending completion of the Program and resolution of the above issues. When finished, specific recommendations for additional personnel, equipment, office space requirements and other overhead items needed for compliance will be submitted to the Boards. At that time, consideration of a reallocation of budget appropriations may also be necessary to fund the effort. Directors are also well aware of past and current inflationary trends and rising labor costs recognized nationwide. We need not take further space here to acknowledge this fact. Suffice to say that although the inflation rate somewhat stabilized during the past year, it appears to be started on the upswing again. Because of the nature of the materials, supplies and services that the Districts procure the increases immediately affect our cost of operations. The impact of the above on the joint works requirements will be a $1.3 million ....._,,;· (20%) increase in the net Joint Operating budget over last year. Although the Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 5 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund requirements will increase $2.8 million (10%) in 1978-79, because of the Districts fiscal policies and long range planning, sufficient construction reserves have been accumulated for treatment plant expansion to enable a $2.2 million (27%) decrease in the amount to be raised by taxes for CORF. The CORF tax levy can be stabilized at the 1978-79 rate, or reduced, for the next several years, subject to the previously discussed availability of State construction grant monies and receipt of a waiver for secondary treatment. Sum~urizcd below are comparative figures for totul joint requirements. It is antic i piltcd th:it the cqu i v.:i 1 ~nt comf.d ncd tux rate rellU i reJ for a 11 Li is tr i cts to finuncc the joint works operations and phmt expansion wi 1 J. decrease approximately 4.8 cents in 1978-79 based on an estimated 15% jump in assessed values. COMPARISON OF JOINT WORKS BUDGETS Equivalent Total Reguirements* Available Fund in~~'; Raised by Taxes~'; Tax Rate 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78. 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 JO $ 7.3 $ 8.8 $ .9 $ 1. 7 $ 6.4 $ 7. 1 9.3¢ 8.9¢ CORF 28.2 31.0 20.0 25.0 8.2 6.0 11. 9¢ ~ $35.5 $39.8 $20.9 $26.7 $14.6 $13. 1 21.2¢ 16.4¢ *Hill ions of Dollars Impact of Jarvis-Gann The Jarvis-Gann tax limitation initiative which has been placed on the ballot for the June 6th election will, if passed: -Limit ad valorem property taxes to one percent (1%) of the full cash value of the property. -.. Require counties to 1 evy the one-percent ( 1 %) tax and "apportion it according to law to the districts (taxing agencies) within the counties." -Establish as a basis for "full cash value" the county assessor's appraised value as of March 1, 1975 (property subsequently sold or improved would be reappraised). -Limit increases in fair market value to two percent (2%) per annum. -Become effective July 1, 1978 (twenty-three days after adoption) The impact of the initiative on the Sanitation Districts can be summarized into three basic issues: ..... Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 ~ Page 6 1. Will it be necessary for the Districts to compile dual budgets for 1978-79? 2. What is the short-term financing alternative? 3. What is the long-term financing alternative? Following is a general discussion of each issue. 1. 1978-79 Dual Budgeting: Although consideration of the joint works budgets for maintenance and operation (JO) and construction (CORF) of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities will take place at the regular June 14th meeting, as pointed out on page one said budgets do not, as such, levy a tax. Rather, following approval by the Joint Boaras, they are incorporated into and become a line item of the official budg~t of each District to be considered in August. There would, therefore, be sufficient time to consider any revisions deemed necessary to the JO and CORF budgets and to prepare and review the individual District budgets after the outcome of the election is known. Because of the public health and safety nature of the Districts' activities and the regulatory requirements we face, it is unlikely, however, that JO and CORF budgets could be appreciably reduced regardless of the imposition of Jarvis-Gann. Instead, alternative funding as discussed below would become necessary. 2. Short-Term Financing Alternative: Although there are several unknowns with respect to the allocation of revenues collected under Jarvis-Gann to the various taxing agencies, the Districts could lose between $12 and $13 million in tax revenue in 1978-79. This represents a 58% overall reduction, ranging from 43% in District No. 7 to 66% in District No. 11. The loss could be as much as 100% ($21 million) depending on the final determination as to how tax monies collected will be distributed. It will, therefore, require that the Districts develop alternative funding sources. Pursuant to the Boards' pay-as-you-go policy, each District has been accumulating capital funds to finance the local (District) share of advanced treatment facilities required by the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act as well as their respective master planned trunk sewers. A portion of the accumulated capital reserve funds could be reallocated in 1978-79 to temporarily provide operating and debt retirement funding until a permanent long-range funding alternative could be developed and implemented. Any construction reserves used in 1978-79 would have to be replaced in the following years. 3. Long-Term Financing Alternative: While the previously mentioned amendments allowing ad valorem taxes to satisfy Revenue Program financing of maintenance and operating costs were pending before Congress, the Districts were required to do a considerable amount of preliminary work on a user charge/ billing system. Therefore, the groundwork for developing an alternative revenue system has been laid and, in the event the initiative passes and it becomes necessary to implement a separate user charge/billing system to fund Districts• activities, much of the initial work has already been completed. With an intensive (and expensive) effort, implementation of an alternative billing method could _.. -. - ... · --:.. ~· Memo to Joint Boards May 17, 1978 Page 7 be commenced within one to two years to replace the ad valorem tax system. The most cost-effective manner would be to place the use charge on the property tax bill for collection. We presently have statutory authority to do this and with the cooperation of County agencies it could be accomplished. It should be pointed out that any alternative billing system will require additional staffing and other resources that have not been included in the 1978-79 budgets. JWS:dt J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary r . -.---~ ...... --19 ~ ... _ _-', -- .... · COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ~ . . .. ,.,,,,/ OF ORANGE COUNTY \ ~-··. ·. BU·DGET -RECOMMENDATIONS. JOINT OPERATING FUND . ...... 4. \ · 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR ... , ( ( (, rt\ \ I SCHEDULE I. JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER (1) (2) (3) 4 (5) 6 Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over 1977-78* Budget or 1976-77 Expenditures or to· Fiscal 1978-79 (Decrease) 1977-78 (Decrease) Vear 1978-79 Salaries, Wages & Benefits $4,737,884 $5,6lt4,lt83 $ 906,599 $3,607,413 $4,165,909 $ 558,lt96 $ 571,975 LESS Chargebacks to CORF & Dlsts. 1'1000 2000 1 2000 2000 -o-110l l 19lt5 111191500 __ 1071555 ~ 119 1 ~ooi Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits Chargeable to JO $3,737,884 $4,644,483 $ 906,599 $2,595,468 $3,046,409 $ 450,941 $ 691,475 Materials, Supplies & Outside Services 953,000 1,076,000 123,000 741 ,030 1,217,766 476,736 (264,766) Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 720,000 850,000 130,000 371,373 461,805 90,432 258, 195 Research & Monitoring 288,000 . 247,000 (41,000) 211,766 122,lt62 (89,304) 165,538 Professional & Contract Services 757,000 544,000 (213,000) 215,367 308,136 92,769 448,864 Utilities 883,000 11405,000 522,000 593 2647 7951477 201.830 87,523 Total Joint Operating Expenses $7,338,884 $8,766,483 $1,427,599 $4,728,651 $5,952,055 $1,223,lt04 $1,386,829 Revenue and Offsets 521.000 6142000 931000 174 1961 2171547 42 1 586 3031453 Net Joint Operating $6~811 1 884 $8 1 152~48.3 $1 233Jf,599 .$~!553.690 .$517341508 $11180!818 $1!083,376 ( ( ( SCHEDULE II ;.1 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND Fiscal Year 1978-79 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TAX LEVY GALLONAGE FLOWS FUNDING 1977-78 COMPARISON .. ... ·• 1977-78 Estimated Estimated Amount to District . Flows Estimated . 1977-78 % District Estimated be Raised District Amount Raised No. (Past Year) Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover by Taxes Contribution by Taxes ;. ··.-·~ .• < ·)...~ .~~ 7,696 MG 153 MG 7,849 MG 11.33% $ 923,676 $ 125,455 $ 798,221 $ 789,511 $ 748,398 .. 2 21,459 858 22,317 32.20 2,625'100 .337,363 2,287,737 2, 123~089 2,003,917 3 a1,560 431 21,991 31. 73 2,586,783 348,413 2,238,370 2, 192,631 2,068,691 5 3,852 77 3,929 5.67 462,246 63,052 399, 194 396,8oi 376,151 6 4,099 81 4, 180 6.03 491,595 66,628 424,967 419,300 398,575 7 4,383 87 4,470 6.45 525,835 70,636 455, 199 444,526 420,421 11 4,478 89 4,567 6.59 537,248 71,829 465,419 452,026 426,269 TOTALS 67,527 1,776 HG 69,303 HG 100.00% $8,152,483 $1,083,376 $7,069,107 $6,817,884 $6,442,422 i JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR ~ DISTRICT & FUND: DEPARTMENT: CLASS I FI CATION: Joint Operating Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE iALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits; Retirement (OCERS) Workers' Compensation U~ployment Insurance Group Medical Insurance APPROVED BUDGET 1977-78 4,033,805 260,656 125,162 61,333 218,567 ACTUAL EXPEHDITURES RECOMMENDED 1977-78 BUDGET (4th qtr estd) 1978-79 3,594,061 4,811,001 225,667 386,476 115,389 112,420 13,32lt 38,487 254,703 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO.: RE HARKS May 12 , 1978 . 111 1 The separate report on personnel recommendations details the projected gross salaries and wages assuming full employment of authorized positions. Several projects and implementation of certain programs budgeted for 77-78 have been delayed as previously reported to the Boards. Because of these delays and our ability to adjust plant operational modes, we have been able to avoid filling several budgeted positions thereby enabling substantial payroll savings this year that will be carried over and available to apply against the 78-79 requirements. It is anticipated that it will be necessary to fill these vacant positions in the coming year to effectively meet departmental responsibilities. Projections include anticipated adjustments for Supervisory and Administrative/Clerical employee groups pursuant to existing MOU's. However, we do not presently have an MOU with the Operational group and no allowance has been made in the budget for general salary or fringe benefit adjustments that may be forthcoming from any mid-year negotiated agreement with that group. In· the event changes are authorized and any accumulated payroll savings are inadequate to fund the adjustments, it will be necessary to allocate funds from the unappro- priated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. Remarks above under Salaries and Wages re full employment of authorized positions, carry over and employee groups apply. Specific line item comments follow. OCERS has advised that the retirement contribution rate may increase as much as 25% as a result of a change in actuarial assumptions and a rate evaluation. This increase is included in the budget. Pursuant to the Boards' action implementing self- insurance for Workers' Compensation, State Compen- sation Insurance Fund coverage will be discontinued eff~ctive July 1st. This account includes anticipated loss experience based on the consultants' report and the estimated premium for excess loss coverage as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Convnlttee. Self-insurance reserves will be included In the individual District Operating Fund budgets, Recent legislation requires the Districts to participate In the unemployment insurance program effective 1-1-78. Rates had not been determined at budget time last year but are now set at .8%. HMO plan premium increased this year and pursuant to the two-year agreement with employee. groups, the added cost was borne by the Districts. JOHff WORKS OPERATrnG BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR Dr-rRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 12, 1978 111 DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Sunmary ACTUAL APPROVED EXPENDITURES DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET 1977-78 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) - SALARIES 2 WAGES & BENEFITS (cont) Uniform Rental 38,361 25,000 TOTAL PAYROLL 4,737,884 4,165,909 LESS: Chargebacks to Joint Works Capital Outlay and lndi- vidual Districts 1,000,000 1,119,500 '._/ NET JO PAYROLL 3,737,884 3,046,409 . MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel 70,000 106,238 Insurance 145,000 102,899 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1978-79 41,396 5,644,483 1,000,000 4,644,483 90,000 76,000 SCHEDULE: PAGE NO,: 2 REMARKS Budget projection· is in accordance with employee unit agreements and allows for anticipated price increase when current three-year vendor contract expires. Charged back to CORF through cost accounting system for work on treatment plants' capital expansion; and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion, and maintenance and repair of said systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective Districts. Represents balance of payroll expenses chargeable to operation and maintenance of joint treatment and disposal works; and administrative and research activities • For both fixed and mobile equipment. Gross expense indicated with motor pool chargebacks reflected under revenue. Budget allocation reflects increased requirements for new equipment being placed into service and allows for moderate price increases. Current year expense includes initial Pl-16 diesel fuel tank capping re initial start-up authorized by Boards. This fuel is for in-lieu primary. power purchase and is,therefore, being reclassified to the Utilities account for the 1978-79 budgetary appropriation. Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-County travel policy, employee fidelity bond, boiler, fire, umbrella liability and anticipated primary liability claims. Directors are aware of the state of turmoil that the public sector insurance industry has experienced during the past several years and the resultant skyrocketing premium increases. There is a groWing reluctance to underwrite coverage for governmental agencies. The Board has, therefore, adopted a self-insurance plan effective July 1st for Workers' Compensation (see above) and liability coverage. Pursuant to said plan (see separate Fiscal Policy Committee report) primary liability coverage (up to $300,000 per incident) will be self-insured by the Districts. r ~ ... JOifff \'IORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECDr1MErmATIOtlS 1973-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: SCHEDULE: Hay 12, 1978 111 DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Sunvnary PAGE NO, : 3 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE Office Expense · Operating Supplies: · ~lorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services P~sslonal Services APPROVED BUDGET 1977-78 45,000 300,000 420,000 147,000 390,000 367,000 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1977-78 (4th qtr es td) 22,300 198,592 263,213 97,415 262,688 45,448 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1978-79 47,000 300,000 550,000 147,000 456,000 88,000 REMARKS Insurance -Remarks, cont'd. Other costs of self-insurance program are included under payroll and benefits, contractual services and professional services accounts. The self- insurance reserve will be carried in the individual District Operating Fund budgets. This account includes supplies and forms for all departments as well as postage. Although the current year expense is well within the budget the appro- priation has been slightly increased because of expected one-time costs next year to convert to an in-house computer system and implement the revenue program required by SWRCB and EPA. A postal rate increase is also pending. Budget allocation is primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Expenditures in 1978-79 will • rise as a result of increased mitigation efforts Specifically, new foul air scrubbers at Plant No. 1 and additional prechlorination at both plants. Our NPDES permit requires extensive chemical treatment with polymers. The new activated sludge process at Plant No. 1 will substantially increase our solids treatment which utilizes these chemicals. The budget has, therefore, been increased to allow for the added volume. Supplies required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities and laboratory work. Recommended allocation reflects anticipated require- ments for operation of new facilities. Includes trucking of solids, trash disposal and EDP. Budget has been raised to allow for increased sludge volume and unit cost as reported to the Boards in May. Appropriation also reflects addition of microfilm and word processing services to maximize filing and report writing effectiveness. Allocation also provides new items for independent claims adjusting services for workers• compensation and liability claims as required by self-insurance plan. EDP service bureau costs will continue throughout the year until conversion to approved In-house system is completed, then be eliminated in the 1979-80 budget year. Includes General Counsel, audit by CPA and other miscellaneous accounting consulting, odor consultant, miscellaneous engineering services and new Item for safety engineering consultant re loss control efforts relative to self-Insurance program. Budget has been substantially reduced to reflect transfer of Phase II Revenue Program work from JO to CORF. ........ .; . ~ """""' JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: Hay 12, 1978 111 DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE Printing & Publications Rents & Leases -Equipment Repairs & Maintenance '.._,/ Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Uncollectable Accounts Ut i1 ities APPROVED BUDGET 1977-78 41,000 22,000 413,000 288,000 25,000 1,000 883,000 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1977-78 (4th qtr estd) 29,928 19,224 452,640 122,462 21 ,966 365 795,477 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1978-79 50,000 25,000 518,000 247,000 37,000 2,000 1,405,000 SCHEDULE: PAGE NO.: 4 REMARKS Budget increased to reflect both increasing prices and continuing demand by public for information on Districts' activities. Staff continuing to utilize for reporting and analysis for maximum effectiveness. Cost will also Increase somewhat for additional repro equipment necessary because of decentralization of certain administrative functions. Primarily for heavy equipment required intermit- tently for major facilities r.epairs. This item is of a highly contingent nature and must allow for unexpected major equipment failures and maintenance of new facilities that are con- tinually being placed into service as plant con- struction projects are completed. Over $30 million of new capital plant facilities are being phased Into operation for which parts and supplies are charged to this account. Includes Districts' contribution to So. Calif. Coastal Research Project being conducted under joint powers agreement, and required ocean mon- itoring. Also provides operational research and evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters. Work on several operational and industrial waste project studies budgeted for 77-78 has been delayed and the funds are being rebudgeted for next year. Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies require increased Board member and staff travel (ie., secondary treatment regulations). Districts also continue to emphasize ongoing training of employees as operation of facilities becomes more technical and complex. The budget has been increased to include an intensive training program for the Districts' key supervi- sory personnel to enhance their skills for effectively managing their respective divisions. Bad debts. Major item is purchased electrical power. Increas- ing costs plus the demand for full scale operation of sludge dewatering equipment and the new second- ary treatment plant will increase the electrical power budget to $1.1 million. Diesel fuel for In-lieu power generation has been added to this budget item to provide funds for fueling the two new 1500 H.P. Pl-16 engines that can burn fuel at the rate of 900 g.p.d. The utilities account also includes purchase of natural gas which has been increased to provide for the addition of two new outfall booster engines, plant water and telephones and communications. The telephone budget has Increased significantly over the past few years to accomodate additional staffing and ~ JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIOU 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DATE: Hay 12, 1978 111 DEPARTMENT: CLASS I FI CATION: Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE Other Expenses Expenses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES TOTAL JO REQUIREMENTS LESS: Revenues NET JO REQUIREMENTS APPROVED BUDGET 1977-78 22,000 22,000 3,601,000 7,338,884 521 ,000 6,817,884 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1977-78 (lath qtr estd) 22,959 341,832 2,905,64~ 5,952,055 217,547 5,734,508 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1978-79 32,000 52,000 4, 122 ,000 8,766,483 614,000 8, 152,483 SCHEDULE: PAGE NO.: 5 REMARKS Utilities -Remarks, cont'd. extensive inter-agency communication required as a result of federal and state regulations and resultant new mandated programs as well as increased activities from. expanded operations (le., procurement activities, etc.). Items not chargeable elsewhere. Account required by Uniform Accounting System. This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. Pursuant to approval by the Boards in 1976 the Districts transferred from PERS to OCERS. In accordance with the terms of the transfer the Districts were to assume any accumulated liability under OCERS in excess of funds transferred from PERS. The liability was unknown when budgets were adopted and, were, therefore, excluded with a provision that any liability could be funded by a budget transfer. The one-time charge has been paid from this account and a transfer approved by the Boards. Budget for next year has been increased based on past experience. Current year budget included anticipated grant reimbursement for JPL-ACTS which has not been received and is therefore rebudgeted for next year. Balance of the budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment process by-products, equipment and sampling chargebacks to individual Districts and miscellaneous items. March 20 , 1978 (Revised) MEMO RA NDU M TO : Boa rd s of Di r ecto r s SUBJEC T : Summa r y Staff Repo rt on Personne l Recommendat i o ns for 1978-79 INTRO DUCT ION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA PO BOX8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 541).2910 (7 14)962·2411 Each yea r i n conj unction wi t h p r eparat i on of the J o i nt Ope r at i ng Fund Budget recommendations , the staff cond uc ts a n extensive survey of ant i c i pated personne l requ i rements. Project i ons are formu l ated fo r a five -yea r per i od wi t h part i c u l a r emphas i s on the immed i ate fisca l period under cons i de r a t ion. Staff recommendat ions are considered by the Boa r ds concurrent l y wi th the Joint Operat i ng Budget and approved changes are incorpo r ated into the current positions and sala ri es reso l utions . RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Fo r 1978-79 the staff is r ecomme nding author i zat i on for 7 new emp l oyees. These changes are more ful l y exp l ained in the fo l l ow i ng r eport under each respect i ve d i vision . Employme n t in many of the new pos i t i ons wi ll be defe r red until l ater i n the fi sca l yea r . The max i mum sa l ary cost (exc l usive of benefits) of t he changes is estimated to be $103,802, less than 3% of existing pay r o l l. During the current fiscal year we have been able to adj ust our mode of operation suffic i ently to avo ;d fi l l i ng .severa l author i zed oositions at a s ub stant ial payrol l sav i ngs estimated at $906,599. These fund s will be available to apply against the 1978-79 budgetary r equirements . It is anticipated that it wi ll be necessary to f ill these vacant positions in the coming year to effectively meet depa r tmen t al r esponsib i l i ties . Th e fol l ow i ng s ummarizes t he s t aff 's pe rsonne l recommendations for fisca l year 1978-79: Personn e l Cl ass ifi cations Professiona l Technical Skilled and Sem i-Sk i lled Cl e ri cal Recommended Net Addit i ons l 4 l l _7 _ Recommended Net Sala r y Cost of Add i t i ons and Adjustmen ts $ 16 ,500 67,684 9,3 18 10,300 $103,802 Ri s ing s lud ge volumes , increased indust r ia l surve il lance and operational monito r ing, and added recordkeep i ng as a r esu l t of faci l ities expansion are the primary r easons that add i tional personnel are needed. Wi th t he exception of two pos i t ion s which are r eq u ired for addit i ona l recordkeep ing for g rant funded facilities a lread y constru cted or p r esent l y und e r contract, the staff is withhold i ng specific recomme ndations at this time wi th r egard to added clerical and account i ng personne l i n t he Administrative Department and field personne l in the Indust r ia l Waste Di vision unt il the UC/ICR Rev e nue Pr og r am is fini s hed . Work on the program has been held in a beyance pending publication of new regulations promulgated as a resul t of the r ecent amendments to the Federal Wate r Po ll ut i on Control Act which wil l al l ow use of ad valorem taxes for user cha r ges . The final r egu l ations wi l l be i ssued in t he nea r future and the Revenue Pr ogram can then be f i na li zed. It i s expected that implementation of t he UC/I CR System will have a signifi cant i mpact on pe r sonne l requirements i n these categor i es . I t is, therefore, inappropriate to cons i de r changes in this regard unti l t he program is comp l e t ed somet i me in the next several months. At that time , recommendations wi l l be s ubmitted on staffing for i mp lementation of the program and authorized changes can be funded from the unappropr i ated reserve accounts of the respect i ve Districts and/or payro l l savings . Directors are further advised that i n the event the Jarvis-Gann tax limitation initiative passes, a substantia l i nc r ease i n cler i ca l personnel may be required to admin i ster any alternative funding prog ram that is adopted by the Boards. GENERAL BACKGROUND Operation and maintenance of our continual l y expand ing facilities constructed to handle increasing sewage flows and improved treatment processes , a nd the necessary technica l and administrative support, are the primary factors that influence ~anpower requireme nt s of the Di st ri cts. Th ere a r e p l ans present l y on th e drawing boards, or projects un der constructi on or recently completed, far we ll over $200,000,000 in capital exp~nsion . During the 1978-79 fiscal year the total flow processe d throug h the two treatment plants will increas e to almost 70 billi o n ga ll ons . Directors are well aware that r eg ulatory agencies continue to become inc r easi ngly active in the field of water quality cont rol. With the current e nvironmental emphasis, requir eme nts are being reviewed and change d by th e se bodies. Th e 19 72 Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires full secondary treatme nt for a ll dischargers of municipal waste . The Boards have previously been advised that the 1977 Amendme nts allow the Adm i nistrator of EPA to grant a wa iver to the secondary treatment r equ irements, provided certain conditions are met . How eve r, the draft r egulati ons implementing this prov ision, a s presently written, wou ld make it vi rtuall y impo ss ible for any agency to qualify. Our staff is working vigorously to change the regulations before they are finalized to a llow a responsible guideline consistent with e nvironmental goals for granting of waivers as intended by Congr ess. If we are unsuccessfu l, it will be necessa ry to proceed with plans for full secondary treatment capacity at an added ~apital cos t of $95,000,000 for facil i ties to bring treatment t o 225 million ga llon s pe r day. Present l y comp l e t e d or und er construction is 125 MGD of conventional activated sludge treatment works. The balance of the facilities wou ld depend up on a de cision relative to the JPL activated carbon treatment system. Thus, the effect on long-range personnel needs cannot be fully determined a t this time. It shou l d, therefo r e, be pointed out that accompa nying projections could be material l y affected by the extent of advanced treatment required and the processes utilized. Ne e dless to say, the impact of Environmental Protection Agency edicts, State Wate r Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulati ons, Regional Wat e r Quality Control Board directives, California Environmental Quality Act requireme nts, Coastal Commission regulations, labor laws --the list is end l ess --on the administrative function ha s been almost overwhelmin g in terms of the paper work/red tape create d, a nd the necessary tech ni cal and profess ional support required for compliance. NPDES pe rmit r eq uireme nts for the Di st ri cts, adopt e d by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Cont r ol Board in June, 1974, now requ i re ex t e n s ive chemical additions to the treatme nt process and a greatly expanded monitoring program. Th e RWQCB r e quire s that we conduct new oceanographic studies in addit i o n to the SCCWRP research work wh i ch ha s been und er way f o r the past six years. Th e 1972 legi s lation also r eq uires an inte nsi f ied program of point source contro l for industrial discharges to the system wh i ch was imp l emented l ast year. Im pleme ntation of the UC/I CR Revenue Program required by SWRCB and EPA wi ll have a significant impact on staffing and overhead costs without improving the quality of the wast ewater treatment one iota, as wi I I Jarvis-Gann If lt p~s~es. Research is a vital activity that enab les the Districts to eva luat e improved methods of treatme nt and operation .,,,.,,, and provides the suppo rt for t e chnologica l advances that effect maximum ope rational e fficiency. Th e Districts ' l eade r ship in thi s area i s well known. Our r esearch laboratory, one of the finest of its type, has great l y e nhanced our capabilities i n this area. Th e build i ng hou ses four separate l abo ratories: Marine Ecology Laboratory, Bacteriological Laboratory, Treatment Process Lab oratory, and Indu stria l Waste Laboratory. We are cont inuing our extens ive r esearch work in each of th e se areas. Directors are cognizant of the coope ra tive effort between our Resources Man agement Center , NASA and the Jet Propu lsion Laboratory (JPL) of the Cal i fornia Institu te of Tech nology, in d eve loping the activated carbon treatment system wh i ch appears to offer a technological break- through in the treatment of wastewater and s ludge. Th e pilot facility was con structed at Plant No. 2 under a $4.6 Step I grant from EPA and the State, and we are present l y evaluating the feasibility of continued analytical work at this facility. In t his r e gard it shou ld be pointed out that no personne l appropriations have been included in the budget for this work. Should it be deemed des irable lat er to con tinue the eva luation per i od, temporary authorization for said personnel and a budg e t transfer will be necessary . All of these factors have a direct and siqnificant influence on our manpower requirements and the organization and personne l complement of each department. Our projec tion s are based on the best estimates of anticipated needs arising from these factors, and observe the District po li cy of continually attempting to improve admini- strat ive and operational effectiveness and effic i ency. Previousl y reviewed statements of de partmental aims and objectives have been prepared and are outline d in the following material. Whil e the objectives are not limited to those specifical l y listed, a nd attempt is made to state gene rall y those areas which most direc tly affect the manpower needs. Each departme nt is endeavor ing to implem e nt improvements in a ll areas of assigned responsibili ·~.y ·._.·.o:':':':: -2- GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT Effective administration of the Districts requires constant monitoring of operating information and the current and projected fiscal position. The requirements of the management information system place a continually increasing demand on the activities of the General Administrative and Finance Department. Clerical support must also be provided for staff and board activities, and the additional work load required as a result of regulatory agency activities. The following are general objectives for the next several years in this department, all of which are presently in varying stages of development and implementation. Much of .this work is directed toward conforming to statutory requirements and those of regulatory bodies, the Boards of Directors, the County Auditor, and our Independent CPA auditing firm. a) Continue to expand uniform system of accounting and management information system to maximize effectiveness. The System of Uniform Accounting for Waste Disposal Districts, as prescribed by the State Controller's office, became mandatory on July I, 1970. The Districts have expanded the system beyond the requirements of the State Controller to provide additional information deemed necessary for effective management. Our system has been used as a model throughout the State. Revenue program requirements will require further modifications of the system. b) Phase I of the Revenue Program will address the impact on District EDP requirements. The Districts' consultant has indicated that it would be advantageous to consider in-house EDP capabilities. Pursuant to the Board direction it will be necessary to expand capabilities of the existing XCS System or install a new in-house system. c) Implement revenue program of user charges and industrial cost recovery required pursuant to 1972 and 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in connection with construction grant funding. d) Update and complete implementation of new centralized purchasing and warehousing policies and procedures. e) Complete implementation and centralization of personnel administration policies and procedures. f) Implement centralized fi 1 ing. g) Conduct training programs for supervisors and foremen in the area of budgeting, cost control, supervision and basic source document input for cost accounting and management information system. h) Continue to expand program of public information and awareness. i) In conjunction with Fiscal Policy Committee, establish authorized limitation of expenditures within approved budgetary appropriation for each department/division. Support required of the Administrative and Finance Department brought about by the impacts and objectives described above reflect in the demand for additional on-going clerical and professional support summarized below for 1978-79: Reco111nenda ti on The completion this year of $32 million activated sludge treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 and the $50 million ex- pansion at Plant No. 2, now underway, will require an additional Accountant, Range 1054C ($1373/1709), to handle the added fixed asset record- keeping We expect to finalize the centralization of the person- nel administration activities this year. To complete the Personnel Division reorgani- zation it is recommended that the classification of Personnel Assistant, Range 1048A ($974/1213), and Personnel Aide, Range 1047A ($922/1149), be created to more appropriately reflect the responsibilities of this office. Existing employees will be re- classified to the new job titles and their current positions (Secretary I, Range 1048A, $974/1213 and Accounting Technician, Range 1047A, Classification Add: Accountant -3- Earliest Effective Date Positions 10/06/78 Personnel Net Cost or (Savings) $ 13,672.00 Recommend at ion $922/1149) can, accordingly, be . ~· deleted. There wi 11 be no 13. S8'1. O()idd it ion a I cost associated i ·· ~ with the change. With the r1s1ng volume of account- ing transactions brought about as a direct consequence of plant ex- pansion it will be necessary for existing accounting personnel to assume additional responsibilities. It is, therefore, recommended that one Accounting Technician position, Range 1047A ($922/1149), be deleted and upgraded to Intermediate Accounting Technician, Range I048A, ($974/1213). A Sr. Records Clerk position, Range 1044F ($809/1009), in the Purchasing/Warehousing Division is being assigned increased responsibility in the procurement function. To reflect this changing role it is recommended that the clas- sification of Purchasing Aide, Range 1047A ($922/1149), be created. The existing Sr. Records Clerk position should be retained in the organiza- tional structure to provide necessary clerical help to assist in the administration of the activated sludge facilities being constructed at Plant No. 2. Classification Add: Personnel Asst. Add: Personnel Aide . Delete: Secretary I Delete: Accounting Tech. Add: Inter. Acctg. Tech. Delete: Acctg. Tech. Add: Purchasing Aide Earliest Effective Date .6/30/78 6/30/78 6/30/78 6/30/78 6/30/78 6/30/78 10/06/78 Sub-Totals -Administrative and Finance Department MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Maintenance and Construction Divisions Positions t t ( 1) ( 1) I (1) _l_ 2 Personnel I t (1) (I) 1 (1) 2 Net Cost or (Savings) $ 13,589.00 13,o42.00 ( l 3;589.00) ( 13,042. 00) $ 14,560.00 (13,790.00) $ 9,530.00 $ 23,972.00 In addition to the continuing facilities expansion at the treatment plants, several Districts have Master Plan construction programs under way. As we continue to place collection and treatment facilities on the line, personnel are required to repair and maintain equipment, structures, and sewer lines in an operational condition. The general aims and objectives of the Maintenance Divisions are directed to this end: a) Continue to expand the preventative maintenance program to enable optimum equipment performance with a minimum of unscheduled equipment down time. b) Provide necessary emergency and standby equipment and training of personnel to enable operations to continue in the event of equipment failures or other emergencies, and for scheduled down time for major maintenance and repair jobs. c) Continue implementation of improved digester cleaning procedures which will provide increased safety by eliminating the need for men to enter the structures and yet allow the work to be expedited. d) Continue to work with the consulting engineers in conducting periodic water-height surveys of the District trunks to aid in projecting future sewage flows and the hydraulic capacity requirements of the collection systems. e) Continue to work in the area of treatment plant and pump station site improvements to improve the appearance, including area lighting, landscaping, painting, paving and odor control measures. f) Continue to modify and relocate electrical equipment switch gear to eliminate potential equipment failures due to the presence of excessive water. Recommended changes for these divisions are as follows: -4- ""-' \._) Recommendation Plant Maintenance & Projects Division No additional personnel or changes requested for 1978-79 Collection Facilities Division During the next year we will place our 35th pump station into service. In order to provide the proper maintenance supervisi~n for these stations It is reconvnended that two Pump Station Mechanic I l's, Range 1050E ($1118/1392), be promoted to the new classification of Lead Pump Station Mechanic, Range 1051C ($1165/1451) a 4. 125% increase Mechanical Division A realignment of duties in our shop has resulted in one of our Mechanic ll's, Range lOSOE ($1118/1392) performing full-time machinist's work. The staff, therefore, recom- mends creation of a Machinist classification, Range 1051C ($1165/1451), to reflect the nature of this employee's assignment. This represents a 4. 125% increase. Electrical Division With the expansion of treatment facilities the instrumentation equipment that monitors and controls our operations has become increasingly sophisti- cated, requiring a higher level of technically trained personnel and assignment of added ~mployees to handle the load. In order to properly direct the activities of the Instrumentation Group the staff feels a supervisory level position is now warranted. Further, a transfer and upgrading of several classifications within the division is suggested. To accomplish the necessary changes it Is recommended that the classi- fication of Instrumentation Supervisor, Range 1056F ($1563/1947), be established to replace the classi- fication of Sr. Instrumentation ·Foreman, Range 1055F ($1480/1843), representing a 5.5% increase; and that one each Lead Instrumentation Technician, Range 1053A ($1283/1596), and Instru- mentation Technician I I, Range 10520 ($1239/1543), be added to in lieu of an Electrical Techni- "-""ctan .11, Range 1052D ($1239/1543), and an Instrumentation Technician I, Range 1050E ($118/1392) Class i fi cat ton Add: Lead Pump Station Mechanic Delete: Pump Station Mechanic 11 Add: Machinist Delete: Mechanic II Add: Instr. Supv Delete: Sr. Instr. Foreman Add: Lead Instr. Tech. Add: Instr. Tech. 11 Delete: Elect. Tech. I I Delete: Instr. Tech. I Earliest Effective Date Positions Personnel 10/06/78 10/06/78 •' ; 10/06/78 10/06/78 6/30/78 6/30/78 10/06/78 6/30/78 6/30/78 10/06/78 2 (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 1 (1) 1!l 2 (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 1 (1) ill Sub-Totals -Maintenance and Construction Division -o--o- -5- Net Cost or (Savings) $ 12,722.00 (12,206.00) $ 12,722.00 (12 ,206. 00) $ 23,358.00 (22,110.00) 13,999.00 18,512.00 (18,512.00) (12,206.00) $ 4,073.00 . --~ ........ Operations & Laboratory and Research Division In addition to our ongoing research activities, these divisions, of course, have responsibility for the overall treatment function and necessary controls that must be established to assure that treatment requirements and dis- charge standards are met. Their aims and objectives are to this end and, in effect, all other departments provide support activities toward the Operations Division's goals. a) Improve overall treatment with particular emphasis on floatable solids removal by: Extending pilot studies on fine screening of final effluent; expanding full plant scale operation to centrifuge total volume of digester flows; and implement use of chemical flocculents in several of the existing unit processes. b) Stabilize operating parameters and procedures for new secondary treatment facilities. c) An intensified effort for the control of odors at both plants will be continued by studying the effectiveness and cost of various levels of prechlorination and of controlling odors in contained areas, such as grit chambers and headworks, by chemical means. d) Intensify efforts to beneficially recycle all by-products resulting from treatment processes, in conjunction with the Districts' Resources Management Center. e) Modify mode of operation to comply with NPDES permit requirements. f) Continue development of analysis program to assure compliance with NPDES permit and industrial source control ordinances. Recommended changes for these divisions are as follows: Recommendation Operations Division The 75 MGD Secondary Treatment Installation at Plant No. 2 will have computerized process control. The staff is recommending that the position of Operations Assistant Engineer, Range 1055F ($1480/1843) be upgraded to Associate Engineer, Range 1058A ($1687/2099) to oversee this function as well as certain research work in the Resources Management Center. With the startup of the activated sludge facilities our solids handling volume has increased 33% and we have expanded the solids dewatering program. It is, therefore, necessary to request two Plant Operator I positions, Range 1048E ($1002/1248), to absorb the added work load. Staff is recommending that a Control Center Clerk II, Range l046G ($910/1134) be esta- blished to recognize the increased control center monitoring tasks and complete the career ladder positioning in this division. The Clerk I I will require operator cert- ification consistent with other classifi- cations in the division and will not require additional personnel as one Control Center Clerk I, Range 1043 ($737/917) will be deleted to provide for the position. Classification Add: Delete: Assoc Engr Ass't Engr Add: Plant Oper Add: Control Center Clerk I I Delete: Control Center Clerk I -6- Earliest Effective Date 6-30-78 6-30-78 10-06-78 4-06-79 4-06-79 Positions Personnel 1 (I) 2 (1) 1 (1) 2 (l) Net Cost or (Savings) $ 23,202.00 ( 20,374.00) $ 19,954.oo $ 2,813.00 2,275.00) ·"· ........... Recommendation Laboratory Research Division It is necessary to request that the new classification of Laboratory Analyst II I, Range 1048E ($1002/1248) be established to provide the technical leve1 required to perform lab analyses required for NPOES, industrial waste and the new secondary treatment facility; and one Part-time Technician (maximum hourly rate -$7.50) for analytical work relative to solids ~ewatering studies to be conducted during the year. Classification Add: Add: Lab Ana 1 • I I I Part-time Tech. Earl lest Effective Date 6-30-78 6-30-78 Sub-Totals -Operations and Laboratory & Research Divisions Sub-Totals -Maintenance and Operations Department ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Positions 2 1 .5 5 Personnel 2 1 5 5 Net Cost or (Savings) $ 31,866.00 15,600.00 $ 70,786.oo $ 74,859.00 The primary responsibility of this department remains in the area of administration and inspection of plant and district construction contracts. Capital expenditures for new facilities run over $200,000,000 during the next five years. Administration of the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and connection permits are assigned to this department. In this regard, the genera] objectives of the department are as follows: a) Continue evaluation of new treatment processes and beneficial recycling of a11 by-products in the Resources Management Center, emphasizing research and development of sludge dewatering techniques. b) Continue to administer all plant and district construction contracts including supervision and inspection. c) Continue to implement and enforce the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance and administer the issuance of industrial waste and connection permits, including inspection and collection of waste flow samples. Institute point source control program as required by new regulations. AJso provide the assurance that the safety and integrity of the Districts' co11ection system is being maintained. d) Keep records and record drawings, district boundary and annexation maps, trunk plan and profile drawings, right of way and easement data, shop drawings, equipment log and data sheets, catalogs and miscellaneous engineering administration files. e) Process State and Federal grant application records and data and prepare required manuals; other agency questionnaires; general drafting and preparation of contract cost data for fixed asset accounting. Recommendation Classification Our Resources Management Center will be faced with additional operational research and process control work as a result of bringing the advanced t~eatment facilities in 1 ine. It is, therefore, requested that an Engineering Aide I, Range J048A (974/1213) Add: position be upgraded to the classification of Environmental Specialist, Range 10536 Delete: ($1336/1662). Environmental Specialist Engineering Aide I Sub-Total Engineering Department Total -All Departments -7- Earliest Effective Date 6-30-78 6-30-78 Positions (1) -o- _ 7_ Personnel ( 1) -o- _7 _ $ ( $ Net Cost or (Savings) 18,387.00 13,416.00) la ,971. 00 $103,802.00 I co I ( Dept. or Div. Admin. & Finance Plant Mtce. & Projects Col 1. Facl. Mechanical Electrical Operations Laboratory & Research Engineering Non-Departmental TOTALS -JAO ( SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS 1978/79 FISCAL VEAR PROJECTED PERSONNEL(l) Recommended Changes Authorized Tota 1 Pe rsonne 1 Add or Delete Existing Recommended Positions Personnel Personnel 1978-79 2 2 36 38 -o--o-31 31 -o--o-21 21 -o--o-36 36 -o--o-21 21 2 2 50 52 3 3 19 22 -o--o-38 38 -o--o-2 2 7 7 254 261 Est'd Cost of Recommended Changes $ 23,972 -o- 516 516 3,041 23,320 47,466 4,971 -o- $103,802 (1) Does not Include 11 authorized temporary positions for completion of Phase Ila Revenue Program work. (2) Payroll estimates assume all positions filled in accordance with personnel reconmendatlons and include ( 3/20/78 · Schedule A PROJECTED SALARY COSTs(2) Est'd Salary Projection Total for Existing Salary Budget Personnel 1978-79 $ 823,549 $ 847,521 409, 116 409,116 354,817 355,333 576,381 576,897 412,432 415,473 903,300 926,620 323,178 370,644 904,426 909,397 -o-(3) $4,707,199 $4,811,001 any anticipated salary adjustments based on current three-year agreements with certain emploype organizations. Includes estimated salary for Phase Ila Revenue Program work. (3) Allocated ( ( SUMMARY OF FIVE-YEAR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 1978/79 1979/80 1980/81 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year fiscal Year Deeartment of Division Personnel Cost Personnel Cost Personnel fill Administrative & Finance 2 $23,972 4 $ 53,352 4 $ 53,675 Plant Mtce. & Projects -o--o-17,046 15,080 Collection Facilities -o-516 15,392 15,392 Mechanical -o-516 15,392 2 25,396 I "" I Electrical -o-3,041 17 ,649 2 32,438 Operations 2 23,320 2 25,064 2 34,092 Laboratory 3 47,466 15,933 15,288 Engineering -o-4,971 4 73,215 2 36, 774 TOTALS -JAO 7 $103,802 15 $233,043 15 $228,135 - Not adjusted for inflationary trends 1981/82/83 Fi sea 1 Years Personnel Cost 8 $ l 12, 121 10,733 13,988 13,988 17,046 8 120, 180 14,175 2 46, 124 23· $348,355 - ( 3/20/78 • Schedule B Total Five Years Personnel fill 18 $243,120 3 42,859 3 45,288 4 55,292 4 70, 174 14 202,656 6 92,862 8 161 ,084 60 $913,335 - 3/20/78 Schedule C ~ COMPARISON OF PROJECTED AND ACTUAL · PERSONNEL REQUESTS 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR Actual Projected Last Year Recommendations Increase for 1978-79 1978-79 (Savings) PERSONNEL COST PERSONNEL COST PERSONNEL COST Administrative t Finance 5 $ 64,085 2 $ 23 ,972-;'c (3) $( 40, 113) Plant and Projects 16,058 -o--o-(1) ( 16,058) Co 1 lect ion Faci 1 i ties -o--o--o-516 -o-516 Mechanical 3 40,955 -o-516 (3) ( 40~439) E l~ctri cal 2 37,576 -o-3,041 (2) ( 34,535) Operations 2 26, 124 2 23,320 -o-( 2 ,804) Laboratory 16,058 3 47,466 2 31'408 g i neeri ng 4 69,639 -o-4,971* (4) ( 64 ,668) '-"' Non-Departmental -o--o--o--o--o--o- TOTALS -JAO 18 $270,495 7 $ 103, 802 ( 11} $ ( 166, 693) *Does not allow for added personnel needed for revenue program implementation. -10- I I ( I DIR OF FINANCE & SEC TO BOARDS 46 I (56~ ADMIN & FINAN•E'. DEPT ASS'T TO Chlff OF F'ERSOWIEL ~? t (31) :AN fACL FACILITIES SUPERVISO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT PROJECTS FORCE ACCT STRUC- TURES DIGES- TERS GROUNDS I EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE I PROC & . PROP CHIEF 23 I (21 > COLL FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISOR SEWERS PUMP STATION ( . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY ORGANIZATIO~AL CHART JULY, 1978 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 309 (26)). GENERAL MANAGER . 215 I I~!> I MTCE 1 OPER & LABORATORY DEPTS ~ ""' t351 c110> __sITCTJ~ --23 I cm MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS LAB & RESEARCH I - SR FACL SUPV tis I (36) MECH FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISOR r I SHOP & FIXED MOBILE EQUIP EQUIP FACI LI Tl ES SUPERVISOR INSTRU- MENTS ELECT OPER ENGINEER CHIEF OPERATOR TRMT PLANT OPER I l LABORATORY DIRECTOR I I I BACT CHEM INDUST WASTE LAB LAB LAB ; . -( PROPOSED . SPECIAL COMMITTEES . ' I ; CHIEF I GEN'L I ENGINEER · ~OUNSEL I 4'> I r_;71 ENGINEERING DEPT -·---· ····-·-PLANT CQNSTI, "hD!!!ch V'"I 'ryne1er, [ I MARINE ECOLOGY SENIOR ·11 SENIOR CHIEF OF I I ENGINEER ENGl~EER INDUST & PERMIT PERMIT & CONN PLANT CONSTR HAPS & !DRAFTING SENIOR ENGINEER DIST CONS TR ~ I RESCURC: ~:,t,AGEH!' EN~ I NEi. ~ RES : MG.'1T I CENTER OF ORANGE CO UNTY BUDGET RECOMi\nEO\~DATIONS CA PITAL OUTLAY REVOlV~NG FUND JOINT WORUS· CONSTRUC TmN 1978-79 FISCAL YEAR Di st r ic t 2 3 5 6 7 11 TOTALS Equity Pe r cent 9.09 29.82 33.07 6.84 5.84 8.45 6 .89 100 .00 --- $ CAPITAL OUTLAY REVO LVING FUND Schedule A Page 1 5/05/78 SUMMARY OF DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARAT IVE DATA FOR JO I NT WORKS EXPA NSION Fiscal Year 1978 -79 1978-79 Requirements 1977 -78 Compa rat ive Amount Cash Estimated Fede r a l /State Amounts To Be Amount Raised Requirements Carry-Over Participation Raised by Taxes Regui rements By Taxes 2,820,627 $ 1,026,844 $ 1 ,249,511 $ 544,272 $ 2,566 ,564 $ 736 '532 9,253, 146 3,370,531 4 ,099.057 1'783 ,558 8,424,534 2,455,785 10,261,621 3,735 ,004 4,545,802 1,980,815 9,335,524 2,722,579 2, 122,452 760,542 940,226 42 1,684 1 ,900 ,950 551 .391 1,81 2' 152 658,986 802,766 350,400 1,64 7'114 480, 169 2,622 ,035 954,626 I, 161 ,538 505,871 2 ,386 ,058 697,587 2,137,96 7 777,467 947,100 413,400 1,943,256 555 ,957 $31,030,000 $11,284 ,000 $13,746 ,000 $6 ,000 ,000 $28 ,204,000 $8 ,200,000 1976 -77 Comp arative Amount $21,944,000 $7,200,000 1975 -76 Comparative Amo unt $26,033 ,000 $2 ,500,000 1974 -75 Co mparative Amo unt $33,424,600 $2 ,500,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JO I NT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQU I REMENTS F i scal Year 1978-79 A. GR ANT FUN DED PROJE CTS I. 75 MGD Improved Treatment a t P l ant No. 2 a. Con struct i on , Supe r vision & I nspect ion b. Oxygen Generation & Dissolution c. Electr i cal Re li abil i ty d. Op e r at i ons Center e. Majo r F~c i l iti es Less : Defe rred 1979 -80 -81 Budget Al l ocat i o n 2. Soli ds Handlin g Fac ili t i es at Pl ant No. 2 Less: Defe rred 1979-80 Budget Allocation 3. F aci l i ti es Pl an, EI S/E I R 4. Hydraulic Re li ab ility at Plant No . 2 5. Revenue Prog r am (Partia ll y Gr ant Fu nd ed) SUBTOTAL GR ANT FUNDED PROJECTS B. NON-GRANT FUNDED PROJEC TS l. New & Reb udg eted Majo r Projects a . Additi ona l So l ids Dewate ri ng Fac ili t i es b. Additional War ehouse Faci l it i es c. Gas Engin es With Gear Drives at Roth r ock Outfal l Booster Stat i on d. Elli s Avenue Pumping Stat i on e . Hydra uli c Re li ab ili ty at Plant No. l f . Di ges t er Cl ea ning Beds at Plant No . l g . Additi ons to RMC, Personne l, IW Annex , Op erato r s ' Lunch Room h. Refurbi sh Tr i ck I i ng Fi I ters at P l ant No . i. Gas System and Mixing Compressors for Dig esters at Pl ants l & 2 j. So li ds Disposa l & Tran sportation Fa c ilities 2 . New & Rebud geted Minor Projects a . Rec l amat i on P l ant No. l (See Schedu l e C) b. Pl a nt No. 2 (See Schedule D) c . Eq ui pment (See Schedule E) 3. Specia l Projects l. Sol i ds Treatment 2. Ce ntrate Treatmen t 3. Screen i ngs & Scum Di sposa l 4 . Ocean Wa iver App l icat i on SUB-TO TA L NON-GRA NT FUNDED PROJEC TS C. RESERVE FOR FUTURE BUDGET ALLOCAT IONS TO TA L J OI NT WORKS CONSTRUCT ION REQU I REMENTS D. AVA ILABLE FUN DING 1 . Estimated Carry-Ove r from 1977 -78 2. Federa l and State Construction Grants TOTAL AVA IL ABLE FUNDIN G NET AMOU NT TO BE RA I SED BY TAXES FOR CORF s l ,400,000 8 ,360,000 l ,800 ,000 500 ,000 30,300 ,000 $42,360,000 22 ,88 1 ,000 $12,620,000 l l ,600 ,000 $ 500 ,000 150 ,000 600,000 250 ,000 1'100,000 350,000 200 ,000 75 ,000 240,DOO 500 ,000 450,000 4 10,00D 805,000 500,000 200,000 200,000 50 ,000 Sl9 ,479 ,000 l ,020 ,000 700,000 2,000 ,000 25 1 ,ooo $3 ,965 ,000 l ,665 ,000 950,000 $1 l ,284 ,000 l 3 > 7 /16 I 000 Sche dul e B Page 2 5/0li/78 $23 ,1150,000 $ 6,580,000 l,000,000 $3 1 ,030 ,000 525,030,000 s 6,000,000 CAPITAL OU TLAY RE VOLV:N G FUND NEW & REB UDGE TED MI NOR PRO J EC TS -REC LAMA TI ON PLAN T NO. 1 F i sca l Yea r 1978 -79 1. Scum Pum p and a p p urt e n ~nt p i pe fo r cl a rifi e r s 3 & 4 2 . Re mo d e l dig es t e r No. 6 cove r 3. Re mod e l s ludg e s t o r age hoppe r s 4. I mp r o ve grit r emova l a nd h a nd ! i ng f ac i l it i es & headwo rk s 5. Ch e mi c a l f eed pu mp s f o r bo i l e r s 6 . Remode l a n d expand hot wate r l oo p t o uti l i ze engine waste hea t f o r di geste r h eat in g 7. Di ges t e r ho t wa t e r co n tro l s fo r d iges t e r s nos. 5 , 6 , 7 & 8 8. Liquid l eve l a n d ga s p r ess u re sw itch es f o r d i ges t e r s 9. Re turn s lud ge pum ps f o r c l a rifi e r no . 5 (2 r e quir e d ) 10. De n s it y me t e r f o r act i vated s l udge p l a nt 11 . Au tomati c ga t e ope r ators at t ri ck lin g f il ter p ump stat i on 12. Add i t i ona l a u tomat i c gat e ope ne r s at me te ri ng and d i vers i on s t r uc tur e 13. Foam c o n t r o l f o r act i vated s ludge pl a nt (e f f luent channe l s ) 14. Pl ant wa t e r p ump 15 . Sa f e t y s t a irways a n d r emode ling at Shops "A" & 11 B" 16 . Re l oca t e Sh op 11 ~11 a i r comp r esso r 17. Re pl ace ex i st in g a u to shop ve hi c l e ho i st wi t h ho i st wi t h greate r ca p ac ity t o accommodate n ew eq ui pm e n t 18. El e ctrica l k eyed in te rl ocks fo r eme r ge n cy powe r i nterconnec ti ons 19. Co ntro l Cen t e r hea dwo r ks in st ru menta ti o n -r ep l ace and u pgrade 20. Headwo r ks in st rum entat i on an d co n tro l s -r ep l ace a nd u pgrade 21. Lan d sca pin g i mpro v eme n ts 22 . Ca r d -key se cu r i ty f o r cesspoo l trun k d i sposa l area 23 . Mi sce ll aneo u s pav i ng 2 4. Mi sce l l aneo u s sma ll i mprovement proj e cts Sc h e d ul e C Page 3 $ 15,000 2 0 ,000 40 ,0 00 50 ,000 4 ,000 15 ,00 0 8 ,000 9 ,000 25,00 0 3 ,500 25 ,000 25 ,000 1'500 40,000 15 ,00 0 3,00 0 10,000 5 ,000 5,000 10,000 25,000 16 ,0 00 30 ,000 502000 $450,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLV I NG FUND NEW & REBUD GE TED MINOR PROJECTS -TRE ATMEN T PLANT NO . 2 Fi sca l Year -1978 -79 1 . New a i r compres so r 2. Pre -chlorin at i on faci 1 ities 3. Remodel r est r oom facilities and addit i ons to pl ant office 4. Reh ab ilita te in c in e rato r No. 2 5. Reh ab il itat e drive unit for clar ifi e r "K" 6. Chemical f eed p umps for boi l er 7. Heat exchange r and recirculat i o n pump s for digest e rs "A" & "B'' 8. Relocat e modu l ator va l ves for digeste r s "C" & "D" 9. Repl ace gas storage sphe r e pressure tr a n sm it ter 10. Raw s ludge r eco rde r s a nd timers for cl a rifi e rs "A" thru 11 F11 11. Foul a ir sc rubbe r contro l s -r emo del & replace 12. Rep l ace sl udge f l ow recorders for dig ester "D" & "E" 13. ·Landscaping i mprovements 14. Mi sce l l aneoµs pav i ng 15. Mi sce ll a neo us sma ll im p r ovement proj e cts Sch e dule D Page 4 $ 80 ,000 75,000 25,000 30 ,000 2 ,500 5,000 20 ,000 3,000 1 '500 8,000 2 ,000 3,000 25,000 25 ,000 105 !000 $L110,o oo ( Sc hedule E 5/04/78 Page 5 CAPITA L OUTLAY REVOLV I NG FUND EQUIPMENT REQLIREMEN TS 1978 -79 Fiscal Year Col I. Lab & Equipment Total Adm in . Pit. 11tce. Fa e. Mech . Elect . Oper . Res . ~- Trucks & Vehic l es $190,977 $16,245 $12,000 $140,552 s 7,200 $ 8 ,480 $ 6,500 Other Mobile Equipment 102,700 3, 180 38 ,408 41 ,206 8,638 s 8,088 3, 180 Machine Equipment & Too l s 41 ,058 4,954 895 30,242 4,867 100 Comm unications Equipment 16,062 4,200 1 ,500 3,922 4,840 1 ,600 Instrumentation & Test i ng Equipment 103,48 1 10,388 3,429 23,689 65,975 Sa fety & Tra f fic Contro l Equipment 2 ,800 2 ,800 Office Equipme n t & Furniture 347,922 $292,008 928 l ,328 928 3.337 l ,364 10, 729 37 ,300 Totals $805,000 $292,008 $25,307 556,831 $224,816 $31,393 $40,78 1 $88,464 $45 ,400 Rebudgeted Items Inc l ude d in Above (Purchased but not De l ive r ed) $137 ,491 -0-s 7 ,765 $38,408 $ 73. 752 $ 9,478 $ 8,088 -0--o- Net New Funding $667,509 $292 ,008 $17 ,542 $18,423 s 15 1 ,064 $21'915 $32,693 $88 ,464 $45,400 E '>l i matcJ Projl~c t Co ,t C.1rryovc r from Pn.·vlou:, Y"-·,1r Re s e r ve Revenue f cd~ral & Stolle Cr,1n t s Tax Lev y Total Fund s Aval lab le Expend i t urc Grant funded Project s 1. Step 1 Fit c i 1 i t ie'> P1,m, EI S & JPL 5 ,000,000 2. 75 HGD Sc~ondJry Treatment (a) fl ood Ila I I & S i t e Imp . 2,600 .000 (b) Oxygen Equipment 8 ,360 ,000 (c) Elect. Rel iab i Ii ty 3,000,000 (d) Ope ration'> Ccnti:r 1,100,000 (c ) Ha jor Facilities 31 ,000 ,000 ( f) Cons tr. Supr. & l nsp. 1,500 ,000 Sub-Total Sl17. 560 ,000 3 . Addit ional So l ids Faci l ities (a) En g inee ring -Desi gn 600,000 (b) Const rue l ion 11 , 720 ,000 (c) Const r. Su pr. & lnsp . 300,000 Sub-Tota l $12,620,000 4 . SO HGO of Imp ro ved Tr eatment (Pha se II) (a) Engineer i ng -Des ign 2 ,000,000 -(b) Con s truction 47,000,000 (c) Co s ntr. Supr. & ln s p. 1,000,000 Sub-Tota l s50 1 000 1000 5. SO HG O of Improved Treatment (Phase Ill) (a) Eng inee ring -Design 1,7S0,000 (b) Cons truct i on 42,500.000 (c) Cons t. Supr. & lnsp. __ 750,0 00 Sub-Tota l s4s,ooo ,ooo 6. Hydrau li c Re liab ili ty & Additi ona l Ca paci t y (a) Engineering -Des i gn I, 100 ,000 (b) Cons truct i on 21,000,000 (c) Con s tr. Supr . & l nsp . 40 0 ,000 Sub-Tota l ~22,50 0 1 000 7. Sol ids Process ing & Oisp. (a) Engineering -Des i gn 500 ,000 (b) Cons truct i on 9,300 ,000 (c) Con s t r. Supr. t l nsp. 200,000 Sub-Tota l SI0,000 ,000 Total Grant-Funded 51 92 ,6 o .ooo li on -Grant Funded Pro jects Ha jor t Special Pr ojec t s 18 ,415 ,000 Mi nor Projec t s & [qu i pmcnt 9,16 5.000 Total li on-Grant Fu nded 527,580 ,000 -To r.ii Pro jec t Expl·rHJ i tures S220 ,760 ,000 Bn l ance t o Curryovcr t o nex t Fi sea I Ye a r (Ill' 11 1\L OUlll\Y Rt VOLV I tit> FUN D PKftlHIN/\R Y C/\~11 fl Oll l'ROJ[CTIONS r1 SC/\l Yl•\llS l<)/8-/<) HIROU!,11 l 'lll}-811 l)l,pcndcd Thr ouq h 6-J0-/8 1978 -7') 1979-80 S 11 ,28't ,000 $3 3 ,9110 ,000 32 .S50 ,000 . 13. 7116 ,000 18 ,7S2 .ooo 6,000 ,000 ~.000 S63,58o ,ooo S58,692,000 4 ,300,000 70 0,000 2 ,600,000 3,000 ,000 s ~.360,000 l ,200,000 1 ,800 ,000 600,000 500,000 700 ,000 111. 760 ,000 14 ,040,000 100 ,000 600 ,000 700,000 600,000 300,000 3,700 ,000 125,000 l,000 ,000 800 ,000 300,000 700 ,0 00 10,000 500,000 s 9.500,000 523 ,0~0 .ooo $25,1135 ,000 4 ,9 15 ,000 3,500 ,000 I ,665 ,000 ~9QQ. 000 S 6 ,580 ,000 s 5,000 ,000 $ 9 .500 ,000 579 .(,110, 000 s30 ,11 35 ,000 ---------- s33,q110,ooo $78 ,757.000 1980-8 1 $28,257 ,000 30 ,58 5,000 -~o.ooo $64 ,842 ,000 S I ,000,000 l ,500,000 100 ,000 5 ,000,000 125,000 750,000 13,000,000 250,000 1,000 ,000 10,000 ,000 200 ,000 6 ,000,000 125,000 H9 .oso,ooo 2 ,500 ,000 I ,S00 ,000 ~_,_()00 ,000 $113 ,050 ,000 $?I, 792 ,000 1981-8l 1982-83 1983 -811 S2 I, 79 2 ,000 s 13,238,ooo S10 ,S88 ,000 36,066,000 29,565 ,000 17,960 .000 6 ,000 ,000 6 ,000 .000 6.000 .000 S63 ,858 ,000 Sl18 ,803 ,000 S34 ,548 ,000 2 ,720,000 50 ,000 250,000 14 ,000,000 $17,000,000 3,000,000 300 ,000 350,000 10 0,000 500 ,000 2SO,OOO 18 ,000 ,000 13 ,0 00 ,000 11 ,500 ,000 300.000 250 ,000 200,000 7,000 ,000 3,300 ,000 125 ,000 65 ,000 3 ,300,000 75 ,000 rn; ,r;2 D,fi00 SJ~ ,215 ,000 S1l1 ,800 ,00!l 2 ,500 ,000 2 ,500 ,000 2 ,S00 ,000 1,500,000 1 ,500,000 I ,500 ,000 L'!.,_o_oo..!. 00_'2 11. 000 . 000 11 ,000 ,000 S50 ,6W ,OO O s38 ,2 1s,ooo $18,800.000 $13,738 ,000 5 10,588 ,000 515 ,7118 ,000 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JUNE 14) 1978 -7:30 P.M. , .w -. __ ...... Ill \ .JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 WARRANT NO. joINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41580 41581 41582 41583 41584 41585 41586 41587 41588 41589 41590 41591 41592 • 41593 41594 41595 41596 41597 41598 41599 41600 41601 41602 41603 41604 41605 41606 41607 41608 .41609 41610 41611 41612 41613 41614 41615 41616 41617 41618 41619 41620 41621 41622 41623 41624 41625 41626 41627 41628 41629 41630 41631 41632 41633 "A-1" Aladdin Litho and Art, Business Cards .Almquist Tool & Equipment, Tools American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts Aquatic Center, Cylinder Tests Associated ot Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barksdale"Controls Division, Electrical Supplies Beckman Instruments, Electrodes Bessen & Associates, Pump Parts Bird Machine, Equipment Rental Business Publisher, Inc., Subscription CS Company, Freight Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies Cal-State Seal Company, Pump Parts John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Chemical Engineering, Engineering Manual Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline Clark Dye Hardware, Small Hardware William N. Clarke, Travel Expense Reimbursement Coast Nut & Bolt, Small Hardware · College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Barber Coleman, Digester Parts Conunercial Envelope & Printing, Envelopes Compressor Products, Compressor Parts and Repairs Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Control ·specialists, Inc., Pump Parts Costa Mesa· Auto Parts,":"Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County of Orange, Fire Hose Charles P. Crowley Company, Odor Control Parts Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water DME, Inc., Exhaust Assembly Daniels Tire Service, Tires Deco, Electrical Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Documents & Publications, Safety Orders Jim Elo, Employee Mileage Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Lorren Etienne, Travel Expense Reimbursement Fischer & Porter Company, Freigat Fisher Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware City of Fountain Valley, Water Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Fuel Injector Tests Georgia Pacific, Lumber General Telephone Company, Phone Golden State Fish Hatchery, Lab Research Specimens Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Impellers Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hi Flex International, Hardware Honeywell, Inc., Strip Charts Howard Supply Company, Pipe Fittings AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ ~OUNT 14.31 117 .40 1,233.46 18.50 1,161.01 88.34 128.08 513.74 780.12 4,823.00 10.00 38.00 63.65 59.06 885.00 15.00 1,584.08 54.60 166.89 37.10 29.09 26.61 76.85 617.57 422.81 1,873.65 6. 71 190.81 6.00 375.00 124.02 46,00 93.22 326.35 161.65 140.00 115.31 28.02 3,000.00 213.82 23.70 193.60 173.89 450.20 60.00 708.93 249.45 15.00 5,692.50 990.64 1,638.46 109.50 46.11 1,332.54 "A-1" JO.INT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41634 . -).) 41635 41636 41637 41638 41639 41640 41641 41642 41643 41644 41645 41646 41647 41648 41649 41650 41651 . 41652 41653 41654 41655 41656 41657 41658 41659 41660 41661 41662 41663 41664 41665 41666 41667 41668 41669 41670 41671 41672 41673 41674 41675 41676 41677 41678 41679 41680 41681 41682 41683 41684 41685 41686 41687 41688 41689 II A-2" City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment· Rentals Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Flanges King Bearing, Inc., Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Cleaning Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Wire Solder LBWS, Inc., Demurrage · L & G Sporting Goods, Life Jackets L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Rental Lancaster Upholstery, Upholstery Repairs Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Boots Lighting Distributprs, Inc., Lighting Supplies McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Freight Paul A. Mitchell, Travel Expense ~eimbursernent Nalco Chemical Company, Freight · National Chemsearch, Chain Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water M. C. Nottingham Company, Inc., Sewer and Road Repairs Noyes Data Corporation, Publications O'Rings, Inc., O'Rings Oda Nursery, Inc., Plants The Ohmart Corporation, Temperature Controls Orange County Fire Protection, Fire Safety Equipment Orange County Wholesale Electric, Timing Unit Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Pacific Thermal, Temperature Control Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M. C. Patten Corporation, Pressure Gauge Pickwick Paper Products, Cleaning Supplies City of Placentia, Street Repairs Harold Primrose, Sampling Ice Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal The Register, Employment Ads Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Robbins & Meyers, Pump Parts Robertshaw Controls Company, Pressure Gauge Ruffs. Saw Service, Saw Service SBC, Inc., Pump Rental Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Shamrock Supply, Small Tools Shepherd Machinery Company, Tractor Parts Sheraton-Twin Towers, Lodging Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies Solar Turbin· International, Generator Parts Southern California Edison Company, Power South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings, Southern California Water Company, Water Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump Parts Superior Concrete Products, Tubing The Suppliers, Ladder Surveyors Service Company, Drafting Manual TFI Building Materials, Pipe Fittings AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS I f AMOUNT . $ 914. 96\.J J.55·. 55 2.75 74.20 . 423. 04 274.03 114 .17 48.51 76.29 1,303.84 76.50 290.76 44.10 22.19 343.11 18.60 76.86 51.55 120.57 73.20 32.73 3,366.00 : .... 35. 90 •;; :\·.~ ·25. 20 . :;,'".265. 00 40I.44U 111. 86 139.79 54.62 194.92 1,592.83 120.85 537.10 2,738.19 31.80 83.70 501. 21 197.19 2,732.09 247.55 64.67 263.96 1,083.70 89.08 642.64 195.50 245. 01 1,221.98 83,270.43 70.14 6.26u 1, 124 .40 462.37 36.75 22.02 603.98 "A-2" WARRANT NO. 'JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS >../ n("\ 41690 ~hit>. oc 41691 ·41692 41693 41694 41695 41696 41697. 41698 41699 41700 41701 41702 41703 41704 "A-3" Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Lock Service Travel Buffs, A~r fare. Truck Auto Supply Company, Truck Parts Tubesales, Tubing United Parcel Service, UPS VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage Valley Cities Supply Company, Small Hardware Valvate Associates, Valves VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies John R. Waples, Odor Control Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction Everett H. York Company, Engine· Parts Donald Winn, Travel Expense Reimbursement TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 50.88 368.00 308.62 122.59 14.47 174.56 404 .16 354.89 142.01 205.00 594. 71 1,927.36 239.81 345.98 209.75 $144,129.78 "A-3" .JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 .WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 41564 I)~) ;:·. 41565 41566 •41567 41568 41569 41570 41571 41572 41573 41574 41575 41576 41577 41578 41579 II A-4" A & T Construction Company, Inc., Retention J-13-1 Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Heavy·E<{uipment Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Butier Engineering, Inc., Contract Hgmt. P2-23 Eastman, Inc., Office Furniture Fabco, Drapery Installation Howard Supply Company, Cabinet International Business·Machines, IBM Typewriters Johnson Steel Corporation, Retention J-6-lE C. H. Leavell & Company, Contract P2-23-3 Pa~cal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-1 and P2-23-5 Perkin Elmer Corporation, Lab Equipment H. C. Smith ~onstruction Company, Contract P2-23-6 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-1 and P2-.23-.S Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-23-l and P2-23-5 VWR Scientific, Lab Equipment TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT ~ 1, 289. so\...) 3,869.00 5,121.92 i6,304.00 213.41 586.91 237.44 2,.461.32 2,430.00 177,474.38 117,299.84 477. 99 45,606.60 322.50 224 •. 35 194.78 $374, 113. 94 $518,243.72 II A-4" JNDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 9, 1978 ~ WARRANT NO. J)ISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND ,IN FAVOR OF 41559 Local Agency Formation Commission, Annexation 31 TOTAL DISTRIC4 NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 41560 F. B. Cook Corporation, Retention 3-lR-3 TOTAL DISTRICT No.-3 OPERATING FUND· ~ WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 41561 41562 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering 3-22-1 Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERA TING FUND . WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 41563 Dale St. C~rles, Refund Tract 8934 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND "B" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL.DISTRICTS AMOUNT 25.00 $ 25.00 AMOUNT $ 5,364.74 AMOUNT $:.: 3, 867. 06 106,693.48 $110,560.54 $115, 925. 28 AMOUNT $ 532.84 $ 532.84 "B" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41747 . 41748 :}i ! i ? ; 4174 9 41750 41751 ''41752 41753 41754 41755 41756 41757 41758 41759 41760 41761 41762 41763 41764 41765 41766 • 1 41767 41768 41769 41770 41771 41772 41773 41774 41775 41776 41777 41778 41779 41780 41781 41782 41783 . 41784 41785 41786 41787 41788 41789 41790 41791 41792 41793 41794 41795 41796 41797 41798 41799 41800 41801 "C-1" Addison-Wesley Publishing, Engineering Publications Allied Colloids, Polymer Allied Supply Company, Valves Jeff Ambrose, Reimburse Vehicle Damages American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Lock & Supply,·· Inc. , Padlocks Anaheim Builders Supply, Inc., Building Materials Void . Arbor Nursery, Trees Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Hardware John A. Artukovich, Contract 2-5 Emergency Sewer Repairs Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies BC Industrial Supply, Rope Hilary Baker, Employee Mileage Gary Bankston, Reimburse Vehicle Damages Beckman Instruments, Instruction Course Fee Paul Bergeron, Reimburse. Vehicle Damages Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete Mix Bonded Pavers, Asphalt Mix W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage Butier Engineering, Contract Management 2-5 C & R Reconditioning Company, Equipment Repair CS Company, Plug Valve CWPCA, Conference Fee California Fasteners Supply, Small Hardware California Lithograph Corporation, Booklets Bruce Chapman, Reimburse Vehicle Damages Chevron USA, Inc., Engine Oil Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware Coast Communications, Communication Equipment College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Controlco, Valve Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Mr. Crane, Equipment Rental Larry Curti Truck & Equipment, Equipment Rental Curry & Sorensen, Inc., Cement Daily Pilot, Emolovment Ad C. R. Davis Su:rl'ply Company, Poly Sheeting Deco, Electrical Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Donovan Construction, Blower Eastman, ·rnc., Office Supplies Engineers Sales-Service Company, Pump Ensign Products Company, Oil Void Filter Supply Company, Engine Parts Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts Flexible Municipal Sales, Auger John Flores, Reimburse Vehicle Damages Flo-Systems, Pump Parts Foremost Threaded Products, Small Tools Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies and Processing A. F. Frey, Employee Mileage AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 27. 8,.0 29, 640. O..,J l,607.77 179.63 2,554.04 264.53 34.11 .oo 2,510.08 626.85 126,075.62 2,670.45 94.13 17.70 104 .10 300.00 60.00 451.84 3,300.00 20.55 4,814.00 620.00 416.96 100. 00 124.00 ·578.7f. 71.0~ 3,103.37 276.34 82.36 50.76 3,330.93 183.19 218.89 6.00 383.50 70.00 240.70 9.11 531.11 259.30 95:00 53.00 442 .15 2,883.41 586.04 .oo 31.00 5,~03.29 85.58 48.00 s43.9V 24.48 215.46 48.78 "C-1" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41802 41803 41804 41805 41806 41807 41808 41809 41810 41811 41812 41813 41814 41815 41816 41817 41818 41819 41820 41821 41822 41823 •41824 41825 41826 41827 ~ . 41828 41829 41830 41831 41832 41833 41834 41835 41836 41837 41838 41839 41840 41841 41842 41843 41844 41845 41846 41847 41848 41849 41850 41851 41852 41853 41854 41855 41856 41857 "C-2" City of Fullert-0n, Water General Telephone Company, Phone Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal W.W. Grainger, Inc., Small Tool Harbor Radiator, Radiator Repair Charles G. Hardy, Inc., Building Materials Herrnan-Phinney-Kodmur, Pump Parts Hi Flex International, Hose Installation Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Pump Parts Industrial Asphalt, Asphalt Mix Inland Empire Equipment Company, Equipment Parts Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pump Parts Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Small Hardware Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Hardware Gale V.· Kelly, Reimburse Vehicle Damages King Bearing, Inc., Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LA Chemical, Weed Killer LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniform:· Supply Company, Uniform & Towel Rental Laursen Color Lab, Photo Ser.vice Lewco Electric Company, Starter Repair Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Gloves and Raingear Liftco, Equipment Repair Lowry & Associates, 2-5 Emergency Sewer Repair A. J. Lynch Company, Plastic Buckets Master alueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies Metal Finishing, Engineering Magazine Subscription Mine Safety Appliances Company, Hose Motorola, Inc., Communications Repair National Ch~msearch, Odor Control National Lumber Supply, Small Hardware Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Pump Parts Newark Electronics, Electrical ·supplies City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Paper Supplies Orange County Door Closer Service, Door Repair Oreo Tool & Equipment, Hardware Oxygen Service, Demurrage Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauges Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Mower Parts Pennwalt Corporation, Bowl Shell Extension Pickwick Paper Products, Brooms Postmaster, Postage Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Republic Engines, Engine Parts Safety Research Corporation, Paint Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL·DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 24.35 7,672.38 10,708.75 41.45 16.50 141. 72 826.60 23. 71 443.53 416.64 11.25 45.09 50.35 99.77 138.33 40.00 529.68 62.07 264.01 474.35 424 .15 1,292.89 107.02 319.94 486.01 90.00 2,117 .84 205.59 105.94 12.00 18.29 346.94 947.37 63.34 134.32 85.02 10.17 90.04 30.00 70.60 23.40 1,606.96 176.00 1,008.23 358.97 24.33 455.76 72.88 500.00 15.90 42.90 146.81 90.95 444.70 42.35 190.65 "C-2" ' JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID MAY 23,. 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41858 41859 .''q 41860 41861 . 41862 . '' 41863 41864 41865 41866 41867 41868 41869 41870 41871 41872 41873 41874 41875 41876 41877 41878 ·41879 41880 41881 41882 41883 41884 41885 41886 41887 41888 41889 41890 41891 4J892 41893 41894 41895 "C-3" Sears Roebuck and Company, Hardware and Tools Shaw Airmotive, Air Service Shepherd Machinery Company, Pump Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies Smith Electric Motors, Pump and Motor Repair Southern California· Edison Company, Power South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings Southern California Coastal Water Research Project,:Conf. Expense Southern California Gas Company, Gas Southern Counties Oil Company, Diesel Fuel Southwest Plywood and Lumber, Wood Tape Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water C. D. Spracher Company, Inc., Engine Parts Super Chem Corporation, Janitorial Supplies The Suppliers, Rope Slings J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Jean Taisne, Reimburse Vehicle Damage~ Taylor-Dunn, Small Tools Travel Buffs, Air Fare Truck Auto Supply, Inc .• , Truck Parts J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Special Gases Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges U. S. Government, Publications Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Valve and Primer Corporation, Valve Parts VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Vehicle Spring S_ervice, Truck Repair Water Pollution Control Federation, Conference Fee Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Salt Company, Lab Salt Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction George Yardley Associates, Pump Parts TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL· DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 299.41\ SI.CV 195.04 538.77 596.98 56,766.10 421.69 558.50 2,834.22 4,489.41 64.87 . 6.'75 76.94 1,006.47 28.01 594.53 340.00 153.77 777.00 435.87 117.89 14.56 38.49 31.54 20.50 269.01: 463·.~ 274.18 225.11 53.85 262.40 80.00 645.00 126.94 366.12 20.25 2,045.63 163.91 $306,012.40 "C-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 23, 1978 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS , ___ _ 41730 \._I 41731 41732 41733 41734 41735 41736 41737 41738 41739 41740 41741 41742 41743 41744 41745 41746 . "C-4" John Carollo Engineers, Engincer_ing Services Daily Pilot, Legal Ad A-089 and A-091 Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment City of Fountain Valley, Plan Check Fee J-13-2 Global Engineering, P2-23-6 Specs Refund Howard Supply Company, Pipe Threader Jet Line Engineering, Power Control Unit C. H. Leavell & Company, P2-23-3 Stop Notice Release Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-l · Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Lawnmower Production Steel Company, Inc., Digester Hanger The Register, Legal Ads E-093, PW-066, and J-13-2 Santa Ana Dodge, Dodge Pick-Ups Skipper and Company, Stop Notice Release PW-055 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-3 The Suppliers, Tool Box Western Wholesale Company, Vacuum and Edger TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 327.50 20.84 144.12 100.00 3.71 1,507.59 215.00 4,108.20 19,537.36 772753 17,455.00 257.00 13,882.77 11,893.75 310.83 365.57 484.95 $ 71,386.72 $ 377,399.12 "C-4" ~ ... ( l 1lNDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAIU MAY 23, 1978 . , WARRANT NO. D•ISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OlITLAY IN FAVOR OF 41713 41714 4.1715 41716 John A. Artukovich & Sons, Contract 2-5R Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe, Permit 2-19-2 Lowry & Associates, Emergency Repair 2-5R Th~ Register, Legal Ads 2-19 and 2-20 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACClP.1lJLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 41717 41718 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Tests 3-22 The Register, .Legal 3-13-1 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 41719 41720 State of California, Annex _66 Processing Fee Clifford A. Forkert, Aerial Haps TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO .. 7 FIXED.OBLIGATION IN FAYOR OF 41721 41722 41723 41724 41725 41726 41727 41728 "D-1" City of Anaheim, 27th JOS Payment City of Buena Park, 27th JOS Payment City of Fullerton, 27th JOS Payment Garden Grove Sanitary District, 27th JOS Payment City of LaHabra, 27th JOS Payment City of Orange, 27th JOS Payment City of Placentia, 27th JOS Payment City of Santa Ana, 27th JOS Payment TOTAL DISTRICT NO, F/O .AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ $ $ Af10UNT 5,600.00 112. 90 S,712.90 AMOUNT 95.00 3,082.20 3,177.20 AMOUNT 1,952.25 120.87 1,,952.25 302.25 483.62 1,,843.38 302.25 5,,543.13 12,,500.00 "D-1" ~ .INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID HAY 23, 1978 ·WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 FACILITIES REVOLVING IN FAVOR OF 41729 The Koll Company, Refund Permit Overpayment TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS !MOUNT 35.00 $ 35.00 15, 712.20 "D-2" JOINT OPERATING CtAIMS PAID JUNE 6, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATINr; FUND WARRANTS .41923 41924 41925 . 41926 .41927 ·_ 41928 41929 41930 41931 41932 41933 41934 41~35 41936 41937 41938 41939 41940 41941 41942 41943 41944 41945 41946 41947 41948 41949 41950 41951 41952 41953 41954 41955 41956 41957 41958 41~59 41960 41961 41962 41963 41964 41965 41966 41967 41968 41969 41970 41971 41972 41973 41974 41975 41976 41977 41978 Air California, Air Fare .Almquist Tool & Equipment, Small Tools Aljac Supply Company, Hardware American Lock & Supply, Inc., Padlocks The Anchor Packing Company, Packing r1aterials Anixter Pruzan; Electrical Supplies Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies BC Industrial Supply, Nylon Rope Baker Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental Beckman Instruments, Buffer Blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt Materials CS Company, Freight Charges Cal-Glass f.or Research, Inc., Lab Supplies Calif. Assoc. of San. Agencies, CASA Conference Fee Calif. Cities Water Company, Water Cal State University, Fullerton, Training Fee John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Compressor Products, Engine Valve Repair and Hardware Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Controlco, Valve Parts Control Specialists, Inc., Pump Parts Cooper Energy Services, Engine Tests Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa •1esa County Water District, Water Culligan Deionized ~fater Service, Lab Water Deco, Electrical Supplies De Guelle & Sons Glass Company, Glass Derby's Topsoil, Sand & Gravel Dickson Appliance-and Air Conditioning, Air Conditioning Repair Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Ecco Equipment Corporation, Equipment Rental Eureka Bearing Supply, r,askets Monica Farris, Employee Mileage Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts Foremost Threaded Products, Hardware The Foxboro Company, Digester Temperature Controls General Telephone Company, Phone Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Harbor Radiator, Radiator Repair Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hewlett Packard, Lab Supplies Hines Wholesale Nurseries, Plants Honeywell, Inc., Temperature Controls City of Huntington Beach, Water ICN Life Sciences Group, Water Sampling Industrial Asphalt, Paving Mix Irvine Ranch Water District, Water King Bearing, Inc., Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Vinyl Hose and Tank Sprayer LBl'lS, Inc., Demurrage L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform and Towel Rental Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS Af10UNT $ 37.7. 70 27.35 266.59V 108.92 204.76 47.69 1,-472 .18 387.64 98.75 77.40 11.52 17.88 84.21 50.00 20.95 40.00 210.00 3,310.02 387.67 667.82 73.78 6,037.31 22.51 7.87 662.50 103.02 246.82 46.ooV 921.94 17.04 360.40 97.50 570.62 2,164.00 169.64 10.80 742.30 141.85 3,228.00 191.90 6,170.10. 100.96 1,720.00 505.71 42.40 56.35 8.82 20.00 11.07 2.75 186.06 360.96. ' 584. 70 v 350.59 1,203.10 175.49 "E-1" JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID JUNE 6, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT --~ ~ 41979 41980 Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing $ 238.03 159.32 26.82 2,061. 70 , 1 ·~ 41981 'r:. 41982 41983 41984 41985 41986 41987 41988 41989 41990 41991 41992 41993 41994 41995 41996 41997 41998 41999 42000 42001 42002 42003 ~ 42004 ' --"' 42005 42006 42007 42008 42009 42010 42011 42012 42013 42014 42015 42016 42017 42018 42019 42020 42021 42022 42023 42024 42025 42026 42027 42028 42029 ~ 42030 42031 42032 "E-2" Lifecom-Safcty Service Supply, Rain Gear A. J. Lynch Company, Freight Charges Martec Reproductions, Inc., Printing Charles Meriam Comp;my, Instrumentation Supplies Hine Safety Appliances Company, Safety Equipment Montgomery Brothers, Heater E~ B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers Motorola, Inc., Communications Equipment National Safety Council, Safety Conference Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water The 0 0hmart Corporation, Cell Repair Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Hardware Pacific Scientific Company, Safety Equipment Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Pacific Thermal Sales, Inc., Caustic Tank M. C. Patten Corporation, Testing Equipment Pearsons Lawnmower Center, Mower Parts Pickwick Paper Products, Painting Supplies Porter. Boiler Service, Inc., Gasket Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Printec Corporation, Engineering Supplies The Pryor Giggey Company, Building Materials The Register, Employment Ad· Robbins ft Myers, Pump Parts Rucker Company, Clyinder Parts Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Small Tools Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies Southern California Edison, Power South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings Southern California Water Company, Water Stang Hydronics, Inc., Freight Charges Starow Steel, Steel Sunshine Tree Farms, Trees The Suppliers, Hardware TFI Building Materials, Pipe Fittings TIS Tropical Fish, Specimen Food Taylor Instrument Company, Testing Equipment Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts U. S. Divers Company, Safety Equipment Repairs United Parcel Service, Delivery Charges USC School of Public Administration, Management Training Seminar Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Electronic Corporation, Transformer Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Fees Worthington Service Corporation, Pump Parts James Wybenga, Employee Mileage George Yardley Associates, Gauge James B. Sharp, Travel Expense Donald Winn, Travel Expense TOTA~ JOINT OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS 85.36 216.24 SOI.62 441.86 20.57 120.00 17.74 5.39 41.09 65.82 44.53 160.30 166.79 88.11 28.52 50.18 71.26 15.90 390.50 546.54 179.19 2,066.20 454.35 477.59 32.75 261.34 43,,852.35 82.58 6.00 42.89 1,890.34 51.41 1,,115.48 122.83 37.10 498.69 658.32 271.35 43.83 650.00 779.85 263.59 1,279.38 43.13 4,148.50 11,641. 70 16.80 358.08 193.77 299.90 $ 112,867.39 "I=-?" DOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 6, 19~8 • WARRANT NO. ·CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 41912 41913 41914 41915 .. 41916 41917 41918 41919 41920 41921 41922 "E-3" John Carollo Engineers; Pl-16 Instruction Program $ John Carollo Engineers/Greeley Hansen, P2-23 Constrµction Serv. J.B. Gilbert & Associates, Engr. Services Waiver Application Hallmark Business I.nteriors, IW Partitions LBWS, Inc~, Jib Crane C. H. Leavell & Company, Contract P2-~3;3 James M. Montgomery, Engineering I-IR Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Testing Equipment H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2-23-6 Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-3, P2-23-5 1,611.65 26,495.66 3,271.63 2,262.19 445.20 269,206.60 2,775.00 231,155.35 491.84 266.,589.90 227.19 TOTAL CORF $ 804.,532.21 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 917,399.60 AGEr~DA I TE~i #8 -.l\LL DISTRICTS "E-3" .41905 41906 41907 'INDIVIOUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 6, 1978 ·DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUt.1ULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contract 2-5R Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-19, 2-20 The Register, Legal Ad 2-19 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 4k908 41909 41910 Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing 3-22-1 Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., Contract 3-22-1 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING : 3-20-3 WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 41911 City of La Habra, 9/74 Permit Refund TOTAL DISTRICT N0 •. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 "F" AGEND.~ ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 49,698.00 227.08 122.71 50,047.79 AMOUNT 242,446.22 4,252.50 299,268.00 545,966.72 AMOUNT 237.50 237.50 546,204.22 "F" "G" RESOLUTION NO. 78-104 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, .JOB NO. PW-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-062 * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 .of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, . specifications and contract documents · this day submitted to the Boards of Directors.by the Districts' Chief Engineer, for MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-062, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. Th.at the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boardsand the Districts' Chief Engineer . be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of.Directors.· PASSED AND ADOPTED at a re~ular meeting held June 14, 1978. . ~ AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" I~ "H" RESOLUTION NO. 78-105 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS.NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 .OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, .AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: ~ Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to PRODUCTION STEEL CO., INC. for MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No~ PW-066 be awarded to Production Steel.Co., Inc. in the total amount of $16,135.00, in accordance with the terms of.their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work ,, pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "H" . . . . June 1, 1978 11:00 A.M. • -.... u • ' JOB NO. PW-066 . PROJECT TITLE MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER AT OUTLET PORT A~ RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Fabrication and installation of modified sludge hopper outlet port close-out assembly. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 20,000.00 REMARKS BUDGET. ·AMOUNT ·$ -------_____________________________________ .;._ __________ ___ C0NTRACTOR : 1. Produc"tion Steel Co., Inc. Gardena, CA 2. Instrumentation and Mechanical Systems,·. Inc. · Fullerton, CA .3. .· 4. TOTAL BID . $16,135.00 $16,854.00 I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to Production Steel Co., Inc. of Gardena, CA for the bid price of $16,135.00, as the lowest an~ best bid. ···~~· .. ··~ --~.;..:-_;;;_~::::;......-~~-4--~-=-.;._-~ Donald Bogart Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation • Engineer II I II AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II . ~. B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N May 30, 197~ 11:00 a.rn. SHEET JOB NO. E-093 . PROJECT TITLE Acquisition of Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist at Treatment Plant #2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of 1 Two-Ton Motor Driven Hoist, 1 Cable Reel; 1 Pendant Control Station; all hoist accessories specified.· ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $6,000.00 BUDGE~ AMOUNT $~~~~~~ . 1. 2. . 3. 4. C0NTRACTOR Jame~ P. Kinney Co • Los Angeles, CA McLaughl~n Indus~ •. Distr. Inc. Pico Rivera, CA E. A. Key Co • Los Angeles, CA .· TOTAL BID $5,950.55* $6,058.74* $8,194.86 5. *Total bid price includes all applicable sales taxes and freight costs to Districts. I have reviewed the bids received and recommend award to James P. Kinney Company of Los Angeles, CA for the bid price of $5,950.55, as the lowest and best bid. c-----....... < . \ _). -------~ 0-~ \ s_~-c"~~ ·-- Donald Bogart "' Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation. ~ ·~Aa~h~ William N. Clarke, Superintendent II J" • AGENDA .ITEM #9(1) -ALL DISTRICTS II J" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, .CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO .• __ C_-_06_-_1_0_73_-_1_4_0 ___ _ C .O. NO. 2 ------,.--------- H. C. Smith Construction Co. DAr£ May 30, 1978 ---------------~------- JOB: MAJOR FACILITIES -75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 -Job No. P2-23-6 . $ 0.00 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) -------~----~~-- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addition~ to ~r deductions from the contract price are hereby app~oved. The contractor has requested time extensions because o.f inclement weather and resulting unfavorable site conditions which delayed the installation of the deep well dewatering system and sheet piling alqng the 84" RCP effluent line. The equipment required to install the above systems could not function under the unfavorable mud and unstable work areas. The contractor commenced operations as soon as the areas could sustain the ne.cessary equipment. 12-29-77 to 1-22-78 1-23-78 to 2-19-78 2-20-78 to 3-19-78 25 calendar days 28 calendar days 28. calendar days Total time extension this change order -81 calendar days Contract Time Adjustments Original contract date Original contract time Original completion date Time extension this C.O. Total time extension Revised contract time Revised completion date December 29, 1977 1000 calendar days September 23, 1980 81 calendar days 81 calendar days 1081 calendar days December 13, 1980 , Original Contract Price $ 30,670,000.00 Board authorization date: June 14, 1978 •By ____________________________ ~~-- Contractor Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 30,670,000.00 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By __ ~----------------~----~---- Chief Engineer "K" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -ALL DISTRICTS "K" "L'' RESOLUTION NO. 78-111-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 2-6R A RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY . SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA-, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLIVE SUB-TRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 2-6R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lowry and Associates for engineering services re preparation of plans and specifications for the Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing Contract . ' No. 2-6R. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE·AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated , by and ---------------------~- between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Lowry and Associates for engineering services in connection with preparation of plans and specifications for Olive Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-6R, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement for a lump sum fee not to exceed $8,400.00; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(L) -DISTRICT 2 "L" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A ______________ __ C.O. N0. ____ 1 __________ ~--~ CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. DATE _________ J_u_n_e __ S~,---1_9_7_8 ______ __ JOB: Orange Sub-Trunk, Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR . Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~~~~~ $ 3,380.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct -and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following .additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contractor to replace asphalt bike.trail damaged under emergency temporary bypass work. 5,200 sq. ft. @ $.65 TOTAL ADD . $3,380.00 $3,380.00 The Contractor is hereby granted a time extension of 6. calendar days for the above work. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time R~vised Completion Date · April 18, 1978 30 Calendar Days May 17, 1978 6 Calendar Days 6 Calendar Days 36 Calendar Days May 23, 1978 .. ~. Original Contract Price $ __ 2_?_6_,_1_0_0_._o_o __ _ Prev. Auth. Changes $ _____ o_. _o_o __ _ This Change (ADD) ef>l:~tlt<"f{) $ __ 3_,_3_8_o_.o_o __ _ Amended Contract Price $ 279,480.00 Board authorization date: June 14, 1978 Approved: COUHTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California ·JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. •By ______________________________ _ By------------------------~---- Contractor Chief Engineer "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(M) -DISTRICT.2 "M" ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_A ______________ __ C.O. N0. _____ 2 ________________ _ CONTRACTOR: JOHN A. 1\RTUKOVICII SONS, INC. DATE _________ J_u_n_e __ s_, __ 1_9_7_8 ______ __ JOB: Orange Sub-Trunk, Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR . Amount of this Change Order (ADD) toxm:ma>) $ 2,300.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions·· to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approv~d. . . Dismantle manholes and fill with d~illing mud the existing sewer and temporary bypass to 1essen future liabilities of the abandoned temporary crossing. ~OTAL ADD The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of time .of 9 calendar days to perform the above work. $2,300.00 $2,.300.00 , ·SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME .original Contract Date Original Contract Time ·original Completion Date April 18, 1978 30 Calendar D~ys May 17, 1978 ·. Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension 9 Calendar Days 15 Calendar Days 45 Calendar Days June 1, 19 7.s Revised Contract Time ·R~vised Completion Date Original Contract Price $ 276,100.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 3, 380 • 00 This Change (ADD) eb"f{jij~~ $ 2,300.00 Amended Contract Price .$ 281,780.00 Board authorization date: June 14, 1978 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. ~ •By ------------------------~-----Contractor By _____________________ ~--------- Chief Engineer "N" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT ·2 "N" "O" RESOLUTION NO. 78-112-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-SR AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF nm BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ORANGE SUB-TRUNK SANTA.ANA RIVER CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 2-SR, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 11ie Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, . DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, on the 1st of June, 1978; and, Section 2. That by letter, Lowry and Associates,-District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said ~ engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa .·Ana River Crossi~g, Contract No. 2-SR, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 18th of April, 1978; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Ora~ge Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, Contract No. 2-SR, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(o) --DISTRICT 2 "0" -... "EXHIBIT A" PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: To: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. ~ P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection - Example: in the.city of Orange, ne~r the intersecti?n of Chapman~ Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) . . . A-f,ui_ . ~ 0:1.. ~~,.._ ~ e~ and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation p~oc~dures, be annexed to the District. The following information is als.o submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: Gross Acreage: Assessed Value Property Owner (If more than one, ·attach sep~rate listing) Name: ~~~~~--~ Address: ___Q__ _ ~ ~ tBJz. er-- City & State: ~&~I ~&'O 7·- Telephone No.: 9 9 (I-? 0 0 9 //~ '?-~--~' t~ ~ (to nearest hundredth) (It more than one parcel, attach separate listing) 28'; ,5{)6 Number of Registered Voters: Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Conunission (and an Environmental Impact Report if prepared). Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. Signature of Property Owner(s) ~~)n-~ r . "P" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -DISTRICT 2 "P" Board of Directors County Sanitation Distr"ict No. 2 P.O. Box 8i27 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Honorable Members: LANO PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING May 3, 1978 JN 7770-101 Tract No. 10011 It is hereby directed that the territory generally described as: within the City of Yorba Linda, Northerly of the (future) intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Village Center Drive and nnre particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed here\vith which has been prepared in accordance with r-"".. the District's Annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. 'Ihe following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: Property Ovvners: Nanes: Wannington Developrrent, Inc. 1641 Langley Avenue Irvine, California 92714 (714) 557-5511 Gross Acreage: Assessed Value: Nunber of Registered Voters: 165.676 Acres $362,750 (1977-1978) N:me 'lhe Baldwin Company 16841 Hale Avenue Irvine, California 92714 (714) 540-8300 Also enclosed is the initial study fonn required by the local agency fonnation conmission. Also a check in the rurount of $.500.00 representing the district's processing fee is included herewith. '!HE BALDWIN cx:MPANY ~/L~ ,~vi.Fr~ I v '-- 17752 SKYPAAK BOULEVARD. SUITE 150, IAVINE. CALIFORNIA 92714 C714l 751-2880 "Q" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) -DISTRICT 2 "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 78-116-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTI.UNSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13~1 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1, AND APPROVING SAID PROJECT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The aoard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, for construction of WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES, WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1, are hereby ~ approved and adopted; and, "R" Section 2. That said project is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines ·Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be·aut~orized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ACOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -DISTRICT 3 "R" Date: To: "EXIIIBI'l' 1\" PE'l'I'l'ION FOR J\NNEXATION Board of Directors County Sanitation District No • .J_ P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 ·• It is hereby requested that the territory generally described as (indicate area description and/or adjacent street intersection - Example: in the city of Orange, near the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard) in the City o~ Orange at the Northwest corner o~ Kennymead Street and Randall Street. and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: . ·~· .. : ... :·>:::'!·:-: Property Owner (If more .than one, attach sep~rate listing) Name: Edgewater Development Company Address: 16592 Hale Ave .. City & State: _I=r~v~i=·n~e~1 _C~a==l~i~~~-~~~~----~~~~~--~----~--~ Telephone No.: (714) 549-8869 Gross Acreage: 5. 60 Acres· (to nearest hundredth) Assessed Value (If more than one parcel, attach separate listing) Number of Registered Voters: o ------- Also enclosed is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report if prepared). Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the District's processing fee is included herewith. Signature of Property Owner(s) EDGENATER DEYELOPMENT COMPANY Ronald P. Merickel "S" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) -DISTRICT 7 "S II. <EXCERPTED FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS> 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION -A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra- tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the ~regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare . a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. "T" AGENDA ITEM #14 -ALL DISTRICTS "T" "U-1" COUNTY SANITATION DJ~TRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNiA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ....._ (714) 540·2910 I ' June 7, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts FROM: General Counsel (714) 962·2411 RE: Proposed Procedures and Actions re Self-Insurance - Workers' Compensation Upon the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee, the Joint Boards have approved implementation of a program of self-insurance for workers' compensation and primary liability coverage. Towards that end, the staff has requested proposals from administrators, and we have prepared procedures for operating under this new system. A resolution has been submitted for your consideration authorizing the detailed procedures for administering and settling liability claims. This includes P.rescribed limits to settle without Board approval. All settlements over $5,000 will be submitted to the Boards. The resolution re workers' compensation submitted for the Directors consideration authorizes (1) the termination of present coverage with the State Fund; (2) the General Manager to retain the services of an administrator; (3) to obtain "excess" coverage over the $100,000.00 per claim of self- insurance and (4) the establishment of reserve and trust accounts to fund the program. The practical operation of the workers' compensation program differs from public liability and, therefore, no resolution is offered to authorize settle- ments, within prescribed limits on these claims. The main reason for that is the fact that there is rarely a compromise settlement; but rather, after an investigation and evaluation of medical records, a value is established per adopted tables and schedules. Awards are calculated and ordered.per those schedules. AGENDA ITEM #15(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" ,. . . .. "U-2" Joint Boards ot Directors Page Two June 7, 1978 With both the workers' compensation and liability claims administration, a close working relationship on· each claim file will be required of our administrators so as to insure full information to the Districts staff and my office. I should note that the legal services attendant to the compensa- tion will largely be handled by a law firm other than mine in order to utilize specialists in the field. However, I will want to approve any counsel selected by our administrator in order to insure the highest level of quality service is obtained. • TLW: jc Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #15(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" "V-1" RESOLUTION NO. 78-107 ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, ·ADOPTING SETTLEMENT PRO- CEDURES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, claims for damages alleging personal injuries, including death, and to real and personal property, made against the Districts have. formerly been processed by a liability insurance carrier of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the liability insurance presently in force on behalf of the Districts provides for a substantial measure of self-insured liability; and, WHEREAS, the District has the primary obligation to process claims and to provide legal defense for claims . in matters of litigation filed against it; anp, WHEREAS, the District has the need for the retention of ajusting services and legal counsel who shall be vested · with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against th~ District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. li 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: AGENDA ITEM #15(B) ~ ALL DISTRICTS "V-1" Section 1: A liability reserve is hereby established ,~ in the amount of $500,000.00 for the payment of claims made against the District. Said 'amount shall be provided for in the 1978-79 annual budget to insure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts not covered ·by liability insurance. Section 2: Each subsequent annual budget shall provide for sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and pa~ent of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 3: A claims investigation and adjustment firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby 9ranted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the District in an amount·not to exceed $1,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an· agreement approved by the General Counsel. Section 4: A committee comprised of the General Mange~, Finance Director and General Counsel are authorized to·review and make full settlement of any claims made against the· District for liability damages ·not otherwise covered by in- surance by payment of a sum not to exceed $5,000.00 per claimant. "V-2"· In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than ·the District's General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the -2- AGENDA ITEM #15(B) ~ ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" ·District's legal counsel within the same limits. Section 5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding $5,000.00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors of the defendant District or the Joint Boards in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of additional legal counsel for purposes of representing the District in the defense of any matters of litigation, wh~rein he determines that specialized expertise or experience are desirable or that the workload· requires the utilization of outside counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. . .. -3- "V-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(s) ~ ALL DISTRICTS "V-3" .~ LOS.~NOELES OF'F'IC:I!: . 12131 382•t!U•I OXNARD OF'F'ICE 18051 '485. 6"443 12131 883•7860 CARL WARREN & CO. · INSURANCE ADJUSTERS 1505 EAST 17"'.M STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 17141 547-5571 12131 924•77151 May 3, 1978 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary Dear Mr. Sylvester: SANTA ANA Of'f"ICE 171 ... ) &47·5571 12131 92"4•7761 SANTA BARBARA OFF'ICE (8051 68'7 ·2694 SAN DIEGO Of"f'ICE l7MI 2e3-eo21 We wish to thank you for your request for a quotation on claim administration and adjusting for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. We wish to submit a bid for $100.00 per month for claims admini- stration on liability claims. This would include the handling of property damage and bodily injury claims. This fee will also include our computer print-out which will give claims statistics and loss control data every 30 days. In addition toibe above services, we would have available our field adjusters for the investigatio~ and handling of any claims involvling serious potential. The cost of these services are as follows: Adjuster's Services Photographs Transportation Photocopies Secretarial Office Expense 10% of $16.50 per hour 1.00 each .20 per mile ·.15 per page 1.50 per page adjuster's services plus $7.00 file makeup. A copy of one of our bills is attached for your information. As a courtesy to the entity, we will provide quarterly billings for all field services. LOS ANGELES OFFICE SERVES LOS ANGELES COUNTY OXNARD OFFICE SERVES VENTURA ANO KERN COUNTIES SAN DIEGO OFFICE SERVES SAN DIEGO AND lMPERiAL COUNTIES SANTA ANA OFFICE SERVES ORANGE, RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES SANTA BARBARA OFFICE SERVES SANTA BARBARA AND SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTIES "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #15Cc> -ALL DISTRICTS "W--1" -2- This will provide exact figures for incurred expenses and assist in budgetary projections. If you have any questions concerning our claims administration services, please feel free to contact us. We are enclosing for your perusal a copy of a specimen contract. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & CO. ~ _j ~'ciJ___ Roy S. George· Assistant Vice President RSG:sb Encl: Specimen contract "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(c) -ALL DISTRICTS ,..\ "W-2" .· RESOLUTION NO. 78-108 ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF LEGAL SELF-INSURANCE BY THE DISTRICTS RE WORKERS' COMPENSATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF LEGAL SELF- INSURANCE BY THE DISTRICTS RE WORKERS' COMPEN- SATION AND AUTHORIZING NECESSARY ACTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Fiscal Policy Conunittee and the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors have made studies relating to the feasibility of being legally self-insured for workers' compensation; and, WHEREAS, it has been recommended that the Districts be legally self-insured for workers' compensation for the reasons that significant cost savings will likely be realized, better safety programs will be established for the benefit of District employees and a higher level of service of compensation claims can be expected; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 approved implementation of said self-insurance program; and, ·WHEREAS, it has been further recommended that at such time as the Districts become legally self-insured, that the services of an administrator be retained to be responsible for all aspects of claims processing and coordination with Districts staff and legal counsel: NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. The nonrenewal of the existing agreement between the Districts and the State Compensation Insurance Fund for the Fund to provide primary workers' compensation insurance coverage is approved effective July 1, 1978, or as soon, thereafter, as the self-insurance program can be fully implemented; and, Section 2. The General Manager is authorized to execute a workers' compensa- tion administrative services agreement effective July 1, 1978, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, "X-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(E) -ALL DISTRICTS ''X-1" Section 3. The General Manager is authorized to obtain a re-insurance policy, in the amount above the level of self-insurance, so as to provide coverage for extraordinary compensation claims, from the State Compensation Insurance Fund or any other qualified private carrier. Said policy to be effective July 1, 1978, or upon implementation of the self-insurance program; and, Section 4. A Workers' Compensation Reserve Account is hereby established in the amount of $500,000.00, as previously authorized by Board action estab- lishing a reserve account for public liability expenses and claim losses. It is the intent of the Districts that the total reserve of $500,000.00 shall be provided to fund both workers' compensation and public liability expenses and claim losses; and, Section S. A Workers' Compensation Trust Account is hereby established to provide funds that may be disbursed by the Districts' Claims Administrator as payment of expenses and claims; and, Section 6. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to open a commercial bank checking account for said Workers' Compensation Trust Account in an amount appropriate to accommodate efficient processing of workers' compensa- tion claims; and provide for drawing of checks ag~inst said account by the Districts' Claims Administrator; and, Section 7. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to draw warrants for the initial deposit of funds in said Workers' Compensation Trust Account and to reimburse said account for authorized expenditures therefrom;: and, the County Auditor -Controller and County Treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to issue and pay said warrants. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "X-2" .. · "Y-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 June 7, 1978 (71.C) 962-2.CI 1 S T A F F REPORT STATUS REPORT ON SOLIDS PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES As a result of the restraints associated with the processing and disposal of sludge in the operation of Goldenwest Fertilizer Company for the long range solids disposal needs of the Districts, the staff has been actively engaged in pursuing alternate dis- posal sites. Discussions have been held with the staff of LA/OMA, representatives from the Irvine ~anch Water District, The Irvine Company, County Solid Waste Division and Commanding General and his staff of the El Toro Marine Cor?S Air Station. Several proposed sites £or processing and disposal of sewage solids have been investigated which are described as follows: 1. Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill The County Solid Waste Management Division will phase out the solid waste landfill operation at this facil- ity in July, 1981. Discussions have been held with the County as to the feasibility 0£ the Districts' processing the sludge at this site and blending it with the solid waste material, incorporating the composted sludge with the "topping" material, or recycling it after composting the material. It is proposed that the private contractor "Goldenwest Fertilizer, Inc." would truck the material to the landfill site and the composting operation would be conducted with Districts' personnel. This operation ~ould terminate with the vacation, by the County, of the sanitary landfill. 2. The Irvine Company Property Adjacent to 405 Freeway and Laguna Canyon Road Representatives of The Irvine Company have indicated the possibility of a short-term lease (3 to 5 years) for composting operations on vacant land on the Company's property adjacent to the area where the Irvine Ranch Water District is disposing of their sludge. This site is only temporary and would not provide ultimate disposal. All material processed at this site would have to be removed for recycling purposes. AGENDA ITEM #16(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Y-1" "Y-2" Staff Report June 7, 1978 Page Two 3. El Toro Uarine Corps Air Static~ Site Discussions were held with Major General Joseph Kaler regarding the feasibility of a remote canyon located on the military reservation. The site a~peared to be the only area available which would have a minimum of nuisance impacts on the Air Station's operations, as well as the adjacent residential developMents. The particular area examined is the area set aside by the Air Station for the ammunition bunkers and the making up of bombs. This area does not appear to be a viable alternative for the Districts. 4. Bee and Round Canyon So.lid Di·soosaT Sites The County Solid Waste Division is presently pursuing the feasibility of solid waste disposal sites in Bee and Round Canyons, located on The Irvine Company property, which are planned to commence operation with the cessation of operation at Los Coyotes Sanitary Landfill. Based on the projections prepared by the County, these Canyons should be adequate to serve the solid waste disposal problem for a portion of the County until after the year 2000.. Since the Districts' volume of sludge is very minor in compari- son to the volumes processed by the County in the solid waste disposal prograc, it may be feasible to incorporate the Districts' solids ~rocessing and ultimate disposal program with the County at these two sanitary landfill sites. Since the Districts will be engaged in conposting operations, it is the staff's recommendation that the Districts proceed, as soon as possible, to procure the necessary equipment for this operation. Composting operations consist of a windrow I!&ethod by applying approximately seven cubic yards per acre per day. This figure ~s based upon the history of the Districts' recent operation at Plant No. 2 and would provide for a relatively nuisance free operation. To be successful in a windrow operation, which must be conducted on a seven day per week basis, will require approxi- mately five full time employees on a staggered work-shift, with the following equipment: · EQUIPMENT RANGE OF USEC EQUIPMENT NEW EQUIPHENT Rototiller $25,000 to $ 55,000 $ 90,000 Blade 25,000 to 40,000 65,000 Water Truck 15,000 to 25,000 35,000 Dump Truck (2) 20,000 to 20,000 25,000 Loader Conveyor 12,000 to 15,000 20,000 $97,000 to $155,000 $235,000 AGENDA ITEM #16(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Y-2" Staff Report June 7, 1978 ~ Page Three nr.~' • ·~ "Y-3" It is, therefore, recommended that the Districts proceed as soon as possible to·~ procure the necessary equipment to perforra composting operations at the selected site. Since the procurement of the rototiller is essential to the operation, purchase of this equipment should be done immediately. Delivery of new equipment will range from six to nine months. Staff has located a used rototiller which can be procured within the next sixty days. The balance of the . equipment is not as critical as far as delivery times are concerned • REL:hjb AGENDA ITEM #16(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "Y-3" -·~ • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 14, 1978 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Item No~ 1 (a_) TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Last Thursday, June 8th, the General Manager and I appeared on behalf of the Districts at EPA's West. Coast·hearing on their secondary treatment waiver regulations. If EPA ignores the testimony as they did following their public meeting. on.the· same subject in February, no one will be able to receive a waiver because of EPA's harsh interpretation of the Amend- ment to the Act. Just prior to last Thursday's hearing, representatives of the major West Coast dischargers met to discuss what action should be taken to insure that EPA's regulations are fair. We concluded that the decisions are political rather than technical . . ~h~refo~e, I have written the enclosed letter to Senator Cranston. As·C:Senate Democratic Whip, he can exert conside·rable influence on Senator Muskie who is Chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution, and officials at EPA. I am asking each Director to have his Mayor write or call Senator Cranston within the next 10 days, expressing concern that unless EPA's proposed regulations for secondary treatment waivers are changed before final adoption,.a $1/2 billion .in wasteful construction will be required in California. Incidentally, the State Water Resources Control Board supports our position. Attached is a copy of my testimony on the subject, and AMSA's statement which was presented by our General Manager .. Senator Alan Cranston Donald J. Saltarelli Joint Chairman 229 Russell Senate Office Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-3553 • T-'! ~. 'couNTY SANITATION. DISTRlCTS T£L.EPHON£S: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127, f"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF'F'·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Hon. Aran Cranston United States Senate Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Cranston: June 12~ 1978 It appears ·that unless ·EPA' s propo.sed regulations implementing Section 30l(h) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act are drastically changed to be more in conformance with ·the ·adopted California Ocean Plan, your efforts to save· $1/2 billion for Cali- fornia (August 4, 1977 Congressional Record, San Diego Tribune August 15, 1977) will be nullified by EPA administrative actions. Enclosed are two communications to the Environmental Protection Agency from the California State Water Resources Control Board which indicate to me that we can have environmentally sound water pollution control programs without the above-m~ntioned wasteful expenditure of Federal, State and local tax funds. The enclosed June 3, 1977 letter of John E. Bryson, Chairman of the California State Water Resources Control Board, to Mr. Douglas Castle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, states that upwards of 1/2 billion dollars could be saved with no apparent environmental harm with the implementation of the California Ocean Plan versus a blanket secondary treatment re-· quirement. Since Mr. Bryson's letter to Mr. Castle, the Congress amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to permit waivers of the Federal secondary treatment requirement for deep ocean dischargers subject to eight statutory criteria. However, EPA's proposed regulations dated April 25, 1978, to implement this Amendment will prevent any waivers from being_ giveri. The State Water Resources Control Board confirms this conclusion in their letter to EPA dated May 11, 1978 re: Implementing Section 301(h) Modification of Secondary Treatment for Discharges to Marine COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0.BOX 8127 Senator Alan Cranston June 12, 1978 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 Page 2 Waters, by stating ·that their "proposed regulations preclude any successful application for the modification of secondary treatment for discharges to marine waters for the following reasons: 1. The requirement for no greater level of toxic constituents than would occur if complete secondary treatment were installed ·2. The requirement that EPA's water quality criteria for man-made toxic constituents be achieved in the effluent prior to discharge 3. The requirement that the discharge be in compliance with .. all applicable water quality standards at the date of appli- cation". I am enclosing a copy of Senator*Gravel's letter dated June 1, 1978, to the.EPA Administrator on this same subject. The· electorate in California, last Tuesday, with the passage of Proposition 13, gave all of us elected officials a clear and concise message that government.spending must be reduced and that only necessary services be provided. On behalf of the Boards of Directors of our Sanitation Districts, we request your iUllllediate attention to this pressi~g matter. 11 I _1J . JA->Ler.C:~ljl-da~&;~-. Donald ·J. Saltarelli Joint Chairman cc: California Congres.sional delegation Members of the Orange County Sanitation Districts' Board of Directors State Water Resources Control Board June 8, 1978 ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0.BOX 8127 1CMM4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540.2910 (714)962·241 I STATEMENT OF DONALD J. SALTARELLI, JOINT CHAIRMAN OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HEARING -ON MODIFICATIONS TO SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS ·. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON June 8, 1978 . My name is Donald J. Saltarelli. I am the Joint Chairman of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. The Sanita- tion Districts serve a population of 1~ million people comprising 23 cities and numerous other local entities within the metropolitan portion of Orange County.. We discharge 185 million gallons per day , of treated effluent to the ocean, 5 miles at sea in approximately 195-feet of water through a 6,000-foot-long diffuser. ~ I am accompanied today by Fred Harper, General Manager of the Sanitation Districts. For many years, we have been, through the AMSA organ~zation, one of the strongest supporters of State and Federal policies that would avoid the use of public funds and· scarce energy for unnecessary treat- ment projects. As an elected official for a city in California, I am sure you can appreciate my increased concern for a rational balance of water pollution control objectives and the cost-effective use of public funds. Last Tuesday, the electorate in California, by Constitutional Amendment, slashed the ability of the State and local governments to tax property .owners, by 60%. This was a clear and concise demand by the taxpayers that government spending be reduced and that only necessary ~) services be provided. ~ If our agency is required to go to full secondary treatment, another $100 million in capital costs will be required, plus the attendant annual operating and maintenance costs, to be borne by the local taxpayer (approx. $7 million) without any measureable improvement to the environment. While we are not here today to plead a case for the Orange County Sanitation Districts, I believe it is relative to express our approach for a waiver. We expect to comply in 1981 with the 1978 adopted Cali- fornia Ocean Plan. We are committed to the construction of 125 mgd of secondary treatment facilities. We expect our blended flow to the ocean to contain less than 100 mg/l BOD and 65 mg/l suspended solids by 1981. In addition, we have adopted a phased source-control ordinance which regulates the discharge of toxic waste constituents at the source. ~ In the best interest of the.public and the credibility of the entire water pollution control program, we are hopeful that EPA will modify its proposed regulations to permit a true and honest evaluation of a local ~gency's ability to meet the intent of Co~gress to grant waivers of the secondary treatment requirement where local agencies can demonstrate that something less than secondary treatment is adequate to protect the deep marine waters into which they discharge. EPA's proposed regulations implementing Section 30l(h) of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 (PL 95-217) has precluded many applicants who qualify under the intent of the legislation from success- fully obtaining a modification of secondary treatment requirements for the following reasons: -2- • • • Toxic pollutant removals equivalent to those achieved by secondary treatment are ~equired despite the fact that less than secondary treatment would be allowed if a modification were granted • • Effluent concentrations of man-made organics (such as polychlorinated biphenyls) are not to exceed EPA marine water quality criteria with no allowance made for initial dilution in the receiving waters. EPA's marine water quality cri~eria were developed based on the premise, that appropriate application factors (dilution) would be considered • • ·Applicants must demonstrate their discharge meets all . applicable State water quality standards on the date of application. Toxic pollutant removal equivalent to secondary treatment will preclude issuance of a waiver for all Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POT\·7's) which have any type of industrial or comrne·rcial discharges to its system. Removals of trace metals and synthetic organics by intermediate treatment methods (advanced primary) cannot achieve the same reductions as biological secondary treatment •. Thus, those POTW's seeking a modification will -3- be required to implement source controls oore stringent than the industrial pretreatment requirements if tbey are ·to achieve the specified removals. The intent of Congress was to provide for "attainment or maintenance of that water quality which assures p~otection of public water supplies and the protection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, . "' fish and wildlife, and allow recreational activities, in and on the water" (PL 95-217, 33 USC 1342). If the intent is followed, based upon compliance with applicable State and Federal marine water quality criteria and environmental monitoring data, then , toxic pollutant removal equivalent to secondary treatment should not be required. If an applicant can demonstrate th~t he has a substantial likelihood of achieving effluent quality specified in a modified permit and the discharge "will not result in the discharge of pollutants in quantities which may reasonably be anticipated to pose an unacceptable risk to hucan health or the environment because of bioaccurnulation, persistency in the environment, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity (including carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or teratogenicity), or synergistic propensities" (PL 92-217, 33 USC 314), then compliance with State and EPA marine water quality criteria is all that is necessary to provide for environmental protection in deep ocean waters. ·• -4- . The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, like other .major marine dischargers seeking a NPDES Permit modification, now have an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letter specifying a schedule for meeting secondary treatinent requirements. The Districts will not achieve compliance with existing State water quality standards until construction of additional treat- ment facilitie~ is completed. Construction of these facilities and full implementation of the phased industrial source control ordinance will continue for several years. Ocean monitoring studies have shown effects on the marine environment from ,our discharge to be relatively minor. ~ The proposed re~ulations call for physical, chemical, and bio- logical assessments to be used in making a determination of overall environmental effects and to support the request for a modification of the 30 mg/l requirement for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and t~tal susr~midcd soli.ds. Such .. environmental assess- ments in specific geographic locations were.intended by Congress to be used by an applicant to support its case for a modification. In the large coastal metropolitan areas ~f Southern California, implementation of State and Federal regulations for wastewater treatment has been a long and costly process. To date, signi- ficant progress has been made in developing effective industrial source control programs, upgrading treatment (including sludge disposal), initiating cost-effective wastewater reclamation -5- ·. projects, and monitoring .~nvironmental impacts. Some of the . ocean research ~nd monitoring work completed to date has received worldwide recognition and added significantly to our understanding of the effects of wastewater effluent discharge on the marine environment. We can appreciate the difficulty involved in drafting these proposed regul~tions and the even more difficult task of reviewing applications· and granting modified permits. However, we believe that a more reasonable approach in defining removal , criteria and specifying application information is necessary. Attached are our recommended changes to the draft regulations ~· which we hope will assist you in developing final regulations. We will be happy to provide any additional information or to assist you further. -6- r EXISTING AND FUTURE TREATMENT CAPACITY ISSUE The proposed criteria provide for increases in design capacity up to the flow limitations specified in the applicant's current N.P.D.E.S. permit. Additional treatment facilities to accommodate ·. planned growth or to improve effluent quality which have been planned, under design, or construction prior to the date of the filing of the application, are not considered as "in place". This also applies to adopted source control provisions or pretreatment facilities which have not been fully implemented. Also, no increases in effluent volume from areas outside an applicant's existing ser- vice area are qJlowed. PROPOSED CHANGE For both capacity and quality purposes, "existing discharge" should be defined to include all facilities which have been proposed or approved under Step I, II, or III EPA grants prior to the date .of application. Tnis would provide for consideration of capacity increases both within and outside the existing service area which have been planned or approved. The criteria should also allow "existing" facilities to include proposed improvements that have been delayed a~ a result of Step I planning (EIS activities) under review by the State or EPA at ~ the time of waiver. •. !-\. TOXIC POLLUTANT :REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS ISSUE The criteria state that an applicant must (1) meet EPA marine water quality criteria after initial dilution or (2) the level of effluent quality obtainable by secondary treatment, whichever is the most st~ingent. DISCUSSION EPA marine water quality criteria have not yet been adopted and there are some applicants who will not have secondary treatment facilities or industrial source control programs on which to base their detailed assessments of effluent quality. Because of the lack of criteria and removal data for toxic pollutants, applicants should be allowed to demonstrate to the best of their. ability how toxic pollutants will be removed and what the seawater concentrations will be upon discharge and initial dilution. PROPOSED CHANGE . . . ~.. . The proposed regulation should be changed to eliminate the require- . . ment for removal equivalent to that achieved through secondary treatment. An applicant should be required to demonstrate that applicable state and Federal water quality criteria will be achieved upon completion of the source control programs and alternative treatment facilities he proposes in lieu of full secondary treatment. : . •. . ~ : ISSUE ·. MEETING STATE STAL~DARDS ON DATE OF APPLICATION: Will the discharge meet all applicable State water quality stan- dards (Amended Ocean Plan) at the time of application, and can the State· of California provide a letter certifying compliance? -, DISCUSSION This cannot be determined because EPA has not certified the California Ocean Plan as amended. As of this date, the SWRCB has received , no indication from EPA that they intend to certify the Ocean Plan and no time schedule has been.established. SWRCB has sent a letter to EPA in response to the Section 30l(h) Regulations asking if the Ocean Plan, as amended, will meet EPA's needs for surrogate para- meters for water quality standards for BOD and SS. At the present time, our Districts' discharge does not meet all applicable State effluent or water quality standards specified in California's Amended Ocean Plan, but anticipates achieving them in a reasonable "' period of time as new treatment facilities are completed. Most coastal conununities in California cannot presently meet all of the State's stringent effluent and water quality standards. However, most are on compliance schedules to do so within a specified time frame. If they do not ·achieve them on schedule, they face enforcement action and possible fines. I . . ·. PROPOSED CHANGE Suggest changing regulations to allow for a letter from the State stating that enforcement action will be taken against an applicant if compliance with State water quality standards is not achieved by the date specified in any existing compliance schedule • .. • TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW OF MODIFICATION APPLICATION ISSUE The Regulation contains no time limits for review of the application by EPA. There is no sense of urgency and no information to allow the . applicant to schedule his ongoing improvement program. PROPOSED CHANGE The proposed Regulation should contain specific dates or time limitations for EPA's review, hearings, collection of hearing material, decision making, and appeals. A tight time frame of appr~ximately six months should be set forth to expedite the ~ ~ process and make final determinations on secondary treatment requirements. This will minimize t~e costs associated with inflation, reduce the existing discharge of pol~utants, and avoid the possible loss or reduction of State or Federal grant funding. .. SUGGESTED CHANGES IN APPLICATION F0Rl·1 SECTION 1 PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT Subsection B. Ocean Discharge Question l-12a -The request for seasonal measurements of current speed and direction and continuous profiles of salinity iri'transects from the shore to at least one pipe- line length greater than the outfall distance offshore is an unreasonable request in some circumstances. For Example: An outfall extending 5 miles. offshore would require that one monitor salinity up to 10 miles offshore. Obviously, salinities 10 miles offshore would not be meaningful for measuring any effects from the addition of wastewater effluents to the marine environment given the dilution and dispersion it receives in the open ocean. To determine effects, data collection should be much closer .to the outfall as specified in the last part of the question • ... Sugqested Change: Delete the words "at least one pipeline length greater than the outfall distance offshore" from the first sentence of Question 1-12a. Question 1-12c -Why is continuous wind data requested? An outfall discharges at depth and relies on currents to disperse diluted wastewaters. Suggested Change: This requirement should be deleted or it should be stated why it is requested • .. • Question l-12e -Does the word "continuous" i.mpll' long-term records over a number of years at regular interval~ or does it mean 24 hours a day for some period of time? Suggested Change: Omit the word "continuous" and add language to "to show the direction of currents under different meteorological and oceanographic conditions." I . . ~ SECTION 2 COMPLIANCE WITII BOD AUD o,o. Question 2-3 reads: ·. "Provide applicable state water quality criteria levels in receiving water. You may only apply for a BOD modification if a value is entered in 2-3a or 2-3b below: a.. D.O. b. ',BOD ---mg/l mg/111 As stated, this would preclude any California marine dis- chargers from applying for a BOD modification because California's Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters (a's amended) does not contain a specific numerical criteria, but states the following: "The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not at any time be depressed more than 10 percent from that which occurs naturally, as the result of the discharge of oxygen demanding waste materials." Suggested Change: This question should be simply stated "Provide applicable State water quality criteria for receiving waters." ·Question 2-16 -This question asks for an evaluation of biostimulatory effects on environmental quality and marine organisms. It suggests that all biostimulatory effects are detrimental or undesirable. This should be reworded to account for increases in "desirable" organisms or increases in productivity from the nutrients contained in treated wastewaters • . ·. . -2- .~ 'l' A B L E 1 PREDICTED OUTFALL FLOWS AND BOD AND SS QUALITY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORAN~E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 enc> s.co-2910 (71.C) 962-2.C I 1 m .. t.'\N OUTFALL FLU\V DATE PROJECT COMPLETED PRIMARY SECONDARY TOTAL BOD SS July, 1978 *Present Plant Facili-135 MGD 30 MGD 165 MGD 200 mg/1 130 mg/I ities July, 1979 Plant No. 1, Pl-16, 135 MGD 45 MGD 180 MGD 166 mg/1 100 mg/1 60 MGD Secondary Treatment July, 1981 Plant No. 2, P2-23, 52 MGD 135 MGD 187 MGD 95 mg/1 65 mg/1 ~ 90 MGD Secondary Treatment January, 1985 Anaheim Forbay WRP 40 MGD-. 135 MGD 175 MGD 75 mg/l SO mg/1 25 MGD Reclamation . cranuary, 1991 Bolsa Chica WRP 31 MGD 135 MGD 166 MGD 60 mg/1 40 mg/1 I 25 MGD Reclamation *15 MGD is being reused by Orange County Water District d' ci ~ z -1 3: 0 ..J 11. I ) P~ATE t )· :1. ) 350 I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '( I ' I I I I I 300 I I I I · I I · I . I I · 1 PROJECT! N USED FOR ... FACILITI E PLANNING • . . ' BASED ON 113 G PCD . . . . 2501----------r--------+--------t~=:=::::=-~~~~~::--t--~-----1-----------+-------~~~----.ic='.1 USING 197 BASE~INE) ,.. -------__.,. ------------200 ,,,,.,,,,,,. 150 100 • I -· ·~ -. " .•. ' '·: . . . . · 5o I _J( I I I I ; I 11 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :1 0 I I I I I I( I I I I I I I I II I ol i I I I U) I() (J) U) en *FROM CSDOC DRAFT EIR/S U) U) 2? JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS • -~· (J) . . . . COUNTY . U) ~ CJ) (J) (J) - YEAR - SANITATION DISTRICTS OF U) -U) CJ) (J) 0 (J) • (J) (J) (J) 0 -N I I PREDICTED FLOW I NORMAL TO JOl'NT WORKS·· PHOENIX • WAL.NUT CREEK• FOUNTAIN VAL.LEY ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA d' ci :EI ZI ~ 0 ~ IJ.. 350 I ~00 250 I 200 I I 1&0 I 100 50 01 co in en .. 11 I '' .. ) PLATE,2 · ' ) ·~ . I\, ~) I I I I J I I I I I I co ~ I J t t I ' I I I I l . : I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' : . I I I t I .. I . I : _': I . ' _I_ I I . . • • 1 PROJECTI N USED FOR FACILITIE PLANNING , BASED ON 113 GPCD USING 197 BASELINE)~ I . __L___.---~~ . -----:------I pc'-v1vv,.,,,-r' L-...---~ EST!MATET ACTUA;L · 1-· . / 1 ·: · · 1 .. If PLANT J(lo. e ........... FLOW · . · · .' Sc CON ~RY . . .. I '-._ .;!' • I~ . . . . . . . . . .. I .. · . · .... . . . .. co . co "2? .. . . . . . . -,.._ ~ :ANAH ·.RECL 1 · 1---J /EST*AteO PfMARr' A..ON TO CcAN 0 lrALL. ,. . . .. .. co ,.._ O'I Cl) ~ .. co Cl) en. 80L5A~CA I R£CLAfv1 TION I -co en en en ~ YEAR *FROM CSOOC DRAFT EIR/S 1 · . 0 0 N JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS COUNTY SANITAT10N DISTRICTS PREDICTED CSDOC JOI NT. WOR.KS OF PRIMARY EFFLUENT F.LOW PHOENIX • WALNUT CREEK• FOUNTAIN VALLEY. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TO CSDOC ._.OCEAN~. dlTTF.ALL. -· c -10 _, co OI E z' z 0 i= <( a: I lf) t-:../) z w u z 0 u .·I. I ; I ) ) ) Pt.ATE 3 I I I . . I ... . . . I I I I I ! I I 3001 I I I . 250 200 ~3.i.l(.;; ~ 150 I i I I I . 1 I I I I I I 100 I I I 501 I I o I , r-, -, co sn en l i -.---1 co !? co U> ~ r-T-1 I -,... ~ I I I • I co ,... en --...1' T.TI I YEAR I 1 1 r 1 -co en co co en I l I I I I I I -en 0\ co en S?! I I I I 0 0 N PREDICTED CSDOC JOINT WORK5 BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND I JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF € SUSPENDED SOLIDS CONCENTRATION PHOENIX· WALNUT CREEK· FOUNTAIN VALLEY •I ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I TO CSDOC OCEAN OUTFALL -·---·---) PLATE 4 )\ .. . ~, )'' t • 3501 I t I r I I I I I I ( r r r r ( • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l ' ' I I I I .. I ' 300 I I l I I I · l I I I PROJECT! N USED FOR FACILJTI E PLANNING * BASED ON 113 G PCD .--- 2!50 1 USING 197 BASELINE) · -- di 200, I I ' I ~ .,,,,,--- ci ~I I ... -I ESTIMAtEcy ACTUAL I .~ I I '• ~I ISO _ FLOW ~ ~I .... . -·· . . . -.. . ·.. . .. . I . I I I . . . . .· . . 100 PLANT Na. I Pl 60 MGO CONS/A r·-· .. 90M50 CQitJST/fANT rLOW eSS . Fl 15 M60 RcCt.A/. ~o o, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I <D -.. <D -<D i <D -(0 0 I() c.o CD ,... ,... a:> Q) en. en en en g? . en en !!! en. ! !! 0 -N YEA·R *FROM CSOOC DRAFT EIR/S JOHN CAROLLO E~_GINEERS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS CSDOC JOI NT WQRKS EFFLUENT· FLOW. PREDICTED SEC.ONO.ARY TO· CSDOC OF PHOENIX • WALNUT CREEK• FOUNTAIN VALLEY ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA OCEAN·. OUTFALL . .~1· ---·i ~ iJ -·-~ STATEMENT OF ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES at the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS .,-...,, on MODIFICATION OF SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS ~OR DISCHARGES INTO MARINE WATERS Washington, D. c. June 2, 1978 My name is Fred Harper. I •.am the General Manager of the County Sani- tation Districts of Orange County, California, but I am here today in my role as President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA). AMSA is an organization made up of large metropolitan ·:sewerage agencies throughout the United States. Its membership in- . eludes 65 agencies representing more than 50 million people, the bulk . of the sewered population of this country. Appendix A is a list of ·. AMSA members. I am accompanied today by Lee C. White, AMSA Counsel • . AMSA and a number of its member agencies have been among the strongest ··.advocates of a national policy that would avoid the unnecessary expen- • · diture of public funds and the use of increasingly scarce energy in . applying the universal requirement of secondary treatment contained in PL 92-500. .We applaud the decision of Congress in the Clean Water . Act of 1977 that recognized this principle and welcome the opportunity to participate in this public hearing to discuss the regulations .. ,. ·. proposed by EPA to implement the new policy. (Section 301 {h)) of the ~ :.clean Water Act of 1977. Individual AMSA agencies will be submitting their·own detailed views at the hearing scheduled for June 8 in Seattle. The statutory requirements of Section 30l(h) and the complex and technological character of those requirements have made the job of drafting· the ~egulations very difficult. We appreciate the need for EPA to move expeditiously to be able to meet the statutory deadline of September 24, 1978, and we. are not unmindful ·of the continuing efforts that have been made to develop regulations in a fashion that ... : . will be both manageable by the applicants and consistent with the ·,. · Congressional mandate. In today's statement, we shall dwell primarily .on the procedural requirements; the substantive points will be more thoroughly discussed in the June 8 Seatt~e hearing and in the formal comments that will be submitted to EPA by the June 9 deadline. General Observations , All EPA documents, statement~, and proposed regulations treat Section . 30l(h) as though it is an unreasonable burden that was imposed upon the agency and that care must be taken to ensure that no municipal agencies qualify, or if they do qualify, that the costs and the risks .will be so great the municipal systems will not even want to file applications. We do not conceive the Congressional policy to be cast in such restrictive terms that none or only one or two agencies will ~ . qualify. AMSA's own zeal for controlling wate~ pollution, and that of its members and the millions of citizens who are served by AMSA .... ·-· .. -·..--·-. --............ ·-· .... -........... --.•····-··-· ........ ·······-· .... _·-··-· ............ -.. --... ·-··---···-... -···--·---·····-··-------............ . -2- .... -·~- members predated the 1972 Act; most AMSA·agencies were in the f~e~/~ ~ •front of the national effort to focus attention on the need to - control pollution. We believe, therefore, that our credentials are rather solid and can earnestly urge that the opportunity for modified permits adopted by Congress reflects an increasing concern that the ~ nation receive the fullest value for funds spent.on environmental · protection, in general, and water pollution control in particular. We urge, therefore, that EPA regard Section 30l(h) as an opportunity to demonstrate a willingness to accept, and even to encourage and facilitate, a process which will convince the citizenry that there can be a rational balance between water pollution control objectives and cost-effective use of public funds. It is not AMSA's belief that every coastal discharger is likely to .. meet the statutory criteria and thereby receive a modified permit, but rather it is our position that the agency should deem the new _provision to be soundly based on technology and to reflect the increas- . ing concern that public funds be employed in the most efficient .. · fashion possible. AMSA members involved are major agencies and the .. ·. ·facilities that are in question cost tens and hundreds of millions of .. ·dollars. Although 75% of that amount may be Federally funded, we '. ··· also have a concern about using Federal funds, as well as state and : ~local funds, in a manner that does not bring discredit uponthe entire ._.·water Pollution Control Program. Properly, the philosQphy of PL 92-500 .. requires the users of sewerage facilities to pay for the operation and ·:· maintenance (including replacement) of these major installations, an.d · bills for sewerage service, like all pthers, are going only one way: " up. The great na~ional concern about inflation is not somehow or .. other removed from implementing a policy deali~g with the handling of ~ .. : .. ~aste materials, 'including sewerage • . . :, . · . · ·. " Existing Discharge Con·cept .. · ·. ·Perhaps the most striking example o; the restrictive policy evidenced . ··by EPA is the narrow interpretation of "existing. discharge" incor- ·.-· porated into the proposed regulations. The summary of the purpose · ·._ of the provision contained in the Senate Committee Report (Sen. ··.::·Rep. 95-370) at page 44, reads, in part, as follows: "This section · ... amends section 301, Effluent Limitations, to provide for a modifi- ._. cation of the secondary treatment requirement for any conventional ·::Pollutant in a discharge into marine waters from existing principal . .. .sources ••• " This clearly suggests that the provision was intended ·to focus on the existing principal sources· of pollution, rather than to suggest that the policy was to preclude modification or new construction that would permit implementing the policy. It is inconceivable to us that Congress would find any rational basis for suggesting that there is virtue in conserving public funds by pre- .· -.venting unnecessary construction of expensive waste treatment facilities only if the situation that existed on December 27, 1977, met the criteria of the Act. The regulations should reflect a stringent attitude, but should not be cast in virtually impossible terms. AMSA believes that a far more sensible approach to implementing SectiQn 30l(h) is ·to adopt a policy that will encourage municipal ~ systems to discuss directly and candidly with EPA staff whether the particular circumstances that prevail in their areas make it worthy !: .. \ . ~-- ~· -3- of exploring whether an application can be prepared and submitted for consideration that has a fair chance of approval. EPA's staff should be instructed to work with communities constructively to achieve a modified permit if the physical propertie.s make it possible. Procedures In a general sense, w~ applaud the decision to· use the more informal approach of the Administrative Procedures Act. We also connnend the new approach in the proposed rules published in. th.e Federal Register .. ··for April 25, 1978, which relaxes somewhat the absolute requirements of the earlier version dealing with the submission of data subsequent to the filing deadline of September 24. All applying agencies . recognize the dilemma of spending too much time and too much money on a process that inevitably contains some element of risk. · But the ability under the proposed regulations to petition for the right to submit additional data gives at least some reasonableness to the process. We assume and we certainly urge that if. the rules go into effect as proposed, that the Administrator's discretion in this con~ ~ection will not be narrowly interpreted and administered • . . AMSA supports the concept of "tentative determinations" and believes ·that a reasonable use of.that process can result in a more manageable workload for EPA and at the same time avoid excessive cost and· expectations by applicants about their prospects for ultimately . receiving a modified permit. The regulations should make it explicit that the EPA staff can and should work w.ith the applicant in developing the tentative decision, and in particular that the staff can request ·and the applicant can submit additional data where it is required • .. Although, in most instances, the tentative decision will be accepted, there should be a process for appealing that tentative finding quickly, . to the Administrator if not the courts, in order to provide guidance ···to the applying agency as to whether it is worthwhile to make the . financial and time investment required to go forward in pursuing the · ·· total process. The regulations are silent on whether the f i1ing of the request for a modified permit is to· be given any weight in a municipal agency's position of compliance or non-compliance with the July 1, 1977, secondary treatment deadline. Although there should not necessarily be an absolute·suspension of the deadline for those municipal agencies· which are applying for 301(h) modified permits, there should be some presumption that such a filing constitutes a defense to any action by governmental or private parties on the PL 92-500 deadlines. The proposed regulations evidence great concern over the "predictive" character of implementing Section 30l(h). Certainly one can· under- stand the desirability of objective standards and tests to simplify the burden of determining whether or not a particular applicant has met the statutory criteria. However, in a real but somewhat imperfect .. world, we are continuously required to deal with the future and its vag·aries. Every reasonable effort ought· to be made to reduce .. tr -4- . implementation of Section 30l(h) to measurable standards, but in the view of AMSA, it would· be a perversion of the policy adopted by r-"'\. ·.Congress to make such an approach mandatory and exclusive. The regulation should not tie the Administrator's hands, a.nd we urge that there be qualifying language adopted which will emphasize the desirability of submissions that meet objective measurements, but at the same time provide that ·any application which makes a strong case ·. ··.that the goals can be met will not be automatically rejected. · Empirical data may not be available by the deadline for filing appli- . cations, and even if a great deal of technological and scientific measuri~g has previously taken place, there should and must be an opportunity for applicants to demonstr~te in the many ways available to advocates that a case can be made by the use of conventional techniques for forecasting how physical construction and proposed . programs wil:J. operate •. Under the proposed regulations, the Administrator may have the .. opportunity and the authority to "average" a municipal agency's total .· .. system operation, but we have foundnothing in the proposed regulation ~ that would either mandate or encourage such "average". A number of _ "major West Coast agencies have already completed or are in the process of constructing conventional secondary treatment facilities--for a : variety of ·reasons, including the availability of funds, .the belief that some secondary treatment would be desirable and the inability to predict whether legislation along· the lines of Section 30l(h) would -be enacted. It would be reassuring and reasonable to·incorporate ·. -such language into the regulations,· and we so recommend. . . Timing is· a consideration of great significance, not only because of the inflationary effects of delay, but because of the competing re- quests for funds allocated to the various states. There are short deadlines and even some requirements where the required parameters and groundriil.es .. · "will· be available later", but there is no corresponding. ·>·sense of conunitment to fix a schedule by which applications will be "processed. Admittedly, it is difficult to predict how many applications will ·be submitted, but at a minimun, the regulations should require some expedited processing and should require the development of a ~schedule t~ .guide applicants a~d others.as the process wends its way. -.. Conclusion. AMSA appreciates the inherent difficulties in administering ·section 301(h) that have been imposed upon the Administrator of EPA • . But we contend and believe logic and common sense dictate that the ·.proposed regulations must not make a nullity of the provision which . reflects a Congressional mandate and implements a rational and . reasonable policy. We urge the Administrator to accept the.suggestions contained in this statement in revising the regulations for promulga-· tion in final form • .... ' . , .. •.. . . , ..... . , .. -" \ .. ·,._ .I» . .' !· ... 1 ·' ' . . , ' ' : • •. . 1 • ' • APPENDIX A Members of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies .,, .·-' ...... !' · By State ALASKA Greater Anchorage Area Borough ARIZONA City of Tucson CALIFORNIA County Sanitation District of Orange County (Fountain Valley) East Bay Mun.icipal Utility District (Oakland} . City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County Sanitation District. Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District City of Sacramento · .. C·ity of San Diego Ci.ty and County of San Franci s~o Ventura Regional County Sanitation District City of San Jose ·coLORADO Metropolitan ·oenver Sewage Disposal District No. 1 CONNECTICUT The Metropolitan District (Hartford} FLORIDA Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Authority Orange County Sewer and \~ater Depa~tment (Orlando) City of Tampa GEORGIA City of Atlanta HAWAII City and County of Honolulu IDAHO City of Boise ILLINOIS The Metropolitan Sanitary District .. of Greater Chicago KANSAS City of Wichita KENTUCKY Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District MARYLAND City of Baltimore Washington Suburban ·sanitary Commission {Hyattsville) MASSACHUSETTS Metropolitan District Commission (Boston} . · . . South Essex Sewerage District (Salem) . MICHIGAN County of Wayne (Detroit) MINNESOTA Metropolitan Waste Contrpl Commission (St. Paul) . Westel''n Lake Superior Sanitary Distri (Du1uth} '• ~ . MISSOURI City of Kansas City Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District NEBRASKA City of Omaha NEW JERSEY Bergen County Sewerage Authority (Little Ferry) Middlesex County Sewerage Authority (Sayreville) Pas·saic Valley Sewerage Commissioners {Newark) NEW YORK Albany County Sewer District . County of Monroe (Rochester) · .. Onondaga County Department of Drainage and Sanitation (North Syracuse) · City of New York ·. NORTH CAROLINA City of Greensbor~ OHIO · City of Akron Metropolitan Sewer District of Cincinnati Cleveland Regional Sewer District City of Columbus City of Dayton City of Toledo . ..... ,--• .1. OREGON City of Portland Unified Sewerage Authority of Washington County (Hillsboro) PENNSYLVANIA ·~\ Allegheny County Sanitary Authority (Pittsburgh) City of Philadelphia TENNESSEE City of Nashville TEXAS Dallas Municipal Center · . El Paso Water Utilities City of Fort Worth Fort Worth Water Department Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority (Houston) _ . . Trinity.River Authority (Arlington) City of Houston . VIRGINIA Hamp~on ~oads Sanitation District WASHINGTON · Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle · City of Tacoma • .. . -~, :? ~ •• WEST VIRGINIA City of Charleston WISCONSIN Green Bay Metropolitan Sanitary District Metropolitan Sewerage District of the County of Milwaukee 5/22/78 • -...J. ...... -~ - SUMMARY OF REVISED JOINT WORKS 1978-79 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION REDUCTIONS AND TARGETED EXPEND ITURE SAVINGS ----REDUCTION IN CHARGE TO PROPERTY OWNER 1978-79 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAX LEVY/USER CHARGE~': 1977-78 AMOUNT RAISED BY TAX LEVY REDUCTION TO PROPERTY OWNERS TARGETED EXP EMO I TURE SAVINGS 1978-79 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 1978-79 TARG ETED EXPENDITURE LIMIT TARGETED EXPENDITURE SAVINGS ESTIMATED TOTAL REDUCTION/SAVINGS JOINT OPERATING (JO) $ 7,069,107 6,442,422 $( 626,685) $ 8,766,483 7,766,483 $ 1,000,000 $ 373,315 *EXCLUSIVE OF INDU STR IAL WASTE USER CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING (CORF) $ 6,000,000 8,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 31,030,000 30,030,000 $ 1 ,000 ,000 $ 3,200,000 JUNE 14, 1978 TOTAL JOINT WOR KS $ 13,069,107 14,642,422 $ 1,573,315 $ 39,796,483 37.796,483 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,573,315 l ~ • AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES FOR FUNDING 1978-79 OPERATING/CAPITAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS JUNE 14, 1978 JARVIS-GANN WILL REDUCE THE DISTRICTS' CURRENT (1977-78) $21.4 MILLION TAX LEVY r4"". BY A MINIMUM OF 58% IF THE DISTRICTS RECEIVE A PRO-RATA SHARE OF THE TAXES ALLOWED TO BE COLLECTED BY THE TAX LIMITATION INITIATIVE, TO A MAXIMUM OF 100% IF THE DISTRICTS RECEIVE NO TAXES UNDER THE ALLOCATION METHOD YET TO BE DECIDED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE. ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF FUNDING THE DISTRICTS SEWAGE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR 1978-79 ARE AS FOLLOWS: -FUND 1978-79 REQUIREMENTS FROM CONSTRUCTION RESERVE FUNDS ~ MAJOR ADVANTAGE -NO ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS FOR 1978-79 -MAJOR DISADVANTAGES -FUNDS RESERVED FOR CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS WOULD BE DIVERTED FROM CAPITAL TO OPERATING -NEEDED AND/OR REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WOULD BE DELAYED -FUNDS WOULD HAVE TO BE REPAID TO CONSTRUCTION RESERVES IN FUTURE YEARS REQUIRING DISPROPOR- TIONATELY HIGHER CHARGE IN THOSE YEARS -LOSS OF INTEREST EARNINGS -FUND 1978-79 REQUIREMENTS BY ESTABLISHING A FLAT RATE USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF PROPERTY TO BE COLLECTED BY THE TAX BILL -MAJOR ADVANTAGES PROVIDES FINANCING FOR 1978-79 OPERATING ANO CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL USE OF CONSTRUCTION RESERVES -STABILIZES PROPERTY OWNER CHARGES AND DISTRICTS CASH FLOW -ACCOMMODATES PHASING OF USER CHARGE/REVENUE PROGRAM REQUIRED TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN 1979-80 BY EPA AND SWRCB -MAJOR DISADVANTAGES -REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARINGS IN A RELATIVELY SHORT TIME FRAME TO IMPLEMENT -DISTRICTS WILL INCUR ADDED ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COST TO IMPLEMENT (ESTIMATED AT BETWEEN $75,000 TO $105,000) PLUS ADDED CHARGE TO COLLECT ON TAX BILL -POSSIBLE PUBLIC BACKLASH IN VIEW OF JARVIS-GANN MANDATE -FLAT USE CHARGE IS NOT EQUITABLE -CONTINUE TO LEVY FULL TAX RATE NECESSARY TO FUND 1978-79 REQUIREMENTS ON THE BASIS OF PREVIOUS COUNTY COUNSEL OPINION THAT SANITATION DISTRICT LEVY IS A "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT". SAID OPINION MAY THUS EXCLUDE THE DISTRICTS FROM APPLICATION OF JARVIS-GANN. -MAJOR ADVANTAGE -NO ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS FOR 1978-79 -MAJOR DISADVANTAGES -COUNTY COUNSEL HAS NOT YET RULED ON THIS OPINION RELATIVE TO JARVIS-GANN -MAY RESULT IN LITIGATION AND THE COURTS MAY FIND AGAINST THIS INTERPRETATION ) {a) {b) (1) (2) 1977-78 TAX FUNDING LEVEL ESTIMATED NUMBER TOTAL TAX DISTRICT OF PARCELS LEVY DEBT SERVICE 1 $1,382,548 $ 85,775 2 5,729,496 480,116 3 7,970,515 678,615 5 1,497,464 26,532 6 879,992 31,923 7 . 2,238,815 631, 13lt 11 1,729,839 85, 121 TOTAL $21,li28,669 $2,019,216 1 34, 155 2 113,610 3 156,555 5 19.365 6 21,795 7 27,075 11 28,005 AVERAGE 400,560 ) ESTIMATED OPERATING/CAPITAL USER CHARGE TO PROVIDE 1978-79 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (3) (4) (5) (6) 1978-79 COMBINED TAX/USER CHARGE FINANCING BASED ON 1977-78 FUNDING LEVEL IF DISTS DO RECEIVE PRO-RATA SHARE OF HAXIHUH OPER/ TAXES UNDER JARVIS CAPITAL USER CHARGE IF DISTS AMOUtff TO BE RECEIVE NO PRO-RAISED BY RATA SHARE OF OPER/CAP ITAL OPER/CAPITAL TAXES UNDER JARVIS HAXIHUH OPER/ USER CHARGE ( 1) -(2) ( 1) -(2) CAPITAL TAX LEVY (4) -(5) $ 1,296,773 $ 1,296,773 $ 505,781 $ 790,992 5,249,380 5,249,380 1,907,846 3,341,534 7,291,900 7,291,900 2,52lt,808 lt,767,092 1,lt70,932 1,lt70,932 579,860 891,072 8lt8,069 8lt8,069 330,324 517,7lt5 1,607,681 1,607,681 65lt,780 952,901 1,644,718 1,6ltlt,718 510,039 1, 134 ,679 $19,li09,li53 $19,li09,li53 $7,013,li38 $12,396,015 ) June llt, 1978 (7) (8) (9) 1978-79 COHBINED TAX/USER CHARGE FI NAHC lflG BASED ON REC011HENDED JOINT WORKS REDUCTION IN CHARGE TD PROPERTY OWNER AHOUNT TO BE HAXIHUH OPER/ RAISED BY OPER/ CAPITAL USER CAPITAL USER CHARGE IF DISTS CHARGE IF DISTS REC011MENDED RECEIVED NO PRO-RECEIVE PRO-RATA JOINT WORKS RATA SHARE OF SHARE OF TAXES TAX LEVY• "TAXES UNDER JARVIS UHOER JARVIS REDUCTION ~3) -(7) (3) -(5) -(7) $ 1't2,437 $ 1, 154,336 $ 648,555 388,407 4,860,973 2,953,127 572,085 6,719,815 lt,195,007 I06,66lt l,36it,268 784,lt08 103,377 71t4,692 t.14,368 156,938 1,450,743 795,963 103,lt07 1 ,5lt1 ,311 1,031,272 $1,573,315 $17,836,138 $10,822,700 OPERATING CAPITAL USER CHARGE PER PARCEL - $ 37.97 $ 23.16 $ 33. Bo $ 18.99 46.21 29.41 42.79 25.99 46.58 30.45 42.92 26.80 75.96 !i6.0l 10.i.5 1to.s 38,91 23.76 34.17 19.01 59.38 35.19 53.58 29.40 58.73 40.52 55.04 )6.82 $ 48.lt6 $ 30.95 $ lt4.53 $ 21.02 BOARD ACfiONS STAFF SUPPORT ACTIVITY ) JUNE 14 JUNE 22 ADOPT JOINT INTRODUCE WORKS BUDGETS ORDINANCE ---------'ESTABLISHING --------USER/ APPROVE IN AVAILABILITY PRINCIPLE FLAT CHARGE USER/AVAILABILITY 1L..:------- CHARGE AGAINST EACH PARCEL AND RECEIVE & FILE AUTHORIZE STAFF REPORT DESCRIBING TO PROCEED PROPERTY & CHARGE -------~i'TO BE LEVIED WAIVE PROVISIONS OF PURCHASING RESOLUTION & AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCURE NECESSARY HAT'LS, SUPPLIES & svc•s TO IMPLEMENT USER AVAILABILITY CHARGE ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REPORT JUNE 23 JUNE 28 JULY 3 JULY 5 JULY 7 JULY 18 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE ADOPT ORDINANCE ESTABLISH I NG/ AVAi LABI LITY CHARGE HEARING ON REPORT ADOPT REPORT AND AUTHORIZE COLLECTION OF USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE ON TAX BILL JULY 27 APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY SPRVSRS RE FEES TO COLLECT USER/AVAILABILITY CHARGE ON TAX BILL I PREPARATION AND REVIEW PROCESS OF INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT BUDGETS AND SUBMITTAL TO COUNTY AUDITOR EDP PROGRAMMING & PROCESSING TO EXTRACT PARCELS FROM COUNTY ROLL TO PROVIDE -FOR NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS EDP PROGRAMMING & PROCESSING TO PROVIDE PARCEL CHARGE TAPE TO COUNTY AUDITOR PRINTING OF NOTICE TO PROPERT OWNERS RE REPORT PUBLISH LEGAL NOTICES RE REPORT ADOPT INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT'S BUDGETS ADDRESS, SORT AND HAIL NOTICES f PUBLISH ORDINANCE( JUNE 14, 1978 ) '· FILE ADOPTED BUDGETS WITH COUN Y UDITOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ALL DISTRICTS TOTALED ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $21,256,752,584. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 212,567,526. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0329 . District Share of Taxes $ 7,013,438. Add: Bond Debt Funds Tota) Levy 2,019,216. Total District Share of Taxes $ . 9,032,654. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 21,428,669. Potential Loss to Districts {58%) $ 12,396,015. .. ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,440,972,476. Maximum Percentage Allowed . 01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 14,409,725. Districts Share of Tax Rate • 0351 District Share of Taxes $ 505,781. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85,775. Total District Share of Taxes $ 591,556. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,382,548. Potential Loss to District (57%) $ 790,992. ~' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $6,018,442,828. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 60,184,428. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0317 District Share of Taxes $ 1,907,846. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 480,116. Total District Share of Taxes $ 2,387,962. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 5,729,496. Potential Loss to District (58%) $ 3,341,534. ~ .• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $7,132,225,368. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 71,322,254. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0354 District Share of Taxes $ 2,524,808. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 678,615. Total District Share of Taxes $ 3,203,423. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 7,970,515. Potential Loss to District (60%) $ 4,767,092. ... ~ -· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,700,468,484. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 17,004,685. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0341 District Share of Taxes $ 579,860. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 26,532. Total District Share of Taxes $ 606,392. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,497,464. Potential Loss to District (60%) '$ 891'072. '· •. ~ .· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,214,426,020. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 12,144,260. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0272 District Share of Taxes $ 330,324. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 31,923. Total District Share of Taxes $ 362,247. 1977-78. District Tax Levy 879,992. Potential Loss to District. (59%) $ 517,745. ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $2,250,102,072. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 2·2 '501 '021 • Districts Share of Tax Rate .0291 District Share of Taxes $ 654,780. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 631, 134. Total District Share of Taxes $ 1,285,914. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 2,238,815. Potential Loss to District (43%) $ 952,901. ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,500,115,336. Maximum Percentage Allowed • 01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ T5,001,153 . Districts Share of Tax Rate • 0340 District Share of Taxes $ 510,039. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85' 121 . Total District Share of Taxes $ 595,160. 1977-78.District Tax Levy 1,729,839. Potential Loss to District (66%) $ 1,134,679. RESOLUTION NO. 78-109 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-166 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 77-166, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classification thereto, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-2" SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL .• Positions Personnel Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary 1 1 Principal Adminstrative IOSSA 9.73/12.11 1687/2099 M4e -Safety ~ Section 2. That the first paragraph of Section 7 of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "The current organizational chart of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit "C", and dated July, 1978, Revised, is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution." Section 3. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective June 30, 1978. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. ) .,., ------·-. ·-:--. ---·~-----.-.· . ._ -- -, I EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE : I : I DIR OF FINANCE ' SEC TO BOARDS .. 46 lr56' ADH IN ' f lrtNU.t ui::r I I I _L_ I I I I !1 N t S:lll r Al PYRI £ Pt:'RS FIC:r.IU liCCTG PRnp At:CTG PllRrl g, IJMC:t:' >S'T TO AS D BOA OF F ' '~0 SEC -J I I PRINCIPAL I ASS 'T TO I ACCOUNTAHT CHIEF OF PERSOtnlEL n (31) PLAN l'Al:L FACILITIES SUPERVISO~ I I PRDJc.CTS PLAN1 nu.i:: I I L I I I PRINCIPAL SENIOR PROC & . ACCOUNTAHT PROP CHIEF 23 (21) COLL FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISOR .. I FO A ORCE iCCT STRUC- TURES DIGES-PUHP GROUNDS SEWERS TERS ~TAT ION! - ~--·· -·• CJ ..._. .... _. -' -.. ·--· • -- ........... ,,._ ... _ ) : . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY ORGANIZATIO~Al CHART _-JULY, 1978 REVISED BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 310. (262)~ GENERAL MANAGER : .. : ~ . . . ·21s 111s~1 MTCE OPER & LABORATORY DEPTS SUPT 135 \I ID} i:;6 (52 23 (221 MAINT NANr'.t:' DPS:RAT1nt.1c: I AA g, .. OPER SR FACL ENGINEER PRN ADH SUPV ASST "SAFETY If 5 (36) 27 (2 J} HECH FACL ELEC FACL FACILITIES FACILITIES CHIEF LABORATORY SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR OPERATOR DIRECTOR I I I I I I I SHOP & TRHT INDUST FIXED HOB I LE INSTRU-ELECT PLANT BACT CHEH EQ.UIP EQ.UIP HENTS LAB LAB WASTE Ol'ER LAB ) f. I .. ! • T" --·-~---..... --------..1• -·--· .ir .• --• I ! EXHIBIT "C" ,~ r I -~,. ,. i : ! . ' SPECIAL : : COHHITTEES : i :., 1 • : ! I l . ! • I I I i ; I ! CHIEF i I GEN'L ENGINEER i · C?OUNSEL . ! i -lt5 t:.37l. l ENG I NEE RING DEPT .. I f I I I I NDUST WASTE PLANT t:DNSTR C:t:'R lit:~ DI ST rntJC:TR R~C: M~llT I RESOURCE! : SENIOR · SENIOR SENIOR CHIEF OF ENGINEER ENGl~EER ENGINEER HAN.\GEHEN INDUST & '. ENGINEER PERMIT ' !. .. .. '. : .. , f L : •, ~ . i ~ ; ' ~ i ;. l ~ I ;i : PERHIT . PLANT MAPS g DIST RES HARINE ECOLOGY ' CONSTR bRAFTUJG CONS TR HGKT CONN CENTER . 't.0.-.~ -_ .. ! . , ----· •• AGEMDA ITEM NO. 12C3) RESOLUTION NO. 78-106 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-166 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF· DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 77-166, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMI~E AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "8" of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to add position classifications thereto, or adjust salary ranges for position classifications therein, as set forth below: Classification Position Classification Range No. Hourly EXHIBIT "B-1" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL 10465 Personnel Assistant 1048A 5.62/7.00 10550 Personnel Aide 1047A 5.32/6.63 10555 Purch~sing Aide 1047A 5.32/6.63 . EXHIBIT "B-2" SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 60010 Instrumentation Supervisor 1056F 9.02/11.23 Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary 974/1213 922/1149 922/1149 1563/1947 • ' ·> :?- Approximate Mon~hly Equivalent Classification Position Classification Range No • Hourly Salary ~~-..:~• EXHIBIT "8-3" OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL 90335 Environmental Specialist 1053G 7.71/9.59 1336/1662 60230 Lead Instrumentation Technician 1053A 7.40/9.21 1283/1596 40100 Lead Pump Station Mechanic 1051C 6.72/8.37 1165/1451 50230 Machinist 1051C 6.72/8.37 1165/1451 80370 Laboratory Analyst III 10518 6.67/8.31 1156/1440 80940 Control Center Clerk II 1046G 5.25/6.54 910/1134 Part-Time Technician 7~50/hr •. Max. Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Res_olution No. 75-166, as amended,, be further amended to delete the following position classificiations therefrom. Classification Position Classification Range No. EXHIBIT "B-3" OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL Hourly Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary 60050 Sr. Instrumentation Foreman lOSSF 8.54/10.63 1480/1843 Section 3. That the first paragraph of Section 7 of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "The current organizational chart of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit "C", and dated July, 1978; is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution." Section 4. That any other resolution or motion or.portions.thereof, that conflict herewith, are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 5. That this resolution shall become effective June 30, 1978. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1978. ) I EXECUTIVE COHHITTEE I I OIR OF FINANCE & SEC TO BOARDS 461 m; AOHIN & f'IN"'ru,c. uc.r1 I _c: I I I T ::1 liJl~f.L PYRI & P~RS f I SCAL /CCTG PROP ACCTG PURCH & WHSE -;s•r ro AS 0 fJA Of f & 1RO SEC I I ASS'T TO I CHIEF Of PERSONtlEL 39 (31) PLAN FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISO~ I I I PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL SENIOR ACCOUNTANT ACCOUNTANT PROC & . PROP CHIEF : 23 (21) COLL FACL FACILITIES SUPERVISOR .. I PRDJE~TS PLAN Ml t.;t. L FO A, RCE :er - I I STRUC-DIGES- TURES TERS I I I GROUNDS SEWERS PUHP STATION~ ) . COUNTY SANITATION Dl.STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUHHARY ORGANIZATIO~AL CHART JULY, 1978 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 309 (26)), GENERAL MANAGER I I -215 I .I HI.:> HTCE OPER & LABORATORY DEPTS .. SUPT 135 I l I IC} i;6 _(2_2.l._ 23 (221 MAINTENANCE opr:;;, I ART. I• .... ' I OPER SR FACL ENGINEER SUPV I 45 (36) 27 (21) HECH FACL ELEC FACL FACILITIES FACILITIES CHIEF LABORATORY SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR OPERATOR DIRECTOR I I I I I SHOP & TRHT INOUST FIXED HOB I LE INSTRU-ELECT PLANT BACT CHEH WASTE EQ.UIP EQ.UIP HENTS LAB LAB OPER LAB ) .f .... r ' EXHIBIT "C 11 I ! .... : ' SPECIAL COMMITTEES .. , ; . I I• ; : CHIEF I GEN 1 L I ENGINEER i · COUNSEL ; i.;-(371 I ENGINEERING DEPT I I I I I NDUST WASTE PLANT CONSTR SENIOR CHIEF OF ENGINEER INOUST & : PERMIT ' ; 4 < ~ I PERMIT PLANT HAR I NE ECOLOGY & CONSTR CONN I C:s:'AVlrS: I SENIOR ENGl~EER ; I .. .. HAPS & ~RAFTING .. I l'lf~T rnuc:TR SENIOR ENGINEER ,, I DIST CONSTR ; -- I RESOURCES HAtiACEHEtn ENGINEER RES HGHT CENTER JUNE 14J 1978 . . . ,...... REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT ON THE MEETING OF THE WEST COAST DISCHARGERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SEATTLE JUNE 7TH, . ALSOJ YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON THE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN . . . . . PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS' FOLDERS UNDER THIS ITEM RE SENATOR CRANSTON. . . . ANNOUNCE THAT NO MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS BEING PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of Coun ty Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7: 30 p. m., June 14 , 19 78 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m . The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRISTS Waiving Provisions of Purchasing Resolution re implementation of flat rate special assessment (Alternative II) law, it was moved, seconded an d Following a brief discussion regarding the extremely tight time schedule that must be met if the Districts are to proceed with planning and procedures for implemen- tation of a flat rate special assessment and immediate avai lability charge in accordance with the provisions of state duly carried: Th at the provisions of the Districts' Purchasing Resolution No. 74-98 are hereby waived and that the General Manager be, and is here by, authorized to procure necessary materials, supp l ies and services, including postage, to proceed with implementation of said Alternative II. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Cali fornia, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June , 19 78 . IN WITNESS \\'HEREOF, I 19 78 have hereunt ~~et hand Z '~th day of June S ~t~ l~e Bo ir~s of Directors S-107 o:fj Count Saratation Districts Nos . J, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTR ICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of Nos . 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and of7 :30p.m., June l4 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the ~our . , 19 78 , 10 844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California . The Chairman of the Jo int Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary r eported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this me .eting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 1 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m ., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then dec l ared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m., June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 6:00 p .m., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8 :26 p.m., June 14, 197 8 . DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That thi s meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so ad journed at 8:26 p.m., June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m ., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m., June 14, 1978. JI~·TR ICT 7 Adfournment Moved, seconded and duly carried : That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 14, 197 8. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distri ct No . 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p .m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Ha ll. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m., June 14, 19 78. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, secon<led and duly carried: That thi s meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m ., June 22, 1978 . The Chairman then d ec lared the meeting so adjourned at 8:32 p.m., June 14, 1978. STATE OF CAL IFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5~ 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be ~ull, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June , 19 78 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 19 78 Sec etary of ~he Boards of Directors P°9 County Sa 1 n1i tat ion Districts Nos. q, 2, ;, 5, 6, 7 , and 11 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DI RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITAT ION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , and of 7 :30 p.m., June 14 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour . , 19 78 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organiza tion called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded an d duly carried: Ad journment That thi s meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be a djourned to 6:00 p.m., June 22 , 197 8. Th e Chairman then declare d the meeting so ad j ourned at 8:26 p.m., June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: Th at this meeting of t h e Board of Directors of County San itation Distri c t No . 3 be ad j our ned to 6:00 p .m ., J un e 22, 1978. Th e Chairman then de c lared the meeting so ad journed at 8 :26 p.m., June 14, 1978 . DISTRICT 5 Adjou rnment Moved, second e d and duly carri ed : That thi s meetin~ of the Board of Direc tors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourn ed t o 6:00 p.m ., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the mee ting so adjourn ed at 8:26 p.m., June 14, 197 8 . DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of th e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m., Jun e 14, 1978. JI0T!UC T 7 Ad)ournmen t Mov ed , seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Boa rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 1978 . The Chairman t h en declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 14, 1978. DISTR IC T 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meet ing of the Board of Directors of County San itation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at the Brea City Hall. The Chairman then declared t h e me eting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m., June 14, 1978. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of Cou nty Sa nit a t ion District No . 11 be ad journed to 6:00 p.m., June 22, 19 78. Th e Chairman then d eclared the meeting so ad journed at 8 :32 p.m ., J une 1 4, 1978. STATE OF CALI FORNI A) ) SS . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYN E SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sa nit a tion Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5~ 6, 7, and 11, of Or a nge County, California, do h ereby certify that the above and foregoing to be ~ull, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of June , 19 78 . IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto y hand this 14th day of June 19 78 C' 1f'l "7 • "' . MEETING DATE June 14, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DI STR JCTS 1,2 ,3,5 ,6 '7 & 11 -DISTRICT 1 WELSH) •••••••• SHARP ••••••• ____ ----_____ ~CRANK) •••••••• RJMA ••• t •••• ..:;,._ -:___ RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··-"-__ ORTIZ) •••••••• EVANS ••••••• ~ ----..__...__ . DISTRICT 2 FRIED) .••••••• WEDAA·······~ -------- RASHFORD) ••••• HOLT •••••••• _J_ --- RILEY) •••••••• ~ •••••• __L ---- COOPER) ••••••• FOX ••• ••••• .--lf._ --- ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM •••••• _v __ _ .WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON ••••• __L_ --- EVANS)·.····· ·ORTIZ······._!::'.._ --- CULViR). ·.·····PERRY······ ._.1_, ---- ROTH • •• • • • • • • s.e¥M6ttR. • • •• _v_ _ __ _ HOYT ••••• ·.··SMITH······ ._t:_ --__ ADLER) •••••••• STANTON ••••• __:!_ __ _ WINTERS) •••• • .v.£.LASQttfl. • .--1::::._ --_ DISTRICT 3 CADLER) .• ••••••• SVALSTAD •••• _.;_ ---- (MEYER) •• ••••• ·GRIFFIN····._./ ____ _ (PERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••••• ·-"-___ _ (COOPER) ••••• • .GAMBINA. • • • ._.; ___ _ LACAYO) • • • • • • ·HUDSON· • • • • ._-v ___ _ SEITZ) ••. ••••• LASZLO······-"-----WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER ••••• ·-~-__ _ FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON ••••••• ~ EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ· • • • • • .--C::---- NYBORG) ••••••• PRIEST •••• ·.-./----- YOUNG) •••••• • .ROGET· ·o ~ • .-.,,,---- RILEY} •••••••• SCHMIT ,/.G: •••• ---;7° ---- ROTH) ••••••••• SEYMOUR •• • •• -.;----- SHENKf1AN) .••••• SIEBERT..... .1 == == ZOMMI CK) •••••• SYLVIA. • • • • • .1 VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS •• ••• .J == == DISTRICT 5 fiUMMEL • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • .__.;._ --- ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • ·------ RYCKOFF) ······STRAUSS···· ._i_ ---- DISTRICT 6 (RYCKOfF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• _~·-__ (CRANK) •••••••• RIMA ••••••• ·-"-__ _ (RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •• ··~ -- DISTRICT 7 GAIDO • • • • • • • ·VARDOUL.IS· • ~ --- HOYT)········ -SMITH······-~ --- RILEY)······· ·GbARK-• • • • • ._L ____ . ORTIZ)········ ·EVANS······ .....f!!:._ __ _ HUTCHISON) •• • .GLOCKNER.··._.; ___ _ WELSH) •••••• • ·SALTARELLI •• _./ ____ _ RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS··· ._.1_ ---- DISTRICT 11 BAILEY ••••••• SHENKMAN ••• ~·----____ SHENKMAN) ••••• PATTINSO~fr·~ ____ __ RILEY)······· ·SCHMIT· lf! · ._L_ __ _ 6/14/73 JOINT BOARDS RILEY~········· ·ANTHONY·.·.~ - RILEY ·········CLARK-······_:__ ---- PERRY ··•·.-.-.··CULVER·····--- ORTIZ • ······•·EVANS······--- COOPER) • • • • • • • ·FOX· • • • • • • • ---- COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • ·--- HUTCH I SON)···· ·GLOCKNER···--- ROGET) • • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • ·--- (MEYER)··:·•··· ·GRIFFIN····--- (RASHFORD) ···•··HOLT·······---- WELLS)····•·•·· HOUSTON····---- . LACAY. O) • ·•···~·HUDSON·····---- SEITZ)••······· LASZLO·····---- RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS···--- WE I SHAU PT) • • • • ·MILLER· • • • ·---- FINLAYSON)···· ·OLSON······--__ EVANS)········ ·ORTIZ······----· SHENKMAN)····· ·PATTINSON··-__ CULVER) • • • • • • • ·PERRY· • • • • ·--__ NYBORG) • • • • • • • ·PR I EST· • • • ·--__ ANTHONY) • • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • ·--__ CRANK)········· RIMA·······--__ YOUNG)· • • • • • • • ·ROGET· • • • • ·--__ HUMMf.L) •• • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • ·--__ WELSH) ••••••••• SALTARELLI· RILEY) ••••••••• SCHMIT····.---- (ROTH) ••••••••• • SEYMOUR···.-.--- (WELSH)········ ·SHARP······==== SBAILEY) ••••••• ·SHENKMAN·.·---- SHEN[<MAN) ······SIEBERT····--_ HOYT)········· ·SMITH······--__ ADLER) • • • • • • • • ·STANTON· • • ·--__ RYCKOFF) ••••••• sTRAUSS···· ADLER) ••••••••• svALSTAD···== == ZOMMICK) ••••••• SYLVIA····· GA IDO) • •• • • • • • • VARDOULI S • .---- WINTERS) ••• ••• ·VELASQUEZ·.---- FRIED)····•··· ·WEDAA· • • • • .---- RYCKOFF) ·······WILLIAMS··.---- VELASQUEZ)···· .;;INTERS····=-=== OTHERS f y(R'•\ j, r'~r.J l. X HARPER •••• ·• _..;_ · SYLVESTER •• _v·_ LEWIS •••••• _.v_ CLARKE ••••• _J_ BROWN •••••• _L_ (' '. __.,, ·'1 · • ; •. / r,. '·, ., •·:c, -~ v' WOODRUFF, .... __ HOHENER •••• _· _ HOWARD ••••• _,/ _ HUNT ••••••• _v_ KEITH •••••• _;!____ KENNEY •••• ·-- LYNCH ••••• ·-·- MADDOX •••• ·--MARTINSON •• __ PI ER SALL ••• __ STEVENS ••• ·-- TRAVERS •••• __ • MEETING DATE June 14, 1978 :fllSTRICT 1 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7 & 11 ~CRANK) •••••••• RIMA •••••••• ...J=::::::, ----:..___ WELSH) •••••••• SHARP ••••••• ~ ----____ RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ··-£ --- ORTIZ) •••••••• EVANS •••••• -------__ DISTRICT 2 FRIEo) •••••••• wEDAA·······~ ------ RASHFORD) ••••• HOLT •••••••• ~ --- RI LEV) •••••••• eLARI< ••• • •• -~ ---- COOP ER) ••••••• FOX ••• • • • • • -~ ---- ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ·~ --_ .WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON ••••• ~ __ _ EVANS)· •• •••• -ORTIZ······ • .A.!_ ----CULV~R). ·.·····PERRY·······~ ---- ROTH ••••• • • •• &EYf16UR • • • • • ,._....---___ _ HOYT ••••••••• SMITH· ••• ••• CL ___ _ ADLER) •••••••• STANTON •••• ·-.!:::::'.::: ___ _ WINTERS) •••••• VELASQY66 • ·--1:::::::::: __ _ DISTRICT 3 (ADLER).· ••••••• SVALSTAD ••• ·~ ___ _ ~(MEYER) •• ••••• -GRIFFIN·····~ ___ _ PERRY) ......... CULVER ••••• ·~ ___ _ COOPER) •••••• -GAMBINA· • • • ·~ ___ _ LACAYO) • • • • • • ·HUDSON· • • • • ·~ --__ SE I TZJ ••• • • • • ·LASZLO· • • • • ·~ ----WE I SHAU PT) •••• MILLER ••••• ·~ ___ _ FINLAYSON) •••• QLSON-······~ EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ •••••• ·~ ---- NYBORG) ••••••• PRIEST •••• ·.-;:::::---- YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET·······~ == == RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT •••••• ~ ROTH).• •. • •••••• SEYP101:JR-. • • • • v=:-== == SHENKMAN),. •••• SI EBERT •••• ·.....k::::. ___ _ ZOMMICKJ •••••• SYLVIA •••••• ~ VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS ••••• ~ == == DISTRICT 5 liUMMEL • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·......a..c::::: --- ANTHONY) • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • ·~ ---- RYCKOFF) • • • • ··STRAUSS· • • • ·~ ---- D JSTRI CT 6 ~RYCKOfF) •••••• MC INNIS •••• -JL... __ _ CRANK).• ••••••• RIMA •••••••• ...JL.. __ _ RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• -JL. --- DISTRICT 7 . .. GAIDO • • • • • • • ·VARDOULIS· • ~ ---HOYT) •• • ••• •• ·SMITH.······ CL. ___ _ RI LEY)······· .QLAR*· • • • • • • V'" ___ _ ORTIZ)···· .• ••• EVANS·······()...... __ _ HUTCHISON) •••• GLOCKNER···~ __ _ WELSH) •••• • • •• SAL TAR ELLI • • ~ ___ _ RYCKOFF) ······WILLIAMS··· ·--t::::: ---- DISTRICT 11 BAI LEV ••••••• SHENKMAN ••• ~· SHENKMAN) ••••• PATTINSON ••• Q.... --- RILEY)······· ·SCHMIT······ v--"" == == G/14/73 JOINT BOARDS ~I, \:ttlf.)~\1l(S) · RILEYi·········ANTHONY····~ ---- RI LE\' • • • • • • • • ..et:AR Ks • • • • • ~ --- PE RRV •••• ...... ··CULVER····-~ - . ORTIZ ·········EVANS······~ ---- COOPER)······· ·FOX·······-~ -- COOPER)··•··•• ·GAMBINA· • • ._w:::_ -- HUTCHISON)···· ·GLOCKNER···~ --· ROGET)········ ·GRAHAM·····~ -- (MEYER)· ·: • • • • • ·GR I FF IN·· • -~ -- (RASHFORD) ···•··HOLT·•····-~ -- WELLS)··•·•···· HOUSTON···.~ -- LACAYO) • • • • • • • • HUDSON· • • • -~.: -- SEITZ J .• • ·•·····LASZLO·····~ -- RYCKOFF) ·······MC INNIS·· .__w::::_ -- WEISHAUPT)···• ·MILLER···· ·,....JL_ -- FINLAYSON)···· ·OLSON······~ __ EVANS)········ ·ORTIZ······~ __ • SllENKMAN) •••••• PATTI fl 8 9U I • -- CULVER)······· ·PERRY······~-·-. NYBORG) ········PRIEST·····~ __ ANTHONY)······ ·RILEY······~ __ CRANK)·········RIMA·······~ ~ YOUNG) • • • • • • • • ·ROGET· • • • • • ~ __ HUMMf.~) ••• • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ~ __ WELSH •••• ··.··SALTARELLI·~ __ RILEY ••••••••• SCHMIT·····~ ROTH) •••••• • ••• SE?tCMQUR· • • ·~ -- (WELSH)········ ·SHARP······~== SBAILEY) ••••••• ·SHENKMAN·.-~ -- SHENt<MAN) ······SI EBERT··· •-\L.,. __ HOYT)··········SMITH······~ ADLER) ••••••••• STANTON····~ == RYCKOfF) • • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • ·~ __ ADLER) ••••••••• SVALSTAD···~ ZOMMI CK)······. SYLVIA·····~ -- GA IDO) • • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S • • V"'. -- WI Nfl:~S) •• •• •• ·¥ELASitJEZ· • = .. ·· FRIED)········ .WEDAA· • • • • ·~ RYCKOFf). ······WILLIAMS··· v -- VELASQUEZ)···· .;aNTERS • • • • ...J:::::_ == OTHERS HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER.·-- LEWIS ••••• ·-- CLARKE •••• ·-- BROWN ••••• ·-- WOODRUFF •• ·-- HOHENER ••• ·-- HOWARD •••• ·-- HUNT ••••••• __ KEITH ••••• ·-- KENNEY •••• ·-- LYNCH •••••• __ MADDOX •••• ·-- MARTINSON.·-- p I ER SALL. •• __ STEVENS •••• __ TRAVERS •••• __ June 1 4, 1978 Joint Mtg . (7a) Report of the Joint Chairman Sa l tarelli reported that h e and Mr . Harper we nt to Seattle on June 7 t h to a meeting of the West Coast dischargers re secondary t reatment . (Saved $48 by sleeping in same room with FAH) He then r ead the memo in the Directors ' folders signed by him and l ette r h e wrote to Senator Cranston . Sa i d the State Water Resourc es Control Board r eally supported our points there . Announced that there wou l d not b e a meeting of the Executive Committee th i s month. (7b) Report of the Genera l Manager Mr. Harper referred to the booklet in the Directors' fol de rs from the Southern California Coasta l Water Research Project . Was written by Commissioners in laymen 's language to get some of the points across from their studies. Briefly reported on supplemental agenda items : Item 17(a) Opened bids on Warehouse Office Expansion. Four b ids came in considerably over estimate of architect . We are recommending re j ecting a ll bids and later when we fee l there is a little b et t e r bidding, will g o out again to rec e ive bids . Item 24(a) Have a req u est f r om the Ci ty of Costa Mesa for a permit easeme nt. District 6 a ctua lly own s t he r i ght of way in fee . Are recommending it be a permit rather than a n actua l easeme nt because there is some va lu e there. Item 2 6 (a )&(b ) Re District 7 i tems, these are two annexations that LAFC h as appr oved and we are recommending that we proc eed with them . Item 28(a) We opened b i ds Wednesday (6/1 3) on two sewer projects and we are recommending th at th is be awarded . It is over the engineer's esti mate b ut staff feels that the eng ineer 's e s t ima te was rather low . Cost of the p i pe is what drove the price up . Item 28(b) Also recommending a n nexat ion be approved. LAFC has approved . (7c) Report o f the General Counsel TLW said he had nothing to report. Were a couple of i tems on the agenda which h e wou l d report o n la ter . (12) Items recommended by E .C. Joint Ch a irman Saltare l li cast a una nimous ballot for items (4) & (5) in lie u of a roll call vote. (6) ALL DISTRICT S -added this item to age n da Re Jarvis-Gann, repo rted t h ey just compl eted a meeting prior t o Joint meeting a n d asked Chairman of the Board of Supervisors (Ri l ey) if they were going t o allocate a n y money to the Sanitation Districts because of our inabili ty to l e vy taxes . Chairman Riley said there had been some discussion regarding th is but haven 't bee n any decisions made . It may even go t o the ballot in November. Poss ibly is very possib l e as far as this District i s conc er n ed . Sa ltare lli added then that we may get anywhere f rom a certain perce n tage t o zero. Will l ose $2 1 mi l l ion of our budget. Ca n only put deb t se rvi ce on tax ro ll . Need to raise $19 million. Are two methods to accomp li sh t hi s . One method to fund to fund 78/79 requirements would be to establish a flat rate availability user charge on the tax bill. Can apply user charge after the first year. To accomplish this we must have all the information to the County Auditor by August 10th which will require we hold a special Board meeting next week on an ordinance that will be implemented for establishment of a flat rate user charge. Other method is to continue to levy full tax rate on basis of County Counsel's opinion that the District charges a special assessment and not a tax. Saltarelli said it was their reconunendation tonight that they direct Counsel to proceed in obtaining an opinion as to whether we can go with that alternative and at the same time be prepared to move ahead with the flat rate charge . Only other alternative is to not collect any money and use money from reserves. Will lose $6 million in interest plus the $21 million. Sharp stated that Saltarelli explained it very clearly. If we did this, would be sure to explain it in a way that was understandable to the taxpayers . Ryckoff added Board asking for Alternative 3 & 2 assuming that we aren't going to spend our balances and assuming that we are going to put something on the tax bill. If we do alternative 2, will be realizing "X" Dollars and if we do alternative 3, will be realizing a bout the same. We will be reclassifying what households pay under #2. Seems better to do what we h ave always done. Sharp stated that there would be an 18 % increase on his house if flat rate charged rather than h ave it vary according to use. Svalstad asked regard ing tax rate if we didn 't lower it, how much would we recoup? Saltarelli stated that Jarvis-Gann will put tax rates back to 75/76. Will h ave to raise the tax rate accordingly. If we call it a tax, run into some SB 90 problems because some Districts are at their maximum. If we go on basis that it is not a· tax , then can say it is not subject to SB 90. Said #3 is challengeable. Somebody could file a suit. Are going to have tobe prepared to go to user charge for one year. Will be inequitable for one year but will be corrected the fol low- ing year on the user basis. Rima asked what plan the Fiscal Policy Conunittee backed. Saltarelli answered that they felt that we should meet requirements to do Alternative 2 by August 10th and a lso Direct the General Counsel to proceed with Alternative 3 . If that comes through, won 't have to finish Alternative 2. Want to e liminate Alternative 1. Saltarelli asked how we could raise the tax. TLW said since it is not a tax, not really within rules of Jarvis -Gann. Holt reported further regarding conversation at earlier meeting that evening. This is something we can't afford to overlook. If we go with Plan 2 or 3, have to take a real strong look at operating budget and capital projects proposed and cut the things that are nice to have and consider the ones we have to have. Have to have this information to defend our position on 2 or 3. -2- Saltarelli reiterated that the Fiscal Policy Committee se l ected Alternative 3 to keep it on tax rolls as special assessment but be prepared with Alternative 2 to go with flat rate . Need direction tonight from Board to have staff proceed in that manner. ·Svalstad asked re budgets, if we approve this concept, what can we do to cut these things in the budgets? Can we change anything later? FAH referred to the fund sheet of the goldenrod report in Directors' folders. Have cut the joint construction and operation budget by $1~ million over last year. In addition to that the staff will attempt to operate at $1 million less in each of the budgets. If we start approaching $7.7 million expenditures this coming year, we will come back to Directors asking for some adjustments. Recommend this approach rather than cut the budget $1 million now. Don't t hink that there is much of a problem with CORF; however, these numbers will be cranked back into individual Districts and at that point can jog around. Saltarelli stated that to cut our budgets, must cut the flow. Most feasible way to set up system to cut flow. Other method is to is to go to individual District budgets for capital funds and delay or cancel individual projects. In doing that will be cutting off new service connections for some years down the road. Very difficult to cut here as dealing with essential services. Vardoulis asked about higher connection fees in areas where there is a considerable amount of growth. Was answered that yes , that could be done in any District. Will know more late r. Saltarelli stated that they needed a motion from someone to authorize the staff to proceed as discussed. It was so moved and seconded. ( Saltarelli then referred to timetable for actions required. Set June 22nd as the date for an adjourned joint meet ing at 6:00 p.m . . TLW said this will be a short meeting to introduce ordinance and to provide individual mailed notices to every owner in Orange County. 1 Hearing on July 18th will be to consider protests, etc. Probably would have opinion of County Counsel before then which wou ld allow County Auditor to proceed on ad valorem charge in lieu of flat rate. Saltarelli added that in order to meet this time sched ule, staff wi ll not be able to go out for bids to get company to do EDP work. Need authority to waive provisions of reso to go out to bid. It was moved and seconded to amend existing motion to incl ude waiving portion of resolution requiring District to go out to bid. Directors wondered where to hold hearing. Had a hand vote and decided to hold it at Districts' office. Discussed whether to hold it July 18th or 19th. Voted on July 19th by a show of hands, at 6:00 p.m. FAH advised that staff will be mailing out postcards but won 't be that much information so will be taking out some ads in local newspaper to explain why the charge and the positions behind it. If we do a good job in this area, probably won't be many people at h earing. Are three Districts that have a rather high charge--Districts 5, 7 and 11. Are getting updated parcel map. -3- --- Svalstad asked if we are going to explain what will happen to construction in certain areas if it wasn't approve? Answered yes. Williams asked if they could have a choice of June 22 or 21st for adjourned meeting. By show of hands only four couldn't come June 22 so did not change date. Called for VOICE VOTE ON MOTION. Motion carried. Graham asked why we didn't have June 30th deadline like cities. TLW said if we go on alternative 2 or 3, will be outside of Jarvis-Gann. If we proceed with ad valorern rate, not within Jarvis-Gann. If we go with alternate 2 establishing a service charge, is not a tax and, therefore, June 30 does not make any difference. Graham asked what if County Counsel determines thatit'satax? TLW said maybe by proceeding with variable rate, somebody might challenge it. Said he didn't have any difficulty with proposed service charge here but can't guarantee some taxpayer won't serve us with a lawsuit. Think there is a minimal risk. Nornations for Joint Chairman & Vice Joint Chairman Olson nominated Saltarelli for Joint Chairman and Fox for Vice Joint Chairman. Motion seconded. Moved nominations be closed. Seconded. Called for the question. Voice vote. Motion carried . TLW pointed out that the actual election will be in July. Rules of Procedure do not allow taking nominations from floor in July unless resolution passed setting aside rules. (30) DISTRICT 11 -Coast Highway Trunk Sewer REL referred to staff report in Directors' folders re Coastal Commission deniel to build Coast Highway Trunk. Said the matter was set aside for two weeks because the Coastal Commission meeting and the City Council meeting were the same day. Staff has received al l approvals from various agencies, Fish & Garnes, etc. These were all submitted to Commission. Their main concern was Master Plan alignment and Bolsa Chica area. Permit was for only up to Lake Street but denial was based on Master Plan. If not built, a major portion of drainage area west of Newland and south of Garfield wi ll be a problem . Will keep Directors informed of progress. Meeting wi ll be in two weeks. Shenkman stated that h~ would have the City Council and staff meet with District staff before the Coastal Commission meeting. -4 -