HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-05-10COUNTY .SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. a. sax 8127, F'OUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIF'ORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF'F'-RAMP, SAN DIEGO F'REEWAY)
May 3, 1978
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2., 3., 5; 6J 7 ·& '11
WEDNESDAY) MAY lOJ '1978 -7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA
'11he next reqular rc~ee"i::ing of the Boc=t.rdG of Directo:c.s of County
s~ni t'·~tion Dis tr ic t:s Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange
County, California, will be held at the above hour and date.
Scheduled upcoming meetings:
FISCAL POLICY CO.tvlMI'I·rrEE -1.ruesday, May 9, 1978 at 11:00 a.m ..
TELEPHCN ES:
AREA CCOE 714
540-2910
962-2411
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, May 24, 1978 at 5:30 p.m.
NEW DIREC'rORS ORIENT.l\TION :MEETING -Wednesday, May 31, 1978 at
6:00 p.m. (TENTATIVE)
Month
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC"fS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board
Meeting Date
May 10, 1978
June 14, 1978
July 12, 1978
Aug. 9, 1978
Sep. 13, 1978
Oct. 11, 1978
Nov. 8, 1978
Dec. 13, 1978
Jan. 10, 1979
Feb. 14, 1979
Mar. 14, 1979
Apr. 11, 1979
May 9, 1979
Tentative Executive
Committee Meeting Date
May 24, 1978
June 28, 1978
July 26, 1978
None Scheduled
Sep. 27, 1978
Oct. 25, 1978
Nov. 222 1978
None Scheduled
Jan. 24, 1979
Feb. 28, 1979
Mar. 28, 1979
Apr. 25, 1979
May 23, 1979
...
/
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
PO!it Office Box 8127 County Sanifation Districts
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
• MEETING DATE
MAY 10, 1978 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. "IN ADDITION, STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY .
PRECEDIN~ WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRiCTS 1 BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegianc~ and Invocat io_n ·
(2) Roll Call
(3) Recognit~on of special guests
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See suppl~rnental agenda
(5) EACH DI STRICT
(6)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District I -April 12, 1978, regular
District 2 -April 12, 1978, regular
District 3 -April 12, 1978, regular
District 5 -April 12, 1978, regular
District 6 -April 12, 1978, regular
District 7 -April 12, 1978, regular
District 11 April 12, 1978, regular
EACH DISTRICT
Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern of the Boards
(a) District 1
(b) District 2
(c) District 3
(d) District 5
(e) District 6
(f) District 7
(g) District 11
(7) Appointment of ·chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vo~e will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 5 -See page (s) "D"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "D"
DISTRICT NO. 11 -NONE
(10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS, 10(A) THROUGH 10(EE)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one.action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, stnte
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar . ..
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items npp~nring
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
; · ...
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Stephen E. Thorne, dated April 18, 1978, in the amount of
$5,131.00, for damages incurred in connection with a sewage
backup, and refer to the Districts' liability insurance
carrier for appropriate action
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted
by Abco Hardware & Builders Supply, Inc. in the amount of $878.30
against C. I-I. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical
Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-23-3
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-80, amending Resolution
No. 78-36, approving plans and specifications for Warehouse
Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, authorizing a change in the
date for receipt of bids from April 27, 1978, to June 1, 1978.
See page "E"
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (1) 3/4 Ton Cab &
Chassis, Specification No. A-089 (Rebid), to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc.
in the amount of $5 , 618. 00. See page "F"
(e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of Three (3) One-Ton Cab &
Chassis, Specification No. A-091, to Theodore Robins Ford, in
the amount of $17, 276. 94. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-81, adopting revised Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, to conform with the 1978 legislation, as recommended
by the General Counsel. See pages "H" and "I"
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-82, authorizing execution of
Easement Deed to the City of Huntington Beach for slope encroachment on
30-foot utility corridor in connection with widening and improvements
of the Hami 1 ton Street bridge crossing. See page "J"
(h) · Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l,
authorizing an addition of $11,376.10 to the contract with
Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for miscellaneous paving improvements and
pipe supports, and granting a time extension of 65 calendar days
for completion of this work and due to inclement weather. See
page "K"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
,...,,..:_. __ --
(IO) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-1,
authorizing a deduction of $1,323. 74 from the contract with
Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. due to landscaping modifications. Sec
page "L"
(j) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total
deduction of $3,515.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig,
Inc. See page "M"
(k) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-83, accepting Flood Wall and
Site Development for 75 MGD.Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-23-l, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement (Final
contract price: $2,279,868.08) See page "N"
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-84, approving plans and
specifications for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet
Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, and authorizing
advertising for bids to be received on June 1, 1978. See
page "0"
DISTRICT 2
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing extension of the final date
for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental
Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, from
March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
(n) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
John J. Carusillo for annexation of .475 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country
Hill Road in the City of Anaheim; and Standard Resolution
No. 78-91-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex
said territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 31 -
Carusillo Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2)
See page "P"
(o) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
Anaheim Hills, Inc. for annexation of .755 acres of territory
to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, and refer to staff
for study and recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 32 -
Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District
No. 2) See page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
.. -
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
\.,,,,I DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-85-2, making a negative
declaration re Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, and
providing for notice thereof. See page "R"
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-86-2, approving plans and
specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: June 13, 1978). See
page "S"
(r) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-87-2, making a negative
declaration re Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20,
and providing for notice thereof. See page "T"
(s) Consideration of Resolution_No. 78-88-2, approving plans and
specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: June 13, 1978). See
page "U"
(t) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-89-2, authorizing acceptance
of Grant Deed from the City of Placentia for right of way
in connection with construction of the Richfield Sub-Trunk,
Contract No. 2-19, at no cost to the District. See page "V"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-90-2, authorizing execution
of Pipe Line License Agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway Company for right of way in connection with
construction of the Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, and
the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, at no cost
to the District. See page "W"
DISTRICT 3
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-92-3, making a negative
declaration re Westside Relief Force Main, Second Unit, Contract
No. 3-13-1, and providing for notice thereof. See page "X"
(w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $7,983.00 to the
contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture, for construction
of a field closure, and granting a time extension of 5 calendar
days for completion of said work. See page "Y"
(x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Progress Report
re Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and
Orangethorpc Re lief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1.
See page "Z"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(y) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-93, making a negative
declaration re Santa Ana River Siphon, and providing for
notice thereof. See page "AA"
DISTRICT 7
(z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-94-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 43.21 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity southwesterly of the terminus of
Encanto Street and near the intersection of Cerritos Drive, in
the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 77 -Tract No. 5382
to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "BB"
(aa) Consideration .of Standard Resolution No. 78-95-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 9.010 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of Lemon Heights Drive between
Vista del Lago and La Cuesta, proposed Annexation No. 78 -Tract
No. 9688 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed
to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "BB"
(bb) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-96-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex .784 acres of territory to
(cc)
the District in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overhill,
proposed Annexation No. 79 -Medina Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance
District) See page "BB"
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-97-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 7.082 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity southeast of Santiago Canyon Road
and Jamestown Way in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 80 -
Tract No. 9472 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "BB"
(dd) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-98-7, ordering
annexation of 10.02 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the southeast corner of Or~nge Park Boulevard and
Amapola Avenue in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 66 -
Tract No. 9687 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "BB"
DISTRICT 11
(ee) Consideration of items relative to construction of Warner Avenue
Relief Sewer -Phase II:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
the City of Huntington Beach, dated April 11, 1978, to
enter into an agreement with the District to design and
and construct a portion of the District's Master Plan sewers· -
Warner Avenue Relief Sewer -Phase II. See page "CC"
(2) Consideration of motion declaring intent to enter into Standard
Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington \.-I
Beach for design and construction of Warner Avenue Relief Sewer -
Phase II.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
-6-
(ll) . .
(12)
ALL UISTRlCTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee's written report
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee:
(a) Consideration of items re data processing report and recommendation:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file report and
recommendation of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell &· Co. re data
processing (Copy enclosed with agenda material)
(2) Consideration of motion approving recommendation of Peat,
Marwick, Mitchell & Co. to acquire an in-house mini-computer
system, and appoving action plan for installation of said system
(3) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell.& Co., dated May 2, 1978, for design
of data processing system .and vendor selection assistance, on
a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed
$49, 636. 00. See page "DD"
(b) Consideration of items re solids handling facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1:
(1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to prepare plans
and specifications for Interim Solids Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-067, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the bid date (Tentative date: 6/13/78)
and receive bids for said work
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to prepare plans
and specifications for Under-Drain System for Digester Cleaning
Beds at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-17, and authorizing
the General Manager to establish the bid date {Tentative
date: 7 /27 /78) and receive bids for said work
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-100, adopting revised Conflict of
Interest Code and repealing Conflict of Interest Code adopted by
Resolution No. 76-213 on December 8, 1976. See pages "EE" and "FF"
(d) Consideration of items re recommendation for liability and workers'
compensation self-insurance:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Fiscal Policy Committee
report and recommendation re liability and workers' compensation
self-insurance (Copy enclosed with Executive Committee Report)
(2) Consideration of motion approving recommendation of Fiscal Policy
Committee and Executive Committee to implement a liability and
workers' compensation self-insurance program
(3) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff and General Counsel
to proceed with plans and implementation of liability and workers'
compensation self-insurance program effective July 1, 1978
-7-
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Discussion re impact of Jarvis-Gann Initiative and determination of
Districts' official position, if any
{15) ALL DISTrrICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director
of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31, 1978; and approving
recommended budget transfers (Copy enclosed with agenda material)
{16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(19) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or·supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 7
· Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion designating to serve as the
Director on the Board of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning
Agency (NIWA) and as the Alternate Director on said
Board
(28) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
\ . -.....
(30) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of items re proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills
Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (deferred from
April 12, 1978, Joint Meeting):
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report. See
page "GG"
(b) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve deferment of
annexation acreage fees on approximately 53 acres of property
contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation
No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2, subject to execution of
agreement between Anaheim Hills, Inc., City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, and the District, in form approved by the District's General
Counsel, providing for payment of said fees in the event the property
is later developed, at the rate in effect at the time of such
development
(c) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve agreement
between Anaheim Hills, Inc. and·the District, in form approved
by the District's General Counsel, providing for payment of
annexation fees on approximately 188 acres contained in proposed
Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County
Sanitation District No. 2, in equal annual installments over a
four-year period -1/4 to be paid prior to initiation of annexation
proceedings and the balance to be paid in three equal annual
installments with interest at the rate of 8% on the unpaid balance
~ (31) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(32) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-9-
II
.-DOA liD S OF DiRt:CTORS
Counfy Snnifa li on Di slr ic:ts Pos t Offi ce Box 8127
of Orange County, Ci!lifornift 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Voll ey, Calif., 92708
Tc lephor.cs:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 7 14
5~0 -291 0
962-24 1 1
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
MAY 10) 197 8 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DES I RING ADDIT I ONAL I NFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLE ASE CAL L THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD . IN ADDITION) STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. I MMED I ATELY
PRECEDING WE DNES DAY'S MEETING JN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTR1C TS ' BOARD ROOM ,
(1) Pledge of t.llegiance and Invocation
(2 ) Roll Ca ll
(3) Recognit~on of special guests
AOJOIJl\~:,1CNiS POSTED.:::
COili' t. :,".ILE!1GE ... I/.'. .... ..
m::s SE7 UP ....... '-"""' .. .
P.ESCLU1iG:>:S CERilfl:D.~
lclTERS '!!RITTEN ..... ~ ...
MltlliTES V:RiTil:fl .... ~:.
MINUTES HLED ..... ~ .... N
(4) Con siderat ion of motion to receive and fi l e minute excerpts , if any .
See suppl~menta l agenda
DISTRlCTsf_,2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
(4) Consideration of motion to receive· and f' l · foll · . . ' l e minute excerpts from the
.ngs,
ITE MS ON
SUPP LEMENTA L AGENDA
owing c1t1es reg~rding elections of mayors and appointme nt of
alternates, and seating n e w members of the Boards : (*Mayor)
F.L~ ................ .. Anaheim
LETI ER ............. .
A/C .... TKLR ... . Huntington Beach
-··--_.....,. Los Al amitos
Ne wport Reach
P l acentia
C.. tr\~ D
(b) District
(c) District
(d) Dist :rict
(c) Dj s trict
(f) Di st rj c t
(g ) Dist Tiet
Active Alternnte
2 & 3 Dona l d Roth ~John Seymour*
3
11
11
3
5
5
6
7
Richard W. Siebert
Ron Pattinson
Ron Sh enkman•
Ch arle:s E. Sylvia
Paul Ryckoff*
Donald Strauss
Dona l d ~lclnnis
Ray ll'i 11 i am s
2 Donald A. Holt, Jr .
1•lo ~~
2-w~ ..... ~
3-~~~
~~~:~
7-~~ .... ~
11 -~ ... ~~
Ron Shenkman•
Ron Shenk man*
Ruth Bailey
Ke nneth ZolllfTli ck*
Paul Hummel
Paul Ryckoff*
Paul Rydoff*
Paul Ryckoff*
Wi 11 iam E. Rash ford~
e~o .~
(7) Appojntmcnt of .Chajrmcn p ro t e rn, if ne c essary
_(8) ALL DISTRICTS
(' Reports of:
FILE -···--·-·••H ~ Joint Chairman
lElTER -... ".'' Gen~ral Manager
A/C _TKi.I -• (c) General Counsel
(9) ·AlL DISTRICTS
ROLL CALL VOTE ................ .
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and ''C"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 5 -See page(s) "D"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "D"
DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE
(10) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
N\\S
ITEMS NOS. 10(A) THROUGH 10(EE)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appenring
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from S3me.
-2-
(10) (CONSENT C/\LEND/\R continued from page 2)
A/C •... TKLR -··
FILE ···········-···-
LETIER ·······-··-
A/C ...• TKLR ·-
·······-··------
FILE ..•.......••..•.••
LETIER ....•••..•..••
A/C •.•. TKLR .•.•
-~ .. ~ .. ':'.".:'_
FILE ................. .
LETIER ..•...........
FILE .......••.•.••.•••
LETIER ·······-··-
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to re ceive , file and deny claim of
Stephen E. Thorne, dated April 18, 1978, in t h e amount of
$5 ,131.00, for damages incurred in connection with a sewage
backup, and re fer to the Districts ' liabi l ity insurance
c arrie r for appropriat e action
(b) Consideration of motion to rece ive and file Stop Notice submitt e d
by Abco Hardwar e & Builders Supply, Inc. in the amo un t of $878 .30
against C. l-1. Leave ll & Company, contractor for Electrical
Relia bility for 75 MGD Impro ved Treatment at Pl ant No . 2, Job
(c)
No. P2-23-3
Consideration of Resolution No. 78 -80 , ame ndin g Resolution
No . 78-36, approvin g plans and specificati ons for Warehouse
Offic e Expansion, Job No . J-13-2 , authorizing a ch ange in the
date for receipt of bids from /\pril 27 , 197 8, to June 1, 1978.
See page "E"
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabu~ation and
recommendat i on and awarding purchase of One (1) 3/4 To n Cab &
Cha ss i s , Specification No. A-089 (Rebid), to Santa /\n a Dodge , Inc.
in the amou nt of $5 , 618. 00. See page "F"
(e) Con s ideration of motion to receive and file bid t abul ation a nd
r ecommendation an cl. awardin g purchase of Three (3) One -To n Cab &
Chassis, Specification No. A-091, to Theodore Robins Ford, in
the amount of $17, 276. 94. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of Reso lution No . 78-81, adopting revis e d Guidelines
Implementing the California Environme nt a l Quality Act of 1970 ,
as amended, to con form with the 1978 l egisl ation, as recommended
by the General Counsel. See pages "I-I" and "I"
fi~~~~~-t"~nsid e r ation of Reso lution No . 78-82, ai_.1thorizing e xecution of
FILE --······-··-·
LETTER ·····--
A/C .... TKLR ••••
Easement De ed to t h e City of Huntin gton Beach for s lope encroa chm en t on
30-foot utility corridor in connection with widening and improveme n ts
of the Hami lton Street bridge crossing . See page "J"
(h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 7 to the
pl a ns and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Deve lopme nt
for 75 MGD Improved Tre a tm e nt a t Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-23-l,
auth orizing a n add ition of $11,376.10 to the contract with
Pasca l & Lud wig , In c . for miscellan eous paving improveme n ts and
pipe supports , and granting a time ext e nsi on of 65 cal endar days
f or completion o f this work and due to inclement weath er . See
p age "K"
(CO NSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
.-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
FILE ...........•..•...
LETIER ···-······~
A/C .•.• TKLR -··
FILE ......••....•....•
LETIER ············-
A/C •... TKLR ••••
FILE ............•...••
~~JL
A /C •.•. TKLR .•.•
~--~
LETIER ............ ..
A/C •..• TKLR •.••
-~----~----
FILE ·············~
~~-~-····
A/C .•.• TKLR .•••
ALL UIS1TIICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall a nd Si tc Development
for 75 MGD I mproved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-23-l,
authorizing a deduction of $ 1, 323 . 74 from the contract with
Pascal 4 Ludwig, Inc. due to landscaping modification_s. See
page "L"
(j) Consideration of motion approving Change Ord er No. 9 to the
plans and s p ecification s for Hood Wal l a nd Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatme nt at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-23 -l,
a uthori zin g a n adj ustment of en gineer 's quanti tics for a total
d eduction of $3,515.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig,
Inc. See page 11 M11
(k) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-83, accepting Fl oo d \V a ll and
Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Pl a nt No. 2,
Job No . P2-23-l, as complete; authorizing execut ion of a No tice
of Compl e tion; and approving Fina l Closeout Agreeme nt (Fina l
contract pr.ic e : $2 ,279,368 .08) See page 11 N11
(1) Consideration of Reso lution No. 78 -84, approving plans and
specifications f or Modificat ion of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet
Port at Recl a mation Plant No . 1, Job No. PW-066, an<l a uthorizing
advertisi n g for bids to be received on J une 1, 1978. See
page 1 1011
DISTRICT 2
(m) Consideration of motion authorizin g extension of the final date
for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental
Impact Report on the Carhon Canyon Facilities Plan, from
March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
(n) Consideration of motion to receiv e and file reques t from
John J . Carusillo for ann exation of .475 acres o f t e rritory
to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive a nd Country
Hi ll Road in the City of Anaheim; a nd Standard Re s olution
No. 78-91-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to ann e x
said territory to the Distrjct (P roposed Ann exation No. 31 -
Carusi ll o Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2)
See page 11 P11
(o) Consideration of motion to receive and file request fr om
Anaheim Hill s, Inc. for aPr.~xatio n of . 755 acres of territory
to the District in tho Anah e im Hills area, and refer to staff
for s tud y and recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 32 -
Anaheim Hill s Annexation No . 8 to County Sanitation District
No. 2) Sec p age ~-.'...'....~
(CON SEN T C/\LENDJ\R continued on page 5)
-4-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
FILE --------------····
LETTER ···-·-···-·-DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
A/C .•.• TKLR ...•
FILE ................ ..
LETTE R ............ ..
A/C ••.• TKLR .. ..
~--'--~.
FI LE ..•.•••.•••.......
LETTER ............•.
A/C .... TKLR ....
fllf ··--··----·--··
LETTER···--·····-··-
A/C .... TKLR -·-·
~~--
@ ~---·······
~--··········
~
FILE ···-··-······-····
LETTER ........•••.••
A/C .... TKLR ---
FI LE •...•.••.•.••.•.•.
LETTER ............••
A/C .... TKLR -·-·
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-85-2, making a ne gative
declaration re Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No . 2-19, and
providing for notice thereof. See page "R"
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 78 -86-2, approving plans and
specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: June 13, 1978). See
page "S"
(r) Consideration of Reso l ution No. 78-87-2 , makin g a negative
declaration re Orchard (Kello gg ) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2 -20,
and providing for notice thereof . See page "T"
(s) Consideration of Resolution ·No . 78 -88-2, approving plans and
specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No . 2-20,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the d at e for
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: June 13 , 1978). See
page "U"
(t) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-89-2, authorizing acceptance
of Grant Deed from the City of Placentia for right of way
in connection with construction of the Richfield Sub-Trunk,
Contract No . 2-19, at no cost to the District . See page "V"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-90 -2 , authorizing execution
of Pipe Line Li cen se Agre e men13 with The Atchison, Top eka and
Santa Fe Railw ay Company for ri ghts of way in connection with
con s truction of the Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No . 2 -19, and
the Orchard (K e llogg ) Sub-Trunk, Contract No . 2-20, at no cos-e~o..~
~o the Di tari et. See page "W" \)
~~.$~00 .
DISTRICT 3
(v) Con sideration of Resolution No. 78-92-3, makin g a negative
d ecl a ration re We s tside Relief Force Ma in, Second Unit, Contract
No. 3-13 -1, and providing for notice thereof . See p age "X"
(w) Consideration of motion approving Ch ange Ord e r No . 3 to the p lans
and specifi cations for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Re a ch 7,
Contract No . 3-20-3, authori z ing a n addition of $7,983 .00 to the
contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joi n t Venture, for construct ion
of a field c los ure , and grantin g a time extension of 5 ca l endar
d f f k "Y" ays or compl etion o said wor . See page -----
(x) Consideration of motion to r ece ive and file Staff Progress Report
r e Knott Int erceptor , Portion of Reach 7, Contract No . 3-20 -3 , and
Orangethorpe Relief Tr un k Se wer, Reach 15, Contract No . 3-22-1 .
"Z" See page
(CON SENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
: (].'.)) (CONSENT CJ\LENDJ\R continued from page S)
FILE ••.••.•.•.•.••••
LETTER ···--····
A/c .@ ..
FIL E ...•••..•...•••.••
~L~.f.
A/C •.•• TKLR ..••
)~ .. ~
FILE ............•....
·~~
A/C .... TKLR ..
FILE ·••••···•••·••••
~M'"
A/C .•. :TKLR ••.
....................... -
•H•O •ooOO O•O••-··-~·
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(y) Considera tion of Re so lution No. 78 -93 , making a negative
d ec l aration r e Santa An a Ri ver Siphon, a nd providing for
noti ce t h ereof. See page "AA "
DISTRICT 7
(z ) Consideration of Stan dard Reso lut ion No . 78-94 -7, a u thorizing
initia tion of proceedin gs to annex 4 3.21 acre s o f territory to
the Di strict in th e vicinity southwesterly of the terminus of
Enc anto Street a n d n ear the int ers ection of Cerri tos Drive, in
th e City o f Oran ge, propo sed Ann exat ion No . 77 -Tract No . 5382
to County Sanitati on District No. 7 . See p age "B B"
(aa) Con sideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-95 -7 , authorizing
initiation of proceedings to ann ex 9.010 acres of territory to
the Di s tri ct in the vicin i t y of Le mon H ei~1t s Drive b e tw een
Vista d e l Lago and La Cuesta, proposed fu1n exation No . 7 8 -Tract
No . 9688 to Co unt y Sanitation Di strict No . 7 (to also be a nnexed
to the 70th Sewer Main t e n a nc e Di s tr ict ) See page "BB"
(bb) Considerat i on of Standard Reso lution No. 78-96-7, au~h oriz in g
initiation of p r oceedings to a nn ex .78 4 a c res of territory to
(cc)
the Di s tri c t in t h e vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overh i ll,
propo sed Annexation No . 79 -Me d ina Annexation to County Sanitati on
Distri ct No . 7 (to a l so be annexed to the 70th Se wer Maintenance
Di s tri ct) See p age "BB"
Consideraticn of Stan dard Re so lution No . 78 -97 -7, authorizing
initi a tion of proceedin gs to a nn ex 7.082 acres o f terri tory to
the Di s tri ct in the vi cinity south eas t of Santiago Canyon Ro a d
and J a mestown Way in the City of Orange , proposed Annexation No . 80 -
Tract No . 9472 to County Sanitation District No . 7. See page "B B"
(dd) Considerat ion of Stand a rd Reso lut ion No . 7 8 -9 8-7 , orderin g
a nn exation of 10.02 acres of t erri tory to the Di s trict in the
vicini ty of the s outheast corner o f Orange Pa rk Rnulevard a nd
Amapola Aven u e in th e City of Orange, propos e d An n exat ion No. 66 -
"""""~~..,,.-Tract No . 9687 to Cou nty San itation Di s tri ct No. 7 . See p age "BB "
FI LE .......•....••.•.
LETIE R ............ .
A/C .... TKLR •..
DISTRICT 11
(ee ) Consideration of items rel at ive t o construction of Warner Ave nu e
Reli e f Sewer -Ph ase I I :
(1) Con sideration of motion to receive a n d fi l e r eq u est from
th e Ci t y of Hunt i n gton Beach, dated April 11, 1978 , to
en t er into an agreement wit h t he District to d esign a nd
and construct a portion of t h e District's Master Pl a n s ewers -
Warner Avenue Relief Se wer -Ph ase II . See p age "CC "
(2) Con s id e ration of mo tion d ec l arin g int en t to en ter in t o Standard
Mast er Plan Reimbursement Agreement with t he City of Huntin gton
Beach for d esign a nd con struct ion of Wa rner Av e nu e Re l ief Sewer -
Ph ase II.
END OF CO NSENT CALE ND AR
-6-
(11) ALL DI STRICTS
Con s id e ration of items deleted from c ons e nt c al e nd a r, if any
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Re port of the Ex e cutive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
and file the Committee 's writ ten r e port
(13) ALL DI ST RICT S
Conside ration of action on items recomme nded by the Executive Conunittee:
FILE .................. (a ) Consideration of items r e d a ta processing report and r ecommendation:
LETIE R ···-··-··-( l)
A/C .... TKLR -
--··-··-····-··-·-~ \ ~
Consideration of motion to receive a nd f ile report a nd
recomme ndat ion of Peat, Marw ick, Mit che ll & Co. re data
processin g (Copy enc l osed with agenda ma t e rial)
Con si der a tion of motion approving r econune ndation o f Peat ,
Marwi c k, Mitche ll & Co. to acquire an in-house min i-computer
syste m, a nd appovin g a ction plan for i n s tallation o f said system
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Peat, Mar wick , Mi t c h e ll ·& Co., dated May 2 , 19 78, for design
of d a ta p rocess in g syste m and vendor select ion ass i s t a n ce , on
a p e r diem fee b a sis for a ma ximum amo unt not to exceed
$49, 636. 00. See page 11 DD 11
(b) Consideration of items r e solids handling f acilities at Rec l a mation
Pl ant No. 1:
FILE -·-·--··-··-\ "=:>
LETIER ·····--·/:!' ( 1)
~~.9.~
Con siderat ion of motion a uth ori zi n g the staff to prepare plans
L~
FILE ···-··-·········· \ l
LETIER ········-··-~ A/C ... ~~ ~~~
<._~
~~
Roll Cal! Voto or ~
UnJ nimous Ball ot
It\\:::,
Tr:-~~~ ...
LETIER ············-
A/C .... TKLR ··-
~
~~-'
A/C .... TKlR -
l1
I\
and specifica t ions f or Interim So l ids Handling r acilities at
Recl amation Plant No . 1, Job No. PW -06 7 , a nd authori z ing the
Gener a l Manager to es t a blis h the bid date (T ent a tive dat e : 6/13/78)
and r eceive bids for said work
(2) Con sideration of motion authorizing th e staff to pre pare p l a n s
and s p e cifications for Und er -D rain Sy s t em for Di gest e r Cl e aning
Be ds at Re clamation Plant No . 1, Job No . Pl-17, a n d a u t ho riz ing
the General Mana ge r to e stab lis h t h e bid date (T entative
date: 7/27/78) and r eceive bids for said work
Con sid e r at ion of Reso lution No . 78 -1 00, a dop ting revised Conflict of
I nt erest Code and repealing Co n flict of In t eres t Code adopted by
Resol uti on No. 76-2 13 on De cember 8 , 1976 . See pages 11 EE 11 a nd 11 FF11
Con si de r a tion of i t erns r e recommendat ion for l iability and 1~ork ers '
compensation se lf-in s u ran c e :
(1) Con s ideration o f moti011 to receive a nd f ile Fiscal Pol icy Committ e e
report and r ec omme nd at ion re l iabili tv a nd worker s 1 com1)en sation
se lf-i n s ura nc e (Copy en c lo sed with Executive Committee Re port)
(2) Con s ideration of motion approvin g r ecommendation of Fiscal Policy
Conu ni tt e e a nd Executi ve Conuni tt ee to imp l eme nt a liab ili t y and
work ers ' compensation s elf-insurance pr o gram
(3) Consideration o f motion aut horizi n g the staff and Ge n era l Coun se l
to proceed with plan s and imp l e mentation of l iability and wo rkers '
comp en sation s e l f -in s uranc e pro gram eff ec tive Jul y 1, 1978
@tD ?A~·~ \, d. ~~
~ -
• . t9 J\LL DISTRICTS
Discussion re impact of Jnrvis -Gan n Init iative a nd det ermin ation of
FILE "·····-
trrr--... ---{ 15)
Af~Klk -J.7 ....................... cf\
.............. 1rrtt rtt::!!1
Dis tri c ts ' official position, if a ny C ~ ().-(;) ~)
ALL DI S T!UCTS
Co;1sidcrat ion of motion to receive a n d file finan c ial r eport o f Director
of Finance for n i n e -mo nth period ending March 3 1, 19 78 ; a nd npproving
r ecommend ed budget tra n sfers (Copy e nc losed with agenda materia l)
FILE ............ {:1·6) ALL DI ST RICTS
LETTER .............. Other busi n ess a nd communication s or s uppl ementa l age nda it ems
A/C .... TKLR ·•·• (1 6(a.)Cons:iJeration of motion approvir.g Change Order No . 1 to th ~ plans a~d
-··-·····--N'\\ S, specifications for purchase of One (1) Bird JIB -6400 0 H-Scn cs Centrifuge,
ITE MS ON · h . . l 1 . ~ c3 1 35 00 f t] stl'PPrErt.TN'fAl'"'AGENDA Sp ccificatj o n No . E-088, aut ori;nng a l eauct1on or .p , • rom 1e
l.Ji~~~~pur c ll ::isc contract \,•i th Bird Machine Cornpany due to del e tion of belt
ucinl and s pring isoJ a t or set . See p ag e "I"
\{Q(\o) ~.ry~---1c~ }'i2.. ~~~~9>.~a/\..~nnll,,,.~ TRICT 1 ~--~-r-·-.
(\@)t (\i Lbusin ess and communi cation s or s upplement a l agenda i t erns , if any
(1 8RrSTR ICT 1 .
Considerat ion o f motion to adjourn<iS: 3 ~
(20) DISTRICT 3
Consideration o f motion to ad journ <;('.~ 1
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(2 6 )
(27)
FI LE .............. , ...
~-~~-/
A/C .... T~LR ··-
(2 9 )
uu11.awi cat ion s o r s uppleme n ta l agen d a ite ms , if a ny
DISTRIC T 6
Consideration of mo tion to adjourn ~ ·-~?
DISTRICT 7
or s uppl eme nt a l agend a items , if a ny
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of mot ion to adjourn i · . .3 q
DI STR I CT 11
agend a it ems , if any
DISTRICT 11
Considera tion of motion to adjourn er>·,~ 1
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion · d esignat in g ~ ~ to serve as th e
Dit·cctor on the 13oard of the Newport -I rvine Wa s t e-Manageme nt Planni n g
Agency (NIWA) an~ ~ as the Al ternatc Director on said
Bo a r d
or supplemental agenda items , if a ny
DISTR ICT 5
Consi<lcration of mot ion to a djourn lr': c .. fD
-8 -
. . ""
(30) DI STRICT 2
Co n s ideration of ite ms re propo s ed Ann e xation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills
Ann exation No. 7 to County Sanitation Di s trict No . 2 (deferred from
April 1 2 , 1 978 , Joint Mee ting):
\ (a )
M L:S
Consideration of motion to receive a nd file s t aff r eport .
p age "GG 11
See
~Jd..: .. :::.:'.' (b) Consideration of motion dec larin g intent to approve deferme nt of
~ ......... / annexation ::i.crea ge fees on app r oxim ate ly 53 acres of property
__tj~~"t""7~ontain e d in proposed An nexation No . 28 -An a h eim Hi ll s Annexation
_ _ o . 7 to County Sanitation Di strict No. 2 , s ubject to exec ution of
@ .. !!...-.. ~ ..
~!!. __
~---!-))
~
Roll Call Vot o or Casf
Un animou s Ballot
agreeme nt b e tw een Anaheim Hi ll s , In c ., City of An ah eim, Cou nty of
Or ange , and the Di s trict, i n form ap prov ed by the Di strict 's Genera l
Counsel, pr ov idi n g for paym e nt of said fees in the even t t h e property
i s l ater develope d , a t the rate in effect at the time of such
deve l opment
Co nsid erat ion of motion declaring intent t o approve agree ment
b e tween Anaheim Hi lls, Inc . a nd the District , in form a pproved
by th e District 's Genera l Counsel, providing for pa~n e nt of
an n exation fees on approxima tely 18 8 acres contai n ed in proposed
Ann exat ion No . 28 -Anaheim Hill s An n exati on No . 7 to Co :...:nty
Sanitation Di strict No. 2 , in equ a l an nua l installments over a
fo ur-year period -1 /4 to b e paid prior to initiation of ann exation
proceedings a n d the b alance to be p a id in three eq ua l a nnu a l
ins t a llme n ts wit h i ntere s t at t he rat e of 8% on t h e un paid bal an ce
(31) DI STRICT 2
N\,\~ Oth er bu s iness and conununi cat.ions or supplement al agend a items
(31) Consideratjon of Resolutjon ~o . 78-101-2 , designating Distrjct agen~ re
SUPPLE~Ti:f(A~~GENDA app 1 ication for Disaster Relief Act ass:i stance for flood-caused damages
FI LE •.......•.••••.••• to Or ange and Olive Su b -Tru nks Sa nta J\na River Crossings. See page __ "_I_I _"_ ~~-~
A/C -TKLR (.32 ) DI STRICT 2
Con s id e ration of motion to adjour n ~·. 4 /
,_ jj ._BOARDS OF Dln ECTO RS
II
Pos t Off ic e Rox 8 127 C ou11iy S11 nifation Di stricts
of O ra nge County, Californ ia 10844 Elli s Avenue
Fountain Vall e y, Calif., 92708
T ele p hones:
JOINT BOARDS Areo Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
MAY lOJ 197 8 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DES IRI NG ADD ITI ONA L I NFORMAT I ON ON
ANY AGENDA I TEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD , IN ADDITION J STAFF
WILL BE AVA IL ABLE AT /:00 P.M. I MM EDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNE SDAY 'S MEETING I N THE CO NFER ENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRiCTS; BOARD RO OM,
(1) Pledge of /,ll egiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Recognjt~on of spe cial guests
(4) Conside ration of motion to receive and file minute exce rpts , if any .
See suppl ~mental a g enda
DI STRICTS 2 , 3, 5 , 6 , 7 & 11 i.n gs,
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEM ENTAL AGENDA
(4) Consid?rati?n.of motion_ to receiv~ and f i le minute excerpts from the
f o l l owing c1 t 1es regarding elections of mayors and appointment of
a l ternntes , and seatin g new members o f the Boards: (*Mayor)
Dist rict (s ) Ac t ive Alternate
An a heim 2 & 3 Dona ld Ro t h J~hn Seymou r *
Hu nt i n gton Beach 3 Ri ch a rd W. Siebert Ron Shenkman*
11 Ron Pattinson Ron Shenkman*
11 Ron Shen kma n * Ru th Bailey
Los Al amitos 3 Ch ar l es E . Sylv i a Kenn e t h Zonuni ck*
Newport Beach 5 Pa ul Ryckoff* Paul Humme l
5 Don a l d Strauss Paul Ryckoff*
6 Dona l d Mclnnis Paul Ryckoff*
7 Ray ll'i lli ams Paul Ry ck off*
Placentia 2 Dona l d A. Holt, Jr. William E. Rash f ord*
lbJ Ul. S 1: Tl. C"'C L. \N#PC>-c.. ·~-'\
(c) District 3 f ~ Gv FP.. .. ~A\,,d (d) Dj strict 5 c,~ f.J.L..,.
(e) Distrjct 6 wr"}i,, ... ;.., (~~~
(f) Di s tri c t 1 [~. LJ
(g) Di s trict. 11 1)LL.._ ~ ..... ,
(7 ) Appohi t ment of · Cli a i. rn•e n pro tern, if ne c c ~.sa r y
{8) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(9)
)lOll CALL VOTE._ ............. .
Joint Chairman (a)
(b) I. 1-f1 General Manager f\Jv--)t._ .. L-. •
(c) General Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
(J.;·e· L),;-r_ -. ( \'
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "0"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 5 -See page (s) "D"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "D"
DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE
(10) ALL DISTRICfS CONSENT CALENDAR
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous IJJJlot
ITEMS NOS, 10(A) THROUGH 10(EE)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business. ·
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appc3ring
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from s:Jmc.
-2-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Stephen E. Thorne, dated April 18, 1978, in the amount of
$5,131.00, for damages incurred in connection with a sewage
backup, and refer to the Districts' liability insurance
carrier for appropriate action
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted
by Abco Hardware & Builders Supply, Inc. in the amount of $878.30
against C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical
Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-23-3
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-80, amending Resolution
No. 78-36, approving plans and specifications for Warehouse
Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, authorizing a change in the
date for receipt of bids from April 27, 1978, to June 1, 1978.
See page "E"
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase of One (I) 3/4 Ton Cab &
Chassis, Specification No. A-089 (Rebid), to Santa Ana Dodge, Inc.
in the amount of $5,618.00. See page "F"
(e) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation and. awarding purchase of Three (3) One-Ton Cab &
Chassis, Specification No. A-091, to Theodore Robins Ford, in
the amount of $17, 276. 94. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-81, adopting revised Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, to conform with the 1978 legislation, as recommended
by the General Counsel. See pages "H" and "!"
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-82, authorizing execution of
Easement Deed to the City of Huntington Beach for slope encroachment on
30-foot utility corridor in connection with widening and improvements
of the Hamilton Street bridge crossing. See page "J"
(h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l,
authorizing an addition of $11,376.10 to the contract with
Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for miscellaneous paving improvements and
pipe supports, and granting a time extension of 65 calendar days
for completion of this work and due to inclement weather. See
page "K"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l,
authorizing a deduction of $1,323.74 from the contract with
Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. due to landscaping modification:5. See
page "L"
(j) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the
plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total
deduction of $3,515.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig,
Inc. See page "M"
(k) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-83, accepting Flood Wall and
Site Development for 75 MGD.Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-23-l, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement (Final
contract price: $2,279,868.08) See page "N"
{l) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-84, approving plans and
specifications for Modification of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet
Port at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-066, and authorizing
advertising for bids to be received on June 1, 1978. See
page "0"
DISTRICT 2
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing extension of the final date
for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental
Impact Report on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan, from
March 30, 1978, to June 9, 1978
(n) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
John J. Carusillo for annexation of .475 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country
Hill Road in the City of Anaheim; and Standard Resolution
No. 78-91-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex
said territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 31 -
Carusillo Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2)
See page "P"
{o) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
Anaheim Hills, Inc. for annexation of .755 acres of territory
to the District in the Anaheim Hills area, and refer to staff
for study and recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 32 -
Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 8 to County Sanitation District
No. 2) See page "0"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
{
(10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
\,,.,) DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-85-2, making a negative
declaration re Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, and
providing for notice thereof. See page "R"
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-86-2, approving plans and
specifications for Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: June 13, 1978). See
page "S"
(r) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-87-2, making a negative
declaration re Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20,
and providing for notice thereof. See page "T"
(s) Consideration of Resolution ·No. 78-88-2, approving plans and
specifications for Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date: June 13, 1978). See
page "U"
(t) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-89-2, authorizing acceptance
of Grant Deed from the City of Placentia for right of way
in connection with construction of the Richfield Sub-Trunk,
Contract No. 2-19, at no cost to the District. See page "V"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-90-2, authorizing execution
of Pipe Line License Agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway Company for right of way in connection with
construction of the Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19, and
the Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, ab at
t +t p· t: ·u. See page "W"
(
DISTRICT 3
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-92-3, making a negative
declaration re Westside Relief Force Main, Second Unit, Contract
No. 3-13-1, and providing for notice thereof. See page "X"
(w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7,
Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an addition of $7,983.00 to the
contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture, for construction
of a field closure, and granting a time extension of 5 calendar
days for completion of said work. See page "Y"
(x) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Progress Report
re Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, and
Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1.
See page "Z"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
{10) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(y) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-93, making a negative
declaration re Santa Ana River Siphon, and providing for
notice thereof. See page "AA"
DISTRICT 7
(z) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-94-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 43.21 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity southwesterly of the terminus of
Encanto Street and near the intersection of Cerritos Drive, in
the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 77 -Tract No. 5382
to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "BB"
(aa) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-95-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 9.010 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of Lemon Heights Drive between
Vista del Lago and La Cuesta, proposed Annexation No. 78 -Tract
No. 9688 to County Sanitatiqn District No. 7 (to also be annexed
to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "BB"
(bb) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-96-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex .784 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overhill,
proposed Annexation No. 79 -Medina Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance
District) See page "BB"
(cc) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-97-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 7.082 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity southeast of Santiago Canyon Road
and Jamestown Way in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 80 -
Tuact No. 9472 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "BB"
(dd) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-98-7, ordering
annexation of 10.02 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the southeast corner of Orange Park Boulevard and
Amapola Avenue in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 66 -
Tract No. 9687 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "BB"
DISTRICT 11
(ee) Consideration of items relative to construction of Warner Avenue
Relief Sewer -Phase II:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
the City of Huntington Beach, dated April 11, 1978, to
enter into an agreement with the District to design and
and construct a portion of the District's Master Plan sewers -
Warner Avenue Relief Sewer -Phase II. See page "CC"
(2) Consideration of motion declaring intent to enter into Standard
Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington
Beach for design and construction of Warner Avenue Relief Sewer -
Phase II.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
-6-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive
~ and file the Committee's written report
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Conunittee:
(a) Consideration of items re data processing report and reconunendation:
Consideration of motion to receive and file report and
recommendation of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. re data
processing (Copy enclosed with agenda material)
Consideration of motion approving recommendation of Peat,
Marwick, Mitchell & Co. to acquire an in-house mini-computer
system, and appoving action plan for installation of said system
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell·& Co., dated May 2, 1978, for design
of data processing system and vendor selection assistance, on
a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed
$49, 636 . 00. See page "DD"
(b) Consideration of items re solids handling facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1:
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to prepare plans
and specifications for Interim Solids Handling Facilitie? at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-067, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the bid date (Tentative date: 6/13/78)
and receive bids for said work
(2_.l/ Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to prepare plans
.//~ and specifications for Under-Drain System for Digester Cleaning
Beds at Reclamation Plant No. l, Job No. Pl-17, and authorizing
the General Manager to establish the bid date (Tentative
. . date: 7 /27 /78) and receive bids for said work
~Consideration of Resolution No. 78-100, adopting revised Conflict of
Roll Call Vote or Cast ·Interest Code and repealing Conflict of Interest Code adopted by
Unanimous Ballot Resolution No. 76-213 on December 8, 1976. See pages "EE" and "FF"
\..,I
(~Consideration of items re recommendation for liability and workers' 7' compensation self-insurance:
yr)
~
/ 9')
Consideration of motion to receive and file Fiscal Policy Committee
report and recommendation re liability and workers' compensation
self-insurance (Copy enclosed with Executive Committee Report)
Consideration of motion approving recommendation of Fiscal Policy
Committee and Executive Conunittee to implement a liability and
workers' compensation self-insurance program
Consideration of motion authorizing the staff and General Counsel
to proceed with plans an<l implementation of liability and workers'
compensation self-insurance program effective July 1, 1978
• (lll f' ALL DISTRICTS 7 D~s cu~sion re ~m~act of. J~rvis ~Gann Initiative
Districts ' official position, if a ny
/
(j#i ) ALL DIST IU CTS
and determin a tion of
I Coilsideration of motion to receive and file fin a ncia l report of Director
of Finan c e for nine-month p e riod endin g Marc h 31, 1978; a nd a pprovin g
recommend e d bud ge t transfe rs (Copy enclo sed with age nda mat e rial)
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other bu sin ess a nd commu n i c ations or supplement a l a ge nd a items
(1 6 ) {cc ton sidcration of motion approv ing 01ange Order No . 1 to t he plans a n d
ITEIAS ON specifications for purchase of On e (1) Bird JIB-64000 H-Series Ce n trifuge ,
suPPLEIAENT A LAG ENDA Specification No . E-088, a u t hori zing a deduct i on of $3,135.00 from t h e
purchase contract with 13ird Machine Company due to de l etion of belt
g uard and spring isolator set . See page "I"
(}~~f1"' ~. y. < .., \/-! c; ~ ..:, ~c. ~ ,.__~ ·~ )...., ·, ~ :>
(17) DISTRI CT 1 ° ., -} .. .,.,. " . /-\_ ~ · ,..... ~-lg -\o --z..
Oth er bu s iness and communications or supp l emental agenda ite ms , if any (r -c,. .) '2...-
(18) DISTR I CT 1
Conside ration of motion to adjourn
(1 9) DI STRICT 3
Other bu si ness and communications or supp l em e ntal agenda items , if any
(20 ) DI STR ICT 3
Conside ration of motion to ad journ ~·.1t
(21) DI STRICT 6
Ot h er bu s in e ss and communications o r suppl eme nt a l a g en d a ite ms , if any
(22) DISTRICT 6
Con s ide ration of motion to ad j ourn i ,\,
(23 ) DI0TRICT 7
Oth e r bu s iness and communications or supp l e ment a l a genda items , if an y
(24) DI ST RI CT 7
Con s ide ration of motion to adjou rn € 1~
(25 ) DISTRIC T 11
Oth er bu s ine s s a nd communi cations or supp l emen ta l agei1d a i t erns , if any
(26 ) DISTRICT 11
Con s ideration of motion to adjourn g · > '1
(27 )
(28)
(29 )
DIST RICT S
Con s ide ration of motion d es i gn a tin g A 1) • \ to serve as the
Director on th e Bo a rd o f t h e Ne\'Jport-Irv ine Wa ste -Managem e n t Planning
Agen cy (NIW A) and L 1
.1· a s t he Alte rn ate Director on said
Board \
DI STRICT S
Other bu s i n es s and communic a tions or s uppl e menta l agend a ite ms , if any
DISTRI CT S
Con s ide r a t i on o f mot i on t o adj ourn
-8 -
... .
(30) DISTRICT 2
Roll CaH Voto or Cast
11 -,nirnous Ballo t
Consi<lcration of items re proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills
Anne xation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (deferred from
April 12, 1978, Joint Meeting):
(a) Consideration of motion to receive a nd file staff report. See
page "GG 11
(b) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve deferment of
annexation acreage fees on approximately 53 acres of property
contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation
No. 7 to County Sanitation District No . 2 , subject to execution of
agreement between Anaheim Hill s , Inc. , City of Anaheim, County of
Orange , and the District, in form approved by the District's General
Counsel, providing for payment of said fees in the event the property
is later developed, at the rate in effect at the time of such
dev elopme nt
(c) Consideration of mo tion declaring int en t to approve agreement
between Anaheim Hills, Inc. and .the District, in form approved
by the District's General Counsel, providing for payment of
annexation fees on approximate ly 188 acres contained in proposed
Annexation No. 28 -Anahei1i; Hills Annexation No . 7 to County
Sanitation District No. 2, in equal annual installments over a
four-year period -1/4 to be p aid prior to initiation of annexation
procee dings and the b alan ce to be paid in three equal a nnu a l
installments with int erest at t h e rate of 8% on the unpaid bal ance
(31) DISTRICT 2
Other business and conununications or SUQP l emental agenda items
(31)
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEM ENTA L AGENDA
Consjderation of Reso lu tion No . 78-1 0 1-2 , designati n g Dis t rict agent re
app l ication for Disaster Relief Act assistance for flood-caused damages
t o Ora n ge and Ol ive Sub-Trun ks Santa An?. River Crossin g s. See page "lI "
(32) DISTRI CT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn i:tf.I
I
II ' BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8 I 27
II
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
MAY lOJ 1978 -7:30 P.M.
DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the
following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment of
alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor)
Anaheim
Huntington Beach
Lo s Alamitos
Newport Beach
Placentia
ALL DI STRICTS
District(s)
2 & 3
3
11
11
3
5
5
6
7
. 2
Active Alternate
Donald Roth ~ John Seymour*
Richard W. Siebert
Ron Pattinson
Ron Shenkman*
Charles E. Sylvia
Paul Ryckoff*
Donald Strauss
Donald Mcinnis
Ray Williams
Donald A. Holt, Jr.
Ron Shenkman* ·
Ron Shenkman*
Ruth Bailey
Kenneth Zommick*
Paul Hununel
Paul Ryckof f*
Paul Ryc kof f*
Paul Ryckof f*
William E. Rashford *
(16) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to the plans and
specifications for purchase of On e (1) Bird HB-64000 H-Seri es Centrifuge ,
Specification No. E-088, authorizing a deduction of $3,135.00 from the
purchase contrac t with Bird Machine Company due to delet ion of belt
guard and spring isolator set. See page "I"
DISTRIC T 2
(31) Consideration of Res olution No. 78-101-2, designating District agent re
application for Di sas t e r Re lief Act assistan ce for flood-caused damage s
to Oran ge and Olive Sub-Trunks Santa Ana River Crossings. See page "II"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 -1084~ ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_/_A~~~--~~--~
C.O. NO. ____ l ____ ~------~-----
:r Bird Machine Co. --~---·--C.ON= RACTOR: ·oATE~-·~-----_A_p_r_i_l~2_7_, __ 1_9_7_8 __ ~--
I
~~~~~~~~~--~--~--~~
JOB: PURCHASE OF BIRD CENTRIFUGE, SPECIFICATIONS NO. E-088
.
Amount of this Change Order }(~HLl)C (DEDUCT) $ (3,135.00)
In accordance with contract.provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compens~tion therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Supplier's letter dated April 4, 1978.
DEDUCT:
Delete belt guard and spring isolator set
from the Purchase Contract. Districts can
furnish this equipment in the upcoming.
installation contract for less money.
1 Belt Guard
1 Set Korfund Spring Isolators
TOTAL DEDUCT
No time extension this change order.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change ~15) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
$
$
$
$
$2,097.00
.1, 038. 00
$3,135.00
210,975.00
o.oo
(3,135.00)
207,840.00
Board authorization date: May 9, 1978 Approved:
·By ----------------
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange Co~nty, California
By _______________________ __
II I'' AGENDA ITEM #16 -ALL DISTRICTS
Chief Engineer
II 111
.....
RESOLUTION NO. 78-101-2
DESIGNATING DISTRICT AGENT RE APPLICATION FOR
DISASTER RELIEF ACT ASSISTANCE
A RESOLUTION OF 1HE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING DISTRICT AGENT
RE APPLICATION FOR DISASTER RELIEF ACT ASSISTANCE
FOR FLOOD-CAUSED DAMAGES TO ORANGE AND OLIVE
SUB-TRUNKS SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSINGS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. '!hat Fred A. Harper, General Manager, is he!eby authorized to
execute for and in behalf of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this
application and to file it in the appropriate State office for the purpose of
obtaining certain Federal financial assistance under the Disaster Relief Act
(Public Law 288, 93rd Congress) or otherwise available from the President's
Disaster Relief Fund; and,
Section 2. '!bat County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, a
public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby
authorizes its agent to provide to the State and to the Federal Disaster
Assistance Administration (FDAA), Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) for all matters pertaining to such Federal disaster assistance the assurances
and agreements indicated on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
·11 11-1" AGENDA ITEM #31 -DISTRICT 2 "11-1"
.; '
·r
ASSU HANCt:)
A. The State agrees to take any neres~ry action within State capabilities to require compliance with these assurances an71 al;ree-~
mcnts by the applicant or to assume responsibility to the Federal government for any deficiencies not resolved to t!Ie "S.itiF'
faction of the Regional Director.
The Applicant Certifies: . . v
B. That (to the best of his knowledge and belief) the disaster relief work described on each FederaJ Disaster Assistance Admin·
istration (FDAA) Project Application for which Federal financial assistance is requested is eligible in accordance with the
criteria contained in 24 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2205, and applicable FDAA (HUD) Handbooks.
C. That it is the legal entity responsible under Jaw for the performance of the work detailed or accepts such responsibility.
D. That the -emergency or disaster relief work therein described for which Federal assistance is requested hereunder does not or will
not duplicate benefits received for ~he same Joss from another source. ·
E. That all information given by it herein is, to the best of its knowledge and belief. true and correct.
·'
F. That all financial assistance received under this application will be, or has been, expended in accordance with applicable law and
regulations thereunder.
The Applicant Agrees:
G. To (1) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessazy for accomplishment of the ap-
proved work; (2) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the approved work or Federal funding.
H. -To comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) and all requir~ments imposed by the Federal Disaster As-
sistance Administration pursuant to that Title to the end that,.. in accordance with Title VI of that Act and the Regulation, no
person in the United States shall; on the ground of race, color, religion, nationality, sex, age, or economic status, be excluded
from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any pr-ogram or activity for
which the Applicant received Federal financial assistance from FDAA and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will i~di
ately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.
I. That if any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to ·
the Applicant by the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant, or in the case of any
transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for
which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
• If any personal property is so provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which it retains owner-
.ship or possession of the property. In all other cases, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which the
Federal financial assistance is extended to it by FDAA.
J. That this assurance is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans. reimburse-
ments, advances, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Ap·
plicant by FDAA, that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the representations and agreements made
in this assurance and that the United States shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance. This assurance is
binding on the Applicant, its successors, transferees, and assignees, and the person or persons whose signatures appear on the re-
verse are authorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Applicant. ·
K. To obtain and-maintain any flood insurance as may be required for the life of the project(s) for which Federal financial assist-
ance for acquisition or construction purposes for buildings or mobile homes is provided herein; and, to obtain and maintain any
other insurance as may be reasonable, adequate and necessary to protect against further loss to any property which was replaced,
restored, repaired or constructed with this assistance.
L That, as a condition for the grant, any repairs or construction financed herewith, shall be in accordance with applicable
standards of safety, decency :md sanitation and in conformity with applicable codes, specifications and standards; and, to
evaluate the natural hazards in areas in which the proceeds of the grant or loan are to be used and take appropriate action '-1)
to milii;ate such hazards, including safe land use and construction practices.
M. To defer funding of any projects involving flexible funding under Section 402 or Section 419 until FDAA makes a favorable
environmental c1carance determination, if this is required.
"11-2" AGENDA ITEM #31 EXHIBIT "A" DISTRICT 2 "11-2"
-
MANAGER 'S AGENDA REP ORT
County Sa nit a tio n Distr icts
o f Ora n ge Co u nt y , Cal ifo rn ia
JO INT BOARDS
Regu l a r Meeting
Ma y 10, 1978 -7:30 p.m .
Pos t Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fou ntain Vo l l ey, Calif., 92708
T clcphcncs:
Arco Code 7 14
540-29 10
962-241 1
The following is a brief explanation of the more i mportant ,
non-routin e items which appear on the enc los ed agenda a nd wh ich
are not otherwise self -exp l a n atory. Warrant list s are enclosed
with the agenda material summarizing th e bil l s p ai d since the l ast
Joint Board mee ting.
To min imize th e am ount of redundanc y and duplication i n the
a genda material and reduce the numb e r of commen t s in the Manager 's
Report, we h ave expanded the description of the agenda it ems in
the agenda itself, particu l a rly with rega rd to chang e or ders and
contracts which h ave been publicly bid and are within the contract
budg et or engin eer's esti ma te. Detailed change orders are included
in the supporting materia l as well as the bid tabula tions for the
con tracts being re coTi1ITiended for award.
Joint Boards
No . 4 -Seating of New Directors.
Our office is currently being advised of recent e l ections of
new mayors, appointm ents of a l ternates to the mayors, and other new
Dire ctors. A list of Directors and alternates compiled from infor-
ma tion rec e i ved to d ate will be available at the meet ing .
No . 6 -An nual Elect ion of Districts' Chairmen .
I n accordance with the Districts ' stand a rd procedures, a
Ch a irman for eac h Distr ict Boa~d is e lected annually at the May
me e ting. Th e Joint Chairman a r.d Vi ce Joint Chairman are elected in
July, following nomin a t ion s at the June meeting.
The officers for the past year were as follows:
District No . Ch airma n Vic e Chairman
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
James Sharp
City of Tustin
Henry Wedaa
Cit y of Yorba Linda
Bernie Svalstad
City of Fountain Valley
Don Mcinnis
City of Newport Beach
Kenn Rima
Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist.
Pete Barrett
City of Newport Beach
Ron Pattinson
City of Huntington Bch.
Philip Anthony
Board of Supervisors
Don E . Smith
City of Orange
Donald Hudson
City of Cypress
Thomas F. Riley
Board of Supervisors
Paul Ryckof f
City of Ne wport Beach
Bil l Vardoulis
City of Irvine
Ron Sh enkman
City of Huntington Bch.
An up-to-date list of Direc tors by District will be includ ed in
t h e Directors' fo l ders Wednesday evening .
For the information of the new Directors, the Dis tricts' reg ula -
tions provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of
the Executive Committee which ordinarily meets monthly at the call
of the Joint Chairman . This Committee also includes the Joint Chairman,
Vice Joint Chairman, and a representative of the County Board of Super-
visors. Its function is to study and make recormnendations to the
Joint Boards concerning Joint Districts' matters, such as, budgets,
salaries, personnel, policies , etc .
No . 10-f -Adopting Revisions to CEQA.
Recent l y, the Stat e has adopted amendments to the "State Environ -
mental Impact Report Guidelines. These amendments went into effect
on March 4 , 1978. It is requested that all public agencies amend
their guide lines to reflect these chang es within 60 days of thi s
amendm en t. Th e amendments include the fol lowing major chan g es:
1 . Tim e l imits are identified for actions under
CEQA .
2. Coordination is required with Federal agencies.
3. A l ead agency is required to undertake detai l ed
consultation with responsib l e agencies .
4 . Procedur es required of a responsible agency are
more clearly identified.
-2-
5. Responsible agencies would be required to
us e the Environmenta l I mpact Report or
Negative Dec l aration prepared by the lead
agency for the project in question.
6 . Environmental Impact Report and Negative
Decl aration for projects identified as
bein8 of statewide significance would be
required to be sent to the State for
review.
The staff and General Counsel have reviewed these chan g es and
recommend adoption and incorporation into the Districts' guidelines.
No. 10-g -Granting of Slope Easement to the City of Hunting ton
Beach.
Recent l y, the City of Huntington Beach has completed the widening
a nd i mprovement of the Hamilton Street Bridg e Crossing of the S a nta
Ana River. This bridg e improvement has nec e ssitgted a s l op e encroach -
ment on the Districts' 30 -foot utility corridor which extends be tween
Plants Nos. 1 and 2 adjacent to the west l ev e e of the S a nta Ana Riv e r.
The City has requested a slope easement to ma inta in the Flood Control's
access to the River which was interrupted by the bridg e improvement.
The staff r e commends g ranting of this s l ope easement which is
approximate l y 600 square f e et (50 ' x 12') to the City of Hunting ton
Beach .
No. 10-h , i, j -Clo seout of Contract No. P2-23-l .
Thi s contract for the F l ood Wa ll and Site Development is a part
of the 75 -MGD Improved Treatment at P l ant No. 2. Th e three change
orders are for misce ll aneous items concluding the work on this g rant-
funded project. These three chang e orders alter the r ev ised contract
amount by a deduction of $3,680 .69 and extend the contr a ct an addi-
tional 65 cal e ndar days revising the contract completion date to
May 9, 1978.
CHA NGE ORDER NO. 7. This change order is for an addition
of $11,376.10 for additional paving r e quired around t he
Districts' construction office trail e r complex, r e visions
to t h e structura l pavin g sections at the Bushard and
Banning entrances and revisions to pip e supports in the
tunnels a nd digester cleaning bed are a s.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 8. This change orde r deducts $1 ,323.74
from the contrac t for credit for vari at ions of th e qu a ntities
and size of trees furnish e d a l ong the berm behind th e flood
wall surrounding the Plant. There is additional cost on
this change order for soi l amendments to the soil used in
the planting areas because of th e high a lkal ine content
-3-
ana lyz e d in the so il s used for planting purposes along
with additions to the sprinkler irriga tion system.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 9. This change order is a deduction or $3,515 fo r adjustment of the engineer 's quantities
for overexcavation , additional pavin g and deletion of
compacted fill adjacent to th e Santa An a River channel
roadway. These qu a ntity adjustments are at the unit
pric es stipulated in the bid documents .
No.10 -k -Acceptance of Job No. P2 -23-l as Compl ete.
Pascal & Ludwi g, Inc ., the contractors for the Flood Wa l l an d
Site Deve lopment which i s a portion of the 75-MGD o f I mproved Treat -
ment at P lant No. 2, h as satisfactorily completed a ll of the con -
trac tu a l work and h as complied with the p rov isions of the cont r act
documents. This contract h as extended for an addit i ona l 1 77 calendar
days which have be e n mainly attributed to the i nc l ement weather sus -
tained in the first three months of 197 8. The fina l amended contract
price is $14 ,963 g re ater than the origina l p ric e o f $2 ,268,420 (less
than one percent of the origina l contract amoun t).
The sta ff recommends acceptance of the work and the filin g of a
Notice of Completion for t h e project.
No. 10-1 -Approva l of Plans and S pe cificati ons for Modification
of Existing Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Re c lamat i o n Plant No. 1 -
Job No . PW -066.
The staff h as prepared the pla ns and specifications for mo d ifi -
ca tion of the slud ge h opper outlet ports at Plant No. 1. This job
is desi gned to mod i fy t he existing sludge hoppers to improve the water
tightness of th e s lu dge bins to abate a nuis ance in thi s area and to
improve the sludge storage and han d lin g facilities. This is a $20,000
budge ted item.
Th e staff recommends approva l of the p l ans and specifications
for bids to be received on June 1, 1978 .
District No. 2
No . 10-n -Ini tiation of An n exation Proceeding s -Annexation
No . 3 1 -John and Agnes Carusillo.
We are in r ecei pt of a request to annex a 1/2 acre single
r es ide n tial p a r ce l loc ated on Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim.
The staff is requ estin g ini tia tion of annexation proceedings s ince
this p ar ticular parcel ha s been of some concern to the City of
An a h e i m, as we ll as the County He a lth Depa rtment. Th e e x istin g
re sidence cesspool system h as f a iled , causing a hea lth hazard on th e
-4-
p a r ce l and o n adjacent proper t i es. Th is r esiden ti a l parce l con-
f o rms to t h e Di str i ct 's Maste r P l a n fo r l a nd u se and al l ne ce ssary
f ees h ave b een p a i d.
The s t a ff r ecomme n ds adop tio n of Reso lution No. 78-9 1 -2 .
We are r equesting approva l of the plans and specifications for
th e Ri chfie l d Road and Kel l ogg (Orchard) Drive Subtrunks wh ich extend
fr om the Santa Ana River I nterceptor in La Palma to Or a n ge thorpe
Av enue. These two subtrunks are a p art of t he District 's Master P l an
f a cil ities which are designed to r elieve t he Atwood Sub trunk in Oran g e -
thorpe Avenue, d i verting the f l ows i nto the Santa Ana Ri ver I ntercep tor
in La Palma Avenue. The Richfield Interceptor consists of approxi -
mately 3 ,000 feet of 42 -inch sewer wh ich is estimated to cost $450,000.
The Kellogg (Orchard) Subtrunk consists of approximately 2,000 feet of
27-i nch sewer which is estimated to cost $204,0 00. It is propos ed
t hat both projects be bid concurrently which would give a contractor
t h e option of bidding on both projects or each project separately,
depending upon his work loads and financial c apabiliti es. We exp ec t
b i ds for t hese two subtrunks to be received on Tuesday, June 13, and
s u bmitted to t h e Board for their c onsiderati o n at the June 1 4 Board
meeting .
No. 1 0-t,u -Acceptance of Grants of Ea sement for the Construction
o f the Richfield and Kellogg Subtrunks .
Both t he Ke l logg (Orch ard) and Richf i eld Subt r unks must cross the
Atchison, Topeka and Santa F e Rai l way Company's right of way southerly
of Orange thorpe Avenue to connect to the Atwood Subt r unk . The Railway
Company has executed a license agreement for acceptance by the District .
Th is l icense agreem en t contains requirements for the protecti on of the
rail road t racks and is offered for $300 to the District .
The Richfield Subtrunk must cross a portion of the Atwood Park
owned b y the City of Placentia. This alignment, which i s behind the
si dewa l k area , is necessary to avo i d two 1 8 -i nch water l ines, a
26-inch water line and a 27 -inc h storm drain which are a ll located
wi t h in the street right of way. The City has executed a sewer easement
a t no cost to the District .
District 3
No. 1 0 -v -Approval of Negative Declarat i on for Westside F orce
Ma i n, S e cond Unit.
Th e staff h as prepared an initia l an d a Ne g ative Dec l arat i on for
the instal l ation of the second uni t of t h e Westside Force Mai n which
extends easterl y from the Sea l Beach Pumping St a tion at Sea l Beach
Bo ul evard along Westminster Boulevard to Ra n cho Street in the City of
-5 -
Westminster. It is contemplated that this mas ter planned work will
be done this summer to provide the required reliability in the event
of failure of the existing sing l e forc e ma in. Pu~suant to the Dis-
trict 's Guidelines Impl eme nting the Califo rni a Environmental Quality
Act, the staff ha s advertised the propo se d project and has received
no inqu i ry r egarding the projec t . Th erefore , i t is r ecommen ded that
the Negative Decl ara tion be approved and certified.
No. 10-w -Ch ange Ord er No. 3 to Co ntract No. 3 -20 -3 .
The last con tr act of the Knott In terceptor, Contract No.
3-20-2, terminated approx i mately 200 feet northerly of Lin co ln Aven u e.
A plain en d joint of pipe was installed , n ot knowing at that time
the pipe supplier for the present contract, and the type of pipe to
be supplied. In joining t h e two contracts toget her, it was n ecessary
to make a field closure to join the t wo ends of pip e supplied o n the
two contracts. The contr acto r h as s ubmitted a detailed cost b reak -
down of the closure req uire d a nd the staff recommends acceptance of
Ch ange Order No. 3 in the total amount of $7,983 for this work.
Districts 5 and 6
No. 1 0 -y -Approva l of Negat i ve Dec l aration for Second Barrel
of Siphon at Santa Ana River Crossing .
The staff has prepared an initial study and a Negative Declara-
tion to evaluate the e nvironmenta l i mpacts associate d with the con-
struction of a 33-inch s i phon across the Santa Ana River bed n orther l y
of Pacific Co ast Highway . It is contemplat ed that th e work wou l d be
don e in the fall of this year to coincide with the Flood Control
Di st ri c t's contract for the wid en in g and improvements of the S anta
Ana River. Pur suant to t h e Di stric ts ' Guidelines Imp leme ntin g t h e
Ca lifor nia Envi ronmenta l Qua lity Act, the staff h as advert i se d t h e
propose d project and h as r ece ived no inquiry regarding the proj e ct.
Therefo r e, i t i s recommended that t h e Negat ive Declaration b e approved .
District 7
No. 10-z -Ini t i at ion of An n exat i on No. 77 -Tract No. 538 2.
Th e Board referred to the staff a requ est for annexation of 43.21
acres loc ate d southerly of Santiago Ca n yon Road at the te rmin u s of
Enc a nto Street n ear the intersection of Cerritos Drive in the City of
Ora n ge . Th e prop s oed a nn exation includes 22 residential lot s and one
op e n s pace lo t. The staff has reviewed the ann exation a nd recommends
that the Board a d opt Res o l ution No. 78-94-7 init ia t i n g proc ee dings for
this p roposed a nnexation.
No. 10-aa -Ini t i at ion of Annexation Proceed ings -Ann exat i o n
No. 78 -Tr act No. 9688.
The Board referred to the staff a request for a nn exa tion of 9 .010
-6-
acres in the vicinity of Lemon Heig hts Drive between Vi sta del Lago
a n d La Cues t a in the unincorporated territory of the County . The
propon e nt s pro posed to develop the a r ea into ten residential lot s
which is in conformity with the Di strict 's l and use plan. The l oca l
sewering agency for this proposed area will be the 70th Sewer Ma in-
t e n a nce Di s trict . The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No .
78 -95 -7 initiating proceedings.
No . 9 -bb -Initiation of An n exation Proc eedin gs -Annexation
No. 79.
The Board r eferre d t o th e staff a request of Mr. and Mrs. Roy
G. Medina to annex 0.784 acres of a single -family residentia l lot
located in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overhjll Road in the
Lemon Heights area of the unincorporated portion of the County.
The local sewering agency for this parce l will be the 70th Sewer
Maintenance District. Th e staff re commends that the Board adopt
Re solution No. 78-96-7 initiating proceedings.
No . 10-cc -I nitiation of Ann exation Proceedings -Annexat i on
No . 80.
At the April meeting, the Board referred to the staff a requ es t
for annexation of approximately 7 .082 acres in the vicinity south-
east of Santiago Canyon Road and J amestown Way in the City of Orange.
This proposed annexation wil l contain thirteen 10,000 square foot
lo ts and four 1 /2 acre lo ts which is in conformity with the District 's
land use plan of development.
The staff recommends that the Board ado pt Resolution No . 98-97 -7
initiating annexation proceedings.
No .1 0-dd -Ordering Annexat i on No. 66.
This proposed annexation contains 10.02 acres in the v icinity
of Orange Park Boulevard and Amapo l a Avenue in the City of Orange .
The proponents have paid all the applicable fees and LAFCO has
approved this annexat ion which wi l l be deve l oped as single -fami l y
r esidences in conformity to the District 's Master Plan . The staff
recommend s adoption of Resolution No. 78-98 -7 ordering this annexa -
tion .
District No. 11
No. 10-ee -Considerat ion o f Re imbursement for Master Plan Sewers
in the City of Huntin gton Beach .
The District is in receipt of a letter from the Ci ty of Huntington
Beach requesting consideration of the District and the City entering
into a Reimbursement Agre emen t for the design and construction of a
p ortion of the Master Plan facilities in Warner Avcuue . Because of
-7 -
increas in g sewage flows in the west e rly p ortion of the City, th e City
staff is r equ es tin g that they proceed wi th th e installation of th e
Warne r Avenue Re li ef Sewer , Pha s e II prior to the District 's 19 8 1-82
schedul e fo r this p ro j ect .
Th e staff r ecomme nds that the Board decl a r e its int en t to e nter
into a standard Reimbursement Agreement with th e City. The Agreement
will be broug ht to the Board for the i r approva l upon det e rmination
of th e final p r oj ec t co s t. Our Master Plan es tjmate for this project
is $250 ,000.
All Di stricts
Nos. 1 2 and 13 -Re port of the Execu tiv e Comm ittee .
Th e Commi ttee met on April 26th and enclosed for Board member s
is a writ ten report of their discu ss i ons and re commende d actions for
c onsideration by t he Boards.
No. 1 4. -Discussion of Impact of J arv i s/Gann In i tiative .
At the April Joint meeting, the Boards conducted a br ief dis -
cu ssion r eg a rding the Jarvis/Gann initiative . At that time , the
General Counsel advised that he wou l d prepare a re s o l utio n if t he
Bo ar d s wishes to adopt an officia l posit ion .
Since the staff h as not r 0 ce ived specific instruct i ons, this
matter has been pl aced on t h e agenda i n the event the Boards wish
t o s tate a position .
No. 15 -Financia l Report for the Nine -Month Period Ended
March 31, and Recommended Bud g et Trans f ers
Includ ed with the agend a p acke t i s th e Financ i al Report of the
Di r ector of Financ e . I f a ny Board member has any que stions or wi s hes
a dditi onal information p l ease ca ll Wayne Syl ves t e r or Fred Harper
(714) 540 -29 10.
Di s trict 5
No. 27 -Appo i ntment of Director and Alternate Director for the
Ne ·wport-I rvine Wast e .M a n agerne.nt Planning Agency (NIWA) .
As a r es ult of changes in the Di strict 5 Bo a rd membership, it
will b e n ecessar y that a Director and alternate Director be appointed
to serve on th e Board of Director s of NI WA .
-8 -
District 2
No. 30 -Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hill s.
Thi s matter was deferred from the Apri l 12 Board meet i ng
because of concern that the proposed annexation may involve the
Cities of Anaheim and Orange. Th e Districts' staff has determined
that the proposed annexation is north erly of Anaheim Hills ridgeline
and is entirely within Anaheim 's zone of influence.
Enclo sed in the a8enda supporting documents is a brief staff
report and map indicating the boundaries of the Cities of An a heim
and Orange in relation to the ridgeline. The staff recommends that
the actions appearing in the agenda be approved. This is an annexa -
tion of 241 acres with deferred payment for 53 acres of permanent
open space which will be dedicated to the Coun ty of Orange.
In addition, the proponents wish to spread the payment of
current annexat ion fees ($254,472.09) on the balance of 188 acres
over a four-year period.
Fred A. Harper
Genera l Manager
-9-
/
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
of Orange County, California
May 2, 1978
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months
Ended March 31, 1978
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714)962-2411
Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the
nine months ended March 31, 1978, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of
June 14, 1972.
The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and
the individual Districts for the first three quarters of the 1977-78 fiscal
year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined
1977-78 budgets for all Districts is $120.2 million, of which approximately
85% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions,
including reserves for said capital projects. The average budgeted revenue
and expense categories of the several Districts compared with last year are
as fol lows:
(In Millions of Dollars)
% of Increase % of
REVENUE 1976-77 Budget 1977-78 (Decrease) Budget
Carry-Over & Construe-
tion Reserves $ 52. 1 53.0% $ 73.4 $ 21.3 61. 1%
Tax Revenue 20.8 21. 1 21.4 .6 17 .8
Federal & State
Construction Grants 10.2 10.3 13.2 3.0 11.0
Fees 2. 1 2.2 3.9 1.8 3.2
Sale of Capacity
Rights 1.2 7.3 .7 (6.5) .6
Interest & Other
Income 5.8 6. 1 7.6 1.8 6.3
Total Funds Available $ 98.2 100.0% $120.2 $ 22.0 100.0%
(In Millions of Dollars)
% of % of
EXPENDITURES 1976-77 Budget 19'77-78 (Decrease) Budget
District Construction
Programs $ 48.5 49.3% $ 41.2 $ (7.3) 34.3%
Joint Works Construction
Programs 34.4 35.0 60.8 26.4 so.6
Debt Retirement &
Interest 3.7 3.8 3.6 (. 1) 3.0
Joint Operating
Expense s.o 5. 1 6.8 1.8 5.7
District Maintenance,
Operating & Other
Expenditures 6.6 6.8 7.8 1.2 6.4
Total Expenditures $ 98.2 100.0% $120.2 $ 22.0 100.0%
Included in each Districts' statement is a summary of the above major income and
expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects
and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves
and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said state-
ments as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations.
As part of the Revenue Program Phase I study, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.,
Districts' auditor and Revenue Program consultant, has reviewed our EDP require-
ments to assure maximum utilization consistent with cost-effectiveness. A
separate report and recommendation to install an in-house mini-computer to
enhance the Districts' capabilities in controlling costs and assist in complying
with Revenue Program requirements is scheduled for consideration by the Joint
Boards at their May meeting.
Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained within
their respective budget allocations, however, because of developments which
could not be fully anticipated when budgets were adopted, budget transfers in
certain categories will be necessary. The transfers, which are described in
this report and summarized on the last page, are recommended.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The
statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district
cash transactions for fiscal 1977-78 which were accrued in 1976-77 are not
reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning
the report, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience.
CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Earned interest from our continuing program of investing reserve funds
(primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage
facilities) is $3.7 million. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in
short-term government securities or time deposits, and presently a substantial
amount is with the County Treasurer~ commingled investments to take advantage
of the currently higher yield. These interest earnings effectively reduce the
tax rate by ]. 1 cents.
-2-
-..
JOINT OPERATING FUND
·"-"" This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities
relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities.
Salaries and Wages -Because of presently authorized but unfilled positions,
it is anticipated that salary and benefit increases approved in December·
will be funded from current year payroll savings. The total budget
allocation will be more than sufficient to carry through the fiscal year
and, in fact, provide funds for certain recommended budget transfers
described below.
Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement (see additional comments re
Retirement under Prior Year's Expense below), Workers' Compensation (see
comments below under insurance), Group Medical Insurance, Uniforms, and
Unemployment Insurance coverage which became effective January 1, 1978.
Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -Expenses are rising sharply since placing new
activated sludge treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 into service. The
two 1500 horse power engines can use.up to 900 gallons a day of diesel
fuel depending on the availability of digester gas. The cost of initially
filling the Pl-16 fuel tanks (which was previously authorized by the Boards)
and "shakedown" engine testing on diesel fuel until the system began to
generate digester gas will require a $40,000 budget transfer from the
salaries and wages account for this line item.
Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is gen-
erally during the first quarter. Significant premium increases experienced
by our Districts and throughout the governmental sector continue to occur,
however, current year expenses are well within the budget. The Fiscal
Policy Committee has been studying the feasibility of self insurance for
liability and workers' compensation. Their report and recommendation will
be submitted to the Boards for consideration at the May meeting~
Office Expense -Allocation is more than adequate to complete the fiscal
year.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treat-
ment plant sites. A new chlorine contract was awarded in December at a
unit price decrease of $2.60 per ton. New scrubbing system is not yet
in service, therefore, the budget appropriation will be adequate.
Chemical Coagulants -Expenditures for this item are increasing to maintain
compliance with NPPES permit requirements, yet are presently well within the
budget allocation. There will be substantial funds to carryover and apply
to next year's budget requirements from this account.
Other Operating Supplies -Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners,
janitorial, lab supplies, tools, etc. No budget transfers need be con-
sidered for these accounts.
Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge and grit hauling
and EDP services. Sludge hauling costs will increase as a result of price
escalation and increased volume from new activated sludge facilities but
should be sufficient through June 30th.
-3-
-.
Professional Services -Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees,
audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Budget includes ~
Revenue Program Implementation (Phase II) required by SWRCB and EPA
which has been delayed pending publication of new regulations promul-
gated by recent amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
This work is ·being rebudgeted for next f i sea 1 year. (Al so see comments under
Federal and State Construction Grants item.)
Printing and Publications -Continuing demand by the public for information
on District activities, coupled with "paper work" required by other agencies
and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend.
Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment
necessary for removing and replacing equipment and other necessary work
during the course of maintenance and repair operations.
Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities.
Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item.
Generally this account runs very tight due to the unpredictability of major
equipment failures. Recently, a major repair and maintenance job on
centrifuge equipment (this is high maintenance equipment used in solids de-
watering) was completed that will push this item considerably over budget.
Therefore, a $50,000 budget transfer from Salaries and Wages is necessary.
Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern
California Coastal Water Research Project has been paid. and expense to
date includes estimated allocations for the first three quarters of 1977-78.
Budget also includes funds for operational research and evaluation of pro-~
cesses to develop optimum operating parameters. Several operational
research projects have been delayed and will be rebudgeted for next year.
Travel, Meeting & Training -This item has increased for required travel
of directors and staff re efforts to amend PL 92-500, but the budget appears
sufficient.
Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased
electrical power, which has increased substantially in the past few years
due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A
portion is from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are
placed into service. As the activated sludge facilities are phased into
service at Plant No. 1 this item will increase dramatically. This was
anticipated at budget time and it appears as if costs will be within the
budget.
Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere.
Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating
or non-operating account balance from the previous year. Pursuant to
approval by the Boards in 1976 the Districts transferred from Public
Employees Retirement System (PERS) to Orange County Employees Retirement
System (OCERS). The change resulted in a 25% reduction in the Districts•
current cost. However, in accordance with the terms of the transfer
the Districts were to assume any accumulated liability under OCERS in ~
excess of funds transferred from PERS. The liability was unknown when
-4-
budgets were adopted and were, therefore, excluded with a provision th~t
any 1iabi1ity could be funded from Unappropriated Reserve. The adjusted
amount has now been determined to be $228,587. In addition, corrected
prior year billings from Edison Company for plant power and other
miscellaneous entries have been charged to this account in the total
amount of $90,232. Therefore, a budget transfer to this account from
Salaries and Wages in the amount of $321,000 will be necessary.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts'
jointly-owned treatment and disposal· facilities and represents an average of
51% (including reserves) of each individual Districts' budget requirements for
1977-78. During the first nine months, $6.6 million was expended on joint works
treatment and disposal facilities expansion, primarily on the Activated Sludge
Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, up to 87.5% of which
will be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected
in the financial statements of the respective Districts.
INDlVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for
the seven Districts and include each respective Districts' share of the Joint
Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes -Approximately 57% of the 1977-78 property taxes have been apportioned
through December 31st.
Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant Funds received
during the period amount to $2.3 million, mostly on joint works (CORF)
projects. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87.5% of
11 approved 11 treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that
payments will be limited to 80% of the grant amount until an acceptable
revenue program is adopted. The Boards are aware that our Districts, along
with other large sewering agencies across the nation, vigorously supported
legislation to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad
valorem taxes for user charges which would result in a substantial overhead
cost savings to the Districts' taxpayers. In December, the law was amended
to allow ad valorem taxes on residential and some commercial establishments.
While this provision will partially relieve the burden of levying use charges
and billing users of Districts' services, implementation of the Revenue
Program by July, 1979 will be a monumental task, at best. Phase I (Revenue
Program Document) of the program which was commissioned by the Boards last
year is near completion, however, it must now be modified to incorporate
the ad valorem provisions as allowed by the recent amendments. Phase I I
(detailed design and implementation) was recently approved by the Boards.
However, upon recommendation of the State Water Resources Control Board,
we are presently delaying the completion of Phase I and commencement of
full work on Phase II to avoid duplication of effort pending issuance of
new user charge regulations by EPA which will apparently relax the grant
payment restrictions on existing projects. Further, passage of the
Jarvis-Gann initiative will affect the Districts user charge structure.
When these issues are resolved, the stops will be pulled out and we will be
able to proceed with completion of the program. Staff is keeping the
Executive Committee apprised of this work.
Fees -With the exception of Districts 1 and 6, all Districts now have a sewer
connection fee schedule in affect. This account also includes industrial
waste use charges levied by all seven Districts pursuant to the Uniform
-5-
-.
Industrial Waste Ordinance and annexation fees. Collections to date are
generally exceeding or running very close to budget except in Districts t 1 5 and 11. District No. 11 has not yet received a transmittal of funds ~
collected by the city since the ordinance went into effect on September
9' 1977.
Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists primarily of interest income,
various fees, and sale of capacity rights. Budget amounts are adjusted
for certain accruals as noted above. All Districts but No. 1 are running
ahead of budget.
District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan
construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1977-78 budget (including
reserves for long range construction program) for this item is 34% for the
seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs
of Districts 2, 3 and 11. Itemization of each project is included on the
lower portion of each Districts' financial statement. The total expenditures
for the seven Districts during the first six months was $710,000.
Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint
treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund. This account also includes accumulated construction
reserves for expansion of treatment facilities to comply with PL 92-500.
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on
outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual
expense for all Districts is approximately $2.2 million.
Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and
maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and adminis-
trative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each Districts'
respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details).
District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual
Districts' general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair
of the respective Districts' collection systems. Last year the County
Treasurer implemented a banking fee to cover their cost of handling commingled
investments which have been accounted for in each Districts' operating fund.
They can now provide us with the information to allocate the commingled
interest earnings and banking fee to the appropriate fund rather than
accounting for all activity within the operating fund. It would, therefore,
be appropriate to establish budget accounts in each of the funds and transfer
appropriations accordingly to accomodate the accounting for this item.
District No. 2's pumping has increased substantially requiring a transfer
of funds from the Pump Station Maintenance to the (pump station) Utility
account. Districts 7 and 11 experienced major pumping equipment failures
this year and a budget transfer will be necessary to the Pump Station.Main-
tenance Accounts of the respective Districts. District No. 7 has now
executed new agreements with three of the four entities that collect
connection fees on its behalf. A budget item to account for the 5% fee
retained by the cities should, therefore, be established.
-6-
The above transfers along with a reallocation of Uncollectable Account
charges for bad debts in District No. 7 are reflected in the recommended
budget transfer summary attached hereto.
JWS:dt
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
and Board Secretary
-7-
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED BUDGET TRANSFERS
JOINT OPERATING FUND
From the Account To the Account
Salaries & Wages
Gas, Oi 1, Fuel
Repairs & Mtce.
Prior Years' Exp.
DISTRICT FUNDS
Amount
$411 ,000
$ 40,000
50,000
321,000
$411, 000
Dist. No. Fund From the Account To the Account --
1 ACO Faci 1. lmprov. & Banking
Ext. Reserve Services
1 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking .
I 51 Charge Services
2 Oper Pump Sta. Mtce. Utilities
2 ACO Faci 1. lmprov. & Banking
Ext. Reserve Services
2 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
'51 Charge Services
2 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
'58 Charge Services ·
3 ACO Fae i 1. lmprov. & Banking
Ext. Reserve Services
3 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
Charge Services
5 ACO Fae i 1 • lmprov. & Banking
Ext. Reserve Services
5 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
Charge Services
Amount
$ 4,000
$ 50
$ 3,000
$ 10,000
$ 25
$ 225
$ 9,000
$ 350
$ 2,500
$ 25
DISTRICT FUNDS (cont'd)
Dist. No. Fund From the Account To the Account Amount -
5 Fae Invest. Serv. Banking
Rev Charge Services $ 350
6 ACO Un co 11 ec ted
Accounts $ 500
Invest. Serv.
Charge $ 900
$ 1 ,400
Banking
Services $ 1,400
6 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
Charge Services $ 25
7 Oper Line Clean
Mtce. $ 14 '200
Pump Sta.
Mtce. $ 14,ooo
Uncollected
Accounts $ 200
$ 14,200
7 ACO Faci 1. lmprov. &
Ext. Reserve $ 4,500
Banking
Services $ 3,000
Uncollected
Accounts $ 1 ,500
$ 4,500 .
7 Const Faci 1. lmprov. & Banking .
Ext. Reserve Services $ 300
7 Fixed Invest. Serv.· Banking
Oblig. Charge Services $ 25
7 Fae Fae i 1 • lmprov. &
Rev Ext. Reserve $ 6,800
DISTRICT FUNDS (cont'd)
Dist. No. Fund From the Account To the Account Amount
7 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
1 51 Charge Services $ 25
Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
1 62 Charge Services $ 100
Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
•70 Charge Services $ 150
11 Oper Manhole
Replacement $ 6,000
Pump Sta.
Mtce. $ 5,000
Prior Year 1 s
Exp. $ 1,000
$ 6,000
11 ACO Fae i 1. lmprov. & Banking
Ext. Reserve Services $ 3,500
~
11 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
I 51 Charge Services $ 25
11 Bond Invest. Serv. Banking
'58 Charge Services $ 100
~
1....1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET REMAINING
1977-78 YEAR TO DATE BUDGET
SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS
Salaries & Wages 4,033,805 2,572,398 1,461,407
Employee Benefits 704, 079 393,495 310,584
Sub-total Payroll 4' 737 ,884 2,965,893 1, 771,991
Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF 1,000,000 850,268 149,732
Net Joint Operating Payroll 3,737,884 2' 115 ,625 1,622,259
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES
Gasoline, Oil & Fuel 10,000 64,238 5,762
Insurance 145,000 102,899 42, 101
Office Expense 45,000 17,350 27,650
Operating Expense
Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals 300,000 143,951 156,049
Chemical Coagulants 420,000 197,212 222,788
Other Operating Supplies 147,000 70,800 76,200
Contractual Services 390,000 193,189 196 ,811
Professional Services 367,000 38,598 328,402
Printing & Publications 41,000 19,828 21,172
Rents & Leases--Equipment 22,000 9,654 12,346
Repairs & Maintenance 413,000 350,443 62,557
Research & Monitoring 288,000 93,483 194,517
Travel, Meeting & Training 25,000 16,143 8,857
Utilities 883,000 546,848 336,152
Other Expenses 25,000 18,735 6,265
Prior Years Expense 20,000 333' 117 (313 ,117)
Total Material & Supplies 3,601,000 2,216,488 1,384,512
TOfAL JOINT· OPERATING EXPENSE 7,338,884 4,332,113 3,006,771
Less: Revenues 521,000 155,088 365,912
NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE 6,817,884 4,177,025 2,640,859
GALLONAGE INFORMATION
FLOW IN MILLION GAL GALLONAGE CHARGES
DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE
1 7,878 5,562 789, 511 465,298
2 21,184 16,226 2,123,089 1,357,367
3 21,868 15,874 2,192,631 1,327,986
5 3,962 2,809 396, 801 235,014
6 4,185 2,950 419,300 246,803
7 4,437 3,263 444,526 272,926
11 4,510 3,247 452,026 271, 631
TOTAL 68,024 49,931 6,817,884 4,177,025
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31
1977-78
Budget
1,399,948
1,234,000
234,000
426,600
900,000
6·,566, 564
90,738
789,511
80,650
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Raitt Street Trunk
Share of Joint Works
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT &
EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stns.
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment
Facilities
Other assets at cost less
amortization
Total Property Plant &
Equipment
Balance
6-30-77
1,331,350
3,689,261
5,020,611
21,657
4,241,810
11,593
13,709
5,593,818
4,292
1-4.,907. 490
Additions
63,586
599,997
663,583
Year to Date
5,481,908
887,704
180,855
173,787
262,781
6,987,035
63,586
599,997
81,769
465,298
33,342
1,243,992
5,743,043
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
v-
R cm a in in g
Budget
512,244
1,053,145
60,213
163,819
836,414
5,966,567
8,969
324,213
47,308
Balance
3-31-78
1,394,936
4,289,258
5,684,194
21,657
4,241,810·
11,593
13,709
5,593,818
\.,.)
.4, 292
15,571,073
·•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
Beginning Fund Balances, July I
REVENUES:
Taxes
BUDGET REVIEW
1977-78
Budget
Federal and State Construction Grants
5,853,996
4,356,000
1,580,000
1,372,400
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction.& Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating EA-penses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
10,664,993
22,424,534
524,956
2,123,089
412,500
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
-Santa Ana River Interceptor
Yorba Linda Pump Station
Yorba Linda Force Main
Yorba Linda Pump Station Manhole
Anaheim Forebay Reclamation Plant
Sleepy Hollow/Carbon Canyon
Richfield and Orchard Sub Trunks
Share of Joint Works
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT &
EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pwnp Stns.
Treatment Facilities
l)isposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment
Facilities
-..__; Other assets at cost less
amortiz.ation
Total Property Plant &
Equipment
FACILITIES EXPANSION
Balance
6-30-77
11,213,600
798,675
732,413
22,306
36, 113
23,346
-0-
12,826,453
12,102,723
24,929,176
374,084
28,364,889
1,186
33,172
33,582
18,350,674
14,197
72,100,960
Additions
187,449
1,983
22 '620,
43 ,646'
255,698
1,968,309
2,224,007
2,224,007
Year to Date
22,929,112
3,631,910
593,300
1,044,776
1,456,332
29,655,430
255,698
1,968,309
460,784
1,357,367
188,976
4,231,134
25,424,296
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
Remaining
Budget
2,222,086
3,762,700
535,224
(83,932)
10,409,295
20,456,225
64,172
765,722
223,524
Balance
3-31-78
11,401,049
798,675
732,413
24,289
36, 113
45,966
43,646
13,082,151
14,071,032
27,153,183
374,084
28,364,889
1,186
33J172
33,582
18,350,674
14,197
74,324,967
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1
REVENUES:
Ta·xes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
1977-78
Budget
8,050,515
4,775,000
1,243,000
1,132,225
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
.: _Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
15,720,559
14,835,524
735,907
2,192,631
562,000
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31
FACILITIES EXPANSION
Balance
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 6-30-77 Additions
Knott .Interceptor, a JlGrtion of
Reach 7 3,922,654 228,590
Orangethorpe Relief Trunk · -0-33,141
Knott Interceptor, Reaches 7 & 8 99,293 104,912
Westside Relief Interceptor 1,359,068 4,850
Westminster Ave. Force Main 52,615 350
5,433,630 371,843
Share of Joint Works 13,421,766 2,182,829
18,855,396 2,554,672
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT &
EQUIPMENT:
"Land and Property Rights 266,131
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 35,895,855
Treatment Facilities 15,036
Disposal Facilities 28,419
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities 52,006
Equity in Joint Treatment
Facilities 20,350,664
OtheT assets at cost less
amortization 15,752
Total Property Plant & 75,479,259 2,554;672 Equipment
Year to Date
21,034,669
4,953,947
984,744
932,660
1, 111, 098
29,017,118
371,843
2,182,829
636,224
1,327,986
239,150
4,758,032
24,259,086
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
R •• v ema1n1ng
Budget
3,096,568
3,790,256
310,340
21,127
15,348,716
12,652,695
99,683
864,645
322,850
Balance
3-31-78
4,151,244
33,141
204,205
1,363,918
52,965
5,805,473
15,604,595
21,410,068
266, 13·1
35,895,855
15,036
-28 ,419
.52,006
. .
20,350,664 v
15,752
78,033,9~],
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
1977-78
Budget
1,518,664
914,000
142,000
1,386,100*
3,605,945
4,650,950
27,865
396,801
366,200
Year to Date
5,335,033
974,612
136,089
47,090
277,638
6,770,4~2
14,671
451,483
24,473
235,014
123,682
849,323
Ending Fund Balances, March 31 5,921,139
\_./tincludes $1,150,000 loan from Irvine Co. for Back Bay Drive
Sewer (or alternate) and Bayside Drive sewer extension, if needed.
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications·
Back Bay Drive Trunk
NIWA Planning
Other
Share of Joint Works
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT &
. EQUI~MENT:
Land and Property Rights
, .. _ ... ,, Collection Lines and Pump -stns.
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
FACILITIES EXPANSION
Balance
6-30-77
18,857
268,059
7,130
5,180
299,226
2,776,078
3,075,304
6,231
3,117,223
7,347
7 ,116
Additions
3,939
7,185
5,435
(1,888)*~
14,671
451,483
466,154
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities 8,946
Equity in Joint Treatment
i.....,.,;· Facilities 4,209,209
Other assets at cost less
amortization 3,270
Total P"roperty Plant & 10,434,646 466,154 Equipment
**Litigation Cost Reimbursement, Cont 5-19
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
Remaining
Budget
544,052
777 ,911
94,910
1,108,462
3,591,274
4,199,467
3,392
161,787
242,518
Balance
3-31-78
22,796
275,244
12,565
3,292
313,897
3,227,561
. 3,541,458
6,231
3,117 ,223
7,347
7 ,116
8,946
4,209,209
3,270
10,900,800
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31
1977-78
Budget
890,092
792,000
10,000
183,200
961,000
3,147 ,114
33,922
419,300
86,000
FACILITIES EXPANSION
Balance
6-30-77 Additions
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications· 502
New Metering Structure 861
Other 7,512 109
8,875 109
Share of Joint Works 2,370,219 385,477
2,379,094 385,586
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT &
EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 562
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 625,628
Treatment Facilities 2,653
Disposal Facilities 7,394
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities 16,237
.Equity in Joint Treatment
Facilities 3,593,828
Other assets at cost less
amortization 6,983
Total Property Plant & 6,632,379 385,586 Equipment
Year to Date
3,029,783
548,701
116, 193
28,443
153,652
3,876,772
109
385,477
30,035
246,803
25,092
687,516
3,189,256
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
Remaining
Budget
341,391
675,807
(18,443)
29,548
966,891
2,761,637
3,887
172,497
60,908
Balance
3-31-78
502
861
7,621
8,984
2,755,696
2,764,680
562
625,628
2,653
7,394
16,237
3,593,828
6,983
7,017,965
v
.·
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET IUWIE\V
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31
1977-78
Budget
2,267,815
1,147,000
384,000
2,182,162*
4,492,327
5,886,058
677,447
444,526
370,250
'-9/*Includes transfer of prior year's connection fees
from cities pursuant to new agreements.
FACILITIES EXPANSION
Balance
6-30-77 Additions
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Tustin-Orange Trunks 3,516
MacArthur Pump Station
Bubbler System 1;146 423
Increase Pumping Capability -0-2,687
Other 1 2,395
7,057 3,110
Share of Joint Works 3 ,429 ,511 557,753
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & 3,436,568 560 ,863.
. EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 275,740
Collection Lines and Pt.imp Stns. 17,965,729
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities 10,782
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities 12,440
Equity in Joint Treatment
'--1) Facilities 5,199,973
Other assets at cost less
amortization 4,263
Total Property Plant & 26,905,495 560,863 Equipment
'
Year to Date
6,685,741
1,394,471
168,122
406,083
1,724,009
10,378,426
3,110
557,753
383,680
272,926
147,097
1,364,566
9,013,860
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
Remaining
Budget
873,344
978,878
(22,083)
458,153
4,489,217
5,328,305
293,767
171,600
223,153
Balance
3-31-78
3,516
1,569
2,687
2,395
10,167
3,987,264
3,997,431
275,740
17,965,729
10,782
12,440
5,199,973
4,263
27,466,358
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
SLlMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1978
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
_ .. Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31
· CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Master Plan
Coast Hwy. Trunk
Slater Ave. Pump Station
Share of Joint Works
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT &
EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stns.
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment
Facilities
Other assets at cost less
amortization
Total Property Plant &
Equipment
FACILITIES
Balance
6-30-77
20,879
8,038
. 1,226
30,143
2,796,371
2,826,514
18, 711
3,872,692
3,053
24 ,435
4,239,978
3.250
10,988.633
1977-78
Budget
1,749,789
934,000
240,000
389, 100
5,266,000
3,243,256
90,226
452,026
211, 250
EXPANSION
Additions
937
166
1,103
454,784
455,887
455,887
Year to Date
6,493,303
1,064,251
137,084
20,682
323,319
8,038,639
1,103
454,784
76,371
271,631
110 ,270
914.159
7.124,480
Transfer to
Fixed Assets
u-
R em a in in g
Budget
685,538
796,916
219,318
65,781
5,264,897
2,788,472
13,855
180,395
100,980
v
Balance
3-31-78
21,816
8,204
1,226
31,246
3,251,155
3,282,401
18, 711
3,872,692
3,053
24,·435
4,239,978~/
3,250
May 3, 1978
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE C OUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.0 .BOX 61 27
10644 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706
(714) 540-2910
(714 ) 962-241 1
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: April 26, 1 978
Present: Absent:
Don Saltarelli, Chairman
James Sharp
Henry Wedaa
Bernie Svalstad
Don Mcinnis
Ron Pattinson
Supv. Thomas F. Riley
Bill Vardoulis
Convened:
Adjourned:
5:30 p.m.
8:00 p.m.
Don Fox, Vice Chairman
Kerm Rima
0-thers Present:
Director Bernard Houston
Director Donald Hudson
Bill Butler, Ken Hanna, and
Larry Provisor, Peat, Marwick,
Mitchell & Company
Sta.ff' Pr·esent:
Fred Harper, General Manager
Wayne Sylvester, Director of
Finance
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
Thomas L. Woodruff, General
Couns el
1. Consultants' (Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company) Recommen-
dation re Data Processing and Revenue Program Status Report.
Representatives of the Districts'· consultant , Peat Marwick,
Mitchell & Company reviewed the enclosed data processing study
report wh ich was authorized by the Boards last year. This report
on dat a processing was prepared in conjunction with the User Ch arge
Revenue Program which must be in place and on line by July 1, 1979
pursuant to State and Federal requirements. The study evaluated
the existing XCS (Xerox) services, available public data processing
services and an in-house minicomputer. The ana lysis of the alter-
nate approaches centered on services provided , resources utilize d,
and conve rsion requirements and costs when considering the Districts'
needs and processing volumes. The results of the evaluation indicate
that the in-house minicomputer approach is the most cost-effective
and appropriate to meet the Districts' unique requirements for the
next five years. They estimate that the utilization of an in-house
minicomputer wi l l result i n a savin gs of approximately $120,000
over the five -year period and wil l p rovide the necessary flexi -
bility for future applications.
They noted that this is the more risky so l ut i on in terms of
h aving to develop computer prog rams (software) and convert the
existi ng automated application, but the benef i ts far exceed the
r isks.
I t is the Committee 's re comme ndation t hat the Boards approve
the consultant 's report and summary of findings, and that the
consultant, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company be engaged to ass i st
the Districts in the following:
1. Se l ection of a minicomputer vendor
2. System imp l ementation
3. Evaluation of other applications
4. Evaluation of cost effectiveness
The Committee directed the staff to secure a proposal for
these services from the consultant to be submitted to the Joint
Boards at their May 10th meet ing . Representatives of Peat, Marwick,
Mitchell & Company indicated that they coul d perform the work in
accordance wi th the schedule on an hour l y per diem basis in an
amount not to exceed $50,000.
2. Southern California Coastal Water· Re.sear ch Project (SCCWRP).
In 1969, the Districts, in conjunction with the City of San
Diego, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts,
and Ventura County formed the Southern Ca l ifornia Coastal Water
Research Project (SCCWRP) through a Joint Powers Agreement. The
funding level was established at $1/2 mil l ion/year with each entity
c ontributing a percentage based on their annual treated waste dis -
c harge to the ocean. Currently, our Districts contribute $87,250
(1 7 .5%). The results of SCC WRP 's work have been very g ratifying.
In fact, it is t h e only major research going on in the coun t ry re -
l ated to discharge of municip a l waste to the marine enviro nme nt .
The results of these studies have been extremely he l pful in con-
v i ncing Federa l and State agencies that munic i pal discharges have
re l ative l y littl e effect on the marine environment .
During the past nine years, t he financing effort has not in -
creased above the original $1/2 million/year except for some State
and Federal g rants for specific research projects. The couunissioners
of the SCCWRP program wo uld like the sponsoring agenc ies to consider
increasing the annual budget so tha t they can maintain the level
of effort that was originally intended when th e $50 0,000 budget was
established in 1969 (equiva l ent to $800,000 in 1978).
The current Join t Powers Agreement carries the pro g ram to June
30, 1979. In the event the Districts receive a waiver of the Federal
-2-
~-
secondary treatment requirements for ocean discharge, continued
work by SCCWRP will be absolutely necessary. If the Districts
are required to go to full secondary treatment r egardless of the
impact on the marine environment, the Boards may question the direct
benefit to our taxpayers to continue to fund this worthwhile program.
The Committee deferred action on this item pending further
deve lopm ent of the Federal regulations for waiver of secondary
treatment requirements for deep ocean discharge.
3. Employee Representation in Meet-and-Confer Sessions.
The Di stricts have received a petition from the Laborers'
Int ernational Union of North America to conduct an election among
our emp l oyees who are currently represented by the Or a n ge Count y
Employees Association. The petition claims that they h ave 101
signed authorization cards from the tota l 120 employees in the
bargaining unit. ·
Prior to receiving the communication from the Union, a petition
was presented by our laboratory personnel requesting recognition
as a separate barga ining unit. Laboratory personnel attempted to
interest the e ngineering department to join them in their petition;
however, they were unsuccessful .
Following a brief discussion concerning this matter, the General
Manager advised, on the advice of the General Counsel, that in
answering the petition from the Laborers In ternational Union of
North America he wou ld exc lude those positions involving laboratory
and engineering personnel from the bargaining unit presently repre-
sented by OCEA.
4. Status Report re Sludge Disposal.
Several weeks ago, we learned from our sludge hauling contractor,
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, that their land lease with The Irvine
Company would not be renewed effective July 1st. Since then, we
h ave had severa l discussions with representatives of The Irvine
Comp any, the Irvine Ranch Water District and Goldenwest Fertilizer
Comp any to discuss solutions to this imm ediate problem. As of this
dat e, the discussions are continuing.
Attached is a staff report recommending that we proceed with
two projects at Plant No. 1 for h andling sewage solids.
5. Conflict of Interest Code Reporting Procedures .
Pursuant to the Boards' discussion and direction, the General
Coun sel has reviewed the Districts' current disclosure statements
and procedures for reporting in compliance with the Districts '
Conflict of Interest Code.
-3-
Mr. Woodruff reported that he had developed a new statement
of economic interest (Conflict of Interest Code adopted by
Reso l ution No. 76-99 dated June 9, 1976), which will enable the
Directors to reproduce the 72 1 form filed with the individual
cities, provided the form itemizes all reportable interest or
income on business or real property that the Directors would
have to report for the Districts.
The Committee recommends that the Boards adopt the form 721
as proposed by the General Co u nsel to simplify the filing of the
required reports.
6. Self Insurance.
Pursuant to the instructions of the Executive Committee, the
Fiscal Policy CoIIlI!littee has continued to investi gate the possibility
of the Districts becoming self-insured for liability coverage, in-
cluding vehicles, as well as self insurance for worker's compensa-
tion . Enclosed is the Committee's report and r ecommendat ion that
the Districts proceed imm e diately with self insur a nce effective as
soon as possible. Included in the report is a r ecorrunendat ion that
the Boards authorize the addition of an appropriate administrative
position that wil l be responsible to the General Manager for imple -
menting a complete safety program as well as administering the
recommended self-insurance program.
It is the Fiscal Policy Committee's belief that the Dis t ricts
will enjoy an annual cost savings of from a minimum of $35,000 to
as much as $100,000, based on the Districts' past loss experience .
The Executive Committee discussed the report and concurs in
the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendations a, b, c & e.
With respect to reconrrnendation d, it appears that because of
the small number of District employees and the hig h labor market
demand for qualified safety engineers, it may be more cost -effective
to have these services provided on a consu l ting basis, at least for
the first year. Therefore, it is the Executive Committee's recom-
mendation that the Districts' staff be authorized to engage an indi-
vidual or a firm on a consulting basis to oversee the Safety Program
loss prevention effort and to administer worker's compensation and
liability claims in the event a further savi~gs can be realized by
the Districts.
-4-
~·
May 3, 1978
ST AF F REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
1084.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) S.C0-2910
(71.C) 962-2411
INTERIM PLANS FOR PROCESSING OF SEWAGE SOLIDS
As previously reported to the Boards, our solids handling and
disposal problems have been compounded by:
A. The completion of the activated sludge facilities
at Plant No. 1, which produces more solids for
handling and disposal. The more solids which are
removed from the effluent being discharged to the
ocean, the more solids handling problems are
encountered at the two Plants.
B. The Districts' contractor, who is responsible to
remove the solids from the Treatment Plants and
process these solids on a site location in the
Irvine Ranch, has not satisfactorily pe~formed
and met his lease agreement with the Irvine Company,
thereby jeopardizing a suitable land disposal site
for our digested dewatered sewage solids.
The staff has had several meetings with representatives of the
Irvine Ranch Water District, the Irvine Company, along with the
staff of LA/OMA, to search out alternate disposal sites. While
this investigation is proceeding, the staff is recommending two
projects which should be considered to accommodate better han-
dling of the sewage solids at Plant No. 1. These projects are
as follows:
INTERIM SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT #1
.This proposed project would entail preparing a twelve
acre .~ite westerly and adjacent to the new activated sludge
facilities. This area had been previously occupied by the
construction contractor as his construction yard. This
area is not planned for any new facilities in the immediate
future. Staff is recommending that the Board approve the
preparation of the plans and specifications by staff to
prepare this twelve acres which could be used for on-site
composting operations. The preparation of the site would
entail stabilization of the ground by the addition of
either soil cement or gypsum. This stabilization is re-
quired to adequately accommodate the equipment· required for
a composting operation. A drainage system is also required
to accommodate surface runoff in order not to create a
nuisance from the composting area. It is estimated that
Staff Report
"Sewage Solids"
May 3, 1978
Page Two
the cost of this site preparation is $125,000. The
staff is also recommending that bids be solicited
and received on June 13th and reported to the Directors
at the June Board Meeting, along with the results of
our investigation of alternate disposal sites which may
be on the Irvine Company property.
In addition to the preparation of the site for a compost
operation, the Districts would be required to purchase
additional equipment to perform this solids processing
program. The lease or purchase of the equipment is
estimated ~~ $150,000. No action is requested at this
time regarding the equipment pending our investigations
and studies of alternate disposal sites.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER CLEANING BEDS AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. . ..... .
Included in the 1977-78 CORF budget is $350,000 to in-
stall an underdrain tile system in the existing digester
cleaning beds at Plant No. 1. We have ten digesters at
the Plant which must be periodically cleaned, removing
the accumulation of sand and grit in order that the
digesters can properly function. A similar system was
recently installed at Plant No. 2 to aid in the cleaning
operation of the fifteen digesters at that Plant. This
underdrain system facilitates the draining of the water
from the sewage solids removed in the digester cleaning
program, thereby allowing a faster processing time of
the residual solids.
Staff is recommending the Directors approve the prepara-
tion of the plans and specifications by staff for this
budgeted item and authorize soliciting bids for said
work which are tentatively scheduled to be received on
July 27th. Results are anticipated to be presented to
the Boards for their consideration at the August Meeting.
....... __ ....,.-
iC' /S
If'_~:-~) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714') 962-2411
April 6 11 1978
ME MORAND.UM
TO: Executive Committee
FROM: Fiscal Policy Conunitte~
SUBJECT: . Report and Recommendation re Liability and Workers' Compensation
Self-Insurance
Recommendation
Pursuant to the October 26, 1977 authorization of the Executive Committee,
the Fiscal Policy Committee has been studying the feasibility of self-
insurance and based upon our review 11 the following recommendations are
submitted herewith:
a) Implement a plan of self-insurance for general and automobile
primary liability coverage effective July 1, 1978.
b) Implement a plan of self-insurance for workers' compensation
coverage effective July 1 11 1978.
c) Establish a combined liability/workers' compensation self-
insurance reserve fund in the amount of $500,000 for the fiscal
year 1978-79.
d) Establish position of Safety Engineer (or other appropriate title)
to oversee an increased safety program/loss prevention effort and to
administer liability and workers' compensation claims.
e) Retain services of Warren, McVeigh & Griffin, Risk Management
Consultants, to assist the staff in establishing job specifications
for the Safety Engineer, development of safety/loss prevention
program and claims administration policies and procedures.
Background
During the course of our self-insurance study and with the concurrence of
Joint Chairman Saltarelli, the firm of Warren, McVeigh & Griffin, Risk
Management Consultants, was engaged to assist in reviewing the feasibility
of self-insurance for workers' compensation and liability coverage. The
committee also met with the.Districts' broker, Mr. Dick Beckendorf, of Coast
Insurance Agency. Our premium and 1oss·experience history as well as
anticipated future premium costs and losses which might be anticipated based
upon past experience were thoroughly considered.
The Fiscal Policy Committee members are not totally in agreement in their
recommendation.. Al t1'ough the consultant advises against ·self-insurance· at this
time (see attached summary), the·majority of the Committee is of the opinion
that the Districts should implement a self-insurance program for primary
liability and workers' compensation coverage beginning with the 1978-79 fiscal
year with a target date of July 1st, or as soon thereafter as feasible. The
major area of disagreement among Committee members is whether implementation
should be delayed for at least another year.
Our best estimates at this time, barring any major losses (major losses are
considered to be those in the neighborhood of $100,000 of which we have not
experienced any in the past) indicate that the Districts might expect to
realize a minimum annual cost savings of $35,000 as follows, and possibly
as much as $100,000 per year:
l. J
1978-79
··current Annual-Cost
1978-79
Projected Annua~ Cost
· ·Self-Insurance
Anticipated
Annual
Savings
Premiuni for Primary
Coverage: Liability $ 18,000 $ 78,000
Workers' Comp. 150,000 150,000
Added Cost for Excess
Coverage: Liability $ 10,000 (10, 000)
Workers' Comp. 28,500 (28,500)
Legal Fees (General Counsel) 2,000 15,000 (13,000)
O/S Claims Adjusting Services 5,000 (5,000)
District Staff: Clerical 2,000 10,000 (8 J 000)
Safety Engineer 30,000 (30, 000)
Claim or Deductible: Liability · 2,500 11,000 (8,500)
Workers' Co~p. 90,000 (90,000)
TOTALS : : :$234;500 : : :$199;500 $35,000
It is fully expected that premium costs would continue to rise significantly in the
coming years which would further increase future annual savings, assuming the loss
level remains fairly constant. With implementation of an in.creased safety/loss
prevention program.effort we would hope that our loss experience would be favorably
influenced.
Following is a more detailed explanation of the abov~ recommendations:
· a) Im leme.nt self-insurance for ·rirnar · liability coverage effective ·
~
July 1, 1978. The current primary liability premium is 68,000 for
$300, 000/$100, 0.00 BI/PI;> with a $250 qeductible. Our broker has obtained
a quote of $78,000 for 1978-79, an increase of 15%. At staff's request
proposals were also requested with deductibles of $5,000, $50,000 and '-r"
$100,000. We have been advised that premium re4uctions for increased
-2-
deductibles would not produce savings consistent with the added risk
assumption.
The consultant has further advised that the umbrella policy premium
which is now $20,000 could be expected to increase by as much as $10,000
if the primary coverage is dropped. This policy, which should be continued,
covers losses in excess of $300,000 to a limit of $5,000,000. The
estimated savings have taken this increase into consideration as well
as added administrative costs.
Based on an average annual loss experience of $11,000 we would expect to
realize savings of approximately $20,000 if we elect self liability
coverage.
b) Im lement self-insurance for workers' com ensation effective July 1, 1978.
Workers' compensation premiums in 1978-79 are estimated to be 150,000.
Exhibit 3 attached to the enclosed statement of conclusions prepared by
Warren, McVeigh & Griffin in connection with their study projects a
possible savings of between $17,400 and $24,101 if we self-insure. The
consultant recommends that if the Districts do choose to self-insure, an
excess coverage policy should be obtained to assume $5 million limit of
coverage in excess of $100,000 each occurrence or self-insured retention.
c) Establish a combined liability/workers' compensation self-insurance
reserve fund for 1978-79. The consultant has recommended that $500,000
would be an adequate combined reserve· for liability and workers' comp-
ensation claims. The committee is of the opinion that the Districts'
goal should be to establish an eventual reserve of· $1 million. Future
reserve amounts would, of course, be influenced by other available
reserves with due consideration for revised loss experience.
Staff has advised that the initial funds ($500,000) could be transferred
from accumulated construction reserves to fund the self-insurance
retention until funding is available from current savings or revenues.
Although the interest earned on the self-insurance reserve would, in
all likelihood, eventually cover the administrative costs, the committee
wishes to point out that this would merely be a shift in the source and
application of revenues. However, it is recommended that annual insurance
savings and interest be credited to the reserve until the desired level
is achieved •
. d) Establish position of Safety Engineer (or other appropriate title) to
oversee safety/loss prevention,.program and administer claims. The
committee feels that in order for any self-insurance program to be
effective there must be an intensive effort in the area of safety
engineering and loss preve~t~on. In order to accomplish this it is
deemed necessary to establish a position in the Districts organizational
structure with appropriate authority to supervise the program and that
said position be independent of the engineering and operational/
maintenance departments.
It is further recommended that this classification, with clerical
._..,.. assistance, assume the responsibility for claims administration which is
now handled by the respective insurance.underwriters. The committee
recommends that if the self-insurance concept is approved, immediate
-~-
authorization for such a position be granted and that the staff be
authorized to recruit for and fill the opening as soon as possible.
e) Retain services of consultant to assist in establishing job specifications
for the Safety Engineer, development of safety/loss prevention program
and claims administration policies and procedures. It is the consensus
of the Committee that the Safety Engineer's position is extremely important
if the self-insurance program is to succeed. Care should be exercised
in preparing· the job specification and selection of an employee. Further,
it will be necessary to develop and implement proper safety and loss
prevention programs and claims administration policies and procedures.
The Districts will also be required to obtain the services of an
in~ependent claims adjuster to assist -in the administratien of both
liability and workers' compensation claims. The Committee recommends
that the services of Warren, M~Veigh & Griffin be continued to assist
the Boards and staff in this regard until establishment and implementation
of the Districts self-insurance program is completed.
Respectfully submitted,
James Sharp, Chairman·
Don Holt
Enclosures:
Warren, McVeigh & Griffin
Statement of Major Conclusions re
Liability and Workers' Compensation
Staff Report re Liability Insurance
Dick Olson
Paul Ryckof f
-4-
~ .
LIABILITY INSURANCE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
1. Current primary insurance coverage, placed with Safeco Insurance Company, is broad
and competitively priced.
2. The Districts' insurance broker has found significant premium savings are not
available for a large (e.g. $50 .. 000 or greater) self-insured retention. Our informal
conversations with potential underwriters confirm this:
"..,.; 3. The low level of losses, incurred by the Districts, does not permit prediction of future
losses wi.th any reasonable degree of accuracy. Accordingly, an accurate projection
of savings from a large deductible plan is also not possible.
4. Loss responsive rating plans, where the ·final premium charged bears a direct
relationship to the losses incurred; are generally not available rior desirable for
accounts the size of the Distri·~ts•.
5. Options available to the Distrfots:
a. Renew with Saicco, annual premium of $77 ,671, coverage ns expiring.
b. Renew with Safeco, annual premium $66,525, $5,000 each occurrence deductible.
c. Investigate f eo.sibility of pooling liability exposures with other sanitation
districts.
V/nrrcn, McVolgh & Grlmn
Althour,h option b offers an $11,000 premium snvings, we recommend the Districts
renew with Saf cco per option n. Over a long period of ti me losses arc likely to
approximate the premium savings. Also, an insurer, operating with a $5,000
deductible, is mo1·e likely to settle small claims without contesting them, anticipating
being made whole by the Districts.
Option c would require several months to determine the interest of other districts in
the pooling concept and its feasibility.
WORKERS' COI\lPENS.A TION
6. The size of the Districts does not allow a sophisticated projection of losses with a
high degree of credibility. However, if we assume -losses will continue to be 60% of
standard premium, a savings of about 16% is likely to be realized.
'I. Advantages to self-insuring workers' compensation include:
a. Lower claims costs through better quality claims handling.
b. Safety engineering services can be improved and more easily directed to problem
loss areas.
c. Reduced costs through elimination of insurance company overhead.
8. Caveats to self-insurance include:
a. If the State Compensation Insurance Fund returns to paying dividends to public
entities, the anticipated self-insurance savings might be reduced or eliminated.
b. It is likely the Districts would have to assume $100,000 each occurrence self-
insured retention (SIR) as lower SIR's are not being offered by excess
underwriters. In future years the SIR is likely to go to $150,000 or higher. This
high level of loss assumption could produce funding problems in years when large·
losses occur.
c •. To improve and monitor safety and claims handling practices more management
attention will be required.
Warren, rl.cVclgh 1' Griffin
9. Recommended plun of action:
a. Evaluate the estimated ~avin~ in relation to the Districts needs, recognizing
premium costs will continue to rise as benefit levels, medicul costs and payroll
rise.
b. Determine alternatives to funding unexpected large losses. For example, setting
aside an amount equal to the Sill.
c. Obtain definitive cost quotations on excess insurance, claim administration and
safety engineering.
d. Choose between remaining insured or going self-insured, based on the informa-
tion obtained above •
..
Warren, McVelr.h & Griffin
Year
7·1-76/77
75/76
74/75
73/74
72/73
7-1-77/78
7-1-78/79
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
U-t-fX:\ C;L·-·l~l-JT(\-T\
' Exhihit l
. PRIMARY GENER.-\L Ll:\BILilT& :\UTOMORll.E
Premium & Loss History
Incurred Ratio of Losses
Premium Losses To ·Premiums
$ SS,771 $ 1,019 2%
27,709 13,348 48%
28,121 S,697 20%
16,237 1,650 10%
15,420 21,410 139%
$143,258 $43,124 30%
Estimated Annual Premium-$68,110
Estimated Annual Premium-$77,671
($66,525 @ $5 ,,000 Ded.)
' . (, ,· ( (
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Exhibit 2
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
• Premium & Loss Iii story
Ratio of Number Medical ·Lost
Incurred Losses to of Only Ti mo
Year Premium Losses Premiums Injuries Claims Coses
7-i-76/77 $ 96,953 $ 45,642 47% 71 51 20
75/76 .59 '206 18,283 31% 75 52 23
74/75 48,708· 60,751 125% 60 49 11
73/74 46,159 21,916 4 7% 53 43 10
72/73 462325 36,899 . 80% 44 42 2
$297,351 $183,491 62% 303 237 66
7-1-77/78 Estimated Annual Premium -·$125,000
7-1-78/79 Estimated Annual Premium·~ $150,000
COUNTY S.\~HT.\ TT0~1 DT ST!U C:TS OF
ORJ\~l;J.i COUNTY
WORKERS' COMPE~SATION
Insurance vs Self-Insurance
1978/79
Insurance
Estimated Annual Premium-$150,000
Deposit
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Credit Deposit
Audit Additional
Total Insurance Cost
Self-Insurance
Excess Insurance PremiumCl)
Administration CostsC2)
Estimate'd Losses
Total Self-Insurance Costs
Difference
. % Savings
$
Direct
Cost
25,500
25,500
25,500
25,500
25,500
(25,500)
48,000
$150,000
$ 28,500
14,100
90,000
$132,600
$ 17,400
11.6
Time.
Element
0
0
.25 .so
.75
1. 00
1. 25
0
0
2. 2 ( 3)
Exhihit~3
$
Present
Value
@ 6%
25,500
25,500
25' 14 3
24,760
24,404
(24,046)
44,640
$145,901
$ 28,500
14,100
79,200
$121,800
$ 24,101
16.S
(1) Calculated at 19% of Fully Insured Premium; assumes $5 Million
Limit of Coverage excess of $100,000 each occurrence sclf-
insured retention.
(2) Includes claim administration at 12% of Estimated Losses,
safety engineering (6 days at $250 per day) and legal fees at
2% of Estimated Lowses.
(3) Industry average for workers' compensation losses.
I.._)
Courfl f SANITATION Dis 1 l\1crs
of 0HANG[ CouN TY, C,\l If n1m1A
r.o. uox 0121
108.C.C [LLIS AVCNUl
FOUNTAIN VAl l (Y, CAllfC'HNIA 9H~S
(71.CJ !1.CO·Z910
~ Janu3ry 6, 1978 C71 'J 962·2.C 1 I
To: Fiscal Policy Commi ttcc
Subject: General nnd Auto Liability Self-Insurance
Pursuant to the Co1mni ttcc' s direction the staff has obtained preliminary
information concerning the cost/benefit of converting the Districts' general
and auto lfa.bility coverage to a self-insured program. The Districts presently
have in force a first dollar comprehensive general and auto liability policy
with SAFECO Insuranc\? Comp3n)' that essentially provides a limit of $300, 000
with a $250 property damage deductible. Any claim o~curring within the policy
period will be defended by the insurer and any judgment rendered will be paid
in full, subject to the policy limit and the deductible. Under a self-insurance
plan the Districts, within the self-insured limits, would be responsible for
all administrath·e, engineering, inves~igative, defense .and claims costs.
·...._; The attached schedule
first dollar coverage
in more detail below.
additional expense or
the two approaches.
summarizes and compares the estimated cost of the current
plan with a pi·ogram of self-coverage which is discussed
The schedule has been prepared to illustrate the relative
savings associated with the major items of cost in comparing
. ·..._;
1. Premium: We have been advised that a tentative premium of
approximately $36,000 could perhaps be obtained to provide
self-insurance for liability co\•erage of $250, 000 combined
single limit in excess of a $50,000 self-insured retention.
If the retention is increased to $100,000, it is estimated
that the premium would be reduced by approximately $5,000 . .
2. Legal Fees: The Districts' Gcn~ral Counsel has estimated
that during the first year of a self-insured program legal
fees would amount to between $4,000 and $5,000. However,
experience dict3tcs that legal services for a particular
insurance year <lo not peak unt'i 1 2~J to 3 years later due
to delays in filing of claims, subsequent proccedinp.s, etc.
Mr. lfoodruff nnticipatcs tiwt h<'!~inning with the third
year of n !;elf-insurnnce pl~lll legal costs would run between
$10,000 nn<l $15,000 per year. Jn t1ur cost comparison we
have, thcr«.?forc, cstim11tcd an average of $10.,000 annually.
3. Claims :\<lj11~tin~ S~1·vic-f•s: Unsc<l on thC' General Counsel's
CXJlC'rfrnt~<. .. ,.,it-:-il'-otlu-;-r n1!<-'ncfrs that have ~clf-insur:1nce
progr:uns, we h:tvc c:;Um:&tcd l ... laii;is :1djusting costs at
$ 3, 0 0 0 . Tl d s i s t la<.' on" · i t <.'Ill for ,,. h it-h t h c r c i s no out.-
of .. poc kl •t cost under the <?Xi st i nr. Pl' I ic-)'.
t=iscal Pol iry Cummittt'C
ra1!<.~ 2
J:mua ry (>, l 97R
4.
s.
Districts' Stnff: We expect that Districts' staff time
ncc<l<~<l to administer a self-insurance plan would more
than double. llo"cvcr, it is difficult to :lnticipnte at
this time the actual clcric::il and administrative costs
that would he incurred and the amount indicated may be . conservative.
Claims and/or flC'cluctibles: Bnsed on the past four years'
claims e>.1Jcri cnce provided by the Districts' broker, we
have estimated nn annual claim cost under self-insurance
at $11,000. This is compared to approximately $2,500
annually to satisfy the deductible provision of the
current policy.
The Committee will recall that when the Districts' broker nttendcd a recent
meeting, he pointed out thnt the current underwriter, SAFECO, was the only
carrier that would include pollution and contamination protection coverage.
He has been unable to locate an underwriter that would provide this coverage
under a self-insured plan; however, the staff is of the opinion that such an
exclusion wc;mld be inconsequential. A typical contamination and pollution
exclusion endorsement of this type is attached hcre\ii th for the Commit tee's
information. One other point that the Corre:iittcc may wish to consider would
be a stop loss provision ~hich would provide for an aggregate limit of loss
... ..;
for the self-insured portion during the policy period over which all additional
losses would be covered on a first dollar basis by the carrier.
• T
•
Inasmuch as the current policy year does not expire until June 30, 1978, and the \..._)
potential savings by moving to a self-insured plan at this time would be nominal,
considering the added risk, it appears advisable at this time to delay a decision
o~ the matter. It is the staff's recommendation that the Committee consider the
following:
A.· Direct the staff to obtain further information on the feasibility
of liability self-insurance for the Districts.
B. Direct the staff to cxplo~e the feasibility of ·self-insurance
for workers compensation.
C. Direct the broker to obtain and submit a firm premium quote
for both a first dollar li:1bilit)' policy and n. self-insured
plan for 1978-79, no Inter than March 1, 1978, to enable
considcrntion of the desired mctho<l of coverage in conjunction
with budget determinations for the next fiscal year.
If the Committee concurs with the nhovc approach, the sta.ff.could secure the
assistance of an insurance consult~nt within its existing procurement authority.
i /f to;jr F in:1ncc
Jl·/S:jc
Premium
COIH'AIUSON OF EXIST
0
l::r. FIRST DOLLAR INSUHANCE
AND SELF-INSURANCE COVERAGE
Existing First Doll~r Covcr~gc
-$300,000. w/$250. Deductible
~66,599.
Sc lf-Covcr;1~c
$250,000. w/$50,000.
Scl f-lnsurcd Rt~tent ion
$36,000.
~egal F~es (~cncral C~~nsel) $ 2,000. $10,000.
$ 3,000.
$ 5,000.
$11'000.
$65,000.
-o-
Districts' Staff $ 2,000.
Claims or Deductible $ 2,500. .... •'· .· ... ._... . . -----
$73,099.
-
S.winqc; or
{f"f dt•d Cost)
$30,599.
($8' 000.)
($3,000.)
($3,000.)
($8,500.)
$ 8,099.
CONTAMINATION AND POLLUTION EXCLUSION
This policy provides no coverage for Bodily Injury or Property
Damage arising out of the following:
(1) The discharge, dispersal, release or escape, whether
• or not sudden and accidental, of oil or other petroleum
substance or derivative (including any oil refuse or
mixed with wastes} into or upon any watercourse or body
of water.
(2) The discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke,
vapors, soot fumes, acids, alkalisi toxic chemicals,
liquids or gases, waste materials or other irritants,
contaminants or pollutants into or upon land, the
atmosphere or any watercourse or body of water unless
such discharge, dispersal, release or escape is sudden
and accidental.
'·
\.
,.-" FORM 721
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
STATEMENT OF EXDNCMIC INTERESTS (PER CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE AOOPTED BY RFSOLUI'ION NO. 77-
DATED I /77)
'Ibis fonn is for designated employees filing annual
anniversary staterrents and for persons who have left
office or a designated position
The Wldersigned is a District Director governed by the provisions of
Resolution No. 77-, and require:l to file this Staterrent as a "designated
employee" thereunder.
I delcare that I am a duly (elected, appointed) rrember of the City Council
of ·the City of , thereby required to file annual
Statenents of F.conomic Interest pursuant to califomia Government Code
Sections 87200-87207. In said capacity, I further serve in the following
public offices, each of which have adopted local Conflict of Interest
Codes requiring stateJrents of econanic interest to be filed:
.I declare that the interests set forth on Fann 721 schedules, attached hereto,
include all reportable interests requirerl by State law and local codes which
apply to rre in each office I hold.
3. Office or Designated Position:
~--~~~~~~--~~~--------~-----
.~. Check the appropriate box:
[ ] This is my anniversary statenent. (Directors file within 30 days
after the anniversary of the date your tenn began, other designated
enplO~leeS by April 30) •
[ ) I left the above-named office or designated position as of
(date) • (File within 30 days of
~----~-=-::-r--.-------~~~ leaV111g office).
5. Period covered by the statenent:
to
I understand that investirents or interests in real prcperty owned by my spouse
or dependent child in ·which they have an interest of greater than $1,000.00 must.
be reported, and I have included. all such investnents or interests in real
property in this stateirent.
I declare under ~alty of perjury that I have used all reasonable diligence .. ·
in preparing this statem=nt and to the best of my knowledge it is true and
carplete.
Executoo on ----------·' 19_, at -------------·' California
Signature
y f
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
MAY 10~ 1978 -7:30 P.M.
JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID APRIL 11, 1978
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
41220
41221
41222
41223
41224
41225
41226
41227
41228
41229
41230
41231
41232
41233
41234
41235
'41236
41237
41238
41239
41240
41241
41242
41243
41244
41245
41246
41247
41248
41249
41250
41251
41252
41253
41254
41255
41256
41257
41258
41259
41260
41261
41262
41263
41264
41265
41266
41267
41268
41269
41270
41271
41272
41273
41274
41275
II A-1"
Admiral Corporation, Freight
William Alvarez & Company, Hardware
Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Repairs
Aqua Pipe & Supply Company, Rotor
Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies
Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Expense
Benz Engineering, Inc., Valve
Berkley Controls, Inc., Pump Repair
Black & Decker Mfg. Company, Small Tool Repair
Blue Diamond MateTiaJs, Asphalt Mix
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair
Brenner-Fielder & Associates, Inc., Compressor
CS Company, Pump Parts
California Panel & Veneer, Formica
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
Charles W. Carter Company, Pump Parts
Chevron, USA, Inc., Gasoline
City Wide Office Machinery, Calculator Repairs
Clark Dye Hardware, Small Hardware
College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Control Specialists, Inc., Regulator
Cook Drafting Supply, Drafting Supplies
Copeland Motors; Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County of Orange, OCERS Exams
County Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies
Deco, Electrical Supplies
Dunn.-Edwards Corporation, Paint
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Eco Air Products, Filters
Enviro Development Company, JPL Evaluation
Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts
Fisher Scientific Company, ·Filters
Five States Plumbing, Inc., Plumbing
Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware
Clifford A. Forkert, Engineering Services
City of Fullerton, Water '
Gardner Denver Company, Compressor Parts
~eneral Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies
General Telephone Company, Phone
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump
Allan Hancock Foundation, Publications
Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower Parts
Haul-Awny Containers, Trash Disposal
Henry Radio, Inc., Antenna
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires
Honeywell, Inc., Small Tools
Howard Supply Company, Rope
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Equipment Rentals
Instrumentation Specialities, Engineering Supplies
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pump Parts
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
9.56
130.51
3,065.84
43.18
857.16
796.40
187.06
563.92
22.77
21.90
171. 99
281.54
1,025.63
196.74
106.00
371. 00
4,345.47
164.35
32.54
81.58
25.09
2,706.39
105.45
332.65
148.40
1,253.24
1,455.20
405.64
772.53
221.23
466.38
32.32
1,200.00
789.70
80.99
150.00
296.54
975.50
15.78
49.90
65.30
1,645.97
6,682.50
647.93
54.56
27.77
550.00
34.93
361. 82
300.87
274.33
10.46
182.53
184.98
2.75
50.35
"A-1"
JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID APRIL 11, 1978
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
41276
41277
41278
41279
41280
41281
41282
41283
·' 41284
41285
41286
41287
41288
41289
41290
41291
41292
41293
41294
41295
41296
41297
41298
41299
41300
41301
41302
41303
41304
41305
41306
41307
41308
41309
41310
41311
41312
41313
41314
41'315
41316
41317
41318
41319
41320
41321
41322
41323
41324
41325
41326
41327
41328
41329
41330
"A-2"
Keenan Pip~ & Supply Company, Hardware
Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Blade Cut
King Bearing., Inc., Bearings & Pump Parts
LA Chemical, Chlorine
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies
L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniforms & Towel Rental
Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing
.Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Raincoats & Boots
Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lighting
McCoy Ford, Pulley
McHaster-Carr Supply Company, Valve
Mar Vac Electronics, Power Tubes
C. J. Mattern & Associates, Pump Parts
Mine Safety Appliances Company,· Aspirator Bulb
Morgan Equipment Company, Machinery
Motorola, Inc., Communication Equipment
Nasco, Freight Charge
N. B. Products, Air Hose Kits
Orange County Flag & Banner, Flags·
Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp
Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Pipe Fittings
Oritex, Inc., Operating Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company, Phone
Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts
M. C. Patten Corporation, Pump Parts
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies
Pickwick Paper Products, Paper Products
Postmaster, Postage
Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Register, Subscription
Relief Printing Company, Business Cards
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Repair
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Shamrock Supply, Hand Tools
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint & Supplies
Signal-Flash Company, Barricades
Southern California Edison Company, Power '
South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings
Southern California Water Company, Water
Southern Counties Oil Company, Diesel Fuel
Southwest Plywood & Lumber, Lumber
Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump Parts
Sunnen Products Company, Honing Oil & Parts
The Suppliers, Hand Tools
Surveyors Service Company, Tape Rules
J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash
TFI Building Materials, Flange
Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies
Travel Buffs, Air Fare
Truck Auto Supply Company, Truck Parts
Tustin Water Works, Water
United Industrial Supply, Inc., Vacuum Gauge
United Parcel Service, UPS
AGEND~ ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
2,476.11
74.20 ~
520.67
2,300.73
458.82
1,233.76
15.38
248.38
81.15
22.24
42.'67
23.32
999.32
6.36
279.99
346.94
1.34
390.00
110. 76
25.03
119. 93
87.24
46.92
980.48
77.88
162.18
69.85 v
500.00
31.80
83.70
42.00
44.52
412.83
2,428.80
328.06
488.66
592.17
194.95
47,318.86
336.01
6.00
1,927.72
126.35
913.01
141.19
189.51
36.32
728.20
23.73
115.87
402.00
755.00 v
19.20
131.28
29.07
"A-2"
JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID APRIL 11, 1978
·WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
41331
..._,r' 41332
41333
41334
41335
41336
41337
41338
41339
41340
41341
41342
41343
41344
"A-3"
United States Equipment, Inc., Filter
Utilities Supply Company, Hand Tools
VBA Cryogenics, Special Gas
Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings
Valvate Associates, Valve
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Wallace & Tiernan, Tubing
John R. Waples, Odor Control Consultant
Waudesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Wire & Alloys
Bruce E. Witcher, Deferred Comp. Interest
Russell Wold, Replace Employee Mileage Warrant
Worthington Pump Corporation, Pump Casing
Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproductions
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 549.48
98.94
81.41
515.64
470.64
1,451.65
246.66
218.10
1,439.65
448.38
21.29
228.69
1,949.97
76.05
$112,380.13
".~-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 11, 1978
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
41209
41210
41211
41212
41213
41214
41215
41216
41217
41218
41219
II A-4"
Bassett Office Furniture Company, Office Furniture
Butier Engineering, Inc., Contract Management P2-23.
John Carollo Engineers, Pl-16 Instruction Program
Daily Pilot, Legal Ads A-088, A-089, A-090
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment P2-23
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, EIS/EIR
McBain Instruments, Inc., Lab Equipment
Miyake-Leece-Wood Associates, Warehouse Architects
James M. Montgomery, I-IR Design.
The Register, Legal Ads P2-14-1A, PW-064A
Valley Cities Supply, Bench Grinders
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 2,741.45 v
9,946.35
5,428.30
32.23
1,919.66
1,197.66
1,065.42
3,974.75
14,800.00
114.38.
213.74
$ 41,433.94
$153,814.07
"A-4"
.INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIUS PAID APRIL 11, 1978
, WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR or
41205 Orange County Electronics Corporation, Use Chg. Refund
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTALY
IN FAVOR OF
41206 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Pipe Tests 3-20
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. S & 6
::~SUSPENSE FUND
IN FAVOR OF
41207
41208
"B"
Portigal & Hammerton, 5-19 Litigation
Register, Legal Ad 5-8-R
TOTAL DISTRICT 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
$
$
$
$
AMOUNT
24.20
24.20
AMOUNT
2,800.00
2,800.00
AMOUNT
161.00
115. 00
276.00
"B II
JOINT OPERATINr. CLAIHS PAID APRIL 25, 1978
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
41411
41412
41413
41414
41415
41416
41417
41418
41419
41420
41421
41422
41423
41424
41425
41426
41427
41428
41429
41430
. c. 41431
41432
41433
41434
41435
41436
41437
41438
41439
41440
41441
41442
41443
41444
41445
41446
41447
41448
41449
41450
41451
41452
41453
41454
41455
41456
41457
41458
41459
41460
41461
"C-1"
Allied Colloids, Polymer
Almquist Tool & Equipment, Tools
American Chcmi"cal· Society, Technical Journal
American Lock & Supply, Inc., Padlocks
The Anchor Packing Company, Packing Materials
Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Berkley Controls, Inc., Cable Repair
Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies
Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete Mix
W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage
Building News, Inc. , Safety Publications
C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Parts & Repair
Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies
Cal-State Seal Company, 0-Rings ·
California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair
Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil Removal
College Lumber Company, Inc. , Lumber
Compressor Products, Compressor Parts & Repair
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies
Continental ti1emical Company, Chlorine
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water
Daily Industrial Tools, Saw Kit
Deco, Electrical Supplies
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Company, Glass
Dennis Printers, Inc., Printing
Derbys Topsoil, Sand & Rock
Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill
Dunn-Edwards Corporation, Paint
Eastman, Inc., Coat Racks
Electric Machinery Mfg. Company, Pump Parts .
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Essick Machinery Company, Valve Part
Eureka Bearing Supply, Gaskets
Filter Supply Company, Filters
Fisher Scientific Company, Lab Supplies
Flo-Systems, Pump Parts
Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware
'
Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies & Processing
City of Fullerton, Water
General Telephone Company, Phone
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldcnwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal
Gould Inc-Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Fittings
Hach Chemical Company, Inc., Lab Testing
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., PUmp
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Howard Supply Company, Valve & Small Hardware
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 24' 960. 00 ~ .J
31.80 ~
38.00
54.95
455.66
257.85
291. 52
35.00
255.16
476.40
22.20
10.50
875.00
211.12
17.17
135.90
198.70
74.62
470.58
11.39
3,122.76
97.67
213.49
544.50
46.00
1~~::~ ~
32.46
691. 75
439.90
185.00
56.60
80.33
193.31
3,000.00
16.20
84.59
15.71
646.28
2,772.70
168.91
770.95
6.83
209.35
32.58
5,873.85
68.77
99.70
336.34
765.00
950.29(_;
"C-1"
JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID APRIL 25, 1978
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
41462
41463
41464
41465
41466
41467
41468
41469
41470
41471
41472
41473
41474
41475
41476
41477
.41478
41479
41480
41481
41482
41483
41484
41485
41486
41487
41488
41489
41490
41491
41492
41493
41494
41495
41496
41497
41498
41499
41500
41501
41502
41503
41504
41505
41506
41507
41508
41509
41510
41511
41512
41513
41514
41515
41516
41517
-: .. ~'C-2"
City of Hu~tington Beach, Water
ICN Life Sciences Group, Water Sampling
International Harvester Company, Truck Parts·
J & T Equipment, Fire Hose
Jensen Instrument Company, Control Switch
Janice Johnson, Employee Mileage
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearings & Sheave
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings
Donald E. Kinney, Employee Mileage
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware
LA Chemical, Weed Killer
LA Liquid Handling Systems, Pump Parts
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies
L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform & Towel Rental
Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing
Leonards Carpet Service, Carpet Installation
McBain Instruments, Lab .Supplies
Carol McGavran, Employee Mileage
McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Ladders
Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Manuals
Paul A. Mitchell, Travel Expense Reimbursement
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers
Nalco Chemical.Company, Chemical Solution
National Lumber Supply, Hardware
Occidental College-Cashier, Boat Service
Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Lumber
Orange County Chemical Company, Chloride
Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamps
Pacific Telephone Company, Phone
M. C. Patten Corporation, Pressure Gauge
Paul Munroe Hydraulics, Valve Parts
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies
Pet Country, Lab Supplies
Pickwick Paper Products, Paper Products
Postmaster, Postage
Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice
Productool, Inc. , Machine Parts
Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage
Republic Engines, Bearings
SGA Scientific, Inc., Meter Part
Safety Research Corporation, Asphalt Coating
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Small Tools
See Optics, Safety Glasses
Sherwin NilliamsCompany, Paint Supplies
SIDU Mfg. Company, Sewer Plug
John Sigler, 'Employee Mileage
Smart & Final Iris Company, Paper Products
Southern California Edison Company, Power
South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings
Southern California Gas Company, Gas
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water
Spiral Binding Company, Inc., Ring Binders
Stauffer Chemical Company, Chemicals
Steverson Brothers, Truck Scales
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
20.77
40.00
32.03
84.00
225.15
7.50
375.80
1,314.08
27.30
32. 22 .
.210. 68
229.33
291.07
1,210.59
10.87
1,067.68
65.53
16.50
321.41
29.56
91.21
318.00
2,888.12
438.33
500.00
109.64
106.85
28.70
254.00
175.33
26.93
994.30
46.61
114. 90
500.00
15.90
103.09
58.50
107.49
204.02
62.51
132.73
17.59
134.83
59.36
93.97
144.98
34.02
58.93
14,248.28
15.31
2,310.17
262.49
65.93
3,325.07
63.00
"C-2"
JOINT OPERATING CLAIMS PAID APRIL 25, 1978
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
41518
41519
41520
41521
41522
41523
. 41524
41525
41526
41527
41528
41529
41530
41531
41532
41533
41534
41535
41536
41537
41538
41539
41540
41541
. "C-3"
Super Chem .Corporation, Detergent
The Suppliers, Small Tools
TFI Building Ma.tcrial s, Fl angcs
Tatkin Company, Electrical Supplies
Taylor-Dunn; Battery Chargers
John D. Thomas, Deferred Compensation
C. 0. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene
Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint
Tony's Building ~~terials, Inc., Brick
Travel Buffs, Air Fare
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline
US Instrument Rentals, Equipment Rental
United Parcel Service, UPS
United States Equipment, Inc., Safety Switch
Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools
VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage
Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Warren McVeigh & Griffin, Insurance Study
Russell Wold, Employee Mileage
Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Fees
Xerox Computer Services, Computer Service
Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
408 .10
173.51~
68.56
82.68
78.51
13,607.48
172.99
155.63
70.38
675.00
491.76
31.79
95.40
31.09
98.46
183.89
31.50
1,197.65
472.94
1,881.34
82.08
2,828.50
4,190.54
1,661. 80
. -
$113,133. 77 v
"C-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 25, 1978
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
~ 41396
41397
41398
41399
41400
41401
41402
41403
41404
41405
41406
41407
41408
41409
.41410
· · "C-4"
Ace Automotive Equipment Distributor, Valve Grinding Machine
John Carollo Engineers, Pl-16 Instruction Program
John Carollo Enginecrs/rirecley & Hanson, P2-23 Constr. Service
Consolidated Reproductions, Plans P2-23-6
Data Tech, Battery Charger
Graybar Electric Wholesale, Pump
LBWS, Inc., Hoist
McBain Instruments, Inc., Lab Equipment
NASA-Pasa.:lena Office, JPL/ACTS
·.Perkin .. Elmer Corporation, Lab Equipment
Scient.ffic Products, Lab Equipment
Skipper & Company, Stop Notice Release J-6-1 & PW-055
Southern California Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-3
Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-23-5
VWR Scientific, Testing Equipment
TOTAL C.ORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
·,·
· AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 4,293.00
7,379.32
21,727.42
4,915.33
96.34
540.60
103.35
121.96
1,877.08
2,824.91
270.30
23,495.24
31.50
22.50
90.63
$ 67,789.48
$ 180,923.25
"C-4"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 25, 1978
. WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
41389 State of California, Annex 17 Processing Fee
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
41390 Lowry and Associates, Engineering 2-19, 2-20
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY
IN FAVOR OF
41391
41392
41393
City of Anaheim, Sewer Repair 3-20-2
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering 3-22-1
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing 3-22-1
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND
WARRANT NO.
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
41394 State of California, Annex 8 Processing Fee
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM. #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 95.00
$ 95.00
AMOUNT
$ 568.68
$ 568.68
$ 663.68
AMOUNT
$ 1,615.78
3,149.06
1,295.00
$ 6,059.84
AMOUNT
$ 95.00
$ 95.00
"D-1"
·INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID APRIL 25, 1978
i...,.,;·
.WARRANT NO.
·DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND
.····•t.N FAVOR OF
41395 State of California, Annex 73 Processing Fee
TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND
·.
-. ;'D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 95.00
$ 95.00
"D-2"
"E"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-80
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-36, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION,
JOB NO. J-13-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION
.NO. 78-36, APPROVING PLANS. AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2, TO
CHANGE THE BID DATE FOR SAID PROJECT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 3 of Resolution No. 78-36, approving plans and
specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m.,
June 1, 1978, at which time said be publicly opened and read; and,"
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "E"
'iF"
. . ·· . ..
April 28, 1978
036
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Wayne Sylvester
Ted Hoffman
Bid Specification A-089 (Rebid)
One· tr) 3/4· ·t·on· -c·ab" & ·chas·s·1·s
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
1714) 540·2910
(714) 962·24 I I
Sealed bids were· opened on April 25, 1978, for furnishing and
delivering one (l) 3/4 ton cab & chassis.
The tabulations are as follows:
Dealer Make Lo·c·at·ion Bi·d Price -
Santa Ana Dodge Dodge Santa Ana $ 5618.00
Theodore Robins Ford Ford Costa Mesa 5710.22
McCoy Ford Ford Anaheim 5798.66
Burch Ford Ford La Habra 5815.05
Trans-West Ford Ford Fontana 5825.14
It is recommended the award be made to Santa Ana Dodge, low
bidder, for their bid proposal amount of $5,618.00 including
sales tax.
Ted Ho f
Chief of & Property
Concur, ~fi&h
TH/yh
AGENDA ITEM #lOCn) -ALL DISTRICTS "F"
"G"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ..
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
April 27, 1978
037
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92"
(714) 540-2910 ~
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
. MEMORANDUM
Wayne Sylvester
Ted Hoffman
Bid Specification No. A-091
. Three ( 3} on·e Ton· c·ab" ·&· Chas·sis
(714) 962-24 ti
Sealed bids were opened on April 25, 1978, for furnishing and
delivering three (3) one ton cab· & chassis.
The tabulations are as follows:
Dealer ·Make Lo·ca·tton Bid Price
Theodore Robins Ford Ford Costa Mesa $17,276.94
Santa Ana Dodge Dodge Santa Ana 17,490.00
McCoy Ford Ford Anaheim 17,970.82
Burch Ford Ford La Habra 18,151.89
Trans-West Ford Ford Fontana 20,342.39
It is recommended the award be made to Theodore Robins Ford,
low bidder, for their bid proposal amount of $17,276.94 in-
cluding sales tax. Sufficient fund~ have .. bee~~udgeted for these
vehicles in the amount of $22 ,856. 00. ·· ·· ·-·
Existing bodies on vehicles for replacement will be transferred
to new~un s District forces. ~
V/ _,/i~~·~-
Ted Ho fma
Chief of Procurement & Property
W.N.~~rke, Superintendent
TH/yh
AGENDA ITEM #10(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G"
~
TLW:pj
05/03/78
"H-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-81
ADOPTING REVISED GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970
AS AMENDED
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT-
.ING REVISED DISTRICTS' GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF
1970, AS AMENDED, AND REPEALING GUIDELINES
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 77-1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of January, 1977, pursuant to
Resolution No~ 77-1, the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of
Orange County did adopt Districts' Guidelines Implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act, which Guideline~
were based upon State Environmental Guidelines promulgated
by the Secretary of Resources; and,
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.
requires that local environmental procedures shall be
consistent with State Environmental Guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, from time to time, these Districts have here-
tofore amended said District Guidelines to conform with
changes in the California State laws and/or regulations;
and,
WHEREAS, the State Legislature adopted substantive changes
to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, effective January 1, 1978.
~
/\GE~JDA ITEM #10 CF) -l\LL DISTRICTS "H-1"
"H-2"
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of
Orange County, Californi~,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Districts' "Guidelines Implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended",
adopted by Resolution No. 77-1 on January 12, 1977, is hereby
repealed and said Guidelines are of no further force and
effect; and,
Section 2. That the Distri_cts' "Guidelines Implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended",
dated May 1, 1978, a copy of which is attached hereto and
by reference incorporated herein, be, and is hereby
approved and adopted for the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
-2-
AGENDA ITEM #10(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-82
AU1HORIZING EXECUTION OF EASEMENT DEED TO CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH RE 1\11 DENI NG AND IMPROVEMENT OF
HAMILTON STREET BRIDGE CROSSING
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF EASEMENT DEED TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IN
CONNECTION WITii THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF
HAMILTON STREET BRIDGE CROSSING
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain Easement Deed dated May 10, 1978, wherein a slope ·
easement of approximately 600 square feet on the Districts' 30-foot utility corridor,
is heneby granted to the City of Huntington Beach in order to provide access
\_,,I to the Santa Ana River which was blocked by the City's widening and improvement
of the Hamilton Street bridge crossing; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is
more particularly described and sho'l.ffl on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Easement Deed is hereby granted for no fee; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
Cotmty Sanitation District No. I be authorized and directed to .execute said ·Easement
Deed on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
AGENDA ITEM #lOCG) -ALL DISTRICTS II J"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-110
~~~~~~~~~~~
C.O. NO. 7
~~~~~---~~~~~~~
CONTRACTOR: Pasca 1 & Ludwig, Inc. DA TE Apr i 1 28, 1978
---~------~~~---~~~~---~----
JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGO of Improved Treatment at Plant 2 -P2-23-1
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~E~crlIX) $ 11, 376. 10
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
flt. The contractor provided 2_11 asphalt concrete on natural and installed utilities
for the first phase of site preparation for Districts• Administrative Office
trailer complex at Plant No. 2.
B.
C·.
Total cost for this added work $2,956.60
Original structural sections for paving were determined to be insufficient to
withstand unusual construction equipment loadings from subsequent work to be
performed in contracts following P2-23-l with the subgrade material encountered
during construction. The sections were revised to accorrmodate changed subgrade
conditions at the Banning and Bushard entrances. Time extension of 22 days.
Total cost for this added work $5,000.00
A revision was made to pipe support systems on the 611 and 10 11 sludge lines in
Harris and Hazel Tunnels including adding pipe anchor straps and changing the
specified unistrut pipe supports. The pipe supports as specified were inadequate
to support the imposed loads of the lines during their design operation. Field
changes were directed to correct these conditions. Time extension of 26 days.
Total cost for this added work $1,892.00
D. Mechanical piping supports as shown on the original contract drawings did not
provide for required anchorage necessary for interim operation of sludge lines
prior to installation of bar screens by District forces. Field directed modifi-
cations were ordered to secure system until screens are installed at a later
date.
Total cost for this added work $1,125.00
E. Sea 1 er was added to the redwood pane 1 s in gates at Banning and Bushard entrances.
Total cost for this added work $ 402.50
F. Because of inclement weather, the contractor is granted 17 days extension of
contract time.
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #!OCH) -ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS. AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
GRANT NO.~_C_-_06_-_1_0~73~_-_1_1_0 ____ ~
C.O. N0.~ __ 7 ____________ ~---
CONTRACTOR: Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. DATE April 28, 1978
--~--~-'---~----~-------
JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant 2 -P2-23-1
Summary of Contract Time:
Item B:
I tern C:
Item F:
22 Calendar Days for this added work
26 Calendar Days for this added work
17 Calendar Days for weather delays
Total Time Extensions this Change Order:. 65 Calendar Days
Contract Time Adjustments:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this C.O.
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
May 18, 1977
180 Calendar Days
November 13, 1977
65 Calendar Days
177 Calendar Days
357 Calendar Days
May 9, 1978
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (liiMXI)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: May 10, 1978 Approved:
$ 2,268,420.00
$ lt,910.72
$ 11,376. 10
$ 2,284,706.82
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By~~----~~------~~~---~--~ Chief Engineer
Contractor
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #lO(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
COUNTY 51\NlT/\TlON DISTRJClS OF ORANG[ COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 -l08'1 1t ELLIS AVUHJE
FOUNT Al N VALLEY, .CJ\L I FORNI A 9 2 l 0 8
GR J\N T N 0 • C -O 6 -I 0 73 -1 I O
C .O. N0.! __ 8 ____ ----~ .
CONTRACTOR: Pclscc'.ll & Ludwig, Inc.
~~--~---~~~--
OATE ____ Apri 1 1~_, __ 1~78 ____ _
~----J® .. • FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD of lmprov~d Treatment at Plilnt 2 P2-23-J
Amount of this Change Order (~~~) (DEDUCT) $~2}_· 74_) ___ _
In accord~ncc with contr~ct provisions, the following chnngcs in tf1c contr~ct
and/or contract work arc hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price arc hereby approved.
ITEM
-A-The compacted fill material for the berms along the flood wall was obtained fron
on-site sludge beds rather than the Santa Ana Riverbed. This m.:iterial \-1as tested
for compatibility of specified soil amendments lo those required by subsequent
agricultural analysis. The amendments were modified as a result of this testing
and the planting requirements \-Jere also modified. No time extensions requested.
Total cost this change ADD $ 1,648.68
-.;-, · 8. A portion of the required. irrigation system was omitted from contract drawings
c.
south of Plant 2 Main Entrance. This system had to be extended to cover specified
planting. No time extension requested.
Total cost this change ADD $ 754.89
Credit for variations in quantities of specified tree sizes furnished along the
berm behind the flood wall. Twenty-inch box trees were not available in the
numbers required for the project. No time extensions requested.
Total credit this change CREDIT $13,945.36
·o. The addition of 206 15-gallon trees in areas not specifically shown on the contract
drawings; specifically between Stations 5+80 and 3+46.
Total cost this change ADD $10,218.05
TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE CHANGE THIS CHANGE ORDER -CREDIT ($1,323.74)
No time extensions with this Change Order.
Board authorization date: M~y 10, 1978
·By __________________________ ~-----
Contractor
Original Contract Price $ __ 2_,_2_6_8_,4_2_0_._o_o ___ _
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 16,286.82
----~------~---
Th is Change ~OO'J (DEDUCT) $ (1,323.74)
-----~--~------------
Amended Contract Price $ 2 ,283, 383 .oa·
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ____ ~-----------~--~~--~---
Chief Engineer
~'L'' AGENDA ITEM #10(1) -ALL DISTRICTS "L"
~·
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -108~4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-110 --------
c.o. N0.~_9 ____ ~-------------
CONTRACTOR:~~Pa_s_c_a_l __ &_L_u_d_w_i~g~,~'"-c_. __________ __ DATE~------A~p~r_i_1 __ 28~, __ 1~97~8 _________ _
JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant 2 -P2-23-1
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) {DEDUCT) $ (3,515.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct
and/or contr~ct work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
I
ADJUSTMENT OF QUANTITIES
Contract I tern
(A) Additional ovcrexcavation and gravel refill -Bushard Enirance
Add 50 c.y. at $9.00/c.y. $450.00
(8) Additional paving at Road 11 G11 intersection with Hazel Tunnel
(D)
Add 1450 sf at 0.70 sf $1,015.00
Deleted compacted fill along Road 11 A11 along Santa Ana River
Channel
Deduct 3320 c.y. at $1.50 c.y.{$4,980.00)
TOTAL DEDUCT ($3,515.00)
Original Contract Price $ 2, 26S., 420. 00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 14,963.08
This Change (An~ {DEDUCT) $ (3,515.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 2 , 2 79 , 86 8 . 0 8
Board authorization date: May 10, 1978 Approved:
·~
•By
----------------------~--~~~--
Contractor
COUHTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
Chief Engineer
"M" AGE~DA ITEM #lO(J) -ALL DISTRICTS "M"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-83
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-23-1, AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-23-l AS
COMPLETE, AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT
AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., has complet~d the work
in accordance with the terms of the contract for FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT
FOR 75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-l, on the 9th of May,
1978; and,
Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' Engineers,
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 4. That Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, is hereby accepted as complete in accordance with
the terms of the contract therefor, dated May 18, 1977; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. I is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc.,
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Flood Wall and Site
Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, is
hereby approved; and,
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(K) ALL DISTRICTS "N-1"
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
i..,,_; County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute
said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11.
PASSED AND.ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
~'N-2~' AGENDA ITEM #10(K) -ALL DISTRICTS "N-2"
"0"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-84
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MODIFICATION
OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI-
FICATIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER
OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-066
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer
for MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. PW-066, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., June 1, 1978,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief
Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
ACiENDA ITEM #10(L) -ALL DISTRICTS "O"
"P"
County Sanatation Districts
of Orange County California
P.O. Box·8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA. 92708
Attention: Board of Directors
Dear Sirs:
April 13, 1978
I request annexation of my property at 315 South Mohler Drive,
Anaheim to County Sanatation District #2.
Enclosed please note a copy of my property deed.
JC:ac
Enclosure
John J. Carusillo
315 S. Mohler Dr.
Anaheim, CA. 92807"
(714) 637-1813
.AGENDA ITEM #lO(N) -DISTRICT 2 "P"
"Q"
L~'2' --U~ anaheim hills, inc.
April 6, 1978
Board of Directors of
County
Sanitation District No. 2
10844 Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Regarding: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION
Gentlemen:
Texaco Anaheim Hills Inc., respectfully request the
annexation of that certain 0.755 acres of real property,
owned by us and described in the legal description and
map, Exhibit "B" enclosed herein, into Sanitation Dis-
trict No. 2. Also enclosed are checks in the amount of
_ .$500.00 for the annexation filing fee, $25.00 for L.A.F.C.
and $9.5.00 for Board of Equalization.
A copy of the environmental impact (EIR-80) for Anaheim
Hills Development was transmitted to you in July, 1974
for Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 2, along with a supple-
ment to EIR-80.
Very: truly yours,
AGENDA ITEr1 ~~lO(o) -DISTRICT 2
380 ANMIEIM HILLS AOAO, ANAH(;IM, CALIFOUNIA 9,807, PHONE 171419!>8·2000
"(J" ":I
"R-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-85-2
MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK,
CONTRACT NO. 2-19
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK,
CONTRACT NO. 2-19, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the project concerning which this determination is made
is described as follows:
RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19
Section 2. That, whereas, an Initial Study, which said study is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", of the environmental effects of said project has been
undertaken and completed by the District, and the results thereof have been
reviewed by the Board; and,
Section 3. That for the following reasons, it is hereby found that said
proj'ect will not have a significant effect on the environment:
(a) It is not in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have
been adopted by the conununity where the project is to be located.
(b) It does not have a substantial and demonstrable aesthestic effect.
(c) It will not substantially effect a rare or endangered species of
animal or plant, or habitat of such a species.
(~) It does not cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species.
(e) It does not breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control.
. AGENDA ITEM #lQ(p) -DISTRICT 2 "R-1"
"R-2"
(f) It will not result in a substantial detrimental effect on air
or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.
(g) It does not involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water.
(h) It could not cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltration.
(i) It could not expose people or structures to major geologic hazards.
(j) It is not likely to generate growth.
Section 4. That the Secretary be, and is hereby authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid Ini tfa.l Study at
the District's office to be available for public inspection and copying.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
AGENDA ITFM #10(p) -DISTRICT 2
-2-
'
"R-2"
. l.._,I
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This form shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, S, ~· 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, dated January 12, 1977.
·_Title and Location of Project Richfield and Orchard Suh-trunks, !;anitation OjstTic~
. .
No. 2, located on Richfield Road and Kellogg Drive between Orangethorpe Avenue and
La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
.
Desc~iption of Project The purpose is to relieve the Atwood Subtrunk and direct
flaws to the Santa Ana River Interceptor, The Richfie.ld_5nbtrnnk i ~ 24.,5 I F •'£
39" VCP and 890 L. F. of 24" VCP. The Orchard Snhtnmk j s 1502 L, F, of 27" VCP and
".,/ 450 L. F. of 24·u vcp
•
GUIDELINES
;1~ Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 2S?
• Yes_x_ No __
(If activity does not qualify as project 1 do not complete remainder of form)
2. Does the project qualify as:
.a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Ministerial (Section SJ Yes No x
Emergency (Section 13) Yes__ No _x_
A ~easibility or planning study (Section 31) Yes No_x_ .
Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 42) Yes_ No_!.
Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency. (Section 33)
Yes_ No x
(If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
-...,,,_;'
"R-3" . AGENDA ITEM #!Q(p) -DISTRICT 2
EXHIBIT "A-.1"
"R-3"
··,-1
·~: I
I
. ., I
. I
~ .
If there is no affinnativc action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study procedures
A. Evaluating Environmental Sign~ficanc~ (See Section 32)
' 1. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as per the following:
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No _z_
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes____ No__!_
c. Will it substantially effe~t a rare or endangered species
of animal or plant~ or haqi~at of such a species? Yes __ No x
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species?
Yes No x
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No x
£: Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Yes No --A.·
g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
h.
i.
Yes No ___z...· .
Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes · No x --.
Could it.expose people or structures to.major geologic
hazards? Yes__ No ·x
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No..!_
If the answer is yes to any of the above, destribe in detail. . .
•
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact. Report
m~y be required.
.4.
• • If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown
in the "Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.of
1970 as Amended"
.
"R-4" AGE~pA ITEM #lp~\(81 ;: »)_~T.R I C:T 2 . ·"R-4"
. -.. •
S. If an Environmental Impact Report is required. explain below procedures in
caus~ng preparation of same.
Recommend Boa~d ~o instruct staff to prepare a Negative Declaration and file
-·--for a 10-day pubUc .review period prior to Roard cons.id~+ation
.•
7
.· . , '~. ;/,/j <~--{> Evaluation made by / // )/>" ,,,~,.~ /,./ / / ... -/,,,."' ·
/.,,/
~·
"R-5" ·
Signature ' Dennis M. Reid. Senior Engineer.
AGE~DA ITEM #lQ(p) DISTRICT 2
EXHIBIT "A-3"·
9/7/77
Date
"R-5"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-86-2
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RICHFIELD
SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, District's
Engineers, for construction of RICHFIELD SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-19, are hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be
authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
AGENDA ITEM #lQ(Q) -DISTRICT 2
.~
RESOLUTION NO. 78-87-2
MAKING.A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE ORCHARD (KELLOGG)
SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20
. . ~ • j . ~ ! l ~ '
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION· DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY·, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE ORCHARD (KELLOGG)
SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE
nlEREOF
* ~ * * * * * * * * * * *
1be Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 'lbat the project concerning which this determination is made
·is described as follows:
ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20
Section 2. That, whereas, an Initial Study, which said study is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", of the environmental effects of said project has been
\._/ tmdertaken and completed by the District, and the results thereof have been
reviewed by the Board; and,
"T-1'~
Section 3. 1bat for th~ following reas9ns, it is hereby found that said
project will not have a significant effect on the environment:
(a) It is not in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have
been adopted by the .community where the project is to be located •.
~
(b) It does not have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect.
(c) It will not substantially effect a rare or endangered species of
anim_al or plant, ·or habitat of such a species.
(d) It does not cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife·species.
(e) It does not breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control.
ACiENDA ITEr1 #10(R) -DISTRICT 2 "T-1"
(f) It will not result in a substantial detrimental effect on air
or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.
(g) It does not involve t~e possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water.
(h) It could not cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltration.
(i) It could not expose people or structures to major geologic hazards.
(j) It is not likely.to generate growth.
Section 4. 111.at the Secretary be, and is hereby authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution .and of the aforesaid Initial Study at
the District's office to be available for.public inspection and copying.
"T-2".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeti.ng held May 10, 1978.
•
AGENDA ITEM #10(R) -DISTRICT 2
-2-
'
"T-2"
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .
This form shall be completed to comply with the·. Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As-Amended and as adopted by the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, S, 6~ 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California. dated January 12. 1977. ·
Title and Location of Project Richfield and Orchard Suh-trunks, Sanitation Distric"" . .
No. 2, located on Richfield Road and Kellogg Drive between Orangethorpe Avenue and
La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------·
Dcs~ription of Project The purpose is to relieve the Atwood Subtrunk and direct
flaws to the Santa Ana River Interceptor, The Richfield Subtnmk ·; s 2475 I. E cf
3Y" VCP and 890 L.F. of 24" VCP. · The Orchard Snbtrunk is 1502 L.F, of 27" VCP and
'.-1 450 L. F. of 24" vcp
..... ~) ..
GUIDELINES
~1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 2S?
• Yes__x_ No __
(If activity does not qualify as project~ do not complete remainder of fQrm)
2. Does the project qualify as:
a. Ministerial (Section SJ Yes No x
b. Emergency (Section 13) Yes_ No_x_
c. A ~easibility or planning study (Section 31) Yes~ ·. No_x_
d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 42) Yes__ No~
e.. Involves anothe.r agency which constitutes the lead. agency. (Section :..3~l-.:•.: ... :··
Yes No x -(If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
~scssment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
"T-3" AGENDA I.TEM #10(R) DISTRICT 2 "T-3"
EXHIBIT "A-.1"
If there is no affinnative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study pro~cdures
A. Evaluating Environmental Sign~ficance (Sec Section 32)
,
1. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as per the following:
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No __!._
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes_ No_!_
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species·
of animal or plant, or hapitat of such a species? Yes __ No x
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species?
Yes No x ·
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No x
f: Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Yes No ~X-·
g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
h.
i.
Yes No __..!.·· .
Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No x -·
Could it expose people or structures "to major geologic
hazards? Yes ~-No ...:..!.._
;. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No~
If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail •
..
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact. Report
may be required.
. 4. ' If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown
in the "GuidcU ncs Impl cmenting the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as Amended"
"T-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(R) -DISTRICT 2 "T-4"
· EXHIBIT "A-2"
..
. s. · If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in
causing preparation of same.
Reconunend Board to instruct staff to prepare a Negative Decl~ration and file
for a 10-day public review period prior to Board consideration
.· 7 -
// . c:'f;,:4 <.,?.
Evaluation made by / //)/;N ,,~~.... // / / /~/ 9/7/77
Signature I Dennis M. Reid, Seni6r Engineer Date . .
"T-5" AGENDA ITEM #10(R) -DISTRICT.2 "T-5"
EXHIBIT "A-3" ·
II lJ"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-88-2
APPROVING PLANS AND·SPECIFICATIONS FOR ORCHARD
(KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR ORCHARD (.KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry & Associates, District's
Engineers, for construction of ORCHARD (KELLOGG) SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-20,
are hereby approv~d and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be
authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
AGENDA ITEM #lOCs) -DISTRICT 2 "U"
"V"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-89-2
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FROM
CITY OF PLACENTIA RE CONTRACT NO. 2-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF GRANT DEED FROM CITY OF PLACENTIA RE
CONTRACT NO. 2-19
. *************
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain Grant Deed dated March 21, 1978, wherein an easement
in the vicinity of Richfield Road between Orangethorpe Avenue and the Atwood Channel
for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, is
hereby accepted from the City of Placentia; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is
more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "8", attached hereto and
made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of
Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19; and,
Section 4. That said Deed is granted at no cost to the District; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 be authorized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the Official
Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978 •
•
AGENDA ITEM #lOCr) -DISTRICT 2 "V"
"W"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-90-2
AlITHORIZING EXECUTION OF PIPE LINE LICENSE AGREEMENTS
WITH THE KfCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
RE CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19 AND 2-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PIPE LINE LICENSE AGREEMENTS
WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACTS NOS. 2-19
AND 2-20
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Pipe Line License Agreements, dated .March 1, 1978,
wherein The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company grants to County Sanitation
District No. 2 the right to construct the Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-19,
through The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right-of-way in the
vicinity of Richfield Road, southerly of Orangethorpe Avenue; and to construct the
Orchard (Kellogg) Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20, through their right-of-way in the
vicinity of Kellogg Drive, southerly of Orangethorpe Avenue, are hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment in the amount of $300.00 ($150.00 for each License)
for said right-of-way is hereby authorized; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Pipe Line License Agreements on behalf of
the District, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May IO, 1978.
AGENDA .ITEM #lO(u) -DISTRICT 2 "W"
RESOLUTION NO. 78-92-3
MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE WESTSIDE FORCE
MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE•COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE
WESTSIDE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT
NO. 3-13-1, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1be Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange
Co\Dlty, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
~ i ~ I' 1 ,,. • .,
Section 1. That the project concerning which this determination is made
is described as follows:
WESTSIDE FORCE MAIN, SECOND UNIT, CONTRACT NO. 3-13-1
Section 2. That, whereas, an Initial Study, which said study is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", of the environmental effects of said project has been
~ undertaken and completed by the District, and the results thereof have been
"X-1"
reviewed by the Board; and,
Section 3. That for the following reasons, it is hereby found that said
project will not have a significant effect on the environment:
(a) It is not in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have
(b)
(c)
been adopted by the community where the project is to be located •
• It does not have a substantial and demonstrable aesthestic effect.
It will not substantially effect a rare or endangered species of
anim~l or plant, or habitat of such a species.
(d) It does not cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife· spe.cies.
(e) It does not breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(v) -DISTRICT 3 "X-1"
"X-2"
(f) It will not result in a substantial detrimental effect on air
or wat"er quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.
(g) It does not involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water.
(h) It could not cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltration.
(i) It could not expose people or structures to major geologic hazards.
(j) It is likely to generate growth. The proposed project will
accommodate existing and approved developments in Seal Beach,
Los Alamitos, Cypress and La Palma that have already been through
the CEQA process.
Section 4. That the Secretary be, and is hereby authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid Initial Study at
the District's office to be available for public inspection and copying.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
/\GENDA ITEM #lO(v) -DISTRICT 3
-2-
"X-2"
...
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
11tis form shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, dated January 12, 1977.
Title and Location of.Project
---------------------~~~----------~----~~~-
Westside Force. Main, Second Unit, Contract
No. 3-13-1
..
Desc,::iption of Project The proposed project consists of a 30" force main
running from the Seal Beach Pump Station at Seal Beach Blvd. along
_Westlt}inster Blvd. to Rancho St. 1n Westminster. The ·line will have
"'-' a rated capacity of 19 MGD.
\.,,,,,,/
GUIDELINES
.1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 2S?
· Yes X No
(If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form)
2. Does the project qualify as:
a. Ministerial (Section SJ Yes No X
b. Emergency (Section 13) Yes__ No X
c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 31) Yes No X -
d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(~ection 42) Yes____ No X
e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 33)
Yes No X -(If yes hns been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
·Assessment/Environmental JQpact Report or Negative Decl~ration need not b~.
prepared. Compl etc and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Mam.>~l.) .
."X-3" AGENDA ITEM #lO(v) -DISTRICT 3 "X-3"
EXHIBIT "A-1 11 •
If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study pro~edures
A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 32)
,
1. Will the project hnve any significant effect on the environment
as per the iollowing:
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No X
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes No X
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species·
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes No X
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species?
Yes No X
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No X
£: Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Y~s __ No X .
g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
Yes No X ----h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No X -.
i. Could it expose people or structures "to major geologic
hazards? Yes No X
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes X No
If the answer is yes to any of the above, des-cribe in detail.
The prop~sed project.will accommodate existing and approved
developments in Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, Cypress and La Palma
that have already been through the CEQA process.
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report
may be required.
..
· 4. If there is no sir,nificant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C a.s shown
in the "Guidelines Ir:lplemcnting the California Environmental Quality Act of \,,.)
1970 as Amended" ·
"X-4" AGENDA ITEM #lOCvj DISTRICT 3 "X-Ll II
. EXHIBIT "A-2"
• ~ C> ....
s.
•
..
"X-5"
If zn Environmental Impact Report is required, ex1>lain below procedures in
causing prcp~ration of same.
Recommendation preparation of a Negative Declaration for the
project based on the findings of the Environmental Analysis.
. .
•
. .
•
. .
AGENDA ITEM #lO(v) -DISTRICT 3
EXHIBIT "A-3"
3/31/78
Date
. .
. .
. .
•
"X-5"
f
I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -1084~ ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/1\
-------~---~---------c. 0. NO. 3
----------------~---------------CONTRACTOR: Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture DATE April ?.7, 1~78
--~--------------~~~~----------
JOB: l<NOTT INTERCEPTOR, POR'l'ION OF REACH 7, CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~~~~) $ 7,983.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contri)ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: District's letter dated February 22, 1978.
ADD:
On the last contract (3-20-2), the Contractor
installed the closure type joint-in accordance
with the plans in lieu of a standard jqint. The
design engineer assumed the standard joint was
placed at the end of the previous project and
designed this project (3-20-3) accordingly.
Construct a field closure at the beginning of
the project, at Station 668+50.
The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of
contract time for the above item: 5 calendar days
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This Change Order
Total Time Extension
December 29, 1977
365 Calendar Days
December 28, 1978
5 Calendar Days
5 Calendar Days
370 Calendar Days
January 2, 1979
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) cxnarn:~
Amended Contract Price
$7,983.00
$ 3,880,113.00
$ (4,949.00)
$ 7,983.00
$ 3,883,147.00
Board authorization date: May l0, 1978 Approved:
·By
--------------~--------~~------
Contructor
COUIHY SAN IT AT I ON DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ____ ~~----------~~--~-------
Chief Engineer
"Y" AGEl'.JDA ITEM #J.O(w) -DISTRICT 3 "Y"
"Z-1 11
May 3, 1978
ST AF F REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108•.C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.c) 540-2910
(71 •) 962-2• 11
SEWER CONSTRUCTION IN DISTRICT NO. 3
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR -CONTRACT NO. 3-20-3
Contract No. 3-20-3 is the construction of a portion of the Knott
Interceptor Sewer located in Knott Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to
Orangethorpe Street in the City of Buena Park. This 72-inch
reinforced concrete pipe sewer, which is approximately 10,050-feet
in length, will be installed at an average depth of 16-feet.
The Contractor, Kordick & Rados, closed Knott Avenue to through
traffic on April 24, 1978 and, to date, has placed 250-feet of
pipe. Work has gone smoothly, although there have been some
problems with the ground conditions. Detours appear to be
working well, and there have been no accidents attributable to
the project.
The Directors will recall there was a great deal of concern on
the part of the merchants in the area regarding this construction.
Districts' staff has been in constant contact with these merchants
and both staff and the Contractor have endeavored to rectify their
concerns as quickly as possible. Almost without exception, the
merchants are pleased with the progress of the job and are most
complimentary concerning the Contractor and the way in which the
Districts' staff has been attuned to their needs and concerns.
In addition to working with the merchants, the Contractor and
staff have been working together to present a slide show and
safety poster contest to the students of the elementary schools
in the immediate area, as well as a slightly more advanced pro-
gram to the two junior high schools affected. These are designed
to acquaint the students with the large heavy equipment and the
absolute necessity to stay away from the project from a·safety
standpoint. To date, these programs have been very well received
by both the students and the faculties of the participating schools.
The estimated completion date for this project is December, 1978.
ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER -CONTRACT NO. "3-22-1
A second interceptor sewer, the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer,
·Contract No. 3~22-1, is also currently under construction in the
City of Buena Park. This 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe sewer
is approximately 2,700-feet in length and will be installed in
Orangethorpe Avenue between Western Avenue and Knott Avenue.
. .
AGENDA ITEM #lOCx) DISTRICT 3 ."Z-1"
"Z-2" .
Staff Report
"Sewer Construction"
May 3, 1978
Page Two
The Contractor for this project, Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., has
started pavement removal and the structure at Orangethorpe and
Western Avenues is under construction. Detours on this job
caused some problems in the beginning, but matters now seem to
be settled in this area.
The Districts' staff again provided those businesses in the path
of construction with a letter regarding the project and a brief
description of what will be taking place during the course of
the job. As on the Knott Avenue project, these merchants have
been given the names of people in the Districts' office to
contact in case of problems and staff will be visiting some of
those merchants as the job progresses.
Estimated completion date for this project is August, 1978.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(x) -DISTRICT 3 "Z-2"
·.
..
"AA-1"
RESOLtrrION NO. 78-93
MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE SANTA ANA RIVER
SIPHON AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE SANTA
ANA RIVER SIPHON AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the· project concerning which this determination is made
is described as follows:
SANTA ANA RIVER SIPHON
Section 2. That, whereas, an Initial Study, which said study is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", of the environmental effects of said project bas been
tmdertaken and completed by the Districts, and the results thereof have been
reviewed by these Poards; and
Section 3. That for the following reasons, it is hereby folDld that said
project will not have a significant effect on the environment:
(a) It is not in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the comrnuni ty where the pro.j ect is to be located.
(b) It does not have a substantial and demonstrable aesthestic effect.
(c) It will not substantially effect a rare or endangered species
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species.
(d) It does not ·cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species.
(e) It does not breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control.
AGENDA ITEM #lO(v) -DISTRICTS 5 ~·6 "AA-1"
(f) It will not result in a substantial detrimental effect on air
or·water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.
(g) It does not involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water.
(h) It could not cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltration.
(i) It could not expose people or structures to major geologic hazards.
(j) It is not likely to generate growth.
Section 4. That the Secretary be, and is hereby authorized and instructed
to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid Initial Study at
the Districts' office to be available for public inspection and copying.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 10, 1978.
AGENDA ITEM #lOCv) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6
-2-.
'I
INITIAL STUD'(
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This fonn shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the
Cowtty Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, dated January 12. 1977.
.
Title and Location of Project Sanitation Distric.t No. 5 Santa Ana' River Siphon
•
. ..
Desc}'"iption of Project Construction of a 33" siphon acros·s· the Santa Ana River bed
--~~~~~~~~~~~..:.-~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~-
·~bove Pacific Coast Highway
. .. .
GUIDELINES
.1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 2S?
2.
"""i
• Yes X No
(If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form)
Does
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
the project qualify as:
Ministerial (Section SJ Yes
.Emergency (Section 13) Yes __ .
No X
No X
A ~easibility or planning study (Section 31) Yes No X
Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 42) Yes_ No X
Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 33)
Yes No_x_
(If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
"AA-3" AGENDA ITEM #lO(v) -D.IST~ICTS 5 ·g, 6 "AA-3"
. ·EXHIBIT "A-1"
If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study procedures
A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (Sec Section 32)
' 1. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as per the £ollowi.ng:
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No X
b. Docs it have .R.substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes · No__x_
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species·
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes ~-No X
d. Docs it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migrato.ry fish or wildlife species?
Yes No X
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No _x_
f: Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for ~djoining
areas? Yes No X . -.-
g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
Yes No_!_· .
h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No X -.
i. Could it.expose people or structures to major geologic
hazards? Yes No ·X
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No X
If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail.
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report
may be required.
· 4. If t11erc is no significant impnct as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Dcclnration shall be prepared in accord:ince with Exhibit C as shown
in the "Guidelines Implementing t.hc California Environmental Quality Act of "1.,.)
1970 as Amended"
"AA-4" AGENDA ITEM #lQ(y). -DISTRICT 5" & 6 '' AA_;.4"
EXHIBIT "A-2"
0
S. If an EnvironmcntaJ.~~p3ct Report is required, explain below proceJures in
causing preparation of same • .
"AA-5"
. .
· .
..
. .
'
AGENDA ITEfv1 #lO(v) -DISTRICTS 5 P.!. 6
BXHIB IT "A-3"
2/28/78
Date
..
..
. •
"AP.-5"
•
t i-tM~:::-:1 Dl?f. 7 BOUNDt.RY
~ PRDPD.'iO ANN~~A~N;
0 ANNCYAllDN # "BB"
"CC"
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX t90 CALIF ORN IA 92648
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
April 11, 1978
Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Sbuject: Warner Avenue Relief Sewer -Phase II
Warner-Bolsa Chica-Los Patos
Dear Mr. Lewis:
As per our recent conversation we request that the County
Sanitation Districts prepare an agreement for the design and con-
struction of a joint sanitary sewer system project. The limits of
construction of the proposed project would be as follows:
(1) In Warner Avenue from 800 feet west of Graham Street to Balsa
Chica Street. :
(2) In Balsa Chica Street from Warner Avenue to Los Pates.
(3) In Los Patos Avenue from Bolsa Chica Street to Marina View Place.
The City will bear the design and construction cost for that
portion of the system located in Balsa Chica Street and in Warner
Avenue. The County Sanitation District No. 11 will be responsible
for the cost of design and construction of that portion of the system
located in Los Pates Avenue. The cost of the preparation of the EIR
for the Balsa Chica and Los Pates systems will be shared in the same
ratio as the respective lengths of sewer lines 'constructed in each of
the streets.
Concurrently with the preparation of the joint agreement by
District staff, we will begin preparation of the RFP for both the
design of the total project and for the preparation of the EIR.
There are indications of imminent problems in the existing Warner
Avenue sewerage system and for that reason we request an appropriate
priority be placed on the preparation of the agreement.
Very truly yours,
~d.~
Director of Public Work.s
HEH:MZ:jy ..... , .... .. ... AGENDA ITEM #10(EE) (1) -DI~T~lCF:.-.-11 "CC" .....
PEAT. MAnw1c1c :M1TcIIELL & Co.
Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester
CER'l'JlrIED PUDLlC ACCOUNTANTS
000 NEWPOHT CENTl~H DIUVE
NEWPORT BEACll, CALIFOHNIA 02000
May 2, 1978
Director of Finance and Board Secretary
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Dear Nr. Sylvester:
;-~::., . ,•
As requested by the Executive Committee of the Joint Boards o·f Directors of the
Districts at their meeting on April 26, 1.978, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
(PNM&Co.) is pleased to submit this proposal to assist the Districts in:
development of a comprehensive accounting systems design,
issuance of a Request for Proposal for computer hardware and software,
and
selection of a vendor (or vendors) to implement the Districts' proposed
data processing approach. ~
BACKGROUND
Last year the Districts contracted with P~~t&Co. to develop a Revenue Program to
assist the Districts in achieving compliance with the user charge/industrial cost
·recovery regulations establis:ied by EPA and the California State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB). One element of PHN&Co.'s work during the Revenue Program
development p~occss involved analysis of the District's data processing require-
ments to determine:
' the cost and operational impact of the Revenue Program on the Districts'
current data processing arrangement with Xerox Computing Services (XCS),
and
the Districts' long-range (five-year) data processing requirements.
The results of this analysis are presented in the accompanying document entitled
"Report on a Data Processing Approach Study for the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County."
Revenue Pror,ram Sta.tu~
PMM&Co. completed dev~lopment of a preliminary Revenue Program in October, 1977.
Du~ to impcnd.ing changes to Public Law 92-500 which were signed into law in
.Decl~mhcr, 1977, the Districts decided not to submit the Revenue Program document
"DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #13CA)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1"
.v.
1-:
P. M. M. S. CO.
Mr. J. \fay ~l\.~ Sy 1 vcs tc r
Director of Finance and Board Secretary
May 2, 1978
2
until after the legislation had passed and new regulations interpreting the legis-
lation were finalized by EPA and the SWRCB. Several drafts of the proposed
regulations have been issued since December, 1977.
The major changes incorporated in the legislation and the regulations that affect
the Districts' Revenue Program include:
•
•
authority to use the ad valorem tax as a billing mechanism for user
charges
industrial users are now defined as all non-governmental users dis-
charging more than 25,ooq gallons per day of equivalent domestic waste
Revenue Programs must be approved by the SWRCB and EPA by July 1, 1979 •
Data Processing Approach
The analysis contained in the accompanying report indicates that the Districts'
current data processing approach will not be cost-effective over the next five
years. Implenentation of the user charge and industrial cost recovery accounting
systems requi~ed by the Revenue Program will also add to the increasing costs of
XCS services. The Districts now have an-opportunity to implement a new data
processing approach that will:
meet the Districts' data processing requirements for at least the next
five years, and also
bring the Districts into compliance with PL .92-500 by implementing
automated user charge and industrial c~st recovery accounting systems
by July 1, 1979.
As presented in the Recommendations section of the accompanying report, the
· Districts' most cost-effective approach to achieving the o-bjectives outlined
above is to purchase an in-house minicomputer. A minicomputer will mee.t the
Districts' long-range projections for transaction and sborage requirements, and
will also allow for development of the software necessary to support the unique
requirements of the Districts' user charge and industrial cost recovery systems.
Systems design, vendor selections, equipment installation and systems implemen-
tation can be achieved by July 1, 1979 using this approach.
APPROACH AND SCOPE
PMN&Co. has assisted many clients in designing, selecting and installing computcr-
bascd financial and accounting systems. Our experience indicates that the most
successful installations are those in which we and our clients performed a
complete, thorough analysis of the client's sys tern req ui remcn ts prior to sc lee t ion
of computer hardware and software vendors. The Executive Committee supported
AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2"
P. M. M. B. CO.
Mr. ~•. W.1; ,, . ..? Sy 1 ves tcr
Dlrcct·or of Finance and Board Secretary
May 2, 1978
3
this approach when the Districts' staff and PN}l&Co. presented it at the meeting
on April 26, and accordingly we propose the following scope of work:
Development of a systems design for all the Districts' existing and
anticipated financial and accounting systems requirements -y.,... ..
Preparation and issuance of a ·Request for Proposal to local minicomputer
hardware and software vendors as well as to Municipal Data Systems (MDS)
and Public Agency Data Systems (PADS), two local public agency data
centers
Selection of a vendor (or vendors).
WORK PLAN
We will undertake the following work plan over the next two months to complete the
proposed scope of work:
"DD-3"
Task
1. Develop Districts' financial and
accvunting systems requirements
for July 1, 1979. Subtasks:
Flowchart existing systems
Develop conceptual design
of new system
Review design with Districts'
staff
Prepare in-principle design
2. Prepare detailed Orange County tax
roll interface specifications.
Subtasks:
Complete development of an
interface design for user
chargc/ICR billing and file
maintenance
Review design with Districts'
and Orange County staffs
Start
Date --
5/15/78
Presentlt-
underway
AGENDA ITEM #13CA)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS
Completion
Date
6/7/78
6/7/78
PMM&Co.
Hours
569
96
"DD-3"
. "'-1
e. M. M. a CO.
Mr. J. 'fo~:1h: Sylvester
Director of Finance and Board Secretary
?fay 2, 1978
4
Task
Start
Date
3. Determine final hardware configur-5/29/78
ation possibilities. Subtasks:
Review proposed data processing
approach in light of design
specifications developed in
Tasks 1 and 2
Develop a list of the potential
hardware configurations avail-
able to meet these specifica-
tions
4. Prepare and distribute RFP. Sub-
tasks:·
Prepare design specifications
in the form of a Request for
Proposal
Review RFP with Districts'
staff
Distribute RFP to selected
vendors
~leet with vendors as necessary
to fully explain RFP
5. Select vendor. Subtasks:
Receive vendor proposals
Evaluate proposals in terms
of specifications and
evaluation criteria
Select appropriate vendor
6/12/78
7/10/78
Completion
Date
6/9/78
6/23/78
7/21/78
Total PMM&Co. professional staff hours
'
TIME Aim FEES
PMM&Co.
Hours
28
127
188
1,008
We propose to complete this engagement by July 28, 1978. Our fees will be on a cost
reimbursement basis as presented on the EPA 5700-41 form in Appendix A to this pro-
posal. As .P~~l&Co. operates on a fiscal year basis,·our rates will change on July 1.
1978, and we have priced the hours we anticipated working in July at the higher rates.
We expect that our fees and expenses will not exceed $49,635.90.
* * * * * * *
~'DD-4;' AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) -ALL.DISTRICTS "DD-4"
P. M. M. s. CO.
Mr. J. tfaya.: Sylvester
Dir~ctor of Finance and Board Secretary
May 2, 1978
5
We are confident that the resources to be committed by the Districts and PHM&Co.
to this project will ensure tl1at the target date of July 28, 1978 for selection
of computer hardware and software or public agency data center vendors will be
met. We look forward to working closely with the Districts in completing this
challenging assignment.
Very truly yours,
PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO.
'-I . (/)(),/[/ . o.;~~ ...... k,~
Lawrence D. Provisor, Principal
LDP:lg
'
"DD-5" AGENDA ITEM #13CA)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS "DD-5"
v
~·-·
"DD-6"
APPENDIX A
EPA 5700-41 FOfili
AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS "JJD-6"
COST or~ PIHCE srnn.~Af!Y FOl~MAT FOH SlH\ACFH:Et.~t:NTS UNDER u.~ .• EPA GR/,HTS
(St•f• .·1c-C"or:;11: ,,,_,. i Ile.~ i "·"tr"'"" I ion.-.; lwfort: nm;[J 11 •: i ni~ t Iii~ iurr::)
form ..t l'f.'W\'t:d
0.1111 No. 1:;s:-uo1.J.1
·------~----------~---------------------------~~------------------------------..._--~--------------·--, PAWr I· GUH:f{Al.
1. C•ftANT~E:: 2. GnAuT NlJMHE'R
C-06-1073 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
103-.-,-,,-.,M-E-O-..--Cotn R O.C TOF: on. SU!JCONTn ACTOR 4.0ATEO~-p~.-~O~P~O~S~A-L--~------~----•
Peat, Man.lick .. Mitchell & Co.
5 0 AOORCSS OF C.OtnRt,CTOR OH SU~CONTRACTO>c (lnelu:lt: Zli' cock)
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Mnv 2 .. 1978
6. TVPF. OF S!:~VICE: T ()CH: t•unNl:iti~O
RFP preparation and
EDP vendor selection
PART II-COST SUMMARY
7. DIRECT LABOR (Specif>" l4tbot cat~tories)
(see Attachment 1)
ESil-
MATEO
HOUR~
s
HOURLY
RATE
s
ESTIMATED
COST
·-------------------------------------------------+--------1------------....... ----------------
TOTALS
.. : I
I .. . . . · I
: 1 -.. ·'·.. -... .-: .. s i~·.." 1u~··.63· "-I
r--~-------------------------------------------------?--·-----T--------------,~-------------+---~~;..::...::;..:;..~---·
DIRECT LI.DOR TOTAL:
1 _a_._•_N_o_1_R_E_c_T_c_o_s_T_s_<_~_~_c_1_1y_i_n_~_~c-c_t_c_o_st_p_o_o_1s_> ______________ ~R-A_T_E __ ~ __ x_e __ As_E_._= __ ~---E-S-~-~-~-~-T_E_o __ ~1' ·c • . : ,~;~~I
:====================================:=1-~11~~~s::1_a_,_11_~-~~~~s_'_b __ n_1Q-~~1-'-i . -~02:1 : r 2<0~s. 121 INDIRECT COSTS TOH.L: ... :-~·.-. ;: ·:-~: .. '. '· . . : ... . . . .. . . ... ~ ,. :· -
ESTIMATED
COST a. TRAVEL
s 2, 061. 80
s 300.00
.. . ,, !· . s 2-361. 80 .-.. .... ~.
COST ESTIMATED
COST
s 400.00
100.00
so.nn
--=--550.00
' ESTIMATED
COST c. SU9CONTRl',CTS
s I
---------·---------·-r----r-----s----! ~UBCONlRACTSSURTOT~L: ' ----------~------·-------------------------
~ , s
ESTIMATED
COST
·-----------·------------~-----------------------------.----------------~--------------·
OTH~f< SUfHOT/.L: i--1-S
-~---_-_-_-_-_-----------------~~-c-:-, -O-T._tf_E_P._P_l_R_t._C_T __ C_O_$··-T-~-2_-.?T I~ L: _ _j_==J=------~----------==: .. _':_·~==~----~. -. -·· ~--_3_,-~_!__l:..:.~ t
.~~L rsH-0.\'fF.O CO~T s 4~2..12?·· ?·':i. -~
1 \. PH:)F11· -·-----~---------------------------·...,....---·'""'i-· ~J_!~---! ~c.;-h_L_l_'f;t.:.( I> 49,635.90• ~
~ ~..,.......,.,...._._ ....... ~"....,,., .... ,·---.--...------·--,.---·--------...-~-.w.......--· ___________ _..._.............._ ......... ...:i
t f'/\ F cum .S~!)\) •• 11 (1°76) Pl\Gt: 1 or f.
"DD-7" AGErmA ITEM #13(A) (3) ALL DISTRICTS "DD-7"
. ifri ;;· ~-;, • I 't.•: • l•'n I ·I I -PART Ill ·PRICE SUMMAHY
'l. COMPf.TITOH'S CATALOG Ll:iTHICS, IN•HOU!oC ESTlf.tATCS, PltlOR QUOTES MAF«KET PF•OPO~tO
(lnd1cut~ basu lor pr,.;c comp11'illt1nJ PRIC'l:.CS> PRICC
.
.. . . . .
' . . \
.. .. .. . .. s . . .. . .. · .. ·.•
PART IV-CERTIFICATIONS
14. CONTRACTOR
14a. HAS A FEDERAL A:OENCY OR A FEOE~A!..LV CE.FtTlf'IEO STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY PEP.FORMED ANY ~EVtEW OF YOUR
ACCOUNTS OR RECORDS IN CONNECTION VltTH AUY OTHER FECEP.AL GRANT OR CONTRACT WITHIN THE PAST TWEL.VE MONTHS?
RQl YES 0 NO (II "Yes•• tive no:nf' addr~s& and telephone number of tevie"•i:111 otlico)
United States Defense Contract Audit Agency
1340 West Sixth Street
Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 688-3518
t4b. THIS SUMMARY CONFORMS wnH THE FOLLOWmG COST PRINCIPLES
40CFR30.710; 41CFR1-15.2
I~
1'4c. Assistance requested by
This pro?osa! i$ submitted for use in connection with and in response to (1) County Sanitttt-~istricts
in prepara~ion of an RFP and selection of a . . . • . =ituye f .. --..: ..,. r · • 1 his is to certI f y to the best o{ rny know I:-~ gc
an c ic tfi.tCt7•~ c·ost and pric.:ing data summarized hP.rein arc complete, currE:'nt, c:nd accurate as of .
(2) .. May 1, 1978 and that a financial management capability exists to fuHy and ~ccu-
ralcly accotu:t for the financi<!l transactions under this project. l imther cc·rtify that I understand that the
subagrec-nw~t ?dee may be subject to downward rcner.otiation and/ or reccupr.~ent where the above cc•st and
pricing dato lin,·,:, been d<'lermined, as a result of audit, n2een com pie!!: ·erent and accurnte as
of the datr. aho"·e. . . . ·Q . .
(3) May 1, 1978 . ~ --R{, 2 -----.
OAT£ OF EXECUTIO~.i --" _SIGNATUF~ OF F"RO?OSEP.
.
Principal
' TITL.C OF PROPOSER
'4. GPAtfTEE REVIEWER I --
I certify that I ha\•e reviewed the cost/price sumr::ary set forth herein and the proposed costs/price appear
acccptnb!c for ~ubng&ccmc-nt O\\'ard.
[)ATF. OF CXECUTION SIGl':A \URE OF RE VIEV;F.R
-TITLE OF n&Vl~\•.ER ..
1t. l'r'A REVl[\\£H (II ''!'l'licollh.-)
.•
. ...... --t>A Tt. Of.' f.).CCUTIOt.I &IGNAl'uru: OF RCVICV'iEft
TITL.l (.lF nF:v1r:\•1tU -.. -----· .. -..... ,~
EPA r orm S700·41 <1·76) f'AGE 2 OF 5
"DD-8" AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS nnD-8"
I\ L L d L (I m1.· n I. l
7. Direct Labor
Estimated Hourly Estimated Tot:1l
Hours Rate Cost Estim.:itcd
Category 77-78 78-79 77-78 78-79 77-78 78-79 Cost V
Partner 40 17 $ 33.64 33.64 1,345.60 571. 88 1, 917. 48
Project Manager 309 84 17.44 18.60 5,388.96 1,562.40 6, 951. 36
UC/ICR Consultant 17 15.60 265.20 265.20
EDP Consultant 228 122 15 .60 17.44 3,556.80 2,127.68 5,684.48
Systems Consultant 40 15.60 624.00 624.00
Accounting Consultant 120 14.46 -1,735.20 1,735.20
Technical Consultants 31 20.61 638.91 638.91
Typists 40 10 6.90 6.00 240.00 60.00 300.00
Direct labor total $ 18,116.63
"DD-9" AGENDA ITEM #13(A)(3) -·ALL DISTRICTS "DD-9"
"DD-10"
Attachmcn t 2
9. Other Direct Costs
A. Travel
Washington, D.C. -Los Angeles
1 round trip at $392-Y air fare $ 392.00
Cleveland -Los Angeles
1 round trip at $354-Y air fare 354.00
Los Angeles -Fountain Valley
86 round trips at $15.30 1,315.80
($.17 per mile)
Subtotal travel $ 2,061.80
B. Per Diem: 4 days
Hotel at $30.00
Meals and incidentals at $20.00
Rental car at $25.00
·Subtotal per diem
Subtotal travel and per diem
C. Equipment, Materials, Supplies
Reproduction costs for flowcharts,
procedures, etc.
Telephone
Miscellaneous
Subtotal equipment, etc.
Total
120.00
80.00
100.00
400.00
10.0.00
50.00
AGENDA ITEM #13CA)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS
300.00
2, 361. 80
550.00
$ 2, 911. 80
"DD-10"
'l'l..\v : P j
05-03-78
RESOLUTION NO. 78-100
ADOPTING REVISED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF OR~NGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISED
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE AND REPEALING
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE ADOPTED BY
RESOLUTION NO. 76-213 ON DECEMBER 8, 1976
* * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That the Code entitled "Conflict of Interest
Code of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County",
dated May 15, 1978, a copy of which is attached hereto and
by reference incorporated herein, be and is hereby, approved
and adopted for the Districts, subject to the approval
thereof by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange;
and,
Section 2: That the Secretary of the Districts be, and
is hereby authorized and instructed, to submit a copy of
such Code to the Board of Supervisors of the ·county of Orange,
and to request said Board of Supervisors to approve said
Code in accordance with Government Code Section 87303; and,
"EE-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "EE-1"
u
\,,,,,/
"EE-2"
Section 3: Resolution No. 76-213, dated December 8,
1976, adopting a revised Conflict of Interest Code of the
County Sanitation Distric±s of Orange County, California,
is hereby repealed effective ten (10) days after approval
of the revised Code adopted herein and approved by the
Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May
10, 1978.
-2-
AGENDA ITEM #13Cc) ALL DISTRICTS "EF-2"
May 3, 1978
S T A F F REPORT
CouNrv SANrrA110N D1s1mc1~s
of 0HANG[ COUNlY, CALIJ"OHNIA
108.C.C [LLIS AVl.NUC
FOUNTAIN VALLCV. CALIFORNIA 9:?71 t
(714) ~ •• iQ.]910 ~
(71 .. ) 962-7411
Proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills
This matter was deferred from the April 12th Joint Meeting
because of concern by the Board that the proposed annexation may
involve the Cities of Anaheim and Orange. Attached is a map indi-
cating the ridge line in the Anaheim Hills area. We have determined
that the proposed annexation is to the ~orth of the ridge line and
is entirely within the City of Anaheim's zone of influence.
It is, therefore, the staff's reconunendation that the Board
declare its intent to approve deferment of annexation acreage fees
on the 53 acres proposed to be dedicated to the County of Orange as
permanent open space and declare its intent to approve an agreement
to pay annexation fees on the balance of the property in equal annual
installments over a 4-year period. One-fourth before initiation of
proceedings and the balance in three equal annual installments with V
interest at 8% on the unpaid balance.
(Anaheim Hills, Inc., proposes the annexation of 241 acres and
has requested deferral of payment for. 53 acres of permanent open
space that will be dedicated to the County of Orange. In addition,
they wish to spread the payment of current annexation acreage fees,
$254,472.09, on the balance of approximately 188 acres over a 4-year
period.)
"GG-1" AGENDA ITE~ f30CA) -DISTRICT 2 "GG-1"
.. -. r ·-1·· . --·_. ...
.ANAHEIM HILLS
PROPOSED
ANNEXATION
NO.
ORANGE
. ',... .. -.. . ", , I L ( \}I J •\J ._' l
... .. •. ·. ; -:'.
..,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.
ANAHEIM HILLS
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 28
AREA = 245.905 ACRES "GG-2"
MAY 10,, 1978
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 p,M,,,
. .. . . . . . . . . .
WEDNESDAY, MAY ~. INVITE ~ OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND
AND PARTICIPATE IN
WE HAVE BEEN PREPARING FOR A DEDICATION CEREMONY FOR THE
SECONDARY TREATMENT FACILITIES AT PLANT NO, 1,, WHICH WAS TENTATIVELY
SCHEDULED FOR MAY 4TH. IN CONJUNCTION WITH A VISIT BY PRESIDENT CARTER
I..._! TO CALIFORNIA,, THE WHITE HOUSE STAFF AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY WERE CONSIDERING HIS APPEARANCE AT THE DEDICATION, DUE TO
OTHER COMMITMENTS,, HOWEVER,, THE PRESIDENT COULD NOT ATTEND THE
DEDICATION.
THE CEREMONIES HAVE NOW BEEN PUT OFF UNTIL JUNE,, WHEN WE EXPECT
A VISIT FROM THE EPA ADMINISTRATOR DOUGLAS COSTLE.
DATE IS ESTABLISHED,, WE WILL NOTIFY THE DIRECTORS,
AS SOON AS A
' I ' l pJ '
I I ff
1 ,,
MEETING DATE
DISTRICT 1
May 10, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
/It(~) JOINT BOARDS
. ~WELSH~········SHARP ••••••• __L_ _!___ ----
RILEY ········ANTHONY····._..;_ --' ---
ORTIZ ••••••• ·EVANS.·····._.;_ -1L -
BRIGGS) •••••• ·RIMA········-.; -_.:f__ --
DISTRICT 2
FRIEp) •••••••• wEDAA ••••••• _v_·_ ~ ----
HOYT) ••••••••• SMITH· • • • • • • -"---_
RILEY) ••••••• -~ ••••• ·-"-_.i_ --
COOPER) ••••••• FOX.····.· •• _J_ -"---
ROG ET) •••••••• GRAHAM • • •••• _J ---' ---
DE JESUS) ••••• HOLT··.····._.;_ --" ---
WELLS) ••••• •• .HOUSTON··•· ._J_, --4 --
EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ ••• • • • • " _:__t!_ --
CULVER) ••• ••• -PERRY (::!,;A:·· .--r _r/ ---
WBtlJl9J ••••••••• ROTH· ::1:f ... 0 re. ·~ _J _ --
ADLER) •••••••• STANTON •••• ·-"-· -Tl __
WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ •• ·-"-___ _
DISTRICT 3
ADLER •••••••• SVALSTAD •• • ._j_ _v __ _
LACAYO) ••••••• HUDSON •••••• _.J __ .J __ _
PERRY) •••••••• CULVER··.·· ._J __ , __ _
COOPER) ••••••• GAMBINA • • • • ._..; ___ , __ _
BLACKMAN) ••••• GRAY •••••••• _J_ --"· __ _
'MEYER)······· ·GRIFFIN···· ._J __ i1_· __ _
WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER •••••• _v_ -"-' __ _
FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON •••• • • • J ~
EVANS) ••••• •• .ORTIZ.·· t1·i.·\·-"-. ~ ==
NYBORG) ••••••• PR I EST •• J-~ .----r;;-J J =N ) •••••••• ROGET~ •••••• -v--.;---
."'Y. ~ ------••••••••• RM-H ... ~Ni~ • • • £'-' .;
RILEY) •••••••• SCHM~T·•···· ~ J. ==
BROWN) ......... SYLVIA ••• ••• v· J
S·HENKMAN •••••• SIEBERT ••••• -v-~ --
VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS..... ..; _ .. _ ==
DISTRICT 5
tJUMMEL • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ._J __ v_· __ _
ANTHONY)····· •RILEY·•····._/, --+---
RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·STRAUSS· • • • ·-" __ v_ --
DISTRICT 6
' " ~BRIGGS) ••••••• RIMA ........... -..i_ -r---
RYCKOFF) • • • • • ·i1e--I-NN-l-S· • • ._J_ ·--r---
RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• -..:J._ ----
DISTRICT 7
GAIDO •.• ••••• ·VARDOUL.IS·. -.:L '4 --
RILEY)······· ·"Ci:AR:K.-• • • • ._J_ --·---
ORTIZ).········ EVANS.····· ._J_ ~ --
HUTCHISON).·· ·GL9Gl<flltlh • • ._; __ ./_· --
WELStf) • ·······SALTARELLI· ._J_ .-L+ --
(HOYT) • • • • • • • • ·SM I TH· • • • • • ·--./ --··-t.i --
(RYC KOFF)····· ·WILLIAMS··· ._:f_ _J_ --..
DISTRICT 11
SHENKMAN •• ·.·PATTINSON·· ._v _ _j_ __
BA I LEY)· • • • • • ·SHENKMAN· • • • ..J I __
RILEY}······· ·SCHMIT······ J -r-__
RILEY~·········ANTHONY···~ v ---·
RI LEY • • • • • • • • ·CLARiC • • • • • • •
PERRY ·········CULVER·····
ORTIZ ·········EVANS······~
COOPER)········FOX········ J
COOPER)········GAMBINA···· J HUTCHISON)····~R··· '
ROGET) • • • • • • • • ~GRAHAM· • • • • J
BLACKMAN)······GRAY······· '
MEYER)·········GRIFFIN····
RASHFORD) • • • • • ·HOLT·· • • • ~ • \ --
WELLS) • • • • • • • • ·HOUSTON· • • ·+ --
LACAYO) • • • • • • • ·HUDSON • • • • ·-'---RYC KOFF)·····• ·MC INNIS··._/ __ _
WEISHAUPT)···· ·MILLER•··· .l_ __
FINLAYSON)···· ·OLSON······~ __
EVANS)········ ·ORTIZ····· ·t-__ .
SHENKMAN)······PATTINSON·· __
CULVER)········PERRY······ __
NYBORG) ········PRIEST·····--__
ANTHONY) • • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • l__ __
BRIGGS)····•·· ·RIMA·••···._\ __ _
YOUNG) • • • • • • • • ·ROGET· • • • • ._) __ _
SEYMOUR) •••••• ·R&ftt: ••••• ·F --
(WELSH • • ·······SALTARELLI· __
HUMMEl) • • • • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • __
(RILEY •• ·······SCHMIT···· ·F --
<WELSH • • ·······SHARP· • • • • • __
SBAILEY) ••••••• ·SHENKMAN·.-~ --
\SHENKMAN)······ SI EBERT··· ·_l_ __
lHOYT)··········SMITH······_j__
(ADLER)·········STANTON····-.!-==
(RYCKOfF) • • • ····STRAUSS· • • ._1 __ _
ADLER) ••••••••• svALSTAD··· \
ZOMMICK) ••••••• SYLVIA····· ) ==
GAIDQ) ••••••••• VARDOULIS·· (
WINTERS) ••• ••• ·VELASQUEZ··-\---
FRIED) •• •••••• -WEDAA· • • • • ·-/---
R¥CKOFF) ·······WILLIAMS·· .-,1
---
°(VELASQUEZ)···· ·WINTERS····-=::.
OTHERS
~U khc-frc ~j(',,,Jic, ~JJ 1.1-0«. ('
Kc.___ H{lrt,~'' C-
1:hl,'-' \lv f 1
/JJ o.,,~·-· <_fxJ~
r r'-f' r' ~c,.., ~(,c-./
eel Ju~+-.
HARPER ••••• _v_·
··SYLVESTER •• ~
LEWIS ••••• ·+
CLARKE •••• ·~
BROWN ••••• ·--
WOODRUFF ••• ~
HOHENER ••• ·--
HOWARD •••• ·--
HUNT ••••••• _.L
KEITH •••••• __
KENNEY ••••• __
LYNCH •••••• __
MADDOX ••••• _
MARTINSON •• __
PIERSALL ••• __
STEVENS •••• __
.. TRAVERS •••• _
"-" DISTRICT 8
(LAWRENCE) • • • • ·EDWARDS· • • • ·------
BRAND· • • • • • ·--___ _
(CLARK)••••·•· ·RILEY·······------
5/10/78
... \._)
MEETING JJATE _;..;,;Ma~v~lO;;.,l;i.....;:.;19~7..;;;8~-llME 7:30 p.m. UISTRICTS l,L,5,!>,(),7 & 11
DISTRICT 1 """' (o(h)
-1WELSH) •••••••• SHARP ••••••• V""' ~ ----
RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY·····~ ~ ~ ORTIZ)~~ ••• -~·EVANS ••••••• ...iL._ ~ -
BRl88S) -~~~.-RIMA ••• ····-~ -1---
DISTRICT 2 .
FR I Et» • • • • • ·• • • WEDAA • • • • • • .L_ ~ -HOYT) ••••••••• SMITH· •• •••• V __ _
RI LEY) •••••••• ~LO.R K-•• • • • • • ..JL.... ~ --
COO PE~) ••••••• Fox •••••••• -~~ --
ROGET) ••••••• -GRAHAM·····-~ ..if----
DE JESUS) ••• • -HOLT·······-~ ...::f..---
WELLS) •••••• ·.HOUSTON····-~ _::/...._. --
EVANS) •••• ••• -ORTIZ.····· • ..w:=::,_ ~ --
CULVER) •••• •tt. PERRY· • • • • • ·....a.L-.::J__ --~ )~~.1/'l~~ •• -Reflt ••••••• -~ ~ --
ADLER) •••••••• STANTON ••••• _.L_ ~ __
WINTERS) •••••• VELASQUEZ •• -~ f--__
DISTRICT 3
ADLER ••••••• -SVALSTAD ••• -~ -:i.-__
LACAYO) ••••••• HUDSON •••••• _L_ ..L_ __
PERRY) •••••••• CULVER······~ .::t-__
COOPER) ••••••• GAMBINA • • • • -~ _:::J__ __
BLACKMAN) ••••• GRAY ••••••• ·~ .:J__ __
"MEYER)··· • • ···GR I FF IN···· ·~ ;t._ __
WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER.· •• ··~~ __
FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON •••••• ·~~ __
EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ·······~
NYBORG) ••••••• PR I EST ••• -• ·~ --
YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET ••••• ··~ --
"Pt18M) ~~:f ~.Qq.~.R@iliH ••••• ·~. ·~ .L ==
RILEY) •••••••• SCHMIT • .; ••• ·~ _::/___ __
BROWN) •••••••• SYLVIA ••••• ·~~ __
SHENKMAN., •••• SIEBERT ••••• ~
VELASQUEZJ •••• WINTERs ••••• ~ ==
DISTRICT 5
liUMMEL ••••••• RYCKO~F ••••• _L_ i --
ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY········~ _y-_ --
RYCKOFF) ······STRAUSS····-~ .:f__ --
BRI886 J\~~ .RIMA ............. ~ ::J__ --
RYCKOFF) • • • • • MC HUH.&··· ·.J:::::.._ .::J__ --
RILEY) •••••••• ANTHONY····~ ~ -.·-
• ,: ~ • I
DISTRICT 7 '. . ... . -.../
GAIDO •.• • • ·• • • ·VARDOULIS· • -__b,l_ --.
RILEY) •• ••••• .-€LARK.······ v' ~ --
ORT I z) • • • • • • • ·EVANS· • • • • • -~ ~ -· -
HUTCH I SON)· • • .. GlOCJ<HER• • • -~ --
WELStl) • • • • • • • • SAL TAR ELLI • ·~ --
HOYT) • • • ·• • • • • • SM ITH. • • • • • .. V __1:! --
RYCKO.FF) ••••• ·WILLIAMS···-~~ --
DISTRICT 11
SHENKMAN ••• •• PATTINSON··· v _J,}_ -· _
. BAI LEY)· • • • • • ·SHENKMAN· • • .-1::::::,_ .:J.__:_ __
RILEY).···.··· ·SCHMIT······ V j__ __
·····EDWARDS·····
B
·~-----· I LEY· • • • • • ._ ___ _
5/10/78
PERRY ·········CULVER·····~ ----
ORTIZ ·········EVANS······~ ----
CO.OPER) •·······FOX·······.---&..::::::::: --
COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • -~ --
HUTCH I SON)•··· ·GLOCICNER • ·~ -
ROGET) • • • • • • • • ·GRAHAM· • • • -~ --·.
BLACKMAN)····· ·GRAY•······~ --
MEYER)······•· ·GRIFFIN···· .............. --
RASHFORD) ······HOLT·••••~·~ --
WELLS) • • • • • • • • ·HOUSTON·· • ·--JL. --
LACAYO)······· ·HUDSON·····~ --
R¥e1<ttf"F7 • • • • • • MC Ir• N I S-· • ·--=--__
WEISHAUPT)···· ·MILLER·····~·-
FINLAYSON)···· ·OLSON······~ __
EVANS)········ ·ORTIZ······~ __ . SHENKMAN)······PATTINSON··~ ____
CULVER) • • • • • • • ·PERRY· • • • • • ~ __
NYBORG) ········PRIEST·····~ __
ANTHONY).· • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • ~ __
BIU 888 ~~f)\\)('. • ·RI MA· • • • • • • ~ ·--
YOUNG) • • • • • • • • ·ROGET· • • • • • ~ __
SEYMOUR)······ ·.Aai+I· • • • • • ·~ --HUMME~) • • • • • • • ·RYCKOFF • • • ·~
(WELSH)········ ·SALTARELLI·~ --
(RILEY)········ ·SCHMIT····· '-""""'"--
WELSH)•···•··· ·SHARP······~ --
BAI LEY)······· ·SHENKMAN···~ --
SHENl<MAN) • • • ···SI EBERT·· • ·~ --
HOYT).•.········· ·SMITH·.·.····~==
ADLER)·· • • • • • • ·STANTON· • • ·...JL.. __
RYCKOfF) ·······STRAUSS··· •__JL_ __
ADLER) ••••••••• svALSTAD···~
ZOMMICK) ••••••• sYLVIA·····~ ==
GAIDO) ••••••••• VARDOULIS··~ ·
WINTERS) ••••••• VELASQUEZ··~ ====
FR I ED) • • • • • • • • ·WEDAA • • • • • ·--lL. ·
R¥CKOFF) ······-WILLIAMS··· ,__....... --
(VELASQUEz) ••••• WINTERS····. re==::::::_
OTHERS
HARPER •••• ·--
·SYLVESTER.·-
LEWIS ••••• ·--
CLARKE •••• ·--
BROWN ••••• ·--
WOODRUFF ••• __ .
HOHENER ••• ·--
HOWARD ••••• __
HUNT ........ __
. KEITH •••••• __
KENNEY ••••• __
LYNCH •••••• __
MADDOX ••••• _
MARTINSON •• __
PIERSALL. •• __
STEVENS •••• __
.TRAVERS •••• _
DRAFT
--4 /-2 6 / 7 e,s I ) ~
Post Office Box 8127
· t"Q ARDS O F DIRECTORS
Co u nty Sanitati on D istricts
I o f O ra nge County, Cal ifornia
I
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fo untain V olley, Calif., 92708
Te lephones:
II
JOI NT BO ARD S Are a Code 7 1 4
540-29 10
962-24 1 1
AG EN DA
ME ETING DATE
MAY lOJ 1978 -7 :30 p IM .
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEP ARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITION) STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY 'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM,
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Recognition of special guests
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda
(5) EACH DISTRICT
(6)
(7)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 April 12, 1978 regular
District 2 April 12, 1978 regular
District 3 April 12, 1978 regular
District 5 April 12, 1978 regular
District 6 April 12, 1978 regular
District 7 April 12, 1978 regular
District 11 April 12, 1978 regular
EACH DISTRICT
Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern of the Boards
(a) District 1
(b) District 2
(c) District 3
(d) District 5 ..
(e) District 6
(f) District 7
(g) District 11
Appointment of Chairmen pro tern , if necessary
/
(8)
•
(9)
(10)
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Man a ger
(c) General Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying p a ym e nt of cl a ims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shnll
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represent e d, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page (s)
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page (s) and
DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s)
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) and
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page (s)
DISTRICT NO. s NONE
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) and
DISTRICT NO. 11 See page (s)
ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS, 10( ) THROUGH 10( )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are c onsidered
as not requiring discussion or f urther e x pl a na t ion a nd
unles s any p a rticular item is requested to be remov e d f rom
the consent calendar by a Director, staff me mb er , or mem ber
of the public in a ttenda nce, there will be no separa te
discussion of th e se items. All items on the cons e nt calendar
will be enacted b y one action appr oving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions includ e d on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the cons e nt c a lendar
shall be consid e red in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent c a lendar s h all, upon re c ognition by the ch a ir, state
their name, a ddress and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent c a l e ndar .
..
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent cal e ndar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items a ppenring
on the consent cal e nd a r not specifically removed from same.
-2-
•
( )
(0
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
/ cw
)b>.
50
*{
;<el
~
~)
<; )
Rece i ve, file and deny claim of Stephen E. Thorne in the amount of
$5 ,131 .00 in connection with sewage backup, and refer to the Districts'
liability insurance carrier for appropriate action
Receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Abco Hardware & Builders
Supply, Inc. in the amount of $878.30 against C. H. Leavel l & Company,
contractor for Job No. P2 -23-3
Approving Resolution ~~1i oamending Reso lution No . ~8-36, approving plans
and specifications for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2,
aut horfzing a change in the bid date ·from April 27, 1978, to June 1, 1978.
Rece~ve and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase
of One (1) 3/4 Ton Cab & Chassis, Specification No. A-089 (Rebid), to
Sant a Ana Dodge, Inc., in the amount of $5,618 .00
Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase
of Three (3) One-Ton Cab & Chassis, Specification No. A-091, to
Theodore Robins Ford, in the. amount of $17,276.94
Ad opt revised CEQA Guidelines ~~-V~~
slope
s
r
Beds
Approve Resolution granting/easement to City of Huntington Beach for
encroachment on 30-foot utility corridor Get•·•eeR two plaftt~ for widening
and improvements of Hamilton Street Bridge Crossing'\\U-Q ~
t..oo~. ~
Approving Change Order. No. ~to Job No. P2-23-l, Flood Wall and Site
Development for 75 MGD Improved Treit~~1:1~1 ,at Plant No. 2, authorizing
adjustment of engineer's quantitie~, 5, e--o j-z, ~:Y' I 7 ,
Approving Change Order No. _i_ to Job No. P2-23-l, for landscaping
modifications for a deduction of ~*, 000 (.aa6-puss1ble time extension)
.11;1 gc 1>t/,s4/. 71
Approving Change Order No. ~'2_ to Job No. P2-23-l for miscellaneous ,t JI, 51t,,J D
paving improveme nts, pipe supports, etc. for an addition of~~
~and time extension of (0..5 days
Reso l ution accepting Job No . P2-23-l as complete and approving Final
Cl oseout Agreement
-3-
(CONTIN ED ON NEXT PAGE)
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
/
? Approve plans and specifications for Job
Sludge Hopper Outlet Port at Reclamation
advertising for bids to be received June
c(J• ~~
( )
~ E-093, Acgui~tion
No. PW-066, Modification of Existing
Plant No. 1, and authorizing
1, 1978
and LA/OMA
L W' Auth ~ze adve~ising fo~!Pus gravity filte"Ts iJ.nstal!e.Q. on t ~ JPL-ACfs
/ \ 1-MGD Facility/ $~OJ_\ , )+ -~ Y~ " f ,
: : (~ v1 <-( W-fi) /tr. --v-Y~ 1 ___ "
( )
( )
( ) CONSENT CALENDAR
DISTRICT 2 yq
,f\A (r0 Motion authorizing extension of f1n~J date i'or conunents on
~'\,/' \ Draft EIR on Carbon Canrz.~A ~acilitie S'-.P.lan (in order to~:~
Notice of Intent) ??? {)w1-.t ~\ -Q~ -'\--~
Receive and file request-from Anaheim Hills,~annexation of
. .755 acres of territory in the Anaheim Hills area, and refer to
f:'f-\ staff for study and reconunendation (Annexation No. 32 -Anaheim Hills
Annexation_ No . 8 to CSD No. 2) (~ ... ~'\)fk>-o ~ ~ .~l ' f>O~d--"Jr:ff. . f R. hf. ld Sb T k
)
~solut1on _approvrng p ans a·naspeci 1cat1ons or ic ie u -run ,
<q Contract No. 2-19, and authorize advertising for bids to be received
. on June l -3.. 1978 ch ~<LR ~ C ~ ~ ..... ,~ ~~~ 7\._e_a-d--0 . {~) Resolution -ap~oving plans and specifications for Kellogg Sub-Trunk,
f ontract No. 2-20, and authorize advertising for bids to be received
on June 13, 1978 ch ..Z. l e.~
'
Resolution accepting Grant of _Easement from City of Placentia in
connection with Richfield Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2 -19
'Resolutiei'fla.ccepting Grant_ of Easement-from §anta Fe Land Improvement ":\ Cbmpan ~in conn ~tion with Kellogg Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 2-20~~)
~)~ ~IJ ·.
uthorize Selecti n Committee to negotiate
\
~ f r preparat · of pla and ·specific · ~..-o-r--...
'1(>v 01 runk at Katella rossing the
. (~ Receive and fil e a~d authorizing~iation..of annexation proceedings
~ J re request from John and Agnes Carusillo for annexation of 1/2 acre
l-to the Distric t in the vicinity of South Mohler,~ ~;ll.31 _
in the City of Anaheim ~JOT HA:V£ QOGUME N:I'S ~//{EL ~
'ff.,~~~~ w I flr<-"i> 1-C\J2 d -1 '1 ,__~ -..l-<l
~ ( )
( )
( )
-5-
( )
...,,,,,,.
-
CONSENT CALENDAR
DISTE.ICT 3
(~ Approve Resolution making a negative declaration re Westside Relief
Force Ma in, Se c ond Unit, Contract No . 3-13-1, and providing f or notice
thereof
G_jy Approve
Portion
Ch a nge Order No . 3 to
of Reach 7, fo;?t'i e ld
Contract No . 3 -20-3, Knott Interceptor ,
clo s ure for addition of $7,983.00 ·
~~· s-~
·(y Re ce ive and-file Report on Contracts Nos. 3-20-3 and 3-22 -(
Rt:::\-~ -
() / ......___ __
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( >.
( )
( )
-6-
-r
( )
•
CONSENT CALENDAR
DISTRICT 5 & 6
/
c{)' Resolution making n egat ive declaration re Santa Ana River Siphon ~ 1· and providing for notice thereof
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )"
-7-
, .....
•.
( ) CONSENT CALENDAR
7
a uthori z ing initiation of annexation
Annexation No. 77 -Tract No. 5382, 43.21 acres
sou thwest e rly of th e terminus of Encanto Stree t
of Cerritos Drive , in the City of Orange
procee dings re
in the vicinity
and near the intersection
Resolution a uthori zi n g initiation of proc eedi n gs re Annexation No. 78 -
Tract No. 9688, 9.010 acres in the vicinity of Lemon He i ghts~Drive
. between Vist a del La go and La Cu esta (Must be annexed to 101-Sewer
, Maintenance Distri c t a7 so.) NEED REL RECOMMENDATION ??
'}q L'J O~~f'i'-D) ~
~,.~~~~
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
_ORDER Annex a tio~ .09 & 10 if LAFC Resolutions received. \Vere listed
on agenda of LAFC public hearing on April 12, 1978. Should be receiving
resolutions soon .
-9-
( ) CONSENT CALENDAR
DISTRYCT l ·l
~~ J:: c-rt7) )-~~,~ .
esolution approvin'g Reimbursemen!-A_Gi:e~ with City of Huntington
/ each to construct portion 0£.Mas.-ter -P-lan ~~ewers -UJ~ ~
C l ~ ~ =-· <(BL -t.,e,<=<d :,J
•
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
-10-
( !~LL DISTRICT S r Consideration
·-·
of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
( l ALL DI STRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of
motion to r ec eive and file the Committee's written report
ALL _ DISTRI CTS
Considerat ion of action on items recommended by the
Ex cutive Committee:
a) (1) Receive, file and approve Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. ~ Report
and recommendation } 11-111.
J 't.-;) I d .
Receive, file and accept proposal of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (2)
for detailed design of EDP System and services re vendor selection
'
Au t»...orize staff to prepare plans· and specifications and receive bids
forU1:nterim Solids Handl ~~ Facilities at Pl~nt No. 1, ~~ --~~~ ~-~~~ok6'~~.\J
/
Approve Resolution amending Conflict of Interest Code re reporting
procedures
( ) Re ceive , file and approve Fiscal Policy Committee report and recommendation
re self insurance for liability and workers' compensation ~. J "-(,, .. tf
~ p I
'\' . / G. . .
.......
( )
( )
-3(a)-
•
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
( ) ALL DISTRICTS
ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
-3(b)-
. .
. r
-
•
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
( ) DI STRICT 1
( ) DISTRICT 1
( ) DI STRICT 1
( ) . DISTR I CT 1
( ) DI STRICT 1
( ) DISTRICT 1
( ) DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemen~al agenda
i t ems , if any
) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-4(a )-
-
(
( )
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7:
Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve deferment of
a eage fees on approximately 53 acres, subject to execution of
greement betwe en Anaheim Hills, Inc ., City of Anaheim, County of Orange
and the District. (Deferred from 4/12/7 8 mtg.) -'"TI.--(...A....J ~~
Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve agreement between
Anaheim Hills, Inc. and District for p ayme nt of fees on approximately 188
acres in equal installments over a 4-year period. (Deferred from 4 /12 mtg.)
DISTRICT 2 ILW ~r
( ) DISTRICT 2
( ) DISTRICT 2
( ) DISTRICT 2
( ) DISTRICT 2
. /ISTRICT 2 ~ QOther business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-5(a)-
NON-CON SENT CALENDAR
( ) DISTRICT 3
( ) DISTRICT 3
( ) DISTRICT 3
( ) DIS TRI CT 3
( ) DISTRICT 3
( ) DIST RICT 3
( ) DIS TRI CT 3
( ) DIST RICT 3
Other busine ss a nd communications or supplementa l age nda
1 t ems , if any
( ) DISTRICT 3
Con sideration of motion to adjo u rn
-6(a)-
. ·-·--,. ------
;:.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
DISTRICT 5
__A/ ; ( J--n -
\y .J ~ {;,--
/-
DISTRICT 5 V /'I t' -(..../· '--
( ) DISTRICT 5
( ) DISTRICT 5
( ) DISTRICT 5
( ) DISTRICT 5
( ) DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( DISTRICT 5
·consideration of motion to adjourn
-7(a)-
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
( ) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( ) DISTRICT 6
Con sideration of motion to adjourn
-8(a)-
NO N-CO NSEN T CA LENDA R
( ) DIST RI CT 7
( )· DIST RI CT 7
( ) DI S TRICT 7
( ) DIS TRI CT 7
( ) DI STR I CT 7
( ) DISTR I CT 7
( ) DI STR I CT 7
( ) DISTRICT 7
Oth e r business and communicat i ons or supplemental agenda
item s, if any
( ) DI STR I CT 7
Consideration of motion to adj ourn
-9(a )-
,. .
•
...
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
( ) DISTRICT 11
Other business and comniunications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( ) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-lO(a)-
-~-------· r:
~ Agenda Item No. 6 -Annual Election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem
· District No.
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
James Sharp
City of Tustin
Henry Wedaa
City of Yorba Linda
Bernie Svalstad
City of Fountain Valley
Don Mclnnis
City of Newport Beach
Kerm Rima
Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist.
Pete Barrett
City of Newport Beach
Ron Pattinson
City of Huntington Bch.
· Vice ·chairman
Philip Anthony
Board of Supervisors
Don E. Smith
City of Orange
Donald Hudson
City of Cypress
Thomas F. Riley
Board of Supervisors
Paul Ryckof f
City of Newport Beach
Bill Vardoulis
City of Irvine
Ron Shenkman
City of Huntington Bch.
An up-to-date list of Directors by District is included in the
Directors' folders.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratify eme rgency action fo r necessary aspha l t repa irs and preparations
for open house for Pl-16 . Paving $7 ,000 to $8 ,000
Au thorize staf f to prepare p l ans and specifications and advertise for:
a. Sludge composting are a
b. Under dra in system for digester cleaning beds
Grant to City of Huntington Beach slope easement for encroachmen t on
3 0' utility corridor between t wo plants for widening ar.d improvements
of Hamilton Street Bridge Crossing.
Close out P2-23 -l
a . Ad j ustme nt of quantities
b. Landscaping modifications -$1,000 deduct (Possible time ext)
c . Miscellaneous paving improvemen ts , pipe supports , etc .
Approx $8 ,000 to $9 ,0 00 + time ext
d . C l ose Ou t Agreement
Approve plans and specifications for Job #-093 -Two ton hoist
Approve pla ns and specifications for PW -0 66 -Modification of existing
sludge hopper outlet
Execution of agreement between Districts and LA/OMA to conduct sludge
dewatering studies .
Close Out Job No . PW-055/\_ Odor Contro l
Advertise for surplus gravity filters instal l e d o n JP L-ACTS 1-MGD
Facility
DISTRICT NO . 1
Noth ing
DISTR I CT NO . 2 . .
Approve plan s and specifications Richfield Subtrunk Job 2 -19
Advertise for bids -Bid date June 1 3
Approve plans and .s pecifications Kellogg Subtrunk Job No. 2-20
Advertise for bids -Bid date June 13
,
DISTRICT NO. 2 ·(continued)
Accept easement for Richfield Subtrunk from City of Placentia
/License Agreement with Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe for Richfield
~d Kellogg Subtrunks .
Acceptance of sewer easement from Santa Fe Land Company for instal-
lation of sewer in.Kellogg
Authority for Selection Committee to negotiate with Lowry & Associates
for preparation of plans and specifications for reinstallation of the
Olive Subtrunk at Katella Avenue crossing the Santa Ana River
Receive, file and initiate Carusillo Annexation No. 31
DISTRICT NO. 3
Change Order No. 3 to Contract 3-20-3 -Field Closure $7,983 Add
Progress Report on 3-20-3 and 3-22
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
Nothing
DISTRICT NO. 7
: . '
DISTRICT NO. 11
Enter into Reimbursement A,greement with City of Huntington Beach to V construct portions of Master Plan trunk sewers
May 10, 1978 Joint Mtg.
Election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern
Question was asked regarding voting procedures and if there is a
tie vote. TLW advised that last year each District how they would
set up their ballot.
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 6
DISTRICT 7
for Chairman
Anthony nominated/but he withdrew from nomination.
Rima nominated. No futher nominations. RIMA elected.
Sharp nominated for Chairman pro tern. No further
nominations. SHARP elected.
Wedaa nominated for Chairman. No further nominations.
WEDAA elected.
Smith nominated for Chairman pro tern but withdrew.
Holt nominated. No further nominations. HOLT elected.
for Chairman.
Olson nominated I Svalstad nominated. No further
nominations. Passed out ballots to District 3 Directors.
SVALSTAD elected.
Griffin nominated for Chairman pro tern. No further
nominations. GRIFFIN elected.
Ryckoff nominated for Chairman. No further nominations .
RYCKOFF elected.
Riley nominated for Chairman pro tern. No further
nominations. RILEY elected.
Mcinnis nominated for Chairman. No further nominations .
MCINNIS elected .
Rima nominated for Chairman pro t ern . No further
nominations. RIMA elected.
Sm ith nominated for Chairman. Vardoulis nominated.
Williams nominated. Passed out ballots. TLW announced
they had one candidate with three votes and t wo candidate s
with two votes eac h. Would revote . Passed out second
set of ballots. VARDOU LIS elected .
Smith nominated for Chairman pro tern. No further
nominations . SMITH e le cted .
DISTRICT 11 -Shenkman nominate d for Chairman. No further nominations.
SHENKMAN elected .
Pattinson nominated for Chairman pro tern . No f urther
nominations. PATTINSON e lected.
(8-a) Report of Joint Chairman
Chairman Saltarelli called a meeting of the Executive Committee
for Wednesday, May 24th, and invited Directors Miller and Perry to
attend. Perry advised that he couldn't make it that day and he
then invit3-d-Director Olson . Olson indicated that he would be
there anyway as a member of the Fiscal Policy Committee .
Saltarelli then reported that we have been preparing for a dedication
ceremony for the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 which
was tentatively scheduled for May 4th. In conjunction with a visit
by President Carter to California, the White House staff and EPA
were considering his appearance at the dedication , but due to other
commitments , he could not attend the dedication . The ceremonies have
now been put off until June , when we expect a visit from the EPA
Administrator , Douglas Costle. As soon as a date is established,
will notify the Directors .
(8-b) Report of the General Manager
(8-c)
Mr. Harper referred to the new information booklet in the Directors'
folders and advised that we will be handing these out to the public.
Advised that new Directors may wish to put the 31st of May on their
calendars. Will have a new Directors' orientation meeting beginning
at 6:00 p .m. and will serve a light dinner . Will probably last about
2~ hours which will include a tour of the facilities here at Plant 1 .
Reported that staff is still working , along with other major ocean
dischargers, on an EPA waiver of secondary treatment requirements .
They have been published and we have 45 days for comment period
which ends on June 9th. We are having a meeting of major dischargers
here on the 25th of May at which time we will prepare our comments .
Said he understood that the State would be sending a letter to EPA
in the next couple days saying that if regulations stand as proposed,
no discharger in California could receive a waiver. Are attempting
to get EPA to release some of the regulations. Regulations are very
rugged and yet they are telling State officials they will accept
newly adopted ocean plan for California. Not sure what EPA is trying
to do. Their greatest concern is dischargers on East Coast who are
applying for waiver . Said State has substantial amount of dollars
for secondary treatment and they are concerned if there are long
delays in getting ansers, will lose money as it will go back to federal
government. We are trying to work with State on this . Numerous
problems. We have until September 24th to complete application for
waiver.
Report of General Counsel
Said he would report on a couple items on the agenda as they came up
such as Conflict of Interest Code.
Saltarelli then added one other item to his report . Said annual
election for Joint Chairman is in July. Directors should be pre pared
to make nominations for Joint Chairman in June . Saltarelli also
advised that he would not seek nomination for another year. Wedaa
asked if .he would not seek nomination , would he take it if nomina t ed .
He said he didn 't think so. We daa asked if he would d e cline th e n.
Saltarelli answe r e d y e s, p r oba bly. Th e n a d e finite y e s.
-2-
(13-c) Conflict of Interest Code
Quest ion was asked i f we came to a fina l resolution re using
existing Conflict of Interest statements. TLW answered yes. We
have substituted us e of our forms with schedul e of FPPC . Can
use city's form provided you say whe n you file that you are reporting
for entire District area and not just city. Transmittal letter
can point that out. Directors can still file separately here if
they choose with those schedules on our own forms.
It was then moved, seconded and carried to adopt Reso lution 78-100 .
(13-d) Self-Insurance
Motion made to approve i tems (1) (2)&(3). Seconded and carried.
Perry voted no on motion.
(14) Re Jarvis-Gann
Asked for a h a nd vote to see if Directors wanted to take a posi t ion
on Jarvis-Gann. 11 voted for taking a position and 1 7 aga i nst taking
a position. Was decided District wou ld not take a position either
way.
(16-b) Re Go ldenwes t Fertilizer Agreement
Mr. Harper reported that we have been advised that Goldenwest Fertilizer
is going to l ose the ir l ease on Irv ine prope r ty at the air station.
Have been working with The Irv ine Company and IRWD to try to resolve
a very immed i ate prob l em -Where do we take the sludge if Goldenwest
can't take it or process it? If we take i t to a land fill , have to
get it at 25% solids. Present ly 18-20% solids . Can 't take it t o
sanitary l a nd fill in that condition. I n discussion with The Irvine
Company representatives , appears that if Goldenwes t can get their
property squared away , wil l extend lease to September 30 . Pr i mary
reason for problem is becuase of a ll the rains . Goldenwest needs
some addition al funds so that they can clean up the property as it
ex i sts today. The three-year agreement we have with them says that
afte r first year, they cou ld renegotiate if they could prove that
t hey have additiona l costs such as f u e l, mannpower, etc . Price now
is $2 .75/yard . They did submi t to us reasons for substantial
increase which was latter part of Decemb~r . We have asked fo r
additiona l information and n oth ing has be en resolved to date. Said
what we are ta lking about at the present t i me is additional amount
of $9,200 and increasing the yardage fee from $2.75 to $3.25 . Than
asked Tom Woodruff to go into more deta il on this .
TLW said Mr. Harper has basically pointed out the details of the
dilemma for both the Districts and our contractor. Said whi l e there
is some degree of dispute as to rights and obligations , under our
prese nt agreement, objective is to insure that commencing tomorrow
morning t h at the quantity of dige sted s ludge wi ll get out of here
and go someplace. They have a prob l em which appears to be an eviction
notice effective June 30th (or maybe October 1st actua l ly).
District would agree to pay to Goldenwest $5 ,000 up front and $5,000
when work is completed to develop and get into operation a site on
the Goldenwest Fertilizer property which i s really owned by The
Irvine Company. To get it suitable to accept up to 300,000 yards
per day and to keep the SWRCB and State and. The Irvine Company happy ,
have to restructure the property out there. Th ey can t h en provide
-3 -
to us a 19-20 acre parcel. Our contract is primarily a hauling
contract. They did agree to take all of our sludge which could
be 300,000 yards per day up to September 30th. In the meantime we
would be trying to acquire a site of our own, probably on The Irvine
Company property. Have been working on it for some time.
Saltarelli summarized that Board would be amending existing contract
in terms of payment of $9,200 and changing rate from $2.75 to $3.25
per yard.
Pattinson asked, why the big increase? Understand money to improve
property but not increase. TLW said contract executed in December,
1976, does provide for increase. They requested from $2.75 to $4.31.
Presented fuel cost and labor increases, etc. Contract does provide
that the Board at least consider escalation in price based upon
actual costs.
Svalstad added this is over an 18% increase . Asked if there is any
competition and if we have a choice.
FAH stated that we feel the $3.25 is justified . We have looked at
their records. They wanted more than that . We feel this is a fair
price. The other problem is that we do not have an approved site to
haul the material to. This is the only one in Orange County.
Smith asked if that information was certified . Was answered, no,
material was submitted to our accounting department and they reviewed
it.
Pattinson asked what assurance we have with regard to their site
preparation. Saltarelli answered we can't be assured so that is
why we want to negotiate with The Irvine Company and have a site
for ourselves. Right now there is a greater problem than escalation
of actual costs of the contract .
Wedaa said maybe should have staff review all the problems we have
had in getting rid of this for the new Directors. Saltarelli added
that it is the intent of staff and Executive Committee to secure a
site too as soon as possible.
Wedaa moved the staff's recommendation. Motion seconded .
Motion was restated: Increase rate to $3 .25/yard and authorize
increase in payment of $10,000. Asked for a split on the vote
for each item . Voice vote on $3.25 rate. Motion carried .
Re $10,000 to provide for site development, Shenkman said that was
not justified in his mind. Why are we putting up the money?
Saltarelli answered it was the rains that created the situation
and it won't hold the sludge without causing problems . TLW added
it is the only one in town, unfortunately. One of the disputes of
the agreement is do they have to take everything that we put out at
the plant. They say to the contrary. They are saying that the site
just won't accommodate it. Will actually accommodate it for about
four more months. They lost so much during the rains which washed
away. They have sales contracts to export the sludge which has
finally dried. Are going to get out of there permanently after
October 1st. Said they wouidn't do this if they had received their
increase at the beginning of the year when they requested it as
they would have probably received the $10,000 and would have absorbed
-4-
the increased costs . They didn 't get the increase and operated at
a loss because of fuel and labor.
Wil l iams said we have people here who aren't familiar with problem
but Section 208 area act documents actually cover this problem.
Moved to approve the $10,000. (actually, called for the question .
motion was already made) R@x±x«axxxx®kH~ $1 0,000 will be pai d -
$5,000 now and $5,000 later . Wi l l be amending present contract .
Asked if they would still be obligated to haul the sludge even if
we don 't amend contract . Answered yes , but they say they can't haul
it . I f we pushed , we might win the case .
Roll call vote. Motion carried.
(16-c) REL Report re Safety Committee
Ray advised that in the past we have received many complaints because
of construction work between Lincoln and Orangethorpe and have tried
different approaches to enlighten the public and let them know what
we are doing. Said this project was delayed six months . The contractor
for this portion of the Knott Interceptor, Kordick & Rados, went out
to school children to introduce them to a safety program . Seven
grammar schools and three high schools were involved . Showed them
a brief slide presentation and showed them some equipment . Then
solicited some school administrators to develop a safety procedure
program and to invite all children to participate by drawing posters .
We awarded two hardhats to winners of the best posters in each class .
Have another program for Junior High . Re ferred to posters on wall
from Buena Park school. Said staff just wanted to convey to Directors
and public that we are trying to make the minimum impact on the
community.
Salt~relli then asked that the new Directors that evening be introduced.
Introduced Gambina, Seymour Siebert, Stanton , Strauss and Velasquez.
-5-