The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-04-12\ ' p f' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING .. . . . DISTRICTS NOS.' 1, 2, 3,' 5, 6, 7 &··11 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 12J ·1973·~ 7:30·P.M. 10344 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled upcoming meetings: TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 FISCAL POLICY CO~ll1ITTEE -Thursday, April 6, 1978 at 9:30 a.m., -Tuesday, April 25, 1970 and -Tuesrlay, 1~ay 9, 19 78 -~ EXECUTIVE CO~ ... MITTEE -Wednesday, April 26, 1978 at 5:30 p.m. Month April May June July August September October November December January February March April COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 1084.C ELLIS AVENUE : FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 '--1 (714) 540-2910 (71-4) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Meeting Date Conunittee Meeting Date Apr. 12,, 1978 Apr. 26, 1978 May 10,, 1978 May 24, 1978 June 14,, 1978 June 28, 1978 July 12,, 1978 July 26,, 1978 Aug. 9, 1978 None Scheduled Sep. 13,, 1978 Sep. 27, 1978 Oct. 11,, 1978 Oct. 25,, 1978 Nov. 8, 1978 Nov. 22.a 1978 Dec. 13,, 1978 None Scheduled Jan. 10, 1979 Jan. 24, 1979 Feb. 14, 1979 Feb. 28, 1979 Mar. 14,, 1979 Mar. 28,, 1979 Apr. 11, 1979 Apr. 25,, 1979 II l'JOARDS OF DIRECTO RS County San itation Di stricts of Ora ng e Co unty , Ca liforn ia JOINT BOARD S SUPPLEMENTAL AG ENDA ITEMS APRIL 12) 19 78 -7:30 P.M. DI STR ICTS l , 2, 3 & 7 Pos t Office Box 812 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Voll ey, Ca li f., 92708 T e lephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962 -24 11 AG EM DA (5) Considera tion of motion to receive a nd file minut e excerpts from the following cities rega rd ing elections o f mayors and appointment of a l ternates, and seating n ew members of the Boards: ("kMa yor) City Di strict(s) Brea 3 Bue n a Park 3 Cyp ress 3 Fount a in Va lley 3 La Habra 3 La Pa l ma 3 Stanton 3 Tusti n 1 7 Yorba Linda 2 ALL DI ST RICT S Ac t ive Sal Gambina St a nl ey F. Meyer* Donald G. Hud son* Bernie Sval stad Earl C. Roget * Al a n I . Priest* Harry L. Mi ll er* J ames B. Sharp Dona ld Saltarel li Hen r y W. \Ved aa Alterna te Sam Coop e r * Don R. Griffin Otto J . La cayo Marv in P. Ad l e r * Robin Youn g Ronald Nyborg Ma rtha V. Weishaupt Ra l ph Welsh, Jr.* Ra l ph We l sh , Jr .* Irwin M. Fri ed* (1 3-a) Con s ide r a tion of motion to r ece ive a n d fi l e Stop Notice s ubm itted by Beacon Investment Co. dba Crenshaw Lu mbe r Company in t he amou nt of $1,544 .84 aga inst C. H. Leave ll & Co mpany , contractor for El ectric a l Re liability for 75 MGD I mproved Treatment a t Pl a nt No . 2 , Job No. P2-23-3 (1 3-b) Consid eration of motion to r eceive a nd file Stop Notice s ubmitted b y Con crete Til e & Anchor Corp. in the a.mo unt of $10,1 79.56 against C. H. Leave ll & Compa n y , cont r actor for Electrical Re l iability for 75 MGD I mproved Treatme nt at Plm1t No. 2, J ob No. P2-23-3 "'-'--~ ,... BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ~ ,.: ____ ;~ II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; California Post Off ice Box 8 l 27 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9270: : .. ]OJNT BOARDS· Telephones: Area Code 714 540-29}0 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE APRIL 12J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL.THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMED.IATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETI.NG IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute exc·~rpts, if any See supplemental agenda . (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 March 8, .1978, regular District 2 March 8, 1978, regular and · March 30, .1978, special District 3 March 8, 1978, regular District 5 March 8~ 1978, regular District 6 March 8, 1'978, regular District 7 March 8, 1978, regular District 11 -March 8, 1978, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel .(8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of rol 1 cnll vote motion rnti fying pnymcnt of clai"ms of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each Dis_trict represented, unless a Director expresses a· desire to vote· differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See pe1;ge(s) -"A" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND -See page(s) "A" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE "B" and "C" and "C" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 2 See. page(s) --~------~--~ DISTRICT NO. 3 See pa·ge ( s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 -See -page(s) DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(NN) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public i~ attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the·chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent-calendar. Conshlcration of action to approve all agenda items appea_ring on the consent cnlcndar not specifically removed fr~m s~me~ -2- ~-- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks, Specification No. A-088, to Trans West Ford in the amotmt of $30,405.16. See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Specification No. A-090, for purchase of Four (4) Personnel Carriers to Taylor-Dunn Company in the amount of $8,087.76; and for purchase of Three (3) Cargo Carriers to Nordco Industrial Products in the amount of $6,833.82. See page "F" (c) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-56, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation.and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $371,173.00. See pages "G" and ''H" (e) Consideration of motion approving Addendtun No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Acquisition of Plant Air Compre-ssor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-57, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Acquisi- tion of Plant Air Compressor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, to U.S. Equipment Co., Inc. in the amount of $43,276. 00. See pages "I" and "J" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-58, to receive and file bid tabulation and recoJJDnendation and awarding contract for Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-065, to Production Steel Company, Inc. in the amount of $14,950.00. See pages "K'' and "L" (h) Consideration of motion approving Resolution No. 78-59, authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award a purchase order contracts for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge in· an amount not to exceed $14,000 including tax and freight, and for Electrical Switch Gear for said motor in an amotmt not to exceed $7,000 including tax and freight. See page "M" (i) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Acquisition of Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. E-092, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Acquisition of Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Specification No. E-092, to Compressor Service in the amount of $114,570.00. See page "N" (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, granting a time extension of 63 calendar days to the contract with A & T Construction Company, Inc. for delays due to inclement weather. See p~ge "0" (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-60, accepting Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P" (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-61, accepting New Roof Hatches at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No .. J-6-lE, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving 'Final Closeout Agreement. See page "Q" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, authorizing .an addition of $14,089.74 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work and materials and granting a time extension of 51 calendar days due to inclement weather. See page "R" (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, authorizing an addition of $2,078.80 to the contract with C. H. Leavell & Company for electrical duct work and additional backfill and granting a time extension of 65 calendar days for additional excavation and due to.inclement weather. See page "S" (p) Consideration of mot~on to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by HW1tington Beach Equipment Rentals, Inc. dba Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals in the amount of $2,966.56, against C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No .. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (q) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Dornar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $10,973.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- . ·• '--1· ,. (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) of Resolution No. 78-61, authorizing Grant of 0 Flood Control District in connection with widening of the Santa from Garfield to the Pacific Ocean. See page ----- (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-62, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, decreasing the .salary range for Chief of Industrial Waste from Range 1060C ($1907/2375) to Range 1060A ($1881/2342). See page "T" (t) Consideration of actions in connection with initial preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements pursuant to recent amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal from Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with said initial ·preparation work, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000 (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal from John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with said initial preparation work, pn a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,500 (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-79, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. for Phase I revenue program work, providing for a·change in the payment provision to authorize release of retained monies due to days beyond the consultant's control caused by recent r.egulation revisions. See p~ge "U" DISTRICT 2 (v) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-66-2, ordering annexation of 1.75 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Via Vista Drive in the City of Anaheim, Annexation No. 17 -Country Hill Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-67-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with the City of Orange for maintenance of Stacey Lane pumping station (Tract No. 9713) in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "V" (x) Consideration of motion authorizing negotiation with Rewes-Schock for purchase and installation of seven fiberglass protective covers inside manholes of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, and Reaches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No. 2-14-5, for flood hazard protection, for an amount not to exceed $9,000 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) · DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (;y) (z) (aa) Consideration of motion ratifying action of General Manager in filing a Notice of Interest re flood-caused damage to the Orange and Olive Sub-Trunks Santa Ana River Crossings with the State and Federal Disaster Office Consideration of Resolution No. 78-68-2, .approvi~g agreement with Yorba Linda County Water District for deferral of annexation fees in connection with Annexation No. 21 -Upper K Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (Board previously authorized preparation of agreement on 6/29/77) See page -~''W~'-'~~ Consideration of Resolution No. 78-69-2, approving agreement with Broad.moor Homes, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda for deferral of annexation fees in connection with Annexation No. 24 -Tract No. 9813 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (Board previously authorized preparation of agreement on 6/29/77) See page __ "X_'-'--~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Repair o.f Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing a deduction of $104.68 from the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation to replace 25 sacks of cement borrowed from Districts' warehouse.due to mavailab.ility of said material. See page "Y" (cc) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $481.50 from the contract w~th F. B. Cook Corporation and granting a time extension of 100 calendar days due to delays in procurement of plastic cement and inclement weather. See page "Z" (dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-71-3, accepting Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Tnmk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page · "AA" (ee) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, authorizing a change in pipe size from 45 inch to 48 inch R.C.P. and changing the starting point of the project from Orangethorpe and Knott Avenue to Orangethorpe and Western Avenue, at no additional cost to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. See page "BB" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) -6- ;· (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) ~ DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (ff) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study re evaluation of environmental impacts relative to the Westside Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3~13-1; and authorizing staff to prepare Negative Declaration and give notice thereof in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. See page "CC" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (gg) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-72, approving plans and specifications for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, and ratifying advertising for bids received on March 30, 1978. See page "DD" (hh) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, indicating the requirements of the State Highway Encroachment Permit (ii) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-73, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit S, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, to Rodding-Cleaning Machines, Inc. in the amount of $216, 114. 25 • See pages "EE" and "FF" DISTRICT 5 (jj) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-74-5, ordering annexation of 1.095 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity adjacent to the San Joaquin Hills Reservoir in the City of Newport Beach, Annexation No. 8 -Tract 8725, Harbor Ridge Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5 DISTRICT 7 · (kk) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-75-7, ordering annexation of .472 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan Heights area, Annexation No. 65 -Schymick Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (11) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-76-7, ordering annexation of .4001 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of Meads Drive and Morada Drive in the City of Orange, Annexation No. 68 -Frantz Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 ~ (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 8) -7- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 7) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (nun) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-7{-7, ordering annexation of 10.000 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Bent ·Tree Lane, Annexation No. 73 -Tract No. 9271 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) (nn) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from G. L. Lewis Company for annexation of 7. 082 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of Santiago Canyon Road and Jamestown Way in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and reconunendation. See page "GG" ---------- END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if ariy -8- f (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive CoJJDnittee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items reconnnended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for design of solids handling and dewatering facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (b) Consideration of actions relative to Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 208 Area-Wide Planning Study for the South Coast area: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-63, relative to the SCAG 208 (Area-Wide Planning Study for the South Coast area) draft Early Action Plan Design--Management of the Sewage Sludge of the :San Diego Creek Watershed Area. See page "HH" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-64, relative to the SCAG 208 (Area-Wide Planning Study for the South Coast area) Milestone Report. See page "II" ------ (c) Consideration of actions re continued representation in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies by retiring Director: (1) (2) Consideration of motion approving continued representation by retiring Director Don Winn in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies through the Association's annual meeting in ~ugust, 1978 Consideration of Resolution No. 78-65, authorizing payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in c"onnection with District representation in the California Association of. Sanitation Agencies by retiri:ng Director Winn. See page "JJ" (13) ALL DISTRICTS Other busin~ss and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (14) DISTRICT 1 -Other business and communications or supplemental ~genda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (16) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- (18) DISTRICT 6 Other business and conummications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 11 Other business and conuntmications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion authorizing the sale of pip.e previously purchas~d under Contract No. 5-20A to County Sanitation District No. 2 for use in emergency repairs to the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, at the current market price of $ per foot (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and commwiications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of items relative to the outstanding balance from Orange Park Acres Association re concurrent Annexation No. 51 and Bond Authorization proceedings: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report and recommendation of General Counsel re outstanding balance from Orange Park Acres Association re concurrent Annexation No. 51 and Bond Authorization proceedings. See page "KK" ------ (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to write off the amotmt $5,062.08 due from Orange Park Acres Association in corutection with concurrent Annexation No. 51 and Bond Authorization proceedings (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-78-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7, re annexation policy, as amended, providing for levy and collection of area-wide plaruting study fee of $50 per acre for the area generally described as north of Chapman Avenue and east of Santiago Boulevard. See page "LL" (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 7 -Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- c • • (28) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions re proposed annexation of approximately 241 acres -Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1978, requesting deferral of payment of fees on approximately 53 acres of permanent open space that will be dedicated to the Cowity of Orange. See page "MM" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1978, requesting that annexation acreage fees in the amolDlt of $254,472.09 on the balance of approximately 188 acres be spread over a four-year period. See page "NN" (c) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve deferment of annexation acreage fees on approximately 53 acres of property contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2, subject to execution of agreement between Anaheim Hills, Inc., City of Anaheim, County of Orange and the District, in form approved by the District's General Counsel, providing for payment of said fees in the event the property is later developed, at the rate in effect at the time of such development (d) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve agreement between Anaheim Hills, Inc. and the pistrict, in forma approved by the District's General Cotmsel, providing for payment of annexation fees on approximately 188 acres contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2, in equal annual installments over a four-year period--1/4 to be paid prior to initiation of annexation proceedings and the balance to be paid in three equal annual installments with interest at the rate of 8% on the tmpaid balance (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re storm damages to Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing: (a) Status report re Orange Suh..-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossi.ng (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-70-2, commending John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for their outstanding work in connection with emergency repairs to the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing. See page "00" (30) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion fixing P.M., , 1978, at as the time and place for public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (Time and place to be established by the Board. Directors have tentatively determined to conduct said hearing at the Brea City Hall.) -11- • .. (31) DISTRICT 2 • Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 2 u Consideration of motion to adjourn u -12- ,--..-~; ,--_, BOA RD S O F Dll1 ECT ORS County S onil otion Dislricts Po st Office Box 8 127 j { II of Oro ngc County, Ca lif o rni a 10844 Elli s Av e nue Fountain Voll ey, Calif., 92705 Telephones : JO INT BOA RDS A rco Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (1) (2) (3) ~) MEETING DATE APRJL 12) 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTO R DES IRIN G ADD ITI ON AL IN FOR MATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM) PLE ASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPAR TM ENI HEAD . IN ADDITION) STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M, I MMED IAT ELY PRECEDING WED NESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROO M ADJOINI NG THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. Pledge of All egi a n c e and Invo cation Roll Ca ll Appointme nt of Ch ai rm e n pro t e m, if n ecessary Re co gnition of s p e cia l guests -~~~ -----~ UI STR I CTS l , 2 , 3 C 7 M \ '.'.::> (S) Con s id ~r a ti o n . cf mo tion to r ecci vc and f j l e mi nut e exce r pt s from t he A OJ !JUr?;!'.4.;.·~:: r::-:~.:: CQ~,;p r. '. .. : -. :: &/ FILES f. ' :·:•. ._,... RESCi UT·':~ C' LETIE'.:~ \· •... ' •• MIN UTES :. ~ ... :'.. ••. ~. .,..,..- MINUTES HLE~ ................ · ITEMS ON fo ll ~w rn g CltJ.es re~~rding e lcc tfons o f mayors a nd a ppo intme n t o f SUPPLEMENTAl AGENDA alt erna t es , and s c a .:ing 11 CI·: mem b e r !" of t h e Board s : (*Ma yor) City Di s t r i c t(s ) n a -----Lcnu ....... _ Brea 3 A/C .... TKLR .••• Bu e na Pa r k 3 Cyp r es!; 3 F o ~a ll ey ....:9 ~ 3 ,._ 3 La Ha bra 3 La Pa l ma 3 Stantoa 3 Tu stin ~ 7 Yorba Linda 2 Ac t i v e Al tern a t :: Sa l G:un bi n a S am Cooper '· Sta nley F. ~le y c r~Don R. G:·i f f i n Dona ld G. Hu d son* Be rni e ~l st a d ~~" Ea r l C. Rog e t* Al a n J . Priest* Ha r ry L. Mi lle r * Jame s B. S ha r p Don a l d Sa lta r e ll i He n ry IL Wed a a Ot t o J. La c a y o ~!;l.f:· Adl e.,[* 'J ~ Robin Yo un g '\ -r Ron a ld Ny berg Mart ha \I. J•;e i !.h a up t Ra l ph We l s h , Jr .* Ralp h Wel s h , Jr .• I r win M. Fr i e d * Dj s tri c t 11 March 8 , 1978, r e gul a r ( 7) ALL Dl STRl CTS Re p o r ts Of: ~) Joint Ch o i rma n ~) Ge n era l Ma na g e r @ Ge n em 1 Cou n s e l ., (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE ••••• -Cons~d7ration of ro~l call. vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the J01nt and indi v1dual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, 11nlcss a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 3 See pa·ge ( s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page (s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 ... See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vole or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(NN) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent cnlcndar not specifically removed from same • .. 2- (9) (CO NSENT CALENDAR contin ue d from pnge 2) F1LE ············-···· LEITER ............•. A/C .... TKLR .••• \)_D ~-T~ ,.. -\ FILE .•........•.•....• LEITER ···-··--·- A/C .... TKLR -· l-9_.~_:!.!.4 FI LE ................. . LEITER .............• A/C •... TKLR •... ~----~ @ -----·-·· A/C .... TKLR / 7 Q.P.-~.: .... -r:tr-:::-.:::::'.::: .. . LEITER ............. . A/C .... TKLR ... . ---H-•OOOOOooo f,LE ···-··--·-··- LEITER ···········-- A/C .... TKLR - ~t: 3h3(;q v-- FJEl _.- ~ ···-··"{P ·······~ ~-:.._ A/C .... TKLR •••• .. \?. .. ?.,__~ v FILE -···············- LEITER ....••.•••..•• Fila ....... ~··- LEITER···-- A/C .... TKLR - ALL DJSTRlCTS (a) (b) Consideration of motion to receive a nd file bid tabulation and recommendation and a wa rding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks, Specificat ion No . A-0 88 , to Trans West Ford in the amoW1t of $30 ,405.16 . See page "E" Consideration of mo tion to receive and file bid tabulation and reconmmndation and awarding Specification No . A-090, for purchase of Four (4) Personne l Carriers to Taylor-Dunn Company in the amo unt of $8 ,08 7.76; nnd for purchase of Three (3) Cargo Carriers to Nordea Indust rial Products in the amount of $6, 833 . 82. See page "F" (c) Con sideration of motion approvin g Add e nda Nos . 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilita t ion of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No . I -lR, providing for miscellaneous technic a l clarifications (cl) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-56, to receive and file bid t a bulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Ellis Av e nu e Pump St a tion, Job No. I -lR, to Triad Mech a nical, Inc . in the amount of $371,173.00. Se e pages "G" and "H " (e) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . 1 to the plans and sp0cificat ion s for Acquisi t ion of Plant Air Co mpressor at Treatment Plant No. 2 , Job No. PW -064A, provitling for miscellan e ous technical clarifications ~~ (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 78 -57, to r ~eive and file bid tabul ation and recommendation and awardin g/contract for Acquisi - tion of Plant Air Compres sor at Treatm e11t Plant No . 2, Job No. PW-06 4A , to U.S. Equipment Co ., Inc. in the amount of $43, 276. 00. See pages "I" and "J" (g) Conside ration of Resolution No . 78-58, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Headworks "C " Grit Ho ppe r at Treatment Plant No . 2, Job No. PW-065, to Production Steel Compru1y , Inc. in the amount of $14,950.00. See pages "K" and 11 L11 (h) Consid eration of motion app r oving Resolution No . 78-59, authorizin g the General Manager to negotiate and <i 1~nrd a purchase order contracts fo r El ectric Motor for New Bird llB -64 , 000 Centrifuge in an amount not to exceed $14, 000 includin g tax and freight , and for Electrical Switch Gear for s::iid moto r in an amount not to exceed $7, 000 including tax and freight. See page 11 M11 (i) Considera tion of motion a pprovin g Addendwn No . 1 to the plans and specifications for Acqui s Hion of Gos Mixing Co mpres sors at Reclam ation Plant No . 1, J ob No . E-092 , providin g for misce llaneous t ec lmical clarifications (CONSENT CALENDAR continu ed 011 page 4) -3- (9) (CO NSENT CALENDAR continue d fr om page 3) ~---·~··/ @~----········· FI LE .................• LETTER ·······-···- A/C •••. TKLR .•.• FI LE ..........•..•..•. ~--~---- ~IC .... TK'! ••.• )~-~ FILE ...•...... .. . ~~~ A/C .... TKLR .... \)~--~ FILE ................. . LETTER ....•..•....•• A/C ...• TKLR -·· F1LE .•.....•••..•••••• LETTER ···········-- A/C .... TK LR __ F1LE ................•. LETIER ~~-~ A/C .... TKLR -·· (.~~ F.LE ...•...••......... LETTER ~--~ A~~) (..!.----······---- __...--... ··---- ALL DISTRICTS (Cont i nu e d) (j) Con sideration of motion to r ece ive a n d fil e bid t ab ul a tion and recomme ndation and awardi n g Ac quisition of Gas Mixi ng Compressors at Reclamatj on Pl a nt No . l, Spe cificat i on No . E-092 , to Comp ressor Service in the am ount of $ll4,570 .00 . Se e page 11 N" (k) Cons i de ration o f mot ion approving Ch an ge Order No . 1 to the plan s a nd speci fi cations fo r Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J -13-1, grant in g a time ext ension of 63 cal endar days to the con tract with A & T Construction Company , Inc . fo r de l a ys due to inc l eme nt weather . Se c page "0" (1) Consid e ration o f Resolution No . 78-60 , accepting Shops a nd War6house Sewer Lateral, Job No . J-1 3-1 , as compl ete; a uthori zing execution of a Noti c e of Compl et ion; and a pproving Final Clo seo ut Ag reemen t. See p age 11 P11 (m) Con sideration of Resolution No. 78-61, accepting New Roof Hatches at Ocean Ou tfall Pump ing Station , Job No . J -6-lE, as comp l ete ; author izing execution of Not i ce o f Com p l etion ; and approving Fina l Closeout Agreement . See page 11 Q11 (n) Con sideration of motion approving Ch an ge Order No . 6 to the plan s a nd specifications for Flood Wa ll a nd Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Tr e atm e nt at Plant No . 2 , J ob No . P2-23 -l, authorlzin g .an addition of $14, 08 9. 74 to the contract with Pasca l & Ludwi g , Inc. for mi sce llaneo us additional wo r k and ma t erj a ls an d gr anting a time extension of 51 cale ndar days du e to in c l ement we a the r . See page 11 W1 (o ) Consid eration of mot ion approving Ch an ge Order No . 3 to the p l an s and sp e cificatio ns for El ectTical Reliability for 75 MGD Im proved Treatme nt at Pl a nt No . 2 , J ob No . P2 -23 -3 , aut horizing an ad dit ion of $2 ,078 .80 to the contract with C. H. Leave ll & Compan y fo r e l ectrical duct wor k an d add i tional backfill and gra nting a t ime extension of 65 cal endar days for addit ional excav<!tion and du e to in clement weather . See p age "S" (p) Consi derat ion of mo t i on to receive and fil e Stop Notic e s ubmi t ted by Hunt ington Be ach Equipment Rent a l s , In c . dba Huntington Beach Equipm0 nt Re ntals in the amou n t o f $2 ,966 .56 , against C. H. Leavell & Co mp<:my, c ontracto r for Elec trical Re lia bilit y for 75 MGD I mprov ed Treatment at Pl a nt No . 2, Jo b No . P2-23 -3 (q) Consideration of moti on to r eceive a nd fi l e Stop Notic e submitted by Do ma r El ectric, Inc . in the a mount of $10,973.0 0 aga in s t Skipper & Company, contractor foT Int erpl ant Odo r Contro l Fa ci l ities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No . Plv-055 -1 (CONSENT CALE NDAR con tinued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT C/\LENDAR continued from p age 4) F.IE ------·-·· LETTER -···········- A/C .... TKLR ...• FILE ......•..•........ LETTE R ............. . A /C .... TKLR •••• ®-~---·-- LETTER i.~.k~ A/C •... TKL~ ?~.D.~. ~ e---~---------~-V' LETTER ~----·· A/C •..• TKLR .••. /~~ ~ FILE .....•........•... ~~~ A/C .... TKLR •... QV ... i/ ........ LETTER ············- A/C .••. TKLR -- :I.~~ .. : .. C!1 / . ~ /7v- FILE .............. - LETTE R ............ - e.::Q!.. -~v-WC T¥ ____ ALL DIST RICTS (Continued) -fit s iderat i on of Resolution No. 78 -61, authorizing Grant of Easeme nt D Flood Control District in connection with wi<lenh:g of the Santa A'i\a 1d"\lcr~l f;om Garfield to the Pacific Ocean. See p age ...... (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-62, ame ndin g Positions and Sal a ries Resolution No . 77-166, as amended, decrea~ing the salary r a nge for Chief o f Industrial Waste from Range 1060C ($1907/2375) to Range 106 0/\ ($1881/2342). See page 11 'f11 ~ Consideration of actions in connection with initial preparation of app lic ation for waiver of second a ry treatment require ments pursuant to recent amendments to the Federal \'later Pollution Control Act: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal from Southern Califor ni a Coa s t a l \'later Res earch Project for services in connection with said initial preparat ion work, on a per d i em fee basis for a !Jlaximum amo unt not to exceed $15,000 (2) Consider ation of motion to receive, file and accept proposal from John Carollo Engineers for s ervices in connection with said initia l preparation work, _on a p er diem fee basis for a maximum amo unt not to exceed $7,500 (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 78 -79, approvi n g Addendum No . 1 to agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. for Phase I revenue program work, providing for a chan ge i n the payment provision to authorize release of reta ined monies du e to days beyond the consultant's control caused by recent regulation r evisions . See page 11 U11 DIS TRICT 2 (v) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78 -66-2, ordering annexation of 1. 75 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Via Vista Drive in the City of Anaheim, Annexation No. 17 -Country Hill Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 2 (w) Con sideration of Resolution No. 78 -67-2, a pproving a nd authorizing execution of agreeme nt with the City of Orange for maintenance of Stacey Lan e pumping station (Tract No. 9713) in form approved by the General Cow1sel. See page 11 V11 (x) Con s ideration of motion authorizin g negot i ation with Rewes-Schock for purchase an d installation of seven fiberglass protective covers i n side manholes of S.mta Ana River Interceptor Sewer , Re ach 5, Contract No. 2-1 4 -4 , and Re aches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No . 2-14-5 , for f l ood hazard protection, for an arno tu1t not to exceed $9,000 (CO NSENT CALEND/\R continu e d on page 6) -5- (9) (CO NSENT CALE NDA R continued from page 5) FILE ................•. LETIER ............•. A/C .... TKLR ..•• A/C ..•. TKlR •.•.. f1U: •••·•··••··•••·•·• lffiER ···-··-·- A/C .... TKlR - . __ ................. ~ ... " fllE --- LETTER ···-·-·- A/C .... TKlR - f .l E ············-·--_-y--..,....-~>·····-- A/C~lR --· Qfc.·-·········-~ F!lE ............•....• l ETIER ·········-·- A/C .... TKLR - I DISTRICT 2 (C ontinued) (y) Con sideration of motion ratifying action of General Nanager in filing a Notice of Interest re flood-cau sed dama ge to the Or ange and Oliv e Sub-Trunks Santa An a River Cro ss ings with the Sta t e and Fed eral Di saster Office (z) Consid eration of Resolution No . 78-68-2 , app rovin g agreement with Yorba Lind a County Wat er District for d eferral of annexation fee s in connection wi th J\nnexation No. 21 -Upp er K Ranch J\nn exation to County San itation Di s trict No . 2 (B oard previous ly authorized preparation of agreement on 6/29/77) See page _11 _w_11 __ _ (aa) Con sideration of Resolution No . 78-69-2 , approving ag reement with Broadmoor Home s, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda for d eferra l of annexat ion fees in connection with Annexation No . 24 -Tract No. 9813 to County Sanitation District No . 2 (Bo ard previously authorized preparation of ag r eeme nt on 6/29/77) See page _"_X_11 __ _ DISTRICT 3 (bb.) Cons i deration of motion approving Ch an ge Order No. 3 to th e plan s and speci fic ations for Repair of Pl astic Lined Manhol e Shafts, Mill er-Hold er Trunk, Contract No . 3-lR-3, authorizing a deduction of $104 .68 from th e contract wit h F . B. Co ok Corporat ion to replace 25 sacks of cem ent borrowed from Districts' warehou se due to unav a ilability of s a id materia l. See page 11 y 11 11 (cc ) Con sideration of motion approvin g Cha n ge Or d er No. 4 to the pl a n s and specification s fo r Repair of Pl astic Line d Manhole Shafts , Mi ller-Jlolder Trunk, Contract No . 3-lR-3, authorizing I an a djus t me nt of engineer 's quantit ies for a total d e duction of $481. 50 from the contract with r. B. Cook Corporation a nd granting a time ext en s i on of 100 calendar days due to delays in procurement of plas tic cem ent and incl e me nt 1ve at h er. See page 11 z11 (dd) Consideration of Reso lution No . 78-71-3, acceptin g Re pair of Pl astic Lined Ma nhole Shafts, Miller-Ilolder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, as co mplet e ; authorizing execut ion o f Notice of Compl et ion; a nd approvin g Fina l Clo seou t Agreeme nt. See page 11AA11 (ee ) Considera tion of mot ion a pp r ov ing Ch a nge Order No. 1 to the pl a ns and s pecification s for Oran gethorpe Re lief Trw1k Sewer, Reach 1 5 , Contra ct No . 3-22-1, a uthori zing a c ha nge in pip e size from 45 inch to 48 i nch R.C.P. and changing t he starting point of the proje c t from Ora n gethorp e and Knot t Av enue to Ora n get horp e a nd Western Av enue , at no addition a l cost to the contract with Pasca l & Ludwig, Inc . See page 11 88'' (CONSENT CALENDAR continu e d on page 7) -6- (9) (CONSEWf CALENDAR co ntinued from page 6) FI LE •.......•.•....... LETIER ............. . A/C .... TKLR .••• f ,Li:. LETIER ............ .. A/C .•.. TKLR .. .. ---- 9~- ~~-t.<C A/C .... TKLR .... 9..12 ... ~s-_ _... .............. ........ f .L E ................. . ~~~E~ .. v A/C .... TKLR •••• f,LE ................ .. r.:TIER ~ l\.f.r..::: '-'t~ ~ ..... ~c.... A/C .... TKLR -- >);xzd~_)?.J_~ ~ ................... . 0¢-1 .Ji r:<:__v-~""P-fi:: A/C .... TKLR - DI STRIC T 3 (Continue d) Con sideration of motion to r ece ive a nd file Initial Study re eva luat ion of environmental i mpacts relative to the We st s ide Force Main , Second Unit, Contract No . 3-1 3-1; a nd authorizing s taff to prepare Negative Declaration and give n otice t h ereof in accord a.nce with the Guidelines Impl ementing the California Environmental Qua l ity Act of 1970 , as a mend ed . See page "CC " DI STR ICTS 5 & 6 (gg ) Consideration of Resolution No . 78 -72 , approvin g p l a ns and s p ecifications for Sl ip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, and ratifying adv erti sing fo r bids received on Marc h 30 , 1 978 . See page "DD " (hh) Considera tion of motion approving Addenda Nos . 1 an d 2 to the plan s and specifica t i on s for Sl ip-Lining of Trunk B, Un it 5, Rocky Point to Li do Pump St ations, indicating the requirement s of the State Highway Encroachment Permit (E) Considerat i on of Resolution No . 78-73 , to receive and file bid tabu lation and recommendation and a1 ~ar din g contract for Slip-Lining o f Trunk B, Unit 5 , Rocky Point to Lido Pwnp Stations, Con tract No . 5-8-R, to Ro dding-C l eanin g Machines , Inc . i n the amou nt of $2 16 , 114. 25 See pages "EE " a nd "FF " DISTRICT 5 (jj) Con s ideration of Stand ~rd Resolution No . 78-74 -5, ordering a nnexation of 1. 09 5 acres of territory to the District in t he vicin ity adjacent to the San Joaquin Hills Reservoir in the City of Newport Beach, Annexation No . 8 -Tra ct 8725, Ha rbo r Rid ge Annexation to County Sanitation Di s trict No. 5 DISTRICT 7 (kk) Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 78-75-7, orderin g annexation of .472 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ladera Senda Lane jn t he Cowa n He j ghts area, Ann exation No . 65 -Sc hymi ck Anne x ation to County Sa nit ation District No. 7 (to a l so be an nexed to the 7th Se we r Ma intenance District) (11) Consideration of Standard Resolution No . 78 -76 -7, ord erin g annexation o f .400 1 acres o f ter r i-::ory to the District in the vicinity nort hwest of Mead s Drive and Morada Drive in the City of Orange, Annexa tion No . 68 -Fra nt z An n exation to Co un ty Sanitation Di s tric t No . 7 (C ONSG~T CALE NDAR con t inued on pag e 8 ) -7- (9 ) (CON SEN T CALENDAR continued from page 7) DI ST RI CT 7 (Continue d) (~~ Consid eration of Standard Resolution No . 78 -77 -7, ordering annexation of 1 0 .000 ac r es of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower La ke Drive and Bent Tree La ne, Annexa tion No . 73 -Tract No . 9271 to County Sanitation Distri ct No . 7 (to al so be annexed to the 70th Sewer Ma i nt enan ce District) (nn) Consideration of motion to r ece i ve and file request from G. L. Lewis Company for ann exation of 7 . 082 acres o f territory to th e Dis t rict in the vicinity southeast of Santiago Canyo n Ro ad and Jamestown Way in the City of Orange , and r efer to staff for study a nd recomm e ndation . See page "GG" (~~ ~o -~ ~~. 9'-l?ci ~o_ S Q-~~-'1 -)- END OF CO NSENT CA LE NDAR (10) ALL DI STRI CTS Con sideration of items deleted from c on sent calendar , if any -8- ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Exe c utive Committ e e a nd co n s ide ration of mo tion to receive a nd file the Co mmi ttee 's wr itten report (1 2 ) ALL DISTRICTS ~·~ '.... Con siderat ion of action on item s r ecommended by th e Execut ive Commit tee : LETTE ~\'?C a ) Considerat ion of mot i on aut horizing t h e Selection Committee to A/C -~··IH n egotiate with John Caro ll o Engin eers for d esjgn of so lids ---··-······-· h a ndling and d cwatering faci lities for 75 MGD Improved Tr eatment ---·--at Plant No. 2 (b) Co ns ideration of act ion s relative to Southern Ca lifornia Assoc iat ion of Governments (SCAG) 208 Area-Wide Planning St udy for th e South Co ast area.: ~_j~11 Call Vo\li Ur C;jsf ~ . . . . ~f1!9C-.a<D una nirnous DJllot \.Q]; Consid e rat ion of Re s oJ u tion No . 78 -63, r e lative to the SCA G 208 A/C •... TKLR •... l (Area-Wide l(iill.!J.:!Jl_g_St u dy for the South Coast area) draft ~~.!..i<>. m 7 Early Action ~~De sign --Manag erne nt of the Sewage Sludge of the .San Die g o Creek Watershed Area . Se e page ''H.J-1 11 Roll Call Vote or Cast 2 ) F.lc ................••. Unani mo us Ballot -/ c.&- Consideration of Resol u t ion No . 78 -64 , r elative to the SCAG 208 (Are a -Wide Pl ann in g Study f o r th e South Co a st area) Mi l eston e .,_:rneR .~L!C':!' k.. I\\\ S A/C .... TKLR - Report . See page 11 II 11 ------ ..,. .. u. ............... ~ F1l E ............•..... LETIER •...••.•.•..•• (c) Con sideration of act ions re co ntinued r epresentation in t h e California Association of Sanita tion Agenc ies by retiring Director : A'.C '.~'~.:: . ~ ···············-··Tl oll Call Voto or Cul Unanimous Ballot (2) .Conside ration of motion approving continued representation by r etiring Director Don \1/jnn in the Ca lifornia Associat i on of Sanitation Agencies thr ough th ~ As _s 9'ciation ' s a nnua l mee.tin g in August, 19 78 01. ~ ~ (_ l6JI V) c::--<--?/ u f . G.. f,lE ............•...••. LETIER ···-··-·'- A/C .... TKLR - Consideration of Resolution No . 78 -65, a u thori z in g pa)1n e nt of fees and reimbursement of expenses inc urred in connection with District r epresen tat ion in th e Californ i a Association of Sanitation Agencies by retiring Dire ctor Winn. See page 11 JJ 11 ==~-· ~ ALL DISTRICTS Othe r busines s and c ommunication s or suppl ementa l agenda items (13-a) FILE ... .nf:M~ .. 9N SU PPL EMEN1 Al GEN DA LETTER .. M l ~ A/C .... TKlR ... ) ~ ~-!.:?.fi3-b) --· .. iTrn:s .. oN M \s SUP PltMH4TAL AGENDA (14 y (15) Consideration of motion to receive and fi l e Stop Notice submitted by Beacon I nvestment Co . dba Crenshaw Lumber Co mp any i n th e amount of $1, 5411. 84 against C. H. Leavell & Company, con tr?-ctor for Electrica l Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 , Job No . P2-23 -3 Consideration o f moti on to receive a nd file Stop Not)cc subm itted by Concrete Tile & Anchor C:orp . in the amotJnt of $1 0 ,179.56 against C . H. Leave ll & Company , contrDctor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD I mpr oved ··r eat.ment a t P l <mt No. 2 , J ob No . P2-·23 -3 DISTRICT 1 d~ess a nCl ~~or supplemental agend a it ems , if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adj ourn g: 0 5 ~DI STRICT 3 C/ Oth er business and communications or s uppleme n ta l agen da i tems, if a ny (1 7) DI STRICT 3 Consideration of motion to a dj ourn fl : 2'P -9- (18) (19) (20) (21) (2 2) Fi l~···;·:········/ ~TIER ~ A/C •.•. TKLR .•.• ----··············-(23) (24) DISTRICT 6 Oth~ess and C-Ommu nications or s uppl e menta l agenda items, if a n y DISTRICT 6 Consideration o f mot ion to adj ourn <6".u'1 DipTRICT 11 o~ aifd-e.Gmmunications or s uppl emental agend a items , if any DI STR ICT 11 Consideration of motion to adj ourn 8 .D1 DISTRICT S Consideration of motion authorizing the sa J e of p ipe previously purchased und er Contra ct No . S-20A to County Sanitab o n District No. 2 for use in emergency repairs to the Orange Sub -Trunk Sa nta Ana Riv e r Crossing , at the current market price of $ cQ (,, . e-a per foot DIST RIC T 5 ~e-ss--amrc-o11~ic atio n s DISTRICT 5 or s uppl eme ntal agenda items , if any Considera tion of motion to adjourn j' D g _ ~DISTRICT 7 Consideration of items relative to the outsta nding balance from Orange FI LE··········~ @ieR fM- A/c .. ~.C Park Acres Association re concurrent .i\nnexation No . 51 a n d Bo nd Authorization proc eedjn gs : Con siderat ion of motion to receive and file report and recommend a tion of General Counsel re outstanding b a l a nce from Oran ge Park Acres Association re coi1 c urrent Annexation No . 51 and Bond Authorization proceedings . See page ''KK" ------ (b) \Considerat ion of motion authorizing staff to write off the ~mount $5, 062. 08 d ue from Orange ._p ark /\cr e s Association in comlJ;Ct :!:gn-w1 th concurrent Annexation No . 51 a nd Bond .i\uthorization proceedings !loll Call Vote r;r Cast (c) Unan imous Ballot Conside r a tion of Re s olution No. 78-78-7 , am e nding Resolution 75 -44-7, re annexat · olicy, as am e nded, providing for l evy co ll ection o ea-w ide ] -nn ing study fee of $50 p e r acre for en e r a lly d e scrib e n orth of Chapma n ./\venue and east of Sa ntiago Boulevard . See page "~ (26 ) DISTRIC T 7 ~d-c ommtmications or s uppl em ental agenda items, i f a ny (27) DI STRIC T 7 Consideration of motion to ad journ fb'.15 -10- (28) DI STRIC T 2 ~ .. 0 .. ' .. LETT ER ............•. A/C •.. .TKLR ...• ___ ................ .. __.. .................... . F1LE LETTE R ············•• A/C •.. :TKlR .... ········ ·················· ···-······"··········-· Con sideration of action s re proposed annexation of ap proximately 241 acre s -J\nncxat.ion No. 28 -Anah eim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitatio n Di s trict No. 2: (a ) (b) Con side ration of motion to receiv e and file l etter from An a heim Hill s , Inc., dated Febru ary 21, 197 8 , r e qu esting deferral o f paym ent of fees on appro x im a tely 53 a cres of permane nt op en s pa ce th a t will be tl e dicat ed to the County of Oran ge . See page "MM" Consideration of motion to re ceive and file letter from Anah e i m Hills, In c ., el at ed Pe bruary 21, 197 8 , requ es ting that annexation acreag e fees i n the amo unt of $254, 4 72. 09 on t h e ba l ance o f approxima tely 188 acres be spread over a four-year period. See p a ge "NN " f'] Con s id e ration of mo tion declaring intent to ap pr ove deferment of a nn exat i on acreage fees on approximately 53 acres of property contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to Cou nty Sanitation Di s t rict No . 2, subject to execution of agreement between Ana heim Hill s , Inc., City of J\naheim, ~-County of Orange a nd the District , in form approved by the '' (jDistric t' s General Counsel, provid ing for p ayme nt of said fe es in the e vent the property is l a t er develop e d, at the rat e in effect at the time of such deve lopme nt Con s ideration of motion declaring intent to a pp rove agreement between Anah e im Hill s , Inc . and the District, in form~ approved by the Di strict 's Genera l Coun se l, providin g for payment of ann exati on foes on approx im a t e l y 188 ac r es contained in proposed Annexation No . 28 -Anaheim Hills An n exation No . 7 to County Sanit at ion District No. 2 , in equ a l annu a l installments over a four-y ear period--1/4 to b e p a id prior t o initiat ion of annexation proceedin gs and the b a lance to b e paid in th ree eq u a l annua l installme nts with intere st at the rate of 8% on the unpaid balance me ···········-··-(c2"'9)\ DISTRICT 2 t mt:R ...... -~ Con sideration of items re s torm dam ages to Or a n ge Sub-Trunk Santa Ana A/C. .... TKl.R - ........... -.. -.. --- ...................... ..-- River Cro ssing: Status repo rt re Orange Sub.-Trun k Sa nt a Ana Riv er Crossing (~~) Consideration of Re s olution No. 78-70-2, co~n e ndin g John A. Artukov ich Sons, Inc . for the ir out s tanding wo r k in conne ct ion with eme rgen cy repairs to the Or a n ge Sub-TrW1k Santa Ana River Crossing . See page "00 " ---- (30) DI STR IC T 2 Con sideration of motion fl.x in g /) ~ 30 P .M., ~ ~ l , 19 78 , me ··-· .. ···-.. -·~ at BNA e.~ as the time and p1Cfur public hearing t mER .\!..0..l.'! <c. P on the Draft ~ · r onm ental Imp act Re por t for Carbon Canyon Faci lities MC .... TKl.R -Plan (Time and pl:ice to be estab li s h ed by the Board. Directors ha ve ~~~ t e ~t a tiv e ly determined to cond uc t s aid hearing at the Brea Ci t y Ha ll .) ~11 ~~~ ~. -11- .. , (31) D~~ O~ness and communications or supplemental age nd a items, if any (32) DISTRICT 2 Con s ideration of motion to adjourn ~ · d> -~ -1 2- -II l j • BOARDS OF Dm ECT ORS County Sanitation Districls Post Office Box 8 127 of Ora n91? County, Cal ifornia 10844 Elli s Avenue Fountain Volley, Cal if ., 927 0 ~ Telephones: ·JOINT BOARDS Arco Code 714 540 -2 9 10 962-241 1 AG EH DA MEETING DATE APRIL 12J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRI NG ADDI T IONA L INFO RMAT IO N ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEAS E CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPART MENI HEAD . I N ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE . AVA IL ABLE AT /:00 P .M. IM MEDlATE LY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN TH E CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOIN ING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pl e d ge of All egiance an d Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appo intment of Chairmen pro tern , if n ecessary (4) Recognition of special gues t s DTSTJUCTS 1, 2 , 3 & 7 (5) ~onsid~rat i~n.of motion. to receive a nd file minute exc erpts from the ITEMS ON following cities r egardrng election,; of mayors an d appo int me nt of SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA altern a t es ' and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) City District(s) Active Al t c rn ate Brea 3 Sal Ga.mbina Sam Coope r* Buena Park 3 Stanle)' F. Meye r* Don R. Griffin Cypress 3 Dona ld G. Hud son* Otto J . Lacayo Fountain Vall ey 3 Berni e Svalstad Marv in P. Adle r * La Habra 3 Earl C. Rog et* Robin Young La Pa l ma 3 Al an I. Priest* Ron a ld Nyborg Stanton 3 Harry L. Mille r* Martha V. Weishaupt Tustin 1 J ames B. Sharp Ralph Welsh, Jr.* 7 Do na ld Sa ltare lli Ral ph We l s h, Jr.* Yorba Li nda 2 Henry W. Wed a a I rwin M. Fried* District 11 March 8, 197 8, r egul ar (7) /\LL DISTRICTS Reports of : (a ) Join t Ch o.irm an (b) Ge n e r a l Ma na g er (c) Ge:nera1 Coun se l ng s, (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL VOTE Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of · ·--the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each ~ District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See pa·ge ( s) DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 ... See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(A) THROUGH 9(NN) All matters placed ~pon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be renoved from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular orde:r of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consjdcration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent cnlcn<lar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks, Specification No. A-088, to Trans West Ford in the amotmt of $30,405.16. See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Specification No. A-090, for purchase of Four (4) Personnel Carriers to Taylor-Dunn Company in the amount of $8,087.76; and for purchase of Three (3) Cargo Carriers to Nordco Industrial Products in the amount of $6,833.82. See page "F" (c) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-56, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue P.ump Station, Job No. I-IR, to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $371,173.00. See pages 11 G" and 1.1H11 (e) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-57, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awardi:ng contract for Acquisi- tion of Plant Air Compressor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, to U.S. Equipment Co., Inc. in the amount of $43,276.00. See pages "l" and "J" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-58, to receive and file bid . tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-065, to Production Steel Company, Inc. in the amount of $14,950.00. See pages "K'' and "L" (h) Consideration of motion approving Resolution No. 78-59, authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award a purchase order contracts for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge in an amount not to exceed $14,000 including tax and freight, and for Electrical Switch Gear for said motor in an amount not to exceed $7,000 including tax and freight. See page "M" (i) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Acquisition of Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. E-092, providing for miscerlaneous technical clarifications (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Acquisition of Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Specification No. E-092, to Compressor Service in the amount of $114,570.00. See page "N" (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, granting a time extension of 63 calendar days to the contract with A & T Construction Company, Inc. for delays due to inclement weather. See page "O" (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-60, accepting Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "P" (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-61, accepting New Roof Hatches at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, ·Job No. J-6-lE, as complete; authorizing execution· of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "Q" (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-1, authorlzing .an addition of $14,089.74 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work and materials and granting a time extension of 51 calendar days due to inclement weather. See page "R" (o) Copsideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, authorizing an addition of $2,078.80 to the contract with C. H. Leavell & Company for electrical duct work and additional backfill and granting a time extension of 65 calendar days for additional excavation and due to.inclement weather. See page "S" (p) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Inc. dba Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals in the amount of $2,966.56, against C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (q) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $10,973.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 (CONSENT CALENDAR cont~nued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) ideration of Resolution No. 78-61, authorizing Grant of Easement Flood Control District in connection with widening of the Santa from Garfield to the Pacific Ocean. See page ----- (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-62, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, decreasing the salary range for Chief of Industrial Waste from Range 1060C ($1907/2375) to Range 1060A ($1881/2342). See page "T" (t) Consideration of actions in connection with initial preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements pursuant to recent amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal from Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with said initial preparation work, on a per <liem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000 (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal from John Carollo Engineers for services in connection with said initial preparation work, .on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,500 (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-79, approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. for Phase I revenue program work, providing for a change in the payment provision to authorize release of retained monies due to days beyond the consultant's control caused by recent r_egulation revisions •. See page "U" DISTRICT 2 (v) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-66-2, ordering annexation of 1.75 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Via Vista Drive in the City of Anaheim, Annexation No. 17 -Country Hill Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-67-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with the City of Orange for maintenance of Stacey Lane pumping station (Tract No. 9713) in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "V" (x) Consideration of motion authorizing negotiation with Rewes-Schock for purchase and installation of seven fiberglass protective covers inside manholes of Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach S, Contract No. 2-14-4, and Reaches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No. 2-14-5, for flood hazard protection, for. an amount not to exceed $9,000 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (y) (z) (aa) Consideration of motion ratifying action of General Manager in filing a Notice of Interest re flood-caused damage t·o the Orange and Olive Sub-Trunks Santa Ana River Crossi.ngs with the State and Federal Disaster Office Consideration of Resolution No. 78-68-2, approving agreement with Yorba Linda County Water District for deferral of annexation fees in connection with Annexation No. 21 -Upper K Ranch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (Board previously authorized preparation of agreement on 6/29/77) See page ~"=W-"--~- Consideration of Resolution No. 78-69-2, approving agreement with Broadrnoor Hornes, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda for deferral of annexation fees in connection with Annexation No. 24 -Tract No. 9813 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (Board previously authorized preparation of agreement on 6/29/77) See page ~"-X_"~~- DISTRICT 3 (bb:) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing a deduction of $104.68 from the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation to replace 25 saoks of cement borrowed from Districts' warehouse.due to l.lllavailab_ility of said material. See page "Y" (cc) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $481.50 from the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation and granting a time extension of 100 calendar days due to delays in procurement of plastic cement and inclement weather. See page uzu (dd) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-71-3, accepting Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "AA" (ee) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, authorizing a change in pipe size from 45 inch to 48 inch R.C.P. and changing the starting point of the project from Orangethorpe and Knott Avenue to Orangethorpe and Western Avenue, at no additional cost to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. See page "BB" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) -6- (9) (CONSE~1T CALENDAR continued from page 6) 1..,,,,1 DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (ff) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study re evaluation of environmental impacts relative to the Westside Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1; and authorizing staff to prepare Negative Declaration and give notice thereof in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. See page "CC" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (gg) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-72, approving plans and specifications for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, and ratifying advertising for bids received on March 30, 1978. See page "DD" (h~) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, indicating the requirements of the State Highway Encroachment Permit (ii) Consideration of Resolution No. ·78-73, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contrac.t for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, to Rodding-Cleaning Machines, Inc. in the amount of $216, 114. 25 . See pages "EEn and "FF" DISTRICT 5 (jj) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-74-5, ordering annexation of 1.095 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity adjacent to the San Joaquin Hills Reservoir in the City of Newport Beach, Annexation No. 8 -Tract 8725, Harbor Ridge Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5 DISTRICT 7 (kk) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-75-7, ordering annexation of .472 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan Heights area, Annexation No. 65 -Schymick Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (11) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-76-7, ordering annexation of .4001 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of Meads Drive and Morada Drive in the City of Orange, Annexation No. 68 -Frantz Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 \..,.! (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 8) -7- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 7) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (nun) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-77-7, ordering annexation of 10.000 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Bent Tree Lane, Annexation No. 73 -Tract No. 9271 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) (nn) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from G. L. Lewis Company for annexation of 7.082 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of Santiago Canyon Road and Jamestown Way in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and reconunendation. See page "GG" ------ END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -8- (11 ) ALL DISTRICT S Report o f the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file th e Committee 's written r e port (12) ALL DISTRICTS Conside ration of action on items r ecommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with J ohn Carollo Engineers for design of so lids handling and dc1'1ater ing facilities for 75 MGD Impro v e d Treatment at Plant No. 2 (b) Considera tion of actions relative to Southe rn Ca liforn ia Association of Governments (SC AG) 208 Area-Wide Pl anning Study for the South Coast area : Roll Call Vole 15r ~sf ( 1 ) Un animous Dallo t Consideration of Re so lution No . 78-63, relative to the SCAG 2 08 (Area -Wid e Pl aJming Study fo r 'the South Co ast area ) draft Early Action Pl a n Design--Management of th e Sewage Sl udge of the San Di ego Creek Wa tersh ed Area . See p age "HH" Roll Ca ll Vote or Cast(2) .Unanimous Dallot Consid e ration of Re s olution No. 78-64 , rel ative to the SCAG 208 (Area-Wid e Planning Study for the South Coast area ) Mil estone Report . See page "II" ------ (c) Consid eration of actions re continued representation in the Cali forn ia Asso ciation of Sanitation Agencies by retiring Director : (1) Consideration of motion approving continued repres entation by retiring Director Don Winn in the California Associat ion of Sanitation Agenc ies thro gh the Associat ion 's a nnual~1 eting Rolf Call Vote or Cut .Unanimous Ba llot (2) in August, 1 978 (!'-.. ~C · • \, ti ~' {';... {;_,L .. , . ( H:· 1lt...<-{~ .-1• , ' ~, \.. C..,~ ..... "t1 ~ ~< cc .G · 1 -x.: Con s iderat i on of Reso l ution No . 78 -65 , aut horjzing pa)1Ilent of fe es an d r eimbursement of expenses incurred in conn ection with District represe ntation in t h e California Association of Sanitation Agencies by retiring Direct or Winn . See page ''JJ" (13) (1 3 -a ) !TEI.I S ON SU PPLEMrNTAl AGENDA (13 -b) ITEM S ON SUPPlEME NTJ.L AGE NDA (14)° ALL DI STRICTS Oth e r business an d commW1ications or supp l eme ntal agend a items Considerat i on of motion to receive and file Stop Notice s ubmitted by Beacon Investment Co . dba Crenshaw Lumber Company in the amount of $1 ,544 .84 against C. H. Leave ll & Company , contractor for Electrical Re l iab i l ity for 75 MGD Im.prove d Treatment at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2 -23 -3 Consitl erat i on of mo t ion to receive and fi l e Stop Jfotice submitted b y Concrete Til e & An chor Corp . in the amou nt of S l 0,1 79 .56 <lga i nst C. H. Leav e ll & Company , contractor for Electrical Reliabilit y for 75 MGD I mproved Treatment at Plant No . 2 , Job No . P2-23-3 DISTRICT 1 Other bu sin ess an d communications· or s upplemen tal agenda items , if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Con s ideration of motion to a djourn ~ ~ (1 6) DI STRICT 3 (1 7) Oth e r bu s ine ss and communicati on s or s uppl ementa l agen da it ems , if any ~ . t.' DI STR ICT 3 Considerat ion of motion to ad j ourn \/'o -9- (18) DISTRICT 6 (19) (20) (21) (22) Other business and comnn.mications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn y;61 DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn y;~1 DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion authorizing the sale of pipe previously purchased under Contract No. 5-20A to County Sanitation District No. 2 for use in emergency repairs to the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, at the current market price of $ ft'°~ per foot (23) DISTRICT 5 (24) (25) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn~ 'l 0 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of items relative to the outstanding balance from Orange Park Ac7es ~ss~ciation re co~current Anne~a~~!l No. 51 and4BQn1 ~ Authoriz. atipn proceedings. .u r..r /) .-Q (lC.c I: (JCLL-, -f-c,ec,J' Ui0c ·. c. .\ fr'" , .. r.l ij.LC c ( t ' , 1-·t'" • ~---L 1 JI I , l_; \;:_ \ '-~....J. '- (a) ·consideration of motion to receive and file report and recommendation of General Counsel re outstanding balance from Orange Park Acres Association re concurrent Annexation No. 51 and Bond Authorization proceedings. See page "KK" ------ (b) Consi ation of motion authorizing staff to write off the amount $5, due from Orange Park Acres Association in connection with concurreTit Annexation No. 51 and Bond Authorization proceedings Roll Call Vote or Cast ( ) Unanimous Ballot c esolution No. 78-78-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7, re anne ·on policy, as amended, 'providing for levy and collection of area-wi e ing study fee of $50 per acre for the area generally descriQed as ~th-Ef Chapman Avenue and east of Santiago Boulevard. See page "LL"'"' (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- (28) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions re proposed annexation of approximately 241 acres -Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1978, requesting deferral of payment of fees on approximately 53 acres of permanent open space that will be dedicated to the County of Orange. See page "MM" (b) (c) (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1978, requesting that annexation acreage fees in the amotmt of $254,472.09 on the balance of approximately 188 acres be spread over a four-year period. See page "NN" Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve deferment of annexation acreage fees on approximately 53 acres of property contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2, subject to execution of agreement between Anaheim Hills, Inc., City.of Anaheim, County of Orange and the District, in form approved by the District's General Counsel, providing for payment of said fees in the event the property is later developed, at the rate in effect at the time of such development Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve agreement between Anaheim Hills, Inc. and the District, in forma approved by the District's General Counsel, providing for payment of annexation fees on approximately 188 acres contained in proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2, in equal annual install~ents over a four-year period--1/4 to be paid prior to initiation of annexation proceedings and the balance to be paid in three equal annual installments with interest at the rate of 8% on the unpaid balance (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of items re storm damages to Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing: (a) Status report re Or~nge Suh~Trunk Santa Ana River Cross~ng Roll Call Vote or Cas(b) Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 78-70-2, commending John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for their outstanding work in connection with emergency repairs to the Orange Sub-Trtmk Santa Ana River Crossing. See (30) page "00" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion fixing 7,· 3 a P .M., ~-I I, , 1978, at l 1) r-Cfll Cd-(1._ C(' as the .time and place for public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan (Time and place to be established ·by the Board. Directors have tentat~vely determined to conduct said hearing at the Brea City Hall.) -11- (31) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 2 . r-·--1. Consideration of motion to adjourn~·,' -12- . J MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date April 12, 1978 -7:30 p.m. Pos t Office Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cal if., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-241 t The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comm ents in the Manag er's Report, we have expanded the description of the a g enda item in the agenda itself, particularly with reg ard to chang e orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. Joint Boards No. 9-a -Purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks. Included in the 1977/78 approved budget were funds for the purchase of two 9-yard dump trucks for the continuing solids hand- ling and digester cleaning operations. Bids were received on March 28 with the low bid being $30,405.17, and the hig h bid $32,857.88 . (Budget, $2 9,680). No. 9-b -Purchase of Electric Carts. Also included in the 1977-78 budg et were funds for the purchase ·of electric-powered personnel and cargo carriers. Bids were re- ceived on March 28, 1978 and it is recommended that the a ward be made for four (4) personnel carriers to Taylor-Dunn f o r $8 ,0 87.76, and the three (3) cargo carriers to Nordea Industrial Products for $6,833 .82 , for a total expenditure for all unjts of $14,921.58. (Budget, $15,900). No . 9-c & D -Job No. I-lR -Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pt.mlp Station . Bids were received on March 30, for the Rehabilitation of the Ellis Av e nue Pump Station located a t the inter s ection o f Bu s hard and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. The rehabilitation of this I pump station will a llow interception of raw wastewa ter go ing to Plant No. 2 for diversion to Plant No. 1 to maximize o ur new secondary treatment facilities in Fountain Va l ley. Three bids were received which ranged from a low of $37 1 ,173 to a max i mum of $421,500 . The engineer's estimate for this job is $335,000. After careful review of the bids submitted, the e n g ineer and staff recommend the awa r d be made to Triad Mechanical, Inc., of Stanton , for the low bid amount. Although the low bid is app r oximately ten percent over the engineer's estimate, the award is recommended since it does reflect a competitive_ price for the work .a s specified. Also on your agenda is the consideration of Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to the project, which were transmitted to all prospective bidders prior to receipt of bid . These addenda contain certain technical clarifications and traffic control requirements of the City of Fountain Valley which required clarification prior to receipt of bids. The staff recommends approval of both Addenda No s . 1 and 2. No. 9-e & f -Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Treatment Plant No. 2 -Job No. PW-064A. Three bids were received on March 30, 1978 for the acquisition of a Plant air compressor required at Treatment P l ant No. 2. The three bids received were $43,276, $44,998.70 and $4 5,682. (Engineer's estimate, $40,000). It is the staff's recommendation that the awar d be made to U. S . Equipment Company , Inc., of Los Ange les in the low bid amount of $43,276. Although the low bid is approxima t ely eight percent above the eng ineer's estimat e , the bids r~ceived reflect the cost of furnishing this equipment. Also included in your agenda is Addendum No. 1 for this project which contains certain detail technical clarifications which were necessary prior to submittal of the bids. The staff also recommends approval of this Addendum. No. 9-g -Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hoppers at Tre a tment Plant No. 2. On March 30, 1978, bids were rec e ived and declared for this needed modification to the gr it hoppers at Plant No. 2 . Only one bid was received which was from Production Steel Company, Inc., of Gardena, in the lump sum amount of $14,950. The engineer's estima te for this work is $20,000. Since the one bid received is from a responsibl--e contract or who has stipulated that he is fully aware of all the conditions of the specifications and is satisfied with his bid, the staff is recommending the award to Production Steel Compa n y, Inc., in the amount of $14,950, which is approximately 25 percent under the engineer's estimate. -2- • No. 9-h -Electric Motor and Switchgear for New Sludge Dewatering Centrifuge -Job No. P2-15-1A. Bids were solicited for furnishing an electric motor for the new Bird HB 64,000 centrifuge which has been recently delivered to the Districts' Plant No. 2 for solids dewatering purposes. Bids were scheduled to be opened and declared on March 30. No bids were received to supply the necessary e lectric motor for this centrifuge. Therefore, the staff is recommending that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate the purchase of the 150hp electric motor in an amount not to exceed $14,000 and for the appurtenant electrical switchgear in an amount not to exceed $7',000. The Directors will recall that in June, the staff was authorized to negotiate the purchase of this centrifuge, including motor and switchgear in an amount not to exceed $245,000. The staff success- fully negotiated the contract for the centrifuge alone for approxi- mately $211,000. With these acquisitions, the total purchase will be approximately $13,000 less than the Board's authorization of June, 1977. No. 9-i & j -Award of Job No. E-092 (formerly PW-064A) -Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant Nos. 1 and 2. At the March Board meeting, the Directors rejected the bids received for the furnishing of gas mixing compressors to be in- stalled at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Rejection was because the two bids received had several irregularities and it was in the best int e rest of the Districts that all bids be rejected and that the equipment be readvertised. New bids were received on April 4 from thr ee suppliers with the bids rang ing from a low of $114,570 to a maximum of $187, 773. (Eng ineer's estimate -$118,000). The staff recommends award of Job No. E-092 to Compressor Service of Los Angel es in the total bid amount of $114,570. No. 9-k & 1 -Acceptance of Job No. J-13-1 -Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral ($12,895). The contractor has successfully completed the Shops and Ware- house Sewer Latera l extension with no additional cost to the contract price. However, the staff is recommending a time extension of 63 calendar days to the contract because of inclement weather. It is the staff's recommendation that the Board accep t the work as com- plete in accordance with the plans a nd specifications. No . 9-m -Acceptance of J ob No'. J-6-lE -New Roof Hatches at Ocean Outfal l Pumping Station ($24,300). The contractor for the installation of the new roof hatches at the Foster Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2 has completed · the work a nd· fulfilled the ob lig ations of the contract. The staff recommend s acceptance of the work as complete in accordance with the contract specifica tions. -3- No. 9-n -Chan e Order No. Wall and Site Deve No. Addition o Contract No . P2-23-l -Flood Im roved Treatment at P ant This contract for the construction of flood wall and site improvements at Plant No. 2, which is a part of the 75-M~D of Improved Treatment at the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant , is nearing completion . Included in this change 9rder are ten items of work which ad d $22,684.73 to .the contract and deduct $8,594.99, for a net change order addition of $14,089.74 . The work included in this change order is relocation ·of electrical duct work because of differing site conditions in the installation of the 12 kv duct system; the realignment of one of the interior roads to better accommodate the oil well sites owned by Chevron Oil; overexcavation to remove unsuitable material and recompaction thereof; additional work and deletion of work in connection with the block wall, including an upgraded water seal and the elimination of a veneer fascia block ; elimination of temporary fencing and substitution thereof; utility interference with Pla nt water line requirin g the relocation thereof ; and the installation of two additional vaults for access to sludg e lines. This chang e order also includes the extension of 51 calendar days for inclement weather and delays resulting therefrom. This change order has been reviewed by the State Water Resources Control Board's representative and the staff recommends the action appearing on the agenda. No. 9-o -Chang e Order No. 3 to Contract No. P2-23-2 -Electrical Reliability for 75-MGD Improved Trea tment a t Plant No. 2. This contract for electrical reliability is a part of the 75-MGD of Improved Treatme nt at Plant No. 2. This chang e order adds $2,078 .80 to the contract price for additiona l electrical duct bank, revisions of a tread plate in the turbine generation control room and additional backfill required adjacent t o one of the Districts' utility tunnels. This chang e order also provi de s for a time extension of 65 calendar days for the work included in this chang e order and for in- clement weather and delays associated therewith. The staff has re- viewed this cha nge order with representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board and the staff recommends the action appearing on your agenda. · No . 9-s -Reclassification of Position of Chief of Industrial Waste. Mr. John Thomas, the Districts' Chief of Industrial Waste, sub - mitted his resi g nation effective March 3 1st. In analyzing the job description for replacement of Mr. Tho mas, the staff is recommending that the Chief of Industrial Waste position be reclassified from -4- salary range 1060C (1907/2375 monthly) to Range 1060A (1881/2343 monthl y). This reclassification is recommended to reflect the responsibilities of this position comparable to that of the senior engineer position which is at range 1060A. No. 9-t -Initial Preparation of App lication for Waiver of Secondary Tr eatment Requirements. · In March, the Boards authorized the General Ma n ager to engage consultants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purpose of gathering the required information to submit an application to EPA for waiver of secondary treatment requirements for marine discharge. Pres ently, the Districts have draft copies of EPA's reg ulations con- cerning the application, which require that a waiver request must be filed no later than September 24 of this year. We have solicited proposals for initial work from the Southern C~lifornia Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) on a per diem basis in an amo unt not to • exceed $15,000, to obtain additional oceanog raphic data and from John Carollo En gineers on a per diem basis in an amount not to exceed $7,500 regarding the adequacy and effectiveness of the Districts' source-control prog ram, capability of the treatment plants, and function of the outfall diffuser system. At this time, we do not know the extent of the engineering services that wi ll be required, but EPA 's requirements appear to be extremely extensive and demanding . The requested authority to engage SCCWRP and John Carollo Engineers will permit us to begin the required work. It is anticipated that additional money a uthorizations will be required in the near future once the EPA waiver reg ulations are finalized . No. 9-u -Addendum No. 1 to Agreement for Phase I Preparation of District Revenue Prog ram. The staff is recommending approval of an addendum to the agree- ment with Peat, Marwick , Mitchell and Company, District auditors, to releas e a contract retention of $5,069.14 for the Phase I preparation of the Districts' Revenue Program. In May, 1977, the Districts approved a $66,356 contract for the initial preparation of the State and federal l y -required Revenue Program. Phase I is complete except for changes which will be re- quired as a result of the implementation of the 197 7 Amendme nts to the Federal Water Pollut ion Control Act. The provisions of our agree- ment with P ea t, Marwick, Mitchell Company were to withho ld a percen - tage of the contract until the program was implemented; however, bec ause of d elays caused by the unknowns of EPA 's regulations and the Jarvi s-Gann problem, the State Board staff h as recomme nded we delay final completion of the Revenue Program until these matters are re- solved. Therefore, it is the staff's reconnnendation that Addendum No. 1 -5- to the agreement with PMM be approved releasing the retained monies. District No. 2 No. 9-v -Ordering Annexation No. 17 . The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has approved the annexation and the proponents have paid all required fees. The staff reconnnends adoption of the standard resolution ordering annexa- tion of approximately 1. 75 acres in the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Via Vista Drive, City of Anehim. No. 9-w -Authorizing Maintenance and Operation of a Pump Station for the City of Orange. A small pump station is required for the development of Tract No : 9713 which is a small subdivision within the City ·of Orange. The City of Orange does not at present have any pumping stations, and therefore they do not have experienced personnel on their staff. Since the Districts do have contracts with the County Supervisors for the maintenance a nd operation of the 3rd, 7th, and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts at cost plus 15%, the staff is re comme nding that District 2 authorize execution of an agreement with the City of Orange with the same terms to maintain and operate this s mall sewage pumping station for the City. No. 9-x -Authorizing Purchase of Fiberglass Protective Covers for Manholes on Santa Ana River Interceptor. During the recent rains , the staff maintained close surveillance of District sewers affected by storm runoff . Seven of the.manholes installed on the Santa Ana River Interceptor northerly of Impe rial Highway, which are adjacent t o the River, became exposed because of errosion of the soil. Although no damage occurred in any of these manholes, the staff recormnends the instal lation of a fiberglass pro - tective cover which would be ins~alled inside each of the manholes on the manhole shelf near the top of the sewer pipe. In the event the manhole shaft was damaged or displ aced by flood waters, this fiberglass protective cover would prevent volumes of flood waters, mud and debris from entering the sewer system. These fiberglass covers are a proprietary product and the staff is reconnnending that the General Manager be authorized to award a contract for these seven protective covers at a negotiated contract price not to exceed $9,000. No. 9-z -Deferral of Annexation Fees re Annexation No. 21. In June, the Board authorized deferral of annexa tion fees for a water storage tank site of the Yorba Linda County Water District of approximately 4~ acres. Resolution No. 78-68-2 approves an agreement with the water district for deferral of annexation fees until such time as the property may need sewerage service. The staff recommends approval. -6- No. 9-aa -Deferral of Annexation Fees for Annexation No. 24. Last June, the Board approved a proposal by Broadmoor Homes, Inc., to annex approximately 377 acres of land within the City of Yorba Linda. Nearly 28 acres are proposed t o be dedicated as public parks within the City of Yorba Linda and the Board agreed to defer payment of annexation fees fo r those land s for an indefinite period of time, and furthe r agreed to defer payment of the annexation fees for the balance which had been divided into four areas containing around 323 acres. The due date for payment of fees for areas A through D were 6-30-77, 12-31 -78, 1 2-31 -79 and 1 2-31 -80. The fees which have been deferred are subject to the annexation charges in effect as of the above-mentioned dates. Th e parties to this agreement are County Sanitation District No. 2. Broadmoor Homes, Inc., and the City of Yorba Linda. Th e staff recol!11Ilends that the ag reement be approved. As of this da~e. the District has collected $127,338.40. District No. 3 No. 9-bb & cc -Chan ge Orders Nos. 3 and 4 to Contract No. 3 -lR-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Ma nhole Shafts -Miller-Hol der Trunk. During the repa ir of the plastic lined manhole shaf ts on the Miller-Holder Trunk, the contractor was unable to secure plastic cement to complete the work as specified. The District l oaned the contractor 25 sacks of plastic cem ent which was to be returned by the contractor . To date, the contractor has been unable to secure the plastic cement because of shortages . The staff is recommending acceptance of Change Order No . 3 deleting $1 04.68 from the contract price for material supplied to the contractor by the District. Ch ange Order No. 4 adjusts the engineer's q u antities for a deduction of $481.50. This change order also extends the contract time 100 calendar days because of inclement weather and delays in the procurement of the above-mentioned plastic cement. The staff recommends acceptance of these change orders . No. 9-dd -Acceptance of Contract No. 3 -lR-3. The contractor has completed the specified work a nd has complied with al l provisions of the contract. The staff recommends acceptance of the work as complete and the filing of a Noti ce of Completion for the project. No. 9 -ee -Chan §e Order No . 1 -Contract No. 3-22-1 -Orange - thorpe Relief Trunk ewer, Reach 15. The contractor for the installation of this portion of the Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 1 5 from Knott Avenue to Western Avenue has proposed the supply of 48" pipe in lieu of the specifie d 45" diameter pipe . This offer is made because of the -7- ( avai l ability of the 48" pipe from t h e contractor 's pipe supp lie r. The contractor, in submitting his construction schedule suggested that the job can be expedited by constructing the project from Western Avenue westerly to Orangethorpe instead of the specified laying procedure from Knott Avenue to Western Avenue. Because of the junction structure at Western Avenue, the contractor can better accommodate the traffic and expedite the work by coITlITlencing operation at the easterly end of the job. These contract revisions are off ered by the contractor at no additional cost to the District. These matters have been discussed wit h the City of Buena Park. The staff, therefo re, recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 to this contract. No. 9-ff -Ini tia l Study re Westside Force Main, Second Unit. The staff has prepared an initial study for the installation of the second unit of the Westside Force Main which extends easterly from the Seal Beach Pumping Station at Seal Beach Boulevard along Westminst er Boulevard to Rancho Street in the City of Westminster. It is contemplated that this Master Planned work will be done this summer to provide the requir ed reliability in the event of failure of the existing single force main. Pursuant to the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act, the staff is requesting authority to prepare a negative declaration for this project and that said declaration be noticed as required. Districts 5 and 6 No. 9-gg, hh & ii -Awarding Contract No. 5-8-R -Slip Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations. Pursuant to the Board's authority, the staff has prepared plans and specifications for the installation of a polyethylene insert into the force main in Pacific Coast Highway from the Rocky Point Pumping Station to the Lido Pumping Station. The Directors will recall this force main failed in January of this year and , at the present time, there is only one operating force main in this portion of the Pacific Coast Highway. To expedite the insta ll ation of the work and to avoid conflicts with the summer traffic on Pacific Co ast Hi ghway, public bids were taken on March 30th for th is work . Two bids were received with the low bid being submitted by Rodding Cl eaning Machines of Los Angeles, in the amount of $216,1 14.25. This contractor is familiar with this type of work, having performed on similar types of projects in the Los Angeles area . The staff is, ther efore , recommending the following actions as shown on your agenda: a . Approve plans and specifications prepared by staff and ratify the staff's advertising for bids. -8- ' ' b. Approve Adden da Nos. 1 a nd 2 to the contrac t which we re i ss u e d to include the r equireme nt s of the State Highway Encr oach me n t Permit. c. Award the contract to Rodd ing Cleaning Machines of Los Angele s i n the bi d amo unt of $216,114.25. (En g ineer 's e stima t e $225,000) Di stric t No. 5 No. 9-jj -Annexation No . 8 . In Nov ember, the Boa rd author iz e d initiation of proceedings fo r propo sed Annexation No. 8. This i s 1.095 acres in the vicinity adj acent to th e San Joaquin Hill s Reservoir -Tract No. 8725, Harbor Ridge. LAFCO h as app roved the annexation and it is in order that t he Board adopt Reso lut ion No. 78-74 -5 ordering the annexation . Th e proponent h as paid a ll fees. Dis trict No. 7 No . 9 -kk -Annexation No. 65. In J anuary , the Boar d authorized in itiation of a nn exation of 4 .72 acres to the Di stri ct in the vic i nity of Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan He i ghts area. LAFCO has approved the annexa tion and it is in order that the Board approve Resolution No . 78-75-7, ordering the annexat i on . No. 9-11 -An nexat i o n No. 68. The Boar d approved initiation of this annexation in November , 1977, covering .4001 acres in the vicinity of Meads Dr i ve and Morada Drive in the City of Orange . LAFCO ha s approved the annexation and adoption of Resolution No . 78-76-7 is recommended . No. 9-mm -Annexat ion No. 73. Th e Board approved initiation of this annexation in January, 197 8 , covering 10 acres in th e vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Bent Tree Lane . Adoption of Resolut i on 78 -77 -7 is r ecommended . All Di stric ts No. 1 1 -Report of the Executive Committee. Includ ed wi th the mater i a l for al l Director s is a repo r t of the Executive Comm i ttee recommending the actions appearing u nder I tem No. 1 2 . -9- District No. 5 No. 22 -Sale of Approximate l y 1000 ft. of 24-inch Ductile Iron Pipe . ( . Di s trict No. 2 is p r oceeding \vi th the permanent repair of the storm-damaged Orange Subtrunk at the Santa Ana River Cross i ng . Di strict No. 2 Directors have authorized the soliciting of bid propo sals from several contractors for the construction of a double barrel siphon across the Santa Ana Ri ver to r eplace t he Orange Subtrunk Sewer which was destroyed by storm runoff recently . .The engin eers have specified that the two-barrel s iphon be constructed usi ng 24-inch ductile iron pipe. Since the District 5 Board has author ized the staff to se ll the pipe which was previously purchased for Contract No. 5 -20A, the staff is r ecommending to Distr i ct No . 5 that a sale of the required amount of pipe (approximately 1000 ft), be made to District 2 at the current market price . The District's staff is presently making a determination as to what the price should be. This should be available by next Wednesday's Board meeting. District No. 7 No. 25 -Status Report on Monies Owed the District by Orange P ark Acres Association -Proposed Annexation No. 5 1. The District's General Counsel has prepared a report and recom- mend a t ion which is enc l osed with the agenda material as to the d is- pos ition of this matter. District No. 2 No. 28 -Proposed Annexation No. 28 (Approximately 241 Acres). Anaheim Hills, Inc ., proposes the annexation of 24 1 ac r es and has requested deferra l of payment for 53 acres of permanent open ·space that wi ll be dedicated to the County of Orange. In addition, they wish to spread the payment of current annexation acreage fees, $254,472.09, on the balance of approximate l y 1 88 acres over a 4 -year peri od. It is the staff's recommen dation that the Boards dec l are their inte nt to approve deferment of annexat i on acreage fees on the 53 acres proposed to be dedicated to the County of Orange as permanent open space and dec l are their intent to approve an agreement to pay annexation fees on the ba l ance of the property in equal annual instal- l ments over a 4 -year per i od. One-fourth before initiation of pro - ceedings and the ba l ance in three e qual annual installments with int erest at 8% on the unpaid balance . -10- ~ . No. 29 -Status Report on Repairs to the Orange Subtrunk at Santa Ana River Crossing. Pursuant to the authorization of the District 2 Board on March 20, the staff is soliciting proposals from 5 construction firms for the installation of the 24-inch double barrel siphon under the Santa Ana River at the Orange Subtrunk crossing. We expect at least four bids to be received on Monday, April 10th. Therefore, a full report on the cost will be available at Wednesday's Board meeting. No. 30 -Establishin a Time and Place for Public Hearin on Draft EIR for Car on Canyon Facilities P an. The staff is suggesting that the Board establish a time and place for a public hea ring on the Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan Draft EIR . We recommend that the hearing be held a t the Brea City Hall at some time conv enient for the Directors. The Draft EIR was discussed at l ength by the Board on October 19, 1977. If any Director has questions concerning the recommendations that the Draft EIR contains, please call Dennis Reid, Senior Engineer, of the Districts' staff, (714) 540-2910. Fred A. Harper General Manager -11- ... -____ ,, Agenda Item No. 7 c_ March 1, 1978 STAFF REPORT RE: Impact of Jarvis-Gann Initiative COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 The Jarvis-Gann tax limitation initiative which has been placed on the ballot for the June 6th election will, if passed: -Limit ad valorern property taxes to one percent (1%) of the full cash value of the property. -Require counties to levy the one-percent (1%) tax and "ap- portion it according to law to the districts (taxing agencies) within the counties." -Establish as a basis for "full cash value" the county assessor's appraised value as of March 1, 1975. (property subsequently sold or improved would be reappraised). -Limit increases in fair market value to two percent (2%) per annum. -Become effective July 1, 1978 (twenty-three days after adoption) The impact of the initiative on the Sanitation Districts can be sununarized into three basic issues: 1. Will it be necessary for the Districts to compile dual budgets for 1978-79? 2. What is the short-term financing alternative? 3. What is the long-term financing alternative? Following is a general discussion of each issue. 1. 1978-79 Dual Budgeting: Under present procedures, the official budgets of the respective Districts will not be acted upon by the Boards until the regular joint meeting on August 9th. Although consideration of the joint works budgets for maintenance and operation (JO) and con- struction (CORF) of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities usually takes place at the regular June meeting (June 14th, this year), said budgets do not, as such, levy a tax. Rather, following approval by the Joint Boards, they are incorporated into and become a line iten of the official budget of each District to be considered in August. There should, therefore, be sufficient time to consider any revisions deemed necessary to the JO and CORF budgets and to prepare and review the individual District budgets after the outcome of the election is V known. 2. Short-Term Financing Alternative: The attached schedules present a preliminary estimate of the anticipated loss of tax revenue in the event the initiative passes. Although there are several un- knowns with respect to the allocation of revenues collected under Jarvis-Gann to the various taxing agencies, the estimates are considered fairly representative. The Districts could lose between $12 and $13 million in tax revenue in 1978-79. This represents a 58% overall reduction, ranging from 43% in District No. 7 to 66% in District No. 11. It will, in all liklihood, require that the Districts develop alter- native funding sources. Pursuant to the Boards' pay-as-you-go policy, each District has been accumulating capital funds to finance the local (District) share of advanced treatment facilities required by the 1972. Federal Water Pol- lution Control Act and their respective master planned trunk sewers. However, Directors are aware that the recent amendments to the Act include provisions wherein the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may grant a waiver to·the secondary treatment requirements of the 1972 version of the Act, provided certain conditions are met. We feel that our Districts will qualify for the waiver which would then allow release of a portion of the accumulated capital re- serve funds for reallocation in 1978-79 to temporarily provide operatir~ and debt retirement funding until a permanent long-range funding alter'-1 native oould be developed and implemented. 3. Long-Term Financing Alternative: As part of the 1972 Water ' Pollution Control Act the Districts were required to develop a revenue program incorporating a user charge system. Such a system would place a tremendous administrative burden on large sewerage agencies and add substantially to the cost of operation. Because a user charge/billing system is not as cost-effective as financing based on an ad valorem tax system,·our Districts, along with large metropolitan sewerage agencies around the country convinced Congress to change the law and allow.ad valorem taxes to satisfy the use charge requirement. The staff is now proceeding to finalize our revenue program utilizing ad valorem taxes. However, while the amendments allowing ad valorem taxes were pending before Congress, the Districts were required to do a considerable amount of preliminary work on a user charge/billing system. Therefore, the groundwork for developing an alternative system has been laid and, in the event the initiative passes and it becomes necessary to implement a separate user charge/billing system to fund Districts' activities, much of the initial work has already been completed. With an intensive (and expensive) effort, implementation of an alternative billing method could be commenced within one to two years to replace the ad valorem tax system. An analysis of the initiative by the Districts' General Counsel is V included with this report. -2- COU~TV SANITATION DISTRICTS ALL DISTRICTS AVERAGED ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $21,256,752,584. Maximum Percentage Al lowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 212,567,526. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0329 District Share of Taxes $ 7,013,438. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 2,019,216. Total District Share of Taxes $ 9,032,654. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 21,428,669. Potential Loss to Districts (58%) $ 12,396,015. \..,I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,440,972,476. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 14,409,725. Districts Share of Tax Rate . 0351 District Share of Taxes $ 505,781. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85, 775. Total District Share of Taxes $ 591,556. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,382,548. Potential Loss to District (57%) $ 790,992. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 EST I MATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property Maximum Percentage Allowed Maximum Taxable Property Value Districts Share of Tax Rate District Share of Taxes Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy Total District Share of Taxes 1977-78 District Tax Levy Potential Loss to District (58%) $6,018,442,828. .01 $ 60,184,428. .0317 $ 1,907,846. $ $ 480,116. 2,387,962. 5,729,496. 3,341,534. '.,I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $7, 132,225,368. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ .]1,322,254. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0354 District Share of Taxes $ 2,524,808. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 678,615. Total District Share of Taxes $ 3,203,423. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 7,970,515. Potential Loss to District (60%) $ 4,767,092. ''.,,,/ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,700,468,484. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 17,004,685. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0341 District Share of Taxes $ 579,860. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 26,532. Total District Share of Taxes $ 606,392. 1~77-78 District Tax Levy 1,497,464. Potential Loss to District (60%) '$ 891,072. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 EST I MATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN IN I Tl ATI VE Cash Value of Property $1,214,426,020. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 12, 144,260. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0272 District Share of Taxes $ 330,324. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 31,923. '-../ Total District Share of Taxes $ 362,247. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 879,992. Potential Loss to District (59%) $ 517,745. v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $2,250, 102,072. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 2·2 ' 5 0 1 , 0 2 1 • Districts Share of Tax Rate .0291 District Share of Taxes $ 654,780. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 631, 134. Total District Share of Taxes $ 1,285,914. 19J7-78 District Tax Levy 2,238,815. Potential Loss to District (43%) $ 952,901. ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1 , 500, 11 5, 3 3 6. Maximum Percentage Allowed • 01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 15,001, 153 . Districts Share of Tax Rate . 0340 District Share of Taxes $ 510,039. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85,121. Total District Share of Taxes $ 595, 160. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,729,839. Potential Loss to District (66%) $ 1,134,679. LAW on··C£:3 OF Uou r kc & '\7oocl ru rr J4""E:~ Co. ~O\JRK£ Toi.')Ml\S L. WOOOHUf'f' SUITE 1020 CALIFORNIA F"IRST DANK OUILDING 1055 Norn H MAIN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIF'ORNIA 92701 ARCA. C:OO£ ?14 83S•6212 \...,,! ALM~ ~:.~v.-.n s Of' COUNSCL KENNARD R. SMART, .JR • ALAN R. DUHNS ... . UEMORANDUM To: General Uanager County Sanitation Districts Froru: General Counsel Date: January 27, 1978 Re: Proposed Constitutional Amendment-- Jarvis/Gann Initiative At your request, I have obtained copies of the proposed Jarvis Initiative, designed to limit ad valorem property taxes on all properties within the State of California, together with additional background information to assist you and the District in formulating a positiori as well as preparing for the eventual implementation should the Initiative be approved by the voters at the June 6, 1978, .Election. A copy of the Initiative is attached hereto for your information. While the final ·decision of the District relative to support or opposition of this Initiative is clearly one of policy to be determined by the Board, I would point out for their benefit the various defects and deficiencies from a legal point of view in order to allow them to arrive at a considered decision. My analysis is based upon not only the review of all printed materials whic~ I have had occasion to review, but also as a result of two conferences with attorneys knowledgeable on the subject. In summary, it is my opinion that the Initiative contains so many substantial legal errors and shortcomings, that its adoption ~ill cause monumental problems for all public agencies. This opinion is based upon the following analysis of the six sections of the proposed Initiative: Section l(a): A literal reading of this Secticn says the maximum amount of ad valorem tax on real property shall be 1% of the full cash value (not asseDsed value) and that the County will collect the 1%, to be apportioned to the "Districts" within the County. Quite clearly, neither the County nor the incorporated cities constitute Districts, and therefore, major interpretation will be required to construe it to cov.er those General Manager Pnec Two January 27, 1978 public agencies. Obviously, it was not the intent that only the special districts would get the tax revenue and the ci tics and counties nothing. However, it is the first example of extremely poor drafting. Secondly, there is no present law nor pending laws to allow for the implementation of this Initiative should it be approved. Specifically, if it is adopted, statutory authority will be required not only to authorize the County to collect, but most importantly, to apportion it on some pro· rata basis among the various "Districts" within the County. This is a most serious problem in view of the effective date of the Initiative b~ing July 1, following the date of approval. If passed by the voters, the ~tate will only have 24 days in which to get the program implemented. Section l(b): It is my opinion that the provisions of this Section do not authorize the District to issue new general obligation (G.O.) bonds that would incr~ase the maximum per- missible tax rate. It simply allows a continued authority to pledge the general credit and general fund of the agency but does not increase their permissible tax levy authority. Section 2(a): The effect of this Section will be to regress-the assessed valuation back to the.1975-76 levels, U and therefore, all agencies will lose the inflationary effect which has been realized during the past two ~ars. Likewise, the rate will be frozen at that point, except per Section 2(b), ~hich authorizes the maximum of 2% ~er year increase to provide for growth rate in the economy. This Section also contains per- haps the most likely provision to be declared invalid as being discriminatory. For example, two identical homes side by side wlll initially have the same tax rate. However, when a proper~y is sold? a n~~ assessncnt will attach, equal ta the sale price and the:refore the new purchaEer will in fac"t incur a tax obligation much higher than the oTiner who has not sold his property and retains the. 1975-76 assessment. Section 2(b): This Section simply provides for a per- missible increase of the taxable fair market value on an annual basis, but at a rate not to exceed 2% of the increased valuation to be added to the total cash value. In effect, if a property increases in valuation by 10%, only 2% is allowed to be added to the assessment base, therefore rninimizinG the amount of taxes that can be assessed and levied. Scct.jon J: This Section simply pertnins to State taxes and really has no significant effect upon the o~cration of local aecncics. .. General Manage1· Page Three January 27, 1978 Section 4: This Section provides that a District, "by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of such Dis- trict, may impose special taxes on such District except ad ·valorem taxes." This provision is fraught with problems, not the least of which is that a literal interpretation says two- thirds of the 11 electors 11 and not voters. Obviously, the District rarely, if ever, even has two-thirds of the electors turn out for an election, and therefore, the chances of a permissible override in taxes is virtually nonexistent. Furthermore, the language "special taxes" is also not defined in the Initiative, and absent statutory authority to impose taxes, does not appear as thouf>h this would provide any of the necessary authority needed by the District to increase its revenues. This Section does not allow an override to increase the ad valorem taxes on real property. Section 5: This Section establiahes the effective date as being the July 1 following the passage, to wit, July 1, 1978. As noted above, this would only be 24 days after the June 6th Election, and would of course have an obvious impact upon the immediately-succeeding fiscal year (1978-79). SUUMARY: At the present time, it appears as though great numbers of local· government officials and State elected officials are indicating a tentative approval and support for the Jarvis Amendment. However, I do feel that after a thorough analysis of the significant deficiencies is brought to light, that both the public and these officials will reconsider their position. Uost of them have already hedged by saying that if the State Legislature will enact a significant tax reform plan, they would not support such an Initiative measure. Perhaps this will result in a plan which gains bipartisan support·in the State Legisla- ture within the next 60 days. · · .. · · In any event, it would appear to me that the District, at this time, has no alternative but to proceed on the basis of assuming the Initiative will be passed and become la~ effective July 1, 1978. Therefore, I would urge that you implement what- ever administrative plans that you feel are appropriate, but most certainly it seems as though the 1978-79 budget for the District will have to be prepared on the basis of both having and not having the Jarvis Initiative limitations. I appreciate that this is nost difficult because while the property owners will only contribute 40% as much property tax as they have at the present time, there is yet no indication as to ho~ that revenue General Uanager Page Four January 27, 1978 will be allocated to the respective agencies. I think it is fair to aoaume that the CountieD and Cities will receive the lion's share in view or their havinc to ncccssririly perform certain health nnd safety functions, such as police and .fire protection, .. hoapital care, etc. With that in mind, ii would appear that the Diotrict should probably consider user charges among its revenue sourcca. .. . 1'hornas 10:!±~· General Counsel TVN: pj .... · -i .i -... :.• ·\wl . ~· Cal-Tax analysis of the Jarvis initiative: 11 key qu~stions for Califo~nia taxpayers With the apparent qualification of the Jarvis/Gann property tax initiative for the June 1978 statewide b<1llot. C.llifornia voters will be given their four th ch.mce in 10 years to constitutiorrnlly limit prop· erty taxes. The initiative, which qarnered a reported 1 million signatures by the December 2 deadline. proposes to: o limit ad valo1 em property taxes to one percent ( 1 °'ol of the full cash value of the property. o Require counties to levy the one-per· cent (1%) tax and "apportion it accordinq to law to the districts within the counties." oEstablish as a basis for "full cash value" the county assessor's appraised value as of March 1, 1975 {property subsequently sold or improved would be reappraised). o Limit increases in fair market value to two percent (2%) per annum. •Require an affirmative vote of two· thirds (2/3) of the "qualified electors" of any respective taxing en!ity to raise city. county or special district taxes. Basic questions posed by· the Jarvis/ Gann initiative are examined by Cal·Tax in the following analysis: •What would the replacement revenues be? According to the Legislative Analyst, Jarvis/Gann would cut local property tax revenues by 57 billion to SS bil!ion. In addition, there would he a related un· knowri loss of federal revenue·sharing funds. Since the proposal is silem on re· placement revenues. possible sources from which the difference could be made up is a question open to speculation. However, the magnitude of replace· ment revenues can be estimated in terms of increases which would he nf!ecled in any one of the other three major Cali· fornia tax sources. For example. a dou· bling of the sales tax rate ·-to 12.251 :. - would raise an estrmatecl 57.5 hill1on. A 150% surcharge on the present income tax could raise the needecl reJ>lac:ement revenue; or. the p1esent 50" .. business inventory tax exemption coulcl he elimi· nated and the bank anrl corporation tax rate could be incrnased from 9.,o to 44''. •. two moves which. toqe1her, could raise $7 .5 billion. It also would aprw;rr that the 1" .. limit on full cash v.ilue is 1 eally lt?ss th,m une percent, reQuirrng even mort? rnpl,1ce· ment revenues. S111r.e the Iii 'ii yt•a1 v.thic of propelty is as of M,11ch 1. 1975. the re.ii limit would ht• <thn11t 7 10rho; of 1'',. on the cffrct1vc cl.ire• of llw .111w111lnwnt (July 1, 1978). In lht! lut1111!, the litmt woulcl h1•co1111? ev1·n 11qhl1!1, hec.111~c 1hc proposal stipulillt!~ th,11 v,11111•-; coulcl not uu:rnasr. hy morn th,111 2".. 1mr ye;u (excrpt fot nt?wly puu:hJsc<I ui newly constructed propmtyl. Depending upon ;ictual ma1 ket vJlue QI owth, it is concc1v· Jhh• lhdt the effective limit in 10 years r.oulcl uc as low as 1:3rd of l"o of market values. 1f such values were to be c.JcrivecJ, as they are now. from the marketplace. Since the proposal defines full cash value as 1he "county assessor's valuation" a11tl does not mention state assessees, it leaves unanswe1ed the question as to whether state assessees fall within the 1% limit. If state assessees are outside the limit, a major increase in tax liability could fall on these taxpayers, whose propertv held a 1976· 77 assessed value of S5.6 billion, or about 6% of the total sta~e-local assessroicnt roll. eWhich taxpayers will benefit? Previous tax limit initiatives have been viewed as faulty mechanisms for distri· bution of tax savings. Assuming that the major purpose of suth limitations is home· owner property tax relief, it should be noted that an across·the·board limit provides most of its benefits to owners of business or income-producing property. This effect was not fully understood until the first Watson initiative campaign in 1968, where it was determined that since 65°{, of the property tax was paid by business. an scross·the·uoard approach also gave 65% of the relief to business. Since the Jarvis/Gann proposal. unlike the homeowners' exemption, is an untar· getetl approach. nearly S5 billion in S7 .5 billion first·ye<ir property tax savings would go to non·homeowners. Of course, the business tax "windfall". if any. could not he determined until after replacement 1evenues were selected. Another feature of JarvisiGann which seems to unintentionally discriminate against homeowners is the provision requiring the reappraisal of property at the time of sale. Some major industrial plants may never be sold, thus canying their 1975 assessments (plus 2% increase per year) indefinitely. Since a single· family home is sold, on the average. once eve1y seven years. p1operty sales would more heavily affect residential valuation. There is also the question of equal tax treatment of similarly situated home· owne1s. HomPowners 111 identical market value houses. next doo1 to one another. couid pav suhs1ant1<illy diffenmt prop- c1 ty tJxe'\ 101 the same yovernment ser· vices simply bt?C:Juse one house hacl not been sold and the other hJd. F ot cx.11nJ'llP.. <issurne two nr.i~1hboring $40,000 m,u !..ct value hnrnes, and project J :?".,compounded annu..tl inc:re,rse. In five Yt!ilrS, 1•ai:h house wouhl ~li1ve a c:onstitu· t1011ally tldmed market valut• of S44, 161. At the hcqinni11q of thr. sixlh year. one hcJU~t' sold for SG4.000, which rs a rather llHttlt!sl, l" .. pc1 munrh rcllection of v.1lu.111on incrt~;iws. 111 tht• California hm1<.11111 '"•'' t..1·1.· It 1s. n11v1?r t1wl1·s~. J Go<>;, gr ow th 11\ v.rlu,1tron ov1•1 the f1Vt!·ye:ir pm 1ml. S111n• rt 1!> not Ct!1 l,1111 how lhr. limit works with respect to the home· owner exemption, simply assume that the full market value is taxable at l~u. This would mf.'an that one homeowner would pay a J>roperty tax bill of S441.61 and the owner of the newly repurchased ancl revalued house would pay a property tax bill of 5640.00. 45% higher than the identical house next door. Estimation of total homeowner bene· fits under Jarvis/Gann is impossible, because property tax savings have to be netted against higher fecJeral and state income taxes (due to loss of ~>roperty tax deductions,, and replacement revenues calling for higher income and sales tax rates would be subject to later legislation. As for renters, while residential rentals are within the limit. the savings would go to landlords. and any pass·on of property tax savings to renters would have to be a subject for a subsequent statute. Of course, renters could also pay higher income and sales taxes to replace lost property tax revenues. o What local public service cuts will be made? As with past initiative proposals, the Jarvis/Gann amendment offers more than replacement revenue problems; much of the shortfall would have to be made up in cuts in present levels of public service. Given the cost impact of the propo:oed limit, cuts would undoubtedly have to be made into basic local services. How and where would such decisions be made? What would be cut? The proposal also raises a number of other questions regarding the definition and intent of VJrious of its provisions. A few of those questions: oHow wm the limited property tax revenues be distributed? Section 1 (a) of the amendment requires that the 1% tax will be" ... col· lected by the counties and apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties." What will be the basis for the counties' distribution of the sharply limited property tax revenues? Does distribution to the "districts" mean that cities and counties are excluded from any property tax revenues? •Would the amendment effectively prohibit any future general obliga- tion bond issues? Major prohlems seem to confront any future general ohliqa!ion bond financing. A two·thircJs vole of thc qu,·1/tfied electors is required to impose special taxes within a disrrict, but, apparently, no new ad valorem taxes can be raised. even if approved by a two-thirds vote of the people. If gPneral ohlig;r1ion bonds are in some way still ;ill owed under the· amend· ment, the two-thirds requirement would seem to be an impossible hurdle. If, for example, 55n;, of all registered voters turned out. all voting "yes"' on a bond issut'. 1t coulll \1111 rin 1tnwn to d1•l1• fa1l1111J tu meet ttw 11•qu111•1111•nt .. t two·thlllh ot Jll 1cy1~tc1cli VUIC•~ ··P~H JVC it. Further, since the proposal excludes from the limit prior votrcJ <ipproved general obligation hon<I levies. it may be assumed that future votcr·apµrovcu levies would be witl~in the limit. •Would the amendment substan· tially increase personal property taxes? The amrndmcnt only applies to rc.11 property. Does this mp,m that pc1'ional property, presently valued at S 14 billion statewide. would br subject to incrc<iscs to partly recover lost real prop.?1 ty tax revenues due to the limit? Would th1! 50°-o inventory tax exemption also be eliminated? •Would the amendment provide a tax loophole for "new construc- tion?" Section 2 provides for reassessments of "newly constructed" p1 operty. a term which is not defined. Would a multi· million-dollar addition to an existing plant be "nc•11 construction" or an addition? If only an addition. it could present a loophole whereby billions in new construction could escape taxation entirely. o Will the timber tax be felled by the amendment? Jarvis/Gann would require the use of 1975-76 values. The value of timberlands -rea~ property -(located in about 25 California counties} was included in the value.of standing timber in 1975-76. As a result of a recent change in statute and the constitution, timh"'r was removed from the property tax and is now subject to a yield tax at the time of harvest. Under Jarvis/Gann. timber owners would pay future property taxes on the basis of rnn, 76 v.1lucs. which 111t:l111h!tl t11nher v.1•m·~. ~;111cc tlw yichl tJx ,., not 1t!J>c,1lcd, llr1• 11111ln·r uw111•1<, t.u.c 1hc p111·.pc\..l of douhle taxation. o Could Jarvis/Gann cause over- assessments of properties? In qornq to 1975 76 assessments. the undc•rlying assumptrcn is that they will be lower, anc1 91merally this is true. However. there are m.my properties that have declined in · value since 1975· 76, for a vaa 11ity of rnJsom, and the only way these asse~smr.nts could be red11ced in the future would UI! throuqtl d decline of the cono;umcr price index hclow an 3nnual increase of 2°1> -· a very unlikely event. oDocs the 1% limit apply to the total value of a home or to the value that remains after the home· owners' exemption? Detcrmin<.1tion of this question could make a significant differen~e in tax bur· den. particularly for a modest home. For example, on a $15,000 home, a 1% prop· erty tax would yir.ld a maximum of SiS0.00. If. however, the tax were based only on the sa.ooo remaining after the $7,000 horw!owners' exemption is applied, the maximum tax would be $80.00. If the limit applies to the total value rather than the residual value after the homeowners exemption. Jarvis/Gann could make little difference in the prop· erty tax burdens of low-valued homes and could significantl•t increase other taxes needed for replacement revenues. Assume the same S 15,000 market value home in an S 11.50 tax rate area. The tax on this home, after the exemp· tion. at present would. be 5230, SBO higher than the 1%-of-market-value approach. Would S80 savings cover the increased sales, income, and user taxes and fees that would be needed to replace lost revenues? Would it also cover in· creased insurance costs due to cutbacks in That Articlo XIII A is added to the Constitution to road: Section 1. pulir.1 ·r.. 41mJ otlwr hunit!·P•otcct•on l>C1v1c.. JI courst?, ii tht? hu:iw haJ a s11ll l•>W1~1 11Jl1Jc. tht~ll rnul'.I ht• 11·.l savings under Jarvis/Gann and thi?re could hr. an ar:tual 1>roperty tal( increa\e, in aJc.htion to other non-prupert'/ tdx increases. •Is a limit of 1% of market value realistic and equitable in its appli- cation to the variety of fiscal con· ditions that prevail in California taxing jurisdictions? In Los Angeles County. for example. the spread betwe~n the hiqhl?Sl and the lowest composite tc;x rate is S 13.93. from $21.62 to S7 .69, for a difference of from 5.4"\, to 1.9":, of market value, assuming a uniform 25% assessment rilt•o. Tax rates arc high in some districts for a number of reasons. including poor planning; bad public-spending habits. the desire of the local taxpayers to assume short· and long-term spending obli· gations, low assessed valuation, inade· quate water supp!y, high fire danger, overlapping special districts, high cost public utility services and facilities, etc. In short, there are myriad reJsons for high tax rates. Should it be assumed that the people who continue to live in these high tax areas no longer wio;h to pay thesP. rat'?S and either want service cu•~. other taxes. or help from other taxpayers? Is it realistic to assume that a 521.62 rate can be cut to 54.00 (equi'Jalent to 1 % of rna~ket)? What happens to the ccsts of services that can't be cut? Who pays them? Should the taxpayers in the low tax rate area assume some of these costs? Some of the low tax rate areas ha11e bene· fitted from high ass~med values. but others are low because taxpayers have consister.tly re.>isted higher spending p.rograms. Should thesa taxpa'r'!rs n'>W assume the burdens of those who are willing to pay the price of a lifestyle that carries high governmental costs? (a) Tho m 1.1:.<imum amount of any ad valorem tnx on real property shalt not el(cecd One percont ( 1 % I of the full c:ish value of such property. Tho one percent ( 1°1.,) tax to bo collected by tho counties and app<>rtioned according to law to the districts within the counties. (b) Tho limitation provided for in subdivision {al sh:ill not apply to ad \'alorom taxes or special auossments to pay the interost and redemption charges on any tndol.itedness approved by the voters prior to the time this section becomes effective. Section 2. (1) Tho full c:i:;h value means thr. Ccur,ty Assessors valuation of roill propen•1 ;is shown on the 1975-76 till( bill under "full cash value", or theroafter, the 11pprais11d V;\luo of real property whun p:.irchased, nowl•t constructed, or a ch:iu9e in ownership has or.cured 11her tho 1975 assessment. All real property not already asse-.~P.d up te> the 1975-76 tax lt:vel~ may be reaHossecl to refloct that valuation. (b) Tho Fair market value has<' :u:iv reficct from year to vear thot inflationary rate not to exceed two percent (2%) for any given year or reduction as shown in the conwmer price ind<:.<,.,, comparable data for tho aroa under taxmg juri~iction. Section 3. From and after tho affective d-.te of this article, any ch:inqes in State taxes enacted for the purpose of increasing revenues collected pursuant thereto whrther '>Y increased t3tes or cha1l?OS in mcthoar, of comsmtatron must be imposed by an Act p3S'iod by not less than two-thirds of all members elected to each of tho two house!' of tho Le91siaturo, uxcePt that no now ad vatorem ,axes on real property, or sales or transaction taxes on the sales of real property mav bo imposP.d. Section 4. Cities, Countres and special districts, by a two·thirds vote of the qualified 11lectors of such district, may impose special taxes on such district, except ad v;i•<'rnm tues on reJI property or a transaction tax or sales tax on the sale of roal property within such Ciw. County or special district. s~tion ~i. This article sh:ill take effect for th1, tax year beginning on July 1 following the passage of this Am!lndment, e>ec9pt Section 3 which shall become effective u~on tho: riassa~e of this article. Section 6. If any 1<lr.tion, port, clau~o. or phrase hereof is for any roasnn held to bo invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining sections shalt not bo affected but will remain in full forc.i and eifoct. P'lnfcrl hy Thn C.1l1lornl11l4•ri;,vcr~· A~~ociation C.)=11 11t:h !°:•••••"' '~•••''' lh>O ~~"' t.'t1Thrnto L.thforruu 9'>Hl4 .. . ....- Agenda Item No. 2 2--. April 12, 1978 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: District No. 5 Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.S ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 540-2910 (71.C) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Sale of 24" Ductile Cast Iron Pipe to District No. 2 In July, 1976 the District awarded a contract (Job No. 5-20-A) for the purchase of approximately 10,000 feet of pipe for proposed Back Bay Trunk Sewer. Delivery of the pipe was withheld pending issuance of a Coastal Commission Permit. The pipe was delivered and stored at Plant No. 1 in April, 1977. This pipe was purchased at a competitive bid price of $22.46 per foot, including tax and delivery to Plant No. l~ After the Coastal Commission denied the issuance of a permit to the District to construct the proposed Back Bay Trunk Sewer, the Directors, at the October 12, 1977 Board Meeting, instructed the staff to advertise for sale of pipe purchased for the best price. The Orange Subtrunk in District No. 2 recently experienced a failure which required the installation of a temporary pipe to restore the wastewaters to the sewer system and the installation of a deeper two barrel siphon to replace the temporary sewer and provide for future capacities. The permanent sewer siphon requires the installation of 1,000-feet of 24-inch cast iron pipe. Because of the·need to complete this installation as soon as possible, the staff is recommending that District No. 5 sell to Di·strict No. 2 the required 24-inch cast iron pipe for District No. 2 sewer installation. In soliciting the bids for the construction, the staff requested the five bidders to submit the furnished cost of the pipe in lieu of the District furnishing the 24-inch cast iron pipe. The quotations received from the contractors are as follows: John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. s. s. Zarubica Kordick & Associates George Miller Construction Company Bebek Co. $26.00/1.f. 22.44/1.f. + tax 26.14/1.f. 26.14/1.f. 26.14/1.f. Staff has analyzed the bids and feels that the quotation received from S. s. Zarubica is not based upon.a quotation from the pipe company and that District No. 5 should establish a fair market price of $26.00/l.f. and recommend that the required footage be sold to District No. 2 at that unit price. z5· Agenda Item No. =- Ll\W c·rr1cc~ er 'W · -'-' .. •· k r~ nn:1'1Kt .. ,,,_,.,"_ I W~OUtUJfl "-c."'u t• W/oT'f 0\ C't.~tr CJHf"'" t U•to:T n1.t1t< fH.Ul f)I"~ 117P!.9' N~1>'Y1t "°'°'''" ~-. tfCC:T :..F.l.,lA ""'"·· <.".t.Ltr~ntl!I-. ?:'1C."' ME MO Rf, !_{ll_U M lo: Bcrnrd of Di.rec::to1·~ County Snnitntion Di~,trict Uo .. 7 From! General Counsel Oatc; A~'ri112.1978 R~; Oranae Park Acre~ \." ..:~Jtc~LL Krt2;..4on n ~.t..•A.nT •. 1n. As i n d i c 11 t e d i n my St il f ! R c po r l · i n c 1 u de d w i t. h the Agenda m~terials~ I was to confer with Mr. G~orge Rach· of the Or a n g e Pa r l~ Acres l\ s soc i a ti on pr i or to t he 8 u '1 r·d .nicet ing.& I· hu\'e this mnr.niHg discu:.;r.r:-d t.hc outsta:1d iuy indcL>tc:dn~s~ with Mr. Roch. one he h;n= proposed t.nc folle>Hinu: 1. lhat he· \>ii1l appeilr at the: Boa·i .. d i·~eeting this !? v e n i n g to ~ >~ p res r. h n t h t i; c g r a t i t tu1 f' f:) n d a pp rt: c i ~ l i o 11 o f the · As ~ o c ·; a l i on to l h 2 o i ~ t t" 1 t L 2 • Th d t he w i t 1 t e n d e l. a elm c: k i ri th f' ;~ r.10 u n t o f $Z,50fJ.00 from t.he As!: .. oc·iation ('5 rarti<I puyment 'of the ouLStdnding obligation.· .3 • Th a t. t h c f-\ s 5 o c 1 a t i o n '" i1 l r c n:i t t he s um Q f $ 1 t 2 5 0 • 0 0 on · o ,.. be f o re ~1 u 1 y l , l 9 7 9 • 4 • Th a t. t. h c Ass o t i -a t i n n w il ·1 r~ m i t the ~ um o f S l , 2 5 0 ~ 0 0 on or before July l !I 1980. J ·indicat.ed tc:> Mr. Hitch th<;t I was i;crtdin thut the Hoard w o u l d b e rn o s t h ~ p p y t o rec c 1 v e t he t. e n d e r Cd p ~ y 1:1 t ;; l ~ bu t th~ t I coul <l !nakt: fl(l commitr.H:11l L1S to the Hoilrd If. wi 11 •i nnne~s· t o a c. r. P. p t t h e o t h ~ r l> ii 1 a n c e o n a t. i me -p t? y b c s i s . ! n 1 z o did not ~dvise Mr. RDch of th~ $pPcific detail~ proµused by th c S t a ff t o i mp{.! ~ e o f s p E' c i a 1 1 ~ n d u :.c.. p 1 " n n i n <1 t e i.:: i 11 add i t. i on t C> t It c r c-9u1 a r J n n e :.:r:: t. ion c h ,l rg es • 1 d i d ,1 d v i 5 c him th~t the St~ff hcsd made a qcncr~!l recOr:irnendiition of i 111 po !; i n g iH1 a rl d i t i o n a l f e c , a n d Hr • R ii c h i u <l i t <ti-c d t h i1 t h e Board of. Directors County S~n1tation District Ho. 7 P~Qe Two April 12, 1978 dfd not think th~t would be particularly well received by the re.s i dents. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Pleasure of the Board. /j . /L . . TLW; pj ~c: Mr. F.A. ~arper Mr. J~W. Sylvester " IR" < / 1'?'1 -.9. ~f ~Mr;d cf 2{ f-;V'.rV//' /1homar. l. Woodruff General Counsel Agenda lti!m No.~ q ,La..) April 12, 1978 ST AF F REPORT TO: District No. 2 Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Status Report of Repair and Replacement of the Orange Subtrunk -Santa Ana River Crossing Subsequent to the Special Board Meeting of March 30th, the staff has directed the contractor to install additional pro- tective rip rap on the temporary sewer, reviewed all costs with the Federal Disaster System Administration, completed the plans and specifications for the installation of the permanent sewer siphon, solicited and received bids for the construction thereof. Although all of the costs have not been completed at this time on the temporary repair work, the total cost is estimated to be approximately $131,500, itemized as follows: John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. Lowry and Associates . Butier Engineering, Inc. Subtotal District's force account, including emergency chlorination facilities Total Less estimated reimbursement from Federal Disaster Assistance Administration · Net estimated District's expense $110,000 2,500 4,500 $117,000 · -i-4·,soo $131,500 111,000 .$ 20, 000 Pursuant to the Board's authorization, competitive proposals were received from five responsible cont.ractors which ranged from a low of $276,100 to a high of $295,650. John Artukovich & Sons, Inc., the contractor employed for the temporary work, submitted the lowest quotation in the amount of $276,100. The contract was awarded on April 11, 1978. The contractor has submitted a construction schedule which indicates commencing work on April 18th, with work being completed on or about May 18th. The cost for the permanent installation is estimated as follows: District No. 2 Directors April 12, 1978 Page Two Construction Engineering Inspection and Supervision Subtotal Less reimbursement from Federal Disaster Assistance Administration Total $276,100 7,500 .... ·4·,200 $287,800 · · ·1·2·0·,·soo $167,000 Considering the District would be faced with the adding of additional facilities in the future to accommodate the Master Plan flows, the net cost to the District is considerably less than if the failure had not occurred thereby allowing assistance from the Federal Disaster Fund. The Environmental Management Agency has· issued the permit for the installation and the Corps of Engineers has indicated their cooperation in ceasing to discharge· impounded waters from Prado Dam on or about April 20th·. REL:hjb i_ ~ -·;:'ii· "-· ij ~ ii--···' RESOLUTIONS· ·AND SUPPORTING··DOCUMENTS APRIL 12 .. ··1978 .. ~ 7':"30··p·,M. WARRANT NQ. JOINT OISTRICTS Cl.AIMS PAID MARCii 14, 1978 JOINT OPEIMTING FUND WARRANTS 40908 40909 .....,; 40910 40911 40912 40913 40914 40915 40916 40917 40918 40919 40920 40921 40922 40923 40924 40925 40926 40927 40928 40929 40930 40931 40932 40933 40934 \.,,/ 40935 40936 40937 40938 40939 . 40940 40941 40942 40943 40944 40945 40946 40947 40948 40949 40950 40951 40952 40953 40954 40955 40956 40957 40958 40959 '.,I 40960 40961 40962 40963 II A-1" Allied Colloids, Poly Chemicals Aljac Supply Comp:my, Small Hardware American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Society For Testing, Nater Testing Manual American Standard, Gaskets Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Line Repairs The Anchor Packing Company, Compressor Parts Andrews Hardware & Metal Company, Cam Chain Void Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Barksdale Controls Division, Pump Parts BC Industrial Supply, Rope Benz Engineering, Inc., Air Compressor Blue Diamond Materials, Patch Hix W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage C & R Reconditioning Company, Rebuild Cam Shaft CS Company, Valves Clark Dye Hardware, Small Tools Coast Marine Tank, Dip Tank Coit Drapery Service, Drapery Cleaning College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber William Collins Mobile Home, Relocate Inspection Trailer Compressor Products, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Controlco, Valves Cook Drafting Supply, Drafting Supplies Cooper Energy Services, Engine Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Costa Hesa Datsun, Truck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water C. R. Davis Supply Company, Steam Cleaner Deco, Electrical Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Company, Drilling Nick DiBenedetto, Travel Expense Double F Supply Company, Small Hardware Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies James R. Fatland, Seminar Registration Fischer & Porter Company, Flow Meters Fisher Scientific Company, Pump Parts Clifford A. Forkert, Aerial Photos City of Fountain Valley, Water Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies Frost Engineering Service Company, Operating Supplies Frye Sign Company, Signs General Telephone Company, Phone Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldcnwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts Hertz Car Leasing Oivision, Car Lease I sco Compnny c/o lloffmnn Company, .Freight Charge Hollywood Tire Of Orange, Tires Hotel Durant, AMSA Meeting Expense AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 20,280.00 300.47 278.91 37.88 65.37 3,383.30 116. 23 137.85 .oo 459.60 490.21 302.74 1,169.47 . 11.85 . 19.95 580.00 170.91 74.17 90.10 96.00 68.16 275~00 515.84 465.09 1,457.28 788.31 59.09 125.74 383.72 6.00 17.82 1,,483.00 46.00 120.57 110.88 150.00 208.78 108.44 726.01 100.00 4,001.59 94.37 700.00 443.30 175.24 227.29 47.70 3,470.20 69.06 4,352.41 48.16 21.35 819.23 10.19 231.54 152 .15 "A-1" • JOINT lllSTIUCTS CLAIMS PAID MAUCH 14, 1978 ·WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 40964 40965 40966 40967 40968 40969 40970 40971 40972 40973 40974 40975 40976 40977 40978 --40979 40980 40981. 40982 40983 40984 40985 40986 40987 40988 40989 40990 40991 40992 40993 40994 40995 40996 40997 40998 40999 41000 41001 41002 41003 41004 41005 41006 41007 41008 41009 41010 41011 41012 41013 41014 41015 41016 41017 41018 41019 "A-2" llouse of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water ICN Life Sciences Group, Water Sampling Inland Empire Equipment Company, Service M~nual International Business Machine, Typewriter Elements Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Bryon ,Jackson Pump Division, Pump Parts Jims Mobile Home Transport, Door Adjustment Kaman Bearing & Supply, Couplings Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Welding Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings Kingmann-White, Inc., Office Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Rental· Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts Larry's Building Materials,· Inc., Small Hardware Leonards Carpet Service,. Carpet Installation Lewco Electric Company, Starter Repair Ray E. Lewis, Travel Expense Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, First Aid Supplies Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lighting Livingston-Graham, Concrete Mix McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Rope Mar Vac Electronics, Electrical Supplies Metropolitan Supply Company, Thermometer Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Truck Manuals Paul A. Mitchell, Employee Mileage and Travel Expense E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers National Sanitary Supply, Paper Supplies Newark Electronics, Tubing City of Newport Beach, Water Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Lumber Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp Oxygen Service, Dernurrage Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M.C. Patten Corporation, Vacuum Gauge Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies Pickwick Paper Products, Bin Boxes Postmaster, Postage Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Productool, Inc., Tool Box Riinbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Randle & West, Electrical Repair Ratcliff Company, Inc., Chain Hoist The Register, Employment Ads Robbins & Meyers, Pump Parts Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Shepherd Machinery Company, Engine Repairs Sheraton-Palace Hotel, West Coast Uischargc Meeting Sherwin Wi 1 liams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies John Sinlcr, Employee Mileage Southern Cali fornfo Edison, Power AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $. AMOUNT· 931.10 385.79\_.j 935.88 20.00 13.86 34.34 2.75 484.95 85.00 94.66 257.16 801.61 64.36 134.32 1,056.44 1,,194.82 28.14 135.95 225.60 59.37 66.35 248.43 341.77 173.15 67.20 98.51 41.02v 44.35 63.52 755.57 303.05 24.85 4.00 183.59 5.80 213.70 46.92 1,,016.31 71.04 187.34 122.96 500.00 15.90 27.77 83.70 2,,257.00 721.99 233.49 129.65 543.43 938.58 2, 812 .46 '..) so.oo 487.23 28.98 39' 112. 43 "A-2" WARRANT NO. JOINT DI~TRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 14, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ··: .• 41020 41021 .· ~-41022 41023 41024 41025 41026 41027 41028 41029 41030 41031 41032' -41033 41034 41035 . :·41036 ·41037 41038 41039 . 41040 41041 41042 . 41043 . •A-3" South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings Southern Counties Oil Company, Fuel Stang Hydronics, Inc., Pump~ Starow Steel, Aluminum J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Taylor-Dunn, Truck Parts C.O. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene Travel Buffs, Air Fare Trexler Compressor, Inc., Gaskets Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts United Parcel Service, UPS Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings · Valve & Primer Corporation, Valve VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies John R. Waples, Odor Control · Water Pollution Control Federation, Conference Registration Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Gaskets Western Analytical, Lab Service Void Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, CASA Meeting Expense · James Wybenga, Employee Mileage TarAL JOINT OPERATING ~GB~DA ITEr·1 #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 6.30 3,139.73 7,573.11 669.73 516.55 205.53 100.91 644.00 33.11 817.30 25.09 8.86 25·.20 . 1,490.53 224.65 1,158.00 213.00 50.00 109.73 50.00 .oo 316.14 58.90 5.40 $ 126,560.43 "A-3" -· JO INT DI STRlCTS CI.A I~ t~; PA rI> HJ\Rr.11 1 ·1, 1 !l78 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUN'l' 40889 40890 40891 40892 40893 40894 40895 40896 40897 40898 40899 Basic Systems, Oigital Multimeter $ 1,610.72 7 ,471.67 423.03 360. 40 1,007.75 "A-4" Buticr Engineering, Inc., Contract Management P2-23-l, 3, 5 & 6 · Cole-Parmer Instruments, Di!~i tal ·Strobe Contacts Influential, Business Index Cook Drafting & Supply, Plan Holders Designed Facilities Leasing Company, Trailer Rental J-6-1 Donovan Construction Company, Release Pl-16 Gold Key Warehouse Showrooms, Office Furniture Skipper & Company, Release PW-055-1 Truck & Auto Supply Company, Spring Tester Twinning Laboratories, Testing P2-23-3 TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL. DISTRICTS 51.00 1,431. 38 160.27 1,229.25 275.60 22.50 $ 14 ,043. 57 $140' 604. 00 "A-4" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID MARCH 14, 1978 \,,,,/ .. ·WARRANT NO. •DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OtrrLAY IN FAVOR OF 40900 Clifford Forkert, Legal Description TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 40901. 40902 Ameron Corporation, Use Charge Refund Southwest Regional Laboratory, Use Charge Refund TOTAL .DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY · IN FAVOR OF $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 214.50 214.50 AMOUNT 150.00 99.00 249.00 AMOUNT 40903. Boyle Engineering Corporation, Design Engineering ·3-22-1· ·$ 4,202. 78. TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING IN FAVOR OF 40904 City of Anaheim, Connection Fee Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 "B-1" .AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ 4,202.78 -AMOUNT $ 1,073.50 $ 1,073.50 $ S,525.28 "B-1" lNUlVlUUAL IHSTRlCT CLAl:l!.i l'Alll :.t\l~Cll l•t, 197H WARRANT NO. . DISTRICT NO. S ACCU~RJLJ\TEO CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 40905 ECOS Management Criteria, EIR, Jamboree TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 40906 40907. "B-2" State of California, Annex 64 Processing Fee Litronics Industries, Use Charge Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 AGENDA ITFM #8 -ALL. DISTRJ CTS AMOUNT $ 1,595.31 $ 1,595.31 $ $ AMOUNT 95.00 896.00 991.00 "B-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 ·WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41072 41073 I..._/ 41074 41075 41076 41077 41078 41079 41080 41081 41082 41083 41084 41085 41086 41087 41088 41089 41090 41091 41092 41093 41094 41095 41096 41097 41098 y 41099 41100 41101 41102 41103 41104 41105 41106 . 41107 41108 41109 41110 41111 41112 41113 41114 41115 41116 41117 41118 41119 41120 41121 41122 41123 '-"'41124 41125 41126 41127 41128 II C-l" A & B Reflectorizing, Reflectors Air California, Airfare, Various Meetings Alhambra Foundry Co. Ltd., Traffic Gate · Allied Colloids, Polymer American Chemical Society, Science Manual American Lock & Supply, Inc., Padlocks The Anchor Packing Company, Boat Anchor Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Catalog Associated of Los Anglees, Electrical Supplies Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repairs Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings John G. Bell Company, Air Cylinder Repair Bird Machine, Gear Box Repairs Bird X, Inc., Bird Repellers C & R Reconditioning Company, Camshaft Repair CS Company, Valve Gasket California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair CASA, Conference Registration Fee California Lithograph Corporation, Maps· Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Vacuum s·ervice Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline and Oil Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Premium Coast Nut & Bolt, Small Hardware College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Contro~ Specialists, Inc., Pump Parts F. B. Cook Corporation, Emergency Sewer Repair Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Batteries County Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water DME, Inc., Freight Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies . El Power Corporation, Reimbursement of Qtrly. Use Chg. O'Pymt. Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Federal Envelope Company, Stationery Fisher Controls Company, Pump Parts Flo-Systems, Pump Parts Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies and Processing City of Fullerton, Water General Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies Georgia Pacific, Chlorine General Telephone Company, Phone Golden State_Fish Hat~he~y, Lab Research Specimens Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Harbor Radiator, Truck Repair Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Compressor Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Pump Parts Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Chain Saw Rental In-Phase Electronics, Electrical International Business Machine, Typewriter Element King Bearing, Inc., Compressor Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Tissue Paper Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools Kramer Welding, Welding AGENDA ITEM #8 -AL.L DISTRICTS AMOUNT ~ 90.26 236.70 189.21 6,240.00 52.00 307.40 388.83 33.20 776.53 233.34 254~13 161.96 64.42 3,106.09 1,083.17 225~00 20.86 137.58 200.00 713. 38 483.54 3,445.84 90.00 43.09 719. 25 69.44 1,665.47 54.97 1,757.33 123.24 248.04 46.00 10.29 1,095.82 100.00 3,000.00 91.82 564.66 42.40 110. 32 13.32 136.74 3,154.98 3,038.38 13.50 7,273.75 16.50 1,459.88 204. 28 701. 53 153.08 21.97 17.17 176.25 198.75 61.61 2,000.00 II C-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 28, 1978 I !VARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41129 41130 41131 41132 41133 41134 41135 41136 41137 41138 41139 41140 41141 41142 41143 41144 41145 41146 41147 41148 41149 41150 41151 41152 41153 41154 41155 41156 41157 41158 41159 41160 41161 41162 41163 41164 41165 41166 41167 41168 41169 41170 . 41171 41172 41173 41174 41175 41176 41177 41178 41179 41180 41181 41182 41.183 41184 II C-2" LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Rental Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, Rainsuits Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers Nasco, Water Sampler NB Products, Pipe Stopper National Chemsearch, Spray Lube National Lumber Supply, Hardware and Paint Supplies Newark. Electronics, Electrical Suppl~es City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Paper Orange County Acoustics, Remodeling Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamps Orange Paper Products, Inc., Shipping Bags Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Pipe Fittings Oxygen Service, Demurrage Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Pak West, Cleaning Supplies Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M. C. Patten Corporation, Pressure Gauge Pickwick Paper Products, ~aper Supplies Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Programmable Electric Calculators, Calculator Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Reynolds Alumintnn Supply Company, Aluminum Richey Electronics, Inc.,:Electrical Supplies Robbins & Myers, Rotor Santa Ana Electric Motors, Transformer Repair Sargent Welch Scientific.Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Skil Corporation, Replace warrant Small Business Report, Business Magazine Subscription So. Coast Air Quality Maintenance Dist., Operating Permit Southern California Edison Company, Power South Orange Supply, Piping Southern California Gas Company, Gas Southern Counties Oil Company, Diesel Fuel Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water State Compensation Insurance Fund, Comp. Insurance The Suppliers, Small Hardware Taylor Instruments, Lab Supplies Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline US Glass, Vehicle Repair United Parcel Service, UPS Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Chemical Gas Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Valvatc Associates, Valve Coil VWR Scientific, Plastic Apron ~farrcn ~fcVeigh. & Griffin, Research Management Study Water Sewage Works, Tech. Manual AGrNDA ITFM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $· 211.02 1,999.46 4.51 212.42 120 .. 72 425.96 34.00 440.00 121. 90 179.62 165 .19 11.17 104 .13 414.72 83.28 101.37 78·. 79 420.33 261. 70 138.88 742.00 274.35 277.72 31.80 107 •. 27 158 •. 95 29.10 195.91 80.90 1,255.50 2,899. 57· 421.61 1,252.86 31.67 192.37 48.00 15.00 53,346.01 6.25 4,073.21 8,745.95 . 230. 69 14,800.00 275.85 754.59 382.22 48.65 95.86 49. 31 . 171. 53 621.67 .115.11 109.01 19. 24. 187 .. so 24.00 "C-2" -. WARRANT NO. 41185 41186 '-" 4118 7 41188 41189 41190 "C-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 ·JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS Weber Plywood Company, Plywood Western Salt Company, Lab Salt Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Fees Xerox Computer Services, Computer Service Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction Zellerback Paper Company, Paper TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 196.74 126.94 2.579.50 4,982.13 1,735.68 1,749.00 $155,887.66 "C-3" WARRANT NO. 41056 41057 41058 41059 41060 41061 41062 41063 41064 41065 41066 41067 41068 41069 41070 41071 "C-4" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 28, 1978 . CAPITAL mrrLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS A & T Construction Company, Inc., Contract J-13-1 John Carollo Engineers/Greely Hanson, Constr. P2-23 Cole-Parmer Instruments, Microscope Donovan Construction Company, Stop Notice Pl-16 Eastman, Inc., Office Furniture Johnson Steel Corporation, Contract J-6-lE C. H. Leavell & Company, Contract P2-23-3 Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radios Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 & P2-23-l Perkin Elmer Corporation, Laboratory Equipment The Register, Legal Ad PW-065, I-IR, E-092 Scientific Products, Laboratory Equipment Skipper and Company, Contract PW-055-1 H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2-23-6 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-l & P2-23-3 VWR Scientific, Gas Analysis Assembly TOTAL CORF TOTAL CORF & JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL. DISTRICTS $· $ $ AMOUNT 11,605.50 v 15,447.33 145.06 20,006.25 669.92 4,500.00 252,264.20 3,410.75 166,100.30 1,005.23 258.10 44.65 9,513.72 270,000.00 220.50 495.23 755,686.74 911,574.40 "C-4" .INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28,· 1978 "'-' . WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ,ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 41052 WARRANT NO. 41053 \..,,I WARRANT NO. 41054 WARRANT NO. 41055 "D" Lowry and Associates, Design Engineering 2-19 and 2-20 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND DISTR'ICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF F. B. Cook Corporation, Contract 3-lR-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPER.. FUND DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF F. W. Dodge, Sale of Pipe Ad TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Universal Savings & Loan, Plan Check Deposit Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPER. FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS ~MOUNT $ 8,205.07 $ 8,205.07 AMOUNT $ 2,078.61 $ 2,078.61 AMOUNT $ 87.75 $ 87.75 AMOUNT $ 1,044.37 $ 1,044.37 "D" uE" March 30, 1978 031 TO: FROM: ·SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM J. Wayne Sylvester Ted Hoffman Bid Specification Number A-088, Two ·c 2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA o~· ""8 (714) 540-2910 ~ (714) 962-2411 Sealed bids were opened on March 28, 1978 for furnishing and delivering .two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks. The Tabulations are as follows: Two (2) 9-'Yard Dump Trucks Model Company Total Price Ford F700 Trans West Ford Fontana $30:2405.17 IHC 1700 International Harvester 31,428.311 Anaheim Ford F700 Peck Road Ford 32,857.88 Whittier It is requested that the award be made to Trans West Ford, low bidder, for their bid price of $30,405.17 including sales tax. \.,.) The price of these units exceeds the budgeted amount by $725.17. There are sufficient savings from purchase of ot~er equipment to ~:.~.nsf7_r the p~ded amount to complete this purchase. \"~, (. -c/ l~'{/,.<, .. c;- Ted Hoffmart ,· Chief of Procurement & Property Concur, / · .' /~ · :1 .... , (_, · I . ,,. .' ·1 / /_/y , i • \,.-I -/ -., ') .<.._ W.N. Clarke, Superintendent TH/yh AGENDA ITEM #9(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "E" "F" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0HANGE Cournv, CAuFOHNIA March 31, 1978 030 P.O. nox s121 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM J. Wayne Sylvester Ted Hoffman (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 SUBJECT: Bid Specificatioh No. A-090, Elect~i~ Carts Sealed bids were opened on March 28, 1978, for furnishing and delivering four (4) electric personnel carriers and three (3) electric cargo carriers. The tabulations are as follows: A. Four (4·) Personnel Carrlers Model Company Marketeer 264 GT 370 Nordco Industrial Products Van Nuys Taylor-Dunn Anaheim B. Three (3) Cargo Carriers Model Marketeer 138 12ll8B Company Nordea Industrial Products Van Nuys Taylor-Dunn Anaheim · 1I'o·t·aT ·Price $ 8,128.08 .a,·oa1. 76 1I'otal Price $ :6',.833 .·82 8,122.52 It is requested that Item "A" be awarded to Taylor-Dunn Company for their low bid price of $8,087.76. It is further requested that Item "B" be awarded to Nordea Industrial Products for their low bid price of $6,833.82. Grand total expenditure to be $14,921.58 in- cluding sales tax. Sufficient funds are budgeted for this purchase in the amount of l~5~J.~~J/ /,(<<)/ • • . ~ 1·' / ',:/ .. ;' ;: J. ,· t'. - Ted Hoffman · " Chief of Procurement & Property Concur · , -} ; /, J / _. / /"° I • . . I ( -~ • .. /, , W.N. Clarke, Superintendent TH/yh AGENDA ITFM #9(a) -ALL DISTRICTS "F" "G" RESOLUTION NO. 78-56 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-IR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS.NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REHABILITATION OF ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, JOB NO. I-IR * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by James M. Montgomery, Consulting E~gineers, Inc., Districts' Engineers, and concurred in by the Districts' Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to TRIAD MECHANICAL, INC. for REHABILITATION OF ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, JOB NO. I-IR, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. I-IR be awarded to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the total amount of $371,173.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Cot.msel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS II G" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S 11 E E T March 30, 1978 11:00 A.M . . CONTRACT NO. I-lR '...,t PROJECT TITLE REHABILITATION OF ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION \.,.! "H" PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnishing all material, equipment, supplies and labor for the rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 335,000.00 REMARKS BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------ ~~~~--~~~~~~~---~-~~~-~-~-~~- CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Triad Mechanical Inc. Stanton, CA $371,173.00 2. Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. Upland, CA $395,689.00 3. James E. Hoagland Co. Long Beach, CA $421,500.00 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS II H" II I II RESOLUTION NO. 78-57 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. PW-064A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR COMPRESSOR AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-064A * * * * * * * '* * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to U. S. EQUIPMENT CO., INC. for ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR COMPRESSOR AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-064A, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That the contract for said Job No.-PW-064A be awarded to \,,.,) U. S. Equipment Co., Inc. in the total amount of $43,276.00, in accordance with the terms.of their bid and the prices contained therein; and Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of Cot.mty Sanitation District No. I are hereby authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DJSTRICTS II J II B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S lI E E T . JOB NO. PW-064A. . March 30, 1978 11:00 A.M. \,,,,,1 .· PROJECT TITLE ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR COMPRESSOR AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~~~~~---~-----~~--~-~-~~~ ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 40,000.00 REMARKS . BUDGET. AMOUNT $ -------- ----~~-~~-~~---~~-~~~----~--~~ C0NTRACTOR 1. U.S. Eq~ipment Co., Inc. ,. Lc;:>s Angeles, CA 2. Osterbauer Compressor Service Irvine, CA TOTAL BID $43,276.00 $44,998.70 .3. Compressor Service Co. $45,682.00 II J" Los Angeles, CA ~. I have reviewed the bids and recommend award to U. S. Equipment Co., Inc. of Los Angeles, CA for the bid amount of $43,276.00, as the lowest and best bid. AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II J" II K" RESOLUTION NO. 78-58 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. PW-065 A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARDS OF DI RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l~ 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTI, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS "C" GRIT HOPPER AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-065 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written.reconnnendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be ~ade to PRODUCTION STEEL COMPANY, INC. for MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS "C" GRIT HOPPER AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-065, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-065 be awarded to Production Steel Company, Inc. in the total arnotmt of $14,950.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II K" 0 .l u T A B U L A I i u ~ S H E E T . . JOB NO. PW-065 March 30, 1978 11:00 A.M . MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS. "C" GRIT HOPPER AT PROJECT TITLE TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $20,000.00 BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------- C0NTRACTOR TOTAL BID ·1. Production Steel Co., Inc. $14,950.00 Gardena, CA 2 . . 3. .· ~ 4. II L" I have reviewed the one bid received and find it in keeping with the Plans and Specifications and within the Engineer's Estimate. I, therefore, recommend award to Production Steel Co., Inc. of Gardena, CA in the bid amount of $14,950.00. <1"j~~::*- ... Donald Bogart· '::::::s Senior Engineer I concur with the above recommendation. AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II L." "M" RESOLUTION NO. 78-59 AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATED CONTRACTS FOR PURCHASE OF ELECTRICAL MOTOR ANO SWITCH GEAR FOR CENTRIFUGE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND AWARD PURCHASE ORDER CON-· TRACTS FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR FOR NEW CENTRIFUGE AND ELECTRIC AL SWITCH GEAR FOR SAID MOTOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centri~uge, Specification No. P2-15-1A, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, to be publicly opened and read on March 30, 1978; and, WHEREAS, no bids were received for said specification at the time and place called for; and, WHEREAS, said Electric Motor, afong with necessary Electrical Switch Gear are required to place the Districts new Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge into operation. NOW, THEREFORE, The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager be and is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a purchase order contract for acquisition of an Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64, o.oo Centrifuge at the best terms and conditions and the best price available without compliance with formal bid procedures, for a maximum amotmt not to e·xceed $14,000, including tax and freight; and Section 2. That the General Manager be and is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a purchase order contract for acquisition of appurtenant Electrical Switch Gear for Electrical Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge at the best terms and conditions and best price available without compliance with formal bid procedureu· for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,000, including tax.and freight. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "M" D I D T A n U L A T I 0 N S ll E E T ·. JOB NO. E-092 April 4, 19.78 11:00 A.M. GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NUMBERS PROJECT· TITLE 1 & 2 (REBID OF JOB NO. PW~061A) \,.,I'. - ~ Three gas mixing compressors ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 118,000.00 . BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------- C0NTRACTOR TOTAL BID .. 1. Compressor Service Los Angeles, CA $114,570.00 2. Benz Engineering $116,665.00 Montebello, CA .3. Santa Fe Springs Mfg. I Inc. $187,773.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA 4. I have reviewed the bids and recommend award to Compressor Service Company of Los Angeles, CA for the bid amount of $114,570.00, as the lowest and best bid. I concur "N" Donald Senior the above recommendation. AGE·NDA I TFM #9 (J) -ALL DI STR J CTS "N" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO•~_N_/_A~~~--~~u- 1 C.O. NO·------~~-------------- CONTRACTOR: A & T CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. DATE April 3, 1978. --~----------~------~~--- JOB: SHOPS & •WAREHOUSE SEWER LATERAL~ JOB NO. J-13-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 00. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Extension of Contract Time The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for delays due to inclement weather Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days 63 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension December 29, 1977 30 Calendar Days January 27, 1978 63 Calendar Days 63.Calendar Days 93 Calendar Days March 31, 1978 Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Original Contract Price $ 12,895.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ o.oo Amended Contract Price $ 12,895.00 Board authorization date: April 12, 1978 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California A & T CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Contractor "O" AGENDA ITFM #9(K) -ALL DISTRICTS Chief Engineer ,, O" \._,,I . "P" RESOLUTION NO. 78-60 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-13-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-13-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, A & T Construction Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE SEWER LATERAL, JOB NO. J-13-1, on the 31st of March, 1978; and Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 3. Tha~ construction of Shops·and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated Dececember 29, 1977; and Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with A & T Construction Company setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, is hereby approved; and Section 6. 'lbat the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9 ( L) -ALL DJ STRI CTS II P" "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 78-61 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lE AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, '6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lE AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOlJf AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Johnson Steel Corp., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the purchase order contract for NEW ROOF HATCHES AT OCEAN OtJTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lE, on the 20th of March, 1978; and Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the purchase order contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 3. That construction of New Roof Hatches at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lE, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the purchase order contract therefor, dated January 9, 1978; and Section 4. That the Chairman of District-No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Johnson Steel Corp., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of New Roof Hatches at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lE, is hereby approved; and Section 6. The the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Boards of Directors, in form approved by the General Cotmsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #.9(M) -ALL DISTRICTS "Q" . . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.~_C_-_06_-_1_0_73_-_1_10~----~- C.O. N0. ____ 6 __ ~~--~------~- CONTRACTOR:~_P_a_s_c_a_l __ & __ L_u_d_w_i~g~, __ ln_c_. __________ ~-DATE~~----M_a_r_c_h_2_3~,___.19_7_8 ______ ~ JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT 2 P2-23~1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (X>:al'UOr) $· 14,089. 74 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item No. A. Contract modifications for electrical duct work and differing site conditions: {A) Interfering existing 108" RCP sewer and abandoned manhole structure were discovered during installation of electrical duct runs. The pipe and·buried manhole structure had to be exposed and manhole ren:ioyed to accommodate new c.onstruction. Added costs for this extra work $490.00 (B) Two one-inch electrical ducts were shown on P2-23-6 drawings as work which was to be existing and installed under P2-23-1. The work had not been designated on P2-23-1 drawings and was further extended in the field to prevent paving removal of Road·~·· •. The revision was directed by the des·igned per change drawing P2-23-1. ·1\as an omission from contract drawings. Added costs for electrical ducts $2,164.81 (C) Existing 108 11 RCP sewer, exposed under Item A above, interfered with this electrical duct run. A field work order was issued as detailed in change drawing P2-23-l~~idated August 2, 1977 to reconcile this difference and permit the contractor to complete the installation of the duct. Added costs revised electrical duct run $616.61 TOTAL COSTS FOR THIS ELECTRICAL DUCT WORK AND DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS $3,271.42 B. During the earthwork phase of construction of Road 11 8 11 in vicinity of Karales No. 5 o i 1 we 11 owned by Chevron 0 i1 Company, the company's fie 1 d ma i ntena nee and operations personnel visited the project and requested that the road be realigned to the east to provide minimum maintenance equipment clearances from the edge of proposed road. These required clearances were not detailed in the original contract drawings. The Engineer ruled that the Right-of-Way agreement with the Chevron Oil Company entitled Chevron to the requested clearances. The alignment of the road was changed per revised drawing AR SA. TOTAL COSTS FOR THIS ROAD 11 811 REALIGNMENT -$1,602.22 c~ Contractor encountered an indeterminant amount of unsuitable material from II R-1" what appeared to be an old sludge bed at proposed subgrade of Road "G". The Engineer directed that this unsuitable material be removed, hauled and disposed of off-site and replaced with suitable conpacted fill. TOTAL COSTS FOR OVEREXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION $760.56 AGENDA ITfM #9(N) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" .. - I COUNTY SAN 1 TAT l ON D l S TR l c·; S OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVcNUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ C-_0_6_-1_0_7~3_-1_1_0~~~ C. 0. NO. 6 ~~~~~~~~~~~- CONTRACTOR : Pas ca 1 & Ludwig, Inc. DAT E~~---M_a_r_c_h~23~·~1_97_8~---- JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD I MP ROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT 2 P2-23-1 D. Specified mandrel ling of 611 PVC e1ectrica1 ducts was omitted frcrn P2-23-1 contrac·t which is where this item of work should have been performed. Man- drell ing from Manhole No. 1 to Manhole No. 6 was also omitted from P2-23-3 contract which has contracted to pull cable through duct runs constructed under P2-23-l. It was an omission in both sets of contract drawings. The Engineer directed that this required mandrel ling be done under P2-23-1 contract. TOTAL COSTS OF MANDRELLING ELECTRICAL DUCTS ·s3,531.oo E. Contract modifications to reinforced concrete block flood wall: (A} The Thompson Water Seal as specified in ·the original contract documents was not suitable for below grade application as required for landscaping berm. Additionally, the adverse chemical quality of groundwater dictated that an upgraded waterproofing agent be applied capable of resisting sulfide and saline environment to be experienced by this waterproofing compound..· The Engineer directed the use of Perma-Bar, resulting in added co.sts. · : \wJ Added costs for Perma-Bar in lieu of jhompson's Water .Seal $4,248.42 (B} ·Architectural veneer fascia block was called out on the original contract ·drawings for the fascia block exterior face of concrete pilasters. The original drawings called for this condition below grade also. This was not necessary below grade and the specified work was deleted and credit to :contract received. Credit for elimination of veneer fascia block below grade ($2,994.99) (C} From Station 13+61 to Station 14+28 the original° contract drawings detailed a specified.amount of over-excavation and compacted backfill to provide adequate structural subgrade for flood wall footing over incoming influent sewers. The Engineer field determined that the depth and extent of the required over-excavation and back fill could be reduced. The reduction in depth omitted the requirement for excavation and shoring which was originally required. The contract was credited with this deletion of contr.act work. Credit for elimination of excavation and shoring ($5,000.00) TOTAL CREDIT THIS 110DFICATION ($3,746.57) F. During installation of the 12" CMP drainage units throughout the project, it was determined that the 12" CMP flared inlet and outlet drainage structures had been omitted from the original contract documents. Flared inlet and outlet units are mandatory if road bed erosion is to be curtailed. This . · added cost was directed by the Engineer to rectify this omission from original~ contract documents. Added costs for furnishing and installing 12" CMP flared end sections $1,500.00 "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: . Pas ca 1 & Ludwig, Inc. GRANT No. __ c_-_0_6_-1_0~7~3-_1_1_0~----- c. o. N0. __ ~6--~~~~~~-- DATE~~~~M_a_rc_h~2_3_. __ 19_7_8 __ ~-- JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT 2 P2-23-1 · G. During the construction of the reinforced concrete block wall along Brookhurst the Engineer directed that Plant security be maintained at all times during installation of and completion of flood wa11 with temporary fencing. Original contract documents did not specify such temporary fencing requirements. The added costs reflect Engineer 1 s direction for temporary fencing not shown or called out in original contract documents. TOTAL COSTS FOR TEMPORARY FENCING $5,200.00 H. During the construction of 12 11 decant line from Digester Cleaning Beds, the outlet of the 12" gravity 1 ine interfered with the existing .6 11 ACP plant water 1 ine. Revisions to 12 11 decant line were not possible so plant water ·line was relocated to fit new construction. Plant water line was not shown on the contract drawings. TOTAL COSTS FOR PLANT WATER LINE RELOCATION $1,676.11 I. The original contract drawings indicated that the clean outs for the 10 11 sludge line were in open ground areas not requiring access vaults. The actual field location resulted in locating clean outs in paved areas, thus requ1r1ng access vaults for maintenance. Two vaults were directed to be installed by the Engineer. TOTAL COSTS FOR THESE ADDED VAULTS $895.00 J. The original contract drawings cal led for a temporary fence along the 84 11 RCP effluent 1 ine to contain the contractor's equipment westerly of the District 1 s 84 11 outfall line. The contractor furnished and installed a cable fence of lesser value than the one specified. The contract is credited with the difference in value. TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ($600.00) "R-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-3" ',., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P • 0. £3 0 X 8 1 2 7 -10 8 '1 '1 El LIS /\ VC NU [ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-110 C.O. N0. ___ 6 __ ~-~~~- CONTRACTOR: Pa sea 1 & Ludwig, Inc. DATE March 23, 1978 ~------------~~~----- JOB: FLOOD WALL AND SITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT 2-P2-23-l K. The contractor has requested the following extensions of time due to weather and weather-related delays: August 17, 1977 to August 22, 1977 December 23, 1977 to January 25, 1978 February 6, 1978 to February 16, 1978 Total time requested this change order SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date May 18, 1977 180 Calendar Days November 13, 1977 51 Calendar Days 112 Calendar Days 292 Calendar Days March 5, 1978 -6 Calendar Days -34 Calendar Days -11. Calendar Days -51 Calendar Days Original Contract Price $ 2,268,420.00 ------_;._~--~-- Board authorization date: April 12, 1978 By ___ ~~-------~~-------~~ Contractor p rev. Au th. Changes $ __ ~(9 __ , 1;;...i7~9c;...::..-=0-=2""-) __ This Change (ADD) (~ $ ___ 1_4.:;.._,0_8.;_9_. 7_4 __ Amended Contract Price $ 2, 273' 330. 72 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By __ ~--------------~-:--=-~-:-. ~ Chief Engi~r "R-4" AGENDA ITFM #9(N) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·· C-06-1073-120 \...,' . C.O. No._·--'-~~--~--------~ CONTRACTOR: ___ c~·~H~·L.-Jol~e~a~vMe~J~J~a~n~d~C~om.&U.&+p~a~o~y~-------· DA=fE March 21, 1978 JOB: ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 Job No. P2-23-3 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ __ 2_._, __ 07_8_. 8_0 ___ _ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby. approved. Item A Electrical Duct South of Service Center The electrical duct bank was built in accord with Plans, but did not terminate in proper alignment with its intended entry location at the Service Center. Southern California Edison required that long radius sweeps be used to overcome the mis- alignment. The layout of the sweeps in the duct required the existing duct bank be shortened by appro~imately five feet. Total costs for this change -$928.62 Item B Tread Plate Revision in Turbine Generator Control Room ~The electrical equipment to be installed on the aluminum tread plate prevented the removal of the plate for access to cable tray below. Totql costs for this change -$470. 18 Item C Additional Backfill at Cantrell Tunnel During the co~tractor's excavation for the construction of the Cantrell Tunnel, an existing 36 11 vent line was uncovered and found· to be interfering with planned funnel construction. In order to clear.up the interference, District personnel further excavated the area and relocated the 36" line. This excavation required the contractor to place additional backfill material. Tota] costs for this change -$680.00 I tern D Extensions of Time I terns ·1 through 4 and 6 a re de 1 ays due to rain caus l ng the interruption of the contractor's scheduled \\Ork activities. I tern 5 -the contractor encountered unsu i table subgrade materia 1 during the excav~tion of the base slab for the Service Center. He was directed to remove the unsuitable material and place rock fill to the proper elevation for slab ~construction. The scope of this Extra Work caused a delay to the project of 11 calendar days. "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(0) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" COUNTY S/\NIT/\TION 015·,·,·~lCIS v1 Ot<i\f-.JhE COvi~&Y ·P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNT/\IN V/\LLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.~C~-~0~6-_1~0~7~3--1~2~0~~\v.-s..J- C. O. N0._ ...... 3 _______ _ CONTRACTOR: C. H. Leave 11 and Company DATE~~---M_a_r_c_h~2_1,;._._1_9_7_8~----- JOB: ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 -Job No. P2-23-3 Summary of time extensions: 1 -Delay due ·to weather -Aug. 16 through Aug. 22, 1977 6 c~lendar days 2 -Delay due to weather -Dec. 26, 1977 through Jan. 23, 1978 27 calendar days 3 -Delay due to weather -Jan. 30, 1978 1 ca 1 endar day 4 -Delay due to weather -Feb. 6 throug9 Feb. 20, 1978 14 ca 1 enda r days . 5 -Over-excavation at Service Center 11 calendar days 6 -Delay due to weather -Feb. 28 through Mar. 6, 1978 6 calendar days TOTAL EXTENSION OF TIME THIS CHANGE ORDER -65 CALENDAR DAYS Contract Time Adjustments Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date June 28, 1977 480 Calendar Days October 21, 1978 65 Calendar Days 75 Ca 1 enda r Days 555 Calendar Days January 13, 1979 Ori g i na 1 Cont r act Pr i ce $ __ 2 _, 9 ..... 9-9~, ..... o .... o.w.o"""'o.....,o"'-__ , Prev. Auth. Changes $ ___ 1._4 ...... ...;;;;;2;....;.1..-.6..;.... 7.._9~-- Th is Change (ADD) ( IXti:~~) $ __ ...... 2-.....,_;0..._78~.~8-=-0-- Amended Contract Price $ 3.015, 295. 59 Board authorization date: April 12, 1978 Approved: By ___________________________ ~- Con tractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange Cotjnty, California .By ______ ~--------------=:-=--=-~--:-~--Chief Engineer v "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(0)-ALL DJSTRICTS "S-2',. '..-' .. RESOLUTION NO. 78-62 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-166 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 1liE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 77-166, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,. 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, is hereby further amended to adjust the salary range for the position classification therein, as set forth below: Classification Position Classification Range No. EXHIBIT "B-1" A. OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL 90081 Chief of Industrial Waste 1060A Hourly Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary 10.85/13.51 1881/2342 Section 2. Tilat this resolution become effective April 13, 1978. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular· meeting held April 12, 1978. "T" AGENDA ITFM #9(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "T" RESOLUTION NO. 78-79 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT wrrn PEAT, MARlflCK, ~lITCIIELL 4 C0:·1PANY RE PHASE I REVENUE PROGRAM WORK A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION.DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNfY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITII PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & COMPANY RE PHASE I REVENUE PROGRAM WORK, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE. IN THE PROVISION FOR PAYMENT OF RETAINED FEES * * * * * * * * * * * * . ! . WHEREAS, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 requires preparation of a revenue program providing for user charges and industrial cost recovery, and submittal of said revenue program for approval by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 have here- tofore entered into an agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company for prepara- tion of the Districts' revenue program in compliance with said Act; and; WHEREAS, recent amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972,allowing use of ad valorem truces to satisfy user charge provisions of said Act, will require changes to the Districts' draft revenue p~ogram prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company; and, WHEREAS, upon advice of the State Water Resources Control Board, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company has been directed to delay completion of said revenue program pending publication of regulations implementing said amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972; and, WHEREAS, P~at, Marwick, Mitchell & Company has been further directed to delay completion of said revenue program pending outcome of the proposed Jarvis-Gann local tax limitation initiative, which said initiative, if passed, will have a significant impact on said revenue program; and, II U-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" WHEREAS, the above-referenced .agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company provides for retention by the Districts of certain fees until said revenue program is completed and approved; and, WHEREAS, completion and approval of said revenue program has been delayed due to the circumstances set forth above which are beyond the control of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tha.t Addendum No. 1,, dated , to the Agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company relative to Phase I Revenue Program work, providing for a change in the payment provision to authorize release of retained fees prior to completion of the Districts' final revenue program, is hereby authorized and approved. Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said addendl.DD in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. "ll-2" AGENDA ITEM #Cu) -ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 78-67-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ORANGE RE MAINTENANCE OF STACY LANE PUMPING STATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ORANGE FOR MAINTENANCE OF STACY LANE PUMPING STATION * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the agreement dated ·between the City ~~~~~~~~~- of Orange and County Sanitation District No. 2, providing for maintenance and operation of Stacy Lane Pumping Station, servicing Tract No. 9713 within the City of Orange, by District No. 2, is hereby authorized and approved. Section 2. That the City reimburse District No. 2 quarterly for all costs incurred by the District in connection with said maintenance and operation; plus 15% for administration and overhead. Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of District 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. . "V" AGENDA ITEt-~ #9.(v) -DISTRICT 2 "W" RESOLUTION NO. 78-68-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH YORBA LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR DEFERRAL OF ANNEXATION FEES FOR PORTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 21 -UPPER K RANCH ANNEXATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AlITHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH YORBA LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR DEFERRAL OF ANNEXATION FEES FOR PORTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 21 -UPPER K RANCH ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange Comity, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain .agreement dated---------by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and the Yorba Linda Cotmty Water District for deferral of annexation fees for a 3.39 acre reservoir site within the botmdaries of proposed Annexation No. 21 -Upper K Ranch Annexation to Cotmty Sanitation District No. 2, be approved; and Section 2. That said agreement provides that deferment of the annexation fees for the 3.39 acre reservoir site is granted until such time as the land use changes and sewer service is required, and the District annexation fees in effect at that time will apply; and Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the Gen~ral Cotmsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. AGENDA ITFM #9Cz) -DISTRICT 7 "W" RESOLUTION NO. 78-69-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BROADMOOR HOMES 1 INC. AND CITY OF YORBA LINDA FOR DEFERRAL OF ANNEXATION FEES FOR PORTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 24 -TRACT NO. 9813 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENf WITII BROADMOOR HOMES, INC. AND CITY OF YORBA LINDA'FOR DE- FERRAL OF ANNEXATION FEES FOR PORTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 24 -TRACT NO. 9813 TO COUNfY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 * * * * * * * * ~ * * The Board of Directors·of Cotmty Sanitation.District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and ~~---~~---~---- between County Sanitation District No. 2, Broadmoor Homes, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda for deferral of annexation acreage fees indefinitely on properties (park sites and open space) dedicated to the City of Yorba Linda; and payment of annexation acreage fees on the remaining territory within the boundaries of Annexation No. 24 -Tract No. 9813 to County Sanitation District No. 2, in four installments as follows: Area A B c D is hereby approved; and Due Date for Payment of Fees June 30, 1977 December 31, 1978 ·December 31, 1979 December 31, 1980 Section 2. 1bat said agreement provide for deferment of the annexation fees on park sites and open space dedicated to the City of Yorba Linda only until such time as the land is developed and sewer service· is required, and that upon such development the District annexation fees in effect at that time will apply and · shall be immediately due and payable; and Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said .agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. "X" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) -DISTRICT 2 II X"" ....,_; COUNTY SANJTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -1084~ ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·~--N~/_A~~----~~-- C .O. N0·~~-3~~~~--~~--- CONTRACTOR: F. B. COOK CORPORATION DATE~~~~~M_a_r_c_h~l_3_, __ 1~9~7~8.;;_ __ _ Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, JOB:~~~~~M~1~·~1=1~e~r_-~H~o~l~d~e~r::__T~r~u~n~k~,~C~o~nut~rwa~c~ti.........lN~o~.~3--~l~R~--3'--~~~~~~----~~--- Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ (104. 68) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr9ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Replace 25 sacks of plastic cement borrowed from warehouse at beginning of construction_ of this project. The cement was unavailable at time of work. 25 sacks @ $3.95/sack 6% tax Total No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Change!> This Change (KdtfJ (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: Approved: $ $ $ $ $ 98.75 5.93 $104.68 48,431.20 6,744.50 (104.68) 55,071.02 April 12, 1978 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF F. B. COOK CORPORATION • By , # Contractor Engineer "Y" AGENDA ITEM #9(BB) -DISTRICT 3 "Y" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·· __ N_/_A ______ -----:lw..,,.J.- C. O. N0. __ ~4 __________________ _ .CONTRACTOR: F. B. COOK CORPORATION ·oATE ________ M_a_r_c_h_2_1_, __ 19_7_8 ______ _ JOB: Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3 Amount of this Change Order ~II~ (DEDUCT) $ 481.50 In a·ccordance with contract provisions, the fo11owing changes in the contn~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT: Item No. 36 Unit Sq.Ft. Change Est'd Quant. From To 750 643 Difference 107 @ 4.50/Sq.Ft. TOTAL DEDUCT: EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for delays due to procurement of plastic cement required for this project. The Contractor is hereby granted an extension of contract time for delays due to inclement weather TOTAL TIME EXTENSION "Z-1" . AGENDA ITEM #9(cc) -DISTRICT 3 $481.50 $481 .so 32 Calendar Days 68 Calendar Days 100 Calendar Days "Z-1" -. • .. - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_/_A ____________ _ 4 C.O. NO. ________________ ~-- CONTRACTOR: ___ F_._B_. __ c_oo_K __ co_R_P_O_RA_T_l_ON ________ ~-DATE. __ ~----M-a_r_c_h_2_1_, __ 19_7_8 ____ _ JOB: Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date July 29, 1977 120 Calendar Days November 25, 1977 100 Calendar Days . 115 Calendar Days 235 Calendar Days March 20, 1978 Or.i gi na 1 Contract Price Prev. Auth; Changes This .Change~ (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price $ 48,431.20 $ 6,639.82 $ (481.50) $ 54,589.52 Boa rd authorization date: Apri 1 12, 1978 Approved:· F. B. COOK CORPORATION "Z-2" Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By~~~~----~------~------~ Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #9Ccc) -DISTRICT 3 "Z-2" RESOLUTION NO. 78-71-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-lR-3 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-IR-3 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT . * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, F. B. Cook Corporation, has completed the work in accordance with the texms of the contract for REPAIR OF PLASTIC LINED MANHOLE SHAFTS, MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 3-IR-3, on the 20th day of March, 1978; and Section 2. That.by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and · Section 3. That Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated July 29, 1977; and Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 3 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and Section·s. That the Final Closeout Agreement with F. B. Cook Corporation setting forth the tenns and conditions for acceptance of Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, is hereby approved; and Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a ~egular meet~ng held April 12, 1978. ~. II AA" AGENDA ITEM #9(nn) -DISTRICT 3 II AA" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS'AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. N/A ~----~------~-------c. o. No._· ___ 1 __________________ _ -CONTRACTOR: Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. ·oArE March 29, 1978 Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15 (From Knott JOB: Avenue to Western Avenue), Contract No; 3-22-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 00. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated March 23, 1978 I 1. Change all 45" R.C.P. to 48" R.C~·P. including any additional items of work related to this change. · The availability of 48" R.C.P. will enable the Contractor. to meet the 90-day contract completion date. · 2. Change starting point of project from Orangethorpe and Knott Avenue to Orangethorpe and Western Avenue including any additional items of work related to this change. The Contractor feels he can shorten the duration of the job by changing the starting point of the project. No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price $ 540,287 .00 Board authorization date: PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. Prev. Auth. Changes $ o:oo This Change (ADD} (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 540,287.00 April 12, 1978 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California Contractor "BB" AGENDA ITEM #9(EE) -DISTRICT 3 · Chlef Engineer "BB" .. • ·' INITIAL ST~DY EVALUATION OF ENVIRO~'?·~rITAL IMPACTS CouN1Y SANITATION D1srmc1 of CHANGE Cournv: CAUFOGNIA P.O. OOX 8127 108'.C £ll IS A\'O:tir FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALlrORNIA 92708 (71.C) 5.C0-2910 (71~) 962-2.C 11 v This fonn shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the California Enviromnental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, dated January 12, 1977. Title and Location of Project Westside Force. Main, Second Unit, Contract ------------~--------~--------------_;._------~--- No. 3-13-1 Desc:ription of Project The proposed project consists of a 30" force main running from the Seal Beach Pump Station at Seal Beach Blvd. along West~inster Blvd. to Rancho St. in Westminster. The ·line will have ·a rated capacity of 19 MGD. V GUIDELINES .1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 2S? · Yes X No (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form) 2. Docs the project qualify as: a. Ministerial (Section SJ Yes No X b. Emergency (Section 13) Yes__ No X c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 31) Yes No X d. Categoric1lly exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section .12) Yes__ No X e. Involves another. agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 33) Yes No X - (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Asscs!lmcnt/En\'ironmcntal Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.) "CC-1" AGENDA ITFM #9(FF) DISTRICT 3 . II CC-1" '· .. .. If there is no affirmati.vc action to Item 2 above, complete the following: 3. Initial study procedures A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (Sec Section 32) , 1. Will the project hc.ve any significant effect on the environment as per the following: a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have been adopted by the community where the project is to be located? Yes No X b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect? Yes No X c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species· of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes ____ No X d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? Yes No X e. Does it breach any published national, state or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? Yes No X f: Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water qual it)':, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas? Yes No X . g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? Yes No~· . h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation? Yes No X -· i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic hazards? Yes No X j. ls it likely to generate growth? Yes ~ No If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail. The proposed project will accommodate existing and approved . . developments in Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, Cypress and La Palma that have already been through the CEQA process. . . - If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report may be required. 4. If there is no sir,nificant impact as set forth in Item 3, a throur.h j, a . Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown ".-' in the "Guidelines lr.lplcmcntiug the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Amended" "CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #9CFF) -DJSTRICT·3 II CC-2" \ .. S. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in • • r causing i)r<.:p~1 r ~ t H>n o.... :;:1:ac. Recommendation preparation of a Negative Declaration for the ----------~--------~--------------,;:__~------~--------~-----------~v project based on the findings of the Environmental Analysis. Senior Engineer 3/31/78 Date • . . .. "CC-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(FF) -DISTRICT 3 . "CC-3" ~. RESOLUTION NO. 78-72 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK B, UNIT S, ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-8-R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS PF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK B UNIT 5, ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO." 5-8-R . . * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange CoWlty, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by·the Districts' Chief Engineer for SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK B, UNIT 5, ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-8-R, are hereby approved and adopted; and Section 2. That the Boards ratify the action of the Secretary in advertising ·.for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, which said bids were received until 11:00 a.m., March 30, 1978, and at that time were publicly opened.and read by the Secretary of the Board and Districts' engineers. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. "DD" A~ENDA ITEM #9(GG) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "DD" RESOLUTION NO. 78-73 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. 5-8-R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNfY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK B, UNIT S, ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-8-R * * * * * * * * * ~ * * The Boards of Directors of Cotmty Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer,.that award of contract be made to RODDING-CLEANING MACHINES, INC. for SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK _B,_ UNIT 5, ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-8-R, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. 5-8-R be awarded to Rodding- Cleaning Machines, Inc. in the total amount of $216,114.25, in accordance with '-I the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and Section 3. That all other bids received for said work are her~by rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders; and Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District . No. S, acting for itself and on behalf .of District No. 6 1 are ~ereby.authorized to execute said contract in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hel~ April 12, 1978. "EE'; AGENDA ITEM #9(11) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "EE" B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S II E E 'I' March 30, 1978 11:00 A.M . . CONTRACT NO. 5-8-R SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK B, UNIT 5 PROJECT TITLE ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP STATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Slip line existing 24" conc~ete cylinder pipe with 22" diameter polyethylene pipe ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 225,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ ------- CONTRACTOR SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE.B 1. Rodding Cleaning Machines . Los Angeles, CA $216,114.25 No Bid 2. Bebek Co. Irvine, CA $419,425.00 $441,500.00 3. I._) 4. I have reveiwed the bids and recommend award to Rodding Cleaning Machines of Los Angeles, CA for the bid amount of $216,114.25 for Schedule A, as the lowest and best bid. I concur with the above recommendation. Engineer II FF" AGENDA ITEM #9C11) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "FF" "GG" ~ \ G. L. LEWJ.S cor.~~1 /~i·JY \ ' . \ ·"----·-·--·-··· .. -·-· -·-.. ~ PETITION FOR ANNEXATION March 13, 1978 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 It is hereby requested that the Lerritory generally d~scriL~d as Tract 9472, in the City of Orange southeast of the inter- section of Santiago Canyon Road and Jamestown Way and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accor- dance with the District's annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for annexation: Property Owner G.L. Lewis Company 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Orange CA (714) 633-4400 Gross Acreage: 7.08 Assessed Value: $42,250.00 Number of Registered Voters: 0 92668 Also enclosed ·is the Initial Study form required by the Local Agency Formation Conunission. Also a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the District's proceasing fee is in- cluded herewith. Sincerely, • LEWIS COMPA7, ;(-~ ;James L. Halls Vice President Community Relations JLH:vc enclosures AGENDA ITFM #9CNN) -DJSTRICT 7 _ 17'15 Oranunwood Av1~11t11! " Oranue. C.1l1toini;) 9:Wn8 1:1 (71'\) n:;:~-4'100 "GG" RESOLUTION NO. 78-63 . RE: SCAG DRAFT EARLY ACTION PROGRAM DESIGN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO SCAG 208 EARLY ACTION PROGRAM DESIGN -MANAGEMENT OF THE SEWAGE SLUDGE IN THE SAN DIEGO CREEK WATERSHED AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500)~ the Southern California Association of Governments :(SCAG) is the designated 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Mana~ernent Planning Agency for the South Coast 208 Area, and, WHEREAS, SCAG has a 208 Plan Approval and Adoption Process which was circulated for local government review and comment in February,· 1977, and approved by the SCAG Executive Committee in March, 1977; and, WHEREAS, said 208 Plan.Approval and Adoption Process requires that each Major Planning Product produced during the 208 Planning Program be formally approved by affected agencies, and subsequently adopted by implementing agencies; and, WHEREAS, under the definitions of the 208 Plan Approval and Adoption Process all Major Planning Products will constitute elements of a 208 Plan, once approved and adopted; and, WHEREAS, SCAG has completed a draft Major Planning Product, entitled "Early Action Program Design -Management of the Sewage Sludge in the San Diego Creek Watershed Area"; and, "HH-1" AGENDA ITFM #12{B)(l) -ALL. DISTRICTS "HH-1" WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) have been identified by SCAG as an agency "affected~ by the findings or recommendations contained in the portion of said document entitled "Early Action Program Design -Management of the Sewage Sludge in the San Diego Creek Watershed Area", hereinafter in some instances referred to as Early Action Program; and, WHEREAS, said Early Action Program generally reflects the status of sewage sludge management in the San Diego Creek watershed through November 20, 1977; and WHEREAS, sewage sludge management practices in the San Diego Creek watershed are in a state of dynamic flux and have undergone changes since November 20, 1977, and are expected to undergo further changes in the future which are not considered in said Early Action Program; NOW THEREFORE: The Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, ·2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE and ORDER: · SECT-ION 1. That said Districts have reviewed the above referenced Early Action Program Design --Management of the Sewage Sludge in the San Diego Creek Watershed Area, and hereby approve said document as of November 20, 1977, subject to the comments set forth on attached Exhibit "A", and by reference hereto incorporated herein. l\f,t:NnA ITFM #12(s)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "HH-2" SECTION 2. That said Districts, by approving said Early Action Program Design --Management of the Sewage Sludge in the San Diego Creek Watershed Area are expressing concurrence with the information and courses of action contained therein, subject to the concerns stated herein and with the express·intent and understanding that such concurrence applies only to those actions which remain applicable in the context of present practices and future conditions and does not commit the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to any future.actions which may be described in the document. SECTION 3. That the Secretary of the Districts be and is hereby directed to submit a certified copy of this resolution to the Southern California Association of Governments subsequent to April 12, 1978, along with any additional comments deemed appropriate ?Y the Districts' staff. ·PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. "HH-3" . AGENDA ITEM #12(B)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "HH-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TE L E ·P.,H 0 N ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. C. BOX 8127, F'OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF'ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF'F'·RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 28, 1978 Southern California Association of Governments 600 s. Commonwealth Avenue,. Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90005 Attention: Supervisor Dennis Hansberger President of SCAG Re: Requested Approval Action of the SCAG '208 Ea·r1y Acti·on· Pr·o·gram · · · The Early Action Program Design adequately portrays the status of sewage sludge management in the San Diego Creek Watershed through December, 1977. The purpose of this letter is to update the Program Design and propose a future course of action regarding the above. It should be noted that sewage sludge management in the San Diego Creek Watershed is under- going dramatic changes and the Early Action Program Design . does not accurately reflect the cond·itions or anticipated .future actions. The following is a list of technical errors intended to update and correct the Early Action Program Design: "HH-4" l.~ The report -should state that the intent of the· sludge management program is to control nutrient and bacteria runoff into Upper Newport Bay. 2. It should be noted that the Districts' sludge is about 20% solids. 3. The Districts object to the conclusions drawn re- garding physical solutions to the site problems at Golden West Fertilizer because it lacks inclusion of all feasible economic alternatives and does not discuss fiscal impacts of those listed. EXHIBIT "A" AGENDA ITrM #12(B)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "HH-4" 'Supervisor Dennis Hansberger March 28, 19·78 Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 1084.C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 5.C0-2910 (71.c) 962-2.C 11 It should be noted that the Golden West Fertilizer Company has been notified by The Irvine Company that their ground lease will be terminated by June 30, 1978. It is believed that this notifi- cation is a direct result of past poor sludge management practices and the 208 study on sludge management in the San Diego Creek Water- shed. The Districts are in discussions with The Irvine Company to let the Districts take over the lease; as of this date, the matter has not been resolved. The Districts are now in a very serious position of having to dispose of over 100 tons of sludge per day with no composting location. The Sanitation Districts formally request that SCAG place sewage sludge management in the San Diego Creek Watershed into the Con- tinuing Action Program and devote funds and re~qurces to finding a sewage sludge processing location to serve all Orange County Sanitation facilities in connection with the EPA sponsored ~/OMA study and adequate technology is developed and constructed to handle the problem. These comments reflect the Sanitation Districts' position re- garding the Early Action Design Program •. "HH-5" EXHIBIT "A'.' Yours very truly, Donald Saltarelli Joint Chairman, CSDOC AGENDA ITFM #12(B){l) -ALL DISTRICTS "HH-5" RESOLUTION NO. 78-64 RE: SCAG 208 MILESTONE REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO THE SCAG 208 MILESTONE REPORT WHEREAS, pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500); the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the designated 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Agency for the South Coast 208 Area, and, WHEREAS, SCAG has a 208 Plan Approval and Adoption Process which was circulated for local government review and comment in February, 1977, and approved by the SCAG Executive Committee in March, 1977; and, WHEREAS, such 208 Plan Approval and Adoption. Process requires that each Major Planning Product produc.ed during the 208 Planning Program be formally approved by affected agencies, and subsequently adopted by implementing agencies; and, WHEREAS, under the definitions of the 208 Plan Approval and Adoption Process all Major Planning Products wlll constitute elements of a 208 Plan, once approved and ~dopted; and, WHEREAS, SCAG has completed a draft Major Planning . Product, entitled The Milestone Report; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) have been identified by SCAG as an agency affected by the information and findings contained in the said document; and, II Il-1" AGENDA ITEM #J2CB)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "11-1" WHEREAS, said Districts are reluctant to approve a part of a final product of unknown nature, impact, and cost which ~ may later be the responsibility of said Districts or one of its Member :.iunicipalities to adopt and implement; and WHEREAS, CSDOC has reviewed the said document and has stated its specific concerns in a letter to SCAG, a copy of which is attached bereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein; NOW THEREFORE: The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts N?S· 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County DO HEREBY RESOLVE" DETERMINE AND ORDER: SECTION 1. That said Districts hereby receive and file said SCAG Milestone Report as a.draft .summary of the back- ground data collection and problem analysis accomplished during Phase I of SCAG's 208 Program, subject to the comments set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. SECTION 2. That said action by these Districts does not constitute approval of ·The Milestone Report or any of the contents or recommendations contained therein. SECTION 3. That a revised Milestone Report incorporating the changes set forth herein will be considered for approval by these Districts only at such time as it becomes a part of the draft 208 Plan Report and only at such time as the draft 208 Plan Report is being considered for approval. II J 1-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(B)(2) -ALL. DISTRICT "I J-2" • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. a. sax Bl 27. F'CUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF'CRNIA. 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID CF'F·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Southern California Association of Governments March 28, 1978 600 s. Conunonwealth Avenue, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, California 90005 Attention: Supervisor Dennis Hansberger President of SCAG · Subject: Requested Approval Action of the · · SCAG. 2o·s· Mi"l"estone· Re·p·o·rt TELEPHONES: AREA CDDE 71-4 540-2910 962-2411 The Sanitation Districts have reviewed the 208 Milestone Report and finds that it can only receive and file the Report as an editorial summary of the Phase I 208 work. In comparing the Task Elements submitted to SCAG from the County of Orange and Newport Irvine Waste-Management Agency (NIWA) with the Milestone Report it becomes very apparent that much of the context is lost by summarization. Reconunendations expressed in t~e Task Elements that appeared to be fairly sound lost much of their impact and came across as very subjective because of sum- marization in the Report. It becomes even more clear in our minds· that when these Task Elements are summarized by individuals (however capable).who are not intimately familiar with the local problems or engineering aspects thereof, the interpretation and summarization is lost. It should also be noted that the Sanitation Districts, as a political body, cannot, in due conscience, endorse a~y Report that does not adequately portray the fiscal impacts upon the taxpayers. Before the Sanitation Districts can act in a positive manner it must know the financial consequences of such action. EXHIBIT "A" u I 1-3" AGENDA ITFM #17CB)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS II 11-3" Supervisor Dennis Hansberger March 28, 1978 Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 It is the recommendation of the Sanitation Districts that the comments received from the Districts member municipalities be incorporated into the Report and that the Report receive a thorough review with respect to its base information, the Task Elements, and that it be rewrit~en before incorporation into the Final 208 Plan. "11-4" Yours very truly, Donald Saltarelli Joint Chai~an, CSDOC AGENDA ITEM #12(B)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "II-4" RESOLUTION NO. 78-65 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES OF RETIRED DIRECTOR DONALD WINN'S REPRESENTATION IN CASA A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF RETIRED DIRECTOR DONALD WINN'S REPRESENTATION IN THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES THROUGH ANNUAL 1978 MEETING * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, retiring Director Donald Winn has previously been active in the County Sanitation Districts of Orange ColDlty participation in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA); and, WHEREAS, retiring Director ·Donald Winn is presently serving as a member of the CASA Board of Directors; and, ~REAS, said term on the CASA Board of Directors will.not expire until the close of the CASA Annual Conference in August, 1978. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of Cot.mty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the continued representation of retired Director Donald Winn in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies through said Associat.ion 's Annual Work Conference in August, 1978, is hereby approved; and that during such period, Donald Winn shall be entitled to receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day, but in no event shall the representative's total compensation exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month; and, Section 2. When traveling on such business, said representative shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the ~ourse of said II JJ-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "JJ-1" travel in accordance with the following schedule: Conunercial Transportation -per actual invoice Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupany Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee Ground Transportation -as itemized Personnel Vehicle -First 1-150 miles per month @ $.15/mile -Next 151-600 miles per month @ $.12/mile Next 601+ miles per month @ $.06/mile Telephone Service -as itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -Actual cost of the representative's personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting. Section 3. That the authorization provided for by this resolution shall expire after CASA's Annual Work Conference in August, 1978. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. "JJ-2" AGENDA ITFM #l/(c)(2) -Al.L DISTRICTS II ,JJ-2" TLW:pj ! 04/05/78 RESOLUTION NO. 78-78-7 AMENDING .ANNEXATION POLICY RE PLANNING STUDY FEE. FOR AREAS TRIBUTARY TO ORANGE PARK ACRES ' A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-44-7, AS AMENDED, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT RE PAYMENT OF AREAWIDE: PLANNING STUDY FEE FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES AND ADJACENT TERRITORY * * . * * * WHEREAS, it is the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this District has u heretofore adopted such requirements including a fair apportion-V ment of costs incurred by the District in reviewing and approving request for annexation; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to. conduct an areawide planning study for the local sewer system to serve .the Orange Park Acres area and inunediately adjacent territory, in order to properly plan sai~ local sewer system and the effect on the District's trunk sewer system; and, WHEREAS, certain of these studies have been undertaken by the District's Staff and consulting engineers; and, .WHEREAS, the cost of said areawide study should appropriately oe borne by the properties currently outside the District boundaries that will, in all probability, annex to the District, "LL-1" AGENDA ITEM #25Cc} -DISTRICT 7· "LL-1" and thereby benefit from s u ch study . NOW , THEREFORE , the Boa r d of Directors of County Sanit ation Di strict No . 7 of Orange County , California , does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Section 1 of Resolution No. 75-44 -7, as amended is hereby furth e r amended by adding subsection (h) as follows : 11 (h) In addition to all other terms and conditions set for t h herein, an areawide planning study fee of $50.00 per acre, shall be paid by the proponents of any applica- tion for annexation of territory in the .Orange Park Acres area and imme diately adjacent territory, and generally described as northerly of Ch apman Avenue and easterly of Santiago Blvd., to the District 's territorial limit , and more parti cularly shown on the sketch attached hereto as Exhibit 11 A 11 and incorporated herein by reference ." Section 2 : That the provisions of this Resolution sha ll apply to any annexation of terr i tory to the District , which annexation becomes effective and final on or after April 12 , 1978 . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1 978. -2- II LL-2" AGENDA ITEM #25Cc) -DISTR ICT 7 "LL -2" . II MM" ·~~ Ai& an aheim hills, inc. February 21, 1978 Sanitation District #2 County of Orange 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca lifornia 92708 ATTN: Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer Re: Propos e d Annex a tion #28 Dear Mr. Lewis: In accord ance with our discussion on December 28, 1977, I am submitting · a new Sanitation District Annexation map for proposed. Annexation #28 covering a gross area of 240.858 acres. Within the boundaries of this map there a re indicated 36 .412 acres a s permanent Open Space which are in th e proces s of being dedicated to the County of Orange as a perman e nt Open Space easement . There are also 1 6 .227 ac r es that are within the Southern California Edison Com- pany Easement that the County of Orange has already accepted as a p e rm a n e nt Open Space easement. We, therefore, respectfully~r eq u es t that the County Sanitation District def er the a n nexation ac r eage fee fo r the above-mentioned two parcels tot a lling 52 .639 acres and actually a nnexing 188 .219 acres . I b e lieve a precedent was established in deferring the Ana h eim Hills Golf Cours e until such time · that i t might revert to land d evelopme nt. Please cont act John Bohac a t our off ice if you d es ire any additional inform a tion. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. ~/'~~ Hor s t Jahor Sr. Vic e President Dev e lopme nt JB:HJS:nj g Attachments AGENDA ITEM #28(A) -DI STRICT 2 380 ANAH E I M H ILLS ROAD. AN A H E IM. CALI FORN I A 92807. PHON E 17 141 998 -2000 II MM II .- 1,,,,,,,,J' "NN'' 0 . L~ anaheim hills, inc. February 21, 1978 Sanitation District #2 County of Orange 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 ATTN: Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer Dear Mr. Lewis: In accordance with our discussion late last year, I am submitting to you a request to provide for the payment of our above-referenced Sanitation District Annexation in the amount of ·$254,472.09 over a four-year period. We propose that our 1972 agreement form be utilized which made similar financial arrangements. The reason for our request is that lengthy City Annexation-and General Plan amendment procedures as well as design and construction work, will delay the building and occupancy of homes for several years. We hope that you can submit our request to the Board at its next sched- uled hearing in March, 1978. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, . ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. e~~ Sr. Vice President Development JB:HJS:njg Attachments AGENDA ITEM #28(B) -DISTRICT I 380 ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD. ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA n:>B07, PHONE f714199R-1000 "NN'' RESOLUTION NO. 78-70-2 COMMENDING JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. FOR OUTSTANDING WORK RE EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO ORANGE SUB-TRUNK SANTA ANA RIVFR CROSSING A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING JOHN A. ARTUKOVICH SONS, INC. FOR_ OUTSTANDING WORK IN CONNECTION WITH EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO STORM-DAMAGED ORANGE SUB- TRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, on Sunday, March 12, 1978, the County Sanitation District No. 2 Orange Sub-Trunk Sewer Santa Ana River Crossi.ng was undermined by storm runoff water in the Santa Ana River, causing said sewer to rupture and collapse; and, WHEREAS, said storm damages to the Or~ge Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing resulted in the discharge of wastewater to the open river channel.creati~g a situation demanding immediate action to return said facility to an operational mode in order to protect the public interest and safety; and, WHEREAS, at the call of District officials John A. Artukovich. Sons, Inc. responded immediately and judiciously with equipment, materials and labor neces- s_ary to effect emergency repairs to place said Orange Sub-trunk Santa Ana River Crossing back in service at the earliest possible moment to safeguard life, health and property; and, WHEREAS, mobilizat~on, procurement of ~aterials, services, supplies and logistical support required to determine the nature and extent of the. damages and to cause the temporary emergency repairs thereto were all accomplished mos.t ex- peditiously under extremely difficult and hazardous circumstances; and, WHEREAS, to finish said temporary emergency repairs the contractor, John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., its principal, ~ohn A. Artukovi~h, ~d its employees put forth a maximum effort, remaining on the job site continuously for the last twenty-four hours preceding completion of said temporary repairs in order to place the facility back in service, which said service was restored at 6:30 a.rn., Monday, March 20, 1978; and, "00-1" AGENDA ITEM #29(B) -DISTRICT 2 "00-1" ~. U· WHEREAS, the contractor has remained available for immediate call to install further materials necessary to maintain the integrity of the temporary facility pending construction of a permanent siphon to replace the Orange Sub-trunk Santa Ana River Crossing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY: Adopt this resolution expressi~g the Directors' sincere and honest appreci- ation to John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., and commending its principal, John A. Artukovich, and each employee engaged in the work to effect temporary em~rgency repairs and restore service to the District's Orange· Sub-trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, for their outstanding and meritorious effort in the best tradition of cooperation in the public interest. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 12, 1978. noo-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(B) -DJSTRICT 2 -2- "00-2" .. - 4-12-78 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN INTRODUCE NEW MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS, CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M,J HEDNESDAYJ APRIL 26TH, INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: BERNARD _l:l ous-TO noNAL ~ STANLEY MEYER HARRY MILLER '· .. MEn1 rG DATE DbST 1ICT 1 Apri l 1 2, 19 78 TIME 7 :30 p.m. DI S T RI CTS 1,2 ,3,S,6 ,7 & 11 !W·L 1) .•••••.• SHARP.: ••••• _L_ ---- IL Y) •••••.• -ANTHONY ····-~ ---- ORTf z ) ••••••• -EV/\NS · • • • • • -~ ---- BRI GGS ) •••••• ·RI MA ······· • ....l.L. ---- DI STR ICT 2 FR JE p) •..•..•. \~EDAA · • · • • • -~ ---- HOYT ) .•...•..• SMITH ••• ···-~ ---- R IL EY) .••.•••• CLl'tRIC ••.. • • .-l.L ---- COO PEr ) .•.•• • .FQX . · · • • • • · -~ ---- ROGET) ...•••• -GRAHA M .•. ·.-~ ---- DE J ESUS ) .•.• -HOL T······· ._i.L ---- WELLS) ...••••. HOUST ON ..••. __i.L ___ _ EV ANS ) ..•.•... ORT! Z. • • • • • ·_.\..L. ___ _ CULV ER ) •••••. -PERRY .·.··· ·-\..L ___ _ TH OM) ..•..•.•. ROT H· · • · • · • • ,/ ___ _ ADLER) .•.••••. STANTON ·.·· ·-LL ___ _ (WINT ERS) .•.••• VELASQUEZ ·· .___i.L ___ _ DI STRICT 3 ADL ER •...•..• SVA LSTAD · · • -~·--__ LAC AYO) .•••••. HUDSON · • · • • ·-4.L ___ _ PER RY ) ....•••• C ULVER ·.···-~--__ COOP ER ) ...••.• GAMBIN/\ · · • • ·~--__ BLACKMAN) .•••. GRAY .••.•. ··--°==='-___ _ GR IF F I N) •..... ~EY§R-. · • • • • ·~ ___ _ WEISHAUPT) •... MIL L ER .·····~ ___ _ FINLAY SON ) ...• OLSO N .·.···· 0- EV ANS ) ..•...•. ORTIZ······· \/"" ---- NY BORG) •••.•• -PRIEST······~==== YOUNG) ...••••• ROGET .······~ ___ _ TH OM) •..••.••• RO TH-.·····-~ ___ _ RIL EY) .••••..• SCHMIT.:..···~ ___ _ BRO\•/N) ....•••• SY LV I A .• ···-~ ___ _ PATTINSON) .... \·/J EDER .•.•• -~ ___ _ VELA SQUEZ) .... \·O NTERS . · · • ·~ ___ _ DI STRICT 5 (D OS TAL)······ ·MC INNIS····~ ---- (AN THONY )····· ·RILEY ·······~ ---- (\'/I LLI AMS) ·····DOSTA L ····· ._i.L' ---- DI STR ICT 6 !BRI GGS ) .••••.• RIMA ....• ·.~ ---- DOSTA[J .....•. RYCKOF F •••• ~ ---- RILE Y) ••••.••. AN TH ONY •••• .....J.L.. ---- DI STRICT 7. DO ST Al)······ ·BA RR ETT ····· V------- GAIDO · • • · • · • ·VA RDO ULIS · • ·-\,.L ___ _ RILEY • · • · · • • CLARK·······~ ---- ORTI Z ········EVfl.NS ·······-\,.L ___ _ HUT CHISON )··· ·GL OCIWER • · • ·~ ___ _ l~ELStl) ········SAL TAR ELLI • ·--1L' ___ _ HOYT) · • • • • • • • ·SM I TH · • • • • • ·--lL' ___ _ DI STRJCT 11 GIBil S ·······-PA TTI NSON ··-~ ___ _ Pfl.TT l t~SON) ····SHENKMAN ····~ ___ _ R IL EY)·· .... --SC HMIT--· .. • i.----___ _ DI STRJCT 8 L l'/RENCE · • · • · ED\·/~Ttr---...:.... /\ND · · · • • · • • ·R I LEY • · · · · · ·=::_:....;_=~_:-::_-_ 4-11 -78 JOINT BOARDS RILEY)········ ·ANTHONY····~ __ ~~~~~::::::::~~~~'.'.:::: ~ ==== PE RRY ·········C ULVER ·····~~ \~ILLI (\MS ) ······DOS T A L·····~ --,1 8J ORTIZ)········ ·EV ANS ······~ __ "'1 lO COO PER )······· ·F OX········~ __ COOPER )········ GA MI3 I NA ···· _iL' __ HU TCHJSON )·····GLQGKNE~ •· ~ ROGET)········ ·G RA HAM····· v -- DLACKMAN ) ······GRAY ······· 0---- DE JE S US)······ HOLT······· ~ -- \'/E LLS)········· HOUSTON ···· _iL -- LACAYO)········ HU DSON ·····~== DO STA L)········ MC I NNIS··· _\.L.. __ (GR I FFJN )·······l4EYER ·····_.l.L' (\'/E I SHAUP T ) ·····M ILL ER ·····~--_ !FI NLAYSON )···· ·O L SON ······~== EV ANS )·········ORTIZ ······~ GIB BS )········ ·PATTIN SON·· v -- CUL VER)········ P ERRY······ _L. -- NYBORG) ········PR IE ST····· v -- AN THONY) • • • • • · ·RI LEY· • • • · • ~ -- BR I GGS) .• ••••• -R IMA ·······~ -- YOUN G) .•••• ··.·ROGET· · · · • • _l.L -- TH OM) •..••..•• ·ROTH · · · · · • • --\,.L -- DO ST AL) .•• • • • • ·RY Cl<O FF · · · • ~ -- l\'/EL S H) ...•• ·.··SALTARE LLI • ~ -- RI LEY) ...•. •·• -SC HMIT·····~== WELS H) ...•.••.. SHARP ...••• ~ __ PATTINSON) ..••• SHENKMAN ••• ~ __ (H OY T) ......... SM ITH •••.•• V""" (ADL ER) ....•••.• STANT ON ••.• ~ -- AD LER) ...••••.• SVA LSTA D •.. ~ -- BROWN) •..•••.•. SYLVIA ..•.• ~ -- GAIDO) ..•••..•• VA RDOU LI S •. ~ == \'l'INTERS) ....•.. VELAS QUEZ .• ~ FRIED) .....••.. WEDAA ..•••• ~ == (PATTIN SO N) .•.•. WI EDER .•••• ~ (V ELASQUEZ)···· ·~H NTERS · · • · -l,....:::::::' ==- OTHERS HA RPER •.•. ·-- SYLVE ST ER •• __ LEl'/J S .•.••• __ CLA RKE ••••• __ BR O\~N .••••• __ WO ODR UFF ••• __ HOHENER ..•• __ H O l~ARD .•.•• __ HU NT ••.•••. __ KEITH .••••• __ KENNEY ••.•. __ LYN CH •••••• __ MADDOX ....• _·_ MAR TI NSON •• PI ERSA LL .•• ST EVENS .••• TRAVERS •••• -,. MEETIN G DATE April 1 2, 1 978 T I ME 7:30 ~ DI STRICTS 1,2,3 ,5 ,6,7 & 11 ~.;..., DI STRIC T 1 l\·JE LSH) •...•.•. SHARP ..•••.. / ---- RI LEY) •..•••.. ANTHONY · .•• ·~ ---- ORTJ z ) ....•.•. EVf1NS. · • · • • ·-:-r----- BR I GGS) .. · •.. ·R I MA· .. ····.~ ---- DISTR IC T 2 FR IE p) .....••• WEDAA · .•••. ·~ ---- HOYT) .....•.•• SMI TH ..•..• ·------ R I LE Y) ......•. et:AfttC •.• • • • .L_ ---- COOP E~) ••.•••. Fo x .......•. ~V . ---- ROGET) ••..•.•. GRAHAM . . . . • . ---- DE JE SUS) ..•. -HOLT ..... ••• ---- \•/E LLS) ....•.•• HOUSTON..... ___ _ EVANS) ......•. o~TIZ · ..•.•. L ____ _ CU LVER) ....•.• Pt RR Y ..•••.. -V-___ _ TH OM) ..•.•..• -ROTH ·· •. ·•• .::z ___ _ ADLER) ....•••. STANTON .•.•• __iL_ ___ _ (WINT ERS) .•..•. VEL AS QUEZ .•• --!,..L ___ _ DI STR ICT 3 (A DLER) •.....•• SVALSTAD •..• ./ · LACAYO) .•...•. HUD SON .•.••• --;;;r----- P ERR Y) ....•..• CULVER...... ---- COOPER) ...... -GAMB I N/-\. · · · • ---- BLACKMAN) ...•• GRAY ·· ..•• ·. ---- GR I FFl N) •.•••• ~....... ---- vlE I SHAUPT) •.•. MIL LER...... ---- FI NLAYSON) .••• OL SO N ..••. ··~==== EVANS) ......•. ORTIZ ...•.•. V NYBORG) •.•.••. PRIEST .... ··~ ---- YOUN G) ••....•. ROGE T....... ---- THO M) •..••.••. ROTH •.. 1 . ·· · == == RI LEY ) .....••. &eHttrT Orl... .. ·~ BROWN ) .•.••••. SY LVI A. ·e_· · · v ---- PATTINSON) ...• ~.() ••• ·...LL_==== VE LASQUEZ) •..• vii NTERS .•.• ·-4.L-___ _ DI STRI CT 5 (D OSTA L)······ ·MC I NNIS····:&:---- (ANT HONY)····· ·RI LEY ······· ---- (I'l l LLI AMS) ·····DOSTAL ······ ---- DISTR ICT 6 !BR IG GS ) •.•.... RI MA ...••.• ~ ---- DO STAi-) ••..... RYCKOFF .... __ -- RI LE Y) ••.•.•.. ANTHONY.... ---- DJ STRJ CT 7. · ~OSTAT ....•• ·BARR ETT.: •. '*~ --AIDO • • · · · • · ·VA RDOULI S • · · ___ _ !LE Y • · · · · • • ·CL MK · · · · · • • ___ _ RT I Z ········EVAN S ······· !HUT CHJ SON) · • • ·GL. OCKNt:R • • • ·~ == == \'/EL Stl) ········SALTARELLI ·· ___ _ HOY T )········ ·SM I TH······· ___ _ DISTRICT 11 SJ ....... ·PATT I NSON .• ··~ I NSON) ····S HENKMAN···· . ·. --== y) .••..•• ·-&e-HMTI. . . . . . c--- DISTR ICT 8 (LA\'I RB_(KE) · · · · ·ED\·/ARDS • ....:...:_ ·-____ · II ~\._ BRAND ...••• ~ (CLARK ) · • ··RI LEY···· · • • == == Ll-11-78 J O I NT BOf1RDS RI LEY) .--:-. • · • • • • ANTllONY • · • • V" __ DOST A ~)········ BARRET T···· V'" __ ~1~~~~) : : : : : : : : : ~B~~~'~: : : : : 1T @ I'l l LLI AMS )····· ·DO S T A L·····~ O!H J Z) .....•... EVA NS ······ V-:- COOPER)········ FOX········ V--- CO OPER )········ GAMl3 I NA ···· vr--- HUTCH I SON ) · · · • • 6 1!.'eE IO<E R • · · .IL__ -- ROGE T) · • · · · · • • ·GRAHAM· · · • • ~ -- 13LAC KMA N)····· ·GRAY ·······~ -- DE JESU S)······ HOLT······· ~ -- \·~E LL S)········· HOUSTON···· -V:--- LACAYO)······· ·HU DSON·····~ -- DO S TAL)······· ·MC INNIS··· -- (G R I FF IN)······ ../Jiiii • · · · · · · · -- (\'/EI SHAUPT) ·····M ILLER····· l F I NL/\YSOI~) ·····OLSON······ -- EVANS)· -·······ORTIZ······ -- GIBBS)········ ·PATTI NSON ·· -- CULVER)········ PERRY······ L_ -- ~NY BORG) .. ······PR I ES T ····· v -- ANTHONY)······ ·RI LEY······ J2'.::: -- BRIGGS) ..•••.•. RJMA· · · • • · • _L_ -- (YOUNG) ..••. ••· ·ROGET······~ -- lTHOM) ....•...... ROTH· · • · · · • 1/ -- DOST AL).······ ·RYC KOFF · · • · g.c · l'/ELS H) ..••. ····SALTAREL LI · ~) .... ·····SCHM IT ·····~ -- (\'/E LSH) ......•.• SHARP ... . . • -- (PATTINS ON) ••••. SHENKMAN ... == ~HOYT) ......... SMITH ..... . ADLER) .•..•.•. ,STANTON . • . • -- !ADLER) .•..••••• SVA LST AD .•• L/' -- BROWN) •.•.••••. SYLV I A ..•.• --;:;?" -- GAIDO) •.•...••. VARDOULIS .• ~-- \'/I NTERS) ....... VELAS QUEZ .. -- FR I ED) .•..•••.• WEDAA ...... -- (oPATTHlS0!¢1 ..... W-I ED ER .0.K . ~- (VEL ASQ UE Z)···· ·\'/INTE RS ···· 7.Z_-- OTHERS HARPER .•.• ·-- SYLVESTER •. __ LE\'/IS ....• ·-- CL ARKE ...•• __ BR O\m .••••• __ ~lO ODR U FF ..• __ HOHENER ...• __ HO l'/ARD .•.•• __ HUNT ••....• __ KEITH ....•. __ KENN EY •.•.• __ LYNCH ..... . MADDOX ..•.• __ MA RT I NSO N .• PIER SA LL •.. ST EVEN S .••• TRAVERS •••. MEETING DATE April 12, 1978 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS· 1.2,3,5,6, 7 & 11 1.-N-lJ . u -DIS!RICT l ·' --._ I . . -'~WELSH) •••••••• SHARP· ••••• ·------ ·. RI LEY) •••• ••• ·ANTHONY •• ···-./----- ORTI z) •••••••• EVANS· •• ••• ._L_ ---- BRIGGS) •••••• ·RIMA·· •• ····-"----- DISTRICT 2 FRIEP) ••••••• -WEDAA· •••••• _I_ --__ HOYT) ••••••••• SM I TH • •••• • ._L_ ---- RI LEY) •••••••• ~,\RI~ •••••• _L_ ---- COOPER) ••••••• FOX· • • •••• • ._.;_ ---- ROGET) •••••••• GRAHAM ••••• ·+ ---- DE JESUS) ••••• HOLT·· •••• ··------ WELLS) •••••••• HOUSTON ••••• _./_ --__ EVANS) ••••• • •• ORTIZ· •• ••• ._L_ __ -- CULVER) •• · ••••• PERRY· •••• • ._.1 ____ _ THOM) .•••••••• ROTH·· •• ····-"-___ _ ADLER) •••••••• STANTON. • • • • ./ ) -r--WI NTERS •••••• VELASQUEZ •• ·--___ _ DISTRICT 3 ADLER •••••••• SVALSTAD •••• _J_ ·--__ LACAYO) ••••••• HUDSON •••• • • ./ PERRY) •••••••• CULVER ••• • •• -r ---- COOPER) ••••••• GAMBINA· • • • .--r ---- BLACKMAN) ••••• GRAY·······.--,;:----- GRIFFIN) ••• •• ·MEYER······ .--r----- WEISHAUPT) •••• MILLER ••• ··.-/----- FINLAYSON) •••• OLSON ••• ···.--;::;---_ -- EVANS) •••••••• ORTIZ ••••••• -.1----- . NYBORG) ••••••• PR I EST •••••• -J----- YOUNG) •••••••• ROGET. •••••• -.;----- THOM) ••••••••• ROTH ••• -n. ~ .-./-== == RI LEY) •••••••• SCHMIT.'-'~~ •• --r BROWN) •••••••• SYLVIA •••••• ---r ---- PATTINSON) •••• \•/IEDER.Q~ •• -...;----- VELASQUEZ) •••• WINTERS ••••• ~ == == ·. DISTRICT 5 ~DOSTAL)······ ·MC INNIS··· ._I_ --__ ANTHONY)····· ·RILEY······._ . .;_ ---- WILLIAMS)···· ·DOSTAL······-"'----- DISTRICT 6 ~BRIGGS) ••••••• RIMA ••••••• -L----- DOSTA[._) ••••••• RYCKOFF •••• ~ ---- RI LEY) •••••••• ANTHONY •••• ---.:£__ ---- DISTRICT 7. DOSTAr ·······BARRETT····.__!_ ---- GA IDO • • • • • • • • VARDOULI S • • ._j_ ___ _ R I LEV • • • • • • • • C l,.A.R..K..a. • • • • • ._-.;_ __ -- 0 RT I Z ········EVANS······· / HUTCH I SON)··· ·GLOGIH!ER • • • • ./ == == WELSti) ········SALTARELLI • • v HOYT) • ········SMITH······· ,/ == == DISTRICT 11 GIBBS ········PATTINSON··.__!__ ___ _ PATTINSON)··· ·SHE~~Kt~/\N A_".L. ·~ ___ _ RILEY)······· ·SCl-Mll • .!.~ ·-·-./· ____ _ DISTRICT 8 (LAWRENCEJ· ····EDWARDS·····--___ _ BRAND· • • • • • • (CLARK) • • • • • • • ·RI LEY· • • • • • .-== == 4-11-78 JOINT BOARDS RI LEY) • • • • • • • • ·ANTHONY· • • • __!___ __ DOSTA~)········BARRETT···· _:{____ ---- RILEY • ········CLARK······~ -- PERRY • • • • • • • • ·CULVER· • • • • __£_ WI LLlf\MS) • • • • ··DOSTAL. • • •• ~ L/ ro& I ORTIZ) • • • • • • • ··EVANS·· • • • • ./ COOPER) • • • • • • • ·FOX·· • • • • • • -./--- COOPER)······· ·GAMBINA· • • • -..;--- HUTCHJSON) • • • • ·6LQGl<NEfr. • • ii == ROGET)·········GRAHAM····· J BLACKMAN)····· ·GRAY······· --Z:--- DE JESUS)····· ·HOLT······· -r -- \"/ELLS) • • • • • • • • ·HOUSTON· • • • -./--- LACAYO)········ HUDSON····· ./ == DOSTAL)········MC INNIS··· / GRIFFIN)·······~····· -r -- WEISHAUPT)···· ·MILLER·····~ --. !FINLAYSON)·····OLSON······ ()._., == EVANS)········ ·ORTIZ······ _.1 __ _ GIBBS)·········PATTINSON·· ~ CULVER)········ PERRY······~ -- NYBORG) • • • • • • • •PR I EST • • • • • -11--- ANTHONY) .. ······RI LEY· • • • • • -./--- BRIGGS) ••••• ·.·RI MA·· • • • • ·--:;---- YOUNG) •••• •••• ·ROGET······~ -- THOM). ••••• • • • ·ROTH· • • • • • • ---:/ -- DOST A~) ••• • • • • ·RYCKOFF • • • • -.,,--- RI LEY •••• • • • • ·SCHMIT· • • • • ./ !WELSH ••••••••• SALTARELLI· ~ == WELSH) ••••••••• SHARP •••••• -./--- PATTINSON} ••••• SHENKMAN ••• -.,/--- HOYT) ••••••••• SMITH •••••• -,,,--- ADLER ••••••••• SVALSTAD ••• -.,,--- ADLER~ ••••••••• STANTON •••• ~ -- BROWN ••••••••• SYLVIA ••••• -.. /--- GAIDO ••••••••• VARDOULI S •• -,"--- WINTERS) ••••••• VELASQUEZ •• -,,;--- ( FRIEDL •••••••• WEDAA •••••• ~ -- PATTINSON) ••••• WIEDER ••••• -../--- (VELASQUEZ)···· ·WINTERS···.· -T - OTHERS . / HARPER •••• ·-- SYLVESTER •• _./_ LEWIS ••••• ·--L- CLARKE ••••• _,,;_ BROWN •••••• ....lL_ WOODRUFF ••• _y_ HOHENER ••• ·-- HOWARD •••• ·-- HUNT ••••••• _:!__ KEITH •••••• __;{_ KENNEY ••••• __ LYNCH •••••• _L_ MADDOX ••••• MART I NSON •• == PI ERSALL ••• __ STEVENS •••• TRAVERS •••• -- f I l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, 'CALIFORNIA MINUTES Of THE REGULAR MEETUtG OH APRIL 12J 1978 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS A VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL ~ regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,· S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California was held at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary.reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, ~ 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: District No. 1: District No. 2: District No. 3: District No. 5: District No. 6: District No. 7: District No. 11: ACTIVE DIRECTORS X ·James Sharp, Chairman --x--Philip Anthony, Chairman pro tern -X--Vernon Evans X Kerm Rima X Henry Wedaa, Chairman -X--Don Smith, Chairman pro tern -Ralph Clark X Donald Fox · X Beth Graham X Donald Holt X Bernard Houston X-David Ortiz Y-Bob Perry Y-Donald Roth Y-Roger Stanton Y-Louis Velasquez x Bernie Svalstad, Chairman x Donald Hudson, Chairman pro x Norman Culver x Sal Gambina Russell Gray x Don-Griffin x Harry Miller Richard Olson x David Ortiz x Alan Priest x Earl Roget x-Donald Roth y-Laurence Schmit x-Charles Sylvia x-Harriett Wieder x-Duane Winters x Don Mclnnis, Chairman x Thomas Riley, Chairman pro x Milan Dostal X Kerm Rima, Chairman tern tern X Paul Ryckoff, Chairman pro tern X Philip Anthony X Pete Barrett, Chairman X Bill Vardoulis, Chairman pro tern -Ralph Clark X Vernon Evans Francis Glockner Y-Donald Safrarelli Y-Don Smith X Ron Pattinson, Chairman X Ron Shenkman, Chairman pro tern X Laurence Schmit . -2- ALTERNATE DIRECTORS Ralph Welsh ~-Thomas Riley David Ortiz Robert Briggs Irwin Fried Robert Hoyt ~Thomas Riley Sam Cooper Earl Roget George DeJesus James Wells Vernon Evans Norman Culver W. J. Thom Marvin Adler Duane Winters Marvin Adler Otto Lacayo Bob Perry Sam Cooper Thomas Blackman __ Stanley Meyer Martha Weishaupt Bruce Finlayson Vernon Evans Ronald Nyborg Robin Young W. J. Thom Thomas Riley -.---William Brown Ron Pattinson Louis Velasquez Milan Dostal Philip Anthony Ray Williams Robert Briggs Milan Dostal Thomas Riley Milan Dostal Mary Ann Gaido -X-Thomas Riley David Ortiz -X-Elvin Hutchison -Ralph Welsh --Robert Hoyt Norma Gibbs Ron Pattinson Thomas Riley 4/12/78 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, Rita Brown, Hilary Baker, Janet Conatser, Jim Fatland and Dennis Reid • Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Gordon Cooper, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Gail Lynch and George Rach * * * * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, & 7 Receive and file excerpts re Board Appointment That the minute excerpts frQm the following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates be received and ordered filed; and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: City District No. Active Alternate Brea 3 Sal Gambina Sam Cooper Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin Stanley F. Meyer Cypress 3 Donald G. Hudson Otto J. Lacayo Fountain Valley 3 Bernie Svalstad Marvin P. Adler Fullerton 2 Louis Velasquez Duane Winters 3 Duane Winters Louis Velasquez La Habra 3 Earl C. Roget Robin Young La Palma 3 Alan ·I. Priest Ronald Nyborg Stanton 3 Harry L. Miller Martha V. Weishaupt Tustin 1 James B. Sharp Ralph Welsh, Jr. 7 Donald Saltarelli Ralph Welsh, Jr. Yorba Linda 2 Henry W. Wedaa Irwin M. Fried DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting he-ld March 8, 1978, be approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1978, and the special meeting held March 30, 1978, be approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes ·That the minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1978, be approved, as mailed. ·DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1978, be approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1978, be approved, as mailed. -3- \._) 4/12/78 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1978, be approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1978, be approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Directors Houston and Hudson to ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager Following an introduction of newly seated Directors, Joint Chairman Saltarelli called a meeting of the Executive Committee for April 26, 1978, at 5:30 p.m. and invited attend and participate in the discussions. The General Manager welcomed newly seated Directors and informed them that the staff would be planning an orientation meeting for new Board members including a tour of the treatment facilities sometime after the regular May meeting. He also advised Directors that the date for dedication of the new SO MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 had not yet been fixed. We are awaiting confirmation from the Environmental Protection Agency as to when the Administrator will be able to attend. Mr. Harper reported that the West Coast ocean dischargers were still working vigorously on revisions to the proposed secondary treatment waiver regulations which had been drafted by the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA has taken a hard line on the waiver provisions and the ocean dischargers are attempting to provide input to Congressional members and staff and EPA in an attempt to obtain a reasonable set of regulations. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel briefly reported on the information which had been supplied to Directors regarding the impact of the Jarvis-Gann Tax Initiative on the Districts' fiscal position and advised that a resolution would be drafted for considera- tion by the Boards at the next regular meeting in the event the Directors wish to take a position on.the initiative. · ALL DISTRICTS Approving optional method of filing Disclosure Statements re Conflict of Interest Code The General tounsel reported that pursuant to the Directors' request he had reviewed the feasibility of revising the Districts' Conflict of Interest Code reporting procedures to enable Directors to submit copies of the disclosure statements filed with the respective entity which they represent (ie., citY, sanitary district) to satisfy the Districts' report- ing-requirements. He observed that the major problem revolves around the fact that the territorial jurisdictions of the political bodies involved are generally not the same. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning possibl~ alternative methods of satisfying the Districts' reporting requirements -4- 4/12/78 by filing modified copies of forms used to comply with the filing re- quirements of their respective entities, after which it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Directors be allowed the option of submitting modified disclosure statements to satisfy the Districts' reporting requirements, in form approved by the General Counsel, with a cover letter stating that said statements also cover all reporting requirements applicable to the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Claims Fund Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Moved, seconded and duly carried: That payment of Districts' claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: March 14, 1978 $ 126,560.43 14,043.57 $ 140,604.00 March 28, 1978 $ 155,887.66 755,686.74 $ 911,574.40 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-4" and "C-1" through "C-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Dostal requested that his abstention from voting on Warrant No. 41081 be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 2 Ratification of payment of claims in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Moved, seconded and duly carried: That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified March 14, 1978 March 28, 1978 $ 214.50 $ 8,205.07 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-1" and "D", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Ratification of payment of claims in the total amounts so indicated: -5- Moved, seconded and duly carried: That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified "..,_/ 4/12/78 Fund March 14, 1978 March 28, 1978 Operating Fund $ 249.00 $ 2~078.61 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 4,202.78 Facilities Revolving Fund 1,073.50 $ 5,525.28 $ 2,078.61 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-1" and "D", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Ratification of payment of claims in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Moved, seconded and duly carried: That payment of District claims'on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified March 14, 1978 March 28, 1978 $ 1,595.31 $ 87.75 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-2" and "D", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Ratification of payment of claims in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Operating Fund Moved, seconded and duly carried: That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified March 14, 1978 March 28, 1978 $ 991. 00 $ 1,044.37 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-2" and "D", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Specification No. A-088 That the bid tabulation and reconunendation for purchase of Two (2) 9-Yard Dump Trucks, Specification No. A-088, be received and ordered filed, and that said purchase be awarded to Trans West Ford, in the amount of $30,405.16. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Specification No. A-090 That the bid tabulation and recommendation for purchase of Four (4) Personnel Carriers and Three (3) Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-090, be received and ordered -6- 4/12/78 filed; and that purchase of Personnel Carriers be awarded to Taylor-Dunn Company, in the amount of $8,087.76; and purchase of Cargo Carriers be awarded to Nordco Industrial Products, in the amount of $6,833.82. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 re Job No. I-IR That Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications, be approved. A copy of these addenda are on file in the office of the Secretary. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract for Job No. I-IR That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-56, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Contract for Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Job No. I-IR, to Triad Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $371,173.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 re Job No. PW-064A That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and speci- fications for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, providing for miscellaneous technical clarifications be approved. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Job No. PW-064A That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-57, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, to U. S. Equipment Co., Inc. in the amount of $43,276.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Job No. PW-065 That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-58, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-065, to Production Steel Company, Inc. in the amount of $14,950.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing General Manager to award purchase order contracts for Electric Motor and Electrical Switch Gear Centrifuge in an amount not to Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-59, authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and award purchase order contracts for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 exceed $14,000 including tax and freight, and ~ -7- 4/12/78 for Electrical Switch Gear for said motor in an amount not to exceed $7,000 including tax and freight. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -......,,; ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 re Job No. E-092 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and speci- fications for Acquisition of Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. E-092, providing for miscel- laneous technical clarifications, be approved. A copy of this addendum is on file in the office of the Secretary. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, Seconded and duly carried: Awarding Specification No. E-092 That the bid tabulation and recommendation for Acquisition of Gas Mixing Compressors at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Specification No. E-092, be received and ordered filed; and that said specification be awarded to Compressor Service, in the amount of $114,570.00. ALL DISTRICTS . Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 re Job No. J-13-1 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, granting a time extension of 63 calendar days to the contract with A & T Construction Company, Inc. for delays due to inclement weather be approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. J-13-1 as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-60, accepting Shops and Warehouse Sewer Lateral, Job No. J-13-1, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. J-6-lE as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-61, accept).ng New Roof Hatches at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lE, as complete; authorizing execu- tion of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 re Job No. P2-23-l That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, authorizing an addition of $14,089.74 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for miscellaneous additional work and materials and granting a time extension of 51 calendar days due to inclement weather, be approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- 4/12/78 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No~ 3 re Job No. P2-23-3 That Change' Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Electrical Reliability ~ for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, authorizing an addition of $2,078.80 to the contract with C. H. Leavell & Company for electrical duct work and additional backfill and granting a time extension of 65 calendar days for additional excavation due to inclement weather, be approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Stop Notice re Job No. P2-23-3 That the Stop Notice submitted by Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Inc. dba Huntington. Beach Equipment Rentals.in the amount of $2,966.56, against C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Stop Notice re Job No. PW-055-1 That the Stop Notice submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. in the amount of $10,973.00 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 77-166 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution l J No. 78-62, amending Positions and Salaries ~ Resolution No. 77-166, as amended, decreasing the salary range for Chief of Industrial Waste from Range 1060C ($1907/2375) to Range 1060A ($1881/2342). A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Accepting proposal of SCCWRP re Secondary Treatment Waiver application it was moved, seconded and duly Following a brief discussion regarding the propose'd application for waiver of s'econdary treatment requirements in view of the posi- tion taken by the Environmental Protection Agency with regard to the waiver regulations, carried: · That the proposal from Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for services in connection with initial preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements pursuant to recent amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $15,000, be received, ordered filed and accepted. ALL DISTRICTS It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting proposal of John Carollo Engineers re Secondary That the proposal from John Carollo Engineers Treatment Waiver application for services in connection with initial preparation of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements pursuant to recent amendments to the Federal l.._) Water Pollution Control Act, on a per diem fee basis for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,500, be received, ordered filed and accepted. -9- '"'-" 4/12/78 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 1 to agreement with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co. re Phase I Revenue Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-79, approving Addendum No. 1 to agree- ment with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company for Phase I revenue program work, providing for a change in the payment provision to authorize release of retained monies due to delays beyond the consultant's control caused by recent regulation revisions. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Executive Committee Report ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for design of solids handling and dewatering·facilities ALL DISTRICTS Adopting resolution re SCAG 208 Area-Wide Planning Study Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Committee, dated April 5, 1978, be received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Conunittee be authorized to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for design of solids handling and dewatering facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. Following a brief discussion regarding the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-63, relative to the SCAG 208 (Area-Wide Planning Study for the South Coast area) draft Early Action Program Design--Management of Sewage Sludge of the San Diego Creek Watershed Area. A certified. copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting resolution re SCAG 208 Milestone Report That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-64, relative to the SCAG 208 (Area- Wide Planning Study for the South Coast area) Milestone Report. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made ~a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving continued repre- sentation in CASA by retiring Director Winn Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the continued representation by re- tiring Director Don Winn in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies be approved replaced through the Association's annual meeting in August, 1978, or until by Board action upon reconunendation of the Executive Committee. Director Houston requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -10- 4/12/78 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing reimbursement of expenses for retiring That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution Director Winn re repre-No. 78-65, authorizing payment of fees and V sentation in CASA reimbursement of expenses incurred in con- nection with District representation in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies by retiring Director Winn. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Houston requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Stop Notice re Job No. P2-23-3 That the Stop Notice submitted by Beacon Investment Co. dba Crenshaw Lumber Company in the amount of $1,544.84 against C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Stop Notice re Job No. -P2-23-3 That the Stop Notice submitted by Concrete Tile & Anchor Corp. in the amount of $10,179.56 against C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3, be received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., April 12, 1978. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 re Contract No. 3-lR-3 That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing. a deduction of $104.68 from the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation to replace 25 sacks of cement borrowed from Districts' warehouse due to unavaila- bility of said material, be approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 re Contract No. 3-lR-3 That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $481.50 from the contract with F. B. Cook Corpo.ration and granting a time extension of 100 calendar days due to delays in procurement of plastic cement and inclement weather, be approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -11- 4/12/78 DISTRICT·3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 3-lR-3 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-71-3, accepting Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 re Contract No. 3-22-1 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, authorizing a change in pipe size from 45 inch to 48 inch R.C.P. and changing the starting point of the project from Orangethorpe and Knott Avenue to Orangethorpe and Western Avenue, at no additional cost to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc., be approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Initial Study re Contract No. 3-13-1 and authorizing staff to prepare negative declaration and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Initial Study re evaluation of environmental impacts relative to the Westside Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, be received and ordered filed; FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be authorized to prepare a Negative Declaration and give notice thereof in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:06 p.m., April 12, 1978. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Approving plans and speci- fications re Contract No. 5-8-R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-72, approv.ing plans and specifications for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, and ratifying advertising for bids received on March 30, 1978. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 re Contract No. 5-8-R That Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit 5, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, indicating the requirements of the State Highway Encroachment Permit, be approved. Copies of these addenda are on file in the office of the Secretary. -12- 4/12/78 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 5-8-R That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-73, to receive and file bid tabula-~ tion and recommendation and awarding contract for Slip-Lining of Trunk B, Unit S, Rocky Point to Lido Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-8-R, to Rodding-Cleaning . Machines, Inc. in the amount of $216,114.25. A certified copy of this resolu- tion is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m., April 12, 1978. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the· meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m., April 12, 1978. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 8 - Tract 8725, Harbor Ridge That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 78-74-5, ordering annexation of 1.095 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity adjacent to the San Joquin Hills Reservoir in the City of Newport Beach, Annexation No. 8 - Tract 8725, Harbor Ridge Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Authorizing sale of pipe to District No. 2 for Orange Sub-Trunk Replacement Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the sale of pipe previously purchased under Contract No. 5-20A to County Sanitation District No. 2 for use in replacement of the Orange $26.00 per Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing, at the current market price of foot be,authorized. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:08 p.m., April 12, 1978. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 65 -Schymick Annexation That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 78-75-7, ordering annexation of .472 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan Heights area, Annexation No. 65 -Schymick Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 10th Sewer Maintenance District). A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -13- .. 4/12/78 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 68 -Frantz Annexation That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 78-76-7, ordering annexation of .4001 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of Meads Drive and Morada Drive in the City of Orange, Annexation No. 68 -Frantz Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 73 -Tract No. 9271 That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 78-77-7, ordering annexation of 10 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Bent Tree Lane, Annexation No. 73 -Tract No. 9271 to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District). A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive, file and refer request to staff re Pro- posed Annexation No. 80 - Tract No. 9472 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from G. L. Lewis Company, dated March 13, 1978, for annexation of 7.082 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of Santiago Canyon Road and Jamestown Way in the City of Orange, Proposed Annexation No. 80 -Tract No. 9472, be received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation. DISTRICT 7 Accepting proposal of OPA for satisfaction of debt re Annexation No. 51 proceedings The Chair recognized Mr. George Rach, representing the Orange Park Association, who presented the Board with a written proposal from the Association to satisfy their obligation to the District in con- nection with the recent concurrent bond authorization and Annexation No. 51 proceedings. The Association proposed to pay $2,500 within thirty days and the balance in two annual installments. Mr. Rach apologized to the Board for the delay in settling the obligation and then tendered a check in the amount of $2,500 as the initial payment set forth in the proposal. Following an expression of appreciation to Mr. Rach and the Association for their good faith, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the proposal of Orange Park Association, dated April 11, 1978, to satisfy the Association's debt to the District, -be received, ordered filed and accepted. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment_ Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The· Chairman then declared· the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., April 12, 1978. -14- 4/12/78 DISTRICT 2 ·Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 17 -Country Hill Road That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 78-66-2, ordering annexation ~ of 1.75 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Ifill -- and Via Vista Drive in the City of Anaheim, Annexation No. 17 -Country llill Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving agreement with City of Orange re mainte- nance of Stacey Lane Pump Station Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-67-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with the City of Orange for maintenance of Stacey Lane Pumping Station (Tract No. 9713), in form approved by the General Counsel. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing negotiated purchase and installation of protective covers re Contract Nos. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to negotiate with Rewes-Schock for purchase and instal- lation of seven fiberglass protective covers inside manholes of Santa Ana Inter- ceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, and Reaches 6, 7 & 8, Contract No. 2-14-5, for flood hazard protection, for an amount not to exceed $9,000. DISTRICT 2 Ratification of General Manager's action re flood damages to Orange and Olive Sub-Trunks Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of the General Manager in filing a Notice of Interest re flood-caused damage to the Orange and Olive Sub-Trunks Santa Ana River Crossings with the State and Federal Disaster Office be ratified. DISTRICT 2 Approving agreement with Yorba Linda County Water District re deferral of Annexation No. 21 fees No. 21 -Upper K Ranch Annexation certified copy of this resolution minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-68-2, approving agreement with. Yorba Linda County Water District for deferral of annexation fees in connection with Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A is attached hereto and made a part of these Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with Broadmoor homes, Inc. and That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution City of Yorba Linda re defer-No. 78-69-2, approving agreement with ral of Annexation No. 21 fees Broadmoor Homes, Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda for deferral of annexation fees· in connection with Annexation No. 24 -Tract No. 9813 to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ~ -15- 4/12/78 DISTRICT 2 Receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc .. request- ing deferral of payment of Annexation No. 28 fees Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1978, requesting defer- ral of payment of fees on approximately 53 dedicated to the Aimexa ti on No. 7 filed. acres of permanent open space that will be County of Orange (Proposed Annexation No. 28 -Anaheim Hills to County Sanitation District No. 2) be received and ordered DISTRICT 2 Receive and file letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., request- ing Annexation No. 28 acreage fees be spread over four-year period Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1978, requesting that annexation acreage fees in the amount of $254,472.09 on approximately 188 acres of territory re Proposed Annexation No. 28 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to County Sanitation District No. 2, be spread over a four-year period, be received and ordered filed. Director Perry requested that his vote in opposition of the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 2 Consideration of request for deferral of Annexation No.28 tees Following a brief discussion regarding the location of proposed Annexation No. 28 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 7 to· County Sanitation District No. 2, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That consideration of the proponent's request for deferral of payment of fees on a portion of the property and payment of fees on the balance over a four- year period be deferred to the next regular meeting of the Board. DISTRICT 2 Adopting Resolution commending John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for emergency repairs to Orange Sub-Trunk Following a report regarding the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing re- placement, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 78-70-2 commending John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for their outstanding work in connection with emergency repairs to the Orange Sub-Trunk Santa Ana River Crossing. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Fixing time and place for hearing re Draft EIR for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan the Brea City Hall. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the time and place for a public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Carbon Canyon Facilities Plan be fixed for 7:30 p.m., June 21, 1978, at -16- 4/12/78 DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board· of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:22 p.m., April 12, 1978. -17- of Directors Districts Nos. 1, 11 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCii 14, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 40908 40909 "...,./ 4 0910 40911 40912 40913 40914 40915 40916 40917 40918 40919 40920 40921 40922 40923 40924 40925 40926 40927 40928 40929 40930 40931 40932 40933 40934 ~ 40935 40936 40937 40938 40939 40940 40941 40942 40943 40944 40945 40946 40947 40948 40949 40950 40951 40952 40953 40954 40955 40956 40957 40958 40959 '-140960 40961 40962 40963 Allied Colloids, Poly Chemicals Aljac Supply Company, Small Hardware American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Society For Testing, Water Testing Manual American Standard, Gaskets Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Line Repairs The Anchor Packing Company, Compressor Parts Andrews Hardware & Metal Company, Cam Chain Void Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Barksdale Controls Division, Pump Parts BC Industrial Supply, Rope Benz Engineering, Inc., Air Compressor Blue Diamond Materials, Patch Mix W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage C & R Reconditioning Company, Rebuild Cam Shaft CS Company, Valves Clark Dye Hardware, Small Tools Coast Marine Tank, Dip Tank Coit Drapery Service, Drapery Cleaning College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber William Collins Mobile Home, Relocate Inspection Trailer Compressor Products, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Controlco, Valves Cook Drafting Supply, Drafting Supplies Cooper Energy Services, Engine Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Costa Mesa Datsun, Truck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water C. R. Davis Supply Company, Steam Cleaner Deco, Electrical Supplies Diamond Core Drilling Company, Drilling Nick DiBenedetto, Travel Expense Double F Supply Company, Small Hardware Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies James R. Fatland, Seminar Registration Fischer & Porter Company, Flow Meters Fisher Scientific Company, Pump Parts Clifford A. Forkert, Aerial Photos City of Fountain Valley, Water Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies Frost Engineering Service Company, Operating Supplies Frye Sign Company, Signs General Telephone Company, Phone Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Pump Parts Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts Hertz Car Leasing Division, Car Lease Isco Company c/o Hoffman Company, Freight Charge Hollywood Tire Of Orange, Tires Hotel Durant, AMSA Meeting Expense "A-1" AMOUNT $ 20,280.00 300.47 278.91 37.88 65.37 3,383.30 116. 23 137.85 .00 459.60 490.21 302.74 1,169.47 11. 85 19.95 580.00 170.91 74.17 90.10 96.00 68 .16 275.00 515.84 465.09 1,457.28 788.31 59.09 125.74 383.72 6.00 17.82 1,483.00 46.00 120.57 110.88 150.00 208.78 108.44 726.01 100.00 4' 001. 59 94.37 700.00 443.30 175.24 227.29 47.70 3,470.20 69.06 4,352.41 48.16 21.35 819.23 10.19 231.54 152.15 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 14, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 40964 40965 40966 40967 40968 40969 40970 4097·1 40972 40973 40974 40975 40976 40977 40978 40979 40980 40981 40982 40983 40984 40985 40986 40987 40988 40989 40990 40991 40992 40993 40994 40995 40996 40997 40998 40999 41000 41001 41002 41003 41004 41005 41006 41007 41008 41009 41010 41011 41012 41013 41014 41015 41016 41017 41018 41019 House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water ICN Life Sciences Group, Water Sampling Inland Empire Equipment Company, Service Manual International Business Machine, Typewriter Elements Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Bryon Jackson Pump Division, Pump Parts Jims Mobile Home Transport, Door Adjustment Kaman Bearing & Supply, Couplings Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, ·wel"ding Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Bearings Kingmann-White, Inc., Office Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Rental· Lanco Engine Services, Inc., Engine Parts Larry's Building Materials, Inc., Small Hardware Leonards Carpet Service, Carpet Installation Lewco Electric Company, Starter Repair Ray E. Lewis, Travel Expense Lifecom-Safety Service Supply, First Aid Supplies Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lighting Livingston-Grahai:n, Concrete Mix McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Rope Mar Vac Electronics, Electrical Supplies Metropolitan Supply Company, Thermometer Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Truck Manuals Paul A. Mitchell, Employee Mileage and Travel Expense E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers National Sanitary Supply, Paper Supplies Newark Electronics, Tubing City of Newport Beach, Water Orange Coast Hardwood & Lumber, Lumber Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp Oxygen Service, Demurrage Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M.C. Patten Corporation, Vacuum Gauge Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies Pickwick Paper Products, Bin Boxes Postmaster, Postage Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Productool, Inc., Tool Box Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Randle & West, Electrical Repair Ratcliff Company, Inc., Chain Hoist The Register, Employment Ads Robbins & Meyers, Pump Parts Santa Ana Electric· Motors, Motor Repair Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Shepherd Machinery Company, Engine Repairs Sheraton-Palace Hotel, West Coast Discharge Meeting Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Southern California Edison, Power "A-2" AMOUNT $ 931.10 385. 79 \w..J 935 .88 .. 20.00 13.86 34.34 2.75 484.95 85.00 94.66 257.16 801.61 64.36 134.32 1, 056.44 1,194.82 28.14 135.95 225.60 59.37 66.35 248.43 341.77 173.15 67.20 98.51 47.02 44. 35 l._) 63.52 755.57 303.05 24.85 4.00 183.59 5.80 213.70 46.92 1,016.31 71.04 187.34 122.96 500.00 15.90 27.77 83.70 2,257.QO 721.99 233.49 129.65 543.43 938.58 2,812.46 50.00 v 487.23 28.98 39,112.43 JOINT DISTRICTS Cl.AIMS PAID MARCii 14, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41020 41021 ...,;· ·41022 41023 41024 41025 41026 41027 41028 41029 41030 41031 41032 41033 41034 41035 41036 41037 41038 41039 41040 41041 41042 41043 South Orange Supply, Pipe Fittings Southern Counties Oil Company, Fuel Stang Hyd ronics, Inc. , Pumps_ Starow Ste~l, Aluminum J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Taylor-Dunn, Truck Parts C.O. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene Travel Buffs, Air Fare Trexler Compressor, Inc., Gaskets Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts United Parcel Service, UPS Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Valve & Primer Corporation, Valve VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies John R. Waples, Odor Control Water Pollution Control Federation, Conference Registration Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Gaskets Western Analytical, Lab Service Void Russell Wold, Employee Mileage Thomas L. Woodruff, CASA Meeting Expense James Wybenga, Employee Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING ''A-3" AMOUNT $. 6.30 3,139.73 7,573.11 669.7",!, 516.55 205.53 100.91 644.00 33.11 817.30 25.09 8.86 25.20 1,490.53 224. 65 1,158.00 213.00 50.00 109.73 50.00 .00 316.14 58.90 5.40 $ 126,560.43 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 14, 1978 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT 40889 40890 40891 40892 40893 40894 40895 40896 40897 40898 40899 Basic Systems, Digital Multimeter $ 1,610. 72 7 ,471.67 423.03 360.40 1,007.75. Butier Engineering, Inc., Contract Management P2-23-l, 3, 5 & 6 Cole-Parmer Instruments, Digital Strobe Contacts Influential, Business Index Cook Drafting & Supply, Plan Holders Designed Facilities Leasing Company, Trailer Rental J-6-1 Donovan Construction Company, Release Pl-16 Gold Key Warehouse Showrooms, Office Furniture Skipper & Company, Release PW-055-1 Truck & Auto Supply Company, Spring Tester Twinning Laboratories, Testing P2-23-3 TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF "A-4" 51.00 1,431. 38 160.27 1,229.25 275.60 22.50 $ 14 ,043. 57 $140, 604. 00 -....,.,;· INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID MARCH 14, 1978 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 40900 Clifford Forkert, Legal Description TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF 40901 40902 Ameron Corporation, Use Charge Refund Southwest Regional Laboratory, Use Charge Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF . 40903 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Design Engineering 3-22-1 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING IN FAVOR OF 40904 City of Anaheim, Connection Fee Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 "B-1" $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 214.50 214.50 AMOUNT 150.00 99.00 249.00 AMOUNT $ 4,202.78 $ 4,202.78 AMOUNT $ 1,073.50 $ 5,525.28 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID MARCH 14, 1978 I DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY v WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 40905 ECOS Management Criteria, EIR, Jamboree $ 1,,595.31 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 $ 1,,595.31 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 40906 State of California, Annex 64 Processing Fee $ 95.00 40907 Litronics Industries, Use Charge Refund 896.00 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 $ 991. 00 "B-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 ·WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 41072 41073 . '~· 41074 41075 41076 41077 41078 41079 41080 41081 41082 41083 41084 41085 41086 41087 41088 41089 41090 41091 41092 41093 41094 41095 41096 41097 41098 \.,,_) 41099 41100 41101 41102 41103 41104 41105 41106 41107 41108 41109 41110 41111 41112 41113 41114 41115 41116 41117 41118 41119 41120 41121 41122 41123 ~41124 41125 41126 41127 41128 A & B Reflectorizing, Reflectors Air California, Airfare, Various Meetings Alhambra Foundry.Co. Ltd., Traffic Gate Allied Colloids, Polymer American Chemical Society, Science Manual American Lock & Supply, Inc., Padlocks The Anchor Packing Company, Boat Anchor Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Catalog Associated of Los Anglees, Electrical Supplies Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Repairs Bearing Specialty Company, Bearings John G. Bell Company, Air Cylinder Repair Bird Machine, Gear Box Repairs Bird X, Inc., Bird Repellers C & R Reconditioning Company, Camshaft Repair CS Company, Valve Gasket California Auto Collision, Inc., Truck Repair CASA, Conference Registration Fee California Lithograph Corporation, Maps Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Vacuum Service Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline and Oil Coast Insurance Agency, Auto Insurance Premium Coast Nut & Bolt, Small Hardware College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Control Specialists, Inc., Pump Parts F. B. Cook Corporation, Emergency Sewer Repair Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Batteries County Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Water DME, Inc., Freight Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies El Power Corporation, Reimbursement of Qtrly. Use Chg. O'Pymt. Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Federal Envelope Company, Stationery Fisher Controls Company, Pump Parts Flo-Systems, Pump Parts Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies and Processing City of Fullerton, Water General Electric Supply, Electrical Supplies Georgia Pacific, Chlorine General Telephone Company, Phone Golden State Fish Hatchery, Lab Research Specimens Goldenwest Fertilizer-Co~pany, Sludge Removal Harbor Radiator, Truck Repair Herrnan-Phinney-Kodmur, Compressor Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Pump Parts Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Chain Saw Rental In-Phase Electronics, Electrical International Business Machine, Typewriter Element King Bearing, Inc., Compressor Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Tissue Paper Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools Kramer Welding, Welding "C-1" AMOUNT ~ 90.26 236.70 189.21 6,240.00 52.00 307.40 388.83 33.20 776.53 233.34 254.13 161.96 64.42 3,106.09 1,083.17 225.00 20.86 137.58 200.00 713. 38 483.54 3,445.84 90.00 43.09 719.25 69.44 1,665.47 54.97 1,757.33 123.24 248.04 46.00 10.29 1,095.82 100.00 3,000.00 91.82 564.66 42.40 110.32 13.32 136.74 3,154.98 3.038.38 13.50 7,273.75 16.50 1,459.88 204.28 701. 53 153.08 21.97 17.17 176.25 198.75 61.61 2,000.00 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 •WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS• 41129 41130 41131 41132 41133 41134 41135 41136 41137 41138 41139 41140 41141 41142 41143 41144 41145 41146 41147 41148 41149 41150 41151 41152 41153 41154 41155 41156 41157 41158 41159 41160 41161 41162 41163 41164 41165 41166 41167 41168 41169 41170 41171 41172 41173 41174 41175 41176 41177 41178 41179 41180 41181 41182 41183 41184 LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform· Rental Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lifecorn-Safety Service Supply, Rainsuits Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Covers Nasco, Water Sampler NB Products, Pipe Stopper National Chemsearch, Spray Lube National Lumber Supply, Hardware and Paint Supplies Newark Electronics, Electrical Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Paper Orange County Acoustics, Remodeling Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamps Orange Paper Products, Inc., Shipping Bags • Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Pipe Fittings Oxygen Service, Demurrage Pacific Telephone Company, Phone Pak West, Cleaning Supplies Parts Unlimited, Truck Parts M. C. Patten Corporation, Pressure Gauge Pickwick Pap.er Products, Paper Supplies Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Ice Printec Corporation, Reproduction Supplies · Programmable Electric Calculators, Calculator Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Richey Electronics, Inc., Electrical Supplies Robbins & Myers, Rotor Santa Ana Electric Motors, Transformer Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Skil Corporation, Replace warrant Small Business Report, Business Magazine Subscription So. Coast Air Quality Maintenance Dist., Operating Permit Southern California Edison Company, Power South Orange Supply, Piping Southern California Gas Company, Gas Southern Counties Oil Company, Diesel Fuel Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water State Compensation Insurance Fund, Comp. Insurance The Suppliers, Small Hardware Taylor Instruments, Lab Supplies Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline US Glass, Vehicle Repair United Parcel Service, UPS Utilities Supply Company., Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Chemical Gas Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Valvate Associates, Valve Coil VWR Scientific, Plasti~ Apron ~farren McVeigh & Griffin, Research Management Study Water Sewage Works, Tech. Manual "C-2" AMOUNT $· 211.02 1,999.46 \ j 4. 51 ......... 212.42 120.72 425.96 • 34.00 440.00 121. 90 179.62 165.19 11.17 104 .13 414.72 83.28 101. 37 78.79 420.33 261. 70 138.88 742.00 274.35 277.72 31.80 107.27 158.95 29.10 195.91 '-11 80.90 1,255.50 2,899.57 421.61 1,252.86 31.67 192.37 48.00 15.00 53,346.01 6.25 4,073.21 8,745.95 230.69 14,800.00 275.85 754.59 382.22 48.65 95.86 49.31 171. 53 621.67 115.11 109.01 v 19.24 187 .;SO 24.00 \\'ARRANT NO. 41185 41186 41187 41188 41189 41190 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS Weber Plywood Company, Plywood Western Salt Company, Lab Salt Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Fees Xerox Computer Services, Computer Service Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction Zellerback Paper Company, Paper TOTAL JOINT OPERATING "C-3" $ AMOUNT 196.74 126.94 2.579.50 4,982.13 1,735.68 1,749.00 $155,887.66 WARRANT NO. 41056 "., 41057 41058 41059 41060 41061 41062 41063 41064 41065 41066 41067 41068 41069 41070 41071 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 · CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS A & T Construction Company, Inc., Contract J-13-1 John Carollo Engineers/Greely Hanson, Constr. P2~23 Cole-Parmer Instruments, Microscope Donovan Construction Company, Stop Notice Pl-16 Eastman, Inc., Office Furniture Johnson Steel Corporation, Contract J-6-lE C. H. Leavell & Company, Contract P2-23-3 Motorola, Inc., Mobile Radios Pascal & Ludwig, Contract P2-23-5 & P2-23-1 Perkin Elmer Corporation, Laboratory Equipment The Register, Legal Ad PW-065, I-IR, E-092 Scientific Products, Laboratory Equipment · Skipper and Company, Contract PW-055-1 H. C. Smith Construction Company, Contract P2-23-6 Southern Calif. Testing Lab, Testing P2-23-l & P2-23-3 VWR Scientific, Gas Analysis Assembly TOTAL CORF TOTAL CORF & JOINT OPERATING "C-4" AMOUNT $ 11,605.50 15,447.33 145.06 20,006.25 669.92 4,500.00 252,264.20 3,410.75 \ 166,100.30 1,005.23 258.10 44.65 9,513.72 270,000.00 220.50 495.23 $ 755,686.74 $ 911,574.40 WARRANT NO. 41052 WARRANT NO. 41053 \...) WARRANT NO. 41054 WARRANT NO. 41055 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID MARCH 28, 1978 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF Lowry and Associates, Design Engineering 2-19 and 2-20 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND DISTR'ICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF F. B. Cook Corporation, Contract 3-lR-3 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 OPER. FUND DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF F. W. Dodge, Sale of Pipe Ad TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Universal Savings & Loan, Plan Check Deposit Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPER. FUND "D" AMOUNT $ 8,205.07 $ 8,205.07 AMOUNT $ 2,078.61 $ 2,078.61 AMOUNT $ 87.75 $ 87.75 AMOUNT $ 1,044.37 $ 1,044.37 APRIL 12 , 1 978 , JOINT MTG. 'r-5 ) Received & filed Minute Excerpts Joint Chairman Saltarelli asked t o have new Directors in troduced. Introduced Gamb i na, Ve l asqu ez , Mi l ler , Graham and Stanton . (7 -a) Report of Joint Cha i rman Cal l ed an Executive Committee meeting for April 26th and inv ited Directors Bernard Houston and Dona l d Hudson to attend . (7 -b) Report of Genera l Manager FAH reported that West Coast ocean dischargers are s t ill working on wa i ver of secondary treatment regul ations. Very doubtful if they are going to get away wi th much . S a i d ther e will be conference in Wa shington next week on ocean o ut f alls and hope to get Sen ate staff more accurately informed on who l e issue of secondary treatment requirements. Regul ations a r e schedu l ed to be published by EPA next week and will be a 45-day comment pe riod . Told Directors we have been advised Massachusetts is go i ng to sue EPA on regul ations . Wil l keep Directors informed. (7 -c) Report of General Counse l TLW reported that at the last Jo i nt Meeting the question of Jarvis- Gann Initiative came up and was some discussion among Dire c tors . Pending action of the Boards tonight, said we wil l prepare a resolution . Advised that there was an additiona l sta ff upd a te in Directors ' folders. Said in the event it is the decision of t he Boards to take a stand , he was recommending preparing resolution to be considered at the n e xt Board Meeting . Re Conf l ict of Interest r e ports, said there have been a great number of inquiries as each and every one of us have to fill out n umero us reports as elected official s of city of c o unty and member s of othe r agencies. Re q uestion regarding using State's form , advised that not a l l cities use the State form . Have been modified some. Is no con si s tency th e re either. Sa i d one of the thoughts we are working on , but not for this year , is to devise a r epo r t that basically contains some declaration that you are an official of the city and your Disclosure Statement wi ll apply here also . Said P l a nning Comm i ssioner files entirely different forms . Smith asked why they couldn 't use the State 721 Fo rm? Said he didn't think it was right and proper to go along with this and have t o f ill out so many forms. I s more chance of error this way. Dire9tor Roth (?) said that Hopkins had said that th ey could just include a sheet saying that it include s their interes ts in th e whole county. No reason to d o these fo rms. Should try to cut paperwork. TLW said he didn't want to review all the forms to be sure they are accurate and is trying to devise a system to allow interchange of forms . Said he wholly concurred with Directors' comments. Graham then added that inasmuch as a good number of cities use the State forms, it seems to be the simplest way. Asked if there is a reason why we can't use the State forms in this District. Tom answered no , but our current Code has forms that were approved by the Districts. Wedaa asked if they could take their city forms and Xerox and send here. Tom said no, because they only address the city and fail to take into consideration any interests outside the city and within the Districts' jurisdiction. Wedaa then added we could just add a supplement tothe form . Saltarelli stated we would have to change our policy to be able to use cities ' forms. Said if Directors would like , could put on Executive Committee agenda. Too late to do anything this year but will change for next year. Then added maybe we could try to do it this year. Anybody that wants to, could just send that form in with an additional letter. TLW advised that State law requires that we adopt a code. Requests that we forward to Board of Supervisors . Our code has never been approved by Board of Supervisors yet. If are going to change the reporting forms or procedures, should do it immediately . If Board wants to take some action now to amend resolution to allow the General Counsel to devise a cover sheet to al low some other forms , we will do our very best . Asked for a motion to that effect . Smith moved that the Board authorize TLW to amend Disclosure Statement to use same form as their city or entity and add a cover sheet stating that it covers all property within the county as an option to the current forms being used . Motion seconded. It was restated that forms they already have are okay . This is just an option . Ortiz asked if it would be okay to put their name on a letter saying it was the same as the city for the Districts. TLW answered , no . Winters added that i t seems kind of sudden and rather a burden to the staff to do this in two weeks . Maybe should wait until 1979 . Saltarelli stated that if motion carries , Directors can just send letter in . Voice vote on motion . Motion carried. (9-t) CONSENT CALENDAR item re application for waiver of s e condary treatment requirements Sharp asked if staff still recommends this after what Mr. Harper reported earlier in the meeting? FAH said he still recommends we go ah e ad as we have as good a chance as anyone. Motion moved, se cond e d and carried. -2- (12-b-l)Re : SCAG 208 Early Action Program Design Graham asked if we expect any results. FAH answered, yes , very definitely . (12-c -l Re : Continued representation in CASA by Don Winn & 2) Director Houston abstained from voting. (13-c) ALL DISTRICTS -Other business FAH welcomed ne~ Directors and advised we will be planning a speci al meeting for new Directors to go through our facilities and kind of an indoctrination on how we operate and function. Will be sometime after the May meeting. In addition, we have some new facilities that have come on line since the first of the year · and are waiting for dedication . Are hoping to get EPA administrator here. Have scheduled it twice. Will maybe have some kind of dedication at June meeting where all Directors can see facilities . Maybe a dinner along with it. Told the Directors to come down anytime before that and we wil l be happy to show them the facilities to give them a little idea of what we are doing and why . (16) DISTRICT 3 -Other business Schmidt requested all of the Directors' prayers for him this month as he is racing in the Boston Marathon . (25) DISTRICT 7 -OPA George Rach introduced himself as a representative of the Orange Park Association. Referred to the outstanding obligation with the Sanita- tion District in the amount of $5,067 .88. Said he wanted to publicly apologize. Advised that the Districts' Counsel did a thorough job in reminding them that they owed this. HA Said he was here to make a proposition to the Directors . Read letter written by new president of OPA, Cathy Ashford. OPA to pay Sanitation Districts within 30 days $2,500 . Remainder will be paid on or before July 1, 1979, and on or before July 1, 1980 , in two equal payments . Said he hoped the Directors would consider this proposed pay schedule. Advised he had a check with him in the amount of $2,500. Stated that this obligation is acknowledged and appreciated our efforts. Said payment schedule is drawn out over two years but feel comfortable that debt will not last that long. Applause. Saltarelli said we appreciate their going that way . Asked Directors if that is acceptable. Barrett added that he was very appreciative of that action. Moved and seconded to accept proposal forp:l.yment. Motion carried by voice vote. Mr . Rach then commented that circumstances in the area are at a high because of the rains. Are a group in the area that would like to know what could be done to incorporate?? Is a segment that are believ~rs this year that we have a problem. Saltarelli told Mr. Rach to feel free to contract staff with their problem. -3- . . . 4 ... -' '28-c) DISTRICT 2 -Annexation No. 28 Smith asked if this area was in the City of Anaheim. Was answered, yes. Asked if it was on the north side of ridge and was answered yes. Smith stated it was not in the City of Anaheim then. Asked if this was the South Ridge Development and was answered, don't know. Moved to continue items (c) & (d) pending receipt of a map. Saltarelli stated that our concern here is that we have an agreement so we know fees will be paid at time service is needed. Motion to continue item was then seconded and carried by voice vote. (29) DISTRICT 2 -Re Orange Sub-Trunk S.A .·River Crossing Wedaa said that it was of interest to Directors that we are only out-of-pocket $20,000 but was corrected by TLW that the figure is $167,000 for the ultimate capacity that we need across the river, plus the $20,000. Wedaa added that we got out pretty cheap even so. Some of this would have to be done in the future anyway. -4- - ... - - - - - - DATA PROCESSING APPROACH STUDY FOR THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - Board of Directors PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & Co. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 660 NEWPOR! CENTER DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, C.A.Ll.FORNIA 92660 May 3, 1978 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Sirs: We have completed our study of the automation approaches applicable to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (the Districts). This letter summarizes our report and our key recommendations regarding the Districts' use of automation. BACKGROUND In 1974, it was recommended that the Districts automate specific administrative functions on an outside service bureau. Subsequently, the Districts selected Xerox Computer Services (XCS) as the most appropriate outside service bureau. The conversion of the Districts' functions to the XCS applications was undertaken and successfully completed, resulting in the anticipated improved information processing. During the past few years, the Districts' transaction volumes have increased while the level of information requirements is growing. Concurrently, the costs of XCS processing have increased, reflecting the increasing transaction volumes and changes in XCS unit charges. The combination of rising costs, increased application requirements and growth in anticipated future transaction volume has indicated to the Districts a need to re-examine their data processing approach. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the most appropriate data processing approach for the Districts' existing and planned administrative applications over the five-year planning period. - .. P. M. M. a CO. APPROACH To meet the objective, we performed the following tasks: 1. Identified present and future application needs as well as identifying alternative processing approaches which satisfy those needs and their related present and anticipated volumes 2. Identified potential suppliers of the required service and selected for detailed evaluation those services which are most appropriate to the Districts' req uirem en ts 3. Analyzed the alternatives 4. Recommended the most appropriate approach and an action plan for its installation . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Based upon our interviews with members of the Districts' staff and review of the existing XCS applications, we have established the application requirements for this study. These requirements include current automated applications, enhancements to these applications and new applications. Those applications which are now automated via the XCS service should continue to be automated with their respective enhancements and improved integration added. New applications, which include: user charge/industrial cost recovery, budgeting, purchase orders, and funds management, should also be automated. Any other applications considered are for long-term development and would each require a specific feasibility study before being developed. We identified three alternative data processing approaches applicable to the Districts. These included commercial computer services, public agency data centers, and in-house ii - - P. M. M. a. CO. computers. Within these alternatives, further review led us to conclude that the existing XCS service and Municipal Data Systems (MDS) or Public Agency Data Systems (PADS) were the most appropriate alternatives in the commercial computer services and public agency data centers approaches, respectively. Furthermore, we concluded that for the in-house approach, a minicomputer would be adequate for the Districts' processing needs. Our analysis of the alternative approaches centered on services provided, resources utilized, conversion requirements and costs when considering the Districts' requirements and processing volumes. Each alternative was analyzed separately to determine the impact of that approach. The results of this analysis were then evaluated based upon a set of qualitative criteria as well as the costs and financial impact of the alternatives. The results of this evaluation indicate that the minicomputer approach is the most cost-effective and appropriate to meet the Districts' unique requirements over the five-year planning period. We also noted that this is the more risky solution in terms of having to develop software and convert all existing automated applications. The results of our evaluation are summarized below: XCS commercial data processing Public data processing service In-house minicomputer SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Qualitative evaluation 7.45 7.50 8.35 = Five-year planning period Total Present value cash flow of cash flow $ 830,945 750,680 631,495 723,175 661,709 576,013 Based on our analysis and evaluation of alternatives, we recommend the in-house minicomputer approach as the one which is most appropriate for the Districts. Though there are more risks involved in the minicomputer approach, it will better meet the Districts' application requirements and provide for flexibility. These risks can be controlled with careful planning and project management. Because of the lack of specific cost estimates from the public data center services and their potential cost advantages, we do feel they should be invited to propose. If their cost estimates are considerably lower than the minicomputer alternative, they should be reconsidered. iii - - P. M. M. a CO. Furthermore, we recommend an action plan which provides for: 1. Selection of a minicomputer vendor 2. System implementation 3. Evaluation of other applications 4. Evaluation of cost-effectiveness. * * * * Our thanks are extended to the Districts and the joint administration staff for their cooperation during this study. Very truly yours, iv - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INTRODUCTION Background . Objectives Approach TABLE OF CONTENTS DATA PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS .... Existing Applications . . . . . Short-term Planned Applications Long-term Planned Applications Application Automation Summary Projected Processing and Storage Volumes IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF PROCESSING ALTERNATIVES Definition of Alternatives Commercial Computer Service Analysis Public Agency Data Center Analysis In-house Computer Analysis EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Alternative Evaluation Based upon Criteria . Cost and Financial Evaluation and Conclusion RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN Recommendations . . . . . Action Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . ILLUSTRATIONS Application Automation Assumptions Average Monthly XCS Utilization and Cost Annual Cost Summary XCS Commercial Data Processing Alternative Summary of Public Computer Services Annual Cost Projection Public Agency Data Center Alternative . . . . Page . . I-1 . . I-1 . . I-2 . . I-2 .II-1 .II-1 .II-4 . .II-6 . .II-7 . . .II-7 III-1 . . . . III-1 . . . . III-5 III-9 . . . . . III-11 .. IV-1 . . IV-1 . IV-2 .V-1 .V-1 .V-1 . . Facing page II-7 Facing page III-5 Facing page III-8 Facing page III-9 Facing page III-11 - - TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued In-house Computer Application Software Cost Estimate . . . . . . . . . . In-house Computer Annual Cost Projection Qualitative Evaluation of Alternatives Cost and Present Value Evaluation of Automation Alternatives EXHIBITS Projected Monthly Transaction Volumes for Facing page III-14 Facing page III-15 Facing page IV-2 ..... IV-3 Five-year Planning Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Projected Monthly Output Print Volumes for Five-year Planning Period . . . . . . Projected Disk Storage Utilization . . . . . Projected Xerox Computer Services Rates Computer Application Staffing Requirements Xerox Computer Services Alternative Computer Application Staffing Requirements Public Agency Data Center Alternative Computer Application Staffmg Requirements In-house Minicomputer Alternative . . II . .III . .IV .v .VI VII I -INTRODUCTION The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (the Districts) have engaged Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (PMM&Co.) to prepare a revenue program as described in a proposal dated March 29, 1977. Pursuant to the goals and objectives of that proposal, this report covers a portion of that study identified as Task 7 on data processing alternatives which are available for administrative, financial and management information requirements of the Districts, encompassing a five-year evaluation time frame. The following discusses the objectives of the study and our approach to the fulfillment of study objectives. BACKGROUND Prior to 197 5, the Districts employed an NCR accounting machine to process accounting applications. The Districts' management specified that this equipment would be utilized until the accounting work load increased to the point where more sophisticated automation could be justified. During the period 1968-1974, the Districts experienced significant growth and an increasing requirement for more comprehensive fiscal reporting. It was estimated in 1974 that the Districts' plant facilities and operations would double by 1978, due primarily to changing sanitation treatment techniques and new environmental regulations promulgated during this period. In 1974, the Districts engaged PMM&Co. to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of automating the existing accounting functions and other planned applications on more sophisticated data processing equipment. Upon completion of this automation feasibility study, a report was issued recommending the automation of specific applications and providing a plan of action for their implementation on an outside service bureau to be selected. Subseque~tly, the Districts selected Xerox Computer Services (XCS) as the outside service bureau, thereby gaining access to numerous on-line accounting applications. During the period of 1974 to the present, the Districts have continued to experience substantial growth, and it is anticipated that the Districts' transaction volumes will double during the five-year period ending in 1982. Concurrently, the costs of XCS processing have 1-1 climbed steadily, reflecting the increasing processing volumes associated with the Districts' growth and increasing XCS unit costs. These increasing rates, combined with further transaction volume increases and additional application requirements, have caused the Districts to re-examine their data processing approach for the future. OBJECTIVES The objective. of this study is to determine the most appropriate data processing approach for the Districts' existing and planned administrative applications over the five-year planning period. APPROACH The following steps outline our approach to the fulfillment of the study objective: Identify and define the Districts' present and future application needs Identify feasible data processing alternatives which will satisfy both current and projected application requirements and projected transaction volumes during a five-year planning period (1978-1982) Identify potential suppliers of data processing services and/or products most suitable to the Districts' requirements Select for detailed evaluation those alternatives which are most suitable to the Districts' requirements and operating characteristics Analyze the financial impact of each alternative selected and provide a comparison evaluation for the Districts' review Recommend the most appropriate data processing alternative, based on cost considerations and defined evaluation criteria. This approach is culminated with the report presented in the following pages. I-2 - II -DATA PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS This section describes the data processing requirements of the Districts. Our study included an investigation of the existing and planned information needs of the Districts and the processing loads anticipated as a result of any projected growth. EXISTING APPLICATIONS Those applications which are currently automated on XCS relate primarily to functions performed by the Districts' Accounting Department. These applications include the accounting, financial and management information reporting functions described in the following paragraphs. Payroll and Labor Distribution The payroll procedure provides for the maintenance of personnel records, preparation of payroll checks, tax forms and associated management reports and is integrated with job cost accounting. The payroll is complicated by the number of employee-selected deductions possible, special shift and standby differential compensation applicable to specific operations personnel and rules governing overtime compensation paid versus compensatory time off. In addition, the Districts' employees do not have the standard FICA deduction but instead belong to the Orange County Employees Retirement System. The payroll system also provides for the distribution of lal:>or hours and cost into the work order system. Improved integration with the systems in these areas is desired since there are some limitations with the XCS payroll system. Of significance to the payroll procedure is the fact that the Districts' administration expects the number of employees to rise from the current level of about 250 to as much as 400 within the next five years. This will occur because of the addition of secondary treatment facilities and other expanded operations. Accounts Payable The accounts payable procedure incorporates the matching of vendor invoices with purchase orders, the posting of job cost records and the preparation of vendor payments. With 11-1 the anticipated growth of the Districts, plant operations, it is expected that the transaction volumes of this application will continue to grow. In addition, it is the desire of the Districts' management to utilize encumbrances to better control funds. Installing this will require the integration of accounts payable with the job cost system now used to control work orders. Fixed Assets The fixed assets procedure provides for the reporting of an asset's current book value and recording of data vital to the proper accounting of each asset. The Districts currently manage in excess of $21 7 million in the value of physical plant assets with an increase to an anticipated $297 million by 19 80. Items are recorded into the fixed assets system for both completed construction and work-in-progress categories. The existing processing does not integrate the fixed assets pqstings to the general ledger although .depreciation is regularly calculated and posted to the general ledger as depreciation expense. Two factors influence the procedure for fixed assets accounting, the first being the anticipated doubling in the number of the Districts' assets. The second is regulations allowing capitalization of expense for replacement or improvement of assets if the asset is uniquely identified in the agency,s accounting system. Because of these regulations, it has been estimated by the Districts' administration that the currently recorded 5,000 assets would be expanded to 15,000 including new expansion of plant facilities over the five-year evaluation period. General Ledger and Financial Reporting The general ledger system currently maintains a separate ledger for each of the eight Districts in addition to subledgers for each of up to nine funds within these Districts. In addition, five ledgers are maintained for joint operating costs, capital ouilay '· rey9lving ancJ ;, general suspense ledgers. Currently, in excess of 2,300 accounts are used by all the Districts, with an anticipated growth to 3,000 by 1982. The total volume of manual entries to the general ledger will depend on the degree of integration and interface between the general ledger and associated application programs from which transactions are processed. The manual journal entries now number about 1,300 per month because of limitations of the applications being used. II-2 The current system provides detailed financial reports monthly and comparative financial statements for the individual general ledgers. The budgeting capabilities of the current system are not flexible enough to accommodate the Districts' budgeting process. As a result, the Districts still perform their budgeting through manual procedures. Job Cost Accounting The job cost accounting application is the procedure by which all expenses are recorded and reported to the Districts' management. A job is def med as the maintenance or operation of segments of the treatment plant by function, including costs of labor, mileage and equipment, direct purchase orders and warehouse inventory withdrawals. The majority of defined jobs are for ongoing functional activities. A lesser number are defined for construction in progress and one-time maintenance requests. Approximately 650 work orders currently are open. Of these, about 15% are for new construction projects while the remaining work orders are for recording the continuing cost of operation, maintenance and repair of the Districts' facilities. Because of new environmental regulations, the Districts' administration predict that the existing plant assets may double within the next five years. Such growth will require an increase in the work orders necessary to control costs in operating and maintaining the facilities. Therefore, it is probable that the transaction volume for job cost accounting procedures will at least double. The XCS job cost system is limited both in procedure and reporting capabilities because of its intended use in a manufacturing environment. The Districts' future needs will require changes to the job cost system to adequately control anticipated volumes, produce necessary information and interface with other systems and procedures in an efficient manner. Inventory Control (Stores) The warehousing and inventory control function for stores merchandise has previously been accomplished by a manual cardex procedure. The Districts recently attempted to convert the manual procedure to the inventory control module of the XCS system for the 7,000 to 8,000 warehouse items on hand. The conversion was suspended, however, because of difficulties encountered in converting unit measures, accounting for sales tax and lack of complete integration to the job cost accounting. 11-3 - With the planned expansion of the Districts' facilities during the five-year evaluation period, the number of stock-keeping units and warehouse items on hand will continue to grow. As a result, the Districts have decided to complete the conversion effort; however, this effort will await the recommendations of this study. For the purposes of this study, we have assumed that an inventory control application will be fully utilized. SHORT-TERM PLANNED APPLICATIONS Certain capabilities or applications, not now automated, have been identified by the Districts as necessary to the overall information requirements. The implementation of these will be subject to close review by the Districts' staff to assure that benefits warrant any related development or administrative operating expense. Encumbrance Accounting The limitations inherent in the XCS job cost accounting and general ledger applications have not allowed the Districts to operate in an encumbrance mode. Because of the number of open work orders and the increasing cost of these projects, the Districts feel that encumbrances will improve their overall management and cost control and it is therefore necessary to install. In our evaluation, we have assumed that an encumbrance capability will be implemented as a priority activity. We have further considered this encumbrance capability to be an integrated function in the job cost, purchase order and general ledger applications. User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery Recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) laws and rules require that the Districts implement a revenue program for recovery of certain capital expenditures and plant usage based upon volume and characteristic of discharge. This revenue program is divided into two requirements: User Charge. Implementation of the user charge (UC) portion of the Districts' revenue program has a relatively limited impact. There are two major processes to be performed: An as-required update and billing (estimated as once per quarter) of a 4,000 to 25,000 user rate file (SIC Rate File) that will carry individual II-4 - industrial/commercial users' flow/BOD/suspended solids characteristics and applicable user charge rate information. An annual match of a special file from the County Assessor's Office listing these same industrial/commercial users by SIC code and their ad valorem sanitation-related charges against the SIC Rate File maintained by the Districts as outlined in the above paragraph. The result of this match will be a computer tape carrying an annual user charge billing that will be placed on each industrial/commercial user's tax bill by the County Auditor-Controller. The Districts will be required to prepare and maintain computer programs to maintain the SIC Rate File and produce the tape carrying the Districts' user charge billings for the County Auditor-Controller. Industrial Cost Recovery (ICR). The Districts' revenue program includes a requirement for preparation of annual bills for industrial users identified in the Districts' ICR system. The 3,000 to 4,000 industrial users to be billed by the ICR system will be charged on the basis of their flow/BOD/suspended solids contributions to the Joint Treatment Works. To assist the Districts in preparing these billings, the automation approach must accommodate this billing requirement. Budget Preparation and History The Districts desire that the general ledger application be expanded to facilitate budget preparation. Currently, a five-year historic~ analysis to establish cost trends is -performed manually. This requires the review of a five-year expenditure and budget history related to each of the general ledgers. The automation of this data in con junction with trend analysis and forecasting capabilities will provide improved budget planning. Furthermore, the new budget function should allow individual account changes as well as changes to groups of accounts for the budget figures. Purchase Orders An integrated purchase order application is desired by the Districts to complement both the encumbrance accounting and the inventory control system. The system need not be complex, but it should allow creation of purchase orders either automatically as required by the inventory control system or manually. These purchase orders may or may not be treated as encumbrances to particular work orders. Because of the relatively low volume of purchase orders (250 monthly) there is no special need for automated matching of purchase orders, vendor invoices and receivings. II-5 -- - Daily Funds Management and Investment The existmg Districts' fund management procedures are based on maintammg minimum cash balances in each fund. The result of this policy is the accumulation of latent reserves which the Districts have available for short-term investment. With an automated fund management system, in addition to the planned development of encumbrance accounting, the Districts will have the basic information necessary to pool fund resources and thereby maximize short-term investment return. LONG-TERM PLANNED APPLICATIONS Within the five-year planning period encompassed by this study, there are some other potential automation applications. We briefly describe these in the following paragraphs. The implementation of these applications will be subject to close review by the Districts' staff to assure that benefits warrant any related development or operating expense. Plant Process and Operations Modeling The purpose of these models would be to improve the efficiency of the daily plant operations in light of scheduled and emergency maintenance and varying sewage characteristics. These models would be designed to aid in meeting the ever more stringent discharge requirements applicable to the sewage plants operated by the Districts. Concurrently, the models could reduce such operating costs as electrical power demand and emergency shutdowns. Since our fact-finding, it has been decided that a computer will be installed as a part of the Plant Number Two expansion. It has been assumed that this would provide necessary processing for this requirement, and therefore the models have not been further considered in this study. Equipment Maintenance and Repair Scheduling The Maintenance Department currently keeps a record of labor hours charged to the maintenance of about 2,500 identified assets. These records are not currently used for formal reporting or maintenance scheduling. The assets identified are different from those on the fixed asset ledger because of the accounting technique used to record fixed assets. 11-6 Implementation priority High priority Lower priority '_., '--.1 . . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Application Automation Assumptions Current automated applications (by 1977 year-end) Payroll/labor distribution . Accounts payable . Fixed assets accounting I . General ledger Job cost accounting . Inventory control (stores) ( ---I ...... { --1 -. I ~-.· IL -I· October 1977 Short-term planned automation applications (1 -2 years) Encumbrance accounting User charge/industrial cost . recovery Budget preparation and history Purchase orders Daily funds and investment management ·-··, ~ -· c·.-:-·1 f .~, ---·· Long-term planned automation application (3 -5 years) Equipment maintenance and repair scheduling { {-~··1 '-·I A maintenance and repair system could result in the avoidance of cost from unpredictable breakdowns or purchase of new equipment which has a history of low-cost operation. With the expansion of the Districts' facilities and an anticipated four-fold increase in equipment items, there appears to be benefit in an automated system. APPLICATION AUTOMATION SUMMARY Based upon the information requirements derived from our discussions with the Districts' staff and our review of those applications currently being used, we have established application requirements for this study. These requirements include current applications, enhancements to current applications and new applications. These applications and enhancements are shown in the chart on the fa~ing page. Currently automated applications should remain with the desired improved integration and simplified procedures added. Short-term planned applications include both new applications and major enhancements which will improve management and fmancial control of the Districts' operation. In this group, the highest priority is the use of encumbrance accounting at the work order or project level. For long-term automation, we foresee the need for plant process control and operations modeling as the highest priority. Any of these long-term applications would require a specific feasibility study before they are developed. PROJECTED PROCESSING AND STORAGE VOLUMES With the information requirements and the current and projected processing volumes, we have established processing and storage volumes for the Districts. These estimates are the result of information provided to us by the Districts and our analyses of the required applications. These volumes show that the Districts' requirements will cause an increase of more than 100% in volumes for the five-year planning period. Details concerning these volumes are shown in Exhibits: I -Projected Transaction Volumes II -Projected Output Printline Volumes III -Projected District Storage Space II-7 III -IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF PROCESSING ALTERNATIVES ~he purpose of this section is to identify and analyze data processing alternatives available to the Districts to meet the current and future requirements identified in the previous section of this report. These alternatives include the following: Commercial computer services Public agency data centers In-house computer. For each alternative, computer resource requirements and cost projections are based upon volumes presented in the prior section, along with any related assumptions. DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES Before presenting our analysis of each alternative in detail, we are providing here a brief description of the three alternatives we have identified above. These definitions are intended to give the reader a basic understanding of the alternatives and their operating characteristics. Commercial Computer Services This alternative includes data processing service companies which are established expressly to supply the data processing needs of other organizations. This is done by providing the customer's data processing requirements without having major computer equipment, operating and programmirig staff within the customer's organization. The variety and scope of service varies from standard applications for multiple users to unique user-developed systems. These services also incorporate a wide range of operating techniques varying from batch processing to interactive services with on-site terminals. Some service bureaus in this alternative operate primarily on a batch transmittal basis. Examples of firms offering these services are Statistical Tabulating Corporation, Automatic 111-1 Data Processing and Service Bureau Corporation. These organizations are highly experienced and provide support resources in th.e Orange County area. They typically provide basic accounting, inventory control, and job cost applications, and they also are relatively flexible and willing to develop and operate custom applications for the user. In some cases, they will act as the software development house or contract for outside programming services and provide implementation services for the client. On-site interactive terminal service bureaus are very similar to the service currently provided by Xerox Computer Services (XCS) to the Districts in that they operate in an interactive mode with a terminal located in the customer's facility. Examples of other 6.nns offering this type of service are National C.S.S. (NCSS), Boeing Computer Service (BCS) and McDonnell Douglas Automation (MCAUTO). When analyzing this alternative, the following factors need to be considered: Batch service direct costs are typically less than interactive services cost. However, customer staffing levels and inaccessibility of data normally offset this cost difference. The cost of processing and data storage at service bureaus rises in proportion to the increase in transaction volumes. Service agreements with a commercial data processing service provide no guarantee that the pricing structure will remain constant for the term of the agreement. Where the customer elects to utilize a standard application provided by these services, very little adaptation to special operating characteristics is allowed. Some of these services offer application programming and development services to meet unique application requirements of the customer. To refine the commercial data processing service alternative, it is important for us to determine exactly which variation (the batch services or the interactive services) is appropriate to the Districts. Since the Districts are now utilizing a service within this category (XCS), we determined that a change to another supplier would not provide any advantage to the Districts. In reaching this decision, the following facts were considered: A change to another service will require procedural changes and extensive retraining of the Districts' staff. 111-2 Our research indicates that the cost for another service would be equivalent to the current XCS costs, and be subject to th~ same factors such as rising labor costs, transaction volumes and storage requirements which affect the XCS costs. In some cases, more of the Districts' requirements may be met, but in no case does this alone justify a change. Therefore, within the analysis which follows, XCS is the specific service examined for this alternative. Public Agency Data Centers Contrasting to the commercial services described above are the public data processing services also available within Orange County. These centers operate on a basis similar to the commercial centers in that they provide a variety of applications and the necessary computer equipment to process a customer's data. In these cases, however, the service is sponsored by public agencies and they are not profit-making organizations but rather are attempting to spread the cost among a number of users. Since these are public agencies, their applications are typically designed to meet the needs of data processing required by cities. These data centers also have both batch and some interactive capabilities. Two examples of partial interaction are Public Agency Data Systems (PADS) and Municipal Data Systems (MDS). The County of Orange also has a contract with a service supplier and most of their applications are operated in the batch mode. For this study, we have determined that the PADS or MDS services should be analyzed. This has been determined based upon the following information: These centers are actively seeking additional agencies to share their data centers. Their systems are similar to the interactive mode now utilized by the Districts. Their applications are oriented to the unique problems of city governments. III-3 - In-house Computer This category would include the purchase or lease of a computer from a manufacturer or manufacturing representative for installation at the Districts. Application programs and other software would be developed specifically to meet the Districts' data processing needs. A broad range of general purpose business computers is available which have the capabilities to process the Districts' current applications and work load. As a result of our review of the Districts' planned applications requirements, projections of processing volumes and required data collection procedures, we concluded that a minicomputer could satisfy in-house administrative data processing needs for the five-year planning period and beyond. Minicomputers have continued to evolve over the past four years as a result of the technological improvements made in the production of ever smaller and less expensive computer components. Such a computer is characterized by on-line interactive data processing as well as immediate access to data stored in ftles. Specific characteristics include: The minicomputer offers, after initial software development and conversion costs, a relatively fixed cost resource over a wide range of user requirements. . · The minicomputer can provide the user immediate access to programs and data from multiple data entry terminals. In general, the minicomputer does not require a full-time computer operator, although someone needs to be specially trained in its operation. Conversion costs are difficult to estimate and may involve more time and effort than initially planned. If current file sizes are large and it is not possible to off-load these files onto a format to be read by the minicomputer system, a considerable manual conversion effort could be required. Software to replicate those applications currently automated by the Districts, as well all future applications, must be custom designed, tested, and implemented on the computer, representing a sizable one-time investment. Software development and ongoing systems maintenance is often contracted through a third party. This selection must be carefully made as these firms are usually small and in some cases unstable. The installation of an on-site computer may necessitate a part-or full-time programmer at some future point to provide maintenance of existing systems and development of additional software required by changing requirements. III-4 Resource type *Transactions entered (One trans -one line entry) *Disk access units (Units of 100 reads/writes) *Print lines (Terminal and line printer) Computer access port (Base connect rate) Transmission line (Multiplexor) *Reporter usage (Units of 100 reads) Terminal (On-site remote 1/0) Disk storage (Megabytes) -t:Other (File maintenance, restore job setup, forms) Total monthly costs Annualized costs Unit costs *Included in unit costs. [ --I -I c=. [ ·-:-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Average Monthly XCS Utilization and Cost (For the Three-year Period Ending December 31, 1977) 1975 1976 Usage Unit rate XCS cost Usage Unit rate 21,000 s .020 s 420 21,500 s .022 77 N/C 79 .015 105,000 4.0/K 690 135,000 5.6/K 200 1 140 1 256 .14 38 274 .14 1 180 15 .113/K 1,693 19 .104/K 175 s 3,536 s 42,372 .063 .0729 XCS cost s 473 119 762 225 135 41 180 1,983 172 s 4,090 s 49,080 F---· "---j {·-· ----l c·=: (·-~1 ----J [·.--: ·---r [~! -' 1977 Usage Unit rate 21,000 s .022 80 .015 143,000 5.7/K 1 400 .14 19.2 .102/K .0766 XCS cost s 440 120 817 225 135 56 180 1,964 176 s 4,113 s 49,356 [ [ --1 ~~ . r -· l:_ -' COMMERCIAL COMPUTER SERVICE ANALYSIS As stated previously, we have determined that XCS, a commercial computer service now servicing the Districts, would be the specific service analyzed for this alternative. This analysis is divided into the following headings: Service description and considerations Resource utilization Costs. Service Description and Considerations As noted before, the XCS service provided to the Districts operates as an interactive system where editing of data is performed on-line while actual file updating occurs directly after editing. The applications supplied to the Districts by this service include a fund accounting general ledger application and the other existing applications described within the Data Processing Requirements section of this report. Our analysis indicates that these applications work adequately, but because they are not designed specifically for the Districts' requirements, many of XCS's features, such as a high degree of integration, are nullified. For example, the Districts have had to fit their unique job cost accounting system to the XCS system designed for manufacturing control and materials requirements planning. Currently, these automated applications have benefited the Districts and with further changes to the Districts' proced1:1res, most of the planned requirements could be met. It should be pointed out that this would involve underutilizing XCS systems while increasing the Districts' costs for both staff and XCS charges. Resource Utilization . To provide a basis upon which to forecast the cost of data processing resources available from XCS over the five-year evaluation period, we have performed a detailed analysis ... of the Districts' resource utilization history during the three-year period ending December 31, 1977. This analysis has been based on resource utilization statistics provided by XCS showing monthly usage by their designated resource type and is shown on the facing page. It shows how increasing volumes, storage requirements and rates have affected the average monthly XCS costs. 111-5 The large increase in costs between 197 5 and 1976 reflects the Districts' efforts to implement the inventory control system on the computer. This effort was discontinued in 1976. The further increase in costs experienced in 1977 reflects increased volumes on the remaining systems. From this summary, we have reached the following conclusions regarding the Districts' use of the XCS service: Unit costs of processing (based upon transactions entered, disk access units, print lines, and reporter usage) have increased from $.063 per transaction in 197 5 to a projected $.0766 for 1977, for an overall increase of 20% on an adjusted annual basis. Mass storage requirements will continue to increase while the unit cost of storage should decrease from the current $.010 per thousand characters. This is a direct result of the graduated Xerox pricing structure which includes volume price discounts for mass storage. Transaction loadings have been essentially constant during the three-year period ended December 31, 1977, while mass storage has increased approximately 30%. Reporter usage has increased approximately 56% during the three-year period, indicating the need for customized reporting not provided by standard XCS applications packages and the improved XCS reporter. Printed report volume has increased 36% over the three-year period. Utilizing the Districts' volume projections presented in Exhibits I, II and III and the resource types associated with the XCS service, we now project the Districts' requirements over the five-year planning period. The projections are based upon the assumptions, applicable to each XCS resource type as follows: Transactions entered. A transaction is defined as one line item or each terminal carriage return and we project this volume to more than double from 22,500 to 47 ,450 per month. Disk access units. We have assumed that the number of monthly disk access units (reads and writes from mass storage) will double during the five-year evaluation period. 111-6 Print lines. Based on the planned new applications and anticipated growth, we have projected the volume of monthly print lines to increase from 152,690 to 323,970 lines per month over the five-year planning period. Print lines are defmed as both terminal and line printer output lines including transactions entered. Reporter usage. We have assumed the Districts' planned application requirements and the need for more management information reports will increase the level of reporter usage 50%, from 400 to 600 units. On-site terminals. We have assumed that two additional data entry terminals will be required because of the projected increase in transaction volumes. Further, we have assumed the full implementation of the warehousing and inventory control system will necessitate a dedicated warehouse terminal by 1979. Computer access ports. We have assumed that there will be two additional ports to coincide with the additional terminals. Transmission lines. We have assumed that an additional line will be required to coincide with each additional terminal. Disk storage. Mass storage requirements are based on existing and planned application master file sizes. For existing applications, an increase from the Districts' current 20 million characters of storage to approximately 31 million will occur during the five-year evaluation period. The results of applying these assum prions to the volume projections for the Districts are summarized in the following table. Summary of Projected XCS Resource Type Utilization Volume range Resource type Transactions entered Disk access units Print lines 1978 1982 Computer access port Reporter usage Transmission lines Reporter usage On-site terminals Disk 22,500 8,000 152,690 .1 40,000 1 N/A 1 20,000,000 47,450 16,000 323,970 3 60,000 3 3 31,000,000 This table shows that XCS resource utilization will increase by between 50% and 100%. III-7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Annual Cost Summary XCS Commercial Data Processing Alternative 1977 1978 1979 1980 Cost element Costs . One-time Recurring Recurring Recurring Projected billing rates Unit cost rate S.0766 S.0766 S.08 S.085 Storage cost rate S.102/1,000 S.10211,000 S.09/1,000 S.09/1,000 A. Data processing cost Transaction and storage Unit cost $ 19,310 20,865(1) 26,980 33,300 Storage 23,600 25,670(1) 31,790 30,200 Equipment Terminal( s) 2,160 3,600(2) 6,480(3) 6,480 Line(s) and part(s) 4,320 7,200(2) 12,960(3) 12,960 Subtotal 49,390 57,335 78,210 82,940 B. Operations cost Direct staff 19,872 39,220 62,200 81,660 Supplies 300 400 500 550 c. Software development cost 8,500(4) Total costs s 69,562 8,500 96,955 140,910 165,150 = = = (1) Includes enhancements and new systems for six months (2) Includes second terminal for eight months (3) Includes three terminals (4) Assessor modifications and new time-share applications for UC/I CR, Funds, AP /PO r-_-. r:=-: [--~· --I 1981 1982 Recurring Recurring S.09 S.092 S.09/1,000 S.09/1,000 41,630 47,970 33,450 36,660 6,480 6,480 12,960 12,960 94,520 104,070 100,750 118,840 600 650 195,870 223,560 Costs For the XCS alternative, we have projected costs for (a) data processing services and equipment, (b) ongoing operations, and (c) software development and implementation. In these projections, we have utilized XCS resource rates which reflect our conclusions regarding increases based upon the Districts' three-year experience and the projected increase in transaction and storage volumes. The rates used are shown in Exhibit IV -Projected XCS Rates. Data processing service and equipment costs. The costs of the XCS service as already discussed includes a number of resource types which are utilized by the Districts. Our estimates indicate that the annual cost for these will rise from $57 ,335 in 1978 to $104,070 in 1982. This cost increase includes the Districts' increased volumes, anticipated XCS rate increases and the enhanced and new applications. We have also assumed that one additional terminal in both 1978 and 1979 will be required based upon the need for a dedicated terminal in the warehouse and payroll/personnel departments, each of which requires separate lines and computer parts. Operations costs. These costs pertain primarily to the staffing and supplies necessary for the XCS environment. Electricity and facilities costs are negligible and therefore have not been considered. We estimate the staff required to operate the XCS system to be 2.15 people in 1978, rising to 4.45 in 1982; Exhibit V shows the details of this projection. The total annual staff cost would be $39,220 in 1978, rising to $118,840 in 1982. For these projections, we have used an average rate of $1,520 monthly in 1978 for the Districts' staff including benefits, increased 10% annually to reflect salary increases. Software development. Based upon conversations with XCS representatives, we have agreed that they could adapt the Districts' requirements to fit into XCS's software. This would require assistance from XCS and/or another software supplier, and would require more staff for the Districts to operate the system. The cost of this development is estimated at $8,500. The assistance would include modifying the Districts' procedures, developing any time share programs, and converting existing applications. The summary of annual cost projections for this alternative is shown on the facing page. This chart projects that annual XCS costs will increase from $96,955 in 1978 to $223,560 in 1982. 111-8 Applications Operating mode Request handling Rate Considerations applicable to both services COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Summary of Public Computer Se~ces Municipal Data Systems Financial system General ledger/encumbrances Construction ledger Budgets . Payroll/personnel (includes labor distribution) Business licenses . Water/utility billing . Generalized information management system . Work orders (under development) . On-line data entry to batch update . Converting to IBM 370/145 for more interactive processing . Mem her board prioritizes . Approximately 0.6% of operating budget Public Agency Data Systems Financial management system General ledger/encumbrances Fixed assets Investment ledger Budgeting Construction ledger . Payroll/personnel (includes labor distribution) Business/animal license . Water billing . Work order (not converted) . Warehouse/purchase orders (not converted) . On-line data entry to batch update . Converting to HP 3000-11 and interactive processing . Joint powers agency . Approximately S 1. 25 per capita About $15 per hour for programming . Would have to develop several applications for the Districts . No way to link one work order system to several general ledgers without significant modifications . User comments are positive regarding the service . Slow response to unique requests . Commitment to expand members, thus further spreading costs . Uncertain costs until improved charge-out systems prepared PUBLIC AGENCY DATA CENTER ANALYSIS Based upon our definition of this alternative, we have. determined that Municipal Data Systems (MDS) and Public Agency Data Systems (PADS) are the only organizations which meet the Districts' needs within this alternative. In this analysis, we will describe the two services and base cost projects on the lower rates. This analysis is divided into the following parts: Service description and considerations Costs Conversion. Service Description and Considerations Both MDS and PADS operate similarly with on-line data entry, off-line batch processing, and limited inquiry; hence, customers have terminals in their offices to enter data. They both are converting to computer equipment that will allow more development of interactive applications. However, we wish to point out that at this time on-line interactive capabilities are more limited than the XCS services. Since these applications are not designed for the Districts' requirements, some modifications to applications, procedures and additional staff at the Districts would be needed to utilize these services. The chart on the facing page briefly summarizes these two services. Costs The costs included in this analysis include (a) data processing service and equipment, (b) ongoing operations, and ( c) software development and implementation. Data processing services. MDS suggests that an agency estimate processing services and equipment cost by factoring 0.6% of the agency's operating budget as the data processing costs. Since the Districts' budget is $14.6 million for 197 8, using this technique would mean data processing expenses of $87,600 in 1978. PADS reported that a way to estimate their costs is to estimate one dollar to one dollar and twenty-five cents per capita annually. For this comparison, we estimated that the Districts have the activity and staff level equivalent to a city with a population of 50,000; thus, the cost would be $50,000 to $62,500 in 197 8. Based upon this, we have concluded III-9 ... that a cost of $60,000 in 197 8 for the Districts would be a reasonable estimate. In order to project this estimate for the entir .. e five-year planning period, we have utilized a 10% annual increase to reflect the increased volumes anticipated at the Districts' and variable cost increases to be expected at either data processing service. As a result, we estimate that 1982 data processing service costs would be $87 ,850. Operating costs. These are the costs related to staffing, supplies and both equipment and software maintenance. Electricity and facilities costs are negligible and therefore have not been considered. We estimate the staff levels required to operate under this alternative to be relatively low due to their greater applicability to the Districts' requirements. The staffing level in 1978 would be approximately 1.8, rising to 3.3 in 1982; Exhibit VI shows the details of this projection. The total annual staff cost would be $32,830 in 1978, rising to $88,130 in 1982. Salary expense projections are based upon an average monthly rate of $1,520 in 1978 including benefits, increasing by 10% annually to reflect salary increases. We have also estimated that some software maintenance of the Districts' special applications would be required and that this would cost $3,600 in 1978, rising to $7,720 in 1982. Software development. Based upon very preliminary conversations with representatives from these two centers, it appears that some software modifications will be necessary in order to provide data processing services to the Districts. These would be primarily in the area of fund integration, inventory control, work orders and job cost accounting. Further software costs would be related to the development of the funds management and UC/ICR applications. We estimate that these costs would be about S15,000 and they would occur one time. The hourly rate used to calculate this is $15 per hour. Conversion costs. Associated with this alternative is the cost of changing from XCS to the service center. There are three categories of these costs: software, training and the continuation of XCS services during conversion. Software costs relate primarily to any programs and computer time required to convert XCS files to the new applications. We estimate this at $6,000. Training costs are incurred to teach existing Districts staff how to operate the new functions and we have estimated this at $3,000. Continuing XCS costs are incurred to keep the old systems running until conversion to the new applications is complete. On a monthly basis these costs will diminish, but we estimate the total cost to be $28, 700. III-10 A. B. c. D. Cost element Data processing Operations Direct staff Supplies Maintenance -software Software development Enhancements New applications Conversion Software COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Annual Cost Projection Public Agency Data Center Alternative 1978 One-time Recurring 1979 1980 $ 60,000 66,000 72,600 32,830 48,150 58,490 400 500 550 3,600 4,350 5,270 s 4,000 11,000 15,000 6,000 XCS processing (six months) 28,700 Training 3,000 37,700 S 52 2700 96,830 1192000 1362910 1981 1982 79,860 87,850 74,050 88,130 600 650 6,380 7,720 1602890 1842350 ... To summarize the cost associated with this alternative, we have prepared the chart on the facing page. This indicates that a public ag~~cy .would require a one-time cost of $52, 700 and have recurring costs of $96,830 risiilg to $184,350 in 1982. Because of the existing public agency costing methodology, our cost estimates for data processing services are not as accurate as for the other alternatives analyzed in this. study. IN-HOUSE COMPUTER ANALYSIS The in-house computer alternative analysis is based upon the use of a minicomputer. As presented previously in the definitions, a minicomputer offers the most appropriate in-house computing for the Districts' administrative requirements. The analysis of this alternative is divided into: Service description and considerations Resource utilization Costs. Service Description and Considerations Certainly, the minicomputer alternative offers the greatest range of advantages and disadvantages for the Districts. On one hand, it offers the best capability to meet all of the Districts' current and future requirements, both from the applications and growth standpoints . However, the installation and operation of the minicomputer is the most risky in that original application software must be developed and the responsibility for daily operation of the computer rests with the Districts' personnel. We also pointed out specific considerations relative to this alternative within the definition previously presented. We envision the computer functioning as a complete interactive system where transactions are entered, edited and all appropriate files are updated immediately. These transactions would be handled by cathode-ray tube (CRT) terminals located within the key administrative functions of the Districts. Based upon our experience with these systems, the staff requirements for such on-line interactive systems is minimized. To operate the computer should require no more than a specially trained clerk; however, as the number of applications on the computer increases it may be appropriate to have a programmer/analyst on the Districts staff. 111-11 ·..i .... - Resource Utilization We have sized the minicomputer resource requirements based upon the existing and planned applications. The applicable transaction processing and storage requirements used to establish these equipment estimates are presented in Exhibits I, II and III and are based upon existing XCS statistics, our experience in similar studies, and informal estimates solicited from various minicomputer manufacturers. An adequate minicomputer configuration and the approximate price of the equipment for the Districts' needs would be as follows: Minicomputer Hardware Equipment Central processing unit CRT terminals Printer -300 LPM Dedicated printer -60 CPS Disk storage Tape drive Approximate total price Size/number 64 ,000 bytes 3 1 1 40 million bytes 1 Approximate purchase price s 25,000 15,000 10,000 2,500 34,000 10,000 s 96,500 This equipment would be expandable to the extent that faster printers, more disk storage and more tape capacity could be added if the Districts' growth were greater than our projections. It is also important to note that these prices are only for the computer equipment and exclude any charge for application software. We have set the disk storage requirements at 40 million bytes based on the fact that some files will not be needed on-line at all times. If, during specific application design, this proved to be uneconomical, then another 20 million bytes of disk storage at a cost of about $15,000 would be necessary. As already stated, we expect the technical staff resources for this installation would be minimal. It is our experience that certain maintenance and enhancement programming will be required, but this should initially be at a level best provided by an outside service. Later, it may be economical for the Districts to hav~ someone on the staff to provide this service. Another important consideration when looking at the in-house computer alternative is that the III-12 - application software must be developed. To a great extent, this must be done based upon specific Districts requirements. This process is time-consuming and means that the time to get the in-house computer installed would be greater than the other alternatives already discussed. We expect that this software development would be provided to the Districts by a turnkey vendor who supplies both software development and system installation services. Cost The cost of this alternative falls into four areas: Data processing hardware Application development Conversion Operating. Each of these cost areas is analyzed in the following paragraphs. Data processing hardware. As already described in the preceding pages, the cost of the computer equipment is a function of the sizes required to process the Districts work load. Our estimates indicate that this would be about $96,500. This sum could be paid as a one-time payment or on a payment schedule through a third-party lessor. Our later analysis assumes this equipment would be purchased outright and amortized over a five-year period. Application development. The acquisition of application software represents a sizable investment for the Districts with the in-house computer alternative. Much of the software would have to be designed and developed specifically for the Districts' use and some of it would represent duplicating the software capabilities already available through XCS. However, this tailored software would satisfy all of the Districts' information processing requirements, be better integrated, and allow flexibility to meet subsequent unanticipated requirements. We estimate that the total cost for m1mcomputer software would be approximately $72,000. This amount includes both duplicating existing applications and adding the following functions: Encumbrances User charges/industrial cost recovery IIl-13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY In-house Computer Application Software Systems design Program development Payrolinabor distribution Accounts payable Fixed asset accounting General ledger I encumbrances Job cost accounting Inventory control (stores) User charge/industrial cost recovery Budget preparation and history Purchase orders Daily fund management and investments Implementation Data base creation Installation User training Acceptance test Documentation 15% Contingency Cost Estimate Current applications $14,000 3,000 2,500 2,000 4,000 2,000 2,500 3,500 2,000 4,000 2,000 2,500 44,000 6,600 $ 50,600 Planned applications and enhancements 4,000 2,500 5,000 2,000 2,500 1,500 500 500 18,500 2,775 21,275 Total 18,000 3,000 2,500 2,000 6,500 2,000 2,500 5,000 2,000 2,500 1,500 4,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 3,000 62,500 9,375 71,875 Note: These estimates are based on typical commercial software house hourly rates of $40 for analysts and $25 for programming and implementation. ---u -u u I I ~ --u - I. I w u --u I i I.I L I I I ~ - \ ' w I . w \ ' LJ -u - I - ... Purchase orders Daily funds management and investment. It also assumes that both the existing applications and new functions would be developed concurrently. The table on the facing page shows a breakdown of these approximate costs by application. In order to arrive at these estimates, we considered our experiences with similar projects and held informal discussions with software development organizations. While we believe they are representative, we anticipate that there would be some variances between different suppliers for these estimates. Conversion. As in the public center alternative, there would be considerable cost involved in converting from the current automation approach to an in-house computer. Since the vendor supplying the application software would provide most of the training within the development contract, only conversion software, facilities site preparation and XCS processing costs are considered. Conversion software should be the same $6,000 cost as in the public center alternative. Because of the longer time period to develop and implement this alternative, we estimate the XCS conversion processing to be $43,050. The site preparation cost should be minimal with the provision for electrical outlet and some air conditioning capacity being the only special expense. This cost would probably be about $3,500. ' Operating costs. These costs pertain primarily to the staffing and supplies necessary in the minicomputer alternative. Electrical and facilities costs are not significant and therefore have not been considered in this a.J?-alysis as cost items. Staffmg requirements separate into direct staff required to perform the automated administrative and accounting functions as well as any staff required to operate the minicomputer. We estimate that the functional staff will be 2.05 people in 1978, rising to 3.40 by 1982. The minicomputer technical staff would include a part-time operator estimated at a half-time allocation for one person in 1978, rising to 0.7 of a person in 1982; we would expect this to be contracted for from a software vendor. Exhibit VII shows the detail of this projection. The total annual staff cost to the Districts would be $37 ,390 in 1978, rising to $90,800 in 1982. For purposes of staff cost projections, we have utilized an estimated rate of Sl,520 monthly for the Districts' staff. This figure includes burden and is increased annually by $10% over the five-year planning period. Supplies are also of significance in operating cost considerations. Our estimates are based upon the total cost of supplies for both current XCS billings and in-house provided items. This reflects needs normally experienced with the installation of an on-site interactive computer such as paper, disk packs and tapes . III-14 A. Data processing Equipment amortization Fourth CRT terminal B. Operations Direct staff Supplies Software maintenance Hardware maintenance c. Software development Current applications New applications D. Conversion Software COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY In-house Computer Annual Cost Projection 1978 One-time Recurring 1979 1980 $ 19,300 19,300 19,300 1,100 37,390 51,160 64,000 1,000 1,100 1,250 6,000 6,600 7,250 7,800 8,100 8,400 $ 50,600 21,275 6,000 XCS processing (nine months) 43,050 Facility 3,500 $124,425 71,490 862260 1012300 r-:-= j ['=-c--c __ 1981 1982 19,300 19,300 1,100 1,100 78,900 90,800 1,400 1,550 7,990 8,780 8,800 9,000 1172490 1302530 Maintenance of the computer equipment is estimated to cost $650 monthly in 1978. In 1982, we estimate that this will increase to $7 50 monthly reflecting anticipated changes in labor costs. The total estimated cost for the minicomputer alternative reflecting amortized and recurring costs is $71,490 in 1978, rising to $130,530 in 1982. In addition, first-year (1978) one-time costs would total $220,925, of which $124,425 would be expensed in 1978 and $96,500 would be amortized as data processing equipment amortization. The details of these projections over the entire five-year period are shown on the facing page. In this summary and for later analysis, costs for software are treated as end-of-year cash flow along with other expenses while computer equipment is amortized over the five-year planning period. III-15 - IV -EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES This section of the report presents the evaluation of the three automation alternatives presented in the previous discussions. This evaluation is two-fold; we f:trst performed a qualitative scoring of each alternative based upon predefined criteria and secondly we performed an evaluation of the relative costs and financial impact of the alternatives. ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION BASED UPON CRITERIA To establish a quantitative basis by which we could evaluate the qualitative aspects of the alternatives, we have measured each alternative against specific criteria. The definition of these criteria and the score given them is described in the following paragraphs. Definition of Criteria The following are the criteria by which the presented automation alternatives are evaluated: Ability to Meet Information Requirements. This criterion weighs the ability of the alternatives evaluated to provide the specific applications required by the Districts. In addition, the criterion weighs the capacity of the alternative to meet the information requirements, both in terms of increased volumes and new applications for the planning period. A weighting factor of 30 is given to this criterion. Ease of Operation. The ease with which the Districts will be able to use and operate the system is measured by this criterion. This includes not only equipment operations, but also accessibility to data and programs, physical convenience of operations, training of new personnel and vendor support available to the Districts. A weighting factor of 20 is given to this criterion. Ease of Implementation. This criterion weighs the impact of conversion and systems development activities on the Districts' organization and physical facilities. This includes not only required changes to procedures but the impact of installation and implementation of the required systems on a computer located within the Districts' administration building. A weighting factor of 15 is given to this criterion. IV-1 Criteria Ability to meet information requirements Ease of operation Ease of implementation Capacity and reporting capability Reliability and quality of service Supplier stability Physical environment Total weighted value COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Qualitative Evaluation of Alternatives XCS commercial computer center Public agency data center Weighted Weighted Weight X Value = value Weight X Value = value 30% 5 1.5 30% 8 2.4 20% 8 1.6 20% 7 1.4 15% 10 1.5 15% 5 0.75 10% 6 0.6 10% 8 0.8 10% 9 0.9 10% 7 0.7 10% 9 0.9 10% 10 1.0 5% 9 0.45 5% 9 0.45 7.45 7.5 = = C::I r:-: ..---,I r-, ... ---' --; [-:; (~I _, .---1 ._ ---' [--I r--~-----: r=.1 In-house minicomeuter Weighted Weight X Value = --value 30% 10 3.0 20% 9 1.8 15% 6 0.9 10% 9 0.9 10% 7 0.7 10% 7 0.7 5% 7 0.35 8.35 (--~1 --! L_; - -- Capacity and Reporting Capability. This criterion weighs the amount of work and the speed with which work can be processed under each alternative. It also considers the range of reports to be offered and the ease with which new or special reports can be prepared. A weighting factor of 10 is given to this criterion. Reliability and Quality of Service. The reliability criterion is intended to weigh the experience of users with the software and the equipment involved and the quality of service the alternative provides. Quality of service is concerned with the maintaining of software and hardware systems at a level necessary to meet the Districts' changing operating requirements. A weighting factor of 10 is given to this criterion. Supplier Stability. This criterion is intended to weigh the continuity of service the alternative has provided its existing users. In this report, we are applying this criterion not to specific suppliers but to the generic cases of outside service bureaus and minimanufacturers and their OEM representatives. A weighting factor of 10 is given to this criterion. Physical Environment. Considered by this criterion is the impact each alternative will have on the administration building in terms of space, power and air conditioning requirements. A weighting factor of five is given to this criterion. The weighting factors are to be applied to the scores given the criteria for each alternative. This method produces a total weighted "score" for each alternative for comparison purposes where the higher score indicates a particular criterion was measured better than the other alternatives. Criteria Evaluation and Conclusion From the methodology and weighting factors defined above, we have prepared the table on the facing page, which presents the qualitative evaluation of each alternative. Based upon this evaluation, we have concluded that the in-house minicomputer alternative is the most appropriate one for the Districts' needs. COST AND FINANCIAL EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION This portion of our evaluation presents a comparison of the alternatives based upon their respective costs and financial analysis. IV-2 c:: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Cost and Present Value Evaluation of Automation Alternatives XCS commercial data erocessing service Public agency data center Year Cash flow Present value Cash flow 1978 s 105,455 105,455 149,530 1979 140,910 132,596 119,000 1980 165,150 146,323 136,910 1981 195,870 163,306 160,890 1982 223,56Q 175,495 184,350 Total cost s 830,945 750,680 Total present value s 723,175 Note: Present value calculations based upon the following: . 6%% cost of capital based on six-month Treasury Bill rate. . In-house computer would have a residual value of $10,000 at end of 1982 . . Outright purchase of in-house computer and equipment occurs in 1978. r-.. ; ( --·. ( --: ---I --I Present value 149,530 111,979 121,302 134,183 144,715 661,709 [--:; In-house computer Cash flow 273,115 66,960 82,000 98,190 111,230 631,495 [-·. r~: ~~, ' '-.,. --' Present value 271,145 63,010 72,652 81,891 87 ,315 5762013 .-, ~~I [ ··--'1 _, - Recurring and One-time Costs The sum of recurring and one-time costs for each alternative over the five-year planning period indicates that total dollar cost ranges from $830,945 to $631,495. The chart on the facing page shows the cash flow figures for each year by alternative and are extracted from the "Annual Cost Projection" charts found in the analysis of each alternative. Based upon the amount of dollars spent, we conclude that the in-house computer alternative is the most advantageous. Financial Analysis A further analysis of the cost associated with each alternative relates to the present value of the money expended. This analysis is based upon a discounted cash flow comparison where the money is expended as indicated in the cash flow projection shown on the facing page. This analysis indicates the present value for the cash flow involved in each alternative as follows: XCS commercial data processing Public agency data center In-house minicomputer $ 723,175 661,709 576,013 This analysis indicates that the in-house computer alternative is the one which offers the Districts its most favorable use of money. The present value comparison is based upon a 6%% rate for cost of capital, the assumption that all equipment and software would be purcha:sed outright in 197 8 and the assumption that the in-house computer would have a residual value of Sl0,000 at the end of 1982. IV-3 - - - V -RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN This section of our report presents our recommendations and a general action plan indicating how these might be-implemented. RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the conclusions derived from our evaluation of the alternatives, we believe that an in-house computer is the one which is most appropriate for the Districts over the 6.ve-year planning period. We do, however, wish to point out two factors which warrant consideration. The use of an in-house computer is a more risky solution to the automation requirements if appropriate attention is not given to the selection and monitoring of the installation and development of hardware and software. A carefully planned selection and implementation process would greatly help to minimize the risk. We therefore, in consonance with our overall recommendation, recommend that the steps in the following action plan be followed in order to implement the in-house computer. A second factor in this study was the lack of specific cost estimates from the public agency data center services due to their current charge-out methodology. If they were prepared to bid a cost which was considerably less than the recommended alternative, certainly they would have to be reconsidered. We believe that the fairest way to obtain this information would be to include them as recipients of Requests for Proposals. ACTION PLAN Our experience indicates that the successful installation of any computer system is dependent upon the execution of a properly conceived and administered plan. Such a plan should identify major steps and tasks, along with reasonable target completion dates. In addition, the responsibilities of all individuals or organizations involved should be clearly defined. To this end, it is important that the Districts' ad.ministration take an active and involved role during the implementation of the computer systems. V-1 - We have prepared a general implementation plan for use by the Districts. Within this plan, we have identified five distinct phases for the overall project and describe these phases in the following paragraphs. Phase I -Data Processing Alternatives Study This phase is complete with the Districts' review and acceptance of this report. The purpose has been to determine the best alternative for the Districts' applications processing requirements. Phase II -Selection of Minicomputer Vendor The purpose of this phase is the selection of a vendor to supply the required data processing systems. The tasks involved are listed below: Task 1. Prepare and release a Request for Proposal. Task 2. Fact-finding and preparation of proposals by vendors. Task 3. Evaluate vendor proposals and select vendor. Task 4. Sign contract with vendor. Phase III -System Implementation This is the most significant phase of the implementation plan. Both management and staff personnel will need to spend considerable time and energy to ensure that this phase is successfully completed. At the beginning of this phase, a more detailed review of the tasks and the time allowances should be completed before further steps are taken. Task 1. Establish priorities and plan system implementation. Task 2. Prepare application systems specifications in conjunction with vendor. Special attention should be paid to coding structures and specific reporting requirements of the Districts. V-2 .... - Task 3. Prepare procedures. Task 4. Modifications to applications software made by vendor . Task 5. Implement applications. For each of the applications in Task 5, a number of identical subtasks will need to be performed. These subtasks would include: Prepare new forms Review vendor system modifications Convert files to the computer Train staff in use of the system Test new system Run parallel operations of existing systems versus new system. Phase IV -Evaluation of Other Applications As a follow-up to the Districts' original assessment of the applications requirements, a review should be made to reconsider the planned applications. The depth required of such a study would be dependent upon factors that become known during the completion of Phase III. Phase V -Evaluation of Cost-effectiveness In this phase, it is the responsibility of management to monitor the computer system's cost-effectiveness as the Districts grow and needed additional applications are installed. In the future, it may become economical to consider system modifications or other systems. Although every attempt will be made to select systems providing the greatest upward mobility and overall adapability to the Districts' environment, the state of the art of minicomputer science is dynamic and more cost-effective o~ferings can conceivably become available during the five-year evaluation period. V-3 - Exhibit I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Projected Monthly Transaction Volumes for Five-year Planning Period Applications Existing Payroll/Labor Distribution Accounts Payable Fixed Assets Accounting General Ledger Job Cost Accounting Inventory Control (Stores) Subtotal Planned Encumbrance Accounting User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery Budget Preparation and History Purchase Orders Daily Funds Management and Investment Subtotal Total Monthly Transaction Volumes Current Projected 10,000 2,500 1,000 3,000 4,000 2,000 22,500 22,500 16,250 5,000 3,000 4,000 8,000 4,000 40,250 1,000 3,500 1,000 1,500 200 7,200 47,450 Note: Transactions are defined as an input line transmitted and are based upon the existing Xerox Computer Services IAS system and reflect their level of integration. l ( -[ l. (_ ( l l ( I ( I I ( ( I l ( l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Projected Monthly Output Print Volumes for Five-year Planning Period Print Lines BiweeklI MonthlI Other Applications Current Projected Current Projected Current Projected Existing Payroll/Labor Distribution 25,000 40,625 '5,000A Accounts Payable 15,000 30,000 Fixed Assets 7,500 30,000 General Ledger 25,000 35,000 100,000A Job Costing 40,000 80,000 7,500 15,000 30,000A Inventory Control 3,000 6,000 8,000A 16,000A Miscellaneous 2,500 Subtotal 25 2 000 40,625 98 2 000 198 2 500 8 2 000A 151 2 000 Planned Encumbrance Accounting 6,300 100,000A User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery 2,500 30,000A Budget Preparation and History 2,500 Purchase Orders 2,500 Daily Fund Management and Investment 500 Subtotal 14,300 130,000 Total 251000 401625 981000 2121800 8 1000A 281 1000A Convert to Montnly: tzj >4 Biweekly X 2.16 54,020 87,750 ::s'" ..... Annual -i-12 670 23,420 C'° ...... rt Monthly Equivalent Total 1521690 3231970 H H A= Annual. Exhibit III COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Projected Disk Storage Utilization Storage Requirements Applications File Name (Bytes) Existing Payroll/Labor Distribution P/R Transaction 1,600,000 Payroll Master 90,000 Employee Master 60,000 Personnel File 750 2 000 Subtotal 2,500 2 000 -Accounts Payable Vendor Master 75,000 Open Invoices 110,000 -Open Purchase Order 1,650,000 Order History 1,980,000 Subtotal 3,815,000 Fixed Assets Transactions 240,000 Master File 7 2 100,000* Subtotal 7 2 340 2 000 General Ledger G/L Transaction 3,200,000 G/L Master 1,050,000 G/L History 1,050,000 ... Budgetary Information 300,000 Subtotal 5 2 600 2 000 ....- Job Cost Job Transaction 640,000 Open Cost Ceµters 225,000 ~ Cost History Master 2 2 700,000 Subtotal 3 2 565 2 000 --Inventory (Stores) Inventory Transaction 320,000 Item Master 1,600,000 Inventory History 1 2 600 2 000 -Subtotal 3 2 520,000 Miscellaneous 1,0002000 Total Existing Applications 271340:.000 - Exhibit III, Cont. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Projected Disk Storage Utilization, Continued Applications Planned Encumbrance Accounting User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery Budget Preparation and History Purchase Orders Daily Fund Management and Investment Total Planned Applications Total Projected Applications Utility Storage Work Areas (30%) Application Programs Subtotal Total Peak Load Requirement Less Potential Off-loaded Files* Total On-line Disk Storage Bytes Storage Requirements (Bytes) 750,000 5,000,000* 1,450,000 450,000 200,000 7,850,000 31,575,000 9,470,000 5,000,000 14,470,000 53,895,000 (12,i00,000) 41.795.000 ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR.ANGE COUNTY Projected Xerox Computer Services Rates Resource Type 1 Transactions Entered {per transaction) Disk Access Units {per hundred)1 Print Lines {per thousand) Reporter Usage (per hundred) On-site Terminal (per month) Computer Access Port (per month) Transmission (per month) Disk Storage (per thousand) Miscellaneous Costs $ Exhibit IV Rate Range 1978 1982 .022 .0265 .015 .0180 5.700 6.0000 .140 .1680 180.000 180.0000 225.000 225.0000 135.000 135.0000 .100 .0900 176.000 214.0000 (1) Assumes an increase of 20% in volume-dependent rates during the five-year period. Exhibit v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Computer Application Staffing Requirements Xerox Computer Services Alternative Current Projected Levels1 Staffing Function 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 -Payroll/Labor Distribution .so .65 .75 .85 1.00 1.00 Accounts Payable/Purchase Orders .20 .25 .50 .50 .60 .70 General Ledger/Encumbrances .30 .so .55 .55 .60 .65 Job Cost Accounting .20 .25 .30 .40 .45 .50 Inventory Control (Stores) .50 .65 .90 .90 1.00 User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery .10 .10 .15 .15 Budget Preparation and History .05 .05 .OS .05 Management Reporting .10 .25 .30 .30 -Daily Funds Management .10 .10 .10 .10 .. Total Staff 1.20 2.15 3.10 3.70 4.15 4.45 == = ==== = == ===== ~ (1) Assumes increase in transaction volumes per Exhibit I. ... Exhibit VI COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Computer Application Staffing Requirements Public Agency Data Center Alternative Current Projected Levels Staffins Function 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 -Payroll/Labor Distribution .so .so .55 .. 60 .70 .so Accounts Payable/Purchase Orders .20 .30 .30 .30 .35 .35 General Ledger/Encumbrances .30 .30 .35 .35 .40 .40 -Job Cost Accounting .20 .25 .30 .40 .45 .50 Inventory Control (Stores) .45 .55 .65 .70 .so User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery .10 .10 .15 .15 Budget Preparation and History .05 .05 .05 .05 Management Reporting .10 .10 .15 .15 ... Daily Funds Management .10 .10 .. 10 .10 Total Staff 1.20 1.80 2.40 2.65 3.05 3.30 = = = = ==== = Exhibit VII COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUl\1TY Computer Application Staffing Requirements In-house Minicomputer Alternative Current Projected Levels Staffing Function 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Payroll/Labor Distribution .50 .50 .50 .60 .60 .70 Accounts Payable/Purchase Orders .20 .25 .30 .30 .35 .35 General Ledger/Encumbrances .30 .30 .35 .35 .40 .40 Job Cost Accounting .20 .10 .10 .15 .15 .15 Inventory Control (Stores) .40 .so .60 .65 .70 User Charge/Industrial Cost Recovery .05 .05 .10 .10 Budget Preparation and History .05 .05 .05 .05 Management Reporting .10 .10 .lS .lS Daily Funds Management .10 .10 .10 .10 Subtotal 1.20 1.5S 2.0S 2.30 2.S5 2.70 Computer Technic1an .so .so .60 • 70 .70 Total Staff 1.20 2.0S 2.5S 2.90 3.25 3.40 == = == = z:::=::c::c::c c= I i 1.-l : ) , I -' i I J J j I w I I \.J ' \ ; b.J J I b.l J I l-1 @:i~ Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.