The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-03-08COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) March 1, 1978 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING • • • • a DISTRICTS NOS. 1J ·2~···3., ·SJ ··5., 1 &·11 WEDNESDAY J M:~RCH 8 ~· 1978 · · ~ 7: 30 P ·,· ~t 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY., CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County . Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled upcoming meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, March 22, 1978, at 5:30 p.m. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Month March April May June July . August ·September October November December January February March COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS_ of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108..C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 91708 L > (714) 540-2910 ~ (71 .. ) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXEClITIVE COMMIITEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meeting Date Mar. 8, 1978 Apr. 12, 1978 May 10, 1978 June 14, 1978 July 12, 1978 Aug. 9, 1978 Sep. 13, 1978 Oct. 11, 1978 Nov. 8, 1978 Dec. 13, 1978 Jan. 10, 1979 Feb. 14, 1979 Mar. 14, 1979 Tentative Executive Conunittee Meeting Date Mar. 22, 1978 Apr. 26, 1978 May 24, 1978 Jtme 28, 1978 July 26, 1978 None Scheduled Sep. 27, 1978 Oct. 25, 1978 Nov. 22! 1978 None Scheduled Jan. 24, 1979 Feb. 28, 1979 Mar. 28, 1979 ' ' fllE ................. . lETIER •..••...•.•.•• B O AR DS O F o mECTORS County Soni!ot:on Districts Post Offico Box 8127 o f Orange County, Colifornio 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 9270S Telci>hones: JOI NT BO ARD S Are:J Code 71 -4 5.C0-2910 962-2.Cl 1 A G EN D A MEETING DA TE MARCH 8J 1978 -7:3 0 P.M. ANY DI RECTO ~ DES IR I NG ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION J STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IM M ~DIATELY PRECEDING \~EDNESDAY 1 S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJO I ti I NG THE D t STR I CTS' BOARD ROOM, . (1) Pledge o f Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special guests ADIOUR:lMENTS PJSTED .. ~ C01.~P & "illi:r ... E .. ic.:.. .. . FILES SH UP •.. ~ ... . 1m:aLUT:GNS CERTifiED .. ~ LCTTrns \"/t-!ITT~N .... ~ ...• MlflliTES V!RITTEN .. ~ .•• ~ MINUTES HLED ..... .,~.,- (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any A/.C ... .lKlR .... ll1 {? DISTRICT 7 --···-·-··~··· ...... ·- ITEMS OH (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of Elvin Hutchinson as alternate Director to Francis H. Glockner --··-··-"-sUPPLEMfNTAl AGENDA FILE ....... -......... LEmR .............. (7) A/C .... TKLR .... v ..... ---··~··-········· ya. .. _. • .._._. ... ou•••••••- EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes cf the following meetings, as mailed: District l February 8, 1978, regular District 2 February 8, 1978, regular District 3 February 8, 1978, regular Di.strict s February 8, 1978, r egular District 6 February 8, 1978, regular· District 7 February 8, 1978' regular Distric t 11 February 8, 1978, regul a r ALL DIST!UCTS i!eports of: § Joint Chairman ~ General Man:iger General Counsel ) .. (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL voTE ....... -Consideration of roll cal I vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall • \ __ .1 be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each ...., District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) 1~ I I i JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page (_s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" and ''D'' DISTRICT NO. 6 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 7 See page (s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(NN) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as n~t requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent· calendar by a Director, staff member, or member· of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all m~tions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consen~ calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairm~n will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. 0~~~'1(0) -2-_ __f (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FILE ................ .. 'ElTER ............ , "-'IC .... TKLR .. .. .,..._ .. _ ............... .. '1 .,.,..,, flLE_,::···--~ (LETf~'6. .. ~. >JC .... TK LR .... ALL DISTRICTS "deration of Resolution No. 78-32, to receive and file bid tabulation a ion and awarding contract for Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 an , q-061A, to Compressor Service Company. in the amount of $115,570 .00. See p (b) ~"~ Consideration of Resolution No. 78-33, to r eceive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for New Fiberglass Ventilation System at Grit Chambers and Bar Screens, Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-063, to Hickman Bros., Inc. in the amount of $37,600.00. See page "E" FI LE ................. . LE TIER •....••....••• A/C ••.• TKl lt •... ~ ./ -·-H•ooooooo o oooooooO •O --··················-· FILE ........... """" LETIER ........... ,.. A/C .... TKlR ... . ~./ -·-·················· FILE ................. . LETIER ............. . A/C .... TKLR •••• FILEJ ................ .. LETIER ........... - A/C .... TKLR ·- .. ~ .. <-- . /"' FILE ................ .. ..____ LETIER ).~--~~-.~ · 'C .... TKLR .•.• ........................ -·-····················"' (c) (d) (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 78 -50, approving plans and specifica- tions for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1978. See page "F" Consideration of Resolution No. 78-34, approving plans and specifica- tions for Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No . 2, Job No. PW-065, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1978 . See page "G" Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration and Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-3B, providing for technical clarifications · (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-35, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation to reject all bids for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Admi ni stration and Engineering Building, Job No . J-7-3B, and authorizing the staff to negotiat e and ex ecute contract for said work in an amount. not to exceed $68,00 0. See p ag e "H" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-36, approving plans and specifica- tions for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, and authori z ing advertising for bids to be received on April 27, 19 78. Se e page "I" Consideration of Resolution No . 78-51, approving plans and specifica- tions for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge, Job No . P2-15-1A, and authorizing advertising for bids to be r e ceived on March 30, 1978. See page "J" (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Reclama- tion Plant No. 1, Job No. PW -055 -1, authorizing an addition of $306 .1 8 to the contract with Skippe r & Company for additional piping needed to make c austic de livery po s sible . See page "K" (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint r e Ca s e No. 28-39-16, Shaw and Sons vs. Skipper & Company, et al., in connection with Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No . 1, Job No . PW-055-1 , and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3 - (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) F .LL v LETTER ·······-···- A/~.--JKL R ~-~ -.~ /~ .. :····0·······~····513 ~---~- FILE ............... - LffiER ···-··- FILE ···········---· LETTER····-·- A/C .•.• TKLR - ••000000.000-•0H O O-- .................... -- FILE ....•..•••• - LETTER ..•.••. - A/C .... TKLR - FI LE ................ .. LETTER ............ " A/C ..•. TKLR ... . FILE -r ·······v \ETTER·····-- Al...,C •... TKLR / .. \ .... ~: ........... - l ; ~--····;::····-- LETTER ... \ (.• ......... L~-~..L Fl LE ···-···········- LETTER ···-······- I C .... TKLR --· ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive .bids and award Sale of Scrap Metal, Specification No. S-020, to .~ the highest responsiple bidder(s) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for a drive shaft for 36-inch raw sewage pump for Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, in an amount not to exceed $20,000 plus tax and freight (m) Consideration of motion authorizing reimbursement of expenses for Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, in connection with his presentation at the (n) Ocean Outfalls: A Critical Evaluation Seminar on April 18, 1978, in .Washington, D.C. sponsored by the Marine Water Quality Committee, WaterPollution Control Federation and the Federal Water Quality Association in conjunction with the American Oceanic Organization's National Ocean's Week (1) Consideration of motion ratifying trip of Superintendent and Associate Engineer to Chicago on Feb.ruary 41 & 22, 1978, for a construction conference relative to clarifications of the plans for Division 1, Oxygen Generation and Storage Facilities, and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-2; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (2) Consideration of motion authorizing out-of-state travel for District staff personnel in connection with inspection of major equipment items to be furnished for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with said inspections for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000 (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Twining Laboratories dated February 21, 1978, for materials evalua tion in connection with construction of 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, for a maximum fee not to exceed $25, 000. See page "L" (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. dated February 28, 1978, for concrete and soils testing services in connection with construction of 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, for a maximum fee not to exceed $45, 000. See page "M'' (p) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, authorizing deletion of $40,900.00 from the contract with Pascal & Lu~wig, Inc: for paving and electrical work tha t will be completed tmder Job No. P2-23-5. See page "N" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) ··-··..--- LETTER -·-··-···- A/C .•.• "TKlR ••.. ....................... - FILE ···········-·-(l~~-_:/ A/C •... "TKlR .•.• FILE ............ _ .• _ ~~/ A/C .... "TKLR ·- FILE ···-··-········/ ~~- A/C .... "TKLR .••. FI LE ·····:;:;:,"('J i@ ~-~-~--- A/C .... TKlR .... --···················· -\ l) / FILE ··-······--- LffiER ···---·-- A/C ~."TKLR ':. • ./ ~~~- FITT ...::::::__ LffiER "-::f'.u~ A/C .... "TKLR •••• FILE -~ LETTER.~ >.JC .... "TKLR •••• ···············-······- -·-····------- FILE ····:··"/"!"" lETTER nf:..L.. 'C .... "TKLR •.•• ("!) .· ..... Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and ·specifications for Operations Center for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-23-5, authorizing an addition of $40,900.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for additional paving and electrical work deleted from Job No. P2-23-l, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said work . See page "0" (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Geo -Structures in the amount of $115,153 .78 against C.H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical ·Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Kay's Operated Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $320.00 against C. H. Leavell & Company, contract for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Cooper Energy Services in the amolll1t of $24,673.08 against Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, contractor for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16 (u) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint re Case No. 284303, Bragg Crane and Rigging Co. vs. International Earp Labs, Inc., et al ., in connection with Districts' agreement with International Waste Systems, Inc. for operation of a sludge disposal demonstration plant; and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action (v) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals for engineering services for design of solids handling facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 in accordance with the Districts' Procedures for Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services. See page "P" (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-37, authorizing application for a Commercial BankAmericard and approving execution of BankAmericard Agreement -Businesses, to be us ed for expenses incurred in co nnection with approved out-of-area travel. See page "Q" .. (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-38, adopting prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors, as determined .by tbe Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations, until amendment or revocation of this resolution. Se e page "R" DISTRICT 2 (y) Conside ration of Standard Resolution No. 78-39-2, a uthorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 9.89 acres of territory to the District on Country Hill Road n ear Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, ,proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continue d from page 5) mr .iL--- ~-'.: ....... - ~~~-~:1~: .. :~ ---······-·············· FILE ·-·······-··-- LETTER ···········-· A/C •... TKLR -- FILE .... ~---:-- LETTER ••·••••••••••• A/C .... TKLR •·•• --·············· --·········· ············ FILE •...........•••••• LETTER .••.•••••••••• A/C .... TKLR ·-· Oo oooooooooooooooooH - FILE ---··· .. •nn11-: LETTER ·······-···- A/C .... TKLR ··- FILE ••..•••.•••• """ L~ ..•• !:' ..... .. A/C ••.. TKLR •••. .'.\: ........... , ........... . ~-······- LETTER L .....•••• - A/C ..•. TKLR .••• ~---~-~-~ ~-~-IJ-~W.,O DISTRICT 3 (z) Conside ration of Resolution No . 78-40-3, approving Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5118 (Rev.) with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately 135 sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $15,500.00 for said work. See page "S" (aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Re a ch 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing a change to the contra ct with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture, allowing substitution of 45-inch pipe for 42-inch pipe due to unavailability of 42-inch forms, at no cost to the District . See page ••r• (bb) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 2 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $4,949.00 from the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture. See page "lP' (cc) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No._ 2 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plas tic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trtmk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing an addition of $544.50 to the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for two pressure-type manhole frames and covers, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for installation of said equipment . See page "V" (dd) Cons i derat ion of motion approving Add endum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, providing for substitution of 39-inch VCP s tub for 36-inch VCP stub DISTRICT 5 (ee) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-42-5, approving Utilities Agreement No . 7UT-5160 with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately 100 sewer manhole s to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $11,500 .00 for said work . See p a ge "W" (ff) Consideration of Resolution No . 78-43-5, authorizing initiation of proceedings to detach territory from the Irvine Ranch Water District which was include d in Annexation No. 6 -Harbor View Hills, Sector IV, Annexation to County Sani tat.ion District No . 5, as requested by the Local Agency Formation Commission . See page "X" .DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (gg) Consideration of motion to receive and file Init i al Study re evalua tion of environmental impacts relative to the Santa Ana River Siphon; and authorizing staff to prepa re Negative Declaration and give notice thereof in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. See page "Y" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) -6- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) (.!)lE ... -~ iER ........ - C ,,,,ye~"" ':.'?.: .. ~< . __ -..#,,~,,~.~- Pll! ···--··---~E~ ~~.f..:Vw' A/C ,, .. TIW~ Ult -.. ..................... ·.·:::.~"."."." ........... uuH::;::::::• FI LE ············~ LETIER .j,_~.r ..... A/C •. ,.TKLR ·•·• ,/ ' l t,A~ ~:·.~~-·--.~~~ FILE ················w Q_m~--{~~ A/C .... TKLR .... '•() / Fl~E ~~ ~R o;·~ ~i'~ .~.~R1f~ -\ !FI LE ··········~ <l.enE~ AJC .••. TKLR •••• D,'lfll:~9; ..... - ~¥-~ DISTRICT 6 (hh) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-44-6, approving Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5175 with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately three sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $350.00 for said work. See page "Z" DISTRICT 7 (ii) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-45-7, authorizing initiation of .proceedings to annex 2.27 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, proposed Annexation No. 74 -Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) (jj) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-46-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 4.101 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Amapola Avenue and Ranchwood Trail in the City of Orange, proposed Annexa- tion No. 75 -Going Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (kk) Consideration of Standard ~esolution No. 78-47-7, ordering annexation of 1.859 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Hewes Road and Villa Park Road in the City of Orange, Annexation No. 64 - Reeve Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (11) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-48-7, ordering annexation of 3.397 acres of territory to the District on Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan Heights area, Annexation No. 67 -Cheek-Smith Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Roy Medina for annexation of . 784 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overhill, and refer to the staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 79 -Medina Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "M" (nn) Consideration of items relative to area-wide planning for Cow an Heights/Lemon Heights/Crawford Canyon area tributary to Peters Canyon: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit proposals and award a contract for preparation of an aerial topo- graphy of the area easterly of Newport Boulevard between Chapman Avenue and Irvine Boulevard, for an amount not to exceed $10,000 (2) Consideration of Resolution No . 78-52-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7, re annexation policy, as amended, providing for levy and collection of area-wide planning study fee of $100 per acre for the area generally described as easterly of Newport Boulevard betwee n Chapman Avenue and Irvine Boulevard tributary to Peters Canyon. See page "BB" END OF ··CONSENT ·.CAlENDAR -7- .. (10) ALL DISTRICTS \l..(11) ~Iv (12) Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any ALL DISTRICTS Report of Executive Coinmittee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: fllf ·················~, c.;@ ~?~·_·JM\ (a) ~~~=~~~~~t!~n p~!f:~~~~~a~p~~;~~:!r~~;i:~~ ~~~~~~~~~~r!~r Services, 7 ~-~ ~r~ by th~ Fiscal Policy.Committee. See page. "CC" . -·· FILE ···-······-····· (b) Consideration of actions r e evaluation of sludge dewatering alternatives: LETIER ···-········· A/C •.•. TKLR .... FILE ••.............••. UTTER ·······-···- /VC .... TKLR .... _ ...... -_. . .--- FILE it..F.. .... - LETIER ·············• A/C •.• .TKLR .••• --·-·············· .... -·-··-··········· .... - tf\\.5 (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to evaluate sludge dewatering alternatives Consideration of motion authorizing staff members designated by the General Manager to visit established dewatering installations for on-site evaluation of the systems; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith Consideration of motion authorizing the General engage outside engineering firms for consulting connection with evaluation of sludge dewatering for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 Manager to services in processes Consideration of actions r e County of Los Angeles request for sewage capacity for La Habra Heights area: .A'\\ S (l) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Los Angeles County Engineer, dated January 26, 1978, re sewage capacity for the La Habra Heights area. See page "DD" FILE ··········;·:;-:-·I / ff\\S ( 2 ) ~ Consideration of motion reaffirming the Boards' action of November 10, 1976, declaring that further considera tion of the request of the City of La Habra (and the County of Los Angeles) to serve the La Habra Heights area in Los Angeles County (>JC .~LR ..•• --················ ---·--················ FILE ···-·······-··-( d) lETIER ···-·······-f'{\ \ ~ A/C.@~· ··················· HUooooooooOOO' FILE ................ ... LETIER ........... .,, be deferred until the Districts' Environmental Impact Statement is completed and approved Consideration of actions re temporary appointment of Districts' representative on SCAG 208 Program Committee: (1) Consideration of motion approving appointment of retiring Director Frances Wood to represent the Districts on the SCAG 2 08 Program Committee through December 19, 1978 (2) A/C ••.. TKLR "" Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 78-49, authorizing payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses for Districts' representative on the SCAG 208 Program Committee . See page "EE" ---······-········· (EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE recommendations continued on page 9) -8- • (1 2) Exec uti ve Com mit tee r e c omm end a tion s c ontinue d f r om page 8 : 'Fil£ ____ ........ . LETTER •.• -........ . >JC _ .. TKLR .. . ---··-.... -·1•11 ____ ).. ....... . (e ) Conside ration o f a ctions re a pplica tion for wa iver of second a ry trea tm e nt r e quire ment s: tn\5 (1) Considera t ion of motion authorizing the s t a ff to pr oc e e d with filin g of appli ca tion for waiver of secondary trea tment requirements pu r suant to the 1977 Amend me nts t o the Federal Wat.er Pollution Control Act. (~ a\f ~~ ~ ... ~ .. Considera tion of motion a uthori zing the General ~ta n ag er t.o engage the s e rvices of consulting firms for the pu r pose of gathering the required informa tion to submit Di s tricts' application for waiver of s e condary trea t ment requireme nts, in an amount not to exceed $S0,000.00 LETTER •....••.•.••.. >JC -~.:~2 i1) · ~~~; ALL DISTRICTS -·-··-MTS Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director (F I LE ~-.'::::::..... '11\ of Finance fo r 6-month period ending December 31, 1977 (Copy enclosed with agenda ma terial) >JC .•.. TKl lf ,.... (14) ALL DISTRICTS ~-:.~~::: ti'\\:, Other business and co mmu nications or s upplemental agenda i terns, i-f.-any sul>Pi'El.\ENTAL AGENDA r (14) (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-32, to receive and file bid FI LE tabulation and recommendation to reject all bids for Gas Mixing Ro ll Ca ll Vote or Cast Compressors at Plants Nos. l and 2 , Job No. PW-061A, and Un animou s Ballot a uthorizing advertising for rebid for sai d equ ipment . See pa ges "I" and "II" Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and issue a purch~~er for printing of SO full-size and SO r educed-size of construction drawings of ~lajor Facilities for 7S MGD Improved Treatment at Pl ant No. 2, Job No . P2 -23 -6, f or t h e c ont ractor of said project and our inspection p ersonnel, for an amount not to exceed $S ,3S O.OO p lus t ax ·(lS) DIST RICT 1 Ot lle (16) DISTRICT 1 a ~~ns or supplemental agenda items , if any Consideration of motion to adjourn 1 :.5(11 (17) DISTRICT 2 0th business and c ommon'1.~ or supplemental a ge nd a items, if any (18) DISTRICT 2 FILE --··"""""' Consideration of motion to adj ourn 'J ·.5 '7 lETTER ···-~-··.. A/C ••.. TKLR •.•• ...... _ .................... . -···················· (19) DISTRICT 3 Other busines s and co rrununica tions or s uppl e mental a ge nda items: n\lS(l9)(a )(l ) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . 2 to the plans and and specification s for Or a nget.horpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach I S, JTEMSON SUPPLEM ENTA L AGENDA Co n t ract No . 3-22-1, changing Bid Item No. 1 from 2,S7S linear f eet t o 2 ,Sl 9 linear feet ITEMS ON ti\\[?9) (a) (2) Ul PY: ~~AGENO.t (.~"I~ v'" /Roll Ca ll Vote or Cas t l....'.:'.:..miy .... --Un animous Ballot Consideration of Resolution No. 78-41-3, to receive and file b id tabulation and recommendation , and awarding contract for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach lS, Contract No. 3-22-1, to Pascal & Ludwig , Inc. in the amoun t of $S40,287.00 . See A/C ... ~R ••.• \ q(. b) ~:::~::·:::::::::i~: pages "III" and "IV" \ crc..i..:. ) (20) DI STRICT 3 Con s ideration of motion to a djourn (21) DI ST I..CT S Oth e r 'busine ss a nd s-or s up pl eme ntal agend a it ems, if any (2 2) DISTRICT S Consideration of moti on to adjourn ~ '. e---D Dr s r luCT 6 ~. (23) Oth e r 'busine s s and c ommun ications or suppl eme ntal age nd a items, if any -9- .. (24) (25) (26) FILE ............ Q LmER ........ :y A/C -~7;{'···· DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn <6·, ~ Dis;rRICT 11 Ot er busines ~--sat.ions or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn '6 ·. 0 ( DISTRICT 7 Report of General Counsel re outstanding balance from Orange Park Acres Association re concurrent Annexation ·No . 51 and Bond authorization proceedings (28) DISTRICT 7 Other (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn g '. D"i -10- • 1 t ~--e·gARDS OF DIRECTORS • -County Sonitation Districts J II "'-' ~ ·of Orange County, California Post Off icct Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) _(6) (7) JOINT BOARDS Area Code 7141 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE MARCH 8, 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMM=DIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOirJING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Roll Call Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary Recognition of special guests Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, See supplemental agenda EACH DISTRICT. if any · Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 ·February 8, 1978, r.egular District 2 February 8, 1978, regular District 3 February 8, 1978, regular_ District 5 -February 8, 1978, regular District 6 February 8, 1978, regular~ District 7 -Februa;ry 8, 1978, regular District 11 -February 8, 1978, regular ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairm:m (b) General M;-na.ger (c) General ·counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint. and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND -See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" and "D" ---- DISTRICT NO. 6 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D" ------ DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS, 9(A) THROUGH 9(NN) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or· member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, ·and· casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular orde:r of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Co11sidcration of action to approve all agenda i tcms appearing on the consentr calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- ... ,_(9L.4(CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS ·dcration of Resolution No. 78-32, to receive and file bid tabulation a ion and awarding contract for Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 an , q-061A, to Compressor Service Company in the amount of $115,570.00. See p (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-33, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for New Fiberglass Ventilation System at Grit Chambers and Bar Screens, Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-063, to Hickman Bros., Inc. in the amount of $37 ,600. 00. See page "E" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-50, approving plans and specifica- tions for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1978. See page "F" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-34, approving plans and specifica- tions for Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-065, and authorizing advertising for bids to (e) (f) be received on March 30, 1978. See page ''G' Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration and Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-38, providing for technical clarifications Consideration of Resolution No. 78-35, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation to reject all bids for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration and Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-38, and authorizing the staff to negotiate and execute contract for said work in an amount not to exceed $68,000. See page "H" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-36, approving plans and specifica- tions for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April 27, 1978. See page "I" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-51, approving plans and specifica- tions for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge, Job No. P2-15-1A, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1978. See page "J" (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Reclama- tion Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1, authorizing an addition of $306.18 to the contract with Skipper & Company for additional piping needed to make caustic delivery possible. See page "K" (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file Sununons and Complaint re Case No. 28-39-16, Shaw and Sons vs. Skipper & Company, et al., in connection with Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award Sale of Scrap Metal, Specification No. S-020, to the highest responsible bidder(s) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to ncgotinte and issue a purchase order for a drive shaft for ·36-inch raw sewage pump for Hcadworks "C" at Plant No. 2, in an amount not to exceed $20,000 plus tax and freight (m) Consideration of motion authorizing reimbursement of expenses for Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, in connection with his presentation at the Ocean Outfalls: A Critical Evaluation Seminar on April 18, 1978, in Washington, D. C. sponsored by the Marine Water Quality Committee, Water.Pollution Control Federation and the Federal Water Quality Association in conjunction with the American Oceanic Organization's National Ocean's Week (n) (1) Consideration of motion ratifyin~ trip of Superintendent and Associate Engineer to Chicago on February 21 & 22, 1978, for a construction conference relative to clarifications of the plans for Division 1, Oxygen Generation and Storage Facilities, and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. ·2, Job No. P2-23-2; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (2) Consideration of motion authorizing out-of-state travel for District staff personnel in connection with inspection of major equipment items to be furnished for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with said inspections for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000 (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Twining Laboratories dated February 21, 1978, for materials evaluation in connection with construction of 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, for a maximum fee not .to exceed $25,000. See page "L" (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. dated February 28, 1978, for concrete and soils testing services in connection with construction of 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, for (p) a maximum fee not to exceed $45,000. See page "M" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, authorizing deletion of $40,900.00 from the contract with Pascal & Lu<lwig, Inc. for paving and electrical work that will be completed under Job No. P2-23-5. See page (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- "N" . •-{9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) ~LL DISTRICTS (Continued) (q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Operations.Center for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-S, authorizing an addition of $40,900.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for addi~ional paving and electrical work deleted from Job No. P2-23-l, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said work. See page "0" (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Geo-Structures in the amount of $115,153.78 against C.H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (s) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Kay's Operated Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $320.00 against C. H. Leavell & Company, contract for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file Stop Notice submitted by Cooper Energy Services in the amotmt of $24,673.08 against Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, contractor for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant·No. 1, Job No. Pl-16 (u) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint re Case No. 284303, Bragg Crane and Rigging Co. vs. International Earp Labs, Inc., et al., in connection with Districts' agreement with International Waste Systems, Inc. for operation of a sludge disposal demonstration plant; and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action (v) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals f~r engineering services for design of solids handling facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 in accordance with the Districts' Procedures for Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services. See page "P" (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-37, authorizing application for a Conunercial BankAmericard and approving execution of BankAmericard Agreement -Businesses, to be used for expenses incurred in connection with approved out-of-area travel. See page . "Q" .(x) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-38, adopting prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors, as determined by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations, until amendment or revocation of this resolution. See page "R" DISTRICT 2 (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-39-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex ·9.89 acres of territory to the District on Country Hill Road near Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 6) .. ·• -5- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) . ..... - ......._,.--_ _.. DISTRICT 3 (z) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-40-3, approving Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5118 (Rev.) with the State of California Department of Transportation to a<ljust approximately 135 sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $15,500.00 for said work. See page "S" (aa) Consideration of motion approving, Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Rc_ach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing a change to the contract with Kordick & Rados, a Joint Venture, allowing substitution of 45-inch pipe for 42-inch pipe due to unavailability of 42-inch forms, at no cost to the District. See page "T'' (bb) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $4,949.00 from the contract with Kordick & Rados; a Joint Venture. See page "U" (cc) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts, Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-lR-3, authorizing an addition of $544.50 to the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for two pressure-type manhole frames and covers, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for installation of said equipment. See page "V" (dd) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, providing for substitution of 39-inch VCP stub for 36-inch VCP stub DISTRICT 5 (ee) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-42-5, approving Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5160 with the State of California Department of Transportation.to adjust approximately 100 sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $11,500.00 for said work. See page "W" (ff) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-43-5; authorizing initiation of proceedings to detach territory from the Irvine Ranch Water District which was included in Annexation No. 6 -Harbor View Hills, Sector IV, Annexation to County Sanitat'ion District No. 5, as requested by the Local Agency Formation Commission. See page "X" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (gg) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study re evaluation of environmental impacts relative to the Santa Ana River Siphon; and authorizing staff to prepare Negative Declaration and give notice thereof in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. See page "Y" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) ... -6- ·~ (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) ---__ .::-_-, DISTRICT 6 (hh) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-44-6, approving Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5175 with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately three sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $350.00 for said work. See page "Z" DISTRICT 7 (ii) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-45-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 2.27 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, proposed Annexation No. 74 -Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) (jj) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-46-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 4.101 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Amapola Avenue and Ranchwood Trail in the City of Orange, proposed Annexa- tion No. 75 -Going Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (kk) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-47-7, ordering annexation of 1.859 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Hewes Road and Villa Park Road in the City of Orange, Annexation No. 64 - Reeve Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (11) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-48-7, ordering annexation of 3.397 acres of territory to the District on Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan Heights area, Annexation No. 67 -Cheek-Smith Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) (nun) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Roy Medina for annexation of .784 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overhill, and refer to the staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 79 -Medina Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "M" (nn) Consideration of items relative to area-wide planning for Cowan Heights/Lemon Heights/Craw~ord Canyon area tributary to Peters Canyon: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit proposals and award a contract for preparation of an aerial topo- graphy of the area easterly of Newport Boulevard between Chapman Avenue and Irvine Boulevard, for an amount not to exceed $10,000 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-52-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7, re annexation policy, as amended, providing for levy and collection of area-wide planning study fee of $100 per acre for the area generally described as easterly of Newport Boulevard between Chapman Avenue and ·Irvine Boulevard tributary to Peters Canyon. See page "BB" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -7- (IO) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS --~--" Consideration of action on items reconunended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion approving revised Procedures for Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. See page "CC" (b) Consideration of actions re evaluation of sludge dewatering alternatives: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to evaluate sludge dewatering alternatives (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff members designated by the General Manager to visit established dewatering installations for on-site evaluation of the systems; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to engage outside engineering firms for consulting services in connection with evaluation of sludge dewatering processes for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 \..;J (c) Consideration of actions re County of Los Angeles request for sewage capacity for La Habra Heights area: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Los Angeles County Engineer, dated January 26, 1978, re sewage capacity for the La Habra Heights area. See page "DD" (2) Consideration of motion reaffirming the Boards' action of November 10, 1976, declaring that further consideration of the request of the City of La Habra (and the County of Los Angeles) to ·serve the La Habra Heights area in Los Angeles County be deferred until the Districts' Environmental Impact Statement is completed and approved (d) Consideration of actions re temporary appointment of Districts' representative on SCAG 208 Program Committee: (1) Consideration of motion approving appointment of retiring Director Frances Wood to represent the Districts on the SCAG 208 Program Committee through December 19, 1978 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-49, authorizing payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses for Districts' representative on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. See page "EE" ~ (EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE recommendations continued on page 9) -8- ··. (12) Executive Committee recommendations continued from page 8: (e) Consideration of actions re application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to proceed with filing of application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements pursuant to the 1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to engage the services of consulting firms for the purpose of gathering the required information to submit Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment requirements, in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for 6-month period ending December 31, ·1977 (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (14) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (17) DISTRICT 2 -Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 3 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-41-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Orangethorpe Relief Tru~k Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, to in the amount of $ (Bid opening 3/7/78 -See Supplemental Agenda) (20) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 6 Other business and commtmications or supplemental agenda items, if any -9- (24) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 7 Report of General Counsel re outstanding balance. from Orange Park Acres Association re concurrent Annexation ·No·. 51 and Bond authorization proceedings (28) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- I BOARDS OF DlnECTORS County Sonitotlon Districts Post OHicc Box 8127 of Oron9c County, Celifornio 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountoin Volley, Calif., 9270S Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Ano Code 71.C S.C0-2910 962-2.Cl 1 AGENDA MEETING DATE MARCH 8J 1978 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTO~ DES IRI NG ADD ITI ONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WI LL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMM=DIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING I N THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOirlING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM , (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Recognition of special gues ts (S) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any DISTRICT 7 ITEMS ON (S) Con sideration o f mo t ion to receive a nd fi l e mi nute excerpt from the Costa Mesa Sanit a r y Di s trict r e appointmen t of Elvin Hu t chinson as a lte rnate Direct or to Francis H. Glockner SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA (6) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes cf the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 February 8, 1978, regular District 2 February 8, 1978, regular District 3 February 8, 1978, regular District s February 8, 1978, regular District 6 February 8, 1978, regular· District 7 February 8, 1978, regular ,.A' /" ').) CIF f.t __ , February 8, 1978, regular .~ ~· JJ-~ I}) -{I p~ / ~ f I\~ '\}~~JP} 1 ~9~~ ~ v· ~v 0 \ 'V,'v.y (7) ALL DISTllICTS . \I i!cports of: District 11 \~~lJ---:=» (a) (b) I I~· .I\~ · Joint Chainn:m '--..~ Q~ " General Mannger · (c) General Counsel ----/ '· (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CALL voTE ••• --Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each ~ District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "C" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 6 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "B" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (9) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(A) THROUGH 9(NN) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as n~t requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consen~ calendar shall be considered in the regular orde:r of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I~ Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. I 1 I i· Roll Call Vote or Cast I Unanimous Ballot i Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS of Resolution No. 78-32, to receive and file bid tabulation ion and awarding contract for Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 an , -061A, to Compressor Service Company. in the amount of $115,570.00. See p CbY Consideration of Re-solution No. 78-33, to receive and file bid ~ tabulation and recoDDllendation and awarding contract for New Fiberglass Ventilation System at Grit Chambers and Bar Screens, Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-063, to Hickman Bros., Inc. in the amol.lllt of $37,600.00. See page "E" Consideration of Resolution No. 78-50, approving plans and specifica- tions for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1978. See page "F" Consideration of Resolution No. 78-34, approving plans and specifica- tions for Modification of Headworks "C'-' Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-065, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1978. See page "G". · · 7 /Consideration of motion approvin.g Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration and Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-38, providing for technical · clarifications · '~Consideration of Resolution No. 78-35, to receive and file bid ~J tabulation and recommendation to reject all bids for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration and Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-38, and authorizing the staff to negotiate and execute contract for said work in an amotmt.not to exceed $68,000. See p_age "H'' ,1 Consideration of Resolution No. 78-36, approving plans and specifica- tions for· Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on April 2 7, 1978. See page "I" ,h/Consideration of Resolution No. 78-51, approving plans and specifica- / tions for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge, Job No. P2-15-1A, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received /ion March 30, 1978. See page "J" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Interpl~t Odor Control Facilities at Reclama- tion Plant No. 1, Job No. -PW-055-1, authorizing an addition of $306.18 to the contract with Skipper & Company for additional piping needed to make caustic delivery possible. See page "K" Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint re Case No. 28-39-16, Shaw and Sons vs.· Skipper & Company, et al., in connection with Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1, and refer to the Districts•· General Counsel for appropriate action (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (k) / )1) (p) I Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award Sale of Scrap Metal, Specification No. S-020, to the highest responsible bidder(s) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for a drive shaft for 36-inch raw sewage pump for Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, in an amount not to exceed $20,000 plus tax and freight Consideration of motion authorizing reimbursement of expenses for Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, in connection with his presentation at the Ocean Outfalls: A Critical Evaluation Seminar on April 18, 1978, in Washington, D.C. sponsored by the Marine Water Quality Committee, WaterPollution Control Federation and the Federal Water Quality Association in conjunction with the American Oceanic Organization's National Ocean's Week (1) Consideration of motion ratifying trip of Superintendent and Associate Engineer to Chicago on February ~l & 22, 1978, for a construction conference relative to clarifications of the plans for Division 1, Oxygen Generation and Storage Facilities, and Division 2, Oxygen Dissolution Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2, Job No. P2-23-2; and authorizing reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection therewith (2) Consideration of motion authorizing out-of-state travel for District staff personnel in connection with inspection of major equipment items to be furnished for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with said inspections for a maximum amount not to exceed $25,000 (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Twining Laboratories dated February ?l, 1978, for materials evaluation in connection with construction of 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, for a maximum fee not to exceed $25,000. See page ''U' (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. dated February 28, 1978, for concrete and soils testing services in connection with construction of 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, for a maximum fee not to exceed $45,000. See page "M" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-23-l, authorizing deletion of $40,900.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for paving and electrical work that will be completed under Job No. P2-23-5. See page "N" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) .ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center for 75 MGD .Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job ·No. P2-23-5, authorizing an addition of $40,900.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. for additional paving and electrical work deleted from Job No. P2-23-l, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for complet.ion of said work. See page "0" I . rd .Consideration of motion to receive and file S~op Notice submitted by /r Geo-Structures in the amount of. $115,153. 78 against .C. H. Leavell & Company, contractor for Electrical· Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 . (..{":Consideration of motion to· receive and file Stop Notice submitted /J by Kay's Operated Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $320.00 against C. H. Leavell & Company, contract for Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3 /' Consideration of motion to receive and file St~p Notice submitted by Cooper Energy Services ·in the amount ·of $24,673.08 against Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, contractor for 46 MGD Activated ludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16 Consideration of motion to receive and file SUJJUllons and Complaint re ase No. 284303, Bragg Crane and Rigging Co. vs. International Earp Labs, Inc., et.al., in connection with Districts' agreement with International Waste Systems, Inc. for operation of a sludge disposal demonstration plant; and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action r~ Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to solicit proposals _/' for engineering services for design of solids .handling facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 in accordance with the ~istricts' Procedures for Selection of Professional Engineering l ·and Architectural Services. See page "P" Consideration of Resolution No. 78-37, authorizing application for a Commercial BankAmericard and approving execution of BankAmericard Agreement -Businesses, to·be used for ·expenses incurred in connection with approved out-of-area travel. See page "Q" C/i .(x) ~onsideration of Resolution No. 78-38, adopting prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors, as determine4.PY.tbe Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations, until amendment or revocation of this resolution. See page "R" DISTRICT 2 . (y) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-39-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 9.89 acres of territory to the District on Country Hill Road near.Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, _proposed Annexation No. 30 -Tract No. 10167 to County Sanitation District No. 2 (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page_6) -5- (9) (CONSEN'J;' CALENDAR continued from page 5) DISTRICT 3 ~Consideration of Resolution No. 78-40-3, approving Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5118 (Rev.) with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately 135 sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not ito exceed $15,, 500. 00 for said work. See page "S" r Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1. to the plans and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7,, Contract No. 3-20-3,, authorizing a change to·the contract with Kordick & Rados,, a Joint Venture, allowing substitution of 45-inch pipe for 42-inch pipe due to unavailability of 42-inch forms,, at no cost to the District. See page "T'' / '~Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans ./IJ .1 and specifications for Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7,, Contract No. 3-20-3,, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $4,,949.00 from the contract Jd) with Kordick & Rados,, a Joint Venture. See page "U1' ~/ Consideration of motion approving Change Order·No •. 2 to the plans and specifications for Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts,, Miller-Holder Tnmk,, Contract No. 3-lR-3,, authorizing an addition of $544.50 to the contract with F. B. Cook Corporation for two pressure-type manhole frames and covers, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for installation of said equipment. See page "V" Consideration. of. motion approving:. Addendum No. 1 to the plans .and· specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer,, Reach 15,, Contract No. 3-22-1,, providing for substitution of 39-inch VCP stub for 36-inch VCP stub DISTRICT 5 (e~onsideration of Resolution No. 78-42-5,, approving Utilities .)7-, Agreement No. 7UT-5160 with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately 100 sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $11,,500.00 for said work. See page "W" (;£),-Consideration of Resolution No. 78-43-5, authorizing initiation of ~ proceedings to detach territory from the Irvine Ranch Water District which was included in Annexation No. 6 -Harbor View Hills, Sector IV, Annexation to County Sanitat'ion District No. 5, as requested by the Local Agency Fonnation Commission. See page "X" ·DISTRICTS.·5 & 6 (gg) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study re evaluation of environmental impacts relative to the Santa Ana River Siphon; and authorizing staff to prepare Negative Declaration and give notice thereof in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,, as amended. See page "Y" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) -6- (9) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) DISTRICT 6 (hh) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-44-6, approving Utilities· Agreement No. 7UT-5175 with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust approximately three sewer manholes to grade; and authorizing payment in an amount not to exceed $350.00 for said work. See page "Z" DISTRICT 7 ii) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-45-7, authorizing initiation of .proceedings to annex 2.27 acres of territory to the· District in the vicinity of the southerly corner of East Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive, proposed Annexation No. 74 -Nelson Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (to also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-46-7, authorizing initiation of .proceedings to annex 4.101 acres of territory to the District in·the vicini~y of the southwest corner of Amapola Avenue and Ranchwood Trail in the City of Orange, proposed Annexa- tion No. 75 -Going Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (k~) Consideration of Standard ~esolution No. 78-47-7, ordering annexation // of 1. 859 acres of· territory to the District in the vicinity of Hewes Road and Villa Park Road in the City of Orange, Annexation No. 64 - Reeve Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (lv0onsideration of Standard Resolution No. 78-4.8-7, ordering annexation of 3.397 acres of territory to the District on Ladera Senda Lane in the Cowan Heights area, Annexation No. 67 -Cheek-Smith Annexation to County Sanitation District Ne.·7 (to also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) '~onsideration of motion to receive and file request from Roy Medina rJ for annexation of .784 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Sirrine Drive and Overhill, and refer to the staff for study and recommendation, ·proposed Annexation No. 79 -Medina Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 ·(to also be annexed to the·70th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "AA" f n~ Consideration of items relative to area-wide planning for Cowan /Y"·J Heights/Lemon Heights/Crawford Canyon area tributary to Peters Canyon: 0.-3""/ Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit /' proposals and award a contract for preparation of an aerial topo- graphy of the area easterly of Newport Boulevard between Chapman Avenue and Irvine Boulevard, for an amount not to exceed $10,000 )2) Consideration of Resolution No. 78-52-7, amending Resolution No. 75-44-7, re annexation policy,. as amended, providing for levy and collection of area-wide planning study fee of $100 per acre for the area generally described as easterly of Newport Boulevard between Chapman Avenue and Irvine Boulevard tributary to Peters Canyon. See page "BB" END· ·OF ·CONSENT. CAlENDAR -7- ffl (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any rvr( ALL. DISTRICTS ~-J Report of Executive Coimnittee and consideration of motion to receive and fi.le the Committee's written r~port (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) / / (b) Consideration of motion approving revised Procedures for Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. See pa·ge "CC" Consideration of actions re evaluat.ion of sludge dewatering alternatives: c.r\/ Consideration of motion authorizing staff to evaluate sludge ~-~ dewatering alternatives ,/ Consideration of motion authorizing staff members designated r) by the General. Manager to·visit established dewatering installations for on-site evaluation of the systems; and authorizing reimbursement of travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith /' ~ Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to engage outside engineering firms for consulting services in connection with .evaluation of sludge dewatering processes · for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 (c) Consideration of actions re County of Los Angeles request for sewage capacity for La Habra Heights area: C~Y' Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from ~ Los Angeles County Engineer, dated January 26, 1978, re /sewage capacity for the La Habra Heights area. See page "DD" "7 2)1/ Consideration of motion reaffirming the Boards' action of November 10, 1976, declaring that further consideration of the request of the City of La Habra (and the Col.lllty o~ Los Angeles) to serve the La Habra Heights area in Los Angeles County be deferred until the Districts• Environmental Impact Statement is completed and approved (d) Consideration of actions re temporary appointment of Districts' representative on SCAG 208 Program Conunittee: // __.-(1'.] Consideration of motion approving appointment of retiring l Director Frances Wood to represent the Districts on the SCAG 208 ,/ 1/:::::r::::t::e ~::::o~::~::_::: ::::orizing payment of Roull car11 Vote 8°r11 cra fees and reimbursement of expenses for Districts·' representative nan mous a o • . on the SCAG 208 Program Committee. See page "EE" (EXEClITIVE COMMITTEE recommendations continued on page 9) -8- (12) Executive Committee r cconune nd :itions con tinued from p:igc 8: (e) Consideration of action s re application for waiver of seconda ry treatme nt requirements: Consideration of motion authorizing th e staff to proceed with filing of app lication fo r wa ive r of second ary treatment requir emen t s pursuant to the 1977 Amendments to the Federal Wa ter Pollution Control Ac t (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General ~~nager to engage the services of consulting firm s for th e purpose of ~ gathe ring the require d information to s u bm it Districts' application for waiver of secondary treatment r equiremen ts, in an amolDlt not to exceed $SO,OOO.OO (13) ALL DISTRICTS Conside ration of motion to r eceive and file fin ancial report of Director of Finance for 6-month period endin g December 31, 1977 (Copy enc losed with agenda materia l) (14) ALL DISTRICTS ~Other bus i ness and commu n ications or supplementa l agenda items, if any 14)(a) Consideration of Reso lution No . 78-32, to receive and fil e bid :TEMSON SUPPL'EMEN TAL AGENDA t a bulation and recommendation to reject all bids for Gas Mixing Roll Call Vote or Cast Compressors at Plants Nos . 1 and 2, Job No. PW-061A, and Unanimous Ballot authorizing advertising for rebid for said equipment . See pages "I" and "I I" (14)(b) ITEMS ON / SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negoti ate and issue a purchase order for printing of SO full-size and SO r educed-size sheets of construction drawings of Major Facilities for 7S MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-23-6, for the contractor of said project and our inspe ction personnel, for an amolDlt not to exceed $5,350 .00 plus tax ·(15) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or s upp lemental agenda it ems, if any / CJ.6) DIST RICT 1 • ·'\:, ,/" Consideration of motion to adjourn ~ ,-..., (17) DI STRI CT 2 -Other business and communications or s upplemental agenda items, if any (1,,81,/"DISTRICT 2 ./"' Consideration of motion to adjourn ·1 .~ (19) DISTRICT 3 ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Other bus iness and communications or supplemental agenda items: (19)(a)(l) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No . 2 to the plans and and specifications for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 15, Contract No. 3-22-1, changing Bid Item No . 1 from 2 ,575 linear feet to 2,519 linear feet -9- .. ,; (24( DISTRICT 6 l' Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (2~ISTRICT 11 · : ~ -Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 7 Report of General Counsel re outstanding balance from Orange Park Acres Association re concurrent Annexation·No. 51 and Bond authorization proceedings (28) DISTRICT 7 Other business and colDIDWlications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- II BOARDS OF DIRE CTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Offi ce Box 812 7 of Orange County, Ca lifornia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9 2708 Te lephones: JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEfY'ENTAL AGENDA ITE MS MARCH 8, 197 8 -7:30 P.M. DISTRICT 7 Area Code 714 54 0-2910 962-2411 AGE NDA (5) Con sideration of motion to receive and fi l e minute excerpt from the Costa Mesa Sanitary Di strict r e appoin tment of Elvin Hutchinson as alternate Director to Francis H. Gl ockner ALL DISTRICTS (14) (a ) (14) (b) DISTRICT 3 Considera tion of Resolution No. 78-32, to recP-ive and fi le bid tabulation and recommendation to r eject a ll bids fo r Gas Mixin g Co mp ress ors at Plants Nos . 1 and 2, J ob No . PW -06 1A, a n d author i zing adve rtisin g for rebid for said equipment. See p ages "I1' an d "I I" Con s ideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and is s ue a pu rch a~~der for pr i n t in g of 50 fu ll-siz e and SO redu c ed-size~ of construction drawings of Ma jor Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatrne'nt at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2 -23-6, for the contra c tor of said project and our in s pe ct i on per sonnel , for an amount not to exceed $5,350.00 plus t ax (19)(a )(l) Con side r atio n of motion approving Add e ndum No. 2 to the plans and and specifications for Or a n gethorpe Re lief Trunk Sewer, Re a ch 15, Con tract No . 3-22 -1, changing Bid It em No . 1 from 2 ,5 75 linear feet to 2,5 19 linear feet (1 9)(a)(2) Consideration of Resolution No . 78 -41-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recomm e ndation, a n d awarding contract for Or angethorpe f{elief Trun k Sewer, Rea c h 15, Contract No . 3-22 -1 , to P3scal & Ludwig, Inc. in the amount of $540 ,287.00 . See p ages "I I I" and "IV" ;~ . .,!O --; II I II RESOLUTION NO. 78-32 ·REJECfING ALL BIDS FOR GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. PW-061A A RESOLtrrION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. PW-061A * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. PW-061A, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on February 21, 1978, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and WHEREAS, the bids have been evaluated by the Districts' engineers and it has been determined that said bids did not comply with the plans and speci- fications; and WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has this day submitted a written rec01nmendation that said bids be rejected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That all bids received for said work be hereby rejected and that all bid bonds be returned to the bidders; and ·section 3. That the staff be authorized to advertise and rebid for Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 under Job No. E-092. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DJSTRICTS II I II B I D ·r /\ n u r, /\ '11 I o N ~> H E E T JOB NO. PW-061A February ?l, 1978 11:00 A.M. PROJECT TITLE GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 & 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Supplying all labor; msterials, equipment & services for construc~ion, in a complete and operational condition. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $118,ooo .BUDGET AMOUNT$ --------------- REMARKS 1. 2. 3. 4. "JI" ------------------------------- CONTRACTOR Compressor Service Company Los·Angeles, California Benz Engineer~ng Inc. Montebello, California TOTAL BID $115,570.00 $133,848.00 I recommend rejecting all bids for the Gas Mixing Compressors at Plants Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. PW-061A. The proposals do not comply with the plans and specifications. AGENDA ITFM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "JJ" RESOLUTION NO. 78-41-3 APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 3-22-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AWARD OF ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACH 15, CONTRACT NO. 3-22-1 * * ·* * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by.Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's Engineers, and concurred in by the.Chief Engineer, that award of contrac~ be made to PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. for construction of ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACH 15, CONTRACT NO. 3-22-1, tabulation of bids, and the proposal for said·work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That award of contract to Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. in the total amount of $540,287.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, be approved; and Section 3. That the Chairman and· Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. "Ill"· AGENDA ITEM #19(A)(2) -DISTRICT 3 "III" B I D T A B u L A T I 0 N .... \.>-· -., March 7_, ;i.978 S H E E T 11:00 A.M. . CONTRACT NO. 3-22-1 PROJECT TITLE ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, REACH 12 u PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnishing all plant, materials, equipment, supplies and labor for the construction of a trunk sewer line and appurtenances in Orangethorpe Avenue from Knott Avenue to Western Avenue. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 702,150 BUDGET AMOUNT $ --------------- REMARKS ----------------~------------- CONTRACTOR 1. Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. Upland 2. Bebek Co. Irvine 3. Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture Irvine 4. Christeve Corp. Arcadia 5. John A. Artukovich & Son, Inc. Azusa 6. Sully Miller Contracting Company Long Beach 7. Colich & Sons, A Joint Venture · Gardena 8. Falcon Construction Corp. Los Angeles 9 • Andrew Papac & Son South·El Monte 10. II IV" AGENDA ITEM #19<A)(2) -DISTRICT 3 ' TOTAL BID 572,000. 578 ,.053. 607,258. 609,255. 628,865. 659,099. 695,530. 739,082.50 "IV" ·11 • MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Box 8 127 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date March 8, 1978 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Te lephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which ap pear on the enclosed a g enda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report , we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. Joint Boards No. 9-b Award of Contract No. PW-063. Bids were received on February 23rd for new Fiberglass Ventilation System at the Grit Chambers and Bar Screen Areas at the Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2. Seven bids were received which ranged from a low of $37,600 to a maximum of $64,657. Plans for this improvement were prepared by the staff with an engineer's estimate of $34,000 . Althoug h the low bid is 11% over the engineer's estimate, the low bid , submitted by Hickman Bros ., Inc., of Los Angeles, in the staff's opinion, is the lowest and most responsible bid received for the work as specified. Therefore we recommend award of the contract to Hickman Bros ., Inc., of Los Angeles in the amount of $37,600. No. 9-c -Approval of Plans and Specifications for Job No. PW-064A. This project is for furnishin g and installing one Plant air compressor with concrete skid and all associated appurtenances. This it em was included in th e 1977-7 8 fiscal year budg et (budget amount $80,000) which will add additional air supplies to the presently d e ficient s y ste m at Plant No . 2. Bids will be opened on March 30th. Engineer's estimate for this project is $40,000. No. 9-d -Approval of Plans and Specifications for J o b No. PW -065. This project is for the removal of a portion of the existing grit hopper assembly a nd th e fabrication and installation of a modifi ed grit assembly to replace the deteriorated portions at Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2. Plans and spec ifications for this ~reject were prepared by staff with an engineer 's estimate of ~20,000. Bids will be received and opened on March 30, 1978. No . 9-e -Addendum No. 1 to Job No. J-7 -3B. This Addendum No. 1 to the Replacement of Air Conditioning for the Administration and Engineering Building clarifies certain technical requirements which were broug ht to the staff's attention during the bidding period. The Addendum clarifies the contractor's obligations as to roof openings , removal and replacement of acoustical tile and the furni shing and installation of line voltage conduit and wiring. The staff recommends .approval of Addendum No. 1 to the bid documents. No. 9-f -Receipt of Bids for Job No . J -7-3B . Two bids were received on February 23rd for the installation of the air conditioning system for the Administration/Engineering Building. The bids submitted were $73,800 and $79,850, compared to the engineer's estimate of $60,000. Since only two bids were received for this work, the staff is recommending that the bids be rejected and that the General Manager be authorized to negot iate a contract for the work as specified in a n amount not to exceed $68,000. It is the staff's opinion that the two bids received may not reflect a competitive price for the work to be done. No . 9-g -Appr~val of Plans and Specifications for Job No. J-13 -2. Plans and specifications for the Additions to the Warehouse were prepared by the outside architectural firm of Miyake, Leece , Wood & Associates. This project will add approximately 2,200 square feet to the existing warehouse to accommodate warehouse personnel and the purchasing operation. The architects' estimate for this proj e ct is $125,000 (1977-78 budget -$1 50 ,000). Bids will be received and opened on April 27th. No . 9-h -Approving Plans and Sp ec ifications for Job No. P2-15-1A. In June of last year, the Boards a uthorized the · staff to negot i ate for the purchase of a new sludge centrifuge to accom- modate the dewatering of additional sludge volumes. The authori- zation for the purchase was not to exceed $245,000 which included -2- the centrifuge , motor and starter plus tax and freight. The staff successfu lly negotiated a contract for the purchase of a centrifuge for approximately $211,000 exclusive of the necessary motor and starter. It was determined to be more economical to purchase the motor exclusive of the centrifuge, thereby avoiding the centrifuge manufacturer's mark-up on a buy-out item. The engineer's estimate for this equipment purchase is $15,000. Bids are schedu l ed to be opened March 30th. No. 9-k -Authorizing Sale of Scrap Metal and Surplus Materials. In accordance with the Districts' current purchasing resolu- tion, we are asking for authority to receive bids and to award the sale of scrap metal and surplus materials. These materials are accumulated and are sold to the highest bidder when a substantial amount is collected. It is estimated that the sale of this material will result in bids of approximately $3,000. II C" No. 9-1 -Purchase of Main Sewage Pump Shaft for Headworks at Plant No. 2. Recently, one of the main raw sewage pump shafts failed which makes the pump inoperative to accommodate incoming flows to Plant No. 2. The staff is requesting authorization for the General Manager to i ssue a purchase order for the replacement of this shaft in an amount not to exceed $20,000 plus tax and freight. This authorization is requested because of the necessity to repair this pump as soon as possible. No. 9-m -Authori za tion for Reimbursement of Travel Expense for Director of SCCWRP to Participate in National Oceans Week Seminar. On April 1 8th in Washington, D.C., the Marine Water Quality Committee of the Water Pollution Control Federation is sponsoring a one-day seminar in conjunction with National Oceans Week. The purpose is to bring together n ationally-recognized authorities on discharges to the marine environment to inform legis lative staff members, EPA personnel and environmental activist g roups as to the known effects of ocean outfall discharges. EPA regulations con- cerning ocean discharge secondary treatment waiver requirements will not be finalized until after this seminar, therefore, we believe this will produce some positive results in favor of public entities op era ting ocean outfalls. This one-day seminar wi ll address current and proposed marine outfall regu lations (1977 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act), current ocean outfall practices, effects on marine biota, sediments, and on the water column, alternatives to marine outfalls and the e nviro-economic impacts. -3- As a member of the Marine Water Qua l ity Cormnittee, your Ge n era l Manager has prevailed o n the Director of the Southern Ca l iforni a Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) to be a key s p eaker along with John Bryson, Chairman of the California S tate Water Resources Control Board. Since this i s a sing le p urpose trip and SCCWRP 's travel budget is tight , I am request - i ng t hat the Boards authorize reimbursement to SCCWRP for Mr. Bascom's expenses for travel and incidentals . No. 9 -n -Out of State Travel and Expenses in Connect i on wi t h Job No. P2-23 . Th e Major Facilities, along with the Oxygen Generation and Di ssolution Equipment for the 75 -mgd of Improved Treatment at P l ant No. 2 are two contracts which have been awarded in excess o f $38 mi l lion. Much of the major equipment to be supplied will b e ma n ufactured out of the State of California, requiring on-site inspection by the Districts' engineers and inspection personnel . The Oxygen Generation and Dissolution Equipment will be manu - f actured in Al l entown, PA anq some of the other major equipment that i s scheduled to be furnished by the contractors wi ll be manu factured in the eastern part of the United States . The item appearing on the agenda is to authorize the out-of -state travel for Districts' personne l in connection with the i nspect i on o f this major equipment in an amount not to exceed $25,000 . Included in t hi s authorization is the ratificatiqn of the Superintendent and an Assoc i ate En g ineer's recent trip to Chicag o (February 21 and 22) for a construction conference re l ative to the Oxygen Gener ation and Disso l ution Equi pment. No . 9 -o -· Testing L aboratory Services for Job No . P2 -23. Pursuant to the Boards' a u thorization, the staff has so l icited a n d received responses from five soi l s and mater i als testing l aboratories to perform the necessary services required during the c o n struction of 75-mgd of Improved Treatment at Plant No . 2 . Of the five firms submitting proposals in response to the Districts' r equest, Southern California Soils and Testing Laboratories, Inc ., a n d Twin ing L a bora tories subm i tted the lowes t schedules of fees. I t is, therefore, recommended that the soils and concrete testing b e awarded to Sou thern California Soils and Testing, Inc ., of I rvi ne, for the per diem fees stipulated in their letter for a maximum amount n ot to excee d $45,000 and that for the materials eva l uat i on, award be mad e to Twinin g Laboratories pursuant to th e i r per diem f ee schedule in a maximum amount not to exceed $25 ,000. This work will be performed over a three-year period and i s grant fundable under the provisions of the construction grant. -4- Nos . 9-p & 9-q -Change Order No. 5 to Job No. P2-23-l and Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P2-23 -5. Two of the five contracts for the 75-mgd of Improved Treat- ment at Plant No. 2 have been awarded to the same contractor, Pasqual & Ludwig, Inc. There are certain items of work to be completed under Contract No. P2-23-l (Flood Wall & Site Improve- ments) which cannot be completed until subsequent work is finished on Contract No. P2 -23-5 (Operations Center). It is, therefore, recommended that the work to be performed under Contract No. P2 -23-l be deleted and the same work be added to Contract No. P2 -23 -5. This wil l aid in finalizing Contract No . P2-23-l within the next sixty days as Contract No. P2 -23 -5 is not scheduled for completion until mid-summer. These change orders have been tentatively approved by the State Water Re - sources Control Board and the staff recommends the action appearing on the agenda. No. 9 -v Services for Improve Trea tment Th e Distri cts are in receipt of a grant offer to design additional dig estion and solids dewatering facilities to process the increased sol~ds from the secondary treatment facilities presently under construction at Plant No. 2. The estimated eligible project cost for these facilities is $12.6 million. Solids dewatering facilities were not included in the original contract pending completion of the JPL -ACTS evaluation report. Although the activated carbon treatment system offers certain advantag es, it is felt that the process has not been developed sufficiently to meet the time schedules necessary to accommodate t h e residual solids when the secondary treatment facilities at P l ant No . 2 are complete and operational. It is requested that the staff be authoriz e d to solicit proposals pursuant to adopted procedures for selection of eng ineering s e rvices and that the responses be submitted to the Selection Co mmittee for recomm e nda- tion to the Board s for an eng ineering contract. It is anticipated that the Selection Committee can make a recommendation at the May Board meeting . No. 9-w -Authorizing Use of BankAmeric a rd for Exlenses Incurred in Conn ec tion with Approved Out-of-Area Trave . The staff is recommending approval of the use of BankAm e ricard for expense s incurred on Di s trict business out of Orang e County. The District ma inta in s a $1 ,000 petty cash account; however, there are numerous occa s ions when the petty cash checking account is either de pl e t e d or the timing is such that a check is not a con- venient way to advance travel expenses. -5- We are requesting authority to make application for credit cards for the four management positions. These cards wil l be utilized only on approved out-of-county business. No. 9-x -Prevailing Wage Rates for Public Works Contracts. Included with your agenda material i s the standard annual resolution estab li shing the prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors to al l classifications of workmen employed on public works contracts on Districts' projects. Adoption of this reso- lution authorizes the secretary to post the resolution and in- corp orate these wage rates in all Districts' contracts. District No. 2 No. 9-y -Initiating Proceedings for Annexation No. 30. Thi s proposed annexation contains 9.893 acres on Country Hill Road near Mohler Drive in the Santa Ana Canyon area of the City of Anaheim. The applicant has paid al l necessary annexation fees and the staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78 -39 -2 authorizin g initiation of proceedings to annex this proposed residenti al development as the zoning is in conformance with the District's Master Plan. Districts 3, 5 and 6 Nos. 9-z, ee, hh -Utility Agreements with Ca l Trans and Di stricts 3, 5 and 6. As a condition of the encroachment permits issued by Cal Trans for the installation of the Districts' sewer facilities in State Hi g hway rights of way, the Districts are contractually obligated to pay for the re l ocation of any Districts' facilities therein. The staff recommends approval of these utilities agree- ments for the adjustments of manhole covers which are required as part of the resurfacing program of Ca l Trans. These utility agreements are in the three affected Di stricts as follows: Distri ct 3 5 6 Location Beach Blvd. & Imp eri a l Highway Pacific Coast Highway Newport Boulevard -6- Estm.Co st. $15,500 11,500 350 District No. 3 No. 9-aa -Change Order No. 1 -Contract No. 3 -20-3. The pipe supplier to the general contractor has submitted a request to substitute 45" RCP in lieu of the specified 42" RCP size. This substitution affects the extension of the Knott Interceptor .northerly of Orangethorpe as wel l as the Orangethorp e Relief Sewer between Knott and Western. The staff recommends approval of this change order at no additional cost to the District. No. 9-bb -Ch ange Order No . 2 to Contract No. 3-20-3 . Subsequent to the award of this contract, the design engineer was authorized to prepare the plans and specifications for the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer. To avoid underground utility conflicts as wel l as traffic requirements during construction it is nec essary to realign the interconnections between the Knott Interceptor and the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer. This change order adjusts the engineer's quant i ties· by deleting 14 linea l feet of 42" RCP and the reduction of traffic island medians re- quested by the City of Buena Park . The staff recommends approval of this change order in a total reduction amount of $4,949 . No. 9-cc -Change Order No. 2 -Contract No . 3-lR-3. This contract for the plastic lining repair of manholes l ocated on the Miller-Ho l der Trunk Sewer requires that the contractor clean and replace all existing manhole frames and covers. During construction it was discovered that one particular area was subject to odor problems which were creating a local nui sance problem . To abate this situation the staff is recommending the replacement of the existing manhole with a pressure type of manhole to control the odors in this area for an additional cost of $544.50. No. 9-dd -Addendum No . 1 -Contract No. 3 -22 -1. This addendum revises the plans for this contract for which bids are scheduled to be r eceived on March 7th. It substitutes a 39" VCP stub for the originally planned 36" VCP stub at the junction structure at Western Avenue. This increased size is n ecessary to accommodate future extension of the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer. Districts 5 a nd 6 No. 9-gg -Initial Study for Second Barrel of Siphon at Santa Ana River Cro ssing . Pursuant to the Beard's authorization at the February -7- meeting , the staff ha s prepared an initial study to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the construction of a 33" siphon across the Santa Ana River bed northerly of Pacific Coast Highway. It is contemplated that the work wou ld be done in the fal l of this year to coincide with the Flood Control District's contract for the widening and improvements of the Santa Ana River. Pursuant to the Distric ts' Guidelines Imple- menting the California Environmental Quality Act, the staff is requesting authority to prepare a negative dec l aration for this proj ect and that said declaration be noticed as required . This action is necessary prior to submittal of an applicat ion for a Coastal Commission permit . District No. 7 No. 9 -ii -Initiation of Proceedings -Annexat ion No. 74. At the November, 1977 Board meet ing, the District received and fil ed a request for annexation of 2.27 acres in the unincor - porated territory of the County in the vicinity of the southerly corner of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive.· This matter was referred to the staff for study and recommendation . The staff has reviewed the application and feels that the proposed development conforms with the District's Master Plan of Development and recorrrrnends the adoption of Resolution No . 78 -45 -7 initiating the annexation proceedings. This parcel must be annexed to the 70th Sewer Ma intenance Discrict s i nce the was t ewater must be pumped to the District's gravity trunk sewers. No. 9 -j j -Initiat ion of Proceedings -Annexation No. 75 . At the December Board meet ing, the Directors received a request from a property owner to annex 4 .101 acres of territory in the City of Orange located in the vicinity of Arnapola Avenue and Ranchwood Trail. The staff has reviewed the proposed development and the app lican t has paid a ll process ing fees. The staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78 -46 -7 authorizing initiation of proceedings. No. 9-kk -Ordering Annexation No. 64. During the installation of a portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer fr om the intersection of Santiag o Boulevard and Spring Street to the intersection of Santi a g o Canyon Road and Linda Vista Street (Job No. 7-6-9) in the spring of 1976, the District acquir ed a sewer easement from the property owner own ing the par ce l of l and loc ated at the southeasterly corner of Hewes Street and Villa Park Road. As a condition of the granting of th e sewer easement, the property owner requested annexation to th e Sanita tio n District. The legal description and the necessary -8- document ation have been approved and LAFC has adopted a resolu- tion authorizing completion of annexation proceedings. The staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No . 78-47-7 ordering the annexation of 1 .859 acres of territory to the District. No. 9-11 -Ordering Annexation No. 67 . At the November, 1 977 Board meeting, the Directors initiated proceedings for the annexation of 3.397 acres located on Ladera Senda in the Co wan Heights area. This matter was subsequently forward ed to LAFC which has approved the parcel for annexation. The staff , therefore, recommends approval of Reso lu tion No. 78-48-7 ordering annexation of this parcel to the District. The parcel wil l be serve d by the 7th Sewer Maintenance District. No . 9-nn -Areawide Drainage Study MaE Tributary to Peters Canyon Area, and Estab l ishing an Area-wide Planning Charge fo r Certain Annexations to District No. 7. At the November Board meeting, the staff made a verbal report relative to future annexations to the District on those prop erties located on the backside of Cowan Heig hts, Lemon Hei ghts and Crawford Ca nyon areas. Th ese properties drain n atur al l y toward Peters Canyon and for years have been in the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) area of responsibility. However, no facilities have been constructed by IRWD to serve the area. For a considerable number of years, the District has been accepting small area annexations which entail construction of small pumping stations ·which have been incorporated in and made the responsibility of the 70th Sewer Maintenance District. It is becoming more difficult with increased building activity in this area to properly plan for the local sewer system and the effects on the District's trunk sewer system. Th e staff h as searched diligently throug hout the County for an existing topographic map to aid in a pla nning study for this area. There is no existing mapping known to the staff tha t co vers the subject drainage area; therefore, the staff is re - questing that an aerial topographic map be made by an outside firm for an amo un t not to exceed $10,000 to aid the s t aff in this planning study. It i s also recommended that since there is approximately 100 or 150 acres of territory which could be annexed to the District, that this aerial mapping charge be paid for by future petitioners for annexation . The staff is recommending that an additional $100 per acre be included in the proc ess ing fee to all app licants in thi s drainage area to offset the cosc for this study. -9- All Districts Nos. 11 and 12 -Executive Committee Report and Recomme ndations. The Committee met on February 22nd . A report of the mee ting and recomm e nded actions are included with the agenda ~aterial for all Board members. The actions appearing in Agenda Item No . 12 are recomm e nded for approva l. No. 13 -Financi al Report for Period Ended De cember 31, 1977. Enclosed with the agenda materia l is a financial report from the Director of Finance for the 6-month period ended December 31, 1977. If any Director has any questions or wishes additional information, please call Wayne Sylvester or Fred Harper , telephone 540-2910. District No. 3 No. 19 -Award of Contract No. 3-21 -1 -Ora n ge thorpe Relief Sewer. At the February meet ing , the Directors approved plans and specifications for this portion of the Orangetho rp e Re lief Sewer extending from ~he Knott Interceptor S ewer to Western Avenue in the City of Buena Park. Bids are schedul ed to be received on Tuesday, March 7th a nd the results wil l be reported to the Board on the supplemental agenda. The staff expects very com- petitive bids on this project inasmuch as more than fifte e n prospective bidders have picked up plans and specifications and bidding documents . Engineer's estimate for this project is $702,150 . -1 0- Fred A. Harper Gener a l Manager i' -. ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California February 28, 1978 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. IOX 1127 IOIU ELLIS AVlNUI FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA fJ70I 171•> 540.2910 111 •I '62·2• II Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Honths Ended December 31, 1977 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly sumnary financial report for the six months ended De~ember 31, 1977, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. The statements sumnarize the fiscal activiti~s of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first half of the 1977-78 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1977-78 budgets for all Districts is $120.2 million, of which approximately 85% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The average budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts compared with last year are as follCMs: (In Millions of Dollars) Increase REVENUE 1976-77 % of Bud9et 1977-78 (Decrease) % of Bud9et Carry-Over & Construction Reserves $ 52.1 53.0% $ 73.4 $ 21.3 61.1% Tax Revenue 20.8 21.1 21.4 .6 17.8 Federal & State Construction Grants 10.2 10.3 13.2 3.0 11.0 ·Fees 2.1 2.2 3.9 1.8 3.2 Sale of Capacity Rights 7.2 7.3 .1 . (6.S) .6 Interest & Other Income s.8 6.1 7.6 1.8 6.3 Total Funds Available $ 98.2 100.0% $ 120.2 $ 22.0 100.0t EXPENDITURES District Construction Programs $ 48.S 49.3% $ 41;2 $ (7.3) 34.]% Joint Works Construction Programs 34.4 35.0 60.8 26.4 so.6 Debt Retirement & Interest 3.7 3.8 3.6 (.1) 3.0 Joint Operating Expense s.o s.1 6.8 1.8 S.7 District Maintenance, Operating & Other Expenditures 6.6 6.8 7.8 '.2 6.lt Total Expenditures $ 98.2 100.0t $ 120.2 $ 22.0 100.oi .. Included in.each.District's statement ts a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of thctr trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Convnents are included on anticipated budget transfers which are traditionally considered with the third quarter report, following specific reconrncndations. Except for invento;y control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. As part of the Revenue Program Phase I study·, Peat, Harwick, Mitchell S Co., Districts' auditor and Revenue Program consultant, is reviewing EDP requirements to assure maximum utilization consistent with cost effectiveness. A separate report and reconrnendation is due shortly. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1977-78 which were accrued in 1976-77 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the report, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $2.3 million. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits, and presently a substantial amount is with the County Treasurers Commingled investments to take advantage of the currently higher yield. JCINT OPERATING FUND .U This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts• jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries and Wages -Because of presently authorized but unfilled positions, it is anticipated that recently approved salary and benefit increases will be funded from current year payroll savings. Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement (see additional convnents re Retirement under Prior Year's Expense below, Workmen's Compensation (see comments below under insurance), Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms. To date, the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers has been unsuccessful in their challenge of the unemployment insurance mandate for p~blic agencies. Therefor, such coverage became effective January 1, 1978. Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -Expenses are rising sharply since placing new activated sludge treatment \.._) facilities at Plant No. 1 into service. The two 1500 horse power engines can use up to 900 gallons a day of diesel fuel depending on the availability of digester gas. It therefor appears as if a budget transfer will be necessary for this account before the end of the year. Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter. Significant premium increases experienced by our Districts and throughout the governmental sector continue to occur. The Fiscal Policy Committee is studying the feasibility of self insurance of liability and workers• compensation and will submit its report to the Executive Committee in the near future. Office Expense -Expected to increase throughout the fiscal year as new mandated programs are implemented. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. A new chlorine contract was awarded in December at a unit price decrease of $2.60 per ton. Budget appropriation should be adequate. Chemical Coaqulants -Expenditures for this item are increasing to maintain compliance with NPPES permit requirements, yet are presently well within the ~udget allocation. Other Operating Supplies -Hiscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, lab supplies, tools, etc. Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge and grit hauling and EDP services. Sludge hauling costs will increase as a result of price escalation and increased volume from new activated sludge facilities which may require a budget transfer. Professional Services -Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Budget includes Revenue Program Implementation (Phase I I) which will take place during the last half of the fiscal year as required by SWRCB and EPA. (Also see corrments under Federal and State Constructipn Grants Item.) Printing. and Publications -Continuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with "paper work" required by other agencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. Rents and Leases -Egulpment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations. -2-..•. -. -. Repa.lrs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of. plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally this account runs very tight due to the unpredJct• abt 1 lty of major equipment failures. .Budget is presently "on-the-money.11 Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first half of 1977-78. Budget also includes funds for operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters. Travel, Meeting & Training -This item has increased for required travel of directors and staff re efforts to amend PL 92-500. Utilities -The major Item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has increased substantially in the past few years due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is from rising· demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. As the activated sludge facilities are phased into service at Plant No. 1 this item will increase dramatically. This was anticipated at budget time, however, it appears as if costs may exceed the appro· priation, necessitating a transfer of funds. Other Expenses -For Items not chargeable ~lsewhere. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. Pursuant to approval by the Boards in 1976 the Districts transferred from Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS). The change result· ed in a 25% reduction in the Districts current costs. However, in accordance with the terms of the transfer the Districts were to assume any accumulated liability under OCERS in excess of funds transferred from PERS. The liability was unknown when budgets were adopted and were therefor excluded with a provision that any liability could be funded from Unappropriated Reserve. The adjusted amount has now been detennlned to be $220,852. In addition, corrected prior year billings from Edison Company for plant power and State Compensation rate corrections have been charged to this account in the total amount of $81,532. Therefor, a budget transfer to this account will be necessary to cover the one-time assessment. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts• jointly-ONned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 51% (including reserves) of each individual Districts' budget require· ments for 1977-78. During the first six months, 5.1 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion, primarily on the 75 HGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant-No. 2, up to 87.5% of which will be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financlal statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and Include each respective Districts' share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. ~ -Approximately 47% of the 1977-78 property taxes have been apportioned through December 31st. Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant Funds received during the period amount to $2.3 million, mostly on joint works {CORF) projects. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87.5% of "approved" treatment projects. HONever, these agencies have advised that payments will be limited to 80% of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The Boards are aware that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, vigorously supported legislation to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem taxes which would result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts' taxpayers. In December, the law was amended to allow ad valorem taxes for use charges on residential and some conrnercial establishments. While this provision will partially relieve the burden of levying use charges and billing users of Districts' services, implementation of the Revenue Program by July, 1978 will be a monumental task, at best. Phase 1 (Revenue Program Document) of the program which was commissioned by the Boards last year is near completion, however, it must now be modified to incorporate the ad valorem provisions as allowed by the recent amendments. Phase II (detailed design and implementation) was recently approved by the Boards. However, upon recommendation of the State Water Resources Control Board, we are presently delaying the completion of Phase I and conrnencement of full work on Phase II to avoid duplication of effort pending issuance of· new user charge regulations by EPA due in early March. When received, the stops will be pulled out and we will be able to proceed with completion of the program. Staff is keeping the Executive Committee apprised of this work. · Fees -With the exception of Districts 1 and 6, all Districts now have a sewer connection fee schedule In affect. This account also includes industrial waste use charges levied by all seven Districts pursuant to the Uniform lndustriaJ Waste Ordinance. Collections to date are generally running behind budget, however, this is partially due to lag time in use charge billing computations and delays in remittance of connection fees collected by cities on behalf of the respective Districts. District No. 11 has not yet received a transmittal of funds collected by the city since the ordinance went into effect on September 9, 1977. Other Revenue -Except as footnoted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. Budget amounts are adjusted for certain accruals as noted above. -3- District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1977-78 budget (including reserves) for this item is 3~% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2, 3 and 11. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts during the first six months was $536,000. ~ Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.2 million. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts• share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of individual Districts• general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. District No. 5 may require a budget transfer in it's operating fund as a result of expenditures necessary to repair the recent force main break in Pacific Coast Highway. Last ye~r the County Treasurer implemented a banking fee to cover their cost of handling commingled investments which have been accounted for in each Districts' operating fund. They can now provide us with the information to allocate the convningled interest earnings and banking fee to the appropriate fund rather than accounting for all activity within the operating fund. It will, therefor, be necessary to reallocate a portion of the banking fee budget from the operating fund to the respective bond and capital funds to reflect this change in procedure. JWS:dt J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance and Board Secretary .... '--" \.,.) '..._,,; ., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW . SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1977 BUDGET " 1977-78 YEAR TO DATE SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS Salaries & Wages 4,033,805 1,684,834 Employee Benefits 704, 079 2231626 Sub-total Payroll 4,737,884 l,908,460 Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF· 1,000,000 5121089 Net Joint Operating Payroll 3,737,884 l 13961371 MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel 70,000 21,975 Insurance 145,000 102,709 Office Expense 45,000 10,998 Operating Expense Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals 300,000 125,916 Chemical Coagulants 420,000 151,973 Other Operating Supplies 147,000 46,190 Contractual Services 390,000 145, 778 Professional Services 367,000 30,464 Printing & Publications 41,000 11, 226 Rents & Leases--Equipment 22,000 5,432 Repairs & Maintenance 413,000 187,518 Research & Monitoring 288,000 67,512 Travel, Meeting & Training 25,000 9,340 Utilities 883,000 355,465 Other Expenses 25,000 13,534 Prior Years Expense 20,000 302,934' Total Material & Supplies 3,601,000 1,588,964 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE 7,~38,884 2,983,335 Less: Revenues 521,000 106,411 NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE 6,817,884 2,878,924 GALLONAGE INFORMATION REMAINING BUDGET 2, 348, 971 4802453 2,829,424 487; 911 2,341,513 48,025 42,291 34,002 174,084 268,027 100,810 244,222 336,536 29,774 16,568 225,482 220,488 15,660 527,535 11,466 (282,934) 2,012,036 4,353,549 41~,589 3,938,960 FLOW IN MILLION GAL GALLONAGE CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE 1 7,878 3,615 789,511 315,460 2 21,184 10,631 2,123,089 927,502 3 21,868 10,614 2,192,631 926,003 5 3,962 1,813 396,801 158,207 6 4,185 1, 974 419,300 172,186 7 4,437 2,193 444,526 191,340 11 4,510 2,157 452,026 188,226 TOTAL 68,024 32,997 6,817,884 2,878,924 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. l SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ·SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1977 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Endi~g Fund Balances, December 31 1977-78 Budget 1,399,948 1,234,000 234,000 426,600 . 4,900,000 2,566,564 90,738 789,511 80,.650 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Raitt St. Trunk Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stns. Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-77 1,331,350 3,689,261 5, 020, 611 21,657 4,241,810 11, 593 13,709 5,593,818 4,292 14,907,490 Additions 61,667 464,920 526,587 526,587 Year to Date 5,481,908 731,850 180,855 55,922 168,380 6,618,915 61,667 464,920 71, 794 315,460 20,053 933,894 5,685,021 Transfer to Fixed Assets -_,, Remaining Budget 668,098 1,053,145 178,078 258,220 4,838,333 2,101,644 18,944 474,051 60,597 Balance 12-31-77 I, 393,017 4,154,181 5,547,198 21,657 4,241,810 11,593 13,709 5,593,818 4.292 15 1 434 1 077 \._,) ·COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 · SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT SJ X MONTHS HIDED DECEMBER 31J 1977 Beginning FWld Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Taxes BUDGET REVIEW 1977-78 Budget Federal and State Construction Grants Fees 5,853,996 4,356,000 1,580,000 1,372,400 Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Con·struction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures 24,664,993 8,424,534 524,956 2,123,089 412,500 Total Expenditures EP~ing Fund Balances, December 31 \..,) CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Yorba Linda Pump Station Yorba Linda Force Main Yorba Linda Pump Station Manhole Anaheim Forebay Reclamation Plant Sleepy Hollow/Carbon Canyon Richfield and Orchard Sub Trunks Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stns. Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative t:acil i ties '-'rlli ty in Joint Treatment Facilities Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equipment FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance 6-30-77 Additions 11,213,600 . 182,432. 798,675 23 732,413 7. 22,306 1,940 36, 113 23,346 21,030 -0-21,587 12,826;453 227,019 12, 102, 723 1,525,183 24,929,176 1,752,202 374,084 28,364,889 1,186 33 ,172 33,582 18,350,674 14,197 72, 100, 960 1,752,202 Year to Date 22,929,112 3,017,643 593,300 556,485 954,357 28,050,897 227,019 1,525,183 46,059 927,502 117, 033 2,842,796 25,208,101 Transfer to Fixed Assets Remaining Budget 2,836,353 3,762,700 1,023,515 418,043 24,437,974 6,899,351 478,897 1,195,587 295,467 Balance 12-31-77 11, 396, 032 798,698 732,420 24,246 36, 113 44,376 21,587 13,053,472 13,627,906 26,681,378 374,084 28,364,889 1,186 33, 172 33,582 18,350,674 14,197 73,853,162 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 3J, 1977 BUDGET REVIE\\' Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPE:f'.llHTURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 1977-78 Budget 8,050,515 4,775,000 1,243,000 1,132,225 21,220,559 9,335,524 735,907 2,192,631 562,000 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Knott Interceptor, a portion of Reach 7 Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Knott Interceptor, Reaches 7 & 8 Westside Relief Interceptor Westminster Ave. Force Main Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stns.· · Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-77 3,922,654 -0- 99, 293 1,359,068 52,615 5,433,630 13,421,766 18,855,396 266,131 35,895,855 15,036 28,419 52,006 20,350,664 15,752 75,479,259 Additions 228,591 551 ·1,464 4,831 350 235,787 1,691,408 1,927,195 1,927,195 Year to Date 21,034,669 4,131,856 984,744 737,652 696,977 27,585,898 235,787 1,691,408 35,968 926,003 153,680 3,042,846 24,543,052 Transfer to Fixed Assets ._ --.,._. Remaining Budget 3,918,659 3,790,256 505,348 435,248 20,984,772 7, 644' 116 699,939 1,266,628 408,320 Balance 12-21-77 4,151,245 551 100,757 1,363,899 52,965 5,669,417 15,113,174 20,782,591 266,131 35,895,855 15,036 28,419 52,006 20,350,664 15,752 77,406,454 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT SIX MONTHS ENDF.D DF.CEf1BER 31.-1977 BUDGET REVIEW 1977-78 Budget Year to Date Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Truces Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures 1,518,664 914,000 142,000 1,386,100* . 6,355,945 1,900,950 27,865 396,801 366,200 5,335,033 778,880 136,089 43,840 175,031 6,468,873 10,361 349,840 20,678 158,207 72!122 Total Expenditures 611,208 P~ding Fund Balances, December 31 5,857,665 ~ncludes $1,150,000 loan from Irvine Co. for Back Bay Drive Sewer (or alternate) and Bayside Drive sewer extension, if needed. CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications Back Bay Drive Trunk NIWA Planning Other Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pwnp Stns. Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities · ~Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equipment FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance 6-30-77 18,857 268,059 7,130 5,180 299,_226 2,776,078 3,075,304 6,231 3,117,223 7,347 7,116 8,946 4,209,209 3,270 10,434,646 Additions 543· 7,077 5,436 (2,695)** 10,361 349,840 360,201 360,201 **Litigation Cost Reimbursement, Cont 5-19 Transfer to Fixed Assets Remaining Budget 739,784 777' 911 98,160 1, 211, 069 6,345,584 1,551,110 7,187 238,594 294,078 Balance 12-31-77 19,400 275,136 12,566 2,485 309.,587 3,125,918 3,435,505 6,231 3,117,223 7,347 7,116 8,946 4,209,209 3,270 10,794,847 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT SIX MONTHS ErJDFD DECEMBER 31.-1977 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 1977-78 Budget '890, 092 792,000 10,000 183,200 2,467,000 1,647,114 33,922 419,300 86,000 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications New Metering Structure Other Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stns. Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities Balance 6-30-77 502 861 7,512 8,875 2,370,219 2, 3i9, 094 562 625,628 2,653 7,394 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 16,237 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 3,593,828 Other assets at cos·t less amortization 6,983 Total Property Plant & 6,632,379 Equipment *Litigation Cost Reimbursement, Cont 5-19 Additions (160) * (160) 298,695 298,535 298,535 Year to Date 3,029,783 452,068 116, 193 16,652 97,562 3, 712,258 (160) * 298,695 25,777 172, 186 8,762 505,260 3,206,998 Transfer to Fixed Assets Remaining Budget 438,024 675,807 (6,652) 85,638 2,467,160 1,348,419 8,145 247 ,114 77,238 Balance 12-31-77 502 861 7,352 8, 715 2,668,914 2,677,629 562 625,628 2,653 7,394 16,237 3,593,828 6,983 ~930,914 '-1) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31J 1977 Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures 1977-78 Budget 2,267,815 1,147,000 384,000 2,182,162* 7,992,327 2,386,058 677 ,447 444,526 370,250 iing Fund Balances December 31 ~ncludes transfer of prior year's connection fees from cities pursuant to new agreements FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance 6-30-77 Additions CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Tustin-Orange Trunks 3,516 MacArthur Pump Station Bubbler System 1,146 423 Increase Pumping Capability -0-280 Other 2,395 7,057 703 Share of Joint Works 3,429 J 511 432,186 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & 3,436,568 432,889 EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 275,740 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 17,965,729 Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities 10,782 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 12,440 Equity in Joint Treatment \..,'Facilities 5,199,973 Other assets at cost less amortization 4,263 Total Property Plant & 26,905,495 432,889 Equipment Year to Date 6,685,741 1,181,538 168,122 297,601 1,582,239 9,915,241 703 432,186 272, 753 191,340 100,627 997,609 8,917,Q32 Transfer to Fixed Assets Remaining Budget 1,086,277 978,878 86,399 599,923 7,991,624 1,953,872 404 J 694 253,186 269,623 Balance 12-31-77 3,516 1,569 280 2,395 7,760 3,861,697 3,869,457 275,740 17,965,729 10,782 12,440 5,199,973 4,263 27 2 338 1 384 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31~ 1977 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, December 31 1977-78 Budget 1,749,789 934,000 240, 000 389,100 6,566,000 1,943,256 90,226 452,026 211, 250 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Master Plan Coast Hwy. Trunk Slater Ave. Pump Station Share of Joint Works COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stns. Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities - Other assets at cost less amortization Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-77 20,879 8,038 1,226 30, 143 2,796,371 2,826,514 18, 711 3,872,692 3,053 24,435 4,239,978 3,250 10,988,633 Additions 937 142 1,079 352,398 353,477 353,477 Year to Date 6,493,303 923,480 137,084 5,180 204,748 7,763,795 1,079 352,398 12,333 188,226 70,751 624,787 7, 139, 008 Transfer to Fixed Assets \..-)- Remaining Budget 826,309 796,916 234,820 184,352 6,564,921 1,590,858 77,893 263,800 140,499 Balance 12-31-77 21,816 8,180 1,226 31,222 3,148,769 3,179,991 18, 711 3,872,692 3,053 24,435 4,239,978 ~ 3,250 11, 342' 110 March 1, 1978 STAFF REPORT RE: Impact of Jarvis-Gann Initiative COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 The Jarvis-Gann tax limitation initiative which has been placed on the ballot for the June 6th election will, if passed: -Limit ad valorem property taxes to one percent (1%) of the full cash value of the property. -Require counties to levy the one-percent (1%) tax and "ap- portion it according to law to the districts (taxing agencies) within the counties." -Establish as a basis for "full cash value" the county assessor's appraised value as of March 1, 1975. (property subsequently sold or improved would be reappraised). -Limit increases in fair market value to two percent (2%) per annum. -Become effective July 1, 1978 (twenty-three days after adoption) The impact of the initiative on the Sanitation Districts can be summarized into three basic issues: 1. Will it be necessary for the Districts to compile dual budgets for 1978-79? 2. What is the short-term financing alternative? 3. What is the long-term financing alternative? Following is a general discussion of each issue. 1. 1978-79 Dual Budgeting: Under present procedures, the official budgets of the respective Districts will not be acted upon by the Boards until the regular joint meeting on August 9th. Although consideration of the joint works budgets for maintenance and operation (JO) and con- struction (CORF) of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities "-"'' usually takes place at the regular June·rneeting (June 14th, thi~ year), said budgets do ·not, as such, levy· a tax. Rather, following approval by the Joint Boards, they are incorporated into and become a line item of the official budget of each District to be considered in August. There should, therefore, be sufficient time to consider any revisions deemed necessary to the JO and CORF budgets and to prepare and review the individual District budgets after the outcome of the election is known. 2. Short-Term Financing Alternative: The attached schedules present a preliminary estimate of the anticipated loss of tax revenue in the event the initiative passes. Although there are several un-/ knowns with respect to the allocation of revenues collected under Jarvis-Gann to the various taxing agencies, the estimates are considered fairly representative. The Districts could lose between $12 and $13 million in tax revenue in 1978-79. This represents a 58% overall reduction, ranging from 43% in District No. 7 to 66% in District No. 11. It will, in all liklihood, require that the Districts develop alter- native funding sources. Pursuant to the Boards' pay-as-you-go policy, each District has been accumulating capital funds to finance the local (District) share of advanced treatment facilities required by the 1972 Federal Water Pol- lution Control Act and their respective master planned trunk sewers. However, Directors are aware that the recent amendments to the Act include provisions wherein the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may grant a waiver to the secondary treatment requirements of the 1972 version of the Act, provided certain conditions are met. We feel that our Districts will qualify for the waiver which would then allow release of a portion of the accumulated capital re- serve funds for reallocation in 1978-79 to temporarily provide operating and debt retirement funding until a permanent long-range funding alter- native could be developed and implemented. 3. Long-Term Financing Alternative: As part of the 1972 Water Pollution Control Act the Districts were required to develop a revenue program incorporating a user charge system. Such a system would place a tremendous administrative burden on large sewerage agencies and add substantially to the cost of operation. Because a user charge/billing system is not as cost-effective as financing based on an ad valorem tax system, our Districts, along with large metropolitan sewerage agencies around the country convinced Congress to change the law and allow ad valorem taxes to satisfy the use charge requirement. The staff is now ·;proceeding to finalize our revenue program utilizing ad valorem taxes. : ~ •.. 1~·· However, while the amendments allowing ad valorem taxes were pending before Congress, the Districts were required to do a considerable amount of preliminary work on a user charge/billing system. Therefore, the groundwork for developing an alternative system has been laid anq, in the event the initiative passes and it becomes necessary to implement a separate user charge/billing system to fund Districts' activities, much of the initial work has already been completed. With an intensive (and expensive) effort, implementation of an alternative billing method could be commenced within one to two years to replace the ad valorem tax system. An analysis of the initiative by the Districts' General Counsel is included with this report. -2- \.,,I COU~TY"SANITATION DISTRICTS ALL DISTRICTS AVERAGED ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $21,256,752,584. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 212,567,526. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0329 District Share of Taxes $ 7,013,438. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 2,019,216. Total District Share of Taxes $ . 9 ' 0 32 ' 6 54 • 1977-78 District Tax Levy 21,428,669. Potential Loss to Districts (58%) $· ·12' 396' 015 •. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 . ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,440,972,476. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 14,409,725. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0351 District Share of Taxes $ 505, 781. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85,775. ~ Total District Share of Taxes $ 591,556. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,382,548. Potential Loss to District (57%) $ 790,992. 1-..' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $6,018,442,828. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 60,184,428. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0317 District Share of Taxes $ 1,907,846. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 480, 116. Total District Share of Taxes $ 2,387,962. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 5,729,496. Potential Loss to District (58%) $ 3,341,534. -. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 . ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $7,132,225,368. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 71,322,254. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0354 District Share of Taxes $ 2,524,808. Add:· Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 678,615. ·~ $ 3,203,423. Total District Share of Taxes 1977-78 District Tax Levy 7,970,515. Potential Loss to District (60%) $ 4,767,092. ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,700,468,484. Maximum Percentage Allowed . 01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 17,004,685. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0341 District Share of Taxes $ 579,860. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 26 2 532. Total District Share of Taxes $ 606,392. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,497,464. Potential Loss to District (60%) $ 891,072. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property Maximum Percentage Allowed Maximum Taxable Property Value Districts Share of Tax Rate District Share of Taxes Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy Total District Share of Taxes 1~77-78 District Tax Levy Potential Loss to District. (59%) $1,214,426,020. .01 $ 12,144,260. .0272 $ 330,324. $ $ 31,923. 362,247. 879,992. 517,745. \,,,,,' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $2,250,102,072. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 22' 501 '021 • Districts Share of Tax Rate .0291 District Share of Taxes $ 654,780. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 631,134. Total District Share of Taxes $ 1,285,914. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 2,238,815. Potential Loss to District (43%) $ 952, 901. \..,' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 ESTIMATED IMPACT OF JARVIS-GANN INITIATIVE Cash Value of Property $1,500,115,336. Maximum Percentage Allowed .01 Maximum Taxable Property Value $ 15,001,153. Districts Share of Tax Rate .0340 District Share of Taxes $ 510,039. Add: Bond Debt Funds Total Levy 85, 121. Total District Share of Taxes $ 595,160. 1977-78 District Tax Levy 1,729,839. Potential Loss to District {66%) $ 1,134,679. t Excc1ptcd from C.il T.1x New~ Cal-Tax analysis of the· Jarvis initiative: 11 key questions for California taxpayers With the appa1ent qualification of the Jarvis/Gann property tax initiariw trn rht! June 1978 statewiclt~ ballot. C.1111111111<1 voters will lie givl'll their tow 1h l'h.111c1! in 10 years to constitutton<1lly limit p1op· erty taxes. The initiative. which garnered a reported 1 million signatun•s hy the December 2 dt~adline, proposes to: •Limit ad valorem property tilXPS to one percent ( 1",,I of tht! full c<.ish value of the property. •Require counties to levy the one-per· cent ( 1%) ta.< and "apportion •t accordinq to law to the district:. within 1he counties.· •Establish as a basis for "full cash •JJlue" the county assessor's appraisec1 value as of March 1. 1975 (prope1 ty suhs1!quently sold or improved would be reappraised). •Limit increases in fair market value to two percent (2'!:.) per annum. •Require an affirmative vote of two· thirds (2/3) of the "qualifiec.J electors" of any respective taxing en~ity to raist? city, county or special district taxes. Basic questions posed by the Jarvis/ Gann initiative are examined by Cal·Tax in the following analysis: •What would the replacement revenues be? According to the Legislativu Analyst, Jarvis/Gann would cut lor.al rlroperty tax revenues by $7 hillion to SB hil!ion. 111 addition, there would he a rnlatcd un· known loss oi fedmal revenue·sh;trirlg funds. Since the proposal is silenr Orl re· lllacemcnt revenues. po~s1hle sou:ces from which the difference could he made up is a question open to speculation. However, the magnitude of replace ment revenues can be estimated in te1 ms of increases which WOL!ld Im nrecled in any one of tlrn other rhrer. major Cali fornia tax somces. For example. a rlm1· bling of the Silles tax rcJte 10 12 25";. would raise an estimated $7.5 hill1on. A 150% surcharqe on the 1>rnst!n r income tax could raise thf? neecled rP.nlacr.m1mt revenue; or, the present SO\. hu~11wss inventory tax exemption could he elum· nated and the hank and corpora1mn rax rate could bt? incrt!.1~ed f1om 9"., to 44", .• two moves which. toqether, c:ould r~11se $7.5 billion. It also would <ippem that rhc 1 " .. I um t on full cash value is 1 eally les~ th,111 one percent. requirinn .•~ven mo11• u•plac:11 ment revemws. Sinc:1! rhc fi1 ~! yPar vahw of p1ope1ty 1s as ol M.11d1 1. l!J75, 1h11 redl limit would h1! about 7· 10rh» of I'';, on the effoc:t1v1• clc1tt! of ttw anwr11l11w11t (July I, 19781. In tlw fu11111!. rh•! l:nut would becomP ev1•n l•'lhtcr. h1!c,111o;I' rhe prc1po-;,1I strpul.111•c. th.if vah11!» c:wrhl not im:rn,1se hy 111011! than 2"·· Pt!• ye,11 (exccpr fo1 newly p1111:h.1<.cll or n1iwly .1·onsr1ucwd p101wr tyl D~prnding upon .11·tu.1I llldl ket VilllW 111 owth, it IS COllCl'IV· .1hl1• 1h.1t the 1?ffcctiVl' lirnir in 10 Yt!ars could he as low .is I '3rd of 1'"., of m;uket v.11111°'>. rf ~ud1 vJIUf'S were to lw dcr 1vcd. as rhey Jre now, hom tht! mar kctpl<tce. Since th1~ proposal defines full c;1sh v,11111• \IS tht! "county ,rSSt!SSOr \valuation" illltl does not mention state ;issl!ssecs, it le..iv1!S unanswered the qUt!Stron as 10 wlwth1!1 stat!! assessces fall within the 1'\, limit. If statu assesst!es aw outside the limn. a major increase 111 tax liability could fall on these t<1xpay1!r s. whose p1 operty held a 1976· 7 7 cJSSessed value of S5.6 billion. or about 6% of the total st.l:e·local assessment roll. •Which taxpayers will benefit? P1evious tax limit initiatives have been viewed as faulty mechanisms for distri· hution of tax savings. Assuming that the major purpose of such limitations is home· owner property tax relief. it shoult.l be noted that an across·the·board limit provides most of its benefirs to owners of business or income· producing property. This efft!ct was not fully understood until the first Watson initiative campaign in 1968, where it was determined that since 65°;, of the property tax was paid by husiness. an across the·l>oarcf approach also gave 65''., of the relief to busine~s. Since the Jarvis/Gann proposal, unlike tlw homeowners' exemption. 1s an untar· getecJ approach, nearly SS billion in $7.5 bill ion first.year property tdx savings would go to non·homeowncrs. Of coursP., rhc business tax "wimlfall", if any, could nor Im dt•ter mmecl until afrer replacement 1t!Vt!11ues we1 e selected. Another feature of Jarvis "Gann which ".l'em!> tu unintent1on<.1lly discriminate agalllst homeowners as the provision requirin~1 the reapprarsal of property dt the time of sale. Some major industrial planrs may never he sole!. rhus canyrng 1hei1 1975 assessments (plus 21\1 increase pm yea1) indefinitely. Since a si11gle- f<1m1ly horne is sold, on the average, once 1•ve1 y seven years. property sales would more heavily affect residential valuation. There is also the question of e<1ual tax rrnatment of similady <;ituarecf home· owne1s. Homeowners 111 11lent1cal ma1 ket v.ilue houses. next door to one another. r.ould 1>.tY suhstantrally cfrfforent prop- erty t<.rXP.'i for the same ~1overnment ser· viceo; simply heca11S1! one house harl not het>ll 1.ol<I and the otlwr had. Fm exJmple, assume two IH!l<Jhhorin~1 $40.000 m,11 k1?t valw! homes, aml project a 2'·., r.umpournled annual inc:n:ase. In five yt!,lf"S, eaa:h house would h;1ve a conslitu· 11011ally tlt!f11wcl market value of 544, 161. Ar tlw hPq11m111q of the !>1xth year. one l1011~e ~uld fur SG4.000. wh1c:h is a 1 ather mt11lt1q. 1"" P•!r month wllecf1011 of vJl11.1tum illl:ll!,J'it~s 111 tlw Cati for nia hot:".rnq 1n;11 kl't. It io;, nt!v1•1 tl11•1t·s~. a 6Qc;:, g111w11l 111 v.1l11.rt11J11 ove1 1tw frvt!·year p1!11!!1!. Srnt:t• 11 1~ 11111 c1•11.1111 how the limit works with resprc:t to the home· owner t>xemprion. simply as!>ume that the full rn:ukP.t value 1~ raxahle at 1':',,. This would mt•an that onP homeowner would pay a property tax 1>111 of 5441.61 and the owner of the newly r epurc:hasl!tl ;rnd revalued house would pay a property tax lull of 5640.00, 45'\, higher than the identical house next door. Estimation of total homeowner hene· fits under Jarvis/Gann is impossible. because proper ry rax savings have to he netted against h1<1her federal and state income taxes (due to lo~s of property tax cJeductions1. and replacement revenues calling for higher income and sales tax rates would be subject to later legislation. As for renters. while residential rentals are within the limit, the savings would go to landlords. and any pass·on of property rax savrngs to renters would have to he a subject for a suhseQuent st<Jtute. Of course, renters could also pay higher income ancJ sales taxes to replace lost property tax revenues. o What local public service cuts will be made? As with past in1t1atrve proposals. the Jarvis/Gann amendment offers more than replacement revenue prol>lems; much of the shortfall would have to be made up in cuts in present levels of public service. Given the cost impact of the propo~ed limit, cuts would undoubtedly have to be made into l>asic local services. How and where would such decisions be made? What would he cut:> The proposal also raises a number of other questions regarding the definition and intent of VJrious of its provisions. A few of those questions: •How wm the limited property tax revenues be distributed? Section 1 (a) of the amendment reqwres that the l'~b tax will be" ... -col· lected hy the counties and apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties." What will he the basis for the counties' distribution of the sharply limited property tax revenue~? Does distribution to the "districts" mean that cities and counties are excluded from any property tax revenues? •Would the amendment effectively prohibit any future general obliga- tion bond issues? Major problems seem to confront any future qeneral obliqario11 bond financing. A two· thirds vote of the qualified electors is required to impose special taxes within a district, but. apparently, no new ad valorem t<1xcs can he rJised, even if approved by a two·thircls vote of the people. If general ohlrqation honds are in some w<iy still allowed under the amend· ment, the two·third!: requirement would seem to be an impossible hur<lle. If. for example. 65":, of all registered · voters turned out. all voting "•-1es" on a bond issue. it could still go down to clt!feat for failing to mt!et tlw u~quirmnmlt that two-thirds of all reg1swred voters approve it. Further. since th1! proposal excludt?S from the limit prior votell·app1oved general obligation bond levies, it may be assumed that future voter-approved levies would he within the limit. •Would the amendment substan· tially increase personal property taxes? The ammulm1mt only JJ>plies to re;1/ property. Does this nwan that p1!r~o11.1I pro~>erty, prnsently vJlut>d Jt S 14 hillinn statewide, woulcl hi! s11h1ect to mc11!i1St!S to partly recover lost real property tax revenues due to the limit' Would the 50° .. invt•ntory tdx t>xernption also be eliminated? •Would the amendment provide a tax loophole for "new construe· tion?" Section 2 provides for reassessments of "newly constructed" property, a term which is not defined. Would a multi· million-dollar aduition to an existing plant be "new construction" or an addition? If only an addition, it could present a loophole whereby billions in new construction could escape taxation entirely. •Will the timber tax be felled by the amendment? Jarvis/Gann would require the use of 1975·76 values. The value of timherlands -real property -(located in about 25 California countiesl was included in the value of standing timber in 1975-76: As a result of a recent change in statute and the constitution, timber w3s removed from the property tax and is now subject to a yield tax at the time of harvest. Under Jarvis/Gann, timber owners would pay future property taxes on the basis of 1975-76 values. which included timber v.1lues. S111ce tht! yi1ihl tax is not repealed, the tirnher owners face the prospect of douhle tJxation. •Could Jarvis/Gann cause over- assessments of properties? In going to 1975·76 assessments, the unclerlymg assumption is that they will lm lowur. and generally this is true. Howevt!r, there are many properties that h.we dt!cline<I in value since 1975· 76, frn cl varwty of reasons, and the only way these asse!tsments could he rcd•1ced in the future would he through a decline of the consumer p1 ice index helow an annual mere.1st! ot 2"11 · a very unlikely event. •Does the 1% limit apply to the total value of a home or to the value that remains after the home- owners' exemption? Determination of this question could make a significant difference in tax bur· den, particularly for a modest home. For example, on a Sl 5,000 home, a 1% prop· erty tax would yield a maximum of $150.00. If, however, the tax were based only on the SS,000 remaining after the 57,000 homP.owners' exemption is applied, the maximum tax would be $80.00. If the limit applies to the total value rather than the residual value after the homeowners exemption, Jarvis/Gann could make little difference in the prop· erty tax burdens of low·valued homes and could significantly increase other taxes needed for replacement revenues. Assume the same $15,000 market value home in an $11.50 tax rate area. The tax on this home, after the exemp· tion, at present would be $230. $80 higher than the 1%·of-market·value approach. Would $80 savings cover the increased sales, income, and user taxes and fees that would be needed to replace lost revenues? Would it also cover in· creased insurance costs due to cutbacks in Text of Jarvis/Gann That Article XIII A is added to the Constitution to read: Section 1. police. fire, and other home-protection services? Of course, if the home had a still-lower value, there could l>e no savings under Jarvis/Gann and there could be an actual property tdX increa~e. in addition to ott'ier non-property tax increases. els a limit of 1% of market value realistic and equitable in its appli- cation to the variety of fiscal con· ditions that prevail in California taxing jurisdictions? In Los Angeles County, for example, the spread between the highest ;md the lowest composite tax rate is $13.93, from S21.62 to $7 .69, for a difference of from 5.4°;, to 1.9~ii of market value, assuming a uniform 25% assessment ratio. Tax rates a1e high in some districts for a number of reasons, including poor planning, bad public-spending habits, the desire of the local taxpayers to assume short· and long-term spending obli· gations, low assessed valuation, inade· quate water supply, high fire danger, overlapping special districts, high cost public utility services and facilities, etc. In short, there arc myriad reasons for high tax rates. Should it be assumed that the people who continue to live in these high tax areas no longer wish to pay these rates and either want service cuts, other taxes. or help from other taxpayers? Is ;t realistic to assume that a $21.62 rate can be cut to $4.00 (equivalent to 1% of market)? What happens to the costs of services that can't be cut? Who pays them? Should the taxpayers in the low tax rate area assume some of these costs? Some of the low tax rate areas have bene- fitted from high assessed values. but others are low because taxpayers have consistently resisted higher spending programs. Should these taxpayers now assume the hurdens of those who are willing to pay the price of a lifestyle that carries high governmental costs? (a] The maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property shall not exceed One percent (1%) of the full cash value of such property. The one percent [ 1%) tax to be collected by the counties and apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties. (bl The limitation provided for in subdivision (a) shall not apply to ud valorem taxes or special assessments to pay the interest and redemption charges on any indebtedness approved bv the voters prior to the time this section becomes effective. Section 2. [a) The full cash value means the County Assessors valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 tax bill under "full cash value", or thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or 11 change in ownership has occured efter the 1975 assessment. All real property not already assessed up to the 1975·76 tax levels may be reassessed to reflect that valuation. (b) The Fair market value base may reflect from year to year the inflationary rate not to exceed two percent (2%) for any given year or reduction as shown in the consumer price index or comparable data for the area under taxing jurisdiction. Section 3. From and after the effective date of this article, any changes in State taxes enacted for the purpose of increasing revenues collected pursuant thereto whether by increased rates or changes in methods of computation n1ust be imposed by an Act passed by not less than two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses of the Legislature, except that no new ad valorem taxes on real property. or sales or transaction taxes on the sales of real proparty may be imposed. Section 4. Cities, Counties and special districts, by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of such district, may impose special taxes on such district, except ad valorem taxes on real property or a transaction tax or sales tax on the sale of real property within such City, County or special district. Section 5. This article shall take effect for the tax year beginning on July 1 following the passage of this Amendment, except Section 3 which shall become effective upon the pa5s.tge of this article. Section 6. If any section, part, clause, or phrase hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining sections shall not be affected but will remain in full force and effect. Printed by the California Tupayors' As~ociation 921 11th Street, Suire 800, S11crmn1mto, California 95814 RESOLUTIONS ·AND ·SUPPORTING .. DOCUMENTS -..! WARP.ANT NO. 40611 40612 '.,I 40613 40614 40615 40616 40617 40618 40619 40620 40621 40622 40623 40624 40625 40626 40627 40628 40629 40630 40631 40632 40633 40634 40635 40636 40637 '..._) 40638 40639 4~640 40641 40642 40643 40644 40645 40646 40647 40648 40649 40650 40651 40652 40653 40654 40655 40656. 40657 40658 40659 40660 40661· 40662 ~ 40663 40664 40665 40666 ·· ~A-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 14, 1978 ,TOINT OPERATING FUND ~ARRANTS Acme Medical Supplies, First Aid Supplies $ Air California, Air Fare Air Packs, Meter Scale Allied Supply Company, Valves The Anchor Packing Company,· Pump Parts Aqua Pipe & Supply Company, Rotor Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Conference Fee Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Banning Bat~ery Company, Batteries Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Pump Repair W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage CS Company, Pump Parts Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Company, Ear Protectors California Lithograph Corporation, Printing Campbell's Welding Service, Welding Carman Tool & Abrasives, Sm.all Tools Chevron USA, Inc., Gasoline Brian Chuchua's Four Wheel, Jeep & Truck Repair Clark Dye Hardware, Small Tools . William N. Clarke, Travel Expense Rei~bursement Coast Insurance Agency, Insurance Premitml College Lumber Company, Inc., Small Hardware Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental DME, Inc., Expansion Joint Daniels Tire Service, Tires Deco, Electrical Supplies John Deere Service Center, Parts Catalog Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Envirotech-Sparling, Pwnp Parts Erawan Garden Hotel, CASA Conference Fischer & Porter Company, Recorder Fountain Valley Camera, Photo Supplies Freeway Machine & Welding, Valve City of Fullerton, Water General Telephone Company, Phone Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Gould Inc-Warren & Baily Division, Pipe Fittings Harrington Industrial, Valve Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tire House of Batteries, Battery Howard Supply Company, Piping ICN Life Sciences Group, Water Sampling Industrial Insulation, Fiber Paper Instrumentation Specialties, Freight Charge ITT Grinnel Company, Pipe Roller Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Small Tools Kelly Pipe Company, Pipe Fittings AGENDA ITFM #8 -.ALL DISTRJCTS AJtOUNT 164.98 60.00 60.14 808.68 237.14 38.16 200.00 104.83 168.38 151.84 16.80 986.57 227.90 295.74 20.00 31.10 789.68 966.10 21.71 41.50 54,949.00 42.32 965.43 3,330.94 126.01 999.00 518.98 399.09 505.11 14.30 190.00 163.09 3,000.00 312.18 386.33 877.56 69.84 198.22 7.15 1,105.52 35.58 9,056.28 564.29 173.82 142.50 1,022.78 12.78 85.96 621.67 20.00 72.56 10.19 95.63 423.76 76.85 134.66 . "A-1" WA.RJWIT NO~ 40667 40668 40669 40670 40671 40672 40673 40674 40675 40676 40677 40678 40679 40680 40681 40682 40683 40684 40685 40686 40687 40~88 40689 40690 40691 40692 40693 40694 40695 40696 40697 40698 40699 40700 40701 40702 40703 40704 40705 40706 40707 40708 40709 40710 40711 40712 40713 40714 40715 40716 40717 40718 40719 40720 40721 40722 II A-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 14, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS King _Bearing, Inc., Pump Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniforms Lasco Industries, Fiberglass Sheeting Ray E. Lewis, Travel Expense Reimbursement Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lighting Motorola, Inc., Communications Equipment Nalco Chemical Company, Chemical Solution Newark Electronics; Meter City of Newport Beach, Sewer Grade Occidental College, Ocean Trawl Boat Service Office Equipment Specialists, Office Machine Repairs Orange Coast Hardwood, Paneling Oreo Tool & Equipment, Sander Repair Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Oxygen Service, Demurrage Pak West, Masking Tape M. C. Patten Corporation, Pressure Gauge Perkin-Elmer, Lab Supplies Pickwick Paper Products, Cleaning Supplies Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Supplies Productool, Inc., Tool Box The Register, Employment Ad Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Rewind Sargent Weich Scientific Company, Lab Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Sherwin Williams Company, Paint John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Flashers Southern California Edison, Power South Orange Supply, Piping Southern California Gas Company, Gas Starow Steel, Steel Stock Super Chem Corporation, Chemical Cleaning Agents The Suppliers, Adhesive J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement Taylor-Dunn, Truck Parts Thirty-nine Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies Thompson Building Materials, Drywall Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Lock & Keys Transit Mixed Concrete, Concrete Mix Travel Buffs, Air Fare Truck Auto Supply Company, Truck Parts US Glass, Truck Repair United Parcel Service, UPS Charge United ·states Equipment, Inc., Pump Parts Utilities Supply Company, Small Hardware VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings John ·R. Waples, Odor Control Western Salt Company, Lab Salt Wilson Paper Company, Aluminum Foil George Yardley Associates, Pump Parts AGENDA ITEr1 #8 -ALL. DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 881.86 323.49\_..J 391.35 . 1,188.80 154.34 59.00 291.03 346.94 .1,439.78 28.33 320.00 425.00 62. 00 . 386.84 26.73 368.02 23.40 93.87 154.32 267.41 497.26 47.70 27.77 61.20 47.70 767.78 113. 30 \.,,,) 36.05 71.41 392.39 32.82 835.50 8,506.36 3.69 3,186.04 107.34 306.08 162.48 444.79 236 .• 21 104.91 298.70 111.84 151.61 2,284.20 288.44 164. 30 19·.56 60.35 50.46 14. 70 501.64 ~ 210.40 126.94 113. 00 37.63 II A-2" . . ; it/ARRANT NO. 40723 40724 . II A-3" ~OINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 14, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS Donald Winn, Travel Expense Reimbursement Francis Wood, Travel Expense Reimbursement TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND .. AGENDA ITFM #8 -ALL. DISTRJ CTS $ AMOUNT 122.47 60.32 $ 113,938.48 "A-3" WARRANT NO. 40591 40592 40593 40594 40595 40596 40597 40598 40599 40600 40601 40602 40603 40604 40605 40606 40607 40608 40609 40610 "A-4" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 14, 1978 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS Butier Engineering, Inc., Contract Management P2-23 John Carollo Engineers, Retention Pl-16 John Carollo Engineers/Greely Hanson, Design Engr. P2-23 Commercial & CB Communications, Communication Equipment Deco, Olm Meter Donovan Construction Company, Retention Pl-16 Drew Carriage Company, Lawn Equipment Eastman, Inc., Office Furniture Gold Key Warehouse Showrooms, Furniture Howard Supply Company, Metal Chest James P. Kinney Company, Industrial Crane Miyake-Leece-Wood Associates, Warehouse Design Engineering Power House Ford Engines, Inc., Ford Industrial Engine Productool, Inc., Drill Press Progranunable Electronic Calculators, Calculators The Register, Bid Notice PW-061A & J-7-3B Skipper & Company, Retention PW-059 J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Blower Twinning Laboratories, Testing P2-23-1, 3, & 5 Valley Cities Supply, Office Equipment· TOTAL CORF TOTAL CORF & JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL. DISTRICTS ,,- AMQUNT $ 6, 468. o~'--" 26, 740.12 444.30 328.60 256.10 200,000.00 377.25 373.76 595.26 154.76 35 ,531. 20 2,718.94 3,123.04 47.70 424.00 211. 23 1,316.50 451.03 240.00 397.24 $ 280,199.03 $394,137.51 v II A-4" \wl, WARRANT NO. 40562 40563 40564 40565 WARRANT NO. 40566 40567 40568 40569 40570 40571 40572 40573 40574 WARRANT NO. 40575 40576 WARRANT NO. 40577 40578 '....' 40579 40580 40581 40582 40583 --·"B-I" DISTRICT NO. 1 .OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Ditronics,· Inc., Use Charge Refund Electronic Engineering, Use Charge Refund Lear Siegler, T.D. Division, Use Charge Refund Rapid Circuits, Use Charge Refund TOTAL DISTR~CT NO. 1 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATlNG FUND IN FAVOR OF Benge Trwnpet, Use Charge Refuna State of California, Annex 23 Processing Fee Fotomat Corporation,· Use Charge Refund Lok Ceiling Systems, Use Charge Refund Milford Rivet & Machine, Use Charge Refund Northrop Nortronics, Use Charge Refund School Pictures, Use Charge Refund Stepan Chemical, Use Charge Refund Winonics Corporation, Use Charge Refund· TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF Engineering-Science, Inc., Facilities Plan Report First National Bank of Orange, Easement 2-14-5 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING & ACO FUNDS DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Acme Wire Products, Use Charge Refund Di-Chem, Inc., Use Charge Refund Georgia Pacific, Use Charge Refund Kraft Foods, Use Charge Refund James H. Matthews & Company, Use Charge Refund Nutrilite, Use Charge Refund RFP Industries, Use Charge Refund TOrAL DISTRICT No. 3.oPERATING FUND "AGENDA ITEM #8 -AL.L DJSTRI CTS -"AMOUNT $ $ 39.00 607.00 397.00 104.00 1,147.00 AMOUNT $ 289.00 95.00 850.00 451.00 39.00 3,800.00 400.00 358.00 89.00 $ 6,371.00 AMOUNT $ $ $ 1,375.00 4,200.00 5,575.00 11,946.00 AMOUNT $ $ 10.00 114,00 1,389.00 649.00 242.00 132.00 96.00 2,632.00 "R-1" WARRANT NO. 40584 WARRANT NO. 40585 WARRANT NO. 40586 WARRANT NO. 40587 40588 40589 40590 "B-2" JNDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 14, 1978 ,DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY 1.N FAVOR ·op Boyle Engineering Corporation, Design Engineering 3-22-1 $ 5,292 .19 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO FUND TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 3 ACO & OPERATING FUNDS DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF Ecos Management Criteria, EIR, Jamboree TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 5 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 6 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Hughes Aircraft, Use Charge Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 6 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Bertea Corporation, Use Charge Refund Collins Radio, Use Charge Refund TRE Metal Processing, Use Charge Refund Thilkol/Dynachem, Use Charge Refund TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITFM. #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ 5,292.19 $ 7,924.19 AMOUNT $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 AMOUNT $ 427.00 $ 427.00 AMOUNT $ $ 643.00 448.00 327.00 1,151.00 2,569.00 "B-2" .~ .. WARRANT NO. 40755 40756 '--140757 40758 40759 40760 40761 40762 40763 40764 40765 40766 40767 40768 40769 40770 40771 40772 40773 40774 40775 40776 40777 40778 40779 40780 40781 ~40782 40783 40784 40785 40786 40787 40788 40789 40790 . 40791 40792 40793 40794 40795 40796 40797 40798 40799 40800 40801 40802 40803 40804 40805 40806 \._/ 40807 40808 40809 40810 40811 .. i·. -· f'·C-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 28, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS American Kleaner Mfg. Company, Inc., Gas Valve Associated of Los Angeles, Electrical Supplies Bacon Door Company, Inc., Door Frames Bank of America, Bonds & Coupons Collection Banning Battery Company, Batteries Bird Machine, Shaft Repairs Blue Diamond Materials, Concrete Mix Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services C & R Reconditioning Company, Shaft Repairs CS Company, Pump Parts Cal-Glass for Research, Inc., Lab Supplies Carman Tool & Abrasives, Grit Wheel Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Vacuum Truck Service Chevron USA, Inc., Fuel Clark Dye Hardware, Small Hardware Coast Nut & Bolt, Small Hardware. College Lumber Company, Inc~., J.,umber Compressor Products, Valves· ·. Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Control Specialists, Inc., Pmnp Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Crane Veyor Corporation, Parts Manual Deco, Electrical Supplies Diana Distributors, Freight Charge Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Engineers Sales ... Service .. Company, Pump Parts Void·. Flo-Systems, Pump Parts Foremost Threaded Products, Small Hardware City of Fullerton, Water General Telephone Company, Phone Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge Removal Gould Inc, Warren & Baily Division, Pwnp Parts M.E. Gray Company, Thermometer George T. Hall Company, Gas Valve Harrington Industrial, Piping Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Piping City of Huntington Beach, Water Inland Empire Equipment Company, Oil Filter International Harvester Company, Tank Assembly ISA, Lab Supplies Kaman Bearing & Supply, Bearings Kelco Sales & Engineering Company, Compressor Parts King Bearing, Inc., Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools LA Chemical, Weed Killer · LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniforms W.R. Ladewig Company, Valve Adapters ·L-ancaster t)phol stery, Auto Repair Laursen Color Lab, Film Processing Lewco Electric Company, Generator Repairs Lifecom-Saftey Service Supply, Safety Equipment AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 46.01 768.22 123.49 21.75 276.50 1,000.00 11.90 207.39 290.00 1,009.63 36 .• 51 31.10 204.05 7,229.92 32.89 63.60 71.56 1,441.40 99.59 2,914.57 76.59 57.02 395.50 33.44 1,623.11 33.17 351.61 349.80 .oo 3,878.79 251.98 15.00 209.35 4,626.81 24.04 221.96 42.15 90.09 366.61 934.50 954.28 29.30 16.64 152.00 22.79 400.70 308.77 137.38 150.29 649.25 116. 97 571.60 8.85 244.80 6.36 75.22 509.36 "C-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 28, 1978 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 40812 40813 40814 40815 40816 40817 40818 40819 40820 40821 40822 40823 40824 40825 40826 40827 40828 40829 40830 40831 40832 40833 40834 40835 40836 40837 40838 40839 40840 40841 40842 40843 40844 40845 40846 40847 40848 40849 40850 40851 40852 40853 40854 40855 40856 40857 40858 40859 40860 40861 40862 40863 40864 40865 40866 40867 "C-.2" McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Small Tools Master ·Blueprint & Supply, Blueprint Copies Moore Products Company, Pump Parts Motorola, Inc., Communications Equipment National Lumber Supply, Hardware City of Newport Beach, Water Nordco Products, Chain Links OMM Enterprises, Inc., Janitorial Supplies· Orange County Chemical Company, Chemicals . Orange County Equipment Company, Small Tools Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamps Orange Valve & Fitting Company, Pipe Fittings Oreo Tool & Equipment, Sander Repair · Oscar's Lock & Safe, Keys Osterbauer Compressor Service, Pump Parts Oxygen Service, Demurrage Pacific Telephone Company,. Signal Circuits Pickwick Paper Products, Office Supplies Power House Ford Engines, Truck Parts Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Supplies Printec Corporation, Paper The Pryor Giggey Company, Thermometer Quality Tool Service, Tool Repair Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash.Disposal Void Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Safety Supplies Service Tape & Label Company, Mailing Supplies Sherwin Williams Company, Paint & Supplies Signal-Flash Company, Barricades Southern California Edison Company, Power South Orange Supply, Pipe Fi tting·s Southern California Gas Company, Gas Southern California Water Company, Water Southern Counties Oil Company, Fuel Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water Starow Steel, Steel Bars Stauffer Chemical Company, Chemicals Super Chem Corporation, Detergents The Suppliers, Chain Link Fencing Floyd Tanner, Insurance Premimum Overpayment Taylor-Dunn, Compressor Parts Taylor Instruments, Test Equipment Thomas Brothers Maps, Maps Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J. G. Tucker · & 'Son, Inc. , Pump Parts Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline US Pipe & Foundry, Steel Piping United.Parcel Service, UPS Charges United States Equipment, Inc., Pump Parts U.S. Government, Subscription to Federal Register Utilities Supply Company, Small Tools VBA Cryogenics, Demurrage. AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS . AMOUNT "$ 55.78 40.t _) 236.'lY 346.94 173.95 45.88 40.05 134.52 31.80 66.99 .41.15 72.37 123.07 8.11 679.30 23.40 261. 70 49.29 14.37 15.90 198.22 448.38 52.31 83.70 .00 497.35 370.C' 117.~ 87.77 120.71 292.51 578.50 33,719.96 378.08 297.17 6.26 6,191.45 405.58 161.17 1,538.65 490.25 59.07 10.00 203.75 141.27 I.526.09 108.88 251.27 10.05 8.97 2;120.00 38.7 176.~ 50.00 334.25 27.30 "C-2" ,- WARRANT NO. 40868 . .40869 \.,,,,,140810 4_9871 40872 40873 40874 40875 "-"'. . . "C-3" joINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 28, 1978 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS Valley Cities Supply Company, Welding Supplies Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Weber Plywood Company, Lumber Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Thomas L. Woodruff, ·Legal Services Xerox Computer Service, Computer Service Xerox Corporation, Xerox Reproduction George Yardley Associates, Pump Parts TOTAL JOINI' OPERATING FUND ·•. ·. AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS I AMOUNT $ 759.27 590.63 487.81 125.35 3,114.28 4,466.72 1,854.06 3.98 $ 98,782.11 "C-3" WARRANT NO. 40742 40743 40744 40745 40746 40747 40748 40749 40750 40751 40752 40753 40754 "C-4" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 28, 1978 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS Bassett.Office Furniture Company, Office Furniture Cal-Quip Company, Freight Charges John Carollo Engineers, Pl-16 Instruction John Carollo Engineers/Greely Hanson, P2-23 Construction Daily Pilot, Legal Ad Bid A-087 and P-030 Void Johnson Steel Corporation, Contract J-6-lE Peat Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Revenue Program Tom Ponton Industries, Inc., Calibrator Productool, Inc., Gauge The Register, Legal Ad PW-063 Skipper and Company, Contract PW-055-1 Sun Electric Corporation, Tachometer TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DJSTRICTS AMOUNT $, 718. 76 14 .'LJ 10,750.0/ 12,251.46 20.84 .oo 10,800.00 16,473.36 315.09 .445.20 118.10 3,893.00 343.44 $ 56,143.72 $ 154,925.83 "C-4" ,- INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 28, 1978 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~,. 40733 E. A. Silzle Company, Inc., Use Charge Overpayment TOTAL DISTRICT 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANT NO. DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF 40734 \..,J WARRANT NO. 40736 WARRANT NO. 40737 40738 WARRANT NO. ~ 40739 Lowry and Associates, Design Engineering 2-20 TOTAL DISTRICT 2 ACO Ftn~D . •.· TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 2 ·-: ... DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Jim Walter Corporation, Use Charge Overpayment TOTAL DISTRICT 3 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY IN FAVOR OF Kordick & Rados, A Joint Venture, Contract 3-20-3 The Register, Legal Ad 3-22-1 TOTAL DISTRICT 3 ACO FUND DISTRICT NO. 3 FACILITIES· REVOLVING IN FAVOR OF City of Buena Park, Connection Fee Refund TOTAL DISTRICT 3 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND :.: . .;.-:.'I,, •• ,, "TI-1" TOTAL DIST}JICT· NO. 3 . . · " ·AtiFNtiA ITEM #8 -ALL DJSTRI CTS. AMOUNT , __ _ $ 50.00 $ 50.00 AMOUNT $ 2,515.78 $ 2,515.78 $ 2,565_78 · AMOUNT $ 45.00 $ 45.00 AMOUNT $ 90,000.00 237.71 $ 90,237.71 AMOUNT $ 475.00 $ 475.00 $ 95,811~30 'D-1" ·WARRANT NO. 40740 WARRANT NO. 40741 "D-2" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS PAID FEBRUARY 28, 1978 J>ISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF Rewes-Schock, J.V., Manhole Repair TOTAL DISTRICT 5 OPERATING FUND DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND IN FAVOR OF State of California, Annex 67 ~rocessing Fee TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND AGENDA ITEM #8 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $• 1, 260. 45 $ 1,260.45 AMOUNT $ 95.00 $ 95.00 ''D-2" "E" RESOLUTION NO. 78-33 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. PW-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS • OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR NEW FIBERGLASS VENTILATION SYSTEM AT GRIT CHAMBERS AND BAR SCREENS, HEADWORKS ."C", PLANf NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-063 * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recornmendation·this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Hickman Bros., Inc. for New Fiberglass Ventilation .System at Grit Chambers and Bar Screens, Headworks "C", Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-063, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. PW-063 be awarded to Hickman Bros., Inc. in the total amount of $37,600.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; ~d, Sectfon 3. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the 1.Dlsuccessful bidders; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(a) -ALL DISTRICTS "E" "F" RESOLUTION NO. 78-50 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR COMPRESSOR AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-064A A RESOLtrrION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR COMPRESSOR AT PLANf·NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-064A * * * * * * * * * * * * T • The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 pf Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the det.ailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for Acquisition of Plant Air Compressor at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-064A, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, ·v Section 3. That said bids will be 'received until 11:00 a.m., March 30, 1978, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM fl9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II F" II G" RESOLtrrION NO. 78-34 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS "C" GRIT HOPPER AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS ·FOR MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS "C" GRIT HOPPER AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-065 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11.of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for Modification of Headworks "C" Grit Hopper at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-065, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., March 30, 1978, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9Co) -ALL DISTRitTS "G" "H-1" RESOLUTION NO. 78-35 REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR REPLACEMENT OF AIR CONDITIONING FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING BUILDING, JOB NO. J-7-3B, AND AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR SAID WORK A RESOLlTfION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2., 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF . ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR REPLACEMENT OF AIR CONDITIONING FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING BUILDING, JOB NO. J-7-3B, AND AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR SAID WORK * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, ·do hereby determine that: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration and Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-3B, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4755 of the State Health and Safety Code, and on February 23, 1978, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and WHEREAS, the apparent low bid has been evaluated by the Districts' engineer~ and the bid exceeds the engineers' estimate by approximately twenty-three percent (23%); and WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer has ~his day submitted a.written recommendation that said bids be rejected. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Chief Engineer be received and ordered filed; and .Section 2. That all bids received for said work be hereby rejected and that all bid bonds be returned to the bidders; and Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate and execute a contract for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administra- tion and Engineering Building for an amotmt not to exceed $68,000.00, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" -· ~ B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET JOB NO •. 'J .. 7 .. 3B February g3, 1978 11:00 A.M. PROJECT TITLE REPLACEMENT OF AIR CONDITIONING FOR APMIN,/ENGR. BUILDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION The work in general shall consist ·or ·summer-winter air conditioning and exhaust systems for public and employee areas. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 60,000. BUDGET. AMOUNT $ ------- REMARKS _________________________________________________________ _ CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1 Campbell Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc • • $73,800.00 Anaheim, CA 2 Thermalair, Inc • • ... $79,850.00 South El Monte, CA .3. 4. I recommend rejecting all bids for Replacement of Air Conditioning for Administration & Engineering Building, Job No. J-7-3B and that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate and execute a contract for said work in an amount not to exceed $68,000. "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DI'STRICTS "H-2" II J II RESOLUfION NO. 78-36 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION, JOB NO. J-13-2 * * * * * * * * * 1be Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, speci~ications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for Warehouse Office Expansion, Job No. J-13-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, . Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., April 27, 1978, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM. #9(G) -ALL DISTRlCTS II I II II Jll RESOLUTION NO. 78-51 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTRIC MOTOR FOR NEW BIRD HB-64, 000 CENTRIFUGE, JOB NO. P2-15-1A A RESOLITTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE cou~rrY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTRIC MOTOR FOR NEW BIRD HB-64,000 CENTRIFUGE, JOB NO. P2-15-1A * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of Cot.mty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer for Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge, Job No. P2-15-1A, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., March 30, 1978, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9{H) -ALL DJSTRJCTS II Jll COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -1084~ ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A -----------------------c. o. N0. ____ 1 _____________ ~ DATE ________ F_e_br_u_a_r_y_2_1_, __ 19_7_8_'-J--_·. __ _ CONTRACTOR: _____ s_k_i_pp_e_r __ &_C_o_m_p_a_n_Y ____________________ _ JOB: Interplant Odor Control Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-055-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~ $ 306.18 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following. additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD: To make caustic delivery possible, piping had to be added to the fill pipe on the caustic tank so that it.would be at the correct elevation for the delivery truck. ·.TOTAL ADD No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~i<) Amended Contract Price loard authorization date: March 8, 1978 Approved: $306.18 $306.18 $ 119 ,490. 00 s ______ o_.o_o ______ __ $ 306.18 ------------------ $ 119' 796. 18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By __________________________ ~----- 1y __________________________________ __ Ch i e f Engineer Contractor AGENDA ITEM ft9(1) ALL DISTRICTS "K"· INSPECTION I TESTING ENGINEERS RESEARCH I ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING CORROSION ENGINEERING I ANALYSIS ULTRASONIC MA6NETIC I PENETRANT . 'c HEM IC Al I PHYSICAL AN ALY SIS lADIOGllAPHY X·llAY GAMMA RAY 0. I • 1 4 1 J J I 0 A I r p o r t W • J '...,,! L0119 Buch, Cellf. 90801 P•JJ 426-JJSS • f21JJ 6l6-2Jl6 • (714J 12M4J2 1114·D North Herper Str••• S111te AMI, Callforale 92703 p14J s31.204s "L" February 21, 1978 Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer County Sanitation District of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 RE: IMPROVED TREATMENT FACILITIES AT PLANT 12 Huntington Beach, California (Testing Services) Dear Mr. Lewis: We wish· to thank you for your invitation to submit this proposal for above reference project. I am enclosing our current Schedule of Fees for your reYiew and approval, except for the.following change. A discount of fifteen per cent (15%) will be applied to all Materials Testing required· as per your letter of February 14, 1978, if payment is received within 30 days from date of Invoice. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, TWINING LABORATORIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Chas. B. Locke Vice-President & Branch Manager CBL:slb Enclosures -Schedule of 'Fees -Twining Schedule of Fees -Soils 9/1/77 7/1/77 Scientific Affilt1tion of Principals Americen Concrete Institute, American Society of CMI En9lneers, AmorlcH Society of Tostin9 & Materials, Americ111 We~din9 Society, National Society of Profeuloftal En9ineors, Structural En9ineen Association II L" SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 17811 SKY PARK CIRCLE OR., SUITE 9·M, IRVINE, CALIF'. 92714 • T&:LE 540•6066 CORPORATION OF'FICE-6280 RIVERDALE ST,. SAN DIEGO, CALIF'. 92120 •TELE 280·4321 February 28, 1978 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer Dear Mr. Lewis: Pursuant to our submittal of February 27, 1978, we propose to provide services as required for soils and concrete for the 75 MGD Treatment Plant #2, Huntington Beach, for a discount of 15% of all materials testing as set forth in our Schedule of Fees dated January 1, 1978. We will appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this project. Yours very truly, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. '~Jful.e: ~:::~ tf~~ President and Director of Business Development JWK/kk \.J SAN .CIEGD • PALM DESERT • ESCONDIDO 0 IRVINE "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(o)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "M" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. __ c_-_06_-_1_0....:73 __ -_1_1 o ___ _ C .O. NO. 5 -----------------------DATE _________ F e_b_r_u_a_r~y __ 1 s_, __ 1~9~7_8 __ ___ CO~RACTOR: _____ P_a_sc_a_l __ & __ Lu_d_w_i~g------------------------- J·os: FLOOD WALL Arm s ITE DEVELOPMENT -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT 2 Job :'o·. P2-23-1 Amount of this Change Order (~D~ (DEDUCT) $ (40.900.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or· contract work are hereby authorized and as .compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approvedo The work to be deleted is basically site improvement work around.the Operations Center. The present state of completion of the Operations Center is such that P2-23-1 contractor cannot complete the work items until P2-23-5 contractor completes all below grade construction. The items affected by this condition are detailed as follows: DELETE: 4,680 c.y. compacted fill Catch Basins and ·1211 RCP Storm Drain Piping Electrical Uuct Run fran Manhole No. 4 to Manhole No. 5, not including Manholes TOTAL DELETED WORK TH IS CHANGE ORDER .. $ 5,380.00 ~,100.00 30,420.00 ($40,900.00) The deleted work is to be added to Job No. P2-23-5 (C-06-1073-120)° Operations Center, under construction:by the same contractor, Pascal & Ludwig. The best interests of the Districts and the contractor will be met by this exchange of contract work at no added overall contract costs. There will be no extension of time to the P2-23-l job. Board authorization date: March 8, 1978 Consulting Engineer ay ________________________________ ___ Contractor Original Contract Price · $ 2,268,420.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 31,720.98 This Change ~ (DEDUCT) $ (40, 900. 00) Amended Contract Price $ 2,259,240.98 · Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By ____________________ ~~ ........ ~~-- Ch i e f Engineer II N" A,GENDA ITFM #9(p) ALL. DI STRJ CTS "N" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-1 20 --------__.;...:;,_. ________ __ C.O. NO·------------------~ CONTRACTOR: ______ P~a~sc_a_l __ & __ L_u_d_w_ig..._ ____ __, ________________ _ DATE February 15, 1978 JOB: OPERATIONS CENTER -75 MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 Job No. P2-23-5 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~XD~tX) $ 40,900.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The work to be added is basically site improvement work around the Operations Center. The present state of Completion of the Operations Center is such that P2-23-1 contractor cannot complete the work i terns unt.i 1 P2-23-5 contractor completes a 11 the below grade construction. The items to be added to this contract are as follows: ADD: 4, 680 c. y. ·compacted f il 1 Catch basins and 12n RCP.storm drain piping E1ectrical duct run from Manhole No. 4 to Manhole No. 5, not including manholes TOTAL ADDED WORK THIS CHAUGE ORDER $ 5,380.00 s. 100.00 30,420.00 $40,900.00 The added work wi11 be de1eted from Job No. P2-23-1 (C-06-1073-110) Flood Wall and Site Development, under construction by the same contractor, Pasca1 & Ludwig. The best interest of the Districts and the contractor will be met by this exchange of contract work at no added overall contract costs. The contractor is requesting 30 days time extension to comp 1 ete this'. added work. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract uate Original Contract Time Original Completion Date July 6, 1977 240 Calendar Days March 3, 1978 Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time 30 Calendar Days 30 Calendar Days 270 Calendar Day Revised Comoletion Date Aori l 2, 1 ~78 Original Contract Price · $ 1,149,296.00 Prev. Auth. Changes s _________ o_.o_o _____ __ This Change (ADD) {»&~ijgi) $ 40,900.00 ------------------ Amended Contract Price $ · 1 ' 190' 19 6. 00 SoQrd authorization date: March 8, 1978 Approved: Sy ------------------------------------Cons u 1 ting Engineer Zy ------------------------------------Contractor. "O" AGENDA IlfM #9(Q) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By --------------------------~-----Chief Engir.ces ALL. DJSTRI CTS "O" : STATE OF CAllfORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR.. Gournot STAlf WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ~·BOX too • SACRAMENTO 95801 (9 ti) •HS.7971 "P-1" FEB 15 1978 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts o.f Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 In Reply Re.fer to: 520:WMS PROJECT NO. C-06-1073, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, 75 MGD SECONDARY TREATMENT, CONCEPT APPROVAL AMENDMENT The Division of Water Quality, with the concurrence of the Environmental Protection Agency, hereby amends the Concept Approval Letter for the subject project, .dated April 6, 1976, to include: 1. Construction o.f anaerobic digesters su.fficient to handle the waste activated sludge generated by 75 MGD high purity oxygen activated sludge plant cur- rently under construction. 2. Installation o.f sludge dewatering equipment designed to handle waste activated sludge generated by the 75 MGD activated sludge plant. 3. Necessary piping and appurtenances. Determination of final design criteria will be made at the time of ten percent design review. The eligible project cost .for the above facilities is estimated at $12,620,000. CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT APPROVAL: This concept approval is contingent on the following: 1. Receipt of the complete final plans and specifications within 8 months o.f grant award. 2. Receipt of the complete draft Operations and Mainte- nance manual and proposed Instructional Program, within 30 days .following award of the construction contract. I.f the above docwnents are not submitted as specified above, concept approval may be withdrawn. AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -ALL. DISTRICTS ''P-1" "P-2" Mr. Fred Harper -2- INSTRUCTIONS PERTAINING TO THE PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: Concept approval amendment is your authorization to proceed with preparation of final plans and specifications. The Step 2 grant will be amended to include the above :facilities. After design work has been started, the information outlined below should be submitted in some fashion (design drawings, design notes, calculations, flow schematics, etc.) either by meetings with our staff or in a written :format (preferably). We are not concerned so much with the format o:f these "in progress" reviews as we are with the .fact that they are ac- complished. The information desired is as follows: 1. At the estimated 10 percent design completion level (within 60 days of grant award), the submission should include, as a minimum, process schematics, finalized design criteria with supporting calculations regard~ ing process unit sizing, solids balance sheet, and proposed service building floor plans delineating dimensions. 2. At about the 50 percent completion point (within 120 days of grant award), the submission should include available design drawings, pumpings and piping dia- grams and supporting design calculations. The Mechanical and Architectural design drawings should also be submitted. Additionally, only the mechanical portions of the "draft"· specifications re;-g., pumps, blowers, etc.) should be submitted. After the material is reviewed by our staff and, if a meeting is warranted, you will be contacted for an informal review meeting. For :further information and for mailing arrangements for submittals, please contact the Facilities Design Section at (916) 322-3007. Upon completion o:f :final_ plans and specifications, the following must be submitted to this office for review: 1. Two signed sets o:f the final plans and specifications. 2. An updated project cost estimate which includes a breakdown.of all engineering costs, (i.e., Project Report, plans and specifications, inspection, soil testing, etc.), O&M Manual, Revenue Program, and other costs. AGENDA ITEM #9Cv) -ALL. DISTRICTS "P-2" ··. Mr. Fred Harper -3- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS NEEDED PRIGR TO STEP 3 CER'l'.lFICATION: A Document Request List will be forwarded to you during the Step 2 design period. Please submit the requested documents and information so they may be reviewed and approved without delaying the issuance of the Step 3 construction award. This concept approval includes only that project described above and does not include any associated projects which may have been referred to in the Project Report and does not guarantee grant funding on any. subsequent project which may be necessa~y to assure that the a.pproved project is functional. Should you have any questions, please contact Mike Stallard, the State evaluator assigned to your project, at (916) 322-6468 • (.~-Y"r~ . -~1vt?/; .. v\ / -Neil Dunham ~-Division Chief Manager -Clean Water Grant Program cc: CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region (8) .. :" .. ,,p 3" ' . -AGENDA ITEM #9(v) -ALL DISTRJCTS ·"P-3" RESOLtrrlON NO. 78-37 OBTAINING BANKAMERICARD ACCOMMODATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO OBTAIN BANKAMERICARD ACCOMMODATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, desires to obtain financial acconunodations from BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, (hereinafter called BANK), pursuant to the use of a number of BANK's credit cards (hereinafter called BankAmericards) by the officers and agents of this District; and, WHEREAS, this District intends to authorize its officers and agents to use such BankArnericards for and in connection with District business; and, WHEREAS, BANK will not extend such accommodations by issuing such BankAmericards unless this District agrees to assume sole responsibility for the use of such BankAmericards or any of them, and to pay BANK for all indebtedness incurred by use of such BankAmericards or any of them, whether such use or indebtedness was authorized or unauthorized by this District. NOW, THEREFORE: The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, .2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 1_, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, apply to BANK for the issuance of a sufficient number of BankArnericards as, in the judgment of the officer or officers hereinafter authoriz·ed, this District· may require; and, "Q-1" AGE~DA ITEM t:9 .. <w> -ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1" "Q-2". Section 2. That J. Wayne Sylvester, the Director of Finance ~f this District, be and is hereby authorized, directed and empowered, in the name of this District, to apply to BANK for the issuance of such BankAmericards and to execute such application forms and agreements to pay all indebtedness incurred by use of such Bank.Americards, whether authorized or unauthorized, as BANK may require; and, Section 3. That BANK is authorized to act upon this resolution until written notice of its revocation is delivered to BANK, and that the authority hereby granted shall apply with equal force and effect to the successors in office of the officers herein named; and, Section 4. That the specimen signatures appearing below are the signatures of the officers authorized to sign for this District by virtue of this resolution: Fred Harper, General Man.ager J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance and Board Secretary Ray E. Lewis, Chief Engineer William N. Clarke, Superintendent PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA I TF.M #9 ( w r-AL.L DJ STR I CTS "Q-2" RESOLUTION NO. 78-38 ADOPTING PREVAILING WAGE RATES TO BE PAID BY CONTRACTORS AS DETERMINED BY DIRECTOR OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PREVAILING RATES OF WAGES TO BE PAID TO ALL WORKMEN EMPLOYED ON PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS WITHIN THE DISTRICTS AS DETERMINED BY THE DI RECTOR OF TI-IE STATE DEPARnffiNT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, UNTIL THE AMENDMENT OR REVOCATION OF THIS RESOLUTION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·, WHEREAS, Section 1771 of the Labor Code of the State of California requires that not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages shall be paid to all workmen employed on public works contracts; and WHEREAS, Section 1770 of the Labor Code of The State of California requires that the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations shal 1 determine· the prevailing rate of per diem wages for the locality; and WHEREAS, the Director has determined and published the prevailing rate of per diem wages for Orange County; and WHEREAS, Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California requires that any body awarding any contract for public works shall obtain from the State Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in the locality in which the public work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute the contract, and further allows such public body to incorporate, by reference thereto, said prevailing rates in the Notice Inviting Bids, specifications and contract, and indicate that a copy is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Districts rather than setting forth said per diem rates in each call for bids, in the bid specifications and in the contract itself. NOW, 'nlEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l~ 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange Coun~y, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) -ALL DISTRICTS II R-1" -. . Section 1. That the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each ·~ craft, classification, or type of workm.CJ.n needed to execute public works contracts and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work for each craft, classification, or type of workman are in accordance with the schedules determined and published by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations, and are one file in the office of the Secretary. of the Boards of Directors; and Section 2. That a copy of this resolution shall be posted at each jobsite prior to ~he commencement of any work; and Section 3. That Resolution No. 77-37 and any other·resolutions, motions or portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978 ."R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9Cx) ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" "S" RESOLUTION NO. 78-40-3 APPROVING UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7lIT-5118 (REV.) WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7lIT-5118 (REV.) WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RE CONTRACTS NOS. 3-4C, 3-10, 3-16, 3-19 AND LA HABRA PURCHASE SECTION * * * * * *·* * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange ColDlty, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE .AND ORDER: Section I. That the certain Utiliti~s Agreement No. 71JI'-5118 (Rev.), dated March 8, 1978, between Cotmty Sanitation District No. 3 and the State of California Department of Transportation, for adjustment of approximately 135 sanitary sewer manholes to grade, in connection with the following District trunk sewers: Miller~Holder Tnmk, Contract No. 3-4C Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract No. 3-10 Beach Relief Trunk, Contract No. 3-16 Imperial Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-19 Line "W" & Line "E" of the ·La Habra Purchase Section, is hereby approved and accepted; and Section 2. That payment.in an amol.lllt not to exceed $15,500.00 for said Utilities Agreement is hereby authorized; and Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Utilities Agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. J AGEN~A ITEM #9(z) -DISTRICT 3 . "S" . l v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_l_A __ ~---~~~- ~ C .O. NO. ____ l~------~~~~ CONTRACTOR:~_K_O_RD_I_C_K_& __ RAD __ o_s~,_A __ J_OI_NT ___ VE_NTU ___ RE ____ ~----DATE __ ~--~-F_e_b_ru_a_ry..£-·-2~1~,~19~7~8:,_.._ JOB: Knott Inte~ceptor, Portion of Reach .7, Contract. No. 3-20-3 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 00.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Substitution in pipe size from 42" RCP as specified in Bid Items Nos. 2 & 8 to 45 11 RCP. .·This· change is necessary ·because of the unavailability of 42" forms. This change will be ma.de at no cost to the District. No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price · Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Board authorizat·1on date·. March 8 1978 , Approved: $ 3,880,113.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 3,880,113.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange Contractor .. ; ·' "T" AGENDA ITEM #9(AA) -DISTRICT 3 "T" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ___ 2------------~~~J1.-- CONTRACTOR: ____ K_o_r_d_i_ck __ &_·_R_a_d_o_s~,_a __ J_o_i_n_t_V_e_n_t_u_r_e ______ • __ __ DATE February 21,-1978 --------------------------~ JOB: Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-3 Amount of this Change Order (YAW) {DEDUCT) $ (4,949.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and-as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. DEDUCT: 1. Realignment of future Orangethrope Sewer required relocation of the manhole at Station 0+77.19. Reduction of 14 L.F. of Bid Items No. 2 at $350.00/L.F. = 2. Modifications to city medians on Knott Avenue requested by City of Buena Park. Reduction of 14 L.F. of Bid Item No. 23 at $3.SQ/L.F.= TOTAL DEDUCTION No time extension this change order. ·. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change 6Aoo3 {DE DUCT) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: March 8, 1978 Approved: $4,900.00 49.00 $4,949.00 $ 3? 8801113. 00 $ 0.00 $ (4 1 949. 00) $ 3,875,164.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California KORDICK & RADOS, a Joint Venture ~- By ---------------------------------- By------------------~~--=--=---:-----C hie f Engineer · Contractor "U" AGENDA ITE~ #~(BB)·-DISTRICT 3 II U" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127·-10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ N_/_A ______ ~----- 2 C.O. NO. --------------~------Cdrri'RACTOR: F. 8. COOK CORPORATION 0 A TE February 21, 1978 --------------------------------------~------------------------------ JOB: REPAIR Or PLASTIC LINED MANHOLE. SHAFTS, MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 3-lR-3 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (IKINKI) $ 544.50 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Two M-3644 pressure type frames and covers as manufactured by E. B. Moritz Foundry to be installed on OCSD Contract .No. 3-1 Sewer in conjunction with Co~tract No. 3-lR-3 repair work. These items to be furnished to facilitate odor problems associated with that area of the line to be located near the intersection of Onyx and Chapman in Garden Grove. Two manhole frames and covers each at $272.25 TOTAL ADD The Contractor is hereby granted a time extension of five calendar days for the above item. f "MARY OF CONTRACT TIME . ......_! . Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date . . Joard authorization date: March 8, 1978 July 29, 1977 120 Calendar Days Novmeber 25, 1977 5 Calendar Days 15 Calendar Days 135 ·Calendar Days December 10, 1977 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (DBOOm) Amended Contract Price Approved: COUNTY SANITATION $ $ $ $ $544.50 $544.50 48,431.20 6,200.00 544.50 55,175.70 DISTRICTS of ·~ F. B. COOK CORPORATION Orange County, California By~~Chlef Engineer DISTRICT 3 "V" "W" RESOLUTION NO. 78-42-5 APPROVING UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7UT-5160 WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTR!Cf NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7UT-5160 WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RE COAST HIGHWAY TRUNKS "A" AND "B" AND CONTRACT NO. 5-19 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5160 dated March 8, 1978, between County Sanitation District No. 5 and the State of California Department of Transportation, for adjustment of approximately 100 sanitary sewer manholes to grade, in connection with Coast Highway Trunks "N' and "B" and Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-19, is hereby approved and accepted; and Section 2. That payment in an amount not to exceed $11,500.00 for said Utilities Agreement is hereby authorized; and Section 3. ·That the Chairman and'Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Utilities Agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by·the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(EE) -DISTRICT 5 ; . '..,.! ;, ,.. ~'X-1" RESOLUTION NO. 78-43-5 DETACHMENT FROM IRWD OF TERRITORY INCLUDED IN ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO DISTRICT NO. 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. S, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO DETACH TERRITORY FROM IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT THAT WAS INCLUDED IN ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County has heretofor annexed approximately 6.29 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the San Joaquin Reservoir, which said annexa~ion has been assigned the .designation of Annexation No. 6 -Harbor View Hills, Sector IV, Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5; and, WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commissi~n has required that said ter- ritory be detached from the Irvine Ranch Water District as a condition of said Annexation No. 6. NOW, THEREFORE: The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for detachment of territory from the Irvine Ranch Water District be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of adjusting the Irvine Ranch Water District's boundary by detaching 6.29 acres of real property as required by the Local Agency Formation Commission as a condition of annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 5; and, Section 3. That the territory to be detached is uninhabited; and, AGE~DA ITFM ~9CFF) -DISTRICT 5 "X-1" . .. Section 4. That the designation assigned said detachment is "Detachment No. 10 (Harbor View Hills., Sector IV) from Irvine Ranch Water District", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, ·, Section 5. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this detachment. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITrM #9(FF) -DJSTRICT 5 "X-2" .. .. .. ·' . , ,. . , . INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS COUNlY SANITATION DISTRH of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORN1; P.O. BOX 8127 108.f.4 £LllS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92701' (71.C) 5.C0-2910 171.C) 962-2.Cll This form shall be. completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the California EnvirorL~ental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, dated January 12, 1917. Title and Location of Project Sanitation District No. 5 Santa Ana.River Siphon Desc~iption of Project Construction of a 33" siphon acros·s· the Santa Ana River bed ·above Pacific Coast Highway GUIDELINES -1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 2S? · Yes X No (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form) 2. Does the project qualify as: a. Ministerial (Section SJ Yes b. .Emergency (Section 13) Yes __ No X No X c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 31) Yes~-No X d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 42) Yes__ No X e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 33) Yes No_x_ (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.) . "Y-1" . AGENDA ITEM #9(GG) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "Y-1" • . - . . . . . · .·-. .: ... ~ ... If there is no af~j.::;:zi2""·i~ • ...ectian to Item 2 above, complete the following: 3. Initial study procedures A. Evaluating En'V.:~ :_._.-.,..~~.~.-·._..~~..I Sign~ficance (See Section 32) , 1. Will the project have any significant effect Qn the environment as per the .following: a. b. c. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have been adopted by the community where the project is to be located? Yes No X Does it have .R.substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect? Yes No_x_ Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species· -. of animal or plan~, o~ habitat of such a species? Yes ~-No X d. e. g. h. i. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? ·Yes No X Does it breach any published national, state or local standards•relating to solid waste or litter control? Yes No _x.._ Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas? Yes No ~x_. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? Yes No _x_ .. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation? Yes No X Could it.expose people or structures to major geologic hazards? Yes No _:..!._ j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No X If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail • • ·. If there is affinnative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report may be required. 4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown V in the "Guidelines Implementing the California Envirorunental Quality Act of 1970 as Amended" "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM. #9(GG) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "Y-2" 2, . .. .. • • ,'-.. ' . ~ . S. If an Environmen~aJ.-I~pact Report is required 1 explain below procedures in causing preparation of same. "Y-3" . . ·-.. . ~-... AGEND~ ITE~ #~(GG) .-DISTRICTS 5 & 6 3. 2/28/78 Date "Y-3" "Z" RESOLtrrION NO. 78-44-6 APFROVING UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7UT-5175 WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION A RESOLlITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7UT-5175 WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RE NEWPORT BOULEVARD TRUNK * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section I. That the certain Utilities Agreement No. 7UT-5175 dated March 8, 1978, between County Sanitation District No. 6 and the State of California Department of Transportation, for adjustment of approximately three sanitary sewer manholes to grade, in connection with the Newport Boulevard TrWlk, is hereby approved .and accepted; and Section 2. That payment in an amount not to exceed $350.00 for said Utilities Agreement is hereby authorized; and Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to executes said Utilities Agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. AGENDA ITEM #9(HH) -DISTRICT 6 . ·. "Z" II AA" February 17, 1978 Board of Directors County Sanit~tion District No. 7 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 It is hereby requested that the property described as Lot 9 of Tract 1968 in the County of Orange near the intersection of Sirrine Drive and Overhill and more particularly described and shown on the legal description and map enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures, be annexed to the District. The following information is also submitted herewith in connection with this request for anne.xa tion: Property owners: Address: Telephone number: Acreage: Assessed value: Registered voters: Roy G. and Rowene A. Medina 1791·Sirrine Drive Santa Aha, Calif. 92705 714-731-2496 O. 784 acres $20,420 2 Also enclosed herewith is the Initial Study Form required by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Also, a check in the amount of $500.00 representing the Districts processing fee is enclosed herewith. Ro~~~ ~a~ AGENDA ITFM #9(MM) -DISTRICT 7 II AA" "BB-1" RESOLUTION NO. 78-52-7 AMENDING ANNEXATION POLICY RE PLANNING S1UDY FEE FOR AREAS TRIBUTARY TO PETERS CANYON A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-44-7, AS AMENDED, ESTABLISH- ING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO TIIE DISTRICT, RE PAYMENT OF AREA-WIDE PLANNING STUDY FEE FOR AREAS TRIBUTARY TO PETERS CANYON * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this District has heretofore adopted such requirements; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to conduct an area-wide planning study for the local sewer system to serve the Cowan Heights/Lemon Heights/Crawford Canyon areas. tributary to Peters Canyon to properly plan said local sewer system and the affect on the Districts' Trunk Sewer System; and, t' WHEREAS, the cost of said area-wide study should appropriately be borne by the properties currently outside the District boundaries that will, in all probability, annex to the District and thereby benefit from said study. NOW, IBEREFORE: The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 1 of Resolution No. 75-44-7, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding sub-section (g) as follows: "(g) In addition to all other terms and conditions set forth herein, an area..;wide planning study.fee of $100 per acre shall be paid by the proponents of any application for annexation of territory in the Cowan Heights/Lemon Heights/Crawford Canyon areas tributary to Peters Canyon and generally described as easterly of Newport Boulevard ~- ·\w) . AGE~DA TTFM #9CNN)(2) -DISTRICT 7 "BB-1" ' between Chapman Avenue and Irvine Boulevard." Section 2. That this resolution shall be effective March 9, 1978. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. nBB-2n AGENDA ITEM #9CNN)C2) -DISTRICT 7 nBR-2n A POLICY OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION • OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES * * * * * * * * * * * 3/8/78 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY ESTABLISH THESE PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES: Section I. Selection of.Engineering and Architectural Firms. In the selection of a consulting architect or engineer, it must be realized that no two firms or consultants have equal training·, experience, skill, capabili- ties or work loads to meet the demands of any contemplated project. There are six major areas that will be ·US.ed in the evaluation to select an architect or e.ngineer: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California. C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the .project. D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or ·fields, required by the project~ E. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local firm when more than one firm is bei_ng considered. F. A firm selected where the fees are greater than $10,000 must certify as to an affirmative action program. Section 2. Scope of the Project. -For every project, regardless of the size, approved by the Board(s), and for which outside professional services are required, the staff shall develop a com- prehensive scope of the project. The scope shall define, in detail whenever possible, the extent of the professional ser.vices, the time required, and shall develop a maximum fee ·for the services sought. This scope of work shall be submitted to the Board(s) when requesting authority to solicit proposals. The maximum fee amount \._,) shall not be made public, but will be available to the Board members upon request . : -"-CC-1" . ~GENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "CC-1" "-CC-2" Section 3. Selection of Engineer. A. Projects where services are more than $4,500 but less than $10,000. Projects where the professional fees are more than $4,500 but less than $10,000 are usually specific, small projects· normally requiring specializa- tion in one or two fields of endeavor. Staff shall select that firm which appears best qualified for the project. Negotiations for compensation to. the firm shall be conducted between the consultant, the Districts' Chief Engineer and the Districts' Project Engineer. The recommendation for selection will be submitted to the Board(s) for their approval. The evaluation of the consultant's qualifications and the fee negotiations will not be made public but will be available to any Director upon request. B. Projects where services are greater than $10,000 but less than $100,000. Staff shall select three :or more· known firms that appear to be best qualified for the project. Each firm,-after being thoroughly informed as to the scope of the project and the extent of ·the services required, shall submit to a Selection Committee.the qualifications and records of the firm, the capa- bil.ities to complete the work within the time allotted, the specific key personnel assignable to the project, and other information as may be required to properly evaluate the firm's qualifications. A Selection Committee, comprised of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman of the Boards of Directors or their designee for Joint Works Pro- jects, or the District Chairman or Chairman Pro Tern of the individual Di7trict ~r their.designee in_ the case of a D~strict project, the.DistrictU. Chief Engineer, DirectoI" of Finance and Superintendent, shall review the : qualifications of each consultant, checking with recent clients if necessary to determine the quality of performance. Each firm being considered shall be listed in order of desirability, taking into accow1t location, reputation, experience, financial standing, size, personnel·availability,· quality of references, estimated fee for services to b!: performed, work load and other factors peculiar to the project being considered. To determine the compensation for the services sought, the following will be strictly adherred to: 1. Invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Selection Committee. 2. The engineer shall present,.in writing, to the Selection Committee, a proposal for fees associated with the engineering services. This proposal for compensation shall be presented in sufficient detail in order that the Selection Conunitttee can adequately ascer- tain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the engineer has thoroughly identified the efforts associated with the engineering services and thoroughly understands the work required. 3. The Selection Committee shall review the compensation requested by the consultant which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously \.,.) established. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by the Selection Connnittee and approved by the General Manager as. reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the consultant. AGENDA ·ITEM #12CA) ~ ALL DISTRICTS ".CC-2" "CC-3 4. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the second firm. All such negotiations shall -be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one consultant be dis- cussed with another, or made public. C. Projects where services are greater than $100,000.· The same procedure as outlined for services between $10,000 and $100,000 shall be used except as follows: 1. 2. Adequate public notice shall be given by .the publication of a notice of request for proposals which shall appear in professional journals or publications of general circulation. The extent of the circulation of the publications shall be at least Statewide. The advertisement shall request written proposals for qualifications only. A Screening Committee, which shall also act as the Final Selection Committee, comprised of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Boards, or their designee, the Districts' General Manager, Chief Engineer, Director of Financ~ and Superintendent, shall select at least three firms who appear best qualified.for the particular project. In the case of professional services for the individual District(s), the Chairman and Chairman Pro Tern of that District or their designee shall substitute for the Chairman· and Vice Chairman of the Joint Boards on the Selection Committee. Each firm so selected shall be ranked as to desirability, and negotia- tions shall be similar to those as set forth for projects where fees are between $10,000 and $100,000. Section 4. Continuation of Services. In some cases, where a consulting firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board(s) determine that it might be in the best interest to retain this firm for subsequent phases of work, then the Selection Committee can proceed directly with the negotiations for compensation with this consultant. This would be particularly true when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a master plan report and the services as provided for said report are satisfactory to the Board{s), then the procedure of examining other consultants would not be necessary and the Selection Committee would proceed with _the negotiations for compensation for subsequent phases. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be reached, then the provisions set forth hereinabove would apply. Section 5. Specialized Services. In the event that the District(s) require the specialization of services, where it is known that only one individual or firm can best meet the needs of the District(s), then the Selection Committee, after its determination that only one firm or individual could best meet the needs of a specific case, the Selection Conunittee will report to the Board(s) its findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm or individual. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration. AGENDA ITEM #12(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "CC-3" "CC-4" Section 6. Compensation for Engineering and Architectural Services. When the scope of the project can be well defined and the individual element~ of the engineering cost well defined, a lump sum payment, fixed fee or per diem r~s with a .maximum contract shall be written. The agreement for payment to the consultant on this basis must clearly state the scope and the time limits in which the services must be performed. The agreement should provide for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. Progress payments made to the consultant during the time the services are being supplied shall be on a percentage of the work completed to date, as approved by the Districts' Chief Engineer and recommended to the Board(s) of Directors for payment. When the scope of the project cannot be well defined, such as in the preparation of engineering studies, feasibility reports, master plan reports, etc., the contract shall be on the basis of per diem rates for the various classifications as required, with a maximum amount assigned to the contract. If it is the decision of the Selection Conunittee to use other methods for compen- sation, other than the lump sum or fixed payment, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Selection Conunittee in their reconunendation to the Board (s) of Di.rectors for the consul ting services. Section 7. Term of Selection and Procurement Procedures. This policy shall become effective on March .... 8,:1978, and shall be reviewed per- iodically, as necessary, bu~ no longer than twenty-four months from the effective date, by the Executive Conunittee of the Board(s) of Directors. These procedures may be modified from time to time as necessary·to best meet the needs of the · District(s). 1...-1 AGENDA ITEM #12(A)-ALL DISTRICTS "Cf.-4" . ., '" COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STEPHEN J. KOONCE VCTING COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF COUNTY ENGINEER LOS CERRITOS REGION ORVILLE E. McCOLLOM REGIONAL ENGINECR 10023 SOUTH DELLFLOWER DOULEVARD BELLFLOWER, CALIFORNIA 90706 8CSG·7011 January 26, 1978 Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager Orange Cotmty Sanitation Districts Dear Mr. Harper: SEWAGE CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS LA HABRA HEIGHTS AREA LOS ANGELES COUNTY Since our letter to you dated April 26, 1976 and subsequent discussions with your staff and with the City of La Habra, we have commenced with and completed a capacity study of appropri- ate sections of the City's sanitary sewer system. A copy of \.,,J · this study is encJ.osed :for your review •. Upon completion of this study, the City reviewed our recommendations and made any changes they deemed necessary. A means of determining the most equitable method of allocating the cost necessary to reconstruct various sections of the City's sewer system was then presented to the City Engineer for his review. He concurred with our method and presented this method to the La Habra City Council for their approval. As indicated in the enclosed letter of January 17, 1978, final approval by the City Council is contingent upon approval by your agency to allow Los Angeles County to utilize your facilities with the quantity of flow indicated in the letter of April 26, 1976. Therefore, we are requesting that this matter be presented to your Board of Directors for their consideration. Mr. McCollom will be "DD-1" AGENDA ITEM. #12(c) Cl) -ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1" Mr. Fred Harper January 26, 1978 Page 2 happy to discuss this matter with you, and will be available to attend your Board meeting to present our proposal and to answer any questions that they may have. Yours very truly, . Stephen J. Koonce ACTING COUNTY ENGINEER Orville E. Mccollom Regional Engineer OEM:RDS:llg R-1 Encs. cc: "DD-2" Report Letter Mr. R. Lewis (Orange County San. Districts) Mr. L. Risner (City Manager, La Habra) _ AGENDA JlrM #1/(c)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2" '· RESOLtrrION NO. 78-49 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES FOR DISTRICTS' REPRESENTATIVE ON SCAG 208 PROGRAM COMMITTEE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 1HE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,· CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES FOR DISTRICTS' APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE ON SCAG 208 PROGRAM COMMITTEE * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have previously acted to appoint a representative to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 208 Program Committee through December 31, 1978;· and, WHEREAS, said appointee will soon retire as a Director of the Co\Dlty Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is in the best interest of the Cowity Sanitation Districts that said appointee continue to represent these ·.Districts tmtil the completion of the present SCAG 208 Program Connnittee assignment to provide a continuity of effort; and, WHEREAS, it is deemed appropriate that.said appointee continue to be com- pensated by the Districts for said SCAG 208 Program Committee work followi~g retirement from the Boards of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY R.ESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tilat the Districts' appointed representative attending a SCAG 208 Program Committee meeting, conference, hearing or other ftmction on behalf of the Districts, when designated by the Joint Chairman or General Manager, shall ·~ be entitled to receive the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day, but in no event shall the representatives' total compensation exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month. ~'EE-1" AGENDA ITEM ftl.2(n) (2) -All. DISTRJCTS "EE-1" .. - ; ' I J Section 2.. When traveling on such business, said representative shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the course of said travel in accordance with the following schedule: Commercial Transportation -per actual invoice Hotel -room rate per actual statement for occupancy . Registration -actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee Ground Transportation -as itemized Personal Vehicle -First 1-150 miles per month @ $.15/mile -Next 151-600 miles per month.@ $.12/mile -Next 601+ miles per month @ $.06/mile Telephone Service -as itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals -Actual cost of the representative 1 s· personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting. · Section 3. 'Ibat the authorization provided for by this resolution shall V expire on December 31, 1978, or when said appointee resigns said appointment, whichever occurs first. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 8, 1978. "EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(n)C2) -ALL DISTRICTS "EE-2" MEETING DATE M::irch 8 1 978 TIME DIST 1 1 . . SALTA ELLI) ...... SHARP ....... v RI L~Y)~ •. .' ••••••.• ANTHONY •••• ~ -- ORTtz) ............ EVANs ................. -- BRIGGS) ........... RIMA ........ V" = = DISTRICT 2 GROOT ••••••••••. WEDAA • • • • • • .....- HOYT) ............ SMITH ...... ~ -- RILEY) ............ ttAr<K ...... ~ = = GAEDE)• ........... FOX ......... ~ __ DE JESUS) ••••••• HOLT ••••••• ~ __ EVANS) ••••••••• -~· •••• ·-v"":-_ CULVER) ••••••••• PERRY ••• · ••• ...J:::::::: -- STEVENS) •••••••• ROGET •••••• --.!:::'.:'." -- THOM) ••••••••••• ROTH. • • • • • • ......--- ST ANTON) •••••••• SCOTT •••••• .....!::::::' -- TIPTON) ••••••••• WINN •••••• -~-- WINTERS) •••••••• .we-eft ••••••• ~-- DISTRICT 3 STANTON .......... SVALSTAD ... V __ LACA YO) ••••••••••• HUDSON. . • • • • v"' GAEDE) ............ COO PER ..••• V -- PERRY) ............. CULVER ..... v= = PRIEST) ••••••••• ~ •••••• V BLACKMAN) ••••••• GRAY ••••••• ~== JARRELL) •••••••• GRIFFIN •••• _.i...::::: WE I SHAU PT) •••••• MARS H OTT... V"" -- FINLAYSON) •••••• OL SO N •••••• V -. - EVANS) •••••••••• ~TIZ •••••• .........--- THOM)~· ••••••.•••• ROTH ....... v = = RILEY ............ SCHMIT ..... ~ __ YOUNG ............ STEVENS.···~ BROWNL ........... SYLVIA : ...• -¥ = = PATTINSON) ..... · •. WIEDER .... ~ WOOD) ............. WINTERS .... 2= = DISTRICT 5 (DOSTAU ........... MC INNIS ... ~ (ANTHONY) .•.••••••• RILEY ••••••• ~ = = (WILLI AMS) ......... DOSTAL ..... ·~-_ DISTRIC U BRIGGS ........... RIMA ........ ..........- DOSTA[._ ........... RYCKOFF .... ..........--- RILEY) ............ ANTHONY .... .,._.-= = DISTRICLZ DOST Ar ........... BARRETT .... ,/" GAIDO ..... : ••.••• VARDO ULI S .• .........-= = RILEY •••••.•••.•• ~ ······...i.L ORTIZ) ........... EVAN S ....... _£-- (HUTCH I NS.D.Nl ••••••• GLOC KNER... ~ - (SHAR p) ....... : .... SALTARELLI .............. -- (HOYT). ••••••••••••• SMITH •.••••• _L'. = DISTRICUl G !BBS .PATTI N90P4 ...,........ __ PATTIN SO°N'J:::::::sHE NKMAN .::.fL_ __ RILEY) ............ SCHMIT ...... ~ __ (LA \'/ ENCE)····· .. ·EDWA RDS ... • B (CLARK • • • • .. • • • • • . I LEY ....... __ _ 1/16/7 8 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2 1 3 ,5,6,7 & 11 JOINT BMROS. rR I LEY)· .. •· ..•• ANTHONY..... V' DOSTAL) ........ BARRETT .................. = GAEDE} : : : : : : : : : COOPER.:::::: -1L'"" = PERRY) ......... CULVER ...... -lL" ~ WI LLI~MS) .....• DOSTAL ••••.. ....J.L"-_ ~ Olo\q ~D'l~ ORTIZ ......•• EVANS ....•••• ~ - GAEDE) ••.•••..•• FOX ...••.•.•• ~ _ PRIEST) ....... lft~E&E ........ ....L - WARREN) ••••••• GLOCKNER.... v BLACKMAN) ••••• GRAY •••••••• "CC - JARRELL) •••••• GRIFFIN ••••• ~ - DE JESUS) ••••• HOLT ••.•••• -~- LACA YO) ••••••• HUD SON •••••• ~= (WEI SHAUPT) •••• MARS HOT T •••• ........- (DOSTAL) ••••••• MC INNI S •••• v- ~FINLAY:?~::·::gLSON::::::: t/'= f GIBBS .••.•..• .,.,?ATTHISOH-: .. ~ - CULVER) •••.•.•. PERRY ........ ~ -· ANTHONY). ...... RI LEY ••••• ; •• -1.L - BRIGGS) ........ RIMA ........ -C:: - S'J°EVENS) ••••••• ROGET ..•.••.• ~ - THOM) ...•.•••.. ROTH ...••.•.• ...loC - DOST A[._) ........ RYCKOFF ..... ~ - SHARP) ......... SALTARELLI. • .......-- RILEY) ......... SCHMIT ....... v-- STANTON) ••..••• SCOTT ...•..•. ~ -~tA:~ ~ SALTARELLI) ••.• SHARP ..•.•.•• ..........--='~fC\"-c./o 7SC/ PATTINSON) ....• SHENKMAN •.•. ~ - HOYT) ........... SMITH ....... \;7"- YOUNG) .••••.•••. STEVENS ..•.• ~ -- STANTON) .•••.•• SVALSTAD ..•• _L - BROWN) .......... SY LVI A ...... ~ GAIDO) •••.•.•..• VARD OU LIS ..• V'- GROOT) ..•. )' .... WEDAA ........ \?'" -. PATTINSON ..... WIEDER ....... a_. - TIPTONL ....... WINN ......... ..,-- WOOD).. .. .... WINTERS ..... V - OTHERS s . . .. . . -;;;;;:r - HARPER ..•..•• __ ·_ SYLVESTER ••• __ LEWIS ........ __ CLARKE ....... __ BROWN •••••••• __ WOODRUFF. •••• __ HOHENER ..... __ HOWARD ••..••. __ HUNT ......... __ KEITH ........ __ KENNEY •••.•.. __ LYNCH ........ __ MADDO X ....... __ MARTINSON ••. __ PIERSALL •.•• __ STEVEN S ..••.• __ TRA VERS .•.••• MEET ING DA TE Morch 8 197 8 TI ME DISTR.lil_l SALT AR ELLI) ...... SHARP....... V RILEY) ••..••••.••• ANTHONY ...• 1/·= = ORTIZ) •..••.•..••. EVANS ...•..• L BRIGGS) •••••...••. RIMA ........ ..JL = = DIST RICT 2 GROOT ••.••...••. WE DAA •.••.. L HOYT) .••••..••.•• SMITH •••... L -- RILEY) .•••••.••••. G-L~ •.•.•. ~ = = GAEDE) ••••........ Fox ....••.•. ~ -- DE J ESUS) ••••••• HOL T ••••••• .J.L:: -- EVANS) •••••.•••• -e-frT-tZ. •••••• ~ -- ) . / CUL VER ••••••••• PERRY •••••• ·~ - STEVENS) •••••••• ROGET •••••• -1.--- THO M) ••••••••••• ROTH •••.••• ~ - STA NTON) •••.•.•• SCOTT ...... -- TIPTON) ••••••••• WINN ••••••• ~-- WINTE RS) •••.•••• WGG.D.. •••••• _ -- DIST RICT 3 STANTON .•••...... SVALSTAD· .• \/"'" __ LACAYO) •.••••••••. HUD SON ..•••. i/ GAEDE).··· .. ···••• COOPER .. · .. '?'-= PERRY) .••• · ...•... CULVER .·.·. PRIEST).~ ••••••• fRE !!E •••••• v -- BLACK MAN) ••••••• GRAY ••••••• (JJ -- JARR EL L ) •••••••• GRIFFIN •••• ~ = WE I SHAUP T ) •.•••• MARSHOTT ••• FI NLAYSON) •••••• OLSON •••••• ~__-_ = EVANS) •••••••••• ~ ••••• 1:7' TH OM)~-•••..•••••• R.CLD:l ••••••• V°-- RILEY ............ SCHMIT ..... IZ~ = YOUNG ••••....•••. STEVE NS ... ·~ BROl'IN) •.•....••••• SY LVI A..... -- PATTINSON) ....... WIEDER .... °t/'.< - (W OOD) •••••••.•.••• WINTERS ..•• -_= ~ISTRICf 5 DO ST AL .•....•..•. MC IN NIS ..• JL (ANTH ONY) .•...•.••. RILEY .....•• 1/-- (WILLI AMS) ......... DOSTAL .•.•.. ,/ = = DISTRI CT 6 · BRIGGS •..••••••.• R I MA ........ ,/' DOST Al-.•••..••... RYCKOFF .... I/ -- RILEY) •••••.•••..• AN TH ONY •••• v = = DISTRICT 7 DOST A~ ••••.•.•••. BARR ETT .... V GA IDO ............ VARDOULI S •. 57 = = RI LE Y .••••......• G~AlZK ..... . ORTI z) ........... EVANS .....•. ::JZ = = !HUTCH I NSOblJ .••.••. GLOC KNER ..• __ I--""/ SHARP) •.•...•..... SALTARE LLI .~--- HOYT). ••..••.•••••• SM ITH ••..••• _t/_ = = DI STRIC T 11 (GI BBS) PAT1INSON ~ ~PATTI~so·~n:::::::sHENKMAN .:: ;// = RI LEY •••...••.... SCHMIT...... __ DI STRICT 8 lLAl'/RENCE) ········E D~·· _ ( BR~~e .•.. ~ CL ARK)-:-••..•.•••• ,RILEY ...••.. __ = 1/16/78 7:30 p.m. DI STRICTS l.~,5 .~,b,/ ~ 11 Jfilfil___B_MRDS "fRILEY J • ........ AN THONY..... ....- (D OS T AL) •....•.• BARRETT .••.• -I:::::'= RI LEY) ......... CLA RK .. • . • • • <./' -· _ GAEDE) ......... COOPER •••.•. ~ PERRY) .•.••.••. CULVER ...... --11 WILLIA)MS ) ...... DOSTA L ...... t?·-"l.C' (cl ({ ~ ORTIZ ........ EVANS........ -l/o?sq GAEDE) ...•..•... FOX ...•...••• fAL'_ PRIEST) ........ FRESE ........ ~- WARREN) •••.••• GLOCKNER •••• L/ BLACKMAN) ••••• GRAY •••••••• ()1.../ - JARRELL) •••••• GRIFFJN ••••• 1.//- DE JESUS) ••••• HOLT •••••••• V - LACAYO) •••.••• HUDSON •••.•• 1:/7' - (WEISHAUPT) •••• MARSHOT T •••• ~ (DOST AL) ••••••• Mc INNIS •••• 17""- (FJNLAYSON ) •••• OLS ON ••••••• ~ (E¥A-N-S) •••••••• Q-RT-t! •• ····~ -- 1 G I B,B S ) • • • • • • • • • f'>*'l"ftttstm'. . . ;-_;;7 - C UL VER) ......•. PERRY ........ ;::/'= · ANTHONY) .•..... ,R.LbE-4-.... : .. ~ !BRIGGS) .....••. RI MA ..•..•.• _J.L.- s ·1·EVENS) .•...•• ROGET •...•.•• =z= THOM) •....•.•.• ROTH......... ~ _,L.._ DOST Al-) .....•.. RYCK:::lFF •.... -//.,- SHARP) ......... SALTARELLI •. ~-.m_ lRILE Y) •.•....•. SCHMIT •..•.•. --~ S TA NTON) •.....• SCOTT .•.••.•. __ -p-o./Y;, SA LT ARE LLIL •• SHARP ....•... L ~ -· fLA.*ttl-S 9i~) ..... .SH EN KMJl.i4 .... _.tJ.d. - YOU NG .......... STEVENS ••.•. ;?-!HOYT )) ..••...•.. SMITH ....•.. t/ - STANTON) ......• SVALSTAD.... ~1 BROWNL •..•.••. SYLVIA ...•.. - GAIDO) .......... VARDOULIS ... ";/"- GROOT) .... )" .... WEDAA .•...•.• i/= PATTIN SON ..... WIEDER .•.••.• tr/ TIPTON) .••....•. WINN .....•••. (.?"- WOOD) ........... WIN TE RS ..... ·)/- WINTERS). •••.•.. WOOD .....•••• ..1J!..L = OT HERS HARPER .•..••• __ ·_ SYLV ES TER .•• __ LE WI S .•.••.•• __ CLA RKE. •.••.• __ BROWN ••••••.• __ WOODRUFF .•... __ HOHENER ..•.. __ HO\'/ARD •.••... __ HUNT •.•..•... __ KEITH ..••.•.. __ KEN NEY ....... __ LY NCH .••....• __ . MADDOX ....... __ MARTIN SON .•. __ Pl ERSA LL ..•• STEVEN S ....•. -- TRAVERS ..... . -- 3-8-78 .. . REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HEARING ON MODIFICATIONS TO SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS HELD IN SAN FRANCISCO FEBRUARY 22ND (S[E ATTACHED), COPIES OF THE JOINT .. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT HAVE ALSO BEEN PLACED IN THE DIRECTORS' FOLDERS. CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P,M, . . . . . ~EDNESDAY, MARCH 29J 1978. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS: RUSSELL GRAY <DONALD HoL T j FRANK MARSHOTT ANNOUNCE THAT DIRECTORS GEORGE SCOTTJ HARRIETT WIEDERJ DON WINN AND FRANCES Woon WILL NOT BE RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION. SUGGEST THAT RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION BE ADOPTED EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THEIR SERVICES.. T4_.,_ ~ ~ o~ ~~1 l>--t-.._. -.A;;~ MARCH 8 1 1978 JOINT MTG. f'-a) Report of the Joint Chairman Saltarelli reported that he went to EPA Hearing on Modifications to secondary treatment requirements held in San Francisco on February 22nd. Referred to copies of the statement he made which were in Directors' folders . Said he also threw in a few remarks that elected officials have to face the taxpayers these days. Said he felt rather confident that if we can make the standards for application for waiver, our request should be looked at as favorably or more favorably than other Districts that apply. Called an Executive Connnittee meeting for March 29th and invited Directors Holt and Vardoulis to attend. Mentioned that several Directors will be retiring. Suggested that staff prepare resolutions of connnendation. Saltarelli so moved that this be done. Motion seconded. Voice vote and motion carried. DO RESOLUTIONS for George Scott, Harriett Wieder, Don Winn, Frances Wood, Charles Stevens, etc. (7-b) Report of the General Manager FAH commented re supplemental agenda items. Noted that item 9(a) had been striken when we mailed agenda. Item on supplemental agenda recommends that these bids be rejected and we go out for bidding a second time. Re item 14(b) are asking for authority to negotiate purchase order for printing of some additional plans for Major Facilities for contractor's personnel which exceeds our $4500 authority. Said one item on agenda is rather unusual which is request to finance travel for Director of SCCWRP for Seminar next month. SCCWRP budget is so tight that they were concerned when we asked him to go to Washington so we are reconnnending this Board authorize reimbursement as it is pretty critical right now with this ocean outfall. Also on supplemental is a recommendation for approval of Addendum and awarding the contract for Orangethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer. Had nine bids. Came in $161,000 under engineer's estimate. Very fortunate and have a good contractor. (7-c) Report of the General Counsel TLW said he had a couple of comments regarding agenda items. On consent calendar is a request to receive and file matter of litigation re Skipper & Company. Said that matter has been resolved to our satisfaction as of yesterday afternoon. Skipper & Company has retained counsel to represent the interests of the District so we will not incur any legal liability or responsibility . Second item of litigation re Bragg Crane and Rigging Co. Said this outfit rented some equipment at Plant No. 2. They say because Earp went broke, we should have bonded Earp. In talking to attorney today, said we should just keep this open, so we don't have to ge t involved too actively. Advised that one of the creditors will move in and take equipment away. Seems to be a desire to see if some effort can't be made to test this unit . If successful, maybe somebody will buy it. No further action is requested of the Board. TLW then added that we approved a contract several months ago with John Carollo Engineers re instructional program & start-up re Pl-16. Contract written with completion date of February S and due to late start, request extension from February 5 to June 30, 1978, with no additional fee. It was so moved. Motion seconded. Voice vote. Motion carried to approve Addendum No. 1 to contract. (12a) Revised Procedures for Selection of Prof. Engrg. & Arch. Services (12e) (2) (19b) Re item 6 in procedure, Mcinnis questioned wording because of problem caused with 3 members only. Could be in violation of Brown Act. Should amend wording to .read, "for Districts of four or more members." Procedures approved as modified. Engaging consulting firm re info for application of waiver of sec. trtmt. Director asked if staff had any idea who it might be. FAH answered that we will work with SCCWRP and probably John Carollo Engineers. Will come back to Board later with ·111ore information. Don't know how much will be needed. Will probably have to have several consultants. DISTRICT 3 Olson reported that there was going to be a special seminar on hazardous waste in late March sponsored by the Department of Transportation. Encouraged one or two representatives to attend that conference at the Airporter Hotel in Los Angeles. Cost is $30 per person. Said regula- tions are becoming very stiff. Would like Board to approve sending representatives. Olson moved that based on General Manager's recommenda- tion, we allow at least two representatives to attend this seminar. Motion seconded. Voice vote. Motion carried. (19c) DISTRICT 3 Director Cooper of Brea reported that they had had trouble with their sewer lines because of rains. Read letter from Milo Keith to Ray Lewis. Thanked Ray for allowing their City to purchase 15" plugs which were a lifesaver. (19d) DISTRICT 3 Director Olson referred to report and letter from the Di s tricts re facilities to service Midway City Sanitary District's area. Thanked the staff for their time and help. (27) DISTRICT 7 -OPA TLW advised that they hadn't paid their bill yet. Won't even an s wer his calls or letters. George Rach no longer president of OPA Association but he was assuming responsibility. Owe $5,062. Said he pointed out in letters to OPA that Directors have expressed concern and have deemed litigation justified and proper. Question asked regarding our chances of collecting under litigation. Smith advised that the City of Orang e has litigation against them by OPA in the amount of $300,000. They hooked up to City without telling them and it blew their lines becaus e City had more pressure in pipes. Said he would like to just wait and see what happens in answer to TLW's letter. Said his personal feeling was that he didn't think we would be able to sue. -2- Saltarelli added we would have to spend more time and money to go after them. Could let them know we will not accept any annexation requests in the future unless all past debts are paid. Tom said we could take a licking on some of the money and file for part of it in small claims . Said he would bring report back to the Board at the next Board Meeting and see if they have answered letter yet. -3- I . i -; ITEM (9b) -Award of Contract No. PW-063 Bids were received on February 23rd for new Fiberglass Ventil- ation System at the Grit Chambers and Bar Screen Areas at the Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2. Seven bids were received which ranged from a low of $37,600 to a maximum of $64,657. Plans for this improvement were prepared by staff with an engineer's estimate of $34,000. Although the low bid is 11% over the engineer's estimate, the low bid, submitted by Hickman Bros., Inc. of Los Angeles, in the staff's opinion, is the lowest and most responsible bid received for the work as specified. Staff, therefore, recommends award of the contract for work to Hickman Bros., Inc. of Los Angeles in the amount of $37,600. ITEM (9c) -Approval of Plans and Specifications Job PW-064A This project is for furnishing and installation of one Plant air compressor with concrete skid and all associated appurten- ances. This item was included in the 1977-78 fiscal year budget (budget amount $80,000) which will add additional air supplies to the deficit system at Plant No. 2. Bids will be received on March.30th. Engineer's estimate for this project is $40,000. ; i ITEM (9-d) -Approval of Plans and Specifications Job PW-065 This project is for the removal of a portion .of the existing grit hopper assembly and the fabrication and installation of a modified grit assembly to replace the deteriorated portions at Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2. Plans and specifications for this project were prepared by staff with an engineer's estimate of $20,000. Bids will be received and opened on March 30, 1978. ITEM (9-e) -Addendum No. 1 to Job No. J-7-3B This Addendum No. 1 to the Replacement of Air Conditioning for the Administration and Engineering.Building clarifies certain technical requirements which were brought to the staff's attention during the bidding period. The Addendum clarifies the contractor's obligations as to roof openings, removal and replacement of acoustical tile and the furnishing and installation of line voltage conduit and wiring. Staff recommends approval of this Addendum No. 1 to the bid docu- ments. ITEM (9-f) -Receipt of Bids for Job No . J -7-3B Two bids were received on February 23rd for the installation of the air conditioning system for the Administration/Engineering Building. The two bids submitted were $73,800 and $79,850 compared to the engineer's estimate of $60,000. Since only two bids were received for this work, the staff is recommending that the bids be rejected and that the general manager be authorized to negotiate a contract for the work as specified in an amount not to exceed $68 ,000 . It is the staff's opinion that the two bids received may not reflect a competitive price for the work to be done when comparing the job market for this type of work. ITEM (9-i) -Change Order No. 1 Job PW-055-1 The plans and specifications for this contract for the In- stallation of Odor Control Facilities at the Metering and Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1 were prepared by staff. It was discovered during the installation that additional piping was required to make caustic solution delivery more manageable and, therefore the staff is reconunending this change order in the amount of $306.18. to add the additional piping to the fill pipe on the caustic tank in order that the correct elevation for caustic delivery can be maintained. ITEM (9-g) -Approve plans and specifications Job No. J-13-2 Plans and specifications for the Additions to the Warehouse were prepared by the outside.consulting architectural firm of Miyake, Leece, Wood & Associates. This project will add approximately 2,200 square feet to the existing warehouse to accommodate additional warehouse and purchasing personnel. The architects estimate for this project is $125,000. This project was included in the 1977-78 budget in the amount of $150,000. Bids will be received and opened on April 27, 1978. ITEM (9-h) -Approving plans and specifications P2-15-1A In June of last year, the Board authorized staff to negotiate for the purchase of a new sludge centrifuge to accommodate the dewatering of additional sludge volumes. The auth9rization for the purchase of the sludge centrifuge was not to exceed $245,000 which included the centrifuge, motor and starter plus tax and freight. The staff successfully negotiated a contract for the purchase of a centrifuge for approximately $211,000 exclusive of .the necessary motor and starte~. This project is for the purchase of the necessary motor to power the centrifuge. It was determined it was more economical to purchase the motor exclusive of the centrifuge thereby avoiding the Bird Machinery Company (centrifuge manufacturer) makr-up on a buy-out item. Engineer's estimate for this equipment purchase is $15,000. Bids are scheduled to be received and opened on March 30th. ITEM (9-k) -Authorizing Sale of Scrap Metal and Surplus Materials In accordance with the Districts' current purchasing resolution, we are asking for authority to receive bids and to award the sale of scrap metal and surplus materials. These materials are accumulated and are sold to the highest bidder when a substantial amount is collected. It is estimated that the sale of this material will result in bids of approximately $3,000. ITEM (9-n) -Purchase of Main Sewage Pump Shaft for Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2 Recently one of the main raw sewage pump shafts failed which makes the pump inoperative to accommodate incoming flows to Plant No. 2. Staff is requesting authorization for the general manager to issue a purchase order for the replacement of this shaft in an amount not to exceed $20,000 plus tax and freight. This authorization is requested because of the necessity to repair this pump as soon as possible. ITEM (9-n) Out of State Travel and Expenses in Connection with Job No. P2-23 The Major Facilities, along with the Oxygen Generation and Dissolution Equipment for the 75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 are two contracts which have been awarded in excess of $38 million. Much of the major equipment to be supplied will be manufactured out of the State of California requiring on-site inspection by the Districts' engineers and inspection personnel. The Oxygen Generation and Dissolution Equipment will be manufactured in Allentown, PA and some of the other major equipment that is scheduled to be furnished by the contractors will be manufactured in the eastern part of the United States. The item appearing on the agenda is to authorize the out of state travel for Districts' personnel in connection with the inspection of this major equipment in an amount not to exceed $25,000. Included in this authoriz- ation is the ratification of the superintendent and an associate engineer's recent trip to Chicago (February 21 and 22) for a construction conference relative to the Oxygen Generation and Dissolution Equipment. ITEM (9-o) -Testing Laboratory Services for Job No. P2-23 Pursuant to the Boards' authorization, staff ·solicited and received responses from five soils testing and materials testing laboratories to perform the necessary testing services required during the construction of 75-mgd of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2. Of the five firms submitting proposals in response to the Districts' request, Southern California Soils and Testing Laboratories, Inc. and Twining Laboratories submitted the lowest schedule of fees. It is, therefore, recommended that the soils and concrete testing be awarded to Southern California Soils and Testing, Inc. of Irvine, for the fee stipulated in their letter for a maximum amount not to exceed $45,000 and that for the materials evaluation, award be made to Twining Laboratories pursuant to their submittal in a maximum not to exceed $25,000. This work will be performed over a three year period and is grant fundable under the provisions of the construction grant. \_./ ITEMS (9p & q) -Change Order No. 5 to Job No. P2-23-l and Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P2-23-5 Two of the five contracts for the 75-mgd of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 have been awarded to the same contractor, Pasqual & Ludwig, Inc. There are certain items of work to be completed under Contract No. P2-23·-1 (Flood Wall & Site Improvements) which cannot be completed until subsequent work is finished on Contract·No. P2-23-5 (Operations Center). It is, therefore, recommended· that the work to be performed under Contract No. P2-23-l be deleted and the same work be added to Contract No. P2-23-5. This will aid in finalizing Contract No. P2-23-l within the next sixty days whereby Contract No. P2-23-5 is not scheduled for completion until mid-summer. These change orders have been tentatively approved by the State Water Resources Control Board. Staff recommends approval of these change orders. .· ITEM (9-v) -Authorization to Solicit Proposals for Engineering Services for the Design of Solids Handling Facilities for 75-mgd of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 The Districts are in receipt of a grant offer to design additional digestion and solids dewatering facilities to process the increased solids from the secondary treatment facilities presently under construction at Plant No. 2. The estimated eligible project cost for these facilities is $12.62 million. Solids dewatering facilities were not in- eluded in the original contract pending completion of the JPL ACTS evaluation report. ·Although th~ activated carbon treatment system offers certain advantages, it is felt that it has not been developed sufficiently to meet the time schedules necessary to accommodate the solids when the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 are complete and operational. It is requested that staff be authorized to solicit proposals pursuant to the Boards' policy for selection of engineering services and that the responses be submitted to the Selection Committee for recommendation to the Boards for approval of an engineering contract. It is anticipated that the Selection Committee would make a recommendation to the Boards of Directors at the May Board Meeting. .· """-'' ITEM (9-x) -Prevailing Wage Rates for Public Works Contracts Included with your agenda material is the standard annual resolution establishing the prevailing wage rates to be paid to all classifications of workmen employed on public works contracts on Districts' projects. Adoption of this resolution authorizes the secretary to publish resolution and incorporate. these wage rates in all Districts' contracts. ITEM (9-y) -Initiating Proceedings Annexation No. 30 -District 2 This proposed annexation contains 9.893 acres on Country Hill Road near Mohler Drive in the Santa Ana Canyon area of the City of Anaheim. The applicant has paid all necessary fees and staff recommends adoption· of Resolution No. 78-39-2 authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex this proposed residential development. .· . ""-1f '' ITEM (9-aa) -Change Order No. 1 -Contract No. 3-20-3 The pipe supplier to the general contractor has submitted a request 't::o substitute 45" RCP in lieu of the specified 42" RCP size. This substitution affects the extension of the Knott Interceptor northerly of Orangethorpe as well as the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer between Knott and Western. Staff recommends approval of this change.order at no additional cost to the District • ITEM (9bb) -Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-20-3 Subsequent to the award of this contract, the design engineer was authorized.to prepare the plans and specifications for. the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer. To avoid underground utility conflicts as well as traffic requirements during construction it is necessary to realign the interconnections between the Knott Interceptor and the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer. This change order adjusts the engineer's quantities by deleting 14 lineal feet of 42" RCP and the reduction of traffic island medians requested by the City of Buena Park. Staff recommends approval of this change order in a total reduction amount of $4,949. ITEM (9-cc) -Change Order No. 2 -Contract No. 3-lR-3 This contract for the plastic lining repair of manholes located on the Miller-Holder Trunk sewer requires that the contractor clean and replace all existing manhole frames and covers. During construction it was discovered that one particular area was subject to odor problems which were creating a local nuisance problem. To abate this situation staff is recommending the replacement of the existing manhole be a· pressure type of manhole to control the odors in this area for an additional cost to the contract of $544.50. ·. ITEM (9-dd) -Addendum No. 1 -Contract No. 3-22-1 This addendum revises the plans for this contract for which bids are scheduled to be received on March 7th. It substitutes a 39" VCP stub for the originally planned 36" VCP stub at the junction structure at Western Avenue. This increased size is necessary to accommodate future extension of the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer. ITEM (9-gg) -Initial Study for Second Barrel of Siphon at Santa Ana River Crossing Pursuant to the Board's authorization at the February meeting, the staff hasprepared an initial study to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the construction of a 33" siphon across the Santa Ana River bed northerly of Pacific Coast Highway. It is contemplated that the work would be done in the f·all of this year to coincide with the Flood Control District's contract for the widening.and improvements of the Santa Ana River. Pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act, staff is requesting authority to prepare a negative declaration for this project and that said declaration be noticed as required. This action is necessary prior to submittal of an application for a Coastal Commission permit. ITEM (9-ii) -Initiation of Proceedings -Annexation No. 74 At the November, 1977 Board Meeting, the District received and filed the request for annexation of·2.27 acres in the unincor- porated territory of the County in the vicinity of the southerly corner of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive. This matter was referred to staff for study and recommendation. The staff has reviewed the application and feels that the proposed development conforms with the District's Master Plan of development and reconunends the adoption of Resolution No. 78-45-7 initiating the annexation proceedings. This parcel must be annexed to.the 70th Sewer Maintenance District since the wastewater must be pumped to the District's gravitY- trunk sewers. ITEM (9-jj) -INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS -ANNEXATION NO. 75 At the December Board Meeting the Directors received a request from a property owner to annex 4.101 acres of territory in the City of Orange located in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Ranchwood Trail. Staff has reviewed the proposed develop- · ment and the applicant has paid all necessary fees. Staff, therefore, reconunends adoption of Resolution No. 78-46-7 author- izing initiation of proceedings. ... ITEM (9-kk) -Ordering Annexation No. 64 During the installation of a portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer from the intersection of Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street to the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista Street (Job No. 7-6-9) in the spring of 1976, the District acquired a sewer easement from the property owner owning the parcel of land located at the southeasterly corner of Hewes Street and Villa Park.Road. As a condition of the granting of the sewer easement, the property owner requested annexation to the Sanitation District. The legal description and the necessary documentation has been approved and LAFC has adopted a resolution authorizing completion of annexation proceedings.· Staff, therefore, recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-47-7 ordering the annexation of 1.859 acres of territory to the Dis.trict. ITEM (9-11) -Ordering Annexation No. 67 At the November, 1977 Board Meeting, the Dire~tors initiated proceedings for the annexation of 3.397 acres located in the vicinity of Ladera Senda and Sirrine Drive in the Cowan Heights area. This matter was subsequently forwarded to LAFC which has approved the parcel for annexation. Staff, therefore, reconunends approval of Resolution No. 78-48-7 ordering annexation of this parcel to the District. The parcel will be served by the 7th Sewer Maintenance District. ITEM (9-nn) -Areawide Drainage Study for Peters Canyon Drainage Area At the November, °1977 Board Meeting, the staff made a verbal report relative to the future annexations to the District on those properties located on the backside of Cowan Heights, Lemon Heights and Crawford Canyon areas. These properties drain naturally toward the Peters Canyon area. For a consid- erable number of years, the .District has been accepting small area annexations which entail construction.of small pumping stations which ·have been incorporated in·and made the respon- sibility of the 70th Sewer Maintenance District. It is becoming more difficult with increased building activity in this area to properly plan for the local sewer system and the affects on the District's trunk sewer system. Staff has searcheq diligently throughout the County for an existing topographic map to aid in a planning study for this area. There is no existing mappi~g known to the staff that covers the subject drain~ge area and, therefore, the staff is requesting that an aerial top~graphic map be made by an outside consulting firm for an amount not to exceed $10,000 to aid staff in this planning study. It is also recommended that since there is approximately 100 or 150 acres of territory which could be annexed to the District, that this aerial mapping charge be paid for by future petitioners for annexation. · Staff is recommending that an additional $100 per acre be included in the processing fee to all applicants in this drain- age area to offset the cost for this drain~ge study. \iwl' .. \. ITEM 19 -Award of Contract No. 3-21-1 Orangethorpe Relief Sewer At the February Board, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for this portion of the Orangethorpe Relief Sewer extending from the Knott Interceptor Sewer to Western Avenue in the City of Buena Park. Bids are scheduled to be received on Tuesday, March 7th and the results will be reported to the Board on the supplemental agenda. Staff expects very competitive bids on this project inasmuch as more than fifteen prospective bidders have picked up plans and specifications and bidding documents. Engineer's estimate for this project is $702,150.