Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-12-16 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o r AREA CO TE A CODE 7DN 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 962-2 2-2411 w�� P. ❑. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 1❑B44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY December 10, 1976 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 7 THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1976 - 8: 00 P.M. FIRE STATION N0, 23 5020 SANTIAGO BOULEVARD VILLA PARK, CALIFORNIA Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of December 8, 1976, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. *14 Secr ary JWS:rb t5VAKLJb VF 1116+ LUVKb County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 DISTRICT No. 7 540-2410 I� AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED CONCURRENT ANNEXATION AND BOND AUTHORIZATION - ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA TIME: 8: 00 P.M. , THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1976 PLACE: FIRE STATION N0 , 2D 5020 SANTIAGO BOULEVARD VILLA PARK (SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE) (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Public Hearing re Proposed Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings - Orange Park Acres Annexation No. 51 (a) Open hearing (b) Summary of resolution making determination (c) Summary of proceedings to date by District's Chairman (d) Review of engineering requirements to provide sanitary sewers for Orange Park Acres area by District's Engineer (e) Review of proposal by District's Bond Counsel (f) Review of Board actions to date by District's Secretary (g) Consideration of written protests, if any (h) Consideration of oral protests, if any (i) If a majority protest is not deemed to exist, then hearing may be closed and Board may proceed to consider adoption of Resolution No. ,. -,9 a resolution of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, making determinations, ordering annexation of territory subject to confirmation of voters, establishing terms and conditions of annexation, describing exterior boundaries of territory annexed, and calling special improvement district bond election; OR If a majority protest is deemed to exist, then hearing should be continued to to determine the sufficiency of the protests. (4) Other business and communications (5), Consideration of motion to adjourn to time and place to be determined by the Board (if hearing is continued) SANTIAGO BLVD p TAFT a AVE a n KATELLA AVE VILLA PARK RD ORANGE PARK ACRES f .�, COLLINS `�• AVE r cn a a 3 0 J C W J -, CHAPMAN " AVE = m FIRE STATION LA VETA aask 0 c� 9 GARDEN GROVE fRWY y�` a 9 r•_ ¢ N 17TH •< ST z VILLA PARK R D k"r z o� `' �o 1 ST ST • GO w co P MC FADDEN AVE ORANGE PARK ACRES PUBLIC HEARING EDINGER AVE DECEikoisR ER 161 1076 U • 00 pM FIRE STATION NO. 23 5020 SANTIAGO BLVD. VILLA PARK , CA. � t t Chairman Saltarelli: It has been requested that the Chair introduce the Board members and possibly some of the other key participants in the proceedings prior to the meeting: Directors Don Saltarelli Councilman, City of Tustin Pete Barrett Councilman, City of Newport Beach John Burton Councilman, City of Irvine Ralph Clark Board of Supervisors John Garthe Mayor, City of Santa Ana Francis Glockner Board member, Costa Mesa San. Dist . Don Smith Councilman, City of Orange Staff members Fred Harper General Manager Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance & Secretary of the Boards Ray Lewis Chief Engineer Legal Counsel Thomas Woodruff General Counsel Aalk Peggy McElligott Special bond counsel Possibly recognize officials of Orange Park Association who initiated this proceeding. fi UAKU5 UP VJs`;L .0 Ud 5 County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 DISTRICT No. 7 540 0-2411 AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING RE : PROPOSED CONCURRENT ANNEXATION AND BOND AUTHORIZATION - ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA TIME: 8:00 P.M. , THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1976 PLACE : FIRE STATION No , 23 5020 SANTIAGO BOULEVARD VILLA PARK (SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE) (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Public Hearing re Proposed Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings - Orange Park Acres Annexation No. 51 .-� (a) Open hearing (b) Summary of resolution making determination (c) Summary of proceedings to date by District's Chairman (d) Review of engineering requirements to provide sanitary sewers for Orange Park Acres area by District's Engineer (e) Review of proposal by District's Bond Counsel (f) Review of Board actions to date by District's Secretary (g) Consideration of written protests, if any (h) Consideration of oral protests, if any (i) If a majority protest is not deemed to exist, then hearing may be closed and Board may proceed to consider adoption of Resolution No. , a resolution of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, making determinations, ordering annexation of territory subject to confirmation of voters, establishing terms and conditions of annexation, describing exterior boundaries of territory annexed, and calling special improvement district bond election; OR If a majority protest is deemed to exist, then hearing should be continued to to determine the sufficiency of the protests. (4) Other business and communications (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn to time and place to be determined by the Board (if hearing is continued) f' SANTIAGO BLVD p TAFT N AVE a KATELLA AVE VILLA PARK RD ORANGE PARK ACRES .� COLLINS AVE J` cn tikL� 'W H N W fA to • Q Q � w � ram• J •' � W J - CHAPMAN U. AVE _ °3 FIRE STATION LA VETA 0 c� 9 GARDf N 7r' fF: zz y 3 Q z ITTH \iiI < ST VILLA PARK R D wr IST ST • GO cl 5P MC FADDEN AVE ORANGE PARK ACRES PUBLIC HEARING EDINGER AVE DECEMB►=R 162 1976 8 . 00 PM FIRE STATION NO. 23 5020 SANTIAGO BLVD . VILLA PARK, CA. MANAGERS AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 812710844 Ellis Avenue OF Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 DISTRICT NO. 7 9622411 II December 165 1976 8 : 00 p .m. Public Hearing on the Proposed Orange Park Acres Annexation (Annexation No. 51) Public hearing agendas , as well as notices , have been mailed to all property owners within the proposed annexation, to advise them of Thursday ' s public hearing for the annexation of approximately 500 acres and an improvement bond election authorization in the amount of $1 ,025 , 000 . The public hearing notices included a map of the area under consideration and a description of the facilities to be constructed and/or acquired, .. as well as cost estimates involved for the individual property owners to obtain sanitary sewer services . As requested by Chairman Saltarelli, a hearing location map is printed on the reverse side of the agenda. The meeting is scheduled for 8 : 00 p.m. , December 16th, at Fire Station No. 23, 5020 Santiago Boulevard, Villa Park, California. Fred A. Harper General Manager RE: AGENDA ITEM #3(f) Proposed Orange Park Acres Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings Orange Park Acres Annexation No. 51 - • ) 11 ,� X Summary of Board Actions to date July 9, 19V; Received, filed and referred for study the proposal from Orange Park Association 0. August 13, .1-WoS Reviewed and studiedtproposal and alternatives with pro- ponents August 20, E Provided for proponent to deposit funds to cover all costs of proceedings relative to the proposed concurrent annexa- tion and bond authorization proceedings; and, Authorized engagement of engineers to prepare engineering report and environmental impact report including enconomic impact analysis _ 4 .. __. January 14, 1976 Received and filed/letter from Gieor-g-e—Rach-, Chairman of the Orange Park Acres Planning Committee, requesting annexation of the Orange Park Acres Area. The Board then requested additional information prior to further consi- deration of the request February 11, 444-7b Further considered the proposal and deferred action until March 10, 1976 March 10, 1 Received and filed communications from the Districtst General Counsel and the attorney for the proponents and, following considerable discussion, adopted Resolution No. 76-53-7 authorizing initiation of annexation pro- ceedings for the Orange Park Acres Area and filing with the Local Agency formation Commission July 14, Following further debate on the proposed procedures adopted Resolution No. 76-128-7, directing the Districts Chief Engineer to prepare the Engineering Report for the proposed Improvement District as required by the Cali- fornia Health and Safety Code, Section 4748, in connec- tion with proposed AnntrxTrti k--A-mes— a� H-�,—end, Adopted Resolution No. 76-129-7, determining that the Engineering Report of the Districts' Chief Engineer relating to the proposed Improvement District - Annexa- tion No. 51, complies with provisions of the County Sani- tation Districts Act, and fixing August 11, 1976, as the time for hearing objections thereto August 11, Following lengthy discussions of the proposal at the hear- ing, adopted, Resolution No. 76-147-7, approving and adopting the Engineers :report for Orange nark Acres Improvement District. Summary of Board Actions to date (coat.) September 8, W% Received and filed report of the General Counsel rela- tive to the proposed annexation and directed prepara- tion of information to be provided property owners relative to the proposed annexation and improvement district proceedings setting forth all information on the facilities to be provided pursuant to the pro- posed proceedings, and the local sewers that would have to be provided under separate financing arrangements to enable all properties to connect to the trunk system, and the total cost to the property owners f rr ! October 27, 1*76- Approved, with modifications/t iy, the informational material to be provided property owners relative to the public hearing regarding the proposal;--amid., Declared intent to adhere to a schedule of deadlines necessary to place the proposal on the ballot for the March, 1977, general election; and, Engaged the firm of Wilson, Jones, Morton and Lynch to prepare necessary documentation and procedures for the concurrent annexation and bond authorization proceedings November 10, 4@q4- Received, filed and adopted the Schedule of Proposed Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings; Adopted Resolution No. 76-200-7, initiating proceedings for annexation of territory, determining the necessity to incur a bonded indebtedness of a portion of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and of in- tention to form Improvement District No. 7-1, and fixing time and place of hearing thereon as December 16, 1976, at Fire Station No. 23; and, Adopted Resolution No. 76-202-7, making application for modification of terms and conditions together with the boundaries relating to Annexation No. 51 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 December 16th Public Hearing - (714) 962-2411 Agenda Item No. 3-c - Summary of Proceedings by District Chairman. January 28 , 1976, the Board of Directors of District No. 7 received a request for concurrent annexation and bond authorization from a group of residents and property owners on behalf of. the Orange Park Acres Association, Inc . March 10, 1976, the Board of Directors of District No . 7 autho- rized initiation of annexation proceedings and in June, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed annexation desig- nated Annexation No. 51 , subject to twelve conditions . Public Hearing - Public hearing agendas , as well as notices , have been mailed to all property owners within the proposed annexa- tion, to advise them of tonight ' s public hearing for the annexation of approximately 500 acres and an improvement bond election authori- zation in the amount of $1, 025 ,000. The public hearing notices in- cluded a map of the area under .consideration and a description of the facilities to be constructed and/or acquired, as well as cost estimates involved for the individual property owners to obtain sanitary sewer services. %W Election - The annexation and bond election, if approved, will involve the issuance of $1, 025 ,000 in bonds which will be repaid over a 15-year period by ad valorem taxes based on the assessed valuation of land and improvements within the annexed area. It is contemplated that the election will be held in March, 1977 . Bond Proceeds ($1, 025, 000) will pay the District No . 7 annexa- tion fees of $828 per acre approximately $418 ,000) . In addition, funds will be provided for the construction and/or acquisition of District Master Plan sewers, Reaches 17 and 18 (approximate value, $495,000) . It will also provide for the financing of the bond election ($35, 800) and pay the $250 residential hookup fee for each parcel ($100,000) . Annexation Fee - The $828 annexation fee was established by the Board of Directors by Resolution No . 76-53-7 on March 102 1976 . The annexation fee was established as follows : The District ' s assets minus its liabilities, divided by the number of acres within the District . On July 1, 1976, the annexation fee increased from $828 per acre to $961. Each subsequent July 1, the annexation fee will increase, based on the annexation fee formula. Installation of Local Sewers - The improvement district pro- ceedings will not provide the local sewers . However, it does provide for annexation to the Sanitation District and the Master Plan trunk sewers for the area. Local sewers can be provided for by the following methods : (1) Through a local sewering entity, such as a city (2) Through assessment district proceedings by Petition of 60% of the property owners within a described area (3) By private financing During consideration of Agenda Items 3-g and 3-h, we will address questions on the annexation proposal to make sure the property owners and residents have all the facts . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of•ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 November 24 , 1976 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA Public Hearing Thursday, December 16 , 1976 Fire Station No . 23 5020 Santiago Boulevard Villa Park, California A proposal for concurrent annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 and a sewer bond authorization of $1,025 ,000 have been proposed for the Orange Park Acres area. The proponents for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 have stated that older septic tanks are presently failing and an alternate method of disposing of sewage would be desirable for the entire area. The area proposed for annexation to District No. 7 encompasses approximately 500 acres and is divided into 400 parcels . Of the 400 parcels , over 75% are improved. Currently, the improved prop- erties in Orange Park Acres have individual on-site disposal systems and are not served by a sanitary sewer system. On January 28 , 1976, a proposal for concurrent annexation and bond authorization for the Orange Park Acres area was submitted to the Board of Directors of District No. 7 . The Board, on March 10, 1976, authorized initiation of annexation proceedings and in June, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed annexa- tion,designated Annexation No. 51 , subject to twelve conditions which will be described later in this text . The Directors of District No. 7 have ordered a public hearing on the proposed election for annexation and bond authorization to determine if there is reasonable property-owner support within the Orange Park Acres area to warrant the expense of conducting the election. Enclosed for the property owner and/or registered voter ' s information is a breakdown of anticipated sanitary sewer costs which will be borne by the property owners within Annexation No. 51, estimated to be $61,813 .75 per acre . Improvement District Bonds , $1,025 ,000. The annexation and bond election , if approved by a 2/3 majority of the registered voters within the territory to be annexed, will involve the issuance of $1 ,025 , 000 in bonds which will be repaid over a 15-year period by ad valorem taxes , based on the assessed value of land and improvements within the annexed area. The bond proceeds ( $1, 025, 000) will be used to pay the District No. 7 annexa- tion fee of $828/acre , for the construction or acquisition of District No. 7 Master Plan Sewers , Reaches 17 and 18 (approximate value $495 ,000) , financing of the bond election ( $35,000,) and the $250 residential hookup fee for each parcel ( $100 ,000) . The Improvement District bonds will be retired over a 15-year period and the estimated tax rate will vary from $0. 48 to $1. 66 during the life of the bonds . Attached is an estimated tax rate schedule for NO CALLED BONDS and for CALLED BONDS . The District No. 7 Directors will determine how the bonds will be 'sold after a successful election. Assessment District Bonds , $2 ,100 Per Acre. In addition to the Improvement District costs , each property owner will be subject to an assessment district cost of approximately $2 ,100 per acre to construct the local collection system, thereby providing sewer service for each property. Five Assessment Districts are proposed (see map) to construct the local 8-inch street sewers and the 4-inch house laterals to the property lines. The individual Assessment District proceed- ings will commence when the District No. 7 Board receives a petition signed by 60% of the property owners within a proposed Assessment District . Each parcel will be assessed (estimate , $2, 000-$2 ,200/acre) for a share of the construction costs . The assessment may be paid in cash at the time the property owner is billed or the assessment can go to bond as a first lien against the property and be paid for over a 12-15 year period at 7% simple interest . Actual Hookup Costs . The actual hookup is at the property owner' s option and expense. There is no District requirement that a residence be connected to the sewer. We estimate that the on-site sewer hookup cost will vary from $500 to $750 depending on how far each residence is from the 4-inch lateral which has been installed by the Assessment District to the property line. The District No. 7 connection charge of $250 is in- cluded in the Improvement District bond issue for each parcel of record as .of the date of the bond election. -2- County Sanitation District No. 7 Property Taxes . In addition to the taxes for the retirement of the Improvement District bonds , the properties within Annexation No. 51 will be subject to District No. 7 ' s property tax. The current rate is $0. 3485 per $100 assessed valuation on land and improvements only. Sewer Maintenance District Taxes . The local sewers will be maintained by the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts . The areas within Annexation No. 51 served by the District No. 7 gravity sewer system will be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District . There is a portion of proposed Assessment District No. 5 which will be served by a pumping station and the maintenance of this particular system will be the responsi- bility of the 70th Sewer Maintenance District . There is no Sewer Maintenance District annexation fee; however, the ad valorem tax rates for the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts are $0. 02 and $0. 17 respectively. For Additional Information. The District ' s staff is available to respond to questions concerning this proposed annexation prior to the public hearing scheduled for December 16th, by calling either Fred Harper, General Manager; Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer; or Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance. Fred A. Harper General Manager _3_ `���` Tom+•i� �ti•�: .. � } �!:.y.e:•.,r•• f p .... `► •� '•fllnl �•'I-. .�r.t.: i.a...•r 1r�y•.•:•:•• ,fib •. .. - �� - ! /) t ���-.I �� � •fit. •; �i:}�•:�i• '•�: OF ONCE ti t ~ 0. +•uwic uai[ .ISY f ►O�AIicE A • R � I T O sC.0 A.pp• v. NNW �f � 1( i ••►r f Y ` f. 1• l aRAkc LEGEND •,J•, ,' . J` .w►.;..,. :%fir•:.. \ IMPROVEMENT••�'• .� 'r' .��'. •�• 1 \= DISTRICT BOUNDARY t ..` :, 6:i..r t;: ::;:;:: �\ti -oFUTURE COUNTY SANITATION :>:;:r:;.;:•::; :::;:::: ;,;.i.: ��, DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SEWERS ?' ;•: :•:;.;:.; ::a:, ' y DIRECTION OF ON_ SITE DRAINAGE :. INTO SEWER • ,.. :t ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS '- TM. :•'r.•.. NAIY IN CITY 0/ ORANc AVCNU Ty f PROPOSED ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT COUNIr SANIIAIION OIS/[IC[ NO.7 01 ONANO[ COUNfr,CA[I[O[NIA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ORANGE PARK ACRES ANNEXATION ANNEXATION NO. 51 SUMMARY OF SANITARY SEWER COSTS 1. Improvement District Cost (Annexation including Portions of Reaches 17 and 18) Assume Fair Market Value of $70,000 (per OC assessor 3/75) for a one acre developed parcel $70,000 x 25% _ $17,500 AV Improvement District Cost = 17 ,500 x $1. 51 = $264 . 25 100 'Cost considered constant for 15 year reduction figured for trunk sewer reimbursement Total Improvement District Cost $264 . 25 x 15 years = $3,963 . 75 2. Assessment District Cost (Average) 2,100 . 00 3. On-Site Building Sewer Cost Estimate $500 - $750 per D.U. 750. 00 4. District No . 7 connection charge 0. 00 (This charge included in the improvement district cost) AVERAGE COST FOR DEVELOPED ONE ACRE PARCEL $61813.75 11-24-76 r . t PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT .► ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (ORANGE PARK ACRES) Estimated Increase in NO CALLED BONDS CALLED BONDS Assessed Valuation Tax Rate on Estimated Assessed Evaluation thousands 5,815M — — — — 6,lo6 — — — — 63,411 0. 4781 0. 4781 6,732 .5622 .5622 7,068 . 6275 1. 6669 7,422 .5410 1. 4563 7 ,793 1. 5392 1. 3973 8,182 1. 4715 1. 3363 8,591 1. 4026 1. 2739 9,021 1. 3330 1. 2104 9,472 1. 2632 1. 1464 9,946 1. 1934 1. 0822 101443 1. 1721 1. 0662 10,965 1. 0980 • 2767 *MW 11,513 1. 0688 . 3346 Following a successful bond election, the Board of Directors will determine the type of bonds to be sold (no called bonds or called bonds) . 11-24-76 ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ANNEXATION AND CONSTRUCTION PORTION REACH 18 7-0 TRUNK SEWER •.. ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE COST November, 1976 Estimated Item Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 1. Annexation (LAFC Cond. 8a) County Sanitation District No. 7 Annexation Fee 504 acres $828.001 $ 418,000 Preliminary Engineering Investigation, Reports, Finance & Legal Fees (LAFC Cond. 8c) 35,000 General Contingencies 122000 2. Construction (Portion of Reach 18) (LAFC cond. 8b) a. 2500 L.F. @$30/lf $75,000 b. Appurtenances 15,000 c. Contingencies 20,000 1103,000 3. Acquisition or Purchase of Portion of Reaches 17 & 18 (LAFC cond. 8b) 375,000 Interest 13 months ($1,025M @ 7%) 75,000 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE AMOUNT $1,025,000 Annual Debt Service with 7 percent, 15-year financing (Total) 109,790 Less reimbursement for trunk sewer purchase exclusive of one residential connection permit per parcel ($250) (LAFC cond. 9 and 10 26,333 NET ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE $ 83,457 Annual Improvement District Tax Rate a. October 1976 Assessed Value = $5,538,2502 b. Tax Rate 83,457 5,53 ,250 t 100 =- 1.51 per $100 of Assessed Value Annual County Sanitation District No. 7 Property Tax Rate = 0.3485 per $100 of Assessed Value i 1 Per Resolution No. 76-53-7 2 Estimated 5% increase over March, 1975 values adjusted to include only 500 acres 11-24-76 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ORANGE PARK ACRES Total Total Total Cost Number Linear Ft. Manholes Manholes & Sewers of Lots Acres Cost/Acre F, Assessment District #1 9 , 150 25 $211, 210 63 105 $2, 011.53 Assessment District #2 10 , 770 33 238, 530 88 120 1,987. 75 Assessment District #3 7,400 24 163, 860 52 75 2, 184. 80 Assessment District #4 7, 740 26 176, 413 47 85 2,075. 45 Assessment District #5 11, 860 41 275,595* 157 130 2,119. 86 *Includes Sewage Pump Facilities and Force Main Costs Total Cost All Assessment Districts = $1,065,608 Total Acreage Served = 515 acres Average Cost Per Acre - All Assessment Districts = $2,069. 14 11/22/76 Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC) Conditions . On June 14 , 1976, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed annexation designated Annexation No . 51 to County Sanitation District No. 7 , subject to the following conditions : 1. Approval by a majority of the voters within the " territory to be annexed. 2. Payment by the landowners of the annexed territory of $828 per acre for the acreage involved, being the amount established as the standard annexation fee by action of the Board of Directors, being equal to the cost of rights of service and use of the existing treatment and outfall facilities of District No. 7 . 3. Payment of proponents of all engineering, legal, administrative and election costs incurred in processing the annexation, to be reimbursed from bond proceeds in the event of completion of annexa- tion. 4 . That the annexed territory shall be subject to the terms and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees or connection to the District facilities and use of said facilities . 5 . The territory proposed to be annexed shall con- currently be annexed into the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts . 6 . The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retire- ment of all existing and future bonds of the District as a whole. 7. The formation of a new improvement district of Sanitation District No. 7 for the purpose of acquiring rights of service and use in existing facilities of said District No. 7 and for the purpose of constructing or acquiring major trunk lines to serve the area, comprised of the lands within the proposed annexation or such thereof as are found to be benefited pursuant to hearings had thereon by the District , such improvement district to be created concurrently with, and not separately from, the proceedings for annexation. r.. n r ` a. The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate rights of service and use in the existing treatment and outfall facilities of Sanitation District No. 7 in an amount equal to that set forth in Condition No. 2 . b. The sum necessary to provide those portions of the major trunk lines designated on the Sanitation District No. 7 Master Plan as Reaches 17 and 18 necessary to serve the area proposed to be annexed, less the proportionate amount thereof applicable to lands already within Sanitation District No. 7 which abut and would be served by any part of that system. c. The sums advanced to pay costs of annexation proceedings , being the amount referred to in Condition No. 3 thereof. 9. In exchange for the advance of the sums necessary for said Reaches 17 and 18 , by the bond issue , each parcel of land in existence and of record as of the date of the election shall be entitled, at no further charge except as provided in Condition No. 12 hereof, to one connection to the sewer system of Sanitation District No. 7. 10. The District shall provide for contribution to the bond redemption fund established for the payment of the bonds of the improvement district of such amounts and from such sources as would be provided under the existing Sanitation District No. 7 policy of reimbursement relating to Master Plan sewers . 11. The annexation shall become effective only after the formation of the improvement district by the affirmative vote of a majority of those voting on the proposition and the authorization of the general obligation bonds by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of those voting on the proposition. 12. In addition to the connection charges required by Ordinance No. 716, of County Sanitation District No. 7 , those proper- ties receiving service by direct connection to the trunk sewer shall pay an additional connection service charge in an amount to be determined by the District . These monies shall, upon receipt , be applied for bond redemption. 11/3/76 ORANGE PARK ACRES ANNEXATION AND BONDS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY . Proposed Last Dates* BOND ELECTION PROCEDURE SCHEDULE 1976 Nov. 10 (1) District No. 7 adopts Res . Initiating Annexation and Setting Hearing (between 15(11/25/76) and 60(1/9/77) days after setting) . Nov. 30/ (2) Secretary - Publish Resolution or Notice once a week for Dec. 7- two weeks in a newspaper of general circulation within Dis- trict No. 7, first publication being at least 15 days prior to date fixed for hearing (Gov't. Code 6066, 56083) . Nov. 30 to Post Resolution or Notice on or near door of regular meeting Dec. 5 place at least 15 days prior to date fixed for hearing and remain posted at least 5 days (Gov' t. Code 56085, 56086) . Nov. 30 Mail Resolution or Notice at least 15 days prior to date fixed for hearing (Gov' t. 'Code 56087, 56088) . (a) To all landowners within the territory proposed for annexation, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll (Govtt. Code 56089(e) , 56312(a)) . (b) To all persons, counties , cities , or districts which have filed written request for special notice with District Secretary (Gov't. Code 56312(b)) . Dec. 16 (3) At hearing (which may be continued up to 60 days (2/14/77)) District No. 7 board may exclude unbenefited property (i.e. , land previously annexed) from either or both the annexed area/the improvement district after notifying LAFC (Gov' t. Code 56315) . (a) A majority protest not withdrawn prior to the close of hearing terminates proceedings - either more than 50% of registered voters or more than 50% of the assessed value of 1977 land proposed for annexation (Gov't. Code 56316) . Jan. 5 (b) Absent a majority protest, the Board must, not later than 30 days (1/14/77) after conclusion of Hearing, either disapprove the annexation or order annexation subject to confirmation of the voters (Gov' t. Code 56319.1, 56320, Rev. & Tax. Code 2260(2)) . Jan. 10 (4) Election, if called, to be held within the territory being annexed on the annexation question and within the improve— ment district on the bonds. Within 5 days after call, LAFC executive officer shall be notified by registered mail (Gov' t. Code 56119) . Jan. 12 (5) LAFC executive officer prepares an '7mpartial Analysis" -� -of the propositions to be approved by LAFC and submitted to the officials conducting the election no less than 54 days (1/13/77) before the election (Gov't. Code 56119) . *NOTE: The dates specified represent substantially the last dates if election is to be held in March. Proposed ... Last Dates* 1977 Jan. 13 (6) Arguments for or against -propositions must be filed at least 54 days before the election (Gov' t. Code 56120) . Feb. 22 Ballot Pamphlet mailed to each voter at least 10 days prior to election (Gov' t. Code 56122) . Feb. 11, Resolution Calling Election published once a week for 3 18, 25 weeks (Health & Safety Code 4785) . Mar. 3 (7) Election - Annexation - majority of votes cast. Bonds - 2/3rds of votes cast. Mar. 14 (8) Canvass of returns - Mar. 14 (9) District No. 7 Board declares by resolution votes cast on each proposition and confirms order of attachment. �r a ' i -2- f PUBLIC NOTICE RE ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA PROPOSED ANNEXATION BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56087, 56088, 56089(e) , 56312(a) s 56312(b) RESOLUTION NO.76.200-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE DOARD OF DIRECTORS INfTIAT- INO PPOCECDINOS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY, DETEEI.IININO THE NECCL--ITY TO I!:CUR A CONDED INDZaTEDi.ct;:;OF A PU,T1011 OF COL^.r iY E:1atTAT10N D1STR!CT P.O.70F O%%;.'C_—COU.Y t.':D O;:I.NTCNTION TO FO i1 I:..? OYG!.::NT G;;Tf,;Cf i:0.7•1 A`10 FIY 1:0 A TIMEAND PLACE OF HEARING THLR ON(ANNEXATION NO.61—ORANGE PARK ACRES) _ WHEREAS,the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County,State amount of the debt to be Incurred.Sald date Is not Isss then fifteen(15)dsys or more of California, has, by resolution no. 7&92, adoDlod July 14, 1976, approved an than sixty(30)days from the data of edoption of this rnno!ution.Any Intcrastad application for the annexation of certain territory to this District pursuant to Me portion dusiring ld ma.:e written p. • st o'lain31 said tnn_xation snail do 60 by provisions of law, and has 0e3ignated this District as the District to conduct written communication filed with the Secretary of the Board t.ol later loan the four annexation proceedings pursuant to la,v;and sot for hearing. WHEREAS,pursuant to such resolution,conoln terms end conditions were A written protest by a landowner shalt contain a description sufficient to Proposed to bra Impotcd Including the formation of an Improvement district and Ina IrWanlily the ILnd owned by him;a prote3t by a voter a131I contain the ronidontral authorization of{anoraf obli;ation bonda thereof; address of such vote(. NOW,THEREFORE.THE BOARD OF DIR;CTCR9 OF COUNTY SANITATION 16.At the time and place fixed for hearing,any person Intereeled,Including DISTRICT NO.7,00=5 HEREBY FIND,D'TERMINE AND ORDER,es fnllovr: all persons owning property in th3 Diclrlct cr In tha pre aced imorovemeni dalrict, 1.A resolution fNo.7 -53.7)of eppii=Ion for the enncxetion of lorritory was may app_:r and plot:3t the inciuc!on o1 his prdp.ny within me rropo:^0 adopted by this Board of Dtractors on March 10, 1278, commencing such Improvement district,andlor present any other manor material to Ina qusctions sal proebodings, forth in this recolutlan, 2. The distinctive short form designation a3zlgnW by the Local Agency 17.Tha Sceretary of Ih3 Board shall provide for notice of such hearing by Formation Commission to the territory prcposed to b3 annexed Is Annexation No. publication of this resolution onto a wa:K for two suCCCSSIva walks,wdh at 1..:_t 51(No.7&1)to County Sanitation Dialriet No. 7,the description of tho exterior fiva l5)days Intervening botwoen the ruspaetive publication dates, not eountmg 'boundaries of such territory Wing Set forth on Exhibit "A",attached hereto and such publication dates in the Tustin Nsw3, a no vtpapur of general clrcuiaron made a part hareof by reference. within the SHOctcd District and County,&:id publication to be commenced at is.,3t 3.Tho territory Cropo:nd to be annexed Is Inhabited as such term Is doflned In tilloon(15)d:.yo prior to ih3 dale spccir;cd herein for hearing. Division 1 of TRIO 8 of the Government Code. 18.The Sccretary than furthor eausa notice of ouch hoating by posting a copy 4.The reason for the proper ad annexation as rat forth In the proposal thereof of this resolution on or n.:ar the door of Ina mc_tino price of this Board, rid Is to provide eanitary acwor sorvlee3 to Said territory as requested by the Orange Costing to b3 comm3nccri at least 11ftc:n(15)day3 prior to V a r,03 specified hi•c,n Park Acres ASsocisllon, for hooting and continue to the lime of sa:o t•=rinn.A copy of sold resolutlon*:.all 5.1h9 forms and eondttlens &of forth in Exhibit "8",attached hereto and further be posted In lhre3 (3) public places vdenin lha proposed improvem_rit Incorporated herein,eroapphoablu to the propoeotl enncxstlon, district at least two weeks oeforo the time fixed for Said hearing. 6.Proccading3 are hereby Initiated for the annexation to this District of the 19.Said Secretary Shall also give mailed notice of such hearing at least(15)• terrllores dc3crlbed In said Exhibit"A". days prior to trio data thereof as specified herein,to all Icndov,nors owr,ing tams 7.Pursuant to Sccilon 4743 of the Health end Safety Code,and the ordor of r;lthln the territory proposed to b9 annexed,sdcro3sed to such person to v.ttcct this F,ocrd,end lotlowing notice Pre hctrini tharpOn,thi3 Doutl has duly adopted land within said territory Is a3S03ced as ehp•rcn upon the last oqua;,zcd c_sTe*rnoat an Englncor's R.pon,by resoluti,n no.7Cr137.7,dafad Au^,u3t 11,1978. roll o1 the County of Orange,at such p1r3on's ajt:ress r.3 arown upon such ton,cr &Pursu Sol to Stclion 4;1,3 of the Hczllh and Safety Coda,this Board hereby where any such parson is no longar the Ov.n�f, then odutesaad to try psrscin determir,as lh;d it i3 necose vy t0 incur Woucd IP;.9tatln6c3 to obtain funcis w141Pt entitled to bd shown as ownor on the next o333:3m ant rcii,Or wnoro land is eu G.act which to ecqulre the rinhts end prc,-My Pnd to do Ih3 work sst forth in the report l0 a recorded written 1pr,;3mCnt of arias, lhPn i.:.'a::^J IJ ViaCcreLn shc.in and dcsctib„+d In the alt..hOd terms and condh=3(Exh�otl"8"). thoroln bar purcha38r and adcre3sed to any public cy_ncy c,,rning land within-,Sid 9.Th3 g.naral oblocts and purposes for which Iha prcpo.ad dcbl Is to b9 Territory,and to all persons and counties,cities or 01ytnctS,v:hich snail tharetofure Incurred Is thz acqulsition or ri,vas of a^rvlce and u:3 of Ir.e existing!reatmpnt end bryo fifud a written request for special noti,3 with _- id E,crulary, or with the outfall facilities of District No. 7, and fcr t'.3 Ccrpa.a of lh3 acqutsltion or County Asso.sor, pursuant to Suction 5AiX15 of tt,a Gotarnmenl C:odo, oy construction of m.Jor trunk llna3.1.aoltiO3 end c; unenancas to carve the portion doposl!!ng n copy of 11113 resolution, first class, postsgo prepaid. In the United of tho Distr! t +ithln raid 6nrixr.0on No. 5t 1t;n. 7c-11, P...d lr3 --cclal1'0 0tt etsemanl.•,r�gh�a of a;,y and etner prep:rly er Structure;nc'c(Mary or eemongcnl Slates ensile. therefor,to ether with all tests end estimated copes mcicanlJ to orconnocted with PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular mooting hold November 10,1976. the acquisltloo,,construction,improving or financing Of Ina project. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 10.Thst tho emounl of debt io be incurred is 51,025,OL0.00. COUNTY SANITATION DiSTnICT NO.7 OF It.That this Board intends to form an impro•rcm3nl district of that portion of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA the District and of Annexation No.51(No.tilt)which,In Ms opinion of this Board, will ba benefited,the exterior boundariss of which proposed ImDrovement district J.Wayne Sylvester are sot forth on a map entitled"Annexation No.78-1 to County Sanitation District (Secretary No.7;'which reap Is on file with this Board and shall govern for all d6talis a3 to the h:Taw Tustin News extent of tho proposed Improv Publish:,,mont oistret. Nevus 6 Dee.2,1976. 12_That should the prc o=3d annexation be approved,this Board Intends to Call an election In Such Improvrmunt district on a data to bar fixed,for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters thereof• the proposition of incurring an Indebtedness by the Issuance of bonds of Ina District for aJd improvement district. 13.That taxes for the payment of said bonds and the interest thereon shall be derived exclusively from an annual tax uDen and real progeny within the Improvarhenl district, provided, however, that the OIsIrICI shall prorids for Contribution t0 ins bond redemption fund ostaclishod for the payment of such bonds of ouch amounts end from such sources car would be provided under existing County Sanitation District No.7 policy of raimoureOment relating to master plan Viewers. 14.That the Engineer's Report,together with a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed Improvement district with relation to the territory Immediatoly contiguous thereto and to the oropoc:d improvements,are on file with tM District Board and are available for Insp^coon by any poron interested. 15.That Thursday,the 18th day of Dacember,1978,at the hour of 8:000'CIOek P.M.,at Fire Station No.23,`_O 0 Santiago Boulevard, Vll;a Park,California. are hereby fixed as the time and place for a hearing by the Board on the proposad annexation and On the question of the formation of the proposed Improvement district,the extent thereof, the Rroposed acquisition andlLnP"rhicnt and!ha. r r t ANNEXATTOIONN NO.I 1L1 TO amieff oir 0. COUNTY SANITATION D13TRICT NO.T ANNEXATION NO.91(NO.M11, AN Mat certain land situated In the unincorporated territory of the County of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 Crwgm State of Califtlrnla,mars particularly described as follows: PARCEL I: TERMS AND CONOiTiONS . Beginning at■point In the boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 as 1.Approval by a majority of•the voters within We territory to be annexed. established by"Annexation No.30,"said point being Ina Northwest corner of said 2.Payment by the landowners Of the annexed lenitory,of iaU pet acre for the annexation,said comer also(wing a point In the existing boundary line Of in*City OI acreage Involved,being the amount eeiabitshod as the standard annexation Ina by Orange se established by"Annexation NO.231"; action Of the Board at Directors,being equal to the cost Of rights of service and use Thence In a general Soulharly. Easterly and Northerly direction along few of the existing treatment and Oulfall facilities ofDletnct No,T. boundary line at said County Sanitation Utstrict No. 7 and along said existing 3.Payment of proponents of all englnearing,loyal,administrative and election boundary time of trio City of Orange inro0gn Courses t through 3 to the NMineny Costa Incurred In processing the annexation,to be reimburead from bond proceeds terminus of that certain course described as"S.4'18'45"E.,548.22 lads,moro or In the event of completion of annexation. bes" In sold existing boundary line of Ina City of Orange ►s aslabnslled by 4.That the snnuxad territory shell be subject to the terms and conditions of all "Annexation No.231": ordinances porlaining to foes or connection to the District facliAlas and use of said Thence leaving said existing boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 facilities. and continuing along s:.d e.iating poune:xy line of the City of Orange In a general 5.The territory proposed t0 be ennered shall concurrently be annexed Into the Easterly and Northerly in ieLcuon throwgh C9urteD 4 and 5 to a point In the boundary 71h and loth Sower MaintonanCe Districts. - line of County SjAIIrtt.,n D+atrlct No.7 as a7!callshed by"Annexation No.32"and a A.The territory,upon annexation,shall be subject t0 ell ad valorem taxes point In the center line of Santiago Canyon Road; required for the retirement of all existing end future bonds of Ina District es a w hose. Thence leaving said existing DounCary line of :tie City of Orange and 7.The formation of a r,,.w Improvement dsuirict of Sanitation D,air!ct No 7 for continuing along said bounaary line of County Sanitation District No. 7 as the purpose of scousring rights at service end ure In ux!nIfng Iced tins of said ealabilshod by AnnCxalion No. :Y' In a general Sout`e:.aleny and Northerly District No.7 and for the purpoes of constructing or"cutting major trur.f,lingo to direction through Ceuas 6 and 7 to Ina Southerly terminus of trial certain course serve the area,eompn_ed of the lenee'witnln the prcpoi.:,d arnevation or such described as"S.3.44 E..X4.24 feet"In Bald existing boundary line of the City of thereof as are found to bu b,nefitod pursuant to hearth;: had tnrreon by the Orengeaaealabllshadby"Annoxat.on No.231"; District, such lmprovoment district t0 to created concurrently with, and not Thenco contlnul,g along said boundary fine of County Ssnilstion District No. separatolyfrom,the proceedings for anresallon. 7 and aoong said extatir j boundary,line of its City Of Orange In a;enetal Northerly S.The approval by the volera of sold Improvement district fat an o!octicn hold and Easterly direction tmougn Coausus 8 and 13A to trio Southerly terminus Of filet wncurrenlly with and not separately from the o;octlon on the ennoxalion)of Quneral certain course dascribad as"S.0.28'04"W.,607.88 feel"In said"Annexation No. obligation bonds determined by the sold Senitation District NO.7 to be sufficient, 32": with applicable Incidental expenses,to pay the following: Thanes tearing Wd boundary Inns of County Sanitation District No.7 and continuing along said IF xleting boundary Imo of the City of Orange as established by s.The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate rights of Bald"Annexation No.=1"Ihroucn Courses 9 tnrough 33 to a point in the Northony sarviee and use In the existing treatment and Oulfall fxiinWs at boundary line of County Sanitation District NO.7 sa oala[hahad Dy"Annexation No. Sanitation District No.1 In an amount equal to that sot tariff In Con. 27",sold point Doing t'.a Southerly torminus of that certain course described as dition No.2. "South 791.41 fVot"In sa,d existing boundary line of the City of Orange: b.The sum necessary to provide thou portions Of the major Thence continuiri along said existing boundary line of the City of Orange as trunk linos designated on the Sanitallon Clstrlct No.7 master plan established by"Annexalien No.255"and by"Annoxetion No.229"and along told ►a Reaches 17 and 18 neooseery to eafve lite eree proposed to be existing boundary of County SarZoon District No.7 e3 ectauiishdd by"Annexation annexed,loss tho proporifonste amount thereof to land* No.27"In a Wes orly d,•ecaon atone Course 34 a distance of 1141152lost; already within S!.nitalion District No.7 which etut and would be Thence haying s .d existlrg Dounaary of County.sanitation District No.7 and served by an continuing along se;d x ssstln2 Wura,ry Itr,o ofA Ilia `City of Orange r3 aste.olisnod by Y Dtsn of that system. aiafQAc auiass�u f�i+s3lt�frc4an`�Y to a WIXi in`st �cun&outfnnyo�i aUt ty c.TM sumo advanced to pay costs of annexation proeesdings, G "ry being the amount referred to In Condition No.3 thereof. Sanitation District No.7 as osfabu,hed by"Annexation No.7' Trmnce contlnu;na along said existing boundary 11.1e Of the Clly Of Ortnge as 9.In exchange for the advance of the sums necessary for slid Reaches 17 and established by "Annexation No. <55" and :.long b.:Id boundary fine of Courly 18,by the bond Issue,each rwcel of land In csietenpe and of reword as of the date of Sseltation-Dislriel No.7 in a Westerly direction along Course 53 adistance of an.61 the election shall be entitled,at no further chi rr.e except as provio^d In Condition feet- No.12 hereof,to one connection to the sewer syatem of rill:anon District No.7. Theme leaving sold boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 and 10.The District shall provide for contribution to the bord redamDllon fund Continuing along sai4 existing boundary line of the City of O.,LnQ3 as established by established for the payment of the bonds Of the Improvement district of such said"Annexation No.255"and ea "Annexation No.Z59"In a general Northerly, nt pitd}ro s n-rnucos rs NPuli p, jOv1C:•t unCAr tits existing C mitation E7e4rYcl o.7po�cy rcimcarL,,won.rot:.;,n�sea:a_•t:;p:,r mars. Westerly end Southerly direction through Courses�)i Inrough 52 to a point In the 11. The annexation shall bucon-4 ell"tive only aR,;i t'la formation of the existing boundary line of County Serration District No.7 as established by an Improvement district Dy the affirmative vote of a r-..,',ilty of these voting on he "Exclusion"adopted by Orange County hoard of Supervisors per Resolution No.01- proposition and the authorization of the donwal obligation bonds by the affirmative 93detad January 23,1a81; > 1 �i N I .. vote oftwb-thlydsof those votingon the prol:0attion. Ttence iii,.iving s..;J oxii,li boundary lino Of the City of Orcn;e In a Conarad 12.ir.addition to the connection charges required by Ordinance f:o.116.of NOW Southwest"dliecCon along se-4 existing pound" line of County Sanitation County Sanitation District No. 7 those proparlw3 recelving xdrvlce by dlrccl Dlstrlet No.7 as esW:e:aped by taid Aesolation No.61-i•3 and by an"Exclusion" connection to the trunk sewer shall Day an&Jc4ioral cornecmi n service crwge In adopted by Bald Dowd of Supervisors-Documbur 17,1>6a;cassgnalod car Orange an amount to be determined b iris District.These moaias shall,u Park Acres - A on pz:,% idl through Courses 53 through 64 t0 the Southerly applied for Dond redemption. Y con re.eipl,be prblongstion 43 of Miscsilanotpus MaDs,Records of Bala County; Thence Isavino i id Willing Dounaary of County Sanitation District No.7 along said Southerly prolongation and Westerly line Of Tract No.918 through Ihs following bearings and Otstances(courss numbers designated as 65 through 71):N. 1'51'E,E50.93 feet; Thence N.7.17.20"W.,1039.02 f set; Thence N.53.42'W.,213.70 foes; Thence N.87.33'W.,829.?0 leer; Thence N.18.DC'20"W.,1416 14 feel: Thence N.0'40-50"W.,337.96!set; Thence N.50'10'30"E.,303.87 feet to an angle point In the existing boundary, Ilne Of the City of Orange as astifbusned by"Annexation No.191",said angle ocint bal ,the SJuthweateny terminus of that Certain course descrtbed as"N.72'12' W.I. -Q. feet"In srld anroxalion, Th3nca In a general NorthEasterly direction along said existing boundary line of the City o1 Orange as establlshtid by said"Annexation No.191",by"Detachment No.161•A",by said"Anrexation No. 191",and by"Annexation No.228"through Courses 72 through 95 to a Doint in the boundary dne of County Sanitation District No.7.said point being the Northwest comer of"Annexation No.31". . Thence leaving eatd existmo Do6.i"ry line of the City of Orange and along said boundary line ct County Sanitation District No. 7 as estaOOsned by 4at0 `Annexation No. 31" in a General Southerly, Easterly and Northerly direction - through Courses 96 througtl 9a to ins Northeast comer of said"Annexation Nn.31". *aid corner being&'point in slid existing boundary line of tie City of Orange as established by said"Annexation No.228"; Thence leaving azid boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 and Wong said existing boundary line of ins City of Orange as established by said `Annexation No.226"in a General Northerly,and Easterly direction through Courses 99 and 100 to the Po;-tt of Beginning. The above parcel of land contains 537.79 acres,more or lsaa. PARCEL 2 Beginning at a point In the boundary line of County Sanitation District NO.7, said point Doing the riarlhwast corner of an"Exclusion"adopted by the Orange County Board of Suparvlsors-December 17,19fA(designated as Oiang a Park Acres -T on Pape 13),sold Northwest corner also being a point in the Westerly One Of Inc _ land descrlbed In a Coed recorded In Book 2764.Pape 150 of Official Records of said County of Orange; Munt.3 along said Ioumci,-y time of County Sanitation established by said`Exclusion"through trio following coot Ms: 404.W taut; Thence S.46"24.40"E..57.70 test; Thsxs S.79'24'40"E..96.35 test; Thence N.0'W 40"W.,470.00 lest: f Thence S.MI 44.10"W..150.37 lost to the Point of Beginning, The above pares,of land contains 1.47 acres,more otiose. All references to course rat-moors within this description are to course numbers as shown on the map designed"Annexation No.75-1 to County Sanitation District No. 7".The use of sad coutee numbers is to facilitate competing this description to the map. t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of•ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA V.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 November 24 , 1976 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA Public Hearing Thursday, December 16, 1976 Fire Station No. 23 5020 Santiago Boulevard Villa Park, California A proposal for concurrent annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 and a sewer bond authorization of $1 ,025 ,000 have been proposed for the Orange Park Acres area. The proponents for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 have stated that older septic tanks are presently failing and an alternate method of disposing of sewage would be desirable for the entire area. The area proposed for annexation to District No. 7 encompasses approximately 500 acres and is divided into 400 parcels . Of the 400 parcels , over 75% are improved. Currently, the improved prop- erties in Orange Park Acres have individual on-site disposal systems and are not served by a sanitary sewer system. On January 28 , 1976, a proposal for concurrent annexation and bond authorization for the Orange Park Acres area was submitted to the Board of Directors of District No. 7 . The Board, on March 10, 1976, authorized initiation of annexation proceedings and in June , the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed annexa- tion,designated Annexation No. 51 , subject to twelve conditions which will be described later in this text . The Directors of District No. 7 have ordered a public hearing on the proposed election for annexation and bond authorization to determine if there is reasonable property-owner support within the Orange Park Acres area to warrant the expense of conducting the election. Enclosed for the property owner and/or registered voter ' s information is a breakdown of anticipated sanitary sewer costs which will be borne by the property owners within Annexation No . 51 , estimated to be $6,813. 75 per acre . Improvement District Bonds , $1,025 ,000 . The annexation and bond election, if approved by a 2/3 majority of the registered voters within the territory to be annexed, will involve the issuance of $1 , 025 ,000 in bonds which will be repaid over a 15-year period by ad valorem taxes , based on the assessed value of land and improvements within the annexed area. The bond proceeds ($1,025, 000) will be used to pay the District No. 7 annexa- tion fee of $828/acre , for the construction or acquisition of District No. 7 Master Plan Sewers , Reaches 17 and 18 (approximate value $495 ,000) , financing of the bond election ( $35,000.) and the $250 residential hookup fee for each parcel ( $100,000) . The Improvement District bonds will be retired over a 15-year period and the estimated tax rate will vary from $0 . 48 to $1. 66 during the life of the bonds . Attached is an estimated tax rate schedule for NO CALLED BONDS and for CALLED BONDS . The District No. 7 Directors will determine how the bonds will be sold after a successful election. Assessment District Bonds , $2 ,100 Per Acre. In addition to the Improvement District costs , each property owner will be subject to an assessment district cost of approximately $2 ,100 per acre to construct the local collection system, thereby providing sewer service for each property. Five Assessment Districts are proposed (see map) to construct the local 8-inch street sewers and the 4-inch house laterals to the property lines. The individual Assessment District proceed- ings will commence when the District No. 7 Board receives a petition signed by 60% of the property owners within a proposed Assessment District . Each parcel will be assessed (estimate , $2,000-$2 ,200/acre) for a share of the construction costs . The assessment may be paid in cash at the time the property owner is billed or the assessment can go to bond as a first lien against the property and be paid for over a 12-15 year period at 7% simple interest . Actual Hookup Costs . The actual hookup is at the property owner' s option and expense. There is no District requirement that a residence be connected to the sewer. We estimate that the on-site sewer hookup cost will vary from $500 to $750 depending on how far each residence is from the 4-inch lateral which has been installed by the Assessment District to the property line. The District No. 7 connection charge of $250 is in- cluded in the Improvement District bond issue for each parcel of record as .of the date of the bond election. -2- County Sanitation District No. 7 Property Taxes . In addition to the taxes for the retirement of the Improvement District bonds , the properties within Annexation No. 51 will be subject to District No. 7 ' s property tax. The current rate is $0. 3485 per $100 assessed valuation on land and improvements only. Sewer Maintenance District Taxes . The local sewers will be maintained by the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts . The areas within Annexation No. 51 served by the District No. 7 gravity sewer system will be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District . There is a portion of proposed Assessment District No. 5 which will be served by a pumping station and the maintenance of this particular system will be the responsi- bility of the 70th Sewer Maintenance District . There is no Sewer Maintenance District annexation fee ; however, the ad valorem tax rates for the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts are $0 . 02 and $0. 17 respectively. For Additional Information. The District ' s staff is available to respond to questions concerning this proposed annexation prior to the public hearing scheduled for December 16th, by calling either Fred Harper, General Manager; Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer; or Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance_. Fred A. Harper General Manager -3- 1 isr.�_ _`\`•t_ 'IS r i► • •.{r•••'f•�:::•�• ':•�r• 1`_-f:�/F ••,• '1 •A.�-l.y i. �:-,; ',•. Ak t`) �v •• .':.:;:.i.•.i•••'•'• �t if RHA ,CE, i=,:`'a•. '.':C. 14 < O u I y O,c - pe�"cc L l + w tty �F.�opNKCE ( I O a... suit LE-14"M 1 f •:ram-�=:•. r` r: JJ r, Lk �/ r. u�2 LEGEND `" ' �.. 1 •. �._�_::.:; 1'' : OFtAkGt IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY FUTURE C SANITATION ::' =^•::;: SEWE DISTRICT R IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SEWERS N SIREC ION OF ON-SITE DRAINAGE EWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ...... urr o. ORANG HAVM►N •YfNU \' kk _ COUNTY ORANGE t PROPOSED ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY SANITATION 01%r[ICf NO.7 0 F OEAN01 COUNTY,CAUFOEN,A .... ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ORANGE PARK ACRES ANNEXATION ANNEXATION NO. 51 SUMMARY OF SANITARY SEWER COSTS 1. Improvement District Cost (Annexation including Portions of Reaches 17 and 18) Assume Fair Market Value of $70,000 (per OC assessor 3/75) for a one acre developed parcel $70,000 x 25% = $17 ,500 AV Improvement District Cost = 17 ,500 x $1. 51 = $.264. 25 � 100 *Cost considered constant for 15 year reduction figured for trunk sewer reimbursement Total Improvement District Cost $264 . 25 x 15 years = $3,963 . 75 2. Assessment District Cost (Average) 2,100 . 00 3. On-Site Building Sewer Cost Estimate $500 - $750 per D.U. 750. 00 4. District No. 7 connection charge 0. 00 (This charge included in the improvement district cost) AVERAGE COST FOR DEVELOPED ONE ACRE PARCEL $6,813 . 75 11-24-76 f PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (ORANGE PARK ACRES) Estimated Increase in NO CALLED BONDS CALLED BONDS Assessed Valuation Tax Rate on Estimated Assessed Evaluation thousands 5,815M - - - - 6,106 - - - - 61411 0. 4781 0. 4781 6,732 . 5622 . 5622 7 ,068 . 6275 1. 6669 7,422 . 5410 1. 4563 7 ,793 1. 5392 1. 3973 8,182 1. 4715 1. 3363 8,591 1. 4026 1. 2739 9,021 1. 3330 1. 2104 9,472 1. 2632 1. 1464 9,946 1.1934 1. 0822 10,443 1. 1721 1. 0662 10,965 1. 0980 . 2767 11,513 1. 0688 • 3346 Following a successful bond election, the Board of Directors will determine the type of bonds to be sold (no called bonds or called bonds) . 11-24-76 ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ANNEXATION AND CONSTRUCTION PORTION REACH 18 7-0 TRUNK SEWER ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE COST November, 1976 Estimated Item Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 1. Annexation (LAFC Cond. 8a) County Sanitation District No. 7 Annexation Fee 504 acres $828.00 1 $ 418,000 Preliminary Engineering Investigation, Reports, Finance & Legal Fees (LAFC Cond. 8c) 35,000 General Contingencies 12,000 2. Construction (Portion of Reach 18) (LAFC cond. 8b) a. 2500 L.F. @$30/lf $75,000 b. Appurtenances 15,000 c. Contingencies 20,000 1102000 3• Acquisition or Purchase of Portion of Reaches 17 & 1$ (LAFC cond. 8b) 375,000 Interest 13 months ($1,025M @ 7%) 75,000 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE AMOUNT $1,025,000 Annual Debt Service with 7 percent, 15-Year financing (Total) 109,790 Less reimbursement for trunk sewer purchase exclusive of one residential connection permit per parcel ($250) (LAFC cond. 9 and 10 26,333 NET ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE $ 83,457 Annual Improvement District Tax Rate a. October 1976 Assessed Value = $5,538,2502 b. Tax Rate - 83,457 5953 ,250 . 100 -. 1.51 per $100 of Assessed Value Annual County Sanitation District No. 7 Property Tax Rate - 0.3485 per $100 of Assessed Value 1 Per Resolution No. 76-53-7 2 Estimated 5% increase over March, 1975 values adjusted to include only 500 acres 11-24-76 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ORANGE PARK ACRES Total Total Total Cost Number Linear Ft. Manholes Manholes & Sewers of Lots Acres Cost/Acre Assessment District #1 9, 150 25 $211, 210 63 105 $2,011.53 Assessment District #2 10,770 33 238, 530 88 120 1,987. 75 Assessment District #3 7, 400 24 163, 860 52 75 2,184. 80 Assessment District #4 7, 740 26 176,413 47 85 2,075.45 Assessment District #5 11, 860 41 275,595* 157 130 2,119. 86 *Includes Sewage Pump Facilities and Force Main Costs Total Cost All Assessment Districts = $1, 065, 608 Total Acreage Served = 515 acres Average Cost Per Acre - All Assessment Districts = $2,069. 14 11/22/76 Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC) Conditions . On June 14 , 19761, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed annexation designated Annexation No . 51 to County Sanitation District No. 7 , subject to the following conditions : 1. Approval by a majority of the voters within the " territory to be annexed. 2. Payment by the landowners of the annexed territory of $828 per acre for the acreage involved, being the amount established as the standard annexation fee by action of the Board of Directors , being equal to the cost of rights of service and use of the existing treatment and outfall facilities of District No. 7 . 3. Payment of proponents of all engineering, legal, administrative and election costs incurred in processing the annexation, to be reimbursed from bond proceeds in the event of completion of annexa- tion. 4 . That the annexed territory shall be subject to the terms and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees or connection to the District facilities and use of said facilities . 5. The territory proposed to be annexed shall con- currently be annexed into the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts . 6. The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retire- ment of all existing and future bonds of the District as a whole. 7 . The formation of a new improvement district of Sanitation District No. 7 for the purpose of acquiring rights of service and use in existing facilities of said District No . 7 and for the purpose of constructing or acquiring major trunk lines to serve the area, comprised of the lands within the proposed annexation or such thereof as are found to be benefited pursuant to hearings had thereon by the District , such improvement district to be created concurrently with, and not separately from, the proceedings for annexation. a. The sum of money necessary to acquire appropriate rights of service and use in the existing treatment and outfall facilities of Sanitation District No. 7 in an amount equal to that set forth in Condition No. 2 . b. The sum necessary to provide those portions of the major trunk lines designated on the Sanitation District No. 7 Master Plan as Reaches 17 and 18 necessary to serve the area proposed to be annexed, less the proportionate amount thereof applicable to lands already within Sanitation District No. 7 which abut and would be served by any part of that system. C. The sums advanced to pay costs of annexation proceedings , being the amount referred to in Condition No. 3 thereof. 9. In exchange for the advance of the sums necessary for said Reaches 17 and 18, by the bond issue , each parcel of land in existence and of record as of the date of the election shall be entitled, at no further charge except as provided in Condition No. 12 hereof, to one connection to the sewer system of Sanitation District No. 7. 10. The District shall provide for contribution to the bond redemption fund established for the payment of the bonds of the improvement district of such amounts and from such sources as would be provided under the existing Sanitation District No. 7 policy of reimbursement relating to Master Plan sewers. 11. The annexation shall become effective only after the formation of the improvement district by the affirmative vote of a majority of those voting on the proposition and the authorization of the general obligation bonds by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of those voting on the proposition. 12. In addition to the connection charges required by Ordinance No. 716, of County Sanitation District No . 7 , those proper- ties receiving service by direct connection to the trunk sewer shall pay an additional connection service charge in an amount to be determined by the District . These monies shall, upon receipt , be applied for bond redemption. NOW i 11/3/76 ORANGE PARK ACRES ANNEXATION AND BONDS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY . Proposed Last Dates* BOND ELECTION PROCEDURE SCHEDULE 1976 Nov. 10 (1) District No. 7 adopts Res . Initiating Annexation and Setting Hearing (between 15(11/25/76) and 60(1/9/77) days after setting) . Nov. 30/ (2) Secretary - Publish Resolution or Notice once a week for Dec. 7• two weeks in a newspaper of general circulation within Dis- trict No. 7, first publication being at least 15 days prior to date fixed for hearing (Gov't. Code 6066, 56083) . Nov. 30 to Post Resolution or Notice on or near door of regular meeting Dec. 5 place at least 15 days prior to date fixed for hearing and remain posted at least 5 days (Gov't. Code 56085, 56086) . Nov. 30 Mail Resolution or Notice at least 15 days prior to date fixed for hearing (Gov' t. 'Code 56087, 56088) . (a) To all landowners within the territory proposed for annexation, as shown on the last equalized assessment roil (Gov'-t. Code 56089(e) , 56312(a)) . (b) To all persons , counties , cities , or districts which have filed written request for special notice with District Secretary (Gov' t. Code 56312(b)) . Dec. 16 (3) At hearing (which may be continued up to 60 days (2/14/77)) District No. 7 board may exclude unbenefited property (i.e. , land previously annexed) from either or both the annexed area/the improvement district after notifying LAFC (Gov't. Code 56315) . (a) A majority protest not withdrawn prior to the close of hearing terminates proceedings - either more than 50"/ of registered voters or more than 50% of the assessed value of 1977 land proposed for annexation (Gov't. Code 56316) . Jan. 5 (b) Absent a majority protest, the Board must, not later than 30 days (1/14/77)' after conclusion of Hearing, either disapprove the annexation or order annexation subject to confirmation of the voters (Gov' t. Code 56319.1, 56320, Rev. & Tax. Code 2260(2)) . Jan. 10 (4) Election, if called, to be held within the territory being annexed on the annexation question and within the improve— ment district on the bonds. Within 5 days after call, LAFC executive officer shall be notified by registered mail (Gov' t. Code 56119) . Jan. 12 (5) LAFC executive officer prepares an 'TmDartial Analysis' -of the propositions to be approved by LAFC and submitted to the officials conducting the election no less than 54 days (1/13/77) before the election (Gov't. Code 56119) . *NOTE: The dates specified represent substantially the last dates if election is to be held in March. Proposed .r Last Dates* 1977 Jan. 13 (6) Arguments for or against propositions must be filed at least 54 days before the election (Gov' t. Code 56120) . Feb. 22 Ballot Pamphlet mailed to each voter at least 10 days prior to election (Gov' t. Code 56122) . Feb. 11, Resolution Calling Election published once a week for 3 18, 25 weeks (Health & Safety Code 4785) . Mar. 3 (7) Election - Annexation - majority of votes cast. Bonds - 2/3rds of votes cast. Mar. 14 (8) Canvass of returns - Mar. 14 (9) District No. 7 Board declares by resolution votes cast on each proposition and confirms order of attachment. PUBLIC NOTICE RE ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA PROPOSED ANNEXATION BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56087, 56088, 56089(e) , 56312(a) s 56312(b) RESOLUTION 11110,7621*7 A RESOLUTION OF THE DOARD OF DIRECTORS INITIAT- ING PROCEEDING3 FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY, DETERI.tltlihO THE NEC[::ITY TO INCUR A CONDED INDEOTED;:ct:3 OF A PO;illC:l OF COC:r iY E.1.111TATION DISTRICT I;O.I OF O"C;;G�COU;r; /l*;D OF INTENTION TO F0 U I:.;?.'.OYI D;;;TP.;CT r;O.T•1 Ana FL'ua A TIME AND PLACE OF H CAMNO TNLRcON(ANNEXATION NO.61—ORANGE PARK ACRES) _ WHEREAS,the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County,State amount of the debt to be Incurred.Sald dale le not le+s the.,fifteen(15)days or more of California, has, by resolution no. 78,92. scooted July 14, 1976. approvo0 an than sixty(W)days from the date of adoption of this r-cowflon.Any Interacted application for the annexation of certain territory to this District pursuant to the portion Cushing to mere wimen p._•.:Sl c�airst sa;d cnnaxallon shall do so by provislons of law• and has da3ignated this District as the District to condu(.t written communication filed with the Sucrelary of the Board not later ban the hour annexation proceedings pursuant to law:and sot for hearing. WHEREAS,pursuant to such resolution,certain terms and conditions were A written protest by a landowner shall contain a description sufficient to proposed to b3 Impo-cd Including the lormation of an Improvement district and the Incientlty the Ir nd owned by him;a protest by a voter shall contain the tosldential authorization of 1.znoral obliCafion bonda thcrcol; address of such vofor. NOVI,THEREFORE.THE BOARD OF DIR!-CT0R9 OF COUNTY SANITATION 16.At the time and place fixed for hearing,any"raon Inlereeted,Including DISTRICT NO.7,DOES HER`DY FIND,DETEr I'AfNE AND ORDER,cs follcvis: all persons owning property In ins District or In the propp:ad Imorovom3nt d:slrlct, 1.A resolution(No.76-517)of tppucLtion for the cnncxetion of tomtory was may cpp=.r rind prot.3l the inclup!on of his prep.ny within the Cropp-.^d adopted by this Eotrd of Directors on March 10. 1978, commencing such Improvenwnt district,andlor present any other matter material to trio questions sot proce,oding3. forth In this re.oiutan. 2. The distinctive short form designation assignees by the Locci Agency 17.Tha Secretary o1 the Board Shall provide for notice of such hcaing by Formation Commission to the territory prcposcd 10 b3 annoxod is Annexation No, publication of tl;la ro3olullon once a weak for two suc='aive weeks,with at i.'_Zt 51 (No.76.1)to County Sanitation District No. 7, the description of trio exterior five(5)days lntcrvaning bolwoGn the ruapcctive publication dafos,not couni:rig 'boundaries of such terrilory Wing set forth on Exhibit"A",attached hereto and such public tlon dales In the Tustin Kswts, a now3pz!)ur o1 ganorol clrculei.on made a part hereof by roference. within the elfoctcd District and County,Said publication to be commenced at 13.,at 3.The territory proposod to be annexed Is Inhabited is ouch term Is defined In fifteen(15)dzys prior to tha date sp_cilird herein for heanng. Division 1 of TIIIo 6 of tho Government Code. 18.1he Sceralary chill lurihw esuca notice of such ho3ring by posting a copy <.The reason for the proper,ad annexation as eat forth In the proposal thereof of this reaolut!on on or n,2r the deer of Ins meeting place of this Gaud, --!id Is to provide Sanitary Sower earvicezt to Said territory cs requested by the Orange posting to b3 commenced ca load lift._n(15)days prior 1p V a Cate Spoc!lied hi re.n Park Acres Association. for hearing Intl continue to tho time of said h�.rinq.A copy of Bald resolution a:-.at1 5.Iris forms and conditions sot forth In Exhibit "B",attached hereto and (unhor be po.tcd In Ihre3 (3) public placos w;inin the propo3od improvUmJrit Incorporated herein,and eppticeDle to the propos_d annexation. clalrict at Icasl two wooks before the time fixed for said hearing. 6.Proceadln92 are hereby Initiated for the annoxation to this District of the 19.Said Secretary shall also give mailed notice of such noaring at least(151• terrllortoo dcaenbed In said Exhibit"A". days prior to the data thereof as specified herein,to all landownors owning Nano 7.Punutnl to Seellon 4743 01 ttio Health end Safety Coda,and the order of within the territory proposed to be annoxcd,Sdcronsed to such person to v.aom this Doard,and following notico end hccrin;th_rron,this Coard ha duly adopted land within said forrltory is e3se3sad as bnown upon the Iasi oauc;tzed cos^asrr.ent an Enginoer's R.port•by reaolutiro no,7Crl47.7,Caled Au^,uot 11,1978. roil of the County of Orange.or such per3on's raCress r.3 shown upon such roll,or &Pursuant to Scctlon t;,, It^,3 of the H" h and Safety Coda.this Board hereby where any such parson is no longer tha ownar, than aJ0103300 to er.y pc;,son determines that It is r.ec:,sssrY to incur Wnctd IrZ;D:ednCe3 to obtain h nu'a wttn entitled to lr3 shown as ownor on the next m,as_sm_m rcu,or wnoro land is euc.ect \� which to acquire the rinhts end pro;c^rty rnd to do Ih3 v:o(k ssl forth in the mpurt to a recorded written tar,:cmcnt of =;.1,1, ti�n i:Ira:;T7 to Pw Corson Lh✓:;n and dosc0WPd In the atia:rcJ terms and conditions tExh;Dil"B"). therein 113 purchaser and adare3aed to any public ty=ncy ovining lano within said 9.The penaral ODj&ct3 and purposss for wnien the prcpozed d-bt Is to l:e 'le(ntory,and to all persons and counties,cities or districts,whicii shall thotaiotute Incurred Is Wa aequtsrtlon or ri his of c:nice end u.3 of the existing tmalment and hLvo filud a written roquest for Special notic3 with -.id £,crufury, or with tho outfall facilities of District No. 7, and for v`3 eurpo:as of 01.3 acquisition or construcCon of mcJor trunk hri s,I:;clhtlos and c:;purtrriancos to carve lna portion County Asspcopysor, pursuant of Sxtion S:iA3 of the Gavaid. in Ludo, pa. of me District rithin raid ppnr iz.tlon No. 51 1t:d. 7�.-1), red Ira •-aci3lt:o o doposlting a copy of lids resolution, first class, gestapo prepaid, In trio United aassmant_,righ 3 of vroy trio ether prcp.riy or s4ruciurc;n;,cu3tsary or cen% n7sni Elates malls. therefor,to;,9thsr with all costs and estimated co Its mcicantai to or connocted with PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular mooting hold November 10,1976. the acqulsltlore,construction.Improving or financing of the project. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 10.That the amount of debt to be incurred Is;1,G25,OA.00. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF 11.That this Board Intends to form an imcirovc'mant district of that portion of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA the District find of Annexation No.51(No.7111)which,In the opinion of this Board, will to benefited,the exterior Wundana3 of Anlch propoeod Improvement district J.Wayne Sylvester are act forth on a map entitled"Annexation No.7&1 to County Sanitation District Secretary No.7;'which map Is on till with this Board and Shall govern for all details a3 to the Publish:The Tustin News extent of the proposed Improv..mont cistrict. 12.That should the prc,;•oe--,d ann3xatlon be approved,this Board Intends to Nov.25 3 Dec.2,1976. Cal)an election In Such Improvcmpnt district on a date to M fixed,for the purpose of submitting to the qualiflW voters thereof• the proposition of incurring an Indebtedness by the issuance of bonds of Ina District for",d improvement district. 13.That taxes for the payment of said bonds and the interest thereon shall be derived exclusively from an annual tax upon the real property within the Improvement district, provided, however. that the D!Strict shall provide for Contribution to the bond redemption fund ostabilshod for the payment of such bonds of such amounts and from such sources cs would be provided under existing County Sanitation District No.7 policy of ralmouroomenl relating to master plan sewers. 14.That the Engineers Report,together with a map Showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed Improvement district with rotation to the territory Immediately contiguous thereto and to the propo--'d Improvements,are on file with afro District Board and are evcllable for Inspection by any person interested. 15.That Thursday,the 16th day of Dacomoor,1976,at Ins hour of 8:00 O'Clock P.M.,at Fire ShAlon No.23. 90;`0£antlego Eoulevard, Vli!a Park.California. are hereby fixed as the time and place for a hearing by trio Board on the proposed annexation and on the quc3lion of the formation of the proposed Improvement district,the extent thereof, the proposed acquisition and Imorovnmcnt "this. ' t S t MHNT"A" MiefT s" ANNEXATION NO.M1 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 ANNEXATION NO.91(NO.Mill, AN that certain land situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO,7 Orange,State of California,more peritcululy described as follows: PARCEL 1: TEAMS AND CONOrnONS . Beginning at a pant in the boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 sa 1.Approval by a maWly of'tho voters within the territory to be annexed. established by"Annexation No.30,"said point being trio Northwest corner of said 2.Payment by the landowners of the annexed ienrtory,of SR2i3 per acre for the annexation,said comer also being a point in the existing boundary lineal the City Of acreage Involved,being the amount eatabitshoi tie the standard annexation five by Crap"as established by"Annexation No.231"; action of the Board of Directors,being equal to the cost of n�;hts of service and use Thence In a general Southerly. Easterly and Northerly direction along the of the existing treatment and outfall facilities of District No.7. boundary fine of said Gountr Senn tion District No. 7 and along said existing 3.Payment Of proponents of all tinulncenng,to, administrative and election boundary,line of trio City of Orange through Courses 1 through 3 to the Nonheny cools Incurred In processing the annexation,to Do reimbursed from bond proceeds terminus of that certain course desenOW as"S.4'18'45"E..548-2 fddt,more of In the event of completion of annexation. Mee" In sold existing boundary line Of ins City of Orange as ea laJelaiied by 4.That the annexed territory shall be subject to the terms and conditions of all "Annexation No.231": ordinances pernalninQ to foes or connection to the District facilities and use of said Thence leaving s..ld existing boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 facilities. and Continuing along sz,J existing tounc:,ry line of the City cl Orloce in a general 5.The territory proposed to be annexed shall concurrently be annexed Into the Easterly and Northerly O.rict,on thruu,h Cources 4 and 5 to a point in trio Ix)unOery 7th and 70h Sewer MaIntonanco UislOcts. line of County Saniletic-n D-strict No.7 as dntcollehed by"Annexation No.32"and a 6. Thy territory, upon annexation, 6hall ba subject to ell ad valorem taxes point In the center line of Santiago Canyon Road; required for the retlrurnent of all existing end future bonds of the District rs a whole. Thence leaving said existing ooundary line of the City of Orange and 7.The formation of a n..w Imptovom•nt Osuirict of;.rdtttion Dieir!ct No 7 for continuing along said Dauncary tine of County Sanitation Dsstriet No. 7 Its the purpose of aeoulrtng rights of service and ure In ex!^tin3 ft.citt4,s of ►aid salabllshod by Annexation No. 2' In a general Southeasterly and Northerly District No.7 and for the purhoee at constructing or u.quiring rnsjor Irur.:,linos to direction through Ceum--s 6 and 7 to trio SOLtheny termint•e of that cdrt6m course serve the area.COmpriped of the lerids'wilnin the prori;L d arnexation or such described as"S.3'49 E..2:0.24 fe"i"In slid existing boundary line of the City of thereof as are found to tru b,netitod pursuant to heartn;! hoc thrre-on by the Orange soe3tablished0)"Annoxst,on No.231"; District, such improvoment district to Ce ereattA concurrently *tin. and not Thenr-o eonlnula3 along said boundary fire of County Saait0lon District NO, separately from,the DfOCoadings for anrexation. 7 and along said exislle;boundary line of the City Of Orrmre in a reneval Non!,erlr 8.The approval by trio valeta Of sold improvement district(at an o!ecticn held and Easterly direction t:.rot:gn Coa•ratss 8 and 8A t0 trio Southerly terminus Of b1Ct ggricurrently with end not septrsteiy from tho oiactfon on the annexation)of Vuneral certain bourse descrIbW as"S.0.23'04"W.,607.88 feel"In Bald"Annexation No. obligation bonds determined by the Bald S2n!lation Oi-trict NO.7 to be sufficient, 32"; with applicable Incidental expenses,to pay the following: Thence leaving said boundary line of County Sanitation District No. 7 and continuing along said exiting boundary line of the City of Orange 63 established by a The sum of money necessary to acquire sporophate rights of Bald"Arnr xation No.:':1"tc,ou;n Courses 9 through 33 to a p:int in the Nortnorsy service and use In the existing froatmant and outfal! facial Ws of boundary lies of County Sanitation District NO.7 as c3lac!ahad by"Annexation NO. Sanitation District No.7 In an amount equal to that sal forth In Con. 27",gild point being tr•a Southcny torminus of that certain course described sa dition No.2. "South 791.41 tool"In as,d aasting boundary line of tha City of Orange: b.The sum necessary to provide thoto portions of the major Thence conlinuir.;along sa,d existing boundary line of the City Of Orange as trunk linos designated on the Sanitation Clslrict No.7 master plan sstablish.ad by"Anner:.ticn No.255"and by"Annoxetion No.21>9"and along raid ea A"Chea 17 and 18 neco3er,ry to c'rve the tras proposed to be existing bound:ry of Cc.nty Sarilauon District No.7 es belaufiahed by"Annexation annexed,loss rho proporllonslo amount thereof a7pt!cs:rio 10 lands No.27"In a 1Vesiorly 6,,e bon along Courso 34 a distance of ll,!JX2 feat; already within Sanitation Dillrict No.7 which ecul and would b0 Thence laayln^t e.d existing WunOary of County-anrtallon District No.7 and served wavy part 11 that system. :strlc Continuing along seed v xistln;bout.L, ly line of the City of OranO6 ea 63U-01i5h ic!by sAld"A 1. N �; _ir�a Carib''1 ionri, q `\�steri end`out,criy itecu,n a.The sums ecivanced to pay costs of annexation proceedings, along C Curses f�uni�r u lllrc4wh a/(a a c,>7XI ins d�cun�ry�nn o�c aor.ty being the amount raferred to In Condition No.3 thereat. Sanitation District No_7 as Oslabu,nael by"Annexation No.7"; 9.In Tr,once conuncin�along a;Z oxisting boundary Ilse of the City of O=9,3 asexChsn e 9 for the advance of the eu:ris necessary far-,Aid P,eeehes 17 and established by "Anhoxsnon No. 2.35" and tlong a,::0 boundary fine of County 18,by the bond Issue,each parcel of land In cN!eten::d and of reLord as of I"Oslo of Sariltation•District No_7 in a Westerly direction along Course 53 a distance at 6=.61 the election shall be entitled,at no further crier„a exceor Fs orovio".d In Conallion feet; No.12 hereof,to one connection to the sewer sy'tem Of dan!;alion Uislrict No.7. Thence leaving said boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 and 10.The District shall provide for eontribulIon to tni bard re izmctlon fund Continuing along sai.-Iertsting boundary line of the City of OrLng3 as established by established for the payment of the bonds of the improvr rnent district Of such said"Annexation No.235"and e.'0"Annexation No.253"In a general Nonheny, n� nI fro e n to,irchs rs would D ;Ovid;.un''r the existing C--nnation �i�a r C o. policy��rcim;;(L,,non,ror..,n�.0 a:a_i...p- .L,..irs. Westerly and Southerly direction through COurea3 Z)d through 52 to a point In trio it.The Annexation shell bucome a:f"Ilee only aft.: Tha fo!mallOri of Ihq existing boundary line of County Sane;atson District No. 7 a3 established by an Improvement district by the stfirmative vote Of a c;,-.,.:nty at thcea voting on I" "Exclusion"adcated by Orange County Board of Supervisors per Resolution No.Of- prociositlon and the authorization of the conOr;l obi:gatson_bends by the affirmative 93detcd January25,t:Sl _ + , vote of two-thirds of those voting on the.ropozitlon. Thoncu!;,.Tang e-;J uxlali,.g bDundrry lino of the City cf O'tn;o In a generfd 12.Ire addition lu the connecctoh eriarges requtraU by Ordinance No.716,cf Southwesterly direct? along Sera existing boundary Ilns of County Srnitation County Sanitation District No. 7 those propartsaa receiving, xdrvlea Dv dtrsct District No.7 as estaw:sned by taid Resolution No.61-63 tnd by an'Excluc+On" connection to the trunk sewer shall pay an tac:ucr.a!conneouarl service charge In adopted by said Boa;,j of Supervisors-Decumbur 17. 1':. cssignalod ca,Orange an amount to lie Determined by the District.These monies snail,upon receipt,be' Park Acres - A on o:^s 1d) th-cugh Courses 53 through 64 to the Southerly applied forbon0redemption. prolongation 43 of Misc;i lanoous Milos,Records of said County; - Then:e leaving said existing boundary of County Sanitation District No. 7 along Bald Southerly prcioncatiori and Westerly line Of Trzct No.918 through the following bearings and cistances(course numbers designated as 65 through 71):N. 1'51'E.,850.93 feet; Thence N.7.17'20"W.,1039.02 feet; Thence N.53.42'W.,213.70 fact; Thence N.87.33'K.829.i'J feet; Thence N.18*OC'20"W.,1416 14 feet: Thence N.0.40'50"W.,337.96!set; Thence N.50'?Cr 30"E.,333.87 feet to an angle point In the existing boundary line of the City of Orange as astao isneyd try"Annexation No.191",said angle point being the SDulhwesteny,terminus of that certain course described as"N.72.12' 30"E,6Q..^3 irat"In 3.ttd anroxation. Th3nca In a general NOrthr:.starty direction along said existing boundary line of the City of Orange as estacnshad by said"Annexation No.19l",by"Detachment No.16i1-A",by said"Anrexation No. 191",and by"Annexation No.228"throu0n Courses 72 through 95 to a point in the boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7,raid point being trio Norttwest Comer of"Annexation No.31". . 171ence leaving said existing pounaary line of the City of Orange and along a"boundary line ct County Ssn,tatlon Diatrlct No. 7 as 6staDlisned by acid "Annexation No. 31" to a car901 Southerly. Easterly and Northerly direction through Courses 96 tfuough 9d to the Northeast comer of said"Annexation NO.31", esld corner being a-point In said existing boundary line of tits City of Orange as established by said"Annexation No.228"; Thence leaving said boundary line of County Sanitation District No.7 and along said existing boundary line of Ins City of Orange as established by said "Annexation No.228"In a general mannerly and Easterly direction through Courses 1119 and 100 to the Port of Beginning, The above parcel of land contains 537.79 acres,more or des. PARCEL 2: Beginning at a point In the boundary line of Coun':y Sanitation District No.7, esld point Wing Ina Northwest corner of an"Exclusion"adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors-December 17,JVd(designated as Oranca Putt Acres •T on Page 13).sald Northwest corner also being a point In the Westerly line of the land deeeAbad in a deed recorded In Book 276%Page 150 of Official Records of said County of Orange; Thuni,s along said bounce y fins of County Sanitation 7 :.& established by said"Exclusion"through trio following coutses: o _ -- E.. 404.64.)1aat; Thence S.48.24.40"E..57.70 feet-, Thence S.TV 24'40"E..96.35 test, Thence N.0.00'40"W..470.00 feel: Thence S.65.44'10"W.,150.37 feet to the Point of Baglnning. The above parse,Of land Contains 1.41 acres,more or tees. All references to course ntmtors within this description ate to Course numbers es shown on the map assigned"Annaaalton No.7b/to County Sanitation District No. 7".The use of said course numbers is to facilitate comparing this dascAptlon to the map. i�� TELEPHONES. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $h AREA CODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA i 9 96 6 2-2 2-2 4 D 11 P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1DH44 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) December 10, 1976 Milton Garrett 20212 Amapola Avenue Orange, CA 92669 Reference: AP 379-212-01 Proposed Annexation and Sanitary Sewer - Orange Park Acres Area With reference to your letter dated December 8th, we have projected an estimated cost for Sanitary Sewer Service for your 2 1/2 acreage parcel of $11,617. Our records indicate the assessed value of your property is $24,800. We have used the projected costs outlined on the goldenrod sheet entitled 1'SUNU�LNRY OF SANI- TARY SEIYER COSTS" which accompanied the notice to all property owners dated November 24th. The improvement district cost for your parcel over the next 15 years will total $5,617, while the assessed district cost is estimated to be $5,280 and the on-site building sewer cost is $750. If one were to use the tax rates for the improvement bonds, which are listed on the back side of the goldenrod sheet, the improvement district costs will be considerably less for your property. If you wish any additional information, please call the undersigned. Fred Harper General Manager FH:kr 1 0 J. R. ELPERS, M.D. U NTY O F HEALTH OFFICER *4WO SANTA ANA OFFICE o RANG E 645 NORTH ROSS STREET TELEPHONE: 834-3131 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, California 92702 HEALTH AGENCY December 15, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District #7 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: Please find ecnlosed a copy of "A Survey of Individual Sewage Systems - Orange Park Acres" dated February 25, 1972 and a copy of the addendum to the report dated April 11, 1972. In reviewing the information contained in the report, I find that the facts remain unchanged. In addition, our service reports of individual sewage disposal system pumpouts tend to confirm that a continuing prob- lem exists in this area. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, Har�'Schroth Environmental Health Engineering Specialist Division of Environmental Health HGS/sc enc. �'6 A SURVEY OI INDIVIDUAL. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS Orange :'ark Acres County of Orange California January - February, 1972 DATE: February 25, 1972 REQUESTED BY: Orange County Planning Department 'CONDUCTED BY: John E. Haines, R.S. Environmental. Health Specialist Andrew Pearson Assistant Environmental Health Sanitarian Richard Grudzinski Assistant- Environmental Health Sanitarian Water Quality Control Section i Division of Environmental Health Orange County Health Department REPORT WRITTEN BY: Harlan G. Schroth, R.S. Environmental Health Engineering Specialist Orange County Health Department- SUT`irfARY OF FINDINGS: During the months of January and February, 1972, the Orange County Health Department conducted a survey of individual sewage system conditions in Orange Park Acres, an unincorporated area of Orange County. The' survey consisted of personal interviews with residents, field observations and a review of all available individual sewage disposal pumping records, soil maps, well logs and both chemical and bacteriological sampling of domestic well water and suspected sewage overflows. The findings of the survey are summarized as follows: 1. A review of geological information of the Orange Park Acres area indicates that sub-surface soils are variable in composition. As. a result, the percotative capacity of the sub-soils varies from one sub area to another, ranging from very poor in 65% of .the area, marginal in 30% and good in 5%. 2. In some sections of the area, the variable surface topography adds to the problem -of poor soil infiltration characteristics, making these areas entirely unsuitable for the disposal of sewage effluent. 3. Reports from commercial sewage pumpers, submitted to the Health Department, show that during the past three (3) years, fifty (50) systems have been pumped, with seven (7) of these requiring two or more pumpings within a period of one hundred twenty (120) days. WOW 4. . Interviews with 143 of the 300 homeowners in the area indicate a system failure rate of 16% over the most recent five year period. Also, 297 of the persons interviewed admitted to having their system pumped out at least once since installation. 5. During- the field survey, two sewage disposal. systems were observed to be overf lowing. 6. Currently, no soil borings or percolation tests are required by the Depart- ment of Building and Safety prior to the issuance of a permit for the con- struction of an i.ndivi.dual sewage disposal system. CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATIONiS: Orange Park 4cres area is generally not well suited for disposal of sewage by indivi- dual systems.. This is evidenced by the recent history of disposal system failures and the very 101•7 soil infiltration rates exhibited in 65% of the area. Since much of the developed and developable land lies within this area, it is our opinion that sewage disposal system failures will continue, even if no further development occurs, and will increase in frequency in proportion with future development. It 'is, therefore, recommended that the necessary steps be initiated to provide alter- nate means of. sewage disposal in the areas of poor infiltration characteristics. The most obvious alternative is, of course, to provide sanitary sewers. However, if expense is no object, elaborate, well-engineered individual. systems, uti.lizi-ng advanced techniques such as soil replacement and evapo-transpiration, might _possibly function in.such areas. The chances of success are not too great. It is further recommended that if individual sewage disposal systems are permitted in the future, they be approved only on the following conditions: 1. That, prior to issuance of a building permit, a log of soil borings and results of percolation test be submitted to the Department-of Building and Safety for evaluation on each lot for which an application is made. The aforementioned percolation test should be performed and reported by a Registered Sanitarian, Registered Civil or Sanitary Engineer, Registered Geologist or Registered Engineering Geologist. , 2. That each proposed individual disposal system be designed by a Registered Civil or Sanitary Engineer or Engineering Geologist. 3. That the proposed building site not be less than one acre. 4. Tha--t an additional percolation system, equal to 100% of the original design capacity, be constructed and connected at the time of original construction. 5. That means be provided -for assured routine preventive maintenance of such systems, such as by the formation of a septic tank maintenance district. DISCUSSION: Scope of Investication The Health Department cgnducted a survey of individual sewage disposal systems con- ditions in Orange Park Acres community, an unincorporated area in Orange County-. This area is located in T4S, R9W, Sections 13, 14, 23, 24, 25 and 26. The survey was con- ducted during the months of January and February, 1972, and consisted of the folioclir�g investigations: . -3- 1. A. house to 11UIISC survey was conducted to detect existing sewage ovefl.ows anc'_ homeoaaers were interviewed to determine the history of sewage system purapings and failures. �.r 2. Available geological data on sub-surface soil and water conditions was reviewed. •3. Interviews were held with personnel of the Orange County Water District, Orange County Flood Control District, U. S. Geological Survey Office, Orange County Building Department and the Orange Park Acres Mutual Water Company. 4. All available Health Department pumping records for septic tanks, seepage pits and cesspools in the area were reviewed. 5. Samples from water i..clls and suspected sewage overflows were collected for chemical and bacteriological analysis. Background of the Area The community of Orange Park Acres northern boundary begins at the western portion of the Sully-14iller sand and gravel operation and follows Santiago Creek to Villa Park Dam, The eastern boundary begins at Villa Park Dam and continues south through the Villa Parl; Dam Regional .Park site to Chapman Avenue. The southern boundary proceeds west- along Chapman Avenue to Newport Avenue, southeast along Newport Avenue, approximately 2000 feet to the southern range of h'i.l.1s, following the ridge line West- erly to a point where the hills intersect Chapman Avenue. The western boundary begins at Chapman Avenue and proceeds north following the ridge of the hills to Santiago Creek. In 1929, a deep water well was drilled near Santiago Creek in T4S, h9W, Section 27, and the Orange Park Acres Mutual Water Company was formed to serve the area. With v:ater piped in, Orange Park Acres was divided into parcels of land for orchards. Homes were established in some of the groves. In the late 1940's and early 1950's, chicken :anchcrs began to establish operations in the area that threatened the continued existence of the pastoral setting. As a result, residents in the late 1950's, working in conjunction with established poultrymen, obtained one acre minimum lots (there are some one-half acre lots), single family residence zoning in most of the area to maintain a desirable balance between residen- tial and ranching activities in the community (Ord. No. 685, passed by the Board of Supervisors on March 9, 1954, designated the area E4-1 acre minimum lots). The number of residents doubled in the decade of the late 1960's. At the present time, there are approximately 300 families living in the area. Currently, twelve (12) new homes are under construction in the area. Many owners are subdividing their land and offering one, two, and three acre parcels for sale. Since most lots in the area are large (one acre) , the Orange County Department of Building and Safety does not require that percolation tests or soil borings be made in advance of construction of individual sewage disposal systems. The "rule of thumb" applied is a septic tank, plus one seepage pit per bedroom. In other words, it is assumed that a leaching area can be depended upon to dispose of sewage effluent regardless of the physical properties of the soil. i r -• • • Veol.o and SON. Ch racLcrisLi.cs n'he h3.gher cl.evati0ns i.n the area consist mainly of non-percolative sedimentary rocks which consist of san(Istone, shale, and silts Lone; including some volcanic rocks and rocks older titan Tcrt.3.ary. ' Igj�er el.evati.ons Cxhi.b3.t: stream terrace deposits of late pleistocene and older 111J1lv5.a)" depot 3 is conr,lSt:ino of semiconsoli.dated silt, sand, gravel. and rubble having water bcar.inY capabi.)Jt4cs. --Soils found z+l.ong Santi-a.zo Creek consists 'of semiconsoliclated si.l.t, sand and ravel having a M3 h inf.i.lAralion capabil.i.ty of greater than two inches (2") per hour. Soils of this! type, arc, found in approximately five percent (5%) of the area. Else-- where, approxa.mately th3.rty percent (30%) of: the study area consists of older alluvial deposits of semiconFoJ.3.datcd silt, clay, sand and gravel which have a medium infil.tra- tion rate of one inch 0.") to two inches (2.") per hoar. The remainder of the area, Appro:;31natcl.y :Nty-f.ive percent (65%) consists of consolidated sandstone, shale and sM.t;tonc. This Soil. type exhibits_ very poor infiltration characteri.stic.s, less than one inch (I") per hour. (Sec Plate I, Soil Infi.l.tr.ati.on Characteristics) ' Soils ill which the infiltration rate is less than two inches (2") in one hour are 'vnsuitabl.e for. seepage. pits and rates slower than one inch (1") per hour are unsuit- eble for any type of soil absorption sewage effluent disposal. system. Therefore, Areas exhibi.ting tllc.. aforementioned infiltration characteristics should not be developed unless suitable t:lternate disposal facilities are available. petalled information on ground water characteristics in the area was not readily avail- We during the perl.od that the survey was conducted. It was established that- most Of the water wells are s11.11.1.0w water table wells. The drilled depths of the wells ..i range between fifty feet (50' ) to one hunclred feet (100' ). Along Handy Creek near the southern boundry of the area, the static water level. is approximately thirty feet (30' ). - -Along Santiago Creek -the -static water level is approximately sixty feet (601 ). Field Survey of Existing. Individual Sevave Disposal stems. A house to house survey was conducted and homeowners were interviewed to gather data on the history of disposal system failures and make observations for evidence of any faulty systems. A system failure is defined as the inability of the disposal system to function prcperl:y 4:ithout clogging and the resultant overflowing conditions. One hundred and forty- three (143) of the approximately three'llundred _(300) homeo�,-ners in the area were interviewed. All of the homes were visited but over half of the residents were not at home. The data below represents the results obtained from the interviews conducted during the survey and 11calth Department records: 1. Forty-tcro (42) persons, or twenty-nine percent (29%) of those interviewed, edniitted to at least one pumping since their disposal system was installed. v H0-icvcr, when pressed they were vague regarding the exact number of times the system had been pumped and the time lapse between pumpings. 2. :• Twenty- three (23) persons, or sixteen perocent (16%) of those interviewed, ..i reported leaching system failures withina five year period. Information was not giver► during the interviews indicating the occurence of more than one failure. 3. A rc�lcw of Health U:,pzirtment pumping records indicates that of the -1prroxiriately tlirec. hundred 'homes in the area . f.orty-onc (41) , thirteen Percent (137.) of Lbe indi.vi.dual sewage disposal. systems, had one pumping .. during the years of 1970 and 1971. u. During the field inv-ostigat.ions two system failures w're observed, as evidenced by the overfl�owinc, of sewo-e effluent from the leach,i.ng systems. `r.. Of the approximately 300 homeowners in Orange Park Acres, .157, or about fifty-six percent (56%) of the total, were not at .home or unavailable 'for intCrviewing during the survey. Durin€, the lnfcrviews, the residents in' general were uncooperative when we attempted to elicit information about- their sewage disposal. systems-. There iias a. pervasive feeling .among residents that the survey would accelerate incorporation into the City of Orange, resulting in zone clianoes which would destroy the present rural atmosphere. -Many of the persons interviewed were house%i.ves, who in most cases had little know- ledge about their sewage disposal systems. There was complete agreement, among all persons interviewed, that homeox..ners relied entirely upon cesspool pumpers to avoid sewage overflows when problems arc-first noted. During the survey there were two homes where sewage was observed overf.l.ol•:ing from the leaching lines due .to a system failure. The most frequent complaint made by the residents- of the 23 homes reporting system failures, was that the permeability of the soil is poor, which causes oversaturation of the leaching lines and seepage pits. In addition, they encountered problems with their disposal systems not f_unctioni.ng properly due to rain water infiltration during the rainy season. ; Chemical and. bacteriological analyses of the eight :O) water wells in the area were performed in an attempt to establish what effect, if any, .the sub-surface disposal of sewage has upon the quality of the underground water in tbt; area. The results of the analyses are pending; therefore, no data is available at this time. However, we will continue to investigate this problem and the findings will be reported at a later date. v ORANGE PARK ACRES SOIL INFILTRATION CHARACTERISTICS le 14 LEGEND , �--� F- En- Orange Park Acres Community Boundary Lines High Infiltration. Rate (Greater than 2.0 inches/hour) ALI Medium Infiltration Rate (1.0 to 2.0 inches/hour) Low Infiltration Rate (Less than 1.0 inches/hour) Water Well a ,1 t•I♦b4'1•,r Y•. .r"{:"iA•\I.5l.Y.ia.ra•r►r -✓✓w•aYw/4•r'J'•..W'•'..• -Y.••••�.ran r, N-MW.`�.r.r • n. , t S • ''�'_ • J �' r f �;,> 'r 1 �;' `', / y' ORANGE OtlatiUNITY, . 1:1 PARK ACRES C of 4 1• • BOUNDARY LINES -- t � •.\_Ise �_ /j; �. ",._b. •./•'�a� pop_ ' ' • �^'�•''b�%' �4� •Y�'�- • `.' •i\� .. • ,fir f � e, 1 ( rrr \___..- ��-. ` /� ✓, O a � ' �' �.,,•.Jp :!\./"' `1:•-.�i.-',�.�,;11\,:�, ..������. \ \����f•''�.t� ..•-i- .;,�f��'�0,, �it'JiJ'��,; �Z�S�/1-'•�/J�,�I:`r ,..Ir �•1��� , _ , .% • i IN, ..-i, A,V -.. .J •L q, lC.;;•{ !r_i�•'.i b ��:,�r �j ',11'V�`'�• f�1\t ' " ti 1. ,-rs �y�` \ •� �� aff v � ¢ f ,8 �� �'�_�� ; ° �•' � •.� O� 'Qa \_� h` _ G )I�,: 7�1 r i�Sh•l�ti} � J +f.� t� \ •tK 1 ; 40! !� .a: 3aao. {�✓ ! �!..4`',/°__'.r,l �'' \ �. ,�8001 I.� ...Z``(S,� ,\v•;�. •0 1 ` I� d6p_� a �.✓� l' .i�v'Y g �} •'_. j�rl(:t;•> k;>\�l d1'l .rr.--_....�....-.t.•.Y. { � , I/��•�� �,.. � `\`�A�9: (P�){��„k" ^ �;7\[1 011e ,(�� I \ � • \� \J pj t� { a • :.. :-;,r" —� -Gravel Plj of a ,�a� ;3 (rl/)(rIJS ,✓`n �'ti4,.; ••s 3 9t P`'�-� O/ /`7 {12,- •. '..•�1 f• u\.,; ; i r am` �: •"•- „ �: , (•' -t� N_ :lip � '0• '1.� (^">�� .• �`•� Y � ��^ r tl j •ROAP. _ 's l.�i •36Jr /p/ /. ./_" i q: 4;VI `ram;^'•'\ � .,,�.-''��\ � 1 f-_ ,. :,r f r{,�•�1,(�, :. (`�• i.;j•• i ao• ,r!!': 'F!' %-,..'/„y"$ ,��ll/v��� ��•A�rl/ _� 1 / �!/�(~ , r� i`• V : �,�✓ { c l;��%� 1 Villa Park 16 / `� ('1' l/ jr • / l�� ' l '{r \C i /•:,s ', ,�' f' ` ' /NGCN•S ••t• ,Vj •/ -1 sch j r, tt t r t `L�t� �T s'r i•,, r� � if p • rya 0 ( 4''4'�f�f/J• 1 l ' ) ({, f�`' (� l j"� t u. i t``y'� - : - !!• `J �pp � �\��1,..����ti `v�60�f\•�I J ��/ ( 111� �� l ` "Kj' /' a (� i,i ■ 1.• J'�j•. • • - ,� j` ��j�`1��.�y'��1� � r i a' (// � (J`S• i •• ' i `�. 1 ! i�1� "� '�1 /��/ � { U M• .1 ./�7��•l l/ t � i�1� �\ f'ry •�f•• � ' '•� ..... asaaar raraer aP r'ta m - �( ({�f�•:�, ..........a4 •/ � a (\J) •-J 1 f •..a � _ s. � , `\J!1 �, - \ \ If rl � �4 � . � t!L.!r�,l'/'/yam 1• •p��\ r' ,_� //'�� —••„i is /� '\ - C�� l.�l-�'.�.�`__ _� n\�: .-J \ a>` \�.:r' / 1.,. �:���5 �a g•r • '�� 1. (tlopr'iyavc{ ..... `. r _�� � �� )l�!\-,((. i� �`eo�\``-. ,.p \ •r ',/f C �'• �•� �� ] ..-••'. i r(.r' F"� _ 9ONO AVE - _�..%j� ./i�r_✓� .1,,. `IL •c ��`�y •o ,•J i,.,ram• (((�////, •'�' ��,' \r_ �a'\\ \ I;��� :� \ I+e 1Rvt� �"• ( _ - ` � ' %li�1JS �/' }j��' �Ir '•a-ss--..... p � 'ef•� / \ /\-'\ 7�. �\�\OR�-.-'�+�' PARK .3 a `\�\�$ �J��/(f,\ z / '�,. .�i �\ �---� \,.. \ a.� ✓ .�� , j r 1 ,ltl \ +_IavrAtE • a_ �t r �\ i •u`If _\ !\�i%r tl�.rl�l� 1. D 't ' ��—; a � �:: \ ` \ it ✓f / a ,\ \ �/ —'�4 a 3 .��.� V/f% $,�4 �� ! , 1 '� c •: r 57a F. • - = i/i��. / k`�h,N'/l�1� V% �• >.^6� �2,� .Li•�`i a, .;r 1 1 G r! �. :l� j •sue fU �'� 313 . f:/(%�j. l. ��'1� ', •• •�.i ,.�z's3 ,--- NN( `r ?�``':*� \\a.! a. �I11 r a � '\ •��\•. \ \ , s9,���� ,' • I �\ — ./•I , a -1���"�.�/J'r11,•Y ,_:�14.�a: / ''' /!� \ 4 �•b"�~• \\��\.'�.j � �•/>!�' i :� _cb �.�>'•lrul/ 'J �' r rli Sf �" 're`/ �.. 4 I i \ ,°•a K =?1r,{•� i K. 1' !!.1�\l�i••�i•f .. \.. "+_.b N/ �il. \ l �-t„✓' ..•,ram...y... / - `{. '' 1•`.n l b_ }+ y. t.'� :'r.; t '�•t:'r !�• gM:.05 •AVE.a 2�a. t. ..�.`I• ILK i0(1eT10 / -, iW - `• r�;�'%;r6 I • !f,� %y `\\• .,�'r I�';`('�/ �_ �• ! • �) ���i '),�J '���� �• 1, �\�\. `+\:�j�J w r .' /'\'�/d��. r;���lt y{+���•'!;` I f�•.•.-ti�� 'a•>'r ..�� ��1.. V ••� :I, ,�••r � ��1 �! � ��. r I~ '`ll�l'1�' \ :.\ �'. ,�� •tr='/..<-. �' . ltic0,. /i'R:.`�), � t r y TO: ; Orange County Planning Department . FROM: Harlan G. Schroth, R.S. Environmental Health Engineering Specialist Division of Environmental Health Orange County Health Department DATE: April11, 1972 SUBJECT: Addendum to the Health Department Report of February 25, 1972, entitled "A Survey of Individual Sewage Disposal Systems - Orange Park Acres" } Since the writing of the subject report, this Department has continued to investi- gate chemical and bacteriological quality of wells in the Orange Park Acres area. In addition, we have made further investigations of the soil conditions relative to the use of individual sewage disposal systems. In reviewing the additional data.presented in this addendum, we find that it further supports our original recommendation; that if individual sewage disposal systems are to be constructed in the area, they should only be allowed on a selective basis, after the findings of soil borings or percolation tests have shown the feasibility of such systems. Chemical analyses were run on samples collected from nine (9) wells. The results of these analyses appear in Table A I. A review of the data indicates that all nine (9) wells were high in total dissolved solids, not unlike shallow wells in adjacent areas. There is one notable exception and that is the Lazy "B" Golf Course well which exhibited twice the number of TDS and high nitrates than other wells. There is not sufficient information available at this time to make a judge- ment regarding the cause of high mineralization in this water. The well has been resampled and the results of the chemical analysis is pending. This problem will be investigated further. 'Bacteriological analyses were run on the nine (9) wells in the area. The results of these analyses are contained in Table A II. A review of this data indicates that water from these wells met the bacteriological standards for domestic use. There is no indication at this time that these wells are being contaminated by sewage disposal systems in this area. Additional soil information was obtained by drilling four (4) test holes. The results of these test borings are contained in Tables A III, A IV, A V and A VI. A review of this data is found in the following summaries: Test Hole #1 was located in the northeast corner of Division of Land 1323. From 2' to 40' , the soil is verycompact, having little or no absorption capacity. It is interrupted with one layer at 20' to 22.5' which may have some absorption capacity. However, we find this portion of the property unsuited for seepage pits. Test Hole #2 was located in the southwest corner of Division of Land 1323. From 2' to 20' , the soil is very compact, having little or no absorption capacity. From 20' to 30' , the soil is permeable. However, water was reached at 30' and in wet years the water table would-be higher. ' 4 r -2- Test Hole #3 was located at 10722 Morada. From 1.5' to 20' , the soil exhibits medium to poor infiltration characteristics. This indicates that a well engineered sewage disposal system may be expected to function properly. Test Hole #4 was located on Lot K of Tract 918. From 2' to 13' , the soil exhibits low permeability. From '13' to 30' , the soil is very compact, little or no absorption capacity. This area is unsuited for seepage pits. RESULTS OF CHE(-'AL ANALYSES ORANGE PARK ACRES Results in mg/l Date of Total Well Designation Sample Dissolved ABS Na NO3 C1 SO4 Solids Mead Ranch Well #1 2-29-72 685 0. 12 152 6. 3 158 110 Well #2 .2-29-72 705 0.03 130 9. 7 160 111 Well #3 2-29-72 975 0.02 118 11.0 242 118 Well #4 2-29-72 1110 0.04 132 13.0 310 93 Well #5' 2-29-72 940 0.02 118 15.0 242 109 Bob d Jean' s Cafe 2-29-72 1145 ' 0.00 134 9.4 298 143 Lazy "B" Golf Course 2-29-72 .2420 0.08 255 167. 670 314. Sully Miller Well #1 2-29-72 1025 0.03 102 11. 112 358 Well #2 2-29-72 1115 0.04 108 2:8 130 365 • I A I April ll,.* 1972 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES OBTAINED FROM WELLS IN ORANGE PARK ACRES WELL. DESIGNATION DATE OBTAINED COLIFORM MPN/100 ml Meads Ranch Well #1 3-14-72 <2.2 North side of Chapman Avenue at Newport Boulevard 3-22-72 .42.2 Irrigation #2 3-14-72 ' <2.2 " 3-22-72 42.2 Bob & Jean's Cafe 3-14-72 42.2 12620 E. Chapman Domestic 3-22-72 <2.2 Lazy "B" Golf Course 3-14-72 . <2.2 10604 Meads Avenue Irrigation 3-23-72 <2.2 Sully Miller Co. 3-14-72 <2.2 6145 Santiago Canyon Road Domestic 3-23-72 <2.2 e ti April 11, 1972 A II SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES BROCK G. Elevation 480' 0 - 2' Top soil 2 - 5.5' Sandy clay 5.5 - 6' Sandy clay, some gravel 6 - 17.5' Clay, brown 17.5 - 20' Clay and gravel, brown 20 - 22.5' Gravel, some clay 22.5 - 35' Clay and gravel 35 40' Gravel and some clay April 11, 1972 A III • • , SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES BROCK #2. Elevation 460' 0 - 2.' Top soil 2 - 10' Clay, brown 10 - 20' Clay, greyish brown 20 - 25' Sand, some clay 25 - 30' Sand, some gravel and water 30 - 45' Clay, brown . April 11, 1972 A IV SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES 10722 MORADA Elevation 500' 0 - 1.5' Topsoil (gumbo) 1.5 - 10' Sandy clay, dark brown 10 - 20` Sandy clay, light brown- 20 - 30' Clay, grey April ?l, 1972 A V SOIL BORING LOG 1 ORANGE PARK ACRES �.. ' ORANGE PARK ACRES MUTUAL WATER CO. Elevation 600' TRACT NO. 918 LOT K 0 - 2' Top soil 2 - 5'. Sandy clay, brown 5 - 13' Clay, brown 13 - 30' Semiconsolidated very fine sand and 'silt, grey April 11, 1972 A VI ORANGE PARK ACRES i SOIL INFILTRATION CHARACTERISTICS L' . . may.,�.��, �� �� �• / c: -' � � _ - Fv Now s• LEGEND n Orange Park Acres Community Boundary Lines High Infiltration Rate (Greater than 2.0 inches/hour) • Medium Infiltration Rate (1.0 to 2.0 inches/hour) Low Infiltration Rate (Less than 1.0 inches/hour) J • Water Well Agenda Item No. 3(e) J. R. ELPERS, M.D. N-T'Y O F HEALTH OFFICER z U SANTA ANA OFFICE 645 NORTH ROSS STREET © RAN G E TELEPHONE: 834-3131 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, California 92702 HEALTH AGENCY December 15, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District #7 - P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: Please find eenlosed a copy of "A Survey of Individual Sewage Systems - Orange Park Acres" dated February 25, 1972 and a copy of the addendum to the report dated April 11, 1972. v In reviewing the information contained in the report, I find that the facts remain unchanged. In addition, our service reports of individual sewage disposal system pumpouts tend to confirm that a continuing prob- lem exists in this area. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, rA �j�i `Z . /. 'Schroth, . Environmental Health Engineering Specialist Division of Environmental Health HGS/sc enc. v •� A SURVEY OF IIJI)TVIDUAL SM-.AGE • DISPOSAL SYSTEhIS Orange ')ark Acres t County of Orange .r California January - February, 1972 DATE: February 25, 1972 • REQUESTED BY: Orange County Planning Department 'CONDUCTED BY: John E. 'Hainesy R.S. Environmental Heal.kh Specialist Andrew Pearson Assistant Environmental Health Sanitarian ' Richard Gr.udzinshi Assistant Environmental Health Sanitarian Water Quality Control Section Division of Environmental Health Orange County Health Department REPORT WRITTEN BY: Harlan G. Schroth, R.S. Environmental Health Engineering Specialist Orange County Health Department SUMARY OF FINDINGS: Durint the months of January and February, 1972, the Orange County Health Department conducted a survey of individual sewage system conditions in Orange Park Acres, an unincorporated area of Orange County. The' survey consisted of personal interviews with residents, field observations and a review of all available individual sewage disposal pumping records, soil maps, well logs and both chemical and bacteriological sampling of domestic well water and suspected sewage overflows. The findings of the survey are summarized as follows: 1. A review of geological information of the Orange Park Acres area indicates that sub-surface soils are variable in composition. As. a result, the percolative capacity of the sub-soils varies from one sub area to another, ranging from very poor in 65% of -the area, marginal in 30% and good in 5%. 2. In some' sections of the area, the variable surface topography adds to the problem -of poor soil infiltration characteristics, making these areas entirely unsuitable for the disposal of sewage effluent. 3. Reports from cor,riercial sewage pumpers, submitted to the Health Department, show that during the past three (3) years, fifty (50) systems have been pumped, with seven (7) of these requiring two or more pumpines within a period of one hundred twenty (120) days. 4. Interviews with 143 of the 300 homeowners in the area indicate a system failure rate of 16% over the most recent five year period. Also, 297. of the persons interviewed admitted to having their system purged out at least once since installation. • `2" r S. During the field survey, two sewage disposal. systems were observed to be overt l.owi.n�. 6. Currently, no soil b-ori.ngs or percolation tests are required by the ment of Building and Safety prior to the issuance of a permit for the C011- struction of an i-ndividual sewage disposal system. C0NCLUSION AND RFCO,2-1ENDATIO,;S: - 1 Orange Park 4cres area is generally not well suited for disposal of sewage by indivi- dual systems., This is evidenced by the recent history of disposal system failures and the very low soil infiltration rates exhibited in 65% of the area. Since much of the developed and developable land lies within this area, it is our opinion that sewage disposal system failures will continue, even if no further development occcirs, and will increase in frequency in proportion with future development. It is, therefore, recommended that the necessary steps be initiated to provide alter- nate means of. sewage disposal in the areas of poor infiltration characteristics, The most obvious alternative is, of course, to provide sanitary sewers. However, if expense is no object, elaborate, well-engineered individual. systems, utilizing advanced techniques such as soil replacement and evapo-transpiration, might }possibly function in.such areas. The chances of success are not too great. It is further recommended that if individual sewage disposal systems .are permitted in the future, they be approved only on the following conditions: 1. That, prior to issuance of a building permit, a log of soil borings and results of percolation test be submitted to the Department-of Building and Safety for evaluation on each lot for which an application is made, The • aforementioned percolation test should be performed and reported by a Registered Sanitarian, Registered Civil or Sanitary Engineer, Registered Geologist or Registered Engineering Geologist. , 2. That each proposed individual disposal system be designed by a Registered Civil or Sanitary Engineer or Engineering Geologist. 3. That the proposed building site not be less than one acre. 4. Tha-t an additional percolation system,* equal to 100% of the original design capacity, be constructed and connected at the time of original construction. S. That means be provided -for assured routine preventive maintenance of such systems, such as by the formation of a septic tank maintenance district. DISCUSSION: Scope of Investigation The Health Department cgnducted a survey of individual sewage disposal systems con- ditions in Oran-e Park Acres community, an unincorporated area in Orange County. This area is located in T4S, R9W, Sections 13, 14, 23, 24, 25 and 26. The survey w_-s co- ducted during the months of January and February, 1972, and consisted of the foli.cc,:ic investigations: 1. A house Lo hOUSC survey tir,a conducted Lo detect- exi.sLi.ng sewage oveflows all(! liomeo:Iners were inLervi wed to det.crm;ne Lhe hisLory Of sewavc system puaipings and failures. `we 2. Avail-able geological. data on sub-surface soil and v ater conditions was reviewed. •3. Interviews %.;ere held -,-Hth personnel of the Orange County Water District, .0range County Flood Control District, U. S. Geological Survey Office, Orange _ County Building DcpartmenL and the Orange Park Acres MuLual. Water Company. 4. All available health Department pumping records for septic tanks, seepage pits and cesspools in the area were reviewed. 5. Samples from water wclls and suspected sewage overflows were collected for ellemical and bacteriological analysis. Background of the Area The coip-munity of Orange Park Acres northern boundary begins at the western portion of the Sully-Miller sand and gravel operation and follows Santiago Creek to Villa Park Dam. The eastern boundary begins at Villa Park Dam and continues south through the Villa Park Dam Regional Park site to Chapman Avenue. The southern boundary proceeds west along Chapman Avenue to Newport Avenue, southeast along Newport Avenue, approximately 2000 feet to the southern range of hills, following the ridge line west- erly to a point where the hills intersect Chapman Avenue. The western boundary begins ' at Chapman Avenue and proceeds north following the ridge of the hills to Santiago Creek. In 1929, a deep water well was drilled near Santiago Creek in T4S, R9117, Section 27, and the Orange Park Acres Mutual Water Company was formed to serve the area. With v.-ater piped in, Orange Park. Acres was divided into parcels of land for orchards. Homes were established in some of the groves. : In the late .1940's and early 1950's, chicken ranchers began to es,taolish operations in the area that threatened the continued existence of the pastoral setting. As a result, .residents in the late 1950's, working in conjunction with established poultrymen, obtained one acre minimum lots (there are some one-half acre lots), single family residence zoning in most of the area to maintain a desirable balance between residen- tial and ranching activities in the community (Orel. No. 685, passed by the Board of Supervisors on March 9, 1954, designated the area E4-1 acre minimum lots). The number of residents doubled in the decade of the late 1960's. At the present time, there are approximately 300 families living in the area. Currently, twelve (12) new homes are under construction in the area. Many owners are subdividing their land and offering one, two, and three acre parcels for sale. Since most lots in the area are large (one acre) , the Orange County Department of Building and Safety does not require that percolation tests or soil borings be made in advance of construction of individual sewage disposal systems. The "rule of thumb" applied is a septic tank: plus one seepage pit per bedroom. In other words, it is assumed that a leaching area can be depended upon to dispose of sewage effluent regardless of the physical properties of the soil. ' .4 • Veolopy and soli CI► r ic.tcri::tics atioo�; in rea is the a cuust mainly of. non-percolati.ve sedimentary rocks 1'he higher clev w}tl.ch consist of sandstone, shale, and siltsUnic; including some volcanic rocks and rock;. ol.dcr titan Tertiary. •lower cl.cvations cxhibi.t Cream terrace deposits of late plei.stocene and older 11l.l.11vSaY dcposi is Con:,,lstin- of semiconsoli.dated silt, sand, grave]. and rubble havirt- wa to bear.inY cap<1bi.l i.Ci.cs. Soil.: found zilortg Santi_n.-o Creek consists of seaticonsoli.dated silt, sand and gravel. having a Wi h infl.l.tt:atfon capability of greater than two inches (2.") per hour. Soils of thi,.l type t)rc found in approximately five percent (5%) of the area. Else- where, approxamat-ely thirty percent (30%) of: the study area consists of older alluvial deposit: of 5eraicon:o].i.dlted silt, clay, sand and gravel which have a medium infiltra- tion rate: of one inch 0.") to tvo inches (2") per hour. The remainder of the area, approximately si.Y.t-y-five percent (65%) consists of consolidated sandstone, shale and sil.tstone. This soil. type exhibits. very poor infiltration characteristics, less than one inch (1") per }tout'. (See Plate I, Soil Infi.ltr.ati.on Characteristics) ' •Sol.l.s in vhich the Infiltration rate is less than two inches (2") in one hour are : "Unsuitable for seepage pits 'and rates slower than one inch (1") per hour are unsuit- able for any type of soil absorption sewage effluent disposal. system. Therefore, areas exhi.bi.ting tho aforementioned infiltration characteristics should not be developed unless suitable Gltet'tiate disposal facilities are available. petalled information on ground water characteristics in the area was not readily avail- able during the period that the survey was conducted. It was established that- most of the water ~:ells -,re shallow v,atcr table wells. The drilled deptlis of the wells Lange between fifty feet (50' ) to one hundred feet (100' ). Along Handy Creck near 014tw Southern boundry of the area, the static water level is approximately thirty feet (30' ). " '-Alony'Santi.ago Creek -the static water level is approximately sixty feet (60' ). Field Survey of Existlnp Individual Sewa,e Disposal Systems. • _ - A house to house survey was conducted and homeowners were interviewed to gather data on the history of scv-sge disposal system failures and make observations for evidence of any faulty systems. A system failure i-s defined as the inability of the disposal system to function properry without clogging and the resultant overflowing conditions. One hundred and forty-three (143) of the approximately three-'hundred .(300) homeowners In the area were 1ntervicwed. All of the homes were visited but over half of the residents were not at horse. ' The data below represents the results obtained from the interviews conducted during the survey and Health Department records: • .1. Forty- two (42) persons, or twenty-nine percent (29%) of those interviewed, _ admitted to at le, one pumping since their disposal system was installed. '—Elotaever, when pressed they were vague regarding the exact number of times the system had been pumped and the time lapse between pumpings. . 2. Twenty-three (23) persons, or sixteen percent (16%) of those interviewed, reported leaching system failures wi thin a fiveyear period. Information was not given during the interviews indicating the occurence of more than one failure. • 3. A rei,1cw of Health D:•ParLmc•nt pumping records indicates tliz,t of the Pprroxlrncitely three hundred 'homes i.n the arcs forty-one (0) , thirteen percent (131) of the i ndi.vi(Iua). sewage di._posy 1, systems., hid one pumpi-uj; 'Wool during the years of 1970 and 1971. 4. huri.ng the fiel-d inv-estig<at.ions two system failures we' re observed, as f' evidenced by the overflowing of sewage effluent from the leach,i.ri- systerns. 5.. Of the approximately 300 homeowners in Orange Park Acres, 157, or about .fifty-six percent (SG%) of the total, %.:ere not at ,home or unavailable for 11iL6rvicwir,g derring the survey. During the i.ntrcrvievs, the residents in' general were uncooperative when we attempted to elicit infbrmati.on about their sewage disposal. systems-. There i•ias a pervasive feeling among resideuts that the survey would *acceleratc incorporation into the City of Orange, resulting in zone changes which would destroy the present rural atmosphere. -Many of the persons interviewed were housei:,ives, who in most cases had little know- ledge about their sewage disposal systems. There was complete agreement, among all persons interviewed, that homeowners relied entirely upon cesspool pumpers to avoid sewage overflows when problems are -first noted. During the survey there were two homes where sewage was observed overflocaing from the leaching lines due to a system failure. The most frequent complaint made by the residents- of the 23 homes reporting system failures, was that the permeability of the soil is poor, which causes oversaturation of the leaching lines and seepage pits. In addition, they encountered problems with their disposal systems not fLnctioning prope'r.ly due to rain water infiltration during . the rainy season. Chemical and bacteriological analyses of the ei.ght '(8) water wells in the area were performed in an attempt to establish erhat effect, if any, .the sub-surface disposal of sewage has upon the quality of the underground water in the area. The results of the analyses are pending; therefore, no data is available at this time. However, we will continue to investigate this problem and the findings will be reported at a later date. f ORANGE PARK ACRES SOIL INFILTRATIO14 CHARACTERISTICS ' �, ` eel 7 Pill\/' \� LEGEND - �-� Orange Park Acres Community Boundary Lines High Infiltration Rate (Greater than 2.0 inches/hour) Medium Infiltration Rate (1.0 to 2.0 inches/hoar) Low Infiltration Rate (Less than 1.0 inches/hour) Water Well s ;c ' '~ •�'� (/l/f 1 41� =y ORANGE PARK ACKBS C0:4•4UNITY ..". 4 � • IVI ••../�,� , ; '••• • .r �•T+ �,. •'i, J •i; +��5!/'r^i;m�nP!n1-.111D1%�.,I,I ^ BOUNDARY LINES '.•.t �` 1� ,tom �'lw.�.^.,�irI ,O1i`� '�� �•��O /��:1 �� -i:•"� v- t�•�'� � ,�J/ 1 , ��,1��w�-__.•w-..,.ec �' I i'rJ`=�a� ��.. .:�_—�.J J a.�•r��/ �i�/ .:�>,f�00,+l. J. - ``•1 •�U .............«.... '`�.»�..�r:`� r :r����' �•J _ ..`'-1�._.�i/''�:�-J'.�� \._ .QO."'�� '�'.'•�.•+ ,'•.,.':l,::-�>� sl N. � ` (1 .�; • .. ..•.,.1.�. ... ....... ���5�1, f � •I �+ O� � `'- ` �' /"J3°�`fO��.4`�._ 1, •• J•',1 �•``"�' ���C`'•`�\+. i «+ •• J h B BLVD ;•!✓... / to/0VC1 P��. �(. pLD' f f. F ..��y.�� ''t' )'• #\, \�� M , t o l -• \_��� �` /`! vim ' !'. ` , 4 -�\ , i � /^ems � r/ I t a �;• \�,• -�' . ji ,��' .. t t � �.�^^" ? i� J ,Y-�'^'1 "�� r''c �, '\ 1 �.\1'•��,,j�\ I \ I O ` I•✓� .J � p1 "t ,' (�/�I/ � .of• +'tit. .�^\..•`♦\..+.� •� ��,��- •-��,:�`\����•�•�= -�,- •�1 � ,`l�y �, /� •� *• s •ROAD• _ ' ,'.• \ �1: �� - •••li•L= - .i-'•V�A '_Grp- ;}`\�' !` ' iJ '..\ ?'\. ' „'- 'j •• • /f \ 'r ,�;�sss ;.:'._ i 1!•�^�.�s�R • t ,,/�/.. I / i �1�`\`1 .'� ': r'.�`�C Xl��•;•�\ i 1 Y\Ila Park L I�} ,` ;i/ `�`�/�\1 �� ' ' •• -,�\l�•! \/� . •L,N_re.LN•S •SC(1 i • .. •• �// :/ (/ ) 'j I 1� 1/i' _ / '• J p� 'a �vi�� �,�,' S\ U � ^ '/-Yi ��v� _ / r; .'\ ++ ? ""'41 �• '� �l1 (r�/.;•".' ���JZ/\�l� �,`,, �:�y ,_��• •Il//J��.��',��i'�O v'. ?�j1� i.4 _ .��\�+ \I `:,_'+_t•••r./ Fl i ' . ,• ��U ti`,1'j ' 1 +l i ' ! '' ./._ 'J: •• J ,'+ /••,�`�`-`�`� /� I �W '.• ' �, , \\ ' _� �C\`\\\ .ice 1 �S 1 i •, •� m r ":1-.'f ' „ -�•, '1'' k. �� O p :: • fr. 1,l/rt, lv:;! .V•• ,� p Pit II t Yf•�,• ��••.M� 53,.. ,.M,.. {r1/(/j/,4•� •w\n:` /•1n , ... - �..1\� r +`•� �� 1 I".'••, ,_;yJ 1 • _ �• �r� i' \;\'\" {{,y• .J\ . 1\.1....... r.......... ..n. \' .`. ✓ (',' x•ti l--f(r„-VVj V�/� • • 41,(f Y( `� •l,n%% l 1 _ .. .,...ram',. :__ %...4... .�.t....... :y.j 1 P /• -. • / 1 .'L('.)'1,.{;' 4 11;�, \ i Y \\ j / I' \ %ny r, co J�\.i• 51 (((_ ?71 f ''� -+ �P'`• - BOND • ••. AVE` �.\ '{�J �)' A�'lip, ,tA �F i/• , _ -+.. rr• a l -•``3 - `b:G2 tt �,1/, \ �\\ _ /" _.�, •Ili. `s e:._a"p ( ` i' .` •w IFviy I1 rW .� ,1= 11 l G t''1�.. \ ,1 a `;,.f(I :�..:r,t,.r �� ..• .,; /1 � \ 1 �' ,,��� / \., 1 �� I:a u • . ,I Z \ +...:ti:����•f,Dial •+':i�. �1�'t}�t�1`\, e• tRYtNF.''_' `mac..• \•d ` •t•.\= t '``�=i�_/, I i . •i a \\ �' ` , ��LLL" .)i. 1 1: 1 t _�- _.�.. =a�• -�... � 'fit' � ./-"•' ` _ � ._''•+:\ \ /r //+•%c 111'e 1 i�(\�i%`�' ��r ( ( O•it i;. L _ �a r��t` `•41:�y.` �..p�AR i.' '� ^_ � j '• .....z .A_ _.may.--- _.N_ - .rl) 1 / ��,!1,J� :J.. •e E d� ~ t �� ,�', ♦: -_"' ��A V ^'' 'i • •7 / 313 f���'!� '_'��. I i �••.. :, :, ', \\ ,l .S• �r 4�'�••'' + �j '1 +. -i • •� �.. ii,4N li,�'y'1(yi(�' 1`�1•' ::%"' `_ :� * r<• Jl�.�q•'` Y' !• \ 1 \\ .`Z � � _ /•, yI• • 1°U ,I IN\`q\',. .. 1'7.�I,�/M'l`11�,';.`a/.S ._ '.'f 1\• •..w3. \,\��it.!' "'�ii ♦ � \ � I�.S \` } // � Y '>:�•, , L /• /'1 iJI ' i+�:f. ��Iw. v.l.. 1.. �I /{�'\ ♦t f I ! p Z �T'A�- ! J.W ( �°O�l J / r1'�,1• .J,'\\ �'�r^�•tl`'.`�::M..,y�'�r // ,�` /� y �`•i. ~ \ '�\ ��, 1 � �Wa-�:-:•1;• i•I l.�+i . {ill/--''!,. f:••�.(//!'•...,=''��'-`;. �;'�.�� :'�v!/..•S t\ �1,'� � \ (., `�� /� .i�1\ � It AVE .. - - •su_ r.J 11 -•� LI '1od�:n ^J� '/�f/fl ``` ` •,u x.�- �•' �._+.. IY� �•,�-';`,�:'t •�,j /.. .'�' t\ l {��.'�": it \L,Y / i ( .r. __ 1 '� o �C :`a � '�� � 1�.� •', � ry�r F \i� ��'!1 T,•... ,�` �1` + .\ .. 1�I� I�"�.� r �;��%J i,.l�:Z`• ,.. ) n_'___i+- -- r, TO: i Orange County Planning Department . FROM: Harlan G. Schroth, R.S. Environmental Health Engineering Specialist ' Division of Environmental Health Orange County Health Department DATE: April 11, 1972 SUBJECT: Addendum to the Health Department Report of February 25, 1972, entitled "A Survey of Individual Sewage Disposal Systems - Orange Park Acres" Since the writing of the subject report, this Department has continued to investi- gate chemical and bacteriological quality of wells in the Orange Park Acres area. In addition, we have made further investigations of the soil conditions relative to the use of individual sewage disposal systems. In reviewing the addi tional data•presented in this addendum, we find that it further supports our original recommendation; that if individual sewage disposal systems are to be constructed in the area, they should only be allowed on a selective basis, after the findings of soil borings or percolation tests have shown the feasibility of such systems. Chemical analyses were run on samples collected from nine (9) wells. The results of these analyses appear in Table A I. A review of the data indicates that all nine (9) wells were high in total dissolved solids, not unlike shallow wells in adjacent areas. There is one notable exception and that is the Lazy "B" Golf .�r Course well which exhibited twice the number of TDS and high nitrates than other wells. There is not sufficient information available at this time to make a judge- ment regarding the cause of high mineralization in this water. The well has been resampled and the results of the chemical analysis is pending. This problem will be investigated further. Bacteriological analyses --were run on the nine (9) wells in the area. The results of these analyses are contained in Table A II. A review of this data indicates that water from these wells met the bacteriological standards for domestic use. There is no indication at this time that these wells are being contaminated by sewage disposal systems in this area. Additional soil information was obtained by drilling four (4) test holes. The results of these test borings are contained in Tables A III, A IV, A V and A VI. A review of this data is found in the following summaries: Test Hole #1 was located in the northeast corner of Division of Land 1323. From 2' to 40' , the soil is verycompact, having little or no absorption capacity. It is interrupted with one layer at 20' to 22.5' which may have some absorption capacity. However, we find this portion of the property unsuited for seepage pits. Test Hole #2 was located in the southwest corner of Division of Land 1323. From 2' to 20' , the soil is very compact, having little or no absorption capacity. From 20' to 30' , the soil is permeable. However, water was reached at 30' and in wet years the water table would- be higher. i 1 1 -2 Test Hole #3 was located at 10722 Morada. From 1.5' to 20' , the soil exhibits medium to poor infiltration characteristics. This indicates thaL a well engineered sewage disposal system may be expected to function properly. Test Hole #4 was located on Lot K of Tract 918. From 2' to 13' , the soil %we exhibits low permeability. From '13' to 30' , the soil is very compact, little or no absorption capacity. This area is unsuited for seepage pits. ' RESULTS OF CH mICAL, ANALYSES ORANGE PARK ACRES Results in mg/1 Date of Total Well Designation Sample Dissolved ABS Na NO3 Cl, SO4 Solids Mead Ranch Well #1 2-29-72 685 0. 12 152 6. 3 158 110 Well #2 .2-29-72 705 0.03 130 9. 7 160 ill Well #3 2-29-72 975 0.02 118 11.0 242 118 Well #4 2-29-72 1110 0.04 132 13.0 310 93 Well #5' 2-29-72 940 0.02 118 15.0 242 109 Bob & Jean's Cafe 2-29-72 1145 ' 0.00 134 9.4 298 143 Lazy "B" Golf Course . 2-29-72 2420 0.08 255 167. 670 314• Sully Miller Well #1 2-29-72 1025 0.03 102 11. 112 358 Well #2 2-29-72 1115 0.04 108 2.8 130 365 • A I April '.1 ,' 1972 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF BACTERIOLOGICAL • SAMPLES OBTAINED FROM WELLS IN . ORANGE PARK ACRES WELL DESIGNATION DATE OBTAINED COLIFORM MPN/100 i:!! �A Meads Ranch Well #1 3-14-72 <2.2 North side of Chapman Avenue at Newport Boulevard 3-22-72 42.2. Irrigation #2 3-14-72 < <2.2 " 3-22-72 42.2 Bob b Jean's Cafe 3-14-72 <2.2 12620 E. Chapman Domestic 3-22-72 <2.2 Lazy "B" Golf Course 3-14-72 . <2.2 10604 Meads Avenue Irrigation 3-23-72 <2.2 Sully Miller Co. 3-14-72 <2.2 6145 Santiago Canyon Road _ Domestic 3-23-72 <2.2 i NOW April 11, 1972 A II SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES BROCK G. Elevation 480' 0 - 2' Top soil 2 - 5.5' Sandy clay 5.5 - 6' Sandy clay, some gravel 6 - 17.5' Clay, brown 17.5 - 20' Clay and gravel, brown 20 - 22.5' Gravel, some clay 22.5 - 35' Clay and gravel 35 40' Gravel and some clay woo April 11, 1972 A III SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES BROCK #2. Elevation 460' 0 - 2' Top soil 2 - 10' Clay, brown 10 - 20' Clay, greyish brown 20 - 25' Sand, some clay 25 - 30' Sand, some gravel and water 30 - 45' Clay, brown . April ll, 1972 A IV SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES 10722 MORADA Elevation 500' .r . 0 - 1.5' Top- soil (gumbo) 1.5 - 10' Sandy clay, dark brown 10 - 20' Sandy clay, light brown 20 - 30' Clay, grey i April 11, 1972 A V . SOIL BORING LOG ORANGE PARK ACRES ' ORANGE PARK ACRES MUTUAL WATER CO. Elevation 600' TRACT NO. 918 LOT K 0 - 2' Top soil 2 - 5: Sandy clay, brown 5 - 13' Clay, brown 13 - 30' Semiconsolidated very fine sand and 'silt, grey April 11, 1972 A VI • VL\lLLNU1, Llll\T, /ll.l\GO SOIL INFILTRATION CHARACTERISTICS 4A, IOU . i. ��\\ff �• / �i � � _ p r V. LEGEND !3 1-3 r3 Orange Park Acres Community Boundary Lines High Infiltration Rate (Greater than 2.0 inches/hour) Medium Infiltration Rate (1.0 to 2.0 inches/hour) Low Infiltration Rate (Less than 1.0 inches/hour) • Water Well. ' WJML:PLMcE :bz 12/13/76 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITA- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY MAKING DETERMINA- TIONS, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY SUBJECT TO CON- FIRMATION OF VOTERS, ESTABLISHING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION, DESCRIBING EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF TERRI- TORY ANNEXED, AND CALLING SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOND ELECTION ORANGE PARK ACRES ANNEXATION NO. 51 (No. 76-1) WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County on July 14, 1976 , adopted its resolution of the Local Agency Forma- tion Commission making determinations and approving proposed Annexa- tion No. 51 to Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, the boundaries of said territory, as modified to refle t deletion of lands heretofor annexed by separate proceedings , being more partic- ularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof; WHEREAS , by said resolution the Commission found the terri- tory proposed to be annexed to be inhabited, as defined by Section 56045 of the Government Code; assigned to such territory the short-form designation "Annexation No. 51 (No. 76-1)" ; designated County Sanitation District No. 7 as the conducting agency and directed its Board of Directors to initiate annexation proceedings in compliance with said resolution; and directed that anv annexation of such territory ordered by this Board shall be subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; [WHEREAS , pursuant to said terms and conditions this Board obtained and filed with the Clerk of this Board an engineering .se report on existing and proposed sanitary facilities for the portion of the Sanitation District as set forth in said proposed annexation which is not yet supplied with sewage treatment and disposal facilities , and the said report has been approved and adopted by the Board after notice and hearing as required by law; WHEREAS , pursuant to said Local Agency Formation Commission direction, and on November 10 , 1976 , this Board duly adopted its Resolution No . 76-200-7 initiating proceedings , determining the necessity to incur a bonded indebtedness of a portion of County Sanitation District No. 7 and of intention to form Improvement Dis- trict No. 7-1 , setting Thursday, the 16th day of December, 1976 , at the hour of 8 : 00 p .m. , at the Fire Station at 5020 Santiago Boulevard, Orange , California, as the time and place for hearing on said proposed annexation and on the necessity to incur a bonded indebtedness to obtain lands with which to acquire the rights and property and do the work set forth in the report ; WHEREAS , notice of said hearing was given by publication, posting , and mailing in accordance with the requirements of law, CD as appears from the proofs thereof on file with the Secretary of this Board; WHEREAS , at the time and place fixed for said hearing, the Commission' s resolution making determinations was read aloud or summarized and thereafter all oral or written protests , objections , or evidence made , presented, and filed were heard and received on the questions of the proposed annexation, the improvement district , the extent thereof, the proposed improvements, and the amount of debt to be incurred; and -2- WHEREAS , this Board has duly considered those factors required to be considered by it pursuant to Section 56314. 1 of the Govern- ment Code and all other matters which this Board deems material to said annexation and to the formation of said improvement district and the incurring of said bonded indebtedness ; NOW, THEREFORE , the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does HEREBY FIND, DETER- MINE , and ORDER as follows : Section 1 . Having given due consideration to the matters material thereto and after full investigation, hearing , and examina- tion, this Board hereby determines and finds that annexation of the territory more particularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto attached will be for the interest of the landowners or present or future inhabitants within the District and within the territory to be annexed, and it is hereby further determined and found that all of the lands proposed to be annexed will be benefited by becoming a part of the District. Section 2 . Any and all objections to the proposed annexation or the terms and conditions hereinafter specified are hereby over- ruled. Section 3 . This Board deems it necessary that the County Sanitation District incur a bonded indebtedness for the said pro- posed Improvement District No. 7-1 . Section 4. The purpose for which the proposed debt is to be incurred is the acquisition of rights of service and use of the existing treatment and outfall facilities of District No. 7 ; the acquisition and construction of major trunk lines , facilities , and -3- appurtenances to serve the portion of the District within said Annexation No. 51 ; and the acquisition of easements , rights of way, and other property or structures necessary or convenient thereto , together with all costs and estimated costs incidental to or connected with the acquisition, construction, improving, or financing of the project . Section 5 . The exterior boundaries of the proposed portion of County Sanitation District No. 7 which will be benefited by the proposed indebtedness are set forth on a map entitled "Annexation No. 76-1 to County Sanitation District No. 7 , " which map is on file with said Board and which man shall govern for all details as to the extent of the improvement district. Section 6 . Said proposed portion of the District as set forth on said map shall hereupon constitute and be known as "Improvement District No. 7-1 of County Sanitation District No . 7 of Orange County, " and said improvement district is hereby declared to be formed. Section 7 . The determinations made in this resolution relative to said improvement district shall' be final and conclusive . Section 8. The territory proposed to be annexed is inhabited , as such term is defined in Government Code Section 56045 . Section 9 . Written protests to the proposed annexation filed and not withdrawn represent less than 50% of the assessed value of land therein and less than 50% of the voting power of voters entitled to vote as a result of residing in or owning property within such ..� territory and that therefore the Board of Directors has acquired jurisdiction to order the annexation of said territory to the Dis- trict. -4- Section 10. Having given due consideration to the Commission' s resolution making determinations and to all other matters relevant and material to said annexation, this Board hereby orders the territory described in said Exhibit "A" and designated Annexation No. 51 to County Sanitation District No . 7 annexed to said County Sanitation District No. 7 subject to the confirmation of the voters within said territory. Section 11 . Said annexation is subject to the terms and condi- tions as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Section 12 . An election is hereby called and ordered to be held and conducted only within the territory proposed to be annexed on Tuesday, the 8th day of March, 1977 , for the purpose of submitting to the voters of said territory the following proposition, to wit : Shall the order adopted on December 16 , 1976 , by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7 of Orange County, ordering the annexation to said dis- trict of the territory described in said order and designated therein as Annexation No. 51 (No . 76-1) to County Sanitation District No. 7 be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in said order? Such terms and conditions including the concurrent formation of a new improvement district and approval of general obligation bonds by the voters therein, all as more particularly set forth in said order. Section 13. A special bond election is hereby called and ordered to be held in said proposed Improvement District No . 76-1 on Tuesday, the 8th day of March, 1977 , for the purpose of sub- mitting to the qualified voters of said Improvement District the proposition of incurring a bonded indebtedness by the issuance of bonds of the District for said Improvement District to obtain funds with which to acquire the rights and property and do the work set forth in the heretofor-referred engineering report. -5- �.. Section 14. The amount of debt to be incurred is $ including all costs and estimated costs incidental to or connected with the acquisition, construction, improving, or financing of the project and all engineering, inspection, legal and fiscal agent' s fees , costs of the bond election and of the issuance of said bonds , bond reserve funds and working capital, and bond interest estimated to accrue during the construction period and for a period of not to exceed 12 months after completion of construction. Section 15 . The proceedings for the purpose of the bond elec- tion shall be limited and shall apply only to the improvement dis- trict benefited by the acquisitions and improvements and as herein described, and taxes for the payment of said bonds , if authorized, and the interest thereon shall be derived exclusively from an annual tax upon the real property in the improvement district. Section 16. The number of years not to exceed which the whole of the bonds are to run is forty (40) years . Section 17 . The bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed eight percent (8%) per annum, payable semiannually after the first year . Section 18 . The bond proposition to be submitted to the voters of Improvement District No. 7-1 is as follows : Shall County Sanitation District No . 7 of Orange County incur a bonded indebtedness for Improvement District No. 7-1 of County Sanitation District No. 7 (Orange Park Acres) in the amount of Dollars ($ ) for the objects and purposes of the acquisition of rights of service and use in existing treatment and outfall facilities of District No. 7 and for the purpose of the acquisition or construction of major trunk lines , facilities , and appurtenances to `� serve said improvement district , and the acquisition of easements , rights of way, and other property or -6- structures necessary or convenient therefor , together with all costs and estimated costs incidental to or connected with the acquisition, construction, improving , or financing of the project? Section 19 . Said special elections shall be held and conducted, the votes thereof canvassed, the returns thereof made , and the results thereof ascertained and determined as herein provided; and in all other particulars not prescribed by this Resolution, the elections shall be held and conducted pursuant to law for the conduct of elections within the Sanitation District . Section 20. The Board of Supervisors and the County Superin- tendent of Schools of the County of Orange , State of California, are hereby requested, pursuant to Chapter 4, Part 2 of Division 12 (comprising Sections 23300 to 23314, inclusive) of the Elections Code of the State of California, to consent to and order the con- solidation of the Special District Elections proposed to be held March 8, 1977 , with the School District Election to be held within the same territory, or in territory that is in part the same , as the territory comprising the proposed Improvement District No. 7-1 of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, on the same date . Section 21. This Board consents to and orders the consolida- tion of said elections . Section 22 . (a) The special elections provided herein are hereby consolidated with the School District Election which will be held within the territory proposed for annexation and Improvement District No. 7-1 on said date. The elections shall be held in the ..� manner provided for the School District Election with which they are consolidated, and, within the territory affected thereby , for -7- said purpose the election precincts , polling places , and officers of election shall be the same. (b) All persons who reside within said territory to be annexed and said Improvement District No. 7-1 and who are registered voters qualified pursuant to law to vote at an election held on said date shall be qualified to vote upon the propositions herein submitted at the special elections . (c) The elections hereby consolidated shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election and only one form of ballot shall be used. Ballots for said special elec- tions shall be provided of the form and number provided by law. On said ballots , in addition to any other printed matter which may be required by law, two voting squares shall be set off to the right of each of the propositions submitted at said election, in the manner provided by law, one having the word "YES" printed before it , and the other having the word "NO" printed before it . (d) Each voter to vote for either of said proposi- tions hereby submitted shall stamp or write a cross (+) in the blank space opposite the word "YES" on the ballot to the right of said proposition, and to vote against either of said propositions shall stamp or write a cross (+) in the blank space opposite the word "NO" on the ballot to the right of said proposition. Section 23 . The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby authorized, pursuant to Section 23306 of the Elections Code , to canvass the returns of the Special District Elections . The canvass may be made by the County Clerk when the Board of ..� Supervisors so orders , pursuant to Section 18401 or Section 18462 . -8- .� Section 24. The polls shall be opened at 7 : 00 a.m, of the day of election and shall be kept open until 8 : 00 p .m. of the same day, when the polls shall be closed, except as to voters in line as provided in Section 14436 of the Elections Code . Section 25 . If, at the special elections provided herein, it shall appear that a majority of the votes cast on the proposi- tion set forth in Section 12 hereof were in favor of the proposi- tion and in favor of the annexation, then said proposition shall be deemed to be accepted and approved, subject , however, to the terms and conditions herein set forth in Exhibit "B. " If, in addition, it shall appear that two-thirds of the votes cast on the proposition set forth in Section 18 hereof are in favor of incurring the bonded indebtedness as proposed, the annexation shall be deemed confirmed, and bonds of the County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, issued in the name of said District and designated "Bonds of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County for Improvement District No. 7-1" for the amount stated in this resolu- tion, shall be issued and sold in the same form and manner as bonds of the entire Sanitation District. In the event of approval of both propositions , the Certificate of Completion shall be filed with the Secretary of State , and such annexation shall thereafter be effective . Section 26 . This Resolution shall be published once a week for three successive weeks by the Secretary of the Board in the , a newspaper of general circulation within ..W County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and Improvement District No. 7-1. The Secretary of the Board shall further cause -9- a certified copy of this resolution to be transmitted by registered mail within five (5) days of its adoption to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, pursuant to Section 56119 of the Government Code . Said mailing shall further constitute notice to the Commission, pursuant to Section 56315 of the Govern- ment Code , of the exclusion of lands found by this Board not to be benefited in becoming a part of Sanitation District No . 7 and Improvement District No. 7-1 . Section 27 . The Secretary of the Board is hereby directed to file with the Board of Supervisors , the County Superintendent of Schools , and the County Clerk of the County of Orange certified copies of this Resolution no later than December 17 , 1976 , as the request and consent to consolidation of elections to be held on March 8 , 1977 . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held on the day of 197_. -10- ` THOMAS J. SKANE, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 300 1901 EAST FOURTH STREET SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 9270S (714) 835-8024 December 16 , 1976 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #7 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Annexation and Bond Authorization Orange Park Acres Gentlemen: I represent a group of owner-residents of the Orange Park Acres area who are not in favor of the Annexation and Bond Authorization to be discussed at the Public Meeting of December 16 , 1976 . At their request, I have circulated a one-page letter/ petition seeking to measure the degree of opposition to the subject Annexation and Bond Authorization. A copy of that letter/petition is attached for your information. The letter was mailed late this past week with returns coming in contin- uously since that time. On the weekend just past, the circular entitled "Orange Park Acres Sewers" was distributed in the neighborhood. Subsequently, the letter of December 14, 1976 on the letter- head of Orange Park Acres Association, Inc. was distributed. Copies of both are attached. Both documents invite attendance at the Public Meeting of December 16, 1976 , prior to making a decision on signing my petition. The letter of December 14 , 1976 specifically states: "Don' t sign anything until you know the complete costs , and realize that if you don' t need sewers you don' t have to hook up to them. " It is submitted, that the circular and letter have mislead the residents into not signing my petition until after the December 16 , 1976 hearing. The only fair position to take is to continue the hearing until all those who have Board of Directors December 16, 1976 Orange County Sanitation Page Two District #7 not signed the petition because of the urging of the circulars , can decide, sign and return the petition. In that way, the Board will have a measure of the level of opposition without the expense of calling an election. Further, the completeness of the contents of the Notice sent by the District is raised by those documents when they urge attendance at the meeting to '�jet all the facts and answers about sewers" . If the Notice is deficient, then that alone should be reason to continue the hearing until a corrected Notice is sent. Please consider this letter a protest on behalf of all who have returned the petition to me, which number represents 170 of the parcels involved, as well as a formal request to continue the hearing for the reasons stated above. Thank you for your cooperation and patience. Sincerely, Thomas J Skane, J -. Attorney at Law TJS,Jr:mcr enclosures THOMAS J. SKANE, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 300 1901 EAST FOURTH STRc_T SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 (714) 835-8024 SUBJECT: ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 AND SEWER BOND AUTHORIZATION OF $1, 025, 000 Dear Orange Park Acres Property Owner: I have been retained by a group of your fellow Orange Park Acres owners-residents to assist them in opposing the proposed Annexation and Sewer Bond Authorization which, if passed, will impose an additional tax burden upon you. You have been sent a Notice of a Public hearing to be held on December 16, 1976 to determine if an election on the Annexation and Sewer Bond should be held.. That Notice details the proposal and also states that a Petition in opposition to the election will terminate the Annexation efforts. The lower portion of this letter constitutes the Petition which will be presented at the Public Meeting on December 16 , 1976. Please sign it and fill in the blanks noted and return this letter in the en- closed envelope. Your support in opposition to the expensive and ap- parently unnecessary Annexation and Bond issuance is urgently needed. Sincerely, Thomas�J� Skane TJS:du PETITION I am opposed to the Annexation of the Orange Park Acres area to Sanitation District No. 7 and the Sewer Bond Authorization in the amount of $1, 025, 000. 00. Signature Address Date Acreage Owned_`_ acres Resident Owner_ Absentee Owner � ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWErt Enemies of ORANGE PARK ACRES' proposed sewer system are striking out. Whin our OPA Association President George Rach contacted their attorney, Thomas J. Skane, Jr. , he refused to tell George who retained hi~ to fight against Orange Park. Acres servers, The attorney for the person( s) who don't want to be known are asking Orange Park Acres residents to sign a petition to prevent an election. Who is it that wants to deny Orange Park Acres citizens their democratic right to vote? r.J PROTECT ORANGE PARK ACRES1 RIGHTS Comp to the Public Hearing Villa Park Fire House Thursday, 7:30 p.m. December 16, 1976 You have the right to know all the facts so that you can decide what is best for Orange Park Acres„ Don't forget to come to the Orange Park Association Christmas Part7 to meet all yolar friends and neighbors on Frida _evening Dacamber 17th. This yaar3 party wili ba at Maryanne and Ron Daniels homy at 19941 Daniel Lane (oif of ..i_ Orange Park Blvd. , near Chapman Ave) . f ORANGE PARK ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 2365 ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669 December 14, 1976 Dear Neighbor, In the last few days, I have recieved numerous phone calls from OPA residence about the self addressed inquiry from a Santa Ana attorney . This attorney does not represent your OPA Association and he will not reveal the party he represents . For the last year we have been working on steps to bring sewers into the area. There are residence today that need sewers and are having to go to the City of Orange to get them. We can provide sewers ourselves and stay out of the city and hopefully avoid their higher tax rate. Please understand your Association wants you to attend the meeting and get all the facts and answers about sewers. Don't sign anything until you know the complete costs, and realize that if you don't need sewers you don't have to hook up to them. SEWER MEETING: THURSDAY DEC. 16, 1976 TIME: 8:00 p.m. LOCATION: FIRE HOUSE After finding out the facts and you want to withdraw that self addressed letter you may do so at this meeting. Your President, MrEIING DATE DECEMBER 16, 1976 TIME 8:00 P.M. DiSTRICTS 7 _ DISTRICT 1 JOINT FOA; D-l' SSEVl1l1:; GARTHE• • • • • (D 1 EDITI CN) ANTHONY. IEDGAft� • • SHARP • • • • • DOSTAL) . . . . . . .BARRETT. . . . �— (DIEDRICH) . . . . .A1dTHONY • • • GRAY) . . . . . . .BLACKMAN. . . R1MA. . . . . . . . SILLS) . . . . .BURTON. . . . . _ DIEDRICH) . . . . .CLARK. . . . . DISTRICT 2 �WEDDLE) . . . . . . .COOPER. . . . GGRRO T�— . . .WEDAA. . . . . . . (SYLVIAI . . . . . . .COX. . . . . . . IIIOLLINDEN) . . . .SCOTT. . . . . . CULVER. . . . DIEDRICH) WILLIAMS) . . . . .DOSTAL. . . . . CLARK. . . . . . . GARTHE . . .EVANS . GARTHE� . . . . . . .EVANS. . . . . . . WEDDLE . . . . . . .FOX . . . . . . . . WEDDLE . . . . .FOX. . . . . . . . PRIEST . . . . . . .FRESE . . . - - DE J1 SUS) . . . . .HOLT. . . . . . . EVANS) . . . . . . . .GARTHE . . . . . THOr1 . . . . . . . . .KAYWOOD. . . . . GLOCKNER . . . PERRY. . . . . . DE J€SUS) . . . . .HOLT . . . . . (HOYT) . . . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . . THOM) . . . . . . . .KAYWOOD . TIPTON).. . . . . . .WINN. . . . • • • �LACAYO) . . . . . . .MAC LAIN . WARD) . . . . . . .WOOD. . . . . . . MC INNIS . GRAHAM) . . . . . . .YOUNG. . . . . . (DAVIS) . . . . . . . .MEYER . . . . . . DISTRICT 3 OLSON . . . . . . WARD —. . . . .WOOD. . . . . . (WIEDER) • • • • " 'PERRY. . . . . ) HOLLINDEN) . . . .SVALSTAD. . . . (DIEDRICH) . . . . .RILEY. . . . . . GRAY) . . . . . . .BLACKMAN. . . . RIMA . . . . . . WEDDLE� . . . . . . .COOPER. . . . . . DOSTA�) . . . . . . .RYCKOFF. . . . SYLVIA .COX. . EDGAR . . . :SALTARELLI . CULVER. . . . . DIEDRICH) . . .SCHr1iT. . . . . -- iGARTHE� . . . . . . .EVANS. . : . �HOLLItDEN) . . . .SCOTT. . . . . . PRIEST .FRESE. . . EDGAR)) . . . . . . .SHARP. . . THOM) . . . . . . . . . KAYWOOD. . . . SHENKMAN. . . LACAYO) . . . . . . .MAC LAIN. . . HOYT) . . . . . . . . .SMITH. . . . . DAVIS) . . . . . . . .MEYER. . . . . . YOUNG) . . . . . .STEVENS. . . . OLSON- . . . . . �HOLLINDEN) . . . .SVALSTAD. . . WIEDER) . . . . . . .PATTINSO"l. . . GROOT) . . - - . . . .W.EDAA. . . . . . DIEDR CH) . . . . .SCHMIT. . . . . . �MILLER) . . . . . . .WEISHAUPT. . YOUNG . . . . . . .STEVENS. . . . WIEDER. . . . . MILLER) . . . . . . .WEISHAUPT. . TIPTON) . . . . . . .WINN. . . . . . . WARD) . . . . . . .WOOD. . . . . . DISTRICT 5 GRAHAM) . . . . . . .YOUNG. . . . . . MC INNIS. . . . SDIEDRICH� . . . . .RILEY. . . . . . (WILLIAMS . . . . .DOSTAL. . . . . . OTHERS DISTRICT 6 HARPER RIMA• • . . . SYLVESTER It cC `� '' LEWIS (DOSTAL) . . . . . . .RYCKOFF• • • • • CLARKE (DIEDRICH). . . . . ANTHONY • • • • �'�' BROWN DISTRICT 7 -- EDGAR . . . . . . . SALTARELLI. . DOSTA ) . . . . . . .BARRETT. . . . . ' �— WOODRUFF SILL S. . . • • • •BURTON. . . . . DIEDRiCH). • • • •CLARK• . • . • . HOWARD �J�� HOWARD EVANS) . . . . . • • •GARTHE. . . . . ✓ HUNT GLOCKNER• - • a- KEITH (HOYT). . . . . . . . .SMITH• • • • • • �— KENNEY LYNCH DISTRICT 11 MADDOX (DIEDRI�-. . . SCHMIT. . . . . . MARTINSON SHENKMAN. . . . PIERSALL WIEDER. . . . . . STEVENS TRAVERS DISTRICT 8 D(—IEDRICH). • • • • RILEY. . . . . . . EDWARDS. . . . . —_ (JOHNSON). . . . . .SWEENEY. . . . . 12/8/76 RE: AGENDA ITEM #3(f) Proposed Orange Park Acres Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings Orange Park Acres Annexation No. S1 Summary of Board Actions to date July 9, 1976 Received, filed and referred for study the proposal from Orange Park Association August 13, 1976 Reviewed and studied proposal and alternatives with pro- ponents August 20, 1976 Provided for proponent to deposit funds to cover all costs of proceedings relative to the proposed concurrent annexa- tion and bond authorization proceedings; and, Authorized engagement of engineers to prepare engineering report and environmental impact report including enconomic impact analysis January 14, 1976 Received and filed letter from George Rach, Chairman of the Orange Park Acres Planning Committee, requesting annexation of the Orange Park Acres Area. The Board then requested additional information prior to further consi- deration of the request February 11, 1976 Further considered the proposal and deferred action until March 10, 1976 March 10, 1976 Received and filed communications from the Districts, General Counsel and the attorney for the proponents and, following considerable discussion, adopted Resolution No. 76-53-7 authorizing initiation of annexation pro- ceedings for the Orange Park Acres Area and filing with the Local Agency Information Commission July 14, 1976 Following further debate on the proposed procedures adopted Resolution No. 76-128-7, directing the Districts Chief Engineer to prepare the Engineering Report for the proposed Improvement District as required by the Cali- fornia Health and Safety Code, Seciton 4748, in connec- tion with proposed Annexation No. 51 - Orange Park Acres Annexation; and, Adopted Resolution No. 76-129-7, determining that the Engineering Report of the Districts' Chief Engineer relating to the proposed Improvement District - Annexa- tion No. Sl, complies with provisions of the County Sani- tation Districts Act, and fixing August 11, 1976, as the time for hearing objections thereto August 11, 1976 Following lengthy discussions of the proposal at the hear- ing, adopted, Resolution No. 76-147-7, approving and .r adopting the Engineers Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement District. Summary of Board Actions to date (cont.) September 8, 1976 Received and filed report of the General Counsel rela- tive to the proposed annexation and directed prepara- tion of information to be provided property owners relative to the proposed annexation and improvement district proceedings setting forth all information on the facilities to be provided pursuant to the pro- posed proceedings, and the local sewers that would have to be provided under separate financing arrangements to enable all properties to connect to the trunk system, and the total cost to the property owners October 27, 1976 Approved, with modifications to clarify, the informational material to be provided property owners relative to the public hearing regarding the proposal; and, Declared intent to adhere to a schedule of deadlines necessary to place the proposal on the ballot for the March, 1977, general election; and, Engaged the firm of Wilson, Jones, Morton and Lynch to prepare necessary documentation and procedures for the concurrent annexation and bond authorization proceedings November 10, 1976 Received, filed and adopted the Schedule of Proposed Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings; and, Adopted Resolution No. 76-200-7, initiating proceedings ..r for annexation of territory, determining the necessity to incur a bonded indebtedness of a portion of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and of in- tention to form Improvement District No. 7-1, and fixing time and place of hearing thereon as December 16, 1976, at Fire Station No. 23; and, Adopted Resolution No. 76-202-7, making application for modification of terms and conditions together with the boundaries relating to Annexation No. 51 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 .� DISTRICT No. 7 9540-2910 62-24111 IIAGENDA PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED CONCURRENT ANNEXATION AND BOND AUTHORIZATION - ORANGE PARK ACRES AREA TIME: 8:00 P. M. , THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1976 PLACE: FIRE STATION N0. 23 5020 SANTIAGO BOULEVARD VILLA PARK (SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE) (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Public Hearing re Proposed Concurrent Annexation and Bond Authorization Proceedings - Orange Park Acres Annexation No. 51 (a) Open hearing ..r (b) Summary of resolution making determination (c) Summary of proceedings to date by District's Chairman (d) Review of engineering requirements to provide sanitary sewers for Orange Park Acres area by District's Engineer (e) Review of proposal by District's Bond Counsel (f) Review of Board actions to date by District's Secretary (g) Consideration of written protests, if any (h) Consideration of oral protests, if any (i) If a majority protest is not deemed to exist, then hearing may be closed and Board may proceed to consider adoption of Resolution No. , a resolution of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, making determinations, ordering annexation of territory subject to confirmation of voters, establishing terms and conditions of annexation, describing exterior boundaries of territory annexed, and calling special improvement district bond election; OR If a majority protest is deemed to exist, then hearing should be continued to to determine the sufficiency of the protests. (4) Other business and communications (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn to time and place to be determined by the Board (if hearing is continued) SANTIAGO BLVD p TAFT AVE a 2 VILLA PARK RD n KATELLA AVE I ORANGE PARK ACRES •.,, COLLINS AVE ?� • N t .W H N w cn cn rI cr W J CHAPMAN " AVE = m ' FIRE STATION LA VETA 0 9y GgRDLLN GROVE fRWY a I7TH r, ST VILLA PARK R D Wy z ►= Q� o I ST �'` ST GO v ` gP 24v MC FADDEN AVE ORANGE PARK ACRES PUBLIC HEARING EDINGER AVE DECEMBER 16 , 1976 8 : 00 PM FIRE STATION NO. 23 5020 SANTIAGO BLVD. VILLA PARK, CA. CSD #7 Meeting of 12/16/76 Public Hearing on Proposed After introduction of District Directors, Concurrent Annexation and staff and legal counsel the Chairman Bozm4- Authorization re Orange declared the hearing on the proposed Park Acres Annexation No. 51 Concurrent Annexation and JWwrd Authori- zation - Orange Park Acres Annexation No. 51 - open at 8:10 p.m. The Chair then recognized the Districts General Counsel who summarized the resolution making determination re said proposal. Following a review of the procedings to date by Chairman Saltarelli, Mr. Conrad Hohener, Districts' Consulting Engineer, reviewed the engineering requirements to provide sanitary sewers for the Orange Park Acres area. The Chair then recognized the Districts' Special Bond Counsel who reviewed the proposal; and vemimmag the findings of the Orange County Health Department dated February 12, 1972, and December 15, 1976, concerning sewerage problems in the Orange Park Acres area. The Districts' Secretary then summarized the actions taken to date by the Board relative to the proposed concurrent Annexation and bond Authorization. The Chairman then called for oral comments following which a lengthy discussion and question and answer period took place, including an explanation of what would constitute a majority protest for purposes of determining whether or not the proceedings would be terminated or an election called. Thomas J. Skane, Jr. , Attorney at Law, also addressed the Board and stated that he had been engaged by several property owners in the proposed improve- ment district and was in the process of circulating petitions in protest of the proposal. He requested that Directors continue the hearing to allow 12/16/76 sufficient time for the petitions to be returned. Upon questioning Mr. Skane stated that he was not at liberty to disclose the identity of the Protestants. Upon advice of the General Counsel the chairman then called for any and all written protests to be filed with the Secretary. The Secretary then read the following written communications: In support of proposal: Letter dated December 16, 1976, from C. D. Williamson, 10444 Randall Orange. Letter dated December 16, 1976, from Lorene A. Quarton, 11113 Meads Ave. , Orange. Letter dated December 16, 1976, from William W. Quarton, 11113 Meads Ave. Orange. In protest of proposal: — Thomas J. Skane, Jr. , Attorney at Law, dated December 16, 1976, on behalf of undisclosed group of property owner- residents in the area. Petition dated December 13, 1976, signed — by M. B. Watts, 20322 Randall Street, and Robert P. and June E. Shelly, 10391 So. Randall, Orange. Letter dated December 16, 1976, from William E. Peaker, 10462 Marada Dr. , Orange. - Letter dated December 8, 1976, from Milton Garrett, 20212 Amapola, Orange The Secretary also read a letter dated December 10, 1976, signed by Fred A. Harper, General Manager of the District, in response to the communication from Milton Garrett. The Chairman then called for all those wishing to orally protest to come forward and register their name and address, following which he declared the hearing closed at 10:15=p.m. 6 The General Counsel then reported that all written and oatenotests had Z. .. been tabulated, including 89 written petitionspsigned by 100 property owners and/or registered voters, 32 oral protests by registered voters, and 25 oral protests by property owners. He stated that although there appeared to be 12/16/76 duplications, none had been eliminated for purposes of calculating the number of protestants Mr. Woodruff then declared that, based upon the unofficial results of the tabulation, in his opinion both the number of protests of registered voters, and the assessed value of the land of protesting property owners was, in fact, significantly less than 50% in each instance. Note, final tabulation is as follows: Required for Value/Number % of Total.5 Majority Protest of Protestant O Protestants;, Registered VotersO 570 286 115 ` 20.2% A. V. of board $3,382,500,C- $1,691,251,C' $ 630,700 ,r- 18.6%=> It was then moved that the hearing be continued for one week. Said motion died for lack of a second. C-�i 12/16/76 Finding that a majority It was then moved, seconded and unanimously protest re proposes carried by roll call vote: Concurrent Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby finds and Bond Authorization that the protests filed against the Proceedings - Orange Proposed Concurrent Annexation and Bond Park Acres Annexation Authorization Proceedings - Orange Park No. 51-does not exist Acres Annexation No. S1, are not sufficient to constitute a majority protest of either registered voters or the assessed value of land within the proposed annexa- tion, pursuant to Government Code Section 56316. Ordering Concurrent Annexation It was then moved, seconded and unanimously and Improvement District Bond carried by roll call vote: Authorization re Orange Park That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution Acres Annexation No. 51� No. 76-215-7, making determinations, ordering subject to confirmation of annexation of territory subject to confirma- voters, and calling election tion of voters, establishing terms and therefor conditions of annexation, describing exterior boundaries of territory annexed, and calling special improvement district bond election. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this adjourned meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:25 p.m. , December 16, 1976.