HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-11-24l
I
ColJNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF .. bRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
November 18, 1976
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 5
WEDNESDAY} NOVEMBER 24} 1976 -5:00 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY} CALIFORNIA
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of N0vember 10, 1976, the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Ne. 5 will r.icet in an
adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.
JWS:rb
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICT NO. 5
Adjourned Regular Meeting
November 24 , 1976 -5:00 p .m.
No. 2 -Financial Statement of NIWA .
Post Office Box 81 2 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Founta in Valley, Cal if., 92708
Teleprcnes:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
Enclosed for the Directors are copies of the Financial
Statement of the Newport -Irvine Waste Management Plann ing Agency
for the period March 28, 1975 through June 30, 1976. The agenda
action is to receive and file the financial statements .
No. 3 -General Counsel's Report re Agreement for Annexation
of the Down -Coast Area to the Dist rict .
Mr. Woodruff has prepared an 8th revision of the pro posed
agreement for the annexation of 3 ,44 2 acres of coastal territory
between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach . The Irvine Company pro -
poses to annex the entire area, 3,442 acres. However, the annexa-
tion fee will be paid for the planned urbanized area which is some
1500 plus acres . The planned open space area wi l l be legally de -
scribed and a covenant wil l be placed on the open space areas which
provides that in the event any of the open space area requires sewer
services, a fee equal to the then applicable annexation fees will
be due. This is more specifically described i n Paragraph 9 of the
enclosed version .
If this agreement is satisfac tory to the Directors, t h e other
actions appearing on the agenda relative to this annexation , known
as proposed Annexatlon No. 7 to District No . 5, are recommended.
No. 7 -. ·status· ·or co·astal ·p e ·rmi t for Construction of the Back
Bat Trunk Sewer.
On November 15, the Coastal Commission was scheduled to hear
the District's reques t for a permit to construct the Back Bay
Gravity Trunk Sewer . However, by 3:00 p.m. Monday, the Commission
failed to have a quorum; therefore we requested the hearing be held
ove r to the Commission's November 22nd meeting in Torrance . Th e
staff will report on the outcome of th e hearing at Wednesday 's
meeting .
Fred A. ·Harper
General Ma n ager
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICT No. 5
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 24, 1976 -5:00 P.M.
(1) Roll Call
Post Office Box (J 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones: -, _.
Area Code 714 ·
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statements
of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period
March 28, 1975, to June 30, 1976. See page "Arr
(3) Report of General Counsel re proposed agreement with The Irvine Company
and the Irvine Ranch Water District relative to conditions for annexa-
tion of the down-coast area to the District
(4) Discussion re conditions of annexation
(5) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-177-5,· establishing conditions and
approving agreement with The Irvine ~ompany and the Irvine Ranch Water
District relative to annexation of the down-coast area to the District,
in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "B"
(Copy of agreement enclosed with agenda material)
(6) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-194 -5, ordering annexation of 3,442
acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Be a ch to
the District (Proposed Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 5) See page "C"
(7) Staff report on status of California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission
permit in connection with construction of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer
(8) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(9) Consideration of motion to adjourn
"A-1"
ERNST & ERNST
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1000
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
Board of Directors
Newport-Irvine Waste-Management
Planning Agency
Newport Beach, California
We have examined the balance sheet of the Newport-Irvine
Waste-Management Planning Agency Ge neral Fund as of June 30, 1976, ·
an<l the related statement of revenues and expenditures for the ·
period from March 28, 1975 (date of formation) to June 30, 1976.
O~r examination was made in accordance with generally accepted ·
auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the
accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to
above present fairly the financial position of the Newport-Irvine
Waste-Management Planning Agency General Fund as of June 30, 1976 ,
and the results of operations for the period from March 28, 1975
to June 30, 1976, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Santa Ana, California
September 14, 1976
AGEND A ITEM #2 "A-1 "
. " A-2"
Cash
BALANCE SHEET
NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-HANAGENENT PLANNING AGENCY
GENERAL FUND
June 30, 1976
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Payable to Irvine Ranch Water District
See notes to financial statements •
AGENDA ITEM #2
·.
"A-2"
"A-3"
STATl.:.r-IBNT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
N"EWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-W\NAGEHENT PLANNING AGENCY
GENERAL FUND
Period from March 28, 1975 to June 30, 1976
Revenues:
Contributions from members:
Irvine Ranch Water District
City of Newport Beach
Orange County Water District
County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County
Expenditures -Note B:
Reimbursement to the Irvine Ranch
Water District for legal and professional
fees
See notes to financial statements.
AGENDA ITEM #2
$2,000
2,000
2,000
_ ..
'"-"
~)000 $8 ,ooo
~
"-"'
...._.,
'-"
"A-3"
....,
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATE~fENTS
NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PLA.t.~ING AGENCY
June 30, l976 and 1975
NOTE A ORGANIZATION A.i.~D HISTORY
Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency is a Joint Powers
Agency which was formed on March 28, 1975. Since its formation, the Agency
has been involved in planning for the collection, treatraent, disposal and
reclamation of waste-water in the San Diego Creek -Newport Bay area.
NOTE B -FORMATION COSTS
During the period from March.28, 1975 to June 30, 1976, the Agency
~incurred approximately $30,000 in formation costs primarily for legal and
professional services. These costs were paid by the Irvine Ranch Water Dis-
trict (IRWD) on the Agency's behalf and are subject to reimbursement, upon
approval by the Board of Directors, to IRWD out of funds received for that
purpose, if any. As of June.30, 1976, the Agency's Board of Directors has
authorized that IRWD be reimbursed $8,000 for these costs.
~
.._,
~
"A-4" AGENDA ITEM #2 II A-4"
"B"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-177-5
APPROVING AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS
OF ANNEXATION NO. 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH
IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS RE ANNEXATION NO. 7 -
IRVINE COASTAL AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, The Irvine Company has heretofore requested annexation of approx-
imately 3,442 acres of its coastal property located between·Corona del Mar
and Laguna Beach to the District; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has
heretofor authorized initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the
District; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has
heretofor declared that annexation of said territory to the District shall be
subject to conditions established by the Board of Directors.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California;
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the agreement dated , by and between County --------------------
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, The Irvine Company and the Irvine
Ranch Water District establishing conditions re Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal
Area Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5, is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, on
behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 24, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #5 "B"
"C-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-194-5
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 7)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 7 -IRVINE COASTAL
AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 5)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of county Sanitation District No.
5 of Orange County, C~lifornia.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to
County Sanitation District No. 5 for annexation of said terri-
tory to the District by means of a petition filed by the
property owner; and,
Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Re-
organization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of
the State of California, application has heretofore been made
to the Local Agency Formation Corrunission for annexation of
said territory to County Sanitation District No. 5 by means of
Resolution No. 76-176-5, filed with said Corrunission by the
District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Corrunission
to the territory proposed to be annexed is Annexation No. 7 -
I
Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to county Sanitation District
AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-1"
"C-2"
No. 5, the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by
reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is
to obtain and provide public s~nitary sewer service to said
territory; and,
· Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees
and conditions of said annexation have heretoforebeen established
by the Board and are set forth in that certain agreement dated
by and between county Sanitation District
No. 5, The Irvine Company, and the Irvine Ranch Water District;
and,
Section 7. That in accordance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and the
adopted Guidelines for Environmental Impact Reports adopted by
the County of orange Local Agency Formation Commission and the
District, it has been determined that the Local Agency Formation
Commission constitutes the lead agency for this project, and
has determined that a negative declaration should properly
issue. The Directors have reviewed and considered the negative
declaration for environmental impact issued by the county of
orange Local Agency Formation Conunission, and concur with the
findings therein and hereby approve said negative declaration
on the basis that the project will not have a significant effect
on the environment; and,
-2-
AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-2"
"C-3"
Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the
Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1
(District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Govern-
ment Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred
to and' described hereinabove, be it is hereby ordered annexed
to County Sanitation District No. 5 without notice or hearing
and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held
-3-
AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-3"
i'ifth
tevision
~0/07/76
...,,
Sixth l
Revi~ion
10/08/76 2
Seventh 3
Re\rision
11/08/76 4
Eighth 5
Revision
11/18/76 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
L~ 26
27
28
29
30
31
32
of
RE: AGENDA ITEM #5
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day
~~~~~~~~' 1976, by and between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, herein-
after referred to as "District";
THE IRVINE COMPANY, a West Virginia .
corporation, hereinafter referred to
as 11 Irvine"; and
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, herein-
after referred to as 11 IRWD 11
•
WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable provisions of law
and the resolutions and policies of District, Irvine has filed
an application to annex certain real properties to District for
purposes of receiving sewer services for said properties; and
WHEREAS, Irvine has filed application with the Orange
County Local Agency Formation Commission for approval of the
annexation to District; and
WHEREAS, Irvine proposes to annex 3,442 acres of land
(hereinafter referred.to as the "Territory"), owned by Irvine,
to District; and
WHEREAS, the Territory is also within the boundaries of
IRWD for the purpose of obtaining from IRWD water and sewer
service, and such service is conditional per that certain con-
tract between IRWD and the city of Newport Beach, dated
September 11, 1972, as amended September 10, 1973; and
WHEREAS, the plan proposed by Irvine for the Territory,
attached as Exhibit "C", provides for development for urban land
use of approximately 1,535 acres (hereinafter referred to as
the "Urban Area"), with the remaining 1,907 acres to be kept
in conservation and open space uses (hereinafter referred to
as the "Open Space Area"); and
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
. ..,,,,
26
27
28
29
30
31
52
WHEREAS, Irvine has proposed to immediately pay all
current annexation charges for the Urban Area and has requested
an indefinite deferral of payment of the annexation charges
for the Open Space Area, and has proposed that the payment of
such deferred annexation charges shall be made as set forth
in Paragraph 9 hereof; and
WHEREAS, District has determined that annexation of the
Territory to District can only be in the best interests of the
other property owners and taxpayers of the District if the
organization and directorship of the District remains intact
as presently constituted; and
WHEREAS, District, Irvine and IRWD have each undertaken
studies to determine the feasibility and desirability of
annexing said Territory to District; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by District, Irvine and
IRWD that it is necessary to execute an agreement pertaining
to the respective rights, duties and obligations, both presently
and prospectively, of each of the parties hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Irvine and IRWD shall comply with all provisions of
Resolution No. 75-15-5 of District pertaining to the annexa-
tion policy of the District.
2. District agrees that as to the 3,442 acres of area
requested to be annexed by Irvine, and which is more particu-
larly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit
"B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
District will pursue annexation proceedings, seek approval by
the orange county Local Agency Formation Commission and there-
after diligently pursue all other proceedings and procedures
to completion.
-2-
l 3. IRWD may provide local sewers and facilities within
2 the Territory in order to provide service to the developed areas
3 and may connect said facilities to District's master plan
4 sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules and regula-
5 tions of District in effect on the date of connection.
6 4. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that District was created
7 and exists pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act
8 (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et~-).
9 5. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that IRWD is not a sani-
10 tary district as that term is defined and intended by the County
11 sanitation District Act; and therefore is not entitled to
12 select and appoint a member to the governing board of District
13 as prescribed by Section 4730 of said Act.
14 6. Within ninety (90) days of the date of District's
15 action ordering said annexation, Irvine shall pay to District
16 annexation fees in the sum of Two Million One Hundred Thirty-
17 Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety and 00/100 ($2,139,790.00)
18 Dollars. These fees are payable on the basis of the current
19 rate of One Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Four and 00/100
20 ($1,394.00) Dollars per acre for the Urban Area proposed to
21 be developed within the annexation territory. The parties
22 acknowledge that the exact boundary description and acreage
23 of the Urban Area are not yet certified and are subject to
24 future charge. Upon certification of the final acreage, the
25 total fees shall be calculated and payment of the difference
26 from the amount set forth above shall be made to the District
27 or Irvine within thirty (30) days thereafter.
28 7. The annexation fees due to District pursuant to
29 Paragraph 6 hereof, may be paid in any manner determined by
30 Irvine: provided, however, that neither Irvine nor IRWD shall
31 cause any bonded indebtedness to be assessed and levied upon
32 the property within the Territory for payment of such annexation
-3-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~ 26
27
28
29
30
31
32
fees. The parties hereto further acknowledge that the annexa-
tion fees to be paid by Irvine are to acquire an interest in
existing District facilities, including the treatment works.
8. Payment of annexation fees that are due for the Open
Space Area, shall remain deferred until the occurrence of
such events as set forth in Paragraph 9 hereof. The payment
of such deferred annexation fees pursuant to this Paragraph
shall be secured by a covenant running with the land which
Irvine agrees to impose upon the Open Space Area by recording
concurrently with the completion of the pending annexation
proceedings for the 3,442 acres, a Declaration of Covenant
Running With the Land, substantially in the form set forth in
Exhibit 11 D 11
, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
9. No sewer service connecting to District facilities,
either directly or through a local sewer collection system,
shall be permitted in the Open Space Area, until an applica-
tion for approval is submitted by the owner to the District, or
its designated agent. The annexation fees which are deferred
pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall be paid by
the then owner of la·nd within thirty (30) days after receipt
of approval by District for sewer service or prior to the
connection to District's facilities, whichever is sooner.
The determination of the amount of annexation fees to be paid
by such owner, shall be on the basis of the then current annexa-
tion fee per acre, established and in force by the District
for annexations, multiplied by the number of acres submitted
in the application for sewer service; provided, however, that
if the number of acres for which application for sewer service
is requested is less than the number of acres beneficially
served by said connection, the Board of Directors of District
shall have the absolute power to determine a minimum acreage for
which the fees shall be paid in order to receive sewer service.
-4-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
~ 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
such determination shall be based upon a consideration of
relevant land use planning and engineering data, including
the contemplated land use within the Open Space Area which
will be beneficially served by the connection, the projected
amount of average dry weather sewer flow from said area, the
design flow of the sewer line to be installed (specified in
total gallons per day), all of which shall be compared
with a similar projection on the basis that said service area
were to be developed with single family residential improve-
ments. These calculations shall be considered as a guideline
of the Board of Directors, but shall not be binding thereon.
10. In the event Irvine seeks to annex any portion of
the Territory included within this Agreement to any incor-
porated city other than the city of Newport Beach, it will
concurrently therewith support District's petition to the
orange County Local Agency Formation Commission or its suc-
cessors for approval of deannexation and/or detachment from
District of the same territory. that is requested to be
annexed to the city, provided that all required actions have
been taken by all necessary parties to permit the provisions
for service under Paragraph 11. In furtherance thereof,
Irvine and IRWD agree to execute any and all necessary docu-
ments to accomplish said deannexation/detachment of such area
from District.
11. Coincident with the occurrence of events as set forth
in Paragraph 10 above, and the completion of deannexation/
detachment proceedings from District, District shall immedia-
tely commence and continue to provide sewer service to the
same extent as received or capable of being provided by
District while said territory was included within District.
The specific terms and conditions of providing such service
shall be set forth in a written agreement on the basis of
-5-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
~ 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
sound engineering practices and at the same per unit service
cost as the overall District, plus a service charge of ten
(10%) percent, in accordance with the existing policy of the
Joint Boards relating to providing of service outside of
the District.
12. In the event Irvine annexs or attempts to annex some
portion of the Territory hereunder to a city other than the
City of Newport Beach, and fails to support deannexation/
detachment proceedings from District concurrently therewith
in accordance with the terms of Paragraphs 10 and 11 above,
or files objections or protests thereto, District shall be
entitled to initiate proceedings in the Superior Court of
the State of California to obtain necessary judicial orders
to immediately insure performance of this Agreement. Irvine
appears to pay all reasonable attorneys• fees and court costs
related to said proceedings.
13. Any notice or instrument required to be given or
delivered shall be deposited in any United States Post Office,
registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties hereto as follows:
TO DISTRICT
TO IRVINE
TO IRWD
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 Ellis Avenue, P.O. Box 8127
Fountain valley, ca. 92708
THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
P.O. Box D-1
Irvine, Ca. 92716
and shall be deemed to have been received by the party ad-
dressed at the expiration of 72 hours after deposit of same
in the Post Office.
14. If any portion of this Agreement is judicially
determined to be invalid or unenforceable, it is the intent
-6-
~
~
~
~
~
........
ill and declaration of the parties hereto that all other provisions
211 shall remain in full force and effect.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
3
4
5
6
7
APPROVED AS TO FORM: By
8 II Thomas L. Woodruff,
General Counsel
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
II
II
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
THE IRVINE COMPANY
By
By
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
By
By
-7-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts . Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
\. re ... "".)
cb
DISTRICT No. 5
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 24, 1976 -5:00 P.M.
Roll Call
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statements
of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period
March 28, 1975, to June 30, 1976. See page "A"
Report of General Counsel re proposed agreement with The Irvine Company
and the Irvine Ranch Water District relative to conditions for annexa-
tion of the down-coast area to the District
Discussion re conditions of annexation
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-177-5, establishing conditions and
approving agreement with The Irvine Company and the Irvine Ranch Water
District relative to annexation of the down-coast area to the District,
in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "B"
(Copy of agreement enclosed with agenda material)
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-194-5, ordering annexation of 3,442
acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to
the District (Proposed Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 5) See page "C"
(7) Staff report on status of California Coastal Zone Con servation Commission
permit in connection with construction of .the Back Bay Trunk Sewer
(8) Other bus iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(9) Consideration of motion to adjourn
·'-
"A-1"
ERNST & ERNST
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, S UITE 1000
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
Board of Directors
Newport-Irvine Waste-Management
Planning Agency
Newport Beach, California
-
We have examined the balance sheet of the Newport-Irvine
Waste-Management Planning Agency General Fund as of June 30, 1976,
and the related statement of r e venues and expenditures for the
period from March 28, 1975 (date_ of fonnation) to June 30, 1976.
O~r examination was made in accordance with generally accepted ·
auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the
accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we
cons id e r e d nece ssary in the circumstances .
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to
above pre sent fairly the financial position of the Newport-Irvine
Wa s te-Ma nagement Planning Agency General Fund as of June 30, 1976,
and the results of operations for the period from March 28, 1975
to June 30, 1976, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Santa Ana, California
Sep tember 14, 1976
AGENDA ITEM #2 "A-1"
. " A-2"
Cash
BALANCE SHEET
NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGE'l-1ENT PL.A.NNING AGENCY
GENERAL FUND
June 30, 1976
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Payable to Irvine Ranch Water District
See notes to financial statements •
AGENDA ITEM #2 "A-2"
"A-3"
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
t-rEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PLANNING AGENCY
GENERAL FUND
Period from March 28, 1975 to June 30, 1976
Revenues:
Contributions from members:
Irvine Ranch Water District
City of Newport Beach
Orange County Water District
County Sanitation District No.
Orange County
Expenditures -Note B:
Reimbursement to the Irvine Ranch
5 of
Water District for legal and professional
fees
•• .$'
See notes to financial statements.
AGENDA ITEM #2
·'-"
... $2,000
2,000
2,000
_1.,000 $8,000
'-"'
~
"A-3"
~
~
~
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PL!u~ING AGENCY
June 30, ·1976 and 1975
NOTE A -ORGANIZATION .Al.~D HISTORY
Ne-wport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency is a Joint Powers
Agency which was formed on March 28, 1975. Since its formation, the Agency
has been involved in planning for the collection, treatment, disposal and
reclamation of waste-water in the San Diego Creek -Newport Bay area.
NOTE B -FOR.J.'1ATION COSTS
During the period from March.28, 1975 to June 30, 1976, the Agency
incurred approximately $30,000 in formation costs primarily for legal and
professional services. These costs were paid by the Irvine Ranch Water Dis-
trict (IRWD) on the Agency's behalf and are subject to reimbursement, upon
approval by the Board of Directors, to IRWD out of funds received for that
purpose, if any. As of Jtine.30, 1976, the Agency's Board of Directors has
authorized that IRWD be reimbursed $8,000 for these costs.
"A-4" AGENDA ITEM #2 "A-4"
"B"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-177-5
APPROVING AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS
OF ANNEXATION NO. 7
A RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH
IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS RE ANNEXATION NO. 7 -
IRVINE COASTAL AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, The Irvine Company has heretofore requested annexation of approx-
imately 3,442 acres of its coastal property located between Corona del Mar
and Laguna Beach to the District; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has
heretofor authorized initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the
District; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has
heretofor declared that annexation of said territory to the District shall be
subject to conditions established by the Board of Directors.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California;
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the agreement dated , by and between County ------------------------
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, The Irvine Company and the Irvine
Ranch Water District establishing conditions re Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal
Area Annexation to CounLy Sanitation District No. 5, is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, on
behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 24, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #5 "B"
"C-1"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-194-5
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 7)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 7 -IRVINE COASTAL
AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 5)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
5 of Orange County, C~lifornia.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to
County Sanitation District No. 5 for annexation of said terri-
tory to the District by means of a petition filed by the
property owner; and,
Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Re-
organization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of
the State of California, application has heretofore been made
to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of.
said territory to County Sanitation District No. 5 by means of
Resolution No. 76-176-5, filed with said Commission by the
District; and,
section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission
to the territory proposed to be annexed is Annexation No. 7 -
I
Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to county Sanitation District
AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-1"
"C-2"
No. 5, the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit 11 A 11 and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by
reference made a part of this resolution; ·and,
section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is
to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said
territory; and,
· Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees
and conditions of said annexation have heretoforebeen established
by the Board and are set forth in that certain agreement dated
~~~~~~~~~~~~-
by and between county Sanitation District
No. 5, The Irvine Company, and the Irvine Ranch Water District;
and,
Section 7. That in accordance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and the
adopted Guidelines for Environmental Impact Reports adopted by
the County of Orange Local Agency Formation Commission and the
District, it has been determined that the Local Agency Formation
Commission constitutes the lead agency for this project, and
has determined that a negative declaration should properly
issue. The Directors have reviewed and considered the negative
declaration for environmental impact issued by the County of
orange Local Agency Formation Commission, and concur with the
findings therein and hereby approve said negative declaration
on the basis that the project will not have a significant effect
on the environment; and,
-2-
AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-2"
Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the
Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1
(District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Govern-
ment Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred
·. to and described hereinabove, be it is hereby ordered annexed
to County Sanitation District No. 5 without notice or hearing
and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held
-3-
"C-3" AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-3"
November 24, 1976
BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION -for Coastal Commission Hearing
November 29, 1976 in Torrance
ENERGY CONSUPMTION
Old Pump New Pump
Station Station
Kilowatt hours of Electricity 500,000 *650,000
Cost at 3¢ per Kilowatt hour $15,000 $20,000
Cubic Feet of Natural Gas 4 Million 5.3 Million
Barrels of Oil 1600 2150
*The old pump station is now pumping about 85% of the
expected average daily flows. The new pump station
calculations are figurea at 100% of the average daily
flow.
CAPACITY
Gravity
Line
0
0
0
0
The construction of the gravity line will leave an excess
capacity in the Jamboree Trunk that will never be utilized.
The service area for the Trunk is 150 acres and would only
require an 10" line instead of the Jamboree Trunk. The flows
are estimated to ultimately be 1.2 MGD for this area. If
necessary a portion of the line could be down-sized from
18" to 10" to satisfy the capacity issue.
--~_Part II-Tues., Nov. 23, 1976 R
'('.. . * JLcs ~~gclts ~imrs
CoastlBne Panelists Question Sewer Project
They Raise Objections to Line Near Upper Bay but Delay Decision
BY DALE FETHEHLING
Times Staff Writer
The South Coast Regional Coastline Commission, seem-
ingly about to deny a permit for a controversial sewer near
Upper Newport Bay, Monday delayed the decision a w_cek to
get more data on energy use. ·
. the commission, meeting in Torrance, heard a strong
recommendation from its staff against approval of the
$500,000 project proposf'd by the Orange County Sanitation
Districts. .
In sharp questioning, several commissioners also took
issue with the proposal designed to divert sewage around an
inadequate pump station on lower Jamboree Road. . .
OCSD General Manager Fred Harper expressed concern
over the reliability of the pump station system, which has
safer," he said, "then to go in there and start digging holes
around the bay."
But Robert Montgomery. regional manager of Fish and
Game, said he feared possible pollution from a pump station
failure more than possible damaging effects from the
pipel_ine construction. .
Other proponents said the short-teJ:m risks in building the
line were more than offset by the long-term savings in
energy that such a gravity line would provide.
But upon questioning. OCSD could not produce figures on
the amount of energy used by the present station _or would
be used by an expanded one. "If we have to make a decision
based on energy use, it's unfortunate we don't have all the
information,'1 Chairwoman Judy Rosener said.
already experienced overflows. · · TP.ough they appeared at one point on the verge of voting·
oCSD instead seeks to run a 24-inch gravity line down Big the project down, the commissioners, on a motion by
Canyon to Back Bay Drive and then aJong that road to. Laurence Schmit, a county supervisor, decided to postpone a
· Pacific Coast Highway. decision until next Monday's meeting at Torrance City Hall.
'l'he State Department of Fish and Game, which plans an If the ~reject i~ approv~d. OCSD h.as agreed to defer any
interpretative center near the mouth of Rig Canyon and·, con.struct1on until the migratory bird season ends next
could use the same utility right-of-way, favors the p1:ojcct' sprmg.
So docs the city of Newport Beach and the Friends of In another action, the commission Monday on a tic vote
Newport Bay, a conservationist group. denied a request to build a three-level home at 3611 Ocean
No one in the audience spoke in oppo3ition. Blvd., adjacent to Inspiration Point in Corona del ~Iar.
But the staff and some of the com1r.l:~~:ioners contended The applicant, Don Renner, said city, county and state
that ·the project would be grO\'rth-inducing and would risk plans to buy the property for a view park have not matcrial-
damage to the b:iy during construction. ized in more th:m three years. But a number of Commi::sion-
. Commissioners David Common2 doggedly suggested cr.s said the site still may be publicly purcha~ed and that
replacing and enlarging th0 pump station and paralleling building on the steep site could block views of the shoreline
· present lines along Jamboree. "That certainly would be and tide pools below.
Fifth
Revision
10/07/76
,_..,.. .. Sixth J.
Revision
10/08/76 2
Seventh 3
Revision
11/08/76 4
Eighth 5
Revision
11/18/76 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~ 26
27
28
29
30
31
32
of
RE: AGENDA ITEM #5
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day
~~~~~~~~-' 1976, by and between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, herein-
after referred to as "District";
THE IRVINE COMPANY, a West Virginia
corporation, hereinafter referred to
as "Irvine"; and
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, herein-
after referred to as "IRWD".
WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable provisions of law
and the resolutions and policies of District, Irvine has filed
an application to annex certain real properties to District for
purposes of receiving sewer services for said properties; and
WHEREAS, Irvine has filed application with the orange
County Local Agency Formation Commission for approval of the
annexation to District; and
WHEREAS, Irvine proposes to annex 3,442 acres of land
(hereinafter referred to as the "Territory"), owned by Irvine,
to District; and
WHEREAS, the Territory is also within the boundaries of
IRWD for the purpose of obtaining from IRWD water and sewer
service, and such service is conditional per that certain con-
tract between IRWD and the City of Newport Beach, dated
September 11, 1972, as amended September 10, 1973; and
WHEREAS, the plan proposed by Irvine for the Territory,
attached as Exhibit "C", provides for development for urban land
use of approximately 1,535 acres (hereinafter referred to as
the "Urban Area"), with the remaining 1,907 acres to be kept
in conservation and open space uses (hereinafter referred to
as the "Open Space Area"); and
1 WHEREAS, Irvine has proposed to immediately pay all
2 current annexation charges for the Urban Area and has requested
3 an indefinite deferral of payment of the annexation charges
4 for the Open Space Area, and has proposed that the payment of
5 such deferred annexation charges shall be made as set forth
6 in Paragraph 9 hereof; and
7 WHEREAS, District has determined that annexation of the
8 Territory to District can only be in the best interests of the
9 other property owners and taxpayers of the District if the
10 organization and directorship of the District remains intact
11
12
13
as presently constituted; and
WHEREAS, District, Irvine and IRWD have each undertaken
studies to determine the feasibility and desirability of
14 annexing said Territory to District; and
15 WHEREAS, it has been determined by District, Irvine and
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
IRWD that it is necessary to execute an agreement pertaining
to the respective rights, duties and obligations, both presently
and prospectively, of each of the parties hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Irvine and IRWD shall comply with all provisions of
Resolution No. 75-15-5 of District pertaining to the annexa-
tion policy of the District.
2. District agrees that as to the 3,442 acres of area
requested to be annexed by Irvine, and which is more particu-
larly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit
"B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
District will pursue annexation proceedings, seek approval by
the orange county Local Agency Formation Commission and there-
after diligently pursue all other proceedings and procedures
to completion.
-2-
l 3. IRWD may provide local sewers and facilities within
2 the Territory in order to provide service to the developed areas
3 and may connect said facilities to District's master plan
4 sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules and regula-
5 tions of District in effect on the date of connection.
6 4. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that District was created
7 and exists pursuant to the county Sanitation District Act
8 (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et~-).
9 5. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that IRWD is not a sani-
10 tary district as that term is defined and intended by the County
11 Sanitation District Act; and therefore is not entitled to
12 select and appoint a member to the governing board of District
13 as prescribed by Section 4730 of said Act.
14 6. Within ninety (90) days of the date of District's
15 action ordering said annexation, Irvine shall pay to District
16 annexation fees in the sum of Two Million One Hundred Thirty-
17 Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety and 00/100 ($2,139,790.00)
18 Dollars. These fees are payable on the basis of the current
19 rate of One Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Four and 00/100
20 ($1, 394. 00) Dollars per acre for the Urban Area prop.osed to
21 be developed within the annexation territory. The parties
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
acknowledge that the exact boundary description and acreage
of the Urban Area are not yet certified and are subject to
future charge. Upon certification of the final acreage, the
total fees shall be calculated and payment of the difference
from the amount set forth above shall be made to the District
or Irvine within thirty (30) days thereafter.
7. The annexation fees due to District pursuant to
Paragraph 6 hereof, may be paid in any manner determined by
Irvine; provided, however, that neither Irvine nor IRWD shall
cause any bonded indebtedness to be assessed and levied upon
the property within the Territory for payment of such annexation
-3-
~ l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
fees. The parties hereto further acknowledge that the annexa-
tion fees to be paid by Irvine are to acquire an interest in
existing District facilities, including the treatment works.
8. Payment of annexation fees that are due for the Open
Space Area, shall remain deferred until the occurrence of
such events as set forth in Paragraph 9 hereof. The payment
of such deferred annexation fees pursuant to this Paragraph
shall be secured by a covenant running with the land which
Irvine agrees to impose upon the Open Space Area by recording
concurrently with the completion of the pending annexation
proceedings for the 3,442 acres, a Declaration of Covenant
Running With the Land, substantially in the form set forth in
Exhibit 11 D 11
, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
9. No sewer service connecting to District facilities,
either directly or through a local sewer collection system,
shall be permitted in the Open Space Area, until an applica-
tion for approval is submitted by the owner to the District, or
its designated agent. The annexation fees which are deferred
pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall be paid by
the then owner of land within thirty (30) days after receipt
of approval by District for sewer service or prior to the
connection to District's facilities, whichever is sooner.
The determination of the amount of annexation fees to be paid
by such owner, shall be on the basis of the then current annexa-
tion fee per acre, established and in force by the District
for annexations, multiplied by the number of acres submitted
in the application for sewer service; provided, however, that
if the number of acres for which application for sewer service
is requested is less than the number of acres beneficially
served by said connection, the Board of Directors of District
shall have the absolute power to determine a minimum acreage for
which the fees shall be paid in order to receive sewer service.
-4-
l Such determination shall be based upon a consideration of
2 relevant land use planning and engineering data, including
3 the contemplated land use within the Open Space Area which
4 will be beneficially served by the connection, the projected
5 amount of average dry weather sewer flow from said area, the
6 design flow of the sewer line to be installed (specified in
7 total gallons per day), all of which shall be compared
8 with a similar projection on the basis that said service area
9 were to be developed with single family residential improve-
10 ments. These calculations shall be considered as a guideline
11 of the Board of Directors, but shall not be binding thereon.
12 10. In the event Irvine seeks to annex any portion of
13 the Territory included within this Agreement to any incor-
14 porated city other than the City of Newport Beach, it will
15 concurrently therewith support District's petition to the
16 Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission or its suc-
17 cessors for approval of deannexation and/or detachment from
18 District of· the same territory. that is requested to be
19 annexed to the City, provided that all required actions have
20 been taken by all necessary parties to permit the provisions
21 for service under Paragraph 11. In furtherance thereof,
22 Irvine and IRWD agree to execute any and all necessary docu-
23 ments to accomplish said deannexation/detachrnent of such area
24 from District.
25 11. Coincident with the occurrence of events as set forth
26 in Paragraph 10 above, and the completion of deannexation/
27 detachment proceedings from District, District shall irnrnedia-
28 tely commence and continue to provide sewer service to the
29 same extent as received or capable of being provided by
30 District while said territory was included within District.
31 The specific terms and conditions of providing such service
32 shall be set forth in a written agreement on the basis of
-5-
....,,. .
J.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
"-""' 26
27
28
29
30
31
32
sound engineering practices and at the same per unit service
cost as the overall District, plus a service charge of ten
(10%) percent, in accordance with the existing policy of the
Joint Boards relating to providing of service outside of
the District.
12. In the event Irvine annexs or attempts to annex some
portion of the Territory hereunder to a city other than the
city of Newport Beach, and fails to support deannexation/
detachment proceedings from District concurrently therewith
in accordance with the terms of Paragraphs 10 and 11 above,
or files objections or protests thereto, District shall be
entitled to initiate proceedings in the Superior Court of
the State of California to obtain necessary judicial orders
to immediately insure performance of this Agreement. Irvine
appears to pay all reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs
related to said proceedings.
13. Any notice or instrument required to be given or
delivered shall be deposited in any United States Post Office,
registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties hereto as follows:
TO DISTRICT
TO IRVINE
TO IRWD
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 Ellis Avenue, P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
P.O. Box D-1
Irvine, Ca. 92716
and shall be deemed to have been · received by the party ad-
dressed at the expiration f o 72 hours after deposit of same
in the Post Office.
14. If any portion of this Agreement is judicially
determined to be invalid or unenforceable, it is the intent
-6-
,; ~ -
111 and declaration of the parties hereto that all other provisions
211 shall remain in full force and effect.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By~~~~~~~~
3
4
5
6
7
APPROVED AS TO FORM: By~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
8 II Thomas L. Woodruff,
General Counsel
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
.28
29
30
31 II II
32 II
THE IRVINE COMPANY
By __ _
By· _____ _
IRVINE RANCH WA TER DI STRICT
By __
By~~~~~~~~-
-7-
Cqastline Panelists Question Sewer Project
.... ' .....
They Raise Obje~tions to Line .N.ear Upper Bay but Delay Decision
.BY. DALE FETHERLING safer," he said, "then to go in there and start digging holes
Time~ Slaff Writer _ . , around the bay." . ,
The South Coast Regional' Coastline Commission, seem-But Robert Montgomery, regional manager of Fish and
'ingly about to ·deny a permit for a controversial SElwer nea,r Game, said he feared possible pollution from a pump station
Upper ·Newport Bay, Monday delayed the decision a w:eek to failure more than possible damaging effects from the
get more data on energy use. · . . ; pip~line construction.
T.he commission, meeting in Torrance, heard a strong other proponents said the short-tettn riskS in building the
recommendation from its staff against approval of the line were ·moi:e than offset by the long-term savings in
$500,000 project proposed by t.lfe Orai;ige County Sanitation energy that sµch a gravity line ~ould provide.
Distncts. · . . . . : But upon questioning,'OCSD could not prOduce figures on
. In sh~tp quest1emng, s~vera l ~oww~ss1oners also took the amount of energy used by the present station ,?r would ~ssu~ with the propos~l ctes1gned to 9rv~rt sewage around an . be used by an expanded one. "If w~ have to make a decision
inadequate pump station on lower Jam"?dree Road. ·" ·· 'based on energy use , it's unfortunate we don't have all the
OCSD General Manager Fred Harper expressed corij!ern ihlOrmation " Chairwoman Judy Rosener said.
over the reliability of the pump station system, which has ' ·
already experienced overflows. · · TlJ.ough they .appeared at one point on the verge of voting·
oCsD instead seeks to run a 24-inch gravity ·line down Big the project do_wn, the commis~ioners •. on a motion by
Canyon to Back Bay Drive and then along that road to . La~~~nceS~hmit,acounty 1supen:1sor,dec1dedto~tponea
· Pacific Coast Highway. · · · dec1s1on unt~ next Mondays meeting at Torrance City Hall.
The State Department of Fish and Game, which plans an • If the ~roJect 1~ ?-pprov~d, OCSD h.as agreed to defern an~
interpretative center near the mouth of Big Can yon and 1 con.struct1on until the migratory bird season ends ex ..
could· use tbe same utility right-of-way, favors the p~oject r spring ..
So does the. city of Newport Beac h and the Friends of In ano ther action, the commission Monday on a tie vote
NewportBay,.a conservationist gro up. / denied a request to build a three-level home at 3611 Ocean
.No one in the,audience spoke in opposition. I Blvd., adjacent to Inspi!ation Point in Corona del Mar.
But'tl).e staff and som~ of the commissioners contend~d The applicant, Don Renner, said city, county and state
tliat 'the pro.ject would be growth~'i.nducjng .and would risk plans to buy 'the prop erty for a view park have not material-
damage to the bay during construct ion." · . ized in mo re than three years. But a number of Commission-.
· Commi8sioners Dav id Commons doggedly suggested e r s said the site still may be publicly purchased and that
re~l~cing .and enlarging the pump station and paral!~ling buiJdiI)g on the steep site could block views of the shoreline
' present ·lines along Jamboree. "That certainly would be and tide pool s below.
•.
..
fiEETIN G DATE _N ovember 24, 1 976 Tii"[ 5:00 p.m . D I STH I CTS 5 ----I
nis:r1nc T i
(ty°AN~ · · · · Gf\RTHE · • • · . ·--___ _
(WGAR)········S l lAR P ••••·•
(DI EDR I CH) .•... /\IHHONY .• • • ·== == == R I MA········--___ _
' DI STRICT 2
GROOT) ...•.... \·~EDAA ..•.•. ·----_. _
HOL LI NDEN ) .••. SCO TT •••... ·--___ _
DIED Rl~H) ••... CLARK .••••• ·--___ _
GARTHE .•••.•. EVA NS .•.•.. ·--___ _
WEDDLE ...••.. FOX ...•.•.• ·--____ _
DE Jt:SUS) ..... HOL T . . • . • . • . __
THOM) ..••••.•• KAY\'1000 .•.•. _____ _
PERR Y .••..•.
!HOY T) •..•••... SM ITH ••••••• ------
TIPTON) .•.•... \</I NN •••••••. ------
WARD) ..••.•.•. WOOD •.•.•.•• ------
GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG ••••••• ==:=====
DJ.STRICT 3
WARD ••••..... WOOD ..•.•.• ·----__
HOLLJNDEN) •... SVA LSTAD ••• ·------
GRAY) ...•.•••. BLACKMA N ... ·--___ _
WEDDL E) ••.•.•. COOPER •.••• ·--___ _
SY LVIA) ••••••. COX ...••••• ·--___ _
CULVER •••... _____ _
!
GART HE) •••••.• EVANS .•.•••. _____ _
PRIEST) •••••.• FRESE .•.•.•• _____ _
THO M) .••..••.. KAYWOOD ••.•. _____ _
LA CAYO) ••••.•. MAC LAIN ••.• _____ _
DA VIS) •••••••. MEYER .•••••• _____ _
OLSON ..••.••
!WI EDER) ••.•••. PATTINSON ••• ------
DIED RJCH) .••.. SCHM IT .•• ···======
YOUN G) •••••••. STEVENS •.•••
MILLER) ••.•••• WEISH AUPT ••• =:=======
DIST RICT 5
MC INNIS .••• _____ _
(DIEDR I CH) .•••• RILEY ..•••.• _____ _
(WILLIA MS) ••••• DOSTA L •••••• _____ _
DISTRI CT 6
RIMA ••••••• ·------
(DO STAL)· · • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------
(DI EDR l CH) ..... ANTHONY ·····------
DISTRI CT 7
EDGAR .•••••.• SA LTA RELLI.·--___ _
DOSTAL) ••••••• BARRETT ..•. ·--___ _
SILLS) •••.•••• BU RTON .•••• ·--___ _
DIED RI CH) ••••• CLARK ...••• ·--___ _
EVAN S ) .••••••• GA RTHE ..••• ·--___ _
GLOCKNER ••••
(HOYT) ••••••••• SM ITH·······========
DI STR ICT 11
foI EDRICH) .•••• SCHMIT .•••• ·--___ _
SHENKMAN ••• ·--___ _
WIEDER •••••• _____ _
DI STRICT 8
(DI EDRICH) •.••. RILEY .. • .•• ·--___ _
EDWARDS ..•. ·--___ _
(JO HNSON) ••.••• S\'/EENEY. • • · ·--___ _
12/8/76
J Ol li T I;OJl.l~DS
-D.l rrii:JCi.0-:-.... ANTHONY .... ___ _
DO S TAL) .•..... BARR ETT ...• ___ _
GIU\Y) ......... BLAC KMA N ... ___ _
S I LLS) ........ nUR TON .... .
DIEDFnC H) ..... CLA RK ...... ==== ~H.:DDLE) ....... COOPER .... .
SYLV I A) ....... COX ....•... ----
CULV ER ...•. ----
!\</I LLI AMS ) .•... DOS TAL .••.• ----
GA RTHEl ...••.. EVAN S ...•.. == ==
l~ED!J L E •.....• FOX ....•...
PR I EST ...•... r:RES E ...... ----
EVA NS) ....••.. GARTHE .•.•. ----
GLOCKNER .•. ----
!DE JE SUS ) ..... HOL T ..•.... ----
TH OM) ......... KAYWOOD ..•. ----
LACAYO) •...... MAC LAIN •.• ----
MC INNIS •.• ----
(D AVIS) •••••... MEYER .••.•• --------
OLSON .••••• ----
(WIEDER) ••.•... PATTINSON •. ___ _
PERRY •••.•. __ . __
(DIED RICH) .•.•. RI LEY •••.•• ___ _
.. . · R I MA ...... ___ _
(D OSTAL) •.•.•.. RYCKOFF •... ___ _
(ED GAR) .•.•.•.. SALTAR ELLI . ___ _
(DI EDRICH) ....• SCHMIT .•..• ___ _
(HOLLI f.'JDEN) ...• SCO TT .•••.. ___ _
(ED GAR) ....•..• S HARP ..•••• ___ _
SH ENKMAN ...
(H OYT) ..••.••.. SMITH ...•.• ----
(Y OUN G) ..•...•. ST EVE NS .•.. == ==
(HOLLI ND E N) .... SVALSTA D ...
(GROOT ) ..••..•. \'I ED AA .•.•.. == ==
(MILLER ) •.••••. WEISHAUP T .. ___ _
WI EDER ••••.
!TI PTON) ••.•••. WINN •••.•.• ----
WA RD) ....••... WOOD .•.••.. ----
GRAH AM) •••.•.. YOUNG ..••.. ----
OTH ERS
HARPER
SYLVEST ER
LEWIS
CLAR KE
BROh'N
WOODRUFF
HOH ENER
HOWA RD
HU NT
KE ITH
KEN NEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MA RTIN SON
P l ER SAL L
STEV ENS
TRAVERS