Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-11-24l I ColJNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF .. bRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) November 18, 1976 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 5 WEDNESDAY} NOVEMBER 24} 1976 -5:00 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY} CALIFORNIA Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of N0vember 10, 1976, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Ne. 5 will r.icet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. JWS:rb TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT NO. 5 Adjourned Regular Meeting November 24 , 1976 -5:00 p .m. No. 2 -Financial Statement of NIWA . Post Office Box 81 2 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Founta in Valley, Cal if., 92708 Teleprcnes: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 Enclosed for the Directors are copies of the Financial Statement of the Newport -Irvine Waste Management Plann ing Agency for the period March 28, 1975 through June 30, 1976. The agenda action is to receive and file the financial statements . No. 3 -General Counsel's Report re Agreement for Annexation of the Down -Coast Area to the Dist rict . Mr. Woodruff has prepared an 8th revision of the pro posed agreement for the annexation of 3 ,44 2 acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach . The Irvine Company pro - poses to annex the entire area, 3,442 acres. However, the annexa- tion fee will be paid for the planned urbanized area which is some 1500 plus acres . The planned open space area wi l l be legally de - scribed and a covenant wil l be placed on the open space areas which provides that in the event any of the open space area requires sewer services, a fee equal to the then applicable annexation fees will be due. This is more specifically described i n Paragraph 9 of the enclosed version . If this agreement is satisfac tory to the Directors, t h e other actions appearing on the agenda relative to this annexation , known as proposed Annexatlon No. 7 to District No . 5, are recommended. No. 7 -. ·status· ·or co·astal ·p e ·rmi t for Construction of the Back Bat Trunk Sewer. On November 15, the Coastal Commission was scheduled to hear the District's reques t for a permit to construct the Back Bay Gravity Trunk Sewer . However, by 3:00 p.m. Monday, the Commission failed to have a quorum; therefore we requested the hearing be held ove r to the Commission's November 22nd meeting in Torrance . Th e staff will report on the outcome of th e hearing at Wednesday 's meeting . Fred A. ·Harper General Ma n ager II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. 5 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 1976 -5:00 P.M. (1) Roll Call Post Office Box (J 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: -, _. Area Code 714 · 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statements of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period March 28, 1975, to June 30, 1976. See page "Arr (3) Report of General Counsel re proposed agreement with The Irvine Company and the Irvine Ranch Water District relative to conditions for annexa- tion of the down-coast area to the District (4) Discussion re conditions of annexation (5) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-177-5,· establishing conditions and approving agreement with The Irvine ~ompany and the Irvine Ranch Water District relative to annexation of the down-coast area to the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "B" (Copy of agreement enclosed with agenda material) (6) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-194 -5, ordering annexation of 3,442 acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Be a ch to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5) See page "C" (7) Staff report on status of California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission permit in connection with construction of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer (8) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (9) Consideration of motion to adjourn "A-1" ERNST & ERNST 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1000 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 Board of Directors Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency Newport Beach, California We have examined the balance sheet of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency Ge neral Fund as of June 30, 1976, · an<l the related statement of revenues and expenditures for the · period from March 28, 1975 (date of formation) to June 30, 1976. O~r examination was made in accordance with generally accepted · auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly the financial position of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency General Fund as of June 30, 1976 , and the results of operations for the period from March 28, 1975 to June 30, 1976, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Santa Ana, California September 14, 1976 AGEND A ITEM #2 "A-1 " . " A-2" Cash BALANCE SHEET NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-HANAGENENT PLANNING AGENCY GENERAL FUND June 30, 1976 ASSETS LIABILITIES Payable to Irvine Ranch Water District See notes to financial statements • AGENDA ITEM #2 ·. "A-2" "A-3" STATl.:.r-IBNT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES N"EWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-W\NAGEHENT PLANNING AGENCY GENERAL FUND Period from March 28, 1975 to June 30, 1976 Revenues: Contributions from members: Irvine Ranch Water District City of Newport Beach Orange County Water District County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County Expenditures -Note B: Reimbursement to the Irvine Ranch Water District for legal and professional fees See notes to financial statements. AGENDA ITEM #2 $2,000 2,000 2,000 _ .. '"-" ~)000 $8 ,ooo ~ "-"' ...._., '-" "A-3" ...., NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATE~fENTS NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PLA.t.~ING AGENCY June 30, l976 and 1975 NOTE A ORGANIZATION A.i.~D HISTORY Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency is a Joint Powers Agency which was formed on March 28, 1975. Since its formation, the Agency has been involved in planning for the collection, treatraent, disposal and reclamation of waste-water in the San Diego Creek -Newport Bay area. NOTE B -FORMATION COSTS During the period from March.28, 1975 to June 30, 1976, the Agency ~incurred approximately $30,000 in formation costs primarily for legal and professional services. These costs were paid by the Irvine Ranch Water Dis- trict (IRWD) on the Agency's behalf and are subject to reimbursement, upon approval by the Board of Directors, to IRWD out of funds received for that purpose, if any. As of June.30, 1976, the Agency's Board of Directors has authorized that IRWD be reimbursed $8,000 for these costs. ~ .._, ~ "A-4" AGENDA ITEM #2 II A-4" "B" RESOLUTION NO. 76-177-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION NO. 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS RE ANNEXATION NO. 7 - IRVINE COASTAL AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, The Irvine Company has heretofore requested annexation of approx- imately 3,442 acres of its coastal property located between·Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to the District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofor authorized initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofor declared that annexation of said territory to the District shall be subject to conditions established by the Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California; DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the agreement dated , by and between County -------------------- Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, The Irvine Company and the Irvine Ranch Water District establishing conditions re Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 24, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #5 "B" "C-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-194-5 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 7) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 7 -IRVINE COASTAL AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of county Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, C~lifornia. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 5 for annexation of said terri- tory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Re- organization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Corrunission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 5 by means of Resolution No. 76-176-5, filed with said Corrunission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Corrunission to the territory proposed to be annexed is Annexation No. 7 - I Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to county Sanitation District AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-1" "C-2" No. 5, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public s~nitary sewer service to said territory; and, · Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees and conditions of said annexation have heretoforebeen established by the Board and are set forth in that certain agreement dated by and between county Sanitation District No. 5, The Irvine Company, and the Irvine Ranch Water District; and, Section 7. That in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and the adopted Guidelines for Environmental Impact Reports adopted by the County of orange Local Agency Formation Commission and the District, it has been determined that the Local Agency Formation Commission constitutes the lead agency for this project, and has determined that a negative declaration should properly issue. The Directors have reviewed and considered the negative declaration for environmental impact issued by the county of orange Local Agency Formation Conunission, and concur with the findings therein and hereby approve said negative declaration on the basis that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, -2- AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-2" "C-3" Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Govern- ment Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and' described hereinabove, be it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 5 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held -3- AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-3" i'ifth tevision ~0/07/76 ...,, Sixth l Revi~ion 10/08/76 2 Seventh 3 Re\rision 11/08/76 4 Eighth 5 Revision 11/18/76 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 L~ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 of RE: AGENDA ITEM #5 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day ~~~~~~~~' 1976, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, herein- after referred to as "District"; THE IRVINE COMPANY, a West Virginia . corporation, hereinafter referred to as 11 Irvine"; and IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, herein- after referred to as 11 IRWD 11 • WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable provisions of law and the resolutions and policies of District, Irvine has filed an application to annex certain real properties to District for purposes of receiving sewer services for said properties; and WHEREAS, Irvine has filed application with the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission for approval of the annexation to District; and WHEREAS, Irvine proposes to annex 3,442 acres of land (hereinafter referred.to as the "Territory"), owned by Irvine, to District; and WHEREAS, the Territory is also within the boundaries of IRWD for the purpose of obtaining from IRWD water and sewer service, and such service is conditional per that certain con- tract between IRWD and the city of Newport Beach, dated September 11, 1972, as amended September 10, 1973; and WHEREAS, the plan proposed by Irvine for the Territory, attached as Exhibit "C", provides for development for urban land use of approximately 1,535 acres (hereinafter referred to as the "Urban Area"), with the remaining 1,907 acres to be kept in conservation and open space uses (hereinafter referred to as the "Open Space Area"); and l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 . ..,,,, 26 27 28 29 30 31 52 WHEREAS, Irvine has proposed to immediately pay all current annexation charges for the Urban Area and has requested an indefinite deferral of payment of the annexation charges for the Open Space Area, and has proposed that the payment of such deferred annexation charges shall be made as set forth in Paragraph 9 hereof; and WHEREAS, District has determined that annexation of the Territory to District can only be in the best interests of the other property owners and taxpayers of the District if the organization and directorship of the District remains intact as presently constituted; and WHEREAS, District, Irvine and IRWD have each undertaken studies to determine the feasibility and desirability of annexing said Territory to District; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by District, Irvine and IRWD that it is necessary to execute an agreement pertaining to the respective rights, duties and obligations, both presently and prospectively, of each of the parties hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Irvine and IRWD shall comply with all provisions of Resolution No. 75-15-5 of District pertaining to the annexa- tion policy of the District. 2. District agrees that as to the 3,442 acres of area requested to be annexed by Irvine, and which is more particu- larly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, District will pursue annexation proceedings, seek approval by the orange county Local Agency Formation Commission and there- after diligently pursue all other proceedings and procedures to completion. -2- l 3. IRWD may provide local sewers and facilities within 2 the Territory in order to provide service to the developed areas 3 and may connect said facilities to District's master plan 4 sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules and regula- 5 tions of District in effect on the date of connection. 6 4. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that District was created 7 and exists pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act 8 (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et~-). 9 5. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that IRWD is not a sani- 10 tary district as that term is defined and intended by the County 11 sanitation District Act; and therefore is not entitled to 12 select and appoint a member to the governing board of District 13 as prescribed by Section 4730 of said Act. 14 6. Within ninety (90) days of the date of District's 15 action ordering said annexation, Irvine shall pay to District 16 annexation fees in the sum of Two Million One Hundred Thirty- 17 Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety and 00/100 ($2,139,790.00) 18 Dollars. These fees are payable on the basis of the current 19 rate of One Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Four and 00/100 20 ($1,394.00) Dollars per acre for the Urban Area proposed to 21 be developed within the annexation territory. The parties 22 acknowledge that the exact boundary description and acreage 23 of the Urban Area are not yet certified and are subject to 24 future charge. Upon certification of the final acreage, the 25 total fees shall be calculated and payment of the difference 26 from the amount set forth above shall be made to the District 27 or Irvine within thirty (30) days thereafter. 28 7. The annexation fees due to District pursuant to 29 Paragraph 6 hereof, may be paid in any manner determined by 30 Irvine: provided, however, that neither Irvine nor IRWD shall 31 cause any bonded indebtedness to be assessed and levied upon 32 the property within the Territory for payment of such annexation -3- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 fees. The parties hereto further acknowledge that the annexa- tion fees to be paid by Irvine are to acquire an interest in existing District facilities, including the treatment works. 8. Payment of annexation fees that are due for the Open Space Area, shall remain deferred until the occurrence of such events as set forth in Paragraph 9 hereof. The payment of such deferred annexation fees pursuant to this Paragraph shall be secured by a covenant running with the land which Irvine agrees to impose upon the Open Space Area by recording concurrently with the completion of the pending annexation proceedings for the 3,442 acres, a Declaration of Covenant Running With the Land, substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit 11 D 11 , which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 9. No sewer service connecting to District facilities, either directly or through a local sewer collection system, shall be permitted in the Open Space Area, until an applica- tion for approval is submitted by the owner to the District, or its designated agent. The annexation fees which are deferred pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall be paid by the then owner of la·nd within thirty (30) days after receipt of approval by District for sewer service or prior to the connection to District's facilities, whichever is sooner. The determination of the amount of annexation fees to be paid by such owner, shall be on the basis of the then current annexa- tion fee per acre, established and in force by the District for annexations, multiplied by the number of acres submitted in the application for sewer service; provided, however, that if the number of acres for which application for sewer service is requested is less than the number of acres beneficially served by said connection, the Board of Directors of District shall have the absolute power to determine a minimum acreage for which the fees shall be paid in order to receive sewer service. -4- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ~ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 such determination shall be based upon a consideration of relevant land use planning and engineering data, including the contemplated land use within the Open Space Area which will be beneficially served by the connection, the projected amount of average dry weather sewer flow from said area, the design flow of the sewer line to be installed (specified in total gallons per day), all of which shall be compared with a similar projection on the basis that said service area were to be developed with single family residential improve- ments. These calculations shall be considered as a guideline of the Board of Directors, but shall not be binding thereon. 10. In the event Irvine seeks to annex any portion of the Territory included within this Agreement to any incor- porated city other than the city of Newport Beach, it will concurrently therewith support District's petition to the orange County Local Agency Formation Commission or its suc- cessors for approval of deannexation and/or detachment from District of the same territory. that is requested to be annexed to the city, provided that all required actions have been taken by all necessary parties to permit the provisions for service under Paragraph 11. In furtherance thereof, Irvine and IRWD agree to execute any and all necessary docu- ments to accomplish said deannexation/detachment of such area from District. 11. Coincident with the occurrence of events as set forth in Paragraph 10 above, and the completion of deannexation/ detachment proceedings from District, District shall immedia- tely commence and continue to provide sewer service to the same extent as received or capable of being provided by District while said territory was included within District. The specific terms and conditions of providing such service shall be set forth in a written agreement on the basis of -5- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ~ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 sound engineering practices and at the same per unit service cost as the overall District, plus a service charge of ten (10%) percent, in accordance with the existing policy of the Joint Boards relating to providing of service outside of the District. 12. In the event Irvine annexs or attempts to annex some portion of the Territory hereunder to a city other than the City of Newport Beach, and fails to support deannexation/ detachment proceedings from District concurrently therewith in accordance with the terms of Paragraphs 10 and 11 above, or files objections or protests thereto, District shall be entitled to initiate proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California to obtain necessary judicial orders to immediately insure performance of this Agreement. Irvine appears to pay all reasonable attorneys• fees and court costs related to said proceedings. 13. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered shall be deposited in any United States Post Office, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties hereto as follows: TO DISTRICT TO IRVINE TO IRWD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ellis Avenue, P.O. Box 8127 Fountain valley, ca. 92708 THE IRVINE COMPANY 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box D-1 Irvine, Ca. 92716 and shall be deemed to have been received by the party ad- dressed at the expiration of 72 hours after deposit of same in the Post Office. 14. If any portion of this Agreement is judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, it is the intent -6- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ........ ill and declaration of the parties hereto that all other provisions 211 shall remain in full force and effect. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By 3 4 5 6 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: By 8 II Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 II II ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- THE IRVINE COMPANY By By IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT By By -7- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts . Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: \. re ... "".) cb DISTRICT No. 5 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 1976 -5:00 P.M. Roll Call Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA Consideration of motion to receive and file Audited Financial Statements of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency for the period March 28, 1975, to June 30, 1976. See page "A" Report of General Counsel re proposed agreement with The Irvine Company and the Irvine Ranch Water District relative to conditions for annexa- tion of the down-coast area to the District Discussion re conditions of annexation Consideration of Resolution No. 76-177-5, establishing conditions and approving agreement with The Irvine Company and the Irvine Ranch Water District relative to annexation of the down-coast area to the District, in form approved by the General Counsel. See page "B" (Copy of agreement enclosed with agenda material) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-194-5, ordering annexation of 3,442 acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5) See page "C" (7) Staff report on status of California Coastal Zone Con servation Commission permit in connection with construction of .the Back Bay Trunk Sewer (8) Other bus iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (9) Consideration of motion to adjourn ·'- "A-1" ERNST & ERNST 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, S UITE 1000 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 Board of Directors Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency Newport Beach, California - We have examined the balance sheet of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency General Fund as of June 30, 1976, and the related statement of r e venues and expenditures for the period from March 28, 1975 (date_ of fonnation) to June 30, 1976. O~r examination was made in accordance with generally accepted · auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we cons id e r e d nece ssary in the circumstances . In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above pre sent fairly the financial position of the Newport-Irvine Wa s te-Ma nagement Planning Agency General Fund as of June 30, 1976, and the results of operations for the period from March 28, 1975 to June 30, 1976, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Santa Ana, California Sep tember 14, 1976 AGENDA ITEM #2 "A-1" . " A-2" Cash BALANCE SHEET NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGE'l-1ENT PL.A.NNING AGENCY GENERAL FUND June 30, 1976 ASSETS LIABILITIES Payable to Irvine Ranch Water District See notes to financial statements • AGENDA ITEM #2 "A-2" "A-3" STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES t-rEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PLANNING AGENCY GENERAL FUND Period from March 28, 1975 to June 30, 1976 Revenues: Contributions from members: Irvine Ranch Water District City of Newport Beach Orange County Water District County Sanitation District No. Orange County Expenditures -Note B: Reimbursement to the Irvine Ranch 5 of Water District for legal and professional fees •• .$' See notes to financial statements. AGENDA ITEM #2 ·'-" ... $2,000 2,000 2,000 _1.,000 $8,000 '-"' ~ "A-3" ~ ~ ~ NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PL!u~ING AGENCY June 30, ·1976 and 1975 NOTE A -ORGANIZATION .Al.~D HISTORY Ne-wport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency is a Joint Powers Agency which was formed on March 28, 1975. Since its formation, the Agency has been involved in planning for the collection, treatment, disposal and reclamation of waste-water in the San Diego Creek -Newport Bay area. NOTE B -FOR.J.'1ATION COSTS During the period from March.28, 1975 to June 30, 1976, the Agency incurred approximately $30,000 in formation costs primarily for legal and professional services. These costs were paid by the Irvine Ranch Water Dis- trict (IRWD) on the Agency's behalf and are subject to reimbursement, upon approval by the Board of Directors, to IRWD out of funds received for that purpose, if any. As of Jtine.30, 1976, the Agency's Board of Directors has authorized that IRWD be reimbursed $8,000 for these costs. "A-4" AGENDA ITEM #2 "A-4" "B" RESOLUTION NO. 76-177-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION NO. 7 A RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS RE ANNEXATION NO. 7 - IRVINE COASTAL AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, The Irvine Company has heretofore requested annexation of approx- imately 3,442 acres of its coastal property located between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to the District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofor authorized initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofor declared that annexation of said territory to the District shall be subject to conditions established by the Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California; DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the agreement dated , by and between County ------------------------ Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, The Irvine Company and the Irvine Ranch Water District establishing conditions re Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to CounLy Sanitation District No. 5, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel, on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 24, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #5 "B" "C-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-194-5 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 7) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 7 -IRVINE COASTAL AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, C~lifornia. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 5 for annexation of said terri- tory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That, pursuant to Division 1 (District Re- organization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of. said territory to County Sanitation District No. 5 by means of Resolution No. 76-176-5, filed with said Commission by the District; and, section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is Annexation No. 7 - I Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to county Sanitation District AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-1" "C-2" No. 5, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit 11 A 11 and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; ·and, section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, · Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation fees and conditions of said annexation have heretoforebeen established by the Board and are set forth in that certain agreement dated ~~~~~~~~~~~~- by and between county Sanitation District No. 5, The Irvine Company, and the Irvine Ranch Water District; and, Section 7. That in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and the adopted Guidelines for Environmental Impact Reports adopted by the County of Orange Local Agency Formation Commission and the District, it has been determined that the Local Agency Formation Commission constitutes the lead agency for this project, and has determined that a negative declaration should properly issue. The Directors have reviewed and considered the negative declaration for environmental impact issued by the County of orange Local Agency Formation Commission, and concur with the findings therein and hereby approve said negative declaration on the basis that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, -2- AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-2" Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Govern- ment Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred ·. to and described hereinabove, be it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 5 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held -3- "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #6 "C-3" November 24, 1976 BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION -for Coastal Commission Hearing November 29, 1976 in Torrance ENERGY CONSUPMTION Old Pump New Pump Station Station Kilowatt hours of Electricity 500,000 *650,000 Cost at 3¢ per Kilowatt hour $15,000 $20,000 Cubic Feet of Natural Gas 4 Million 5.3 Million Barrels of Oil 1600 2150 *The old pump station is now pumping about 85% of the expected average daily flows. The new pump station calculations are figurea at 100% of the average daily flow. CAPACITY Gravity Line 0 0 0 0 The construction of the gravity line will leave an excess capacity in the Jamboree Trunk that will never be utilized. The service area for the Trunk is 150 acres and would only require an 10" line instead of the Jamboree Trunk. The flows are estimated to ultimately be 1.2 MGD for this area. If necessary a portion of the line could be down-sized from 18" to 10" to satisfy the capacity issue. --~_Part II-Tues., Nov. 23, 1976 R '('.. . * JLcs ~~gclts ~imrs CoastlBne Panelists Question Sewer Project They Raise Objections to Line Near Upper Bay but Delay Decision BY DALE FETHEHLING Times Staff Writer The South Coast Regional Coastline Commission, seem- ingly about to deny a permit for a controversial sewer near Upper Newport Bay, Monday delayed the decision a w_cek to get more data on energy use. · . the commission, meeting in Torrance, heard a strong recommendation from its staff against approval of the $500,000 project proposf'd by the Orange County Sanitation Districts. . In sharp questioning, several commissioners also took issue with the proposal designed to divert sewage around an inadequate pump station on lower Jamboree Road. . . OCSD General Manager Fred Harper expressed concern over the reliability of the pump station system, which has safer," he said, "then to go in there and start digging holes around the bay." But Robert Montgomery. regional manager of Fish and Game, said he feared possible pollution from a pump station failure more than possible damaging effects from the pipel_ine construction. . Other proponents said the short-teJ:m risks in building the line were more than offset by the long-term savings in energy that such a gravity line would provide. But upon questioning. OCSD could not produce figures on the amount of energy used by the present station _or would be used by an expanded one. "If we have to make a decision based on energy use, it's unfortunate we don't have all the information,'1 Chairwoman Judy Rosener said. already experienced overflows. · · TP.ough they appeared at one point on the verge of voting· oCSD instead seeks to run a 24-inch gravity line down Big the project down, the commissioners, on a motion by Canyon to Back Bay Drive and then aJong that road to. Laurence Schmit, a county supervisor, decided to postpone a · Pacific Coast Highway. decision until next Monday's meeting at Torrance City Hall. 'l'he State Department of Fish and Game, which plans an If the ~reject i~ approv~d. OCSD h.as agreed to defer any interpretative center near the mouth of Rig Canyon and·, con.struct1on until the migratory bird season ends next could use the same utility right-of-way, favors the p1:ojcct' sprmg. So docs the city of Newport Beach and the Friends of In another action, the commission Monday on a tic vote Newport Bay, a conservationist group. denied a request to build a three-level home at 3611 Ocean No one in the audience spoke in oppo3ition. Blvd., adjacent to Inspiration Point in Corona del ~Iar. But the staff and some of the com1r.l:~~:ioners contended The applicant, Don Renner, said city, county and state that ·the project would be grO\'rth-inducing and would risk plans to buy the property for a view park have not matcrial- damage to the b:iy during construction. ized in more th:m three years. But a number of Commi::sion- . Commissioners David Common2 doggedly suggested cr.s said the site still may be publicly purcha~ed and that replacing and enlarging th0 pump station and paralleling building on the steep site could block views of the shoreline · present lines along Jamboree. "That certainly would be and tide pools below. Fifth Revision 10/07/76 ,_..,.. .. Sixth J. Revision 10/08/76 2 Seventh 3 Revision 11/08/76 4 Eighth 5 Revision 11/18/76 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 of RE: AGENDA ITEM #5 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day ~~~~~~~~-' 1976, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, herein- after referred to as "District"; THE IRVINE COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Irvine"; and IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, herein- after referred to as "IRWD". WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable provisions of law and the resolutions and policies of District, Irvine has filed an application to annex certain real properties to District for purposes of receiving sewer services for said properties; and WHEREAS, Irvine has filed application with the orange County Local Agency Formation Commission for approval of the annexation to District; and WHEREAS, Irvine proposes to annex 3,442 acres of land (hereinafter referred to as the "Territory"), owned by Irvine, to District; and WHEREAS, the Territory is also within the boundaries of IRWD for the purpose of obtaining from IRWD water and sewer service, and such service is conditional per that certain con- tract between IRWD and the City of Newport Beach, dated September 11, 1972, as amended September 10, 1973; and WHEREAS, the plan proposed by Irvine for the Territory, attached as Exhibit "C", provides for development for urban land use of approximately 1,535 acres (hereinafter referred to as the "Urban Area"), with the remaining 1,907 acres to be kept in conservation and open space uses (hereinafter referred to as the "Open Space Area"); and 1 WHEREAS, Irvine has proposed to immediately pay all 2 current annexation charges for the Urban Area and has requested 3 an indefinite deferral of payment of the annexation charges 4 for the Open Space Area, and has proposed that the payment of 5 such deferred annexation charges shall be made as set forth 6 in Paragraph 9 hereof; and 7 WHEREAS, District has determined that annexation of the 8 Territory to District can only be in the best interests of the 9 other property owners and taxpayers of the District if the 10 organization and directorship of the District remains intact 11 12 13 as presently constituted; and WHEREAS, District, Irvine and IRWD have each undertaken studies to determine the feasibility and desirability of 14 annexing said Territory to District; and 15 WHEREAS, it has been determined by District, Irvine and 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 IRWD that it is necessary to execute an agreement pertaining to the respective rights, duties and obligations, both presently and prospectively, of each of the parties hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Irvine and IRWD shall comply with all provisions of Resolution No. 75-15-5 of District pertaining to the annexa- tion policy of the District. 2. District agrees that as to the 3,442 acres of area requested to be annexed by Irvine, and which is more particu- larly described and delineated on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, District will pursue annexation proceedings, seek approval by the orange county Local Agency Formation Commission and there- after diligently pursue all other proceedings and procedures to completion. -2- l 3. IRWD may provide local sewers and facilities within 2 the Territory in order to provide service to the developed areas 3 and may connect said facilities to District's master plan 4 sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules and regula- 5 tions of District in effect on the date of connection. 6 4. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that District was created 7 and exists pursuant to the county Sanitation District Act 8 (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et~-). 9 5. IRWD and Irvine acknowledge that IRWD is not a sani- 10 tary district as that term is defined and intended by the County 11 Sanitation District Act; and therefore is not entitled to 12 select and appoint a member to the governing board of District 13 as prescribed by Section 4730 of said Act. 14 6. Within ninety (90) days of the date of District's 15 action ordering said annexation, Irvine shall pay to District 16 annexation fees in the sum of Two Million One Hundred Thirty- 17 Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety and 00/100 ($2,139,790.00) 18 Dollars. These fees are payable on the basis of the current 19 rate of One Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Four and 00/100 20 ($1, 394. 00) Dollars per acre for the Urban Area prop.osed to 21 be developed within the annexation territory. The parties 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 acknowledge that the exact boundary description and acreage of the Urban Area are not yet certified and are subject to future charge. Upon certification of the final acreage, the total fees shall be calculated and payment of the difference from the amount set forth above shall be made to the District or Irvine within thirty (30) days thereafter. 7. The annexation fees due to District pursuant to Paragraph 6 hereof, may be paid in any manner determined by Irvine; provided, however, that neither Irvine nor IRWD shall cause any bonded indebtedness to be assessed and levied upon the property within the Territory for payment of such annexation -3- ~ l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 fees. The parties hereto further acknowledge that the annexa- tion fees to be paid by Irvine are to acquire an interest in existing District facilities, including the treatment works. 8. Payment of annexation fees that are due for the Open Space Area, shall remain deferred until the occurrence of such events as set forth in Paragraph 9 hereof. The payment of such deferred annexation fees pursuant to this Paragraph shall be secured by a covenant running with the land which Irvine agrees to impose upon the Open Space Area by recording concurrently with the completion of the pending annexation proceedings for the 3,442 acres, a Declaration of Covenant Running With the Land, substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit 11 D 11 , which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 9. No sewer service connecting to District facilities, either directly or through a local sewer collection system, shall be permitted in the Open Space Area, until an applica- tion for approval is submitted by the owner to the District, or its designated agent. The annexation fees which are deferred pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall be paid by the then owner of land within thirty (30) days after receipt of approval by District for sewer service or prior to the connection to District's facilities, whichever is sooner. The determination of the amount of annexation fees to be paid by such owner, shall be on the basis of the then current annexa- tion fee per acre, established and in force by the District for annexations, multiplied by the number of acres submitted in the application for sewer service; provided, however, that if the number of acres for which application for sewer service is requested is less than the number of acres beneficially served by said connection, the Board of Directors of District shall have the absolute power to determine a minimum acreage for which the fees shall be paid in order to receive sewer service. -4- l Such determination shall be based upon a consideration of 2 relevant land use planning and engineering data, including 3 the contemplated land use within the Open Space Area which 4 will be beneficially served by the connection, the projected 5 amount of average dry weather sewer flow from said area, the 6 design flow of the sewer line to be installed (specified in 7 total gallons per day), all of which shall be compared 8 with a similar projection on the basis that said service area 9 were to be developed with single family residential improve- 10 ments. These calculations shall be considered as a guideline 11 of the Board of Directors, but shall not be binding thereon. 12 10. In the event Irvine seeks to annex any portion of 13 the Territory included within this Agreement to any incor- 14 porated city other than the City of Newport Beach, it will 15 concurrently therewith support District's petition to the 16 Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission or its suc- 17 cessors for approval of deannexation and/or detachment from 18 District of· the same territory. that is requested to be 19 annexed to the City, provided that all required actions have 20 been taken by all necessary parties to permit the provisions 21 for service under Paragraph 11. In furtherance thereof, 22 Irvine and IRWD agree to execute any and all necessary docu- 23 ments to accomplish said deannexation/detachrnent of such area 24 from District. 25 11. Coincident with the occurrence of events as set forth 26 in Paragraph 10 above, and the completion of deannexation/ 27 detachment proceedings from District, District shall irnrnedia- 28 tely commence and continue to provide sewer service to the 29 same extent as received or capable of being provided by 30 District while said territory was included within District. 31 The specific terms and conditions of providing such service 32 shall be set forth in a written agreement on the basis of -5- ....,,. . J. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "-""' 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 sound engineering practices and at the same per unit service cost as the overall District, plus a service charge of ten (10%) percent, in accordance with the existing policy of the Joint Boards relating to providing of service outside of the District. 12. In the event Irvine annexs or attempts to annex some portion of the Territory hereunder to a city other than the city of Newport Beach, and fails to support deannexation/ detachment proceedings from District concurrently therewith in accordance with the terms of Paragraphs 10 and 11 above, or files objections or protests thereto, District shall be entitled to initiate proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California to obtain necessary judicial orders to immediately insure performance of this Agreement. Irvine appears to pay all reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs related to said proceedings. 13. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered shall be deposited in any United States Post Office, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties hereto as follows: TO DISTRICT TO IRVINE TO IRWD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ellis Avenue, P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 THE IRVINE COMPANY 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box D-1 Irvine, Ca. 92716 and shall be deemed to have been · received by the party ad- dressed at the expiration f o 72 hours after deposit of same in the Post Office. 14. If any portion of this Agreement is judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, it is the intent -6- ,; ~ - 111 and declaration of the parties hereto that all other provisions 211 shall remain in full force and effect. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By~~~~~~~~ 3 4 5 6 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: By~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 8 II Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .24 25 26 27 .28 29 30 31 II II 32 II THE IRVINE COMPANY By __ _ By· _____ _ IRVINE RANCH WA TER DI STRICT By __ By~~~~~~~~- -7- Cqastline Panelists Question Sewer Project .... ' ..... They Raise Obje~tions to Line .N.ear Upper Bay but Delay Decision .BY. DALE FETHERLING safer," he said, "then to go in there and start digging holes Time~ Slaff Writer _ . , around the bay." . , The South Coast Regional' Coastline Commission, seem-But Robert Montgomery, regional manager of Fish and 'ingly about to ·deny a permit for a controversial SElwer nea,r Game, said he feared possible pollution from a pump station Upper ·Newport Bay, Monday delayed the decision a w:eek to failure more than possible damaging effects from the get more data on energy use. · . . ; pip~line construction. T.he commission, meeting in Torrance, heard a strong other proponents said the short-tettn riskS in building the recommendation from its staff against approval of the line were ·moi:e than offset by the long-term savings in $500,000 project proposed by t.lfe Orai;ige County Sanitation energy that sµch a gravity line ~ould provide. Distncts. · . . . . : But upon questioning,'OCSD could not prOduce figures on . In sh~tp quest1emng, s~vera l ~oww~ss1oners also took the amount of energy used by the present station ,?r would ~ssu~ with the propos~l ctes1gned to 9rv~rt sewage around an . be used by an expanded one. "If w~ have to make a decision inadequate pump station on lower Jam"?dree Road. ·" ·· 'based on energy use , it's unfortunate we don't have all the OCSD General Manager Fred Harper expressed corij!ern ihlOrmation " Chairwoman Judy Rosener said. over the reliability of the pump station system, which has ' · already experienced overflows. · · TlJ.ough they .appeared at one point on the verge of voting· oCsD instead seeks to run a 24-inch gravity ·line down Big the project do_wn, the commis~ioners •. on a motion by Canyon to Back Bay Drive and then along that road to . La~~~nceS~hmit,acounty 1supen:1sor,dec1dedto~tponea · Pacific Coast Highway. · · · dec1s1on unt~ next Mondays meeting at Torrance City Hall. The State Department of Fish and Game, which plans an • If the ~roJect 1~ ?-pprov~d, OCSD h.as agreed to defern an~ interpretative center near the mouth of Big Can yon and 1 con.struct1on until the migratory bird season ends ex .. could· use tbe same utility right-of-way, favors the p~oject r spring .. So does the. city of Newport Beac h and the Friends of In ano ther action, the commission Monday on a tie vote NewportBay,.a conservationist gro up. / denied a request to build a three-level home at 3611 Ocean .No one in the,audience spoke in opposition. I Blvd., adjacent to Inspi!ation Point in Corona del Mar. But'tl).e staff and som~ of the commissioners contend~d The applicant, Don Renner, said city, county and state tliat 'the pro.ject would be growth~'i.nducjng .and would risk plans to buy 'the prop erty for a view park have not material- damage to the bay during construct ion." · . ized in mo re than three years. But a number of Commission-. · Commi8sioners Dav id Commons doggedly suggested e r s said the site still may be publicly purchased and that re~l~cing .and enlarging the pump station and paral!~ling buiJdiI)g on the steep site could block views of the shoreline ' present ·lines along Jamboree. "That certainly would be and tide pool s below. •. .. fiEETIN G DATE _N ovember 24, 1 976 Tii"[ 5:00 p.m . D I STH I CTS 5 ----I nis:r1nc T i (ty°AN~ · · · · Gf\RTHE · • • · . ·--___ _ (WGAR)········S l lAR P ••••·• (DI EDR I CH) .•... /\IHHONY .• • • ·== == == R I MA········--___ _ ' DI STRICT 2 GROOT) ...•.... \·~EDAA ..•.•. ·----_. _ HOL LI NDEN ) .••. SCO TT •••... ·--___ _ DIED Rl~H) ••... CLARK .••••• ·--___ _ GARTHE .•••.•. EVA NS .•.•.. ·--___ _ WEDDLE ...••.. FOX ...•.•.• ·--____ _ DE Jt:SUS) ..... HOL T . . • . • . • . __ THOM) ..••••.•• KAY\'1000 .•.•. _____ _ PERR Y .••..•. !HOY T) •..•••... SM ITH ••••••• ------ TIPTON) .•.•... \</I NN •••••••. ------ WARD) ..••.•.•. WOOD •.•.•.•• ------ GRAHAM) ••••••• YOUNG ••••••• ==:===== DJ.STRICT 3 WARD ••••..... WOOD ..•.•.• ·----__ HOLLJNDEN) •... SVA LSTAD ••• ·------ GRAY) ...•.•••. BLACKMA N ... ·--___ _ WEDDL E) ••.•.•. COOPER •.••• ·--___ _ SY LVIA) ••••••. COX ...••••• ·--___ _ CULVER •••... _____ _ ! GART HE) •••••.• EVANS .•.•••. _____ _ PRIEST) •••••.• FRESE .•.•.•• _____ _ THO M) .••..••.. KAYWOOD ••.•. _____ _ LA CAYO) ••••.•. MAC LAIN ••.• _____ _ DA VIS) •••••••. MEYER .•••••• _____ _ OLSON ..••.•• !WI EDER) ••.•••. PATTINSON ••• ------ DIED RJCH) .••.. SCHM IT .•• ···====== YOUN G) •••••••. STEVENS •.••• MILLER) ••.•••• WEISH AUPT ••• =:======= DIST RICT 5 MC INNIS .••• _____ _ (DIEDR I CH) .•••• RILEY ..•••.• _____ _ (WILLIA MS) ••••• DOSTA L •••••• _____ _ DISTRI CT 6 RIMA ••••••• ·------ (DO STAL)· · • • • • • RYCKOFF • • • • ·------ (DI EDR l CH) ..... ANTHONY ·····------ DISTRI CT 7 EDGAR .•••••.• SA LTA RELLI.·--___ _ DOSTAL) ••••••• BARRETT ..•. ·--___ _ SILLS) •••.•••• BU RTON .•••• ·--___ _ DIED RI CH) ••••• CLARK ...••• ·--___ _ EVAN S ) .••••••• GA RTHE ..••• ·--___ _ GLOCKNER •••• (HOYT) ••••••••• SM ITH·······======== DI STR ICT 11 foI EDRICH) .•••• SCHMIT .•••• ·--___ _ SHENKMAN ••• ·--___ _ WIEDER •••••• _____ _ DI STRICT 8 (DI EDRICH) •.••. RILEY .. • .•• ·--___ _ EDWARDS ..•. ·--___ _ (JO HNSON) ••.••• S\'/EENEY. • • · ·--___ _ 12/8/76 J Ol li T I;OJl.l~DS -D.l rrii:JCi.0-:-.... ANTHONY .... ___ _ DO S TAL) .•..... BARR ETT ...• ___ _ GIU\Y) ......... BLAC KMA N ... ___ _ S I LLS) ........ nUR TON .... . DIEDFnC H) ..... CLA RK ...... ==== ~H.:DDLE) ....... COOPER .... . SYLV I A) ....... COX ....•... ---- CULV ER ...•. ---- !\</I LLI AMS ) .•... DOS TAL .••.• ---- GA RTHEl ...••.. EVAN S ...•.. == == l~ED!J L E •.....• FOX ....•... PR I EST ...•... r:RES E ...... ---- EVA NS) ....••.. GARTHE .•.•. ---- GLOCKNER .•. ---- !DE JE SUS ) ..... HOL T ..•.... ---- TH OM) ......... KAYWOOD ..•. ---- LACAYO) •...... MAC LAIN •.• ---- MC INNIS •.• ---- (D AVIS) •••••... MEYER .••.•• -------- OLSON .••••• ---- (WIEDER) ••.•... PATTINSON •. ___ _ PERRY •••.•. __ . __ (DIED RICH) .•.•. RI LEY •••.•• ___ _ .. . · R I MA ...... ___ _ (D OSTAL) •.•.•.. RYCKOFF •... ___ _ (ED GAR) .•.•.•.. SALTAR ELLI . ___ _ (DI EDRICH) ....• SCHMIT .•..• ___ _ (HOLLI f.'JDEN) ...• SCO TT .•••.. ___ _ (ED GAR) ....•..• S HARP ..•••• ___ _ SH ENKMAN ... (H OYT) ..••.••.. SMITH ...•.• ---- (Y OUN G) ..•...•. ST EVE NS .•.. == == (HOLLI ND E N) .... SVALSTA D ... (GROOT ) ..••..•. \'I ED AA .•.•.. == == (MILLER ) •.••••. WEISHAUP T .. ___ _ WI EDER ••••. !TI PTON) ••.•••. WINN •••.•.• ---- WA RD) ....••... WOOD .•.••.. ---- GRAH AM) •••.•.. YOUNG ..••.. ---- OTH ERS HARPER SYLVEST ER LEWIS CLAR KE BROh'N WOODRUFF HOH ENER HOWA RD HU NT KE ITH KEN NEY LYNCH MADDOX MA RTIN SON P l ER SAL L STEV ENS TRAVERS