Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-09-08ll .. BOARDS OF DJRECTO rt S County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. 11 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 -6:00 P.M. (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Post Office Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Te lephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (3) Discussion re Draft Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation Distri~t No. 11 (copies of proposed District Master Plan and proposed City Master Plan enclosed) (4) Other business and communications (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn 7 ''"YD MEETING DATE September 8, 1976 TIME 6:00 p.m. DJ STR ICTS 11 ~----~-~ D'I STRICT 1 (EVANS) ......••• GARTHE ...•.• _____ _ (EDGAR) .••.•...• SHAR P .•.••• _____ _ DIEDRICH .•. _______ _ RIMA ........ ----· --- DISTRICT 2 (GROOT) ......••. WEDAA •••.•.• ~HOLLINDENL ... SCOTT •...••• == == == . DIEDRICH) .....• CLARK ..••.•. GART HE ) ........ EVANS ...••.• ------ ~WEDDLE) .......• FOX .......... ------ DE J~susL ..•. HOLT .•..•.... == == == THOM) .•........ KAY WOOD ..... PERRY ..•.... ------ (HOYT) ........•• SM ITH •...•.. ------ ~TIPTON) ....••.• WINN •....... == == == WARD) •.•.•..... WOOD . . • . • • . . · GRAHAM) .....••. YOUNG .....•. == == == · DISTRICT 3 (WARD) ..•.. ." .... WOOD .••....• _____ ·_ (HOLLI NDEN) .. · · SVA LSTAD· · · · _____ _ (GRAY)······· .•• BLACKMAN···· _____ _ (WEDDLE)········ COOP ER······ ----__ (SYLVIA).······· CO X·········· ------CUL VER· .. · .• _____ _ GAR THE) · · · · · · · · EVANS · • · · · • · _____ _ PRIEST).······· FRES E······· _____ _ THOM)·········· KAYWOO D····· _____ _ LACAYO)········ MAC LAI N···· _____ _ DAVI s) · · · · · · · · · MEYER······· __ ---- OLSON······· __ --_· _ !WIEDER).····· .. PAT T IN SON··· _____ _ DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT······ _____ _ YOUNG)········· STE VENS····· _____ _ MILLER)········ WEI S HAUPT··· _____ _ DI STRICT 5 MC INNI S .... _____ _ (DIED RIC H) ....•. RI LE Y ....... __ __ (WILLIA MS) .....• ROGERS ...... _____ _ DI STRICT 6 · RIMA........ _ (ROGERS) ...•..... RYCKOFF ..... == == __ DIEDRICH··· _____ _ DI STRICT 7 ! EDGA R) ........• SALTARELLI. _____ _ ROGERS) ... ····· BARRET T ····· _____ _ SILLS) ......•... BURTON ...... _____ _ DIEDRICH).····· CLARK······· _____ _ EVAN S) .. ····•·· GAR T HE • · · · · • _____ _ GLOCKNER···· (HOYT)·········· SM ITH······· == == == DI STRICT 11 (DI EDRICH).. ...• SCHMIT ...... ~ ___ _ SHENKMAN .••• ~ ___ _ WIEDER ..•••. ~ ___ _ DI STRICT 8 (DI EDR I CH) ...•.. RI LEY ...•... EDW AR DS .... . (JOHN SON) ......• SWE ENEY .... . 7/14/7 6 JO INT BOARDS (R O GERS~.· ..... · BARRETT······ ____ . DIEDRICH · .. ___ _ GRAY)) •..••••••• BLACKMAN .... ___ _ SILLS ... ~ ...... BUR TON .. ; ... _. __ _ DJEDRICHJ ...... CL ARK ....... ___ _ WEDDLE~ ....••... COO PER. ...... ___ _ SYLVIA .•..•.... COX .......... ___ _ CULVER ....... ___ _ !GARTHE) ....••••• EVAN S .•...... WEDDLE) ...... · ... FOX .......... ___ _ PRIE ST) ......... FR ESE ........ ___ _ EVAN S) •...•..... GARTHE. ...... ___ _ GLOCKNER ... . !DE Jt:su s ). ....• HOLT ......... ==== TH OM) ........... KAYWOOD..... __ LACAYO).. ....... MAC LAIN .... == __ . MC I NN I S .... ___ _ (DAVI S) •........• MEYER ........ ___ _ OLSON ....... . (WIEDER) ....•... PATTINSON •.. ==== PERRY ....... . (DIEDRICH). ..... RILEY ........ ==== RIMA ........ . WILLIAMS) ...... ROG ERS ....... ==== ROGERS) •....... RYCKOFF ..... . EDGAR) •......... SA LT ARE LLI.. == == DIEDRICH) ....•. SC HMIT ....•.. ___ _ HOLLI NDEN) ..... SCO TT ....... . EDGAR) .......... SHARP .....••. ___ _ S HEN KMAN ...• ~HOYT) ..........• SMIT H ........ ---- YOU NG) .........• STEVENS. ••... ---- HOLLINDEN) ..... SVA LSTAD ••.. == == (GROOT) .......••. WEDAA ...•.... ___ _ (MILLER) ......•. WEISHAUPT •.. ___ _ WI EDER •..••. !TIPTON) ••.••... WINN ......... ---- WARD L ......... wooD· ......... == == GRAHAM) •••..... YOUNG .....•.. ___ _ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLAR KE TA YLO R BROWN WOOD RUFF HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH ·KENNEY LYNCH MADD OX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVE NS TRAVERS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 2, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2, 3, SJ 6) 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meetjng 0f the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Cal:i:foTniJ., wiLi be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled tmcomj ng meetings: _______ L:.:, _________ _ TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 DISTlnCT 11 -· Wednesday, -~~:_C_!nbe0~76, 6: 00 p. m. (immediately p~eceding Regular Joint Meeting) DISTRICT 11 DISTRICT I -Mond~y. Septcr.1her 13, 1976, 7:00 p.m. H~mt ingt on B1.:"<:"!ch City Ha 11 -Wednesday, Sept:0mber 22, 197(>, S:OO p.lll. (immedi~1tely preceding Executive Committee Meeting) EXECUTJVE Cm!i-HTTl.~E -\\'ednesclay, September 22, 1976, 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALI FOHN IA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVE:.NUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Q170~ (714) 540-2? I 0 (714) 962-24 l l JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Tentative Executive Month Meeting Date Committee Meeting Date September Sep. 8, 1976 Sep. 22, 1976 October Oct. 13, 1976 Oct. 27, 1976 November Nov. 10, 1976 Nov. 24, 1976* December Dec. 8, 1976 None Scheduled January Jan. 12, 1977 Jan. 26, 1977 February Feb. 9, 1977 Feb. 23, 1977 March Mar. 9, 1977 Mar. 23, 1977 April Apr. 13, 1977 Apr. 27, 1977 May May 11, 1977 May 25, 1977 June Jun. 8, 1977 Jun. 22, 1977 July Jul. 13, 1977 Jul. 27, 1977 August Aug. 10, 1977 None Scheduled September Sep. 14, 1977 Sep. 28, 1977 *Thanksgiving Eve -subject to rescheduling MANAG ER'S AGENDA REPORT Cou n"ty Sanitation Districts of O ra ng e County, Cal ifornia JOINT BOARDS September 8 , 1 97 6 -7:30 p .m. Re gu lar Meeting Post Office Box 8 12 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountai n Vall ey, Calif., 92708 Telephones: A rea Code 714 5 40-2910 962-24 11 The following is a brief explanat i o n of the more i mportant, n on -routine i t~ms which appear on the enclosed a~enda and wh ich are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant l ists are now en - closed with the agenda mate rial, summarizing the bills paid since the August Joint Boa r d meeting . Joint Boards No. 8 -a -Approving Plans and Specific ations fo r Administration and Engineering Buildi ng Add~tion and Remodel , Job No . J -7 -3. In August , 1975, the Building Committee was appointed to study the current and futur e o ffi ce space requir ements relative to poss i ble en l argement of the Board Room, completion of the second floor of the En gin e ering -Maintenance wi ng a nd additional office space in the Adminis tration wing. After cons id e r able study by the staff and the Build ing Committee , c haired by Director Norman Cu l ver , the Committee rec ommendations were c onsidered and approved by the Boards at their April, 1976 mee ting and the staff was authorize d to proceed . The fin a l concept has approximately 3500 square feet of useable area in t he bui lding which includes increasing the Board Room fr om 1 140 square feet to 1 800 square feet. This pro j ect has been provided for in the 1976-77 budget in the amo unt of $300 ,000 . It is rec ommende d that bids be received on October 1 2 , 1 976 , wit h possible awar~ at the October Board meeting. Construction could b e schedu led t o commence November 1, 1976 , with completion anticipat ed in May , 1977. No . 8 -b -Award of Specificat i on No . PW -053 , Purchase of Thirty-Two (32) Digest er Dome Hangers . Bids f or the purc hase of 32 d i geste r dome hangers were received on August 3 1, 1976 . Three bids were subm i tted , ranging from a low of $15,508 to a high of $17,280 . It is recommended that award be made to Product i on Steel Co., Inc ., o f Ca rs on , California , for the l o w bid amount of "$15 ,508 for a ll items contained in the proposal , t o be used fo r permanently affixing fl o ating domes to the concrete dige ster s tructure. No. 8-c -Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 t6 Job No . J -6 -lD . Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 for Job No . J-6 -l D, Additional Pumping Facilities for the Foster Ou tfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2 , change the bid date from Au gu st 31 to September 7 to allow additional time for contractors to prepare their bid proposal , and incorporat e several technical clarifications which were suggested by the prospective bidders since the project was adver - tised. The staff recommends approval of these. addenda . No . 8-d -Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to Specification No. E-080. This item appearing on your agenda is for the ·approval of Addenda Nos. 1 ·and 2 to Specification No . E-080; Three (3) Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, to change the bid date from August 24 to August 31 to allow additional time for _ bid submittal and incorporating several technical clari- fications requested by the prospective suppliers . The staff recom- mends approval of these addenda. No. 8 -e -Change Order·· No.· T to J ·ob No. PW -04 7. This Change Order is to 'extend the contract time allowance by 35 days . The contractor obtained and constructed new mo l ds for this project which included new fiberglass duct work at Headworks "C" ventilation system at Plant No. 2. These new molds enabled the contr actor to better comply with the job specific ations and , in fact, to produce a better quality of duct work than required. The staff rec ommends acceptance of this Change Orde r, at no cost to t he Districts, extending the original contract time from 180 days to 2 15 days. No . 8-f -Accepting J ·ob No . ·pw-047 as· Gomp·1ete. The contract or for New Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System has satisfactorily completed a l l the . sp~cified work for this project and has complied with all the contract requirements. The staff recommends acceptance of th.is job. The action appearing on the agenda also authorizes fi ling of the Notice of Completion and approves the Final Closeout Agree - ment. No. 8-g -Chang e Order No . 1 to Job No. PW-052. At the August Board meeting, a contract was awarded to Ins trumentation and Mechanical Systems, Inc., of Fu llerton, for ins tallation of seven automatic gate operators at t he Plant No . 1 Diversion and Metering Structure. The contract, in the amount of $22,688, is a small contract and the staff inadvertently inc luded in the specifications fo r this smal l job, standard insurance re- quirements in the amount of $3 million, which are the limits for a maj,or contract. The contractor ha s request ed a reduction of the requi rement to $1 million and the staff recommends that the Change Order be approved reducing the required coverage from $3 mil l ion to $1 million. · -2- No. 8-h -Accepting Job No. J-9 -2 as Complete. This job to provide for an extension of Surge Tower No. 2 on the 1 20 -inch ocean outfall has been completed in accordance with all the requirements of the contract, and the staff recom- mends acceptance of this project. The action appearing in the agenda authorizes acceptance of the job, filing of the Notice of Completion, and approving the Final Closeout Agreement . No. 8-i -Attendance at Int ernational Public Works Congress and Equipme nt Show September 26-30. The International Public Works Conference to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada, September 26 -30, has scheduled several interesting and informative sessions along with the manufacturers ' e quipment exhibits . Conferences of this nature have proved to b e extremely val uabl e to the Districts in planning for future construction programs, and provide an excellent forum for discussion . The Districts ' Chief Engineer has attended in the past, as well as meetings of the American So ciet y of Civil Engineers, to keep abreast of recent developments and innovatio ns . It is recommended that the Boards approve attendance of the Joint Chairman and Chief Engineer at this Conference and authorize expense r eimbursement in accordance with established policy. No. 8 -j -Authori zation to N'e gotfat·e· -ro·r Purchase of Two Used Trucks for S ludge Hauling . Included in this year's budget is $350,000 for solids handling and disposal equipment. A portion of this bud get amount wa s antici- pated to be used for dump trailers and tractors for hauling of centrifuged sludge to drying areas at both Plant sites . Small dump trucks are presently being used and they are rapidly approaching the end of their useful life. In an attempt to find equipment more suitable for hauling of wet centrate sludge, which contains approximately 80% water, the staff has experimented with several methods which included dump trailers, dump trucks, and transit mix concrete trucks . The latter method is quite innovated and proved so succ essfu l that the staff is recomme nding the purchase of two used eight-yard transit-mix concrete trucks for the purpose of handling the centrifuged sludge at both plants . Three sources of supply that specialize in th is type of used equipment have been l ocat ed and we estimate that the cost will n o t exceed $9,000 per unit, plus applicable sales taxes. I t i s , therefore, recommended that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate for purchase of two used eight -yard transi t -mix tru c k s and to issue a Purchase Orde r for said equipment in an amount not to exceed $18,000 plus applicable sales and use taxes. -3- No. 8-k -Authorizing Purchase of Atomic Absorption Spectro- photometer. Included in the 1976-77 budget are funds for the purchase of an atomic absorption spectrophotometer for use by the laboratory in connection with implementation of the expanded industrial waste monitoring prog ram. Our present Model 305 atomic absorption spectro- photometer was manufactured by Perkin-Elmer Corporation of Santa Ana. Laboratory personnel have evaluated several comparable in- struments and have determined that the Perkin-Elmer Model 307-A will provide greater flexibility than any other instrument in this price range and also allow for standardization of component parts. This additional unit will allow analyses of heavy metals and toxic con- taminents in the industrial waste in connection with enforcement of the Industrial Waste Ordinance. Our present atomic absorption equipment is used principally for monitoring the wastewaters relative to NPDES Permit requirements. It is, therefore, recommended that the General Manager be authorized to issue a Purchase Order to Perkin-Elmer Corporation of Santa Ana for acquisition of a Model 307-A Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer for the amount of $8,500 plus applicable sales and use taxes and freight charges. No. 8-1 -Authorizing Purchase ·or Tn-Sewe·r "Sample·rs for Industrial Waste Monitoring Program. The staff has evaluated several commercially-available waste- water samplers which can be installed in sewers for the purpose of monitoring the sewer system and the industrial waste contained therein. After a thorough evaluation, it is recommended that the staff be authorized to negotiate with ISCO, Environmental Division of Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of purchasing eleven waste- water samplers, and to issue a Purchase Order for a maximum amount . not to exceed $15,000, exclusive of tax and freight,. for said equipment. Approximately $16,500 was budgeted this _year for samplers and flow meters · required by the rndustrial Waste Division to imple- ment the new industrial waste monitoring program. No. 8-m -Authorizing Purchase of Emerg ency Bypass Piping. Included in the approved 1976-77 budget is an item in the amount of $4,427 for purchase of 12-inch aluminum pipe and couplings for use in temporary emergency bypass operations. Our Purchasing Division has solicited proposals and determined that only one source of supply is available for said piping which is compatible with our existing equipment. It is therefore recommended that .the Manager be authorized to issue a Purchase Order to Pomona Irrigation Equip- ment Company in the amount of $4, 964 .97, for acquisition of approximately 600 feet of 12-inch aluminum pipe and couplings for emergency bypass piping. -4- No. 8-n -Authorizing 1/2 Range Increase in Salary for Chief of Indu strial Waste . Mr. John Thomas , Chief of the Industrial Waste Sect i on , has recently received notification that he has successfully passed the State examination for registration in civil engineering. In r ecog - nition of this accomplishment , we are recommend ing that Mr . Thomas be granted a 1/2 step increase in salary. This recommendation is consistent with past policy for other members of the Engineering Department who have successfully passed this State registration examination. The action appearing on your agenda reclassifies Mr. Thomas' position from Range 61B ($1,583 to $1~973 ) to Range 62 ($1,627 to $2027) effective September 10, 1976 . ·No. 8-o -Request for Two New Position Classifications . Clerk ( $4. 4 O Maximum. hourly rate): The Director of Finance is · recommending that a new entry level clerical position be estab - lished to provide greater flexibility in salary assignments for beginning clerical personnel . The r~quest is for the position classification only and would not result .in authorization for additional personnel . The new classification is recommended as it will effect future payroll savings for the Districts . ··Administrative Aide (Range 647C -$844 to $1,026): The Assistant to th~ Chief Engineer has recently resigned from the Districts and the posit i on (Range 655A -$1 ,222 to $1,499) will be deleted from the organizational chart . Certain duties previously assigned to this classification will not be transferred to other Engineering Depart - ment personnel . However, it is necessary to reassign the responsi - bilities for providing and coordinating general public information , conducting plant tours and other administrative tasks. The staff therefor e recommends that the classification and one pos ition of Administrative Aide be established at the salary rec ommended above . (Range 647C) which will result in an estimated annual payrol l savings of $5,676 . The action appearing on the agenda autho r iz es the addition of the above two classifications and one pos it ion t o the Districts ' Positions and Salaries resolution effective September 10th. Dis trict No. 2 No. 8-p -Acceptin Grant of Easement from Ernest Bryant et al re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts 2 -1 -and 2 -1 -5 . The District 's staff , consulting engineer and General Counsel working within the guidelines of the appraisal prepared for the ' Santa Ana River Interceptor, have concluded t he negotiations for the right of way for the permanent and temporary easements for the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Yorba Regional Park to the Gre en River Golf Course. The permanent easement is 30 ' in width and the temporary easement is 90 ·' in Width . The cost of both will be -5- shared by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority in accordance with their agreement with the District relative to the interceptor. The agreement provides for compensation to the property owner for removal and loss of production of citrus trees, in addition to the compensation for temporary use of the construction easement and the permanent use of the sewer easement. The staff recommends approval of the Purchase and Sale Agree- ment and acceptance of the Grant of Easement, and authorization for payment of $42,030 as set forth in said agreement prepared by the General Counsel. No. 8-q-r-s-t -Change Orders Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 10 to Contract No. 2-14-4, Santa Ana River Intercept or. These four change orders conclude the additional work and modifications to the specifications for completion of this major reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor which extends from La Palma Avenue and Imperial H1ghway to Gypsum Canyon. Change Order No. 7 in ttte amount of $1,423.82, is for water- line utility interference and for the relocation of three manholes as requested by the Yorba Linda County Water District to better accommodate future connections anticipated to serve their local sewer system. Change Order No. 8, in the amount of $8,320, is for rental costs sustained by the contractor as a result of delays encountered in the coordination and scheduling of the contract work for the Yorba Regional Park and this reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor. The District's contractor was directed to proceed on the basis of a proposed schedule by the County 's Environmental Management Agency which, because of circumstances beyond the control of the EMA, they w~re unable to meet. The cost of this extra work is for standby of the rental equipment necessary to construct the interceptor through the Yorba Regional · Park. - I Change Order No. 9 is for additional costs in the amount of $6,808.0l incurred by the contractor while boring at the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway because of encountering a low sewer of the City of Anaheim which was constructed to a grade different than that shown on the as-built plans of the City. Change Order No. 10 i s the normal change order for the adjust- ment of engineer's quantities of the actual work performed. This change order is for a net deduction in the amount of $2,953. It should be noted that all change orders have been approved by the State and that the grant program will pay their proportionate share of this additional cost. Total change orders for this project are in the amount of approximately $79,574 , which is less than 2/10 of 1 % of the original contract price. The staff recommends acceptance of these change orders totaling a net addition to the contract of $13,598.83. -6- No. 8 -u -Accepting Contract No . 2 -14-4 as Com ple te. This contract ·ror the installation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor from the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway, which spans a distance of approximately 26 ,000 feet , is complete and the contractor has complied with all provi sions of the contract. Work has been i nspected by the District 's staff and consulting engineer and all requirements of the affected property owner s (Ernest Bryant, et a l; Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company; City of Anaheim) have been met . The contractor has dilig ent ly prosecuted the work and has completed this contract 142 days ahead of schedule . The State Water Resources Control Board has inspect ed this i~stallation during the course of construction and has verbally commended the contractor and the staff for the com- pletion of this Regional Interceptor Sewer . The staff recommends adoption of the resolution included in the agenda material authoriz - ing filing of the Notice of Completion and execution of a Final Closeout Agreement . No. 8 -v -Rec·eive ; File ·and· De·ny Fo·r ·m:a l Prot est and Claim of Contractor Regarding Contract· No .· 2 -T6-2·,-· Yorba Linda Force Main . The contractor, in perform i ng the work for installation of the Yorba Linda Force Main , was directed by the staff to comply with the specifications to backfill certain areas excavated within the street right of way within certain time limi ts to mitigate the i mpacts. on commercial developments within the City o f Fullerton . Th e c ontractor was instructed to cease construct i on operations on the force main sewer until such time as the backfi ll operations had been successfully completed . The contractor has filed a c l a im in the amount of $67,960 .85 for costs inc urre d during this "shut-down " of operation . The Chief Engineer has denied the contractor's claim and , i n accordance with Section 8 -4 of th e Standard Specifications for this contract , the contractor is filing a formal protest with the Board for their con -· sideration . Copies of the contractor 's claim and the Chief Engineer 's denial of said claim a r e included in your agenda mater~al . It is recommended that the claim be denied and that the Board uphold the Chief Engineer 's final decision . Di s tri ct No. 3 No. 8 -w -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No . 3 -BR -l . Thi s change order i s for a t ime allowance of 68 calendar days to the contract for Manhole Replacement , Los Al amitos Subtrunk . The contract or experienced delays due to lack of availability of spec i fied materials for the job . Th e project is for replacement o~ two man - h o l es and the contractor was working at the Di str~ct 's direction to replac e the manholes while allowing continu e d operation of the sewer system . The staff recommends ·approval of this change ord e r for a time extension . · -7- No. 8-x -Accepting Job No. 3 -8R -l as Complete . The contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has completed the replacement of the two ma nholes on the Los Alamitos Subtrunk required on this job and complied with all t he contract requirements. The staff, therefore, recommends acceptance of the work as complete, filing of th e Notice of Completion, and approva l of the Final Closeout Agreement . No . 8 -y -Autho riz ing Negotiation of En g ineering Fee for Design of Westside F o rce Main , Second Phase. The District 's staff has monitored increasing flows being re - ceived by the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station and has determined that the second force main unit to transport se wa ge from this pump - ing station to the Knott Intercept qr ·sewer should now be constructed in · accordance with the Ma~ter Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No . 3 . In the recently -adopted budget, $920,000 was included for this project . The Boards-adopted policy for the selection of professiona l engineering services provides that when a consulting engineer has satisfact or ily compl eted one phase in the development of a project and the Board determines that it would be in the best interest of the District to r e tain this firm for subsequent phases of the work, then the Se lection Committee may proceed directly with fee ne got i a - t i ons with the engineer. This provision is particularly applicable and generally most cost-effective when a firm has completed a Master Plan Report and is thoroughly familiar with the needs and similar projects of the District . This j ob should be expedited because o f the very favorable bids being submitted by contractors on sewer construction work at this time . Boyle Engineering Corporat i on prepared the District 's Master Plan and de signed the facilities to wh ich this force _main will connect. It is, t herefore, r ecommended that the staff be authorized to negotiate directly with said firm for services to prepare the plans and specif1cations for this project . District No. 5 No. 8 -z & aa -Chang e Order Nos. 1 and 2 t o Contract No. 5 -20A . The~e change orders are f or the purchase of approximately 1 ,000 additional linear feet of 24 -inch Class 50 ductile iron pipe and appurtenant fittings which will extend the cast iron portion of t h e sewer fr om the Back Bay right of way along Big Canyon to the Jam boree Pump Station . After discussions with the affected agencies , in- cluding the Departme n t of Fish and Game, the City of Newport Beac h and the Coastal Commission , and after a thorough review of the archaeologi st 's rep ort for this facility, it was decided that it would be in the best interest o f all concerned if the project were revised to construct this portion in cast iron pipe in lieu of the -8- original propo sed vitrified clay pipe. This material will oe furnished to the contractor that will in st al l the pipe for which bids are to be received on September 14th. The staff rec ommends approval of these change orde rs in the total amount of $24,285.62 . No . 8 -bb -Authorizing General Manag er t 6 Award Contract No . 5-20 -Back Bay Trunk Sewer . Bid s f or the installat ion of the sewer pipe purchased for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer are schedu l ed to be received on September 1 4 , which i s after the September 13 hearing on this project by the Regional Board of the Ca lifornia Coastal Zone Conservation Com- mission. The staff and consulting engineers have reviewed this project with all affected agencies and have incorporated into the plans and specifi cations those requirements necessary to meet the needs of those agencies. Since it is critical t o complete the con- struct ion of this facility before December 1 , 1976, it wi ll be necess ary to award a contract after receipt of the Coastal Com - mission approval but pr~or to the Oc tober Board mee ting. It i s, therefore, recommended that the General Manager be authorized to award the cont r act for the bids to be received and opened, in an amount not to exceed $275 ,000 , upon approval of the project by the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission . District No . 7 No. 8 -cc -Initiation of Annexation Procee d ing s -·Annexation No. 57 -Tract No. 925. ·Last month , the Board r eferred a request for the annexation of 7.849 acres in the Lemon Heights area in unincorporated territory to the staff for study and recommendation . The proposed development meets the District 's low dens i ty residentia l criteria established for this area in the District 's Maste r Plan . The staf f rec ommen ds that the Board adopt Resolution No . 76 -170 -7 , initiating annexation proceedings. No. 8 -dd -Initiation of Annexation Proceed ings -Annexation No. 58, Baker Annexation. At the August Board meeting, the Board referred to the staff fo r recommendation , a request for annexation of 1 3 .410 acres located northwest of Peters Canyon , adjacent to Sirrine Drive in the unincor - porated area outside Di strict No . 7 . The proposed d e velopment meets the District's l ow density resid ential criteria established for this area in the Di strict 's Master Plan a nd the r efore the staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No . 76-171-7 initiating annexat i on proceedings . No. 8 -ee -Ordering Annexation No .· 48 -Tract No . 5369 . This item appearing on the agenda orders the annexation of -9- 6.647 acres to the District, which i s northwest of Peters Canyon Road adjacent to Sirrine , Mira Vis ta and Ove r hill Dr i ves in the u nincorporated territory of the District. The Board authorized initiation of proceedings for annexation in March , 1 976 . LAFCO approval has been received and the proponent has paid the required fees. It is the staff 's recommendation that Resolution No . 76 -172-7 be approved . No. 8-ff -Request for Annexat i on ·-·Tract No . 9072 . The District haE received a formal request for annexation of 10.04 acres which i.s locat ed on the south side of Bond Avenue 660 f eet east of Rancho Santiago in the City of Orange . It is recom- mended that the request of the property owner be referred to the staff for report and recommendation to the Board . No . 8 -gg & hh -Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 to Contract No . 7 -6 -9 . Change Order No . 1 is for addition of backfill material as re - quire d in the specifications at the bid stipulated unit price for a total of $9,1 36, and replacement of a private roadway and barricade rental in the amount of $6 ,191 , which was deleted from the original bid document but would have normally been included as part of the original work required of the contractor. Change Orde r No. 2 for adjustments of engineer 's quantities is a deduction of $425 .80 . These chang e orders increase the original amount of the contract by a net of $14,901 .20 , or approximately 5%. The staff recommends approval. No . 8 -ii -Accepting Contract No . 7~6-9 a~ ·complete . The contractor , Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has completed the installation of this portion of the Tustin -Orang~ Trunk Sewer and has complied with all requirements of the contract documents . 7500 feet of 24 -inch, 21-inch, and 18 -inch diameter pipe was in- stalled in the El Modena area, beginning at the intersection of Spring Street and Santiago Boulevard and terminating at Linda Vista and Santiago in the City of Orange. The staff recommends adoption of t he resolution attached to the agenda ma teria l authorizing the filin g of a Notice of Completion and execution of a Final Closeout Agreement . It should be noted that the contractor completed this contract within the time allotted for the project , 56 days prior t o the exp iration date. This project completes the Tust in-Orange Trunk Sewer within the present District No. 7 boundaries . District No. 11 No. 8 -j j -Chan ge Order No . 2 to Contract No . 1 1 -lR-l . This change order adjusts the engineer 's quantities for a tota l -10- deduction of $731 . The origina l plans specified that the contractor r epa i r a manhole in the State Highway (Beach Boulevard) .and the work was delayed by the State Department of Transportation for an encroach- ment permit to inspect the manhole. After thorough examination of the manhole, it was found that it would not need repair and was, therefore, deleted from the contract . The staff recorrunends approva l of this change order. No . 8-kk -Acceptance of Contract No . 11-l R-l. The contractor, Rewes Schock, has completed. the repair or replacement of manholes on the Newland Delaware Trunk and has com- p l ied with all requirements of the contract documents. With deletions and adjustments, the final contract cost was $1,871 lower than the original contract price, or approximately 5% under the original con - tract amount . The staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing f iling of the Notice of Completion and execution of. a Final Closeout Agreement. Each District No. 10 -Establishing 1976 -77 Use Charge Fees for Class I and Class II Industrial Waste Dischargers. The Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance, which became effective Ju l y 1st of this year, provides that the respective Boards establish unit charges to industrial dischargers for conveying, treating and disposing of sewage through the Districts' facilities based upon the annual bud get . Class I industrial dischargers are the major indus - tries in the County which will discharge volumes in excess of 50,000 ga l lons per day or discharge wastewaters whic h have a strength 50% greater than domestic sewage or are discharging constituents that are considered incompatible with the Districts' sewerage system . Class II dischargers are the industries which discharge mor e than 10,000 gallons per day but less than 50,000 gallons per day and are not required to obtain a Class I permit because their dis - charge has been determined to be compatible with the Districts' sewerage system . Inasmuch as both Class I and II permitt ees are credited in the amount of the annual ad valorem tax levied by the Districts upon the property for which the permit has been iss ued by the District, exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service, each individual District must adopt separate resolutions establishing the use charges because of the varying tax rates within the individual Districts . Now that the 1976 -77 budg ets have b een approved and tax rates set, it is appropriate for the Boards to adopt the resolution appearing on the agenda purs uant to provisions set forth in Section 302 .6 and 303 .1 of the Industrial Waste Ordinance, for Class I and Cl ass II permittees for the respective Districts as follows: -11 - USE CHARGE RATES Cl ass I Cl a ss II Flow SS BOD Dist r i ct # $/MG $/1 000 Lbs $/1 0 0 0 Lbs $/MG 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 i22.oo 13.20 .7.10 17 5 131.00 14 .30 7.70 187 129.00 1 4 .00 7.60 185 129.00 14.00 7 .60 1 8 5 1 19.00 13.00 7 .00 17 0 12 2.00 1 3 .30 7 .20 1 7 4 1 36 .00 14.80 8.00 1 94 All Districts No. 1 1 -Value Engineering for Job No. P2 -23, 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Faci lities at Plant No . 2 . A recent regulation promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency that affects the construction g rant programs is the provision that all projects in excess of $10 million are subject to value engineering procedures to insure that the facilities are constructed in· accordance with the best ava ilable technology and construction procedures . Regulations stipulate that value engineering must be performed by an independent engineering firm, not associated with the de sign engineer . A two~phase procedure for the value eng i neering on the $60 mil lion Improved Treatment Facil ities project a t Plant No . 2 was approved in concept by the Boards at the June 9 th meeting . Phase I wil l involve the evaluation of the process and operation associated with the oxygen activated sludge portion of these facilities. In - cl uded in the agenda material is a staff r eport to be submitted to the State and EPA for their approval . However , to cont i nue on our schedule to submit ·the plans and specifications to the State in April of next year as required by the construction g rant program, it is necessary to employ a firm for said work prior to the October Board meeting . It i s, therefore, recommended that th e Selection Committ ee be authorized to negotiate a fee with Consoer Towns end and Associates in accordance with the policy adopted by the Boards for the employment of professional eng ineering services , and that the District No . 1 Board be authorized to award a contract for value engineering se rvic es at an adjourned Board meet~ng on September 22. -12 - ' . Phase II will emphasize the construction and maintenance value engineering and employ outside contracting consu lt ants to work with several key personnel on the Districts' staff and will be considered at a later date. It has previously bee n reported to the Boards that both phases of value engineering for this project will not exceed $175,000, which is grant f u ndable by the State and EPA. No. 12 -Award of Contract No. J-6-lD, Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station. At the August Board meeting, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for .the installation of pumps , e ngines and gear boxes at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. The major equipment has been purchased under separate contracts approved by the Boards. Since bids for these additional pumping facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station will not be received until next Tuesday , September 7th, the reports of the bid opening will be included in the Wednesday supplemental agenda for the Boards ' consideration . The engineer's estimate ·for this work is $310 ,000 . · Districts 1 and 7 No. 13 -Approval of Final Environmental Impact Report and Plans and Specifications for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-1 . The actions appearing on the agenda formally acknowledge the comments received on the Draft Environmental I mpact Report (received by the Boards in July) for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer , which ex - tends from Sunflower Avenue to Myrtle Avenue along Raitt Street in the City of Santa Ana and approves the Final EIR. The staff and/or District's engineer have been in contact wit h the Publi c Works Depa rtments of all agencies affected and have not receive d any significant adverse comments. Therefore, it is recommende d t ha t the Final EIR be approved. Also appearing under this item is approval of the plans and specifications as prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation und er contract with the District . Approval of the plans and specifica- tions and authorization to receive bids on October 5, 1976, is recommended. The engineer's estimate for this project i s $1,405,000 . Distric't No. 2 No. 22 -En g ineering Services for the Feasibil ity Report Re: Sleepy Hollow Carbon Canyon Drainage Area . Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter received from the State Water Resources Control Board approving the Plan of St udy and -13- _, . the cost associated ther e wi th for the Sl eepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon d r a i nage study . We have several proposals and the Selec tion Committee , i n accordance with the Board pol i cy f or the select i on of pro f essional engineering services, will meet next week on September 7th with the firm which appears to be the best qualified to perform the required services . The Selection Com - mittee will present their recommendations to the Board for con - s iderat i on on Wed n esday evening. Distr i ct No. 5 No . 24 -Annexation No . 7 -Newport~I rvine Coastal Area . Thi s r equest by The Irvine Company proposes the annexation of approximately 3430 acres of the down -coast territory between Newport Beach and Buck Gully Wash . The proposal was discussed at an adjourned Board meeting held August 12 at the Newport Beach Cit y Council Chambers when the Di rectors endorsed Alternate V of t he s t aff report cons i dered at that time . Enclosed with your agenda materia l i s a l etter from the property owner requesting annexation in accordance with said Al ternate and providing a letter of credit for payment of $2 ,139 ,790 as annexation fees for the 1535 acres designated to be developed within the proposed annexation area . The Irvine Company has previously submitted application to t he Local Agency Formation Commission in order that the item can be heard before the Commission at their regular September 22nd meeting. The Genera l Counse l is drafting an agreement re conditions of annexation as directed by the Board on August 12, and will report on same at the meeting on Wednesday . Following the General Counsel 's report , the Board may set final conditions by approving or amending the. draft agreement with The Irvine Company and then proceed with initiation of annexation by adoption of a resolution incorporating said conditions . District No . 7 No . 27 -Further Considerat i on of Proposed Annexation of Orange Park Acres . Enclos e d with the agenda materia l is a report from the General Counsel regarding the remaining procedura l , legal and administrative matters that must be considered by the Board in order to culminate t he annexation and development of the sewer system in the Orang e Park Acres area . Following a review by the General Counsel, the Board may wish to take further actions i n this regard as deemed appropriate by the Directors. -1 4 - II ['.OAP.DS OF Dlr!~CTOr:S County Sanifdion Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE SEPTEMBER 8J 1976 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary ADJOURNMENTS PUSTED •• t(' COMP & M!LEAf;t. .... ':'.".".: .....• FILES S~.'i UP ....... k.:". ....... . RESCLUl IC'.'!S CERTIFIHi;.V LETIEr:S ';;R!TTEN ...... .' ..... .. MINUTES VJRlTTt::N .... k. ... . MINUTES HLED ....... ~ .• ( 4) Consideratfcm-.. o_f motioi:i_-to-~~nd· .fi-le-~excerpt:-s ;-if any. '· '--~ee supplemental ---~fgenda (5) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: 4't\/S District 1 August 11, 1976 regular ti\ I <::> District 2 August 11, 1976 regular IV\' s District 3 -August 11, 1976 regular ~\\~ District 5 August 11, 1976 regular and August 12, 1976 adjourned .~\I~ District 6 -August 11, 1976 regular and August 12, 1976 adjourned :)\\ ~ District 7 August 11, 1976 regular /i\\ ~ District 11 -August 11, 1976 regular .......... J.?.) ALL DISTRICTS l!'ffeR .............. Reports of: r-(~),) Joint Chairman A/C •••• TKLR .-•• w-.. .L.l.~.~.~.~ 'L ((~ General Manager I ..._.....---·-········· .'fer: General Counsel '· / (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of ROLL CALL VOTE ••• _ the joint and individual Districts as fol lows: (Each Director shal 1 be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each ..._,. District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "C" and "F" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (8) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 8(A) THROUGH 8(KK) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further .explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent ·Calendar. ~ + _j Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) 1.~LE, .• ~ .••.......•• LETIER ••..•..•.•..•• A/C ••.• TKLR •••• i~~~~ FILE •..••...•...•••••• ~-':' k l.__L~j&-~ ts=···- A/C .... TKLR . °t~J .. .-.. ~f.:-_._ ... .: ~ 2 ... i~.~~~·-- FILE ............•..... LETTER ...•......•.•• A/C •••• TKLR .•.. ---··-····-··· .... FILE ................ .. LETTER •••••••••••••• A/C •.•. TKLR •••• FILE ···········-···- LETTE$. •. ~-­ we .... TKLR ··- -~~-~:.~ FILE ·······-····-·- LETTER ·······-··- A/C .... TKLR - FILE ·······-··-- LETTER' ......... ~ A/C .... TKL~ .... ~-~~~:.'.":~----~ FILE ···········-··- LETTER ·······-··- A/C .... TKLR •••• -········-······-···-· ,,..._ .................. _...,.. ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-149, approving plans and specifications for Administration-Engineering Building Addition and Remodel, Job No. J-7-3, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on October 12, 1976 See page "G" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-150, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Purchase of Thirty-Two (32) Digester Dome Hangers, Specification No. PW-053, to Production Steel Co., Inc., in the amount of $15,508.00. See pages "H" and "I" (c) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD (d) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Three (3) Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080 (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to 'the plans and specifications for New Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System, Job No. PW-047, granting a time extension of 35 calendar days to the contract with Beverly Pacific Corporation to allow construction of new molds to produce higher quality ductwork. See page "J" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-151, accepting New Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System, Job No. PW-047, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page II K" . {(;) 1 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the J plans and specifications for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, authorizing a reduction in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with Instrumentation and Mechanical Systems, Inc., from $3 million to $1 million. See page "L" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-152, accepting Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman and Chief Engineer to attend the International Public Works Congress and Equipment Show to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada on September 26-30, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in accordance with established policy (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) '~11iE ·: ....... k ...... . LETIER ..•..•..•••••• .._.,. A/C .•.. TKLR .••• D 0 -\,.,. ~~~~~: FILE ••••.. ~ .•...••..•• LETTER ..••••••...••• A/C ...• TKLR .••• ... i: .. ;.:~i ... :!.~ ' ', FILE ••••• : •••.•.•..• - LmER ............•• AfC ;···!KLR .••• '( -. I-~ °NJI:·r:t:o··~ -·-······-·-···· FILE ...•.••.••••••..•• FILE ·······-··-··- LETTER ···········-· A/C .... TKLR •••• .._.,. FILE -~~~~~~:~:::::::::··-·­ LETTER ·····-······· A/C .... TKLR •..• .................... ____ ___ -................. ___ . FILE ···············-,--...... Ci.fll'.!R .• : ..•........• A/C .... TKLR •••• '?~r;, -~ FILE ···········-····· LETTER ••.•••••.•••• A/C .... TKLR ··- FILE ···············- LETTER ············- A/C .... TKLR •••• ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate for purchase of two used transit mix trucks for sludge hauling, and to issue a purchase order for acquisition of said equipment in an amount not to exceed $18,000.00 plus tax (k) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a purchase order to Perkin-Elmer Corporation for acquisition of a Model '3'J°'P.. ~Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer, in the amount of $8,500.00 plus tax and freight (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate with ISCO, Environmental Division of Lincoln, Nebraska, for acquisition of 11 in-sewer wastewater samplers, and to issue a purchase order for a total amount not to exceed $15,000.00 plus tax and freight (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to Pomona Irrigation Equipment Company for acquisition of emergency bypass piping and couplings in the amount of $4,964.97 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-153, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, authorizing a 1/2 range adjustment from Range 61B ($1,583 to $1,973) to Range 62 ($1,627 to $2,027) for the position of Chief of Industrial Waste effective September 10, 1976, in recognition of achieving professional engineer's registration. See page "N" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-154, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, authorizing addition of two new personnel classifications. See page "0" DISTRICT 2 (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-165-2, approving agreement re Purchase and Sale of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easements, and accepting Grantsof Easement from Ernest A. Bryant, Jr., et al. in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contracts Nos. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5; and authorizing payment in the amount of $14,550.00 for permanent easement, $13,500.00 for temporary easement and $13,980.00 for damaged or removed citrus trees, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "P" (q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an addition of $1,423.82 to the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. for utility interference and relocation of certain manhole stations. See page "Q" (r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an addition of $8,320.00 to the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. for extra costs to coordinate construction of the interceptor with Environmental Management Agency through the County's Yorba Regional Park. See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) FILE •.•..•.•...••••• LEITER --········· A/C •.•. TKLR •• FILE .•....•.••..•.•. LETTER ···-··-··· A/C .... TKLR • FILE •••.••...•••..••• c__~rr"ER0. ...... . A /C ...• TKLR ••• .. ~ FILE ···-··-·······- lETIER ·······-· A/C •... TK LR ·- FILE ···-···········- LETTER .••.•••••.•••• A/C •..• TKLR •••• ............................. Fll.E ·····-······- ~~---···· A /C .•.. TKlR •••• ... ~-~ G~~~;:~:? LETTER ···········-· A/c .. @ .:. DISTRICT 2 (Continued) (s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Intercept or, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an addition of $6,808.01 to the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. for extra work re improperly disclosed City of Anaheim local sewer. See page "S" (t) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 10 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $2,953.00 from the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. See page "T" (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-166-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "U" (v) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Formal .Protest and Claim filed by Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., in the amount of $67,960.85, in connection with construction of Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No . 2-16-2. See page "V" (2) Consideration of motion to deny Formal Protest and Claim of Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc . and to· uphold the final decis ion of the Chief Engineer with regard to said prot est and claim fi led in connection with construction of Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2 . See page "W" DISTRICT 3 (w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and s pecifications for Ma nhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-l, granting a time extension of 68 calendar days to th e contract with George Miller Construction Company due to avai lability and delive ry of mat erials . See page "X" (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-167-3, accepting Manhole Repl acement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contrac·t No. 3-8R-l, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "Y" C .d . f . h . . h '~~~ onsi eration o motion aut orizing t e to n e gotiate an engineering fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Force Main, Second Unit (CONSENT CAL ENDAR continued on page 6) -5- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5) FILE ................ . lETTER ............ . A/C .... TKLR •.• ---··········-··-··- ---··--················· FiLE ......... : ....... . LETTER ............. . A/C .... TKLR ... . DISTRICT 5 (z) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material Purchase Only), Contract No. 5-20A, authorizing an addition of $23,980.57 to the contract with U. S. Pipe and Foundry Company for additional ductile iron pipe and fittings. See page "Z" (aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material Purchase Only), Contract No. 5-20A, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for an addition of $304.05 to the contract with U. S. Pipe and Foundry Company. See page "M" . ·c·· _ ..... 1,,1, ·:JP \ . .: . . FILE ....... -·-···· (bb) ... ; , LETTER ·-····-··-... -.....__ __ , FILE ••••.•••••.•••••• Consideration of Resolution No. 76-169-5, authorizing the General Manager to award contract for Back Bay Trunk Sewer, From Newport Dunes to Jamboree Pump Station, Contract No. 5-20, to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $275,000.00, upon approval by the California Coastal.J Conservation Commission See page "00" ., " DISTRICT 7 lLETTElr b. . ..... (CC) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-170-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 7.849 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ranch Hill and Las Luces in the Lemon Heights area (Proposed Annexation No. 57 -Tract No. 8295 to County Sanitation District No. 7) FILE ······--· .. -·- lE~f~'~ A/C •••• TKLR -·· ~I' ,:~i_r ~ (>,.c·t.6' ···-····--··-··--..,...···- -·------------- FILE ·····~···~ .. ·:···! .· -·· ... :::. , I , '-.!::l!ERS. .. ~~- A/C .... TKLR ··- ................. ._ ....... _. file' ..... ~ LETTER ····-···- A/C ~L~,§~~ FILE ................. . LETTER .-.. ·--···- A/C .... TKLR •••• (dd) (ee) (ff) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-171-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 13.410 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of Peters Canyon Road, adjacent to Sirrine, Mira Vista and Overhill Drives (Proposed Annexation No. 58 -Baker Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-172-7, ordering annexation of 6.647 acres to the District in the vicinity of Overhill and Mira Vista Drives (Anne~ation No. 48 -Tract No. 5369 to County Sanitation District No. 7) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Hillcrest Village for annexation of 10.04 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Bond Avenue and Rancho Santiago Boulevard, and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "BB" (gg) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, authorizing an addition of $15,327.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company for backfill and replacement of roadway. See page "CC" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7) -6- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6) FILE ············-··- LETTER ···--··- A/C •... TKLR _ ....................... ___ ----·--·-··-·-···-·-- FILE ···········-··-· -.. LETTEJE •• ,.: •• J: •. _ A/C .•.. TKLR ·-· r~::.~-~---g_·~--- REVISED F:LE ------ LETTER ···--·- A/C ••.• TKLR ·-· .._,, FILE .•.••.•••..•••.••• LETTER_s: ••.••. v. ..•. ...____ A/C .... TKLR .••• -~~ ... ~;~: .. i ...... . DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (hh) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $425.80 from the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Company. See page 'f})D" (ii) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-173-7, accepting Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "EE" DISTRICT 11 (jj) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days to the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV due to the delay in receiving encroachment permit from Caltrans. See page "FF" for a total deduction of 7 31. 00 (kk) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-174-11, accepting Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "GG" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -7- -. ·~ EACH DISTRICT Consideration of the f o llowing resolutions Roll Call Vote or Cast Class I and Class II p ermi trees pursuant to Unan imous Ballot Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use e stablishing u se charges f or prov is i ons of the uniform of Distric t Sewerage Facilities "HH" FILE ...•..•.•....•••.• o f the respective Districts: See page ----- lffiE ~ .. ~J:.:" Class I Fee A/C ••.• TKLR •••• District No. Resolution No . Flow B .O.~.S. Class II Fee .l'f\) "::> ii\\'::, 1 2 3 5 6 7 76-155-1 76-156-2 76-157-3 $122. 131. 129. $13.20 $7 .10 $175 . 14.30 7.70 187. 14.00 7 .60 185. l'''I "> ,'Vqs. NjS J\ltl.5 f'\ t ':> 76-158-5 76-159-6 76-160-7 11 76-161-11 129 . 14 .00 7.6 0 185. 119. 13 .00 7.0 0 170. 122 . 13.30 7.20 174. 136 . 14 .80 8 .00 194. (11) FILE ................ .. ALL DISTRICTS LffiER ............. . A/C .••• TKLR .. .. m E ···········Ni}'S LETTE R .•..•.•.•.. J ~IC ...• TKLR .••. Cons i deration of engaging firm to provide value e n g in eeri ng s e r vices t o as sure cost-effective de s ign of 75 MGD Activated Sl u dge Treatm ent Faci l itie s at Treatment Plant No . 2 in accordance with State and Fe d e ral guid e lines (ap prove d in concept by ·the Joint Bo ards on June 9, 1976): (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file s taff r eport re · s e lection of engin eering firm to provide s aid value engine ering services. Se e page "II" --·····:····-1\°ftS Cb) ~orr-·ca11 Vote or Cast Con s idera tion of Resolution No . 76-175, author i z ing the Sel e ction Committee to negotiate fee with Con s oer_, Townse nd & Associates t o prov i d e value engin e ering services in conjunction with d es ign of 75 MG D LEffiR ....... Unanimous Ball ot A/C .... TKL R .•.. .:L.9..,.~.1-~ a.wo.)\J.~ ·.:J~r:t::.~ ..- Activated Sludge Tr e atment Facilit i es at Tr eat ment Plant No. 2, in accordance with adopted District p r o c edures; a nd au thorizing District No. 1 to aw a rd c ontract for said servic e s. Se e page· "JJ" ( 12) ALL DISTRICTS ITEMS ON (12) Other business and communications or suppl eme ntal a genda items: SUPPLfM ENTAL AGENDA (1~ &\\\~ ~ Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot !ft F~z··""'" ETTER ········- A/C •... TKLR •••• ~.P ... ~-~£-'""' ~A~P..JR. .. J:.j)p.J-J .• Consideration of Resolution No. 76_.162, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-10 , to Skipper & Company in the amount of $ 341~791.00. See pages "A" and "B" -8- (13) DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Consideration of actions relative to the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer: 1·1/11~ 11 . (a) FILE ~tf.w'-.~ LmER ···-····--· AIC .... TKLR •••• ..... -........... -......... ____ _ --............. ____ f-.. FILE ··········f··· ... LmER ···~/········ A/C .... TKL ..•. ·······-·········· ...... (b) .................. .! ..... . I . !!~E. ···~····l··--··- (__~~~-···+-··-( c) A/C .... TK~ ·-· -············-~··-· -··--·········\······ ~ .... ~d) FILE --~-~tl...~i!.~L.Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot LETTER •..........••• _. -.,. Consideration of motion to receive and file comments from the following agencies relative to the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer: (incorporated into addendum of Final EIR) California Regional Water Quality Control Board City of Irvine County of Orange Environmental Management Agency City of Santa Ana C. J. Segerstrom & Sons Southern California Air Pollution Control District City of Tustin Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Environmental Impact Report for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer (Copy enclosed with agenda material) Consideration of motion approving the project for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer and directing the Secretary to file a Notice of Determ~nation for said project in accordance with the Districts' ·Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality.Act of 1970, as amended Consideration of Resolution No. 76-163, approving·plans and specifica- tions for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, From Sunflower Avenue to Myrtle Street, Contract No. 1-14, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on October 5, 1976. See page "KK" A/C .... Ttq.R ···~· 0.;~ i-r ,~ •. -:~ ... :. ..... -... , ........ 14) DI~RICT 1 -................... _ Oth~r .b_µsj.ness ana COmmLl:r:!_!~ations OT ·supp~mentalagenda i terns' if any FILE .••.•..•.•..••• .fl5) LETIER .•••.••••••••• A/C .... TKLR •••• ...................... .-< 16.) (17) (18) (19) (20) FILE ............... - ~ER ............. . ..., (21) A/C .... TKLR .••• DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., September 22, 1976 2·.l1 DISTRICT 3 --------Other business -and comnninications--or -supplementalag-enda items, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn f · .-1~ DISTRICT 6 ~-----.. --~-----·--~~ 'Other business and __ commun1cat1on"S---Or--suppl emental agenda 1 terns, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·: ;i. :J_ D!.STRICT 11 ~--____ _ / Ofhe~business ~icati~s-uppl~da items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:00 p.m., September 13, 1976, at Huntington Beach City Hall ~ · .t.~ -9- ·. (22) DISTRICT 2 (22) Other business a nd communi cations or supplemental agenda items : (a) Consideration of items relative to engagement of firm for preparation of Feasibility Report regarding sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area: ITEMS ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA m i~ .................. (1) l ETTER .............• A/C .... TKLR •.•. Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated Augus.t 25, 1976, from the State Water Resources Control Board approving the plan of study re Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area. See page "C" FILE ....•.•.....•.•.•• (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for said services. See page "D" LETTER ·······-····· A/C •... TK LR •••• ~.:: .. ~~ ···-····················· (3) f:~E~.f~-~r Vote or Cast C / Unanimous Ballot LETTER ....•.••.••••• Consideration of Resolution No .. 76-164-2, approving award of contract to Engineering-Science, Inc. for preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area, in form approved by the General Counsel, for a maximum fee not to exceed A/C .... TKL R •••• P.0-.~1 / . ·······,-··-··-:_···~ ~ ..... ~-<.. ......... . $ 33, 000. 00. See page "E" (23) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn &·;;>3 (24) DISTRICT 5 Further consid eration r elative to propo sed s ewerage service for the ~··~······ down-coast a r ea: LETTER •••••••••.•••• ~ ~~l:. ::;<\::) "lE ----~ LETTER •••..••...•••• ® A/C .... TKLR ..•• ........................... Consideration of motion to receive and file r equest from The Irvine Company for annexation of approximately 3,430 acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to the District. See page "MM" Report of General Counsel re p r oposed agreement with The Irvine Company relative to conditions for annexa tion of the down-coast area to the District ................................. (c) Discussion re conditions of annexation (d) r Cast Unanimou s ~!lot ,, ~ 0/.a1"1) (e) Roll Cafl Vote r~ Unan imo us Ballot ,FILE ···············- LETTER ···········- A/C ..•. TKLR ·-· .......................... .................... ____ _ Consideration of Resolution No. e stablishing coriditions and approving agreement with The Irvine Company relative to annexation of the down-coast area to the District, in form approved by the General Counsel Consideration of Resolution No. a uthorizing initiation of proceedings t"o annex a pproximately 3,430 acres of coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5), a nd incorporating conditions therefor -10- (25) LllfeR ·····--- DISTRICT 5 Othe~____!urS:lnes-s~~--supplernental agenda items, if any A/C .... TKLR -{26) ........................ ____ ., DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn,~ ::l I 15 ·. ~....;. t-.l \~ c 1-1 -·-····-····-··---·· (27) DISTRICT 7 FILE ···-··-······- LmER ····-·····- A/C ·-·TKLR .... (28) (29) Further consideration of proposed Annexation No. 51 -Orange Park Acres Annexation: (a) Report of General Counsel. See page "NN" ~~; Discussion and consideration of further actions re formation of Improvement District and proposed Annexation No. 51 - Orange Park Acres Annexation, as deemed appropriate DISTRICT 7 OtheuusinesS'ancLcornffiunieations c;?supplernental agenda i terns, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn q.·. It -11- DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Director~ &bsent: DISTRICT NO. S o1recto-rspresent: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 8 Directors present: Directors absent: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING July 13, 1977 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL James Sharp (Chairman), Philip L. Anthony, Vernon Evans and Kerm Rima None Henry Wedaa (Chairman), Don Smith, Thomas Riley, John Garthe, Donald Fox, Donald Holt, Jr., Bob Perry, Earl Roget, Donald Roth, George Scott, Donald Winn and Frances Wood None Bernie Svalstad (Chairman), Donald Hudson, Russell Gray, Sam Cooper, Norman Culver, John Garthe, Henry Frese, Don Griffin, Frank Ma1·shott, Richard Olson, Donald Roth, Laurence Schmit, Charles Stevens, Jr., Charles Sylvia, Harriett Wieder and Duane Winters None DoTl Mcinnis, (Chairman), Thomas Riley and Milan Dostal None Kerm Rima (Chairman), Paul Ryckoff and Philip L. Anthony None Pete Barrett (Chairman), Bill Vardoulis, Thomas Riley, Vernon Evans, Francis Glockner, Don Saltarelli and Don Smith None Thomas ~iley (Chairman), Harold ~dwards and Jon Brand None 7/13/77 DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: Directors absent: STAFF ME~IBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Ron Pattinson (Chairman), Norman Gibbs and Laurence Schmit None Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, Rita Brown, Janet Conatser and Hilary Eitzen Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Gail Lynch, Carroll Stone, Bill Knopf, Dan .Suarez and Vicky Suarez A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors. of County Santitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11. * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 7 & 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Receive and file Excerpts re Board Appointment That the minute excerpts from the following agencies regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates, be received and ordered filed; and that the follow- ing representatives be seated as members of the Boards: Entity District(s) Irvine Laguna Beach South Coast County Water District ALL DISTRICTS Annual election of Joint Chairman 7 8 8 Active Bill Vardoulis Jon Brand Harold Edwards Alternate Mary Ann Gaido None Harry Lawrence This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards for election of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary'rcported that Directors Donald Fox, Donald Saltarelli and Donald Winn had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 8, 1977, in accordance with established procedures. After a review of election procedures by the General Counsel, a canvass- ing committee comprised of Directors Mcinnis and Wood and General Counsel Woodruff was appointed by the Joint Chairman. Following responses by the candidates to several questions posed by Directors, the vote was taken by written ballot within the individual Districts and polled by the canvassing committee. After several ballots in certain Districts the committee reported that Director Donald Saltarelli had been elected Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. -2- 7 /13/77 ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by the Annual Election of Vice Boards for election of the Vice Joint Joint ·Chairman Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organi- zation, the Secretary declared the nominations in order for the office of Vice Joint Chairman. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Fox be nominated as a candidate for the office of Vice Joint Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and a unanimous ballot was cast for Director Fox as Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. ALL DISTRICTS Report of Joint Chairman Joint Chairman Saltarelli expressed the appreciation of the Joint Boards to out- going Joint Chairman Winn for his outstand- ing service· during the past three terms, and directed the staff to Chairman Winn. prepare an appropriate conunendation for past Chairman Saltarelli then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for July 27th at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Anthony and Barrett to attend and participate in the discussions. The Joint Chairman announced the Annual Work Conference of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies would be held in Monterey, August 17 -20. Any Directors interested in attending should contact the staff for further arrangements. ALL DISTRICTS ~ppointment of Budget Committee on July 19th. Committee members Dick Olson and Paul Ryckoff. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The Joint Chairman reported that pursuant to the budget deliberations at the regular June meeting, a Budget Committee had been formed and would hold their first meeting are James Sharp, Chairman, Donald Holt, Following a brief announcement of several agenda listing changes, the General Manager reported that preliminary assessed valua- tions for the seven Districts had increased approximately 19% for the 1977-78 fiscal year. Recommended budgets and tax rates of the individual Districts would be' considered by the respective Districts at the regular August meeting. Mr. Harper reported that he had appeared on behalf of the Association of Metropolitan SeKerage Agencies (AMSA) before Senator Muskie's Public Works Committee in Washington to present several alternatives to a single defini- tion of secondary treatment in connection with congressional hearings rela- tive to proposed changes to PL 92-500. The General Manager was optimistic that the definition of "marine secondary treatment" which was worked out by the major West Coast dischargers and supported by the State Water Resources Control Board would receive favorable consideration by the Committee. He also reported that the ad valorem tax issue for funding maintenance and operation costs was still alive. -3- 7/13/77 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reviewed the unique Authorizing execution of position of the Districts with regard to Enforcement Compliance the National Pollutant Discharge Elimina-~· Schedule Letter (ECSL) tion System (NPDES) through which municipal re NPDES Permit sewage agencies are issued permits for dis- charge of wastewater pursuant to PL 92-500. The Environmental Protection Agency has delegated authority to the State to issue NPDES permits in California. However, because the Districts' ocean outfall extends beyond the three-mile limit, EPA has decided that they will also issue a permit. Orange County Sanitation Districts are the only agency in California that is required to obtain permits from both regulatory bodies. The Regional Water Quality Control Board has issued a permit setting forth requirements and compliance dates and EPA is requesting the Districts execute an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letter (ECSL). There were objectional prov1s1ons in the proposed ECSL and in discussions with the EPA, we have been successful in having the ECSL language revised to assure that enforcement would be within the intent of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and, further, that compliance would be contingent upon receipt of construction grants. The General Manager and General Counsel recoIIll~ended that the Boards authorize execution of the ECSL which would allow for discharge of up to 227 MGD during the next five years subject to certain conditions established by the Districts which were described by the General Counsel. Following a general discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards adopt Resolution No. 77-99, authorizing the General Manager to sign the Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letter (ECSL) pertaining to the issuance of the NPDES Permit, subject to certain conditions specified by the Boards of Directors, as set forth in said resolution. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel The General Counsel briefly reviewed his litigation status report which had been provided to Directors with the agenda material. Following comments regarding the difficulties that had been encountered with Hartford Insurance Company, underwriter for several of the Districts' contractors, Mr. Woodruff reported that the problems had apparently been resolved. ALL DISTRICTS Ratif~cation of payment of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund claims Fund Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Districts' claims on the following dates be, and is hereby~ ratified in the total amounts so indicated: June 14, 1977 $ 79,288.84 54 7' 512. 36 $626,801.20 June 21, 1977 $ 80,476.47 474,236.39 $554' 712. 86 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-4", and "C-1" through "C-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Dostal requested that his abstention from voting on Warrant No. 37816 be made a matter of record. -4- 7/13/77 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the "~ following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: Fund June 14, 1977 June 21, 1977 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $93,175.50 $352.00 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-1", and "D-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund June 14, 19 77 $ 50.00 207,749.01 $207,799.01 June 21, 1977 $ 50.00 2,535.63 $2,585.63 in accordance with said claims listed on Page "B-1" and Page "D-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: Fund June 14, 1977 June 21, 1977 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $1,292.56 $6,054.70 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-2" and "D-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT S Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: Fund June 14, 1977 June 21, 1977 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $3,294.39 $191,974.52 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-2" and "D-1", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -5- 7 /13/77 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claim on the following date be, and is hereby ratified in the total amount so indicated: Fund June 14, 1977 Suspense Fund $150.00 in accordance with said claim listed on Page "B-3", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: Fund June 14, 1977 Operating Fund $1,709.74 Facilities Revolving Fund $1,709.74 June 21, 1977 $194.14 200.00 $394.14 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-3" and "D-2", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby ratified in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund June 14, 1977 $9,SOO.OO $9,500.00 June 21, 19 77 $142.66 7.49 $150.15 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-3 and "D-2", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Specification No. A-083 TI1at the bid tabulation and recommendation for purchase of one (1) 4-Wheel Drive "Jeep Universal", Specification No. A-083, be received and ordered filed and that award of said purchase to Brian Chuchuas Jeep, Inc., in the amount of $4,419.95, be approved. -6- 7/13/77 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Stop Notice re Job No. PW-050 That the Stop Notice submitted by C.G.I. (Conte-Glancz Industries) in the amount of $4,139.50 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Installation of Foul Air Treatment at Plant No. 2 Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Superintendent's visits to Denver & Detroit re P2-23 operational evalua- tion Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager's action sending the Superintendent to Denver, Colorado on June 28-30, 1977, for operational evaluation in conjunction with completion of plans and specifications for 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23, be and is hereby ratified and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Superintendent be authorized to travel to Detroit re said evaluation and that reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection said trips be authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Chief of Industrial Waste Division to attend Ninth Mid-Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference 1977; and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Chief of Industrial Waste Division be authorized to attend the Ninth Mid- Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, on August 8 & 9, FURTiiER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith be approved. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Joint Chairman to attend AMSA Conference in -:Hartford, Connecticut Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Joint Chairman be authorized to attend the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Conference on Energy Conservation and Waste Management in Hartford, Connecticut, August 16-19, 1977; and authorizing reimbursement for tr?-vel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred therewith. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from OCEA re employees' handbook be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from the Orange County Employees Association, dated June 1, 1977, relative to employees' information handbook Moved, seconded and duly carried: to plans and specification re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. J-7-3A-2 specifications for Plumbing for Administra- tion and Engineering Building Remodel, Job ~· No. J-7-3A-2, authorizing an addition of $335.24 to the contract with Pacific Plumbing Company of Santa Ana for substitution of plumbing fixtures, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -7- 7/13/77 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 3 to plans and specification re Job No. I-4-lR Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. I-4-lR, granting a time extension of 47 calendar days to the contract· with Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company due to unsuitable weather for welding, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. I-4-lR as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-87, accepting Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. I-4-lR, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Orders to plans and specifications re Job No. Pl-16 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following change orders to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, with Donovan Job No. Pl-16, authorizing the changes indicated to the contract Construction Company of Minnesota, be approved. Change Order No. 17 -Addition of $5,032.25 for construction modifications and time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said work. Change Order No. 18 -Addition of $19,100.00 to provide paving and drainage for storage area. Change Order No. 19 -Addition of $3,705.45 for substitution of pipe, replace- ment of paving and installation of flexible couplings and time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said work. Change Order No. 20 -Addition of $10,279.97 for miscellaneous parts needed and time extension of 42 calendar days for installation of said parts. Copies of these change orders are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to plans and specifications re Job No. P2-23-l Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Flood Wall and Site Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, authorizing a deduction of $8,010.00 from the contract with Pascal. & Ludwig, Inc., for deletion of 1800 feet of communication cable, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- 7/13/77 ALL DISTRICTS Following a brief report it was moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Manager to award contract for print~ ing plans re Job No. P2-23-6 That the General Manager be authorized to receive bids and award a contract for printing of plans for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, to the lowest responsible bidder in an amount not to exceed $22,500. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Phase II of Engineering Building Remodel remodeling project, it was Following a report by Director Culver, Chairman of the Building Committee, regarding complet-ion of Phase I of the administration and engineering building moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to proceed with remodeling of the downstairs portion of the engineering section, Phase II of the Administration and Engineering Building Remodeling, in an amount not to exceed $25,000, as recommended by the Building Conunittee. ALL DISTRICTS Approving plans and specifications re Job No. P2-23-6 Following a brief staff report re a change of the proposed bid date for Job No. P2-23-6, it w·as moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-88, approving plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, and authorizing adver- tising for bids to be received on October 11, 1977. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing execution of agreement with Bird Machine Company for purchase of centrifuge Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-98, authorizing execution of agreement with Bird Machine Company for purchase of one centrifuge for sludge dewatering facilities, in the amount of $210,975.00 plus tax, FOB shipping point, in form approved by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Receive, file and deny request of National Technology for waiver of late penalty charges re Districts' Connection and Use Ordinance ordered filed and denied. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the request of National Technology, dated June 1, 1977, for waiver of penalty charges in the amount of $80.70 relative to late payment for 1977-78 second quarter use charge pursuant to the Districts' Connection and Use Ordinance, be received, Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m., July· 13, 1977. -9- 7 /13/77 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 15 That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 77-89-2, ordering annexation of 26.382 acres to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa Drive and Loma Street (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part 9f these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Proposed Annexation No. 23 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 77-90-2, authorizing initia- tion of proceedings to annex 1.838 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area (Proposed Annexation No. 23 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 6 to County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Referring request from J. L. Argo for annexation of territory to staff re Proposed Annexation No. 25 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request form J. L. Argo, dated June 21, 1977, requesting annexation of .456 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Country Hills Road, be received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 25 -Argo Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 3 to plans and specifications re Contract No. 2-14-3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor and South Santa Ana River Intercep- tor Connector, Contract No. 2-14-3, authoriz- ing a change in pipe size at no cost to the District to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 6 to plans and spctifica.tions re Contract No. 2-14-3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Inter- ceptor and South Santa Ana River Intercep- tor Connector, Contract No. 2-14-3, authoriz- ing an addition of $21,488.91 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for removal of undisclosed cement treated base, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said work, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -10- 7 /13/77 DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifications re Contract No. 2-15-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Pump Station Diversion Manhole, Contract No. 2-15-1, authorizing an addition of $1,905.98 to the contract with Bejac Corporation due to alignment change, be approved. Certified copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 2-15-1 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-91-2, accepting Yorba Linda Pwnp Station Diversion Manhole, Contract No. 2-15-1, as complete; authorizing execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m., July 13, 1977. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Summons and Complaint re Contract No. 3-20-2 and refer to General CoW1sel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Sununons and Complaint for Money, Common Counts, Foreclosure on Labor and Material Bond and on Stop Notice re Case No. 27-04-82, All American Asphalt vs. A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Contractor, Inc., et al., relative to the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2; be received, ordered filed and referred to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract re Contract No. 3-20-2 and refer to General Counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract re Case No. 27-12-69, A. G. Tutor Co., Inc.~ a corporation, and N. M. Saliba, an individual, doing business as N. M. Saliba Company, a Joint Venture, vs. County Sanita- tion District No. 3 of Orange CoW1ty, a Public Corporation, relative to the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2; be received, ordered filed and referred to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICT 3 Status reports re Knott Interceptor and the Orangethorpe Relief The staff advised that a report would be submitted at the next regular meeting relative to the construction of the re- maining reaches of the Knott Interceptor Trunk. -11- 7 /13/77 DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared ~ the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 13, 1977. DISTRICT 5 Amending resolution approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 5-20 (Revised) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-92-5, amending Resolution No. 77-77-5, approving revised plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-20 (Revised), providing for establishment of the bid date upon approval of the project by the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, and authorizing deferral of said bid date if such approval is not forthcoming. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Approving Change Order No. 4 to plans and specifications re Contract No. 5-20A Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to plans and specifi- cations for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material Purchase only), Contract No. 5-20A, authoriz- ing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $4,266.15 to the contract with United States Pipe and Foundry Company, be approved. A.copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Accepting delivery of pipe re Contract No. 5-20A as complete as complete. DISTRICT 5 Receive, file and deny claim of David E. Griswold re Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer and refer to liability insurance carrier for appropriate action. DISTRICT 5 Referring request from The Irvine Company for annexation of territory to staff re Proposed Annexation No. 8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That delivery of pipe in accordance with Contract.No. 5-20A, Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material Purchase Only), be accepted Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim submitted by David E. Griswold, dated June 7, 1977, for damages in the amount of $745.10, in connection with the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer be received, ordered filed and denied and referred to the Districts' liability insurance carrier Following a brief report it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from The Irvine Company for annexation of 1.095 acres of territory to the District in the Harbor View Hills area be received, filed and referred to staff (Proposed Annexation No. 8 -Harbor Ridge Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5) -12- 7/13/77 DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 13, 1977. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 13, 1977. DISTRICT 7 Election of Chairman The Joint Chairman announced that the Chair- manship of County Sanitation District No. 7 had been vacated by virtue of the recent retirement of Director Burton from the Boards of Directors, and it would therefore be in order for the Board to consider election of a new Chairman. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Pete Barrett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrett as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Bill Vardoulis be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tern to fill the vacancy left by election of Chairman Barrett. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Bill Vardoul is as Chairman pro tern. DISTRICT 7 Ordering annexation of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 62) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Standard Resolution No. 77-93-7, ordering annexation of 4.05 acres to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard (Proposed Annexation No. 62 -Tract 8663 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Smith requested that his abstentfon from voting on the item be made a matter of record, and explained his reasons therefor. DISTRICT 7 Referring request from William Frantz for annexa- tion of territory to staff re Proposed Annexation No. 68 received, ordered filed, (Proposed Annexation No. No. 7) . Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from William E. and Chloe B. Frantz for annexation of 4.001 acres of territory.to the District in the vicinity of Morado Drive and Santiago Canyon Road be and referred to staff for study and recommendation 68 -Frantz Annexation to County Sanitation District -13- 7/13/77 DISTRICT 7 Approving Addendum No. l to plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-2-Rl changing the bid date from June copy of the addendum is on file DISTRICT 7 Hearing re proposed Annexation No. 60 Chairman declared said hearing Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifi-'-11 cations for Red Hill Relief Trunk Sewer Manhole Cover Replacement, Contract No. 7-2-Rl 30, 1977, to July 26, 1977, be approved. A in the office of the Secretary of the District. This being the time and place previously set for the hearing on proposed Annexation No. 60 -Tract Nos. 8964 and 8809 to County Sanitation District No. 7, the open at 9:13 p.m. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the summary of the Local Agency Formation Conunission and District No. 7's action re proposed Annexation No. 60 -Tract Nos. 8964 and 8809 to County Sanitation .District No. 7 be received and ordered filed. The Secretary advised that no written protests had been received. The Chair then called for oral protests and, hearing none, tleclared the hearing closed at 9:15 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation of territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. 60) That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-94-7, ordering annexation of 30.359 acres to the District in the vicinity south of Santiago Canyon Road in the City of Orange (Proposed Annexation No. 60 - Tract Nos. 8964 and 8809 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving the revised Director Smith distributed a memorandum relative to the proposed revised agreements for collection of sewer connection charges and requested that the comments contained therein be made a matter of record as agreements for collection of sewer connection charges follows: "Regarding today's agenda item on the transfer of funds collected within Sanitation District No. 7 by Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the cities of Santa Ana and Tustin, I am not opposed to this agenda item, but I am concerned with establishing a precedent that could have an affect on the City of Orange. It is my w1derstanding that Orange is the only city that has utilized their own funds to construct sewer lines.outside of their city limits which were built to the District's master plan and were constructed with the intent-of ultimately selling these lines to the District. Establishing the precedent of transferring the funds collected by the above-mentioned cities to the District would possibly be a detriment to Orange, should the request be made of our city. -14- 7 /13/77 Our position would be that prior to transferring any funds, an amount equal to those monies owed the City for the sewer lines they constructed be deducted and retained on deposit with the City until such time as the City elects to relinquish the ownership of said sewer lines. At that time, the funds would be transferred to the City and ownership of the sewer lines would be transferred to the District." The following actions were then taken: DISTRICT 7 ~proving new ag_rcement with CMSD re collection of sewer connection charg_e_s __ and rescinding agreement re Ordinance No. 705 - Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-95-7, approving agreement with Costa Mesa Sanitary District for collection of sewer connection charges, and rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7, Ordinance No. 705. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving new agreement with City of Santa Ana for collection of sewer connection charges and rescinding agreement re Ordinance No. 705 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-96-7, approving agreement with the City of Santa Ana for collection of sewer connection charges, and rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7, Ordinance No. 705. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving new agreement with the City of Tustin for collection of sewer connection charges ~nd rescinding agreement re Ordinance No. 705 :Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 77-97-7, approving agreement with the City of Tustin for collection of sewer connection charges, and rescinding Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7, Ordinance No. 705. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m., July 13, 1977. -15- 7/13/77 DISTRICT 11 Rccei ve, fi 1 e and approve. Final EIR re Master Plan of Sewer Facilities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Final Environmental Impact Report re Master Plan of Sewer Facilities fo~ Cow1ty Sanitation District No. 11, be approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and that the information contained in said EIR has been reviewed and considered by the Board prior to consideration of approval of the Master Plan Projects. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Tentatively approving Master Plan of Sewer Facilities That the Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation District No. 11, be tentatively approved, subject to approval of trunk sewer alignments within the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission · and State Department of Fish and Game and Parks and Recreation. DISTRICT 11 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1104 re establishing sewer connec- tion charges sewage facilities be read by It was moved, seconded and unanimously carried: That Ordinance No. 1104, an ordinance amend- ing Ordinance No. 1103, establishing sewer connection charges for use of District title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1104 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Or<linance No. 1104, an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 1103, establishing sewer connection charges for use of District sewage facilities be introduced and passed to the second reading on August 10, 1977, at 7:30 p.m., in the District's administrative offices. DISTRICT 11 Approving standard agreement for collection of sewer con- nection charges by City of Huntington Beach and authoriz- ing staff to s1~bmi t to City - Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges by City of Huntington Beach on behalf of the District,. be approved in principle; and, FURTHER ~DVED: That the staff be authorized to submit said agreement to the City for consideration by the City Council. -16- 7/13/77 DISTRICT 11 Report of status re revised agreement with Sunset Beach Sanitary District and the City of Huntington Beach The General Counsel briefly reviewed his written report relative to the proposed revised agreement between the District, City of Huntington Beach, and the Sunset Beach Sanitary District for accepting discharge of the Sanitary District's wastewater. Discussions have been held with the President of the Sanitary District Board, who has verbally concurred with the proposed agreement. There is, however, concern with regard to the financial ability of the Sanitary District to pay the cost of providing sewage service for their increased flows. The General Manager reported he was developing several alternatives and would report back to the Board in the near future. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared· the meeting so adjourned at 9:22 p.m., July 13, 1977. DISTRICT 8 Election of Chairman and Chairman pro tern of the Board The Secretary declared that nominations were in order for the annual election of Chairman of the Board of Directors of CoW1ty Sanitation District No. 8. It was then moved and seconded: That Harold E. Edwards be nominated as candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Edwards as Chairman. It was further moved and seconded: That Director Jon S. Brand be nominated as candidate for the office of Chairman pro tern. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Brand as Chairman pro t~m. DISTRICT 8 Discussion re dissolu- tion of District The staff briefly reviewed the status of District No. 8 with regard to the responsi- bility for sewage service in the Laguna/ Moul ton Niguel vicinity. In recent years the Aliso Wastewater Management Agency (AWMA) has been formed to provide wastewater treatment and disposal in that area. Since AW~~ will provide the services that might otherwise be the responsibility of District No. 8 it appears appropriate for the Board to consider the future of the District and whether or not it should remain in existence or be dissolved. Following a brief discussion of the matter, it was the consensus of the Directors that each should review the matter with the Boards of their respective agencies, following which District No. 8 would convene to further consider the nppropriatc action. -17- 7 /13/77 DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: Approval of 1977-78 Operating Fund Budget Tirnt the District's 1977-78 fiscal year budget be and it is hereby approved and adopted in the following total amount: DISTRICT 8 Total Amount of 1977--78 Operating Fund Budget $633.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said budget is hereby received and ordered filed, and; FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign and budget. DISTRICT 8 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8 be adjourned. the Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m., July 13, 1977. -18- JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~806 37807 37808 37809 37810 37811 37812 ::57813 37814 37815 : 31816 37817 37818 37819 37820 37821 37822 37823 37824 37825 37826 37827 37828 37829 -7830 ~/831 37832 37833 37834 37835 37836 37837 37838 37839 37840 37841 37842 37843 37844 37845 37846 37847 37848 37849 . '37850 37851 37852 37853 37854 7i7855 ..._.;7856 37857 37858 37859 A & W Electric Motors, Tools Admiral Paint Company, Paint Air California, Air Fare Various Meetings Alex Fish Company, Laboratory Supplies Aljac Supply Company, Sand Paper and Emery Cloth American Cyanamid Company, Polymer American Society for Testing, ASTM Standard Manual City of Anaheim, Power Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Tractor Parts Associated of Los Angeles, Electric Supplies Banning Battery Company, Batteries Bassett Office Furniture, Repair Chair Bearing Specialty Company, Seals Beckman Instruments, 0 Rings Bird Machine, Freight Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuild Magtronic C & R Reconditioning Company, Repair Magtronic CS Company, Valve Parts Cal-State Seal Company, Valve Packing California Auto Collision, Repair Body Damage California Lithograph Corporation, Printing & Binding Chemical Marketing Reporter, Buyers Directory Chevron, USA, Inc., Gasoline, Diesel Fuel College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber Compressor Products, Rebuild Valves Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Copeland Motors, Truck Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Daniel Measurements, JPL-Acts Materials John M. Deck, Fuel Tank Deco, Electric Supplies De Guelle & Sons Glass, JPL-Acts Materials Diesel Control Corporation, Governor Parts Homer R. Dulin Company, Calibrate Meter Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies . Hilary Eitzen, Employee Mileage Enchanter, Inc., Ecological Trawl Engard Coatings Corporation, Coatings Fischer & Porter Company, Chlorinator Parts Flow Systems, Pump Parts Foremost Threaded Products, Hardware Clifford A. Forkert, Engineering Services, Oil Lease Survey GAF Corporation, Repair Blueprint Machine General Electric Supply, Instrumentation Panel Georgia Pacific, Plywood General Telephone Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge & Grit Removal Graybar Electric Company, Electrical Fittings Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts Bundley Company, Timer Hykil Weed Control, Cut Weeds "A-1" $ AMOUNT 67.88 53.06 58.40 63.60 418.55 21,376.04 33.79 193.41 290.53 450.42 41.23 55.85 50.41 41.44 33.34 115. 01 675.00 748.64 32.54 240.80 2,767.66 28.00 3,680.22 187.15 470.80 601. 30 2,742.22 65.30 372. so 57.98 27. 77 991. 74 30.74 4.32 75.00 309.78 32.34 3,000.00 458. 71 1,321.08 665.69 36.84 352.57 55.78 453.45 582.07 77 .40 35.70 8,605.75 17.94 26.99 310.42 136. 71 535.00 .JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID .JUNE 14, 1977 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 37860 37861 37862 37863 37864 37865 37866 37867 37868 37869 37870 37871 37872 37873 37874 37875 37876 37877 37878 37879 37880 37881 37883 37884 37885 37886 37887 37888 37889 37890 37891 37892 37893 37894 37895 37896 37897 37898 37899 37900 37901 37902 37903 37904 37905 37906 37907 37908 37909 37910 37911 37912 37913 37814 International Harvester Company, Truck Parts Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Kaman Bearing & Supply, Seals Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Valves Kelco Sales & Engineering Company,. Nozzles King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Seals, Couplings Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Tools LBWS, inc., Regulator Parts, Tools L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Service Laursen Color Lab, Photo Processing Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lamps Long Beach Safety Council, OSHA Manual Los Angeles Times, Employment Advertisement Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Equipment Parts George Miller Construction, Raise Manholes Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Lumber Supply, Hardware National Sanitary Supply, Janitorial Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water Orange County Farm Supply Company, Insecticide Orange County Flag & Banner, Flags Oxygen Service, Lab Gases Pacific Telephone Company Parts Unlimited,, Auto Parts M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauge Perkin-Elmer, Lab Analysis Photo & Sound Company, Workshop B. Dalton Pickwick Book Store, Handbooks Postmaster, Postage llarold Primrose Ice, Sampling Supplies Printec Corporation, Specification Supplies The Register, Employment Advertisement Safety Service & Supply, JPL-Acts Materials Santa Ana Blueprint, Blueprints Sargent Welch Scientific, Laboratory Supplies City of Seal Beach, Water Seal Methods, Inc., Packing Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools See Optics, Safety Glasses S. F. Serrantino, Et1ployee Mileage Service Motor Parts, Repair Engine Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee ~lileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Smith Brothers, Closure Plates Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern California Edison So Cal Sign Company, Signs South Orange Supply, PVC Pipe Fittings Southern California Gas Southern California Water Company, Water Speedc Speedometer, Gauges Starow Steel, Steel "A-2" - $ AMOUNT 228.43 ~ 1.90 44.42 375.24 187.81 96.58 104.94 212.65 166.58 1,125.51 39.49 229.47 73.20 38.52 73.37 1,700.00 1,410.39 193.89 127.20 5.36 353.20 110. 69 115. 43 55.12 20. 71 43. 91 ''-"" 213.25 25.00 308.82 500.00 15.90 497.77 41.34 235 .11 34.87 348 .40 8.23 125.12 93.12 31.80 52.14 1,188.41 649.48 52.74 68. 50 . 68.90 395.00 7,254.90 53.00 28.29 962 .69 ~· 7.03 49.31 403.19 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~915 37916 37917 37918 37919 37920 37921 -37922 '37923 37924 ·37925 '37926 37927 37928 37929 37930 37931 37932 The Suppliers, Tools C. O. Thompson Petroleum, Kerosene Thorpe Insulation, JPL-Acts Materials Trexler Compressor, Valve Parts Truck and Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J. G. Tucker & Son, Oxygen Cell Repair US Plastic, JPL-Acts Materials United Parcel, .Delivery United States Equipment, Gaskets Utilities Supply Company, Tools Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Wallace & Tiernan, Flow Meter Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage John M. Wright, Employee Mileage Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies "A-3" $ AMOUNT 758.13 81.92 41.18 159.42 194.97 96.38 334.65 27.20 209.64 88.90 397.50 738.49 552.04 54.06 157. 71 15.30 6.75 371.42 $ 79,288,84 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 37792 37793 37794 37795 37796 37797 37798 37799 37800 37801 37802 37803 37804 37805 Campbell llcating & Air Conditioning, Contractor J-7-3A-1 John Carollo Engineers & Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2-23 Consoer, Townsend and Associates, Value Engineering P2-23 Desert Dynamics, Winch Designed Facilities Leasing Company, Trailer Rental Oonovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16 Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment Hoagland Engineering, Contract Management Pl-16 McCalla Brothers, Contractor E-080 Pepsi Company Building Systems, JPL Office Rent Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel, Contractor I-4-lR Productool, Inc., Platform Truck Skipper and Company, Contractor J-6-lD Southern California Testing Labs, Testing Pl-16 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF "A-4" $ AMOUNT ""' 4,873.50 209,121.36 5,273.84 592.94 80.10 232,496.02 205.63 15,985.50 9,859.60 62.54 20,492.10 149.73 48,282.60 36.90 $ 547,512.36 $ 626,801.20 INDIVIDUAL DISTRIC1S CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ·33752 33753 . 33754 Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 1-14 Bubalo and Artukovich, Contractor 1-14 Smith Emery, Testing 1-14 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 33755 Local Agency Formation, Annexation 18 Processing Fee 33756 33757 33758 33759 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 Bejac Corporation, Contractor 2-15-1 Engineering-Science, Inc., Feasibility Report Sleepy Hollow Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-3 "B-1" AMOUNT $ 1,013.50 92,016.00 146.00 $ 93,175.50 $ 50.00 $174,100.00 17,004.60 15,635.41 1,009.00 $207,749.01 $207,799.01 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMU L!UED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 33760 33761 33762 33763 33764 33765 33766 33767 33768 33769 33770 33771 33772 33773 33774 33775 33776 33777 33778 33779 33780 33781 33782 33783 33784 33785 33786 33787 33788 City of Anaheim, Striping 3-20-3 Ameren Pipe Group, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Ampac, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 John Artukovich & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Vido Artukovich & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Associated Concrete, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Bennett Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Christene Corporation, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Montie Carter Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Cote Mark, Inc., Refund Payment Plans &·Specs 3-20-3 R. E. & R. W. Crane, ·efund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Richard E. Hampton Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Hood Corporation, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Hydro Conduit, Refund Payment Plans·& Specs 3-20-3 KEC Company, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Mike Masanovich Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Merco Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Andrew Papic & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Pascal & Ludwig, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Joe Petrovich, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Mike Prlich & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Steve Rados, Inc., Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Smith Electric Supply, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Sully Miller, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Tutor & Saliba, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 Jim Walter Corporation, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 R. A. Wattson Company, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3 DISTRICT NO. S · ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown and i3earwitz, Legal Services 5-20 Simpson-Steppat, Engineering Services 5-20 "B-2" '-"' AMOUNT $ 942.56 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10. 00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 ~ 10.00 30.00 20.00 40.00 10.00 $ 1,292.56 $ 2,560.39 734.00 $ 3,294.39 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID' JUNE 14, DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 ~ SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 33789 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19 33790 County of Orange, DISTRICT NO. 7 ·oPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Election Services re Annexation No. 51 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 33791 Ultrasystems, Inc., EIR re Master Plan "B-3" 1977 AMOUNT $ . 150.00 $ 1,709.74 $ 9,500.00 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FOND WARRANTS 37964 37965 37966 37967 37968 37969 37970 37971 37972 37973 37974 37975 37976 37977 37978 37979 37980 37981 37982 37983 37984 37985 37986 37987 37988 .37989 37990 37~91 37992 37993 37994 37995 37996 37997 37998 37999 38000 38001 38002 38003 38004 38005 38006 38007 38008 38009 38010 38011 38012 38013 38014 38015 38016 38017 38018 Alaska Constructors, Refund Overpayment Plans & Specs P2-23-2 $ American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Cyanamid Company, Polymer Amonco Tool, Repair Lathe The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing V. B. Anderson, Welder Parts Associated of Los Angeles, Electric Supplies Barnes & Delaney, Water Screen Parts Bearing Specialty Company, Oil Seal Blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt LD Brinkman/Greenbaum Division, Tile Cutter CS Company, Bearings California Alloys Company, JPL-ACTS Repairs California Association of Sanitary Agencies, Conference Registration R.B. Clapp Company, Timer College Lumber, J-7-3 Materials Conrock Company, Concrete J-7-3 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Continental Radiator, Repair Radiator Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Controlco, JPL-ACTS Materials Cooperative Personnel Service, Personnel Tests Burt Court/Precision Pump, Pump Parts Mr. Crane, Crane Rental Charles P. Crowley, JPL-ACTS Supplies Culligan Deionized Water Service, Deionized Water C. R. Davis Supply, Hardware Deco, Electric Supplies DeGuelle & Sons Glass, Glass Dico Company, Equipment Parts Eco Air Products, Filters Enviro Development Company, Operations Manual Envirotech, Skimmer Parts Filter Supply Company, Filters Fischer & Porter Ccmpany, Recorder Parts Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts Foremost Threaded Products, Hardware Foster Gardner, Chemicals City of Fullerton, Water General Telephone Company Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge & Grit Removal Harrington Industrial, JPL-ACTS Materials Hasty Lawn & Garden, Repair Mower Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing, Leased Vehicles Hi Flex International, Hose Honeywell, Inc., Charts City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Alloys, JPL-ACTS Supplies Huntington l3each Equipment Rental; Equipment Rental 1-C Electronic, Transistors Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pipe Fittings Kelco Sales & Engineering, Equipment Parts King Bearing, Couplings, V Belts, Rings Kingmann-Whi te, Inc., Instrumentation Supplies "C-1" AMOUNT 35.00 ·~ 788.87 4 ·, 947. 04 355.35 118 .19 69.28 284. 08 1,552.20 52.69 33.59 79.45 93.44 4,803.40 50.00 56.15 37.31 1,112.42 100 .. 23 111. 92 8,015.72 200.70 85.00 21.55 301. ·oo 1,590.00 40. 00 '-' 330.36 499.47 19.47 241.68 24.42 530.00 486.74 107.36 610.81 94.58 163.62 125.08 38~80 2,953.20 8,829.25 42.15 151. 09 315.00 743.54 18.73 68.58 10. 92 4,020.00 33.92 33.10 """"' 125.35 218.00 235.78 98.26 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977 WARRANT NO. ~19 38020 38021 38022 38023 38024 38025 ~8026 38027 .38028 ·38029 38030 38031 38032 38033 38034 38035 38036 38037 38038 38039 38040 38041 38042 ... "043 _,-044 38045 38046 38047 38-048 38049 38050 38051 38052 38053 38054 38055 38056 38057 38058 38059 3'8060 38061 38062 3'8063 38064 38065 38066 38067 "~068 ~069 38070 38071 38072 38073 Knox Industrial Supp lies, Hardware LA·X-Ray, JPL-ACTS Welding X-Ray Inspection LBWS, Inc,, Hardware, Tools, Demurrage, Oxygen L & N Uniforrr Supply, ·Uniform Service Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lamps Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints Mine Safety AppliaHces, Sampling & Safety Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, MH Rings & Covers National Lumber Supply, Building Materials Orange County Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher Maintenance Void Orange Valve & Fitting, Hardware Pacific States Electric Wholesale, Light Fixtures Peterson Company, Repair Buoys B. Dalton Pickwick, Books Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Porter Boiler Service, Repair Boiler Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Supplies Quality Building Supply, Cement Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Relief Printing Company, Printing of Business Cards Reynolds Aluminum Supply, Aluminum Roseburrough Tool, Tools Sand Dollar Business ·Forms, Printing Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products~ Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools Service Tape & Label Company, Specification Supplies Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Sims Industrial, Safety Equipment Smith Electric Motors, Repair Electric Motor Southern California Edison So Cal Sign Company, Signs Southern California Gas Company Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Standard Brands Paint Company, J-7-3 Materials Star-Lite Barricade, Barricade Rental The Suppliers, Tools J, Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Tools for Industry, Tools Trexler Compressor, Inc., Valve Parts Truck and Auto Supply, Truck Parts Union Oil Company, Gasoline Union Oil Gas Division, Line Relocation 2-17-1 U. S. Sports Netting, Repair Trawl Net United Parcel Service, Delivery University of Irvine Regents, JPL-ACTS Computer Model Utilities Supply Company, Tools Valley Cities Supply Company, Hand Cleaner Valvate Associates, Pipe Fittings VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Varec, Inc., Flame Arrestor John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Western Electronic, Relay Western Wholesale Company, Bla<lc "C-2" AMOUNT $ 379.29 216.02 442.82 87.75 33.83 4.96 253.34 184.33 164.87 482.12 68.90 765.60 2,112.93 44.15 72.82 108.12 15.90 381. 20 133.70 44.52 508.67 45.85 127.20 195.89 78.18 67.26 159.16 342.06 135,41 113. 62 6,804.93 116. 60 1,172.39 111. 31 1'17 .15 60.00 721. 97 406,59 82.07 428.69 921. 76 57.43 4,049.70 82.50 46.20 2.00 200.47 278.49 54.51 95.18 268.37 212.80 28.1. 96 10.98 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977 WARRANT NO. 38074 38075 38076 38077 38078 Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Materials Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services Xerox Computer Services, EDP Services Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services Everett H. York, Valve "C-3" $ $ AMOUNT 1,667.87 ~ 2,475.00 3,947.59 ,1,849.10 18.55 80,,476.47 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977 WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS .,,951 37952 37953 37954 37955 37956 37957 ~37958 37959 37960 ~37961 37962 37963 _....,, Aronson Machine Company, Gear Positioncr E-085 Calgon Corporation, Activated Carbon John Carollo Engineers, 0 & M Manual Pl-16 John Carollo Engineers & Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2~23 Daily Construction Service, Legal Advertisement P2-23-2 Desert Dynamics~ T-200 Winch Dodge Construction News, Legal Advertisement P2-23-2 Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16 NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL-ACTS Services Orange County Restaurant Service, Carpeting P-025 C.E. Raymond/Bartlett-Snow, Calciner Parts The Register, Legal Advertisement P2-23-2 The Suppliers, Diaphragm Pump TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF "C-4" $ $ $ AMOUNT 16,762.00 4 ,641. 74 1,898.86 185,406.05 485.05 15.00 344.25 231,064.64 12,099.64 12,907.60 7,390.02 595.08 626.46 474,236.39 554,712.86 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 37941 Smith Emery, Testing 1-14 $ 352.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 37942 Local Agency Formation Conunission, Annexation 22 Processing Fee $ 50.00 ACCUMUALTED CAPITAL OlITLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 37943 Ecos Management Criteria, EIR Carbon Canyon $ 2,300.63 37944 Clifford Forkert, Survey 2-15-1 235.00 $ 2,535.63 ~· $ 2,585.63 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 37945 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-21-2 $ 6,054.70 DISTRICT NO. S ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 37946 United States Pipe & Foundry, Pipe S-20A $ 191,974.52 ''D-1" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 37947 The Register, Legal Advertisment Annexation 60 $ 194.14 • FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS . IN FAVOR OF - 37948 Alex Dreger & Gage Tllo, Refund Permit Overpa)'lnent $ 200.00 $ 394.14 DISTRICT NO. 11 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 37949 Clifford Forkert, Survey Slater Station $ 142.66 ~ ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 37950 Daily Pilot, Legal Advertisement EIR Public Hearing $ 7.49 $ 150.15 "D-2" RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SEPTEMBER BJ 1976 -7:30 P.M. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~'ARRANT NO. ...,._, 30626 30627 30628 30629 30630 30631 30632 30633 30634 30635 .. 30636 30637 30638 "30639 30640 30641 30642 30643 30644 30645 30646 30647 30648 -1649 ~650 30651 30652 30653 30654 30655 30656 30657 30658 30659 30660 03661 30662 30663 30664 ~0665 30666 30667 30668 30669 30670 30671 30672 30673 1674 ~0675 30676 30677 Air California, Air Fare Various Meetings All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings American Controls, Valves American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals City of Anaheim, Power Artesia Implements & Parts, Tractor Blades Banning Battery Company, Batteries Barksdale Controls Division, Controls Barnes & Delaney, Water Screen Parts, Gear Parts Beckman Instruments, Instrumentation Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts Thomas G. Brisco, Employee Mileage Bristol Park Medical Group, Employee Pre-employment Exams C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair CS Company, Valve Plug Cals Cameras, Photo Processing · Castle Company, Lab Equipment Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil 1lemoval Clark Dye Hardware, Tools College Lumber Company, Building Materials Concrete Transport Equipment, Truck Rental Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Consolidated Electric Company, Controls Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Lee L. Cory, Employee Mileage Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies De Guelle & Sons Glass Company, Glass Replacement Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies Wilber Eads, Employee Mileage Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enterprise Printing Company, Office Supplies Fischer & Porter Company, Instrumentation Clifford A Forkert, Coast Highway and Oil Lease Mapping City of Fullerton, Water General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal Groth Chevrolet Company, Truck Parts L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage Harrisons & Crosfield, Chemicals Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower Carburetor Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Air Compressor Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Regulator Parts & Fittings City of Huntington Beach, Water "A-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 58.50 238.72 140.28 11,324.08 155.63 133.56 332.66 568.87 1,986.89 142.25 117 .62 32.34 39.00 480.00 103.60 8.90 249.62 312.84 80.03 220.40 231.25 237.17 729. 97 4,645.65 9.00 598.48 38.83 17.10 235.32 56.56 85.00 31.80 9.60 308.32 21.04 118. 01 1,045.10 6.13 3,398.71 33.54 783.00 281.07 22.20 2,681.80 20.56 265.00 1,253.82 743.51 518.70 674.21 701.16 22.74 "A-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 30678 30679 30680 30681 30682 30683 30684 30685 30686 30687 30688 30689 30690 30691 30692 ·30693 30694 30695 30697 30698 30699 30700 30701 30702 30703 30704 30705 30706 30707 30708 30709 30710 30711 30712 30713 30714 30715 30716 30717 30718 30719 30720 30721 30722 30723 30724 30725 30726 30727 30728 30729 30730 30731 30732 Huntington Labs, Lab Supplies International Business Machines, Office Supplies, Mtce Agreement International Harvester Company, Valve Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Mike Jones, Employee Mileage Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe & Fittings King Bearing, Inc., Bearings Knox Industrial Supplies, Lubricant L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Service Charles Meriam Company, Instrumentation Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, Chemicals & Cleaner National Lumber Supply, Building Materials Sy Nielson Service, Calibrate Balances Nolex Corporation, Specification Supplies Occidental College, Ecology Trawl Orange County Farm Supply Company, Insecticide Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp Pacific Industrial Supply, Tools Pacific Pumping Company, Pump Parker Printing Service, Inventory Count Cards Peterson Company, Buoy Maintenance RFL c/o Luscombe Engineering Company, Instrumentation Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Fittings Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies · City of Seal Beach, Water Seal Methods, Inc., Pump Packing Sepor Laboratory Supply, Lab Supplies Sherwin Williams Company, Paint & Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Singer Mailing Equipment, Postage Meter Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern California Edison, Power . South Orange Supply, Grounds Maintenance Supplies Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water Speed E Auto Parts, Bumpers Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline, Petroleum Products Starow Steel, Steel The Suppliers, Tools Surveyors Service Company, Manuals J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement Tatkin Company, Flame Arrestor Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Electric Cart Parts C. O. Thompson Petroleum, Kerosene Travel Buffs, Air Fare Various Meetings Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts Truck and Auto Supply, Truck Parts J. G. Tucker & Son, Safety Equipment "A-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 90.6~ 88.4~ 19.95 1. 75 41.22 458.09 12.60 6.17 1,626.17 48.60 1,439.78 1,647.34 132.34 , 154.60 57.39 400.00 . 14.84 1L48 146.52 1,063.18 192. 92 . 1,223.36 174.93 84.00 73.02 154. If' 195.5.,...,, 93.05 263.73 149.92 63.22 79.69 206.38 471.27 24.18 69.96 395.00 7 J 011. 99 101.59 310.16 304.33 5,684.42. 87.48 186.76 32.05 388.55 58.30 86.70 482.83 94.66 292.0C 436.52~ 719. 27 31.80 II A-211 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 3~"'33 ~.34 30735 30736 30737 30738 30739 30740 30741 30742 30743 30744 30745 30746 Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Delivery United States Elevator Corporation, Maintenance Agreement University of California Irvine, JPL Computer Model Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage Warren & Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fitting Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage Everett H. York Company, Engine Parts "A-3" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 9.96 10.05 33.00 4.00 1,965.06 41.94 27.54 13.50 3.39 621. 37 240.53 1,875.50 20.70 40.28 $ 69,141.90 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 CAPITAL OITTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. 30622 30623 30624 ·30625 John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Service, JPL John Carollo Engineers and Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2-23 Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services P2-8~8 Santa Ana Dodge, Pickup Trucks Specification A-080 Rebid TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF II A-4 II AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT '1J $ 449.78 103,792.75 1,230.00 26,076.00 $ 131,548.53 $ 200,690.43 II A-4!' INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 30611 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 1-14 $ 27,074.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30612 30613 F.W. Dodge Division of McGraw-Hill, Request for Proposals Sleepy Hollow $ Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4 99.·oo 1,605.00 ~614 30615 30616 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Nutrilite, Refund Permit Overpayment ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-20-2, 3-21-2 Smith Emery Comp~ny, Pipe Testing 3-21-2 "B-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ 1,704.00 32.50 2,346.00 208.00 $ 2,554.00 $ 2,586.50 "B-1" WARRANT NO. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30617 Newporter Inn, Refund Permit Overpayment ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30618 Simpson-Steppat, Engineering Services 5-20-A "B-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ ""1111' AMOUNT 17.50 85. 30 . $ 102.80 "B-2-" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~ WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30619 30620 30621 "C" Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way Mapping FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8 & 7-6-9 Smith Emery Company, Pipe_Testing 7-6-9 AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ AMOUNT 2,127.50 4,158.00 237.25 $ 4,395.25 $ 6,522.75 II C" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30784 30785 30786 30787 30788 30789 30790 30791 30792 30793 30794 30795 30796 30797 30798 30799 30800 30801 30802 30803 30804 30805 30806 30807 30808 30809 30810 30811 30812 30813 30814 30815 30816· 30817 30818 30819 30820 30821 30822 30823 30824 30825 30826 30827 30828 30829 30830 30831 30832 30833 30834 30835 Air California, Air Fare Various Meetings All Bearing Service, Inc., Cleaner Aljac Supply Company, Pipe Fittings American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts Ameren Corrosion Control Division, Amerplate City of Anaheim, Water The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing V. B. Anderson, Valves Audio Visual Industries, Projection Lamp Barnes & Delaney, Couplings Beckman Instruments, Electrode Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Valve Big 5 Sporting Goods, Sampling Supplies Blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuild Magtronic Building News, Inc., Constru.ction Bulletins Burke Engineering Company, Motor C & R Reconditioning Company, Machining CS Company, Valves California Auto Collision, Inc., Body Work College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa County Water District, Water County.Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Derbys Topsoil, Road Base Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Electric Balancing Company, Balance Scroll Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Services Enterprise Printing Company, Office Supplies Farr Company, Filters Fischer & Porter Company, Valve, Chlorination Parts Compressor Products Division, Resurface Valve Freeway Stores, Office Supplies Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Fuel Injectors GAF Corporation, Blueprint Machine Repair General Electric Company, Lamps General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Telephone Company Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies HMK Marketeer Limited, Electric Cart Parts .Hach Chemical Company, Inc., 'IUrbidity Kit Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Electric Supplies Harrington Industrial, Valve Hewlett Packard, Recharger House of Batteries, Battery Howard Supply Company, Valve & Regulator Parts City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Truck Rental Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardwar~ JD Packaging & Sales, Tape "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICfS $ AMO UN ,.._,, 115. 00 114 .10 96.96 43.73 4.77 69.91 775.25 101.76 29.30 270.99 445.20 156.46 28. 61 . 166.00 281.10 37.85 275.98 570.00 519.17 129.10 68.50 1,387.54 7 ,521.53 6. o'-"' 23.93 40.00 397.50 160.14 125.00 3,000.00 84.17 76.18 168.08 132.00 19.08 177.16 54. 94, 527.57 1,633.58 220.40' 195.57 101. 31 38.50 207.99 314.62 21.20 22.90 421. 35 819.6~ 466.47 497.20 324.57 "D-1" JOINT DISTRICTS Ci.AIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WA.RRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~ 30836 30837 30838 30839 30840 30841 30842 30843 30844 30845 30846 30847 30848 •30849 30850 30852 30853 30854 30855 30856 30857 30858 30859 '70860 -..-<l861 30862 30863 30864 30865 30866 30867. 30868 30869 30870 30871 30872 30873 30874 30875 30876 30877 30878 30879 30880 30881 30882 30883 30884 ~'l885 ~886 30887 30888 Keenan ·pipe & Supply Company, Couplings, Pipe Fittings King Bearing, Inc., Fittings, Bushings, Pump Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Ladders, Signs LBWS, Inc., Oxygen, Grinding Wheel, Pipe Fittings, Welding Rod L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service McFarland Partitions, Warehouse Office Partitions McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Wire, Electric Supplies Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies Metropolitan Supply Company, Air Filters Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Manual E.B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers National Chemsearch, Cleaner City of Newport Beach, Water Omniproducts of California, Building Maintenance Supplies Orange County Equipment Company, Maintenance Supplies Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts . Oxygen Service, JPL Supplies Pacific Telephone Company M C Patten Corporation, Gauge Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Ignition Rod Postmaster, Postage Harold Primrose Ice., Sampling Supplies Pylam Products Company, Sampling Supplies Rodney Hunt Company, Sampling Supplies S & A Distributing, Hardware Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Sampling Supplies Shepherd Machinery Company, Caterpillar Parts Sherwin Williams Company, Paint & Paint Supplies Sidu Manufacturing Company, Pipe Plug Sims Industrial Supply, Welding Equipment Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Company Southern California Water Company, Water Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline The Suppliers, Hardware & Tools Bruce Tay~or, Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Switch Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint & Paint Supplies Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts Truck & Auto Supply, Truck Parts, Block Repair Tustin Water Works, Water United Parcel Service, Delivery United States Equipment, Inc., Valve Channel VWR Scientific, Test Equipment, Lab Supplies John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fittings Waukesha Engine Scrvicenter, Engine Parts Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Rod "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 468.85 325.04 224.50 237.36 1,328.73 1,605.00 136.28 45.08 31.30 40.16 797.12 373.12 348.06 42.27 56.18 544.88 148.30 473.26 55.94 192.36 19.24 500.00 31.80 42.00 4,229.40 52.95 630.20 321.03 161.76 21.19 49.13 661.46 172.63 90.10 1,995.62 879.61 3.26 694.51 500.73 12.90 690.47 603.16 233.09 2,051.27 67.31 20.35 539.01 384.01 230. 80 34.27 409.08 1,376.15 "D-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30889 Wilson Engine & Equipment Company, Switch 30890 Everett H. York Company, f~se 30891 Zellar's Cycle, Bicycles "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT ~ $ 175.96 84.80 539.84 $ 49,468.13 "D-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS l""RRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ...., 30773 30774 30775 30776 30777 30778 30779 30780 30781 30782 . 30783 Aljac Supply Company, Portable Vise Bowen Engineering, Inc., Engineering Services, JPL-ACTS John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, JPL, Facilities Plan John Carollo Engineers & Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2-23 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, 9hm Meter Charles P. Crowley Company, JPL Equipment Rental Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Engineering Services EIS Facilities Plan Meyer Machinery Company, Sheet Metal Brake Pepsi Company Building Systems, JPL Office Rent Randle & West Company, JPL Equipment TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CORF "D-4" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 121.53 3,500.00 1,203.75 7,430.49 524.70 1,272.00 246.98 9,846.88 4,181.70 191.86 96.33 $ 28,616.22 $ 78,084.35 "D-4 II INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30768 County of Orange, Easement 2-14-4 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30769 Federal Mogul Arrowhead Products, Easement 3-21-2 "E" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS "" AMOUNT $ 111,605.00 $ 2 ,501. 00 . "E" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~ WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF . 30770 The Register, Bid Notice, OPA Hearing FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30771 City of Orange, Repaint Traffic Lines & Markings 7~6-8 30772 Nellie M. Reeve, Easement 7-6-9 "F" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 65.90 489.92 5,500.00 $ 5,989.92 $ 6,055.82 "F" - RESOLUTION NO. 76-149 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. J-7-3 A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION AND REMODEL, JOB NO. J-7-3 * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETE~INE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for construction of Administration-Engineering Building Addition and Remodel', Job No.·J-7-3, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized.and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., October 12, . 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. J-7-3 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. "G" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" RESOLUTION NO. 76-150 AWARDING SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCJ~SE OF THIRTY-TWO (32) DIGESTER DOME HANGERS, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the 'Boards of Directors by the Dist~icts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Production Steel Company, •Inc. for Purchase of Thirty-Two (32) Digester Dome Hangers, Specification No. PW-053, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Specification No. PW-053 be awarded to Production Steel Company, Inc. in the total amount of $15,508.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of District No. 1 acting fo~ itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(a) -ALL DISTRICTS Eng i n c er ' s Es t i ma t e $ 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 q B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T ·Date August 31, 1976 11 :00 a.m. Contract For: PURCHASE OF 32 DIGESTER DOME HANGERS SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Production Steel Co., Inc. Carson s15,508.oo 2. Duramet Fountain Valley 15,894.70 3. Hoertig Iron Works City of Industry 17,280.00 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. II I II AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "I" - ...,,,,,, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFO~NIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. ·1 ----~~~~~--~~~~ ::->NTRACTOR: BEVERLY PACIFIC CORPORATIGrJ DATE August 31, JQ76 .JB:NEW FIBERGLASS DUCTIJORK FOR HEAD\/ORKS 11 C11 FRESH AIR VFNTl!flT!DtJ svsn:n .JOB NO P\./-047 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ~~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the folloHing additions to or .~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Extend allowed time for contract completion by 35 days. Reason Contractor obtained and constructed new molds which enabled him to more easily comply with the job specifications and to produce higher quality ductwork. · Original Contract Date Original Completion Date Original Contract Time Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date January 29, 1976 July 27, 1976 180 Calendar Days 35 Calendar Days 35 Calendar Days 215 Calendar Days August 31, 1976 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price $ 29' 664. 00 $ ____ ~0_._00 __ :--~~ $ 0.00 --~~--~~~~- $ 29,664.00 ~oard authorization date: Approved: ...,,,,,, ~. :jy--------------=---~--=---Eng i nee r . . ~ .. ·' Cont rile tor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By ______ ~~-----------~:-:::----:---~ Chief Engir.ce II J II AGENDA ITEM #8(E) -ALL DISTRICTS II J II II K" RESOLUTION NO. 76-151 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-047 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-047 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Beverly Pacific Corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for NEW FIBERGLASS pUCTWORK FOR HEADWORKS "C" FRESH AIR VENTILATION SYSTEM, JOB NO. PW-047, on the 31st of August, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That New Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Venti- lation System, Job No. PW~047, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with th~ terms of the contract therefor, dated January 29, 1976; and, Section 4. That 'the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Beverly Pacific Corporation, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance ·of New-Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System, Job No. PW-047, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. TI1at the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II K" ~ --COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.·o. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FQUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. -------~-------~-~ ::~NTRACTOR: lnstrumentation/Mechanfcal Systems, Inc. DATE August 31, 1976 •. : 3 : ___ A_UT_O_M_A_T_I c_G_A_T_E_O_PE_R_A_T_O_R_S_-_D_I V_E_R_S_l_O_N_S_T_R_U_C_T_U_R_E _A_T_· _P_L_A_NT_~_rn_. __ -_J_O_B_N_O_. _P_W_-_0 __ 5_2 ____ _ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 ----~--~------ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ·1~tract work are hereby authorized and as co~pensation therefor, the follo.-1ing additions to or ~ductions from the contract price are hereby app1oved. -, Revise insurance requirements for job. Public Liability ar.d·Property Damage: One person More than one person Property damage Motor Vehicle Public Liability and Property Damage One person More than one person Property damage sPecified requirements were excessive for job of this size. 0 rig i na 11 y Specified $1,000,000 /3~000,000 500,000 200,000· 500,000 00,000 Original Contract Price $ Prev. Auth. Changes $ This Change {ADD) (DEDUCT) ·s Amended Contract Price $ Changed to $ 300,00.0 J·,000,000 100,000 ! i $ 1 .. 0· .. o.· , oov 300,000 100/,000 ·"/ 22,688.00 0. 00. 0.00 22,688.00 ~:xird authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California Assoc i a t e Eng i n cc r ·.• By ________ ~~-----~~-:--::-".=---:-- Ch i cf Engine~ Contrilctor "L" AGENDA ITEM #8(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II L" "M" RESOLUTION NO. 76-152 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-9-2 AS CO~lPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-9-2 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, F. T. Ziebarth Company, has completed the project in accordance with the terms of the contract for AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS, DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-052, on the 31st of August, 1976; 'and, Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated February 26, 1976; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with F. T. Ziebarth Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on '"-"" behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED 3t a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II M" II NII RESOLUTION NO. 76-153 AMENDING RESOLlITION NO. 75-167 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 75-167, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, is hereby further amended to adjust the salary range for the following position classifi- cation: EXHIBIT II B-3" SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL Position Range Classification Classification No. Hourly 90080 Chief of Industrial 62 $9.39/11.69 Waste Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary $1,627/2,027 Section 2. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 3. That this resolution shall become effective September 10, 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -ALL DISTRICTS II N" RESOLUTION NO. 76-154 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-167 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION NO. 75-167, AS AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts. Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, is hereby further amended to add pGsition classifications thereto, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-2" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Range Positions Personnel Classification Position Classification No. Hourly Approxim~ Monthly Equivalent Salary II O" 1 1 1 0 10500 10840 Administrative Aide Clerk 647C 4.87/5.92 $844/1026 4.40/hr max Section 2. That Resolution No. 75-167,_as amended, is hereby further amended by the addition of Exhibit "C", dated September, 1976; and, Section 4. That Exhibit "C" dated July, 1976, is hereby rescinded; and, Section S. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 6. That this resolution shall become effective September 10, 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(0) -ALL DISTRICTS II O" II P" RESOLUTION NO. 76-165-2 APPHOVING AGHIDll'.NT f<E r1mn1ASF. Mm SALE OF EN~r~tENTS AN0-t\-U:1i1il1f1 ii ~l;-·Ace 1:·1·r,\.:--;i :·1:"· ffF-1:-.\~; 1:~1·1 :-~-rr~c;-f:ifo~ITI\ Nt.s-;-r"A. BR\'A: .. fr-.-Jlf.-.-lrAT.:"':-j{·L-·LUNTRAC°Y!r r;us-. -2-:-f:f::r"1-2-:-r:r:5 A RESOLUTION OF TllE BOAHD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORA~GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROV H~r. AGREH!ENT FOR PUHCHASE A.'-;0 SALE OF TOIPORARY A.'m PER.'-l . -NT U~DERCRou:-.;o EASE~IENTS. A."\O AUTI IOR IZ I ~~G ACCEPTAi'\LL OF GRANTS OF EASEMENT FIW~f ERNEST A. BRYANT• JR., ET AL. IN CONNECT.ION WITH CONTRACTS NOS. 2-14-4 AND 2-14-5 • • • • * • * • * * ~ * * Tile Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE A.'\D ORDER: Section 1. That Agreement re Purchase and Sale of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easements dated August 2, 1976, by and between Ernest A. Bryant, Jr., et al. and County Sanitation District No. 2, relative to acquisition of easements in connection with construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts 2-14-4 and 2-14-5, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager is hereby ~uthorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That those certain Grants of Easement dated ~~~~~~~~- wherein easementsin the vicinity of the Santa Ana River and Weir Canyon for sanitary sewer purposes are granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, are hereby accepted from Ernest A. Bryant, Jr., ct al.; and, Section 4. That the real property over which said easements are gra~ted are more particularly described and sh0\,11 on Exhibits "A" and "B", .attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That said easements are granted in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-S; and, Section 6. That payment, pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned purchase and sale agreement, is hereby authorized in the following amounts: Permanent Easements Temporary Easements Damaged/Removed Citrus Trees $14,550.00 13,500.00 13,980.00 $42,030.00 Section 7. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be author1ied and directed to record said casements in the Official Records of Orange County, California, as provided in the purchase and sale agreement. PASSED AND AflOPTED at a rcr,ular meeting held September S, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8Cr) -DISTRICT 2 II P" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER 7 C.O. NO·------------------~,_~ ~-CONTRACTOR: KASLER CORPORAT I Otl & L. H. \JOODS & SONS, I UC. OATE ___ .... A .... u ...... g.-.us.._t.__3._.1_._..._1"""'9,,_76.._ ___ _ JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5. CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (at?'OU'~ $ 1,423.82 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or · contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or --deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Lowry & Associates letter dated 12-17-75 and Yorba Linda County Water District letter dated 2-2-76 -Letter from-Kasler-Woods dated 6-15-76 and the Districts letter dated 6-24-76. A. ADD: Water Utility interference at Station 850+70 $1 , 423. 82 B. ADD: Relocate the following manholes: Existing Station 891+50.00 902+50.00 924+50.00 New Station 891+98.00 904+93.78 927+70.oo No cost for this change order. All costs will be paid ·On the same unit price as stated in the contract. Any deviations will be taken care of in the adjustment of quantities at the end of the p~oject. C. ADD: Manhole at Station 920+43.46 Costs for this manhole will be at unit price and paid for in Item 22 of the contract and billed to Yorba Linda County Water District. This will be reflected in the adjustment of quanities at the end of the contract. No time extension with this change order. Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 By ------------------------------------Consulting Engineer By ------------------------------------Contractor Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 74,295.70. This Change (ADD) (~~~~~~) $ 1,423.82 Amended Contract Price $ 4,316676.52 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, ~alifornia By ------------------------~--~~ Chief Enginee "Q" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q) -DISTRICT 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. 8 -----------------------CONTRACTOR: KASLER CORPORATION & L. H. WOODS & SONS, I NC. DATE August 31. 1976 ---------------------------~ JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT 2-14-4 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ $8,320.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Kaster-Woods letters of 1-9-76 and 2-9-76 and the Districts letter of 2-19-76 to Kasler-Woods. For delays sustained by the District's Contractor resulting in the necessity to reschedule construction of the contract work for the Yorba Regional Park. The District's Contractor was directed to reschedule his work.and to proceed in accordance with the instructions from the County on the. basis of the County's construction scheduJe of the park. ·The District's Contractor sustained additional costs in the d~lays which resulted in additional equipment rental costs. COST: Total additional cost $8,320.00 No additional time extension with this change order. Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 75,719.52 This Change (ADD) ( Bgrrn~t) $ 8,320.00 Amended Contract Price $ 4,324,996.52 Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved: ~ -By------------------------~~-----------Con s ult in g Engineer By __________________________________ ___ Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By ____________________ ~~---~--- C hi cf Enginec II Rll AGEMDA ITEM #8(R) -.DISTRICT 2 II Rll -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE. fQUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 9 ------------------!'4TRACTOR: KASLER CORPORATION & L·. H. WOODS & SONS, INC. 0 ATE August 31, 1976 :-3: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 Amount of th ts Change Order {ADD) (OOOOOT) $ 6,808.01 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ~~tract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~ductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: : Kalser-Woods letter and invoice of 8/18/76 and Districts letter of 8/24/76. FOR: Additional wo~k necessitated during boring operations at the intersection of COST: La Palma and Imperial Stat.ion 842+12 caused by existing 8 11 sewer being other than as shown on the plans. Total Add: $6,808.01 No additional time extension with this ·change order. Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00 .· Prev. Auth. Changes $ __ ..... s~_,_o....,3 9_.-':'."5_2 __ :.=-oard authorization date: September 8, 1976 v ---------------~--~--~~------~~ Consulting Engineer .. -y _________________ _ Contractor This Change (ADD) (~B3~«l) $ 6,808.0l ----------~~--~ Amended Contract Price $ 4,331 ,804.53 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By----------~----~--~~~ Chief Engint "S" AGENDA ITEM #SCs) -DISTRICT 2 "S" . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE ~ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER ~ C.O. N0. ___ 1~0~------~------~ .-7RACTOR: KASLER CORPORATION & L. H. \.IOODS & SONS, INC. DATE August 31, 1976 • SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-:14-4 Amount of thl s Change Order (~~) (DEDUCT) } (2,953.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ·:ract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~c·tions from the contract price are here.by_ appr9ved. Adjustment of Quantities: ADD: Change in Quantity I teinll Unit From to Difference at Total 22 V.F. 148 175 27* 204. 00/v. f. $5,508.oo 23 . V. F. 44 45'. 5 1.° 5 226.00/v.f . 339.00 24 V. F. 487 487.4.· o.4 200. 00/v. f. 80.00 25 C;Y. 17 25 8 90.00/c.y. 720.00 26 each 18 23 5 1,500.00/ea. 7,500.00 TOTAL ADD $14, 147 .00 D~UCT: 30 L. F. 171 0 171. 100.00/L.F. $17, 100.00 TOTAL DEDUCT ($17, 100.00) *21 feet of this to be billed to the Yorba Linda County Water District. The remaining 6 feet was necessary for the bringing of these MHs to proper grade. · TOTAL DEDUCT ($2,953.00) Original Contract Price $ 4.240.957.00 Prev; Auth. Chang·es $ 90,847.53 - This Change ~~ (DE DUCT) $ (2,953.00) Amended Contract Price $ 4,328,851.53 ~ard authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved: ,• "T" Consulting Engineer Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By----------~-----------:--=-----~--Ch i e f Eng i net: AGENDA ITEM #8Cr) -DISTRICT 2 -"T" II U" RESOLUTION NO. 76-166-2 ACCEPT! NG CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., J.V., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH S, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4, on the 31st of August, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have I recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred. in said engineer's .recommendation, which said recommendation is.hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Santa Ana Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated October 15, 1975; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., J.V., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said Santa Ana Interceptor, Reach S, Contract No. 2-14-4, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. 111at the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hercb~ authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8; 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(u) -DISTRICT 2 II U" "V-1" FORMAL PROTCST AND CLAIM TO: Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ·No. 2 P • 0 • Box 812 7 Fountain Valley, California 92708 RE: Formal Protest and Claim of Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., regarding Sanitation District No. 2, Contract No. 2-16-2 Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. hereby and herewith formally protests, pursuant to Section 8-4 of the Standard Specifications of the above specified contract, the decision of the Chief Engineer of Orange County Sanitation District No. 2, made in his letter of August il, 1976,· denying Claimant's claim under the contract for $67,960.85. In addition, formal claim is hereby made for said sum of $67,960.85 from Orange County Sanitation District No. 2. By reason of the facts herein particularly set forth in detail, Claimant alleges and sets forth its claims as follows: A. The name of the Claimant is Vida Artukovich & Son, Inc., a Class "A" general contract.or, whose address is 11155 Rush Street, South El Monte, Califor- nia. B. For purposes of correspondence in connection with this for~al protest and claim, Claimant requests that it be addressed in care of its attorneys, Patrick J. Duffy, Esq., Monteleone & McCrory, 5900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2900, Los Angeles, California 90036. c. The circumstances of Claimant's claim are as follows: AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(l) DISTRICT 2 "V-1" "V-2" -2- Protest and Claim One 1. In late 1975, Orange County Sanitation Dis- trict No. 2 (hereinafter "District") advertised for bids to be received from qualified contractors to construct a sewer project known as the "Yorba Linda Force Main~ pursuant to plans and specifications prepared by the said District and pursuant to public competitive bidding. 2. Claimant Vida Artukovich & Son, Inc. (herein- after "Claimant"), which was then and has been at all times since, a Class "A" contractor so licensed by the State of California, entered its sealed bid on the bid date of January 6, 1976 to perform the work in strict accordance with plans and specifications of the District. 3. Claimant was found to be the lowest respon- sible bidder and under date of January 29, 1976, Claimant and the District entered into a written contract, No. 2-16-2, for the construction of the said Yorba Linda Force Main between Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard pursuant to the said plans and specifications. 4. Thereafter, Claimant was given a "Notice To Proceed" under the contract and timely began the work. While excavating in the area of contract station 21+50 on March 9, 1976, Clairaant encountered in its trench an 87 inch storm drain and other utility services which were incorrectly located on the plans and which were shown on the plans to be outside of Claimant's work area when in fact they were directly in the way. S. The interfering utilities made it impossible for Claimant to proceed further in that area. Claimant there- upon promptly notified the District in writing of the 87 inch AGENDA ITEM #8Cv)(l) -DISTRICT 2 •. "V-3" -3- storm drain and other utilities obstructing the work right- of-way and requested the District expeditiously solve the problem and inform Claimant what was to be done. 6. In order to minimize its damages and expedite the project, Claimant moved its forces to other parts of the project on several occasions between March 9, 1976 and May 13, 1976 to complete other contract work while the District pre- pared its redesign and change order for the area at station 21+50. These attempts were made more difficult by the fail- ure of the District to obtain in a timely manner, permits and right-of-way clearances from the State Department of Transportation as required of it by the contract. 7. By May 13, 1976, Claimant had performed all work it could perform on the project until the redesign in the area of station 21+50 which the District orally pro- mised would be soon forthcoming. 8. Between May 3, 1976 and June 25,.1976, Claim- ant stood by ready to promptly perform the change order work at a cost to it of $67,960.85 as detailed by the invoices sent to the District, numbers 50-11, 50-12, 50-13, ,qnd 50-15, which are attached hereto as Exhibits "A", "B", "C", and "D", respectively, and incorporated herein by reference. 9. On July 1, .~976, the District finally completed its redesign and issued Change Order No. 1 for the extra work. Pursuant to its work under Change Order No. 1, Claimant has earned $67,960.85 above the amount authorized by said Change Order and the same is now due and owing to Clainant. 10. Claimant has lodged all required protests to the refusal of the District to pay the above sum and has AGENDA ITEM #8Cv)(l) -DISTRICT 2 ' ' "V-3!'. "V-4" -4- performed all the terms and conditions on its part so far to be performed by it under said contract. Protest and Claim Two 11. Claimant hereby refers to and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation and paragraph of its Protest and Claim One as if set forth in full herein. 12. On May 14, 1976, the District ordered in writing the above project to be shut-down for the refusal .of Claimant to perform extra work not required of it under the contract without a Change Order and without payment as a volunteer. Said order was a breach of contract, but was obeyed by Clair.1ant inaspl;ich as there was no work for it to perform anyway. Said project remained idle under the shut- down order until on or about June 25, 1976 when the same was rescinded. 13. The said shut-down order was a pure artifice and device of the District to try to avoid the substantial costs the District knew it would incur under the planned Change Order No. 1 for Claimant's stand-by time. At said time the District knew they were not yet ready with their redesign of the area at station 21+50 and would not be ready for a substantial period of time. 14. As a proximate result of said stop work order and the underlying failure of the District to effect its re- design until July 1, 1976, Claimant has bee.n· damaged in the sum of $67,960.85 and the same is due and owing from the District. Third Protest and Claim 15. Claimant hereby refers to and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation and paragraph of AGENDA ITEM #8Cv)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "V-4" "V-5" -s- its Protest and Claim One as if set forth in full herein. 16. As a matter of law the District impliedly warranted in the contract that they had obtained all neces- sary work rights-of-way and that their plans did not contain such egregious errors as would result in substantial delays of the project completion and that any errors would be cor- rected expeditiously so as not to delay the work. 17. The District breached said warranty by failing to provide right-of-way, by having defective plans and by _failing to correct defects in a timely manner. 18. As a ~roximate result of such breach, Claim- ant has been d_amaged in the su~ of $67,960.85 and the same is due from the District. Fourth Protest and Claim 19. Claimant hereby refers to and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation and paragraph of its Protest and Claim One as if set forth in full herein. 20. Government Code Section 4215 provides as follows: "In any contract to which a public agency as.defined in Section 4401 i~ a party, the public agency shall assume the responsibility, between the parties to the contract, for the removal, relocation, or protection of existing utilities located on the site of any construction project that is a subject of the contract, if such utilities are not identified by the public agency in the plans and specifications made a part of the invitation for bids. The contract documents shall include provisions that the contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay ·in AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "V-5" •. "V-6" -6- completion of the project, when such delay was caused by the failure of the public agency or the owner of the utility to provide for removal or relocation of the existing utility facilities. •Nothing herein shall preclude the public agency from pursuing any appropriate renedy against the utility for delays which are the responsibility of the utility. "Nothing herein shall be construed to relieve the utility from any obligation as required either by law or by contract to pay the cost of removal or reloca- tion of ~xisting utility facilities. "If the contractor while performing the con- tract discovers utility facilities not identified by the public agency in the contract plans or specif i- cations, he shall immediately notify the public agency in writing." 21. Pursuant to Government Code Section 4215, Claimant is owed the sum of $67,960.85 from the District. D. Conclusion. Claimant requests that the denial of the Chief Engineer of $67,960.85 be reversed by this Board and said sum paid ~o Claimant within forty- five (45) days hereof in accord with Section 8.4 of the District's Standard Specifications. DATED: August 20, 1976. MONTELEONE & McCRORY AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "V-6 ': COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE: 714 540·2910 962-2411 P. 0. SOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Vido Artukovich & Son 11155 Rush A~gust 11, 1976 South El Monte, California 91733 Attention: Mr. Anthony Artukovich Subject: Yorba Linda Foice Main -tontract No. 2-16-2 This office is in receipt of a letter signed on your behalf by Mr. Patrick J. Duffy of Monteleone & McCrory, who indicated in his letter of August 9th, that they represent you in the matter of disputed extra work claimed by you regarding the above- mentioned contract. As engineer for the Districts, as set forth in Section 1-2 of the Standard Specifications for this contract, I have reviewed your demand and am hereby advising you that your claim for standby costs in the amount of $67,960.85 is denied. This denial is hereby binding on this contract· unless, within ten days of the date of this letter, you shall file a formal protest through the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. Pursuant to Section 8-4 of said Standard Specifications, you are hereby informed that if you do file a formal protest against the engineer's decision, the Board of Directors shall consider and render a formai decision within 45 days of receipt of same. REL:hje cc: Thomas L. Woodruff Patrick J. Duffy REGISTERED MAIL "W" AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "W" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. ________________ __ :.ONTRACTOR: George Mi 1 ler Construct jon Comoaoy DATE August 23 1976 ~~B: ___ M_a~n~h_o_l~e~R~e~p~la~c~e~m~e~n~t •• _L~o-s;.....;..A_l~a-m~i~to~s;;;....;S~u-b_-_r~r-u_nk_.~c~o~n~t-r~ac~t.-.:.~~lo~.__..3_-~8R~--1..._ ______________________ _ Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ·=ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Due to availability and delivery of materials, the fol lowing time adjustment is required: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 .. By------------------------~-----------Consu 1 ting Engineer --By ________________________________ __ Contractor May 26, 1976 30 Ca 1 enda r Days June 25, 1976 68 Ca 1 enda r Days 0 Calendar Days 98 Ca 1 enda r Days August 31, 1976 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Chcmges Thts Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 14,999.00 $ o. 00 $ 0.00 $ 14,999.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Orange County, California ., OF By ______ --------------------~--~ Chief Engince "X" AGENDA ITEM #8Cw) DISTRICT 3 "XII "Y" RESOLUTION NO. 76-167-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-1 AS COMPLETE A~D APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has completed the project in accordance with the terms of the contract for MANHOLE ,REPLACEMENT, LOS ALAMITOS SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-1, on the 31st of August, 1976; and, Section 2. Th.at by letter, the District's Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos ·sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated May 26, 1976; and, Section 4. That· the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. Th.at the Final Closeout Agreement with George Miller Construction Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for a~ceptance of Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(x) ·-DISTRICT 3 "Y" ~UUNIY ~ANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER =ONTRACTOR: U.S. PIPE AND FOUUDBY CO. C.O. NO·~----~~~~~­ DATE August 18, 1976 _:QB: BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER -COtHRACT NO, 5-20A (MATER I AL PURCHASE ONLY) Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~~iurnx) $ 23.980.57 In accordance with contract provisions, the following ·changes in the contract and/or =ontracf work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or .=eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ~ ln~rease from 8,600 L.F. to 9,620 L.F. or 1 ,020 L.F. of 24 11 Class 50 ductile iron pipe with bel I and spigot ends and push-on joints including polyethylene encasement. 1,020 L.F~@ $20.46/L.F. = $20,869.20 Add three (3) 24 11 x 24 11 x 8 11 bell x bel 1 x flange tees including bl ind flange and bolts. Three (3) @ $632.33 = $1,896~99 Add t\'/O (2) 24 11 x 24 11 x 611 bel 1 x bel 1 x flange tees including bl ind flange and bolts. Two (2) @ $607.19 = $1,214.38 TOTALS: 1 , 020 L. F. of 24 11 duet i 1 e i ran pipe 3 24 11 x 24 11 x 8 11 tees = '$20,869.20 = 1,896.99 2 -24" x 24 11 x 611 tees = 1 , 21-4. 38 $23,980.57 There Will be no time adjustment made. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Chang.es This Change (ADD) (Sfg~MKI) Amended Contract Price ::oard authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved: $ 184.754.25 $ 0.00 $ 23,980.57 $ 208,734.82 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California ¥--~~~~--~--~~~~~~--~~~ Consulting Engineer y----~--~------~--------~--~---- By--------------------~~:--::~-:----C hie f Enginee Contractor. "Z" AGENDA ITEM #8(z) -DISTRICT 5 "Z" ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FQUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER c.o. NO. 2 -~ONTRACTO~ U.S. Pipe and Foundrv Company DATE Augy st 31, 1976 -JB: BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER -CONTRACT 5-20A (MATER I AL PURCHASE ONLY) Amount of this Change Order (ADD) C~f j)~£x) $ 304.05 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or =ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Adjustment of Quantities: Increase from 2 to 3, or add 1, 24 11 45° bend with bell and spigot ends and push-on joints. 1 @ $304.05 = $304.05 ,. Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 try' ------------------~---=--:-----==--~--Cons u 1 ting Engineer By..-----------------------------------Contractor Original Contract Price $ 184,754.25 Prev. Auth. Chan~es $ 23,980.57 This Change (ADD) (DE DUCT) $ _ __..3_0_4 _. 0~5. __ _ Amended Contract Price $ 209,038.87 Approved: COUNTY SAN I TAT I ON D t STRI CTS 0 F Orange County, California By ____________________ ~__,,~~--- Ch i e f Enginee II AA II AGENDA ITEf1i #8(AA) -DISTRICT 5 ".4A II "BB" August 20, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 Gentlemen: Presented herewith for your Honorable Body to consider is our petition to annex Tract No. 9072 to the County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County. A metes and bounds description is enclosed as Exhibit 11 A11 and a map attached as Exhibit 11 811 • I hereby agree to pay the Annexation Acreage -Fees and processing costs as necessary. I have enclosed a check for $325. 00 to cover processing costs. I also certify that the territory to be annexed contains 10.04 acres and the land contains no inhabitants. I also certify that according to the last Tax Assessor's Rolls, the property shown hereon as Tract No. 9072 was A.P. #93-421-07, 08, with a total assessed valuation of $42,160. Very truly yours, HILLCREST VILLAGE, A Limited Partnership BY: I P S, A General Partnership r. • /·. ·;~---' l .,.-- ...-I "' V""~ By : --..-.::. ~ ~· :.4.-' I /. . .,. /, David M. Stone, General Partner AGENDA ITEM #3(FF) -DISTRICT 7 "BB II "-""' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOµNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO·----------~----------- : :lNTRACTOR: SULLY-HILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY DATE _______ A~ll~G~US~T...._3~0~~·---19~7~6.__ _______ __ ~S: TUSTIN ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 & 16. Contract 7-6-9 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DfDXIrf) $ $15 ! 3 27. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or --~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. A .• For backfill having a sand equivalent of 20 as provided for in Section 116-3 of the ·oetailed Specifications from Station 287+76 to Station 324+30. B. . 3 3 3854 ft. of trench for 1142 yd at $8.00/yd = $9, 136.00 (Price stipulated in bid item (c) ) . For replacement of roadway on Reeve· property. of the existing but not the replacement. The obtaining the right-of-way. The contract called for the removal replacement is a requirement for Grading, 411 aggregate ~ase, 211 asphaltic concrete at $0.89/ft 2 520 x 13 = 6760 ft 6760 ft 2 at $0.89ft 2 = $6,016.40 For signs, barricades· and paddles L.S. = $174.60 to reduce liability TOTAL ADD: $15,327.00 No Time Extension is required. Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 B~------------------~----------------Consulting Engineer By __________________________________ __ Contractor Original Contract Price $ 295. 826. 40 Prev. Auth. Chan~es $ ____ __.;o~·~o~o~------ This Change (ADD) ~ $ 15,32?.00 Amended Contract Price $ 3 11 ' 1 53. 40 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County,.California By--------------------------~-----C hie f Engineer "CC" AGENDA ITEM #8(GG) -DISTRICT 7-II cc II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 E~LIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ___ 2 ______________ _ . .JNTRACTOR: SULLY-Ml LLER CONTRACT I NG COMPANY DATE AUGUST 30, 1976 ~ :>B: TUSTIN ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 and REACHES 15 & 16, Contract 7-6-9 Amount of this Change Order (~~ (DEDUCT) $ $425 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ~~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Adjustment of Quantities: Change Estimated Quantities: · Oeduc t Item# 12 Unit ea. c.y. From 2 10 . No Time Extension is required noard authorization date: September 8, 1976 ay ----------------------------------Consulting Engineer . By ________________________________ __ Contractor To Di ff. 7 3 TOTAL DEDUCT: @ $220.00 68.60 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (~D) (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: Total $220.00 . 205.80 $425.80 $ 295,826.40 $ 1 5' 3 27. 00 . s __ (_42_5_. a_o ) __ _ $ 310,727.60 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, ·California By _____________________________ __ Chief Enginee1 "DD" AGENDA ITEM #8(HH)-bISTRICT 7 "DD II • "EE" RESOLUTION NO. 76-173-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF l~E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 111at the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has completed the construction in acco.rdance with the terms of the contract for Tustin- Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, on the 31st of August, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated April 29, 1976; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Sully-Miller Contracting Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGEMDA ITEM #8(11) -DISTRICT 7 "EE" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. · 0 • B 0 X 8 1 2 7 -· 1 0 8 4 4 ELL I S AVENUE FO~NTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. ------------------------1NTRACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV DATE August 26, 1076 JS: ·MANHOLE REPLACEP.ENT AND REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK COtURACI NO J J-JR-1 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ____ a~a_a~--~------- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ~ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follo.-1ing additions to or .~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Adjustment of quantities: De 1 e te I tern ·15. .· A"time extension due to delay in receiving encroachment permit f.rom Ca 1 trans. Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date March 25, 1976 120 Calendar Days July 23, 1976 39 Calendar Days 39 Calendar Days 159 Calendar Days August 31, 1976 Original Contract Price $ 37,253.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ (1, 140.00) This Change (ADO) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 ---------------- Amended Contract Price $ 36,113.00 Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved: By __________________________________ __ Contractor COUNTY SANITATION D ! STR I CTS 0 F Orange County,. California By--------------------------~-----Ch i e f Enginee! "FF" AGENDA ITEM #8(JJ) -·DISTRICT 11 II FF II RESOLUTION NO. 76-174-11 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUN1Y, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Rewes-Schock, JV, has completed the project in accordance with the terms of the contract for MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1, on the 31st of August, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the District's Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; ..._, and, Section 3. That Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance ~ith the terms of the contract therefor, dated March 25, 1976; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Rewes-Schock, JV, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-1, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 19.76. "GG" AGENDA ITEM #8(KK) -DISTRICT 11 "GG" RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHINGUSE CHARGES FOR CLASS I AND CLASS I I PERMITEES FOR TI1E 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. * * * ~ * * * * * * * WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has hcretofor adopted Ordinance No. __ , an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities; and,· WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall annually adopt a charge for use of District facilities by Class I and Class II permitees. NOW, 11IEREFOR: The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That, pursuant to Section 302.6 of Ordinance No. __ , the 1976-77 fiscal year charge for use for Class I permitees is hereby established as follows: For Flow: $ per million gallons of flow ---- For Biochemical Oxygen Demand: $ per thousand pounds of B.O.D. ---- For Suspended Solids: $ per thousand pounds of S.S. ---- Section 2. That, pursuant to Section 303.1 of Ordinance No. __ , the 1976-77 fiscal year charge for use for Class II permitees is hereby established as follows: For Flow: $ per million gallons of flow ---- PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September B, 1976. "HH" AGENDA ITEM #8 -EACH DISTRICT "HH" "II-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108""4 ELLIS AVCNUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 '4) 5'40-2910 STAFF REPORT VALUE ENGINEERING STUDY PLAN FOR 75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 (Grant No. C-06-1073-020) (Project No. P2-23} August 31, 1976 AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS (71 '4) 962-2'4 I l "II-1" II I I -2" I. SCOPE It is proposed that the value engineering effort on the 75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 be phased to include two analyses; the first to evaluate the major equipment and processes, and the second to evaluate construction, operation and maintenance. These phases will be evaluated separately at different time intervals during the design phase and will include two value engineering teams. The two value engineering teams will be comprised of different individuals and the value engineering team coordinators will be from different consulting firms. The Phase 1 analysis will include the evaluation of the major equipment and the unit processes. This involves the oxygen facilities, pump station, electrical buildings, aeration facilities, sedimentation basins, digester cleaning area, and miscellaneous support facilities. Phase 1 work should begin immediately, and it is anticipated that Consoer, Townsend and Associates will be retained to do the analysis. Consoer, Townsend and Associates was originally submitted to the Boards of Directors of the Sanitation Districts, along with John Carollo Engineers and Greeley and Hansen in consideration for the award of the design contract for the 75-MGD of Improved Treatment. It is felt that Consoer, Townsend and Associates has fulfilled the qualification requirements of both the Sanitation Districts and the State and Environmental Protection Agency to perform this Phase 1 value engineering analysis. The Phase 2 analysis will include the evaluation of the proposed construction scheduling and techniques, and a thorough review with respect to operation and maintenance. Phase 2 work will begin in mid-October, 1976 and Mr. Gordon Culp of Clean Water Consultants will be retained to be the value engineering team coordinator. The main effort of the evaluation will be from the Sanitation Districts' staff, however. ""'-" . AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "II-2" "II-3" II. VALUE ENGINEERING TEAM AND QUALIFICATIONS The Phase 1 value engineering analysis will be performed by the staff of Consoer, Townsend and Associates. The value engineering team coordinator will be Mr. Frederick N. Van Kirk who has had training with EPA. In addition, there will be four others who have completed the required forty hour course. Two of those are Mr. Dick Foss, who completed the course at Berkeley and Mr. Neil Chin, who completed the course at Wisconsin University. Consoer, Townsend and Associates are presently involved in value engineering analysis of the treatment facilities in Indianapolis, Indiana. First the Belmont Plant, which is an existing 125-MGD secondary plant being upgraded through fixed film roughing towers, nitrification using cryogenic oxygen, clarifi- cation, mixed media filters and ozonation. And, secondly, the Southport Plant, which is an existing 60-MGD secondary plant which will be upgraded to provide advanced waste treatment for 125-MGD. Additional staff work will be performed by the San Jose office of Consoer, Townsend and Associates and will be comprised of engineers of all disciplines required for the value engineering analysis. Mr. William Fox, Operational Engineer, will be providing input for the Sanitation Districts. The Phase II value engineering analysis will be.coordinated by Mr. Gordon Culp of Clean Water Consultants, who is a certified value specialist. Input will be provided by the following individuals: 1. W. W. Hoagland, Contractor over 40 years, 20 years experience, Registered Civil Engineer (C5233). Present project manager on Districts' Job Pl-16. 2. Mark Butier, Contract Superintendent, 20 years experience, Registered Civil Engineer (Cl2622). 3. Donald Bogart, PE, (Sanitation Districts' staff). 4. Wendell Brooke, Associate Engineer (Sanitation Districts' staff). 5. Ted Francis, Senior Engineering Associate (Sanitation Districts' staff). 6. Roy Pendergraft, Senior Facilities Supervisor (Sanitation Districts' staff). AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL· DISTRICTS "Il-3" "11-4" III. ANALYSIS PLAN The value analysis of the design of the 75-MGD of Improved Treatment will be two phased with multiple teams and review sessions. Phase 1 will begin as soon as authorizatio,n is granted and Phase 2 in mid-October, 1976. The Phase 1 value engineering analysis will include the evaluation of the major equipment and the unit processes. John Carollo Engineers, the design engineers, have been preparing design memos for each phase of the project. This includes the electrical facilities, pump stations, oxygen facilities, aeration facilities, sedimentation basins, sludge thickeners, digester cleaning area, and miscellaneous support facilities. Consoer, Townsend and Associates will initially become familiar with the existing joint treatment works and the proposed 75-MGD of Improved Treatment. The site will be visited by key value engineering team members and through meetings with the Sanitation Districts' staff and John Carollo Engineers, will become knowledgeable of the design and implementation of the Sanitation Districts' facilities. The value engineering teams will examine all of the documents and design memos relating to the 75-MGD of Improved Treatment and through interdisciplinary staff support will evaluate the design considerations. Alternative approaches will be investigated and where desirable, recommendations for design alternatives will be made. The Phase 2 value engineering analysis will include the evaluation of the construction techniques and scheduling, a thorough review of operations and manpower requirements, and an in-depth investigation of the project with respect to on-going maintenance. Clean Water Consultants will be the value engineering team coordinator for the Phase 2 evaluation and the Sanitation Districts' staff and project management team will provide the evaluative support. It is felt that, with the combination of many years experience in construction and operations, that the Sanitation Districts' personnel can best make the above analysis with coordination by Clean Water Consultants. AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "II-4" ::: --I \J1 --VI. ::z::. Q rr1 ::z t:::J > ---; rr1 3 ~ ~ ~ ,,...... ):> ...._,,. J> I I t:::1 -(/) --; ::::0 -CJ --; (/) -... --I ~ ( VALUE ENGINEERING SCHEDULE Subject/Month Design-Carollo' Engrs. 10% Submittal overall 50% Submittal overall Final submittal Value Engineering Board of Directors' approval Phase 1-Consoer,Townsend Preliminary report Final Report Phase 2-Clean Water Consultants Preliminary Report Final Report Construction Flood Wall & Site Work (1073-04) Oxygen Equipment (1073-05) Electrical (1073-06) Major Facilities (1073-07) ( ( 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 i 4 22 I I .-I I I • I I I I l I 1 \ 1, 8 J 8 ~ I l ' l I 1? 10 1 AWARD I ATA 8 12 IATA I AWARD 1 TATA ( AWARD II JJ II RESOLUTION NO. 76-175 AlJ'll IOR I ZING NEGOTI ATl O~ AND AWARD OF VALUE ENGINEERING CONTJfi\(:-·17J{C-75NGo ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SAN IT A TI ON DISTRICTS NOS . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TIIE SELECTION cmtMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT TO PROVIDE VALUE ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONJUNCTION WIIB DESIGN OF 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 PURSUANT TO ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES AND AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO AWARD SAID CONTRACT * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, have heretofor adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, 1~1EREAS, pursuant to said procedures, engineering proposals have been solicited to provide value engineering services in conjunction with design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. NOW, 11-IEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, ~ 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Selection Committee established pursuant to Districts' procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services, is hereby authorized to negotiate an agreement with Consoer Townsend & Associates to provide value engineering services in conjunction with design of 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2; and, Section 2. That upon certification of the final negotiated fee for said services, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award a contract for said services; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No, 1 are herehy authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #ll(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "JJ" II KK" RESOLUTION NO. 76-163 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 1-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI- TATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER, FROM SUNFLOWER AVENUE TO MYRTLE STREET, CONTRACT NO. 1-14 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers, for construction of Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, From Sunflower Avenue to Myrtle Street, Contract No. 1-14, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., October 5, 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Contract No. 1-14 on behalf of itself and District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #13(n) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 -II KK" STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THC RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor ·-·-------------·-~------·- STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY P. o. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95801 (916) lw5-7971 .AUG 2 5 1976 Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 97208 In Reply Ref er to: 510:BS CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, PROJECT NO. C-06-1373, PLAN OF STUDY APPROVAL This office has reviewed the Plan of Study, dated June 28, 1976, for the subject project. The Division of Water Quality, with the concurrence of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board hereby approves the Plan of Study, specifically: 1. Study Area and Identification of the Entity or Entities that will be Involved in Conducting the Planning. This project will serve the drainage area of Carbon Canyon as delineated on the submitted map. The sewering agencies within the study area are County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, the City of Brea, and Chino Basin Municipal Water District. 2. Water Quality Problem or Sewerage Facilities Needs. "LL-1" (1) Failing septic systems and the constraint of geological characteristics which prohibit the successful treatment of additional wastes by septic systems. (2) Poorly operating oxidation ponds and spray irrigation system serving the City of Brea which result in poor effluent quality. (3) Poorly operating treatment facility serving the Western Hills Golf and Country Club which results in poor effluent quality. (4) Non-compliance with Basin Plan total dissolved solids concentration for discharge to ground water. AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) DISTRICT 2 "LL-1" Mr. Ray tewis -2- Project No. C-06-1373 3. Treatment, Disposal or Project Alternatives to be Considered. (1) Construction of an interceptor sewer to convey raw waste from the upper area of Carbon Canyon down Carbon Canyon Creek for treatment at the OCSD No. 1 treatment plant and subsequent dis- posal. (2) Local treatment plants to serve each development and community with the construction of the OCSD No. 2 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam. (3) Construction of the interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam only and the upgrading of existing systems within the study area. (4) Reclamation. (_5) No Project. 4. Nature and Scope of the Proposed Step 1 Project and Schedule for Completion of Specific Tasks, such as Project Report (breakdown to subtasks ok), EIR, Revenue Program, I/I Analysis Special Studies. TASKS Project Report Draft EIR Final EIR SCHEDULE Begin August 1976 September 1976 January 1977 Complete January· 1977 January 1977 March 1977 Preparation of the Revenue Program, the survey of cultural resources, and an I/I analysis should be included in the facilities·scheduling. Please submit an expanded schedule. 5. Itemized Description of the Estimated Costs for the Project (by tasks). Project Report EIR $37,500 $12,500 The above tasks and subtasks and their estimated costs comprise the eligible project and are as they will appear in the Step 1 grant offer package. These costs will serve as the basis for Step 1 project payment. Payment will be made upon completion and submittal of acceptable Step 1 work. "LL-2" AGENDA ITEM #22CA)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "LL-2" ·. Mr. Ray Lewis -3- Project No. C-06-1373 It should be noted that after the payment request is received by this office, three to four weeks processing time is required prior to the grantee's receipt of payment. Due consideration should be made for this time lag and its effect on cash flow. The costs outlined above are understood to be estimates, and are regarded as such by this office. This means that the Plan of Study approval does not constitute agreement by this office on any exact figures, and that we reserve the right to question costs to develop the facilities plan (refer to Section 2141, Limitations to Reasonable Costs, of the California Clean Water Grant Program Regulations, and to Section 35.935-7, Access, of the Federal Construction Grant Regulations). As enabled by Regulation 2133 (c), concerning capacity funding limitations, the State Board has elected use of the recent Department of Finance popu- lation projections based on an updated Series E fertility and 0 net in- migration for service areas in critical air basins and Series D fertility and 100,000 net in-migration for all other projections. These projections will apply to all Fiscal Year 1976-77 projects. · Special attention should be given to development of the project schedule. Time schedules must be compatible with requirements of any Regional Water Quality Control Board enforcement actions. Approval of a time schedule not compatible with Regional Board requirements does not relieve the applicant of his responsibility to achieve compliance with said requirements. We consider it essential to meet with each applicant during the preparation of the facilities plan to help expedite the grant process and to assist in the development of a project that will comply with all applicable Federal and State requirements. Meetings will be scheduled by the State evaluator at key ·points during preparation of the facilities plan. As provided under 40 CFR 35.925-lB(a) (3) a reserve of Step 1 grant assistance has been requested from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. There- fore, Plan of Study approval is your authorization to corrrrnence preparation of the facilities plan discussed herein. The Carbon Canyon Project is considered a project with the potential for an EIS to be required because of past local concerns over residential develop- ment of the area. The alternatives cited in the Plan of Study which will be considered in the Project Report would not likely increase development pressures in the upper area of the canyon; thus, an EIS may be avoidable. "LL-3" AGENDA ITEM #22CA)(l) -DISTRICT 2 '-"' "LL-3" t Mr. Ray Lewis -4- Project No. C-06-1373 This approval is for the Plan of Study approved herein and does not include approval of any associated studies to which the Plan of Study may refer. Four copies of the Project Report, together with four copies of the Project Report Surnnary form are due in this office by March 1, 1977. Mail to State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, P. O. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95801. Should you have any que~tions, please contact Bill Sukenik, the evaluator assigned to your project, at (916) 322-6576. f?~-:.-Y Jh_gff. '~r Larry F. Walker .'}£ Division Chief Manager, Clean Water Grant Pr.ogram cc: CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region 8 Mr. J. Califf, EPA, Region IX "LL-4" AGENDA ITEM #22CA)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "LL-4" lHE IRVINE COMPANY September 1, 1976 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 -----5~i0 Nr:wport Center Drive Newport l3cacll, California 92663 (714) 644-3011 Subject: Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 Gentlemen: The Irvine Company hereby requests that Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 (OCSD 5) annex approximately 3,430 acres (see attached precise boundary plat and legal description) of territory in its coastal area adjacent to the existing boundary of the District. The property described on the· attached plat has no resident inhabitants 'and The Irvine Company is sole ovmer of the entire area. Also attached is a listing of the assessed value of each separate parcel of land within the territory. The Irvine coastal community has a certified Environmental Impact Report prepared per Public Resources Code 21000 et seq. and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. The County of Orange served as the lead agency~· pursuant to Section 15065 of the State Guidelines and OCSD 5 was consulted as a responsible agency per Section 15066 of the State Guidelines. The Irvine Company suggests that pursuant to Section 15064 of the State Guidelines, the lead agency EIR is appropriate to serve as the EIR for OCSD 5 determinations on the underlying project which is the orderly development of the coastal plan. In this regard, attached is the Notice of Determination for the above-mentioned EIR. In order to meet LAFCO timing requirements and preserve the opportunity for agendiz- ing the annexation proceedings for their regular September 22 meeting, The Irvine Company submitted the attached letter of application for annexation dated August 27. The letter references the OCSD 5 hearing on September 8 and states that proposed terms and conditions are to be established at this hearing. It further states that as the sole property mmer, The Irvine Company grants permission to forego notice in hearing and requests approval that LAFCO proceed without notice and hearing and authorize OCSD 5 to proceed similarly. Enclosed with the letter was a check for · $300 to cover LAFCO processing fees. Enclosed with this letter are a check for $325 to cover District processing costs and a check for $525 to cover the State Board of Equalization processing fee. The State Board fee is based on last fiscal year's fee structure and will be adjusted when the fees effective July 1, 1976 have been computed. "MM-1" AGENDA ITEM #24(A) -DISTRICT 5 "MM-:1" Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 Page 2 September 2, 1976 As recommended by staff and supported by the OCSD 5 Board of Directors, it is under- stood and acceptable to The Irvine Company as property owner that annexation fees of $1,394/acre be paid to the District for 1,535 acres of land, which reflects the amount of land within the area of annexation designated for urban use on The Irvine Company's proposed land use plan {copy attached) . It is understood that The Irvine Company or its assigns will then be given a credit by OCSD 5 for 1,535 acres of land upon which it will not be held liable for annexation fees as development occurs in the future. The procedure under which this credit account would operate is to be worked out in detail with the respective staffs prior to the order of annexation. It is further understood that in the event land area in excess of 1,535 acres should 'be converted to urban use and the changed land use does contribute to the sewer system, then the area would be subject to the appropriate annexation fees enforce- able at the time of development. A deter~ination of whether annexation fees should or should not be charged on public open space will be made at the time of change to public ownership or when service is requested by a public entity. As agreed with staff, a letter of credit in the amount of $2,139,790 is enclosed to provide guarantee of payment for the 1,535 acres of urban use, based on the rate of $1,394/acre. Your support of this annexation request is respectfully requested . .._.,. Sincerely, ::i'!:=-.. c:----,,..._-:::;;r--~ "IO;.c:~--~-:::> -?Q C2.A:P Richard A. Reese Vice President Planning Department .ST/GBJ: lab Enclosures cc: ~tr. Fred Harper, OCSD 5 Mr. Bill Hurst, IRWD Mr. Ray Lewis, OCSD 5 -- "MN-2" AGENDA ITEM #24(A) -DISTRICT 5 "MM-2" LAW or nc cs or SUITE: 1020 .JAMf"S G. JC<Ou~><C: T>10M•S 1..wOOORuFF" S.COTT C NICHOLS CALIF"O~NIA l'"l~ST ElANK BUILDING Al::q:A CODC ''" 635 • C:.ZIZ 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 Honorable chairman and Board of Directors county Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain valley, ca. 92708 August 25, 1976 Re: Proposed Annexation No. 51-- 0range Park Acres Honorable Chairman and Board of Directors: As a result of the proceedings undertaken by the Board of Directors at its last regular meeting of August 11, 1976, I wish to point out to you the remaining p~ocedural, legal and administrative matters that must be considered by the Board of Directors in order to finally culminate the annexation and the development of the sewer system in the subject area. 1. At the request of the Directors, the next meeting will be held in the Orange Park Acres vicinity in order to attempt to obtain the highest possible cormnunity interest by attendance at that meeting. This meeting should be designed for two purposes-- namely, (a) providing the full explanation of the engineering design and the projected cost to the residents of the area and re- ceiving their co111.mcntary tlwreon; and (b) to satisfy the legal requirements relative to the formation of an improvement district, including the proposed acquisition and improvement in the amount of indebtedness to be incurred. The legal requirements are to give written notice to every property owner within the proposed annexation/improvement district territory; and therefore, the neighborhood meeting notice can satisfy both purposes as noted above. 2. In accordance with the prior action of the Board of Directors, the Orange Park Acres Association, acting as proponents of the proposed annexation, have paid the District approximately $9,.300.00 to defray all expenses incurred by the District for "Nr·~-1" AGENDA ITEM. #27(A) -DISTRICT 7 "NN:-1" Honorable Chairman and Board of Directors county Sanitation District No. 7 Page TWO August 25, 1976 engineering, administrative and legal expenses to date. As of this date, the District has expended approximately $7,000.00, and no portion thereof has been paid to special legal counsel. rt does include the legal fees incurred by the District for services rendered by this office relative to the entire proceedings. 3. We have advised the proponents that approximately $3,000.00 in additional funds will need to be deposited by the District prior to taking any further action, including the hearings on the.proposed improvement district and annexation. This will be used to off-set expenses to be incurred for the notices, the application for processfng fees at the L.A.F.C., and those fees of special legal counsel for bond purposes, together with the in-house cost for engineering, administration and legal. 4. The District Directors have previously authorized the General Manager to retain special bond counsel at such time as deemed appropriate. rt is the opinion and recorrunendation of both Mr .. Harper and myself that at such time as the additional monies are deposited by the proponents and the hearing is set for con- sideration of the improvement district, special counsel should be retained to assist this office and the District in formulating the precise requirements of conducting the bond election and the formulating of bond counsel opinion relative thereto. It is the recommendation that the law offices of Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch be retained for this purpose on a fee basis of a flat sum of $2,500.00 for all services required up to and including the election; and in the event of a successful passage of the bond issue, that the fee schedule be in accordance with the approved percentage scale based upon the value of the bonds actually sold. 5. It should be pointed out that if proceedings continue foiward, and the annexation election is held with the result of approvcil by the voters in the District, that sufficient funds will be generated from the bond proceeds to construct the main trunk sewer known as Reaches 17 and 18 of the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for the District. These funds will not be sufficient to acqui.re any subtrunks or local collector sewers. •rhose fa- cilities would necessarily have to be constructed with either developer contributions or other special assessment districts in the irrunediate vicinity where the additional sewer line is to be installed. "NN-2" AGENDA ITEM #27(A) -DISTRICT 7 "NN-2" Honorable Chairman and Board of Directors County S0nitation District No. 7 Page Three August 25, 1976 6. Upon a successful election and sale of the bonds, it would appear that the District would have an obligation to inunediately embark upon the securing of the trunk system as proposed in the program. This could be accomplished by any of the three following methods: a. A negotiated acquisition of the trunk sewer presently installed and owned by the City of Orange which meets District specifications; b. Acquisition of the City of orange sewer line by condemnation proceedings in the event of an unsuccessful negotiated acquisition; and c. The construction of a trunk sewer by the Sani- tation District t11at would be in aligmnent nearly parallel with the existing City of orange line. If any of the Directors have any specific inquiries concerning the future processing of this app.lication, I would ask that you 'Wf feel free to contact this office, as well as that of the General Manager and Chief Engineer .. TLW:pj cc: Mr. Fred A. Harper Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester Mr. Ray E. Lewis Very truly yours, /CJ?:Jt~- Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel "NN-3" AGENDA ITEM #27CA) -DISTRICT 7 "NN-3" "00" RESOLUTION NO. 75-169-5 AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO A\\'ARD CONTRACT NO. 5-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGe COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-20, UPON RECEIPT OF APPROVAL FROM CALIFORNIA COASTAL CONSERVATION COMMISSION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·* * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 76-122-5, approving plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side), Contract No. 5-20; and, WHEREAS, said resolution authorizes bids to be received and opened for said project on a date to be determined by the General Manager; and, WHEREAS, said project must be completed prior to December, 1976, and time is, therefore, of the essenc~; and, WHEREAS, said project must be approved by the California Coastal Conservation Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That following receipt of bids for Back Bay 'Trunk Sewer (East Side), Contract No. 5-20, the General Manager be authorized to establish the effective award date for said contract and to award same to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $275,000.00, upon approval from the California Coastal Conservation Commission; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be and are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with the awardee for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 3. That all other bids received for said work be rejected and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(BB) -DISTRICT 5 II 00". - CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS August 31, 1976 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT .. . . FUEL A "-1 0 OIL- , ~~~':"_:A_,u_r-_D~.., I I I· __ -__Bl11LDIN6 -...__....._...__. DROP P 1i>1 NG- DEL JV t:12.r D JO D?IVt:S F"O~ C OLLECT/Dl'J S'/STE" SET. FLIGHT C HAIN ,., - BEtl-iG Pt.ACED CJ S PZ CX:: !CCTS, · le rJ I . I 9 B 1 ' 5 4 :5 I 2 I 4 3 . 6 5 8 '1 10 9 12 II 14 13 1EtONDARY CL ARIF/EKS 'Z I ,.: . D/6E5TE~f PJPIAIG /IJ$71Jj.j.l:.- 7"/()I'./ c:1> N T/ N!J £ 9 AERATION BASIN1 ()()(} ?!P I NG 1NS TAL.LA T 1oiJ. c:=:=i CC> 1'.JTJ >JUC:.S · . W.A~rE ~LU06E Tfll,J(ENE~S ... • D POWEK 8UIJ.DIAIG 50 _MG D ACTIVA.TED SLUDGE PLANT CONTRACT NO. P1 -.16 ,. . ~ l l : ~ C.0.NTRACT .NO .. P1 -1.6 SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,000.00 PAID TO DATE: $26, 497, 896. 67 Contract is for the construction of Activated Sludge secondary treatment faailities at Plant No. l. The new faailities UJil'i aid the Districts in meeting rrrzndated State and Federal ocean disch.arge requirements. 1/hen co71pleted, tr.e secondary treatment system tM.ZZ process the 50 mgd of wastewater flolJJing through Plant No. l. The effluent will then bZend CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days . PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977 Lrith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaZ Z booster station, improving the overalZ quality of water pwnped through the outfall system into the ocean. Significant structures included in the contra.ct are the B"lower Building, Aeration Basins, Second- ary Cla.rifiers, i:A.Jo Digesters, Waste SZudge Thick- eners and the Power Building. . ACTIVITIES DUR ING THE PAST MONTH Work continues at a slow pace. In the Blower Building the engines have been set and leveled. The gears and blowers have not· been set. Some fresh air vent- ilation system fans and ducting are being installed. The Aeration Basin drop piping has ·been delivered but is not yet being installed. The sludge collection system drives have been set on the secondary clarifiers. The flight chains are being put onto the sprockets. The pressurization pumps are being set in the Waste Sludge Thickeners. Piping installation continues in the Digester control room and in the area tunnels. > ·. LAKE Q\$1.2 ---co~LETE TO BE c01~sTRucTED ---- .. . ,.,,, '\ •• '4.. •• • I .. • . :· ~ ·= ., ---. :· ....... .: .: er .. .. ... • # .. .. .. .. . CONTRACT 2 -14 -3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER 6 SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Oct. 15, 1975 $3,814,462.00 $1,543,533.00 Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125 mite reinf oI'Ced concrete pipe trunk Zine sewer a- long La. Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Irr.periaZ HUJy. i.n Anaheim. fizc first one-third of tr.e project uses 51" diam- eter pipe, the bal.ance is 48". Also included in the contract is a Zaterol con- nectoP Zirle to the Santa Ana River In teroeptor system from JOO' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a- long Imperial. H!JJY. to La. PaZma Ave. This 2750' CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12' 1976 section of 33n diameter vitrified clay pipe is designed to receive fZo~s from the South Rz:ver Trunk, serving Santa Ana Canyor.. With the comp le- tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa Ana Can- yon· pwrrping statwn can be abandoned. This sectwn of the interceptor cystem is designed to handle up to 35 miHion gallons flow per dazJ. Included in this figw.'e is 30 /.JGD allowance for accepting future high brine wasteu.'ater flOl.Js from San Bernazadino and Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH ·Pipe laying was halted on La Palma Avenue after crossing the Lakeview intersection. Work progressed slow in this area ·due to numerous interferring utilities, limited working area, and heavy traffic. Traffic flow was sl~edconsiderable, but constant control was main- tained. In total, only 153. feet of pipe was laid on La Palma. Clean-up and base paving continued along the back portion of La Palma Avenue. · Base paving reaced the Lakeview intersection. After shutting down on La Palma, work began on the .Santa Ana River crossing near La Palma and Imperial Highway. After diverting the river, successful dewatering was accomplished. The Contractor laid 262 feet of 33" v.c.p., encased in reinforced concrete. When-work is-resumed on La Palma, progress should improve due to better working conditions. Job should be completed in late November. DIST. 2 tr a COMPLETE ----To BE CONS'fRUCTED ./:40"100 ST, er~ SPRlllJG ST. CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4 PRIVATE RO. CONTRACT 2-14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH S Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: October 15, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $ 4, 24 0, 95 7. 00 PAID TO DATE: $4, 254, 641. 50 Contract is for construction of a S.1 mile long section of reinforced concrete pipe trunk Zine sewez' from Imperial, l!z,Jy. along La Palma Aveo in J.na.heim, traversing the new Yorba Regional PCII'k to '1eir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosses the Santa Ana River at iAi.10 places as it traverses county territory through Santa Ana Valley Irriga- tion Co. and. Bryant Ranch properties to Gypswn Rd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: January 7' 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 14 Calendar Days PROJECTED CO~tPLETI ON DATE: January 21, 19 7 7 Depending on design criteria, various sections of this Zine use 42, 45 and 51 inch diarneter pipe. This section LJit:l handle flows up to 32 miHion gallons per dayo Ir.eluded in this figure is 30 MGD aZZowance for accepting future high brine wastewater flOUJs from San Berna.rdi1!0 and Rivereide Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH All construction has been completed. c+ean-up and minor repairs have followed in preparation for the final inspection. It is expected that acceptance will be recommended at the September Board Meeting. \. . DIST. 2 ---- CONTRACT No. 2-14-5 · . -J: 0 I- ~ GYPS UN\ CANYON RO. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. CONTRACT 2-i4-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER REACHES 6, 7 & 8 S. S. Zarubica,· Contractor . STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: . PAID TO DATE: November 27, 1975 $2,096,676.15 $1,110,890.85 Contract ia for the construction of a 2. 4 mile 'Zeng section of reinforced cor.crete pipe Zine sew- er. The line goes through the Santa Ar.a Car.yon from ~here Contra.ct No. 2-14-4 er.ds in ahout the center of the Bryant Rc:nch property, along the route of the Santa Ana River and throw;h the northern portion of the Green River Golf Course to the County Line. The "Line terminates in a cor.troZ and metering structure desi~ed to measure flows from the upper basin counties. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·19 76 0 Calendar Days Sept. 21, 1976 The Zirze consists of 45, 42, and 39-inch diameter sections of pipe. The diarr;eters ch.ar.ge in rela- tion to design r,;quirerr:ents. This eection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor system wiZZ handle flows of approxir.ateZy 32 miZZion gaZZor.s per day. Included in this figure is 30 /.:GD aZZOUJar.ce for accepting future high brine wastei.i;ater floli)s frcm San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH ..._.,. .· Wo~k continues slow on this project, partly due to large amounts of ground water, making excavation difficult. Th~ Contractor reached the lower river crossi.ng and laid 300 feet of 42" "v.c .p. fully encased in reinforced concrete. It is expected that the job will be completed by the end of November. 7-N R.£ Plll~E.D LEAK. ___ _, DIST. 2 ----• 'IO f£ CG~'RUCITD CONTRACT No. 2-16-2 CONTRACT 2.-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN., FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: January 29, 19,76 ORlbINAL CONTRACT: $660,287.98 PAID TO DATE: $ 6 4 2 , 51 7 . 6 6 Contract is for cons~tion of a 1. 4 miZe sewer force main of 30-inch ductile iron pipe. This line will carry SeLJage pto7iped from the Yorba Linda Pw;p Station at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associ- ated Road in Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana Ri.ver Trunk line system at Palm Drive and Kroemer BouZeva:rd in Placentia. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 30 Calendar Days August 26, 1976 This force Train and the pwr.p station are dC'signed to reZieve the presently congested Newhcpe-PZccen- tia Trunk Line. It lJJi Zl serve proposed Zand use development of the tributary area tu the year> 2010. The force main is designed to accept up to 15 miZ- Zion gallons per d.ay flows. ACTIVITIES .DURING THE PAST MONTH Nearly all pipe is in the ground, but the line has not passed a pressure test. The line has been pumped to_the required 150 psi, but leakage is far greater than allowed. Two leaks have been found and repaired. One was at the corner of Palm Drive and Sapphire Road. The other was a dresse-r. coupling at the Yorba Linda Pump Station, which was installed under Contract 2-15. However, other unlocated leaks must exist as the line still won't meet the test requiremen~s. The contractor will continue to search for the leak or leaks. Close out will occur soon after a successful test. ·. I ·, , .. I . J l~LIM~COl.N -______.____..__AV.£. _, L L1Mns ot= ~11 A 1J b ) 0 11 SEVJE TO BE t<EPA1k!E.b n 1: DIST. 3. --COMPLETE ~ ~· ~ ~ .~ llll --TO BE CONSTRUCTED CITY OF Bl/ENA PARK CERRITOS CITY CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 CITY OP ANAJ-IEIM OLIA/DA AVE. N .. j . ROAD .i ~ f4 J .... 0 ~tl ~1 l ~ AVE. :1 !' ~. CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: March 6' 19 75 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00 PA I D TO DATE: $ 3 , 911 , 4 0 7 • 5 0 Contract is for installation of a Reinforced Con- crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer Zine from a point 1200 feet south of Kate Zla Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to LincoZn Avenue in· Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame- ters al'1e 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for 6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of the project. Flows from this reach wiU drain in- to Contract 3-20-1 to the south. This proj eat is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to reZieve the presently CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: . . TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 0 Calendar Days March 6, 1976 congested MiZZer-HoZder Trunk Sewer by intercep- ting flows from the r.orthwest portion of District 3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It wi7:l eventuaily extend to Imperial Avenue in La Habra. This portion of the relief system is designed to handle a fZow of 68 million gaUons per day arid ?Vi.ZZ serve the proposed developed land use pl.an in the tributar;:1 area to the yeal'1 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Cleaning and TV inspection of the 10" and 8" VCP sewer line was completed between Lincoln and Ball. The results show sags in nearly the entire line. In addition, about ten cracks or offset joints were observed. Infiltration was evident in a number of these. The contractor has been ordered to make the necessary repairs. He responded by denying responsibility for the defects observed and stated additional compensation would be required for them to remedy the situation. Talks are continuing. CRE SC.ENT AVE. AREA or TEL£"PHoNE C/\ BL£ l NTEkf E .kE.NCE: CAR80N CREEK C 1-1.ANNtL ':. ~-~ =··=·'··=·--·=: ===-.. -=,~~.--=· ... ·=-.. =.'--;j -- -u,.., _M_A_R_l_O_N ___ l ..__1 _A_V_E' - --nL-C_~_R_R_l_T_O_.;..S _ ___, ~ -·ExERC.tSE --,...1--------- TRAC K~---,l~-,,r-STABLE& l ...... 111 ___ I DIST. 3 COMPLETE ----TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-21-2 ---a S.P.R.R. _ JJWUll~)!!!l !II iii i I 1111 i I l I I I !I l:l:illlilllll ARROWHEAD ~: MFG. CO. I I 11 A _____ 1 J .~ATELL. AVE. CONTRACT 3-21-2 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29 B & P Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: April 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,177,745.00 PAID TO DATE: $ 417,189.00 Contract is for construction of a 2. ?5 mite sec- tion of vitrified clay pipe trunk line sewer through the City of Cijpress from Y.ateUa Avenue in Los A"lamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De.- pending on design critieria, the pipe line is in . various sizes from 15" to 30" in diameter. This section of line will complete the m::zster- planned Westside Re lief Interceptor sewer that be- gins at the Seal Beach Blvd. Pumping Station at CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' 1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' 19 7 6 Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. This system is designed to relieve the Los A lc.mitos Su!Jfr:irik, which at present functions as the m:::zin sewer for the westside basin. For the most pa:r't, this line is C1.A.1Tentiy flo..Jing at or near peak capacn:ty • 2'his section is designed to handle flol.Js up to 6.32 million gallons per day and will serve prc- posed Zand use plans in the tributari;:J to the year 2010. . · ACTIVITIE~ DURING THE PAST MONTH Work has slowed on Orange Avenue due to .interferring utility. The close proximity of a 10" sewer required. shoring of the excavated near Julie Beth Street. In addition, a telephone cable was 7 feet closer to the 21" v.c.p. sewer than indicated on the plans, requiring shoring along the last portion· of Orange Avenue. Where this shoring is required, only 30' to 50' of pipe is laid daily. Contractor laid 2,194' of pipe during August. Clean-up and base paving is complete on Denni Street. Base paving on Orange Street is approaching Moody Street. Ae.esss ~CAD ACR.C>GG ~CEVG no"PE!ay BONO AVE_. -t.' DIST. 7 ---- CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 WALN.UT SPR \NG . t- CJ) (/) w $ UJ CHAPMAN :r AVE. ST. AVE. c· ~· ._ ~ z <[. U) o. C. F. C:. O. === ======~= ~=====-==-============= ----II CONTRACT 7-6-9 TUSTI N-ORArJGE TRUNK SEWER PORTION OF REACH 14 AUD REACHES 15 AND 16 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: April 29, 1976 $295,826.40 $288,429.40 rhis contract is tJie last reach of ·the rrt:lster- planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer to be construc- ted by the District. It consists of a 1. 5 mile section of vitrified clay pipe line vaPying from · 18 to 21 inches in diameter. Construation tJill begin at Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street in Orange and go north to Santiago Canyon Road, where the project ends. The l.ine traverses portions of the City of Grange an.d un- incorpomted County area a"long its route. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 29, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct• 29, 1976 This portion of the trunk sewer will connect into an e:r:isting 18" sewe!' line naJ owned by the Ci t;y of Orange. The upstr·e~ system feeding to this point is scheduled to be purcr.ased by the District at a later date. Designed flow for this portion of the trunk line system is 4.65 MGD, and wi"l"l serve the _proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the year· 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Fina~ paving has been completed. A 12 feet wide road across the Reeve Property at Hewes Street and Villa Park Road has also been graded and paved. Recommendation for acceptance expe.cted at September Board meeting. ~ SUMMARY TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During August Total Work out to Bid DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During August Total Work Awaiting Award $31,243,463 27,845,181 200' 817 27,000 $17,583,869 12,634,108 350,000 0 Total Amount Under Contract, Awaiting Award and Out to Bid $31,243,463 27,000 $17,583,869 $48,854,332 ' .. . ,' I ! .( (.PRO Pe>':>E.D) GJ-11 ~ I~ I LL '"'J b.IR.PofZ-T ·---- ~­ .~ . . ~ .. ''::l &~ : I . { .( (PRO Po~e.o) GJ-l 1 tJc? 1-l t LL~ b..H~.Pol2-T ·--- ( L -~ .... I I ,( (PRO Po~e.O) c.1-i t t-.Jc:7 l-l 1 LL~..:>- ti.1 R. Po !2-T ·--- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Agenda Item Ne KJ+} CHANGE ORDER :ONTRACTOR: ____ R_e_w_e_s_-_sc_h_o~c~k_.__J_V ________________________ _ C.O. N0·~-=2:..---~--------------~ DATE Augyst 26. I 976 108: MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK, CONTR ACT NO . 11-!R-l Amount of this Change Order {)OH)) (DEDUCT) $ (731.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or :ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Adjustment of Quantities: Delete Item 15 . At the time of unable to obtain access to this requirement for an encroachment this manhole would need repair. repair. Deduct ($731 . 00) Original Contract Date Original Contract T i me Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time E x~ension Revised Contract Time Revised Complet i on Date Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 By~----------------------------------Con tractor design of this project, Districts was manhole due to Department of Transportation permit. It was assumed at that time that It was later found that it did not need March 25, 1976 120 Calendar Days July 23 , 1976 39 Calendar Days 39 Calendar Da y s 159 Calendar Days August 31, 1976 Qrlginal Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change c~~w (DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: .. .$ 37,253.00 . $ (1, 140.00) $ . (731. QO) $ 35.382.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By __ ~----------------~~~~~--~ Chief Eng i ne er JOINT CHAIRMAN 9-8-76 CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.~ WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS. HOLT MEYER OLSON PATTINSON REPORT ON THE ANNUAL CASA MEETING IN SAN DIEGO. YOU MAY WISH TO CALL ON DIRECTOR BARRETT FOR HIS COMMENTS. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 24 IUH\E lt\\f 11 \l\TEH UISTlllll P.O. Box D·I • 4201 Campus Drive• Irvine, Calif. 92716 • (714) 833-1223 September 8, 1976 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain VAlley, CA 92708 Subject: Proposed OCSD No. 5 Irvine Coastal Area Annexation Gentlemen: Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 has filed for the annexation of an additional 3,411 acres of Irvine coastal area in accordance with your approved Master Plan. This area is presently within the boundaries of the Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement District Nos. 104 and 204. Engineering studies prepared for ·IRWD indicate that the best sewage disposal solution of several alternatives for this area is to ann~x to OCSD No. 5. This solution will have the least environmental impact, is the least energy intensive and is the most cost effective for the ultimate taxpayer and resident of all possible alternatives. In the event the property did not develop as unincorporated territory, the District entered into an agreement dated September 11, 1972 and amended September 2, 1973, with the City of Newport Beach relative to possible future adjustment of service area boundaries. This agreement provides for the conveyance of certain water and sewer facilities, to- gether with service and bond obligations to the City if or when an ·annexation should occur, including applicable detachment proceedings. The Ir.vine Ranch Water District supports the annexation of 3,411 acres to Orange County Sanitation District No. 5. If further information is desired, we will be happy to supply it, relative to the terms and conditions of the proposed annexation. Sijc, ',Tely yours,,,·~ ft ( / ~ /,/'; ,/ /.,, ~ ,· . (. L-<-~!~Ir(_.; l;.((:~ ... ~ W,.(lliam F. Hurst · _, fienera 1 Manager -. I ! ··~ (,~ : .( (Pro Po~e.D) ~I~ 1-)1LL"? A.IP-Pof2-T ·---- ~ Cl> ;:, c.. Q) et 3 ~ . \~ . . = II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 -7:30 'P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (12) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-162, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, to Skipper & Company in the amount of $341,791.00. See pages "A" and "B" DISTRICT 2 (22) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items: (a) Consideration of items relative to engagement of firm for preparation of Feasibility Report regarding sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area: · (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated August 25, 1976, from the State Water Resources Control Board approving the plan of study re Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area. See page "C" (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for said services. See page "D" (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-164-2, approving award of contract to Engineering-Science, Inc . for preparation of Feas ibility Report re sewerage service for S leepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area, in form app roved by the General Couns e l , for a maximum fee not to exceed $ 33, 000. 00. See page "E" II A" RESOLUTION NO. 76-162 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. J-6-lD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CO NTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lD * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Skipper & Company for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No . J-6-lD, and the bid tabulation and proposal for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. J-6-10 be awarded to Skipper & Company in the total ·amount of $341, 791.00,. in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of D ~stricts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and s ign a contra ct with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and c ontract documents therefor, in form approve d by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are here by rejected and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, .1976. AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS II A" "B" ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -$300,000 BID TABULATION SHEET Da. te September 7, 1976 Contract For: INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 1. 2. JOB NO." J-6-10 CONTRACTOR Skipper & Company Midway City James E. Hoagland Company Long Beach F. T. Ziebarth Company Fullerton 4. Taymech Corporation Santa Ana · 5. r-:argate Construction, Inc. Carson 6. Pylon, Inc. Long Beach 7. Triad Mechanical, Inc. Stanton 8. 9. 10. AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS TOTAL BID . $341, 791. 00 . $356,400.00 . $365,400.00 $367,987.00 $397, 450. ·oo ·$419,822.00 $457,950.00 • "B II STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Gov..rnor STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY P. O. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95801 (916) 445-7971 .AUG 2 5 1976 In Reply Ref er to: 510:BS Mr. Ray Lewis Chief Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 97208 CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, PROJECT NO. C-06-1373, PLAN OF STUDY APPROVAL This office has reviewed the Plan of Study, dated June 28, 1976, for the subject project. The Division of Water Quality, with the concurrence of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board hereby approves the Plan of Study, specifically: 1. Study Area and Identification of the Entity or Entities that will be Involved in Conducting the Planning. This project will serve the drainage area of Carbon Canyon as delineated on the submitted map. The sewering agencies within the study area are County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, the City of Brea, and Chino Basin Municipal Water District. 2. Water Quality Problem or Sewerage Facilities Needs. "C-1" (1) Failing septic systems and the constraint of geological characteristics which prohibit the successful treatment of additional wastes by septic systems. (2) Poorly operating oxidation ponds and spray irrigation system serving the City of Brea which result in poor effluent quality. (3) Poorly operating treatment facility serving the Western Hills Golf -and Country Club which results in poor effluent quality. ·(4) Non-compliance with Basin Plan total dissolved solids concentration for discharge to ground water. AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 ~ ~ "C-1" Mr. Ray Lewis -2- Project No. C-06-1373 3. Treatment, Disposal or Project Alternatives to be Considered. (1) Construction of an interceptor sewer to convey raw waste from the upper area of Carbon Canyon down Carbon Canyon Creek for treatment at the OCSD No. 1 treatment plant and subsequent dis- posal. (2) Local treatment plants to serve each development and community with the construction of the OCSD No. 2 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam. (3) Construction of the interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam only and the upgrading of existing systems within the study area. (4) Reclamation. (5) · No Project. 4. Nature and Scope of the Proposed Step 1 Project and Schedule for Completion of Specific Tasks, such as Project Report (breakdown to subtasks ok), EIR, Revenue Program, I/I Analysis Special Studies. TASKS Project Report Draft EIR Final EIR SCHEDULE Begin August 1976 September 1976 January 19 77 Complete January 1977 January 19 77 March 1977 Preparation of the Revenue Program, the survey of cultural resources, and an I/I analysis should be included in the facilities scheduling. Please submit an expanded schedule. 5. Itemized Description of the Estimated Costs for the Project (by tasks). Project Report EIR $37,500 $12,SOll The above tasks and subtasks and their estimated costs comprise the eligible project and are as they will appear in the Step 1 grant offer package. These costs will serve as the basis for Step 1 project payment. Payment will be made upon completion and submittal of acceptable Step 1 work. "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "C-2" Mr. Ray Lewis -3- Project No. C-06-1373 It should be noted that after the payment request is received by this office, three to four weeks processing time is required prior to the grantee's receipt of payment. Due consideration should be made for this time lag and its effect on cash flow. The costs outlined above are understood to be estimates, and are regarded as such by this office. This means that the Plan of Study approval does not constitute agreement by this office on any exact figures, and that we reserve the right t.o question costs to develop the facilities plan (refer to Section 2141, Limitations to Reasonable Costs, of the California Clean Water Grant Program Regulations, and to Section 35.935-7, Access, of the Federal Construction Grant Regulations). As enabled by Regulation 2133 ·(c), concerning capacity funding limitations, the State Board has elected use of the recent Department of Finance popu- lation projections based on an updated Series E fertility and 0 net in- migration for service areas in critical air basins and Series D fertility and 100,000 net in-migration for all other projections. These projections will apply to all Fis.cal Year 19 76-77 projects. Special attention should be given to development of the project schedule. Time schedules must be compatible with req~irements of any Regional Water Quality Control Board enforcement actions. Approv·a1 of a time schedule not compatible with Regional Board requirements does not relieve the applicant of his responsibility to achieve compliance with said requirements. We consider it essential to meet with each applicant during the preparation of the facilities plan to help expedite the grant process and to assist in the development of a project that will comply with all applicable Federal and State requirements. Meetings will be scheduled by the State evaluator at key .points duri_ng preparation of the facilities plan. As provided under 40 CFR 35.925-lB(a) (3) a reserve of Step 1 grant assistance has been requested from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. There- fore, Plan of Study approval is your authorization to connnence preparation of the facilities plan discussed herein. The Carbon Canyon Project is considered a project with the potential for an EIS to be required because of past local concerns over residential develop- ment of the area. The alternatives cited in the Plan of Study which will be considered in the Project Report would not likely increase development pressures in the upper area of the· canyon; thus, an EIS may be avoidable. "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "C-3" Mr. Ray Lewis ~4- Project No. C-06-1373 This approval is for the Plan of Study approved herein and does not include approval of any associated studies to which the Plan of Study may refer. Four copies of the Project Report, together with four copies of the Project Report Sunnnary form are due in this office by March 1, 1977. Mail to State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, P. 0. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95801. Should you have any questions, please contact Bill Sukenik, the evaluator assigned to your project, at (916) 322-6576. ~J~~ ~r Larry F. Walker 1 Division Chief "C-4" Manager, Clean Water Grant P~ogram cc: CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region 8 Mr. J. Califf, EPA, Region IX AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "C-4" "D" CoU.NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 September 8, 1976 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Feasibility Report te Sewerage Service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canr.on Drainage Area In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for engineering services in connection with preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow- Carbon Canyon drainage area: Actual direct labor costs Plus actual eligible overhead (presently estimated at 135%) applied to direct labor costs Plus actual direct expenses Total above fees not to exceed $33,000.00 The Selection Cornmi tte~ hereby certifies the .above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed, and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Approved: /s/ Fred A. Harper Fred A. Harper General Manager /s/ Henry W. Wedaa Henry W. Wedaa Chairman, Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "D" -. RESOLUTION NO. 76-164-2 APPROVING AWARD OF ENGINEERING CONTRACT FOR PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY. REPORT RE SEWERAGE SERVICE FOR SLEEPY HOLLOW-CARBON CANYON DRAINAGE AREA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AWARD OF ENGINEERING CONTRACT FOR PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT RE SEWERAGE SERVICE FOR SLEEPY HOLLOW-CARBON CANYON DRAINAGE AREA * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange C?unty, have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, engineering proposals have been solicited for preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for the Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee established pursuant to Districts' procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services has negotiated a fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for the Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area; and has submitted certification of said final negotiated fee. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 · of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Certification of Negotiated Fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for engineering services in connection with Feasibility Report re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area, and the proposal for said work arc hereby received and ordered filed; and, "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(3) -DISTRICT 2 "E-1" .- Section 2. That the contract for preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for the Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area be awarded to Engineering-Science, Inc. for a maximum fee not to exceed $33,000.00, in accordance "-"" with their proposal; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said engineer for said work pursuant to the provisions of their proposal and the contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976. "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(3) --DISTRICT 2 MEETING DATE September 8, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT I (EVANS). •..••••• GARTHE •.•••• _.J::::::::. ___ _ (EDGAR) •••••••.• SHARP .•••.• ~ ---- DIEDRICH .•• ---1...k::._ ___ _ RIMA ••• ••••• _.L_ ---- DISTRICT 2 (GROOT). ••.••••• WEDAA ••••••• ~ ___ _ HOLLINDENL .•• SCOTT ••••••• ~ ---- DIEDRICH) ....•• CLARK ••••••• _t::::_ GARTHE). ..••••• ~ • • . • • • • v ---- WEDDLE) ..•..•.• FOX ..•....••• --.,.L ---- DE J~sus>.. •••• HOLT .••.••••• ~ == == THOM) •••.•...•• KAYWOOD •.... ~ ___ _ PERRY ••••••• ......lL... (HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH •••.... ~ ---- ~TIPTON) •••••••• WINN ••.•.••• .....!.L_ == == WARD) • . • . . • • • • • WOOD • • • • • • • • -.L-__ __ GRAHAM) ...•.••• YOUNG ••••••• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 3 (WARD) ••..•.•••• WOOD ••••.••• ~ ___ _ (HOLLJNDEN) • · · · SVALSTAD· • · · ---J.L. ---- (GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· ~ ---- (WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ ----1L ---- (SYLVIA) ••...•.. ~··········~ ------ CULVER······ ~ ---- ! GARTHE) •......• ~ ••····· _1L.. -- PRIEST).······· FRESE······· --l.L----- THOM)···· ...... KAYWOOD····· -!L----- LACAYO) ...•..•. MAC LAIN····~ ---- DAVIS) •.....•.• ~ ••••..• ~ ___ _ OLSON·· .. ·•· ~ __ -- DIEDRICH) .. ·••· SCHMIT······ ~ ___ _ ~WI EDER) .. • .... • PATTINSON .. • ~ __ -- YOUNG)· .. ······ STEVENS .. · .. -i..L. __ -- MILLER)·· .... ·• WEISHAUPT··· _u:::::=. __ -- DISTRICT 5 MC INNIS .... ....iL. ___ _ (DIEDRICH).. .... RILEY ....... ~ ___ _ (WILLIAMS) •....• ROGERS •...•• ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 6 RIMA ••••.••• _L.. ___ _ (ROGERS) ......... RYCKOFF ..... _L ___ _ DIEDRICH···~ ___ _ DISTRICT 7 ! EDGAR) •.•...••. SALTARELLI . V ___ _ ROGERS) •.••.•.• BARRETT· .. •· --1L. ___ _ SILLS) •..•...•• BURTON ..•••• ~ ___ _ DIEDRICH) ..... · CLARK······· ~ ___ _ EVANS)· .. · .. · .. GARTHE • • .. • • ~ ___ _ GLOCKNER···· -1L-___ _ (HOYT)·· .. ••·••· SMITH······· --lL. __ -- DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT...... V ___ _ . SHENKMAN .••• -.JJ.L ___ _ WIEDER ...... _L __ -- DISTRICT 8 (°'1 EDR I CH)., • • • . EY ..... . ~/ EDW ... . (JOHNSON) .•..•.. SWEENEY····· 7 /14/76 JO INT BOARDS (ROGERsi .•.••••• BARRETT· .•••• _.JL:._ __ DIEDRICH ···...Lb'... -- !GRAY)) •••••••••• BLACKMAN •••• ~ __ SILLS ···~······BURTON •••••• -L __ DI ED R IC HJ •••••• CLARK • • • • • • . v __ WEDDLEL •.••••• COOPER ..••••• -L __ SYLVIA) ••••••••• MK •••.•••••• ~ __ CULVER ••••.•• ~ __ ~GARTHE). .••••••• ~ •••.•••• ~ _ WEDDLE) ..••.•••• FOX •..•••.••• -7 __ PRIEST) .......... FRESE •.•.•••• ___ _ ~) .......... G:':RTl'.E. •••••• -=-__ GLOCKNER •..• --;..L. __ ~DE J~sus) ...... HOLT ....•.••. _.iL -- THOM) ••..••.•••• KAYWOOil ..••• ~ __ LACAYO) •••••..•• MAC. LA IN.... V"" __ MC INNIS ••.• ~ __ (DAVIS) •••••••••• ~ .••••..• ~-- OLSON ••.••..• ~ __ (WI EDER) •..••••• PATTINSON... t./" __ PERRY........ I./ __ (DIEDRICH) .•.••. RILEY •.•..••• ~ __ RIMA ••••.••.• ~ __ ~WILLIA~S) •.•.•• ROGERS .••.••. _L __ ROGERS} •••••••• RYCKOFF...... v""'" __ EDGAR) ••..•.•.•• SALTARELLI •• ~ __ DIEDRICH) .•..•. SCHMIT....... L/"""" __ (HOLLI NDEN) ..••• SCOTT .....••• -1:::'.:.... __ (EDGAR) ..••.•••.• SHARP .....••• ~ __ SHENKMAN •.•• ~ __ (HOYT) .•••.••••.• SMITH ...••••. ~ __ (YOUNG) .....•••.. STEVENS ••••. -L-__ (HOLLI NDEN) ••.•. SVALSTAD •••• __..L.. __ (GROOT) •..•••••.. WEDAA ...••••• ~ __ (MILLERL ••••••• WEISHAUPT •.. _L_ __ WIEDER •.•••• _L_ __ ~TIPTONL •••••.• WINN......... \/" __ WARD) •••••••.•.• .WOOD ..•..•••• _lL_ __ GRAHAML ••..••• YOUNG .•.•••.• ___.L_ __ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS MEETING D~TE September 8, 1976 TIME ?·30 pm DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 {EVANS). •.•••••• GARTHE •••••• _____ _ (EDGAR) •••••••.• SHARP ••.••. ------DIEDRICH .•• _____ _ RIMA • • • • • • · • ------ DISTRICT 2 {GROOT) •••. ). ••••• WEDAA ••••••• _____ _ (HOLLI NDEN ...•• SCOTT ••••••• (DIEDRICH) ..•..• CLARK .••.•.• ------ (GARTHE). ••.•... EVANS ••••••• ------ ~WEDDLE) .•.•••.• FOX ..••.••••• ------ DE J~sus) ••••.• HOLT ••.•••••• == == == THOM) ••••••.... KAYWOOD •..•. PERRY ••••••• ------ (HOYT) ••••.••••• SMITH ••••••• ------ ~TIPTON) •••••••. WINN ... 1rtfb. -1 == == WARD) ••••...•.. WOOD ••• :h • J ___ _ GRAHAM) .••••••• YOUNG • • • • • • • _____ _ DISTRICT 3 (WARD) •••...••.• WOOD •••.•••• _____ _ (HOLLJNDEN). ·•· SVALSTAD···· ____ -- (GRAY).········· BLACKMAN···· _. _ ---· _ (WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ ------ (SYLVIA).· .. •·•• COX·········· ____ __ CULVER······ ------ ! GARTHE) .. ······EVANS······· __ ---- PRIEST).· .. · .. · FRESE······· ____ -- THOM)· ......... KAYWOOD····· ------ LACAYO) •..•.... MAC LAIN···· ------ DAVIS)········· MEYER ...... • __ ---- OLSON · · · · • • • ------ (WI EDER).······· PATTINSON··· ____ -- (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT······ ____ -- (YOUNG)········· STEVENS····· _____ _ (MILLER) ........ WEISHAUPT··· ____ -- DISTRICT 5 MC INNIS •••. _____ _ (DIEDRICH) .•.• ~. RILEY ..•.••• _____ _ (WILLIAMS) .•.... ROGERS .•..•• _____ _ DISTRICT 6 RIMA •.•••••• (ROGERS) ......... RYCKOFF ..... == == == DIEDRICH··· _____ _ DISTRICT 7 ! EDGAR) •.•..••.• SALTARELLI • _____ _ ROGERS).······· BARRETT····· _____ _ SILLS) ......... BURTON.· .. •• _____ _ DIEDRICH) ..... • CLARK· ... •·• _____ _ EVANS)········· GARTHE • • .... _____ _ GLOCKNER···· (HOYT) .. ·•··• .. • SMITH······· == == == DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _____ _ . SHENKMAN .... _____ _ WIEDER .••••• _____ _ DISTRICT 8 (DIEDRICHL .... RILEY •....•• EDWARDS .... . (JOHNSON) .••.... SWEENEY .... • 7 /14/76 JOINT BOARDS (RoGrnsi •••••••• BARRETT· .••.• _I __ _ DIEDRICH •·• _iL_ -- ! GRAY)) •• · •••••••• BLACKMAN •••• _, __ _ SILLS ···~······BURTON •••••. _'/ __ _ DIEDRICHJ ...... CLARK ....... + __ WEDDLE) .•••••••• COOPER ••••••• ___ _ SYLVIA) •••••••. :cIDr. ......... + __ CULVER ••••••. ___ _ ~GARTHE~ •••••••.• E-¥-A-NS •••••••• __;!,,_ __ WEDDLE ••••••••• FOX •••••.•••. _.; __ _ PR I EST •••••••.•• ~~ ~~~:.: •.•• ~-­ EVANS) •••••••••. ~ •• 7--- GLOCKNER •••• ___ _ ~DE J~sus) ...... HOLT......... I -- THOM) ........... KAYWOOU ..... -7-__ LACAYOL ....... MAC LAIN .•.• -r __ MC INNIS .... -]--__ (DAVI s) •••••••••• MEYf!R-: ,, •••.• ___ _ OLSON ........ +-- (WI EDER) ........ PATT I NSON... · PERRY........ ~, == ( D I ED R IC H) .•..•• R I LEY. . • . . • • • · RIMA ......... --f-- WILLIAt-1S) •••..• ROGERS....... -- ROGERSl •••••••• RYCKOFF .•.••• -7 EDGAR) ••..•••..• SAL TAR ELLI.. -- DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ••.•••• --5-== HOLLI NDEN) .•••• SCOTT ....•••. EDGAR) .......... SHARP........ l)J == SHENKMAN.... 0..,, (HOYT) .•••••.••.. SMITH ........ --Y -- (YOUNG) .......... STEVENS ••••. --+== (HOLLI NDEN) ••.•. SVALSTAD.... · (GROOT) .......... WEDAA........ ? == (MILLERl •.••••.. WEISHAUPT... __ WIEDER •.•••• ---:r (TIPTONL ••••••• WINN ......... -r == (WARD) ••••••.••.•. WOOD......... . __ (GRAHAML ••.•••• YOUNG ••.•.••• 7_ __ OTHERS HARPER \'/ w.4Ji~ SYLVESTER -v LEWIS ./ ~o CLARKE _L BWbGR __, ].ril\./""'"'-. BROWN --vr- !h~,l~ WOODRUFF -:/ !! ev~ HOHENER _L. f:xc HOWARD ~/ ~~~If-HUNT KEITH \. KENNEY ~ LYNCH MADDOX ~ MARTINSON PI ER SALL STEVENS TRAVERS JOINT CHAIRMAN 9-8-76 CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.J WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS, ~ MEYER ~ PATTINSON REPORT ON THE ANNUAL CASA MEETING IN SAN DIEGO, YOU MAY WISH TO CALL ON DIRECTOR BARRETT FOR HIS COMMENTS, I I - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) September 2, 1976 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 11 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976, 6:00 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of August 11, 1976, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, will meet in an adj 0 1.irned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss the Draft Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation District No. 11. A light dinner will be served. JWS:rb II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orang~ County, California DISTRICT No. 11 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 8J 1976 -6:00 P.M. (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment ~f Chairman pro tern, if necessary Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (3) Discussion re Draft Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation District No . 11 (copies of proposed District Master Plan and proposed City Master Plan enclosed) · (4) Other business and communications (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULA R JO INT MEETING OF THE BOARD S OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7 AN D 11, 1 OF ORAN GE COUNTY , CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Bo ards of Direc tors of County San ita tion Distr icts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Cali fo rnia, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., September 8 , 1976 , 10844 Elli s Avenue, Fountain Val ley, California. The Chairman o f the Joint Adm ini s trative Organization cal led the mee ting to order at 7 : 30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretar y reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * DI STRICT 1 Moved, secon ded a nd du l y carried : Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of Coun ty San i tation District No. 1 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m ., September 22, 1976, The Chairman then declared t he meeting so adjourned a t 8:21 p.m ., September 8, 1976. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That t h is meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7 :00 p.m ., September 13, 1976, at Huntington Beach Cit y Hal l . The Chairman then dec l ared the meeting so adjourned at 8:22 p.m ., September 8, 1976. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded a nd duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of Co unty Sanitation District No . 5 be ad j ourned t o 5 :30 p.m., September 21 , 197 6, at Newport Beach City Hall. Th e Chairman then dec l ared the meeting so adjourned a t 8:40 p.m ., Sept ember 8 , 1976 . STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTE R, Secr e tary of each of the Boards o f Directors of County Sanitation Districts No s. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, an d 11, of Orange County, Californ ia, do h ereby certify that the above a nd foregoi ng to be full, true and correct c opy of minute entries on mee ting of said Boards of Dire ctors on the 8th day of September , 19 76 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave he reunto 19 76 . S-107 l. day of September e oards Direct ors tation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 11 September 3, 1976 TO: DISTRICT NO. 11 DIRECTORS SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 I 0844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Adjourned Regular Meeting on September 8, 1976 Enclosed herewith are the Draft Master Plans referred to under subject agenda item. The meeting notice and agenda were mailed under separate cover. Enclosures (2) Rita Brown Assistant to the Secretary of the Board COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING August 12, 1976 -5:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held August 11, 1976, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date, at the Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The roll was called, and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHER PRESENT: Kerm Rima (Chairman) and Paul Ryckoff Ralph Diedrich Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, and Dennis Reid Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Director Don Mcinnis, Director Thomas Riley, Director Howard Rogers, ·Richard Reese, Don Simpson, and Bill Soto * * * * * * * * * * * Approval of minutes Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund claims That payment of Districts' claims on the following dates be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund July 20, 1976 $164,407.76 14,212.44 $178,620.20 August 3, 1976 $108,429.61 539,201.45 $64 7, 631. 06 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-3" and "B-1" through "B-3", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. 8/12/76 Approving Change Order No. 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-9-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the pians and ~ specifications for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No; J-9-2, granting a time exten- sion of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company, be approved due to delays caused by having to coord~nate the work with the Districts' operations. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Approving Change Order No. 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: to the plans and specifications for Job No. Pl-16 That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing an addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction Company, be approved for purchase of a spare pump impellar. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. J-6-lD That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on August 31, 1976. Certified copy of this re3olution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Approving plans and Moved, seconded, and duly carried: specifications for Specification No. E-080 That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-133, approving plans and specifications for Three (3) Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for an amount not to ex~eed $50,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. I-4-lR That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-134, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities, Job No. I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on October 5, 1976. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-135, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, to Instrwnentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc., in the amount of $22,688.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -2- Awarding purchase order contract for Purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-024 8/12/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for Purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution,· Specification No. P-024, be received and ordered filed; and that award of said purchase to Stauffer Chemical Company, for the price of $.10 per pound for a maximum amount not to exceed $75,000, be authorized. Accepting Job No. P2-8-8 as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-136, accepting Brookhurst st·reet Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agree- ment. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company at Plant No. 2 for transformer vaults Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-137, approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for installation of three underground transformer vaults behind the sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundaries of Plant No. 2, for no fee. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Authorizing Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members to attend WPCF and AMSA meetings; and autho- rizing reimbursement for expenses Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members be authorized to attend cqncurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 3-8, 1976; and that reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said meetings, be authoriz~d. Approving waiver of quarterly administrative charge to Moved, seconded, and duly carried: District No. 8 That waiver of the $150.00 quarterly administrative charge to County Sani- tation District No. 8 for fiscal year 1976-77, be approved. Re.ceive and file written report of the Executive Committee received and ordered filed. Approving Memorandum of Understanding with OCEA re proposed retirement system transfer Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Committee, dated August 4, 1976, be Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Tirnt the Memorandum of Understanding with Orange County Employees Association relative to terms and conditions of proposed transfer from Public Employees Retirement System to Orange County Employees Retirement System, be approved. -3- 8/12/76 Declaring intent to approve transfer of Districts' retirement program from PERS to OCERS from Public Employees Retirement Retirement System, in accordance Code. Approving amendment to LA/OMA Joint Powers Agreement re increase of scope of said study, and approving parti- cipation in ocean disposal studies Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the-Board of Directors hereby declare their intent to approve a trans- fer of the Districts' retirement program System to the Orange County Employees with Section 20569 of the Government Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-144, approving amend- ment to the Joint· Powers Los Angeles/ Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program agreement, to provide for an increase in the scope of the study and a grant augmentation therefor; and funding of the ineligible portion of the ocean disposal studies and authorizing participation in said ocean disposal studies. ·certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these min~tes. Policy re Executive Committee member attendance at State association meetings Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That a policy be hereby established that each Executive Committee member, or the member's designee, be authorized to attend State association workshops and executive meetings on behalf of the Districts; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for fees and expenses in accordance with established Board policy be authorized and approved. Receive and file staff report re additional hydraulic treatment capacity filed. Receive and file staff report re JPL-ACTS process Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That t~e staff report on additional hydraulic treatment capacity, dated August 5, 1976, be received and ordered Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff report on the operation and evaluation phase of the JPL-ACTS process, dated August 4, 1976, be received and ordered filed. Authorizing staff to proceed with facility modifications to the JPL-ACTS process and continued operation and evaluation, subject to SWRCB approval approval of the State Water Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to proceed with facility modifications to the JPL- ACTS process and continued operation and evaluation of said process through June 30, 1977, subject to written Resources Control Board. -4- 8/12/76 Approving revised Step 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Facilities Plan, EIS and ,..,_,. Pilot Plant evaluation That the revised Step 1 Facilities Plan, budget, and authorizing Environmental Impact Statement and Pilot transfer of funds for Plant evaluation budget in the amount of continued operation and $4,170,000, be approved; and, evaluation and necessary modifications to the FURIBER MOVED: That transfer of up to JPL-ACTS process $489,000 to the Joint Operating Fund from the Operating Fund Unappropriated Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their propor- tional participation in the Joint Operating budget, for continued operation and evaluation of said process, be authorized;· and, FURTIIER MOVED: That transfer of up to $125,000 to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund from the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their Joint Works equity percentage participation in the CORF budget, for necessary modifica- tions to the JPL-ACTS process, be authorized. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing General Manager to employ Part-time Techni- cians re JPL-ACTS process That the General Manager be authorized to employ Part-time Technicians as provided in Resolution No. 75-138, as amended by Resolution No. 76-24, through June 30, 1977, in connection with continued operation of the JPL-ACTS process. Authorizing amendment to the NASA contract re JPL-ACTS process for required services re continued operation and evaluation of said process Moved, seconded, and duly carried: . . That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-145, authorizing amendment to the contr~ct with National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Authorizing amendment to the John Carollo Engineers contract for required services re continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-146, authorizing amendment to the contract with John Carollo Engineers for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -5- 8/12/76 Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal· year budgets be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT 6 Operating Fund Bond and Interest -1951 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 575,459 64,598 3,396,441 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $4,036,498 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed. Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:10 p.m., August 12, 1976. Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County·, California -6- JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF v 30344 30345 30346 30347 30348 30349 30350 30351 30352 30353 30354 30355 30356 30357 30358 30359 30360 30361 30362 30363 30364 30365 303~6 3'0367 30368 ~ 30369 "30370 30371 30372 30373 30374 30375 30376 30377 30378 30379 30380 30381 30382 30383 30384 30385 30386 30387 30388 30389 30390 30391 30392 30393 ._,.,,,, 30394 30395 30396 30397 Alex Fish Company, Lab Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearing Material Allensworth Company, Sight Dome American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals (MO 12-10-75) American Kleaner Mfg Co., Inc., Truck Parts City of Anaheim, Power V. B. Anderson, Truck Parts Banning Battery Company, Batteries Beckman Instruments, Controls W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair CS Company, Valves Cals Cameras, Photo Supplies R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage Civic Center Lock & Safe, Lock Repair Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance, Employee Bond Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orange, Training Meeting County Wholesale Electric, Supplies Mr. Crane, Equipment Rental Crane Packing Company, Engine Repair Culligan Deioninzed Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence Cununings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daniels Tire Service, Tires C. R. Davis Supply Company, Hardware Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Filter Supply Company, Filters Fischer & Porter Company, Valves Foss Company, Lab Supplies Compressor Products Division of Garlock, Compressor Parts Garrett Industrial Supply Company, Cleaners General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal Graphic Controls, Chart Paper Griffith Company, Regrade Manhole Hasty Lawn & Garden, Hedge Trimmer Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts City of Huntington Beach, Plant #2 Water Hurley Electronics, Inc., Lamps Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Irvine Ranch Water Districts, Line Cleaning Water Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Plastic Sheeting LBWS, Inc., Safety Equipment, Nitroien, Oxygen, Acetylene L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service "A-1" $ AMOUNT 53.00 262.76 23.17 22,625.07 90.59 147.27 8.80 240.73 646.20 16.65 695.00 386.25 74.22 5.40 4.00 6,162.00 101.18 160.86 6,194.20 241. 56 70.00 103.80 244.00 206.01 40.00 12.00 309.48 262.54 349.80 175.00 67.60 421.97 100.70 268.74 . 39. 43 2,279.36 41.34 945.00 22.54 1,400.00 205.96 300.00 743.51 434.09 597.96 850.62 303 .16 213.55 968.19 19.56 189.19 207.65 217.90 11515.85 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30398 30399 30400 30401 30402 30403 30404 30405 30406 30407 30409 30410 30411 30412 30413 30414 30415 30416 30417 30418 30419 30420 30421 30422 30423 30424 30425 30426 30427 304.28 30429 30430 30431 30432 30433 30434 30435 30436 30437 30438 30439 30440 30441 30442 30443 30444 30445 30446 Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware $ Mccalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Multiquip, Inc., Equipment Parts National Chemsearch, Odor Control Chemicals City of Newport Beach, Water Orange County Water District, Basin Equity Replenishment Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Red Valve Company, Inc., Expansion Joint Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Routh Transportation, Oil Removal Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors Sargent Welch Scientific Compapy, Lab Supplies Seal Methods, Inc., Pump Packing Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools, JPL Vacuum Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Sims Industrial Supply, Safety Glass Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern California Edison, Power Southern California Costal Water, 1976-77 Deposit Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Drinking Water Standard Concrete Material, Concrete State of California, Department of Transportation, State Pennit Inspection Surveyors Service Company, Office Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement Bruce J. Taylor, Employee Mileage Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings 'Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Steel Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Delivery United Riggers and Erectors, Engine Unloading Unites States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Materials Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Service, EDP Services Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Everett H. York, Engine Parts AMOUNT 50.98" 36. 25. 524.70 40.81 9.50 1,100.28 68.02 246.98 9.81 386.76 303.48 180.13 23.70 1,083.97 956.09 381. 85 106.93 80.38 428.24 94.82 43.38 25.14 395.00 5 ,371. 07 86,600.~ 186.56 92.08 33.06 32.05 233.64 41.46 1,051.60 1,450.81 82.20 14.32 666.63 279.84 132.96 . 34. 26 43.86 220.60 431. 42 2,524.50 16.20 59.22 4,186.95 1,490.27 289.59 $ 164,407~ "A-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN· PAYOR OF ....,. 30341 Hasty Lawn & Garden, Groundskeeping Equipment 30342 Safety.Service and Supply, JPL Filters 30343 Valve and Primer Corporation, Retention J-6-1 "A-3" AMOUNT $ 303.22 213.17 13,696.05 $ 14,212.44 $ 178,620.20 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30490 30491 30492 30493 3·0494 30495 30496 30497 30498 30499 30500 30501 30502 3.0503 30504 30505 30506 30507 30508 30509 30510 30511 30512 30513 30514 30515 30516 30517 30518 30519 30520 30521 30522 30523 30524 30525 30526 30527 30528 30594 30529 30530 30531 30532 30533 30534 30535 30536 30537 30538 30539 30540 30541 30542 A-1 Metal Services Corporation, Control Panel AM-Fremont Bag & Salvage, Building Materials Advance Business Forms, Computer Paper Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings American Chemical Society, Periodical American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts, Gaskets American Society for Testing, Catalog The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing Associated Concrete Products, Grade Rings Charles M. Bailey Company, Inc., Valve Parts Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuilt Magtronic. Thomas G. Brisco, Employee Mileage Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Employee Exams C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair Cals Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Castle Controls, Inc., Valves Coast Insurance Agency, Fire Insurance Premium Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enterprise Printing, Printing Fischer & Porter Company, Regulator Parts Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-way Mapping Edward R. Francis, Employee Expense Reimbursement, Pl-16 General Telephone Company HMK Marketeer Limited, Electric Cart Parts Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tubes House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts & Repairs City of Huntington Beach, Water Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Tools Keenan Pipe and Supply, Pipe King Bearing, Inc., Couplings, Bearings, V Belts Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies LBWS, Inc., Acetylene, Oxygen L & N Unifonn Supply Company, Unifonn Service Life Security Systems, First Aid Supplies Los Angeles Times, Subscription A. J. Lynch Company, Janitorial Supplies McCalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL Mobil Oil Corporntion, Petroleum Products National Lumber Supply, Building Materials City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Specification Supplies "B-1" $ AMOUNT 309.5~ 275.63 207.72 117. 00 128.88 12.00 708.55 7.09 232.47 101. 76 138.03 112 .16 17.70 26.00 485.00 89,.64 ·80. 56 7,500.00 200.49 325.82 1,238.50 140.14 310.13 51.90 13.4( 31.8~ 528.61 104.52 1,282.01 1,757.80 138.23 220.40 87.62 52.83 370.44 516.30 10.11 121.48 46.64 143.58 319.31 479.20 382.94 335.16 593.16 515.39 49.00 109.07 63.07 5,239.11' 74.7~ 18.79 5. 27 . 227.42 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. 30543 30544 30546 30547 30548 30549 30550 30551 30552 30553 30554 30555 30556 30557 30558 30559 30560 30561 30562 30563 30564 30565 30566 30567 30568 30569 30570 30571 30572 30573 30574 30575 30576 30577 30578 30579 30580 30581 30582 30583 30584 30585 30586 30587 30588 30589 30590 30591 30592 30593 Office Equipment Company, Calculator Repair Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp Oreo Block Company, Inc., Concrete Blocks Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Industrial Supply, Tools Pacific Telephone M C Patten Corporation, Instrumentation Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Actuary Service Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Postmaster Quality Building Supply, Plastic Cement, Silica Sand RFL c/o Luscombe Engineering, Controls The Register, Bid Notice P-024 The Republic Supply, Pipe Fittings Rewes-Schock, JV, Contractor 11-lR-1 Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Ryan Herco, Lab Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repairs Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools Shepherd Machinery Company, Conveyor Repair Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies Southern California Edison, Power South Orange Supply, PVC Pipe Southern California Gas Company, Natural Gas Southern California Water Company, Water Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Drinking Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline Sun Electric Corporation, Fan Parts The Suppliers, Tools Surveyors Service Company Tatkin Company, Regulator C.O. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene Title Insurance & Trust Company, Title Report 7-6-9 Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Gauges Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Exhaust Fan Repair United Parcel Service, Delivery Unites· States Elevator Corporation, Maintenance Agreement United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Van Waters & Rogers, Caustic Soda Warren and Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fittings Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Salt Company, Salt Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Zellar's Cycle, Bicycle "B-2" $ AMOUNT 48.43 13.30 424.48 1,378.22 85.48 349.79 496.04 354.68 700.00 324.82 500.00 779.43 76.11 20.00 774.03 8,416.58 336:73 58.97 233.05 134.79 401. 85 ' 415.73 2,794.78 580.64 51,594.42 9.81 2,471.32 3.74 20.99 232.45 7.48 31.64 413.05 114. 00 90.63 67.76 SO.OD 186.00 38.47 615.50 113. 08 8.07 33.00 3,107.41 2,033.24 116 .17 155.74 114. 88 185.71 262.90 $ 108,429 .. 61 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 CAPITAL.OtITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30344A Beverly Pacific Corporation, Contractor PW-047 30345A Burling Instrument Company, Temporary .Controls 30346A Calgon Corporation, Activated Carbon, JPL 30347A John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, JPL 30348A County of Orange, Compaction Testing P2-8-8 30349A Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16 30350A Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment 30351A Fleming Construction, Contractor P2-8-8 30352A General Electric Supply, Recording Meter 30353A J.B. Gilbert & Associates, Facilities Plan EIR 30354A Isco Company, Instrumentation 30355A Imperial Oil & Grease Company, Grease JPL Maintenance 30356A McCalla Brothers, Contractor PW-049 30357A Mine Safety Applicances Company, Safety Equipment 30358A NASA-Pasadena Office, Release Retention, JPL 30359A Pepsi Company Building Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent 30360A Ramsey Engineering Company, Field Service, Weighveyor JPL 30361A The Register, Bid Notice PW-052 30362A Smith Emery, Pipe Testing Pl-16 30363A Truesdal, Scrubber Emissions Testing, JPL 30364A F.T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2 "B-3" $ $ $ AMOUNT 2J135. 81'-"' 58.03 4,134.00 1,489.65 631. 96 446,260.20 340.85 701.18 916.90 21,124.84 1,774.14 212.96 3,784.14 195.89 48,019.40 254.40 805.13 98,97 13.00 1,750.00 4,500.00 539,201.45 647 ,631. 06~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING August 12, 1976 -5:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held August 11, 1976, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date, at the Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The roll was called, and the Secretary reported a quorum present. .DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Don Mc!nnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers None Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, and Dennis Reid Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Director Ray Williams, Don Simpson, Lloyd Coffelt, Bill Soto, and Dick Reese * * * * * * * * * * * Directing General Counsel to draft agreement re conditions relative to annexation of down-coast area to the District Pursuant to the request of the Irvine Company relative to sewerage se.rvice by District No. S for the down-coast area, presently outside of District boundaries, the staff prepared a report outlining five alternatives for providing said service. The staff .reviewed the report and existing and proposed facilities which would be necessary to service the Irvine coastal area between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach. Following review by the Chairman of District policy relative to co-terminus boundaries of District No. S and the City of Newport Beach, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Staff Report, Newport-Irvine Coastal Area Proposed Development and _Sewer Service, dated July 30, 1976, be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That Alternative V of said report be endorsed by the Board of Directors, and that the General Counsel be directed to draft an agree- ment with the Irvine Company incorporating the provisions of Alternate V and the present District policy relative to boundaries, for consideration by the Board at the regular September 8, 1976, meeting. Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:45 p.m., August 12, 1976. 8/12/76 Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California -2- EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, was held on October 27 19 76 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. and a quorum of the Board was reported present. The roll was called Directors present: John Garthe, Chairman, James Sharp and Kerm Rima Directors absent: Ralph Diedrich Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT 1 Reaffirming and ratifying 8/11/76 and 9/8/76 Board actions * * * * * * * * * Moved, seconded and duly carried: That all actions of the Board of Directors of District No. l, acting either jointly with other Districts of the Joint Administra- tive Organization, or individually as District No. l, reflected in the minutes of the regular meetings on August 11, 1976, and September 8, 1976, are hereby reaffirmed and ratified. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute ·entries · on record taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, on the 27th day of October , 19 76 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 19 76 • ~-110 ....,...,li,.""""'-of Directors of on District No. 1 - - - FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RAITT STREET TRUNK COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1976 - - ... - ... ... ... - - - - - - - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RAITT STREET TRUNK for COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 _ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County, California August, 1976 Prepared by Dennis M. Reid County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ... ... - ... - - - - I. Introduction Figure 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS II. Project and Site III. Impacts A. Land B. Air Quality C. Water Quality/Public Health Flora and Fauna Traffic 1 2 3 4-6 7-8 9 9 9 D. E . F. G. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources 10 H. I. Population Public Service Noise IV. Mitigation Measures A. Air Quality Traffic 10 10 10 11 11 B. c. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources 11 V. References VI. Alternatives 12 13 VII. Organizations and Individuals Contacted 14. ... SECTION I INTRODUCTION This Draft Environmental Impact Report is for the proposed Raitt Street Trunk. The Trunk is part of a master plan of interceptor and trunk facilities adopted by the Boards of Directors of County -Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County, California, in November, 1969. The master plans of Districts Nos. 1 and 7 are .... based on land use plans of the cities in the Districts and are designed to fulfill the Districts' needs to the Year 2000. The ... Raitt Street Trunk is designed to intercept all flow from the ... Myrtle Street Trunk, which carries flow from the North Bristol Trunk. This will relieve the Santa Ana and Greenville-Sullivan ... Trunks and service new developments south of Warner Avenue ..,, (Figure 1). This report addresses those subjects specifically required by the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environ-... mental Quality Act. The report follows the format set forth in the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Guidelines . ... .. Also according to established guidelines, this draft is being circulated for review by the responsible agencies and other agencies with jurisdiction. After the review period, a final Environmental Impact Report will be prepared for the proposed project . ... .... 1 . I - -11· 71· ,. l~ I vt•iY OF COSTA MESA ' ' . ~ i I -....,,,, FIGURE 1. .·. i -:-!:. ... _ < .I •' ' ' '' \ : 2. .. ' I /. /. .'/ ,, ,/ •, COUHTY SANITATION DISTRICf BOUl<DARY COUPITY SAHITATION DISTRICT OF O?..\f.Gi COUNTY CXISTISG DISTRICT ltO. I TRUNK SEWERS .. _. .. iilllill-X• PROPOSFO Dl\TRICT NO. I lRullK $£\HRS ·---···· f XISTl.\C s.111 i~ ~~A fRU'IK ~O'll~ Hi SE ~i,QiJIRlO ~one UlC!!iElRIHG COU~IY ~!'HP.l!UH OlSTP.ICl "0 I .... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... SECTION II PROJECT AND SITE The Raitt Trunk, which is located entirely in District No. 7, extends northerly from Sunflower Avenue to Alton Avenue and will serve all land area tributary to the proposed Trunk within Dis- trict No. 7. The Trunk will be located in easements yet to be obtained. Construction of the Trunk will consist of approxi- mately 4,200 feet of 30-inch vitrified clay pipe, together with required manholes and appurtenant work. The Raitt Street Trunk extends along the proposed easement from the Raitt Trunk to Alton Avenue and on Raitt Street to Myrtle Street. Construction of the Trunk will consist of approximately 7,300 feet of 27-inch vitri- fied clay pipe, 3,500 feet of 24-inch vitrified clay pipe, and 2,800 feet of 21-inch vitrified clay pipe, together with required manholes and appurtenant work • The easements that need to be acquired are a strip of land 30- feet wide and approximately 3,100 feet in length, lying in a southerly projection of Raitt Street between Sunflower Avenue and Alton Avenue (2.1± acres) . 3. A. ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... Land SECTION III IMPAcrs The local surrounding area is a mixture of residential, industrial and open space. The open space land has been used for agricultural purposes for many years and is currently growing row crops for conunercial markets. The encroachment of open space for residential and industrial purposes has been very heavy in this area over the past ten years • Pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, some of the open space has been designated as "Prime Agricultural Land" (Figure 2). The designation of Prime Agricultrual Land was made by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California, according to the definition of this land in the Land Conservation Act as follows: (1) All land which qualified for rating as Class I or Class II in the Soil Conservation Service's Land Use Capability classifications . (2) Land which qualified for rating 80 through 100 in the Storie Index Rating . (3) Land which supports livestock used for the pro- duction of food and fiber and which has an annual carrying capacity equivalent to at least one animal unit per acre as defined by the U. S. Department of Agriculture. 4 ' - . ~· - - - .. - _, - -· -· -: - Propose.d .... ......__. • .... • • ,. J • LEGEND gy>{l 2210 PRIME LANDS S.C.S. CLASSt:S 1 & 2 w --URBAN ·~··· ... ....... · izzo POTENTIAL PRIME AGR !CULTURAL LANDS --PROJECTED 1985 URBAN BCUNDARY ~ ~ LANDS GROSSING $200 PER ACRE ~ 2240 ~ ANNUAL CARRYING C~ACITY ONE ANIMAL UNIT PER ACRE PRIME F~GRICULTUP.AL LANDS Figure 2 5. ...:-.1• .. MAY 1974 - .. - - - - - - - - - (4) Land planted with fruit or nut-bearing trees, vines, bushes or crops which have a nonbearing period of less than five years and which will normally return during the commercial bearing period on an annual basis from the production of unprocessed agricultural plant production not less than $200 per acre. (5) Land which has returned from the production of un- processed agricultural plant products an annual gross value of not less than $200 per acre for three of the previous five years. It should be stressed that, according to the Act, the definition of prime agricultural land is fluid and as the needs of the State change so may the definition. The proposed project will provide additional capacity for future development as well as provide relief for the existing overburdened trunk sewer system. The project will remove one of the limitations to future development within existing zoning in the surrounding area and contribute to the loss of open space agricultural land. The total proposed project, except a stretch of 3,100 feet at the southerly end, will be within existing street right-of-way. The southerly end will be impacted to the extent of 2.1± acres during the construction period, at which time agricultural operations will cease until the construction is completed. 6. - - .. - - - - B. Air Quality The air quality of a given location is directly affected by the meteorological characteristics of the surrounding area. Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7, in general, are typified by a "Mediterranean" climate, featuring winters with temperatures ranging from 45°F at night to 65°F during the daytime, and mild summer temperatures of 68°F to 75°F. Typically, winter low temperatures range from 40°F to S0°F and maximum summer temperatures rarely exceed l00°F. The prevailing daytime wind at the project site is from the southwest: during the nighttime hours, the prevailing sea breeze reverses direction so that the wind is from the northeast. Districts Nos. 1 and 7 are located within the South Coast Air Basin, one of the eleven basins designated by the California Air Resources Board. These basins represent areas which meteorologically share a common air mass, and consequently often share common air pollution problems. Unfortunately, these are subject to the same inversion conditions which prevail over most of the basin. These inversions are primarily subsidence inversions during the warm summer months, caused by a marine layer of air that inhibits vertical mixing of pollutants. In addition, radiation inversions are likely to be present in the winter, especially during the early morning hours. 7. - - - - - - .. - - ... - In general, the impact of a project upon air quality is determined by evaluating the sources of air pollutant emissions locally and the increase in air pollutants regionally. In addition, the impact analysis assesses the project's short-term and long-term impact on air quality. Preparing the site for construction produces two sources for air pollutant emissions: (1) Exhaust emission from construction equipment. (2) Dust generated as the result of soil movement. The emissions produced during excavating are of short-term duration and are, therefore, not considered in detail. Con- struction of the proposed development will produce some dust particulate emissions and subsequent distribution of dust that may be troublesome to the residents in adjacent tracts and to construction workers, even though normal prescribed wetting procedures are employed . Although the project itself does not create a significant adverse impact, the cumulative effect of projects in the area will continue to degrade the air quality if measures are not taken to reduce transportation system emissions. Local air quality may have some long-term adverse affect on local residents due to high carbon monoxide concentrations . 8. - - - - .. - - - -...., C. Water Quality/Public Health D. Water quality in the groundwater will not be affected by the proposed project because of rubber gasketed joints in the pipe design which will insure water tight joints. The health of the general public will benefit from this project as the proposed line offers a safe, reliable system and back-up system for Districts Nos. 1 and 7. Sewage flows from the project will be treated at County Sanitation Districts' Treatment Plant No. 1 on Ellis Avenue, in the City of Fountain Valley. Ground water will be encountered in over half of the project length. This will be dealt with either by pumping to the sewer or a storm drain (see Mitigation Measures) . Flora and Fauna The flora of the project site in the southern section is in an area of agricultural productivity. Construction will have a short term impact on this. The project will have no impact on the fauna. E. Traffic Persons who live and travel through the construction area will experience some inconvenience during the construction phase of the project. Once the project is constructed, the general public will not be affected by the projects presence, except for the periodical maintenance required to maintain the proposed facility. 9. - -F. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources ~ The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse impact on these resources. -G. Population The proposed project will provide additional capacity for .... future development. Therefore, the project would induce an -increase in population in the surrounding area. H • Public Service ... Indirectly, through providing capacity for future development, -these areas will also be affected: (1) Fire protection ... (2) Police protection (3) Solid waste collection (4) Domestic water supply -(5) Miscellaneous I. Noise There will be a temporary increase in noise level in the -area during construction. Noise would also generally be expected to increase as development in the area would occur. - - - - 10. - -SECTION IV. MITIGATION MEASURES A. Air Quality -It is likely that dust will be emitted into the air during construction. This will be controlled by proper wetting -techniques. -B. Traffic Local residents and traffic movement will be inconvenienced for the duration of the construction period. Problems of -traffic flow will be mitigated by construction barricades and flagmen. - C. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources It is recommended that a trained archaeological observer -survey the project site. If, in the event that archaeological or paleontological remains are uncovered during excavation, work should be stopped and a qualified expert permitted to -examine the site in order to determine the significance of the discovery. - D. Water Quality -During construction groundwater is expected. The contractor -will have the opportunity of pumping to the storm drain and meeting the discharge requirements of NPDES Permit No. CA0106119 -or pumping into the new sewer as construction progresses. 11. ... 1. SECTION V REFERENCES Boyle Engineering, Engineering Report on Sewerage Facilities for the City of Santa Ana, June, 1965. 2. Boyle Engineering, Engineers Report on County Sanitation District No. 1, November, 1969 3. Boyle Engineering, County Sanitation District No. 1 Facilities -Planning Information, November, 1975 ... .... ... ... ... 4. Ultrasystems, Inc., Bear Street Project EIR, May, 1976 5. Boyle Engineering, EIR Knott Interceptor, County Sanitation District No. 3, July, 1974 6. State of California, Office of Planning and Research, Prime Agricultural Land Report, 1975 12. ... .... .... ... .. ... ..... ADDENDUM SECTION·VI ALTERNATIVES The proposed project is needed to relieve the Santa Ana and Greenville-Sullivan Trunks as well as service new development south of Warner Avenue. A no project alternative would permit capacity deficiencies in the tributary area to worsen causing inconveniences and aesthetic and health burdens to area residents and businesses as well as stopping development in the area . During preliminary design of this project, several alternative routes consistent with the requirements of drainage for the specific area were studied. Items such as project cost, incon- venience to schools, businesses, homes, etc., and traffic flow problems were considered. This route was chosen because of cost and being the least inconvenient over other routes . 13. ADDENDUM -SECTION VII ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS CONTACTED ---~ 14. STATE OF CALIFORNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- -~ 'ff A ANA REGION 6833 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 1 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 -PHONE: (71.4) 684-9330 Q . , .. - ... - .. - - - .. - - July 27, 1976 Mr. Dennis M. Reid, Senior Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Reid: Subject: Draft EIR -Raitt St~ Trunk 0 We feel that this draft environmental impact report has not adequately discussed water quality impacts related to the construction phase and to the growth-inducing impacts of this sewer. The presence of high groundwater in some areas of coastal Orange County has required dewatering with discharges to local surface waters. Are such procedures anticipated for this project? If so, does CSDOC intend to dischBrge these or other construction wastes to its own sewerage system or to local flood control channels? The EIR notes that the project will "remove one of the limitations to future developments", and potentially, impacts due to the associated growth will occur. The effects of the additional sewage flow on the treatment capacity of Plant No, 1 should be discussed. The phasing of the trunk construction should be related to present expansions of the treatment facilities, We feel that the discussion of these impacts should be expanded, particularly an analysis of the relative significance of the accoroodation of population growth in the service area, It would also be worthwhile to discuss the available alternatives, including "no project", since they may affect the degree to which this project will allow for growth, We appreciate the opportunity to review this report, and hope our comments will be worthwhile. Sincerely, I' ·' . \ ·'l A , ~vz,( "' .. 'ct//,,,,..[>~"'- David J. Deckman Environmental Specialist DJD/ps 15. .. .... .... .... .... ... .. ... ... RESPONSE TO REGIONAL BOARD LETTER OF JULY 27, 1976 On page 9 the Water Quality/Public Health paragraph has been expanded to include the groundwater and dewatering problems. The Contractor will have the option of pumping either to the sewer or meeting the discharge requirements of NPDES Permit No. CA0106119 while pumping to a storm drain . With regard to growth inducing impacts, the proposed trunk sewer was designed to transmit flows averaging 8 to 9 cfs, based on the City of Santa Ana's future plan of land use. Direct correlation of capacity to land use if difficult in that proposed trunk will serve both commercial and industrial areas, as well as overflow from other trunk sewers. Adequate capacity is available in the County Sanitation District Treat- ment Plant No. 1 to handle projected design flows . In addition Section V has been added to discuss alternatives, including no growth . 16. - - August 17, 1976 County Sanitation Districts of -Orange County .. - - - - - - - - - P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA, 92708 Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Reid, Senior Engineer Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) -Raitt Street Trunk Gentlemen: The City of Tustin Engineering Department has reviewed the subject draft E.I.R. and has no comments regarding this proposed project. Thank you for the opportunity to review this report. Very truly yours, #~a(;~~ Bob Ledendecker City Engineer BL/dh City Center Centennial at Main Tustin, California 92680 17_ (714) 544-8890 .. - - - - - - - - C. J. SEGERSTROM & SONS 3315 Fairvie·w Road • Costa Mesa. California 92626 Telephone 546-0110 July 23, 1976 Mr. Dennis M . Reid, Senior Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P . 0 . Box 8127 Fountai~ Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Reid: In response to your letter addressed to Segerstrom and Sons, dated .July 21, 1976, we offer the following comments on your proposed "Draft Environ- mental Impact Report -Raitt Street Trunk -County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County, California." Figure 1. (Page 2.) --Your map showing the Raitt Street align- ment should be revised to reflect the true and proper adopted alignment of Raitt Street. Section II, Project and Site. (Page 3) --The statement, "The Raitt Trunk, which is located entirely in District No. 7, extends northerly from Sun- flower Avenue to Alton Avenue and will carry only flow from Di.s- trict No. 1 11 should be corrected to reflect that the Rai. tt Street trunk will serve to sewer all of the land area tributary to the pro- posed Raitt Street trunk within District No. 7, lying between Sun- flower Avenue and Alton Avenue. I have discussed these corrections with Conrad Honer, of Boyle Engineer- ing, this morning and Mr. Honer assures me he will verify these corre.c- tions directly with you. Sincerely, C • .Jj r. E. GERSTROM & SONS ldw_4R~ Henry T .\ Segerstr~m bwt CC: Mr. Conrad Honer Mr. .John Stevens 18. ... - .. - - - - - - - - - RESPONSE TO C. J. SEGERSTROM LETTER OF JULY 23, 1976 The map on page 2 has been changed to reflect the current alignment of the proposed Raitt Street extension and on page 3 the drainage area has been changed to read "will serve all the land area tributary to the proposed trunk within District No. 7 19. - .. - - CITY OF SANT A Al\JA ~. ~ /< ~.{::·;~~; \ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (714) 834-4938 .. ,-I ~ ,. \''\ ~1~~J~.~,.2~:i / 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA • SANTA ANA • CALIFORNIA 92701 July 27, 1976 Mr. Dennis M. Reid Orange County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Reid: SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER The City of Santa Ana Public Works Department has reviewed your draft environmental document for the proposed Raitt Street trunk sewer and has only a couple of comments, both concerning Section II on page 3. 1. In line 8 -Allen Avenue should probably read Alton Avenue. 2. In line 10 -5,900 feet of 20-inch VCP. The map on page 2 does not show any 20-inch pipe but instead shows 24-inch pipe . ._..., Thank you for the opportunity to review this draft report. Sincerely, - J. Richard Smith Special Projects Engineer - ... - - -20. - - .. - - - - RESPONSE TO CITY OF SANTA ANA LETTER OF JULY 27, 1976 On page three, line 8 has been changed to read 11 Alton" Avenue and on line 10 it has been changed to correspond with the present sizing and lengths of pipe to be used. 21. - - - - - - - ... - - July 28, 1976 Mr. Dennis M. Reid County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Draft EIR for the Raitt Street Trunk Dear Mr. Reid: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject EIR, however, since the proposed project will not affect the City of Irvine, we have no comments on the Draft EIR. Sincerely, /;;/~ TOM MINER Planner II MJO:dp Irvine TO'Nn Center. 4201 Campus Drive, P.O. Box DZ, Irvine, California 92664 714/833-3840 22. - - - - - C>F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY H. G. OSBORNE DI RECTOR 811 NORTH BROADWAY SANT.A. ANA, CALIFORNIA AUG 0 6 b1 o Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer County Sanitation District of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn: Mr. Dennis M. Reid Dear Mr. Lewis: TELEPHONE: 834-5678 AREA CODE 714 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 FILE 245 This is in response to a letter dated July 21, 1976 that transmitted the Draft EIR for the Raitt Street Trunk and requested comments prior to August 26, 1976. The Draft EIR has been reviewed and no significant impacts have been noted that relate to the County or its operation. As a point of interest, we noted in the 2nd paragraph on page 3, that easements need to be acquired for a strip of land 30 feet wide and approximately 3100 feet long, lying in a southerly projection of Raitt Street between Sunflower Avenue and Alton Avenue. By coincidence our office is also reviewing a Draft EIR prepared by the City of Santa Ana for the "Construction of Raitt Street from Sunflower Avenue to Alton Avenue". It appears that a potential savings to the taxpayer may be realized if the two projects could be coordinated. Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing the Draft EIR. JEB:mlt cc: City of Santa Ana EMA Development -S ch\\rar ze ESD Project File Reading File Very truly yours, , ~--i ·'. / \ :( -, ' . ' -, ., __ ,, ~~-;-__ / H. G. Osbcrne Director 23. . \.., __ _____ - ... RESPONSE TO Er.'.i.A LE'l'TER OF AUGUST 6, 1976 Whereas the project will be completed prior to the construction of the proposed Raitt Street extension from Sunflower Avenue to Alton Avenue, the project is being coordinated with the City of Santa Ana so that only one Right-of-way acquisition will be needed from C. J. Segerstrom and Sons for the complete street alignment. 24. - .... - . . ... Southern C2Jifomia AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT DISTRICT HEADQUAFHC:R:5 9-li.:> ?'EL.STAR A\iEl•vE ~L. MC'NTE CAL.IF0"1~1A. 917l1 • •213• .C.!J.)9JI /1K',_l)EN,V1$ /-f, /?.£1.lJ ~.v,rµnC',J _J),-.f>r1<1ci5 It'/ Ot:AA/t;c Cotn .. rrf P. 0, I :3t; X '61 :?-7 RivAJT-41N 'WJ.t..LL:. ( (lrf. f,2.Jt1f3 ' Existing Air Q·.t3.li ty in Area __ _ Project ~issio~G: Constr•.:c:ion p!'iase _______ _ Co::i?leted project veh.icula= ____ _ Statio:iary (sa.s and elec::ric po"-1er usage)_ Project !~pact o:i Air Q::.ali;;y _____ _ Adt:iaus.te x NA- r-JA >< }CJ. Yes IJ No 0 Inco-i?lete ){Yes No Pat'tia.ll,y .4v~t1:;-r M, 1':)7t File r:c. C ttJ 72 t-o • I=iad~c1..&:i.te ~ Not re::pirei 0 Require1 IJ B~:ieficial: will probably t~~d to i~pro~e A~ 0 No effect c:i A~ O Z·by be req'Ji red, depe:ids on ulti'.:1ate use .tzl ':fill probably not h2:1e n s:.ibsta"lt.ial adverse effect Cl Adver.::;-?: '.!lay degrade air quality, to a .o;!gni- ficant extent. i) co:~!~.;~s o: ;,~:rc~~:;.:r~3,7 d;/g s&ee/5 mav 6e e,s<if'/,. ~s __ _ f?-q1!irC. '7?<:?nf, 1 Yes If yo·J. h;i.ve a"ly f•.irth~r questions please call ['jC at (213) 443-3931, Ext.23·~ or To11 !bllins at Ext.241 • Very truly yours, J .. A. Stuart Chief Ai~/.~r.ol Officer Alan Kc .... taz~r /~ Se1br Air P;,~ 1.·1~i:i:t rbal:t·s::. :I·~~!, I:~.p?.c ~. A:1:tlJ'.:> i.2 3~·c:i.u:i l . ' (.. e ~1 \.Ir\ L. .l J V I \ I I -~ I j V I I \ I 1 J./ I 11 \ J..• \I I t L _j .. ! _ -I I A IR· CALIFORNIA AIR QUALITY DATA llLtUTANT Anaheim Costa Mesa STANDARDS fORHAT 1o't (G month$) \l0 months) OXIDANT 0 .10 ppm Days l. 6 davs .!_1 d~ (OZONE) 1 hr avg. Hax. 2 • .23 ppm .18 ppm - :T.T~OGEN (11 mo.) (11 months) DIOXIDE· 0.25 ppm Days 11 d~ 3 da1s 1 hr avg. lfax. .50 ppm .35 ppm (N02) -(LL mo.) (S months) l 10 ppm ?.±_days ]l__days ·cAR130:-.l l:~ hr avg. Days. 15 ppm 20 ppm ~mrn:noE -(5 months) I ':n Max. (11 mo.) ppm 9 days Q d.~E (CO) J. hr avg. 27 ppm 31 ppm U.04 ppm ~mo.) SULFU'!"t 1 d~ 0 <lnys /../1 hr nvg. n~~ • 01.3 ppm .026 ppm . DlO:GDF. --·-·-·- 0.50 Mnx. (10 mo.) (502) ppm 0 cl;iys 0 days 1 hr avg. .1/. pnm .13 ppm , ,, I 3 (11 mo.) iUSPENDED ~JU ~1g tn AGH 3 ". 10lug/m3 7L.ug/m3. · AG~ . ~RTICULATE ·-··--111 mo.) LOQ ug /m 3 % over 4 . HATTER .57% 37% ,., .' hr Max. Zli 9ug/m3 177ug/m3 -·~I : avg. --... ---·--·'-• - LEAD l.S u~/m 3 Honths5 · (11 mo.) 1\ rrr I c ULA TE) : ~ \. \ <lny nvg. ----7 months 5 months M[lX. l;:=/7ug/m3 3.99ug/m3 J\ I R P 0 L L U T I 0 N E P I S 0 D E S . Po llutunt ·O s D c .. ,., xic1.:int li lfur io~d<le :l.t·bon 11nn~·:i<l!· - I Criteria 0.20 I o. J.5 I a.so I 0.20 I l10 I 1 ?0 I 1? (i:_pm/time) St~gc Numb or J. hr 1 25 l nr 2 0 1 hr or 1 0 24 hr· 1 hl:' or 'l. 0 . hr I '. 41•1\ ""'V'l.~4 1,1 I-•• I ~ --' ~ 1.-11 __. i.-1 ;___& --1 ·--·· -' -,_ l M 0 N I Ln Hu.bra 68 dD:ys .28 I~pm 16 daE .1~6 ppm (6 months 12 days 15 ppm (6 mo.) 0 days 38 ppm . ·o days .039 ppm 0 days .13 ppm lllug/m3 65 % 220u~/m3 7 months 4.58ug/m3 I ( ,.,, o·R·I NG s T A .. T I o·N S J. .. Cou~ty El Toro Los Santa Ana San Juan Laguna wide Alamitos. Canyon Capistrano Bench l9 months) 56 days 51 days 122 clays 27 days -137 <lnys .19 ppm .21 ppm .33 ppm .18 ppm .33 ppm (4 mo.) (4 mo.) (1 mo.) J clnys 0 <lays --2 day~~ ~days .ltl ppm .16 ppm .35 ppm .50.ppm (S mo.). ( 6 mo.) (9 mo.) 0 d~y_~ ~lay~ --]. days !~8 d:J'.LS '5 ppm 12 ppm 10 ppm 20 ppm \ (5 mo.) (b mo.) (9 mo.) 0 days 0 d.1~ --0 dayn 0 d~vs 8 ppm 19 ppm 16 ppm 38 ppm (7 mo.) · (10 mo) (4 months) 0 days 0 d~ 0 days --ldays .007 ppm .039 ppm .012 ppm • 011 J ppm (7 mo.) (10 mo.) (/• mo.) 0 cbys ·o clays 0 d~R . --0 clay~ .OJ ppm .21 ppm .03 ~12111 .21 ppm (7 mo· 1 (9 mo.~ (9 mo.) (9 mo.) 58ug/m 99ug/m 88 ug/m3 7Jug/m3 -- (7 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.) Hi, 48% .. 49% -15% 43% 12lmg/m3 273ur,/m3 lls up,/m3 l61rnr,/m3 27Jllg/m3 (7 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.) 0 months l• months '• montlrn -li months 7 months 1. 46ur,/m'. 5.85ur,/m3 2~1uid;J 3.3lur-i-;· S:-ffS-ui: /;n~ ... ** Corrected for ultraviolet photometric calibration. 1. Days -Nuinber of days s tnndn1·d equa llcd or exceeded 2. Max. -Highest value over nvcraging time 3. ACM · -Annual Geometric Menn 4. % over -Percent of samples over criterion 5. Months -Number of months ataridard equalled or exceeded (California Ambient Air Quality Standards a1'e not danger Zevelo. These CU'e ZeveZs required to p:roteot puhZia health wi Ni an adcquato mar1ain oj' nafotu.) 5-7-7 6 -·-·· --· ·--... • ' I' (I • --., - l I I I .4 ' I l I t I ' ~ .. _______ ,.. t.'}11 ~.l -' l'OLLUTANT m:ID,\l'iT (OZONE) NITROGEN .DIOXIDE (1':02) FEDERAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS ** 0.03 ppm 1 hr avg. l l lo.05ppm ' DATA FORMAT Anaheim L (6 months) D.:tys 2. 10 days Max. .23 ppm annual ~vg. ·A I R ~ M o N I T . O : ~R 4 I N G S T A •. T I o·· N S Costa Mesa La Habra (10 months: 19 days .18 ppm 83 days .28 ppm .f ~I '. El Toro Los Alamitos 72· days .19 ppm 64 days .21 ppm Snntn Ana Cun yon 135 days .33 ppm Laguna Bench Coun Wid 149 de .33 Pr , annual nvg. ---~-------'--------+~--~--~-~~~----~-~~~~r--~~---r~----~1;----------1-----------r.-------+---------··'I ~11 months: (5 months) (6 months) (5 mo.) (6 months: (9 months) · I '·cARTION ' 9 ppm 5 l O 1 23 <l 0 cl 7 d l d 66 d 3 dnys f c nys nys . -~s __E;J_S --· ~s <1) 1 8 hr nvr; • 7 5 · 16 10 2 MONOXIDE (CO) 35 ppm 1 hr avg. D:i.ys 18 ppm 23 ppm 1 pp1:1 ..2-J?J2_m __ t-__ ._PI_>Tn_-:;------+-----· --l-1'--p;...;p:....m-.-i--3-.:...p.:....pn Max, "11 months; (5 months) (6 months) (5 mo.) (6 months. (9 months 1 Q__dnys 0 days 1 dny 0 clays 0 days --0 dnvs ~ 27 ppm 31 ppm 38 ppm 8 ppm 19 ppm 16 ppm 38 pr I._. -----·--·------~-----f·-_;...;;.__-+-(-l-O-n-10_1;._1t_h_s~)-t------r-:-(-7-1-:10-.-:'.)-t-:(~O-m-o-. )~-t--:--(l~• _rn_o_n_t~h-s-:-)-i-----~----~---- 0 .14 ppm Days Q clays _Q__j_~ 0 dnys .9 days 0 days_ 0 days SULFUR DIOXIDE 24 hr nvg • Mux • . 043 ppm • 026 ppm · • 039 ppm • 007 ppm • 039 ppm • 012 ppm 0.03 ppm annunl I (SO~) l -annun 1 av~. nvg. ,~~~--·~--~~-~------+-------.__ ______ 1--------t-------f-----~-~----t---------1------·----- I 75 ug/m3 3,· 3 (11 months) (7 mo.) (9 months: (9 months) (9 mon5hs SUSPt:NDED AGM 3. AGM lOlug/m 74ug/m3 lllug/ml 58ug/~n3 99ug/m3 88 ug/m3 -173ug/m HATTER PARTICLJI_.An.: --·-·-----i-----t.------+------t-----+----1-----1------t------t-:-:-----1--- ._,60 ug/m3 ··1 0 over4. 0 (1% 0 1 months) (7 mo.) (9 months: (9 months: (9 months 1 /r Q% 0% 0%. , 2% · '' 0% -0% Q • J% 2!1-hr nvg • Max• 249ug/m3 l 77ug/m3 220ug/rn3 124ug/m3 273ug/m3 218ug/m3 · 164ug/m3 273ur,/ .____~-~~~1~--~~--~~~---~~__._~--~---__;,;_;_ ____ , ___ ..;;.... ___ ,~~___;;.,_~t~~..;_~-t-~--..;;._---r----------i---~---1------ 1 \1rtnROC.ARnm:s 0.24ppm D.:lys (5months) (6mo.) (6.months (7mo. I ( COR!U~CTED 3 hr nvg. Mo.x. _:111 days --66 dnys 98 days ---169 <la FOR }~ETHA~~l·:: (6-9 a.m.) 6 ppm 2 ppm 6 ppm 6 ppm A I R P 0 L L U T I 0 N E P I S 0 D E S --11 0 llutun t Criterin (ppm/ time) Stage !lt1mbcr 0.20 I 1 hr 1 25 Ox 1d.:i1·, t i.---· 7 2 0.35 l ht" 0 Sulfo~~ o.so I 1 hr or 1 0 Dioxide 0.20 I 24 hr ' ~--:1rbo:1 40 I 1 ht' or· 1 0 )nr··:'.' ,'. , /0 I 1? hr I I 1. Daya·-Number of days standard exceeded 2. Max. ~ Highest value over averaging t1me 3·. AGM -Annual Geometric Hean 4. % over ... Percent of samples over criterion · (Fede:riaZ Ambient Air Quality Standards are not dangel' , ~level~~ 2~eae are levels. required to proteot publio health .with ~!~ adequate margin of oaf ety.) **' Corr~ctcd for ultraviolet photometric calibration .. 5·-7-}6'· I t REL JWS REL 7/27/76 MEMO TO: JWS, FAH, REL, WNC, TLW FROM: RITA Documents, correspondence, etc. needed to complete pending resolutions and files: Legal Description and Map re condemnation Resolution No. 75-143-2 for Contracts 2-14-4 and 2-14-5 (approved 10/1/75) (If no condemP..ationsrequired, need memo to attach to resolution indicating this.) Irvine Ranch Water District agreement re local sewer collection system within 176-acre area excluded from Annexation No. 39 (Resolution No. 75-94-7 approved 6/11/75) Agreement with Security Health Plan re Specification No. I-010, HMO Prepaid Medical Insurance Plan (approved 2/11/76) Legal Description and Map re condemnation Resolution No. 76-36-3 for Contract No. 3-21-2 (approved 2/11/76) (If no condemnations required, need memo to attach to resolution indicating this.) WNC/_ Exhibit "A" (map) to agreement with Southern California Edison Company re transfer Q~~~~fl.!.1~,-~.;~~p~~s~ 1?wer Line. Also need Bill of Sale. (Reso. 76-54 a?proved 4/14/76) ,/'--FAfl/''.-Agreement wl:th-SCAG ~e participation in 208 Area-Wide Planning for South Coast Area 1 \, TLW . (Resolution No. 76-59 approved 4/14/76) ' _-/ --mfc/ 0&reement with Orange County Vector Control District re pilot production of -~. mosquitofish at Plant No. 1 (approved 4/14/76) · (RELF' Amendment to J. B. Gilbert & Associates agreement for EIS re Treatment Plant ~J'~_ ... ./ Facilities Plan (Resolution No. 76-92 approved 5/12/76) ~~ ~~_./· Am~/~j;~~ }~cN~=-~ ~~_:~~~~,re JPL-ACTS Process (Resolution No. 76-98 approved REL REL REL REL REL REL Memo advising which jobs Resolution No. 76-93 determining prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors was posted at Executed Grant of Easement from Calprop Corporation re Contract No. 2-16-2 (Resolution No. 76-107-2 approved 6/9/76) Exhibit "B"s (8~ x 11" Ja3;ps) for Grant of Easement resolutions from: / ,~··lf\ vFr_ank Vessel, Jr., et al. re 3-21-2 (Resolution No. 76-118-3 approved 7/14/76) .\ ~nrietta Visbeek re 3-21-2 (Resolution No. 76-119-3 approved 7/14/76) ~ter to Rewes-Schock re emergency repairs to Interplant. Influent Interceptor, Job No. I-8 (proposal accepted 7/14/76) ·: _ C.::>~l _t•_._'r ,.'(.~-.. -~\.. t= ,,,7~ ~ ,j Plans and Specs for Odor Control Blower for Diversion & Metering Structure (Phase I), Plant No. 1, Specification No. PW-055 (Need to advertise and then will need award recorn.11E:t ,,. ·:: .1. C!': ... , _ . Plans and Specs for Installation of Knott Interceptor and Ellis Tru:1k Sewer Int~r­ connectio11, Specification No. PW-056 (Need to advertise and then will need award recommendation frcm General Manager) •... --.. JNS ~ FAH/ JWS REL REL -----·--~ --~.. .u~ Letter to NIWA transmitting Resolution No. 76-130-5 and District No. S's share of 1976-77 budget--$5,000 (approved 7/14/76) :-Amendment to NIWA agreement providing option for each member agency to appoint a second alternate to Board of Directors. (Resolution No. 76-124-5 approved 7/14/76) -'~ <..~_..._,._..~ •.,...:.'., .i((.._.-'"'-~'\.Y"'<........_.._I-_,,._(_~..,.•_::.· .... ~ \,.'t'T_"_~·, r'· ;,,,·_ (" r_--.·-• \.-... ·\ Letter to City of Brea/Chino Basin Municipal Water District re participation of District No. 2 as lead agency in obtaining a Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and EIR re Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drair:age area. (approved 7/14/76) Letters soliciting engineering proposals re Feasibility Report and EIR for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon area (authorized 7/14/76) -· '-._,._> .... • .... :' • JWS Letter to LAFC transmitting Resolution No. 76-131-7 authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 55 -Ridgeline/Lazy B Annexation to District No. 7, and transmitting other necessary information and fees. (approved 7/14/76) ~~\-\I. I q? ([. :t~~~ _.._,_\° ~ ' ~ S i.: ''-"-i;,__ . --~·-<--c; ~_:.,__ .;:i\(C. -v--\c <l cf a ... -'-'-'"'""-~ 1.--u. 3 · ..) I , < ~---~=-. f l~\--;_, .. ~\r l.'-1 r~ Ii-'o, -~ --\::\.&.~ Lt"-._ ··c LL~\(_•<'-"~\ ~r ""- ~ \._ (-'t~ ... ~-tu/ DC[\:."> X~lllli~•~'--' 1 ' " v LA/ D \\ !\ l*\ Lee_,,~. v Q,~.,,.S) . .>.r<-.I<-.-.-\r-·to /\.Jt\~)>. \XJ<x·•·",,,J' ~-15, ~-c~ L--- ()... 0 ...... ,,,,_. ot \ .. ~ .. ~"~~-'~·-~ ... L~~-..\--~ ~ ._ ~:_ ~r-~y...-\r ;.._;;_ r ·7_:;-1 ~<...;;~ 1.-V<.>-"2.~~...-'\....<__. \,j ~ • i . -~@) :. ~l..r ~t~~S\_ND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITIONS AND REMODEL -JOB NO. J-7-3 In August, 1975, the Building Committee was appointed to study oc,.} ·(-~{'.I l rA),-< r ;· en7t1.c.R (7.jf,~·'.' :.,~t_.vti-.t-<;-t-·4--' the currerit,A.nbeds of -\:he Distriet:~·relative to possible enlargement of the Board Room, comeletion of the second floor of the -'({\. A,W<-tfA ' tl ' ' • (' l.A.J""VV' t.. Engineerin_g ,.Building and additional office space in the Admini s- ·~ ~~0 l.t., ~~ Jr-y tration Buiteing. After se~eral me~~4:>e~wee.n the staf~ and J,,. ' ~{_,, ~ the .J3u~ lding Coijlffii t tee~ ~h~~rnd }J>y ~. )lorman Culver! the £.:i.ncrT /t~J.,~~--J ~J..v.., P OJ-//c1, .. fwl f ~ f~ {~..,~ Ql·W .. QODG@pt ~-pre5€mt'5d··· td lt}2g·{.·.~.&re9tors __ at th~ir ~' 197.6 :cs .~a .;v.J ~ ,;t;/j t..Jfa-. ~t ·vu--_,./ ,,../-.. "11 '-r~.I . ~et in g . I\ Th~ f i na 1 concept , ~-:!!W..._.,~_U!i°""""~l,l.~.e=a::::br= ... ::i:. :(ty';8'· :-:·tl="fih'.0e-~"TiLJr+t..,.r~ene•!!•~!'l"':rs~s~, has approximately 3500 squ~re feet of useable area in the building which includes increasing the Board Room from 1140 square feet to 1800 square Jeet. This project ~"s'~~~}~e 1976-77 L---\t-. ~.J- budget €l.:t $300,000. It is recommended that ~ bids be received f.or this prgjoct on/October 12, 1976, with possible award at the October Board Meeting. Construction could hP scheduled to ~-j;7- cornmence November 1, 1976 with completion1in1May, 1977. \ C-QNS!DfaoTIQtJ OF AWARD OF SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053, PURCHASE OF THIRTY-TWO (32) DIGESTER DOME HANGERS Bids for the purchase of 32 digester~ome hangers,were received on August 31, 1976. Three bids were ~ranging from ,,ai low of $15,508 to a high of $17,280. It is recommended that~ award be made to Production Steel Co., Inc. of Carson, Cal ifornia{tr the low bid amount of $15,508 for al_l i terns contained i ~ the proposal ;f, (,._ ,.,._,_, / t r rn·IA.<>~ ~IA,· ~-¥-cl),lU-.)e tL .{.i ...... ~ e...v..e ,,4_.;~~' I ru \_) 0 ~ ' J.;.v"~ u 'Phis tteltl appearing Oft-'fou:i; agenda ist apf'±ova'l--ef. Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for Job No. J-6-lD, Addi ional Pumping Facilities for the Foster Outfall Booster Stat· Plant No. 2-'il?!ke8c iailienda change the bid date from A gust 31 to September 7th to allow additional time for t~con ractors to prepare their bid w ~' (f ti :'1~-G proposil)apd}several technical c arifications which were ~~:tea b~he prospective bid ers since the project was advertised. A~aff recorrunends ap roval of these addenda. NOS. 1 and 2 TO SPECIFICATION NO. for th& co~tractors to preparQ technical clarifications ~~~~~~ approval of these addenda. by the prospective recommends )(~ CHANGE ORDERATO{PW-047 ·Jb6~- \J This change order is to extend the contract time 35-days. The contractor obtained and construct new molds for this project which included new fiberglass du work at Headworks "C" ventilation syst~lant No. 2. The e new molds enabled the_cop~~actor to merQ easily comply with the job specifications . P.··11'"'• and/to produce a better quality of duct work than required.( r,t ..J--d rd ,,~ &-..I rl ,,.J. . • /~L,u_~ ) Staff recommends acceptance of this c ange order~extending the ) original contract time f rorn 180 days to 215 days /.P( j"b I,. \to. 0-? C,V.r,1 l C ,i Accept~-)ff'~PW-04 7 ~ Fieer13la~~ 0-u?:t liiprk: tor Headwo:r:-ks "C" ir§Sh .... ,IA..~ A.i.r Vent j lation--Sys·tem .f' ) le l I r;+~;~~., The contractor~has satisfactorily completed all the specified work ! for this project and has complied with al.1 the contract requirements. StaffArecommends acceptance of this joQ,.1 ~-action appearing ~ ~ . ' on yue"dl: a.gend.aJt authorizes '~ filing of· the Notice of Completion-OA..--'2 ~d~'. ,. ,{! ~ -;;ti" !'Ju: i ~,ri.. -I !-, w , , .// / / ' ~\AJ CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO/PW-052 At the August Board Meeting,fcontract was awarded to Instrumentation and Mechanical Systems, Inc. of Fullerton for ttre installation of -fk~ I seven automatic gate operators atAPlant No. 1 Diversion and Metering Structure. The contract, in the amount of $22,688, is a small contract anfuthe staff inadvertently included in the specifica- tions for this~~~~J,.11Jance requirements in the amount of $3 million IA_v:; which are the limii:;s ~or a majo~11 contract. The contractor .\_,,,,5,r~.-t._,J;:i / c--•• _,J..t<.,.<-~' ·· _d . A ty:A, f(~-<.htt ~ · , ~---~ /s~d his hid based ~6n Supply~ -efl:eBermal $1 million /J . .J //_. AA. .(I ,4'{.• ~ . 'i.J i ns 1 irancQ ;r;Q'!lairQmeai: fer a j ee of this magnitilci~·r-t.he£-erore, -i-t -:tt.R. is tAQ staff's recomrnendafion that t~ change order be approved ...at no cost to the n; stl;ict.s to reduc~t'.he arsom:i-t:. o! insurance ~'9:/- required~from'--$3 million to $1 million. #'~ ACCEPTANC:~ ~JOB NO. J-9-2 I This ~~aet to provide for 1 an extension of .B'brge ~er Jdi.2 on (t1 U/.l A,,~...i "'" ' the 120" ocean outfall ~e:::f"" eomplete. 'fhe SC;lAtractor :Ra.• ~ '4.-<.-<-e" -l ~ . , (._ ~-"-,, e.I completed 1'all the requirements ~ the contract and staff recommends acceptance of 'this project. The action appearing in the agenda authorizes the acceptance of the job)a:H-d filing of the Notice of Completion ~ . ~ (;, , c J{~A ?/t '-/J ~ c... ~ \ ATTENDANCE AT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS goNGRESS AND EQUIPMENT ~ ~ International Public (} Lt·,.lr • , . -t, I -C • • {}>)' r ;· . · -· '-1nterest1ng 1sess1ons along .:L, \ .. ~'"' ~have proved t~.--b.~-----~~!_:emely valuabl to t:.!?-.~ Districts in planning -----·--. ··-----~--.. -... ~,.··-·--·-··--_... ·--:;:,;;-;· .. :,r ~ for future construction programsr~ he Dlstricts'.Chief Engineer has b~eH attend~t~se:c:~tti~~~~in the past, as well as fr, ~ti? A--li l.c,c,f/ ; a SHOW A!l' LltS VEGAS, SEPTEMBER 2 6 -30 • / u U,w.i C< , I L-~ lJi i;. {~/ 'E:_'; ~ <) l ....-r-,, '~f Works Confe nceAhas sche~~led several wi thtmanuf acturersl'~·j'bi ts, whi~{J.J...v. ...-· i). Civil Engineers11 It is j~ _,.(_ ~J(l_._ C( { ) c .. 1J~ recommended that the Boards ~14!fl~~·~ ~he Joint ~ha;Fman and if ) ~(( r<.. ~J'.~,..._\CAA./;pLcc..,-1 meetings of the Chief Engineer_~tteDd -m~~'E.~S--SiR.ge-~~protr;i,de'\:. .-~:~ 'an excellent forum for discussi ~ ' ~ e ~~ :; \: .,_ ~· .-:.~..-~ -k' ' -~~ ~? ~ j -· , ,..,,, ..... ":. ~ ~ r """'.-=:::::::' (-·~ . .,.. ~· '!"'. ('\ ;.,. I ~ I ~ ,z{.'l'L .- Authorization to Negotiate1Purchase of IUse~· S~±~~~e~9ffe--i1~Ja::mu~l~i""Ang Trucks~~~ / (J i l ; Included in this year's budget is $350,0QO for solids handling I and disposal equipment. A portion of t~is budget amount was I anticipated to be used for dump traile1is and tractors for hauling of centrifuge sludge to dryinJ areas at both Plant ,1si ,i:es. 11 •eA a-e/c.mall dump trl..Auc' Ovs',o..AC/la<n1.tdL~t,,h.t.ety•··(··.'1..<.;J,,.. /} 'F-t:Yfi~ee--ee~x:'li:1:S>1Lt::1~· Il'tt<:Jg-ee~qf-\U~ii.:tp::l.lmmee.on.tt~b~Q~l:l:1° BR-g~"tlu~ol"e'f:aH-~:r. ~1 :tt 11 f are rapidly approaching the end of their useful life. l In an attempt to find equipment ~~·g--be suitable for hauling J of wet centrate sludge, ,which contains approximately 80% water, the ~/\J.) I'.' . • ... Jo '.J, 7-f I staff has ~ried ~~(al methods which included dump trailers, dump trucks, ;.~·,-~,~·~l~~~-:~.~;~,fx concrete trucks. This latter method/proved so successful that the staff is recommending the purchase of two used eight:yard transit mix concrete trucks for the ' purpose of handling the c.enti:-~te sludge at both Plants. ~e staff I ~~lecated1'hree sources of lsu~ply/that specialize in this type of ~-·"t l .. ,_,, te-ht,.,'. used equipmentf1and~~ extimateti that the cost will not exceed (.A ,'---J;.., ... $ 9, 0 0 0 per unit ,1 e,Jf-cius-iv~of applic~ble sales tax. _ ~.;~.~~;. f.~h~re, recommended that the Gener:al Manager be authorized to,Aawa-rd. a pu~chase . 'V /J A I 4 /) ~1 ,· "'oraer for two used eigh t·-yard transit mix truck st\ in an amount not to exceed $18,000 plus applicable sales and use taxesr ~1:1 ·1~.- eoNSIDERAtioN<OF ACTIONS RB~ PURCHASE OF ATOMIC ABSORPTION .' SPECTROPHOTOMETER / / tU ~i l-,, ·tL . A Included in the 1976-77 Budget'\~, '~purchase of an A.:tomic ,;r _ ~ ~sorption ,lepctroph,, otolj\eter. for usi by the laboratory~"'" i!.'-' Ai.A-i ~ wrr~t.f / implemen~--1industrial waste monitoring program . .i:-R an amount '"'f.A~~e s~< . Qf $g,§40. Our presentlatomi~absorption spectrophotometer was manufactured by Perkin-Elmer Corp. of Santa Ana,'fMQa1l JQi)a 'IliJlie-laboratory personnel ~ave evaluated several comparable instrurne~ts and have determined that ~he P~fkin-Elmef ~1fde~ 307-~ ~.lr ~ ~l.~'t .J j,-tr:4vJ'fL,,f W-.At.t I will \f±±O~a greater fle~~_!Vland/i~~~-l~Hy of u component,~·a~ i11Strumen.t. i_n_:t_his pdce __ .i:~~g~? This additional i..nf9trument will allow the laben?a-i=m:=y 13eroennQl to analy~~ heavy metal_s a:r:dAtoxi~ contam.\nents in the industrial ...-1,..,·'-, ~ \-,_ ""'~it . .e-. , (...(,"-.t:t;' ~.fn~c.,t.A. t , e. ... t f waste te-ai de j n the i mpl emept~;R. of the Indus_v ial Waste Ordinance. Our present atomic absorJ?t{on ~s used principally /~(--~'-f .... l) for monitoring the wastewaters~iift ~NPDES Permit requirements. It is, therefore,, reco. mrq, e_ nd$ that the General Manager be authorized 1 ,... r .. ·. -~ . ~ W"--VI e '· ft 1 ,~ r: ' ,• ' 1 ._ . l> -Eo i=ie13etia L6 the p. ~r~fiaB~J°f tft.io ins~rnment. wi'&h lerkin-Elmer Co, rp fr:. ~t ,_H~ .... t,-<..e, i ~ ~ .J.....J 30'7'4 at;.v.A..: a ~! . _,,--·l'c:~ · i P e..c-/_ . , of Santa Ana l<Y'f ~~~mount~~t to exceoQ $8, 500 plus applicable /' ,~, sales and use taxes and freight charges. ~~: I ~ . r :i I l f -·_ .,_ f. __ f_,... f •. ' -.. . \. \.lo I PURCHAS.E OF IN-SEWER SAMPLERS FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE MONITORING PROGRAM The staff.has evaluated several commercially available wastewater samplers which can be installed in 1sewers for the purpose of monitoring the sewer system and the industrial waste contained / therein. After a thorough evaluation, it is recommended that the staff be authorized to negotiate with ISCO, Environmental Division of Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of purchasing ~. .f..c ,t4.-11-·~" , ~. ~t.J .• i.~ , .f'~ : ( o-i .. w ( . eleven wastewater samplers_,~or a maximum amoynt not to~exceed /I '.! '."'L ' ·,. ; ~r'\,A.·'-fl"Jl ( t ( ,' $15,000, exclusive of tax and freight.( Approximately $16,5,.00 ('-f ?·<.AA..-·.,)' b--. was budgeted this year for samplers and flow meters ~ the r .'l"\I , . , ·~"'t ... t·:· ..... Industrial Waste JJo~artlftertt-'fkse S&lf(~loi;a a.re rQq11 i reQ-to ~L '\t&.X·.1 implement ou:t/~ industrial waste monitoring program. No . 8 -m -Authoriz·i ·ng· Pur'ch'a·s·e· o·r Emer·g·e·n·cy Bypass ·piping. Included in the approved1"7 6r77 budglt, is an item in the I amount of $4,427 for purchase o f 12-inch aluminum pipe and couplings for use in temporary emergency bypass operations . Our purchasing division has solicite for said piping and determined that only one source of supply is available for said piping which is compatible w~th our existing equipment . It is therefore recommended thaj the Manager be authorized to issue a Purchase Order to Po~~ Irrigation Equipment Company ~cquisition of approxima,ely 600 feet of 12 -inch aluminum (. pipe and couplings for emerrency .byp ~n the amo;;nt-of $4' 964. 97 . -\~~ --- ,;"v (~ r J AUTHORIZING I INCREASE IN SALARY /FOR CHIEF OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE Mr. John Thomas, Chief of the Industrial Waste S ec tion, has recent ly received notification that he has successfully passed the State examination for r e gistration in civil engineering . In recognition of this accomplishment, we are recommend ing that Mr . Thomas be granted a 1/2 step increase in salary . This 1 ~ re comme ndation is consistent '.-t{j.h ~~ion for other members of the Eng ineering Department who have successfully pas sed this This action appearin ~on your '\. Cd ~ c_ ~ 0-""3. /y -;; 1Ci 13 ) ag e nda reclassifies Mr. Thomas' posi t i~n from Range .9J,.A Ato 1 Range '°t4(I-ip-r1 ,.Juf YI-v7 ) p/r ¥_,_J,.,__ I "IV., f ~ h State registration exa mination. I Y L b 'J ~ \ ~ j I L~ -. -~ -1' i t t t t-~' -... --. l -+---1 tJ 1 l __ ·--t)·(lPv( , : ,:_) _J.·-~ D ~ r' _, Iii -~ _J _ --~--~-! ~, ·--r 1 1 I 9t/" · ft c 1 •?.. :~v ~-,~ i/JiFl!J 1 1 "'VYY>~ ~ "' 0 _ ' 1 _j__J_ ~ __, . l -' t + .. l--L 1--r-I --l I t- i I I I I I I I I I br~~~U??. ,J:'")r1 1 11 ~(v tr) -~??) ~ ) '7 ""Mi '!'?-1 P>yt>-~ i ,~ :M[ -----L . \ j /j f l T ---o+--t-r -l + -t -T " -H '~ I I k ' I I I . . ) I I I /J I trtl ii r -. . 0'1,1'1r77W j -~j/-~~?J 1~t'.1J.?if-YPp~ ff 1 ~1 .iµ,M--~JG .,·irr-tr: ~ 1 ._ -~ --/ t7 ·.,£-· I . I r l ·'~~-i~r~ ~2..,~~p--1-·-i . ('~ ---1 .. ~ t to -• -, -+ Y .. I ,j , 1 --+-j _ t-::;+ I I : : ,1 I I ', ' I I I J . I fi··~~ ~'~-1#,? / {l~,_,:u;f~r '._iJ J.,,,Ol l " '.', · •, ~,,1;2 f + 1 t--t -+ -! . j. -A r +;I ~ + ---• t-~--l...., n JP -~ r ,, t • t I' ! : /) · ' ~ "Iv · I ' 1 I ' I ~~, 'i""i?.Y ~ / '?·~...,. ~ VFJ1 11" t::i . ·I~'. '.t"' I?': ; ..,,.,,, r-1711 · t + . f) ---I • _.l I 1 l ,~ r ~ .. ;,..,_ J : .,-J-...;o I ~ & w ,,,,g>-?P;i:> ~ ,..,.,,,,-Jl?',J/ ·:1>~~ ~ r \J *t ·1 t / . l .. I .' • • • 117 L !; y /7 , • • t __ + r . yf ~;'.:+__r,r.,,.,,,,Ji.P +b~ f A'iJi?-J]~.7 ~/{(Jfr/1 v ~ ,,)~ 11· · 1-t t 7 . t l • + 1--1 r:.. II 1 G ;./ .,I . ,.. c?\ -d ') 1 ~~ t II' I • I 1,1 f l \ :>~I:;.: . -z,..{ '(./ $ -v -_... I "110 I x..,.,,, \Y'""';1'./ ~Jf' -h41 r~~1r; ?·i~ r,:;J•>J?J77 <~'Pi·"' ..,n )+;,i i!f / I if' --..'7fj • • l j • (' :& 'I' e ';' -~J. I d. I • V'·'/ · I I • ~ ;,,;)17 'i "'l (I t7 -/t..O ~ ' ' I I n-. u ,~.,~,,,o/ ~ ; ('1_{)/'I 71;,i ~ -~ 6./>PJ ~·f't'?1 ·• -~ ~•-·-L ·-.~ . J -"C.V °' 1 . ·It . -¥ ' i . I I : I ' ' ?. I I ~ I r I + .. f I l . -t -T t • l . . !. ~ + • -.. • t ~-I I ' I I I I I : I t . .. + + ·: 1 ~ I • l ! + ... + .. ~--;J..;\ .,.?A1 j ~ -T -' · 1 , -. rt?-. -. : t I , , -r--o : -. ' . . ! 1 ll. ·u:-'j-:I-ft -i . i r .... q.,u· :n-+v·{l~/) :~ ,..,/._ ~ (:."'-'i/ J.-:' f?J ' ,,i;f-1i,.,-y1;,,1.J.073V I + -'T -i r/ ... f ~ I t I . I 1 JI ; ~ . ~ ''Y)f'f'J " +. il . ---il u ~ ' I -~ I I : I ~f! . , I ~, I . -.'::;--~-r"Yn/ J-\1/:J "»-:n"J·,ii~tP~i'I??. 4.'l f?ji 7~--;p;j ~I,> +-,--, , ~ °"Y'Y' . r . . \ . ·1 Y ' ,, 1~ ?-~" . ..,,...o~'# • I , r • .. ~ • l /7 ~· -t . ;-1 -• r ·1111'~'/1~~1~ P.'~r ~. r-if1'r:~~:~'T4t~-t 71 ¥ ~;,r ~~J).! 1?' "/' ) -,. 1 !)~ • .,-h ·-~~-..,..""""~ ;t· -:[--i ~~ l I I . I ~, r 'r.11/ 7f1 /_ • I ····vv -f~")V;,,, ... -,.1 ~ v ••• ..,..,17''-'l'I j . I\ ! " • • · , ,~,.JI --·-~ T t l : ? + -tr -r t · 1 . I • . t : t ~ I -I~. -1 . . ~ 1 , 1 Y. . . 1 I -.-7-~ I j 1 :?'l.. 1 r , f t ¥-, 1 · 1 j :dr~ 'pn -fu~ I ~ .f ··.r MnL -<?? ·ifJf' r--~~I ~ ~ v. . -r r I · i tr~ jf, ff ~ Yr' r r . ! -.. .' 7 - I I I j I I ' I --~~wt:;~-. )~ l u~·-?<ir ~~· . ~ -~~--/, ~ fi~ 1£7J... ~ J --,,.,. . ,. I '/. , 'i .. '1 •??'1 i ~,' n--J. ' ~ • 1 } If • ' I ~l=lj ~ l r /' /J ~ -~ -T -:.! --. l -' .. -' -r ., • ~I -I --L_ . - I I ' I I I I I , • .... -~ t .j. -r-_J +---~ + .. I ' • _J --; ~ ~ . I -+ _J_ -+-L-1 t r-·r--:---+-I I -I ' I I I I I • _,_s:~ 1 ~/.-'-v;::tls~J.-J~ 1 .rv~~u ·i>'tf-f'ir9~ ~ O/>"Z? · ~M ' -.t-~.-=?0~91 (r€) 3 · : • ---4 ---· -r t ----~ -.. -L ~ -t---J_ -t-. -r l -1' . ·-I ~ 4 1 -.-. , I '. I j_ --l _ ~ '. : -1 --I -L I -. I l l ~ I J j '. ! ! I I l -l I I I - -t-• I -t 1 _I I t- j t I -1----------4--'---· • t-l I J I ~ t- I j l i----+ I I I t 1 L I I .. l ~ ·-,- I-_j .._ +----+--- r ~ L I J_ }--t I I . I I I I I I I I I 1 I .. I • "l I I I I I I I I 1 . t I I I l --- I~ l -I i I I I J I ~ I f I I + t I + - + + I 1 t I J t-1 t-j t- I I L I I I -·--.-~ • ---r--I . +-t I I • I I l I 1 l lu ~ '+ ~l.(_ ~A-~' t;''d~ J~,t- (1.-L- ACCEPTING GRAN T t OF EASEMENT FROM ERNEST BRYANT E'l' AL RB~G 2-14-4 a.nQ.~4=5 SAN TA ANA RIVER INTE RCEPTOR r eti-1A .. t{.[I:., 1 -1{'1.j ~/."J,,-lf'J The District's staff, consulting engineer and General Counse l, wo rk i ng within the guide lines of the appraisal prepar e d for t he Santa Ana River Interce ptor, have conclud~d the n egotiations for the ri gh t of way for th e permanent and temporary easement s fo r the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Yorba Reg iona l Park to the Green River Golf Course (SAVI Pre~er~J4-The permanent easeme nt is 30 ' in width an.Q. a pG,t:.t,.;i..G-H-e·:E-4::-lTe-e@&t-e-~h-is .4e...:P property ow ner for the -removal and l oss of production of b'6.-~ citrus trees , ~.Gi-J?e&-i:-&Fa.-t!-~e n <::lf~i~f;'i.g.a;t ioR-:f"-a:c i :I:± ties~ aQd other etls.i;--:b-R'f3 -impro~frts ·, in addition to the compensation for the temporary use of the construction easement and the permanent use of the sewer easement. . () .J.1 r-t_ tJ µ,1-Jt . t· } !J_, Or u_~, r-zJ ~ v~ °"'{( .,,, ,.y . U' ~ c.. ~taff recommendsf' acceptance of t.h .hs_., Grant of Easement and A paymeo~~;t'; t..f')-,c ~ D :Ki~ the J?emnei;i.t.....and-i?em~~-a-s-em~s- ~1 a (t c ( t" , .. 1r I _. set forth in 'Ghe doc4:tme~prepared j and approved by Genera l Couns e l. I / ri Li~{J-)~) ~ \)~ CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 7 , B, 9 and 10 TO CONTRACT NO. 2 -14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR ~ These four change orders conclude the additional work ,~odifications to the specifications for ~completion of this major reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor which extends from La Palma Avenue and Imperia l Highway to Gypsum Canyon. Change Order No . 7 , in the amount of $1 ,423.82 , is for waterline utility interferance and for the relocation of three manholes as requested by the Yorba Linda County Water District to better accommodate future connect i ons anticipated to serve their local ~;~ 9! sewer system. Change Order No . 8 , in the amount of $8·, 320 , is for/re~tal costs sustained by the contractor as a result of delays i{~oordinati cllifl ~cheduling of the contract work for the Yorba Reg i ona l Park and this Reach of the Santa :·Ana River Interceptor . The District's contractor was directed to proceed on a basis of a proposed schedule by the County 's Environmental Management Agency which, because of circumstances beyond the control of t he EMA, they were unable to meet. The cost of this extra work is for standby of the rental equ i pment n ecessary to construct the interceptor through the Yorba Regional Park . ~ ~ ~~ 6 b,~u LrJI Change Order No . 9 is for additional costs ~incu rred by the contractor while boring at the intersectio n of La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway because of encountering a low sewer of the City of Anaheim which was constructed to a grade different than what was shown on the as -built plans of the City ,~f ARaheim . Change Order No. 10 is the normal change order for the adjustment of the engineer's quantities of the actual work performed. This change order is for a net deduction in: the amount of $2,953. o/It should be noted that all change orders /have been approved I / by the State and that the grant program will pay their proportionate share of this additional cost. ~~t~l change orders for this project are in the amount of approximately $79,574 which is less than 2/10 of 1% of the original contr~ct price. Staff recommends acceptance of these change orders, tptaring a net ad~·~he K? contract of $13,598ft. I This contract for the installation of the Santa Ana River I Interceptor from the intersec,tion of La Palma A~en ~ anc:t-nn Highway , which spans a distance of approximate] J-G.61-'10 +1 ""'-"----- ·feet is complete and the contractor has complied wil:h-a-~1~~-- / provisions of the contract . r ork has been inspected by the District 's staff and consulting engineer and all requirements of the affected property owners/ (Ernest Bryant, et al; Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company; f i ty of Anaheim) have been met. The contractor has diligently prosecuted the work and has completed this contract 142 days aheah of schedule . The State Water Resources Control Board ha / inspected this i nstallation during the course of construction and has verbally commended the contractor and the staff for the completion of this Regional Interceptor Sewer. Staff l recornrnends adoption of the resolution included in the ag e nda ma l erial authorizing filing of the Notice of Comp 1 et ion .0 t:¥ LGc ¥" _ ' -;/,,,... ,/ (!,t ., ,.__:f C'( ( .U.· · { \ ) ' ~ .-.~ ,.1 i. :'I ~· ("l ' * ,.,: . ' o,..i.. ~ RECEIVE, FILE AND DENYfPROTEST,OF CONTRACTOR REGARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN The contractor, in performing the work for ~ installation of the Yorba Linds Force Main, was directed by the staff to comply with the specifications to back-fill certain areas excavated within the street right of way within certain time limits to I mitigate the impacts on t',fi?fr commercial developments within the City of Fullerton. The contractor was instructed to cease f;:~~i~;;~-~f th~~i~ oi Efte inail'l liRQ force main sewer until such time as the back fill operations had been successfully completed. l The contractor has filed ,~ claim in the amount of $67, 960. 85 (_ · I f')i~ '{1~ C),l._ .. ~ <.k.1 I : ( for costs incurred durin1g this "shut-down" Aoperation. I &taff ~ , . has denied the contrac~or's claim and)in accordance with Section 8-4 of the Standard Specifications for this contract, l the. contractor:. is _filing a f~rm_al protest ~. the "gasiQer;itj on .. .._ .J{ ' . , . ~ ' ~ q . .. . ( :,. .. ' e ~the Board ;~--f>±rectoi:-s..._ Copies of tl;le contractor's claim I A~,_; and the Chief Engin~er's denial of ~ claim are included in I ~ · t ~d -·· -11 e~ .. t~ your agenda mat~ri~l: 7! ,. ~·.!;. (.~ ~: ... ,; • 1 • , -.· (,.'t' ~J :' / ~ ; . \ I • . I .·~ ! ( • . . •• "1 I ) . ~ ... t ./ ~ . ! : I . ' : c ' ,,,. ;'. .\ , f ~ t': I J' ( ) 1 fJ L '· CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-l -_M.AmWLE REPLACEMEN'I', .LOB ALAMI'fOS ~U:BTRUNR-. f LAL-#"'; This change order i~ time allowance oE68 calendar days•for .tMe · / /} ~vc?. IJi.nhole i<splacementle:Ji ~ Los Alamitos Subtrunk. The contractor~~ delays ~ due to lack Of availability ane aela:ys in aeliYery ~ ~~ '1l-_... Ji of specified materials for th-is-~ject. '.Wri:S. project is 4;.A-e "u/' replacement of two manholes GA t:Re Le!! Alamitos anbt;r;Qn]ic and the k • h 0 0 I~:.. 1 contractor was wor 1~~ at.. t e D~str~ct s convenience to rep ace --tk \NW.., ~ y ~'\l~ .• ,J ~ manholes/\and tg Otl!!L&in operation of the sewer system-a& <H.ree~es. Staff recommends approval of this change order for a time extension. I ~c ACCEPT~ ~ JOB NO. 3-8R-l AS COMPLETE The contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has compieted tv-L~ ~l<-~~ µ_r,/&A,·_,.x_ the replacement of the two rnanholes~rfquired on this job and I lfLt ~<h, complied with all the contract requirements. AStaff 1recornrnends I acceptance of the work as complete)~filing of the Notice :~ completion )fu-3= tl~s project. f/o.A-J, cG'f "" ·' f fl, ff 1 :,{ ex-ne:d c.i7,RJ.~, . ,d ~~,~--~ ~~ A AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION; ieR~EE-R-4J ,DESIGN ~~R ,/ WESTSIDE FORCE MAIN, SECOND PHASE () l-tA V"' ~~l The District's s p aff has monitored ~ flows being received by ~· ~ Seal Beach APumping Station and, in accordance with the Master (!:;"~-;-. Plan of Trunk _sewers_ for District No. ~Athe second force main ~ d~--Efl-e sewage from this pumping station to the Knott Interceptor Sewer should~ constructed ~~~Be-G0m.::.. rne..Q..Ced during thi S-f.-i.s-ea-1-y-ea~r-. -In the ~g :X'fff tly adopted -~ by-the DiteCb5-1;.s, G..f the tot;ei.l $920,000 };mdget;9d for this force r""()" ma-in-, $ 5 0 0 ~O Has 00€.B-Qudge t ed tO-he-e *~e-BEl.·ee-±-11 thi~s-ri-s-ca±­ ~-~~t th'5 I'!ebr aary Boanr.Meet:l:Ft~7 ~e Boards adopted4f policy for the select.ion of professional engineering services_ Inoltid-ecl- ~--4~'t1":--B<~~a-s--a-~~~~ that when a consulting e ngineer has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board determines that it would be in the best interest of the District to retain this firm for subsequent phases of the work, then the Selection Committee ~ proceed directly . hW-. . ~ ~ --tLv-. . ~ ~ . h' wi~ ~ negotiations :1.or compJl:a ~1 j n w1 :~~~~~-t:J, is provision is particu l arly~ when a ~rn has completed-bl.. Master 1 d .~f ~1 1• • h ~~1 ~~~ ~ · · P an Report an is ~ am'i.-l~ar w1 t {\Simi ar proJ ects , ...... ...-.-9.!t-'\District ~ & ~"';,(. ~'lA,J'-'v-c.: ,__, ~-l VYI ~"""'; ~ ~~ Wtd. c.t~ {IA ,}~~}~ It ~is , l:here ~u re S recommended that the staff be authorized to ~ ~"}~ ~ ~·~~ <:~ .. • negotiate directly with Boyie EHgineerir-r9-Ge-1"1'&~n /\to pre pare ~. · · · f -hhi'Vc nrr.-i 'er-+-~ h' ~ -h ~ld .1 2:' the plans and specif 1cat ~on~ or _~ T .. is ~ct s ou f-: be expedited b e cause of the v e ry favorable bids Qeing submitted by S--- . ~. . ?-contractors on ~r sewer construction ~~tJ:i..~r~Q4.-strrces at i this time . =r. 8z and 8 aa I CHANGE ORDER NO . 1 ; 2 TO CONTRACT NO. 5-20; .frib ~;;~ y Th U change orde9' ill! for the purchase of ~.(o x~ma te 1 y 1, 000 additional linear feet of 24" class 50 ctii e iron pipe and appurtenant fittings which will extend he Back Bay right of way along Big Canyon to the Jamboree Pum~ Station . After discussions with the affected agencies, incl uding the Department of Fish and Game , the City of Newport Beach and the Coastal I Commission, and after a thorough review of the archaeologists report for this facility, Qit 1 vyas decided /that it would be in the rr(., ~ {!.t v C.VV"'-<-' -> ;.--i I best interestX..c;>-f the project vto co~stru s t this portion in cast JJ.rVv ~J) I iron pipe in lieu of the original propo~ed vitrified clay pipe. This material will be fu,ni ~hed ;o ~installatio~ contractor.-t{..,_,\-~~-teJ..Q ~ , ~~~kt~ I R.jds for the in~Tht ieR are to be received on September 14th. Staff recommends app:oval of th ~cr/.nge orde9 in the~nt of $t:r; 9 gg .5 7 . h + 1-i<;. {, v--7 / I I I 8bb I Authorizing AAward ~ Contract No . r 20 -Back Bay Trunk S;t Bids for the installation of the s bwer pipe purchased f,k the Back Bay: Trunk Sewer are sche~dule d to be received on /_14 with ~~ ''> ;i;a cei 1'1: !! E Lin:!\ 'b id s after the~ ea ing on this project by the Regional Board of the California ~ Zone Conservation Commiss i on which is scheduled for 1' l~. The staff and consulting engineers ~ave reviewed this pr i ject with a ll ~~~Hxxix±Hg [ into affected agencies and have inc 9rporated/the plans and specifications those requirements necessary t d meet the needs of those agencies a:t!etcted. Since it is critical to complete the construction of this facility before December 1, 1976, it wi ll be necessary to award a contract after receipt of the Coastal Commission ~ Pe1 1 iO but prior to the Octobf r Board Meeting. It is, therefore, recommende 1 that the General Manager be authori z ed to award the contract for the bids to be received (J..N j~_() / ~'21'('ooo r;;:: ~R 9 14 in an amount not to r xceed $&!i'cl ,4@0 , ~approval of the project by the Ca li fornia Coastal Zone Conservation Commission. \ INITIATION OF ANNEXATION PROCEEDING~,-TRACT NO. 8925. (ANNEXATION NO. 57) I I Last month, the Board referred a req,Uest for the annexation of ' 7. 849 acres in the Lemon Heights ar~a in ~ unincorporated ~-f.tvJ,d;;1 , ~~· ~1,·~,f C:: of the QisEriet to the staff forAr~c~mmendation. Th~~development I the District's low 1~ensi ty residential criteria which ha• 1sccn established for this area ~ the District's Master Plan. Staff recommends th'e Board adopt Resolution 76--7 initiating annexation proceedings. I \ I INITIATION OF ANNEXA TION PROCEED I NGS -ft"'RCfi!O&SED ANNEXATION NO. 58) ~~ ~c.-k• I I At the August Board Meeting, the Bo ard referred t o staff for recommendation a request for annexation of 13.410 acres located northwest of Peter~ Can_ion, adjac/ent to Sirrine Drive in the . ~ .. unincorporated area~of DistrictJ o. 7. The proposed developme nt mee ts the District's low d e nsitL ~sidential criter ia wh-~ haea e stablished for this area ~Q bfte District's master p lan...._fl Staff ~ends the Board adof t Resolution 76-J'}_L-7 initiating annexation proceedings . \ \ ~ ~This item appearing~ agendJr orders ~he annexation of 6.934 acres t o the District , which is north est of Peters Canyon Road advacent to Sirrine , Mira Vista and Ov rhill Drives in the unincorporated territo ry of the District . Tre Board authorized initiation of proceedings for annexation in March, 1976. LAFCO approva l has been received and the proponent has paid the require d fees. It is the staff's recommendati o n that Reso lution No. 76-~ be approved. REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION -TRACT NO. 9072 The District has received a formal request for annexation of 10.04 acres which is located on the south side of Bond Avenue 660 feet east of Rancho Santiago in the City of Orange. It is recommended that the request of the property owner be referred to staff for report and recommendation :to the Board. . k ( ... ~ i ~ CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 1 and 2 TO CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 J v'J_ c(/ ~h@s~ @hange order~)~e for adjustments ~engine r' ,J ~ d--;-, '"'c ~L CLo--~ ~k Y'u, I quantiti =.:'.)~n~-t o~a-~ deduction ~ffi~UR_!_of 7.~5 ~80 ~~plY• ~Re addition of backfill material as required ~n the specifications ~' at the bid stipulate ~;am~~~or a total of $9,1361 J.U,.s.e ov....J ip.clude~}~~L ~~~t,e~i .~ ~k of a private roadway~in the amount of $6,016.4{}-.J ich was deleted from the original bid document but would h elv e normally been included as part original work required oF~he contractor. RNX~Ke These change orders increase the ;r .~nal amount of ;;:::' contract by a~{ $14,901.20, or approximately Staff recommends approval)~ these change-o~ders. '· . «/~ ~j l ~ ACCEPT~ Cf" CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 0-1 ~ The contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company,, has completed the installation of this portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk . d . . ) h Sewer and has complie with all requirements Ou t e contract documents. Ge;:,r.:,~t ·nst:attee. 7500 feet 00 4", 21" and 18" diameter pipe ~in the El Modena area, beginning at the intersection of Spring Street and Santiago Boulevard and terminating at Linda Vista and Santiago .In - ~I a?-~~( I I -. \\\. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j " J / Staff recommends adopt ion of the Resolution attached to the ~ ~~<tf agenda material authorizing the filing 1 of the Notice of Comp~etion \ I -. -- rt s hould be noted that the contract0r completed this contract '~ within the time allotted for the prj ject, 56 days prior to the '\ e xpiration date . This project com/letes the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer within the pr e sent District o . 7 boundaries . -- . C£ 11 Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 11-lR-l This change order adjusts the engineer's quantities ~a total t..~~..:. amoYni=-of '?f $731 d.ed~elion. The original plans specified that the contra~epair a manhole in the State Highway (Beach Blvd.y and the eentrac=l=ef was delayed by the State Depa ~e nt of Transportation wa~ for an encroachment permit to inspect ~ manhole. After thorough examination of the manhole, .-.f te r Qpp r eval for cntrane@ ~ was obtainee , it was found that t~would not need repair .w...J ) ~ was, therefore, deleted fro·m the contract. Staff r ecommends approval of this change order. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-l ) . \ Contractor, Rewes Schock has completed the /repair or replacement of manholes on the Newland Del award Trun1/:nd has complied with /" all requirements of t he contra ~~. d_cccu~~~:~Staf f recommends y~ adoption of the ~esol~tion attache ~o the agend ~ mateFial L:. fi ~~ i . Y €A1 rzu.;~ 1 '{)'~--'.IJ authorizing _ filing of the Notic /f __ Comple_t io_n ~ ~t _•honld l5e n.o;&ea 'th deletions and J ajustments, the final contract cost was $1,871 lowe r than the original contract pr ice, or ( . / approximately 5% under the or'ginal contract amount. -------------------------~----- I fl1'· 71 ResolntiOR EstablishingJUse Charge Fees for Class I and Class II 'Discharger.~f&~-~ustr~:~ ~:st~) O~ftinan~ The~trial Waste Ordinance, which became effective '. ~ th/{ 'G;~~'Jff~Eers ~ establish July 1st of th~s_yeari p .. rovides .+ ~ ~k.1J-w' th-~o.·-<--'" .. "1:'-chargef~for £..the nse g..f "conveying, treating and disposing of sewage ~h~ Districts'~cilities a.AQ eaia ehar~e shall be based ~ L • ) -&-v.-J ,_ upon the total maintEman aperation,--capital-.expenditures .. and tbe reserve requirements for providing.-said-s-erviee. Class I industrial dischargers are the major industries in the County which will discharge volumes in excess of 50,000 gallons per day or discharge wastewaters which have a strength 50% greater than d · ~d. h · · h 'd d omestic sewage or~ isc arging constituents t at are consi ere incompatible with the Districts' sewerage system. The use-e-ha~ge, ~e~c-~ging 12-mo:r:.i_th-per.iod and any ~~-eJt.J;>r credi-t. ------··-------~ -.-~··-~- ~jus-t.-me.nt-.for ___ the. prece¢iing 12-month pe:r:j._gg_~§tiall __ J>e_ .included.. in. the i mz.o.i-ce -to-the--respe_ctiye. permit tee.. Class II dischargers are the industries which discharge more than 10,000 gallons per day but less than 50,000 gallons per day and are not required to l.(_~e. obtain a Class I permit ~ their discharge has been determined to be compatible with the Districts' sewerage system. Inasmuch as both Class I and II permittees are credited in the amount of the annual ad valorem tax levied by the Districts upon the property for which the permit has been issued by the District, exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service, each individual District must adopt separate resolutions establishing the use charges because of the varying tax rates within the individual Districts. A ' 14,i .flJ ~ /cflfp : Y>_ -fruJ ~ (.,,.v-< &..._ :a:;;. j t"V-.J ,/z,_J 11 di, ~ d ~ U'-,rµ'(Jt:-:/-~ ]_~ fa rt_ I ~~~ ~ 4&£rrt--rL_ ~~--- A ~e-s,t,aJ;.~.eornm~aseG.-u¥e" hlle provisions""" J~ contained in Section 302.6 and 303.1 of ~he Industrial Waste Ord in a nee , that th.e-Ba a rd es t.a~-s-l=i-1=.ae-i:rs·e-efl.a-~~e.r-tl:ie, ~ Class I a nd Class II permit~for the respective Districts as follows: ....,---·-- I / j II --'-. _ l2_s~~ iiiMeo c pvn..r~~ r 9lg.,s,g I~ ~~~~~~-:-----~~~~- 11. VALUE ENGINEERING FOR JOB NO. P2-23 75-MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE I TREATMENT FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 .,,,,,.---·· ~-~ rr/.l..t.~ ,0 l //A re. c_ent ·.regulation'¥af£ec.ting the cons ruction grant programs• /---n:' ---. le .~P i" ~· ~1 ~the(fEnvitonmental Protecti~~Ag~~~y\is the provision that all projects in excess of $10 million are s bject to value engineering procedures to insure that the faciliti s are constructed in accordance with the best available tee nology and construction pro_cedures. be performed Regtilations stipulate that1value engineering must by an independent engine~ring firm, not associated with the designE{t:. fl'-'. 1 • ·: ot_., l_ I At th~ 27 Executive Commit:Eee M~ing,_this matter ~Ms di.s_cussed and t~e-~J~~.ff_outlined. A tw;o phase procedure for the .~;~Jue engineer~, ~n;~.e .• ~~o,(·m~;uo~, /~.~p~o,v{t~Y,~:rr ~~~~1~y 1~s .A· C ~at Plant No. 2 .~ Phase I will involv1 tbe evaluation of the process <.. I a~d operation associatedJi:t:l:i the oxygen activated sludge portion ~-\ ~) ~--. \·\--1' -(It>-~,_ of these facilities. J1I..:e-is p~sed 1 that the con~ulting ·fi-rm of~-· Consoer-Townsend-and-Associat~s qf s!an Jose be employed to work .. ~ . . i in coDjnnction with the Di-s-t-ri-G-t~p.e.rational engineer for this I ~hase II will emphasize the/construction and maintenance valu.·e engineering and employe .. a:ulsi e contr1cting s;oµsult;ants, ~. g ~ c.. ... -~ .CM.) u.nl..J 1,,-# ,~ "',/1' c.-.~ c":-A. k 'tt .. ~ ~ ~"'-"' AV!l~.l ~with several key personne~ on the D stricts' staffA It was-U ~ ,,(.C-(t..·"' . ~~·h -~reported to the EXe-cutive Committee hat both phases of value engineering for this project will no exceed $175,000, which is grant fundable by the State and EPA. <i 1 rnclud~d in~ agenda material is a staff report to be submitted to the State and EPA for their ~pproval. 1lb~bntinue on our schedule to submit the plans and specifications to the State in April o~ next year as required by the construction grant program, ~ it i~ ne~essary to employ ~ firm of Cefteoer Townseat & Assoeiates ~ ~:f u.M.L. DJprior t.o the October Board Meeting. It is, therefore, recommended that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiat&itith Consoer Townsen~ and AssocJates in accordance with the policy adopted by the Boards for the .Employment of ~ofessional ingineering o-~rvice7 and that District No. 1 be authorized to award t.R-e-" contract for ~~ic~t~~n adjourned Board Meeting on Sept. 22. . At the August Board Meeting,----ttre Director~' approved the plans and ..........,/ / specifications for the installation of p'tmps, engines and·/ gear ~xes at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. ~major \ ~~;· equipment has been purchased under . · contracts approved by the Boards. Since bids for these ~~ditional pumping facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station/will not be received until next Tuesday, September 7th, the repJrts of the bid opening will be included in the Wednesday ntal agenda for~oards consideration. The Engineer's Esti ate for this inslallalion ceaErac~ is $310,000. I) APPROVAL OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TRUNK SEWER, AND APPROVJI li 6i' tfr,~N~--~~D c..,::t:-tl--J /-I { -PRe>OELT · ( ~--------------~ • ,,m,._~~~ '\ REPORTfi:,:?R RAITT STREET_./ SPECIFICATIO~FOR THE --·---·-··-· --·-.-__ ,_, ... J I I o.,,/L,.., e..~<. _/ The as:rtion~ appea~ing on the agenda forinallyAapprov~ the ~tw-'. "_, ~~ -l' ~ ~ '0-1 t {i ( ~, .. /1 t..! tL ~:,;., ~-~) .Environmental Impact Report~for the~Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, which extends from Sunflower Ayenue to Myftle. Ay.epu~ along Raitt Street ~·e; ~/. ~. t·r~., ...tt/(._ __ .:::Z..J.,AA·J'. (: 1;( in the City of Santa Ana~ /The staff and/or t~ District's , engineer( have been in contact-with the/Public Works Departments persffl!!ltl of all agencies affected and have not.received.any signir icant adverse co.mments on the-pr jec±.. r (, l'~t·· recommended that the~EIR be approved. ~pearing under this item is ~ appr Therefore, it is the plans and specifications as prepared by Boyle contract ~the District ~J ineeringCorporation under theae.. plans and specificationsA~·s.....J:.e~llllllle..lliJ.~~uu;~c...ne-..D-*~-a.e~a--:e:e--se---- µ ~-v...,,.~ , I estahli•h9d is October 5, 1976~ The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $1,405,000. \ Item 22 Engineering Services for the Feasibility Report Re: Sleepy Hollow Carbon Canyon Drainage Area Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter received from the State Water Resources Control Board approving the Plan of Study and the cost assoc~ated rherewit!f fort~! Steepy ~ollow A Carbo~~ ~~. ' (JJQ ~~ ~~-~·-)..A_. ~ ~~ &,# ~ Canyon drainage ~-Jtple Select~onUcornmittee, &G Qatlined in the Board policy for fhe Selection of Professional Engineering Services, )UA(J-~ M ~'· t., 9.--.. I rt_ will meet~with the firm which appears to be the best qualified for th&--f>~ejeetc~& submi=tted a pre~esal to perform the required services. The Selection Committee_,.-€emprised ef the Bi~triet; We. 6 Chairman and the Djitriets' J;)e~arlment Heads, w~ti meet gi;;i. T-u.e-sday, Se~t;emb.e.:t:--7-en e:nd will present their recommendations to the Board for .est?t consideration on Wednesday evening. 24. ANNEXATION NO. 7 -NEWPORT -IRVINE COASTAL AREA This aRftcxa~ieft request· by the Irvine Company proposes the ->~I\~ annexation of approximately J4.<ttr acres of the down coast Q.92&5 !al. te:i;: 1 ri tory between Newport Be··.· ac .. h al)fi Buck Gully Wash. ~ {'f'--~'t>t,··,( l. ~ ()..cC,cir ':"""~~ . r. ·ti~ ']!hi ~ma%tcr was discuss~,d at ~~mb~-t; ~9ard P1eet:tn.g h. e,ld ~ /J {'' t \J.J~ ' -' '-~'~ ~· O"\.V · r.tl. '· ( "'° r '<..CS[ 1-t{A&. /'.,. -~(l /U-~J C!.v..--~ _y t•(.~ll-' V at the Newport Beach b ty e.ouncil 6.hambersl\en 'fttarsda:y, Oest. 12. .{)1 •"""' Enclose~~ a_gend;;i~m<;1,te:ria~ i1> a_ lettu. from tfe property tJ;,;.~ ~ ~~f)..•.·c.t u_n'tL ,~-• ~ C\,tlL~,.;t. f>'tt/t-~~' c.. ~--. ~ ~"f· kft ().A~ t owner requesting annexation~ftft'd ~t~ payment of $2, 139->, 790. ooA for ~\!l. Vt r 1535 acres desic;mated hr develo~ment.'fithin t~e proposed ~~ ,IV' ~Ct> l'"-/)(\.. ~i~( ~1-~ nnexation are~. JGeneral CounselAwi-li :t:~pert ht Wednesday_.-s ~ ;ti__ ~;J;-~ meeti~ .as te ehe.conditions ~annexation as set ~rth by the ~J e. . (JV\_ 0 • D'i:fe9-terS--.st St@ 'fcp~emb-. · · ! August 12; cu-~ l.Jfl,eJ. ~~;1 fV. ~ -o:f -:t(_\ I l~I 1' e \ ' ;. 'A \_ u.a, (. · t .(:>' ~(· . {j lJ - The Irvine Company ha~ed application t~ocal Age~ Formation Commission fer ~Ris aBRexation in order that ~~ ~ matt:er can be heard before the<Jbrnmission at their regular September 22nd meeting . ... ~·~){~_, T~aff is req-aesting discussions on thi;s matter in erder 1/l Mp:.r _that_ tbe staf-£ ~ Gener.a~ Counsel can (rece.b.r..e-the Bqa.rd 9't. A iJ_ ~ ~,vy ~ i.,: /r-r 61 ~J!fa'< ~tJVe~f' direeeibrt ~set~ ~11 co,1fditions1~prov~ng~-~~_e:?I1ent ~tX. --<t~-lfVtrte~L/ ~ ~~A-(·1 ' o with the Irvine Company,A:'ela~~~Uee tRe annexation i~ceFporating ) said condtio.ns inte the resolutions ~itiat:ing proceedings for k /) ' • ttl . /ID.A /)_:I,~( 1 '- thi e down coast ~a. • : -(;) ao/'Ap l.A.(.c. ~-(... ~ /--~ I {,,' f2t. ~fi'--<I' ;;A._ ·c ~;/ eel'#t:t!: ' ' ' . ' t lJ ~ 27. FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF ORANGE PARK ACRES . -- of Thirty-two (32) Digester ~( Approve Addendum No. 1 to Job No. J-6-lD {!)~pprove Addendum No.· 1 to Specification No. E-080 Operators, Diversion Structure requirements ~ . -:::-.._ -~ ·-. -. ,c ~~g,V~n~ ,~-)., e Oraers f or ~act 2-14-ef 1~1 ~lfY ()i<-~j \!}A i 114 /'-il ~ Contract 2-14-4 as complete d pprove Final Closeout Agreement Q'~R ~~ protest of Vida Artukovich re denial of claim by CSD in the ~rn;~nt of $67,960.85 for standby costs incurred re Contract 2-16-2 -S'et\ time and place~ri~g re inti.a · annexat ·on in Vill /.Park Ann~~-Tract N'o-..-23.5-C}--./"(if .LAFC resolution approving annexation is received) £2,.yt- ' _9.R11e~ p ry-~ngs 5/12/76 z-b.382 ac"'?e-5 DISTRICT 3 l Y?Init~a~e a~n e xation proceedings for down-coast ar e a subj e ct to pr e scribed conditions t-V ~ (}.I.-..; "' ~~to " i" ~ .... ~"'\}' &.. fa~....-' l y--~-b,;,,&~{brfD ,o ward ~ohtract.for Back Bay T:unk Sewer, Contract No. 5-20,./\.conditional pending receipt of the p e rmit from the Coastal Commission H '2. ,·z,./ ~~ _ch?1ge Order~ to Contract 5-20A for cast iron "T" fittings -a~~eqtt~ t_C v q_y th_e.,_jj,_s~(;ame-Dep_t._ for futur e /\co nnections f;;rs, qgo . S7 · ~ y; 3rJf.o.5 . .. DISTRICT 7 7 Initiate <:Cl Of. ( R & F I d annexation proceedings re Annexation No. 8/11/76) ?? ~eed REL recommendation. 57 -Tract No. 8295 ~·i ~nitiate annexation proceedings re Annexation No. 58 -Baker Annexation Cl (R & F'd 8/11/76) ?? Ne ed REL recommend a tion. ~ ,_/order Annexation No. 48 -Tract ~No. 5369 (~AFC---r--e.s0 ~ut-i...on--reoe~-ved-; r.,~~ .~ea-r~ng--hei:<l-8 /11.-/761 ~ )<r'W t~ Ord -·-i ~~M~~~o~~~ ' /I . -ring _ /"'81 11 /7 6 ) _./ ..___.., I-+ g__.... ~Change Orders to Contract 7-6-9 for additional pavement and adjustment of engineer's quantities .:f15>33 '1.o-o -+ ~t 4 d-s ./Sal~-g~J t ~pt Contract 7-6-9 as complete and approve Final Clos eout Agreement : ~ive, file & refer to staff request for annexation of 10.04 acres from (~Hillcrest Village -Proposed Annexation No. 59 -Tract No. 9072 E STRICT 11 -. {.Ji"( ~JW3.JL ~ ~ ?..-~ \I -\ -\ ~ ~' i ~.ll/lt;.~ -4 ~ QJ~~ 1-:.?q ~t,\) -0 e.,.A(ccep1 Contract 11-1-lR as comple'te and approve Final Closeout Agreement v ------------·-----fi/&i\Y:: '11)---rc::;_.· ----- . Rece ive and f ile Draft Maste~an-~e-r-~t rict 11 and ~ adjourn~&--t:' meeting for September 13.~e ets prior to September 8th meeting at 6:00 p.m . als . SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 JOINT MTG. ~a) Report of the Joint Chairman Winn reported that he and Director Barrett attended the CASA Conference in San Diego. Said that top people from SWRCB and EPA were there. Met Ralph Bolin, the presiding officer of CASA. Thought one of the highlights was his election as Director-at-Large. Met new Chairman of SWRCB, John Bryson. Asked Director Barrett for his comments--thought that the various programs were very good. JWS also reported on Conference. John Bryson and Paul Defalco were there. Said these people are coming to us now and is a real indication of how effective CASA has become in dealing with regulatory agencies throughout the State. Several of the programs were geared to Directors. Also had some technical sessions on revenue and grant programs. This was the most successful conference CASA has had to date. Wieder asked how many Directors participated in conference and was told just Winn and Barrett. Said she was disappointed more didn't attend. Winn mentioned that they had gotten hung up on parliamentary procedures at the conference and should try to avoid that in the future. (6b) Report of the General Manager (6c) FAH reported that at the August meeting it was suggested that the Directors view the operation of the JPL operation at Plant 2. We are planning this event for the next Board meeting. Will meet between 5:30 and 6:30 prior to the October 13th meeting and if Boards approve, will come back here for a light dinner. Said if anyone would like to invite their staff from cities are welcome to do so but will have to charge them a nominal fee for dinner. County Auditor will not pay for their dinners. It was so moved and seconded to do this. FAH said invitations will be mailed to Directors. Cooper asked Mr. Harper to clarify what he just said. Explained that prior to the next Board meeting we could rent a bus or drive to Plant 2 to see the 1 MGD facility which is the new method of treating wastewater. A light dinner will be served at 7:00 and may start the Board meeting at 8:00. Holt asked if this would be the only time a tour would be available? FAH said, no, that he could just call and we would make arrangements for a tour. Mr. Harper then briefly reported that he just returned from his EPA trip to Russian. Said he hoped to have some pictures to show at the next Board meeting. Said everything looked like it was made in America. Treatment facilities looked like they were 50-60 years old but were 10 years old. Said he was concerned about the domestic water supply and what happened to waste from its system. Water in the bathtub in Moscow looked the color of coffee. Listed a few places he had visited. Said it was an interesting trip and will have slides to show later. Report of the General Counsel TLW reported that he did get a response regarding recovery of expenses for undisclosed utities from the Gas Company. Answer has been filed in court and rather lengthy written correspondence has been received. Said it should be quite interesting. Sounds like they are ready to sit down and talk settlement. Reported he attended the CASA meeting just from 8:45 -10:00 and sat on panel. ~ (6a) Cont. (8) Also advised that legislation has now been signed for alternate Directors to be appointed from sanitary districts. Chairman Winn then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for September 22, 1976, and invited Directors Holt and Olson to attend. CONSENT CALENDAR -Items removed: (g) Scott referred to attachment "L" and said it changes insurance for one person to $300,000 and for more than one person to $1 million. Has to only be one amount. Can't split bodily injury. Should require $300,000 for one or two persons and $1 million umbrella policy. TLW explained that that was our intent and requirement would be that way. Svalstad said contractor should have read these insurance requirements in specs and should give us a cost reduction. It costs money for this coverage and if he read specs, should have bid with these requirements. REL explained that we have standard specifications which have our larger requirements in them. For most of the smaller contracts that are awarded, we use these reduced requirements. Stated it was an inadvertency on staff's part that we did not clarify that to contractor. Svalstad added that if other contractors bid on requirements in specs, might make a difference in bids. Perry agreed. Suggested that specs be amended so this doesn't happen again. REL stated that some of the small contractors can't get that much insurance. Winn asked if REL could negotiate a reduction in contract. Said he could possibly do so. It was moved and seconded to negotiate for some kind of cost reduction in contract. (not necessarily the $1,000 reduced premium amount but just some reduction) (y) Svalstad stated that he felt this should go to Selection Committee rather than go directly to Boyle. REL agreed that Svalstad was correct. Wording should say authorizing "Selection Committee" to negotiate as the fee will be between $10,000 and $100,000. Svalstad questioned Boyle being the only one submitting proposals. REL stated that in accordance with the policy if the engineer has done the basic plan, can be selected without going through other engineers. If we cannot negotiate with that engineer, then can go to other engineers. Said Boyle did design first facility. Is familiar with hydraulic system. In accordance with policy, is the logical engineer to negotiate with. Svalstad said, fine, but want to make sure we do negotiate with them and if they aren't competitive, should go to selection process. Whether they designed it or not, shouldn't automatically go to Boyle. Item (y) was then approved as amended authorizing Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering. Voice vote. Motion carried. -2- (10) Resolutions establishing use charges (12a) JWS reported that the Uniform Ordinancesthat the seven Districts adopted provide that after the budgets have been adopted each year, the Board establishes a rate for the industrial commercial users. Board adopted budget in August and these figures set forth various charges for Class I and Class II permittees. Figures are based on Operating budgets of each respective District. They are actually less than we had anticipated last year when considering the ordinances, primarily because Nf construction and completion of activated sludge facility.will probably be about six months later than anticipated. Said these costs reflect primary treatment only. When secondary treatment is on line these costs will increase substantially. Total cost for joint Districts in Los Angeles County is $230 as opposed to $194 as highest charge in District 11. Award of J-6-lD REL briefly explained that this contract is for installation of two engines, pumps and gear boxes at the booster station at Plant No. 2. Said two years ago we received bids for this project which were over the engineer's estimate. Staff was instructed to do work. Have awarded three contracts for equipment. Young then asked what happens if a contractor we are having trouble with bids on a future job. TLW said it is in within the rights of the District to determine if he is not qualified if he is low bidder provided we have some reasonable basis. District is not bound to award to him and can go to next low bidder. Failure to comply with construction standards in previous jobs of if he has financial problems that cost District for stop notices etc. are reasonable causes. Cooper added that he wanted to make sure Skipper & Co. was a qualified company ~ and Young's question answered this. (24) DISTRICT 5 -Down-coast area annexation (b) TLW reported that the action of Directors of District 5 at special meeting was made quite clear. Mr. Jones expressed some concern apout additional "' \ _, requirements that in the event any··-porffon-'(ff '-the" annexed territory is \ 1 '« \.. "~) ! ·, '· .. subsequenfly annexed to another entity, District 5 will have the right to deaiinex~-1om said direction he received was to try to reach agreement with ~'"-· _,, '~-':"· !( Th·e Irvine Company by going forward to LAFC with request for annexation . . . ,. · r• 1, t· 1l One alternate possibility was to not perform annexation but enter into an agreement with The Irvine Company or Irvine Ranch Water District. ;., , , .· Said his opinion was that both alternatives present some practical and ·" legal difficu1_1Jes. Said he ........ faIKed-tO' Mc1ririis this. evening and think we now have a lot better direction in terms of being able to establish that The Irvine Company and IRWD would give to District 5 letters of consent and agreement that would set forth the conditions as enumerated by District 5 at their last meeting. Thought to go on basis of annexation that would be d.edar-ed-fo have the right of deannexation would be most difficult to enforce. Very clearly defined statutory procedures on deannexation which could entail an election. Irvine Company might not even be the owners. Therefore, we can proceed with The Irvine Company in terms of getting an agreement. Can obtain letters of intent, consent and obligation or whatever from the Irvine Company and would also recommend that IRWD be made a party to it as they will be the local sewering agency to our system. Mcinnis stated he was looking for more than letters of intent. More interested in document drawn in legal form even though it might not be enforceable 10 years from now. Agreement should be with The Irvine Company as land owner and IRWD as sewering agency. Should draw it up in legal form even though quite -3- sure someplace along the line may not be legally enforceable. Need something for LAFCO as conditions of annexation. Winn then asked if Districts ever looked at a master plan that might someday encompass the whole Orange County? FAH explained that each of the Districts has its own master plan is which based pretty much on the drainage area. They could serve just a portion in District 5. This area has already been considered in their master plan. In this particular case based on the latest land use plan of the County, we are looking at a total acreage of About 25% will be developed. The area in this is undeveloped area outside District 5. Reiterated that each of the Districts have their own master plans of areas that could be served. Winn said possibly the Executive Committee should take a look at some kind of master plan for the County and review it. Back to Mcinnis' request. He stated he is looking for a formal agreement between District 5, The Irvine Company and Irvine Ranch Water District, which spells out the conditions under which we will enter into such an agreement and what we do in the event the conditions change in the future. Said this is almost identical to discussion they had at last District 5 meeting. Said he thought the attorney understood what he is saying and the Directors of District 5. TLW stated he thought we could strike some agreement. Said Mr. Jones indicated The Irvine Company is willing to sign such an agreement. Have requested they provide that in the event District 5 should deannex, that they would agree to serve it on a contract basis. TLW recommended that that would be appropriate. Mcinnis then stated that with that understanding, was ready to move back and move staff's recommendation on 24(a). Motion seconded & carried. TLW concurred. District would provide sewerage service to the territory to be annexed; the owner, The Irvine Company, would pay the annexation fees presently in force; that District 5 reserves the right to initiate any and all legal proceedings to have the territory either deannexed or detached from the jurisdiction of the District in the event any portion of the annexation is annexed to another municipal jurisdiction other than the City of Newport Beach. Mcinnis stated his motion was subject to Tom Woodruff's concurrence in agreement. (24d & e) It was suggested by Mcinnis that the District adjourn to September 21st to consider both these resolutions. Moved and seconded to adjourn to Sept. 21 at 5:30 p.m. at Newport Beach City Hall to consider resolutions. Voice vote. Motion carried. (27) DISTRICT 7 -OPA (a) TLW referred to the lengthy report submitted with agenda and stated he had no further report. Said additional fees have not been received yet. (b) Saltarelli requested that District 7 for the next six months at least not be placed last on the agenda. He further stated it was his understanding that the District Directors would meet at an OPA school or in the area so everybody could disseminate at that time and place. Said staff should bring to that place a graphic _!'~~PE.~-~-12.!..~~iog_ of what we are talking about so they can see where the trunk lines are and -4- I' \ . '' '· \· \, I \,' \ ' I ~11,.' and a cost analysis ot_wha_!_i!_~Jll~f_<?~~t J~.h.entJ:p _g~t. ~-hat .:they. get s9 . they can see what it means to t_hem,_. Said he felt this is an opportunity to vote on this issue and we have to see that we inform them of all the f~ct.s. No withholding of information. Has been withholding and ~t~lnfoAma~ tion in the past. Asked if staff can have this type of presentation prepared.~'a:rid how long it would take? Smith said he thought staff was going to arrange a meeting at the Santiago School which is where they usually meet. Mr. Brock suggested the Salem Lutheran Church Sunday School area. Is suitable for a meeting of this type. Will be able to set up charts, etc. Said he can make arrangements if we let him know the date. Saltarelli stated we are not going to make November ballot so will shoot for March--~ Should get proper lriroimat'Ion f o. everyone. Burton asked if he was requesting a full-scale blown-up map with parcels and location of trunks? Answered yes. FAH then recognized Mr. Hohener. Said he could describe what maps are available. Burton said if we are going to have a map that depicts where the main trunks are and what is considered on the main bond, any__Ji:i.d.!vJc;lu?-1 that is a home o~er or prop_~-~!Y. q_wner should be able to ask where his property is in --relationship to these trunks. Conrad stated that has been aiilap-prepared which shows complete master plan of the area and each individual home owner can point to his lot and see the sewer it is on. Said Enginee_i-~ s Report which was completed l(lst Spring_must be l:lP<l~ted so_ it has new A.V. 's. BurtorCaske'd-if-iii.dividuals can ask where their parcel is and have it explained as many people cannot read a map. Map should be large enough and easy to read. Smith then asked for a brochure-type document referring to Reaches 17 & 18. Said if you have to show 300 people their lot, would take all evening. Should also have small map with main streets and show them where main trunk lines go. Burton argued that if all you can see are the trunks, you can't understand relationship and it is going to be very difficult for them to make a decision. Winn said he was concerned that many of the people will be paying for this service and not be subject to it. Staff should make l1P brochure, .. map, _ _,etc. and send to District 7 Directors to rev1~~before~~g0Ing_ tq~-p~gpt~. Ma~ -~~1Ta ·s-pecial meeting before go:ti1g to OPA area. · Saltarelli stated that he was sure that the staff will be able to prepare the necessary information to present. Will plot maps. Analysis of financial breakdown; how much it is going to cost per A.V. Be sure people are fully informe-cf aiid-In-£6-rmation going out is correct. Asked members of tfie stafr necess-iri to be there to answer questions re sewer service' connections, etc. Rach said they had voter records if that would help. Offered his assistance. It was mentioned again that District 7 may have a special meeting to consider material before mailout to property owners. Smith asked if people are approximately three blocks from main trunk line, canstafftell that person approximately how much it will cost to get there? FAH answered yes, can tell them that. Could have information sometime in October. Winn suggested having preliminary meeting prior to October meeting and then set a date for OPA meeting at that time. -5- 'i ~,' r' Smith then referred to General Counsel's report (item (a). Said he realize·d· these are methods to serve that area but doesn't set too well with City of Orange. Said he would like to ask this Board if this is o~r-the-·ways that they are considering (condemnation of line)? Thought there· ·woul(f be a lot better feelings if this isn't quoted around too much. Would like to ask the Board if they will remove that as one_qf the possi1iilrt1es? -.~:--~T·~:· --· -·· r-·~r ... -'. ---·-\..__"'" '"' •j. ..... ~. ·• I' <;I l ) Burton stated this is part of a public agenda. Would be making it a bigger thing by taking it out. Would create a condition where it appears that Directors are attempting to mitigate something. Is something all of our councils are faced with. TLW stated that he simply put out a report. Staff has in no way indicated ~ a-preference or recommendation for any method of acquisition or establishment of a line. These are just three possibilities. They may vote to do anything ) they wish. The main point is that if bond election and annexation are successfully pa·s-sed;· -at -that time the District would incur an obligatibn to-uri.derta1Ce to provide a trunk sewer system. Have the obligation to provide -.-.--r~---'" l -~ service. Sal tarel li __ said he thought it is premature to take any action on that. . Only in the event the issue passes will the Directors have to begin discussion to bring about~C!YS of providing_ facilities. Winn asked if it would be in order if this information not be in the information sent to the people? Saltarelli stated he didn't think that the way we xliM«i« go about building a sewer is of any concern to the people. Should be concerned only with what will they get; how much will it cost; and who will be served. Burton asked what would happen if issue passes and action is not to condemn? TLW said his opinion was that District has legal obligation to provide the service. Probably can force District to provide service--must build or buy. Burton said he did not see anything wrong with discussing condemnation in the open as this is meant to be discussed. By removing it is blowing it out of correct proportion. Smith then withdrew his request_ to remove this alternative. Felt his request -------~---was partially misunderstood by Directors. It was stated that ?t~ff __ wiU su_b!!li t preliminary drafts of information to be Sliotnitted at tne" OPA meeting __ ~~ be called sometime 'after the October meeting. -----. . . . ... • . . .• -· --They ca1led an adjourned meeting after the Board meeting--date to be determined at the October meeting. Will be late October or early November. Rach suggested first of December would be a good time. TLW added that an updat_~ of_ th.~ __ J~qyle_rep_o:r:t would entail.Jnore engineering fees:-Said Directors-gave instructions that expenses will amount to monies deposited. Will be engineering costs for updated report. Rach said additional funds will be deposited but they have reached a point where people need this meeting to decide whether they are in favor or not. Rach felt meeting was very important to everyone concerned. TLW said if we go forward, will have additional legal fees, engineering fees, posting & publication notices, election fees, etc.--approximately $2700 additional needed. -6- FAH said don't pay any funds for updating report. ?? Smith said they should leave it up to staff to get what funds needed to cover the expenses. Conrad Hohener advised that there are 450 parcels and have to go to County to get valuations. Have to put figures in and maybe have to revise. Some 60 acres already annexed to City of Orange will have to be deleted. Winn suggested that staff update the District report, within limits, (and don't let Directors know what it costs). Winn suggested District 7 pick a time separate from Executive Committee or Joint Meeting day for this adjourned meeting. ! I' f' ~ ... ' ~~ 7 , .. f', ·-'. -7- I \