HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-09-08ll
.. BOARDS OF DJRECTO rt S
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICT No. 11
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 -6:00 P.M.
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Post Office Box 8 127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Te lephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(3) Discussion re Draft Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for County
Sanitation Distri~t No. 11 (copies of proposed District Master Plan
and proposed City Master Plan enclosed)
(4) Other business and communications
(5) Consideration of motion to adjourn 7 ''"YD
MEETING DATE September 8, 1976 TIME 6:00 p.m. DJ STR ICTS 11 ~----~-~
D'I STRICT 1
(EVANS) ......••• GARTHE ...•.• _____ _
(EDGAR) .••.•...• SHAR P .•.••• _____ _
DIEDRICH .•. _______ _
RIMA ........ ----· ---
DISTRICT 2
(GROOT) ......••. WEDAA •••.•.• ~HOLLINDENL ... SCOTT •...••• == == ==
. DIEDRICH) .....• CLARK ..••.•.
GART HE ) ........ EVANS ...••.• ------
~WEDDLE) .......• FOX .......... ------
DE J~susL ..•. HOLT .•..•.... == == ==
THOM) .•........ KAY WOOD .....
PERRY ..•.... ------
(HOYT) ........•• SM ITH •...•.. ------
~TIPTON) ....••.• WINN •....... == == ==
WARD) •.•.•..... WOOD . . • . • • . . ·
GRAHAM) .....••. YOUNG .....•. == == ==
· DISTRICT 3
(WARD) ..•.. ." .... WOOD .••....• _____ ·_
(HOLLI NDEN) .. · · SVA LSTAD· · · · _____ _
(GRAY)······· .•• BLACKMAN···· _____ _
(WEDDLE)········ COOP ER······ ----__
(SYLVIA).······· CO X·········· ------CUL VER· .. · .• _____ _
GAR THE) · · · · · · · · EVANS · • · · · • · _____ _
PRIEST).······· FRES E······· _____ _
THOM)·········· KAYWOO D····· _____ _
LACAYO)········ MAC LAI N···· _____ _
DAVI s) · · · · · · · · · MEYER······· __ ----
OLSON······· __ --_· _
!WIEDER).····· .. PAT T IN SON··· _____ _
DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT······ _____ _
YOUNG)········· STE VENS····· _____ _
MILLER)········ WEI S HAUPT··· _____ _
DI STRICT 5
MC INNI S .... _____ _
(DIED RIC H) ....•. RI LE Y ....... __ __
(WILLIA MS) .....• ROGERS ...... _____ _
DI STRICT 6
· RIMA........ _
(ROGERS) ...•..... RYCKOFF ..... == == __
DIEDRICH··· _____ _
DI STRICT 7
!
EDGA R) ........• SALTARELLI. _____ _
ROGERS) ... ····· BARRET T ····· _____ _
SILLS) ......•... BURTON ...... _____ _
DIEDRICH).····· CLARK······· _____ _
EVAN S) .. ····•·· GAR T HE • · · · · • _____ _
GLOCKNER····
(HOYT)·········· SM ITH······· == == ==
DI STRICT 11
(DI EDRICH).. ...• SCHMIT ...... ~ ___ _
SHENKMAN .••• ~ ___ _
WIEDER ..•••. ~ ___ _
DI STRICT 8
(DI EDR I CH) ...•.. RI LEY ...•...
EDW AR DS .... .
(JOHN SON) ......• SWE ENEY .... .
7/14/7 6
JO INT BOARDS
(R O GERS~.· ..... · BARRETT······ ____ .
DIEDRICH · .. ___ _
GRAY)) •..••••••• BLACKMAN .... ___ _
SILLS ... ~ ...... BUR TON .. ; ... _. __ _
DJEDRICHJ ...... CL ARK ....... ___ _
WEDDLE~ ....••... COO PER. ...... ___ _
SYLVIA .•..•.... COX .......... ___ _
CULVER ....... ___ _
!GARTHE) ....••••• EVAN S .•......
WEDDLE) ...... · ... FOX .......... ___ _
PRIE ST) ......... FR ESE ........ ___ _
EVAN S) •...•..... GARTHE. ...... ___ _
GLOCKNER ... .
!DE Jt:su s ). ....• HOLT ......... ====
TH OM) ........... KAYWOOD..... __
LACAYO).. ....... MAC LAIN .... == __
. MC I NN I S .... ___ _
(DAVI S) •........• MEYER ........ ___ _
OLSON ....... .
(WIEDER) ....•... PATTINSON •.. ====
PERRY ....... .
(DIEDRICH). ..... RILEY ........ ====
RIMA ........ .
WILLIAMS) ...... ROG ERS ....... ====
ROGERS) •....... RYCKOFF ..... .
EDGAR) •......... SA LT ARE LLI.. == ==
DIEDRICH) ....•. SC HMIT ....•.. ___ _
HOLLI NDEN) ..... SCO TT ....... .
EDGAR) .......... SHARP .....••. ___ _
S HEN KMAN ...• ~HOYT) ..........• SMIT H ........ ----
YOU NG) .........• STEVENS. ••... ----
HOLLINDEN) ..... SVA LSTAD ••.. == ==
(GROOT) .......••. WEDAA ...•.... ___ _
(MILLER) ......•. WEISHAUPT •.. ___ _
WI EDER •..••.
!TIPTON) ••.••... WINN ......... ----
WARD L ......... wooD· ......... == ==
GRAHAM) •••..... YOUNG .....•.. ___ _
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLAR KE
TA YLO R
BROWN
WOOD RUFF
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
·KENNEY
LYNCH
MADD OX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVE NS
TRAVERS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
September 2, 1976
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2, 3, SJ 6) 7 & 11
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 -7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
The next regular meetjng 0f the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Cal:i:foTniJ., wiLi
be held at the above hour and date.
Scheduled tmcomj ng meetings: _______ L:.:, _________ _
TELE PH ON ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
DISTlnCT 11 -· Wednesday, -~~:_C_!nbe0~76, 6: 00 p. m. (immediately
p~eceding Regular Joint Meeting)
DISTRICT 11
DISTRICT I
-Mond~y. Septcr.1her 13, 1976, 7:00 p.m.
H~mt ingt on B1.:"<:"!ch City Ha 11
-Wednesday, Sept:0mber 22, 197(>, S:OO p.lll. (immedi~1tely
preceding Executive Committee Meeting)
EXECUTJVE Cm!i-HTTl.~E -\\'ednesclay, September 22, 1976, 5:30 p.m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALI FOHN IA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVE:.NUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Q170~
(714) 540-2? I 0
(714) 962-24 l l
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Tentative Executive
Month Meeting Date Committee Meeting Date
September Sep. 8, 1976 Sep. 22, 1976
October Oct. 13, 1976 Oct. 27, 1976
November Nov. 10, 1976 Nov. 24, 1976*
December Dec. 8, 1976 None Scheduled
January Jan. 12, 1977 Jan. 26, 1977
February Feb. 9, 1977 Feb. 23, 1977
March Mar. 9, 1977 Mar. 23, 1977
April Apr. 13, 1977 Apr. 27, 1977
May May 11, 1977 May 25, 1977
June Jun. 8, 1977 Jun. 22, 1977
July Jul. 13, 1977 Jul. 27, 1977
August Aug. 10, 1977 None Scheduled
September Sep. 14, 1977 Sep. 28, 1977
*Thanksgiving Eve -subject to rescheduling
MANAG ER'S AGENDA REPORT
Cou n"ty Sanitation Districts
of O ra ng e County, Cal ifornia
JOINT BOARDS
September 8 , 1 97 6 -7:30 p .m.
Re gu lar Meeting
Post Office Box 8 12 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountai n Vall ey, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
A rea Code 714
5 40-2910
962-24 11
The following is a brief explanat i o n of the more i mportant,
n on -routine i t~ms which appear on the enclosed a~enda and wh ich
are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant l ists are now en -
closed with the agenda mate rial, summarizing the bills paid since
the August Joint Boa r d meeting .
Joint Boards
No. 8 -a -Approving Plans and Specific ations fo r Administration
and Engineering Buildi ng Add~tion and Remodel , Job No . J -7 -3.
In August , 1975, the Building Committee was appointed to study
the current and futur e o ffi ce space requir ements relative to poss i ble
en l argement of the Board Room, completion of the second floor of the
En gin e ering -Maintenance wi ng a nd additional office space in the
Adminis tration wing. After cons id e r able study by the staff and the
Build ing Committee , c haired by Director Norman Cu l ver , the Committee
rec ommendations were c onsidered and approved by the Boards at their
April, 1976 mee ting and the staff was authorize d to proceed . The
fin a l concept has approximately 3500 square feet of useable area in
t he bui lding which includes increasing the Board Room fr om 1 140
square feet to 1 800 square feet. This pro j ect has been provided for
in the 1976-77 budget in the amo unt of $300 ,000 .
It is rec ommende d that bids be received on October 1 2 , 1 976 ,
wit h possible awar~ at the October Board meeting. Construction
could b e schedu led t o commence November 1, 1976 , with completion
anticipat ed in May , 1977.
No . 8 -b -Award of Specificat i on No . PW -053 , Purchase of
Thirty-Two (32) Digest er Dome Hangers .
Bids f or the purc hase of 32 d i geste r dome hangers were received
on August 3 1, 1976 . Three bids were subm i tted , ranging from a low
of $15,508 to a high of $17,280 . It is recommended that award be
made to Product i on Steel Co., Inc ., o f Ca rs on , California , for the
l o w bid amount of "$15 ,508 for a ll items contained in the proposal ,
t o be used fo r permanently affixing fl o ating domes to the concrete
dige ster s tructure.
No. 8-c -Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 t6 Job No . J -6 -lD .
Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 for Job No . J-6 -l D, Additional Pumping
Facilities for the Foster Ou tfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2 ,
change the bid date from Au gu st 31 to September 7 to allow
additional time for contractors to prepare their bid proposal ,
and incorporat e several technical clarifications which were
suggested by the prospective bidders since the project was adver -
tised. The staff recommends approval of these. addenda .
No . 8-d -Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to Specification No. E-080.
This item appearing on your agenda is for the ·approval of
Addenda Nos. 1 ·and 2 to Specification No . E-080; Three (3) Gear
Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, to
change the bid date from August 24 to August 31 to allow additional
time for _ bid submittal and incorporating several technical clari-
fications requested by the prospective suppliers . The staff recom-
mends approval of these addenda.
No. 8 -e -Change Order·· No.· T to J ·ob No. PW -04 7.
This Change Order is to 'extend the contract time allowance
by 35 days . The contractor obtained and constructed new mo l ds for
this project which included new fiberglass duct work at Headworks
"C" ventilation system at Plant No. 2. These new molds enabled the
contr actor to better comply with the job specific ations and , in
fact, to produce a better quality of duct work than required. The
staff rec ommends acceptance of this Change Orde r, at no cost to t he
Districts, extending the original contract time from 180 days to
2 15 days.
No . 8-f -Accepting J ·ob No . ·pw-047 as· Gomp·1ete.
The contract or for New Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C"
Fresh Air Ventilation System has satisfactorily completed a l l the .
sp~cified work for this project and has complied with all the
contract requirements. The staff recommends acceptance of th.is
job. The action appearing on the agenda also authorizes fi ling
of the Notice of Completion and approves the Final Closeout Agree -
ment.
No. 8-g -Chang e Order No . 1 to Job No. PW-052.
At the August Board meeting, a contract was awarded to
Ins trumentation and Mechanical Systems, Inc., of Fu llerton, for
ins tallation of seven automatic gate operators at t he Plant No . 1
Diversion and Metering Structure. The contract, in the amount of
$22,688, is a small contract and the staff inadvertently inc luded
in the specifications fo r this smal l job, standard insurance re-
quirements in the amount of $3 million, which are the limits for
a maj,or contract. The contractor ha s request ed a reduction of the
requi rement to $1 million and the staff recommends that the Change
Order be approved reducing the required coverage from $3 mil l ion
to $1 million. ·
-2-
No. 8-h -Accepting Job No. J-9 -2 as Complete.
This job to provide for an extension of Surge Tower No. 2
on the 1 20 -inch ocean outfall has been completed in accordance
with all the requirements of the contract, and the staff recom-
mends acceptance of this project. The action appearing in the agenda
authorizes acceptance of the job, filing of the Notice of Completion,
and approving the Final Closeout Agreement .
No. 8-i -Attendance at Int ernational Public Works Congress
and Equipme nt Show September 26-30.
The International Public Works Conference to be held in Las
Vegas, Nevada, September 26 -30, has scheduled several interesting
and informative sessions along with the manufacturers ' e quipment
exhibits . Conferences of this nature have proved to b e extremely
val uabl e to the Districts in planning for future construction
programs, and provide an excellent forum for discussion . The
Districts ' Chief Engineer has attended in the past, as well as
meetings of the American So ciet y of Civil Engineers, to keep
abreast of recent developments and innovatio ns . It is recommended
that the Boards approve attendance of the Joint Chairman and Chief
Engineer at this Conference and authorize expense r eimbursement in
accordance with established policy.
No. 8 -j -Authori zation to N'e gotfat·e· -ro·r Purchase of Two
Used Trucks for S ludge Hauling .
Included in this year's budget is $350,000 for solids handling
and disposal equipment. A portion of this bud get amount wa s antici-
pated to be used for dump trailers and tractors for hauling of
centrifuged sludge to drying areas at both Plant sites . Small dump
trucks are presently being used and they are rapidly approaching
the end of their useful life.
In an attempt to find equipment more suitable for hauling of
wet centrate sludge, which contains approximately 80% water, the
staff has experimented with several methods which included dump
trailers, dump trucks, and transit mix concrete trucks . The latter
method is quite innovated and proved so succ essfu l that the staff
is recomme nding the purchase of two used eight-yard transit-mix
concrete trucks for the purpose of handling the centrifuged sludge
at both plants . Three sources of supply that specialize in th is
type of used equipment have been l ocat ed and we estimate that the
cost will n o t exceed $9,000 per unit, plus applicable sales taxes.
I t i s , therefore, recommended that the General Manager be authorized
to negotiate for purchase of two used eight -yard transi t -mix tru c k s
and to issue a Purchase Orde r for said equipment in an amount not
to exceed $18,000 plus applicable sales and use taxes.
-3-
No. 8-k -Authorizing Purchase of Atomic Absorption Spectro-
photometer.
Included in the 1976-77 budget are funds for the purchase of
an atomic absorption spectrophotometer for use by the laboratory
in connection with implementation of the expanded industrial waste
monitoring prog ram. Our present Model 305 atomic absorption spectro-
photometer was manufactured by Perkin-Elmer Corporation of Santa
Ana. Laboratory personnel have evaluated several comparable in-
struments and have determined that the Perkin-Elmer Model 307-A will
provide greater flexibility than any other instrument in this price
range and also allow for standardization of component parts. This
additional unit will allow analyses of heavy metals and toxic con-
taminents in the industrial waste in connection with enforcement
of the Industrial Waste Ordinance. Our present atomic absorption
equipment is used principally for monitoring the wastewaters
relative to NPDES Permit requirements.
It is, therefore, recommended that the General Manager be
authorized to issue a Purchase Order to Perkin-Elmer Corporation
of Santa Ana for acquisition of a Model 307-A Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometer for the amount of $8,500 plus applicable sales
and use taxes and freight charges.
No. 8-1 -Authorizing Purchase ·or Tn-Sewe·r "Sample·rs for
Industrial Waste Monitoring Program.
The staff has evaluated several commercially-available waste-
water samplers which can be installed in sewers for the purpose of
monitoring the sewer system and the industrial waste contained
therein. After a thorough evaluation, it is recommended that the
staff be authorized to negotiate with ISCO, Environmental Division
of Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of purchasing eleven waste-
water samplers, and to issue a Purchase Order for a maximum amount
. not to exceed $15,000, exclusive of tax and freight,. for said
equipment. Approximately $16,500 was budgeted this _year for samplers
and flow meters · required by the rndustrial Waste Division to imple-
ment the new industrial waste monitoring program.
No. 8-m -Authorizing Purchase of Emerg ency Bypass Piping.
Included in the approved 1976-77 budget is an item in the
amount of $4,427 for purchase of 12-inch aluminum pipe and couplings
for use in temporary emergency bypass operations. Our Purchasing
Division has solicited proposals and determined that only one source
of supply is available for said piping which is compatible with our
existing equipment. It is therefore recommended that .the Manager
be authorized to issue a Purchase Order to Pomona Irrigation Equip-
ment Company in the amount of $4, 964 .97, for acquisition of
approximately 600 feet of 12-inch aluminum pipe and couplings for
emergency bypass piping.
-4-
No. 8-n -Authorizing 1/2 Range Increase in Salary for Chief
of Indu strial Waste .
Mr. John Thomas , Chief of the Industrial Waste Sect i on , has
recently received notification that he has successfully passed the
State examination for registration in civil engineering. In r ecog -
nition of this accomplishment , we are recommend ing that Mr . Thomas
be granted a 1/2 step increase in salary. This recommendation is
consistent with past policy for other members of the Engineering
Department who have successfully passed this State registration
examination. The action appearing on your agenda reclassifies
Mr. Thomas' position from Range 61B ($1,583 to $1~973 ) to Range
62 ($1,627 to $2027) effective September 10, 1976 .
·No. 8-o -Request for Two New Position Classifications .
Clerk ( $4. 4 O Maximum. hourly rate): The Director of Finance
is · recommending that a new entry level clerical position be estab -
lished to provide greater flexibility in salary assignments for
beginning clerical personnel . The r~quest is for the position
classification only and would not result .in authorization for
additional personnel . The new classification is recommended as
it will effect future payroll savings for the Districts .
··Administrative Aide (Range 647C -$844 to $1,026): The Assistant
to th~ Chief Engineer has recently resigned from the Districts and the
posit i on (Range 655A -$1 ,222 to $1,499) will be deleted from the
organizational chart . Certain duties previously assigned to this
classification will not be transferred to other Engineering Depart -
ment personnel . However, it is necessary to reassign the responsi -
bilities for providing and coordinating general public information ,
conducting plant tours and other administrative tasks. The staff
therefor e recommends that the classification and one pos ition of
Administrative Aide be established at the salary rec ommended above
. (Range 647C) which will result in an estimated annual payrol l savings
of $5,676 .
The action appearing on the agenda autho r iz es the addition of
the above two classifications and one pos it ion t o the Districts '
Positions and Salaries resolution effective September 10th.
Dis trict No. 2
No. 8-p -Acceptin Grant of Easement from Ernest Bryant et al
re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts 2 -1 -and 2 -1 -5 .
The District 's staff , consulting engineer and General Counsel
working within the guidelines of the appraisal prepared for the '
Santa Ana River Interceptor, have concluded t he negotiations for
the right of way for the permanent and temporary easements for the
Santa Ana River Interceptor from Yorba Regional Park to the Gre en
River Golf Course. The permanent easement is 30 ' in width and the
temporary easement is 90 ·' in Width . The cost of both will be
-5-
shared by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority in accordance
with their agreement with the District relative to the interceptor.
The agreement provides for compensation to the property owner for
removal and loss of production of citrus trees, in addition to the
compensation for temporary use of the construction easement and
the permanent use of the sewer easement.
The staff recommends approval of the Purchase and Sale Agree-
ment and acceptance of the Grant of Easement, and authorization
for payment of $42,030 as set forth in said agreement prepared
by the General Counsel.
No. 8-q-r-s-t -Change Orders Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 10 to Contract
No. 2-14-4, Santa Ana River Intercept or.
These four change orders conclude the additional work and
modifications to the specifications for completion of this major
reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor which extends from La
Palma Avenue and Imperial H1ghway to Gypsum Canyon.
Change Order No. 7 in ttte amount of $1,423.82, is for water-
line utility interference and for the relocation of three manholes
as requested by the Yorba Linda County Water District to better
accommodate future connections anticipated to serve their local
sewer system.
Change Order No. 8, in the amount of $8,320, is for rental costs
sustained by the contractor as a result of delays encountered in the
coordination and scheduling of the contract work for the Yorba
Regional Park and this reach of the Santa Ana River Interceptor.
The District's contractor was directed to proceed on the basis of
a proposed schedule by the County 's Environmental Management Agency
which, because of circumstances beyond the control of the EMA, they
w~re unable to meet. The cost of this extra work is for standby of
the rental equipment necessary to construct the interceptor through
the Yorba Regional · Park. -
I
Change Order No. 9 is for additional costs in the amount of
$6,808.0l incurred by the contractor while boring at the intersection
of La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway because of encountering a
low sewer of the City of Anaheim which was constructed to a grade
different than that shown on the as-built plans of the City.
Change Order No. 10 i s the normal change order for the adjust-
ment of engineer's quantities of the actual work performed. This
change order is for a net deduction in the amount of $2,953.
It should be noted that all change orders have been approved
by the State and that the grant program will pay their proportionate
share of this additional cost. Total change orders for this project
are in the amount of approximately $79,574 , which is less than 2/10
of 1 % of the original contract price. The staff recommends acceptance
of these change orders totaling a net addition to the contract of
$13,598.83.
-6-
No. 8 -u -Accepting Contract No . 2 -14-4 as Com ple te.
This contract ·ror the installation of the Santa Ana River
Interceptor from the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Imperial
Highway, which spans a distance of approximately 26 ,000 feet , is
complete and the contractor has complied with all provi sions of
the contract. Work has been i nspected by the District 's staff and
consulting engineer and all requirements of the affected property
owner s (Ernest Bryant, et a l; Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company;
City of Anaheim) have been met . The contractor has dilig ent ly
prosecuted the work and has completed this contract 142 days
ahead of schedule . The State Water Resources Control Board has
inspect ed this i~stallation during the course of construction and
has verbally commended the contractor and the staff for the com-
pletion of this Regional Interceptor Sewer . The staff recommends
adoption of the resolution included in the agenda material authoriz -
ing filing of the Notice of Completion and execution of a Final
Closeout Agreement .
No. 8 -v -Rec·eive ; File ·and· De·ny Fo·r ·m:a l Prot est and Claim of
Contractor Regarding Contract· No .· 2 -T6-2·,-· Yorba Linda Force Main .
The contractor, in perform i ng the work for installation of the
Yorba Linda Force Main , was directed by the staff to comply with
the specifications to backfill certain areas excavated within the
street right of way within certain time limi ts to mitigate the
i mpacts. on commercial developments within the City o f Fullerton .
Th e c ontractor was instructed to cease construct i on operations on
the force main sewer until such time as the backfi ll operations
had been successfully completed .
The contractor has filed a c l a im in the amount of $67,960 .85
for costs inc urre d during this "shut-down " of operation . The Chief
Engineer has denied the contractor's claim and , i n accordance with
Section 8 -4 of th e Standard Specifications for this contract , the
contractor is filing a formal protest with the Board for their con -·
sideration . Copies of the contractor 's claim and the Chief Engineer 's
denial of said claim a r e included in your agenda mater~al .
It is recommended that the claim be denied and that the Board
uphold the Chief Engineer 's final decision .
Di s tri ct No. 3
No. 8 -w -Change Order No. 1 to Contract No . 3 -BR -l .
Thi s change order i s for a t ime allowance of 68 calendar days
to the contract for Manhole Replacement , Los Al amitos Subtrunk . The
contract or experienced delays due to lack of availability of spec i fied
materials for the job . Th e project is for replacement o~ two man -
h o l es and the contractor was working at the Di str~ct 's direction to
replac e the manholes while allowing continu e d operation of the sewer
system . The staff recommends ·approval of this change ord e r for a
time extension . ·
-7-
No. 8-x -Accepting Job No. 3 -8R -l as Complete .
The contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has
completed the replacement of the two ma nholes on the Los Alamitos
Subtrunk required on this job and complied with all t he contract
requirements. The staff, therefore, recommends acceptance of the
work as complete, filing of th e Notice of Completion, and approva l
of the Final Closeout Agreement .
No . 8 -y -Autho riz ing Negotiation of En g ineering Fee for Design
of Westside F o rce Main , Second Phase.
The District 's staff has monitored increasing flows being re -
ceived by the Seal Beach Boulevard Pumping Station and has determined
that the second force main unit to transport se wa ge from this pump -
ing station to the Knott Intercept qr ·sewer should now be constructed
in · accordance with the Ma~ter Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No . 3 .
In the recently -adopted budget, $920,000 was included for this project .
The Boards-adopted policy for the selection of professiona l
engineering services provides that when a consulting engineer has
satisfact or ily compl eted one phase in the development of a project
and the Board determines that it would be in the best interest of
the District to r e tain this firm for subsequent phases of the work,
then the Se lection Committee may proceed directly with fee ne got i a -
t i ons with the engineer. This provision is particularly applicable
and generally most cost-effective when a firm has completed a Master
Plan Report and is thoroughly familiar with the needs and similar
projects of the District . This j ob should be expedited because o f
the very favorable bids being submitted by contractors on sewer
construction work at this time .
Boyle Engineering Corporat i on prepared the District 's Master
Plan and de signed the facilities to wh ich this force _main will
connect. It is, t herefore, r ecommended that the staff be authorized
to negotiate directly with said firm for services to prepare the
plans and specif1cations for this project .
District No. 5
No. 8 -z & aa -Chang e Order Nos. 1 and 2 t o Contract No. 5 -20A .
The~e change orders are f or the purchase of approximately 1 ,000
additional linear feet of 24 -inch Class 50 ductile iron pipe and
appurtenant fittings which will extend the cast iron portion of t h e
sewer fr om the Back Bay right of way along Big Canyon to the Jam boree
Pump Station . After discussions with the affected agencies , in-
cluding the Departme n t of Fish and Game, the City of Newport Beac h
and the Coastal Commission , and after a thorough review of the
archaeologi st 's rep ort for this facility, it was decided that it
would be in the best interest o f all concerned if the project were
revised to construct this portion in cast iron pipe in lieu of the
-8-
original propo sed vitrified clay pipe. This material will oe
furnished to the contractor that will in st al l the pipe for which
bids are to be received on September 14th. The staff rec ommends
approval of these change orde rs in the total amount of $24,285.62 .
No . 8 -bb -Authorizing General Manag er t 6 Award Contract No .
5-20 -Back Bay Trunk Sewer .
Bid s f or the installat ion of the sewer pipe purchased for the
Back Bay Trunk Sewer are schedu l ed to be received on September 1 4 ,
which i s after the September 13 hearing on this project by the
Regional Board of the Ca lifornia Coastal Zone Conservation Com-
mission. The staff and consulting engineers have reviewed this
project with all affected agencies and have incorporated into the
plans and specifi cations those requirements necessary to meet the
needs of those agencies. Since it is critical t o complete the con-
struct ion of this facility before December 1 , 1976, it wi ll be
necess ary to award a contract after receipt of the Coastal Com -
mission approval but pr~or to the Oc tober Board mee ting.
It i s, therefore, recommended that the General Manager be
authorized to award the cont r act for the bids to be received and
opened, in an amount not to exceed $275 ,000 , upon approval of the
project by the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission .
District No . 7
No. 8 -cc -Initiation of Annexation Procee d ing s -·Annexation
No. 57 -Tract No. 925.
·Last month , the Board r eferred a request for the annexation of
7.849 acres in the Lemon Heights area in unincorporated territory
to the staff for study and recommendation . The proposed development
meets the District 's low dens i ty residentia l criteria established
for this area in the District 's Maste r Plan . The staf f rec ommen ds
that the Board adopt Resolution No . 76 -170 -7 , initiating annexation
proceedings.
No. 8 -dd -Initiation of Annexation Proceed ings -Annexation
No. 58, Baker Annexation.
At the August Board meeting, the Board referred to the staff
fo r recommendation , a request for annexation of 1 3 .410 acres located
northwest of Peters Canyon , adjacent to Sirrine Drive in the unincor -
porated area outside Di strict No . 7 . The proposed d e velopment meets
the District's l ow density resid ential criteria established for this
area in the Di strict 's Master Plan a nd the r efore the staff recommends
that the Board adopt Resolution No . 76-171-7 initiating annexat i on
proceedings .
No. 8 -ee -Ordering Annexation No .· 48 -Tract No . 5369 .
This item appearing on the agenda orders the annexation of
-9-
6.647 acres to the District, which i s northwest of Peters Canyon
Road adjacent to Sirrine , Mira Vis ta and Ove r hill Dr i ves in the
u nincorporated territory of the District. The Board authorized
initiation of proceedings for annexation in March , 1 976 . LAFCO
approval has been received and the proponent has paid the required
fees. It is the staff 's recommendation that Resolution No . 76 -172-7
be approved .
No. 8-ff -Request for Annexat i on ·-·Tract No . 9072 .
The District haE received a formal request for annexation of
10.04 acres which i.s locat ed on the south side of Bond Avenue 660
f eet east of Rancho Santiago in the City of Orange . It is recom-
mended that the request of the property owner be referred to the
staff for report and recommendation to the Board .
No . 8 -gg & hh -Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 to Contract No . 7 -6 -9 .
Change Order No . 1 is for addition of backfill material as re -
quire d in the specifications at the bid stipulated unit price for
a total of $9,1 36, and replacement of a private roadway and barricade
rental in the amount of $6 ,191 , which was deleted from the original
bid document but would have normally been included as part of the
original work required of the contractor. Change Orde r No. 2 for
adjustments of engineer 's quantities is a deduction of $425 .80 .
These chang e orders increase the original amount of the contract
by a net of $14,901 .20 , or approximately 5%. The staff recommends
approval.
No . 8 -ii -Accepting Contract No . 7~6-9 a~ ·complete .
The contractor , Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has completed
the installation of this portion of the Tustin -Orang~ Trunk Sewer
and has complied with all requirements of the contract documents .
7500 feet of 24 -inch, 21-inch, and 18 -inch diameter pipe was in-
stalled in the El Modena area, beginning at the intersection of
Spring Street and Santiago Boulevard and terminating at Linda Vista
and Santiago in the City of Orange. The staff recommends adoption
of t he resolution attached to the agenda ma teria l authorizing the
filin g of a Notice of Completion and execution of a Final Closeout
Agreement . It should be noted that the contractor completed this
contract within the time allotted for the project , 56 days prior
t o the exp iration date. This project completes the Tust in-Orange
Trunk Sewer within the present District No. 7 boundaries .
District No. 11
No. 8 -j j -Chan ge Order No . 2 to Contract No . 1 1 -lR-l .
This change order adjusts the engineer 's quantities for a tota l
-10-
deduction of $731 . The origina l plans specified that the contractor
r epa i r a manhole in the State Highway (Beach Boulevard) .and the work
was delayed by the State Department of Transportation for an encroach-
ment permit to inspect the manhole. After thorough examination of
the manhole, it was found that it would not need repair and was,
therefore, deleted from the contract . The staff recorrunends approva l
of this change order.
No . 8-kk -Acceptance of Contract No . 11-l R-l.
The contractor, Rewes Schock, has completed. the repair or
replacement of manholes on the Newland Delaware Trunk and has com-
p l ied with all requirements of the contract documents. With deletions
and adjustments, the final contract cost was $1,871 lower than the
original contract price, or approximately 5% under the original con -
tract amount . The staff recommends adoption of the resolution
attached to the agenda material authorizing f iling of the Notice of
Completion and execution of. a Final Closeout Agreement.
Each District
No. 10 -Establishing 1976 -77 Use Charge Fees for Class I and
Class II Industrial Waste Dischargers.
The Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance, which became effective
Ju l y 1st of this year, provides that the respective Boards establish
unit charges to industrial dischargers for conveying, treating and
disposing of sewage through the Districts' facilities based upon the
annual bud get . Class I industrial dischargers are the major indus -
tries in the County which will discharge volumes in excess of 50,000
ga l lons per day or discharge wastewaters whic h have a strength 50%
greater than domestic sewage or are discharging constituents that
are considered incompatible with the Districts' sewerage system .
Class II dischargers are the industries which discharge mor e
than 10,000 gallons per day but less than 50,000 gallons per day
and are not required to obtain a Class I permit because their dis -
charge has been determined to be compatible with the Districts'
sewerage system .
Inasmuch as both Class I and II permitt ees are credited in the
amount of the annual ad valorem tax levied by the Districts upon
the property for which the permit has been iss ued by the District,
exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service, each
individual District must adopt separate resolutions establishing
the use charges because of the varying tax rates within the individual
Districts . Now that the 1976 -77 budg ets have b een approved and tax
rates set, it is appropriate for the Boards to adopt the resolution
appearing on the agenda purs uant to provisions set forth in Section
302 .6 and 303 .1 of the Industrial Waste Ordinance, for Class I and
Cl ass II permittees for the respective Districts as follows:
-11 -
USE CHARGE RATES
Cl ass I Cl a ss II
Flow SS BOD
Dist r i ct # $/MG $/1 000 Lbs $/1 0 0 0 Lbs $/MG
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
i22.oo 13.20 .7.10 17 5
131.00 14 .30 7.70 187
129.00 1 4 .00 7.60 185
129.00 14.00 7 .60 1 8 5
1 19.00 13.00 7 .00 17 0
12 2.00 1 3 .30 7 .20 1 7 4
1 36 .00 14.80 8.00 1 94
All Districts
No. 1 1 -Value Engineering for Job No. P2 -23, 75 MGD Activated
Sludge Treatment Faci lities at Plant No . 2 .
A recent regulation promulgated by the Environmental Protection
Agency that affects the construction g rant programs is the provision
that all projects in excess of $10 million are subject to value
engineering procedures to insure that the facilities are constructed
in· accordance with the best ava ilable technology and construction
procedures . Regulations stipulate that value engineering must be
performed by an independent engineering firm, not associated with
the de sign engineer .
A two~phase procedure for the value eng i neering on the $60
mil lion Improved Treatment Facil ities project a t Plant No . 2 was
approved in concept by the Boards at the June 9 th meeting . Phase I
wil l involve the evaluation of the process and operation associated
with the oxygen activated sludge portion of these facilities. In -
cl uded in the agenda material is a staff r eport to be submitted to
the State and EPA for their approval . However , to cont i nue on our
schedule to submit ·the plans and specifications to the State in
April of next year as required by the construction g rant program, it
is necessary to employ a firm for said work prior to the October
Board meeting . It i s, therefore, recommended that th e Selection
Committ ee be authorized to negotiate a fee with Consoer Towns end and
Associates in accordance with the policy adopted by the Boards for
the employment of professional eng ineering services , and that the
District No . 1 Board be authorized to award a contract for value
engineering se rvic es at an adjourned Board meet~ng on September 22.
-12 -
' .
Phase II will emphasize the construction and maintenance
value engineering and employ outside contracting consu lt ants to
work with several key personnel on the Districts' staff and will
be considered at a later date. It has previously bee n reported
to the Boards that both phases of value engineering for this
project will not exceed $175,000, which is grant f u ndable by the
State and EPA.
No. 12 -Award of Contract No. J-6-lD, Additional Pumping
Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station.
At the August Board meeting, the Directors approved the plans
and specifications for .the installation of pumps , e ngines and gear
boxes at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. The major equipment
has been purchased under separate contracts approved by the Boards.
Since bids for these additional pumping facilities at the Foster
Outfall Booster Station will not be received until next Tuesday ,
September 7th, the reports of the bid opening will be included in
the Wednesday supplemental agenda for the Boards ' consideration .
The engineer's estimate ·for this work is $310 ,000 . ·
Districts 1 and 7
No. 13 -Approval of Final Environmental Impact Report and
Plans and Specifications for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 1-1 .
The actions appearing on the agenda formally acknowledge the
comments received on the Draft Environmental I mpact Report (received
by the Boards in July) for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer , which ex -
tends from Sunflower Avenue to Myrtle Avenue along Raitt Street in
the City of Santa Ana and approves the Final EIR. The staff and/or
District's engineer have been in contact wit h the Publi c Works
Depa rtments of all agencies affected and have not receive d any
significant adverse comments. Therefore, it is recommende d t ha t
the Final EIR be approved.
Also appearing under this item is approval of the plans and
specifications as prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation und er
contract with the District . Approval of the plans and specifica-
tions and authorization to receive bids on October 5, 1976, is
recommended. The engineer's estimate for this project i s $1,405,000 .
Distric't No. 2
No. 22 -En g ineering Services for the Feasibil ity Report Re:
Sleepy Hollow Carbon Canyon Drainage Area .
Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter received from the
State Water Resources Control Board approving the Plan of St udy and
-13-
_, .
the cost associated ther e wi th for the Sl eepy Hollow-Carbon
Canyon d r a i nage study . We have several proposals and the
Selec tion Committee , i n accordance with the Board pol i cy f or the
select i on of pro f essional engineering services, will meet next
week on September 7th with the firm which appears to be the best
qualified to perform the required services . The Selection Com -
mittee will present their recommendations to the Board for con -
s iderat i on on Wed n esday evening.
Distr i ct No. 5
No . 24 -Annexation No . 7 -Newport~I rvine Coastal Area .
Thi s r equest by The Irvine Company proposes the annexation
of approximately 3430 acres of the down -coast territory between
Newport Beach and Buck Gully Wash . The proposal was discussed
at an adjourned Board meeting held August 12 at the Newport Beach
Cit y Council Chambers when the Di rectors endorsed Alternate V of
t he s t aff report cons i dered at that time . Enclosed with your
agenda materia l i s a l etter from the property owner requesting
annexation in accordance with said Al ternate and providing a letter
of credit for payment of $2 ,139 ,790 as annexation fees for the 1535
acres designated to be developed within the proposed annexation
area . The Irvine Company has previously submitted application to
t he Local Agency Formation Commission in order that the item can
be heard before the Commission at their regular September 22nd
meeting.
The Genera l Counse l is drafting an agreement re conditions
of annexation as directed by the Board on August 12, and will
report on same at the meeting on Wednesday .
Following the General Counsel 's report , the Board may set
final conditions by approving or amending the. draft agreement with
The Irvine Company and then proceed with initiation of annexation
by adoption of a resolution incorporating said conditions .
District No . 7
No . 27 -Further Considerat i on of Proposed Annexation of Orange
Park Acres .
Enclos e d with the agenda materia l is a report from the General
Counsel regarding the remaining procedura l , legal and administrative
matters that must be considered by the Board in order to culminate
t he annexation and development of the sewer system in the Orang e
Park Acres area . Following a review by the General Counsel, the
Board may wish to take further actions i n this regard as deemed
appropriate by the Directors.
-1 4 -
II
['.OAP.DS OF Dlr!~CTOr:S
County Sanifdion Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
MEETING DATE
SEPTEMBER 8J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
ADJOURNMENTS PUSTED •• t('
COMP & M!LEAf;t. .... ':'.".".: .....•
FILES S~.'i UP ....... k.:". ....... .
RESCLUl IC'.'!S CERTIFIHi;.V
LETIEr:S ';;R!TTEN ...... .' ..... ..
MINUTES VJRlTTt::N .... k. ... .
MINUTES HLED ....... ~ .•
( 4) Consideratfcm-.. o_f motioi:i_-to-~~nd· .fi-le-~excerpt:-s ;-if any.
'· '--~ee supplemental ---~fgenda
(5) EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
4't\/S District 1 August 11, 1976 regular
ti\ I <::> District 2 August 11, 1976 regular
IV\' s
District 3 -August 11, 1976 regular
~\\~ District 5 August 11, 1976 regular and
August 12, 1976 adjourned
.~\I~ District 6 -August 11, 1976 regular and
August 12, 1976 adjourned
:)\\ ~ District 7 August 11, 1976 regular
/i\\ ~ District 11 -August 11, 1976 regular
.......... J.?.) ALL DISTRICTS
l!'ffeR .............. Reports of:
r-(~),) Joint Chairman A/C •••• TKLR .-•• w-.. .L.l.~.~.~.~ 'L ((~ General Manager
I ..._.....---·-········· .'fer: General Counsel
'· /
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
ROLL CALL VOTE ••• _ the joint and individual Districts as fol lows: (Each Director shal 1
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
..._,. District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" and "E"
DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "C" and "F"
DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 8(A) THROUGH 8(KK)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further .explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent ·Calendar. ~ + _j
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
1.~LE, .• ~ .••.......••
LETIER ••..•..•.•..••
A/C ••.• TKLR ••••
i~~~~
FILE •..••...•...••••••
~-':' k l.__L~j&-~ ts=···-
A/C .... TKLR .
°t~J .. .-.. ~f.:-_._ ... .:
~ 2 ... i~.~~~·--
FILE ............•.....
LETTER ...•......•.••
A/C •••• TKLR .•..
---··-····-··· ....
FILE ................ ..
LETTER ••••••••••••••
A/C •.•. TKLR ••••
FILE ···········-···-
LETTE$. •. ~-
we .... TKLR ··-
-~~-~:.~
FILE ·······-····-·-
LETTER ·······-··-
A/C .... TKLR -
FILE ·······-··--
LETTER' ......... ~
A/C .... TKL~ ....
~-~~~:.'.":~----~
FILE ···········-··-
LETTER ·······-··-
A/C .... TKLR ••••
-········-······-···-·
,,..._ .................. _...,..
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-149, approving plans
and specifications for Administration-Engineering Building
Addition and Remodel, Job No. J-7-3, and authorizing
advertising for bids to be received on October 12, 1976
See page "G"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-150, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Purchase of Thirty-Two (32) Digester Dome Hangers, Specification
No. PW-053, to Production Steel Co., Inc., in the amount
of $15,508.00. See pages "H" and "I"
(c) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the
plans and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping
Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD
(d) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans
and specifications for Three (3) Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation
of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080
(e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to 'the
plans and specifications for New Fiberglass Ductwork for
Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System, Job No. PW-047,
granting a time extension of 35 calendar days to the contract
with Beverly Pacific Corporation to allow construction of new
molds to produce higher quality ductwork. See page "J"
(f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-151, accepting New Fiberglass
Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System, Job
No. PW-047, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page
II K" .
{(;)
1 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the J plans and specifications for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion
Structure at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, authorizing a reduction
in the insurance coverage requirements for the contract with
Instrumentation and Mechanical Systems, Inc., from $3 million
to $1 million. See page "L"
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-152, accepting Surge Tower No. 2
Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, as complete;
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M"
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman and Chief
Engineer to attend the International Public Works Congress and
Equipment Show to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada on September 26-30,
1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and
incidental expenses incurred in accordance with established policy
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
'~11iE ·: ....... k ...... .
LETIER ..•..•..••••••
.._.,. A/C .•.. TKLR .•••
D 0 -\,.,. ~~~~~:
FILE ••••.. ~ .•...••..••
LETTER ..••••••...•••
A/C ...• TKLR .•••
... i: .. ;.:~i ... :!.~ ' ',
FILE ••••• : •••.•.•..• -
LmER ............••
AfC ;···!KLR .•••
'( -. I-~
°NJI:·r:t:o··~
-·-······-·-····
FILE ...•.••.••••••..••
FILE ·······-··-··-
LETTER ···········-·
A/C .... TKLR ••••
.._.,. FILE -~~~~~~:~:::::::::··-·
LETTER ·····-·······
A/C .... TKLR •..•
.................... ____ ___ -................. ___ .
FILE ···············-,--......
Ci.fll'.!R .• : ..•........•
A/C .... TKLR ••••
'?~r;, -~
FILE ···········-·····
LETTER ••.•••••.••••
A/C .... TKLR ··-
FILE ···············-
LETTER ············-
A/C .... TKLR ••••
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(j) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate for
purchase of two used transit mix trucks for sludge hauling,
and to issue a purchase order for acquisition of said equipment
in an amount not to exceed $18,000.00 plus tax
(k) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of a purchase
order to Perkin-Elmer Corporation for acquisition of a Model
'3'J°'P.. ~Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer, in the amount of
$8,500.00 plus tax and freight
(1) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate with
ISCO, Environmental Division of Lincoln, Nebraska, for acquisition
of 11 in-sewer wastewater samplers, and to issue a purchase order
for a total amount not to exceed $15,000.00 plus tax and freight
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
issue a purchase order to Pomona Irrigation Equipment Company
for acquisition of emergency bypass piping and couplings in
the amount of $4,964.97
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-153, amending Positions and
Salaries Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, authorizing a 1/2
range adjustment from Range 61B ($1,583 to $1,973) to Range 62
($1,627 to $2,027) for the position of Chief of Industrial
Waste effective September 10, 1976, in recognition of achieving
professional engineer's registration. See page "N"
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-154, amending Positions and
Salaries Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, authorizing addition
of two new personnel classifications. See page "0"
DISTRICT 2
(p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-165-2, approving agreement re
Purchase and Sale of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easements,
and accepting Grantsof Easement from Ernest A. Bryant, Jr., et al.
in connection with construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor
Sewer, Contracts Nos. 2-14-4 and 2-14-5; and authorizing payment
in the amount of $14,550.00 for permanent easement, $13,500.00 for
temporary easement and $13,980.00 for damaged or removed citrus trees,
as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "P"
(q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5,
Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an addition of $1,423.82 to the
contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. for
utility interference and relocation of certain manhole stations.
See page "Q"
(r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans
and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5,
Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an addition of $8,320.00 to the
contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc. for
extra costs to coordinate construction of the interceptor with
Environmental Management Agency through the County's Yorba
Regional Park. See page "R"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
FILE •.•..•.•...•••••
LEITER --·········
A/C •.•. TKLR ••
FILE .•....•.••..•.•.
LETTER ···-··-···
A/C .... TKLR •
FILE •••.••...•••..•••
c__~rr"ER0. ...... .
A /C ...• TKLR •••
.. ~
FILE ···-··-·······-
lETIER ·······-·
A/C •... TK LR ·-
FILE ···-···········-
LETTER .••.•••••.••••
A/C •..• TKLR ••••
.............................
Fll.E ·····-······-
~~---····
A /C .•.. TKlR ••••
... ~-~
G~~~;:~:?
LETTER ···········-·
A/c .. @ .:.
DISTRICT 2 (Continued)
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the
plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Intercept or,
Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an addition of
$6,808.01 to the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods
& Sons, Inc. for extra work re improperly disclosed City of
Anaheim local sewer. See page "S"
(t) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 10 to the
plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor,
Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $2,953.00 from
the contract with Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc.
See page "T"
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-166-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, as complete;
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. See page "U"
(v) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Formal .Protest
and Claim filed by Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., in the
amount of $67,960.85, in connection with construction of
Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No . 2-16-2. See page "V"
(2) Consideration of motion to deny Formal Protest and Claim of
Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc . and to· uphold the final decis ion
of the Chief Engineer with regard to said prot est and claim
fi led in connection with construction of Yorba Linda Force
Main, Contract No. 2-16-2 . See page "W"
DISTRICT 3
(w) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and s pecifications for Ma nhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk,
Contract No. 3-8R-l, granting a time extension of 68 calendar
days to th e contract with George Miller Construction Company due
to avai lability and delive ry of mat erials . See page "X"
(x) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-167-3, accepting Manhole
Repl acement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contrac·t No. 3-8R-l, as
complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "Y"
C .d . f . h . . h '~~~ onsi eration o motion aut orizing t e to n e gotiate an
engineering fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
design of the Westside Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Force
Main, Second Unit
(CONSENT CAL ENDAR continued on page 6)
-5-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 5)
FILE ................ .
lETTER ............ .
A/C .... TKLR •.•
---··········-··-··-
---··--·················
FiLE ......... : ....... .
LETTER ............. .
A/C .... TKLR ... .
DISTRICT 5
(z) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material
Purchase Only), Contract No. 5-20A, authorizing an addition of
$23,980.57 to the contract with U. S. Pipe and Foundry Company
for additional ductile iron pipe and fittings. See page "Z"
(aa) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material
Purchase Only), Contract No. 5-20A, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities for an addition of $304.05 to the
contract with U. S. Pipe and Foundry Company. See page "M" . ·c·· _ ..... 1,,1, ·:JP
\ . .: . . FILE ....... -·-···· (bb)
... ;
, LETTER ·-····-··-... -.....__ __ ,
FILE ••••.•••••.••••••
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-169-5, authorizing the General
Manager to award contract for Back Bay Trunk Sewer, From Newport
Dunes to Jamboree Pump Station, Contract No. 5-20, to the lowest
responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $275,000.00,
upon approval by the California Coastal.J Conservation Commission
See page "00" ., "
DISTRICT 7
lLETTElr b. . ..... (CC) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-170-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 7.849 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of Ranch Hill and Las Luces in the
Lemon Heights area (Proposed Annexation No. 57 -Tract No. 8295
to County Sanitation District No. 7)
FILE ······--· .. -·-
lE~f~'~
A/C •••• TKLR -·· ~I' ,:~i_r ~ (>,.c·t.6' ···-····--··-··--..,...···-
-·-------------
FILE ·····~···~ .. ·:···! .· -·· ... :::. , I , '-.!::l!ERS. .. ~~-
A/C .... TKLR ··-
................. ._ ....... _.
file' ..... ~
LETTER ····-···-
A/C ~L~,§~~
FILE ................. .
LETTER .-.. ·--···-
A/C .... TKLR ••••
(dd)
(ee)
(ff)
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-171-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex 13.410 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity northwest of Peters Canyon Road,
adjacent to Sirrine, Mira Vista and Overhill Drives (Proposed
Annexation No. 58 -Baker Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7)
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-172-7, ordering
annexation of 6.647 acres to the District in the vicinity of
Overhill and Mira Vista Drives (Anne~ation No. 48 -Tract No. 5369
to County Sanitation District No. 7)
Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Hillcrest
Village for annexation of 10.04 acres of territory to the District
in the vicinity of Bond Avenue and Rancho Santiago Boulevard, and
refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "BB"
(gg) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion
of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, authorizing
an addition of $15,327.00 to the contract with Sully-Miller
Contracting Company for backfill and replacement of roadway.
See page "CC"
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 7)
-6-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 6)
FILE ············-··-
LETTER ···--··-
A/C •... TKLR _
....................... ___
----·--·-··-·-···-·--
FILE ···········-··-· -..
LETTEJE •• ,.: •• J: •. _
A/C .•.. TKLR ·-· r~::.~-~---g_·~---
REVISED
F:LE ------
LETTER ···--·-
A/C ••.• TKLR ·-·
.._,, FILE .•.••.•••..•••.•••
LETTER_s: ••.••. v. ..•. ...____
A/C .... TKLR .•••
-~~ ... ~;~: .. i ...... .
DISTRICT 7 (Continued)
(hh) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,
Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total
deduction of $425.80 from the contract with Sully-Miller
Contracting Company. See page 'f})D"
(ii) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-173-7, accepting Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract
No. 7-6-9, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "EE"
DISTRICT 11
(jj) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair,
Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l, authorizing an
adjustment of engineer's quantities and granting a time extension
of 39 calendar days to the contract with Rewes-Schock, JV due to
the delay in receiving encroachment permit from Caltrans. See
page "FF" for a total deduction of 7 31. 00
(kk) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-174-11, accepting Manhole
Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l,
as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "GG"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
-7-
-.
·~ EACH DISTRICT
Consideration of the f o llowing resolutions
Roll Call Vote or Cast Class I and Class II p ermi trees pursuant to
Unan imous Ballot Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use
e stablishing u se charges f or
prov is i ons of the uniform
of Distric t Sewerage Facilities
"HH" FILE ...•..•.•....•••.•
o f the respective Districts: See page -----
lffiE ~ .. ~J:.:" Class I Fee
A/C ••.• TKLR •••• District No. Resolution No . Flow B .O.~.S. Class II Fee
.l'f\) "::>
ii\\'::,
1
2
3
5
6
7
76-155-1
76-156-2
76-157-3
$122.
131.
129.
$13.20 $7 .10 $175 .
14.30 7.70 187.
14.00 7 .60 185.
l'''I ">
,'Vqs.
NjS
J\ltl.5
f'\ t ':>
76-158-5
76-159-6
76-160-7
11 76-161-11
129 . 14 .00 7.6 0 185.
119. 13 .00 7.0 0 170.
122 . 13.30 7.20 174.
136 . 14 .80 8 .00 194.
(11) FILE ................ .. ALL DISTRICTS
LffiER ............. .
A/C .••• TKLR .. ..
m E ···········Ni}'S
LETTE R .•..•.•.•.. J
~IC ...• TKLR .••.
Cons i deration of engaging firm to provide value e n g in eeri ng s e r vices t o as sure
cost-effective de s ign of 75 MGD Activated Sl u dge Treatm ent Faci l itie s at
Treatment Plant No . 2 in accordance with State and Fe d e ral guid e lines (ap prove d
in concept by ·the Joint Bo ards on June 9, 1976):
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file s taff r eport re ·
s e lection of engin eering firm to provide s aid value engine ering
services. Se e page "II"
--·····:····-1\°ftS Cb) ~orr-·ca11 Vote or Cast
Con s idera tion of Resolution No . 76-175, author i z ing the Sel e ction
Committee to negotiate fee with Con s oer_, Townse nd & Associates t o prov i d e
value engin e ering services in conjunction with d es ign of 75 MG D
LEffiR ....... Unanimous Ball ot
A/C .... TKL R .•..
.:L.9..,.~.1-~ a.wo.)\J.~
·.:J~r:t::.~ ..-
Activated Sludge Tr e atment Facilit i es at Tr eat ment Plant No. 2, in
accordance with adopted District p r o c edures; a nd au thorizing District
No. 1 to aw a rd c ontract for said servic e s. Se e page· "JJ"
( 12) ALL DISTRICTS
ITEMS ON
(12) Other business and communications or suppl eme ntal a genda items:
SUPPLfM ENTAL AGENDA (1~ &\\\~ ~
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot !ft
F~z··""'" ETTER ········-
A/C •... TKLR ••••
~.P ... ~-~£-'""' ~A~P..JR. .. J:.j)p.J-J .•
Consideration of Resolution No. 76_.162, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall
Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-10 , to Skipper & Company in the
amount of $ 341~791.00. See pages "A" and "B"
-8-
(13) DISTRICTS 1 & 7
Consideration of actions relative to the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer:
1·1/11~ 11 .
(a)
FILE ~tf.w'-.~
LmER ···-····--·
AIC .... TKLR ••••
..... -........... -......... ____ _
--............. ____ f-..
FILE ··········f··· ...
LmER ···~/········
A/C .... TKL ..•.
·······-·········· ...... (b)
.................. .! ..... .
I . !!~E. ···~····l··--··-
(__~~~-···+-··-( c)
A/C .... TK~ ·-·
-············-~··-·
-··--·········\······
~
.... ~d)
FILE --~-~tl...~i!.~L.Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
LETTER •..........••• _. -.,.
Consideration of motion to receive and file comments from
the following agencies relative to the Draft Environmental
Impact Report for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer: (incorporated
into addendum of Final EIR)
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
City of Irvine
County of Orange Environmental Management Agency
City of Santa Ana
C. J. Segerstrom & Sons
Southern California Air Pollution Control District
City of Tustin
Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer
(Copy enclosed with agenda material)
Consideration of motion approving the project for Raitt Street
Trunk Sewer and directing the Secretary to file a Notice of
Determ~nation for said project in accordance with the Districts'
·Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality.Act
of 1970, as amended
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-163, approving·plans and specifica-
tions for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, From Sunflower Avenue to Myrtle
Street, Contract No. 1-14, and authorizing advertising for bids to
be received on October 5, 1976. See page "KK"
A/C .... Ttq.R ···~· 0.;~ i-r ,~ •. -:~ ... :. ..... -... , ........ 14) DI~RICT 1
-................... _ Oth~r .b_µsj.ness ana COmmLl:r:!_!~ations OT ·supp~mentalagenda i terns' if any
FILE .••.•..•.•..••• .fl5)
LETIER .•••.•••••••••
A/C .... TKLR ••••
...................... .-< 16.)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
FILE ............... -
~ER ............. .
..., (21) A/C .... TKLR .•••
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., September 22, 1976 2·.l1
DISTRICT 3
--------Other business -and comnninications--or -supplementalag-enda items, if any
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn f · .-1~
DISTRICT 6 ~-----.. --~-----·--~~ 'Other business and __ commun1cat1on"S---Or--suppl emental agenda 1 terns, if any
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·: ;i. :J_
D!.STRICT 11 ~--____ _ / Ofhe~business ~icati~s-uppl~da items, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:00 p.m., September 13, 1976, at
Huntington Beach City Hall ~ · .t.~
-9-
·.
(22) DISTRICT 2
(22) Other business a nd communi cations or supplemental agenda items :
(a) Consideration of items relative to engagement of firm for
preparation of Feasibility Report regarding sewerage service
for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area:
ITEMS ON
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
m i~ .................. (1)
l ETTER .............•
A/C .... TKLR •.•.
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter
dated Augus.t 25, 1976, from the State Water Resources
Control Board approving the plan of study re Sleepy
Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area. See page "C"
FILE ....•.•.....•.•.•• (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection
Committee certification re final negotiated fee with
Engineering-Science, Inc. for said services. See
page "D"
LETTER ·······-·····
A/C •... TK LR •••• ~.:: .. ~~
···-····················· (3) f:~E~.f~-~r Vote or Cast C / Unanimous Ballot
LETTER ....•.••.•••••
Consideration of Resolution No .. 76-164-2, approving award
of contract to Engineering-Science, Inc. for preparation
of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for Sleepy
Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area, in form approved by
the General Counsel, for a maximum fee not to exceed A/C .... TKL R ••••
P.0-.~1 / . ·······,-··-··-:_···~ ~ ..... ~-<.. ......... .
$ 33, 000. 00. See page "E"
(23) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn &·;;>3
(24) DISTRICT 5
Further consid eration r elative to propo sed s ewerage service for the ~··~······ down-coast a r ea:
LETTER •••••••••.••••
~ ~~l:. ::;<\::)
"lE ----~
LETTER •••..••...•••• ®
A/C .... TKLR ..••
...........................
Consideration of motion to receive and file r equest from The
Irvine Company for annexation of approximately 3,430 acres of
coastal territory between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to
the District. See page "MM"
Report of General Counsel re p r oposed agreement with The Irvine
Company relative to conditions for annexa tion of the down-coast
area to the District
................................. (c) Discussion re conditions of annexation
(d)
r Cast
Unanimou s ~!lot
,, ~ 0/.a1"1) (e)
Roll Cafl Vote r~
Unan imo us Ballot
,FILE ···············-
LETTER ···········-
A/C ..•. TKLR ·-·
..........................
.................... ____ _
Consideration of Resolution No. e stablishing coriditions
and approving agreement with The Irvine Company relative to
annexation of the down-coast area to the District, in form approved
by the General Counsel
Consideration of Resolution No. a uthorizing initiation of
proceedings t"o annex a pproximately 3,430 acres of coastal territory
between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach to the District (Proposed
Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 5), a nd incorporating conditions therefor
-10-
(25)
LllfeR ·····---
DISTRICT 5 Othe~____!urS:lnes-s~~--supplernental agenda items, if any
A/C .... TKLR -{26)
........................ ____ .,
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn,~ ::l I 15 ·. ~....;. t-.l \~ c 1-1
-·-····-····-··---··
(27) DISTRICT 7
FILE ···-··-······-
LmER ····-·····-
A/C ·-·TKLR ....
(28)
(29)
Further consideration of proposed Annexation No. 51 -Orange Park
Acres Annexation:
(a) Report of General Counsel. See page "NN"
~~; Discussion and consideration of further actions re formation
of Improvement District and proposed Annexation No. 51 -
Orange Park Acres Annexation, as deemed appropriate
DISTRICT 7
OtheuusinesS'ancLcornffiunieations c;?supplernental agenda i terns, if any
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn q.·. It
-11-
DISTRICT NO. 1
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Directors present:
Director~ &bsent:
DISTRICT NO. S
o1recto-rspresent:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Directors present:
Directors absent:
DISTRICT NO. 8
Directors present:
Directors absent:
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
July 13, 1977 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
ROLL CALL
James Sharp (Chairman), Philip L. Anthony,
Vernon Evans and Kerm Rima
None
Henry Wedaa (Chairman), Don Smith, Thomas
Riley, John Garthe, Donald Fox, Donald Holt,
Jr., Bob Perry, Earl Roget, Donald Roth,
George Scott, Donald Winn and Frances Wood
None
Bernie Svalstad (Chairman), Donald Hudson,
Russell Gray, Sam Cooper, Norman Culver,
John Garthe, Henry Frese, Don Griffin, Frank
Ma1·shott, Richard Olson, Donald Roth,
Laurence Schmit, Charles Stevens, Jr., Charles
Sylvia, Harriett Wieder and Duane Winters
None
DoTl Mcinnis, (Chairman), Thomas Riley and
Milan Dostal
None
Kerm Rima (Chairman), Paul Ryckoff and
Philip L. Anthony
None
Pete Barrett (Chairman), Bill Vardoulis,
Thomas Riley, Vernon Evans, Francis Glockner,
Don Saltarelli and Don Smith
None
Thomas ~iley (Chairman), Harold ~dwards and
Jon Brand
None
7/13/77
DISTRICT NO. 11
Directors present:
Directors absent:
STAFF ME~IBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Ron Pattinson (Chairman), Norman Gibbs and
Laurence Schmit
None
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William
Clarke, Rita Brown, Janet Conatser and
Hilary Eitzen
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad
Hohener, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Gail Lynch,
Carroll Stone, Bill Knopf, Dan .Suarez and
Vicky Suarez
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors. of County Santitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m.
Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11.
* * * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICTS 7 & 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Receive and file Excerpts
re Board Appointment That the minute excerpts from the following
agencies regarding elections of mayors and
appointment of alternates, be received and ordered filed; and that the follow-
ing representatives be seated as members of the Boards:
Entity District(s)
Irvine
Laguna Beach
South Coast County
Water District
ALL DISTRICTS
Annual election of
Joint Chairman
7
8
8
Active
Bill Vardoulis
Jon Brand
Harold Edwards
Alternate
Mary Ann Gaido
None
Harry Lawrence
This being the annual meeting fixed by the
Boards for election of the Chairman of the
Joint Administrative Organization, the
Secretary'rcported that Directors Donald
Fox, Donald Saltarelli and Donald Winn had been nominated at the regular
meeting of the Joint Boards on June 8, 1977, in accordance with established
procedures.
After a review of election procedures by the General Counsel, a canvass-
ing committee comprised of Directors Mcinnis and Wood and General Counsel
Woodruff was appointed by the Joint Chairman.
Following responses by the candidates to several questions posed by Directors,
the vote was taken by written ballot within the individual Districts and
polled by the canvassing committee. After several ballots in certain
Districts the committee reported that Director Donald Saltarelli had been
elected Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
-2-
7 /13/77
ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by the
Annual Election of Vice Boards for election of the Vice Joint
Joint ·Chairman Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organi-
zation, the Secretary declared the nominations
in order for the office of Vice Joint Chairman.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Fox be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Vice Joint Chairman. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and a unanimous ballot was cast for Director Fox as
Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of Joint
Chairman
Joint Chairman Saltarelli expressed the
appreciation of the Joint Boards to out-
going Joint Chairman Winn for his outstand-
ing service· during the past three terms,
and directed the staff to
Chairman Winn.
prepare an appropriate conunendation for past
Chairman Saltarelli then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
July 27th at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Anthony and Barrett to attend
and participate in the discussions.
The Joint Chairman announced the Annual Work Conference of the California
Association of Sanitation Agencies would be held in Monterey, August 17 -20.
Any Directors interested in attending should contact the staff for further
arrangements.
ALL DISTRICTS
~ppointment of Budget
Committee
on July 19th. Committee members
Dick Olson and Paul Ryckoff.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
General Manager
The Joint Chairman reported that pursuant
to the budget deliberations at the regular
June meeting, a Budget Committee had been
formed and would hold their first meeting
are James Sharp, Chairman, Donald Holt,
Following a brief announcement of several
agenda listing changes, the General Manager
reported that preliminary assessed valua-
tions for the seven Districts had increased
approximately 19% for the 1977-78 fiscal year. Recommended budgets and tax
rates of the individual Districts would be' considered by the respective
Districts at the regular August meeting.
Mr. Harper reported that he had appeared on behalf of the Association of
Metropolitan SeKerage Agencies (AMSA) before Senator Muskie's Public Works
Committee in Washington to present several alternatives to a single defini-
tion of secondary treatment in connection with congressional hearings rela-
tive to proposed changes to PL 92-500. The General Manager was optimistic
that the definition of "marine secondary treatment" which was worked out by
the major West Coast dischargers and supported by the State Water Resources
Control Board would receive favorable consideration by the Committee.
He also reported that the ad valorem tax issue for funding maintenance and
operation costs was still alive.
-3-
7/13/77
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reviewed the unique
Authorizing execution of position of the Districts with regard to
Enforcement Compliance the National Pollutant Discharge Elimina-~·
Schedule Letter (ECSL) tion System (NPDES) through which municipal
re NPDES Permit sewage agencies are issued permits for dis-
charge of wastewater pursuant to PL 92-500.
The Environmental Protection Agency has delegated authority to the State
to issue NPDES permits in California. However, because the Districts'
ocean outfall extends beyond the three-mile limit, EPA has decided that
they will also issue a permit. Orange County Sanitation Districts are
the only agency in California that is required to obtain permits from
both regulatory bodies. The Regional Water Quality Control Board has
issued a permit setting forth requirements and compliance dates and EPA is
requesting the Districts execute an Enforcement Compliance Schedule
Letter (ECSL).
There were objectional prov1s1ons in the proposed ECSL and in discussions
with the EPA, we have been successful in having the ECSL language revised
to assure that enforcement would be within the intent of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act and, further, that compliance would be contingent
upon receipt of construction grants. The General Manager and General
Counsel recoIIll~ended that the Boards authorize execution of the ECSL which
would allow for discharge of up to 227 MGD during the next five years
subject to certain conditions established by the Districts which were
described by the General Counsel.
Following a general discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards adopt Resolution No. 77-99, authorizing the General Manager
to sign the Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letter (ECSL) pertaining to the
issuance of the NPDES Permit, subject to certain conditions specified by
the Boards of Directors, as set forth in said resolution.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of General
Counsel
The General Counsel briefly reviewed his
litigation status report which had been
provided to Directors with the agenda
material. Following comments regarding the
difficulties that had been encountered with Hartford Insurance Company,
underwriter for several of the Districts' contractors, Mr. Woodruff reported
that the problems had apparently been resolved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratif~cation of payment of
Joint Operating and Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund claims
Fund
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Districts' claims on
the following dates be, and is hereby~
ratified in the total amounts so indicated:
June 14, 1977
$ 79,288.84
54 7' 512. 36
$626,801.20
June 21, 1977
$ 80,476.47
474,236.39
$554' 712. 86
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-4", and
"C-1" through "C-4", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Director Dostal requested that his abstention from voting on Warrant No.
37816 be made a matter of record.
-4-
7/13/77
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claims on the
"~ following dates be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund June 14, 1977 June 21, 1977
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $93,175.50 $352.00
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-1", and "D-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claims on the
following dates be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund
Operating Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
June 14, 19 77
$ 50.00
207,749.01
$207,799.01
June 21, 1977
$ 50.00
2,535.63
$2,585.63
in accordance with said claims listed on Page "B-1" and Page "D-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claims on the
following dates be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund June 14, 1977 June 21, 1977
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $1,292.56 $6,054.70
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-2" and "D-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT S Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claims on the
following dates be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund June 14, 1977 June 21, 1977
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $3,294.39 $191,974.52
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-2" and "D-1", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-5-
7 /13/77
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claim on the
following date be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amount so indicated:
Fund June 14, 1977
Suspense Fund $150.00
in accordance with said claim listed on Page "B-3", attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claims on the
following dates be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund June 14, 1977
Operating Fund $1,709.74
Facilities Revolving Fund
$1,709.74
June 21, 1977
$194.14
200.00
$394.14
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-3" and "D-2", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Ratification of
payment of claims That payment of District claims on the
following dates be, and is hereby ratified
in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund
Operating Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
June 14, 1977
$9,SOO.OO
$9,500.00
June 21, 19 77
$142.66
7.49
$150.15
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B-3 and "D-2", attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding purchase of
Specification No. A-083 TI1at the bid tabulation and recommendation
for purchase of one (1) 4-Wheel Drive "Jeep
Universal", Specification No. A-083, be received and ordered filed and
that award of said purchase to Brian Chuchuas Jeep, Inc., in the amount of
$4,419.95, be approved.
-6-
7/13/77
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Stop
Notice re Job No. PW-050 That the Stop Notice submitted by C.G.I.
(Conte-Glancz Industries) in the amount of
$4,139.50 against Skipper & Company, contractor for Installation of Foul
Air Treatment at Plant No. 2 Headworks "C", Job No. PW-050, be received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Superintendent's
visits to Denver & Detroit
re P2-23 operational evalua-
tion
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager's action sending
the Superintendent to Denver, Colorado on
June 28-30, 1977, for operational evaluation
in conjunction with completion of plans and
specifications for 75 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-23, be and is hereby ratified and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Superintendent be authorized to travel to Detroit
re said evaluation and that reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and
incidental expenses incurred in connection said trips be authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing Chief of Industrial
Waste Division to attend Ninth
Mid-Atlantic Industrial Waste
Conference
1977; and,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Chief of Industrial Waste Division
be authorized to attend the Ninth Mid-
Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference in
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, on August 8 & 9,
FURTiiER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses incurred in connection therewith be approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing Joint Chairman
to attend AMSA Conference in
-:Hartford, Connecticut
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Joint Chairman be authorized to
attend the Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies' Conference on Energy
Conservation and Waste Management in Hartford, Connecticut, August 16-19,
1977; and authorizing reimbursement for tr?-vel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses incurred therewith.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter
from OCEA re employees'
handbook
be received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter from the Orange County
Employees Association, dated June 1, 1977,
relative to employees' information handbook
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to plans and specification re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Job No. J-7-3A-2 specifications for Plumbing for Administra-
tion and Engineering Building Remodel, Job
~· No. J-7-3A-2, authorizing an addition of $335.24 to the contract with Pacific
Plumbing Company of Santa Ana for substitution of plumbing fixtures, be
approved. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
-7-
7/13/77
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 3
to plans and specification re
Job No. I-4-lR
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for Replacement of Gas
Storage Facilities at Treatment Plants Nos.
1 and 2, Job No. I-4-lR, granting a time extension of 47 calendar days to
the contract· with Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company due to unsuitable
weather for welding, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. I-4-lR
as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 77-87, accepting Replacement of Gas
Storage Facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. I-4-lR, as
complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Orders to
plans and specifications re
Job No. Pl-16
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the following change orders to the
plans and specifications for 46 MGD
Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation
Plant No. 1,
with Donovan
Job No. Pl-16, authorizing the changes indicated to the contract
Construction Company of Minnesota, be approved.
Change Order No. 17 -Addition of $5,032.25 for construction modifications
and time extension of 12 calendar days for completion
of said work.
Change Order No. 18 -Addition of $19,100.00 to provide paving and drainage
for storage area.
Change Order No. 19 -Addition of $3,705.45 for substitution of pipe, replace-
ment of paving and installation of flexible couplings
and time extension of 10 calendar days for completion
of said work.
Change Order No. 20 -Addition of $10,279.97 for miscellaneous parts needed
and time extension of 42 calendar days for installation
of said parts.
Copies of these change orders are attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Change Order No. 2
to plans and specifications
re Job No. P2-23-l
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Flood Wall and Site
Development for 75 MGD Improved Treatment
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-l, authorizing a deduction of $8,010.00 from
the contract with Pascal. & Ludwig, Inc., for deletion of 1800 feet of
communication cable, be approved. Copy of this change order is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-8-
7/13/77
ALL DISTRICTS Following a brief report it was moved,
seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Manager
to award contract for print~
ing plans re Job No. P2-23-6 That the General Manager be authorized to
receive bids and award a contract for
printing of plans for Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, to the lowest responsible bidder in an
amount not to exceed $22,500.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing Phase II of
Engineering Building Remodel
remodeling project, it was
Following a report by Director Culver,
Chairman of the Building Committee,
regarding complet-ion of Phase I of the
administration and engineering building
moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to proceed with remodeling of the downstairs
portion of the engineering section, Phase II of the Administration and
Engineering Building Remodeling, in an amount not to exceed $25,000, as
recommended by the Building Conunittee.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving plans and
specifications re
Job No. P2-23-6
Following a brief staff report re a change
of the proposed bid date for Job No. P2-23-6,
it w·as moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 77-88, approving plans and specifications for Major Facilities for 75 MGD
Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, and authorizing adver-
tising for bids to be received on October 11, 1977. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing execution of
agreement with Bird Machine
Company for purchase of
centrifuge
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 77-98, authorizing execution
of agreement with Bird Machine Company
for purchase of one centrifuge for sludge
dewatering facilities, in the amount of $210,975.00 plus tax, FOB shipping
point, in form approved by the General Counsel. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 1
Receive, file and deny
request of National
Technology for waiver
of late penalty charges
re Districts' Connection
and Use Ordinance
ordered filed and denied.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the request of National Technology,
dated June 1, 1977, for waiver of penalty
charges in the amount of $80.70 relative
to late payment for 1977-78 second quarter
use charge pursuant to the Districts'
Connection and Use Ordinance, be received,
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m., July· 13, 1977.
-9-
7 /13/77
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation
No. 15 That the Board of Directors adopt Standard
Resolution No. 77-89-2, ordering annexation
of 26.382 acres to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa Drive and
Loma Street (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to County Sanitation
District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part 9f these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Authorizing initiation
of proceedings re Proposed
Annexation No. 23
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Standard
Resolution No. 77-90-2, authorizing initia-
tion of proceedings to annex 1.838 acres
of territory to the District in the Anaheim Hills area (Proposed Annexation
No. 23 -Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 6 to County Sanitation District No. 2).
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Referring request from
J. L. Argo for annexation
of territory to staff re
Proposed Annexation No. 25
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the request form J. L. Argo, dated
June 21, 1977, requesting annexation of
.456 acres of territory to the District
in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and
Country Hills Road, be received, ordered filed and referred to staff for
study and recommendation (Proposed Annexation No. 25 -Argo Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this Resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order
No. 3 to plans and
specifications re Contract
No. 2-14-3
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor and South Santa Ana River Intercep-
tor Connector, Contract No. 2-14-3, authoriz-
ing a change in pipe size at no cost to the District to the contract with
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., be approved. Copy of this change order is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order No. 6
to plans and spctifica.tions
re Contract No. 2-14-3
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and
specifications for Santa Ana River Inter-
ceptor and South Santa Ana River Intercep-
tor Connector, Contract No. 2-14-3, authoriz-
ing an addition of $21,488.91 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons,
Inc. for removal of undisclosed cement treated base, and granting a time
extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said work, be approved.
Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-10-
7 /13/77
DISTRICT 2
Approving Change Order No. 1
to plans and specifications
re Contract No. 2-15-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Yorba Linda Pump
Station Diversion Manhole, Contract No.
2-15-1, authorizing an addition of $1,905.98 to the contract with Bejac
Corporation due to alignment change, be approved. Certified copy of this
change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Contract No.
2-15-1 as complete That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 77-91-2, accepting Yorba Linda Pwnp
Station Diversion Manhole, Contract No. 2-15-1, as complete; authorizing
execution of Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m., July 13, 1977.
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint re Contract No.
3-20-2 and refer to General
CoW1sel
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Sununons and Complaint for Money,
Common Counts, Foreclosure on Labor and
Material Bond and on Stop Notice re Case
No. 27-04-82, All American Asphalt vs.
A. G. Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Contractor, Inc., et al., relative
to the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2; be
received, ordered filed and referred to the Districts' General Counsel
for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Breach of
Contract re Contract No.
3-20-2 and refer to General
Counsel
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Summons and Complaint for Breach of
Contract re Case No. 27-12-69, A. G. Tutor
Co., Inc.~ a corporation, and N. M. Saliba,
an individual, doing business as N. M. Saliba
Company, a Joint Venture, vs. County Sanita-
tion District No. 3 of Orange CoW1ty, a Public Corporation, relative to the
Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2; be received,
ordered filed and referred to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate
action.
DISTRICT 3
Status reports re
Knott Interceptor
and the Orangethorpe Relief
The staff advised that a report would be
submitted at the next regular meeting
relative to the construction of the re-
maining reaches of the Knott Interceptor
Trunk.
-11-
7 /13/77
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared ~
the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 13, 1977.
DISTRICT 5
Amending resolution
approving plans and
specifications re
Contract No. 5-20
(Revised)
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 77-92-5, amending Resolution No. 77-77-5,
approving revised plans and specifications
for Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-20
(Revised), providing for establishment of
the bid date upon approval of the project by the California Coastal Zone
Conservation Commission, and authorizing deferral of said bid date if such
approval is not forthcoming. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5
Approving Change Order
No. 4 to plans and
specifications re
Contract No. 5-20A
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 4 to plans and specifi-
cations for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (Material
Purchase only), Contract No. 5-20A, authoriz-
ing an adjustment of engineer's quantities
for a total addition of $4,266.15 to the contract with United States Pipe
and Foundry Company, be approved. A.copy of this change order is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5
Accepting delivery of
pipe re Contract No.
5-20A as complete
as complete.
DISTRICT 5
Receive, file and deny
claim of David E. Griswold
re Bayside Drive Trunk
Sewer and refer to
liability insurance
carrier
for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 5
Referring request from
The Irvine Company for
annexation of territory
to staff re Proposed
Annexation No. 8
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That delivery of pipe in accordance with
Contract.No. 5-20A, Back Bay Trunk Sewer
(Material Purchase Only), be accepted
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the claim submitted by David E. Griswold,
dated June 7, 1977, for damages in the
amount of $745.10, in connection with
the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer be received,
ordered filed and denied and referred to
the Districts' liability insurance carrier
Following a brief report it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That the request from The Irvine Company
for annexation of 1.095 acres of territory
to the District in the Harbor View Hills
area be received, filed and referred to
staff (Proposed Annexation No. 8 -Harbor Ridge Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 5)
-12-
7/13/77
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 13, 1977.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 13, 1977.
DISTRICT 7
Election of
Chairman
The Joint Chairman announced that the Chair-
manship of County Sanitation District No. 7
had been vacated by virtue of the recent
retirement of Director Burton from the
Boards of Directors, and it would therefore be in order for the Board to
consider election of a new Chairman.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Pete Barrett be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrett as Chairman.
It was further moved and seconded: That Director Bill Vardoulis be nominated
as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tern to fill the vacancy left
by election of Chairman Barrett. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Bill Vardoul is
as Chairman pro tern.
DISTRICT 7
Ordering annexation of
territory to the District
(Proposed Annexation No. 62)
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt Standard
Resolution No. 77-93-7, ordering annexation
of 4.05 acres to the District in the vicinity
of Chapman Avenue and Santiago Boulevard (Proposed Annexation No. 62 -Tract
8663 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified copy of this resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Director Smith requested that his abstentfon from voting on the item be
made a matter of record, and explained his reasons therefor.
DISTRICT 7
Referring request from
William Frantz for annexa-
tion of territory to staff
re Proposed Annexation No. 68
received, ordered filed,
(Proposed Annexation No.
No. 7) .
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the request from William E. and Chloe
B. Frantz for annexation of 4.001 acres
of territory.to the District in the vicinity
of Morado Drive and Santiago Canyon Road be
and referred to staff for study and recommendation
68 -Frantz Annexation to County Sanitation District
-13-
7/13/77
DISTRICT 7
Approving Addendum No. l
to plans and specifications
re Contract No. 7-2-Rl
changing the bid date from June
copy of the addendum is on file
DISTRICT 7
Hearing re proposed
Annexation No. 60
Chairman declared said hearing
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifi-'-11
cations for Red Hill Relief Trunk Sewer
Manhole Cover Replacement, Contract No. 7-2-Rl
30, 1977, to July 26, 1977, be approved. A
in the office of the Secretary of the District.
This being the time and place previously
set for the hearing on proposed Annexation
No. 60 -Tract Nos. 8964 and 8809 to
County Sanitation District No. 7, the
open at 9:13 p.m.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the summary of the Local Agency Formation Conunission and District No.
7's action re proposed Annexation No. 60 -Tract Nos. 8964 and 8809 to
County Sanitation .District No. 7 be received and ordered filed.
The Secretary advised that no written protests had been received.
The Chair then called for oral protests and, hearing none, tleclared the
hearing closed at 9:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation of
territory to the District
(Proposed Annexation No. 60)
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. 77-94-7, ordering annexation of 30.359
acres to the District in the vicinity south
of Santiago Canyon Road in the City of Orange (Proposed Annexation No. 60 -
Tract Nos. 8964 and 8809 to County Sanitation District No. 7). Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Approving the revised
Director Smith distributed a memorandum
relative to the proposed revised agreements
for collection of sewer connection charges
and requested that the comments contained
therein be made a matter of record as
agreements for collection
of sewer connection charges
follows:
"Regarding today's agenda item on the transfer of funds collected
within Sanitation District No. 7 by Costa Mesa Sanitary District
and the cities of Santa Ana and Tustin, I am not opposed to this
agenda item, but I am concerned with establishing a precedent that
could have an affect on the City of Orange.
It is my w1derstanding that Orange is the only city that has
utilized their own funds to construct sewer lines.outside of their
city limits which were built to the District's master plan and were
constructed with the intent-of ultimately selling these lines to
the District.
Establishing the precedent of transferring the funds collected
by the above-mentioned cities to the District would possibly be a
detriment to Orange, should the request be made of our city.
-14-
7 /13/77
Our position would be that prior to transferring any funds, an
amount equal to those monies owed the City for the sewer lines they
constructed be deducted and retained on deposit with the City until
such time as the City elects to relinquish the ownership of said
sewer lines. At that time, the funds would be transferred to the
City and ownership of the sewer lines would be transferred to the
District."
The following actions were then taken:
DISTRICT 7
~proving new ag_rcement
with CMSD re collection of
sewer connection charg_e_s __
and rescinding agreement re
Ordinance No. 705 -
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 77-95-7, approving
agreement with Costa Mesa Sanitary
District for collection of sewer
connection charges, and rescinding
Agreement Implementing County Sanitation District No. 7, Ordinance No.
705. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Approving new agreement
with City of Santa Ana
for collection of sewer
connection charges and
rescinding agreement re
Ordinance No. 705
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 77-96-7, approving
agreement with the City of Santa
Ana for collection of sewer connection
charges, and rescinding Agreement
Implementing County Sanitation
District No. 7, Ordinance No. 705. Certified copy of this resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Approving new agreement
with the City of Tustin
for collection of sewer
connection charges ~nd
rescinding agreement re
Ordinance No. 705
:Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 77-97-7, approving
agreement with the City of Tustin
for collection of sewer connection
charges, and rescinding Agreement
Implementing County Sanitation
District No. 7, Ordinance No. 705. Certified copy of this resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m., July 13, 1977.
-15-
7/13/77
DISTRICT 11
Rccei ve, fi 1 e and approve.
Final EIR re Master Plan
of Sewer Facilities
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Final Environmental Impact Report
re Master Plan of Sewer Facilities fo~
Cow1ty Sanitation District No. 11, be
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said Final EIR has been completed in compliance with
the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and that the information contained in said
EIR has been reviewed and considered by the Board prior to consideration
of approval of the Master Plan Projects.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Tentatively approving Master
Plan of Sewer Facilities That the Master Plan of Sewer Facilities
for County Sanitation District No. 11,
be tentatively approved, subject to approval of trunk sewer alignments within
the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission ·
and State Department of Fish and Game and Parks and Recreation.
DISTRICT 11
First reading of proposed
Ordinance No. 1104 re
establishing sewer connec-
tion charges
sewage facilities be read by
It was moved, seconded and unanimously
carried:
That Ordinance No. 1104, an ordinance amend-
ing Ordinance No. 1103, establishing sewer
connection charges for use of District
title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is, hereby
waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1104 by title only, it was then
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Or<linance No. 1104, an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 1103, establishing
sewer connection charges for use of District sewage facilities be introduced
and passed to the second reading on August 10, 1977, at 7:30 p.m., in the
District's administrative offices.
DISTRICT 11
Approving standard agreement
for collection of sewer con-
nection charges by City of
Huntington Beach and authoriz-
ing staff to s1~bmi t to City -
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Standard Agreement for Collection
of Sewer Connection Charges by City of
Huntington Beach on behalf of the District,.
be approved in principle; and,
FURTHER ~DVED: That the staff be authorized to submit said agreement to
the City for consideration by the City Council.
-16-
7/13/77
DISTRICT 11
Report of status re
revised agreement with
Sunset Beach Sanitary
District and the City
of Huntington Beach
The General Counsel briefly reviewed his
written report relative to the proposed
revised agreement between the District,
City of Huntington Beach, and the Sunset
Beach Sanitary District for accepting
discharge of the Sanitary District's
wastewater. Discussions have been held with
the President of the Sanitary District Board, who has verbally concurred
with the proposed agreement. There is, however, concern with regard to the
financial ability of the Sanitary District to pay the cost of providing
sewage service for their increased flows. The General Manager reported he
was developing several alternatives and would report back to the Board in
the near future.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared·
the meeting so adjourned at 9:22 p.m., July 13, 1977.
DISTRICT 8
Election of
Chairman and Chairman
pro tern of the Board
The Secretary declared that nominations
were in order for the annual election of
Chairman of the Board of Directors of
CoW1ty Sanitation District No. 8.
It was then moved and seconded: That Harold E. Edwards be nominated as
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Edwards as Chairman.
It was further moved and seconded: That Director Jon S. Brand be nominated
as candidate for the office of Chairman pro tern. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous
ballot for Director Brand as Chairman pro t~m.
DISTRICT 8
Discussion re dissolu-
tion of District
The staff briefly reviewed the status of
District No. 8 with regard to the responsi-
bility for sewage service in the Laguna/
Moul ton Niguel vicinity. In recent years
the Aliso Wastewater Management Agency (AWMA) has been formed to provide
wastewater treatment and disposal in that area. Since AW~~ will provide
the services that might otherwise be the responsibility of District No. 8
it appears appropriate for the Board to consider the future of the District
and whether or not it should remain in existence or be dissolved.
Following a brief discussion of the matter, it was the consensus of the
Directors that each should review the matter with the Boards of their
respective agencies, following which District No. 8 would convene to further
consider the nppropriatc action.
-17-
7 /13/77
DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
by roll call vote: Approval of 1977-78
Operating Fund Budget
Tirnt the District's 1977-78 fiscal year
budget be and it is hereby approved and adopted in the following total
amount:
DISTRICT 8
Total Amount of 1977--78 Operating Fund Budget $633.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget is hereby received and ordered filed, and;
FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby
authorized and directed to sign and budget.
DISTRICT 8
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 8 be adjourned. the Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m., July 13, 1977.
-18-
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
~806
37807
37808
37809
37810
37811
37812
::57813
37814
37815
: 31816
37817
37818
37819
37820
37821
37822
37823
37824
37825
37826
37827
37828
37829
-7830
~/831
37832
37833
37834
37835
37836
37837
37838
37839
37840
37841
37842
37843
37844
37845
37846
37847
37848
37849
. '37850
37851
37852
37853
37854
7i7855
..._.;7856
37857
37858
37859
A & W Electric Motors, Tools
Admiral Paint Company, Paint
Air California, Air Fare Various Meetings
Alex Fish Company, Laboratory Supplies
Aljac Supply Company, Sand Paper and Emery Cloth
American Cyanamid Company, Polymer
American Society for Testing, ASTM Standard Manual
City of Anaheim, Power
Artesia Implements & Parts Company, Tractor Parts
Associated of Los Angeles, Electric Supplies
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Bassett Office Furniture, Repair Chair
Bearing Specialty Company, Seals
Beckman Instruments, 0 Rings
Bird Machine, Freight
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuild Magtronic
C & R Reconditioning Company, Repair Magtronic
CS Company, Valve Parts
Cal-State Seal Company, Valve Packing
California Auto Collision, Repair Body Damage
California Lithograph Corporation, Printing & Binding
Chemical Marketing Reporter, Buyers Directory
Chevron, USA, Inc., Gasoline, Diesel Fuel
College Lumber Company, Inc., Lumber
Compressor Products, Rebuild Valves
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Copeland Motors, Truck Parts
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Daniel Measurements, JPL-Acts Materials
John M. Deck, Fuel Tank
Deco, Electric Supplies
De Guelle & Sons Glass, JPL-Acts Materials
Diesel Control Corporation, Governor Parts
Homer R. Dulin Company, Calibrate Meter
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
. Hilary Eitzen, Employee Mileage
Enchanter, Inc., Ecological Trawl
Engard Coatings Corporation, Coatings
Fischer & Porter Company, Chlorinator Parts
Flow Systems, Pump Parts
Foremost Threaded Products, Hardware
Clifford A. Forkert, Engineering Services, Oil Lease Survey
GAF Corporation, Repair Blueprint Machine
General Electric Supply, Instrumentation Panel
Georgia Pacific, Plywood
General Telephone
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge & Grit Removal
Graybar Electric Company, Electrical Fittings
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires
Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts
Bundley Company, Timer
Hykil Weed Control, Cut Weeds
"A-1"
$
AMOUNT
67.88
53.06
58.40
63.60
418.55
21,376.04
33.79
193.41
290.53
450.42
41.23
55.85
50.41
41.44
33.34
115. 01
675.00
748.64
32.54
240.80
2,767.66
28.00
3,680.22
187.15
470.80
601. 30
2,742.22
65.30
372. so
57.98
27. 77
991. 74
30.74
4.32
75.00
309.78
32.34
3,000.00
458. 71
1,321.08
665.69
36.84
352.57
55.78
453.45
582.07
77 .40
35.70
8,605.75
17.94
26.99
310.42
136. 71
535.00
.JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID .JUNE 14, 1977
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
37860
37861
37862
37863
37864
37865
37866
37867
37868
37869
37870
37871
37872
37873
37874
37875
37876
37877
37878
37879
37880
37881
37883
37884
37885
37886
37887
37888
37889
37890
37891
37892
37893
37894
37895
37896
37897
37898
37899
37900
37901
37902
37903
37904
37905
37906
37907
37908
37909
37910
37911
37912
37913
37814
International Harvester Company, Truck Parts
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Seals
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Valves
Kelco Sales & Engineering Company,. Nozzles
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Seals, Couplings
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
Knox Industrial Supplies, Tools
LBWS, inc., Regulator Parts, Tools
L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Service
Laursen Color Lab, Photo Processing
Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lamps
Long Beach Safety Council, OSHA Manual
Los Angeles Times, Employment Advertisement
Mc Coy Ford Tractor, Equipment Parts
George Miller Construction, Raise Manholes
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Lumber Supply, Hardware
National Sanitary Supply, Janitorial Supplies
City of Newport Beach, Water
Orange County Farm Supply Company, Insecticide
Orange County Flag & Banner, Flags
Oxygen Service, Lab Gases
Pacific Telephone Company
Parts Unlimited,, Auto Parts
M. C. Patten Corporation, Gauge
Perkin-Elmer, Lab Analysis
Photo & Sound Company, Workshop
B. Dalton Pickwick Book Store, Handbooks
Postmaster, Postage
llarold Primrose Ice, Sampling Supplies
Printec Corporation, Specification Supplies
The Register, Employment Advertisement
Safety Service & Supply, JPL-Acts Materials
Santa Ana Blueprint, Blueprints
Sargent Welch Scientific, Laboratory Supplies
City of Seal Beach, Water
Seal Methods, Inc., Packing
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools
See Optics, Safety Glasses
S. F. Serrantino, Et1ployee Mileage
Service Motor Parts, Repair Engine
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee ~lileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Smith Brothers, Closure Plates
Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service
Southern California Edison
So Cal Sign Company, Signs
South Orange Supply, PVC Pipe Fittings
Southern California Gas
Southern California Water Company, Water
Speedc Speedometer, Gauges
Starow Steel, Steel
"A-2" -
$
AMOUNT
228.43 ~
1.90
44.42
375.24
187.81
96.58
104.94
212.65
166.58
1,125.51
39.49
229.47
73.20
38.52
73.37
1,700.00
1,410.39
193.89
127.20
5.36
353.20
110. 69
115. 43
55.12
20. 71
43. 91 ''-""
213.25
25.00
308.82
500.00
15.90
497.77
41.34
235 .11
34.87
348 .40
8.23
125.12
93.12
31.80
52.14
1,188.41
649.48
52.74
68. 50 .
68.90
395.00
7,254.90
53.00
28.29
962 .69 ~·
7.03
49.31
403.19
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
~915
37916
37917
37918
37919
37920
37921
-37922
'37923
37924
·37925
'37926
37927
37928
37929
37930
37931
37932
The Suppliers, Tools
C. O. Thompson Petroleum, Kerosene
Thorpe Insulation, JPL-Acts Materials
Trexler Compressor, Valve Parts
Truck and Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
J. G. Tucker & Son, Oxygen Cell Repair
US Plastic, JPL-Acts Materials
United Parcel, .Delivery
United States Equipment, Gaskets
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Valley Cities Supply Company, Pipe Fittings
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Wallace & Tiernan, Flow Meter
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
"A-3"
$
AMOUNT
758.13
81.92
41.18
159.42
194.97
96.38
334.65
27.20
209.64
88.90
397.50
738.49
552.04
54.06
157. 71
15.30
6.75
371.42
$ 79,288,84
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
37792
37793
37794
37795
37796
37797
37798
37799
37800
37801
37802
37803
37804
37805
Campbell llcating & Air Conditioning, Contractor J-7-3A-1
John Carollo Engineers & Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2-23
Consoer, Townsend and Associates, Value Engineering P2-23
Desert Dynamics, Winch
Designed Facilities Leasing Company, Trailer Rental
Oonovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
Hoagland Engineering, Contract Management Pl-16
McCalla Brothers, Contractor E-080
Pepsi Company Building Systems, JPL Office Rent
Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel, Contractor I-4-lR
Productool, Inc., Platform Truck
Skipper and Company, Contractor J-6-lD
Southern California Testing Labs, Testing Pl-16
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
"A-4"
$
AMOUNT
""' 4,873.50
209,121.36
5,273.84
592.94
80.10
232,496.02
205.63
15,985.50
9,859.60
62.54
20,492.10
149.73
48,282.60
36.90
$ 547,512.36
$ 626,801.20
INDIVIDUAL DISTRIC1S CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977
DISTRICT NO. 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
·33752
33753
. 33754
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 1-14
Bubalo and Artukovich, Contractor 1-14
Smith Emery, Testing 1-14
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
33755 Local Agency Formation, Annexation 18 Processing Fee
33756
33757
33758
33759
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3
Bejac Corporation, Contractor 2-15-1
Engineering-Science, Inc., Feasibility Report Sleepy Hollow
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-3
"B-1"
AMOUNT
$ 1,013.50
92,016.00
146.00
$ 93,175.50
$ 50.00
$174,100.00
17,004.60
15,635.41
1,009.00
$207,749.01
$207,799.01
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 14, 1977
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMU L!UED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
33760
33761
33762
33763
33764
33765
33766
33767
33768
33769
33770
33771
33772
33773
33774
33775
33776
33777
33778
33779
33780
33781
33782
33783
33784
33785
33786
33787
33788
City of Anaheim, Striping 3-20-3
Ameren Pipe Group, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Ampac, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
John Artukovich & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Vido Artukovich & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Associated Concrete, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Bennett Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Christene Corporation, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Montie Carter Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Cote Mark, Inc., Refund Payment Plans &·Specs 3-20-3
R. E. & R. W. Crane, ·efund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Richard E. Hampton Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Hood Corporation, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Hydro Conduit, Refund Payment Plans·& Specs 3-20-3
KEC Company, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Mike Masanovich Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Merco Construction, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Andrew Papic & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Pascal & Ludwig, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Joe Petrovich, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Mike Prlich & Sons, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Steve Rados, Inc., Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Smith Electric Supply, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Sully Miller, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Tutor & Saliba, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
Jim Walter Corporation, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
R. A. Wattson Company, Refund Payment Plans & Specs 3-20-3
DISTRICT NO. S ·
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown and i3earwitz, Legal Services 5-20
Simpson-Steppat, Engineering Services 5-20
"B-2"
'-"'
AMOUNT
$ 942.56
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10. 00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
20.00 ~
10.00
30.00
20.00
40.00
10.00
$ 1,292.56
$ 2,560.39
734.00
$ 3,294.39
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID' JUNE 14,
DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6
~ SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
33789 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19
33790 County of Orange,
DISTRICT NO. 7
·oPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Election Services re Annexation No. 51
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
33791 Ultrasystems, Inc., EIR re Master Plan
"B-3"
1977
AMOUNT
$ . 150.00
$ 1,709.74
$ 9,500.00
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FOND WARRANTS
37964
37965
37966
37967
37968
37969
37970
37971
37972
37973
37974
37975
37976
37977
37978
37979
37980
37981
37982
37983
37984
37985
37986
37987
37988
.37989
37990
37~91
37992
37993
37994
37995
37996
37997
37998
37999
38000
38001
38002
38003
38004
38005
38006
38007
38008
38009
38010
38011
38012
38013
38014
38015
38016
38017
38018
Alaska Constructors, Refund Overpayment Plans & Specs P2-23-2 $
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts
American Cyanamid Company, Polymer
Amonco Tool, Repair Lathe
The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing
V. B. Anderson, Welder Parts
Associated of Los Angeles, Electric Supplies
Barnes & Delaney, Water Screen Parts
Bearing Specialty Company, Oil Seal
Blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt
LD Brinkman/Greenbaum Division, Tile Cutter
CS Company, Bearings
California Alloys Company, JPL-ACTS Repairs
California Association of Sanitary Agencies, Conference Registration
R.B. Clapp Company, Timer
College Lumber, J-7-3 Materials
Conrock Company, Concrete J-7-3
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies
Continental Radiator, Repair Radiator
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Controlco, JPL-ACTS Materials
Cooperative Personnel Service, Personnel Tests
Burt Court/Precision Pump, Pump Parts
Mr. Crane, Crane Rental
Charles P. Crowley, JPL-ACTS Supplies
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Deionized Water
C. R. Davis Supply, Hardware
Deco, Electric Supplies
DeGuelle & Sons Glass, Glass
Dico Company, Equipment Parts
Eco Air Products, Filters
Enviro Development Company, Operations Manual
Envirotech, Skimmer Parts
Filter Supply Company, Filters
Fischer & Porter Ccmpany, Recorder Parts
Fisher Controls Company, Regulator Parts
Foremost Threaded Products, Hardware
Foster Gardner, Chemicals
City of Fullerton, Water
General Telephone Company
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Sludge & Grit Removal
Harrington Industrial, JPL-ACTS Materials
Hasty Lawn & Garden, Repair Mower
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hertz Car Leasing, Leased Vehicles
Hi Flex International, Hose
Honeywell, Inc., Charts
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Alloys, JPL-ACTS Supplies
Huntington l3each Equipment Rental; Equipment Rental
1-C Electronic, Transistors
Kaman Bearing & Supply, Pipe Fittings
Kelco Sales & Engineering, Equipment Parts
King Bearing, Couplings, V Belts, Rings
Kingmann-Whi te, Inc., Instrumentation Supplies
"C-1"
AMOUNT
35.00 ·~
788.87
4 ·, 947. 04
355.35
118 .19
69.28
284. 08
1,552.20
52.69
33.59
79.45
93.44
4,803.40
50.00
56.15
37.31
1,112.42
100 .. 23
111. 92
8,015.72
200.70
85.00
21.55
301. ·oo
1,590.00
40. 00 '-'
330.36
499.47
19.47
241.68
24.42
530.00
486.74
107.36
610.81
94.58
163.62
125.08
38~80
2,953.20
8,829.25
42.15
151. 09
315.00
743.54
18.73
68.58
10. 92
4,020.00
33.92
33.10 """"'
125.35
218.00
235.78
98.26
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977
WARRANT NO.
~19
38020
38021
38022
38023
38024
38025
~8026
38027
.38028
·38029
38030
38031
38032
38033
38034
38035
38036
38037
38038
38039
38040
38041
38042
... "043
_,-044
38045
38046
38047
38-048
38049
38050
38051
38052
38053
38054
38055
38056
38057
38058
38059
3'8060
38061
38062
3'8063
38064
38065
38066
38067
"~068
~069
38070
38071
38072
38073
Knox Industrial Supp lies, Hardware
LA·X-Ray, JPL-ACTS Welding X-Ray Inspection
LBWS, Inc,, Hardware, Tools, Demurrage, Oxygen
L & N Uniforrr Supply, ·Uniform Service
Lighting Distributors, Inc., Lamps
Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints
Mine Safety AppliaHces, Sampling & Safety Supplies
E. B. Moritz Foundry, MH Rings & Covers
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
Orange County Fire Protection, Fire Extinguisher Maintenance
Void
Orange Valve & Fitting, Hardware
Pacific States Electric Wholesale, Light Fixtures
Peterson Company, Repair Buoys
B. Dalton Pickwick, Books
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Porter Boiler Service, Repair Boiler
Harold Primrose Ice, Sampling Supplies
Quality Building Supply, Cement
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
Relief Printing Company, Printing of Business Cards
Reynolds Aluminum Supply, Aluminum
Roseburrough Tool, Tools
Sand Dollar Business ·Forms, Printing
Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies
Scientific Products~ Lab Supplies
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools
Service Tape & Label Company, Specification Supplies
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint
Sims Industrial, Safety Equipment
Smith Electric Motors, Repair Electric Motor
Southern California Edison
So Cal Sign Company, Signs
Southern California Gas Company
Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water
Standard Brands Paint Company, J-7-3 Materials
Star-Lite Barricade, Barricade Rental
The Suppliers, Tools
J, Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash
Tools for Industry, Tools
Trexler Compressor, Inc., Valve Parts
Truck and Auto Supply, Truck Parts
Union Oil Company, Gasoline
Union Oil Gas Division, Line Relocation 2-17-1
U. S. Sports Netting, Repair Trawl Net
United Parcel Service, Delivery
University of Irvine Regents, JPL-ACTS Computer Model
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Valley Cities Supply Company, Hand Cleaner
Valvate Associates, Pipe Fittings
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Flame Arrestor
John R. Waples, Odor Consultant
Western Electronic, Relay
Western Wholesale Company, Bla<lc
"C-2"
AMOUNT
$ 379.29
216.02
442.82
87.75
33.83
4.96
253.34
184.33
164.87
482.12
68.90
765.60
2,112.93
44.15
72.82
108.12
15.90
381. 20
133.70
44.52
508.67
45.85
127.20
195.89
78.18
67.26
159.16
342.06
135,41
113. 62
6,804.93
116. 60
1,172.39
111. 31
1'17 .15
60.00
721. 97
406,59
82.07
428.69
921. 76
57.43
4,049.70
82.50
46.20
2.00
200.47
278.49
54.51
95.18
268.37
212.80
28.1. 96
10.98
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977
WARRANT NO.
38074
38075
38076
38077
38078
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Materials
Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services
Xerox Computer Services, EDP Services
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Services
Everett H. York, Valve
"C-3"
$
$
AMOUNT
1,667.87 ~
2,475.00
3,947.59
,1,849.10
18.55
80,,476.47
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977
WARRANT NO. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
.,,951
37952
37953
37954
37955
37956
37957
~37958
37959
37960
~37961
37962
37963
_....,,
Aronson Machine Company, Gear Positioncr E-085
Calgon Corporation, Activated Carbon
John Carollo Engineers, 0 & M Manual Pl-16
John Carollo Engineers & Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2~23
Daily Construction Service, Legal Advertisement P2-23-2
Desert Dynamics~ T-200 Winch
Dodge Construction News, Legal Advertisement P2-23-2
Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16
NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL-ACTS Services
Orange County Restaurant Service, Carpeting P-025
C.E. Raymond/Bartlett-Snow, Calciner Parts
The Register, Legal Advertisement P2-23-2
The Suppliers, Diaphragm Pump
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
"C-4"
$
$
$
AMOUNT
16,762.00
4 ,641. 74
1,898.86
185,406.05
485.05
15.00
344.25
231,064.64
12,099.64
12,907.60
7,390.02
595.08
626.46
474,236.39
554,712.86
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977
DISTRICT NO. 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
37941 Smith Emery, Testing 1-14 $ 352.00
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
37942 Local Agency Formation Conunission, Annexation 22 Processing Fee $ 50.00
ACCUMUALTED CAPITAL OlITLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
37943 Ecos Management Criteria, EIR Carbon Canyon $ 2,300.63
37944 Clifford Forkert, Survey 2-15-1 235.00
$ 2,535.63
~·
$ 2,585.63
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
37945 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-21-2 $ 6,054.70
DISTRICT NO. S
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
37946 United States Pipe & Foundry, Pipe S-20A $ 191,974.52
''D-1"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JUNE 21, 1977
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
37947 The Register, Legal Advertisment Annexation 60 $ 194.14
• FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS .
IN FAVOR OF -
37948 Alex Dreger & Gage Tllo, Refund Permit Overpa)'lnent $ 200.00
$ 394.14
DISTRICT NO. 11
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
37949 Clifford Forkert, Survey Slater Station $ 142.66
~
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
37950 Daily Pilot, Legal Advertisement EIR Public Hearing $ 7.49
$ 150.15
"D-2"
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
SEPTEMBER BJ 1976 -7:30 P.M.
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
~'ARRANT NO. ...,._,
30626
30627
30628
30629
30630
30631
30632
30633
30634
30635
.. 30636
30637
30638
"30639
30640
30641
30642
30643
30644
30645
30646
30647
30648
-1649
~650
30651
30652
30653
30654
30655
30656
30657
30658
30659
30660
03661
30662
30663
30664
~0665
30666
30667
30668
30669
30670
30671
30672
30673
1674
~0675
30676
30677
Air California, Air Fare Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Couplings
American Controls, Valves
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
City of Anaheim, Power
Artesia Implements & Parts, Tractor Blades
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Barksdale Controls Division, Controls
Barnes & Delaney, Water Screen Parts, Gear Parts
Beckman Instruments, Instrumentation
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts
Thomas G. Brisco, Employee Mileage
Bristol Park Medical Group, Employee Pre-employment Exams
C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair
CS Company, Valve Plug
Cals Cameras, Photo Processing
· Castle Company, Lab Equipment
Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil 1lemoval
Clark Dye Hardware, Tools
College Lumber Company, Building Materials
Concrete Transport Equipment, Truck Rental
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies
Consolidated Electric Company, Controls
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Lee L. Cory, Employee Mileage
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
De Guelle & Sons Glass Company, Glass Replacement
Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill
Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies
Wilber Eads, Employee Mileage
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enterprise Printing Company, Office Supplies
Fischer & Porter Company, Instrumentation
Clifford A Forkert, Coast Highway and Oil Lease Mapping
City of Fullerton, Water
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
Groth Chevrolet Company, Truck Parts
L. C. Gysin, Employee Mileage
Harrisons & Crosfield, Chemicals
Hasty Lawn & Garden, Mower Carburetor
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Air Compressor
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires
House of Batteries, Batteries
Howard Supply Company, Regulator Parts & Fittings
City of Huntington Beach, Water
"A-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
58.50
238.72
140.28
11,324.08
155.63
133.56
332.66
568.87
1,986.89
142.25
117 .62
32.34
39.00
480.00
103.60
8.90
249.62
312.84
80.03
220.40
231.25
237.17
729. 97
4,645.65
9.00
598.48
38.83
17.10
235.32
56.56
85.00
31.80
9.60
308.32
21.04
118. 01
1,045.10
6.13
3,398.71
33.54
783.00
281.07
22.20
2,681.80
20.56
265.00
1,253.82
743.51
518.70
674.21
701.16
22.74
"A-1"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
30678
30679
30680
30681
30682
30683
30684
30685
30686
30687
30688
30689
30690
30691
30692
·30693
30694
30695
30697
30698
30699
30700
30701
30702
30703
30704
30705
30706
30707
30708
30709
30710
30711
30712
30713
30714
30715
30716
30717
30718
30719
30720
30721
30722
30723
30724
30725
30726
30727
30728
30729
30730
30731
30732
Huntington Labs, Lab Supplies
International Business Machines, Office Supplies, Mtce Agreement
International Harvester Company, Valve
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Mike Jones, Employee Mileage
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe & Fittings
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings
Knox Industrial Supplies, Lubricant
L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Service
Charles Meriam Company, Instrumentation
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, Chemicals & Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
Sy Nielson Service, Calibrate Balances
Nolex Corporation, Specification Supplies
Occidental College, Ecology Trawl
Orange County Farm Supply Company, Insecticide
Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp
Pacific Industrial Supply, Tools
Pacific Pumping Company, Pump
Parker Printing Service, Inventory Count Cards
Peterson Company, Buoy Maintenance
RFL c/o Luscombe Engineering Company, Instrumentation
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage
The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Fittings
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum
Santa Ana Dodge, Truck Parts
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors
Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies ·
City of Seal Beach, Water
Seal Methods, Inc., Pump Packing
Sepor Laboratory Supply, Lab Supplies
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint & Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Singer Mailing Equipment, Postage Meter
Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service
Southern California Edison, Power .
South Orange Supply, Grounds Maintenance Supplies
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Bottled Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Bumpers
Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline, Petroleum Products
Starow Steel, Steel
The Suppliers, Tools
Surveyors Service Company, Manuals
J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement
Tatkin Company, Flame Arrestor
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Electric Cart Parts
C. O. Thompson Petroleum, Kerosene
Travel Buffs, Air Fare Various Meetings
Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts
Truck and Auto Supply, Truck Parts
J. G. Tucker & Son, Safety Equipment
"A-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
90.6~
88.4~
19.95
1. 75
41.22
458.09
12.60
6.17
1,626.17
48.60
1,439.78
1,647.34
132.34 ,
154.60
57.39
400.00 .
14.84
1L48
146.52
1,063.18
192. 92 .
1,223.36
174.93
84.00
73.02
154. If'
195.5.,...,,
93.05
263.73
149.92
63.22
79.69
206.38
471.27
24.18
69.96
395.00
7 J 011. 99
101.59
310.16
304.33
5,684.42.
87.48
186.76
32.05
388.55
58.30
86.70
482.83
94.66
292.0C
436.52~
719. 27
31.80
II A-211
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
3~"'33
~.34
30735
30736
30737
30738
30739
30740
30741
30742
30743
30744
30745
30746
Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Delivery
United States Elevator Corporation, Maintenance Agreement
University of California Irvine, JPL Computer Model
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
Warren & Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fitting
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Supplies
Thomas L. Woodruff, Legal Services
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
Everett H. York Company, Engine Parts
"A-3" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
9.96
10.05
33.00
4.00
1,965.06
41.94
27.54
13.50
3.39
621. 37
240.53
1,875.50
20.70
40.28
$ 69,141.90
"A-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
CAPITAL OITTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO.
30622
30623
30624
·30625
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Service, JPL
John Carollo Engineers and Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2-23
Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services P2-8~8
Santa Ana Dodge, Pickup Trucks Specification A-080 Rebid
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
II A-4 II AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
'1J
$ 449.78
103,792.75
1,230.00
26,076.00
$ 131,548.53
$ 200,690.43
II A-4!'
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
30611 Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 1-14 $ 27,074.00
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
30612
30613
F.W. Dodge Division of McGraw-Hill, Request for Proposals Sleepy Hollow $
Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4
99.·oo
1,605.00
~614
30615
30616
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Nutrilite, Refund Permit Overpayment
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-20-2, 3-21-2
Smith Emery Comp~ny, Pipe Testing 3-21-2
"B-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
$ 1,704.00
32.50
2,346.00
208.00
$ 2,554.00
$ 2,586.50
"B-1"
WARRANT NO.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
30617 Newporter Inn, Refund Permit Overpayment
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
30618 Simpson-Steppat, Engineering Services 5-20-A
"B-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
""1111'
AMOUNT
17.50
85. 30 .
$ 102.80
"B-2-"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 17, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
~
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30619
30620
30621
"C"
Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way Mapping
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8 & 7-6-9
Smith Emery Company, Pipe_Testing 7-6-9
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
AMOUNT
2,127.50
4,158.00
237.25
$ 4,395.25
$ 6,522.75
II C"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30784
30785
30786
30787
30788
30789
30790
30791
30792
30793
30794
30795
30796
30797
30798
30799
30800
30801
30802
30803
30804
30805
30806
30807
30808
30809
30810
30811
30812
30813
30814
30815
30816·
30817
30818
30819
30820
30821
30822
30823
30824
30825
30826
30827
30828
30829
30830
30831
30832
30833
30834
30835
Air California, Air Fare Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Cleaner
Aljac Supply Company, Pipe Fittings
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts
Ameren Corrosion Control Division, Amerplate
City of Anaheim, Water
The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing
V. B. Anderson, Valves
Audio Visual Industries, Projection Lamp
Barnes & Delaney, Couplings
Beckman Instruments, Electrode
Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Valve
Big 5 Sporting Goods, Sampling Supplies
Blue Diamond Materials, Asphalt
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuild Magtronic
Building News, Inc., Constru.ction Bulletins
Burke Engineering Company, Motor
C & R Reconditioning Company, Machining
CS Company, Valves
California Auto Collision, Inc., Body Work
College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
County.Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Derbys Topsoil, Road Base
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Electric Balancing Company, Balance Scroll
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Services
Enterprise Printing Company, Office Supplies
Farr Company, Filters
Fischer & Porter Company, Valve, Chlorination Parts
Compressor Products Division, Resurface Valve
Freeway Stores, Office Supplies
Fuel Injection Sales & Service, Fuel Injectors
GAF Corporation, Blueprint Machine Repair
General Electric Company, Lamps
General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies
General Telephone Company
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
HMK Marketeer Limited, Electric Cart Parts
.Hach Chemical Company, Inc., 'IUrbidity Kit
Halsted & Hoggan, Inc., Electric Supplies
Harrington Industrial, Valve
Hewlett Packard, Recharger
House of Batteries, Battery
Howard Supply Company, Valve & Regulator Parts
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Equipment Rental, Truck Rental
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardwar~
JD Packaging & Sales, Tape
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICfS
$
AMO UN ,.._,,
115. 00
114 .10
96.96
43.73
4.77
69.91
775.25
101.76
29.30
270.99
445.20
156.46
28. 61 .
166.00
281.10
37.85
275.98
570.00
519.17
129.10
68.50
1,387.54
7 ,521.53
6. o'-"'
23.93
40.00
397.50
160.14
125.00
3,000.00
84.17
76.18
168.08
132.00
19.08
177.16
54. 94,
527.57
1,633.58
220.40'
195.57
101. 31
38.50
207.99
314.62
21.20
22.90
421. 35
819.6~
466.47
497.20
324.57
"D-1"
JOINT DISTRICTS Ci.AIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WA.RRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
~
30836
30837
30838
30839
30840
30841
30842
30843
30844
30845
30846
30847
30848
•30849
30850
30852
30853
30854
30855
30856
30857
30858
30859
'70860
-..-<l861
30862
30863
30864
30865
30866
30867.
30868
30869
30870
30871
30872
30873
30874
30875
30876
30877
30878
30879
30880
30881
30882
30883
30884
~'l885
~886
30887
30888
Keenan ·pipe & Supply Company, Couplings, Pipe Fittings
King Bearing, Inc., Fittings, Bushings, Pump Parts
Knox Industrial Supplies, Ladders, Signs
LBWS, Inc., Oxygen, Grinding Wheel, Pipe Fittings, Welding Rod
L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service
McFarland Partitions, Warehouse Office Partitions
McMaster-Carr Supply Company, Wire, Electric Supplies
Master Blueprint & Supply, Drafting Supplies
Metropolitan Supply Company, Air Filters
Mitchell Manuals, Inc., Manual
E.B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
National Chemsearch, Cleaner
City of Newport Beach, Water
Omniproducts of California, Building Maintenance Supplies
Orange County Equipment Company, Maintenance Supplies
Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
. Oxygen Service, JPL Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
M C Patten Corporation, Gauge
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Porter Boiler Service, Inc., Ignition Rod
Postmaster, Postage
Harold Primrose Ice., Sampling Supplies
Pylam Products Company, Sampling Supplies
Rodney Hunt Company, Sampling Supplies
S & A Distributing, Hardware
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Sampling Supplies
Shepherd Machinery Company, Caterpillar Parts
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint & Paint Supplies
Sidu Manufacturing Company, Pipe Plug
Sims Industrial Supply, Welding Equipment
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Water Company, Water
Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline
The Suppliers, Hardware & Tools
Bruce Tay~or, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Switch
Thompson Lacquer Company, Paint & Paint Supplies
Trexler Compressor, Inc., Compressor Parts
Truck & Auto Supply, Truck Parts, Block Repair
Tustin Water Works, Water
United Parcel Service, Delivery
United States Equipment, Inc., Valve Channel
VWR Scientific, Test Equipment, Lab Supplies
John R. Waples, Odor Consultant
Warren & Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fittings
Waukesha Engine Scrvicenter, Engine Parts
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Rod
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
468.85
325.04
224.50
237.36
1,328.73
1,605.00
136.28
45.08
31.30
40.16
797.12
373.12
348.06
42.27
56.18
544.88
148.30
473.26
55.94
192.36
19.24
500.00
31.80
42.00
4,229.40
52.95
630.20
321.03
161.76
21.19
49.13
661.46
172.63
90.10
1,995.62
879.61
3.26
694.51
500.73
12.90
690.47
603.16
233.09
2,051.27
67.31
20.35
539.01
384.01
230. 80
34.27
409.08
1,376.15
"D-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30889 Wilson Engine & Equipment Company, Switch
30890 Everett H. York Company, f~se
30891 Zellar's Cycle, Bicycles
"D-3" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
~
$ 175.96
84.80
539.84
$ 49,468.13
"D-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
l""RRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ....,
30773
30774
30775
30776
30777
30778
30779
30780
30781
30782
. 30783
Aljac Supply Company, Portable Vise
Bowen Engineering, Inc., Engineering Services, JPL-ACTS
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, JPL, Facilities Plan
John Carollo Engineers & Greeley and Hansen, Engr P2-23
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, 9hm Meter
Charles P. Crowley Company, JPL Equipment Rental
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
J. B. Gilbert & Associates, Engineering Services EIS Facilities Plan
Meyer Machinery Company, Sheet Metal Brake
Pepsi Company Building Systems, JPL Office Rent
Randle & West Company, JPL Equipment
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CORF
"D-4" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 121.53
3,500.00
1,203.75
7,430.49
524.70
1,272.00
246.98
9,846.88
4,181.70
191.86
96.33
$ 28,616.22
$ 78,084.35
"D-4 II
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30768 County of Orange, Easement 2-14-4
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
30769 Federal Mogul Arrowhead Products, Easement 3-21-2
"E" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
""
AMOUNT
$ 111,605.00
$ 2 ,501. 00 .
"E"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 31, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
~
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
. 30770 The Register, Bid Notice, OPA Hearing
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
30771 City of Orange, Repaint Traffic Lines & Markings 7~6-8
30772 Nellie M. Reeve, Easement 7-6-9
"F" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
65.90
489.92
5,500.00
$ 5,989.92
$ 6,055.82
"F" -
RESOLUTION NO. 76-149
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
JOB NO. J-7-3
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI-
CATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION-ENGINEERING
BUILDING ADDITION AND REMODEL, JOB NO.
J-7-3
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETE~INE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers, for
construction of Administration-Engineering Building Addition and Remodel', Job
No.·J-7-3, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized.and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., October 12,
. 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' engineers
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to
award contract for said Job No. J-7-3 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2,
3, 5, 6, 7 and 11.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
"G" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "G"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-150
AWARDING SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR PURCJ~SE OF THIRTY-TWO (32) DIGESTER DOME
HANGERS, SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, S,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
'Boards of Directors by the Dist~icts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made to Production Steel Company, •Inc. for Purchase of Thirty-Two (32) Digester
Dome Hangers, Specification No. PW-053, and the bid tabulation and proposal
submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Specification No. PW-053 be awarded
to Production Steel Company, Inc. in the total amount of $15,508.00, in accordance
with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of District No. 1 acting
fo~ itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for
said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents
therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(a) -ALL DISTRICTS
Eng i n c er ' s Es t i ma t e $ 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 q
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
·Date August 31, 1976 11 :00 a.m.
Contract For: PURCHASE OF 32 DIGESTER DOME HANGERS
SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Production Steel Co., Inc.
Carson s15,508.oo
2. Duramet
Fountain Valley 15,894.70
3. Hoertig Iron Works
City of Industry 17,280.00
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
II I II AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "I" -
...,,,,,,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFO~NIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. ·1
----~~~~~--~~~~
::->NTRACTOR: BEVERLY PACIFIC CORPORATIGrJ DATE August 31, JQ76
.JB:NEW FIBERGLASS DUCTIJORK FOR HEAD\/ORKS 11 C11 FRESH AIR VFNTl!flT!DtJ svsn:n .JOB NO P\./-047
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
~~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the folloHing additions to or
.~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Extend allowed time for contract completion by 35 days.
Reason Contractor obtained and constructed new molds which enabled him to
more easily comply with the job specifications and to produce higher
quality ductwork. ·
Original Contract Date
Original Completion Date
Original Contract Time
Time Extension this C.O.
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
January 29, 1976
July 27, 1976
180 Calendar Days
35 Calendar Days
35 Calendar Days
215 Calendar Days
August 31, 1976
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
$ 29' 664. 00
$ ____ ~0_._00 __ :--~~
$ 0.00
--~~--~~~~-
$ 29,664.00
~oard authorization date: Approved:
...,,,,,,
~. :jy--------------=---~--=---Eng i nee r . . ~ .. ·'
Cont rile tor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ______ ~~-----------~:-:::----:---~
Chief Engir.ce
II J II AGENDA ITEM #8(E) -ALL DISTRICTS II J II
II K"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-151
ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-047 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-047 AS COMPLETE AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Beverly Pacific Corporation, has completed
the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for NEW FIBERGLASS
pUCTWORK FOR HEADWORKS "C" FRESH AIR VENTILATION SYSTEM, JOB NO. PW-047, on the
31st of August, 1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms
of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3. That New Fiberglass Ductwork for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Venti-
lation System, Job No. PW~047, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
th~ terms of the contract therefor, dated January 29, 1976; and,
Section 4. That 'the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Beverly Pacific Corporation,
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance ·of New-Fiberglass Ductwork
for Headworks "C" Fresh Air Ventilation System, Job No. PW-047, is hereby approved;
and,
Section 6. TI1at the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on
behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II K"
~
--COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.·o. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FQUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO.
-------~-------~-~ ::~NTRACTOR: lnstrumentation/Mechanfcal Systems, Inc. DATE August 31, 1976
•. : 3 : ___ A_UT_O_M_A_T_I c_G_A_T_E_O_PE_R_A_T_O_R_S_-_D_I V_E_R_S_l_O_N_S_T_R_U_C_T_U_R_E _A_T_· _P_L_A_NT_~_rn_. __ -_J_O_B_N_O_. _P_W_-_0 __ 5_2 ____ _
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00
----~--~------
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
·1~tract work are hereby authorized and as co~pensation therefor, the follo.-1ing additions to or
~ductions from the contract price are hereby app1oved. -,
Revise insurance requirements for job.
Public Liability ar.d·Property Damage:
One person
More than one person
Property damage
Motor Vehicle Public Liability and Property Damage
One person
More than one person
Property damage
sPecified requirements were excessive for job of this size.
0 rig i na 11 y
Specified
$1,000,000 /3~000,000
500,000
200,000·
500,000
00,000
Original Contract Price $
Prev. Auth. Changes $
This Change {ADD) (DEDUCT) ·s
Amended Contract Price $
Changed to
$ 300,00.0
J·,000,000
100,000
!
i
$
1 .. 0· .. o.· , oov 300,000
100/,000
·"/
22,688.00
0. 00.
0.00
22,688.00
~:xird authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
Assoc i a t e Eng i n cc r
·.•
By ________ ~~-----~~-:--::-".=---:--
Ch i cf Engine~
Contrilctor
"L" AGENDA ITEM #8(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II L"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-152
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-9-2 AS CO~lPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-9-2 AS COMPLETE AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, F. T. Ziebarth Company, has completed the
project in accordance with the terms of the contract for AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS,
DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-052, on the 31st of August, 1976;
'and,
Section 2. That by letter, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers,
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Plant No. 1,
Job No. PW-052, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of
the contract therefor, dated February 26, 1976; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with F. T. Ziebarth Company,
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Automatic Gate Operators,
Diversion Structure at Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of
District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on '"-""
behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED 3t a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(H) -ALL DISTRICTS II M"
II NII
RESOLUTION NO. 76-153
AMENDING RESOLlITION NO. 75-167
(POSITIONS AND SALARIES)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION
NO. 75-167, AS AMENDED
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, is hereby
further amended to adjust the salary range for the following position classifi-
cation:
EXHIBIT II B-3"
SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL
Position Range
Classification Classification No. Hourly
90080 Chief of Industrial 62 $9.39/11.69
Waste
Approximate
Monthly
Equivalent
Salary
$1,627/2,027
Section 2. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that
conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and,
Section 3. That this resolution shall become effective September 10, 1976.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -ALL DISTRICTS II N"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-154
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-167
(POSITIONS AND SALARIES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING POSITIONS AND SALARIES RESOLUTION
NO. 75-167, AS AMENDED
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts. Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 75-167, as amended, is
hereby further amended to add pGsition classifications thereto, as set forth
below:
EXHIBIT "B-2"
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
Range
Positions Personnel Classification
Position
Classification No. Hourly
Approxim~
Monthly
Equivalent
Salary
II O"
1
1
1
0
10500
10840
Administrative Aide
Clerk
647C 4.87/5.92 $844/1026
4.40/hr max
Section 2. That Resolution No. 75-167,_as amended, is hereby further
amended by the addition of Exhibit "C", dated September, 1976; and,
Section 4. That Exhibit "C" dated July, 1976, is hereby rescinded; and,
Section S. That any other resolution or motion or portions thereof that
conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and,
Section 6. That this resolution shall become effective September 10, 1976.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(0) -ALL DISTRICTS II O"
II P"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-165-2
APPHOVING AGHIDll'.NT f<E r1mn1ASF. Mm SALE OF EN~r~tENTS
AN0-t\-U:1i1il1f1 ii ~l;-·Ace 1:·1·r,\.:--;i :·1:"· ffF-1:-.\~; 1:~1·1 :-~-rr~c;-f:ifo~ITI\ Nt.s-;-r"A.
BR\'A: .. fr-.-Jlf.-.-lrAT.:"':-j{·L-·LUNTRAC°Y!r r;us-. -2-:-f:f::r"1-2-:-r:r:5
A RESOLUTION OF TllE BOAHD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORA~GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROV H~r. AGREH!ENT FOR PUHCHASE A.'-;0 SALE OF TOIPORARY
A.'m PER.'-l . -NT U~DERCRou:-.;o EASE~IENTS. A."\O AUTI IOR IZ I ~~G
ACCEPTAi'\LL OF GRANTS OF EASEMENT FIW~f ERNEST A. BRYANT•
JR., ET AL. IN CONNECT.ION WITH CONTRACTS NOS. 2-14-4
AND 2-14-5
• • • • * • * • * * ~ * *
Tile Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE A.'\D ORDER:
Section 1. That Agreement re Purchase and Sale of Temporary and Permanent
Underground Easements dated August 2, 1976, by and between Ernest A. Bryant, Jr.,
et al. and County Sanitation District No. 2, relative to acquisition of easements
in connection with construction of Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contracts 2-14-4
and 2-14-5, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the General Manager is hereby ~uthorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General
Counsel; and,
Section 3. That those certain Grants of Easement dated
~~~~~~~~-
wherein easementsin the vicinity of the Santa Ana River and Weir Canyon for sanitary
sewer purposes are granted to County Sanitation District No. 2, are hereby accepted
from Ernest A. Bryant, Jr., ct al.; and,
Section 4. That the real property over which said easements are gra~ted are
more particularly described and sh0\,11 on Exhibits "A" and "B", .attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 5. That said easements are granted in connection with construction
of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, and the
Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-S; and,
Section 6. That payment, pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned purchase
and sale agreement, is hereby authorized in the following amounts:
Permanent Easements
Temporary Easements
Damaged/Removed Citrus Trees
$14,550.00
13,500.00
13,980.00
$42,030.00
Section 7. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 be author1ied and directed to record said casements in the Official
Records of Orange County, California, as provided in the purchase and sale agreement.
PASSED AND AflOPTED at a rcr,ular meeting held September S, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8Cr) -DISTRICT 2 II P"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
7 C.O. NO·------------------~,_~
~-CONTRACTOR: KASLER CORPORAT I Otl & L. H. \JOODS & SONS, I UC. OATE ___ .... A .... u ...... g.-.us.._t.__3._.1_._..._1"""'9,,_76.._ ___ _
JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5. CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (at?'OU'~ $ 1,423.82
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
· contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
--deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Lowry & Associates letter dated 12-17-75 and Yorba Linda County Water
District letter dated 2-2-76 -Letter from-Kasler-Woods dated 6-15-76 and
the Districts letter dated 6-24-76.
A. ADD: Water Utility interference at Station 850+70 $1 , 423. 82
B. ADD: Relocate the following manholes:
Existing Station
891+50.00
902+50.00
924+50.00
New Station
891+98.00
904+93.78
927+70.oo
No cost for this change order. All costs will be
paid ·On the same unit price as stated in the contract.
Any deviations will be taken care of in the adjustment
of quantities at the end of the p~oject.
C. ADD: Manhole at Station 920+43.46
Costs for this manhole will be at unit price and paid for in Item
22 of the contract and billed to Yorba Linda County Water District.
This will be reflected in the adjustment of quanities at the end
of the contract.
No time extension with this change order.
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976
By ------------------------------------Consulting Engineer
By ------------------------------------Contractor
Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 74,295.70.
This Change (ADD) (~~~~~~) $ 1,423.82
Amended Contract Price $ 4,316676.52
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, ~alifornia
By
------------------------~--~~ Chief Enginee
"Q" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q) -DISTRICT 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO. 8 -----------------------CONTRACTOR: KASLER CORPORATION & L. H. WOODS & SONS, I NC. DATE August 31. 1976
---------------------------~
JOB: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT 2-14-4
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~ $ $8,320.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Kaster-Woods letters of 1-9-76 and 2-9-76 and the Districts letter of
2-19-76 to Kasler-Woods.
For delays sustained by the District's Contractor resulting in the
necessity to reschedule construction of the contract work for the
Yorba Regional Park. The District's Contractor was directed to
reschedule his work.and to proceed in accordance with the instructions
from the County on the. basis of the County's construction scheduJe of
the park.
·The District's Contractor sustained additional costs in the d~lays which
resulted in additional equipment rental costs.
COST: Total additional cost $8,320.00
No additional time extension with this change order.
Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 75,719.52
This Change (ADD) ( Bgrrn~t) $ 8,320.00
Amended Contract Price $ 4,324,996.52
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved:
~
-By------------------------~~-----------Con s ult in g Engineer
By __________________________________ ___
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By ____________________ ~~---~---
C hi cf Enginec
II Rll AGEMDA ITEM #8(R) -.DISTRICT 2 II Rll
-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE.
fQUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. 9 ------------------!'4TRACTOR: KASLER CORPORATION & L·. H. WOODS & SONS, INC. 0 ATE August 31, 1976
:-3: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4
Amount of th ts Change Order {ADD) (OOOOOT) $ 6,808.01
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
~~tract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~ductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE:
:
Kalser-Woods letter and invoice of 8/18/76 and
Districts letter of 8/24/76.
FOR: Additional wo~k necessitated during boring operations at the intersection of
COST:
La Palma and Imperial Stat.ion 842+12 caused by existing 8 11 sewer being other than
as shown on the plans.
Total Add: $6,808.01
No additional time extension with this ·change order.
Original Contract Price $ 4,240,957.00
.·
Prev. Auth. Changes $ __ ..... s~_,_o....,3 9_.-':'."5_2 __
:.=-oard authorization date: September 8, 1976
v
---------------~--~--~~------~~ Consulting Engineer
.. -y _________________ _
Contractor
This Change (ADD) (~B3~«l) $ 6,808.0l
----------~~--~
Amended Contract Price $ 4,331 ,804.53
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By----------~----~--~~~ Chief Engint
"S" AGENDA ITEM #SCs) -DISTRICT 2 "S" .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
~ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
~ C.O. N0. ___ 1~0~------~------~
.-7RACTOR: KASLER CORPORATION & L. H. \.IOODS & SONS, INC. DATE August 31, 1976
• SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH 5, CONTRACT NO. 2-:14-4
Amount of thl s Change Order (~~) (DEDUCT) } (2,953.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
·:ract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~c·tions from the contract price are here.by_ appr9ved.
Adjustment of Quantities:
ADD:
Change in Quantity
I teinll Unit From to Difference at Total
22 V.F. 148 175 27* 204. 00/v. f. $5,508.oo
23 . V. F. 44 45'. 5 1.° 5 226.00/v.f . 339.00
24 V. F. 487 487.4.· o.4 200. 00/v. f. 80.00
25 C;Y. 17 25 8 90.00/c.y. 720.00
26 each 18 23 5 1,500.00/ea. 7,500.00
TOTAL ADD $14, 147 .00
D~UCT:
30 L. F. 171 0 171. 100.00/L.F. $17, 100.00
TOTAL DEDUCT ($17, 100.00)
*21 feet of this to be billed to the Yorba Linda County Water District.
The remaining 6 feet was necessary for the bringing of these MHs to proper
grade. ·
TOTAL DEDUCT ($2,953.00)
Original Contract Price $ 4.240.957.00
Prev; Auth. Chang·es $ 90,847.53
-
This Change ~~ (DE DUCT) $ (2,953.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 4,328,851.53
~ard authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved:
,•
"T"
Consulting Engineer
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By----------~-----------:--=-----~--Ch i e f Eng i net:
AGENDA ITEM #8Cr) -DISTRICT 2 -"T"
II U"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-166-2
ACCEPT! NG CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
2-14-4 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc.,
J.V., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract
for SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, REACH S, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4, on the 31st of
August, 1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Lowry & Associates, District's engineers, have
I
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred. in said
engineer's .recommendation, which said recommendation is.hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Santa Ana Interceptor, Reach 5, Contract No. 2-14-4, is
hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor,
dated October 15, 1975; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kasler Corporation &
L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., J.V., setting forth the terms and conditions for
acceptance of said Santa Ana Interceptor, Reach S, Contract No. 2-14-4, is
hereby approved; and,
Section 7. 111at the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hercb~ authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8; 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(u) -DISTRICT 2 II U"
"V-1"
FORMAL PROTCST AND CLAIM
TO: Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District ·No. 2
P • 0 • Box 812 7
Fountain Valley, California 92708
RE: Formal Protest and Claim of Vido Artukovich & Son,
Inc., regarding Sanitation District No. 2, Contract
No. 2-16-2
Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. hereby and herewith
formally protests, pursuant to Section 8-4 of the Standard
Specifications of the above specified contract, the decision
of the Chief Engineer of Orange County Sanitation District
No. 2, made in his letter of August il, 1976,· denying
Claimant's claim under the contract for $67,960.85. In
addition, formal claim is hereby made for said sum of
$67,960.85 from Orange County Sanitation District No. 2. By
reason of the facts herein particularly set forth in detail,
Claimant alleges and sets forth its claims as follows:
A. The name of the Claimant is Vida Artukovich
& Son, Inc., a Class "A" general contract.or, whose
address is 11155 Rush Street, South El Monte, Califor-
nia.
B. For purposes of correspondence in connection
with this for~al protest and claim, Claimant requests
that it be addressed in care of its attorneys, Patrick
J. Duffy, Esq., Monteleone & McCrory, 5900 Wilshire
Blvd., Suite 2900, Los Angeles, California 90036.
c. The circumstances of Claimant's claim are
as follows:
AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(l) DISTRICT 2 "V-1"
"V-2"
-2-
Protest and Claim One
1. In late 1975, Orange County Sanitation Dis-
trict No. 2 (hereinafter "District") advertised for bids to
be received from qualified contractors to construct a sewer
project known as the "Yorba Linda Force Main~ pursuant to
plans and specifications prepared by the said District and
pursuant to public competitive bidding.
2. Claimant Vida Artukovich & Son, Inc. (herein-
after "Claimant"), which was then and has been at all times
since, a Class "A" contractor so licensed by the State of
California, entered its sealed bid on the bid date of
January 6, 1976 to perform the work in strict accordance
with plans and specifications of the District.
3. Claimant was found to be the lowest respon-
sible bidder and under date of January 29, 1976, Claimant
and the District entered into a written contract, No.
2-16-2, for the construction of the said Yorba Linda Force
Main between Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard pursuant
to the said plans and specifications.
4. Thereafter, Claimant was given a "Notice To
Proceed" under the contract and timely began the work.
While excavating in the area of contract station 21+50 on
March 9, 1976, Clairaant encountered in its trench an 87 inch
storm drain and other utility services which were incorrectly
located on the plans and which were shown on the plans to be
outside of Claimant's work area when in fact they were
directly in the way.
S. The interfering utilities made it impossible
for Claimant to proceed further in that area. Claimant there-
upon promptly notified the District in writing of the 87 inch
AGENDA ITEM #8Cv)(l) -DISTRICT 2
•.
"V-3"
-3-
storm drain and other utilities obstructing the work right-
of-way and requested the District expeditiously solve the
problem and inform Claimant what was to be done.
6. In order to minimize its damages and expedite
the project, Claimant moved its forces to other parts of the
project on several occasions between March 9, 1976 and May 13,
1976 to complete other contract work while the District pre-
pared its redesign and change order for the area at station
21+50. These attempts were made more difficult by the fail-
ure of the District to obtain in a timely manner, permits
and right-of-way clearances from the State Department of
Transportation as required of it by the contract.
7. By May 13, 1976, Claimant had performed all
work it could perform on the project until the redesign in
the area of station 21+50 which the District orally pro-
mised would be soon forthcoming.
8. Between May 3, 1976 and June 25,.1976, Claim-
ant stood by ready to promptly perform the change order work
at a cost to it of $67,960.85 as detailed by the invoices
sent to the District, numbers 50-11, 50-12, 50-13, ,qnd 50-15,
which are attached hereto as Exhibits "A", "B", "C", and
"D", respectively, and incorporated herein by reference.
9. On July 1, .~976, the District finally completed
its redesign and issued Change Order No. 1 for the
extra work. Pursuant to its work under Change Order No. 1,
Claimant has earned $67,960.85 above the amount authorized by
said Change Order and the same is now due and owing to
Clainant.
10. Claimant has lodged all required protests to
the refusal of the District to pay the above sum and has
AGENDA ITEM #8Cv)(l) -DISTRICT 2
' '
"V-3!'.
"V-4"
-4-
performed all the terms and conditions on its part so far to
be performed by it under said contract.
Protest and Claim Two
11. Claimant hereby refers to and incorporates by
this reference each and every allegation and paragraph of
its Protest and Claim One as if set forth in full herein.
12. On May 14, 1976, the District ordered in
writing the above project to be shut-down for the refusal
.of Claimant to perform extra work not required of it under
the contract without a Change Order and without payment as a
volunteer. Said order was a breach of contract, but was
obeyed by Clair.1ant inaspl;ich as there was no work for it to
perform anyway. Said project remained idle under the shut-
down order until on or about June 25, 1976 when the same was
rescinded.
13. The said shut-down order was a pure artifice
and device of the District to try to avoid the substantial
costs the District knew it would incur under the planned
Change Order No. 1 for Claimant's stand-by time. At said time
the District knew they were not yet ready with their redesign
of the area at station 21+50 and would not be ready for a
substantial period of time.
14. As a proximate result of said stop work order
and the underlying failure of the District to effect its re-
design until July 1, 1976, Claimant has bee.n· damaged in the
sum of $67,960.85 and the same is due and owing from the
District.
Third Protest and Claim
15. Claimant hereby refers to and incorporates by
this reference each and every allegation and paragraph of
AGENDA ITEM #8Cv)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "V-4"
"V-5"
-s-
its Protest and Claim One as if set forth in full herein.
16. As a matter of law the District impliedly
warranted in the contract that they had obtained all neces-
sary work rights-of-way and that their plans did not contain
such egregious errors as would result in substantial delays
of the project completion and that any errors would be cor-
rected expeditiously so as not to delay the work.
17. The District breached said warranty by failing
to provide right-of-way, by having defective plans and by
_failing to correct defects in a timely manner.
18. As a ~roximate result of such breach, Claim-
ant has been d_amaged in the su~ of $67,960.85 and the same is
due from the District.
Fourth Protest and Claim
19. Claimant hereby refers to and incorporates by
this reference each and every allegation and paragraph of
its Protest and Claim One as if set forth in full herein.
20. Government Code Section 4215 provides as
follows:
"In any contract to which a public agency
as.defined in Section 4401 i~ a party, the public
agency shall assume the responsibility, between the
parties to the contract, for the removal, relocation,
or protection of existing utilities located on the
site of any construction project that is a subject of
the contract, if such utilities are not identified
by the public agency in the plans and specifications
made a part of the invitation for bids. The contract
documents shall include provisions that the contractor
shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay ·in
AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "V-5"
•.
"V-6"
-6-
completion of the project, when such delay was caused
by the failure of the public agency or the owner of
the utility to provide for removal or relocation of
the existing utility facilities.
•Nothing herein shall preclude the public
agency from pursuing any appropriate renedy against the
utility for delays which are the responsibility of the
utility.
"Nothing herein shall be construed to relieve
the utility from any obligation as required either by
law or by contract to pay the cost of removal or reloca-
tion of ~xisting utility facilities.
"If the contractor while performing the con-
tract discovers utility facilities not identified by
the public agency in the contract plans or specif i-
cations, he shall immediately notify the public agency
in writing."
21. Pursuant to Government Code Section 4215,
Claimant is owed the sum of $67,960.85 from the District.
D. Conclusion. Claimant requests that the denial
of the Chief Engineer of $67,960.85 be reversed by
this Board and said sum paid ~o Claimant within forty-
five (45) days hereof in accord with Section 8.4 of
the District's Standard Specifications.
DATED: August 20, 1976.
MONTELEONE & McCRORY
AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "V-6 ':
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE: 714
540·2910
962-2411
P. 0. SOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Vido Artukovich & Son
11155 Rush
A~gust 11, 1976
South El Monte, California 91733
Attention: Mr. Anthony Artukovich
Subject: Yorba Linda Foice Main -tontract No. 2-16-2
This office is in receipt of a letter signed on your behalf by
Mr. Patrick J. Duffy of Monteleone & McCrory, who indicated in
his letter of August 9th, that they represent you in the matter
of disputed extra work claimed by you regarding the above-
mentioned contract. As engineer for the Districts, as set forth
in Section 1-2 of the Standard Specifications for this contract,
I have reviewed your demand and am hereby advising you that your
claim for standby costs in the amount of $67,960.85 is denied.
This denial is hereby binding on this contract· unless, within
ten days of the date of this letter, you shall file a formal
protest through the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2. Pursuant to Section 8-4 of said Standard
Specifications, you are hereby informed that if you do file a
formal protest against the engineer's decision, the Board of
Directors shall consider and render a formai decision within
45 days of receipt of same.
REL:hje
cc: Thomas L. Woodruff
Patrick J. Duffy
REGISTERED MAIL
"W" AGENDA ITEM #8(v)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "W"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. ________________ __
:.ONTRACTOR: George Mi 1 ler Construct jon Comoaoy DATE August 23 1976
~~B: ___ M_a~n~h_o_l~e~R~e~p~la~c~e~m~e~n~t •• _L~o-s;.....;..A_l~a-m~i~to~s;;;....;S~u-b_-_r~r-u_nk_.~c~o~n~t-r~ac~t.-.:.~~lo~.__..3_-~8R~--1..._ ______________________ _
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
·=ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Due to availability and delivery of materials, the fol lowing time adjustment is required:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension This C.O.
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976
.. By------------------------~-----------Consu 1 ting Engineer
--By ________________________________ __
Contractor
May 26, 1976
30 Ca 1 enda r Days
June 25, 1976
68 Ca 1 enda r Days
0 Calendar Days
98 Ca 1 enda r Days
August 31, 1976
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Chcmges
Thts Change (ADD) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
$ 14,999.00
$ o. 00
$ 0.00
$ 14,999.00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Orange County, California
.,
OF
By ______ --------------------~--~ Chief Engince
"X" AGENDA ITEM #8Cw) DISTRICT 3 "XII
"Y"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-167-3
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
3-8R-1 AS COMPLETE A~D APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has
completed the project in accordance with the terms of the contract for MANHOLE
,REPLACEMENT, LOS ALAMITOS SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-1, on the 31st of August,
1976; and,
Section 2. Th.at by letter, the District's Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms
of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3. That Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos ·sub-Trunk, Contract No.
3-8R-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the
contract therefor, dated May 26, 1976; and,
Section 4. That· the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. Th.at the Final Closeout Agreement with George Miller Construction
Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for a~ceptance of Manhole
Replacement, Los Alamitos Sub-Trunk, Contract No. 3-8R-1, is hereby approved; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(x) ·-DISTRICT 3 "Y"
~UUNIY ~ANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
=ONTRACTOR: U.S. PIPE AND FOUUDBY CO.
C.O. NO·~----~~~~~
DATE August 18, 1976
_:QB: BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER -COtHRACT NO, 5-20A (MATER I AL PURCHASE ONLY)
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~~iurnx) $ 23.980.57
In accordance with contract provisions, the following ·changes in the contract and/or
=ontracf work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
.=eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
~ ln~rease from 8,600 L.F. to 9,620 L.F. or 1 ,020 L.F. of 24 11 Class 50 ductile iron pipe
with bel I and spigot ends and push-on joints including polyethylene encasement.
1,020 L.F~@ $20.46/L.F. = $20,869.20
Add three (3) 24 11 x 24 11 x 8 11 bell x bel 1 x flange tees including bl ind flange and bolts.
Three (3) @ $632.33 = $1,896~99
Add t\'/O (2) 24 11 x 24 11 x 611 bel 1 x bel 1 x flange tees including bl ind flange and bolts.
Two (2) @ $607.19 = $1,214.38
TOTALS: 1 , 020 L. F. of 24 11 duet i 1 e i ran pipe
3 24 11 x 24 11 x 8 11 tees
= '$20,869.20
= 1,896.99
2 -24" x 24 11 x 611 tees = 1 , 21-4. 38
$23,980.57
There Will be no time adjustment made.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Chang.es
This Change (ADD) (Sfg~MKI)
Amended Contract Price
::oard authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved:
$ 184.754.25
$ 0.00
$ 23,980.57
$ 208,734.82
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
¥--~~~~--~--~~~~~~--~~~ Consulting Engineer
y----~--~------~--------~--~----
By--------------------~~:--::~-:----C hie f Enginee
Contractor.
"Z" AGENDA ITEM #8(z) -DISTRICT 5 "Z"
~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FQUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
c.o. NO. 2
-~ONTRACTO~ U.S. Pipe and Foundrv Company DATE Augy st 31, 1976
-JB: BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER -CONTRACT 5-20A (MATER I AL PURCHASE ONLY)
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) C~f j)~£x) $ 304.05
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
=ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Adjustment of Quantities:
Increase from 2 to 3, or add 1, 24 11 45° bend with bell and spigot ends
and push-on joints.
1 @ $304.05 = $304.05
,.
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976
try'
------------------~---=--:-----==--~--Cons u 1 ting Engineer
By..-----------------------------------Contractor
Original Contract Price $ 184,754.25
Prev. Auth. Chan~es $ 23,980.57
This Change (ADD) (DE DUCT) $ _ __..3_0_4 _. 0~5. __ _
Amended Contract Price $ 209,038.87
Approved:
COUNTY SAN I TAT I ON D t STRI CTS 0 F
Orange County, California
By ____________________ ~__,,~~---
Ch i e f Enginee
II AA II AGENDA ITEf1i #8(AA) -DISTRICT 5 ".4A II
"BB"
August 20, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
Gentlemen:
Presented herewith for your Honorable Body to consider is our
petition to annex Tract No. 9072 to the County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County.
A metes and bounds description is enclosed as Exhibit 11 A11 and a
map attached as Exhibit 11 811
•
I hereby agree to pay the Annexation Acreage -Fees and processing
costs as necessary. I have enclosed a check for $325. 00 to cover
processing costs.
I also certify that the territory to be annexed contains 10.04 acres
and the land contains no inhabitants.
I also certify that according to the last Tax Assessor's Rolls, the
property shown hereon as Tract No. 9072 was A.P. #93-421-07, 08,
with a total assessed valuation of $42,160.
Very truly yours,
HILLCREST VILLAGE, A Limited Partnership
BY: I P S, A General Partnership
r. •
/·. ·;~---' l .,.--
...-I "' V""~ By : --..-.::. ~ ~· :.4.-' I /. . .,. /,
David M. Stone, General Partner
AGENDA ITEM #3(FF) -DISTRICT 7 "BB II
"-""'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -· 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOµNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO·----------~-----------
: :lNTRACTOR: SULLY-HILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY DATE _______ A~ll~G~US~T...._3~0~~·---19~7~6.__ _______ __
~S: TUSTIN ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 & 16. Contract 7-6-9
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DfDXIrf) $ $15 ! 3 27. 00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
--~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
A .• For backfill having a sand equivalent of 20 as provided for in Section 116-3 of the
·oetailed Specifications from Station 287+76 to Station 324+30.
B.
. 3 3 3854 ft. of trench for 1142 yd at $8.00/yd = $9, 136.00
(Price stipulated in bid item (c) ) .
For replacement of roadway on Reeve· property.
of the existing but not the replacement. The
obtaining the right-of-way.
The contract called for the removal
replacement is a requirement for
Grading, 411 aggregate ~ase, 211 asphaltic concrete at $0.89/ft 2
520 x 13 = 6760 ft
6760 ft 2 at $0.89ft 2 = $6,016.40
For signs, barricades· and paddles L.S. = $174.60
to reduce liability
TOTAL ADD: $15,327.00
No Time Extension is required.
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976
B~------------------~----------------Consulting Engineer
By __________________________________ __
Contractor
Original Contract Price $ 295. 826. 40
Prev. Auth. Chan~es $ ____ __.;o~·~o~o~------
This Change (ADD) ~ $ 15,32?.00
Amended Contract Price $ 3 11 ' 1 53. 40
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County,.California
By--------------------------~-----C hie f Engineer
"CC" AGENDA ITEM #8(GG) -DISTRICT 7-II cc II
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 ~ 10844 E~LIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. N0. ___ 2 ______________ _
. .JNTRACTOR: SULLY-Ml LLER CONTRACT I NG COMPANY DATE AUGUST 30, 1976 ~
:>B: TUSTIN ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 14 and REACHES 15 & 16, Contract 7-6-9
Amount of this Change Order (~~ (DEDUCT) $ $425 00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
~~ntract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Adjustment of Quantities: Change Estimated Quantities:
· Oeduc t
Item#
12
Unit
ea.
c.y.
From
2
10
. No Time Extension is required
noard authorization date: September 8, 1976
ay ----------------------------------Consulting Engineer
. By ________________________________ __
Contractor
To Di ff.
7 3
TOTAL DEDUCT:
@
$220.00
68.60
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (~D) (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
Total
$220.00
. 205.80
$425.80
$ 295,826.40
$ 1 5' 3 27. 00 .
s __ (_42_5_. a_o ) __ _
$ 310,727.60
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, ·California
By _____________________________ __
Chief Enginee1
"DD" AGENDA ITEM #8(HH)-bISTRICT 7 "DD II •
"EE"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-173-7
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF l~E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
7-6-9 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 111at the contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, has
completed the construction in acco.rdance with the terms of the contract for Tustin-
Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9,
on the 31st of August, 1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's
engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said
engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches
15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract therefor, dated April 29, 1976; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Sully-Miller Contracting
Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Tustin-Orange
Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, is
hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGEMDA ITEM #8(11) -DISTRICT 7 "EE"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. · 0 • B 0 X 8 1 2 7 -· 1 0 8 4 4 ELL I S AVENUE
FO~NTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO. ------------------------1NTRACTOR: Rewes-Schock, JV DATE August 26, 1076
JS: ·MANHOLE REPLACEP.ENT AND REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK COtURACI NO J J-JR-1
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ____ a~a_a~--~-------
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
~ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follo.-1ing additions to or
.~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Adjustment of quantities: De 1 e te I tern ·15.
.·
A"time extension due to delay in receiving encroachment permit
f.rom Ca 1 trans.
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this C.O.
Total Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Completion Date
March 25, 1976
120 Calendar Days
July 23, 1976
39 Calendar Days
39 Calendar Days
159 Calendar Days
August 31, 1976
Original Contract Price $ 37,253.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ (1, 140.00)
This Change (ADO) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 ----------------
Amended Contract Price $ 36,113.00
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976 Approved:
By __________________________________ __
Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION D ! STR I CTS 0 F
Orange County,. California
By--------------------------~-----Ch i e f Enginee!
"FF" AGENDA ITEM #8(JJ) -·DISTRICT 11 II FF II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-174-11
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUN1Y, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
11-lR-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Rewes-Schock, JV, has completed the project
in accordance with the terms of the contract for MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR,
NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-1, on the 31st of August, 1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the District's Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms
of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;
..._, and,
Section 3. That Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk,
Contract No. 11-lR-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance ~ith the
terms of the contract therefor, dated March 25, 1976; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Rewes-Schock, JV, setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Manhole Replacement and Repair,
Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-1, is hereby approved; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 19.76.
"GG" AGENDA ITEM #8(KK) -DISTRICT 11 "GG"
RESOLUTION NO.
ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR 1976-77
FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHINGUSE CHARGES
FOR CLASS I AND CLASS I I PERMITEES FOR TI1E
1976-77 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE
NO.
* * * ~ * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has hcretofor adopted Ordinance No. __ ,
an Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities;
and,·
WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall
annually adopt a charge for use of District facilities by Class I and Class II
permitees.
NOW, 11IEREFOR: The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That, pursuant to Section 302.6 of Ordinance No. __ , the
1976-77 fiscal year charge for use for Class I permitees is hereby established
as follows:
For Flow: $ per million gallons of flow ----
For Biochemical Oxygen Demand: $ per thousand pounds of B.O.D. ----
For Suspended Solids: $ per thousand pounds of S.S. ----
Section 2. That, pursuant to Section 303.1 of Ordinance No. __ , the
1976-77 fiscal year charge for use for Class II permitees is hereby established
as follows:
For Flow: $ per million gallons of flow ----
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September B, 1976.
"HH" AGENDA ITEM #8 -EACH DISTRICT "HH"
"II-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108""4 ELLIS AVCNUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71 '4) 5'40-2910
STAFF REPORT
VALUE ENGINEERING STUDY PLAN
FOR
75-MGD IMPROVED TREATMENT AT PLANT NO. 2
(Grant No. C-06-1073-020)
(Project No. P2-23}
August 31, 1976
AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS
(71 '4) 962-2'4 I l
"II-1"
II I I -2"
I. SCOPE
It is proposed that the value engineering effort on the
75-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 be phased to include
two analyses; the first to evaluate the major equipment and
processes, and the second to evaluate construction, operation and
maintenance.
These phases will be evaluated separately at different
time intervals during the design phase and will include two value
engineering teams. The two value engineering teams will be
comprised of different individuals and the value engineering team
coordinators will be from different consulting firms.
The Phase 1 analysis will include the evaluation of the
major equipment and the unit processes. This involves the oxygen
facilities, pump station, electrical buildings, aeration facilities,
sedimentation basins, digester cleaning area, and miscellaneous
support facilities. Phase 1 work should begin immediately, and it
is anticipated that Consoer, Townsend and Associates will be
retained to do the analysis.
Consoer, Townsend and Associates was originally submitted
to the Boards of Directors of the Sanitation Districts, along with
John Carollo Engineers and Greeley and Hansen in consideration for
the award of the design contract for the 75-MGD of Improved
Treatment. It is felt that Consoer, Townsend and Associates has
fulfilled the qualification requirements of both the Sanitation
Districts and the State and Environmental Protection Agency to
perform this Phase 1 value engineering analysis.
The Phase 2 analysis will include the evaluation of the
proposed construction scheduling and techniques, and a thorough
review with respect to operation and maintenance. Phase 2 work
will begin in mid-October, 1976 and Mr. Gordon Culp of
Clean Water Consultants will be retained to be the value
engineering team coordinator. The main effort of the evaluation
will be from the Sanitation Districts' staff, however.
""'-" .
AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "II-2"
"II-3"
II. VALUE ENGINEERING TEAM AND QUALIFICATIONS
The Phase 1 value engineering analysis will be performed
by the staff of Consoer, Townsend and Associates. The value
engineering team coordinator will be Mr. Frederick N. Van Kirk
who has had training with EPA. In addition, there will be four
others who have completed the required forty hour course. Two
of those are Mr. Dick Foss, who completed the course at Berkeley
and Mr. Neil Chin, who completed the course at Wisconsin University.
Consoer, Townsend and Associates are presently involved in
value engineering analysis of the treatment facilities in
Indianapolis, Indiana. First the Belmont Plant, which is an
existing 125-MGD secondary plant being upgraded through fixed
film roughing towers, nitrification using cryogenic oxygen, clarifi-
cation, mixed media filters and ozonation. And, secondly, the
Southport Plant, which is an existing 60-MGD secondary plant
which will be upgraded to provide advanced waste treatment for
125-MGD.
Additional staff work will be performed by the San Jose
office of Consoer, Townsend and Associates and will be comprised of
engineers of all disciplines required for the value engineering
analysis. Mr. William Fox, Operational Engineer, will be providing
input for the Sanitation Districts.
The Phase II value engineering analysis will be.coordinated
by Mr. Gordon Culp of Clean Water Consultants, who is a certified
value specialist. Input will be provided by the following
individuals:
1. W. W. Hoagland, Contractor over 40 years, 20 years
experience, Registered Civil Engineer (C5233).
Present project manager on Districts' Job Pl-16.
2. Mark Butier, Contract Superintendent, 20 years
experience, Registered Civil Engineer (Cl2622).
3. Donald Bogart, PE, (Sanitation Districts' staff).
4. Wendell Brooke, Associate Engineer (Sanitation
Districts' staff).
5. Ted Francis, Senior Engineering Associate
(Sanitation Districts' staff).
6. Roy Pendergraft, Senior Facilities Supervisor
(Sanitation Districts' staff).
AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL· DISTRICTS "Il-3"
"11-4"
III. ANALYSIS PLAN
The value analysis of the design of the 75-MGD of
Improved Treatment will be two phased with multiple teams and
review sessions. Phase 1 will begin as soon as authorizatio,n
is granted and Phase 2 in mid-October, 1976.
The Phase 1 value engineering analysis will include the
evaluation of the major equipment and the unit processes.
John Carollo Engineers, the design engineers, have been preparing
design memos for each phase of the project. This includes the
electrical facilities, pump stations, oxygen facilities, aeration
facilities, sedimentation basins, sludge thickeners, digester
cleaning area, and miscellaneous support facilities.
Consoer, Townsend and Associates will initially become
familiar with the existing joint treatment works and the proposed
75-MGD of Improved Treatment. The site will be visited by key
value engineering team members and through meetings with the
Sanitation Districts' staff and John Carollo Engineers, will
become knowledgeable of the design and implementation of the
Sanitation Districts' facilities.
The value engineering teams will examine all of the
documents and design memos relating to the 75-MGD of Improved
Treatment and through interdisciplinary staff support will
evaluate the design considerations. Alternative approaches will
be investigated and where desirable, recommendations for design
alternatives will be made.
The Phase 2 value engineering analysis will include the
evaluation of the construction techniques and scheduling, a
thorough review of operations and manpower requirements, and an
in-depth investigation of the project with respect to on-going
maintenance.
Clean Water Consultants will be the value engineering team
coordinator for the Phase 2 evaluation and the Sanitation Districts'
staff and project management team will provide the evaluative
support. It is felt that, with the combination of many years
experience in construction and operations, that the Sanitation
Districts' personnel can best make the above analysis with
coordination by Clean Water Consultants.
AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "II-4"
::: --I
\J1 --VI.
::z::.
Q
rr1 ::z
t:::J > ---;
rr1
3
~
~
~ ,,......
):> ...._,,.
J>
I
I
t:::1 -(/)
--;
::::0 -CJ --;
(/)
-... --I
~
(
VALUE ENGINEERING SCHEDULE
Subject/Month
Design-Carollo' Engrs.
10% Submittal overall
50% Submittal overall
Final submittal
Value Engineering
Board of Directors'
approval
Phase 1-Consoer,Townsend
Preliminary report
Final Report
Phase 2-Clean Water
Consultants
Preliminary Report
Final Report
Construction
Flood Wall & Site Work
(1073-04)
Oxygen Equipment
(1073-05)
Electrical (1073-06)
Major Facilities
(1073-07)
( (
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 i 4
22 I I .-I I I • I I I I l I
1
\
1,
8
J 8
~
I
l
'
l
I
1?
10 1 AWARD
I ATA
8 12
IATA I AWARD
1
TATA ( AWARD
II JJ II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-175
AlJ'll IOR I ZING NEGOTI ATl O~ AND AWARD OF VALUE
ENGINEERING CONTJfi\(:-·17J{C-75NGo ACTIVATED SLUDGE
TREATMENT FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SAN IT A TI ON DISTRICTS NOS . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ,
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
TIIE SELECTION cmtMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT TO
PROVIDE VALUE ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONJUNCTION
WIIB DESIGN OF 75 MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT
FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 PURSUANT TO
ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES AND AUTHORIZING DISTRICT
NO. 1 TO AWARD SAID CONTRACT
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, have heretofor adopted a policy establishing
procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services;
and,
1~1EREAS, pursuant to said procedures, engineering proposals have been
solicited to provide value engineering services in conjunction with design of 75
MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2.
NOW, 11-IEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, ~
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Selection Committee established pursuant to Districts'
procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services,
is hereby authorized to negotiate an agreement with Consoer Townsend & Associates
to provide value engineering services in conjunction with design of 75 MGD Activated
Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2; and,
Section 2. That upon certification of the final negotiated fee for said
services, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby
authorized to award a contract for said services; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No, 1 are herehy
authorized to execute said contract on behalf of itself and County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #ll(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "JJ"
II KK"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-163
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 1-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI-
TATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RAITT STREET TRUNK
SEWER, FROM SUNFLOWER AVENUE TO MYRTLE STREET, CONTRACT
NO. 1-14
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation,
Districts' engineers, for construction of Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, From
Sunflower Avenue to Myrtle Street, Contract No. 1-14, are hereby approved and
adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., October 5, 1976,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers
be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and,
Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to
award contract for said Contract No. 1-14 on behalf of itself and District No. 7.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #13(n) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 -II KK"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THC RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
·-·-------------·-~------·-
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
P. o. Box 100
Sacramento, CA 95801
(916) lw5-7971
.AUG 2 5 1976
Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Manager
Orange County
Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 97208
In Reply Ref er
to: 510:BS
CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, PROJECT NO. C-06-1373, PLAN OF STUDY APPROVAL
This office has reviewed the Plan of Study, dated June 28, 1976, for the
subject project. The Division of Water Quality, with the concurrence of the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board hereby approves the Plan of
Study, specifically:
1. Study Area and Identification of the Entity or Entities that will be
Involved in Conducting the Planning.
This project will serve the drainage area of Carbon Canyon as delineated
on the submitted map. The sewering agencies within the study area are
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, the City of Brea, and
Chino Basin Municipal Water District.
2. Water Quality Problem or Sewerage Facilities Needs.
"LL-1"
(1) Failing septic systems and the constraint of geological
characteristics which prohibit the successful treatment of
additional wastes by septic systems.
(2) Poorly operating oxidation ponds and spray irrigation system
serving the City of Brea which result in poor effluent quality.
(3) Poorly operating treatment facility serving the Western Hills Golf
and Country Club which results in poor effluent quality.
(4) Non-compliance with Basin Plan total dissolved solids concentration
for discharge to ground water.
AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) DISTRICT 2 "LL-1"
Mr. Ray tewis -2-
Project No. C-06-1373
3. Treatment, Disposal or Project Alternatives to be Considered.
(1) Construction of an interceptor sewer to convey raw waste from
the upper area of Carbon Canyon down Carbon Canyon Creek for
treatment at the OCSD No. 1 treatment plant and subsequent dis-
posal.
(2) Local treatment plants to serve each development and community
with the construction of the OCSD No. 2 Carbon Canyon Dam
Interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam.
(3) Construction of the interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam only and the
upgrading of existing systems within the study area.
(4) Reclamation.
(_5) No Project.
4. Nature and Scope of the Proposed Step 1 Project and Schedule for
Completion of Specific Tasks, such as Project Report (breakdown to
subtasks ok), EIR, Revenue Program, I/I Analysis Special Studies.
TASKS
Project Report
Draft EIR
Final EIR
SCHEDULE
Begin
August 1976
September 1976
January 1977
Complete
January· 1977
January 1977
March 1977
Preparation of the Revenue Program, the survey of cultural resources,
and an I/I analysis should be included in the facilities·scheduling.
Please submit an expanded schedule.
5. Itemized Description of the Estimated Costs for the Project (by tasks).
Project Report
EIR
$37,500
$12,500
The above tasks and subtasks and their estimated costs comprise the eligible
project and are as they will appear in the Step 1 grant offer package. These
costs will serve as the basis for Step 1 project payment. Payment will be
made upon completion and submittal of acceptable Step 1 work.
"LL-2" AGENDA ITEM #22CA)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "LL-2"
·.
Mr. Ray Lewis -3-
Project No. C-06-1373
It should be noted that after the payment request is received by this office,
three to four weeks processing time is required prior to the grantee's
receipt of payment. Due consideration should be made for this time lag and
its effect on cash flow.
The costs outlined above are understood to be estimates, and are regarded as
such by this office. This means that the Plan of Study approval does not
constitute agreement by this office on any exact figures, and that we reserve
the right to question costs to develop the facilities plan (refer to
Section 2141, Limitations to Reasonable Costs, of the California Clean Water
Grant Program Regulations, and to Section 35.935-7, Access, of the Federal
Construction Grant Regulations).
As enabled by Regulation 2133 (c), concerning capacity funding limitations,
the State Board has elected use of the recent Department of Finance popu-
lation projections based on an updated Series E fertility and 0 net in-
migration for service areas in critical air basins and Series D fertility and
100,000 net in-migration for all other projections. These projections will
apply to all Fiscal Year 1976-77 projects. ·
Special attention should be given to development of the project schedule.
Time schedules must be compatible with requirements of any Regional Water
Quality Control Board enforcement actions. Approval of a time schedule not
compatible with Regional Board requirements does not relieve the applicant of
his responsibility to achieve compliance with said requirements.
We consider it essential to meet with each applicant during the preparation
of the facilities plan to help expedite the grant process and to assist in
the development of a project that will comply with all applicable Federal and
State requirements. Meetings will be scheduled by the State evaluator at key
·points during preparation of the facilities plan.
As provided under 40 CFR 35.925-lB(a) (3) a reserve of Step 1 grant assistance
has been requested from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. There-
fore, Plan of Study approval is your authorization to corrrrnence preparation of
the facilities plan discussed herein.
The Carbon Canyon Project is considered a project with the potential for an
EIS to be required because of past local concerns over residential develop-
ment of the area. The alternatives cited in the Plan of Study which will be
considered in the Project Report would not likely increase development
pressures in the upper area of the canyon; thus, an EIS may be avoidable.
"LL-3" AGENDA ITEM #22CA)(l) -DISTRICT 2
'-"'
"LL-3"
t
Mr. Ray Lewis -4-
Project No. C-06-1373
This approval is for the Plan of Study approved herein and does not include
approval of any associated studies to which the Plan of Study may refer.
Four copies of the Project Report, together with four copies of the Project
Report Surnnary form are due in this office by March 1, 1977. Mail to
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, P. O. Box 100,
Sacramento, CA 95801. Should you have any que~tions, please contact
Bill Sukenik, the evaluator assigned to your project, at (916) 322-6576.
f?~-:.-Y Jh_gff.
'~r Larry F. Walker
.'}£ Division Chief
Manager, Clean Water Grant Pr.ogram
cc: CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region 8
Mr. J. Califf, EPA, Region IX
"LL-4" AGENDA ITEM #22CA)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "LL-4"
lHE IRVINE COMPANY
September 1, 1976
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
-----5~i0 Nr:wport Center Drive
Newport l3cacll, California 92663
(714) 644-3011
Subject: Annexation No. 7 -Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
Gentlemen:
The Irvine Company hereby requests that Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
(OCSD 5) annex approximately 3,430 acres (see attached precise boundary plat and
legal description) of territory in its coastal area adjacent to the existing boundary
of the District.
The property described on the· attached plat has no resident inhabitants 'and The
Irvine Company is sole ovmer of the entire area. Also attached is a listing of the
assessed value of each separate parcel of land within the territory.
The Irvine coastal community has a certified Environmental Impact Report prepared
per Public Resources Code 21000 et seq. and the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act. The County of Orange served as the lead agency~·
pursuant to Section 15065 of the State Guidelines and OCSD 5 was consulted as a
responsible agency per Section 15066 of the State Guidelines. The Irvine Company
suggests that pursuant to Section 15064 of the State Guidelines, the lead agency
EIR is appropriate to serve as the EIR for OCSD 5 determinations on the underlying
project which is the orderly development of the coastal plan. In this regard,
attached is the Notice of Determination for the above-mentioned EIR.
In order to meet LAFCO timing requirements and preserve the opportunity for agendiz-
ing the annexation proceedings for their regular September 22 meeting, The Irvine
Company submitted the attached letter of application for annexation dated August 27.
The letter references the OCSD 5 hearing on September 8 and states that proposed
terms and conditions are to be established at this hearing. It further states that
as the sole property mmer, The Irvine Company grants permission to forego notice in
hearing and requests approval that LAFCO proceed without notice and hearing and
authorize OCSD 5 to proceed similarly. Enclosed with the letter was a check for ·
$300 to cover LAFCO processing fees.
Enclosed with this letter are a check for $325 to cover District processing costs
and a check for $525 to cover the State Board of Equalization processing fee. The
State Board fee is based on last fiscal year's fee structure and will be adjusted
when the fees effective July 1, 1976 have been computed.
"MM-1" AGENDA ITEM #24(A) -DISTRICT 5 "MM-:1"
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5
Page 2
September 2, 1976
As recommended by staff and supported by the OCSD 5 Board of Directors, it is under-
stood and acceptable to The Irvine Company as property owner that annexation fees of
$1,394/acre be paid to the District for 1,535 acres of land, which reflects the amount
of land within the area of annexation designated for urban use on The Irvine Company's
proposed land use plan {copy attached) . It is understood that The Irvine Company or
its assigns will then be given a credit by OCSD 5 for 1,535 acres of land upon which
it will not be held liable for annexation fees as development occurs in the future.
The procedure under which this credit account would operate is to be worked out in
detail with the respective staffs prior to the order of annexation.
It is further understood that in the event land area in excess of 1,535 acres should
'be converted to urban use and the changed land use does contribute to the sewer
system, then the area would be subject to the appropriate annexation fees enforce-
able at the time of development. A deter~ination of whether annexation fees should
or should not be charged on public open space will be made at the time of change to
public ownership or when service is requested by a public entity.
As agreed with staff, a letter of credit in the amount of $2,139,790 is enclosed to
provide guarantee of payment for the 1,535 acres of urban use, based on the rate of
$1,394/acre.
Your support of this annexation request is respectfully requested .
.._.,. Sincerely,
::i'!:=-.. c:----,,..._-:::;;r--~ "IO;.c:~--~-:::> -?Q C2.A:P
Richard A. Reese
Vice President
Planning Department
.ST/GBJ: lab
Enclosures
cc: ~tr. Fred Harper, OCSD 5
Mr. Bill Hurst, IRWD
Mr. Ray Lewis, OCSD 5
--
"MN-2" AGENDA ITEM #24(A) -DISTRICT 5 "MM-2"
LAW or nc cs or
SUITE: 1020
.JAMf"S G. JC<Ou~><C:
T>10M•S 1..wOOORuFF"
S.COTT C NICHOLS
CALIF"O~NIA l'"l~ST ElANK BUILDING
Al::q:A CODC ''"
635 • C:.ZIZ
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
Honorable chairman and Board
of Directors
county Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain valley, ca. 92708
August 25, 1976
Re: Proposed Annexation No. 51--
0range Park Acres
Honorable Chairman and Board of Directors:
As a result of the proceedings undertaken by the Board of
Directors at its last regular meeting of August 11, 1976, I
wish to point out to you the remaining p~ocedural, legal and
administrative matters that must be considered by the Board of
Directors in order to finally culminate the annexation and the
development of the sewer system in the subject area.
1. At the request of the Directors, the next meeting will
be held in the Orange Park Acres vicinity in order to attempt to
obtain the highest possible cormnunity interest by attendance at
that meeting. This meeting should be designed for two purposes--
namely, (a) providing the full explanation of the engineering
design and the projected cost to the residents of the area and re-
ceiving their co111.mcntary tlwreon; and (b) to satisfy the legal
requirements relative to the formation of an improvement district,
including the proposed acquisition and improvement in the amount
of indebtedness to be incurred. The legal requirements are to
give written notice to every property owner within the proposed
annexation/improvement district territory; and therefore, the
neighborhood meeting notice can satisfy both purposes as noted
above.
2. In accordance with the prior action of the Board of
Directors, the Orange Park Acres Association, acting as proponents
of the proposed annexation, have paid the District approximately
$9,.300.00 to defray all expenses incurred by the District for
"Nr·~-1" AGENDA ITEM. #27(A) -DISTRICT 7 "NN:-1"
Honorable Chairman and Board
of Directors
county Sanitation District No. 7
Page TWO
August 25, 1976
engineering, administrative and legal expenses to date. As of
this date, the District has expended approximately $7,000.00, and
no portion thereof has been paid to special legal counsel. rt
does include the legal fees incurred by the District for services
rendered by this office relative to the entire proceedings.
3. We have advised the proponents that approximately $3,000.00
in additional funds will need to be deposited by the District
prior to taking any further action, including the hearings on
the.proposed improvement district and annexation. This will be
used to off-set expenses to be incurred for the notices, the
application for processfng fees at the L.A.F.C., and those fees
of special legal counsel for bond purposes, together with the
in-house cost for engineering, administration and legal.
4. The District Directors have previously authorized the
General Manager to retain special bond counsel at such time as
deemed appropriate. rt is the opinion and recorrunendation of both
Mr .. Harper and myself that at such time as the additional monies
are deposited by the proponents and the hearing is set for con-
sideration of the improvement district, special counsel should be
retained to assist this office and the District in formulating
the precise requirements of conducting the bond election and the
formulating of bond counsel opinion relative thereto. It is the
recommendation that the law offices of Wilson, Jones, Morton &
Lynch be retained for this purpose on a fee basis of a flat sum
of $2,500.00 for all services required up to and including the
election; and in the event of a successful passage of the bond
issue, that the fee schedule be in accordance with the approved
percentage scale based upon the value of the bonds actually sold.
5. It should be pointed out that if proceedings continue
foiward, and the annexation election is held with the result of
approvcil by the voters in the District, that sufficient funds
will be generated from the bond proceeds to construct the main
trunk sewer known as Reaches 17 and 18 of the Master Plan of
Trunk Sewers for the District. These funds will not be sufficient
to acqui.re any subtrunks or local collector sewers. •rhose fa-
cilities would necessarily have to be constructed with either
developer contributions or other special assessment districts in
the irrunediate vicinity where the additional sewer line is to be
installed.
"NN-2" AGENDA ITEM #27(A) -DISTRICT 7 "NN-2"
Honorable Chairman and Board
of Directors
County S0nitation District No. 7
Page Three
August 25, 1976
6. Upon a successful election and sale of the bonds, it
would appear that the District would have an obligation to
inunediately embark upon the securing of the trunk system as
proposed in the program. This could be accomplished by any of
the three following methods:
a. A negotiated acquisition of the trunk sewer
presently installed and owned by the City of Orange
which meets District specifications;
b. Acquisition of the City of orange sewer line by
condemnation proceedings in the event of an unsuccessful
negotiated acquisition; and
c. The construction of a trunk sewer by the Sani-
tation District t11at would be in aligmnent nearly
parallel with the existing City of orange line.
If any of the Directors have any specific inquiries concerning
the future processing of this app.lication, I would ask that you 'Wf
feel free to contact this office, as well as that of the General
Manager and Chief Engineer ..
TLW:pj
cc: Mr. Fred A. Harper
Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Very truly yours,
/CJ?:Jt~-
Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
"NN-3" AGENDA ITEM #27CA) -DISTRICT 7 "NN-3"
"00"
RESOLUTION NO. 75-169-5
AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO A\\'ARD CONTRACT NO. 5-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGe COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR
BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-20, UPON RECEIPT
OF APPROVAL FROM CALIFORNIA COASTAL CONSERVATION
COMMISSION
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·* *
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 76-122-5,
approving plans and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side), Contract
No. 5-20; and,
WHEREAS, said resolution authorizes bids to be received and opened for said
project on a date to be determined by the General Manager; and,
WHEREAS, said project must be completed prior to December, 1976, and time
is, therefore, of the essenc~; and,
WHEREAS, said project must be approved by the California Coastal Conservation
Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That following receipt of bids for Back Bay 'Trunk Sewer (East
Side), Contract No. 5-20, the General Manager be authorized to establish the
effective award date for said contract and to award same to the lowest responsible
bidder for an amount not to exceed $275,000.00, upon approval from the California
Coastal Conservation Commission; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be and are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with the awardee
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents
therefor; and,
Section 3. That all other bids received for said work be rejected and that
all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(BB) -DISTRICT 5 II 00".
-
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS
August 31, 1976
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
.. . .
FUEL A "-1 0 OIL-
, ~~~':"_:A_,u_r-_D~.., I I I·
__ -__Bl11LDIN6 -...__....._...__.
DROP P 1i>1 NG-
DEL JV t:12.r D
JO
D?IVt:S F"O~
C OLLECT/Dl'J S'/STE"
SET. FLIGHT C HAIN
,., -
BEtl-iG Pt.ACED CJ
S PZ CX:: !CCTS, ·
le
rJ
I . I
9 B 1 ' 5 4 :5
I
2 I
4 3 . 6 5
8 '1
10 9
12 II
14 13
1EtONDARY CL ARIF/EKS
'Z I
,.: .
D/6E5TE~f
PJPIAIG /IJ$71Jj.j.l:.-
7"/()I'./ c:1> N T/ N!J £
9
AERATION BASIN1
()()(} ?!P I NG 1NS TAL.LA T 1oiJ. c:=:=i CC> 1'.JTJ >JUC:.S · .
W.A~rE ~LU06E
Tfll,J(ENE~S
... •
D POWEK 8UIJ.DIAIG
50 _MG D ACTIVA.TED SLUDGE PLANT
CONTRACT NO. P1 -.16
,.
. ~
l l : ~
C.0.NTRACT .NO .. P1 -1.6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27' 1974
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29,876,000.00
PAID TO DATE: $26, 497, 896. 67
Contract is for the construction of Activated
Sludge secondary treatment faailities at Plant No.
l. The new faailities UJil'i aid the Districts in
meeting rrrzndated State and Federal ocean disch.arge
requirements.
1/hen co71pleted, tr.e secondary treatment system
tM.ZZ process the 50 mgd of wastewater flolJJing
through Plant No. l. The effluent will then bZend
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days
. PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977
Lrith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaZ Z booster
station, improving the overalZ quality of water
pwnped through the outfall system into the ocean.
Significant structures included in the contra.ct
are the B"lower Building, Aeration Basins, Second-
ary Cla.rifiers, i:A.Jo Digesters, Waste SZudge Thick-
eners and the Power Building.
. ACTIVITIES DUR ING THE PAST MONTH
Work continues at a slow pace.
In the Blower Building the engines have been set and leveled.
The gears and blowers have not· been set. Some fresh air vent-
ilation system fans and ducting are being installed.
The Aeration Basin drop piping has ·been delivered but is not yet
being installed.
The sludge collection system drives have been set on the secondary
clarifiers. The flight chains are being put onto the sprockets.
The pressurization pumps are being set in the Waste Sludge
Thickeners.
Piping installation continues in the Digester control room
and in the area tunnels.
>
·.
LAKE
Q\$1.2
---co~LETE
TO BE c01~sTRucTED ----
.. . ,.,,, '\
•• '4.. ••
• I .. • .
:· ~ ·= ., ---. :· ....... .: .: er .. .. ...
• # .. .. .. .. .
CONTRACT 2 -14 -3
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER 6 SOUTH SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Oct. 15, 1975
$3,814,462.00
$1,543,533.00
Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125
mite reinf oI'Ced concrete pipe trunk Zine sewer a-
long La. Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Irr.periaZ HUJy.
i.n Anaheim.
fizc first one-third of tr.e project uses 51" diam-
eter pipe, the bal.ance is 48".
Also included in the contract is a Zaterol con-
nectoP Zirle to the Santa Ana River In teroeptor
system from JOO' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a-
long Imperial. H!JJY. to La. PaZma Ave. This 2750'
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12' 1976
section of 33n diameter vitrified clay pipe is
designed to receive fZo~s from the South Rz:ver
Trunk, serving Santa Ana Canyor.. With the comp le-
tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa Ana Can-
yon· pwrrping statwn can be abandoned.
This sectwn of the interceptor cystem is designed
to handle up to 35 miHion gallons flow per dazJ.
Included in this figw.'e is 30 /.JGD allowance for
accepting future high brine wasteu.'ater flOl.Js from
San Bernazadino and Riverside Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
·Pipe laying was halted on La Palma Avenue after crossing the Lakeview
intersection. Work progressed slow in this area ·due to numerous
interferring utilities, limited working area, and heavy traffic.
Traffic flow was sl~edconsiderable, but constant control was main-
tained. In total, only 153. feet of pipe was laid on La Palma.
Clean-up and base paving continued along the back portion of La Palma
Avenue. · Base paving reaced the Lakeview intersection.
After shutting down on La Palma, work began on the .Santa Ana River
crossing near La Palma and Imperial Highway. After diverting the
river, successful dewatering was accomplished. The Contractor laid
262 feet of 33" v.c.p., encased in reinforced concrete.
When-work is-resumed on La Palma, progress should improve due to better
working conditions. Job should be completed in late November.
DIST. 2
tr a COMPLETE
----To BE CONS'fRUCTED
./:40"100 ST,
er~ SPRlllJG ST.
CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4
PRIVATE RO.
CONTRACT 2-14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH S
Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: October 15, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $ 4, 24 0, 95 7. 00
PAID TO DATE: $4, 254, 641. 50
Contract is for construction of a S.1 mile long
section of reinforced concrete pipe trunk Zine
sewez' from Imperial, l!z,Jy. along La Palma Aveo in
J.na.heim, traversing the new Yorba Regional PCII'k to
'1eir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosses the
Santa Ana River at iAi.10 places as it traverses
county territory through Santa Ana Valley Irriga-
tion Co. and. Bryant Ranch properties to Gypswn Rd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: January 7' 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 14 Calendar Days
PROJECTED CO~tPLETI ON DATE: January 21, 19 7 7
Depending on design criteria, various sections of
this Zine use 42, 45 and 51 inch diarneter pipe.
This section LJit:l handle flows up to 32 miHion
gallons per dayo Ir.eluded in this figure is 30
MGD aZZowance for accepting future high brine
wastewater flOUJs from San Berna.rdi1!0 and Rivereide
Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
All construction has been completed. c+ean-up and minor repairs
have followed in preparation for the final inspection. It is
expected that acceptance will be recommended at the September Board
Meeting.
\.
. DIST. 2
----
CONTRACT No.
2-14-5
· .
-J:
0
I-
~
GYPS UN\
CANYON RO.
SANTA ANA
CANYON RD.
CONTRACT 2-i4-5
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
REACHES 6, 7 & 8
S. S. Zarubica,· Contractor
. STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
. PAID TO DATE:
November 27, 1975
$2,096,676.15
$1,110,890.85
Contract ia for the construction of a 2. 4 mile
'Zeng section of reinforced cor.crete pipe Zine sew-
er. The line goes through the Santa Ar.a Car.yon
from ~here Contra.ct No. 2-14-4 er.ds in ahout the
center of the Bryant Rc:nch property, along the
route of the Santa Ana River and throw;h the
northern portion of the Green River Golf Course to
the County Line. The "Line terminates in a cor.troZ
and metering structure desi~ed to measure flows
from the upper basin counties.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Sept. 21, ·19 76
0 Calendar Days
Sept. 21, 1976
The Zirze consists of 45, 42, and 39-inch diameter
sections of pipe. The diarr;eters ch.ar.ge in rela-
tion to design r,;quirerr:ents. This eection of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor system wiZZ handle
flows of approxir.ateZy 32 miZZion gaZZor.s per day.
Included in this figure is 30 /.:GD aZZOUJar.ce for
accepting future high brine wastei.i;ater floli)s frcm
San Bernardino and Riverside Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
..._.,. .·
Wo~k continues slow on this project, partly due to large amounts of
ground water, making excavation difficult. Th~ Contractor reached
the lower river crossi.ng and laid 300 feet of 42" "v.c .p. fully
encased in reinforced concrete.
It is expected that the job will be completed by the end of November.
7-N
R.£ Plll~E.D LEAK. ___ _,
DIST. 2
----• 'IO f£ CG~'RUCITD
CONTRACT No. 2-16-2
CONTRACT 2.-16-2
YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN., FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO
KRAEMER BOULEVARD
Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: January 29, 19,76
ORlbINAL CONTRACT: $660,287.98
PAID TO DATE: $ 6 4 2 , 51 7 . 6 6
Contract is for cons~tion of a 1. 4 miZe sewer
force main of 30-inch ductile iron pipe. This
line will carry SeLJage pto7iped from the Yorba Linda
Pw;p Station at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associ-
ated Road in Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana
Ri.ver Trunk line system at Palm Drive and Kroemer
BouZeva:rd in Placentia.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
July 26, 1976
30 Calendar Days
August 26, 1976
This force Train and the pwr.p station are dC'signed
to reZieve the presently congested Newhcpe-PZccen-
tia Trunk Line. It lJJi Zl serve proposed Zand use
development of the tributary area tu the year> 2010.
The force main is designed to accept up to 15 miZ-
Zion gallons per d.ay flows.
ACTIVITIES .DURING THE PAST MONTH
Nearly all pipe is in the ground, but the line has not passed a
pressure test. The line has been pumped to_the required 150 psi,
but leakage is far greater than allowed. Two leaks have been found
and repaired. One was at the corner of Palm Drive and Sapphire
Road. The other was a dresse-r. coupling at the Yorba Linda Pump
Station, which was installed under Contract 2-15. However, other
unlocated leaks must exist as the line still won't meet the test
requiremen~s.
The contractor will continue to search for the leak or leaks.
Close out will occur soon after a successful test.
·.
I ·, , ..
I .
J l~LIM~COl.N -______.____..__AV.£. _, L
L1Mns ot=
~11 A 1J b ) 0 11
SEVJE
TO BE t<EPA1k!E.b n
1:
DIST. 3.
--COMPLETE
~
~·
~
~ .~
llll --TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CITY OF
Bl/ENA
PARK
CERRITOS
CITY
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
CITY OP
ANAJ-IEIM
OLIA/DA
AVE.
N
..
j .
ROAD
.i
~
f4
J .... 0
~tl
~1 l ~
AVE. :1
!'
~.
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: March 6' 19 75
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00
PA I D TO DATE: $ 3 , 911 , 4 0 7 • 5 0
Contract is for installation of a Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer Zine from a point 1200
feet south of Kate Zla Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to LincoZn Avenue
in· Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame-
ters al'1e 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for
6, 900 feet and 66" for the remaining 1200 feet of
the project. Flows from this reach wiU drain in-
to Contract 3-20-1 to the south.
This proj eat is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
relief system designed to reZieve the presently
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: . .
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
March 6, 1976
0 Calendar Days
March 6, 1976
congested MiZZer-HoZder Trunk Sewer by intercep-
ting flows from the r.orthwest portion of District
3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and Ellis Avenue
in Fountain Valley. It wi7:l eventuaily extend to
Imperial Avenue in La Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
handle a fZow of 68 million gaUons per day arid
?Vi.ZZ serve the proposed developed land use pl.an in
the tributar;:1 area to the yeal'1 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Cleaning and TV inspection of the 10" and 8" VCP sewer line
was completed between Lincoln and Ball. The results show sags in
nearly the entire line. In addition, about ten cracks or offset
joints were observed. Infiltration was evident in a number of
these.
The contractor has been ordered to make the necessary repairs.
He responded by denying responsibility for the defects observed
and stated additional compensation would be required for them to
remedy the situation.
Talks are continuing.
CRE SC.ENT AVE.
AREA or TEL£"PHoNE
C/\ BL£ l NTEkf E .kE.NCE:
CAR80N CREEK C 1-1.ANNtL
':. ~-~ =··=·'··=·--·=: ===-.. -=,~~.--=· ... ·=-.. =.'--;j --
-u,.., _M_A_R_l_O_N ___ l ..__1 _A_V_E' -
--nL-C_~_R_R_l_T_O_.;..S _ ___, ~
-·ExERC.tSE --,...1---------
TRAC K~---,l~-,,r-STABLE&
l ...... 111 ___ I
DIST. 3
COMPLETE
----TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No.
3-21-2
---a S.P.R.R.
_ JJWUll~)!!!l !II iii i I 1111 i I l I I I !I l:l:illlilllll
ARROWHEAD ~:
MFG. CO. I I
11 A _____
1
J .~ATELL. AVE.
CONTRACT 3-21-2
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29
B & P Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: April 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,177,745.00
PAID TO DATE: $ 417,189.00
Contract is for construction of a 2. ?5 mite sec-
tion of vitrified clay pipe trunk line sewer
through the City of Cijpress from Y.ateUa Avenue in
Los A"lamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De.-
pending on design critieria, the pipe line is in
. various sizes from 15" to 30" in diameter.
This section of line will complete the m::zster-
planned Westside Re lief Interceptor sewer that be-
gins at the Seal Beach Blvd. Pumping Station at
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' 1976
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' 19 7 6
Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. This system
is designed to relieve the Los A lc.mitos Su!Jfr:irik,
which at present functions as the m:::zin sewer for
the westside basin. For the most pa:r't, this line
is C1.A.1Tentiy flo..Jing at or near peak capacn:ty •
2'his section is designed to handle flol.Js up to
6.32 million gallons per day and will serve prc-
posed Zand use plans in the tributari;:J to the year
2010. .
· ACTIVITIE~ DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work has slowed on Orange Avenue due to .interferring utility. The
close proximity of a 10" sewer required. shoring of the excavated
near Julie Beth Street. In addition, a telephone cable was 7 feet
closer to the 21" v.c.p. sewer than indicated on the plans, requiring
shoring along the last portion· of Orange Avenue. Where this shoring
is required, only 30' to 50' of pipe is laid daily. Contractor
laid 2,194' of pipe during August.
Clean-up and base paving is complete on Denni Street. Base paving
on Orange Street is approaching Moody Street.
Ae.esss ~CAD
ACR.C>GG ~CEVG no"PE!ay
BONO AVE_. -t.'
DIST. 7
----
CONTRACT NO.
7-6-9
WALN.UT
SPR \NG
. t-
CJ)
(/)
w
$
UJ
CHAPMAN :r
AVE.
ST.
AVE.
c·
~·
._ ~
z
<[.
U)
o. C. F. C:. O. === ======~=
~=====-==-============= ----II
CONTRACT 7-6-9
TUSTI N-ORArJGE TRUNK SEWER
PORTION OF REACH 14 AUD REACHES 15 AND 16
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
April 29, 1976
$295,826.40
$288,429.40
rhis contract is tJie last reach of ·the rrt:lster-
planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer to be construc-
ted by the District. It consists of a 1. 5 mile
section of vitrified clay pipe line vaPying from
· 18 to 21 inches in diameter.
Construation tJill begin at Santiago Boulevard and
Spring Street in Orange and go north to Santiago
Canyon Road, where the project ends. The l.ine
traverses portions of the City of Grange an.d un-
incorpomted County area a"long its route.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 29, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct• 29, 1976
This portion of the trunk sewer will connect into
an e:r:isting 18" sewe!' line naJ owned by the Ci t;y
of Orange. The upstr·e~ system feeding to this
point is scheduled to be purcr.ased by the District
at a later date.
Designed flow for this portion of the trunk line
system is 4.65 MGD, and wi"l"l serve the _proposed
developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to
the year· 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Fina~ paving has been completed. A 12 feet wide road across the
Reeve Property at Hewes Street and Villa Park Road has also been
graded and paved.
Recommendation for acceptance expe.cted at September Board meeting.
~
SUMMARY
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During August
Total Work out to Bid
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During August
Total Work Awaiting Award
$31,243,463
27,845,181
200' 817
27,000
$17,583,869
12,634,108
350,000
0
Total Amount Under Contract,
Awaiting Award and Out to Bid
$31,243,463
27,000
$17,583,869
$48,854,332
'
..
. ,'
I
! .(
(.PRO Pe>':>E.D)
GJ-11 ~ I~ I LL '"'J
b.IR.PofZ-T ·----
~
.~
. .
~ ..
''::l &~ :
I
. {
.(
(PRO Po~e.o)
GJ-l 1 tJc? 1-l t LL~
b..H~.Pol2-T ·---
(
L
-~ ....
I
I ,(
(PRO Po~e.O)
c.1-i t t-.Jc:7 l-l 1 LL~..:>-
ti.1 R. Po !2-T ·---
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Agenda Item Ne KJ+}
CHANGE ORDER
:ONTRACTOR: ____ R_e_w_e_s_-_sc_h_o~c~k_.__J_V ________________________ _
C.O. N0·~-=2:..---~--------------~
DATE Augyst 26. I 976
108: MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK, CONTR ACT NO . 11-!R-l
Amount of this Change Order {)OH)) (DEDUCT) $ (731.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
:ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Adjustment of Quantities:
Delete Item 15 . At the time of
unable to obtain access to this
requirement for an encroachment
this manhole would need repair.
repair. Deduct ($731 . 00)
Original Contract Date
Original Contract T i me
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this C.O.
Total Time E x~ension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Complet i on Date
Board authorization date: September 8, 1976
By~----------------------------------Con tractor
design of this project, Districts was
manhole due to Department of Transportation
permit. It was assumed at that time that
It was later found that it did not need
March 25, 1976
120 Calendar Days
July 23 , 1976
39 Calendar Days
39 Calendar Da y s
159 Calendar Days
August 31, 1976
Qrlginal Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change c~~w (DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
Approved:
.. .$ 37,253.00
. $ (1, 140.00)
$ . (731. QO)
$ 35.382.00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By __ ~----------------~~~~~--~ Chief Eng i ne er
JOINT CHAIRMAN
9-8-76
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.~ WEDNESDAY
SEPTEMBER 22ND. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND
AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS.
HOLT
MEYER
OLSON
PATTINSON
REPORT ON THE ANNUAL CASA MEETING IN SAN DIEGO. YOU MAY WISH TO
CALL ON DIRECTOR BARRETT FOR HIS COMMENTS.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 24
IUH\E lt\\f 11 \l\TEH UISTlllll P.O. Box D·I • 4201 Campus Drive• Irvine, Calif. 92716 • (714) 833-1223
September 8, 1976
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain VAlley, CA 92708
Subject: Proposed OCSD No. 5 Irvine Coastal Area Annexation
Gentlemen:
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 has filed for the annexation of
an additional 3,411 acres of Irvine coastal area in accordance with your
approved Master Plan. This area is presently within the boundaries of
the Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement District Nos. 104 and 204.
Engineering studies prepared for ·IRWD indicate that the best sewage
disposal solution of several alternatives for this area is to ann~x to
OCSD No. 5. This solution will have the least environmental impact, is
the least energy intensive and is the most cost effective for the ultimate
taxpayer and resident of all possible alternatives.
In the event the property did not develop as unincorporated territory,
the District entered into an agreement dated September 11, 1972 and
amended September 2, 1973, with the City of Newport Beach relative to
possible future adjustment of service area boundaries. This agreement
provides for the conveyance of certain water and sewer facilities, to-
gether with service and bond obligations to the City if or when an
·annexation should occur, including applicable detachment proceedings.
The Ir.vine Ranch Water District supports the annexation of 3,411 acres
to Orange County Sanitation District No. 5. If further information is
desired, we will be happy to supply it, relative to the terms and
conditions of the proposed annexation.
Sijc, ',Tely yours,,,·~
ft ( / ~ /,/'; ,/ /.,, ~ ,· .
(. L-<-~!~Ir(_.; l;.((:~ ... ~
W,.(lliam F. Hurst · _,
fienera 1 Manager
-.
I
!
··~
(,~ :
.(
(Pro Po~e.D)
~I~ 1-)1LL"?
A.IP-Pof2-T ·----
~
Cl> ;:,
c..
Q)
et
3
~ . \~
. .
=
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 -7:30 'P.M.
ALL DISTRICTS
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(12) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-162, to receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall
Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, to Skipper & Company in the
amount of $341,791.00. See pages "A" and "B"
DISTRICT 2
(22) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items:
(a) Consideration of items relative to engagement of firm for
preparation of Feasibility Report regarding sewerage service
for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area: ·
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter
dated August 25, 1976, from the State Water Resources
Control Board approving the plan of study re Sleepy
Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area. See page "C"
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Selection
Committee certification re final negotiated fee with
Engineering-Science, Inc. for said services. See
page "D"
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-164-2, approving award
of contract to Engineering-Science, Inc . for preparation
of Feas ibility Report re sewerage service for S leepy
Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area, in form app roved by
the General Couns e l , for a maximum fee not to exceed
$ 33, 000. 00. See page "E"
II A"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-162
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. J-6-lD
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CO NTRACT FOR
INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT
OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lD
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer that award of contract be
made to Skipper & Company for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at
Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No . J-6-lD, and the bid tabulation and proposal
for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Job No. J-6-10 be awarded to
Skipper & Company in the total ·amount of $341, 791.00,. in accordance with the
terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of D ~stricts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into and s ign a contra ct with said contractor for said work
pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and c ontract documents therefor,
in form approve d by the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are here by rejected
and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, .1976.
AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS II A"
"B"
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -$300,000
BID TABULATION
SHEET
Da. te September 7, 1976
Contract For: INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES
AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION
1.
2.
JOB NO." J-6-10
CONTRACTOR
Skipper & Company
Midway City
James E. Hoagland Company
Long Beach
F. T. Ziebarth Company
Fullerton
4. Taymech Corporation
Santa Ana
· 5. r-:argate Construction, Inc.
Carson
6. Pylon, Inc.
Long Beach
7. Triad Mechanical, Inc.
Stanton
8.
9.
10.
AGENDA ITEM #12CA) -ALL DISTRICTS
TOTAL BID
. $341, 791. 00
. $356,400.00
. $365,400.00
$367,987.00
$397, 450. ·oo
·$419,822.00
$457,950.00
•
"B II
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Gov..rnor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
P. O. Box 100
Sacramento, CA 95801
(916) 445-7971
.AUG 2 5 1976 In Reply Ref er
to: 510:BS
Mr. Ray Lewis
Chief Manager
Orange County
Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 97208
CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR, PROJECT NO. C-06-1373, PLAN OF STUDY APPROVAL
This office has reviewed the Plan of Study, dated June 28, 1976, for the
subject project. The Division of Water Quality, with the concurrence of the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board hereby approves the Plan of
Study, specifically:
1. Study Area and Identification of the Entity or Entities that will be
Involved in Conducting the Planning.
This project will serve the drainage area of Carbon Canyon as delineated
on the submitted map. The sewering agencies within the study area are
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, the City of Brea, and
Chino Basin Municipal Water District.
2. Water Quality Problem or Sewerage Facilities Needs.
"C-1"
(1) Failing septic systems and the constraint of geological
characteristics which prohibit the successful treatment of
additional wastes by septic systems.
(2) Poorly operating oxidation ponds and spray irrigation system
serving the City of Brea which result in poor effluent quality.
(3) Poorly operating treatment facility serving the Western Hills Golf
-and Country Club which results in poor effluent quality.
·(4) Non-compliance with Basin Plan total dissolved solids concentration
for discharge to ground water.
AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2
~ ~
"C-1"
Mr. Ray Lewis -2-
Project No. C-06-1373
3. Treatment, Disposal or Project Alternatives to be Considered.
(1) Construction of an interceptor sewer to convey raw waste from
the upper area of Carbon Canyon down Carbon Canyon Creek for
treatment at the OCSD No. 1 treatment plant and subsequent dis-
posal.
(2) Local treatment plants to serve each development and community
with the construction of the OCSD No. 2 Carbon Canyon Dam
Interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam.
(3) Construction of the interceptor to Carbon Canyon Dam only and the
upgrading of existing systems within the study area.
(4) Reclamation.
(5) · No Project.
4. Nature and Scope of the Proposed Step 1 Project and Schedule for
Completion of Specific Tasks, such as Project Report (breakdown to
subtasks ok), EIR, Revenue Program, I/I Analysis Special Studies.
TASKS
Project Report
Draft EIR
Final EIR
SCHEDULE
Begin
August 1976
September 1976
January 19 77
Complete
January 1977
January 19 77
March 1977
Preparation of the Revenue Program, the survey of cultural resources,
and an I/I analysis should be included in the facilities scheduling.
Please submit an expanded schedule.
5. Itemized Description of the Estimated Costs for the Project (by tasks).
Project Report
EIR
$37,500
$12,SOll
The above tasks and subtasks and their estimated costs comprise the eligible
project and are as they will appear in the Step 1 grant offer package. These
costs will serve as the basis for Step 1 project payment. Payment will be
made upon completion and submittal of acceptable Step 1 work.
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "C-2"
Mr. Ray Lewis -3-
Project No. C-06-1373
It should be noted that after the payment request is received by this office,
three to four weeks processing time is required prior to the grantee's
receipt of payment. Due consideration should be made for this time lag and
its effect on cash flow.
The costs outlined above are understood to be estimates, and are regarded as
such by this office. This means that the Plan of Study approval does not
constitute agreement by this office on any exact figures, and that we reserve
the right t.o question costs to develop the facilities plan (refer to
Section 2141, Limitations to Reasonable Costs, of the California Clean Water
Grant Program Regulations, and to Section 35.935-7, Access, of the Federal
Construction Grant Regulations).
As enabled by Regulation 2133 ·(c), concerning capacity funding limitations,
the State Board has elected use of the recent Department of Finance popu-
lation projections based on an updated Series E fertility and 0 net in-
migration for service areas in critical air basins and Series D fertility and
100,000 net in-migration for all other projections. These projections will
apply to all Fis.cal Year 19 76-77 projects.
Special attention should be given to development of the project schedule.
Time schedules must be compatible with req~irements of any Regional Water
Quality Control Board enforcement actions. Approv·a1 of a time schedule not
compatible with Regional Board requirements does not relieve the applicant of
his responsibility to achieve compliance with said requirements.
We consider it essential to meet with each applicant during the preparation
of the facilities plan to help expedite the grant process and to assist in
the development of a project that will comply with all applicable Federal and
State requirements. Meetings will be scheduled by the State evaluator at key
.points duri_ng preparation of the facilities plan.
As provided under 40 CFR 35.925-lB(a) (3) a reserve of Step 1 grant assistance
has been requested from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. There-
fore, Plan of Study approval is your authorization to connnence preparation of
the facilities plan discussed herein.
The Carbon Canyon Project is considered a project with the potential for an
EIS to be required because of past local concerns over residential develop-
ment of the area. The alternatives cited in the Plan of Study which will be
considered in the Project Report would not likely increase development
pressures in the upper area of the· canyon; thus, an EIS may be avoidable.
"C-3" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "C-3"
Mr. Ray Lewis ~4-
Project No. C-06-1373
This approval is for the Plan of Study approved herein and does not include
approval of any associated studies to which the Plan of Study may refer.
Four copies of the Project Report, together with four copies of the Project
Report Sunnnary form are due in this office by March 1, 1977. Mail to
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, P. 0. Box 100,
Sacramento, CA 95801. Should you have any questions, please contact
Bill Sukenik, the evaluator assigned to your project, at (916) 322-6576.
~J~~
~r Larry F. Walker
1 Division Chief
"C-4"
Manager, Clean Water Grant P~ogram
cc: CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region 8
Mr. J. Califf, EPA, Region IX
AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "C-4"
"D"
CoU.NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 2
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
September 8, 1976
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in
Connection with Feasibility Report te Sewerage Service for
Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canr.on Drainage Area
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following
fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for engineering services in connection
with preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for Sleepy Hollow-
Carbon Canyon drainage area:
Actual direct labor costs
Plus actual eligible overhead (presently estimated at 135%)
applied to direct labor costs
Plus actual direct expenses
Total above fees not to exceed $33,000.00
The Selection Cornmi tte~ hereby certifies the .above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed, and that said fee will not result
in excessive profits for the consultant.
Approved: /s/ Fred A. Harper
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
/s/ Henry W. Wedaa
Henry W. Wedaa
Chairman, Selection Committee
AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "D"
-.
RESOLUTION NO. 76-164-2
APPROVING AWARD OF ENGINEERING CONTRACT FOR
PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY. REPORT RE SEWERAGE
SERVICE FOR SLEEPY HOLLOW-CARBON CANYON
DRAINAGE AREA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AWARD OF
ENGINEERING CONTRACT FOR PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT RE SEWERAGE SERVICE FOR
SLEEPY HOLLOW-CARBON CANYON DRAINAGE AREA
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange C?unty, have heretofore adopted a policy establishing
procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, engineering proposals have been
solicited for preparation of Feasibility Report re sewerage service for the Sleepy
Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee established pursuant to Districts' procedures
for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services has
negotiated a fee with Engineering-Science, Inc. for preparation of Feasibility
Report re sewerage service for the Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area; and
has submitted certification of said final negotiated fee.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 ·
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Certification of Negotiated Fee with Engineering-Science,
Inc. for engineering services in connection with Feasibility Report re sewerage
service for Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area, and the proposal for said
work arc hereby received and ordered filed; and,
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(3) -DISTRICT 2 "E-1"
.-
Section 2. That the contract for preparation of Feasibility Report re
sewerage service for the Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area be awarded to
Engineering-Science, Inc. for a maximum fee not to exceed $33,000.00, in accordance "-""
with their proposal; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said engineer for
said work pursuant to the provisions of their proposal and the contract documents
therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 8, 1976.
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #22(A)(3) --DISTRICT 2
MEETING DATE September 8, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT I
(EVANS). •..••••• GARTHE •.•••• _.J::::::::. ___ _
(EDGAR) •••••••.• SHARP .•••.• ~ ----
DIEDRICH .•• ---1...k::._ ___ _
RIMA ••• ••••• _.L_ ----
DISTRICT 2
(GROOT). ••.••••• WEDAA ••••••• ~ ___ _
HOLLINDENL .•• SCOTT ••••••• ~ ----
DIEDRICH) ....•• CLARK ••••••• _t::::_
GARTHE). ..••••• ~ • • . • • • • v ----
WEDDLE) ..•..•.• FOX ..•....••• --.,.L ----
DE J~sus>.. •••• HOLT .••.••••• ~ == ==
THOM) •••.•...•• KAYWOOD •.... ~ ___ _
PERRY ••••••• ......lL...
(HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH •••.... ~ ----
~TIPTON) •••••••• WINN ••.•.••• .....!.L_ == ==
WARD) • . • . . • • • • • WOOD • • • • • • • • -.L-__ __
GRAHAM) ...•.••• YOUNG ••••••• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 3
(WARD) ••..•.•••• WOOD ••••.••• ~ ___ _
(HOLLJNDEN) • · · · SVALSTAD· • · · ---J.L. ----
(GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· ~ ----
(WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ ----1L ----
(SYLVIA) ••...•.. ~··········~ ------
CULVER······ ~ ----
!
GARTHE) •......• ~ ••····· _1L.. --
PRIEST).······· FRESE······· --l.L-----
THOM)···· ...... KAYWOOD····· -!L-----
LACAYO) ...•..•. MAC LAIN····~ ----
DAVIS) •.....•.• ~ ••••..• ~ ___ _
OLSON·· .. ·•· ~ __ --
DIEDRICH) .. ·••· SCHMIT······ ~ ___ _ ~WI EDER) .. • .... • PATTINSON .. • ~ __ --
YOUNG)· .. ······ STEVENS .. · .. -i..L. __ --
MILLER)·· .... ·• WEISHAUPT··· _u:::::=. __ --
DISTRICT 5
MC INNIS .... ....iL. ___ _
(DIEDRICH).. .... RILEY ....... ~ ___ _
(WILLIAMS) •....• ROGERS •...•• ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 6
RIMA ••••.••• _L.. ___ _
(ROGERS) ......... RYCKOFF ..... _L ___ _
DIEDRICH···~ ___ _
DISTRICT 7
!
EDGAR) •.•...••. SALTARELLI . V ___ _
ROGERS) •.••.•.• BARRETT· .. •· --1L. ___ _
SILLS) •..•...•• BURTON ..•••• ~ ___ _
DIEDRICH) ..... · CLARK······· ~ ___ _
EVANS)· .. · .. · .. GARTHE • • .. • • ~ ___ _
GLOCKNER···· -1L-___ _
(HOYT)·· .. ••·••· SMITH······· --lL. __ --
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT...... V ___ _
. SHENKMAN .••• -.JJ.L ___ _
WIEDER ...... _L __ --
DISTRICT 8
(°'1 EDR I CH)., • • • . EY ..... .
~/ EDW ... .
(JOHNSON) .•..•.. SWEENEY·····
7 /14/76
JO INT BOARDS
(ROGERsi .•.••••• BARRETT· .•••• _.JL:._ __
DIEDRICH ···...Lb'... --
!GRAY)) •••••••••• BLACKMAN •••• ~ __
SILLS ···~······BURTON •••••• -L __
DI ED R IC HJ •••••• CLARK • • • • • • . v __
WEDDLEL •.••••• COOPER ..••••• -L __
SYLVIA) ••••••••• MK •••.•••••• ~ __
CULVER ••••.•• ~ __
~GARTHE). .••••••• ~ •••.•••• ~ _
WEDDLE) ..••.•••• FOX •..•••.••• -7 __
PRIEST) .......... FRESE •.•.•••• ___ _
~) .......... G:':RTl'.E. •••••• -=-__
GLOCKNER •..• --;..L. __
~DE J~sus) ...... HOLT ....•.••. _.iL --
THOM) ••..••.•••• KAYWOOil ..••• ~ __
LACAYO) •••••..•• MAC. LA IN.... V"" __
MC INNIS ••.• ~ __
(DAVIS) •••••••••• ~ .••••..• ~--
OLSON ••.••..• ~ __
(WI EDER) •..••••• PATTINSON... t./" __
PERRY........ I./ __
(DIEDRICH) .•.••. RILEY •.•..••• ~ __
RIMA ••••.••.• ~ __
~WILLIA~S) •.•.•• ROGERS .••.••. _L __
ROGERS} •••••••• RYCKOFF...... v""'" __
EDGAR) ••..•.•.•• SALTARELLI •• ~ __
DIEDRICH) .•..•. SCHMIT....... L/"""" __
(HOLLI NDEN) ..••• SCOTT .....••• -1:::'.:.... __
(EDGAR) ..••.•••.• SHARP .....••• ~ __
SHENKMAN •.•• ~ __
(HOYT) .•••.••••.• SMITH ...••••. ~ __
(YOUNG) .....•••.. STEVENS ••••. -L-__
(HOLLI NDEN) ••.•. SVALSTAD •••• __..L.. __
(GROOT) •..•••••.. WEDAA ...••••• ~ __
(MILLERL ••••••• WEISHAUPT •.. _L_ __
WIEDER •.•••• _L_ __
~TIPTONL •••••.• WINN......... \/" __
WARD) •••••••.•.• .WOOD ..•..•••• _lL_ __
GRAHAML ••..••• YOUNG .•.•••.• ___.L_ __
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
MEETING D~TE September 8, 1976 TIME ?·30 pm DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
DISTRICT 1
{EVANS). •.•••••• GARTHE •••••• _____ _
(EDGAR) •••••••.• SHARP ••.••. ------DIEDRICH .•• _____ _
RIMA • • • • • • · • ------
DISTRICT 2
{GROOT) •••. ). ••••• WEDAA ••••••• _____ _
(HOLLI NDEN ...•• SCOTT •••••••
(DIEDRICH) ..•..• CLARK .••.•.• ------
(GARTHE). ••.•... EVANS ••••••• ------
~WEDDLE) .•.•••.• FOX ..••.••••• ------
DE J~sus) ••••.• HOLT ••.•••••• == == ==
THOM) ••••••.... KAYWOOD •..•.
PERRY ••••••• ------
(HOYT) ••••.••••• SMITH ••••••• ------
~TIPTON) •••••••. WINN ... 1rtfb. -1 == ==
WARD) ••••...•.. WOOD ••• :h • J ___ _
GRAHAM) .••••••• YOUNG • • • • • • • _____ _
DISTRICT 3
(WARD) •••...••.• WOOD •••.•••• _____ _
(HOLLJNDEN). ·•· SVALSTAD···· ____ --
(GRAY).········· BLACKMAN···· _. _ ---· _
(WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ ------
(SYLVIA).· .. •·•• COX·········· ____ __
CULVER······ ------
!
GARTHE) .. ······EVANS······· __ ----
PRIEST).· .. · .. · FRESE······· ____ --
THOM)· ......... KAYWOOD····· ------
LACAYO) •..•.... MAC LAIN···· ------
DAVIS)········· MEYER ...... • __ ----
OLSON · · · · • • • ------
(WI EDER).······· PATTINSON··· ____ --
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT······ ____ --
(YOUNG)········· STEVENS····· _____ _
(MILLER) ........ WEISHAUPT··· ____ --
DISTRICT 5
MC INNIS •••. _____ _
(DIEDRICH) .•.• ~. RILEY ..•.••• _____ _
(WILLIAMS) .•.... ROGERS .•..•• _____ _
DISTRICT 6
RIMA •.••••••
(ROGERS) ......... RYCKOFF ..... == == == DIEDRICH··· _____ _
DISTRICT 7
!
EDGAR) •.•..••.• SALTARELLI • _____ _
ROGERS).······· BARRETT····· _____ _
SILLS) ......... BURTON.· .. •• _____ _
DIEDRICH) ..... • CLARK· ... •·• _____ _
EVANS)········· GARTHE • • .... _____ _
GLOCKNER····
(HOYT) .. ·•··• .. • SMITH······· == == ==
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _____ _
. SHENKMAN .... _____ _
WIEDER .••••• _____ _
DISTRICT 8
(DIEDRICHL .... RILEY •....••
EDWARDS .... .
(JOHNSON) .••.... SWEENEY .... •
7 /14/76
JOINT BOARDS
(RoGrnsi •••••••• BARRETT· .••.• _I __ _
DIEDRICH •·• _iL_ --
!
GRAY)) •• · •••••••• BLACKMAN •••• _, __ _
SILLS ···~······BURTON •••••. _'/ __ _
DIEDRICHJ ...... CLARK ....... + __
WEDDLE) .•••••••• COOPER ••••••• ___ _
SYLVIA) •••••••. :cIDr. ......... + __
CULVER ••••••. ___ _
~GARTHE~ •••••••.• E-¥-A-NS •••••••• __;!,,_ __
WEDDLE ••••••••• FOX •••••.•••. _.; __ _
PR I EST •••••••.•• ~~ ~~~:.: •.•• ~-
EVANS) •••••••••. ~ •• 7---
GLOCKNER •••• ___ _
~DE J~sus) ...... HOLT......... I --
THOM) ........... KAYWOOU ..... -7-__
LACAYOL ....... MAC LAIN .•.• -r __
MC INNIS .... -]--__
(DAVI s) •••••••••• MEYf!R-: ,, •••.• ___ _
OLSON ........ +--
(WI EDER) ........ PATT I NSON... ·
PERRY........ ~, ==
( D I ED R IC H) .•..•• R I LEY. . • . . • • • ·
RIMA ......... --f--
WILLIAt-1S) •••..• ROGERS....... --
ROGERSl •••••••• RYCKOFF .•.••• -7
EDGAR) ••..•••..• SAL TAR ELLI.. --
DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ••.•••• --5-==
HOLLI NDEN) .•••• SCOTT ....•••.
EDGAR) .......... SHARP........ l)J ==
SHENKMAN.... 0..,,
(HOYT) .•••••.••.. SMITH ........ --Y --
(YOUNG) .......... STEVENS ••••. --+==
(HOLLI NDEN) ••.•. SVALSTAD.... ·
(GROOT) .......... WEDAA........ ? ==
(MILLERl •.••••.. WEISHAUPT... __
WIEDER •.•••• ---:r
(TIPTONL ••••••• WINN ......... -r ==
(WARD) ••••••.••.•. WOOD......... . __
(GRAHAML ••.•••• YOUNG ••.•.••• 7_ __
OTHERS
HARPER \'/
w.4Ji~ SYLVESTER -v
LEWIS ./
~o CLARKE _L
BWbGR __, ].ril\./""'"'-. BROWN --vr-
!h~,l~
WOODRUFF -:/
!! ev~ HOHENER _L. f:xc
HOWARD ~/ ~~~If-HUNT
KEITH
\. KENNEY ~ LYNCH
MADDOX ~ MARTINSON
PI ER SALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
JOINT CHAIRMAN
9-8-76
CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR 5:30 P.M.J WEDNESDAY
SEPTEMBER 22ND. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND
AND PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSIONS,
~
MEYER
~
PATTINSON
REPORT ON THE ANNUAL CASA MEETING IN SAN DIEGO, YOU MAY WISH TO
CALL ON DIRECTOR BARRETT FOR HIS COMMENTS,
I I -
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
September 2, 1976
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 11
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976, 6:00 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of August 11, 1976, the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, will meet in an adj 0 1.irned regular meeting at the above hour
and date. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss the Draft Master
Plan of Sewer Facilities for County Sanitation District No. 11.
A light dinner will be served.
JWS:rb
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orang~ County, California
DISTRICT No. 11
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 8J 1976 -6:00 P.M.
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment ~f Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(3) Discussion re Draft Master Plan of Sewer Facilities for County
Sanitation District No . 11 (copies of proposed District Master Plan
and proposed City Master Plan enclosed) ·
(4) Other business and communications
(5) Consideration of motion to adjourn
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULA R
JO INT MEETING OF THE BOARD S OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7 AN D 11,
1 OF ORAN GE COUNTY , CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Bo ards of Direc tors of County San ita tion Distr icts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, Cali fo rnia, was held at the hour
of 7:30 p.m., September 8 , 1976 , 10844 Elli s Avenue, Fountain Val ley, California.
The Chairman o f the Joint Adm ini s trative Organization cal led the mee ting to order
at 7 : 30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretar y reported a quorum present.
* * * * * * * * *
DI STRICT 1 Moved, secon ded a nd du l y carried :
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of Coun ty San i tation District No. 1 be adjourned to
5:00 p.m ., September 22, 1976, The Chairman then declared t he
meeting so adjourned a t 8:21 p.m ., September 8, 1976.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That t h is meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to
7 :00 p.m ., September 13, 1976, at Huntington Beach Cit y Hal l .
The Chairman then dec l ared the meeting so adjourned at 8:22 p.m .,
September 8, 1976.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded a nd duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of Co unty Sanitation District No . 5 be ad j ourned t o
5 :30 p.m., September 21 , 197 6, at Newport Beach City Hall.
Th e Chairman then dec l ared the meeting so adjourned a t 8:40 p.m .,
Sept ember 8 , 1976 .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS .
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTE R, Secr e tary of each of the Boards o f Directors of
County Sanitation Districts No s. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, an d 11, of Orange County,
Californ ia, do h ereby certify that the above a nd foregoi ng to be full, true
and correct c opy of minute entries on mee ting of said Boards of Dire ctors on
the 8th day of September , 19 76 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave he reunto
19 76 .
S-107
l.
day of September
e oards Direct ors
tation Districts Nos.
6, 7, and 11
September 3, 1976
TO: DISTRICT NO. 11 DIRECTORS
SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
I 0844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Adjourned Regular Meeting on September 8, 1976
Enclosed herewith are the Draft Master Plans referred to under
subject agenda item. The meeting notice and agenda were mailed
under separate cover.
Enclosures (2)
Rita Brown
Assistant to the Secretary
of the Board
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
August 12, 1976 -5:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held August 11, 1976, the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date,
at the Newport Beach City Hall.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The roll was called,
and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT:
DIRECTORS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHER PRESENT:
Kerm Rima (Chairman) and Paul Ryckoff
Ralph Diedrich
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, and
Dennis Reid
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Director Don Mcinnis, Director Thomas
Riley, Director Howard Rogers, ·Richard
Reese, Don Simpson, and Bill Soto
* * * * * * * * * * *
Approval of minutes Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved
as mailed.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of
Joint Operating and Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund claims That payment of Districts' claims on the
following dates be, and is hereby, rati-
fied in the total amounts so indicated:
Fund
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
July 20, 1976
$164,407.76
14,212.44
$178,620.20
August 3, 1976
$108,429.61
539,201.45
$64 7, 631. 06
in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-3" and
"B-1" through "B-3", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
8/12/76
Approving Change Order No. 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. J-9-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the pians and ~
specifications for Surge Tower No. 2
Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No; J-9-2, granting a time exten-
sion of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company, be
approved due to delays caused by having to coord~nate the work with the
Districts' operations. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
Approving Change Order No. 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. Pl-16 That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and
specifications for 46 MGD Activated
Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing
an addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction Company,
be approved for purchase of a spare pump impellar. Copy of this change
order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving plans and
specifications for Job
No. J-6-lD That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans
and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at
Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, and authorizing advertising
for bids to be received on August 31, 1976. Certified copy of this
re3olution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Approving plans and Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
specifications for
Specification No. E-080 That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-133, approving plans
and specifications for Three (3) Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of
Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080, and authorizing the
General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the
best bidder for an amount not to ex~eed $50,000. Certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving plans and
specifications for Job
No. I-4-lR That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-134, approving plans
and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities, Job No.
I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on October 5,
1976. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
Awarding contract for Automatic
Gate Operators, Diversion
Structure at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. PW-052
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-135, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation,
and awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, to Instrwnentation &
Mechanical Systems, Inc., in the amount of $22,688.00. Certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-2-
Awarding purchase order
contract for Purchase of
50% Caustic Soda Solution,
Specification No. P-024
8/12/76
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommenda-
tion for Purchase of 50% Caustic Soda
Solution,· Specification No. P-024, be
received and ordered filed; and that award of said purchase to Stauffer
Chemical Company, for the price of $.10 per pound for a maximum amount
not to exceed $75,000, be authorized.
Accepting Job No. P2-8-8
as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-136, accepting Brookhurst st·reet Improvements in the
City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, as complete; authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agree-
ment. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
Approving Grant of Easement
to Southern California
Edison Company at Plant No.
2 for transformer vaults
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-137, approving Grant
of Easement to Southern California
Edison Company for installation of three underground transformer vaults
behind the sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundaries of Plant
No. 2, for no fee. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing Joint Chairman or
Vice Joint Chairman and two
staff members to attend WPCF
and AMSA meetings; and autho-
rizing reimbursement for expenses
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint
Chairman and two staff members be
authorized to attend cqncurrent meetings
of the Water Pollution Control Federation
and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, October 3-8, 1976; and that reimbursement for travel, meals,
lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance
at said meetings, be authoriz~d.
Approving waiver of quarterly
administrative charge to
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
District No. 8 That waiver of the $150.00 quarterly
administrative charge to County Sani-
tation District No. 8 for fiscal year 1976-77, be approved.
Re.ceive and file written
report of the Executive
Committee
received and ordered filed.
Approving Memorandum of
Understanding with OCEA
re proposed retirement
system transfer
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the written report of the Executive
Committee, dated August 4, 1976, be
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Tirnt the Memorandum of Understanding
with Orange County Employees Association
relative to terms and conditions of
proposed transfer from Public Employees Retirement System to Orange County
Employees Retirement System, be approved.
-3-
8/12/76
Declaring intent to approve
transfer of Districts'
retirement program from
PERS to OCERS
from Public Employees Retirement
Retirement System, in accordance
Code.
Approving amendment to LA/OMA
Joint Powers Agreement re
increase of scope of said
study, and approving parti-
cipation in ocean disposal
studies
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the-Board of Directors hereby
declare their intent to approve a trans-
fer of the Districts' retirement program
System to the Orange County Employees
with Section 20569 of the Government
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-144, approving amend-
ment to the Joint· Powers Los Angeles/
Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional
Wastewater Solids Management Program
agreement, to provide for an increase in the scope of the study and a
grant augmentation therefor; and funding of the ineligible portion of
the ocean disposal studies and authorizing participation in said ocean
disposal studies. ·certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these min~tes.
Policy re Executive
Committee member attendance
at State association
meetings
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That a policy be hereby established
that each Executive Committee member,
or the member's designee, be authorized
to attend State association workshops and executive meetings on behalf
of the Districts; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for fees and expenses in accordance
with established Board policy be authorized and approved.
Receive and file staff
report re additional
hydraulic treatment
capacity
filed.
Receive and file staff
report re JPL-ACTS process
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That t~e staff report on additional
hydraulic treatment capacity, dated
August 5, 1976, be received and ordered
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff report on the operation
and evaluation phase of the JPL-ACTS process, dated August 4, 1976, be
received and ordered filed.
Authorizing staff to proceed
with facility modifications
to the JPL-ACTS process and
continued operation and
evaluation, subject to
SWRCB approval
approval of the State Water
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff be authorized to proceed
with facility modifications to the JPL-
ACTS process and continued operation
and evaluation of said process through
June 30, 1977, subject to written
Resources Control Board.
-4-
8/12/76
Approving revised Step 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
Facilities Plan, EIS and
,..,_,. Pilot Plant evaluation That the revised Step 1 Facilities Plan,
budget, and authorizing Environmental Impact Statement and Pilot
transfer of funds for Plant evaluation budget in the amount of
continued operation and $4,170,000, be approved; and,
evaluation and necessary
modifications to the FURIBER MOVED: That transfer of up to
JPL-ACTS process $489,000 to the Joint Operating Fund
from the Operating Fund Unappropriated
Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their propor-
tional participation in the Joint Operating budget, for continued operation
and evaluation of said process, be authorized;· and,
FURTIIER MOVED: That transfer of up to $125,000 to the Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund from the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Reserves of
the respective Districts, in accordance with their Joint Works equity
percentage participation in the CORF budget, for necessary modifica-
tions to the JPL-ACTS process, be authorized.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Authorizing General Manager
to employ Part-time Techni-
cians re JPL-ACTS process That the General Manager be authorized
to employ Part-time Technicians as
provided in Resolution No. 75-138, as amended by Resolution No. 76-24,
through June 30, 1977, in connection with continued operation of the
JPL-ACTS process.
Authorizing amendment to the
NASA contract re JPL-ACTS
process for required
services re continued
operation and evaluation of
said process
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
. .
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-145, authorizing
amendment to the contr~ct with National
Aeronautics and Space Administration re
JPL-ACTS process for required services
in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS
process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. Certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing amendment to
the John Carollo Engineers
contract for required
services re continued
operation and evaluation
of the JPL-ACTS process
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 76-146, authorizing
amendment to the contract with John
Carollo Engineers for required services
in connection with continued operation
and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount
for services by $75,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-5-
8/12/76
Approval of 1976-77
fiscal year budgets
Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried
by roll call vote:
That the District's 1976-77 fiscal· year budgets be and they are hereby
approved and adopted in the following total amounts:
DISTRICT 6
Operating Fund
Bond and Interest -1951
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
$ 575,459
64,598
3,396,441
TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $4,036,498
FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed.
Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned
at 5:10 p.m., August 12, 1976.
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County·, California
-6-
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
v 30344
30345
30346
30347
30348
30349
30350
30351
30352
30353
30354
30355
30356
30357
30358
30359
30360
30361
30362
30363
30364
30365
303~6
3'0367
30368
~ 30369
"30370
30371
30372
30373
30374
30375
30376
30377
30378
30379
30380
30381
30382
30383
30384
30385
30386
30387
30388
30389
30390
30391
30392
30393
._,.,,,, 30394
30395
30396
30397
Alex Fish Company, Lab Supplies
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearing Material
Allensworth Company, Sight Dome
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals (MO 12-10-75)
American Kleaner Mfg Co., Inc., Truck Parts
City of Anaheim, Power
V. B. Anderson, Truck Parts
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Beckman Instruments, Controls
W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage
C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair
CS Company, Valves
Cals Cameras, Photo Supplies
R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage
Civic Center Lock & Safe, Lock Repair
Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance, Employee Bond
Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County of Orange, Training Meeting
County Wholesale Electric, Supplies
Mr. Crane, Equipment Rental
Crane Packing Company, Engine Repair
Culligan Deioninzed Water Service, Lab Supplies
Clarence Cununings, Employee Mileage
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Daniels Tire Service, Tires
C. R. Davis Supply Company, Hardware
Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill
Filter Supply Company, Filters
Fischer & Porter Company, Valves
Foss Company, Lab Supplies
Compressor Products Division of Garlock, Compressor Parts
Garrett Industrial Supply Company, Cleaners
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
Graphic Controls, Chart Paper
Griffith Company, Regrade Manhole
Hasty Lawn & Garden, Hedge Trimmer
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires
Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts
City of Huntington Beach, Plant #2 Water
Hurley Electronics, Inc., Lamps
Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware
International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement
Irvine Ranch Water Districts, Line Cleaning Water
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Knox Industrial Supplies, Plastic Sheeting
LBWS, Inc., Safety Equipment, Nitroien, Oxygen, Acetylene
L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service
"A-1"
$
AMOUNT
53.00
262.76
23.17
22,625.07
90.59
147.27
8.80
240.73
646.20
16.65
695.00
386.25
74.22
5.40
4.00
6,162.00
101.18
160.86
6,194.20
241. 56
70.00
103.80
244.00
206.01
40.00
12.00
309.48
262.54
349.80
175.00
67.60
421.97
100.70
268.74
. 39. 43
2,279.36
41.34
945.00
22.54
1,400.00
205.96
300.00
743.51
434.09
597.96
850.62
303 .16
213.55
968.19
19.56
189.19
207.65
217.90
11515.85
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30398
30399
30400
30401
30402
30403
30404
30405
30406
30407
30409
30410
30411
30412
30413
30414
30415
30416
30417
30418
30419
30420
30421
30422
30423
30424
30425
30426
30427
304.28
30429
30430
30431
30432
30433
30434
30435
30436
30437
30438
30439
30440
30441
30442
30443
30444
30445
30446
Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware $
Mccalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts
McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL
Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints
Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
Multiquip, Inc., Equipment Parts
National Chemsearch, Odor Control Chemicals
City of Newport Beach, Water
Orange County Water District, Basin Equity Replenishment
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Red Valve Company, Inc., Expansion Joint
Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum
Routh Transportation, Oil Removal
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motors
Sargent Welch Scientific Compapy, Lab Supplies
Seal Methods, Inc., Pump Packing
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools, JPL Vacuum
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Sims Industrial Supply, Safety Glass
Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service
Southern California Edison, Power
Southern California Costal Water, 1976-77 Deposit
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Drinking Water
Standard Concrete Material, Concrete
State of California, Department of Transportation, State Pennit Inspection
Surveyors Service Company, Office Supplies
J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement
Bruce J. Taylor, Employee Mileage
Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings
'Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Steel
Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Delivery
United Riggers and Erectors, Engine Unloading
Unites States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, Odor Consultant
Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Materials
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
James Wybenga, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Service, EDP Services
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction
Everett H. York, Engine Parts
AMOUNT
50.98"
36. 25.
524.70
40.81
9.50
1,100.28
68.02
246.98
9.81
386.76
303.48
180.13
23.70
1,083.97
956.09
381. 85
106.93
80.38
428.24
94.82
43.38
25.14
395.00
5 ,371. 07
86,600.~
186.56
92.08
33.06
32.05
233.64
41.46
1,051.60
1,450.81
82.20
14.32
666.63
279.84
132.96
. 34. 26
43.86
220.60
431. 42
2,524.50
16.20
59.22
4,186.95
1,490.27
289.59
$ 164,407~
"A-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN· PAYOR OF
....,. 30341 Hasty Lawn & Garden, Groundskeeping Equipment
30342 Safety.Service and Supply, JPL Filters
30343 Valve and Primer Corporation, Retention J-6-1
"A-3"
AMOUNT
$ 303.22
213.17
13,696.05
$ 14,212.44
$ 178,620.20
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30490
30491
30492
30493
3·0494
30495
30496
30497
30498
30499
30500
30501
30502
3.0503
30504
30505
30506
30507
30508
30509
30510
30511
30512
30513
30514
30515
30516
30517
30518
30519
30520
30521
30522
30523
30524
30525
30526
30527
30528
30594
30529
30530
30531
30532
30533
30534
30535
30536
30537
30538
30539
30540
30541
30542
A-1 Metal Services Corporation, Control Panel
AM-Fremont Bag & Salvage, Building Materials
Advance Business Forms, Computer Paper
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings
American Chemical Society, Periodical
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts, Gaskets
American Society for Testing, Catalog
The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing
Associated Concrete Products, Grade Rings
Charles M. Bailey Company, Inc., Valve Parts
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuilt Magtronic.
Thomas G. Brisco, Employee Mileage
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Employee Exams
C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair
Cals Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Castle Controls, Inc., Valves
Coast Insurance Agency, Fire Insurance Premium
Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware
College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies
F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies
Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies
Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies
Enterprise Printing, Printing
Fischer & Porter Company, Regulator Parts
Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-way Mapping
Edward R. Francis, Employee Expense Reimbursement, Pl-16
General Telephone Company
HMK Marketeer Limited, Electric Cart Parts
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tubes
House of Batteries, Batteries
Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts & Repairs
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Tools
Keenan Pipe and Supply, Pipe
King Bearing, Inc., Couplings, Bearings, V Belts
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies
LBWS, Inc., Acetylene, Oxygen
L & N Unifonn Supply Company, Unifonn Service
Life Security Systems, First Aid Supplies
Los Angeles Times, Subscription
A. J. Lynch Company, Janitorial Supplies
McCalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts
McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL
Mobil Oil Corporntion, Petroleum Products
National Lumber Supply, Building Materials
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nolex Corporation, Specification Supplies
"B-1"
$
AMOUNT
309.5~
275.63
207.72
117. 00
128.88
12.00
708.55
7.09
232.47
101. 76
138.03
112 .16
17.70
26.00
485.00
89,.64
·80. 56
7,500.00
200.49
325.82
1,238.50
140.14
310.13
51.90
13.4(
31.8~
528.61
104.52
1,282.01
1,757.80
138.23
220.40
87.62
52.83
370.44
516.30
10.11
121.48
46.64
143.58
319.31
479.20
382.94
335.16
593.16
515.39
49.00
109.07
63.07
5,239.11'
74.7~
18.79
5. 27 .
227.42
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO.
30543
30544
30546
30547
30548
30549
30550
30551
30552
30553
30554
30555
30556
30557
30558
30559
30560
30561
30562
30563
30564
30565
30566
30567
30568
30569
30570
30571
30572
30573
30574
30575
30576
30577
30578
30579
30580
30581
30582
30583
30584
30585
30586
30587
30588
30589
30590
30591
30592
30593
Office Equipment Company, Calculator Repair
Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp
Oreo Block Company, Inc., Concrete Blocks
Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Industrial Supply, Tools
Pacific Telephone
M C Patten Corporation, Instrumentation
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Actuary Service
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Postmaster
Quality Building Supply, Plastic Cement, Silica Sand
RFL c/o Luscombe Engineering, Controls
The Register, Bid Notice P-024
The Republic Supply, Pipe Fittings
Rewes-Schock, JV, Contractor 11-lR-1
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Ryan Herco, Lab Supplies
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repairs
Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools
Shepherd Machinery Company, Conveyor Repair
Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies
Southern California Edison, Power
South Orange Supply, PVC Pipe
Southern California Gas Company, Natural Gas
Southern California Water Company, Water
Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Drinking Water
Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline
Sun Electric Corporation, Fan Parts
The Suppliers, Tools
Surveyors Service Company
Tatkin Company, Regulator
C.O. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene
Title Insurance & Trust Company, Title Report 7-6-9
Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings
Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Gauges
Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Exhaust Fan Repair
United Parcel Service, Delivery
Unites· States Elevator Corporation, Maintenance Agreement
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Van Waters & Rogers, Caustic Soda
Warren and Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fittings
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Western Salt Company, Salt
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies
Zellar's Cycle, Bicycle
"B-2"
$
AMOUNT
48.43
13.30
424.48
1,378.22
85.48
349.79
496.04
354.68
700.00
324.82
500.00
779.43
76.11
20.00
774.03
8,416.58
336:73
58.97
233.05
134.79
401. 85 '
415.73
2,794.78
580.64
51,594.42
9.81
2,471.32
3.74
20.99
232.45
7.48
31.64
413.05
114. 00
90.63
67.76
SO.OD
186.00
38.47
615.50
113. 08
8.07
33.00
3,107.41
2,033.24
116 .17
155.74
114. 88
185.71
262.90
$ 108,429 .. 61
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976
CAPITAL.OtITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
30344A Beverly Pacific Corporation, Contractor PW-047
30345A Burling Instrument Company, Temporary .Controls
30346A Calgon Corporation, Activated Carbon, JPL
30347A John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, JPL
30348A County of Orange, Compaction Testing P2-8-8
30349A Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16
30350A Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
30351A Fleming Construction, Contractor P2-8-8
30352A General Electric Supply, Recording Meter
30353A J.B. Gilbert & Associates, Facilities Plan EIR
30354A Isco Company, Instrumentation
30355A Imperial Oil & Grease Company, Grease JPL Maintenance
30356A McCalla Brothers, Contractor PW-049
30357A Mine Safety Applicances Company, Safety Equipment
30358A NASA-Pasadena Office, Release Retention, JPL
30359A Pepsi Company Building Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent
30360A Ramsey Engineering Company, Field Service, Weighveyor JPL
30361A The Register, Bid Notice PW-052
30362A Smith Emery, Pipe Testing Pl-16
30363A Truesdal, Scrubber Emissions Testing, JPL
30364A F.T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2
"B-3"
$
$
$
AMOUNT
2J135. 81'-"'
58.03
4,134.00
1,489.65
631. 96
446,260.20
340.85
701.18
916.90
21,124.84
1,774.14
212.96
3,784.14
195.89
48,019.40
254.40
805.13
98,97
13.00
1,750.00
4,500.00
539,201.45
647 ,631. 06~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
August 12, 1976 -5:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held August 11, 1976, the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S of Orange County,
California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date,
at the Newport Beach City Hall.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The roll was called,
and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
.DIRECTORS PRESENT:
DIRECTORS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Don Mc!nnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley,
and Howard Rogers
None
Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne
Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, and
Dennis Reid
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Director Ray Williams, Don Simpson,
Lloyd Coffelt, Bill Soto, and Dick Reese
* * * * * * * * * * *
Directing General Counsel to
draft agreement re conditions
relative to annexation of
down-coast area to the District
Pursuant to the request of the Irvine
Company relative to sewerage se.rvice by
District No. S for the down-coast area,
presently outside of District boundaries,
the staff prepared a report outlining
five alternatives for providing said service. The staff .reviewed the
report and existing and proposed facilities which would be necessary to
service the Irvine coastal area between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach.
Following review by the Chairman of District policy relative to co-terminus
boundaries of District No. S and the City of Newport Beach, it was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That the Staff Report, Newport-Irvine Coastal Area Proposed Development
and _Sewer Service, dated July 30, 1976, be received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That Alternative V of said report be endorsed by the Board
of Directors, and that the General Counsel be directed to draft an agree-
ment with the Irvine Company incorporating the provisions of Alternate V
and the present District policy relative to boundaries, for consideration
by the Board at the regular September 8, 1976, meeting.
Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. S be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned
at 5:45 p.m., August 12, 1976.
8/12/76
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
-2-
EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, was held on October 27
19 76 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
and a quorum of the Board was reported present.
The roll was called
Directors present: John Garthe, Chairman, James Sharp and Kerm Rima
Directors absent: Ralph Diedrich
Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary of the Board.
DISTRICT 1
Reaffirming and
ratifying 8/11/76
and 9/8/76 Board
actions
* * * * * * * * *
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That all actions of the Board of Directors
of District No. l, acting either jointly
with other Districts of the Joint Administra-
tive Organization, or individually as
District No. l, reflected in the minutes of the regular meetings on
August 11, 1976, and September 8, 1976, are hereby reaffirmed and ratified.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify
the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute ·entries
· on record taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, on the 27th
day of October , 19 76 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
seal of County Sanitation District No. 1
19 76 •
~-110
....,...,li,.""""'-of Directors of
on District No. 1
-
-
-
FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RAITT STREET TRUNK
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 7
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1976
-
-
...
-
...
...
...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RAITT STREET TRUNK
for
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127 _
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7
of Orange County, California
August, 1976
Prepared by Dennis M. Reid
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
...
...
-
...
-
-
-
-
I. Introduction
Figure 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. Project and Site
III. Impacts
A. Land
B. Air Quality
C. Water Quality/Public Health
Flora and Fauna
Traffic
1
2
3
4-6
7-8
9
9
9
D.
E .
F.
G.
Archaeological/Paleontological Resources 10
H.
I.
Population
Public Service
Noise
IV. Mitigation Measures
A. Air Quality
Traffic
10
10
10
11
11 B.
c. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources 11
V. References
VI. Alternatives
12
13
VII. Organizations and Individuals Contacted 14.
...
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
This Draft Environmental Impact Report is for the proposed Raitt
Street Trunk. The Trunk is part of a master plan of interceptor
and trunk facilities adopted by the Boards of Directors of County
-Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County, California, in
November, 1969. The master plans of Districts Nos. 1 and 7 are
....
based on land use plans of the cities in the Districts and are
designed to fulfill the Districts' needs to the Year 2000. The ...
Raitt Street Trunk is designed to intercept all flow from the
... Myrtle Street Trunk, which carries flow from the North Bristol
Trunk. This will relieve the Santa Ana and Greenville-Sullivan
...
Trunks and service new developments south of Warner Avenue
..,, (Figure 1).
This report addresses those subjects specifically required by
the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environ-... mental Quality Act. The report follows the format set forth in
the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Guidelines . ...
.. Also according to established guidelines, this draft is being
circulated for review by the responsible agencies and other
agencies with jurisdiction. After the review period, a final
Environmental Impact Report will be prepared for the proposed
project .
...
.... 1 .
I
-
-11· 71·
,.
l~
I vt•iY OF COSTA MESA
'
'
. ~
i
I -....,,,,
FIGURE 1. .·.
i
-:-!:. ... _
< .I
•'
' ' ''
\
:
2.
..
'
I
/.
/.
.'/ ,,
,/
•,
COUHTY SANITATION DISTRICf
BOUl<DARY
COUPITY SAHITATION DISTRICT
OF O?..\f.Gi COUNTY
CXISTISG DISTRICT ltO. I
TRUNK SEWERS
.. _. .. iilllill-X• PROPOSFO Dl\TRICT NO. I
lRullK $£\HRS
·---···· f XISTl.\C s.111 i~ ~~A fRU'IK
~O'll~ Hi SE ~i,QiJIRlO
~one UlC!!iElRIHG COU~IY ~!'HP.l!UH OlSTP.ICl "0 I
....
...
....
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
SECTION II
PROJECT AND SITE
The Raitt Trunk, which is located entirely in District No. 7,
extends northerly from Sunflower Avenue to Alton Avenue and will
serve all land area tributary to the proposed Trunk within Dis-
trict No. 7. The Trunk will be located in easements yet to be
obtained. Construction of the Trunk will consist of approxi-
mately 4,200 feet of 30-inch vitrified clay pipe, together with
required manholes and appurtenant work. The Raitt Street Trunk
extends along the proposed easement from the Raitt Trunk to Alton
Avenue and on Raitt Street to Myrtle Street. Construction of the
Trunk will consist of approximately 7,300 feet of 27-inch vitri-
fied clay pipe, 3,500 feet of 24-inch vitrified clay pipe, and
2,800 feet of 21-inch vitrified clay pipe, together with required
manholes and appurtenant work •
The easements that need to be acquired are a strip of land 30-
feet wide and approximately 3,100 feet in length, lying in a
southerly projection of Raitt Street between Sunflower Avenue
and Alton Avenue (2.1± acres) .
3.
A.
...
...
....
...
...
....
...
...
...
...
Land
SECTION III
IMPAcrs
The local surrounding area is a mixture of residential,
industrial and open space. The open space land has been
used for agricultural purposes for many years and is currently
growing row crops for conunercial markets. The encroachment
of open space for residential and industrial purposes has
been very heavy in this area over the past ten years •
Pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965,
some of the open space has been designated as "Prime
Agricultural Land" (Figure 2). The designation of Prime
Agricultrual Land was made by the Office of Planning and
Research, State of California, according to the definition
of this land in the Land Conservation Act as follows:
(1) All land which qualified for rating as Class I or
Class II in the Soil Conservation Service's Land
Use Capability classifications .
(2) Land which qualified for rating 80 through 100 in
the Storie Index Rating .
(3) Land which supports livestock used for the pro-
duction of food and fiber and which has an annual
carrying capacity equivalent to at least one
animal unit per acre as defined by the U. S.
Department of Agriculture.
4 '
-
.
~·
-
-
-
..
-
_, -
-·
-·
-:
-
Propose.d
.... ......__. • .... • • ,. J • LEGEND
gy>{l 2210 PRIME LANDS S.C.S. CLASSt:S 1 & 2 w --URBAN
·~··· ... ....... · izzo POTENTIAL PRIME AGR !CULTURAL
LANDS --PROJECTED 1985 URBAN BCUNDARY
~ ~ LANDS GROSSING $200 PER ACRE ~ 2240
~
ANNUAL CARRYING C~ACITY
ONE ANIMAL UNIT PER ACRE
PRIME F~GRICULTUP.AL LANDS
Figure 2
5.
...:-.1• ..
MAY 1974
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(4) Land planted with fruit or nut-bearing trees,
vines, bushes or crops which have a nonbearing period
of less than five years and which will normally
return during the commercial bearing period on an
annual basis from the production of unprocessed
agricultural plant production not less than $200 per
acre.
(5) Land which has returned from the production of un-
processed agricultural plant products an annual gross
value of not less than $200 per acre for three of the
previous five years.
It should be stressed that, according to the Act, the definition
of prime agricultural land is fluid and as the needs of the
State change so may the definition.
The proposed project will provide additional capacity for
future development as well as provide relief for the existing
overburdened trunk sewer system. The project will remove one
of the limitations to future development within existing zoning
in the surrounding area and contribute to the loss of open
space agricultural land.
The total proposed project, except a stretch of 3,100 feet at
the southerly end, will be within existing street right-of-way.
The southerly end will be impacted to the extent of 2.1± acres
during the construction period, at which time agricultural
operations will cease until the construction is completed.
6.
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
B. Air Quality
The air quality of a given location is directly affected by
the meteorological characteristics of the surrounding area.
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7, in general, are typified
by a "Mediterranean" climate, featuring winters with
temperatures ranging from 45°F at night to 65°F during the
daytime, and mild summer temperatures of 68°F to 75°F.
Typically, winter low temperatures range from 40°F to S0°F
and maximum summer temperatures rarely exceed l00°F. The
prevailing daytime wind at the project site is from the
southwest: during the nighttime hours, the prevailing sea
breeze reverses direction so that the wind is from the
northeast.
Districts Nos. 1 and 7 are located within the South Coast
Air Basin, one of the eleven basins designated by the
California Air Resources Board. These basins represent
areas which meteorologically share a common air mass, and
consequently often share common air pollution problems.
Unfortunately, these are subject to the same inversion
conditions which prevail over most of the basin. These
inversions are primarily subsidence inversions during the
warm summer months, caused by a marine layer of air that
inhibits vertical mixing of pollutants. In addition,
radiation inversions are likely to be present in the winter,
especially during the early morning hours.
7.
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
...
-
In general, the impact of a project upon air quality is
determined by evaluating the sources of air pollutant emissions
locally and the increase in air pollutants regionally. In
addition, the impact analysis assesses the project's short-term
and long-term impact on air quality.
Preparing the site for construction produces two sources for
air pollutant emissions:
(1) Exhaust emission from construction equipment.
(2) Dust generated as the result of soil movement.
The emissions produced during excavating are of short-term
duration and are, therefore, not considered in detail. Con-
struction of the proposed development will produce some dust
particulate emissions and subsequent distribution of dust
that may be troublesome to the residents in adjacent tracts
and to construction workers, even though normal prescribed
wetting procedures are employed .
Although the project itself does not create a significant
adverse impact, the cumulative effect of projects in the area
will continue to degrade the air quality if measures are not
taken to reduce transportation system emissions. Local air
quality may have some long-term adverse affect on local
residents due to high carbon monoxide concentrations .
8.
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
-...., C. Water Quality/Public Health
D.
Water quality in the groundwater will not be affected by the
proposed project because of rubber gasketed joints in the
pipe design which will insure water tight joints. The
health of the general public will benefit from this project
as the proposed line offers a safe, reliable system and
back-up system for Districts Nos. 1 and 7. Sewage flows
from the project will be treated at County Sanitation
Districts' Treatment Plant No. 1 on Ellis Avenue, in the
City of Fountain Valley.
Ground water will be encountered in over half of the project
length. This will be dealt with either by pumping to the
sewer or a storm drain (see Mitigation Measures) .
Flora and Fauna
The flora of the project site in the southern section is in
an area of agricultural productivity. Construction will
have a short term impact on this. The project will have no
impact on the fauna.
E. Traffic
Persons who live and travel through the construction area
will experience some inconvenience during the construction
phase of the project. Once the project is constructed, the
general public will not be affected by the projects presence,
except for the periodical maintenance required to maintain
the proposed facility.
9.
-
-F. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources
~
The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse
impact on these resources.
-G. Population
The proposed project will provide additional capacity for ....
future development. Therefore, the project would induce an
-increase in population in the surrounding area.
H • Public Service ...
Indirectly, through providing capacity for future development,
-these areas will also be affected:
(1) Fire protection ...
(2) Police protection
(3) Solid waste collection
(4) Domestic water supply
-(5) Miscellaneous
I. Noise
There will be a temporary increase in noise level in the
-area during construction. Noise would also generally be
expected to increase as development in the area would occur. -
-
-
-
10.
-
-SECTION IV.
MITIGATION MEASURES
A. Air Quality
-It is likely that dust will be emitted into the air during
construction. This will be controlled by proper wetting
-techniques.
-B. Traffic
Local residents and traffic movement will be inconvenienced
for the duration of the construction period. Problems of
-traffic flow will be mitigated by construction barricades and
flagmen. -
C. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources
It is recommended that a trained archaeological observer -survey the project site. If, in the event that archaeological
or paleontological remains are uncovered during excavation,
work should be stopped and a qualified expert permitted to
-examine the site in order to determine the significance of
the discovery.
-
D. Water Quality -During construction groundwater is expected. The contractor
-will have the opportunity of pumping to the storm drain and
meeting the discharge requirements of NPDES Permit No. CA0106119
-or pumping into the new sewer as construction progresses.
11.
...
1.
SECTION V
REFERENCES
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Report on Sewerage Facilities
for the City of Santa Ana, June, 1965.
2. Boyle Engineering, Engineers Report on County Sanitation
District No. 1, November, 1969
3. Boyle Engineering, County Sanitation District No. 1 Facilities
-Planning Information, November, 1975
...
....
...
...
...
4. Ultrasystems, Inc., Bear Street Project EIR, May, 1976
5. Boyle Engineering, EIR Knott Interceptor, County Sanitation
District No. 3, July, 1974
6. State of California, Office of Planning and Research, Prime
Agricultural Land Report, 1975
12.
...
....
....
...
..
...
.....
ADDENDUM
SECTION·VI
ALTERNATIVES
The proposed project is needed to relieve the Santa Ana and
Greenville-Sullivan Trunks as well as service new development
south of Warner Avenue. A no project alternative would permit
capacity deficiencies in the tributary area to worsen causing
inconveniences and aesthetic and health burdens to area residents
and businesses as well as stopping development in the area .
During preliminary design of this project, several alternative
routes consistent with the requirements of drainage for the
specific area were studied. Items such as project cost, incon-
venience to schools, businesses, homes, etc., and traffic flow
problems were considered. This route was chosen because of
cost and being the least inconvenient over other routes .
13.
ADDENDUM -SECTION VII
ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS CONTACTED
---~
14.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD-
-~ 'ff A ANA REGION
6833 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 1
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506
-PHONE: (71.4) 684-9330
Q .
, ..
-
...
-
..
-
-
-
..
-
-
July 27, 1976
Mr. Dennis M. Reid, Senior Engineer
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Mr. Reid: Subject: Draft EIR -Raitt St~ Trunk
0
We feel that this draft environmental impact report has not
adequately discussed water quality impacts related to the
construction phase and to the growth-inducing impacts of this
sewer. The presence of high groundwater in some areas of coastal
Orange County has required dewatering with discharges to local
surface waters. Are such procedures anticipated for this project?
If so, does CSDOC intend to dischBrge these or other construction
wastes to its own sewerage system or to local flood control
channels?
The EIR notes that the project will "remove one of the limitations
to future developments", and potentially, impacts due to the
associated growth will occur. The effects of the additional
sewage flow on the treatment capacity of Plant No, 1 should be
discussed. The phasing of the trunk construction should be
related to present expansions of the treatment facilities,
We feel that the discussion of these impacts should be expanded,
particularly an analysis of the relative significance of the
accoroodation of population growth in the service area, It would
also be worthwhile to discuss the available alternatives, including
"no project", since they may affect the degree to which this
project will allow for growth,
We appreciate the opportunity to review this report, and hope
our comments will be worthwhile.
Sincerely,
I' ·' . \ ·'l A , ~vz,( "' .. 'ct//,,,,..[>~"'-
David J. Deckman
Environmental Specialist
DJD/ps
15.
..
....
....
....
....
...
..
...
...
RESPONSE TO REGIONAL BOARD LETTER OF JULY 27, 1976
On page 9 the Water Quality/Public Health paragraph has been
expanded to include the groundwater and dewatering problems.
The Contractor will have the option of pumping either to the
sewer or meeting the discharge requirements of NPDES Permit
No. CA0106119 while pumping to a storm drain .
With regard to growth inducing impacts, the proposed trunk
sewer was designed to transmit flows averaging 8 to 9 cfs,
based on the City of Santa Ana's future plan of land use.
Direct correlation of capacity to land use if difficult in
that proposed trunk will serve both commercial and industrial
areas, as well as overflow from other trunk sewers. Adequate
capacity is available in the County Sanitation District Treat-
ment Plant No. 1 to handle projected design flows .
In addition Section V has been added to discuss alternatives,
including no growth .
16.
-
-
August 17, 1976
County Sanitation Districts of
-Orange County
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA, 92708
Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Reid, Senior Engineer
Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) -Raitt Street Trunk
Gentlemen:
The City of Tustin Engineering Department has reviewed the subject
draft E.I.R. and has no comments regarding this proposed project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this report.
Very truly yours,
#~a(;~~
Bob Ledendecker
City Engineer
BL/dh
City Center Centennial at Main Tustin, California 92680
17_
(714) 544-8890
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C. J. SEGERSTROM & SONS
3315 Fairvie·w Road • Costa Mesa. California 92626
Telephone 546-0110
July 23, 1976
Mr. Dennis M . Reid, Senior Engineer
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P . 0 . Box 8127
Fountai~ Valley, California 92708
Dear Mr. Reid:
In response to your letter addressed to Segerstrom and Sons, dated .July 21,
1976, we offer the following comments on your proposed "Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report -Raitt Street Trunk -County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County, California."
Figure 1. (Page 2.) --Your map showing the Raitt Street align-
ment should be revised to reflect the true
and proper adopted alignment of Raitt Street.
Section II, Project and Site. (Page 3) --The statement, "The
Raitt Trunk, which is
located entirely in District No. 7, extends northerly from Sun-
flower Avenue to Alton Avenue and will carry only flow from Di.s-
trict No. 1 11 should be corrected to reflect that the Rai. tt Street
trunk will serve to sewer all of the land area tributary to the pro-
posed Raitt Street trunk within District No. 7, lying between Sun-
flower Avenue and Alton Avenue.
I have discussed these corrections with Conrad Honer, of Boyle Engineer-
ing, this morning and Mr. Honer assures me he will verify these corre.c-
tions directly with you.
Sincerely,
C • .Jj r. E. GERSTROM & SONS ldw_4R~
Henry T .\ Segerstr~m
bwt CC: Mr. Conrad Honer
Mr. .John Stevens
18.
...
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RESPONSE TO C. J. SEGERSTROM LETTER OF JULY 23, 1976
The map on page 2 has been changed to reflect the current
alignment of the proposed Raitt Street extension and on
page 3 the drainage area has been changed to read "will serve
all the land area tributary to the proposed trunk within
District No. 7
19.
-
..
-
-
CITY OF SANT A Al\JA
~. ~
/< ~.{::·;~~; \ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (714) 834-4938
.. ,-I
~ ,.
\''\ ~1~~J~.~,.2~:i /
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA • SANTA ANA • CALIFORNIA 92701
July 27, 1976
Mr. Dennis M. Reid
Orange County Sanitation Districts
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Mr. Reid:
SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER
The City of Santa Ana Public Works Department has reviewed your draft
environmental document for the proposed Raitt Street trunk sewer and has
only a couple of comments, both concerning Section II on page 3.
1. In line 8 -Allen Avenue should probably read Alton Avenue.
2. In line 10 -5,900 feet of 20-inch VCP. The map on page 2 does
not show any 20-inch pipe but instead shows 24-inch pipe .
._..., Thank you for the opportunity to review this draft report.
Sincerely,
-
J. Richard Smith
Special Projects Engineer
-
...
-
-
-20.
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
RESPONSE TO CITY OF SANTA ANA LETTER OF JULY 27, 1976
On page three, line 8 has been changed to read 11 Alton" Avenue
and on line 10 it has been changed to correspond with the
present sizing and lengths of pipe to be used.
21.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
...
-
-
July 28, 1976
Mr. Dennis M. Reid
County Sanitation Districts
P. O. Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Draft EIR for the Raitt Street Trunk
Dear Mr. Reid:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject EIR,
however, since the proposed project will not affect the City
of Irvine, we have no comments on the Draft EIR.
Sincerely,
/;;/~
TOM MINER
Planner II
MJO:dp
Irvine TO'Nn Center. 4201 Campus Drive, P.O. Box DZ, Irvine, California 92664 714/833-3840
22.
-
-
-
-
-
C>F
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY
H. G. OSBORNE
DI RECTOR
811 NORTH BROADWAY
SANT.A. ANA, CALIFORNIA
AUG 0 6 b1 o
Mr. Ray Lewis, Chief Engineer
County Sanitation District of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attn: Mr. Dennis M. Reid
Dear Mr. Lewis:
TELEPHONE: 834-5678
AREA CODE 714
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. BOX 4048
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702
FILE 245
This is in response to a letter dated July 21, 1976 that transmitted the Draft
EIR for the Raitt Street Trunk and requested comments prior to August 26, 1976.
The Draft EIR has been reviewed and no significant impacts have been noted that
relate to the County or its operation.
As a point of interest, we noted in the 2nd paragraph on page 3, that easements
need to be acquired for a strip of land 30 feet wide and approximately 3100 feet
long, lying in a southerly projection of Raitt Street between Sunflower Avenue
and Alton Avenue.
By coincidence our office is also reviewing a Draft EIR prepared by the City of
Santa Ana for the "Construction of Raitt Street from Sunflower Avenue to Alton
Avenue".
It appears that a potential savings to the taxpayer may be realized if the two
projects could be coordinated.
Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing the Draft EIR.
JEB:mlt
cc: City of Santa Ana
EMA Development -S ch\\rar ze
ESD Project File
Reading File
Very truly yours,
, ~--i ·'. / \ :( -, ' . ' -, ., __ ,, ~~-;-__ /
H. G. Osbcrne
Director
23.
. \.., __ _____
-
...
RESPONSE TO Er.'.i.A LE'l'TER OF AUGUST 6, 1976
Whereas the project will be completed prior to the construction
of the proposed Raitt Street extension from Sunflower Avenue
to Alton Avenue, the project is being coordinated with the
City of Santa Ana so that only one Right-of-way acquisition
will be needed from C. J. Segerstrom and Sons for the complete
street alignment.
24.
-
....
-
. .
...
Southern C2Jifomia
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
DISTRICT HEADQUAFHC:R:5
9-li.:> ?'EL.STAR A\iEl•vE ~L. MC'NTE CAL.IF0"1~1A. 917l1 • •213• .C.!J.)9JI
/1K',_l)EN,V1$ /-f, /?.£1.lJ
~.v,rµnC',J _J),-.f>r1<1ci5 It'/
Ot:AA/t;c Cotn .. rrf
P. 0, I :3t; X '61 :?-7
RivAJT-41N 'WJ.t..LL:. ( (lrf. f,2.Jt1f3
'
Existing Air Q·.t3.li ty in Area __ _
Project ~issio~G:
Constr•.:c:ion p!'iase _______ _
Co::i?leted project veh.icula= ____ _
Statio:iary (sa.s and elec::ric po"-1er usage)_
Project !~pact o:i Air Q::.ali;;y _____ _
Adt:iaus.te
x
NA-
r-JA
><
}CJ. Yes IJ No 0 Inco-i?lete
){Yes No Pat'tia.ll,y
.4v~t1:;-r M, 1':)7t
File r:c. C ttJ 72 t-o •
I=iad~c1..&:i.te
~ Not re::pirei
0 Require1
IJ B~:ieficial: will probably t~~d to i~pro~e A~
0 No effect c:i A~
O Z·by be req'Ji red, depe:ids
on ulti'.:1ate use
.tzl ':fill probably not h2:1e n s:.ibsta"lt.ial adverse
effect
Cl Adver.::;-?: '.!lay degrade air quality, to a .o;!gni-
ficant extent.
i) co:~!~.;~s o: ;,~:rc~~:;.:r~3,7 d;/g s&ee/5 mav 6e e,s<if'/,. ~s __ _
f?-q1!irC. '7?<:?nf, 1
Yes
If yo·J. h;i.ve a"ly f•.irth~r questions please call ['jC at (213) 443-3931, Ext.23·~
or To11 !bllins at Ext.241 •
Very truly yours,
J .. A. Stuart
Chief Ai~/.~r.ol Officer
Alan Kc .... taz~r /~
Se1br Air P;,~ 1.·1~i:i:t rbal:t·s::.
:I·~~!, I:~.p?.c ~. A:1:tlJ'.:> i.2 3~·c:i.u:i
l . ' (.. e ~1
\.Ir\ L. .l J V I \ I I -~ I j V I I \ I 1 J./ I 11 \ J..• \I
I t L _j .. ! _ -I
I A IR· CALIFORNIA
AIR QUALITY DATA
llLtUTANT Anaheim Costa Mesa STANDARDS fORHAT
1o't (G month$) \l0 months)
OXIDANT 0 .10 ppm Days l. 6 davs .!_1 d~
(OZONE) 1 hr avg. Hax. 2 • .23 ppm .18 ppm
-
:T.T~OGEN (11 mo.) (11 months)
DIOXIDE· 0.25 ppm Days 11 d~ 3 da1s 1 hr avg. lfax. .50 ppm .35 ppm (N02) -(LL mo.) (S months) l 10 ppm ?.±_days ]l__days ·cAR130:-.l l:~ hr avg. Days. 15 ppm 20 ppm
~mrn:noE -(5 months) I ':n Max. (11 mo.)
ppm 9 days Q d.~E (CO) J. hr avg. 27 ppm 31 ppm
U.04 ppm ~mo.)
SULFU'!"t 1 d~ 0 <lnys /../1 hr nvg. n~~ • 01.3 ppm .026 ppm .
DlO:GDF. --·-·-·-
0.50 Mnx. (10 mo.)
(502)
ppm
0 cl;iys 0 days 1 hr avg.
.1/. pnm .13 ppm
, ,, I 3 (11 mo.)
iUSPENDED ~JU ~1g tn AGH 3 ". 10lug/m3 7L.ug/m3. · AG~ .
~RTICULATE ·-··--111 mo.) LOQ ug /m 3 % over 4 . HATTER .57% 37% ,., .' hr Max. Zli 9ug/m3 177ug/m3 -·~I : avg. --... ---·--·'-• -
LEAD l.S u~/m 3
Honths5 ·
(11 mo.)
1\ rrr I c ULA TE) : ~ \. \ <lny nvg. ----7 months 5 months
M[lX. l;:=/7ug/m3 3.99ug/m3
J\ I R P 0 L L U T I 0 N E P I S 0 D E S
. Po llutunt
·O
s
D
c
.. ,.,
xic1.:int
li lfur
io~d<le
:l.t·bon
11nn~·:i<l!·
-
I
Criteria
0.20 I
o. J.5 I
a.so I
0.20 I
l10 I 1
?0 I 1?
(i:_pm/time) St~gc Numb or
J. hr 1 25
l nr 2 0
1 hr or 1 0 24 hr· 1
hl:' or 'l. 0 .
hr I '.
41•1\ ""'V'l.~4 1,1 I-••
I ~ --' ~ 1.-11 __. i.-1 ;___& --1 ·--·· -' -,_
l
M 0 N I
Ln Hu.bra
68 dD:ys
.28 I~pm
16 daE
.1~6 ppm
(6 months
12 days
15 ppm
(6 mo.)
0 days
38 ppm
. ·o days
.039 ppm
0 days
.13 ppm
lllug/m3
65 %
220u~/m3
7 months
4.58ug/m3
I
( ,.,, o·R·I NG s T A .. T I o·N S J. .. Cou~ty
El Toro Los Santa Ana San Juan Laguna wide
Alamitos. Canyon Capistrano Bench
l9 months)
56 days 51 days 122 clays 27 days -137 <lnys
.19 ppm .21 ppm .33 ppm .18 ppm .33 ppm
(4 mo.) (4 mo.) (1 mo.)
J clnys 0 <lays --2 day~~ ~days
.ltl ppm .16 ppm .35 ppm .50.ppm
(S mo.). ( 6 mo.) (9 mo.)
0 d~y_~ ~lay~ --]. days !~8 d:J'.LS
'5 ppm 12 ppm 10 ppm 20 ppm
\
(5 mo.) (b mo.) (9 mo.)
0 days 0 d.1~ --0 dayn 0 d~vs
8 ppm 19 ppm 16 ppm 38 ppm
(7 mo.) · (10 mo) (4 months)
0 days 0 d~ 0 days --ldays
.007 ppm .039 ppm .012 ppm • 011 J ppm
(7 mo.) (10 mo.) (/• mo.)
0 cbys ·o clays 0 d~R . --0 clay~
.OJ ppm .21 ppm .03 ~12111 .21 ppm
(7 mo· 1 (9 mo.~ (9 mo.) (9 mo.)
58ug/m 99ug/m 88 ug/m3 7Jug/m3 --
(7 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.)
Hi, 48% .. 49% -15% 43%
12lmg/m3 273ur,/m3 lls up,/m3 l61rnr,/m3 27Jllg/m3
(7 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.) (9 mo.)
0 months l• months '• montlrn -li months 7 months
1. 46ur,/m'. 5.85ur,/m3 2~1uid;J 3.3lur-i-;· S:-ffS-ui: /;n~ ... ** Corrected for ultraviolet photometric calibration.
1. Days -Nuinber of days s tnndn1·d equa llcd or exceeded
2. Max. -Highest value over nvcraging time
3. ACM · -Annual Geometric Menn
4. % over -Percent of samples over criterion
5. Months -Number of months ataridard equalled or
exceeded
(California Ambient Air Quality Standards a1'e not danger
Zevelo. These CU'e ZeveZs required to p:roteot puhZia health
wi Ni an adcquato mar1ain oj' nafotu.) 5-7-7 6
-·-·· --· ·--... • ' I' (I • --., -
l I I I .4 ' I l I t I ' ~ .. _______ ,..
t.'}11 ~.l -'
l'OLLUTANT
m:ID,\l'iT
(OZONE)
NITROGEN
.DIOXIDE
(1':02)
FEDERAL
AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
** 0.03 ppm
1 hr avg.
l
l
lo.05ppm
' DATA
FORMAT Anaheim
L (6 months)
D.:tys 2. 10 days Max. .23 ppm
annual
~vg.
·A I R ~ M o N I T . O : ~R 4 I N G S T A •. T I o·· N S
Costa Mesa La Habra
(10 months:
19 days
.18 ppm
83 days
.28 ppm
.f ~I '.
El Toro Los
Alamitos
72· days
.19 ppm
64 days
.21 ppm
Snntn Ana
Cun yon
135 days
.33 ppm
Laguna
Bench
Coun
Wid
149 de
.33 Pr
, annual nvg.
---~-------'--------+~--~--~-~~~----~-~~~~r--~~---r~----~1;----------1-----------r.-------+---------··'I ~11 months: (5 months) (6 months) (5 mo.) (6 months: (9 months) ·
I '·cARTION ' 9 ppm 5 l O 1 23 <l 0 cl 7 d l d 66 d 3 dnys f c nys nys . -~s __E;J_S --· ~s <1)
1 8 hr nvr; • 7 5 · 16 10 2
MONOXIDE
(CO)
35 ppm
1 hr avg.
D:i.ys 18 ppm 23 ppm 1 pp1:1 ..2-J?J2_m __ t-__ ._PI_>Tn_-:;------+-----· --l-1'--p;...;p:....m-.-i--3-.:...p.:....pn
Max, "11 months; (5 months) (6 months) (5 mo.) (6 months. (9 months 1
Q__dnys 0 days 1 dny 0 clays 0 days --0 dnvs ~
27 ppm 31 ppm 38 ppm 8 ppm 19 ppm 16 ppm 38 pr
I._. -----·--·------~-----f·-_;...;;.__-+-(-l-O-n-10_1;._1t_h_s~)-t------r-:-(-7-1-:10-.-:'.)-t-:(~O-m-o-. )~-t--:--(l~• _rn_o_n_t~h-s-:-)-i-----~----~----
0 .14 ppm Days Q clays _Q__j_~ 0 dnys .9 days 0 days_ 0 days SULFUR
DIOXIDE 24 hr nvg • Mux • . 043 ppm • 026 ppm · • 039 ppm • 007 ppm • 039 ppm • 012 ppm
0.03 ppm annunl
I (SO~)
l -annun 1 av~. nvg.
,~~~--·~--~~-~------+-------.__ ______ 1--------t-------f-----~-~----t---------1------·-----
I 75 ug/m3 3,·
3
(11 months) (7 mo.) (9 months: (9 months) (9 mon5hs
SUSPt:NDED AGM 3. AGM lOlug/m 74ug/m3 lllug/ml 58ug/~n3 99ug/m3 88 ug/m3 -173ug/m
HATTER
PARTICLJI_.An.: --·-·-----i-----t.------+------t-----+----1-----1------t------t-:-:-----1---
._,60 ug/m3 ··1
0
over4.
0
(1%
0
1 months) (7 mo.) (9 months: (9 months: (9 months 1
/r Q% 0% 0%. , 2% · '' 0% -0% Q • J%
2!1-hr nvg • Max• 249ug/m3 l 77ug/m3 220ug/rn3 124ug/m3 273ug/m3 218ug/m3 · 164ug/m3 273ur,/
.____~-~~~1~--~~--~~~---~~__._~--~---__;,;_;_ ____ , ___ ..;;.... ___ ,~~___;;.,_~t~~..;_~-t-~--..;;._---r----------i---~---1------
1
\1rtnROC.ARnm:s 0.24ppm D.:lys (5months) (6mo.) (6.months (7mo.
I ( COR!U~CTED 3 hr nvg. Mo.x. _:111 days --66 dnys 98 days ---169 <la
FOR }~ETHA~~l·:: (6-9 a.m.) 6 ppm 2 ppm 6 ppm 6 ppm
A I R P 0 L L U T I 0 N E P I S 0 D E S --11 0 llutun t Criterin (ppm/ time) Stage !lt1mbcr
0.20 I 1 hr 1 25
Ox 1d.:i1·, t i.---· 7 2 0.35 l ht" 0
Sulfo~~ o.so I 1 hr or 1 0
Dioxide 0.20 I 24 hr '
~--:1rbo:1 40 I 1 ht' or· 1 0
)nr··:'.' ,'. , /0 I 1? hr I
I
1. Daya·-Number of days standard exceeded
2. Max. ~ Highest value over averaging t1me
3·. AGM -Annual Geometric Hean
4. % over ... Percent of samples over criterion
· (Fede:riaZ Ambient Air Quality Standards are not dangel'
, ~level~~ 2~eae are levels. required to proteot publio health
.with ~!~ adequate margin of oaf ety.)
**' Corr~ctcd for ultraviolet photometric calibration ..
5·-7-}6'· I t
REL
JWS
REL
7/27/76
MEMO TO: JWS, FAH, REL, WNC, TLW
FROM: RITA
Documents, correspondence, etc. needed to complete pending resolutions and files:
Legal Description and Map re condemnation Resolution No. 75-143-2 for Contracts
2-14-4 and 2-14-5 (approved 10/1/75) (If no condemP..ationsrequired, need memo
to attach to resolution indicating this.)
Irvine Ranch Water District agreement re local sewer collection system within
176-acre area excluded from Annexation No. 39 (Resolution No. 75-94-7 approved
6/11/75)
Agreement with Security Health Plan re Specification No. I-010, HMO Prepaid Medical
Insurance Plan (approved 2/11/76)
Legal Description and Map re condemnation Resolution No. 76-36-3 for Contract
No. 3-21-2 (approved 2/11/76) (If no condemnations required, need memo to
attach to resolution indicating this.)
WNC/_ Exhibit "A" (map) to agreement with Southern California Edison Company re transfer
Q~~~~fl.!.1~,-~.;~~p~~s~ 1?wer Line. Also need Bill of Sale. (Reso. 76-54 a?proved 4/14/76)
,/'--FAfl/''.-Agreement wl:th-SCAG ~e participation in 208 Area-Wide Planning for South Coast Area
1
\, TLW . (Resolution No. 76-59 approved 4/14/76)
' _-/
--mfc/ 0&reement with Orange County Vector Control District re pilot production of
-~. mosquitofish at Plant No. 1 (approved 4/14/76) ·
(RELF' Amendment to J. B. Gilbert & Associates agreement for EIS re Treatment Plant
~J'~_ ... ./ Facilities Plan (Resolution No. 76-92 approved 5/12/76)
~~ ~~_./· Am~/~j;~~ }~cN~=-~ ~~_:~~~~,re JPL-ACTS Process (Resolution No. 76-98 approved
REL
REL
REL
REL
REL
REL
Memo advising which jobs Resolution No. 76-93 determining prevailing wage rates
to be paid by contractors was posted at
Executed Grant of Easement from Calprop Corporation re Contract No. 2-16-2
(Resolution No. 76-107-2 approved 6/9/76)
Exhibit "B"s (8~ x 11" Ja3;ps) for Grant of Easement resolutions from:
/ ,~··lf\ vFr_ank Vessel, Jr., et al. re 3-21-2 (Resolution No. 76-118-3 approved 7/14/76)
.\ ~nrietta Visbeek re 3-21-2 (Resolution No. 76-119-3 approved 7/14/76)
~ter to Rewes-Schock re emergency repairs to Interplant. Influent Interceptor,
Job No. I-8 (proposal accepted 7/14/76) ·: _ C.::>~l _t•_._'r ,.'(.~-.. -~\.. t= ,,,7~ ~
,j
Plans and Specs for Odor Control Blower for Diversion & Metering Structure (Phase I),
Plant No. 1, Specification No. PW-055 (Need to advertise and then will need
award recorn.11E:t ,,. ·:: .1. C!': ... , _ .
Plans and Specs for Installation of Knott Interceptor and Ellis Tru:1k Sewer Int~r
connectio11, Specification No. PW-056 (Need to advertise and then will need
award recommendation frcm General Manager)
•... --..
JNS
~
FAH/
JWS
REL
REL
-----·--~ --~.. .u~
Letter to NIWA transmitting Resolution No. 76-130-5 and District No. S's share of
1976-77 budget--$5,000 (approved 7/14/76)
:-Amendment to NIWA agreement providing option for each member agency to appoint a
second alternate to Board of Directors. (Resolution No. 76-124-5 approved 7/14/76)
-'~ <..~_..._,._..~ •.,...:.'., .i((.._.-'"'-~'\.Y"'<........_.._I-_,,._(_~..,.•_::.· .... ~ \,.'t'T_"_~·, r'· ;,,,·_ (" r_--.·-• \.-... ·\
Letter to City of Brea/Chino Basin Municipal Water District re participation of
District No. 2 as lead agency in obtaining a Step 1 Grant for Facilities Plan and
EIR re Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drair:age area. (approved 7/14/76)
Letters soliciting engineering proposals re Feasibility Report and EIR for
Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon area (authorized 7/14/76)
-· '-._,._> .... • .... :' •
JWS Letter to LAFC transmitting Resolution No. 76-131-7 authorizing initiation of
proceedings re Annexation No. 55 -Ridgeline/Lazy B Annexation to District No. 7,
and transmitting other necessary information and fees. (approved 7/14/76)
~~\-\I. I q? ([. :t~~~ _.._,_\°
~ ' ~ S i.: ''-"-i;,__ . --~·-<--c; ~_:.,__ .;:i\(C. -v--\c <l cf a ... -'-'-'"'""-~ 1.--u. 3 · ..) I , <
~---~=-. f l~\--;_, .. ~\r l.'-1 r~ Ii-'o, -~ --\::\.&.~ Lt"-._ ··c LL~\(_•<'-"~\ ~r ""-
~ \._ (-'t~ ... ~-tu/ DC[\:."> X~lllli~•~'--' 1
' " v
LA/ D \\ !\ l*\ Lee_,,~. v
Q,~.,,.S) . .>.r<-.I<-.-.-\r-·to /\.Jt\~)>. \XJ<x·•·",,,J' ~-15, ~-c~ L---
()... 0 ...... ,,,,_. ot
\ .. ~ .. ~"~~-'~·-~ ... L~~-..\--~ ~ ._ ~:_ ~r-~y...-\r ;.._;;_ r ·7_:;-1 ~<...;;~ 1.-V<.>-"2.~~...-'\....<__.
\,j
~
• i . -~@) :. ~l..r ~t~~S\_ND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING BUILDING
ADDITIONS AND REMODEL -JOB NO. J-7-3
In August, 1975, the Building Committee was appointed to study
oc,.} ·(-~{'.I l rA),-< r ;· en7t1.c.R (7.jf,~·'.' :.,~t_.vti-.t-<;-t-·4--'
the currerit,A.nbeds of -\:he Distriet:~·relative to possible enlargement
of the Board Room, comeletion of the second floor of the
-'({\. A,W<-tfA ' tl ' ' • (' l.A.J""VV' t..
Engineerin_g ,.Building and additional office space in the Admini s-
·~ ~~0 l.t., ~~ Jr-y
tration Buiteing. After se~eral me~~4:>e~wee.n the staf~ and J,,.
' ~{_,, ~
the .J3u~ lding Coijlffii t tee~ ~h~~rnd }J>y ~. )lorman Culver! the £.:i.ncrT /t~J.,~~--J ~J..v.., P OJ-//c1, .. fwl f ~ f~ {~..,~ Ql·W
.. QODG@pt ~-pre5€mt'5d··· td lt}2g·{.·.~.&re9tors __ at th~ir ~' 197.6 :cs .~a .;v.J ~ ,;t;/j t..Jfa-. ~t ·vu--_,./ ,,../-.. "11
'-r~.I .
~et in g . I\ Th~ f i na 1 concept , ~-:!!W..._.,~_U!i°""""~l,l.~.e=a::::br= ... ::i:. :(ty';8'· :-:·tl="fih'.0e-~"TiLJr+t..,.r~ene•!!•~!'l"':rs~s~, has
approximately 3500 squ~re feet of useable area in the building
which includes increasing the Board Room from 1140 square feet
to 1800 square Jeet. This project ~"s'~~~}~e 1976-77
L---\t-. ~.J-
budget €l.:t $300,000. It is recommended that ~ bids be received
f.or this prgjoct on/October 12, 1976, with possible award at
the October Board Meeting. Construction could hP scheduled to ~-j;7-
cornmence November 1, 1976 with completion1in1May, 1977.
\
C-QNS!DfaoTIQtJ OF AWARD OF SPECIFICATION NO. PW-053, PURCHASE OF THIRTY-TWO
(32) DIGESTER DOME HANGERS
Bids for the purchase of 32 digester~ome hangers,were received on August
31, 1976. Three bids were ~ranging from ,,ai low of $15,508 to a
high of $17,280. It is recommended that~ award be made to Production
Steel Co., Inc. of Carson, Cal ifornia{tr the low bid amount of $15,508
for al_l i terns contained i ~ the proposal ;f, (,._ ,.,._,_, / t r rn·IA.<>~ ~IA,· ~-¥-cl),lU-.)e tL .{.i ...... ~ e...v..e ,,4_.;~~' I ru \_) 0 ~ ' J.;.v"~
u
'Phis tteltl appearing Oft-'fou:i; agenda ist apf'±ova'l--ef. Addenda
Nos. 1 and 2 for Job No. J-6-lD, Addi ional Pumping Facilities
for the Foster Outfall Booster Stat· Plant No. 2-'il?!ke8c
iailienda change the bid date from A gust 31 to September 7th to
allow additional time for t~con ractors to prepare their bid
w ~' (f ti :'1~-G
proposil)apd}several technical c arifications which were
~~:tea b~he prospective bid ers since the project was
advertised. A~aff recorrunends ap roval of these addenda.
NOS. 1 and 2 TO SPECIFICATION NO.
for th& co~tractors to preparQ
technical clarifications
~~~~~~
approval of these addenda.
by the prospective
recommends
)(~
CHANGE ORDERATO{PW-047
·Jb6~-
\J
This change order is to extend the contract time
35-days. The contractor obtained and construct new molds for
this project which included new fiberglass du work at Headworks
"C" ventilation syst~lant No. 2. The e new molds enabled
the_cop~~actor to merQ easily comply with the job specifications
. P.··11'"'•
and/to produce a better quality of duct work than required.( r,t ..J--d rd ,,~ &-..I rl ,,.J. . • /~L,u_~ )
Staff recommends acceptance of this c ange order~extending the
)
original contract time f rorn 180 days to 215 days
/.P( j"b I,. \to. 0-? C,V.r,1 l C ,i
Accept~-)ff'~PW-04 7 ~ Fieer13la~~ 0-u?:t liiprk: tor Headwo:r:-ks "C" ir§Sh .... ,IA..~
A.i.r Vent j lation--Sys·tem
.f' ) le l I r;+~;~~.,
The contractor~has satisfactorily completed all the specified work
!
for this project and has complied with al.1 the contract requirements.
StaffArecommends acceptance of this joQ,.1 ~-action appearing
~ ~ . '
on yue"dl: a.gend.aJt authorizes '~ filing of· the Notice of Completion-OA..--'2
~d~'. ,. ,{! ~ -;;ti" !'Ju: i ~,ri.. -I !-, w , , .//
/
/
'
~\AJ
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO/PW-052
At the August Board Meeting,fcontract was awarded to Instrumentation
and Mechanical Systems, Inc. of Fullerton for ttre installation of
-fk~ I
seven automatic gate operators atAPlant No. 1 Diversion and
Metering Structure. The contract, in the amount of $22,688, is a
small contract anfuthe staff inadvertently included in the specifica-
tions for this~~~~J,.11Jance requirements in the amount of $3 million
IA_v:; which are the limii:;s ~or a majo~11 contract. The contractor
.\_,,,,5,r~.-t._,J;:i / c--•• _,J..t<.,.<-~' ·· _d . A ty:A, f(~-<.htt ~ · , ~---~
/s~d his hid based ~6n Supply~ -efl:eBermal $1 million /J . .J //_. AA. .(I ,4'{.• ~
. 'i.J
i ns 1 irancQ ;r;Q'!lairQmeai: fer a j ee of this magnitilci~·r-t.he£-erore, -i-t
-:tt.R. is tAQ staff's recomrnendafion that t~ change order be approved
...at no cost to the n; stl;ict.s to reduc~t'.he arsom:i-t:. o! insurance
~'9:/-
required~from'--$3 million to $1 million.
#'~ ACCEPTANC:~ ~JOB NO. J-9-2
I
This ~~aet to provide for 1 an extension of .B'brge ~er Jdi.2 on
(t1 U/.l A,,~...i "'" '
the 120" ocean outfall ~e:::f"" eomplete. 'fhe SC;lAtractor :Ra.•
~ '4.-<.-<-e" -l ~ . , (._ ~-"-,, e.I
completed 1'all the requirements ~ the contract and staff
recommends acceptance of 'this project. The action appearing in
the agenda authorizes the acceptance of the job)a:H-d filing of
the Notice of Completion ~ . ~ (;, , c J{~A ?/t '-/J ~ c... ~
\
ATTENDANCE AT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS goNGRESS AND EQUIPMENT
~
~ International Public
(} Lt·,.lr • , . -t, I -C • • {}>)' r ;· . · -· '-1nterest1ng 1sess1ons along
.:L, \ .. ~'"'
~have proved t~.--b.~-----~~!_:emely valuabl to t:.!?-.~ Districts in planning -----·--. ··-----~--.. -... ~,.··-·--·-··--_... ·--:;:,;;-;· .. :,r ~
for future construction programsr~ he Dlstricts'.Chief Engineer
has b~eH attend~t~se:c:~tti~~~~in the past, as well as
fr, ~ti? A--li l.c,c,f/
; a SHOW A!l' LltS VEGAS, SEPTEMBER 2 6 -30 • / u U,w.i C< ,
I L-~ lJi i;. {~/ 'E:_'; ~ <) l
....-r-,, '~f
Works Confe nceAhas sche~~led several
wi thtmanuf acturersl'~·j'bi ts, whi~{J.J...v. ...-· i).
Civil Engineers11 It is j~
_,.(_ ~J(l_._ C( { ) c .. 1J~
recommended that the Boards ~14!fl~~·~ ~he Joint ~ha;Fman and
if ) ~(( r<.. ~J'.~,..._\CAA./;pLcc..,-1
meetings of
the Chief Engineer_~tteDd -m~~'E.~S--SiR.ge-~~protr;i,de'\:. .-~:~
'an excellent forum for discussi ~ ' ~ e
~~
:; \:
.,_ ~·
.-:.~..-~ -k' '
-~~ ~? ~ j
-· , ,..,,,
.....
":.
~
~ r
"""'.-=:::::::'
(-·~
. .,.. ~·
'!"'.
('\
;.,.
I ~ I ~ ,z{.'l'L .-
Authorization to Negotiate1Purchase of IUse~· S~±~~~e~9ffe--i1~Ja::mu~l~i""Ang Trucks~~~
/ (J
i
l ;
Included in this year's budget is $350,0QO for solids handling
I
and disposal equipment. A portion of t~is budget amount was
I
anticipated to be used for dump traile1is and tractors for
hauling of centrifuge sludge to dryinJ areas at both Plant ,1si ,i:es.
11
•eA a-e/c.mall dump trl..Auc' Ovs',o..AC/la<n1.tdL~t,,h.t.ety•··(··.'1..<.;J,,.. /} 'F-t:Yfi~ee--ee~x:'li:1:S>1Lt::1~· Il'tt<:Jg-ee~qf-\U~ii.:tp::l.lmmee.on.tt~b~Q~l:l:1° BR-g~"tlu~ol"e'f:aH-~:r. ~1 :tt 11 f
are rapidly approaching the end of their useful life.
l
In an attempt to find equipment ~~·g--be suitable for hauling
J
of wet centrate sludge, ,which contains approximately 80% water, the
~/\J.) I'.' . • ... Jo '.J, 7-f I
staff has ~ried ~~(al methods which included dump trailers,
dump trucks, ;.~·,-~,~·~l~~~-:~.~;~,fx concrete trucks. This
latter method/proved so successful that the staff is recommending
the purchase of two used eight:yard transit mix concrete trucks for the
'
purpose of handling the c.enti:-~te sludge at both Plants. ~e staff
I
~~lecated1'hree sources of lsu~ply/that specialize in this type of
~-·"t l .. ,_,, te-ht,.,'.
used equipmentf1and~~ extimateti that the cost will not exceed
(.A ,'---J;.., ...
$ 9, 0 0 0 per unit ,1 e,Jf-cius-iv~of applic~ble sales tax. _ ~.;~.~~;. f.~h~re,
recommended that the Gener:al Manager be authorized to,Aawa-rd. a pu~chase
. 'V /J A I 4 /) ~1 ,·
"'oraer for two used eigh t·-yard transit mix truck st\ in an amount not
to exceed $18,000 plus applicable sales and use taxesr
~1:1 ·1~.-
eoNSIDERAtioN<OF ACTIONS RB~ PURCHASE OF ATOMIC ABSORPTION
.'
SPECTROPHOTOMETER /
/
tU ~i l-,, ·tL . A
Included in the 1976-77 Budget'\~, '~purchase of an A.:tomic ,;r _ ~
~sorption ,lepctroph,, otolj\eter. for usi by the laboratory~"'" i!.'-'
Ai.A-i ~ wrr~t.f / implemen~--1industrial waste monitoring program . .i:-R an amount
'"'f.A~~e s~< .
Qf $g,§40. Our presentlatomi~absorption spectrophotometer was
manufactured by Perkin-Elmer Corp. of Santa Ana,'fMQa1l JQi)a
'IliJlie-laboratory personnel ~ave evaluated several comparable
instrurne~ts and have determined that ~he P~fkin-Elmef ~1fde~ 307-~ ~.lr ~ ~l.~'t .J j,-tr:4vJ'fL,,f W-.At.t I
will \f±±O~a greater fle~~_!Vland/i~~~-l~Hy of u
component,~·a~ i11Strumen.t. i_n_:t_his pdce __ .i:~~g~?
This additional i..nf9trument will allow the laben?a-i=m:=y 13eroennQl to
analy~~ heavy metal_s a:r:dAtoxi~ contam.\nents in the industrial
...-1,..,·'-, ~ \-,_ ""'~it . .e-. , (...(,"-.t:t;' ~.fn~c.,t.A. t , e. ... t f
waste te-ai de j n the i mpl emept~;R. of the Indus_v ial Waste
Ordinance. Our present atomic absorJ?t{on ~s used principally /~(--~'-f .... l)
for monitoring the wastewaters~iift ~NPDES Permit requirements.
It is, therefore,, reco. mrq, e_ nd$ that the General Manager be authorized
1 ,... r .. ·. -~ . ~ W"--VI e '· ft 1 ,~ r: ' ,• ' 1 ._ . l>
-Eo i=ie13etia L6 the p. ~r~fiaB~J°f tft.io ins~rnment. wi'&h lerkin-Elmer Co, rp fr:. ~t ,_H~ .... t,-<..e, i ~ ~ .J.....J 30'7'4 at;.v.A..: a ~! . _,,--·l'c:~ · i P e..c-/_ . ,
of Santa Ana l<Y'f ~~~mount~~t to exceoQ $8, 500 plus applicable /' ,~,
sales and use taxes and freight charges. ~~:
I ~
. r :i
I l f -·_ .,_ f. __ f_,... f •. '
-.. . \. \.lo
I PURCHAS.E OF IN-SEWER SAMPLERS FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE MONITORING PROGRAM
The staff.has evaluated several commercially available wastewater
samplers which can be installed in 1sewers for the purpose of
monitoring the sewer system and the industrial waste contained
/
therein. After a thorough evaluation, it is recommended that
the staff be authorized to negotiate with ISCO, Environmental
Division of Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of purchasing
~. .f..c ,t4.-11-·~" , ~. ~t.J .• i.~ , .f'~ : ( o-i .. w ( .
eleven wastewater samplers_,~or a maximum amoynt not to~exceed
/I '.! '."'L ' ·,. ; ~r'\,A.·'-fl"Jl ( t ( ,'
$15,000, exclusive of tax and freight.( Approximately $16,5,.00
('-f ?·<.AA..-·.,)' b--.
was budgeted this year for samplers and flow meters ~ the r
.'l"\I , . , ·~"'t ... t·:· .....
Industrial Waste JJo~artlftertt-'fkse S&lf(~loi;a a.re rQq11 i reQ-to
~L '\t&.X·.1
implement ou:t/~ industrial waste monitoring program.
No . 8 -m -Authoriz·i ·ng· Pur'ch'a·s·e· o·r Emer·g·e·n·cy Bypass ·piping.
Included in the approved1"7 6r77 budglt, is an item in the
I
amount of $4,427 for purchase o f 12-inch aluminum pipe and
couplings for use in temporary emergency bypass operations .
Our purchasing division has solicite for said piping
and determined that only one source of supply is available for
said piping which is compatible w~th our existing equipment .
It is therefore recommended thaj the Manager be authorized to
issue a Purchase Order to Po~~ Irrigation Equipment Company
~cquisition of approxima,ely 600 feet of 12 -inch aluminum
(. pipe and couplings for emerrency .byp ~n the amo;;nt-of
$4' 964. 97 . -\~~ ---
,;"v (~ r J
AUTHORIZING I INCREASE IN SALARY /FOR CHIEF OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE
Mr. John Thomas, Chief of the Industrial Waste S ec tion, has
recent ly received notification that he has successfully passed
the State examination for r e gistration in civil engineering .
In recognition of this accomplishment, we are recommend ing that
Mr . Thomas be granted a 1/2 step increase in salary . This
1 ~ re comme ndation is consistent '.-t{j.h ~~ion for other members
of the Eng ineering Department who have successfully pas sed this
This action appearin ~on your '\.
Cd ~ c_ ~ 0-""3. /y -;; 1Ci 13 )
ag e nda reclassifies Mr. Thomas' posi t i~n from Range .9J,.A Ato 1
Range '°t4(I-ip-r1 ,.Juf YI-v7 ) p/r ¥_,_J,.,__ I "IV., f ~ h
State registration exa mination.
I Y L b 'J ~ \ ~ j I L~ -. -~ -1' i t t t t-~' -... --. l -+---1 tJ 1 l __ ·--t)·(lPv( , : ,:_) _J.·-~ D ~ r' _, Iii -~ _J _ --~--~-! ~, ·--r 1
1 I 9t/" · ft c 1 •?.. :~v ~-,~ i/JiFl!J 1 1 "'VYY>~ ~ "' 0 _ '
1 _j__J_ ~ __, . l -' t + .. l--L 1--r-I --l I t-
i I I I I I I I I I br~~~U??. ,J:'")r1 1 11 ~(v tr) -~??) ~ ) '7 ""Mi '!'?-1 P>yt>-~ i ,~ :M[ -----L . \ j /j f l T ---o+--t-r -l + -t -T " -H '~
I I k ' I I I . . ) I I I /J I trtl
ii r -. . 0'1,1'1r77W j -~j/-~~?J 1~t'.1J.?if-YPp~ ff 1 ~1 .iµ,M--~JG .,·irr-tr: ~ 1 ._ -~ --/ t7 ·.,£-· I . I r l ·'~~-i~r~ ~2..,~~p--1-·-i . ('~
---1 .. ~ t to -• -, -+ Y .. I ,j , 1 --+-j _ t-::;+
I I : : ,1 I I ', ' I I I J
. I fi··~~ ~'~-1#,? / {l~,_,:u;f~r '._iJ J.,,,Ol l " '.', · •, ~,,1;2 f
+ 1 t--t -+ -! . j. -A r +;I ~ + ---• t-~--l...., n JP -~ r ,, t • t I' ! : /) · ' ~ "Iv · I ' 1 I ' I ~~, 'i""i?.Y ~ / '?·~...,. ~ VFJ1 11" t::i . ·I~'. '.t"' I?': ; ..,,.,,, r-1711 ·
t + . f) ---I • _.l I 1 l ,~ r ~ .. ;,..,_ J : .,-J-...;o I ~ & w ,,,,g>-?P;i:> ~ ,..,.,,,,-Jl?',J/ ·:1>~~ ~ r \J *t ·1 t / . l .. I .' • • • 117 L !; y /7 , • • t __ + r
. yf ~;'.:+__r,r.,,.,,,,Ji.P +b~ f A'iJi?-J]~.7 ~/{(Jfr/1 v ~ ,,)~
11· · 1-t t 7 . t l • + 1--1 r:.. II 1 G ;./ .,I . ,.. c?\ -d ') 1 ~~ t II' I
• I 1,1 f l \ :>~I:;.: . -z,..{ '(./ $ -v -_... I "110 I
x..,.,,, \Y'""';1'./ ~Jf' -h41 r~~1r; ?·i~ r,:;J•>J?J77 <~'Pi·"' ..,n )+;,i i!f
/ I if' --..'7fj • • l j • (' :& 'I' e ';' -~J. I d. I • V'·'/ · I I • ~ ;,,;)17 'i "'l (I t7 -/t..O ~ ' ' I I n-. u ,~.,~,,,o/ ~ ; ('1_{)/'I 71;,i ~ -~ 6./>PJ ~·f't'?1 ·• -~ ~•-·-L ·-.~ . J -"C.V °' 1 . ·It . -¥ ' i . I I : I ' ' ?. I I ~ I r I + .. f I l . -t -T t • l . . !. ~ + • -.. • t ~-I
I ' I I I I I : I t . .. + + ·: 1 ~ I • l ! + ... + .. ~--;J..;\ .,.?A1 j ~ -T -' · 1 , -. rt?-. -. : t I , , -r--o : -. ' . . ! 1 ll. ·u:-'j-:I-ft -i . i
r .... q.,u· :n-+v·{l~/) :~ ,..,/._ ~ (:."'-'i/ J.-:' f?J ' ,,i;f-1i,.,-y1;,,1.J.073V I
+ -'T -i r/ ... f ~ I t I . I 1 JI ; ~ . ~ ''Y)f'f'J " +. il . ---il u ~ ' I -~ I
I : I ~f! . , I ~, I . -.'::;--~-r"Yn/ J-\1/:J "»-:n"J·,ii~tP~i'I??. 4.'l f?ji 7~--;p;j ~I,> +-,--, , ~ °"Y'Y' . r . . \ . ·1 Y ' ,, 1~ ?-~" . ..,,...o~'# • I , r • .. ~ • l /7 ~· -t . ;-1 -• r ·1111'~'/1~~1~ P.'~r ~. r-if1'r:~~:~'T4t~-t 71 ¥ ~;,r ~~J).! 1?' "/' ) -,. 1 !)~ • .,-h ·-~~-..,..""""~ ;t· -:[--i ~~ l I I . I ~, r 'r.11/ 7f1 /_ • I ····vv -f~")V;,,, ... -,.1 ~ v ••• ..,..,17''-'l'I j . I\ ! " • • · , ,~,.JI
--·-~ T t l : ? + -tr -r t · 1 . I • . t : t ~ I -I~. -1 . .
~ 1 ,
1
Y. . . 1 I -.-7-~ I j 1 :?'l.. 1 r , f t ¥-,
1
·
1 j :dr~ 'pn -fu~ I ~ .f ··.r MnL -<?? ·ifJf' r--~~I ~ ~ v. . -r r I · i tr~ jf, ff ~ Yr' r r . ! -.. .' 7 -
I I I j I I ' I --~~wt:;~-. )~ l u~·-?<ir ~~· . ~ -~~--/, ~ fi~ 1£7J... ~ J --,,.,. . ,. I '/. , 'i .. '1 •??'1 i ~,' n--J. ' ~ • 1 } If • ' I ~l=lj ~ l r /' /J ~ -~ -T -:.! --. l -' .. -' -r ., • ~I -I --L_ . -
I I ' I I I I I , • .... -~ t .j. -r-_J +---~ + .. I ' • _J --; ~ ~ . I -+ _J_ -+-L-1 t r-·r--:---+-I I
-I ' I I I I I • _,_s:~ 1 ~/.-'-v;::tls~J.-J~ 1 .rv~~u ·i>'tf-f'ir9~ ~ O/>"Z? · ~M ' -.t-~.-=?0~91 (r€) 3 · :
• ---4 ---· -r t ----~ -.. -L ~ -t---J_ -t-. -r l -1' . ·-I ~ 4 1 -.-. ,
I '. I j_ --l _ ~ '. : -1 --I -L I -. I l l ~ I J j '. ! ! I I l -l I I
I
-
-t-• I
-t 1
_I
I
t-
j t
I
-1----------4--'---·
• t-l
I
J
I
~ t-
I
j l
i----+
I I I
t 1
L
I I ..
l ~ ·-,-
I-_j
.._ +----+---
r
~ L
I
J_ }--t
I
I .
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I 1 I
.. I • "l
I
I
I I
I
I I I
1 . t I I I l
---
I~
l -I i I
I
I J
I ~ I
f I
I
+
t
I
+ -
+ +
I
1 t I J t-1
t-j t-
I I
L
I
I I -·--.-~
•
---r--I .
+-t
I
I •
I I l
I
1
l lu ~ '+ ~l.(_ ~A-~' t;''d~ J~,t-
(1.-L-
ACCEPTING GRAN T t OF EASEMENT FROM ERNEST BRYANT E'l' AL RB~G
2-14-4 a.nQ.~4=5 SAN TA ANA RIVER INTE RCEPTOR r eti-1A .. t{.[I:., 1 -1{'1.j ~/."J,,-lf'J
The District's staff, consulting engineer and General Counse l,
wo rk i ng within the guide lines of the appraisal prepar e d for t he
Santa Ana River Interce ptor, have conclud~d the n egotiations
for the ri gh t of way for th e permanent and temporary easement s
fo r the Santa Ana River Interceptor from Yorba Reg iona l Park to
the Green River Golf Course (SAVI Pre~er~J4-The permanent
easeme nt is 30 ' in width an.Q. a pG,t:.t,.;i..G-H-e·:E-4::-lTe-e@&t-e-~h-is .4e...:P
property ow ner for the -removal and l oss of production of b'6.-~
citrus trees , ~.Gi-J?e&-i:-&Fa.-t!-~e n <::lf~i~f;'i.g.a;t ioR-:f"-a:c i :I:± ties~
aQd other etls.i;--:b-R'f3 -impro~frts ·, in addition to the compensation
for the temporary use of the construction easement and the
permanent use of the sewer easement.
. () .J.1 r-t_ tJ µ,1-Jt . t· } !J_, Or u_~, r-zJ ~ v~ °"'{( .,,, ,.y . U' ~ c..
~taff recommendsf' acceptance of t.h .hs_., Grant of Easement and
A paymeo~~;t'; t..f')-,c ~ D :Ki~ the J?emnei;i.t.....and-i?em~~-a-s-em~s-
~1 a (t c ( t" , .. 1r I _.
set forth in 'Ghe doc4:tme~prepared j and approved by Genera l
Couns e l. I
/
ri Li~{J-)~)
~ \)~ CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 7 , B, 9 and 10 TO CONTRACT NO. 2 -14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
~
These four change orders conclude the additional work ,~odifications
to the specifications for ~completion of this major reach of
the Santa Ana River Interceptor which extends from La Palma Avenue
and Imperia l Highway to Gypsum Canyon.
Change Order No . 7 , in the amount of $1 ,423.82 , is for waterline
utility interferance and for the relocation of three manholes as
requested by the Yorba Linda County Water District to better
accommodate future connect i ons anticipated to serve their local
~;~
9! sewer system.
Change Order No . 8 , in the amount of $8·, 320 , is for/re~tal costs
sustained by the contractor as a result of delays i{~oordinati cllifl
~cheduling of the contract work for the Yorba Reg i ona l Park
and this Reach of the Santa :·Ana River Interceptor . The District's
contractor was directed to proceed on a basis of a proposed
schedule by the County 's Environmental Management Agency which,
because of circumstances beyond the control of t he EMA, they were
unable to meet. The cost of this extra work is for standby of
the rental equ i pment n ecessary to construct the interceptor
through the Yorba Regional Park . ~ ~ ~~ 6 b,~u LrJI
Change Order No . 9 is for additional costs ~incu rred by the
contractor while boring at the intersectio n of La Palma Avenue
and Imperial Highway because of encountering a low sewer of the
City of Anaheim which was constructed to a grade different than
what was shown on the as -built plans of the City ,~f ARaheim .
Change Order No. 10 is the normal change order for the adjustment
of the engineer's quantities of the actual work performed.
This change order is for a net deduction in: the amount of $2,953.
o/It should be noted that all change orders /have been approved
I
/
by the State and that the grant program will pay their proportionate
share of this additional cost. ~~t~l change orders for this
project are in the amount of approximately $79,574 which is less
than 2/10 of 1% of the original contr~ct price. Staff recommends
acceptance of these change orders, tptaring a net ad~·~he
K?
contract of $13,598ft.
I
This contract for the installation of the Santa Ana River
I
Interceptor from the intersec,tion of La Palma A~en ~ anc:t-nn
Highway , which spans a distance of approximate] J-G.61-'10 +1 ""'-"-----
·feet is complete and the contractor has complied wil:h-a-~1~~--
/
provisions of the contract . r ork has been inspected by the
District 's staff and consulting engineer and all requirements of
the affected property owners/ (Ernest Bryant, et al; Santa Ana
Valley Irrigation Company; f i ty of Anaheim) have been met. The
contractor has diligently prosecuted the work and has completed
this contract 142 days aheah of schedule . The State Water
Resources Control Board ha / inspected this i nstallation during
the course of construction and has verbally commended the
contractor and the staff for the completion of this Regional
Interceptor Sewer. Staff l recornrnends adoption of the resolution
included in the ag e nda ma l erial authorizing filing of the Notice
of Comp 1 et ion .0 t:¥ LGc ¥" _ ' -;/,,,... ,/ (!,t ., ,.__:f C'( ( .U.· · {
\ )
'
~ .-.~
,.1 i. :'I ~· ("l '
* ,.,: . ' o,..i.. ~
RECEIVE, FILE AND DENYfPROTEST,OF CONTRACTOR REGARDING CONTRACT
NO. 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN
The contractor, in performing the work for ~ installation of
the Yorba Linds Force Main, was directed by the staff to comply
with the specifications to back-fill certain areas excavated
within the street right of way within certain time limits to
I
mitigate the impacts on t',fi?fr commercial developments within the
City of Fullerton. The contractor was instructed to cease
f;:~~i~;;~-~f th~~i~ oi Efte inail'l liRQ force main sewer
until such time as the back fill operations had been successfully
completed.
l
The contractor has filed ,~ claim in the amount of $67, 960. 85 (_ ·
I f')i~ '{1~ C),l._ .. ~ <.k.1
I : (
for costs incurred durin1g this "shut-down" Aoperation. I &taff ~ , .
has denied the contrac~or's claim and)in accordance with
Section 8-4 of the Standard Specifications for this contract,
l
the. contractor:. is _filing a f~rm_al protest ~. the "gasiQer;itj on
.. .._ .J{ ' . , . ~ ' ~ q . .. . ( :,. .. ' e
~the Board ;~--f>±rectoi:-s..._ Copies of tl;le contractor's claim
I A~,_;
and the Chief Engin~er's denial of ~ claim are included in
I ~ · t ~d -·· -11 e~ .. t~
your agenda mat~ri~l: 7! ,. ~·.!;. (.~ ~: ... ,; •
1
• , -.· (,.'t' ~J :' / ~
; . \ I • . I .·~ ! ( • . . •• "1 I ) . ~ ... t ./ ~ . ! : I . ' : c ' ,,,.
;'. .\ , f ~ t': I J' ( ) 1 fJ L
'·
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 3-8R-l -_M.AmWLE REPLACEMEN'I',
.LOB ALAMI'fOS ~U:BTRUNR-. f
LAL-#"';
This change order i~ time allowance oE68 calendar days•for .tMe · /
/} ~vc?.
IJi.nhole i<splacementle:Ji ~ Los Alamitos Subtrunk. The contractor~~
delays ~ due to lack Of availability ane aela:ys in aeliYery
~ ~~ '1l-_... Ji
of specified materials for th-is-~ject. '.Wri:S. project is 4;.A-e "u/'
replacement of two manholes GA t:Re Le!! Alamitos anbt;r;Qn]ic and the
k • h 0 0 I~:.. 1 contractor was wor 1~~ at.. t e D~str~ct s convenience to rep ace
--tk \NW.., ~ y ~'\l~ .• ,J
~ manholes/\and tg Otl!!L&in operation of the sewer system-a&
<H.ree~es. Staff recommends approval of this change order for a
time extension.
I
~c
ACCEPT~ ~ JOB NO. 3-8R-l AS COMPLETE
The contractor, George Miller Construction Company, has compieted
tv-L~ ~l<-~~ µ_r,/&A,·_,.x_
the replacement of the two rnanholes~rfquired on this job and
I lfLt ~<h,
complied with all the contract requirements. AStaff 1recornrnends
I
acceptance of the work as complete)~filing of the Notice
:~ completion )fu-3= tl~s project. f/o.A-J, cG'f "" ·' f fl, ff 1 :,{
ex-ne:d c.i7,RJ.~, .
,d ~~,~--~ ~~ A
AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION; ieR~EE-R-4J ,DESIGN ~~R ,/
WESTSIDE FORCE MAIN, SECOND PHASE ()
l-tA V"' ~~l
The District's s p aff has monitored ~ flows being received by
~· ~ Seal Beach APumping Station and, in accordance with the Master
(!:;"~-;-.
Plan of Trunk _sewers_ for District No. ~Athe second force main ~
d~--Efl-e sewage from this pumping station to the Knott
Interceptor Sewer should~ constructed ~~~Be-G0m.::..
rne..Q..Ced during thi S-f.-i.s-ea-1-y-ea~r-. -In the ~g :X'fff tly adopted -~
by-the DiteCb5-1;.s, G..f the tot;ei.l $920,000 };mdget;9d for this force r""()"
ma-in-, $ 5 0 0 ~O Has 00€.B-Qudge t ed tO-he-e *~e-BEl.·ee-±-11 thi~s-ri-s-ca±
~-~~t th'5 I'!ebr aary Boanr.Meet:l:Ft~7 ~e Boards adopted4f policy
for the select.ion of professional engineering services_ Inoltid-ecl-
~--4~'t1":--B<~~a-s--a-~~~~ that when a consulting e ngineer
has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of
a project and the Board determines that it would be in the best
interest of the District to retain this firm for subsequent phases
of the work, then the Selection Committee ~ proceed directly
. hW-. . ~ ~ --tLv-. . ~ ~ . h' wi~ ~ negotiations :1.or compJl:a ~1 j n w1 :~~~~~-t:J, is
provision is particu l arly~ when a ~rn has completed-bl.. Master
1 d .~f ~1 1• • h ~~1 ~~~ ~ · · P an Report an is ~ am'i.-l~ar w1 t {\Simi ar proJ ects , ...... ...-.-9.!t-'\District ~
& ~"';,(. ~'lA,J'-'v-c.: ,__, ~-l VYI ~"""'; ~ ~~ Wtd. c.t~ {IA ,}~~}~ It ~is , l:here ~u re S recommended that the staff be authorized to ~ ~"}~ ~ ~·~~ <:~ .. •
negotiate directly with Boyie EHgineerir-r9-Ge-1"1'&~n /\to pre pare ~.
· · · f -hhi'Vc nrr.-i 'er-+-~ h' ~ -h ~ld .1 2:' the plans and specif 1cat ~on~ or _~ T .. is ~ct s ou f-:
be expedited b e cause of the v e ry favorable bids Qeing submitted by S---
. ~. . ?-contractors on ~r sewer construction ~~tJ:i..~r~Q4.-strrces at i
this time . =r.
8z and 8 aa I
CHANGE ORDER NO . 1 ; 2 TO CONTRACT NO. 5-20; .frib ~;;~ y
Th U change orde9' ill! for the purchase of ~.(o x~ma te 1 y 1, 000
additional linear feet of 24" class 50 ctii e iron pipe and
appurtenant fittings which will extend he Back Bay right
of way along Big Canyon to the Jamboree Pum~ Station . After
discussions with the affected agencies, incl uding the Department
of Fish and Game , the City of Newport Beach and the Coastal
I
Commission, and after a thorough review of the archaeologists
report for this facility, Qit
1
vyas decided /that it would be in the
rr(., ~ {!.t v C.VV"'-<-' -> ;.--i I
best interestX..c;>-f the project vto co~stru s t this portion in cast
JJ.rVv ~J) I
iron pipe in lieu of the original propo~ed vitrified clay pipe.
This material will be fu,ni ~hed ;o ~installatio~ contractor.-t{..,_,\-~~-teJ..Q ~ , ~~~kt~ I
R.jds for the in~Tht ieR are to be received on September 14th.
Staff recommends app:oval of th ~cr/.nge orde9 in the~nt of
$t:r; 9 gg .5 7 . h + 1-i<;. {, v--7 /
I I
I
8bb I
Authorizing AAward ~ Contract No . r 20 -Back Bay Trunk S;t
Bids for the installation of the s bwer pipe purchased f,k the
Back Bay: Trunk Sewer are sche~dule d to be received on /_14 with ~~ ''>
;i;a cei 1'1: !! E Lin:!\ 'b id s after the~ ea ing on this project by the
Regional Board of the California ~ Zone Conservation
Commiss i on which is scheduled for 1' l~. The staff and consulting
engineers ~ave reviewed this pr i ject with a ll ~~~Hxxix±Hg
[ into
affected agencies and have inc 9rporated/the plans and specifications
those requirements necessary t d meet the needs of those agencies
a:t!etcted. Since it is critical to complete the construction of
this facility before December 1, 1976, it wi ll be necessary to
award a contract after receipt of the Coastal Commission ~
Pe1 1 iO but prior to the Octobf r Board Meeting.
It is, therefore, recommende 1 that the General Manager be
authori z ed to award the contract for the bids to be received (J..N j~_()
/ ~'21'('ooo r;;:: ~R 9 14 in an amount not to r xceed $&!i'cl ,4@0 , ~approval of
the project by the Ca li fornia Coastal Zone Conservation Commission.
\
INITIATION OF ANNEXATION PROCEEDING~,-TRACT NO. 8925.
(ANNEXATION NO. 57)
I
I
Last month, the Board referred a req,Uest for the annexation of
'
7. 849 acres in the Lemon Heights ar~a in ~ unincorporated ~-f.tvJ,d;;1 ,
~~· ~1,·~,f C::
of the QisEriet to the staff forAr~c~mmendation. Th~~development
I
the District's low 1~ensi ty residential criteria
which ha• 1sccn established for this area ~ the District's
Master Plan. Staff recommends th'e Board adopt Resolution 76--7
initiating annexation proceedings.
I
\
I
INITIATION OF ANNEXA TION PROCEED I NGS -ft"'RCfi!O&SED ANNEXATION NO. 58)
~~ ~c.-k• I
I
At the August Board Meeting, the Bo ard referred t o staff for
recommendation a request for annexation of 13.410 acres located
northwest of Peter~ Can_ion, adjac/ent to Sirrine Drive in the
. ~ .. unincorporated area~of DistrictJ o. 7. The proposed developme nt
mee ts the District's low d e nsitL ~sidential criter ia wh-~
haea e stablished for this area ~Q bfte District's master p lan...._fl
Staff ~ends the Board adof t Resolution 76-J'}_L-7 initiating
annexation proceedings .
\
\
~
~This item appearing~ agendJr orders ~he annexation of
6.934 acres t o the District , which is north est of Peters Canyon
Road advacent to Sirrine , Mira Vista and Ov rhill Drives in the
unincorporated territo ry of the District . Tre Board authorized
initiation of proceedings for annexation in March, 1976. LAFCO
approva l has been received and the proponent has paid the
require d fees. It is the staff's recommendati o n that Reso lution
No. 76-~ be approved.
REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION -TRACT NO. 9072
The District has received a formal request for annexation of
10.04 acres which is located on the south side of Bond Avenue
660 feet east of Rancho Santiago in the City of Orange. It is
recommended that the request of the property owner be referred
to staff for report and recommendation :to the Board.
. k
( ... ~
i ~ CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 1 and 2 TO CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9
J v'J_ c(/
~h@s~ @hange order~)~e for adjustments ~engine r' ,J ~ d--;-, '"'c ~L CLo--~ ~k Y'u, I
quantiti =.:'.)~n~-t o~a-~ deduction ~ffi~UR_!_of 7.~5 ~80 ~~plY• ~Re
addition of backfill material as required ~n the specifications
~'
at the bid stipulate ~;am~~~or a total of $9,1361 J.U,.s.e ov....J
ip.clude~}~~L ~~~t,e~i .~ ~k of a private
roadway~in the amount of $6,016.4{}-.J ich was deleted from the
original bid document but would h elv e normally been included as part
original work required oF~he contractor. RNX~Ke These
change orders increase the ;r .~nal amount of ;;:::' contract by a~{
$14,901.20, or approximately Staff recommends approval)~
these change-o~ders.
'·
.
«/~ ~j
l
~ ACCEPT~ Cf" CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 0-1 ~
The contractor, Sully-Miller Contracting Company,, has completed
the installation of this portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk
. d . . ) h Sewer and has complie with all requirements Ou t e contract
documents. Ge;:,r.:,~t ·nst:attee. 7500 feet 00 4", 21" and 18"
diameter pipe ~in the El Modena area, beginning at the intersection
of Spring Street and Santiago Boulevard and terminating at
Linda Vista and Santiago .In
-
~I a?-~~(
I
I
-.
\\\.
~ ~
~
~
~
~
j
" J / Staff recommends adopt ion of the Resolution attached to the ~
~~<tf agenda material authorizing the filing
1
of the Notice of Comp~etion
\
I -. --
rt s hould be noted that the contract0r completed this contract '~
within the time allotted for the prj ject, 56 days prior to the '\
e xpiration date . This project com/letes the Tustin-Orange Trunk
Sewer within the pr e sent District o . 7 boundaries . --
.
C£ 11
Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 11-lR-l
This change order adjusts the engineer's quantities ~a total
t..~~..:.
amoYni=-of '?f $731 d.ed~elion. The original plans specified that
the contra~epair a manhole in the State Highway (Beach Blvd.y
and the eentrac=l=ef was delayed by the State Depa ~e nt of Transportation
wa~ for an encroachment permit to inspect ~ manhole. After
thorough examination of the manhole, .-.f te r Qpp r eval for cntrane@
~ was obtainee , it was found that t~would not need repair .w...J
)
~ was, therefore, deleted fro·m the contract. Staff r ecommends
approval of this change order.
ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT NO. 11-lR-l
) . \ Contractor, Rewes Schock has completed the /repair or replacement
of manholes on the Newland Del award Trun1/:nd has complied with /"
all requirements of t he contra ~~. d_cccu~~~:~Staf f recommends y~
adoption of the ~esol~tion attache ~o the agend ~ mateFial L:. fi ~~ i . Y €A1 rzu.;~ 1 '{)'~--'.IJ
authorizing _ filing of the Notic /f __ Comple_t io_n ~ ~t _•honld l5e
n.o;&ea 'th deletions and J ajustments, the final contract
cost was $1,871 lowe r than the original contract pr ice, or ( . /
approximately 5% under the or'ginal contract amount. -------------------------~-----
I
fl1'· 71
ResolntiOR EstablishingJUse Charge Fees for Class I and Class II
'Discharger.~f&~-~ustr~:~ ~:st~) O~ftinan~
The~trial Waste Ordinance, which became effective '. ~
th/{ 'G;~~'Jff~Eers ~ establish July 1st of th~s_yeari p .. rovides .+ ~ ~k.1J-w' th-~o.·-<--'" .. "1:'-chargef~for £..the nse g..f "conveying, treating and disposing of
sewage ~h~ Districts'~cilities a.AQ eaia ehar~e shall be based ~ L • ) -&-v.-J ,_
upon the total maintEman aperation,--capital-.expenditures .. and
tbe reserve requirements for providing.-said-s-erviee. Class I
industrial dischargers are the major industries in the County
which will discharge volumes in excess of 50,000 gallons per day
or discharge wastewaters which have a strength 50% greater than
d · ~d. h · · h 'd d omestic sewage or~ isc arging constituents t at are consi ere
incompatible with the Districts' sewerage system. The use-e-ha~ge,
~e~c-~ging 12-mo:r:.i_th-per.iod and any ~~-eJt.J;>r credi-t. ------··-------~ -.-~··-~-
~jus-t.-me.nt-.for ___ the. prece¢iing 12-month pe:r:j._gg_~§tiall __ J>e_ .included.. in.
the i mz.o.i-ce -to-the--respe_ctiye. permit tee.. Class II dischargers
are the industries which discharge more than 10,000 gallons per day
but less than 50,000 gallons per day and are not required to
l.(_~e.
obtain a Class I permit ~ their discharge has been determined
to be compatible with the Districts' sewerage system.
Inasmuch as both Class I and II permittees are credited in the
amount of the annual ad valorem tax levied by the Districts upon
the property for which the permit has been issued by the District,
exclusive of that portion of the tax paid for debt service, each
individual District must adopt separate resolutions establishing
the use charges because of the varying tax rates within the
individual Districts.
A '
14,i .flJ ~ /cflfp : Y>_ -fruJ ~ (.,,.v-< &..._ :a:;;. j t"V-.J ,/z,_J 11 di,
~ d ~ U'-,rµ'(Jt:-:/-~ ]_~ fa rt_ I ~~~ ~ 4&£rrt--rL_ ~~---
A ~e-s,t,aJ;.~.eornm~aseG.-u¥e" hlle provisions""" J~
contained in Section 302.6 and 303.1 of ~he Industrial Waste
Ord in a nee , that th.e-Ba a rd es t.a~-s-l=i-1=.ae-i:rs·e-efl.a-~~e.r-tl:ie, ~
Class I a nd Class II permit~for the respective Districts as
follows:
....,---·--
I
/
j
II
--'-.
_ l2_s~~ iiiMeo c pvn..r~~
r 9lg.,s,g I~
~~~~~~-:-----~~~~-
11.
VALUE ENGINEERING FOR JOB NO. P2-23 75-MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE
I
TREATMENT FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2
.,,,,,.---·· ~-~ rr/.l..t.~ ,0 l
//A re. c_ent ·.regulation'¥af£ec.ting the cons ruction grant programs•
/---n:' ---. le .~P i" ~· ~1 ~the(fEnvitonmental Protecti~~Ag~~~y\is the provision that all
projects in excess of $10 million are s bject to value engineering
procedures to insure that the faciliti s are constructed in
accordance with the best available tee nology and construction
pro_cedures.
be performed
Regtilations stipulate that1value engineering must
by an independent engine~ring firm, not associated
with the designE{t:. fl'-'. 1 • ·: ot_.,
l_ I
At th~ 27 Executive Commit:Eee M~ing,_this matter ~Ms
di.s_cussed and t~e-~J~~.ff_outlined. A tw;o phase procedure for the
.~;~Jue engineer~, ~n;~.e .• ~~o,(·m~;uo~, /~.~p~o,v{t~Y,~:rr ~~~~1~y 1~s .A·
C ~at Plant No. 2 .~ Phase I will involv1 tbe evaluation of the process <..
I a~d operation associatedJi:t:l:i the oxygen activated sludge portion ~-\ ~) ~--. \·\--1' -(It>-~,_
of these facilities. J1I..:e-is p~sed 1 that the con~ulting ·fi-rm of~-·
Consoer-Townsend-and-Associat~s qf s!an Jose be employed to work .. ~
. . i
in coDjnnction with the Di-s-t-ri-G-t~p.e.rational engineer for this
I ~hase II will emphasize the/construction and maintenance
valu.·e engineering and employe .. a:ulsi e contr1cting s;oµsult;ants, ~. g ~ c.. ... -~ .CM.) u.nl..J 1,,-# ,~ "',/1' c.-.~ c":-A. k 'tt .. ~ ~ ~"'-"' AV!l~.l
~with several key personne~ on the D stricts' staffA It was-U ~
,,(.C-(t..·"' . ~~·h
-~reported to the EXe-cutive Committee hat both phases of value
engineering for this project will no exceed $175,000, which is
grant fundable by the State and EPA.
<i 1 rnclud~d in~ agenda material is a staff report to be submitted
to the State and EPA for their ~pproval. 1lb~bntinue on our
schedule to submit the plans and specifications to the State in
April o~ next year as required by the construction grant program,
~
it i~ ne~essary to employ ~ firm of Cefteoer Townseat & Assoeiates ~ ~:f u.M.L. DJprior t.o the October Board Meeting. It is, therefore, recommended
that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiat&itith
Consoer Townsen~ and AssocJates in accordance with the policy adopted
by the Boards for the .Employment of ~ofessional ingineering
o-~rvice7 and that District No. 1 be authorized to award t.R-e-" contract
for ~~ic~t~~n adjourned Board Meeting on Sept. 22. .
At the August Board Meeting,----ttre Director~' approved the plans and
..........,/ /
specifications for the installation of p'tmps, engines and·/ gear
~xes at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. ~major
\ ~~;· equipment has been purchased under . · contracts approved
by the Boards. Since bids for these ~~ditional pumping facilities
at the Foster Outfall Booster Station/will not be received until
next Tuesday, September 7th, the repJrts of the bid opening will
be included in the Wednesday ntal agenda for~oards
consideration. The Engineer's Esti ate for this inslallalion
ceaErac~ is $310,000.
I) APPROVAL OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
TRUNK SEWER, AND APPROVJI li 6i' tfr,~N~--~~D
c..,::t:-tl--J /-I { -PRe>OELT
· ( ~--------------~ • ,,m,._~~~ '\
REPORTfi:,:?R RAITT STREET_./
SPECIFICATIO~FOR THE
--·---·-··-· --·-.-__ ,_, ... J
I
I
o.,,/L,.., e..~<. _/
The as:rtion~ appea~ing on the agenda forinallyAapprov~ the ~tw-'. "_, ~~ -l' ~ ~ '0-1 t {i ( ~, .. /1 t..! tL ~:,;., ~-~)
.Environmental Impact Report~for the~Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, which
extends from Sunflower Ayenue to Myftle. Ay.epu~ along Raitt Street
~·e; ~/. ~. t·r~., ...tt/(._ __ .:::Z..J.,AA·J'. (: 1;(
in the City of Santa Ana~ /The staff and/or t~ District's
,
engineer( have been in contact-with the/Public Works Departments
persffl!!ltl of all agencies affected and have not.received.any
signir icant adverse co.mments on the-pr jec±..
r (, l'~t··
recommended that the~EIR be approved.
~pearing under this item is ~ appr
Therefore, it is
the plans and
specifications as prepared by Boyle
contract ~the District
~J
ineeringCorporation under
theae..
plans and specificationsA~·s.....J:.e~llllllle..lliJ.~~uu;~c...ne-..D-*~-a.e~a--:e:e--se----
µ ~-v...,,.~ , I
estahli•h9d is October 5, 1976~ The Engineer's Estimate for
this project is $1,405,000. \
Item 22
Engineering Services for the Feasibility Report Re: Sleepy Hollow
Carbon Canyon Drainage Area
Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter received from the
State Water Resources Control Board approving the Plan of Study
and the cost assoc~ated rherewit!f fort~! Steepy ~ollow A Carbo~~
~~. ' (JJQ ~~ ~~-~·-)..A_. ~ ~~ &,# ~
Canyon drainage ~-Jtple Select~onUcornmittee, &G Qatlined in the
Board policy for fhe Selection of Professional Engineering Services,
)UA(J-~ M ~'· t., 9.--.. I rt_
will meet~with the firm which appears to be the best qualified
for th&--f>~ejeetc~& submi=tted a pre~esal to perform the required
services. The Selection Committee_,.-€emprised ef the Bi~triet; We. 6
Chairman and the Djitriets' J;)e~arlment Heads, w~ti meet gi;;i.
T-u.e-sday, Se~t;emb.e.:t:--7-en e:nd will present their recommendations to
the Board for .est?t consideration on Wednesday evening.
24.
ANNEXATION NO. 7 -NEWPORT -IRVINE COASTAL AREA
This aRftcxa~ieft request· by the Irvine Company proposes the
->~I\~
annexation of approximately J4.<ttr acres of the down coast
Q.92&5 !al. te:i;:
1
ri tory between Newport Be··.· ac .. h al)fi Buck Gully Wash.
~ {'f'--~'t>t,··,( l. ~ ()..cC,cir ':"""~~ . r. ·ti~
']!hi ~ma%tcr was discuss~,d at ~~mb~-t; ~9ard P1eet:tn.g h. e,ld ~ /J {'' t \J.J~ ' -' '-~'~ ~· O"\.V · r.tl. '· ( "'° r '<..CS[ 1-t{A&. /'.,. -~(l /U-~J C!.v..--~ _y t•(.~ll-' V
at the Newport Beach b ty e.ouncil 6.hambersl\en 'fttarsda:y, Oest. 12. .{)1
•"""'
Enclose~~ a_gend;;i~m<;1,te:ria~ i1> a_ lettu. from tfe property tJ;,;.~ ~ ~~f)..•.·c.t u_n'tL ,~-• ~ C\,tlL~,.;t. f>'tt/t-~~' c.. ~--. ~ ~"f· kft ().A~ t
owner requesting annexation~ftft'd ~t~ payment of $2, 139->, 790. ooA for ~\!l. Vt r
1535 acres desic;mated hr develo~ment.'fithin t~e proposed ~~ ,IV' ~Ct> l'"-/)(\.. ~i~( ~1-~
nnexation are~. JGeneral CounselAwi-li :t:~pert ht Wednesday_.-s
~ ;ti__ ~;J;-~ meeti~ .as te ehe.conditions ~annexation as set ~rth by the
~J e. . (JV\_ 0 •
D'i:fe9-terS--.st St@ 'fcp~emb-. · · ! August 12; cu-~ l.Jfl,eJ.
~~;1 fV. ~ -o:f -:t(_\ I l~I 1' e \ ' ;. 'A \_ u.a, (. · t .(:>' ~(·
. {j lJ -
The Irvine Company ha~ed application t~ocal Age~
Formation Commission fer ~Ris aBRexation in order that ~~
~ matt:er can be heard before the<Jbrnmission at their regular
September 22nd meeting .
...
~·~){~_,
T~aff is req-aesting discussions on thi;s matter in erder
1/l Mp:.r
_that_ tbe staf-£ ~ Gener.a~ Counsel can (rece.b.r..e-the Bqa.rd 9't. A iJ_
~ ~,vy ~ i.,: /r-r 61 ~J!fa'< ~tJVe~f'
direeeibrt ~set~ ~11 co,1fditions1~prov~ng~-~~_e:?I1ent ~tX. --<t~-lfVtrte~L/ ~ ~~A-(·1 ' o
with the Irvine Company,A:'ela~~~Uee tRe annexation i~ceFporating
)
said condtio.ns inte the resolutions ~itiat:ing proceedings for k /) ' • ttl . /ID.A /)_:I,~( 1 '-
thi e down coast ~a. • : -(;) ao/'Ap l.A.(.c. ~-(... ~ /--~
I {,,' f2t. ~fi'--<I' ;;A._ ·c ~;/ eel'#t:t!: ' ' ' .
' t lJ ~
27.
FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF ORANGE PARK
ACRES
. --
of Thirty-two (32) Digester
~( Approve Addendum No. 1 to Job No. J-6-lD
{!)~pprove Addendum No.· 1 to Specification No. E-080
Operators, Diversion Structure
requirements ~
. -:::-.._ -~ ·-. -. ,c ~~g,V~n~ ,~-)., e Oraers f or ~act 2-14-ef 1~1 ~lfY ()i<-~j \!}A i 114 /'-il
~ Contract 2-14-4 as complete d pprove Final Closeout Agreement
Q'~R ~~ protest of Vida Artukovich re denial of claim by CSD in the ~rn;~nt of $67,960.85 for standby costs incurred re Contract 2-16-2
-S'et\ time and place~ri~g re inti.a · annexat ·on in Vill /.Park
Ann~~-Tract N'o-..-23.5-C}--./"(if .LAFC resolution approving
annexation is received) £2,.yt-
'
_9.R11e~ p ry-~ngs
5/12/76 z-b.382 ac"'?e-5
DISTRICT 3
l Y?Init~a~e a~n e xation proceedings for down-coast ar e a subj e ct to pr e scribed
conditions t-V ~
(}.I.-..; "' ~~to " i" ~ .... ~"'\}' &.. fa~....-' l y--~-b,;,,&~{brfD ,o
ward ~ohtract.for Back Bay T:unk Sewer, Contract No. 5-20,./\.conditional
pending receipt of the p e rmit from the Coastal Commission
H '2. ,·z,./ ~~
_ch?1ge Order~ to Contract 5-20A for cast iron "T" fittings -a~~eqtt~
t_C v q_y th_e.,_jj,_s~(;ame-Dep_t._ for futur e /\co nnections f;;rs, qgo . S7
· ~ y; 3rJf.o.5
. ..
DISTRICT 7
7
Initiate
<:Cl Of. ( R & F I d
annexation proceedings re Annexation No.
8/11/76) ?? ~eed REL recommendation.
57 -Tract No. 8295
~·i ~nitiate annexation proceedings re Annexation No. 58 -Baker Annexation
Cl (R & F'd 8/11/76) ?? Ne ed REL recommend a tion.
~ ,_/order Annexation No. 48 -Tract ~No. 5369 (~AFC---r--e.s0 ~ut-i...on--reoe~-ved-; r.,~~ .~ea-r~ng--hei:<l-8 /11.-/761 ~ )<r'W t~
Ord -·-i ~~M~~~o~~~ ' /I . -ring _ /"'81 11 /7 6 )
_./ ..___..,
I-+ g__.... ~Change Orders to Contract 7-6-9 for additional pavement and adjustment
of engineer's quantities .:f15>33 '1.o-o -+ ~t 4 d-s ./Sal~-g~J
t ~pt Contract 7-6-9 as complete and approve Final Clos eout Agreement
: ~ive, file & refer to staff request for annexation of 10.04 acres from
(~Hillcrest Village -Proposed Annexation No. 59 -Tract No. 9072
E STRICT 11 -.
{.Ji"( ~JW3.JL ~ ~ ?..-~ \I -\ -\ ~ ~' i ~.ll/lt;.~ -4 ~ QJ~~ 1-:.?q ~t,\)
-0 e.,.A(ccep1 Contract 11-1-lR as comple'te and approve Final Closeout Agreement v ------------·-----fi/&i\Y:: '11)---rc::;_.· -----
. Rece ive and f ile Draft Maste~an-~e-r-~t rict 11 and ~ adjourn~&--t:'
meeting for September 13.~e ets prior to September 8th
meeting at 6:00 p.m . als .
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 JOINT MTG.
~a) Report of the Joint Chairman
Winn reported that he and Director Barrett attended the CASA Conference in San
Diego. Said that top people from SWRCB and EPA were there. Met Ralph Bolin,
the presiding officer of CASA. Thought one of the highlights was his election
as Director-at-Large. Met new Chairman of SWRCB, John Bryson. Asked Director
Barrett for his comments--thought that the various programs were very good.
JWS also reported on Conference. John Bryson and Paul Defalco were there. Said
these people are coming to us now and is a real indication of how effective CASA
has become in dealing with regulatory agencies throughout the State. Several
of the programs were geared to Directors. Also had some technical sessions on
revenue and grant programs. This was the most successful conference CASA has had
to date.
Wieder asked how many Directors participated in conference and was told just
Winn and Barrett. Said she was disappointed more didn't attend.
Winn mentioned that they had gotten hung up on parliamentary procedures at the
conference and should try to avoid that in the future.
(6b) Report of the General Manager
(6c)
FAH reported that at the August meeting it was suggested that the Directors view
the operation of the JPL operation at Plant 2. We are planning this event for
the next Board meeting. Will meet between 5:30 and 6:30 prior to the October 13th
meeting and if Boards approve, will come back here for a light dinner. Said if
anyone would like to invite their staff from cities are welcome to do so but will
have to charge them a nominal fee for dinner. County Auditor will not pay for their
dinners. It was so moved and seconded to do this. FAH said invitations will
be mailed to Directors.
Cooper asked Mr. Harper to clarify what he just said. Explained that prior
to the next Board meeting we could rent a bus or drive to Plant 2 to see the
1 MGD facility which is the new method of treating wastewater. A light dinner
will be served at 7:00 and may start the Board meeting at 8:00.
Holt asked if this would be the only time a tour would be available? FAH said,
no, that he could just call and we would make arrangements for a tour.
Mr. Harper then briefly reported that he just returned from his EPA trip to
Russian. Said he hoped to have some pictures to show at the next Board meeting.
Said everything looked like it was made in America. Treatment facilities looked
like they were 50-60 years old but were 10 years old. Said he was concerned about
the domestic water supply and what happened to waste from its system. Water in
the bathtub in Moscow looked the color of coffee. Listed a few places he had
visited. Said it was an interesting trip and will have slides to show later.
Report of the General Counsel
TLW reported that he did get a response regarding recovery of expenses for
undisclosed utities from the Gas Company. Answer has been filed in court and
rather lengthy written correspondence has been received. Said it should be
quite interesting. Sounds like they are ready to sit down and talk settlement.
Reported he attended the CASA meeting just from 8:45 -10:00 and sat on panel.
~
(6a)
Cont.
(8)
Also advised that legislation has now been signed for alternate Directors to be
appointed from sanitary districts.
Chairman Winn then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for September 22,
1976, and invited Directors Holt and Olson to attend.
CONSENT CALENDAR -Items removed:
(g) Scott referred to attachment "L" and said it changes insurance for one person
to $300,000 and for more than one person to $1 million. Has to only be one
amount. Can't split bodily injury. Should require $300,000 for one or two
persons and $1 million umbrella policy. TLW explained that that was our
intent and requirement would be that way.
Svalstad said contractor should have read these insurance requirements in
specs and should give us a cost reduction. It costs money for this coverage
and if he read specs, should have bid with these requirements.
REL explained that we have standard specifications which have our larger
requirements in them. For most of the smaller contracts that are awarded,
we use these reduced requirements. Stated it was an inadvertency on staff's
part that we did not clarify that to contractor.
Svalstad added that if other contractors bid on requirements in specs,
might make a difference in bids. Perry agreed. Suggested that specs be
amended so this doesn't happen again.
REL stated that some of the small contractors can't get that much insurance.
Winn asked if REL could negotiate a reduction in contract. Said he could
possibly do so.
It was moved and seconded to negotiate for some kind of cost reduction in
contract. (not necessarily the $1,000 reduced premium amount but just some
reduction)
(y) Svalstad stated that he felt this should go to Selection Committee rather
than go directly to Boyle. REL agreed that Svalstad was correct. Wording
should say authorizing "Selection Committee" to negotiate as the fee will
be between $10,000 and $100,000.
Svalstad questioned Boyle being the only one submitting proposals. REL
stated that in accordance with the policy if the engineer has done the basic
plan, can be selected without going through other engineers. If we cannot
negotiate with that engineer, then can go to other engineers. Said Boyle
did design first facility. Is familiar with hydraulic system. In accordance
with policy, is the logical engineer to negotiate with. Svalstad said, fine,
but want to make sure we do negotiate with them and if they aren't competitive,
should go to selection process. Whether they designed it or not, shouldn't
automatically go to Boyle.
Item (y) was then approved as amended authorizing Selection Committee to
negotiate with Boyle Engineering. Voice vote. Motion carried.
-2-
(10) Resolutions establishing use charges
(12a)
JWS reported that the Uniform Ordinancesthat the seven Districts adopted provide
that after the budgets have been adopted each year, the Board establishes a rate
for the industrial commercial users. Board adopted budget in August and these
figures set forth various charges for Class I and Class II permittees. Figures
are based on Operating budgets of each respective District. They are actually
less than we had anticipated last year when considering the ordinances, primarily
because Nf construction and completion of activated sludge facility.will probably
be about six months later than anticipated. Said these costs reflect primary
treatment only. When secondary treatment is on line these costs will increase
substantially. Total cost for joint Districts in Los Angeles County is $230 as
opposed to $194 as highest charge in District 11.
Award of J-6-lD
REL briefly explained that this contract is for installation of two engines,
pumps and gear boxes at the booster station at Plant No. 2. Said two years ago
we received bids for this project which were over the engineer's estimate.
Staff was instructed to do work. Have awarded three contracts for equipment.
Young then asked what happens if a contractor we are having trouble with bids
on a future job. TLW said it is in within the rights of the District to determine
if he is not qualified if he is low bidder provided we have some reasonable basis.
District is not bound to award to him and can go to next low bidder. Failure to
comply with construction standards in previous jobs of if he has financial problems
that cost District for stop notices etc. are reasonable causes.
Cooper added that he wanted to make sure Skipper & Co. was a qualified company
~ and Young's question answered this.
(24) DISTRICT 5 -Down-coast area annexation
(b) TLW reported that the action of Directors of District 5 at special meeting
was made quite clear. Mr. Jones expressed some concern apout additional
"' \ _, requirements that in the event any··-porffon-'(ff '-the" annexed territory is
\
1
'« \.. "~) ! ·, '· .. subsequenfly annexed to another entity, District 5 will have the right to
deaiinex~-1om said direction he received was to try to reach agreement with
~'"-· _,, '~-':"· !( Th·e Irvine Company by going forward to LAFC with request for annexation .
. . ,. · r• 1, t·
1l One alternate possibility was to not perform annexation but enter into an
agreement with The Irvine Company or Irvine Ranch Water District.
;., , , .· Said his opinion was that both alternatives present some practical and
·" legal difficu1_1Jes. Said he ........ faIKed-tO' Mc1ririis this. evening and think we
now have a lot better direction in terms of being able to establish that
The Irvine Company and IRWD would give to District 5 letters of consent
and agreement that would set forth the conditions as enumerated by District 5
at their last meeting. Thought to go on basis of annexation that would be
d.edar-ed-fo have the right of deannexation would be most difficult to enforce.
Very clearly defined statutory procedures on deannexation which could entail
an election. Irvine Company might not even be the owners. Therefore, we
can proceed with The Irvine Company in terms of getting an agreement. Can
obtain letters of intent, consent and obligation or whatever from the Irvine
Company and would also recommend that IRWD be made a party to it as they
will be the local sewering agency to our system.
Mcinnis stated he was looking for more than letters of intent. More interested
in document drawn in legal form even though it might not be enforceable 10
years from now. Agreement should be with The Irvine Company as land owner and
IRWD as sewering agency. Should draw it up in legal form even though quite
-3-
sure someplace along the line may not be legally enforceable. Need
something for LAFCO as conditions of annexation.
Winn then asked if Districts ever looked at a master plan that might
someday encompass the whole Orange County? FAH explained that each of
the Districts has its own master plan is which based pretty much on the
drainage area. They could serve just a portion in District 5. This area
has already been considered in their master plan. In this particular case
based on the latest land use plan of the County, we are looking at a total
acreage of About 25% will be developed. The area in this is
undeveloped area outside District 5. Reiterated that each of the
Districts have their own master plans of areas that could be served.
Winn said possibly the Executive Committee should take a look at some
kind of master plan for the County and review it.
Back to Mcinnis' request. He stated he is looking for a formal agreement
between District 5, The Irvine Company and Irvine Ranch Water District,
which spells out the conditions under which we will enter into such an
agreement and what we do in the event the conditions change in the future.
Said this is almost identical to discussion they had at last District 5
meeting. Said he thought the attorney understood what he is saying and
the Directors of District 5. TLW stated he thought we could strike some
agreement. Said Mr. Jones indicated The Irvine Company is willing to sign
such an agreement. Have requested they provide that in the event District 5
should deannex, that they would agree to serve it on a contract basis.
TLW recommended that that would be appropriate.
Mcinnis then stated that with that understanding, was ready to move back
and move staff's recommendation on 24(a). Motion seconded & carried.
TLW concurred. District would provide sewerage service to the territory
to be annexed; the owner, The Irvine Company, would pay the annexation
fees presently in force; that District 5 reserves the right to initiate
any and all legal proceedings to have the territory either deannexed or
detached from the jurisdiction of the District in the event any portion
of the annexation is annexed to another municipal jurisdiction other than
the City of Newport Beach.
Mcinnis stated his motion was subject to Tom Woodruff's concurrence in
agreement.
(24d & e) It was suggested by Mcinnis that the District adjourn to September 21st
to consider both these resolutions. Moved and seconded to adjourn to
Sept. 21 at 5:30 p.m. at Newport Beach City Hall to consider resolutions.
Voice vote. Motion carried.
(27) DISTRICT 7 -OPA
(a) TLW referred to the lengthy report submitted with agenda and stated he had
no further report. Said additional fees have not been received yet.
(b) Saltarelli requested that District 7 for the next six months at least not
be placed last on the agenda.
He further stated it was his understanding that the District Directors would
meet at an OPA school or in the area so everybody could disseminate at that
time and place. Said staff should bring to that place a graphic _!'~~PE.~-~-12.!..~~iog_
of what we are talking about so they can see where the trunk lines are and
-4-
I' \ .
'' '·
\·
\,
I
\,'
\
' I ~11,.'
and a cost analysis ot_wha_!_i!_~Jll~f_<?~~t J~.h.entJ:p _g~t. ~-hat .:they. get s9 .
they can see what it means to t_hem,_. Said he felt this is an opportunity
to vote on this issue and we have to see that we inform them of all the
f~ct.s. No withholding of information. Has been withholding and ~t~lnfoAma~
tion in the past. Asked if staff can have this type of presentation
prepared.~'a:rid how long it would take?
Smith said he thought staff was going to arrange a meeting at the Santiago
School which is where they usually meet. Mr. Brock suggested the Salem
Lutheran Church Sunday School area. Is suitable for a meeting of this type.
Will be able to set up charts, etc. Said he can make arrangements if we let
him know the date.
Saltarelli stated we are not going to make November ballot so will shoot for
March--~ Should get proper lriroimat'Ion f o. everyone.
Burton asked if he was requesting a full-scale blown-up map with parcels and
location of trunks? Answered yes.
FAH then recognized Mr. Hohener. Said he could describe what maps are
available. Burton said if we are going to have a map that depicts where
the main trunks are and what is considered on the main bond, any__Ji:i.d.!vJc;lu?-1
that is a home o~er or prop_~-~!Y. q_wner should be able to ask where his
property is in --relationship to these trunks. Conrad stated that has been
aiilap-prepared which shows complete master plan of the area and each individual
home owner can point to his lot and see the sewer it is on. Said Enginee_i-~ s
Report which was completed l(lst Spring_must be l:lP<l~ted so_ it has new A.V. 's.
BurtorCaske'd-if-iii.dividuals can ask where their parcel is and have it explained
as many people cannot read a map. Map should be large enough and easy to read.
Smith then asked for a brochure-type document referring to Reaches 17 & 18.
Said if you have to show 300 people their lot, would take all evening.
Should also have small map with main streets and show them where main trunk
lines go. Burton argued that if all you can see are the trunks, you can't
understand relationship and it is going to be very difficult for them to
make a decision.
Winn said he was concerned that many of the people will be paying for this
service and not be subject to it. Staff should make l1P brochure, .. map, _ _,etc.
and send to District 7 Directors to rev1~~before~~g0Ing_ tq~-p~gpt~.
Ma~ -~~1Ta ·s-pecial meeting before go:ti1g to OPA area. ·
Saltarelli stated that he was sure that the staff will be able to prepare
the necessary information to present. Will plot maps. Analysis of
financial breakdown; how much it is going to cost per A.V. Be sure people
are fully informe-cf aiid-In-£6-rmation going out is correct. Asked members of
tfie stafr necess-iri to be there to answer questions re sewer service'
connections, etc.
Rach said they had voter records if that would help. Offered his assistance.
It was mentioned again that District 7 may have a special meeting to consider
material before mailout to property owners.
Smith asked if people are approximately three blocks from main trunk line,
canstafftell that person approximately how much it will cost to get there?
FAH answered yes, can tell them that. Could have information sometime in
October. Winn suggested having preliminary meeting prior to October meeting
and then set a date for OPA meeting at that time.
-5-
'i ~,'
r'
Smith then referred to General Counsel's report (item (a). Said he
realize·d· these are methods to serve that area but doesn't set too well
with City of Orange. Said he would like to ask this Board if this is
o~r-the-·ways that they are considering (condemnation of line)? Thought
there· ·woul(f be a lot better feelings if this isn't quoted around too much.
Would like to ask the Board if they will remove that as one_qf the
possi1iilrt1es? -.~:--~T·~:· --· -·· r-·~r ... -'.
---·-\..__"'" '"' •j. ..... ~. ·• I' <;I l )
Burton stated this is part of a public agenda. Would be making it a bigger
thing by taking it out. Would create a condition where it appears that
Directors are attempting to mitigate something. Is something all of our
councils are faced with.
TLW stated that he simply put out a report. Staff has in no way indicated
~ a-preference or recommendation for any method of acquisition or establishment
of a line. These are just three possibilities. They may vote to do anything
) they wish. The main point is that if bond election and annexation are
successfully pa·s-sed;· -at -that time the District would incur an obligatibn
to-uri.derta1Ce to provide a trunk sewer system. Have the obligation to provide
-.-.--r~---'"
l
-~
service.
Sal tarel li __ said he thought it is premature to take any action on that. . Only
in the event the issue passes will the Directors have to begin discussion
to bring about~C!YS of providing_ facilities.
Winn asked if it would be in order if this information not be in the
information sent to the people? Saltarelli stated he didn't think that
the way we xliM«i« go about building a sewer is of any concern to the
people. Should be concerned only with what will they get; how much will it
cost; and who will be served.
Burton asked what would happen if issue passes and action is not to condemn?
TLW said his opinion was that District has legal obligation to provide the
service. Probably can force District to provide service--must build or buy.
Burton said he did not see anything wrong with discussing condemnation in
the open as this is meant to be discussed. By removing it is blowing it
out of correct proportion.
Smith then withdrew his request_ to remove this alternative. Felt his request
-------~---was partially misunderstood by Directors.
It was stated that ?t~ff __ wiU su_b!!li t preliminary drafts of information to be
Sliotnitted at tne" OPA meeting __ ~~ be called sometime 'after the October meeting. -----. . . . ... • . . .• -· --They ca1led an adjourned meeting after the Board meeting--date to be determined
at the October meeting. Will be late October or early November. Rach
suggested first of December would be a good time.
TLW added that an updat_~ of_ th.~ __ J~qyle_rep_o:r:t would entail.Jnore engineering
fees:-Said Directors-gave instructions that expenses will amount to monies
deposited. Will be engineering costs for updated report. Rach said additional
funds will be deposited but they have reached a point where people need this
meeting to decide whether they are in favor or not. Rach felt meeting was
very important to everyone concerned. TLW said if we go forward, will have
additional legal fees, engineering fees, posting & publication notices,
election fees, etc.--approximately $2700 additional needed.
-6-
FAH said don't pay any funds for updating report. ??
Smith said they should leave it up to staff to get what funds needed
to cover the expenses.
Conrad Hohener advised that there are 450 parcels and have to go to
County to get valuations. Have to put figures in and maybe have to
revise. Some 60 acres already annexed to City of Orange will have to
be deleted.
Winn suggested that staff update the District report, within limits,
(and don't let Directors know what it costs).
Winn suggested District 7 pick a time separate from Executive Committee
or Joint Meeting day for this adjourned meeting.
!
I' f'
~ ... '
~~ 7 , ..
f', ·-'.
-7-
I
\