The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1976-08-11COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 5, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1~ 2/ 3, 5, 6, 7J 8 & 11 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1976 -7:30 P.M, 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FourntdN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 cf Ora..nge County, Califo:mia, ldll be held at the above hour and date. ·scheduled upcoming meetings: BUILDING COMMI11'EE ·-Wednesday, August 11, 1976, 5; 30 p .m. (immediately preceding Regular Joint Meeting) DISTJHCT 5 -·nmrscby. August l:?, 1976~ 5:00 p.m., at Newport Beach City Hall COUNTY SANITATION DISTHICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALI FOHN IA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE rouNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92~ (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE co~~fITTEE MEETING DATES Month August September "October November December January February March April May June July August Joint Board Meeting Date Aug. 11, 1976 Sep. 8, 1976 Oct. 13, 1976 Nov. 10, 1976 Dec. 8, 1976 Jan. 12, 1977 Feb. 9, 1977 Mar. 9, 1977 Apr. 13, 1977 May 11, 1977 Jun. 8, 1977 Jul. 13, 1977 Aug. 10, 1977 * Thanksgiving Eve -subject to rescheduling Tentative Executive Committee Meeting Date None Scheduled Sep. 22, 1976 Oct. 27, 1976 Nov. 24, 1976 * None Scheduled Jan. 26, 1977 Feb. 23, 1977 Ma:r. 23, 1977 Apr. 27, 1977 May 25, 1977 Jun. 22, 1977 Jul. 27, 1977 None Scheduled II BOARDS OF Dm[;'.CTORS Counly Ser.it1Jtion Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, c~lifornia 10 844 Ellis Avenu e Fountain Voll ey, Cal i f., 92708 Tel cplionu: JOINT BOARDS Ateo Codn 71-4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE .&U.;,, ADJOU RNMENTS POST ED.f "" 11 AUGUST llJ 1976 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESI RING ADDITIONA L I NFORMA TION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CA LL . THE MANAG ER OR APPROPRIATE DEP AR TMENT HEAD. IN ADDITIO N, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P.M, IM MEDI ATELY PRECEDIN G WED NESD AY'S MEETING IN THE CONF EREN CE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROO M. (1) Pledge of Ailegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Ca ll (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary COM P & MILEAG E .... k.':'." •••• n FILES SET UP .......... ~ .... . RE SOLUTI ON S C ERTIFIED .~ LE TICilS VIRI TT EN .... ~ •• MI NUT ES WRITIEN ... a,.c.'.:. MINUTES ~I LED ..... ~ (4) Consid eration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any . See suppl eme ntal agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT Consi deration of motions approving _minutes of the followin g mee tings, as mailed: M\ '? District 1 July 14, 19 76 regular 11/s District 2 July 14, 1976 r egu lar I H{S District 3 July 14, 1976 r eg ular M.(c, District 5 July 14, 1976 regular -Di strict 6 July 14, 1976 r c:g ula~ ~) 111( '> District 7 July 14, 1976 r egular 111((. District 8 Jwrn 9, 197 6 r egul a r Mf '> District 11 -July 14, 1976 regular (6) ALL DI STR I CTS Fil.£ ---Report s of : TER -(a) Joint Chairman /C .... TKlR - (b) General Ma na ge r -······-·-"-(c) Genera l Cow1 s cl (7) ALL DISTRICTS ., Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of l\cttl CALL vorr ......... -the joint and individual Districts as follows: {Each Director shall ._.,,... . (8) be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See pagc(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "E" . DISTRICT NO. 5 See_pagc(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT KO. 7 See pagc(s) "F" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 8 (A) THROUGH 8 ( v ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requi~ing discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar . :?oil C::ll V,·t" er CJc;t Unanim.:u3 i>:::lct Consideration of action to approve all agenda items nppcaring on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- ·. (8) · (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FIU! ···-···------ LETTER ............•• A/C -TKlR •••. FILE ................. . LETIER ............. . A/C •... TKLR ... . ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, granting a time extension of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company due to delays caused by having to coordinate the work with the Districts' operations. See page "G" (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No.8 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing an addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction Company for purchase of a spare pump impellar. See page "H" FILE ···---(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans LETTER~~ ~~w~,. and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities A/C -~ . l>-~at Fut1e1 Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-ID, and ... vf~:~=-~::.~.~~-:~, -~CD authorizing advertising for bids to be received on Ammst 31, 1976-4:-, · r FILE ••• '::. ......... . t tETTER ·i:_.~~-- A/C .... TKLR ••• ~:~:.':-~~-~- ?o \Le c•,.J, ·········-~··.-·-~---··· ~':-..• L. ......... - LETTER ............ .. A/C .... TKLR .••• G:~~---·· FI LE ···----·-·-· LETTER ···---~---~- A/C ••.. TKLR •••• ~ () ~c q.. . v· ----·-·------............ _ 1 •. FILE -·=--··- lEllER .••• - A/C •••• TKLR ·- \~ ,·. r·a ~ \ ..ii.-::::: •• _.\ •• ---"'-- \t. '.:> i ·1 ~ ; J FJlE..::··-·········· .. 2 . LETTERs •. ;:.:... .. -=. ~-~;;~~~~:~· (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-133, approving plc:i-ns and specifications foT Three~)Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080, jnd authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for an amount not to exceed $50,000. ~' ·''·1 · •. 'n. See page "I" (l.JJ.1 :; \ (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-134, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities, Job No. I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on t\ugu3"~-~r;-l-9-7-6-October 5, 1976 (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-135, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, to Instrumentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc., in the amount of $22,688.00. See pages "J" and "K" (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding puTchase order contract to Stauffer Chemical Company for Purchase of SO~o Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-024, for the price of $.10 per pound for a maximum amount not to exceed $75,000. See'page "L" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-136, accepting Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; anC. approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) (m_E .... x/.. ...... . ______.., ~· ~ - A/C ••••. LR -· FILE ............... . LETTER ........... . A/C .•.. TKLR .. FI LE -·····-·-·-~~!:_ "- A/C .•.. TKLR ·-· FILE ._ .......... -.•• Lm~ .. R~~ A/C .... TKLR ·-· FILE ................. . ~£.~.t.._ A/C .... TKLR •••• FILE ... -........... .. LETTER ..... --·- A/C .... TKL R •••• FILE ·······-- LETTER ···-- A/C .... TKLR ·-· A/C .... TKLR - ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-137, approving Grant of Easement to So uth ern Ca lifornia Edison Compa ny for installa tion of three underground transformer vaults behind the sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundarie s of Plant No. 2, for no fee. See page "N" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation and the Association of Metropo litan Sewerage Agenc ies 'in Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 3-8, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidenta l expenses incurred i n connection with attendance at said meetings (k) Consideration of motion approving waiver of $150.00 quarterly administrative charge to County Sanitation District No. 8 for fiscal year 1976-77 DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-138-2, a uthorizing filin g grant application re feasibility study for sewering Sleepy Hollow- Carbon Canyon drainage agea. See p age "0" (m) Consideration of St an dard Resolution No. 76-139-2, authorizing initiation ·Of proceedings to annex 26.382 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity east er l y of Mesa Drive and Loma Street (Propo sed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to County Sanitation District No . 2) (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 4 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor and Sout~ Santa Ana Rive r Int erceptor Connec.tor, R·eaches 2 , 3 & 4 , Contract No. 2-14-3, a uthori zing an addition of $25,080.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for District and City of Anaheim inter-trunk connections, $7,42 5.00 to be reimbursed by the City for their share of said costs . See page "P" (o) Consideration of motion approvin g Ch an ge Order No . 2 to the p l ans and specifications for Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16 -2 , authorizing an addition of $7 ,0 86 .98 to the contract with Vida Artukovich & Sons , Inc. for additional requirements of Cal Trans for freeway crossing and a l ignment modifications due to und erground utilities. See page "Q" DISTRICT 3 (p) ~:""'" ....... ,_ ~ t> ~· ~ Consideration of Reso lution No. 76-140-3, authorizin g accept a n ce of .Tenmora:ry and Perma n ent Und e r ground Easeme nt from Federa l -Mo gul, Arrowhead Products in connection with construction of t he Wes t s ide Relief Interceptor , Portion of Reach 27 and Reach es 28 & 29, Contract No . 3-21-2, and authorizing p c:.yme nt i n t h e amount of $2, 501. 00 for said easement. See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on p a ge 5) -4- ... ; (8) (CO NSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) FILE ........ .,.·:~-:-:-. ~m-~~ ... !:-:-:" ••••.•• A/C •••. TK LR •••• --····-······- --·····-··- Q. ... ~·-······ ~ ...... ~o oou••••••••• ~-~~ GD .. ·-··--- FILE ·······-··-- LETTER ··········- A/C .... TKLR .••• DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of Reso lution No. 76-141-5, approving Add e ndum No. One to First Amended Joint Exercise of Pow e rs Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Pl a nning Age n cy (NIWA) authorizing inclusion of the City of Santa Ana as a n additional member agency. See p age "S" DI ST RICT 7 (r) Consideration of Resolution No . 76-142-7, a uthorizing accepta nce of Grant of Ea s ement from John D. O'Donnell a n d Partners, for a permanent easement for loca l sewer service southerly of Alton Avenue and eas terly of Red Hill Avenue in the Irvine Industrial (s) (u) Complex area, at no cost to the District. See page "T" Consideration of Resolution No . 76-1 43 -7, authorizin g accept ance of Tempor ary ~nd Permanent Undergr ound Easement from Ne llie M. Reeve in connection with co n struction of t he Tustin-Or an ge Trunk Sewe r, Portion of Reac h 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No: 7-6 -9, a nd authori z ing p ayme nt in the amoun t of $3 ,250 .00 for perm anent easement a n d $2 ,250.00 for temporary easement . See page "U" Considera tion of motion to receive and fil e request from John B. Lyttle, Lemon Heights, for annexation of 7 .849 acres of territory to the Di strict in the vicinity of Ra nch Hill a nd Las Lu ces in the Lemon Hei ghts area , and r e f e r to staff for s tudy a nd reconunenda - tion . See page "V" Conside ration o f motion to receive and file reque st from Bart K. Baker for a nn exat ion of 1 3 . 24 acres of territor y to the DiStrict ·.: in the v icini ty northwest of Pe t ers Canyon Ro ad , adjacent to Sirrine, Mir a Vista and Overhi ll Drives, and r efer to staff for study and recommendation . See page "W" DI STR I CT 11 (v) Consid er ation of mot i on approving Ch an g e Ord er No. 1 t o the p lans and specifications for Manhole Rep l a c ement and Re p a ir, New l and - Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l, auth ori z in g a d e duc t ion o f $1,140.00 from the contract with Rewes-Scho c k, J .V. du e to a r e duc tion of Fibergl ass lining thi ck n ess . See page "X" END OF CONSENT CALENDA R (9) ALL DI ST RICT S Con s ideration of ite ms deleted from consent ca l end a r , if any -5- (10) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: FILE .••...•....••••••• --' (a) (1) ,_LETrER ···'f~---1} A/C .... T~R ·-· /h. j c~ FILE .•...•.•...••••.•• (2) ;{;;':,:;:: oi.~ S ~t.1~.· ', IJ. ~ ... Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding with Orange County Employees Association relative to terms and conditions of proposed transfer from Public Employees Retirement System to Orange County Employees Retirement System Consideration of motion declaring inient to approve transfer of Districts' retirement program from Public Employees Retirement System to the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in accordance with Section 20569 of the Government Code --··-················· (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-144, approving amendment to the Joint Powers Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional Roll Call Vote or Cast Wastewater Solids Management Program agreement, to provide for an Unanimous Ballot increase in the scope of the study and a grant augmentation therefor; I -and funding of the ineligible portion of the ocean disposal studies FILE ···············-· m ~ and authorizing participation in said ocean disposal Studies, as LETTER :~ ... ~J _;j.(' follows: See page "Y" A/C ••.• TKl.R •••• . \ '\l,~~-~t ,·~tfN'_.,.-~,.., .... , . .,.. . Proposed Current Proposed Total Maximum Maximum Maximum CS DOC Proposed CSDOC Increased Share Authorization Authorization Maximum Share LA/OMA Grant Funded Projects Non-Grant Funded Ocean Disposal Study ,: V~..t"·· I -~ '\~~~.}~~.~(!I,,, .. '• .·· ~· • ', ) ($83. 333 CSOOC) $2.0 Million -0- ($141,667) 58,334 (1/3) $3.4 Million $425,000 (12. 5%) $141,667 ($2~_,000 CSDOC) 25,000 75,000 25,000 CSDOC TOTAL INCREASE $ 83,334 1$'h'ER ····-·-····· (" AJc .... TKLR -· .~' Consideration of motion authorizing each Executive Committee member or ···-··············-····· their designee to attend State association workshops and executive -······-·-········· meetings on behalf of the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement in ./ W.S C,cN,'". ~~c_o~.~~c~ with established Board policies FILE ··•···•••••••••••• (12) ALL DISTRICTS LETTER·-·····-···-~+F Staff report re additional hydraulic treatment capacity. See page __ "_Z'_' __ A/C .... TKLR --· ~--- ··---·····················~~3) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report on proposed fiscal year 1976-77 individual District will consider its budget item of the respective District.) (14) ALL DISTRICTS budgets. (NOTE: Each under a separate agenda Consideration of items relative to operation and evaulation phase of the JPL-ACTS process: (a) Staff report. See page "AA" FILE -~.·1···•••HO . .,, ~ . __ .. ,·.ri· ~· . ·(b) TER '•·····-·.....: . . ....,.; . A/C ... ~TKLR ~ '. VL. ~'~.-~-c ; ~r.,-7::'~:~~~--·~( ( ( ) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to proceed with facility modifications to the JPL-ACTS process and continued operation and evaluation of said process through June 30, 1977, subject to written ~pp~oval oJ_thSL_State Water Resources Control Board (Continued on page 7) -6- (1/3) (1/3) (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (c) FILE ...............••• lEmR ·-·- A/C •••• TKLR -· Fllf --·······"•· lETIER ·-··-·-··~ A/C .... TKLR td) Considera tion of motion approving revis ed Step 1 Facilities Plan, Environmen tal Impact Statement a nd Pilot Plant Evaluation budget in the total amount of $4,170,000 and authorizing transfer of up to $489,000 to the Joint Operating Fund from the Operating Fund Unappropri a ted Reserves of th e respective Districts, in accor dance with their proportional participation in the J oint Operating budget, for continued operation and evaluation of said process; and up to $125,000 to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund from the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Reserves of the respectiv e Di s tricts, in accordance with their Joint Works equity percentage participation in the CORF budget, for necessary modifications to the JPL-AC TS process. (NOTE: The above costs will be offset by 87Yi% grant revenue anticipated in 1977 -78.) Considerati on of mot ion authorizing the Gene r a l Manager to employ Part-time Technicians as provided in Resolution No . 75 -1 38, a s amended by Resolution No . 76-24, through June 30, 1977 , in connection with continued operation of the JPL-ACTS process. FILE ··-··-··-····· (e) Consideration of Resolution No . 76-145, authorizing amendment to the r-,._,,........ contract with National Aeronau tics and Space Administration re '---LEJIER ··········11011 Call Vote or Cast JPL-ACTS pr9cess for required servi c es in connecti_on with continued :0·~o us Ballot operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the ?"~ ~~ V" maximum amount fo r services by $75, 000. See page 11 BB" ~ ~ (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-146, authoriz ing amendm ent to the '·· ·•_v-··--··---~11 c 11 v con tra ct with John Caro llo Engineers for require d services in connection r--n:rt-'~...:::.a ote or Cast • h . d . d 1 . f h JPL ACTS ~na ·mo:is Ballot wit continue ope r ation a n eva uation o t e -. proc es s , --··-·OU""' ' 11 .1 7 increasing the max i mum amount for ser vices by $ 75 , 000. See pag e 11 CC 11 I;'.,.;:~;;;_.;..;;...,...-' 'fl /A"'v . (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 ROLL CA LL VOTE ..... __ Roll call vote motion approving 19 76 -77 fi scal year budget (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agend a items, if any (18) DI STRICT 1 Con sideration of motion to adjourn ~: 2 -i. (19) DISTRICT 2 ROLL CALL VOTE .... -Roll call vote motion approving 19 76-77 fiscal year 'bud g et (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and corrununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DI STRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~-~> ? (22) DISTRICT 5 L CALL vorr Roll call vote mo ti on appr oving 1976-77 fiscal year budg et ·····~ -7- (23) DISTRICT S Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach ·City Hall 6·.~3 / (25) DISTRICT 6 \ . , ROtL cAr vorr ...... --Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget /1"'-· ~i.-·~ ~·->~ . , ) (26) DISTRICT 6 '.i ., ,, .. .J) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda i terns, if any ( (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn t · s · """"'"" ;" ..... \..,t__,_ -~~j" \ ~ (28) DISTRICT 8 ROLL CALL vorr Consideration of roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 Operating Fund ---budget . See page "DD" (29) DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn .~·:-~'I (31) DISTRICT 11 ROLL CALL VOTE Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (32) DISTRICT 11 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn~ fc: o~ Pl/t\ ~~-· '' "'·· 2...S' (<4' ~it I~) (-. ..__ ~-"""'- (34) DISTRICT 3 woa CALL vorr. Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (35) DISTRICT 3 FILE ·····--······.~···/·: 111 .-LETrER ..•.•••.•••.•• A/C .... TKLR .••• r..-· , ' ../'' l!llE _;•--··- LEITER···-~< A/C ···:TKlR~i_q ~·:) I i •••••••E-••••••••••"'•••-· .............................. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans (b) and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, authorizing an addition of $14,189.17 to the contract with B & P Construction Company, for extra work incurred as a result of incorrect delineation of water main by Southern California Water Company. See page "EE" Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Counsel to proceed with necessary action against Southern California Water Company to recover extra costs incurred by the District :i.n connection with construction of Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-2, due to the incorrect delineation by the Water Company of 10-inch water line (36) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any --8- (37) ·DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~, .:)..~ (38) DISTRICT 7 ~CALL VOTE ••••• -· Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77, fiscal year budget (39) DISTRICT 7 FILE····--- LETIER ········- Consideration of items relative to proposed Annexation No. 51 - Orange Park Acres Annexation: See page "FF" A/C .... TKLR .•.• (a) Open hearing S ~-.::S c ,·r: [,.)I (b) Presentation of Engineer's Report for proposed Improvement District (j°c,i Questions from staff and directors (d) Report of Secretary on all written protests or objections that have been received, if any /\'ct"'"-~., :. : : (e) Comments from public, if any ''.i\., (f) Close hearing q·. I~ FILE ········-········ "\ ~, (Ltl~ -L'~ LETIER ·····-······· ml'? (g)f'E Consideration of Resolution No. 76-147-7' approving and adopting A/C .... TKLR Roll Call Vote or Cast the Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement District ....................... .JJnanimous Ballot as submitted without modification or change. See page "GG" (40) DISTRICT 7 Fl~ b Consideration of Resolution No. 76-148-7, ratifying condi ticns and ..... n~~J Vote or Cast C:::. Unanimous 8 llot approving agreement with Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, for deferring ~~·I _,.u, (1~,~:' payment of portion of annexation fees relative to Ridgeline/Lazy B . , ~~~--~~~~~-~-~: .. ~= ~!t I ·" Annexation -Annexation No. 55. See pages "HH" and "II" PJL( c~_ lt ··--:+: .. /"":'-• --' ···-·····················~ DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (42) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn c), I 7 -9- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: . JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE AUGUST 11~ 1976 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM~ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD. IN ADDITION~ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 July 14, 1976 regular District 2 July 14, 1976 reg:ular District 3 July 14, 1976 regular District 5 July 14, 1976 regular District 6 July 14, 1976 regular District 7 July 14, 1976 regular District 8 June 9, 1976 regular District 11 -July 14, 1976 regular (6) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See pag~(s) "A" and "D" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page (s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "E" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "F" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (8) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 8(A) THROUGH 8( v) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- • (8) (CONSENT. CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, granting a time extension of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company due to delays caused by having to coordinate the work with the Districts' operations. See page "G" (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No.8 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing an addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction Company for purchase of a spare pump impellar. See page "H" (c) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Foster Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received.on August 31, 1976 (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-133, approving plans and specifications for Three Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for an amount not to exceed $50,000. See page "I" (e) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-134, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities, Job No. I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on August 31, 1976 (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-135, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure ~t Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, to Instrumentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc., in the amount of $22,688.00. See pages "J" and "K" (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding purchase order contract to Stauffer Chemical Company for Purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-024, for the price of $.10 per pound for a maximum amount not to exceed $75,000. See page "L" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-136, accepting Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-137, approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for installation of three underground transformer vaults behind the sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundaries of Plant No. 2, at no cost. See page "N" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 3-8, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said meetings (k) Consideration of motion approving waiver of $150.00 quarterly administrative charge to County Sanitation District No. 8 for fiscal year 1976-77 DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-138-2, authorizing filing grant application re feasibility study for sewering Sleepy Hollow- Carbon Canyon drainage agea. See page "0" (m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-139-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 26.382 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa Drive and Loma Street (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to County Sanitation District No. 2) (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 tp the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 & 4, Contract No. 2-14-3, authorizing an addition of $25,080.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for District and City of Anaheim inter-trunk connections, $7~425.00 to be reimbursed by the City for their share of said costs. See page "P" • (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, authorizing an addition of $7,086.98 to the contract with Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc. for additional requirements of Cal Trans for freeway crossing and alignment modifications due to underground utilities. See page "Q" DISTRICT 3 (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-140-3, authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Federal-Mogul, Arrowhead Products in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reachc~ 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, and authorizing payment in the amount of $2, 501. 00 for said easement. See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT S (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-141-5, approving Addendum No. One to First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA) authorizing inclusion of the City of Santa Ana as an additional member agency. See page "S" DISTRICT 7 (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-142-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from John D. O'Donnell and Partners, for a permanent easement for local sewer service southerly of Alton Avenue and easterly of Red Hill Avenue in the Irvine Industrial· Complex area, at no cost to the District. See page "T" (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-143-7, authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Nellie M. Reeve in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, and authorizing payment in the amount of $3,250.00 for permanent easement and $2,250.00 for temporary easement. See page "U" (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from John B. Lyttle, Lemon Heights, for annexation of 7.849 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ranch Hill and Las Luces in the Lemon Heights area, and refer to staff for study and recommenda- tion. See page "V" (u) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Bart K. Baker for annexation of 13.24 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of Peters Canyon Road, adjacent to Sirrine, Mira Vista and Overhill Drives, and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "W" DISTRICT 11 (v) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland- Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l, authorizing a deduction of $1,140.00 from the contract with Rewes-Schock, J.V. due to a reduction of Fiberglass lining thickness. See page "X" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- (10) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) (1) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding with Orange County Employees Association relative to terms and conditions of proposed transfer from Public Employees Retirement System to Orange County Employees Retirement System (2) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve transfer of Districts' retirement program from Public Employees Retirement System to the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in accordance with·Section 20569 of the Government Code (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-144, approving amendment to the Joint Powers Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program agreement, to provide for an increase in the scope of the study and a grant augmentation therefor; and funding of the ineligible portion of the ocean disposal studies and authorizing participation in said ocean disposal studies, as follows: See page "Y" Proposed Current Proposed Total Maximum Maximum Maximum CS DOC Proposed CSDOC Authorization Authorization Increased Share Maximum Share LA/OMA Grant ($83 • 333 CSDOC) ($141,667) 58,334 (1/3) Funded Projects $2. 0 Mill ion $3.4 Million $425,000 (12.5%) $141,667 (1/3) Non-Grant Funded Ocean Disposal ($2~.ooo CSDOC) 25,000 Study -0-75.000 2s.ooo (I/3) CSDOC TOTAL INCREASE $ 83,334 (c) Consideration of motion authorizing each Executive Committee member or their dcsignee to attend State association workshops and executive meetings on behalf of the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement in accordance with established Board policies (12) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report re additional hydraulic treatment capacity. See page ''Z" (13) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report on proposed fiscal year 1976-77 budgets. (NOTE: Each individual District will consider its budget under a separate agenda item of the respective District.) (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items relative to operation and evaulation phase of the JPL-ACTS process: (a) Staff report. See page "AA" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to proceed with facility ·"-' modifications to the JPL-ACTS process and continued operation and evaluation of snid process through June 30, 1977, subject to written approval of the State Water Resources Contr9l Board (Continued on page 7) -6- {14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (c) Consideration of motion approving revised Step 1 Facilities Plan, Environmental Impact Statement and Pilot Plant Evaluation budget in the total amount of $4,170,000 and authorizing transfer of up to $489,000 to the Joint Operating Fund. from the Operating Fund Unappropriated Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their proportional participation in the Joint Operating budget, for continued operation and evaluation of said process; and up to $125,000 to the Capital Outlay Revolving fund from the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their Joint Works equity percentage participation in the CORF budget, for necessary modifications to the JPL-ACTS process. (NOTE: The above costs will be offset by 87~% grant revenue anticipated in 1977-78.) · (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ .Part-time Technicians as provided in Resolution No. 75-138, as amended by Resolution No. 76-24, through June 30, 1977, in connection with continued operation of the JPL-ACTS process. (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-145, authorizing amendment to the contract with National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process for ~equired services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. See page "BB" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-146, authorizing amendment to the contract with John Carollo Engineers for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. See page "CC" (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 2 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget -7- (23) DISTRICT S Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT S Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hall (25) DISTRICT 6 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 Operating Fund budget . See page "DD" (29) DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items~ if any (30) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 11 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (32) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 3 Roll ca11· vote Ii1otion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (35) DISTRICT 3 (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, authorizing an addition of $14,189.17 to the contract with B & P Construction Company, for extra work incurred as a result of incorrect delineation of water main by Southern California Water Company. See page "EE" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Counsel to proceed with necessary action against Southern California Water Company to recover extra costs incurred by the District in connection with construction of Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-2, due to the incorrect delineation by the Water Company of 10-inch water line (36) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -8- (37) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (38) DISTRICT 7 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (39) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of items relative to proposed Annexation No. 51 - Orange Park Acres Annexation: See page "FF" (a) Open hearing (b) Presentation of Engineer's Report for proposed Improvement District (c) Questions from staff and directors (d) Report of Secretary on all written protests or objections that have been received, if any (e) Comments from public, if any (f) Close hearing (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-147-7, approving and adopting the Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement District as submitted without modification or change. See page "GG" (40) DISTRICT 7 (41) (42) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-148-7, ratifying conditions and approving agreement with Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, for deferring payment of portion of annexation fees relative to Ridgeline/Lazy B Annexation -Annexation No. SS. See pages "HH" and "II" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitatio·n Dist ricts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Augus t 11, 1976 -7:30 p .m. Regu l a r Meeting Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ell is Ave nu e Fountain Vall ey, Cal if ., 9 2708 Tel e phones : Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 The fol l owin g i s a brief explanation of the more important, n o n-routine items which appear on the enc l osed agenda and which are n ot otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant lists are now en- c l osed with the agenda material, summarizing the b ills paid s ince the July Joint Board meeting . J oin t Boards No . 8-a -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No . J-9 -2 Thi s Change Order is a time allowance of 36 ca l endar days fo r t he i nstallation of the extension to surge tower 2 at Plant No . 2. The con t r actor 's delays were associated with Di stricts ' directives to coordinate the work with the Districts ' op e r at ions . The facil ity was op erat ionally complete prior to the expiration of contra ct time limit s ; therefore, the Districts did not sustain any dama ges associated with the delays . The staff recommends accept ance of this change order . No . 8-b -Chan ge Order No . 8 to Contract No . Pl-16 We are recommending the purchase of a spare pump impeller for the influent pumping station at the 46 -MGD Activated Sludge Plant Addit ions at Plant No . 1 . In the origina l proposal sub - mitted by the contractor, the engineer 's est ima t e for this spare par t was estimated to be $5 ,500 . Wh e n the contractor submitt ed his bid , the cost for this spare imp e ller was $25 ,000. This item was not accepted in the original contract, but the pump manufacturer has now offered through the contractor a spare impeller at a cost of $3 ,000 . Spare p ar ts are not grant eligible for State and Federal funding assistance; howev er , staff recommends acceptance of this change order for this needed spare i mpe ll er . No . 8-c -Approving Plans and Spec ifications for Contract No. J -6-lD . I n September , 1974, b i ds were received for the ins t a l lation of two engi ne driv en pumps at the Fo ste r Outfall Booster Station . The .s j.ngle bid rec eived was in excess of the engi neer 's es timate and , bas e d on the staff 's recommendation , the Boa rds rejected the bid rec eived and instructed the staff to proc eed with th e purchase of the engines , pumps and right angle gear drives on separate equipment purchase contracts using our standard public bidding procedures. Plans and specificat i ons have b e en completed for the i nstallation of th e major equipment and staff is recomm e nding th a t bids be re ce ived on August 31 s t. The e ngine e r's estimate for this installation c ontract is $310,000 . The Coastal Commission Permit has been issued for these additions to the outfall booster station . No. 8-d -Approving Pl a n s and Spe cifications for Specifi c atio n No. E-080 . The staff has prepared plans and specifi c ations for the fur - nishing of three gear reduc e rs for the rehabilitation of the Rothrock Outfa ll Pump i ng Station . In May, the Boards approve d the purchase of tw.o "us ed " e ng i nes a nd one new engine to provid e a dd i- tional hors e power r e q u ired t o meet the increas ing pumping r e quir e - ments at th e outfall b o oster station. Th i s project i s for the purchase of the t hre e gear. r e ducers ne c essary for this i nstallation . Jt is recommended t hat t he General Man age r be aut h orized to execute a contract f o r a total amount not t o e xceed $50,000 . This authorizat i o n is requ e sted. to e xpedit$ purchase and delivery o f the equipment . (Est i mated 20 -week delivery time ) . No. 8 -e -Approv i n g Pla ns a n d Sp ec ifica t ions f o r Job No . I-4-lR. This bud g eted p ro ject f o r the r ep lacem e nt of the existing g as sph e r es a t P l a nts Nos . 1 and 2 i s estima ted a t $500,000 . Th e present gas s t o r age sphere s have dete rio rated to a p oi n t t hat they cannot b e c e r t i f i ed as pressure v e sse l s a nd, t h ere f o r e , c anQ ot be op e ra te d by th e Dis t ri ct s. Th e two e xi s ting spheres ea ch have a volume o f a p p r oximate l y 17,000 c ub i c fe e t and a re 34-feet in dia- me t e r f o r a t otal s t or age o f 3 4,000 cu bic f ee t . The n e w sp h eres will b e 4 6-fee t in d i ameter and h ave a p r essure r ati n g o f 60 ps i and a total stor age capacity of 1 00,0 0 0 c ubi c feet . Wi th the compl e tion of t h e Activat e d Slud g e Ad d it i o n s a t P lant No . 1 and the n e w engin e driv es a t the ou t fall boos t e r stat ion, th e sludge g as s t o rage fac i lit ies wil l b e n e c essury t o store t h e f u e l to mee t the se e nergy requir e me nts . Appro v a l o f these plan s a nd ·sp ecifi ca- tion s is r ecommend ed a nd the b i d d a t e t o be est ablis hed a s Au g u s t 31st i s sugges t e d. . . No. 8-f -Con side r a ti on of Aw a r d of Job No . PW -05 2 -Au tomatic Gat e Op e r a t o r s . Bids we r e r e c eived Au g u st 3rd fo r the furnishin g and installa- tion of sev e n automat i c gat e o p erat or s at the P l a n t No. 1 Div e r s i on Structur e . Three bids we r e rece i ved ran g ing f ro m a l ow o f $22 ,688 to a high of $29 ,500 (engin eer 's es tima t e $4 5 ,000 ). S t a ff r ecomme nd s ·award of thi s c o n t r ac t to th e l ow bidder, In s t r ument a tio n and Mechanical S ystems, Inc . of Fullerton, in the a mount of $2 2,688 . -2 - No. 8-g -AwardinW Purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Sp e cification No. P-02 . On August 3rd, the staff received bids for caustic soda to b e used in the odor control scrubbers in service at the treatment plants . The low bidder, Stauffer Chemical Company, i s fully com - petent to supp l y the required materia l , and it is recommended that a two -year purchase order contract be awarded to them at 10¢ per p o und, FOB treatment p l ants , with a maximum contractual amount of $75 ,000 . No . 8-h -Accepting Job No . P2 -8 -8 as Complete . $165,663.81 The recently constructed street improvements on Brookhurst Street , adjacent to Plant No . 2, are complete and have b ee n accepted b y the City of Huntington Beach . The contractor has complied with all of the provisions of the contract and staff recommends accept - ance of this job as complete . The action app.earing on your agenda authorizes the filing of the Not i ce of Completion. No. 8-i -Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company. With the installation of the street i mprovements on ~rookhurst Street , adjacent to Plant No . 2, the City , in conjunction with the So u thern California Edison Company, install ed the street lights and the underground conduit as required. The Edison Company has i nsta l led three underground transformer vaul ts behind th e sidewalk which will be in future landscaped areas . The Edison Company has r equested an easement on Districts' property to install these transformer vaults . The staff reco~ends granting of this easement to the Edison Company at no cost. No. 8-j -Attendance at Concurrent Meetings of Wat e r Pollution Federation (WPCF) and Association of Metropolitan S e werage Ag e ncies (AMSA) in Minneapolis, October 3 -8, 1976 . Di rectors and staff members have been active in both the WPCF and AMSA. Their conferences' and manufacturers ' exhibits have proved to be extremely valuable to the Districts . The General Manager will be attending through previous authorization to parti- cipate in AMSA meetings as National Director and Vice President . It is recommended that the Boards authorize the Joint Chairman, or in his absence the Vice Joint Chairman , and two staff me mbers to attend these meetings since they provide an excellent forum for discussions with participants inc l uding State and EPA officials. -3- No. 8-k -Waiver of District No. 8 Administrative Fee to the Joint Administrative Organization. Currently District No. 8 pays to the Join t Administrat ive Organizatiori a quarterly administrative fee of $15 0 . No. 8 is an inactive Sanitation District covering the areas of the Ci t y o f Laguna .Beach and South Coast County Water Di s t rict (forme rl y Sout h Laguna Sanitary District). Current funds ava i l ab le to Di s t r ic t No. 8 are less than $1,000, and it is anticipa t ed· t hat i f ag r eemen t s are concluded with the District No. 8 member a g e nc i e s an d Al is o Water Manageme nt Agency (AWMA), it may be d esi r eable for Di s tri ct No. 8 to be dissolved. The staff is recommen d i ng.t h at bec a u se o f the lack of activities in District No. 8, the Jo i nt Boards aut h orize the suspension of the quarterly administrat ive fee for the purpose of using these funds for dissolving the Dis t ric t when a nd if t h e ,Directors of District No. 8 so determine. District No. 2 No. 8-1 -Authoriz i ng. Application for S t ep I Gr ant f o r Feasibility Study -Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Can yon Ar e a . Last month the Board authorized partic ipat ion of Di st ric t No. 2 as the lead agency for obtaining a F acil i t i e s Pla n/Enviro n- mental Impact Report, Step I g rant, for the purpo se o f de vel o pi ng a f eas ibi l ity plan t o provide sewera ge f a ci lities f o r the S l eepy Hollow-C arb o n Can yon area. The resolut i on a p p e a r i n g i n this agend a authorizes the pr e parat ion o f t he forma l g r an t . It i s recommended that Re so l ution No. 76 -13 8-2 b e a p p roved. No. 8-m -I nit iat i o n of Anne x at i o n Procee dings -Tract No . 8885 -G . L. L e wis Co mp a n y . G. L. L e wis Co mpany h as re quested anne x ation of 26 .4 ac r e s in the vi c init y easterl y of Mesa Dr ive and Lom a Stre e t in t he Cit y df Orange . Th e o wne r h a s f ile d t he n ecessary doc u men t ation a n d ha s d epos i ted t h e ·mo n ey to ini t i a t e ann e x at i on . The de v e l o p me n t i s in c onforman c e wi t h the l a n d u se plan s i nc o rporated within t he Di s t r ict's Master P l a n for this a r ea . The staff r ecommend s t hat the Bo a r d a d opt Reso lut io n No . 7 6 -1 39-2 i n i t i a ting annex a ti o n proc ee ding s. No. 8-n -App r o v i n g Ch a n g e Order No . 4 to Co n t r ac t No . 2 -14-3 . At the time the pla n s were p r e pare d fo r t hi s por tion of t he S a nt a Ana Rive r I nterc e ptor fro m La Pa lma Avenu e a nd Gr6ve Street to th e intersection of La Pa l ma Ave n ue a nd Impe ri al Highway , por- t i o n s of f u t u re master p l a n inte rc e pt o r s e wers we re c o ns ide r e d, sp e ci f i ca lly t h e Ri c hfi e ld an d Orcha r d S ubt runks. Ho wev e r, these subt r unk exte n s i o n s we r e n ot includ e d whe n t h e o rig i na l bids we r e r e c ~i ved , at t h e req u es t of t h e S t a t e a nd EPA . The Ci t y of Anaheim h a s r e qu ested tha t the futur e trunk f a cilit i es of the City be -4- installed and connected to the Santa Ana River Interce ptor. The construction of these "stub out" extensions of the future Districts' subtrunks and for connections to the City of Anaheim facilities would minimize future construction in three intersections. These "stub outs'' and City's extensions are in La Palma Avenue at Rich- field Road, Kellogg Drive and Fee Ana Street. Th is total change order in the amount of $25 ,080 is recommended for approval . The Anaheim City Council has approved the City's portion of $7,425 . The balance of $17,655 is the Districts' obligation and is not grant eligible. No . 8 -o -Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 2-16 -2. This change order provides for nine items of construction which include additional requirements from Cal Trans for the Orange Freeway crossing . The State requirements, which are basically for additional joints, protective fencing and realignments, were not a part of the original contract and constitute a change. Also included in this change order are mod ific at i ons of alignments of grades to avoid conflict w~th the underground utilities , specifi- cally storm drains and major City water lines in the area. Staff recommends acceptance of thi·s change order totalling $7 ,086.98 including a time extension of an additional three calendar days to the contract . District No. 3 No. 8 -p -Acceptance of Sewer Easement for Contract No. 3 -21 -2 . The action appearing on your agenda authorizes acceptan ce of a sewer easement from the Federal Mogul Compan y for the installa- tion of a portion of the Westside Relief Interceptor between Katel l a Avenue and Cerritos in the City of Los Alamitos. At the July Meeting the Board accepted two easeme nts , one from the ow ners of the Los Alamitos Race Track and the second from the owner of the property from the Santa Fe Railroad to Cerritos Avenue . As reported in July, the owners of the Federal MGgu l had agreed in principal to th e conditions of the easement and have now executed the neces - sary documents for this sewer easement. Staff recommends acceptance of this grant of easement and the payment of $2,50 1 for the permanent and temp orary easem~nts set forth in the documents. District No. 5 No. 8-q -Approving the City of Santa Ana as an Additional Member Agency in NIWA . We have been r equested by the Newport -Irvine Waste -Management Planning Agency (NIWA) to approve Addendum No . One to the First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Planning Agency, to authorize inclusion of the City of Santa Ana as an additional member agency. The staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 76 -141-5, for inclusion of the City of Santa Ana. -5- Di strict No . 7 No. 8-r -Acceptance of Sewer Easement . Reso l ution No. 76 -1 42 -7 accepts an easement for a loca l sewer, c on structed in a p rivate street souther l y of Alton Avenue and easterly of Red Hill Avenue in the Irv i ne Industrial Complex area. It is recommended that the easement be accepted at no cost to the District . No. 8-s -Acceptance of Sewer Easement for Contract No . 7-6 -9 . Th i s item authorizes acceptance of a sewer easement from Ne l lie M. Reeve for the installation of a portion of the Tustin - Orange Trunk Sewer in the v i cinity of Hewes Street and Katella Avenue. This acceptance authorizes the payment of $3,250 for the permanent easement and $2,250 for the temporary easement required f or the construction of this trunk sewer. The owner has previous l y consented to a Right of Entry and this portion of the Tustin-Orange Trunk is installed and the total project is nearing completion. Staff recommends acceptance of this easement and payment made in accordance with the terms o~ said easement prepared by the General Counsel. No. 8-t -Request for Annexation -John B. Lyttle . A formal request for annexation of approximately 7.8 acres i n the Lemon Heights area in the unincorporated territory of District No . 7 has been received. It is recommended that this request be referred to staff for report and recommendation to the Board . No . 8-u -Request for Annexation -Bart X . Baker . The District has received a forma l request for annexation of 1 3 .24 acres located northwest of Peters Canyon Road adjacent to Sirrine Drive, i n .the unincorporated -territory of District No. 7 . It is recommended that the matter be referred to staff for report a n d recommendation to the Board . Di strict No . 11 No . 8 -u -Approving Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 11 -lR-l. This contract is for the restoration of 35 manholes by apply - ing a fiberglass lining on the interior of the manholes to abate the sulfide corrosion of the concrete . Thi s process and procedure h as been developed by the Districts ' staff in conjunction with the contractor and the initial specifications required four applicat i ons of the fiberglass material for a total of 1/2 inch of lining material . After two years of utilizing this method for repair of manholes , i t has ·been determined that a 3/8 inch lining will be sufficient and it is recommended that this will be included in all future specifi - cations for this type of repair . The contractor has offered a deduction of $1 ,140 to comply with the new proposed requirements to provide a 3/8 i nch lining in lieu of the req u ired 1/2 inch lin i ng . Staff_ recommends acceptance of this proposal. · -6- All Districts Nos. 1 0 and 11 -Executive Committee Report and Recommended Act i ons. Enc losed in the Directors' packages i s a separate repor t from the Executiv e Committee relative to matters to be considered under Agenda Item No . 11. No. 12 -Ad ditiona l Hydraulic Treatment Capacity. At the July meeting, concern was expressed by several Directors that we are reaching the hydraulic capacity of the Joint Works Treatment Facilities . The designed rate of capacity is 18 4 mgd and pres ent flows are 176 mgd . Enclosed in the supporting documents is a staff · rep ort detailing increased capacity modification considera- tions . which would allow the Di strict s to satisfactori l y treat addi - tiona l flows of approximately 20 mgd in conj un ction with p lanne d secondary treatment facilities. The staff will be prepared to discu ss this concept in mo.re detail a ·t Wednesday 's me et ing . . No. 13 -Proposed 1 976 -77 Budgets. Enclosed are th e budget recommendations for this fiscal year. The Executive Com mittee commented on the proposed b u dge t s in their report under Agenda Item No . 10 . Anyone re quiring additional information or having questions concerning the budge t recommend a - tions , p l ease call Fred Harper or Wayne Sylvester . (5 40 -2910) No . 14 -Operation and Evaluation Phase -JPL/ACTS Process . The Di stricts have recently received a $600 ,000 amendment to the or i ginal Step I grant contract of $3 .5 millio n for the prepa - ration of the all-inclusive Fac ilities Plan, accompanying Environ- mental Impact Report and for the construc tion and evaluation of the JPL/ACTS Treatment Facility. Based on this new funding, the staff has prepared a budget for the completion of the Facilities Plan/Environmental Impact 'Report and for the operation and eva lua- tion of the JPL/ACTS process for ten months through June 30 , 1977 . It is the staff 's ~ecommendation that the Boards a ut horize the re commended actions appearing in the agenda, subject to written approval from the State Water Resources Co ntro l Board to assure receipt of the 87~% grant funding . A report~ which is on Page "AA'' in the supporting documents, provides a s ummary of the budget for u tilizati on of the authorized grant funds . District No. 5 No . 24 -District No . 5 Adjournment to August 12th. Chairman Mcinnis is requesting that an adjourned meeting fo r District No. 5 be scheduled for 5 :00 p .m., August 12th in the Council Chamb e rs at the Newport Beach City Hall . The Board will be considering the need for sewer s erv ic e for the coastal area between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach . -7- District No. 3 No. 35 -Change Order No . 1 to Contract No . 3-21 -2 . During the installation of this portion of the Westside Relief Interceptor near the F l ood Contro l District Carbon Creek Chann el , northerly of Myra AvPnlle . the contractor dug into a 10 -inc h water main of the Southern Cali forn ia Water Company which requir ed extensive repair and additional work due to floo ding of the entire construction site . Our sewer design eng ineer had ide n- t ified this water line in accordance with the As -Built plans of the Water Company, and the contractor was digging pursuant to the instructions of the Water Company who had marke d the alignment of the 10-inch water line on the existing pavement for further clari- ficati on . The water l ine was encountered approximately 15 -feet from the designated location. It is the staff's recommendation that the contractor be reim- bursed for this extra wo'rk which was do ne on a force account basis pursuant to the contract specifications, in th e amount of $14 ,1 89 .17 , and that the General Counsel be author ized to pursue the recovery of all costs associated with this change order from the Water Company . District· No. 7 No. 39 -Actions on Proposed Annexation No . 51 -Orange Park Acres Annexation . The General Counse l has submitted h i s comm e nts on thi s agenda item in the form of a let t er to th e Board dated Augus t 5, 1 976 , (see supp ort in g agenda documents page "FF "). As of this writing it does not appear that the Orange Park Acres annexat i on proposal wi ll mak e the Novemb er ballot . Mr. Woodruff, therefore , recommends that all required ma tters be scheduled in order for t h e proposal to qualify for the March bal lot . Th e actions o n the agenda are rec ommended . No. 40 -Appro v ing Agreement with Lazy B Gol f Course for De f erring Payment of Certain Annexation Fees . At th e July meeting, the Board authorized the deferment of annexati on fees on 4 2 .74 acres of territory proposed to b e annexed to the District . The fo llowing are the rec ommended conditions for deferrin g payment: a . Payment of the deferred portion of the annexa- tion fees shall be paid imm ed iately when (l)· the prop erty is transferred to another own er , or (2) development, or (3) seven years after the date of District 's Resolution No. 76-48-7 (8 -11-76). b. Payment of the deferred fees wi ll be secured by a lien or other e nc umberance on the prop er ty . -8- c. The amount of the fees due the Di s trict at the time of payment s h al l be in accordance with the f ee schedule then in effect for annexation to the District. It is the staff 's recommendation that the Board au thor iz e execu - tion of an agreement with the Lazy B Golf Course owners in accordance with the aforementioned conditions. Fred A. Harper General Mana ger -9- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 5, 1976 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 5 THURSDAYJ AUGUST 12J 1976 -5:00 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACHJ CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of August 11, 1976, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss sewerage service by District No. 5 for the down-coast area. II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. 5 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12J 1976 -5:00 P.M. NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 5.C0-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (3) Discussion and consideration of policy relative to sewerage service by District No. 5 for the down-coast area. (See enclosed staff report) (4) Other business and communications, if any (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn \..omprom1se nan tor lrv~ne Coast Adopted · County Planners Urge More Open Space , r-------____:_,, ·1 1 1Los 21 ngdrs I 11nes m l 0, 150 Acres Between Newport, Laguna BY DALE FETHEHLING \' ORANGE COUNTY Times Stall Wroler \ SANTA ANA -A compromise plan for de,·elopinl? the 10,150-acre Irvine CC PART 11 t Coast land was appro\'ed Tuesday by the County I'lanning Commission: WEDNESDAY. AUGUST 4. 1976 Commisioncrs \'Oted fl to 0 to call for more public W'C and open space than that urged by the Irrine Co. but l0ss than that sought by many conservationists. " The proposed general plan amend- ment now goes to the Board of Super- visors on Aug. IS for a final decision. The issue is perhaps the most exten- sive land-use question the county harl had to grapple with in one decision. Estimates of the value of the property range as high as SlOO million. The commi~sion 's decision comes about a year after the Irvine Co .. owner of the entire parcel, unveiled its proposal for the 3.5-mile-long unde- veloped site bet ween Corona de! 1Iar and Laguna Beach. The firm urged a residential, commerical and resort (hotels. restau- rants and shops) development having a population of almost 50,000 in 20 to 30 years. About 65% of the open hilly area would be left in open space, pro- vided some public agency would buy it. However, the commission, after a long series of hearings and the amass- ing of pounds of documents. opted Tuesday for a different version -prepared hy county staff. That plan foresees about 38.000 residents and 75% open space. It also would shift development away from Pacific Coast Highway and away from the Laguna Beach end of the parcel and push it more toward the San Joaquin Hil:s ridgclinc. The idea. the 'staff said, is to preserve ocean views from Coast Highway, lessen the project's impact on the road, and re- flect recent state and local acquisition proposals. Thus, for example, the number of privately developed "resort" areas near the coast was cut back from a total of three to just one at Crystal Cove. Cer- tain proposed residential areas were moved f urthcr inland. But unsettled questions remain. For oi1e thing, government purchase of 1,050 acres -including most of the acreage seaward of Coast Highway - hinges on the re~ults of a $280 million bond issue on the No\·embcr b:11lot. Another state purchase of 1.300 acre:> for a park is hc·ld up by an Irvine Co. stockholders' suit. . Als0, a UC Irvine-led study on how Orange County should deal with the Laguna Greenbelt has not yet been releascd.1'he greenbelt is an unoff 1c1:ll protectorate cncompa::sing much of the southea~tern Irvine Coast. Some conservationist groups, like Friends of the Irvine Coast. ha,·e argued for public purchase of .the whole 10,000 acres. Others, such as the League of Women Voters and the Laguna Grrenh0lt Inc .. had sought a ban on development southeast of ~[oro Canyon and more open ~pace th:m that reflected in the staffs proposal. After months of hearmgs, Tuesday's . meeting was anticlimatic. The commission's fondness for thr staffs plan had surfaced earlier, and there was little advoc<lcy Tuesday by PLAN FOR ~RVINE COAST Continued from First Page the Irvine Co. or others for a different alterna- tive. Instead, dozens of supplemental policies aimed at guiding eventual development were debated. Those policies cover everything from ways to protect marine water quality to the need to educate eventual homeowners on how to keep their domestic pets from harassing wildlife. More importantly, the policies also placed, for <'xample, requirements on the In•inc Co. for donating rights-of-way for roads in the area and :-:et time periods after which lands to be-labeled open space -if not acquired -might be de-· Ycloperl. The adopted land-use plan. road plan, policies and envil'Onmental impact report now go to the ~upervisors. lf approved, the county general p.Jan thus would be changed to reflect the overall development concept._ ~ . Specific construction plans would be submitted much later and would have to be consistent with the. general plan. (Company officials say it \ \ \ probably will ·be 1979 or 1980 before any devel-·· opment will begin.) . · Coastal commission approval _: if the Legisla- ture extends the life of that agency or creates a successor -also will be required for both the development concept and specific building plans. A major question in the county deliberations has been the effect of the project on traffic. The supervisors recently gave conceptual approval to a San Joaquin I Iills "corridor," or freeway-type route, along the ridge which would serve the south county in general and the Irvine Coast project as well. In the plan approved.by the planning commis- sioners, extension of Culver Drive and San Canyon Road to Coast Highway also are foreseen in addition to local roads serving the site. Another auestion is what city will seek to incorporate the area. Newport Beach, Irvine and Laguna Beach about the irvine Coast site, and the Local Agency Formation Commission, which oversees annexa- tions, later this month will hold hearings to redefine the cities' spheres of influence. \ ,,.,,,,~-1--·---........... __ .......... \ --..,-··-•• L..-·' I .. f"'----· r-,/ Signal Peak 10 --••• / ·/,,4 lj .... , __ / ,t_l} " h \, Corona Del Mor I:; c -1 / J "-... ' .. i~ ·1' ,,-~<J , · '... Peli<on Hill '!:;; j c., ' \ oc:- 2 / / •JO!:-' , 0 '1:-.... :s \e -1 J/~O .~ )1 9.( .~ .: .. ir \\ 1"'"-0 /"!"o ,,l ,' Abalone Point c:-""' ~ ·· COASTLAND-Shaded area shows the l 0, l SO-acre Irvine Coast project. · Times map by Gus Keller ·~ · r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) August 5, 1976 NOTICE TO THE BUILDING COMMITTEE Norman Culver, Chairman John Burton Francis Glockner Beth Graham TELE PH ON ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 RE: Committee Meeting 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 11, 1976 Chairman Culver has asked us to notify you that there will be a meeting of the Committee at the above hour and date immediately preceding the Regular Joint Meeting. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. and a light dinner will be served. Material for discussion purposes is being mailed under separate cover. cf.:;~r?!~ General Manager ,-:~ . : ·: .,._ . ~. RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AUGUST 11, 1976 -7:30 P.M. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID .JULY 20, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~0344 30345 30346 30347 30348 30349 30350 30351 30352 30353 30354 30355 30356 30357 30358 30359 30360 30361 .. : "3'03-62 30363 30364 j l50365 30396 30367 30368 30369 . 30370 30371 30372 30373 30374 30375 ---30376 30377 30378 30379 30380 30381 30382 30383 30384 30385 30386 30387 30388 30389 30390 30391 30392 ~0393 ...__.J0~94 30395 30396 30397 "A-1" Alex Fish Company, Lab Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearing Material Allensworth Company, Sight Dome American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals (MO 12-10-75) American Kleaner Mfg Co., Inc., Truck Parts City of Anaheim, Power V. B. Anderson, Truck Parts Banning Battery Company, Batteries Beckman Instruments, Controls W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage . C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair CS Company, Valves Cals Cameras, Photo Supplies R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage Civic Center Lock & Safe, Lock Repair Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance, Employee Bond Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orange, Training Meeting County Wholesale Electric, Supplies Mr. Crane, Equipment Rental Crane Packing Company, Engine Repair Culligan Deioninzed Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence Cunnnings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Daniels Tire Service, Tires C. R. Davis Supply Company, Hardware Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Filter Supply Company, Filters Fischer & Porter Company, Valves Fess Company, Lab Supplies Compressor Products .Division of Garlock, Compressor Parts Garrett Industrial Supply Company, Cleaners General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal Graphic Controls, Chart Paper Griffith Company, Regrade Manhole Hasty Lawn & Garden, Hedge Trimmer Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts City of Huntington Beach, Plant #2 Water Hurley Electronics, Inc., Lamps Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement .Irvine Ranch Water Districts, Line Cleaning Water Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Plastic Sheeting LBWS, Inc., Safety Equipment, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Acetyl~ne L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 53.00 262.76 23.17 22,625.07 90.59 147.27 8.80 240.73 646.20 16.65 695.00 386.25 74.22 5.40 4.00 6,162.00 101.18 160.86 6,194.20 241.56 70.00 103.80 244. oo· 206.01 40.00 12.00 309.48 262.54 349.80 175.00 67.60 421~97 100.70 268.74 39.43 2,279.36 41.34 945.00 22.54 1,400.00 205.96 300.00 743.51 434.09 597.96 850.62 303 .16 213.55 968.19 19.56 189.19 207.65 217.90 1,515.85 "A-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30398 30399 30400 30401 30402 30403 30404 30405 30406 30407 30409 30410 30411 30412 30413 30414 30415 ·~ ~;~g.:~~ 30418 .. 3o'4f9 . ~30420 30421 30422 30423 30424 -30425 30426 30427 30428 30429 30430 . 30431 .30432 30433 30434 30435 30436 30437 30438 30439 30440 30441 30442 30443 30444 30445 30446 Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware $ McCalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Multiquip, Inc., Equipment Parts National Chemsearch, Odor Control Chemicals City of Newport Beach, Water Orange County Water District, Basin Equity Replenishment Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Red Valve Company, Inc., Expansion Joint Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Altnninum Routh Transportation, Oil Removal Santa Ana Electric Mo tors, Electric Motors Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Seal Methods, Inc., Pump Packing Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools, JPL Vacuum Sherwin-Williams Company, Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee.Mileage Sims Industrial Supply~·safety Glass Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern California Edison, Power Southern California Costal Water, 1976-77 Deposit Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Drinking Water Standard Concrete Material, Concrete State of California, Department of Transportation, State Permit Inspection Sur.veyors Service Company, Office Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement Bruce J. Taylor, Employee Mileage Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Steel Union Otl Company of California, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Delivery United Riggers and Erectors, Engine Unloading Unites States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Materials Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Service, EDP Services Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Everett H. York, Engine Parts AMOUNT so 36~ 524.70 40.81 9.50 1,100.28 68.02 246.98 9.81 386.76 303.48 180.13 23.70 1,083.97 956.09 381. 85 . 106.93 80.38 428.24 94.82 43.38 25.14 395.00 5,371.07 86,600.00 186.56 92.08 33.06 32.05 233.64 41.46 1,051.60 1,450.81 82.20 14.32 666.63 279.84 132.96 . 34. 26 43.86 220.60 431.42 2,524.50 16.20 59.22 4,186.95 1,490.27 289.59 $ 164,40~5 "A-2" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS "A-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 CAPITAL OlITLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. lN PAYOR OF ~0341 Hasty Lawn & Garden, Groundskeeping Equipment 30342 Safety Service and Supply, JPL Filters 30343 Valve and Primer Corporation, Retention J-6-1 II A-3" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 303.22 213.17 13,696.05 $ 14,212.44 $ 178.,620.20 "A-3" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30336 City of Anaheim, Right-of-way Processing 2-14-4 30337 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3A, 2-14-4A DISTRICT·NO. 2 "ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30338 Estate of Frank Vessels, Jr., Right-of-way 3-21-2 30339 Henrietta Visbeek, Right-of-way 3-21-2 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30340 City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration "B" AGENDA ITEM # 7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUI'-"' 250.00 864.96 $ 1,114.90 $ 4,601.00 5,000.00 $ 9 ,601. 00 $ 1,370.00 "B" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3·, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~30490 A-1 Metal Services Corporation, Control Panel 30491 AAA-Fremont Bag & Salvage, Building Materials 30492 Advance Business Forms, Computer Paper 30493 Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings 30494 All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings 30495 American Chemical Society, Periodical 30496 American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts, Gaskets 30497 American Society for Testing, Catalog 30498 The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing 30499 Associated Concrete Products, Grade Rings 30500 Charles M. Bailey Company, Inc., Valve Parts 30501 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuilt Magtronic 30502 Thomas G. Brisco, Employee Mileage 30503 Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Employee Exams 30504 C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair 30505 Cals Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies 30506 Castle Controls, Inc., Valves 30507 Coast Insurance Agency, Fire Insurance Premitnn ·30508 Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware 30509 College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials ·30510 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies 1 (i 1 · ·30511 F. B. Cook Corporation·, Manhole Repair 30512 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 30513 County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies 30514 Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies 30515 Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies 30516 Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies 30517 Enterprise Printing, Printing ·30518 Fischer & Porter-Company, Regulator Parts 30519 Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-way Mapping 30520 Edward R. Francis, Employee Expense Reimbursement, Pl-16 30521 General Telephone Company ··· · ·30522 HMK Marketeer Limited, Electric Cart Parts -~Q523 Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tubes 30524 House of Batteries, Batteries 30525 Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts & Repairs 30526 City of Huntington Beach, Water 30527 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water 30528 Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Tools 30594 Keenan Pipe and Supply, Pipe 30529 King Bearing, Inc. , Coup lings,· Bearings, V Be 1 ts 30530 Kirst Pump & Machine Worics, Pump Parts 30531 Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies 30532 LBWS, Inc., Acetylene, Oxygen 30533 L & N Uniform Supply Conpany, Uniform Service 30534 Life Security Systems, First Aid Supplies 30535 Los Angeles Times, Subscription 30536 A. J. Lynch Company, Janitorial Supplies 30537 McCall a Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts ~0538 . McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL ~0539 Mobil Oil Corporation, Petroleum Products 30540 National Lumber Supply, Building Materials 30541 City of Newport Beach, Water 30542 Nolcx Corporation, Specification Supplies "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 309.52 275.63 207.72 117. 00 128.88 12.00 708.55 7.09 232.47 101. 76 138.03 112.16 17.70 26.00 485.00 89.64 . 80.56 7,500.00 200.49 325.82 1,238.50 140.14 310.13 51.90 13.46 31.80 528.61 104.52 1,282.01 1,757.80 138.23 220.'40 87.62 52.83 370.44 516.30 10. ll 121.48 46.64 143.58 319.31 479.20 382.94 335.16 593.16 515.39 49.00 109.07 63.07 5,239.16 74.76 18.79 5.27 227.42 "D-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 .JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. 30543 30544 30546 30547 30548 30549 30550 30551 30552 30553 30554 30555 30556 30557 30558 30559 30560 30561 ?. :<:· 30562 30563 '"~:: ·30564 '1 i .:~ ·3·0565 30566 30567 30568 30569 .. 30570 30571 ---·30572 30573 30574 ---·30575 . --·30576 30577 ~'" 30578 30579 -30580 30581 30582 30583 30584 30585 30586 30587 30588 30589 30590 30591 30592 30593 "D-2" Office Equipment Company, Calculator Repair Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp Oreo Block Company, Inc., Concrete Blocks Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Industrial Supply, Tools Pacific Telephone M C Patten Corporation, Instrumentation Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Actuary Service Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Postmaster Quality Building Supply, Plastic Cement, Silica Sand RFL c/o Luscombe Engineering, Controls The Register, Bid Notice P-024 The Republic Supply, Pipe Fittings Rewes-Schock, JV, Contractor 11-lR-l Robbins & ~t·ers, Pump Parts Ryan Herco, Lab Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motoi: Repairs Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools Shepherd Machinery Company, Conveyor Repair Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies Southern California Edison, Power South Orange Supply, PVC Pipe Southern California Gas Company, Natural Gas Southern California Water Company, Water Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Drinking Water Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline Sun Electric Corporation, Fan Parts The Suppliers, Tools Surveyors Service Company Tatkin Company, Regulator C.O. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene Title Insurance & Trust Company, Title Report 7-6-9 Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Gauges Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Exhaust Fan Repair United Parcel Service, Delivery Unites States Elevator Corporation, Maintenance Agreement United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Van Waters & Rogers, Caustic Soda Warren and Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fittings Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Western Salt Company, Salt Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies Zellar's Cycle, Bicycle AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 48.4~ 13.30 424.48 1,378.22 85.48 349.79 496.04 354.68 700.00 324.82 500.00 779.43 76.11 20.00 774.03 8,416.58 336.73 58.97 233.05 134.79 401.85 415.73 2,794.78 580.64 51,594.42 9.81 2,471.32 3a74 20.99 232.45 7.48 31.64 413.05 114.00 90.63 67.76 50.00 186.00 38.47 615.50 113. 08 8.07 33.00 3,107.41 2,033.24 116.17 155.74 114. 88 185. 71 262.9r ~ .. $ 108,429.61 "D-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 CAPITAL OtrrLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~0344A Beverly Pacific Corporation, Contractor PW-047 3034SA Burling Instrument Company, Temporary Controls 30346A Calgon Corporation, Activated Carbon, JPL 30347A John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, JPL 30348A County of Orange, Compaction Testing P2-8-8 30349A Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16 303SOA Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment 30351A Fleming Construction, Contractor P2-8-8 30352A General Electric Supply, Recording Meter 30353A J.B. Gilbert & Associates, Facilities Plan EIR 30354A Isco Company, Instrumentation 303SSA Imperial Oil & Grease Company, Grease JPL Maintenance 30356A McCalla Brothers, Contractor PW-049 30357 A Mine Safety Applicances Company, Safety Equipment 30358A NASA-Pasadena Office, Release Retention, JPL 30359A Pepsi Company Building Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent 30360A Ramsey Engineering Company, Field Service, Weighveyor JPL 30361A The Register, Bid Notice PW-052 30362A Smith Emery, Pipe Testing Pl-16 30363A Truesdal, Scrubber Emissions Testing, JPL 30364A F.T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2 "D-3 11 AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 2,135.81 58.03 4,134.00 1,489.65 631. 96 446,260.20 340.85 701.18 916.90 21,124.84 1,774.14 212.96 3,784.14 195.89 48,019.40 254.40 805.13 98,97 13.00 1,750.00 4,500.00 $ _539, 201. 45 $ 647 ,631. 06 "D-3" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCillnJLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30452 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 30453 Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2 30454 Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Equipment Rental 2-14-3 & 2-14-S 30455 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5 30456 J. Putnam Benck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 30457 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4 30458 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-3 and 2-16-2 30459 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14~3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5 30460 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 DISTRICT NO. 3 .. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS 'IN FAVOR OF 30461 B&P Construction, Contactor 3-21-2 30462 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2 & 3-21-1 30463 AG Tutor Co., Inc., & NM Saliba Company, Contractor 3-20-2 30464 Henrietta Visbeek, Right-of-Way 3-21-2 $ $ AMO UN~ 294,138.00 79,880.38 2,248.75 690.97 2,572.00 286,775.50 8,984.00 6,527.25 237 ,321. 76 919,138.61 163,225.80 . 260.74 11,132.00 2,001. 00 . $. 176,619.54 ·DISTRICT:No~ 5 "ACCUMULATED.CAP!TAL'OUTLAY.FUND WARRANTS 'IN FAVOR OF 30465 Archaeological Research, Inc., EIR Survey 5-20 $ 100.00 "E" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS "E" - INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~RRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30466 Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way Mapping FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30467 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-9 30468 Sully Miller Contracting Company, Contractor 7-6-9 "F" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 1,322.75 83.38 73,037.88 $ 73,121.26 $ . 74,444.01 II F II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE · FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. __ __... ________________ __ :ONTRACTOR: F. T. ZIEBARTH COMPANY DATE July 31, 1976 JOB: Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2 Job No. J-9-2 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DE DUCT) $ 0 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or =ontract work are hereby authorized dnd as compensation therefore, the following additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 'I'he Contractor, though performing his work in a di lige.nt manner as outlined in Section 6-1 of the General Provisions, experienced construction difficulties which necessitated an additional 36 days of working time. No change in Contract amount. Contractor's work is in accordance with Section 6-6 "Time Completion and Liquidated Damages." Operational completion date of J.une 18 was prior to. original contract time limit. Contract Time Adjustments Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion rate Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date February 26, 1976 120 Calendar Days June 26, 1976 36 Calendar Days 36 Calendar Days 156 Calendar Days July 31, 1976 Original Contract Price $ 73,000.00 ·Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 board authorization date: August 11, 1976 By --------------------------------------Consulting Engineer By -------------------------------------Contractor ____ Th J s . Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 73,000.00 Approved: ·-----COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By --------------------------------~ Chief Engineer "G" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE · FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. ____ s ________________ _ .~omRACTOR:~~OO~No_v_m~oo~N-~_R_U_CT~Ia_N~co_.~o_F_~_II_N_NE_~s_ITT~A~~-DATE July 1, 1976 -----------------~----~--~ ~JOB: ____________ 4_6~MG_D __ A_c_t_i_va_t_e_d __ s_1_ud_g_e __ P_l_an~t, __ J_o_b __ N_o_._P_l_-_1_6 ______________________________ __ Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (f)~ij~~i) $ 3,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or =ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follOVJing additions to or aeductions from the contract price are hereby approvcdo Furnish spare parts for Aeration Influent Pumps 1. Spare impeller 2. Extra packing for four (4) pumps 3. Two extra lantern rings 4. Special tools Lump sum 3,000.00 TOTAL·ADD: 3,000.00 No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price $ 29,876,000.00 Board authorization date: August 11, 1976 Consuiting Engineer By--------------------------~-------Con tractor Prev. Auth. Changes $ (31,979.14) This Change (ADD) (D!D.U'Cf) $ 3,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 29' 84 7' 020. 86 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange Countyi California By--------------------~~~--~-Ch i e f Enginee II H" AGENDA ITEM #8CB) -ALL DISTRICTS II H II II I II RESOLUTION NO. 76-133 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TI1REE GEAR REDUCERS FOR REHABILITATION OF ROTHROCK PUMPING STATION, SPECIFICATION NO.E-080 A RESOLlITION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY·, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THREE GEAR REDUCERS FOR REHABILITATION OF ROTHROCK PUMPING STATION, SPECIFICATION NO. E-080 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of Collllty Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief Engineer · for THREE GEAR REDUCERS FOR REHABILITATION OF ROTHROCK PUMPING STATION, SPECIF!- CATION NO. E-080, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Heal th and Safety Code of the State of California; and) Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to receive bids and award purchase order contract for an amotlllt not to exceed $50,000; and, Section 4. That said bids will be received until 11:00 a.m., August 24, 1976, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(n) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II B I D TABULATION SHEET D~ te August 3, 1976 11:00 a.m. Contract For: AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS, DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT RECW1ATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW'-052 1. 2. 3. II j II BIDDER Instrumentation and Mechanical Syste.ms, Inc .. Fullerton Skipper & Company Midway City Signal Hill Electric, Inc. Fountain Valley TOTAL BID $22,,688.00 $29,850.00 It is recommended that award be made to Instrumentation and Mechanical Systems, Inc., Fullerton, California, in the amount of $22,688.00. W. N. Clarke Superintendent I concur in the above recommendation. AGENDA ITEM #8(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II j II "K" RESOLUTION NO. 76-135 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR AlITOMATIC GATE OPERATORS, DIVERS ION STRUCTURE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-052 A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l; 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS, DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-052 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Instrumentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc. for AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS, DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-052, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said job, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That award of contract for Job No. PW-052 to Instrumentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc. in the amount of $22 ,688. 00 .for said work in accord- ance with the terms and conditions of the specification and the bid proposal therefor is hereby approved; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract for said work, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds are o:rdered returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II K" B I D TABULATION S H E E T Date August 3, 1976 11:00 a.m. Contract For: . PURC.HASE OF 50% CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION SPECIFICATION NO. P-024 BIDDER · TOTAL BID 1. Stauffer Chemical Company Los Angeles 2 • Georgia.:. Pacific Corporation · City of Conunerce 3. Van Waters & Rogers (subject to .Price & freight escalation) Los Angeles 4. Dow Chemical Pasadena $. 10/.1 b. $.101/lb. $.101/lb. No Bid .It is recommended that award be made to Stauffer Chemical Company, Los Angeles, California, in the amount of $.10/lb. for a maximum total amount II L" not to exceed $ 75, 000. - IJJ?l ~ W. N. Clarke Superintendent I concur in the above recommendation. Engineer-- AGENDA ITEM #8(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II L" RESOLUTION NO. 76-136 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-8-8 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-8-8 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE. AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Fleming Construction, has completed the construction in accordance with the tenns of the contract for BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN TI-IE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, JOB NO. P2-8-8, on the 31st of July, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' -Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the tenns of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, is herehy accepted as completed in accordance with the te~ms of the contract therefor, dated April 29, 1976; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of Distr1ct No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Corr.pletion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Fleming Construction, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of said job, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. "M" AGENDA ITEM #8(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "M" . "N" RESOLUTION NO. 76-137 AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO EDISON CO. AT PLANT NO. 2 FOR TRANSFORMER VAULTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUN"fY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AT PLANT NO. 2 FOR UNDERGROUND TRANSFORMER VAULTS * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of ~ounty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO ~EREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated wherein an easement at Treatment Plant No. 2 in the vicinity of Brookhurst Street and Bushard Street in the City of 'Huntington Beach for installation of three underground transformer vaults behind the easterly sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundaries of Plant No. 2, is hereby granted to Southern California Edison Company; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is here?y granted for no fee; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be authorized and directed to execute said easement on behalf of itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(1) -ALL DISTRICTS II N" RESOLUTION NO. 76-138-2 AUTIIORIZJNG FIL ING GRANT APPLICATIONS RE SLEEPY HOLLOW-CARBON CANYON AREA A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AU1110RIZING FILING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR PUBLICLY OWNED WASTE- WATER TREATMENTS RE SLEEPY HOLLOW-CARBON CANYON AREA AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 2, an Application for Federal Assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,· as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive a grant under said act and a state grant under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974 for construction of wastewater treatment works; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 2 hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if grants for i~s project are made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and state statutes, it will comply with all ap~licable state and federal statuatory and regulatory requirements, including but not limited to the Assurances contained in the Federal Grant Application and the State Grant Contract, 1be Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended, relating to the right of the public to obtain information and records, The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, U.S.C. 470 et seq., as amended, relating to the preservation of historic landmarks, The Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act, 18 U.S.C. 874, 40 U.S.C. 276c and the regulations issued thereunder, 29 CPR 3.1 et seq., and The Contract Work Hours .and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 327 ct seq., and the regulations issued thereunder. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. "O" AGENDA ITEM #8(L) -DISTRICT 2 II O" --'W". ~ • • -• ... • .. • ••• --• .. ~ .. -.... ' .. -• --• -• , •••• -----• • • • P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE • FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. an<l John A. Artukovj ch, Jr., a Joint Venture, assignee of C.O. N0. _______ 4 ____________ __ er· "TRACTOR: .John A. J\rtukovich Son~ Inc. DATE~/\~1;_;.j1g:...;t~1s.:...it.__..1_,,,._10._7._r,._) ______ _ ~ SANTA ANA IU VEI{ !NTEJ~CEPTOJ~ SH/ER J\.'JIJ sourn SA\JTA Ai'JA RIVER INTEI~CEPTOR CONNECTOR, JOB: RE/\r.llES 2 3 ft 4 Contract No. 2-14-3 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (llEOUCT) $ 25,080.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following. ·changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item A: Item B: Reference: For extension of proposed Richfield trunk and Orchard trunk out of the inter- section of La Palma and Richfield (Station 7 31+95) and Kellogg and [a Palma (Station 7 90+ 46) so that future trunk sewers can be constructed minimizing disruptions to the conununity. Cost $17,655.00 For work requested by the City of Anaheim to be paid for by the City of Anaheim for connections to the District's facilities at Stations 802+07 and 735+81. Cost $7,425.00 Districts letter to Contractor dated 12/2/75; Contractor's letter to the Districts dated May 18, 1976; City of Anaheim's letter to the Dis.tricts dated October 17, 1975, and Districts letter to the City of Anaheim dated June 24, 1976. Contract Time Adjustments: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. October 15, 19 75 -380 Calendar.~Days October 29, 1976 20 Calendar-Days Revised Contract Time 400 Calendar Da Revised Completion Date Nov. 19, 1976 Original Contract Price $ 3. 8 J 4 , 4 6? OQ Prev. Auth. Changes $ ___ (~3~·~7~00~·~0~0~) ____ _ This Change (ADD) ~8.l\UD..1\) s ____ 2s~,~0_8_0_.o_o ______ _ Amended Contract Price $ :; . 8 3 5 z 84 2 • () 0 Board authorization date: August 11, 1976 Approved: By ----------------~----~:----:::~-:----Consulting Engineer By---------------------------:---------Con tractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By-------------------------=-Ch i e f fngineeL II P" AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -DISTRICT 2 "P" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. nox 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE • FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc. 11155 Rush Street C .O. N0. ___ 2 ______ _ .:ONTRACTOR: South El ~.fontc. CJ\ DATE August 4, 1976 JOB: YORBA LINDA FORCE M.\IN -Contr~ct 2-16-2 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ''OEQUOf) $ 7,086.98 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follQ\.r/ing additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. References: Invoices 50-1 thru 50-10, and correspondence between Contractor and Districts during Ma:r:ch, April and May, 1976. For: Additional costs for bond for Highway Encroachment permit, additional fencing required by Cal Trans, ~nd for utilities interference requiring adjustment in alignment and/or grade of force main. Also a request for .a Time Extension of 3 calendar days because of the above stated delays. Costs: Bond and fencing -$1,634.51 Construction changes -$5,452.47 Total -$7,086.98 Contract Time Adjustments: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: August 11, 1976 January 29, 1976 180 Calendar Days July 27, 19 76 3 Calendar Days 33 Calendar Days 216 Calendar Days September 1, 1976 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~DlmNcr.~) Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 660,287,98 $ 11, 000. 00 $ 7,086.98 $ 678,374.96 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of 0 range County, .. Ca 1 i forn i a By--------------------------~--------Consulting Engineer By--------------------------------------By---------------------~---~--~--Ch i et Enginee1 Contractor "Q" AGENDA ITEM #8(0) -DISTRICT 2 II Q" II R II RESOLUTION NO. 76-140-3 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM FEDERAL- MOGUL, ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS RE CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT UNDERGROUND EASEMENT FROM FEDERAL- MOGU L, ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO. 3-21-2 * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of C~unty Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement dated , wherein an easement in the vicinity of Katella Avenue and Denni Street extended for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 3, is hereby accepted from Federal-Mogul, Arrowhead Products; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of ~each 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2; and, Section 4. That payment in the amount of $2,501.00 for said easement is hereby authorized; and, Section S. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be authorized and directed to record said easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(p) -DISTRICT 3 II R II "S" RESOLUTION NO. 76-141-5 APPROVING NIWA ADDENDUM NO. ONE AUTHORIZING MEMBERSHIP FOR CITY OF SANTA ANA A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. S OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. ONE TO FIRST AMENDED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREAT- ING NIWA, AUTHORIZING TI-IE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS AN ADDITIONAL MEMBER AGENCY OF TI1E NEWPORT-I RV I NE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING AGENCY * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated March 28, 1975, as amended, the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) has heretofore been created; and, WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has requested inclusion as a party to said agreement and member of the Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency; and, WHEREAS, said agreement provides for admission of new members. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Addendum No. One to the revised Fir~t Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA), providing for the inclusion of the City of Santa Ana as an additional member agency of the Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA), is hereby approved in accordance with the conditions set forth in said addendum; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute said addendum to said agreement authorizing inclusion of the City of Santa Ana, as provided in Section 1 hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(Q) -DISTRICT 5 II s II "T" RESOLUTION NO. 76-142-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM JOHN D. O'DONNELL RE OFFSITE SEWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM JOHN D. O'DONNELL AND PARTNERS, IN CONNECTION WITH OFFSITE SEWER LINE SOUTHERLY OF ALTON AVENUE AND EASTERLY OF RED HILL AVENUE IN THE IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX AREA * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated June 4, 1976, wherein an easement located southerly of Alton Avenue and Easterly of Red Hill Avenue in the Irvine Industrial Complex area for offsite sewer service is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from John D. O'DoQnell and Partners; and Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(R) -DISTRICT 7 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 76-14 3-7 AUTllORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM NELLIE M. REEVE RE CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNlY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM NELLIE M. REEVE CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain Grant of Easement dated , wherein -------- an easement in the vicinity of Hewes Avenue and Katella Avenue for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Nellie M. Reeve; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted in connection with construction of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16°, Contract No. 7-6-9; and, Section 4. That payment in the amount of $3,250.00 for said Grant of Easement and the amount of $2,250.00 for temporary easement is hereby authorized; and, Section S. That the General Manager be and is hereby authorized to execute an Entry Permit for Sewerline Construction and Agreement re Purchase and Sale of Temporary and Pe1manent Underground Easement relative to acquisition of said casements. Section 6. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. "U II AGENDA ITEM #8Cs) -DISTRICT 7 II u II "V" i}!/101zJ£eight:s June 29, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Request is hereby made to annex 7.849 acres to County Sanitation District No. 7 per the attached map and description, "Annexation No. -Tract No. 8295 (Recorded) Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County." The territory within the proposed annexation is owned by: Lemon Heights, A Joint Venture 100 W. Main Street, Suite 9 Tustin, California 92680 The assessed value of the area within the proposed annexa- tion, as shown on the last preceding equalized assessment roll of Orange County is $22,594.56. The area of the proposed annexation is uninhabited, there- fore there are no voters residing in the territory proposed to be annexed. Our check for $325.00~s enclosed to cover the cost of processing the annexation. Please note that Tract No. 8295 is scheduled to record within the next three weeks and the book and page numbers of its recordation will be added to the map and description immediately thereafter. Your early consideration of this matter will be greatly appreciated. "' John B. Lyttle \. 9 JBL:rnrc Encl. 2001 RACQUET HILL. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92705 AGENDA ITEM #8(r) -DISTRICT 7 (714) 832-0271 "V" "W" Bart I<. Baker 1092 St. John Place Santa Ana, California 92705 July 28, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District # 7 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 Gentlemen: This is to request annexation of our property located northwest of Peters Canyon Road, adjacent to Sirrine~Drive, to County Sanitation District # ?. It consists of 13.24 acres for which the legal description and map have already been filed. The legal owners are Bart K. and Anna F. Baker, 1092 St. John Place, Santa Ana, 92705, Phone 544, 6569. The assessed value for this parcel for 1975/76 was $le,950, and there are no voters residing on it. Yours truly, /J~k.~~ Bart K. Baker Enclosures 3 AGENDA ITEM #8Cu) -DISTRICT 7 "W' - ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. Oo BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE · FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. I ----~-----------------~ :ONTRACTOR: _____ R~E_W_ES_-_s~c_HO~C~,K_. __ Jv _______________________ __ DATE July 26, 1976 !OB: Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-JR-1 Amount of this Change Order. (».no) (DEDUCT) $ (1,140.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or =ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follaHing additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approvedo Reference: Letter from Rewes-Schock dated 5/28/76 Letter to Rewes -Schock from"Districts dated 6/}1/76 Revise Fiberglass lining thickness from 1/4" ·thickness to 3/16" thickness. Original Contract Price $ 37,253.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ -------------------0.00 This Ch~nge (l\'QD) (DEDUCT) $ (1,140.00) Amended Contract Price $ 36, 113. 00 Board authorization date: August Ll, 1976 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County; California By ________ ~-------------------------By--------------------~~~~~--Ch i e f Enginee Con tractor "XII AGENDA ITEM #8(v) -DISTRICT 11 II X" RESOLUTION NO. 76-144 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO LA/OMA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMEND- MENT TO JOINT.POWERS LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA REGIONAL WASTEWATER SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT INCREASING SCOPE OF SAID PROGRAM, AND APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN OCEAN DISPOSAL STUDIES * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, . DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain amendment dated to the Joint Powers Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program agreement dated October 9, 1974, providing for an increase in the scope of the study to include non-sewerable (industrial) waste and.municipal sludge studies, and a grant augmentation therefor, and funding of the ineligible portion of ocean disposal studies and authorizing participation in said studies, is hereby approved and authorized; and Section 2. That revision of the funding authorization and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's (CSDOC) maximum share of said funding is hereby approved as follows: Grant Funded Maximum Local Maximum Grant Funded Studies Total Cost Sha:ce Agency Share CSDOC Share Current Authorization $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $250,000 $ 83,333.33 Proposed Increase 1,400,000 1,225,000 175,000 58,333.33 $3,400,000 $2,975,000 $425,000 $141,666.66 "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "Y-1" Non-Grant Funded Grant Funded Maximum Local Maximum Ocean DisEosal Studies Total Cost Share Agency Share CSDOC Share Current Authorization $ -0-$ -0-$ -0-$ -0- Proposed Increase 75,000 -0-75,000 25,000~00 Revised Authorization $ 75,000 -0-75,000 25,000.00 Revised Grand Total $3,475,000 -0-$ 500,000 $166,666.66 Section 3. 1bat the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. I are hereby authorized to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "Y-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of OHANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. DOX 8127 August 5, 1976 S T A F F R E P 0 R T 10844 ELLIS AV£NU[ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71-4) 540-2910 JOINT WORKS TREATMENT PLANT HYDRAULIC CAPACITIES (714) 962-241 I At the present time, the Joint Works Treatment Plants have a rated capacity of 184 mill ion gallons per day. This treatment plant capac)ty is based upon primary treatment design rates and that of facilities that are in operation. The Districts are presently under design for 121 mil lion gallons of secondary treatment facili- ties. These secondary treatment fa<;:i 1 ities wi 11 independently meet the NPDES requirements. The current average daily flows which the treatment plants are treating are approximately 176 mill ion gallons a day. Therefore, there are approximately 50 mgd of the present flows which are not planned to receive secondary treatment at this time. The State Water Resources Control Board has offered to approve a Step II construc- tion grant for the preparation for the Plans and Specifications for this additional 50 mgd of secondary treatment. The staff of the EPA in San Francisco has indicated that they are not in concurrence with the State on this SO mgd increment of second- ary treatment until the final publication of the Environmental Impact Statement which is scheduled for March of 1977. The Districts' staff has expressed concern on hydraulic capacity required to meet the increasing flows which will be required at the Joint Works prior to the completion of these secondary treatment facilities and, because of long delays in current procurement, it would be necessary to commence design as soon as possible prior to the completion of the EIS. Because of the state of flux and the apparent disagreement of the State and the EPA on the aforementioned SO mgd improvements, the Distr.icts staff, in discussions with both regulatory agencies, has received verbal approval to increase the hydraulic capacity at Plant #2, and possibly Plant #1, by the installation of new headworks pumping units, piping facilities and modifications to certain hydra u 1 i c structures i n . the p 1 ants . This increased hydraulic capacity consideration would change the design concepts of the primary treatment facilities for those structures that are fol lowed by secondary treatment. These rrodifications would al low the Districts to· satisfact- orily treat approximately 20 mill ion gallons of additional fla.1s without instal- lation of conventional primary treatment facilities at this time. The State and EPA are concurrently trying to resolve the matter of 50 mgd of improved treatment at Plant #2 and response to the Districts answer to this request should be forthcoming before September 1. Pending the results of the State and EPA decision on this secondary treatment increment, Districts staff is continuing to pursue formal acceptance of the hydraulic modifications as outlined above. It is felt that a definitive report can be made at the September 8 board meeting that the Directors can consider to meet the hydraulic requirements of Districts, as well as the NPDES regulations. REL:jea "Z" AGENDA ITEM #12 -ALL DISTRICTS "Z" August ·4, 1976 s·r AF F STEP I FACILITIES PLAN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALlf"OHNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENU[ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 ~ (714) 962-2411 In April, 1975, the Districts received a $3.5 million Step I Grant to prepare a Facilities Plan, Environmental Impact Statement and to evaluate the JPL-ACTS Process. The State Water Resources Control Board, in issuing this Grant, had reservations regarding the inclusion of the efforts associated with the JPL-ACTS process evaluation because they felt the funding for this 11 research 11 should not be included in the construction grant program. On June 13, 1975, the State granted permission for the Districts to place orders for the major equipment for the JPL Pilot Plant with the option to cancel these orders pending development of further information. On August 22nd, the State, after reviewing supplemental information, instructed the Districts to proceed with the construction of the 1-MGD Pilot facilities. In the latter part of September, the contractor commenced site preparation and proceeded with the installation of the 1-MGD facility. In March of this year, the facility was essentially complete and the initial "shake down" operational phase commenced. In May of this year, the operational mode was established. On July 2nd, 1976, the initial operational phase was concluded as previously agreed with the State and EPA. Interim evaluation reports, both on the process and on the 1-MGD facility, are being prepared by staff, JPL/NASA personnel and John Carollo Engineers. The State, and particularly the EPA are extremely complimentary over the efforts of the Districts, not only in the methodology used in implementing the construction phase, but as to the results to date on th~ process itself. Districts have received an amendment to the original Grant Contract extending the amount to $4. 1 million. Based on this new funding limit, the following budget has been prepared to complete all the tasks as outlined in the Grant conditions. A summary of this budget is as follows: STEP 1 FACILlTIES PLAN GRANT I. Construction (Pi lot Plant) I I. Technical Services a. Facilities Plan b. EIS c. Public Participation d. Pi lot Plant I I I. Administration a. Pi lot Plant Operation IV. Legal/Fiscal V. Contingencies TOTALS Cost to 6/30/76 $2,436,558 273,131 54,250 21 , 645 702,054 0 600 0 $ 3 ' 118 8 , 2 3 8 Estm. Cost to complete $ 125 '000 20,769 130,750 15,000 150,000 200,000 2, '•OO 37,843 $ '681 , 762 "AA-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS $4, 170 ,.000 "AA-1" Staff Report Page Two August 4, 1976 To complete the evaluation of the JPL effort, the Districts have been requested to operate this facility through June 30, 1977. It is, therefore, recommended that the Board take the following actions regarding this extended effort: a. Approve necessary budget transfers as required. b. Extend the General Manager's authority to employ part-time technicians to provide the necessary operating personnel through June 30, 1977. c. Amend the NASA contract fo"r required services during this operational phase for an amount not to exceed $75,000. d. Amend John Carollo.Engineer's contract for the required services in connection with the continued operation and evaluation in a maximum amount not to exceed $75,000. REL:hje "AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "AA-2" RESOLUTION NO. 76-145 AMENDING CONTRACT WITH NASA RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS, TO PROVIDE REQUIRED SERVICES FOR CONTINUED OPERATIONAL PHASE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The· Boards of Directors of County Sanita~ion Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain amendment dated to the ~~~~~~~~~ contract by and between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and County Sanitation District No. 1 re the JPL-ACTS process, authorizing increase in the maximum amount for· services from $353,726.00 to $428,726.00 to provide required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of said process, is hereby approved and accepted; and · Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said amendment on behalf of itself· and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. "BB II AGENDA ITEM #14(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "BB~ RESOLUTION NO. 76-146 AMENDING CONTRACT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING EXECUTION or AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS, TO PROVIDE REQUIRED SERVICES FOR CONTINUED OPERATIONAL PHASE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain amendment dated , to the ~~~~~~~~- contract by and between John Carollo Engineers and County Sanitation District No. 1 re the JPL-ACTS process, authorizing increase in the maximum amount for services from $255,000.00 to $330,000.00 to provide required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of said process, is hereby approved and accepted; and Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. "CC" AGENDA ITEM #14CF) -ALL DISTRICTS II cc II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.~ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS FUND Operating DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE Directors Fees Contractual Services -Share of Joint Operating Professional Services Printing & Publication Payable to Joint Operating for Prior Years Travel & Meeting -Directors TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Less: Cash Carry-Over & Revenue Funds Available July 1 Budgeted ~cquirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income & Transfers Cash Carry-Over Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 200,433,680 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 190,411,9~ 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $No Tax Ra~ ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $No Tax Rate APPHOVE'D /\PP ROVED BUDGET BUDGET 1q74175 1975/76 600 400 600 600 465 365 350 200 100 100 2, 115 1,665 1,991 124 124 2, 115 1,665 -0--0- ESTIMATED ACTUAL XPENDI TURES q r: _ 7f. 250 . 600 1,665 875 790: 43 833 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 400 100 75 205 53 833 833 833 -0- "DD" AGENDA ITEM #23 -DISTRICT 8 11 DD'1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE · FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER '-..-1 C.O. NOo ______ ~l _______________ _ ·:oNTRACTOR: B & P CO~STRUCTION C0~·1PA'JY DATE_A_u...,g_u_s_t_4_._l_,_9_,_7_6 ______ _ Westside Relief Entcrceptor, Portion of Reach 27 & Reaches 28 & 28 ·oa: Contract No. 3-21-2 Amount of this Change Order. (ADD) (Dc:rnJW) $ 14, 189 .1 7 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or =ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or ~eductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Reference: Inspection report dated June 15, 1976 Contractor's invoice dated July·6, 1976 Letter to Southern California Water Company dated June 17, 1976 For: Clean-up, reconstruction_ of the Districts 24" VCP sewer caused when 10" water line belonging to SCWC broke, flooding excavation at approximate Station 43+63 between Carbon Creek Channel and Myra Avenue on Denni Street. Water line was depicted on the plans in accordance with the information supplied by the Water Co. which was given to the District's consultant during design of the project. However, the water line in actuality was something different. Costs: $14, 189.17. Water Co. will be billed for this. An additional 10 days will be required to complete these ·repairs. Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date April 29, 1976 240 Calendar Days December 29, 1976 10 Calendar Days. 10 Calendar Days . 250 Calendar Days January 7, 19 77 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) l~ Amended Contract Price ooard authorization date: August 11, .1976 Approved: $ 1, 1 77' 7 4 5 • 00 $ ____ o_. o_o __ _ $ 14, 189. 17 ----------------~ $ 1 , 1 91 ' 9 34 . 1 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County; California Consulting Engineer By----------------------------~----By --------------------------------------Chief Enginee, Contractor II EE II AGENDA ITEM #35(A) -DISTRICT 3 II EE II "FF-1" Law Offices Thomas L. Woodruff 1055 North Main Street, Suite 1020 Santa Ana. California 92701 August 5, 1976 Area Code 71 ~ 835-6212 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Orange Park Acres Annexation-Agenda Item #39 Gentlemen: The agenda item for consideration by the Directors at this meeting is to hold the hearing to consider protests or objections, if any, to the engineer's report which has been filed pertaining to the installation of necessary improvements related to the annexation. The Board of Directors has set this hearing by the adoption of a reso- lution at its July 14, 1976 meeting,· and the approval of the engineering report is necessary before proceeding further with either the·annexation proceedings or the formation of the improvement district. As the Directors are aware, the property owners in the Orange Park Acres area, acting through the Orange Park Acres Association, have been required to deposit-all necessary monies to pay expenses incurred by the District in processing the request for annexation, the formation of the improvement district, and all matters relating thereto. As of this date, there have been sufficient monies deposited to pay all expenses, including engineering, legal and District staff time, up to the present point of the proceedings. A meeting was held between the under- signed, Wayne Sylvester and a representative of Orange Park Acres on July 19, 1976, wherein it was indicated that the sum of approximately $5,500.00 would need to be deposited with the District to cover all remaining expenses contemplated to complete the annexation election. These expenses would include $2,500.00 for bond counsel, $1,500.00 to the County Registrar of Voters for the conducting of the election, $1,000.00 for legal and engineering fees by the District staff and its General Counsel and $500.00 for AGENDA ITEM #39 -DISTRICT 7 "FF-1" "FF-2" Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 August 5, 1976 Page Two miscellaneous outside expenses, such as preparation of election materials. As of this date, we have not yet received the deposit of the additional sum of money and have been advised that we will not likely receive it prior to the Board meeting. In view of this and the direction-of the Directors not to expend any monies or time unless payment therefor is guaranteed by the applicants, only minimal efforts have been expended by the staff to process this matter through the election proceedings. Additionally, the legal requirements for the calling of and holding the special election are such as to make the pos- sibility of a November ballot extremely remote. In view of this, I have discussed it with the representatives of the Orange Park Acres Association and they agree with the recommendation of my office and of the General ~anager that the matter not be scheduled for the Novewber election, but instead to schedule all required matters in order to qualify for the March ballot. The remaining procedures to be accomplished by the District and the proponents are as follows: 1. For the District to adopt a resolution declaring its intent to form an improvement district, including setting a hearing to hear protests or objections relating thereto. 2. To adopt a resolution calling a special election for purposes of submitting the ballot proposition for annexa- tion to the District, the approval of the improvement district, and the issuance of bonds. 3. If the election is called by the District, the Executive Director of the Local Agency Formation Comir.ission prepares an analysis of the election ballot proposition and LAFC must approve of the analysis not less than fifty-four days prior to the election. It is therefore recommended by this off ice and the staff that the hearing on the engineering report be held as scheduled AGENDA ITEM #39 -DISTRICT 7 "FF-2" "FF-3" Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 August 5, 1976 Page Three at the August 11, 1976 Board meeting and the resolution be adopted if the Directors so deteYmine. Thereafter, the District staff will attempt to have the proponents prepare the necessary remaining paperwork, together with payment of $5,500.00, in order to continue processing the application and schedule the resolution of intent to form an improvement district for the September Board meeting with the resolution calling the election at a possible November or December Board meeting. · ~~- Thomas r.:. l-.Joo.dru~ 7 '."' General Counsel TLW:ab AGENDA ITEM #39 -DISTRICT 7 "FF~3" RESOLUTION NO. 76-147-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SUBMITTED WITHOUT MODIFICATION OR CHANGE. ORANGE PARK ACRES IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: ·WHEREAS, on July 14, 1976, pursuant to the order of this Board, there was presented to and duly considered by it a sanitary report entitled Engineer's Report -Orange Park Acres Improvement District & County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, dated May, 1976; WHEREAS, following said consideration, said report was ordered filed with the Secretary of said Board and a time and place for hearing objections to said Engineer's Report was fixed as August 11, 1976, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California; WHEREAS, notice of said hearing has been given in the time and in the manner provided by law and as ordered by this Board, and persons appeared and presented objections to said report; and WHEREAS, this Board has heard all persons desiring to be heard, and has duly considered all matters relating to said "GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #39(G) -DISTRICT 7 "GG-1" report, and it appears and this Board finds that the public interest and general welfare will be served by adopting said report without modification or change. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED AND ORDERED that said report be, and it is hereby, adopted and approved as a whole, without modification or change. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held on the --- Of I 1976 day "GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #39(G) -DISTRICT 7 "GG-2" "HH-1" RESOLUTION NO. 76-148-7 A RESOLUTION OF TllE 1301\RD OF DIREC'l'ORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOHNIA, RATIFYING CONDITIONS AND APPROVI~JG AGHEE:1EN'l' W!'rII LAZY B GOLF COURSE, A PARTNERSHIP, F'OR DEFERRING PAYMENT OF A PORTION 01-' ANNEXJ\'l'ION FEES RELATIVE TO RIDGELINE/Ll\ZY D ANNEXATION -ANNEXATION NO. 55 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors at its regular meeting held on July 14, 1976, adopted Resolution No. 76-131-7 authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings for that certain property owned by Lazy B Golf Course and Lazy B Estates, Inc., and WHEREAS, such Resolution of authorization was conditioned upon the execution of an agreement between the property owners and the District relative to the deferring of a portion of the annexation fees; and· WHEREAS, the District Directors have reviewed the agreement approved by the property owners and reconunended by General Counsel for the District: NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That certain agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved for execution by the Chairman of the District; Section 2: The following conditions for annexation re- conunended by District Staff are hereby ratified and approved: A) A portion of the total District annexation fees for 42.74 acres of the annexed territory is authorized to be deferred for later payment, B) Payment of the deferred portion of the annexation fees shall be paid in full immediately upon the earliest occurrence of ony of the following events: (1) transfer of the property to a new owner, other than a holder of a financing security interest, (2) development for use other AGENDA ITEM #40 -DISTRICT 7 "HH-1" "HH-2" than open space or the golf course-driving range, or (3) seven (7) years from date of this Resolution, C) Payment of the def erred fees shall be secured by the execution of all necessary instruments and documents to provide a security lien or other encumbrance upon the subject property, D) The amount of fees due to the District at time of payment shall be in accordance with the fee schedule then in effect for the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 11, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #40 -DISTRICT 7 "HH-2_" AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of August, 1976, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "District"), and LAZY B GOLF COURSE, a partnership (hereafter referred to as "Lazy B"). WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 have approved the initiation of annexation proceedings at the request of Lazy B s-ubject to certain conditions relating to the deferring of payment of a portion of the District annexation fees; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree: · 1. The parties agree that the Ridgeline/Lazy B Annexation known as Annexation No. 55 shall be initiated and proceised according to law. 2. The.total annexation consists of 107.88 acres. 3. The amount of annexation fees, pursuant to the schedule in effect at the time of application to the District, due to District is $ 53,935.92 , based on a rate of $828.00/acre for 65.14 acres. "II-1" AGENDA ITEM #40 -DISTRICT 7 "ll-1" ·4. District No. 7 hereby agrees to defer the obligation of Lazy B to pay the sum of $828.00 plus those fees as escalated per paragraph 5 below (for 42.74 acres) to District until the occurrence of any of the following, whichever occurs first: A. Development of any part of the property for which the fees are deferred, by a use other than the existing golf course and driving range. Upon development the entire amount deferred shall be due and payable. B. Transfer of ownership of the property from Lazy B to any party other than the holder of a security interest solely for financial purposes or to a person or entity consisting solely of the same persons presently owning Lazy B. c. Seven (7) years from the date of this Resolution (August 11, 1983). 5. Lazy B agrees that the amount of fees to be paid when due will be calculated and based upon the acreage fee schedule then in effect for District No. 7. 6. The obligation of Lazy B shall be secured by the ex~cution of a deed of trust or other similar instrument approved -2- "11-2" AGENDA ITEM #40 -DISTRICT 7 by District's General Counsel, in favor of District and to be recorded in the official records of Orange County, California. 7. In the event of the failure of Lazy B to pay the annexation fees when due, District shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs that may be incurred, with or without the filing of proceedings in a court of proper juris- diction, in the collection of the sums owing to District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the date first above written. ATTEST: "11-3" Secretary LAZY B GOLF COURSE, a partnership, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, -3- AGENDA ITEM #40 -DISTRICT 7 . ' ·' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 DISTRICT NO. 1 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 5 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 6 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 7 Directors.present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 8 Directors present: Directors absent: MINUTES OF TIIE REGULAR MEETING August 11, 1976 -7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ROLL CALL James Sharp (Chairman pro tern) and Vernon Evans Ralph Diedrich and Kerm Rima Henry Wedaa (Chairman), George Scott, Vernon Evans, Donald Fox, Donald Holt, Jr., Miriam Kaywood, Bob Perry, Don Smith, Donald Winn, Frances Wood, and Robin Young Ralph Clark Frances Wood (Chairman), Bernie Svalstad, Thomas Blackman, Sam Cooper, Charles Sylvia, Norman Culver, Vernon Evans, Henry Frese, Miriam Kaywood, Alice MacLain, Stanley Meyer, Ron Pattinson, Laurence Schmit, Robin Young, and Martha Weishaupt Richard Olson Don Mcinnis (Chairman), Thomas Riley, and Howard Rogers None Paul Ryckoff (Chairman pro tern) Kerm Rima and Ralph Diedrich Donald Saltarelli (Chairman), Pete Barrett, John Burton, Vernon Evans, and Don Smith Ralph Clark and Frances Glockner Thomas Riley (Chairman) and Harold Edwards Phyllis Sweeney 8/11/76 DISTRICT NO. 11 Directors present: Directors absent: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Laurence Schmit (Chairman), Ron Shenkman, and Harriett Wieder None Fred A. Harper, ·General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Secretary, Ray Lewis, William Clarke, Rita Brown, Hilary Eitzen, and Dennis Reid Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hohen~r, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Don Martinson, Joe Milkovich, Bill Knopf, and Peggy McElligott A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held at 7:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 11. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment of meeting by Secretary * * * * * * * * * * * This 11th day of August, 1976, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 6 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hall. DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded, and dµly carried: Excerpts re Board Appointment That the minute excerpts from the City of Laguna Beach and South Coast County Water District, be received and ordered filed; and the following repre- sentatives be seated as members of the Board: Entity City of Laguna Beach S~uth Coast County Water District DISTRICT 1 Approval of minutes Active Alternate Phyllis Sweeney Carl Johnson, Jr. Harold E. Edwards Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Appi'oval of minutes TI1at the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. -2- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held June 9, 1976, be approved as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approval of minutes That the minutes of the regular meeting held July 14, 1976, be approved as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Joint Chairman Winn reviewed a new procedure for Directors desiring addi- tional information on agenda items which he had announced in a memorandum enclosed with the agenda material. In addition to the staff being available to answer questions by telephone, the General Manager and Department Heads will be in the conference room adjoining the Board Room immediately preceding the joint meeting to answer Directors' questions or provide additional information on agenda items. The Joint Chairman recognized Director Maclain who report_ed on a recent meeting in Washington, D. C., with the Executive Director of the Asso- ciation of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies. Chairman Winn advised that there would be no Executive Committee meeting for the month of August. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General M_anager Treatment Plant No. 2. The General Manager reported that the Coastal Commission had issued a permit with regard to the installation and operation of the JPL-ACTS Facility at Mr. Harper briefly commented on the proposed budgets for 1976-77 which had been reviewed by the Executive Committee and which would be considered by the respective Districts later in the meeting. Budget recommendations will enable the Districts to meet their ongoing obligations tor improved treatment, yet allow tax reductions of as much as 3~ cents. -3- 8/11/76 The General Manager also reported briefly on the matter of treatment plant hydraulic capacity previously discussed with Directors. The State Water Resources Control Board and Environmental Protection Agency have indicated that, in conjunction with the 75 MGD Secondary Treatment Facilities presently under design, they will allow us to upgrade our primary capacity by setting new overflow ratings on our clarifiers which should resolve the hydraulic capacity problem for the near future. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that he had filed suit in accordance with the direction ·of the Board of Directors against the Southern California Gas Company for recovery of additional costs incurred by the District as a result of the Gas Company's improperly disclosed facility encountered in connection with construction of Knott Interceptor, Contract No. 3-18. He also reported that, pursuant to a meeting with the Districts' insurance broker, the procedures f9r processing claims filed against the Districts have been revised to insure that our interests are protected, and avoid difficulties experienced with the insurance carriers in the past. Mr. Woodruff also referred to the notice which had been mailed to Directors with regard to reorganization of his firm and briefly commented on the change. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Ratification of payment of Joint 0perating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund claims Fund Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Districts' claims on the following dates be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amounts so indicated: July 20, 1976 $164,407.76 14,212.44 $178,620.20 August 3, 1976 $108,429.61 539,201.45 $64 7' 631. 06 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "A-1" through "A-3" and "D-1" through "D-3", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following date be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amount so indicated: Fund July 20, 1976 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $1,114.90 in accordance with said claims listed on Page "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -4·- ·- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of ~ payment.of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amounts so indicated: Fund July 20, 1976 August 3, 1976 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $9 ,601. 00 . $919,138~61 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B" and "E", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following date be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amount so indicated: Fund August 3, · 1976 Accumulated Capital Outlay FJnd .$176,619.54 in accordance with said claims listed on Page "E", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried; Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following dates be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund July 20, 1976 $1,370.00 $1,370.00 August 3, 1976 $100 .. 00 $100.00 in accordance with said claims listed on Pages "B" and "E", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Ratification of payment of claims That payment of District claims on the following date be, and is hereby, rati- fied in the total amounts so indicated: Fund Operating Fund Facilities Revolving Fund -5- August 3, 1976 $ 1,322.75 73,121.26 $74,444.01 8/11/76 in accordance with said claims listed on Page "F", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-9-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Tre~tment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, granting a time extension of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company, be approved due to delays caused by having to coordinate the work with the Districts' operations. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Job No. Pl-16 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing an addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction Eompany, be approved for purchase of a spare pump impellar. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving plans and specifications for Job No. J-6-10 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on August 31, 1976. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving plans and specifications for Specification No. E-080 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-133, approving plans and specifications for Three (3) Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for an amount not to exceed $50,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving plans and specifications for Job No. I-4-lR Moved, seconded, and duly carried: TI1at the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-134, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities, Job No. I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on October 5, 1976. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- 8/11/76 DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Awarding contract for Automatic. ~ Gate Operators, Diversion That the Boards of Directors adopt Structure at Reclamation Plant Resolution No. 76-135, to receive and No. 1, Job No. PW-052 file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-052, to Instrumentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc., in the amount of $22,688.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Awarding purchase order contract for Purchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-024 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommenda- tion for P'urchase of 50% Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-024, be received and ordered filed; and that award of said purchase to Stauffer Chemical Company, for the price of $.10 per pound for a maximum amount not to exceed $75,000, be authorized. Moved, seconded, and duly carrieµ: DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Accepting Job No. P2-8-8 as complete That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-136, accepting Brook- hurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company at Plant No. 2 for transformer vaults Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-137, approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for installation of three underground transformer vaults behind the sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundaries of Plant No. 2, for no fee. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Authorizing Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members to attend WPCF and AMSA meetings; and author- izing reimbursement for expenses Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members be authorized to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 3-8, 1976; and that reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connection with attendance at said meetings, be authorized. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving waiver of quarterly administrative charge to District No. 8 1976-77, be approved. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: TI1at waiver of the $150.00 quarterly administrative charge to County Sani- tation District No. 8 for fiscal year -7- 8/11/76 DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Receive nnd file written report of the Executive Committee DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving Memorandum of Understanding with OCEA re proposed retirement system transfer Retirement System to Orange DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Declaring intent to approve transfer of Districts' retirement program from PERS to OCERS Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Committee, dated August 4, 1976,' be received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded,. and duly carried: That the Memorandum of Understanding with Orange County Employees Association relative to terms and conditions of proposed transfer from Public Employees County Employees Retirement System, be approved. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby declare their intent to approve a trans- fer of the Districts' retirement program from Public Employees Retirement System to the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in accordance with Section 20569 of the Government Code. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving amendment to LA/OMA Joint Powers Agreement re increase of scope of said study, and approving parti- cipation in ocean disposal studies Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-144, approving amend- ment to the Joint Powers Los Angeles/ Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional Wastewater. Solids Management Program agreement, to provide for an increase in the scope of the study and a grant augmentation therefor; and funding of the ineligible portion of the ocean disposal studies .and authorizing participation in said ocean disposal studies. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Policy re Executive Committee member attendance at State association meetings Following a discussion among the Directors with regard to the Executive Committee's recommendation re a policy with regard to Directors' attendance at State association meetings, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: Tiiat a policy be hereby established that each Executive Committee member, or.the member's designee, be authorized to attend State association work- shops and executive meetings on behalf of the Districts; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for fees and expenses in accordance with established Board policy be authorized and approved. Director Mclnnis requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record; and Director Svalstad requested that his absten- sion from voting on the item be made a matter of record. ~· .. -8- DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Report of the Building Committee 8/11/76 Director Culver, Chairman of the Building Committee, reported that his committee had met inunediately preceding the Joint Board Meeting to finalize preliminary plans for remodeling of the Administrative-Engineering building. Final plans will be submitted to the Boards in September. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Receive and file staff report re additional hydraulic treatment capacity DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Report of the Director of Finance on 1976-77 Budgets Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff report on additional hydraulic treatment capacity, dated August 5, 1976, be received and ordered filed. The Director of Finance reviewed the individual District's budgetary require- ments for the 1976-77 fiscal year. Based on funding requirements and tentative assessed valuations, tax rates in each of the Districts will decrease as much as 3~ cents. The average tax rates of the seven Districts has dropped 6 cents during the past five years. Mr. Sylvester reviewed the major factors which affect the financial outlook of the respective Districts and summarized the 1976-77 budgets as follows: Revenue Tax Revenue Federal & State Construction Grants Connection Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Interest & Other Income Carry-Over & Construction Reserves Total Funds Available Expenditures District Construction Programs Joint Works Construction Programs Debt Retirement & Interest Joint Operating Expense District Mtce., Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Amount $20.8 million 10.2 2.1 7.2 5.8 52.1 $98.2 million $48.5 million 34.4 3.7 5.0 6.6 $98.2 million It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: % of Budget 21.1% 10.3 2.2 7.3 6'.1 53.0 100.0% 49.3% 35.0 3.8 5.1 6.8 100.0% That the staff report on proposed fiscal year 1976-77 budgets, dated August 5, 1976, be received and ordered filed. -9- 8/11/76 DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Status report re operation and evalua tion pha s e of the JPL-ACTS process The Chief Engineer reviewed the status of the JPL-ACTS 1 MGD Facility which has been completed and undergone initial operational evaluation. It appears advisable to continue the operation and evaluation of the process through the current fis c al year to enable a complete feasibility determination. In this regard, the St a te Water Resources Control Board and Environmental Protection Agency have advised that they will approve a grant increase on the project from $3 .5 million to $4 .1 million. Following a brief discussion, the following actions were taken by the Boards of Directors . DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Receive and file staff Moved, seconded, and duly carried: report re JPL-ACTS process That the staff report on the operation and evaluation phase of the JPL-ACTS process, dated August 4, 1976, be received and ordered filed . DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Authorizing staff to proce e d ~ith facility modifications to the JPL-ACTS p rocess and continued opera tion and evalua tion, subj ect to SWRCB approval ~~~~~~~~~~ Control Board. DISTRIC TS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Approving revis e d Step 1 Facilities Pl an, EIS and Pilot Plant evalua tion budget, and authorizing transfer of funds for continued operation and evaluation and neces s ary modi fications to the JPL-ACTS process Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff be authorized to proceed with facility modifi cations to the JPL - ACTS process and c ontinued operation and evaluation of said process through June 30, 1977, subject to written approval of the State Water Resources Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the revised Step 1 Facilities Plan, Environmental Impact Statement and Pilot Plant evaluation budget in the amount of $4,170,000, be approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That tra nsfer of up to $489,000 to the Joint Oper a t i ng Fund from the Operating Fund Una ppropriated Reserves of t h e respective Districts, in accordance with their proportional participation in the Joint Operating budget, for continued operation and evaluation of sai d process, be authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED : That transfer of up to $125,000 to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund from the Accumulated Capital Outl a y Fund Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their Joint Works equity percentage participation in the CORF bud get, for necessary modifica - tions to the JPL -ACTS process, be authorized. -10- DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Authorizing General Manager to employ Part-time Techni- cians re JPL-ACTS process 8/11/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be authorized to employ Part-time Technicians as provided in Resolution No. 75-138, as amended by Resolution No. 76-24, through June 30, 1977, in connec- tion with continued operation of the JPL-ACTS process. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Authorizing amendment to the NASA contract re JPL-ACTS process for required services re continued operation and evaluation of said process Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-145; authorizing amendment to the contract with National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,7 & 11 Authorizing amendment to the· John Carollo Engineers contract for required services re continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-146, authorizing amendment to the contract with John Carollo Engineers for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded,· and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal year budgets be and they are hereby approved-and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT 1 Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $1,010,175 173.,276 6,890,420 $8,073,871 FUR111ER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment 111at this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:22 p.m., August 11, 1976. -11- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 2 Authorizing filing grant applic~ition re Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon area Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-138-2, authorizing filing grant application re feasibility study for sewering Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon drainage area. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 15 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-139-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 26.382 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa Drive and Loma Street (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to County Sanitation District No. 2). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-14-3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reaches 2, 3 & 4, Contract No. 2-14-3, authoriz- ing an addi~ion of $25,080.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., be approved for District and City of Anaheim inter-trunk connections, $7,425.00 to be reimbursed by the City for their share of said costs. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-16-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, authorizing an addition of $7,086.98 to the contract with Vida Artukovith & Sons, Inc., be approved for additional requirements of Cal Trans for freeway crossing, and alignment modifications due to underground utilities. DISTRICT 2 Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal year budgets be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT 2 Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1958 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL AMOUNT or 1976-77 BUDGETS $ 2,989,499 109, 775 785,750 27,356,329 3,666,728 $34,908,081 FURTHER ~IOVED: Tlwt said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed. -12- DISTRICT 2 Adjournment 8/11/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Th.at this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned. DISTRICT S Approving Addendum No. One to First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agree- ment Creating NIWA Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Th.at the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-141-5, approving Addendum No. One to revised First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agree- ment Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management .Planning Agency (NIWA) authorizing inclusion.of the City of Santa Ana as an additional member agency. Certified copy of this resolution ·is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT S Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal year budgets be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT S Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $ 803,199 52,685 4,030,977 450, 111 $5,336,972 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment . That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hal 1. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m., August 11, 1976. DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year Operating Fund budget Th.at the District's 1976-77 Operating Fund budget in the total amount of $833.00, be and is hereby approved and adopted. FURTHER MOVED: That said budget is hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 8 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m., August 11, 1976. -13- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approvjng Change Order No. 1 to the plans and spcci fications That Change Order No. 1 to the plans ~ for Contract No. 11-lR-1 and specifications for Manhole Replace- ment and Repair, Newland-Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-1, authorizing a deduction of $1,140.00 from the contract with Rewes-Schock, J.V., be approved due to a reduction of Fiberglass lining thickness. Copy of this chang6 order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal year budgets be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT 11 Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1958 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 929,092 30,350 126,001 6,452,163 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $7,537,606 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Adjournment That this ·meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., September 8, 1976. The Chairman then declared the meeqng so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., August 11, 1976. DISTRICT 3 Authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Federal-~logul, Arrowhead Products re Contract No. 3-21-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-140-3, authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Federal-Mogul, Arrowhead Products in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, and authorizing payment of $2, 501. 00 for said easement. Certified· copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal year budgets be and they arc hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: -14- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 3 Operating Fund Bond & Interest Funds -1951 & 1958 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund $ 3,412,199 1, 248, 715 19,358,201 3,449,768 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $27,468,883 FURTI1ER MOVED: That said budgets are hereqy received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-21-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 .and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, authorizing an addition of $14,189.17 to the contract with B & P Construction Company, be approved for extra work incurred as a result of incorrect delineation of water main by Southern California Water Company. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Authorizing and directing the General Counsel to proceed with necessary action against Southern California Water Company re Contract No. 3-21-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Counsel be authorized and directed to proceed with necessary action against Southern California Water Company to recover extra costs incurred by the District in connection with construction of Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-2, due to the incorrect delineation by the Water Company of 10-inch.water line. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the· Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., August 11, 1976. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from John D. O'Donnell and Partners, re local sewer service Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-142-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from John D. O'Donnell and Partners, for a permanent easement for local sewer service southerly of Alton Avenue and easterly of Red Hill Avenue in the Irvine Industrial Complex area, at no cost to the District. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -15- DISTRICT 7 Authorizing acceptance of Temporary an<l Permanent Underground Easement from Nellie M. Reeve re Contract No. 7-6-9 8/11/76 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-143-7, authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Nellie M. Reeve in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, and authorizing payment in the amount of $3,250.00 for permanent easement and $2,250.00 for temporary easement. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive, file staff request Lyttle, Lemon annexation of the District and refer to from John B. Heights, for territory to Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the request from John B. Lyttle, Lemon Heights, for annexation of 7.849 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ranch Hill and Las Luces in the Lemon Heights area, be received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation. DISTRICT 7 Receive, file and refer to staff request from Bark K. Baker for annexation of territory to the District Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the request from Bart K. Baker for annexation of 13.24 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity north- west of Peters Canyon Road, adjacent to Sirrine, Mira Vista and Overhill Drives, be received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation. DISTRICT 7 Approval of 1976-77 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1976-77 fiscal year budgets be and they are hereby approved and adopted in th~ following total amounts: DISTRICT 7 Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1962 Bond and Interest Fund -1970 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Construction Fund Fixed Obligation Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1976-77 BUDGETS $ 970,634 32,633 292,644 805,952 6,342,208 369' 210 15,100 3,353,260 $12,181,641 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed. -16- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 7 Hearing on Engineer's This being the time and place heretofore established for the hearing on the Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement District relative to proposed Annexation No. 51 -Orange Park Acres Annexation, the Chairman declared the hearing open at ·s:30 p.m. Report for proposed Orange Park Acres Improvement District re Annexation No. 51 Following a brief report by the General Counsel and a review of the Engineer's Report for the Orange Park Acres Improvement District by the Chief Engineer, the Board entered into a lengthy discussion relative to proposed Annexation No. 51 -Orange Park Acres.Annexation, and the Improve- ment District associated therewith. It was clarified that the proposed improvement district general obligation bond issue would basically finance the annexation fees and Reaches 17 & 18 of the Tustin-Orange Master Plan Trunk Sewer, and reimbursement of advances by proponents of the cost of proceedings which have been provided on a pay- as-you-go basis to date. The local facilities required to serve properties· unable to connect directly to the trunk system would probably be provided by an assessment district or other means. The anticipated costs to be underwritten by the property owners were also reviewed by the Chief Engi- neer, and the processing costs deposited by the Orange Park Association were summarized. During the discussion Directors expressed concern over whether affected property owners had been apprised of all information and costs relative to the proposal. It was pointed out that a hearing would be necessary prior to actual formation of the improvement district and that the entire proceedings were subject to an election, but that approval of the Engineer's Report would be appropriate at this time. Originally the proponents had hoped to have the matter on the November ballot but now conceded that an election in March, 1977, appeared more realistic. It was the consensus of the Board that a meeting be held in the Orange Park Acres area to disseminate all information to the residents with regard to the proposal and to enable public feedback to the Board. Following further clarification of the alternatives presented in the Engineer's Report and the proponents decision as to which alternative to pursue, and the boundaries to be included in the annexation, Director Smith requested that previous statements of record by Directors repre- senting the City of Orange relative to the proposal be entered into the proceedings of this hearing as follows: From the Minutes of August 20, 1976: "The City of Orange has no objection to the conducting of a study concerning the establishment of sewers in that area comprising approximately 556 acres known as the Orange Park Acres area which study would involve no expense to the City of Orange. Neither does the City of Orange even oppose the construction of sewers in the subject area to serve the residents thereof to be paid for solely by the residents of Orange Park Acres provided the following concerns of the City are satisfied: -17- 1. The Orange Park Acres Association docs not request connection to any City-owned sewers in the subject area unless the property owner or owners requesting connection effect annexation to the City of Orange. 2. Subject to proper legal acquisition of necessary easements for such purposes, neither the property owners nor the Orange Park Acres Associa~ion will object to any future placement of City sewer lines through the subject area in order for the City of Orange to serve areas north, east, west and south of Orange Park Acres. 3. That property owners and the Orange Park Acres Association express their intention to provide sewer services only to the subject area surrounded by the City of Orange city limits on the west, north, and east and Chapman Avenue on the south, comprising approximately 556 acres and more particularly set forth on a map to be placed on file with the Sanitation District with a copy of said map to be supplied to the City of Orange. Because the intention of the Association is to serve the area known as Orange Park Acres comprising approximately 556 acres, the Association and resi- dents therein should conunit themselves, not only to refrain from attempting to annex new territory to this sewer assessment district, but should conunit themselves to assist the City of Orange in promoting annexation to the City of the area south of Chapman Avenue as well as all other areas within the sphere of influence. 4. Neither the Board of Supervisors, the Sanitation District, the Local Agency Formation Conunission nor any other public entity shall utilize the conduct 8/11/76 of the Orange Park Acres sewer study nor the pro- ceedings for the formation of any assessment district in the Orange Park Acres area comprising approximately 556 acres as a reason to delay or hinder future annexations by the City of Orange of territory within the approved area sphere of influence of that City. In summary, gentlemen, the City of Orange does not object to persons forming districts to serve their own needs for sewers. However, such legitimate desire of the residents of the Orange Park Acres area should never be used as an excuse to hinder or delay the annexation and development of land to the north, east, west and south of said area which is within the sphere of influence of the City of Orange as approved by the Local Agency Format:ion Commission. -18-· 8/11/76 Of course, we of the City of Orange are certain that the residents of Orange Park Acres have no such desire to impede the annexation of territory to the City of Orange and the future development of such territory in accordance with the Webb Plan which plan these very same Orange Park Acres residents participated in creating. Therefore, we assume that these Orange Park residents will have no hesitancy in affirming their intention to serve only the 556 acres involved in the present sewer study proposal." From the Minutes of March 10, 1976: "Annexation to Sanitation District #7 requires election (simple majority) and payment of annexation fees $828.00 per acre. General Obligation Bond Issue passage for payment of Annexation Fees only is not feasible. General Obligation Bond Issue as proposed in the amount of $1,140,000 requires. a 2/3 majority. Proposed Bond Issue does not provide any local sewers. The statement by the proponents of this Annexation and Bond Issue relative to "the District's policy of providing trunk sewers within one-quarter mile of all properties" is not a guaranteed right of all properties within the District. Annexation to Sanitation District #7 and passage of the proposed Bond Issue would impose a tax rate of $2.6954 per $100/A.V. but would not provide any local sewer system or physical connections to the trunk sewer system. Annexation with complete sewer system would cost approximately $2,292,000 and would result in a tax rate of approximately $4.40~/ 100 A.V. At the present time Orange County Sanitation District #7 has no vested rights in those portions of Reaches 17 and 18 constructed by the City of Orange. The proposed Improvement District is entirely within the official sphere of influence of the City of Orange as adopted by the Orange County L.A.F.C.O. The proposed annexation fee of $828.00 per acre will be inequitable to those that have paid the current annexation fee of $1,029.00 per acre, unless appropriate refunds are made. Status of Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer Trunk sewers are presently comp.leted to Fairhaven and the Flood Control Channel at Esplanade. (Reach 12) -19- 8/11/76 Design of Reaches 13 thru 16 of the trunk sewer from Fairhaven and Esplanade to Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista is now complete. The District Engineer will present the plans to the Board for approval 2/11/76 and ask for authorization to advertise for bids. This would accomplish the completion of the trunk system to meet the downstream end of the trunk sewer the City built in conjunc- tion with Klug Development by some time this fall. The City of Orange and the developers, Klug Development and Broad- moor Homes, Inc. have constructed two sections of the "Master Planned" trunk sewer. The first section extends from Santiago Canyon Road and Linda Vista to the intersection of Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. The second section extends from a point approximately 400' south of Meads Ave .. and Handy Creek, along Handy Creek to a point approximately 725' south of Amapolla. From the upstream end of the first section at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. to the down stream end of the second section, a local 12" sewer has been constructed to connect the two sections of master planned trunk sewer main. During the design period of the first section we considered building it along Handy Creek from Sanitago Canyon Road, south-eastward, however, the proposed align- ment traversed an extensive multiplicity of ownerships which would have required a considerable period of time just to acquire the necessary right of way. We, therefore, constructed it within existing road rights of way except at the southwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Orange Park Blvd. and ended it at Orange Park Blvd. and Frank St. The local 12" sewer main which we constructed from this point to the beginning of the second reach was also built primarily within existing road rights of way. The capacity of this 12" main is equal to approximately 40% of the trunk sewer. Tilis will allow a considerable portion of the contributary area up~tream of this section to be served before it becomes necessary to construct the parallel section of the trunk sewer. All of these sewer mains belong to the City of Orange. They were built by the City with sewer construction funds generated by the City, jointly by agreement with the Klug Development and Broadmoor Homes, Inc. The County of Orange has no financial investment or other rights in these facilities. We did construct certain portions of the mains to the design criteria of the adopted Master Plan of Sanitation District No. 7. This is intended at some future date to allow the city to "sell" these sections to District 7 at the City's option. The District has no vested rights in these sewers." There being no written comments received by the Secretary, nor further oral comments from the public, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this hearing on the Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improve- ment District be closed. Whereupon the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 9:13 p.m. -20- 8/11/76 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried Approving and adopting the by roll call vote: .....,, Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement That the Board of Directors adopt District re Annexation No. 51 Resolution No. 76-147-7, approving and adopting the Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement District as submitted without modification or change. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Ratifying conditions and approving agreement with Lazy B Golf Course, a Following a brief discussion re the proposed deferral of a portion of Annex- ation No. SS fees, it was moved, seconded and carried by roll call vote: Partnership, for deferring portion of annexation fees re Annexation No. SS That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 76-148-7, ratifying conditions and approving agreement with Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, for deferring payment of portion of annexation fees relative to Ridgeline/Lazy B Annexation -Annexation No. Director Smith stated that he was in opposition to granting a deferral of fees to a private firm and requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:17 p.m., August 11, 1976. -21- SS. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ~ 30344 30345 30346 30347 30348 30349 30350 30351 30352 30353 30354 30355 30356 30357 30358 30359 30360 30361 30362 30363 30364 30365 303~6 30367 30368 30369 3.0370 30371 30372 30373 30374 30375 30376 30377 30378 30379 30380 30381 30382 30383 30384 30385 30386 30387 30388 30389 30390 30391 30392 30393 ~ 30394 30395 30396 30397 Alex Fish Company, Lab Supplies All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearing Material Allensworth Company, Sight Dome American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals (MO 12-10-75) American Kleaner Mfg Co., Inc., Truck Parts City of Anaheim, Power V. B. Anderson, Truck Parts Banning Battery Company, Batteries Beckman Instruments, Controls W. C. Brooke, Employee Mileage C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair CS Company, Valves Cals Cameras, Photo Supplies R. L. Carson, Employee Mileage Civic Center Lock & Safe, Lock Repair Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance, Employee Bond Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County of Orange, Training Meeting County Wholesale Electric, Supplies Mr. Crane, Equipment Rental Crane Packing Company, Engine Repair Culligan Deioninzed Water Service, Lab Supplies Clarence Cummings, Employee Mileage Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. , Lab Supplies Daniels Tire Service, Tires C. R. Davis Supply Company, Hardware Diamond Core Drilling Company, Core Drill Filter Supply Company, Filters Fischer & Porter Company, Valves Foss Company, Lab Supplies Compressor Products Division of Garlock: Compressor Parts Garrett Industrial Supply Company, Cleaners General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal Graphic Controls, Chart Paper Griffith Company, Regrade Manhole Hasty Lawn & Garden, Hedge Trimmer Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Leased Vehicles Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tires Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts City of Huntington Beach, Plant #2 Water Hurley Electronics, Inc., Lamps Inland Nut & Bolt Company, Hardware International Business Machines, Maintenance Agreement Irvine Ranch Water Districts, Line Cleaning Water Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Plastic Sheeting LBWS, Inc., Safety Equipment, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Acetylene L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service "A-1" $ AMOUNT 53.00 262.76 23.17 22,625.07 90.59 147.27 8.80 240.73 646.20 16.65 695.00 386.25 74.22 5.40 4.00 6,162.00 · 101.18 160.86 6,194.20 241. 56 70.00 103.80 244.00 206.01 40.00 12.00 309.48 262.54 349.80 175.00 67.60 421.97 100.70 268.74 39.43 2,279.36 41.34 945.00 22.54 1,400.00 205.96 300.00 743.51 434.09 597.96 850.62 303.16 213.55 968.19 19.56 189.19 207.65 217.90 1~515.85 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30398 30399 30400 30401 30402 30403 30404 30405 30406 30407 30409 30410 30411 30412 30413 30414 30415· 30416 30417 30418 30419 30420 30421 30422 30423 30424 30425 30426 30427 30428 304.29 30430 30431 30432 30433 30434 30435 30436 30437 30438 30439 30440 30441 30442 30443 30444 30445 30446 Lawson Products, Inc., Hardware $ McCalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL Master Blueprint & Supply, Blueprints Morgan Equipment Company, Equipment Parts E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Multiquip, Inc., Equipment Parts National Chemsearch, Odor Control Chemicals City of Newport Beach, Water Orange County Water District, Basin Equity Replenishment Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Red Valve Company, Inc., Expansion Joint Dennis M. Reid, Employee Mileage Reynolds Aluminum Supply Company, Aluminum Routh Transportation, Oil Removal Santa Ana Electric Mo tors, Electric Motors Sargent Welch Scientific Company, Lab Supplies Seal Methods, Inc., Pump Packing Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tool?, JPL Vacuum Sherwin Williams Company, Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Sims Industrial Supply, Safety Glass Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern California Edison, Power Southern California Costal Water, 1976-77 Deposit Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp., Drinking Water Standard Concrete Material, Concrete State of California, Department of Transportation, State Pennit Inspection Surveyors Service Company, Office Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, Petty Cash Reimbursement Bruce J. Taylor, Employee Mileage Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings ·Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Steel Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline _ United Parcel Service, Delivery United Riggers and Erectors, Engine Unloading Unites States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Paul Vukich, Employee Mileage Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Western Wire & Alloys, Welding Materials Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Service, EDP Services Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Everett H. York, Engine Parts AMOUNT so.""' 36.25 524. 70" 40.81 9.50 1,100.28 68.02 246.98 9.81 386.76 303.48 180.13 23.70 1,083.97 956.09 381.85 106.93 80.38 428.24 94.82 43.38 25.14 395.00 5,371.07 86,600.00 186.56 92.08 33.06 32.05 233.64 41.46 1, 051. 60 1,450.81 82.20 14.32 666.63 279.84 132.96 . 34. 26 43.86 220.60 431.42 2,524.50 16.20 59.22 4,186.9~ 1,490.27 289.59 $ 164 ,407 ~ "A-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO • IN PAYOR OP ......_..,30341 Hasty Lawn & Garden, Groundskeeping Equipment 30342 Safety Service and Supply, JPL Filters 30343 Valve and Primer Corporation, Retention J-6-1 "A-3" AMOUNT $ 303.22 213.17 13,696.05 $ 14,212.44 $ 178,620.20 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID JULY 20, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCl.ThnJLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30336 City of Anaheim, Right-of-way Processing 2-14-4 30337 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3A, 2-14-4A DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30338 Estate of Frank Vessels, Jr., Right-of-way 3-21-2 30339 Henrietta Visbeek, Right-of-way 3-21-2 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30340 City of Newport Beach, Connection Fee Administration "B" $ AMOU~ 250. oo·- 864. 96 $ 1,114.90 $ 4,601.00 5,000.00 $ 9 ,601. 00 $ 1,370.00 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF .. 30490 30491 30492 30493 30494 30495 30496 30497 30498 30499 30500 30501 30502 30503 30504 30505 30506 30507 30508 30509 30510 30511 30512 30513 30514 30515 30516 30517 30518 30519 30520 30521 30522 30523 30524 30525 30526 30527 30528 30594 30529 30530 30531 30532 30533 30534 30535 30536 30537 30538 ..,,., . 30539 30540 30541 30542 A-1 Metal Services Corporation, Control Panel AAA-Fremont Bag & Salvage, Building Materials Advance Business Forms, Computer Paper Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings American Chemical Society, Periodical American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts, Gaskets American Society for Testing, Catalog The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Packing Associated Concrete Products, Grade Rings Charles M. Bailey Company, Inc., Valve Parts Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Rebuilt Magtronic Thomas G. Brisco, Employee Mileage Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Employee Exams C & R Reconditioning Company, Pump Repair Cals Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Castle Controls, Inc., Valves Coast Insurance Agency, Fire Insurance Premium Coast Nut & Bolt, Hardware College Lumber Company, Inc., Building Materials Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Electrical Supplies F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., Lab Supplies Diamond-Newport Ice Company, Sampling Supplies Eastman, Inc., Office Supplies Enterprise Printing, Printing Fischer & Porter Company, Regulator Parts Clifford A. Forkert, Right-of-way Mapping Edward R. Francis, Employee Expense Reimbursement, Pl-16 ·General Telephone Company HMK Marketeer Limited, Electric Cart Parts Hollywood Tire of Orange, Tubes House of Batteries, Batteries Howard Supply Company, Valve Parts & Repairs City of Huntington Beach, Water Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Keen-Kut Abrasive Company, Tools Keenan Pipe and Supply, Pipe King Bearing, Inc., Couplings, Bearings, V Belts Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial Supplies LBWS, Inc., Acetylene, Oxygen L & N Uniform Supply Company, Uniform Service Life Security Systems, First Aid Supplies Los Angeles Times, Subscription A. J. Lynch Company, Janitorial Supplies McCalla Bros. Pump & Drilling, Pump Parts McKesson Chemical Company, Activated Carbon, JPL Mobil Oil Corporation, Petroleum Products National Lumber Supply, Building Materials City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Specification Supplies "D-1 '' $ AMOUNT 309.52 275.63 207. 72 117. 00 128.88 12.00 708.55 7.09 232.47 101. 76 138.03 112 .16 17.70 26.00 485.00 89.64 80.56 7,500.00 200.49 325.82 1,238.50 140.14 310.13 51.90 13.46 31.80 528.61 104.52 1,282.01 1,757.80 138.23 220.40 87.62 52.83 370.44 516.30 10.11 121.48 46.64 143.58 319.31 479.20 382.94 335.16 593.16 515.39 49.00 109.07 63.07 5,239.16 74.76 18.79 5.27 227.42 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. 30543 Office Equipment Company, Calculator Repair 30544 Orange County Stamp Company, Rubber Stamp 30546 Oreo Block Company, Inc., Concrete Blocks 30547 Osterbauer Compressor Service, Compressor Parts 30548 Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies 30549 Pacific Industrial Supply, Tools 30550 Pacific Telephone 30551 M C Patten Corporation, Instrumentation 30552 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Actuary Service 30553 Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies 30554 Postmaster 30555 Quality Building Supply, Plastic Cement, Silica Sand 30556 RFL c/o Luscombe Engineering, Controls 30557 The Register, Bid Notice P-024 30558 The Republic Supply, Pipe Fittings 30559 Rewes-Schock, JV, Contractor 11-IR-1 30560 Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts 30561 Ryan Herco, Lab Supplies . 30562 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repairs 30563 Sargent Welch Scientific Company., Lab Supplies 30564 Scientific Products, Lab Supplies 30565 Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools 30566 Shepherd Machinery Company, Conveyor Repair 30567 Sherwin Williams Company, Paint and Paint Supplies 30568 Southern California Edison, Power 30569 South Orange Supply, PVC Pipe 30570 Southern California Gas Company, Natural Gas 30571 Southern California Water Company, Water 30572 Sparkletts Drinking Water Corporation, Drinking Water 30573 Speed E Auto Parts, Truck Parts 30574 Standard Oil Company of California, Gasoline 30575 Sun Electric Corporation, Fan Parts 30576 The Suppliers, Tools 30577 -Surveyors Service Company 30578 Tatkin Company, Regulator 30579 C.O. Thompson Petroleum Company, Kerosene 30580 Title Insurance & Trust Company, Title Report 7-6-9 30581 Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings 30582 Triangle Steel & Supply Company, Gauges 30583 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts 30584 J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Exhaust Fan Repair 30585 United Parcel Service, Delivery 30586 Unites States Elevator Corporation, Maintenance Agreement 30587 United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts 30588 Van Waters & Rogers, Caustic Soda 30589 Warren and Bailey Company, Inc., Pipe Fittings 30590 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts 30591 Western Salt Company, Salt 30592 Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Supplies 30593 Zellar's Cycle, Bicycle "D-2" AMOUNT $ 48.4~ $ 13.30 424.48 1,378.22 85.48 349. 79 ._ 496.04 354.68 700.00 324.82 500.00 779.43 76.11 20.00 774.03 8,416.58 336.73 58.97 233.05 134.79 401.85 415.73 2,794.78 580.64 51,594.42 9.81 2,471.32 3.74 20.99 232.45 7.48 31.64 413.05 114. 00 90.63 67.76 50.00 186.00 38.47 615.50 113. 08 8.07 33.00 3,107.41 2,033.24 116.17 155 • 74 'r 114. 88 185.71 262.90 ......,,,, 108,429.61 JOINT DISTRICTS.CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ..._, 30344A Beverly Pacific Corporation, Contractor PW-047 30345A Burling Instrument Company, Temporary Controls 30346A Calgon Corporation, Activated Carbon, JPL 30347A John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services, JPL 30348A County of Orange, Compaction Testing P2-8-8 ' 30349A Donovan Construction Company, Contractor Pl-16 30350A Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment 30351A Fleming Construction, Contractor P2-8-8 30352A General Electric Supply, Recording Meter 30353A J.B. Gilbert & Associates, Facilities Plan EIR 30354A Isco Company, Instrumentation 30355A Imperial Oil & Grease Company, Grease JPL Maintenance 30356A McCalla Brothers, Contractor PW-049 30357A Mine Safety Applicances Company, Safety Equipment 30358A NASA-Pasadena Office, Release Retention, JPL 30359A Pepsi Company Building Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent 30360A Ramsey Engineering Company, Field Service, Weighveyor JPL 3036IA The Register, Bid Notice PW-05.2 30362A Smith Emery, Pipe Testing Pl-16 30363A Truesdal, Scrubber Emissions Testing, JPL 30364A F.T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2 "D-3" AMOUNT $ 2,135.81 58.03 4,134.00 1,489.65 631. 96 446,260.20 340.85 701.18 916.90 21,124.84 1,774.14 212.96 3,784.14 195.89 48,019.40 254.40 805.13 98.97 13.00 1,750.00 4,500.00 $ 539,201.45 $ 647 ,631. 06 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCt.Jr.nJLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30452 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 30453 Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2 30454 Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Equipment Rental 2-14-3 & 2-14-5 30455 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5 30456 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 30457 Kasler Corporation & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4 30458 Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14-3 and 2-16-2 30459 Smith Emery Company, Pipe Testing 2-14-3, 2-14-4, 2-14-5 30460 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 · DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30461 B&P Construction, Contactor 3-21-2 30462 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2 & 3-21-1 30463 AG Tutor Co., Inc., & NM Saliba Company, Contractor 3-20-2 30464 Henrietta Visbeek, Right-of-Way 3-21-2 DlSTRICT:No~ 5 "ACCUMULATED CAPITAL.OUTLAY.FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30465 Archaeological Research, Inc., EIR Survey 5-20 "E" $ $ $ $ AMO~ 294,138.00 - 79,880.38 2,248. 75 .. 690.97 2,572.00 286,775.50 8,984.00 6,527.25 237,321.76 919,138.61 163,225.80 260.74 11,132.00 2, 001. 00 176,619.54 100.00 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID AUGUST 3, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS ~ARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 30466 Shelton & Associates, Right-of-Way Mapping .fl FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 30467 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-9 30468 Sully Miller Contracting.Company, Contractor 7-6-9 -· ._, . "F" $ AMOUNT 1,322.75 83.38 73,037.88 $ 73,121.26 $ 74 ,444 .. 01 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS JULY 3lt 1976 ENGINEERING DEPART1'1 E NT BLCWER ·! I ' I 8LJILDJIJ6-:--"1 __ ---- FINIS !-+ coNcerr£ w oR.J< SDUND 1tJsuLA- l1DN BFIJJG PJ-Ac£.r;or.J A1e MANJFN.D f4N£, 1-1 r:ADF/? p;P/lk: $LUJ:t;E Co J-LfCTJO/J I ...i-sTALJ..AlJ OtV C~NTl ~J\.{£.S JO I q 8 7 ' 5 4 ~ I I 2 I 4 3 6 5 8 7 10 9 12 II 14 13 1 E l0NDA R Y Cl.A RIF/EK$ 2 I D/6E~TERf }'U M? AtJD P1P1fJG Jtv STAU ..J>("T/ON CotJ 1'°JNIJ£S EXlfT/N6 ~UO>JOARY r-" Cl.ARI FIEIU l \ ..._) AERATION BASIN1 D P O W E K B U ll.f)JN'G 50 MG D ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT CONTRACT NO. P1 -16 .,,,. C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1 -t6 _SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27' 197 4 . ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $29, 876, 000. 00 PAID TO DATE: $26,497,896.67 Contract is for the construction of Activated SZudge secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. l. The new faci Uties UJi U aid the Distriats in meeting m:indated State and Federal ocean discharge requirements. When completed, the seconcJary treatment system flriZZ. process the 50 mgd of wastewater flowing through Pl.ant No. l. The effluent w·il,l, then blend CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977 ?Vith Plant No. 2 effluent at the outfaU booster station, improving the overall quaZity of water pumped through the outfall, system into the ocean. Significant structiues incZ.uded in the contract are the Blower Building, Aeration Bas-z:ns, Second- cary CZarifiers, two Digesters, flaste SZ.udge Thick- eners and the Power BuiZding. . ACTIVITIES. DUR ING THE PAST MONTH Work is continuing in all areas at a slow pace. In the Blower Building the engines are being grouted into place and are generally being readied for hookup with the gears and blowers. A member of the Districts Inspection team has been sent to Chicago, Ill. to inspect air diffuser piping for the Aeration Basins. This piping had previously been rejected for having,a poorly applied galvanized coating. Sludge flowm~ters have been installed in the Secondary Clarifier gallery area. Installation of the sludge collection system continues. Pumps and p:iping are being installed at the Waste Sludg~ Thickeners. Piping continues to be installed at the Digester. At ·the Power Building, the tar is being applied to the roof. \~\$ ,;i:-~,~~ ~.. "\!o ~ (J:. ~~~ ""~S) ~~~ TRINIDAD S =======T·~ Q\S\.2 TO BE coNSTF.UC'rED _ ....... - CONTRACT 2 -14-3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER ~ SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES Z, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Oct. 15, 1975 $3,814,462.00 $1,543,533.00 Cont1'0.ct calls for the construction of a 3.125 mite reinforced concrete pipe t-runk line sewer a- long La Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Imperial, HZJ'y. in Anaheim. The first one-third of tr..e project uses 51" diam- eter pipe, the baZ.ance is 48". AZ.So included in the contract is a Zatero.Z con- nector line to the Santa Ana River Interceptor system from 300' north of $anta Ana Canyon Rdo a- long Imperial, Huiy. to La Palma Ave. This 2 0 750' CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Nov .. 12, 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 calendar days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 section of 33" diameter vitrified clay pipe is designed to receive flows from the South River Trunk, serving Santa Ana Canyor.. f.lith the comple- tion of the S~uth River Trunk, the Santa Ana Can- yon pwnping station can be abandoned. This section of the interceptor system is desigr.ed to handle up to 35 milUon gaZ.Z.ons flow per day. Included in this figure is JO MGD allowance for accepting future high brine wastewater flO'..Js from San BePna.rCir.o and Riversid.e Coim.ties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Pipe laying is complete to Lake View Street. The contractor laid 1845 feet of pipe during July. Beginning August 2nd, the contractor will shut down operations on La Palma Avenue to allow clean-up and paving along the back end of the job. Base paving is in to Richfield Street: While this clean-up and p~ving operation is underway, excavation will begin for the 33-inch pipe from the corner of La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway, south across the Santa Ana River. This . portion of the, job (the Santa Ana River Crossing) is scheduled to be completed before October 15th and before returning to the main line La Palma Av~nue. - Dri~eway ac~ess to local businesses along La Palma Avenue has been .maintained continuously as construction progressed along the street. Traffic flow is slowed, but well controlled by flagmen during .working hours. Job is expected to be completed in late November. Low ~ ~\V6'q_ 4.~~\NU-'NG"~it\N~ ~~)...~,~~ DIST. 2 tt z COMPLETE ---... TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 2 -14 -4 .. PRIVATE RO. ~ CONTRACT 2 -14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 5 Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: October 15,1975 $4,240,957.00 $4' 254' 641. 50 Contract is for construction of a 5.1 mile long section of reinforced concrete pipe trunk line seiJer from Imperial-!fwy. along La Pal.Ina Aveo in J.naheim, traversing tr.e new Yorba Regional PaI'k to Weir Canyon Rd. The right-of-way then crosses the Santa Ana River at two places as it traverses county territory through Santa Ana Valley Irriga- tion Co. and Bryant Panch properties to Gypswn Rd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: January 7' 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 14 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: January 21, 1977 Depending on design criteria, various sections of this line use 42, 45 and 51 inch ciameter pipe. This section wiZ:Z. handle flows up to 32 miZZion gallons per dayo Ir.eluded in thfa figure is 30 MGD al Zowance for accepting future higr bPine wastewater flows from San BerrztlI'dino and Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Pipe laying under the upper river crossing is complete, and backfilli~g operations are.underway. Pipe has been laid under the second half of the· lower river crossing and forms are in place for pouring concrete encasement. One pipe joint remains to be installed at the start of the job in La Palma Avenue at Imperial Highway. This will be insialled during the second week of August. Contract should be completed this month, with possible re~om mendation for acceptance at ~he September Board Meeting. DIST. 2 ---- CONTRACT No. 2-14-5 -:I 0 t- o<{ COAL CANYON RD. GYPS UN\ CANYON RD. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. CONTRACT 2-i4-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER REACHES 6, 7 & 8 S. S. Zarubica,· Contractor STARTING DATE: Nov. 27, 19 7 5 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $2, 096, 676 .15 .. PAID TO DATE: $1, 110, 890. 85 ·Contract is for the construct-ion of a 2. 4 mile long section of reinforced ccr.crete pipe line B?W-" er. The line goes through the Santa fi.r.a Canyon from where Contra.ct No. 2-14-4 ends in a.bout the center of the Bryant Ranch property, along the :route of the Santa Ana River and through the northern portion of the Green River Golf Course to the County Line. The Zine terminates in a cor.troZ and metering structure designed to measure f'lor.iJs from the upper basin counties. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, '1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept• 21, 1976 The Zine consists of 45, 42, and 59-inch diameter sections of pipe. The diameters change in rela- tion to design requirerr.entS. This s€:ction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor system wiZZ handle flows of approxir.-ately 32 mill.ion gallons per day. Included in this figure is 30 /.:GD aUcwc:n.ce for accepting futuPe high brine ?JXzstewater floli.~s frcm San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH . · Work continues slow on this project, partly because of large quantities of ground water, making excavation dif- ficult. The Contractor laid. 2321 feet of pipe during July. Job is expected to be completed about the end. of Novemb.er· . ~1n_ '\G°S\I N~ \\J~N~\. NCCG!:~O..y ~t-~a.v ~(';)Vt"\ ~CT DIST. 2 ----• 'l'O BE CW:3'j'P.UCITD CONTRACT f\Jo. 2-16-2 7. N CONTRACT 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN~ FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976, $660,287,98 $642,517.66 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Contract is fori cor.struction of a 1. 4 miZ.e sewer foroe main of 30-inch ductile iron pipe. -This line wiZZ carry selJJage p'W'l':ped fricm the Yorba Linda Pimp Station at Yorba Linda Boulevard ar.d Associ- ated Road in Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana River Trunk line system at Palm Drive and Kzta.emer Bou.Zeva:rd in Placentia. PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Aug. 26, 19 76 This force TPain ar.d the pwr:p station are designed to relieve the presently congested Ncwhope-P~accn tia Trunk Line. lt wi iz serve proposed Zcmd use development of the tributary area 'to the year 2010. The f oree rriain is desigr.ed to accept up to 15 mil- lion gallons per day flows. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH ~. All pipe is in the ground on this job. Pressure testing for the portion under the freeway must be accomplished before grouting around the pipe in that section, then the line will be essentually complete. Base paving is in on all street surfaces and final paving operations will begin during August. The Contractor laid 1060 feet of pipe during July. Possible litigation on this project because of extra request by Contractor has been denied by staff. CITY OP ANAJ-/EIM AVE. N ROAD CITY t:JF ~ BUENA ~ ~ ~ ~ PARK ~ ~ ~ ~ CERRITOS AVE. CITY ~. DI ST .. 3 CYPRESS 5YRACUS£ --COMPLETE 'A TELL A AVE. , ... --TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 CONTRACT r·~o. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTlNG DATE: March 6, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3,876,870.00 PA I D T 0 DATE: $ 3 , 911 , 4 0 7 • 5 0 Contiuct is for installation of a Reinforced-Con- crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line from a point 1200 feet south of Kate lla Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 miles. Pipe diame- ters are 72" for the first 3, 900 feet, 63" for C, 900 feet and 66" for the remainir:.g 1200 feet of t-he project. nows from this reach will, drain in- to Contract 3-20-1 to the south. This project is a portion of the Knott Interceptor relief system designed to relieve the presently CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6' 1976 congested /.Ji Uer-Holder Trunk SeLJer by intercep- ting flows from the northwest portion of District 3. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street ar4 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. It UJilZ eventuaZZy extend to Irq;erial Avenue in La Habra. This portion of the relief system is designed to handle a flow of 68 million gaZZons per day and lJJiZl serve the proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Cleaning and TV checking of the 10" VCP sewer line replace during installation of the 66 11 line between Ball Road and Lincoln Avenue continues, to determine what portions must be replaced because of earth settling. All portions showing damage will be replaced beginning sometime in August. Final paving will be layed from Ball Road to Lincoln Avenue when these repairs are completed. CRESCENT II AVE. ~~~---'-~~~~~~. I I I I I LINCOLN I AVE. I I I ,_ ._. I w wl w UJ I C( I= I: t- U) ORANG£ U) 1! AVE. 1! ----------- -> z 0 ~ 0 l.J 0 c BALL ~ RD. ~ ...... •CARBON CREEK U~ANNEL .... ·.--,;· t·····--!'• -~~;."$.• ... _ •. '' •• :. . -· -· .. ~ /\1YRA AV£. ....:.. MARION G_ -~ I I I CERRITOS I ! ... COMPLETE EXERCISE I TRACK~,,.---,•.--~STABLE$ ~ 111 I ----.--... -o. P.R. R. 11 ttl 11 ll i ! 1111 1111 i i 111111 i 111111 i I i I I 11111111 I I ---l ARROW HE.AD : : MFG. CO. I I DIST. 3 ____ -:J KATELl ... A AVE. -11111--TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-21-2 CONTRACT 3-21-2 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29 B & P Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: ·April 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,177,745.00 PA I D T 0 DATE : $ 41 7 , 18 9 . 0 0 Contmct is for construction of a 2. 75 mile sec- tion of vitrified clay pipe trunk line sewer through the City of Cijpi>ess from Y.ateila Avenue in Los A la.mi tos to Crescent Avenue in W. Palma. De- pending on design critieria, the pipe line is in various sizes from 15" to 30" in diameter. This section of line will complete the nr:ister- planned T1estside Relief Interceptor sewer that be- gins at the Seal. Beach Blvd. Pwrrping Station at CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24, 1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED co"MPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' 1976 Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. This system is designed to rel.ieve the Los Alc.mitos Suhti>unk, which at present functior.s as the nnin sewer for the wes tside baoin. For the most pa:i.1 t, this Une is cur>rentZy flow-ing at or near peak capacity. This sectfon is designed to har.dle floos up to 6.32 million galZ.ons per day and will ser-ve pro- posed land use plans in the tributary to the year 2010. . ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work.continues very well on this project. The Contractor laid·2488 feet of pipe during July, and is at the turning point from Denni Street on to Orange Avenue. Backfill~ng and base paving follows trenching operations very closely .. Job is expec~ed t~ be completed by the end of the year. ~eCA-ss <lL~~h:------------------1 \~ 'oil ~~"' e't~ 0.C..'<o~ ~i"G"Vh (p~~~"'1 DIST. 7 ----- CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 BOND WALNUT SPR\N G t- CJ) (/) w $ w AVE. AVE. -ST. CHAPMAN :r AVE. II -a ~ -.J a:J 0 \.!> l-z <t (f) o.C.F.C.D. -------------- CONTRACT 7-6-9 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16 Sully-Niller Contracting Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: April 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $295,826.40 PAID TO DATE: $288, 429. 40 This contract is th.e last reach of ·the Trr:lster- planned Tustin-Oro.nge Trunk Sewer to be constmc- ted by the Dis tric:t. It consists of a 1. 5 mile section of vitrified clay pipe line varying from · 18 to 21 inches in diameter. Construction wiz:l begin at Santiago B~ulevard and Spring Street in Orange and go north to Santiago Canyon Road, where the project ends. 11ze line traverses portions of the City of Grange and un- incorpomted County area along its route. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 29, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 29, 1976 This portion of the trunk sewer lViH connect into an existing 18" sewer line naJ OtJned by the Ci t'J of Orange. The upstr·eam system feeding to this point is scheduled to be pv.rchased by the District at a later date. Designed flow for this portion of the trunk tine system is 4.65 MGD, and will serve the _proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the year· 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH All pipe is in the ground on this job, and has been tested and accepted. The Contractor laid 2158 feet of pipe during .July . • Final paving·and ~onstruction of a road bed across th~ Reeve property at Hewes Street and Villa Park Road remains to comple-te this project. Recommendation for acceptan~e expected at September Board meeting. • r SUMMARY TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During July Total Work Out to Bid DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During July Total Work Awaiting Award TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT, AWAITING AWARD AND OUT TO BID $31,243,463 27,3e9,936 455,245 27,000 $17,399,115 11,560,061 1,074,047 184,754 $31,2~3,463 27,000 $17,399,115 184,754 . $48,854,332 - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976 • 77 FISCAL YEAR - .,, - August 5, 1976 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Boards of Directors FROM: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (71") 962-2411 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Individual Districts' Budget Recommendations for 1976-77 Fiscal Year Enclosed herewith are the 1976-77 Budget recommendations for the seven Districts. The material has been reviewed by the Executive Committee which· recommends consideration of adoption by the respective Boards at the August 11th meeting. SUMMARY Although tax rate increases were originally anticipated this year in order to provide funding necessary to comply with mandated federal and state programs, the enclosed 1976-77 budget recommendations will enable the respective Districts to maintain their current fiscal integrity, yet reduce tax rates by as much as H cents. TAX RATES REDUCED Based on budget recommendations, the tax rates of the several Districts will drop as much as three and one-half cents. This will enable the respective Districts to maintain their current fiscal integrity, providing for adequate reserves in the event grant funds are not received in accordance with expectations, and accelerated construction of secondary treatment facilities if necessary, pending definitive action by the State Water Resources Control Board, the Environmental Protection Agency and Congress that will allow a more comfortable determination of long term funding requirements. The recommended tax rates have also been equalized as much as practicable to accommodate future revenue plan implementation discussed below. Comments on the impact of federal and state mandates and future projections are also more specifically addressed below. TAX RATE SUMMARY 1976-77 Maximum Actual Estimated Tax Rate Tax Rate Allow-Tax Rate Tax Rate Reduction District able ~er SB 90 1975-76 1976-77 1976-77 1 $.3781 $.3639 $.3484 $.0155 $ 58,000. 2 .4034 .3793 .3479 .0314 505,000. 3 .4460 .4537 • 4231 • 0306 . 594,000. 5 .2564 .2583 .2564 .0019 9,000 . 6 • 2240 .2261 .2239 .0022 7,000 . 7 • 4265 .3851 .3485 • 0366 214,000 . 11 .3767 .3539 .3485 .0054 23,000. Est'd. 1976-77 Tax Rate Reduction $1,410,000. IMPACT OF FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES Capital and Operating Costs. Directors will recall that in June, during consid- eration of the joint works budgets, it was anticipated that a tax rate increase might be necessary in several Districts in order to meet construction funding requirements to compiy with advanced treatment provisions of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and regulations promulgated pursuant to said Act by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State (SWRCB) and Regional (RWQCB) Water Quality Control Boards. The plant expansion program for improved treatment facilities to comply with federal and state mandates, and additional facilities to keep pace with increasing hydraulic demands placed upon our system will require an expenditure of $229 mil lion over a seven-year period. Although the capital costs are partially funded by federal and state construction grants, the major long-term impact is on operating costs. Upon implementation of full secondary treatment as presently required by the Act, treatment and disposal costs will more than double. The increased operating costs must be paid entirely by the local community as EPA and SWRCB will not share in these costs. To illus- trate the impact, treatment and disposal costs for 1976-77 amount to $5.4 million, or 5% of the total budget; whereas, in 1981-82 we estimate that full secondary treatment will increase costs to approximately $24.4 million, or 26% of the budget. Directors are cautioned in this regard that, with the exception of two Districts, the current tax rates will not fund operating requirements by 1980-81, and operating costs in six of the seven Districts will exceed the tax levy in 1981-82. Therefor, additional sources of revenue will be required in the future or tax rates may yet have to be raised. Revenue Program/User Charges. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (PL 92-500) requires implementation of a revenue program to distribute sewerage agency costs equitably among users. Two years ago, pursuant to efforts of our Directors and staff and other members of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA), the Environmental Protection Agency ruled that ad valorem taxes were acceptable in meeting the provisions of the Act, provided that it is demonstrated an equitable distribution of costs to classes of users could be achieved. Our approach to the revenue program has been based on this fundamental precept and the Districts developed such a program which received conceptual approval and was used as a model by the State Water Resources Control Board. Our program basically provides for distribution of costs to domestic users by ad valorem tax and allocation of costs to industrial and commercial users through a combination of user surcharges (implemented July 1st under the industrial waste/source control ordinance) and ad valorem taxes. This is the most cost-effective method and provides for a reason- ably equitable distribution of costs to users in compliance with the intent of the Act. Subsequently, however, Congress' General Accounting Office (GAO) ruled that ad· valorem taxes are unacceptable for operating, maintenance and capital replacement costs. This creates a tremendous problem for sewerage agencies throughout the country, especially the larger ones, in that collection of "user charges" through a direct billing system would add substantially to overhead costs (estimated as much as 25%), not to mention the associated administrative problems, and of course, would not improve the quality of waste treatment at all; the end result being higher costs to all users. -2- .. - .. ... ... ... .. - Our Directors, the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and the State Water Resources Control Board have been working vigorously in Washington to have ~ Congress amend the law to allow ad valorem taxes to fund operating and maintenance costs. To this end, the House recently passed HR 9560 by an overwhelming majority which, among other things, would amend the law relative to the secondary treatment matter and the issue of ad valorem taxes. The companion Senate bill, however, does not provide for this relief and it remains for the respective bodies to work out the differences. EPA recognizes that implementation of a "user charge" system as now required by the Act is neither cost-effective nor realistic and is, therefor, supporting the legislative change. But until such time as statutory relief is forth- coming, the impact on our Districts' fiscal planning remains somewhat in doubt. Pending the outcome of HR 9560, the staff will be submitting a revised revenue program to the Boards in the coming months that will enable compliance with the law and finalization of long-range funding of operating and maintenance costs. Until such time, it is deemed prudent for the Boards to continue their current fiscal policies that have enabled our Districts to be one of the few agency's in the state to finance the construction of advanced treatment facilities required by PL 92-500 without resorting to bonds, and yet maintain stable or reducing tax rates. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS & FUTURE PROJECTIONS Included with the preliminary budget recommendations are five-year cash flow forecasts which project income and expenditures of the several Districts through 1980-81. The financial outlook for each of the Districts has improved considerably during the past few years. As noted elsewhere, the enclosed budgets provide adequate funding and reserves pending further determinations by Congress and the regulatory bodies with regard to secondary treatment and user charges that will enable finalization of long-range fiscal recommendations. District No. 3 appears to have weathered their financial crisis because of imple- mentation of connection fees, commented on below, and the delay of construction schedules, and should emerge into a more stable outlook upon completion of their trunk sewer construction program. Districts Nos. 5 and 6 presently have the lowest tcx rates of the several Distrrcts which will begin to pose severe financial problems in coming years. This can be attributed to several factors. The substantial impact of inflation dis- cussed with the Boards when the Joint Operating Budgets were considered plus the threefold increase of treatment costs that will be experienced when secondary facilities are placed into service will substantially increase their share of joint operating costs. Further, District No. 5 must pump 100% of its flow to the treatment site, and District No. 6 approximately 25%, thereby significantly increasi-ng their in-district operating expenses disproportionately to other Districts where wastewater for the most part flows by gravity to the treatment plants. Also, District No. 5 has experienced higher than average flow and assessed valuation increases for the past several years which raises the amount of treatment plant equity they must purchase pursuant to the terms of the joint ownership agreement. District 5 Directors are also aware that connection fee collections have dropped off from $250,000 a few years ago to le~s than $29,000 in 1974-75. We did, however, experience an increase to $101 ,000 in 1975-76. _,,, Cash flow projections reflect estimates from the Irvine Company for the next five years. Through a long-term reimbu~sement agreement, the Irvine Company will provide funds for construction of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) which have been incorporated into the budget documents. -3- However, as discussed above, in the final analysis, the enclosed projections will depend on economic trends, and, as stated, final determinations yet to be made by the Environmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board and Congress regarding treatment and discharge requirements and funding flexibility. Dramatic cost increases are being experienced for construction of sewage treatment facilities, not to mention the impact on operating costs. From March, 1974 to March, 1975 the treatment plant construction cost index for the Los Angeles metropolitan area increased over 18%. Our construction cash require- ment projections provide an escalation factor. The rate of increase has tailed off considerably in the past year, but if it resumes they may have to be materially revised. As discussed in the Joint Operating budget message in May, if it becomes necessary to implement secondary treatment for the combined Districts' total flow, it is anticipated maintenance and operational costs wil 1 almost triple, based on current costs. This will, of course, reflect in the individual Districts' future budge~ary requirements. There is no scientific evidence to support the secondary treatment requirement for deep water ocean dischargers and our Directors and staff have been working with congressional representatives and EPA officials in an attempt to obtain a change in the definition of secondary 'treatment to provide a fiscally responsible definition which is consistent with environmental goals. In the event the definition is changed, it is anticipated that the outlay for treatment plant expansion will be reduced by $92 million. Further, in the event the pilot JPL-ACTS process on new technology being constructed under a $3.5 million grant proves successful, the capital costs would be susbtantially reduced also. There are several significant contributing factors for the improved financial outlook of several of the Districts. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES DELAYED. Because of unanticipated delays-- primarily, processing and approval of projects by state and federal · construction grant authorities--trunk sewer construction schedules originally projected by Districts' engineers have slipped one to two years. Construction of advanced treatment facilities ~t the Districts' plant sites, pursuant to requirements of the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments, were originally mandated to be constructed by 1977. Regulatory agencies now realize that this construction schedule is not realistic and, therefore, our Master Plan for plant construction anticipates a scheduled completion in 1983 of additional advanced treatment works at an estimated capital cost of $205 million to comply with the secondary treatment require- ments as now interpreted by the Environmental Protection Agency. This, of course, allows the Districts to spread their cash flow over a longer period of time and provides additional time for accumulation of necessary construction funds. However, notwithstanding the above, there appears a new effort by SWRCB and EPA to possibly expedite this construction. CONNECTION CHARGES. Districts Nos. 2 and 3, because of their exten- sive trunk sewer expansion programs, were experiencing the most severe financial strain four years ago. These two Districts adopted connection charges which became effective October 1, 1973. Even though each District's connection fee income appears to be running less than originally estimated by the financial consultant, because of this action by the respective Boards of Directors, District No. 2, as noted above, reduced its tax rate the last two years and -4- .. 11111 .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 11111 .. - - - District No. 3's fiscal outlook has improved to the point where it appears as if it will not be necessary to consider a bond issue and, in fact, can reduce its tax rate this year. District No. 7, which adopted connection charges several years ago, has improved its fiscal position to the point where they have been able to reduce their tax rate by more than 12¢ the past three years. District No. S's connec- tion charge program has also been able to fund an extensive facilities expansion program. However, as noted above, District S's income has substantially dropped. INTEREST ON INVESTMENT OF ACCUMULATED CONSTRUCTION RESERVES. During the past four years the yield on investment of accumulated construction reserve funds has increased from approximately 3-1/2% to between 10 and 12%, but has now dropped to around 5-7%. These interest earnings become available to meet funding requirements. If the yields are maintained for any period of time, individual Districts will recognize substantial earnings which may be used for their construction programs. Additionally, as mentioned above, our construction schedules have slipped somewhat, enabling us to invest accumulated reserves over a longer period of time until the cash is required. This has the com- pounding effect of increasing earnings and available funds. ASSESSED VALUATION INCREASES. As indicated on the following schedule, assessed valuations have averaged 11.7% last year and 19.4% increase this year which materially increases the respective Districts' tax base and, therefore, their funding ability. District No. 2 3 5 6 7 11 $ ASSESSED VALUATIONS Actual Estimated 1975-76 1976-77 346,254,440 $ 397,868,870 1,442,579,777 1,693,509,087 1,709,545,870 2,052,079,825 407,590,720 506,326,490 291,089,650 349 '533' 170 539,334,150 650,094,950 359,567,435 436,731,770 -5- % of Increase 14.9% 17.4 20.0 24.2 20. 1 20.5 21. 5 BUDGET ITEMS There are five major expenditure components of the individual Districts' budgets, four of which have either previously been acted upon or reviewed by the Boards, or established by outstanding general obligation bonds. DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS. Requirements for this item are essentially established by the individual Districts' adopted Master Plan of trunk sewers. JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. Adoption of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budget by the Joint Boards at their regular June meet- ing established the requirements for this budgetary item, subject to change at the Boards' discretion. The Master Plan for Treatment Plant Expansion, as discussed above, is designed to meet the second- ary treatment requirements of the 1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act as presently interpreted by the Environmental Protection Agency. The cash flows have been adjusted to reflect accelerated construction of additional primary facilities at Plant No. 2 still under consideration by the State and EPA. Individual Districts' share is based upon their ·respective equity percentage which is computed on assessed valuation and flow. DEBT RETIREMENT AND INTEREST. These requirements are fixed by the indentures of the respective general obligation bond issues. CAPITAL COST RECOVERY REFUNDS. One of the requirements of PL 92-500 is that 100% of the federal construction grant funds attributable to the industrial capacity of the grant funded projects must be recovered from industrial users and 50% returned to the federal treasury. With- out going into extensive debate on the issue, suffice to say at this point that (1) the validity of the provision is somewhat questionable, and (2) it presents monumental accounting problems. In any event, this amount will increase substantially as grant funded projects are completed and placed into service. JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES. Requirements for this item were established by adoption of the Joint Operating budget at the June meeting. Indi- vidual Districts share this cost based upon their proportionate gallonage flow. DISTRICT MAINTENANCE, OPERATING & OTHER EXPENDITURES. This item establishes requirements for maintenance and operation of the individual Districts' sewer collection systems and provides for the conduct of each District's general business. It also includes purchase and sale of treatment plant equity among the Districts in compliance with the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, and any other miscellaneous items. The total budgetary requirements for all Districts combined is $98.2 million for 1976-77. Of this total approximately 84% is for capital expansio~ of Districts' trunk sewers and their respective share of Joint Works expansion costs and reserves. Below is a summary of the combined 1976-77 budgeted revenue and expense recommendations for all Districts, and the projected five-year cash flow totals: -6- .. .. .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. - .._, - RECOMMENDED BUDGET FIVE-YEAR CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS REVENUE 1975-76 1976-77 % of Budget Amount % of Total Carry-Over & Construction Reserves $52.3 million $52.1 million 53.0% $ 52.1 million 14. 6% Tax Revenue 18.8 20.8 21. 1 111.0 31. 1 Federal & State Construction Grants 15.2 10.2 10.3 144. 8 40.6 Fees 1.5 2.1 2.2 11. 3 3.2 Sale of Capacity Rights 6.3 1.2 7.3 19.7 5.5 Interest & Other Income 4.8 ~ 6. 1 _!L:1 ~ Total Funds Available $98.9 mi Ilion $98.2 million 100.0% $356.8 million 100.0% EXPENDITURES District Construction Programs $ 4 4. 5 mil 1 i on $48.5 million 49.3% $ 33.5 million 11. 2% Joint Works Construction Programs 36.7 34.4 35.0 190. 1 63.4 Debt Retirement & Interest 3.8 3.7 3.8 10.6 3.5 Joint Operating Expense 5.1 5.0 5. 1 50.5 16.8 Capital Cost Recovery Refunds 1.0 .3 District Htce., Operating & Other Expenditures 8.8 6.6 6.8 ~ 4.8 Total Expenditures $98.9 million $98.2 million 100.0% $300.0 million 100.0% It is quite evident from the summary above that the major portion of the Di~tricts' funding requirements for the next five years are for construction of new facilities to meet rising sewage flows and to upgrade the wastewater treatment processes. Following are comments regarding the several funds of each District's recommended budget: OPERATING FUNDS. The major item in the Operating Funds is the share of the Joint Operating budget which was adopted by the Boards in June. The remaining budget accounts are primarily for maintenance and/or repair of the ~i.stricts' collection syitem and for the incidental operating expenses which the Districts will incur. Al 1 of the Districts have been in the midst of major trunk sewer expansion programs for the past several years. As a result budgetary requirements for sewer line and pump station maintenance may reflect increases for maintenance of these facilities. As discussed at the time the Joint Operating budget was considered, unappropriated reserve accounts have been increased to provide adequate contingency reserves in the event it is necessary for the Districts to increase chemical treatment processes at the plant sites or extend the JPL-ACTS program, and to provide a reserve to buffer the impact of inflationary trends or unanticipated major equipment failures in which event said funds may become necessary. Following are further comments on the Operating Fund line item accounts: DIRECTORS FEES -Provides for regular meetings and allows for meetings in accordance with fee schedule recently adopted by respective Boards. -7- SHARE OF JOINT OPERATING -Represents District's Share of oper- ating, maintaining, and administering joint works treatment and disposal facilities and is allocated based on gallonage flow of each District. Amounts were established by adoption of the Joint Operating Budget in June. TRUNK MAINTENANCE -Provides for maintenance of Districts' collection system of trunk sewers. The several Districts presently have approximately 450 miles of sewers ranging in size from 8 inches to 96 inches. MANHOLE AND LINE REPAIRS Provides for major contractual repairs to Districts' manholes and trunk sewers which have deteriorated because of corrosion. PUMP STATION MAINTENANCE -Provides for maintenance of Districts' pump and lift stations. Districts which have collection systems that cannot flow to the treatment sites by gravity have one or more stations. Therefore, the costs among these Districts vary considerably based upon the number of pumping facilities. PERMIT AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE ADMINISTRATION -Provides for the Industrial Waste Division's administration of the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance. The recently adopted ordinance which incorporates requirements mandated by State and Federal regulatory agenci.es may increase this item substantially in the future. INTER-DISTRICT SEWER USE CHARGE -Provides for payment for inter- district flows between certain Districts pursuant to basic accommodation agreements of said Districts. BOND COLLECTION EXPENSE -Several of the Districts' .bond issues provide for coupon redemption by the Bank of America which charges the Districts for said services. TAX COLLECTION EXPENSE -The County charges a tax collection expense on all funds except bond interest and sinking funds. INVESTMENT ADMINISTRATION FEE -County Treasurer's processing fee for placing investments of Districts' funds. (Note: This fee applies in all other funds also.) TREASURER'S BANKING FEE -This charge will be implemented this year by the County Treasurer for services primarily in connec- tion with handling commingled investments. UTILITIES -Major item in this account is for power supplied to the Districts' pump stations. Also includes telemetering on leased lines to the control center at Plant No. 1, and water supply where needed at the pumping station sites. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -Appropriates funds for engineering, legal and special consulting services for which the need arises from time to time in the Districts. -8- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. ... .... ... ... PRINTING AND PUBLICATION -This account, which has been reduced in all Districts, provides necessary funds for publishing actions and regulations of the Boards. MEMBERSHIP -Provides for each District's share of membership fees in the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, allocated based upon assessed valuation. TRAVEL AND MEETING -DIRECTORS' MILEAGE -Provides for reim- bursement to Directors for transportation to Board meetings and other functions. BOND FUNDS. Budget requirements for the Bond funds, as pointed out above, are determined by the indenture.of each issue and are established each year in accordance with legal requirements. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS. The major item in the Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds is the individual District's respective share of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budget for joint treatment works expan- sion which was adopted by the Boards at the June meeting. Most of the Districts also have a Master Plan construction program in progress for which specific budget appropriations have been recommended for contracts presently underway or planned in the immediate future. Other line items in this fund are primarily for accumulated reserves for future construc- tion in accordance with the Districts' and joint works Master Plans, and purchase and sale of equity in jointly-owned treatment works as provided for in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. CONSTRUCTION FUND. District No. 7 has approximately $370,000 remaining from the $4.5 million 1970 Bond proceeds. Presently, there are $1.5 million in authorized but unsold bonds from the 1970 issue. It is recommended that these funds be retained in the Construction Fund until completion of the District No. 7 Master Plan program. FIXED OBLIGATION FUND. The District No. 7 Fixed Obligation Fund provides for the District's share of the purchase of Joint Outfall Sewer facilities. in 1951. This non-interest bearing obligation will be paid off in 1981. Other Districts have previously completed payment of their respective shares. FACILITIES REVOLVING FUNDS. Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 have Facilities Revolving Funds to account for connection fee revenues and capital expend- itures for improvements paid out of said fund. The net funds accumulated by Districts 5 and 7 include provisions for payments on reimbursement agreements entered into for construction of Master Plan sewers within the respective Districts. Connection charges in Districts Nos. 2 and 3 commenced October 1, 1973. The staff is recommending that District No . 11 consider implementing a connection charge sometime during the fiscal year to provide additional funding required for the master plan trunk sewer program presently under preparation. If Directors have any questions regarding the budget material, either myself or Fred Harper would be most pleased to discuss them at your convenience. -9- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ' -OF ORANGE COUNTY , - - - - BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY S,~~Jl~:'.!1 n~~----~_!STJ1l9T_ No. 1 BUDGET RECOr.1rl'tENDA'ilONS TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION 8: RESERVE 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR BUDGETED REQUIREME~JT DOLLAR. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 8,073 ,871 CARRY-OVER 8: RESERVE ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR TOTAL AVAILABLE $ S,073 ,?.71 TAX REVENUE DOLLAR a TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 1..,31h367 •Rounded to nearest . ·-· ~-.. -~-_, ..... p_...__ __ ~~· ---·----.. -..-............ ____ ·-.. -·------~·----·----·-·-•.. cent r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TR.END CHARTS 72/73 'THROUGH 76/77 700 650 Cl) c: <t 600 _, 41 -' 0 550 0 son ' 40 ta.. 0 39 450 (I) 38 z 400 Cl) 0 :J 350 -' :z: :c 36 300 LI.I u 35 250 34 200 33 72 73 74 75 76 . 32 73 74 75 76 77 F I S CAL YEAR 72 73 74 75 76 IOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION '73 74 75 76' 77 FISCAL YEAR IA6 BAI~ ' I I I I I I I I I I I NO. I 1 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 Cl) er 5.5 c:r :h.o 0 0 4.5 . LL o 4.a . ~ 3.5 .0 :j 3.0 -:a 2.5 2.0 1. 5 1.0 .5 72 73 BUDGETED REQUIREMEN!S CASH EXPENSE 73 74. 75 76 74 75 76 77 FISCAL YE AR TOTAL BUDGET 8 EXPE:~DtTURES I I I I ( l I - - - ... - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NO. 1 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 397,868,870 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 377,975,427 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .3484 SUMMARY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 37,797 APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1974176 1975/76 1976/77 REQUIREMENTS Operating Fund 874,083 1,050,816 1,010,175 Bond and Interest Fund -1951 178,001 175,638 173,276 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 5,954,019 6,422,638 6,890,420 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 7,006,103 7,649,092 8,073,871 FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Investments) 3,757,739 4,649,045 5,254,312 Other Revenue and Transfers 2,138,686 1,802,557 1,502,192 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,896,425 6,451,602 6,756,504 DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 1,109,678 1,197,490 1,317,367 TAX RATE Actual Actual ------ Operating Fund .1502 .1297 .0629 Bond and Interest Fund -1951 .0293 .0261 .0225 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund .1876 .2081 .2630 TOTAL TAX RATE .3671 .3639 .3484 I I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0._1_ FUND . #1 OPERATING DESCRIPTION.OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Permit & Ind. Waste Adm. Bond Collection Expense Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Treasurer's Banking Fee Professional Services Printing and Publication Memberships Travel & Meeting -Directors Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL OPERATING NON-OPERATING Expenses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL NON-OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AU11IORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & ·REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income & Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for authorized budget transfers BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 397,868,870 1976/77 EST. A. V. ADJUSTED FOR 5~;; DELI NQ. $ 377, 975, 427 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0629 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 37,797 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1c:p1,175 1975/76 "XPENDITURES 1 C:7C,-7f. 1976-77 4,200 4,500 3,350 4,500 . 489,083 590,566 400,635 552,675 20,000 20,000 13,445 20,000 21,000* 25,000 18,357 25,000 300 200 139 200 1,200 1,200 1,128 700 800 800 ; 400 1,000 l 500 1,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 3,000 266 1,000 350 400 ' I 299 400 . 150 150 ,, 77 200 < 500* . 426 1,000 ,, 539,083 648,316 438,522 609,175 : T 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 . 3,000 542,083 651,316 438,522 612,175 63,000* 74,500* 92,000 269,000 325,000 306,000 874,083 1,050,816 1,010,175 - ' . 1,050,816 438,522 612,294 85,237 367,594 551,889 697,531 3,200 7,600 4,600 23,000 33,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 423,794 622,489 772,131 450,289 428,327 238,044 .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY Sf\NITATION DISTRICT N0._1_ FUND #1 BOND & INTEREST -1951 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AU1110RIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH AND REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $980,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 397,868,870 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 377,975,427 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0225 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE ~Ill RAISE $ 37,797 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RE COMMEN OED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q74175 1975176 XPENDITURES l 0,7r;-7F. 1976-77 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 25,463 23,888 23,888 22,313 200 200 75 200 ,: 95,663 94,088 93,963 92,513 82,338 81,550 80,763 178,001 175,638 173,276 ' ti· Ii: t 175,638 93,963 81,675 !> :· 4,207 86,391 86,656 85,882 '". 900 1,500 : 900 2,000 1,300 1,300 . 89,291 89,456 88,082 88,710 86,182 85,194 . \ ;, ... ·' f. f'' ,·· ,,. 1' '· 1·0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~1~ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976177 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 397,868,870 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 377,975,427 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2630 FUND h ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 37,797 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES APPROVED BUDGET 1q7I+175 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 ESTIMATED ACTUAL ~XPENDITURES 1cnr-7f, Treatment Plant Expansion 3,205,419 2,475,738* 1,527,956 Reserve for Facilities to Comply with State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California 1,277,000 1,959,000 Raitt Street Trunk 975,000 1,600,000 Raitt Trunk Right-of-Way Acquisition District Facilities Improvements and Extension Reserve Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Tax Collection Expense & Other Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Joint Works Equity Sale Sale of Capacity Rights Fees Federal and State Grants Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH AND REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2 225,000 119, 000 150,000 1,000 1,600 385,000 1,000 1,900 I 107 575 1,791 5,954,019 6,422,638 1,530,429 1: 3,303,754 4,010,500 L t .~ " :,' ). 7,000 9,000 I 42,002 75,367 12,584 21,790 ~ ' ," 1,833,000 1,412,000 185,000 211,000 5,383,340 5,739,657 S70,679 682,981 6,422,638 1,530,429 4,892,209 421,310 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 2,029,820 3,156,000 1,200,000 500,000 1,000 2,600 1,000 6,890,420 4,470,899 7,000 220,392 21,000 37,000 940,000 200,000 5,896,291 994,129 .. - .. - - ... .. .. ... - - ... .. - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I ( . I 7/29/76 COUNIY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONTRUCTION PROJECTS Project Total 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 Raitt Street Trunk $1,200,000* $1,200,000 Miscellaneous 375,000 75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 TOTALS $1,575,000 $1,275,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 *Partially Funded by District No. 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 DESCRIPTION 76-77 77-78 78-79 79-80 . 80-81 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $ 5,254,000 $ 4, 199,000 $ 4,822,000 $ 4,236,000 $ 3,743,000 REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.3484) 1,317,000 1,367,000 1 ,419,000 1 ,473,000 1,528,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 940,000 2,081,000 3, 311 ,000 4,114,000 2,918,000 Fees 67,000 76,000 87,000 99,000 113,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 21,000 156,000 6,000 509,000 525,000 Miscellaneous 474,000 262,000 281 ,000 260,000 237,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 8,073,000 $ 8,141 ,000 $ 9,926,000 $10,691,000 $ 9,064,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 1,275,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Share of Joint Works Construction 1,878,000 2,243,000 4,394,ooo 5,458,000 3,608,000 Bond Retirement & Interest 92,000 91,000 89,000 88,000 86,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federa 1 Treasury 60,000 62,000 62,000 Share of Joint Operating 553,000 821 ,000 967,000 1, 143,000 2,059,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 76,000 89,000 105,000 122,000 141 ,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 3,874,ooo $ 3,319,000 $ 5,690,000 $ 6,948,000 $ 6,031 ,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 4, 199,000 $ 4,822,000 $ 4,236,000 $ 3,743,000 $3,033,000 Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 1 ,692,000 2,876,000 3,505,000 3,047,000 2 ,011 ,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 2,507,000 $ 1,946,000 $ 731 ,000 $ 696,000 $ 1,022,000 One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise $ 37,797 $ 39,687 $ 41 ,671 $ 43,755 $ 45,943 I ( I I I • I I I I t f I I • I I I .< • I - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR . . . - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY $A ~~JJ_o.:f ! OrL_Q IS TR I CT---~-~ n __ . __ 2_ B lJ 0 G ET R EC 0 M r, 1 E N D 1\ TI 0 NS 1976-77 FISCAL YE AR DI ST;~ I CT f"ACILITILS EXi'MJS ror1 ~·: RESEHV.:. ~.62 BUDGETED REQUrREt-_1ENT DOLL,~R & TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 34,'708,G31 ACCUIJlULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUiJD TAX REVENUE DOLLAR ~ TOTAL Mt.OUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ ;,5"?,on CARRY-OVER & RESERVE SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR ~ TOTAL AVAILABLE $ J<l.,';·•A~,0~1 •Rounded to nearest cent ·-. ~ "------.-~"--• ··-·· .............. --·------~·---·--------...... >--....--~---· ,,,.__,. .. _._ __ .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 TR.END CMAR7S BUDGETED 36 REQUIREMENTS 1700 72/73 ·THROUGH 76/77 34 1650 32 1600 1550 30 Cf) 1500 28 a: 26 51450 ..J 43 24 0140() 0 (/) 42 er 22 u.. 1350 < 0 41 ..J .J .20 1300 0 Cf) (/) 40 0 ~ 1250 18 ... 39 . LL ::J 0 16 = 1200 z CASH EXPENSE ~ "" 38 (/) 14 z 1150 .0 CJ 37 ..J 12 1100 ..J 36 :l: 10 1050 35 8 72 73 74 75 76 . 34 RAISED BY TAXES 73 74 75 76 77 6 F I S CAL YEAR 4 ASSESSED ·72 73 74 75 76 I, TOTAL VALUATION 73 74 75 76' n FIS CAL YEAR 72 73 7.1· 75 76 73 74 7;, 76 77 IAX BAit; FI S C A L YE AR ., TOTAL BUDGf T a EXPE7JDITURES ( I I I • f I ' I I I I f I • I I I ( I r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NQ,_2_ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1,693,509,087 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,608,833,633 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ SUMMARY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 160,883 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE REQUIREMENTS Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1958 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Investments) Other Revenue and Transfers TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES TAX RATE Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1958 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL TAX RATE APPROVED BUDGET 1974/76 2,291,887 112,813 837,350 24,746,290 1,188,767 29,177,107 15,089,216 9,264,793 24,354,009 4,823,098 Actual .0886 .0044 .0353 .2542 -0- .3825 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 2,739,673 111,295 810,050 27,827,944 2,144,824 33,633,786 15,682,066 12,750,508 28,432,574 5,201,212 Actual .0891 .0041 .0324 .2537 -0- .3793 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976177 2,989,499 109,775 785,750 27,356,329 3,666,728 34,908,081 17,089,303 12,219,681 29,308,984 5,599,097 .0633 .0033 .0269 .2544 -0- . 3479 The County is presently impounding taxes in connection with a dispute over the assessed valuation of oil properties. Taxes impounded as of June 30th amount to $27,374. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~2~ FUND #2 OPERATING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Pump Station Maintenance Permit & Ind. Waste Adm. Inter~Dist. Sewer Use Chg. Bond Collection Expense Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Treasurer's Banking Fee Utilities Professional Services Printing and Publication Memberships Travel & Meeting -Directors Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL OPERA TING NON-OPERATING Expenses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL NON-OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AU1110RIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available .July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for authorized budget transfer BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 Fl SCAL YEAR Prelirn: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1,693,509,087 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,608,833,633 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0633 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE· $ 160,883 APPROVED BUDGET 1q7Ii175 10,000 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 12,000 ESTIMATED ACTUAL XPENDITURES 1C)7~-7f. 7,675 1,249,887 1,523,173 1,127,669 55,000 55,000 39,437 10,000 17,000 8,612 53,000* 50,000 48,525 2,000 1,000 3,000 800 3,700 10,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 2,000 800 3,200 I 800 r. 10,000 10,000 3,000 1,700 I 1,800 415 3,234 500 5,186 2,357 280 1,346 681 1,401,887 1,689,673 1,247,717 5,000 4,000 305 5,000 4,000 305 1,406,887 1,693,673 1,248,022 184,000* 200,000 701,000 846,000 2,291,887 2,739,673 1,043,484 1,362,130 10,000 14,000 24,000 35,000 107,000 107,000 1,184,484 1,518,130 1,107,403 1,221,543 2,739,673 1,248,022 1,491,651 307,233 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 12,000 1,601,999 60,000 20,000 65,000 2,000 700 2,600 1,200 1,300 18,000 20,000 1,500 1,700 1,500 1,000 1,8,10,499 3,000 3,000 1,813,499 270,000 906,000 2,989,499 1,798,884 21,000 41,000 110' 000 1,970,884 1,018,615 - - - - - - .. .. ... - .. - '-i. --- - - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - - COUNTY Sf\N IT{\ TI ON DI STR I CT NO I 2._L2A FUND #2 BOND & INTEREST -1951 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AUTIIORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $585,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIM~TED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1,694,988,897 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,610,239,453 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE rm $100 OF A. v. $ • 0033 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 161,023 APPl<OVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RE CO,.:MEN DED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1 q?'i/75 1975176 i-xrrnD I TURES 151.5-7f'.. 1976-77 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 15,244 14,232 14,232 13,219 200 200 50 200 60·,444 59,432 59,282 58,419 52,369 51,863 51.356 112,813 111,295 109.775 111, 295 ; 59,282 52,013 '. ·,. 2,565 ; 54,358 53,192 54,578 800 700 700 1,000 800 I. 700 56,158 54,692 55,978 56,655 56,603 53,797 ; .. ; ' COUNTY Sf\NITf\TION DISTRICT N0._2_ FUND #2 BOND & INTEREST -1958 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AUTI-IORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & RESERVE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $4,150,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIM/\TED ASSESSCD VALUATION $ 1,693,509,087 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,608,833,633 1976177 EST. TAX RATE rm $100 OF A. v. $ • 0269 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 160,883 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q71,17r; 1975/76 XPEND I TURES 1C';7C-7f. 1976-77 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 161,250 144,750 144,750 131,250 300 300 150 300 511,550 495,050 494,900 481,550 325,800 315,000 304,200 837,350 810,050 785,750 I'. 1; 810,050 494,900 315,150 ' ~ 20,417 ' 369,672 346,083 335,567 7,000 6,000 8,000 14,000 12,000 9,000 390,672 364,083 352,567 446,678 445,967 433,183 I - - - - - - - - - .. .. - .. .. - - - .... ... .. - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0,--1__ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 FUND #2 .ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Treatment Plant Expansion Reserve for Facilities to Comply with State Water Resources Control Board's Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California Contract 2-14-1, Santa Ana River Interceptor Trunk to Katella Contract 2-14-2, Santa Ana River Interceptor from Katella to La Palma Contract 2-14-3, 4 & 5, Santa Ana River Interceptor from La Palma to County Line Contract 2-15, Yorba Linda Pump Station Contract 2-16-1 & 2, Kraemer Inter- ceptor & Yorba Linda Force Main Contract 2-17-1 & 2, Palm Drive Interceptor Contract 2-18, Carbon Canyon Inter. Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon Project Master Plan Report Liability to Anaheim for South Santa Ana River Trunk South Santa Ana River Interceptor District Facilities Improvements and Extensions Reserve Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Tax Collection Expense Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Fees Joint Works Equity Sale Sale of Capacity Rights Federal and State Grants Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1,693,509,087 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% OELINQ. $ 1,608,833,633 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2544 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE Will RAISE $ 160,883 APPROVED BUDGET 1q71,175 10,067,490 975,000 585,000 2,537,000 APPROVED BUDGET 1975176 ** EST I HATED ACTUAL XPENDITURES 1q7c:.:-7f'> 7,765,644 4,804,449 2,892,000 6,766,000 12,051,000* 5,433,263 911J000 561,000 467,345 I· 503,000 1,175,000 1,035,010 638,000 1,643,000 10,000 100,000 478,000 125,000 686,000 10,000 180,000 1,893,000 ' .. ,, 35,392 3,971 83,828 5,798 1' 300 1 '300 900 9,500 10,000 9,212 24,746,290 27,827,944 11,879,168 13,157,935 12,565,837 53,000 43,000 75,637 126,356 1,598,000 5,758,000 765,000 21,533,928 3,212,362 80,000 205,008 6,162,000 4,442,000 853,000 24,350,845 3,477,099 27,827,944 11,879, 168 15,948, 776 3,665,230 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 6,532,729 2,892,000 7,006,000 52,000 342,000 686,000 350,000 *** 46,000 745,000 8,690,000 2,000 11,600 1,000 27,356,329 12,283,546 62,000 136,000 64,281 7,042,000 3,025,000 650,000 23,262,827 4,093,502 *Rehudgctcd at total cost to complete project. SAWPA cost offset by Revenue item, Sale of Capacity Rights **Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2 ***Balance payable 6-30-76 $183,816 COUNTY S/\N IT I\ TI ON n 1srn1 CT NO. _2_ FUND -#2 FACILITIES REVOLVING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Connection F~c Administration Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees District Facilities Improvements and Extensions Reserve TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVE~UE Carry-Over & Reserve (Cash & Invest's) 7/1 Connection Fees Interest Income TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES ' - BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 197G/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1,693,509,087 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,608,833,633 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ -0- 0NE CENT IN TAX RAT~ \./ILL RAISE $ 160,883 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q71,175 1975/76 XPENDITURES 1q7r._-7~. 1976-77 35,000 35,000 60,738 45,000 400 400 250 400 1,153,367 2,109,424 3,621,328 1,188,767 2,144,824 61,038 3,666,728 ': , ; ' 463,767 1,354,824 2,616,728 700,000 700,000 ·•····. 900,000 ': . 25,000 90,000 • < 150,000 . 1,188,767 2,144,824 3,666,728 -0--0-•• -0- ;;_ k '": ·t. I'> <; ?-: .. ··.· .. , -' ,,. ; .. .. - - - - - - - - - - - .. - ~- - - I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I • I ( 7/29/76 COUNTY SANITATION.DISTRICT NO. 2 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Through Projects Dist~ No. 2 UEstream Total 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reaches 2, 3 & 4 (Contract No. 2-14-3) 604,000 3,623,000 4,227,000 1,042,000 3,185,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reach 5 (Contract No. 2-14-4) 335,000 5,071,000 5,406,000 3,503,000 1,903,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor, Reaches 6, 7 & 8 (Contract No. 2-14-5) 2,617,000 2,617,000 699,000 1,918,000 Yorba Linda Pump Station (Contract No. 2-15) 805,000 805,000 753,000 52,000 Kraemer Interceptor (Contract No. 2-16-1) 631,000 631,000 629,000 2,000 Yorba Linda Force Main (Contract No. 2-16-2) 847,000 847,000 507,000 340 ,000 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor 686,000 686,000 343,000 343 ,000 Sleepy Hollow-Carbon Canyon Project 350,000 350,000 100,000 250,000 South Santa Ana River Interceptor 745,000 745,000 745,000 Orchard Interceptor 223,000 223,000 223,000 Richfield Interceptor 475,000 475,000 475,000 Other Small Projects 475,000 475,000 100,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 6,176,000 11,311,000 17,487,000 7,133,000 7,943,000 1,413,000 100,000 100,000 798,000 Water Reclamation Plant 12,500,000 12,500!000 25,000,000 72 ,000 1!000,000 12,500,000 11,428,000 18,676,000 23' 811 !000 42,487!000 7,205!000 7!943!000 1!413,000 1,100,000 12!600!000 12!226,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FL~ FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 DESCRIPTION 76-77 77-78 78-79 79-80 80-81 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS $ 17,089,000 $ 18,463,000 $ 20,259,000 $ 20,878,000 $ 21,954,000 REVENUE Tax Revenue (at c~rrent tax rate of $.3479) 5.599,000 5,776,000 5.957,000 6,144,000 6,334,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 3,025,000 7,002,000 10,654,ooo 13,239,000 9,391,000 Fees 1,077,000 991 ,000 928,000 897,000 868,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 7,042,000 20,000 20,000 1,641,000 1,689,000 Miscellaneous 1 ,076,000 1 ,057,000 1 '139. 000 1,173,000 1 ,227,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 34,908,000 $ 33,309,00 $ 38,957,000 $ 43,972,000 $41,463,000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 7,943,000 $ 1'413, 000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 798,000 Share of Joint ~forks Construction 6,043,000 7,219,000 14' 141 ,000 17,564,000 11,610,000 Bond Retirement & Interest 539,000 525,000 510,000. 446,000 433,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 90,000 92,000 92,000 Share of Joint Operating 1,602,000 2,379,000 2,802,000 3,312,000 5,969,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 318,000 1,514,000 436,000 504,000 531 ,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 16,445,000 $ 13,050,000 $ 18,079,000 $ 22,018,000 $ 19,433,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 18,463,000 $ 20,259,000 $ 20,878,000 $ 21 ,954,000 $ 22,030,000 Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments 7' 182 ,000 9,167,000 11, 126,000 9,830,000 6,081 ,000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 11 ,281 ,000 $ 11 ,092,000 $ 9.752,000 $ 1 2 , 1 2 4 • 000 $ 15,949,000 One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise $ 160,883 $ 168,927 $ 177 ,373 $ 186,242 $ 195,554 I ( I I I r I I I ( I I I I I I I I ( I I - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - - - COUNTY S!\NITATlON D'STP~.GJ __ J_!_:~ _ _._3_ BUDGET REGOMMEND:\TJONS 1 ;7r>-77 FISCAL YEAR &: RESERVE ~-35 BUDGETED REQUIREMEf~T DOLLAR. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 27 ,.~ .. )8,~33, ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND .).79 TAX REVENUE DOLLAR ' TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 3,~61,·)13 SOURCE CARRY-OVER &: RESERVE $.55 OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR TOTAL AVAILABLE $ 27 ,..i.:.3, ~33 •Rounded to neor1,t -:er-• I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 2000F 1950 1900 1850 1800 1750 Cl) c::= s 1700 ..J g 1650 LI.. 1600 0 1550 Cl) ~ 1500 :3 1450 -;: 1400 1350 1300 72 73 73 74 75 76 . 74 75 76 77 FISCAL YEAR · TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION ' I I I I I I so 49 48 (/) 47 ... 46 z UJ 4s I u 44 43 42 41 I TR.END CHARTS 72/73 "THROUGH 75/76 f 73 74 74 75 76 75 76-. 77 FIS CAL YEAR TAX RATE I I I I 34 ~ 32 30 28 26 (/) 0: 24 < ..J ..J .22 0 0 20 . LL. 0 18 (/) 16 z .0 ..J 14 ..J ::;: 12 10 8 6 72 73 BUDGETED REQUIREMENTS CASH EXPENSE 73 74. 74 75 FI S C A L 75 76 YE AR 76 n TOTAL BUDGET 8 EXPE:~DJTURES I I ( • f I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NO. 3 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 2,052,079,825 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,949,475,834 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .4231 SUMMARY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 194, 94 7 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE REQUIREMENTS Operating Fund Bonds & Interest Funds -1951 & 58 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Invest's) Other Revenue and Transfers TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS· TO BE RAISED BY TAXES TAX RATE Operating Fund Bond & Interest Funds -1951 & 58 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL TAX RATE *Adjusted for interfund transfers APPROVED BUDGET 1974176 2,675,264 1,322,330 25,884,896 1,005,987 30,888,477 15,499,499 8,580,792 24,080,291 6,808,186 Actual --- .0648 .0472 .3460 -0- .4580 APPROVED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET 1975/76 1976/77 3,283,762 3,412,199 1,277,554 1,248,715 27,115,000 19,358,201 30,400* 3,449,768 31, 706, 716 27,468,883 17,384,267 13,989,265 6,950,000* 5,228,000 24,334,267 19,217,265 7,372,449 8,251,618 Actual --- .0894 .0524 .0429 .0352 .3214 .3355 -0--0- .4537 .423i The County is presently impounding taxes in connection with a dispute over the assessed valuation of oil properties. Taxes impounded as of June 30th amount to $24,043. COUNTY SAN IT AT ION DI STR I CT NO. _3 FUND . #3 OPERATING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Manhole Repairs Pump Station Maintenance Permit & Ind. Waste Adm. Inter~Dist. Sewer Use Chg. Bond Collection Expense Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Treasurer's Banking Fee Utilities Professional Services Printing and Publication Membership Travel & Meeting -Directors Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL OPERATING NON-OPERATING Interest Expenses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL NON-OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income & Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Transfer from District No. 4 Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASI! & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *AdjusteJ for authorized budget transfers BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 2,052,079,825 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR DELINQ. $ 1,949,475,834 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0524 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 194,947 APPROVED BUDGET 1 q7li/75 11, 500 1,333,264 60,000 75,000 50,000 36,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 800 • 45,000 10,000 1,000 1,700 1,000 1,632,264 5,000 5,000 1,637,264 220,000 818,000 2,675,264 1,518,886 12,000 49,323 5,000 122,500 1,707,709 967,555 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 ESTIMATED ACTUAL ~XPENDITURES 1 C:7C)-7f.. 12,800 .9,900 1,664,462 1,178,724 70,000 125,000 50,000 36,000 2,000 1,000 3,500 •· 800 ,, ' 55,000 I I' 10,000: 3,000 2,000 1,000 . 50* ·.·· 42,053 13,364 21,651 31,166 666 762 3,803 500 47,001 281 1,596 669 12 2,036,612 1,352,148 1.200 5,000 6,200 I 1:.175 1,175 2,042,812 1,353,323 219 '950"' 1,021,000 3,283,762 1,658, 720 9,000 20,000 150,000 1,837,720 1,446,042 3,283,762 1,353,323 1,930,439 271, 269 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 12,800 1,666,099 75,000 125,000 50,000 40,000 1,000 1,000 2,700 1,000 1,300 60,000 20,000 1,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 2;061,899 2,300 4,000 6,300 2,068,199 310,000 1,034,000 3,412,199 2,201,708 17,000 21,000 150,000 2,389,708 1,022,491 - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~3~ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976177 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VJ\l.UATION $ 2,052,079,825 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5°0 DELINQ. $ 1,949,475,834 1976/77 EST. TAX RJ\TE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0352 FUND # 3 BOND & INTEREST _ 1951 & 58 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WI LL RA I SE $ 194, 94 7 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RE COMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BU~GET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1cnt1/7S 1975/76 :XPENDITURES 1976-77 1q1r:_7(-, BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 Interest on Bonds 262,334 241,546 241,546 220,758 Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees 400. 400 175 400 TOTAL 797,734 776' 946 776' 721 756,158 AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 524~596 500,608 492,557 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,322,330 1,277,554 1, 248, 715 .. LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE > ,,:, "'' Funds Available July 1 .. Budgeted Requirements 75/76 ' 1,277,554 Actual Expenditures 75/76 t 776, 721 500,833 • Allowance for Accruals, Other .. Income and Transfers } 39,013 CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) 588,433 556,488 , ... 539,846 :-< Delinquent Taxes 8,000 6,000 ... 7,000 1: Interest & Misc. Receipts 22,000 16,000 15,000 TOTAL CASH & REVENUE 618,433 578,488 ' 561,846 l AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 703,897 699,066 : 686,869 ' ,,.: ) ' Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 .;: •. $7,024,000 : : «: ·.· i . COUNTY S/\N IT I\ TI ON DI STR I CT NO I _3_ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 FUND #3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS ANO EXPENDITIJRES Treatment Plant Expansion Reserve for Facilities to comply with State Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California Reimburse Other CSD's for Seal Beach Blvd. P~mp Station Equity Convert Westside Pump Station to Lift Station Purchase Nichols Street Sewer from CSD #11 Contract 3-18, Knott Trunk -Reach 4 Imperial Relief Interceptor (Contract 3-19) Westside Relief Interceptor (Contract 3-21) Knott Interceptor -Reaches 5-8 (Contract 3-20) Westminster Ave. Force Main (Unit 2) Joint Works Equity Purchase District Facilities Improvements & Extensions & Reserves Investment Adm. Fees Treasurer's Tax Collection Expense Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Joint Works Equity Sale Federal and State Grants Due from City of Stanton Due from City of Seal Beach Transfer from Fae Rev Fund Sale of Capacity Rights Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUJ\'T TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for authorized budfet transfers **Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2. 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 2,052,079,825 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,949,475,834 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .3355 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 194,947 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED BUDGET OUDGET ACTUAL 1q71,17r; 1975/76 '"XPENDITURES 1 '171)-7(.. ** 10,973,296 8,559,650 5,344,392 . 157,000 157,0001 85,400 85,400 I< ! 17,000 r 132,0QQ I; 3,200,000 383,000 18,447 •••• I•;· 845,000 135,000 I 376 1,322,000 2,427,000 i:,:: , 582' 772 ;, 9,121,000 13,431,000 ) 6,390,734 :•. .. :·•. 39, 200 I< I• 39,200 :• 150,000 1, 750, 500* 60,495 I 1,200 1,200 •.• 675 ·:· 13,000 14,000 ..... 13,817 .... 50* ;: 10 25,884,896 27, 115 ,000 13,450,918 F. L .:· .,. 13,012,019 13,964,377 46,000 50,000 53,754 6,563,000 5,183,000 236,000 94,389 1,844,282 1,000 34,000 742,000 812,000 20,748,162 21,887,659 5,136,734 5,227,341 ·. .. . .. 27, 115, 000 13,450,918 13,664,082 4,916,139 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 7,234,937 296,000 85,400 971, 000 5,757,000 920,000 73,464 4,000,000 1,400 18,000 1,000 19,358,201 8,747,943 56,000 3,350,000 227,000 35,000 400,000 12,815,943 6,542,258 .. - - - - - - - ... - - - f L - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY S~NITATION DISTRICT N0.~3 FUND #3 FACILITIES REVOLVING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Connection Fee Administration Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Transfer to ACO Fund District Facilities Improvements and Extensions and Reserve TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Carry-Over & Reserve (Cash & Investments) 7/1 Connection Fees Interest Income TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prclim: 7-19-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 2,052,079,825 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 1,949,475,834 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ -0- 0NE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 194,947 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUJ\L BUDGET 1q74175 1975/76 ~XPEND I TURES 1976-77 1 C:7t;-7£'.. 30,000 30,000 78,080 40,000 . 400 400 275 400 1,844,282 ; ' 975,587 3,409,368 1,005,987 1,874,682 78,355 3,449,768 ' >· ). /> 380,987 1,204,682 ' 2,499,768 :· • 600,000 600,000 .•. 800,000 .: 25,000 70,000 150,000 1,005,987 1,874,682 3,449,768 -0--0-[' -0- '; :.:': V'' ,, ( ~,, > f/ k -Ii ,, ,. r-,· ; I 7/29/76 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Through Project Total 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 Additional Pumps at Seal Beach Boulevard Pump Station 265,000 265,000 Knott Interceptor -Portion of Reach 7 (Contract 3-20-2) 4,373,000 4,024,000 349,000 Knott Interceptor -Portion of Reach 7 & Reach 8 (Contract 3-20-3) 5,490,000 82,000 1,000,000 4,408,000 Westside Relief Interceptor -Reaches 27, 28 & 29 (Contract 3-21-2) 1,150,000 179,000 971,000 Katella Relief Interceptor 192,000 192,000 Orangethorpe Relief Trunk -Reaches 15, 16 & 16A 2,070,000 1,070,000 1,000,000 Westminster Avenue Force Main (2nd Unit) 920,000 500,000 420,000 Crescent Relief Trunk -Reach 14 258,000 258,000 Magnolia Interceptor Englargement -Reach 30 270,000 270,000 Lampson Interceptor -Reaches 11 & 12 410,000 410,000 Other Small Projects 400,000 100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 15,798,000 4,285,000 1,920,000 1,495,000 4,748,000 1,145,000 2,205,000 ( I I I I I I I I I I ( • I I I I I I I ' I . I I I I ' DESCRIPTION CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.4231 ) Other Revenue Federal & State Participation Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Miscellaneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EXPENDITURES District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement & Interest I I I I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 76-77 $13,989,000 8,252,000 3,350,000 821 ,000 35,000 1,022,000 $ 27' 469 '000 $ 1 ,920 ,000 6,693,000 756,000 77-78 $15,812,000 8,513,000 7,418,000 724,ooo 557,000 875,000 $ 33,899,000 $ 1 ,495,000 7,995,000 736,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury Share of Joint Operating 1 ,666,000 622,000 2,474,000 552,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Carry-Over Oalance to Following Fiscal Year Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise $ 11,657 ,000 $ 13,252,000 $ 15' 812' 000 $20,647,000 6,745,000 12,534,000 $ 9,067 ,000 $ 8' 113 ,000 $ 194,947 $ 204,694 I I 78-79 $20,647,000 8,784,009 11,799,000 627,000 22,000 1 ,085,000 $42,964,000 $ 4 '748 ,000 15 ,661 ,000 716,000 91 ,000 2,914,000 618,000 $24,748,ooo $ 18,216,000 18,084,000 $ 132,000 $ 214,929 I I 79-80 $18,216,000 9,061 ,000 14,662,000 531 ,000 1,817 ,000 980,000 $45,267,000 $ 1 '145 '000 19,452,000 696,000 91 ,000 3,444,000 722 '000 $25,550,000 $19,717,000 11,591,000 $ 8' 126 ,000 $ 225,676 ·I ( 80-81 $19,717,000 9,343,000 10,400,000 435,000 1 ,871 ,000 1 ,025,000 $42,791 ,000 $ 2,205,000 12,858,000 676,000 93,000 6,208,000 835,000 $22,875,000 $19,916,000 7,598,000 $12,318,000 $ 236,960 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ·OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YE AR "' '":J - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANIT:.:•n~J r~l~~T_:1J_CT N_Q..:_J_ BUDGET RECOi~H!:Ei·JDATIONS --·---·-· 1976-77 FISCl~L YEAR TREAT:.ACNT PLANT EXPANSION 6: RESERVE DISTRIOT f:AOILITIES EXPANSION 8: .RESERVE BUDGETED REQUIREMENT DOLLAR~ TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 5,336,972 TAX LEVY .~.23 SOURCE CARRY-OVER 8: . RESERVE $.SO OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR TOTAL AVAILABLE $ 5,336,972 ACOUMULATED CAP ITAL OUTLAY f'UND TAX REVENUE DOLLAR i TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 1, 234,032 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _s_ 750 700 en c: 5 650 - ..J g 600 - 550 LL. 0 500 Cl) z 450 0 ~ 400 ~ 250 :::E ---------' --~'~~' 72 73 74 75 76 73 74 75 76 77 FISCAL YEAR TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION ( I I I I I I TR.END CHARTS -72/73 'TH R 0 UGH .· 76/77 30 29 28 Cl) 27 ... 26 +==----+----i-----lf----~ z u 24 23 22 21 72 ·73 I 73 74 I 74 75 76 75 76 77 FIS CAL YEAR TAX RATE f I I • 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 (./) crS.O c:r ..J ..J4 5 o· 0 4.0 . LL. 0 3.5 . ~3.0 .0 j2.5 -~2.0 1.5 1.0 .s 72 73 74 . 73 74 75 FI SC AL BUDGETED REQUIREMENTS CASH EXPENSE 75 76 YE AR 76 77 TOTAL BUDGET 8 EXPE:~DITURES I ( f I I I I - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NO. 5 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim: 7-29-76 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE REQUIREMENTS Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Accumul~ted Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Investments) Other Revenue and Transfers ·TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 506,326,490 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 481,010,166 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2564 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 48,101 APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1974176 1975/76 1976/77 856,854 902,644 803,199 54,335 53,510 52,685 3,030,060 3,321,619 4,030,977 328,285 319,198 450,111 4,269,534 4,596,971 5,336,972 1,910,125 2,315,382 2,679,390 1,480,144 1,280,197 1,423,550 3,390,269 3,595,579 4,102,940 DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS. TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 879,265 1,001,392 1,234,032 TAX RATE Actual Actual --- Operating Fund .0974 .1035 .0358 Bond and Interest Fund -1951 .0080 .0070 .0051 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund .1539 .1478 .2155 Facilities Revolving Fund -0--0--0- TOTAL TAX RATE .2593 .2583 . 2564 .. r COUNTY Sf\NITATION DISTRICT NO._s_ FUND . #5 OPERATING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Manhole and Line Repairs Pump Station Maintenance Wet Well Repairs Permit & Ind. Waste Adm. Bond Collection Expense Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Treasurer's Banking Fee Utilities Professional Services Printing and Publication Memberships Travel & Meeting -Directors Uncollectable Accounts Total Operating NON-OPERA TI NG Interest Expenses Applicable to Prior Years Total Non-Operating TOTAL OPERATING & NON OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AUTIIORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for transfer from unappropriated reserve BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976177 FISCAL YEAR Prclim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ S06,326,490 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR S% DELINQ. $ 481,010,166 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .03S8 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 48,101 APPROVED BUDGET 1q71,17r:, 2,400 235,204 30,000 100,000* 65,000 25,000 16,000 100 1,000 800 • 48,000* 2,500 1,000 400 lSO 527,SS4 3,300 2,000 S,300 S32,8S4 66,000* 2S8,000 856,8S4 48S,380 4,000 33,000 522,380 334 ,474 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 EST I MATED ACTUAL ~XPENDITURES 1qc;-7f, 3,000 297,824 30 ,000 I I 2S,OOO Ii 7S,OOO '. 30,000 1' 10,000 100 1 ' 1: 1,200 800 I: :f ;'.·.·. 60' 000 ~ . 2,500 ;,. 3,000 :. 470 I 1: lSO I I< 539,044 Ji . 4 ,600 :;:: 2,000 : ... 6,600 .2,600 201,073 23,837 8,7S4 66,066 8,216 SS 1,0Sl 400 47,955 34S 399 84 360,835 4.,s22 805 5,327 S45,644 .•. 366,162 8S,OOO 272,000 902,644 467,S66 4,SOO 30,025 502,091 400,553 I 902,644 366' 162 S36,482 ~55,769 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 3,000 277,599 30,000 78,000 10,000 100 500 1,000 300 60,000 3,000 1,SOO 500 300 500 ·466, 299 3,900 2,000 5,900 472, 199 95,000 236,000 803,199 S92,2Sl 5,400 1,000 32,000 630,651 172,548 - - - - - - .. - ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY Sf\NITf\TION DISTRICT N0.~5A . FUND #5 BOND & INTEREST -1951 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest en Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AUTIIORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requir~!ments 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Inte:t;"est & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $316,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 509,701,410 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 484,216,340 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0051 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 48,421 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1 q71,175 1975/76 XPENDITURES 1976-77 15J.5.-.7f. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 9,515 8,965 3,965 8,415 200 200 25 200 29,715 29,165 28,990 28,615 24,620 24,345 24 1 070 ' 54,335 53,510 52 1 685 f !:· r ;· '· 53,510 { 28,990 ' 24,520 ·::' :; . 2,809 ,'.; . 25,907 25,421 ;'-27,329 '• 200 200 . 200 ;;; t . 500 250 . 250 26,607 25' 871 27' 779 ·. "· 27, 728 27,639 24,906 IL !' , .. •.• I··•, :f. ;· I•• " .• r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~5~ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 FUND #5 ACCU~IULATED CAPITAL OUTIJ\Y DESCRIPTION.OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Treatment Plant Expansion Reserve for Facilities to comply with State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean lhters of California Joint Works Equity Purchase Back Bay Drive Sewer (East Side) Replace Pumps at "A" Street, 14th Street & Lido Pump Stations Install Lido Force Main Valve NIWA Project Master Plan Update District Facilities Improvements and Extensions Reserve Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Tax Collection Expense Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Federal and State Grants Loan in Aid of Construction Due from CSD #6 for Equity in Facilities Sale of Capacity Rights Incerest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 506,326,490 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 481,010,166 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2155 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 48,101 APPROVEli BUDGET 1q7t,17r:, APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 EST I MATED ACTUAL XPENDITURES 1qr:,-7~. 2,145,859 1,723,385* 1,151,393 453,000 535,000 108,901 150,734 150,734 1 30,000 20,000 270,000 1,000 1,300 ;.: I•' 11,000 .. , .. 20 J 000 ;:.:. 10,000 ,. '"·· .....•. ~· 869,000 1,000 . 1,500 . 7,495 9,908 806 550 1,507 3,030,060 3,321,619 1,322,393 1,205,553 1,578,197 3,000 6,000 1,227,000 985,000 105,000 8,144 15,197 69,300 59,025 2,512,997 2,748,419 517' 063 573,200 ii ~ .•.• ·.·•·•.··. ~···· 3,321,619 1,322,393 1,999,226 274,527 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 1,483,414 750,000 128,563 500,000 8,000 5,000 25,000 1,126,600 1,200 2,700 500 4 ,030' 977 1,724,699 7,700 687,000 500,000 15,000 60,000 2,994,399 1,036,578 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .... COUNTY S~NITATION DISTRICT NQ,~5~ FUND . #5 FACILITIES REVOLVING DESCRIPTION.OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITIJRES Replace Portions of Bayside Drive Sewer Replace Pumps at Rocky Point & Bitter Point Pump Stations Bay Bridge Pump Station Additions Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Connection Fee Administration District Facilities Improvements and Extensions and Reimbursement Agreements Payable TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Connection Fees Interest Income TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Outstandin~ Agreement Irvine Company $109,689 - " BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 506,326,490 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR DELINQ. $ 481,010,166 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ ONE CENT IN TAX RATE Will RAISE $ 48,101 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1cn1,175 1975/76 XPENDI TURES 1976-77 1'17!)-7(-. 40,000 60,000 130,000 . 25,000 20,000 . 1,490 13,000 150,000 170,000 400 400 200 400 . 5,100 ·• .• .. 262,885 88, 793-.1'' 131,611 328,285 319,198 1,690 450,111 . f :.· '·· 319,198 1,690 ·::,: 317,508 /: 17,603 193,285 244,198 ::.• 335' 111 tr 125,000 65,000 { 102,000 10,000 10,000 13,000 328,285 319,198 450,111 .. -0--0--0- ~ . :.: ( I f 7/29/76 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 5 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Project Total 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 Replace Portion of Bayside Drive Sewer 130,000 70,000 60,000 Back Bay Drive Sewer 500,000 500,000 *Ne\\· Santa Ana River Crossing 300,000 300,000 Bay Bridge Pump Station Additions 170,000 20,000 150,000 Bay Bridge Force Main Relocation 100,000 100,000 Miscellaneous Projects 400,000 100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,600,000 690,000 385,000 375,000 75,000 75,000 *Partially Funded by District No. 6 NOTE: Extension of Bayside Drive Sewer not included in above. Tilis project to be funded by Irvine Company and reimbursed from connection fees. Reimbursement does not commence until line is extended to the city boundary. I I I ( I I f I I I I I I ( ( ( l I I I ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 DESCRIPTION CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS REVENUE fax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.2564) Other Revenue Federal & State Participation Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Loan in Aide of Construction Mi see 11 aneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EXPEND I TURES District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction & Equity Bond Retirement & Interest Repay Loan in Aide of Construction Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury Share of Joint Operating District Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise 76-77 $2,679,000 1,234,000 687,000 103,000 15,000 500,000 119 ,000 $5,337,000 $ 690,000 1,372,000 28,000 277,000 338,ooo $2,705,000 $2,632,000 1,564,000 $1,068,000 $ 48, 101 77-78 $2,632,000 1,294,000 1, 521, 000 142,000 113,000 117,000 $5,819,000 $ 385,000 1,639,000 28,000 100,000 412,000 445,000 $3,009,000 $2,810,000 2,415,000 $ 395,000 $ 50,506 I ( 78-79 79-80 80-81 $2,810,000 $2,088,000 $1,719,000 1,357,000 1,423,000 1,492,000 2,419,000 3,006,000 2,132,000 89,000 76,000 76,000 4,000 372,000 383,000 117,000 88,ooo 40,000 $6,796,000 $7,053,000 $5,842,000 $ 375,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 3 '211, 000 3,988,000 2,636,000 27,000 27,000 26,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 6,000 6,000 6,ooo 486,000 574,000 1 ,034 ,000 503,000 564,ooo 635,000 $4,708,000 $5,334,000 $4,512,000 $2,088,000 $1, 719 ,000 $1 ,330,000 2,729,000 2,320,000 1,500,000 $ (641,000) $ (601,000) $ (170,000) $ 53,031 $ 55,682 $ 58,467 - .... .... - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR - - - r.ouNTY s A NtT:~JJ.Q!·} ____ PJ$T_BJ_GT ____ No. 6 BUDGET RECOiv'iMEND1\Tl_Q1.L~ 197 S-77 FiSCAL YE f~ R TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION cl RESERVE BUDGETED RECUIREMENT DOLLAR. TOTAL REQUIREMEf\JTS $ +,1):).S ,•198 "BOND I F'UND / $7 I ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY F'UUD $.·30 TAX REVENUE DOLLAR i TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $'f·t),912 CARRY-OVER &: RESERVE :; .62 SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVt:NUE DOLLAR . T 0 TA L AVAIL A 8 LE $ ~-, o 3 c , 4 J 3 •Rounded to nearest cent ·--~----------·--------.-~--·-·-··--- I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _6 _ en c: 750 700 :5 650 ..J 0 600 -0 LL.. 550 0 500 ti) z 450 0 :::1 4 00 :i 350 300 250 72 73 73 74 75 76 74 75 16 n FISCAL YEAR TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION ( I ·1 I I I I TR.END CHAR TS · 72/73 'TH R 0 UGH .· i6/71 30[ 29 28 Cl) 27 t-26 z 25 l.LI u 24 - 23~---t--- 22 21 I 73 74 74 75 76 75 76 77 ·FIS CAL YEAR .TA~ RAT~ I I I 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 ~5.o c::r . ..J ..J4. 5 0 0 4.0 • LL. 0 3.5 . ~3.0 .o j2.5 :E2.o -- 1.5 72 73 BUDGETED REQU I REMElffS CASH EXPENSE 73 7<1 . 74 75· FI SC AL -RA I SEO BY TAXES 75 76 16 n YE AR TOTAL BUDGg_.-i-8 EXPE:~DfTURES • I I ( I - - .. - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT N0. ____ 6 _ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim; 7-29-76 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 349,533,170 1976/77 EST. A. V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 332, 056, 512 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2239 SUMMARY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 33,205 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE REQUIREMENTS Operating Fund Bond and Interest -1951 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Investments) Other Revenue and Transfers TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES TAX RATE Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund TOTAL TAX RATE APPROVED BUDGET 1974176 557,395 67,004 3,138,924 3,763,323 1,907,985 1,277,398 3,185,383 577,940 Actual .1073 .0132 .1070 .2275 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 628,047 65,816 3,268,137 3,962,000 2,318,844 1,017,302 3,336,146 625.854 Actual .0847 .0118 .1296 .2261 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976177 575,459 64,598 3,396,441 4,036.498 2,510,321 782,265 3,292,586 743,912 .0352 .0097 .1790 .2239 COUNTY S/\NITATION DISTRICT N0._6_ FUND. #6 OPERATING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Manhole & Line Reconstruction Pump Station Maintenance Wet Well Repairs Permit & Ind. Waste Adm. Bond Collection Expense Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fee Treasurer's Banking Fee Utilities Professional Services Printing and Publication Membership Travel & Meeting -Directors' Uncollectable Accounts Total Operating NON-OPERATING Expenses Applicable to Prior Years Total Non-Operating TOTAL OPER~TING & NON-OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AUTIIORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for authorized budget transfer BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 349,533,170 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5~.; DELINQ. $ 332,056,512 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0352 ONE CENT IN TAX fV\TE WILL RAISE $ 33,205 APPROVED APPROVED ESTi MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET . ACTUAL BUDGET tci71,17r; 1975/76 '"XPENDITURES 1 C)7!:-7f, 1976-77 2,400 3,000 . 2,350 3,000 248,395 302,907 203,984 278,609 16,000 16,000 9,469 16,000 20,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 6,090 10,000 6,000 6,000 8,000 7,000 3,607 7,000 100 100 55 100 800 800 618 400 800 800 425 1,000 300 . 3,900* 5,000 3,309 5,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 3,000 266 1,500 300 340 I: 249 350 100 100 57 300 400 315,795 360,047 230,479 "325,459 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 317,795 362,047 230,479 327,459 81,600* , 85,000 85,000 158,000 181,000 163,000 557,395 628,047 575,459 628,047 230,479 397,568 34,236 261,684 365,881 431,804 2,000 2,900 2,700 3,500 4,000 4,000 18,500 20,020 20,000 285,684 392,801 458,504 _271,711 235,246 116,955 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY S/\NITATION DISTRICT N0._6_ FUND . #6 BOND & INTEREST -l 951 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RE-TIRntENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fee TOTAL AU11IORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIRE~ffiNTS LESS: CASI I CARRY -OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES · Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $312,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 349,533,170 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 332,056,512 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0097 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 33,205 APPROVED BUDGET 1 q]lt/75 25,000 11, 328 200 36,528 30,476 67,004 32,443 400 500 33,343 33,661 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 EST I MATED ACTUAL XPENDITURES 1qc;_-7F. RECOMMEfWED BUDGET 1976-77 25,000 9,734 200 34,934 29.664 64.598 31,701 350 300 32.351 32.247 COUNTY Sf\NIT/\TION DisrnICT N0._6 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 349,533,170 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5~ DELINQ. $ 332,056,512 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .1790 FUND . #6 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 33,205 APPROVED APPROVED EST 11·:1\ TED RECOMMrnDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET .ACTUAL BUDGET 1 q71t/75 1975/76 '"XPENDITURES 1<-17~-7(. 1976-77 PROJECTS AND EXPENDITIJRES Treatment Plant Expansion 1,962,024 1,528,137* 94.S, 111 1,277,141 Reserve for F~cilities to comply with State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California 750,000 1,167,000 1,400,000 Magnetic Meters 40,000 64,000 725 70,000 Replace Pwnps at Rocky Point & Bitter Point Pump Stations 14,000 14,000 538 9,000 Realign & Lower Dover Trunk 30,000 48,000 50,000 Distrjct Facilities Improvements and Extension Reserve 236~000 340,000 3,391 587,000 Purchase Additional Capacity in Coast Highway Facilities 105,000 105,000 Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees 1,000 1,000 550 1,200 Tax Collection Expense . 900 1,000 936 1,600 Uncollectable Accounts 500 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 3,138,924 3,268,137 951,251 3,396,441 LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 :· .. · Budgeted Requirements 75/76 3,268, 137 Actual Expenditures 75/76 951,251 2,316,886 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers 270,070 CARRY-OVER (CASH & !~'VEST'S) 1,613,858 1,920,757 2,046,816 Delinquent Taxes 3,000 2,900 4,000 Joint Works Equity Sale 18,498 -45,915 Federal and State Grants 1,122,000 873,000 592,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 7,700 13,482 13,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 101,300 100, 300 100.000 TOTAL CASH & REVHRJE 2,866,356 2,910,439 I 2.801,731 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 272,568 357,698 594. 710 *Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2 - - - .. - - - - - - - ... - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I ( ' 7/29/76 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Project Total 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 1981-82 Magnetic Meters & Vault -Dover Drive & Newport 70,000 70,000 Realign & Lower Dover Trunk 50,000 50,000 *New Santa Ana River Crossing 120,000 120,000 Miscellaneous Projects 150,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Sub-Total 390,000 120.000 75,000 145,000 25,000 25,000. -·----- Purchase Additional Capacity in Coast Highway Facilities 150,000 150,000 Gisler Trunk Relief Sewer 996,000 996,000 Grand Total 1,536,000 120., 000 75,000 145,000 25,000 25,000 1,146,000 I DESCRIPTION CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.2239) Other Revenue Federal & State Participation Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Miscellaneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EXPENDITURES District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement & lntere~t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _2.._ STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 76-77 $ 2 ,510,000 744,000 592,000 4,000 13,000 173,000 $ 4,036,000 $ 120,000 1'182 '000 35,000 77-78 $ 2,368,000 778,000 1 ,310,000 4,000 97,000 119 ,000 $ 4' 676' 000 $ 75,000 1'412 '000 34,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury Share of Joint Operating 279,000 52,000 413,000 70,000 ( District Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments Fund Balance ~r (Deficit) One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise *Note $1, 146,000 required for 81-82 I I I I I I $ 1 ,668,ooo $ 2,004,000 $ 2,368,000 $ 2 ,672 ,000 1,013,000 1'776 ,000 $ 1,355,000 $ 896,000 $ 33,205 $ 34,865 I I I I I 78-79 $2,672,000 815,000 2,083,000 4,000 3,000 135,000 $ 5 '712 '000 $ 145,000 2,764,000 33,000 6,000 487,000 89,000 $ 3,52li,OOO $ 2' 188 ,000 2,099,000 $ 89,000 $ 36,609 I I 79-80 $2' 188,000 853,000 2,588,000 4,000 320,000 112 ,000 $ 6 ,065,000 $ 25 ,000 3,43li,OOO 32,000 6,000 575,000 99,000 $ 4' 171 ,000 $ 1'894 ,000 1,754,ooo $ 140,000 $ 38,439 I I 80-81 $1,894,000 894,000 1,836,000 4,000 330,000 91 ,000 $ 5 ,049 '000 $ 25,000* 2,270,000 31 ,000 6,000 1,038,000 110,000 $ 3 ,480,000 $1,569,000 1 ,610,000 $ (Li 1 '000) $ 40,361 I ( I I - -,. -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - - - BUDGET RECO M rVI EN DATIONS 1976-77 FISCA L YEAR - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATtC'1~_ .PJ.~l-~JCT__ N v. 7 BUDGET R ECO MME N QA Tl Of_~ S 1976-77 Ft SC AL YE AH TREATliAENT PLANT EXPANSION ! RESERVE .S.41 BUDGETED REQU!REMENT DOLLAR& TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 10,877 ,641 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY F'UND. TAX REVENUE DOLLAR I TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 2, 164,013 ---···---'---· ----·-------·--· " INTEREST! OTHER ~.21 CARRY-OVER a: RESERVE SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR TOTAL AVAILABLE $ 10,:77 ,L.41 • Rounde·d to nearest :-•·• -------·--·-- . I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 (/) c: 900 850 800 750 <: 700 .J .J o .JSO 0 La.. 600 0 550 (I) z 0 ~ .J :I! 3001 72 73 73 74 F I I I I 74 75 76 . 75 76 77 S CAL YEAR · TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION ( I l I I • ( so 48 46 Cl) 44 t-42 z 40 w u 38 36 34 32 I TR.END Cr~ARTS 72/73 ·TH ROUGH 76/77 73 74 I 74 75 76 75 76-. 77 FISCAL YEAR TAX RATE I I I I 15.0 14.0 13.0 12.0 11. 0 Cl) crlO. o ct . :fo.o 0 0 8.0 . LL. 01.0 ~6.0 .0 jS.O - ::a4.0 3.0 2.0 1. 0 72 73 73 74 74 75 FI S C A L BUDGETED REQUIREMENTS CASH EXPENSE RAISED BY TAXES 75 76 YE AR 76 77 TOTAL BUDGET 8 EXPE~~DITURES ( I I t I I I - ... .. - - - - .. - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT N0.___._1 _ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 650, 094, 950 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 617,590,203 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .3485 SUMMARY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 61,759 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE REQUIREMENTS Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1962 Bond and Interest Fund -1970 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Construction Fund Fixed Obligation Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Investments) Other Revenue and Transfers .TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES TAX RATE Operating Fund Bond and Interest Fund -1951 Bond and Interest Fund -1962 Bond and Interest Fund -1970 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Fixed Obligation Fund Facilities Revolving Fund TOTAL TAX RATE APPROVED BUDGET 1974/76 915,282 33,588 292,380 771,353 4,699,934 328,091 15,100 1,687,260 8,742,988 4,838,722 2,108,286 6,947,008 1,795,980 Actual .0878 .0025 . 0431 .0970 .1703 .0019 -0- .4026 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 995,691 33,121 288,670 802,353 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976/77 970,634 32,633 292,644 805,952 5,490,073** 5,038,208** 350,745 369,210 15,100 2,441,796 10,417,549 5,695,459 15,100 3,353,260 10,877,641 5,501,573 2,735,045** 3,212,050** 8,430,504 1,987,045 Actual .0728 .0021 .0377 .0866 .1848 .0011 -0- .3851 8,713.623 2.164.018 Actual .0246 .0017 .0317 .0688 .2208 .0009 -0- .3485 Taxes are being impounded in connection with a dispute over the assessed valuation of oil properties. Taxes impounded as of June 30th amount to $1,502. **Adjusted for inter-fund transfers . ! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~1~ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976177 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 FUND . #7 OPERATING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Manhole & Line Repairs (Infiltration) Pump Station Maintenance Connection Administration Inter-Dist. Sewer Use Chg. Bond Collection Expense Treasurer's Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Banking Fee Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Utilities Professional Services Printing and Publication Memberships Special Expense -OPA Travel & Meetings -Directors Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL OPERATING NON-OPERATING Interest Expenses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL NON-OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 7S/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Inco~e and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Due from OPA Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for authorized budget transfers 1976/77 ESTIM~TED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 650,094,9SO 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FORS% DELINQ. $ 617,S90,203 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0246 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 61,iS9 APPROVED BUDGET 1 q74/75 S,100 288,S22 S2,000 20,000 37,000 65,000 2,000 so 1,000 800 24,000* 35,000 1,000 710* 300 S32,482 4,000 3,000 7,000 S39,482 107,800* 268,000 915,282 466,077 3,600 58,000 S27, 677 387,605 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 S,400 340,S16 52,000 37,000 65,000 2,000 : so '·· 1 ,000 . 800 30,000 ' 35,000 ,, ESTIMATED ··ACTUAL XPENDITURES 1cnr:;-7f, .4.87S 227,986 40,218 25,SlS 48, 723 l,6S6 2S 989 3,000 y 825'11 •. 400 17,418 2,461 777 748 ~·.· ,, 300 572,891 5,000 i' 3,000 I 8,000 190 371,981 4,070 lS 4,085 58 0' 891 __ 3_7_6..:.., 0_6_6-f 124 J 80()1 290,000 995,691 571,623 3,800 45,000 620,423 375,268 995,691 376,066 619,625 134,184 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 6,000 324,034 52,000 37,000 65,000 2,000 50 500 700 1,000 30,000 35,000 2,500 658 S,000 500 1,000 562,934 4,700 3,000 7,700 S70,634 115,000 28S,OOO 970,634 753,809 3,700 S,000 6,000 50,000 818,509 152,125 - - - - - - - ... .. - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY S/\N IT /\Tl ON DI ~TRI CT NO. --2.,,1,A, 7B & 1c FUND #7 BOND & INTEREST -1951 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND REITREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AU11IORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Exependitures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMpUNT TO BE R~ISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $176,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976177 FISCAL YEAR Prelirn: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $1,006,216,680 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% OELINQ. $ 995,905,848 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0017 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 95,590 APPROVED BUDGET 1q7~175 13,000 4,973 200 18,173 15,415 33,588 16, 115 200 400 16, 715 16,873 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 13,000 4,668 200 17,868 15,253 33,121 15,698 200 100 15,998 17,123 ESTIMATED ACTUAL ~XPENDITURES 1qc;_-7f. . ,• \ ;' '·· :· : •·. ·· . ... 13,000 4,668 25 17,693 33,121 17,693 15,428 192 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 13,000 4,343 200 17,543 15,090 32,633 15,620 200 100 15,920 16' 713 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0,..2_!_1c FUND #7 BOND & INTEREST -1962 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $2,680,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976177 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 197G/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 653,059,270 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 620,406,308 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0317 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RJ\ISE $ 62,040 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q7l1/75 1975/76 tXPENDITURES lSJ.5.--:Jr-. 1976-77 110,000 110,000 110,000 120,000 101,390 97,816 97,816 94,240 300 300 75 200 I 211, 690 208, 116 207,891 214,440 80,690 80,554 78,204 292,380 288,670 292,644 1·. k " I(: ::. '. 288,670 L 207,891 80,779 :>: 10,128 94,099 88,975 Ir. 90,907 ~( .. 1,800 2,000 2,000 k" 4,000 2,500 2,500 99,899 93,475 95,407 192,481 195,195 197,237 r ... ::c ":; .. ,.: ',, ' \: I': I· [.., - - ~ -- .. - - - - - .. ... - - . ,. - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~1~ FUND · #7 BOND & INTEREST -1970 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND RETIREMENT & INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AU11IORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $3,950,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 650,094,950 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 617,590,203 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0688 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 61,759 APPROVED BUDGET 1q7lif75 175,000 265,952 300 441,252 330,101 771,353 . 329,225 4,000 8,000 341,225 430,128 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 200,000 253,577 300 453,877 348,476 802,353 346,552 4,500 6,000 357,052 445,301 - . ••• I! ESTI MATEO ACTUAL XPENDITURES lc.J'l-7~. 200,000 253,577 125 453,702 ;. \ ;;. .... i.: _,, \ I• I• ' '· . 802,353 453,702 348,651 22,536 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 225,000 239,564 300 464,864 341,088 805,952 371, 187 4,500 . 5,000 380,687 425,265 COUNTY Sf\N IT f\ TI ON D 1 srn I CT NO. _1_ FUND #7 ACCW.I. CAPITAL OUTL\Y DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Treatment Plant Expansion Reserve for Facilities to comply with State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California Temporary Transfer to Faci~ities Revolving Fund District Facilities Improvements and Extensions Reserve Joint Works Equity Purchase Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Tax Collection Expense Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE ~unds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Federal and State Grants Sale of Capacity Rights Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2 *~Adjusted for authorized budget transfers BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 650,094,950 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5~ DELINQ. $ 617,590,203 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2208 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 61,759 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q71,175 1975/76 .XPENDITURES 1976-77 1qr;_-7f. 2,690,680 2,139,913* 1,428,941 1,843,296 . 1,080,000 2,646,000 2,646,000 531,000 983,000** 470,000 1,304,000 793,000 64 ,900*". 387,000 132,754 135,660 135,660 156,112 1,000 1,000 525 1,200 2,500 2,500 2,481 3,600 100** 1.000 5,230,934 5,973,073 2.037.607 6.342.208 ,., I.< ::r· 5,973,073 ,,. 2,037,607 3>935,466 ,. ,:·L 46,486 2,758,574 3,635,784 3,888,980 7,000 8,000 9,000 1,539,000 1,225,000 854,000 . 10, 236 18,895 19,000 47,000 160,000 140,000 160.000 4,474,810 5,027,679 4,977.980 756,124 945,394 1.364 .228 . - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - COUNTY SAN IT/\TI ON DI srnI CT NO, _7_ FUND #7 CO:-JSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees District Facilities Improvements and Extensions TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-·76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 650,094,950 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 617,590,203 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ -0- 0NE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 61,759 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MATED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q71,17r:, 1975/76 XPEND I TURES 10,J.5_-7f, 1976-77 300 300 125 300 327,791 350,445 -0-368,910 328,091 350,745 125 369,210 : : 350,745 :. 125 ' 350,620 ' ' .i. 5,590 318,091 338,745 356,210 10,000 12,000 13.000 328,091 350,745 369,210 -0--0--0- ' / ' '. ; ... '. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~1~ FUND #7 FACILITIES REVOLVING DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITIJRES Tustin Orange Trunk Sewer Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Reach 17 & 18 New Meters & Pumping Revision at College Pump Station Raitt Street Trunk Replace Pumps at Navy Way Station Michelson Sub-Trunk Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement Payments Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Uncollectable Accounts District Facilities Improvements and Extensions & Reimbursement Agreements Payable TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) To be Provided by Improvement District (OPA) Receivable from City of Tustin Receivable from City of Orange Receivable from City of Santa Ana BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 650,094,950 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% OELINQ. $ 617,590,203 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ -0- 0NE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 61,759 APPROVED BUDGET 1q7li/75 1,378,000 16,000 10,000 132,305 400 150,555 1,687,260 854,260 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 2,142,000 16,000 10,000 130,000 ESTIMATED ACTUAL ~XPEND I TURES lCJr.-7(-. 1,332,151 . . 43 ' ' h·· L .. 119,807 I? 400 I• 125 ,, '< 12 , .... [-' "" 143,396* 2,514 2,441,796 1,454,652 . • ~- ; ;.- 691,796 288,000 200,000 546,000 . i,441,796 1,454,652 987,144 968,884 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 389,000 672 ,000 25,000 40,000 10,000 150,000 10,000 400 500 2,056,360 3,353,260 18,260 672,000 309,000 209,000 401,000 Receivable from Costa Mesa San. Dist. 50,000 238,000 Temporary Transfer from ACO Fund Fees Interest Income & Miscellaneous TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Outstanding Master Plan Reimbursement Agreements as of 6-30-76 Jamboree Sub-Trunk $9,903 531,000 262,000 40,000 1,687,260 -0- 483,000 1,304,000 153,000 200,000 30,000 2,000 2,441,796 3,353,260 -0--0- - - - ... - .. .. .. .. - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY Sl\N IT /\Tl ON DI STIU CT NO ,-2.?lA, 1B & 7c FUND · #7 FIXED OBLIGATION DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENDITURES Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Requirements to Provide for Debt Obligation Payments TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 7S/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 1,006,216,680 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 955,905,848 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0009 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 9S,S90 APPROVED APPROVED ES.TI MATED RECOl:MEN DE D BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q71,175 1975176 XPENDITURES 1q7'i:-7f. 1976-77 so so 23 so . so so so lS,000 lS,000 13,000 lS,000 lS,100 lS,100 13,023 15,100 •· 15,100 13,023 ' 2,077 . 4,523 2,281 6,286 . 6,600 ·. so so so 2,331 6,336 6,650 12,769 8,764 8,450 1 .• - 7/29/76 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Through Total 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 Construction/Purchase of Reaches 17 672,000 & 18 of Tustin-Orange 400;000 272,000 Tustin-Orange, Fairhaven & Esplanade to Santiago Boulevard & Santiago Canyon Road, Contract 7-6-8 656,000 574,000 82,000 *Raitt Street Trunk 40,000 40,000 Tustin-Orange, Santiago Boulevard to Santiago Canyon Road, Contract 7-6~9 350,000 43,000 307,000 Michelson Sub-Trunk 150,000 150,000 South Irvine Lift Station 140,000 140,000 South Irvine Sub-Trunk 150,000 150,000 New Meters & Revise Ptunping -College Ptunp Station 25,000 25,000 Replace Pumps at Navy Way Ptunp Station 10,000 10,000 Miscellaneous Small Projects 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 15,000 2,568,000 617,000 1,089,000 497,000 75,000 215,000 75,000 *Oi'stri:ct No. 7 Share of District No. l Facili t:y ( ( I I I t I • ( I I I • ( I I I I ( • I 1 I I I I I I I I • I I I I ' ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FL~ FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 DESCRIPTION 76-77 77-78 78-79 79-80 80-81 CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL 1YEARS $ 5,502,000 $ 6,628,000 $ 7,191 ,000 $ 7,090,000 $ 6,946,000 REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.3485) 2, 164,ooo 2,206,000 2,233,000 2,309,000 2,367,000 Other Revenue Federal & State Participation 854,000 1,890,000 3,006,000 3,736,000 2,650,000 Fees 253,000 187,000 169,000 172,000 175,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 19,000 14i,OOO 5,000 463,000 476,000 Due From Other Agencies 1,834,000 Miscellaneous 252 2 000 288 2000 316 2000 310 2000 3041000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $10,878~000 $11,340,000 $12,920,000 $14,080,000 $12,918.000 EXPENDITURES District Construction $ 1,089,000 $ 497,000 $ 75,000 $ 215,000 $ 75,000 Share of Joint Works Constructf on & Equf ty 1,705,000 2,037,000 3,990,000 4,956,000 3,276,000 Bond Retirement & Interest 696,000 677,000 669,000 685,000 691 ,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury 24,000 24,000 25,000 Share of Joint Operating 324,ooo 481 ,000 566,000 669,000 1,207,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures 4362000 457,000 506,000 585 2 000 671 2 000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 4,250,000 $ 4,149,000 $ 5,830,000 $ 7,134,ooo $ 5,945,000 Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year $ 6,628,000 $ 7' 191 ,000 $ 7,090,000 $ 6,946,000 $ 6,973,000 Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Re~eipt of Tax Apportionments 2,158 2000 2,968,000 3,616,000 2 1 983 1 000 1 2 991 2000 Fund Balance or (Deficit) $ 4,470,000 $ 4,223,000 $ 3,474,000 $ 3,963,000 $ 4,982,000 One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise $ 65,009 $ 68,259 $ 71,673 $ 75,256 $ 79,019 - - - - -' ·- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANG-E COUNTY BUDGET RECQ~,~1\11ENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR - - - - - - ... - - COUNTY S A!\!IT,l'-"Y!'-"·J DI ~Tf-:!CT No. 11 ---·--... ---··--···-----· ------ BUDGET RECOMMt~NDATIONS 1 J76-77 FISCAL l'EAR DISTRICT F'ACIL STIES EXPANSION 8:. RESERVE ~.48 BUDGETED REQUIREMENT DOLLAR. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 7 ,537 ,606 . ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY F'UND $.6~ OPERATING FUND $.29 TAX REVENUE DOLLAR ' TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 1,445,974 CARRY-OVER &: RESERVE $. 61 SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR ' TOTAL AVAILABLE $ 7,537 ,606 • Rounded to neore~t COUNTY SANITATIO~J DISTRICT TR.END CHARTS . 72/73 "THROUGH 76/77 800 750 700 (/') 650 c:: 5 600 ..J 41 g 550 40 LI. 500 0 39 450 (/') 38 3 400 Cl) :J ' ... 37 ..J 350 z ~ L\J 36 300 u 35 250 34 200 33 72 73 74 75 6 . 73 74 75 76 n 32 F I S CAL YEAR 72 73 74 75 76 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION '73 74 75 76' 77 FI ·s C A I. YEAR .IAo BAii:: ( I I ( ( I { • I ' I NO. I 11 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 Cl) er 5.5 ct ..J ..J 5.0 0 0 4.5 . LL. 0 4.0 . ~ 3.5 .0 j 3.0 -~ 2.5 2.0 1. 5 1.0 . 72 73 CASH EXPENSE 73 7-1- 74 75 FI SC AL 75 76 16 n YE AR RAISED BY TAXES TOTAL BUDGET 8 EXPE~~DITURES ( I t I I f I - - - - - - - - ..... - - - COUNTY Sf\N IT ATI ON DISTRICT NO, _1_1 FUND #11 BOND & INTEREST -1951 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND REtIRDIENT AND I~'TEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $172,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 436,731,770 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5°& DELINQ. $ 414,895,182 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0037 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE Will RAISE $ 41,489 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMEt-.DED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q7t,175 1975/76 XPENDITURES 1q7c;-7~. 1976-77 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 4,735 4,450 4,450 4,150 200 200 25 200 ' 16,935 16,650 ' 16,475 16,350 14,300 14, 150 14,000 31,235 30,800 30,350 1. 1; ,,. f 30,800 ~ 16,475 ~ 14,325 !'.>. h 412 ,. 14,889 14,787 ' 14,737 150 100 150 200 200 100 15,239 15,087 14,987 15,996 15,713 15,363 i' , .. : ,. ,, COUNTY SJ\N IT A TI ON DI ST IH CT NO I _1 _1 FUND #11 BOND & INTEREST -1958 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOND REtIREMENT & INTEREST Principal on Bonds Interest on Bonds Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees TOTAL AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income and Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6-30-76 $800,000 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 Fl SCAL YEAR P:relim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 436,731,770 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% DELINQ. $ 414,895,182 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0166 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 41,489 APPROVED APPROVED EST I MJ\TED RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1q7li/75 1975/76 XPENDITURES 1C:7C:_-7(. 1976-77 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,250 28,250 28,250 26,250 300 300 125 250 80,550 78,550 78,375 76,500 52,600 51,000 49.501 133,150 129,550 126,001 L 129,550 ;:· 78,375 I 51,175 If 3,707 57,892 SS, 112 54,882 : 750 500 '.· 900 I. 2,000 1,200 1,200 60,642 56,812 56,982 72,508 72, 738 69,019 '·· i ;;. ,., - ... .... .. • - - ... - - - - - ... - - COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NO. 11 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim; 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 436, 731, 770 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5\ DELINQ. $ 414,895,182 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .3485 SUMMARY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 41,489 APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1974176 1975/76 1976177 REgUIREMENTS Operating Fund 839,210 941,798 929,092 Bond and Interest Fund -1951 31,235 30,800 30,350 Bond and Interest Fund -1958 133,150 129,550 126,001 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 5,183,632 5,884,653 6.452.163 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,187,227 6,986,801 7,537,606 FUNDS AVAILABLE JULY 1 Carry-Over (Cash & Investments) 3,470,978 4,295,172 5,065,333 Other Revenue and Transfers 1,586,068 1,481,823 1,026,299 ·TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,057,046 5,776,995 6,091,632 DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 1,130,181 1,209,806 1,445,974 TAX RATE Actual Actual ------ Operating Fund .1380 .1036 .0621 Bond and Interest Fund -1951 .0052 .0045 .0037 Bond and Interest Fund -1958 .0227 .0212 .0166 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund .1902 .2246 .2661 TOTAL TAX RATE .3561 . 3539 .3485 *During 1968-69, a partial settlement allowed for the release of taxes impounded pending outcome of lawsuits re oil fields valuations during the fiscal years 1964-65 through 1966-67, in the amount of $46,676 plus earned interest of $12,050. Pending suits or protests require continuation of the tax impound which amounts to $267,982 as of June 30, 1976. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.~1~1 FUND #11 OPERATH\G DESCRIPTION.OR ACCOUNT TITLE OPERATING Directors' Fees Contractual Services Share of Joint Operating Trunk Maintenance Manho~e Repairs Pump Station Maintenance Permit & Ind. Waste Adm.· Inter-Dist. Sewer Use Chg. Tax Collection Expense Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Treasurer's Banking Fee Utilities Professional Services Printing and Publication Membership Travel & Meetings -Directors' Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL OPERATING NON-OPERATING Expenses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL NON-OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Aliowance for Accruals, Other Income & Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INVEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Fees Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Adjusted for authorized budget transfers BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 436,731,770 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR 5% OELINQ. $ 414,895,182 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .0621 ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 41,489 APPROVED BUDGET 1C!74/75 2,850 304,280 32,000 40,000 40,000 16,000 41,000* 1,300 800 27,000* 2,500 1,000 380 100 509,210 3,000 3,000 512,210 75,000* 252,000 839' 210 368,531 3,000 31,000 402,531 436,679 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 2,900 362,878 32,000 70,000 40,000 18,000 1,200 800 35,000 2,500 3,000 420 1. 100 ; 568,798 3,000 3,000 ESTIMATED ACTUAL XPENOITURES 1~7c;-7f. 2,500 250,890 18,344 13,012 26,448 10,449 965 400 30,861 266 349 72 354,566 5 71 '79 8 .___3_5_4 .:-' 5_6_6_. 85,000 285,000 941,798 552,373 2,700 30,000 585,073 356' 725 941,798 354,566 587,232 40, 772 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 3,300 346,242 32,000 75,000 40,000 18,000 800 1.000 500 38,000 2,500 1,500 450 300 500 560,092 3,000 3,000 563,092 85,000 281,000 929,092 628,004 4,400 4,000 35,000 671,404 257,688 - ... .. ... • .. - - - ... -- - - - ... - - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DI~TRICT N0.~11~ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR Prelim: 7-29-76 1976/77 ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION $ 436,731,770 1976/77 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FOR St DELINQ. $ 414,895,182 1976/77 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $ .2661 FUND .#11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY ONE CENT IN TAX RATE WILL RAISE $ 41,489 DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES Treatment Plant Expansion Reserve for Facilities to comply with State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California Coast Highway Trunk, Reaches 2 & 3 Contract 11-12 Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension Remodel Slater Avenue Pump Sta. & Wet Well Remodel Newland-Hamilton Pump Sta. & Rehabilitate Flow Metering Equipment Ocean Avenue Trunk Realignment Bushard Trunk Connectors District Facilities Improvements and Extensions Reserve Treasurer's Investment Adm. Fees Tax Collection Expense Uncollectable Accounts TOTAL REQUIREMENTS LESS: CASH CARRY-OVER & REVENUE Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 75/76 Actual Expenditures 75/76 Allowance for Accruals, Other Income & Transfers CARRY-OVER (CASH & INYEST'S) Delinquent Taxes Due from CSD #3 (Nichols St. Sewer) Federal and State Grants Joint Works Equity Sale Sale of Capacity Rights Interest & Misc. Receipts TOTAL CASH & REVENUE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES *Project scheduling adjusted for accelerated construction of primary facilities at Plant 2 **Adjusted for authorized budget transfers APPROVED BUDGET 1CJ74/75 APPROVED BUDGET 1975/76 EST I Ml\TED .ACTUAL "XPEND I TURES 1c7r,-U. 2,379,832 1,840,553* 1,136,709 1,300,000 75,000 88,000 40,000 35,000 . 1,263,000 1,000 1,800 5,183,632 3,029,666 6,000 1,361,000 1,044 10,924 170,000 4,578,634 604,998 1,300,000 1,252,000 . ; :: 82,000 .. 56,000 ·:· .\ ··. 35,000 :: ,, r 1, 315, 900**'. 1,000 I ,. 2,100 I( ,, I>,· 100**1 5,884,653 '.'_._, ; ,., '" :\ ,.,,. >\ ,. 3,6]2,900 4,000 132,000 I: 1,051,000 ~: 45,220 67,403 147,500 5,120,023 764,630 20,709 30 525 2,062 10 1,160,045 5,884,653 1.,160,045 4,724,608 356,898 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 1,542,663 1,300,000 2,201,000 50,000 15,000 1,339,000 1,100 2,900 500 6,452,163 4, 367, 710 9,000 714 ,000 27,549 70,000 160,000 5,348,259 1,103,904 7/29/76 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 REVISED SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Total 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 1981-87 Bushard Trunk Connections 15,000 15,000 Ocean Avenue Trunk Realignment (at Huntington Street) .SO, 000 50,000 Coast Highway Trunk. Reaches 1 & 2 2,201,000 625,000 1,576,000 Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 3 761,000 761,000 Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 4 501,000 501,000 Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 5 1,000,000 1,000,000 Newland Street Interceptor 286,000 286,000 Edwards Trunk, Reach 1 639,000 639,000 Goldenwest Interceptor Sewer 309,000 309,000 Miscellaneous Small Projects 400,000 100,000 752000 75!000 75,000 752000 Sub~Total 6,162,000 790,000 1,937,000 836,000 576,000 2,023,000 Coast Highway Trunk, Reach 6 1,489,000 1,489,000 Edwards Trunk, Reach 2 & 3 831,000 831,000 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 55,000 55,000 Warner Avenue Sewer Purchase 250,000 250,000 McFadden Avenue Relief Sewer 124~000 124,000 Edinger Avenue Interceptor 100,000 100,000 Heil Avenue Relief Sewer 156,000 156,000 Graham Street Sewer Purchase 104,000 104,000 Springdale Trunk Sewer 670,000 670,000 Grand Total 9,941~000 790,000 1,937,000 836,000 576,000 2,023,000 3,779,000 I ' ( . ( I I t • ( t I I I I I • • I • .. I I I I I I I ' DESCRIPTION CARRY-OVER FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS REVENUE Tax Revenue (at current tax rate of $.3485) Other Revenue Federal & State Participation Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Miscellaneous TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE EXPENDITURES District Construction Share of Joint Works Construction Bond Retirement & Interest ' I I I I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FL~ FISCAL YEARS 1976-77 THROUGH 1980-81 76-77 $ 5,065,000 1,446,000 714,000 4,000 70,000 238,000 $ 7,537,000 $ 790,000 1,427 ,000 92,000 77-78 $ 4,660,000 1. 516. 000 1 ,582,000 379,000 120,000 188,000 $ 8,445,000 $ 1 ,937,000 1 ,705,000 90,000 Refunds of Capital Cost Recovery to Federal Treasury Share of Joint Operating 346,000 222,000 514,000 185,000 District Operating & Other Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Carry-Over Balance to Following Fiscal Year Funds Necessary to Meet Commitments Prior to Receipt of Tax Apportionments Fund Balance or (Deficit) One Cent on Tax Rate Will Raise $ 2,877,000 $ 4,431 ,000 $ 4,660,000 $ 4,014,000 2,232,000 2,583,000 s 2,428,ooa $ 1 ,lt31 ,000 $ 41 ,489 $ 43,563 I I 78-79 $ 4,014,000 1,586,000 2,516,000 379,000 6,000 149,000 $ 8,650,000 $ 836,000 3,339,000 88,ooo 24,ooo 605,000 214,000 $ 5, 106,000 $ 3,544,ooo 2,928,000 $ 616,000 s 45,742 I 79-80_ $ 3 ,544 ,000 1,659,000 3,126,000 379,000 389,000 121 ,000 $ 9,218,000 I $ 576,000 4,148,000 86,000 25,000 715,000 247 ,000 . $ 5 '797 ,000 $ 3 ,421 ,000 3,208,000 $ 213 ,000 $ 48,029 ( 80-81 $3,421 ,000 1,736,000 2,217,000 379,000 400,000 114,000 $ 8,267 ,000 $ 2,023,000 2,742,000 811,000 24,000 1 ,209,000 280,000 $ 6,362,000 $ 1,905,000 2,252,000 $ (347 ,000) $ 50,430 I THE FOLLOWING JOINT OPERATING FUND AND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND BUDGETS WERE ADOPTED BY THE BOARDS IN JUNE AND EACH DISTRICTS' RESPECTIVE SHARE HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO ITS BUDGET ON THE PRECEDING PAGES • - - - - - - - - - ... - - Hay 27, 1976 MEMORANDUM TO: Executive Committee and Joint Boards FROM: J. Wayne Sylvester, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 1976-77 Budget Transmittal for: Joint Operating Fund including Personnel Recommendations and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71'4) 5•0-2910 (71'4) 962-2:411 Transmitted herewith are the staff's personnel recommendations and proposed budgets for the Joint Operating Fund (JO) and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) for the 1976-77 fiscal year. JO & CORF Budgets Consideration of the Joint Districts' budgetary requirements is the first step in the annual budget process. The JO budget funds the operation and maintenance of the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. Administrative activities and R & D are also included in the Joint Operating Fund. The CORF budget accounts for construction funding of the joint works facilities at the treatment plant sites. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets do not, as such, have a tax rate levied. Following action by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting, the approved JO and CORF requirements will be incorporated into the respective operating and accumulated capital outlay fund budgets of the individual Districts. Each District's Board will then separately consider its 1976-77 budget (which includes the share of JO and CORF) at the August meeting of the Boards. Following adoption of the Districts' budget requiremer.ts, the Board of Supervisors will set the tax rates during the last week in August. Uniform System of Accounts The Joint Operating account classification conforms to the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the State Controller. The Districts have expanded the Uniform System considerably to produc~ additional information deemed desirable for administering and control ling the financial activities. An integral part of the system is a comprehensive cost accounting program that maintains detailed records of maintenance and operational expenditures and assists the staff in effectively control] ing costs. The staff has recommended Uniform System revisions to the State Controller which would make it more adaptable, result in considerable accounting cost savings, and also provide for new revenue program requirements. Carry-over Efforts this year wil 1 result in a substantial carry-over of unexpended Joint Operating b~dget funds from the 1975-76 fiscal year which will be available to apply against 1976-77 budget requirements. For the past several years the General Manager has deferred hiring of new employees to fill authorized positions in several depart- ments where certain activities and projects could be delayed. This has resulted in a substantial payroll savings due to the unfilled positions. However, it is expected that full employment of authorized positions will be necessary in. 1976-77 in order to meet departmental responsibilities. Other major sources of carry-over will be the chemical coagulants budget item; the materials, supplies, and outside services allocation; and the utilities budget which experienced a stabilization of costs during the year. By changing the mode of our operation, we have been able to meet currently-enforced discharge regulations without extensive chemical addition. Implementation of EDP, which is presently com~lete except for the inventory application and accounts receivable which will be added this year to accommodate billing for industrial surcharges under the new source control ordinance, will assist us in continuing the tightest possible reigns on controllable expendit~res. It should be pointed out that although the carry-over is reflected in the Joint Operating budget documents (primarily for Directors' information), the funds are actually held in the Operating Fund of each individual District and applied to the following year's bud9et requirements for the respective Districts. This has the effect of reducing the net tax levy of each District. Throughout the year, funds are transferred to JO only as needed to meet expenditures as they are incurred. Monies, while on deposit in the individual Districts' accounts, are invested in short-term government securities from which the D'.stricts realize a substantial interest income annually. Similar procedures are followed with respect to funding of CORF from the individual Districts' Accumu- lated Capital Outlay Funds. Memo to Executive ColTlllittee & Joint Boards Hay 27, 1976 Page Two Joint Works Tax Levy Increases Attributed to New Federal and State Regulations and Inflationary Trends The increase in budget requirements for the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund are attributed, to a large extent, to new federal and state regulations. In order to meet provisions of the 1972 Amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act, and regulations promulgated pursuant to said Act by the Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State (SWRCB) and Regional (RWQCB) Water Quality Control Boards, the Districts have undertaken a plant expansion program for advanced treatment facilities that will require an expenditure of $205 mil lion over a seven-year period. A $32 million project for the first increment of this work, a 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1, will be completed during the latter part of 1976-77. The capital cost to meet the State Water Resources Control Board's California Ocean Plan would be considerably less ($113 million); however, EPA has interpreted the federal law as mandating secondary treatment for all municipal dischargers. There is no scientific evidence to support this requirement for deep water ocean dischargers and our Directors and staff have been working with Congressional representa- tives and EPA officials in an attempt to obtain a change in the regulations to provide a fiscally responsible interpretation which is consistent with environmental goals. Directors are aware of the cooperative effort between our Districts and the NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory of Cal Tech in developing the activated carbon treatment process (ACTS) which appears to offer a technological breakthrough in the treatment of wastewater and sludge. The 1 MGD pilot plant has been completed and the process is presently undergoing evaluation at the site. If successful, this process could substantially reduce the cost of secondary treatment construction and operation. In June, 1974, EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board jointly issued an NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit also required by the Act. The proposed permit regulations require extensive chemical treatment and greatly extend our monitoring activities. The staff has previously reported that discussions are continuing with the RWQCB regarding requirements contained in our permit which appear to extend beyond the intent of the 1972 Act. If requirements are not redu~ed, it will be necessary to add new personnel in the Laboratory Division and provide for additional funding. The passage of HR 9560, which, among other things, would amend the law relative to the secondary treatment matter and the issue of allowing ad valorem taxes for operation and maintenance cost funding, is somewhat in doubt at this point. The Districts must, therefore, proceed with construction of full secondary treatment and implementation of a ''revenue progra~' which will add user charges as a source of revenue to fund M & O costs and capital replacement to comply with PL 92-500 and the construction grant regulations. Over and above the capital cost, secondary treatment will almost triple our on-going operating costs. Administration of 2 user charge program will also increase our overhead costs substantially. The new facilities, expanded processes, and changed regulations have a significant influence on personnel and materials, supplies and services acquisitions, and therefore, our budgetary requirements. Directors are also well aware of current inflationary trends and rising labor costs recognized nationwide (to which comments are more specifically addressed in the JO budget documents) that are also reflected in the enclosed budget recommen- dations.· We have experienced not only rising costs on a daily basis, but considerable difficulty in obtaining delivery of needed parts and supplies although it has stabilized somewhat during the past several months. The impact of the above on the joint works requirements will be a $814,931 (15%) increase in the Joint Operating· budget over last year. However, this will be offset by increased revenues from the industrial surcharge program which commences July 1st and the net result is actually a decrease of net JO requirements of $35,069 (1%). The net amount to be raised by taxes for the two funds is up $4,309,855, or 66% more than last year's total. The $4.7 mill ion increase in the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund will have to be sustained for several years to fund re~uired secondary treatment facilities. As a result, it may require a tax rate increase in several Districts to raise sufficient funds to meet the construction program. The General Counsel has determined that tax rates can be increased over those allowed by SB 90 because the programs are mandated by federal and state regulations. The amount of any increases will not be known until individual District budgets are prepared in July. As noted above, while the staff has been able to maintain treatment and disposal costs considerably below budgetary allocations, we anticipate that costs will escalate in the future to meet the demands placed on our operational activities; and as new and expanded processes to improve the quality of the treated effluent phase into operation. Summarized below are comparative figures for total joint requirements. It is anticipated that the equivalent combined tax rate required for all Districts to finance the joint works operations and plant expansion will increase approximately 8 cents in 1976-77. Equivalent Total Reguirements Available Fundin9 Raised by Taxes Tax Rate 1975-76 1976-77 1975-76 1976-77 1975-76 1976-77 1975-76 1976-77 JO. $ 5,332,326 $ 6, 147,257 $ 1,268, 184 $ 2,473,260 $4,064,142 $ 3,673,997 $ .0839 $ .0723 CORF 26 2 033,000 21!944,000 23!533,000 14,744 2 000 2,500,000 7 2 200,000 .0516 . 1416 $31 ,365,326 $28,091,257 $24,801,184 $17,217,260 $6,564,142 $10,873,997 ~ • 1355 $ .2139 y - ,, - - - ... ... - ... - -'-' - - ... -. - - - - . · COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND 1976 -77 FISCAL YEAR 'r L ( [ ( ( Salaries, Wages & Benefits LESS Chargebacks to CORF & Dlsts. Net Salaries, Wages & Be~efits Chargeable to JO Materials, Supplies & Outside Services Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants Research & Monitoring Insurance (Net) Uti 1 ities Total Joint Operating Expenses Revenue and Offsets Net Joint Operating Transfer to CORF TOTAL l ( l l ( I I l ( [ l l Schedule JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY COMPARISON OF. BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPEND I TURES & EST I MATED CARRY-OVER Budget 1975176 $3,814,826 1,100,000 $2,714,826 811,000 507,000 154,500 45 ,000 870,000 $5,102,326 250,000 $4,852,326 230,000 $5,082,326 Recommended Increase Budget or 1976/77 (Decrease) $4,253,757 $438,931 950,000 (150,000) $3,303,757 $588,931 900,000 89,000 507,000 -o- 248,500 94,000 53,000 8,000 870,000 -o- $5,882,257 $779,931 1, 100,000 850,000 $4,782,257 $(70,069) 35,000 $5,047,257 $ (35 '069) Expenditures Estimated Increase 1974/75 Expenditures or 1975/76 (Decrease) $2,818 ,734 $3,317,519 $498 ,785 951,436 906,113 · (45,323) $1,867,298 $2,411,406 $544,108 579 ,763 641 ,425 61,662 168,'004 i94,263 26,259 111,869 154,834 42,965 37,669 44,822 7,153 494,.137 558,695 64 ,558 $3,258,740 $4,005,445 $746,705 243,950 296,379 52,429 · $3,014,790 $3,709,066 $694,276 21,646 -o-(21 ,646) $3,036 ,436 $3,709,066 $672,630 Est'd Carry-Over to Fisaal Vear l 976/77 $ 497,307 193,887 $ 303,420 169,575 312,737 (334) 178 311. 305 $1,096,881 (46,379) $1,143,260 230,000 $1,373,260 .l SCHEDUL E II BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS JOINT OPERATING FUND Fi scal Year 1976177 ALLOCAT ION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TAX LEVY GALLONAGE FLOWS FUNDING 1975/76 COMPARISON 1975/76 Es t I mated Esti mated Amount to District Amount Raised Di s trict Flow s Estimate d 1976/77 % Dis t rict Esti mated be Raised Contribution by Ta xes No. (Pa s t Ye ar) Increa se Fl ows of Total Co nt r i bu t ion Carryo ve r by Taxes 7,226 MG 144 MG 7,370 MG 10.95% $ 552,675 $ 150,372 $ 402,303 $ 590,566 $ 468,059 2 20,338 1,016 21,354 31. 74 1 ,601 ,999 435.873 1, 166, 126 1, 523. 173 1,221,813 3 21,259 956 22,215 33 .01 1,666 ,09 9 453,313 1,212,786 1,664,462 1,343,273 5 3,626 72 3,698 5.5p 277,599 75,529 20 2 ,070 297,824 244,812 6 3,679 36 3,715 5.52 278,609 75,804 202,805 302,907 242,026 .7 4, 112 205 4,317 6.42 324 ,034 88, 163 235,871 340,516 262,360 11 4,525 90 4,615 6.86 346 ,242 94,206 252,036 362,878 28 1,799 TOTALS 64,765 MG 2,519 MG 67,284 MG lG0.00 % $5,0 47,257 $1,373,260 $3,673,997 $5,082,326 $4,064,142 [ ( c -JOHIT WOR KS OPERATIN G BUD GET RECOMMENDATIONS 197 6-77 FISCA L YEAR STRIC T P, FUND : Joint Operating m:PAR TMENT: CLASS I FI CATION: Sunvnary ,..,. DESCR I PTION OR ACC OUNT TITLE ' LARI ES, WAGE S & BENE F ITS -- Sa l a r ie s & Wages - -Employ ee Be ne fits : Re ti remen t (PERS) - -Wo r kmen 's Compe nsat i on -Group Medical I nsurance Uni fo r m Renta l TOTAL PAYRO LL SS: Cha r gebacks to Joint Works Capita l Out lay and Indiv i d ual Di s t r i cts -..... - - NET J O PAYRO LL APPROVED BUDGE T 1975-76 ACTU AL EXPENDIT UR ES 1975 -76 (4th qt r es t d ) 3 ,205 ,66 5 2 ,841,20 8 . 327 ,610 273,788 70,676 57,667 178,396 121 ,832 32 ,479 23,02 4 3 ,8 14,826 3,3 17,519 1,100,000 906, 113 2,7 14,826 2 '41 1'406 - RECOM MEN DED BUD GET 197 6 -77 3 ,655 ,431 DATE: SCHEDU LE: PAGE NO , Ma y 27 , 197 6 111 1 of 4 REMA RKS Sc hedu l e "A" of Personnel Recomme ndations s ufllTl a rizes projected gross sa l aries and wag es assum i ng full employment of recom - me nd e d positions. Current agreements with emp l oyee groups do not expire until November, 1977 . Adjustmen t s providad for in said agreements have been incorp- orated into the projections i nciuding cos t of l i v i ng adjustments based on the BLS c on s ume r price index. Should the i nd ex i ncrease more rapidly tha n esti - ma t e d, it may be necessa r y to a l l ocate fund s fr om the unappropriated reserve accoun t s o f the ind i vidua l Di stric t s if ac cumu lated · payroll savi ngs a re inade- qu a te . 274 ,167 Reflects "depoo l ed" r ate which decreased emp l oyer contr i bution from 12.5% to 7.96% effective 7/1/76 . Does not allow fo r possible transfer to the Orange County Employees Retirement System wh i ch i s st i ll under conside r ation . 96,61 1 191 ,478 36 ,070 4,253 ,757 950 ,000 Recent changes have resulted in a p r emium rate increase of app r oximately 20%. HMO p l an premium inc r eased t h i s year and pu rs uan t to t he two-year ag r eement with emp l oyee groups, the added cost was borne by the Di st r icts. Charged back to CORF through cost accounting system for work on treat - ment plants' capital expansion; and to i nd i vidual Districts for work on Di stricts ' co ll ection facil i ties cap i ta l expansion, and maintenance and r epair of said system . Also ref lects indust r ial waste divis i on charges to r espective Dist ri cts . 3,303 ,757 Represents balance of payrol l expenses chargeab l e to operat i on and maintenance of joint treatment and disposa l works; and administrative and research activi - t i es. JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT P. FUND: Joint Operating DATE: May 27, 1976 111 DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: Summary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE _ MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES Gasoline, Oil & Fuel Insurance Office Expen s e Operating Supp li es: Chlo rine & Odor Co n tro l Chemica l s Ch emica l Coag ul ants APPR OV ED BUDGET 1975-76 60,000 45 ,000 25,000 187 ,000 320 ,000 AC TUA L EXP END ITU RES 1975-76 (4th qtr estd) 44,544 44,822 21 ,806 121, 124 73,139 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 SCHEDULE: PAGE NO. 2 of 4 REMARKS 60,000 For both fixed and mobile equipment. Gross expense indicated with motor poo ' chargebacks r eflected und e r revenue. Budg et allocation reflects increa sed requireme nts for diesel-driven equipmen t being used for so lids handling, and power generation during scheduled shut· downs. 53,000 For PL & PD, fire & extended coverage, boiler & machinery , em ployee fidelity bo nd and tra ve l coverage. Last year ti Boards were advis ed of substantial Ii.I insurance premium increa s es becau se of the increasing nu mber o f claims fil e d against the Distri c t s, and the grow ing reluctance of insurance compa nies with.._ r espect to un de rwriting e nvri onmenta ll y - related activiti es , whi c h is reflected 30,000 in their increased rat e s tructures. CASA ha s und e rtaken a st ud y of t he feasibility of a group li a bi lity po li cy at r e duce d r ates for membe r agenc i es which s hould be comp l e t ed during t he fir s t ha lf of 1976-77. In c lud es supplies & forms for a ll depa rt- ments whi c h are increas ing to meet r eporting and internal contro l req uir e · me nts. 187,000 Budget allocation i s p rimaril y for o do r contro l at treatment pl an t s i te s . ~ 320,000 Annual budget for thi s item pr io r to 1971-72 was $355 ,000. New Oc ean Outfal' No. 2 was placed into se rvice i n 19 71 and has essentially e liminated ne e d fo r effluent chlorination. Howe ver, State & Federa l reg u lato ry agencies have pro- po sed new and conf li ct ing r egu lati ons which might requ i re r esump tion o f ._, chlorination. In t hat event i t may be ne cessary to a ll ocate f und s f rom the un app r o pri ated r ese rve o f the individu\ Di stricts. By c hang ing the mode o f our op e r a ti o n , we have been a bl e t o meet c urr e ntl y-e n forr 0 ~ di scharge r egu l a tions without che mi ca l add iti on s. How eve r, NP DES permi t re- quireme nts ado p ted by EPA and the R~' ' will r equire extens i ve chemical tre I~. As r eporte d in the personn e l r ecommend< tion s , we a r e continuing d i sc us s i ons wi 1 the Reg ion a l Boa rd in t hi s r ega rd. l f-....i un succe s sf ul, t he tota l a ll ocat ion will be necessa ry. JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR '\ STRICT P. FUND: Joint Operating . :PARTMENT: C'tASSIFICATION: Su1m1ary ;...J DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE icollectable Accounts ......, Utilities - - _:her Exp e nses -<penses Applicable to Prior Years TOTAL MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES TOTAL JO REQUIREMENTS ~SS: Revenu es NET JO REQUIREMENTS "'fransfer to CORF - GRAND TOTAL APPROVED BUDGET 1975-76 1,000 870,000 16,000 22,000 2,387,500 5,102,326 250,000 4,852,326 230,000 5,082,326 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1975-76 (4th qtr estd) 20 558,695 19,062 14,464 1,594,039 4,005,445 296,379 3,709,066 3,709,066 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 1,000 870,000 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO, May 27, 1976 l l 1 4 of 4 REMARKS Major item is purchased electrical power. Increasing costs plus demand from full- scale operation o f s ludge dewatering equipment, and placing of additional new equipment on the line, serve to signif i - cantly increase energy demand. Also, the 1000 HP electric booster pumps have to be ''on-1 ine'' more hours to meet peak- ing requirements until additional gas- driven pump installations are completed this year. Does provide limited funds to fire-up Plant No . 1 46 MGD activated sludge facilities scheduled for comple- tion during the latter part of the fiscal year. 22,000 Major item is fre ight in and out and reflects increases in rates due to petroleum costs. 22,000 Account required by Uniform Accounting System. 2,578,500 5,882,257 1,100,000 Anticipated revenue s should increase sig- nificantly as a result of surcharges impos ed by new source control o rdinance. Esti ma ted budget amount also includes grant revenue offset for JPL-AC TS eval- uation work. Balance is for sa l es of miscellaneous sewage treatment process by-products, equipment & sampling chargebacks to individual Districts and miscellaneous items. 4 ,782 ,257 265,000 5,047,257 Provides for payment to Capital Outlay Revo l ving Fund for spare parts acquired under Contract Pl-16 and J-6-1 at con- siderab l e savings ove r what they could be purchased for separate l y. Par ts will be placed in ware ho use inventory for future re pairs and repla cements. JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR - DISTRICT & FUND: Joint Operating DEPARTMENT: CLASSIFICATION: SullYllary DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases -Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training APPROVED ACTUAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1975-76 1975-76 (4th qtr estd) 127,000 73,914 88,ooo 76,002 74,000 36,914 30,000 28,914 26,000 17,499 325,000 295,299 154,500 154,834 17,000 12,987 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 1976-77 127,000 108,000 113,000 DATE: SCHEDULE: PAGE NO, May 27, 1976 111 3 of 4 REMARKS • - - Supplies required to operate and maintai existing and expanding facilities and .. laboratory work. Actual expense down this year; however, recommended alloca--- tion reflects anticipated requirements. Includes grit disposal, trash disposal, word processing and EDP. Includes General Counsel retainer & lega services, audit by CPA.and odor consultl!i"' ant. Funds also provided for consulting services for development of "revenue program11 required by the SWRCB & EPA pursuant to 1972 Amendments to the Watei.- Pol 1 ution Control Act. Also included are funds to update EDP master plan. 36,000 Budget increased to reflect both increas._ ing prices and continuing demand by public for information on Districts• activities. Staff continuing to utiliz for reporting and analysis for maximum effectiveness. Reproduction policies .. have been revised to minimize costs. 22,000 Primarily for heavy equipment required 342,000 intermittently for major facilities ._ repairs. This item is of a highly contingent natu and must allow for unexpected major equipment failures and maintenance of .. new facilities that are continually being placed into service as plant constructi projects are completed. Unprecedented increases in the cost of parts & suppli~, as much as 120%, coupled with several planned repairs to major equipment, increase the recommended budget alloca- tion for this item. 248,500 Includes Districts• contribution to So. Calif. Coastal Research Project being conducted under joint powers agreement, and required ocean monitoring. Also .. provides for considerably increased effort in operational research and eval uation, including the JPL-ACTS process, to develop optimum operating parameters.., 17,000 Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies require increased .,.. Board member and staff travel. Dist· t:s a 1 so continue to emphasize ongoing t~1- i ng of employees as operation of facili ties becomes more technical and complex - - -. - """" . - ·· ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT·Y BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION 1976 -77 FISCAL YEAR • ._ J ( ( r l ( l l ( [ CAP ITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARATIVE DATA FOR JOINT WORKS EXPANSION Fiscal Year 1976-77 1976-77 Requirements Equity Cash Estimated Transfer From Federal State mounts 0 e District Percent Requirements Carry-Over Joint Operating Participation Raised by Taxes 9.25 $ 2,029,820 $ 399,323 $ 24,513 $ 939,985 $ 665,999 2 29. 77 6,532,729 1,285, 171 78,891 3,025,227 2,143,440 3 32.97 7,234,937 1,423,315 87,371 3,350,411 2,373,840 5 6. 76 1,483,414 291,829 17,914 686,951 486, 720 6 5.82 1,277' 141 251,249 15,423 591 ,428 419,041 7 8.40 1,843,296 362,628 22,260 853,608 604,800 11 7.03 1,542,663 303,485 18,628 ,714,390 506,160 TOTALS 100.00 $21,944,ooo $4 ,31 7 ,000 $265,000 $10,162,000 $7,200,000 ( { Schedule A ·Page 1 5/27/76 1975-76 Comparative Amount Cash Amount Raised Requirements By Taxes $ 2,475 ,738 $ 237.750 7,765,644 745,750 8,559,650 822,000 1,723,385 165,500 1,528,137 146,750 2, 139,913 205,500 1,840 ,533 176,750 $26,033,000 $2 ,500,000 ( CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CON STRUC TION REQUIREMENTS 1976-77 FI SCAL YEAR GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS I . 46-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Plant at Plant No . 1 (Job No. Pl-16) 2. 75-MGD of Improved T reatment at Plant No . 2 a. Eng inee r ing b. Equipm ent Purchase c . Site Deve l opment d . Pu mp Stat i on e. Electrical Facilities f. Maj or Plan t Fac ili ties Le ss: Deferred 1977-78, 78-79 Budg et Allocations 3. Facilities Pian & JPL-ACTS Evaluation 4. 50-MGD of Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (2nd phase -engineering only) 5. Ga s Storage Facilities at Plants 1 and 2 6. Gas Mixing for Di gesters at Plants 1 and 2 7. Additional Centrifuge at Plar.t No. 2 SUB-TOTAL GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS NON-GRANT FUNDED PROJEC TS New & Re bud ge t ed Ma jo r Pro j ects I. Additional Pumping Fa c ilit i es (Job J -6-1) 2 . Ga s Engin es with ge a r drives a t Ro thro ck Outfa ll Bo os t e r Sta ti o n 3. Additional Warehousing Facilities (including s helving) 4. Foul Air Scrubbe r @ Pl a nt 2 (Job PW-05 0 ) 5. Add i tions a nd Remo deling of Administrat i on- Engineering Building at Plant No . 1 New & Re bud geted Mi nor Proj e cts 1. Recl ama tion Pl a nt No . 2. Treatme nt Plant No. 2 3. Equip me nt Special Proj ec t s 1. Solids T r e a tm e nt $ 3,000,000 8,000,000 3 ,000 ,000 2,000,000 5,500 ,000 43,000,000 $64,500,000 57,000,000 $ 1,400,000 550,000 150,000 150,000 300,000 $ 500,000 523,500 453 1200 $5,800,000 7,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 400,000 200 ,000 350 ,000 $2,550,000 1,476,700 Schedule B Page 2 5/27/76 $16,750,000 • r, - - - - - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ]. 8. 9. 1 o. 11. 12. 13. CAP ITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND Schedule C Page 3 NEW & REBUDGETED MINOR PROJECTS -P.ECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 Fiscal Year 1976-77 Replace District flow recorders in Control Center Relocate Moore encoder -Control Center Construct protective building over plant water and chlorine tanks Laboratory, Resources Management Center, operator lunch room improvements, and vacated warehouse fac.i 1 it ies including sa 1 vage yard New scum pump for basins 3 & 4 Automatic gate operators at diversion structure New wel 1 at main entrance (P\~-049) Automatic samplers Remodel Digester No. 6 cover Warehouse and Pl-16 sewer Miscellaneous paving Landscaping improvements Miscellaneous smal 1 projects $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 150,000 12,500 45,000 45,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 50,000 25,000 117, 500 $500,000 CAP ITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND NEW & REBUDGETED MINOR PROJECTS -TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 Fiscal Year )976-77 1. Additional supervisory controls 2. Remodel incinerator 3. Remodel air compressor 4. Abandon effluent chlorination station 5. Remodel digester "3" cover 6. Security gate operator 7. Remodel restroom facil itie> 8. Devise circulation pumps for· digester feed 9. 11 B11 clarifier chains 10. Surge tower extension (J-9-2) 11. Automatic samplers 12. 42 11 magnetic meter for Miller-Holder Trunk 13. Sludge pumps 14. Miscellaneous paving 15. Landscaping improvements 16. Miscellaneous small projects Schedule D Page 4 $ 20,000 6,000 41 • 000 25,000 20,000 5,000 10,000 16,500 20,000 25,000 10,000 75,000 75,000 25,000 50,000 100,000 $523,500 ( [ l [ [ ( { l Schedul e .E 5/2 7/76 Page 5 CAP ITAL OU TL AY REVOLVING FUND EQUIPMEN T REQU IR EMENTS 1976-77 F iscal Year Coll . La b & Egui2ment Total Admln. P i t . Mtce . Fae. ~ El ect . ~ Res . ~ Trucks & Vehicles $ 57,240 • $ 46,110 $1 1, 13 0 Other Mobile Equipment 83 ,740 $ 4,770 78,970 Machine Equipm ent & Tools 54,050 $3,223 3,763 41,674 $ 5 ,390 Co mm unication Equipme nt 6,678 2, 120 4,558 I I nst r umentation & Testing Equipment 94 ,663 9,540 7, 171 $8,480 $45,739 23,733 Office Equipm ent & Furni ture 63,740 $ 31 ,550 1 ,344 42 4 7,95 0 22,472 Other Eq uipment 93,089 82,425 4,357 4,957 926 424 Tota l s $453,200 $113 ,975 $7 ,580 $15,610 $178,564 $17 ' 119 $9 ,328 $53,689 $5 7,335 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FU ND PRELIMINARY CASH FL OW PROJ ECTIO NS F I SCAL YEARS 197 6-77 THRO UGH 1981 -82 Estimated Exp e nd ed Proj e ct Th rough Cost 6-30-76 1976-77 1977 -78 1978-79 1979-80 1980 -8 1 1981-82 'Carryover from Prev ious Year $ 4,317 ,000 $ 1 ,644,000 $ 7,094,000 $ 2,582,000 $(4,747,000) $(5,,003,000 ) Revenue Federal & State Grants 10, 162 ,000 22,500,000 35,788 ,000 44,471,000 31,544,ooo 8,119,000 Tra nsfer for Spa re Parts 265 ,000 Tax Le vy 7 ,200,000 7 ,2 00,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 7 ,200,000 7,200,000 Tota l Fu nds Aval Tab le $21,944,000 s31,34Ii,ooo sso,082,000 ss4,2s~.ooo $~3,99Z,O OO ~10 1 ~1 6 ,000 Expend iture Grant Funded Projects 46 MGD Activate d Sludge Plant $ 32,500,000 $26,700,000 5,800,000 Step I Fac ilities Pl an, EI S & JPL 4,000,000 3,500,000 500,000 Step 11 75 MGO Facilities Engr. 2,750,000 2,750,000 Step 11 50 MGD Faci li t ies Engr. 2,000,000 1 ,750,000 250,oq,o Step 111 75 MGD Cons truction (a) Oxy ge n Equipm e n t 8,000 ,000 1 ,000,000 7 ,000,000 (b) Flood Wa 11 & S ite Dev. 3,000,000 3,000,000 (c) Pu mp Station 2,000,000 500,000 1,500,000 (d ) Elect r ica l 5,500,000 ' 1,000,000 4,500,000 (e) Major Plant Facilities 43,00 0 ,0 00 7 ,000,000 18,000,000 15,000,000 3,000,000 St e p 111 50 MGD Construction (a) Major Equi pmen t 5,000,000 5,000 ,000 (b) Pu mp Station 3,000,000 3,000 ,000 (c) Major Plant Facilities 37,000,000 5,000 ,000 15,000,000 17,000,000 Step 111 50 MGD -Phase 111 (a) Major Equipment 5,000,000 5 ,000,000 (b) Major Plant Fa c ilities 40,000,000 2,000,000 18 ,000,000 15,000,000 5,000,000 Step I I I Miscellaneous Projects (a) 48 MGO Pr i mary Facilities 7,500,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 1,500,000 (b) Sol id s Hand! i ng 5,000,000 1,000 ,000 2,000,000 2,000 ,000 Sub -Total s205,2 50,ooo $30 1 200,000 s1~1 30 0 ,ooo $2 0 ,250,000 sli3 1 500,ooo S55,00o ,ooo S35 1 000 1 000 ~s.000 ,00 0 Non Grant Funded Projects Majo r Projects 15 ,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2 ,500 ,000 2,500 ,000 2,500,000 2,500,00 Minor Projects & Equi pme nt 9,000,000 1,500,000 1,500 ,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500 ,000 Sub-Total $ 24,000,000 $ li,000,000 s li,000 ,000 $ li,000,0 00 $ Ii,000,000 $ Ii 1 000 1 000 s Ii 1 00 0 1000 Total Projects Expendit ures $229,250,000 $30,200,000 $20,300,000 $24,250 ,000 $47 ,500,000 $59,000,000 $39,000,000 $ 9 ,000 ,000 Bait l -: · · -.ver "?Xt ~ 1,6r ... u uo 1 ,u94,,u $ 2 f,UL ,JOO $~,vvJ ,00 , ( ' Fi ca1 Yea r .., ,., • 747 •"""' $ 1 J.¥,-00 II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT 8 JOINT BOARDS SUPPLE MEN TAL AGENDA ITEMS AUGUST 11, 1976 -7:30 P.M. Post Offi ce Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephone:;: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following regarding appointments and seating new members of the Board: (*Mayor) Entity City of Laguna Bea ch South Coast County Water District Active Alternate Phyllis Sweeney* Carl Johnson, Jr. Harold E. Edwards AUGUST llJ 1976 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 1. WHAT ARE THE REACTIONS OF THOSE DIRECTORS THAT PARTICIPATED IN THE 7:00 P.M. MEETING WITH THE STAFF TO DISCUSS THE AGENDA ITEMS. 2. DIRECTOR ALICE MACLAIN WAS IN WASHINGTONJ D.C. ON AUGUST 2ND AND MET WITH THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AssOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES CAMSA) TO DISCUSS PENDING LEGISLATION ON WATER POLLUTION MATTERS. ALICEJ WOULD YOU CARE TO GIVE US A BRIEF REPORT ON THE MATTER. 3. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING THERE IS NO SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR AUGUST. IN THE EVENT A MEETING IS NECESSARYJ THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE WILL BE NOTIFIED. DISTRICT 7 DIRECTORS Law Offices Thomas L. Woodruff 1055 North Main Street, Suite 1020 Santa Ana, California 92701 August 5, 1976 The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California Post Office Box 8127 · Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Orange Park Acres Annexation -Special Counsel Gentlemen: Area Code 714 835-6212 During the course of the hearing at the District meeting on July 14, 1976, some question arose by several cf the Directors relating to the exact relationship of Mrs. Peggy McElligott to the property owners of the Orange Park Acres area and County Sanitation District No. 7. It was indicated that Mrs. McElligott had officially represented herself during the public hearing held before the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission as being special counsel to Sanitation District No. 7 and was presenting the position of the prop- erty owners on behalf of the District. Mr. Harper and I have, in accordance with directions of the Directors, thoroughly examined all correspondence and docu- mentation pertaining to Annexation No. 51 -Orange Park Acres, and submit the following as an explanation of our understanding of the relationship of Mrs. McElligott and her law firm. First, neither District No. 7 nor any other District has, in fact, retained Mrs. McElligott or her law firm for purposes of assisting in any way relating to the proposed annexation. Second, the District Directors have, in fact, expressly authorized the General Manager to hire special counsel at such time as deemed appropriate for the interests of the District. Third, the District staff and the residents of the Orange Park Acres area have worked extensively with Mrs. McElligott The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 August 5, 1976 Page Two to develop a workable legal procedure to accomplish the annexation together with the proposed improvement district, for payment of all necessary fees and charges to District No. 7. Fourth, the District Directors have required that the applicants for the annexation be responsible for the payment of all fees relating thereto, including those of special bond counsel in the sum of $2,500.00, should the election fail to receive approval by the voters. Fifth, the District has expended no monies whatsoever for pay- ment of legal fees to Mrs. McElligott or her firm. The fees which will be incurred by her will be paid by a deposit of monies from the Orange Park Acres Association to the District, which in turn will remit that sum to Mrs. McElligott's firm. It is the opinion of the undersigned and the General Manager that there was no misunderstanding as to the fundamental relationship of Mrs. McElligott with the District. Specif- ically, we had understood at all times that she would ultimately be retained by the District as· special counsel, based upon her particular expertise on the subject matter, as well as pro- viding considerable amounts of time and effort into the processing of the procedures to accomplish the annexation. However, it was our understanding that in the interim period she would effectively be acting on behalf of the proponents to establish for the District that the annexation was being done properly and would be an advantage to all parties concerned. To that extent, she was somewhat of an advocate on behalf of the proponents. Mrs. McElligott was never authorized to specifically represent herself to any other agency as special counsel for the District, but it is our opinion that there was absolutely no intent to misrepresent either the facts of the proceedings or of the relationship when Mrs. McElligott appeared before LAFC and before the District No. 7 Directors. Very truly yours, k:sct-d:a~· General Counsel TLW: ab August 5, 1976 Boards of Directors; Re: Joint Board Meetings --------· ------·. -·----~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-241 I The Executive Committee has discussed various means by which the time expended at Board Meetings could be utilized in the most efficient· manner. On several occasions the meetings have been delayed while questions are asked of staff which may be important only to one or two Directors while there is no apparent controversy as to the subject matter. Since we have a substantial number of elected people in attendance, it is our desire to spend their limited, valuable time on the more important aspects of the Sani- tation Districts' operation and administration. It is the Committees' request that the Directors avail themselves of the opportunity to have their questions answered concerning agenda items prior to the Board Meeting. The Districts' staff will be available immediately preceding each Wednesday's meeting at 7:00 p.m. Our request to seek answers to your questions prior to each meeting should not be construed, in any way, as an attempt to eliminate discussion or debate on agenda items. The Directors will continue to have ample opportunity to express their views and the contro- versial subjects will be debated in full during the course of all scheduled meetings. Don Winn Joint Chairman -. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108"'4 ELLIS AvENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 August 10, 1976 (714) 962-241 I To: Boards of Directors From: Director Alice MacLain Subject: Discussions with Executive Director of the Association of Metro- politan Sewerage Agencies, Washington, D. C., August 2, 1976 Reference: HR 9560 I met with Ron Linton, the Executive Director of AMSA, for the purpose of obtaining a status briefing on HR 9560 (S 2710) amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The Senate Public Works Committee has scheduled a meeting for August 10th to consider the House-passed bill, HR 9560. It appeared on August 2nd that the Senate Committee would restrict itself to four items: 1. The certification to the states of the grant program-- otherwise known as the Cleveland-Wright Bill. 2. The Section 404 dispute over the definition of navigable waters, Corps of Engineers' permits for dredging operations. 3. The allocation formula for distribution of grant funds to the states. 4. Extension of the July 1, 1977, secondary treatment deadline. (Presumably, the extension language will be identical or similar to HR 9560.) It appears that from Mr. Linton's discussions with Senate staff personnel, the Committee will simply offer these four items as amendments to S 2710 which was the original Senate bill with the $5 billion, one-year extension of authori- zation for the construction grant program. The Senate staff assumes that based on this recommendation the Senate will simply modify S 2710 along the lines suggested and return it to the House. The House can either accept it or, ;nost probably, will ask for a conference. As for timing, Ron Linton believes that this will be taken up during the first or second week after Congress re-assembles on August 23rd following tl1e Rcpublicun Convention. Boards of Directors August 10, 1976 Page Two The AMSA staff has discussed with Senate Committe personnel the ad valorem tax issue and has proposed some new wording, which was acceptable to the Senate in 1971, moving the ad valorem tax issue to the EPA Administrator and the local entities. Since EPA has ruled in favor of ad valorem taxes for revenue purposes in the past, we could assume that this strategy with the Senate Committee would solve our current problems. Local Action Once S 2710 is amended by the Senate to incorporate the aforementioned four items and the House asks for a conference, the AMSA staff will advise us when we should exert pressure on our elected officials in Washington for passage of the hill with the necessary amendments. II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post OHice Box 8 1 2 7 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE AUGUST 11, 1976 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD, IN ADDITION, STAFF . WILL BE AVAILABLE AT 7:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOINING THE DISTRICTS' BOARD ROOM, (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointme~t of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT Consideration of motions approving ~inutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 July 14, 1976 regular District 2 July 14, 1976 r~g:ular District 3 July 14, 1976 regular District s July 14, 1976 regular District 6 July 14, 1976 regular District 7 July 14, 1976 regular District 8 June 9, 1976 regular District 1.1 -July 14, 1976 regular (6) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 1 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "E" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" and "E" DISTRICT NO. 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "F" DISTRICT NO. 11 NONE (8) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 8(A) THROUGH 8( V) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included· 6rt-··the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- "-"" '. (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) ' (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Surge Tower No. 2 Extension at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-9-2, granting a time extension of 36 calendar days to the contract with F. T. Ziebarth Company due to delays caused by having to coordinate the work with the Districts' operations. See page "G" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No.8 to the plans and specifications for 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. l, Job No. Pl-16, authorizing an addition of $3,000.00 to the contract with Donovan Construction Company for purchase of a spare pump impellar. See page "H" Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-132, approving plans and specifications for Installation of Additional Pumping Facilities at Foster Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Job No. J-6-lD, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on August 31, 1976 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-133, approving plans and specifications for Three Gear Reducers for Rehabilitation of Rothrock Pumping Station, Specification No. E-080, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for an amount not to exceed $50,000. See page · "I" Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-134, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities, Job No. I-4-lR, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received on August 31, 1976 Consideration of Resolution No. 76-135, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Automatic Gate Operators, Diversion Structure at Reclamation Plant No. l, Job No. PW-052, to Instrumentation & Mechanical Systems, Inc., in the amount of $22,688.00. See pages "J" and "K" Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding purchase order contract to Stauffer Chemical Company for Purchase of SO~c> Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-024, for the price of $.10 per pound for a maximum amount not to exceed $75,000. See page "L" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-136, ac~epting Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, as complete; authorizing execution of a Notice of Con~letion; and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "M" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-137, approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for installation of three underground transformer vaults behind the sidewalk of Brookhurst Street within the boundaries of Plant No. 2, at no cost. See page "N" (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and two staff members to attend concurrent meetings of the Water Pollution Control Federation and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies in Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 3-8, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred in connect{on with attendance at said meetings (k) Consideration of motion approving waiver of $150.00 quarterly administrative charge to County Sanitation District No. 8 for fiscal year 1976-77 DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-138-2, authorizing filing grant application re feasibility study for sewering Sleepy Hollow- Carbon Canyon drainage agea. See page "0" (m) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-139-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 26.382 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Mesa Drive and Loma Street (Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Tract No. 8885 to County Sanitation District No. 2) (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor and South Santa Ana River Interceptor Connector, Reache5 2, 3 & 4, Contract No. 2-14-3, authorizing an addition of $25,080.00 to the contract with John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. for District and City of Anaheim inter--trunk connections, $7,425.00 to be reimbursed by the City for their share of said costs. See page "P" (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-16-2, authorizing an addition of $7,086.98 to the contract with Vida Artukovich & Sons, Inc. for additional requirements of Cal Trans for freeway crossing and alignment modifications due to underground utilities. See page "Q" DISTRICT 3 (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-140-3, authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Federal-Mogul, Arrowhead Products in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, and authorizing payment in the amount of '-"' $2, 501. 00 for said easement. See page "R" (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (8) . (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-141-5, approving Addendum No. One to First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating Newport-Irvine Waste-Management Planning Agency (NIWA) authorizing inclusion of the City of Santa Ana as an additional member agency. See page "S" DISTRICT 7 (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-142-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from John D. O'Donnell and Partners, for a permanent easement for local sewer service southerly of Alton Avenue and easterly of Red Hill Avenue in the Irvine Industrial Complex area, at no cost to the District. See page "T" (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-143-7, authorizing acceptance of Temporary and Permanent Underground Easement from Nellie M. Reeve in connection with construction of the Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reacn 14 and Reaches 15 & 16, Contract No. 7-6-9, and authorizing payme~t in the amount of $3,250.00 for permanent easement and $2,250.00 for temporary easement. See page "U" (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from John B. Lyttle, Lemon Heights, for annexation of 7.849 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Ranch Hill and Las Luces in the Lemon Heights area, and refer to staff for study and recommenda- tion. See page "V" (u) Consideration of motjon to receive and file request from Bart K. Baker for annexation of 13.24 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of Peters Canyon Road, adjacent to Sirrine, Mira Vista and Overhill Drives, and refer to staff for study and recommendation. See page "W" DISTRICT 11 (v) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair, Newland- Delaware Trunk, Contract No. 11-lR-l, authorizing a deduction of $1,140.00 from the contract with Rewes-Schock, J.V. due to a reduction of Fiberglass lining thickness. See page "X" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- (10) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) (1) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding with Orange County Employees Association relative to terms and conditions of proposed transfer from Public Employees Retirement System to Orange County Employees Retirement System (2) Consideration of motion declaring intent to approve transfer of Districts' retirement program from Public Employees Retirement System to the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in accordance with Section 20569 of the Government Code (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-144, approving amendment to the Joint Powers Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program agreement, to provide for an increase in the scope of the study and a grant augmentation therefor; and funding of the ineligible portion of the ocean disposal studies and authorizing participation in said ocean disposal studies, as follows: See page "Y" Proposed Current Proposed Total Maximum Maximum Maximum CS DOC Proposed CSDOC Authorization Authorization Increased Share Maximum Share LA/OMA Grant ($83,333 CSDOC) ($141,667) 58,334 (1/3) Funded Projects $2.0 Million $3. 4 Million $425,000 (12.S~o) $141,667 (1/3) Non-Grant Funded Ocean Uisposal ($2~,000 CSDOC) 25,000 Study -0-75,000 25,000 (1/3) CSDOC TOTAL INCREASE $ 83,334 (c) Consideration of motion authorizing each Executive Committee member or· their designee to attend State association workshops and executive meetings on behalf of the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement in accordance with established Board policies (12) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report re additional hydraulic treatment capacity. See page "Z" (13) ALL DISTRICTS Staff report on proposed fiscal year 1976-77 budgets. (NOTE: Each individual District will consider its budget under a separate agenda item of the respective District.) (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items relative to operation and evaulation phase of the JPL-ACTS process: (a) Staff report. Sec page "AA" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to proceed with facility ~ modifications to the JPL-ACTS process and co11tinued operation and evaluation of said process t11rough June 30, 1977, subject to written approval of the State Water Resources Control Board (Continued on page 7) -6- (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (c) Consideration of motion approving revised Step 1 Facilities Plan, Environmental Impact Statement and Pilot Plant Evaluation budget in the total amount of $4,170,000 and authorizing transfer of up to $489,000 to the Joint Operating Fund from the Operating Fund Unappropriated Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their proportional participation in the Joint Operating budget, for continued operation and evaluation of said process; and up to $125,000 to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund from the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Reserves of the respective Districts, in accordance with their Joint Works equity percentage participation in the CORF budget, for necessary modifications to the JPL-ACTS process. (NOTE: The above costs will be offset by 87~% grant revenue anticipated in 1977-78.) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Part-time Technicians as provided in Resolution No. 75-138, as amended by Resolution No. 76-24, through June 30, 1977, in connection with continued operation of the JPL-ACTS process. (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-145, authorizing amendment to the contract with National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. See page "BB" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-146, authorizing amendment to the contract with John Carollo Engineers for required services in connection with continued operation and evaluation of the JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services by $75,000. See page "CC" (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 2 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget -7- (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) OISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hall (25) DISTRICT 6 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 Operating Fund budget . See page "DD" (29) DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 11 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (32) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, ·if any (33) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 3 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (35) DISTRICT 3 (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, authorizing an addition of $14,189.17 to the contract with B & P Construction Company, for extra work incurred as a result of incorrect delineation of water main by Southern California Water Company. See page "EE" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Counsel to proceed with necessary action against Southern California Water Company to recover extra costs incurred by the District in connection with construction of Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-2, due to the incorrect delineation by the Water Company of IO-inch water line (36) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -8- (37) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (38) DISTRICT 7 Roll call vote motion approving 1976-77 fiscal year budget (39) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of items relative to proposed Annexation No. 51 - Orange Park Acres Annexation: See page "FF" (a) Open hearing (b) Presentation of Engineer's Report for proposed Improvement District (c) Questions from staff and directors (d) .Report of Secretary on all written protests or objections that have been received, if any (e) Comments from public, if any (f) Close hearing (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-147-7, approving and adopting the Engineer's Report for Orange Park Acres Improvement District as submitted without modification or change. See page "GG" (40) DISTRICT 7 .Consideration of Resolution No. 76-148-7,·ratifying conditions and approving agreement with Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, for deferring payment of portion of annexation fees relative to Ridgeline/Lazy B Annexation -Annexation No. 55. See pages "HH" and "II" (41) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (42) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p .m., August 11 , 1976 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called a nd the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded a nd duly carried: That this meeti n g of the Board of Dire c tors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m., Augus t 12, 197 6, at Newpor t Beac h City Hall . The Chairman then de clared the meeting so adjourned at 8 :23 p.m.,· Augus t 11, 19 76. DISTRICT 6 This 11th day of August, 1976, at 7:30 p .m., b e ing the time and place for the Regular Meeting of County San itation Di s trict No . 6, of Orange County, California, a nd there not Adjournment of mee ting by Secretary being a quorum of said Board present, the meet ing of Di s trict No. 6 was t h ereupon ad journed by the Secret a ry t o 5:00 p.m., August 12, 19 76 , at Newport Beach City Hall DISTR ICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded a nd duly carried: Th a t · this meet i n g of the Board of Directors of County Sa nitation District No. 11 be a djourned to 6:00 p.m ., September 8, 197 6 . Th e Chairman then declared t h e meeting so adjo ur n ed at 8 :25 p.m., August 11, 19 76 . STATE OF CAL I FORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Bo a rds of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and fore going to b e full, true and correct copy of mi nute entries on meeting of said Bo a rds of Di r ectors on the 11th day of August , 19 76 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto 19 76 day of August S-107 cretajy f ;[he Boards of Directors County S ~itation Distri c ts Nos. , 2 ,/3, S, 6, 7, a nd 11 " EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., August 11 , 1976 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m.,· August 11, 1976. DISTRICT 6 This 11th day of August, 1976, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California, and there not Adjournment of meeting by Secretary being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 6 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hall DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 6:00 p.m., September 8, 1976. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., August 11, 1976. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, J. WAYNE SYLVESTER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 11th day of August , 19 76 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of August 19 76 . S-107 Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 MEETING DATE August 11. 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS. 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,&ll (DISTRICT I ."" ~ ·-. r/ lt.VANSL .. -•••••• G-ARTHE.~ .... _____ _ (EDGAR) ......... SHARP ...... _../_ ---- , ~ (DIEDRICHl ..... i:':TTIN······ ~ ---- ~ RIMA ....... • __!=__ ---- DISTRICT 2 (GROOT). ........ WEDAA ••••••• _v ___ -- (HOLLI NDENL .•• SCOTT ....... _.; ____ _ (DIEDRICH) ...... CLARK ....... ~ ___ _ (GARTHE). ....... EVANS....... .I ___ _ ~WEDDLE) ........ FOX.......... ../ ___ _ DE J~sus) ...... HOLT ......... __/_ ---- THOM) .......... KAYWOOD ••••• + ___ _ PERRY ••••••• _____ _ (HOYT) .•.••••••• SMITH ....... _./_ ---- ~TIPTON) •••• _ .... WINN ........ _./ ___ -- WARD) •••••••••• WOOD • • • • • • • • ' ___ _ GRAHAM) •••••••• YOUNG • • • • • • • -r __ --· DISTRICT 3 (WARD) ••••. ." ••.• WOOD ........ _.; ___ ""_ -- (HOLL I NDEN) • • · · SVALSTAD· • • • -'---L--- (GRAY) .......... BLACKMAN-· .. _, ___ v_ -- (WEDDLE) .. ·•·••• COOPER······ " ____.L_ -- (SYLVIA) ........ ~········ -r ---lL---CULVER •••.•• __ ._.; ___ v __ _ (GARTHE). · • · .. · · EVANS······· _v _ _.\l_ __ (PRIEST) ........ FRESE ....... _L_ _}j_ -- ~THOM) .......... KAYWOOD· .... _,; ___ ..; __ _ LACAYO) ........ MAC LAIN····_._.; ___ ..;_ -- DAVI s) · · .. · · · .. MEYER······· _.I_ --"--- OLSON .. · • • • • -7--+ -- (WI EDER) ....•.. · PATTINSON··· __ --·-__ (DIEDRICH) .. · .. • SCHMIT··· .. • _./_ --"-__ (YOUNG)········· STEVENS····· + _v __ _ {MILLER)··· ..... WEISHAUPT .. • __ __:L_ __ DISTRICT 5 ./ MC INNIS.... V ___ _ (D I.EDR I CH~ ...... RI LEY....... ./ --T __ {WI ~-SJAMS-r.=-"''\ ROG ER S . . • • • • _.; ____ _ @lliRI CT 6 ,,.: '--------·. .-------· RI MA f/- (ROG ER S) ........ RYCKOFF::::: -\/----- >(DIEDRICH) ...... JdfTifL..... fJ..· == == DISTRICT 7 ! EDGAR) ......... SAL TAR ELLI • " . 4- ROGERs). ·······BARRETT .. ••• -"-. ----..J-- SILLS) ......... BURTON ...... --.. , ----..J- DIEDRICH) ...... CLARK....... C?C == t. EVANS)· .... •· .. GARTW£· .... • _./ ___ -"'"- GLOCKNER···· _±.._ ____ ('}._ (HOYT)········ .. SMITH······· ~ ____ ... _ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _i_ + __ SHENKMAN •.•• _v ____ _ WI EDER •••••• _w-_· __i__ __ DISTRICT 8 ./ (DJEDRICH)q .... RILEY ....... _.; ___ -- EDWARDS..... ti .; (JOHNSON) ....... SWEENEY .•.•• _&_ ~ == 7/14/76 JOINT BOARDS ROGERS~ ....•••. BARRETT·..... I DIEDRICH) ...... ] lfl ..... ~ -- GRAY)) •••.•••••• BLACKMAN •••• -" __ _ SILLS ... ~ •••••• BURTON •••••• _I __ _ DIEDRICHJ •••.•• CLARK ....... ~ __ WEDDLE) .•••••••• COOPER •.••••• + __ SYLVIA) ......... ~ ........ -y---. CULVER ••••••• ___ _ ~GARTHE~ ......... EVANS ........ ~ __ WEDDLE .•••••••• FOX ••.••••••• + __ PR I EST ......... FRESE •..••••• ___ _ EV~~·····--- GLOCKNER •••• ~ __ ~DE J~sus) •••••• HOLT. •.•••••• _J_ -- THOM) ........... KA Ywoon..... "' LACAYO l. ....... MAC LA IN • • • • .,, == MC INNIS.... .; (DAVI s) .......... MEYER........ ../ == · OLSON........ fA.- (WI EDER).· ....... PATTINSON... v == PERRY........ t1 (DIEDRICH).~···· RILEY .••••••• +== RIMA ••..••••• WILLIAMS) •••••. ROGERS ....... +==· ROGERS} •••••••• RYCKOFF •••••• EDGAR) •••••••••• SALTARELLI •• -"'--- DIEDRICH) .•.••. SCHMIT ••••••• -v--.- HOLLI NDEN) ••••. SCOTT........ ./ == EDGAR) .•••.••••. SHARP ........ _.1 __ _ . SHEN KMAN.... ./ ~HOYT) •••••.••••• SMITH .••••••• -,/-. -- YOUNG) .•••.••..• STEVENS ••••• --zi=--- HOLLI NDEN) •••.. SVALSTAD •••• -./--- (GROOT) .....••••• WEDAA ...••..• -,/-, -- (MILLER l ........ WEISHAUPT... ., == WIEDER •.•••• * ~TIPTONL ••••••• WINN •••••.••• \;.· == WARD) •.••••••••• WOOD. • • • . • .. • ., ~RAHAML ••••••• YOUNG .••••••• ___..,L_ _:__ OTHERS ~·l{, ) ,_'. J HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE ~ ~( ~ (" TAYLOR., ·l ~.t1n .. ·--r-·.•.(·· ,. BROWN ~ ~·-···,()LP-.· r". \\Ji.-:>U ! r r.. ~. C• .. , I \I I"-. I -.· jC : WOODRUFF r ." / ·. l HOHENER • i l 1 HOWARD .' · \ :, HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS MEETING DATE August 11, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS. 1,2,3,S,6 ,7 ,B,&ll DISTRICT I ;;,,~ ...-.. (EVANS). ........ GARTllE ...... -i._ ~ __ (EDGAR) ••.••• • .. SHARP •••••• _r__ __.___ __ (DIEDRICHL .... BATHN······ _.0.:.._ CL. __ RIMA •••.•••• ~ ...:.L--- DISTRICT 2 ~:li- (GRooTL •••••••• WEDAA ••••••• ~ _v_· --- (HOLLI NDENL ••• SCOTT ••••••• ~ )' (DIEDRICH>.. •••• CLARK ••••••• ....c&:_ _..2-.__ (GARTHE) •••••••• EVANS ••••••• --..JL. _j__ == ~WEDDLE) •••••••• FOX •••••••••• ~ .:f__ __ DE J~susL •••• HOLT ••••••••• -z,.L-_:j_ -- THOM) •••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• ~ _:;___ __ PERRY • • • • • • • .,,.-~ __ (HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH ••••••• ~ J_ __ ~TIPTON) ••••••.• WINN ••• •• •• • r/ _L__ WARD) •••••• · •••• WOOD • • • • • • • • ,,,.-~ == GRAHAM) •.•••••• YOUNG ••••••• ---1L _J__ __ . DISTRICT 3 ~-3~ (WARD) •••••• -• • • • WOOD • • • • • • • • --.k:::_ _'.1_ __ (HOLLI NDEN) • • · · SVALSTAD· • • • V" .:f__ -- (GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· _L_ :J__ -- (WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ V ..:L_ __ (SYLVIA) •• •••••• jj'K-•. · ••.•••. v _j__ __ · CULVER······ . v-"' .::!___ -- (GARTHE) · • · • • • • • EVANS······· / .../---- !PRIEST) .••• •••• FRESE·······~ _v_ -- THOM) • • • • • • • • • • KAYWOOD····· ~ _.i__ -- LACAYO)······ .. MAC LAIN···· ·./ .Y__ -- DAVI s) · · · · · · · · · MEYER······· V"""' L---OLSON •• , , • •• Q_, _f2::::_ __ !WIEDER) •.•••••. PATTINSON··· V-.· _y__ __ DIEDRJCH) •.••.. SCHMIT······ ~-fl=::_ -- YOUNG)., ••.••.• S~S····· ~ L_ -- MILLER)········ WEISHAUPT··· _Ly__ -- DISTRICT 5 ~J£L MC INNIS.... ~ _y __ _ (DIEDRICH) •••••• RI LEY....... i;:. _)_. __ _ (WILLIAMS) ••••.• ROGERS .••••• ___ 'II __ _ DISTRICT 6 JOINT BOARDS ROGERS}········ BARRETT· •.••• ~ DIED~ICH) •••..• BfTTJN ••••••• _ a--_. == GRAY)) ••.••.•••. BLACKMAN •••• ~ __ SILLS ••• ~ .•.••• BURTON • • • • • • ~ D I ED R IC HJ •••••. CLARK • • • • • • • a_.., --WEDDLE~, ........ COOPER....... ·v::: -- SYLVIA ••••••••. <*< ........•. ~ == ! ~ CULVER. •••••• ~ GARTHE ......... EVANS ........ ~ == WEDDLE .••••••.• FOX •••••••••• _· __ _ PR I EST ••••••••• FRESE........ ~ ~s) .......... C3ARTllEo •••••• == == GLOCKNER • • • • a.., ~DE J~sus) ...... HOLT. ........ ~ == THOM) .•••••••••• KAYWOOU ..... ~ LACAYOL ••••••. MAC LAIN •••• ~== MC INNIS .... ~-- (DAVI s) .......... MEYER •••••••• ~ __ · OLSON........ U- (WI EDER).· ....... PATTINSON... V--== PERRY........ ~ (DIEDRICH) •••••• RILEY........ ....,....--== . RIMA ......... C.L-__ WILLIA~S) •••••. ROGERS .••.••• ~ __ • ROGERSl •••••••• RYCKOFF .••••• ~ __ EDGAR) •.•••••••• SALTARELLI •• ~- DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT •.••••• ~_._ HOLLINDEN) ••••. SCOTT •.•.•.•• ~ __ EDGAR) .......... SHARP........ ~ __ SHENKMAN .... ~ __ ~~OYT) .••••.••••• SMI!H·. ~.~ .••• ~ __ I 0UPJG) .....•.... ·STEvrns ••.•. ---- HOLLI ND EN) ..... SVALSTAD .... ~ __ (GROOT) ..••••••.. WEDAA .......• ~ __ (MILLERL ....... WEISHAUPT... ~ __ WIEDER ...... ~ __ ~TIPTONL ....... WINN ••••.•••• ~ __ WARD) ........... WOOD .•••...•• ~ __ GRAHAML ....... YOUNG .•.••••• ~ _· _ OTHERS ~ . RI MA • • • • • • • • Cw ____ ~ \\.-·· .·. · 1... · .. \.U..··~ HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE (ROGERS). ••••.•• RYCKOFF ••••• ~ ____ \ .... * '""' ,. (DI EDR ICHL ••.• B, TTf fl...... LL ______ .,, DISTRICT 7 11 ~:r ~ 31tj) ~ t{ ._. !EDGAR) ••••••••• SALTARELLI. V _'/ __ Y_ y ROGERS).······· BARRETT····· V _l_ _'/_ y SILLS) •••••••.• BURTON...... V-..1__ .:/__ '{ DIEDRICH).····· CLARK······· ~ ~ ___fb_ lL EVANS).·.······ GARTllE • • • • • • V _j__ _j__ Y GLOCKNER···· (1-CL Q.. <2 (HOYT)·········· SMITH······· _L .i__ ~ N DISTRICT 11 ~ (DIEDRICH) •••••• SCHMIT •••••• __;L __lL_ __ SHENKMAN.... ~ _l __ _ WI EDER • • • • • • \./"' _j__ __ DISTRICT 8 ( ) v I DIEDRICH q••·· RILEY •• _ ••••• --;v---- EDWARDS ••••• ~ '.L_ __ (JOHNSON) .•••••• SWEENEY •••• • __ ~ __ 7/14/76 . TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF HOH EN ER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PI ER SALL STEVENS TRAVERS ·-.\ 1-rrr' .. ,.:. i ~ . • I • AUGUST 11, 1976 JOINT MEETING .) Re port of the Joint Chairman Winn referred to the notice on the first page of the agenda rega rding any questions Directors might have for staff. Said we would try this procedure for a few months to see how it works and if there was no interes t, would drop it. Reported Alice MacLain was in Washington, D.C. on August 2nd and met with Executive Director of AMSA to discuss p e nding legislation on water pollution matters. Asked Alice to give a brief report. She just referred to the written report in the Directors' folders prepared by FAH for her and said s he thought it covered everything she wanted to say. (See attached) Advised there would be no Executive Committee meeting for Augu s t. (6b) Report of the General Manager FAH advised that he had reported several months ago that because of failure to ge~ a permit from the Coastal Commis s ion for installation of JPL-ACTS facility,the Commi ssi on had turned the matter over to Attorney General's office. Attorney General said they could fine us. REL represented the Districts at hearing on June 26th. Through the motions of Supervisor Schmit and Councilman Knoll(?) from Los Ang e les, we got off free. Schmit moved we be fined $1.00 . ~er e s everal conditions put on n ext p ermit h av ing to do with flood wall around facility a nd s hould b eautify area aro und JPL faci l ity. Referred to budget items on agenda wh ich had b een reviewed by the Executive Committee . Said the attempt was to reduce the tax rate as mu ch as p ossib l e a nd sti ll meet the ongoing plans for improved treatment. We have h ad a lot of cal l s from interested organi zat ions in Co unty asking for s ubst antial decreases in District tax r a tes. In last fiv e years have made some s ubsta ntial reductions in tax rate. The Di stricts have b een at t e mpting to reduce them. Referred to report in agenda on capacity at treatment works . Said in recent t a lks with p eop le in Sac r ame nto and San Francisco in app ears they will a llow us, in conjunc ti on with the 75 MGD secondary treatment, to up grade our primary capaci ty of the Pl ant by giving a new rating to ov erflow rate on our primary c l a rifier. Think thi s will solve problem of capacity . (6c) Report of the General Counsel TLW reported there were no s i gnificant matters during the course of the month not cov ered in the agenda package. Said he d i d fi l e, in accordance with action of the Board, against South ern California Gas Company for recovery of some $20,000 in addi tional costs incurred by District as a result of Gas Company failing to provide data to Districts. Will keep Directors posted on thi s . Advised that we have reorganized the c l a im s procedure with our insurance company to reduce direct expenses of Districts and improve the record in terms of claims filed again s t Di s tricts. On contract s wh ere they are required to mak e u s a n addition a l insured along with consulting en gine e rs, e tc., we ha v e several injuries pending . Our own insurance co mp a ny wasn't bird-dogging them as they s hould and we now h a v e s h a ken the tree so are being turned ov er immediately to contractor so they are stan din g t i me and expen se of defending. We will sti ll keep track of what is going on. Said during the last couple months h e h ad b een unnecessarily appearin g and defending laws uit rather than have default go again st the Di stri cts. TLW also mentioned the notice mailed to Directors with agenda material regarding a change in the organization of his office. Said he was happy to announce this and if anyone had any questions, to please advise. Winn then recognized press and dignitaries, if any. (Said to put this item on agenda to do at each meeting???) (llc) E.C. item re members (Chairmen) attending meetings & conferences on behalf of District Winn asked for Directors' opinions or discussion regarding this item. Some discussion. Called for the question. Voice motion. Mclnnis voted no and Svalstad said he abstained. Building Committee report Culver then briefly reported that the Building Committee had met prior to the Joint Meeting and finalized preliminary plans. Will be back to Board in October. (13) Staff report on 1976-77 budgets JWS gave usual brilliant explanation of budgets. Svalstad asked if adjustment from assessed valuation is taken up in reduced tax rate. Was answered yes, because of increase in A.V. didn't have to raise tax rate. Probably would have had to otherwise. We still don't know State requirements or ad valorem tax issue. Will be coming back to Board in the event Congress does not move on ad valorem tax issue to implement user charge effective July 1st. JWS reported further that re cash flow projections, if we have to go to secondary treatment for total flow, State will pay 87~%. When it is built, M & 0 costs will be entirely local share. Joint Operating cost riow 5%. At full secondary treatment, that will be 26% of the budget. In the 1980's anticipate $24 million Joint Operating budget. Holt asked question regarding page 2 of cover report where all Directors were cautioned except those in two Districts. Asked which two Districts? JWS answered Districts 3 and 11. District 3 adopted connection fee and slipped construction schedule a little. No further questions.· (14) JPL-ACTS process REL reported that we have completed the 1 MGD facility of the JPL-ACTS process at Plant 2 and have operated it during the initial shakedown operation period which was completed July 2, 1976. Have to take second look at what we have and where we are going. We do have certain modifications that are necessary to sustain continuous operation and need concurrence of State and EPA on effort. Have submitted Phase 2. $3.5 million to $4.1 million. Will resume after Labor Day until June next year. Are some areas to define and determine effectiveness. Are a lot of pluses coming out. Said Gillette concurs with the budget and a letter approving this will be in our hands this Friday allowing us to proceed. There are services required by staff of JPL and JCE for consulting on this project. Contract amount has been extended by amendment to original grant received a few months ago. Young asked when Directors would get a look at this facility. REL said it was a good-looking plant and were really proud of it. Would c onduct a tour just prior to Oc tober Board meeting. Winn me ntioned we wou ld look into possibility of dinner before meeting a l so . ?? -2 - (25) DISTRICT 6 adjournment Secretary adjourned District 6 for lack of a quorum to 5:00 p.m., August 12, 1976, at Newport Beach City Hall. 3) DISTRICT 11 adjournment Adjourned to 6:00 p.m., September 8, immediately preceding t h e Joint Meeting. Will also adjourn from that meeting to September 13 at the City of Huntington Beach. (36) DISTRICT 3 Other Business Chairman Wood stated she could not go to the CASA Conference in San Diego and anybody wishing to attend in her behalf should please contact Mr. Harper as she will be leaving town tomorrow. (39) DISTRICT 7 -Annexation No. 51 -Orange Park Acres Smith stated that he wondered if we should have the hearing until all the funds were in from OPA? TLW advised that at this moment the idea of the election going until March has not been determined. Will be determined by action of the Directors, or may be beyond control of Directors. In order to program for March election, would advise Directors to take action by minute order advising s .taff to take necessary steps rather than proceeding to meet a No v ember deadline . Said last action of the Directors was to have staff do Engineer ing Reports for November election date, unless Directors want to change it . This public hearing has been published and hearing is somewhat of a technical nature. Is not the last hearing. Said he would recomm e nd completing this hearing to avoid add itional co s t s. REL pointed to area on map and said Engineering Report encompa ss e s unincorporated territory in OPA. 545 acres. 85% developed at present time and pres entl y s e rved by their own private disposal systems. Said this rep ort s e ts forth the cost for annexation to the Sanitation Districts. Sanitation Di s tric t s c oul d provide necessary treatment. Costs given in Engineering Report and s u gg e s ts diff ere nt methods of payment. Basically structured around improvement distr ict wh e re people would be assessed for actual cost and fina n c ed over a period of time --from 10 -15 years, as allowed by law. Saltarelli asked if there were any bills outstanding for which there were no f unds to pay. Was answered that we have rec eived none. Th en asked if we have an e s timate of what tota l cost will be in determina tion of t ax r a te. REL ans we r e d that t a x rate on 15 -year bond wi ll be $200-225 per year. About $5000 co s t for 1 a c r e development. Questioned how much on tax rate? Based on as s e ss e d va luation o f $5~ million, tax rate will be about $2.30 p e r $100. Only for their s e we r s and for their paym e nt into the Sanitation Di s tric t s . In addi tion, would be subject to the S.D. tax which is about 40¢. Tota l rate $2 .70 p e r $100 . About $2 50 per year for 1 acre. Asked if that assessme nt will run wi t h the land or the person who incurred it or what? Advised it will go with the l and. Smith a sked if thi s i s for the ma in trunk line? REL said inc l u ded in t h e co s t is the basic backbon e local sewer system . Doe s not s e r ve every p arce l. As . othe r a r e a s need th e sew e r s , could exp a nd that sys t e m. Would b e suff i c ien t -funds generated to con s truc t or acquire the trunk sewer facilities in t h e a r ea a nd provide backbon e loc al s ystem. For onl y about 30 % of the parce l s . They will n eed local sewe r s fina n ced by d ev e lope r s or privat e s e wers . Persons not r ec e iving this s ervice will still pay sam e fees . The whol e prog r a,m was represented to hom eo wners' a ssoci a tion. Initi a l repor t envi s ion ed sewe r i n g ev e ry p a rce l a nd tha t c o st was qu i t e a bit more . Thi s pla n was mor e acceptab l e to homeo wn e r s ' assoc i a tion. Bas ed on meetings with them , the scope was reduced . -3- !bk " ~ &,.:.. ,..; I ,,..,(,k "lvv ~,!,!., .. ~ ¥ { ' Smith commented that suppose this all goes through, 70% will be unable to get sewer service under this Improvement District. Asked what happens when pressure mounts to the District? Are we going to be in a bind here? Is there any chance of a problem for the District? REL said he didn't foresee it as such. There are other cases such as this in the District where people have been paying taxes .and have to extend trunk sewers through assessment districts. Saltarelli asked if inclusion in the assessment district is permissable or mandatory? Peggy replied that this now is not an assessment district but an improvement district. Is a general obligation bond and is mandatory. Sub assessment districts would be optional. Peggy stated further that the bond is for all of the costs of annexation and the payment for the buy-in for construction of Reaches 17 and 18 and that is for everybody in that improvement district. An assessment district is not being formed now. Will have future annexations if that occurs. REL explained further on the blackboard the backbone system and the ultimate future construction. Said basic bond and election concerned with two things-- (1) annexation to the District and (2) paying for this backbone system. He stated further regarding the Improvement District. Said Engineer's Report figure of $2.30 per $100 A.V. includes annexation and trunk sewer and backbone local sewer. Our connection charge would go into bond redemption when they tie into · sys:t'em to reduce it. When other property owners desire sewer service, then an assessment district would be created for those local sewers. Saltarelli asked for an idea of what the the assessment district charge would be. REL just guessed $1000 or $1500 per lot. Assessment district charge goes with the land also. TLW advised that he met with representative of OPA July 19th and it was determined that about $5500 would be needed to pay remaining costs. Gave brief list of costs. Said Kvinge indicated they are collecting money now. Received $2500 tQis week. TLW said official action by the Board as of this time is that staff has been authorized to proceed on a pay-as-you-go basis. They have made two prior deposits totaling about $6800 which were used to pay Boyle for their report and for in-house legal and engineering costs and administrative and publication expenses. Said staff is not authorized to proceed unless and until expenses are paid. They are aware of that at OPA. Smith asked if a Board like ours has ever met in a local area or in a local school? Winn suggested this might be a good idea. Saltarelli said we should continue hearing somewhere in OPA area. Said nobody really knows yet what is going to happen. November ballot is too soon to get on it. Said he learned of two new developments tonight re two districts involved-- assessment district and improvement district. Thought it would be appropriate to continue hearing and have staff there to answer questions and give them financial information. TLW clarified that with regard to scope of project, the initial engineering report was prepared by Boyle and was done to provide several alternatives. Was bare minimum system, Reaches 17 & 18,and then three add-ons. They wanted to look at all systems including pricing. Engineering report addresses itself to that. -Stated that the ultimate decision was with the proponents, although District 7 will have to defirie scope of bond proposition. Stated that the February staff report to Directors specified that ·at that point of time it was the request of the resident proponents that the system be in the following s cope --$1,141,000 would include payment of the annexation fee s and only the ma s ter trunk--none of the other bac kbones. If they chose to go to the complete -4- system, are t alk ing over $_2, 300, 000. Based on a cornmuni ty survey, they elected not to go for the whole system. Saltarelli asked how the vote is conducted on that. By A.V . or by resident voters . TLW said by resident voters of entire area . Bond election requires 2/3 vote. Assessment district voted on by people in assessment district area. Smith then asked if there was any objection to the Board meeting out there? Evans stated he didn't see why we couldn 't pass the resolution on the Engineer's Report as this discussion didn't have anything to do with the Engineer's Report. TLW advised that the Directors are going to be requested somewhere along the way to call an election and form an improvement district. At one point it was contem- plated that it would be presented to the Board by September 8th . Staff's recommenda- tion is that it is not going to fly timing-wise anyway. One chance in a million there will be a special board meeting to do this. Can't make November so OPA will accept schedule for March. Said we could schedule a hearing and adopt resolution declaring intent to form improvement district in their area. It could be as late as in November. Saltarelli then suggested this meeting be held for Directors that are going to vote on this to hear the people. Not necessarily a meeting to vote but just for Directors to get facts and see what people want .and take testimony of people there. Added he had no objection to taking the actions suggested here tonight provided we still have the opportunity to take testimony from people with our staff giving all these facts to the people. Smith agreed staff should give a report there. Peggy McElligott was then recognized and she stated that she was not representing OPA but was Special Bond Counsel. She agreed there should be a hearing in OPA area. Said the next step in annexation procedure callsfor a notice to go to every property owner so would be a good time to notify them of a hearing. Saltarelli then asked why item (g) says "without modification or change"? Peggy a nswered that the Engineer's Report in this instance is purely a technical descriptive report. Does not say what is going to be constructed at what time. It is required as part of the Sanitation District law that you have to have Engineering Report. Can be modified l ater . TLW ·added that final bounda ries of annexation are not fixed here. LAFC has already approved annexation of Lazy B, part of which is going to be changed . Also another annexation that has been approved by LAFC of l~ acres is being taken out of OPA. Said it is still within realm of possibilities to carve out any part of this. Boundaries are subject to adjustment. Numbers are going to change dollar-wise also. Saltarelli then suggested they take the action necessary action this evening and p erhaps at September meeting can set time and place for hearing in OPA . Peggy s tated that she believed after our own hearings on annexation and formation of improvement di s trict, will have to go back to LAFCO for approval. Will be another time factor to extend problems. She recommended that h earings be held rather expeditiously . Smith then stated he would like previous information and letters from City of Orange included in the minutes for this h earing . (See attached) Saltare lli added he thought we should prepare a transcript of questions asked and answered here tonight for the District 7 Board. -5- . . It was then moved that the hearing be closed. Motion seconded. Item 39(g) was then moved and seconded to approve Engineer's Report . Roll call vote was taken. Motion carried -5 ayes and 2 absent. (See also item 41) (40) DISTRICT 7 -Lazy B Golf Course agreement -Annexation No. 55 Smith stated he thought this was the first time that it hasn't been a public agency that we are waiving payments on. Thinks it is entirely wrong and wanted that entered into the record. Absolutely wrong since it is not a public agency. Moved and seconded to approve item. Roll Call vote. Motion carried 4:1 (two absent) (41) DISTRICT 7 -Other business Saltarelli requested that a copy of Tom Woodruff's letter of August 5, 1976, regarding statements of Peggy McElligott to LAFC be forwarded to Executive Director of LAFC and a copy to each Director and Alternate on the Local Agency Formation Commission. Winn advised that it would be done. Saltarelli also indicated that if any Director would like to attend the CASA meeting on behalf of District 7, should notify Mr. Harper immediately. Re OPA hearing, Smith suggested the Santiago School would be a good pla ce to meet. -6-