HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-06-09COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
June 3, 1976
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8) & 11
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9, 1975, 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, C~ili fornia,
will be held at the above hour and date.
Jcretary
Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
DIRECTORS' ORIENTATION MEETING -Wednesday, J-:.me 16, 1976, 5:30 p.m.
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
.~ MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
June 9, 1976 -7:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are now enc losed
with the agenda material, summarizing the bills paid since the May
Joint Board meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 8-a -Approving Change Order No. 1 to Job No . J-6-lB.
In September, 1974, one bid was received for the furnishing
of the equipment and the installation of additional pumping
facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. The Boards
rejected this single bid and instructed the staff to procure the
necessary equipment under separate equipment contracts and sub-
sequently award a contract for the installation of said equipment.
Bids were received concurrently for the furnishing of the engines,
as well as the pumps and gear drives. Later it was discovered
that to mitigate the vibration problems of the engines to be
located on the second floor of the Outfall Booster Station,
22-inches of additional foundation were required for stabilization.
The pump manufacturer quoted .the pump shafts based on a
shorter length, and a change order for the additional 22-inches
is required to meet the final design installation . It is the
staff's recommendation that this change order in the amount of
$11,958.92 for the additional pump extensions be a pprove d.
No. 9-c -Acceptance of Job No. J-6-lC.
This contract to provide two tilting disc check valves for
the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster
Station is now complete. The supplier has furnished the required
equipment under this contract. The action appearing on your agenda
authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion.
No. 9-d -Change Order No. 1 -Brookhurst Street Improvements,
Job No. P2-8-8.
This cooperative street improvement project at Plant No. 2
between the Districts and the City of Hu ntington Beach initially
included in the original bid the installation of street lights,
underground wiring and appurtenant electrical pull boxes. In
Addendum No. 1 to the bid proposal, the street lighting facilities
were deleted at the request of the City because of contractual
difficulties with the Southern California Edison Company. Now
that these contractual agreements have been consuwmated, the
City has requested that the street lights be included in the
project by change order in the amount of $13,600.22. The cost
will be part of the City's responsibility on this project. It
is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that this change order
be approved.
No. 8-e -D.etermining Prevailing Wage Rates for Construction
Work by Outside Contractors.
The State Government Code requires that we adopt, periodically,
a resolution determining the prevailing labor rates for public
works construction contracts. Since t his resolution is quite
lengthy, it is not included in the agenda material although it will
be available for inspection at the meeting. It should be emphasized
that this resolution does not establish wage rates for our employees;
it involves only employees of contractors engaged in construction
work for public projects.
No. 8-f -Financial Report.
Include d with the agenda material is the Distri cts ' Financial
Report for the nine-month period ended March 3 1 st . The Director
of Financ e is recommending several budget trans f ers for reasons
stated in the report. If any Director ha s questions concerning
the Financial Report and the recommended budget transfers, p lease
call either Wayne Sylvester, the Distric~s 1 · Director of Finance,
or Fred Harper, telephone 5 40-2 9 10.
No. 8-g -General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel
at Meetin gs .
For the past several years, the Gene ral Manager ha s been
authoriz ed , on an annual basis, to designate mem b ers of the Board
and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, etc., within the
State, which he believes will be of value to the Districts. It
is recommended that this authorization be renewed.
No. 8-h -AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management,
July 21-23.
The Districts' Director of Finance has b een invited to part i-
cipate in a sc heduled AMSA technical conference on finance and
management for wastewater agencies to be held in Seattle July
21~23. It is the staff's recommendation that the authorization
be given for participation in this meeting.
-2-
No. 8-i -Authorization for Execution of Specified Documents.
From time to time, we are required to submit proof that the
General Manager has authority to execute documents on behalf of
the Districts. The resolution appearing in the agenda specifying
this authorization has been prepared by the General Counsel. It
is our recommendation that the resolution be approved.
No. 9-j -Authorizing Payment of Overtime .for Supervisory
Accounting Personnel.
During the past month, key accounting employees have been
absent from work due to extended illnesses. This situation has
resulted in the need for other accounting personnel to work over -
time. Since this particular time of the year ·requires the closing
of the books as well as the preparation of the budge ts for the
coming year, we are requesting authority to pay overtime to
supervisory personnel to avoid hiring additional people on a
temporary basis. This requested authorization will expire
September 30th .
District No. 1
No. 8-k -Document Maps for Sewer Right-of-Way .
The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to
verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity
of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems
within the District. Since the work involved little professional
judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order
for the work as outlined. · The fees submitted from the five firms
were as follows:
(1) $1,091
(2) $2,400
(3) . $4,000
(4) $9,000
(5) $12,487
The staff had estimated that the cost for these outside
services would be approximately $2,000.
The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental
Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in
the amount of $1,091. They have indicated that they are completely
aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee as sub-
mitted. It is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that the
proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be
accepted.
-3-
Districts Nos. 1 and 7
No. 8-1 -Environmental Impact Assessment for Raitt Street
Trunk Sewer Construction.
The actions appearing on the agenda initiate the preparation
of a draft Environmental Impact Report relative to the proposed
construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewe r. The trunk will
connect to the Districts ' Sunflower facility and will cost about
$1 .5 million. This facility is includ ed in the Districts ' Master
Plans.
District No. 2
No. 8 (m)-(n). Acceptance of Contracts Nos . 2 -14-3A and
2-14-4A.
These contracts were for the furnishing of manhole frames
and covers for Contracts Nos. 2 -1 4 -3 and 2-14-4, which are
presently und e r construction . The supplier has furnished all
of the material requ ired under the contract . The staff recommends
acceptance of the work and authorization to file a Not ic e of Com-
pletion.
District No. 5
No. 8 -q -Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Back Bay
Trunk Sewer.
. .
The actions appearing on the' agenda rel ative to the preparation
of a n egative environmental declarati on for the construction of
the Back Bay Sewer (east side) is pursu ant to the District 's guidelines
impl ementing the Env ironmental Qual i ty Act of 1970 . Because the
area tributary to the sewer is pre sently 85% developed or approved
for development, the staff is rec ommending the preparation of a
n egative environmental dec laration.
No. 8 -r -Authorization to Advertise and Receive Bids for
Purchase of 24 -Inch Ductile Iron Pipe for Construction of the
Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 5 -20A .
The District 's staff , working with the Department of Fish
and Gam e , have agreed that no construction will be done during
the migratory foul breeding and storm seasons, generally October
15 to March 1. In order to construct this facility prior to
October 15, it is necessary to procure the ductile iron pipe re-
quired for this job because of the long lead time required for
manufactur ing this mater ial. It is anticipated that the con-
tract or will cow.rnence work on or about August 15th . It is
proposed that this pipe be purchased and furni shed to the
-4-
contractor to meet this tight construction schedule. It is
recommend ed that the Board authorize the advertisement and
receipt of bids for 8,600 feet of pipe at an engineer's estimate
of $250,000. It is recommended that biITs for this material b e
received on July 6th and award be made by the Board at the regular
July meeting.
District No. 6
No. 8-s -Document Maps for Sewer Right of Way.
The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to
verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity
of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems
within the District. Since the work involved little professional
judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order
for the work as outlined. The fees submitted from the five firms
were as follows:
(1) $1,521
(2) $3,699
(3) $4,000
(4) $7,500
(5) $12,487
The staff had estimated that the cost for these putside services
would be approximately $2,000 .
The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental
Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in
the amount of $1,521 . The firm has indicated that t hey are com-
pletely aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee
as submitted and it is, therefore, the staff 's recommendation that
the proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be
accepted. ·
District No. 7
No. 8-t -Initiation of Proceeding s for Proposed Annexation
No. 52.
The staff has r e viewed the proposed annexation of 1.38 acres
located at 20202 Amapola Street in the vicinity o f Orange Park
Boulevard and Amapola. Th is is an existing single family develop -
ment in the City of Orange and it is the staff's rec ommendation
that Resolution No. 76-108-7 authorizing initiation of annexation
proceedings be approved.
No. 9-u -Ordering Annexation No. 49, Tract No . 8306 .
In October, 1975, the Board authorized the initiation of
annexation proceedings for Trac t No . 8306 (City of Orange) to
annex approximate l y 11 acres in the vicinity of Santiago Road
-5-
extending to a point westerly of Santiago Creek . The property
will be divided into single family residential lots and the
wastewater discharge will be consistent with the flows anticipated
by the District's Master Plan. We now have received approval from
the Local Agency Formation Commission and the proponent has paid
the District's annexation fees. The staff recommends adoption of
Reso lution No . 76-109-7, ordering annexation.
No. 8 -v -Acc eptance of Sew e r Easement .
Resolution No. 7 6 -110-7 accepts an easement for a loc a l sewer
constructed in a privat-e street in the vicinity of La Co lina Drive
and Brownin g Avenue. It is recommended that the action authorizing
acceptance of this easement , at no cost to the District , be approved .
-No. 8-w -Acceptanc e of -Sewer -Eas emen t from LerneP Oil
Company-,-Inc . , Contract No . 7 -4 A.
It has been recent ly discovered that when a subtrunk sewer ,
Co ntract No. 7-4A, ~as constructed through a private right of way
betwe en El Camino Real and "B" Street in the City of Tustin in
1963 , the proper sewer easement was not obtained . The staff and
General Counsel have met with the attorneys f or the Oil Company,
and it has been mutually agreed that a fair market va lue for th is
easement is $1,800 . It is, therefore, recommended that Resolution
No. 76-111 -7 be approved authorizing acceptance of this easement
and payment to Lerner Oil Company, Inc., in the amount of $1 ,800.
Joint Boards
Nos. 10 and 11 -Report of the Executive Committee .
The Committee met on June 1st and enclosed for the Directors
is a written report of their discussions and rec ommended it ems for
considerat ion by the Boards .
No. 12 -Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman .
As provided in the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure, nominations
for thes e two offices are made at the regular June meeting , with
elections to take place at the July regular Joint Board meeting . For
the new Directors' information, we have included in the supporting
document s section of the agenda material, an excerpt from the Rules
of Procedure for Meetings relative to the election of the Chairman
and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization .
No. 13 -Hearing on Proposed Conflict of In terest Code for
District Directors and Specified Emplo y ees .
Pur suant to the Boards ' authorization in May, a public hear ing
i s scheduled Wednesday evening on the proposed Conflict of Interest
-6-
Code for the County Sanitation Districts. Copies of the Code
have been mailed to all Directors and affected employees. As
of this date, no written com.ments have been received. If any
Director has any questions concerning the Code's provisions,
please call the Districts' General Counsel, Tom Woodruff , (714)
835-6212.
No. 14 -Amendment to NASA Contract, JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant
Facility.
At the April 14th Board meeting, the Board amended the
original contract entered into with National Aeronaut ics and
Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory of California
Institute of Technology to provide the necessary services for
the design, start-up and operational phases of the 1 -MGD Pi lot
Plant Facility from $280,000 to $333,726. There wa s an apparent
oversight of a $20,000 effort made in April and May, 1975, which
should have been considered in this revised contract amount.
Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter from the Pasadena
Office of NASA detailing the oversight by not inc l ud ing this
$20,000 effort. It is the staff's recommendation that the amended
contract amount with NASA should be adjuste d to $353,726.
Districts 2,3,5,7,11
No .. 15 -Amending Annexation Policies.
The staff is reco~mending that the provisions for payment
of the annexation fees be amended to read that the date of payment
of annexation fees govern the amount of the fee payable. Currently,
the fee is determined as of the date of the formal annexation
approval by the Board of Directors. This creates problems, in
that, on July 1st of each year, the annexation fee changes, based
on the assets and liabilities of the Districts on that date; there-
fore any pending annexations are subject to increases in fees. The
recommended change in language would permit a proponent to pay
currently-established fees at the time of application for annexa-
tion. The staff recommends the adoption of the runending resolu-
tions listed on the agenda.
District No. 2
No. 19 -Acquisition of Permanent Easement for Realignment
of the Yorba Linda Force Main.
During the course of construction of Contract No. 2 -16-2, the
Yorba Linda Force Main from Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard ,
the contractor encountered a large storm drain which interfe res
with the construction of the sewer as originally proposed . This
-7-
' , •1.
obstruction has forced the realignment of the sewer to a position
which requires acquisition of a permanent easement on pr ivat e
property . The staff has negotiated with Calprop Corporation for
the required easement and recommends payment in the amount of
$7 ,000 for the right of way .
District No . 8
No. 28 -Substitution of South Coast County Water District
as a Member Agency of District No . 8.
The General Counsel is recommending that the Board adopt
Resolution No. 76 -112 -8 , confirming substitution of the South
Coast County Water District as a member agency of District No . 8
in place of the South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to the
provisions of the Health and Safety Code, Section 4730 . This
action is the resu lt of the consolidation of the San i tary District
with the Water District .
District No. 7
No. 33 -Request for Annexation -Lazy B Golf Course.
The District has received an annexation request from the
owners of Lazy B Estates, Inc ., in the Orange Park Acres area
lying between Randall Street and Am a pola Avenue, consisting of
approximat ely 108 acres . The owners have requested that 50.51
acres of the annexation be exempt from annexation fees because
the areas will not be developed to contribute any sewage flow to
the sanitary sewer system . The re quested "exempted area 11 will
be a golf course , driving range and equestrian trail . In 1 972 ,
a similar requ es t was granted by the District No . 2 Board to the
City of Anaheim to exempt a public golf course in the Anaheim
Hills area. The exemption agreement provided that in the event
any of the exempted land requ i red sewer service , the area to be
develop ed would be subject to fees equal to then appl icable
District annexation charges and any other fees that may be in
effect at that time .
Th e staff is requesting the Board 's direction in this matter .
Because of the private ownership status of the request ed exempt
property, the staff feels this would be extremely di ff icult to
administer and to collect fees due the District if and when the
land use would change on any portion of the 50 acres .
-8-
Fred A. Harper
Gen eral Manager
DISTRICTS 3 & ll
rITMS ON
SU PPLE MENTA L AG ENDA
FILE •......••.•...••••
LE TIER •···••·•··•·••
A/C .•.. TKLR ••.•
--····-···-····--·--·
•••••••••••••••••••••••O•
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from
the following cities regarding e lections of mayors and appointment
of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City · District Active Al ternate
Fullerton 3 Frances Wood Robert Ward*
Huntington Beach 3 Ron Patt i nson Ha r riett Wieder*
11 Harriett Weider*
11 Ron Shenkman
Los Alamitos 3 Phillip E. Cox* Charles E. Sylvia
Seal Beach 3 Thomas Bl ackman* Russell B. Gray
·'
II
BOAnos OF DIRECTons
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
ADJGUP.~:r.~E:ffS POSTED.:
MEET I NG DATE COMP & MILEAGE ..... ~ .... ..
FILES SET UP ...... a--.'. ...... .
JU ME 9 1976 7 30 p M ·RESOLur:o~;s crnr1FiED .. ~ ll .) -: I I
LETiE~S f:RiTIEN ............. .
MINUTES WRiTTEN ...... ~.
THE JO I NT CHA I RMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DI RECTOR MINUTES f-ILED ............... -
W I TH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY
OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
~ See supplemental agenda
•
(5) EACH DISTRICT
(6)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 May 12, 1976 regular
District 2 May 12, 1976 regular
District 3 May 12, 1976 regular
District 5 May l?, 1976 regular
District 6 May 12, 1976 regular
District 7 May 12, 1976 regular
District 8 April 14, 1976 :regular
District 11 May 12, 1976 regular, and ~
~~lit
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
~ Joint Chairman
General Manager
(c) General Counsel
'•
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Ron CALL vorr .......... -Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D"
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) II B"
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO: ·6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "C"
DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C"
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS I 8(A) THROUGH 8( w)
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall he considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
·,
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
FILE __....._... __ _..
~
LETTER ........................ ".
A/C •••• TKLR .... __ ... ________
------···-· ...
FILE ---······---.
~~ -----· ...
A/C .... TKLR ··-~&Q~~
~·~
._.,...
.,,~ .~ '• . -~···
Fi LE ---··-------......
~···""\ ..;:
\._ LETTER ...............
A/C •••. TKLR •••• ~------
-----~
FILE ................ -·--
LETTER .................... -
A/C .••. TKLR -·
-----------
~I~P
FILE •..•.....••.....••
LETTER ·······-·····
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
···-··-······-------· _____________ ...
FILE·······-
LETTER ···-·······-
A/C _ •• TK1.R -·
-·-----------
------·····-----
FILE ...... ~·-···
tmER ..•.••••••.•••
A/C •••• TKLR ••••
ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Pump and Drive Units for the
Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping
Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, authorizing an addition
of $11,958.92 to the contract with McCalla Bros. to increase
base plate elevation. See page "E"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-95, approving Addendum No. 1
to the purchase contract with McCalla Bros. for Pump and Drive
Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall
Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, in form approved
by the General Counsel, to provide for payment of sales tax
directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California,
and amending progress payment provisions (does not affect total
contract price) ·See page "F"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-96, accepting Tilting Disc
Check Valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean
Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. _2, Huntington Beach, California,
Job No. J-6-lC, as complete; and authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion. ~ee page "G"
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in
the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, authorizing an
addition of $13,600.22 to the contract with Fleming Construction
for trenching and underground vaults in connection with City of
Huntington Beach improvements incorporated into said contract,
Districts to be reimbursed by City for said cost. See page "H"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-93, determining the
prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts'
construction contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding
Resolution No. 75-85
(f) Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report
of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31,
1976; and approving recommended budget transfers (mailed with
agenda material)
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings,
conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within
the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value
to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses
incurred
(h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to
attend and participate in the AMSA Technical Conference on Finance
and Management of Wastewater Agencies to be held in Seattle,
Washington on July 21-23, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement
for travel, meals, -1odging-and--±ncidenta1-expenses· incurred
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
(me .. ~: .. r;~.,.,,,.....-ALL DISTRICTS (continued)
(LE1TER .. vf.~~-(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-94, authorizing Fre d A. Harper,
A/c •••• TK~~ •••• General Manager, to sign all contracts and documents not required ~.L:?!--~~_:,Vl{ to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. See
----·-page "I"
FILE ................ ..
LE1iER .....•....•.••
A/C ...• TKLR ••••
(§) ... :::: ...... _
~'?.LLETTER ············-
A/C .•.. TK LR ••• -~---~ ___ .............. ..
~ .. .V.'. ... ~
U:TTER ••....••......
A/C .... TKLR ....
--·--·--··----
'...-.-····--··-
FI LE ••••.••.••..••.•••
(j) Consideration of motion granting temporary a uthority for payment
of overtime to Districts' Principal Accountant up to September 30,
1976, due to extended illness of other accounting staff personnel
DISTRICT 1
(.k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for
right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk
sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,091.00 . See page "J"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(1) Considerations of actions relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer
pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Impleme nting the
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as am en ded:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "K"
LETTE~ ~~~~!..-' (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare draft
Environmental Impact Report relative to Raitt Street
Trunk Sewer
---·-~·--·--···--···"'
FllE __ ...,..
LETTER ·--
A~··-
···---------...
FI LE" ........... -.... .
LETTER ............ _
~'-~.Z
--•oUOUUooo•-
FILE>-... ~ ...•.
LETTER ... ~ ..••
A/C .... TKLR ••••
Fl.) ... ~.: .. '(;/""'
~J.. ......... -
A/C .... TKLR ••••
,,,.,.,.. _________ .. ___ _
DISTRICT 2
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-105-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames , Contract
No .. 2-14-3A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion . See page "L"
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-106-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer;Ma nhole Covers and Frames, Contract
No. 2-14-4A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion. See page "M"
DISTRICT 3
(o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Solomon Shapiro, dated May 20, 1976, in the amo unt of $50,000.00
in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor,
Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2,
and refer to the contractor and District's liab ility insurance
carrier for appropriate action
(p) Consideration of motion to deny leave to file late claim by
Karen L. Morton for lack of sufficient showing of excusable
neglect relative to a claim in connection with construction of
the Knot-t-Int-erceptor.,--a-P..ortion-of -Reach 7, ··Contract .No ··--3-20-2 ,. -...
as recommended by the General Counsel
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(8)
f:t'E. __ _
LETTER·····----
A/C •... TKLR -
-----
FILE ·······---~
LEmR ··-·-··-·····
A/C '..:." •• TKLR •••• ?~~~,
~e ... :~.~··········
LETTER ·······-·····
~C •••• TKlR • .,.. ~~~;~.(.
-'"""· , fFILE ~--·-'-----nc:r
LETTER .l.'::..·-··-
A/C ... 7 ·· ..
~--········
..,_....._.-··-
A/C •... TlClR ••••
Fi LE ..••.••..•••.•••••
~-s."is ~~-~Ylf'
A/C .... TKLR ••••
@:---~-----.-.:-z;_ __ _
~ "\/""" ~R_.-+·-··-
A./C .... TKLR -
-~
f.U: .. , ... le.--···~
---·· v LETTER ·-····-····-...._ __ .-
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 5
(q) Consideration of actions relative to Back Bay Trunk Sewer
(East Side) pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing
the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "N"
(2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare
negative declaration declaring that the Bay Bay Trunk
Sewer (East Side) will not have a significant effect on
the environment and directing the filing of notice thereof
(r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids
for purchase of 24-inch Ductile Pipe for the Back Bay Trunk
Sewer (East Side), Contract No. 5-20A
DISTRICT 6
(s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for
right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk
sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,521.00. See page "0" ----
DISTRICT 7
(t) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-108-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1.3834 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Street
and Handy Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 52 -St. Amand Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(u) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-109-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 11.165 acres to the District in
the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extended to a point
westerly of Santiago Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 49 -Tract
No. 8306 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-110-7, authorizing acceptance
of Grant of Easement from La Colina Associates, a California
Limited Partnership, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer
service in connection with a sewer line southwesterly of the
intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue, at no cost
(w)
to the District. See page "P"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-111-7, approving and authorizing
execution of agreenent with Lerner Oil Company, Inc. for right of
way in connection with Contract No. 7-3A-4A, Sub-Trunks; authorizing
payment in the amount of $1,800.00; and accepting Grant of Easement
in connection with said right of way. See page "Q"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
-5-
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to
receive and file the Committee's written report
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
''1E ·••••·••·•••••··•• Committee:
LETI'ER ••••••••••••••
Ale .... TKLR .... (a) Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget:
_______ .. __ _
-----··--.....
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
Consideration of motion approving 1976-77 personnel
requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 76-97 amending
Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-167 (Copy of
resolution in Directors' .meeting folders)
FILE ···············-_, (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77
Joint Operating Budget LEmR ---~ROLL CALL VOTE ...... :.~.--
A/C .... TKtR -r_ __ .
·······-··-··-® ROLL CALL VOTE ........ __
Consideration ·of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction)
FILE ~-.;~-~-~· .. ,
LETTER ···········-·
(4) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance
to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor
A/C ••.. TKtR .... ('i\ 1 ·~
for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30,
1976, and declaring.that such certification shall comply with
the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures
for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1976-77
budgets are adopted by the respective Districts
r FILE •• ../!........... (b)
'-· LETI'ER •.•••••••••••• Af~ ... TKLR !h \ $ ~. 0 'l/t . ----·--·-
. 1-,, U . v-· (c) ~········ ........ .,
LETTER ............ ,,
A/C .... TKlll .. ,, /Y\ )~
--ftt!-···············~~~
LETTER ............ ..
A/C .... TICLR ... .
. , "r v.,A ,· ' ·• ~ ,-L~! ... L-.... ( e)
~-·M1:s ~t~·~~:
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive
bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for Security
Monitoring System, Specification No. PW-054, for an amount
not to exceed $13,000 for installation and maintenance for the first
year, plus cost of annual maintenance thereafter
Consideration of motion approving concept of value engineering
procedures relative to the design of 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with Federal and·
State guidelines, to provide cost-effective design of said facility
Discussion re amending connection charge ordinances in Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 to permit waiver of all or portion of connection
fees under special circumstances.
Consideration of motion approving nominations of Frances Wood, Chairman,
District No. 3, (member) and Fred A. Harper, General Manager, (alternate)
as the Districts' representatives on the Southern California Association
of Governments 208 Program Committee
.....,,, (12) ALL DISTRICTS
Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page -----"R"
-6-
(13) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8 & 11
Hearing on proposed Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County:
(a) Open hearing ~· . ..!57
(b) Report of General Counsel
(c) Actions to date:
(1) Resolution No.· 76-90, setting time and place of hearing adopted
on May 12, 1976 by District$ Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
(2) Notice (resolution) published May 21, 1976 (Districts 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11) Santa Ana Register
(3) Notice published May 28, 1976 (District 8) Daily Pilot
(4) Notice of hearing, resolutuion and copy of Code mailed to
affected parties on May 28, 1976 or June 1, 1976
Fl~ . .:··:·;····:~·,··v1 (d)' _Writ-ten __ CO~
(. LEmR --~~-~ .
~c ~~<.J(e) Oral comments, if any . \. ._..,_.o .
,___ (f) Close hearing q '. oq
Roll Call Vote or cast (g~ Consideration of Resolution No. 76-99 adopting Conflict of Interest
Unanimous Ballot f{\ \ti} Code. See page "S"
FILE ••••••••.•• TI4) ALL DISTRICTS
LmER ············-
: •.• JKLR ·:.:· ,... (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from National
~~-~1Lk.> 1 Aeronautics and Space Administration, dated May 25, 1976, in ~~"'f~L.N\rs,---, connection with JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility. See page "T"
~(b))Consideration of Resolution No. 76-98, authorizing amendment to the
V ~c t contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re
Roll Call ote or as C S . · h · f · f unanimous Ballot \ (.. JPL-A T process, increasing t e maximum amount or services rom
FILE ............ _
(VI. \C\ $333, 726 to $353, 726 for additional pre-design work. See page "U"
·---···" LETTER ........... ~ (15)/ DISTRICTS 2,3,5, 7 & 11
Consideration of the following resolutions amending Section 1, Subsection (b),
of the annexation policy resolutions of the respective Districts providing
for the change indicated below:
A/C .... TKLR -..._ -_.,
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
ml s (a)
M/" (b)
M / ~ (c)
i\t\I s Cd)
Al/ s (e)
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 7
DISTRICT 11
Resolution No.
76-100-2
76-101-3
76-102-5
76-103-7
76-104-11
Amending Resolution No.
75-42-2
75-43-3
75-15-5
75-44-7, as amended
75-49-11
Delete sentence: "The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the
annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per
acre hereinabove established."
Add sentence: "The date of payment of annexation acreage fee to the
District shall govern the amount of the fee per acre
hereinabove established."
-7-
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DI~TRICT 1
oi~~n-s~merrtal agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn q: 11
(19) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-107-2, authorizing acceptance
Roll Call Vote or Cast of Grant of Easement from Calprop Corporation for a permanent easement
UniJ)imous Ballot • • • h h l · f y b L · d F · (f ~-··········-in connection wit t e rea ignment o or a in a orce Main rom
~~---------"~]~ Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard), Contract No. 2-16-2, and authorizing
A/C ••.• TKLR •••• payment in the amount of $7,000.00 for said easement.
o.... •• A J:" ... ¥ ~ ~CtQ P.i..., -trlri.li." ... , CJJW-t.l.v........, ~~----· (20) \DISTRICT 2 ----1 --·r ~-\Other bus ·. ess and commurri<;ations_.o>'-SUppl emental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn (/;)_])
(22) ~!STRICT 3 ----·-~
Q.:t~iness and communications or supp-lem~nda i terns' if any
(23) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn frJ,o
(24) !;>!STRICT 5 "B~j,_nes ~1ons o-r-supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·..]...D
(26) DIS?TRICT 6
Ot~s---nd upplemental agenda items, if any
FILE ···············~·· . 2 7)
~~. .M"--L ·{J~ L 11 -(
AJC •... TKLR •.••
~--~8)
......... -.. ·--··-···-
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanim ous Ballot
(29)
(30)
(31)
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn CJ~
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's memorandum
dated June 3, 1976; and approving Resolution No. 76-112-8, confirming
the substitution of South Coast Cm,J.nt atet District;, as a member agency
of the Districts in place of South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to
the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730. See pages "V"
and "W"
·~mental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to adjourn q1':;t.,:i._
DISTJlikT 11 -. ~
Other bus:±nes-s-a:ru( communicat~_p.1e~ agenda items, if any
-8-
•
(32) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn t/:c:L)
(33) DISTRICT 7
FILE ·······-··-··-(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Lazy B
LElTER ·--fl) )~states, Inc. for annexation of approximately 107. 876 acres
A/C ~ of territory to the District in the Orange Park Acres area between _=-sl. d Randall Street and Amapola Avenue and refer to staff. See page ·, "X"
---·-··-
(34)
(35)
(b) Discussion of Lazy B Estates, Inc. request for waiver of fees for
portion of proposed annexation _ ~\,S). ~ \~ \ '\. ~ ,
DISTRICT 7
Ot coiilliruni-cations-Dr~1.-agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn t/: c:/3
-9-
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8(f)
Hay 26, 1976
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
of Orange County! California
.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT:
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.O. EOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALlfORNIA 92708
(714) 5-40-2910
(714) 962-2411
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1976
Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1976,
pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972.
·The statements surrunarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first
nine months of the 1975-76 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined
1975-76 budgets for all Districts is $98.9 mill ion, of which approximately 82% is for capital expenditures for
f~cilities improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the
several Districts are as follows:
Budgeted Revenue
Average
Percent of
Total Budget
1974-75 1975-76
Tax Revenue 19%
Federal & State Construction Grants 22
Connection Fees 2
Other Revenues 6
Carry-over from Accumulated
Construction Reserves -2.!._
100%
19%
15
2
11
Budgeted Expenditures
District Facilities Expansion
and Reserves
Joint Works Expansion and
Reserves
Debt Service
Share of Joint Operations
District Operations, Maintenance,
and Other
Average
Percent of
Total Bud9et
1914-75 1975-76
4li% 45%
41 37
4 4
5 5
6 _9
100% 100%
Included in each District's statement is a surrunary of the above major income and expense categories and an
itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects, and respective share of the joint works expansion.
Separate staff reports relative to the current status on individual construction projects are included each
month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting.
Except for inventory control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. The inventory system is being phased
in conjunction with the move to our new warehouse and establishment of revised warehousing and purchasing
procedures which we expect to complete in the near future. The staff is· undertaking a review of the on-line
·computer system to assure maximum utilization of its capabilities, consistent with cost effectiveness.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual
basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '75-76 which were accrued in 1974-75 are not
reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased
to discuss them with you at your convenience.
Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained well within their respective 1975-76
total budget allocations. However, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were
approved, budget transfers in certain categories will be necessary. The budget transfers which are more fully
described in this report, and summarized on the last page, are recommended.
CASH INVESTMENTS
Earned interest of approximately $2.4 million from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (prhnarily~
capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first nine
months of fiscal 1975-76. As of March 31st, approximately 96i of the Districts' cash funds were investeo in
short-term government securities or time deposits as shown belm-1. The balance of cash on hand was earning
interest in conmingled investments with the County Treasurer's office.
Amount Percent
Cash on Hand $ 1,881 ,470 4. 1
Investments in Gov't Securities 44,545,738 ~
Total (A 11 Districts) $46,427,208. 100.0%
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-
o~ned treatment and disposal facilities.
Salaries and Wages -As previously reported, funds were not included in the budget for salary increases
granted by the Boards pursuant to agreements with employee groups. However, because of payroll savings
resulting from unfilled positions, the increases will be funded from current year payroll savings and
expenses will be maintained well within the budget allocation.
Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms,
all of which will be within the budget allocation.
Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products
have been experienced. The Districts' have a cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel
fuel with the County of Orange. Barring further increases, the budget allocation should suffice.
Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is general I~ during the first quarter.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to place this coverage be~ause of the reluctance of carriers to
insure governmental agencies. Premiums have doubled in the past two years and we expect them to continue
to rise. Budget allocation will be tight but should be adequate.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Our chlorine
contract expired in December and although last year's chlorine unit costs increased 55%, the new unit
price bid was down and expenditures this·year should therefor be less than anticipated.
Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has
precluded the necessity of using chemicals at the rate originally anticipated and yet enable the Districts
to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Additionally, we have been able to obtain improved
quality chemicals at lower cost which has reduced the cost. Needless to say, there will be funds to
carryover and apply to next year's budget requirements.
Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge hauling and EDP services. Because of esca-
lating costs and increasing volumes, the Boards were previously advised that a budget transfer for this
account might be necessary. However, at this time it appears.as if the allocation will be sufficient.
Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel's fees and audit fees paid through March 31st.
Funds for work on revenue program will be carried over to next year.
Printing and Publications -Reproduction policies have been changed to m1n1m1ze costs. However, con-
tinuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with increased volume and
"paper work" required by other agencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. As previously
reported, a budget transfer for this account in the amount of $1 ,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account
is desired in the event it is necessary.
Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and
replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations.
Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue
to have a significant impact on this itern, however, absent major equipment failures, the current year
allocation will not be exceeded.
Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research "-""
Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first nine months of
1975-76. Because our auditors have now determined that certain cost associated with the evaluation of
the JPL-ACTS project originally thought payable from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund should be paid
from Joint Operating Funds, a budget transfer of $2,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is recom-
mended.
-2-
Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has
Increased substantially due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is
from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. Prices have stabilized
during the past year after a rapid escalation when oil prices increased substantially, and thus consider-
able carryover funds will be available for next year.
Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere. Major item in this account is freight-in. During
the year it was n~cessary to obtain a large shipment of chemicals from the Mid-west urgently needed for
our solids handling operation. This material is generally available on the West Coast. Because of this,
our freight expenditures for the current year will be higher than normal and a transfer of $4,000 from
the Chemical Coagulants Account is, therefor, recommended.
Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account
balance from the previous year.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expa~ding and improving the Districts• presently-owned treatment and disposal
facilities and represents an average of 41% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1975-76. During
the first nine months, $12.5 million was expended on joint works t•eatment and disposal facilities expansion,
primarily on the $32.5 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 1, approxi-
mately 84% of which will be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial
statements of the respective Districts.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each
·respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes -Approximately 61% of the budgeted property taxes for 1975-76 have been received through March 31st.
Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant funds received during the period amount to $9.9
million, all on the 46 MGD Activated Sludge project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2%
of 11 approved11 treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that payments will be limited to 80%
of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The staff .has previously advised the
Directors that our revenue program, even though it has been used as a 11 model 11 by the State, is unacceptable
because it includes ad valorem taxes for operation, maintenance 'and capital recovery charges. The Boards
are aware· that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, are vigorously
supporting HR 9560 which would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem taxes,
and result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts' taxpayers. Passage of the amendment
appears somewhat in doubt at this time and it will therefor be necessary for the Boards to consider adoption
of a program implementing "user charges". to assure receipt of the full grant allocation. Prohibition of
ad valorem taxes will also have a substantial affect on long-range funding programs of the Districts.
Connection Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became
effective in Districts 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. District 5 revenues have dropped off considerably (only
23% of last year•s budget was received) and collections this year are running behind budget. District 7
fees have also decreased substantially over the past two years. District 2 and District 3 are about as
projected; however, some cities are not remitting fees to the District on schedule and therefor receipts
compared to budget may be misleading. Further, the budgets for these two Districts are approximately 54Z
and 25% respectively, of the original annual forecast made by the financial consultant.
Other Revenue -Except as footnooted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of
capacity rights.
District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk
sewers. The average 1975-76 budget for this item is 45% for the seven Districts. However, this average
is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the
lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts
during the three quarters was $12,998,733. District 7's Facilities Revolving Fund budget reflected pro-
jected receipts of approximately $1. 1 million from the Cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin and the Costa
Mesa Sanitary District pursuant to proposed amendments to the agreements with those agencies for the
collection of connection fees. Because terms of the amendments have not yet been worked out, these funds
have not been received, and it is therefor necessary to request that the authorized transfer of funds
from the District 7 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACO) to the Facilities Revolving Fund be increased
from $483,000 to $983,000 to be allocated from the ACO Fund's Facilities Improvements and Reserve Account.
Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities
expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation
bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 million.
Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treat-
ment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each
District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details).
-3-
District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of Individual Districts' general operating
expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. District
7 should transfer $200 to their Memberships account to cover increased proportional share of AMSA and CASA~
dues. Last November the Boards adopted a policy with regard to uncollectable accounts. Pursuant to this
new policy, it is necessary to make the transfers indicated to provide for bad debts authorized for write-off.
JOIHT OPERATING FUND
From the Account To the Account Amount
Chemical Coagulants $7,000
Printing &
Publications $1,000
Research &
Monitoring 2,000
Other Expenses 4,000 ---
$7,000
DISTRICT FUNDS
Dist. No. Fund From the Account
-
Oper
3 Oper
3 ACO
7 Oper
7 ACO
11 ACO
Unappropriated
Reserve
un·appropri ated
Reserve
Faci 1t i es Ext.
Reserve
Uhappropriated
Reserve
Faci 1 it i es Ext.
Reserve
Facilities Ext.
Reserve
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
-4-
To the Account
Unco I lectab le
Accounts
Uncollectable
Accounts
Uncollectable
Accounts
Memberships
Transfer to
Faci 1. Rev.
Uncollectable
Accounts
Uncollectable
Accounts
Amount
$ soo
1 so -
~ so -
1 200 -
$SOO, 100 --
$500,000
100 -
$500,100 --
$ 100
'-"'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW
9 Months Ended 3-31-76
REMAINING BUDGET
1975-76 YEAR TO DATE J~UDGET
Sil.LA RIES, 1111 GES & BENEFITS
Sn la rie :.=; & \'18 ge s
Employee Bcmefits
.Sub-total Payroll
Less: C.h[-1rgebacks to Dists & CORF
Net Joint Operating Payroll
MATERIALS, 8liPPLIE8 & SERVICES
Gasoline, 0-r.L & Fuel
Insurance
Office Expense
Operating Expense
Chlorine·~ Odor Control Chemicals
Chemical Coagulants
Other Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
Professional Services
Printing & Publicationc.
Rents & Lenses--Equipment
Repairs & Maintenance
Research & Monitoring
Travel, Meeting & Training
Utilities
Other Exper:ses
Prior Years Expenses
Total Material & Supplies
TOTJ\L JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
Less: Revenues
NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
GALLONAGE Cl!ARGE'8
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
FLOW IN
MILLION GALS
5, 381 MG
15,232
15,970
2,717
. i;714
~,039
_3,389
48,442 MG
3,205,665
609,161
3,814,826
1,100,000
2, 714,826
60,000
. 45' 000
25,000
187,000
320,000
127,000
88,000
74,000
30,000
26,000
325,000
154,500
17,000
870,000
19,000
20,000
2,387,500
5,102,326
250,000
4,852,326
I
2,063,770
346,165
2,409,935
764,313
1,645,622
32,544
39,822
~4,806
911124
53,139
52,401
56,402
25,164
22,514
12,949
220,995
110, 834
9,517
389,495
14,852
14,464
1,161,022
2,806,644
228,496
2,578,148
GALLONAGE
CHARGE
286,384
810,667
849,945
144,602
144,443
161,740
180,367
2,578,148
1,141,895
262,996
1,404,891
335,687
1,069,204
27 ,456 .
5,178
10,194
95,876
266,861
74,599
31,598
48,836
7,486
13,051
104,005
43,666
7,483
480,505
4,148
5,536
1,226,478
2,295,682
21,504
2,274,178
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1975-76
Budget
1,215,590
1,412,000
37,000
335,457
1,985,000
4,434,738
93,888(1)
590,566
63,350(1)
FKCILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS:
Dyer Road Trunk Improv~ments
· Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPl.fENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
4
l,'766,368
21,657
4,241,700
11,593
13,709
5,660,552
11,715,583
Year to Date
4,608,259
749,192
941,702
27,377
238,279
6,564,809
-0-
1,186,074
87,456
285,691
21,557
1,580,778
4,984,031
1975-7-6
Additions
1,186,074
1,186,074
(i) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
~ Remaining
Budp..;et
ll66' 398
470,298
9,623
97,178
1, 985' o.oo
3,248,664
6,432
304,875
.4;1, 7 93
Balance
3-31-76
4
2' 952' 4·4 2
21, 657.
4,241,700
11,593
13,7ng
5,660,~
12,901,657
...,,,
COUNTY SANITATION DI.STRICT NO. 2
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
o Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Jo'int Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
5,264,912
4,442,000
829,000
7,415,808
19,268,424
10,657,644
553,982(1)
1,523;173
217,700(1)
FACILITIE& EXPANSION
Balance
6-30-75
CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS:
Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects 251,431
Yorba Linda Pump Station 324,094
Carbon Canyon Interceptors 1,600,596
Kraemer Interceptor 155,135
Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Intercepotr 1,410,689
Other Projects 48!!7~8
3,790,713
Share of Joint Works Expansion 5,554,102
COMPLETED PROPERTYJ PLANT & EQUIPft!ENT:
Land and Property Rights 315,333
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 24,729,699
Treatment Facilities 1,186
Disposal Facilities · 33,172
General Plant and Administrative ·
Facilities 33,582
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities 17,798,828
Total Property Plant & Equipment 52,256,615
' .
13,915,782
3,198,730
2,961,053
662,984
3,415,234
24,153,783
4,020,067
3,729,445
510,566
808,633
129,652 -
9,198,363
14,955,420
197 5-7-6
Additions
2,799,448
444,493
3,971
474,096
35,379
262,680
4,020,067
3,729,445
7,749,512
· (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
2,066,182
1,480,947
166,016
4,000,574
15,248,357
6,928,199
43,416
714,540
88,048
Balance
3-31-76
3,050,879
768,587
1,604,567
629,231
1,446,068
311,448
7,810,780
9,283,547
315,333
24,729,699
1,186
33,172
33,582
17,798,828
. 60,006,127
"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
~ Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
7,437,449
5,183,000
629,000
1.,073,000
18,258,550
8,841,250
776,546(1)
1,664,462
424,300(1)
· FAC-ILIT-IES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Knott Interceptor Projects
Imperial Relief Interceptor
Westside Relief Interceptor Projects
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
C0~1PLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPftfENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
7,091,769
844,530
131,870
3,685
8,071,854
6,121,797
266", 131
23,833,572
15,036
28,419
52,006
19,618,078
58,006,893
15,857,6Lt5
4·,565,819
3,263,708
993,638
699,468
25,380,278
8,213,720
4,110,638
710,928
847,810
169,637
14,052,733
11,327,545
1975-7-6
Additions
6,664,576
376
1,488,273
60,495
8,213,720
_4'110' 638
·12,324,358
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
2,871,630
1,919,292
(36lt ,638)
373,532
10,044,830
4,730,612
65,618
816,652
254,663
Balance
3-31-76
13,756,345
844,906
1,620,143-
64 ,180
16,285,574
10,232,435
266,131
23,833,572
15,036
28,419
52,f'/"\6
19,618,~
70,331,251
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1,012,092
985,000
65,000
219,497
1,228,798
2,409,119
28,965(1)
297,824
250,920(1)
FAGILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications
NIWA Planning . .
Coast Highway Force Main Litigation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
27,981
2,000
1,512
760
32,253
1,232,177
6,231
3,096,885
7,347
7,115
8,946
3,9118,667
8,339,621
2,017,349
641,243
656,909
67,45b
124,058
3,507,009
11,807
827,377
26,563
144,244
129,476
1,139,467
2,367,542
197 5-7·6
Additions
.2' 138
410
9,259
11,807
827,377
370,849
328,091
(2,450)
95,439
1,216,991
1,581,742
2,402
153,580
121,, 444
Balance
3-31-76
30,119
2,000
1,922
10,019
44,060
2,059,554
6,231
3,096,885
7,347
7,115
8,946
3' 9!18 '6 6 7
·839,184 .. ·9,178,805
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
~ Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses·
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
632,004
873,000
5,000
133,152
2,213,295
·.
386,933
582,486
5,698
116,102
3,304,514
571,000 4,631
2,695,137 733,641
35,546(1) 32,673
302,907 144,082
61,340(1) 21,431 ------
936,458
2,368,056
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications
Coast Highway Force Main Litigation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COfifPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQVIP~IENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment.
Balance
6-30-75
7,405
90
274
7,769
1,092,580
562
618,344
2,653
7,394
16,237
3,501,311
5,246,850
197 5-7-6
Additions
1,264
21~
3,343
4,631
733,641
738,272
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
245,071
290,514
(698)
17,050
566,369
1,961,496
2,873
158,825
39,909
Balance
3-31-76
8,669
114
3,617
12,400
1,826,221
562
618,344
2,653
7,394
·5' 985) 122
.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
:
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
2,005,595
1,225,000
156,ooo
1,335,495
3,~56,841
4,921,573
694,061(1)
340,516
245,275(1)
FACILITIE& EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Tustin-Orange Trunk Prqjects
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
Oeneral Plant and Administrative
Facilities
~~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment.
Balance
6-30-75
569,167
2,395
571,562
1,531,845
230,165
16,003,785
10,782
12,440
4,908,993
23,269,572
5,106,557
1,208,184
816,671
168,656
271,732
7,571,800
729,020
1,028,597
476,084
161,319
111,372
2,506,392
5,065,408
197 5-7-6
Additions
729,020
729,020
1,028,597
797,411
408,329
(12,656)
1,063,763
2,627,821
3,892,976
217,977
179,197
133,903
Balance
3-31-76
1,298,187
2,395
1,300,582
2,560,442
230,165
16,003,785
10,782
12,440
4,908,993
1,757;617 ·25,027,189
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 19'/6
BUDGET REVIEW
.. • .
Remaini~ 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue .& Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1,217,106
1,051,000
5,000
L118, 523
2,741,000
3,140,553
94,700(1)
362,878
212,520(1)
FACILITIE& EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Slater Ave. Pump Station Wet Well
Slater Ave. Pump Station Modifications
Master Plan Report
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROFERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
.General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipmen~
Balance
6-30-75
52,030
7,698
1,302
i,314,073
18,711
3,797,881
3,053
19,936
l~ '211, 117
9,425,801
4,328,622
·,
741,794
700,571
16,573
216,046
6,003,606
19,488
882,369
85,938
179,941
72,381
1,240,117
4,763,489
197 5-7-6
Additions
19,467
21
19,488
882,369
475,312
350,429
(11,573)
202,477
2,721,512
2,258,184
8,762
182,937
140,139
Balance
3-31-76
52,030
27,165
1,323
80,518
2,196,442
18,711
3,797,881
3,053
19,936
4 '211, •. ,,,,,)
901,857 . 10,327,658
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
J CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS
MAY 31,, 1976
i'
l
..
ENGINEERIN G DEPART.1-fE NT
·~
CotJCRFTC
Fl N I SH VJOl::k'.'.1
('AULKll\JG
I~
f-IY\P
9
/liPt.CTI-
R ·co
C Ros~ <:DLL.E<'.itOkJ
G ys rt: M ~P: 1 tJG-.~,.,.
/ I\) ST!'.\'-L E'..0.
.S CL(f'v\ co LLE'C.TDR$
J ".lST A. L..l....C-..D
2
4
6
8
10
IZ
14
8 r '
I
D!GE'$1E~f
I
5 4 J 2 I
AERATION 8A$1N1
1~ PUf'Y\f/S Ar.J D 1~11'.--'11
-pJG tdSTi-\l..LED
'-\Gr
110 THE. i31": I . .... \ 'P s1ATIOIJ r(_r.TuPN sCu'C6:-PUI'< ..
I
3
s
7
9
II
13
839
W.A~TE ~LUD6E
Tfl/C.J(ENEl?S
M ECH A.NIS /A DRIV ES. '· I NS.l'<r::... Ll-:CP. C O N i r.:::o L
ROOM
P\.l ,4\ P' .s
1-lf'JD t+E:".AI
EXcHMJG~J::
. ..
1£t0NDARY Cl.AR/FIERS poo£. p...tJD r;.1 ,:11\..
P/:\.1'.lt:.LS. 1 1'>~'Tf>..LLf'1J D POWEi? 8UILD/NG
. 50 ___ MG D __ ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
CONTRACT NO. P1 -~16
.•
C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1 -t6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STAR TI NG DATE: June 27, 1974
$29,876,000.00
$25,779,272.77
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14' 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Contract is for the construction of Activated
SZudge secondary fa•eatment facilities at Plant No.
1. The new facilities UJi ii aid the Districts in
meeting. rrandated State and Federa Z ocean discharge
requirements.
urith PZant No. 2 effluent at the outfall booster
station, improving the overall quality of water
pwrrped through the outfall system into the ocean.
Significant struatures included in the contract
are the Blower Building, Aeration Baoins, Second-
ary CZarifiers, wo Digestern, Waste Sludge 'Ihic~
eners and the Power Building.
When completed, the secondary treatment system
llriZZ process the 50 mgd of wastet.Jater flowing
through Plant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then bl.end
. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work in the blower building has been minimal. The
exterior sliding doors have been installed and the
interior walk thru door jambs are being set.
Work on the Aeration Basins has· consisted primarily
of concrete finish work including caulking.
The sludge collection system is being installed in
the Secondary Clarifiers. Handrailing continues to
be installed. Pumps are being placed in the Return
Sludge Pump Station.
Interior door frames and handrail have been installed
in the Waste Sludge Thickeners.
Work in the Digester area consists of piping installa-
tion in the control building and tunnels.
<:.... ~ _,
-a t r
l>
0
-I en r-..
~ I
0 I () .
..
fTl I CJ)
I (J)
-0 I r
:t> z -i.
c_
0
OJ
z
10
-a
:E
I
0
~
(J1
----~
•fil
]
.
~:
; '
CONTRACT PW~ 045 ....
JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Oct. 1, 1975
... ...
x
Contract is for construction of a one million gaZ-
Zon per dt;.y pilot wastewater treatment plant at
Wastewater Treatment Plant !lo. 2. The pl.ant ziYil.l
use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System
(ACTS) dBveloped by the Natwnal Aeronautics and
Space.Agency's Jet Propulsion Labora.tory. This
treatment method tJas perfected in its experimental
6ta;_7ea with a mobile research unit opero.ted by JPL
personnel at the Distxj,.cts' Wastewate2• Treatment
Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaUey during 1974-75.
The system uses sludge removed from the wastewater
to produce activated Ca:I'bon t'hr.ough a pyrolysis
reactor. The activated caroon is then reintro-
duced into the wastewater stream in a secondary
stage for additional rerova.l of poliutantso Only
.. pari-iaZZy used after the second stage, the aativa-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan .. 28, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
ted carbpn Cznd secondary sludge slurry is fed into
the incoming wastewater stream to increase system
efficiency.
The mobile experimental unit used to refine this
system from laboratory bench experiments ?Ja.s batch
operated with mechanical handling of rra:terial from
stage to stage. The pilot plant wUi be a contin-
uousZy rwz, automated system.
As a prime objective .of the ACTS, it could solve
an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this
rraterial becomes more plentiful with i.-rrproved
wasteiJater treatment and fr.creased flows. In ad-
dition, the effZuent from this treatment system is
expected. to meet the discharge requirements of
the Districts' N.P.D.E.S. permito
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor completed final billing with exception
of telephone, reproducing machine and office time
fo~ last week of May. District staff working with
equipment suppliers on correcting problems associ~ted
with several pieces of equipment.
X!fhis contract is a design and conBtruct contract whereby the contractor
is paid $50, 000. 00 plus the actual cos'ts for ail labor and matel"':.als.
• I
I
' TRINIDAD Si. ~
O\S1. 2
~ co?lll'LE'J$
TO BE coNSTRUC'l'ED
-1iS'--
I
I t: <ti' i:.
~!
JI
ct::9 a.I
. coNlRACl No.2-14-3:
GRO\f t:: ST. -
"""'
v .. ~-rusrlt~
~ ',~~'IE.·
CONTRACT 2 -:-14 -3
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER ~ SOUTH SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 19 75
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 814, 462. 00
PAID TO DATE: $930,384.00
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Nov. 12, 1977
0 Calendar Days
Nov. 12, 1977
Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125
mi.le reinforced concrete pipe trunk line sewer a-
1.ong La. Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Imperial Hwy.
in Anaheim.
section of 33" diamete;. vitrified clay pipe is
designed to receive flows from the Sou.th R-1:ver
Trunk, serving Santa. Ana Canyon. With the comple-
tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa /'.r.a Can-
yon pwnping station can be abandoned.
The first one-third of the project uses 51" diam-
eter pipe, the bal.a.nce is 48".
Atso included in the contract is a lateml con-
nectol" line to the Santa Ana River Interceptor
system from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rd. a-
tong Imperial HUJy. to La Palma Ave. This 2750'
T11is section of the interceptor system is designed
to handle up to 3 5 mil lion gal Zons flow per da.y.
Included in this figure is 30 MGD alloi..xmce for
accepting future high brine wastev.:ia.ter flows f-::>om
San Bernardino an.d Riverside Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work is progressing very well on this job with the
cont~actor laying an average 180 feet of pipe per
day. The pipe heading has just passed La Palma
Avenue and Coronado Avenue. Back-end cleanup on this
job is being handled very well, and the city of
Anaheim is pleased w~th the progress and traffic
handling measures.
The contractor la~d 2,727 feet of pipe during the
month. '
~ . S4\\ ~""~b!c.Wis
""" ~i,. ~~~
• !;. 6-•~"·
r1"'.) \ t 0 ,~, "Jt ~ c r ()~ \ ~a-,.........__._~,,."'="'-'"~,El ~ C'>'C' l ~\""~"<'ACS I '"tl .
~t,\\ .
....._,__ lft -' 1 '
. '~. ~\.V\ Q.~~114\,,...\~"n ~w·s.i ~f( '" ~u "~
~ ~ .. , ..
DIST. 2
~COMPLETE
---...,, TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 2 -14 ~ 4
"'-"'
..
PRtV.4\TE RC.
WE.1 R CANYON Ro .
CONTRACT 2-14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH S
Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor
ST AR TI NG DATE : 0 ct . 15 , 19 7 5
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4, 240, 957. 00
PAID TO DATE: $3, 475, 544. 00
Controct ia for construction of a 5.1 mile long
section of re·tnforcecI concrete pipe trunk line
sewer from Imperial-l:.'wy. a Long La Palma Aveo in.
hu:heim, traversing the ne-i.J Yorba Regional Park to
Heir Canycn Rd. The 'I'ight-of-way then crosses the
Santa Ana River at · wo places as it· traverses.
county territor'lJ through Santa Ana VaZZey Irriga-
tion Co. and. Bryant Ranch properties to Gypsum Rd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7, 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMP LET I ON DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7
Depending or: design criteria, various sections of
this Zine use 42, 45 and 51 inch diameter pipe.
This section L-'>iz:l handle flows up to 32 million
gall-or.a per dayo Included in this figure is 30
J.1GD al Zowanoe for accepting future high brine
wastewater flows from San Bernardino and Riveroide
Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
The contractor is making good progress on ·this contract -
in spite of problems encountered with soil conditions not
indicated on the soi~s report. He laid 3,081 feet of pipe
during May and has completed pipe laying for all but the
two river crossings on the north end of the job. Excessive
water caused by soil conditions has necessitated laying a
three to four foot thick rock bed under the pipe joints as
they are installed, vs. a normal one foot layer. This
condition exists primarily from the upper river crossing
to the north end of the job. The contractor will submit
a claim for extra work due to these conditions.
The concrete foundation pad for encasing the pipe under
the upper river crossing is complete. Pipe will be installed
at this cros9ing during the first week in June, encased,
covered over, and the river bed returned to its normal path
so excavation can begin under the diversion channel.
Simultaneously, the contractor will begin trenching operations
at the southern terminus of the job at Imperial Highway and
La Palma Avenue during the first week in June.
·.
·oti NOANVJ
VNV \J.LNVS
S" -17l-l
·oN l)\f(flNO)
G ~lSJO
""tr~~~ ~~-\--""JI 'O~')f. '"O . "o+ .,-."'i--"'"':)
CONTRACT 2-i4-5
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
REACHES 6, 7 & 8
S. S. Zarubica; Contractor
STARTING DATE: Nov. 27' 1975
PRIGINAL CONTRACT: $2, 096, 676 · 15
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, 1976 . PAID TO DATE: $667, 694. 45
Contract is for the construction of .a 2. 4 mi le
long se~tion of reinforced concrete pipe Zin& sew-
er. The line goes through the Santa Ar.a Canyon
from where Contract No. 2-14-4 ends in about the
center of the Bryant Rench property, along the
210ute of the Santa Ana River and through tr~
northern portion of the Green River Golf Course to
the County Line. The Une terminates in a cor.t;ro 7,
and metering structure designed to measure flows
from the upper basin counties.
The line consists of 45, 42, and 39-inch diC1J11eter
sections of pipe. The diafr.eters cJiange in rela-
tion to design requirerr.ents. This cectior. of the
Santa Ana River Intel'ceptor system wilt har:.dle
flows of appY'oximtely 32 mill.ion gc.lfons per day.
Included in this figUPe is 30 /..'GD aUowance foz•
accepting futu:l'e high brir.e wastewater flo~s frcm
San BerriCIT'dino and Riverside Counties.
.·
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
The contractor has cleared brush and trees fro~ the right-
of-way from the northern most river crossing to the
southern terminus of the job and graded an access road for
most -of this distance. 250 feet of pipe were raid during
May.
Structural construction is complete on the mete.ring structu;re,
and cleanup work is. proceeding very well.
Planning continues with management of the Green River Golf
Course for restoration of a tee in the pipe laying ·right-of-way
that was .destroy.ed during trenching operations and landscaping
.and grading along the golf course north boundary.
\
An unspecified problem continues to delay installation of
electrical service to our contractor on the west side of the
·upstream river crossing for powering dewatering pumps at that
location. The contractor has moved downstream to a point
opposite the north end of Featherly Regional Park and is
dewatering there, using portable generat6rs, in preparation
for trenching operations. Trenching should begin during the
first week in June.
Two power poles in the righ-of-way are scheduled to be moved
by Edison Company during the first week in June. These poles
are within a short distance of where the ~ontractor has
chosen to begin trenching.
'Ot\1fl
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Hcntk Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146. 00
PAID TO DATE: $693, 462. 99
Contract is· for t}1e construction of a reinforced
concrriete structure to house wet we Us and pwr.ps
for t1unsferring tribidar:J uxi.stewater through a
force m:iin line into· the Santa Ana River, Carbon
CCI/'11.JOn Inte11 ceptor-re Zief Trunk Line system for
conveyance to Wastewate~ ReclaJnation Plant Noo 1
in Fozmtain Valley. 'lhis 1,izi assist in relieving
the presently congested Newhope-Plaeentia T1"Unk
Line and wiU se2-.ve proposed Zari.d use development
of the tributary a:l'ea to the year 2010.
~1-.e pwnp station structure is located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Assooia:ted
Road in Ful:lerton. It is being constructed on
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Sept. 22, 1976
81 Calendar Days
Dec. 10, 1976
?Jhat was originally UniversitzJ of California, Ful-
terton property at the nortlzc11 n perimeter of the
campus. Special arrangements were TTYJ.de zvith the
University for use of the prope11 ty.
The ahove-growi.d portion of the :Jt;ru.cture LYi iz be
a lOUJ profile slab 85' x 109', 2 feet above
ground. Th.e deepest portion of the structure will
be :55 feet under the ground. The DilJtrict has
agreed to construct a slump-stone fence a~ound the
structure and landscape the area in u.ccordc:nce
mth futu1~e corr.patibZe use by the Vrdversity. The
Universib:J plans to construct an arboretwn in the
Urrmediate area at some future date.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Construction and equipment installation is
complete. Final testing is underway.
CI3.1.Jf'Jl,T~OJ 3a 0.1 • -_,. _ _.
Z 91.SIO
~T\~~
----------~~ ~~
'.
CONTRACT 2-16-2
YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO
KRAEMER BOULEVARD
Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976,
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: ,.$660, 287. 98
PAID TO DATE: $530,907.68
Contract is for construction of a 1. 4 mile seUJer
force main of 30-in.ch ductile ir.:i12 pipe. This
line will ca.rry sewage pwnped from the Yorba Linda
Pwr!p Station at Yo1.,ba Linda Boulevard an.d Associ-
ated Road in Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana
River Trunk line system at Palm Drive and Kroemer·
EouZevard in Placentia.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Da.ys
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
This force rrain ar.d the pur.:p station are designed
to relieve the presently corgested Na.ihcpe-PL.c.cen-
tia Trunk Line. It will serve proposed land u.sq.
development of the tributary area t.o the year 2010.
The force main is desigr.ed to accept up to 1.'i miZ-
Zion gaZlor.s per day flows.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
We reported last month that a pit had been left open at the
intersection of Placentia Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard
for access to the pipe tunneled under Placentia and grouting
operations around that pipe. The contractor did not wish
to perform air tests and grouting of the tunnel on the
completed portion of the pipe, allowing closing the pit, until
the enti~e line was completed. Work has been shut down on the
job at the order of the Supervising ~ngineer· until the coritractor
complies with orders to perform the requested air testing, and
close the pit, which interferes with the business of a gas
station on that corner.
Tunneling under the freeway was allowed tc continue and is
now complete. Pipe is being installed.
The portion of the line that came in conflict with an 86-inch
storm drafn in ··sapphire Road discovered to be inaccurately
·located on the job plans has been redesigned and will be
constructed by the contractor at an added cost to the District
of $11,761.80. Basically, this will require lowering about
two feet to clear the storm drain over a 600 foot portion of
the job.
JI LINCM4 AVF. IL ~
<;:\~o-\ Q~A
\~s~\\t\~\C\tl
U""~ W°''
RANGE
~,.Sr_.,_.....----·
a,, 'r1 4:a~ ~ ~""t\~
~°'ve--\-~~ ~
c.."--~ ~-<b\\ \~M
V\ ovT"' a.~ ~ \ \ ~" •
DIST. 3
--wa .. COMPLETE
CllY OF
l\:11 BUENA
~ ~I I PARK
~ ~
CERRITOS
CITY
~TELLA
..---TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
O~L
MIJllT£ ...
1~
'§
i.1 It~
CITY OP
ANAJ-IEIM
ROAD
AVE.
4.
AVE.
i::==-----
i
N
~
~
ll ._
STARTING DATE:
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G• Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
March 6, 1975
t
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: "$3, 876·, 870. 00 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE: $3,854,6~3.50 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6 ;· 19 76
Contract is for instaZ.lation of a Reinforced Con-
crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer Z.ine from a point 1200
feet south of Kate Z.Za Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Az>enue to LincoZ.n Avenue
in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 mile.'3. Pipe diame-
t.ers are 72 11 for the first 3, 900 feet, 53" for
6, 900 feet and 66" for the remainiri.g 1200 feet of
the project. F'lows from this reach will drain in-
tc> Contract 3-20-1 to the south.
congested MiUer-HoZ.der Trunk Sewer by intercep-
ting ['lows fPom the rr.orthLJest portion of District
3. The southerly te1'17i7~nus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and El.tis Avenue
i.n Fpu.ntain ValZey. It wiZZ eventualiy extend to
Imperial, Avenue in la Habra.
This portion of the PeZief system is designed to
handle a fZow of 68 milZion gallons per day and
LJi.ZZ. serve the proposed deveZoped Zand use plan in
the tributa:ry area to the year 2010. This project is a portion of the Y..nott Interceptor
relief system designed to Pelieve the presently
. . :· ..
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Tunneling under Lincoln Avenue is c~mpleted and
pipe is in. Grouting o.pera tions are underway.
The contractor began excavation for the last 150
feet of pipe.north of Lincoln Avenue the first
week in June.
The paving subcontractor continues to repair bad
paving ~nstallation in the area from Ball Road
north to Lincoln Avenue. First course paving is
in in this area.
The City of Anaheim is conducting TV checks of an
8-inch sewer line that was replaced in parallel with
installation of the larger pipe. It appears there are
cracks, broken joints and settling in portions of the
line between Ball Road arid Lincoln Avenue. This will
have to be repaired before final paving is installed
~n that area .
. ·
'
DIST. 3
~~ COMPLETE
1m1BB1-r&ill TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No.
3-21-2
CRESC.ENT II AVE. ==================.='..;
L INC o L N '.I, AVE •
-lllll!!l lliCDI ... -.. -llim ~ .... __ _
OR.ANG£
1-
LU
llJ er
l-
U)
> a
0
0
AVE.
8.~LL :?: RD. ---=-------'
,.~-k. . .
. ,. ., ,.·!('ARBON CR EEK . ~i .,:J'"/v-;y RA .. .__,~ ... ' -~ ·. ·-C HANNE.L
.Li\1~ ,. " .....
I MARION JG_
. ""--c_£_R_A._1_T_o_s _ ____, I Av E.
EXERCISE it
TRACK~---,1r-~STA8LES
\ ... 111 ___ I ---I S.P,R.R.
_ JJ ltl UIJ! 1I!11111i!1 l ! 1l11lIi111111: l: 1l1111111 l
Ii 1
D 1 ARROWHEAD g·i
MFG. CO. U I
____ -:J .l(AT£LLA AVE.
CONTRACT 3-21-2
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29
B & P Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: .$1,177,745.00
PAID TO DATE: $122,214.50
Contract is for construction of a 2. 75 mile sec-
t-ion of vitrified clay pipe trzmk line sewer
t.izmugh the City of Ci.Jpress from Y.ateUa Avenue in
Los Alamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De-
pending on design critie:tia, t71e pipe line is in
various sizes from 15 11 to 30 11 in dicunete1~.
This secUon of Zine tJiZl complete the rraster-
planned I·/estside Relief Interceptor sewer that be-
gins at the Seal Beach BZvd. Pumping Station at
CONTRACT COMP LET I ON DATE: Dec. 24, 19 76
Tl ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24, 1976
SeaZ Beach Blvd. and Tlestmir.ster Ave. This system
is designed to relieve the Los Alamitos Subt1•unk,
which at present functions as the main sewer for
the wes tside basin. For the most pca.'t, this Zine
is currently [lO..Jing at or near peak capacity.
This section is designed to handle fZoLJs up to
6. 32 million gaUons per day and wiZZ sez>Ve ·pro-
posed Zand use plans in the tributary to the year
2010. .
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
I
Th~ contractor broke ground and lai~ 1,003 feet of
pipe during May. The pipe heading is now in the
vicinity of Myra Avenue.
A jacking pit h~s been .excavated, and the contractor
is tunneling under the Carbon Creek Flood Control
Channel just north of Myra.
The contractor experienced some difficulty in meeting
backfill soil composition and compaction specifications
in the early stages of the job. An acceptable blending
of sand and native soil was worked out and all material
placed in the trench meets specification ·requirements.
_ ___..ll WALNU T II AVE . IL
'
DIS T. 7
=-COMPLETE
CH APMA N
.. ..:
<I)
Q')'
w '
-~I
c:( ..,
--e:lll!l:ill TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CO N1.RA CT N O.
7 -6 -8
t
8
4: ;z
J..
~ ....,
"'
.-: ~a rJ) >
S T. -·~ ~ SPRING
. "'tti!P!f:._;\!:""-""l!llRl~.'=-~t'Cl:-'Cl !ft--'I~[v 1Nt: I~ '[ 101 j cswrER ST ... ~
D I· ll cf.'ARLS T . 1 ~
1s00!AvE. I[
DD ~\/\IA~\.l \NIOTON
~PiAIL..0 I n ..--, l'---i.
lw
f D
,, 4::
t ~
~~ ~.·en 'fJ W
~
4: ::r:
...J
<L <
uJ
~ ~ ~A I R~AVEN AYE .
..,
CONTRACT 7-:6-8
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWERJ PORTION OF REACH 12J REACH 131
AND PORTION OF REACH 14
Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $512,892.00
PAID TO DATE: $520, 453. 00
Ccmtract is for constructing a 1. ?8 mile secti.on
of trunk lir.e sewer of 21 and 27 inch diair.eter
vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in the Lerrr:m Heights
area of Orange.
!l'he line be~ns in the vicinity of Fairhaven Ave-
nue and Esplar.ade Street, goes north on Esplar.ade
Street to Spring Street and east on Spring Street
to Santiago Boulevc.Pd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
\
This project ia the final portion of the mastei--
pZc::nned Tustin-Orange Trunk Li~e Relief System.
The system provides dra.iriage for the central and
northern portions of District No. 7.
This section is designed to handle fler.Js up to
6.?2 million gallons per day and uiZZ serve pro-
posed land use development of the tributary area
to the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Job complete
Project to be recommended for
acceptance at the July Board.
•
.3/\V' :r: N\IWdVH')
-----(Tl =;a:;~;~----~
(f)
l> z
-I
a~
10
· i.s
·3/\'V
(T1
(/)
(}') ... 9N\BdS
.LON1VM
·3/\'r/ QN09
6-9-L
·oN 18\tt:JlN08
----
Pi
L ·1s10
..
.'
CONTRACT 7-6-9
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER
PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16
Sully-~liller Contracting Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: COtffRACT COMP LET I ON DATE: Oct. 26, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Apr. 29, 1976
$295,826.40
$36,750.00
Tl ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 26, 1976
This contract is the last reach of the nuster-
planned Tus tin-Oro.n.ge Trunk Sewer to be const:rtu:!-
ted by the District. It consists of a 1. 5 mile
section of vitPified clay pipe line va.rying f'l'Om
· 18 to 21 inches in diameter.
This portion of the trunk sewer lJJi ZZ connect into
an existing 18" sewera "line naJ ooned by the City
of Orange. The upstr·e:im system feeding to this
point is scheduled to be purcr1<1sed by the Distnct
at a later date.
.. -
Construction wiZ'l begin at Santiago Boulevard and
Spring Street in Ora.Fzge and go north to Santiago
Canyon Road, where the projeat ends. The Zine
traverses portions of the City of Grange and un-
incorporated County area a"long its route.
Designed f'low for this portion of the trunk 'Line
system is 4.65 MGD, and will serve the _proposed
developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to
the year 201 O.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
The contractor broke ground during the
in May. He has laid 350 feet of pipe.
progressing very well on this job with
operations following pipe installation
closely. ·
last wee}\
Work ·is
backfilling
very
SUMMARY
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During May
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During May
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT
$31,311,934
26,720,851
1,394,613
$17,402,719
10,330,817
1,348,022
$31,311,943
$17,402,719
$48,714,662
·r
'W'd Q£!L -9L61 '6 3Nnr
SlNJWnJoa 9Nil~OddnS CTN~ SNOilnlOS3~
WARRANT NO,
29629
29630
""9631 .
~9632
29633
29634
29635
29636
29637
29368
29639
29640
29641
29642
29643
29644
29645
29646
29647
29648
29649
29650
29651
29652
29653
29654
29655
29656
29657
29658
29659
29660
29661
29662
29663
29664
29665
29666
29667
29668
29669
29670
29671
29672
29673
29674
29675
29676
29677
29678
29679
~9680
~9681
29682
29683
"A-1"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
. ·1N FAVOR OF
Admiral Corporation, Sampling Equipment
Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
All Bearing Service, Inc., Pipe Supplies & Bushings
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
V. B. Anderson, Small Tools
Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Parts
Banning Battery Company, Batteries
Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts
C & R Reconditioning Company, Engine Repair
C S Company, Engine Parts
Cal-State Seal Company, Seals
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Cam Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil Removal
Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware
College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair
Leelon Cory, Employee Mileage
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage.
N. A. D'Arcy Company, Equipment Parts
John M. Deck, Equipment Parts
Derby's Topsoil, Paving Materials
Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies
Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage
Envirotech-Sparling Division, Strip Charts
Essick Machinery Co., Compressor Parts
Fibre-Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Protective Coatings
Fischer &'Porter Company, Strip Charts
City of Fountain Valley, Water
Edward R. Francis, E-079 Inspection Travel Expense
Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer
General Telephone Company
Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies
Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
Hightower Metal Products, Hardware
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope.& Valves
Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental
IDS Corporation, Office Supplies
Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
Karlee Company, Maintenance Supplies
King Bearing, Inc., Hardware & Bearings
Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
L. A. Liquid Handling Systems, Pump
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies
L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
Judy Lee, Employee MilcagQ·
Lube Lift Equipment, Oil Tanks
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 392.20
121. so
178.90
4,783.59
169.60
31.80
401.08
368.35
1,575.67
230.00
238.50
147.13
45.71
12.21
1,852.18
42.86
236.27
333.67
818.54
1,548.55
909.88
8.25
22.84
6.00
16.35
34.46
43.46
318.00
15.90
63.66
35.14
57. 72
163.40
55.32
40.00
200.40
360.40
77.40
54.90
509.65
105.00
743.51
26.50
802.21
37.10
291.92
1. 75
542. 72
299.60
32.44
157.94
67.25
1,110.01
17.85
585.92
"A-1"
WARRANT NO.
29684
29685
29686.
29687
29688
29689
29690
29691
29692
29693
29694
29695
29696
29697
29698
29699
29700
29701
29702
29703
29704
29705
29706
. 29707
29708
29709
29710
29711
29712
29713
29714
29715
29716
29717
29718
29719
29720
29721
29722
29723
29724
29725
29726
29727
·29728
29729
29730
29731
"A-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PA!D MAY 11, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts
McGraw-Hill Publications Co., Technical Manuals
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools
Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Testing Supplies
Moltronics Division, Electric Supplies
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
National Chcmscarch, Lubricant & Cleaner
City of Newport Beach, Water
Nolex Corporation, Printing Supplies
Nu-Day Tools, Tools
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Quality Building Supply, Building Materials
Quik Spray, I.nc., Equipment Parts
Regents of University of California, 208 Planning Seminar
The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Rewes-Schock, Contractor 11-lR-l
Ryan Herco, Pipe Supplies & Fabricating
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor
Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies
The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service
Southern California Edison Company
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Concrete Materials, Concrete
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil & Gasoline
Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies
The Suppliers, Tools
Thompson·Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies & Equipment Parts
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts & Truck Repair
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Equipment Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Al Ursic, Employee Mileage
Valvate Associates, Valve Parts
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Digester Parts & Freight
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. S., Odor Consultant
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 177.51
20.62
270.1'1
35. u-_,
63.96
172. 94
2,470.96
620.10
5.81
502.14
30.62
38.16
318.42
232.83
220.15
231.47
35.00
76.86
7,802.77
412.87
18.55
42.56
42.81
688.33
44.34
205.00
395.00
990.35
183.59
167.80
5,652.73
53.43
1,089.35
957.81
79.24
388.91
32.54
6.28
784.94
10.65
35.51
2,122.36
460.57
217.51
34.26
217.60
2,554.00
20.25
$ 52,577.76
"A-2"
WARRANT NO.
29613
29614
~ 29615
29616
29617
29618
29619
29620
29621
29622
29623
29624
29625
29626
29627
29628
"A-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 .
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Belmont Engineering, Retention, PW~045
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, JPL ACTS & Fae. Plan
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-079
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
E & G Contractors, Retention, PW-046
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant
Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services, P2-8-8
J. Putnam Benck, Contractor, PW-045
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management, Pl-16
LBWS, Inc., Hydraulic Press & Tools
LFE Corporation, Retention, PW-045
Olympic Signs, JPL Signs
Southland Helicopter, Aerial Photos
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
8,069.83
5,182.65
17.58
317,318.29
1,284.50
586.18
420.00
492 .11
171, 034. 73
22,887.36
3,462.95
10,159.00
215.18
160.00
25.00
4,725.00
$ 546,040.36
$ 598,618.12
"A-3"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND \\'ARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
'29594
29595
29596
29597
29598
29599
29600
29601
29602
29603
29604
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3
Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Kasler Corp., & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4
Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3A
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14, 2-15, 2-16-2
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-2 & 3-21-1
DISTRICT NO. 5
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29605 Simpson-Steppat, Civil Engineering Service Back Bay Trunk Sewer
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29612 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19
"B II AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 159,048.00
226,320.Sl
257.59
6,033.60
1,004,164.95
1,297.44
40,334.62
277,342.38
$ 1,714,799.09
$ 1,077.00
568.92
187,557.36
$ 189,203.28
$ 6,800.00
$ 270.00
"B II
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29606 State of California, Annexation 46 Processing Fee
29607
29608
29609
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8, 7-6-9
Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor 7-6-8
Cou~ty of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-8
DISTRICT NO. 11
. ·oPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29610 State of California, Annexation 17 Processing Fee
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL-.OUTLAY FUND·l~ARR°ANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29611 Clifford L. Thorr.pson Construction Company, Contractcr 11-4R
II C" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
$
AMOUNT
180.00
1,940.00
247,565.70
26.08
$ 249' 531. 78
$ 24 9 , 711. 7 8
$ 85.00
634.98
$ 719.98
II c II
WARRANT NO.
29746
29747
29748
29749
29750
29751
29752
29753
29754
29755
29756
29757
29758
29759
29760
29761
29762
29763
29764
29765
29766
29767
29768
29769
29771
29772
29773
29774
29775
29776
29777
29778
29779
29780
29781
29782
29783
29784
29785
29786
29787
29788
29789
29790
29791
29792
29793
29794
29795
29796
29797
29799
"D-1"
.J U l N · 1-IJ l ::> · 1 F. 1 l, 1 ~ l, L J\ .t l'1 ;:;> Y J\ l U M J\ 1 L. ~ , J. ~ I u
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
A-1 Metal Services Corp., Control Panels
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Seals & Bushings
Aljac Supply Company, Tools
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
Ameren Corrosion Control Di vision, Clear,er
City of fu1aheim, Power
AMSA, Conference Registration
Bank of America, Coupon Collection
Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Parts
Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Furniture
Belt Repair & Installation, Conveyor Repair
Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair
Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams
Building News, Inc., Safety & Technical Manuals
Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Art Carr Transmission, Truck Repair
Catco, Inc., JPL Chemicals
College Book Company, Technical Manuals
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Crown Controls, Inc., Controls
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies
Daily Industrial Tools, Tools
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Electric Switches, Inc., Electric Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts
Compressor Products Division, Compressor Parts & Repair
Frederick Pump & Engineering, Pump Parts
General Telephone Company
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
George T. Hall Company, Controls
Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Valve Repair
City of Huntington Beach, Pennit Fee
ILG Industries, Duct Fan
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
L A Truck Equipment, Truck Parts
LBWS, Inc., Tools, Welding Supplies & Hardware
L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service
Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Tools & Hardware
City of Newport Beach, Water
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies & Equipment Rental
AGENDA ITEM tfl -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
383.
47~"4"
280.78
74.73
4' 931. 34
59 . .10
133.04
125.00
16.80
269.09
296.22
325.15
2,868.60
44.SS
78.00
182.17
79.55
94.26
201. so
1,071.50
31.54
962.83
3,097.10
525.13
234.15
80.00
25.18
170.00
45.58
3,000.00
63.07
495.16
83.06
3,002.30
1,107.00
406.77
40.67
495.74
187.93
390.00
624.10
92.33
1,171.30
700.99
1,209.49
48.19
1,382.13
373.12
72. 04
407 .14
503 ·"'-"
197.54
"D-1"
WARRANT.NO.
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
29800
29801
29802
~9803
29804
29805
29806
29807
29808
29809
29810
29811
29812
29813
29814
29815
29816
29817
29818
29819
29820·
29821
29822
29823
29824
29825
29826
29827
29828
29829
29830
29831
29832
29833
29834
29835
29836
29837
"D-2"
Pacific Telephone Company
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Pwnp Parts
Rockwell International, Calculator
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co. , Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools
Southern California Edison Compa.ny
South Orange Supply, Hardware
Speede Speedometer, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil
The Suppliers, Tools & Hardware
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Retirement System Study
Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Union Oil Company of Califon1ia, Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Permit Printing
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Valley Towing, Truck Towing
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
Water Pollution Control Federation, Technical Manuals
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Westron Corporation, Electric Supplies
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
James Wybenga, employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service
Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 475.70
220.48
64.00
136.42
395.37
28.51
455.22
303.30
301. 94
48.65
13,206.63
53.69
6.37
1,281.62
153.59
32.12
66.42
42.43
3,000.00
53.00
495.35
19.27
20.02
288.08
33.00
607.57
30.00
36.30
198.51
233.30
334.08
2,046.00
22.50
35.46
3,422.94
1,310.74
99.87
262.89
$ 62,608.90
"D-2"
WARRANT NO.
29739
29740
29741
29742
29743
29744
29745
29837
"D-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
TN FAVOR OF
Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc., Tools
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor PW-045
Material Handling Supply, Shelving
P ~ S Repair Service, Contractor E-079A
Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent
Siemag Systems, Inc., Retention E-076
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL Services
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 340.32
122.~
468.2
110, 900. 00
191.86
17,600.00
370.60
170, 711. 25
$ 300,704.98
$ 363,313.88
"D-3"
~VVl'tl I ..JMl~.L 11"'\I .lVl't V.L..) l".lvl..) VI V"/-'\l'f\.:JL-vVUl'tl I
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 1
--~~----~~~-------~
:O~RACTOR: Mccalla Bros. DATE ____ ~_1a_.y_2_6..._,_19_7_6 ____ _
PUMP AND DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIO~AL PUMPING FACILITIES
JOB: AT THE OCEAN OlITFALL PU~IPING STATION, PLA..'IT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-6-lB
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEOUOf) $ 11,958.92
In accordance with contract provisions, ·the following changes in the contract ~nd/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~vedo
ADD:
Increase base plate elevation from 22.35' to 24.85'
(30'') by extension of colunm and shaft. (Required
for engine stability due to lack of adequate founda-
tion for vibration purposes.)
'Pwo units each $5,641.00 plus 6% sales tax
TOTAL ADD
' No time extension this change order.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~~~(ki;Q
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 Approved:
$11,958.92.
$11,958.92
$ 345,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 11,958.92
$ 356,958.92 ----
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
. Orange County, California
By . ----------------------------------......, Associate Engineer
By
------------------------------~-----Contractor
By
---------------------C-t-li_c_f~E-n_g_i_n-ee~r·
II E" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II E II
II F II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-95
APPROVING ADDENDUM TO JOB NO. J-6-lB
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WI11I MC CALLA BROS. FOR PUMPS AND OR IVE UNITS FOR
ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL
PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lB, PROVIDING FOR
CHANGE IN PROVISIONS FOR PAYMENT OF SALES TAX AND
PROGRESS PAYMENTS TO THE CONTRACTOR
* * * * * * * * * * *
Tiie Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain addendwn, dated
purchase agreement with McCalla Bros. for Pumps and Drive Units for Additional
Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington
Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lB, providing for payment of sales tax directly
to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California, Board of Equalization,
and revising .the progress payment provisions of said purchase agreement, is
hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting as
agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, Calif~rnia, are hereby authorized and directed to execute· said
addendum in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS II F"
II G II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-96
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lC AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TILTING DISC CHECK
VALVES FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES
AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT
NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB
NO. J-6-lC, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * *
TI1e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tirn t the contractor, Valves and Primer Corpora ti on, has
completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for TILTING
DISC CHECK VALVES FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL
PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC,
on May 31, 1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. TI1at Job No. J-6-lC, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated Augu:;t 28, 1975; and,
Section 4. TI1at the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II G''
~ U UN I T ~ f\N l I A I l UN U l :::> I K. l l. I :::> U i U t<A N \J t:. l. U UN I 1
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO. ----------------------CONTRACTOR: ____ ~F_le_m_i_n~g __ Co_n_s_t_r_u_c_t_io_n~------------------DATE _______ J _u n_e~2_, __ 19_7_6 __ ~--~------
JOB: Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DR:Dl:J!i~ $ 13,600.22
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
~ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~ved.
ADD:
1. Excavate Trench (4100 LF@ 1. 15/LF)
2. Provide 9" Sand Bedding @ 4.00/Ton
3._ Backfill and compact 380 cy@ 5.25/cy
~. Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 40 pipe conduit:
Ins ta 11 211 1 60 L F @ 1 • 00
Instil 11 3" 1 60 LF @ 1 • 50 ·
5. Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 80 pipe condu!t:
6.
Install 411 180 LF@ 2.00
Open trench install 411 P.V.C. Backfill,
compact;" pave trenc~
7. Supply and instaJl Edison cone. boxes
with lids as called for on plan
1200.00 each x 3
TOTAL ADD
$ 4,715.00
911.12
1,995.00
160.00
240.00
360.0Q
1,619.10
3,600.00
$13,600.22
Original Contract Price $ 141,441.10
Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo
This Change (ADD) (~~) $ 13,600.22
Amended Contract Price $ 155,041.32
Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
• Orange County, California
By ______________________ ~--~~----
Con s ult i ng Engineer
By -----------------------------------
By
----------------------~---------~ Chief Engineer
Contractor
"'I" r AG END,~ ITEM #3 (n) -ALL DISTRICTS II H II
II I II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-94
AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO SIGN
CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING FRED A. H/\RPER, GENERAL MANAGER,
TO SIGN ALL CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED BY THE
CHAIRMEN OF THE DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, during the course of ordinary business on behalf of each and all
of the Districts, certain documents and contracts need to be executed by, and
on behalf of, the Districts; and,
WHEREAS, during the course of these business transactions, the authority
of the Boards of Directors by and through the execution of documents by the
Chairmen is not required by law or by local rules of the Districts; and,
WHEREAS, for convenience to the Districts, its employees, suppliers and
contractors, the ordinary course o( business is greatly improved by having the
General Manager execute necessary documents.
NOW, THE.REFORB, the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE,
DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1. That Fred A. Harper, General Manager of the Districts, is hereby
authorized to execute any and all documents on behalf of each District or on behalf
of the Joint Administrative Organization that are required in the ordinary course
and scope of the operations of the Districts. This authority shall not empower
the General Manager to execute those contracts or documents whicl1 are expressly
required by law, contract specifications, or other local rules, to be executed by
the Chairman of the respective District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(1) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II
C.
I
\
'-
"J-1"
June 1, 1976
Mr. Ray .E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
GOVERNMENTAL
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES-FOR THE
PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT MAPS FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
Dear Mr. Lewis:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser-
vices referenced above.
The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks
as outlined in your letter dated May 11, 1976, is as follows:
1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in
your letter. We will prepare that portion of maps 21, 22,
27, 28, 34 and 35 that are within the District 1 boundary.
We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on
any previously prepared maps with the exception of those
streets that are shown on the partially completed map 27.
Total man hours required to complete this task is 30.
2. Search of records to acquire required documents -· total
man hours:lO.
3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified -
total man hours required: 4
4. The number of man hours required· for.this task is included
in Task No. 1.
S. The number of man hours required to compl~te this task is
included in Task No. 3.
6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8.
Total Man llours = 52
AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1
2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (Bldg. A), Santa Ana, California 92705, 714 547-6375
"J-111
r
~·
c·
"J-2"
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
County' sanitation Districts
of Ora~ge County, California -2-· June 1, 1976
The above stated times are assuming that we will be able to
secure within a two or three year period, the date that the
property was acquired.
Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is
$1, 091. · Should you have any questions concerning this proposal,
please call me.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
very truly,
AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1 "J-2"
Date: June 3, 1976
.. ENVIHONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Name of Project; Raitt Street Trunk Sewer
COUNTY SANITATION ,01srmc1
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA -0.2708
(714) 540-2910 ~
(71..C) 962-2..C 11
Location: From Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to
_Myrtle Street
Entity or Person
Undertaking Project; County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange
County
Staff Determination:
I
The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study-
of this project in accordance with·Section.31 o~ the District\~ guidelines
entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality,
Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaini.ng whether the proposed
project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the
following conclusion:
"K-1"
The project could have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a~ EIR will be required,
~c?_x.
General Manag~
AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-1 11
.. ....
~,
"K-2"
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC"
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
108-44 ELLIS AVE~UE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
.(71-4) 5.C0-2910
(714) 962-2411
This form shall be completed to comply
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
County Sanitation Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 5,
California, dated February 15, 1974.
with the Guidelines Implementing the
As Amended and as adopted by the
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
Title and Location of Proj~ct: Raitt Street Trunk, Sanitation District No. 1
The proposed trunk ·extends from Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to
Myrtle Street
Description of Project The trunk will connect to the Sunflower Trunk
and will be sized from 30" ·to 24" and be 3 1/4 miles long. It will
cost about $1.SSM and will require R/W acquisition but no relocations.
This trunk will relieve the Greenville-Sullivan Trunk and will be
growth inducing.
GUIDELINES
1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 25?
Yes No x
(If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form)
2. Does the project qualify as:
a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes No x.
b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes~-No x
c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes ___ _ No x
d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 34) Yes~-No x
e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30)
Yes No x
{If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-2"
If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
.3. Initial study procedures
A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 31)
I
i.· Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as per the following: ·,
a. Is it in conflict with envirorunental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No x
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes No x
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes ~-No
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or-migratory fish or wildlife species?
Yes No x
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No x
f. Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Yes No x
g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
Yes No x ..
h. Could it .cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No x --
i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic
hazards? Yes No x
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes x No
If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail.
This trunk has excess capacity and is sized to provide
for growth.
x
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report
may be required.
4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown
in the "Guidelines Implementing the .California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as Amended"
"K-3" AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-3"
I ~ t
. ,
5. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in
causing preparation of same.
The Environmental Impact Report will be prepared by staff of
the County Sanitation Distridt No. 1 after the Board of Directors
has passed a resolution for its preparation .
Evaluation made by . ~~
Signature
AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7
6/3/76
Date
II L"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-105-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND
FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * *
TI1e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. Tirnt the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., has completed
the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, on May 31,
1976; and,
Section 2. 111at by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has reconunended
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. 111at the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers
and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and,
Section 4. 111at the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(M) -DISTRICT 2 II L"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-106-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 or ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING .SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND
FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., has completed
the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, on May 31,
1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' C~ief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work, which said· reconunendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers
and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and,
Section 4. TI1at the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -DISTRICT 2 "M"
Date: June 3, 1976
Name of Project:
Location:
Entity or Person
Undertaking Project:
Staff Determination:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side)
· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT~
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. DOX 8127
108.C.C ELLIS AVENOE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA '_.__1)8
(71.C) 5.C0-2910 ,,._.,,,.
(71-4) 962-2"411
Beginning at Coast Highway Trunk at Back Bay Drive
and Dunes Park and continuing in Back Bay Drive to Big
Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the
pump station at Jamboree Road·
County Sanitation District No. S of Orange County
The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study
of this project in accordance with Section 31 of the District's guidelines
entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaining whether.the proposed
project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the
fol I owing conc'l us ion: ·
"N-1"
The project could not have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a negative delcaration should
be prepared.
AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-1"
...
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
·.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT~
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108.c.4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71..C) 5.C0-2910
(71..C) 962-2.C 11
This form shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, dated February 15, 1974.
Title and Location of Project Back Bay Trunk Sewer, County Sanitation District No. 5
Beginning at Coast Highway Tru~k at Back Bay Drive and Dunes Park and continuing in
Back Bay Drive to Big Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the
pump station at Jamboree Road
Description of Project The proposed project is the design and construction of a
24-inch cast iron gravity sewer to replace an existing, at capacity, pump station at
Jamboree Road. Development under construction and approved for construction will exceed
the capacity of the pump station. The pump station will be fitted with generators and
used for emergencies.
GUIDELINES
1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in· Section 25?
Yes xx No
(If activity docs not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form)
2. Does the project qualify as:
"N-2"
a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes
b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes __ _
No xx
No xx
c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes __ _ No xx
d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 34) Yes___ No xx
e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30)
Yes No xx
(If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-2"
...
If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study procedures
A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 31)
I. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as per the following: ··
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No xx
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes No xx
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes Noxx
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species?
Yes No xx
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No xx
f. Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Yes No xx
g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
Yes No xx
h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No xx
i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic
hazards? Yes No xx
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No xx
If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail.
Present service area is 85% developed or approved for development.
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report
may be required.
4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown
in the "Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as Amended"
"N-3" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-3"
._.,
~
5. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in
causing preparation of same .
Evaluation made by ,. . .--.-~ , ..
"N-4" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5
May 25, 1976
Date
"N-4"
"0-1"
June 1, 1976
Mr. Ray .E. Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE
PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT MAPS FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
Dear Mr. Lewis:
GOVERNMENTAL
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser-
vices referenced above.
The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks
as outlined in your letter dated May li, 1976, is as follows:
1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in
your letter~ We will prepare that portion of maps 16, 17,
22, 23, 28 and 29 that are within the District 6 boundary.
We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on
any previously prepared maps. Total man hours required
to complete this task is 34.
2. Search of records to acquire required documents -total
man hours: 26.
3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified -
total man hours required: 5. ·
4. The number of man hours required for this task 1S included
in Task No. 1.
s. The number of man hours required to complete this task is
included in Task No. 3.
6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8.
Total Man Hours = 73.
AGENDA ITEM #8(s) -DISTRICT 6 "0-1"
2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (£1ldg. A), Santa Ana, CClliforniJ 92705, 714 547·6375
(-.
..,,,,
(
,,,,,..-.....
\
¥
"0-2"
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
County Sanitation Districts
of Ora~ge County, California -2-June 1, 1976
The above stated times are assuming that w~ will be able to
secure within a two or three year period, the date that the
property was acquired.
Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is
$1,521 .. Should you have any questions concerning this proposal,
please call me.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
very truly,
AGENDA ITEM #8(s) -DISTRICT 6 "0-2"
II p11
RESOLUTION NO. 76-110-7
AUTI IORI ZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT
FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES RE OFFSITE SEWER
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, IN CONNECTION
WITH OFFSITE SE\\1l::R LINE SOUTHWESTERLY OF INTER-
SECTION OF LA COLINA DRIVE AND RED HILL AVENUE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 10, 1976,
wherein an easement in the vicinity southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina
Drive and Red Hill Avenue for offsite sewer service. is granted to County Sanitation
District No. 7, is hereby accepted from La Colina Associates, a California Limited
Partnership; and
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted
is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and
Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in th~
Official Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(v) -DISTRICT 7 II P"
"Q"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-111-7
ACCEPTING GR/\NT OF EASJ:MENT FROM LERNER OIL
COMP/\NY AND AlJTllOR I Z I Ne; EXE CUTI ON OF ACIU:EMENT
RE EASEMENT RELATIVE TO CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-4A
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM
LERNER OIL COMPANY, INC., AND AUTIIORIZING EXECU-
TION OF AGREB1ENT RE SAID EASEMENT RELATIVE TO
CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-4A
* * * * * * * * * * *
TI1e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California,
DOES IIEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. TI1at the certain Grant of Easement, dated
~~~~~~~~~
wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation
District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Lerner Oil Company, Inc.; and, .
Section 2. That the real property over which said Grant of Easement is
granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached
hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is granted in connection with
operation of Sub-Trunk Sewers, Contract No. 7-3A-4A, in the vicinity of El
Camino Real and the Santa Ana Freeway, in the City of Tustin; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in
the Official Records of Orange County, California; and,
Section 5. That the certain Agreement dated
between County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and Lerner Oil Company,
Inc., relative to said easement, is hereby approved; and,
Section 6. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General
Counsel; and,
Section 7. TI1at payment in the amount of $1, 800. 00 to Lerner Oil Company, Inc.
provided in said Agreement and Grant.of Easement, is hereby authorized.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hcl<l June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(w) -DISTRJCT 7 "Q"
<EXCERPTED FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS)
8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE
ORGANIZATION -A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra-
tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts
at· the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice
·Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts.
The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the
regular Board meeting in June each year, and ihe nominees may prepare
a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications
for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the
members of .the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other
meeting material for the July regular meeting.
II R" AGENDA ITEM #12 -ALL DISTRICTS II R"
II s11
RESOLUTION NO. 76-99
ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CONFLICT
OF INTEREST CODE
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S,
6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, Cal~fornia,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code of the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Countf', a copy of which is attached
hereto and by reference incorporated herein, be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted for the Districts, subject to the approval thereof by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Orange; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary of the Districts be, and is hereby,
authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Orange and to request said Board of Supervisors
to approve said Code in accordance with Government Code Section 87303.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #13(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II S"
"T-1"
REPLY TO
ATTN OF:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA PASADENA OFFICE
PASADENA, CALlfORNIA 91103
HN-l(DEB)
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Off ice Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Gentlemen:
May 25, 1976
Subject: CSDOC/NASA Contract for the JPL Activated Carbon Treatment
Process
Reference is made to our meeting of May 19, 1976, pertaining to an
apparent $20,000.00 discrepancy. For this reason, the following is
submitted:
In an updated letter from the State Water Resources Control Board
issued between May 3 and May 28 (attached), a two-month predesign
phase effort was approved. The JPL effort was limited to $20,000,
to investigate the "best reactor with the basis for choosing this
reactor and available reactor sizes specifically delineated." An
experimental test program was specifically required to meet this
requirement. This approval was followed by a March 28 letter (attached)
req~estinr JPL to commence efforts immediately. This letter was
followed by a Purchase Order No. 28284 authorizing JPL to proceed
in accordance wiih the March 28 letter. Reference is made in this
purchase order to our proposal and "the agreement." A subsequent
modification to this purchase order was made to make NASA the vendor,
JPL participated in the described prcdesign phase, and expended over
$32,000 in those two months.
On June 20, the State Water Resources Control Board authorized contin-
uation of the project. On June 24 a draft contract was received from
CSDOC for $280,000. Figure 1 of this contract (attached) described
expenditures by month with a cumulative total of $259,500. The mis-
understanding appears at this point. JPL assumed the $20,500 to be
available for contractual change in scope. This misunderstanding did
not come to light until later. In the meantime, JPL was following the
plan of Figure 1 month by month.
AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-1"
.·
·.
"T-2 11
2
In January 1976, by telecon, Ray Lewis asked JPL to take a greater
!Ole in the operations. This expanded effort was begun in February
with a request for additional funding forwarded to CSDOC on March 4.
The additional effort requested by CSDOC amounted to $74,226. Instead
of requesting this amount, we deducted what we thought was the $20,500
for scope change. At this point, the misunderstanding came to light.
It should be pointed out that there has been no misunderstanding of
the work to be accomplished. JPL did the $20,000 effort in April/Nay,
followed the contractual effort as described in Figure 1, and provided
the additional effort as requested by CSDOC starting in February. Any
error, if we take CSDOC position, is only that we should have requested
$74,226 instead of $53,726.
Our position r6nains that we received a Purchase Order in the amount
of $20,000.00 and a Contract in the amount of $280,000.00 for a total
effort of $300,000.00. Our Task Order to JPL, which was provided to
CSDOC, indicated a total of $300,000.00. Subsequently, we have accepted
Amendment No. 1 to the contract, increasing the effort by $53,726.00 for
a new total of $353,726.00.
Since Amendment No. 1 to the Contract reads "up to a maximum total cost
of $333,726.00", our amended Task Order to JPL will have to be limited
to this amount. It is, therefore, requested that immediate action be
initiated to increase the contract total authorized by $20,000.00 to
enable JPL to complete this effort.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Edward F. Morris, Chief
Contract Placement Branch
AGENDA ITEM #14CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-2"
II U"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-98
AUTI-IORIZING AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
WITH NASA RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS
A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO TIIE
CONTRACT WITH NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS FOR
ADDITIONAL PRE-DESIGN WORK
* * * * * * * * * * *
111e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. 111at certain amendment dated , to the
~~~~~~~~~~
contract by and between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and
County Sanitation District No. 1, authorizing increase in the maximum amount
for services from $333,726.00 to $353,726.00 for additional pre-design work,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. TI1at the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation
District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of
itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #14Ca) -ALL DISTRICTS II u II
LAW Of"f"ICE:S
RICHARD 0. ,.RAZ EE
STEPHEN C.STEWART
THOMAS L. WOOORUF"F
.JEFf"REY A. HARTMAN
1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020
SANTA ANA, CALI f"ORNIA 92701
AREA CODE 714
835-6212
"V"
June 3, 1976
Board of Directors
County. Sanitation District No. 8
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Caiifornia 92708
The Resolution presented to your board for action at this
agenda is simply to ratify and confirm the fact that Re-
organization No. 31 between the South Coast County Water
District and South Laguna Sanitary District has been
accomplished and mee.ts all legal requirements as contained
in Health and Safety Code Section 4730, to enable to Water
District, as the successor agency, to have a member on the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8~
South Coast County Water District, as a successor agency,
and having met the requirements of the County Sanitation
District Act with regard to membership, will be the only
Water District with rights of membership in the County
Sanitation District. This is based solely on the fact of
the merger between the two districts and the fact that the
special State Legislation was enacted to enable South Coast
County Water District to continue its rights of membership.
TLW:mp
Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "V"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-112-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 8 CONFIRMING
THE SUBSTITUTION OF SOUTH COAST COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT AS A MEMBER AGENCY OF THE DISTRICT
IN PLACE OF SOUTH LAGUNA SANITARY DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND
SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730
WHEREAS, South Laguna Sanitary District is a member agency of
County Sanitation District No. 8 and a member agency of the Joint
Administrative Orgauization; and,
WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District, a public agency
organized pursuant to the provisions of the County Water District
Act, has accomplished a reorganization with South Laguna Sanitary
District, a public agency organized pursuant to the Sanitary Dis-
trict Act of 1923; and,
WHEREAS, the merger of South coast county water District and
South La.guna Sani tar_y District has the effect of the dissolution of
South Laguna Sanitary District with the South Coast County Water
District assuming all rights, duties and responsibilities together
with the assumption of all assets and liabilities of the Sanitary
District; and,
WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District will now provide,
through an improvement district, all of the same services formerly
provided by South Laguna Sanitary District; and,
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 4730, of the County
Sanitation District Act, has recently been amended, in furtherance
of the accomplishment of the reorganization between South Coast
County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District to
expressly provide for the special condition wherein a County
Water District which is wholly or partly in the Sanitation Dis-
"W-1" AGENDA ITEN #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-1"
trict and which on or before July 1, 1977, has assumed the
responsibilities, rights, duties assets, liabilities and
obligations of a Sanitary District, which at the time of such
assumption had representation on the Board of Directors of the
Sanitation District, would be included in the membership on the
Board of Directors of the Sanitation District; and,
WHEREAS, the reorganization between South Coast County Water
District and South Laguna Sanitary District has satisfied all legal
requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 to enable it to
have a member on the County Sanitation District No. 8 Board of
Directors; and,
WHEREAS, the reorganization of South Coast County Water Dis-
trict and South Laguna Sanitary District has been approved by the
voters at a special election:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD-OF DIRECTORS DOES HEREBY FIND,
DECLARE AND RESOLVE ·AS FOLLOWS:
Section.l. That South Coast County Water District, meets
all legal requirements as contained in Health and Safety Code
Section 4730 to entitle it to membership on the Board of Directors
of this district.
Section 2. This Board of Directors confirms and hereby grants
the South Coast County Water District membership on County Sani-
tation District No. 8 in accordance with the provisions of Health
and Safety Code Section 4730.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1976.
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-2"
"X"
May 19, 1976
County· Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Off ice Box 8127 .
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Sirs:
We, the ownership of the 107.876 acres, hereby request annexa-
tion to the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. A legal-
description. is attached describing the boundary of this proposed
annexation, as well as a description of certain parcels within
said boundary.
Certain parcels are designated by letter and the others by a
number. The reasoning for these parcels being designated within
the boundary of the proposed annexation is that we are requesting
to be relieved from payment of the annexation fees on a temporary
basis. Relief from payment of fees is requested for Parcels A, B
and C, which are equestrian trails and are designated as such on
the City of Orange Trail System. Parcel F is a driving range for
the Lazy B Golf Course and Ridgeline Racquet Club. Parcels 1 and
D are the Lazy B Golf Course itself. The balance of the property;
i .. e., Parcels E c.nd 2f consisting of 57.,373 acres, is proposed to
be subject to the usual annexation fees.
Therefore, we are hereby requesting that relief from payment of
annexation fees be given on the parcels described due to the type
of land use involved. If and when development occurs on any of
said parce·ls, it is understood that the proper fees would be due
and payable at that time.· It is our intent, however, that the
golf course and driving range become an economic unit, remain
undeveloped and never become a contributor to the sewage disposal
prob.lem.
Ownership of all of the parcels are by the same· persons and in
the same proportions: Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, and
Ridgeline Ranch, etcQ is owned by Lazy B Estates, Inc., a
Corporation ..
There are no residents on the property and, therefore, no voters.
~~
Norman Brock
Attachment
.. _ .......... ,., :
10604 MEADS AVENUE • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669 • (714) 633-4710 • (714) G33-9500
AGENDA ITEM #33(A) -DISTRICT 7 . "X"
MEETING DATE June 9, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5.6,7.8 and 11
DISTRICT 1
(EVANS) •••••••.• GARTHE •..••• _____ _
(EDGAR) ••.•..•. ~ SHARP •••••• __ ----
(DIEDRICH) .•••.. BATTIN······ --__ --
..._,, RIMA ••...•.• ------
DISTRICT 2
(GROOT) ••••.•••• WEDAA ••••••• ~HOLLINDENL .•• SCOTT •••.••• = = =
D I ED R I CH). • . • . . CLAR K ••.....
GARTHE) ••.••.•. EVANS •••••.• ------
~WEDDLE) .....•.. FOX ..••••••.• ------
DE Jysus>.. .... HOLT .•..••••. = = =
THOM ••••••...• KAYWOOD •..•. _____ _
PERRY ••••••.
(HOYT) •••••.•.•• SMITH •••.... ------
~TIPTON) •.•••••• WINN........ . = =
WARD) ........... WOOD ••••••••
GRAHAM) ••...•.. YOUNG •••••.• = = ~
DISTRICT 3·
(WARD) ••.•.. -•... WOOD •••••••• _____ _
(HOLLINDEN) •.•. SVALSTAD···· ------
(GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· ____ -· -
(WEDDLE)···· .. ·• COOPER·· .. •· ------
(SYLVIA).······· COX··· ... ·••• ------
CULVER· .. ··• ·------
(GARTHE). ·•·· .. ·EVANS··· .. •· ____ --
THOM) .......... KAYWOOD··00 • _____ _ ~PRIEST) .. •··•·• FRESE······· __ · ----
LACAYO) ••• ••••· MAC LAIN···· ------
DAVI s) · · · · · · · .. MEYER······· ____ --
OLSON • · · · • • • ____ --
DIEDRICH) •• ·••• SCHMIT······ ____ --~WI EDER) ........ PATTINSON··· _____ _
YOUNG)········· STEVENS····· _____ _
MILLER) •••••.•. WEISHAUPT··· ____ --
DISTRICT 5
MC INNIS •••• _____ ._
(DIEDRICH) .••••. RILEY ••••••• _____ _
(WILLIAMS) ••.••• ROGERS •••.•. _____ _
· DISTRICT 6
RIMA •••••••• _____ _
(ROGERS) ..•••••• RYCKOFF ••.•• _____ _
(DIEDRICH) .••••• BATTIN .•.••• _____ _
DISTRICT 7
ROGERS) .... •··• BARRETT····· _____ _ !EDGAR) •.••••••• SALTARELLI· _____ _
SILLS) ......... BURTON •.•.•• _____ _
DIEDRJCH). •• ... CLARK······· _____ _
EVANS)···· .. ·•· GARTHE • • · • · • _____ _
GLOCKNER···· _____ _
(HOYT)·········· SMITH······· _____ _
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _____ _
SHENKMAN •••• _____ _
WIEDF.R ...... ____ ._ --
DISTRICT 8
EDWARDS ••.•• _____ ._
(JOHNSON)) •...•. S~IEENEY ..••• ------
(DIEDRICH •.•.•• RILEY ........ ------
6/8/76
JOINT BOARDS
ROGER Si········ BARRETT······
DIEDlHCH) •••.•• BATTIN-··· ··• == ==
GRAY)) .••••••••• BLACKMAN •.•• __ ~
SILLS ••• \ ..• : •• BURTON •.•... ___ _
DIEDRICHJ ...... CLARK ....... ___ _
WEDDLE) •••.••.•. COOPER ••••••• ___ _
SYLVIA) .•••••••• cox .......... ----
CULVER ••••.•• ___ _
~GARTHEl .•••.••.• EVANS •••.••.. ___ _
WEDDLE ..••••.•• FOX ...•••.•.. ___ _
PR I EST .••••.•.• FRESE .••.•... ___ _
EVANS) •.••••.••. GARTHE. •.••.. ___ _
GLOCKNER •... ___ _
~DE Jf:SUS) ••.••• HOLT .••.•.•.. ___ _
THOM) .•..••••••. KAYWOOD .•... ___ _
LACAYO) .••.....• MAC LAIN .•.• ___ _
ROGERS) •.•••..•• MC INNIS •••• ___ _
(DAVI s) .......... MEYER •••••..• ___ _
OLSON •••••••. ___ _
(WIEDER) ••••••.• PATTINSON ..• ___ _
PERRY ....... .
(DIEDRICH) .•••.. RILEY •.••.••• = ==
RIMA ••••.•••.
WILLIAMS) .••.•. ROGERS .•••••• = ==
ROGERS1 ••••••.• RYCKOFF. •...• ___ _
EDGAR) •••••••.•. SALTARELLI •. ___ _
DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ••.•... ___ _
HOLLINDEN) .•.•. SCOTT ....•... ___ _
EDGAR) .•.••••.•. SHARP .•..•••. ___ _
SHENKMAN ..•• ___ _
!
HOYT) .••••••••.. SMITH ..•.•••. ___ _
YOUNG) .••.•••.•. STEVENS ••.•• ___ _
HOLLINDENL .•. SVALSTAD •••• ___ _
GROOT) ...•••••.• WEDAA .•••••.• ___ _
MILLERl. ••••••• WEISHAUPT ••• ___ _
WIEDER •..••• ___ _
~TI PTONl ••••••.• WINN ••••.•.•. ___ _
WARD) ••.•.•••••• WOOD .•••••••• ___ _
GRAHAM) •••••••• YOUNG .•.••••• ___ _
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
JUNE 9J 1976
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
1. THERE IS NO SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
DURING JUNE,
2. IF ANY DIRECTORS ARE INTERESTED IN BEING CONSIDERED AS
AN ALTERNATE ON SCCWRP (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER
RESEARCH PROJECT)) ADDRESS A LETTER OF INTEREST TO JOINT CHAIRMAN,
3, REPORT ON THE ATTACHED LETTER FROM RICHARD CODDINGTON, EPA.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IX
100 CALIFORNIA STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
Donald E. Winn, Joint Chairman
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley CA 92708
Dear Mr. Winn:
JUN 1 1m6
We would like to respond to your letter of May 13, 1976, to
Paul De Falco, and explain our understanding of the present
status of the Orange County Environmental Impact Statement.
The scope of the EIS remains essentially the same as described
in the "Issue Paper" and outline attached to the Memorandum
of Understanding transmitted to the Districts on May 14, 1975.
The only change is in the secondary impact/air quality
analysis which is possibly more sophisticated than originally
visualized.
The original contract with J. B. Gilbert & Associates was
for $60,000. We expressed our concern at the time of
contract negotiation that the final cost for the EIS would
likely be considerably above this amount. However, we
concurred with the position taken by the Districts that it
would be better to let the contract for $60,000 and increase
it when it became clear that additional monies were required.
This seemed to be a reasonable position for maintaining
fiscal control, since at that time we did not have experience
to accurately determine what impact statements should cost.
The increases proposed by J. B. Gilbert & Associates are as
follows:
EIS Draft Completion .
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
(including some lay-out work)
Reclamation Engineering
$55,000
$35,000
$10,000
I
-2-
The reclamation engineering work will eliminate an inadequacy
of the draft Facilities Plan. The $10,000 for this work is
properly ascribed to the Facilities Planning effort, and not
to the EIS. In order to avoid delays, the reclamation work
will be carried along parallel to the main EIS development,
and incorporated later in the draft EIS or in an addendum.
The printing costs on further examination appear excessive.
A more likely cost is $15,000, although this may fluctuate
depending on the number of copies deemed necessary.
We feel the costs incurred by this EIS to date are quite
reasonable. In fact, they are considerably lower than the
costs projected for the other two large South Coast impact
statements. Additionally, we are very optimistic over the
contents of this EIS. We expect it to satisfy its main
objective of complying with the provisions of NEPA and CEQA.
In so doing, it will become a very important background
document for future planning efforts, including wastewater
facilities planning, the air quality maintenance plan, and
"208" planning.
The cooperation exhibited so far by the Districts, the
consultant, SWRCB, and EPA has allowed considerable and
rapid progress toward the completion of the document under
the "joint EIS" procedure. We will do our utmost to continue
this cooperative effort and complete the EIS as soon as
possible. Should you wish to discuss this matter further,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~Lf) f'JJP~
Richard Coddi~~tg}i
Deputy Director
Construction Grants Program
cc: Larry Walker, SWRCB . A.J::vi
Jerome E. Gilbertp ~-;r5 f)~/1d~~f~
;) ~ .ii?!~J ~ ~.,.; , . ~". !)c}/"Jv.J . ert» /:>)>~~;,; t//
~~
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
SUPPLEMENTAL · AGENDA ITEMS
JUNE 9J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Post Office Box 81 27
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and fi le minute excerpts from
the following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment
of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City District Active Alternate
Fullerton 3 Frances Wood Robert Ward*
Huntington Beach 3 Ron Pattinson Harriett Wieder*
11 Harriett Weider*
ll Ron Shenkman
Los Alamitos 3 Ph illip E. Cox* Charles E. Sylvia
Sea l Beach 3 Thom as Blackman* Russell B. Gray
;
JUNE 9J 1976
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
1. THERE IS NO SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
DURING JUNE.
2. IE ANY DIRECTORS ARE INTERESTED IN BEING CONSIDERED AS
AN ALTERNATE ON SCCWRP (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER
RESEARCH PROJECT)J ADDRESS A LETTER OF INTEREST TO JOINT CHAIRMAN.
3. REPORT ON THE ATTACHED LETTER FROM RICHARD CODDINGTON, EPA.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IX
100 CALIFORNIA STREET
SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111
Donald E. Winn, Joint Chairman
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley CA 92708
Dear Mr. Winn:
JUN 1 1976
We would like to respond to your letter of May 13, 1976, to
Paul De Falco, and explain our understanding of the present
status of the Orange County Envirorunental Impact Statement.
The scope of the EIS remains essentially the same as described
in the "Issue Paper" and outline attached to the Memorandum
of Understanding transmitted to the Districts on May 14, 1975.
The only change is in the secondary impact/air quality
analysis which is possibly more sophisticated than originally
visualized.
The original contract with J. B. Gilbert & Associates was
for $60,000. We expressed our concern at the time of
contract negotiation that the final cost for the EIS would
likely be considerably above this amount. However, we
concurred with the position taken by the Districts that it
would be better to let the contract for $60,000 and increase
it when it became clear that additional monies were required.
This seemed to be a reasonable position for maintaining
fiscal control, since at that time we did not have exper~ence
to accurately determine what impact statements should cost.
The increases proposed by J. B. Gilbert & Associates are as
follows:
EIS Draft Completion
Printing of Draft EIR/EIS
(including some lay-out work)
Reclamation Engineering
$55,000
$35,000
$10,000
-2-
The reclamation engineering work will eliminate an inadequacy
of the draft Facilities Plan. The $10,000 for this work is
properly ascribed to the Facilities Planning effort, and not
to the EIS. In order to avoid delays, the reclamation work
will be carried along parallel to the main EIS development,
and incorporated later in the draft EIS or in an addendum.
The printing costs on further examination appear excessive.
A more likely cost is $15,000, although this may fluctuate
depending on the number of copies deemed necessary.
We feel the costs incurred by this EIS to date are quite
reasonable. In fact, they are considerably lower than the
costs projected for the other two large South Coast impact
statements. Additionally, we are very optimistic over the
contents of this EIS. We expect it to satisfy its main
objective of complying with the provisions of NEPA and CEQA.
In so doing, it will become a very important background
document for future planning efforts, _including wastewater
facilities planning, the air quality maintenance plan, and
"208" planning.
The cooperation exhibited so far by the Districts, the
consultant, SWRCB, and EPA has allowed considerable and
rapid progress toward the completion of the document under
the "joint EIS" procedure. We will do our utmost to continue
this cooperative effort and complete the EIS as soon as
possible. Should you wish to discuss this matter further,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
e4L~~
Deputy Director
Construction Grants Program
cc: Larry Walker, SWRCB l;:vi
Jerome E. Gilbertj} ~ §5
,;J rJfl'V;, b ~ 'tfaJ }I~ Wow/-,~-~---:"' )!l,"J J M ifv ~ /l:v.;
·' .. . P~ · ·. p · !Jo,~/'JvJ e?) ~,~# tr
foffN ~"'
1o r
' '
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
(4)
-ITEMS ON
SUPPLEM ENT AL AGENDA
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from
the following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment
of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor)
City District Active Alternate
Fullerton 3 Frances Wood Robert Ward*
Huntington Beach 3 Ron Pattinson Harriett Wieder*
11 Harriett Weider*
11 Ron Shenkman
Lo s Alamitos 3 Phillip E. Cox* Char l es E. Sylvia
Seal Beach 3 Thomas Blackman* Russell B. Gray
II
COAnos OF DIRECTons
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
JUNE 9J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR
WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY
OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessaryjt·~(~v,,' ·
,.-L
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda
(5) EACH DISTRICT
(6)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 May 12, 1976 regular
District 2 May 12, 1976 regular
District 3 May 12, 1976 regular
District 5 ~ay 12, 1976 regular
District 6 May 12, 1976 regular
District 7 May 12, 1976 regular
District 8 April 14, 1976 :regular
District 11 May 12, 1976 regular, and
June 7, 1976 adjourned
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Ron CALL Von: .......... -Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s)
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s)
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) II B"
DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B"
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) II B"
DISTRICT NO: 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page (s) "C"
DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C"
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS I 8 (A) THROUGH 8( w )
All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall he considered in the ·regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
'·
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Pump and Drive Units for the
Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping
Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, authorizing an addition
of $11,958.92 to the contract with McCalla Bros. to increase
base plate elevation. See page "E"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-95, approving Addendum No. 1
to the purchase contract with McCalla Bros. for Pump and Drive
Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall
Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, in form approved
by the General Counsel, to provide for payment of sales tax
directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California,
and amending progress payment provisions (does not affect total
contract price) ·See page "F"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-96, accepting Tilting Disc
Check Valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean
Outfall Pumping Station_, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California,
Job No. J-6-lC, as complete; and authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion. ~ee page "G"
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in
the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, authorizing an
addition of $13,600.22 to the contract with Fleming Construction
for trenching and underground vaults in connection with City of
Huntington Beach improvements incorporated into said contract,
Districts to be reimbursed by City for said cost. See page "H"
(e) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-93, determining the
prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts'
construction contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding
Resolution No. 75-85
(f) Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report
of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31,
1976; and approving recommended budget transfers (mailed with
agenda material)
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings,
conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within
the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value
to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses
incurred
(h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to
attend and participate in the AMSA Technical Conference on Finance
and Management of Wastewater Agencies to be held in Seattle,
Washington on July 21-23, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement
for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses-incurred
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
I-'
I
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (continued)
(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-94, authorizing Fred A. Harper,
General Manager, to sign all contracts and documents not required
to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. See
page "I"
(j) Consideration of motion granting temporary authority for payment
of overtime to Districts' Principal Accountant up to September 30,
1976, due to extended illness of other accounting staff personnel
DISTRICT 1
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for
right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk
sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $ i, 091. 00. See page "J"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(1) Considerations of actions relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer
pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "K"
(2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare draft
Environmental Impact Report relative to Raitt Street
Trunk Sewer
DISTRICT 2
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-105-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract
No. 2-14-3A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion. See page "L"
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-106-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract
No. 2-14-4A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion. See page "M"
DISTRICT 3
(o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Solomon Shapiro, dated May 20, 1976, in the amount of $50,000.00
in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor,
Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2,
and refer to the contractor and District's liability insurance
carrier for appropriate action
(p) Consideration of motion to deny leave to file late claim by
Karen L. Morton for lack of sufficient showing of excusable
neglect relative to a claim in connection with construction of
the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2,
as recommended by the General Counsel
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 5
(q) Consideration of actions relative to Back Bay Trunk Sewer
(East Side) pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing
the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "N"
(2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare
negative declaration declaring that the Bay Bay Trunk
Sewer (East Side) will not have a significant effect on
the environment and directing the filing of notice thereof
(r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids
for purchase of 24-inch Ductile Pipe for the Back Bay Trunk
Sewer (East Side) , Contract No. 5-20A :i c.J/ l, "; i c (,, J tie. -Q
DISTRICT 6
(s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for
right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk
sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,521.00. See page "0"
DISTRICT 7
(t) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-108-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1.3834 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity of Arnapola Street
and Handy Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 52 -St. Arnand Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(u) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-109-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 11.165 acres to the District in
the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extended to a point
westerly of Santiago Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 49 -Tract
No. 8306 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-110-7, authorizing acceptance
of Grant of Easement from La Colina Associates, a California
Limited Partnership, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer
service in connection with a sewer line southwesterly of the
intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue, at no cost
to the District. See page "P"
(w) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-111-7, approving and authorizing
execution of agreenent with Lerner Oil Company, Inc. for right of
way in connection with Contract No. 7-3A-4A, Sub-Trunks; authorizing
payment in the amount of $1,800.00; and accepting Grant of Easement
in connection with said right of way. See page "Q"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
-5-
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
. (10) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to
receive and file the Committee's written report
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
Committee:
(a) Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget:
(1)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
Consideration of motion approving 1976-77 personnel
requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 76-97 amending
Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-167 (Copy of
resolution in Directors' -meeting folders)
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77
ROLL CALL VOTE .............. -Joint Operating Budget
(b)
(c)
Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance
to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor
for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30,
1976, and declaring.that such certification shall comply with
the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures
for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1976-77
budgets are adopted by the respective Districts
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive
bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for Security
Monitoring System, Specification No. PW-054, for an amount
not to exceed $13,000 for installation and maintenance for the first
year, plus cost of annual maintenance thereafter
Consideration of motion approving concept of value engineering
procedures relative to the design of 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with Federal and·
State guidelines, to provide cost-effective design of said facility
(d) Discussion re amending connection charge ordinances in Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 to permit waiver of all or portion of connection
fees under special circumstances.
(e) Consideration of motion approving nominations of Frances Wood, Chairman,
District No. 3, (member) and Fred A. Harper, General Manager, (alternate)
as the Districts' representatives on the Southern California Association
of Governments 208 Program Committee
~ (12) ALL DISTRICTS
Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "R"
~e. lL~ ·-~·.:'' ,,._ ljj(_ ~<'/
-6-
(13) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8 & 11
Hearing on proposed Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County:
(a) Open hearing
(b) Report of General Counsel
(c) Actions to date:
(1) Resolution No.-76-90, setting time and place of hearing adopted
on May 12, 1976 by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
(2) Notice (resolution) published May 21, 1976 (Districts 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11) Santa Ana Register
(3) Notice published May 28, 1976 (District 8) Daily Pilot
(4) Notice of hearing, resolutuion and copy of Code mailed to'
affected parties on May 28, 1976 or June 1, 1976 ,\ '
Roll can Vote or cast (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-99 adopting Conflict of Interest
Unanimous Ballot Code. See page "S"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(a)
(b)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, dated May 25, 1976, in
connection with JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility. See page "T"
Consideration of Resolution No. 76-98, authorizing amendment to the
contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re
JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services from
$333,726 to $353,726 for additional pre-design work. See page "U"
(15) DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11
Consideration of the following resolutions amending Section 1, Subsection (b),
of the annexation policy resolutions of the respective Districts providing
for the change indicated below:
Roll Ca?! Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
(a) DISTRICT 2
(b) DISTRICT 3
(c) DISTRICT 5
(d) DISTRICT 7
(e) DISTRICT 11
Resolution No.
76-100-2
76-101-3
76-102-5
76-103-7
76-104-11
Amending Resolution No.
75-42-2
75-43-3
75-15-5
75-44-7, as amended
75-49-11
Delete sentence: "The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the
annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per
acre hereinabove established."
Add sentence: "The date of payment of annexation acreage fee to the
District shall govern the amount of the fee per acre
hereinabove established."
-7-
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 1
(19)
Roll Call Vote or Cast
Unanimous Ballot
-.
(20)
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-117-2, authorizing acceptance
of Grant of Easement from Calprop Corporation for a permanent easement
in connection with the realignment of Yorba Linda Force Main (from
Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard), Contract No. 2-16-2, and authorizing
payment in the amount of $7,000.00 for said easement.
DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn :
1
, ,~
(22) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 3 (23)
Consideration of motion to adjourn '~i,1
'
(24) DISTRICT S
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's memorandum
Roll Call Vote or Cast dated June 3, 1976; and approving Resolution No. 76-112-8, confirming
Unanimous Ball~t the substitution of South Coast County Water District as a member agency
i_i ,,,. :.' of the Districts in place of South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to
~c \:\,_{} '• ~~~ pro~~~ions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730. See pages "V"
tl \ ~~-(29,) DISTRICT 8
v Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to adjourn r 'i )
(31) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
-8-
(32)
'L (33)
(35)
DISTRICT 11 Cj • -vi Consideration of motion to adjourn 1 ,
DISTRICT 7
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Lazy B
Estates, Inc. for annexation of approximately 107.876 acres
of territory to the District in the Orange Park Acres area between
Randall Street and Amapola Avenue and refer to staff. See page "X"
(b) Discussion of Lazy B Estates, Inc. request for waiver of fees for
portion of proposed annexation
DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn q ,1-Y
-9-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
June 3, 1976
NOTICE OF REGUlAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1) 2) 3) SJ 6) 7) 8) & 11
WEDNESDAY~ JUNE 9) 1976) 7:30 P.M.
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, California,
will be held at the above hour and date.
Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
DIRECTORS' ORIENTATION MEETING -Wednesday, June 16, 1976, 5:30 p.m.
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-29·10
962-2411
Post Ottice Box 8127 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Cal if ., 92708
Telephones:
JOINT BOARDS
June 9, 1976 -7:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the mor e important,
non-routine items which appear on the enc losed agenda and which
are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are now enc losed
with the agenda material, summarizing the bills paid since the May
Joint Board meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 8-a -Approving Change Order No. 1 to Job No. J-6-lB.
In September, 1974, one bid was received for the furnishing
of the equipment and the installation of additional pumping
facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. Th~ Boards
rejected this single bid and instructed the staff to procure the
neces sary equipment under separate equipment contracts and sub -
sequently award a contract for the installation of said equipment .
Bids were received concurrently for the f urnishing of the engines ,
as well as the pumps and gear drives. Later it was discovered
that to mitigate the vibration problems of the engines to be
located on the second floor of the Outfall Booster Station,
22-inches of additional foundation were required for stabilizat ion.
The pump manufacturer quoted .the pump shafts based on a
shorter length, and a change order for the additional 22 -inches
is required to meet the final design installation. It is the
staff's recommendation that this change order in the amount of
$11,958.92 for the additional pump extens ions be approved.
No. 9-c -Acceptance of Job No. J-6-lC.
This contract to provide two tilting disc check valves for
the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster
Station is now complete. The supplier has furnished the required
equipment under this contract . The action appearing on your a g enda
authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion.
No. 9-d -Change Order No. 1 -Brookhurst Street Improvements,
Job No. P2-8-8.
This cooperative street improvement project at Plant No . 2
between the Districts and the City of Huntington Beach initially
--~
included in the original bid the installation of street lights,
underground wiring and appurtenant electrical pull boxes . In
Addendum No. 1 to the bid proposal, the st-reet light ing facilities
were deleted at the request of the City because of contractual
difficulties with the Southern California Edison Company. Now
that these contractual agreements have been consummated, the
City has requested that the street lights be included in the
project by change order in the amount of $13,600.22. The cost
will be part of the City's responsibility on this project. It
is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that this change order
be approved.
No. 8-e -D.etermining Prevailing Wage Rates for ·con:str·uction
Work by Outside Contractors.
The State Government Code requires that we adopt, periodically,
a resolution determining the prevailing labor rates for public
works construction contracts. Since this resolution is quite
lengthy, it is not included in the agenda material although it will
be available for inspection at the meeting. It should be em pha sized
that this resolution does not establish wage rates for our employees;
it involves only employees of contractors engaged in construction
work for public projects.
No. 8-f -Financial Report.
Included with the agenda material is the Districts' Financial
Report for the nine-month period ended March 31st . The Director
of Finance is recommending several budget transfers for reasons
stated in the report. If any Director has questions concerning
the Financial Report and the recommended budget transfers, please
call either Wayne Sylvester~ the Districts' Director of Finance,
or Fred Harper, telephone 5~0-2910.
No. 8-g -General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel
at Meetings.
For the past several years, the General Manager has been
authorized, on an annual basis, to designate mem bers of the Board
and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, etc., within the
State, which he believes will be of value to the Districts. It
is recommended that this authorization be renewed.
No. 8-h -AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management ,
July 21-23.
The Districts' Director of Finance has been invited to parti-
cipate in a scheduled AMSA technical conference on finance and
management for wastewater agencies to be held in Seattle July
21~23. It is the staff's recommendation that the authorization
be given for participation in this meeting.
-2-
7
No. 8-i -Authorization for Execution of Specified Documents.
From time to time, we are required to submit proof that the
General Manager has authority to execute documents on behalf of
the Districts. The resolution appearing in the agenda specifying
this authorization has been prepared by the General Counsel. It
is our recommendation that the resolution be approved.
No. 9-j -Authorizing Payment of Overtime .for Supervisory
Accounting Personnel.
During the past month, key accounting emplo yees have been
absent from work due to extended illnesses. This situation has
resulted in the need for other accounting personnel to work over-
time. Since this particular time of the year ·requires the closing
of the books as well as the preparation of the budge ts for the
coming year, we are r eque sting a uthority to pay overtime to
supervisory personnel to avoid hiring additional people on a
temporary basis. This requested authorization will expire
September 30th.
District No. 1
No. 8-k -Document Maps for Sewer Right-of-Way.
The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to
verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity
of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems
within the District. Since the work involved little professional
judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order
for the work as outlined. ·The fees submitted from the five firms
were as follows:
(1) $1,091
(2) $2,400
(3) · $4,ooo
(4) $9,000
(5) $12,487
The staff had estimated that the cost for these outside
services would be approximately $2,000.
The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental
Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in
the amount of $1 ,091. They have indicated that they are completely
aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee as sub-
mitted. It is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that the
proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be
accepted.
-3-
District s Nos . 1 and 7
No. 8 -1 -Environmental Impact Assessment for Rai tt Street
Trunk Sewer Construction .
The actions appearing on the agenda initiate the preparation
of a draft Environmental Impact Report relative to the proposed
construc tion of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer . The trunk will
connect to the Districts' Sunfl ower facility and will cost about
$1.5 million. This facility is included in the Districts' Master
Plans.
Distri ct No. 2
No. 8 (m)-(n). Acceptance of Contracts Nos . 2-1 4 -3A and
2-14-4A.
The se contr acts were for t h e f urnishing of manho le f r ames
and c overs for Contracts Nos . 2 -1 4 -3 and 2-1 4 -4 , which are
presently under construction . The supplier has furnished al l
of t he mate rial re quired under the contract. The staff rec ommends
acceptance of the work and authoriz at ion to file a Notice of Com -
pletion.
District No . 5
No. 8 -q -Environme n tal Impact Report for Proposed Back Bay
Trunk Sewer.
. .
The actions appearing on the ' agenda relative to the preparation
of a ne gative environmental declaration for the construction of
th e Back Bay Sewer (east side) is pursuant to the District 's gu idelines
implementing the Environmental Qua lity Act of 1970 . Because the
area tributary to the sewer is presently 85% developed or approved
for development , the staff is recommending the preparation of a
negative environmental declaration.
No. 8-r -Authorization to Advertise and Receive Bids for
Purcha se of 24 -In ch Ducti l e Iron Pipe for Construct i on of t he
Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 5 -2 0A .
The Dis t rict's staff , working with the Department of Fish
and Game, have agreed that no construction will be done during
t he mi gratory foul breeding and storm seasons, ge nerally October
1 5 to March 1 . In order to construct this facility pr ior to
Oct o b er 15 , it is necessary to procure the ductile iron pipe re-
quired for this job because of the long lead time required for
manufacturing th i s mater i a l. It is anticipated that the con-
tract or will commence work on or about August 15th. It is
proposed that this pipe be purchased and furnish ed to the
-4-
-· ~
contractor to meet this tight construction schedule. It is
reconnnended that the Board authorize the advertisement and
receipt of bids for 8,600 feet of pipe at an engineer's estimate
of $250,000. It is recommended that bids for this material be
received on July 6th and award be made by the Board at the regular
July meeting.
District No. 6
No. 8-s -Document Maps for Sewer Right of Way.
The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to
verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity
of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems
within the District. Since the work involved little professional
judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order
for the work as outlined. The fees submitted from the five firms
were as follows:
(1) $1,521
(2) $3,699
(3) $4,000
(4) $7 ,500
(5) $12,487
The staff had estimated that the cost for these putside services
would be approximately $2,000.
The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental
Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in
the amount of $1,521. The firm has indicated that they are com-
pletely aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee
as submitted and it is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that
the proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be
accepted.
District No. 7
No. 8-t -Initiation of Proceedings for Proposed Annexation
No. 52.
The staff has reviewed the proposed annexation of 1.38 acres
located at 20202 Amapola Street in the vicinity of Orange Park
Boulevard and Amapola. This is an existing single family develop -
ment in the City of Orange and it is the staff's recommendat ion
that Resolution No. 76-108-7 authorizing initiation of annexation
proceedings be approved.
No. 9-u -Ordering Annexation No. 49, Tract No. 8306.
In October, 1975, the Board authorized the initiation of
annexation proceedings for Tract No. 8306 (City of Orange) to
annex approximately 11 acres in the vicinity of Santiago Road
-5-
extending to a point westerly of Santiago Creek. The property
will be divided into single family residentia l lots and the
wast ewater discharge will be consistent with the flows anticipated
b y the District 's Master Plan. We now have received approval from
the Local Agency Formation Commission and the proponent has paid
the District 's annexation fees. The staff recommends adoption of
Resolution No . 76-109-7, ordering annexation.
No. 8-v -Acceptance of Sewer Easement.
Resolution No . 76-110-7 accepts an easement for a local sewer
con structed in a private street in the vicinity of La Colina Drive
and Browning Avenue . It is recommended that the ac t ion authorizing
acceptance of this easement , at no cost to the District , be approved.
No . 8 -w -Acceptance of Sewe r Easement from Lerner Oil
Co mpany, Inc., Contract No. 7 -4A.
It has been recently discovered that when a subtrunk sewer ,
Contract No. 7-4A, was constructed through a private right of way
be tween El Camino Real and "B" Street in the City of Tustin in
1963, the proper sewer easement was not obtained. The staff and
Gen eral Counsel have met with the attorneys for the Oil Company,
and it has been mutually agreed that a fair market value for this
e asement is $1 ,800. It is, ther efore, recommended that Resolut i on
No. 76 -1 11 -7 be approved authorizing acceptance of this easement
and payment to Lerner Oil Company , Inc., in the amount of $1 ,800 .
Joint Boards
Nos. 10 and 11 -Report of the Executive Committee .
The Committee met on June 1st and enclosed for the Dir ectors
is a written report of their discussions and recommended items for
consideration by the Boards .
No. 12 -Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman.
As provided in the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure, nominations
for these two offices are made at the regular June meeting , with
elections to take place at the July regular Joint Board meeting . For
the new Directors' information, we have included in the supporting
documents section of the agenda material, an excerpt fro m the Rules
of Procedure for Meetings relative to the election of the Chairman
and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
No . 13 -Hearing on Proposed Conflict of Interest Code for
District Directors and Specified Employees .
Pursuant to the Boards' authorization in May , a public hearing
is scheduled Wednesday evening on the proposed Conflict of Interest
-6-
,_
.,-
Code for the County Sanitation Districts. Copies of the Code
have been mailed to all Directors and affected employees. As
of this date, no written cow.ments have been received . If any
Director has any questions concerning the Code's provisions,
please call the Districts' General Counsel, Tom Woodruff, (714)
835-6212.
No. 14 -Amendment to NASA Contract, JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant
Facility.
At the April 14th Board meeting, the Board amended the
original contract entered into with National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory of California
Institute of Technology to provide the necessary services for
the design, start-up and o p erational phases of the 1-MGD Pilot
Plant Facility from $280,000 to $333,726. There was an apparent
oversight of a $20,000 effort made in April and May, 1975, which
should have been considered in this revised contract amount.
Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter from the Pasadena
Office of NASA detailing the oversight by not including this
$20,000 effort. It is the staff's recommendation that the amended
contract amount with NASA should be adjusted to $353,726.
Districts 2,3,5,7,11
No. -15 -Amending Annexation Policies.
The staff is recommending that the provisions for payment
of the annexation fees be amended to read that the date of payment
of annexation fees govern the amount of the fee payable. Currently,
the fee is determined as of the date of the formal annexation
approval by the Board of Directors. This creates problems, in
that, on July 1st of each year, the annexation fee chang es, based
on the assets and liabilities of the Districts on that date; there-
fore any pending annexations are subject to increases in fees. The
recommended change in lang uag e would permit a proponent to pay
currently-established fees at the time of application for annexa-
tion. The staff recommends the adoption of the amending resolu-
tions listed on the agenda.
District No. 2
No. 19 -Acquisition of Permanent Easement for Realignment
of the Yorba Linda F orce Main.
During the course of construction of Contract No. 2-16-2, the
Yorba Linda Force Main from Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard,
the contractor encountered a large storm drain which interferes
with the construction of the sewer as originally proposed. This
-7-
--______:;i
obstruction has forced the realignment of the sewer to a position
which requires acquisition of a permanent easement on private
prope rty. The staff has negotiated with Calprop Corporation for
the required easement and recommends payment in the amount of
$7,000 for the right of way .
District No . 8
No. 28 -Substitution of South Coast County Water District
as a Member Agency of District No . 8 .
The General Counsel is r ecommending that the Board adopt
Resolution No . 76-112 -8, confirming substitution of the Sout h
Coas t County Water District as a member agency of District No. 8
in place of the South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to the
provi s ion s of the Health and Safety Code, Section 4730. This
ac tion i s the result of the consolidation of the Sanitary District
with the Water District .
District No . 7
No. 33 -Request for Annexation -Lazy B Golf Course.
The District has r eceived an annexation requ est from the
owners of Lazy B Estates , Inc., in the Orange Park Acres area
lying betwe e n Randal l Str eet and Amapola Avenue , consisting of
approximately 108 acres. The owners have re q u ested that 50 .51
acres of the annexation be exempt from annexati on fees because
the areas will not be developed to contribut e any sewage flow to
the sanitary sewer system . Th e requested "exemp ted area " will
be a golf course, driving r ange and equestrian trail . In 1972,
a simil ar request was g rant ed by the District No . 2 Board to the
City of Anaheim to exempt a public golf course in the Anaheim
Hills area. The exemption agreement prov id ed that in the event
any of the exempted land required sewer service, the area to be
developed would b e subj ec t to fees equal to then applicable
District anne x a tion charges and any other fees that may be in
effect at that time.
The staff is requesting the Boar d's direction in this matter .
Because of the private ownership status of the r equested exempt
property, the staff feels this would b e extremely difficult to
administer and to coll ect fees due the District if and when the
land use would change on any portion of the 50 acres .
-8-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRESS REPORTS
MAY 3 1 , 1 976
ENGI NEERI NG DEPAR'I'lvIENT
CorvcRF·1-c
FINISH wo£K,
C/\ULK I NG
JO
f-.flA,p
t(-~
( x ) '<_>
q 8 r '
t1:P1.C:1r-
R ·co I
C Ros~ co t..L.E<;TrOIJ
S ys n:: f\'\ ~E" I t-i ~
/l\)STl\1..Lt!:.D.
..5CLIM co t_l.CC.TDKS
) 10.s,-A. u..F...D
2
4
6
8
/0
I Z
14
I
5 4 3 2 I
.
.c-PUf'·\f-'$ Ai\J D r' />'.-'/)
-iiJG /tJ-:;-f.l\LL[ ~
I
3
5
7
9
JI
13
1Et OND AR Y CLAR/FIERS
. "-"
Pvftli>.s
AND H i;::A/
Exe l1MJG(:f:;:.
SE1 iJ:; PI F~P 4 ~
AERATI ON BA$1N1
D
oool2. p_wD rP.-::iA.
p l\tJ ELS. l ~<;;'TP..L Lf'.D
POWEK BUILDING
50 __ MG D .ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
C ONTRACT " NO . P1 .~1.6
C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1.-t6
SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT
Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor
STARTING DATE: June 27, 1974
$29,876,000.00
$25,779,272.77
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14' 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 197T
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
PAID TO DATE:
Contract is for the construction of Activated
Sludge secondary treatment facilities at Plant No.
l. The new faci Zities UJi zi aid the Districts in
meeting m::r.ndated State and Federal ocean discharge
requirements.
lJJith Pl.ant No. 2 effluent at the outfal Z booster
station, improving the overall quality of water
pumped th.i'iough the outfalZ system into the ocean.
Significant structures included in the contract
are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second-
ary CZa.rifiers, °f:;?Jlo Digesters, Waste Sludge Thick-
eners and the Poweia Bui Zding.
When completed, the secondary trieatment system
ll>iZZ process the SO mgd of wastewater flowing
tlwough Plant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then blend
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work in the blower· building has been minimal. The
exterior sliding doors have been installed and the
interior walk thru door jambs are being set.
Work on the Aeration Basins has consisted primarily
of concrete finish work including caulking.
The sludge collection system is being installed in
the Secondary Clarifiers. Handrailjng continues to
be installed. Pumps are being placed in the Return
Sludge Pump Station.
Interior door frames and handrail have been installed
in the Waste Sludge Thickeners.
Work in the Digester area consists of piping installa-
tion in the control building and tunnels.
~~T~·-.. ~~~~~ ~w~~~~__,.
I tUu.
'---------·· -------'
JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2.PW-04?
( . ,
CONTRACT PW~045
....
JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
'STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: ~
PAID TO DATE: x
Contract is for construction of a one million gal-
lon per dCi.y pilot wastewater treatment pl.ant at
flastmJater Treatment PZant /,'o. 2. The pl.ant vi7:l
use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System
(ACXS) developed by the Natior.a.l Aeronautics and
Space-Agency 's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This
tl-eatment method was perfected in its experimental
stages 7.Jith a mobile resecwch unit opero.ted by JPL
personnel. at the Di,str;~cts' Wasteu:ater Treatment
P'lant No. l in Fozmtain VaZ.Zey during 1974-75.
& system uses sludge removed from the ZJaStewater
to produce activated carbon through a pyrolysis
reac!tor. The activated ca:rbon is then reintro-
duced into the wastewater stream in a seconclary
stage for additional rerrova."L of pol.Zutants. Only
. . partia7:ly used after the second stq.ge~ tfie activa-
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976
ted carbon and secondary sludge slurry is fed in to
the inao'ming 1.Jast~ater stream to increase system
efficiency o
The mobile experimental wzit used to refine this
system from laboratory bench experiments UJas batch
operated 7.Jith mechanica"L handlir.g of rrateria"l from
stage to stage. The pilot plant wi"Ll be a contin-
uous"Ly run, a:r..1.tomated system.
As a prime objective of the ACI'S, it could solve
an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this
TTrLterial, becomes more plentiful with i.--rrproved
7.Jast&,ater treatment and increased flows. In ad-
dition, the effluent from this treatment system is
e:r:p-eated to meet the discharge requirements of
the Districts' N.P~D.E.S. permit •
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Contractor completed final billing with exception
of telephone, reproducing machine and office time
fo~ last week of May. District staff working with
equipment suppliers on correcting problems associ~ted
with several pieces of equipment.
xa?iis controct is a design and construct contract L.'hcreby the contracto1"
i.8 paid $50, 000. 00 p"Lus the actual costs for ai"L labor and materials.
IMPER IA '=-I
I ...,.I
I
I
I
/Ji I
Z!2!!£!!&kfi I
I
I
I
I
~· WI >a <ea
I
l<E l L 0 Ge;, DR. I . I
I
I
-rRtNJOAO s.,.. I
I
I
I
<ti
:El Ja ct:g
LAKE VtEW a.I
. Fa£ ANA ==:=:::::::::====t===~
RIC.HFIELD I -=====::;======~·
o\S1. 2
..
CONTRACT 2 -:-14-3
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER 6 SOUTH SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4
John A. Artukovich Sons·, Inc., Contractor
ST AR Tl NG DATE : 0 ct . 15, 19 7 5
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $ 3, 814, 4 6 2. 00
PAID TO DATE: $9 30, 384. 00
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Nov. 12, 1977
0 Calendar Days
Nov. 12, 1977
Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125
mile reinforced concrete pipe trunk line sewer a-
long La Pa Zma Ave. f mm Grove St. to Imperia Z Hwy.
in J.naheim.
aection of 33" diameter vitrified clay pipe is
designed to receive flou;s from the South F;foer
Trunk, serving Santa. Ana Canyon. I-li th the comp Zc-
tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa Ar.a Can-
yon pumping station can be abandoned.
!rhc first one-third of the project uses 51" diam-
eter pipe, the balance is 48 11•
Also included in the contract is a lateral con-
necto1' tine to the Santa Ana River Interceptor
aystem from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a-·
long Impei-ial /JZJJy. to La. Palma Ave. This 2'150'
Thie section of the interceptor system is dcsigr.ed
to handle up to 35 million gaUons flow per day.
Included in this figure is 30 l-lGD allou;ance for
accepting future high brine wastewater fl(}U)s from
San Bernardino and Riverside Countieso
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Work is progressing very well on this job with the
cont~actor laying an average 180 feet of pipe per
day. The pipe heading has just passed La Palma
·Avenue and Coronado Avenue. Back-end cleanup on this
job is being handled very well, and the City of
Anaheim is pleased w~th the progress and traffic
handling measures.
The contractor laid 2,727 feet of pipe during the
month. '
..
PRIVATE RO.
WE.1 R CANYON RO.
DIST. 2
'!er zz COMP LE'I'E
---..., TO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 2 -14.:. 4
CONTRACT 2 -14-4
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER~ REACH 5
Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor
' STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 1975
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4,240,957.00
PAID TO DATE: $3,475,544.00
Contract is foI' const:ructfon of a 5.1 mile long
section of re-z:nf o:rced concrete pipe trunk line
sewer from Imperial, Ewy. aZong La Palma Aveo in
JJUZheim, traversing the new 101•ba Regional Pcaik to
JieiI' Canycn Rd. The Pight-of-way then crosses the
Santa hia River at · b.:Jo places as it traverses ~
county terr>itorrzJ through Santa Ana Valley Irriga-
'tion Co. and Bryant Ranch properties to Gypsum Rd.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7
Depending or.. design criteria, various sections of
this line use 42, 45 and 51 inch diameter pipe.
This nection ~'>ill handle flows up to 32 million
gal. Zons per dayo Induded in this figure is 30
J.JGD al ZotJance for accepting future high brine
wastelJJater flows from San Bernardino arul Riverside
Counties.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
The contractor is making good progress on this contract
in spite of problems encountered with soil conditions not
indicated on the soi~s report. He laid 3,081 feet of pipe
during May and has completed pipe laying for all but the
two river crossings on the north end of the job. Excessive
water caused by soil-conditions has necessitated laying a
three to four foot thick rock bed under the pipe joints as
they are installed, vs. a normal one foot layer. This
condition exists primarily from the upper river crossing
to the north end of the job. The contractor will submit
a claim for extra work due to these conditions.
The concrete foundation pad for encasing the pipe u~der
the upper river crossing is complete. Pipe will be installed
at this cros~ing during the first week in June, encased,
covered over, and the river bed returned to its normal path
so excavation can begin under the diversion channel.
Simultaneously, the contractor will begin trenching operations
at the southern terminus of the job at Imperial Highway and
La Palma Avenue during the first week in June.
r
~ ..... ~...,_,+.11~ l\.~CO.V#\+~~
. '''"~A..
----
CONTRACT No.
2-14-5
z
0
U')
COAL CANYON RO.
GYPSUf'/\
CANYON RD.
SANTA ANA
CANYON RD.
CONTRACT 2-i4-5
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER
REACHES 6, 7 & 8
S. S. Zarubica; Con tractor
STARTING DATE: Nov. 27, 1975
ORIGIN.AL CONTRACT: $2, 0 96, 6 76 • 15
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept• 21, 19 76 . PAID TO DATE: $667, 694. 45
Contract is for the construction of ·a 2. 4 mile
Zeng section of reinforced conc-rete pipe Zina seu>-
er. The tine goes through the San ta Ar.a Canyon
from hlhere Contract No. 2-14-4 ends in about the
center of the BriJant Ranch property, along the
route of the Santa Ana River and through the
no-::•thern portion of the G1 1 een River Golf Course to
t=1ie CountlJ Line. The Zine terminates in a controi
cmd meterir.g structure designed to measure fl.OWB
from the upper basin counties.
The line consists of 45, 42, and :59-inch diameter
sections of pipe. Th~ diafr.eters ch.aY.~e in rela-
tion to design requirc~ents. This cection of the
San.ta Ana River Interceptor system will handle
flows of approxir.-ately 32 miHion gallons per Wd·
Included in this figure is 30 NGD all(}l;)ance for
accepting futu:I'e high brine wastewater flows from
San Bernar·dino and Riverside Counties.
.•
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
The contractor has cleared brush and trees fro~ the right-
of-way from the northern most river drossing to the
southern terminus of the job and graded an access road for
most -of this distance. 250 feet of pipe were l'aid during
May.
Structural construction is complete on the mete.ring structure,
and cleanup work is. proceeding very well.
Planning continues with management of the Green River Golf
Course for restoration of a tee in the pipe laying right-of-way
that was .destroyed during trenching operations and landscaping
.and grading along the golf course north boundary.
\
An unspecified problem continues to delay installation of
electrical service to our contractor on the west side of the
·upstream river crossing for powering dewatering pumps at that
location. The contractor has moved downstream to a point
opposite the north end of Featherly Regional Park and is
dewatering there, using portable generators, in preparation
for trenching operations. Trenching should begin during the
first week in June.
Two power poles in the righ-of-way are scheduled to be moved
by Edison Company during the first week in June. These poles
are within a short distance of where the c~ntractor has
chosen to begin trenching.
'
·o IS T. __ . 2 __
CONTRACT No. 2-15
(\
~
~
" ()
~
~ BLVD.
~
~
tu
'4J ~
"' " ~
GAL STATE ~ULLE.RTON ~
CAMPUS ~
L . .
CONTRACT No. 2-15
YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Hentk Pro,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146 ." 00
PAID TO DATE: $693, 462. 99
Contract is· for the construction. of a reinforced
concrete structure to house wet we Us and pwr.ps
for tlunsfe11ring tributaPJ LXJ.stewater though a
force rrain Zin~ into· the Santa Ana River, Carbon
Caayon Inte11 ceptor-re Uef T2?Unk Line system for -
conveycrnce to f·lasteZJater Reclaniation Plant Noo 1
in l:'oudain VaUey. This LJiE assist in relieving
the presently congested N~~hope-Placentia Trunk
Line and. will serve proposed land use development
of the tributary area to the year 2010.
The pzgnp station str~cture is located at the in-
tersection of Yorba Linda Boul-evard and Assoaio:ted
Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on
CONTRACT. COMPLETION DATE:
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED:
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE:
Sept. 22, 1976
81 Calendar Days
Dec. 10, 1976
uhat was originally VniversitlJ of California, Ful-
lerton. p11 operty at the northern perimeter of the
campus. SpeciaZ arrangements were 17Yl.de u;ith the
University for use of the property.
The above-ground portion of the structure ZJi ZZ. be
a low profile slab 85' x 109 ', 2 feet above
ground. Th.e deepest portion of the structure wil:l
'l?e 35 feet wuler the ground. The District has
agreed to const1?Uct a sZwnp-stone fence a'!lound the
structure and landscape the area in acco11 dance
?Ji.th fu,ture compatible use by the University. The
University plans to construct an arboretum in the
mediate area at some future date.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Construction and equipment installation is
complete. Final testing is· underway.
7 N
DIST. 2
I' •c.1. •• CCMPIETE
.. ,. -., • 'IO BE CO ~.3'1.'RUCI'ED
CONTRACT No. 2-16-2
. .
CONTRACT 2-16-2
YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO
KRAEMER BOULEVARD
Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor
STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976,
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: _.$660,287.98
PAID TO DATE: $530,907.68
Co;;-t~ct is for construction of a 1. 4 mile sewer
fo'I'Ce main of 30-ir.ch ductile iron pipe. This
line wiZZ caITY se?Jage pwnped from the Yorba Linda
Pump Station at Yorba Lind.a Boulevard and Associ-
ated Road in FuUerton to a reach of the Santa Ana ·
River Tnmk line system at Palm Drive and Kmer::er-
Boulevard in Placentia.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Da.ys
PROJECT~D COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
This force main and the pump station are designed
to relieve the presently eor.gestcd NaJhcpe-PZccen-
tia Trunk Line. It wi Zl serve proposed Zand use
develop!.nent of the tributary area to the year 2010 •.
The force rr.ain is desigr.ed to accept up to 15 mil-
lion gaZZons per day flows.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
We reported last month that a pit had been left open at the
intersection of Placentia Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard
for access to the pipe tunneled under Placentia and grouting
operations around that pipe. The contractor did not wish
to perform air tests and grouting of the tunnel on the
completed portion of the pipe, allowing closing the pit, until
the entire line was completed. Work has been shut down on the
job at the order of the Supervising ~ngineer· until the contractor
complies with orders to perform the requested air testing, and
close the pit, which interferes with the business of a gas
station on that corner.
Tunneling under the freeway was allowed to continue and is
now complete. Pipe is being installed.
The portion of the line that came in conflict with an 86-inch
storm drain in.-Sapphire Road discovered to be inaccurately
·located on the job plans has been redesigned and will be
constructed by the contractor at an added cost to the District
of $11,761.80. Basically, this will require lowering about
two feet to clear the storm drain over a 600 foot portion of
the job.
~,~O\\ ~~A
\V\4S~\\~"\-\4fl
u~~ wo.r
JI .... . .. ~
____:-----d
a,, ~1 .o<;. ~ ""°'''--~~
C4'V' ~v e"-t ~ ~ \¥
c,.~~ . ~ ~\\ '~'"'
V\ Q*~ ~ -a..\' °'" .
~ ~
~
~ ~
LINCO'C~ . . . AVE IL
D ~
OEL CITY OJ: -ANAl-/EIM MOll'f4
~·· OLINDA
~r.· ~r,1· ;
()RANGE ~ AVE. tl
N
~
~
ROAD
CITY or
Bl/ENA \....
PA!?K ~
~
~
CERll 1 .,,,,..,4':
I ". --di AVE ~ . I --
CITY
DIST. 3
... ... .. .. OP-~. P. ,. 4 .
·-. l' .
'I SYRACUSE.
CYPRESS
--• COMPLETE ll ~
/('A/ELLA I:' AVE. -
..-anll!illlTO BE CONSTRUCTED
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
STARTING DATE:
CONTRACT No. 3-20-2
KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7
A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co.,
A Joint Venture, Contractor
CONTRACT-COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
March 6, 1975
"$3,876,870.00 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE: $3,854,643.50 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 19 76
Contract is for instaZlation of a Reinf oraed Con-
crete Pipe (R. C.P.) sewer Zir.e from a point 1200
feet south of Kate ZZa Avenue on Knott Avenue in
Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
in Ana.heim, a distance of 2. 3 miie.<>. P"~pe diame-
t.ers are '12" for the first 3, 900 feet, 53" for
6, 900 feet and 66" for the re.rr.ainiri.g 1200 feet of
the project. FZows from this reach w-iZ Z dmin in-
to Contract 3-20-1 to the south.
congested NiZZer-lloZ.der Trunk Sewer ·by intercep-
ting fl,ow.s from the nortfa.Jest portion of District
J. The southerly terminus of the system is at the
intersection of Brookhurst Street and ElZis Avenue
in F_ountain Valiey. It wiZl eventually e:ctend to
ImperiaZ Avenue in la Habra.
This portion of the relief system is designed to
hand"le a flow of 68 million gallons per day and
fJill. serve the proposed deve"loped Zand use plan in
the tributary area to the year 2010. This projeat is a portion of the Knott Interceptor
reZief system designed to relieve the presently
. ·~ ..
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Tunneling under Lincoln Avenue is ccmpleted and
pipe is in. Grouting operations are underway.
The contractor began excavation for the last 150
feet o~ pipe.north of Lincoln Avenue the first
week in June.
The paving subcontractor continues to repair bad
paving ~nstallation in the area from Ball Road
north to Lincoln Avenue. First course paving is
in in this area.
The City of Anaheim is conducting TV checks of an
8-inch sewer line that was replaced in parallel with
installation of the larger pipe. It appears there are
cracks, broken joints and settling in portions of the
line between Ball Road arid Lincoln Avenue. This will
have to be repaired before final paving is installed
in that area .
CRESC.ENT II AVE.
==================~.
LINCOLN l AVE.
-.asma=-----~ Am 11:9
... ___ _
I
.... I
I l-l.tJ I . LU w a: I l&J
er t-1 \-U>I ORANG£ U) AVE •
.. I .
I
-1 > ~~ a
~i 0
0
'
~! BALL ~ RD.
~ I
·i ! ?ARBON C~EEK
--;:-::.: .. Ii · ....... ~ ...... ~--· . :-.......... ~ ... ~ ... .,.·: .... :.-·'.•.). ·;_ ·-·
ti I ·-...._; /viY R A i
C~ANNEL
Av£.
~ MARION I
CERRITOS .
EXERCISE I
TRACK""--_ -,1.--~STABLE$
~ 1lt I -----.---5.P.R.R.
_ ~~11111111! i I! 11111Iii1111111111111~
11 ARROWHEAD 1.
1
MF=G. CO. I 1
DIST. 3
-mamm.-TO BE CONSTRUCTED
_ -__ -:1 KAT£LLA AVE.
CONTRACT No.
3-21-2
CONTRACT 3-21-2
WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29
B & P Const.ruction Company, Contractor.
STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,177,745.00
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24, 1976
TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PAID TO DATE: $122,214.50 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' ·1976
::ontmct is for construction of a 2. 75 mile sec-Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. This system
is deDigned to re Zieve the Los Alamitos Sub tmnk,
which at p1,esent functions as the rrain sewer for
the westside basin. · For the most pcn:•t, this line
is currently flo.JJ-Z:ng at or near peak capa.cib::;1.
This c:ection is designed to handle flows Hp to
6.32 million gallons per d:i.y ar.d will aerJe pro-b
posed land use plans in the tributary to the year
· .. -:on of vitrified clay pipe t-y•w-zk line sewer
: :;rough the City of. ClJpres s from Kate Ua Avenue in
_ :.::; Alamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De--
~ .:xding on design cri tieria, the pipe line is in
· ;..Y'ious sizes from 15" to 30" in diameter.
section of line will complete the rra.ster-
.. · .. ~::. i~·cstside Re lief Interceptor sewer that be-
::~ ihe Seal Beach Blvd. Pwnping Station at
2010. .
----
·ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
' Th~ contractor broke ground and laid 1,003 feet of
pipe during May .. The pipe heading is now in the
vicinity of Myra Avenue.
A jacking pit h~s been .excavated, and the contractor
is tunneling under the Carbon Creek Flood Control
Channel just north of Myra.
The contractor experienced some difficulty in meeting·
backfill soil composition and compaction specifications
in the early stages of the job. An acceptable blending
of sand and native soil was worked out and all material
placed in the trench meets specification·requirements.
~.
~
DIST. 7
COMPLETE
_ __.tfWALNUT II AVE. IL
~
8
4(
;z
4
~
ls.I
"'
.-=
c.J)
SPR\N C., I I ST.
{l
> -' ,,..,. :JJ
.it'
......,
.. l\ -·::~~~--: ;:·NTER -ST. ti--
DI llc£ARL ST. j~
CHAPlllAN JtDDIAvE. I[
,.:
oo~
1~01~
. ~
I-< '° :t _.
w
"71~
z
<(
_J
a..
»•(/)
~ <
uJ
WA~~\N~TON
P;.\ u .. 0
----TO BE CONSTRUCTED w
CONTRACT NO.
7-6 -8
~ll r=AtR~AVEN AYE.
fl
0
~
.'
CONTRACT 7:6-8
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 12, REACH 13 1
AND PORTION OF REACH 14
Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $512,892.00
PAID TO DATE: $520, 453 .. 00
Contract is for c.onstructing a 1. '18 mile section
of trunk lir.e Dewer of 21 and 27 inch diameter
vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in the Lerrrm Heights
area of Orange.
The line begins 1:n the vfoinity of Fairhaven Ave-
nue and Esp lar.ade Street, gees north on Esp Zanade
Street to Spring Street and east on Spring Street
to Santiago Boulevaad.
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976
\
This project is the final portion of the master--
planned Tustin-Orange T2"1mk LiYLe Relief SzJstem.
The system provides droiri.age for the central and
northern portions of District No. 7.
This sectwn is designed to handle flews up to
6. '12 million gallons per day and will serve pm-
posed Zand v.se deve fopment of the tributary area
to the year 2010.
ACTIVJTIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
Job complete
Project to be recommended for
acceptance at the July Board .
'
DIST. 7 -...
CONTRACT NO.
7-6-9
BONO AVE.
WALNUT 1--..:A~V~E~·~-fl-~-
SPR\N G
(/)
w
$
w
CHAPMAN :r
ST.
AVE.
II
cl
~1 <{
l-z
<{
CJ)
o.C.F'.C.D. --------------------
•
.·
CONTRACT 7-6-9
TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER
PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor
STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976
ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $295, 826. 40
PAID TO DATE: $36,750.00
This controct is th.e last reach of the m::ister-
planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer to be construc-
ted by the District. It consists of a 1. 5 mi.le
section of · vitr>ified clay pipe line varying from
· 18 to 21 inches in diameter.
Construction wiU begin at Santiago Boulevard and
Spring Street in Ora.hge and go north to Santiago
Canyon Road, where the project ends. The Zine
traverses portions of the City of Grange and un-
incorpon:r.ted County area afong its route.·
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 26, 1976
TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days
PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 26, 1976
This portion of the t:ru.nk sewer will connect into
an existing 18" sewer "line nau a.Jned by the City
of Orange. The upstr·ea.m system feeding to this
point is scheduled to be purcha.sed by the District
at a later date.
Designed f'louJ for this portion of the trunk line
system is 4.65 MGD, and will serve the _proposed
developed land use plan in the tributa.ry area to
the year 2010.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH
The contractor broke ground during the
in May. He has laid 350 feet of pipe.
progressing very well on this job with
operations following pipe installation
clos~ly. · ·
last week
Work -is
backfilling
very
J : SUMMARY
TREATMENT PLANT WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During May
DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK
Total Value Under Contract
Total Work to Date
Total Work During May
TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER ~ONTRACT
$31,311,934
26,720,851
1,394,613
$17,402,719
10,330,817
1,348,022
$31,311,943
$17,402,719
$48,714,662
·r
. RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
JUNE 9~ 1976 -7:30 P.M.
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO, "IN FAVOR OF ------
29629 Admiral Corporation, Sampling Equipment
29630 Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings
,9631 All Bearing Service, Inc., Pipe Supplies & Bushings
-..iit9632 American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
29633 V. B. Anderson, Small Tools
29634 Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Parts
29635 Banning Battery Company, Batteries
29636 Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating
29637 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts
29368 C & R Reconditioning Company, Engine Repair
29639 C S Company, Engine Parts
29640 Cal-State Seal Company, Seals
29641 Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
29642 Cam Auto Parts, Truck Parts
29643 Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil Removal
29644 Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware
29645 College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials
29646 Compressor Service, Compressor Parts
29647 Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
29648 Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine
29649 F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair
29650 Leelon Cory, Employee Mileage
29651 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
29652 Costa Mesa County Water District, Water
29653 Clarence S. Currunings, Employee Mileage.
29654 N. A. D'Arcy Company, Equipment Parts
29655 John M. Deck, Equipment Parts
29656 Derby's Topsoil, Paving Materials
29657 Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies
29658 Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage
29659 Envirotech-Sparling Division, Strip Charts
29660 Essick Machinery Co., Compressor Parts
29661 Fibre-Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Protective Coatings
29662 Fischer &'Porter Company, Strip Charts
29663 City of Fountain Valley, Water_
29664 Edward R. Francis, E-079 Inspection Travel Expense
29665 Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer
29666 General Telephone Company
29667 Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage
29668 Graybar Electric Comp~ny, Electric Supplies
29669 Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal
29670 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease
29671 Hightower Metal Products, Hardware
29672 Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope.& Valves
29673 Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental
29674 IDS Corporation, Office Supplies
29675 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water
29676 Karlee Company, Maintenance Supplies
29677 King Bearing, Inc., Hardware & Bearings
29678 Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware
29679 L. A. Liquid Handling Systems, Pwnp
29680 LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies
._..,9681 L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service
29682 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
29683 Lube Lift Equipment, Oil Tanks
"A-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
AMOUNT
392.20
121. so
178.90
4,783.59
169.60
31.80
401.08
368.35.
1,575.67
230.00
238.50
14 7 .13
45. 71
12.21
1,852.18
42.86
236.27
333.67
818. 54
1,548.55
909.88
8.25
22.84
6.00
16.35
34.46
43.46
318. 00
15.90
63.66
35.14
57. 72
163.40
55.32
40.00
200.40
360.40
77.40
54.90
509.65
105.00
743.51
26.50
802.21
37.10
291.92
1. 75
542. 72
299.60
32.44
157.94
67.25
1,110.01
17.85
585.92
"A-1"
WARRANT NO.
29684
29685
29686
29687
29688
29689
29690
29691
29692
29693
29694
29695
29696
29697
29698
29699
29700
29701
29702
29703
29704
29705
29706
29707
29708
29709
29710
29711
29712
29713
29714
29715
29716
29717
29718
29719
29720
29721
29722
29723
29724
29725
29726
29727
29728
29729
29730
29731
"A-2"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts
McGraw-Hill Publications Co., Technical Manuals
McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools
Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Testing Supplies
Moltronics Division, Electric Supplies
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers
National Chemsearch, Lubricant & Cleaner
City of Newport Bea~h, Water
Nolex Corporation, Printing Supplies
Nu-Day Tools, Tools ·
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies
Pacific Telephone Company
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Quality Building Supply, Building Materials
Quik Spray, Inc., Equipment Parts
Regents of University of California, 208 Planning Seminar
The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
Rewes-Schock, Contractor 11-lR-1
Ryan Herco, Pipe Supplies & Fabricating
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor
Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies
The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental
Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service
Southern Call.fornia Edison Company
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Standard Concrete Materials, Concrete
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil & Gasoline
Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies
The Suppliers, Tools
Thompson-Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies & Equipment Parts
Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts & Truck Repair
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Equipment Parts
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts
Al Ursic, Employee Mileage
Valvate Associates, Valve Parts
Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals
VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies
Varec, Inc., Digester Parts & Freight
Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage
John R. Waples, R. S., Odor Consultant
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 177.51
20.62
270.1'1
35.~
63.96
172. 94
2,470.96
620.10
5. 81
502.14
30.62
38.16
318.42
232.83
220.15
231.47
35.00
76.86
7,802.77
412.87
18.55
42.56
42.81
688.33
44.34
205.00
395.00
990.35
183.59
167.80
5,652.73
53.43
1,089.35
957.81
79.24
388.91
32.54
6.28
784.94
10.65
35.51
2,122.36
460.57
217.51
34.26
217.60
2,554.00
20.25
$ 52,577.76
"A-2"
WARRANT NO.
29613
29614
~ 29615
29616
29617
29618
29619
29620
29621
29622
29623
29624
29625
29626
29627
29628
"A-3"
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Belmont Engineering, Retention, PW~045
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, JPL ACTS & Fae. Plan
Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-079
Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16
E & G Contractors, Retention, PW-046
Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment
Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant
Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services, P2-8-8
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, PW-045
Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management, Pl-16
LBWS, Inc., Hydraulic Press & Tools
LFE Corporation, Retention, PW-045
Olympic Signs, JPL Signs
Southland Helicopter, Aerial Photos
Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16
F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
8,069.83
5,182.65
17.58
317,318.29
1,284.50
586.18
420.00
492 .11
171,034.73
22,887.36
3,462.95
10,159.00
215.18
160.00
25.00
4,725.00
$ 546,040.36
$ 598,618.12
"A-3"
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
·29594
29595
29596
29597
29598
29599
29600
29601
29602
29603
29604
John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3
Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing
J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15
Kasler Corp., & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4
Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3A
Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14, 2-15, 2-16-2
S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-2
County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2
A.G. Tutor Co., Inc 4 N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor ~-20-2 & 3-21-1
DISTRICT NO. 5
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29605 Simpson-Steppat, Civil Engineering Service Back Bay Trunk Sewer
DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29612 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
$
$
AMOUNT
159,048.00
226,320.51
257.59
6,033.60
1,004,164.95
1,297.44
40,334.62
277,342.38
1,714,799.09
1,077.00
568.92
187,557.36
$ 189,203.28
$ 6,800.00
270.00
"B II
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29606 State of California, Annexation 46 Processing Fee
29607
29608
29609
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8, 7-6-9
Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor 7-6-8
Cou~ty of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6~8
DISTRICT NO. 11
. ·oPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29610 State of California, Annexation 17 Processing Fee
ACCUMULATED ·cAPITAL-.OlITLAY FUND '."\4ARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
29611 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, Contractcr 11-4R
II c II AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
$
$
$
$
AMOlJNT
180.00
1,940.00
247,565.70
26.08
$ 249 ,53L 78
$ 249, 711. 78
$ 85 .. 00
634.98
719'. 98
II c II
J U l l'l 1 IJ 1 .::> l 1\ l \J l u \.., L J\ .l l'l v I I\ J. LI l'l n l L. J J .A. J 1 v
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
29746
29747
29748
29749
29750
29751
29752
29753
29754
29755
29756
29757
29758
29759
29760
29761
29762
29763
29764
29765
29766
29767
29768
29769
29771
29772
29773
29774
29775
29776
29777
29778
29779
29780
29781
29782
29783
29784
29785
29786
29787
29788
29789
29790
29791
29792
29793
29794
29795
29796
29797
29799
"D-1"
A-1 Metal Services Corp., Control Panels
All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Seals & Bushings
Aljac Supply Company, Tools
American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts
American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals
Ameron Corrosion Control Division, Cleaner
City of Anaheim, Power
Af.1SA, Conference Registration
Bank of America, Coupon Collection
Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Parts
Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Furniture
Belt Repair & Installation, Conveyor Repair
Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair
Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies
Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc.> Pre-employment Exams
Building News, Inc., Safety & Technical Manuals
Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material
Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies
Art Carr Transmission, Truck Repair
Catco, Inc., JPL Chemicals
College Book Company, Technical Manuals
Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies
Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Crown Controls, Inc., Controls
Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplie~
Daily Industrial Tools, Tools
Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling
Electric Switches, Inc., Electric Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring
Fischer & Porter Company, Pwnp Parts
Compressor Products Division, Compressor Parts & Repair
Frederick Pump & Engineering, Pump Parts
General Telephone Company
Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal
George T. Hall Company, Controls
Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts
Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires
Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Valve Repair
City of Huntington Beach, Permit Fee
ILG Industries, Duct Fan
Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
L A Truck Equipment, Truck Parts
LBWS, Inc., Tools, Welding Supplies & Hardware
L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service
Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing
Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals
National Chemsearch, Cleaner
National Lumber Supply, Tools a Hardware
City of Newport neach, Water
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner
Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies & Equipment Rental
AGENDA ITEM tr! -ALL DISTRICTS
..
AMOUNT
$ 383.r-
47.~
280.78
74.73
4, 931. 34
59.10
133.04
125.00
16.80
269.09
296. 22
325.15
2,868.60
44.55
78.00
182.17
79.55
94.26
201.50
1, 071. so
31.54
962.83
3,097.10
525.13
234.15
80.00
25.18
170.00
45.58
3,000.00
63.07
495.16
83.06
3,002.30
1,107.00
406. 77
40 •. 67
495.74
187.93
390.00
624.10
92.33
1,171.30
700.99
1,209.49
48.19
1,382.13
373.12
72.04
407.14
503.~
197.54
"D-1"
WARRANT NO.
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976
IN FAVOR OF
29800
29801
29802
~9803
29804
29805
29806
29807
29808
. 29809
29810
29811
29812
29813
29814
29815
29816
29817
29818
29819
29820
29821
29822
29823
29824
29825
29826
29827
29828
29829
29830
29831
29832
29833
29834
29835
29836
29837
"D-2"
Pacific Telephone Company
Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies
Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal
The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Supplies
Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts
Rockwell International, Calculator
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair
Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies
Scientific Products, Lab Supplies
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools
Southern California Edison Company
South Orange Supply, Hardware
Speede Speedometer, Truck Parts
Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil
The Suppliers, Tools & Hardware
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts
Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage ·
Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts
Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Retirement System Study
Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings
Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts
Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline
United Parcel Service, Freight-Out
United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Permit Printing
United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
Valley Towing, Truck Towing
Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage
Water Pollution Control Federation, Technical Manuals
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts
Westron Corporation, Electric Supplies
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John M. Wright, Employee Mileage
James Wybenga, Employee Mileage
Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing
Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service
Zodiac Paper Company, Repruduction Supplies
County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 475.70
220.48
64.00
136.42
395.37
28.51
455.22
303.30
301..94
48.65
13,206.63
53.69
6.37
1,281.62
153.59
32.12
66.42
42.43
3,000.00
53.00
495.35
19.27
20.02
288.08
33.00
607.57
30.00
36.30
198.51
233.30
334.08
2,046.00
22.50
35.46
3,422.94
1,310.74
99.87
... 262.89
$ 62,608.90
"D-2"
WARRANT NO.
29739
29740
29741
29742
29743
29744
29745
29837
"D-311
JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976 .
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING PUND WARRANTS
rN FAVOR OF
Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc., Tools
J. Putnam Hcnck, Contractor PW-045
Material Handling Supply, Shelving
P ~ S Repair Service, Contractor E-079A
Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent
Siernag Systems, Inc., Retention E-076
Utilities Supply Company, Tools
NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL Services
TOTAL CORF
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF
AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS
AMOUNT
$ 340.32
122 468~
110,900.00
191.86
17,600.00
370.60
170,711.25
$ 300,704.98
$ 363,313.88
"D-3"
\,VVI~ I I ;:)f-\1'4 l 11\ I l UI" LJ 1;:) I K J \,,I;:) ur UK/-\l'H.;,C \...UUI'~ I l
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFO~NIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. N0. ___ 1 __ ~--~-------~---
CO._,.KACTOR: McCalla Bros. DATE ____ M_ay.__2_6 __ ,_1_9_7_6 ____ _
PUMP Ai~D DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING PACI LITIES
JOB: AT THE OCEAi\1 OUfFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, .JOB NO. J-6-lB
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEUUOf) $ 11.,958.92
In accordance with contract provisions, ·the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contr~ct price are hereby appr~ved.
ADD:
Increase base plate elevation from 22.35' to 24.85'
(30") by extension of colunm and shaft. (Required
for engine stability due to lack of adequate founda-
tion for vibration purposes.)
'Pwo units each $5,641.00 plus 6% sales tax
TOTAL ADD
' No time extension this change order.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD) ~~l}.(k1}3
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 Approved:
$11,958.92.
$11,958.92
$ 345) 000. 00
$ 0.00
$ 11,958.92
$ 356,958.92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
. Orari3e County, California
By ·----------~----------~----~~---Associate Engineer
By----------------------..-:--~~~~~ Chief Engineer By __________________________________ __
Contractor
II E" AGENDA ITEM #3(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II E II
II F II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-95
APPROVING ADDENDUM TO JOB NO. J-6-lB
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E DOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WI1lI MC CALLA BROS. FOR PU~1PS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR
ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL
PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lB, PROVIDING FOR
CHANGE IN PROVISIONS FOR PAYMENT OF SALES TAX AND
PROGRESS PAYMENTS TO THE CONTRACTOR
* * * * * * * * * * *
• l
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain addendum, dated , to the
~~~~~~~~~-
purchase agreement with McCalla Bros. for Pumps and Drive Units for Additional
Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping ~tat ion, Plant No. 2, Huntington
Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lB; providing for payment of sales tax directly
to Mccalla Bros. instead of the State of California, Board of Equalization,
and revisi11g .the progress payment provisions of said purchase agreement, is
hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting as
agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of
Orange County, California, are hereby authorized and directed to execute· said
addendum in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS II F II
II G II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-96
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lC AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TIU: BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TILTING DISC CHECK
VALVES FOR 111E ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES
AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT
NO. 2, HUNTINGTON I3EACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB
NO. J-6-lC, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S,
6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, Californi~,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Valves a.nd Primer Corporation, has
completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for TILTING
DISC CHECK VALVES FOR IBE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL
PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC,
on May 31, 1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Job No. J-6-lC, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated August 28, 1975; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8Cc) -ALL DISTRICTS II G II
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO·-----------~------
CONTRACTOR: ______ F_le_m_i_n~g~Co_n_s_t_r_u_c_t_io_n __ ~----------------DATE
--------------~----------
June 2, 1976
JOB: Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8
Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (Dfl'Jj3I5fi $ 13, 600. 22
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
~ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contr~ct price are hereby appr~ved.
ADD:
1. Excavate Trench (4100 LF@ 1. 15/LF)
2. Provide 9" Sand Bedding @ 4.00/Ton
3._ Backfill and compact 380 cy@ 5.25/cy
4. ·Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 40 pipe conduit:
Ins ta 11 211 160 L F @ 1 • 00
Ins ta 11 3" 160 LF @ 1 • 50
5. Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 80 pipe conduit:
Install J.+11 180 LF@ 2.00
$ 4,715.00
911. 12
1,995.00
160.00
2i.o.oo
360.00
6. Open trench install 4" P.V.C. Backfill,
compact~" pave trenc~ 1,619.10
7. Supply and instaJl Edison cone. boxes
with lids as called for on plan
1200.00 each x 3 3,600.00
Board authorization date: June 9, 1976
By .
----------------~------~--------Consulting Engineer
By ----------------------------------Contractor
TOTAL ADD $13,600.22
Original Contract Pri.ce $ 141,441.10
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (ADD) (~~) $ 13,600.22
Amended Contract Price $ 1 5 5 , 04 1 • 3 2
Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Orange County, California
By------------------------~-----Ch i cf Engineer
II H" AG END,~ I TEn itS (n) -ALL DI s-r RI CTS II H"
II I II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-94
AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO SIGN
CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER,
TO SIGN ALL CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED BY THE
CHAIRMEN OF THE DISTRICTS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, during the course of ordinary business on behalf of each and all
of the Districts, certain documents and contracts need to be executed by, and
on behalf of, the Districts; and,
WHEREAS, during the course of these business t~ansactions, the authority
of the Boards of Directors by and through the execution of documents by the
Chairmen is not required by law or by local rules of the Districts; and,
WHEREAS, for convenience to the Districts, its employees, suppliers and
contractors, the ordinary course of business is greatly improved by having the
General Manager execute necessary documents.
NOW, TH~REFORE, the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE,
DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1. That Fred A. Harper, General Manager of the Districts, is hereby
authorized to execute any and all documents on behalf of each District or on behalf
of the Joint Administrative Organization that are required in the ordinary course
and scope of the operations of the Districts. This authority shall not empower
the General Manager to execute those contracts or documents which are expressly
required by law, contract specifications, or other local rules, to be executed by
the Chairman of the respective District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(1) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II
c
I
' '
"J-1"
June 1, 1976
Mr. Ray .E·. Lewis
Chief Engineer
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES. FOR THE
PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT :MAPS FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
Dear Mr. Lewis:
\ve appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser-
vices referenced above.
The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks
as outlined in your letter dated May 11, 1976, is as follows:
1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in
your letter. We will prepare that portion of maps 21, 22,
27, 28, 34 and 35 that are within the District 1 boundary.
We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on
any previously prepared maps with the exception of those
streets that are shown on the partially completed map 27.
Total man hours required to complete this task is 30.
2. Search of records to acquire required documents -· total
man hours:lO.
3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified -
total man hours required: 4
4. The number of man hours required for this task is included
in Task No. 1.
5. The number of man hours required to compl~te this task is
included in Task No. 3.
6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8.
Total Man llours = 52
AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1
2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (Bldg. A), Santa Ana, California 92705, 714 547-6375
"J-1"
r
c·
"J-2"
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
County.Sanitation Districts
of Ora~ge County, California -2-· June 1, 1976
The above stated times are assuming that we will be able to
secure within a two or three year period, the date that the
property was acquired.
Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is
$1, 091. · Should you have any questions concerning this proposal,
please call me.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
very truly,
AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1 "J-2"
Date: June 3, 1976
·.
Name of Project;
Location:
Entity or Person
.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Raitt Street Trunk Sewer
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT:
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
lOBH ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(714} 5~0-2910
(7)..() 962-2-411 '-'
From Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to
Myrtle Street
Undertaking Project;· Cow1ty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange
County
Staff Determination:
The District's staff,. having undertaken and completed an initial study-
of this project in accordance ~ith Section 31 o~ the Districtls guidelines
entitled· "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality,
Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaini:ng whether the proposed
project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the
following conc:lusion:
"K-1"
The project could have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a~ EIR will be required,
AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-1 11
~ '.
"K-2"
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108..C..C ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706
-(71..C) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
. ·,
This fonn shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, dated February 15, 1974.
Title and L9cation of Proj~ct: Raitt Street Trunk, Sanitation District No. 1
The proposed trunk -extends from Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to
Myrtle Street
Description of Project The trunk will connect to the Sunflower Trunk
and will be sized from ·30" to 24" and be 3 1/4 miles long. It will
cost about $1.55M and will require R/W acquisition but no relocations.
This trunk will relieve the Greenville-Sullivan Trunk and will be
growth inducing.
GUIDELINES
1. Does the p
0
roposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 25?
Yes No x
(If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form)
2. Does the project qualify as:
a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes No x.
b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes~-No x
c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes~-No x
d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 34) Yes~-No x
e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30)
Yes No x
(If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-2"
I '
If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study procedures
A. Evaluating Environmental Sign~ficance (See Section 31)
I
1.' Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as per the following: ·,
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the conununity where the project is
to be located? Yes No x
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes No x
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes ~-No x
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or-migratory fish or wildlife species?
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
Yes No x
Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes · No x
Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Yes No x .
Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
Yes No x ..
Could it . cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No x --
Could it expose people or structures to major geologic
hazards? Yes No x
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes x No
If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail.
This trunk has excess capacity and is sized to provide
for growth.
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report
may be required.
4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown
in the "Guidelines Implementing the .California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as Amended"
"K-3" AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-3"
.... I ~ •
5. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in
causing preparation of same.
The Environmental Impact Report will be prepared by staff of
the County Sanitation District No. 1 after the Board of Directors
has passed a resolution for its preparation.
Evaluation made by . L ~
Signature V
6/3/76
Date
"K-4" AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-4 11
II L"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-105-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND
FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. , has completed
the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, on May 31,
1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' C~ief Engineer has reconunended
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers
and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(M) -DISTRICT 2 II L"
"M"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-106-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING .SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND
FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, AS COMPLETE
* * * * * * * * * * *
'Tile Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., has completed
the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, on May 31,
1976; and,
Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended
acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers
and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -DISTRICT 2 "M"
Date: June 3, 1976
Name of Project:
Location:
Entity or Person
Undertaking Project:
Staff Determination:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side)
. COUNTY SANITATldN DISTRICT~
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108-4-4 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ""'708
(7J.4) 5'40-2910 ~
(71-4) 962-2-411
Beginning at Coast Highway Trunk at Back Bay Drive
and Dunes Park and continuing in Back Bay Drive to Big
Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the
pump station at Jamboree Road·
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County
1be District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study
of this project in accordance with Section 31 of the District's guidelines
entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaining whether.the proposed
project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the
following conc.lusion: ·
"N-]"
The project could not have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a negative delcaration should
be prepared.
AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-1"
p-·
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT!
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX 8127
108"'4 ELLIS AVrnUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
(71.C) 5-40-2910
(71.C) 962-2.C 11
Tilis fonn shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California, dated February 15, 1974.
Title and Location of Project Back Bay Trunk Sewer, County Sanitation District No. S
Beginning at Coast Highway Trunk at Back Bay Drive and Dunes Park and continuing in
Back Bay Drive to Big Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the
pump station at Jamboree Road
Description of Project The proposed project is the design and construction of a
24-inch cast iron gravity sewer to replace an existing, at capacity, pump station at
Jamboree Road. Development under construction and approved for construction will exceed
the capacity of the pump station. The pump station will be fitted with generators and
used for emergencies.
GUIDELINES
1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in· Section 25?
Yes xx No
(If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form)
2. Does the project qualify as:
"N-2"
a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes
b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes~-
No xx
No xx
c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes~-No xx
d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 34) Yes~-No xx
e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30)
Yes No xx
(If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be
prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.)
AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-2 11
•.
If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following:
3. Initial study procedures
A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 31)
1. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment
as .per the following: ·.
a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that
have been adopted by the community where the project is
to be located? Yes No xx
b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic
effect? Yes No xx
c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species
of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes Noxx
d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species?
Yes No xx
e. Does it breach any published national, state or local
standards relating to solid waste or litter control?
Yes No xx
f. Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or
water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining
areas? Yes No xx
g. Does it involve the_ possibility of contaminating a public
water supply system or adversely affecting ground water?
Yes No xx
h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation?
Yes No xx
i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic
hazards? Yes No xx
j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No xx
If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail.
Present service area is 85% developed or approved for development.
If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report
may be required.
4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a
Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown
in the "Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of ~
1970 as Amended"
AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-3"
5. If an rlnvironmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in
causing preparation of same.
"N-4" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5
May 25, 1976
Date
"N-4"
"0-1"
June 1, 1976
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
Chief En.gineer
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
GOVERNMENTAL
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw -
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE
PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT MAPS FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
Dear Mr. Lewis:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser-
vices referenced above.
The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks
as outlined in your letter dated May 11, 1976, is as follows:
1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in
your letter. We will prepare that portion of maps 16, 17,
22, 23, 28 and 29 that are within the District 6 boundary.
We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on
any previously prepared maps. Total man hours required
to complete this task is 34.
2. Search of records to acquire required documents -total
man hours : 2 6.
3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified -
total man hours required: 5. ·
4. The number of man hours required for this task is included
in Task No. 1.
S. The number of man _hours required to complete this task is
included in Task No. 3.
6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8.
Total Man I-lours = 73.
AGENDA ITEM #8(~) -DISTRICT 6
2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (l3ldg. A). S<rnta Ana, California 92705. 714 547-6375
"0-1"
11 0-2 11
Mr. Ray E. Lewis
County Sanitation Districts
of Or~~gc County, California -2-June 1, 197 6
The above stated times are assuming that we will be able to
secure within a two or three year period, the date that the
property was acquired.
Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is
$1,521 .. Should you have any questions concerning this proposal,
please call me.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
very truly,
AGENDA ITEN #8Cs) -DISTRICT 6 "0-2"
II P"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-110-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT
FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES RE OFFSITE SEWER
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTf\NCE
OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, IN CONNECTION
WITH OFFSITE SEWER LINE SOUTHWESTERLY OF INTER-
SECTION OF LA COLINA DRIVE AND RED HILL AVENUE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 10, 1976,
wherein an easement in the vicinity southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina
Drive and Red Hill Avenue for offsite sewer service is granted to County Sanitation
Distri~t No. 7, is hereby accepted from La Colina ,Associates, a California Limited
Partnership; and
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted
is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and
Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in th~
Official Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8Cv) -DISTRICT 7 II P"
II Q"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-111-7
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT Fr~OM LERNEH OIL
COMPANY AND AlJTllOlU Z T NG EXECUTION OF J\Cl~EE~lENT
ifElTASEMENT RELATIVE TO CONTHJ\CT NO. 7-3A-4A
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFOHNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM
LERNER OIL COMPANY, INC., AND AUlliORIZING EXECU-
TION OF AGREEMENT RE SAID EASHIENT RELATIVE TO
CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-4A
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated
~~~~~~~~~
wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation
District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Lerner Oil Company, Inc.; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said Grant of Easement is
granted is more particularly described and shown on. Exhibits "A" and "B", attached
hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is granted in connection with
operation of Sub-Trunk Sewers, Contract No. 7-3A-4A, in the vicinity of El
Camino Real and the Santa Ana Freeway, in the City of Tustin; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in
the Official Records of Orange County, California; and,
Section S. That the certain Agreement dated , by and
~~~~~~~~~-
between County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and Lerner Oil Company,
Inc., relative to said easement, is hereby approved; and,
Section 6. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General
Counsel; and,
Section 7. That payment in the amount of $1,800.00 to Lerner Oil Company, Inc.
provided in said Agreement and Grant of Easement, is hereby authorized.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #8(w) -DISTRICT 7 "Q"
<EXCERPTED FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS)
8. CF.AIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE
ORGANIZATION -A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra-
tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts
at the regular meeting in July of ~ach year. The Chairman and Vice
·Chairman shall serve at the.pleasure of the majority of the Districts.
The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the
regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare
a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications
for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the
members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other
meeting material for the July regular meeting.
II R" AGENDA ITEM #12 -ALL DISTRICTS II R"
II~ II
v
,•
RESOLUTION NO. 76-99
ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF lliE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1 , 2, 3, S , 6, 7, 8 AND 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CONFLICT
OF INTEREST CODE
* * * * * * * * * * *
Tiie Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code of the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County", a copy of which is attached
hereto and by reference incorporated herein, be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted for the Districts, subject to the approval .thereof by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Orange; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary of the Districts be, and is hereby,
authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Orange and to request said Board of Supervisors
to approve said Code in accordance with Government Code Section 87303.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #13(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II S"
,. .
"T-1"
REPLY TO
ATIN OF:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA PASADENA OFFICE
PASADENA, CAl.lroRNIA 91103
HN-l(DEB)
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
Gentlemen:
May 25, 1976
.,
Subject: CSDOC/NASA Contract for the JPL Activated Carbon Treatment
Process
Reference is made to our meeting of May 19, 1976, pertaining to an
apparent $20,000.00 discrepancy. For this reason, the following is
submitted:
In an updated letter from the State Water Resources Control Board
issued between May 3 and May 28 (attached), a two-month predesign
phase effort was approved. The JPL eff6rt was limited to $20,000,
to investigate the "best.reactor with the basis for choosing this
reactor and available reactor sizes specifically delineated." An
experimental-test program was specifically required to meet this
requirement. This approval was followed by a March 28 letter (attached)
req~esting JPL to commence efforts immediately. This letter was
followed by a Purchase Order No. 28284 authorizing JPL to proceed
in accordance with t11e March 28 letter. Reference is made in this
purchase order to our proposal and "the agreement." A subsequent
modification to this purchase order was made to make NASA the vendor,
JPL participated in the described predesign phase, and expended over
$32,000 in those two months.
On June 20, the St&te Water Resources Control Board authorized contin-
uation of the project. On June 24 a draft contract was received from
CSDOC for $280,000. Figure 1 of this contract (attached) described
expenditures by month with a cumulative total of $259,500. The mis-
understanding appears at this point. JPL assumed the $20,500 to be
available for contractual change in scope. This misunderstanding did
not come to light until later. In the meantime, JPL was following the
plan of Figure 1 month by month.
AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-1"
..
·.
"T-2"
2
In January 1976, by telecon, Ray Lewis asked JPL to take a greater
~ole in the operations. This expanded effort was begun in February
with a request for additional funding forwarded to CSDOC on March 4.
The additional ·effort requested by CSDOC amounted to $74,226. Instead
of requesting this amount, we deducted what we thought was the $20,500
for scope change. At this point, the misunderstanding came to light.
It should be pointed out that there has been no misunderstanding of
the work to be accomplished. JPL did the $20,000 effort in April/May,
followed the contractual effort as described in Figure 1, and provided
the additional effort as requested by CSDOC starting in February. Any
error, if we take CSDOC position, is only that we should have requested
$74,226 instead of $53,726.
Our position remains that we received a Purchase Order in the amount
of $20,000.00 and a Contract in the amount of $280,000.00 for a total
effort of $300,000.00. Our Task Order to JPL, which was provided to
CSDOC, indicated a total of $300,000.00. Subsequently, we have accepted
Amendment No. 1 to the contract, increasing the effort by $53,726.00 for
a new total of $353,726.00.
Since Amendment No. 1 to the Contract reads "up to a maximum total cost
of $333,726.00", our amended Task Order to JPL will have to be limited
to this amount. It is, therefore, requested that immediate action be
initiated to increase the contract total authorized by $20,000.00 to
enable JPL to complete this effort.
Sincerely,
~,_t_O"f~
Edward F. Morris, Chief
Contract Placement Branch
AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-2"
II u II
RESOLUTION NO. 76-98
AUTIIORIZING AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
WITH NASA RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS
A RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTI-IORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO TIIE
CONTRACT WITH NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS FOR
ADDITIONAL PRE-DESIGN WORK
* * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S,
6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That certain amendment dated , to the
~~~~----~-------
contract by and between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and
County Sanitation District No. 1, authorizing increase in the maximum amount
for services from $333,726.00 to $353,726.00 for additional pre-design work,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. TI1at the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation
District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of
itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976.
AGENDA ITEM #14(B) -ALL DISTRICTS II u II
·.
..
LAW OF"F"ICES
RICtiARD 0. FRAZE£
STEPHEN C.ST£WART
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
.JEFF'REY A. HARTMAN
IOSS NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE IOZO
SANTA ANA, CALIF"ORNIA 92701
AREA coot 714
835-6ZI=!
"V"
June 3, 1976
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 8
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Catifornia 92708
The Resolution presented to your board for action at this
agenda is simply to ratify and confirm the fact that Re-
organization No. 31 between the South Coast County Water
District and South Laguna Sanitary District has been
accomplished and meets all legal requirements as contained
in Heal th and Safety Code Section 4 730, ·to enable to Water
District, as the successor agency, to have a member on the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8~
South Coast County Water District, as a successor agency,
and having met the requirements of the County Sanitation
District Act with regard to membership, will be the only
Water District with rights of membership in the County
Sanitation District. This is based solely on the fact of
the merger between the two districts and the fact that the
special State Legislation was enacted to enable South Coast
County Water District to continue its rights of membership.
TLW:mp
Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "V"
RESOLUTION NO. 76-112-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 8 CONFIRMING
THE SUBSTITUTION OF SOUTH COAST COUN'IY WATER
DISTRICT AS A MEI'<IDER AGENCY OF THE DISTRICT
IN PLACE OF SOUTH LAGUNA SANITARY DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND
SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730
WHEREAS, South Laguna Sanitary District is a member agency of
County Sanitation District No. 8 and a member agency of the Joint
Administrative Organization; and,
WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District, a public agency
organized pursuant to the provisions of the County Water District
Act, has accomplished a reorganization with South Laguna Sanitary
District, a public agency organized pursuant to the Sanitary Dis-
trict Act of 1923; and,
WHEREAS, the merger of South Coast County Water District and
South Laguna Sanitary District has the effect of the dissolution of
South Laguna Sanitary District with the South Coast county Water
District assuming all rights, duties and responsibilities together
with the assumption of all assets and liabilities of the Sanitary
District; and,
WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District will now provide,
through an improvement district, all of the same services formerly
provided by South Laguna Sanitary District; and,
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 4730, of the County
Sanitation District Act, has recently been runended, in furtherance
of the accomplishment of the reorganization between South Coast
County Water District and South Lag·una Sanitary District to
expressly provide for the special condition wherein a County
Water District which is wholly or partly in the Sanitation Dis-
"W-1" AGENDA ITEN #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-1"
r ...
trict and which on or before July l, 1977, has assumed the
responsibilities, rights, duties assets, liabilities and
obligations of a Sanitary District, which at the time of such
assumption had representation on the Board of Directors of the
Sanitation District, would be included in the membership on the
Board of Directors of the Sanitation District; and,
WHEREAS, the reorganization between South Coast County Water
District and South Laguna Sanitary District has satisfied all legal
requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 to enable it to
have a member on the County Sanitation District No. 8 Board of
Directors; and,
WHEREAS, the reorganization of South Coast County Water Dis-
trict and South Laguna Sanitary District has been approved by the
voters at a special election:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD. OF DIRECTORS DOES HEREBY FIND,
DECLARE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section. 1. That South Coast County Water District, meets
all legal requirements as contained in Health and Safety Code
Section 4730 to entitle it to membership on the Board of Directors
of this district.
Section 2. This Board of Directors confirms and hereby grants
the South Coast County Water District membership on County Sani-
tation District No. 8 in accordance with the provisions of Health
and Safety Code Section 4730.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1976.
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-2"
l
t .
; i
,· ·/
"X"
May 19, 1976
County·Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Sirs:
' .
:
We, the ownership of the 107.876 acres, hereby request annexa-
tion to ·the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. A legal-
description. is attached describing the boundary of this proposed
annexation, as well as a description of certain parcels within
said boundary.
Certain parcels are designated by letter and the others by a
number. The reasoning for these parcels being designated within
the boundary of the proposed annexation is that we are requesting
to be relieved frora payment of the annexation fees on a temporary
basis-Relief from payment of fees is requested for Parcels A, B
and C, which are equestrian trails and are designated as such on
the City of Orange Trail System. Parcel F is a driving range for
the Lazy B Golf Course and Ridgeline Racquet Club. Parcels 1 and
D are the Lazy B Golf Course itself. The balance of the property;
i.e., Parcels E and 2, consisting of 570373 acres, is proposed to
be subject to the usual annexation fees.
The:r.efore, we are hereby requesting that relief from payment of
annexation fees be· given on the parcels described due to the type
of land use involved. If and when development occurs on any of
said parc~ls, it is understood that the proper fees would be due
and payable at that time.· It is our intent, however, that the
golf course and driving range become an economic unit, remain
undeveloped and never become a contributor to the sewage disposal
prob.lem.
Ownership of all of the parcels are by the same· persons and in
the same proportions: Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, and
Ridgeline Ranch, etc. is owned by Lazy B Estates, Inc., a
Corporation.
There are no residents on the property and, therefore, no voters.
Attachment
.:
~~ely,
/~-/~
Norman Brock
10604 MEADS AVENUE • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669 • {714) 633-4710 • (714) 633-9500
AGENDA ITEM #33(A) -DISTRICT 7 ~ "X"
'•,
'-""
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8(f)
May 26, 1976
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
of Orange County! California
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT5
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127
106.U ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706
1714) 540-2910
(714) 962-2411
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1976
Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1976,
pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972.
·The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first
nine months of the 1975-76 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined
1975-76 budgets for all Districts is $98.9 million, of which approximately 82% is for capital expenditures for
facilities improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the
several Districts are as follows:
Budgeted Revenue
Tax Revenue
Federal & State Construction Grants
Connection Fees
Other Revenues
Carry-over from Accumulated
Construction Reserves
Average
Percent of
Total Budget
1974-75 1975-76
19% 19%
22 15
2 2
6 11
-2.!_ -2.L
100% 100%
Average
Percent of
Budgeted Expenditures Total Bud9et
1914-75 1975-76
District Facilities Expansion
and Reserves 44% 45%
Joint Works Expansion and
Reserves 41 37
Debt Service 4 4
Share of Joint Operations 5 5
District Operations, Maintenance,
and Other 6 _9_
100% 100%
Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an
itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects, and respective share of the joint works expansion.
Separate staff reports relative to the current status on individual construction projects are included each
month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting.
Except for inventory control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. The inventory system is being phased
in conjunction with the move to our new warehouse and establishment of revised warehousing and purchasing
procedures which we expect to complete in the near future. The staff is· undertaking a review of the on-I ine
·computer system to assure maximum utilization of its capabilities, consistent with cost effectiveness.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual
basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '75-76 which were accrued in 1974-75 are not
reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased
to discuss them with you at your convenience.
Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained well within their respective 1975-76
total budget allocations. However, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were
approved, budget transfers in certain categories will be necessary. The budget transfers which are more fully
described in this report, and sununarized on the last page, are recommended.
-.
CASH INVESTMENTS
Earned interest of approximately $2.4 million from our continuing program of investing reserve fu1,Ps (primarily'-'
capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accru~~ during thc~first nine
months of fiscal 1975-76. As of March 31st, approximately 96~~ of the Districts' cash funds were i·<'•ested in
short-term government securities or time deposits as shown below. The balance of cash on hand was earr,ing
interest in corm1ingled investments with the County Treasurer's office.
Amount Percent
Cash on Hand $ 1,881 ,470 4. 1
Investments in Gov't Securities 44,545,738 ~
Total (Al 1 Districts) $46,427,208. 100.0%
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the DistriGts 1 jointly-
owned treatment and disposal facilities.
Salaries and Wages -As previously reported, funds were not included in the budget for salary increases
granted by the Boards pursuant to agreements with employee groups. However, because of payroll savings
resulting from unfilled positions, the increases will be funded from current year payroll savings and
expenses will be maintained well within the budget allocation.
Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms,
all of which will be within the budget allocation.
Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products
have been experienced. The Districts' have a cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel
fuel with the County of Orange. Barring further increases, the budget allocation should suffice.
Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to place this coverage beGause of the reluctance of carriers to
insure governmental agencies. Premiums have doubled in the past two years and we expect them to continue
to rise. Budget allocation \olill be tight but should be adequate.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Our chlorine
contract expired in December and although last year's chlorine unit costs increased 55%, the new unit
price bid was down and expenditures this·year should therefor be less than anticipated.
Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has
precluded the necessity of using chemicals at the rate originally anticipated and yet enable the Districts
to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Additionally, we have been able to obtain improved
quality chemicals at lower cost which has reduced the cost. Needless to say, there will be funds to
carryover and apply to next year's budget requirements.
Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge hauling and EDP services. Because of esca-
lating costs and increasing volumes, the Boards were previously advised that a budget transfer for this
account might be necessary. However, at this time it appears as if the allocation will be sufficient.
Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel's fees and audit fees paid through March 31st.
Funds for work on revenue program will be carried over to next year.
Printing and Publications -Reproduction policies have been changed to m1n1m1ze costs. However, con-
tinuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with increased volume and
11 paper work" required by other agencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. As previously
reported, a budget transfer for this account in the amount of $1,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account
is desired in the event it is necessary.
Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and
replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations.
Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue
to have a significant impact on this item, however, absent major equipment failures, the current year
allocation will not be exceeded.
Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research ~
Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first nine months of
1975-76. Because our auditors have now determined that certain cost associated with the evaluation of
the JPL-ACTS project originally thought payable from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund should be paid
from Joint Operating Funds, a budget transfer of $2,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is recom-
mended.
-2-
Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has
increased substantially due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is
from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. Prices have stabilized
during the past year after a rapid escalation when oil prices increased substantially, and thus consider-
able carryover funds will be available for next year.
Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere. Major item in this account is freight-in. During
the year it was n~cessary to obtain a large shipment of chemicals from the Mid-west urgently needed for
our solids handling operation. This material is generally available on the West Coast. Because of this,
our freight expenditures for the current year will be higher than normal and a transfer of $4,000 from
the Chemical Coagulants Account is, therefor, recommended.
Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account
balance from the previous year.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expa~ding and improving the Districts' presently-owned treatment and disposal
facilities and represents an average of 41% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1975-76. During
the first nine months, $12.5 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion,
primarily on the $32.5 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment FacilitJes at Treatment Plant No. 1, approxi-
mately 84% of which will be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial
statements of the respective Districts.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each
·respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes -Approximately 61% of the budgeted property taxes for 1975-76 have been received through March 31st.
Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant funds received during the period amount to $9.9
million, all on the 46 MGD Activated Sludge project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2%
of ''approve~' treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that payments will be limited to Boz
of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The staff has previously advised the
Directors that our revenue program, even though it has been used as a 11 model 11 by the State, is unacceptable
because it includes ad valorem taxes for operation, maintenance 'and capital recovery charges. The Boards
are aware that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, are vigorously
supporting HR 9560 which would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem taxes,
and result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts' taxpayers. Passage of the amendment
appears somewhat in doubt at this time and it will therefor be necessary for the Boards to consider adoption
of a program implementing 11 user charges''. to assure receipt of the full grant allocation. Prohibition of
ad valorem taxes will also have a substantial affect on long-range funding programs of the Districts.
Connection Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became
effective in Districts 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. District 5 revenues have dropped off considerably (only
23% of last year's budget was received) and collections this year are running behind budget. District 7
fees have also decreased substantially over the past two years. District 2 and District 3 are about as
projected; however, some cities are not remitting fees to the District on schedule and therefor receipts
compared to budget may be misleading. Further, the budgets for these two Districts are approximately 54%
and 25% respectively, of the original annual forecast made by the financial consultant.
Other Revenue -Except as footnooted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of
capacity rights.
District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk
sewers. The average 1975-76 budget for this item is 45% for the seven Districts. However, this average
is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the
lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts
during the three quarters was $12,998,733. District 7 1 s Facilities Revolving Fund budget reflected pro-
jected receipts of approximately $1. 1 million from the Cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin and the Costa
Mesa Sanitary District pursuant to proposed amendments to the agreements with those agencies for the
collection of connection fees. Because terms of the amendments have not yet been worked out, these funds
have not been received, and it is therefor necessary to request that the authorized transfer of funds
from the District 7 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACO) to the Facilities Revolving Fund be increased
from $483,000 to $983,000 to be allocated from the ACO Fund's Facilities Improvements and Reserve Account.
Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities
expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation
bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 mil lion.
Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treat-
ment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each
District's respective gallonage flow (sec Joint Operating Fund statement for details).
-3-
. --.-
Dl~trict Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of Individual Districts' general op~r~ting
expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. District
7 should transfer $200 to their Memberships account to cover increased proportional share of AMSA and CASA"-"'
dues. Last November the Boards adopted a policy with regard to uncol lectable accounts. Pursuant -to this
new policy, it is necessary to make the transfers indicated to provide for bad debts authorized for~write-off.
JOINT OPERATING FUND
From the Account
Chemical Coagulants
To the Account
Printing &
Publications
Research &
Monitoring
Other Expenses
Amount
$1,000
2,000
4,000
$7,000
Dist. No. Fund
Oper
3 Oper
3 ACO
7 Oper
7 ACO
11 ACO
DISTRICT FUNDS
From the Account
Unappropriated
Reserve
Un.appropriated
Reserve
Facilties Ext.
Reserve
Unappropriated
Reserve
Facilities Ext.
Reserve
Facilities Ext.
Reserve
J. Wayne Sylvester
Director of Finance
-it-
To the Account
Uncollectable
Accounts
Uncollectable
Accounts
Un co 11 ec tab 1 e
Accounts
Memberships
Transfer to
Facil. Rev.
Uncollectable
Accounts
Uncollectable
Accounts
Amount
$ 500
$ 50
$ 50
$ 200
$500, 100
$500,000
100
$500. 100
$ 100
-.-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW
9 Months Ended 3-31-76
REMJ\INING BUDGE'l.1
1975-76 YEAR TO DA'ffi J~UDGET
S!1LARTE8, 1-ll!GES & BENZ~PITS
Salaries & Wageo
Employee Benefits
.Sub-totol Payroll
Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF
Net Joint Operating Payroll
MA'J.1ERIAL8,, 8l!PPLIE8 & SERVICE'S
Gasoline, Oil & Fuel
Insurance
Office Expense
Operating Expense
Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals
Chemical Coagulants
Other Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
Professional Services
Printing & Publications
Rents & Leases--Equipment
Repairs & Maintenance
Research & Monitoring
Travel, Meeting & Training
Uti.li ties
Other Expenses
Prior Years Expenses
Total Material & Supplies
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
Ler.s: Revenues
NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
G.4LLON.4GE CliARGE'S
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
FLOW IN
MILLION GALS
5,381 MG
J..S,232
15,970
2' ~/17
i;n4
3,039
3,389
48,442 MG --------
3,205,665 2,063,770 1,141,895
609,161 346,165 262,996
3,814,826 2, 409., 935 1,404,891
12100 z 000 764z313 335,687
2, 714 ,826 1,645,622 1,069,204
60,000 32,544 27,456
45,000 39,822 5,178
25,000 i4,806 10,194
187,000 91,il24 95,876
320,000 53,139 266,861
127,000 52,401 74,599
88,000 56,402 31,598
74,000 25,164 48,836
30,000 22,514 7,486
26,000 12,949 13,051
325,000 220,995 104,005
154,500 110' 834 43,666
17,000 9,517 7,483
870,000 389,495 4?0,505
19,000 14,852 4,148
20,000 14,464 5)536
2,387,500 1,161,022 1,226,478
5' 102' 3L.'6 2,806,644 2,295,682
250,000 228,496 21,504
4,852,326 2,578,148 2,274,178
GALLONAGE
CHARGE
286,384
810,667
849,945
144,602
144,443
161,740
180,367
2,578,148
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
"""" Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
4,608,259
1,215,590 749,192
1,412,000 941,702
37,000 27 ., 377
335,457 238,279
6,564,809
1,985,000 -0-
4,434,738 1,186,074
93,888(1) 87,456
590,566 285,691
63,350(1) 21,557 ------
1,580,778
4,984,031
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS:
Dyer Road Trunk Improv~ments
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facillties
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
4
1,766,368
21,657
4,241,700
11,593
13,709
5,660,552
11 ' 715 ·, 5 8 3
1975-7-6
Additions
1,186,074
1,186,074
(i) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
466,398
.4 7 0' 298
9,623
97,178
1,985,000
3,248,664
6,432
304,875
41,793
Balance
3-31-76
4
2,952,442
21,657
4,241,700
11,593
13,7 "9
5,660,~2
12,901,657
• i... .. • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
5,264,912
4,442,000
829,000
7,415,808
19,268,424
10,657,644
553,982(1)
1,523~173
217,700(1)
FACILITIES· EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects
Yorba Linda Pump Station
Carbon Canyon Interceptors
Kraemer Interceptor
Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Intercepotr
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative ·
Facilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
. Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
251,431
324,094
1,600,596
155,135
1,410,689
48,768
3,790,713
5,554,102
315,333
24,729,699
1,186
33,172
33,582
17,798,828
52,256,615
13,915,782
3,198,730
2,961,053
662,984
3,415,234
24,153,783
4,020,067
3,729,445
510,566
808,633
129,652
9,198,363
14,955,420
197 5-7-6
Additions
2,799,448
444,493
3,971
474,096
35,379
262,680
4,020,067
3,729,445
2,066,182
1,480,947
166,016
4,000,574
15,248,357
6,928,199
43,416
714,540
88,048
Balance
3-31-76
3,050,879
768,587
1,604,567
629' 2Jl
1,446,068
311,448
7,810,780
9,283,547
315,333
24,729,699
1,186
33,172
33,582
17,798,828
. 7,749,512 60,006,127
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
...
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
. .
Remainin~ 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
7,1137,449
5,183,000
629,000
1,073,000
18,258,550
8,841,250
776,546(1)
1,664,462
424,300(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Knott Interceptor Projects
Imperial Relief Interceptor
Westside Relief rnterceptor Projects
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
7,091,769
844,530
131,870
3,685
8,071,854
6,121,797
266·, 131
23,833,572
15,036
28,419
52,006
19,618,078
58,006,893
15,857,645
4,565,819
3,263,708
993,638
699,468
25,380,278
8,213,720
4,110,638
710,928
847,810
169,637
14,052,733
11,327,545
1975-7-6
Additions
6,664,576
376
1,488,273
60,495
8,213,720
4,110,638
·12,324,358
(1) Exclusive of authorized gene1·al and contingency reserves
2,871,630
1,919,292
(36l~,638)
373,532
10,044,830
4,730,612
65,618
816,652
254,663
Balance
3-31-76
13,756,345
844,906
1, 620' 1_4 3
64,180
16,285,574
10,232,435
266,131
23,833,5·72
15,036
28,419
52,on6
19' 618' ~1
70,331,251
A I . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1,012,092
985,000
65,000
219,497
1,228,798
2,409,119
28,965(1)
297,824
250,920(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications
NIWA Planning .
Coast Highway Force Main Litigation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
27,981
2,000
1,512
760
32,253
1,232,177
6,231
3,096,885
7,347
7,115
8,946
3,948,667
8,339,621
2,017,349
641,243
656,909
67,450
124,058
3,507,009
11,807
827,377
26,563
144,244
129,476
1,139,467
2,367,542
197 5-7-6
Additions
2,138
410
9,259
11,807
827,377
839,184
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
370,849
328,091
(2,450)
95,439
1,216,991
1,581,742
2,402
153,580
121,444
Balance
3-31-76
30,119
2,000
1,922
10,019
44,060
2,059,554
6,231
3,096~885
7,347
7,115
8,946
3,948,667
·9,178,805
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
"-" Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses·
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances> March 31st
632,004
873,000
5,000
133,152
571,000
2,695,137
35,546(1)
302,907
61,340(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Pump Station Modifications
Coast Highway Force Main Litigation
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PI.;JLJVT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
7,405
90
274
7,769
1,092,580
562
618,344
2,653
7,394
16,237
3,501,311
5,246,850
2,213,295
386,933
582,486
5,698
116,102
3,304,514
4,631
733,641
32,673
144,082
21,431
936,458
2,368,056
197 5-7-6
Additions
1,264
24
3,343
4,631
733,641
245,071
290,514
(698)
17,050
566,369
1,961,496
2,873
158,825
39,909
Balance
3-31-76
8,669
114
3,617
12' 40,0
1,826,221
562
618,3~4
2,653
7,394
16,?~7
3,501,~l
738,272 . ·5,985,122
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
.. , ' -. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
Taxes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES: .
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
2,005,595
1,225,000
156,ooo
1,335,495
3,356,81n
4,921,573
694,061(1)
340,516
245,275(1)
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Tustin-Orange Trunk Prqjects
Other Projects
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
Peneral Plant and Administrative
Facilities
~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
569,167
2,395
571,"562
1,531,845
230,165
16,003,785
10,782
12,Ll40
4,908,993
23,269,572
5,106,557
1,208,184
816,671
168,656
271,732
7,571,800
729,020
1,028,597
476,084
161,319
111,372
2,506,392
5,065,408
197 5-7-6
Additions
729,020
729,020
1,028,597
797,411
408,329
(12,656)
1,063,763
2,627,821
3,892,976
217,977
179,197
133,903
Balance
3-31-76
1,298,187
2,395
1,300,5-82
2,560,442
230,165
16,003,785
10,782
12,41rn
4,908,993
1,757,617 25,027,189
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
March 31, 1976
BUDGET REVIEW
;. .
·~ Remaining 1975-76
Budget Year to Date Budget
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st
REVENUES:
'11axes
Federal and State Construction Grants
Fees
Other Revenues
Total Revenue & Beginning Balances
EXPENDITURES:
District Construction & Reserves
Joint Works Construction & Reserves
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense
Share of Joint Operating Expenses
District Operating & Other Expenditures
Total Expenditures
Ending Fund Balances, March 31st
1,217,106
1,051,000
5,000
L118, 523
2,741,000
3,140,553
94,700(1)
362,878
212,520(1)
FACILITIES· EXPANSION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Slater Ave. Pump Statiop Wet Well
Slater Ave. Pump Station Modifications
Master Plan Report
Share of Joint Works Expansion
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PJ,ANT & EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Stations
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities
.General Plant and Administrative
Facilities
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities
Total Property Plant & Equipment
Balance
6-30-75
52,030
7,698
1,302
61,030
1,314,073
18,711
3,797,881
3,053
19,936
4,211,117
9,425,801
4,328,622
741,794
700,571
16,573
216,046
6,003,606
19,488
882,369
85,938
179,941
72,381
1,240,117
4,763,489
197 5-7-6
Additions
19,467
21
19,488
882,369
901,857
(1) Exclusive of authorized general and contJngency reserves
475,312
350,429
(11,573)
202, irn
2,721,512
2,258,1B4
8,762
182,937
140,139
Balance
3-31-76
52,030
27,165
1,323
80,518
2,196,442
18,711
3,797,881
3,053
19' g-:~6
4,211,'-/
10,327,658
II
BOARDS OF DlnECTons
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
JUNE 9J 1976 -7:30 P.M.
Post Office Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-2411
AGENDA
THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR
WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY
OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll Call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any.
See supplemental agenda
(5) EACH DISTRICT
(6)
Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings,
as mailed:
District 1 May 12, 1976 regular
District 2 May 12, 1976 regular
District 3 May 12, 1976 regular
District 5 May 12, 1976 regular
District 6 May 12, 1976 regular
District 7 May 12, 1976 regular
District 8 April 14, 1976 :regular
District 11 May 12, 1976 regular, and
June 7, 1976 adjourned
ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman:
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of
the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall
be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District)
JOINT OPERATING FUND llD" See page(s) 11 A" and
--~--------~~-
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND "D" See page (s) "A" and
--~--------~~-
DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) II B"
DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) II B"
DISTRICT NO. 5 .See page(s) llB"
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) II B"
DISTRICT NO: 6 NONE
DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) 11c11
DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C"
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS I 8(A) THROUGH 8( w)
All matters plated upon the consent calendar are considered
as not requiring discussion or further explanation and
unless any particular item is requested to be removed from
the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member
of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar
will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the
consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar
shall b~ considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from
the consent calend;fr.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing
on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2)
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Chang~ Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Pump and Drive Units for the
Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping
Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, authorizing an addition
of $11,958.92 to the contract with McCalla Bros. to increase
base plate elevation. See page "E"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-95, approving Addendum No. 1
to the purchase contract with McCalla Bros. for Pump and Drive
Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall
Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, in form approved
by the General Counsel, to provide for payment of sales tax
directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California,
and amending progress,payment provisions (does not affect total
contract price) See page "F"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-96, accepting Tilting Disc
Check Valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean
Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California,
Job No. J-6-lC, as complete; and authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion. See page "G"
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in
the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, authorizing an
addition of $13,600.22 to the contract with Fleming Construction
for trenching and underground vaults in connection with .City of
Huntington Beach improvements incorporated into said contract,
Districts to be reimbursed by City for said cost. See page "H"
(e) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-93, determining
prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts'
construction contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding
Resolution No. 75-85
(f) Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report
of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31,
1976; and approving reconunended budget transfers (mailed with
agenda material)
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings,
conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within
the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value
to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses
incurred
(h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to
attend and participate in the AMSA Technical Conference on Finance
and Management of Wastewater Agencies to be held in Seattle,
Washington on July 21-23,. 1976; and authorizing reimbursement
for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4)
-3-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3)
ALL DISTRICTS (continued)
(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-94, authorizing Fred A. Harper,
General Manager, to sign all contracts and documents not required
to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. See
page "I" ~
(j) Consideration of motion granting temporary authority for payment
of overtime to Districts' Principal Accountant up to September 30,
1976, due to extended illness of other accounting staff personnel
DISTRICT 1
(k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for
right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk
sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,091.00. See page "J"
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(1) Considerations of actions relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer
pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the·
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "K"
(2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare draft
Environmental Impact Report relative to Raitt Street
Trunk Sewer
DISTRICT 2
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-105-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract
No. 2-14-3A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion. See page "L"
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-106-2, accepting Santa Ana
River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract
No. 2-14-4A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice
of Completion. See page "M"
DISTRICT 3
(o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of
Solomon Shapiro, dated May 20, 1976, in the amount of $50,000.00
in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor,
Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2,
and refer to the contractor and District's liability insurance
carrier for appropriate action
(p) Consideration of motion to deny leave to file late claim by
Karen L. Morton for lack of sufficient showing of excusable
neglect relative to a claim in connection with construction of
the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2,
as recommended by the General Counsel
(CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5)
-4-
(8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4)
DISTRICT 5
(q) Consideration of actions relative to Back Bay Trunk Sewer
(East Side) pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing
the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental
Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "N"
(2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare
negative declaration declaring that the Bay Bay Trunk
Sewer (East Side) will not have a significant effect on
the environment and directing the filing of notice thereof
(r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids
for purchase of 24-inch Ductile Pipe for the Back Bay Trunk
Sewer (East Side), Contract No. 5-20A
DISTRICT 6
(s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal
of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for
right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk
sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,521.00. See page "0"
DISTRICT 7
(t) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-108-7, authorizing
initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1.3834 acres
of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Street
and Handy Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 52 -St. Amand Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(u) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-109-7, ordering
annexation of approximately 11.165 acres to the District in
the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extended to a point
westerly of Santiago Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 49 -Tract
No. 8306 to County Sanitation District No. 7)
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-110-7, authorizing acceptance
of Grant of Easement from La Colina Associates, a California
Limited Partnership, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer
service in connection with a sewer line southwesterly of the
intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue, at no cost
to the District. See page "P"
(w) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-111-7, approving and authorizing
execution of agreerrent with Lerner Oil Company, Inc. for right of
way in connection with Contract No. 7-3A-4A, Sub-Trunks; authorizing
payment in the amount of $1,800.00; and accepting Grant of Easement
in connection with said right of way. See page "Q"
END OE CONSENT CALENDAR
-5-
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Report cf the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to
receive and file the Committee's written report
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive
Committee:
(a) Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget:
(1) Consideration of motion approving 1976-77 personnel
requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 76-97 amending
Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-17 (Copy of
resolution in Directors,. meeting folders)
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77
Joint Operating Budget
(3) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction)
(4) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance
to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor
for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30,
1976, and declaring.that such certification shall comply with
the provisions of Resolution No. ~6-10 pertaining to procedures
for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1976-77
budgets are adopted by the respective Districts
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive
bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for Security
Monitoring System, Specification No. PW-054, for an amount
not to exceed $13,000 for installation and maintenance for the first
year, plus cost of annual maintenance thereafter
(c) Consideration of motion approving concept of value engineering
procedures relative to the design of 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with Federal and
State guidelines, to provide cost-effective design of said facility
(d) Discussion re amending connection charge ordinances in Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 to permit waiver of all or portion of connection
fees under special circumstances.
(e) Consideration of motion approving nominations of Frances Wood, Chairman,
District No. 3, (member) and Fred A. Harper, General Manager, (alternate)
as the Districts' representatives on the Southern California Association
of Governments 208 Program Committee
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "R"
-6-
(13) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8 & 11
Hearing on proposed Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County:
(a) Open hearing
(b) Report of General Counsel
(c) Actions to date:
(1) Resolution No. 76-90, setting time and place of hearing adopted
on May 12, 1976 by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
(2) Notice (resolution) published May 21, 1976 (Districts 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11) Santa Ana Register
(3) Notice published May 28, 1976 (District 8) Daily Pilot
(4) Notice of hearing, resolutuion and copy of Code mailed to
affected parties on May 28, 1976 or June 1, 1976
(d) Written comments, if any
(e) Oral comments, if any
(f) Close hearing
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-99 adopting Conflict of Interest
Code. See page "S"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, dated May 25, 1976, in
connection with JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility. See page "T"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-98, authorizing amendment to the
contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re
JpL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services from
$333,726 to $353,726 for additional pre-design work. See page "U"
(15) DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 & 11
Consideration of the following resolutions amending Section 1, Subsection (b),
of the annexation policy resolutions of the respective Districts providing
for the change indicated below:
(a) DISTRICT 2
(b) DISTRICT 3
(c) DISTRICT 5
(d) DISTRICT 7
(e) DISTRICT 11
Delete sentence:
Add sentence:
Resolution No.
76-100-2
76-101-3
76-102-5
76-103-7
76-104-11
Amending Resolution No.
75-42-2
75-43-3
75-15-5
75-44-7, as amended
75-49-11
"The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the
annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per
acre hereinaboye established."
"The date of payment of annexation acreage fee to the
District shall govern the amount of the f ce per acre
hereinabove established."
-7-
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business a nd communications or supplemental agend a items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Other business a nd communications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if a ny
(18) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to ad journ
(19) DISTRICT 2 .
Consideration of Stand a rd Resolution No. 76-1 07 -2, authorizing acceptance
of Grnat of Easement from Calprop Corporation for a permanent easemen t
in connection with the r ea lignment of Yorba Linda Force Ma in (from
Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard), Contract No . 2-16-2, and authori z i ng
paym ent in the amount of $7,000 .00 for said easement .
(20) DISTR.ICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of mot ion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT 3
Oth e r business and communications or supplemental agenda items, i f any
(23) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(24) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agen da items , i f any
(25) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion t o ad journ
(2 6 ) DISTRIC T 6
Other busines s and communications or supplemental agenda items , if any
(27) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to a djourn
(28 ) DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel 's memorandum
dated June 3 , 1976; and approving Resolution No. 76 -11 2-8 , confirmi ng
the subst itution of South Co as t County Water District as a member agency
of the District s in place of South Laguna Sanit ary District pursuant to
the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 473 0 . See pages "V"
and "W"
(29) DISTR ICT 8
Other business and communic at ions or suppleme nt a l agend a items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 8
Con sideration of motion to adjourn
(31) DISTRICT 11
Other business a nd co~uunic a tion s or suppl eme nt a l agenda items, if any
-8-
.. . ..
(32) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(33) DISTRICT 7
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Lazy B
Estates, Inc. for annexation of approximate ly 107.876 acres
of territory to the District in the Orange Park Acres area between
Randall Street and Amapola Avenue and refer to staff. See page 11 X"
(b) Discussion of Lazy B Estates, Inc. request for waiver of fees for
portion of proposed annexation
(34) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(35) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-9-
ME ET I NG DATE --=-J u=n"°"e~9_,_, -'1=9;...:.7...,.6__ T IM E
DISTRICT 1
7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3 ,5,6,7,8 and li
-
(EVANS) ........• GARTHE ..•.•• _; ___ _
(EDGAR) ........ : SHARP ...... _/ ____ _
(DIEDRICH) .•.... BATTIN · ..... _J ____ _
RIMA ........ _J _ ----
DISTRICT 2
(GROOT) ......... WEDAA •. ·n·: •.
(HOLLI NDEN). .... SCOTT ... t~.
(DIED R ICH) ...... CLARK ..... ..
(GARTHE) ••...... EVANS ..... ..
(WEDDLE) ........ FOX ......... .
(DE JfSUS) ...... HOLT ........ .
(THOM) .......... KAYWOOD .... .
PERRY ...... .
(HOYT) .......... SM ITH ...... .
!TIPTON) ........ WINN ....... .
WARD) ......... , WOOD ...... ..
GRAHAM) •.•••... YOUNG ...•.•.
DISTRICT 3·
0....
~----
-./_ ----
-..;-----
./ ------a_,
./ ------J _./ ____ _
-J ------J ____ _
_/ _____ _
------
(WARD) .•... .' .... WOOD ........ _• ____ _
(HOLLI NDEN) · · · · SVALSTAD· .. • _J ____ _
(GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· ~ ___ . _
(WEDDLE) .... ·· .. COOPER ...... _./ ___ --
(SYLVIA) ........ cox .......... _J ____ _
CULVER······ __ ;_ ----
(GARTHE) ........ EVANS · ...... _;__ _ __ _
(PRIEST) .... ···· FRE SE ·· .. · .. _.;_· ___ _
(THOM)····· .. ··· KAYWOOD ... ··_.; ____ _
(LACAYO) ........ MAC LAIN·· .. _J ____ _
(DAVI s) .. · .. · · · · MEYER .. ··· .. ~ ___ _
OLSON .. ·.... J
(WIEDER)-.. · .. ·• PATTINSON .. · ./ == ==
(DIEDRICH) ...... SC HMIT······ _J ____ _
(YOUN G)······ .. · STEVENS··· .. -"-__ . __
(MILLER) .. ·· .... WEI SHA UPT· .. _.; ____ _
DISTRICT 5
MC INNIS .... _.; ____ _
(DIEDRICH) ...... RILEY ....... _; ____ _
(WILLIAMS) ...... ROGERS ...... _.; ____ _
·DISTRICT 6
RIMA .. . . .. .. "'
(ROGERS) ........ RYCKOFF ..... -./-----
(DIEDRICH) ...... BATTIN ...... I ====
DISTRICT 7
lEDGAR) ......... SALTARELLI . J .
RO GERS) .... · .. · BARRETT .. 11;-· .; == ==
SILLS) ......... BURTON .. l.:M.. I
DIEDRICH) ... ··· CLARK .. ··•·· -.;-----
EVAN S )· .. · .. • .. GARTHE...... v == ==
GLOCKNER···. w
(HOYT) ...... · .. · SMITH···· .. · ___:/.__ == ==
DISTRICT 11
foIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _1 ____ _
SHENKMAN ..•. _J ____ _
WIEDER ...... _J ___ . __ _
DISTRICT 8
ED\'JARDS ..... _.! ____ ._
(JOHN SON)) ...... SWEE NEY ..... _fi.-____ _
(DIED RICH ...... RILEY ........ _L ___ _
6/8176
JOINT BOARDS Sb 4f-'
ROGERS~········ BARRETT· .. ·.. ~ r;_
DI EDB ICH) .. · .. ·BATT JN....... ./ .,.
GRAY) ........... BLACKMAN .... _!t:::_ _r;._
SILLS) ....... : .. BURTON . .. .. . J J
DIEDRICH). ..... CLARK ....... -,---~-
WEDDLE).. ....... COOPER ....... .; _.L_
SYLVIA) ......... COX .......... _1 ___ J _
CULVER ....... _I ___ ;_
!GARTHEL ....... EVANS........ .; "
WEDDLE) ......... FOX .......... _I ___ .;_
PRIESTL ....... FRESE........ ./ I
EVANS) .......... GARTHE....... ./ "
GLOCKNER.... flJ c~ ·
!DE Jf:SUSL ..... HOLT ......... P../ ,,..
THOM) ........... KAYWOOD. ..... -"-__ v _
LACAYO) ......... MAC LA IN.... v "
ROGERS).. ....... MC INNIS.... I "'
(DAVI s) .......... MEYER........ ft , <r
OLSON........ .; ./
(WI EDER) ........ PATTINSON... I .;
PERRY........ J I
(DIEDRICH) ...... RILEY ........ v "
RIMA......... J J
(WILLIA~S) ...... ROGERS....... .; .;
(ROGERS} ........ RYCKOFF...... I 1
(EDGAR) .......... SALTARELLI .. -,---.; -
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT....... I I
(HOLLI ND EN) ..... SCOTT. . . . . . . . ' .;
(EDGAR).. ........ SHARP ........ -"'-__ ,, _
SHENKMAN.... .; .;
(HOYTL ......... SMITH........ J _L_
(YOUNG) .......... STEVENS ..... _.t ___ ;_
(HOLLINDEN) .•... SVALSTAD •... _, ___ .;_
(GROOT) .......... WEDAA ........ _it_~
(MILLER} ........ WEISHAUPT ... _1 ___ ;_
WIEDER...... J .;
!TI PTONL ....... WINN ......... -.;---.;-
WARD) ........... WOOD......... " .;
GRAHAM} ........ YOUNG ........ _I ___ .;_
OTHERS
(!)-i_c,J
Nov"' \1vo<IL
(JYrY l <;>v " ....
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARK E
TAYLOR
BROWN 1l
WOODRUFF ~ -E-wnm-
HOHENER --:;;-
HOWARD
HUNT J
KEITH ~
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDO X
MARTINSON ---:;r-
p I ER SALL
STEVENS ~
TRAVERS
MEETING DATE June 9, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11
DISTRICT 1
(EVANS). •••••••• GARTHE.. •• • • V ___ _
(EDGAR) ..•••••• ~ SHARP ••.••• ~ __ ---
(DIEDRICHi ••••• B/\TTIN······ ~ ----
RIMA········~----
DISTRICT 2
(GROOT). .•.•••.• WEDAA • • • • • • • a_, ~HOLLI NDENL .•• SCOTT ••••••• ~ == ==
DIEDRICH) .••.•• CLARK .•••••• v
GARTHE) •••••.•• EVANS ••.•••• ~ ----
~WEDDLE) ...•.••• FOX ..••..•••• ~ == ==
DE Jf:SUS).. •••• HOLT .•.•••••• __lL_ ___ _
THOM) •••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• -l.L-___ _
PERRY ••••••• _1L.
(HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH ••••.. · ~ ----
~TIPTON) ........ WINN........ 1/ == ==
WARD) ........... WOOD • • • . • • • • __1L. ___ _
GRAHAM) ••.••••• YOUNG....... 17 ____ .
DISTRICT 3·
(WARD) ••..•• -•••• WOOD........ v ___ _
(HOLLI NDEN) • · • · SVALSTAD .... ~ __ --
(GRAY)····· .. ••• BLACKMAN···· CV ---· -
(WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ V-----
(SYLVIA).······· COX·········· V ___ _
CULVER······ . V------
(GARTHE) ... · · · • • EVANS······· V" __ --
(PRIEST).······· FRESE······· V° ----
(THOM)······· .. • KAYWOOD····· v' ----
(LACAYO)········ MAC LAIN···· .._..------
(DAVIS)········· MEYER······· ~ __ --
OLSON • • · • · • • ~ __ --
(WI EDER).······· PATTINSON··· ~ ___ _
(DIEDRICH) •. ··•· SCHMIT······ .,.--___ _
(YOUNG) •.••.••.• STEVENS·····~ ___ _
(MILLER) •.....•• WEISHAUPT··· --JL ___ _
DISTRICT 5
MC INNIS •••. ~ __ -·-
(DIEDRICHL •••• RILEY ....•.• ~ ___ _
(WILLIAMS) •••..• ROGERS...... .,,,..,-___ _
· DISTRICT 6
RIMA •••••••• ~
(ROGERS) ..•••.•. RYCKOFF •.••• ~ == ==
(DIEDRICH>.. •.•• BATTIN...... r/" ___ _
DISTRICT 7
!EDGAR) •.••••.•• SALTARELLI. V ___ ._
ROGERS) •• • .... • BARRETT····· ~ ___ _
SILLS) •.••••.•• BURTON...... ~ ___ _
DIEDRJCH). ·····CLARK .. ••·•• ~ ___ _
EVANS)········· GARTHE • • · • · • ___£_ ___ _
GLOCKNER····-0-____ _
(HOYT)·········· SMITH······· ~ ___ _
DISTRICT 11
(DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... ~ ___ _
SHENKMAN .••• ~ ___ _
WIEDER •.•••. ~-·-__
DISTRICT 8
EDWARDS ...•. ~ ____ ._
(JOHNSON)) .•.... SWEENEY ...•• ~ ----
(DIEDRICH ..••.• RILEY .••••••• ~ ----
6/8176
JOINT BOARDS . ..!J__ ''(~~~~L
ROGERS}········ BARRETT-"····· _..&c:::::... V
DIEDBICH)······BATTIN······· ~-'&:;
GRAY) ••••••••••• BLACKMAN •••• ~ __
SILLS) .. ·~ .•• : •. BURTON ..•••• _,L_ ~
DI EDR ICHJ •.•••• CLARK ••.•••• ~ L_
WEDDLE) .•••••••• COOPER •.••••• V" ..JL._
SYLVIAL ••••••• cox.......... v ,,,.,.,
CULVER •••..•• v ~ ~GARTHEl •.••••••• EVANS........ V ,,,,,,.,,..
WEDDLE .••.••••• FOX ....•••••. ~ ~
PRIEST .••••.••• FRESE. .•.•••• ~ .t:::::::_.
EVANS) •••••••••• GARTHE •....•• ~ ~
GLOCKNER •.•• ~ ~
!
DE J~sus) ...... HOLT ...•••••• ~ K_
THOM) ••••...•••• KAYWOOU ••••• ~ ~
LACAYO) .•••••.•• MAC LAIN ••.. ~~
ROGER SL ••••••• MC INNIS ••.• -JL._ ~ __
DAVIS) •••••••.•• MEYER .•.••••• ~~
OLSON .••••••• -L-~
(WI EDER) •••••••• PATTINSON ••• _JC:_ ~
PERRY •••.•••• ~~
(DIEDRICH) •••••. RILEY ....•••• ~ ~.
RIMA .••.••••• ~~
:WILLIA~S) ..••• :ROEiERS .••••.• -==-__
ROGERS •••••••• RYCKOFF. ••••• ~ ~
EDGAR) ..•••.•••• SALTARELLI..~ ~
DIEDRICH) ..•••. SCHMIT ..••••• ~ L_
HOLLINDEN) ••••• SCOTT ......•. ~~
EDGAR) .•••••.••. SHARP........ V ....k::::_
SHENKMAN •••• ~ ...JL"__
(HOYT) •••.•••.••• SMITH .••.•••• -.+L-~
(YOUNG) •••..••..• STEVENS ••••• ~ -v':-
(HOLLINDEN) ••••• SVALSTAD •••• ~ ~
(GROOT) •.•••••••• WEDAA ..•••••• ~ ~
(MI LLERL .••••.• WE I SHAUPT •.• _L_ v
W I EDER • • • • • • --JL:__ ...&£::__
(TIPTONl. ••••••• WINN ••••.•••• ~ ~
(WARD) ••••.•.•••. WOOD .••.••••• _iL__ ...J£::_
(GRAHAML .•...•• YOUNG .••••••• ~ ~
OTHERS
HARPER
SYLVESTER
LEWIS
CLARKE
TAYLOR
BROWN
WOODRUFF
EWING
HOHENER
HOWARD
HUNT
KEITH
KENNEY
LYNCH
MADDOX
MARTINSON
PIERSALL
STEVENS
TRAVERS
6/9/76 JOIN1' MEETING
Introduced new Directos Pattinson and Shenkman
(6a) Report of the Joint Chairman
Winn reported that there would -be no Executive Committee meeting this month.
Advised that there would be an orientation meeting for Directors on June 16
at 5:30. For new Directors and any that would care to come and for further
enlightening.
He then commented that all of the Directors had been concerned about increased
cost of EIS Facilities Plan from $60,000 to $150,000 plus printing costs. Said
he sent letter to Paul DeFalco May 13th giving him and met him at the
Newporter Inn to discuss this and he said they would reconsider this. Read basic
part of letter. Reported we received letter from Richard Coddington who is the
Director of Construction Grants Program of EPA and he made some execuses and said
it has not been resolved yet. Read part of that letter. Letter said if Don Winn
felt a meeting was necessary, would be happy to meet with him. Winn said Ray
Lewis would be in contact with these people on the 17th and depending on the
results of his efforts, may necessitate a trip by Winn and possible one other
elected official.
(6b) Report of the General Manager
FAH reported that he had some good news . Said Clean Water ~ill HR 9560 finally
went to floor of House and passed 339 to 5. House has authori zed 17 billion
for three years and has provisions for ad valorem tax and deferrment of 1977
deadlines for secondary treatment. Said these things that we have been working
on will help us try to resolve differences with EPA. On Senate side have one
year extension and $500,000 funding program. They don't want to fool around
with bill this year. Just give money. Should put Senate in rather awkward
position and we will be pressing to get this to Congress. Said he thought it
would help if Directors could write to Senators Tunney and Cranston. Particularly
to Senator Tunney who is a member of the Public Works Committee and a friend of
Senator Muskie . Was asked when it was coming up in Senate and FAH said he didn't
know if they would take any action between now and June 30. Will know in another
week. Question asked if 208 funding was in that bill and was answered yes, it is.
FAH then read from House Committee report that went to floor . Said he thought
we were moving in the right direction, and should put pressure on Senator Tunney.
Directors then requested that FAH draft a letter to Senators Tunney and Cranston
and send to all Directors re HR9560.
(6c) Report of the General Counsel
TLW said there were a few items on the agenda that may generat e some questions
such as Conflict of Interest Code. Will answer then. No pending litigation
other than minor liability claims.
(33) DISTRICT 7 -Lazy B Estates, Inc. annexation request
Chairman Saltarelli requested that this item be moved up on the agenda because
some of District 7 Directors had to leave early.
TLW reported that request is to defer payment of certain portion of annexation
fees on basis that it is confined strictly to open space. No sewerage neede d.
·,
The owner sees no problem in deferring this for about 30 days. Said question
has been asked whether we can do it and in what manner can we protect the District
should the property develop later. TLW said we can do it and we can secure it
with the cooperation of owner by executing documents or agreement to have lien on
real property to be assured of collection of fees. Said in view of the fact
that the owner sees no problem in deferring, would recommend doing that and
could come back to Board with detailed staff report and meet with the owner
to develop a procedure and agreement. Norman Brock said a 30 day deferment
would be fine.
It was then moved and seconded to continue this item to the July 14th Board meeting.
Motion carried.
(lla-1) Resolution No. 76-97
Svalstad asked if this was the resolution with recommendations for 16 new people
and was answered yes.
(lla-2) Joint Operating Budget & Corf Budget
(lla-3)
JWS ·report
Svalstad said he thought the Joint Operating Budget was fine, but really couldn't
conceive and would vote against CORF. Would like to know what the budget would be
to take care of our increased hydraulic demand with respect to secondary treatment.
Said we shouldn't increase tax rate unless we were forced to by law. Would like
to see what budget would be on our hydraulicdemand to treat water with what we
feel is proper treatment.
REL then referred to five-year projection. Said non-grant funded projects are
basically those that we would fund ourselves without State and EPA funding.
Those listed above that are those required by law. Some of those will be allowed
to provide for hydrauliccapacity as well as better solids handling. If the budget
did not include secondary treatment, was not sure how much the difference would
be but would be significant. Reported that our District sewer program is trailing
off and we will now be placing our efforts here in the plant. We do take exception
to the need for secondary treatment and as reported by staff, are continuing our
efforts to place it into some rationale. Right now the law says secondary treatment.
Have received some relief. Is somewhere between primary treatment and secondary
treatment and there is going to be some change in there. Said we are now working
on JPL process which is a viable process, particularly as relates to suspended
solids. Don't think we can just stop and do nothing and go back to our old level
of treatment .. With this budget it does allow us to proceed .. Think there is
enough time to fall short as the law is now written. Right now this program is
to provide secondary treatment for 175 million gallons of sewage. Is nothing
in there for increased flows or the next 10-20 years. Maybe this is all we will
have to build but not sure.
Svalstad stated h'e didn't know how this relates to individual home owners. Would
like to see what· staff recommendations would be and what we would do if they
weren't forcing us into this position. Ray said it would be less but don't know
what it would be. Referred to page 2 of budget. Said in previous years were
high in other areas of need. Monies .shifted. Last year budget$98.9 million; this
year $95 million.
JWS reiterated that this shifts funds from one area to another. Tax rate won't
triple. District 3 are the ones with real problems.
-2-
('rtd)
REL added that because of timing, do allocate funds for September 1977. This
type of planning is necessary. Will not really obligate major funds until this
time next year. Depends on HR9560 and what comes out of Senate. JWS said have
to have these funds available if requested.
Svalstad said he thought if we can't get it sold between now and November, will
never get it sold. Smith said he supported Bernie's thoughts.
FAH said recommendation was to adopt budget but doesn't necessarily mean we are
going to spend it. This wouldn't have come up this year except State has this
money to get rid of. Districts have been put in position of jumping ahead. We
are doing the engineering which will take until this time next year. Will not
be letting a contract until then.
Svalstad said he thought we could come back later if we need tax increase.
FAH said he thought they should adopt budget and then at the time the individual
District budgets are prepared, if we run into a particular situation, could amend.
These budgets are not taxing budgets. Svalstad said that would be OK to him.
Saltarelli commented that he thought it is time the Districts are going to have
to use a good deal of foresite. Not sure what the new construction is going to
mean in the future. Would like to keep tax rates low but think we should begin
to plan for a very intelligent plan for tax rates .to assure continued operation
of fantastic new facilities and much new personnel. If we can do it in intelligent
manner, can avoid sizeable increase in tax rate. Think we should protect the
taxpayers from tremendous jump. Feel we should be passing budgets within the
next 2 or 3 years to be anticipating operation of new facilities.
JWS said if construction expenditures come down in next S~ years, then have to
operate and maintain -100% taxpayers.
Rycoff then asked regarding Operating budget and employees' agreements for wages
and benefits, said he would be interested to know who approves that--Directors
or Executive Committee. FAH said Directors give the staff guidelines.
Question also asked with regard to the existing plant, is the amortization
schedule build into budget? JWS said we have amortization but don't presently have
fund depreciation. Less than 3% a year. Is requirement of revenue program and
will be doing that in the future. Shenkman asked if there is a depreciation schedule
and was answered yes
Winn then advised that the equipment we put in now for secondary treatment will
handle increased flows if the ocean discharge requirements -are reduced. Svalstad
. said he felt 100% better after hearing that.
Items ll(a)(2) & (3) were then moved and seconded. Roll call vote for both items
together. Motion carried.
Svalstad then asked for summary report on game plan--where we are and where we
are going in order to resolve this secondary treatment situation. Had lost track
of situation. Asked FAH to send with next agenda. It was also requested to put
in report what it would cost individual taxpayers in each individual District
based on anticipated figures.
Waiver of connection fees
TLW advised Executive Committee recommended no action. Just to receive and file.
Moved & seconded to receive and file. (R & F what??)
-3-
Young stated that some of the Directors thought they should allow flex ibi l ity
in the future as our current ordinance doesn't give us flexibility. Said a 2/3
vote could allow the waiver of fees. Think we should cons ider doing our p art .
Winn indicated occasions like this have been about twice a nd have spent more
time and money on staff time than what waiver would be. Also feel tha t if
a city wants to do so, should come in and ·request it.
Voice vote on receive and file motion. Motion carried.
(12) Nominations for Joint Chairman & Vice Joint Chairman
(13-b)
Directors nominated for Joint Chairman: Wedaa, Scott & Winn
Moved nominations be closed.
Director Fox nominated for Vice Joint Chairman.
Moved nominations be closed.
Conflict of Interest Code
TLW briefly reported on background of code. Said Ex ecutive Committee requested
that he obtain a formal opinion from Fair Labor Practices Commission as to
whether Directors would need to file . Request has been made but have not received
an acknowledgement to d a te. Know that they are swamped in Sacramento and suspect
request has been put on the pile.
Said resolution contains effective date--January 1, 1977, so although we are
required to adopt it, we really have better than 6 months to do a variety of
things including any amendments necessary. The Code, as drafted, will apply both
to Directors and those certain enumerated employees of the Districts. Said
Directors may be getting somewhat of a conflicting recommendation of procedure
in their individual cities because as elected city councilmen they are covered
by provisions in Proposition 9. Everybody else in State must do according to Code
that is adopted. Cities will probably come to Directors with two codes--one very
brief and second one very similar to this one and will apply to employees with
possibility of financial conflict. Under this code does not apply to provisions
of Proposition 9.
Stated further that it was his opinion and r ecommendation that we attempt to
simply adopt a formal code that will apply to employees and Directors. Exhibit "A"
lists people covered by this. This is to reduce the p aperwork and get some degree
of uniformity. Will be different from one at their city or county but will be close.
Think Fair Labor Practices Board will not say that they don't have to file duplicate
so probably will have to . The financial evaluation of their holdings or interest
in real property or business investments and those do llar amounts are identical to
those set forth in Code. No variation in that.
Reported that this code h a s been distributed to cities and they may adopt
Section 3.7. Designed to come as close as possible to what was contained in
the Muskonie Bill three years ago. Said if you have a conflict and declare a n d·
give notice of it and rely upon an opinion of General Counsel, in the event a
conflict does come up, you will have the assurance that the Districts' attorney
will come down on this. Get an opinion as to whether it exists and rely on that
opinion. Said that throughout our community have people who don't like what
we do and are quick to . file a harrassment suit. Will have to move quickly. If
we don't have somebody f i le lawsuit one year later, wheels of progress may co me
to hault. State Commission has tacitly approved including these in the c ode.
-4-
.. . . -
(14-b)
Kaywood advised of a typographical error in Code on page 2 of the summary.
Top paragraph, last line--a business entity "owned" by, not "and" by.
Also questioned first page of Article !--effective date January 1, 1977, and
third page, Section 2.3--filing an initial disclosure statement within 30 days
of effective date. Says annual statement should be filed in the month of April
each year. Is that April, 1977 or one year later?
TLW advised that Proposition 9 request first statement must be filed within 30
d~ys. Will only require a business investments diclosure. Will not include
income disclosure. Second statement will be April 30, 1978.
Moved to close hearing.
TLW advised no written comments received.
Olson asked TLW question regarding a conflict of his. TLW said he would contact
him and advise later.
NASA Amendment
FAH reported that just a month ago we extended the NASA contract on JPL work.
It turned out after we thought we had all the numbers worked out, there was a
misunderstanding over a purchase order we issued some time ago. As a result of
that, they had proceeded with the work and in the calculation of what they needed
to complete the work, they did not include the $20,000. We are recommending that
this agreement that was entered into last month be amended to include this $20,000.
Question was asked if that was for design time and was answered yes.
He added that there was a misunderstanding of what our purchase order meant.
Was back when we got the first approval from State. Issued purchase order to
start work because contractual agreement was not worked · out. No reference was
made to purchase order and they added it. They failed to include that money in
the additional money requested last month.
Moved and seconded to approve resolution. Motion carried.
(15) Amending Annexation Policies
Wood questioned wording on amendment. Wondered if we weren't changing it to
accommodate proponents so they wouldn't have to pay the correct fee. TLW explained
that it was just the opposite.
Resolutions moved, seconded and carried.
-5-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
May 6, 1976
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2) 3) SJ 6J 7) & ll
WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 1976) 7:30 P,M,
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNT~IN VALLEY1 CALIFORNIA
TELEPHDN ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
TI1e nc-'xt regu1.ar meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, will
be held at the above hour and date.
Schedu 1 ~'<l Upcoming Meetings: ------··----------------·--
DISTRICT 11 1'\DJOURNEJ) rffG. ·-Monday, ~lay 2•1, 1976, 7:00 p.ra.,
llrn:tingtor:. Beach Counci 1 Chambers
EXEC:UTIVE cm1'11TTEE -Tuesday, June 1, 19'76, 5:30 p.m. (Tentative)
MAN AGE R'S AG ENDA RE PORT
County San itation Dist ri cts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
May 12, 1 9 7 6 -7:30 p.m.
Post Office Box 8 127
l 0844 Ell is Aven ue
Fo untai n Volley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 71 4
540-29 10
9 6 2-24 1 1
The following i s a brief exp l anation o f the more important ,
non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which
a r e not otherwise se l f -explanatory. Warrant lists are now en-
closed with the agenda material , summarizing bil l s paid since
t h e Apri l Joint Board meeting.
Jo i nt Boards
No . 9-a -Change Order No. 1 -Job No . PW -049 -New Water
We ll at Plant No . 1 .
The cont r actor has requested an extension of time of 45
calendar days on his current contract because of an emergency
c omm i tment . The staff recommends this change order for time
extens i on on l y , at n o cost to the Distri c t s , because the delays
wi ll not affect the Districts ' requir ements for the installatj_on
of the water wel l a t Pl ant No. 1 .
No. 9 ~b -Addendum No. 1 to Job No . E-079 -Rehabilitation
of Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station .
This addendum was issued pursuant to requests by certain
equipment contractors re garding the torsional analysis which
was to be completed and made a part of the drive system to be
submitted at the -time of the bid. Tors i onal information cannot
be developed until the successful bidder is named in order to
make the engines compatible with to-be -purchased gear and pump
equipment.
Th e staff r ecommends appr oval of t h is addendum to the plans
a nd spec i fications for this job .
No . 9 -c -Consideration of Award of Purchase Contract for
On e (1) Outfa l l Engine, Job No . E-079 .
Bids were opened for this equipment o n May 3, 1976 . Three
bids were received , ranging in price from $76,318 to $99,250.98 .
We therefor e recommend award of a pur chase contract to the
low bidder , Waukesha Engine Service, Inc ., for one (1) engine
i n the amount of $76 ,3 1 8 , and that we proceed , as previously
a u thorized , in the n egotiated purchase o f the two (2) "used "
engines from P&S Repa i r Service for $55 ,600 each , p l us tax
($3,336) and freight (estimated at $1 ,100). ·Total price , in-
cl uding tax and freight -$60 ,036 each .
No. 9-d -·Request for Approval of Directors ' Fees and
Compen sation.
I t i s requested that the Joint Boards authorize payment of
compens a tion to the Joint Cha i r man and a Director for attending
meetings on behalf of the Districts as described in the agenda .
No. 9-e -Amendment to PERS Agreement .
Resoluti on No . 76 -84 formalizes the action taken by the
Boards on April 14th , to depool from the PER S funding pool, and
pr ovides for one-year fina l compensation basis for r e tirement ·
benefits. This action will reduce the percentage of Districts'
contrib ution to the PERS and is c onsistent with the Districts'
objective of transf e rring to the Orange County Employees Retir e -
ment System, which is presently under consideration . We h ave
just been advised by PERS that under our pr esent situation, the
Districts ' contribution to PERS will be 11.51%. Depooling will
reduce the Districts contribution effective July 1st , to 7 .96%,
which r epres ents a savings of $37,870 for the corning year.
Districts Nos. 1 and 7
No. 9-f -Design Fee for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer .
Pursuant to the District No . 1 Board 's authorization, the
staff has ne got iated with Boy l e Engineering Corporation for t h e
engineering design to be accomp lished for the proposed Raitt Street
Trunk. The total estimated cost, including construction engineer-
ing d esign , surveying, con struction inspection, and incidental
costs is approximately $1~ mi llion . We have negotiated a fee for
the proposed project of $65 ,900 , which does not include the field
survey services and construction staking . The necessary survey -
ing will b e performed on a per diem basis at the hourly rates
included in the engineering firm's proposal dated May 5th .
The cost of this facility will b e shared by Districts Nos.
1 and 7 in accordance with the following:
Di strict No. 1
District No. 7
95%
5%
It is the staff 's recommendation that the proposal of Boyle
Engineering Corporation be a ccepted .
-2-
, ,.
District No. 2
No. 9-g -Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Req u est for Annexation
of Territory to Sanitation District No . 2 .
Included with the agenda material is a l etter requesting
annex ation of 26.382 ac re s to Sanitation District No. 2. The
action appearing on the agenda is to refer the matter to the
District's staff for study and recommendation.
District No. 3
No. 9-h -Sewer Service for La Habra Heights Area, Los Ange le s
County .
The staff has had discussions with representatives of the Ci ty
of La Habra and the Los Angeles County Engineers ' office to con-.
sider possible sewer service for unincorporated areas in Los Angeles
County tributary to the Santa Ana Bas i n . The waste treatment flows
from this area are minimal (1/4 mgd). It is anticipated that a
3 -way agreement will be developed involving the City of La Habra ,
the County of Los Angeles and District No . 3 . However , because the
Districts' flows are reaching existing treatment plant capacity and
the State and EPA have been reluctant to authorize construction of
additional capacities, actual connections may not be permi tted for
some time to come . The action appearing on the agenda receives
and files the County of Los Angeles request and refers it to the
staff for study and recommendation .
No. 9-i -Stop Notice on Contract No . 3 -20 -2.
The Districts have received a Stop Notice in the amount of
$585 against the ·Districts ' contractor.
District No. 5
No. 9-j -Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for
Collection of District Connection Fees .
We have receive d a request from the City of Newport Beach to
ame nd the current agreement for collection of District connection
fees. The current agreement provides for a 5% administrative fee
payab l e to the City by the District upon invoicing, based on the
do llar amount of District connection fees collected by the City .
Their Finance Director wishes to deduct the 5% fee from the monthly
remittance, rather than invoicing the District separately . This
procedure is used in Districts 2 and 3 , and is currently proposed
to be used in District No. 7,
I t is the staff 's recommendation to app r ove the request of
Newport Beach.
-3-
District No . 7
No. 9-k -Ordering Annexation No. 42 ~ Tract No. 8640.
In October, 1974, the Board authorized the initiation of
annexation proceedings for Tract No. 8640 to annex approxi -
mately 23 acres in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero
Drive. The property will be divided into single-family resi -
d ential lots and the wastewater discharge will be consistent
with the flows anticipated by the Districts ' Master Plan. We
have now received Local Agency Formation Commission approval and
the proponent has paid the District 's annexation fees . The staff
recommends adoption of Resolution No. 76 -86 -7, ordering annexation.
No. 9 -1 -Ordering Annexation No . 46 -Tracts 8799 and 8827 .
In March, 1975, the Board authorized initiation of proceedings
to annex 62.64 acres in the vicinity of Orange Park Acres Boulevard
and Chapman Ave nue. The following special conditions were p l aced
on this annexation:
(1) That annexation fees for Tract No . 8827 (19+ acres)
would be due and payable prior to final approva l
of Annexation No. 46. The proponent was to
execute a note for the balance of the unpaid
annexation fees (based on approximately 42 acres
(Tract No. 8799) $41,460) and a Deed of Trust
with an Assignment of Rents to the District
to secure said note .
(2) Semi-annual payment of interest on said note at
the rate of 7% per annum .
(3) Payment of unpaid Dis trict No . 7 annexation fees
in effect at the time the Tract No. 8799 map is
recorded , but in no event lat er than July 1, 197 7 .
The District is in receipt of the annexation fees fo r Tract
No. 8827, the executed Promissory Note, and other n ec essary
documents, including approval of the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission. It is the staff 's recommendati on that the Board formally
approve Annexation No . 46 in the City of Orange.
No. 9-m -Request for Annexation of Tract No. 8745 -Annexation
No. 54.
Last month, the Board referred a request for annexat i on of
22 acres in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and the proposed ex -
ten sion of Crawford Canyon Road to the staff for a recommendation.
The development proposed meets the District low -density r esident ial
-4-
criteria which has been established for this area in th e District
Master Plan and the property is within the City of Orange . The
staff recommends that the Board adopt Reso l ution No . 76 -88 -7,
initiating annexation proceedings.
District No . 11
No. 9-n -Change Order No . 2 to Contrac t No . ll -4R -Rem o d el
Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities.
This change order adjusts the engineer 's quantities and grants
a t ime extension of 66 calendar days for material de lays s u s tained
by the contractor . The adjustments of the engineer's quanti tie s
adds s i x lineal .feet to .the perimeter block wa l l at a total change
in the amount of $157 .31 . The staff recommends acceptance of this
change order .
No. 9 -o -Accepting Contract No. ll-4 R as Complete .
The contractor , Clifford L . Thompson Construction Company, has
completed the remodeling of the Newland -Bamilton Pumping S tation
facilities in accordance with the plans and specifications . This
contract was for the rehabilitation of the exterior of the pumping
facilities; including landscapin g , paving and perimeter block wall
to make the facilities more compatible with the existing develop -
ments in the area. Southern California Gas Company cooperated in
this project by payin g for work included in the contract which
affected their adjacent faci l ities. Final a dj usted contract price
for this project is $21,193 .26 which is well below the budget amount
of $40,000 as authorized in this year 's budget .
The staff recommends acc ept ance of the work and authorization
to file the Notice of Completion on this project.
All Districts
No . 11 -Report of the Executive Committ ee .
The Committee met on May 4th and enclosed for the Directors
is a writ te n r ep ort of their discussions and recommended items
for .consid eration by the Boards .
No . 13 -Staff Progre ss Report on J PL -AC TS Pilot Plant Facili ty .
The staff will make a slide presentatio n and briefly review
the stat us of this project, detai ling some of t he construct ion
procedures employed in constructing this 1 mgd fac ility in less
than six months.
-5-
District No. 1 1
No. 28 -Adjournment to May 24th.
The staff is recommending that the Board adjourn to 7:00 p.m.,
Monday, May 24th , for the purpose of meeting jointly with the
Huntington Beach City Council in a workshop session to discuss the
proposed District Master Plan which is being prepared by Keith and
Associates, consulting engineers to the District .
-6-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager