Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-06-09COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 3, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8) & 11 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9, 1975, 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, C~ili fornia, will be held at the above hour and date. Jcretary Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: DIRECTORS' ORIENTATION MEETING -Wednesday, J-:.me 16, 1976, 5:30 p.m. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 .~ MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS June 9, 1976 -7:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are now enc losed with the agenda material, summarizing the bills paid since the May Joint Board meeting. Joint Boards No. 8-a -Approving Change Order No. 1 to Job No . J-6-lB. In September, 1974, one bid was received for the furnishing of the equipment and the installation of additional pumping facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. The Boards rejected this single bid and instructed the staff to procure the necessary equipment under separate equipment contracts and sub- sequently award a contract for the installation of said equipment. Bids were received concurrently for the furnishing of the engines, as well as the pumps and gear drives. Later it was discovered that to mitigate the vibration problems of the engines to be located on the second floor of the Outfall Booster Station, 22-inches of additional foundation were required for stabilization. The pump manufacturer quoted .the pump shafts based on a shorter length, and a change order for the additional 22-inches is required to meet the final design installation . It is the staff's recommendation that this change order in the amount of $11,958.92 for the additional pump extensions be a pprove d. No. 9-c -Acceptance of Job No. J-6-lC. This contract to provide two tilting disc check valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station is now complete. The supplier has furnished the required equipment under this contract. The action appearing on your agenda authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion. No. 9-d -Change Order No. 1 -Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8. This cooperative street improvement project at Plant No. 2 between the Districts and the City of Hu ntington Beach initially included in the original bid the installation of street lights, underground wiring and appurtenant electrical pull boxes. In Addendum No. 1 to the bid proposal, the street lighting facilities were deleted at the request of the City because of contractual difficulties with the Southern California Edison Company. Now that these contractual agreements have been consuwmated, the City has requested that the street lights be included in the project by change order in the amount of $13,600.22. The cost will be part of the City's responsibility on this project. It is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that this change order be approved. No. 8-e -D.etermining Prevailing Wage Rates for Construction Work by Outside Contractors. The State Government Code requires that we adopt, periodically, a resolution determining the prevailing labor rates for public works construction contracts. Since t his resolution is quite lengthy, it is not included in the agenda material although it will be available for inspection at the meeting. It should be emphasized that this resolution does not establish wage rates for our employees; it involves only employees of contractors engaged in construction work for public projects. No. 8-f -Financial Report. Include d with the agenda material is the Distri cts ' Financial Report for the nine-month period ended March 3 1 st . The Director of Financ e is recommending several budget trans f ers for reasons stated in the report. If any Director ha s questions concerning the Financial Report and the recommended budget transfers, p lease call either Wayne Sylvester, the Distric~s 1 · Director of Finance, or Fred Harper, telephone 5 40-2 9 10. No. 8-g -General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel at Meetin gs . For the past several years, the Gene ral Manager ha s been authoriz ed , on an annual basis, to designate mem b ers of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, etc., within the State, which he believes will be of value to the Districts. It is recommended that this authorization be renewed. No. 8-h -AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management, July 21-23. The Districts' Director of Finance has b een invited to part i- cipate in a sc heduled AMSA technical conference on finance and management for wastewater agencies to be held in Seattle July 21~23. It is the staff's recommendation that the authorization be given for participation in this meeting. -2- No. 8-i -Authorization for Execution of Specified Documents. From time to time, we are required to submit proof that the General Manager has authority to execute documents on behalf of the Districts. The resolution appearing in the agenda specifying this authorization has been prepared by the General Counsel. It is our recommendation that the resolution be approved. No. 9-j -Authorizing Payment of Overtime .for Supervisory Accounting Personnel. During the past month, key accounting employees have been absent from work due to extended illnesses. This situation has resulted in the need for other accounting personnel to work over - time. Since this particular time of the year ·requires the closing of the books as well as the preparation of the budge ts for the coming year, we are requesting authority to pay overtime to supervisory personnel to avoid hiring additional people on a temporary basis. This requested authorization will expire September 30th . District No. 1 No. 8-k -Document Maps for Sewer Right-of-Way . The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems within the District. Since the work involved little professional judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order for the work as outlined. · The fees submitted from the five firms were as follows: (1) $1,091 (2) $2,400 (3) . $4,000 (4) $9,000 (5) $12,487 The staff had estimated that the cost for these outside services would be approximately $2,000. The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in the amount of $1,091. They have indicated that they are completely aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee as sub- mitted. It is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that the proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be accepted. -3- Districts Nos. 1 and 7 No. 8-1 -Environmental Impact Assessment for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer Construction. The actions appearing on the agenda initiate the preparation of a draft Environmental Impact Report relative to the proposed construction of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewe r. The trunk will connect to the Districts ' Sunflower facility and will cost about $1 .5 million. This facility is includ ed in the Districts ' Master Plans. District No. 2 No. 8 (m)-(n). Acceptance of Contracts Nos . 2 -14-3A and 2-14-4A. These contracts were for the furnishing of manhole frames and covers for Contracts Nos. 2 -1 4 -3 and 2-14-4, which are presently und e r construction . The supplier has furnished all of the material requ ired under the contract . The staff recommends acceptance of the work and authorization to file a Not ic e of Com- pletion. District No. 5 No. 8 -q -Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Back Bay Trunk Sewer. . . The actions appearing on the' agenda rel ative to the preparation of a n egative environmental declarati on for the construction of the Back Bay Sewer (east side) is pursu ant to the District 's guidelines impl ementing the Env ironmental Qual i ty Act of 1970 . Because the area tributary to the sewer is pre sently 85% developed or approved for development, the staff is rec ommending the preparation of a n egative environmental dec laration. No. 8 -r -Authorization to Advertise and Receive Bids for Purchase of 24 -Inch Ductile Iron Pipe for Construction of the Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 5 -20A . The District 's staff , working with the Department of Fish and Gam e , have agreed that no construction will be done during the migratory foul breeding and storm seasons, generally October 15 to March 1. In order to construct this facility prior to October 15, it is necessary to procure the ductile iron pipe re- quired for this job because of the long lead time required for manufactur ing this mater ial. It is anticipated that the con- tract or will cow.rnence work on or about August 15th . It is proposed that this pipe be purchased and furni shed to the -4- contractor to meet this tight construction schedule. It is recommend ed that the Board authorize the advertisement and receipt of bids for 8,600 feet of pipe at an engineer's estimate of $250,000. It is recommended that biITs for this material b e received on July 6th and award be made by the Board at the regular July meeting. District No. 6 No. 8-s -Document Maps for Sewer Right of Way. The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems within the District. Since the work involved little professional judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order for the work as outlined. The fees submitted from the five firms were as follows: (1) $1,521 (2) $3,699 (3) $4,000 (4) $7,500 (5) $12,487 The staff had estimated that the cost for these putside services would be approximately $2,000 . The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in the amount of $1,521 . The firm has indicated that t hey are com- pletely aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee as submitted and it is, therefore, the staff 's recommendation that the proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be accepted. · District No. 7 No. 8-t -Initiation of Proceeding s for Proposed Annexation No. 52. The staff has r e viewed the proposed annexation of 1.38 acres located at 20202 Amapola Street in the vicinity o f Orange Park Boulevard and Amapola. Th is is an existing single family develop - ment in the City of Orange and it is the staff's rec ommendation that Resolution No. 76-108-7 authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings be approved. No. 9-u -Ordering Annexation No. 49, Tract No . 8306 . In October, 1975, the Board authorized the initiation of annexation proceedings for Trac t No . 8306 (City of Orange) to annex approximate l y 11 acres in the vicinity of Santiago Road -5- extending to a point westerly of Santiago Creek . The property will be divided into single family residential lots and the wastewater discharge will be consistent with the flows anticipated by the District's Master Plan. We now have received approval from the Local Agency Formation Commission and the proponent has paid the District's annexation fees. The staff recommends adoption of Reso lution No . 76-109-7, ordering annexation. No. 8 -v -Acc eptance of Sew e r Easement . Resolution No. 7 6 -110-7 accepts an easement for a loc a l sewer constructed in a privat-e street in the vicinity of La Co lina Drive and Brownin g Avenue. It is recommended that the action authorizing acceptance of this easement , at no cost to the District , be approved . -No. 8-w -Acceptanc e of -Sewer -Eas emen t from LerneP Oil Company-,-Inc . , Contract No . 7 -4 A. It has been recent ly discovered that when a subtrunk sewer , Co ntract No. 7-4A, ~as constructed through a private right of way betwe en El Camino Real and "B" Street in the City of Tustin in 1963 , the proper sewer easement was not obtained . The staff and General Counsel have met with the attorneys f or the Oil Company, and it has been mutually agreed that a fair market va lue for th is easement is $1,800 . It is, therefore, recommended that Resolution No. 76-111 -7 be approved authorizing acceptance of this easement and payment to Lerner Oil Company, Inc., in the amount of $1 ,800. Joint Boards Nos. 10 and 11 -Report of the Executive Committee . The Committee met on June 1st and enclosed for the Directors is a written report of their discussions and rec ommended it ems for considerat ion by the Boards . No. 12 -Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman . As provided in the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure, nominations for thes e two offices are made at the regular June meeting , with elections to take place at the July regular Joint Board meeting . For the new Directors' information, we have included in the supporting document s section of the agenda material, an excerpt from the Rules of Procedure for Meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization . No. 13 -Hearing on Proposed Conflict of In terest Code for District Directors and Specified Emplo y ees . Pur suant to the Boards ' authorization in May, a public hear ing i s scheduled Wednesday evening on the proposed Conflict of Interest -6- Code for the County Sanitation Districts. Copies of the Code have been mailed to all Directors and affected employees. As of this date, no written com.ments have been received. If any Director has any questions concerning the Code's provisions, please call the Districts' General Counsel, Tom Woodruff , (714) 835-6212. No. 14 -Amendment to NASA Contract, JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant Facility. At the April 14th Board meeting, the Board amended the original contract entered into with National Aeronaut ics and Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory of California Institute of Technology to provide the necessary services for the design, start-up and operational phases of the 1 -MGD Pi lot Plant Facility from $280,000 to $333,726. There wa s an apparent oversight of a $20,000 effort made in April and May, 1975, which should have been considered in this revised contract amount. Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter from the Pasadena Office of NASA detailing the oversight by not inc l ud ing this $20,000 effort. It is the staff's recommendation that the amended contract amount with NASA should be adjuste d to $353,726. Districts 2,3,5,7,11 No .. 15 -Amending Annexation Policies. The staff is reco~mending that the provisions for payment of the annexation fees be amended to read that the date of payment of annexation fees govern the amount of the fee payable. Currently, the fee is determined as of the date of the formal annexation approval by the Board of Directors. This creates problems, in that, on July 1st of each year, the annexation fee changes, based on the assets and liabilities of the Districts on that date; there- fore any pending annexations are subject to increases in fees. The recommended change in language would permit a proponent to pay currently-established fees at the time of application for annexa- tion. The staff recommends the adoption of the runending resolu- tions listed on the agenda. District No. 2 No. 19 -Acquisition of Permanent Easement for Realignment of the Yorba Linda Force Main. During the course of construction of Contract No. 2 -16-2, the Yorba Linda Force Main from Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard , the contractor encountered a large storm drain which interfe res with the construction of the sewer as originally proposed . This -7- ' , •1. obstruction has forced the realignment of the sewer to a position which requires acquisition of a permanent easement on pr ivat e property . The staff has negotiated with Calprop Corporation for the required easement and recommends payment in the amount of $7 ,000 for the right of way . District No . 8 No. 28 -Substitution of South Coast County Water District as a Member Agency of District No . 8. The General Counsel is recommending that the Board adopt Resolution No. 76 -112 -8 , confirming substitution of the South Coast County Water District as a member agency of District No . 8 in place of the South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code, Section 4730 . This action is the resu lt of the consolidation of the San i tary District with the Water District . District No. 7 No. 33 -Request for Annexation -Lazy B Golf Course. The District has received an annexation request from the owners of Lazy B Estates, Inc ., in the Orange Park Acres area lying between Randall Street and Am a pola Avenue, consisting of approximat ely 108 acres . The owners have requested that 50.51 acres of the annexation be exempt from annexation fees because the areas will not be developed to contribute any sewage flow to the sanitary sewer system . The re quested "exempted area 11 will be a golf course , driving range and equestrian trail . In 1 972 , a similar requ es t was granted by the District No . 2 Board to the City of Anaheim to exempt a public golf course in the Anaheim Hills area. The exemption agreement provided that in the event any of the exempted land requ i red sewer service , the area to be develop ed would be subject to fees equal to then appl icable District annexation charges and any other fees that may be in effect at that time . Th e staff is requesting the Board 's direction in this matter . Because of the private ownership status of the request ed exempt property, the staff feels this would be extremely di ff icult to administer and to collect fees due the District if and when the land use would change on any portion of the 50 acres . -8- Fred A. Harper Gen eral Manager DISTRICTS 3 & ll rITMS ON SU PPLE MENTA L AG ENDA FILE •......••.•...•••• LE TIER •···••·•··•·•• A/C .•.. TKLR ••.• --····-···-····--·--· •••••••••••••••••••••••O• (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following cities regarding e lections of mayors and appointment of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) City · District Active Al ternate Fullerton 3 Frances Wood Robert Ward* Huntington Beach 3 Ron Patt i nson Ha r riett Wieder* 11 Harriett Weider* 11 Ron Shenkman Los Alamitos 3 Phillip E. Cox* Charles E. Sylvia Seal Beach 3 Thomas Bl ackman* Russell B. Gray ·' II BOAnos OF DIRECTons County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ADJGUP.~:r.~E:ffS POSTED.: MEET I NG DATE COMP & MILEAGE ..... ~ .... .. FILES SET UP ...... a--.'. ...... . JU ME 9 1976 7 30 p M ·RESOLur:o~;s crnr1FiED .. ~ ll .) -: I I LETiE~S f:RiTIEN ............. . MINUTES WRiTTEN ...... ~. THE JO I NT CHA I RMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DI RECTOR MINUTES f-ILED ............... - W I TH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE MEETING. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. ~ See supplemental agenda • (5) EACH DISTRICT (6) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 May 12, 1976 regular District 2 May 12, 1976 regular District 3 May 12, 1976 regular District 5 May l?, 1976 regular District 6 May 12, 1976 regular District 7 May 12, 1976 regular District 8 April 14, 1976 :regular District 11 May 12, 1976 regular, and ~ ~~lit ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: ~ Joint Chairman General Manager (c) General Counsel '• (7) ALL DISTRICTS Ron CALL vorr .......... -Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) "A" and "D" DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) II B" DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO: ·6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) "C" DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C" (8) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 8(A) THROUGH 8( w) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall he considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- ·, (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) FILE __....._... __ _.. ~ LETTER ........................ ". A/C •••• TKLR .... __ ... ________ ------···-· ... FILE ---······---. ~~ -----· ... A/C .... TKLR ··-~&Q~~ ~·~ ._.,... .,,~ .~ '• . -~··· Fi LE ---··-------...... ~···""\ ..;: \._ LETTER ............... A/C •••. TKLR •••• ~------ -----~ FILE ................ -·-- LETTER .................... - A/C .••. TKLR -· ----------- ~I~P FILE •..•.....••.....•• LETTER ·······-····· A/C •••• TKLR •••• ···-··-······-------· _____________ ... FILE·······- LETTER ···-·······- A/C _ •• TK1.R -· -·----------- ------·····----- FILE ...... ~·-··· tmER ..•.••••••.••• A/C •••• TKLR •••• ALL DISTRICTS (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pump and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, authorizing an addition of $11,958.92 to the contract with McCalla Bros. to increase base plate elevation. See page "E" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-95, approving Addendum No. 1 to the purchase contract with McCalla Bros. for Pump and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, in form approved by the General Counsel, to provide for payment of sales tax directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California, and amending progress payment provisions (does not affect total contract price) ·See page "F" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-96, accepting Tilting Disc Check Valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. _2, Huntington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lC, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. ~ee page "G" Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, authorizing an addition of $13,600.22 to the contract with Fleming Construction for trenching and underground vaults in connection with City of Huntington Beach improvements incorporated into said contract, Districts to be reimbursed by City for said cost. See page "H" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-93, determining the prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts' construction contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding Resolution No. 75-85 (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31, 1976; and approving recommended budget transfers (mailed with agenda material) (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses incurred (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to attend and participate in the AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management of Wastewater Agencies to be held in Seattle, Washington on July 21-23, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, -1odging-and--±ncidenta1-expenses· incurred (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) (me .. ~: .. r;~.,.,,,.....-ALL DISTRICTS (continued) (LE1TER .. vf.~~-(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-94, authorizing Fre d A. Harper, A/c •••• TK~~ •••• General Manager, to sign all contracts and documents not required ~.L:?!--~~_:,Vl{ to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. See ----·-page "I" FILE ................ .. LE1iER .....•....•.•• A/C ...• TKLR •••• (§) ... :::: ...... _ ~'?.L­LETTER ············- A/C .•.. TK LR ••• -~---~ ___ .............. .. ~ .. .V.'. ... ~ U:TTER ••....••...... A/C .... TKLR .... --·--·--··---- '...-.-····--··- FI LE ••••.••.••..••.••• (j) Consideration of motion granting temporary a uthority for payment of overtime to Districts' Principal Accountant up to September 30, 1976, due to extended illness of other accounting staff personnel DISTRICT 1 (.k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,091.00 . See page "J" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 (1) Considerations of actions relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Impleme nting the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as am en ded: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "K" LETTE~ ~~~~!..-' (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare draft Environmental Impact Report relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer ---·-~·--·--···--···"' FllE __ ...,.. LETTER ·-- A~··- ···---------... FI LE" ........... -.... . LETTER ............ _ ~'-~.Z --•oUOUUooo•- FILE>-... ~ ...•. LETTER ... ~ ..•• A/C .... TKLR •••• Fl.) ... ~.: .. '(;/""' ~J.. ......... - A/C .... TKLR •••• ,,,.,.,.. _________ .. ___ _ DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-105-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames , Contract No .. 2-14-3A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion . See page "L" (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-106-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer;Ma nhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "M" DISTRICT 3 (o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Solomon Shapiro, dated May 20, 1976, in the amo unt of $50,000.00 in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, and refer to the contractor and District's liab ility insurance carrier for appropriate action (p) Consideration of motion to deny leave to file late claim by Karen L. Morton for lack of sufficient showing of excusable neglect relative to a claim in connection with construction of the Knot-t-Int-erceptor.,--a-P..ortion-of -Reach 7, ··Contract .No ··--3-20-2 ,. -... as recommended by the General Counsel (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (8) f:t'E. __ _ LETTER·····---- A/C •... TKLR - ----- FILE ·······---~­ LEmR ··-·-··-····· A/C '..:." •• TKLR •••• ?~~~, ~e ... :~.~··········­ LETTER ·······-····· ~C •••• TKlR • .,.. ~~~;~.(. -'"""· , fFILE ~--·-'-----nc:r LETTER .l.'::..·-··- A/C ... 7 ·· .. ~--········ ..,_....._.-··- A/C •... TlClR •••• Fi LE ..••.••..•••.••••• ~-s."is ~~-~Ylf' A/C .... TKLR •••• @:---~-----.-.:-z;_ __ _ ~ "\/""" ~R_.-+·-··- A./C .... TKLR - -~ f.U: .. , ... le.--···~ ---·· v LETTER ·-····-····-...._ __ .- (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of actions relative to Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "N" (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare negative declaration declaring that the Bay Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) will not have a significant effect on the environment and directing the filing of notice thereof (r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids for purchase of 24-inch Ductile Pipe for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side), Contract No. 5-20A DISTRICT 6 (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,521.00. See page "0" ---- DISTRICT 7 (t) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-108-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1.3834 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Street and Handy Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 52 -St. Amand Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) (u) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-109-7, ordering annexation of approximately 11.165 acres to the District in the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extended to a point westerly of Santiago Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 49 -Tract No. 8306 to County Sanitation District No. 7) (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-110-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from La Colina Associates, a California Limited Partnership, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer service in connection with a sewer line southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue, at no cost (w) to the District. See page "P" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-111-7, approving and authorizing execution of agreenent with Lerner Oil Company, Inc. for right of way in connection with Contract No. 7-3A-4A, Sub-Trunks; authorizing payment in the amount of $1,800.00; and accepting Grant of Easement in connection with said right of way. See page "Q" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -5- (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (10) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive ''1E ·••••·••·•••••··•• Committee: LETI'ER •••••••••••••• Ale .... TKLR .... (a) Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget: _______ .. __ _ -----··--..... Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of motion approving 1976-77 personnel requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 76-97 amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-167 (Copy of resolution in Directors' .meeting folders) FILE ···············-_, (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77 Joint Operating Budget LEmR ---~ROLL CALL VOTE ...... :.~.-- A/C .... TKtR -r_ __ . ·······-··-··-® ROLL CALL VOTE ........ __ Consideration ·of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) FILE ~-.;~-~-~· .. , LETTER ···········-· (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor A/C ••.. TKtR .... ('i\ 1 ·~ for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1976, and declaring.that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1976-77 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts r FILE •• ../!........... (b) '-· LETI'ER •.•••••••••••• Af~ ... TKLR !h \ $ ~. 0 'l/t . ----·--·- . 1-,, U . v-· (c) ~········ ........ ., LETTER ............ ,, A/C .... TKlll .. ,, /Y\ )~ --ftt!-···············~~~ LETTER ............ .. A/C .... TICLR ... . . , "r v.,A ,· ' ·• ~ ,-L~! ... L-.... ( e) ~-·M1:s ~t~·~~: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for Security Monitoring System, Specification No. PW-054, for an amount not to exceed $13,000 for installation and maintenance for the first year, plus cost of annual maintenance thereafter Consideration of motion approving concept of value engineering procedures relative to the design of 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with Federal and· State guidelines, to provide cost-effective design of said facility Discussion re amending connection charge ordinances in Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 to permit waiver of all or portion of connection fees under special circumstances. Consideration of motion approving nominations of Frances Wood, Chairman, District No. 3, (member) and Fred A. Harper, General Manager, (alternate) as the Districts' representatives on the Southern California Association of Governments 208 Program Committee .....,,, (12) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page -----"R" -6- (13) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8 & 11 Hearing on proposed Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County: (a) Open hearing ~· . ..!57 (b) Report of General Counsel (c) Actions to date: (1) Resolution No.· 76-90, setting time and place of hearing adopted on May 12, 1976 by District$ Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 (2) Notice (resolution) published May 21, 1976 (Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11) Santa Ana Register (3) Notice published May 28, 1976 (District 8) Daily Pilot (4) Notice of hearing, resolutuion and copy of Code mailed to affected parties on May 28, 1976 or June 1, 1976 Fl~ . .:··:·;····:~·,··v1 (d)' _Writ-ten __ CO~ (. LEmR --~~-~ . ~c ~~<.J(e) Oral comments, if any . \. ._..,_.o . ,___ (f) Close hearing q '. oq Roll Call Vote or cast (g~ Consideration of Resolution No. 76-99 adopting Conflict of Interest Unanimous Ballot f{\ \ti} Code. See page "S" FILE ••••••••.•• TI4) ALL DISTRICTS LmER ············- : •.• JKLR ·:.:· ,... (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from National ~~-~1Lk.> 1 Aeronautics and Space Administration, dated May 25, 1976, in ~~"'f~L.N\rs,---, connection with JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility. See page "T" ~(b))Consideration of Resolution No. 76-98, authorizing amendment to the V ~c t contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re Roll Call ote or as C S . · h · f · f unanimous Ballot \ (.. JPL-A T process, increasing t e maximum amount or services rom FILE ............ _ (VI. \C\ $333, 726 to $353, 726 for additional pre-design work. See page "U" ·---···" LETTER ........... ~ (15)/ DISTRICTS 2,3,5, 7 & 11 Consideration of the following resolutions amending Section 1, Subsection (b), of the annexation policy resolutions of the respective Districts providing for the change indicated below: A/C .... TKLR -..._ -_., Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot ml s (a) M/" (b) M / ~ (c) i\t\I s Cd) Al/ s (e) DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT 11 Resolution No. 76-100-2 76-101-3 76-102-5 76-103-7 76-104-11 Amending Resolution No. 75-42-2 75-43-3 75-15-5 75-44-7, as amended 75-49-11 Delete sentence: "The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established." Add sentence: "The date of payment of annexation acreage fee to the District shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established." -7- (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DI~TRICT 1 oi~~n-s~merrtal agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn q: 11 (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-107-2, authorizing acceptance Roll Call Vote or Cast of Grant of Easement from Calprop Corporation for a permanent easement UniJ)imous Ballot • • • h h l · f y b L · d F · (f ~-··········-in connection wit t e rea ignment o or a in a orce Main rom ~~---------"~]~ Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard), Contract No. 2-16-2, and authorizing A/C ••.• TKLR •••• payment in the amount of $7,000.00 for said easement. o.... •• A J:" ... ¥ ~ ~CtQ P.i..., -trlri.li." ... , CJJW-t.l.v........, ~~----· (20) \DISTRICT 2 ----1 --·r ~-\Other bus ·. ess and commurri<;ations_.o>'-SUppl emental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (/;)_]) (22) ~!STRICT 3 ----·-~ Q.:t~iness and communications or supp-lem~nda i terns' if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn frJ,o (24) !;>!STRICT 5 "B~j,_nes ~1ons o-r-supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn ~·..]...D (26) DIS?TRICT 6 Ot~s---nd upplemental agenda items, if any FILE ···············~·· . 2 7) ~~. .M"--L ·{J~ L 11 -( AJC •... TKLR •.•• ~--~8) ......... -.. ·--··-···- Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanim ous Ballot (29) (30) (31) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn CJ~ DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's memorandum dated June 3, 1976; and approving Resolution No. 76-112-8, confirming the substitution of South Coast Cm,J.nt atet District;, as a member agency of the Districts in place of South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730. See pages "V" and "W" ·~mental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn q1':;t.,:i._ DISTJlikT 11 -. ~ Other bus:±nes-s-a:ru( communicat~_p.1e~ agenda items, if any -8- • (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn t/:c:L) (33) DISTRICT 7 FILE ·······-··-··-(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Lazy B LElTER ·--fl) )~states, Inc. for annexation of approximately 107. 876 acres A/C ~ of territory to the District in the Orange Park Acres area between _=-sl. d Randall Street and Amapola Avenue and refer to staff. See page ·, "X" ---·-··- (34) (35) (b) Discussion of Lazy B Estates, Inc. request for waiver of fees for portion of proposed annexation _ ~\,S). ~ \~ \ '\. ~ , DISTRICT 7 Ot coiilliruni-cations-Dr~1.-agenda items, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn t/: c:/3 -9- AGENDA ITEM NO. 8(f) Hay 26, 1976 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County! California . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT: of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. EOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALlfORNIA 92708 (714) 5-40-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1976 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1976, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. ·The statements surrunarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first nine months of the 1975-76 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1975-76 budgets for all Districts is $98.9 mill ion, of which approximately 82% is for capital expenditures for f~cilities improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are as follows: Budgeted Revenue Average Percent of Total Budget 1974-75 1975-76 Tax Revenue 19% Federal & State Construction Grants 22 Connection Fees 2 Other Revenues 6 Carry-over from Accumulated Construction Reserves -2.!._ 100% 19% 15 2 11 Budgeted Expenditures District Facilities Expansion and Reserves Joint Works Expansion and Reserves Debt Service Share of Joint Operations District Operations, Maintenance, and Other Average Percent of Total Bud9et 1914-75 1975-76 4li% 45% 41 37 4 4 5 5 6 _9 100% 100% Included in each District's statement is a surrunary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects, and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff reports relative to the current status on individual construction projects are included each month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting. Except for inventory control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. The inventory system is being phased in conjunction with the move to our new warehouse and establishment of revised warehousing and purchasing procedures which we expect to complete in the near future. The staff is· undertaking a review of the on-line ·computer system to assure maximum utilization of its capabilities, consistent with cost effectiveness. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '75-76 which were accrued in 1974-75 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained well within their respective 1975-76 total budget allocations. However, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were approved, budget transfers in certain categories will be necessary. The budget transfers which are more fully described in this report, and summarized on the last page, are recommended. CASH INVESTMENTS Earned interest of approximately $2.4 million from our continuing program of investing reserve funds (prhnarily~ capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accrued during the first nine months of fiscal 1975-76. As of March 31st, approximately 96i of the Districts' cash funds were investeo in short-term government securities or time deposits as shown belm-1. The balance of cash on hand was earning interest in conmingled investments with the County Treasurer's office. Amount Percent Cash on Hand $ 1,881 ,470 4. 1 Investments in Gov't Securities 44,545,738 ~ Total (A 11 Districts) $46,427,208. 100.0% JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly- o~ned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries and Wages -As previously reported, funds were not included in the budget for salary increases granted by the Boards pursuant to agreements with employee groups. However, because of payroll savings resulting from unfilled positions, the increases will be funded from current year payroll savings and expenses will be maintained well within the budget allocation. Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms, all of which will be within the budget allocation. Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products have been experienced. The Districts' have a cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange. Barring further increases, the budget allocation should suffice. Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is general I~ during the first quarter. It is becoming increasingly difficult to place this coverage be~ause of the reluctance of carriers to insure governmental agencies. Premiums have doubled in the past two years and we expect them to continue to rise. Budget allocation will be tight but should be adequate. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Our chlorine contract expired in December and although last year's chlorine unit costs increased 55%, the new unit price bid was down and expenditures this·year should therefor be less than anticipated. Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has precluded the necessity of using chemicals at the rate originally anticipated and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Additionally, we have been able to obtain improved quality chemicals at lower cost which has reduced the cost. Needless to say, there will be funds to carryover and apply to next year's budget requirements. Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge hauling and EDP services. Because of esca- lating costs and increasing volumes, the Boards were previously advised that a budget transfer for this account might be necessary. However, at this time it appears.as if the allocation will be sufficient. Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel's fees and audit fees paid through March 31st. Funds for work on revenue program will be carried over to next year. Printing and Publications -Reproduction policies have been changed to m1n1m1ze costs. However, con- tinuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with increased volume and "paper work" required by other agencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. As previously reported, a budget transfer for this account in the amount of $1 ,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is desired in the event it is necessary. Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations. Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this itern, however, absent major equipment failures, the current year allocation will not be exceeded. Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research "-"" Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first nine months of 1975-76. Because our auditors have now determined that certain cost associated with the evaluation of the JPL-ACTS project originally thought payable from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund should be paid from Joint Operating Funds, a budget transfer of $2,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is recom- mended. -2- Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has Increased substantially due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. Prices have stabilized during the past year after a rapid escalation when oil prices increased substantially, and thus consider- able carryover funds will be available for next year. Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere. Major item in this account is freight-in. During the year it was n~cessary to obtain a large shipment of chemicals from the Mid-west urgently needed for our solids handling operation. This material is generally available on the West Coast. Because of this, our freight expenditures for the current year will be higher than normal and a transfer of $4,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is, therefor, recommended. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expa~ding and improving the Districts• presently-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 41% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1975-76. During the first nine months, $12.5 million was expended on joint works t•eatment and disposal facilities expansion, primarily on the $32.5 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 1, approxi- mately 84% of which will be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each ·respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes -Approximately 61% of the budgeted property taxes for 1975-76 have been received through March 31st. Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant funds received during the period amount to $9.9 million, all on the 46 MGD Activated Sludge project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2% of 11 approved11 treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that payments will be limited to 80% of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The staff .has previously advised the Directors that our revenue program, even though it has been used as a 11 model 11 by the State, is unacceptable because it includes ad valorem taxes for operation, maintenance 'and capital recovery charges. The Boards are aware· that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, are vigorously supporting HR 9560 which would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem taxes, and result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts' taxpayers. Passage of the amendment appears somewhat in doubt at this time and it will therefor be necessary for the Boards to consider adoption of a program implementing "user charges". to assure receipt of the full grant allocation. Prohibition of ad valorem taxes will also have a substantial affect on long-range funding programs of the Districts. Connection Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became effective in Districts 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. District 5 revenues have dropped off considerably (only 23% of last year•s budget was received) and collections this year are running behind budget. District 7 fees have also decreased substantially over the past two years. District 2 and District 3 are about as projected; however, some cities are not remitting fees to the District on schedule and therefor receipts compared to budget may be misleading. Further, the budgets for these two Districts are approximately 54Z and 25% respectively, of the original annual forecast made by the financial consultant. Other Revenue -Except as footnooted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1975-76 budget for this item is 45% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts during the three quarters was $12,998,733. District 7's Facilities Revolving Fund budget reflected pro- jected receipts of approximately $1. 1 million from the Cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District pursuant to proposed amendments to the agreements with those agencies for the collection of connection fees. Because terms of the amendments have not yet been worked out, these funds have not been received, and it is therefor necessary to request that the authorized transfer of funds from the District 7 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACO) to the Facilities Revolving Fund be increased from $483,000 to $983,000 to be allocated from the ACO Fund's Facilities Improvements and Reserve Account. Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 million. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treat- ment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). -3- District Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of Individual Districts' general operating expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. District 7 should transfer $200 to their Memberships account to cover increased proportional share of AMSA and CASA~ dues. Last November the Boards adopted a policy with regard to uncollectable accounts. Pursuant to this new policy, it is necessary to make the transfers indicated to provide for bad debts authorized for write-off. JOIHT OPERATING FUND From the Account To the Account Amount Chemical Coagulants $7,000 Printing & Publications $1,000 Research & Monitoring 2,000 Other Expenses 4,000 --- $7,000 DISTRICT FUNDS Dist. No. Fund From the Account - Oper 3 Oper 3 ACO 7 Oper 7 ACO 11 ACO Unappropriated Reserve un·appropri ated Reserve Faci 1t i es Ext. Reserve Uhappropriated Reserve Faci 1 it i es Ext. Reserve Facilities Ext. Reserve J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance -4- To the Account Unco I lectab le Accounts Uncollectable Accounts Uncollectable Accounts Memberships Transfer to Faci 1. Rev. Uncollectable Accounts Uncollectable Accounts Amount $ soo 1 so - ~ so - 1 200 - $SOO, 100 -- $500,000 100 - $500,100 -- $ 100 '-"' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW 9 Months Ended 3-31-76 REMAINING BUDGET 1975-76 YEAR TO DATE J~UDGET Sil.LA RIES, 1111 GES & BENEFITS Sn la rie :.=; & \'18 ge s Employee Bcmefits .Sub-total Payroll Less: C.h[-1rgebacks to Dists & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll MATERIALS, 8liPPLIE8 & SERVICES Gasoline, 0-r.L & Fuel Insurance Office Expense Operating Expense Chlorine·~ Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services Professional Services Printing & Publicationc. Rents & Lenses--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Utilities Other Exper:ses Prior Years Expenses Total Material & Supplies TOTJ\L JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Less: Revenues NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE GALLONAGE Cl!ARGE'8 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 FLOW IN MILLION GALS 5, 381 MG 15,232 15,970 2,717 . i;714 ~,039 _3,389 48,442 MG 3,205,665 609,161 3,814,826 1,100,000 2, 714,826 60,000 . 45' 000 25,000 187,000 320,000 127,000 88,000 74,000 30,000 26,000 325,000 154,500 17,000 870,000 19,000 20,000 2,387,500 5,102,326 250,000 4,852,326 I 2,063,770 346,165 2,409,935 764,313 1,645,622 32,544 39,822 ~4,806 911124 53,139 52,401 56,402 25,164 22,514 12,949 220,995 110, 834 9,517 389,495 14,852 14,464 1,161,022 2,806,644 228,496 2,578,148 GALLONAGE CHARGE 286,384 810,667 849,945 144,602 144,443 161,740 180,367 2,578,148 1,141,895 262,996 1,404,891 335,687 1,069,204 27 ,456 . 5,178 10,194 95,876 266,861 74,599 31,598 48,836 7,486 13,051 104,005 43,666 7,483 480,505 4,148 5,536 1,226,478 2,295,682 21,504 2,274,178 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1975-76 Budget 1,215,590 1,412,000 37,000 335,457 1,985,000 4,434,738 93,888(1) 590,566 63,350(1) FKCILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS: Dyer Road Trunk Improv~ments · Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPl.fENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 4 l,'766,368 21,657 4,241,700 11,593 13,709 5,660,552 11,715,583 Year to Date 4,608,259 749,192 941,702 27,377 238,279 6,564,809 -0- 1,186,074 87,456 285,691 21,557 1,580,778 4,984,031 1975-7-6 Additions 1,186,074 1,186,074 (i) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves ~ Remaining Budp..;et ll66' 398 470,298 9,623 97,178 1, 985' o.oo 3,248,664 6,432 304,875 .4;1, 7 93 Balance 3-31-76 4 2' 952' 4·4 2 21, 657. 4,241,700 11,593 13,7ng 5,660,~ 12,901,657 ...,,, COUNTY SANITATION DI.STRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves o Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Jo'int Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 5,264,912 4,442,000 829,000 7,415,808 19,268,424 10,657,644 553,982(1) 1,523;173 217,700(1) FACILITIE& EXPANSION Balance 6-30-75 CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects 251,431 Yorba Linda Pump Station 324,094 Carbon Canyon Interceptors 1,600,596 Kraemer Interceptor 155,135 Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Intercepotr 1,410,689 Other Projects 48!!7~8 3,790,713 Share of Joint Works Expansion 5,554,102 COMPLETED PROPERTYJ PLANT & EQUIPft!ENT: Land and Property Rights 315,333 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 24,729,699 Treatment Facilities 1,186 Disposal Facilities · 33,172 General Plant and Administrative · Facilities 33,582 ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities 17,798,828 Total Property Plant & Equipment 52,256,615 ' . 13,915,782 3,198,730 2,961,053 662,984 3,415,234 24,153,783 4,020,067 3,729,445 510,566 808,633 129,652 - 9,198,363 14,955,420 197 5-7-6 Additions 2,799,448 444,493 3,971 474,096 35,379 262,680 4,020,067 3,729,445 7,749,512 · (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 2,066,182 1,480,947 166,016 4,000,574 15,248,357 6,928,199 43,416 714,540 88,048 Balance 3-31-76 3,050,879 768,587 1,604,567 629,231 1,446,068 311,448 7,810,780 9,283,547 315,333 24,729,699 1,186 33,172 33,582 17,798,828 . 60,006,127 " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW ~ Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 7,437,449 5,183,000 629,000 1.,073,000 18,258,550 8,841,250 776,546(1) 1,664,462 424,300(1) · FAC-ILIT-IES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Knott Interceptor Projects Imperial Relief Interceptor Westside Relief Interceptor Projects Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion C0~1PLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPftfENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 7,091,769 844,530 131,870 3,685 8,071,854 6,121,797 266", 131 23,833,572 15,036 28,419 52,006 19,618,078 58,006,893 15,857,6Lt5 4·,565,819 3,263,708 993,638 699,468 25,380,278 8,213,720 4,110,638 710,928 847,810 169,637 14,052,733 11,327,545 1975-7-6 Additions 6,664,576 376 1,488,273 60,495 8,213,720 _4'110' 638 ·12,324,358 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 2,871,630 1,919,292 (36lt ,638) 373,532 10,044,830 4,730,612 65,618 816,652 254,663 Balance 3-31-76 13,756,345 844,906 1,620,143- 64 ,180 16,285,574 10,232,435 266,131 23,833,572 15,036 28,419 52,f'/"\6 19,618,~ 70,331,251 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1,012,092 985,000 65,000 219,497 1,228,798 2,409,119 28,965(1) 297,824 250,920(1) FAGILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications NIWA Planning . . Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 27,981 2,000 1,512 760 32,253 1,232,177 6,231 3,096,885 7,347 7,115 8,946 3,9118,667 8,339,621 2,017,349 641,243 656,909 67,45b 124,058 3,507,009 11,807 827,377 26,563 144,244 129,476 1,139,467 2,367,542 197 5-7·6 Additions .2' 138 410 9,259 11,807 827,377 370,849 328,091 (2,450) 95,439 1,216,991 1,581,742 2,402 153,580 121,, 444 Balance 3-31-76 30,119 2,000 1,922 10,019 44,060 2,059,554 6,231 3,096,885 7,347 7,115 8,946 3' 9!18 '6 6 7 ·839,184 .. ·9,178,805 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW ~ Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses· District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 632,004 873,000 5,000 133,152 2,213,295 ·. 386,933 582,486 5,698 116,102 3,304,514 571,000 4,631 2,695,137 733,641 35,546(1) 32,673 302,907 144,082 61,340(1) 21,431 ------ 936,458 2,368,056 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COfifPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQVIP~IENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment. Balance 6-30-75 7,405 90 274 7,769 1,092,580 562 618,344 2,653 7,394 16,237 3,501,311 5,246,850 197 5-7-6 Additions 1,264 21~ 3,343 4,631 733,641 738,272 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 245,071 290,514 (698) 17,050 566,369 1,961,496 2,873 158,825 39,909 Balance 3-31-76 8,669 114 3,617 12,400 1,826,221 562 618,344 2,653 7,394 ·5' 985) 122 .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW : Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 2,005,595 1,225,000 156,ooo 1,335,495 3,~56,841 4,921,573 694,061(1) 340,516 245,275(1) FACILITIE& EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Tustin-Orange Trunk Prqjects Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities Oeneral Plant and Administrative Facilities ~~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment. Balance 6-30-75 569,167 2,395 571,562 1,531,845 230,165 16,003,785 10,782 12,440 4,908,993 23,269,572 5,106,557 1,208,184 816,671 168,656 271,732 7,571,800 729,020 1,028,597 476,084 161,319 111,372 2,506,392 5,065,408 197 5-7-6 Additions 729,020 729,020 1,028,597 797,411 408,329 (12,656) 1,063,763 2,627,821 3,892,976 217,977 179,197 133,903 Balance 3-31-76 1,298,187 2,395 1,300,582 2,560,442 230,165 16,003,785 10,782 12,440 4,908,993 1,757;617 ·25,027,189 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 19'/6 BUDGET REVIEW .. • . Remaini~ 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue .& Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1,217,106 1,051,000 5,000 L118, 523 2,741,000 3,140,553 94,700(1) 362,878 212,520(1) FACILITIE& EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Slater Ave. Pump Station Wet Well Slater Ave. Pump Station Modifications Master Plan Report Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROFERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities .General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipmen~ Balance 6-30-75 52,030 7,698 1,302 i,314,073 18,711 3,797,881 3,053 19,936 l~ '211, 117 9,425,801 4,328,622 ·, 741,794 700,571 16,573 216,046 6,003,606 19,488 882,369 85,938 179,941 72,381 1,240,117 4,763,489 197 5-7-6 Additions 19,467 21 19,488 882,369 475,312 350,429 (11,573) 202,477 2,721,512 2,258,184 8,762 182,937 140,139 Balance 3-31-76 52,030 27,165 1,323 80,518 2,196,442 18,711 3,797,881 3,053 19,936 4 '211, •. ,,,,,) 901,857 . 10,327,658 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves J CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS MAY 31,, 1976 i' l .. ENGINEERIN G DEPART.1-fE NT ·~ CotJCRFTC Fl N I SH VJOl::k'.'.1 ('AULKll\JG I~ f-IY\P 9 /liPt.CTI- R ·co C Ros~ <:DLL.E<'.itOkJ G ys rt: M ~P: 1 tJG-.~,.,. / I\) ST!'.\'-L E'..0. .S CL(f'v\ co LLE'C.TDR$ J ".lST A. L..l....C-..D 2 4 6 8 10 IZ 14 8 r ' I D!GE'$1E~f I 5 4 J 2 I AERATION 8A$1N1 1~ PUf'Y\f/S Ar.J D 1~11'.--'11 -pJG tdSTi-\l..LED '-\Gr 110 THE. i31": I . .... \ 'P s1ATIOIJ r(_r.TuPN sCu'C6:-PUI'< .. I 3 s 7 9 II 13 839 W.A~TE ~LUD6E Tfl/C.J(ENEl?S M ECH A.NIS /A DRIV ES. '· I NS.l'<r::... Ll-:CP. C O N i r.:::o L ROOM P\.l ,4\ P' .s 1-lf'JD t+E:".AI EXcHMJG~J:: . .. 1£t0NDARY Cl.AR/FIERS poo£. p...tJD r;.1 ,:11\.. P/:\.1'.lt:.LS. 1 1'>~'Tf>..LLf'1J D POWEi? 8UILD/NG . 50 ___ MG D __ ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT CONTRACT NO. P1 -~16 .• C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1 -t6 SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STAR TI NG DATE: June 27, 1974 $29,876,000.00 $25,779,272.77 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14' 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 1977 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Contract is for the construction of Activated SZudge secondary fa•eatment facilities at Plant No. 1. The new facilities UJi ii aid the Districts in meeting. rrandated State and Federa Z ocean discharge requirements. urith PZant No. 2 effluent at the outfall booster station, improving the overall quality of water pwrrped through the outfall system into the ocean. Significant struatures included in the contract are the Blower Building, Aeration Baoins, Second- ary CZarifiers, wo Digestern, Waste Sludge 'Ihic~­ eners and the Power Building. When completed, the secondary treatment system llriZZ process the 50 mgd of wastet.Jater flowing through Plant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then bl.end . ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work in the blower building has been minimal. The exterior sliding doors have been installed and the interior walk thru door jambs are being set. Work on the Aeration Basins has· consisted primarily of concrete finish work including caulking. The sludge collection system is being installed in the Secondary Clarifiers. Handrailing continues to be installed. Pumps are being placed in the Return Sludge Pump Station. Interior door frames and handrail have been installed in the Waste Sludge Thickeners. Work in the Digester area consists of piping installa- tion in the control building and tunnels. <:.... ~ _, -a t r l> 0 -I en r-.. ~ I 0 I () . .. fTl I CJ) I (J) -0 I r :t> z -i. c_ 0 OJ z 10 -a :E I 0 ~ (J1 ----~ •fil ] . ~: ; ' CONTRACT PW~ 045 .... JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Oct. 1, 1975 ... ... x Contract is for construction of a one million gaZ- Zon per dt;.y pilot wastewater treatment plant at Wastewater Treatment Plant !lo. 2. The pl.ant ziYil.l use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACTS) dBveloped by the Natwnal Aeronautics and Space.Agency's Jet Propulsion Labora.tory. This treatment method tJas perfected in its experimental 6ta;_7ea with a mobile research unit opero.ted by JPL personnel at the Distxj,.cts' Wastewate2• Treatment Plant No. 1 in Fountain VaUey during 1974-75. The system uses sludge removed from the wastewater to produce activated Ca:I'bon t'hr.ough a pyrolysis reactor. The activated caroon is then reintro- duced into the wastewater stream in a secondary stage for additional rerova.l of poliutantso Only .. pari-iaZZy used after the second stage, the aativa- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan .. 28, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 ted carbpn Cznd secondary sludge slurry is fed into the incoming wastewater stream to increase system efficiency. The mobile experimental unit used to refine this system from laboratory bench experiments ?Ja.s batch operated with mechanical handling of rra:terial from stage to stage. The pilot plant wUi be a contin- uousZy rwz, automated system. As a prime objective .of the ACTS, it could solve an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this rraterial becomes more plentiful with i.-rrproved wasteiJater treatment and fr.creased flows. In ad- dition, the effZuent from this treatment system is expected. to meet the discharge requirements of the Districts' N.P.D.E.S. permito ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor completed final billing with exception of telephone, reproducing machine and office time fo~ last week of May. District staff working with equipment suppliers on correcting problems associ~ted with several pieces of equipment. X!fhis contract is a design and conBtruct contract whereby the contractor is paid $50, 000. 00 plus the actual cos'ts for ail labor and matel"':.als. • I I ' TRINIDAD Si. ~ O\S1. 2 ~ co?lll'LE'J$ TO BE coNSTRUC'l'ED -1iS'-- I I t: <ti' i:. ~! JI ct::9 a.I . coNlRACl No.2-14-3: GRO\f t:: ST. - """' v .. ~-rusrlt~ ~ ',~~'IE.· CONTRACT 2 -:-14 -3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER ~ SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 19 75 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $3, 814, 462. 00 PAID TO DATE: $930,384.00 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 0 Calendar Days Nov. 12, 1977 Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125 mi.le reinforced concrete pipe trunk line sewer a- 1.ong La. Palma Ave. from Grove St. to Imperial Hwy. in Anaheim. section of 33" diamete;. vitrified clay pipe is designed to receive flows from the Sou.th R-1:ver Trunk, serving Santa. Ana Canyon. With the comple- tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa /'.r.a Can- yon pwnping station can be abandoned. The first one-third of the project uses 51" diam- eter pipe, the bal.a.nce is 48". Atso included in the contract is a lateml con- nectol" line to the Santa Ana River Interceptor system from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rd. a- tong Imperial HUJy. to La Palma Ave. This 2750' T11is section of the interceptor system is designed to handle up to 3 5 mil lion gal Zons flow per da.y. Included in this figure is 30 MGD alloi..xmce for accepting future high brine wastev.:ia.ter flows f-::>om San Bernardino an.d Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work is progressing very well on this job with the cont~actor laying an average 180 feet of pipe per day. The pipe heading has just passed La Palma Avenue and Coronado Avenue. Back-end cleanup on this job is being handled very well, and the city of Anaheim is pleased w~th the progress and traffic handling measures. The contractor la~d 2,727 feet of pipe during the month. ' ~ . S4\\ ~""~b!c.Wis """ ~i,. ~~~ • !;. 6-•~"· r1"'.) \ t 0 ,~, "Jt ~ c r ()~ \ ~a-,.........__._~,,."'="'-'"~,El ~ C'>'C' l ~\""~"<'ACS I '"tl . ~t,\\ . ....._,__ lft -' 1 ' . '~. ~\.V\ Q.~~114\,,...\~"n ~w·s.i ~f( '" ~u "~ ~ ~ .. , .. DIST. 2 ~COMPLETE ---...,, TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 2 -14 ~ 4 "'-"' .. PRtV.4\TE RC. WE.1 R CANYON Ro . CONTRACT 2-14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH S Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor ST AR TI NG DATE : 0 ct . 15 , 19 7 5 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4, 240, 957. 00 PAID TO DATE: $3, 475, 544. 00 Controct ia for construction of a 5.1 mile long section of re·tnforcecI concrete pipe trunk line sewer from Imperial-l:.'wy. a Long La Palma Aveo in. hu:heim, traversing the ne-i.J Yorba Regional Park to Heir Canycn Rd. The 'I'ight-of-way then crosses the Santa Ana River at · wo places as it· traverses. county territor'lJ through Santa Ana VaZZey Irriga- tion Co. and. Bryant Ranch properties to Gypsum Rd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7, 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMP LET I ON DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7 Depending or: design criteria, various sections of this Zine use 42, 45 and 51 inch diameter pipe. This section L-'>iz:l handle flows up to 32 million gall-or.a per dayo Included in this figure is 30 J.1GD al Zowanoe for accepting future high brine wastewater flows from San Bernardino and Riveroide Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH The contractor is making good progress on ·this contract - in spite of problems encountered with soil conditions not indicated on the soi~s report. He laid 3,081 feet of pipe during May and has completed pipe laying for all but the two river crossings on the north end of the job. Excessive water caused by soil conditions has necessitated laying a three to four foot thick rock bed under the pipe joints as they are installed, vs. a normal one foot layer. This condition exists primarily from the upper river crossing to the north end of the job. The contractor will submit a claim for extra work due to these conditions. The concrete foundation pad for encasing the pipe under the upper river crossing is complete. Pipe will be installed at this cros9ing during the first week in June, encased, covered over, and the river bed returned to its normal path so excavation can begin under the diversion channel. Simultaneously, the contractor will begin trenching operations at the southern terminus of the job at Imperial Highway and La Palma Avenue during the first week in June. ·. ·oti NOANVJ VNV \J.LNVS S" -17l-l ·oN l)\f(flNO) G ~lSJO ""tr~~~ ~~-\--""JI 'O~')f. '"O . "o+ .,-."'i--"'"':) CONTRACT 2-i4-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER REACHES 6, 7 & 8 S. S. Zarubica; Contractor STARTING DATE: Nov. 27' 1975 PRIGINAL CONTRACT: $2, 096, 676 · 15 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, 1976 . PAID TO DATE: $667, 694. 45 Contract is for the construction of .a 2. 4 mi le long se~tion of reinforced concrete pipe Zin& sew- er. The line goes through the Santa Ar.a Canyon from where Contract No. 2-14-4 ends in about the center of the Bryant Rench property, along the 210ute of the Santa Ana River and through tr~ northern portion of the Green River Golf Course to the County Line. The Une terminates in a cor.t;ro 7, and metering structure designed to measure flows from the upper basin counties. The line consists of 45, 42, and 39-inch diC1J11eter sections of pipe. The diafr.eters cJiange in rela- tion to design requirerr.ents. This cectior. of the Santa Ana River Intel'ceptor system wilt har:.dle flows of appY'oximtely 32 mill.ion gc.lfons per day. Included in this figUPe is 30 /..'GD aUowance foz• accepting futu:l'e high brir.e wastewater flo~s frcm San BerriCIT'dino and Riverside Counties. .· ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH The contractor has cleared brush and trees fro~ the right- of-way from the northern most river crossing to the southern terminus of the job and graded an access road for most -of this distance. 250 feet of pipe were raid during May. Structural construction is complete on the mete.ring structu;re, and cleanup work is. proceeding very well. Planning continues with management of the Green River Golf Course for restoration of a tee in the pipe laying ·right-of-way that was .destroy.ed during trenching operations and landscaping .and grading along the golf course north boundary. \ An unspecified problem continues to delay installation of electrical service to our contractor on the west side of the ·upstream river crossing for powering dewatering pumps at that location. The contractor has moved downstream to a point opposite the north end of Featherly Regional Park and is dewatering there, using portable generat6rs, in preparation for trenching operations. Trenching should begin during the first week in June. Two power poles in the righ-of-way are scheduled to be moved by Edison Company during the first week in June. These poles are within a short distance of where the ~ontractor has chosen to begin trenching. 'Ot\1fl CONTRACT No. 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Hcntk Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146. 00 PAID TO DATE: $693, 462. 99 Contract is· for t}1e construction of a reinforced concrriete structure to house wet we Us and pwr.ps for t1unsferring tribidar:J uxi.stewater through a force m:iin line into· the Santa Ana River, Carbon CCI/'11.JOn Inte11 ceptor-re Zief Trunk Line system for conveyance to Wastewate~ ReclaJnation Plant Noo 1 in Fozmtain Valley. 'lhis 1,izi assist in relieving the presently congested Newhope-Plaeentia T1"Unk Line and wiU se2-.ve proposed Zari.d use development of the tributary a:l'ea to the year 2010. ~1-.e pwnp station structure is located at the in- tersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Assooia:ted Road in Ful:lerton. It is being constructed on CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1976 81 Calendar Days Dec. 10, 1976 ?Jhat was originally UniversitzJ of California, Ful- terton property at the nortlzc11 n perimeter of the campus. Special arrangements were TTYJ.de zvith the University for use of the prope11 ty. The ahove-growi.d portion of the :Jt;ru.cture LYi iz be a lOUJ profile slab 85' x 109', 2 feet above ground. Th.e deepest portion of the structure will be :55 feet under the ground. The DilJtrict has agreed to construct a slump-stone fence a~ound the structure and landscape the area in u.ccordc:nce mth futu1~e corr.patibZe use by the Vrdversity. The Universib:J plans to construct an arboretwn in the Urrmediate area at some future date. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Construction and equipment installation is complete. Final testing is underway. CI3.1.Jf'Jl,T~OJ 3a 0.1 • -_,. _ _. Z 91.SIO ~T\~~ ----------~~ ~~ '. CONTRACT 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976, ORIGINAL CONTRACT: ,.$660, 287. 98 PAID TO DATE: $530,907.68 Contract is for construction of a 1. 4 mile seUJer force main of 30-in.ch ductile ir.:i12 pipe. This line will ca.rry sewage pwnped from the Yorba Linda Pwr!p Station at Yo1.,ba Linda Boulevard an.d Associ- ated Road in Fullerton to a reach of the Santa Ana River Trunk line system at Palm Drive and Kroemer· EouZevard in Placentia. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Da.ys PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 This force rrain ar.d the pur.:p station are designed to relieve the presently corgested Na.ihcpe-PL.c.cen- tia Trunk Line. It will serve proposed land u.sq. development of the tributary area t.o the year 2010. The force main is desigr.ed to accept up to 1.'i miZ- Zion gaZlor.s per day flows. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH We reported last month that a pit had been left open at the intersection of Placentia Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard for access to the pipe tunneled under Placentia and grouting operations around that pipe. The contractor did not wish to perform air tests and grouting of the tunnel on the completed portion of the pipe, allowing closing the pit, until the enti~e line was completed. Work has been shut down on the job at the order of the Supervising ~ngineer· until the coritractor complies with orders to perform the requested air testing, and close the pit, which interferes with the business of a gas station on that corner. Tunneling under the freeway was allowed tc continue and is now complete. Pipe is being installed. The portion of the line that came in conflict with an 86-inch storm drafn in ··sapphire Road discovered to be inaccurately ·located on the job plans has been redesigned and will be constructed by the contractor at an added cost to the District of $11,761.80. Basically, this will require lowering about two feet to clear the storm drain over a 600 foot portion of the job. JI LINCM4 AVF. IL ~ <;:\~o-\ Q~A \~s~\\t\~\C\tl U""~ W°'' RANGE ~,.Sr_.,_.....----· a,, 'r1 4:a~ ~ ~""t\~ ~°'ve--\-~~ ~ c.."--~ ~-<b\\ \~M V\ ovT"' a.~ ~ \ \ ~" • DIST. 3 --wa .. COMPLETE CllY OF l\:11 BUENA ~ ~I I PARK ~ ~ CERRITOS CITY ~TELLA ..---TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 O~L MIJllT£ ... 1~ '§ i.1 It~ CITY OP ANAJ-IEIM ROAD AVE. 4. AVE. i::==----- i N ~ ~ ll ._ STARTING DATE: CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G• Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor March 6, 1975 t CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: "$3, 876·, 870. 00 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PAID TO DATE: $3,854,6~3.50 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6 ;· 19 76 Contract is for instaZ.lation of a Reinforced Con- crete Pipe (R.C.P.) sewer Z.ine from a point 1200 feet south of Kate Z.Za Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Az>enue to LincoZ.n Avenue in Anaheim, a distance of 2. 3 mile.'3. Pipe diame- t.ers are 72 11 for the first 3, 900 feet, 53" for 6, 900 feet and 66" for the remainiri.g 1200 feet of the project. F'lows from this reach will drain in- tc> Contract 3-20-1 to the south. congested MiUer-HoZ.der Trunk Sewer by intercep- ting ['lows fPom the rr.orthLJest portion of District 3. The southerly te1'17i7~nus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and El.tis Avenue i.n Fpu.ntain ValZey. It wiZZ eventualiy extend to Imperial, Avenue in la Habra. This portion of the PeZief system is designed to handle a fZow of 68 milZion gallons per day and LJi.ZZ. serve the proposed deveZoped Zand use plan in the tributa:ry area to the year 2010. This project is a portion of the Y..nott Interceptor relief system designed to Pelieve the presently . . :· .. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Tunneling under Lincoln Avenue is c~mpleted and pipe is in. Grouting o.pera tions are underway. The contractor began excavation for the last 150 feet of pipe.north of Lincoln Avenue the first week in June. The paving subcontractor continues to repair bad paving ~nstallation in the area from Ball Road north to Lincoln Avenue. First course paving is in in this area. The City of Anaheim is conducting TV checks of an 8-inch sewer line that was replaced in parallel with installation of the larger pipe. It appears there are cracks, broken joints and settling in portions of the line between Ball Road arid Lincoln Avenue. This will have to be repaired before final paving is installed ~n that area . . · ' DIST. 3 ~~ COMPLETE 1m1BB1-r&ill TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-21-2 CRESC.ENT II AVE. ==================.='..; L INC o L N '.I, AVE • -lllll!!l lliCDI ... -.. -llim ~ .... __ _ OR.ANG£ 1- LU llJ er l- U) > a 0 0 AVE. 8.~LL :?: RD. ---=-------' ,.~-k. . . . ,. ., ,.·!('ARBON CR EEK . ~i .,:J'"/v-;y RA .. .__,~ ... ' -~ ·. ·-C HANNE.L .Li\1~ ,. " ..... I MARION JG_ . ""--c_£_R_A._1_T_o_s _ ____, I Av E. EXERCISE it TRACK~---,1r-~STA8LES \ ... 111 ___ I ---I S.P,R.R. _ JJ ltl UIJ! 1I!11111i!1 l ! 1l11lIi111111: l: 1l1111111 l Ii 1 D 1 ARROWHEAD g·i MFG. CO. U I ____ -:J .l(AT£LLA AVE. CONTRACT 3-21-2 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29 B & P Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: .$1,177,745.00 PAID TO DATE: $122,214.50 Contract is for construction of a 2. 75 mile sec- t-ion of vitrified clay pipe trzmk line sewer t.izmugh the City of Ci.Jpress from Y.ateUa Avenue in Los Alamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De- pending on design critie:tia, t71e pipe line is in various sizes from 15 11 to 30 11 in dicunete1~. This secUon of Zine tJiZl complete the rraster- planned I·/estside Relief Interceptor sewer that be- gins at the Seal Beach BZvd. Pumping Station at CONTRACT COMP LET I ON DATE: Dec. 24, 19 76 Tl ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24, 1976 SeaZ Beach Blvd. and Tlestmir.ster Ave. This system is designed to relieve the Los Alamitos Subt1•unk, which at present functions as the main sewer for the wes tside basin. For the most pca.'t, this Zine is currently [lO..Jing at or near peak capacity. This section is designed to handle fZoLJs up to 6. 32 million gaUons per day and wiZZ sez>Ve ·pro- posed Zand use plans in the tributary to the year 2010. . ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH I Th~ contractor broke ground and lai~ 1,003 feet of pipe during May. The pipe heading is now in the vicinity of Myra Avenue. A jacking pit h~s been .excavated, and the contractor is tunneling under the Carbon Creek Flood Control Channel just north of Myra. The contractor experienced some difficulty in meeting backfill soil composition and compaction specifications in the early stages of the job. An acceptable blending of sand and native soil was worked out and all material placed in the trench meets specification ·requirements. _ ___..ll WALNU T II AVE . IL ' DIS T. 7 =-COMPLETE CH APMA N .. ..: <I) Q')' w ' -~I c:( .., --e:lll!l:ill TO BE CONSTRUCTED CO N1.RA CT N O. 7 -6 -8 t 8 4: ;z J.. ~ ...., "' .-: ~a rJ) > S T. -·~ ~ SPRING . "'tti!P!f:._;\!:""-""l!llRl~.'=-~t'Cl:-'Cl !ft--'I~[v 1Nt: I~ '[ 101 j cswrER ST ... ~ D I· ll cf.'ARLS T . 1 ~ 1s00!AvE. I[ DD ~\/\IA~\.l \NIOTON ~PiAIL..0 I n ..--, l'---i. lw f D ,, 4:: t ~ ~~ ~.·en 'fJ W ~ 4: ::r: ...J <L < uJ ~ ~ ~A I R~AVEN AYE . .., CONTRACT 7-:6-8 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWERJ PORTION OF REACH 12J REACH 131 AND PORTION OF REACH 14 Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $512,892.00 PAID TO DATE: $520, 453. 00 Ccmtract is for constructing a 1. ?8 mile secti.on of trunk lir.e sewer of 21 and 27 inch diair.eter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in the Lerrr:m Heights area of Orange. !l'he line be~ns in the vicinity of Fairhaven Ave- nue and Esplar.ade Street, goes north on Esplar.ade Street to Spring Street and east on Spring Street to Santiago Boulevc.Pd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 \ This project ia the final portion of the mastei-- pZc::nned Tustin-Orange Trunk Li~e Relief System. The system provides dra.iriage for the central and northern portions of District No. 7. This section is designed to handle fler.Js up to 6.?2 million gallons per day and uiZZ serve pro- posed land use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Job complete Project to be recommended for acceptance at the July Board. • .3/\V' :r: N\IWdVH') -----(Tl =;a:;~;~----~ (f) l> z -I a~ 10 · i.s ·3/\'V (T1 (/) (}') ... 9N\BdS .LON1VM ·3/\'r/ QN09 6-9-L ·oN 18\tt:JlN08 ---- Pi L ·1s10 .. .' CONTRACT 7-6-9 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16 Sully-~liller Contracting Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: COtffRACT COMP LET I ON DATE: Oct. 26, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Apr. 29, 1976 $295,826.40 $36,750.00 Tl ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 26, 1976 This contract is the last reach of the nuster- planned Tus tin-Oro.n.ge Trunk Sewer to be const:rtu:!- ted by the District. It consists of a 1. 5 mile section of vitPified clay pipe line va.rying f'l'Om · 18 to 21 inches in diameter. This portion of the trunk sewer lJJi ZZ connect into an existing 18" sewera "line naJ ooned by the City of Orange. The upstr·e:im system feeding to this point is scheduled to be purcr1<1sed by the Distnct at a later date. .. - Construction wiZ'l begin at Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street in Ora.Fzge and go north to Santiago Canyon Road, where the projeat ends. The Zine traverses portions of the City of Grange and un- incorporated County area a"long its route. Designed f'low for this portion of the trunk 'Line system is 4.65 MGD, and will serve the _proposed developed Zand use plan in the tributary area to the year 201 O. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH The contractor broke ground during the in May. He has laid 350 feet of pipe. progressing very well on this job with operations following pipe installation closely. · last wee}\ Work ·is backfilling very SUMMARY TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During May DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During May TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER CONTRACT $31,311,934 26,720,851 1,394,613 $17,402,719 10,330,817 1,348,022 $31,311,943 $17,402,719 $48,714,662 ·r 'W'd Q£!L -9L61 '6 3Nnr SlNJWnJoa 9Nil~OddnS CTN~ SNOilnlOS3~ WARRANT NO, 29629 29630 ""9631 . ~9632 29633 29634 29635 29636 29637 29368 29639 29640 29641 29642 29643 29644 29645 29646 29647 29648 29649 29650 29651 29652 29653 29654 29655 29656 29657 29658 29659 29660 29661 29662 29663 29664 29665 29666 29667 29668 29669 29670 29671 29672 29673 29674 29675 29676 29677 29678 29679 ~9680 ~9681 29682 29683 "A-1" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS . ·1N FAVOR OF Admiral Corporation, Sampling Equipment Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings All Bearing Service, Inc., Pipe Supplies & Bushings American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals V. B. Anderson, Small Tools Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Parts Banning Battery Company, Batteries Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts C & R Reconditioning Company, Engine Repair C S Company, Engine Parts Cal-State Seal Company, Seals Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Cam Auto Parts, Truck Parts Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil Removal Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials Compressor Service, Compressor Parts Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair Leelon Cory, Employee Mileage Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Clarence S. Cummings, Employee Mileage. N. A. D'Arcy Company, Equipment Parts John M. Deck, Equipment Parts Derby's Topsoil, Paving Materials Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage Envirotech-Sparling Division, Strip Charts Essick Machinery Co., Compressor Parts Fibre-Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Protective Coatings Fischer &'Porter Company, Strip Charts City of Fountain Valley, Water Edward R. Francis, E-079 Inspection Travel Expense Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer General Telephone Company Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage Graybar Electric Company, Electric Supplies Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease Hightower Metal Products, Hardware Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope.& Valves Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental IDS Corporation, Office Supplies Irvine Ranch Water District, Water Karlee Company, Maintenance Supplies King Bearing, Inc., Hardware & Bearings Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware L. A. Liquid Handling Systems, Pump LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service Judy Lee, Employee MilcagQ· Lube Lift Equipment, Oil Tanks AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 392.20 121. so 178.90 4,783.59 169.60 31.80 401.08 368.35 1,575.67 230.00 238.50 147.13 45.71 12.21 1,852.18 42.86 236.27 333.67 818.54 1,548.55 909.88 8.25 22.84 6.00 16.35 34.46 43.46 318.00 15.90 63.66 35.14 57. 72 163.40 55.32 40.00 200.40 360.40 77.40 54.90 509.65 105.00 743.51 26.50 802.21 37.10 291.92 1. 75 542. 72 299.60 32.44 157.94 67.25 1,110.01 17.85 585.92 "A-1" WARRANT NO. 29684 29685 29686. 29687 29688 29689 29690 29691 29692 29693 29694 29695 29696 29697 29698 29699 29700 29701 29702 29703 29704 29705 29706 . 29707 29708 29709 29710 29711 29712 29713 29714 29715 29716 29717 29718 29719 29720 29721 29722 29723 29724 29725 29726 29727 ·29728 29729 29730 29731 "A-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PA!D MAY 11, 1976 IN FAVOR OF McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts McGraw-Hill Publications Co., Technical Manuals McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair Mine Safety Appliances Co., Testing Supplies Moltronics Division, Electric Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers National Chcmscarch, Lubricant & Cleaner City of Newport Beach, Water Nolex Corporation, Printing Supplies Nu-Day Tools, Tools Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Telephone Company Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Quality Building Supply, Building Materials Quik Spray, I.nc., Equipment Parts Regents of University of California, 208 Planning Seminar The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Rewes-Schock, Contractor 11-lR-l Ryan Herco, Pipe Supplies & Fabricating Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern California Edison Company Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Concrete Materials, Concrete Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil & Gasoline Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies The Suppliers, Tools Thompson·Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies & Equipment Parts Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts & Truck Repair J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Equipment Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Al Ursic, Employee Mileage Valvate Associates, Valve Parts Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Varec, Inc., Digester Parts & Freight Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. S., Odor Consultant Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 177.51 20.62 270.1'1 35. u-_, 63.96 172. 94 2,470.96 620.10 5.81 502.14 30.62 38.16 318.42 232.83 220.15 231.47 35.00 76.86 7,802.77 412.87 18.55 42.56 42.81 688.33 44.34 205.00 395.00 990.35 183.59 167.80 5,652.73 53.43 1,089.35 957.81 79.24 388.91 32.54 6.28 784.94 10.65 35.51 2,122.36 460.57 217.51 34.26 217.60 2,554.00 20.25 $ 52,577.76 "A-2" WARRANT NO. 29613 29614 ~ 29615 29616 29617 29618 29619 29620 29621 29622 29623 29624 29625 29626 29627 29628 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 . CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Belmont Engineering, Retention, PW~045 John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, JPL ACTS & Fae. Plan Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-079 Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E & G Contractors, Retention, PW-046 Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services, P2-8-8 J. Putnam Benck, Contractor, PW-045 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management, Pl-16 LBWS, Inc., Hydraulic Press & Tools LFE Corporation, Retention, PW-045 Olympic Signs, JPL Signs Southland Helicopter, Aerial Photos Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2 TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 8,069.83 5,182.65 17.58 317,318.29 1,284.50 586.18 420.00 492 .11 171, 034. 73 22,887.36 3,462.95 10,159.00 215.18 160.00 25.00 4,725.00 $ 546,040.36 $ 598,618.12 "A-3" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND \\'ARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF '29594 29595 29596 29597 29598 29599 29600 29601 29602 29603 29604 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Kasler Corp., & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3A Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14, 2-15, 2-16-2 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc & N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor 3-20-2 & 3-21-1 DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29605 Simpson-Steppat, Civil Engineering Service Back Bay Trunk Sewer DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29612 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19 "B II AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 159,048.00 226,320.Sl 257.59 6,033.60 1,004,164.95 1,297.44 40,334.62 277,342.38 $ 1,714,799.09 $ 1,077.00 568.92 187,557.36 $ 189,203.28 $ 6,800.00 $ 270.00 "B II INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 29606 State of California, Annexation 46 Processing Fee 29607 29608 29609 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8, 7-6-9 Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor 7-6-8 Cou~ty of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6-8 DISTRICT NO. 11 . ·oPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29610 State of California, Annexation 17 Processing Fee ACCUMULATED CAPITAL-.OUTLAY FUND·l~ARR°ANTS IN FAVOR OF 29611 Clifford L. Thorr.pson Construction Company, Contractcr 11-4R II C" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ AMOUNT 180.00 1,940.00 247,565.70 26.08 $ 249' 531. 78 $ 24 9 , 711. 7 8 $ 85.00 634.98 $ 719.98 II c II WARRANT NO. 29746 29747 29748 29749 29750 29751 29752 29753 29754 29755 29756 29757 29758 29759 29760 29761 29762 29763 29764 29765 29766 29767 29768 29769 29771 29772 29773 29774 29775 29776 29777 29778 29779 29780 29781 29782 29783 29784 29785 29786 29787 29788 29789 29790 29791 29792 29793 29794 29795 29796 29797 29799 "D-1" .J U l N · 1-IJ l ::> · 1 F. 1 l, 1 ~ l, L J\ .t l'1 ;:;> Y J\ l U M J\ 1 L. ~ , J. ~ I u JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Metal Services Corp., Control Panels All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Seals & Bushings Aljac Supply Company, Tools American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals Ameren Corrosion Control Di vision, Clear,er City of fu1aheim, Power AMSA, Conference Registration Bank of America, Coupon Collection Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Parts Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Furniture Belt Repair & Installation, Conveyor Repair Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc., Pre-employment Exams Building News, Inc., Safety & Technical Manuals Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Art Carr Transmission, Truck Repair Catco, Inc., JPL Chemicals College Book Company, Technical Manuals Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Crown Controls, Inc., Controls Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplies Daily Industrial Tools, Tools Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Electric Switches, Inc., Electric Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Fischer & Porter Company, Pump Parts Compressor Products Division, Compressor Parts & Repair Frederick Pump & Engineering, Pump Parts General Telephone Company Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal George T. Hall Company, Controls Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Valve Repair City of Huntington Beach, Pennit Fee ILG Industries, Duct Fan Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies L A Truck Equipment, Truck Parts LBWS, Inc., Tools, Welding Supplies & Hardware L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, Cleaner National Lumber Supply, Tools & Hardware City of Newport Beach, Water Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies & Equipment Rental AGENDA ITEM tfl -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 383. 47~"4" 280.78 74.73 4' 931. 34 59 . .10 133.04 125.00 16.80 269.09 296.22 325.15 2,868.60 44.SS 78.00 182.17 79.55 94.26 201. so 1,071.50 31.54 962.83 3,097.10 525.13 234.15 80.00 25.18 170.00 45.58 3,000.00 63.07 495.16 83.06 3,002.30 1,107.00 406.77 40.67 495.74 187.93 390.00 624.10 92.33 1,171.30 700.99 1,209.49 48.19 1,382.13 373.12 72. 04 407 .14 503 ·"'-" 197.54 "D-1" WARRANT.NO. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976 IN FAVOR OF 29800 29801 29802 ~9803 29804 29805 29806 29807 29808 29809 29810 29811 29812 29813 29814 29815 29816 29817 29818 29819 29820· 29821 29822 29823 29824 29825 29826 29827 29828 29829 29830 29831 29832 29833 29834 29835 29836 29837 "D-2" Pacific Telephone Company Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Supplies Robbins & Myers, Pwnp Parts Rockwell International, Calculator Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co. , Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools Southern California Edison Compa.ny South Orange Supply, Hardware Speede Speedometer, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil The Suppliers, Tools & Hardware T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Retirement System Study Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Company of Califon1ia, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Permit Printing United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement Utilities Supply Company, Tools Valley Towing, Truck Towing Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage Water Pollution Control Federation, Technical Manuals Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Westron Corporation, Electric Supplies Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John M. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, employee Mileage Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Company, Reproduction Supplies County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 475.70 220.48 64.00 136.42 395.37 28.51 455.22 303.30 301. 94 48.65 13,206.63 53.69 6.37 1,281.62 153.59 32.12 66.42 42.43 3,000.00 53.00 495.35 19.27 20.02 288.08 33.00 607.57 30.00 36.30 198.51 233.30 334.08 2,046.00 22.50 35.46 3,422.94 1,310.74 99.87 262.89 $ 62,608.90 "D-2" WARRANT NO. 29739 29740 29741 29742 29743 29744 29745 29837 "D-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS TN FAVOR OF Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc., Tools J. Putnam Henck, Contractor PW-045 Material Handling Supply, Shelving P ~ S Repair Service, Contractor E-079A Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent Siemag Systems, Inc., Retention E-076 Utilities Supply Company, Tools NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL Services TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 340.32 122.~ 468.2 110, 900. 00 191.86 17,600.00 370.60 170, 711. 25 $ 300,704.98 $ 363,313.88 "D-3" ~VVl'tl I ..JMl~.L 11"'\I .lVl't V.L..) l".lvl..) VI V"/-'\l'f\.:JL-vVUl'tl I P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 --~~----~~~-------~ :O~RACTOR: Mccalla Bros. DATE ____ ~_1a_.y_2_6..._,_19_7_6 ____ _ PUMP AND DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIO~AL PUMPING FACILITIES JOB: AT THE OCEAN OlITFALL PU~IPING STATION, PLA..'IT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-6-lB Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEOUOf) $ 11,958.92 In accordance with contract provisions, ·the following changes in the contract ~nd/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~vedo ADD: Increase base plate elevation from 22.35' to 24.85' (30'') by extension of colunm and shaft. (Required for engine stability due to lack of adequate founda- tion for vibration purposes.) 'Pwo units each $5,641.00 plus 6% sales tax TOTAL ADD ' No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~~~(ki;Q Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 Approved: $11,958.92. $11,958.92 $ 345,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 11,958.92 $ 356,958.92 ---- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF . Orange County, California By . ----------------------------------......, Associate Engineer By ------------------------------~-----Contractor By ---------------------C-t-li_c_f~E-n_g_i_n-ee~r· II E" AGENDA ITEM #8(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II E II II F II RESOLUTION NO. 76-95 APPROVING ADDENDUM TO JOB NO. J-6-lB A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WI11I MC CALLA BROS. FOR PUMPS AND OR IVE UNITS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lB, PROVIDING FOR CHANGE IN PROVISIONS FOR PAYMENT OF SALES TAX AND PROGRESS PAYMENTS TO THE CONTRACTOR * * * * * * * * * * * Tiie Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain addendwn, dated purchase agreement with McCalla Bros. for Pumps and Drive Units for Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lB, providing for payment of sales tax directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California, Board of Equalization, and revising .the progress payment provisions of said purchase agreement, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Calif~rnia, are hereby authorized and directed to execute· said addendum in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS II F" II G II RESOLUTION NO. 76-96 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lC AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * TI1e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tirn t the contractor, Valves and Primer Corpora ti on, has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC, on May 31, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. TI1at Job No. J-6-lC, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated Augu:;t 28, 1975; and, Section 4. TI1at the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(c) -ALL DISTRICTS II G'' ~ U UN I T ~ f\N l I A I l UN U l :::> I K. l l. I :::> U i U t<A N \J t:. l. U UN I 1 P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. ----------------------CONTRACTOR: ____ ~F_le_m_i_n~g __ Co_n_s_t_r_u_c_t_io_n~------------------DATE _______ J _u n_e~2_, __ 19_7_6 __ ~--~------ JOB: Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DR:Dl:J!i~ $ 13,600.22 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ~ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby appr~ved. ADD: 1. Excavate Trench (4100 LF@ 1. 15/LF) 2. Provide 9" Sand Bedding @ 4.00/Ton 3._ Backfill and compact 380 cy@ 5.25/cy ~. Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 40 pipe conduit: Ins ta 11 211 1 60 L F @ 1 • 00 Instil 11 3" 1 60 LF @ 1 • 50 · 5. Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 80 pipe condu!t: 6. Install 411 180 LF@ 2.00 Open trench install 411 P.V.C. Backfill, compact;" pave trenc~ 7. Supply and instaJl Edison cone. boxes with lids as called for on plan 1200.00 each x 3 TOTAL ADD $ 4,715.00 911.12 1,995.00 160.00 240.00 360.0Q 1,619.10 3,600.00 $13,600.22 Original Contract Price $ 141,441.10 Prev. Auth. Changes $ o.oo This Change (ADD) (~~) $ 13,600.22 Amended Contract Price $ 155,041.32 Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF • Orange County, California By ______________________ ~--~~---- Con s ult i ng Engineer By ----------------------------------- By ----------------------~---------~ Chief Engineer Contractor "'I" r AG END,~ ITEM #3 (n) -ALL DISTRICTS II H II II I II RESOLUTION NO. 76-94 AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO SIGN CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FRED A. H/\RPER, GENERAL MANAGER, TO SIGN ALL CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS NOT OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED BY THE CHAIRMEN OF THE DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, during the course of ordinary business on behalf of each and all of the Districts, certain documents and contracts need to be executed by, and on behalf of, the Districts; and, WHEREAS, during the course of these business transactions, the authority of the Boards of Directors by and through the execution of documents by the Chairmen is not required by law or by local rules of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, for convenience to the Districts, its employees, suppliers and contractors, the ordinary course o( business is greatly improved by having the General Manager execute necessary documents. NOW, THE.REFORB, the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. That Fred A. Harper, General Manager of the Districts, is hereby authorized to execute any and all documents on behalf of each District or on behalf of the Joint Administrative Organization that are required in the ordinary course and scope of the operations of the Districts. This authority shall not empower the General Manager to execute those contracts or documents whicl1 are expressly required by law, contract specifications, or other local rules, to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(1) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II C. I \ '- "J-1" June 1, 1976 Mr. Ray .E. Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue GOVERNMENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES-FOR THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT MAPS FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Dear Mr. Lewis: We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser- vices referenced above. The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks as outlined in your letter dated May 11, 1976, is as follows: 1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in your letter. We will prepare that portion of maps 21, 22, 27, 28, 34 and 35 that are within the District 1 boundary. We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on any previously prepared maps with the exception of those streets that are shown on the partially completed map 27. Total man hours required to complete this task is 30. 2. Search of records to acquire required documents -· total man hours:lO. 3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified - total man hours required: 4 4. The number of man hours required· for.this task is included in Task No. 1. S. The number of man hours required to compl~te this task is included in Task No. 3. 6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8. Total Man llours = 52 AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1 2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (Bldg. A), Santa Ana, California 92705, 714 547-6375 "J-111 r ~· c· "J-2" Mr. Ray E. Lewis County' sanitation Districts of Ora~ge County, California -2-· June 1, 1976 The above stated times are assuming that we will be able to secure within a two or three year period, the date that the property was acquired. Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is $1, 091. · Should you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call me. Thank you for your kind consideration. very truly, AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1 "J-2" Date: June 3, 1976 .. ENVIHONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Project; Raitt Street Trunk Sewer COUNTY SANITATION ,01srmc1 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA -0.2708 (714) 540-2910 ~ (71..C) 962-2..C 11 Location: From Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to _Myrtle Street Entity or Person Undertaking Project; County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County Staff Determination: I The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study- of this project in accordance with·Section.31 o~ the District\~ guidelines entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality, Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaini.ng whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conclusion: "K-1" The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a~ EIR will be required, ~c?_x. General Manag~ AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-1 11 .. .... ~, "K-2" INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC" of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 108-44 ELLIS AVE~UE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 .(71-4) 5.C0-2910 (714) 962-2411 This form shall be completed to comply California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 County Sanitation Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 5, California, dated February 15, 1974. with the Guidelines Implementing the As Amended and as adopted by the 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, Title and Location of Proj~ct: Raitt Street Trunk, Sanitation District No. 1 The proposed trunk ·extends from Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to Myrtle Street Description of Project The trunk will connect to the Sunflower Trunk and will be sized from 30" ·to 24" and be 3 1/4 miles long. It will cost about $1.SSM and will require R/W acquisition but no relocations. This trunk will relieve the Greenville-Sullivan Trunk and will be growth inducing. GUIDELINES 1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 25? Yes No x (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form) 2. Does the project qualify as: a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes No x. b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes~-No x c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes ___ _ No x d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 34) Yes~-No x e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30) Yes No x {If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.) AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-2" If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following: .3. Initial study procedures A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 31) I i.· Will the project have any significant effect on the environment as per the following: ·, a. Is it in conflict with envirorunental plans and goals that have been adopted by the community where the project is to be located? Yes No x b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect? Yes No x c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes ~-No d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident or-migratory fish or wildlife species? Yes No x e. Does it breach any published national, state or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? Yes No x f. Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas? Yes No x g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? Yes No x .. h. Could it .cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation? Yes No x -- i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic hazards? Yes No x j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes x No If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail. This trunk has excess capacity and is sized to provide for growth. x If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report may be required. 4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown in the "Guidelines Implementing the .California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Amended" "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-3" I ~ t . , 5. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in causing preparation of same. The Environmental Impact Report will be prepared by staff of the County Sanitation Distridt No. 1 after the Board of Directors has passed a resolution for its preparation . Evaluation made by . ~~ Signature AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 6/3/76 Date II L" RESOLUTION NO. 76-105-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * TI1e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. Tirnt the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, on May 31, 1976; and, Section 2. 111at by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has reconunended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. 111at the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and, Section 4. 111at the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(M) -DISTRICT 2 II L" "M" RESOLUTION NO. 76-106-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 or ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING .SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, on May 31, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' C~ief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said· reconunendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and, Section 4. TI1at the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -DISTRICT 2 "M" Date: June 3, 1976 Name of Project: Location: Entity or Person Undertaking Project: Staff Determination: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) · COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT~ of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. DOX 8127 108.C.C ELLIS AVENOE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA '_.__1)8 (71.C) 5.C0-2910 ,,._.,,,. (71-4) 962-2"411 Beginning at Coast Highway Trunk at Back Bay Drive and Dunes Park and continuing in Back Bay Drive to Big Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the pump station at Jamboree Road· County Sanitation District No. S of Orange County The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study of this project in accordance with Section 31 of the District's guidelines entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaining whether.the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the fol I owing conc'l us ion: · "N-1" The project could not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a negative delcaration should be prepared. AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-1" ... INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT~ of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108.c.4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71..C) 5.C0-2910 (71..C) 962-2.C 11 This form shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, dated February 15, 1974. Title and Location of Project Back Bay Trunk Sewer, County Sanitation District No. 5 Beginning at Coast Highway Tru~k at Back Bay Drive and Dunes Park and continuing in Back Bay Drive to Big Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the pump station at Jamboree Road Description of Project The proposed project is the design and construction of a 24-inch cast iron gravity sewer to replace an existing, at capacity, pump station at Jamboree Road. Development under construction and approved for construction will exceed the capacity of the pump station. The pump station will be fitted with generators and used for emergencies. GUIDELINES 1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in· Section 25? Yes xx No (If activity docs not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form) 2. Does the project qualify as: "N-2" a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes __ _ No xx No xx c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes __ _ No xx d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 34) Yes___ No xx e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30) Yes No xx (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.) AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-2" ... If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following: 3. Initial study procedures A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 31) I. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment as per the following: ·· a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have been adopted by the community where the project is to be located? Yes No xx b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect? Yes No xx c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes Noxx d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? Yes No xx e. Does it breach any published national, state or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? Yes No xx f. Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas? Yes No xx g. Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? Yes No xx h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation? Yes No xx i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic hazards? Yes No xx j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No xx If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail. Present service area is 85% developed or approved for development. If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report may be required. 4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown in the "Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Amended" "N-3" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-3" ._., ~ 5. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in causing preparation of same . Evaluation made by ,. . .--.-~ , .. "N-4" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 May 25, 1976 Date "N-4" "0-1" June 1, 1976 Mr. Ray .E. Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT MAPS FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 Dear Mr. Lewis: GOVERNMENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser- vices referenced above. The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks as outlined in your letter dated May li, 1976, is as follows: 1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in your letter~ We will prepare that portion of maps 16, 17, 22, 23, 28 and 29 that are within the District 6 boundary. We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on any previously prepared maps. Total man hours required to complete this task is 34. 2. Search of records to acquire required documents -total man hours: 26. 3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified - total man hours required: 5. · 4. The number of man hours required for this task 1S included in Task No. 1. s. The number of man hours required to complete this task is included in Task No. 3. 6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8. Total Man Hours = 73. AGENDA ITEM #8(s) -DISTRICT 6 "0-1" 2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (£1ldg. A), Santa Ana, CClliforniJ 92705, 714 547·6375 (-. ..,,,, ( ,,,,,..-..... \ ¥ "0-2" Mr. Ray E. Lewis County Sanitation Districts of Ora~ge County, California -2-June 1, 1976 The above stated times are assuming that w~ will be able to secure within a two or three year period, the date that the property was acquired. Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is $1,521 .. Should you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call me. Thank you for your kind consideration. very truly, AGENDA ITEM #8(s) -DISTRICT 6 "0-2" II p11 RESOLUTION NO. 76-110-7 AUTI IORI ZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES RE OFFSITE SEWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, IN CONNECTION WITH OFFSITE SE\\1l::R LINE SOUTHWESTERLY OF INTER- SECTION OF LA COLINA DRIVE AND RED HILL AVENUE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 10, 1976, wherein an easement in the vicinity southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue for offsite sewer service. is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from La Colina Associates, a California Limited Partnership; and Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in th~ Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(v) -DISTRICT 7 II P" "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 76-111-7 ACCEPTING GR/\NT OF EASJ:MENT FROM LERNER OIL COMP/\NY AND AlJTllOR I Z I Ne; EXE CUTI ON OF ACIU:EMENT RE EASEMENT RELATIVE TO CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-4A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LERNER OIL COMPANY, INC., AND AUTIIORIZING EXECU- TION OF AGREB1ENT RE SAID EASEMENT RELATIVE TO CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-4A * * * * * * * * * * * TI1e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES IIEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. TI1at the certain Grant of Easement, dated ~~~~~~~~~ wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Lerner Oil Company, Inc.; and, . Section 2. That the real property over which said Grant of Easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is granted in connection with operation of Sub-Trunk Sewers, Contract No. 7-3A-4A, in the vicinity of El Camino Real and the Santa Ana Freeway, in the City of Tustin; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California; and, Section 5. That the certain Agreement dated between County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and Lerner Oil Company, Inc., relative to said easement, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 7. TI1at payment in the amount of $1, 800. 00 to Lerner Oil Company, Inc. provided in said Agreement and Grant.of Easement, is hereby authorized. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting hcl<l June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(w) -DISTRJCT 7 "Q" <EXCERPTED FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS) 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION -A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra- tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at· the regular meeting in July of each year. The Chairman and Vice ·Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and ihe nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the members of .the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. II R" AGENDA ITEM #12 -ALL DISTRICTS II R" II s11 RESOLUTION NO. 76-99 ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, Cal~fornia, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange Countf', a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted for the Districts, subject to the approval thereof by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange; and, Section 2. That the Secretary of the Districts be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and to request said Board of Supervisors to approve said Code in accordance with Government Code Section 87303. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #13(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II S" "T-1" REPLY TO ATTN OF: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA PASADENA OFFICE PASADENA, CALlfORNIA 91103 HN-l(DEB) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Gentlemen: May 25, 1976 Subject: CSDOC/NASA Contract for the JPL Activated Carbon Treatment Process Reference is made to our meeting of May 19, 1976, pertaining to an apparent $20,000.00 discrepancy. For this reason, the following is submitted: In an updated letter from the State Water Resources Control Board issued between May 3 and May 28 (attached), a two-month predesign phase effort was approved. The JPL effort was limited to $20,000, to investigate the "best reactor with the basis for choosing this reactor and available reactor sizes specifically delineated." An experimental test program was specifically required to meet this requirement. This approval was followed by a March 28 letter (attached) req~estinr JPL to commence efforts immediately. This letter was followed by a Purchase Order No. 28284 authorizing JPL to proceed in accordance wiih the March 28 letter. Reference is made in this purchase order to our proposal and "the agreement." A subsequent modification to this purchase order was made to make NASA the vendor, JPL participated in the described prcdesign phase, and expended over $32,000 in those two months. On June 20, the State Water Resources Control Board authorized contin- uation of the project. On June 24 a draft contract was received from CSDOC for $280,000. Figure 1 of this contract (attached) described expenditures by month with a cumulative total of $259,500. The mis- understanding appears at this point. JPL assumed the $20,500 to be available for contractual change in scope. This misunderstanding did not come to light until later. In the meantime, JPL was following the plan of Figure 1 month by month. AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" .· ·. "T-2 11 2 In January 1976, by telecon, Ray Lewis asked JPL to take a greater !Ole in the operations. This expanded effort was begun in February with a request for additional funding forwarded to CSDOC on March 4. The additional effort requested by CSDOC amounted to $74,226. Instead of requesting this amount, we deducted what we thought was the $20,500 for scope change. At this point, the misunderstanding came to light. It should be pointed out that there has been no misunderstanding of the work to be accomplished. JPL did the $20,000 effort in April/Nay, followed the contractual effort as described in Figure 1, and provided the additional effort as requested by CSDOC starting in February. Any error, if we take CSDOC position, is only that we should have requested $74,226 instead of $53,726. Our position r6nains that we received a Purchase Order in the amount of $20,000.00 and a Contract in the amount of $280,000.00 for a total effort of $300,000.00. Our Task Order to JPL, which was provided to CSDOC, indicated a total of $300,000.00. Subsequently, we have accepted Amendment No. 1 to the contract, increasing the effort by $53,726.00 for a new total of $353,726.00. Since Amendment No. 1 to the Contract reads "up to a maximum total cost of $333,726.00", our amended Task Order to JPL will have to be limited to this amount. It is, therefore, requested that immediate action be initiated to increase the contract total authorized by $20,000.00 to enable JPL to complete this effort. Sincerely, ~~~~ Edward F. Morris, Chief Contract Placement Branch AGENDA ITEM #14CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" II U" RESOLUTION NO. 76-98 AUTI-IORIZING AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH NASA RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO TIIE CONTRACT WITH NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS FOR ADDITIONAL PRE-DESIGN WORK * * * * * * * * * * * 111e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. 111at certain amendment dated , to the ~~~~~~~~~~ contract by and between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and County Sanitation District No. 1, authorizing increase in the maximum amount for services from $333,726.00 to $353,726.00 for additional pre-design work, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. TI1at the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #14Ca) -ALL DISTRICTS II u II LAW Of"f"ICE:S RICHARD 0. ,.RAZ EE STEPHEN C.STEWART THOMAS L. WOOORUF"F .JEFf"REY A. HARTMAN 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1020 SANTA ANA, CALI f"ORNIA 92701 AREA CODE 714 835-6212 "V" June 3, 1976 Board of Directors County. Sanitation District No. 8 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Caiifornia 92708 The Resolution presented to your board for action at this agenda is simply to ratify and confirm the fact that Re- organization No. 31 between the South Coast County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District has been accomplished and mee.ts all legal requirements as contained in Health and Safety Code Section 4730, to enable to Water District, as the successor agency, to have a member on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8~ South Coast County Water District, as a successor agency, and having met the requirements of the County Sanitation District Act with regard to membership, will be the only Water District with rights of membership in the County Sanitation District. This is based solely on the fact of the merger between the two districts and the fact that the special State Legislation was enacted to enable South Coast County Water District to continue its rights of membership. TLW:mp Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "V" RESOLUTION NO. 76-112-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 8 CONFIRMING THE SUBSTITUTION OF SOUTH COAST COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AS A MEMBER AGENCY OF THE DISTRICT IN PLACE OF SOUTH LAGUNA SANITARY DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730 WHEREAS, South Laguna Sanitary District is a member agency of County Sanitation District No. 8 and a member agency of the Joint Administrative Orgauization; and, WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District, a public agency organized pursuant to the provisions of the County Water District Act, has accomplished a reorganization with South Laguna Sanitary District, a public agency organized pursuant to the Sanitary Dis- trict Act of 1923; and, WHEREAS, the merger of South coast county water District and South La.guna Sani tar_y District has the effect of the dissolution of South Laguna Sanitary District with the South Coast County Water District assuming all rights, duties and responsibilities together with the assumption of all assets and liabilities of the Sanitary District; and, WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District will now provide, through an improvement district, all of the same services formerly provided by South Laguna Sanitary District; and, WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 4730, of the County Sanitation District Act, has recently been amended, in furtherance of the accomplishment of the reorganization between South Coast County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District to expressly provide for the special condition wherein a County Water District which is wholly or partly in the Sanitation Dis- "W-1" AGENDA ITEN #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-1" trict and which on or before July 1, 1977, has assumed the responsibilities, rights, duties assets, liabilities and obligations of a Sanitary District, which at the time of such assumption had representation on the Board of Directors of the Sanitation District, would be included in the membership on the Board of Directors of the Sanitation District; and, WHEREAS, the reorganization between South Coast County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District has satisfied all legal requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 to enable it to have a member on the County Sanitation District No. 8 Board of Directors; and, WHEREAS, the reorganization of South Coast County Water Dis- trict and South Laguna Sanitary District has been approved by the voters at a special election: NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD-OF DIRECTORS DOES HEREBY FIND, DECLARE AND RESOLVE ·AS FOLLOWS: Section.l. That South Coast County Water District, meets all legal requirements as contained in Health and Safety Code Section 4730 to entitle it to membership on the Board of Directors of this district. Section 2. This Board of Directors confirms and hereby grants the South Coast County Water District membership on County Sani- tation District No. 8 in accordance with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1976. "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-2" "X" May 19, 1976 County· Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Off ice Box 8127 . Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Sirs: We, the ownership of the 107.876 acres, hereby request annexa- tion to the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. A legal- description. is attached describing the boundary of this proposed annexation, as well as a description of certain parcels within said boundary. Certain parcels are designated by letter and the others by a number. The reasoning for these parcels being designated within the boundary of the proposed annexation is that we are requesting to be relieved from payment of the annexation fees on a temporary basis. Relief from payment of fees is requested for Parcels A, B and C, which are equestrian trails and are designated as such on the City of Orange Trail System. Parcel F is a driving range for the Lazy B Golf Course and Ridgeline Racquet Club. Parcels 1 and D are the Lazy B Golf Course itself. The balance of the property; i .. e., Parcels E c.nd 2f consisting of 57.,373 acres, is proposed to be subject to the usual annexation fees. Therefore, we are hereby requesting that relief from payment of annexation fees be given on the parcels described due to the type of land use involved. If and when development occurs on any of said parce·ls, it is understood that the proper fees would be due and payable at that time.· It is our intent, however, that the golf course and driving range become an economic unit, remain undeveloped and never become a contributor to the sewage disposal prob.lem. Ownership of all of the parcels are by the same· persons and in the same proportions: Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, and Ridgeline Ranch, etcQ is owned by Lazy B Estates, Inc., a Corporation .. There are no residents on the property and, therefore, no voters. ~~ Norman Brock Attachment .. _ .......... ,., : 10604 MEADS AVENUE • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669 • (714) 633-4710 • (714) G33-9500 AGENDA ITEM #33(A) -DISTRICT 7 . "X" MEETING DATE June 9, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5.6,7.8 and 11 DISTRICT 1 (EVANS) •••••••.• GARTHE •..••• _____ _ (EDGAR) ••.•..•. ~ SHARP •••••• __ ---- (DIEDRICH) .•••.. BATTIN······ --__ -- ..._,, RIMA ••...•.• ------ DISTRICT 2 (GROOT) ••••.•••• WEDAA ••••••• ~HOLLINDENL .•• SCOTT •••.••• = = = D I ED R I CH). • . • . . CLAR K ••..... GARTHE) ••.••.•. EVANS •••••.• ------ ~WEDDLE) .....•.. FOX ..••••••.• ------ DE Jysus>.. .... HOLT .•..••••. = = = THOM ••••••...• KAYWOOD •..•. _____ _ PERRY ••••••. (HOYT) •••••.•.•• SMITH •••.... ------ ~TIPTON) •.•••••• WINN........ . = = WARD) ........... WOOD •••••••• GRAHAM) ••...•.. YOUNG •••••.• = = ~ DISTRICT 3· (WARD) ••.•.. -•... WOOD •••••••• _____ _ (HOLLINDEN) •.•. SVALSTAD···· ------ (GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· ____ -· - (WEDDLE)···· .. ·• COOPER·· .. •· ------ (SYLVIA).······· COX··· ... ·••• ------ CULVER· .. ··• ·------ (GARTHE). ·•·· .. ·EVANS··· .. •· ____ -- THOM) .......... KAYWOOD··00 • _____ _ ~PRIEST) .. •··•·• FRESE······· __ · ---- LACAYO) ••• ••••· MAC LAIN···· ------ DAVI s) · · · · · · · .. MEYER······· ____ -- OLSON • · · · • • • ____ -- DIEDRICH) •• ·••• SCHMIT······ ____ --~WI EDER) ........ PATTINSON··· _____ _ YOUNG)········· STEVENS····· _____ _ MILLER) •••••.•. WEISHAUPT··· ____ -- DISTRICT 5 MC INNIS •••• _____ ._ (DIEDRICH) .••••. RILEY ••••••• _____ _ (WILLIAMS) ••.••• ROGERS •••.•. _____ _ · DISTRICT 6 RIMA •••••••• _____ _ (ROGERS) ..•••••• RYCKOFF ••.•• _____ _ (DIEDRICH) .••••• BATTIN .•.••• _____ _ DISTRICT 7 ROGERS) .... •··• BARRETT····· _____ _ !EDGAR) •.••••••• SALTARELLI· _____ _ SILLS) ......... BURTON •.•.•• _____ _ DIEDRJCH). •• ... CLARK······· _____ _ EVANS)···· .. ·•· GARTHE • • · • · • _____ _ GLOCKNER···· _____ _ (HOYT)·········· SMITH······· _____ _ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _____ _ SHENKMAN •••• _____ _ WIEDF.R ...... ____ ._ -- DISTRICT 8 EDWARDS ••.•• _____ ._ (JOHNSON)) •...•. S~IEENEY ..••• ------ (DIEDRICH •.•.•• RILEY ........ ------ 6/8/76 JOINT BOARDS ROGER Si········ BARRETT······ DIEDlHCH) •••.•• BATTIN-··· ··• == == GRAY)) .••••••••• BLACKMAN •.•• __ ~ SILLS ••• \ ..• : •• BURTON •.•... ___ _ DIEDRICHJ ...... CLARK ....... ___ _ WEDDLE) •••.••.•. COOPER ••••••• ___ _ SYLVIA) .•••••••• cox .......... ---- CULVER ••••.•• ___ _ ~GARTHEl .•••.••.• EVANS •••.••.. ___ _ WEDDLE ..••••.•• FOX ...•••.•.. ___ _ PR I EST .••••.•.• FRESE .••.•... ___ _ EVANS) •.••••.••. GARTHE. •.••.. ___ _ GLOCKNER •... ___ _ ~DE Jf:SUS) ••.••• HOLT .••.•.•.. ___ _ THOM) .•..••••••. KAYWOOD .•... ___ _ LACAYO) .••.....• MAC LAIN .•.• ___ _ ROGERS) •.•••..•• MC INNIS •••• ___ _ (DAVI s) .......... MEYER •••••..• ___ _ OLSON •••••••. ___ _ (WIEDER) ••••••.• PATTINSON ..• ___ _ PERRY ....... . (DIEDRICH) .•••.. RILEY •.••.••• = == RIMA ••••.•••. WILLIAMS) .••.•. ROGERS .•••••• = == ROGERS1 ••••••.• RYCKOFF. •...• ___ _ EDGAR) •••••••.•. SALTARELLI •. ___ _ DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ••.•... ___ _ HOLLINDEN) .•.•. SCOTT ....•... ___ _ EDGAR) .•.••••.•. SHARP .•..•••. ___ _ SHENKMAN ..•• ___ _ ! HOYT) .••••••••.. SMITH ..•.•••. ___ _ YOUNG) .••.•••.•. STEVENS ••.•• ___ _ HOLLINDENL .•. SVALSTAD •••• ___ _ GROOT) ...•••••.• WEDAA .•••••.• ___ _ MILLERl. ••••••• WEISHAUPT ••• ___ _ WIEDER •..••• ___ _ ~TI PTONl ••••••.• WINN ••••.•.•. ___ _ WARD) ••.•.•••••• WOOD .•••••••• ___ _ GRAHAM) •••••••• YOUNG .•.••••• ___ _ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS JUNE 9J 1976 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 1. THERE IS NO SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DURING JUNE, 2. IF ANY DIRECTORS ARE INTERESTED IN BEING CONSIDERED AS AN ALTERNATE ON SCCWRP (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT)) ADDRESS A LETTER OF INTEREST TO JOINT CHAIRMAN, 3, REPORT ON THE ATTACHED LETTER FROM RICHARD CODDINGTON, EPA. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 100 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 Donald E. Winn, Joint Chairman Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dear Mr. Winn: JUN 1 1m6 We would like to respond to your letter of May 13, 1976, to Paul De Falco, and explain our understanding of the present status of the Orange County Environmental Impact Statement. The scope of the EIS remains essentially the same as described in the "Issue Paper" and outline attached to the Memorandum of Understanding transmitted to the Districts on May 14, 1975. The only change is in the secondary impact/air quality analysis which is possibly more sophisticated than originally visualized. The original contract with J. B. Gilbert & Associates was for $60,000. We expressed our concern at the time of contract negotiation that the final cost for the EIS would likely be considerably above this amount. However, we concurred with the position taken by the Districts that it would be better to let the contract for $60,000 and increase it when it became clear that additional monies were required. This seemed to be a reasonable position for maintaining fiscal control, since at that time we did not have experience to accurately determine what impact statements should cost. The increases proposed by J. B. Gilbert & Associates are as follows: EIS Draft Completion . Printing of Draft EIR/EIS (including some lay-out work) Reclamation Engineering $55,000 $35,000 $10,000 I -2- The reclamation engineering work will eliminate an inadequacy of the draft Facilities Plan. The $10,000 for this work is properly ascribed to the Facilities Planning effort, and not to the EIS. In order to avoid delays, the reclamation work will be carried along parallel to the main EIS development, and incorporated later in the draft EIS or in an addendum. The printing costs on further examination appear excessive. A more likely cost is $15,000, although this may fluctuate depending on the number of copies deemed necessary. We feel the costs incurred by this EIS to date are quite reasonable. In fact, they are considerably lower than the costs projected for the other two large South Coast impact statements. Additionally, we are very optimistic over the contents of this EIS. We expect it to satisfy its main objective of complying with the provisions of NEPA and CEQA. In so doing, it will become a very important background document for future planning efforts, including wastewater facilities planning, the air quality maintenance plan, and "208" planning. The cooperation exhibited so far by the Districts, the consultant, SWRCB, and EPA has allowed considerable and rapid progress toward the completion of the document under the "joint EIS" procedure. We will do our utmost to continue this cooperative effort and complete the EIS as soon as possible. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~Lf) f'JJP~ Richard Coddi~~tg}i Deputy Director Construction Grants Program cc: Larry Walker, SWRCB . A.J::vi Jerome E. Gilbertp ~-;r5 f)~/1d~~f~ ;) ~ .ii?!~J ~ ~.,.; , . ~". !)c}/"Jv.J . ert» /:>)>~~;,; t// ~~ II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL · AGENDA ITEMS JUNE 9J 1976 -7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Post Office Box 81 27 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (4) Consideration of motion to receive and fi le minute excerpts from the following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) City District Active Alternate Fullerton 3 Frances Wood Robert Ward* Huntington Beach 3 Ron Pattinson Harriett Wieder* 11 Harriett Weider* ll Ron Shenkman Los Alamitos 3 Ph illip E. Cox* Charles E. Sylvia Sea l Beach 3 Thom as Blackman* Russell B. Gray ; JUNE 9J 1976 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 1. THERE IS NO SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DURING JUNE. 2. IE ANY DIRECTORS ARE INTERESTED IN BEING CONSIDERED AS AN ALTERNATE ON SCCWRP (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT)J ADDRESS A LETTER OF INTEREST TO JOINT CHAIRMAN. 3. REPORT ON THE ATTACHED LETTER FROM RICHARD CODDINGTON, EPA. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 100 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111 Donald E. Winn, Joint Chairman Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dear Mr. Winn: JUN 1 1976 We would like to respond to your letter of May 13, 1976, to Paul De Falco, and explain our understanding of the present status of the Orange County Envirorunental Impact Statement. The scope of the EIS remains essentially the same as described in the "Issue Paper" and outline attached to the Memorandum of Understanding transmitted to the Districts on May 14, 1975. The only change is in the secondary impact/air quality analysis which is possibly more sophisticated than originally visualized. The original contract with J. B. Gilbert & Associates was for $60,000. We expressed our concern at the time of contract negotiation that the final cost for the EIS would likely be considerably above this amount. However, we concurred with the position taken by the Districts that it would be better to let the contract for $60,000 and increase it when it became clear that additional monies were required. This seemed to be a reasonable position for maintaining fiscal control, since at that time we did not have exper~ence to accurately determine what impact statements should cost. The increases proposed by J. B. Gilbert & Associates are as follows: EIS Draft Completion Printing of Draft EIR/EIS (including some lay-out work) Reclamation Engineering $55,000 $35,000 $10,000 -2- The reclamation engineering work will eliminate an inadequacy of the draft Facilities Plan. The $10,000 for this work is properly ascribed to the Facilities Planning effort, and not to the EIS. In order to avoid delays, the reclamation work will be carried along parallel to the main EIS development, and incorporated later in the draft EIS or in an addendum. The printing costs on further examination appear excessive. A more likely cost is $15,000, although this may fluctuate depending on the number of copies deemed necessary. We feel the costs incurred by this EIS to date are quite reasonable. In fact, they are considerably lower than the costs projected for the other two large South Coast impact statements. Additionally, we are very optimistic over the contents of this EIS. We expect it to satisfy its main objective of complying with the provisions of NEPA and CEQA. In so doing, it will become a very important background document for future planning efforts, _including wastewater facilities planning, the air quality maintenance plan, and "208" planning. The cooperation exhibited so far by the Districts, the consultant, SWRCB, and EPA has allowed considerable and rapid progress toward the completion of the document under the "joint EIS" procedure. We will do our utmost to continue this cooperative effort and complete the EIS as soon as possible. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, e4L~~ Deputy Director Construction Grants Program cc: Larry Walker, SWRCB l;:vi Jerome E. Gilbertj} ~ §5 ,;J rJfl'V;, b ~ 'tfaJ }I~ Wow/-,~-~---:"' )!l,"J J M ifv ~ /l:v.; ·' .. . P~ · ·. p · !Jo,~/'JvJ e?) ~,~# tr foffN ~"' 1o r ' ' DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (4) -ITEMS ON SUPPLEM ENT AL AGENDA Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following cities regarding elections of mayors and appointment of alternates, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) City District Active Alternate Fullerton 3 Frances Wood Robert Ward* Huntington Beach 3 Ron Pattinson Harriett Wieder* 11 Harriett Weider* 11 Ron Shenkman Lo s Alamitos 3 Phillip E. Cox* Char l es E. Sylvia Seal Beach 3 Thomas Blackman* Russell B. Gray II COAnos OF DIRECTons County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE JUNE 9J 1976 -7:30 P.M. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE MEETING. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessaryjt·~(~v,,' · ,.-L (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT (6) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 May 12, 1976 regular District 2 May 12, 1976 regular District 3 May 12, 1976 regular District 5 ~ay 12, 1976 regular District 6 May 12, 1976 regular District 7 May 12, 1976 regular District 8 April 14, 1976 :regular District 11 May 12, 1976 regular, and June 7, 1976 adjourned ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (7) ALL DISTRICTS Ron CALL Von: .......... -Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND See page(s) CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND See page(s) DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) "B" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) II B" DISTRICT NO. 5 See page(s) "B" DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) II B" DISTRICT NO: 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page (s) "C" DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C" (8) ALL DISTRICTS Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 8 (A) THROUGH 8( w ) All matters placed upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall he considered in the ·regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- '· (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pump and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, authorizing an addition of $11,958.92 to the contract with McCalla Bros. to increase base plate elevation. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-95, approving Addendum No. 1 to the purchase contract with McCalla Bros. for Pump and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, in form approved by the General Counsel, to provide for payment of sales tax directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California, and amending progress payment provisions (does not affect total contract price) ·See page "F" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-96, accepting Tilting Disc Check Valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station_, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lC, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. ~ee page "G" (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, authorizing an addition of $13,600.22 to the contract with Fleming Construction for trenching and underground vaults in connection with City of Huntington Beach improvements incorporated into said contract, Districts to be reimbursed by City for said cost. See page "H" (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-93, determining the prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts' construction contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding Resolution No. 75-85 (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31, 1976; and approving recommended budget transfers (mailed with agenda material) (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses incurred (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to attend and participate in the AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management of Wastewater Agencies to be held in Seattle, Washington on July 21-23, 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses-incurred (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- I-' I (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-94, authorizing Fred A. Harper, General Manager, to sign all contracts and documents not required to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. See page "I" (j) Consideration of motion granting temporary authority for payment of overtime to Districts' Principal Accountant up to September 30, 1976, due to extended illness of other accounting staff personnel DISTRICT 1 (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $ i, 091. 00. See page "J" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 (1) Considerations of actions relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "K" (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare draft Environmental Impact Report relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-105-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "L" (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-106-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "M" DISTRICT 3 (o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Solomon Shapiro, dated May 20, 1976, in the amount of $50,000.00 in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, and refer to the contractor and District's liability insurance carrier for appropriate action (p) Consideration of motion to deny leave to file late claim by Karen L. Morton for lack of sufficient showing of excusable neglect relative to a claim in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2, as recommended by the General Counsel (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of actions relative to Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "N" (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare negative declaration declaring that the Bay Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) will not have a significant effect on the environment and directing the filing of notice thereof (r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids for purchase of 24-inch Ductile Pipe for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) , Contract No. 5-20A :i c.J/ l, "; i c (,, J tie. -Q DISTRICT 6 (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,521.00. See page "0" DISTRICT 7 (t) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-108-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1.3834 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Arnapola Street and Handy Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 52 -St. Arnand Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) (u) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-109-7, ordering annexation of approximately 11.165 acres to the District in the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extended to a point westerly of Santiago Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 49 -Tract No. 8306 to County Sanitation District No. 7) (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-110-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from La Colina Associates, a California Limited Partnership, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer service in connection with a sewer line southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue, at no cost to the District. See page "P" (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-111-7, approving and authorizing execution of agreenent with Lerner Oil Company, Inc. for right of way in connection with Contract No. 7-3A-4A, Sub-Trunks; authorizing payment in the amount of $1,800.00; and accepting Grant of Easement in connection with said right of way. See page "Q" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -5- (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any . (10) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget: (1) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of motion approving 1976-77 personnel requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 76-97 amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-167 (Copy of resolution in Directors' -meeting folders) (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77 ROLL CALL VOTE .............. -Joint Operating Budget (b) (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1976, and declaring.that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1976-77 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for Security Monitoring System, Specification No. PW-054, for an amount not to exceed $13,000 for installation and maintenance for the first year, plus cost of annual maintenance thereafter Consideration of motion approving concept of value engineering procedures relative to the design of 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with Federal and· State guidelines, to provide cost-effective design of said facility (d) Discussion re amending connection charge ordinances in Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 to permit waiver of all or portion of connection fees under special circumstances. (e) Consideration of motion approving nominations of Frances Wood, Chairman, District No. 3, (member) and Fred A. Harper, General Manager, (alternate) as the Districts' representatives on the Southern California Association of Governments 208 Program Committee ~ (12) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "R" ~e. lL~ ·-~·.:'' ,,._ ljj(_ ~<'/ -6- (13) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8 & 11 Hearing on proposed Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County: (a) Open hearing (b) Report of General Counsel (c) Actions to date: (1) Resolution No.-76-90, setting time and place of hearing adopted on May 12, 1976 by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 (2) Notice (resolution) published May 21, 1976 (Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11) Santa Ana Register (3) Notice published May 28, 1976 (District 8) Daily Pilot (4) Notice of hearing, resolutuion and copy of Code mailed to' affected parties on May 28, 1976 or June 1, 1976 ,\ ' Roll can Vote or cast (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-99 adopting Conflict of Interest Unanimous Ballot Code. See page "S" (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) (b) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from National Aeronautics and Space Administration, dated May 25, 1976, in connection with JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility. See page "T" Consideration of Resolution No. 76-98, authorizing amendment to the contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JPL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services from $333,726 to $353,726 for additional pre-design work. See page "U" (15) DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 Consideration of the following resolutions amending Section 1, Subsection (b), of the annexation policy resolutions of the respective Districts providing for the change indicated below: Roll Ca?! Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot (a) DISTRICT 2 (b) DISTRICT 3 (c) DISTRICT 5 (d) DISTRICT 7 (e) DISTRICT 11 Resolution No. 76-100-2 76-101-3 76-102-5 76-103-7 76-104-11 Amending Resolution No. 75-42-2 75-43-3 75-15-5 75-44-7, as amended 75-49-11 Delete sentence: "The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established." Add sentence: "The date of payment of annexation acreage fee to the District shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinabove established." -7- (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 (19) Roll Call Vote or Cast Unanimous Ballot -. (20) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-117-2, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from Calprop Corporation for a permanent easement in connection with the realignment of Yorba Linda Force Main (from Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard), Contract No. 2-16-2, and authorizing payment in the amount of $7,000.00 for said easement. DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn : 1 , ,~ (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 3 (23) Consideration of motion to adjourn '~i,1 ' (24) DISTRICT S Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's memorandum Roll Call Vote or Cast dated June 3, 1976; and approving Resolution No. 76-112-8, confirming Unanimous Ball~t the substitution of South Coast County Water District as a member agency i_i ,,,. :.' of the Districts in place of South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to ~c \:\,_{} '• ~~~ pro~~~ions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730. See pages "V" tl \ ~~-(29,) DISTRICT 8 v Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn r 'i ) (31) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -8- (32) 'L (33) (35) DISTRICT 11 Cj • -vi Consideration of motion to adjourn 1 , DISTRICT 7 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Lazy B Estates, Inc. for annexation of approximately 107.876 acres of territory to the District in the Orange Park Acres area between Randall Street and Amapola Avenue and refer to staff. See page "X" (b) Discussion of Lazy B Estates, Inc. request for waiver of fees for portion of proposed annexation DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn q ,1-Y -9- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) June 3, 1976 NOTICE OF REGUlAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1) 2) 3) SJ 6) 7) 8) & 11 WEDNESDAY~ JUNE 9) 1976) 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY) CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: DIRECTORS' ORIENTATION MEETING -Wednesday, June 16, 1976, 5:30 p.m. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-29·10 962-2411 Post Ottice Box 8127 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, Cal if ., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS June 9, 1976 -7:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the mor e important, non-routine items which appear on the enc losed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are now enc losed with the agenda material, summarizing the bills paid since the May Joint Board meeting. Joint Boards No. 8-a -Approving Change Order No. 1 to Job No. J-6-lB. In September, 1974, one bid was received for the furnishing of the equipment and the installation of additional pumping facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station. Th~ Boards rejected this single bid and instructed the staff to procure the neces sary equipment under separate equipment contracts and sub - sequently award a contract for the installation of said equipment . Bids were received concurrently for the f urnishing of the engines , as well as the pumps and gear drives. Later it was discovered that to mitigate the vibration problems of the engines to be located on the second floor of the Outfall Booster Station, 22-inches of additional foundation were required for stabilizat ion. The pump manufacturer quoted .the pump shafts based on a shorter length, and a change order for the additional 22 -inches is required to meet the final design installation. It is the staff's recommendation that this change order in the amount of $11,958.92 for the additional pump extens ions be approved. No. 9-c -Acceptance of Job No. J-6-lC. This contract to provide two tilting disc check valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Foster Outfall Booster Station is now complete. The supplier has furnished the required equipment under this contract . The action appearing on your a g enda authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion. No. 9-d -Change Order No. 1 -Brookhurst Street Improvements, Job No. P2-8-8. This cooperative street improvement project at Plant No . 2 between the Districts and the City of Huntington Beach initially --~ included in the original bid the installation of street lights, underground wiring and appurtenant electrical pull boxes . In Addendum No. 1 to the bid proposal, the st-reet light ing facilities were deleted at the request of the City because of contractual difficulties with the Southern California Edison Company. Now that these contractual agreements have been consummated, the City has requested that the street lights be included in the project by change order in the amount of $13,600.22. The cost will be part of the City's responsibility on this project. It is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that this change order be approved. No. 8-e -D.etermining Prevailing Wage Rates for ·con:str·uction Work by Outside Contractors. The State Government Code requires that we adopt, periodically, a resolution determining the prevailing labor rates for public works construction contracts. Since this resolution is quite lengthy, it is not included in the agenda material although it will be available for inspection at the meeting. It should be em pha sized that this resolution does not establish wage rates for our employees; it involves only employees of contractors engaged in construction work for public projects. No. 8-f -Financial Report. Included with the agenda material is the Districts' Financial Report for the nine-month period ended March 31st . The Director of Finance is recommending several budget transfers for reasons stated in the report. If any Director has questions concerning the Financial Report and the recommended budget transfers, please call either Wayne Sylvester~ the Districts' Director of Finance, or Fred Harper, telephone 5~0-2910. No. 8-g -General Authorization for Attendance of Personnel at Meetings. For the past several years, the General Manager has been authorized, on an annual basis, to designate mem bers of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, etc., within the State, which he believes will be of value to the Districts. It is recommended that this authorization be renewed. No. 8-h -AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management , July 21-23. The Districts' Director of Finance has been invited to parti- cipate in a scheduled AMSA technical conference on finance and management for wastewater agencies to be held in Seattle July 21~23. It is the staff's recommendation that the authorization be given for participation in this meeting. -2- 7 No. 8-i -Authorization for Execution of Specified Documents. From time to time, we are required to submit proof that the General Manager has authority to execute documents on behalf of the Districts. The resolution appearing in the agenda specifying this authorization has been prepared by the General Counsel. It is our recommendation that the resolution be approved. No. 9-j -Authorizing Payment of Overtime .for Supervisory Accounting Personnel. During the past month, key accounting emplo yees have been absent from work due to extended illnesses. This situation has resulted in the need for other accounting personnel to work over- time. Since this particular time of the year ·requires the closing of the books as well as the preparation of the budge ts for the coming year, we are r eque sting a uthority to pay overtime to supervisory personnel to avoid hiring additional people on a temporary basis. This requested authorization will expire September 30th. District No. 1 No. 8-k -Document Maps for Sewer Right-of-Way. The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems within the District. Since the work involved little professional judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order for the work as outlined. ·The fees submitted from the five firms were as follows: (1) $1,091 (2) $2,400 (3) · $4,ooo (4) $9,000 (5) $12,487 The staff had estimated that the cost for these outside services would be approximately $2,000. The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in the amount of $1 ,091. They have indicated that they are completely aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee as sub- mitted. It is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that the proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be accepted. -3- District s Nos . 1 and 7 No. 8 -1 -Environmental Impact Assessment for Rai tt Street Trunk Sewer Construction . The actions appearing on the agenda initiate the preparation of a draft Environmental Impact Report relative to the proposed construc tion of the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer . The trunk will connect to the Districts' Sunfl ower facility and will cost about $1.5 million. This facility is included in the Districts' Master Plans. Distri ct No. 2 No. 8 (m)-(n). Acceptance of Contracts Nos . 2-1 4 -3A and 2-14-4A. The se contr acts were for t h e f urnishing of manho le f r ames and c overs for Contracts Nos . 2 -1 4 -3 and 2-1 4 -4 , which are presently under construction . The supplier has furnished al l of t he mate rial re quired under the contract. The staff rec ommends acceptance of the work and authoriz at ion to file a Notice of Com - pletion. District No . 5 No. 8 -q -Environme n tal Impact Report for Proposed Back Bay Trunk Sewer. . . The actions appearing on the ' agenda relative to the preparation of a ne gative environmental declaration for the construction of th e Back Bay Sewer (east side) is pursuant to the District 's gu idelines implementing the Environmental Qua lity Act of 1970 . Because the area tributary to the sewer is presently 85% developed or approved for development , the staff is recommending the preparation of a negative environmental declaration. No. 8-r -Authorization to Advertise and Receive Bids for Purcha se of 24 -In ch Ducti l e Iron Pipe for Construct i on of t he Back Bay Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 5 -2 0A . The Dis t rict's staff , working with the Department of Fish and Game, have agreed that no construction will be done during t he mi gratory foul breeding and storm seasons, ge nerally October 1 5 to March 1 . In order to construct this facility pr ior to Oct o b er 15 , it is necessary to procure the ductile iron pipe re- quired for this job because of the long lead time required for manufacturing th i s mater i a l. It is anticipated that the con- tract or will commence work on or about August 15th. It is proposed that this pipe be purchased and furnish ed to the -4- -· ~ contractor to meet this tight construction schedule. It is reconnnended that the Board authorize the advertisement and receipt of bids for 8,600 feet of pipe at an engineer's estimate of $250,000. It is recommended that bids for this material be received on July 6th and award be made by the Board at the regular July meeting. District No. 6 No. 8-s -Document Maps for Sewer Right of Way. The staff received proposals from five engineering firms to verify our records pertaining to right of way and the validity of our easement documents relative to all trunk sewer systems within the District. Since the work involved little professional judgment, the staff felt competitive price bidding was in order for the work as outlined. The fees submitted from the five firms were as follows: (1) $1,521 (2) $3,699 (3) $4,000 (4) $7 ,500 (5) $12,487 The staff had estimated that the cost for these putside services would be approximately $2,000. The staff has discussed the scope of work with Governmental Professional Services, the firm that submitted the lowest fee in the amount of $1,521. The firm has indicated that they are com- pletely aware of the scope of work and are confident in their fee as submitted and it is, therefore, the staff's recommendation that the proposal by Governmental Professional Services of Santa Ana be accepted. District No. 7 No. 8-t -Initiation of Proceedings for Proposed Annexation No. 52. The staff has reviewed the proposed annexation of 1.38 acres located at 20202 Amapola Street in the vicinity of Orange Park Boulevard and Amapola. This is an existing single family develop - ment in the City of Orange and it is the staff's recommendat ion that Resolution No. 76-108-7 authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings be approved. No. 9-u -Ordering Annexation No. 49, Tract No. 8306. In October, 1975, the Board authorized the initiation of annexation proceedings for Tract No. 8306 (City of Orange) to annex approximately 11 acres in the vicinity of Santiago Road -5- extending to a point westerly of Santiago Creek. The property will be divided into single family residentia l lots and the wast ewater discharge will be consistent with the flows anticipated b y the District 's Master Plan. We now have received approval from the Local Agency Formation Commission and the proponent has paid the District 's annexation fees. The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No . 76-109-7, ordering annexation. No. 8-v -Acceptance of Sewer Easement. Resolution No . 76-110-7 accepts an easement for a local sewer con structed in a private street in the vicinity of La Colina Drive and Browning Avenue . It is recommended that the ac t ion authorizing acceptance of this easement , at no cost to the District , be approved. No . 8 -w -Acceptance of Sewe r Easement from Lerner Oil Co mpany, Inc., Contract No. 7 -4A. It has been recently discovered that when a subtrunk sewer , Contract No. 7-4A, was constructed through a private right of way be tween El Camino Real and "B" Street in the City of Tustin in 1963, the proper sewer easement was not obtained. The staff and Gen eral Counsel have met with the attorneys for the Oil Company, and it has been mutually agreed that a fair market value for this e asement is $1 ,800. It is, ther efore, recommended that Resolut i on No. 76 -1 11 -7 be approved authorizing acceptance of this easement and payment to Lerner Oil Company , Inc., in the amount of $1 ,800 . Joint Boards Nos. 10 and 11 -Report of the Executive Committee . The Committee met on June 1st and enclosed for the Dir ectors is a written report of their discussions and recommended items for consideration by the Boards . No. 12 -Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. As provided in the Joint Boards ' Rules of Procedure, nominations for these two offices are made at the regular June meeting , with elections to take place at the July regular Joint Board meeting . For the new Directors' information, we have included in the supporting documents section of the agenda material, an excerpt fro m the Rules of Procedure for Meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. No . 13 -Hearing on Proposed Conflict of Interest Code for District Directors and Specified Employees . Pursuant to the Boards' authorization in May , a public hearing is scheduled Wednesday evening on the proposed Conflict of Interest -6- ,_ .,- Code for the County Sanitation Districts. Copies of the Code have been mailed to all Directors and affected employees. As of this date, no written cow.ments have been received . If any Director has any questions concerning the Code's provisions, please call the Districts' General Counsel, Tom Woodruff, (714) 835-6212. No. 14 -Amendment to NASA Contract, JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant Facility. At the April 14th Board meeting, the Board amended the original contract entered into with National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory of California Institute of Technology to provide the necessary services for the design, start-up and o p erational phases of the 1-MGD Pilot Plant Facility from $280,000 to $333,726. There was an apparent oversight of a $20,000 effort made in April and May, 1975, which should have been considered in this revised contract amount. Enclosed in your agenda material is a letter from the Pasadena Office of NASA detailing the oversight by not including this $20,000 effort. It is the staff's recommendation that the amended contract amount with NASA should be adjusted to $353,726. Districts 2,3,5,7,11 No. -15 -Amending Annexation Policies. The staff is recommending that the provisions for payment of the annexation fees be amended to read that the date of payment of annexation fees govern the amount of the fee payable. Currently, the fee is determined as of the date of the formal annexation approval by the Board of Directors. This creates problems, in that, on July 1st of each year, the annexation fee chang es, based on the assets and liabilities of the Districts on that date; there- fore any pending annexations are subject to increases in fees. The recommended change in lang uag e would permit a proponent to pay currently-established fees at the time of application for annexa- tion. The staff recommends the adoption of the amending resolu- tions listed on the agenda. District No. 2 No. 19 -Acquisition of Permanent Easement for Realignment of the Yorba Linda F orce Main. During the course of construction of Contract No. 2-16-2, the Yorba Linda Force Main from Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard, the contractor encountered a large storm drain which interferes with the construction of the sewer as originally proposed. This -7- --______:;i obstruction has forced the realignment of the sewer to a position which requires acquisition of a permanent easement on private prope rty. The staff has negotiated with Calprop Corporation for the required easement and recommends payment in the amount of $7,000 for the right of way . District No . 8 No. 28 -Substitution of South Coast County Water District as a Member Agency of District No . 8 . The General Counsel is r ecommending that the Board adopt Resolution No . 76-112 -8, confirming substitution of the Sout h Coas t County Water District as a member agency of District No. 8 in place of the South Laguna Sanitary District pursuant to the provi s ion s of the Health and Safety Code, Section 4730. This ac tion i s the result of the consolidation of the Sanitary District with the Water District . District No . 7 No. 33 -Request for Annexation -Lazy B Golf Course. The District has r eceived an annexation requ est from the owners of Lazy B Estates , Inc., in the Orange Park Acres area lying betwe e n Randal l Str eet and Amapola Avenue , consisting of approximately 108 acres. The owners have re q u ested that 50 .51 acres of the annexation be exempt from annexati on fees because the areas will not be developed to contribut e any sewage flow to the sanitary sewer system . Th e requested "exemp ted area " will be a golf course, driving r ange and equestrian trail . In 1972, a simil ar request was g rant ed by the District No . 2 Board to the City of Anaheim to exempt a public golf course in the Anaheim Hills area. The exemption agreement prov id ed that in the event any of the exempted land required sewer service, the area to be developed would b e subj ec t to fees equal to then applicable District anne x a tion charges and any other fees that may be in effect at that time. The staff is requesting the Boar d's direction in this matter . Because of the private ownership status of the r equested exempt property, the staff feels this would b e extremely difficult to administer and to coll ect fees due the District if and when the land use would change on any portion of the 50 acres . -8- Fred A. Harper General Manager CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS MAY 3 1 , 1 976 ENGI NEERI NG DEPAR'I'lvIENT CorvcRF·1-c FINISH wo£K, C/\ULK I NG JO f-.flA,p t(-~ ( x ) '<_> q 8 r ' t1:P1.C:1r- R ·co I C Ros~ co t..L.E<;TrOIJ S ys n:: f\'\ ~E" I t-i ~ /l\)STl\1..Lt!:.D. ..5CLIM co t_l.CC.TDKS ) 10.s,-A. u..F...D 2 4 6 8 /0 I Z 14 I 5 4 3 2 I . .c-PUf'·\f-'$ Ai\J D r' />'.-'/) -iiJG /tJ-:;-f.l\LL[ ~ I 3 5 7 9 JI 13 1Et OND AR Y CLAR/FIERS . "-" Pvftli>.s AND H i;::A/ Exe l1MJG(:f:;:. SE1 iJ:; PI F~P 4 ~ AERATI ON BA$1N1 D oool2. p_wD rP.-::iA. p l\tJ ELS. l ~<;;'TP..L Lf'.D POWEK BUILDING 50 __ MG D .ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT C ONTRACT " NO . P1 .~1.6 C.ONTRACT .NO .. P1.-t6 SO MGD ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT Donovan Construction Company of Minnesota, Contractor STARTING DATE: June 27, 1974 $29,876,000.00 $25,779,272.77 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 14' 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 30 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 13, 197T ORIGINAL CONTRACT: PAID TO DATE: Contract is for the construction of Activated Sludge secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. l. The new faci Zities UJi zi aid the Districts in meeting m::r.ndated State and Federal ocean discharge requirements. lJJith Pl.ant No. 2 effluent at the outfal Z booster station, improving the overall quality of water pumped th.i'iough the outfalZ system into the ocean. Significant structures included in the contract are the Blower Building, Aeration Basins, Second- ary CZa.rifiers, °f:;?Jlo Digesters, Waste Sludge Thick- eners and the Poweia Bui Zding. When completed, the secondary trieatment system ll>iZZ process the SO mgd of wastewater flowing tlwough Plant No. 1. The effluent wiZZ then blend ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work in the blower· building has been minimal. The exterior sliding doors have been installed and the interior walk thru door jambs are being set. Work on the Aeration Basins has consisted primarily of concrete finish work including caulking. The sludge collection system is being installed in the Secondary Clarifiers. Handrailjng continues to be installed. Pumps are being placed in the Return Sludge Pump Station. Interior door frames and handrail have been installed in the Waste Sludge Thickeners. Work in the Digester area consists of piping installa- tion in the control building and tunnels. ~~T~·-.. ~~~~~ ~w~~~~__,. I tUu. '---------·· -------' JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT JOB N2.PW-04? ( . , CONTRACT PW~045 .... JPL-ACTS PROCESS PLANT J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation & Henck Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor 'STARTING DATE: Oct. 1, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: ~ PAID TO DATE: x Contract is for construction of a one million gal- lon per dCi.y pilot wastewater treatment pl.ant at flastmJater Treatment PZant /,'o. 2. The pl.ant vi7:l use a unique Activated Carbon Treatment System (ACXS) developed by the Natior.a.l Aeronautics and Space-Agency 's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This tl-eatment method was perfected in its experimental stages 7.Jith a mobile resecwch unit opero.ted by JPL personnel. at the Di,str;~cts' Wasteu:ater Treatment P'lant No. l in Fozmtain VaZ.Zey during 1974-75. & system uses sludge removed from the ZJaStewater to produce activated carbon through a pyrolysis reac!tor. The activated ca:rbon is then reintro- duced into the wastewater stream in a seconclary stage for additional rerrova."L of pol.Zutants. Only . . partia7:ly used after the second stq.ge~ tfie activa- CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 28, 1976 ted carbon and secondary sludge slurry is fed in to the inao'ming 1.Jast~ater stream to increase system efficiency o The mobile experimental wzit used to refine this system from laboratory bench experiments UJas batch operated 7.Jith mechanica"L handlir.g of rrateria"l from stage to stage. The pilot plant wi"Ll be a contin- uous"Ly run, a:r..1.tomated system. As a prime objective of the ACI'S, it could solve an increasing problem of sludge disposal as this TTrLterial, becomes more plentiful with i.--rrproved 7.Jast&,ater treatment and increased flows. In ad- dition, the effluent from this treatment system is e:r:p-eated to meet the discharge requirements of the Districts' N.P~D.E.S. permit • ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Contractor completed final billing with exception of telephone, reproducing machine and office time fo~ last week of May. District staff working with equipment suppliers on correcting problems associ~ted with several pieces of equipment. xa?iis controct is a design and construct contract L.'hcreby the contracto1" i.8 paid $50, 000. 00 p"Lus the actual costs for ai"L labor and materials. IMPER IA '=-I I ...,.I I I I /Ji I Z!2!!£!!&kfi I I I I I ~· WI >a <ea I l<E l L 0 Ge;, DR. I . I I I -rRtNJOAO s.,.. I I I I <ti :El Ja ct:g LAKE VtEW a.I . Fa£ ANA ==:=:::::::::====t===~ RIC.HFIELD I -=====::;======~· o\S1. 2 .. CONTRACT 2 -:-14-3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER 6 SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR, REACHES 2, 3 & 4 John A. Artukovich Sons·, Inc., Contractor ST AR Tl NG DATE : 0 ct . 15, 19 7 5 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $ 3, 814, 4 6 2. 00 PAID TO DATE: $9 30, 384. 00 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Nov. 12, 1977 0 Calendar Days Nov. 12, 1977 Contract calls for the construction of a 3.125 mile reinforced concrete pipe trunk line sewer a- long La Pa Zma Ave. f mm Grove St. to Imperia Z Hwy. in J.naheim. aection of 33" diameter vitrified clay pipe is designed to receive flou;s from the South F;foer Trunk, serving Santa. Ana Canyon. I-li th the comp Zc- tion of the South River Trunk, the Santa Ar.a Can- yon pumping station can be abandoned. !rhc first one-third of the project uses 51" diam- eter pipe, the balance is 48 11• Also included in the contract is a lateral con- necto1' tine to the Santa Ana River Interceptor aystem from 300' north of Santa Ana Canyon Rdo a-· long Impei-ial /JZJJy. to La. Palma Ave. This 2'150' Thie section of the interceptor system is dcsigr.ed to handle up to 35 million gaUons flow per day. Included in this figure is 30 l-lGD allou;ance for accepting future high brine wastewater fl(}U)s from San Bernardino and Riverside Countieso ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Work is progressing very well on this job with the cont~actor laying an average 180 feet of pipe per day. The pipe heading has just passed La Palma ·Avenue and Coronado Avenue. Back-end cleanup on this job is being handled very well, and the City of Anaheim is pleased w~th the progress and traffic handling measures. The contractor laid 2,727 feet of pipe during the month. ' .. PRIVATE RO. WE.1 R CANYON RO. DIST. 2 '!er zz COMP LE'I'E ---..., TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 2 -14.:. 4 CONTRACT 2 -14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER~ REACH 5 Kasler Corporation & L. H. Woods & Sons, Inc., Contractor ' STARTING DATE: Oct. 15, 1975 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $4,240,957.00 PAID TO DATE: $3,475,544.00 Contract is foI' const:ructfon of a 5.1 mile long section of re-z:nf o:rced concrete pipe trunk line sewer from Imperial, Ewy. aZong La Palma Aveo in JJUZheim, traversing the new 101•ba Regional Pcaik to JieiI' Canycn Rd. The Pight-of-way then crosses the Santa hia River at · b.:Jo places as it traverses ~ county terr>itorrzJ through Santa Ana Valley Irriga- 'tion Co. and Bryant Ranch properties to Gypsum Rd. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 1977 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Jan. 7' 19 7 7 Depending or.. design criteria, various sections of this line use 42, 45 and 51 inch diameter pipe. This nection ~'>ill handle flows up to 32 million gal. Zons per dayo Induded in this figure is 30 J.JGD al ZotJance for accepting future high brine wastelJJater flows from San Bernardino arul Riverside Counties. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH The contractor is making good progress on this contract in spite of problems encountered with soil conditions not indicated on the soi~s report. He laid 3,081 feet of pipe during May and has completed pipe laying for all but the two river crossings on the north end of the job. Excessive water caused by soil-conditions has necessitated laying a three to four foot thick rock bed under the pipe joints as they are installed, vs. a normal one foot layer. This condition exists primarily from the upper river crossing to the north end of the job. The contractor will submit a claim for extra work due to these conditions. The concrete foundation pad for encasing the pipe u~der the upper river crossing is complete. Pipe will be installed at this cros~ing during the first week in June, encased, covered over, and the river bed returned to its normal path so excavation can begin under the diversion channel. Simultaneously, the contractor will begin trenching operations at the southern terminus of the job at Imperial Highway and La Palma Avenue during the first week in June. r ~ ..... ~...,_,+.11~ l\.~CO.V#\+~~ . '''"~A.. ---- CONTRACT No. 2-14-5 z 0 U') COAL CANYON RO. GYPSUf'/\ CANYON RD. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. CONTRACT 2-i4-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER REACHES 6, 7 & 8 S. S. Zarubica; Con tractor STARTING DATE: Nov. 27, 1975 ORIGIN.AL CONTRACT: $2, 0 96, 6 76 • 15 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 21, ·1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept• 21, 19 76 . PAID TO DATE: $667, 694. 45 Contract is for the construction of ·a 2. 4 mile Zeng section of reinforced conc-rete pipe Zina seu>- er. The tine goes through the San ta Ar.a Canyon from hlhere Contract No. 2-14-4 ends in about the center of the BriJant Ranch property, along the route of the Santa Ana River and through the no-::•thern portion of the G1 1 een River Golf Course to t=1ie CountlJ Line. The Zine terminates in a controi cmd meterir.g structure designed to measure fl.OWB from the upper basin counties. The line consists of 45, 42, and :59-inch diameter sections of pipe. Th~ diafr.eters ch.aY.~e in rela- tion to design requirc~ents. This cection of the San.ta Ana River Interceptor system will handle flows of approxir.-ately 32 miHion gallons per Wd· Included in this figure is 30 NGD all(}l;)ance for accepting futu:I'e high brine wastewater flows from San Bernar·dino and Riverside Counties. .• ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH The contractor has cleared brush and trees fro~ the right- of-way from the northern most river drossing to the southern terminus of the job and graded an access road for most -of this distance. 250 feet of pipe were l'aid during May. Structural construction is complete on the mete.ring structure, and cleanup work is. proceeding very well. Planning continues with management of the Green River Golf Course for restoration of a tee in the pipe laying right-of-way that was .destroyed during trenching operations and landscaping .and grading along the golf course north boundary. \ An unspecified problem continues to delay installation of electrical service to our contractor on the west side of the ·upstream river crossing for powering dewatering pumps at that location. The contractor has moved downstream to a point opposite the north end of Featherly Regional Park and is dewatering there, using portable generators, in preparation for trenching operations. Trenching should begin during the first week in June. Two power poles in the righ-of-way are scheduled to be moved by Edison Company during the first week in June. These poles are within a short distance of where the c~ntractor has chosen to begin trenching. ' ·o IS T. __ . 2 __ CONTRACT No. 2-15 (\ ~ ~ " () ~ ~ BLVD. ~ ~ tu '4J ~ "' " ~ GAL STATE ~ULLE.RTON ~ CAMPUS ~ L . . CONTRACT No. 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION J. Putnam Hcnck, A Corporation & Hentk Pro, A Joint Venture, Contractor STARTING DATE: Sept. 26, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $671, 146 ." 00 PAID TO DATE: $693, 462. 99 Contract is· for the construction. of a reinforced concrete structure to house wet we Us and pwr.ps for tlunsfe11ring tributaPJ LXJ.stewater though a force rrain Zin~ into· the Santa Ana River, Carbon Caayon Inte11 ceptor-re Uef T2?Unk Line system for - conveycrnce to f·lasteZJater Reclaniation Plant Noo 1 in l:'oudain VaUey. This LJiE assist in relieving the presently congested N~~hope-Placentia Trunk Line and. will serve proposed land use development of the tributary area to the year 2010. The pzgnp station str~cture is located at the in- tersection of Yorba Linda Boul-evard and Assoaio:ted Road in Fullerton. It is being constructed on CONTRACT. COMPLETION DATE: TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 22, 1976 81 Calendar Days Dec. 10, 1976 uhat was originally VniversitlJ of California, Ful- lerton. p11 operty at the northern perimeter of the campus. SpeciaZ arrangements were 17Yl.de u;ith the University for use of the property. The above-ground portion of the structure ZJi ZZ. be a low profile slab 85' x 109 ', 2 feet above ground. Th.e deepest portion of the structure wil:l 'l?e 35 feet wuler the ground. The District has agreed to const1?Uct a sZwnp-stone fence a'!lound the structure and landscape the area in acco11 dance ?Ji.th fu,ture compatible use by the University. The University plans to construct an arboretum in the mediate area at some future date. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Construction and equipment installation is complete. Final testing is· underway. 7 N DIST. 2 I' •c.1. •• CCMPIETE .. ,. -., • 'IO BE CO ~.3'1.'RUCI'ED CONTRACT No. 2-16-2 . . CONTRACT 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED ROAD TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc., Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976, ORIGINAL CONTRACT: _.$660,287.98 PAID TO DATE: $530,907.68 Co;;-t~ct is for construction of a 1. 4 mile sewer fo'I'Ce main of 30-ir.ch ductile iron pipe. This line wiZZ caITY se?Jage pwnped from the Yorba Linda Pump Station at Yorba Lind.a Boulevard and Associ- ated Road in FuUerton to a reach of the Santa Ana · River Tnmk line system at Palm Drive and Kmer::er- Boulevard in Placentia. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Da.ys PROJECT~D COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 This force main and the pump station are designed to relieve the presently eor.gestcd NaJhcpe-PZccen- tia Trunk Line. It wi Zl serve proposed Zand use develop!.nent of the tributary area to the year 2010 •. The force rr.ain is desigr.ed to accept up to 15 mil- lion gaZZons per day flows. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH We reported last month that a pit had been left open at the intersection of Placentia Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard for access to the pipe tunneled under Placentia and grouting operations around that pipe. The contractor did not wish to perform air tests and grouting of the tunnel on the completed portion of the pipe, allowing closing the pit, until the entire line was completed. Work has been shut down on the job at the order of the Supervising ~ngineer· until the contractor complies with orders to perform the requested air testing, and close the pit, which interferes with the business of a gas station on that corner. Tunneling under the freeway was allowed to continue and is now complete. Pipe is being installed. The portion of the line that came in conflict with an 86-inch storm drain in.-Sapphire Road discovered to be inaccurately ·located on the job plans has been redesigned and will be constructed by the contractor at an added cost to the District of $11,761.80. Basically, this will require lowering about two feet to clear the storm drain over a 600 foot portion of the job. ~,~O\\ ~~A \V\4S~\\~"\-\4fl u~~ wo.r JI .... . .. ~ ____:-----d a,, ~1 .o<;. ~ ""°'''--~~ C4'V' ~v e"-t ~ ~ \¥ c,.~~ . ~ ~\\ '~'"' V\ Q*~ ~ -a..\' °'" . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LINCO'C~ . . . AVE IL D ~ OEL CITY OJ: -ANAl-/EIM MOll'f4 ~·· OLINDA ~r.· ~r,1· ; ()RANGE ~ AVE. tl N ~ ~ ROAD CITY or Bl/ENA \.... PA!?K ~ ~ ~ CERll 1 .,,,,..,4': I ". --di AVE ~ . I -- CITY DIST. 3 ... ... .. .. OP-~. P. ,. 4 . ·-. l' . 'I SYRACUSE. CYPRESS --• COMPLETE ll ~ /('A/ELLA I:' AVE. - ..-anll!illlTO BE CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 STARTING DATE: CONTRACT No. 3-20-2 KNOTT INTERCEPTOR, PORTION OF REACH 7 A. G~ Tutor Co., Inc. and N. M. Saliba Co., A Joint Venture, Contractor CONTRACT-COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: March 6, 1975 "$3,876,870.00 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PAID TO DATE: $3,854,643.50 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: March 6, 19 76 Contract is for instaZlation of a Reinf oraed Con- crete Pipe (R. C.P.) sewer Zir.e from a point 1200 feet south of Kate ZZa Avenue on Knott Avenue in Stanton, north on Knott Avenue to Lincoln Avenue in Ana.heim, a distance of 2. 3 miie.<>. P"~pe diame- t.ers are '12" for the first 3, 900 feet, 53" for 6, 900 feet and 66" for the re.rr.ainiri.g 1200 feet of the project. FZows from this reach w-iZ Z dmin in- to Contract 3-20-1 to the south. congested NiZZer-lloZ.der Trunk Sewer ·by intercep- ting fl,ow.s from the nortfa.Jest portion of District J. The southerly terminus of the system is at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and ElZis Avenue in F_ountain Valiey. It wiZl eventually e:ctend to ImperiaZ Avenue in la Habra. This portion of the relief system is designed to hand"le a flow of 68 million gallons per day and fJill. serve the proposed deve"loped Zand use plan in the tributary area to the year 2010. This projeat is a portion of the Knott Interceptor reZief system designed to relieve the presently . ·~ .. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Tunneling under Lincoln Avenue is ccmpleted and pipe is in. Grouting operations are underway. The contractor began excavation for the last 150 feet o~ pipe.north of Lincoln Avenue the first week in June. The paving subcontractor continues to repair bad paving ~nstallation in the area from Ball Road north to Lincoln Avenue. First course paving is in in this area. The City of Anaheim is conducting TV checks of an 8-inch sewer line that was replaced in parallel with installation of the larger pipe. It appears there are cracks, broken joints and settling in portions of the line between Ball Road arid Lincoln Avenue. This will have to be repaired before final paving is installed in that area . CRESC.ENT II AVE. ==================~. LINCOLN l AVE. -.asma=-----~ Am 11:9 ... ___ _ I .... I I l-l.tJ I . LU w a: I l&J er t-1 \-U>I ORANG£ U) AVE • .. I . I -1 > ~~ a ~i 0 0 ' ~! BALL ~ RD. ~ I ·i ! ?ARBON C~EEK --;:-::.: .. Ii · ....... ~ ...... ~--· . :-.......... ~ ... ~ ... .,.·: .... :.-·'.•.). ·;_ ·-· ti I ·-...._; /viY R A i C~ANNEL Av£. ~ MARION I CERRITOS . EXERCISE I TRACK""--_ -,1.--~STABLE$ ~ 1lt I -----.---5.P.R.R. _ ~~11111111! i I! 11111Iii1111111111111~ 11 ARROWHEAD 1. 1 MF=G. CO. I 1 DIST. 3 -mamm.-TO BE CONSTRUCTED _ -__ -:1 KAT£LLA AVE. CONTRACT No. 3-21-2 CONTRACT 3-21-2 WESTSIDE RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PORTION OF REACH 27 AND REACHES 28 AND 29 B & P Const.ruction Company, Contractor. STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $1,177,745.00 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24, 1976 TI ME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PAID TO DATE: $122,214.50 PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Dec. 24' ·1976 ::ontmct is for construction of a 2. 75 mile sec-Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. This system is deDigned to re Zieve the Los Alamitos Sub tmnk, which at p1,esent functions as the rrain sewer for the westside basin. · For the most pcn:•t, this line is currently flo.JJ-Z:ng at or near peak capa.cib::;1. This c:ection is designed to handle flows Hp to 6.32 million gallons per d:i.y ar.d will aerJe pro-b posed land use plans in the tributary to the year · .. -:on of vitrified clay pipe t-y•w-zk line sewer : :;rough the City of. ClJpres s from Kate Ua Avenue in _ :.::; Alamitos to Crescent Avenue in Ia Palma. De-- ~ .:xding on design cri tieria, the pipe line is in · ;..Y'ious sizes from 15" to 30" in diameter. section of line will complete the rra.ster- .. · .. ~::. i~·cstside Re lief Interceptor sewer that be- ::~ ihe Seal Beach Blvd. Pwnping Station at 2010. . ---- ·ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH ' Th~ contractor broke ground and laid 1,003 feet of pipe during May .. The pipe heading is now in the vicinity of Myra Avenue. A jacking pit h~s been .excavated, and the contractor is tunneling under the Carbon Creek Flood Control Channel just north of Myra. The contractor experienced some difficulty in meeting· backfill soil composition and compaction specifications in the early stages of the job. An acceptable blending of sand and native soil was worked out and all material placed in the trench meets specification·requirements. ~. ~ DIST. 7 COMPLETE _ __.tfWALNUT II AVE. IL ~ 8 4( ;z 4 ~ ls.I "' .-= c.J) SPR\N C., I I ST. {l > -' ,,..,. :JJ .it' ......, .. l\ -·::~~~--: ;:·NTER -ST. ti-- DI llc£ARL ST. j~ CHAPlllAN JtDDIAvE. I[ ,.: oo~ 1~01~ . ~ I-< '° :t _. w "71~ z <( _J a.. »•(/) ~ < uJ WA~~\N~TON P;.\ u .. 0 ----TO BE CONSTRUCTED w CONTRACT NO. 7-6 -8 ~ll r=AtR~AVEN AYE. fl 0 ~ .' CONTRACT 7:6-8 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER, PORTION OF REACH 12, REACH 13 1 AND PORTION OF REACH 14 Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: Jan. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $512,892.00 PAID TO DATE: $520, 453 .. 00 Contract is for c.onstructing a 1. '18 mile section of trunk lir.e Dewer of 21 and 27 inch diameter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in the Lerrrm Heights area of Orange. The line begins 1:n the vfoinity of Fairhaven Ave- nue and Esp lar.ade Street, gees north on Esp Zanade Street to Spring Street and east on Spring Street to Santiago Boulevaad. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: July 26, 1976 \ This project is the final portion of the master-- planned Tustin-Orange T2"1mk LiYLe Relief SzJstem. The system provides droiri.age for the central and northern portions of District No. 7. This sectwn is designed to handle flews up to 6. '12 million gallons per day and will serve pm- posed Zand v.se deve fopment of the tributary area to the year 2010. ACTIVJTIES DURING THE PAST MONTH Job complete Project to be recommended for acceptance at the July Board . ' DIST. 7 -... CONTRACT NO. 7-6-9 BONO AVE. WALNUT 1--..:A~V~E~·~-fl-~- SPR\N G (/) w $ w CHAPMAN :r ST. AVE. II cl ~1 <{ l-z <{ CJ) o.C.F'.C.D. -------------------- • .· CONTRACT 7-6-9 TUSTIN-ORANGE TRUNK SEWER PORTION OF REACH 14 AND REACHES 15 AND 16 Sully-Miller Contracting Company, Contractor STARTING DATE: Apr. 29, 1976 ORIGINAL CONTRACT: $295, 826. 40 PAID TO DATE: $36,750.00 This controct is th.e last reach of the m::ister- planned Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer to be construc- ted by the District. It consists of a 1. 5 mi.le section of · vitr>ified clay pipe line varying from · 18 to 21 inches in diameter. Construction wiU begin at Santiago Boulevard and Spring Street in Ora.hge and go north to Santiago Canyon Road, where the project ends. The Zine traverses portions of the City of Grange and un- incorpon:r.ted County area afong its route.· CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 26, 1976 TIME EXTENSIONS GRANTED: 0 Calendar Days PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE: Oct. 26, 1976 This portion of the t:ru.nk sewer will connect into an existing 18" sewer "line nau a.Jned by the City of Orange. The upstr·ea.m system feeding to this point is scheduled to be purcha.sed by the District at a later date. Designed f'louJ for this portion of the trunk line system is 4.65 MGD, and will serve the _proposed developed land use plan in the tributa.ry area to the year 2010. ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST MONTH The contractor broke ground during the in May. He has laid 350 feet of pipe. progressing very well on this job with operations following pipe installation clos~ly. · · last week Work -is backfilling very J : SUMMARY TREATMENT PLANT WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During May DISTRICT TRUNK LINE WORK Total Value Under Contract Total Work to Date Total Work During May TOTAL AMOUNT UNDER ~ONTRACT $31,311,934 26,720,851 1,394,613 $17,402,719 10,330,817 1,348,022 $31,311,943 $17,402,719 $48,714,662 ·r . RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JUNE 9~ 1976 -7:30 P.M. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO, "IN FAVOR OF ------ 29629 Admiral Corporation, Sampling Equipment 29630 Air California, Air Fare, Various Meetings ,9631 All Bearing Service, Inc., Pipe Supplies & Bushings -..iit9632 American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals 29633 V. B. Anderson, Small Tools 29634 Artesia Implements & Parts Co., Equipment Parts 29635 Banning Battery Company, Batteries 29636 Benner Sheet Metal, Inc., Fabricating 29637 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Engine Parts 29368 C & R Reconditioning Company, Engine Repair 29639 C S Company, Engine Parts 29640 Cal-State Seal Company, Seals 29641 Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies 29642 Cam Auto Parts, Truck Parts 29643 Chancellor & Ogden, Inc., Oil Removal 29644 Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware 29645 College Lumber Co., Inc., Building Materials 29646 Compressor Service, Compressor Parts 29647 Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies 29648 Continental Chemical Co., Chlorine 29649 F. B. Cook Corporation, Manhole Repair 29650 Leelon Cory, Employee Mileage 29651 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 29652 Costa Mesa County Water District, Water 29653 Clarence S. Currunings, Employee Mileage. 29654 N. A. D'Arcy Company, Equipment Parts 29655 John M. Deck, Equipment Parts 29656 Derby's Topsoil, Paving Materials 29657 Diamond-Newport Ice Co., Sampling Supplies 29658 Nick Di Benedetto, Employee Mileage 29659 Envirotech-Sparling Division, Strip Charts 29660 Essick Machinery Co., Compressor Parts 29661 Fibre-Glass Evercoat Co., Inc., Protective Coatings 29662 Fischer &'Porter Company, Strip Charts 29663 City of Fountain Valley, Water_ 29664 Edward R. Francis, E-079 Inspection Travel Expense 29665 Larry Fricker Company, Inc., Weed Killer 29666 General Telephone Company 29667 Cindy Geter, Employee Mileage 29668 Graybar Electric Comp~ny, Electric Supplies 29669 Haul-Away Containers, Trash Disposal 29670 Hertz Car Leasing Division, Vehicle Lease 29671 Hightower Metal Products, Hardware 29672 Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies, Rope.& Valves 29673 Huntington Beach Equipment Rentals, Equipment Rental 29674 IDS Corporation, Office Supplies 29675 Irvine Ranch Water District, Water 29676 Karlee Company, Maintenance Supplies 29677 King Bearing, Inc., Hardware & Bearings 29678 Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware 29679 L. A. Liquid Handling Systems, Pwnp 29680 LBWS, Inc. , Welding Supplies ._..,9681 L & N Uniforms Supply Co., Uniform Service 29682 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 29683 Lube Lift Equipment, Oil Tanks "A-1" AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ AMOUNT 392.20 121. so 178.90 4,783.59 169.60 31.80 401.08 368.35. 1,575.67 230.00 238.50 14 7 .13 45. 71 12.21 1,852.18 42.86 236.27 333.67 818. 54 1,548.55 909.88 8.25 22.84 6.00 16.35 34.46 43.46 318. 00 15.90 63.66 35.14 57. 72 163.40 55.32 40.00 200.40 360.40 77.40 54.90 509.65 105.00 743.51 26.50 802.21 37.10 291.92 1. 75 542. 72 299.60 32.44 157.94 67.25 1,110.01 17.85 585.92 "A-1" WARRANT NO. 29684 29685 29686 29687 29688 29689 29690 29691 29692 29693 29694 29695 29696 29697 29698 29699 29700 29701 29702 29703 29704 29705 29706 29707 29708 29709 29710 29711 29712 29713 29714 29715 29716 29717 29718 29719 29720 29721 29722 29723 29724 29725 29726 29727 29728 29729 29730 29731 "A-2" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 IN FAVOR OF McCoy Ford Tractor, Tractor Parts McGraw-Hill Publications Co., Technical Manuals McMaster-Carr Supply Co., Tools Meter Master, Inc., Equipment Repair Mine Safety Appliances Co., Testing Supplies Moltronics Division, Electric Supplies E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers National Chemsearch, Lubricant & Cleaner City of Newport Bea~h, Water Nolex Corporation, Printing Supplies Nu-Day Tools, Tools · Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies Pacific Telephone Company Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Quality Building Supply, Building Materials Quik Spray, Inc., Equipment Parts Regents of University of California, 208 Planning Seminar The Republic Supply Co., Pipe Supplies Rewes-Schock, Contractor 11-lR-1 Ryan Herco, Pipe Supplies & Fabricating Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Testing Supplies The Sherwin Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal-Flash Company, Barricade Rental Southeast Janitorial Service, Janitorial Service Southern Call.fornia Edison Company Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Standard Concrete Materials, Concrete Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil & Gasoline Sterling Art & Engineering Supplies, Drafting Supplies The Suppliers, Tools Thompson-Lacquer Company, Paint Supplies & Equipment Parts Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts & Truck Repair J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Equipment Parts United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United States Equipment, Inc., Compressor Parts Al Ursic, Employee Mileage Valvate Associates, Valve Parts Van Waters & Rogers, Chemicals VWR Scientific, Lab Supplies Varec, Inc., Digester Parts & Freight Kevin Walsh, Employee Mileage John R. Waples, R. S., Odor Consultant Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Donald J. Wright, Employee Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 177.51 20.62 270.1'1 35.~ 63.96 172. 94 2,470.96 620.10 5. 81 502.14 30.62 38.16 318.42 232.83 220.15 231.47 35.00 76.86 7,802.77 412.87 18.55 42.56 42.81 688.33 44.34 205.00 395.00 990.35 183.59 167.80 5,652.73 53.43 1,089.35 957.81 79.24 388.91 32.54 6.28 784.94 10.65 35.51 2,122.36 460.57 217.51 34.26 217.60 2,554.00 20.25 $ 52,577.76 "A-2" WARRANT NO. 29613 29614 ~ 29615 29616 29617 29618 29619 29620 29621 29622 29623 29624 29625 29626 29627 29628 "A-3" JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Belmont Engineering, Retention, PW~045 John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Services, JPL ACTS & Fae. Plan Daily Pilot, Bid Notice E-079 Donovan Construction Co., Contractor Pl-16 E & G Contractors, Retention, PW-046 Eastman, Inc., Office Equipment Elwood H. Fairchild, JPL Consultant Forkert Engineering, Engineering Services, P2-8-8 J. Putnam Henck, Contractor, PW-045 Hoagland Engineering Co., Contract Management, Pl-16 LBWS, Inc., Hydraulic Press & Tools LFE Corporation, Retention, PW-045 Olympic Signs, JPL Signs Southland Helicopter, Aerial Photos Twining Laboratories, Testing Pl-16 F. T. Ziebarth Company, Contractor J-9-2 TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT 8,069.83 5,182.65 17.58 317,318.29 1,284.50 586.18 420.00 492 .11 171,034.73 22,887.36 3,462.95 10,159.00 215.18 160.00 25.00 4,725.00 $ 546,040.36 $ 598,618.12 "A-3" INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF ·29594 29595 29596 29597 29598 29599 29600 29601 29602 29603 29604 John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3 Vido Artukovich, Contractor 2-16-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation, Contractor 2-15 Kasler Corp., & L.H. Woods, JV., Contractor 2-14-4 Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., Contractor 2-14-3A Lowry and Associates, Engineering Services 2-14, 2-15, 2-16-2 S. S. Zarubica, Contractor 2-14-5 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 3-20-2 County of Orange, Compaction Testing 3-20-2 A.G. Tutor Co., Inc 4 N.M. Saliba Co., Contractor ~-20-2 & 3-21-1 DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29605 Simpson-Steppat, Civil Engineering Service Back Bay Trunk Sewer DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29612 Portigal & Hammerton, Legal Services 5-19 AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 159,048.00 226,320.51 257.59 6,033.60 1,004,164.95 1,297.44 40,334.62 277,342.38 1,714,799.09 1,077.00 568.92 187,557.36 $ 189,203.28 $ 6,800.00 270.00 "B II INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 11, 1976 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 29606 State of California, Annexation 46 Processing Fee 29607 29608 29609 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering Corporation, Engineering Services 7-6-8, 7-6-9 Steve Bubalo Construction Company, Contractor 7-6-8 Cou~ty of Orange, Compaction Testing 7-6~8 DISTRICT NO. 11 . ·oPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29610 State of California, Annexation 17 Processing Fee ACCUMULATED ·cAPITAL-.OlITLAY FUND '."\4ARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 29611 Clifford L. Thompson Construction Company, Contractcr 11-4R II c II AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS $ $ $ $ AMOlJNT 180.00 1,940.00 247,565.70 26.08 $ 249 ,53L 78 $ 249, 711. 78 $ 85 .. 00 634.98 719'. 98 II c II J U l l'l 1 IJ 1 .::> l 1\ l \J l u \.., L J\ .l l'l v I I\ J. LI l'l n l L. J J .A. J 1 v JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 29746 29747 29748 29749 29750 29751 29752 29753 29754 29755 29756 29757 29758 29759 29760 29761 29762 29763 29764 29765 29766 29767 29768 29769 29771 29772 29773 29774 29775 29776 29777 29778 29779 29780 29781 29782 29783 29784 29785 29786 29787 29788 29789 29790 29791 29792 29793 29794 29795 29796 29797 29799 "D-1" A-1 Metal Services Corp., Control Panels All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings, Seals & Bushings Aljac Supply Company, Tools American Compressor Company, Compressor Parts American Cyanamid Company, Chemicals Ameron Corrosion Control Division, Cleaner City of Anaheim, Power Af.1SA, Conference Registration Bank of America, Coupon Collection Barnes & Delaney, Conveyor Parts Bassett Office Furniture Co., Office Furniture Belt Repair & Installation, Conveyor Repair Bender Machine, Inc., Compressor Repair Bishop Graphics, Drafting Supplies Bristol Park Medical Group, Inc.> Pre-employment Exams Building News, Inc., Safety & Technical Manuals Cal-State Seal Company, Gasket Material Cal's Cameras, Photo Processing & Supplies Art Carr Transmission, Truck Repair Catco, Inc., JPL Chemicals College Book Company, Technical Manuals Consolidated Electrical Distbrs., Electric Supplies Continental Chemical Company, Chlorine Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Crown Controls, Inc., Controls Culligan Deionized Water Service, Lab Supplie~ Daily Industrial Tools, Tools Diamond Core Drilling Co., Core Drilling Electric Switches, Inc., Electric Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring Fischer & Porter Company, Pwnp Parts Compressor Products Division, Compressor Parts & Repair Frederick Pump & Engineering, Pump Parts General Telephone Company Goldenwest Fertilizer Company, Grit Removal George T. Hall Company, Controls Hendricks GMC, Truck Parts Hollywood Tire of Orange, Truck Tires Howard Supply Company, Pipe Supplies & Valve Repair City of Huntington Beach, Permit Fee ILG Industries, Duct Fan Keenan Pipe & Supply Company, Pipe Supplies L A Truck Equipment, Truck Parts LBWS, Inc., Tools, Welding Supplies & Hardware L & N Uniforms Supply Company, Uniform Service Master Blueprint & Supply, Printing Nalco Chemical Company, Chemicals National Chemsearch, Cleaner National Lumber Supply, Tools a Hardware City of Newport neach, Water Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaner Oxygen Service, Lab Supplies & Equipment Rental AGENDA ITEM tr! -ALL DISTRICTS .. AMOUNT $ 383.r- 47.~ 280.78 74.73 4, 931. 34 59.10 133.04 125.00 16.80 269.09 296. 22 325.15 2,868.60 44.55 78.00 182.17 79.55 94.26 201.50 1, 071. so 31.54 962.83 3,097.10 525.13 234.15 80.00 25.18 170.00 45.58 3,000.00 63.07 495.16 83.06 3,002.30 1,107.00 406. 77 40 •. 67 495.74 187.93 390.00 624.10 92.33 1,171.30 700.99 1,209.49 48.19 1,382.13 373.12 72.04 407.14 503.~ 197.54 "D-1" WARRANT NO. JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976 IN FAVOR OF 29800 29801 29802 ~9803 29804 29805 29806 29807 29808 . 29809 29810 29811 29812 29813 29814 29815 29816 29817 29818 29819 29820 29821 29822 29823 29824 29825 29826 29827 29828 29829 29830 29831 29832 29833 29834 29835 29836 29837 "D-2" Pacific Telephone Company Pickwick Paper Products, Janitorial Supplies Rainbow Disposal Company, Trash Disposal The Republic Supply Company, Pipe Supplies Robbins & Myers, Pump Parts Rockwell International, Calculator Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Sargent Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Scientific Products, Lab Supplies Sears, Roebuck and Company, Tools Southern California Edison Company South Orange Supply, Hardware Speede Speedometer, Truck Parts Standard Oil Company of Calif., Oil The Suppliers, Tools & Hardware T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Parts Bruce Taylor, Employee Mileage · Taylor-Dunn, Equipment Parts Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Retirement System Study Travel Buffs, Air Fare, Various Meetings Truck Auto Supply, Inc., Truck Parts Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline United Parcel Service, Freight-Out United Reprographics, Inc., Industrial Waste Permit Printing United States Elevator Corp., Maintenance Agreement Utilities Supply Company, Tools Valley Towing, Truck Towing Arluss Walters, Employee Mileage Water Pollution Control Federation, Technical Manuals Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Westron Corporation, Electric Supplies Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John M. Wright, Employee Mileage James Wybenga, Employee Mileage Xerox Computer Services, Data Processing Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Service Zodiac Paper Company, Repruduction Supplies County Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 475.70 220.48 64.00 136.42 395.37 28.51 455.22 303.30 301..94 48.65 13,206.63 53.69 6.37 1,281.62 153.59 32.12 66.42 42.43 3,000.00 53.00 495.35 19.27 20.02 288.08 33.00 607.57 30.00 36.30 198.51 233.30 334.08 2,046.00 22.50 35.46 3,422.94 1,310.74 99.87 ... 262.89 $ 62,608.90 "D-2" WARRANT NO. 29739 29740 29741 29742 29743 29744 29745 29837 "D-311 JOINT DISTRICTS CLAIMS PAID MAY 25, 1976 . CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING PUND WARRANTS rN FAVOR OF Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc., Tools J. Putnam Hcnck, Contractor PW-045 Material Handling Supply, Shelving P ~ S Repair Service, Contractor E-079A Pepsi Co. Bldg. Systems, Inc., JPL Office Rent Siernag Systems, Inc., Retention E-076 Utilities Supply Company, Tools NASA-Pasadena Office, JPL Services TOTAL CORF TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF AGENDA ITEM #7 -ALL DISTRICTS AMOUNT $ 340.32 122 468~ 110,900.00 191.86 17,600.00 370.60 170,711.25 $ 300,704.98 $ 363,313.88 "D-3" \,VVI~ I I ;:)f-\1'4 l 11\ I l UI" LJ 1;:) I K J \,,I;:) ur UK/-\l'H.;,C \...UUI'~ I l P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFO~NIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ___ 1 __ ~--~-------~--- CO._,.KACTOR: McCalla Bros. DATE ____ M_ay.__2_6 __ ,_1_9_7_6 ____ _ PUMP Ai~D DRIVE UNITS FOR THE ADDITIONAL PUMPING PACI LITIES JOB: AT THE OCEAi\1 OUfFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, .JOB NO. J-6-lB Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEUUOf) $ 11.,958.92 In accordance with contract provisions, ·the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contr~ct price are hereby appr~ved. ADD: Increase base plate elevation from 22.35' to 24.85' (30") by extension of colunm and shaft. (Required for engine stability due to lack of adequate founda- tion for vibration purposes.) 'Pwo units each $5,641.00 plus 6% sales tax TOTAL ADD ' No time extension this change order. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) ~~l}.(k1}3 Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 Approved: $11,958.92. $11,958.92 $ 345) 000. 00 $ 0.00 $ 11,958.92 $ 356,958.92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF . Orari3e County, California By ·----------~----------~----~~---Associate Engineer By----------------------..-:--~~~~~ Chief Engineer By __________________________________ __ Contractor II E" AGENDA ITEM #3(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II E II II F II RESOLUTION NO. 76-95 APPROVING ADDENDUM TO JOB NO. J-6-lB A JOINT RESOLUTION OF 111E DOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WI1lI MC CALLA BROS. FOR PU~1PS AND DRIVE UNITS FOR ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, JOB NO. J-6-lB, PROVIDING FOR CHANGE IN PROVISIONS FOR PAYMENT OF SALES TAX AND PROGRESS PAYMENTS TO THE CONTRACTOR * * * * * * * * * * * • l The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain addendum, dated , to the ~~~~~~~~~- purchase agreement with McCalla Bros. for Pumps and Drive Units for Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping ~tat ion, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lB; providing for payment of sales tax directly to Mccalla Bros. instead of the State of California, Board of Equalization, and revisi11g .the progress payment provisions of said purchase agreement, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, are hereby authorized and directed to execute· said addendum in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(B) -ALL DISTRICTS II F II II G II RESOLUTION NO. 76-96 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-6-lC AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TIU: BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES FOR 111E ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON I3EACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, Californi~, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Valves a.nd Primer Corporation, has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES FOR IBE ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION, PLANT NO. 2, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. J-6-lC, on May 31, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Job No. J-6-lC, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated August 28, 1975; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8Cc) -ALL DISTRICTS II G II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO·-----------~------ CONTRACTOR: ______ F_le_m_i_n~g~Co_n_s_t_r_u_c_t_io_n __ ~----------------DATE --------------~---------- June 2, 1976 JOB: Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (Dfl'Jj3I5fi $ 13, 600. 22 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or ~ontract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contr~ct price are hereby appr~ved. ADD: 1. Excavate Trench (4100 LF@ 1. 15/LF) 2. Provide 9" Sand Bedding @ 4.00/Ton 3._ Backfill and compact 380 cy@ 5.25/cy 4. ·Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 40 pipe conduit: Ins ta 11 211 160 L F @ 1 • 00 Ins ta 11 3" 160 LF @ 1 • 50 5. Plastic P.V.C. Sch. 80 pipe conduit: Install J.+11 180 LF@ 2.00 $ 4,715.00 911. 12 1,995.00 160.00 2i.o.oo 360.00 6. Open trench install 4" P.V.C. Backfill, compact~" pave trenc~ 1,619.10 7. Supply and instaJl Edison cone. boxes with lids as called for on plan 1200.00 each x 3 3,600.00 Board authorization date: June 9, 1976 By . ----------------~------~--------Consulting Engineer By ----------------------------------Contractor TOTAL ADD $13,600.22 Original Contract Pri.ce $ 141,441.10 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) (~~) $ 13,600.22 Amended Contract Price $ 1 5 5 , 04 1 • 3 2 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California By------------------------~-----Ch i cf Engineer II H" AG END,~ I TEn itS (n) -ALL DI s-r RI CTS II H" II I II RESOLUTION NO. 76-94 AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO SIGN CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FRED A. HARPER, GENERAL MANAGER, TO SIGN ALL CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS NOT OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED BY THE CHAIRMEN OF THE DISTRICTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, during the course of ordinary business on behalf of each and all of the Districts, certain documents and contracts need to be executed by, and on behalf of, the Districts; and, WHEREAS, during the course of these business t~ansactions, the authority of the Boards of Directors by and through the execution of documents by the Chairmen is not required by law or by local rules of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, for convenience to the Districts, its employees, suppliers and contractors, the ordinary course of business is greatly improved by having the General Manager execute necessary documents. NOW, TH~REFORE, the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. That Fred A. Harper, General Manager of the Districts, is hereby authorized to execute any and all documents on behalf of each District or on behalf of the Joint Administrative Organization that are required in the ordinary course and scope of the operations of the Districts. This authority shall not empower the General Manager to execute those contracts or documents which are expressly required by law, contract specifications, or other local rules, to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(1) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II c I ' ' "J-1" June 1, 1976 Mr. Ray .E·. Lewis Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES. FOR THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT :MAPS FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Dear Mr. Lewis: \ve appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser- vices referenced above. The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks as outlined in your letter dated May 11, 1976, is as follows: 1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in your letter. We will prepare that portion of maps 21, 22, 27, 28, 34 and 35 that are within the District 1 boundary. We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on any previously prepared maps with the exception of those streets that are shown on the partially completed map 27. Total man hours required to complete this task is 30. 2. Search of records to acquire required documents -· total man hours:lO. 3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified - total man hours required: 4 4. The number of man hours required for this task is included in Task No. 1. 5. The number of man hours required to compl~te this task is included in Task No. 3. 6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8. Total Man llours = 52 AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1 2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (Bldg. A), Santa Ana, California 92705, 714 547-6375 "J-1" r c· "J-2" Mr. Ray E. Lewis County.Sanitation Districts of Ora~ge County, California -2-· June 1, 1976 The above stated times are assuming that we will be able to secure within a two or three year period, the date that the property was acquired. Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is $1, 091. · Should you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call me. Thank you for your kind consideration. very truly, AGENDA ITEM #8(K) -DISTRICT 1 "J-2" Date: June 3, 1976 ·. Name of Project; Location: Entity or Person .ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Raitt Street Trunk Sewer COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT: of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 lOBH ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714} 5~0-2910 (7)..() 962-2-411 '-' From Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to Myrtle Street Undertaking Project;· Cow1ty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 of Orange County Staff Determination: The District's staff,. having undertaken and completed an initial study- of this project in accordance ~ith Section 31 o~ the Districtls guidelines entitled· "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality, Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaini:ng whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conc:lusion: "K-1" The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a~ EIR will be required, AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-1 11 ~ '. "K-2" INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108..C..C ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 -(71..C) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 . ·, This fonn shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, dated February 15, 1974. Title and L9cation of Proj~ct: Raitt Street Trunk, Sanitation District No. 1 The proposed trunk -extends from Sunflower Avenue along Raitt Street to Myrtle Street Description of Project The trunk will connect to the Sunflower Trunk and will be sized from ·30" to 24" and be 3 1/4 miles long. It will cost about $1.55M and will require R/W acquisition but no relocations. This trunk will relieve the Greenville-Sullivan Trunk and will be growth inducing. GUIDELINES 1. Does the p 0 roposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 25? Yes No x (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form) 2. Does the project qualify as: a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes No x. b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes~-No x c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes~-No x d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 34) Yes~-No x e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30) Yes No x (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.) AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-2" I ' If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following: 3. Initial study procedures A. Evaluating Environmental Sign~ficance (See Section 31) I 1.' Will the project have any significant effect on the environment as per the following: ·, a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have been adopted by the conununity where the project is to be located? Yes No x b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect? Yes No x c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes ~-No x d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident or-migratory fish or wildlife species? e. f. g. h. i. Yes No x Does it breach any published national, state or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? Yes · No x Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas? Yes No x . Does it involve the possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? Yes No x .. Could it . cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation? Yes No x -- Could it expose people or structures to major geologic hazards? Yes No x j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes x No If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail. This trunk has excess capacity and is sized to provide for growth. If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report may be required. 4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown in the "Guidelines Implementing the .California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Amended" "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-3" .... I ~ • 5. If an Environmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in causing preparation of same. The Environmental Impact Report will be prepared by staff of the County Sanitation District No. 1 after the Board of Directors has passed a resolution for its preparation. Evaluation made by . L ~ Signature V 6/3/76 Date "K-4" AGENDA ITEM #8(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 1 & 7 "K-4 11 II L" RESOLUTION NO. 76-105-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF TI1E BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. , has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-3A, on May 31, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' C~ief Engineer has reconunended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(M) -DISTRICT 2 II L" "M" RESOLUTION NO. 76-106-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING .SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, AS COMPLETE * * * * * * * * * * * 'Tile Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Long Beach Iron Works, Inc., has completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MANHOLE COVERS AND FRAMES, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-4A, on May 31, 1976; and, Section 2. That by letter, the Districts' Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 27, 1975; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(N) -DISTRICT 2 "M" Date: June 3, 1976 Name of Project: Location: Entity or Person Undertaking Project: Staff Determination: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) . COUNTY SANITATldN DISTRICT~ of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108-4-4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ""'708 (7J.4) 5'40-2910 ~ (71-4) 962-2-411 Beginning at Coast Highway Trunk at Back Bay Drive and Dunes Park and continuing in Back Bay Drive to Big Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the pump station at Jamboree Road· County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County 1be District's staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study of this project in accordance with Section 31 of the District's guidelines entitled "Local Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended", for the purpose of ascertaining whether.the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conc.lusion: · "N-]" The project could not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a negative delcaration should be prepared. AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-1" p-· INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT! of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 108"'4 ELLIS AVrnUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (71.C) 5-40-2910 (71.C) 962-2.C 11 Tilis fonn shall be completed to comply with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended and as adopted by the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, dated February 15, 1974. Title and Location of Project Back Bay Trunk Sewer, County Sanitation District No. S Beginning at Coast Highway Trunk at Back Bay Drive and Dunes Park and continuing in Back Bay Drive to Big Canyon, thence along the south side of Big Canyon to the pump station at Jamboree Road Description of Project The proposed project is the design and construction of a 24-inch cast iron gravity sewer to replace an existing, at capacity, pump station at Jamboree Road. Development under construction and approved for construction will exceed the capacity of the pump station. The pump station will be fitted with generators and used for emergencies. GUIDELINES 1. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in· Section 25? Yes xx No (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form) 2. Does the project qualify as: "N-2" a. Ministerial (Section 4) Yes b. Emergency (Section 27) Yes~- No xx No xx c. A feasibility or planning study (Section 28) Yes~-No xx d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 34) Yes~-No xx e. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 30) Yes No xx (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared. Complete and certify Exhibit A as set forth in Guidelines Manual.) AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-2 11 •. If there is no affirmative action to Item 2 above, complete the following: 3. Initial study procedures A. Evaluating Environmental Significance (See Section 31) 1. Will the project have any significant effect on the environment as .per the following: ·. a. Is it in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have been adopted by the community where the project is to be located? Yes No xx b. Does it have a substantial and demonstrable aesthetic effect? Yes No xx c. Will it substantially effect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species? Yes Noxx d. Does it cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? Yes No xx e. Does it breach any published national, state or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? Yes No xx f. Will it result in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas? Yes No xx g. Does it involve the_ possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? Yes No xx h. Could it cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation? Yes No xx i. Could it expose people or structures to major geologic hazards? Yes No xx j. Is it likely to generate growth? Yes No xx If the answer is yes to any of the above, describe in detail. Present service area is 85% developed or approved for development. If there is affirmative action on any of the foregoing, an Environmental Impact Report may be required. 4. If there is no significant impact as set forth in Item 3, a through j, a Negative Declaration shall be prepared in accordance with Exhibit C as shown in the "Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of ~ 1970 as Amended" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 "N-3" 5. If an rlnvironmental Impact Report is required, explain below procedures in causing preparation of same. "N-4" AGENDA ITEM #8(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 5 May 25, 1976 Date "N-4" "0-1" June 1, 1976 Mr. Ray E. Lewis Chief En.gineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue GOVERNMENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Joe Rycraw - SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENT MAPS FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 Dear Mr. Lewis: We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal for the ser- vices referenced above. The number of man hours required to complete each of the tasks as outlined in your letter dated May 11, 1976, is as follows: 1. Preparation of maps on 28x41 inch mylar, as specified in your letter. We will prepare that portion of maps 16, 17, 22, 23, 28 and 29 that are within the District 6 boundary. We are assuming that the streets have not been shown on any previously prepared maps. Total man hours required to complete this task is 34. 2. Search of records to acquire required documents -total man hours : 2 6. 3. Indexing and preparation of master listing, as specified - total man hours required: 5. · 4. The number of man hours required for this task is included in Task No. 1. S. The number of man _hours required to complete this task is included in Task No. 3. 6. Miscellaneous man hours: Total of 8. Total Man I-lours = 73. AGENDA ITEM #8(~) -DISTRICT 6 2101 E. 4th Street Suite 200 (l3ldg. A). S<rnta Ana, California 92705. 714 547-6375 "0-1" 11 0-2 11 Mr. Ray E. Lewis County Sanitation Districts of Or~~gc County, California -2-June 1, 197 6 The above stated times are assuming that we will be able to secure within a two or three year period, the date that the property was acquired. Our fee for providing this service on a lump sum basis is $1,521 .. Should you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call me. Thank you for your kind consideration. very truly, AGENDA ITEN #8Cs) -DISTRICT 6 "0-2" II P" RESOLUTION NO. 76-110-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES RE OFFSITE SEWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTf\NCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LA COLINA ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, IN CONNECTION WITH OFFSITE SEWER LINE SOUTHWESTERLY OF INTER- SECTION OF LA COLINA DRIVE AND RED HILL AVENUE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 10, 1976, wherein an easement in the vicinity southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue for offsite sewer service is granted to County Sanitation Distri~t No. 7, is hereby accepted from La Colina ,Associates, a California Limited Partnership; and Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to the District; and Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in th~ Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8Cv) -DISTRICT 7 II P" II Q" RESOLUTION NO. 76-111-7 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT Fr~OM LERNEH OIL COMPANY AND AlJTllOlU Z T NG EXECUTION OF J\Cl~EE~lENT ifElTASEMENT RELATIVE TO CONTHJ\CT NO. 7-3A-4A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOHNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM LERNER OIL COMPANY, INC., AND AUlliORIZING EXECU- TION OF AGREEMENT RE SAID EASHIENT RELATIVE TO CONTRACT NO. 7-3A-4A * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated ~~~~~~~~~ wherein property for sanitary sewer purposes is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby accepted from Lerner Oil Company, Inc.; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said Grant of Easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on. Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is granted in connection with operation of Sub-Trunk Sewers, Contract No. 7-3A-4A, in the vicinity of El Camino Real and the Santa Ana Freeway, in the City of Tustin; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California; and, Section S. That the certain Agreement dated , by and ~~~~~~~~~- between County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County and Lerner Oil Company, Inc., relative to said easement, is hereby approved; and, Section 6. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 7. That payment in the amount of $1,800.00 to Lerner Oil Company, Inc. provided in said Agreement and Grant of Easement, is hereby authorized. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #8(w) -DISTRICT 7 "Q" <EXCERPTED FROM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS) 8. CF.AIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION -A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administra- tive Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of ~ach year. The Chairman and Vice ·Chairman shall serve at the.pleasure of the majority of the Districts. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. These statements shall be mailed to the members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. II R" AGENDA ITEM #12 -ALL DISTRICTS II R" II~ II v ,• RESOLUTION NO. 76-99 ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF lliE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, S , 6, 7, 8 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE * * * * * * * * * * * Tiie Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That that Code entitled "Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County", a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted for the Districts, subject to the approval .thereof by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange; and, Section 2. That the Secretary of the Districts be, and is hereby, authorized and instructed to submit a copy of such Code to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and to request said Board of Supervisors to approve said Code in accordance with Government Code Section 87303. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #13(G) -ALL DISTRICTS II S" ,. . "T-1" REPLY TO ATIN OF: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA PASADENA OFFICE PASADENA, CAl.lroRNIA 91103 HN-l(DEB) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Gentlemen: May 25, 1976 ., Subject: CSDOC/NASA Contract for the JPL Activated Carbon Treatment Process Reference is made to our meeting of May 19, 1976, pertaining to an apparent $20,000.00 discrepancy. For this reason, the following is submitted: In an updated letter from the State Water Resources Control Board issued between May 3 and May 28 (attached), a two-month predesign phase effort was approved. The JPL eff6rt was limited to $20,000, to investigate the "best.reactor with the basis for choosing this reactor and available reactor sizes specifically delineated." An experimental-test program was specifically required to meet this requirement. This approval was followed by a March 28 letter (attached) req~esting JPL to commence efforts immediately. This letter was followed by a Purchase Order No. 28284 authorizing JPL to proceed in accordance with t11e March 28 letter. Reference is made in this purchase order to our proposal and "the agreement." A subsequent modification to this purchase order was made to make NASA the vendor, JPL participated in the described predesign phase, and expended over $32,000 in those two months. On June 20, the St&te Water Resources Control Board authorized contin- uation of the project. On June 24 a draft contract was received from CSDOC for $280,000. Figure 1 of this contract (attached) described expenditures by month with a cumulative total of $259,500. The mis- understanding appears at this point. JPL assumed the $20,500 to be available for contractual change in scope. This misunderstanding did not come to light until later. In the meantime, JPL was following the plan of Figure 1 month by month. AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" .. ·. "T-2" 2 In January 1976, by telecon, Ray Lewis asked JPL to take a greater ~ole in the operations. This expanded effort was begun in February with a request for additional funding forwarded to CSDOC on March 4. The additional ·effort requested by CSDOC amounted to $74,226. Instead of requesting this amount, we deducted what we thought was the $20,500 for scope change. At this point, the misunderstanding came to light. It should be pointed out that there has been no misunderstanding of the work to be accomplished. JPL did the $20,000 effort in April/May, followed the contractual effort as described in Figure 1, and provided the additional effort as requested by CSDOC starting in February. Any error, if we take CSDOC position, is only that we should have requested $74,226 instead of $53,726. Our position remains that we received a Purchase Order in the amount of $20,000.00 and a Contract in the amount of $280,000.00 for a total effort of $300,000.00. Our Task Order to JPL, which was provided to CSDOC, indicated a total of $300,000.00. Subsequently, we have accepted Amendment No. 1 to the contract, increasing the effort by $53,726.00 for a new total of $353,726.00. Since Amendment No. 1 to the Contract reads "up to a maximum total cost of $333,726.00", our amended Task Order to JPL will have to be limited to this amount. It is, therefore, requested that immediate action be initiated to increase the contract total authorized by $20,000.00 to enable JPL to complete this effort. Sincerely, ~,_t_O"f~ Edward F. Morris, Chief Contract Placement Branch AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" II u II RESOLUTION NO. 76-98 AUTIIORIZING AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH NASA RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS A RESOLUTION OF TiiE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTI-IORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO TIIE CONTRACT WITH NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION RE JPL-ACTS PROCESS FOR ADDITIONAL PRE-DESIGN WORK * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain amendment dated , to the ~~~~----~------- contract by and between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and County Sanitation District No. 1, authorizing increase in the maximum amount for services from $333,726.00 to $353,726.00 for additional pre-design work, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. TI1at the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1976. AGENDA ITEM #14(B) -ALL DISTRICTS II u II ·. .. LAW OF"F"ICES RICtiARD 0. FRAZE£ STEPHEN C.ST£WART THOMAS L. WOODRUFF .JEFF'REY A. HARTMAN IOSS NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE IOZO SANTA ANA, CALIF"ORNIA 92701 AREA coot 714 835-6ZI=! "V" June 3, 1976 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 8 Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Catifornia 92708 The Resolution presented to your board for action at this agenda is simply to ratify and confirm the fact that Re- organization No. 31 between the South Coast County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District has been accomplished and meets all legal requirements as contained in Heal th and Safety Code Section 4 730, ·to enable to Water District, as the successor agency, to have a member on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 8~ South Coast County Water District, as a successor agency, and having met the requirements of the County Sanitation District Act with regard to membership, will be the only Water District with rights of membership in the County Sanitation District. This is based solely on the fact of the merger between the two districts and the fact that the special State Legislation was enacted to enable South Coast County Water District to continue its rights of membership. TLW:mp Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "V" RESOLUTION NO. 76-112-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 8 CONFIRMING THE SUBSTITUTION OF SOUTH COAST COUN'IY WATER DISTRICT AS A MEI'<IDER AGENCY OF THE DISTRICT IN PLACE OF SOUTH LAGUNA SANITARY DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730 WHEREAS, South Laguna Sanitary District is a member agency of County Sanitation District No. 8 and a member agency of the Joint Administrative Organization; and, WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District, a public agency organized pursuant to the provisions of the County Water District Act, has accomplished a reorganization with South Laguna Sanitary District, a public agency organized pursuant to the Sanitary Dis- trict Act of 1923; and, WHEREAS, the merger of South Coast County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District has the effect of the dissolution of South Laguna Sanitary District with the South Coast county Water District assuming all rights, duties and responsibilities together with the assumption of all assets and liabilities of the Sanitary District; and, WHEREAS, South Coast County Water District will now provide, through an improvement district, all of the same services formerly provided by South Laguna Sanitary District; and, WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 4730, of the County Sanitation District Act, has recently been runended, in furtherance of the accomplishment of the reorganization between South Coast County Water District and South Lag·una Sanitary District to expressly provide for the special condition wherein a County Water District which is wholly or partly in the Sanitation Dis- "W-1" AGENDA ITEN #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-1" r ... trict and which on or before July l, 1977, has assumed the responsibilities, rights, duties assets, liabilities and obligations of a Sanitary District, which at the time of such assumption had representation on the Board of Directors of the Sanitation District, would be included in the membership on the Board of Directors of the Sanitation District; and, WHEREAS, the reorganization between South Coast County Water District and South Laguna Sanitary District has satisfied all legal requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 to enable it to have a member on the County Sanitation District No. 8 Board of Directors; and, WHEREAS, the reorganization of South Coast County Water Dis- trict and South Laguna Sanitary District has been approved by the voters at a special election: NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD. OF DIRECTORS DOES HEREBY FIND, DECLARE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section. 1. That South Coast County Water District, meets all legal requirements as contained in Health and Safety Code Section 4730 to entitle it to membership on the Board of Directors of this district. Section 2. This Board of Directors confirms and hereby grants the South Coast County Water District membership on County Sani- tation District No. 8 in accordance with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1976. "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 8 "W-2" l t . ; i ,· ·/ "X" May 19, 1976 County·Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Sirs: ' . : We, the ownership of the 107.876 acres, hereby request annexa- tion to ·the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. A legal- description. is attached describing the boundary of this proposed annexation, as well as a description of certain parcels within said boundary. Certain parcels are designated by letter and the others by a number. The reasoning for these parcels being designated within the boundary of the proposed annexation is that we are requesting to be relieved frora payment of the annexation fees on a temporary basis-Relief from payment of fees is requested for Parcels A, B and C, which are equestrian trails and are designated as such on the City of Orange Trail System. Parcel F is a driving range for the Lazy B Golf Course and Ridgeline Racquet Club. Parcels 1 and D are the Lazy B Golf Course itself. The balance of the property; i.e., Parcels E and 2, consisting of 570373 acres, is proposed to be subject to the usual annexation fees. The:r.efore, we are hereby requesting that relief from payment of annexation fees be· given on the parcels described due to the type of land use involved. If and when development occurs on any of said parc~ls, it is understood that the proper fees would be due and payable at that time.· It is our intent, however, that the golf course and driving range become an economic unit, remain undeveloped and never become a contributor to the sewage disposal prob.lem. Ownership of all of the parcels are by the same· persons and in the same proportions: Lazy B Golf Course, a Partnership, and Ridgeline Ranch, etc. is owned by Lazy B Estates, Inc., a Corporation. There are no residents on the property and, therefore, no voters. Attachment .: ~~ely, /~-/~ Norman Brock 10604 MEADS AVENUE • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92669 • {714) 633-4710 • (714) 633-9500 AGENDA ITEM #33(A) -DISTRICT 7 ~ "X" '•, '-"" AGENDA ITEM NO. 8(f) May 26, 1976 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County! California COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT5 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 106.U ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706 1714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1976 Transmitted herewith is the regular quarterly summary financial report for the nine months ended March 31, 1976, pursuant to the Boards' policy directive of June 14, 1972. ·The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the first nine months of the 1975-76 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1975-76 budgets for all Districts is $98.9 million, of which approximately 82% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions. The average percents of budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are as follows: Budgeted Revenue Tax Revenue Federal & State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Revenues Carry-over from Accumulated Construction Reserves Average Percent of Total Budget 1974-75 1975-76 19% 19% 22 15 2 2 6 11 -2.!_ -2.L 100% 100% Average Percent of Budgeted Expenditures Total Bud9et 1914-75 1975-76 District Facilities Expansion and Reserves 44% 45% Joint Works Expansion and Reserves 41 37 Debt Service 4 4 Share of Joint Operations 5 5 District Operations, Maintenance, and Other 6 _9_ 100% 100% Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects, and respective share of the joint works expansion. Separate staff reports relative to the current status on individual construction projects are included each month with the agenda material for the Joint Board meeting. Except for inventory control, the EDP system has been fully implemented. The inventory system is being phased in conjunction with the move to our new warehouse and establishment of revised warehousing and purchasing procedures which we expect to complete in the near future. The staff is· undertaking a review of the on-I ine ·computer system to assure maximum utilization of its capabilities, consistent with cost effectiveness. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district transactions for fiscal '75-76 which were accrued in 1974-75 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. If you have any questions concerning the material, I would be pleased to discuss them with you at your convenience. Expenditures of all 34 funds of the several Districts will be maintained well within their respective 1975-76 total budget allocations. However, because of developments which could not be anticipated when budgets were approved, budget transfers in certain categories will be necessary. The budget transfers which are more fully described in this report, and sununarized on the last page, are recommended. -. CASH INVESTMENTS Earned interest of approximately $2.4 million from our continuing program of investing reserve fu1,Ps (primarily'-' capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) has accru~~ during thc~first nine months of fiscal 1975-76. As of March 31st, approximately 96~~ of the Districts' cash funds were i·<'•ested in short-term government securities or time deposits as shown below. The balance of cash on hand was earr,ing interest in corm1ingled investments with the County Treasurer's office. Amount Percent Cash on Hand $ 1,881 ,470 4. 1 Investments in Gov't Securities 44,545,738 ~ Total (Al 1 Districts) $46,427,208. 100.0% JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operation, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the DistriGts 1 jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities. Salaries and Wages -As previously reported, funds were not included in the budget for salary increases granted by the Boards pursuant to agreements with employee groups. However, because of payroll savings resulting from unfilled positions, the increases will be funded from current year payroll savings and expenses will be maintained well within the budget allocation. Employees' Benefits -Includes Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Medical Insurance, and Uniforms, all of which will be within the budget allocation. Gasoline, Oil, and Fuel -As the Directors are aware, significant cost increases in petroleum products have been experienced. The Districts' have a cooperative purchasing arrangement for gasoline and diesel fuel with the County of Orange. Barring further increases, the budget allocation should suffice. Insurance -Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment which is generally during the first quarter. It is becoming increasingly difficult to place this coverage beGause of the reluctance of carriers to insure governmental agencies. Premiums have doubled in the past two years and we expect them to continue to rise. Budget allocation \olill be tight but should be adequate. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals -Primarily for odor control at treatment plant sites. Our chlorine contract expired in December and although last year's chlorine unit costs increased 55%, the new unit price bid was down and expenditures this·year should therefor be less than anticipated. Chemical Coagulants -The staff has been able to temporarily change the mode of operation which has precluded the necessity of using chemicals at the rate originally anticipated and yet enable the Districts to meet the current enforced discharge regulations. Additionally, we have been able to obtain improved quality chemicals at lower cost which has reduced the cost. Needless to say, there will be funds to carryover and apply to next year's budget requirements. Contractual Services -Expenditures to date are for sludge hauling and EDP services. Because of esca- lating costs and increasing volumes, the Boards were previously advised that a budget transfer for this account might be necessary. However, at this time it appears as if the allocation will be sufficient. Professional Services -Includes cost of General Counsel's fees and audit fees paid through March 31st. Funds for work on revenue program will be carried over to next year. Printing and Publications -Reproduction policies have been changed to m1n1m1ze costs. However, con- tinuing demand by the public for information on District activities, coupled with increased volume and 11 paper work" required by other agencies and spiraling costs keep this item on the uptrend. As previously reported, a budget transfer for this account in the amount of $1,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is desired in the event it is necessary. Rents and Leases -Equipment -Primarily for the rental of large equipment necessary for removing and replacing equipment and other necessary work during the course of maintenance and repair operations. Repairs and Maintenance -Parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item, however, absent major equipment failures, the current year allocation will not be exceeded. Research and Monitoring -Annual share of participation in Southern California Coastal Water Research ~ Project has been paid, and expense to date includes estimated allocations for the first nine months of 1975-76. Because our auditors have now determined that certain cost associated with the evaluation of the JPL-ACTS project originally thought payable from the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund should be paid from Joint Operating Funds, a budget transfer of $2,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is recom- mended. -2- Utilities -The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power, which has increased substantially due to the increase of petroleum cost to the electrical utilities. A portion is from rising demand as flows increase and new facilities are placed into service. Prices have stabilized during the past year after a rapid escalation when oil prices increased substantially, and thus consider- able carryover funds will be available for next year. Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere. Major item in this account is freight-in. During the year it was n~cessary to obtain a large shipment of chemicals from the Mid-west urgently needed for our solids handling operation. This material is generally available on the West Coast. Because of this, our freight expenditures for the current year will be higher than normal and a transfer of $4,000 from the Chemical Coagulants Account is, therefor, recommended. Prior Year's Expense -This account represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expa~ding and improving the Districts' presently-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 41% of each individual District's budget requirements for 1975-76. During the first nine months, $12.5 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities expansion, primarily on the $32.5 million 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment FacilitJes at Treatment Plant No. 1, approxi- mately 84% of which will be grant funded. The share of joint works expansion costs are reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the seven Districts and include each ·respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes -Approximately 61% of the budgeted property taxes for 1975-76 have been received through March 31st. Federal and State Construction Grants -Construction Grant funds received during the period amount to $9.9 million, all on the 46 MGD Activated Sludge project. Presently, State and Federal agencies will fund 87-1/2% of ''approve~' treatment projects. However, these agencies have advised that payments will be limited to Boz of the grant amount until an acceptable revenue program is adopted. The staff has previously advised the Directors that our revenue program, even though it has been used as a 11 model 11 by the State, is unacceptable because it includes ad valorem taxes for operation, maintenance 'and capital recovery charges. The Boards are aware that our Districts, along with other large sewering agencies across the nation, are vigorously supporting HR 9560 which would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow ad valorem taxes, and result in a substantial overhead cost savings to the Districts' taxpayers. Passage of the amendment appears somewhat in doubt at this time and it will therefor be necessary for the Boards to consider adoption of a program implementing 11 user charges''. to assure receipt of the full grant allocation. Prohibition of ad valorem taxes will also have a substantial affect on long-range funding programs of the Districts. Connection Fees -Districts 5 and 7 have had connection charges for several years. Connection fees became effective in Districts 2 and 3 on October 1, 1973. District 5 revenues have dropped off considerably (only 23% of last year's budget was received) and collections this year are running behind budget. District 7 fees have also decreased substantially over the past two years. District 2 and District 3 are about as projected; however, some cities are not remitting fees to the District on schedule and therefor receipts compared to budget may be misleading. Further, the budgets for these two Districts are approximately 54% and 25% respectively, of the original annual forecast made by the financial consultant. Other Revenue -Except as footnooted, consists primarily of interest income, various fees, and sale of capacity rights. District Construction -Represents expenditures on Districts' Master Plan construction program of trunk sewers. The average 1975-76 budget for this item is 45% for the seven Districts. However, this average is influenced by the major programs of Districts 2 and 3. Itemization of each project is included on the lower portion of each District's financial statement. The total expenditures for the seven Districts during the three quarters was $12,998,733. District 7 1 s Facilities Revolving Fund budget reflected pro- jected receipts of approximately $1. 1 million from the Cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District pursuant to proposed amendments to the agreements with those agencies for the collection of connection fees. Because terms of the amendments have not yet been worked out, these funds have not been received, and it is therefor necessary to request that the authorized transfer of funds from the District 7 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACO) to the Facilities Revolving Fund be increased from $483,000 to $983,000 to be allocated from the ACO Fund's Facilities Improvements and Reserve Account. Share of Joint Works Construction -Represents Districts' share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion. Discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense -Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $2.3 mil lion. Share of Joint Operating -Represents Districts' share of operating and maintaining jointly-owned treat- ment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (sec Joint Operating Fund statement for details). -3- . --.- Dl~trict Operating and Other Expenditures -Consists primarily of Individual Districts' general op~r~ting expenses and operation, maintenance, and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. District 7 should transfer $200 to their Memberships account to cover increased proportional share of AMSA and CASA"-"' dues. Last November the Boards adopted a policy with regard to uncol lectable accounts. Pursuant -to this new policy, it is necessary to make the transfers indicated to provide for bad debts authorized for~write-off. JOINT OPERATING FUND From the Account Chemical Coagulants To the Account Printing & Publications Research & Monitoring Other Expenses Amount $1,000 2,000 4,000 $7,000 Dist. No. Fund Oper 3 Oper 3 ACO 7 Oper 7 ACO 11 ACO DISTRICT FUNDS From the Account Unappropriated Reserve Un.appropriated Reserve Facilties Ext. Reserve Unappropriated Reserve Facilities Ext. Reserve Facilities Ext. Reserve J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance -it- To the Account Uncollectable Accounts Uncollectable Accounts Un co 11 ec tab 1 e Accounts Memberships Transfer to Facil. Rev. Uncollectable Accounts Uncollectable Accounts Amount $ 500 $ 50 $ 50 $ 200 $500, 100 $500,000 100 $500. 100 $ 100 -.-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING BUDGET REVIEW 9 Months Ended 3-31-76 REMJ\INING BUDGE'l.1 1975-76 YEAR TO DA'ffi J~UDGET S!1LARTE8, 1-ll!GES & BENZ~PITS Salaries & Wageo Employee Benefits .Sub-totol Payroll Less: Chargebacks to Dists & CORF Net Joint Operating Payroll MA'J.1ERIAL8,, 8l!PPLIE8 & SERVICE'S Gasoline, Oil & Fuel Insurance Office Expense Operating Expense Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals Chemical Coagulants Other Operating Supplies Contractual Services Professional Services Printing & Publications Rents & Leases--Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Research & Monitoring Travel, Meeting & Training Uti.li ties Other Expenses Prior Years Expenses Total Material & Supplies TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE Ler.s: Revenues NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE G.4LLON.4GE CliARGE'S 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 FLOW IN MILLION GALS 5,381 MG J..S,232 15,970 2' ~/17 i;n4 3,039 3,389 48,442 MG -------- 3,205,665 2,063,770 1,141,895 609,161 346,165 262,996 3,814,826 2, 409., 935 1,404,891 12100 z 000 764z313 335,687 2, 714 ,826 1,645,622 1,069,204 60,000 32,544 27,456 45,000 39,822 5,178 25,000 i4,806 10,194 187,000 91,il24 95,876 320,000 53,139 266,861 127,000 52,401 74,599 88,000 56,402 31,598 74,000 25,164 48,836 30,000 22,514 7,486 26,000 12,949 13,051 325,000 220,995 104,005 154,500 110' 834 43,666 17,000 9,517 7,483 870,000 389,495 4?0,505 19,000 14,852 4,148 20,000 14,464 5)536 2,387,500 1,161,022 1,226,478 5' 102' 3L.'6 2,806,644 2,295,682 250,000 228,496 21,504 4,852,326 2,578,148 2,274,178 GALLONAGE CHARGE 286,384 810,667 849,945 144,602 144,443 161,740 180,367 2,578,148 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW """" Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 4,608,259 1,215,590 749,192 1,412,000 941,702 37,000 27 ., 377 335,457 238,279 6,564,809 1,985,000 -0- 4,434,738 1,186,074 93,888(1) 87,456 590,566 285,691 63,350(1) 21,557 ------ 1,580,778 4,984,031 FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS: Dyer Road Trunk Improv~ments Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY~ PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facillties Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 4 1,766,368 21,657 4,241,700 11,593 13,709 5,660,552 11 ' 715 ·, 5 8 3 1975-7-6 Additions 1,186,074 1,186,074 (i) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 466,398 .4 7 0' 298 9,623 97,178 1,985,000 3,248,664 6,432 304,875 41,793 Balance 3-31-76 4 2,952,442 21,657 4,241,700 11,593 13,7 "9 5,660,~2 12,901,657 • i... .. • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 5,264,912 4,442,000 829,000 7,415,808 19,268,424 10,657,644 553,982(1) 1,523~173 217,700(1) FACILITIES· EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Santa Ana River Interceptor Projects Yorba Linda Pump Station Carbon Canyon Interceptors Kraemer Interceptor Carbon Canyon -Palm Drive Intercepotr Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative · Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities . Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 251,431 324,094 1,600,596 155,135 1,410,689 48,768 3,790,713 5,554,102 315,333 24,729,699 1,186 33,172 33,582 17,798,828 52,256,615 13,915,782 3,198,730 2,961,053 662,984 3,415,234 24,153,783 4,020,067 3,729,445 510,566 808,633 129,652 9,198,363 14,955,420 197 5-7-6 Additions 2,799,448 444,493 3,971 474,096 35,379 262,680 4,020,067 3,729,445 2,066,182 1,480,947 166,016 4,000,574 15,248,357 6,928,199 43,416 714,540 88,048 Balance 3-31-76 3,050,879 768,587 1,604,567 629' 2Jl 1,446,068 311,448 7,810,780 9,283,547 315,333 24,729,699 1,186 33,172 33,582 17,798,828 . 7,749,512 60,006,127 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW . . Remainin~ 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 7,1137,449 5,183,000 629,000 1,073,000 18,258,550 8,841,250 776,546(1) 1,664,462 424,300(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Knott Interceptor Projects Imperial Relief Interceptor Westside Relief rnterceptor Projects Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 7,091,769 844,530 131,870 3,685 8,071,854 6,121,797 266·, 131 23,833,572 15,036 28,419 52,006 19,618,078 58,006,893 15,857,645 4,565,819 3,263,708 993,638 699,468 25,380,278 8,213,720 4,110,638 710,928 847,810 169,637 14,052,733 11,327,545 1975-7-6 Additions 6,664,576 376 1,488,273 60,495 8,213,720 4,110,638 ·12,324,358 (1) Exclusive of authorized gene1·al and contingency reserves 2,871,630 1,919,292 (36l~,638) 373,532 10,044,830 4,730,612 65,618 816,652 254,663 Balance 3-31-76 13,756,345 844,906 1, 620' 1_4 3 64,180 16,285,574 10,232,435 266,131 23,833,5·72 15,036 28,419 52,on6 19' 618' ~1 70,331,251 A I . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1,012,092 985,000 65,000 219,497 1,228,798 2,409,119 28,965(1) 297,824 250,920(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN.PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications NIWA Planning . Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 27,981 2,000 1,512 760 32,253 1,232,177 6,231 3,096,885 7,347 7,115 8,946 3,948,667 8,339,621 2,017,349 641,243 656,909 67,450 124,058 3,507,009 11,807 827,377 26,563 144,244 129,476 1,139,467 2,367,542 197 5-7-6 Additions 2,138 410 9,259 11,807 827,377 839,184 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves 370,849 328,091 (2,450) 95,439 1,216,991 1,581,742 2,402 153,580 121,444 Balance 3-31-76 30,119 2,000 1,922 10,019 44,060 2,059,554 6,231 3,096~885 7,347 7,115 8,946 3,948,667 ·9,178,805 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW "-" Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses· District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances> March 31st 632,004 873,000 5,000 133,152 571,000 2,695,137 35,546(1) 302,907 61,340(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Pump Station Modifications Coast Highway Force Main Litigation Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PI.;JLJVT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 7,405 90 274 7,769 1,092,580 562 618,344 2,653 7,394 16,237 3,501,311 5,246,850 2,213,295 386,933 582,486 5,698 116,102 3,304,514 4,631 733,641 32,673 144,082 21,431 936,458 2,368,056 197 5-7-6 Additions 1,264 24 3,343 4,631 733,641 245,071 290,514 (698) 17,050 566,369 1,961,496 2,873 158,825 39,909 Balance 3-31-76 8,669 114 3,617 12' 40,0 1,826,221 562 618,3~4 2,653 7,394 16,?~7 3,501,~l 738,272 . ·5,985,122 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves .. , ' -. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: Taxes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: . District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 2,005,595 1,225,000 156,ooo 1,335,495 3,356,81n 4,921,573 694,061(1) 340,516 245,275(1) FACILITIES EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Tustin-Orange Trunk Prqjects Other Projects Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities Peneral Plant and Administrative Facilities ~quity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 569,167 2,395 571,"562 1,531,845 230,165 16,003,785 10,782 12,Ll40 4,908,993 23,269,572 5,106,557 1,208,184 816,671 168,656 271,732 7,571,800 729,020 1,028,597 476,084 161,319 111,372 2,506,392 5,065,408 197 5-7-6 Additions 729,020 729,020 1,028,597 797,411 408,329 (12,656) 1,063,763 2,627,821 3,892,976 217,977 179,197 133,903 Balance 3-31-76 1,298,187 2,395 1,300,5-82 2,560,442 230,165 16,003,785 10,782 12,41rn 4,908,993 1,757,617 25,027,189 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contingency reserves COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1976 BUDGET REVIEW ;. . ·~ Remaining 1975-76 Budget Year to Date Budget Beginning Fund Balances, July 1st REVENUES: '11axes Federal and State Construction Grants Fees Other Revenues Total Revenue & Beginning Balances EXPENDITURES: District Construction & Reserves Joint Works Construction & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Operating Expenses District Operating & Other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances, March 31st 1,217,106 1,051,000 5,000 L118, 523 2,741,000 3,140,553 94,700(1) 362,878 212,520(1) FACILITIES· EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Slater Ave. Pump Statiop Wet Well Slater Ave. Pump Station Modifications Master Plan Report Share of Joint Works Expansion COMPLETED PROPERTY, PJ,ANT & EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stations Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities .General Plant and Administrative Facilities Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities Total Property Plant & Equipment Balance 6-30-75 52,030 7,698 1,302 61,030 1,314,073 18,711 3,797,881 3,053 19,936 4,211,117 9,425,801 4,328,622 741,794 700,571 16,573 216,046 6,003,606 19,488 882,369 85,938 179,941 72,381 1,240,117 4,763,489 197 5-7-6 Additions 19,467 21 19,488 882,369 901,857 (1) Exclusive of authorized general and contJngency reserves 475,312 350,429 (11,573) 202, irn 2,721,512 2,258,1B4 8,762 182,937 140,139 Balance 3-31-76 52,030 27,165 1,323 80,518 2,196,442 18,711 3,797,881 3,053 19' g-:~6 4,211,'-/ 10,327,658 II BOARDS OF DlnECTons County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE JUNE 9J 1976 -7:30 P.M. Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA THE JOINT CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED THAT ANY DIRECTOR WITH A QUESTION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS OR ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE MEETING. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (5) EACH DISTRICT (6) Consideration of motions approving minutes of the following meetings, as mailed: District 1 May 12, 1976 regular District 2 May 12, 1976 regular District 3 May 12, 1976 regular District 5 May 12, 1976 regular District 6 May 12, 1976 regular District 7 May 12, 1976 regular District 8 April 14, 1976 :regular District 11 May 12, 1976 regular, and June 7, 1976 adjourned ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman: (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (7) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) JOINT OPERATING FUND llD" See page(s) 11 A" and --~--------~~- CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND "D" See page (s) "A" and --~--------~~- DISTRICT NO. 1 NONE DISTRICT NO. 2 See page(s) II B" DISTRICT NO. 3 See page(s) II B" DISTRICT NO. 5 .See page(s) llB" DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE See page(s) II B" DISTRICT NO: 6 NONE DISTRICT NO. 7 See page(s) 11c11 DISTRICT NO. 11 See page(s) "C" (8) ALL DISTRICTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS I 8(A) THROUGH 8( w) All matters plated upon the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall b~ considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calend;fr. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 2) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Chang~ Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pump and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, authorizing an addition of $11,958.92 to the contract with McCalla Bros. to increase base plate elevation. See page "E" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-95, approving Addendum No. 1 to the purchase contract with McCalla Bros. for Pump and Drive Units for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-lB, in form approved by the General Counsel, to provide for payment of sales tax directly to McCalla Bros. instead of the State of California, and amending progress,payment provisions (does not affect total contract price) See page "F" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-96, accepting Tilting Disc Check Valves for the Additional Pumping Facilities at the Ocean Outfall Pumping Station, Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, California, Job No. J-6-lC, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "G" (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Brookhurst Street Improvements in the City of Huntington Beach, Job No. P2-8-8, authorizing an addition of $13,600.22 to the contract with Fleming Construction for trenching and underground vaults in connection with .City of Huntington Beach improvements incorporated into said contract, Districts to be reimbursed by City for said cost. See page "H" (e) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-93, determining prevailing wage rates to be paid by contractors on Districts' construction contracts, as required by State law; and rescinding Resolution No. 75-85 (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file financial report of Director of Finance for nine-month period ending March 31, 1976; and approving reconunended budget transfers (mailed with agenda material) (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, facility inspections, and other functions within the State of California which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses incurred (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to attend and participate in the AMSA Technical Conference on Finance and Management of Wastewater Agencies to be held in Seattle, Washington on July 21-23,. 1976; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 4) -3- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 3) ALL DISTRICTS (continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-94, authorizing Fred A. Harper, General Manager, to sign all contracts and documents not required to be executed by the Chairman of the respective District. See page "I" ~ (j) Consideration of motion granting temporary authority for payment of overtime to Districts' Principal Accountant up to September 30, 1976, due to extended illness of other accounting staff personnel DISTRICT 1 (k) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,091.00. See page "J" DISTRICTS 1 & 7 (1) Considerations of actions relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the· Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "K" (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare draft Environmental Impact Report relative to Raitt Street Trunk Sewer DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-105-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-3A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "L" (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-106-2, accepting Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer,Manhole Covers and Frames, Contract No. 2-14-4A, as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. See page "M" DISTRICT 3 (o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Solomon Shapiro, dated May 20, 1976, in the amount of $50,000.00 in connection with construction of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Reaches 28 & 29, Contract No. 3-21-2, and refer to the contractor and District's liability insurance carrier for appropriate action (p) Consideration of motion to deny leave to file late claim by Karen L. Morton for lack of sufficient showing of excusable neglect relative to a claim in connection with construction of the Knott Interceptor, a Portion of Reach 7, Contract No. 3-20-2, as recommended by the General Counsel (CONSENT CALENDAR continued on page 5) -4- (8) (CONSENT CALENDAR continued from page 4) DISTRICT 5 (q) Consideration of actions relative to Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Environmental Impact Assessment and Initial Study. See page "N" (2) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare negative declaration declaring that the Bay Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side) will not have a significant effect on the environment and directing the filing of notice thereof (r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids for purchase of 24-inch Ductile Pipe for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer (East Side), Contract No. 5-20A DISTRICT 6 (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept proposal of Governmental Professional Services, dated June 1, 1976, for right-of-way document maps and records for the District's trunk sewer facilities, for a lump sum fee of $1,521.00. See page "0" DISTRICT 7 (t) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-108-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex approximately 1.3834 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Street and Handy Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 52 -St. Amand Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) (u) Consideration of Standard Resolution No. 76-109-7, ordering annexation of approximately 11.165 acres to the District in the vicinity between Santiago Canyon Road extended to a point westerly of Santiago Creek (Proposed Annexation No. 49 -Tract No. 8306 to County Sanitation District No. 7) (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-110-7, authorizing acceptance of Grant of Easement from La Colina Associates, a California Limited Partnership, for a permanent easement for offsite sewer service in connection with a sewer line southwesterly of the intersection of La Colina Drive and Red Hill Avenue, at no cost to the District. See page "P" (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-111-7, approving and authorizing execution of agreerrent with Lerner Oil Company, Inc. for right of way in connection with Contract No. 7-3A-4A, Sub-Trunks; authorizing payment in the amount of $1,800.00; and accepting Grant of Easement in connection with said right of way. See page "Q" END OE CONSENT CALENDAR -5- (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from consent calendar, if any (10) ALL DISTRICTS Report cf the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committee's written report (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Staff report on proposed Joint Works Budget: (1) Consideration of motion approving 1976-77 personnel requirements; and adoption of Resolution No. 76-97 amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 75-17 (Copy of resolution in Directors,. meeting folders) (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77 Joint Operating Budget (3) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the 1976-77 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1976, and declaring.that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. ~6-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1976-77 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award purchase order contract to the best bidder for Security Monitoring System, Specification No. PW-054, for an amount not to exceed $13,000 for installation and maintenance for the first year, plus cost of annual maintenance thereafter (c) Consideration of motion approving concept of value engineering procedures relative to the design of 75-MGD Activated Sludge Treatment Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with Federal and State guidelines, to provide cost-effective design of said facility (d) Discussion re amending connection charge ordinances in Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 to permit waiver of all or portion of connection fees under special circumstances. (e) Consideration of motion approving nominations of Frances Wood, Chairman, District No. 3, (member) and Fred A. Harper, General Manager, (alternate) as the Districts' representatives on the Southern California Association of Governments 208 Program Committee (12) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. See page "R" -6- (13) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8 & 11 Hearing on proposed Conflict of Interest Code of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County: (a) Open hearing (b) Report of General Counsel (c) Actions to date: (1) Resolution No. 76-90, setting time and place of hearing adopted on May 12, 1976 by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 (2) Notice (resolution) published May 21, 1976 (Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11) Santa Ana Register (3) Notice published May 28, 1976 (District 8) Daily Pilot (4) Notice of hearing, resolutuion and copy of Code mailed to affected parties on May 28, 1976 or June 1, 1976 (d) Written comments, if any (e) Oral comments, if any (f) Close hearing (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-99 adopting Conflict of Interest Code. See page "S" (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from National Aeronautics and Space Administration, dated May 25, 1976, in connection with JPL-ACTS Pilot Plant facility. See page "T" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 76-98, authorizing amendment to the contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration re JpL-ACTS process, increasing the maximum amount for services from $333,726 to $353,726 for additional pre-design work. See page "U" (15) DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 & 11 Consideration of the following resolutions amending Section 1, Subsection (b), of the annexation policy resolutions of the respective Districts providing for the change indicated below: (a) DISTRICT 2 (b) DISTRICT 3 (c) DISTRICT 5 (d) DISTRICT 7 (e) DISTRICT 11 Delete sentence: Add sentence: Resolution No. 76-100-2 76-101-3 76-102-5 76-103-7 76-104-11 Amending Resolution No. 75-42-2 75-43-3 75-15-5 75-44-7, as amended 75-49-11 "The date of approval by the Board of Directors of the annexation shall govern the amount of the fee per acre hereinaboye established." "The date of payment of annexation acreage fee to the District shall govern the amount of the f ce per acre hereinabove established." -7- (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business a nd communications or supplemental agend a items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business a nd communications or suppleme ntal agenda items, if a ny (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to ad journ (19) DISTRICT 2 . Consideration of Stand a rd Resolution No. 76-1 07 -2, authorizing acceptance of Grnat of Easement from Calprop Corporation for a permanent easemen t in connection with the r ea lignment of Yorba Linda Force Ma in (from Associated Road to Kraemer Boulevard), Contract No . 2-16-2, and authori z i ng paym ent in the amount of $7,000 .00 for said easement . (20) DISTR.ICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of mot ion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 Oth e r business and communications or supplemental agenda items, i f any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agen da items , i f any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion t o ad journ (2 6 ) DISTRIC T 6 Other busines s and communications or supplemental agenda items , if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to a djourn (28 ) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel 's memorandum dated June 3 , 1976; and approving Resolution No. 76 -11 2-8 , confirmi ng the subst itution of South Co as t County Water District as a member agency of the District s in place of South Laguna Sanit ary District pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 473 0 . See pages "V" and "W" (29) DISTR ICT 8 Other business and communic at ions or suppleme nt a l agend a items, if any (30) DISTRICT 8 Con sideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 11 Other business a nd co~uunic a tion s or suppl eme nt a l agenda items, if any -8- .. . .. (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 7 (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Lazy B Estates, Inc. for annexation of approximate ly 107.876 acres of territory to the District in the Orange Park Acres area between Randall Street and Amapola Avenue and refer to staff. See page 11 X" (b) Discussion of Lazy B Estates, Inc. request for waiver of fees for portion of proposed annexation (34) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- ME ET I NG DATE --=-J u=n"°"e~9_,_, -'1=9;...:.7...,.6__ T IM E DISTRICT 1 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3 ,5,6,7,8 and li - (EVANS) ........• GARTHE ..•.•• _; ___ _ (EDGAR) ........ : SHARP ...... _/ ____ _ (DIEDRICH) .•.... BATTIN · ..... _J ____ _ RIMA ........ _J _ ---- DISTRICT 2 (GROOT) ......... WEDAA •. ·n·: •. (HOLLI NDEN). .... SCOTT ... t~. (DIED R ICH) ...... CLARK ..... .. (GARTHE) ••...... EVANS ..... .. (WEDDLE) ........ FOX ......... . (DE JfSUS) ...... HOLT ........ . (THOM) .......... KAYWOOD .... . PERRY ...... . (HOYT) .......... SM ITH ...... . !TIPTON) ........ WINN ....... . WARD) ......... , WOOD ...... .. GRAHAM) •.•••... YOUNG ...•.•. DISTRICT 3· 0.... ~---- -./_ ---- -..;----- ./ ------a_, ./ ------J _./ ____ _ -J ------J ____ _ _/ _____ _ ------ (WARD) .•... .' .... WOOD ........ _• ____ _ (HOLLI NDEN) · · · · SVALSTAD· .. • _J ____ _ (GRAY)·········· BLACKMAN···· ~ ___ . _ (WEDDLE) .... ·· .. COOPER ...... _./ ___ -- (SYLVIA) ........ cox .......... _J ____ _ CULVER······ __ ;_ ---- (GARTHE) ........ EVANS · ...... _;__ _ __ _ (PRIEST) .... ···· FRE SE ·· .. · .. _.;_· ___ _ (THOM)····· .. ··· KAYWOOD ... ··_.; ____ _ (LACAYO) ........ MAC LAIN·· .. _J ____ _ (DAVI s) .. · .. · · · · MEYER .. ··· .. ~ ___ _ OLSON .. ·.... J (WIEDER)-.. · .. ·• PATTINSON .. · ./ == == (DIEDRICH) ...... SC HMIT······ _J ____ _ (YOUN G)······ .. · STEVENS··· .. -"-__ . __ (MILLER) .. ·· .... WEI SHA UPT· .. _.; ____ _ DISTRICT 5 MC INNIS .... _.; ____ _ (DIEDRICH) ...... RILEY ....... _; ____ _ (WILLIAMS) ...... ROGERS ...... _.; ____ _ ·DISTRICT 6 RIMA .. . . .. .. "' (ROGERS) ........ RYCKOFF ..... -./----- (DIEDRICH) ...... BATTIN ...... I ==== DISTRICT 7 lEDGAR) ......... SALTARELLI . J . RO GERS) .... · .. · BARRETT .. 11;-· .; == == SILLS) ......... BURTON .. l.:M.. I DIEDRICH) ... ··· CLARK .. ··•·· -.;----- EVAN S )· .. · .. • .. GARTHE...... v == == GLOCKNER···. w (HOYT) ...... · .. · SMITH···· .. · ___:/.__ == == DISTRICT 11 foIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... _1 ____ _ SHENKMAN ..•. _J ____ _ WIEDER ...... _J ___ . __ _ DISTRICT 8 ED\'JARDS ..... _.! ____ ._ (JOHN SON)) ...... SWEE NEY ..... _fi.-____ _ (DIED RICH ...... RILEY ........ _L ___ _ 6/8176 JOINT BOARDS Sb 4f-' ROGERS~········ BARRETT· .. ·.. ~ r;_ DI EDB ICH) .. · .. ·BATT JN....... ./ .,. GRAY) ........... BLACKMAN .... _!t:::_ _r;._ SILLS) ....... : .. BURTON . .. .. . J J DIEDRICH). ..... CLARK ....... -,---~- WEDDLE).. ....... COOPER ....... .; _.L_ SYLVIA) ......... COX .......... _1 ___ J _ CULVER ....... _I ___ ;_ !GARTHEL ....... EVANS........ .; " WEDDLE) ......... FOX .......... _I ___ .;_ PRIESTL ....... FRESE........ ./ I EVANS) .......... GARTHE....... ./ " GLOCKNER.... flJ c~ · !DE Jf:SUSL ..... HOLT ......... P../ ,,.. THOM) ........... KAYWOOD. ..... -"-__ v _ LACAYO) ......... MAC LA IN.... v " ROGERS).. ....... MC INNIS.... I "' (DAVI s) .......... MEYER........ ft , <r OLSON........ .; ./ (WI EDER) ........ PATTINSON... I .; PERRY........ J I (DIEDRICH) ...... RILEY ........ v " RIMA......... J J (WILLIA~S) ...... ROGERS....... .; .; (ROGERS} ........ RYCKOFF...... I 1 (EDGAR) .......... SALTARELLI .. -,---.; - (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT....... I I (HOLLI ND EN) ..... SCOTT. . . . . . . . ' .; (EDGAR).. ........ SHARP ........ -"'-__ ,, _ SHENKMAN.... .; .; (HOYTL ......... SMITH........ J _L_ (YOUNG) .......... STEVENS ..... _.t ___ ;_ (HOLLINDEN) .•... SVALSTAD •... _, ___ .;_ (GROOT) .......... WEDAA ........ _it_~ (MILLER} ........ WEISHAUPT ... _1 ___ ;_ WIEDER...... J .; !TI PTONL ....... WINN ......... -.;---.;- WARD) ........... WOOD......... " .; GRAHAM} ........ YOUNG ........ _I ___ .;_ OTHERS (!)-i_c,J Nov"' \1vo<IL (JYrY l <;>v " .... HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARK E TAYLOR BROWN 1l WOODRUFF ~ -E-wnm- HOHENER --:;;- HOWARD HUNT J KEITH ~ KENNEY LYNCH MADDO X MARTINSON ---:;r- p I ER SALL STEVENS ~ TRAVERS MEETING DATE June 9, 1976 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 DISTRICT 1 (EVANS). •••••••• GARTHE.. •• • • V ___ _ (EDGAR) ..•••••• ~ SHARP ••.••• ~ __ --- (DIEDRICHi ••••• B/\TTIN······ ~ ---- RIMA········~---- DISTRICT 2 (GROOT). .•.•••.• WEDAA • • • • • • • a_, ~HOLLI NDENL .•• SCOTT ••••••• ~ == == DIEDRICH) .••.•• CLARK .•••••• v GARTHE) •••••.•• EVANS ••.•••• ~ ---- ~WEDDLE) ...•.••• FOX ..••..•••• ~ == == DE Jf:SUS).. •••• HOLT .•.•••••• __lL_ ___ _ THOM) •••••••••• KAYWOOD ••••• -l.L-___ _ PERRY ••••••• _1L. (HOYT) •••••••••• SMITH ••••.. · ~ ---- ~TIPTON) ........ WINN........ 1/ == == WARD) ........... WOOD • • • . • • • • __1L. ___ _ GRAHAM) ••.••••• YOUNG....... 17 ____ . DISTRICT 3· (WARD) ••..•• -•••• WOOD........ v ___ _ (HOLLI NDEN) • · • · SVALSTAD .... ~ __ -- (GRAY)····· .. ••• BLACKMAN···· CV ---· - (WEDDLE)········ COOPER······ V----- (SYLVIA).······· COX·········· V ___ _ CULVER······ . V------ (GARTHE) ... · · · • • EVANS······· V" __ -- (PRIEST).······· FRESE······· V° ---- (THOM)······· .. • KAYWOOD····· v' ---- (LACAYO)········ MAC LAIN···· .._..------ (DAVIS)········· MEYER······· ~ __ -- OLSON • • · • · • • ~ __ -- (WI EDER).······· PATTINSON··· ~ ___ _ (DIEDRICH) •. ··•· SCHMIT······ .,.--___ _ (YOUNG) •.••.••.• STEVENS·····~ ___ _ (MILLER) •.....•• WEISHAUPT··· --JL ___ _ DISTRICT 5 MC INNIS •••. ~ __ -·- (DIEDRICHL •••• RILEY ....•.• ~ ___ _ (WILLIAMS) •••..• ROGERS...... .,,,..,-___ _ · DISTRICT 6 RIMA •••••••• ~ (ROGERS) ..•••.•. RYCKOFF •.••• ~ == == (DIEDRICH>.. •.•• BATTIN...... r/" ___ _ DISTRICT 7 !EDGAR) •.••••.•• SALTARELLI. V ___ ._ ROGERS) •• • .... • BARRETT····· ~ ___ _ SILLS) •.••••.•• BURTON...... ~ ___ _ DIEDRJCH). ·····CLARK .. ••·•• ~ ___ _ EVANS)········· GARTHE • • · • · • ___£_ ___ _ GLOCKNER····-0-____ _ (HOYT)·········· SMITH······· ~ ___ _ DISTRICT 11 (DIEDRICH) ...... SCHMIT ...... ~ ___ _ SHENKMAN .••• ~ ___ _ WIEDER •.•••. ~-·-__ DISTRICT 8 EDWARDS ...•. ~ ____ ._ (JOHNSON)) .•.... SWEENEY ...•• ~ ---- (DIEDRICH ..••.• RILEY .••••••• ~ ---- 6/8176 JOINT BOARDS . ..!J__ ''(~~~~L ROGERS}········ BARRETT-"····· _..&c:::::... V DIEDBICH)······BATTIN······· ~-'&:;­ GRAY) ••••••••••• BLACKMAN •••• ~ __ SILLS) .. ·~ .•• : •. BURTON ..•••• _,L_ ~ DI EDR ICHJ •.•••• CLARK ••.•••• ~ L_ WEDDLE) .•••••••• COOPER •.••••• V" ..JL._ SYLVIAL ••••••• cox.......... v ,,,.,., CULVER •••..•• v ~ ~GARTHEl •.••••••• EVANS........ V ,,,,,,.,,.. WEDDLE .••.••••• FOX ....•••••. ~ ~ PRIEST .••••.••• FRESE. .•.•••• ~ .t:::::::_. EVANS) •••••••••• GARTHE •....•• ~ ~ GLOCKNER •.•• ~ ~ ! DE J~sus) ...... HOLT ...•••••• ~ K_ THOM) ••••...•••• KAYWOOU ••••• ~ ~ LACAYO) .•••••.•• MAC LAIN ••.. ~~ ROGER SL ••••••• MC INNIS ••.• -JL._ ~ __ DAVIS) •••••••.•• MEYER .•.••••• ~~ OLSON .••••••• -L-~ (WI EDER) •••••••• PATTINSON ••• _JC:_ ~ PERRY •••.•••• ~~ (DIEDRICH) •••••. RILEY ....•••• ~ ~. RIMA .••.••••• ~~ :WILLIA~S) ..••• :ROEiERS .••••.• -==-__ ROGERS •••••••• RYCKOFF. ••••• ~ ~ EDGAR) ..•••.•••• SALTARELLI..~ ~ DIEDRICH) ..•••. SCHMIT ..••••• ~ L_ HOLLINDEN) ••••• SCOTT ......•. ~~ EDGAR) .•••••.••. SHARP........ V ....k::::_ SHENKMAN •••• ~ ...JL"__ (HOYT) •••.•••.••• SMITH .••.•••• -.+L-~ (YOUNG) •••..••..• STEVENS ••••• ~ -v':- (HOLLINDEN) ••••• SVALSTAD •••• ~ ~ (GROOT) •.•••••••• WEDAA ..•••••• ~ ~ (MI LLERL .••••.• WE I SHAUPT •.• _L_ v W I EDER • • • • • • --JL:__ ...&£::__ (TIPTONl. ••••••• WINN ••••.•••• ~ ~ (WARD) ••••.•.•••. WOOD .••.••••• _iL__ ...J£::_ (GRAHAML .•...•• YOUNG .••••••• ~ ~ OTHERS HARPER SYLVESTER LEWIS CLARKE TAYLOR BROWN WOODRUFF EWING HOHENER HOWARD HUNT KEITH KENNEY LYNCH MADDOX MARTINSON PIERSALL STEVENS TRAVERS 6/9/76 JOIN1' MEETING Introduced new Directos Pattinson and Shenkman (6a) Report of the Joint Chairman Winn reported that there would -be no Executive Committee meeting this month. Advised that there would be an orientation meeting for Directors on June 16 at 5:30. For new Directors and any that would care to come and for further enlightening. He then commented that all of the Directors had been concerned about increased cost of EIS Facilities Plan from $60,000 to $150,000 plus printing costs. Said he sent letter to Paul DeFalco May 13th giving him and met him at the Newporter Inn to discuss this and he said they would reconsider this. Read basic part of letter. Reported we received letter from Richard Coddington who is the Director of Construction Grants Program of EPA and he made some execuses and said it has not been resolved yet. Read part of that letter. Letter said if Don Winn felt a meeting was necessary, would be happy to meet with him. Winn said Ray Lewis would be in contact with these people on the 17th and depending on the results of his efforts, may necessitate a trip by Winn and possible one other elected official. (6b) Report of the General Manager FAH reported that he had some good news . Said Clean Water ~ill HR 9560 finally went to floor of House and passed 339 to 5. House has authori zed 17 billion for three years and has provisions for ad valorem tax and deferrment of 1977 deadlines for secondary treatment. Said these things that we have been working on will help us try to resolve differences with EPA. On Senate side have one year extension and $500,000 funding program. They don't want to fool around with bill this year. Just give money. Should put Senate in rather awkward position and we will be pressing to get this to Congress. Said he thought it would help if Directors could write to Senators Tunney and Cranston. Particularly to Senator Tunney who is a member of the Public Works Committee and a friend of Senator Muskie . Was asked when it was coming up in Senate and FAH said he didn't know if they would take any action between now and June 30. Will know in another week. Question asked if 208 funding was in that bill and was answered yes, it is. FAH then read from House Committee report that went to floor . Said he thought we were moving in the right direction, and should put pressure on Senator Tunney. Directors then requested that FAH draft a letter to Senators Tunney and Cranston and send to all Directors re HR9560. (6c) Report of the General Counsel TLW said there were a few items on the agenda that may generat e some questions such as Conflict of Interest Code. Will answer then. No pending litigation other than minor liability claims. (33) DISTRICT 7 -Lazy B Estates, Inc. annexation request Chairman Saltarelli requested that this item be moved up on the agenda because some of District 7 Directors had to leave early. TLW reported that request is to defer payment of certain portion of annexation fees on basis that it is confined strictly to open space. No sewerage neede d. ·, The owner sees no problem in deferring this for about 30 days. Said question has been asked whether we can do it and in what manner can we protect the District should the property develop later. TLW said we can do it and we can secure it with the cooperation of owner by executing documents or agreement to have lien on real property to be assured of collection of fees. Said in view of the fact that the owner sees no problem in deferring, would recommend doing that and could come back to Board with detailed staff report and meet with the owner to develop a procedure and agreement. Norman Brock said a 30 day deferment would be fine. It was then moved and seconded to continue this item to the July 14th Board meeting. Motion carried. (lla-1) Resolution No. 76-97 Svalstad asked if this was the resolution with recommendations for 16 new people and was answered yes. (lla-2) Joint Operating Budget & Corf Budget (lla-3) JWS ·report Svalstad said he thought the Joint Operating Budget was fine, but really couldn't conceive and would vote against CORF. Would like to know what the budget would be to take care of our increased hydraulic demand with respect to secondary treatment. Said we shouldn't increase tax rate unless we were forced to by law. Would like to see what budget would be on our hydraulicdemand to treat water with what we feel is proper treatment. REL then referred to five-year projection. Said non-grant funded projects are basically those that we would fund ourselves without State and EPA funding. Those listed above that are those required by law. Some of those will be allowed to provide for hydrauliccapacity as well as better solids handling. If the budget did not include secondary treatment, was not sure how much the difference would be but would be significant. Reported that our District sewer program is trailing off and we will now be placing our efforts here in the plant. We do take exception to the need for secondary treatment and as reported by staff, are continuing our efforts to place it into some rationale. Right now the law says secondary treatment. Have received some relief. Is somewhere between primary treatment and secondary treatment and there is going to be some change in there. Said we are now working on JPL process which is a viable process, particularly as relates to suspended solids. Don't think we can just stop and do nothing and go back to our old level of treatment .. With this budget it does allow us to proceed .. Think there is enough time to fall short as the law is now written. Right now this program is to provide secondary treatment for 175 million gallons of sewage. Is nothing in there for increased flows or the next 10-20 years. Maybe this is all we will have to build but not sure. Svalstad stated h'e didn't know how this relates to individual home owners. Would like to see what· staff recommendations would be and what we would do if they weren't forcing us into this position. Ray said it would be less but don't know what it would be. Referred to page 2 of budget. Said in previous years were high in other areas of need. Monies .shifted. Last year budget$98.9 million; this year $95 million. JWS reiterated that this shifts funds from one area to another. Tax rate won't triple. District 3 are the ones with real problems. -2- ('rtd) REL added that because of timing, do allocate funds for September 1977. This type of planning is necessary. Will not really obligate major funds until this time next year. Depends on HR9560 and what comes out of Senate. JWS said have to have these funds available if requested. Svalstad said he thought if we can't get it sold between now and November, will never get it sold. Smith said he supported Bernie's thoughts. FAH said recommendation was to adopt budget but doesn't necessarily mean we are going to spend it. This wouldn't have come up this year except State has this money to get rid of. Districts have been put in position of jumping ahead. We are doing the engineering which will take until this time next year. Will not be letting a contract until then. Svalstad said he thought we could come back later if we need tax increase. FAH said he thought they should adopt budget and then at the time the individual District budgets are prepared, if we run into a particular situation, could amend. These budgets are not taxing budgets. Svalstad said that would be OK to him. Saltarelli commented that he thought it is time the Districts are going to have to use a good deal of foresite. Not sure what the new construction is going to mean in the future. Would like to keep tax rates low but think we should begin to plan for a very intelligent plan for tax rates .to assure continued operation of fantastic new facilities and much new personnel. If we can do it in intelligent manner, can avoid sizeable increase in tax rate. Think we should protect the taxpayers from tremendous jump. Feel we should be passing budgets within the next 2 or 3 years to be anticipating operation of new facilities. JWS said if construction expenditures come down in next S~ years, then have to operate and maintain -100% taxpayers. Rycoff then asked regarding Operating budget and employees' agreements for wages and benefits, said he would be interested to know who approves that--Directors or Executive Committee. FAH said Directors give the staff guidelines. Question also asked with regard to the existing plant, is the amortization schedule build into budget? JWS said we have amortization but don't presently have fund depreciation. Less than 3% a year. Is requirement of revenue program and will be doing that in the future. Shenkman asked if there is a depreciation schedule and was answered yes Winn then advised that the equipment we put in now for secondary treatment will handle increased flows if the ocean discharge requirements -are reduced. Svalstad . said he felt 100% better after hearing that. Items ll(a)(2) & (3) were then moved and seconded. Roll call vote for both items together. Motion carried. Svalstad then asked for summary report on game plan--where we are and where we are going in order to resolve this secondary treatment situation. Had lost track of situation. Asked FAH to send with next agenda. It was also requested to put in report what it would cost individual taxpayers in each individual District based on anticipated figures. Waiver of connection fees TLW advised Executive Committee recommended no action. Just to receive and file. Moved & seconded to receive and file. (R & F what??) -3- Young stated that some of the Directors thought they should allow flex ibi l ity in the future as our current ordinance doesn't give us flexibility. Said a 2/3 vote could allow the waiver of fees. Think we should cons ider doing our p art . Winn indicated occasions like this have been about twice a nd have spent more time and money on staff time than what waiver would be. Also feel tha t if a city wants to do so, should come in and ·request it. Voice vote on receive and file motion. Motion carried. (12) Nominations for Joint Chairman & Vice Joint Chairman (13-b) Directors nominated for Joint Chairman: Wedaa, Scott & Winn Moved nominations be closed. Director Fox nominated for Vice Joint Chairman. Moved nominations be closed. Conflict of Interest Code TLW briefly reported on background of code. Said Ex ecutive Committee requested that he obtain a formal opinion from Fair Labor Practices Commission as to whether Directors would need to file . Request has been made but have not received an acknowledgement to d a te. Know that they are swamped in Sacramento and suspect request has been put on the pile. Said resolution contains effective date--January 1, 1977, so although we are required to adopt it, we really have better than 6 months to do a variety of things including any amendments necessary. The Code, as drafted, will apply both to Directors and those certain enumerated employees of the Districts. Said Directors may be getting somewhat of a conflicting recommendation of procedure in their individual cities because as elected city councilmen they are covered by provisions in Proposition 9. Everybody else in State must do according to Code that is adopted. Cities will probably come to Directors with two codes--one very brief and second one very similar to this one and will apply to employees with possibility of financial conflict. Under this code does not apply to provisions of Proposition 9. Stated further that it was his opinion and r ecommendation that we attempt to simply adopt a formal code that will apply to employees and Directors. Exhibit "A" lists people covered by this. This is to reduce the p aperwork and get some degree of uniformity. Will be different from one at their city or county but will be close. Think Fair Labor Practices Board will not say that they don't have to file duplicate so probably will have to . The financial evaluation of their holdings or interest in real property or business investments and those do llar amounts are identical to those set forth in Code. No variation in that. Reported that this code h a s been distributed to cities and they may adopt Section 3.7. Designed to come as close as possible to what was contained in the Muskonie Bill three years ago. Said if you have a conflict and declare a n d· give notice of it and rely upon an opinion of General Counsel, in the event a conflict does come up, you will have the assurance that the Districts' attorney will come down on this. Get an opinion as to whether it exists and rely on that opinion. Said that throughout our community have people who don't like what we do and are quick to . file a harrassment suit. Will have to move quickly. If we don't have somebody f i le lawsuit one year later, wheels of progress may co me to hault. State Commission has tacitly approved including these in the c ode. -4- .. . . - (14-b) Kaywood advised of a typographical error in Code on page 2 of the summary. Top paragraph, last line--a business entity "owned" by, not "and" by. Also questioned first page of Article !--effective date January 1, 1977, and third page, Section 2.3--filing an initial disclosure statement within 30 days of effective date. Says annual statement should be filed in the month of April each year. Is that April, 1977 or one year later? TLW advised that Proposition 9 request first statement must be filed within 30 d~ys. Will only require a business investments diclosure. Will not include income disclosure. Second statement will be April 30, 1978. Moved to close hearing. TLW advised no written comments received. Olson asked TLW question regarding a conflict of his. TLW said he would contact him and advise later. NASA Amendment FAH reported that just a month ago we extended the NASA contract on JPL work. It turned out after we thought we had all the numbers worked out, there was a misunderstanding over a purchase order we issued some time ago. As a result of that, they had proceeded with the work and in the calculation of what they needed to complete the work, they did not include the $20,000. We are recommending that this agreement that was entered into last month be amended to include this $20,000. Question was asked if that was for design time and was answered yes. He added that there was a misunderstanding of what our purchase order meant. Was back when we got the first approval from State. Issued purchase order to start work because contractual agreement was not worked · out. No reference was made to purchase order and they added it. They failed to include that money in the additional money requested last month. Moved and seconded to approve resolution. Motion carried. (15) Amending Annexation Policies Wood questioned wording on amendment. Wondered if we weren't changing it to accommodate proponents so they wouldn't have to pay the correct fee. TLW explained that it was just the opposite. Resolutions moved, seconded and carried. -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX Bl 27, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) May 6, 1976 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. lJ 2) 3) SJ 6J 7) & ll WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 1976) 7:30 P,M, 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNT~IN VALLEY1 CALIFORNIA TELEPHDN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TI1e nc-'xt regu1.ar meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Schedu 1 ~'<l Upcoming Meetings: ------··----------------·-- DISTRICT 11 1'\DJOURNEJ) rffG. ·-Monday, ~lay 2•1, 1976, 7:00 p.ra., llrn:tingtor:. Beach Counci 1 Chambers EXEC:UTIVE cm1'11TTEE -Tuesday, June 1, 19'76, 5:30 p.m. (Tentative) MAN AGE R'S AG ENDA RE PORT County San itation Dist ri cts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS May 12, 1 9 7 6 -7:30 p.m. Post Office Box 8 127 l 0844 Ell is Aven ue Fo untai n Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-29 10 9 6 2-24 1 1 The following i s a brief exp l anation o f the more important , non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which a r e not otherwise se l f -explanatory. Warrant lists are now en- closed with the agenda material , summarizing bil l s paid since t h e Apri l Joint Board meeting. Jo i nt Boards No . 9-a -Change Order No. 1 -Job No . PW -049 -New Water We ll at Plant No . 1 . The cont r actor has requested an extension of time of 45 calendar days on his current contract because of an emergency c omm i tment . The staff recommends this change order for time extens i on on l y , at n o cost to the Distri c t s , because the delays wi ll not affect the Districts ' requir ements for the installatj_on of the water wel l a t Pl ant No. 1 . No. 9 ~b -Addendum No. 1 to Job No . E-079 -Rehabilitation of Rothrock Outfall Pumping Station . This addendum was issued pursuant to requests by certain equipment contractors re garding the torsional analysis which was to be completed and made a part of the drive system to be submitted at the -time of the bid. Tors i onal information cannot be developed until the successful bidder is named in order to make the engines compatible with to-be -purchased gear and pump equipment. Th e staff r ecommends appr oval of t h is addendum to the plans a nd spec i fications for this job . No . 9 -c -Consideration of Award of Purchase Contract for On e (1) Outfa l l Engine, Job No . E-079 . Bids were opened for this equipment o n May 3, 1976 . Three bids were received , ranging in price from $76,318 to $99,250.98 . We therefor e recommend award of a pur chase contract to the low bidder , Waukesha Engine Service, Inc ., for one (1) engine i n the amount of $76 ,3 1 8 , and that we proceed , as previously a u thorized , in the n egotiated purchase o f the two (2) "used " engines from P&S Repa i r Service for $55 ,600 each , p l us tax ($3,336) and freight (estimated at $1 ,100). ·Total price , in- cl uding tax and freight -$60 ,036 each . No. 9-d -·Request for Approval of Directors ' Fees and Compen sation. I t i s requested that the Joint Boards authorize payment of compens a tion to the Joint Cha i r man and a Director for attending meetings on behalf of the Districts as described in the agenda . No. 9-e -Amendment to PERS Agreement . Resoluti on No . 76 -84 formalizes the action taken by the Boards on April 14th , to depool from the PER S funding pool, and pr ovides for one-year fina l compensation basis for r e tirement · benefits. This action will reduce the percentage of Districts' contrib ution to the PERS and is c onsistent with the Districts' objective of transf e rring to the Orange County Employees Retir e - ment System, which is presently under consideration . We h ave just been advised by PERS that under our pr esent situation, the Districts ' contribution to PERS will be 11.51%. Depooling will reduce the Districts contribution effective July 1st , to 7 .96%, which r epres ents a savings of $37,870 for the corning year. Districts Nos. 1 and 7 No. 9-f -Design Fee for Raitt Street Trunk Sewer . Pursuant to the District No . 1 Board 's authorization, the staff has ne got iated with Boy l e Engineering Corporation for t h e engineering design to be accomp lished for the proposed Raitt Street Trunk. The total estimated cost, including construction engineer- ing d esign , surveying, con struction inspection, and incidental costs is approximately $1~ mi llion . We have negotiated a fee for the proposed project of $65 ,900 , which does not include the field survey services and construction staking . The necessary survey - ing will b e performed on a per diem basis at the hourly rates included in the engineering firm's proposal dated May 5th . The cost of this facility will b e shared by Districts Nos. 1 and 7 in accordance with the following: Di strict No. 1 District No. 7 95% 5% It is the staff 's recommendation that the proposal of Boyle Engineering Corporation be a ccepted . -2- , ,. District No. 2 No. 9-g -Proposed Annexation No. 15 -Req u est for Annexation of Territory to Sanitation District No . 2 . Included with the agenda material is a l etter requesting annex ation of 26.382 ac re s to Sanitation District No. 2. The action appearing on the agenda is to refer the matter to the District's staff for study and recommendation. District No. 3 No. 9-h -Sewer Service for La Habra Heights Area, Los Ange le s County . The staff has had discussions with representatives of the Ci ty of La Habra and the Los Angeles County Engineers ' office to con-. sider possible sewer service for unincorporated areas in Los Angeles County tributary to the Santa Ana Bas i n . The waste treatment flows from this area are minimal (1/4 mgd). It is anticipated that a 3 -way agreement will be developed involving the City of La Habra , the County of Los Angeles and District No . 3 . However , because the Districts' flows are reaching existing treatment plant capacity and the State and EPA have been reluctant to authorize construction of additional capacities, actual connections may not be permi tted for some time to come . The action appearing on the agenda receives and files the County of Los Angeles request and refers it to the staff for study and recommendation . No. 9-i -Stop Notice on Contract No . 3 -20 -2. The Districts have received a Stop Notice in the amount of $585 against the ·Districts ' contractor. District No. 5 No. 9-j -Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Collection of District Connection Fees . We have receive d a request from the City of Newport Beach to ame nd the current agreement for collection of District connection fees. The current agreement provides for a 5% administrative fee payab l e to the City by the District upon invoicing, based on the do llar amount of District connection fees collected by the City . Their Finance Director wishes to deduct the 5% fee from the monthly remittance, rather than invoicing the District separately . This procedure is used in Districts 2 and 3 , and is currently proposed to be used in District No. 7, I t is the staff 's recommendation to app r ove the request of Newport Beach. -3- District No . 7 No. 9-k -Ordering Annexation No. 42 ~ Tract No. 8640. In October, 1974, the Board authorized the initiation of annexation proceedings for Tract No. 8640 to annex approxi - mately 23 acres in the vicinity of Skyline Drive and Plantero Drive. The property will be divided into single-family resi - d ential lots and the wastewater discharge will be consistent with the flows anticipated by the Districts ' Master Plan. We have now received Local Agency Formation Commission approval and the proponent has paid the District 's annexation fees . The staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 76 -86 -7, ordering annexation. No. 9 -1 -Ordering Annexation No . 46 -Tracts 8799 and 8827 . In March, 1975, the Board authorized initiation of proceedings to annex 62.64 acres in the vicinity of Orange Park Acres Boulevard and Chapman Ave nue. The following special conditions were p l aced on this annexation: (1) That annexation fees for Tract No . 8827 (19+ acres) would be due and payable prior to final approva l of Annexation No. 46. The proponent was to execute a note for the balance of the unpaid annexation fees (based on approximately 42 acres (Tract No. 8799) $41,460) and a Deed of Trust with an Assignment of Rents to the District to secure said note . (2) Semi-annual payment of interest on said note at the rate of 7% per annum . (3) Payment of unpaid Dis trict No . 7 annexation fees in effect at the time the Tract No. 8799 map is recorded , but in no event lat er than July 1, 197 7 . The District is in receipt of the annexation fees fo r Tract No. 8827, the executed Promissory Note, and other n ec essary documents, including approval of the Local Agency Formation Com- mission. It is the staff 's recommendati on that the Board formally approve Annexation No . 46 in the City of Orange. No. 9-m -Request for Annexation of Tract No. 8745 -Annexation No. 54. Last month, the Board referred a request for annexat i on of 22 acres in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and the proposed ex - ten sion of Crawford Canyon Road to the staff for a recommendation. The development proposed meets the District low -density r esident ial -4- criteria which has been established for this area in th e District Master Plan and the property is within the City of Orange . The staff recommends that the Board adopt Reso l ution No . 76 -88 -7, initiating annexation proceedings. District No . 11 No. 9-n -Change Order No . 2 to Contrac t No . ll -4R -Rem o d el Newland-Hamilton Pumping Station Facilities. This change order adjusts the engineer 's quantities and grants a t ime extension of 66 calendar days for material de lays s u s tained by the contractor . The adjustments of the engineer's quanti tie s adds s i x lineal .feet to .the perimeter block wa l l at a total change in the amount of $157 .31 . The staff recommends acceptance of this change order . No. 9 -o -Accepting Contract No. ll-4 R as Complete . The contractor , Clifford L . Thompson Construction Company, has completed the remodeling of the Newland -Bamilton Pumping S tation facilities in accordance with the plans and specifications . This contract was for the rehabilitation of the exterior of the pumping facilities; including landscapin g , paving and perimeter block wall to make the facilities more compatible with the existing develop - ments in the area. Southern California Gas Company cooperated in this project by payin g for work included in the contract which affected their adjacent faci l ities. Final a dj usted contract price for this project is $21,193 .26 which is well below the budget amount of $40,000 as authorized in this year 's budget . The staff recommends acc ept ance of the work and authorization to file the Notice of Completion on this project. All Districts No . 11 -Report of the Executive Committ ee . The Committee met on May 4th and enclosed for the Directors is a writ te n r ep ort of their discussions and recommended items for .consid eration by the Boards . No . 13 -Staff Progre ss Report on J PL -AC TS Pilot Plant Facili ty . The staff will make a slide presentatio n and briefly review the stat us of this project, detai ling some of t he construct ion procedures employed in constructing this 1 mgd fac ility in less than six months. -5- District No. 1 1 No. 28 -Adjournment to May 24th. The staff is recommending that the Board adjourn to 7:00 p.m., Monday, May 24th , for the purpose of meeting jointly with the Huntington Beach City Council in a workshop session to discuss the proposed District Master Plan which is being prepared by Keith and Associates, consulting engineers to the District . -6- Fred A. Harper General Manager